lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:California Register of Historical Resources

message: I would like consensus on removing the notability tag on this article. I have expanded the content of it and added sources, links, and an infobox. The article is not about a company or an organization, but about a program to identify, evaluate, register, and protect California's historical resources. Greg Henderson (talk) 05:48, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Gathering at Golden Gate Park in the 60’s 2603:8001:4B00:B2D3:15E8:54BF:23BC:EC2F (talk) 01:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hippies
Talk:St. Xavier's Collegiate School

message: The names are apparently there in the source but are not being displayed due to some template issues YASH 14:36, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Huon (talk) 23:57, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yashovardhan Dhanania (talk • contribs) 03:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  the names of the vice principals are not present
Talk:California School for the Deaf, Fremont

message: I wonder if CSDF Administration would be willing to add more details?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.17.33.162 (talk) 17:45, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History Section Needs To Be Expanded 
Talk:California School for the Deaf, Riverside

message: The current article reads like an advertisement.  Richard Pinch (talk) 20:56, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Volk's Electric Railway

message: Quote from article:
"In general, there is only one train on each single track at any one time. The railway does not operate with two trains on one single track section."
The wording of the two sentences is contradictory.  Either the railway does or does not operate with two trains on one single track section at oner time.  Although this would be regarded as original research, Volk's Railway themselves seem to be unaware of any restriction on operation of two trains on one single track section as they operate in this manner regularly during busy periods particularly during weekends and school holidays. Two trains can often be seen in the Aquarium station or at the Marina station.  The depart one after the other, the second train running twenty to thirty seconds behind the other.  The line speed is clearly low enough that this is not a problem.   Since there is no signalling anywhere on the line, it is clearly operated more as a tramway than a railway.
Also the line voltage is 110 volts not 160 volts as claimed in the article.  Again, this could be considered original research, but there are signs all along the railway warning of the 110 volts centre electrified rail, particularly at the numerous pedestrian crossings.  One has to assume that Volk's Railway themselves know what their voltage is. 86.163.87.193 (talk) 16:24, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Method of Operation 

message: The article claims that the gauge was reduced to its current  gauge.  Since it was originally 2ft, this is hardly a reduction but an increase.  Have I missed a point in the line's history where the gauge was larger than ?  86.163.87.193 (talk) 16:30, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes: it was  for a time.  It's in the article now, but maybe it wasn't when you added the above note.  Why they felt a need to lose half an inch remains a mystery. 109.145.22.224 (talk) 16:43, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gauge 

message: William Pollard, is this the one? Volk's Electric Railway#Rolling Stock Peter Horn User talk 15:40, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, missing link: https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapid=225377508 Peter Horn User talk 15:42, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  William Pollard
Talk:List of beaches in California

message: The title of this article implies to me that it is about beaches maintained by the State of California as part of the California State Park System, but I see that people have added lots of regional and other beaches to the list. I think there should be separate article List of beaches in California listing all named beaches in California. Stepheng3 (talk) 06:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've renamed the article and started a new list for CSBs. - Stepheng3 (talk) 18:32, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  California State Beaches vs. List of beaches in California 

message: Why on Earth is this listed from south to north? -Branddobbe (talk) 04:17, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not? --Stepheng3 (talk) 15:53, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Because north on top, south on bottom has been the inviolable standard in the West for like fifteen hundred years, and putting south at the top just confuses the reader for no reason. -Branddobbe (talk) 03:29, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If this were a map, I would agree with you.  However, it's not a map.  Many things that are not maps are ordered south-to-north, including the U.S. Interstate Highway System. --Stepheng3 (talk) 03:34, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Orientation

message: I would oppose merging the article List of California State Beaches with this List of California beaches, because the California State beach system, like State Parks, has its own specific rules and regulations, which can differ considerably from those on other beaches. Invertzoo (talk) 15:24, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested merge?

message: Since several other current list articles for the West Coast beaches are listed north to south, and since in the vernacular we often say "going up north" and "down south", it seemed reasonable and helpful to readers to organizer this list from north to south rather than vice versa. So I decided to BE BOLD and go ahead and change the order. I also explained in the intro that the list is not fully comprehensive, that it does however contain all the State Beaches, and that right now, two of the counties included also have a more detailed list article of beaches. We could still use some references. I think that the AAA maps for each area are a good reference for beach names? Perhaps this was how the list was originally compiled?  I am in NYC so I don't have all the maps for the whole State of California. Invertzoo (talk) 15:30, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: More on the orientation issue

message: There are a lot of red links in this list, but there are also a lot of beach names that are not linked at all. Is this a consistent choice? Does it mean that all the red-linked beaches should have an article, but the non-linked ones are not notable enough to deserve one? Or was this difference accidental in some cases? Invertzoo (talk) 15:32, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  One remaining question
Talk:Thomas Beddoes

message: The lead of this article mentions an important relationship between Beddoes and Coleridge. There is not a word of this in the article itself. If someone has the cited books, perhaps this could be added in the Career section, noting the years when Beddoes was associated with Coleridge.   --Prairieplant (talk) 12:24, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beddoes and Coleridge
Talk:California State Capitol

message: Just caught this. Griffin5 replaced my photo, which has been in this article for years with no problems, with an inferior photo of his/hers on 5 Apr 2008. That was an incredibly dumb idea.  Griffin5's photo was shot into the sun on a cloudy day, with the result that the clouds end up becoming the subject of the photo rather than the state capitol.  I have brought back my photo in which the sun was to my back and therefore all the features of the Capitol are properly lit.  --Coolcaesar (talk) 04:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please remember to be civil and avoid attacking editors. Comment on the action not the editor. ----moreno oso (talk) 03:12, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: At no point were they attacking an editor. They called into question the reason for the change and the quality of the photo itself. However, thanks for responding with a not so helpful comment over 16 months later. Killiondude (talk) 06:02, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Griffin5's photo replacement on 5 Apr 2008 was asinine

message: I see no mention of the beautiful gardens, park, and statues to the back of the Capitol Building.  Are they not a part of the Capitol ??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Myassisdragon (talk • contribs) 08:24, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: sounds like a wonderful paragraph for you to contribute to the article. --emerson7 15:59, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitol Building Grounds

message: So Michael Bowers apparently attacked the building because he didn't like Gray Davis. The article linked is really fucking vague about it. Whats the story? There HAS to be a story here, and it ought to be in the article. --71.32.220.235 (talk) 06:36, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 2001 truck attack

message: This article misspells the word "capital", seat of government, and misuses the word "capitol", a building in Washington or doric column.  Look it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.211.21.71 (talk • contribs) 
: Feel free to make changes. Be bold! Killiondude (talk) 00:01, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: I CANNOT FIND THE ANSWER!!!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.248.213 (talk) 23:18, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the purpouse of the California Sate Capitol Building? 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Sacramento,-California---State-Capitol.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for June 9, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-06-09. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:19, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Sacramento,-California---State-Capitol.jpg scheduled for POTD
Talk:Coldean

message: In relation to the discovery of Bronze Age artefacts during Brighton and Hove Bypass construction work...
*https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10026167/1/SAC%20Vol%20154-Garland&Anderson-Whymark.pdf
*http://www.brightonarch.org.uk/notebook/Coldean%20Lane%20-%20Bronze%20Age.pdf
*https://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archiveDS/archiveDownload?t=arch-446-1/dissemination/pdf/b_bypass_sec_7_excav_coldean_lane.pdf
*https://www.academia.edu/1930259/Ceramics_and_settlement_in_Bronze_Age_Brighton
*https://new.brighton-hove.gov.uk/sites/default/files/migrated/article/inline/Further%20Assessment%20of%20Urban%20Fringe%202015%20Archaeology.pdf
Also more stuff about demographics in ref [1] (Urban Characterisation Study).  Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 22:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further expansion
Talk:Rajdhani College, Bhubneswar

message: Note:  Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 07:16, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Orissa Addition
Talk:California State Controller

message: I deleted the sentence stating in 2006 that Steve Westley didn't run for a second term and ran for governor instead and the sentence about Chiang defeating Tony Strickland.  It would seem more appropriate for this information to go into an article about the election itself or in the articles about the said individuals and seems out of place out of place for the article about the office itself.  GreatGreg 16:34, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Steve Wesley Governor bid/2006 election

message: It would be great to add the history of the Controller's Office. When was it established? Why? When were duties and responsibilities added?Pcvjamaica (talk) 16:43, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Controller's Office History
Talk:Rajdhani College, Bhubaneswar

message: Note:  Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 07:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Orissa Addition
Talk:California State Indian Museum

message: Hi! I learned something about geolink tags and am using it in some of WP:CAL articles that were in stub statuses. I have a question about the Wikimapia. Is a screenshot of a Wikimapia map and/or satellite image considered releaseable to the Wiki projects under the GNU Free Documentation License? If so, this would really help our project in terms of being able to put quality maps of noted interchanges, desert locales, etc. I will post this on the California State Indian Museum talkpage. If you could answer me there, I'd appreciate it!!! Cheers, Ronbo76 15:29, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I know, WikiMapia hasn't determined how to license their content yet. Wikimedia's WikiMaps project (here) is working on creating free-use geographic images. Until then, I believe we just have to link to the sites with better information than we have. Kafziel Talk 15:36, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geolink tag, Wikimapia, [[California State Indian Museum]] and [[GNU Free Documentation License]] question
Talk:Harcourt Butler Technical University

message: The quality of article is certainly below expected moderators (subjective statements, unverified opinion/material etc.) requested to put suitable reeminder on the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.162.224.5 (talk) 17:36, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: List of Alumni has no place here. The article needs a bit of a rewrite. ChiragPatnaik (talk) 16:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of alumni? 

message: We will explore what changes has been made in last century. A1b2h3i449 (talk) 20:05, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  100 years of HBTU
Talk:California State Police

message: "California State Police, not CHP, Steve, buy me a jamba juice."
where is the relevance?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.41.202.90 (talk) 07:45, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance 
Talk:Vikas Vidyalaya

message: We need to know more. Pics. More topics and refs. We need some Indian Schools who can create a good article ... is this the one? Victuallers 20:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:58, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 
Talk:Leona Lewis

message: :Wikipedia:WikiProject Songs has an RFC for the use of radio station/networks' playlists being cited in articles. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Heartfox (talk) 00:12, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Wikipedia:WikiProject Songs]] has an [[WP:RFC|RFC]]
Talk:Soft-skinned vehicle

message: It is remarkable that this article even exists, being a no-refs stub (four sentences).  It is truly amazing that it took over two dozen edits over a course of more than a decade to get it to this point.  Couldn't this effort be put to better use? --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 15:54, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hunh? 

message: : This article has existed since 2003 as an unsourced dictionary entry. I added a source (from a WP:BEFORE search) but it is actually more of a dictionary entry source. The rest of the article seems to involve original research.
:I can see why this would bring "Hunh?" comments from .  ==  Otr500 (talk) 15:12, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Should this "Article" not simply be nominated for speedy deletion, as considered synonymous with unarmored military vehicles ? --GeeTeeBee (talk) 16:16, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article issues
Talk:Soaring Eagle Casino

message: This page has tournament dates.
http://www.soaringeaglecasino.com/poker.htm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.217.52.143 (talk) 23:42, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tournaments have increased to weekly. 

message: It seems that this article should be flagged for not citing any sources. 
Also, I'd imagine it should probably be officially categorized as a stub.
I'm not an experienced user, I just wanted to mention it. TheDork (talk) 15:50, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag this article?
Talk:Sturmgeschütz

message: I added some more content from two seemingly authoritative sites and included references. I worked to try to incorporate what was already present into the new headings but it doesn't flow very well still. More work needs to be done to cite sources and make this more encyclopedic. bderrly (talk) 01:16, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional content 

message: Should this pervasive internet meme be mentioned in the article? Stub Mandrel (talk) 15:57, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: It's A STUG Life

message: The name of the gun that the StuG tanks used contains the letters "StuK". What does this mean? StuG means "Sturmgeschütz" (Assault gun). And in other names the letter "K" often means "Kanone" (cannon). However if StuK means "Sturmkanone" (Assault gun), what is the diference between StuG and StuK?--User71131159 (talk) 00:03, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  StuK
Talk:Sd.Kfz. 6

message: Hello wikipedians! This vehicle was found recently in Poland, think you might be interested: http://technowinki.onet.pl/inne/multimedia/unikatowy-pojazd-sdkfz-6-z-czasow-ii-wojny-swiatow,5213332,0,foto-male.html Wielkizielonymelon (talk) 07:30, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  SdKfz 6 found in Poland 

message: Hi Wikipedians, I'm after verifiable sources to expand the article to a B-class if possible. Also I'm after good quality "free" pics of the variants 6/2 & 6/3, to include in the article. Can anyone please help? Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 13:21, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Id hellp. If i wasnt busy eating doritos. Some Random Dingus (talk) 17:47, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for expansion? Images of variants? 

message: If you look at the variants section, you'll see that the variant has only 1 sentence of coverage, where has my article has a few more, so i am against merging this. Some Random Dingus (talk) 18:04, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The variant is not relevant enough to be eligible for its own article, all info belongs to this main article. But that need better sources than tanks encyclopedia. Your main part, development of the F-22, is entirely irrelevant, a simple link to the gun article is sufficient. Lots of factual errors in your texts. --Denniss (talk) 19:15, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The same applies to the 6/2 article. --Denniss (talk) 19:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Lemme find a few 100-200 sources then. Happy? Some Random Dingus (talk) 03:42, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

text: Update: i quit dis shit. Some Random Dingus (talk) 06:17, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Merge - better to have it all together. GraemeLeggett (talk) 11:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: i h o n e s t l y d i d n t f u c k i n g a s k. Some Random Dingus (talk) 08:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Just noting that there doesn't seem to be a 6/3 article (or not one I can find). Klbrain (talk) 11:45, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Addendum: missed that it had been moved to a draft: Draft:Sd kfz 6/3 Klbrain (talk) 11:48, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Merging With The Article Sd,kfz 6/3 and 6/2.
Talk:Helensburgh Upper railway station

message: See also Talk: West Highland Line.
Article has been reverted to include the Closed Craigendoran Station. Consideration is to be provided for the closed station between Helensburgh Upper and Arrochar.
One way would be to include a Disused Line box as has been added for the Glasgow Central Railway closed stations - for example Glasgow Green railway station. Then closed station could be listed with strike-out on the West Highland Line page and the closed stations at Faslane, Rhu (Row) etc, could be covered.
Stewart 18:57, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closed Stations on West Highland Line 

message: More out of curiosity than anything else, can anyone explain the massive leap in passenger numbers reported in the article? WhaleyTim (talk) 19:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's down to the way that ticket sales are allocated to stations within a station group. See the discussion at Talk:Tyndrum Lower railway station, another station where the same thing occurred. –Signalhead < T > 19:42, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks WhaleyTim (talk) 19:58, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Passenger Numbers
Talk:Adrian Hardy Haworth

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Haw. and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 30#Haw. until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  BD2412 T 01:44, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Haw." listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:EFA (mobile bridge)

message: Description page on the site of the French Ministry of Defence link leads to a not found page  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:569:7913:CB00:8492:F045:51B6:55D0 (talk) 03:07, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Link
Talk:Philipp Christoph Zeller

message: The article has improved little since I first saw it in 2006. You may wish to consult one or more of the major biographical sources about Zeller: 
* Stainton, H. T. 1883. Philipp Christoph Zeller. - Entomologist's monthly magazine 20: 1-8. 
* Frey, H. 1883. Professor P. C. Zeller. Ein Necrolog. - Entomologische Zeitung [Stettin] 44: 413-416. 
* Dunning, J. W. 1883. in: Proc. ent. soc. London 1883: 44-46.
* Dohrn, C. A. 1883. Nachwort [to Zeller’s obituary by Frey]. - Entomologische Zeitung [Stettin] 44: 416-418. 
* Dohrn, C. A. 1883. Ergänzung zu dem Verzeichnisse der Werke Zeller's S. 407. - Entomologische Zeitung [Stettin] 44: 418. 
* Sattler, K. 1962. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Mikrolepidopterologie. – Entomologische Zeitschrift 72: 138-140. 
* Dietl, H. 1982. Professor Philipp Christoph Zeller. – Steinheimer Nachrichten, Beiträge zur Heimatkunde 24 (31): [4 pp.].
Zeller’s entomological collecting trips to southern Europe and to the Alps should be mentioned – they’re not many, so can be dealt with briefly. 
In respect to the situation of female scientists in the 19th century it would be worthwhile, I think, to mention Zeller’s role in helping Friederike Lienig (1790-1855) to get her entomological papers published – with Zeller as co-author. [see her obituary in Allgemeine deutsche naturhistorische Zeitung 1856: 71-76] --IP 89.51.66.67 (talk) 13:09, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Mobility kill

message: This article (at least the snippet I can see) appears interesting:
Perverse Paradoxes in the Applications of the Paradoxical Logic of Strategy
G Prins - Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 1988
... A mobility kill in WTO tracked armoured forces is as strategically efficient as
total destruction, cheaper and easier to inflict and less easy to resist. ...
Unfortunately, I don't have access to the full text. – 74  03:37, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevant journal article