Talk:List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes/Archive 2

message: I've noticed that some of the SpongeBob episode articles have quotes in them. Why not put those quotes at the SpongeBob SquarePants articles at Wikiquote? Squirepants101 01:10, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikiquote

message: I've get info about a new episodes, but I don't sure if they real...
source:
1.
2.
Can you provide better sources than those, besides a forum and a German website because the forum does not give an exact link to prove whether this episode is real or not. The forum also claims that this episode aired in Germany. Squirepants101 23:40, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Driven To Tears / Rule Of The Dumb?

message: I found a source about SpongeBob (character), and it was copied from our article, SpongeBob SquarePants (character). In the "Other Trivia" part, it said "In the upcoming episode, A New Leaf, SpongeBob is a great DiskJockey. Maybe I should add A New Leaf to this article. Here's the source:
#] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iswatch19 (talk • contribs) 
That's obviously the same thing as New Leaf  and SpongeBob was a DJ in New Leaf. Squirepants101 00:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A New Leaf

message: I thought no one was supposed to recreate The Best Day Ever article (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Best Day Ever) until they recieve more info, but someone recreated it and linked it to TV.com (not a realible source of information because its episode guide had fake episodes months ago like Uncle Sherm's Visit). Then an adminstrator awarded the user who created it with a barnstar. What's going on?! Also, the article claims that The Best Day Ever song will be sung in this episode? Is that true (if it's true, provide me with some evidence, like a commercial)? Squirepants101 00:33, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Confused

message: I found info about season four episodes and the only upcoming ones are: "Bummer Vacation", "Wigstruck", "That's No Lady" and "The Best Day Ever".
Sources:
#
#
--MacintoshApple 11:39, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Season 4

message: If you check out German Nickelodeon's website, you can see new episodes that haven't aired in the United States yet (in German), including one involving Patrick driving a boat (Eine Träine im Schlagloch), Patricia, and Königlicher Quatsch (using Google translator, this episode translates into Royal Rubbish and if you watch the episode in German, you can probably tell it involves Patrick discovering that he is royality). Squirepants101 14:39, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Episodes in Germany 

message: Can you tell me how to watch them? They won't load for some reason.--Patrickrox11 15:09, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help me with these episodes! 

message: I am going to add these new episodes:Burn to Be Wild/Best Frenemies. They are definetly real because they are on the German website .If you have any comments or questions, send me a message. --Patrickrox11 15:44, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is another new episode announced for 12th December 2006 on the German website of NICK : "The Pink Purloiner"/"Squid Wood". -- Wrzlbrnft 15:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burn to Be Wild/Best Frenemies 

message: You know i realized that you have almost all the title cards for the SpongeBob SquarePants episodes and i was thinking that maybe i could put them on the list. I already finished doing that for season 1. I think it's a good idea. OK that's it. So a are you going to leave now? OK bye. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zany zacky (talk • contribs) 
Um... If you didn't notice, you put some of the title cards in the airdate section. --MacintoshApple 22:34, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title Cards 

message: There should not be parenthesis around the years on the episode lists. Other series have the season followed by : and then the year. It should look like this Season 1: 1999-2000 not like this Season 1 (1999-2000).
24.47.198.164 22:07, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't matter --Caldorwards4 22:22, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Prenthesis around the years

message: Is Mermaid Man and Barnacle Boy VII a real episode? If it is, can anyone please tell me where you got it from?--Patrickrox11 23:32, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mermaid Man and Barnacle Boy VII 

message: Since we have added Mermaid Man and Barnacle Boy VII, I think it would be nessecary to add DJ Patrick(definetly real), Uncle Sherm's Visit(probably real), and Obsession(maybe real). Obsession is probably real because I read that All That Glitters was supposed to be Obsession and they needed it for a new episode. So, don't delete these episodes when you see them.--Patrickrox11 01:29, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obsession,Uncle Sherm's Visit,DJ Patrick 

message: Ok, It seems that The Best Day Ever is 15 minutes long so there will be another new 15 episode that will air along side it once it airs. 
Can I add the other episode slot since The Best Day Ever is really half of an episode?
Yeah, I think we should. I heard that there may be a second part to it called "Gift of Gum." I agree and I think it would good to.--Patrickrox11 18:51, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Best Day Ever

message: Born to be wild and best frenemies are real episodes. check out the german website, they have the whole episode (in german) on the site. :| 74.130.7.136 21:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  real episodes 

message: I see a lot more episodes on TVwiki than here... Kitia 22:14, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  TVwiki? 

message: I have changed the episode list a bit because Wigstruck airs with Bummer Vacation and Squidtastic Voyage airs with That's No Lady. 
I'd like to tell you that Bummer Vacation airs first and Wigstruck airs second. Zany zacky 16:30, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode List 

message: *What is going on here? Who violated it? -AMK152 21:36, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that some of the episodes summaries (especially the season four episodes at the bottom of the episode list) were copied from TV.com's season four episode list, although there could be the possibility that some of these summaries could have been submitted here first, then submitted to TV.com. Squirepants101 21:52, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Can't we just change them? The entire article isn't copyvio. -AMK152 02:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *I remember submitting some of the summaries here on Wikipedia to TV.com, so it might be all my fault. --SpongeSebastian 02:23, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 

message: Talk:List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes/Temp - I removed all copyvios. When can we be allow to bring this over to the actual page? -AMK152 02:27, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  Chick Bowen 03:08, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tempory Page

message: I reformatted season one to help trim this article's size down and it worked. It does not say the article is too long anymore. Even though this article's size is less, the other seasons would need reformatting to prevent this article from becoming too large. Squirepants101 23:07, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reformatted part of the article 

message: I've noticed that some users are changing Born to be Wild to Burn to be Wild. It's actually Born to be Wild according to the credits. To see the credits, go to this link and watch Best Frenemies. When you hit 10:32 (in minutes) on Windows Media Player, the credits show the cast for each episode and in big capital letters, it reads, "Born to be Wild." Squirepants101 01:42, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are users changing Born to be Wild to Burn to be Wild? 

message: I am going to search for unfinished episodes of Spongebob. Then, I suggest that we should make an unfinished episode section on the episode page.--Patrickrox11 15:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unfinished Episodes 

message: wasn't the article fine with the title cards in season 2,3, and 4? I don't  get what was so wrong.--Chikinpotato11 05:58, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I think it was because the page was getting to big. --Reeler 04:24, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  deleting the other images 

message: Should this page be protected because some users have disagreed with this "new" format for season 1 and keep trying to change it back to the way it was. This article is also becoming a breeding ground for vandalism (look at all the fake episodes users have been adding recently) even with the warning posted on season 4. Squirepants101 13:27, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected? 

message: Does anyone else find it interesting that we are missing articles on great literary classics, yet we have an archive of spongebob squarepants epsiodes with a seperate synopsis for each one? Unnessicary, much? --ABigBlackMan 14:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't really see what's the problem here since you can actually create some of these articles about literary classics. Besides, other T.V. show articles have their own episode list article and even articles about the episodes themselves. There are are even Wikiprojects exclusive to episode list articles, and episode articles. Squirepants101 22:18, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What are those literary clasics? I know that the article on Little Women is just over a stub, but is there nonetheless. Kitia 23:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Would suggest the episode articles are merged into a single article for each season. Addhoc 13:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wow.

message: re: the 2nd sentence in the 1st paragraph of this article:
"there have been a total of 77½ episodes (158 individual) to date..."
would it be better to say:
"there have been a total of 77½ shows (158 individual episodes) to date..."
Atomicpuffball 16:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Head Wording

message: There are no confirmed 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, or 13 seasons. Also, some of these episodes I can tell are fake, especially the ones that are just sequels to previous episodes.
*Actually, a season 6 has been confirmed.--SpongeSebastian 07:29, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fake Seasons 

message: Do you see this? right here! It's on the history page (article not talk)
*(cur) (last)  12:30, 22 November 2006 70.251.32.128 (Talk) (→Season 4 (2005-2006)) 
*(cur) (last)  06:58, 22 November 2006 Caldorwards4 (Talk | contribs) (removing useless page cruft info) 
*(cur) (last)  03:49, 22 November 2006 4.239.42.224 (Talk) (→Season 4 (2005-2006)) 
*(cur) (last)  02:59, 22 November 2006 Chick Bowen (Talk | contribs) m (moved Talk:List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes/Temp to List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes: replacing copyvio with non-copyvio temp page) 
*(cur) (last)  02:24, 22 November 2006 AMK152 (Talk | contribs) (update/removed copyvios) 
*(cur) (last)  23:00, 21 November 2006 206.54.194.56 (Talk) (MADE LIST OF SPONGEBOB EPISODES) 
What's going on here? It is january 1st then it skips to November 21. Why is this?
*(cur) (last)  10:08, 1 January 2006 Woohookitty (Talk | contribs) 
*(cur) (last)  01:40, 1 January 2006 AMK152 (Talk | contribs) 
*(cur) (last)  23:37, 31 December 2005 Dmcdevit (Talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by 68.100.191.132 (talk) to last version by Apostrophe) 
*(cur) (last)  23:24, 31 December 2005 68.100.191.132 (Talk) 
*(cur) (last)  19:48, 31 December 2005 Apostrophe (Talk | contribs) (rvv) 
*(cur) (last)  19:47, 31 December 2005 68.248.90.160 (Talk) (→Season 12 (2013–2014)) 
*(cur) (last)  19:26, 31 December 2005 68.248.90.160 (Talk) 
*(cur) (last)  19:06, 31 December 2005 Apostrophe (Talk | contribs) (rvv) 
--Chikinpotato11 19:55, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *There were copyvios and an Admin removed all history between January 1st and November 21st. I don't understand what the copyvio even was. --AMK152 (Talk • Contributions Leave message) 20:07, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  wikipedia is corrupt 

message: On President's Day, they are airing a Patrick marathon +3 new episodes from 7-8:30.
Source: http://www.cabletvtalk.com/showthread.php?t=4138 
I'll post the air dates because these are probably them:
Driven to Tears/Rule of Dumb
Born to Be Wild/Best Frrenemies
The Pink Purloiner/Squid Wood
--Patrickrox11 16:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New SpongeBob Episodes Airing in the US! 

message: According to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television), an episode page that is the same name of another article, should have ONLY the show's title name in parenthesis. The only time the addition "episode" is added is when the episode title is the same name of a character or object in the show. --SpongeSebastian 02:55, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  (SpongeBob SquarePants episode) Vs (SpongeBob SquarePants) 

message: Just to let the editors of this page know, all those users are sockpuppets. See User:WzMG5LJ for more information about this. He claims that he is from Guatemala and claims that he's trying to "help" Wikipedia by adding possible episodes to this page (and quite a few other articles). Note: He knows that these episodes he's adding are fake, so the warnings might not work against him. Squirepants101 01:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Betos00, CRWXTr7, CRWXT, and WzMG5LJ are all sockpuppets 

message: It says in the article that some of the episodes from the presidents' day thing are part of Season 5.  I haven't heard that announced or anything.  It seems like vandalism to me, but I didn't delete them because I'm not completely sure.
Yeah. Those episodes are from Season 5. They aren't on the Season 4 DVD's, so they must be from Season 5. --Patrickrox11 00:21, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Season 5 already started?

message: It seems to me that much is made of the caption errors in the Spongebob episode Trivia sections.
In my opinion, caption errors are too trivial even for the trivia section -- most TV shows have them, yet you don't see them mentioned on other TV show Wikipedia articles.
I vote for getting rid of all of 'em -- what say ye? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kwantem (talk • contribs) 21:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's trim the captions errors please... 

message: I've been noticing that a few of the one or two sentence descriptions for the episodes on this list that I've been making a bit more easy to understand have been either reverted back to what was there before or replaced with descriptions that are more vague. I was just wondering why that was happening.
:--Tiria 12:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Descriptions 

message: === Get rid of all the images/screenshots in this article ===
They are taking up much of the article's space. According to Wikipedia's fair use policy, the ammount of copyrighted work should be used as little as possible and that images should contribute significantly to the article. It seems that these images are being used solely for a decorative purpose (squint your eyes and you can see that this article is just an image gallery with words in it). As one editor put it, this article is a giant fair-use disaster. Squirepants101 16:24, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also if these images were removed, the page may load better. Squirepants101 16:26, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll try to remove them sometime. I might replace them with screenshots of the actual episode.--SpongeSebastian 03:44, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Actually, I think the title cards made the page look better. -AMK152(Talk • Contributions • Send message)  03:52, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

text: That was User:FictionH who did that. He did it after someone else suggested it. There wasn't a clear consensus, since not many users commented on it, but he made the change anyways. I'm going to open a consensus right now. Squirepants101 00:37, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Note that by screenshots, we are referring to the ones found in the episodes. Squirepants101 19:23, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I think that we should get rid of the title cards (since there's really no point in them) and replace them with regular screenshots like what other episode lists do. Examples: 1 2 3 --SpongeSebastian 22:50, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I believe the title cards should be used only. someone remvoed these, and there wasn't even a consensus. -AMK152(Talk • Contributions • Send message)  20:03, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

text: And what do you have against screenshots? --SpongeSebastian 22:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

text: SpongeSebastian, we are trying to get rid of the screenshots. They require a lot of maintenance, take up too much space, and completely overrule the copyright law. We should have 1 picture to describe the episode, which is the title card. No more screenshots should be added at all, so don't ask for them. Setherex 04:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, then can't we just remove the title cards and replace them with screenshots? A lot of episode lists use screenshots instead of title cards. --SpongeSebastian 01:57, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Title cards are television screenshots, but if we didn't take the title cards off, some users may consider the article an even larger fair use disaster (most of the images here don't have fair use rationales). Squirepants101 12:19, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Squire, the title cards aren't very useful, that's why we should get rid of them. --SpongeSebastian 03:10, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Where did all the images go? - Super48 20:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They were removed due to Wikipedia rules against non-free images --Caldorwards4 22:30, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Why are there no longer articles about the episodes —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.79.176.115 (talk) 19:36, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Screenshots

message: They are taking up much of the article's space. According to Wikipedia's fair use policy, the ammount of copyrighted work should be used as little as possible and that images should contribute significantly to the article. It seems that these images are being used solely for a decorative purpose (squint your eyes and you can see that this article is just an image gallery with words in it). As one editor put it, this article is a giant fair-use disaster. Squirepants101 16:24, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also if these images were removed, the page may load better. Squirepants101 16:26, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll try to remove them sometime. I might replace them with screenshots of the actual episode.--SpongeSebastian 03:44, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Actually, I think the title cards made the page look better. -AMK152(Talk • Contributions • Send message)  03:52, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Get rid of all the images/screenshots in this article 

message: If you ask me, this page should contain both Title cards AND screenshots. (Superjustinbros. 23:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images AND Title Cards

message: Who messed up the screenshots? I would appreciate that only the titles and not some other screenshot from the epidsode appear in the "SCREENSHOT" selection. Thank you. Heyfunboy 00:33, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That was User:FictionH who did that. He did it after someone else suggested it. There wasn't a clear consensus, since not many users commented on it, but he made the change anyways. I'm going to open a consensus right now. Squirepants101 00:37, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenshots 

message: I am requesting a consensus about whether to include both title cards and screenshots or not. There seems to be a dispute about this, as seen in the history of the page. Remember that Wikipedia is not a democracy and that this is not a vote. Explain your reasoning, please. Squirepants101 02:06, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that by screenshots, we are referring to the ones found in the episodes. Squirepants101 19:23, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I think that we should get rid of the title cards (since there's really no point in them) and replace them with regular screenshots like what other episode lists do. Examples: 1 2 3 --SpongeSebastian 22:50, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I believe the title cards should be used only. someone remvoed these, and there wasn't even a consensus. -AMK152(Talk • Contributions • Send message)  20:03, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consensus regarding screenshots 

message: I will let people add episodes only if you promise to stop adding the screenshots. {Superjustinbros. 18:22, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And what do you have against screenshots? --SpongeSebastian 22:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gold and Sliver locks

message: Can someone who has a DVD player on their computer or a video capture card please upload screenshots for every episode? Thanks. --SpongeSebastian 22:37, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: SpongeSebastian, we are trying to get rid of the screenshots. They require a lot of maintenance, take up too much space, and completely overrule the copyright law. We should have 1 picture to describe the episode, which is the title card. No more screenshots should be added at all, so don't ask for them. Setherex 04:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, then can't we just remove the title cards and replace them with screenshots? A lot of episode lists use screenshots instead of title cards. --SpongeSebastian 01:57, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Title cards are television screenshots, but if we didn't take the title cards off, some users may consider the article an even larger fair use disaster (most of the images here don't have fair use rationales). Squirepants101 12:19, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Squire, the title cards aren't very useful, that's why we should get rid of them. --SpongeSebastian 03:10, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Where did all the images go? - Super48 20:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They were removed due to Wikipedia rules against non-free images --Caldorwards4 22:30, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Why are there no longer articles about the episodes —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.79.176.115 (talk) 19:36, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  We need more screenshots!