lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jody Gibson

message: A common misconception Miss Gibson was never a prostitute; but rather  the "brains" behind the operation.
This the worst article I've ever read on Wikipedia and should be deleted as irrelevant,not sufficiently noteworthy.Jm127 (talk) 21:42, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've attempted a general rewrite of the article to take out the promotional nonsense.  I think NPOV should not be a problem for the article in its current form.
What I think the article needs is not only work on improving the citations, but double-checking the facts that are currently there.  I see in the article history that  is one of the people who has contributed significantly to this article, and it's hard to tell where reality ends and fantasy begins.  If anyone has the energy to go through with a fine tooth comb and vet the claims that are already there, I think it would help a lot. Tim Pierce (talk) 15:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: The IMDB link of her movie or whatever it is, gives a "Page not found" error. How can it be possible? They remove titles? 85.217.45.223 (talk) 02:50, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMDB link
Talk:Antônia (film)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
----
:Antônia →  – not a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC per page views  Joeykai (talk) 15:25, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 November 2021
Talk:Wheel of Time (film)

message: This article is ridiculously naive. Herzog and the Dalai Lama are both extraordinarily complex individuals with complex motives for the things that they do publicly. It's a shame that the article does little more than make a vague gesture in the direction of explaining the content of the film. The Dalai Lama is clearly interested in reinforcing his international reputation as a way of keeping his enemies at a distance, and Herzog is interested in seeing how the Dalai Lama maintains the constructs of the personal mythology that surrounds him in disparate milieu. Herzog's films demand much more from an audience than a set of preconceived notions to be played on by the director.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 (talk) 20:54, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can expand and improve the description, go for it. Not sure what you mean with your last sentence- the description in the article now doesn't really present any "notions" at all. It's just a bare-bones description of some stuff that's in the movie. If you can include some deeper commentary from reliable sources that would help out a lot. Staecker (talk) 02:35, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naive
Talk:Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization

message: According to a recent Japanese TV programme there is a hospital in Tokyo that is using TACE on throat, oesphageal, and metastased bone cancers. The doctor is good at getting to any part of the body via the arteries and injecting chemotherapeutic drugs near to cancer to dry and kill it and the blood vessels supplying it. From the examples shown the technique seemed to be semi-palliative but combined well with surgery. According to an internet search there is also a professor in Frankfurt.--Timtak 05:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tumours in other areas of the body

message: Can someone knowledgeable in this subject fix the "midgets wear pink underwear"? --Yarakot (talk) 23:43, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: years and years ago im sure BakerStMD T|C 01:03, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism?

message: Quoting from the beginning of the article -
"In the west, the most common causes are alcoholic and viral (hepatitis C) hepatitis. The standard treatment for HCC is surgical resection, which has a 60% 5-year survival. In cases of unresectable tumor or marginal liver function, the current treatment of choice is orthotopic liver transplantation. Due to the scarcity of organ donors and to the multiple comorbidities these patients have, many die while on the transplant list.
TACE also has a role in delaying the progression of HCC until a donor liver becomes available."
- From the paragraph 1 it is implied that TACE is a better option than the ones mentioned. The implication is not clear... and without stating it clearly the article moves on to explain what TACE _also_ playes a role for. Is TACE actually better option than the ones described in the first paragraph mentioned above? If so the following line inserted might clear the confusion - "TACE does not have the above mentioned complications". I am not inserting it since I am not knowledgeable in the subject. I will do research online, but it will be good if someone knowledgeable qualifies mode.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hirak 99 (talk • contribs) 19:01, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Implication not clear
Talk:I Wonder Who's Killing Her Now?

message: Please could someone better place the movie pictures on the page as it looks kind of messed up on my browser! Who played who in this movie? The Bela Lugosi character, il duce etc? 
Corrected some of the infobox Dianetics44 06:13, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Please
Talk:Dar ul-Funun (Persia)

message: Could someone please confirm and state that Dar ul-Funum was (is?) in Teheran. Fritz@Joern.De
:Dar al-Fonun was "merged into" Tehran University. This is stated in the Dehkhoda's dictionary and in Encyclopedia Iranica:--Zereshk 18:19, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Alphonzo Bell

message: The header statement " The westside Los Angeles residential community of Bel Air is named after him." is not substantiated by the text.  The fact that he founded it does not give the origin of the name. Chemical Engineer (talk) 21:38, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of Bel-Air 

message: I don't know why the info about the racial covenant to Bell's land donation is here, considering that it was boilerplate usage in deeds in those days. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 20:01, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racial covenant in deed 

message: Obviously his family came to America from somewhere. We would like to know where. 2600:1700:8D40:BA10:C5D3:7A3:6791:1ADA (talk) 16:17, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where did his family migrate to America from?
Talk:Ability to swim

message: Should mention that babies instinctively(?) hold their breath under water and can stand water rather comfortably. Usually this ability is lost unless it is reinforced.--Lionelbrits 21:50, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Babies 

message: in ability to swim:
"To stay afloat in water, very little action is needed; the human body is slightly more dense than the water. "
And in swimming:
"Roughly, 70% of the body is water; while the lungs are filled with the air, the body is slightly less dense than the surrounding water, which exerts a buoyant force on it. "
Which is correct? Wolfmankurd 13:52, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your question. I asked my biology prof about the question, and he said that "Roughly, 70% of the body is water; while the lungs are filled with the air, the body is slightly less dense than the surrounding water, which exerts a buoyant force on it. " is the true statement. Thank you for bringing it up, and I will personally make sure that the information is changed in the incorect article. --wpktsfs 19:13, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: I see that someone has suggested a merge with swimming. Indeed, the "ability to swim" should be merged into the article "swimming." This would make it uniform with the running article. Much of the "running" article is focused on the ability of animals (including humans, of course) to run. I think that this entry should be deleted and its contect merged into the "swimming," a process that would add uniformity to the articles of this nature on Wikipedia. ask123 21:10, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Per the comments above, I am merging Ability to swim into Swimming --Lox (t,c) 21:38, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with '''''[[Swimming]]'''''
Talk:Kuchlug

message: Is Kushluk an alternate spelling of Kuchlug? 24.58.43.38 (talk) 20:07, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe so, but I haven't searched for sources to verify. - Imperator Talk 11:11, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Küçlüg means "powerful" in Turkish (Güçlü in modern Turkish). Böri (talk) 10:48, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Küçlüg
Talk:Lee Sedol versus Hong Chang-sik ladder game

message: Does anyone know a good way to add game kifu data in the correct wiki format
without having to type all the moves in manually? Talyian 06:15, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Diagram creation has been discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Go. Charles Matthews 16:22, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Got bored and converted, easy enough to script. - Not signed in 14:26, 24 Apr 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Risto Krle

message: Hi,
This must be a mistake: "He wrote many plays during the First Balkan War and until the Second Balkan War"?? Either he was born some time earlier, or, more likely, his plays are SET during the Balkan Wars (when the author was 12-13 years old).
Quatrocentu 06:18, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wil & Lehmo

message: This article should not be deleted as it forms part of the other articles related to the radio network Triple M and national radio programs broadcasted in Australia.  The program had taken over from a high rated and popular afternoon show The Shebang.  The other related radio shows are Get This, The Cage.  
The host of this program is a well known radio personality - Wil Anderson and has been a host of a national radio show on Triple J and a host on a national TV show The Glass House.  Within the next few days, I am sure more information will be added to the article and more media and information is released on air and in the media.--Mikecraig 06:30, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  re: Deletion 

message: ````Stickman, May 14th 2008````
Triple M's Will & Lehmo show, sponsored by Holden, are giving away a new Holden VE SSV Commodore Ute to the listener who can correctly guess the ten items that the DJs have placed in the back.
Details of this competitiobn can be found at the official site. http://www.triplem.com.au/melbourne/shows/willehmo/features/holdenute.html
For each of the ten items that the winner will need to correctly identify, there is both an on-air clue given by the presenter each weekday afternoon between 4pm and 6pm AEST.
Additional online clues are posted on the official website (see link above)
Please post on-air clues here...
Item 1:
Onair clue: (not recorded yet)
Online clue: "Gee's I look better for reading it"
Item 2:
Onair clue: (not recorded yet)
Online clue: "Lucky Skaifey used permanent marker on it"
Item 3:
Onair clue: "I'm getting hot going around in circles all the time"
Online clue: "I'm sick of going round in circles"
Item 4:
Onair clue: (not released yet)
Online clue: (not released yet)
Item 5:
Onair clue: (not released yet)
Online clue: (not released yet)
Item 6:
Onair clue: (not released yet)
Online clue: (not released yet)
Item 7:
Onair clue: (not released yet)
Online clue: (not released yet)
Item 8:
Onair clue: (not released yet)
Online clue: (not released yet)
Item 9:
Onair clue: (not released yet)
Online clue: (not released yet)
Item 10:
Onair clue: (not released yet)
Online clue: (not released yet)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.220.66.130 (talk) 22:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ute giveaway competition clues
Talk:Bruce Grube

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.usg.edu/news/release/grube_named_president_of_georgia_southern_university/. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MLauba (Talk) 10:34, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Mihri Hatun

message: This article needed some help. The one source link was dead and very little was actually cited. I rewrote the biography and added citations to that as well as the poems referenced as well as providing more links to various articles in Wiki.Himeyuri (talk) 14:13, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:User c++-4

message: Weell, that's a little rude. Wouldn't a redirect be a bit less invasive? Adam McCormick 06:41, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Mostly because there are a lot of people who use this template and it's much less invasive to have a redirect here not a "This template shoould be somewhere else." almost every other language uses this format so if nothing else this page should remain a redirect for uniformity's sake. The change was also not discussed or justified after the same change was reverted several weeks ago. Adam McCormick 06:06, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Where would you expect me to discuss the change?  Are you aware of Wikipedia:Userbox migration?  "People are periodically running bots that update people's userpages to point from the old location in template space to the new location in userspace" (WP:UM).  --Iamunknown 06:17, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Not that it matters now but the Userbox Migration is not a policy and in fasct is under serious criticism from the community on whole. As Jimbo himself has said he didn't [intend] to make any decree or rule regarding userboxes, their mass deletion or their migration to User space. The only consensus seems to be that User boxes should not be Inflamatory or show POV. You should not refuse to discuss something because someone cannot respond immediately, wikipedia lives or dies by consensus.  Adam McCormick 15:48, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Lycianthes

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Lycianthes rantonnetii.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on October 26, 2010. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2010-10-26. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 17:06, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Lycianthes rantonnetii.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: I find this section somewhat opaque. Normlly it would be used to describe the physical characteristics that species within the genus have in common. Morphology, reproduction, etc. Darorcilmir (talk) 21:59, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Characteristics section
Talk:Larson's Book of World Religions and Alternative Spirituality

message: If you check out the author Bob Larson's article you will see that this is one out of the many he has written on the same themes.  Article has no secondary sources so redirecting to Bob Larson.  This should not be controversial. Thoughtmonkey (talk) 20:43, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Ethical subjectivism

message: In contemporary parlance, shouldn't the point be made this way: subjectivism as a metaethical doctrine is neutral between particularism and generalism, or perhaps between contextualism and absolutism?  I realize that Brandt uses the term "relativism" to mean "contextualism" in the quoted source, and the sense of "relativism" is clearly defined (more or less) in the current Wikipedia article, but "relativism" just seems like the wrong term to use here, especially since this is not the sense of relativism that dominates the Wikipedia article on moral relativism.  -- SCPhilosopher 20:26, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  compatibility of subjectivism with "absolutism" and "relativism" 

message: I'm taking out the reference to Jack Bauer; he's clearly more of a extreme anti-deontological consequentialist, not a subjectivist, so the reference is misleading.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.230.88.80 (talk) 02:03, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and as evidence I offer the way he tortured that Arabic guy for information about where the nuclear bomb was being hidden. --70.131.60.45 (talk) 09:36, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jack Bauer 

message: I can understand how subjectivism can refer to a number of theories. However, there isn't enough material here to clarify how subjectivism is a type of theory and individualist subjectivism is a token, or to explain the difference between the latter and any other token. The two articles appear identical.
I propose a merge of the two articles, plus a short description of any other token. 94.195.129.111 (talk) 22:44, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and done. --Pfhorrest (talk) 01:11, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individualist ethical subjectivism 

message: The definitions of and relationship between relativism and subjectivism seems to vary by source, sometimes even within the same source. ZFT (talk) 00:55, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: In the senses used as the topics of our articles here, ethical subjectivism can differ from relativism in the case where a unique universal subject is the referent of moral propositions, such as in divine command theory or ideal observer theory. They are semantically ethical subjectivism because they hold ethical propositions to refer to the attitudes or commands of God or the Ideal Observer, but because in either case that subject is singular and unchanging they remain substantially universalism, not relativist. --Pfhorrest (talk) 07:12, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vs. relativism: conflicting definitions in multiple sources
Talk:I Want a New Drug

message: it was a top ten song and as such, deserves to stay!  172.148.114.145 12:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep this article 

message: I removed the following under the lawsuit section.
“With the fact that the "Ghostbusters" single topped the Billboard charts, the argument could be made that Parker's piracy made the song Lewis's first #1 single, but it wound up being Parker's last song to even reach the Top Ten.”
The is no source or citation for this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paige Matheson (talk • contribs) 22:23, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  I removed the following. 

message: I did a quick cleanup to correct some incorrect musical terminology where the description of single-version of the song holds on a chord and fades out. I noticed a "needs citation" note there, but I'm wondering what is needed. The single-version itself is the citation, because one can listen to it happen. Is the outstanding question whether or not this is the single-version? Is it merely in the wrong place and meant to ask about the multiple edits?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guyne (talk • contribs) 17:31, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed (is it?) on description of the ending of the single-version
Talk:3GG

message: As per either a recent request at section for assessment requests or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: article is a stub and required referencing  However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question. ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it.--VS talk 08:07, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment completed for [[{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:3gg.jpg, found on :3GG, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 23:25, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
Talk:Hit106.9 Newcastle

message: I question that this radio station ever had the official callsign 2XX given that the exact same callsign 2XX was assigned to a public radio station in Canberra.  I am aware that 2NX became known on-air as X13 but the off-air callsign I don't believe was officially changed to reflect this Andjb 14:25, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Callsign
Talk:2AY

message: As per either a recent request at section for assessment requests or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: as detailed on article page this article is at the stub stage - importance to the project is low.  However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question. ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it.--VS talk 04:55, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment completed for [[{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]