lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Causes of mental disorders

message: I'd like to get a consensus on the following:
There is a theory out there that the cause of some disorders may be attributable to neuron cell types (electrophysiological, morphological, or genetic)
such that disorders don't arise out of dysfunctional brain regions but out of a dysfunctional specific cell type no matter where it occurs. this type of theory may explain why some disorders are difficult to locate on a brain scan (note that most research-grade MRI's don't have the resolution to see beyond individual Cortical minicolumns which are about 1mm^2 surface aria)  
for more information see the Q and A at the end of this talk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCANsfHAS5I
if you want to know about cell types in general visit the Allen institute for brain science youtube channel. They have great talks on the subject.
https://www.youtube.com/user/AllenInstitute/playlists
should this information be entered in the article?RJJ4y7 (talk) 14:54, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  neuron cell types as a potential cause of mental disorders 

message: — Assignment last updated by MoussaSl (talk) 15:15, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Intro to Psychology

message: — Assignment last updated by MeadorBriannaM (talk) 05:15, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Neuroscience
Talk:Chuck Berry

message: "During this time, Berry began using Wayne T. Schoeneberg as his legal counsel." - why is this important? Seems more like a vanity edit that slipped through, no citation given anyway.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.197.181 (talk) 23:40, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Is his lawyer notable?

message: In 2020, the International Astronomical Union named a small crater on Mercury after Chuck Berry.
https://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/Feature/15937
The Legacy section is semi-protected so I didn't add this myself but someone should. Jstuby (talk) 16:33, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:52, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Added by Neveselbert. Msoul13 (talk) 22:09, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crater 

message: There is an allegation on this page stating that Chuck Berry videoed himself urinating on women. Three articles are cited as sources; one is from a satirical magazine similar to MAD Magazine and The Onion, the other two make no mention of these allegations whatsoever. There is no evidence to support this claim. 2601:184:497F:8D80:117A:5CA0:832A:4E8 (talk) 08:44, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it should be removed. --195.99.227.0 (talk) 01:14, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unfounded allegations not supported by links in article. 

message: In the section titled "Physical and sexual abuse allegations", there's a discussion of videos of Berry urinating on a woman and her defecating on him. These acts are specifically described as presumably consensual in the cited source. They don't belong in a section about abuse allegations. There's no section where they do belong, so I'm deleting that sentence. Izzy Grosof (talk) 04:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consenual acts don't belong in the "Physical and Sexual Abuse Allegations" section
Talk:Vibrio cholerae

message: Looking up on cholera in my encyclopedia set, I found a little bit on the bacteria Vibrio comma. I believe this was possibly an older name for Vibrio cholerae? Nonetheless, the text reads that 
The encyclopedia in question is the Funk and Wagnalls New Encyclopedia, Volume 6, pages 79-80. The copyright year is 1979. CanbekEsen 05:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC )
The discovery of Vibrio Cholerae was made by Pacini in 1854, who found curved bacteria in intestinal contents of cholera victims. 
However, Robert Koch, who studied cholera in Egypt during 1883, demonstrated that the cholerae disease was caused by a comma-shaped organism, which he named Kommabazillen. This work by Koch initially gained alot of attention and overshadowed the work of Pacini. 
For several decades, the name Vibrio Comma was also used. Finally, the pioneering work of Pacini was recognized and the name was changed back to Vibrio Cholerae. 
Read more in: J.B. KAPER, J.G. MORRIS, JR., AND M.M. LEVINE, Cholera, CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, Jan. 1995, p. 48–86 
85.224.21.147 (talk) 22:48, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History: Pacini and Koch 

message: Anyone know? aerobe, anaerobe, facultative, etc? This guy ( http://trishul.sci.gu.edu.au/courses/ss12bmi/micro_groups/fac_anaerobes.html ) seems to say it is a facultative anaerobe.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.84.140.127 (talk) 21:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Added "facultative" to the description.  --Synaptophysin (talk) 16:49, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oxygen Usage? 

message: The Taxon Bacteria was reassigned the rank of domain a number of years ago now, so I have corrected this. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 03:33, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Domain, not kingdom
Talk:Megacity

message: Why are some of the numbers in the table red? -- Beland (talk) 04:27, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It means that the figures don't meet the 10-million criterion to be a megacity.Bluesatellite (talk) 04:35, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table color 

message: This states at the very beginning of the article that a megacity is defined as a "city" with a population of 10 million people or more. That is not correct. A megacity is defined as a "metropolitan area" of 10 million people or more, not a "city" of 10 million people or more. New York City, Los Angeles, London, Paris, none of these cities have a population of 10 million people. But they are megacities because their metropolitan populations are at least 10 million people. This is an internet encyclopedia so correct information must always be given. This needs to be changed in the article, which has been locked. 174.78.6.108 (talk) 18:49, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metropolitan Area, Not City 

message: In this phrase:
 three out of five, or sixty percent, of people
Please replace "sixty percent" with "60%".  Other spots in the same paragraph use "47%" and "90%", not "forty-seven percent" and "ninety percent". 123.51.107.94 (talk) 02:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! NotAGenious (talk) 15:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 February 2024
Talk:Sports car racing

message: Should event names like Le Mans 24 Hours, Targa Florio, etc. be italicized for readability? I'm not sure about the style rules for something like this, but it seems appropriate and looks better. Right now a lot of the events are linked multiple times, but they would look weird if the latter occurrences were unlinked.--Subversive Sound (talk) 01:43, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Event names

message: section needed to show differences in hp/engine to f1 race cars.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ericg33 (talk • contribs) 09:47, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  compare to f1 racing 

message: Can't find much mention of Clubman type sports cars, cars based on Lotus 7 and similar and modern iteration of such vehicles. While obviously not the subject of international attention these cars form the basis of entry level sports car racing the world over. Entry level racing deserves some attention, obviously not in the way of results, but to say it exists. Perhaps something that needs investigation? --Falcadore (talk) 06:42, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clubman sports cars 

message: This is really out of subject, and its include a link on a web site made to sell the gkw car.
"One interesting example of that Group C2 Racing Car is the GKW Prototype designed and built by the Italian Genius, Engineer and Racing Driver Gabriele Gottifredi. The GKW race car ran in the world championship 1988. The car was supposed to run at Le Mans, Fuji and 1988 Monza circuits, where it performed several tests but did not participate because it was under completion at the appointed date. After this the sponsors retired (due to lack of money) and the project was stopped. The car was in GKW workshop for more than 10 years before that an Italian gentleman drive purchase with all spares package. The new owner ordered a completely dismantling and parts renew to a very specialized shop: the full GKW Porsche Race Car GKW Group C2/GTP Porsche 956/962 Powered was completely re-worked, excluding engines." 74.15.201.74 (talk) 18:26, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: If the language was cleaned up the only possible place of addition would be on an article about the car itself, or its constructor, if the subject could meet notability. --Falcadore (talk) 01:28, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Car seller on wiki?
Talk:Origami

message: 2^N multiple tetrahedral family that can be folded on a single rectangle sheet 
Using a sheet of √1:√2 paper such as A4, you can fold a tetrahedron with four identical √3:√4 isosceles triangular faces into multiple pieces that are multiples of 2^N without cutting. Each of these tetrahedrons has four triangular paper faces, which do not overlap. That is, there are four times as many triangular faces as there are tetrahedra. In the case of a single sheet, groups of 2, 4, 8, and 16 tetrahedra of the same size are folded in various strange ways. Also, if you follow a certain rule (pattern), you can fold an infinite number of 2^N tetrahedra. 183.177.128.238 (talk) 05:20, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  multiple tetrahedral family that can be folded on a single A4 sheet 

message: في اي عام تصنع من صنعه 185.255.44.181 (talk) 11:07, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origami 

message: it mentions European traditions, but provides no source or further information. 64.110.254.75 (talk) 15:40, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Europe 

message: In the section on Tessellation, Alex Bateman's name is not linked to his article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Bateman Biroclouds (talk) 16:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Shadow311 (talk) 17:03, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 February 2024 

message: In season 1 episode 2 of the Netflix show Black Mirror, "Bing goes with Abi to the audition and she gives him an origami penguin." This simple gift is a powerful symbol - of creating something valuable and special to the character out of a piece of trash - in the story and I feel like this should be in the "in pop culture" section.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifteen_Million_Merits Jessefloria (talk) 00:38, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black Mirror episode 2 "15 Million Merits" Penguin origami
Talk:History of Canada

message: As I'm typing this, the article contains the sentence "France ceded nearly all its North American possessions to the United Kingdom in 1763 at the Treaty of Paris after the Seven Years' War". I don't think that's correct. I think France ceded these lands to GREAT BRITAIN in 1763. My belief is that the United Kingdom (of Great Britain and Ireland) didn't exist until the early 1800s.2600:1700:6759:B000:1C64:8308:33BC:E2D6 (talk) 19:07, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right, thanks for the heads up! I've made the necessary changes, but if you spot any additional errors, feel free to WP:BEBOLD and make the edit! Leventio (talk) 22:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: United Kingdom? Or Great Britain?
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Archive 1

message: Just a note about the Most Recent Addition heading: not only does it make it easy to get to the most recent addition via the ToC, but by editing that section and placing a new entry above the heading marker, it is appended to the previous section. Thus, at the end of the day, you can add a new item without having to scroll through all that day's items in that day's section. --Dante Alighieri 19:58, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most Recent Addition heading
Talk:Limerick (poetry)

message: I just noticed this and I was like hmmmmmm? Frittle (talk) 14:09, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I wondered where I'd dropped that. Fixed now. Cheers, BlackcurrantTea (talk) 19:36, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Frittle (talk) 13:38, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is there a " { " at the top of the talk page? 

message: The successive algebraic simplifications of the mathematical limerick is rather unencyclopedic, isn't it? The limerick stands well on it's own, and explicitly performing the calculations seems like WP:OR. —St.Nerol (talk, contribs) 13:14, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Algebra
Talk:Color blindness

message: As per the split made last year in this discussion, I am endeavouring to emphasize the distinction between colorblindness as a symptom, and any conditions that typically include colorblindness as a symptom (daltonism, acquired tritan, BCM, achromatopsia, etc.), most of which have their own article, and some of which have symptoms more severe than colorblindness. I'm going to make this distinction more clearly in the lede and throughout to hopefully avoid the newcomer editing that tends to link cvd to a specific condition. Just wanted to leave a paper trail here and give an ear for discussion if anyone cares. Curran919 (talk) 11:16, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  colorblindness as a symptom, not a condition
Talk:Seattle

message: The second paragraph under "Transportation" indicates that the 1 Line travels between Angle Lake and the University of Washington. A few paragraphs later it has the correct termini listed - so this is more about consistency.
Change to Angle Lake and Northgate (and then to Lynnwood, in Fall 2024). Scuplin (talk) 18:24, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It was clear enough to me what changes needed to be made, and I have done so. Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 04:49, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 December 2023 

message: *https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/data/seattle-is-the-least-religious-large-metro-area-in-the-u-s/
---Another Believer (Talk) 19:00, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: An interesting result, one which highlights the consistent differences between what people say on surveys, as reflected in our article (only 16% agnostic or atheist), and what they show through their behavior. Are you proposing that we add something to the article based on this source? I would support it. HiLo48 (talk) 22:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @HiLo48 I'm unable to view the article text, but certainly welcome any appropriate article improvements. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. HiLo48 (talk) 06:19, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion 

message: Sea 67.183.241.136 (talk) 18:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seattle Washington maps1984
Talk:Jimmy Shea

message: You mention in a summary that Jimmy Shea was not the first third generation Olympian. Who is the first  then? It should be included in the Jimmy Shea article as he was often reported as the first. Besides I'm curious.  --rmhermen
: You may find more of such 3G-Olympians at http://gallery.uunet.be/hermandw/olymp/families.html such as the Norwegian Lunde family, and the Bogen/Gerevich family. The feat is of course still quite remarkable. jheijmans
His comment isn't ironic, but I don't know how to word that better. Cs302b 15:03, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kahanism

message: I removed the fascism cat and bar as this is not supported by any sources - please introduce sources prior to introducing. I don't quite see academic sources defining them as such outright (I do see sources contrasting). Unlike Fascism, which is generally secular, Kahanism (to which one can tie many adjectives - ultra-nationalist, extreme far right, etc.) is rooted in hardcore religious fundamentalism (mirroring perhaps some Islamic fundamentalist groups). In any case - sources please. Icewhiz (talk) 05:25, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fascism 

message: Can we add these pertinent, basic principles to the lede?  Rabbi Meir Kahane (ordained Orthodox Rabbi) asserted "Kahanism" is merely Torah Judaism based on Halakha (Jewish Law, Torah Law), and proposed enforcing halakha as codified by Maimonides in Israel.  Here is a source, as well as a 'better source needed' in the bottom of the ideology section of the article.ShivatTzion (talk) 03:10, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of "Kahanism" is merely Torah Judaism based on Halakha (Jewish Law, Torah Law) 

message: I think the sentence about the US Classifying Kach as a terror organization should be removed, since that was revoked earlier this year. Mr manor11 (talk) 08:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be amended. It has been un-blacklisted because they have simply been inactive, but it remains a 'specially designated global terrorist' entity. Iskandar323 (talk) 08:51, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Iskandar323, IRL, I validate sanctions solutions providers to U.S. commercial and retail banks for AML/BSA and KYC compliance required by FinCEN & OFAC. Lists of SDFNs (specially designated foreign nationals) and entities that are deemed "terrorist organizations" can change often, and more so since sanctions on Russia as of 2022. State Dept. has a watchlist. Treasury has multiple watchlists. State and Treasury don't match 1:1 nor are they each unique. Anyway, entities (individuals and organizations) can be removed, or "un-blacklisted" from watchlists as appropriate by the US government, e.g. due to inactivity because all members are dead. Yet some old, inactive entities, e.g. Bader-Meinhoff group, Japanese sarin gas terrorists (forgot their name) are still on lists. How can an organization, e.g. Kach, remain a Specially Designated Terrorist group without remaining on the watchlist? Being an SDFN or SDT is what puts them on the watchlist, no?  If they are deemed inactive, then they would be removed, I would think. Can you or another editor explain?--FeralOink (talk) 06:34, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That is simply the state of affairs per US statements. See this article. Iskandar323 (talk) 06:59, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Iskandar323, I understand now, after re-reading my own comment! There are many idiosyncrasies in the U.S. terrorist watchlists. Thank you for providing that helpful link in your reply.--FeralOink (talk) 10:38, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrorist Organization
Talk:Marcus Manilius

message: This was found on the Manilius-page:
:If you are interested in Marcus Manilius, a Latin poet of the first century AD who wrote a long poem on Astrology, you can visit my site at http://manilio.f2g.net.
:There you will find a comprehensive list of bibliography, links and a forum where you can post questions relating to this poet or Astrology.
:Thank you very much.
:Martín Pozzi (mpozzi@myrealbox.com)
[[user:JeLuF|J? 
This article could be dispensed with, I think. What it says about Manilius is unnecessary in view of the Astronomica article, and what it says about Housman belongs, if anywhere, in the Housman article. Besides, it lacks citations, and is strangely written in places.Seadowns (talk) 10:58, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bede

message: World Almanac issues from the 1970s and 1980s state that the Venerable Bede announced in AD 730 that the year was too long (11 minutes 14 seconds excess - the actual year length being 365 days, 5 hours, 48 minutes, 46 seconds), though nothing was done about it until 1582, by which time the error was estimated to amount to 10 days.  There does not seem to be anything about it in the article. GBC (talk) 06:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length of the year 

message: I think the medieval depiction looks far worse than the modern one and is just not nearly as good for the first image people see, especially when both depictions are imaginary. Does anyone agree/disagree? SaturatedFatts (talk) 02:26, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the medieval one is fine, even though it's not contemporary.  It's probably not far from what a contemporary depiction would have been. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 03:28, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

text: I like the current picture. Which modern one do you mean? —DIYeditor (talk) 03:37, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This was the original lead image, which I moved further down in the article to the section on Bede's works. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 10:09, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New pic in infobox
Talk:Kazimierz Kuratowski

message: This whole section needs to be rewritten. For one, it is barely chronological. Angry bee (talk) 06:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ay, you're right, it's a complete mess. Volunteer Marek  20:41, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography 

message: From the article, 
"...His contributions to mathematics include:...
identification of the ordered pair (x,y) with the set {{x},{x,y}};"
That may be true, but I've heard Norbert Weiner did something with that as well.24.7.28.186 (talk) 20:29, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, in fact that's what Wiener article explains, and that Kuratowski put it into its present form.24.7.28.186 (talk) 20:41, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: contibutions section

message: I found the title and volume/date/journal for Kuratowski's 1920 article about finite sets in parentheses just after the sentence about "an axiomatic construction of topology via the closure axioms". However, this article has nothing at all on this subject. This 1920 article only introduces the Kuratowski finiteness definition and shows that it is equivalent to the standard numerical definition of finiteness. It's only 2 pages and 7 lines long, and it's about set theory only.
I have added a bibliographic reference for this significant article. However, it is not connected with the topology at all. So maybe someone who knows about Kuratowski's topology contributions could fix that up. I think the 1920 paper should remain in the bibliography on this page, but not at that location in the article.
--Alan U. Kennington (talk) 10:23, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  1920 article is not about topology
Talk:Normal space

message: Are perfectly normal (Hausdorff) spaces also called T6? The taxobox certainly implies so; I haven't seen this, but it would make perfect sense. If so, then this fact should be added to Separation axiom and (at the very least!) here. —Toby Bartels 09:32, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Encyclopedia of General Topology (2004, ed. Hart, Nagata, and Vaughan) defines T6 spaces as perfectly normal Hausdorff spaces (p. 158). I'll add this terminology to the article since it fits in nicely with the other Ti axioms. -- Fropuff 19:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

text: FWIW: Munkres also refers to perfectly normal Hausdorff spaces as T6. -- Fropuff 06:09, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  T<sub>6</sub>