Talk:Volgograd

message: I have noticed that editors are simply removing cities from the list, instead of adding the date of the end of the relationship with appropriate citations. It is important to keep the cities on the list, with relevant dates, even if the relationships of said cities have been terminated or suspended. Termination dates with appropriate citations give context to the history between these places, ie the rash of terminations in 2022. Although many cities across the world claim sister status and then do nothing beyond that, many more actually create lasting cultural and economic relationships and should not be discounted. For example, the Italian city of Turin has signed multiple agreements with Volgograd, Hiroshima has sent delegations, there have been multiple student exchange programs, museum/art exhibitions have been hosted, etc. I have added back the removed cities and added citations to any that have termination dates. Erie Bard (talk) 22:04, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sister & Twin Cities in Light of the Russo-Ukrainian War 

message: Kurt Adler was not a 'son' of Stalingrad  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronwalter (talk • contribs) 04:35, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: See Volga River.
some discussion of the battle of Stalingrad, 1941-43, the biggest land battle in human history?
Could someone please bring together the two sections concerning the Battle of Stalingrad? And please use more politically neutral expressions since this is not the Russian Wikipedia (for example: Second World War instead of the Great Patriotic War; the latter sounds odd for non-Russians). I already erased 'German-fascist group' because it didn't sound appropriate. Being objective keeps everybody happy!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.156.230.159 (talk) 09:05, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Was originally known as Ekaterinaberg, N?  Trekphiler 15:50, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Ekaterinburg, or Yekaterinburg as it is usually transliterated today, is another city entirely, in the Urals, and bears that name today. During the Communist era, it was known as Sverdlovsk, after an old Bolshevik. The city, like many others, got its name back in the 1990s.65.13.220.212 (talk) 23:29, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Stalin was not part of the defense of stalingrad (at least in any noteworthy way) during the Russian civil war.  Took it out.  Someone else needs to clean it up.   Your job not mine.  Obviously a Russian (USSR nationalist?) edited the above into the article (many misspellings of a foreign nature as well).  He may come back.
:It would have been hard for anyone to defend "Stalingrad" during the Russian Civil War, since there was no such place at that time. It was still Tsaritsyn then. 65.13.220.212 (talk) 23:29, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong 

message: "Not to mention the unknown number of civilians killed" is a bit awkward.  Needs to be edited, I'll do so later. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Climie.ca (talk • contribs) 15:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  awkward wording 

message: Shouldn't that be 'Steel city' or 'city of steel'? Steel is what stalin means yes? --maxrspct ping me  12:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Stalin" refers to Joseph Stalin, but the word itself does not mean "steel", although, of course, it is a derivative form.  Were the city named for abstract "steel", the name would have been "Stalegrad" ("steel"=, stal').—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:19, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh right, the Stalin biography I have seems to say steel. Perhaps 'steely' though? Or is it proper noun? Thanks. --maxrspct ping me  16:47, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Once again, the city was not named after "steel", but after a person (Joseph Stalin).  "Stalin", of course, is a proper name, which is why we do not translate it.  Hope this helps.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:19, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Like I said, "Stalin" does not actually mean "steel", but it is a good enough approximation when one needs to explain the meaning to a foreigner, since the root is the same.  The word "Stalin" is basically the word "stal'" (steel) modified so it would look like a last name.  There is, however, no such word as "stalin" (note the capitalization) in Russian.  All in all, when a city is named after a person, that person's name is not translated into English, but is used directly.  For example, if some place is called "Uletaysk", it would not be translated to English as "Fly Away" settlement just because "uletat'" means "to fly away", even though the root is the same.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 20:43, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: literal translation

message: I've noticed that the name "Caricyn" is sometimes used as a city in the Volgograd Oblast, and since the article listed "Tsaritsyn" as an alternate name, would Caricyn be the same as Tsaritsyn? --Įиʛ§øç βїʛβяøтњєя Rant | Contributions 21:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is simply an alternative, albeit less commonly used, variant of romanization of the Russian word "", which, as you correctly noted, is the former name of this city.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 02:38, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I understand. I have since redirected the Caricyn article to the Volgograd article. Perhaps a note should be made? --Įиʛ§øç βїʛβяøтњєя Rant | Contributions 03:29, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah, there are zillions of "alternative romanizations" out there.  Can't put them all in the lead.  Redirects are fine, of course.  Thanks!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:39, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Caricyn

message: I have edited it to remove the captions- by a better summary para, removal of too may images, some rewording for brevity. Hope all are happyStarstylers (talk) 16:20, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Latest edit

message: For a city of 1 million inhabitants, there is not much information about this city.  Geography, Demographics, Culture, Economics (there is about one sentence on this, but more would be nice), Government, Crime, Education, etc?  More info please 115.64.28.195 (talk) 21:41, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Much Information on a City of 1 Million People 

message: Who cares about them? Böri (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twin towns and sister cities are meaningless! 

message: Any church, house, even ruins that you can visit?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.138.104.132 (talk) 18:17, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does any of the original architecture remain? 

message: http://www.voanews.com/content/stalingrad-to-exist-again-6-days-a-year/1594350.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/history/world-war-two/9839666/Russia-revives-Stalingrad-city-name.html
Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 14:49, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stalingrad again 

message: There's nothing in Volgograd Synagogue to indicate independent notability. Suggest merging it here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:45, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose merging Volgograd Synagogue here 

message: The Russian version describes seven separate terrorist attacks. The English version shows three.Landroo (talk) 21:53, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrorism 

message: In the history section under Stalingrad, the second paragraph reads:
:In 1931, the German settlement-colony Old Sarepta (founded in 1765) subsequently became the largest area of the city — Krasnoarmeysky. The first institute was opened in 1930; a year later the Pedagogical Institute was opened.
I have a couple of questions about this paragraph:
I.  Are these two ideas related: (1) Krasnoarmeysky becoming the largest part of the city; and (2) The first institute and the Pedagogical Institute. If they are, there should be some explanation as to how they are related. Does the sentence mean the institutes are in Krasnoarmeysky or Institutes in Stalingrad in general? If the former, then this paragraph should be reworded as "In 1931, the German settlement-colony ... Krasnoarmeysky. The first institute in Krasnoarmeysky was opened in 1930. [which is actually a year before the prior paragraph that says Krasnoarmeysky "became ...."]
A search for Krasnoarmeysky Institute provided no useful result. If the two ideas/issues are not related, then they should be decoupled and moved to the appropriate section in the article. Where that is depends on the next couple of questions.
II.  What is the significance of "the first Institute"? Institute of what? Medicine, Health, Education, Art, Technology, etc. If it is a significant accomplishment, then there should be more information provided than this. 
The sentence following the mention of the "first institute" states that "a year later the Pedagogical Institute was opened." Not sure if this implies that the "first institute" was not Pedagogical in nature or that the Pedagogical institute was the "second institute" opened in [Stalingrad/Krasnoarmysky]. In this case, there should be some identification of the type of institute or of its subject matter.
If it is a "pedagogical institute" then perhaps what is meant is "a Russian federal state-owned higher education institution." Language is from the article on Saint Petersburg State University. It can't be the first higher educational institution in Russia nor the USSR, because the St. Petersburg State University was founded in 1723 and still exists today. Is it the first in Stalingrad? Is it the first institute in some other subject matter than pedagogy/education? What is the institute about and what is it "first" in? 
Thus this sentence should be reworded to something along the lines of "The first institute of [Krasnoarmeysky/Stalingrad/the USSR/what it is first of], the [name] Institute of [subject matter/area], was opened in 1930." Note that a semi colon is not proper here unless the two sentences are related and it is clear from the text how they are related.
Is "the first institute" still around? What is it called now?
III.  I think the "Pedagogical Institute" that opened "a year later" is supposed to be "the Stalingrad Industrial Pedagogical Institute." So, "A year later, the Stalingrad Industrial Pedagogical Institute was opened."  A current Wikipedia search for "Stalingrad Industrial Pedagogical Institute" turns up no article, but it does point to "Volgograd State Pedagogical University." It might be helpful to the reader to note this in the text of this article, so: "A year later, the Stalingrad Industrial Pedagogical Institute, now Volgograd State Pedagogical University, was opened." 
I may revise this. If I'm wrong, please revise as appropriate as this is just my best educated guess and not based on personal knowledge.
Are either of these two "institutes" located in the area of Stalingrad that was Krasnoarmeysky? If neither one is, the two issues need to be totally separated. I will be separating the two areas, but if they are related, they should be rejoined and the text should reflect their relationship.
IV.  The significance of Krasnoarmeysky becoming the largest area of Stalingrad - 
(A) Did Krasnoarmeysky become the largest area of the city (of Stalingrad) in 1931 or was it "subsequently" - i.e., after 1931? After I did some more research, it appears to have been immediately upon incorporation into Stalingrad.
(B) A search for "Sarepta" opens up to an article on someplace in Lebanon. A search for "Old Sarepta" opens up a short article for what I think is meant by the mention here of "Krasnoarmeysky" that became a district of Volgograd/Stalingrad in 1931. The article on Old Sarepta makes no mention of it being the largest area of Stalingrad/Volgograd. Is it true that it was the "largest area" of Stalingrad after it was incorporated into that city? In other words, the city became more than twice as large. Is it still the largest area? I will be adding a link to Old Sarepta in the article and modifying the sentence somewhat. 
Is the article trying to say that this addition is important because it used to be settled primarily by Germans, or because of its size. If the significance of its population is important and not just its size, someone might want to tweak the sentence.
Ileanadu (talk) 05:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, the link to Old Sarepta was already there. I just didn't see it. Ileanadu (talk) 06:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I assume Old Sarepta is located in Krasnoarmeysky City District, which is the largest in terms of the area among all city districts in Volgograd, but I have no means to check this. I am pretty sure the story about the universities in unrelated. I will try to see what was the first university founded in Stalingrad and come back here.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:49, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Institute? 

message: In the "Statistics" section of the info box, the information for the city's rank - 12th - appears to be a smaller font than the information for the city's population immediately above it. The font size also looks smaller than the time zone information immediately below it. I don't see where to change the font, so this may be an artefact of the info box template. I can't tell whether I'm right that the font size is in fact smaller, nor, if it is smaller, whether it's supposed to be that way. Anybody know? Ileanadu (talk) 06:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Font size issue? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Volgograd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.vags.ru/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:03, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Volgograd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131105220142/http://www.yerevan.am/3-233-233.html to http://www.yerevan.am/3-233-233.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:25, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: “..despite being taxed "moist" is drier than most of the climate...”; can this be clarified?Rich (talk) 19:55, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean? 

message: Tinezone UTC +4 is wrong,  since 27.12  UTC+3  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.198.192.184 (talk) 14:26, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timezone 

message: Precipitation data might be incorrect. The previous data state that annual precipitation is 16 inches or 406 mm. New data suggest precipitation is half that amount. Weatherbase (one of the citations) states that annual precipitation is 13.7" (348 mm).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Underlinecontrast (talk • contribs) 14:01, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Precipitation data in weatherbox 

message: I’ve heard residents of the city define it as cold semi arid  דולב חולב (talk) 02:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This one is close to 400mm. At best it would be borderline.PAper GOL (talk) 18:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: So maybe we can update it :) דולב חולב (talk) 19:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate