lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lauterbach, Baden-Württemberg

message: As one of the contributors of the German article I will expand and assess the English article soon. --Hans555 07:41, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually,I started work on May 14, 2007 and are looking forward to reading coments here or on my talk page.  Hans555 talk-- 17:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Finished! Now I'll remove the Inuse Template and will be waiting for responses. Is it correct to assess one's own contributions?? .  Hans555 talk
08:12, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately the article does not use or cite any reliable sources; the German Wikipedia article is not sufficient to show the verifiability of the content. Kusma (talk) 08:49, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding the article 

message: It would be good if you could give references (cite a book etc.) for at least the numbers (population stuff should be attributable to the Statistisches Bundesamt or some Statistisches Landesamt). If you own the books you mention in the references section, it should be easy to find a chapter in them that mentions that Lauterbach was a Habsburg possession. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for some ideas and Wikipedia:Footnotes for a nice way to get citations as references. For example, you could say "Lauterbach has an area of 19.95 km2"[http://www.statistik.baden-wuerttemberg.de/SRDB/Tabelle.asp?99025010GE325036 Statistisches Landesamt Baden-Württemberg or simply "Lauterbach has a population of 3157 (2005) ". 
Other points might need a citation to fulfil the criteria of Wikipedia:What is a good article?, but probably the major points should be clearly referenced and cited for our B-Class assessment (this, however, is something I'm trying to discuss at the project talkj page).
Hope that helps, Kusma (talk) 11:35, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What if the statistics on the web are older than the information retrieved from the Rathaus? --Hans555 08:27, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What should be made [[WP:V|verifiable]] by citations

message: Apparently the naming conventions say this article should be at Lauterbach, Baden-Württemberg. Are there any objections to this? Kusma (talk) 11:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How is an article changed to a different page title and who does it? I found "my" Lauterbach twice on the English Wikipedia Lauterbach (Rottweil) and as it is at the moment. There is no objection to following the convention. --Hans555 12:41, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved it. The instructions are at our (terribly bad) help page Help:Moving a page (siehe auch die deutsche Version :de:Hilfe:Artikel verschieben). Kusma (talk) 13:19, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name
Talk:Wörnersberg

message: Trnalated from dewiki--Buchbibliothek (talk) 22:26, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Cumberland Presbyterian Center

message: The historic building was at:
1978 Union Ave
Memphis TN 38104
(35.134634, -89.995626)
I am not sure where to place this information in the article. --DThomsen8 (talk) 02:01, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates for the historic building 
Talk:Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church

message: ----
This article is a promotional piece for the ARP Church. Not one source is cited that is not related to the ARP church. I am restoring the advert tag.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.101.65.66 (talk) 19:39, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: the allegations are false--none of the footnotes has any connection to the church and thefre is nothing "promotional" about it. Rjensen (talk) 20:06, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Using this template is a lot simpler than going through the article and adding citation needed tags all over the place, but I could do that and put in the third party template or ref improve, if you would feel better about it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.101.65.66 (talk) 20:23, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: okay Rjenson, unless you've done a lot of work to make it appear that you're someone else, I figured out who you are. We are on the same side and have even had some of the same teachers. I can't understand why we're not seeing this page the same way.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.101.65.66 (talk) 20:35, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: no i'm real and I also wrote part of the article (on the Northern Synod) and resent false charges. If something is inaccurate please specify it, and please tell us the secret RS that you are depending on but have not shared. Rjensen (talk) 21:28, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Non-subscribing Presbyterian Church of Ireland

message: I am moving disputed information here so it can be clarified and a consensus formed before placing it back in the article. The first is the original; the second paragraph added recently:
: The ministers of the NSPCI, however, share a common roster with the ministers of the predominantly British General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches (GAUFCC) and NSPCI students study at GAUFCC ministerial colleges.
: Not all  Non-subscribing Presbyterian Ministers keep a close contact with the Unitarians nor are  identified as such. There is no such  shared common roster with the ministers of the  British General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches and Non-subscribing Presbyterian Ministers and only a few have  study at GAUFCC ministerial colleges.
Some items that need to be addressed include:
# definitions – common roster or shared common roster is an inside term and needs to be explained or reworded
# significance – if this information is essential for the article, explain why
# sources – disputed statements beg for sources. For example, who says "NSPCI students study at …" or "only a few have studied…"
✤ JonHarder talk 00:55, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed statements

message: I am going to remove the link to "Remonstrant" in the phrase "Remonstrant Synod of Ulster". The link goes to an article about the Dutch Remonstrants, but the Ulster ones are not mentioned there nor were they Dutch. I am not sure whether what is needed is a red link to an article about the Remonstrant Synod of Ulster or a blue link to Remonstrant; I don't know enough about the Ulster synod's theology to know if that would be appropriate. But clearly the current link is misleading and not informative on the (Irish) topic. --Haruo (talk) 15:36, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading "Remonstrant" link
Talk:Presbyterian Church of Aotearoa New Zealand

message: The section titled 'Breakway groups' appears to be written to persuade the reader that the New Zealand Presbyterian Church had fallen into apostasy and that a split was necessary; it presumes that the settlers found doctrines they did not expect. Combined with a lack of citations, this section could be more of an argument than an objective summary of splits in New Zealand presbyterianism. It may require a rewrite from someone who knows more about the topic. --Hazhk (talk) 22:41, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, as it stands it lacks neutrality and needs to be rewritten. The formation of the RCNZ was undoubtedly at least partially in response to (perceived) liberalism in the Presbyterian Church, but the Declaratory Act in itself could not reasonably be called liberal. However, the information in this paragraph is useful and I wouldn't want to see it deleted. StAnselm (talk) 02:39, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

text: I can't find any specific doctrines mentioned in secondary sources, but I have fixed the RCNZ paragraph. StAnselm (talk) 03:31, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible neutrality issue? 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :George Wallace (New Zealand) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 16#George Wallace (New Zealand) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.   Jay (talk) 14:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "George Wallace (New Zealand)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:William Heath Davis

message: From snippets in google books I think this person was brother-in-law to James A. King and uncle to Samuel Wilder King but not sure. What is the exact source for the connection to Oliver Wendell? maybe confused with the Oliver Holmes that came to Hawaii. Not sure they are related. W Nowicki (talk) 00:58, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted the reference to Oliver Wendell Holmes since I could not find any corroboration of it. --MelanieN (talk) 03:04, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs citations
Talk:Geography and wealth

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
# Support as nominator. ~ trialsanderrors 02:53, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: # Support as nominator. ~ trialsanderrors 02:53, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move

message: I note here a new additional source that is related.  It is a primary source academic article, the best version  I can link to may be pre-publication - at the very least I can't tell where it was published.  On the other hand, it has a June 2007 publication date.  An earlier version was published as a National Bureau of Economic Research working paper in 2006.   It is being picked up by the discussion community, e.g. Brookings Institute.  The paper is primarily about the effect of historical technology upon modern economic development, but does test geography in multiple ways as an alternative explanation (generally finding that historical technology is significant even when controlling for continent or latitude).  The fourth paragraph of section 5 is a discussion of this aspect of the analysis, including a survey of significant sources on the issue.  GRBerry 18:46, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible additional source
Talk:Marah (band)

message: As an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I have removed this link from the external link portion of the page. If any interested editor would like to examine the contents of the page I have linked to, and finds that it is beneficial to this Wikipedia page, please reinstate the link either as an external link or an album review if/when the Angels of Destruction page is recreated. Thank you. *Review of Angels of Destruction! at Crawdaddy!Asst. Editor, Crawdaddy! FenderRhodesScholar | Talk 20:53, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: External Link suggestion
Talk:List of Irish Presbyterians

message: This is populated with a largely pointless list of people who often are nominal at best. The list should only contain those who are known significantly for their Irish Presbyterianism. Otherwise we might as well have a list for Irish left handed people.
That isn't entirely true, religion is important, it is doubly important in a place like Ireland where it is an ethnic marker:  Iris Presbyterians are Irish, in the sense that an Irish Jew is Irish, but a large majority of them are also part of a discreet ethnic group, also in the same way as an Irish Jew.  Some of these people are pretty marginal though, who knows or cares who Rev. Morrow is?  It leaves out some of the genuinely eminent people who are or were Irish presbyterians.  This page should just refer people to the category page I reckon.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Belfastconfetti (talk • contribs) 19:36, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Ridgeway Branch

message: Doesn't the Toms river article cover this just fine? Is a separate page really necessary? Eliz81 19:07, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tributaries articles necessary? 
Talk:Frequentist probability/Archive 1

message: The last change by INic, described as "(fixed the sample space/events-confusion)" was in fact a large-scale revert. This is bad practice. I've responded in two stages, first reinstating the changes reverted by INic, and then correcting the erroneous description of events provided in the substantive edit. On the general question at issue, INic, an examination of the history shows that a string of contributors to this topic have agreed that it's necessary to mention both main views of the issue, as is done in Bayesian probability and Probability interpretations. You may disagree, but you can't just impose your view on everybody else. JQ 22:41, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not imposing my view on anybody. But why can't we leave the dicussion about the pros and cons of different views to the page devoted to that? There are quite a few views (not only two) to be considered. That there are only two views is a part of Bayesian propaganda, not a part of reality. The situation is similar to how communists use to argue. A typical communist claims that there are only two different economical systems: capitalism and communism. All flaws communists see in the capitalist system is then, logically, an argument for communism. This kind of rethoric is called "false opposites". The dangers of this kind of rethoric is when certain minds gets so into it that they can't think straight anymore. And it's really bad when encyclopedias are written by men in that confused state of mind. INic 23:27, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: INic, please note that a further reversion from you will violate 3RR. Regarding your response, it really isn't helpful to use analogies with communism - see Godwin's Law. In any case, no one (except you) is trying to censor references to alternative viewpoints. If you want other views to be considered, add reference to them. If you think no views except frequentism should be mentioned, you'll have to persuade other editors of this. Just reverting edits and abusing other editors is not going to get you anywhere. JQ 00:10, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Please tell me what kind of analogies can be of any help to you, if any. If you read very carefully you will perhaps notice that frequentism is not the only interpretation mentioned in the article. INic 13:31, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stealth reversion
Talk:Chunkappara

message: Please see creation summary reads Created page with unreferenced date=March 2007. Morenooso 03:06, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Really funny. --GDibyendu (talk) 16:52, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd creation summary reads ''Created page with unreferenced date=March 2007''
Talk:Abdullah Abdurahman

message: It is misleading to refer to Dr Abdurahman as "leader of the anti-apartheid African People's Organisation...", since he died in 1940, and the government policy of segregation known as apartheid only came into existence when the National Party came to power in 1948.  Of course, there were segregationist policies in both colonial and post-colonial South Africa prior to 1948, but the term "apartheid" wasn't associated with these policies.202.59.18.126 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 21:52, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: anti-apartheid
Talk:Royal Australian Army Ordnance Corps

message: This article uses a lot of Army and ADF lingo.  It needs to be written where possible so it can be understood from a civilian and international POV.  Such as the previous use of ECN which are not really that relvant.--TinTin (talk) 07:03, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: General POV
Talk:Dynamic Data Exchange

message: This article has a big table in the middle of it, which greatly mystifies me. I'm removing the table.
-74.102.186.243 03:13, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The section that reads "However, this will not prevent existing versions of NetDDE from being installed and functioning on later versions of Windows.".  I suggest this be removed because there's no reference that explains where this is coming from, and is just an opinion. Kasajian (talk) 16:28, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: NetDDE on later versions of Windows
Talk:Don Simpson

message: To anyone wishing to reintroduce the images I've just deleted from the article, please carefully read the appropriate guideline. We don't use unfree images unless they serve a key purpose in the article. And "Don Simpson on the set of blablabla" does not meet the requirements for fair use. Pascal.Tesson 21:46, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: Cause of death was changed from Cardiac Arrest to Heart Attack without citing any source. As the two are not the same thing, I'm reverting it back due to missing source. W4chris (talk) 02:14, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 

message: I grew up with Don Simpson in Alaska and attended the University of Oregon with him. Wikipedia is wrong on two important points.  Like me, Don was raised in Anchorage plus Larry, who was my roommate at the U of O, was Don’s brother, not his son. 206.174.19.72 (talk) 17:13, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don Simpson 

message: I have found that there is a considerable amount of information that can be added using the biography "High Concept" as a reference. I am going to go ahead and expand on this article. Any suggestions, missing information or cleanup is greatly welcomed.  Film_Fanatical10069t@lk 12:49, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding
Talk:Omkareshwar, East Nimar

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:17, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:PBA on ABC

message: I removed the English citation on this page's Infobox, since the anchors use Tagalog 98% of the time.  English as a language for the broadcast is insignificant now, unlike the previous PBA broadcasts especially in the 80's where Dick Ildefonso and the late greats Joe Cantada and Pinggoy Pengson use it much.  Reyrefran 03:19, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: On Medium Being Used
Talk:Keuffel and Esser

message: Eugene Ernst was a vice-president and regional manager of K&E; he was my mother's father. My father also worked for the firm for many years. I have a some albums, in perfect condition, and other materials relating to this company. Before I dispose of this material I thought, first, that someone might want it, and second, that digital images might be of some interest. If I receive no response to this message I will recycle this paper ephemera.
Michael Garrett Blakeslee
Portland,OR
This is a rather backward way of contributing.
Richardsidler (talk) 18:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Here is a 2009 picture of the storefront of 
  Keuffel & Esser Co.
  127 Fulton Street, New York, NY.
  [ http://www.flickr.com/photos/34475189@N07/3205010901/in/photostream/]
Lent (talk) 22:52, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  K&E Storefront Picture 

message: Why is there no mention whatsoever in this article about the leroy lettering system (pantograph) they produced?  It was a standard in drafting rooms into the late 1980's or early '90's until hand drawn drawings faded away and drafting came into the computer age.  while other's may have existed you asked for a leroy and people knew what you wanted, just like if you ask for a xerox copy (made on a cannon, oce, or minolta machine)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.105.133.89 (talk) 06:37, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Mention of what is probably their most lasting product
Talk:Haifa Street

message: Note that "Grenade Alley" and "Purple Heart LANE" were nicknames given to small alleyways running through the slums adjacent to Haifa St., not to the street itself. The street itself didn't need any nicknames.
 - a member of 1-9 CAV, the unit responsible for patrolling Haifa St. from APR04-FEB05 in OIF II
:I'm moving this here since it sounds plausible, we just need to find some sort of source to support it. Bryan Derksen 01:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Mentioning it here would mislead the common reader to think that this was a kind of gesture to the State of Israel or the Israeli People, while, in fact, it was the other way around. Saddam Hussein used this name in order to show that he regarded Haifa as an Arab city. The fact that the Hebrew, Arabic and English names are almost identical makes this political issue a bit confusing (unlike in the case of Jerusalem, for example, where each community has a different name for the city). Since anyone can learn about Haifa with a simple click on the link "Haifa", I think stating it is in Israel is a matter of redundancy. Redundancy is tolerable in most cases, but not here. 79.182.96.139 (talk) 13:21, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Haifa is in Israel, but...

message: I was a soldier in TF 1/9 patrolling the Haifa Street AO in OIF II. The 82nd Airborne unit attached to TF 1/9 was brought to assist in security for the highly conflicted first presidential election. The efforts of TF 1/9 had already brought more stability to the area before the paratroopers were assigned to it. US casualties had significantly decreased, as well as sectarian violence, by October 2004. The 82nd unit was not assigned until November 2004. The misconception probably stems from the notrious reputation Haifa Street had, then the 82nd soldiers enter the area and see that combat intensity is not as high as they were told it would be.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.79.15.131 (talk) 08:27, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combat intemsity 
Talk:Blasdell, New York

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 00:02, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Karl Kroeber

message: This article looks like it was created because the subject has famous relatives, but I can not see that he is notable in himself. // habj (talk) 21:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: full professor of english at Columbia have usually written quite enough to be notable., tho the article is inadequate. Just needs some expansion. DGG (talk) 05:47, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability