lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Safflower

message: This section states the important fact that there are two kind of this oil with very different primary fatty acids, and notes that the high-oleic kind is currently the predominant one in the edible oil market. Following this is a table showing fatty acid composition without identifying which kind it is for, which is in fact it is for the non-predominent high-linoleic kind. This is very misleading. I've modified the title of this table with "high-linoleic" and added a table with the rough fatty acid composition of the high-oleic kind. It is not as detailed as the first table, coming from only one source and so not offering a min/max range, and only including the major fatty acid components, but it at least clears up what was previously grossly misleading. It could be improved later. --Ericjs (talk) 01:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Edible Oil
Talk:Brooklyn Commons

message: This article is horribly formatted and littered with POV-statements: "very easy to reach on the subway," "seems to be moving out". It would be great if it could be expanded to encycloaedic quality. Páll (Die pienk olifant) 08:56, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: MetroTech also contains offices and datacenters for NYC DoITT (Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications) and HRA (Human Resources Administration).
--74.76.100.144 (talk) 00:42, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing Data

message: "their operations in Downtown Brooklyn would be safe if Manhattan ever experienced a power failure (as seen in 1977)."
What is that supposed to mean? The blackout of 1977 was citywide. It affected all five boroughs, including Brooklyn. The only way MetroTech would be safe is if it wasn't served by ConEd and its suppliers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.12.50.159 (talk) 00:51, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Power grid
Talk:Canon A-1

message: I'd like to make the observation that contrary to the reports in this article MY A-1 has been very reliable in the 23 years that I've owned it using it primarily for (rock) concert photography in low-light, high vibration, high humidity environments. YMMV of course.  Megamanic 09:01, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: No subject

message: in fact the A1 was not the first to offer a fully automatic exposure mode, the first one was the minolta XD7 (named XD11 in the US), introduced a year earlier (77).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seneka (talk • contribs) 14:26, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: program mode
Talk:Bibliography of Irish rail transport

message: I intend to gradually work over and maybe update this list.  I will be using the format of  and related though sticking to alphabetical order.  Reasons: this make it simpler for anyone using this page to source Irish Rail transport on Wikipedia and also can be used to point to an open library copy when one is available to borrow.  Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:22, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Switching to cites
Talk:Fairchild Swearingen Metroliner

message: This article gives a cargo capacity of 4 cubic meters, which is implausible, even if the citation is truthful.  Other sources give about 4x that cargo capacity.  Suggest a fact (or math/unit) check and new reference for the cargo capacity. 67.169.166.36 (talk) 21:07, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed, not supported by Jane's 1982-83. Figure has been there since the early days of this article and possibly relates to the rear luggage compartment of an earlier variant. Jane's gives 490 cu ft for the fuselage 45 cu ft for the nose luggage compartment and 136 cu ft for the rear compartment. Volumes are rarely given in specs sections, more relevant is weight (of cargo). Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 09:51, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cargo capacity 

message: Please stop erasing FlyPelican out of the Fairchild Swearingen Metro because the plane has worked with and is currently in FlyPelican right now, so please stop erasing it. Xavierromelf (talk) 17:17, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you a reliable source according to FlyPelican they operate Jetstreams, and they would need to operate a large number to appear in the infobox. MilborneOne (talk) 17:20, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don’t put FlyPelican out of Fairchild Swearingen Metroliner
Talk:List of EDA companies

message: EDA companies come and go - at least in the past this happens very often. My proposal is to limit this page to existing or past EDA companies, but to not list companies which are not know to have a real EDA product but only interface with EDA systems. Also for every EDA company the name of their EDA products should be listed here. And finally this page should not be limited to the participants of a particular DAC conference. Comments? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lothartklein (talk • contribs) 2006-05-12 09:06:34
I am doing some disambuating, and found that the entry for EVE pointed to a nonexistant article about Emulation Verification Engineering and/or EVE. I changed the link to point to the web page for EVE, and verified on that web page that they are an exibitor at the 2006 DAC. Gerry Ashton 18:42, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: the major objection this page is linkfarm. On the other hand some of the redlinked companies may be notable, only there people have no time. So I am moving the whole old stuff here and removing all redlinked entries from the article . Mukadderat (talk) 23:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope you don't mind, but I have deleted the old version from here on the talk page. If anyone really needs it, they can go to the article's history and find it. It shouldn't be necessary to replicate it here. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 18:47, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old version 

message: (I moved the following here from my talk page. See my response at the bottom. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:42, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's good enough for me. I just reverted my edit, leaving the page as edited by Gert.goossens.  Thanks! --Guy Macon (talk) 19:42, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of Target Compiler Technologies in List_of_EDA_companies 

message: I have added Analog Rails and included a link to Analog Rails external website, because there is not yet a Wikipedia page for Analog Rails.  Once a separate Wikipedia page for Analog Rails is created, then that external link should be changed.  Analog Rails is a legitimate company that has exhibited at DAC several times, including 2012.
DevdogAZ (talk) 18:08, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. WP:WTAF. Articles must meet Wikipedia's WP:GNG guidelines.thanks--Hu12 (talk) 14:47, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of Analog Rails in List_of_EDA_companies 

message: After Intel bought Altera more than a year ago, there's a slow shift of terminology from Altera to Intel FPGA, which is why I am suggesting to replace "Altera" with "Intel (Altera)" for more precision, for future visitors of this wikipedia page. 
May-22-2017  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.108.128.135 (talk) 20:03, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replace "Altera" with "Intel FPGA"
Talk:Military budget of Japan

message: I came here hoping to find information on recent military spendings by Japan. Instead this article stops at 1990. I came here from military budget where it has Japan spending the second largest amount in absolute terms on its military.  If anyone has the information, it would be awesome if you could update this page for current statistics and maybe a nice little chart and comparisons with other nations (especially ones that legitamately field an military). marnues 09:16, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I imported some of the information from our List of countries by military expenditures to update this a little bit with regard to world rankings in 2004-5.  I didn't include anything on Japanese spending as a fraction of national budget or GDP though.  I gather from Military budget that Japan was actually second in the world in 2002, presumably because at that point high post-9/11 budgets hadn't been enacted by the European powers?   
Boris B 09:47, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Talk:My Girl (The Temptations song)

message: Would someone with more technical ability than I have please put the "My Girl" sound clip in a format that most people can easily use (RealPlayer or Windows Media). Thank you. Bob em 09:16, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved   Calidum 16:23, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested Move 

message: I noticed that User:George Ho has been using"free images" in place of the original images. I don't see why the same can't be done in this article.2601:153:801:1C70:4C4F:D555:E0D6:484A (talk) 20:31, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Found and then uploaded a free image to use. George Ho (talk) 22:31, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free image
Talk:Rishabha (Hinduism)

message: I think name should be spelt as Rishabha. Subramanya 09:17, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct Spelling

message: Srimad Bhagavatam doesn't say s**t about Jainism.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.69.155.66 (talk) 17:25, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Para

message: In the Bhagavata Purana (in particular canto) that is quoted, Krishna as the source of all avatars is described, as such Rishabha is also described as Krishna. But in list of avatars of Vishnu, Rishabha is also mentioned. These books explicitly mention rishabha as an avatar of Vishnu. .--Redtigerxyz  Talk  05:23, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Here are a few more reliable sources (including John Muir (indologist)) that support Rishabha as an incarnation of Vishnu. Priyanath talk 05:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rishabha: avatar of Vishnu 

message: Should those two articles be merged? Read them. They just seem to be two views (Hindu and Jain) of the same person, which would make them POV forks. Priyanath talk 05:56, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  This article can be built as a sub-article of Rishabha the tirthankar on the lines of Gautama Buddha in Hinduism. --Redtigerxyz  Talk  06:16, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree with Red, that this page can be justified as a stand alone page and include details that would be undue in the Jain article. That said this page does need to be renamed to correct the capitalization: any prefrence among Rishabha (Hinduism) and Rishabha (Hindu sage). I prefer the former since Rishabha was not only a sage (also a king, avatar etc), but don't mind either. Abecedare (talk) 05:32, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Rishabha (Hinduism) would be best, for the reasons you explain. Priyanath talk 05:36, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. Abecedare (talk) 05:42, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Rishabha (hindu sage)]] and [[Rishabha (Jain tirthankar)]] 

message: I removed some paragraphs from the articles which were not relaible and poorly sourced, contained original research. If you have any problem then kindly discuss the issue here.-- Harshil want to talk? 05:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  I removed unencyclopaedic and poor quality content from the page.
Talk:Futaba-kun Change!

message: Iroka Kahoru or Kahoru Iroka?
The (out-of-print) Ironcat issues say that the name of Futaba's "mother" is Kahoru Iroka. This article says different. Which is correct?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.83.214.167 (talk) 19:47, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 5 Brilliantly Perverted Manga, Jason Thompson ANN Jason Thompson --KrebMarkt 06:51, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s)
Talk:The Fordham Ram

message: Please provide a citation that justifies the use of the qualifier "premier".  If none, please remove the reference.Shoreranger 03:27, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation to justify "premier", please?

message: Please provide awards and, preferably, years given.  A temporal grounding concerning awards should give a good indicatio to the reader of the paper's standing.Shoreranger 03:31, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation for "myriad" of awards?
Talk:Kartli

message: I have a question: why is ქართლი translated into latin letters as Kartli, when it is actually Qartli? The same would apply to Qartuli - ქართული. Alsandro 09:36, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: (Just in case anyone sees this six-year-old question:)  There are several different transliteration systems in use when Georgian words are brought into English.  The Latin k is often used to represent კ, ქ, or even ყ — all of which are basically indistinguishable to native speakers of English.  It may not make perfect sense, but it's commonly done and is unlikely to change.  — Richwales 06:26, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Plantar fasciitis

message: Sex is biological and was the sense meant in the lead. Thus restored. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:16, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Sex versus gender

message: The ordering of content in the lead generally follows that of the body. Thus restored the discussion of the underlying mechanism to paragraph 2. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:49, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead

message: I guess the question is how does one say "Plantar fasciopathy is a clinical diagnosis" in easier to understand language?
User:TylerDurden8823  what do you think of "The presentation of the symptoms is generally the basis for diagnosis"
"The presence of appropriate signs and symptoms is essential for diagnosis" does not indicate that this is in fact how the diagnosis is made (ie it is generally based on a person's symptoms)  Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:10, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are set on this second one, sure I guess. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:13, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , I think it does indicate that that is how the diagnosis is made, actually. If you want to change it to say that the presence of appropriate signs and symptoms is required for diagnosis (instead of essential for diagnosis) for clarity, I think that would be fine. I think saying "is generally the basis for diagnosis" reads awkwardly when I say it out loud. Does that address the concern you have about how it's currently written? TylerDurden8823 (talk) 19:27, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Diagnosis

message: Shouldn't 'calcaneous' be 'calcaneus'?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.246.252.97 (talk) 06:04, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Diagram
Talk:Plantar fascia

message: AdamSEOWorks (talk) 12:14, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

message: Article needs a diagram to help.  DyslexicEditor 09:41, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Kosigrim provided images and anatomy & biomechanics details to plantar fasciitis which seemed more appropriately relocated to this article. David Ruben  Talk  16:03, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article
Talk:United States Army Air Corps

message: I'll start. I support a split. I am plodding my way through the older forerunners of the USAF and re-writing the U.S. Army Air Service article now. I will move to the USAAC next, and when finished, the element regarding the current organization will be more of a footnote.--Buckboard 09:51, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A split seems logical; as the original USAAC and the modern AAC are two different entities. Greenshed 16:41, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: USAAC also stands for US Army Accessions Command... 
Hal06 01:19, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanx, Ironmajor.  I think you'll be reassured to find that both the articles on the Air Corps and the AAF now reflect much of the information you've posted here. I appreciate the buttressing of that foundation you've added to the discussion here.--Reedmalloy (talk) 07:15, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: A user has proposed moving Army Air Corps to Army Air Corps (disambiguation), and moving Army Air Corps (United Kingdom) back to its original location, Army Air Corps. The main discussion is at Talk:Army Air Corps#Moving to disambiguation page. - BillCJ (talk) 04:26, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice of proposed moves

message: The insignia shown on this page (roundel with red center) is incorrect. The Red "dot" should "touch" the tangent lines of the star points, and the star "legs" should touch the exterior circle, as the pictures show. 
Source: "Air Force Colors", Volume 1 - 1926-1942, by Dana Bell, Squadron/Signal Publications (Paper book)
Lnewqban (talk) 17:39, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed correction for shown insignia

message: The assessment of this article was long overdue, an oversight, but still is rated as "start" class because the rater assessed it as "not referenced". Right. Only every paragraph sourced, using eight different major sources. Chuckles.--Reedmalloy (talk) 06:31, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Reassessed to reflect the referencing.--Reedmalloy (talk) 04:32, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: The listing of all Air Corps units on March 1, 1935 was carefully done over the years to represent an  orderly, readable, easily-linked snapshot of the Air Corps at a key moment in its history that was also typified the service until February 1940. IOW, something that could quickly and accurately inform the uninformed (but interested or curious) about the size, makeup, leadership, and structure of the arm. Now it is not. You meant well, but you were wrong. I once had the energy to fight this glut of arcane detailing muddying a general listing, but no longer. An encyclopedia can be a hobby, but it should not be a toy. End of rant.--Reedmalloy (talk) 16:03, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Perhaps you found it to be an "orderly, readable, easily-linked snapshot".   I thought it to be a jumble of information.    As all articles here are editable,   feel free to improve it.  Bwmoll3 (talk) 21:36, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Never mind.  I just did it.  Bwmoll3 (talk) 21:39, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: A general rant
Talk:The Fat Guy Strangler

message: Thanks for taking the time to review this article. Let it be known that understand the reception and cultural references sections are short, but I spent 30 minutes looking for reception and through season 5 DVD reviews to see if there was a mention, and I could only find one piece. As for the cultural references, there were very few listed on the DVD (but there were also very few unreferenced, bulleted ones before this.) I have made the articles as best as I can, and tried to make up for the small cultural references section by having a long production section, so, overall – I hope these factors will not hold the article back from becoming a GA. Thank you. Qst (talk) 16:17, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Further note: The Reception section has now been expanded, so that shoudl be okay now. Qst (talk) 16:39, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice to GA reviewer 

message: GA Review
Lead
*I don't consider myself a grammar wizard, but I believe that semicolons normally are meant to replace a conjunction, so in places where you have "; so", either "so" or the semicolon needs to be removed.
*Channel and country the show first appeared on are needed.
**. This is not common among The Simpsons and Family Guy or on most cartoon articles, it tends to be set out how it is now. Qst (talk) 12:08, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  All issues addressed. For those that have a  tag on, I have explained why this is. 12:17, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

text: All done. Qst (talk) 22:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Review 

message: The Price Is Right scene took "years" to make?  How is that possible? --Captain Infinity (talk) 22:53, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm guessing it means getting it right; I'm going by what MacFarlane said on the commentary. 23:33, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production section - Price Is Right 

message: Needs a rework from top to bottom. Lots42 (talk) 16:27, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current version 

message: I want it to be added that there was also a TV-show in the UK on ITV that was called Fat Club that later evolved into the more well-known Celebrity Fit Club but I don't think I have to proper wiki-skills to do it right. Could somebody fix? --93.182.148.81 (talk) 10:20, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other meaning of 'Fat Club'
Talk:Peter De Vries

message: I don't think that the mention of Pine Rest is appropriate for this entry.  It has absolutely nothing to do with Mr. De Vries and serves only as an "advertisement" for Pine Rest.  For that reason, I removed the reference.
-------  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ungennant (talk • contribs) 02:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Question: Is one of Frank Herbert's Dune character named after him?
    
I think that it's not a confirmed idea... I'm not entirely sure of the rules on this yet, but would that be added as trivia?  -LetterAfterZ 13:33, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless there is some verification in Herbert's writings that the name of the author inspired that of the character, I would call this a coincedence, not noteable, and unnecessary to mention here.  The character is Piter, not Peter, in any case. Caliban93 (talk) 00:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dune Character 

message: I've added a couple sentences about De Vries being a U.S. Marine Captain in WW 2 and serving with the OSS (predecessor of the CIA). Information about his time in the military is sketchy, but I had at least one good source so at least for now I put it into the article. Other dates/years from the Wiki and other sources might seem to contradict him being in the service, or if so not for very long, so I'm kind of stumped. Considering De Vries penchant for satire and humor I suppose it is a possibility that he made up the Marine / OSS stuff and fed it to the media as a joke. Any help on this greatly appreciated, whether it proves to be true or false, just so we know and are accurate. Thanks & have a great Wiki kind of day. Sector001 (talk) 03:44, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military service?  
Talk:Pontia callidice

message: Is the Lofty Bath White Pontia callidice or Synchloe callidice? Lepindex says thatSynchloe is the valid genus for Lofty Bath White.
Is kalora to be accepted as a valid taxon or as a subspecies of callidice? LepIndex says kalora is a valid taxon.
Hence the new scientific name for the Indian subspecies of Lofty Bath White, Pontia callidice kalora, is proposed as Indian Lofty Bath White Synchloe kalora.
See the following links :-
* Lepindex for genus Synchloe
:* http://internt.nhm.ac.uk/jdsml/perth/lepindex/detail.dsml?TaxonNo=180185.0&UserID=&UserName=&
* Lepindex for genus Pontia
:* http://internt.nhm.ac.uk/jdsml/perth/lepindex/detail.dsml?TaxonNo=180004.0&UserID=&UserName=&
* Lepindex for callidice
:* http://internt.nhm.ac.uk/jdsml/perth/lepindex/detail.dsml?UserID=&UserName=&TaxonNo=180188.0&SCIENTIFIC_NAME_on_card=callidice
* Lepindex for kalora
:* http://internt.nhm.ac.uk/jdsml/perth/lepindex/detail.dsml?UserID=&UserName=&TaxonNo=180197.0&SCIENTIFIC_NAME_on_card=kalora
I propose to change it to Synchloe kalora if consensus exists.AshLin 19:40, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxonomy problems