lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ruthenium(III) chloride

message: I apologize to whomever drew the otherwise nice rendering of RuCl3, but IMHO it is a disservice to WE readers to legitimize the idea that 3-coordination has much to do with what we know of "ruthenum trichloride."  Apologies if my step seems heavy handed or arrogant, it's not intended that way.--Smokefoot 22:07, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

message: i HAVE TRIED TO DISSOLVE 99.98% Ruthenium in CEM digestion unit using HCL, HNO3 AND HF AT 260 degrees celsius. It took 2hours to have 95% dissolution, is there something that I am doing to inhibit the complete dissolution? Please help!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.26.10.2 (talk) 07:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not really a help-line.  However hydrated ruthenium trichloride dissolves nicely in water or alcohols as described repeatedly in Inorganic Syntheses, see [] If you are looking for highly reproducible results, you might look for derivatives of this compound, such as salts of chlorocarbonyls.--Smokefoot (talk) 14:12, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dissolution of 99.98% Ruthenium using CEM microwave DIGESTION UNIT
Talk:Thulium(III) oxide

message: It says that it was first isolated in 1878, yet in the thulium article, it says 1879. Can we fix one or the other?
(See similar note on the thulium page.)
WesT (talk) 20:00, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: See Talk:Thulium. Double sharp (talk) 03:21, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Check dates
Talk:Celestine (mineral)

message: If "celestine" is the accepted name, shouldn't this page be moved to an article with that title, and have "celestite" redirect to "celestine"? - An anonymous user
The caption of the picture reads celestine: is this a typing error, or an accepted alternative spelling? Physchim62 12:02, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Er... second sentence ... :-) Vsmith 12:58, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: See: On the celestite-secreting Acantharia and their effect on seawater strontium to calcium ratios 131.111.30.21 (talk) 10:37, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biological use 

message: As I know as well as on mindat.org, the cleavage is "Perfect On {001} perfect; on {210} good; on {010} poor. Also reported on {011}"
Why here it is said "Perfect on one crystal face parallel to long axis (001), and nearly perfect on a second face (110)" ? Nghia1991ad (talk) 09:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed per Handbook of Mineralogy. Just do it :) Vsmith (talk) 15:23, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleavage ??? 
Talk:Allegheny Airlines

message: Perhaps I'm confused, but I thought Allegheny Airlines was the predecessor to USAir/USAirways itself?  Can anyone shed light on this?
Cliffb 12:36, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I photographed an Airbus A310 sporting the Allegheny Airlines tail insignia on 07/12/2008.
The last 5 letters of the name "Allegheny" is also visible on the tail.
Does anyone know why a modern aircraft would be sporting the insignia of a defunct airline?
Todd, Northern NJ, USA  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.196.158.108 (talk) 03:23, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's part of US Airway's Heritage Aircraft liveries.  Several A319s were painted in the colors of PSA, Allegheny, Piedmont, and America West schemes (basically all the carriers that have been merged into the US name).  -Dan in PHX  12.47.205.126 (talk) 04:40, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Allegheny Airlines in 2008?

message: I recall that upon arrival at JFK, from AMS, my connecting flight to Bradley Int'l Airport Hartfort CT was operated by Allegheny. The Fokker F27 Friendship performed very well in thunderstorm and continuous lightning. 
The cockpit door was open during the entire flight and I could see the pilot was stuggling the extremely bad weather conditions. After a bumpy landing at Bradley the pilot explained this was just fun, his realy challenging flights were in Nam...
Over here I read that the Allegheny era stopped in 1979....? 2A02:A46A:22D7:1:9DCD:7066:13DA:FA49 (talk) 18:28, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allegheny flight in late 1981
Talk:Eleni Daniilidou

message: 5th dec or 12th May ???? Rich Farmbrough 12:41, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: (05/12/2003)

message: This photo is quite old.  I think we can get a new one to replace the old one.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.98.209 (talk) 22:39, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:Mount Maunganui (mountain)

message: Moved from Mauao - Mrcurly 12:42, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading
Talk:Hey Bulldog

message: who played lead in the song bull dog by the beatles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by  4.247.251.249 (talk)  12:58, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Lead what? Vocal? That's John. Anything else, and I've no idea. - 211.28.82.49 03:58, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

text: As far as I know, John played the lead guitar solo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyclopseslayer (talk • contribs) 07:27, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

text: John was the lead vocal although George was the guitar soloist.  John played the piano riff. -wtk  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.250.112.144 (talk)  01:04, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

text: According to Geoff Emerik, lead guitar solo was played by George. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.127.234.7 (talk)  15:33, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead

message: please confirm it, or give george lead credit, because i read a lot that he played lead and the solo and not john, so please someone search for a source.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.173.175.125 (talk) 12:47, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personnel section 

message: According to Yellow Submarine animating director Jack Stokes, in his audio commentary for the Warner Brother's DVD of the film, the audio and animation sequence of Hey Bulldog was added near the end of movie very late in its production at the behest of the Beatles. Stokes adds that this was highly unusual because the Beatles had very little input with the production details of the movie until then. Optimister (talk) 15:01, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion in Yellow Submarine the movie 

message: Lennon does not play solo on the recording or in the video. Moreover, he plays something completely different there, neither related to the solo nor to anything else in this song.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RoisinMorgan (talk • contribs) 23:56, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Ararat (film)

message: The Grey Wolves are terrorist? Oh, come on, we are talking about a legal party and it´s legal members....
Pamir 13:22, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's possible for a legal party to also double as a terrorist group.  After all, Hamas is a legal party in the Palestinian authority and its a terrorist organization... -- Clevelander 11:58, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Like Dashnak PartyAbbatai (talk) 18:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Terrorist?

message: I think that the article should have something about the music, such as the song P.L.U.C.K., by System of a Down.  Just a thought.Defy You 02:47, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[P.L.U.C.K.]]

message: It's not enough to say that some people felt negatively about the movie for such and such a reason. The section needs references to actual people or sources of criticism. -- Augustgrahl 04:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also agree with what Augustgrahl said becuase it says the film was criticised without giving any reference to who criticised or why did they criticise the film. If it doesn't have a reference than that paragraph should be deleted. ROOB323 08:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Weasel Words
Talk:Sundsvall

message: Not too sure but the official Sundsvall homepage states that the city has around 93000 inhabitants (which is the same number that several locals told me). Quite a difference to the 43000 that are mentioned here...
: Yes it is problematic to differ between the municipality and urban area (town), or whether to combine them. 130.235.137.163 08:20, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

message: Which syllable is stressed? David Arthur (talk) 18:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The latter. Both vowels are short. To my understanding, the standard Swedish prounanciation of the letter U is  (long close central rounded vowel, as in "you" or "sue") or  (short close-mid central rounded vowel). However, in the local Sundsvall dialect, a short U is typically pronounced as the phonetic sound  (mid central vowel), i.e. same pronounciation as the Swedish letter "Ö", or as in "heard" or "girl" but short. So I beleive the standard Swedish IPA pronounciation should be written , while the local pronounciation is  (as if it was spelled "Söndsvall").  Mange01 (talk) 15:27, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks — I suspected as much, but not having heard it said, didn't want to make any assumptions. David Arthur (talk) 14:57, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 
Talk:Cleanroom suit

message: We may need more than one image to really show the different forms that serve this function.
I have added one basic image showing a typical suit in use. I will leave the image request tag on until those interested parties are satisfied. -Dr Haggis - Talk 02:20, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it was Intel marketing. The  BunnyPeople™ character from Pentium 2 Ads . `a5b (talk) 00:30, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

message: Please, delete "bunny suit" from the first line of the articel. It is the marketing term from Intel:  `a5b (talk) 00:30, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is colloquial term for the suit, so you do want it to be found by a websearch.  Would be interesting to link to the origin of the term as a marketing term though. DeminJanu (talk) 20:38, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Intel.com describes the introduction of "bunny people" to their public brand in 1997 and the years following. A google search for "before:1997 bunny suit clean room" turns up sources from the late 1980's to the mid 1990's using the term "bunny suit" to refer to the coveralls worn in controlled contamination environments. AnnieDayToday (talk) 01:24, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:   bunny suit
Talk:Gold thioglucose

message: Gold thioglucose (tradename Auranofin®) is certainly an antiarthritic pharmaceutical, and also a Group 3 (IARC) carcinogen, but I ave never heard it described as a neurotoxin? Does anyone have any references for this? Physchim62 15:13, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Neurotoxin?

message: Gold thioglucose is going to be the same as the official termed existing article  Aurothioglucose (INN) so need to be merged together. This, having the formula C6H11AuO5S is NOT the same as Auranofin (INN) C20H35AuO9PS+. Likewise in UK we use Sodium Aurothiomalate instead of Aurothioglucose.David Ruben  Talk  12:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sort out of Gold salts
Talk:.mod.uk

message: Hi:
I think this is a stub and the subject of the article does not have many information left so I think this article should be merged into the .uk article.
Albert 15:35, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Will start now. - Ta bu shi da yu 01:53, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge it?
Template talk:Unknown license

message: This is supposed to be a non-threatening option that newbies can pick for image upload licenses. We would rather they pick this, which lets us know they need help, than for the user to incorrectly pick some valid license. The template is intentionally less threatening than the rest of our missing license templates, thus no stop-hand. When we see images tagged as such we should gently help the user fix it, with lots of wikilove. If there is a copyright problem, we can explain that too.. again with lots of wikilove. See WP:BITE. --Gmaxwell 15:53, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purpose 

message: Should this template put the image in :Category:Images with unknown copyright status, the same as :Template:No license? Stephen Turner (Talk) 11:59, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Now MediaWiki:Licenses does that, via Template:No license from license selector.  dbenbenn | talk 02:03, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Put images in Category:Images with unknown copyright status? 

message: I changed the wording from "an experienced editor should help the uploader…" to "a more experienced editor" because it implies the editor who uploaded the file has little or no experience. I wouldn't say that about me, and I uploaded a file which has a copyright status I am unsure of. I'm not very experienced with images, I'll say that, but I certainly know a thing or two about Wikipedia. Just a little thing, but wanted to mention it. --Fbv65edel (discuss | contribs) 19:51, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Experienced editors 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 04:07, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Template:Don't know →  – Too vague, could be confused with something else. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:09, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 March 2022
Talk:Daxam

message: Were the Daxamites described as descendants of Kryptonian colonists pre-Crisis?  Obviously, the story about the Eradicator affecting their DNA to give them the vulnerability to lead is a post-Crisis story, because the Eradicator didn't exist pre-Crisis.  But were there any pre-Crisis attempts to explain why the powers of Daxamites and Kryptonians were so similar? —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 19:45, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kryptonian origins 

message: Wouldn't it be far better to write many fiction articles in in-universe style, and just put a note at the top that the almost the entire article is written as a work of fiction?  I imagine that many people who read these articles would prefer this style anyway.  Perhaps you might only have the top level articles in non-fiction style, and more specific ones in in-universe style.
This would lead to a more useful 'document', even if it strays from the old-fashioned encyclopedia format a bit.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.212.11.161 (talk) 13:24, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: in-universe style 

message: Not sure where this came from.  Seems to be a fictitious entry.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.156.44.27 (talk) 05:45, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Kas Xion

message: Where is Daxam located?  I always thought it to be in the sagitarius constellation, where is Almerac located?  It should be in the andromedan or at least pegasus system.  Can some one site these, and where are the imperiex and dominators from?  OOooo The dominion must reside in the outer-most cosmos.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.255.42.105 (talk) 01:10, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Locations
Talk:Spontaneous combustion (disambiguation)

message: what does spontaneous mean? Static electricity can cause spontaneous combustion of clothing; see http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050916/od_nm/australia_electricity_dc;_ylt=AkJmhITPwFJI9OvirJfzVdCs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3ODdxdHBhBHNlYwM5NjQ- . 24.54.208.177 16:07, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. I'm glad we've fixed that problem. Cheers, CWC(talk) 07:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Maybe we should link to This is Spinal Tap, since so many people associate that movie with spontaneous combustion, and vice versa.
We could add a wikilink to the bullet point about spontaneous human combustion (though this violates the guideline about one link per item):
:* Spontaneous human combustion is the alleged phenomenon of a human being suddenly bursting into flames, as seen in the mockumentary This is Spinal Tap.
Alternatively, we could add an item to the "In popular culture" section:
:* The mockumentary film This is Spinal Tap mentions spontaneous human combustion.
What to other editors think? Cheers all the way to 11, CWC(talk) 07:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Gang - I have moved the mention of Spinal Tap to the spontaneous combustion (combustion) article.Steve 15:09, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I saw that. (That was good work, BTW). I'm asking whether we should mention it here as well. Thanks for your contributions, CWC(talk) 05:18, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to Spinal Tap
Talk:Process calculus

message: What should we say abou the historical relationship to the Actor model?   Nyaaard, Roscoe, der Roever, Hewitt, Hoare, Milner, etc. did their work contemporaneously  sometimes influencing each other in various workshops and symposia (especially memorable was an early summer school at Aarhus).  The published work has a fair number of cross references, acknowledgments, and citations.  Currently the Actor model and Process calculi are among the most prominent approaches being pursued.  Sometimes there are researchers who work in one of these communities who are unaware of research in the other community.  This is unfortunate.--Carl Hewitt 04:51, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical relationship to the Actor model 

message: Perhaps it is best to discuss the Actor model and process calculi in the article with this title rather than here, so I have added a See also link to this. JPB, 18 September 2005.
:I agree that some of the discussion belongs there.  However, some of the controversy over channels and mention of the historical connection also belong here.--Carl Hewitt 17:25, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actor model and process calculi 

message: I clarified the discussion in the article on channels and the Actor model.--Carl Hewitt 21:30, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarifed discussion on channels and the Actor model 

message: I have moved the material on the nature of process calculi to the start and the history/comparison to the end since the former is probably of more interest to the majority of readers. Jonathan Bowen 14:34, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved some of the history stuff to where it is more appropriate in Actor model and process calculi.  Also I introduced a paragraph at the beginning about the use of channels for communication as a fundamental characteristic distinguishing the process calculi from other models of concurrent computation.--Carl Hewitt 16:43, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

text: Thanks for correcting the link.  I think that your changes were an improvement.  Regards--Carl Hewitt 17:40, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restructuring 

message: I'm not sure what the paragraph about expressivity in the Current Research section is getting at. In particular, it draws a distinction between expressivity in the Church-Turing sense and a subtler, more human-oriented meaning (true enough). Then it cites as examples, among others, the fact that the π-calculus is more expressive than the asynchronous π-calculus but as expressive as the higher-order π-calculus. But these results concern precisely the Church-Turing variety of expressivity! Namely, async π can be translated (trivially) to π, but not all π-terms have equivalent async terms; however, higher-order π-terms can be “compiled down” to regular (first-order) π. Am I missing something?
Luke Maurer (talk) 05:25, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expressivity
Talk:Norwich Union

message: The available history is a bit twee and rose tinted (from this page and the heritage page linked to). For example it doesn't mention the horrendous losses in the period 1991-93 that led to severe financial difficulties for NUFIS and it's subsequent bailout by NULIS based on a poor balance of underwriting that then led to a lot of branch closures and redundancies.
This therefore gives a false impression of the history of NUFIS, and doesn't necessarily explain why a merger with CU and GA was a 'good' thing and was part of a larger movement of consolidation within the British general insurance market.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pgb62uk (talk • contribs) 10:34, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: History 1990's

message: How the hell can 1.26m fines plus a 11m+ payout be due to a "small case of fraud". Clearly its massive. No wonder they rebranded to Aviva.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.159.12.26 (talk) 13:36, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1.26M Fine 

message: This article is soon going to have to be renamed, as the Norwich Union name is being dropped in favour of Aviva, Any suggestions? Maybe "Aviva (UK)"?--FF3000 (talk) 15:57, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No. This article is about Norwich Union and its history  - which is of considerable significance in its own right. There is already a separate article on Aviva. Dormskirk (talk) 20:57, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New name 

message: Hello,
I work in the communications team at Aviva and would like to suggest a change to this page please.
Instead of linking out to Aviva's customer sales site can we offer a link to Aviva's heritage website instead please?  This contains lots of information about Norwich Union and Aviva's other heritage companies.  We think this might be more relevant and interesting to your users rather than a consumer sales page.
The Heritage site URL is:  http://heritage.aviva.com/
Thanks so much
HayleySandford (talk) 14:19, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Dormskirk (talk) 21:41, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  URL link