lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sammy Swindell

message: There needs to be some additional information added about Sammy's racing experience before the 1983 "debut" noted.  I saw Sammy race in Jackson, TN on the dirt track in 1977.  He was great then and carried that experience forward. There needs to be a race history added showing what he did before he became famous. - Scott Sheeler (talk) 18:15, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of these racing driver pages need stuff like that. That'd be great to add, the catch is finding reliable sources from that time period. - The Bushranger One ping only 20:17, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions
Talk:Srirangam Srimad Andavan Ashramam

message: This page was created for educating people about a 300 year old institution called Srirangam Srimadh Andavan Ashramam. The article provides accurate historical and current information about the insitution. This article is by no means an attempt to advertise or to monetize in anyway. It is a legitimate information pertaining to the philosophy of Visishtadwaita. Please refer to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matha One could also google for Andavan Ashramam for more information.
Thanks/bramanuj
:Hello! The reason I flagged this article is because it appears much like ad copy (for example, "premium institution", "famous Arts and Sciences", and such other phrasing), with no reliable sources cited to indicate the notability of the institution (the sources cited tend to speak to the philosophy, not the institution, aside of course from the link to the institution's own site.) Are there any sources which might indicate why this institution is notable, and would allow a more neutral article to be written on it? Seraphimblade 07:33, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Serve-and-volley

message: I guess it is not entirely true that the server and volley is less tiring as one has to quickly move upfront following a serve. If the opponent is good at lobbying then the serve and volley player would end up running bbackwards as well. 59.92.202.230 07:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just Jack Kramer's opinion -- others would disagree with him.  Particularly these days. Hayford Peirce 15:20, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I added a description of the style that should make it easier for a non-tennis player to understand the article. I removed the Context tag. The article still needs to be better organized. MrVibrating 21:12, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro

message: It says here that Tilden maintained that a 'great' baseliner would 'by definition' (sic) beat a 'great' serve-and-volley player because the returns would be so good that the volleyer would be unable to volley them. But surely if the volleyer were as great a volleyer as the returner was a returner then he would be able to make the volley. The 'theory' does not stand up. Nicander (talk) 21:33, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tilden's 'Theory'
Talk:Married Life (2007 film)

message: "Harry and Pat continue to be on the periphery of their healing marriage." This would appear to have been written by someone who doesn't know what "periphery" means, but since I've not seen the film, I don't know what was actually met. Is it that they are starting the process of healing their marriage? Binabik80 (talk) 00:42, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  final sentence of plot summary
Talk:Smiley Face (film)

message: *Gregg Araki's Stoner Comedy
*Faris Gets High for Smiley Face
*Stoned Satisfaction
*Face Value
*The Ditz Ghetto
:Some articles to help build up this article--J.D. (talk) 19:38, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Headlines

message: I'd like to open a discussion about if this is realy a comedy film,
showing the downfall of a young drug addict woman i think its more of a drama.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.173.150.13 (talk) 11:39, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comedy?
Template talk:ABC New Mexico

message: Considering that KOAT monopolises ABC in New Mexico, and that these templates are designed to list stations within a particular state, then why do we have templates like these when only one station will be represented (not counting satellites)? 
And another thing -- use only the same colors that are used for the other templates -- the ones you used are not only atrocious, but hard to read. -- azumanga 07:47, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?
Wikipedia talk:CheckUser/Archive 1

message: __TOC__
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED into project namespace, per unopposed request, and because that's where it belongs.  Former location converted into a soft redirect, to avoid cross-namespace redirects. -GTBacchus(talk) 20:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
====Survey - Support votes====
# Recury 20:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: # Recury 20:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - Support votes
Talk:Mauritius Broadcasting Corporation

message: Bold textNeeds more cleanup work.  Am too tired to do it today but will try another day
Rkurzawa 08:02, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heading text 

message: I have removed the sentence "last updated by F. Caunyhe. Nov 2007"
This is an encyclopedia. Not a newspaper. Please refrain from putting your name at the end of paragraphs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MatchStickEleven (talk • contribs) 12:43, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heading text 
Talk:Clarity

message: This is a disambiguation page. I added a link to the Jimmy Eat World album Clarity'. Disambiguation pages are not intended to have topics, but rather to provide information on the various definitions of the term in question, and to link to all articles with similar titles or relevant themes. With that in mind, I have reverted the most recent edit. Rodeosmurf 08:05, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was originally a stub, but was possibly only a dictionary definition; it then became a stub with multiple topics and the others became separate pages with this left as a combined article and disambiguation page. The redirects from "Clearness" and "Elucidation" are for the article content, not for the disambiguation page - either this should be restored and split properly to Clarity (disambiguation) or the redirects should be deleted or retargeted. If an article already exists and clarity is just another name it should be added to the disambiguation page. Peter E. James (talk) 12:14, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Talk:The Enchanted Boy

message: Under 'interesting facts', it says "For strengthening of an image artists gave to the leader of a horde of rats of line (a bang on the head) and manners of behavior of Adolf Hitler (it is remarkable that the actor Sergey Martinson is voicing the Rat (in credits is absent) the first on the Soviet screen embodied Hitler in the movie "New Adventures of Shveyk")." Can someone please explain what this means?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ItsMichaelRay (talk • contribs) 23:13, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What?
Talk:Shizuku (video game)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to Shizuku (video game). There's consensus to move the article as it is not the primary topic, as indicated by various participants. Moving to alternate proposed title has it has unopposed support. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 15:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I have unintentionally broke the formatting of the initial message, it was originally meant to say that the amount of page views of related pages are small and similar to each other. Otemaci 15:32, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

text: @65.92.162.81 In hindsight, I should have realised this. If this move does not go through, I will make a new request with your proposed changes. Otemaci 01:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 October 2022
Talk:Lake Misurina

message: The text says " Near the lake is the only center in Italy for the care of childhood asthma". If that's the Istituto Pio XII, shown in the second of the three images in the gallery, then state it clearly because it's not obvious.
ICE77 (talk) 04:43, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of clarity
Talk:Boston Red Sox Hall of Fame

message: Your 2018 inductees are incorrect. You omit non-uniformed inductee Alphonso "Al" Green, who has worked for the organization for 44 years, mostly manning the Fan Services information booth. Pumpsie Green was not inducted. Instead, his debut as the team's first black player was designated a "Memorable Red Sox Moment." It might be argued that the prejudice  Pumpsie had to endure merits him a place in the Hall, but that would also apply to the Red Sox' second black player, pitcher Earl Wilson, who made his debut exactly one week after Green. Wilson certainly couldn't've had an easier time of it, could he? Thus the team commemorated the event, not the individuals. 108.49.32.70 (talk) 22:22, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  2018 inductees wrong
Talk:Ford C. Frick Award

message: I'm not sure that the current practice of linking a year to its corresponding HoF balloting is appropriate, as the balloting pages refer to Hall of Fame induction balloting only, and (rightly) make no mention of the Frick or Spink Awards.  Not linking at all would be more appropriate, IMO.  Thoughts? Brad E. Williams (talk) 12:52, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right.  It should only link to a page that directly concerns it. --Muboshgu (talk) 14:24, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool, glad I wasn't completely off my rocker. :-)  One other thing that I just noticed - shouldn't "Inductee" be "Honoree," per the Hall's official terminology? Brad E. Williams (talk) 14:26, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes you're right, that was my bad.  They're not technically inducted into the HoF. --Muboshgu (talk) 15:57, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

text: I went ahead and made that change here as well as on the Spink Award page. Brad E. Williams (talk) 14:34, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent. I took a quick look at that page before I left for work and realized it was more than a simple find-and replace, so I was gonna leave it for later. --Muboshgu (talk) 15:57, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linking to HoF balloting 

message: Isn't the Commissioner's title simply "Commissioner of Baseball", not "Commissioner of Major League Baseball"?  He has ultimate authority over all of "organized baseball" in North America (all of professional baseball except for a few minor "independent leagues").  72.104.144.56 (talk) 02:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Commissioner
Talk:BBWAA Career Excellence Award

message: There is a link to the wrong Charles Dryden. The right one has no biography page here. I'll note others if appropriate. . . . Dryden is the only one at the moment.
: Here is one biog blurb without vital data 
http://www.baseballlibrary.com/ballplayers/player.php?name=Charles_Dryden
: Here is one with vital data and link to obituary
http://www.baseball-fever.com/showpost.php?p=822146&postcount=12
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.241.123 (talk) 23:09, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: wrong Charles Dryden

message: Meet the Sportswriters by Bill Burgess at Baseball Fever provides some biographical data for all of the Spink Award winners and images for many of them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.239.216 (talk) 20:48, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  biographical data for all Spink winners
Talk:Major League Baseball Manager of the Year Award

message: What do you guys think about changing the table up a bit so they link to the individual team's yearly page, as opposed to the general season? IE, for La Russa's inaugural AL win it would link to 1983 Chicago White Sox season not just 1983 Major League Baseball season? Staxringold talkcontribs 03:09, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an award for the whole of Major League Baseball. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 12:14, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

text: *Right, but the pertinent season for the award is the season for the winning manager, not simply all of baseball. I'm much more interested in the 1983 White Sox when reading about La Russa's win than simply all of baseball in 1983. Staxringold talkcontribs 04:23, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: First, it doesn't link to all of baseball; it links to the MLB season. Second, you can go directly from that MLB season to the team season. It's one intermediate click, but the MLB season link is more valuable because it provides context (the only reason to link dates) to other events that happened in that year. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 11:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Season linking question
Talk:Philadelphia Phillies annual franchise awards

message: As you can see, the "See also" section is above the "Winners" section. The reason is that when I tried to put it below "Winners", it ended up in the lower-right corner of the "Winners" chart. If you can move "See also" below "Winners", it would be much appreciated. Thank you. Eagle4000 (talk) 02:57, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 12:35, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: formatting for "See also" section
Talk:Major League Baseball Player of the Week Award

message: To make this page more accessible, I suggest we link the first instance of each acroynm to its corresponding Wiki article, e.g. RBI, XBH, etc. Robert The Rebuilder (talk) 12:59, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - RoadView (talk) 17:01, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Decrypting the acronyms

message: Who makes the decisions for each league? What's the process? Who controls it? That's what I'd like to know.98.243.173.66 (talk) 21:21, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is the decision made? 

message: The lead is inaccurate; Albert Pujols won the award back in 2001. Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 15:07, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead

message: So all of the winners back to 1974 are available on Baseball-Reference and back to 1990 on MLB.com. Do we really want to list every single winner? This award has been given out about 1,200 times per league. Why does the current article only go back to 2008? Should this format instead be swapped for only listing multiple winners? Maybe list consecutive winners or the longest consecutive streaks or the youngest winners or oldest winners or longest period of time between wins or something?
Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 15:53, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of winners
Talk:Silver Slugger Award

message: I was not able to revert to the complete version, please someone fix that. Aladdin Lee 02:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone deleted a part of the article 

message: The article, unlike Rawlings Gold Glove Award, doesn't discuss how the majors decide who wins.  Nor is there a photo of a typical award. Will (Talk - contribs) 23:36, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - it is rather silly to make a list of ballplayers who have "won" this award without giving any information on the rationale on who is chosen. From looking at the list of winners, it is clear that the winner doen't have to be a "slugger" - though it helps! 74.163.42.144 (talk) 04:09, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How are the award recipients chosen? 
Talk:Sporting News Pitcher of the Year Award

message: Each league's section says the list is in chronological order, but the Starting and Relief winners are in reverse chronological order. Because I have only an iPad, i.e., not a desktop (with a mouse), I am unable to re-order the four sections by cutting and pasting. Eagle4000 (talk) 05:00, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronological order for starting & relief awards
Talk:Sporting News MLB Player of the Year Award

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 11:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 March 2021
Talk:Poussi

message: I moved this to Poussi and modified the name to "Serfinaz Qadry" as both of these are what IMDB uses and also what comes up best with Google searches  .  --Bossi (talk ;; contribs) 19:15, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Romanisation of Arabic
Talk:Baseball awards

message: There is an entry for "Baseball Prospectus Internet Baseball Rookie of the Year". When you go to the linked page, however, there is no mention of the award.  Should this award be deleted? Eagle4000 (talk) 04:53, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I found the award (and others) on the linked page, in the "Baseball products" section. I will add the various awards to the article. Eagle4000 (talk) 00:42, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Baseball Prospectus'' award
Talk:1845 to 1868 in baseball

message: Aren't these the silliest thing at wikipedia? Here is a special archive for them. --P64 (talk) 02:00, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdays 

message: I have deleted a link to 1781 to 1800 in sports, which is now a redirect to 1781 in sports. Probably those two pages were and are the rump of Pre-1850 in sports, ancestor to this article, which has now also spawned individual Years in Sports back to 1776. 
From 1776 to 1844, here are the Years in Sports with "Baseball" listings.
*1791 in sports
*1796 in sports
*1825 in sports
*1833 in sports
*1843 in sports
In the spirit of the former link to pre-1850 (if I am correct), this article would "See also" all of these pages. I don't recommend that, and I wouldn't list birthdays of early baseball people on those pages or here. --P64 (talk) 01:12, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Before 1845 

message: Seems to me that the beginning of this page need a rewrite according to this recent article. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/13/sports/baseball/13thorn.html?_r=2&scp=1&sq=John%20Thorn&st=cse
Ckruschke (talk) 15:30, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  MLB Historian revises baseball's history 
Talk:1869 in baseball

message: Here are the records of the professional teams in professional matches (W L T) and in all matches (v d n for victory, defeat, and no decision). This precisely follows Marshall Wright (no corrections), who generally tries to cover all matches between two NABBP members.
Club       	W 	L 	T	home            	v 	d 	n	comment
Cincinnati 	19	0 	 	Cincinnati      	57	0 	 	Cin. "Red Stockings"
Atlantic   	15	6 	1	Brooklyn        	40	6 	2	
Eckford    	15	8 	 	Brooklyn        	47	8 	 	
Athletic   	15	7 	 	Philadelphia    	45	8 	 	
Union      	12	8 	1	Lansingburgh, NY	24	9 	1	"Troy Haymakers"
Mutual     	11	15	 	New York        	36	16	 	
Olympic    	9 	12	 	Washington      	22	14	 	
Maryland   	7 	14	 	Baltimore       	14	13	 	
National   	4 	12	 	Washington      	13	13	 	
Keystone   	3 	17	 	Philadelphia    	12	21	1	
Forest City	1 	6 	 	Cleveland       	19	6 	 	
Irvington  	0 	8 	 	Irvington, NJ   	0 	9 	 	in Greater New York
While this may be useful for reference, my purpose is primarily sandbox. Beyond the obvious difference in layout, the non-numerical data differ slightly from those presented in the other table (see the article). --P64 (talk) 16:41, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Records of professional teams
Talk:Government Junta of Chile (1973)

message: Something seems to be missing in this sentence: "When General Pinochet took over as President, following a national plesbicite that approved a the new constitution." Vints 09:23, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:MLBAllStarGame

message: Anyone think of changing this template name from Template:MLBAllStarGame to Template: MLB All Star Games? 71.146.20.62 (talk) 05:13, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Since the 2020 game has been canceled, I understand the logic for the strikethrough of 2020. But the 1945 game was also canceled; why is that not indicated as 1945? Bob305 (talk) 16:58, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Therefore, I will be bold and make the change myself. Bob305 (talk) 05:50, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strikethrough on canceled games
Talk:Evolution (TV series)

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Eoireitum. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 13#Eoireitum until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Eoireitum" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Template talk:Boston Red Sox

message: I'm removing "Formerly the Boston Americans" - according to the main article, and the sources referenced there, "Americans" was never an official nickname.  "Red Sox" is the one and only official nickname in the club's history, and including "Americans" here gives an incorrect impression.  SixFourThree (talk) 21:13, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Boston Americans

message: The Boston Red Sox portal was recently deleted. I've removed the link from the template. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 11:58, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to deleted portal removed
Template talk:World Series

message: Articles such as 1885 World Series transclude this template but the template does not include a link for that article nor any of the other pre-1903 World Series articles. I will add those if there is no objection, but will keep them separate from the 1903 onwards articles. --Jameboy (talk) 00:54, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Pre-1903 World Series
Talk:Kim Jeong-hoon

message: I just read this article and was extremely annoyed at the little edits and vandalism throughout this article. I'm going to remove them but girls, who enjoy fangirling about him are just vandalizing this page. Should we lock or protect this page?
--Guruparan 17:19, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lock/Sem-Protect this Page?