lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hinkley Point A nuclear power station

message: Would it not make sense to merge the hinkley point A, B and C articles into one, to make a much more substancial article? Fintan264 (talk) 16:25, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it would be appropriate to merge them as, although they are at the same geographic location, they represent very different time periods in nuclear development, use different technologies and are at very different stages in their lifecycle.— Rod talk 17:03, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree with Rod. Different stations, different technologies, different timelines. --TimTay (talk) 18:49, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Yep, me too. Too different, leave as is. Rwendland (talk) 01:02, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, they do cover different periods of nuclear technology, and are at different stages in their existence, but merging into one article would help to simplify finding information on the stations, and through having them gathered in one place could possibly help compare the different types of technology. Hinkley Point is one of only two power stations on Wikipedia that I know have been written about in this way, the others being the Hunterston A and B power stations. All others are written about in one article per site. Take Littlebrook Power Station for example. Not two, but four stations have been built on that site over the past 70 years, using not one, but two types of fuel over that period. You may argue that the A, B and C stations have little written about them on this particular article, but that is clearly because no one has taken the time to write about them. With Hinkley Point A, B and C each having been written about separately, a fair bit of information has built up, and a merge would create a substancial, definitive article on the past, present and future of the Hinkley Point site. Fintan264 (talk) 01:31, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There doesn't seem to be agreement about this so can we remove the merge tags - unless anyone else wants to contribute to the debate?— Rod talk 22:12, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge tag removed.— Rod talk 18:33, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: In the Museum of Retrotech http://douglas-self.com/MUSEUM/POWER/oddfluid/oddfluid.htm#rub I found a link to a report about a steam turbine failure in 1969: http://pme.sagepub.com/content/186/1/341 2003:45:5950:BADA:F5C5:5735:2F7D:7CF8 (talk) 05:51, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Catastrophic" steam turbine failure in 1969? 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Berkeley Nuclear Power Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. Rosbif73 (talk) 15:25, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 October 2020
Talk:Oral Tradition (journal)

message: The publication history section of this article is out of date, but as an associate of the journal Oral Tradition, I hesitate to update the article myself. The article should be updated to reflect the following:
-Since 2019, Oral Tradition has been published by Harvard University's Center for Hellenic Studies.
-Oral Tradition publishes special issues on specific conceptual topics and regional traditions.
-Oral Tradition publishes audiovisual materials in the form of eCompanions associated with specific articles.
2607:FB60:1011:2006:0:0:0:206A (talk) 21:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Changes
Talk:Journal of the American Mathematical Society

message: I don't understand the point of the "sources" tag.  Are we going to find a better source for when JAMA started publishing than JAMA itself, which is available on its website?  Obviously not. -- Walt Pohl (talk) 15:09, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources tag 

message: I am trying to determine if American Journal of Mathematics is a former title of this journal. I think it was in existence from 1878  to 1979. Beginning in 1927 it was published "under the auspices of Johns Hopkins University (with the American Mathematical Society)"  . It is also listed in the NLM catalog . Well, another mystery to solve. Time to take out the pipe... ----Steve Quinn (talk) 06:55, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The American Journal of Mathematics is a separate journal, still publishing. It has a page at . In general, the MathSciNet entry for a journal usually has the former name, if the journal changed names while it was being indexed by them. — Carl (CBM · talk) 13:08, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: A possible former title
Talk:Berth

message: Hey, I've done *very* little boating in my life, and don't know port from starboard. The images I found seem to fit the description of berth as described in the article as I understand them, but could someone double check? And more importantly, could someone note in those captions which type of birth they each fall under (e.g. marina berth, settee birth)? Thanks in advance. --YbborTalk 21:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Confirmation and description of images
Talk:USS O'Bannon (DD-987)

message: A US Navy IP address posted the following: "6 October 2008, sank by U.S. Naval gun fire in the Atlantic Ocean approximately 235 NM’s off the cost of North Carolina." I can't find a source verifying this, but it might be worth looking into. --Dual Freq (talk) 00:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sinkex
Talk:Halse, Somerset

message: Although I do like the inclusion of the pub in the section about "Religion" and some would argue beer is sacred, I'm not sure it belongs here! ;-) Robertjcthomson (talk) 12:25, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree and have removed it.— Rod talk 12:44, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pub
Talk:The American Review: A Whig Journal

message: Poe never worked on the staff of the American Review. In 1844, he was hired by N. P. Willis for the New York Mirror. The comment in the article is in error. Outis.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.111.90.36 (talk) 21:39, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected! Thank you for dropping by with your expertise, Outis. --Midnightdreary 01:23, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors in article 

message: * among other sources, "The American Whig Review, 1845-1852: its history and literary contents" by Donald Frank Andrews. University of Tennessee, 1977 • Serviceable†Villain 03:56, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  ended 1852 not 1849
Talk:Administrative divisions of Cape Verde

message: As the country is referred to as 'Cape Verde' in English should the title of the article reflect this? Jackiespeel (talk) 16:52, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of the article 

message: Reverse the 'groups of islands' - so the same order as on the table. Jackiespeel (talk) 08:46, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion
Talk:Ars Combinatoria (journal)

message: The link to the homepage was broken. It seems that the journal has gone offline, but is still producing issues. I changed the url to the most recent archive.org version, feel free to correct Triangl (talk) 11:57, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It is now http://www.combinatoire.ca/ArsCombinatoria/index.html (thanks to some research by Jannis Harder for finding this by looking through old DNS records to find the IP address used by the old url and discover that it is now named by this url). —David Eppstein (talk) 21:56, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homepage broken
Talk:Godney

message: I edited the page because a popular nickname for Britney spears, is godney.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrMiChiMad (talk • contribs) 17:25, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for responding to my message. If that is the case it would be good to add a comment into the article explaining it rather than just adding the template link, and adding a reference for verification.— Rod talk 17:30, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Britney Spears
Talk:Plesiopleurodon

message: I ran across this page, thought the name sounded odd, and checked it out.  I can't find any record of a Plesioliopleurodon having been described, or existing outside of mirrors of this page, but I do find that there is a Plesiopleurodon, also a Cretaceous pliosaurid, described in 1996, which is oddly missing from the List of plesiosaurs (until I go and add it).  I suggest that Plesioliopleurodon is a typo for Plesiopleurodon; unless record exists of this name being used, it should be moved to Plesiopleurodon and the information about Walking with Dinosaurs removed, because I find no evidence of that either at the Australian mirror of the WWD site. J. Spencer 16:53, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have any kind of confirmation that these sites and games were created by the makers of the show? I thought tie-in sites like that were usually put together by contracted web developers. How can you be sure the names for the unidentified animals weren't just picked by some random programmer because htey sounded good and fit vaguely into the show's timeline? Especially since these sites no longer exist, I think citing them as any kind of credible source is a real problem. Dinoguy2 04:01, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Still doesn't indicate that the producers of WWD had anything to do with making the web sites. In fact getting simple facts like the name of the animals wrong (Plesioliopleurodon instead of Plesiopleurodon) is a pretty good indicator that whoever did make the official site was not overly familiar with the facts... Dinoguy2 05:34, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No such thing as ''Plesioliopleurodon''?

message: The article puts Plesiopleurodon in the Polycotylidae, placed there by Ketchum HF, Benson RBJ. However it is listed, with a ?, under Pliosauridae. It is not listed as a polycotylid. So where does it belong (for now), in the Polycotulidae as here indicated, or in the Pliosauridae. J.H.McDonnell (talk) 12:37, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Polycotylidae is the current placement, you will notice that the taxonomic list at Pliosaur is now 10 year old and should be updated with references such as Ketchum & Benson 2010.-Kevmin § 13:48, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

text: It show what groups have members who are watching this page. --Kevmin § 13:48, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  To which family
Talk:USS Paul F. Foster

message: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/04/08/navy-showboats-destructive-new-laser-gun/ -- The Foster sets another milestone as the first Navy Vessel to destroy a target using a Laser. Go DD-964! Fightin' Phillie 22:01, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  USS Foster first ship to use Lasers 

message: I was going over this article and noticed that an image I had added was no longer there.  Looking at the revision history it seems that the image was removed when the gallery format was added to the article.  Barring any edit comments or talk discussion I assume that this was unintentional.   I went and added the image back to the gallery.  I feel this image belongs in the article because there are no other images of the ship in her role as Self Defense Test Ship in the article. If other editors feel this image does not belong in the article I'm happy to discus.  Raitchison (talk) 20:53, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  (re) adding image to gallery of ship in SDTS role
Talk:British Journal of Pharmacology

message: Nature Publishing Dropped the BJP. It's now handled by Wiley-Blackwell, See Volume 156, Issue 1, Pages 1-3 Bilz0r (talk) 01:52, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *Guide to Receptors and Channels obviously should be a section of this article. Doesn't make much sense to have two stubs,one on the journal and one on (one of?) its supplements. --Crusio (talk) 04:58, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Complex Systems (journal)

message: Notable people on the editorial board are
* Philip Warren Anderson
* Mitchell Feigenbaum
* Hermann Haken
* John H. Holland
* W. Daniel Hillis
* Richard Karp
* Stuart Kauffman
* Yoshiki Kuramoto
* John Milnor
* Andrew Odlyzko
* Steven A. Orszag
* Stanley Reiter
* Terry Sejnowski
* Alvy Ray Smith
* Tommaso Toffoli
-- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 23:15, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editorial board
Talk:Farleigh Hungerford

message: I have tidied up this section a little, and added some information. The Hungerfords were not lords at this time. Sir Edward Hungerford (d. 1648) commanded the Parliamentarian forces only briefly, but was ineffective and was effectively replaced by William Waller. The "later Lord Hungerford" originally referred to was presumably Sir Edward Hungerford (1632-1711), last of the male line and son of Anthony Hungerford (1607-1657), half brother of Sir Edward (d. 1648). As Anthony was a staunch royalist, and his son was only born in 1632, I assume the references to Sir Edward junior's parliamentarianism are either conflations with the actions of his uncle, or prompted by his election to Parliament under Richard Cromwell. Either way, I think that simply referring to the latter fact is less tenuous. I have also added that this Sir Edward sold the castle in 1686. Alex Craven (talk) 03:21, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Some of this "tidying" would also be appropriate at Farleigh Hungerford Castle.— Rod talk 08:25, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. I'll get around to it, but right now I'm just focusing on Wiltshire articles. Cut and paste? --Alex Craven (talk) 04:11, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civil War 

message: I've changed the local government districts in the infobox from BANES to Mendip/Somerset, and also the constituency from North East Somerset to Somerton & Frome. The village is just (admittedly only just) inside the county boundary - checked on the OS maps, and also confirmed by the Norton St Philip parish council website. Also changed the category accordingly. DavidWard talk 21:36, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Local gov district and constituency 
Talk:Wee Cooper O'Fife

message: This article should be merged with "The Wife Wrapt in Wether's Skin", as they are the same song. Ogg (talk) 09:05, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the two songs are different enough to justify separate articles, but their affinity might be noted in each article. -- Chironomia (talk) 06:30, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Emborough

message: I propose that Emborough Pond be merged into this articl as it is unlikely ever to have enough information to make a significant article on its own.— Rod talk 21:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As there were no objections, merge completed.— Rod talk 17:20, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Edward Bourchier, 4th Earl of Bath

message: Deleted unsourced ref. to American descendants in male line: (Progeny:) "William Bourchier (b. 1624) married Sarah Coole. Their granddaughter Sarah Bourchier moved to America and continued a long line of American Bourchier descendants". Not only unsourced, but if true why did not the earldom descend to him? Why not mentioned in Vivian's Heraldic Visitation of Devon? (Lobsterthermidor (talk) 16:29, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: American male line?
Talk:Durotriges

message: If no rulers are known, that line could usefully be omitted from the infobox, if it were more flexibly constructed (not usually a priority). Can anyone effect this deletion?--Wetman (talk) 00:41, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Disinfobox
Talk:Rose Bruford College

message: I greatly miss a section, with images, of fascilites, and venues like the Barn and the Rose? It is not advertising to inform about a school or suchness that you love, have a subjective relation with, are biased about; yet seek to be utmost honest to yourself, and others. The more information is everywhere and too much, regard knowledge and the noble sense of knowing; the more of that the more don't fake it. Hold it, and leak your colors--Xact (talk) 22:29, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fascilities 

message: I've tried removing the trivia section and moving the three entries into the main article.  wp:trivia discourages trivia sections, and I hope that I have interpreted the spirit of that guideline correctly.  Does this seem OK to others? ThomasL (talk) 19:39, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 
Talk:Drayton, Somerset

message: The list of references has two entries, each numbered "1".  I'm guessing this is a consequence of the use of different reference templates.  It may be that the Somerset population estimates template is causing the problem, but I'm not sure, and I'm not familiar with that template anyway, so I'm not going to try to correct the problem. JamesMLane t c 21:56, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You were right there were 2 ref templates in use - I have updated the population figure one to the current recomended style Template:Cite web & it has resolved the problem (It's probably best to link to the specific PDF rather than the general county oneanyway).— Rod talk 07:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference numbering problem 
Talk:Draycott, Somerset

message: This article is a mess. Material in the lead could go elsewhere. The section 'the narrows' includes OT material, and I question whether this section should be here at all, as well as needing a citation. Derek Andrews (talk) 21:17, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Have re-organised the lead and marked the article as stub class and changed the tag accordingly.  Polyamorph (talk) 07:38, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organise tag 

message: Added a brief section on the Burges font controversy.  Surely notable in the context of this small parish.  KJP1 (talk) 14:08, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: St Peter's
Talk:Earl Okin

message: Thank you deb, I'm in the process of building this page and asserting importance/significance is one of my aims. The guy has 4LPs/2CDs and a Guinness Book of Records entry for the number of years he's appeared at the Edinburgh Fringe, he definitely qualifies as notable once I manage to put this information up. JohnHarris 17:18, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I forgot about the article, I'll have another try at getting all the information together and expanding it. Earl Okin isn't insignificant though, he's been England's great Bossa Nova exponent for decades. Not having an article on him is like deciding to ignore Segovia, or having a book on Important Composers Of Popular Music From Liverpool and not including Lennon and Macartney. When it comes to English Bossa Nova Earl Okin isn't just a chapter, he's the subject. I'll be a bit more factual in the article, mind.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cb6 (talk • contribs) 08:18, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do work on it because right now it's still speedy eligible. You need to include the information and cite them to reliable sources. Am happy to help TravellingCari 14:10, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion 

message: I couldn't find anything I'd qualify as peacock language except a couple of extraneous words building up his role in the resurgence of variety shows. I've altered that statement to make it more neutral and removed the template. If anyone still sees the template as necessary, please respond here and I'll work more to fix it. Currently, I'm working under the assumption that the template was applied way back in the revisions, and was simply never removed along the way.
Thanks! Skeletor3000 (talk) 21:22, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peacock template removed
Talk:Dorset and Somerset Air Ambulance

message: I've done some work to the article, including changing the format slightly, correcting grammar and tidying it up a little, while bringing it in line with WP:NPOV. I've also removed the category "organisations based in Dorset", since the article clearly states the base is in Somerset, though that's of less consequence. The most important change is the addition of reliable sources through inline citations so that information can be verified. Some facts still lack these, but the official website is down for refurbishment by the looks if it, so they may have to wait until its back up. Please do not remove this well sourced information unless you can replace with such- for example, I changed the response time to 20 minutes, as that's the figure I could find a source for- it might well be 19, so change it back to 19 IF you back it up. HJ Mitchell (talk) 06:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing
Talk:Donyatt

message: The census of 2011 occurred 5 years ago. Therefore the village had a population of 347 in 2011. Also, the census website provided by the Office of National Statistics makes it very clear that it gives the population of the civil parish, not the village. These errors are present for many villages. --Oldontarian (talk) 19:33, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Census of 2011
Talk:Dinder

message: This article talks about the River Sheppey, but the list of List of rivers of England has a River Sheppy flowing into the River Axe, Somerset does anyone know which is correct?— Rod talk 10:49, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OS uses Sheppey (1:25,000 ST 552 443, ST 524 435). There is a Sheppey Inn at Godney. SCC uses Sheppey here,   but it doesn't mention draining into the Axe. However, looking at the maps of the area it is very difficult to figure what goes where and in what direction, so someone could easily have screwed up. There is a Sheppy's cider, and the Isle of Sheppey is sometimes spelled that way, so i wonder if that is causing a change in popular spelling? Derek Andrews 13:20, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks I've corrected the spelling on List of rivers of England & made a request for this & other rivers to be created on Wikipedia:WikiProject Somerset. — Rod talk 16:41, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: River Sheppey now has an article.— Rod talk 22:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  River name 

message: This may be a reference to Lewis Vulliamy (1791–1871), but I cannot verify this. NinetyCharacters (talk) 15:20, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This comes from ref 3 on the list "Images of England" which doesn't give a first name but dates it to c1850.— Rod talk 21:06, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Vulliany"
Talk:Democracy (journal)

message: Is the Journal of Democracy still functioning as a publisher? As of January 28, 2022, all of their telephone numbers on their website are out-of-service. I ordered the publication a year ago for myself and never received an issue. I've never received a response other than the initial confirmation of an order. Most of their articles on the website look old. I didn't find a reasonably currently-dated one. Does anyone know if they still exist? Stevenmitchell (talk) 15:43, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the Journal Still Functioning?
Talk:Curry Rivel

message: I would suggest that Burton Pynsent be merged into this article as it is a hamlet within the parish and that Burton Pynsent House get its own article.— Rod talk 21:33, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As there were no objections after 2 months I've now completed the merge.— Rod talk 18:47, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Curry Mallet

message: I started to edit and wikify the information on this article about the manor house and realised this is likely to be a copy from another site and is likely to be a copyright violation (including original referencing etc) with a lot of duplication of text. Does anyone know who added it or where it came from?— Rod talk 21:23, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Following advice at Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems#Possible copyvio, unkown source & unsure - Curry Mallet I propose removing the text about the manor house which was added in this edit. Does anyone else object or have further sources which could verify the information - perhaps in a different form of words?— Rod talk 22:43, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyvio 