Talk:Donghak Peasant Revolution

message: Any change necessary?--Seonookim (talk) 01:29, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change 

message: this was posted by error inside the GA review(1) and got the following comment:
:Just so you know, this is the closed review that you're posting in (which closed as "not listed"); I'm not sure that's what you meant to do. The current GA review is elsewhere on the page. Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:56, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another comment 

message: I have rewriten the references related to the books, in order to use the template  inside the text and regroup the detail of the references at the end, where they can be managed more easily. Apart from this technical move, I am now exploring what are saying the references used at History of Korea. Moreover, the subsection Role played by Donghak seems to be a central one, that should be developped and seperated from the 'fringe' controversies about the Daewongun or the Genyosha. On the contrary, the 1994 다시 피는 녹두꽃 was not only a commemoration of 1894, but a part of the movement that resulted in the 5.18 Special Law passed in 1995. I will try to work on that. Pldx1 (talk) 18:14, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Bibliography

message: And this was also posted by error inside the GA review(1) Pldx1 (talk) 16:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not by error, but I have no problem with this being moved here. That said, I'd like to see a reply. The article still has cite needed tags and as such is in no way in the form to pass a GAN in the current state. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:52, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments from Piotrus 

message: Whoever passed this as a B-class for milhist: no, the citations are not adequate, there are dozens of uncited paragraphs. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:13, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class failed

message: This article cites a bunch of authors & books (Donghak Peasant Revolution#Other books) with the name/title "미상" (misang). "Misang" means "unknown" or "unidentified" in Korean. These cannot possibly be valid citations. Citing an "unidentified" book is tantamount to admitting you don't know what book you're trying to cite and you've never seen it.
Some of these might be books that were cited in the Korean version of this article (e.g. "The Founding of Cheondoism" by "John Misang" might be 이돈화, 《천도교 창건사》 (천도교중앙종리원, 1950)). Others I'm not sure. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 14:37, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: , in the edit I linked to, you reorganized the bibliography to use harv refs, right? Did you use "9999" as a placeholder for years and "???" for pages? – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:37, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bizarre citations 

message: The lowest estimate for their forces is 3000, but the casualties are 6000? 2A02:1810:251F:EE00:7477:49EC:CD84:BECF (talk) 16:33, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualties of Korea and their soldiers 

message: Surprised that even in the Korean article there's no picture for the event in the infobox. Can anyone find or draw anything for it? toobigtokale (talk) 02:03, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No picture?