lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Three Oaks, Michigan

message: National Public Radio today covered this town's selection of its poet laureate.--Jerzy•t 17:59, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't it be mentioned that the village went broke last year?  The state had to take possession of the finances and all... 35.8.239.47 (talk) 19:19, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bankruptcy 

message: A user edited Three Oaks, Michigan, putting "boner, boner, boner, ...(etc.)" under title "Geography". I removed it by editing the page back to before it was edited by the now deleted user Ticstra123.
Bloffy (talk) 13:11, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Improper Language From Article
Talk:Redshift/Content Moved From Redshift Quantization Dispute June 2006

message: *I've discovered a significant and notable source of criticism on redshift, which I think we should consider including the article. The source is impeccable, and it notes many critics. The source mentions:
*"... many opponents of the Big Bang including Halton Arp" and indeed there do appear to be hundreds of such critics .
*The source also mentions creationists critics, and its primary source does indeed make extensive comments on redshift (there are also a few comments on redshift quantization, but they are not relevent here). A second creationist source provided, also has an associated paper  that also criticises redshift.
*It is estimated that there are some 100+ million creationists in the USA alone, and this must represent a significant view.
*There's also a reference to a group called modern geocentrist, where I note an associated critical paper also on redshift .
*I am a little reluctant to use Web sites as sources, but the empeccable source noted above, seems ok with it. I note that the Cosmological Statement was published in the reputable New Scientists, which I suspect felt that the reliability, and credibility of the original signaturees was notable. About 200 of the other signers all appear associated with academia.
*It does seem odd that we don't have a section on Redshift criticism when there are so many critics. --Iantresman 19:24, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redshift criticism
Talk:Jawbreaker (film)

message: This article sort of reads like an advertisement with phrases like "obviously paying homage to Heathers" & others. The article just needs to be a little more non-partial. I'll try & see what I can do, but if others can help it would be nice.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:40, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the trivia section. Trivia is now discouraged here on wikipedia & the majority of the information was stuff that isn't important to the article. Again, this is NOT a fan page. The summary also needs to be edited since it reads like a fan's perspective. If you can't be non-partial, then don't edit wikipedia. I love the film too, but I'm not going to let it interfere with my editing.10:51, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yah, and somebody could clean up the plot summary which doesn't read too encyclopaedic at the moment and keeps very vague. Try translating the German summary which I just re-wrote ;-)--Zenit (talk) 00:27, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reads like an advert
Talk:GBA Movie Player

message: I have what I hope to be a free image of the M3 DS Simply. Would you like it?  Lmc169 10:24, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  M3 DS Simply Pic 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Herostratus

message: #Oppose Likley to abuse tools per experience on Lolicon. Hipocrite - «Talk» 14:10, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

message: I assume the abortive talk page spamming by support voters will not continue. Hipocrite - «Talk» 20:34, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick look at What Links Here only shows one or two mentions - no mass campaign.  I don't see the problem. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 22:43, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spamming 

message: Here's the chain of events, and even this is a greatly condensed summary:
*There was an editor we'll call the "George Reeves person", an odd duck and an obsessively determined and persistant vandal and just a strange case. Clever, too... dropping the URL of an effective method of disrupting Wikipedia into the (undeletable) edit summaries, etc.
*Anyway, I appointed myself his bete noir, tried many many times to engage him, did the daily revert thing. He was efectively unblockable because his ISP assigns dynamic addresses. No admin was able to suggest anything different. I would have contacted his Internet Service Provider, but I figured he would just get a new one. It was very tedious work.
*At some point the Squidward vandal appeared. In some ways this matched the vow of the George Reeves person to "destroy" Wikipedia; at any rate, some admins became convinced that Squidward and the George Reeves person were the same. He certainly claimed to be. Some of that is here. I myself remain unconvinced, but I'm in a minority.
*You'll note that the other admins became convinced that they knew Squidward/George Reeves person's identity. I believe that's incorrect, and I think it's based on mail headers which is hardly conclusive.
*But I did find the George Reeves person's actual identity, of that I am sure, by another and far more definite method.
*Here's the bad part... I posted it (first initial and last name) at WP:SQUID. Actually I regret that, but on the other hand, the Georges Reeves person was an extremely dedicated vandal, he had made credible threats to never rest until he had uncovered my identity and harmed me any way he could short of breaking the law (and for complicate reasons I am very vulnerable to publicity), he called my ISP, he manifested an insanely obsessive desire to harm Wikipedia however he could, he was represented to me by several admins as being Squidward who was considered a major problem... so how much privacy does the guy rate? Anyway I regretted it pretty much right away, but by then the page was protected and I let it go...
*Anyway, the George Reeves person stopped at once, and it appears to me that Squidward stopped at almost the same time; at least, WP:SQUID went from daily activity to complete stasis. So maybe they are the same person.
*If they are, it was I who stopped Squidward. That should be worth something, I guess. Herostratus 22:29, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Squidward
Talk:Universal coefficient theorem

message: Riveting stuff. Can't think why there's no discussion. --Northener 18:13, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Could someone please explain what 'expected' result means in "which could be thought of as the 'expected' result"? Randomblue (talk) 12:06, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the "expected" claim, since it's obviously POV and mathematically irrelevant. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 02:53, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The trouble with simply removing all and any heuristic remarks is fairly obvious, though: it reduces the chance that anyone who doesn't already know what is going on will find out. Such remarks are only "irrelevant" to the experts, in other words. Mathematical article here already lean too far towards the "preaching to the converted" approach. The needs of the general reader should be considered, and language that would be appropriate in a survey article should not just be culled, in my view. Charles Matthews (talk) 09:02, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify 

message: This page should include examples from complex algebraic geomtry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.138.65.246 (talk) 02:19, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Examples
Talk:DX-pedition

message: This article should be broken into sections.--Kharker 18:13, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: This article, and articles that point here, use two different spellings, DXpedition and DX-pedition. A preferred spelling should be chosen and used for the article's title, with a redirect page for the other name. David spector (talk) 01:35, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyphen?
Talk:Leonotis

message: Since when have the Iroquois been using a plant that was native to India and Africa? Can anyone back up this statement? Sakurambo 19:26, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind. I found a reference here . Sakurambo 18:44, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iroquois?? 

message: Maybe information on Leonotis leonurus should be moved to its own page and information on the genus Leonotis should be kept here? It seems like this page has been used for the species because someone pointed all the species names to it. I think I'm going to start working on that unless anyone objects. Bobertlo 05:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization 
Talk:Nathaniel Bar-Jonah

message: Dr. John C. Espy writes in "Eat the Evidence: A Journey Through the Dark Boroughs of a Pedophilic Cannibal's Mind" on page 4, the following:
"David Paul Brown, who on March 22, 1984 changed his name to Nathaneal Benjamin Levi Bar Jonah..."
This is usage is repeated innumerable times throughout the book, and never is Nathaniel used. Also, a picture of one of Bar Jonah's own flyers for his "teddy bear, cast metal, and collectable [sic] toy show" is shown on page 121 of the book, and he himself has his name spelled Nathaneal Bar Jonah.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:40D:C102:7840:CD0D:C6C4:B1CF:5B51 (talk) 03:11, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The New York Times and the Associated Press seem to disagree.  General Ization Talk    03:14, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

text: Bar-Jonah could spell it any way he wanted, but apparently his legally registered first name was Nathaniel.  I think we can agree that the state ofSupreme Court of  Montana would not have misspelled his legal name in deciding his 2004 appeal. General Ization Talk    03:33, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Further, Espy seems to be the only source that uses the -eal spelling. The guidelines on article titles say to go with the name used in most reliable sources; given the media sources, and also considering the court records, that would seem to be -iel. —C.Fred (talk) 03:47, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name is Nathaneal Bar Jonah, not Nathaniel Bar Jonah
Talk:Old School (Danger Doom song)

message: Has anyone noticed that the music of this song is the same as the music that plays in Kill Bill Vol. 1? You hear it at the beginning of the movie when it says "Our Feature Presentation". When I first saw this, I thought it was pretty cool because I had had the album and loved the song. Check it out, and if you think it's a relevant piece of info, add it to the page.
* The song that's mixed is "Funky Fanfare" by Keith Mansfield.
** It's also used in Grindhouse between flicks.  Excellent! 63.145.155.66 17:36, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Killer Beat 
Talk:List of Fawlty Towers episodes

message: This episode guide was moved from the main Fawlty Towers page. Bob, 18:34, 14 June 2006 UTC
2nd series airdate confusion :-
The original airdate of the 2nd series is given in the table as 1976, all the text says 1979. I'm pretty sure the table should read 1979, yes ?Alanperkins 06:13, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems like 1979 is correct.  See here for example. - Peregrinefisher 06:20, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

text: It was called "Fire Drill" on the LP record. I don't think there were ever official episode names, but the ones used on the videos/DVDs are most well known ("The Germans" in that case) so we might as well use those.. Peter Ballard (talk) 05:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode guide

message: I apologise if my recent edit to the synopsis of The Kipper and the Corpse seems to lack taste, but this is the synopis I have seen in regard to this episode and thought that it was worth adding. 86.130.222.13 (talk) 23:31, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edit

message: Why is the episode "The Robber" not included?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spiny R Wels (talk • contribs) 13:55, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''The Robber''
Talk:List of films by Éric Rohmer

message: *Support.  The lists are a useful supplement to the article on Rohmer, but we don't need two separate articles.  Slowmover 18:34, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal with [[List of other fictions by Eric Rohmer]]

message: Perhaps the author meant "feature films"? Otherwise, please define "fiction film". Thanks - ♥ Her Pegship♥ 17:33, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I think he means "non-documentary", "non-feature" films.  The films listed are short films or films made for TV which are not educational or documentaries (hence "fiction").  They exclude all the well-known theatrical feature films, which are found in the list of familiar titles in the main Eric Rohmer article. -- Slowmover 18:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fiction films?
Talk:St. Peter's Preparatory School

message: Just some factual corrections need to be performed on the page. The school colors are wrong and the website is wrong. The website has been shortened to spprep.org and the school colors are maroon and silver not maroon and white. Can someone please update the page as I do not know how thanks
BTShep (talk) 15:12, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  June 2011 factual updates 
Talk:Dublin, Pennsylvania

message: I am curious about the last line of the overview:
The local tavern, The Dublin Inn, is known for it's highly unpopular, scumbag owner. The man is white trash.
Doesn't this violate the neutrality of Wikipedia?
FelisLachesis 18:40, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Chilkoot Pass

message: I think that this contribution helped expand this topic, and as an editor, it was a very good job. Obviously an exceptional amount of research was done and it shows. The amount of references is also a good indicator of how much research was done. All the references seem credible and relate to the topic very well. One criticism I have is that fact that there is a lot of headings that only have a few sentences. I feel as if they could be combined and some of them to be simplified a bit. It would make the article flow better if they were pooled together. I like how well the geography is described and how there is a picture to accommodate. From reading this article the grammar and punctuation is well done and I have not caught any major mistakes. One other example of what would help this article would be adding a map or something that visually shows the reader where the Chilkoot Pass is. Other than these few minor details I found this article is very interesting and I feel more knowledgeable after reading it. Especially seeing as I did not have any idea where or what this Chilkoot Pass was before reading this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanissteinbach (talk • contribs) 16:23, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  HIST 208 Peer Review 

message: If it is possibly, I want to change the lines about the indian packers who only charged 1 cent per pound. From first hand source materials we know that at least in 1897 and early 1898 the indian packers dictated the prices - and they absolutly knew what their labor was worth. At the beginning of the rush they demanded 9 cents per pound. In October 1897 it raised to 25 cents per pound. (source: Kathryn Morse, The Nature of Gold, University of Washington Press, 2003, pp. 69-74.)
92.75.44.141 (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  packing charges 
Talk:White House press corps

message: The WHCA represents journalists and while not all correspondents are members they are an agency that works within the press corps. Recommend merging as was done previously. Michael-Moates (talk) 05:47, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[White House Correspondents' Association]] into [[White House press corps]] 

message: The text "The following outlets have had reporters covering the White House full time" is followed by a list of 45 humans and zero outlets. If there ever is an actual list of outlets, it would be useful to know when they were given a chair in the press briefings. Silversplash (talk) 07:03, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of outlets
Talk:ESPN2HD

message: Since someone added the unreferenced tag at the beginning of the article, I was wondering if anyone knows of some way to substantiate the statements in the article. I was especially wondering how one would prove the availability of ESPN2HD? Who else besides Dish people can get the network?   — Chris Capoccia  T⁄C 18:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations
Talk:Emppu Vuorinen

message: How is he "known for his height"? 165 cm isn't that short. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.222.32.66 (talk) 18:48, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your opinion doesn't matter here; he is often cited for being the "short guy".—♦♦ SʘʘTHING(Я) 18:50, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Empuu is well known for being very short; this isn't just an opinion. I didn't write this article but I am a huge fan. He is very small for an adult man. However, the wording of that part could be tidied up a little bit. (Neostinker 18:59, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Height

message: I have upgraded the class of this page, in order to adhere to the guidelines specified on Biography Assessement page. 
:MstrControl 22:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Updgrade in Class

message: To an anglophone with no knowledge of Finnish, his three formal forenames are recognisably versions of names also used in English and other languages. However, his nickname "Emppu" isn't, and other than guessing (probably incorrectly) that it derives in part from his first two initials E. M., I have no clue what it might mean. Can anyone add a cited explanation? {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 2.125.72.102 (talk) 18:45, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of "Emppu"? 

message: I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for creating the article! I hope you will write more articles. Have a blessed day!
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:47, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feedback from New Page Review process
Talk:City of Caterpillar

message: This article should mention something about their breakup (which I know nothing about, unfortunately). It is kind of odd that everything is in the past tense and it isn't mentioned. Recury 18:54, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Recury 15:51, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: i couldn't help noticing that the intro text to this article is entirely copied and pasted from their last.fm page.
maybe someone could rephrase(retype) it.--Nirvanarox55 (talk) 17:08, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  last.fm 

message: This article seems particularly weak. Beyond using no citations, it does very little to substantiate its validity as legitimate wikipedia article. While I agree that this article be kept because of the band's significance, i dont think the article meets quality standards, and does no job whatsoever of justifying this band's importance to the development of its genre, or its impact on bands that followed. It seems to be nothing more than an introduction to a bio page on their website, or a favorable review by pitchfork.
--Panzerschreck1 (talk) 14:31, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality
Talk:Claude Davis

message: This is a new artice. I cannot find any other reference to this person in wikpedia. I researched the article myself. Please do not remove. Thanks. --User:Hawksworthm 19:01, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hawksworthm is a member of :Wikipedia:WikiProject Football, and has been editing since 10th feb 2006, I note that on 10 June 2006 TigerShark deleted "Claude Davis" as reposted content - originally deleted as copyvio (9th deletion). I was unable to find a site that the current article might be a copyvio of and shall remove the speedy tags. I trust Hawksworthm and the project will ensure against any creep back to copyvio. --Alf melmac 19:28, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was looking for a reference to verify the number of caps that Claude Davis has for Jamaica. The Jamaica Football Federation shows 56 caps, which is rather more than the 47 quoted in the article. Which is the true figure? Can anyone confirm?  Cheers, --Malcolmxl5 19:51, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think 47 is the correct figure. Soccerbase has 47, and they are very reliable for stats. The Derby County Official Website is also saying 47 caps. hawksworthm 02:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: International caps

message: Added a bit of infomation about the game on 11/04/09, it has recieved a good bit of news coverage. I think the way ive phrased it is neutral and in keeping with the reference (bbc), i know i used weasel words with reference to cardiffs opinion, but that was the way its put in the references. Any ideas on how I could phrase it better? Bacchus87 (talk) 21:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Johnson Incident 
Talk:John Bevis

message: I replaced the old birth date by the information from the Royal Society list of fellows (PDF), which should be a reliable source.--TomR 19:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there any research about John Bevis' family line?  My mother's maiden name is Bevis, also, a tower at Arundel Castle on Britain's south coast is the Bevis Tower, named after a knight who is an ancestor of mine.  It would be interesting to see if John is one of my direct ancestors. GBC (talk) 06:26, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family & descendants? 

message: Any idea as to where he died? The SEDS page mentioned it was "from injuries" after falling off his telescope, but it doesn't mention where. CielProfond (talk) 12:49, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of death
Talk:Erasmus Haworth

message: Erasmus Haworth is notable in the discovery of helium in natural gas. The following is copied from helium, and should be culled for integrating information into this article:
:After an oil drilling operation in 1903 in Dexter, Kansas, USA produced a gas geyser that would not burn, Kansas state geologist Erasmus Haworth collected samples of the escaping gas and took them back to the University of Kansas at Lawrence where, with the help of chemists Hamilton Cady and David McFarland, he discovered that the gas contained, by volume, 72% nitrogen, 15% methane—insufficient to make the gas combustible, 1% hydrogen, and 12% of an unidentifiable gas.Emsley, Nature's Building Blocks, 179 With further analysis, Cady and McFarland discovered that 1.84% of the gas sample was helium. Far from being a rare element, helium was present in vast quantities under the American Great Plains, available for extraction from natural gas.
—Centrx→Talk 19:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, among other things. . —Centrx→talk • 06:46, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discovery of helium in natural gas