lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Andersonstown News

message: Where is it from (what country)? "Republican" will have a very different meaning depending on the answer! -- Jmabel 23:20, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed the word it bold as the letter was not made public, therefore the word is not accurate:
The newspaper was satirised in the Portadown News website as The Angrytown News. The Andersonstown News contacted the employers of Newton Emerson (the creator of Portadown News) with a list of exaggerated complaints about the site - resulting in Mr Emerson being forced out of his job.
--Theosony (talk) 23:36, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 
Talk:FIRSTwiki

message: For an August 2004 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/FIRSTwiki
----
I'm not sure what the proper citing should be for something copied form another GNU FDL wiki (90% of the content copied was written by me).  Also, are interwiki links preferred/allowed/deprecated/disallowed/etc on wikipedia?  --Iammaxus 23:38, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Ross and Cromarty

message: I've updated the 'Other Industries' and 'Population and Administration' sections. Other sections I've not touched, although perhaps only the agriculture one is really in need of updating. Average Earthman 23:40, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The area covered by the Geography section is that of the constituency, not the county, the district or the lieutenancy area? Laurel Bush 11:25, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography - of constituency? 

message: I am dubious about this: 
:the 
Ross and Cromarty county constituency (consisting of the mainland area of Ross-shire and Cromartyshire, minus parliamentary burghs within the county constituency).
The Western Isles constituency was not created until 1918, and I imagine prior to that date Lewis was in the Ross and Cromarty constituency. Laurel Bush 10:25, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constituency 

message: I note the article is defined currently as being primarily about a Highland Council committee area, which seems to be a somewhat emphemeral concept, unlikely to survive long in its current form. I understand these committee areas have no legislative definition and are purely Highland Council inventions, defined in terms of lists of wards. The council can not control the development of ward boundaries and the relevant Boundaries Commision is not constrained to respect committee area boundaries. Boundaries are expected to change dramatically in 2007 (to create new multi-member wards). Therefore committee areas are likely then to have quite different shapes, and perhaps also different names. Laurel Bush 16:15, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There definitely needs to be a transfer of content to Ross. The latter article is of quite shocking quality; if I were to devote time to improving it, in most cases it would just overlap with the content of this article. Calgacus (ΚΑΛΓΑΚΟΣ) 02:28, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't understand what you mean? Calgacus (ΚΑΛΓΑΚΟΣ) 15:47, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Committee area as primary subject of article 

message: Wikipedia:Content forking: the landscape section of this aricle overlaps totally with Ross, Scotland, and is also repeated at Ross-shire. I propose to move anything that isn't about the existince of Ross and Cromarty in administration/local government over to Ross, Scotland, with appropiate links to ensure that this artice is found by those who arrive here. Any thoughts/objections? Grinner (talk) 12:23, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have done the above. Grinner (talk) 12:56, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Content forking
Talk:Chinese philosophy

message: I'm transferring here some comments left inside the article source at the end of "Concepts within Chinese philosophy" section. _R_ 21:54, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: What are the main philosophical schools of thought in contemporary China? Specifically I'm interested in how orthodox Dialectical Materialism is promulgated in the PRC. Based on the way Chinese law and economic academia comes mainly from the Anglo-Saxon tradition, I would guess that Analytical Philosophy is the most influential in universities. Although I suppose Phenomenological philosophy would be more Marxist leaning. Also the CPC has promoted a revival of traditional Chinese philosophy, especially Confucianism.
If you could recommend websites books or journal articles, that be great too. I'm more interested in mainstream "official" philosophy of the universities, as opposed to dissident philosophers. --Gary123 (talk) 18:40, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, you might be wrong, phenomenology is having more attention from Chinese scholars than analytic philosophies, and little influenced by Marxism.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuphrer (talk • contribs) 17:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Would you have any links discussing phenomenology in contemporary Chinese philosophy? Not questioning your claim simply very curious. Jessesmoot (talk) 03:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: What are the main philosophical schools of thought in contemporary China?

message: About how do those ancient philosophers influence modern Chinese society.
DOI:10.1080/09585190903239757  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CaptainJoseph (talk • contribs) 01:18, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add a reference 

message: chinese philosopher / philosophers of art and his / their respective theory / theories of art 136.158.28.229 (talk) 06:45, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  aesthetic 

message: See:
Talk:Legitimacy of Chinese philosophy 76.20.184.116 (talk) 19:37, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section "Chinese philosophy as a philosophy" is gross and ahisorical.
Talk:Modern dance

message: you may have noticed that i am heavly editing this page, i am attempting to make the information more usefull and clear,
expresionism, postmodernism and contemporary dance all have pages now so some information can go there. also the artists involved should have thier own pages clearing up some of the more verbose statments here. 
lastly a linking of the artists to show the transmissiom of dance that was not clear in the first version.  Ohka- 00:08, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro 

message: if you know anything about those links that are red please enter some infromation even if it is a stub
thanks  Ohka- 22:22, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  help 

message: I've added a  template feel free to add new articles to it. Stirling Newberry 00:35, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modernism template 

message: I merged this small section from a small article, then had misgivings. I see that they are two different things, but there is much overlap with modern dance. I think that cleaning it up within this article will help, and maybe someone can clarify differneces and similarities. If this section gets developed to a great degree it may eventually deserve its own article. Chris the speller 18:55, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern ballet 

message: Is this edit ok? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Modern_dance&diff=prev&oldid=29228001
--Roland2 17:34, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Section deleted by anonymous user

message: I dont see anywhere in the article the rather important concept of "fall and recovery" theory of movement that was especially important to early modernists. is it anywhere else? VanTucky 18:15, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I also feel that, as a modern dancer myself, it is hard to get a feel for exactly what style of dance modern is from reading this article. I would consider adding more of the aesthetics of modern dance (types of movement, music, feel, etc) to compliment the notable dancers' names and general historic information. Isabelhb (talk) 17:29, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  The article offers plenty of scope for improvement. If you can spare the time to look up the key facts as you describe, taking care to reference the books or journals that you use, that would be very helpful. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:32, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  important omission 

message: Dance theatre, combining elements of dramatic presentation and dance, may be considered a separate art form. Originally this type of performance was predominantly American, though the term Dance Theatre was adopted by an independent theatre founded in Wuppertal, W.Ger., in the mid-1970s by Pina Bausch. from Encyclopædia Britannica --Espoo 23:52, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "tanztheater"
Talk:The Estée Lauder Companies

message: There first job 2600:100C:B055:A6B0:26E1:BFC6:9F17:F0CA (talk) 03:39, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Estee lauder 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: page moved.  Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:10, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The Estée Lauder Companies →  – WP:THE suggests omitting articles from titles by default. A quick search of unaffiliated sources brings up uses of lowercase "the" from the Washington Post, Associated Press, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, ABC, and The Guardian. While it's also not hard to find counterexamples using "The", the point remains that capitalization is not . Also: unlike examples of the Coca-Cola Company, the New York Times Company, and the Hershey Company, the Estée Lauder Companies logo omits the "The". Hameltion (talk | contribs) 03:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 September 2023
Talk:HMS Jaguar (F34)

message: @sturmvogel 66 why do you keep undoing my edits about those from the Irish Republic killed aboard her? I am citing my sources correctly and it is an important piece of historical information given Ireland's neutrality in the conflict. If I am still in the wrong, please explain to me how so I can learn. DanSheehan1522 (talk) 16:51, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There were thousands, if not tens of thousands of people from the Republic that served in the British military. As such a few killed aboard a destroyer doesn't merit any mention in the article.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:57, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits
Talk:Peter Strasser

message: On the German WP it says that he joined the KM on am 16 April 1894, which would make him 18 and not 15 as it says in this article. BoH 08:35, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Paroxetine

message: User:Nadiafadia
"It appears to be similar to a number of other SSRIs."
Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:40, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Not sure why this was removed

message: I see this hasn't been discussed however, for the sake of a large Anglophone group in the Western World (including New Zealand, as well as  a multitude of other South Pacific Island nation-states who purchase from Australian companies), I think the Trade name 'Aropax' should be included for searches by readers. I believe that the addition of one more Trade name is not a contravention of WP:NOTADVERTISING, nor is it WP:UNDUE/WP:PROMO any more than are "Paxil and Seroxat" (already being used in the lead). These may be common trade names in the US and/or Britain, but those names are never used over this side of the Anglophone world.
Please note that I am officially declaring that I have absolutely no WP:COI issues on this matter. I have no affiliation with any drug companies, nor do I know anyone who works for, distributes, etc. for any drug company. I have had no one approach me and ask that I endorse the product.
Note, also, that I am adding an addition reference which seems to be heavily drawn on, but not declared for this article available @ this link. There may be some problems with the article, but I'll run a check using the Wikipedia & other tools available before I comment further. Iryna Harpy (talk) 02:10, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of 'Aropax' to lead 

message: The ki's listed would benefit from (1) clarifying the source data point instead of adding references to the table header and (2) using only the minimum number of references required.―Biochemistry🙴❤ 22:39, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Binding profile 

message: This article repeats itself. In the introduction, right below the tables of info and facts, the adverse effects of Paroxetine are laid out. Then, below in the section named "Adverse Effects" the exact same text is used. This is redundant information that should be removed to keep the article as concise as possible. I would propose that the first occurence of this text should be removed. However, I do not feel it is my place to edit and remove such a large portion of the article.
//Jonte 94.255.206.141 (talk) 14:40, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article repeats itself
Talk:Ampersand

message: The History section of the main article states that the ampersand can be traced back to the 1st century AD, yet the side bar shows the time period as ~100 to present. 101 was the start of the second century, and I doubt the intention was to say that ampersand usage started at exactly 100 AD. I imagine one place or the other needs to be corrected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FakeAlvinT (talk • contribs) 13:47, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  History and Time Period 

message: I've replaced the JPG image (ew) with one that is hopefully better, in Adobe Garamond Pro.  The "italic" ampersand is a bit different from the old image, though, so I worry that this is incorrect.  I can replace it with one in a different typeface if this is the case. neckro 07:31, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I wish you would use a different typeface.  The "italic" ampersand is really not typical. -- Dominus 12:40, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: >Although common in handwriting before typewriters came into widespread use, the ampersand  has lost popularity in recent years, and it has become standard in most contexts to write out the word "and." 
It is certainly more often used in logotypes than in flowing prose, but this seems to suggest that it is no longer used at all.  If someone can think of a way to write this, I'd appreciate it. --Mdwyer 16:32, 2005 August 31 (UTC)
:"Use of the ampersand & and": a discussion on Blogdorf about the use of the ampersand.
:It might well be usefull to expand on when and where the use of & is tolerated in formal use such as academic works and essays — Preceding unsigned comment added by Empty hat (talk • contribs) 03:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage 

message: It reads, "However, while the ampersand was in origin a common ligature in everyday script, the Tironian et was part of a highly specialised stenographic shorthand," in "History" section of the current revision referring to . I noticed, however, that the referred page does not say that the Tironian et is a stenographic shorthand, but merely that the Roman ampersand and the Tironian et are different forms of shorthand which are developed independently.
Though I know that Tironian notes are developed for stenographic purposes and the description would be correct, I think it is better to replace the reference with another page or book that mentions about stenographic characteristics of the Tironian et.
I am now trying to translate this article for Japanese Wikipedia. I will omit the description in the translated article for the moment. ObladiOblada (talk) 04:30, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stenographic characteristics of Tironian et
Talk:Elkhart, Iowa

message: The map displayed in this article is INCORRECT!
Although the latitude and longitude coordinates given in the article are correct, the current map is showing Elkhart located in Warren county, NOT Polk county where it belongs. The red dot should be located in the northeast corner of the county directly above the county in which it is currently located. A map confirming this can be seen at the following Iowa State University URL:
http://ortho.gis.iastate.edu/drg100/client_drg.cgi?zoom=20&x0=456602&y0=4626973&action=pan&pwidth=1600&pheight=1200
Elkhart is located in the center of the map linked above. You can use the surrounding towns, as well as the county boundaries in the upper right and left corners, as reference points in assigning the correct location to the article map.
I do not have account priviledges to correct this error, so I am informing you of this. -- 207.177.12.138 (comment originally inserted into article text as a comment.
:I'll take care of it. -- Seth Ilys 03:34, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Category talk:America

message: I split off the Caribbean nations from :Category:North America into their own :Category:Caribbean countries. I think that's a more useful distinction -- America divided into four regions, not two. Besides, North America was already incomplete: it was lacking those countries listed under :Category:Central American Countries. –Hajor 04:32, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: North America

message: Consensus keep, see discussion for details.  ∞Who?¿? 00:52, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cfd 23 Aug 2005
Category talk:Algebra

message: 'What is to the be the distinction between what we put here and what we put in "Category:Abstract algebra"?'
: I suppose if the topic deals with something abstractly enough, you'd put it in Abstract algebra. If you read Abstract algebra, it may give you a guideline too. Dysprosia 22:30, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Abstract algebra isn't just different algebra, it's something that resembles algebra but it isn't really. It resembles algebra because both use strictly enforced rules to transform one expression into another, and the expressions have symbols representing variables, perhaps constants, and operations on their values. But the variables and operations in an abstract algebra aren't necessarily numeric, and therefor the rules for manipulating expressions are accordingly different. Examples: A Boolean algebra has variables having either the value "true" or "false", the operations include "and", "or" and "not", and the rules include De Morgan's laws. Permutation groups are an abstract algebra that isn't commutative. Applications: Scientists and engineers depend on algebra, but abstract algebra is used mainly to employ professors and justify research grants. Exceptions: Rubik's cube (but that's a game), quarks (but only to describe the symmetry), and computer programmers (who really can use De Morgan's laws). Art LaPella 17:07, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Abstract algebra is not high school algebra instead it is analysis of abstract systems. I can use it in a lot of ways. I could it in geometry. There are all of kinds of ways.http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Algebra.htmlTimothy Clemans 20:25, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Abstract algebra is a flavor of algebra.  Mathematicians consider "algebra" to include many kinds of algebra, some of which are more abstract and some less.  I find the current separate categorization into "Algebra" and "Abstract algebra" confusing and unsystematic.   Why is algebraic geometry in the category "Algebra" but algebraic number theory in "Abstract algebra"?  There are many such questions.  Suggestion: Either get systematic, or put all "Abstract algebra" articles into the category "Algebra". Zaslav 12:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Algebra category vs. Abstract algebra

message: what is the one thousant prime number?
the one thousanth prime number is 1
find the rational roots of 3x^3+2x^2+x+1=0
Italic text  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.244.255.62 (talk) 11:47, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  maths
Talk:Uncontrolled airspace

message: I think that everything after "All airspace above a certain..." in the first paragraph should be removed.  The United States does not have uncontrolled airspace above controlled airspace so the blanket statement that all countries do this is wrong and the example of FL660 in the United States is obviously wrong.
The FARs say "Class E Airspace consists of: ... the airspace above FL600" (with a few exceptions in Alaska and other places).  This is also in the AIM.
--66.88.133.80 01:17, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll change it for now as this appears correct to me; anyone else have any input? —Cleared as filed. 02:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class G doesn't exist above class E in the USA 

message: I've done some pretty drastic surgery to this page as it seemed to be getting out of hand and branching off into a variety of merely semi-related areas: this IMHO has caused the rewrite-context tag to be added.
I think the new version is more punchy, is internationalised and yet has a better context for non aviation folks.  If you don't like it, feel free to rv.BaseTurnComplete 10:28, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major changes
Talk:Steel Panthers

message: It's a good game: it've played it! but where are the citations? seriously!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.25.81.163 (talk) 22:10, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations?

message: What is SPCAMOS? I'm not a diehard fan of the game, I'm considering whether I want to play it and the acronym should be spelled out somewhere. OOB should be spelled out the first time it's used, not the second. Yes, I'm being hypercritical but this is an encyclopedia.
173.184.17.16 (talk) 23:02, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picking Nits
Category talk:Transgender

message: Wouldn't simply "Transgender" be a better name for this category? The "-related topics" suffix seems redundant, considering that's what categories are all about. Bryan 05:51, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I did that in order to keep it in line with the :Category:Gay-related topics first created, and to avoid deleting it outright. But I think your point is fairly pertinent - what do you suggest? Dysprosia 05:55, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm. I didn't see those categories before. My personal feeling is that all of the "-related topics" bits should be removed, but this isn't really my field so I'm not going to press for it. If that's what the consensus turns out to be, though, I'll offer to contribute some of my elbow grease changing links and such. Bryan 06:14, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think we should remove deadnames from the pages for trans people or make them more hidden. Information is important, but I don't see how much use deadnames have except enabling transphobia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.63.246.114 (talk) 02:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deadnames
Talk:Barry Levinson

message: The new image can qualify as fair use and is copyrighted. Unlike the old image, it has lo-res solution. Cool picture!!! Adnghiem501 02:00, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: There's a Template:Martin Scorsese that lists all Scorsese's films, and I really think that Levinson's notability as an Oscar-winning director might merit the consideration of making a similar box. Granted, Scorsese's arguably a different tier, but it's just a thought. --Lawikitejana 11:22, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox/template time? 

message: what gives? no filmography, even? --Jdb00 05:23, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article is totally shoddy! 

message: I'm no english major, but shouldn't the second sentence (listing notable film's of Levinsons)use semi-colons instead of commas? Normally I wouldn't care, but one of the films ("Good Morning, Vietnam") contains a comma in its title. This may make for some confusion if someone reading the article has never heard of this movie and thinks that "Good Morning" and "Vietnam" are seperate films. 121.220.203.87 (talk) 09:16, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar of the second sentence