Talk:Emmanuelle

message: I have removed the reference to the MPAA as the film was rated X (or equivalent) all over the world. The usage in the article made it sound as though the film makers did it deliberately so the MPAA would give it an X rating. This is of course not true, a French film maker would have little interest in what an American censor thought of his film. Mallanox 22:51, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And I'm reverting it back. For one thing the X-rating was a major part of its North American publicity and and MPAA is the only body that ever gave out an X rating. The French never had one, nor did the Brits or the Canadians. 23skidoo 02:08, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is not correct, see article x-rated. Both the UK and France had an x-rating. To say that the film embraced the MPAA's x-rating suggests that they tried to get the MPAA to give it one. As stated before, a French film-maker wouldn't care a hang for the MPAA. Yes, they embraced the x-rating but not specifically that given out by the MPAA. Mallanox 00:05, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  X-rating 

message: I'm sure that the novels by Emmanuelle Arsan came before the films. There should be a disambiguation page to distinguish between these and the later films. The books are better btw. SmokeyTheCat 15:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Reference added. Actually, this is quite unclear, but it has been widely reported that the actual "Emmanuelle Arsan" was, either Louis-Jacques Rollet-Andriane, or possibly both spouses. Wedineinheck (talk) 22:04, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The original books 

message: :Image:Emmanuelle 4.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:38, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Emmanuelle 4.jpg

message: I'm evidently missing the point of these films, but there's no mention at all as to what the plot actually is.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.117.25 (talk) 21:22, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot? 

message: This article erroneously states that none of the hardcore sequences filmed for later films made it into any released versions. In the early 1990s I rented Emmanuelle 6 in Canada and it was a hardcore version. The scene involving Christele Merault included penetration and closeups. Unfortunately I can't add this to the article because without some sort of source it'll just be removed. 68.146.41.232 (talk) 15:39, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Error re: hardcore

message: The filmography list should also specify which are the "offical" ASP films.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.240.33.113 (talk) 18:59, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ASP films