Talk:Window of Opportunity (Stargate SG-1)

message: Best episode, IMO.  (Opes 22:01, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Are these in any particular order at present?  I'd think that chronological order might be best, especially as this will more logically group the "Bad example" triad.  Alai 15:56, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotes 

message: The article says that Earth was caught in the loop for at least three months, but then says a minimum of 216 days. That doesn't seem to make any sense, three  months would be more like 90 days... Is this a mistake? Solanum 04:59, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total length trapped in loop 

message: :Image:Windowofopportunitystargate.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. – sgeureka t•c 08:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Windowofopportunitystargate.JPG

message: GA Review Requests
Lead
*Since we are an international project, in what country it first aired should be added.
*Might want to add why there was a shortage of footage.
Plot
*Any character article for Malikai?  No problems if there isn't, I'm just wondering.
::No, he was a one-time character, completely unimportant outside of this episode.
*Teal'c and O'Neill have already been linked in the lead, they should be de-linked here. 
Reception
*All reviews given here are positive.  Are there any negative ones that could be added to give a more even perspective on the episode?
::No negative reviews that I am aware of, especially not off-forum .
*Xpose is a red link, should be de-linked.
::It seems to be a major British cult magazine, so I redirected the redlink to the publishing company.
External Links
*It's usually customary to link the page to the same episode page at imdb.com.
Other than those, looks good. Mastrchf91 (t/c) 18:59, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This review came much quicker than I expected, but I won't complain. :-) I tried to address all of your concerns, but I left replies above where I couldn't or wouldn't address them. Thank you for your throrough review, and please let me know if you see more that needs fixing. – sgeureka t•c 19:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Review

message: I don't think this exchange,
: Carter: "Both of them claim they have memories of SG-1's mission to P4X-639." 
: Hammond: "A mission that isn't scheduled to start for six hours."
is a claim that the loop lasts for six hours. The loop began a while before this, and will end a while after the mission's scheduled start-time.
: Carter: "Maybe you were sent back in time." 
: O'Neill: "For what? Six hours?"
This does look like a claim of a six-hour duration. But maybe it's occurring six hours after breakfast, and O'Neill is referring to the time back to the start of the loop rather than its full length?
—WWoods (talk) 17:52, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Googling "window of opportunity" "six hours" stargate -"ten hours" gives you about 50-66% of what "window of opportunity" "ten hours" stargate -"six hours" gives, i.e. it's still pretty vague. Daniel could just be approximating the time, for all we know. But it is not really wikipedia's job to analyse anyway, just to report and let people draw their own conclusions. (I'm just happy to no longer be confused whether it's six hours or ten hours, but that is probably a continuity error.) – sgeureka t•c 23:11, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time loop length 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Window of Opportunity (Stargate SG-1). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071127111527/http://www.absolutewrite.com/novels/stargate-sg.htm to http://www.absolutewrite.com/novels/stargate-sg.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:51, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Window of Opportunity (Stargate SG-1). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090301011403/http://www.gateworld.net/interviews/joseph_mallozzi_1.shtml to http://www.gateworld.net/interviews/joseph_mallozzi_1.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:26, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)