Talk:Trucking industry in the United States

message: Well thats pretty much all I can do for this article at the moment. I know I skipped over the "golden years" of trucking, the 70s, but that almost deserves an article into itself. I did a quick google search but I really couldn't find any reliable sources of info about it. I've been working on this article for pretty much two days straight so I'm sick of looking at it. But feedback would be appreciated, since this is my first really BIG article that I've created. Enjoy! ErgoSum88 (talk) 10:17, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok so I finally added a section about the 70s. ErgoSum88 (talk) 00:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: First, know that I'm not an admin or anything close to a pro at evaluating Wiki-articles. However, I do have some suggestions based on what I've learned during my time here.
* Much as I love the WW1 truck photo, it may detract somewhat from the flow of the history section being as wide as it is.
* The article is around 34K in size; splitting the list of trucking terms into a separate article would clean up the size greatly. It also is the kind of thing that goes into too much detail for an overview article like this one, and the information is better presented in an article by itself with more potential for expansion if needed. (I'm good at list articles; I can split it out and refine it if you'd like.)
* Be careful in some of your phrasing - certain words (like "mostly" or "nearly all") will cause concern unless sourced.
Excellent work otherwise, and well-sourced in the main. Let me know if you have any other questions... Duncan1800 (talk) 22:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see History of the trucking industry in the United States for coverage of the Teamsters. --ErgoSum•talk•trib 15:18, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: This article was nominated for good article reassessment to determine whether or not it met the good article criteria and so can be listed as a good article.  Please see the archived discussion for further information.
:I've closed the GAR as withdrawn per nominator's request. It's also currently a GAN so it's best to keep the GAR separate from the new nomination. PeterSymonds | talk 19:38, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:GAR|Good article reassessment]] 

message: The GA reviews on this page have been archived to subpages and can be accessed via the article history template at the top of the page. Dr. Cash (talk) 04:10, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA reviews

message: I deleted this section because I thought it was pure politics. “Rep. Larry Bucshon (R-IN) stated that he sponsored the bill” sounds like a plug for Rep. Larry. Who cares who sponsored it? It passed congress and was signed by the president. Just as Larry, Barack’s name could also be considered a political plug.
The line “in reaction to…apnea” is an opinion, the reference is just some blog.
This is all covered in the article on this bill. Isn’t that where it belongs?
Anyway, I deleted this section as pure politics. If you disagree, put it back, your call.  Sammy D III (talk) 19:21, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  deleting "Legislation" 

message: Trucks are commonly measured by wheels, 4x2, 4x4, 6x4, 6x6, etc. I think pretty much everyone uses this system. It is (number of wheels) x (number of powered wheels).  This system has two wheels per axle, single or dual tires do not matter. 
Combinations are often counted by axles. US laws use axle, with no mention of single or dual tires. (Duals are prohibited on steer axles).
Some US west coast over the road truckers said “eighteen-wheeler” for their 5 axle combinations, referring to the number of tires. Local slang, sort of. Movies have made this nickname common, but other than that, tires are not often counted. This can be confusing.  Sammy D III (talk) 20:49, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Axles, tires, wheels 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Trucking industry in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714193727/http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/freight_analysis/faf/faf2_reports/reports7/index.htm to http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/freight_analysis/faf/faf2_reports/reports7/index.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100330151128/http://www.logisticsmgmt.com/article/336066-Top_50_Trucking_Companies_Special_Report_Excellence_in_Motion.php to http://www.logisticsmgmt.com/article/336066-Top_50_Trucking_Companies_Special_Report_Excellence_in_Motion.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080403130525/http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/rules-regulations/administration/fmcsr/fmcsrruletext.asp?rule_toc=764§ion=395.15§ion_toc=1947 to http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/rules-regulations/administration/fmcsr/fmcsrruletext.asp?rule_toc=764§ion=395.15§ion_toc=1947
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.randmcnally.com/pdf/tdm/Federal_Bridge.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080218001436/http://www.gsa.gov/gsa/cm_attachments/GSA_DOCUMENT/ATADriverShortageStudy05_R25-c-d_0Z5RDZ-i34K-pR.pdf to http://www.gsa.gov/gsa/cm_attachments/GSA_DOCUMENT/ATADriverShortageStudy05_R25-c-d_0Z5RDZ-i34K-pR.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080218001436/http://www.gsa.gov/gsa/cm_attachments/GSA_DOCUMENT/ATADriverShortageStudy05_R25-c-d_0Z5RDZ-i34K-pR.pdf to http://www.gsa.gov/gsa/cm_attachments/GSA_DOCUMENT/ATADriverShortageStudy05_R25-c-d_0Z5RDZ-i34K-pR.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:24, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It is necessary to add the industry regulation and his history (It was regulated?  it is regulated now? I understand that some years ago companies need a specific license to operate between two places. This is the case now?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cuye (talk • contribs) 22:46, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Industry Regulations