lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Silent House

message: *Keep: I created the page for Silent House as it's notable when a song is commercially produced by more than one artist, and that's the case here. Additionally, there are many individual songs that have articles created for them, in particular, many by Linkin Park and Panic! at the Disco. As it states in the WP:ALBUMS project page, pages about songs themselves are fine, but don't expect anybody else to go and create them (paraphrased, but that's the gist of it). As I've said, this song bears note due to its origins. I'm not advocating all songs ever written to be given their own page, but due to the unique nature of the song's dual recording, it's notableto be given its own page. I have only just created the page and intend to expand on the it to bring it up to a standard level (at least bring it up to start class, if not greater). I should also note that there's no specific guidelines for notability for songs and singles (see here). To prove this point, a song that only reached #28 in the charts not only has its own page, but it is given on the WP:SONGS page a guideline (see here). --lincalinca 13:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it seems I didn't need to say all that. Irrespective, if this page's notability comes into question again, my argument still stands. --lincalinca 13:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: afd
Talk:Irene Xavier

message: This has no citations and one of the external links is a self-published writing. Wikipedia is not for political or special interest agendas.--AhmedFaizP (talk) 16:22, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be deleted 
Talk:Old Senate Chamber

message: Also, I note that the Origins and use section does not mention what the chamber is used for present-day.  It would be interesting to include this information.  Are any hearings held there, or is it now just for show? Robert K S 16:20, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins and use 

message: In his great novel "Burr" Gore Vidal yu77777buyvyt(Tomcat Oebele jumped on keys to send his regards) describes the old Senate chamber as "still with it's portraits of Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette". This intrigued me... were there portraits of these sponsors of American indenpendance on the wall of the Senate? When were they removed? Do they still exist? Gore Vidal is a very exact and knowledgeable writer. It it is not something that he would have made up like a minor character in the novel.
I was intrigued and checked Wikipedia but it wasn't there, who knows more about it?
Robert Prummel (talk) 13:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The French monarchs in the United States Senate 

message: On 6 April 1989, the Senate convened for a special celebration of the 200th anniversary of when the Senate began work. This special meeting convened in the old chamber. Eventually they recessed to continue the session in the regular chamber. My point is that it might be good idea to mention this special meeting on the page since it convened in the old chamber. 2600:1700:7DC1:5810:A1A9:49C1:E1A0:A77D (talk) 01:24, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of the Chamber for the Senate's 200th anniversary
Talk:Bidriware

message: Hello, there's another article on the same stuff. Someone fix this please. I don't have much time...
76.173.120.232 (talk) 03:05, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: merged.  RJFJR (talk) 19:44, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 
Talk:Precipitation types

message: This is the stupidest thing i've heard, but is caused when convection occurs where the surface of the atmosphere becomes heated or hotter than normal...". The atmosphere does not have a surface, although it does have an interface with the earth's surface. Perhaps it should say "...where the surface of the earth becomes heated..."  Chimpex 20:49, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I intend to merge convection rain, convectional recipitation, and cyclonic precipitation into this article.  These concepts are important, but there isn't enough information here to support individual articles.  I also intend to clean up and source the information as I do this.  Does anyone have any suggestions or problems with this?   Pilotbob 18:14, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a subarticle of precipitation (meteorology), and therefore should be a more complete treatment of the topic than the main article.  This helps the main article keep from becoming too long.  Thegreatdr (talk) 06:10, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: The article was in poor condition; I cleaned it up as best I could, including the text, pictures, and captions.  However, some of the text was so garbled that I couldn't figure out what it was trying to say, so I've flagged the article for expert help. It's not at all clear how this article relates to the other meteorology articles, but I suspect that it should be better linked, integrated, or merged.  Reify-tech (talk) 17:33, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Irma Boom

message: Your sources are put in great context. One of the things I would change is the title for boom. You can possibly put her title as the early years of her accomplishments and then break it up into two sections with her early years and then her late years. Or you can put what she has accomplished at the end of the page and what awards she has won. Overall great work.Cpm22 (talk) 04:19, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review 
Talk:Irving S. Shapiro

message: Is he really important enough to have a page on Wikipedia? SkepticBanner (talk) 06:20, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is he really important enough? 

message: Given the powerful influence of Dupont in the latter half of the 20th century, and the fact that Irving Shapiro was the first non-Dupont to head what had previously been an all-family enterprise, I think he merits an entry. This is all the more true in our increasingly oligarchic present, when understanding the history of American corporations helps in understanding the unprecedented influence of international corporations, now including Dupont, on our society today.
Shapiro himself was a a much bigger deal in the 20th century than in the 21st, so preserving and expanding his entry saves that bit of history for us, and for some future historian who might find here the missing piece of some crucial work.
Fortunately Wikipedia is not going to run out of pages, so people can and do create articles on much more obscure figures than this captain of industry who some credit with saving Dupont.
I have cleaned up the links and added references and sources, so anyone who is moved to write more about Shapiro will have a solid place to start.
Many thanks to Wikipedia for unjudgmentally preserving our history and acting as our collective memory.
Calogera (talk) 23:52, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yes
Talk:Service-oriented analysis and design

message: The article appears focused on (a) describing IBM as the owner of this process, and (b) showcasing Mr. Erl.  There have been dozens of books on Service Oriented design.  While I cannot state which came first, at present, it is clear that any representation of Mr. Erl being "first" is not useful to the discussion of the process itself.
--Nickmalik 13:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

message: I redirected this article to Service-oriented modeling, because:
* This article was just an other explaination of Service-oriented methodology
* Refering only to other Service-oriented methodology articles.
* So in fact this article was a Service-oriented dead end. 
* This article just summarized, what other Wikipedia articles already explained. 
If there was any new text with new references, I guess I missed it. It can have been more than one chapter, which might as well be added to the Service-oriented modeling article.
-- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 13:09, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article merged/redirected 

message: I have removed a large quantity of what I consider inline linspam. This article looked like an advertisment with all that links. Even so there seemed to be some fake inline references. These think are unacceptable for me. I hope with removing these links this problem is solved here. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 01:21, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inline linkspam
Talk:Ishak Haji Muhammad

message: All of the content I've added to the page was translated directly from the Malay wiki page on the same topic. Kakikukekok 08:02, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation from Malay wiki

message: Added further content from newspaper articles. Cleaned up translation of terms. 124.82.172.134 09:14, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: further additions
Talk:Ishtori Haparchi

message: Is that really a name he is known under? It only seems to show up in the context of Shiloh. I'm afraid it might be a plain mistake. If indeed it is one, the automatic link should be removed, and the article thete corrected. Cheers, Arminden (talk) 15:44, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nestorius?
Talk:Two Peoples Bay Nature Reserve

message: Is the article about the nature reserve (the article title) or the bay (the bold text in the lead sentence)? The article title and lead sentence should be consistent. Mitch Ames (talk) 12:31, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Could have fixed that one yourself, it's pretty obvious what the article is about. Hughesdarren (talk) 13:30, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bay or nature reserve
Talk:Ithamar (bishop)

message: I've removed a large section as a copyvio. I'll attempt to get the article it was the synopsis of and get the information entered into the article at some point. Ealdgyth | Talk 04:15, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Briefly reworked, will look up the article later! Ealdgyth | Talk 04:19, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible copyvio
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Gothador

message: Keep
This is definitely a topic that needs to stay in Wikipedia and I have a number of reasons why.  For clarity's sake, I will list them in a neat and concise fashion.
In rebuttal to the Google argument, I provide a link to a Google search page that lists a number of Gothador finds, far above 10 hits, even more than 10 pages of hits.  The link is here:  []
In rebuttal to the Speedy Delete for no assertion of notability, I offer the following argument, taken directly from the Gothador Forum.  "Our users have posted a total of 542800 articles  We have 103976 registered users"  If that does not speak of notability, there isn't much that is going to.  Over one hundred thousand people agree that Gothador is note-worthy.
The MMORPG of Gothador and it's conjoined forum have an intricate relationship that most would not and could not find in any RPG on the web.  The comradery that this game has create spans the globe and that doesn't stop the creators of the game from participating in the game themselves.  Other MMORPG games, in my opinion, should take a business lesson from Hunted Cow Studios as they provided weekly updates, consistant upgrades and 24 hour live support, all in the hopes of better helping their subscribers enjoy their online gaming experience to the fullest.
Were Wikipedia to delete the article on Gothador, it would diminish Wikipedia for the loss of information.  With over one hundred thousand registered users that participate in Gothador, the loss of readers to this search engine would be noticeable.
This decision should not be made based on what a few people's frustrations have shown.  This decision should be made fairly and impartially, and I would hope that, before the decision is made, Wikipedia would investigate the matter themselves.  Gothador offers a two-week trial membership, and I would hope that two weeks would be enough time to show the necessity for a Wikipedia listing.
--NytDunne 13:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wonder if the recently created User:Truffers will drop by and make a comment based entirely round the flawed argument of WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS and WP:ILIKEIT? DarkSaber2k 14:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:FlyWhoosh

message: White Eagle Aviation no longer flies for Flywhoosh project. Buying there tickets is a serious risk.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.220.48.42 (talk) 16:47, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  White Eagle Aviation 

message: The page here says that FlyWhoosh's fleet is only one. Does anyone know what type of plane it is? Its obviously not a boeing 747, but what is it? How many does it hold, what model etc? I think this information would be useful. Codu (t)⁄(c) •  12:47, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plane Type 

message: I removed the references to Newquay as a destination as it doesn't appear to be a valid destination at the moment, according to the FlyWhoosh website. It isn't included in the list of destination airports on either the dropdown box on the 'book a flight' option nor on the destinations page.  I checked the Newquay Airport website as well and it's not mentioned on there. I've emailed the company for clarification and will be happy to revert if I'm wrong. --Whoosher 20:56, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newquay 

message: Just for information here is a copy of a message and my reply  from my talk page by 81.178.222.149 Hi - I don't know if you have a link to Flywhoosh.  You cannot remove factual information relating to the current government investigation into Flywhoosh and it is NPOV to quote Flywhoosh claiming restart possibilities which are impossible in the light of these investigations.   
:I have not connection with any airline, a strange accusation from an IP user that has only ever edited Flywhoosh and White Eagle articles. As my edit summary stated I removed information from that made Wikipedia appear to be either a company or government website. If you can find a citable source for the trading standards investigation you are welcome to add it, the restart quote is not NPOV it is what Flywhoosh are stating on their website. MilborneOne (talk) 10:48, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What Flywhoosh state on their website is not a valid source since they have taken customer's money dishonestly (as WEA state). Do not be fooled by them. I have letters from Solihull in my possession confirming the investigation. Phone the CAA if you want further confirmation of what is going on (020 7453 63330).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.178.222.149 (talk) 10:57, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK I have added a bit about the investigation to the article (with a ref) but please note that Wikipedia is not a soapbox and also be carefull of WP:COI. Please note wikipedia article do not have opinions they just state verifiable facts. MilborneOne (talk) 11:01, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Flywhoosh
Talk:Ivan Moskvitin

message: The standard English sources contradict each other and only Lantzeff and Pierce give Moskvitin more than a paragraph. The sources in the Russian wiki also have many contradictions and omissions. As of March 2012 this article was built from the sources noted in the Russian wiki and does not document all the contradictions.  The article needs to be completely re-written from a monograph by someone who has studied the original documents. Benjamin Trovato (talk) 04:22, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy
Talk:Jadon

message: The section regarding Jadon as a Hindu clan name is a word-for-word duplicate of the article Jadaun.  Either Jadaun should be changed into a redirect to Jadon, or the information about the Hindu clan name in Jadon should be changed into a link to Jadaun.  And the clan name section really needs some references.  It's basically totally unsourced right now. PubliusFL 14:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have asked  (who added the Hindu text) about this on his talk page, but he continues to treat those two articles as two distinct articles.  I think that the article Jadon should only have the text about the Hebrew meaning, plus a pointer to Jadaun.  This makes it easier to maintain the two articles; also, according to njadaun's edit, "Jadaun" seems to be slightly preferable to "Jadon" as the article name for the Hindu concept. --Austrian 17:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes sense to me.  I would agree with that course of action. PubliusFL 18:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Ivor Jennings

message: Hello everyone. I am just reading David Marchbanks' book The Painted Ship: An Account of the Fire at Sea Aboard the Greek Liner ʻLakoniaʻ, published in 1964. It is about the burning and sinking of the cruise steamer TSMS Lakonia in December 1963. The book mentions that Sir Jennings, his wife (the former Helen Emily Konsalik), and one their daughters, Mrs. Claire Jennings Dewing, where survivors. Can anyone confirm this? And if it is a fact, shouldn't it be added to the article? Regards, OfficeBoy (talk) 14:17, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wife
Talk:J. Clifford Hudson

message: Erasing redirect to Sonic Corp page.
Jeremy112233 (talk) 22:03, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A request was made at WikiProject Biography to assess this article. I have reviewed it and rated the current version as C-class. Issues that you may want to look at to take this to B-class are:
*The lead is too short. As a rough guide I would suggest having a sentence for every major section. On the current size of the article you should be aiming for 3 or 4 sentences.
*Some of the citations do not list the publisher and/or the author. This makes it harder to judge the quality of the sourcing.
*There is a heavy reliance on primary source material - for example, statements about Sonic Corp appear to rely on websites related to Sonic Corp. There is nothing inherently wrong with that, but the referencing would be stronger if you could find equivalent third party sources.
*The article is fairly glowing with praise, which suggests it may be a little unbalanced. This could be a symptom of using too many primary sources. If the third party sources you find still support the same balance of material then there isn't a problem.
I hope these points are of assistance. Good luck. Road Wizard (talk) 20:28, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: September 2012 assessment

message: I am the corporate archivist for Sonic in Oklahoma City.  I am suggesting change to Cliff Hudson's photo because this one is a more up-to-date image of him.  The sub title under the current photo would be best deleted since this new photo is not at a Sonic Drive-In.  I am including the info that is posted below the photo and it includes a small change in his title. He has since become the President of the company and it would seem remiss of me to not mention that.
Born: 1954, Dallas, Texas, U.S. 
Residence: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, U.S. 
Nationality:  American 
Alma mater:  University of Oklahoma, Georgetown University
Occupation:  Chairman, President and CEO of Sonic  Corp. 
Spouse(s):  Leslie Hudson
The new photo is one of him at a speaking engagement and we have complete rights to the image.
SonicMint (talk) 19:34, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested Image Edit
Talk:J. Daniel Mahoney

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/John Daniel Mahoney was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:J. Mark Ramseyer

message: This is a bio page, and these new sections, focusing on a single paper, seems excessive and inappropriate, especially when the paper is already noted and adequately summarized in other sections.
I suggest the editor Wiwa Steve create a separate page for the paper if s/he feels the paper is notable enough.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.23.87.18 (talk) 19:33, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Sections "Contracting for Sex in the Pacific War" and "Criticism of the paper and argument" 

message: — Assignment last updated by GumTreeKookabura (talk) 17:58, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Remembering the Asia Pacific War
Talk:Grand Prix Hassan II

message: The official site claims that the 2010 edition was the 26th Grand Prix Hassan II. The article and the navigational template show it being held every year since 1986 with no tournament in 1991, which makes a total of 24. Were there another two possibly smaller tournaments before 1986, or were there two possibly smaller tournaments in the same year as another one, or has the official site miscounted? Coyets (talk) 16:08, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of establishment
Talk:Jack Ackroyd

message: other than the simalar name and interest in police topics?cmacd 14:07, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  is there a relation to Dan? 

message: This article almost got deleted because it is currently poorly written.  Here's what needs to be done to clean it up and bring it close to a B class article:
1) Infobox; 2) Picture; 3) A look at his policing tactics, in the wake of the 1981 Toronto bathhouse raids, 4)What his accomplishments were at the Liquor Control Board of Ontario. Some of this information is available free on the net, but most is either in pay for use archives, like the Toronto Star, or in paper or microfiche files at the Toronto Reference Library. Feel free to contribute and make this a better article. Abebenjoe 03:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article clean-up 
Talk:Jack Hooper (intelligence officer)

message: Is this the same man as "Assistant Director William Hooper", I wonder? Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead)  02:57, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jack Judge

message: This doesn't really reference the dispute with Harry Williams at all, though it was significant in his life. Beyondheat (talk) 22:10, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harry Williams
Talk:Jack Kister

message: This book:    (The System Engineer's Handbook) is now a reference here, it does have a VME bus history page in the backmatter.  I was able to read that text by going here: , searching for "Kister", and then clicking through the result link.  --j⚛e deckertalk 07:28, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I still don't think that it makes him notable, but I'm not going to take it any further. The-Pope (talk) 09:22, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref to System Engineer's Handbook
Talk:Jackson Kaujeua

message: Jackson Kaujeua died this morning. Rest in Peace.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.44.150.15 (talk) 07:04, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jacob Sullum

message: First, this is foolish and trivial to include. It is no more relevant to this entry than what sort of car he drives. Second, it is subject to change, and so already may not be true. Delete. Nicmart (talk) 17:35, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 cats and a dog. 

message: Sullum holds many views. His general point of view is libertarian, and it should be sufficient to have mention of that rather than enumerating his positions unless there is a justification for doing so, such as one of his columns becoming the subject of national discussion. Nicmart (talk) 17:38, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Views
Talk:Jacob Tonson

message: The painting illustrating this section is a portrait of Jacob Tonson's nephew, who's name was also Jacob Tonson.   The correct Kneller portrait for this article can be viewed at this link to the National Portrait Gallery:
http://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/portrait.php?mkey=mw06361
This is a minor problem with an otherwise good article.
161.45.205.180 (talk) 20:30, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Kneller painting 

message: * support; Tonson is just an inferior summary of Jacob Tonson. m.e. (talk) 07:34, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge
Talk:British Chess Magazine

message: The article does not need to show four covers from 2011 that are basically the same, except for the photo.  One good one will suffice.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 00:34, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many covers! 