lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Obert Logan

message: First, Obert Logan is dead.  In the article I cite his obituary in the San Antonio Express News.  Therefore this cannot be a biography of a living person.
Second, There is a good deal of controversy at Wikipedia about what is and is not reliable sourcing for an article.  In the articles I write I follow the same standards that I use for scholarly articles for publication, that is I follow the standards of the Chicago Manual of Style and current practice in academia generally. 
Under these standards, a personal communication is a valid source if the individual making the communication was an eyewitness to the events reported.  I followed the career of Obert Logan from the time I was 12 years old and the things I report in the article are things I saw happen with my own eyes.  The veracity of these reports are confirmed by citations to newspaper articles that describe events entirely in keeping with those I report.  
After I posted the first version of this article, a second poster, who had known Logan personally in the second part of his life, after Logan left the playing field for coaching, reported more facts, of which he had personal knowledge, and which again could be confirmed through newspaper articles reporting similar incidents. 
As nearly as I can tell the person who tagged this article, feels that if we had taken this information and gotten it published somewhere else, and then cited it on Wikipedia, that this would be acceptable.  But that the article is unacceptable because we composed it on Wikipedia.  
I have to say I think this is nonsense.  I believe this article to be a perfect example of the potential of Wikipedia. I, who knew and loved Obert Logan, a man with a significant football career, that is not reported in other sources, create an article about him and publish it here.  This attracts someone else who knew and loved Logan to contribute to the article.  Thus Wikipedia functions as a repository of information that would be unlikely to be brought together in any other way. 
This is completely different from me coming up with some crossed eyed theory about something and insisting on inserting it into Wikipedia articles on the subject.  The information in this article is well attested, and the fact that it is unavailable in any other source, is, to my mind, not a problem but an example of Wikipedia at its best.  If Wikipedia is not about bringing together accurate information from multiple sources, then someone should tell me what it IS for. Kcranson (talk) 11:13, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Searching for David's Heart

message: Very inappropriate. Someone should take this person off the site for using Msn language. This is a writing sight not some MSN show. It was a good intenton nbut please don't let it happen again. Don't you ever check what people write, Wikipedia? This is unacceptable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.196.86 (talk) 16:13, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: MSN Signs
Talk:No. 333 Squadron RNoAF

message: There was a brief discussion in January 2023 about whether this squadron should be listed/titled as RAF, RNoAF or both separately. The result was that the articles should be titled RNoAF with redirects from RAF, and that RAF info should be included in the history sections. BucketOfSquirrels (talk) 23:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: This article was discussed at WikiProject Military history
Talk:Dario Pegoretti

message: Mention of Floyd Landis brings the tone of this article down considerably.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nono1234 (talk • contribs) 19:33, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree.  He is a professional cyclist and won the Tour de France, until he got disqualified for substance abuse.  In any event, that he chose to own one of Pegoretti's bikes speaks highly of the bike and the esteem in which the builder is held. We are are not creating a press release here.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:13, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Maxi Biancucchi

message: I just edited this line  - "Maxi is sixteenth insofar as foreigners on number of appearances for Flamengo in the club's history," - to make some kind of sense (although it still feels clunky) since the prior version made none whatsoever. But is it really noteworthy enough to be in the article at all? Sixteenth most appearances (among foreigners) hardly seems relevant. Auqakuh (talk) 18:13, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sixteenth Most Appearances" 
Talk:Development of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion/Archive 1

message: The problem I see with this (ad the reason I nom'd it for AfD) is because it's too dense. Paragraph upon paragraph of text, with some kinda trivial bits thrown in (As hahnchen noted, how the booth for E3 was set up???). It's kinda reader-unfriendly. David Fuchs 14:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dense in what sense? Geuiwogbil 14:45, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just thick with detail, that the focus gets a little muddled. It's not really an issue with readability in terms of sentences, because they're grammatically correct and well-written, but just reading the article, I kind of feel... confined. Maybe some images would help, but I still think it's just a little too long under each heading. David Fuchs 15:06, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay. Give me a moment; I had to do the same thing with the parent "Development" article. Shorter paragraphs, more subheadings, more images. Geuiwogbil 15:11, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How does it look now? Better? Geuiwogbil 16:07, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA
Talk:The Barney Mysteries

message: I'm referring to this passage in the article:
Rätsel um den tiefen Keller ("Riddle of the Deep Cellar"). This is a translation of the one-off book, The Mystery That Never Was
The Mystery That Never Was is not a Barney mystery.  I haven't seen the German translation, but it looks as if it might be a translation of an adaption (in English) of the original novel into one of the "Riddles" series, in which 6 non-series Blyton books were reworked (but the plots otherwise left much the same) into a series with common characters - this book being adapted into The Riddle That Never Was.  But Barney and his friends are not amongst these characters.  The Mystery That Never Was and The Riddle That Never Was feature a cellar deep underground in their plot - so the German book appears very probably to be a translation of the latter, which fits in with the German title referring to "Keller".
So I believe the passage quoted above should be removed from the article, unless someone can show that the German version has been adapted to include Barney and his friends (something I've never heard of, and which would surprise me greatly).  But that removal will require reorganizing of other parts of the article.  I'm thinking about how this might be done, and may return to this later. M.J.E. (talk) 15:01, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erroneous inclusion amongst German titles.
Talk:Ismael Blanco

message: Come on people, who is trolling here? He will not play for Szczakowianka.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.68.186.214 (talk) 23:14, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Talk:The Extraordinary Adventures of Alfred Kropp

message: Seriously, this page is so vandalized. I notice very often people deleting things, changing the name of the author, etc. I found this year that someone had changed the title of the author to 'Yo Momma' and it had stayed that way for about a year. Only sysops can semi-protect a page, right? Let's get one on the case. ... -Panther (talk) 00:46, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: I'm thinking we might have to semiprotect this page
Talk:The Hardy Boys/Nancy Drew Mysteries

message: Y'know, I've been re-watching the show, and I can't find anywhere where the show either states the Hardys ages or claims they're two years apart; the episode "Jade Kwan Yin" makes a heavy implication that both are still in high school. Are you sure you're not confusing this with the 1995 show, with Paul Popowich and Colin Grey, which DID set the brothers as two years apart?  In the books at the time of the 70s show, the Hardys are only 1 year apart. Zenfrodo (talk) 02:28, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ages of the Hardy Boys 

message: This article states that "the characters were known to each other in the framework of the books". Actually, no, the Hardy Boys and Nancy Drew were NOT known to each other in the books at that time; only the blue and yellow hardcovers existed at that point (and only up through Witchmaster's Key for the Hardy Boys).  The Hardys and Drew know each other in the current paperback series, but those were NOT in existence at the time of the '70s show. I'm editing this article to correct that. Zenfrodo (talk) 23:29, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do the Hardy Boys and Nancy Drew Know Each Other? 

message: Edited Bayport's location. In the show, Bayport is set in Massachusetts; Chief Collig states it explicitly in the episode "Mystery of the Jade Kwan Yin", the episode "Mystery of Witches Hollow" shows the Hardys as having MA license plates on their van, and Fenton says "Bayport, Massachusetts" AGAIN in "House on Possessed Hill".  The TV SHOW sets it in Massachusetts.  The BOOKS place it in NY.  Please stop correcting this article, since it's on the '70s show -- for the show, MA is Bayport's correct location.  Zenfrodo (talk) 01:01, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bayport's Location 

message: Should be included in celebrities list 2600:100C:B02F:9307:B846:1452:1748:C653 (talk) 18:03, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard Kiel in Season 1 Episode 1 (The Haunted House)
Talk:Mario Bolatti

message: Does he holds Italian nationality and not occupy the quota? Matthew_hk tc 16:23, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Second nationality
Talk:Mauro Boselli

message: has been making changes without including verifiable references from reliable sources, and without discussing on its user talk page.   — Jeff G. ツ 23:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced changes 

message: Boselli and his agent travelled to England to tie up a deal with EPL side Wigan Athletic. Despite late intrest from Turkish League Runner ups Busapor FC the deal is set to be completed for a fee thought to be in the region of £7million, a club recored transfer fee for Wigan Athletic.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.192.141.231 (talk) 13:09, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  /* June 2010 */ 

message: | years4      =2008–2010
| years5      = 2010–
| clubs5      = Wigan Athletic
| caps5       = 0
| goals5      = 0
On the 29th June 2010 Wigan Athletic announced the signing of Mauro Boselli on a four year contract for an undisclosed fee. Roberto Martinez, Wigan's current manager has said "Mauro is a goalscorer, who lives to put the ball in the back of the net and he is somebody we have been looking at for a long time."
Wigan Athletic fan's are said to be very pleased with the signing, and are excited to be able to watch Mauro in action.
            
WegueWegue (talk) 10:04, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from WegueWegue, 29 June 2010 
Talk:Gideon Rachman

message: According to his blog he was the business editor, not Charlemange.
http://blogs.ft.com/rachmanblog/2007/08/wikipedia-and-c.html
Wikimam 12:21, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Read the introductory entry on his blog: he was also Charlemagne. RCSB 12:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Here is where he claims this (read interest number 2 - Europe). RCSB 12:36, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right! I thought I'd actually add your reference to his opening statement on his blog as a footnote and see where this goes :) Take a peek here [] tho, maybe he forgot or - what's more likely - he's actually testing when and how fast the rabbit will pop out of the hat...  Wikimam 14:10, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you misunderstood Gideon: He wrote his blog post before I corrected the entry. The original entry claimed that his last job at The Economist was Charlemagne. He meant to say that although he was indeed Charlemagne - this wasn't his last position at The Economist. But I am guessing you read his blog post after I had already corrected it (adding that he was also business editor - his last job). Therefore, you mistakenly surmised that he was referring to the corrected version as being incorrect. RCSB 14:47, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:4-Chloroindole-3-acetic acid

message: Desperately needs up-to-date information. For example, the intriguing "death hormone" theory from the previous century has not been discussed in recent publications..  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osmoregulator (talk • contribs) 12:40, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The death hormone aspect is discussed in the cited 1996 paper - that's not all that old.  The content certainly seems relevant enough to continue to be included in the article.  What new "up-to-date" information do you think could be added the article?  ChemNerd (talk) 19:14, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date 

message: The space filling model looks like someone interchanged the 1-position nitrogen and the 3-position carbon on the indole ring.
149.155.222.31 (talk) 23:57, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Space Filling Structure is Wrong
Talk:St Anne's Church, Haughton

message: Article title incorrect - St Annes isn't in Haughton green, but in Haughton. Both are/were separate villages, and whilst Haughton Green still maintains a separate identity, Haughton's boundaries merged with the town Denton, and it lost it's separate identity in the 1880's.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.151.213.219 (talk) 22:02, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think you're right.  The rector (or at least someone claiming to be the rector) raised this a while ago, but the name didn't get changed.  The article is mostly the work of , I'm sure he'll be along soon.  Mr Stephen (talk) 22:16, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As there is consensus here, I've moved the article to St Anne's Church, Haughton. Nev1 (talk) 02:39, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Haughton or Haughton Green
Talk:Daantjie Badenhorst

message: Maybe they should add more about his condition, I for one would like to know what's wrong with him.
:Asperger Syndrome is wikilinked in the first sentence. Roger (talk) 08:35, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of BBC sitcoms

message: * I have removed the  tag from , which you proposed for deletion, because I think that this article should not be deleted from Wikipedia.  I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it.  If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the  template back to the article.  Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion.  Thanks! Warden (talk) 16:58, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed Mr. Bean from this list as the sitcom series was broadcast on ITV (Mr Bean has occasionally appeared on Comic Relief , but that does not justify inclusion here). Dunarc (talk) 23:36, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I have also removed Peep Show as that was a Channel 4 series not BBC. Dunarc (talk) 11:01, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Mr. Bean]]
Talk:Lyndhurst, New Jersey

message: I felt it necessary to remove the recent additions to the Lyndhurst baseball section due to its self promotion and original research. The section should only give an overview of the topic and any notable occurrences. Speculating on how upcoming seasons will be and going into details about the players such as one "is to busy going on the band trip" and another "can kill you with the bat" is not appropriate. I left the rest of the section alone for now but I feel listing every little league team may be going into to much detail. Rhvanwinkle (talk) 19:08, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyndhurst Baseball 
Template talk:Montenegrin elections

message: Is there a way to put a name of the parliament for the corresponding elections - because they greatly differ.
In 1905 it was the Constitutional Assembly of the Princedom of Montenegro, in 1907 it was the Serbian National Assembly of the Princedom of Montenegro, in 1911 and 1913 Serbian National Assembly of the Kingdom of Montenegro, in 1918 the Great Assembly of the Serb People in Montenegro, and in 1990, 1992, 1996, 1998, 2001 and 2002 the Assembly of the Republic of Montenegro and in 2006 the Constitutional Assembly of Montenegro. --PaxEquilibrium 12:49, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure it matters in the template - they are all some form of parliamentary election - I think it is for the articles themselves to say that. Otherwise the template would look quite messy. Number 57 13:15, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But it is so in the Yugoslavian elections template... --PaxEquilibrium 13:50, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand. Are you saying that some of them are Upper House (e.g. Senate) elections and some are Lower House (e.g. Commons)? If so, which are which, and we can divide them. Number 57 13:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the first one - Constitutional. --PaxEquilibrium 14:17, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Erm, we have tended to group Constituational Assemblies in with parliamentary elections in other templates; the problem being that there are so few (2 being the highest I've seen!) that it is hardly worth another line. In Template:Russian elections it was marked with a (CA), so we could do that if you want - I am in favour of leaving it as it is, but I will bow to your superior knowledge of all things Balkan :) Number 57 14:23, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

message: I think we should remove the 1946, 1950, 1953, 1958 1963, 1969, 1974, 1978, 1982, 1986 and 1989 alleged and unconfirmed parliamentary election years from this template. We have no real evidence, or any valid source that they were actually held in the years currenly indicated in this template. MneEdit 13:36, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The years are confirmed here, Number 57 13:40, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: 1945-1990 elections removal suggestion
Talk:Weetzie Bat

message: I performed a copy-edit of this page.  While doing so, I noticed two problems in the "Reception" section:
#The quote attributed to Mercier is actually part of a review of the book Girl Goddess #9 and does not directly refer to Weetzie Bat.  Therefore, its inclusion in this article is questionable, especially since the article text specifically ties Mercier's statement to Weetzie Bat.
#The citation given for the B.G. Censorship Watch does not, in fact, contain the stated quotation—at least not in the version available at the ALA's website.  Was this article different in the paper version?
// Macwhiz (talk) 19:02, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy edit
Talk:Zahrah the Windseeker

message: Does anyone have a better reference for this book winning the Wole Soyinka Prize than a Guardian editorial?  Okorafor mentions it on her blog as well, but unfortunately the prize-awarding organization only has the past few years' winners listed.
SarahTheEntwife (talk) 00:25, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha!  I post a question and then I find the link.  That is not a well-designed web page. SarahTheEntwife (talk) 00:28, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Soyinka prize reference?
Talk:Phenglutarimide

message: ... cf http://books.google.com/books?id=_J2ti4EkYpkC&pg=PA2935-IA282&dq=Phenglutarimide&hl=en&sa=X&ei=rovIU6mWAYOsyAT0xIG4Bg&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Phenglutarimide&f=false
and http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/summary/summary.cgi?cid=102669  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.246.174.181 (talk) 03:04, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure (image) looks incorrect
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spain/Assessment

message: Which bot updates this? There are many project tags without Quality and Importance assessments, it was User:SatyrBot that introduced the tags. I'm wondering:
# How to asseses the articles, I had a go at hand to do 20 or so but its hell. Any bot, script? Something like: IWLC  
# Is it the same bot, or is it another one, that creates those assessment log changes?
# Why some articles still how as uncategorised even after they are categorised in the importance scale? example Talk:Alcalá de Henares
--Figarema |Talk  22:09, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment log 

message: "The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the . . . project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Spain articles by quality and Category:Spain articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist." What the devil does THAT mean? Querulously, GeorgeLouis (talk) 19:39, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gobbledygook
Talk:OpenPGP card

message: YubiKey NEO token supports OpenPGP, though it is disabled by default:
http://www.yubico.com/2012/12/yubikey-neo-openpgp/
At present YubiKey does not support key import, only generation without possibility to export, which limits its usability.
Probably YubiKey NEO should be listed as another vendor of OpenPGP cards?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.79.141.66 (talk) 09:55, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Seamless branching

message: Perhaps an even more prominent example of localisation featuring seamless branching are the Star Wars DVDs (at least the international) offering their intro text in selected language.
:Seamless branching would not be used for the opening crawl of Star Wars. No matter what language you are using, everyone sees a scene there with the same audio. So, they use multiple angles. Normally, multiple angle lets you switch the camera angle during a scene. In this case, each angle is a different language. So, in the end, everyone sees their own language as a camera angle and everyone hears the same audio track. Of note, multiple angles is rarely seen in movies. It is extremely common in pornography, allowing the viewer to jump between different camera angles at will during each scene. 209.149.115.219 (talk) 14:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Cirsium eriophorum

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Cirsium eriophorum (Kozara National Park, Republika Srpska).jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for April 21, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-04-21. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:46, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Cirsium eriophorum (Kozara National Park, Republika Srpska).jpg scheduled for POTD
Talk:The 99

message: The article Jabbar (The 99) is an orphaned, small stub article. As far as I can tell, he's the only character who currently has his own article. Merging it into this one seems appropriate. Argento Surfer (talk) 19:43, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Dlabtot (talk) 22:16, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: The animated series has a Raqib the Watcher, which has been held by two different characters. Is this true in the comics as well? And should it be added to the list of characters? -- MidnightSoldier (talk) 23:45, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raqib the Watcher? 
Talk:Hertford County Hospital

message: Most of the information is taken from the 150th Annivesary booklet. I am conscious that I have no information from 1983 to 2003 !
GrahamHardy 13:30, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Most