Talk:Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005

message: Just reverted some NPOV vandalism:
:UPDATED:  The bombings in London on July 18th are likely a plot by Blair's government to force through more draconian measures against brown people.  
which was placed at the top of the page. RishiAggarwal 14:11, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

message: From the article: "which in some cases may derogate (opt out) from human rights laws."
Shouldn't that be "which is contrary to human rights laws"?  Ojw 21:16, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Weasel terms and a euphamism?

message: We should have an article and see also it here. --bodnotbod 17:18, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: What's the Bill that Blair was just defeated on called?

message: "In April 2006, a High Court judge issued a declaration that section 3 of the Act was incompatible with the right to a fair trial under article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The Act was described by Mr Justice Sullivan as an 'affront to justice'"
Can we have some citation for this?
Hypnoticmonkey (talk) 15:51, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A citation has now been added. Road Wizard (talk) 16:58, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Affront to justice?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050314003820/http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/terrorism/govprotect/legislation/ptb.html to http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/terrorism/govprotect/legislation/ptb.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050309003449/http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/terrorism/govprotect/legislation/atcsa.html to http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/terrorism/govprotect/legislation/atcsa.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050301194713/http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/docs4/Part_IV_Feb_05.pdf to http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/docs4/Part_IV_Feb_05.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060214191237/http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/jt200405/jtselect/jtrights/61/6102.htm to http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/jt200405/jtselect/jtrights/61/6102.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060725072407/http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/2006-04-26_MW_HS-Berriew_Fi1.pdf to http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/2006-04-26_MW_HS-Berriew_Fi1.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050906060329/http://www.justice.org.uk/images/pdfs/preventionterrorismbill2.pdf to http://www.justice.org.uk/images/pdfs/preventionterrorismbill2.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050505062436/http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/engEUR450062005?open&of=eng-gbr to http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/engEUR450062005?open&of=eng-GBR
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927100539/http://www.counter-terrorism-law.org/2007ewhc233.htm to http://www.counter-terrorism-law.org/2007ewhc233.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The section describing the remarkable parliamentary ping-pong calls it a "constitutional crisis". This is nonsense. An impasse was avoided and the bill ultimately passed under the ordinary process, albeit in a single, very long day. No source is cited describing it as such and it is not listed at Constitutional crisis. Hairy Dude (talk) 13:21, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constitutional crisis