lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Edward Bromhead

message: I felt that, given his role in George Green's career, Bromhead deserved a brief article of his own (and so, apparently, did the creators of the entry for Green, given that they included a targetless link to Bromhead). However, as he was more of a minor player, this article probably doesn't need to be much longer.  I thought I might include something about the cooling of the relationship with Green (see the cited article by Cannell/Lord), but couldn't find a way of expressing it briefly enough. Markus Poessel 20:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article creation

message: Taken from Edward Ffrench Bromhead (duplicate article):
Sir Edward Thomas Ffrench Bromhead (March 26, 1789 – March 14, 1855), second baronet, was an Irish mathematician. Born in Dublin, he was elected to a fellowship of the Royal Society in 1817, after his paper "On the fluents of irrational functions" was published by the society's Philosophical Transactions the year before. He was a member of the Analytical Society—along with Charles Babbage, George Peacock, and Sir John Herschel—whose primary goal was to see in England the adoption of the Leibnizian notation for the calculus over Newton's notation. Bromhead supported and encouraged the mathematicians George Boole and George Green.
Bromhead has a botanical author abbreviation; the orders Asparagales, Arecales, Brassicales, Fabales, Lamiales, and Magnoliales were named by him.
In his later years, he suffered from progressive blindness. He died at Thurlby Hall, Thurlby  in 1855. 
References:
* A. W. F. Edwards, "Bromhead, Sir Edward Thomas Ffrench, second baronet (1789–1855)", rev., Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004. Accessed September, 2006 (subscription required).
::Thanks for merging.  Back then, I had simply followed the red link from George Green and gone ahead and created the article; evidently, I didn't look thoroughly enough (typical newbie mistake, I guess). --Markus Poessel 16:32, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicate article
Talk:Book of generations

message: Can somebody please add the following:
* A list of verses that comprise The Book  of Generations;
* A pointer to book that discusses it in more detail;67.136.147.115 20:12, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Jimhoward72 (talk) 16:24, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Isn't the word "Torah" a proper name that should be capitalized?

message: The title should be capitalised: Book of Generations
BobKilcoyne (talk) 04:56, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Title
Talk:The Ego and the Id

message: This article is terrible!! It needs to be sorted out. I might do a little but I'm terribly busy. Someone, perhaps on the relevant wikiproject, really ought to wikify this. Tanzeel 20:13, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, this page seems to be a summarized version of the whole book. Not wikified at all. Also the content could be copied from somewhere...Typer525 Talk 01:11, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree: it's a mess.  Billbrock (talk) 02:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work to be done
Talk:François Baron de Tott

message: De Tott is mentioned in letters between Voltaire and Catherine the Great of Russia, in connection with the Pugachev rebellion. Can someone in the know add enough for the references to make sense? Thanks.145.116.8.66 (talk) 02:44, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Margaret Singana

message: We are growing is sometimes refered to as the marihuana grower's song.
This is because a phrase in the chorus, "We are growing, growing higher and higher" was parodied by a Dutch standup comedian as "We are growing, growing Marihuana" (which rhimes).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.159.64.210 (talk) 19:57, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As per WP:ELBURDEN, disputed links should be excluded by default until there is consensus for inclusion.  please explain what unique value you feel the disputed link provides when there is already a link providing that specific image. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:25, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The link to F.A.G. provides a better image. WP:RSP#Find A Grave allows for some uses of the website, so the requirement for consensus does not always apply. Sundayclose (talk) 18:45, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sundayclose, it's literally the exact same image, and consensus is still required whenever a link is disputed. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:49, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The quality of the images are not "literally the same". Sundayclose (talk) 18:51, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no difference in image quality sufficient to justify that the disputed link provides "valuable additional content". Nikkimaria (talk) 18:53, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Each of us has an opinion. Yours doesn't carry more weight than mine. Sundayclose (talk) 18:56, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is why we have ELBURDEN as a tiebreaker: if we can't arrive at a consensus then the link is excluded by default. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:58, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a "tiebreaker". My last comment unless you say something new or someone else comments. Sundayclose (talk) 18:59, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a "tiebreaker". My last comment unless you say something new or someone else comments. Sundayclose (talk) 19:00, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

text: As we have been unable to reach at a consensus, I have removed the link per WP:NOCON. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:37, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: External link
Talk:May-Louise Flodin

message: In November 1955 Flodin visited the Philippines.  There are three photos of her in the newspaper article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.105.126.218 (talk) 08:52, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  May-Louise Flodin in the Philippines 
Talk:Community of Christ membership and field organization

message: The amount of material in the Community of Christ article would be too great if all matters were consolidated into a single article. This probably belongs in an article a little broader? "Community of Christ membership and field organization" Glenn4pr 20:26, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just think that a whole article of statistics doesn't look great - maybe the main article needs cutting into separate ones. Or if these stats are available on another website then why not just reference them on the main article where you link to this one (...reports nearly 200,000 members in 50 nations.). ...adam...  (talk • contributions)  20:27, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I don't think the statistics are online. They are in print as cited. Please have paticence as the article will expand. The Community of Christ category has over 25 articles, the various subfields and topics are too extensive to be merged. Glenn4pr 21:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Breadth

message: *Merge main data only, then delete This article is not appropriate for the encyclopedia.  It is just so much "inside baseball" that is not relevant to the needs of an unaffiliated person wanting to find out something about the church. Overall membership or domestic/international totals would be OK to put in the main CofC article, then this one should be deleted. --Blainster 03:08, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to CofC proposal
Talk:Nakoku

message: Fascinating to think of multiple kingdoms within the land we now know only as Japan. A few points to consider as the article is improved:
* Coverage: So, there was a country? And the Han Chinese knew about it? What else? There's very little about the history. Did it make a war on somebody? Did the Han help improve their infrastructure or agriculture? Also, after the farmer found the seal, then what? Surely there were some archaeological excavations done. What were the results?
* Structure: Divide the notes and the references sections. There's a template for footnotes, , or something. There should also be seperate sections for chronology, culture (if anything is known), and maybe archaeology theories and conclusions.
* Supporting materials: An infobox might not be necessary, and photos may be impossible, but what about one of those "Timelines of Japan" boxes? They're often placed on the right side of the page of many Japanese history articles. 
Good luck! Boneyard90 (talk) 18:00, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: WPJ Assessment Commentary
Talk:Princess María de las Mercedes of Bourbon-Two Sicilies

message: Pardon the somewhat gruesome question, but was the Countess put in, or is she still in, the pudridero at the Escorial? Charles 22:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Burial

message: There are three double redirects here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maria_de_las_Mercedes&redirect=no http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Countess_Mercedes_of_Barcelona&redirect=no and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maria_Mercedes_of_Bourbon-Two_Sicilies&redirect=no and they all double redirect through the same one, so, tilde or not tilde, that is the question. I apologize for that last bit.
Arenlor (talk) 07:02, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tilde or no? 
Talk:Marian McCargo

message: The summary box on the main page says, "Alma mater West Hills College, Boston".  The main text says "Boston's West Hills College."  The hot link for West Hills College, Boston goes to West Hills College which reads "West Hills Community College District (WHC) is a public community college district in California serving students in the San Joaquin Valley." It mentions Coalinga and Lemoore campuses. There is NO MENTION of Boston in the article. 
Questions: Was there once a West Hills College in Boston, MA? Did Marion attend college in Boston or California? If in Boston, what is the correct name of the college she attended?  (Did she attend Boston College, itself?) Why does her alma mater read "West Hills College, Boston"? AdderUser (talk) 14:20, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  West Hills College, Boston or California? 

message: The lead contains the only mention of tennis. The lead should summarize the rest of the article. Should tennis be mentioned at all? -- Pemilligan (talk) 16:14, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tennis?
Talk:Marie Brémont

message: Seems notable. BBC obituary, &c.--Counter-revolutionary (talk) 00:14, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: I merged this article fully into List of French supercentenarians, then  restored it. What's the benefit of keeping a separate page? I would assume that WP:NOPAGE applies, and the merger WP:PRESERVED any well-sourced and relevant biographical information we had. — JFG talk 18:52, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: On one level, I support the redirect JFG made. On the other hand, I would be fully on board taking this article to AfD, since I believe it fails various Wikipedia policies as is. Newshunter12 (talk) 02:08, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

text: Any comment? — JFG talk 23:35, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No response: I have added the recently-added picture to the merged list, and restored the redirect here. — JFG talk 12:48, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restored despite full merge
Talk:Marie Jahoda

message: This article was full of mistakes! She was imprisoned by the fascists beacuse she was a socialist, of which there is no mention!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RosaJochmann (talk • contribs) 15:46, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is OR and I cannot of course include it.  I was a student at Sussex 1967-1970, and in our first days we were given an IQ test.  We were told at the time that Prof Jahoda was researching the relationship between IQ and eventual level of degree obtained; but I never saw a follow up.  Does anyone have more info?  Cross Reference (talk) 20:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Jahoda and IQ research

message: She has been put in the :Category:Economists of innovation although she is a psychologist.
Marie Jahoda has been very active in the SPRU with Christopher Freeman and Keith Pavitt.
"Economics of innovation" should be taken in a broader sense including Law (IP), psychology, soociology, neurosciences, etc... Euroflux (talk) 14:38, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Economists of innovation]] 

message: This section is not fully consistent with Jahoda's 1958 book Current Concepts of Positive Mental Health (New York: Basic Books, Inc.). In that book, the most succinct summary of her conception of "ideal mental health" (n.b.: that phrase is not used in the book) is to be found on p. 23, where the "six major categories of concepts" are: "attitudes of an individual toward his own self"; "the individual's style and degree of growth, development, or self-actualization"; "a central synthesizing psychological function.... [t]his function will here be called integration"; "autonomy" which "singles out the individual's degree of independence from social influences"; "adequacy of an individual's perception of reality"; and "environmental mastery" (which on p. 53 is said to include "(1) the ability to love; (2) adequacy in love, work, and play; (3) adequacy in interpersonal relations; (4) efficiency in meeting situational requirements; (5) capacity for adaptation and adjustment; (6) efficiency in problem-solving"). Because the current text is misleading, I suggest that we modify this section to reflect the content of Jahoda's published work.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stpeter (talk • contribs) 00:04, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideal Mental Health
Talk:The Sutton School

message: The wording of the final paragraph is extremely loaded, apart from which some of the detail is misleading. For example: 1 No mention is made of his parents (it is the parent's legal responsibility to send the child to school) and they will almost certainly have been the ones to institute preceedings. 2 The council did not try to force anything; they allocated what they thought was a suitable school place. 3 'Aspired' suggests much more than 'wanted'.  4 A hearing at a Special Educational Needs Tribunal can in no way be described as a 'court battle'. 5 Not strictly relevant to the paragraph as written, but the associated link does not read as if written by an expert in the field, and appears in an American journal that seems to have printed the report uncritically and with some ignorance of the affair (including the tag 'Changing Perspectives: London, England').
The article, if it is to keep reference to Andrew, needs to be better sourced as well as written in neutral language. Emeraude 12:43, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final paragraph
Talk:Pfitzner–Moffatt oxidation

message: Perhaps a page dealing with oxidation of alcohols with "activated DMSO" should be added. We must agree in a proper definition of different variants of this oxidation.
For example, it is very clear that an oxidation using oxalyl chloride-activated DMSO is a Swern oxidation.
I would like to suggest using the name "Pfitzner-Moffatt oxidation" for any DMSO-activated oxidation using a carbodiimide as the activating agent. The name "Moffat oxidation" could be used for any DMSO-activated oxidation.
Gabriel Tojo
The Mofatt oxidation is also described at dicyclohexylcarbodiimide page.
ChristianoGh 08:04, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

message: The middle structure in the reaction scheme ist most definitley wrong. There has to be a lone pair at the Carbonatom next to the sulfur and therefore a negative charge instead of a positive charge. Two positive charges next to each other in one molecule is very unlikely, if not impossible, in chemistry. --Zwischenrufer (talk) 10:43, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  There was an error in the reaction scheme.  It was discussed in Journal of Chemical Education .  The scheme was corrected by Mandlerm on 29 September 2016. --Taweetham (talk) 02:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in the scheme mentioned in JCE
Talk:Mark Gardner (murderer)

message: :This is a confusing article. The daughter is raped but "Sara McCurdy had gone to her parents' home for lunch". The article is about a subject that murdered three people (and raped one) becoming the 3rd condemned inmate to be put to death in 1999 in Arkansas, the 20th person executed by the state of Arkansas since 1973, and the 569th person executed since 1977.
:There is nothing notable, significant, or "historical" about this. Otr500 (talk) 20:14, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:Ottawa Hills, Ohio

message: Ref for School District second best in Ohio
Go to this website http://ilrc.ode.state.oh.us/Power_Users.asp click begin, then click ratings, district ratings, the school year (I picked 2005-2006) and click run report. If you sort by Performance Index, you get Ottowa Hills as number two with a score of 109.3 The link itself is a paragraph long, but I am not sure which link to reference to. Anyone? Kaw in stl 16:12, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: From the article "According to the United States Census Bureau, the village has a total area of 100.8 km² (1.86 mi²)." This cannot be right, I know it is definitly not 100.8 km2, but I am not sure that the 1.9 mi1 is correct either (although that is definitly a closer to accurate figure if not accurate).
I was also wondering if anyone could elaborate on the "Ottawa Hell House?" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mwv2 (talk • contribs) 
::It actually is 1.86 miles (see http://www.city-data.com/city/Ottawa-Hills-Ohio.html). What about the Ottawa Hell house?  hmwith  talk 22:16, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area? 

message: Thomas White and the incident in 2009 is notable if infamous, if he is not to be put in Notable Persons, would you suggest placing a new section in the article? Please reply with a suggestion if you edit Mr. White out of notable persons again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.162.164.50 (talk) 21:09, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Persons
Talk:Vize

message: == Kırıkkale or Kırklareli  ==
In section "places of interest" it reads "Amphitheater reliefs ...are exhibited in the Museum of Kırıkkale." This claim was added on 18 Dec. 2011 and it is sourced ("vize com"). But when I checked the source I saw it was changed and it has no reference to Amphitheater. I think something is wrong with this claim for Kırıkkale and Vize are about  apart and it is illogical to keep Vize related items in Kırıkkale. I think it should be Kırklareli. I'll call the editor. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 09:34, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: *  CeeGee 09:34, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: In section "places of interest" it reads "Amphitheater reliefs ...are exhibited in the Museum of Kırıkkale." This claim was added on 18 Dec. 2011 and it is sourced ("vize com"). But when I checked the source I saw it was changed and it has no reference to Amphitheater. I think something is wrong with this claim for Kırıkkale and Vize are about  apart and it is illogical to keep Vize related items in Kırıkkale. I think it should be Kırklareli. I'll call the editor. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 09:34, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: *  CeeGee 09:34, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kırıkkale or Kırklareli  

message: Great deal of detail for the Byzantine period and then almost nothing for the Ottoman or Repiblican periods. If anyone has any info... Ealinggirl1954 (talk) 20:17, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section is very unbalanced
Talk:Marshall Caifano

message: "His relative Carmine Caifano of Louisville KY, was apart of the booming online casino business, but the gov. put a short hault to online gambling."
Rogermx (talk) 02:57, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed comment about living person

message: Didn’t Caifano go to prison in 1964 for attempted kidnapping and extortion of Ray Ryan? 213.205.240.126 (talk) 16:12, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Added with sources. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 18:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Ray Ryan
Talk:Martin Theodore Orne

message: Any chance anyone knows how to pronounce Orne so I don't have have to risk embarrassing myself in conversation when discussing the origins of basic experimental methods? — Harry (talk) 23:49, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This video has it as basically a silent E, rhyming with "horn", but I can't verify that myself. If we could find out from a reliable source, it would be good to add a pronunciation to the entry. EricEnfermero (Talk) 23:59, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  I was about to say “we could easily cite that video, nothing wrong with that!” but after watching a bit of it, I'm not so sure of its credibility haha. I actually suspect that given his Austrian birth, it's more likely that the E is pronounced; something like rhyming with Lorna. I'll have a look later to see if there's a credible source anywhere. Otherwise there might be some reference to that name in Austrian somewhere that'll do for now. — Harry (talk) 00:49, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: I removed a link to the following obituary per WP:ELNO#1, but leave it here for potential article development. --Animalparty! (talk) 02:43, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link 

message: There has been a section named CIA funding which has been in and out of this article since this version back in 2016, the content and the sources cited in support have varied. I'm no expert in the article topic or in the content presented in this section, but I stumbled into this a few edits ago and, because of that, I am following it up this far. 
What caught my attention was noticing the removal of the section and its contents, including supporting cites, with an edit summary saying "Removed incorrect section". That immediately brought thoughts of WP:DUE to mind. I restored the section with some minor edits, and I now see it removed again here with an edit summary saying "Removed inaccurate information from flawed source. [further]". The source may be flawed, I don't know, but the further info given in the edit summary there seems to me to be WP:OR. For what it is worth, I did a bit of googling and found this article by the author of the criticized source which appears to contest the point of criticism re Orne and a top secret clearance. Again, I'm not familiar with the details of all of this but I am concerned about WP:OR and that WP:DUE was not considered here.
The additional information added here after the section removal may or may not balance that removal; I don't know enough abut the details to make a judgement. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:16, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  CIA funding section and WP:DUE
Talk:Marvin E. Frankel

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Marvin E. Frankel was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 20:56, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Marvin Mitchelson

message: Is it not true that he got caught for palimony himself? Valetude (talk) 12:35, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caught for palimony? 
Talk:Tête Jaune Cache, British Columbia

message: I'm just getting a start on this page. Plan much more later. CindyBo 20:36, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mary Ellis

message: The article says, "She became a centenarian in 1998 ..." If she was born June 15, 1897, as the lead says, she should have become a centenarian in 1997. The Centenarian article defines the word as "a person who has reached the age of 100 years", which she would have done in 1997. Eddie Blick (talk) 02:57, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, thanks, Eddie. -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:24, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Becoming a centenarian