lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Copyright law of Greece

message: What on heaven has Greek state done to fight piracy? Everyone sees pirated music sellers everywhere. If there WAS a state and/or police, they would know to which particular places they would begin prosecutions Pictureuploader 10:20, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Dude, GADA hasn't proclaimed open Nigerian pogrom season, yet. (Οι μπάτσοι  μας πουλανε/την ει-ρω-ή-νη/μα μένα ο Σπηλιοτόπουλος/τζάμπα μου τη δίνει) Project2501a 07:54, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:United States copyright law which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 12:45, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Chris Botti

message: It's called a harmon mute, most trumpet and trombone players use them very often. In no way is it notable through only Miles and Botti. The language in the article is very strange. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.21.20.166 (talk) 10:13, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Very true. Pleased to say it seems to have been sorted out quite some time ago. DBaK (talk) 20:16, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Harmon mute

message: Discography?
A bio? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.232.96.54 (talk) 21:48, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article seems to have improved a bit in the ~15 years since these comments were made. DBaK (talk) 20:16, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info? 

message: Why is there a link to Chris Standring's discography - does it have anything to do with Chris Botti? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.129.132.212 (talk) 15:36, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chris Standring?
Talk:Cognitive liberty

message: We need an article on Rogers v. Okin. —Viriditas | Talk 23:01, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, but I've added this section here because it could be included in the article in the future and needs discussion.  Go ahead and create it if this topic is of interest to you.  There are other editors (Mattisse, etc.) who are interested in these topics, so alerting them here is a good way of getting their attention. —Viriditas | Talk 02:13, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately it isn't of interest to me at this moment. --Loremaster (talk) 04:49, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I started it and will work on it.  Mattisse 14:57, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good. --Loremaster (talk) 03:56, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rogers v. Okin
Talk:The Royal School, Armagh

message: Victuallers 09:28, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

message: I just updated the wiki-link to Royal School Dungannon.
Ishq Ali 10:16, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As is common with the Royal School, this article focuses very heavily on the sporting achievements and past history of the school with little reference to current education issues such as recent results, latest Inspection and matters such as that. Many who would visit this page would be interested in the educational achievements and teaching styles without focusing solely on the sport and former pupils. Hate to criticize but it's a school, not a sports club. Its important to mention sports etc. but a bit of variation would help.  Maybe a mention of the current headmaster / vice-principals, the 05/06 GCSE/A Levels results and the standings in the league tables- just to vary it a bit. I'll do it myself but maybe some of the more informed on these details would care to contribute. Thanks c-bro 20:31, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education 

message: I have removed the word "good" from the following sentence: "The good doctor was in the habit of warming himself by this fire of an evening, and was blown across the room by the resultant explosion."  The use of “good” in this context is jocular and deliberately archaic.  Although it sounds charming and genteel, it’s not appropriate for Wikipedia.  As much as Wikipedia entertains us, we should always keep in mind that Wikipedia is reference material first and foremost and such should be as clear and as literal as is possible.  This particularly benefits those for whom English is not a native language as well as those lacking erudition in general.  Thanks.   HouseOfScandal 19:11, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  re: The GOOD Doctor?
Talk:Soloneţu Nou

message: "1046 believers of Polish ethnicity": what does this mean? How is one a "believer" of an ethnicity? -- Jmabel | Talk 10:23, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Original text in romanian is: "Comunitatea din Soloneţu Nou (cu filialele Solca, Plesa, Racova, Arbore) numără 365 de familii cu 1046 de credincioşi de etnie poloneză. " (http://www.ercis.ro/actualitate/viata.asp?id=20040326)  Bonaparte  talk 11:41, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Aha! Because there they are in a context where they are referring to the Roman Catholic Church. So it is referring to Roman Catholic believers. But the word only makes sense with that context. I'll deal with it in the article. -- Jmabel | Talk 21:21, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Jerzy Różycki

message: Intro says he was born in 1909, the categories 1906. You'd hope that it's one or the other and not both dates which are wrong. ～J.K. 10:38, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for spotting that; the category was wrong. — Matt Crypto 15:14, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Gibraltarian/Proposed decision

message: Regarding this proposal:
"3.3.6 Sockpuppets
5) The actions of all users reasonably believed, based on IP used or style of editing, to be sockpuppets of Gibraltarian shall be attributed to him and charged to his account"
it has already been discussed elsewhere that User:Gibraltarian uses the largest ISP in Gibraltar. The overwhelming majority of anonymous Gibraltarian users will therefore edit from the same IP range as User:Gibraltarian. The effect of basing a sockpuppet claim solely on IP edits (and then maybe backing it up by saying the user edits Gibraltar-related pages) is likely to see most of the nation banned. Unfortunately, I understand that is already the case on the Spanish Wikipedia - we really shouldn't risk shutting out most of Gibraltar from the English-language Wikipedia too, jguk 11:04, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

message: If anyone wants to see the emails I get from Gibraltarian every day (along with literally 50 copies of "UNBLOCK ME NOW", here ya go. --Woohookitty(cat scratches) 13:02, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Btw
Talk:District of Franklin

message: The following text was on the disambiguation page (and was removed), which contradicts the information here.  I'm not Canadian; I don't know anything about this.  Is there anyone who can fix this issue?  Thanks.  Neonumbers 11:12, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That doesn't gell with any NWT geography I'm familiar with, so let's leave it removed. Radagast 20:45, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Info conflict
Talk:List of terrorist incidents in Iraq since 2003

message: Needs a REAL cleanup. --HanzoHattori (talk) 12:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow, this article is a mess 

message: I just added a few suicide bombings from March and April to the list, from the list it looks as if there are no suicide bombings at all, anymore. But actually it's just that no-one is bothering to update it... The Honorable Kermanshahi (talk) 20:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Update the article

message: This page is huge.  I would like to go through and split it into pages by year.  Any objections? MBisanz talk 03:00, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting 

message: In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 
* "CIVCONTCAS" :
** http://icasualties.org/oif/Civ.aspx
** http://icasualties.org/oif/Civ.aspx The dates for these attacks may be inaccurate as they often relate to belated victim-identification press releases; the casualty figures are also incomplete as they exclusively count foreign civilian contractors. Replacement citations would be preferable
DumZiBoT (talk) 17:16, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot report : Found duplicate references ! 

message: In the July-August period of these year there were many suicide bombings (at least died 50 people because of them) and nobody put them in the list. I know that is a bit difficult following every suicide bombing in this conflict, but with a little of work it can be made (as I did with the suicide bombings in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict). There must be somebody who could do this work. Thanks.--AndresHerutJaim (talk) 07:40, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why nobody keeps counting daily the suicide attacks in Iraq?
Talk:MV Aurora (1977)

message: I've placed this article under a "start" grade. It has a fairly comprehensive detail of the ship yet it still lacks and so I'm not 100% sure it should be placed here rather than in a "stub" grade. Perhaps a more experienced wikipedian could shed some light on this. --Drew Lindow (talk) 03:34, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project Alaska Grade
Talk:Sun Ray

message: Although it says in the article that 'Sun developed the separate secure bitmap-based network protocol "ALP" (Appliance Link Protocol) for the Sun Ray system', I wonder if these little machines can do plain old X-forwarding, without using the proprietary and possibly limiting Sun Ray Server software.
Sun Rays require Sun Ray Server Software.  And SRs and SRSS talk to each other using ALP. --Toomuchham 21:12, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  X compatibility 

message: How well does the SunRay protocol/server software handle streaming of videos and flash content ? More specifically, would streaming a 640*480 movie at 24bpp be too much to ask ?
It's surprisingly good, especially with SRSS 3.1, which is much less of a bandwidth hog than its predecessors. Flup 10:41, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video performance 

message: the link for 
"Appliance Link Protocol"
in this article links back to...this article.
it would be nice to have some detail on ALP either in this article or a separate one.  a comparison with VNC would be especially welcome.
thanx -ef —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.38.203.239 (talk) 13:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  deja vu  :-) 

message: So the JavaStation mention has been reworded to provide more background detail. The problem is, this reads like very obviously like editor expertise and not like it's from a source. Any official documentation on the history of Sun's diskless workstations? Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 21:33, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, but official's not a secondary source, now is it? :-)  Added a news article for citation.--NapoliRoma (talk) 22:26, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Succession" text 

message: We should present a reference that a NeWT is in the CHM's collection. Searching their collection on the website, I can find a stand for the NeWT here and a purple thing they describe as a "Sun Ray prototype" here. Are we claiming that the purple thing is a NeWT? -- Finlay McWalter ☻ Talk 11:39, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: In Computer History Museum

message: Since Sun is now owned by Oracle, that should be reflected in the article text. --HelgeStenstrom (talk) 12:35, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Now included in the lede and infobox.  No objection if anybody wants to try improving the lede or more explicitly mention the acquisition of Sun by Oracle.  jæs (talk) 16:52, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oracle
Talk:New World

message: The "New World" is a eurocultural term applied to the majority of Earth's Western Hemisphere, specifically the Americas.
I did leave the term linked to eurocentrism, because that does provide useful context. 
I must confess that I do get a bit hot under the collar over the reverse bigotry implied by blindly lumping "New World" under eurocentrism. 
"New" was effectively a synonym for "unexplored" and this was not a European construct. None of the peoples of the New World possessed even rudimentary maps of the continental extent of the Western Hemisphere, and most likely every native population had a different (and incompatible) human origin story. 
As a result, suitable non-Eurocentric vocabulary for the entire enchilada was extremely thin on the ground. 
I suppose the optimally inclusive solution was along the lines of LGBTQ+, with an additional letter or symbol added with each distinct population encountered, thought that might finally have become bulky with 28 distinct languages groups now identified in North America alone. — MaxEnt 00:34, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked at that map again. You actually need to add the legends on the left and right together, so 28 is a vast underestimate. — MaxEnt 00:42, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eurocentric changed to eurocultural
Talk:Women's International Terrorist Conspiracy from Hell

message: Hi, is there any reason that this page needs to go through a consensus process to be moved? Or any reason that it needs to be moved? How about just doing a redirect? An An 02:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course! I was going to remove it myself since I didn't see any discussion forthcoming from the proposer! --Lox (t,c) 07:57, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was Move.  WP:NCA states a guideline with an exception, "Avoid the use of acronyms in page naming unless the term you are naming is almost exclusively known only by its acronyms and is widely known and used in that form".  This does not qualify under the exception stated.  —Wknight94 (talk) 02:35, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Oppose - the article itself makes clear that the acronym stands for more than one thing. -- nae'blis 00:34, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: For some reason the article page is not showing up correctly.  I;ve been through the edit page but cant see anything odd.  All other wikipedia pages are showing up fine.  Can other people see it OK? 81.155.202.7 20:07, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems viewing article page

message: I'd like to know since when were decisions allowed to be made with no consensus? If you look at that "debate" above there was no consensus but merely TWO people making OPPOSITE statements that is NOT consensus by any stretch of the imagination... --174.45.184.184 (talk) 17:48, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Consensus
Talk:Cederberg

message: The spelling is now generally accepted as Cederberg, not Cedarberg.  This is a combination of the English spelling and the Afrikaans spelling 'Sederberg'. Zaian 11:57, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cederberg or Cedarberg

message: The tree is generally known as the Clanwilliam Cedar, even though botanically it should be called a cypress. Which should be used on this page?  I believe that the common name should be used in the article, with a short explanation of the technically correct name. Zaian 16:14, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clanwilliam Cedar or Clanwilliam Cypress

message: Is the Cederberg part of the Cederberg Mountains or vice versa? Or are they one and the same? --Jwinius 22:28, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cederberg Mountains

message: Is this about the 100km long Cederberg mountain range, or is this about the ~65,000 hectare Cederberg Wilderness Area? There should be two articles.  Leo Breman (talk) 16:51, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Topic of article is confused.
Talk:Jack Woodford

message: "As an ex-banker and one who has scuttled quite largely about this country of ours, I give you my solemn word of honor that I have never seen any other class more corrupt, conscienceless, and thieving than bankers."
Does anyone know if this is the same Jack Woodford...Smallman12q (talk) 22:10, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote 

message: We don't really do quotes in articles, so I moved the lot of it to WikiQuote. If anyone wants to help source it, I'd be much obliged. It looks like it'd be easy enough work, but I've got stuff to do today and can't really do it right now. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)  16:03, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotes 
Talk:Rainham, Kent

message: Does anyone know anything about a decommissioned military base in Rainham? Its now under elms stone way I believe, is this correct? a name for the base or any other info you have would really help me out because I'm falling flat on my face so far. -- Shimirel (Talk) 21:51, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Elms Stone Way" dosen't ring a bell with me, you don't mean the old base where Gillingham business park is ? Pickle 13:32, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Elmstone way does exist. Is it the Army camp that then became the Camp school that you're referring to? 80.194.52.135 (talk) 15:57, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military base 

message: I've just read the item on facilities/shops in Rainham. Is any of the "This used to be (insert name here), and then it was (insert name here) and now it's (insert name here) in any way notable (or noteworthy or interesting/useful)?Plingsby (talk) 10:04, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree ! It seems to be confusing and muddled.  DavidAnstiss (talk) 17:25, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical shops 
Talk:János Kodolányi

message: He spent some time in concentration camp for his support of workers and his "strong nationalism". Gubbubu
I haven't heard that before or anything like this, none of his hungarian biographies states anything like this (he kept in contact with nationalist movements, but he never spent a minute in work camps, I think - but that is true he was prohibited to publish his works). I think this is a missinterpretation or misstranslation, no serious source I've found. Gubbubu 12:55, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are some mis-translations on the page, kind of.. word-by-word rendering of the Hungarian text. E.g.: "Ego csipkebokor" is rendered as "flaming thorn". A native English speaker would probably understand "Burning bush" better. 
Also "Criticas" (?) the author probably means Kodolany's works of "literary criticism"
I would not mind touching up the text here and there, along these lines, 
but I would do so only if encouraged by the author. 
Utna pisti (talk) 22:09, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some of the page's text is somewhat mis-translated.
Talk:Pilot light

message: Hmmm.
Slight inaccuracy? Or maybe someone dropped figures instead of rounding.
Seconds in a year = 31557600
240W for 31557600s would be 7.57GJ
500W for 31557600s would be 15.8GJ
So rather than '7GJ to 15GJ per year' one would think '8GJ to 16GJ per year' would be more accurate.
Or was there some % of downtime for the pilot light? Perhaps.
Not that this is in sigificant error...Since the error in measurement is likely to be bigger then bunged rounding.
:I computed them using units.  The calculation went the other way (from energy to power).  The numbers are probably wrong anyway  - 500W would have a noticable warming effect on a hot water heater and would probably cause the water to boil over a day (a kettle is only 5times more power).  I rounded to nice looking numbers (the precision is probably less than 1 sig fig).
 You have: 73 therm
 You want: GJ
        * 7.7000692
 You have: 73 therm/year
 You want: W
        * 244.00568
:njh 22:58, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've heard of "power on" lights on devices, machines, etc, being called a pilot light, but don't know if this is common enough to warrant mention in this article.  Thoughts, anyone?" --Badger151 (talk) 14:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  electric pilot 

message: "During the American colonial period..."   Really? you mean a candle? How did they light the "pilot" light? I find this bit of information reaaalllly suspect, especially with no citation. Gimelgort 19:28, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magic lantern
Talk:Maladolescenza

message: Link to very shady "official" website removed. —84.146.169.173 13:00, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does the first paragraph sound like POV to anyone? --JB Adder | Talk 12:30, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the first paragraph because it just looked like a small review to me, and those haven't really any place in an encyclopedia. I left the remaining as it was useful non-POV information, and then renamed the section as "Trivia". -- Northgrove 22:24, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Maladolescenza#Information|Information]] section 

message: "Lara Wendel made a few more roles and retired". These "a few more films" are 18 cinema films besides TV films, etc! Also, she "retired" 15 years later. Behemoth 13:20, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lara Wendel

message: The following was removed a few months ago (not by me), but seems like it should be included in the article if some references can be gotten for it:
When Maladolescenza came out, it was decried as child pornography[citation needed] almost immediately, and the film was banned[citation needed] or heavily cut[citation needed] in many countries. The uncut and unfogged version is considered legal in some countries today, such as Austria where the company "X-Rated" released it as a DVD in 2004, but it was declared illegal in Germany on July 28, 2006.[citation needed]
QVanillaQ (talk) 01:23, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed content

message: I'm almost positive this is an error. "Unsimulated" implies that the actors had actual sex. My understanding for a long time is that the actors were merely lying on top of each other. The one external reference here, the link to the Netherlands legal document, backs up that there was no actual sex in this movie. 100.0.174.15 (talk) 23:01, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Unsimulated" sex
Talk:Mary Livermore

message: This article definitely refers to the same subject as Mary Ashton Livermore, and I agree that the two should be merged.
Contradiction: Early years and education section states that she graduated from seminary in 1838.  First sentence in Career then states that she graduated in 1836, which seems to be a direct contradiction.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheedMan98 (talk • contribs) 18:54, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes 