Talk:Veritas (political party)

message: First half is good but then it suddenly gets very confusing - we have a list of dates that are all 2005 (for a party that's only existed 6 months that's a bit confusing) and lots of random snippets - there's a slight NPOV problem (admittedly there's not much positive to say, but odd sentences are creeping in -"Patrick Eston changes his political party's quicker than most people change their socks.", etc.) and random inclusion of unrelevant Telegraph questions. The resignations list seems to do little other than 'rub in' their problems. The English also needs a good rewrite as does the formatting - more subheadings needed. 
Any other ideas? I'll do something on it soon... Me677 00:27, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: :Image:Veritaslogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:12, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Veritaslogo.gif

message: Hello, is there any source to delcare the current membership for this party?
Thank you.
(TheGreenwalker (talk) 14:48, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Membership 

message: The lead changes tense constantly. "Veritas (Latin: truth) was a political party", "Therese Muchewicz is the Party Leader", "Veritas has no representation in the Parliament of the United Kingdom, although it had a small number of members serve in the European Parliament and the London Assembly", "its leader Therese Muchewicz stood in Bradford West for the English Democrats...in the 2015 General Election". Is it currently in existence or not? The article needs to decide.  Scolaire (talk) 13:20, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is or was? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Veritas (political party). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070629182440/http://www.veritasparty.com:80/news.html to http://www.veritasparty.com/news.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:55, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified