Talk:CD36

message: This is a very technical article with no references.  It looks like it is either a copyright violation (it was uploaded anonymously), but I can find no matching source documents (there are copyright violatins the other way!), or it would seem to me to be an original paper. --David Woolley 11:01, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: At least one academic article (full text here) seems to back up what the article indicates.  It is not my field of expertise, however, so I can't say much beyond that. --Hansnesse 21:16, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Most of this is drawn from published work which is in the public domain. I will be adding references where appropriate as fast as i can. V-man 06:17, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research

message: As well as no references, there are no subpheadings. --David Woolley 11:01, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Working on a cleanup now. Stay tuned.V-man 06:18, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: According to my knowledge, CD36 is not expressed on adult erythrocytes, as is mentioned in the article. It is however expressed on adult erythroid cells as they differentiate from mature BFU-E to reticulocytes [1,2] (and probably on 10-20% of fetal erythrocytes [1]).
Literature:
1.
Edelman, P, et al., A monoclonal antibody against an erythrocyte ontogenic antigen identifies fetal and adult erythroid progenitors. Blood, 1986. 67(1): p. 56-63.
Link:
http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/vol67/issue1/ or http://www.bloodjournal.org/cgi/reprint/67/1/56
2.
Greenwalt, D.E., et al., Membrane Glycoprotein-Cd36 - a Review of Its Roles in Adherence, Signal Transduction, and Transfusion Medicine. Blood, 1992. 80(5): p. 1105-1115.
Link:
http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/vol80/issue5/ or http://www.bloodjournal.org/cgi/reprint/80/5/1105
--Danielremmers 13:49, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Those are some spcific but older references. They seem to contradict the malaria literature. I.E. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=2473841&query_hl=14&itool=pubmed_docsumV-man 21:41, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  CD36 expression 

message: Elucidation of CD36's relationship to obesity was needed with reference to current literature. Minor clarification to CD36's role in blood pressure was called for as well.
Pjuviler (talk) 10:21, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: CD36 clinical significance

message: Should mention , . - Rod57 (talk) 12:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Please stop suggesting that people add content that is WP:Biomedical information sourced to non-MEDRS sources like this.  This is hyped basic research that comes around every few years.  We are not part of the hype cycle. Jytdog (talk) 20:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  CD36 Involved in metastasis 

message: Copy refs from intro to detail sections, describe ligand binding mechanism (what it is specific to), More on the internalisation, what happens to the CD36 after internalisation, different roles/functions on different cell types, separate normal function from aberrations in disease. - Rod57 (talk) 13:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Much work needed 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2018/04/03/294512.full.pdf https://www.embopress.org/doi/full/10.15252/embr.201745274. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 07:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed