Template talk:ITV

message: I am just wondering why the broadcasting regulators are part of the template, it does give the impression that they are part of ITV to those readers who may not know about ITV and the broadcasting regulators. To avoid confusion, would it be better to remove the regulators? (or at least create a separate template for the regulators?) --tgheretford (talk) 21:02, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regulators 

message: I widened the template by 25 pixels, as the previous width (595) was causing at least two of the lines to wrap a single word onto the following lines (which is why arbitrary use of line-breaks in templates should probably be avoided).  Pixel-based widths are also probably a bad idea, as in general they do not degrade gracefully  (when faced with a viewport that isn't wide enough, Bad Things™ can happen), but that's a problem for another day. 81.104.170.167 19:21, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Width 

message: This looks clunky and incorrect. ITV London is also a "non-franchise" region if you wish to include them - or otherwise leave them as "ITV Regions". Marbles333 15:04, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is correct - Thames Valley isn't a franchise. And I think we'll so the same for STV... NotMuchToSay 20:02, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Non-franchise" 

message: The sections at the bottom are pontless, containing 1 link each. Why not merge them into an "other"? Anthrcer (click to talk to me) 12:52, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generalization 

message: How about this? Splitting this temp into three temps: ITV, ITV plc and ITV Franchises (Historical).
Because, for example, Friends Reunited is owned bt ITV plc, Not the ITV Network. Also, the file size.
Template ITV plc is a place for the PLC-owned-franchises, ITV digital channels and websites while ITV Franchises (Historical) contains the links to the historical franchise holders.
--JSH-alive (talk)(cntrbtns)(mail me) 08:57, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: I decided to be bold, and add this to the template. If anyone has a problem, then feel free to reply and revert. Thanks, Malpass93 (talk) 12:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsuccessful Franchise Bids 

message: First off I strongly disagree that making it yellow is lurid and unnecessary, as its one of ITV corporate colours If you not happy about: 
* Cerulean blue 	#2A52BE
Nearly All the templates on wiki are look the same, why cant some not have the colour of company its linked to? Crazyseiko (talk)
: Templates are generally in the standard blue to maintain a consistent look and feel across the project and to match with the rest of the article colour scheme. The most notable exceptions are universities and sports teams. In my view it is most appropriate for this template to stay in the standard colours. This template is not in any case for just the current ITV1 or even ITV plc, but for the whole of the ITV network, past and present, for which the bright yellow is not necessarily relevant (e.g. the current ITV3 logo colour is red, the ITV1 (as was) logo colour used to be blue).Rangoon11 (talk) 19:02, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Having Yellow colour for the template

message: You should add the Templates of STV and of UTV, they're all the same agency anyway, they're all part of the same ITV Network.
95.236.181.137 (talk) 13:18, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Template:STV gives Airport information at the Search (for) Travel website, and there is no :Template:UTV although it redirects to :Template:Wireless GroupDirect links to STV and UTV  are already in the top line of this template - Arjayay (talk) 13:36, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 March 2016