Talk:List of characters in Suikoden III

message: There may still be some errors from the merged content, so feel free to proofread this.
As a comment, please consider carefully before changing any of the header names.  There are redirects heading there from the "main" article (for example, Duke (Suikoden)), so you may need to change around several redirects and links as well in order not to break them.  You may want to warn and ask for comment on the talk page before doing so. SnowFire 03:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The good: Oh my god someone finally started working on the Suikoden mess. I love you.
The bad: Zero references. I have difficulty B-classing anything without any refs.
The good: It's well-organized and well-written, and knows well enough to put several minor characters in a single sentence when it can.
The bad: It has a very in-universe bent, and is a little image-heavy.
I'm impressed, but at the same time it's a kind of corner case, and seems rather borderline. Ultimately I don't feel comfortable giving it B-class. Nifboy 03:23, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: (Completely unnecessary double assessment) - I completely agree.  Pop some out-of-universe info in these characters, ref it up, and it's a B.  From, there, I dunno.  I don't think that there's a Featured List that's a list of characters, and I don't know how one should be set up.  --PresN 04:38, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, List of Metal Gear Solid characters is in fact a featured list of characters.  Something to aim for!  Yay!  SnowFire 05:35, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: CVG assessment

message: Could you please slow down?  I don't want to have to mass revert your changes, but there's already a list of characters at 108 Stars of Destiny (Suikoden).  Ideally, this article should eventually be "Suikoden III characters" and not merely be a list; I for one prefer prose for sensibly grouped characters.  SnowFire 20:04, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  To  142.58.79.7. 

message: :Image:Sergeantjoe.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Sergeantjoe.jpg