lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Agha (title)

message: There is someting wrong with the text to the second picture. King Sheikh Mahmoud reffered to lived during the 1920s not 1820s. I would belive the picture is reffering to someone else and not King Sheikh Mahmoud since the picture semes to be older than the 1920s, so the dating of 1820 may be correct but it is reffering to someone else.
:::Reply: He is not King Mahmoud of southern Kurdistan in 1920s but Mahmoud Pasha of Baban dynasty who ruled over Slemani principality 1813-1834. Sharishirin 07:36, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture text 

message: Seeing that the Turkic and Mongolian words share a common origin, we understand that Turkish language got the word from Old Turkic naturally; and the Old Turkic word, along with its Mongolian cognate, has its origins in the Proto-Altaic root. So I'm gonna make an etymology section and describe the matter there. --Chapultepec 19:47, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:46, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:State income tax

message: I'm dropping a potential source here because I think it has information that will work well in this article. It presents data that shows how different levels of taxation are driving migration within the United States. 
:https://www.moneygeek.com/financial-planning/resources/tax-friendly-state/
Please let me know if you have any questions. SBCornelius (talk) 19:34, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see WP:EDITXY. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:00, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potentially useful source 

message: In Section 6 of the article, it seems that someone set out to provide state-by-state details, but didn't get very far.  State-by-state details are now provided in the large table.  Should Section 6 be deleted?  Spike-from-NH (talk) 22:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[State income tax#Rates by jurisdiction|Rates by jurisdiction]]
Talk:Espiye

message: == Etymology ==
This does not make sense.  The people knew where they lived.  They lived there.  Does this word slient mean silent?  What is a silent place.  Please correct this page.  Thanks!--al95521 06:56, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: This does not make sense.  The people knew where they lived.  They lived there.  Does this word slient mean silent?  What is a silent place.  Please correct this page.  Thanks!--al95521 06:56, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 
Talk:Tirebolu

message: Are the coordinates correct for this town? Looking at Google Maps, I see there is a much larger community to the East named "Tirebolu" at 41° 0' 29" N, 38° 50' 56". (The current coordinates may better fit the site of ancient Tripolis (Pontus). -- llywrch (talk) 19:33, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:A Deadly Secret

message: The list of characters is very simple and missing a lot of details. I think we can do something similar to what has already been done to the page on The Smiling, Proud Wanderer. 
I have created a new page at List of characters in A Deadly Secret. Do feel free to add to it. 
(Thanks to User:Redclifffan for pointing out my errors in my previous edit)
Newfraferz87 (talk) 13:10, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion to the list of characters
Talk:Jackie Coogan

message: Seems to me there should be some mention of the Coogan Law which was passed as a result of little Jackie's experiences. He made a fortune as a child actor, but his parents' controlled all the money, which they squandered, so there was nothing left by the time he came of age. That's why the law was passed. It keep 15% of the child actors' earnings in trust until he is 21. --Graceful1 15:30, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And Trivia it ain't. Macgruder 16:28, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It looks like a great deal had been deleted, so I retrieved some of it. However the stuff I retrieved may not be entirely neutral and therefore needs looked at.--T. Anthony 07:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coogan Law 

message: In the right hand column, Jackie Coogan's birthplace is listed as Woburn, Massachusetts and yet every source I've seen, including the info in the main article states that he was born in L.A. I don't know how to edit/correct this box.
User:elshano  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elshano1 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace 

message: "Jackie Coogan has his hand and foot prints in concrete out front of Grauman's Chinese Theater (now Mann's Chinese Theater), Ceremony #19, on December 12, 1931..." — Mistake? Because Ceremony #19, December 12, 1931 — Jackie Cooper. Jackie doesn't have footprints here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bukimoner (talk • contribs) 17:24, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The paragraph discussing hand and foot prints in concrete has been incompetently edited, multiple times, with rhetorical statements added.  I can't make any sense of it whatsoever.  If the information can't be verified and referenced, I suggest that the entire paragraph be removed from the article.—QuicksilverT @ 19:43, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hand and foot prints in concrete? 

message: "Coogan's mother and stepfather claimed Jackie was having fun and thought he was playing."
"... thought he was playing." ?????  Huh?????Daqu (talk) 17:49, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: In other words, he wasn't knowingly doing a job of work in exchange for money. Valetude (talk) 17:28, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this sentence supposed to mean? 

message: A lot of actors from that era that enlisted for World War 2 have a brief summary of their military service in the bio. See, for instance, Steve McQueen, Humphrey Bogart, James Stewart, Clark Gable and many other contemporaries. 147.161.149.89 (talk) 22:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military service in bio
Talk:Agulhas Current

message: I suggest the following:
Add the synonym: Agulhas Current—(Also called Agulhas stream.)
Update swift and strong with: It is one of the swiftest ocean currents with mean speeds of 1.6 m s−1 and peak speeds exceeding 2.5 m s−1.    Its total transport of 70 Sv (70 × 106 m3s−1) near 31°S and up to 135 Sv (135 × 106 m3s−1) near 35°S is also among the largest of all ocean currents.
Reference: [http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/search?id=agulhas-current1
]
The following image might also be useful to show the proximity of this current to the coastline for the generation of electricity.
The article [http://www.agu.org/eos_elec/000440e.shtml
] indicates a distance of about 1° (in km?) from the coastline.
Ctmalan 15:30, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggwationas

message: I don't understand the use of 'reticulated' (networked) in the statement The sources of the Agulhas Current are the East Madagascar Current, the Mozambique Current and a reticulated part of the Agulhas Current itself.  Surely this should be 'recirculated' as stated 2 paragraphs later.  Autodidactyl (talk) 07:37, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Autodidactyl: Actually, the source said recirculated. Fama Clamosa (talk) 11:12, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Reticulated current

message: Vorticity and momentum are really the same thing expressed in different coordinates; both are the first moment of motion. The problem can always be recast in generalized coordinates, but this is not the most practical solution, as Hough has shown. Momentum is absolutely conserved -- Lagrange's formulation implies that momentum "friction" does not exist! Energy has other forms but momentum does not! Relative vorticity is not the same thing as the total  vorticity, which is relevant in western boundary current dynamics. The idea is that as TV changes it appears as changing RV and also as changes in steric potential at different latitudes. Such changes alter the solid earth's momentum, but not the earth-ocean-wind combined momentum. The Chandler Wobble is a good example of the ocean-earth momentum cycle. The NET transport should not include recirculation (reticulated part), as it probably varies a lot in  the short term. It is not part of the gyre regime.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.219.70.254 (talk) 06:52, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor Physics 

message: a mariner once mentioned to me that  ships use this current to save time and fuel - does anyone have a reference for this ?--— ⦿⨦⨀Tumadoireacht Talk/Stalk 22:43, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ships using it
Talk:Beylik of Teke

message: *"Beylik of Teke" -Llc (any language) - 0
*"Principality of Teke" -Llc 8, Houtsma used "Principality of Teke-eli"
*"Teke Principality" -Llc 4
Takabeg (talk) 02:40, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Haroun and the Sea of Stories

message: The section on characters (and other sections to a degree) has been vandalized several times. The characters should be double checked to make sure they are consistent with the book and to provide a base references for vandal watchers in the future. Thanks! WDavis1911 04:35, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Characters

message: It seems as if this plot summary is far too detailed for the purposes of the Wikipedia. We should condense it. Bc.rox.all (talk) 18:02, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary 
Talk:Lonesome Traveler

message: so i (not logged in for some reason) just deleted this section that'd been there for about 18 months. i thought including the actual sketches contained in the book was more important than a fairly open to interpretation/npov/OR selection of ideas. if anyone feels strongly about it though, feel free to put it back in a different form, or bring it up on my talk page, or something. Hysteria18 (talk) 19:26, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "implications/revelations"
Talk:West Cheshire College

message: That last edit was a lot closer.  I don't have the sources to rewrite it myself, but here's what I suggest:
*Make sure that the paragraph is entirely factual, with none of your own opinion inserted.
*Don't put it at the beginning of the article- place it nearer to the end, since it's information about the school but not the most important, defining information.
*Include a link to a newspaper story or other source about the discrimination case and its resolution.
I have this page on my watchlist, and I'd be glad to help you tweak it so it includes the relevant information while staying neutral and citing sources.  -FisherQueen 15:39, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it twice more today. One case does not make for "a history of disability discrimination." In addition, the statement on that single case requires a citation to stay in the article. If the editor behind this provides a citation, I'll have no objection to leaving it in the article. | Mr. Darcy talk 16:14, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And... we have a winner!  I have no problem with the paragraph as recently revised- it is specific to the incident it describes, and it includes a source. -FisherQueen 17:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We need a specific citation for this - the title of the article, the name of the article's author, etc. The name of the plaintiff and the nature of his disability would also be useful. | Mr. Darcy talk 20:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Look, it's community working as it's supposed to - taking the article from ridiculously biased to ridiculously benign to factua. -Patstuarttalk|edits 20:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

text: If you have an agenda to publicise your negative opinion of this collage, then you should not edit this article. Start a blog. Wikipedia is not a soapbox.--Docg 18:35, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: On disability discrimination

message: This article remains a stub as there are no independent references. Work should be done to sort out the references- then convert all the lists to prose.--ClemRutter (talk) 17:26, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Mudcrutch

message: Anybody know where I can get more info on that live thing--Feeling free (talk) 20:21, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Live album 

message: It seems contradictory to me to list the band's second activity date as "2007-present" in the infobox and refer to a "2008 reunion" in the body of the article, hence my changing it. Colinclarksmith (talk) 00:10, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And the album was recorded in 2007... but the chapter heading is "2008 return," so I see where you're coming from.  Fair enough.  Colinclarksmith (talk) 00:12, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reformation year 

message: In the personnel section, the article lists Jim Lenahan as the lead vocalist, although the prose of the article never mentions him at all.  Why is this?  When did he leave the band?  What happened to him?  Being the lead vocalist, we should at least mention him at some point.  Dismas|(talk) 01:17, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, there's no source on Lenahan.  Where is this info coming from?  This could be an act of vandalism.... unless someone can source this, mentions of Lenahan should be deleted.70.27.2.187 (talk) 03:36, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Jim Lenahan quit as lead vocalist and became stage manager for the band, he has been and might still be The Heartbreakers lighting designer http://jlpd.com/. Just saw this in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runnin'_Down_a_Dream. I bet there existst even better sources for this--217.14.5.140 (talk) 22:23, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jim Lenahan 

message: The entry has been edited to show all members as 'former members' and they may very well totally disband due to Tom Petty's death, but as of the time of this writing, this has not been officially announced or definitively established. The entry should not be altered based on assumptions. Clearly 'Tom Petty & The Heartbreakers' died with Petty, but Mudcrutch is a different situation. (Sellpink (talk) 17:52, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Mudcrutch disbanded
Talk:Rapana venosa

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Rapana venosa 01.JPG will be appearing as picture of the day on December 1, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-12-01. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:53, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Rapana venosa 01.JPG]] to appear as POTD
Talk:Survival Island

message: I don't think the plot section is accurate (Just saw the movie for the second time last night). They aren't having an affair when her husband shows up, they've simply bonded... the two men act like two men tend to do, fighting and being jerks until ultimately Manuel basically rapes Jennifer, causing Jack to hate them both and turn into a murderous sorta guy. The way the article is now it sounds like he was a villain from the beginning and that Jennifer had already forgotten about him for Manuel (i.e. having an affair rather than rejecting his friendly advances). Shrug, it's just a dumb movie on Showtime, but accuracy is a good thing.
:Fixed all the wrong or made up details in the synopsis. --Kumagoro-42 (talk) 03:46, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

message: I removed the poisonous reef fish language because it is simply not true.  People have survived for thousands of years eating off of the reefs of the South Pacific.  In fact I personally ate reef fish for a year an a half during a Peace Corps stint, and never suffered from ciguatoxin poisoning.  That is not to say that ciguatoxin is not a danger, just that it does not occur universally on all reefs, in all fish, all throughout the year.  Furthermore the poisoning is rarely deadly, and is mostly related to the eating of fish from heavily polluted areas.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leisz77 (talk • contribs) 22:51, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: poisonous reef fish 

message: I have removed the line "incrdibly hot beach-rape sex as it is not needed at all. All we need to know is that they had sex on the beach.Wild ste (talk) 17:24, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Phrase not necessary
Talk:Marine current power

message: I suggest that we find a better name for this alternative energy source: Tidal Stream? (refering to [Tidal "wind farms" ].)
The power available in the Agulhas Ocean Stream is immense. The velocity is about 2 m s-1, with a volume of 70 × 106 m3 s-1 .  And this is within ?? km of the coastline.  (A formula with an answer in TW maybe?) The reference to the Mozambique Current in the table next to [South African] and othe relavent stuff can then be moved to this page! Ctmalan 15:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: : not moved. Station1 (talk) 05:42, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Marine current power → Kinetic hydro energy conversion system  —
see http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4613279.html
Would place article in line with other article as wind energy conversion system, ...
Clearifies that this is a type of hydro energy conversion system.
KVDP (talk) 09:12, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Particular patented process ? No, not at all, marine current power is always a form of kinetic energy harvesting, combined with hydro energy conversion system makes kinetic hydro energy conversion system. Indeed it isn't used much to refer to the devices, but it is accurate and not a "patented process"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.245.79.87 (talk) 10:52, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The suggested title is registered as  United States Patent 4613279 ... which would make it advertising, since it is the basis of this pagemove request. 76.66.197.30 (talk) 03:52, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: The current version mainly duplicates tidal power, which has nothing to do with marine current power. I suggest we remove such information and make this article point more on the intended topic; power from ocean currents. If no one disagrees, I will carry out the task in about a weeks time. Kind regards. Rehman(+) 08:27, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: Tethys is not a reference it is a library of different sources. correct reference 3 is: Saad, Fouad. The Shock of Energy Transition. Partridge Publishing Singapore, 2016.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.112.173.209 (talk) 22:57, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 3
Talk:The Headless Horseman (novel)

message: Not quite sure if this can be called an "American novel". It may have been based on a story the author heard or saw in Texas, but he had not lived in the US since at least the beginning of the Civil War, if I understand correctly. It was a novel about Texas, written by a Scott while he was in Ireland - since this was during the time of the Union, I suppose that makes it British? I have lived in Texas all my life and never heard of this.--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 01:38, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Category talk:Roman frontiers

message: List of all pages in category Roman frontiers retrieved by PockBot.PockBot is currently Undergoing Trials. If you have any comments on its performance please leave them at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/PockBotArticleClass / StatusAntonine WallStartCelemantiaStubGask RidgeStubHadrian's WallBLimesStartLimes ArabicusStubLimes GermanicusBMeroënot yet classifiedRoman Dacianot yet classifiedRoman military frontiers and fortificationsStartArbeianot yet classifiedBirdoswald Fortnot yet classifiedBroad Wallnot yet classifiedCarvorannot yet classifiedCorbridgenot yet classifiedHadrian's Wall Pathnot yet classifiedHousesteadsnot yet classifiedMaryportnot yet classifiedMilecastleStubMilecastle 51not yet classifiedSegedunum Roman Fortnot yet classifiedStanegatenot yet classifiedVindolandaStartWallsendnot yet classifiedCount of the Saxon Shorenot yet classifiedDux Britanniarumnot yet classifiedSaxon Shore Waynot yet classifiedBurgh Castlenot yet classifiedCaistor St. Edmundnot yet classifiedDubrisnot yet classifiedPevensey Castlenot yet classifiedPortchester Castlenot yet classifiedRutupiaenot yet classifiedSaxon Shore Fortsnot yet classifiedPockBot 09:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  PockBot - Category articles summary as of 9:13:42, Thu Dec 7, 2006
Talk:Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy

message: Hello,
I wish you are fine,
guys this article contains some images that are disrespectful for us,
Please I really would like you to be comprehensive and delete them
Thank you for being comprehensive and kind
Sincerely Usernetme (talk) 22:26, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: See the template at the top of the page, which links to previous discussions of this issue. You can also configure your browser not to show the images.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 22:38, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

text: Also read WP:NOTCENSORED. Some1 (talk) 23:12, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

text: No. 106.128.97.210 (talk) 05:35, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal of removing an inappropriate content 

message: > They presented a dossier containing the twelve cartoons from the Jyllands-Posten, and other depictions of Muhammad alongside them, some real and some fake, including one where they claimed he was portrayed as a pig, seen as forbidden and unclean in Islam
Was the pig picture a real one? This sentence is unclear, please clarify 185.109.254.170 (talk) 18:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The picture was real but had nothing to do with Muhammad. Additional details may be found at Akkari-Laban dossier#Experts' view. Favonian (talk) 18:17, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  unclear sentence 

message: Our article on Danish pastries has a section on this controversy, as there was a brief campaign to rename the pastries in protest. I am proposing that the section should be deleted, because it is too trivial a detail for an understanding of the baking tradition. But it may not be trivial for an understanding of the cartoon controversy. So if any of you who are working here want to copy that over from there to here (in whole or part), this might be the time to do it. Doric Loon (talk) 18:11, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: And I have just noticed that in 2006 there was some discussion of this already, but not a decision (see archive 22). Anyway, I'm not active here, so I'll leave it to those of you who are. Doric Loon (talk) 18:18, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danish pastries
Talk:Attacking Faulty Reasoning

message: I have a paperback copy of this book, however I noticed that there is an extra criterion ("structurally well-formed"). I must have an edition previous to #5.  indicates that the 5th edition is where this new criterion appears.
--Glork2718 16:22, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The first paragraph says: "Attacking Faulty Reasoning is a textbook on logical fallacies by T. Edward Damer that has been used for many years in a number of college courses on logic, critical thinking, argumentation, and philosophy". Is there a way to prove this? Enisbayramoglu (talk) 11:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliability