lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cue for Treason

message: I based the dating of the setting on the mention of the public interest in war during the second year, due to Essex having just been sent to Ireland - an historical event of spring 1599. The first production of Henry V was also in 1599 according to tradition. The action of the novel took place between one summer season and the next. The dating is thus a direct deduction from the text. Robina Fox (talk) 16:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Still, perhaps it smacks of "original research" to be precise when the date is not mentioned in the book, so I am changing it to something more general. Robina Fox (talk) 09:32, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Setting

message: Changing Peter's age from 14 to 15 has happened a few times now. Is this possibly a difference between the British and American editions? Or a change in more recent editions? In the British edition I read, his age is definitely 14 at the beginning. Robina Fox (talk) 22:05, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter's age
Talk:Grey High School

message: Photos:
I have quite a few in my library from Grey High. Should be posting some on this article shortly.--Twyford (talk) 13:45, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:USS Sterett (DDG-104)

message: Although the infobox reports "Commissioned: 9 August 2008 (scheduled)", an anonymous editor has updated List of current ships of the United States Navy to indicate that Sterett is a current ship.  I am not sure what the status change is, but perhaps it has now been commissioned.  A similar update by the anonymous editor has been verified (North Carolina was commissioned).  If verification of a status change for this ship can be found, please also update the List of Current Ships, and include a source footnote for the status change. doncram (talk) 17:47, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commissioned? 

message: i just received (july 5, 2008) an invitation to attend the commissioning ceremony for the sterett on aug 9,2008. so my guess is that whoever reported it as active is mistaken. local baltimore news reported the sterett leaving shipyard in maine july 3 or 4 and heading for norfolk va before going up the chesapeake bay to baltimore for commissioning.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.35.104.251 (talk) 18:39, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  re: commissioned
Talk:USS Stockdale (DDG-106)

message: There is many citations missing on this article. Navy.mil website has a lot of articles that are not mentioned on here. It could also be used as a citation source since it’s coming from the Department of the Navy. For instance, the date used one Stockdale’s last deployment is wrong by 18 days.  Enrique09sti (talk) 00:41, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Talk:Flaget High School

message: Funny thing about this is I only saw the article for the first time at 5:30 AM EST on 6/25 and in looking at Wikipedia the same day, 15 hours later there was an AfD and a withdrawal in a very short time.  It seems to me that such an article would barely have time to be written and developed before such a vote can be made.  I think the school is notable and I live 150 miles aways from it.  I did not know it existed while it was still open but only learned of the school when I read articles about Gus Bell and Paul Hornung.  I am glad to see it survived the vote because I think for no more space it takes it was well written and provides valuable information on Wikipedia.  Not a great article but a worthwhile one.  Mfields1 00:57, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article for deletion request and withdrawal
Talk:USS Truxtun (DDG-103)

message: "This modest U.S. show of force – a single warship to the Black Sea – was intended to calm the nerves of former Soviet republics and satellites nervous about Moscow’s actions in invading and taking the Crimea province in the Ukraine,[9] and was meant as ‘strategic reassurance.’[10]"
The USA might see it this way, but the Russian administration and the present Crimean administration will view this quite differently.
Should be rephrased or deleted. Can orignal poster take care of it, please. Edmond V.O. Katusz (talk) 12:31, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  POLITICAL POINT OF VIEW OF USA
Talk:USS Wasp (LHD-1)

message: The Wasp class LHD-1 through LHD-5 are the last Active US Navy Non-Nuclear Rankine cycle surface combatants.. 108.58.175.210 (talk) 19:31, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: See Talk:Wasp-class amphibious assault ship#LHD-1 through LHD-5 are the last US Navy fossil fuel steam ships, and please keep the topic to one talk page. Thank you. - wolf 20:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  LHD-1 through LHD-5 are the last Rankine cycle steam ships
Talk:Blind pig

message: Needs a disambiguation page: don't rely on a capital'P' !
195.137.93.171 19:12, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

message: I've never heard or seen a reference to this type of club as "afterhour" in the singular.  Alcohol can be legally sold between certain hours--plural--and outside of those hours--plural--it cannot.  IMO, usage should be consistently "after hours."
Terry J. Carter (talk) 03:45, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  After Hour (singular?) 

message: Please see this discussion if you want to know why this page has been redirected. --Andrew Kelly (talk) 09:27, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged
Talk:Earl Averill Jr.

message: It's mentioned he shares a streak of 17 PAs of reaching base in every PA with Piggy Ward from June 3rd to June 10th 1962, but it isn't true. He grounded into a force out on June 8th 1962 in the middle of this supposed streak. I think that blurb should be erased and the mention of him also be erased from Piggy Ward's page 2600:1700:7600:2E90:F980:1458:4F8C:26D7 (talk) 05:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Source for the grounding into a forceout https://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/LAA/LAA196206080.shtml 2600:1700:7600:2E90:F980:1458:4F8C:26D7 (talk) 05:02, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  On Base Streak
Talk:Blind Pig (venue)

message: Needs a disambiguation page: don't rely on a capital 'P' !
195.137.93.171 19:13, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: disambig created and I removed "famous" because a claim like that requires a CITATION! Naufana : talk 03:11, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: disambig and famous

message: I grew up in Detroit in the fifties and sixties.  "Blind pig" was widely understood slang for any after-hours nightclub.  (Last call was, and remains, 2 AM in MI.)  So while the raid of a blind pig did have something to do with sparking the Detroit riots, it would be a stretch to say that the Ann Arbor nightclub was named after that raid.  
I also lived in Ann Arbor when the Blind Pig opened, and while my recollection is not authoritative, as I recall things, the club owners wanted to project a noir, booze-and-blues orientation; "Blind Pig" captured that pretty well.  (I also recall that when the club first opened, they refused to serve beer or mixed drinks, only shots neat with choice of a chaser.  Very noir!) Peterhoneyman (talk) 00:09, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of club name
Talk:Tyger (ship)

message: How do we know that the wreck of the "Tyger" stayed put after 9/11? The site (the corner of Greenwich and Dey Sts.) is well into Ground Zero, and for all we know someone might have inadvertently removed the wreck with 9/11 debris. 192.12.88.7 (talk) 03:30, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, sir, they found a smaller vessel while digging. So who knows? http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/14/18th-century-ship-found-at-trade-center-site&no_interstitial  207.238.52.162 (talk) 21:20, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:La Poste (France)

message: Total ownership adds to 108% (74% + 34% of French Government) - needs to be modified 213.46.234.129 (talk) 15:26, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership needs updating 
Talk:George Szamuely

message: I restored the stripped out content and sources. If there are problems with specific ones please discuss it here. I removed all of the religion related categories. Jbh (talk) 22:13, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverted article to prior state and removed PROD

message: No mention of him on GPI's website. Did he leave? Once this is established the article can be updated. https://gpilondon.com/our-people GorisGazoom (talk) 13:55, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Global Policy Institute 

message: Per WP:BLPCRIME "For individuals who are not public figures ... editors must seriously consider not including material—in any article—that suggests the person has committed, or is accused of having committed, a crime, unless a conviction has been secured", I think the Arrest for overdue library books sub-section should be deleted.
The cites we have (and I've googled for better) merely say he was arrested and "had not been arraigned" [3, NYT].  There is no cite saying he was arraigned, brought to trial or convicted. The NYP says Szamuely "would renew books on their due date" [4], which rather brings into doubt that any books were indeed stolen.  What we have is entirely compatible with the police/DA deciding not to prosecute, perhaps having taken the view this wasn't a crime but a civil matter or even a misunderstanding.
Unless more RS cites are found deepening our understanding, I think this is far too trivial for us to override the advice in  WP:BLPCRIME.  Unless anyone objects, I'll delete it in a few days. Rwendland (talk) 12:11, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No objection. Was one of the books Tropic of Cancer? Burrobert (talk) 12:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrest for overdue library books sub-section
Talk:Lewis and Clark-class dry cargo ship

message: *Comment: Suggest this article be renamed to Lewis and Clark class Dry Cargo/Ammunition Ships in accordance with Military Sealift Command designation especially approved for this class of ship.MarkInSavannah (talk) 17:39, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:El Mahrousa

message: The ship was renamed Mahroussa; she is presently widely known as Mahroussa in the news (I've checked in spanish, german, english, french news sites). If noone disagrees, in a week or two, I will rename. Alvar☮ 09:37, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Why wait? Could do with expansion too. Davidships (talk) 13:26, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming the article to Mahroussa ? 

message: I can find no contemporary source of Mahrousa being in the vanguard at the opening of the Suez Canal in 1879. According to Popular Science June 1924 Page 26, the lead ship was L'Aigle, the French Royal Yacht.
The Suez Canal by S. C. Burchell agrees with the fact that L'Aigle carried Eugenie, and though they fail to mention the HMS Newport incident, there is no mention of the Mahrousa.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.26.210.143 (talk) 23:25, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suez Speculation.
Talk:Scott Peters (politician)

message: IMO the incident where someone referred to DeMaio as "Mary" on Scott Peters' blog is too trivial to include here. It was recently deleted by User:Mcd51 and restored with additional references by User:RightCowLeftCoast. However, all of the references are from last May, when it happened - in other words the incident had no lasting significance. We've kept it in the article for six months but there has been no further mention of it in the news; clearly it was a one-day thing. I believe it should be removed per UNDUE and NOTNEWS. --MelanieN (talk) 15:45, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: While it was a single event, it did receive significant coverage itself (nationwide), including the Washington Times, The Daily Caller, & Daily Kos, National Review, and Breitbart.com (August). It can be reduced in size from two sentences to one, if it helps balance if that helps UNDUE concerns. Perhaps it belongs in the DeMaio article instead, as it is whom the language was directed at?--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:38, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It definitely does NOT belong in the DeMaio article. If it is about anybody, it is about Peters, on whose blog (but without whose input) the comment was made. Still, I don't believe a single mention by various media  makes the incident important enough to include. (Most of the national media you name, with the exception of Kos, are right-wing sources which would be eager to give publicity to anything that makes a Democrat look bad; I give more credence to the reporting by local TV stations.) This wasn't even anything that Peters himself did, and it clearly had no lasting impact and did not affect the election. --MelanieN (talk) 20:07, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that User:Stepshep has removed it. It looks to me like we now have three !votes to remove it - Mcd51, myself, and Stepshep - vs. one !vote to keep it - RightCowLeftCoast. So I would say the current consensus is to leave it out. --MelanieN (talk) 19:45, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  FWIW, here's another !vote to leave it out, certainly until someone provides more argument addressing the UNDUE and lasting-impact issues. JesseW, the juggling janitor 07:37, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivial incident 

message: Peters' district no longer includes Poway. The district also changed in some other ways following the 2020 redistricting cycle. 130.191.100.158 (talk) 23:31, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description of district is out of date
Talk:Jean-Marie Peretti

message: I removed the delation message because this article satisfied some of Academic criterias : 
1 The person is regarded as a significant expert in his or her area by independent sources : In France, his a one of the welknown RH experts
3 The person has published a significant and well-known academic work. In France, you can find many of his books both in bookshops and RH manager bookcases. 
TCY (talk) 21:43, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Delation message
Talk:Scow

message: "The flat-bottomed scows were also capable of coming right up on to the beach and grounding, then over the side went duckboards, wheelbarrows and banjo shovels. The crew would then fill the vessel with a cargo of sand.. "
Why did they want a cargo of sand? 
"Logs when hauled were always carried above deck, secured by heavy chain, the space between decks being left empty to give added buoyancy."
This doesn't make sense. It doesn't matter where on a boat you put the load, the overall buoyancy is still the same. Also, as the article states, scows already have poor rough-water handling, and putting a heavy weight high up on the boat will make it worse and more liable to capsizing under wind or waves.  I suspect the true reason might be that the logs were often too awkwardly shaped to make it worth putting them below decks.   I don't know enough to amend the article though, but this error makes me suspicious of the veracity of the rest of this section of the article. 
RedTomato (talk) 07:48, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: You raise a number of valid points. I suspect the beach sand was merely to add some weight, since I doubt the replenishing of the sand on the Auckland beaches from the abundant supply farther north was a priority in the pioneer era. That being said, I am sufficiently familiar with Northland to consider the basic gist of the section as appearing sound. However, the length of this section is disproportionate. The number of scows built in NZ would have been a drop in the bucket when compared to those in say British Columbia. Perhaps a NZer familiar with boating matters might be willing to revise the section and spin it off as a separate article. DMBanks1 (talk) 15:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hey I personally work as an oyster and clam farmer in the pacific northwest and felt its worth mentioning that we still use scows for our work as boats that we load and unload product and supplies from. My department has a metal scow, a wooden scow, and a power scow. a power scow basically has a similar engine you would see on a boat and doesn't need another boat to push or pull it around. 
I was thinking of editing the article to add these details but I know Wikipedia likes to have stuff cited by some form of reputable source. How would I even find sources regarding this? I only know they exist because I use them near daily. I never even heard the word "scow" before my first job on a clam farm, and never see them referenced either in literature or in ordinary life, let alone modern usage for commercial agriculture. Goldscurvy (talk) 20:49, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scows still in use, power scows
Talk:Sophie of France (1786–1787)

message: Princess Sophie Hélène Béatrice NOT Béatrix.  Mistake was made by person who created the article back on 11 November 2006, and it was never corrected.  Also, the word Princess does not have to go in title of article, no more than title of her sister's article is Princess Marie-Thérèse Charlotte of France, but Marie-Thérèse Charlotte de France.  Titles etc. come later in article.  I am thus moving article to
:Sophie Hélène Béatrice de France, *de France* being her surname.  
Frania W. (talk) 18:34, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sophie Hélène ''Béatrice'' de France

message: Was she *really* known as Madame Sophie at such a young age, or is this a mistake based on the previous version of the first paragraph of the Biography section? It said, "She was known as Madame Sophie." But the antecedent for "She" was the baby's great-aunt, not the baby Sophie. I verified in the great-aunt Sophie's article that she was called Madame Sophie later in life. We need a verifiable citation that the baby Sophie was also called Madame Sophie or not. 
::Section Styles here: , at wiki article Fils de France . --Frania W. (talk) 16:32, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was the baby Sophie also called Madame Sophie? 

message: Why on earth does a "person" who lived only 11 months merit her own page on Wikipedia, together with a reference to her under the "significant" dates pages?
I have seen several people's individual pages being removed because they are not "notable" enough, even if they have sold some records or published books (just not enough, I guess),and I don't have a problem with that, since we don't need everyone trying to make this a personal Who's Who self-pat on the back.  But a child who doesn't even survive a whole year, let alone do anything with her life of import at all, should not be getting her own separate references all over the place (I arrived at this page via the May 7 page).
I vote that this ENTIRE "stub" get merged under Marie Antoinette.
Wikipedia's own rules state that "trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability"; the person should have "made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field"; and last, but certainly not least, "being related to a notable person in itself confers no degree of notability upon that person."
Prosandcons (talk) 16:03, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Somewhat more than ten years later, your wish is granted, . Joyous! | Talk 21:01, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who the hell cares?
Talk:Rillettes

message: The fact that they mention that rilettes was traditionally made with pork, is kind of proof that creton comes from rillettes and was brought over to Quebec by French peasents centuries ago. Although cretons is also made with chicken and even turkey, pork is more commonly used. Either way, rillettes and cretons, I think, have the same origin.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.139.0.55 (talk) 14:58, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Pâtisserie

message: Is there really enough difference between a cake shop and a patisserie to justify an entire separate article on the subject? I know that part of the problem is that cake shops are not an important part of English culture, but when the Polish Cukiernia site connects to a page about German Konditorei (whatever they may be) it is clear that the subject is a mess. Why are we writing more about French/Belgian bakeries than we are about their English equivalents? Let's combine Patisserie with the cakery/cake shop article (which needs expanding anyway) and scrap the one about Konditorei. I've just completed a translation from Polish into English about this subject and Wikipedia proved to be precisely no help whatsoever. 78.11.154.119 (talk) 01:03, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: This page should be merged with cakery

message: The entire section on the “World Cup of Pastry” is, while tangentially related to the main article, not directly a part of explaining the concept of “a shop that sells or specializes in baked goods.” It is akin to including a section explaining the history of the Academy Awards in an article about movie theatres. 
The two ideas should be separated into their own articles.
2600:1700:CDA0:76F0:C825:F364:B89A:9584 (talk) 09:59, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  “World Cup of Pastry” section completely unrelated
Talk:Tung Hua Lin

message: I have classified this article as a start due to its level of detail. Capitalistroadster 19:40, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start classification

message: I spent some time with T.H. Lin at UCLA in the mid 1980's. The design and construction of the C-0101 was a heroic task, with the construction relying on scrap airplane parts, bamboo, and wood. The construction techniques derived largely from "traditional" Chinese scaffolding and temporary construction. Working conditions were ridiculously primitive. He may well be said to have built a modern cargo aircraft single-handedly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 (talk) 22:17, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: A Heroic Engineer
Talk:Black French

message: What is the benefit of this redirect, when immigration to France is about a huge number of different groups? Freee Contributor (talk) 16:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is there a redirect to Immigration in France? 

message: The redirect Black French (disambiguation) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Kk.urban (talk) 05:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Black French (disambiguation)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Honoré Théodoric d'Albert de Luynes

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://hdl.handle.net/10020/cifa2012r14. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 20:26, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed