Talk:Tom and Jerry (drink)

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 10:19, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: I find the claim that it is limited to "the Upper Midwest" is dubious.  I'm in Seattle and we know the drink very well.  I could not tell you how many other people in Seattle know it, but our family has been drinking it for 3 generations, it is a Christmas tradition.  My grandfather came from England, I suspect that he learned the recipe over there.  Many years later he became a bartender, so there was at least one bartender in Seattle who could fix you a T&J.  How widespread it is in Seattle I could not tell you, but I bet it's pretty common over in England.  If you think about the promotion of the book, it makes sense that England heard about it too.
:Yeah, the 'limited' label is misleading, as I have seen them sold at many Ski Resorts throughout New England, as well as in Northern New York, Pennsylvania and Ohio.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.79.246.70 (talk) 00:15, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The source cited in re: "A Tom and Jerry is served primarily in Wisconsin and Minnesota, and is difficult to find outside of the Upper Midwest or Northern Rocky Mountain region" is sketchy at best as it uses Wikipedia as one of its sources. 74.79.246.70 (talk) 04:14, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously discussing changes to the article here has no impact on certain editors when it comes to making changes to the article that suit them, simply because they choose to make the changes. Can folks simply change the meaning of sources? 74.79.246.70 (talk) 11:53, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

text: Here is a source that says it's obscure outside Wisconsin: A Regional Oddball, Resurrected for Chilliest of Days Kendall-K1 (talk) 16:03, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  dubious locality 

message: I don't quite get this article/recipe...  an "eggnog with brandy"  is just that... it's an eggnog.   The thing that makes a T&J different from an eggnog is the folded eggs with sugar.  if that were not the case you would never be able to claim that it is only available in the Midwest, because there is hardly a town in America where you can not buy pre-made eggnog by the half-gallon, at Christmas time.  and plenty of people like to spike their eggnog with a little something extra. you can hardly call that unique.  a spiked eggnog is NOT a T&J.  If Egan introduced T&J as being a spiked eggnog then it needs to have a specific cited reference. otherwise the claim is bogus.  
I read some of the references and found nothing to contradict my assertion that eggnog and tom and jerry are distinctly different drinks and should not be confused with each other as this article currently does.  although the ingredients are similar, it's all in how you prepare them.  For instance scrambled eggs and an omelet are not at all the same thing even though they can be made with the identical ingredients.  same thing goes for T&J vs Eggnog.  the eggnog is blended to a uniform consistency, but the T&J the egg whites are beaten separately from the yolks and then folded together.  Both texture and taste of T&J are different from eggnog.  How could they sell a T&J batter mix if it were identical to eggnog except for the brandy.  reading the references, historically eggnog was mixed with a wide variety of alcohol even including wine... basically anything that was available.  The key difference is that for T&J the yolks are separated from the egg-whites, in eggnog the whole egg is used.
:I agree that the article isn't making the distinction very clear.  However I don't think that the key difference you've named is a difference at all -- at least not categorically.  Eggnog is also frequently made with the yolks beaten (with sugar) as a separate step from beating the whites, and then they are folded together, just as you describe for a T&J.  I'm talking about non-commercial egg nog of course, and commercial eggnog is clearly made some other way, but a Google search confirms that eggnog recipes do often follow this pattern, and my suspicion is that in the past, all egg og was made this way.  It seems to me that while this is a requirement for T&J, it is no longer a requirement for eggnog; but eggnog which does it is just good eggnog, not misidentified T&J.  If I had to name something I think is different about the drinks, I would have said: a T&J is boozier and served hot while an eggnog is not quite as strong and is usually served cold (once again though, I don't think we could call this a categorical difference).   24.60.170.127 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 18:39, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  eggnog vs Tom and Jerry 

message: I would agree that the addition of brandy to rum wouldn't be enough to define a drink as a Tom and Jerry.  Eggnogs often sport various liquors.  Further, I don't think I would want to argue that the preparation of the eggs is really the defining feature.  I have seen many eggnogs where the eggs are separated and the whites, whipped to stiff peaks, and then folded in with the other ingredients.  Check the recipes at drinksmixer.com, for example.  Many recipes for eggnog use that same preparation. It seems to me much more likely that the heat of the drink is most significant.  I've never seen an eggnog served warm but Tom and Jerry seems to always be.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RichardBeckwith (talk • contribs) 23:14, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  eggnog vs Tom and Jerry 2 

message: Tom and Jerry is not a cocktail.  It's a punch, as is eggnog.  It may have alcohol added and be served in a glass, although a small mug is more common in my experience, but that doesn't make it a cocktail.  By the definition here on Wikipedia, a cocktail contains an alcohol and one  other ingredient.  Since both egg nog and Tom and Jerry do not require the inclusion of an alcohol, they can't be cocktails.  Also, since they're typically/often served in punch bowls, well...  Zlama (talk) 08:48, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The article was moved in August 2014 with no discussion and the comment "moved page Tom and Jerry (mixed drink) to Tom and Jerry (cocktail): More standard disambiguator". I'm going to move it back because, as you say, it's not a cocktail. Kendall-K1 (talk) 15:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  not a cocktail 

message: It seems unlikely that ½ ounce is correct. That is what the source says, but a half ounce is not capable of "fortifying it [eggnog] considerably." You would barely notice that. Kendall-K1 (talk) 15:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, we don't know what kind of ounce it was, since the Imperial ounce had not yet come in to use. I put in a conversion from US fluid ounces, which should be close to whatever ounce was in use at the time. Kendall-K1 (talk) 02:12, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Half ounce of brandy 

message: The recipe we have is unsourced. I did change it to say both brandy and rum, as that's standard I believe. I have two sources here, DeGroff and Imbibe. DeGroff calls for eggs, sugar, cinnamon, cloves, allspice, rum, brandy, water, nutmeg. Imbibe calls for eggs, sugar, clove, nutmeg, allspice, brandy, rum, milk, water. The only major difference seems to be the milk. Kendall-K1 (talk) 01:28, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Embury calls for rum and bourbon. Kendall-K1 (talk) 23:45, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recipe 

message: I don't see the discussion where we arrived at consensus to move this page to "Tom and Jerry (drink)". Where is that, and what's the reason? Kendall-K1 (talk) 00:46, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drink 

message: Five years ago an editor added, I think rightly, the tag  "dubious - discuss" to the statement that "To publicize the book and the play, Egan introduced a variation of eggnog by adding 1⁄2 US fluid ounce (15 ml) of brandy, calling it a "Tom and Jerry". Nobody has come forward to "discuss" till now. I have been reading three biographical studies of Egan in the course of writing an article on his book, and there is no mention of his inventing such a drink, or indeed needing any publicity for an unprecedented, runaway best-seller. Nor is it even faintly likely that he would want to publicise the play, as it was an unauthorised rip-off of his novel. The source cited, "The Kitchen Project", does not cite any authority for the statement, and so far as historical research goes cannot, I think, be regarded as a WP:RS. I think we should remove the statement, rather than just leaving it there with the "dubious" tag. Tim riley talk 12:04, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin 

message: The Tom & Jerry has been a holiday tradition at Miller's Pub in Chicago since 1935. The Miller's Pub version was featured in Esquire and Playboy. PlaysInPeoria (talk) 17:27, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miller's Pub