lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Angelo Sodano

message: Not sure what this text means:
1987 demanded 7 catholic priests Sodano's recall from office.[1]. Also his part by the jointly appearance of the Papst and Pinochet in the balkony of La Moneda, used by the dictator as publicity, displayed him more as supporter than as detractor of the regime.
Did seven priests petition the Holy See for Sodano's recall, or did Sodono recall seven priests himself?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.87.166.248 (talk) 02:13, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please don't cover up reliable resources which reported abuse the same day as his resignation.2601:447:4100:C120:4DEA:87F4:A63F:1FF9 (talk) 21:03, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Sodano was fingered by Legion of Christ for protecting sexually abusive clergy in the organization and resigned the same day
Talk:Cardinal Secretary of State

message: sdfgsdfgsdfgsdf  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.199.179.238 (talk) 10:39, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Secretariat of State (Holy See)

message: There is a sub-section of the Secretariat of State that has been described by observers as a State within a State because of the influence of a secretive liberal lobby within the curial department. While the Church's diplomats are generally known to be more concerned about diplomatic and political activities than actual spirituality, there should be additional information about such claims on activist liberals who work within the Holy See itself. ADM (talk) 04:24, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Liberal Churchmen
Talk:Leviathan (disambiguation)

message: I removed all fictional entities. There are an endless list of these things, 99% trivial. It seems better to just have none. Yours hopefully, William M. Connolley 18:33, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Too much was removed, in your haste you have even removed the disambig template and the interwiki. In general I am Ok with trimming down the fictional sections, but some like Moby-Dick and Farscape should remain. IMHO a good criterion would be to keep those works in which the Leviathan creature plays a central role in the plot. Eldar 22:42, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well I've had another go. I think that its rather hard to decide which to keep: better to get trid of them all William M. Connolley 15:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've decided that hardness is not a reason not to try, so I tried bringing back some according to the criterion above. I'm confident that if in the future too many not so important entities are brought back, you'll be there to kick them out again. Eldar 23:34, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional entities 

message: I rm the following entries. Put them back in the dab page when they get a meaningful link:
* A manga series by Eiji Otsuka and Yu Kinutani
* A 1960's British psychedelic group that evolved from the Mike Stuart Span
* The codename of a projected tri-hulled (trimaran) warship
--maf 22:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-existing articles 

message: The link to the Paul Auster title of this name goes to a different authors book of the same title. I don't know how to make a new page, however it would be cool to have that page started and the link corrected! Crocadillion 04:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Paul Auster

message: This DAB page is here people looking for Leviathan find what they are looking for. If they knew that it was called Livyatan melvillei, they wouldn't be here. I'm fine with the overly long explanation because of the special circumstances, but they are here because they are looking for Leviathan melvillei, not Livyatan melvillei, so that is what the blue link should be to.
If you insist that Livyatan melvillei is really, really, the right thing to link to, then it should be in see also, since it is a related term, not Leviathan itself. 018 (talk) 02:26, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leviathan melvillei
Template talk:Hierarchy of the Catholic Church in Germany

message: Use this template for (arch)bishops as people, use Template:Dioceses in Germany for the corresponding territories. Articles which discuss both may include both. Rigadoun 18:34, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: , Most of the links are to the diocese articles, or redirects to the diocese articles. Those that link to the bishop are inconsistently articles about the bishop, or lists of bishops. It looks weird now that the wiki has developed a style for navboxes, and it's little used. All in all I think it's time to replace it's usage with Template:Dioceses in Germany. Your thoughts? Cabayi (talk) 14:25, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, obviously the style is old. It should match , which contrasts with  in the same way. But only a few countries are set up that way. There doesn't seem to be a lot consistency in how this is done by country, which is unfortunate. I think there is an argument for combining the diocese and bishop templates, where each diocese is followed by the bishop article or list (like "Diocese of X (bishop) * Diocese of Y (list of bishops)," but only when they are not redirects), but that doesn't seem to be how most of these are designed; they instead have the current bishops linked (for example, see ). But I don't know that there is any consensus here, though it would be nice to be more consistent (though it will take some work and might upset some people). If you're interested in doing so, I'd suggest asking at WP:CATHOLICISM. I'm certainly happy with anything that follows what that group have found to be consensus positions. Rigadoun  (talk) 04:46, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Major League Baseball Season 2006

message: User:MisfitToys asked if I'd comment on the above thread.  I've taken a look at some of the :Category:Years in baseball articles and the pre-redirect version of this article.  I think there are two basic issues:
#  Is an article containing a current list of MLB baseball standings and records appropriate as a Wikipepdia article? 
#:
#:IMO, the answer is no.  Per Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, point #5, Wikipedia should not offer first-hand news reports on breaking stories.  Reporting the standings changes resulting from last night's games seems to be included in this prohibition.  I'd include FIFA World Cup results and real time updates showing the latest Academy Awards (while the broadcast is still on) in the class of things that should not be added to Wikipedia.  The problem basically relates to Wikipedia:Citing sources.  If the current standings (or records or whatever) are included in Wikipedia, someone watching a live event might be encouraged to update this article based on the "truth" that he/she just witnessed on live TV (or in person).  This is not what Wikipedia is about.  It's about presenting pre-digested information, usually from secondary sources.
#:
# Are the current year in baseball articles too long?
#:
#:Well, yeah, but does this have anything to do with the previous question?  In particular, these articles present a whole slew of "facts" with no citation.  Again, although "true", without a reference to some source that I (or anyone else) can independently consult to verify these facts there's no way these facts should be included in Wikipedia.  These "articles" read much more like current events blog than Wikipedia articles.  Would it be way more work to only include cited material in a "this year in baseball" article?  You betcha.
-- Rick Block (talk) 03:44, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The articles lists the following sources: Baseball Hall of Fame, Baseball Almanac, Baseball Library, Baseball Reference, National Pastime and The Deadball Era.  Never been to spain 12:26, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

text: In addition to those sidebar sources (one of which I've just revised to become more year-specific), I'll note that the main articles for years (e.g. 1923) don't usually include any sources/citations. The 2006 article is already 46K, and yet includes only six in-line links (three of which are for the FA Cup final, and two are in regard to the projected date of the U.S. population reaching 300 million), and no footnotes or references. MisfitToys 21:15, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invited comment
Talk:Guy Hoffman

message: Would the Violent Femmes or any of it's members, fit the criteria to be added to the Alternative music work group? Wondering.. --leahtwosaints (talk) 08:14, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Femmes definitely would. Not sure about the members or their other projects. -Freekee (talk) 04:18, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative work group?
Talk:David Shaw (British politician)

message: Lawrence is a middle name - can it be removed from the title? --Dovea 18:42, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Simon Necronomicon

message: The article about Peter Levenda gives nice references why Peter Levenda is Simon. Do we have to copy them here, or how do you make a reference to Wikipedia inside Wikipedia?
213.243.182.196 (talk) 20:04, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: We would need to use the actual citations (the newspaper article) here. However, I'll point out that the obituary/personal story newspaper article doesn't actually credit Levenda--he calls it a "team effort". But, yes, getting that in here would be good. Qwyrxian (talk) 15:32, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Levenda is Simon? 

message: This article really need some details on the publication history, alleged 'real' history of publcation, and information on likely author(s) The Yeti (talk) 19:23, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Publication history
Talk:San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge weld controversy

message: This was deleted after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge weld controversy.  It was recreated afterwards.  I have no particular knowledge of this incident and no particular opinion, but in the interest of deferring to those who participated in the Afd, I've turned this into a redirect to Eastern span replacement of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.  Friday (talk) 18:45, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  deletion, recreation, and redirect 

message: Seems strange that Wikipedians would prefer to delete encyclopedic content. I recieved no notice of the proposal for deletion, even though I am the author (rather rude, I think). - Leonard G. 18:50, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Judging from the Afd, folks didn't think it was particularly encyclopedic.  Do you think this would be better covered in the other article?   At a glance, I'd say the other article is in much better shape than this one.  This is almost entirely source material, as was mentioned in the Afd.  Friday (talk) 18:52, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: These are summaries of the source material, some of which are in DOC format, and could be difficult for some to access. At least the links to the documents and the news articles should be included. The whole point of a separate article was to allow the user to drill down to summaries and then original source, without overburdening the refering article, which itself I took out of the SFOBB article in the interest of compactness and text flow. - Leonard G. 18:57, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, like I said, I don't have much opinion yet on this.  I did notify the Afd closer that his decision was in dispute, though.  Normally a case like this should go to WP:DRV instead of just being recreated, but I don't see any harm in discussing it here on the talk page instead.  Friday (talk) 19:10, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I did not notice the AFD

message: Could an administrator please change #REDIRECT Eastern span replacement of the San Francisco – Oakland Bay Bridge to #REDIRECT Eastern span replacement of the San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge as it is a double redirect. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 05:03, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --Redrose64 (talk) 15:13, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request
Talk:Tommy Thayer

message: tommy thayer played as ace frehley in cold gin before he was in the real kiss- that kind of makes the current situation more understandable to me. to the best of my knowledge however, eric singer never played as peter criss in a paul stanley-ace frehley-gene simmons-peter criss era kiss tribute band. Gringo300 22:54, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I think it should be noted that he worked on the hot in the shade album as well. He also wrote songs for carnival of souls too.173.24.69.153 (talk) 03:40, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: He didn't play on these albums, did he? If not they shouldn't be listed in his discography but could be noted in the body of the article. J04n(talk page) 09:48, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Hot in the Shade]] & [[Carnival of Souls: The Final Sessions]] 

message: I've reverted edits that violate the Wikipedia:Manual of Style, including:
* capitalization of headings per WP:HEAD;
* formatting of dates and numbers per WP:MOSNUM; 
* encyclopedia articles aren't on a first-name basis with their subjects - see WP:SURNAME;
* the names of TV shows are italicized;
* Wikipedia does not spell "Fox" all in capitals in the Fox Broadcasting Company;
* nor does it write "Kiss" all in caps.
Ground Zero | t 10:48, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverted edits

message: there are significant blp mistakes, long unsourced content, and LinkedIn copy in this article.
please properly source and cite these claims before readding,
thank you. 24.17.106.158 (talk) 20:20, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  biographical claims
Talk:Lawrence of Brindisi

message: If he's a Doctor of the Church, than presumably he left behind theological writings of significant importance, but the article only concentrates on his active ministry.  What were his major works? Why were they influential? --145.226.30.44 (talk) 07:57, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writings? 

message: I've compiled a list of resources if anyone wants to take a stab at expanding the article
* Wikisource: Catholic Encyclopedia (1913) https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Catholic_Encyclopedia_(1913)/St._Lorenzo_da_Brindisi
* Archivio Della Provincia Veneta dei Frati Cappuccini https://www.regione.veneto.it/web/cultura/archivio-della-provincia-veneta-dei-frati-cappuccini
* Roman Catholic Saints https://www.roman-catholic-saints.com/saint-lawrence-of-brindisi.html
* Faith.edu http://faith.nd.edu/s/1210/faith/interior.aspx?pgid=21051&cid=41225&ecid=41225&crid=0&calpgid=10745&calcid=53511
* Catholic Culture https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?id=9578
* Franciscan Media https://www.franciscanmedia.org/saint-lawrence-of-brindisi/
* Capuchin Friars https://web.archive.org/web/20130411043601/http://capuchinfriars.org.au/resources/capdox-capuchin-history/capuchin-saints-and-blesseds/july/saint-lorenzo-da-brindisi/
* Catholic Exchange https://catholicexchange.com/st-lawrence-of-brindisi
* Catholic Saints https://catholicsaints.info/saint-lawrence-of-brindisi/
* Crossroads Initiative https://web.archive.org/web/20150905184328/http:/www.crossroadsinitiative.com/library_article/128/Doctors_of_the_Church.html
Good luck! Firestarforever (talk) 18:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resources
Talk:Pitlochry

message: This article is one where each new idea is given a new paragraph. I am sure someone with more knowledge of the place than I (who have only visited it once last week!) can make this a much more "in-depth" article. It had a railway station over a hundred years ago, so that it isn't really a "twentieth-century foundation" as the article suggests. OK, so it is (like so much of Scotland!) a tourist place, but also an important transport link to the north, surely? Peter Shearan 18:50, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: And the evidence for this is what?
What is the difference between "popular" and "hugely popular"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.132.16.81 (talk) 18:32, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  and hugely popular with visitors 

message: I have removed the link to pitlochry.org from the infobox as the site is mostly promotional as opposed to informational. --Liam McM (Talk|Contribs) 18:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox website
Talk:Tiʻitiʻi

message: I don't understand this article.  Is Ti'iti'i or Mafui’e the equivalent of Māui, or are all three separate?  In any event it really needs rewording.   KarlM 18:52, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point - the confusion was carried over from Tregear, but became more evident once this article was separated as a stand-alone. Have reworded somewhat. Kahuroa 19:17, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Their legends are extremely similar, so it's assumed that Ti'iti'i and Māui are equivalent (however, Mafui’e is a different character in the legends). In addition, in Hawai'ian myths, he is referred to as "Maui-ki'i-ki'i", which combines both names. I've reworded it to try to make it clearer.Wasechun tashunka (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 21:26, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

message: Any thoughts on merging with all the other cultural articles on Maui? I think together they can all make a really good article on Maui, giving he is one of the few characters found throughout all Polynesia. This info would then become a section of the larger one, but I feel it would defiantly create an excellent and informative article on a pan-Polynesian character. Big-bad-juju (talk) 15:44, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Operation: Doomsday

message: The 2011 reissue has been released and information, including the tracklist and included materials, is on the stonesthrow records website (http://stonesthrow.com/news/2011/03/mf-doom-operation-doomsday-lunchbox), I would update the page myself, but i don't know enough about editing pages to be confident in the form used. also the website says it is being released on Dumile's Metalface records and not stonesthrow as the article states.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.73.74.131 (talk) 08:11, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2011 Reissue 

message: anyone know why someone keeps trying to remove the samples used on this album and vandalize this page? Med- (talk) 16:09, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sample Issue 

message: Can anyone explain how Subroc can be credited as a producer for this album, which was released four years after his death, and should this explanation be included in the beginning paragraphs of the article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.230.156.231 (talk) 02:40, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subroc's Death 

message: There are significant differences in production, writing, and feature credits between the original 1999 Fondle 'Em Records vinyl release, the 2001 Sub Verse Music re-release, and the 2008–present Metal Face Records re-release. I would think that the best thing to do would be to use the writing and production credits from the original 1999 Fondle 'Em Records vinyl release, but if there is a specific way that Wikipedia says album credits should be handled I would greatly appreciate it if someone could let me know. --Hostagecat (talk) 22:26, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've decided to be bold and update the personnel section to include the discrepancies between version releases. If there is a better way to do this or if anyone would like to discuss the inclusion of these differences (and whether they ought to be included in the first place), please respond to this post. --Hostagecat (talk) 20:33, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Credit discrepancies between releases
Talk:Rock the House Live!

message: Why was the song "Barracuda" linked to an irrelevant article on the fish "barracuda"? Please be more careful/thoughtful about creating hyperlinks. Please, only make links that are relevant to the context. Thanks! 66.17.105.226 18:52, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Calm down, dude. He just forgot to disambiguate it. --Machchunk | make some noise at me 23:59, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Chol HaMoed

message: Two holidays are not a very long list.  Why it is presented in with bullets instead of regualar prose?  Jon513 18:54, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

message: The name of the intermediary days of Pesach and Sukkot is actually "Cholo Shel Moed" and not "Chol Hamoed". 
There is a complete Talmudic Tractate dedicated to this, which is called "Moed Katan".  In the Mishnayot of this tractate, the general term of "Moed" is used, which could refer to the Yom Tov itself, or the intermediate days.  By context, it refers here to the intermediate days, because it speaks of shaving, washing clothes and writing, all which are prohibited on the Yom Tov itself. (Ref: Tractate Moed Katan, Chapter 3, Mishnah 1, 2 & 3).  In the Talmud (Gemara) on page 18A, et al., it is called "Cholo Shel Moed", literally, "the profane [section] of the Holiday". 
Maimonides in "Mishnah Torah", laws of the Holidays, Chapter 6, Law 22, says: The days between the first and seventh days of Pesach, and the first and eighth day of Sukkot ... are called 'Cholo Shel Moed'"; however, the Author of the Shulchan Aruch, Rabbi Yoseph Caro, uses the term "Chol HaMoed" (Chapter 530, Law 1, et al.).  Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi, author of in "Shulchan Aruch HaRav", is extremely particular to conform to the laws of "Dikduk" (Hebrew Grammar) in his Shulchan Aruch.  He uses the term "Cholo Shel Moed" when referring to the general concept of intermediate days (see Shulchan Aruch HaRav, 490:10). but when the term is attached ("Samooch") to a particular day , he will call it "Chol HaMoed Shel Pesach" or "Hold HaMoed Shel Sukkot" (ibid 490:15).  Thus, according to Hebrew grammar, "Chol Hamoed" should be "attached" to a noun, and not used as a stand-alone term; however, the colloquial usage of the term is "Chol HaMoed". even though it is not grammatically correct. Wildrucker (talk) 01:38, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct Name of Chol HaMoed
Talk:Tech Squares

message: I have removed the timeline as it is unsourced and trivial. WP tan 1999 (talk) 20:08, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Timeline: 

message: It could attract editors to improve this article, if it was listed in appropriate WikiProjects. Please add some. Lentower (talk) 23:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs to be listed in appropriate WikiProjects