Talk:Shrek Forever After

message: BigBang616, please do not use abbreviations on Wikipedia. (you used aka) Wikipedia is a factual website, not a chat zone. Thanks, Monkeys 9711 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monkeys 9711 (talk • contribs) 21:04, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Don't use abbreviations

message: Who put up Shrek 5 on the Infobox? There is not even proof of it.
:It was recently changed. Thanks for the correction. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 12:17, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to change it back. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 23:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shrek 5?

message: I'd like to recommend that this article is merged and redirected to Shrek (series) because there is very little context to substantiate an entire article at the present.  References about the beginnings of development can be placed there instead. —Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 23:24, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm fine with that.  My reasoning for removing the CSD tag was that none of the arguments for deletion still apply to this version of the article.  WP is not a crystal ball doesn't really apply because it has been announced by the studio.  Although, I am fine with another AfD nomination and I fully support a redirect to Shrek (series).  --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 23:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, it's just that articles that are underdeveloped tend to attract a lot of unsubstantiated rumors, so from what I've seen, housing content such as the announcement of development under a fuller article helps preserve encyclopedic integrity.  Let's just say you should've seen The Dark Knight back in its first days... —Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 23:30, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree that there should be some merging of the Shrek information.  The original Shrek page, for example, contains all the sequel information.  Duplicating the sequel information on each individual Shrek # page is redundant and can lead to citation and editing errors/mistakes/lack of updates/etc. SpikeJones 15:29, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to [[Shrek (series)]]

message: I changed the 2-D in the whole, "it's gonna be 3-D" to "regular" because saying 2-D will lead people to believe that we mean like a regular cartoon (17:05, 20 May 2007) 71.225.206.193
:We need to be sure to clarify in the text somehow that Dreamworks' announcement was that the 3D releases would be "in addition" to the standard format releases, not a substitue/replacement. SpikeJones 02:39, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 3-D

message: Change the title Shrek 4 to Shrek: Ever After
The NY licensing show was today and we now have the title - Shrek: Ever After. Here is the poster:
http://picsmcgee.com/albums/Licensing%202007/normal_IMG_0228.jpg75.75.76.110 21:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As I've just gone around and corrected, that is NOT the title of the movie. fethers 04:05, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The poster is in fact a promotional poster created for Shrek the Third. — MovieJunkie Talk! 14:17, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shrek: Ever After 

message: For now I'm letting the cast stay because they are probably legit, but if theres no reference by tomorrow they'll be removed. — MovieJunkie Talk! 19:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone and taking some time in finding some references... I knew there would be some around. If however I hadn't been bothered, I would have merely deleted the section. In future, can we please add references, or not bother in the first place! — MovieJunkie Talk!
19:21, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Anyone got any info on the video game version of Shrek goes Fourth? If anyone has got any info on that please give us a bell. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 15:56, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I have found a link on IGN with infomation on video game ports of Shrek goes Fourth. Should I include it in the article? mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 15:15, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Breaking News on Shrek goes Fourth video game ports

message: After the Monty Python references of Shrek the Third, are the Shrek team now referencing the comedy series Blackadder? The third season was called "Blackadder the Third", and the fourth season was "Blackadder Goes Forth". 80.4.202.8 (talk) 22:43, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Gonna have to look that one up. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 16:19, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Those that count as copyright fraud? Would adding that to the article be notable to the article? mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

text: No joy on wether or not Shrek using the exact same naming convention as  Blackadder for all four films is copyright fraud? Give us a bell asap If anyone's got any. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 16:08, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: (a) to be added to the article, you will need to find a citable reference per WP:CITE that shows the Shrek's titles AREe influenced by Blackadder. (b) if shown to be a direct influence, it would be parody, not fraud, and therefore not even likely to be included in the first place. SpikeJones (talk) 17:18, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

text: Ok will do in acordince with  WP:CITE. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 19:34, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blackadder? 

message: I thought there was a 5th film in development as well  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.90.165.17 (talk) 21:20, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  final film????? 

message: In particular the last few sentences sentences:
Now, If Shrek shares true loves kiss by sunrise, everything will return to normal! But now, Rumplestiltskin has sent out an army of witches to stop him. Now Shrek must stop Rumplestiltskin and return everything to normal. But can he?
read like promotional material. Mitch Ames (talk) 09:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed now.. Mitch Ames (talk) 09:45, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot section's tone or style may not be appropriate for Wikipedia 

message: If the film isn't out for another month, how does it have such a detailed plot section?  —Mike Allen 06:02, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot section, already? 

message: Editors recently have been modifying the article to show the film's apparent new title, Shrek: The Final Chapter. I looked at the official site, and it does appear that Dreamworks has indeed changed the title. Sounds like a move request is in order.  --McDoobAU93 (talk) 18:16, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Support.  Makes sense although kind of a strange move to change the title so close to release. Hopefully they have made up their mind now (I see there's quite a few titles already). Mike Allen 23:01, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move the article 

message: However, we may not necessarily need to update the poster again. --Addict 2006 18:17, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another poster just came out 

message: According to the article, "This film received negative reviews so far on Rotten Tomatoes. It currently has 20% and a score of 4.7/10 based on five reviews."
However, the film is not scheduled to be released for two weeks. Is there an explanation?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.181.67.130 (talk) 15:26, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: some people get to see it early. riffic (talk) 07:45, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception from the Future? 

message: The title of the page is "Shrek Forever After", but in posters and in many commercials the title varies as either "Shrek Forever After" OR "Shrek The Final Chapter 3D", perhaps there should be a part of the article that mentions this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.41.233.12 (talk) 05:44, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree... It looks somewhat silly to have in bold "Shrek Forever After", and then have the poster image in the infobox reading a totally different name. 24.181.42.69 (talk) 01:02, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: See the discussion above. 98.198.83.12 (talk) 09:01, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Titles 

message: What is the official title for Shrek 4? I know it was either Shrek Forever After or Shrek: The Final Chapter, but there can only be ONE title for the opening credits, right? What was the title of the film(as appeared in the film in the opening credits)?  --75.91.5.34 (talk) 03:39, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently Shrek Forever After. Mike Allen 04:27, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official Title 

message: Yes, I know marketing has implied this will be the final film. However, as outlined in the "Possible sequel" section, well... a sequel is possible. As a result, this repeated, unsourced claim is inappropriate. - SummerPhDv2.0 04:07, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:22, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final film? Not definitive. 

message: An IP editor recently removed Pacific Data Images from the list of production companies without using an edit summary.  I hate when IP editors do this, because I never know what they're thinking, and it forces me to look up information on Google to see if it belongs there.  I was going to let the IP editor's edit stand, actually.  According to the Variety review, it was produced by DreamWorks Animation.  I don't see any mention of PDI here.  Same in this review by The Hollywood Reporter, though they identify InTru3D as a production company.  Our article on InTru3D doesn't make them sound like a production company, though.  So, I'm not sure where this is coming from, except the IMDb, which, of course, is not a reliable source. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:14, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pacific Data Images 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Shrek Forever After. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
* Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110313051631/http://ir.dreamworksanimation.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=555383 to http://ir.dreamworksanimation.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=555383
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:11, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved, early close per WP:SNOW. — JFG talk 22:30, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Shrek Forever After →  You forgot to add a colon. 31.52.4.146 (talk) 12:55, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Shrek Forever After. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
* Corrected formatting/usage for http://ir.dreamworksanimation.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=540593
* Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110920190709/http://www.thehothits.com/news/19942/nickelodeon-kids%27-choice-awards-nominations---australia-2010%21 to http://www.thehothits.com/news/19942/nickelodeon-kids'-choice-awards-nominations---australia-2010!
* Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111216232924/http://annieawards.org/legacy38th.html to http://annieawards.org/legacy38th.html
* Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120322071437/http://blog.zap2it.com/pop2it/2011/02/kids-choice-awards-2011-nominees-miley-cyrus-justin-bieber-and-selena-gomez-lead.html to http://blog.zap2it.com/pop2it/2011/02/kids-choice-awards-2011-nominees-miley-cyrus-justin-bieber-and-selena-gomez-lead.html
* Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110430224049/http://scifimafia.com/2011/02/37th-annual-saturn-award-nominations/ to http://scifimafia.com/2011/02/37th-annual-saturn-award-nominations/
* Corrected formatting/usage for http://ir.dreamworksanimation.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=555383
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:57, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: For those interested, please share your feedback at WT:Manual of Style/Film#Categories: Films about foo, which is discussing whether or not this film should be a member of two Wikipedia categories: "" and "". Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 03:55, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category assessment 

message: , it is time to stop the disruptive editing. Your edit isn't sticking, because it is not seen as an improvement. You are expected to discuss this issue here. Explain your viewpoint. -- GoneIn60 (talk) 16:11, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary 

message: A future sequel, Shrek 5, is currently in development. 2001:48F8:300B:3DB:E515:EE15:A71A:44E1 (talk) 03:45, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes; there's an entire section about that. DonIago (talk) 04:14, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shrek 5 in development 

message: Why didn't PDI make this film if this company was still alive & the first three films were produced by that company?
@ Evope (talk) 19:49, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  PDI