Talk:Olga Constantinovna of Russia

message: As per Wiki naming convention for former royal consorts Mowens35 19:35, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move proposal 

message: The following allegation was added 16:58, 23 February 2006 by Rvondeh:
:The image shown is a VAndyk image which is copyright National Portrait Gallery London, and hence should not be used without permission.
On the image page, however, Craigy144 identifies it as Public Domain. Mdotley 20:32, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio ? 

message: You don't want any effort done to not make the image choice look like it was scratched up by a team of bobcats all over her face on your day in the mainpage?
I can live with your decision. I shan't bother to finish the restoration, I shan't bother to try and put it back, it's obvious that any such work won't be appreciated. Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:01, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly your PC has a caching issues and you're looking at an old version of the page. Materialscientist (talk) 05:02, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

text: *Comment - I've just forced a purge on my laptop, and the restoration by MSci (thanks, by the way) still seems to have significant scratching around the eyes, moreso than the version by Adam. I am not seeing what could be, in good faith, called vandalism. I only note that Adam's restoration has more whitespace than the version currently in the article. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:07, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I'm really stressed out over some events happening tomorrow that I'm dreading, and am not really handling the stress very well. I did the restoration, focusing on the face, in order to try and get it cleaned up as much as possible in time for this. I can't really focus, so I'm just going to go to bed, and hopefully things'll look better after a nap. They won't, of course; the thing I'm dreading will only be closer then, but...Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:08, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

text: You were reverted because you mistakenly re-inserted obvious vandalism. The image was removed at first because at the time it was removed it had no license, no source, and looked no different from the previous image apart from being smaller and more difficult to see. You responded with sarcasm, but despite that no other editor made any further reverts regarding the image. Please examine edits more closely in future, and rethink whether calling other editors "ungrateful, ignorant pricks" was fair in this instance. DrKay (talk) 08:33, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Okay 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Olga Constantinovna of Russia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120207054728/http://www.arts.yorku.ca/hist/tgallant/documents/carabottgospelriot_000.pdf to http://www.arts.yorku.ca/hist/tgallant/documents/carabottgospelriot_000.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:19, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I've removed this section because it's poorly sourced (primary sources that fail verification or contradict themselves) and dubious. It's a new addition and is attracting inexplicable drive-by edits without edit summaries. DrKay (talk) 07:13, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Titles and styles