lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:X.25

message: In the movie Father of the Bride, the groom's character is a consultant who helps European banks link their x.25 networks with US-based banks' IP networks. Does this merit inclusion in the article? Jaysbro 20:26, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not, unless that fact is significant other than something mentioned in passing; I suspect most viewers of the movie would have little idea what an X.25 network is, and would only know what an IP network is because they might have seen references to "TCP/IP" in articles or in the parts of the UI of their computer that they don't like to use. :-) Guy Harris 00:18, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture 

message: How many of the protocols listed there were expected to run primarily or solely over X.25?  Most stuff above the transport layer was presumably supposed to run over the OSI transport layer protocols, not over X.25; were the transport protocols expected to run directly above X.25, or above OSI network-layer protocols? Guy Harris 00:21, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  X.25 protocols vs. OSI protocols 

message: Is it worth mentioning that the over the air interface for Mobitex is based around X.25?
http://www.leapforum.org/published/internetworkMobility/split/node118.html
Jonnyct 15:22, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mobitex 

message: Does NGN (All IP) threaten to force the replacement of X.25 and similar non-IP protocols? My experience which such technologies is minimal so this may be an incorrect assumption of mine.
:While there are assorted definitions of NGN, most assume highly reliable optical transmission media. X.25 remains a viable technique in certain media with high error rate, long delay, and low speed, including poor-quality landlines, amateur radio, some satellite links, etc. Howard C. Berkowitz 16:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  X.25 Today: NGN threat? 

message: These sections are horrible.  They make assertions that conflict with common knowlege and the assertions made in other articles (Packet switched network and TCP/IP model) and verifiable sources (will be cited on rework).  They use the wrong terminology (level 2 and level 3, instead of link layer and packet layer) and conflict with the primary documents X.25 and X.223.  I intend to rework all three sections. — Dgtsyb (talk) 09:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plan to rework History, Architecture and Relation to OSI Model sections 

message: The whole X.25 article needs to be re-written. As my data comm instructor used to beat into my head - X.25 is a DCE <-> DTE interface ... nothing more nothing less.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zslg01 (talk • contribs) 20:16, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  X.25 is an ''INTERFACE'' standard - not a standard for WANs, LANs, or anything else
Talk:Simon de Vlieger

message: "Simon de Vlieger (c. 1601–1653) was a Dutch designer, daughtsman, and painter, most famous for his marine paintings."
a daughtsman? a player of daughts? or perhaps a draftsman... pauli 12:24, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Typo for draughtsman. Gdr 12:32, 2005 May 11 (UTC)
The block of text seems to be copied from somewhere. I have no idea who wrote that text. Does anybody know where it comes from?Taksen (talk) 11:47, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ecological wisdom

message: I'm not really happy that the ecologically consciousness of green parties is equalled in this article with "ecosophy", something that in my view is more a philosophical concept or, if seen political, linked to "deep ecology" politics. Maybe the link in the template should be replaced by something like political ecology, and this article could be integrated into deep ecology? -- till we ☼☽ | Talk 10:05, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what your objection is.  The article, as it currently reads, gives the origin of the term (first used by Arne Naess) and goes on to explain that the green parties have adopted the term.  Two facts.  Green parties surely can't deny the origin of the term nor its etymological roots (sophy is from sophia meaning wisdom).  Sunray 06:51, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Deep ecology or green politics?

message: If ecological wisdom is the same as Ecosophy, as the first sentence implies, why have two separate articles? Pfly 06:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ecosophy
Talk:Einar

message: There is a Wikipedia article on a person whose name Wikipedia spells "Einar Skinnarland" but the editing/updating-"bot" is broken and has not put Einar Skinnarland into this list here. Christopher L. Simpson 2600:1700:6759:B000:1C64:8308:33BC:E2D6 (talk) 09:07, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Einar Skinnarland is missing
Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppetry/Proposal

message: It is my understanding that users and not accounts *are* held responsible for their actions.  The only place I've ever seen the contrary assumed is in this proposal.  I'm sure if you take a look at arbcom decisions, administrator and editor actions in response to known or suspected sock puppets, there is never even the breath of suggestion that (to give a concrete example) someone using a sock should be permitted to perform more than three reverts in a twenty-four hour period because the sock reverts count as a different account being used.
As a practical matter where a known sock is involved in abuse I normally block all the socks for an offence by any one of them. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 12:37, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Fortunately IP addresses alone aren't the only evidence used in determining whether an account is a sock puppet.  Shared proxies should be identified in the normal way.  There will undoubtedly be cases where a parent is blocked because he's using NAT to share a single internet connection and his kids go vandalizing Wikipedia, but that already happens.  We tend to deal with such cases individually using email. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 13:53, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

text: I agree in principle.  Let me see if I understand: If a user account is also used as a sock-puppet in the above methods, they would be forwarded to the two authorities for some kind of punishment.  What could be wrong with that? - Tεxτurε 22:41, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is this proposal necessary?
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-05-09/In the news

message: Although Foxtrot appears on the web, it is not really a web comic. Foxtrot is nationally syndicated and appears in many American newspapers. Sayeth 13:32, May 11, 2005 (UTC)
:Ah, right - wasn't sure, never heard of it on this side of the pond!  I'll change it now. Worldtraveller 13:56, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Didn't mind at all, Knowledge Seeker.  Thanks very much for spotting my mistake and correcting it. Worldtraveller 07:04, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

text: Well, maybe I've been dealing with too much vandalism recently and have started to see it everywhere :) but I thought the point of the third box was that the kid had uploaded a picture of their sister to the warthog article.  I am completely unfamiliar with the strip and the kind of humour it normally goes in for, so please feel free to make any revisions to my text there that you think are appropriate. Worldtraveller 07:04, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: On further inspection, I think you're right. I suppose my (mis)interpretation of the strip (that the other character was simply comparing his sister to a warthog) was influenced by my preconceptions, because the last time I saw a FoxTrot strip (quite a few years ago) it seemed a bit "soft"—that is, the humour was jejune to the point of sterility. I didn't expect it to depict (even if indirectly) something shady like the defacement of public website. I just checked the FoxTrot article (which I should have done prior to commenting!) and it seems placing a picture of his sister in the warthog/rabies article is completely in-character. Oh well.. sorry for bothering you. -- Hadal 09:39, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Microwave power transmission

message: Kyoto university has a group dealing with MPT, see the ( somewhat outdated ) overview of the ongoing reseaarch here:
http://www.kurasc.kyoto-u.ac.jp/jusps/KA-1.pdf
they have powered a flight experiment ( MILAX ) with a MPT and appear to be the most active current research group studying it. ( see pages under http://www.kurasc.kyoto-u.ac.jp/plasma-group/sps/milax-e.html ) 
Savuporo 11:49, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Looks like the text of the purported copyright violation has been in this article since Jan 10 2004 (and uncharacteristically stable since then!).  Since this report says it's published July 2008, I suggest it's an uncredited quotation of Wikipedia, not a copyright violation here. --Wtshymanski (talk) 15:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur and note that no archives exist to support an earlier publication of that summary. Lacking an earlier source that than tagged, here, evidence suggests the infringement is reversed. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio false alarm
Talk:Supper club

message: * Were/are these clubs exclusive, membership-based establishments, like British Gentlemen's clubs? glasperlenspiel 04:33, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Many supper clubs in the Midwest did have membership, but they were open to the public. The memberships provided a "subscription" of so many meals per year. Subscriptions were sold prior to the opening of the club, as a funding mechanism to have the place built/opened, and ensure there was sufficient demand in the mostly semi-rural locations.Gaijin42 (talk) 14:53, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Membership 

message: This article is ridiculously biased. Makes supper clubs sound like a uniquely midwestern thing. There are supper clubs all over the world. In Montreal for example Supper clubs tend to be trendy restaurants that offer some sort of entertainment during dinner and then turn into a trendy night club after dinner. The food served is usually haute-cuisine, not po-dunky American food like this article is saying...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.71.231.180 (talk) 18:58, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if this is a problem, but it probably isn't an NPOV issue. I'll replace  with . Note also that I've changed the section heading (from "Really biased") here on the talk page so the template will link to this section. PhageRules1 (talk) 23:57, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ha ha nice to see unbiased language like 'po-dunky American'--nice going!71.63.15.156 (talk) 02:07, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Globalize

message: It is like 3 articles mashed together with multiple Notes sections and external links sections. More work than I can handle. Green Cardamom (talk) 16:01, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup
Talk:Brockhaus Enzyklopädie

message: Per . This ain't it.
More specifically, per Ngram, the English and German forms of the name are roughly equally used and both are less common than referring to it as "Brockhaus" (i.e., Brockhaus (encyclopedia)). Since this page forms the natural disambiguation that uses English, this is where the page should go. — LlywelynII 12:47, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Ngram doesn't enter into it. It's a proper name, with no ambiguity about it - you see it right on the picture. "Brockhaus encyclopedia" (lowercase, and certainly without italics) is a possible descriptive term, but not one to use as a title. Unless a book has an actual translation, you can't just translate the title yourself and use it as if it were the proper name. Mewulwe (talk) 12:53, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:HMS Resolution

message: In the :Image:Witmont, Battle of the Gabbard.jpg depicts the encounter between Dutch ship Brederode and a Resolution as early as in 1653, while the first Resolution listed in the page dates back to 1667. Any suggestion?--Panairjdde 14:25, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The ship depicted is the brand-new Tredagh of 66 cannon; this ship was renamed Resolution in 1660 and was destroyed by a Dutch fireship from Tromp's squadron in the St James's Day Battle in 1666. The renaming is of course the cause of the confusion :o).
--MWAK 09:28, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

text: O, dear, I made a mistake; though the Tredagh was indeed renamed, the ship pictured was the Prince Royal, renamed Resolution during Commonwealth times, for obvious reasons.--MWAK 14:39, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  1653 Resolution 

message: * Sir Thomas Button sailed a ship named Resolution in search of the Northwest Passage in 1612 along with the Discovery (1602 ship). The "Discovery" was a ship of the British East India Company as perhaps the Resolution was as well. Button was naval peronnel when he made the voyage in 1612-13 and the Resolution was lost to the ice in Hudson Bay. Stormbay 18:57, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While wintering at Port Nelson, Manitoba many men died of scurvy, therefore the Resolution was abandoned and the voyage continued in the Discovery. The Port Nelson and the Nelson River were named after the master of the Resolution who died and was buried there. (Arthur S. Morton, A History of the Canadian West',page 30,no date, perhaps 1960) Benjamin Trovato (talk) 01:07, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sir [[Thomas Button]] and a ship named ''Resolution'' 

message: I believe the reference to the 12th Resolution on this article is actually the HMNZS Resolution (A-14). --JAYMEDINC 03:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 12th [[Resolution]]

message: Cook's ship is listed as 1771 but the 1770 ship is listed until 1782.  Overlap of the same ship or two with the same name?
--MartinezMD (talk) 04:53, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  1770 vs 1771
Talk:Bartenieff Fundamentals

message: The current version of this article is missing various fundamentals, such as what it is.  A layman attempting to infer what this is about could conclude it has something vaguely to do with either physiopherapy or dance.  Joe D (t) 14:29, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

message: The descriptions of the Fundamentals are using quotations from Hackney and Bartenieff but almost completely lack context. Additionally, it is so heavily based on quotations there is also no original material present. This risks copyright infringement, as anyone familiar with  or  will see immediately.
SebastianBechinger (talk) 17:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments on Descriptions 

message: Having done a little bit of homework - this article has been until know an almost complete copy and paste job from an article by Jeffery Longstaff for a PhD project - the link can be found here http://www.laban-analyses.org/jeffrey/2004-Bartenieff-fundamentals-Developmental-movement/summary-of-concepts.htm
Whilst Longstaff's interpretations are interesting, he is not an authority on the Bartenieff fundamentals and for encyclopaedic purposes more authoritative sources should be used and original material created.
I just wrote descriptions of the Basic Six based on my own practice of them, as introduced to me by a Certified Movement Analyst (ie graduate of Bartenieff's certification programme), and checked them against Irmgaard Bartenieff's own descriptions in Body Movement: Coping with the Environment (1980, p.231-239).
SebastianBechinger (talk) 20:11, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write needed
Talk:Wild strawberries

message: Can someone verify if it is indeed a Yoguslavian rock band. Mindmatrix 14:36, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Fact Checking

message: Any info on this --85.180.79.30 (talk) 19:49, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wild strawberry movement (Taiwan)
Talk:Portal vein

message: Does anyone have the power to move this page to hepatic portal vein?  The hepatic is official, and is used to distinguish it from the concept of a portal vein in general.
Mauvila 16:32, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hepatic portal vein - moving page?

message: I realised that the portal venous system information does not match for the "Hepatic Portal Vein" page and the "hypopgysea portal system". One said that there is only 2 while the other stated 3. So which is the accurate one?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lissa tan (talk • contribs) 10:55, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information does not match 

message: How about say what it does? e.g. portal vein can carry glucose and amino acids, but fats can only be carried via the lymph? 129.180.166.53 (talk) 03:42, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Function of the portal vein 

message: Summary states
> It is a major component of the hepatic portal system, one of three portal venous systems in the human body; the others being the hypophyseal and renal portal systems.
But the first sentence in the linked "Renal portal system" article states
> A renal portal system is a portal venous system found in reptiles, and fish excluding hagfish and lampreys. It is not found in mammals.
Is there a renal portal system in the human body or not? 134.100.13.82 (talk) 09:59, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renal portal system contradiction
Talk:J.C.Staff

message: Guys the most famous anime of the last ten years, and the great and most famous masterpiece of JCStaff, is of course Hi-Score Girl. It really needs to be added to the list!
2600:1700:7B9D:1110:7552:AF6E:F212:2A01 (talk) 13:44, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

message: For some reason under the original video animations section the start date for Tantei Opera Milky Holmes Alternative displays as "Error: Total length of format strings for #time exceeds 6000 bytes." I can't spot anything wrong with the actual source and it shows up correctly when previewing from the editor.173.67.31.163 (talk) 03:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Since they didn't begin producing televised anime until 1994, shouldn't we list the OVA section first so people are immediately presented with their first works? Ranze (talk) 14:37, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Section order

message: Most people very much enjoyed Toradora so if you could just maybe 
bring out more episodes or seasons. pls👍 64.178.184.99 (talk) 05:13, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toradora 

message: hey I know that this anime is very good and would you think that a lot of people will want to see a season 2 because everyone wants to see tiaga”s relationship and how it is going and we all want to see the couple they became so may you please bring seson  2 :) 2600:1702:1DD1:2720:A9F3:E42B:B4AC:13B1 (talk) 04:55, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toradora 

message: Should make a New Food War Anime but make it the same but different characters. 2601:205:4101:28B0:8CDB:8468:B020:79EB (talk) 08:36, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey
Talk:Tim Sebastian

message: No mention is made of the fact that Tim Sebastian is Jewish - and that his interviewing technique of Israeli interviewees is remarkably different to that meted out to Palestinians (NB Saeb Erekat) - related to Jeremy Paxman, by any chance...?? And, yes, it`s a very fair comment to make.--201.231.122.212 07:19, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Interviewing technique

message: It is strange that there's nowhere to be found the history how Tim Sebastian left BBC. As a (anecdotal) witness, I remember that BBC said that Tim turned out to be an agent of I don't know MI5, MI6, so he had to leave. Now it seems like this information has just disappeared. But some must still remember, no?
Vlad Patryshev (talk) 13:52, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spy Career 

message: In a radio program here in Germany I heard a speaker saying that Tim Sebastian has not only a British citizenship but also an Israeli citizenship, is that true?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:F5:CBC1:487B:B0B1:5327:583D:87B9 (talk) 04:40, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dual citizenship?
Talk:Municipalities of Baja California

message: A user appended ", Baja California" and changed the name for Playas de Rosarito. Official names are at http://www.microrregiones.gob.mx/catloc/Default.aspx?tipo=clave&campo=mun&valor=02
Reverted:
* https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mexicali_Municipality&diff=564998508&oldid=540602708 by TBrandley 2013
* https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ensenada_Municipality&diff=601597172&oldid=571030425 by Good Olfactory 2014
* https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tijuana_Municipality&diff=prev&oldid=670862012 by Eldizzino 2015
* https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tecate_Municipality&diff=prev&oldid=670861715 by Eldizzino 2015
Eldizzino (talk) 18:17, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Page moves by gone user
Talk:Green (disambiguation)

message: Ref:  --Sigmundur (talk) 03:41, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I added it. Thanks for bringing this up. Dawnseeker2000  03:52, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  GREEN, a programming language 

message: Please do not delete the Green Comet entry. I spend lots of time to edit minor entries from media which I enjoy, and I believe they deserve to be there. Please do not make my time go wasted. Thanks! 
MadisonGrundtvig (talk) 14:36, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but it doesn't satisfy the requirements. See WP:Partial title match. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:45, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Green Comet

message: Should he be added to this page under his stage name?
129.55.200.20 (talk) 15:52, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  GREEN, CeeLo
Talk:Dutch ship Eendracht (1655)

message: Eendracht is a popular name for Dutch ships; other notable ships of this name include:
*A ship of the Dutch East India Company that explored the Pacific in 1615–1616 
*The second Dutch ship to reach Australia, in 1615 .
So we need a disambiguation page. Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ships) suggests disambiguation by launch date, but I don't know the launch dates for any of these ships! Any clues or other ideas? Gdr 15:04, 2005 May 11 (UTC)
:Yes, it's a very popular name - as is fitting for a confederation ;o). I wouldn't know about the VOC-ships, but sailing warships, as you probably know, include:
*A frigate built for the admiralty of the Maas, launched 1624, 22 cannon.
*A ship built for the admiralty of the Northern Quarter, launched 1639, 48 cannon, burnt 1676.
*A galley ship bought for Rotterdam in 1647.
*A frigate built for the admiralty of Zealand, launched 1652, burnt 1653.
*Ditto, launched 1665, captured the same year.
*A ship built for the admiralty of the Maas, launched 1666, 76 cannon, wrecked in 1690, often serving as squadron flagship, carried home the body of De Ruyter in 1676.
*A frigate built for the admiralty of Amsterdam, launched 1675, 36 cannon, burnt the next year.
*A replacement of the former, launched 1676, 26 cannon, lost 1696.
*A first charter built for the admiralty of the Maas, launched 1703, 100 cannon, lost 1712, one of the largest ships of the line of the Dutch navy ever.
*A ship built for Amsterdam, launched 1747, 64 cannon, lost 1779.
*A frigate built for the admiralty of Frisia, launched 1770, 24 cannon, wrecked 1782.
:Afterwards the name has become impopular, only used for smaller ships, together with the concept itself: people no longer desired concord between autonomous provinces but a truly unitary state! Conversely your alternative translation of "Unity", often given in English books but imprecise, though meaning almost the same in modern western culture, would be anathema to a 17th century Dutchman who was fiercely proud of his provincial independence. No "Eenheid" for him!
:I fear it might well be difficult to find the launch dates of the Company ships. Records of the 16th century are patchy, and often Habsburg prizes were used as these tended to be bigger ships, better suited for the long journey to the Indies. But then we could include navy ships only.
--MWAK 17:42, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: A very different ship indeed. :o) --MWAK 17:38, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled