lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dorsey Wright

message: I wsa reading Mr. Wrights credits and notice that he did not mention "The Theater for the Forgotten" were he got his start. Mr. Wright worked with Producer/Director Beverly Rich who produce a play Forever My Earth and Dream 76.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.44.117.252 (talk) 10:58, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dosh (musician)

message: Well done !  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pamour (talk • contribs) 21:11, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  mononymously 

message: There is a move request at Talk:DOSH which may impact this page. The proposal currently favoured is for this page, Dosh, to be moved to Dosh (musician), and for DOSH to then move to Dosh. Please give your opinions there, as appropriate. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 21:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move request 

message: It now forwards to a slotmachine/casino spam website. The best might be to link to his bandcamp: https://dosh.bandcamp.com/ Ave7578 (talk) 04:43, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  website: doshfamily.com is no longer his website
Talk:Doug Armstrong

message: Youtubefan90, I disagree with your move of this page. Please look at special:WhatLinksHere/Doug Armstrong and tell me how many of those articles do not relate to this Doug Armstrong of hockey fame. Do you not think this justifies putting this Doug here and demoting other Dougs to disambiguated titles? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:18, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move?
Talk:Doug Blair

message: Text and references copied from Doug Blair to Melissa VanFleet,  See former article's history for a list of contributors.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution
Talk:Doug Casey

message: Please add Doug’s most recent book, “Assassin”, which came out October 2020, to section 2.3 Books of this article.
Paperback ISBN 978-1947449091.
Also please hyperlink the URL for HighGround Books (http://highgroundseries.com) to the list items for this book and the previous two books.
Thank you!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8807:2308:1500:C17:31E7:4D11:C9CA (talk) 20:47, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add new book, “Assassin” to section 2.3 Books
Talk:Doug Chandler

message: I don't know how I could check the stats but didn't Doug Chandler win one of his AMA Championships without wining a single race? I thought I remembered that he was on the podium all the time but never on top.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.120.127.76 (talk) 00:31, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could someone verify...? 
Talk:Doug Dieken

message: I'm trying to find a RS regarding their marriage. I found a blog entry that possibly could be a RS because of its (unofficial) connection to WKYC-TV, but it only mentions the marriage and doesn't specify a time. The only source I found for their divorce is a non-RS blog entry. Anyone got anything better? Mapsax (talk) 22:36, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connie Dieken
Talk:Doug France

message: Added Career section.GarbledLecture933 (talk) 06:10, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: thought header would be better as football career.99appleseed (talk) 06:20, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Career
Talk:Sacco & Vanzetti (1971 film)

message: I've expanded this article, and deleted its stub status. Most of the new information for the expansion came from the German Wikipedia page Sacco und Vanzetti (film). I've followed the naming conventions agreed earlier on this page, so that
* Sacco e Vanzetti is used for the film
* Sacco and Vanzetti is used when talking about the characters
* Sacco & Vanzetti is used in the external link to the iTunes page because that's what they're calling the film.
I'm still in the process of writing a 'Synopsis' section which I should hopefully have complete by the end of this week. Flourbomb (talk) 18:13, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded article
Talk:Doug Riley

message: I have assessed this as a Stub, as it is only a few sentences long, and of low importance, as I do not believe that many readers outside of Canada would be familiar with the subject of the article. Cheers, CP 15:29, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Doug Rougvie

message: I was at that match, and am pretty sure that Rougvie head butted Carlton Fairweather not Fashanu.
Dreadful reffing BTW to allow Wimbledon to intimidate him - he walked away from a crowd of half a dozen pushing Wimbledon players only to find Fairweather sprint 50 yards to face up to him.  This was after his second fair challenge on future Chelsea keeper, Beasant, neither of which was given as a foul by the ref.  82.19.194.105 (talk) 15:11, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fashanu or Carlton Fairweather
Talk:List of Jack Staff characters

message: I've not read the book (although based on this article, I'm certainly going to rectify that), but looking at all the references he makes to existing British characters, is it possible that the Starfall Squad are based on Dan Dare, Professor Peabody and Sondar?  Daibhid C (talk) 13:29, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Based on?
Talk:Surrey Theatre

message: Most of the existing text from Arthur Lloyd - more sources needed to avoid plagiarism. Kbthompson
:I added some links and info, and the article is better referenced now, but it still needs some attention.  Best regards, -- Ssilvers 20:25, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, as ever ... I did a quick clean up (before), but had to go set up the technical for a lecture on slavery and the sugar trade. Only another 200 theatres to go .... 8^) Kbthompson 23:50, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note
Talk:Trident loop

message: Thanks for adding this page, I'd heard of this knot before but have some concerns regarding the claims made about its actual use as a climbing knot...  I did a Google search for "trident loop" and only got one substantive match, and that was a discussion on rec.crafts.knots from 1998 of the knot's relation to other similar loops/bends.  If this knot were used by "many climbers" I would think that there would be multiple mentions of it, somewhere, on some climbing/caving sites or forums.  The only knot reference I've been able to find this in is Budworth's Complete Book of Knots (1997) and it states only that the knot was "cautiously proposed as an alterative to the figure-eight" loop.  Admittedly this book was published almost 10 years ago, but if it was widely used now I'd expect a much higher-profile in searches.  Are there any climbing references which actually recommend this knot?
And just as an aside, whatever its actual performance characteristics, it seems to me there are many possible wrong ways to tie it and it is difficult to visually inspect (compared to the figure-eight loop) to verify it is correct.  --Dfred 17:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I will try to find my source... it's from a book I had a long time ago. Since I learned the knot, I have talked to climbers who know about the knot, and because of the risks you mentioned, do not use it. If I can't find the book, then perhaps your Budworth book would suffice, and we can remove the comments about usage in climbing.Carlco 20:51, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I reworked the lead to reflect the info I have on it.  It alludes to its proposed use for climbing, but with so many unknowns and possible risks I'm hesitant to leave too strong an indication that it is used regularly by climbers until there's more supporting information.  --Dfred 19:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Many climbers?
Talk:Elephantmen

message: The film section included a claim Ridley Scott expressed interest in filming Elephantmen. I searched for sources but this only seems like speculation and wishful thinking from fans. Removed it, but mentioning here so that it can be added back if a plausible source can be found. -- 109.77.182.123 (talk) 22:35, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film
Talk:Body Bags (comics)

message: Just made a couple of edits, correcting the name of the latest one-shot, not "Body Bags 3: The Hard Way" as stated, the correct is "Body Bags: 3 the Hard Way". Also, the Father's Day two-issue mini-series by Image reprints the original mini-series, it isn't a follow-up.
Majoria 17:52, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 15:52, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:57, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Talk:Dougie Imrie

message: Nice work clearing up that error with Dougie's apparent move to St Johnstone, clearly someone else was listening to Sportsound this afternoon!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DUFCPLAYA (talk • contribs) 15:22, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  St Johnstone 
Talk:Brower's Spring

message: The first time I tried to reconcile this article with GoogleEarth imagery, I thought the article had serious errors. But then I realized there are 2 "Mount Jefferson"s in Montana, and the one this article refers to is the SOUTHERN one (near the Idaho & Wyoming corners). I also found at least 2 other creeks with similar or identical names; the most-prominent one being ~160km (~100mi) ENE near Red Lodge, MT, which has a road & lake named for it. I don't know how to clarify the article without introducing original research, but it needs to be fixed. The coordiates (which I initially overlooked) appear to be reasonably accurate, but not conspicuous enough within the article. Steve8394 (talk) 06:03, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification
Talk:25 ta Life

message: 25 ta Life is not heavy metal in any kind of way, I'm removing this--Kmaster (talk) 16:47, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Heavy Metal

message: they appeared on Prophecy Records "Our Blood, Our Brotherhood".
add that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Virginiasc (talk • contribs) 22:45, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Apparition
Talk:Chouteau

message: The article Chouteau, Oklahoma said that its founders were half-brothers, but this article says they were brothers.  Based on the half-brothers statement I changed the other article to link to the father of the brothers mentioned in this article.  Something needs fixing.  (SEWilco 06:31, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Which fur traders

message: Right now Pierre Chouteau redirects to Jean Pierre Chouteau. This is problematic because Jean Pierre had a son named Pierre who was significant in his own right. Right now Pierre's (red) link says Pierre Chouteau, Jr. but that is inexact because his name was not identical to his father's (as far as I know). Can someone undo the redirect of Pierre Chouteau to Jean Pierre Chouteau, so that the Pierre page can be for the son? 68.40.65.164 03:21, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Once an article is created it creates some mischief to get rid of it.  I redirected it back to Chouteau.  Once the other biography is written we can sort it out (probably by throwing it into its own disambig page)   Americasroof 11:48, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable redirect
Talk:Dov Tiefenbach

message: Don't you think this person has Israeli origins?!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.179.137.89 (talk) 08:44, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Special Name
Talk:ArchEnemies

message: Please source this trivia and re-add to the article. Thanks, Chaz Beckett 17:00, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please source this trivia 
Talk:Sarojini Sahoo

message: Who wrote the sections on Sexuality and Feminism? Their writing is terrible! Please can someone who has read her books edit these awful sections.
128.122.89.58 (talk) 16:17, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, there are no references provided for the analysis of her novels. This requires major clean-up. BananaFiend (talk) 09:50, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Hi Bougeram. Copying from her blog directly into wikipedia is not a great idea. The article should stick to what is known about her work, and a link to the blog can be provided. BananaFiend (talk) 11:37, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Hi .I have added the comment of Linda Lowen about the discussed personality  and removed the previous tag  (Kanu786 (talk) 01:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Note:  Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 02:54, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Orissa Addition 

message: This otherwise interesting article has been tagged for its poor level of copy editing that, ultimately, does a disservice to Sarojini Sahoo. This fine feminist writer deserves better and the tags are there to indicate in a clear and immediate manner the article's major problems. Consistently removing these tags without addressing the problems, of course, will only lead to an administrator locking up the article.
The article needs 1) to be re-written into standard English with 2) reliable sources and footnotes added that meet WIKI's NPOV. Until the level of copy editing has achieved standard English, the tags must not be removed.
Although impossible for me to contribute at present, I look forward to help improving this worthy article in the future. Jumbolino (talk) 12:33, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing tags 

message: I have procured copy right permission  for the images used in this article from the author . This can be varified through permission [Ticket#2010102410000149]Kanu786 (talk) 17:47, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy right permission for Images
Talk:Sanitary engineering

message: I'm proposing that Public health engineering be merged with into this article Sanitary engineering. The former article is a stub and I see no need for it as a standalone article since the contents could easily be merged into this destination article, or left out if it's deemed not notable at all. Any thoughts? Cheers, Rosalina2427 (talk to me) 06:05, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure, because the new article on Public health engineering is specific to India. If merging to the established Sanitary engineering, it could possibly be used for a new section of specific examples from countries around the world, but that in turn would be awkward without other specific examples. It might just be better for the new article about the system in India to be deleted. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:21, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal 

message: The article reads: "In this field 76 percent of those employed have a bachelor's degree, 17 percent have a master's degree and three percent have a post-doctoral degree as of 2013."  
My comments:
1) These numbers not found in the reference.
2) What about just plain PhD's? (Admittedly, many people earning a PhD go do go on to do a Post Doc.)
3) Numbers don't add up to 100%, but some people styling themselves as Sanitary Engineers may not even have a bachelor's degree.Casey (talk) 16:04, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education statistics
Talk:Certified Arborist

message: When I put brackets around the title "Certified Arborist" on other pages it does not create a link to this page; appearantly because of the lower case "a" in arborist in the title of this article.  For the professional title, and licensed tradename, of "Certified Arborist" to be correctly represented in other articles it must be capitalized.  I know it is the style of Wikipedia to capitalize only the first letter of the first word in the title, but in this case, the title of the Wikipedia article is also a professional title and tradename registered to the International Society of Arboriculture and its licensees. ~~ Michael J Swassing 18:06, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: * This should work fine, now. For a formal, recognized title (viz. Certified Public Accountant), there should not be a problem. Regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 17:30, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. WP:TRAINWRECK. Encourage nominator to renominate separately. (closed by non-admin page mover) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 22:30, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 May 2023
Talk:Missouri Headwaters State Park

message: This is a wonderful photograph of the confluence of the Jefferson and the Missouri, from a purely photographic quality standpoint.  But it purports to show the confluence of two rivers.  All I can see is what appears to be a river going around a bend.  There is nothing that indicates to me two rivers.  I would love for someone who lives in the area to take a picture that does a better job of showing the two rivers flowing together. Unschool 03:26, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  High Quality, Poor Utility Photograph
Talk:Donald Strachey

message: (This dialogue is from the film.  It does not appear in the book.  I did not write it.  Not once, in any of the Strachey books, does one of these guys call the other "you bitch."  The first film was promising but the second was wretched and I hold out no hope for the upcoming others.
Richard Stevenson)
* Moved this note to this talk page. Needs checking with the book text. —Ashleyvh (talk) 17:38, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotation and discussion 

message: I would like to create a section on this page devoted to the three supporting characters besides Donald that have appeared in all four of the films, as I don't feel (and surely just about everyone on Wikipedia would agree) that the characters warrant their own individual pages.  The first would be Tim Callahan, who has also appeared in just about every one of the books.  Two other characters, Detective Sean 'Bub' Bailey and Kenny Kwon, were original characters created for the films.  They along with Don and Timmy have appeared in all four film adaptations thus far (keep in mind, it's very possible and even likely that more of the books will be adapted).  I would appreciate if more experienced Wikipedia users would tell me, in their judgement, where is the best place for this section to be placed on this article?  Does it warrant its own new heading, or should it be placed as a sub-heading underneath Donald's introductory section, or perhaps as one underneath the listing of film adaptations released thus far?  Homoaffectional (talk) 05:41, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's weird to see a supporting/recurring characters section under a character's page since the page is about the character, Donald, not about the book series. It may seem more natural if it can be rewritten in a tone of introducing the relationships between those people and Donald like many characters' pages do. I'm willing to do that if nobody disagrees.--Raura (talk) 10:47, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supporting/recurring characters
Talk:Donald Windham

message: On June 17, 2011, The New York Times reported that Yale University was announcing literary prizes in the amount of a million dollars or more annually, funded by a bequest in Windham's will. Publius3 (talk) 01:11, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bequest/Literary prizes 

message: Who cannot adore the line, "Partially because Windham was influenced by his own life..."?  Can the editor who first provided us with this gem provide, as a contrast, a list of writers who were not influenced by their own lives?  While you do NOT have to be gay to write on gay themes, or straight to write on straight themes for that matter, it would be hard to write anything that was devoid of the influences from one's own life in some manner, if not a direct reflection of them.  Can anyone come up with a better wording for this?  Please? 2600:1004:B11E:6A8C:8863:2F17:3201:A9C2 (talk) 00:22, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why gay themes? 

message: More info is needed about Fred Melton. 166.205.101.33 (talk) 23:47, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fred Melton
Talk:Compact Forest Proposal

message: Meet "Compact Forest Proposal " by Brian Eno. Gardener of Geda | Message Me.... 18:11, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First entry
Talk:D. A. Pennebaker

message: This article has multiple issues, as noted in my edit summaries. Claims on Wikipedia have to verified by cited reliable sources. Wikipedia policy is that uncited claims in biographies of living persons may be immediately removed. I've put in cite requests for the moment. As I noted in my edit summaries, Pennebaker is a giant among documentary filmmakers, and deserves better than hypey blurbs with WP:PEACOCK words and an inappropriately aggrandizing tone. Please see these bluelinked Wikipedia policies and guidelines before editing further. -- 207.237.230.157 (talk) 21:57, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that the article needs verifiable citations, and needs to be much better written. I undid all the edits that the anonymous user did today, because I do not believe in anonymous edits.  Having said that, this article does not do justice to the importance that Pennebaker had on late 20th century filmmaking, especially in the United States and Canada. I'll likely do some work on this article, later in April or early May, if no one else does. I'm too busy trying to get a few articles up to FAC this month.Abebenjoe (talk) 03:22, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple issues

message: Three or four films solely by Richard Leacock had found their way into the list of Pennebaker films.  This was an understandable error, since all dated from the period of Leacock-Pennebaker Inc.  For accuracy they have been deleted.  71.167.227.192 (talk) 02:13, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletions from list of films 

message: :File:Suckcess.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
-- Marchjuly (talk) 04:47, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for File:Suckcess.jpg

message: Hello, the link number 5 (http://www.fandango.com/d.a.pennebaker/biography/p106029) seems to be broken and i couldn't find it on internet archives, are there any alternative sources with the same info?--DonGuess (talk) 22:30, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link