lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Lazarus Effect (novel)

message: I am nearly certain that "lazarus effect" predated this novel but I forget the details. If I am correct then perhaps young people will never know the truth and believe that the term began with this novel. A Google search just finds more recent references. Sam Tomato (talk) 04:57, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Lazarus has of course been in use in several metaphorical senses since the time of the NT, including various constructions in which it is adjectival, i.e. lazarus something-or-other. Lazarus effect as such is of more recent vintage. Lazarus syndrome was first described in the medical literature in 1982. Lazarus effect is also in use as a synonym of Lazarus syndrome - if this is the sense you were thinking of, you are technically correct. We can even surmise that the phrase in this sense was in the news, in 1982, around the time the authors were deciding on a title (then again, they may already have chosen the title prior to 1982, since it continues the theme of Jesus incident).
2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:A47F:7C0F:CF94:F6CC (talk) 19:53, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: The underseas people are normal or at least not heavily mutated, and make up 90% of the population, it is said in the novel. The raft people make up the remaining 10% and they the ones that are heavily mutated.2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:A47F:7C0F:CF94:F6CC (talk) 19:46, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  the majority of humanity is heavily mutated from the genetic experiments performed by Jesus Lewis,
Talk:Havoc Pennington

message: Havoc is definitely notable. The article just needs to be improved. —mako๛ 02:47, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I fact-tagged mention of his advocacy of Gnome Online Desktop, rather than use http://log.ometer.com/2007-04.html as a ref: it's a personal blog, and appears to be on a personally owned site, so that it is not even reliable evidence that he said so-and-so at such-and-such time.--Jerzy•t 02:53, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gnome Online Desktop 

message: According to his linked in profile Havoc is now at Typesafe: http://www.linkedin.com/in/havoc
82.69.60.196 (talk) 06:52, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Havoc moved to Typesafe 

message: I am unable to find WP:RS. Not even this has any. WP:N not established.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  13:57, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prod 

message: https://lwn.net/Articles/625962/ 86.130.91.242 (talk) 14:25, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some more web links
Talk:Shmendrik, oder di komishe Chaseneh

message: I had to look up about 1/3 of the article "Abraham Goldfaden" and I had to look into the article "Yiddish theater" too, until I understood, that this operetta was written, originally, in Yiddish, and until I understood, that the spelling of "Shmendrik" with "Sh" as well as the spelling of "komishe" with "sh" is actually Yiddish, and has nothing to do with the English language.
Therefore, to save other readers time, I suggest, that these informations are included in the article, about like I expressed these informations.
Steue (talk) 10:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The spelling of the title of this operetta 

message: In this article the beginnning of the word "Schmendrik" of "(Schmendrik or The Comical Wedding)" is spelled with "c" but in the article Abraham_Goldfaden#Bucharest, second paragraph, last sentence "(Shmendrik or The Comical Wedding)" "Shmendrik is written without "c".
On the disambiguation page "Schmendrick" the translation is also spelled with "c", which might be a mistake too.
Steue (talk) 10:12, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The translated title: with or without "c"?
Talk:Populus deltoides

message: This section was added after I originally wrote the article, and frankly I don't see its point. It just seems to summarize the information already presented in the article text, which is why I tried to change its name to Summary of Physical Characteristics. Why shouldn't it be "Summary"? Is there any reason to even keep it? --Edward Tremel 01:41,
 18 November 2006 (UTC)
hello
I need to know... HOW TALL IS THIS DANG TREE!? YOU PEOPLE DON'T KNOW HOW DANG FRUSTRATING THIS IS!
you Are not helping with out telling us the Freaking USES!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.139.22.134 (talk) 13:27, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Physical Characteristics section

message: It is not a hard wood tree, the reason it is called the COTTONWOOD is because it's wood is soft, like cotton. I dislike false information in these Wikipedia articles. 66.103.120.151 (talk) 21:38, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Try reading the article, Hardwood, to find out why it is...and it is called cottonwood because of the annoying cotton strands that it casts everywhere and not the wood.⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 21:47, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Hardwood?

message: In the oldest and largest section, in Jan. 2016 somebody entered an unregistered tree from west central Oklahoma, then mentioned it was split in half.  This sounds like a double trunk and was probably never destined for the record books anyway.  I would recommend removing this (unreferenced) line. Nerfer (talk) 21:43, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of unregistered tree 

message: Why are the trees listed as wide and tall? Tall is fine, but I am quite sure that the trees are 88 feet tall and a 108 feet 'wide'. That would make them a Triangle. I have never seen one that was a triangle. Trees are listed in Wiki by height and either diameter or circumference at the base.
"California redwood.[4] It is an evergreen, long-lived, monoecious tree living 1,200–1,800 years or more.[5] This species includes the tallest living trees on Earth, reaching up to 379 feet (115.5 m) in height (without the roots) and up to 29.2 feet (8.9 m) in diameter at breast height (dbh)."
Msjayhawk (talk) 03:25, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Trees Wide??
Talk:KYND

message: This article is inaccurate as written (as of this date).  It states the station "holds" a construction permit for nighttime broadcasting.  It has only *applied* for a construction permit (December 4,2008).  The FCC has not approved the request yet, and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 08:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Schwag

message: Hi.  I thought those tags were fairly self-explanatory.  They both contain links to the relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines, which I highly suggest you guys read. Afterwards, if you have any questions, I'll be happy to try to answer them.  In the mean time, I'll address the points User:Runderwo raised.  Being around for fifteen years is not evidence of notability.  In fact, being around for fifteen years without ever releasing an album is strong evidence of NON-notability.  Hosting "dozens of festivals" might be worth mentioning in the articles about the festivals, but does not justify a separate article about the hosts.  As for the band's web page and messageboards, neither one meets Wikipedia's standards for reliable sources (especially not the messageboards), and, in any case, neither the web page nor the messageboards are properly cited.  Finally, Wikipedia is not a free webspace provider, social networking site or fan site; it is an encyclopedia.
Please note that I'm trying to be nice here.  I did not simply nominate the article for deletion, which is what many people would have done.   As an old Deadhead myself, I'm hoping you guys can find reliable, citable evidence of sufficient notability to meet Wikipedia's standards.  But I checked several standard sources, and found nothing.  I'm also someone who cares about the quality of Wikipedia, and the article, at present, simply does not measure up.  I suggest you guys study some of these policies and guidelines, and go out and find some reliable press coverage to cite, and see if you can come up with something a little more encyclopedic, before someone not-so-nice comes along.  And if you don't succeed, well, MySpace is thataway!  Best of luck, Xtifr tälk 01:46, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The evil tags
Talk:Zhengma method

message: The Chinese version of the page appears to be much more exhaustive, and the original page at Microsoft has been pulled, anyway. As a Westerner, I generally think that shape based input methods, as opposed to sound based input methods, are quite important for us in order to be able to write characters that we cannot read (Chinese have this problem to a lesser extent). Also, all methods that cover both traditional and simplified Chinese are highly relevant, as many people use the traditional characters, and I presently cannot judge which method provides the best coverage the most characters (eg, CangJie seems to have an artificial (?) "limit" of around 13.500 characters). If someone could translate the Chinese page, that would be great, but one would also need a place to do it piecemeal-wise (eg. it would take me several hours, if I could do it at all).
80.135.176.254 (talk) 00:38, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation of the method missing
Talk:Universe of Energy

message: The "Official Website" external link is dead. I didn't know if I should remove it. – AndyFielding (talk) 11:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 
Talk:Wonders of Life

message: It seems to never be open anymore.  Does anyone have any real information on this?  I've heard rumors, I've seen signs that point to this, but it just seems worng for Disney to pull the plug on this with no plan for it.
Colacadstink 14:35, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, its only open with big crowd time periods such as Christmas season and middle of the summer. --blm07 15:12, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks, but does anyone have any information on how/why this is seasonal?  Is it operating costs?  --Colacadstink 15:23, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I think that Wonders of Life is now over. I think that Disney might be planning an attraction to be housed in the building in the future...--Erik16 02:59, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The sign and Tower of Life (DNA chain) has been removed. The current rumor I heard is that it is being turned into convention center space. Very sad if true. --blm07 03:48, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is WOL Dead? 

message: If anyone is interested in translating this article into a different language (ie: Spanish, Japanese), please voice your acceptance below.
122.108.64.167 (talk) 10:47, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation of "Wonders of Life" Article into Different Languages

message: This article should have a head tagging it telling us that we need to distinguish it from a separate article in Wikipedia, which is on the television series which Brian Cox presented called "Wonders of Life". ACEOREVIVED (talk) 14:57, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation tag needed

message: In recent light, there is evidence of existence of the Wonders of Life video series (made in 1999, under Disney Educational Productions), and reference to them should be added to this page. Also, anyone reading this page and having ANY knowledge of having seen the DEP film series should also discuss here, recalling the premise and any relation to the pavilion's attractions.
27.253.69.62 (talk) 03:04, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disney Educational Productions
Talk:Japan Pavilion at Epcot

message: I've noticed that numerous items in this article are cited to a fan website. This would appear to violate verifiability, so we need to fix this. Anybody have any more reliable sources for this information so the article isn't loaded with "citation needed" tags everywhere?  —McDoobAU93 21:58, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent updates
Talk:Philippe Halsman

message: Quoted: "Another famous collaboration between the two was In Voluptas Mors, a surrealistic portrait of Dali beside a large skull, in fact a tableau vivant composed of seven nudes"
Carefully inspecting the picture you could count 8 people. Hint check the 'teeths'; or pairs of feet.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.243.4.35 (talk) 12:35, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Voluptas Mors - number of nudes 
Talk:United Kingdom Pavilion at Epcot

message: Is it not worth mentioning the Tigger Maze?--TimothyJacobson (talk) 16:45, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed the "move to Wikivoyage " tag. This article is too granular for a travel guide. The information here that is useful for travellers already appears in the Wikivoyage  article. Other information, like former attractions and performances, belongs in an encyclopedia, not a travel guide. Ground Zero | t 14:05, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Wikivoyage
Talk:Canada Pavilion at Epcot

message: For reference: there is a recording of a interactive kiosk at Epcot from 2002 that says the following: "... and with film titles like O Canada, Canada 67, and Portraits of Canada, one country has starred in more CircleVision presentations than any other." --blm07 00:21, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circlevision films 

message: The logo at the top (which I uploaded) appears to be acting funny. Can anyone help? Cheers from Malpass93 (talk) 20:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo? 

message: The section about the updated movie is confused.  It claims that the movie was changed because Canadians were complaining about stereotypes "like lumberjacks".  I've seen the old version of the movie a number of times and I don't remember a single reference to lumberjacks.  I just hope Disney hasn't ruined the movie while "fixing" it, as nearly happened to the China pavilion movie.
CharlesTheBold (talk) 04:55, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  why change the movie? 

message: Having just gotten back from EPCOT, I wanted to update my note above.  The movie has not been ruined, nor undergone a big improvement either.  Basically it plays up the urban areas while spending less time talking about the country's natural beauty.
76.122.75.89 (talk) 01:07, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The movie 
Talk:Irish Gambit

message: Sources for the name of this opening:  and a number of other sources from the Google search . Krakatoa 02:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: Chess.com and Lichess both list 1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 c5 as the Irish Gambit, though I'm not sure where they're getting this name from. ISaveNewspapers (talk) 06:38, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another same-named opening?
Talk:Mason Aguirre

message: Um, this reads more like a poorly written but enthusiastic press release from his agent than an encyclopedia article but I'm not going to get involved. Somebody with patience for wiki editing should have a go.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.96.90.70 (talk) 16:57, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Sheikh Imam

message: A number of ips have been recently adding this blog to the external links ,  and . The link is for a blog for a Canadian group performing Imam's songs which is not enough for inclusion as an external link. See WP:EL. The group itself is not notable enough and doesn't meet WP:BAND.  Google search for "Jawqet El-Shaeikh Imam"  retrieves very few results, mostly from the blogosphere. Furthermore, according to WP:EL, linking to blogs should be avoided. This type of editing is considered Spam and a vanity edit. I'm going to remove it again. Please don't re-add without further discussing.--Wedian 02:11, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, especially that the link is now broken and there's no online resources referencing anything about Jawqet El-Shaeikh Imam M7ama (talk) 20:24, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eljawqa Blog 

message: Hello everyone, I just wanted to explain why I think it's important to include information about Imam's songs related to the 1967 war in his Wikipedia page. These songs were significant not only in Imam's career but also in the history of Egyptian music, as they represented a unique departure from the mainstream musical culture at the time. By discussing the political and social themes present in Imam's work and contrasting them with the popular music of the period, we can provide a more complete understanding of Imam's impact and legacy. Moreover, his prosecution and imprisonment as a result of his political activism and outspoken lyrics make this a crucial aspect of his career that should be acknowledged. I believe these edits would enhance the page's comprehensiveness and depth, and I welcome any feedback or suggestions for improvement. M7ama (talk) 20:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  1967 Songs
Talk:Maelstrom (ride)

message: All this talk about Disney forcing people to watch the film is ridiculous. The only reason people have to wait in the holding area before the film is because a showing is still going on and there is no other normal exit. As soon as the doors open, the doors stay open at the exit of the theater as well. People always run to the other side thinking they don't have much time to escape, but the truth is there is plenty of time before everyone gets seated. --blm07 17:47, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The film 
Talk:Sky Masters

message: Article said at one point that Wally Wood don't ink anythink... but some lines later it's said that Wally Wood inked.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.122.13.174 (talk) 16:26, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ten years late, but the article is saying that Wally Wood didn't ink all of the strips, not that he didn't ink anything. --tronvillain (talk) 13:42, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wally Wood??
Talk:Disney's Polynesian Village Resort

message: I've recently completed a mass-rewrite and restructuring of this article. I have weeded out most of the apparent issues relating to NPOV and have added many references to help with verifiability. I believe this article could use more information relating to is conception, but as it stands now, should be a pretty solid B-Class article. csaribay (talk) 02:51, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Overhaul, 05/28/2008

message: As both a Polynesian fan and a Beatles fan I was fascinated by the bit about John Lennon. But I don't think it belongs in the opening section. PurpleChez (talk) 20:38, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lennon

message: Seriously? Does this need to be in this article? Is Wikipedia now going to list every single instance of someone being arrested or involved in an altercation at every single hotel, restaurant, and store on the planet? I'm going to remove this unless someone has a good justification for why this should be in here, beyond someone having a petty axe to grind. 2600:4040:7B78:1000:8956:6C74:DC57:2BF5 (talk) 13:39, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy Section?
Talk:Golden-mantled ground squirrel

message: anything on life span?
Are they really eaten by Jays?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.59.1.146 (talk) 16:25, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you even follow the weblink to the UICN? Surprisingly, they do believe in the animal... Some pages on google too... --summentier 14:11, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I took this image and uploaded it, it's available for addition to this article.
--EJFox 13:07, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since Wikipedia's not an image gallery, but Commons is, and since the Commons gallery is linked, I'm deleting the Images section here. --Justin (talk) 01:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Why is there no mention of Squeak the Squirrel, arguably the most famous of the golden-mantled ground squirrels? He figured out how to retrieve peanuts from a glass tube, a scientific contribution to which all the marvels of the modern age are directly attributable. Even Wikipedia itself would have been impossible to create without the ground-breaking work performed by Squeak during the halcyon days of peanut- and string-based research. Clearly, the least we can do to thank Squeak for his hard work and dedication to the promotion of science as a tool for the common good is mention him in this article. 67.68.48.148 (talk) 02:45, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Squeak may be mentioned if done so in accordance with WP:RS, WP:CITE], WP:N and other guidelines and policies. WP:TALK says "A heading should indicate what the topic is, but not communicate a specific view about it." I've changed it accordingly. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:11, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Squeak film
File talk:Heeley mosque during construction.jpg

message: Excellent. roundhouse 02:54, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My original intention was to show it completed, cut out of my Sheffield wide-pan from Meersbrook Park (on the sheffield page).  Which would you prefer?  L.J.Skinnersomething to say? 14:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I found the cut-out you mention - try both, perhaps reduced (I haven't had much to do with images on Wiki, as the business re atribution seems too complicated). No doubt the text on this will grow (biggest mosque in ... ?) and photos are always nice. A map for the Uni buildings would be nice too. I expect I know the Alfred Denny Building (possibly the one on the left before the roundabout - was an ugly grey until about ... 1985?). roundhouse 21:11, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Disney's Grand Floridian Resort & Spa

message: As of 2007, Disney's Grand Floridian Resort & Spa is not a five-star hotel. According to Mobil Travel Guide, it is a three-star hotel (out of five). Under the AAA "diamond" rating system, it is a Four Diamond hotel (out of five). Any claim that the Grand Floridian is a five-star hotel should cite a credible current source. —Whoville 11:15, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hotel rating

message: I cant find any reference to the practice of calling all male servers at Albert and all female servers Victoria no longer being done.  The only references I can find are that the practice still exists.  Anyone know of a reference otherwise?--Rtphokie 19:30, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Victoria and Albert 

message: Disney has never categorized the Grand Floridian Resort & Spa as its "flagship" resort hotel. Similarly, it's a matter of opinion to say that this is Walt Disney World's most "opulent" hotel, especially since the 2019 opening of Disney's Riviera Resort and the expanded renovations of Disney's Polynesian resort. Many respected travel guides rank other hotels as more extravagant and beautiful. 
I removed the reference to live orchestra and piano performances within Disney's Grand Floridian Resort & Spa. The orchestra was fired in 2020. https://wdwnt.com/2020/09/disney-provides-statement-regarding-the-firing-of-the-grand-floridian-orchestra/
 The pianist performs here often, but their performance schedule varies widely by the day. https://www.disneyworld.eu/entertainment/grand-floridian-resort-and-spa/grand-floridian-lobby-pianist/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 191.251.204.137 (talk) 13:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disney's Grand Floridian Orchestra was fired in 2020, other changes
Talk:FML

message: doesnt this also mean "fuck my life"? it seems like youth now a days make up more and more short forms, such as hXc and such. am i wrong? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.118.102.240 (talk) 03:07, November 18, 2006
:yes it does mean this —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.71.64.9 (talk) 02:27, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the info but one user seems to not agree with it being included on the page. Tinton5 (talk) 00:03, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment by 74.118.102.240
Talk:Martín Prechtel

message: It seems like there is some controversy regarding Martin Prechtel's biography, and the only sources for his biography here is his own testimony, which seems problematic. See further: http://www.newagefraud.org/smf/index.php?topic=242.msg1030#msg1030  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.71.60.131 (talk) 19:47, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree to having concern about this article. In looking further, I have not found other sources other than people repeating his accounts in interviews, and the facts of his having published books.Parkwells (talk) 14:26, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment