Talk:Moeller High School

message: The History section of this article is copied directly from Moeller's website.  I'm working to rewrite it, so that it doesn't violate our copyright policy.
 – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 19:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation

message: I see that this athletic section has no mention of Gerry Faust, who coached there from 1963-1980 and, quoting from the article about him, his remarkable 174-17-2 record was highlighted by seven unbeaten seasons, four national prep titles, and five Ohio state titles in his last six seasons  --rogerd 23:27, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of Gerry Faust? 

message: Please show some restraint when adding names to the "Notable alumni" list, especially with regard to athletes. I realize that many of the athletes that've been added are well-known in the Moeller community, but in the big scheme of things, they might not necessarily be "notable" enough for Wikipedia. I commented out names of college athletes whose sole description on the page was the sport they play and the school they play for; if there's something that makes these athletes notable, feel free to mention that and add them back in. While you're at it, if you know a good amount about these athletes and they seem noteworthy enough, please consider writing an separate article about them. It's not really helpful to the average reader when they see a list of names, sports, and schools, and know nothing more about these people.
(Yes, I went to St. X, but that's not why I pruned the list a bit. After all, I know one of these guys. I'd just like to see this article reach a level of quality that won't require a "references or sources" sign at the top.)
 – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 00:23, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Much agreed. Hold back on the "Notable" Alumni and Faculty. If they have an article, by all means, include them. If not, think twice, and, if in doubt, ask on the talk page (that's here).--Unionhawk Talk 17:54, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable alumni 

message: :Image:Moeller.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the discussion was no consensus to move. —Angr If you've written a quality article... 11:30, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Moeller.jpg

message: Why does it say 1 of 6 all male schools?  I count only 5.
Moeller
Elder
X
LaSalle
CovCath
Who is the 6th?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyleralf (talk • contribs) 12:58, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 5 or 6 all male schools?

message: It seems that any content that paints Moeller in an unpositive light is swifty deleated, disregarding its accuracy. This was done a while back when a sentance was taken down regarding the ineffectivness of Moeller's laptop program, and I have constantly tried to post the following to no avail. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thetruthmustbeheard (talk • contribs) 06:21, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for posting your concerns.  The issue is that you are offering information that is tainted with subjectivity and bias.  Wikipedia entries must be written from a neutral point of view WP:NPOV and and must be verifiable WP:V.  If you post information in objective language with sources, it has a good chance of remaining.  -- ForgottenManC (talk) 11:15, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. Everything that is not neutral or verifiable will be challenged first. Things that are both will be removed. The statement in question had a  tag, and was unsourced. This is not censorship, this is ensuring NPOV.--Unionhawk Talk 11:49, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

text: oh. in that case, (seeing history) not censorship, just not what wikipedia is about.--Unionhawk Talk 14:12, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Censorship concerns

message: They even have listed the dates of when the accused Marian clergy worked at the school. https://www.wlwt.com/article/marianists-identify-16-priests-brothers-with-local-ties-accused-of-sexual-abuse/32961467 Even the Cheverus High School article has included sex abuse accusation details, so I see no reason why this shouldn't either.2601:447:4080:10:59B7:FF01:64E1:419F (talk) 19:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: The school is cooperating on sex abuse