Talk:Hadith of the pond of Khumm

message: Added a few words about the rather meager non-muslim contribution to this argument.  DKleinecke (talk) 21:33, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

message: was that it fails for lack of an active discussion.  -- Yellowdesk (talk) 12:39, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I think The Farewell Pilgrimage would better stand alone! I see no reason to merge these two articles. Mhhossein (talk) 08:59, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Nimbosa, the merge nominator, please say  your reasons for merging these pages. Mhhossein, I agree with you. Sa.vakilian, what's your opinion?Saff V. (talk) 09:35, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Wikipedia is being used by some people to push their political views and they remove every one else's views and references.
Wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopedia 
If you want to debate issues or push political views please use other forums
There are three different versions of this Hadith and one version says that Muhammad only left the Quran according to Muslim 15/19, nu 1218; ibn Majah 25/84, Abu dawud 11/56
Other like Muwatta (46.3) by Malik ibn Anas, the oldest book in Islam after the Quran. 
refer to just 
 Book of Allah and the Sunna 
It will be best if this page is totally removed.
Then according to the Quran, no race is above another race. Racial inequality is not acceptable according to the Quran. 
Quran, Surat Al-Hujurat [49:13]:Surat Al-Hujurat 49:13
"O mankind, indeed I have created you from male and female and made you peoples and tribes that you may know one another. Indeed, the most noble of you in the sight of Allah is the most righteous of you. Indeed, Allah is Knowing and Acquainted"
Surat An-Nisa' 4:1
 Leo1pard (talk) 13:21, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political views 

message: The article was written with a clear Shi'a bias.  In fact, the Sunni position was stated by referring to a Shi'a website, namely Al-Islam.org which contains a polemical diatribe about how the Shi'a position can be proved from Sunni sources.  Of course, the Sunnis reject these claims and believe that the Shi'a are taking the Sunni texts out of context and/or citing unauthentic sources.  I, as a neutral party, agree that the Shi'as should share their viewpoint but they should not define the Sunni position for the Sunnis.
On the other hand, the Shi'a position was not clearly established in the sense that the full text of the Shi'a version was not given.  So much time was taken refuting the Sunni stance that the Shi'a stance was not fully elaborated upon.  Therefore, the article did not do justice for either side.
The article has been corrected and turned neutral by establishing both positions.  I strongly urge both Sunnis and Shi'as to refrain from turning this into a debate.  It is not a debate, but rather it is an article.  Simply provide the viewpoint of each side, but there is no need to "refute" the other stance, as this is not a polemical website.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.3.130.17 (talk) 14:19, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article has been returned to a neutral point of view

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:46, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Ali callig.gif Nominated for Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hadith of the pond of Khumm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927184708/http://www.najaf.org/english/book/12/ to http://www.najaf.org/english/book/12/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:01, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Leo1pard (talk) 13:20, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page views 

message: Please see this. Leo1pard (talk) 13:20, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge ''Hadith of the pond of Khumm'' into ''[[The event of Ghadir Khumm]]''?