Talk:Mobile Suit Gundam

message: I went ahead and took the liberty to add a list of Video Games to the section.  I included two lists: the first one lists games that have made it to America that contain 0079 mobile units; the second list contains current generation video games that include said suits (which of course, means nearly all of them thanks to Bandai and Banpresto...).  I left out the Super Robot series, since despite the inclusion of Gundam MS and characters, they have exceptionally little to do with the story...--208.104.224.37 03:30, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Video Games

message: I'll just post what I posted in the discussion for the other page.
"I've often been to some of the Gundam pages and noticed a lack of episode summaries. As I looked at the Gundam page, I thought to myself. I'd recently rented the first two DVDs of the set from Netflix, so why not do it myself? I've done the expansion and revision of the Harvey Birdman, Attorney at Law episode guide, and already had the rest of the series waiting to be shipped at any moment. Therefore, I've begun the project of creating episode summaries for the entire Mobile Suit Gundam series. I hope you all enjoy."
So, you can visit.  I've linked to it on the Gundam page where the episodes are.  I just got the third DVD in the mail, and will work on that.  Unfortunately, the fourth one is on "very long wait", so I don't know how long it will be until I can get that.--Silent Wind of Doom 23:20, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's ok. I've added character bios for almost all of the characters on the Gundam 0080 page, but I'm unsure how to properly insert the character pics. Anyway, I could do summaries for those eps and 0083 eps too. But I haven't seen a lot of Anime series pages with summaries.--Zenigundam 20:58, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode Guide

message: Since I'm restructuring all Gundam-related pages, please be patient until my work is finished.
I recently helped restructure the Gundam SEED/Cosmic Era section, and I intend to format these pages in a similar way.
My edits to this an other pages include:
* new templates, for Universal Century and for Alternate Timelines (done)
* adding the template to all pages (done)
* removing the old (incomplete) template (done)
* restructuring categories (done)
* merging pages with small content into more comprehensive pages and redirecting (done)
* creating unique pages, for all the series of the UC, for mobile units (done), ships (done), characters (to do), locations (to do), nations (done)
* moving all suitable material to those pages, cleaning up the individual series' pages (work-in-progress)
* creating history pages, containing detailed chronology of the major events (work-in-progress)
* moving all the episode titles listings into a single page (done).
Ideally, in my view, a page about a series should contain only general info, production info and a small synopsis. All material that is common to more than one series (characters, ships, mobilesuits, history) should go on dedicated pages.
For the same reason I moved the episode listings to a unique page. This information is not essential, and lenghtens unneccessarily the page. If needed, the info is on the Comprehensive Episode Linting page, as clearly indicated in the template.
If you do not agree just state it here and we can discuss a common approach. Cooperation is not only welcome, it's essential. --IgorTrieste 08:28, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restructuring 

message: Do as you see fit. If this is your idea of collaboration, go ahead. I will not edit this page anymore, nor will a touch any pages you so intelligently decide to revert; after all, discussion means you just say "no it's not right" and revert, right? Explanations, mediations, agreements are for idiots, you certainly don't need those. You don't care for my edits, and that is enough. THIS is what I mean for Wikipedian... boldly revert anything you do not see fit.
BTW, by several people I usually intend somewhat more than two...
Anyway I will not lose more of my time after you. --IgorTrieste 09:06, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: go ahead...

message: As one who has not seen this series (don't look at me like that!) it is a bit irritating to see nothing in the way of a synopsis in the article.  Surely we can do better than that!  --King of All the Franks 01:56, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  A gripe 

message: A gundam game that actually looks like some fun! Gamevideos snagged some footage from the Japanese import.
http://gamevideos.com/video/id/9647
-Jay —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jayfresh006 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Gundam Musou import footage (videogame) 

message: I am pretty sure Tomino was referring to the sound quality of the original TV series, not the sound quality of the movies.  In that same quote he is clearly referring to Bandai's decision to only release an English langauge track on the series DVDs.  As it was the Japanese-langauge version of the movies were released in the US on DVD. JoeD80 (talk) 19:58, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sound Quality 

message: There is a Japanese version for both the Beginning/End Credits, and a another set that was used when it aired on Cartoon Network. This is not mentioned on the page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.185.181.113 (talk) 19:43, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beginning/End Credits 

message: For the second and third movies, the distinction should be made as to whether those are the songs listed in the original release or remastered 20th anniversary edition. There was some switching around. The original end credits for Movie II didn't have a vocal piece, just moody music. Isn't Soldiers of Sorrow the piece that was sung originally during the battle at Jaburo? And then moved to the end credits for the re-release? For the third movie, Encounters is mentioned. But I'm not sure whether or not that refers to what I like to call Lalah Sun's theme (Gundam fans might know what I mean) or that other piece with the Engrish lyrics "Yes my Sweet, yes my sweetest.". Maybe someone can clarify that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr. ATOZ (talk • contribs) 15:19, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music during Gundam movies end credits 

message: Hi, I'm about to bring across the content from the "Project V" article. Sorry to dump a heap of unreferenced text into this article, but my intention is to bring it together so it can be improved. Hopefully there is some stuff that can be salvaged. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 08:56, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project V content 

message: I think White Base should be merged with the general article about MS Gundam. Though the White Base article has some merits and relevant analyses, thanks to its "Development" section, I don't think the vehicle itself has demonstrated notability outside of affilitated sources, as it only gets trivial or inconsequential mentions (such as being featured in an obscure listing). The details on the WB creation are interesting, but generally fit the overall themes of mecha design in MS Gundam, and of the conflict between Tomino and sponsors. All these comments (which are not too long) should be included here because they'd give more substance to Mobile_Suit_Gundam#Original concept and development, which would help the article reach GA status. The rest of the WB article being plot summary, it could easily be used to flesh out Mobile_Suit_Gundam#Plot if necessary. As it is, I don't see how keeping the details on WB separate would benefit anything.Folken de Fanel (talk) 16:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Unconvinced, and don't think it is a good idea, generally speaking, I am against this idea, but I don't really care if you do a good merge and write up that can actually get the article to GA status.  —Preceding signed comment added by MythSearchertalk  19:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

text: The so called merge was actually a deletion with no consensus.  You who proposed the merge did not include any of that article's reliable sources.  I'm reverting. —Preceding signed comment added by MythSearchertalk  15:23, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That is perfectly inaccurate as I did merge content to the article. I merged everything that I considered valuable, but any user remains free to move as much content as they think is necessary. There is neither a valid reason, nor consensus, to restore the article itself. Move more content if you want, but do not touch the redirect.Folken de Fanel (talk) 19:33, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You so called consensus is actually inaccurate.  I did give opposition and agreed only conditionally.  Thus you have no consensus if you did not meet the condition I gave. —Preceding signed comment added by MythSearchertalk  08:20, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_Base&action=history is still accessible, from then on there's nothing more than I can say other than you do not have neither consensus nor reason to undo the merge.Folken de Fanel (talk) 10:44, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  White Base merge 

message: Animefringe: vol. 1
--Lucia Black (talk) 06:53, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Review(s)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mobile Suit Gundam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090813121403/http://www.animeigo.com/Liner/MACROSS.t to http://www.animeigo.com/Liner/MACROSS.t
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mobile Suit Gundam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080830085019/http://www.animenation.net/blog/2008/06/24/ask-john-which-anime-have-been-ahead-of-their-time/ to http://www.animenation.net/blog/2008/06/24/ask-john-which-anime-have-been-ahead-of-their-time/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:27, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: The infobox lists a Manga written between 1979-1980, but I can't find any proof this existed. Could someone add a citation to a source proving that it is real if it is? Otherwise, it should be removed.
AnyGuy (talk) 06:37, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  1979 Manga