lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Bible colleges

message: I have placed this category in :Category:Seminaries and theological colleges because the vast majority of Bible colleges clearly identify themselves as existing to prepare students to become members of the clergy or enter other religious careers. 
For example, here are some excerpts from bible college websites:
Founded in 1976, Northland Baptist Bible College exists to train the pastors, missionaries, teachers, and godly laymen of tomorrow.
 
Mission Statement of Peace River Bible Institute:
"To conduct a Bible College, the training of students in a thorough knowledge of the Word of God, Holy Scriptures, and the training of students to become ministers, whether at home or abroad."
The mission of Elim Bible Institute is to glorify God and His Son, Jesus Christ, by assisting the Church to fulfill the mandate of the Great Commission: to preach the Gospel and make disciples of all nations. To this end, we are committed to the task of preparing Christian workers and servant-leaders for revival ministry worldwide, who manifest the character of Christ and who minister in the supernatural power of the Holy Spirit.
Appalachian Bible College, the operational arm of an independent mission agency, serves the fundamentalist Christian community in the strengthening of local churches. Educational programs of the College promote the development of responsible Christian character and maturity, and prepare graduates for vocational and volunteer church-related service.
Since 1967 Nazarene Bible College has fulfilled its mission of preparing men and women for ministry.
 
--Orlady (talk) 04:12, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ravensborg

message: This article should probably be moved; the colon shouldn't be part of the article name like that. My thoughts are either to move it to Norstead and include a disambiguation reference to the other Norstead, or to move it something like "Norstead (Missouri)". I can do the move, but I'm not entirely sure what location it should be moved to. Thoughts? cmadler (talk) 16:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move article
Talk:Programming by demonstration

message: The distinction between PBD and PBE for robotics and software researchers is not right, PBD is used quite often by researchers in human-computer interaction, for example. (Unsigned comment)
:I know of Programming by example only via software.  I was at U.C. Berkeley when PhD candidate Dan Halbert, a student of Susan Graham's, was doing his thesis work on PBE at Xerox PARC.  (I think he also did his masters work on that topic.)  As I noted in a recent edit here, PbE goes back at least to the mid-80s as a term in software research.  PbE as a concept -- well, read the Halbert dissertation I just linked.  IIRC, he traces it back quite a few years earlier, at least as far back as some UI work by Warren Teitelman.
::If anything, I'd prefer separate PbE/PbD articles, with a note in each that there seems to be some terminology overlap between the robotics uses of PbE/PbD (which as an idea must certainly go back at least as far as Kurt Vonnegut's Player Piano?) and the user-interface support idea of PbE Classic (Halbert/PARC).  If you're coming from robotics, look at it this way: maybe PbD is very useful in robotics, so why would you want it associated in any way whatsoever with Microsoft Bob, or Clippy, or that incredibly irritating dolphin that used to swim out at you in Windows (all of which were attempts to make PbE work "for the masses", in Halbert's original vision)? On the other hand, if the two terms really are used interchangeably in both UI work and in robotics, I guess there should be one article after all. :-( Yakushima (talk) 15:21, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  If the approaches in PbE are similar to those in PbD, then there should be only one article about them. The concepts themselves only differ in their application areas. The age of the terms and who uses them should not decide whether there are two articles or one. -Pgan002 (talk) 05:03, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate article from "Programming by Example" 

message: The article states that it dates to mid 80s, but there is work even on the late 70s. See, for instance, the work of Michael Bauer (Programming by Examples) in the AI Journal, published in 1979. I was wondering if, since this article focuses mainly in robotics, if the more theoretical work by Bauer should be considered.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.53.136.210 (talk) 10:46, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early work on programing by demonstration 

message: * Copyedit
* Refs
* Check facts and ensure no improper statements
Chaosdruid (talk) 20:18, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robotics attention needed
Talk:Whispernet

message: I really think that this info should be pushed back into Amazon Kindle and this page deleted.  Mainly because the entirety of the useful information on Whispernet seems to be 2 sentences.  --ShakataGaNai (talk) 19:22, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Propose a merger, then ... or wait to see what happens. D. Brodale (talk) 21:02, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Waited on that merge for a while.  No responses - and all the text of the Whispernet article was already in the main article.  Changed into redirect.  --ShakataGaNai (talk) 07:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  That would be because you didn't follow merge procedures correctly. You have to place the notice on *both* articles, not just the Whispernet article. D. Brodale (talk) 09:01, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purpose for a separate article?
Talk:Old Chief Joseph Gravesite

message: A site near the cemetery was recently part of a controversy over land use and was being threatened with development, but apparently Oregon Parks and Recreation Department and Oregon State Parks Trust have bought the land in question: 
*http://www.nationaltrust.org/magazine/archives/arc_news_2005/091405.htm
*http://www.nathpo.org/News/Tribal/News-Tribal_Governments24.html
*http://rgweb.registerguard.com/news/2007/05/06/c5.cr.park.0506.p1.php?section=nation_world
06:45, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More resources for expansion

message: I am not sure if I'm fully tracking which site is which, and what's for the older vs. the younger Chief Joseph. But I thought the photo on this page of Gaston's Centennial History (public domain) might be of interest. -Pete Forsyth (talk) 21:28, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo to use?
Talk:Brad Womack

message: Come on, we are not allowed to have articles on songs by huge artists, yet an important nobody like him gets an article? Retro Agnostic (talk) 02:26, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, now redirected. Plastikspork (talk) 16:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: This article sucks
Talk:List of Myanmar Motion Picture Academy Awards

message: 1963 Academy awards is not shown. In my all reference, academy awards was not shown in 1963. I will enquiry why or you can write why. --Ekyaw (talk) 04:35, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Avon Riverside railway station

message: Should this station have a Midland Railway info box on it? As far as I know, there was never a station here until the AVR built it miag (talk) 04:37, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not.  I have removed it, and set neighbouring station boxes to avoid it.  David Bailey (talk) 14:38, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:79th Fighter Group

message: Although I corrected and sourced this section, I am not certain of the accuracy of the non-referenced assignment information.  It is unlikely that the group was assigned directly to USAFE while part of the occupation force.  It was more likely assigned to XII Tactical Air Command, but I have no source for this assignment.  Maurer, Combat Units gives USAFE as a command allocation, not a direct assignement.  Also, Maurer indicates that when the 87th Fighter Wing became non-operational, its elements (non specific) were transferred to XXII Tactical Air Command.
There are some inconsistencies with the secondary sources.  Maurer gives a year for assignment to the 87th Fighter Wing, but the specific dates given in the Wiki article for that assignment are contradicted by the AFHRA Factsheet for the 57th Air Division (which should be more reliable).  Maurer indicates assignment to the 8th Fighter Wing while in Egypt and Libya, but this assignment is not noted in the 57th AD Factsheet.
Lineagegeek (talk) 12:53, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assignments
Talk:340th Flying Training Group

message: The vast majority of this article consists of sentence fragments. "Constituted on X. Activated on X." are fragments with no subject; rather, the article should read as "The 382nd Bombardment Group was constituted on such-and-such date and activated on such-and-such date. It was then..." LordAmeth (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Project Assessment
Talk:Back count

message: It seems as if there was some discussion before regarding mreging this article with the BJ article.  Barring any fresh objections, I will do just that here shortly.  Any comments? ♣♦ SmartGuy ♥♠ 16:00, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A merge with the Card counting article would be appropriate, I think, but not with Blackjack. Rray (talk) 16:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops!  I meant to propose a merge to Card counting, not BJ. ♣♦ SmartGuy ♥♠ 17:05, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Blackjack]]
Talk:Escagraph

message: Initial page created to introduce the Wiki community to the not-for-profit academic research by Dr. Larry R. Smith regarding writing on food.
Content here is available for review, update and amendment.
Content at the research site http://www.escagraph.com/ is copyrighted but may be used (with appropriate citation) free of charge.--jake (talk) 04:59, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Shingitai Jujitsu

message: Please note that your notability debate is flawed.   Shingitai Jujitsu was founded by John Saylor.  Please note his biography per his website,"John Saylor is a former 3-time National Judo Champion, 2-time Pan American Medalist, and coach of the U.S. National Judo Training Squad at the Olympic Training Center for 7 years. In 1987 Saylor was voted Coach Of The Year by the United States Judo Association. Today he coaches submission wrestling, jujitsu, self-defense, and mixed martial arts fighters at his “Barn Of Truth Dojo” in Perrysville, Ohio."  
It's philosophy is best described in the University of Tennessee website about Shingitai  Jujitsu:  http://web.utk.edu/~utmaclub/juji/history.php.  
A sampling of additional clubs that teach Shingitai Jujitsu philosophy are:
* http://johnsaylor-sja.com/
* http://www.welcomematjudoclub.com/
* http://asianma.com/jujitsu.html
* http://www.midohiomatclub.com/
* http://www.lawrencegrapplingclub.com/
* http://selfdefensecenter.com/umac/index.html
* http://www.thefightfarm.com/
* http://www.westshorejujitsu.com/
* http://www.kc.net/~jujit/index.htm
* http://combatjiujitsu.tripod.com/index.html
I request the page be reinstated.  The consensus was based on incomplete information.  
Ooda 0402 (talk) 06:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have replied on your talk page.--Nate1481( t/c) 10:37, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Brian Kinchen

message: he should not have been suspended he said nothing wrong  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.90.31.227 (talk) 05:24, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  truth
Talk:Bedford Avenue

message: hipsters are a race/group of people in the same vein as african americans, the chasidim, etc.? please. 24.185.31.111 (talk) 05:14, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  hipsters??? 
Talk:A101 road

message: Without explanation, User:Roads4117 has changed long-existing redirects and amended the article name from Rotherhithe Tunnel to A101 road. The tunnel was constructed long before the road numbering system was introduced, and it features as a destination across large areas of southeast and east London. I cannot seen any justification for such an arbitrary move, and propose to revert this change. Paul W (talk) 08:50, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I see User:Bkonrad reverted the change before I did. Paul W (talk) 09:20, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the name change?
Talk:A1085 road

message: anyone viewing this know why much of its length is named "A1 Trunk Road" (seperate from the A1085 nameplate) on google maps? Is that an official name it's been given (ie a trunk route to the A1...) or is it just a stupid bug? 193.63.174.10 (talk) 16:20, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  out of interest....
Talk:A149 road

message: Well done to whoever took the photos. A good article detailed article even though Wikipedia quibbles with the style. 80.0.131.231 (talk) 13:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have re-added this tag.  The fact that no improvements have been made to date does not mean that they are not necessary. Pastordavid (talk) 15:29, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice pictures 

message: Removed the essay like tag as no action has been taken to re-write this article since October 2007 when the Tag was added by User:Regan123. Haydnaston (talk) 19:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have re-added this tag.  The fact that no improvements have been made to date does not mean that they are not necessary. Pastordavid (talk) 15:29, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Essay-like Tag

message: I have started to cut down the Route description section, removing irrelevant information, but it still needs some more work. Jenuk1985 (talk) 19:40, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: =Started updates

message: The article talks about Morston, and then 'after Blakeney', without saying anything about Blakeney, which is a far more significant place than Morston! Mdrb55 (talk) 22:10, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about Blakeney?
Talk:A17 road (England)

message: Hello. Please note that I have reduced the amount of major junctions from 11 to 10, by deleting the A153. Thanks, Roads4117 (talk) 09:58, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major junctions
Talk:A20 road (England)

message: Hello. I would like to let you know that I have reduced the amount of major junctions on this article from 36 to 21. However, twenty-one is a lot of major junctions, especially for a road with a length of about 72 miles, so if you want to have a look at it then go ahead. If not, then I will do it in the new year. Thank you. Roads4117 (talk) 10:55, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major junctions
Talk:A210 road

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/index.php?title=A210. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 16:15, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:A228 road

message: Does this article need updating in relation to the Hoo area? The A228 appears to follow a new alignment known as Peninsula Way rather than the Ratcliffe Highway, which is relegated to a minor road at this point: see http://tools.geofabrik.de/mc/?mt0=mapnik&mt1=googlemap&lon=0.54494&lat=51.42538&zoom=15 for a comparison of OpenStreetMap (which appears to be up to date) and Google Maps which (like TomTom) is no longer accurate.Sdoerr (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Sdoerr. As one of the main contributors to this article I have to confess that I'm not overly familiar with the finer details of the geography/boundaries on that part of the route, so if you are please go ahead and make whatever amendments that you feel are necessary. Thanks for your contribution! danno 20:56, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: New Alignment at Hoo
Talk:A259 road

message: The road is longer than 19 Miles and it also runs from Emsworth (West End) To Folkestone (East End).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.36.37.33 (talk) 10:59, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not sure if the article is correct on a couple of points? 
Talk:A26 road

message: * The article says "The A26 road is one of the three cross-country two-digit numbered roads"
Surely all the double digit roads in the SE are cross-country. 
If the A26 belongs to the group of double digit roads which does not radiate out from London,
then surely the A28 should be added to the list, and the A29 whilst radiating away from London
never gets any closer than Dorking!
* "The original A26" When was it original? 1920's, 1950's? (It must have been before 1946
because the A26 terminated in Lewes according to http://www.npemap.org.uk/tiles/map.html#540,109,1
* A26 continuing to Brighton - citation please
Johnkenyon (talk) 22:54, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello. I would like to let you know that I have reduced the amount of major junctions on this article from 11 to 7. Thank you. Roads4117 (talk) 11:30, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major junctions
Talk:A26 road (Northern Ireland)

message: I have put an article together on the A26 (as well as expanding on a few of the articles started on other NI primary routes), mainly on the actual route and prospective/planned developments.
Does anyone think it's worthy including a comment about the high level of road accidents/fatalities on this road? Col2006ie (talk) 00:05, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:A28 road

message: Hello. I would like to let you know that I have reduced the amount of major junctions on this article from 16 to 7. Although, of you would like to remove the A2070 because you think that it is a four-digit road and therfore it is not important or something then do, although then the infobox will be very short (only about six roads remaining - not as though that is a bad thing). Thank you. Roads4117 (talk) 11:34, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major junctions
Talk:A299 road

message: *Removed template and updated junction list following realignment of road near Ramsgate in 2012. 
*Info taken from Google Streetview, images dated July 2012.
*Although article text refers to London Manston Airport, I have written the junction list with Kent International Airport (Sic) as that is what the highway authority have written on the road sign (example one)
*Junction list in infobox realigned to the order they appear travelling west to east, per the majority of other UK road infoboxes. Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 20:34, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Out of date template

message: Assessed for Wikipedia:WikiProject_UK_Roads#B-class_drive - passes all five criteria. Upgraded above accoridngly. Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 20:34, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Review
Talk:A3036 road

message: Copied content from Albert Embankment on 12 October 2022; see that page's history for attribution (see WP:RIA for more information).Roads4117 (talk) 15:08, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Copied content from Lambeth Palace Road on 12 October 2022; see that page's history for attribution Roads4117 (talk) 15:19, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Copied content from Lavender Hill on 12 October 2022; see that page's history for attribution Roads4117 (talk) 15:37, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attribution
Talk:A338 road

message: I added another photo in WIKI commons of the A338 that i have taken, i'm not sure if it's nessesary. Megatonman (talk) 16:07, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article states that the road begins in central Bournemouth. This is obviously false as the road begins at County Gates roundabout, which is technically in Poole, although extremely close to the Bournemouth border. I will edit tomorrow if there are no objections.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.66.33.62 (talk) 16:04, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: *Contradiction fixed today. Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 00:43, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start of road 
Talk:A345 road

message: A cleanup exercise with the aim for the standards listed in WP:WikiProject_UK_Roads#B-class_drive:-
*rewritten references to "you" as per WP:MOS
*added subheading
*added name of Countess Roundabout
*rewritten lead section and moved fine detail to the route section
*added link to Stonehenge as a most notable feature close by the road
*added Woodhenge realignment to history section
*populated infobox and added commons image
*moved start/finish coords from inline text to infobox
*added 2 references
*corrected defaultsort from 354 to 345
*added to Roads in Wiltshire
*stub template removed Baldy Bill (talk) 21:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Up-graded article from start class to B  conforms to all six criteria –  – Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard| 07:04, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject uk roads 
Talk:A354 road

message: I suggest that the author of this page is more concerned about Nature than the A354 or any other road; one could speculate that he/she is a PDS (Poor Driving Skills) type who dislikes cars.  A more neutral point of view would recognise that A-roads are a vital component of economic infrastructure, and that bypasses and relief roads have both economomic value and a positive impact on global warming. Edetic (talk) 12:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV Disputed 
Talk:A4012 road

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/index.php?title=A4012. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 16:31, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed