Template talk:Infobox Missile

message: Wouldn't it make sense to include the missle's payload capacity in this infobox? --Pifactorial 06:46, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: that would be the meaning of the entry warhead would it not, its the way it has been filled in for both this and  templates. GraemeLeggett 08:42, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Okay, I was thinking specifically of the Taepodong-2 article, where "Warhead" is listed only as "Conventional & non-conventional; Satellite", with no further information.  The article mentions that the capacity is "less than 500 kg" at maximum range, and "700–1000 kg" at short range.  How would this data be properly incorperated into the userbox? --Pifactorial 17:21, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  how you just wrote it.GraemeLeggett 19:35, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capacity 

message: In Safari, all of the content of this template, including the green bars, projects outside of it on the right side, beyond the bounds of the browser window.  The windows does not get a horizontal scrollbar though, so about 1/4 of the content is completely impossible to read.
Oddly, the empty infobox on the template page looks fine. —Michael Z. 2006-09-10 14:48 Z
: I believe I have fixed this, but I don't understand all of the code in the template.  It looks fine now in the dozen articles I have checked.  The previous template code looked way too complicated, with a mix of wikitable and HTML table tags, and for some reason three columns used for a two-column table.—Michael Z. 2006-09-10 15:46 Z
Actually, this template is no longer officially sanctioned.  Within the next year or two, we will be converting missile articles to use  and .  See WP:LV.  Ingoolemo talk 17:30, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What's the status of that effort?  I was about to use  to improve the Standard Missile article.  If  is the successor, better lay claim to it quickly.  (See next section).  Wdfarmer (talk) 15:53, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout is broken and unreadable 

message: See ; it's been listed for speedy deletion as of February 12 2008 because "it is a deprecated or orphaned template that no longer serves a useful purpose".  Is this true? Wdfarmer (talk) 15:53, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion: missile specifications template

message: Please discuss at Template talk:Infobox rocket. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 13:30, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger 

message: There should be a separate field for the image caption.  On RBS-15, I'd like to point out that its the missile on the right, for example.--Adamrush 21:51, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! --Rlandmann (talk) 19:28, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image caption 

message: I've added a  parameter that can be used to pass in ... tags that apply to the "General characteristics" section as a whole.  Applying those tags to the  parameter didn't work very well because the black reference tags didn't show up well against the green header background. Wdfarmer (talk) 23:03, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References parameter

message: I've extended the existing Stage1, Stage2, Stage3 parameters by adding a new Stage4 parameter.  It was needed for RIM-161 Standard Missile 3. Wdfarmer (talk) 23:39, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Stage4 parameter