Talk:Pope Nicholas V

message: No, this page has since been corrected.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Storm talk (talk • contribs) 23:40, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did the papal schism end really? 

message: Sentence corrected and clarified on July 28, 2011.
I cannot make an understanding of this, "His father died... etc.",  so have desisted from any editing. It appears to be two (perhaps more) seperate sentences clumsily merged into one. It awaits someone with more patience and skill than me.LessHeard vanU 19:00, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second sentence, second paragraph 

message: I found this page after seeing Pope Nicholas V mentioned in the preface to a passage from Date's Inferno, though I can't actually find the mention in the poem's text itself (haven't read it closely yet). Could be a typo? Since there are footnotes describing references to Nicholas III. Warrants a further look, at the least. []
Yuletide (talk) 23:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention in Dante's Inferno? 

message: There were two infoboxes using the Template:Infobox pope styles with the only difference being different pictures for the two. I have surrounded the old with comment tags so it is still there if the need arises. I cannot see why there would be two seemingly contradicting pictures, however if someone else knows better which one should actually belong please correct me. Thanks,  Adwiii  Talk  01:56, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Papal style boxes 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Paus Nicolaas V door Peter Paul Rubens.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on June 30, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-06-30. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:21, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Paus Nicolaas V door Peter Paul Rubens.jpg]] to appear as POTD 

message: Paragraphs 5-10 of the biography are almost adulatory.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Egospoon (talk • contribs) 00:35, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure there are, but they would initially be found, if anywhere, in other articles on these subjects. Johnbod (talk) 01:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral? 

message: Why is birth date given as 11-13-1397? Other sources give it as 11-15-1397 http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11058a.htm https://www.britannica.com/biography/Nicholas-V-pope Thisdaytrivia (talk) 06:00, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth Date 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pope Nicholas V. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110728080300/http://www.synodne.org/article.php/20070507103958523/print to http://www.synodne.org/article.php/20070507103958523/print
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:15, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I think it is worthy to note that the illustrators of the Nuremberg Chronicle did not avoid reusing a woodcut of a king or a pope for several different prints of kings or popes that they were not particularly familiar with. Therefore I think that the picture of Pope Nicholas V from the Chronicle used in the article is unhelpful. In fact, this picture was clearly produced with the same woodcut as that of Pope Stephen on page 120v of the Chronicle and of Pope John II on page 144v, just with a slight colour change.
As this picture was clearly not intended to be a meaningful interpretation of what Pope Nicholas V looked like or how he was historically perceived, it is misleading to have it in the article.
:Hi. Two things. First, no one is contending that this is actually how Pope Nicholas looked. Secondly, despite woodcuts being reused, we at Wikipedia use the Nuremberg Chronicle as illustrations on other pages. It is perfectly fine to have this depiction here. I hope you understand. Thank you SleeplessNight12 (talk) 06:22, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Per "no one is contending that this is actually how Pope Nicholas looked", I don't think that's correct, the basic assumption is probably that illustrations like these has priorities besides how things actually looked. Also, the presence of illustrations from the Nuremberg Chronicle in other WP-articles neither supports or oppose such an illustration in this article, see WP:OSE. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:19, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Sir, I am at loss here. Every depiction of every single pope before the middle ages were made centuries afterwordsSleeplessNight12 (talk) 16:57, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pope Nicholas V as depicted in the Nuremberg Chronicle