lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chisholm v. Georgia

message: Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. 419 (1793) is considered by many to be the first great 
  United States Supreme Court case. Because of this, there is little background information 
  (particularly in American law) available for it.
This intro sentence doesn't make sense, either it should read 
  Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. 419 (1793) is considered by many to be the first great 
  United States Supreme Court case. Despite this, there is little background information
  (particularly in American law) available for it.
or
  Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. 419 (1793) is considered by many to be the first great
  United States Supreme Court case. Because of this, there is quite a bit of 
  background information (particularly in American law) available for it.
so which is it?
--CVaneg 19:47, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro Wording

message: Can we find a source that this is the case? It seems to be that case when looking at the opinion but how do we know that was the norm "at that time"? -- Karthanitesh (talk) 04:05, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seriatim Confirmation 

message: This article mentions that Chisholm v. Georgia is erroneously considered originally filed through the Supreme Court and considering that this case doesn't seem to fall under the original jurisdiction of the Court, I am liable to agree. But I am really uncertain how to address this in the infobox and other sections of the article other than a note in the background section maybe? - Karthanitesh (talk) 03:08, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Farquhar's Executor v. Georgia
Category talk:Fictional clowns

message: True or false: this category belongs at :Category:Clowns. 66.245.112.43 22:52, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Rly. Where is 'Shakes the Clown'? Imdb here —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.56.52.1 (talk) 10:56, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wot no 'Shakes'?
Talk:Culture of Greece

message: G'day, I recently stumbled on this page and found something that has been looked after with great detail. However, it also filled to the brim with bias and unsourced filler. Since Wikipedia should be sourced and have a neutral point of view, I propose the deletion of all content along the lines of 'this is unequivocally great/beautiful' and that those paragraphs not filled with a single source be culled. Now since I am proposing a drastic departure from the article, and the fact that I am not motivated to go looking for the sources myself (which if I remember correctly is against Wikipedia's policy), I am initiating this discussion so I can get the general consensus of the few who regularly visit this page and not start a massive time wasting edit war. Thanks for reading. IronBattalion (talk) 23:42, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Great Cull
Talk:Contemporary art

message: Hello, I am new to Wikipedia editing. I would like to write that contemporary art no matter what form has an intention to stimulate an emotional response/ feeling from the observer. 
Else JE, Ellis J, Orme E. Art expertise modulates the emotional response to modern art, especially abstract: an ERP investigation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Sep 30;9:525. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00525. PMID: 27242497; PMCID: PMC4876367.Else JE,
Dancergirldiana (talk) 04:44, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I would be hesitant to cite such a claim to a neuroscientist. Many artists work for vastly different goals; it is not unreasonable that that claim might be true, but I would like to see a source for it from within the art world. And even then, I would probably suggest an WP:INTEXT attribution for the claim. — HTGS (talk) 04:44, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contemporary Art focuses on feeling of the viewer
Talk:Language interpretation

message: In my opinion, it mainly consists of unnecessary explanations which can be easily omitted or moved to a different section. It also mentioned some flaws about interpreting, but not in a very detailed way. Itsused (talk) 07:29, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have removed the paragraph "Comparison to translation" 

message: The "Public Sector" subcategory under "Types" is rather difficult to parse, and overly generalized. It does not cite any sources at all, and it is vague to the point that I can't understand what it is really trying to say, and with the last line about how an interpreter can hold the life of someone else in their hands, it even gets a little alarmist without explanation. I would recommend expanding the discussion by going into more detail about each different factor, and including examples. For instance, health care interpreting is a relatively new and growing field, which is undergoing a widespread discussion about what the role of the interpreter should be. See a source: http://memberfiles.freewebs.com/17/56/66565617/documents/The%20role_of_health_care_interpreter.pdf 
This source could be used not only to show an example of the sort of interpreting that happens in the public sector, but also to introduce discussion about how interpreters interact with and affect the environment, people, and conversations taking place. It might be possible to replace the "Public Sector" and "Medical" sections entirely with a more in-depth discussion of the social/moral/legal responsibilities that interpreters have in the various fields and how their role might change according to the kind of interpretation that is needed. For example, the rules governing social interpretation may be much more relaxed than the rules governing medical or legal interpretation.
Elizabeebe (talk) 20:26, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions for improving the "Types" section 
Talk:History of Russian culture

message: Forgot this was a culture article in the second half of my culture summary, which looks like a historical summary. I'll correct that at some point. - RoyBoy [∞] 01:41, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Opps

message: this could easily fit as a section of Russian culture  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.189.94.12 (talk) 19:40, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and  Klbrain (talk) 13:16, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge
Talk:Datawarehousing

message: From VfD:
Redundant with Data warehouse. Offers nothing of encyclopedic merit. Marketing material / resume, smells like copyvio. Anon self-promotional addition. - KeithTyler 23:39, Sep 1, 2004 (UTC)
*This can be redirected without listing here. Meelar (talk) 00:27, 2004 Sep 2 (UTC)
*Make it a redirect and lose its current content.  I can see why it was listed here -- there is information that will be destroyed in the redirect.  In this case, the information present is worthy of deletion. Geogre 00:49, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Devonport, Tasmania

message: The tiny green bit showing the city's boundaries are all but invisible against the grey background.  Is it possible to have a pair of colours that make the area stand out a bit more?  JackofOz 01:04, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Map colours

message: Surely someone would know a bit about the city to expand the article a little? Aaroncrick(Tassie talk) 23:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have spent a lot of time with this article in recent months... it's not perfect by any measure, but it is much better than it was in 2009! CineBrick315 (talk) 12:59, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Devonport

message: The figure of 21k seems a little deceiving. Other then being long dated, it seems Burnie and Devonport (including surrounding areas) are now included as a single entity (or Statistical Division, SD) by the ABS. The population for this SD is around 80k.
Does this mean the population for both Burnie and Devonport should be removed, as its unknown what population is located in Devonport only, as opposed to the SD (for example, like Kingston, which now has no population listed, and its value added to Hobart's)?
Davo499 (talk) 12:41, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Population
Talk:List of Washington cities and towns

message: See also List of cities in Washington State; AND (not surprisingly, apart from the fact that it seems not to have been written yet) List of towns in Washington State. Hey, folks, I enjoy reading these lists as much as the next fella who has rellies living in some of them - but isn't this overkill?
If the three lists are to remain in existence, someone should at least:
* Define "town" in the two that include towns - and give:
** EITHER a reason why and in what precise way it includes large census tracts that are urban areas but are technically just parts of counties
**OR a reason why it does not
* Link from each to the other two.
Robin Patterson 00:25, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Nielsen Audio

message: True or false: the period through which an Atlanta FM radio station exists between the beginning and the end depends strongly on its Arbitron rating. 66.245.116.202 00:28, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Holy crap! Arbitron would be an awesome Transformer!
He'd probably be a SR-71 Blackbird that would tear Optimus Prime in half and eat Megatron for breakfast.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.61.149.93 (talk) 21:34, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Arbitron

message: I could see current along with some other words as being appropriate here.  Currency seems wrong.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.64.235.42 (talk) 20:07, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The currency?
Talk:Exodus (Ultima)

message: From VfD:
I wish we had as many people contributing to our biology articles as we have adding utterly useless video game trivia.  For instance, we still lack an article on the world's largest hornet, Vespa Mandarina Japonica.  (Yes, I've already listed it in requested articles, so there!)  --Ardonik(talk) 02:31, Sep 2, 2004 (UTC)
*Merge into Ultima and redirect. —Stormie 05:26, Sep 2, 2004 (UTC)
*Merge into Ultima and redirect.  Well, gamers spend more time on the Internet.  That and more people need to know about Wikipedia.  Need to let more Professors of Biology know about this site. --Allyunion 10:16, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/NHL season pages format

message: What about that seasons Entry Draft? Earl Andrew 03:17, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: A year since this was last talked about, I added links to the draft years to all the relevant pages. for the 1998 NHL Entry Draft, I added a link to the 1998-99 NHL season. Masterhatch 14:53, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Entry Draft

message: I've been using a Highlights section in the Regular Season area for the seasons prior to the NHL. I recommend it for the NHL. Things like multi-goal games, streaks, etc. Alaney2k 16:54, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Highlights

message: Shouldn't +/- be included in the player stats?  It's always been one of the main stat categories, and is given a higher stature than PIM in NHL.com's stats. V-train 19:54, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: +/-

message: I feel we should amend the Captain and All-Star qualifications to reflect the individual being named to the position as opposed to strictly how many times or how many years they served. Being named Captain or named to an All-Star team isn't a feat achieved by many, and it reflects on the quality of said individual's input towards the team. I feel the way it's currently phrased restricts those who served however briefly from being included. Rusted AutoParts 17:30, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Game amendments - Team Captains and All-Stars 

message: The Debut & Last game lists should require 500 goals or 750 assist for inclusion. GoodDay (talk) 13:33, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: A split in inclusion criteria at the pre/post 1967 season articles, would be best. GoodDay (talk) 17:22, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goals & Assists inclusion criteria 

message: Stanley Cup winner should be in the players' last games in NHL season pages for certain players who earned that position. Maybe all the players who won the Stanley Cup since they haven't NHL season page format for last games, just those who qualified for it. Because if we don't list them, it would be difficult for readers for know without having to click on them to find out. BattleshipMan (talk) 04:41, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stanley Cup winners in Last Games sections of NHL seasons
Talk:Landing helicopter dock

message: As this is an American classification, only American examples should be given. The French do not call the Mistrals LHDs, nor does Spain call Juan Carlos I that. Llammakey (talk) 17:08, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it is a NATO classification also, and is widely used. Granted, those 2 you mentioned have native language classifications also, but most English language sources call them LHDs. The RAN uses Canberra-class landing helicopter dock. - BilCat (talk) 20:54, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for sharing that. That should be reflected in the article somewhere, because it states it as a US classification. I'll look into finding a source. Llammakey (talk) 01:01, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of other nations examples
Talk:Eleanor Roosevelt

message: Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt did NOT get married at "Algonac" in Newburgh, New York, but instead at the double-townhouse home of Eleanor's great aunt and cousin, Margaret Ludlow and Susan Ludlow Parish. This house is located at 6-8 East 76th Street in New York City [Manhattan]. Please correct this. 
Also, the article lists Eleanor's maternal grandmother as Mary Livington Ludlow. But the surname "Hall" should be added to this as well, since "Hall" was her married surname. "Ludlow" is her maiden name. 73.47.78.64 (talk) 04:04, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for spotting that! I found a citation for the place of marriage and have made that and your recommended name change. Very much appreciated! --TeaDrinker (talk) 04:22, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction needed. 

message: The third line of the article says that Roosevelt served as "United States Delegate to the United Nations General Assembly from 1945 to 1952" and gives a link to the page for the "List of ambassadors of the United States to the United Nations." This implies that Roosevelt was the US ambassador from 1945 to 1952 but, according to the second page, the ambassadors during this time were Edward Stettinius Jr., Herschel Johnson, and Warren Austin. Instead, Roosevelt was the "1st United States Representative to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights," as the side bar indicates. I feel like this link/text is misleading, and it should instead say that "Roosevelt served as United States Delegate to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights from 1945 to 1952," as, based on the information I have, this appears more accurate. I may be wrong, however, and I welcome any explanation on the historical context that would explain the wording used here.(talk) 04:07, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Service as "United States Delegate to the United Nations General Assembly" 

message: Married her cousin Franklin Roosevelt 24.137.96.60 (talk) 10:16, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. This is already covered in the article. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:49, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 March 2023 

message: Hello, this is very simple but I just wanted for a small mistake to be fixed. I noticed that on the early life section it says he enrolled rather than she. 2601:404:C67F:FEF0:4081:B7FE:DE25:E42D (talk) 00:18, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This was no mistake; the "he" refers to her brother Hall Roosevelt enrolling as a student at Groton School. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 00:37, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "He enrolled"
Talk:Capitalist

message: Mihnea Tudoreanu reverted my edit, and asked "what was the point of that last edit?"
Here are why I made my edits:
* The article had a lot of boldface text for no apparent purpose, contrary to the appearance of many other Wikipedia articles. I especially don't understand why most of the first sentence was in boldface.
* This article is far too short an article to have a two-item list in it. The list flows better when made into a paragraph.
* I was always taught in my English class that it's better to use "such as" instead of "e.g."
* "... a pejorative, blanket term ...": Here, blanket term is the noun, so don't put a comma before it.
* "... and their supporters in state-sponsored propaganda" is a dangling participle, incorrectly implying that the Soviet Union has supporters in state-sponsored propaganda.
Do you disagree with any of these? - Brian Kendig 04:13, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert

message: Ok socialist redirects to socialism so capitalist should redirect to capitalism
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Halofan101 (talk • contribs) 
: Socialist redirects to socialism because a socialist is someone who supports socialism, which is correct. A capitalist, on the other hand, does not necessarily support capitalism. A redirect to capitalism gives the word "Capitalist" a meaning that is only a recent, secondary and still rare connotation of the word. Therefore, I oppose the redirect. DanielDemaret (talk) 17:49, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Incidentally, this issue has been discussed here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Capitalism#Missing_capitalist_.28as_a_person.29_definition
and lead to the redirect being removed once before. DanielDemaret (talk) 17:56, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bold

message: If you are a capitalist ... please leave this area or site emediatly!!!! I can't believe that you used to know Mao Zedoong... He was a very bad person.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.36.17.20 (talk) 19:17, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  the capitalist want to leave
Talk:Random—Burin—St. George's

message: Hi, this article has a weird character in its title. Is there any reason for not simply using a hyphen? Thanks. Wmahan. 05:09, 2004 Sep 2 (UTC)
:If we changed this, then we would have to change all the rest. The reason this dash exists is to diferentiate it with the way things are spelled in French. example "Sainte-Marie" or "Sainte-Marie—Verdun" There must be a difference. If a dash was used it might infer that Sainte and Marie were two different places, when in reality it is not. This is what Elections Canada does and therefore is official. Earl Andrew 05:56, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Battle of Kulm

message: The Battle of Kulm really was a magnificent example the coalitions ability to rebound after very significant defeats. They did this in the spring after such battles of Lutzen and Bautzen. The defeat against the Allies at Dresden was really quite masterful. To be able to rebound so quickly and defeat one the emporer's better generals is quite remarkable. It is significant to not at this juncture that the coalition realized that it was totally unable to defeat Napoleanan himself piecemeal, but they could make progress against his generals. Kulm is represenitive of the Allies strategic move to bring all their forces against him at once by forcing him to try and be everywhere at once. Jak1985 04:43, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Magnificent example the coalitions ability

message: I have written a stub for a second battle.  The Second Battle of Kulm took place seventeen days after the first one. In the second one the commanders were the Austrian field marshal, Prince of Schwarzenberg and Napoleon. It needs to be expanded, but it appears to be at least as important as this clash (because it involved Napoleon directly).
It might be a good idea to move this article to First Battle of Kulm and put in a dab page here, but if this battle is really more famous than the second one then a hatnote will suffice.
It would also be useful if the links to this article were checked. I have just fixed a link in the article Karl Philipp, Prince of Schwarzenberg so that it links to the second battle, there are bound to be others.
Zanno says - Evidently the Coalition forces suffered no casualties in the battle of Kulm!!! Amazing, really it is.Zanno69 (talk) 07:34, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: First and second battles of Kulm
Talk:Guru Ram Das

message: Someone changed his death date in the text to 69 September 1569. Many other numbers have been changed to 69.2A02:587:3A03:1000:193B:2611:E2FA:738D (talk) 12:59, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Dhan Dhan Ramdas Gur Jin Sireya Tenae Swareya ।।
Waheguru g ka khalsa Waheguru g Ki  fateh , Guru ji always given updesh of one god - Waheguru and recited many famous banis and Shabads - kirtan sohila , Lavan , Rehras sahib . Guru ji followed path demonstrated by 3rd Guru , Guru Amardas ji and then Guru ji nominated Guru Arjun Dev Ji 5th Guru of Sikhs. Jatinder singh othi (talk) 09:53, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guru Ramdas Ji 

message: Xvzvsvsgsdd BFF dfsffsfdv 2403:4800:9444:2C42:C5AF:1D88:4487:C8DA (talk) 00:04, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gjghdfdfdff he sf
Talk:Corgarff Castle

message: This article was included in :Category:Reportedly haunted locations in Scotland. However, as far as I can see the article as it stands makes no reference to any ghost sightings, legends or other paranormal activity associated with Corgarff Castle. For this reason I have taken it out of the category for now. Of course if someone subequently adds material from reliable sources that show there have been claims of hauntings/ghosts/paranormal activities associated with the Castle which should be included in the article for notability reasons, then they are welcome to put it back in the category at this time. Dunarc (talk) 20:35, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of this article from Haunted category due to lack of relevant content
Talk:Research

message: I would argue that indigenous reseach methodologies needs to be added to this article, as a valid alternative to the european and andro-centric scientific method of research. One of the seminal works discussing the principles of indigenous research methods was authored by Cora Weber-Pillwax and published in the Journal of Educational Thought.Weber-Pillwax C., Indigenous Research Methodology, Journal of Educational Thought, Vol. 33, No. 1 (April, 1999) pp.33-45 Looking for some input as to in which section this belongs. Lavender is the new teal (talk) 20:29, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indigenous research methodologies 

message: Background of the study 136.158.64.194 (talk) 06:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Squash 

message: Rrl 112.198.120.68 (talk) 10:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review of related literature about the significant relationship of sex in academic performance of student