Talk:Might Is Right

message: Point of view (This artical seems to only be dominated by Darwinistic Randroids). Can their be at least SOME critical reviews as well? -- 69.248.43.27 21:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Since the text of the Might is Right is in public domain for long time, does anybody know where one may download the full original text? Perhaps somebody can OCR the book without the copyrighted introduction and afterword? I would definitely appreciate this. Memediver 10:06, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Download Might is Right 

message: Although LaVey used this in his work, I don't think this should necessarily be listed within the Satanism template. You could just as well put it under a Nazism template, an Evolutionary Theory template, or any other. It has contributed to much more than just Satanism, misinterpreted and reinterpreted to fit the aims of many groups. Fourthgeek 06:21, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Satanism

message: Ragnar Redbeard has no notability or verifiability outside of the book Might is Right, so that article should be merged with this one. — coelacan — 21:38, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As this has already been taken care of I'm going to archive this conversation for purposes of organization.  --129.71.73.247 (talk) 05:42, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge [[Ragnar Redbeard]] with this article 

message: *There is no clear-cut explanation on the page about the relation of the book with Satanism. This needs to be rectified.
*There are no examples of why it was considered "incendiary".
*There are no examples of its "glaring contradictions".
*Ragnar Redbeard should be merged into this, because it is lacking in content. Whatever little it does have, is subjective and unreferenced.
In view of these points, I'll go ahead with the merge and cleanup of these two pages in 48 hours if there are no objections. Thanks xC | ☎  04:02, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Initial merge has been completed. Will complete the cleanup and re-write (where neccessary) asap. xC | ☎  17:37, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content 

message: Editors regularly clean out undiscussed links from this article.  Please discuss here if you want a link not to be cleaned out regularly.  (You can help!)--VS talk 04:36, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discuss links here 

message: If you read the well-documented article on Arthur Desmond, it would appear that there is no question whatsoever about the book's authorship.170.71.252.34 (talk) 02:55, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authorship 

message: This book seems to get published by ideological publishers. I am wondering if any versions have taken liberty with the text in order to promote different agendas. And if not, which versions are recommended as authentic. --67.54.235.190 (talk) 01:18, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thinking about reading this, but... 

message: RAGNAR REDBEARD as a pen name, 
no matter who it is in actual reality,
means it is a satire automatically,
period.
This is a satire.
End of discussion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.24.251.152 (talk) 00:21, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  There needs to be a link to SATIRE in this article so that idiots who believe this not to be a work of satire understand what satire is 

message: A recent edit added the "broken link" tag to two external links (labeled "EGO No 6 1985 Twenty Five Pence", a link to the internet archive wayback machine capture of the original link and one label "the original"). The first link works for me, it takes a moment for the wayback site to load. I added the first link because the second one died, so I don't believe it has to be tagged as dead. AFAIK, I followed standard procedure for link to internet archive versions of dead links, if someone knows any better, speak up.--Sus scrofa (talk) 15:43, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken links tag 

message: Which section would be most appropriate to include information about this? Given that it's a recurring topic in criticism of TST and Greaves, people who search for information about it and find this article as a result could benefit from the inclusion of a short summary. Ezqel (talk) 17:42, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Satanic Temple and Lucien Greaves/Doug Misicko/Douglas Mesner's contribution to the Bugbee edition