Talk:Gender apartheid

message: This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Rice University supported by  the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2013 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.Category:Wikipedia Ambassador Program student projects, 2013 Q1
===Iran===
doesn't Iran have a long history of educating women and isn't it a moderate islamic state in terms of it's general treatment of women.  I'm not sure it deserves to be singled out here (how many female presidents in the US?) Will TALK 02:36, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Ambassador Program assignment 

message: doesn't Iran have a long history of educating women and isn't it a moderate islamic state in terms of it's general treatment of women.  I'm not sure it deserves to be singled out here (how many female presidents in the US?) Will TALK 02:36, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Iran

message:  
SlimVirgin (talk) 01:13, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfM 

message: Is there any opposition to merging Islamic apartheid into this article?Homey 23:45, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging Islamic apartheid

message: I see at this search gender apartheid has been described as pejorative in four articles (til it was removed here), even though none of these articles has a source that specifically calls it that.  Obviously, since apartheid is not seen as a good thing by most people, it is pejorative. Should Wikipedia describe it as such. I'm not sure myself, but the policy should be same for all articles that use the phrase. (And some of them seem redundant, but another issue for another time.) CarolMooreDC (talk) 20:15, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think yes, because "gender apartheid" is not such a common term, and less pejorative near-equivalents such as sex segregation are in common use. In any use of the word not corresponding to the crime of apartheid, "apartheid" is a derogatory epithet, much like "fascist" or "dictator". Quigley (talk) 20:24, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Pejorative term"

message: Hi Joyce! This is a really good article and I enjoyed reading it. However, I think you should definitely find more scholarly resources to give the article more credibility. Also, do you know if there has been any research done on this by international organizations and possible policy suggestions. Furthermore, you put some legislation in the sections about the U.S. and Saudi Arabia, but do you know if other countries have put similar legislation in place? I think those things would be interesting to incorporate. Other than that, I really don't have many more suggestions for you. Good job! Lgriffin92 (talk) 22:46, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Lgriffin92, thanks for very helpful suggestions! As I continue to edit the article, I will definitely look into finding more scholarly sources. As for more examples of legislation that perpetuates gender apartheid, I will certainly look for more evidence in other countries to add to the individual case studies. Thanks again for the great advice! JoyceChou (talk) 01:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Review

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Gender apartheid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130225160659/http://www.phyllis-chesler.com/984/phyllis-chesler-on-islamic-gender-apartheid to http://www.phyllis-chesler.com/984/phyllis-chesler-on-islamic-gender-apartheid
*Added  tag to http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/country,,IRBC,,PAK,,4784def9c,0.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081011215511/http://www.bridgew.edu/SoAS/jiws/Nov05V2/Imran.pdf to http://www.bridgew.edu/soas/jiws/nov05v2/imran.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131127152700/http://nowomennoplay.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=20&Itemid=2 to http://nowomennoplay.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=20&Itemid=2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:39, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Gender apartheid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051217100322/http://www.law-lib.utoronto.ca/DIANA/afghanwomen.htm to http://www.law-lib.utoronto.ca/Diana/afghanwomen.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050315083110/http://www.womensenews.org/article.cfm/dyn/aid/2212/context/ourdailylives to http://www.womensenews.org/article.cfm/dyn/aid/2212/context/ourdailylives
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:40, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gender apartheid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151017194849/http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a2FgNX4Q1GeE&refer=uk to https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a2FgNX4Q1GeE&refer=uk
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello, in this edit I desired to write the word "paedophile" instead of where I placed [child] in brackets. However, the edit-filter disallowed my edit entirely. In order to conform with the quoted source, I feel the correct word should be used. 2600:8800:1880:91E:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26 (talk) 20:16, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be incorrect, as it's not called "paedophile pornography".—Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 15:53, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit disallowed by filter 

message: Because I think it's too controversial for me to just plonk in a short description straightaway, I would like to carry this discussion here. I am proposing to add a short description for this page. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:54, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of short description