Talk:Saracen

message: - Saraþen: [sarazē] (en dialecte cauchois) m.s. "millet" (panic), "sarrasin/blé noir", &: "Saronide" (classe de Druide faisant partie des Caintes: "satiristes", de Saros: période chaldéenne de 18 ans & 11 jours où la Lune reprend la même position entre la Terre & le Soleil, il fallait entre 18 & 20 ans pour faire un Druide, & compris comme: "mangeurs de millet/sarrasin/blé noir", mot persan donc indo-germanique, reliquat d'un échange culturel entre Perses, Grecs & Galates, cela bien avant les croisades). Les chrétiens détournèrent le sens originel en: "mauvais sujet/homme sans foi ni loi", allant dès le Moyen-âge, jusqu'à confondre ce terme avec celui désignant un Sarrazin. En réalité, Sarrasins était le terme que les Chrétiens du Moyen-âge donnaient aux Druides protecteurs des Vierges noires, identifiées plus tard à la Sara [sombre] biblique c'est-à-dire la Sarasvasti [noire] hindouiste, & mangeurs de Sarrasin: "blé noir". Pour preuve de ceci: Escorfaut [de l'Escaut, Ecosse ou du keltisk Escob: "évêque"], & Borgons [du norrois Borg: "fortification", de "bourgeois" ou "Bourguignons"], 2 noms de leurs chefs, on ne peut plus "gaulois". Dans: "Histoire des 4 fils Aymon", sont mentionnés: un Guidon de Bretagne [de Gwidoù: "ruse" en breton], & un enchanteur Maugis: "Mage", qualificatif de Prud'homme ou Bon-homme anciens surnoms des Ermites Druidistes [c.-à-d. Enchanteurs comme "Merlin", héritiers du Druidisme gaulois, surnom donné plus tardivement aux Cathares Occitans]. Dans "La légende de Guillaume Fierebrace & Rainouart au tinel", Rainouart [au regard farouche, comme celui du sanglier, emblême gaulois], fils de "Sarrasin", est un Ronan/Renaud, fréquentatif de Rhiannon: "Grande Reine" galloise, via Rigantona: Déesse Mère gauloise). Et pour anecdote: La Chanson d'Aiquin (de 1170/90) décrivant le siège d'Aleth par Karlmagnus, occupée par les Norrois (Normands), parfois appelés Sarrasins… (by O-H de Warenghien, écrivain Normand)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.235.197.52 (talk) 15:42, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: This entire argument is pointless pin dancing and evasion:  The term "Saracen" -- regardless of its origins -- has a specific historical meaning. It refers to Islamic raiders who terrorized the coasts and borders of Europe until 1830 insearch of slaves and booty. The Battle of Poitiers was fought against Saracens, as was the Battle of Navarino over a thousand years later. Whatever they were called, the Saracens were bloody real to the Europeans.ScottAdler 12:22, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  There you go again, turning your attention to etymology rather than real, bloody history. The Europeans may not have known, or cared, where the word "Saracen came from, but they bloody well knew that they were occupied, enslaved, castrated, deported, and robbed, year ofter bloody year. The word Saracen simply meant "Muslim invader" -- Check the article Song of Roland. The Norman French who wrote the poem didn't really know who the Saracens were, or even the god they prayed to, but they knew who the enemy was. If you want to know how horrible the Saracens were, read "Jihad in the West: Muslim Conquests from the 7th to the 21st Centuries" by Paul Fregosi. Its mainly a highly readable but depressing account of wars and battles that the politically correct want forgotten. Read the part on what happened at St. Tropez and St. Moritz.ScottAdler  00:48, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Both the 'thieves' and the 'outside-of-Sarah' theories are mentioned and mercilessly refuted by Gibbon (though the latter without much of an argument). As for ScottAdler's argument: did not both the heading and the original poster explicitly say 'ethymology'? You are the only one pin-dancing trying to invoke bloody war in an argument regarding the origins of a word. For what it's worth: the term 'Saracen' was already applied BEFORE Muhammed was born, so it seems incredibly unlikely the origin of the word has anything to do with 'Muslim invader'. Whether they were horrible or not seems rather unrelated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.243.253.102 (talk) 08:41, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: A Saracen was an Islamic slave raider

message: The second sentence of this Saracen entry is wildly inaccurate:
"The Saracens are credited with many mathematical advances and inventions used in the modern world, including algebra and algorithms, table and bed linens, sherbet and ice cream, and cultivated peaches and strawberries.[1]"
It also contradicts many other wiki entries.
Much has been written and discussed here about the origins of algebra, but as the wiki page about the History of Algebra shows (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Algebra), the concept existed in many ancient societies, including India, Greece, Babylonia and so on; and that the Arabic-speaking mathematician al-Khwārizmī who coined the word "Algebra" was himself actually Persian, not a "Saracen." Same argument applies to algorithm; just because the word algorithm has an Arabic root does not mean that the mathematical concept was invented in Arabia, or by Saracens.
As for "table and bed linens" being invented by Saracens -- what??? That makes no sense. There were bed linens in ancient Rome, and in ancient China, and I'm sure elsewhere as well. I think all of this "information" comes from one non-scholarly book that shoiuld be discounted.
As for sherbet and ice cream, this claim too contradicts other wiki entries, such as this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_cream#Precursors_of_ice_cream , which states that both sherbet and ice cream have complicated multi-cultural origins, and are only perpherically connected to Saracens. If it is any Middle Eastern group that can claim to have invented Sherbet, it is again the Persians, who were not Saracens (except in the later European condemnation of all Middle Easterners as "Saracens").
Peaches? Peaches come from China, and were cultivated there for millennia before reaching the Middle East -- as the wiki entry for peaches correctly states: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peach. And I have never seen any reference to strawberries being a Saracen invention -- everything I've ever read says strawberries are endemic to Europe and were only cultivated to be the large juicy fruits we know today in recent centuries, long after the Middle Ages.
In short, basically every single historical claim in the second sentence of this entry is inaccurate, and I propose that that sentence be deleted.
Jackanape2 00:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete the second sentence of the "Saracens" entry, as it is erroneous. 

message: If a Saracen was the just your average muslim in the street, or (as characterised in the discussion above) a "slave raider" who terrorized Europe and committed barbaric massacres, then:
*Why did the British Army name an armoured car after them?
*Why did the Royal Navy name several ships after them?
*Why was a prominent sports team named after them in Victorian London, by people with no Islamic connections? (Saracens Rugby Football Club, a professional team currently ranked about 3rd in England, which inlcudes a crescent moon and star -- Islamic symbols - in their flag).
The answer: Saracens earned the grudging respect of their English Crusader opponents as formidable warriors.
The article and this discussion does no more than scrape the surface of what a Saracen was.
"Teacher".
:Because the bloody history of the Saracens is largely forgotten. In British history, they were replaced by the Turks, who occupied a slave base on the Engish island of Lundy off Bristol in the seventeenth century, by the "Saley Rovers," pirates from Morocco who prawled English waters until roughly 1700, and by the "Barbary Pirates" who weren't stopped until a decade after the Bombardment of Algiers in 1816. The Saracens are simply overlooked and romanticized.Scott Adler (talk) 08:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a WP:OR argument so not really get into it. The page is however "not complete". If you feel some aspect has been overlooked then maybe you can add to it. I do note however there is linkage between the term and it's military connotations.--Tigeroo (talk) 05:46, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  The generic term Turk was used in the Renaissance for all tribes from that region, including the Saracens who were, however, still very much in evidence.--dunnhaupt (talk) 00:15, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Saracen was a warrior 

message: The article San Sebastiano fuori le mura refers to a Saracen attack on Rome after 826.
Why is it not mentioned here?.--dunnhaupt (talk) 00:12, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Saracen attack on Rome

message: That's all I can say, cause I don't know much about the Saracens, but in reading other sources, I can see that much is missing. Check this out, the chapter on Saracens to begin with:
http://books.google.ie/books?id=t8jQStJcVmAC&lpg=PA172&ots=C8GYyZQMkS&dq=Saracen%20mathematics&pg=PA172#v=onepage&q=Saracen&f=false
89.101.225.125 (talk) 14:25, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is lacking much

message: While it is preferable for images to appear with related text, it is not strictly necessary, and "stacking" should be avoided (WP:STACKING).  There is simply not enough text on this page for both of these images to appear in the medieval section because the second image gets pushed below the body of the article. Further, with so little text, the image still appears near the appropriate text even when placed in the section above.  The images bunched together at the bottom, with the second one pushed out of the body, looks terrible and emphasizes the lack of text. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 13:11, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't going to move the image until there was discussion on the issue, but placing it in the intro is inappropriate.  Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 15:13, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just now deleted the second image because it has no information value with regard to Saracens (it doesn't depict Saracens; see also Auchinleck manuscript), andthen I relocated the first image to the Medieval section. It would now be desirable to find a suitable image for the section entitled "Early usage and origins", but I don't know of one offhand. Seanwal111111 (talk) 16:31, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: In one of the later sections it states that:
:By the 12th century, Medieval Europeans had more specific conceptions of Islam, and used the term "Saracen" as an ethnic and religious marker.
An ethnic and religious marker for what or whom? This whole article isn't clear about who or what the term refers to. I understand that is in large part due to the use of the term in history, but here the article indicates that at some point the term acquired a more specific meaning. It just doesn't say what that specific meaning is. It would be the same problem if I said that the term "moors" was used as "an ethnic and religious marker." The religion is one thing if you are saying that the term Saracens came to be synonymous with Muslim, but Muslims were an ethnically diverse group in the 12th century. Ileanadu (talk) 15:56, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need clarification on the term being "an ethnic and religious marker" 

message: Add Ammianus Marcellinus Bk 14,4,1Pamour (talk) 10:53, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: See also Ammianus Marcellinus († 391-400) and Bk14,4,1. Perhaps the oldest source would be from the 4th century then, instead of the 7th century as mentioned in the article’s first paragraph. Leen 94.212.249.212 (talk) 21:41, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin sources 

message: I just heard a archaeologist (with BBC Coast`s Mr Oliver) describing Avebury stones as sarsens but named for `troublesomeness` in effect, a troublesome thing or person-I have not checked iplayer but is this a valid change/addition? anyone familiar with early local dialect? still saracen root?-Awikiholic (talk) 16:44, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sarsens

message: --Adbouz (talk) 17:28, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sarrasin- Saracen symmetrical slip- 

message: As the opening paragraph frames the term as being used by Christian authors, is it really appropriate to talk about the term being used in the early "Common Era"? What does the frame of reference have in common with a global student from outside the Abrahamic religious groups? Were this a discussion of a word used in Chinese history, would we refer to it as the second century pre-Common Era, or the early Han Dynasty? Some more historically grounded term than this sterilized permutation of the late Renaissance expression "Vulgar Era" would suit the tone and tenor of a historical and religious article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.134.105.139 (talk) 22:34, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common Era? 

message: The word Sarsacen was applied to Arabs before Islam in the Arabia Petrea or the Sinai Peninsula. Turks has nothing to do with it. I hope for modification and not to be confused.,
About the etymology is from Late Latin Saracenus, from Ancient Greek Σαρακηνός (Sarakēnós), which may be from Arabic شَرْقِيِّين‎ (šarqiyyin, “easterners”), Samlaxcs (talk) 23:11, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Etymology is one thing; later usage another. Johnbod (talk) 14:32, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turks+etymology