Talk:Bella Coola

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: No consensus, not moved  DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:06, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
===Comment on close===
A full sets of stats and googles pointing to the town as PRIMARYTOPIC, and only one disssenting vote that is made up of suggestions that heli-skiing company named for the town, and Bella Coola Valley, which isn't even an article, are possible PRIMARYTOPICS, an irrelevant nostrum about the small size of the town, and suggestions that items with different titles are competing PRIMARYTOPICS.  Stats/googles vs specious logic and no evidence pointing to any other title - and this was called "no consensus, not moved"??  This should have been at least relisted, if not closed with an eye to the stats provided and the shallow and unsubstantiated claims in the sole oppose vote.Skookum1 (talk) 08:25, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

text: When I said "you can add Bella Coola Valley and Bella Coola Heliskiing to the topics with lots of web hits among those you counted," I certainly did not mean to suggest a possible primarytopic.  I'm sorry you misread me.  I don't see this as an issue of competing primarytopics.  No primarytopic is a better outcome.  Dicklyon (talk) 16:18, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: For you, given your lack of geographic competence re Canadian locations, perhaps.  Why did you even bother to posit impossible/inviable candidates then?  "no primarytopic is a better outcome" belies the FACT that there is a PRIMARYTOPIC for the stand-alone term "Bella Coola", and the suggestions that differently-titled article Nuxalk and Nuxalk language are candidates is totally contrary to disambiguation rules/parameters.  Your speciousness and wikilawyering on all these dabs, given you don't know anything about these places or their profile on the landscape, is rather breathtaking in its gall.Skookum1 (talk) 06:17, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I really wish that I'd discovered this proposal earlier. This has, I think, done a disservice to the clarity of this article, and its reflection of the reality. "Bella Coola" is the entire valley. However, this may be able to be rectified with some edits to the disambiguation page. I'm going to try. AshleyMorton (talk) 12:27, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: A full sets of stats and googles pointing to the town as PRIMARYTOPIC, and only one disssenting vote that is made up of suggestions that heli-skiing company named for the town, and Bella Coola Valley, which isn't even an article, are possible PRIMARYTOPICS, an irrelevant nostrum about the small size of the town, and suggestions that items with different titles are competing PRIMARYTOPICS.  Stats/googles vs specious logic and no evidence pointing to any other title - and this was called "no consensus, not moved"??  This should have been at least relisted, if not closed with an eye to the stats provided and the shallow and unsubstantiated claims in the sole oppose vote.Skookum1 (talk) 08:25, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: When I said "you can add Bella Coola Valley and Bella Coola Heliskiing to the topics with lots of web hits among those you counted," I certainly did not mean to suggest a possible primarytopic.  I'm sorry you misread me.  I don't see this as an issue of competing primarytopics.  No primarytopic is a better outcome.  Dicklyon (talk) 16:18, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: For you, given your lack of geographic competence re Canadian locations, perhaps.  Why did you even bother to posit impossible/inviable candidates then?  "no primarytopic is a better outcome" belies the FACT that there is a PRIMARYTOPIC for the stand-alone term "Bella Coola", and the suggestions that differently-titled article Nuxalk and Nuxalk language are candidates is totally contrary to disambiguation rules/parameters.  Your speciousness and wikilawyering on all these dabs, given you don't know anything about these places or their profile on the landscape, is rather breathtaking in its gall.Skookum1 (talk) 06:17, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I really wish that I'd discovered this proposal earlier. This has, I think, done a disservice to the clarity of this article, and its reflection of the reality. "Bella Coola" is the entire valley. However, this may be able to be rectified with some edits to the disambiguation page. I'm going to try. AshleyMorton (talk) 12:27, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment on close