Talk:Dhofar War

message: The numbers given for Iranian forces involved seem excessively large; over three times the strength of the Sultan of Oman's army committed to the campaign. Perhaps the verbatim quote ought to be given. Did the figure perhaps refer to the total number of Iranian soldiers who were "rotated" through Dhofar over several years, rather than the maximum strength at any one time ? HLGallon 02:50, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Imperial) Iranian committment 

message: PFLOAG known widely as "adoo"? This wouldn't happen to be the Arabic word "adw", or "enemy"? If so, slightly one-sided...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.95.69.221 (talk) 13:50, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Balance?

message: Oops! For my last edit, read Jordanian *contribution*, not contrition. Jordan had reservations over placing units under British command, but not over its participation. See Akehurst, We won a war for details. HLGallon (talk) 00:04, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jordan 

message: The image :File:PFLO flag.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:00, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with File:PFLO flag.png

message: This article mentions India's participation. Is this true? --Miacek (t) 10:36, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  India's committment? 

message: I AM PRETTY SURE.....THAT THERE WERE WAY MORE MEMBERS IN THIS WAR
IN FACT THE BATTLE OF MIRBAT itself....had 400++ adoo in the attack
there were probbly more than 4-5000 peronnel!
and this information currently on display aint even sourced!--Pranav (talk) 13:31, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NUMBERS OF TROOPS OF THE REBELS / ADOOS 

message: PLEASE ADD BATTKLE OF MIRBAT PAGE
ITs pretty well written
and needs to be linked to this page for sure!--Pranav (talk) 13:44, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  can somebody create a campaign box - add BATTLE OF MIRBAT PAGE 

message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGMX_oBpDKQ Man74 (talk) 16:07, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  thames television report on the war in 1972 

message: The poster says that it's against SHIAS not communists.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.98.158.14 (talk) 16:09, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect translation 

message: This was added by Paulissinoua (talk) on 1 March, 2022, this year. I consolidated the references to the source (orientxxi.info, ) used by Paulissinoua but left the claim intact. It has recently (12 March, 2022) been removed twice by A sprmcy (talk), with reasons given, but reverted by Tommi1986 (talk) on grounds of vandalism, possibly as a result of new user A sprmcy inadvertently removing a cite name, leaving orphaned citations in the remainder of the article.
I have removed the claim again. The sole support is a single footnote, with no indication as to its original source, in the orientxxi.info page. Such a contentious a claim needs corroboration from more than one reliable source. I have found none in the existing literature. (The orientxxi.info page gives ample confirmation, if any were needed, of the Imperial Iranian contribution, but should not be regarded as authoritative regarding any Israeli paricipation.) HLGallon (talk) 20:50, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Israeli participation 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 02:00, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Dhofar War (1963–1976) →  – Is there another Dhofar War that would require this to be disambiguated? Charles Essie (talk) 13:59, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 October 2023 

message: @Skitash, Dear brother, I've an objection to your removal of Pakistan from infobox as Pakistan had not so minor role in the conflict, the article itself states that at least one Pakistani army officer was present in every unit. The source I added even stated that the Omani air force had only one surgeon and that was an on-duty Pakistani air force personnel. Moreover, Pakistani troops also actively partook in some battles so you can't just ignore that and call it non-combat involved, an example is Battle of Meerbat, I guess it's called. And it was an action carried out by Pakistan government so you can't call that volunteer action. Waleed (talk) 14:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Battle of Mirbat it's called Waleed (talk) 14:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pakistan