Talk:Chinese

message: Is this a good or bad edit? I don't know much about Chinese politics, so is this vandalism, political bias, or a good edit? — Stevey7788 (talk) 21:16, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Anon's edit

message: The link correction has been put here as it is needed for making corrections.  (Sloman 19:29, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Link correction aid

message: I replaced the link to Japanese controversial term on Chinese. Regarded as derogatory by many, avoided being used by Japanese government, that word shouldn't be linked to this page. please do not this sneaky things here again.  --Yau 12:29, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese derogatory term 

message: I think this statement is false as it currently is written:
"An exception is that the term is usually understood to be Standard Cantonese, when used in the special administrative regions of Hong Kong and Macau in the People's Republic of China."
Andyohio 11:18, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cantonese / Chinese 

message: Therefore WP:NAD is not relavent, at least for this term and all terms associated with China.  "zh.wikipedia.org" is also blocked.  My material about translation was not what you would find in a typical English dictionary.  It was just aimed at making the term less ambiguous when speaking to a person from mainland China.  
The meaning of Chinese (and the related terms in other languages) should vary whether you are talking to someone from Taiwan, mainland China, Macau, S.Korea, N. Korea, Vietnam, Mongolia.  Andyohio 12:18, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No access to Wictionary in China....  

message: #Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 19:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Support

message: #Oppose.  Chinese is a disambig page that includes all pages that are "Chinese..."; Chinese people is for Chinese people.  This seems fairly straightforward.  Badagnani 20:04, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Oppose

message: The edits that were made to change the disambiguation page (not by me) were a positive step in cleanup for WP:MOS-DAB, so I have reimplemented some of them. Although the page still has several entries that have too many links, the link to Chinese culture should not be near the top of the page as it was before. WP:MOS-DAB states that we should "list other entries of which Title is a part in a "See also" section unless the subject is very frequently referred to simply by the single name." The word Chinese, as a noun, does not generally refer to the culture (this is usually "the culture of China" or "Chinese culture"),  unlike the noun uses of the term for the language, people, and cuisine. The see also section is a useful workaround for people who are looking for a more specific topic (see Japanese for another example of this), but we are supposed to be talking about noun forms of the words for the main links at the top of the page. Dekimasuよ! 05:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The removal of much useful information in the name of "cleanup" does not seem to be helpful.  As changes to this page have been the subject of some debate, please go over each proposed change (particularly the big ones) here so that we can see that edits are being made in a deliberate, judicious, and thoughtful manner that all can agree on.  Badagnani 05:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After another review I see that some of the changes that were made were unhelpful, as you suggested. (I had to go back and take out links that weren't in the page before his edits, not noticing that he had added them). I propose to keep your version (with cuisine moved to the top), but have culture moved back to the bottom and have the see also section constitued as in the new edit. Dekimasuよ! 06:00, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Ah. Also, the link should be readded to Chinese people now that we have taken the disambiguation tag off of that page. Dekimasuよ! 06:01, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup of the dab page 

message: I don't think this edit is correct, because I don't think hanja or any of the others is called "Chinese." Badagnani 23:09, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That depends on who you ask I think.  I'm neutral to whether or not we should include these mentions, but for example, "hanja" and "kanji" just translates as "Chinese characters" in their respective languages.  Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 00:45, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions 

message: Hello. I'm an editor in the above article.
*It is known that the White Russians tried to "blame" the Chinese for the Revolution and Civil War. Trotsky made fun of that, for example.
*An editor presented the Reference below as the 1st authority on the matter.
*Can anyone please help explain this source? Is it reliable, or is it propaganda of the time? Does anyone know anything about the author?
*Is it true that the Chinese played a notable or significant role in the Russian Revolution and Civil War (1917-1920)?
     Пын Мин. История китайско-советской дружбы. М., 1959.
     (Peng Ming, "History of the Chinese-Russian Frienship",
     translation from Chinese, Moscow, Sotsekgiz, 1959,
     original: "Zhong-su yu she", Pekin, 1957 (Russian)
Thank you.
:Yours truly, --Ludvikus 11:51, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Chinese in the Russian Revolution and Chinese in the Russian Civil War]] 

message: There are 5000 years of Chinese history and culture and I cannot believe there is so little information given, There are many things that can be added in the passage.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamnotdead (talk • contribs) 06:19, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions