Talk:Animal embryonic development

message: This article is very informative, but it deals only with mammalian development, blastocysts are exclusive to mammals. They can be, roughly, seen as the equivalent to the blastula in mammals, but they are not blastulas.
I think this article should:
*be renamed "mammalian embryogenesis" or something like that, blastocyst redirecting there.
*a new embryogenesis article should deal with general embryogenesis, with morulas, blastulas, gastrulas, blastiocysts, etc. explaining the differences, which stage follows after each, etc.
if this is ok with everyone, i can try and do it (but starting tomorrow by night)  --Tycho 20:50, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Cells start mayor differentiation processes, losing their pluripotentiality. 
shouldn't mayor be major?
-where is the article's image?
i thought i've seen it before but it got lost..
==============
I believe the illustration on this page has some errors. The cells labeled ectoderm are actually the epiblast -- They will later become ectoderm after the primitive streak forms and gastrulation starts. The cells labeled endoderm are actually hypoblast celss -- They will be replaced by cells that migrate from the primative streak and THEN become endoderm. The layer of cells labeled mesoderm, is technically mesoderm but it is extraembryonic mesoderm -- it will form the chorion (and therefore part of the placenta). The embryonic mesoderm will be formed from cells in the primative streak and is located between the embryonic ectoderm and embryonic endoderm. Other than these errors the illustration is very clear and easy to understand -- is it possible for it to be corrected? --Dbrouse 22:18, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  spelling mistake? 

message: I believe the illustration on this page has some errors. The cells labeled ectoderm are actually the epiblast -- They will later become ectoderm after the primitive streak forms and gastrulation starts. The cells labeled endoderm are actually hypoblast celss -- They will be replaced by cells that migrate from the primative streak and THEN become endoderm. The layer of cells labeled mesoderm, is technically mesoderm but it is extraembryonic mesoderm -- it will form the chorion (and therefore part of the placenta). The embryonic mesoderm will be formed from cells in the primative streak and is located between the embryonic ectoderm and embryonic endoderm. Other than these errors the illustration is very clear and easy to understand -- is it possible for it to be corrected? --Dbrouse 22:18, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ==

message: would sympathtic editors consider a positive vote here? Slrubenstein   |  Talk 15:34, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  embryology 

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#:a (tagged and captioned):  b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
#Overall: 
#:a Pass/Fail: 
In short:
The lead is awkward and a poor introduction to the article, and the rest of the text is somewhat weak. It uses only two references, neither of which is particularly notable. It fails to put the process in context - not even a link to reproduction? Meiosis?  Gastrulation section is biased towards Deuterostomes. 
Needs a lot of work, I fear, but it is a good start. Adam Cuerden talk 11:24, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Nominated 

message: Maybe, instead of (or additional to) showing the drawing which illustrates the cleavage, we could provide an example for this developmental stage? This WikiCommons movie should do it. Any comments/suggestions? Ptrrupprecht (talk) 16:41, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  embryology 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:06, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:19, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The 'About' info at the top of the page currently states:
"This article is about embryogenesis of all animals. For human embryonic development, see Human embryonic development. For plant embryogenesis, see Plant embryogenesis."
Surely, then, this page should be called either "Animal Embryonic Development" or "Animal Embryogenesis".
Currently, it is called "Embryonic Development".
For consistency, maybe it would be nice if all 3 pages (Animal, Plant, and Human) used either "Embryonic Development" or "Embryogenesis" in the title.
Famedog (talk) 11:23, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  If this article is only about animal embryonic development why is it called 'Embryonic Development' and not 'Animal Embryonic Development'.