lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Royal Liverpool University Hospital

message: Why is there no mention under the History topic that the initial green light for the new hospital was first proposed in 2008, as stated in the BBC News documentary "Operation Relocation: Hospital on the Move" https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m001f2xc/operation-relocation-hospital-on-the-move 92.18.38.79 (talk) 04:00, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History/ Green light for new hospital building
Talk:Japanese destroyer Sazanami (1931)

message: There appears to be a current destroyer with the same name:
Japanese warship visits Chinese port
Well-wishers waving Chinese and Japanese flags as Japanese destroyer Sazanami arrives in Zhanjiang in southern China's Guangdong province on Tuesday.
--Pmsyyz (talk) 18:10, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Refer to JS Sazanami (DD-113). --benlisquareT•C•E 15:51, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current ship
Talk:Splitter

message: What about the slang meaning of "splitter", as an epithet hurled in the Monty Python movie Life of Brian, and referenced in the title of the Eric Idle/John Cleese/Rick Moranis movie Splitting Heirs?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.1.70.7 (talk) 02:57, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree, I guess.  :) CougarDave (talk) 02:09, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slang term 

message: There is currently no article describing a Splitter control that is very common used in graphical user interfaces to modify the size two adjacent view panes.  I propose this vital, and extremely common graphical widget have an article on it's own.  Agree or disagree?  --CougarDave (talk) 19:26, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree, I guess.  :) CougarDave (talk) 02:09, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  GUI Widget
Talk:Harry Blackstone Jr.

message: The paragraph "Named 'Magician of the Year'... ...including his father" matches the third paragraph of http://www.amdest.com/stars/harryb.html word for word.
Klodolph 10:10, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  I've reverted the article to an earlier version. --Elonka 23:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The entire article needs to be rewritten. If I have time, I will work on that.
Houdinimuseum (talk) 22:09, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite Needed
Talk:Swedish East India Company

message: The last section of the article says that some history enthusiasts built a replica ship and set out for China in 2005. Were they successful? I get the impression that this part of the article was written while the voyage was in progress. (Huey45 (talk) 08:21, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to the voyage in 2005? 

message: The correct translation of the book title "Min son på galejan" is really "My son on the galley", not "in", see the official translation by Peter Graves in the refs. If the title only referred to life on the boat, the correct title would be "My son in the galley". But the phrase "på galejan" also means "to be on a roll", "be on the go", "have fun", "get drunk and have a ball", etc, in Swedish. And this is what the book is all about. It's a book about all the things a 17 year old guy does on a boat with free booze on its way to China, while his parents are at home in Sweden... I leave the rest to your imagination. Or, read the book. Hence "on the galley". w.carter-Talk 14:52, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost in translation
Talk:Bridgman–Stockbarger method

message: Some questions:
Why is the Czochralski process more difficult for gallium arsenide?
Is in other cases the Czochralski process better? Why?
Is this process mostly done in a long container? That seems to me the easiest way to cool down starting from one side.
Any photographic material?
:It is more difficult as the Gallium and Arsenic evaporate at different rates.  This means that one needs to encapuslate the melt as you pull the crystal. The density of defects in the crystal boule also tend to be higher.Nashikawa (talk) 22:52, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Hello,
is the technique the same as the Bridgman-Stockbarger? Is it Bridgeman or Bridgman? (Googlefight says Bridgman-Stockbarger and not Bridgeman-Stockbarger).
cdang|write me 14:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it is the same as Bridgman-Stockbarger, and I think you may be correct here on the spelling too although articles do not exist in wikipedia with this name yet  I think....Nashikawa (talk) 22:52, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bridgeman or Bridgman 

message: I have added references to Bridgeman's and Stockbarger's original papers concerning each technique. I have edited the description about the differences between the techniques to make it clear how they differ. I have added a note at the beginning of the article about the spelling of Bridgman's name (it's not spelled Bridgeman, it's spelled Bridgman)
Patrick (talk) 17:39, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referenced added, minor edits
Talk:Immunoprecipitation

message: What about problems with co-immunoprecipitation, ie. the need for specific antibodies, the fact that you can only target already known proteins?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.38.153.239 (talk) 14:18, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Co-immunoprecipitation

message: Immunoblots usually show one column labelled "input".  What exactly is this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.105.5.61 (talk) 04:57, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: What is input?

message: This article looks like the weekly emails I get from Invitrogen telling me that I can't possibly get good results using agarose beads for an IP. They are trying to push everyone to (their) magnetic beads which are more expensive and often lead to higher background. It would be nice to see a more balanced article rather than a sales pitch.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.216.193.83 (talk) 18:41, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs balance

message: I believe that this article is either fundamentally wrong, or at the very least the introductory paragraph is wrong. Classically, the term immunoprecipitation refers to using both a primary and a secondary antibody or a primary antibody and protein A to turn soluble proteins into a insoluble large complex that can be isolated by centrifugation (example see here: http://www.millipore.com/immunodetection/id3/immunoprecipitation). It seems that these days purification of a protein with antibody-coupled beads or resin is often called immunoprecipitation, even though I don't think this is historically accurate. At the very least the sentence " Immunoprecipitation requires that the antibody be coupled to a solid substrate at some point in the procedure." is most certainly false. Immunoprecipitation can be performed without coupling antibodies to a solid substrate and this is how it was most commonly performed as little as 15 years ago.Hrun0815 (talk) 03:11, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Fundamentally wrong?
Talk:Gene Ontology

message: I would expect an article to start with definition, it starts with structure of the project. First what is it then how it works. --ArazZeynili 14:50, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I second that. That's what I was searching for initially. I suppose one could infer the meaning, but still... la gaie 23:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Maybe you're confusing AMIGO or something similar with what GO actually is?  GO is a set of ontologies, as described in the first two paragraphs.  Why talk about what GO is used for before saying what it is?  Just my 2-cents :-)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.12.146.118 (talk) 05:34, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition? 

message: Is the following useful in this article? 
Gene name     	GO accession	GO type           	GO term                 	GO evidence code	PO  accession	PO term
LOC_Os05g03480	GO:0005739  	Cellular component	mitochondrion           	IEA             	             	
LOC_Os05g03480	GO:0003824  	Molecular function	catalytic activity      	IEA             	             	
LOC_Os04g52210	            	                  	                        	                	PO:0007134   	Vegetative growth
LOC_Os04g52210	            	                  	                        	                	PO:0007133   	Leaf production
LOC_Os04g52210	            	                  	                        	                	PO:0009012   	Plant growth and development stages
LOC_Os04g52210	GO:0016102  	Biological process	Diterpenoid biosynthesis	                	             	
              	            	                  	                        	                	             	
:No. girlwithglasses (talk) 20:41, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Gene ontology
Talk:The Blue Humans (band)

message: This article very clearly doesn't meet SD criteria. The band it describes are important and well-known in avant-garde and experimental music circles, and have worked with a number of notable musicians (David S. Ware, Thurston Moore). Further, the article already asserts notability by making the point I've just made here. Cheers, Sam Clark 10:24, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They have their own page at Amazon here. I had never heard of them but they seem notable to me. Lots and lots of google hits. I removed the speedy tag. --Woohookitty(meow) 11:15, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion?
Talk:Secretion assay

message: I was going to wikify the reference but i can't find the paper it refers to. Does anyone know anything about it? Abergabe (talk) 10:48, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference

message: Did you mean "antigen-antibody complex"?Hwfr (talk) 14:00, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antibody-antibody complex
Talk:William le Gros, Earl of York

message: This needs checking. (RJP 10:29, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of death

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article.-- Jreferee 22:35, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: What is the clear reliable evidence that he was the 1st Earl of Albermarle. I cannot find any. David Lauder 13:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know. The numbering is conventional, and he was an English Earl (from 1138) as well as Count of Aumale. Charles Matthews 15:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the reply. If he was the 1st Earl there must be a mention of it somewhere. But if even Cockayne couldn't find it, it must be suspect. David Lauder 17:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Evidence
Talk:Satin Doll

message: "It is possible that the music was not co-composed by Ellington"....  How in the world can that be published?  It's also possible that Strayhorn did not co-compose it, and for that matter I suppose it's "possible" that it was composed by aliens living in the Bermuda Triangle.  Anything is "possible".  It's possible that somebody else wrote it and Strayhorn and Ellington stole the song at gunpoint.  It's possible that Duke was inspired while eating a chimichanga.  Maybe we should put that in?  Anything is possible.  This statement should either be changed, referenced, or deleted.    —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.154.72.42 (talk) 14:34, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Co-Composed

message: I removed Billie Holiday from the list of people who've recorded this song, because she never did, and replaced her with Nancy Wilson.
:Good job.  I just assumed she did, given the popularity of the song and her prolific career. AdamBiswanger1 14:04, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Billie Holiday

message: Richard Pryor has a bit about a women named "Satin Doll" and he claims that she was the actual women in the song. Jason Quinn (talk) 02:22, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Here a link to Pryor's bit (Richard Pryor:THE MAFIA). At the beginning his explicitly mentions Satin Doll and her relavence to Duke Ellington. Jason Quinn (talk) 13:58, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard Pryor bit
Talk:Duff Beer (The Simpsons)

message: I'm restoring the section with a Simpsons Archive reference stating "Duff can be compared to the Anheuser-Busch Companies". I hope that clears up your OR objection. As for two of my points not making sense, we can try hashing those out here. Ribonucleic 21:45, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Similarities to Budweiser" section

message: It is rumoured that Duff beer takes its name from Duff McKagan of Guns N Roses fame. Apparently Matt Groening reveals this on a DVD. Can anyone confirm or deny this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.50.143.20 (talk • contribs) 
: Which DVD? I haven't heard anything like that... -- Scorpion 15:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article also implies that the opposite might be true, but that would be incosistent with Duff beer being named as such in 1990, but Mckagan being credited with his nickname in the liner notes of 1987's Appetite For Destruction. Removing this line.--Tutsuro (talk) 23:51, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Duff McKagan]] 

message: I live in England and have never heard the word other than when quoting The Simpsons. Anyone else?NIN 17:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have corrected the meaning. Axl 18:34, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duff is British Slang? 

message: It is intentionally the "opposite" of Duff, with the consonant sounds being reversed, but with parallel spelling. Does anyone think this sentence is actually necessary?? i'm removing it ~ Bungalowbill 20:02, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fudd 

message: Okay that didn't go well for me :)
I'm sure there must be articles within the 600 and howevermany that don't belong but as I've already been accused of only doing this because I dislike the simpsons (and I don't dislike the simpsons, I literally just finished watching an episode) I think I'll concentrate my wikipedia time on other subjects. Restepc (talk) 18:44, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not deleted
Talk:Back with a Bong!

message: WTF is “thrashy” about this band or album? I feel like they are just being lumped in with their buds in AF and Cro Mags, but as a musical description it makes no sense… Keithramone33 (talk) 21:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crossover Thrash?
Category talk:Liverpool F.C. matches

message: I think it's best that articles in this category are grouped by competition, and sorted by year, and then round. So, for example:
 Category:Liverpool F.C. matches|FA Cup 2006 R8
The final being the eighth round, effectively. Using the round number will sort it properly, although as most articles will be cup finals it's not a major issue. ArtVandelay13 10:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Category Sorting
Category talk:Biography articles of living people

message: Wait... isn't this redundant to the somewhat shorter named category? 68.39.174.238 07:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In working with the unCat project for BLP, I normally tag articles as "Living people".  Is this cat a redundancy to that?, .. are we moving to this instead of "Living people"?  Would it perhaps be better to make this a redirect to the more populated Category:Living people? — Ched :  ?  19:38, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy? 

message: Renaming to :Category:Biography of a living person would result in a more natural name, in my opinion. Biosthmors (talk) pls notify me (i.e. ) while signing a reply, thx 21:41, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename? 

message: Some important discussions are ongoing here on these afds 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Please join the discussion and opine, since this will create a precedent for other such Indian articles on WP existing now, and created in future. Please dont miss out! Educationtemple (talk) 14:40, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very Important discussion that may lead a statutes for Indian FNAS, FIAS, FNAAS, FISCA, FINAS
Talk:Ruth Underwood

message: I don't think anyone will argue that Ruth Underwood isn't a virtuoso, but this article reads like a fan club bio or profile. "Ruth went on to augment over 10 Zappa/Mothers recordings with her talents, dispatching marimba passages that would plunge most percussionists into despair with effortless grace and precision" could just as easily be written "Ruth went on to perform in over ten Zappa/Mothers recordings." Joseph N Hall 11:02, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to fix it, leaving just a single "impressive". Please have a look. David Sneek 20:36, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I believe I'm right in saying, and the Mothers of Invention page  supports this belief, that the first Mothers album Underwood played on was Uncle Meat, released in 1969, the same year she's credited with playing drums in The Hamilton Face Band. Underwood herself is quoted here as saying: "...I hadn't touched a pair of mallets since March of '77", yet this page states that she was: "...in Frank Zappa's Mothers of Invention from 1967 to 1977." and the "Years active" field reads: "1969—1982".
Doesn't that suggest that the "Years active" field should read: "1969—1977"?
But then again: she also says that Zappa sampled her playing during four days in June 1993, so should it perhaps read something akin to: "1969—1977 and 1993" instead?Jon O'Brien (talk) 20:20, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps she was doing drum work, composition, backup, or some other non-xylophone musical function or other. "Mallets" pertains only to xylophones and vibes and the like. Drumming involves "drumsticks", and no professional musician would interchange these terms-of-art. JohndanR (talk) 16:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Years active field discrepancy
File talk:PR China-SAR & SEZ-English.png

message: Why is Taiwan being shown as part of the PRC?--Yuje 11:07, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taiwan 

message: What is the purpose of this map? The special administrative regions and the special economic zones are by no way similar, nor is there anything to compare. Please show the rationale, or else IMHO this map is pretty useless. — Instantnood 20:22, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: it shows theyre all on the coast and mostly southern? Taiwan needs to be colored out, which can be easily done.--Jiang 02:32, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Although I don't always agree with Jiang's opinion, I agree that Taiwan should be colored out in this particular case. The area in dispute with India is also colored out. - Alan 07:23, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Well yes.. but is that the purpose of this map? Or else why putting them on the same map? — Instantnood 22:01, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Areas not under actual control, like Arunachel Pradesh, should be colored out as well, too. --Yuje 17:11, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose

message: I can see the image on the image's page itself, but it's not showing up on any of the articles that links to it.  Is this happening for anybody else?  Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 15:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this image showing up for anybody? 

message: how about kashgar? it was just added as a SEZ  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.126.210.99 (talk) 07:52, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  kashgar
Talk:1985 Formula One World Championship

message: The article stated that Keke Rosberg's pole lap at Silverstone was at an average speed of 200kph. However, that was inaccurate, since the lap time was a 1:05.591, on a 4,718 km circuit. Doing the maths, this equates to a 258.95 kph average speed, which is, as near as makes no difference, approximately 160-161 mph. 86.105.254.20 (talk) 16:52, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone massively underestimated Keke Rosberg's record lap 

message: To the list of "lasts" in the last(!) paragraph, it might be added that this was the last season to date in Formula 1 for the Alfa Romeo team. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 90.201.110.117 (talk) 23:57, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another "Last" 

message: So, I was looking like the Equipe Ligier Gitanes Team, and I don't see any photos of that car, so I hope Wikipedia can add it. 103.108.21.74 (talk) 07:56, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some Of The Cars Pictures
Talk:1985 South African Grand Prix

message: Zakspeed's withdrawal was nothing to do with Apartheid, the team only entered the European rounds in 1985.
Tom Prankerd (talk) 07:49, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. Fixed. Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 08:15, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zakspeed
Talk:Someday My Prince Will Come

message: Both Miles Davis and Bill Evans spell it someday on their album sleeves Kisch 11:16, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Some Day or Someday?
Talk:Pincher Martin

message: I read with surprise that this is a  'twist ending which has caused the reputation to decline'. Certainly its full appreciation requires a belief in the non-material that not all may wish to share. But it's of the essence of the allegory - my Headmaster, bless 'im, liked it for that too. Linuxlad 11:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Twist Ending

message: I am shocked to see the novel described as 'a survivalist novel'. Minimalist, psychological, popular and well known, gruelling, critically acclaimed - take your pick. Just looking at it logically, survivalism is defined on WP as "a movement of individuals or groups (called survivalists or preppers) who are actively preparing for emergencies" etc. i.e. a form of social paranoia, not an individual struggling to survive an unexpected disaster. This appears to have been inserted to bolster Survivalism in fiction which looks suspiciously like original research. I have deleted the references although no doubt they will pop up again. ProfDEH (talk) 09:22, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survivalism 

message: Ndstead (talk) 14:49, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death or survival
Talk:Protein targeting

message: This section is woefully inadequate.  Some things that I can't flesh out right now, but that should be mentioned (at the very least), include:
* SRP recognition vs. secB recognition of signal sequence
* The SecYEG translocon
* Targeting to the periplasm and outer membrane in gram negative bacteria
Josh 10:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bacterial targeting 

message: I don't think that the NES and NLS entries should be merged to this site. Transportation in and out of the nucleus is a reversible process, which is tightly regulated. In this entry "protein targeting" is defined as a processes which transport a protein to its appropriate position, a process which is irriversible. I don't think that all active transport of proteins should regarded as proteins targeting. User:Hededam 16:41, 23 Nov 2006
Do not merge.  I agree with Hededam's reasoning.  Nuclear proteins are often regulated by changing their localization in response to a signal, which is a pretty big topic to include in a merged article and doesn't really apply to general protein targeting.
Josh 08:19, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NES and NLS should not be merged to this entry

message: A list would be interesting. 76.111.8.39 (talk) 19:16, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "errors can lead to diseases." 

message: Has anybody informations about cotranslational translocation in bacteria? I know that they do it also but cannot find informations about the machanism. 
I think it would be nice to mention this fact also in the article. I would change it by myself but my english is not good enough to feel comfortable by this thought... Baertierchen (talk) 14:54, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cotranslational translocation 

message: — Assignment last updated by Neeko Sneako2 (talk) 18:40, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Molecular Genetics