lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Charles Litton Sr.

message: Nothing here is original research.
:Well that is the odd name wikipedia uses for information that is not from cited sources. For example, if you create a "tribute" article on a relative or someone associated with a company you work for, etc. This person deserves a better sourced article writen in encyclopedic tone. W Nowicki (talk) 20:10, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ainme

message: #REDIRECT Talk:Anime
From WP:RfD:
* Ainme → Anime -- Delete re #4 "Were created very recently as a result of a typo". Speedy rule, technically, but was speedy before when the page content was "Did you mean Anime?", on account of being nonsense, and someone removed the speedy and turned it into a redirect instead. So RFD now. -Goldom 話 貢献 06:42, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Wood Brothers

message: this is simply a press release and provides very little information on the team. The quotes provided are thoroughly pointless and of questionable POV Drdisque 02:13, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can we find evidence that Jordan Wood is somehow connected to this team? --D-Day I'm all ears 16:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jordan Wood 
Talk:Lorne Michaels

message: While I am not sure, and I am by no means an expert at deducing and identifying altered images on the internet, it would appear to my untrained eye that the primary image used to identify mister Micheals is edited. Specifically, it would appear that someone has increased or "streched" the length of his mouth, lips pursed, to visually ridiculous levels. I am aware of some inside jokes that occur here on Wikipedia, such as increasing the size of various states little by little so as to not draw attention to the ruse. It is for this reason that I must ask: am I mistaken? Is Lorne Micheals in fact represented accurately here?
192.77.12.11 (talk) 11:33, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This is, in fact, an accurate image of Lorne Michaels. As he was one of the honorees the night this photo was taken, there are a number of similar photos available from the Library of Congress (1, 2) and UPI (1), as well as the Kennedy Center itself (1). There are also photos from other events (1, 2, 3) where he looks similar. As you will note in these photos, his mouth does seem wider than most people might expect, but that is simply how his mouth looks. -Etoile ✩ (talk) 21:40, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pertaining to the Image used in the info box 

message: (12 years later)  I can't seem to find in the article any mention of when/why (why may be obvious, but still) he changed his name from Lipowitz to Michaels. This would likely be worthwhile information--and help to make this article more properly encyclopedic. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 06:31, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lipowitz > Michaels? 

message: There should be a section added mentioning he was added as a defendant alleging the enabling of Horatio Sanz's sexual abuse of a minor. MisfitBlitz (talk) 03:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The controversy section should be readded as being listed as a defendant is not peripheral and settling out of court does not equal innocence. MisfitBlitz (talk) 07:05, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed again. Micheals was part of a shotgun accusation against multiple people with minor involvement. The case was "dismissed with prejudice" after being settled by the main defendant. Meters (talk) 07:08, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horatio Sanz Lawsuit
Talk:James Thomas Milton Anderson

message: I've added Anderson to the Ku Klux Klan members category. He's also discussed in the article on Notable Ku Klux Klan members in national politics. It might be a good idea to take material from each article to put in the other. I'm not trying to judge whether Anderson was really a member, so if it's inappropriate to put him in the category, feel free to undo my edit. Since membership in the Klan was secret, it's often not possible to get stronger evidence than a statement by another Klansman.--Bcrowell 02:33, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Ku Klux Klan members category.
Talk:Urban shamanism

message: I respect what you are doing, but it might be a good idea to include more concrete information in this article, and possibly to cite references referring to this artistic movement.Crypticfirefly 06:34, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not just an artistic movement, it is a not all that related spiritual 'thingy' too, this article seems to have WP:OR issues. Sticky Parkin 23:03, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A comment

message: The connection to "Komatsu Kiyoko, the founder of a Japanese new religious movement known as Shinmeiaishinkai..." seems very weak. I can't see the how this can be "Urban shamanism" in therms of technological changes and art movements. I suggest that this connection is removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.195.21.122 (talk) 00:47, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. The article on Shinmeiaishinkai doesn't even mention shamanism. It appears in the title of one of the references, but as there are no footnotes, it's impossible to tell what the relation is supposed to be. In any case, to remain in this article, would require a citation in this article. Yworo (talk) 02:47, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't see the connection...
Template talk:User language category

message: This template is a bit « foolish » and « dangerous », because it will add interwikis to foreign pages which do not exist. For example, :Category:User xh. There are no Babel templates and Babel categories in all other languages for xhosa languages. Examples: :de:Kategorie:User xh :es:Categoría:Usuarios por idioma - xh, etc. do not exist.
I think the only one is :fr:Catégorie:Utilisateur xh (with subcategory :fr:Catégorie:Utilisateur xh-1), which I have created just before creating the :fr:Modèle:User fr-1 (linking to :fr:Catégorie:Utilisateur xh and :fr:Catégorie:Utilisateur xh-1). :o) Hégésippe | ±Θ± 19:14, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm trying to replace this template by other ones (as for now I replaced with , and then, I'll nominate it for deletion. CG 10:38, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
== Language category==
It is against wikipedia rules (or practices, or common sense, whatever) to intermix article space with user and wikipedia spaces . Therefore it is improper that this template adds article categopries, such as :category:English language to wikipedia's internal works pages, such as :category:user en. 
Please remove. I would have done it muself, but afraid to screw up the template. mikka (t) 18:26, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: It is against wikipedia rules (or practices, or common sense, whatever) to intermix article space with user and wikipedia spaces . Therefore it is improper that this template adds article categopries, such as :category:English language to wikipedia's internal works pages, such as :category:user en. 
Please remove. I would have done it muself, but afraid to screw up the template. mikka (t) 18:26, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language category
Talk:YTMND Forums

message: Does this page seriously need to glorify a bunch of internet nobodies by focusing on each pointless little piece of forum drama? I don't think it does.--24.9.8.61 05:45, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I cleaned it up, so I took off the header :) Celerityfm 20:14, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Article relevance discussion

message: I started this article basically by piecing together what was originally posted on the YTMND page before the admins and wikipedia mods stepped in and removed it. I don't know enough about the forums to be authoritative here so any help would be appreciated. Please feel free to remove the CLEANUP header at any time if you think it is ready to be removed. Thanks guys. Celerityfm 02:56, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I cleaned it up, so I took off the header :) Celerityfm 20:14, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Category talk:Neologisms

message: I propose that a simple search of the given word at the online dictionary search engine OneLook.com should produce a useful criteria.  A word is a neologism if:
#no results are found (see plutoed);
#all results found cite Wikipedia or its sister projects (see playware);
#the only additional (or perhaps any additional) references are to lists of neologisms (see sheeple and backronym);
This "rule" allows us to gauge the popular use of the term by seeing whether it is referenced in any of the large group of dictionaries searched.  For an example of a term that is currently in the category who fails all three of the above criteria, see homophobia.  This is referenced by more than 10 reputable online dictionaries.  Similar search results ought to be sufficient to warrant removal from the list.—Red Baron 16:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed rule for inclusion 

message: I thought Wikipedia wasn't supposed to have articles on neologism per WP:NEOLOGISM? Deamon138 (talk) 15:41, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allowed? 

message: I'm concerned about the number of multi-word phrases that have been placed in this Category -- particularly in subcategories such as :Category:1950s neologisms. Many of them are catchphrases from popular culture, advertsing slogans, quotes from movies, passages from literature, etc. 
Examples: Charlie Brown, you blockhead; Silly rabbit, Trix are for kids; The name's Bond... James Bond; Have you no sense of decency; Nadir of American race relations; Do not go gentle into that good night; What's good for General Motors is good for the country.
Those were just a small sample. I just don't see how these phrases can *properly* be considered neologisms -- they are merely phrases (consisting of commonly-used words) that happen to have become popular during a certain period of time. 
Frankly, it is incomrehensible that so many of these phrases have been added into Categories intended for neologisms. I am happy to do my share of the work removing these improperly categorized articles, but I can't take on the whole job myself. Can I count on folks here to help out in a big way? Regards, Anomalous+0 (talk) 06:32, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of multi-word phrases
Wikipedia talk:Wikiquette assistance

message: See proposal at Wikipedia_talk:Mediation_Committee#Proposal_by_Xavexgoem.  Please post any comments on the proposal there, not here, so the discussion is co-located. --Noleander (talk) 17:20, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to merge WQA into DRN 

message: There is a thread proposing to close WQA on WP:PUMP/PROP.  ~~Ebe123~~ → report 00:58, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closing the noticeboard 

message: See discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Sanity_checks#Proposal_to_enhance_3O_process_to_also_address_behavior_issues which mentions closing WQA. --Noleander (talk) 14:44, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another thread that mentions WQA
Talk:Melechesh

message: I wonder if the Hebrew transliteration of the band's name is relevant to the article. After all, the band refers to it's own name using the Latin alphabet, which is also the registered name for the band. Thus, all references to the band are using the word "Melechesh", not "מלכאש".
In addition to that, I've read an interview with Ashmedi where he had elaborated on the origin of the band's name - and he had stated that "Melechesh" was actually an incomplete phrase in Hebrew, loosely translated as "Kingfire", and that the actual Hebrew translation of the phrase "King Of Fire" would be "Melech Ha Esh" (in Latin transliteration). If that is true, the Hebrew transliteration would be senseless...
My point is that I'm not sure about the actual significance of the said item. IMO, it rather confuses the reader by cluttering the text - after all, switching between different alphabets always causes a slight delay while reading, and many users (including myself) are not even able to read Hebrew.
I'm not going to remove that bit, I would like to hear your opinion, though. --Vargher 22:10, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I certainly am not adamant about keeping it there.  The reason I decided to do so was because the Hebrew wiki's article () puts the Latin in parentheses and many other English articles do the same, so I felt I was following a convention.  I've removed it for now. --Vagodin 01:34, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hebrew script needed? 

message: I removed the statement made by an apparently anonymous user claiming that Djinn dealt with anti-Islamic topics since it has proven untrue. I've taken a look at the lyrics: although they certainly deal with occult/mythological topics, I did not find any evidence of a direct attack on the Islamic faith.
If Melechesh lyrics contained explicit anti-Islamic statements in a similar fashion to Western bands like Bathory (In Conspiracy With Satan) or Amon Amarth (God, His Son and Holy Whore), the remark would surely be fully legitimated. As this is not the case, it is not aproppriate to speak of an "anti-Islamic" content merely because Djinn deals with Paganism. Vargher 14:24, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-Islamic topics 

message: I took a picture of the band on the METALFRONT FEST 2008, but I'm not sure whether to upload it or not.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deathmagnetic08 (talk • contribs) 09:53, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: The Origins section states that Moloch is of Assyrian ancestry. However, in a video interview with a Finnish fanzine Ashmedi claims that "[his]guitar player is Palestinian". Since, AFAIK, Moloch has been the original second guitarist of Melechesh right from the beginning, this undoubtedly refers to him and would indicate Palestinian Arab ancestry. Anyone ever came across other sources stating this?
The video interview can be found here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ag2n1g8jnnE (relevant section at about 1:15-1:20) Vargher (talk) 15:43, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnicity
Talk:The Life of Riley

message: Move to Life of Riley (disambiguation) and create separate articles for each use. jmd
:Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
* Oppose Philip Baird Shearer 17:58, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Is there any concrete evidence (beyond some random guy's blog) that this Riley clan minted their own money, and thus was a probable origin for the term?  Or even that it is (or was) commonly believed to be so?  If so, a citation should be added.  If not, the section should be removed.
--Matthew0028 14:43, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Riley Coinage

message: The article currently states that the syndicated reruns lasted until Bendix's death in 1964. Is this supposed to imply that the reruns stopped being syndicated once Bendix died? I can't think of any other television show having its reruns ended just because the lead actor had died. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:37, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did the syndicated reruns end? 

message: In the earliest season of the Bendix series, Hans Conreid played freeloading Uncle Baxter, who stayed with the Rileys because he had once given Riley a blood transfusion that saved his life, and Riley felt obligated to let him live with them, even though Baxter had absolutely no interest in earning his keep by getting a job.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.57.229.254 (talk) 18:01, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hans Conreid 

message: Sponsors of the TV show included Pabst Blue Ribbon Beer (1949–50), Gulf Oil (1953–58) and Lever Brothers (1957–58).
Does a line on the sponsors of the show really hold any relevance to the article without a source? I'm indifferent about it and i've already removed an unsourced line about the 'hopes of the fans for the DVD release' so figured best to discuss this second one. MM (WhatIDo WHATIDO?) (Now THIS... I did.) 19:22, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  'William Bendix' 

message: This source has much more detail, but is not reliable - the phrase probably traces back to a ballad about a kidnapping trial in Sligo in the early 19thC.-Shtove (talk) 10:32, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of title
Talk:Unbipentium

message: I thought that was element 143. Remember the g block? 65.80.178.227 (talk) 23:23, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Eka-neptunium?

message: According to the infobox, there was a deletion request back in 2005 resulting in a decision to redirect to Systematic Element Name. Well, ok, no objection to the decision here, but it's nearly five years later and the article is still around-- no redirect. Did I miss a change of consensus or something? 209.236.250.213 (talk) 01:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion Request went where?
Talk:Unbiseptium

message: Unbiseptium might be notable enough for an article since the discussion at Talk: Wikiproject Elements says that unbiseptium had an unsuccessful synthesis attempt in fusion of natural tantalum (180mTa, 181Ta) and xenon-136.  Gcchemistry (talk) 22:10, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's 180mTa, BTW, without an extra superscript for the m. Double sharp (talk) 10:57, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: And even 184 had a synthesis experiment (238U + 238U(!!!), I think, though I cannot recall details), though I would not add that one. Double sharp (talk) 07:12, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recreation of Unbiseptium
Talk:Unbioctium

message: The link does not actually contain any "properties" except those derived mathematically by the periodicity and definition of the topic. The VfD was not ambiguous...there's nothing useful here beyond speculation. The ref is called "properties", but it doesn't support or mention any of the chemical/physical properties assertions in the article. I'll be happy to AfD it or even tag for speedy deletion if you like. DMacks 03:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Screw it. I'm reverting to the #REDIRECT per the VfD. If you don't like it, feel free to file for a review of that community-based administratively-blessed decision. DMacks 03:53, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

message: The talk at Talk: Wikiproject Elements says that unbioctium would be the last physically possible element. That might make it notable enough for an article.  Gcchemistry (talk) 22:07, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recreation of Unbioctium
Talk:The Wrens

message: This article is not great at all.
*Have rewritten and expanded the article - hopefully it's better now. Richard3120 22:48, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Crib Goch

message: Anyone got a better pic ? Gillean666 03:58, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Covers of books (also records, DVDs, etc.) are only usable under fair use criteria, unless the copyright owner is prepared to relinquish his/her rights. Unforunately, that means that the cover could only be used to illustrate an article about that book — we couldn't legally use it to illustrate the subject of the photo (in this case, Crib Goch). --Stemonitis 18:18, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What if we accompany it with a statement about the ridge being _the_ classic 'easy' winter ridge route in the area, as described in the NW climbing guide(s)? Linuxlad 18:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It would still be a breach of copyright, I'm afraid. I think the easiest option is just to get a photographer to go there. --Stemonitis 19:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sadly, I think they'd need several winter visits and possibly a time-machine - I suspect it's several years since NW has had a good sustained plastering of snow like that, and in such good light. (It certainly wasn't like that two weeks ago  - Sunday 11th Feb 07). Bob aka Linuxlad 19:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Wikipedia is no place to make recommendations on where and when to go to a particular location! Alan Liefting 02:07, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Um... wnhy not? William M. Connolley 09:58, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia or climbing guide? 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Crib Goch, Snowdonia, Wales - August 2007.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on July 25, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-07-25. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 17:27, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Crib Goch, Snowdonia, Wales - August 2007.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 
Talk:Konrad

message: This article should be merged with All Tomorrow's Parties (novel), as it makes no sense to have individual character pages for a book that has such a small article. It could easily fit under a "Characters" section, and should. --Blackcap | talk 04:16, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
:That's a good idea Tarkovsky
Looks like the merge is done. --Blackcap | talk 06:48, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to All Tomorrow's Parties 

message: Is this really relevant?
"There once was a man named Konrad.
He liked fire, weed and cookies.
His name was close to a bongrat.
And he loved to watch wookies."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.45.174.58 (talk) 04:03, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poem? 

message: Why is it against the rules to link to other wikipedia articles? Every article I ever read does this! Also, the English version only lists a tiny fraction of the Konrads.HeinrichMueller (talk) 14:06, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cannot link to Wikipedia
Talk:Greyhawk Ruins

message: Please note that a discussion is currently occring on Talk:List of Dungeons & Dragons modules#Info Box Proposal on and Info Box for D&D modules. when format is decided much of the basic info in this article can be incorporated into the info box. - Waza 04:33, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Info Box

message: The eference’s on most of the game modules is just redundant and useless information. The info is often listed some where more appropriately in the article. The References just reference’s itself. How about we fix this or just droop it if there is nothing useful. Dm2ortiz 17:50, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure how familiar you are with academia, but when writing papers, it is standard practice to include all works in the bibliography, even if you're writing about a book. This is because when writing about something, one will refer to it--in this case, the number of characters the module is intended for, level of said characters, credits, etc. In fact, if you check around Wikipedia, you'll find several examples, such as Siddhartha & Ulysses.--Robbstrd 22:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Look up Wikipedia Wikipedia:Harvard referencing guidelines. For an example look at Fidel Castro. If you would like i can send you my collage guidelines on how to write a paper; they go in to detail on how to reference sources and footnotes.Dm2ortiz 14:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See []. "Converting citation styles should not be done without first gaining consensus for the change on the article's talk page."--Robbstrd 03:58, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References (template) 

message: Moving the credits here. These should be incorporated into the info box when cited in the article. Airborne84 (talk) 23:48, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Credits
Talk:Music in the Republic of Karelia

message: Just to comment, I saw a one hour performance by the Karelian Folk Music Ensemble, in a university auditorium, a couple of years ago, and they are a very talented group of musicians.  Very good!  Wikipedia.doug 07:50, 30 August 2007 (UTC)