Talk:Situs inversus

message: The e-medicine article suggest 0.01% (1 in 10,000) of population is afflicted with Situs inversus, we appear to use this statistic. http://healthlink.mcw.edu/article/901226430.html suggests 1 in 7000 to 8000 is afflicted. Which shall we use? --OldakQuill 19:57, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  prevalence 

message: The developmental biology of Situs inversus must be governed by the action potential which orders the formation of the tissues of the inverted organs. Ancheta Wis 03:10, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: What is actually missing is an attempt to explain this down to the molecular reasons for this. After all, everyone starts as a single cell, so the development for a situs inversus must have something remarkable, and I am sure this was described in detail already. Now only wikipedia needs to get this info... ;) 80.108.103.172 (talk) 02:03, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  background 

message: I do not at all understand the meaning of this:
Individuals with situs inversus that require transplantation of solid organs (e.g., the liver) may have issues regarding managing the altered anatomy they present with.
"Regarding managing" and "present with" aren't even proper English, I think, but I don't understand this well enough to clarify it. Also, I think it'd be nice to know something more about these issues.
Nickptar 00:29, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  this is just a 'left' shoe on 'right' foot problem - could be said clearer tho. e 02:05, 11 May 2004 (UTC)

text: The syntax "presents with" is normal doctor-speak.  As for the rest, Erich gasboy|e is right.  Blood vessels and nerves don't quite match up.  Teflon Don 03:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: anatomy

message: It's like me putting my name under cystinuria. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 139.225.163.202 (talk) 23:31, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone please delete the UNM student from historical people? 

message: Since our only child was born with situs inversus totalis does this mean that when we decide to have another one that he/she will have it to?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.128.10.153 (talk) 04:07, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If neither of you have it then your odds of having another child with it are 1 in 4 but 3/4 of your kids will be carriers.  If one of you has it you have a 50-50 chance for any other children and all your kids will be carriers.  If both of you have it all of your children will also.  This is what is meant by autozomal recessive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.66.14.94 (talk) 19:39, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chances of inheritance 

message: From descriptions in the Enrique Iglesias article, it seems that statements by Mr. Iglesias regarding his anatomy should not be taken seriously. Absent other evidence, I don't think he should be included in the list of notable people with this condition. Perhaps he could be included as a fictional character?  Cstaffa (talk) 22:04, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:BLP, since there was no source, I removed the mention of him from this article, along with two other unsourced names. Situs inversus is (no longer?) mentioned in the Enrique Iglesias article, but it does mention that "Iglesias is very well known for not taking the media seriously and has consistently joked about a wide variety of matters", so it seems unlikely that he should be listed here. Siawase (talk) 11:57, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enrique Iglesias 

message: Apart from potential complications with diagnosis or organ transplation, does situs inversus cause any medical problems, or does the reversed anatomy function normally?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.111.174.183 (talk) 15:42, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Providing the situs inversus is complete then everything functions normally. People with situs inversus live just as long as people without this condition. HairyWombat (talk) 01:38, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harmful? 

message: Just thought id mention that The Platner Story by H.G. wells was also about a man with Situs Inversus  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.25.192.4 (talk) 00:26, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Plattner Story 

message: In the recent film, "Ninja Assassin," staring Korean film singer Rain and the great Sho Kosugi, situs plays a prevalent role in the plot.  (SPOILER WARNING!!!)  An early reveal features an old man that once survived a ninja attack serendipitously due to the condition.  This is a set-up to justify the eventual survival of another key character (female) due to the same condition.  This would make a valid addition to the "in fiction" section.  67.161.39.188 (talk) 08:58, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ninja Assassin 

message: This report  in telegraph.co.uk says a '64-year-old could be the only man in the world whose internal organs are in the mirror opposite position of where they should be' and this 'is thought to be the only living case of "situs inversus".' But going by the article this is not so rare. Did telegraph.co.uk get the name wrong or is there a even more rarer sub-category of the condition ? --Mgtm7m (talk) 15:34, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not just a case of situs inversus; the newspaper reporter got it wrong. The patient has no small intestine, two livers, plus other abnormalities. HairyWombat (talk) 18:05, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the clarification -Mgtm7m (talk) 09:37, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only living case ? 

message: Hello I'm Deborah varca are in Turin and I have 20 years I have discovered  the statum viscerum inversum the age of 13 years does not mean anything preocupante true?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.244.88.80 (talk) 15:08, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Google translates "preocupante" as "some worrying". If your situs inversus viscerum is complete then no, there is no need to worry. People with situs inversus live just as long as people without this condition. If you ever need major surgery then make sure they know, and if you ever need an organ transplant then there can be problems as the new organ may not "fit". HairyWombat (talk) 01:11, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preocupante? 

message: The length of the fictional examples of characters with this condition is nearly as long as the rest of the content of the article.  That seems excessive.  What's the guideline on stuff like this?  You sure as heck don't make a list of everyone in fiction with, say, blue eyes. 76.98.145.131 (talk) 19:36, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Overabundance of Fictional Examples

message: Since the editor seems pretty adamant about inserting the image, I wanted to see if perhaps it was just me.  Is this accurate?  Before removing the image for a third time, I wanted to try to discuss this, and if I'm wrong, awesome, I'll stop removing the image, but from my understanding, this description is inaccurate.  I didn't see any sources supporting the description that situs inversus is "due to" KS, and to my understanding, KS is defined by the presence of situs inversus, situs inversus is never "caused by" KS. - SudoGhost 15:04, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not just you. KS is a syndrome which includes SI; it's not a cause of SI. In any case, I doubt that the image should be used, as the text error has been embedded within the image itself, and the latter is identified as "own work" (student? patient?). It seems preferable, imho, to illustrate the article using images and descriptors from reliable medical sources. Haploidavey (talk) 15:17, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The user has returned from being blocked to continue to reinsert the image without discussion, so I thought I'd comment on this.  The user is apparently inserting a new version of the image without the "KS causes SI" wording, but I agree that an image that is one's "own work" doesn't really belong on the article when there are images from reliable medical sources available, and certainly not without any sort of discussion first. - SudoGhost 02:43, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's good to see a positive response to concerns over text but I can't see that such a complex assembly of tiny images helps the average reader to grasp the topic. It seems to illustrate a KS case study; SI plus pathological signs (COPD (bronchiectasis?), KS-related heart-trace abnormalities}, and a part-labelled cross-sectional CT showing typical SI reversals - we already have one of those on the page. As the image seems tied to KS, rather than SI, it might be useable at the KS article. Btw, a bot has asked the user to clarify the image's source and status. So far, there's been no response to that or any other requests and messages at the user's talk-page. Haploidavey (talk) 12:33, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image regarding situs inversus and KS 

message: An image used in this article, File:Kartagener syndrome.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Kartagener syndrome.png)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:53, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Kartagener syndrome.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Situs inversus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090107130409/http://wcco.com/sports/Minnesota.Timberwolves.Randy.2.371610.html to http://wcco.com/sports/Minnesota.Timberwolves.Randy.2.371610.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:30, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Not all his organs are reversed, only the abdominal organs. --Dr. Hartwig Raeder (talk) 14:40, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Randy Foye 

message: According to the source https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/condition/heterotaxy-syndrome situs solitus is normal organ distribution, situs inversus – mirror image. Situs ambiguous is everything in between. So Rose Marie Bentley was not situs inversus
1.	She was not mirror image.
2.	She had some isomerism characteristics, typical for heterotaxy, for example, her right and left lungs both had only two lobes.
3.	She had abnormal vessel anatomy and not so typical right atrium.
The fact that CNN named her situs inversus does not make her one.
Kublakuzz (talk) 13:07, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: We rely on published, reliable sources here.  Multiple of these sources, as well as the staff of Oregon Health and Sciences University who examined her cadaver, have described Bentley's condition as "Situs inversus with levocardia".  Unless you can find a reliable published source that describes her condition as something other than that, the inclusion of Bentley among notable cases of situs inversus will stay. General Ization Talk   13:13, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Situs inversus is not situs ambiguus, situs ambiguus is not situs inversus 

message: It sounds like really bad slang, a comedian impersonating the Latin language or something along those lines.
If it is indeed correct. this post can be ignored.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.105.212.140 (talk) 18:14, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "situs inversus incompletus" - did they give up and made-up "incompletus" ? 

message: List The Organs Invosrred In Digastive Systam  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.190.2.218 (talk) 20:04, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basic Sc