lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Solar System

message: Objects within, and history topics related to the Solar System.
:there really needs to be a clear(er) definition for the topic now that subtopics are on their way — thus allowing for the topic to be more focused Nergaal (talk) 23:39, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Working definition

message: :I think for the sake of cleanness we should use this section as the talkpage.
Is anybody still interested in these (sub)topics? Nergaal (talk) 22:43, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The ice giants interest me, but I'm not sure I have time for them now. Double sharp (talk) 13:32, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, here is some serious thought about my dear Uranus and Neptune. For Uranus the needed articles are Miranda (which should be something like Ariel and I think we could get Serendipodous involved as noted on the talk page), the atmosphere and the climate (both look fairly good and atmosphere of Uranus is already at GAN – though there may be new stuff that was found between 2011 and 2017, which I shall have to go and check), and the exploration. For Neptune, it is the discovery (a field day for POV-pushers, I would imagine), the trojans (shouldn't be too different from the Jupiter trojans, except the less is known), and the exploration. I think I'll go for Uranus first, as there seems to be some activity there already. Double sharp (talk) 14:38, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussions

message: One of the articles within this featured topic is currently undergoing a featured article review. Some help is needed for this article to retain its status. Anybody here still? Femke Nijsse (talk) 12:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAR of Earth 

message: Per the promotion of Wikipedia:Featured topics/Dwarf planets, this topic should probably be edited to present that template in a similar manner to the Jupiter and Asteroid belt subtopics. It is already listed as an "Established subtopic" above. Mockup below:
CMD (talk) 04:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Change made following short discussion at Wikipedia talk:Featured topics. CMD (talk) 07:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dwarf planet subtopic
Talk:Trichocyst

message: defensive mechanisms
71.184.152.228 10:54, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

message: This article contains verbatim text from current edition of Encyclopaedia Britannica. Text is "Toxicysts (in Dileptus and certain other carnivorous protozoans) tend to be localized around the mouth. When discharged, a toxicyst expels a long, nonstriated filament with a rodlike tip, which paralyzes or kills other microorganisms; this filament is used to capture food and, presumably, in defense." There's no article for the subject in 12th ed. EB. I know this happens, but haven't come across it before. What is the appropriate course of action? Prime Lemur (talk) 01:25, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current ed. E. Britannica text
Talk:Jdbgmgr.exe virus hoax

message: It might be worth noting what effects deleting the file had on one's computer.
Is the file even important enough to cause any instability/damage?
Yeah, that's what I want to know too. MalwareSmarts 14:40, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Going to add something. Halsteadk 20:00, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Effects

message: A small detail, but I think it would be better if the icon showed the name "jdbgmgr.exe" as this article specifically relates to that usage of this icon. Halsteadk 20:00, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Icon

message: Does anyone know why this is marked as malware related? It was just a virus hoax, it's just the Debug Manager in Windows OS's --TheAnonymousGamer (talk) 13:05, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Malware-related?
Talk:Camden Park, New South Wales

message: Given that there is a growing suburb of Camden Park, I think this page should be renamed Camden Park Estate, New South Wales or something similar so that Camden Park, New South Wales can be reassigned to the suburb. I await other people's thoughts.
Forgot to add a signature Crico 21:22, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Except, since 'Camden Park' is the name of the estate, and has been for 200 years, it could be argued that 'Camden Park suburb' should be the option for the latter? Thoughts? cheers, (Scott E Hill (talk) 07:55, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming article
Talk:Nevada State Route 651

message: SR 651 and SR 650 does not exist any more. Now all of McCarran Boulevard is now is part of SR 659. I have no sources at this time for it, but this is true. -Kluft (talk) 22:30, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Currently the only evidence of this is that all SR 650/651 mileposts have been replaced with new SR 659 mileposts. The 650/651 articles can't be rewritten/merged until a source (i.e. the next NDOT route log) is published. --LJ (talk) 21:28, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: All relevant content has been merged into Nevada State Route 659. -- LJ ↗ 09:46, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  SR 651 decommissioned
Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Star Wars episodes

message: The working definition is, "films in the Star Wars series".--Pharos 02:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Working definition

message: This topic satisfies current criteria just fine. -- igordebraga ≠ 22:57, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's still probably a not a good idea to split this in two (making Star Wars GA is probably easier than making both the original trilogy and the prequel trilogy GA), but I was probably overinterpreting a requirement for 3 FAs.  Anyway, I think it might be a good idea to just designate Star Wars the lead immediately, so at least it's in the standard format, even if it isn't meeting criteria yet; is there any problem with this?--Pharos 06:09, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The last time we tried that it failed, but if you want to give it another go, you'll have my support.  It might pass if we try nominating it while specifically saying in the nomination that the topic is on provisional status anyway.  --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 06:47, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd support doing so too because it would make people more likely to improve Star Wars if they see it needs improving. — Pious7 13:46, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Definitely agree that this needs a proper Main articles ASAP. Circeus 18:42, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, following a disgraceful FAR for Episode III, it needs to reach GA/FA level again. igordebraga ≠ 16:25, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

text: This one will be tougher than the Zelda one, but I'll still get there. Gary King (talk) 03:18, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vital improvements

message: Of course it would also be nice if Return of the Jedi was brought up to FA to complete the set.--Pharos 02:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Four other articles could also reach Featured status: Star Wars (GA), and the entirety of the prequel trilogy (GAs and former FAs, demoted after three disgraceful FARs) igordebraga ≠ 02:05, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential improvements

message: It is possible that articles on some characters, etc. could be added to this topic in future.--Pharos 02:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How about the two trilogy articles, or stuff from :Category:Lists of Star Wars characters? Circeus 18:38, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible additions
Talk:Walk, Don't Run (instrumental)

message: Skate punk band JFA also did a cover (Album: Valley of the Yakes).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.222.128.152 (talk) 08:12, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  JFA 

message: It's not a song, it's an instrumental.  Shouldn't the title be changed accordingly?  Kostaki mou (talk) 19:27, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the move, but Instrumental should be all lower case: Walk, Don't Run (instrumental). A technical move is needed. Rothorpe (talk) 03:38, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇  18:29, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Walk, Don't Run (song)
Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/The Simpsons (season 8)

message: The working definition is, "the episodes of season 8 of the Simpsons".--Pharos 02:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Working definition

message: This topic satisfies current criteria just fine.--Pharos 02:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the ones that are easiest to expand are the ones with obvious external references: The Springfield Files, Brother from Another Series, and Simpsoncalifragilisticexpiala(Annoyed Grunt)cious, and ones with messages: Homer vs. The Eighteenth Amendment and In Marge We Trust.  --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 00:34, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vital improvements

message: Per above comment by , 2 more FAs are needed to maintain WP:FT status on this topic.  FA potential candidates?  Please list below.  Cirt (talk) 22:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the ones that are easiest to expand are the ones with obvious external references: The Springfield Files, Brother from Another Series, and Simpsoncalifragilisticexpiala(Annoyed Grunt)cious, and ones with messages: Homer vs. The Eighteenth Amendment and In Marge We Trust.  --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 00:34, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: FA potentials

message: It would be nice is some more of the episodes could be promoted to FA.--Pharos 02:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The closest right now would be You Only Move Twice which has undergone a peer review, but not much has been done to improve the page lately. -- Scorpion0422 02:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential improvements

message: I do not believe any additions to this topic would be possible.--Pharos 02:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible additions

message: For those interested, there is currently a drive to get The Simpsons (season 1) to FT status. It is similar to the drive that got season 8 featured. The project page can be viewed here, although most involved are burnt out from working on season 8 and not much has been done recently. -- Scorpion0422 02:47, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note
Talk:Detleff Neumann-Neurode

message: These are apparently his publications. If someone involved in this topic area could verify, format, and add, it would be much appreciated. Daniel 05:16, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are many more than that: see this link to the German National Library (link currently given in the German Wikipedia article) – Fayenatic (talk) 21:18, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Publications

message: Someone claiming to be the subject's granddaughter added this:
: Dr.Reinhard Ganz has currently finished a dissertation about D.Neumann-Neurode. He is reachable at [digits] Wehr, Germany
I've removed that and redacted what appears to be a telephone number; even if Doctor Ganz authorized publishing the number, he may well come to regret it.
The bare datum that someone has written about DNN is far less helpful than the title of the dissertation and for what publication or institution it was written. —Tamfang (talk) 01:19, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ganz thesis
Talk:Laura Ingalls (aviator)

message: Laura Ingalls wasn't an "accused spy." She was a *convicted* spy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.207.250.11 (talk) 18:25, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the "Timeline" section it says she was born in 1903.  Everywhere else in the article it says 1893. — Entrybreak (talk) 23:22, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of Birth

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — mw (talk) (contribs) 19:26, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Laura Ingalls (aviator) →  – Sole such Wikipedia main title header, thus obviating need for the parenthetical qualifier "(aviator)". As for the writer whose birth name was "Laura Ingalls", her WP:COMMONNAME, from her marriage at age 18 until her death at age 90, has been Laura Ingalls Wilder, not simply "Laura Ingalls". A hatnote atop the aviator's entry pointing to the writer should suffice. Paired with this nomination, there is also no need for the Laura Ingalls (disambiguation) page which can be nominated for deletion at WP:AfD. Related arguments from seven years ago which may be interpreted as supporting or opposing elements within this nomination can be consulted at Talk:Laura Ingalls (disambiguation)#Requested move 28 November 2016, submitted by Neveselbert. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 17:19, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 November 2023
Talk:Harper Valley PTA

message: I wonder if anyone can find a published source to cite for this ... I saw a PBS special once on women in country music, and Jeannie Riley told a story about an awards show in which she was nominated. Her record company had insisted that she wear a mini-skirt for the many promotional events related to PR for the song, and as the awards show approached, she was excited about the chance finally to wear an elegant, long gown as was her preference. She went out and bought a pricy gown, only to find that at the last minute, people from the record company took it upon themselves to cut the gown's skirt short to make a mini-skirt of it. This would be an interesting anecdote to add to the article, but I'm not sure where to find a reliable source to cite. Lawikitejana (talk) 05:44, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Jeannie Riley, awards, and miniskirts

message: Who in their wisdom wrote the line about this song having the same melody as "Ode To Billy Joe?" This is simply not true, and not only that but the assertion isn't backed up with any reference. If you only hum the two songs in your head you'll note they have nether the same key, tempo, chord progression nor melody; with "Ode" having a minor bluesy feel, but "Harper" is breezy and pop-ish in its feel, resolving stanzas in key. Story telling is perhaps the only similarity. Come to WP with some facts before making these statements. I'm going to flag the sentence but not erase it.   2602:306:320A:AF0:4492:6025:4438:A489 (talk) 02:55, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Melody? 

message: Added copyright info to article, which focuses heavily on the song writing
Harper Valley PTA (Later That Same Day); 
w & m Tom T. Hall, 1 p. Appl states
prev. reg. 26Dec67, no.30104. NM; new lyrics. 
© Newkeys Music, Inc.; 280ct68; EU80542. 
Date of publication as given in the application
NM= new matter
p= page(s)
https://archive.org/details/catalogofco1968322512libr
Tillywilly17 (talk) 01:07, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyright info
Talk:Mohammed Ebrahim Hajeyah

message: The article has been stubbified because most of it was incomprehensible. The deleted information is retained in the article's history report (also available here). Feel free to re-insert the information, but please ensure that it is appropriately copy-edited first. Cheers. – Liveste 02:54, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stubbification
Talk:Have You Seen Her

message: An infobox for the MC Hammer version of "Have You Seen Her" was requested at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Missing_encyclopedic_articles/List_of_notable_songs/6.
:Now done.
:Derek R Bullamore (talk) 08:00, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

message: The song title is always rendered as "Have you seen her", whereas one might expect it to be "Have you seen her?". Does anybody know why the question mark is missing?  BealBocht (talk) 16:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I think it may have been a decision by the record company, rather than by the writers Eugene Record and Barbara Acklin. As you can see form the image in the infobox, it's not on the single cover. It's also not used on the Chi-lites official website and it wasn't used on the single's label. From a practical view point, I guess the question mark doesn't change the meaning, does it? Martinevans123 (talk) 17:01, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is there no question mark after the title?
Talk:Mattress protector

message: Underpad is a term used and they are out there, just check google. Merge them maybe? --Seth slackware 02:53, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Underpad

message: Aren't protectors and toppers different things? Protectors are to stop the mattress getting fouled, while toppers are to improve the level of comfort provided by the mattress, or to extend the life of an old mattress by a couple of years. --Ef80 (talk) 15:55, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology
Talk:Keynesian formula

message: I've proposed that this be merged into Aggregate demand but since most of the info's already there it may be better just to redirect it.
There's no sources provided refer to Y=C+I+G+X as "The Keynesian formula" though one could probably be dug up somewhere given how much has been written on this. But it's not standard. Most formulations of "The Keynesian formula" refer to the Keynesian policy prescription of boosting AD during recessions (for example, Galbraith uses it in that sense).radek (talk) 01:58, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirect sounds fine to me, but given what you say would it be better to redirect to Keynesian_economics or even Keynesian_economics#Active_fiscal_policy rather than Aggregate demand? CRETOG8(t/c) 03:18, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

text: I support merging (or just redirecting to Aggregate Demand).--Bkwillwm (talk) 04:03, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

text: I'm redirecting to aggregate demand. The same topic is covered in aggregate demand. The use of the term "keynesian formula" to refer to C + I + G + X - M = GDP, has not been used for the last twenty years. See this google scholar search. LK (talk) 06:33, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge or redirect
Talk:Iskolat

message: This article confused the history somewhat. Pēteris Stučka was later. `'юзырь:mikka 03:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Although your edit is correct, the statement that Stučka "was later" is not entirely true. He had been uncontested leader of the Bolshevik wing of the Social Democracy of Latvia (LSD; a territorial subdivision of the RSDSP) since the 1914 party congress. His leadership was very much in evidence during the Iskolat period, when he very nearly became mayor of Riga. — Zalktis 07:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "but historian Andrew Ezergailis has shown that autonomy or independence for the "Iskolat Republic" was never the goal for the Latvian Bolsheviks, who were led by the federalist ideologue Pēteris Stučka",what was their purpose then? Цйфыву (talk) 20:54, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewritten
Talk:The Misadventures of Sheriff Lobo

message: > What differentiated the half hour episodes from the hour long episodes had a laugh track.
This sentence doesn't even make any sense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.180.44.133 (talk) 05:52, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Come Again? 

message: Bring back Sheriff Lobo...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.226.142.213 (talk) 21:49, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lobo... Lobo...
Talk:Mark Gorski

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  —fetch·comms 12:55, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Mercy Home for Boys and Girls

message: While this is certainly a much higher cause than that advanced by most NPOV articles on Wikipedia, it still reads like an advertisement rather than like a neutral collection of facts. If you know the place, please help making the article better. -- 217.190.223.174 (talk) 11:51, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to prune back the ad-style wording. 50.141.191.220 (talk) 14:42, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Tried to include as much information as I could find quickly.
Joehallissey (talk) 22:46, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added infobox
Talk:Michael Wright (basketball)

message: Children= Daisha Wright  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SARATYPES12345354321 (talk • contribs) 01:50, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Ghum, West Bengal

message: Nepali is not normally spoken in Ghum. Can you provide a reliable citation that would support your edit? Bladesmulti (talk) 05:16, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Languages 
Talk:Northwestern University Law Review

message: Not notable on its own merits.  Most of the article is promotional material Rogermx (talk) 18:28, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 07:29, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy]]
Talk:Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam/Archive 7

message: Cud someone please add the fact that LTTE now has air power. LTTE has recently acquired two light aircrafts and bombed Srilankan air base near Colombo on 27 mar 2007
-news by Reuters. This being my first post on wiki and all, i dont really know what are rules to add these things. 
here is the link: http://www.indianexpress.com/story/26768.html —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Doped k9 (talk • contribs) 04:39, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tamil air power 

message: Maybe I missed it, but what does the LTTE stand for? Are they communist, nationalist, Catholic, leftist, etc? If they specifically don't take stances on such things and only say they are for the liberation of the Tamil people, I think that should be mentioned.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.213.150.109 (talk • contribs) 
:According to the infobox, they're Tamil nationalists. --Hojimachongtalk 23:08, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Politics?

message: A new link added to the article , with the same story:
:But a Humberside police spokesman said: "Our evidence does not suggest there is a definite link with Sri Lankan gangs."
So there is a scam in Britain, which one of the parties in the conflict in Sri Lanka want to place on the other party - but that the local police says can not be proved. Why should we have such a link in the article about LTTE? And still the SVIK link is in the article - a link to a one man organisation. What about reliable sources? Ulflarsen 19:55, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New link - same story
Talk:Paul Van Riper (political scientist)

message: You are invited to participate in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Van Riper to discuss proposed changes to the disambiguation arrangements between Paul P. Van Riper and Paul K. Van Riper. Deryck C. 17:34, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Van Riper]] 
Talk:Respite (law)

message: I cannot speak for the previous page, but this one has clearly moved beyond a mere dictionary entry. PSRuckman 03:35, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added the globalize tag to the article since it only addresses US law.  Should it instead be renamed to Respite (US law)? RJFJR (talk) 16:19, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize