Talk:Time After Time (1979 film)

message: There's another movie called Time After Time so I'm going to move this.
that is a TV SHOW, fwiw.  i dunno what u "moved", but maybe u need to move it BACK then.  209.172.25.69 (talk) 03:12, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since he's called Herbert throughout the bulk of the film, I've changed "H.G." to "Herbert" in the plot summary. PacificBoy 23:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  H.G. = Herbert 

message: In the first paragraph of this article, it is indicated that Nicholas Meyer and Karl Alexander are the same person. Is this true? I've listened to the audio commentary on the film by Nicholas Meyer, and he mentions Karl Alexander as an actual person he knows who agreed to write the book. Why would he have reason to lie about this information? Are there any sources that indicate Karl Alexander to be a pseudonym for Meyer?
Pacific1982 17:26, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't Karl Alexander a real person? 

message: :Image:Time after time.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Time after time.jpg

message: :Image:Timeaftertime.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Timeaftertime.jpg

message: Is it worth mentioning that McDowell and Steenburgen met on this film, fell in love, and married (each other)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.172.240.8 (talk) 00:18, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that information is suitable for their own articles, but here it's just trivia. MovieMadness (talk) 12:49, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  McDowell and Steenburgen 

message: You will see Exorcist IV (stylized as "EXORCIST IV") advertised in Ghirardelli Square about 57m into the movie, but only Exorcist II had so far been release in 1977. This seems like some sort of joke about E3 in 78 and E4 in 79. Did any director notes about this exist? 184.145.18.191 (talk) 00:20, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The joke got a huge laugh in 1979, when sequels were uncommon. Godfather II (1974) was considered an extraordinary exception. Nobody imagined multiple sequels in those days. Rozsaphile1 (talk) 00:36, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't remember laughing.  There were relatively few numbered sequels in the 1970s (except in the last few years of the decade), but a fair number of franchise movies, such as eleven "official" James Bond movies plus one semi-unofficial Bond movie released by 1979.  Anyway, in the science-fiction movie Spaceballs, there's a joke about "Rocky 2000" (meaning the two-thousandth movie)... AnonMoos (talk) 05:23, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Exorcist 4]]