lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Broad-leaved tree

message: Obviously this article does not need to go into all details, but I think it still needs not to contradict facts or other wikipedia articles - and I think there is an issues, exemplified by the species Gingko biloba.
#The present article says "flowering plants [...] form the clade [...] angiosperms", but in the article Flowering plant, it says "[...] angiosperms [...] include [...] a vast majority of broad-leaved trees [...]". As I read it, "a vast majority" really should be "all" - or is e.g. the gymnosperm Ginkgo in fact also a broad-leaved tree? It is clearly a tree, and has broad leaves. Or is the rather descriptive "Broad-leaved tree" in fact too un-scientific for this question to have an answer?
#The present article also says "It is one of two general types of trees, the other being a conifer". What "general" means in this sentence is a bit unclear, but the article Tree, while admitting to some ambiguity in the term, says "The majority of tree species are angiosperms or hardwoods. Of the rest, many are gymnosperms or softwood trees; these include conifers, cycads, ginkgophytes and gnetales". Perhaps the present article should say "It is one of the two most common types of trees, the other being conifers", or perhaps: "Together with confiers, broad-leaved trees account for most types of trees"?
#Let me also mention that ferns according to the article Tree also may be called trees; they are not seed plants, i.e., neither angiosperms nor gymnosperms.
Nø (talk) 12:38, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exceptions
Talk:Pimpinella saxifraga

message: Burnet-saxifrage would need to redirect to Pimpinella when this exists. Normally in such cases the "typical" member of genus xy is unambiguously called "Common xy" and vernacularly just like the genus. In this case, I cannot find any reference suggesting "Common Burnet-saxifrage" is widely used. So "Burnet Saxifrage" refers to the most commonly seen species, while "burnet-saxifrage" could be any member (e.g. Greater Burnet-saxifrage, Pimpinella major), and the genus as a whole is "the burnet-saxifrages". Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 13:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Strip mall

message: The article already indicates that recent malls have pharmacies inside the stores, so this is no less relevant than that statement, which the editor did not delete. --Zeamays (talk) 19:25, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not saying it's not notable - I'm just saying that this is not necessarily the place for it.  Adding the information to grocery store or supermarket makes far more sense than adding it here, which is about the plazas themselves, and not about individual units in the plazas.  The passage you refer to makes sense, since it refers to formerly separate tenants, now one tenant.  The problem with the passage I've removed is that it doesn't make a connection to the makeup of strip malls, thus unless such a connection is made to strip malls, this is a trend better described in the other articles I mentioned.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:49, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Banks and coffee houses in grocery stores

message: What was the first srtip mall? Kortoso (talk) 23:10, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History? 

message: In 1949 town and country in Whitehall Ohio was the first strip mall in the country was designed and built by don castro 67.140.182.3 (talk) 21:06, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Any reliable source for verification of this? —ADavidB 04:28, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry but that's incorrect. The Park & Shop in Washington, D.C. opened in 1930 and fits the definition of strip mall: parking in the front, and 50,000 sqft in size. Keizers (talk) 14:45, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strip mall
Talk:Musa Javed Chohan

message: (Uchohan 17:58, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Calamondin orange

message: The two articles Calamondin and Calamondin orange should be merged.  They seem to be of the same topic.  Calamondin orange should probably just be a redirect page.
Plantboy1 20:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Merge - agreed, however, it should be noted that the taxobox entries for species do not match. -- • Kurt Guirnela • ‡ Talk 11:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/And Then There Were 10

message: I don´t understand the reason fot this delete, somebody can tell me, !WHY DELETE A PAGE OF A EPISODE OF BEN 10!
, the sequence are incomplete if somebody delete this page
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jocaypa (talk • contribs) 17:59, March 17, 2007  (UTC)
Already gave the reasons, but what the heck:
#WP:NOT#IINFO  Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, this includes plot summaries.
#WP:A There are no sources cited in the article.  I cannot find a reliable source to back up the plot summary.
#Read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS about "breaking the sequence"
--Phirazo 19:26, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Actually, the movie itself is a source.  Yes, it's a primary source, but Wikipedia only restricts the use of primary sources and does not disallow them entirely. -- Black Falcon 20:24, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why delete this page?
Talk:Caulerpa

message: Has Caulerpa really been eradicated from Southern California?  (as stated below)  This seems unlikely.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.210.86.247 (talk) 01:51, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've added both the refimprove and morefootnotes tags to this article. There is currently only one reference (Guiry & Guiry) and one item for "further reading" (Jacobs), and only one inline citation (for the number of species). I heard about Caulerpa for the first time less than five minutes before visiting this page to learn more, so I don't think I'm qualified to find and judge appropriate references. There are four external links. Could someone with knowledge in this area comment on whether these are appropriate references?
There are also some confusing parts of the page. I wondered the same thing as the unsigned comment from April 2010, and also whether Caulerpa had been eradicated only from southern California, or from the Mediterranean and Australia as well. YardsGreen (talk) 12:46, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation Tags 

message: dang this page is not well done * specifically it would be nice to know the date that it was realized that this cutie was one cell * the issues are that it contradicts the previous theories on nutritiant transport minimum distance defining the size of single cells * also how they evolved * i vaguely recal a *science* cover story on this organism * 173.9.46.137 (talk) 15:10, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  date of discovery and importance of the species 
Talk:Celtuce

message: Zelchenko: I see that you posted on Village pump (policy)] based on the incorrect idea that Baidu is "blacklisted". As far as I can tell, it is not blacklisted -- I just tried to use it and got the deprecation warning, which is a warning. I regret that Headbomb seems to have given you the wrong impression by reverting with the edit summary "bypassing the blacklisted domain is a no no", but I am not supporting re-insertion of the cite. I just wanted to clear up this part of the issue -- you should have been able to cite Baidu if it had been necessary. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 16:52, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citing Baidu
Talk:Chamaedorea

message: See: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17343037
15 March 2012 Last updated at 07:50 GMT
Global flower trade threatens rare palm
Ref.: Scientific name: Chamaedorea ernesti-agusti  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.129.128.7 (talk) 17:37, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent news 

message: What does it mean when your palm tree  has brown tips? 2601:14A:C000:230:F0B9:52C9:37B3:889D (talk) 16:00, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brown tips
Talk:Nut allergy

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nut_(fruit)#Nut_allergy contains further information about nut allergy. The two texts should be harmonized. --80.98.231.27 18:08, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nut_(fruit)#Nut_allergy 

message: Why was this redirected from "tree nut allergy". It is almost always called a "tree nut" allergy to emphasize that peanuts and other things are not included. 70.110.195.106 (talk) 16:40, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tree nut allergy 
Talk:Scilla luciliae

message: See my comments at Talk:Scilla sect. Chionodoxa about deciding which name refers to the common garden plant. In editing this article, I've taken the position, based on the RHS bulletin referenced in the article, that C. luciliae is not the correct name. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:42, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Identification
Talk:Chromolaena odorata

message: Boppré M et al: Pharmacophagy in grasshoppers? Zonocerus being attracted to and ingesting pure pyrrolizidine alkaloids. Entomology: experimental & applied 1984; 35: 115-117  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.143.40.139 (talk) 12:13, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
File talk:Mmjitstillmoves.jpg

message: I don't know if it's legal to put this image on here, but a larger size album cover is hosted by Amazon.com here: http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0000C0FBM.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
:It's probably better to keep the low-resolution image, so as to better work under the image's licensing. --GVOLTT How's my editing?\My contribs 00:36, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Cinnamon basil

message: Google shows 69,400 results for "cinnamon basil" and only 5,780 result for "Vietnamese basil", of which many don't even refer to "cinnamon basil" but just to Vietnamese basil dishes which are often made with other kinds of basil. Per WP:COMMONNAME, the article should be reverted to Cinnamon basil. - Takeaway (talk) 07:56, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cinnamon basil is a more common name in English than Vietnamese basil 

message: This article is a mess, mainly in that it has conflated "Vietnamese basil" with cinnamon basil. It's unclear from my research whether there even exists a cultivar as "cinnamon basil"; what I am more confident in is that "cinnamon basil" at best refers to two different kinds of basil: First, a basil that contains cinnamate, and second, a basil that is either the same as Thai basil (i.e., a synonym for a cultivar like 'Siam Queen'), or some kind of particular cultivar of Thai basil. It doesn't help that plenty of sources online seem to be using Wikipedia as the original reference. This will take some deeper research to sort things out, but for now, I think any reference to its usage in Vietnamese cuisine really should be in the Thai basil article (which also needs some work, as does the main basil article). Talu42 (talk) 03:11, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Very confused article
Talk:Citrullus

message: What is the etymology of "Citrullus" and does it have anything to do with "Citrus"? Badagnani (talk) 03:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: :
Does this mean that what Thunberg collected and called lanatus is not what is now called lanatus (watermelon)?  If so, it could be said more clearly; "this plant" is very ambiguous. —Tamfang (talk) 02:55, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  run that by me again? 

message: The first paragraph under Taxonaomy begins by stating that C. P. Thunberg, who has not been previously mentioned in the article, made a mistake. Has a section of text been clumsily removed from this article? --RJBowman (talk) 17:23, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thunberg Non Sequitur
Talk:IQ and Global Inequality

message: Honestly, I don't see the commonsense or logic to add an map showing "I.Q statistics from 2002"  which is less informative than the list ( that someone removed) which already showed way better and accurate information that displays the number of I.Q scores in each countries from 2002. And their both basically the same thing, only difference is the list was way more accurate and informative on statistics. How exactly do we know which country has the highest I.Q to lowest I.Q? please stop vandalism and reducing accurate information. (And sorry for my english). WarriorsPride6565 (talk) 6:51, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Request to add back the list of I.Q scores

message: There is now an SVG version available https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:World-iq-map-lynn-2006.svg of the map with the following improvements:
# it leaves countries that are not estimated in the book flagged as NA
# the legend is consistent (one bucket is missing it the PNG version)
Olivello (talk) 07:27, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added your information in the Wikicommons page. I will replace the PNG version with your SVG version in the article. Veverve (talk) 23:08, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Serbia and Montenegro did not exist at the time of the study yet they were given 93 as if they were? The article goes by equal to or great than which makes sense as 5 number intervals. Yet the map itself uses greater than 85, or greater than 90? 74.101.190.2 (talk) 23:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legend inconsistency on world IQ map 

message: Pick another card, because this one is absolute rubbish!
Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen used IQ tests of children aged between 13 and 16 years old from 1952. Very reputable both of them. Later they had to correct their data.
Unfortunately, this information has already been spread by equally dubious authors in several books, for whatever reason. Now is the Average iq for Croatia 99.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229401257_National_IQs_calculated_and_validated_for_108_nations 
	
Many of the most intelligent people in the world come from Croatia and you should accept that!
Three Croatians on the list of the smartest people alive today.
https://www.croatiaweek.com/3-croatians-make-30-smartest-people-alive-today-list/
The World Genius Directory Geniuses 
http://psiq.org/home.html
At least 7 Croats are among the 200 most intelligent people in the world.
IQ Score: 192, 183, 180, 174, 163, 160, 151 
Approximately 7 from Germany - 182 He is Turk not even a German, 165, 158, 156, 156, 153, 147
Approximatly 5 from France - 162, 158, 154, 150, 141
Approximatly 7 from the United Kingdom - 171, 167, 163, 153, 148, 144, 135
Approximatly 38 from Japan
Approximatly 30 from China 
Approximatly 14 from Korea
Approximatly 21 from Italy
Four Croats have a higher IQ than the highest IQ-Score for Germany (182 is a Turk) and the United Kingdom and even five Croats have a higher IQ than the highest IQ-Score for France.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.25.6.141 (talk) 12:54, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Croatia
Talk:Combretum caffrum

message: Created combretastatin page.
Silverweed 03:18, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Copaiba

message: I looked through Wikimedia and found three images related to Copaiba (one being on the main page already). The other two:
Image:CopaibaOleoresin.png|Copaiba (Copaifera officinalis) Oleoresin in clear glass vial.
Image:CopaibaEssentialOil.png|Copaiba (Copaifera officinalis) Essential Oil in glass vial.
There isn't a nice way to add these to the main article without it appearing too cluttered. Maybe all three images can be added to a 'gallery' section until more substance is added to the article? Tevonic (talk) 16:46, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: The fist sentence says that it is a stimulant, but does not cite any references for this claim. In what way is it a stimulant? Is there legitimate research to back this statement? ThreeRocks (talk) 01:25, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  In what way is copaiba a stimulant?
Talk:Mathura lion capital

message: The word "dhamadana", should it be corresponded to "𐨢𐨨𐨡𐨣" ?
"𐨪𐨨𐨡𐨣 " would be ramadana.   𐨪 represents the r, see https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+10A2A  --Hermes Antinous (talk) 05:16, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should it be "𐨢𐨨𐨡𐨣"
Talk:Gypsophila vaccaria

message: GLOND!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.130.44.5 (talk) 19:45, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

message: in zipcode zoo you can find some more spicies so Vaccaria hispanica are not the only one. -yona bendelac (discussion) 22:39, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  only one spice in this genus?
Talk:Cucurbita foetidissima

message: I find long sentences and paragraphs difficult to read. 
Is there some way to put the list of common names for the cucurbita foetidisima in the format of a bulleted list or a table? 2601:280:C001:E590:4ACD:8168:F332:1FF6 (talk) 15:35, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Putting common names in a list or table 

message: Is "wagmúza" the name of Cucurbita Foetidissima in the Dakota Language? If any body editing wikipedia has ansestors who were Dakota or friends who are descended from Dakota Native Americans, can you ask them to verify? I read on the internet that the name might be "wagmúza", but the source was not a Native American person, and I am not sure that "WAHGMOOZA" was the word used by people living in the Great Plains of North America in the year 1700. Muldoonsamuel55 (talk) 14:02, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think this species occurs in areas inhabited by the Dakota people. Plantdrew (talk) 16:30, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

text: @Muldoonsamuel55 It is not very helpful to readers to add a table that repeats information elsewhere on the page so I am going to revert that edit. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 20:39, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of Cucurbita Foetidissima in the Dakota Language
Talk:Cucurbita moschata

message: Assessed as a low importance stub covering a small set of cultivars of the gourd family. --Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 03:33, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WPFood Assessment 

message: This species includes calabaza, does it not? Badagnani (talk) 00:55, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Calabaza]]

message: "Evolutionarily speaking the genus is relatively recent in origin as no species within the genus is genetically isolated from all the other species."
This is not necessarily true - as well as "recent" being unqualified a lack of genetic isolation does not necessarily mean a genus is younger than one in which species are isolated.
"C. moschata acts as the genetic bridge within the genus and is closest to the genus' progenitor."
The idea of extant species being closer to the common ancestor of a genus is not valid - all extant species are equally closely related to their most recent common ancestor. The source only calls C. moschata the "putative ancestor of the group" without giving much evidence for it. Iacobndg (talk) 17:41, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If there were evidence with a date range provided, it could be said that the diversification of species within the genus was relatively recent, which, I agree, is not quite the same as saying that the genus is relatively recent in origin. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:01, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

text: I've attempted to re-write what the source says in more modern terminology without distorting the original meaning. The source does suggest that C. moschata may be closest to the most recent common ancestor of the genus, but its position in the cladograms given doesn't support this. If you're not happy with my attempted re-write, then just delete this material; it's based on a pre-molecular phylogenetics source and isn't central to the article. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evolutionary History
Talk:Cucurbita pepo

message: Would this article work better if all the different varieties of C. pepo were merged back into this article?  Some of them are looking pretty stubby, and a single 'overview' article might work better.  I've no real view either way, but I thought I'd start a discussion.FlagSteward 11:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: Isn't dumpling squash/sweet dumpling squash a member of Cucurbita pepo? Badagnani (talk) 01:13, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dumpling squash

message: As observed on March 30, 2009, there was a collision between images and text such that some text was buried beneath an image. I am not expert in solving that problem on wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beofluff (talk • contribs) 16:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  VISUAL LAYOUT
Talk:Cutty grass

message: Merge with Toetoe, they are essentially the same articles anyway. The 'Cutty grass' name is by no means enough material to merit a complete article on its own. A 'Cutty grass' section in the Toetoe article will suffice I think. FelisLeoTalk! 10:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Dennis Alexio

message: IKF.com no longer exists and the PKA.com is apparently now owned by a greek fraternity. I am removing the section that mentions Alexio appears on both of their lists of greatest fighters.
Machine Man (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: PKA.com and IKF.com

message: For a guy with a listed record of 70-2, there really ought to be at least some sort of record in this article. But several Google searches have yielded nothing. If others know where to look, by all means, pass along the information.
Machine Man (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Record Notably Absent
Talk:Alaria esculenta

message: Osborne 16:12, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Actually, the name historically has always been badderlocks, which appears in Lightfoot's Flora Scotica (1777). The form "bladderlocks" is a mistake, and "dabberlocks" seems to be a recent variant. Myopic Bookworm 17:19, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=Alaria+esculenta+cobalamin&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
* http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=Alaria+esculenta+cyanocobalamin&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
* http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=Alaria+esculenta+vitamin+B12&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--222.64.215.115 (talk) 04:51, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  VB12 and the food.... 

message: I suggest some of the features used to describe "Alaria" in-fact may refer only to A.esculents. The illustrations are the same! I know of only one species of the genus however!!
13 species are listed under "Alaria" - q.v.Osborne 19:49, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Probable confusion
Talk:French Prairie

message: *http://www.dialoregon.net/~clenzen/firstsettlerssp.html Reference to Lucier as first settler
*http://www.oregonpioneers.com/marion/history.htm
*http://www.dialoregon.net/~clenzen/sphistory.html
Katr67 (talk) 21:52, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible refs for expansion 

message: When I started this article, I didn't think Wallace House was within the bounds of what was considered French Prairie, although it certainly should be mentioned. According to this map, I think Wallace House, at least as far as researchers have been able to determine, is a significant distance south of the traditional boundaries. http://www.friendsoffrenchprairie.org/documents/French_Prairie_Map_by_land_type.pdf This also puts it out of bounds. https://www.willametteheritage.org/assets/LaRC/bios_histories/Willamette_Mission.pdf Let me know if there's any objection to a slight rewrite.
Valfontis (talk) 05:50, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wallace House Location
Talk:Dark opal basil

message: Red rubin basil isn't notable enough to warrant its own article. I propose it be merged into this article if a reliable source can be found to describe it. --Drm310 (talk) 23:34, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like Red rubin is being widely grown (lots of seeds merchants shock) and it was a "1992 All America Selections Winner". Having said this, I can't find evidence at the AAS website. On balance, given that the merge is now stale (no comments since proposal almost 3 years ago), I'll close the merge.Klbrain (talk) 06:06, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 