lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jeremiah Arkham (character)

message: Egghead appeared as one of the inmates Jeremiah Arkham loosed on Batman in Shadow of the Bat. Accordingly, I have added a link to his article.--67.142.171.26 (talk) 20:45, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Egghead 

message: It took me a while to understand what was happening with the Arkham Reborn section of the article. Arkham Reborn was printed as a 3 issue story arc. It was also reprinted as a trade paperback and collected other issues including Detective comics 864-865 and that is the source used for the section. It took me a while to realise where the "extra" plot must have come from - Arkham Reborn 1-3 does not include any Zsasz subplot - but I figured it out it must have come from the other issues, otherwise I might have marked it . 
I'm assuming the section is accurate and the confusion is because I have not read all other parts added in the collected edition. This section could be clearer if the citation was broken up and the individual issues referenced. I'm adding this note here to help clarify it for any other editors who might only have read the individual issues but not the Trade Paperback. -- Horkana (talk) 01:40, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arkham Reborn
Talk:FH Joanneum

message: The naming conventions for articles on Austria tell us to call schools that don't confer doctoral degrees colleges. I edited the article accordingly in December 2020. In April 2021, another editor undid the edit and now calls the school a university of applied sciences again. Is there any reason why we should ignore the naming conventions for articles on Austria in this case? --K1812 (talk) 07:54, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: As no one has brought forth any reason why we should ignore the naming conventions for articles on Austria for more than a week, i'm changing 'university of applied sciences' to 'college of higher education'. --K1812 (talk) 13:22, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type of educational institution
Talk:Peter Fox (rugby league, born 1984)

message: Suggest that this page move to Peter Fox (rugby league) and the coach that is currently there move to Peter Fox (rugby league coach) following the Hull KR wingers move from Peter Fox (rugby league footballer).Londo06 11:57, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: He died of a heart attack on Friday 1 march 2019 Realkreek (talk) 18:32, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Died
Talk:Any Day Now (TV series)

message: I think that the beginning of this section with "The show is set Birmingham, Alabama in the 1960s, during the peak of desegregation." is wrong. The show is set in the present day and has several flashbacks to the 60s. Since most of the show happens in the present day it is wrong to state it is set in the 60s. Dollvalley 08:23, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Setting

message: Mats Haldin disputed the validity of the external link added by myself, considering it spam.  I feel that including the ichannel's airing of this show is relevant to Canadians who are interested in viewing it.  This is why I initially included it.  He felt that it was spam and so I relented, in that I am a new user.  I am, however, returning it as an outside link so that people know where to view the show.  
My reasoning is that Lifetime TV is listed in the external links section for what appears to be the same reason.  I feel that this is a healthy precedent for the inclusion of other television providers who carry this program.  If anyone other than Mats, feels that this is an abuse of wikipedia to wrongfully promote the ichannel website, please add your comments here.  
If the external links on this page become overbearing, I will be happy to remove this link.
If he continues to exclude it, for what seems to be blindly applying anti-spam rules, I would like to solicit the help of user FT2 who has a history of peacefully and professionally resolving disputes.  I feel that this is more productive than going back and forth reverting changes and making issues personal.
Thank you,
Robbiejackson (talk) 14:55, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dispute

message: A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion 
or exclusion of episodes and characters, as well as other fiction articles. Please 
visit the discussion at 
Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 11:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters
Talk:Kimberley Busteed

message: If you really believe a Miss Australia winner is editing their own entry on Wikipedia I think you have rocks in your head. I think they have better promo opportunities than this site.Garrie 05:12, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 7th largest website in the world...eeeeh...PanydThe muffin is not subtle 22:19, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Back of Beyond

message: I have created this article with just a shell of information. I plan to expand it over the coming days/weeks. Sterry2607 08:31, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start of article 

message: I think this is mid-importance for Australian cinema - it is highly regarded in the history of the Australian documentary, and receives significant academic attention. But, low-importance for world cinema. Sterry2607 (talk) 11:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance
Talk:New Zealand E class locomotive (1922)

message: This is a good page. Perhaps the person who wrote it would consider looking into providing a more detailed page on the EO Class. I have said some of what I know but it is not much! Thanks :)
203.173.200.40 08:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to do my Wikipedia editing in fits and starts.  I did this E class page as it caught my eye due to the relative obscurity of the locomotive.  I've been meaning to get onto the two EO classes for a while.  Look out for some editing in about a month or so when university winter holiday boredom sets in. - Axver 11:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Charlton automatic rifle

message: The listed muzzle velocity is probably a bit optimistic as it reflects .303 British as fired from the original Lee Enfield, which doesn't need to vent gas to power the action. 78.105.3.47 (talk) 14:20, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Skennerton's Small Arms Identification Series No. 13: Special Service Lee-Enfields... Commando & Auto Models lists the muzzle velocity for the Charlton as "2,400ft./sec approximate", so that would seem to be the correct muzzle velocity. Commander Zulu (talk) 23:54, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The infobox states that the weapon was semi-automatic, then lists a rate of fire that certainly looks like a fully-automatic arm.  The lede states that it was fully automatic.
The second paragraph is a bit confusing.  The arm is either fully-automatic, with or without a semi-automatic setting, or it's semi-automatic.
YodaMcFly (talk) 22:24, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Action? 

message: The wiki page puts the fire rate at 600 RPM while the official manual/pamphlet gives a fire rate of "approximately 700 RPM". With another source saying "700-800" RPM. 
Where did this 600 RPM come from? Lemonater47 (talk) 05:04, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fire rate.
Talk:As Thousands Cheer

message: There should probably be a mention in this article of the use of the "Happy Birthday" song in this musical, possibly the first use of the song with those words in public, and the lawsuit of the Hill sisters, authors of the song, against Irving Berlin - see http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/rbrauneis/happybirthday/hillvharris/Hill_v_Harris_Depositions.pdf 
GGG65 (talk) 03:41, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Cyril Berry

message: Does anyone know when CJJB was born?
Jonathan Headland 09:43, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Aparently Cyril had a home brew shop on Church Road in Bristol, but I can't find anything other than ancedotal evidence to varify that.  (Zpeterson 10:24, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homebrew shop 

message: How could anyone think this? Mr Berry was the author of a major best-selling book (two million copies and still going), not to mention all his accomplishments in his field. APW (talk) 08:21, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not notable!? 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Timeline of trends in music (2000-present)

message: ====United States and Canada====
*Hip hop music becomes the most popular musical genre with American youth. Eminem looks set to become the best selling music artist of the decade selling around 80 million albums by the end of 2006. 
*Rock has remained very popular, despite the increasing popularity of hip-hop and rap music. It has recently significantly recovered, however, from its all time low in 2004 (23.9% of the music market)  .
*Children's music rises significantly in sales , with acts such as The Wiggles becoming successful.
=== Year by Year ===
====2004 in music ====
*Music of the United States
**Gwen Stefani of the ska-pop group No Doubt goes solo. Her album Love. Angel. Music. Baby. goes triple platinum.Hooper, Joseph.  ELLE.  "Escape Artist".  Retrieved February 27, 2007.
That's all, folks.  Serpent's Choice 09:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Everything left when the uncited material was removed

message: ====2004 in music ====
*Music of the United States
**Gwen Stefani of the ska-pop group No Doubt goes solo. Her album Love. Angel. Music. Baby. goes triple platinum.Hooper, Joseph.  ELLE.  "Escape Artist".  Retrieved February 27, 2007.
That's all, folks.  Serpent's Choice 09:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year by Year 

message: *Music of the United States
**Gwen Stefani of the ska-pop group No Doubt goes solo. Her album Love. Angel. Music. Baby. goes triple platinum.Hooper, Joseph.  ELLE.  "Escape Artist".  Retrieved February 27, 2007.
That's all, folks.  Serpent's Choice 09:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2004 in music
Talk:Shivers (album)

message: I have removed potentially copyrighted content (short album description) and replaced it with my own short sentence :)
Thus, hangon tag is also placed. Thorthesleepy 09:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good enough for me. Speedy deletion tag removed. LittleOldMe 10:01, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Colin Blythe

message: The article seems to have been abandoned mid-development a while before BlackJack was banned for sock-puppetry. I've had some sections I've worked on tucked away and have done some work on those today, partly to deal with some obvious errors in the military service section. I'm sure I'll make mistakes and be generally useless, but there are some other draft sections that Sarastro1, who has produced many excellent FA-quality articles but who is largely retired, that were shared with me ages ago which would probably be worth working in. They, along with some other sources I have decent access to, should mean that we can move away from a) the year by year approach to the article; b) the use of scorecards and queries as sources (we have better prose sources for nearly all of this). I have one section that is close to ready, but wanted to make sure that nobody has any pov they'd like to share first. Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Early life section done and added. The lead is very much a work in progress and the order and sectioning will change quite a lot as things get added so some of the flow might be disrupted for a while. I'm not planning on rushing this. Blue Square Thing (talk) 10:02, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

text: Cricket from 1898 to 1905 done for now. The more checking the better. Blue Square Thing (talk) 18:00, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Working through this
Talk:Kirk Ella

message: This may be useful resource for expanding the article. Keith D (talk) 19:43, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Resource
Talk:Pentomic

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 20:34, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: This article is about changes in the organisational structure of US Army Divisions. The Pentomic structure was not established in 1775, but during the 1950s. --One Salient Oversight (talk) 07:24, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of Category:Military units and formations established in 1775
Talk:IPython

message: As per the admin edit on my talk page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ianozsvald
I have added the hangon tag requesting a review.  I have expanded the original material to cover two of the main strengths of IPython.  
Ianozsvald 10:09, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hangon
Talk:Colin de Grandhomme

message: State YES, or NO, if you believe this article should be kept or deleted, and give any comments you feel on the subject. The Rypcord. 05:59, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because the article asserts that the individual competes at the 1st division level, which satisfies WP:BIO.  Note also that satisfaction of WP:BIO is not necessary to survive speedy deletion, as long as notability is asserted. -- But|seriously|folks  06:02, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion On Speedy
Talk:Kampfgeschwader 55

message: I added citation from Bombing of Stalingrad in World War II. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:45, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That is the first addition you actually made. Congratulations. It is said without analysis, which I will add when I get round to Stalingrad. Dapi89 (talk) 07:39, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raid on Stalingrad, August 23 & 24
Talk:Westonka

message: "Westonka" seems to be a well-established term (roughly judging by Google). Notability is not an issue here. Adding "expand" in place of "importance". --B. Wolterding 10:41, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability established 

message: I'd guess that 75 years ago, it had not yet been invented. Nanabozho 15:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did the term come into use? 

message: I just added the link to this wiki that I started. If we need to discuss this, please use this page. I watch this page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nanabozho (talk • contribs) 01:41, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Westonka Wiki

message: I reverted a sentence about Westonka and Tonka Toys. Maybe it does belong here? Nanabozho (talk) 23:10, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope of the page
Talk:Helen Parrish

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drives
Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips for writing better articles. —Yamara ✉ 18:47, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: The fourth paragraph is unfinished. Can someone supply the necessary info? Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 08:32, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Career
Talk:Devín

message: It'd be wonderful to have something in detail here about the origin of the name.
My belief is that the name pre-dates the Štúr orthography, and also pre-dates Slovak settlement in the area, which has two results that I see:
*Representing the name as Slovak/Slavic, instead of just Slavic, is problematic. If you accept this, then:
*The spelling děva would more accurately represent the root word.
Though really I have too much Bratislava on my plate to get too worked up about it myself.  Hopefully someone with better source material at hand will come along and make a miracle happen :). MikeGogulski 10:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name history/origin
Talk:Presidential Airways (scheduled)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:54, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Presidential Airways (charter)

message: In the article it is stated All aboard, three soldiers and three civilian crew members, were killed. Several of their survivors filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Presidential in October 2005.  How can there be any survivors if all aboard we killed in the crash? Tolstoy143 - "Quos vult perdere dementat" (talk) 20:31, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You may have misread; the article says their survivors (i.e. their surviving relatives) -- not the survivors... FWIW Untrue Believer (talk) 10:47, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparrent Contradiction
Talk:Mickey Goldmill

message: Was micky a ggod coach? He didn't seem to teach Rocky any boxing skills. Is he responsible for Rockys brain damage? 2A01:4C8:823:62AE:9186:4C58:1583:4A59 (talk) 12:11, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: yes i think mickey was a great coach he taught rocky alot like never give up even if it hurts 208.114.95.5 (talk) 00:31, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Micky
Talk:Colorado Cricket League

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:48, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Category talk:English Football League players

message: This page and this category is really meaningless - and should be considered for deletion.
"The Football League" is a term sometimes used to include the English Premier League, the Coca Cola Championship and League One and League Two. Its component parts used to be known by other names, but it always consisted of the top (approximately 92) professional football (soccer) clubs in England and Wales. There have been simply thousands of players for these teams over the years. 
From the title of this category, it is not clear whether it should list all of those players who have played in this "league" over the years or, only those who played for this "league" when it was actually known by the name "the Football League" or  only those who are currently playing for clubs in this "league".
It is confusing to the point of being meaningless.
Even if its part of the Wikipedia Project as described on the Discussion page, it should still be considered for deletion.
Colin marks (talk) 07:17, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Air Afrique

message: It seems that Air Afrique had leased a L-1011 from Gulf Air at the beginning of the 1990s: http://www.airliners.net/photo/Air-Afrique/Lockheed-L-1011-385-1-15-TriStar/1015371/L/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaamboo (talk • contribs) 06:43, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leased aircraft 

message: Just dropping these links here, will expand the corresponding text later :)     --Yaamboo (talk) 06:58, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles related to Air Afrique on the Jeune Afrique website 

message: * http://www.airafrique.eu/ seems to be a personal website with a lot of information on the company... Not very reliable as a source though.
* http://aerobernie.ae.funpic.de/Air%20Afrique.html contains a description of the fleet.
--Yaamboo (talk) 09:35, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More external sources 

message: It seems we can use these according to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Defunct Airlines#3000 photos now available. :) --Yaamboo (talk) 13:10, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Also  according to . More ORTS templates with airliners.net here, but you need to read if they can be used on all pics at Airliners.net or not. --Yaamboo (talk) 13:15, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 

message: Paris–Fort Lamy–Dakar–Brazzaville
Shouldn't "Dakar" be "Bangui"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by FromTheVillage (talk • contribs) 04:38, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. It is supported by a reference.--Jetstreamer  10:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I just realized you were *dis*agreeing with me, I thought you were agreeing -- which is why I had done the change (which you subsequently undid).  I now have re-done the change and added a reference, a web page with an image of the route network in 1973.  I can also (or instead?) add a reference to the Central African schedule from the same page, which clearly shows the Brazzaville-Bangui-Ft. Lamy-France routing.  FromTheVillage (talk) 23:53, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this correct?
Talk:The Obsolete Man

message: The resemblance to a swastika is nebulous at best. The design is actually a pair of diamonds (such as on a playing card) one atop the other, joined at the tips. This would appear to be a symbol of the "The State", and not necessarily a military insignia, as it also appears on civilian shirt collars. The diamond motif is repeated on The Chancellor's shirt, with three diamonds aligned horizontally over the heart. This may be intended as an indicator of rank or status within The State's hierarchy.
Art Carnage 05:38, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shirt insignia ≈ swastika?  

message: Is this new Chancellor good and believe in Democracy. I am saying he declared the old Chancellor obsolete. Plus the guy who sets in front of the Chancellor is still there. So I believe that the new Chancellor MAY or been put into office by a vote. But it would probably be by a board of preselected people. totalitarianism still exists in the state. So Mr. Wordsworth's plan did not 100% work. However his plan may have a long term effect. (i.e. in ten years they will get the Right to Vote, in a few Weeks, Free Speech).(Dan of knowledge (talk) 00:01, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The New Chancellor 

message: Six hours is too short to be considered to be around the clock.  The chancellor surely meant 36 or 46 hours.  ````  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.143.10.145 (talk) 02:11, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  around the clock
Talk:Chopper bicycle

message: I suggest that this page be a redirect to Raleigh Chopper, which is a much more complete article.  Lyallp (talk) 23:44, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, there is a big difference between your average Chopper and a Raleigh branded chopper, two distictly different beats! Thaf (talk) 09:27, 30 January 2009 (UTC)