lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1977 UEFA Cup final

message: Hello! Is it possible to add a file with the starting lineups for both the finals.
--88.91.100.244 (talk) 14:56, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starting lineups
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-01-28/Dispatches

message: A banner year, but it pales in comparison with the ambitions of WP:100K.--75.37.14.57 (talk) 17:47, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:100K should have focused on B-class or Good Articles. That number of featured articles was never realistic. Carcharoth (talk) 23:08, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Nice report, Marskell. The first four paragraphs could maybe be made more interesting with some links? You could link "Featured article process" for example, and you could link to full lists of FAs for 2005 and 2006 if they exist. You could also link "removals process", "featured topics", and you could link to the featured topics for "hurricane related coverage" (I actually make it four separate topics listed) and "Solar System coverage". Finally, you use the abbreviations FA and FAC - it would be worth spelling those out in full the first time you use them, and then sticking the abbreviation in brackets after that first use. Even with that, I regretfully have to Oppose Featured Signpost article status... :-) Carcharoth (talk) 23:08, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Very droll :-) --kingboyk (talk) 01:02, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Thanks. Yes, I had meant to dab it all. Looks like Ral got to it. Marskell (talk) 10:49, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Guerrilla phase of the Second Chechen War

message: Feargod, I beleive you have had this discussion before with Hanzo. These are sensitive and controversial issues. If you want to change the name of this article, start a discussion. Don't just go ahead and hope no-one will notice.ForrestSjap (talk) 19:28, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I beleive the discussion ended with this decision. Anyway: here are other examples on wiki: Iraqi insurgency, Islamic insurgency in Saudi Arabia, Taliban insurgency... that's the common name used by wikipedia and most sources. Also, I feel very offended by your statement that I hope no-one will notice my edits. I'm not that type of person. Have you heard for WP:BOLD?? --TheFEARgod (Ч) 20:50, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "decide a title for yourself": In case you didn't see this, it wasn't my idea. Also, you agreed on the similar name I renamed it to. I'm now renaming to the exact name you proposed with.  --TheFEARgod (Ч) 23:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

text: "You're "very offended"? You're kidding me". Kidding you?? Maybe you are mr. Forrest Sjap... --TheFEARgod (Ч) 23:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Insurgency points at combat from day 1 - FALSE. See article Taliban insurgency and learn something. --TheFEARgod (Ч) 23:51, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

text: no, it's not different. They were ruling on 90% of territory, like the Chechens (in their case 100%). For your argument, the Chechen insurgency existed even before the Russia invaded in 1999.--TheFEARgod (Ч) 00:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

text: why weird? Insurgency of the X war. We got that because you didnt want insurgency phase which would make more logic. Now: Insurgency in the North Caucasus? There were insurgencies in the north caucasus before 2000. Also: Insurgency in Chechnya: there was the 1994-1996 insurgency, so we should assume that Timeline of the Second Chechen War would be more appropriate. --TheFEARgod (Ч) 00:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: so what, all engagements would be listed in that way. See example: Timeline of the War in Afghanistan (2001-present): U.S. invasion and Taliban insurgency covered both--TheFEARgod (Ч) 11:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: You know I wouldn't have a problem if this would be renamed to Timeline of the Second Chechen War, it's just that it has to be done properly right away, because there's so many articles to be renamed and redirected. - PietervHuis (talk) 00:55, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More old talk
Talk:Mid-Michigan Railroad

message: It's not clear the exact relationship between this company, the Grand Rapids Eastern Railroad and the Michigan Shore Railroad, but in recent filings with the STB it's abandoning lines on their behalf. The corporate offices are in the same location, and they seem to share management. Is MMRR just leasing the other two, or what? Mackensen (talk) 19:36, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aldo

message: The German, Spanish, French, and Italian versions of this entry all say something different, and do not refer to altus at all:
Aldo is a male Italian first name. Aldous in English.
Of Germanic origin, the name Aldo should be derived from the root ald (alt in modern German), with the literal meaning of old or, loosely speaking, experienced, wise. A second hypothesis, however, sees this as a feature name from the ancient High German athal (edel in modern German), meaning noble, of noble birth.
It should be added, for clarity, that both these terms are very common in the onomastics of Germanic origin and often are confused with each other: as an example, think of names such as ancient Aldighiero, Aldobrandro, Aldovino , etc., are also subject to an ambiguous interpretation - because of the root-Ald precisely
Aldo is an Italian name, short name of Rinaldo, the Latinized form (Reginald) of Germanic first name Reynold, which gives Renaud French. It is celebrated on March 31 (local festival) or April 26.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.164.231 (talk) 20:30, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aldo does not equal altus
Talk:Waco (disambiguation)

message: Isn´t "waco" also used to describe religious zealots, conspiracy theorists, and somehow violent crazy people? --Giftzwerg 88 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 15:10, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That's "wacko". Clarityfiend (talk) 10:28, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other uses 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
----
:Waco (disambiguation) →  – No clear primary topic, at Talk:Waco, Texas#Requested move 5 August 2023 I pointed out that the city might not qualify as primary which another user agreed with. By views the city has 18,252 but the miniseries has 9,884 and Dr Pepper has 45,143[]. The name of both the miniseries and the former name of Dr Pepper come from the city which suggests the city is primary by long-term significance however the city's name comes from Waco people which also has long-term significance. Some Google results are for the miniseries and the 1st Image one is for a film. Note that a history merge of the DAB from 2007. Crouch, Swale (talk)  18:14, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 August 2023
Talk:Survivor

message: I've checked out the policies for the links that I removed - and two of them are only mentioned as existing in the article. The actual redlink should probably stay, though it is also is only linked from one page (William W. Johnstone bibliography) which is nominated (by me) for AfD. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:10, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the novels are mentioned in the linked articles; that's why they are listed here. Ditto the unarticled songs in the music section. And I guess that William W. Johnstone bibliography might be redirected and the material merged into the author's article, and, if so, the blue link on the dab page can be changed to point to that article instead.--ShelfSkewed Talk 21:19, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Literature links
Talk:Kill Haole Day

message: I removed this: New incidents of school violence on Kill Haole Day were reported in 2006, citing http://www.hawaiireporter.com/story.aspx?294d9da5-dbb5-40e9-8f94-13712a73408c If you read the article, it does not say this had anything to do with kill haole day. Makana Chai (talk) 22:47, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed info from page

message: Kill haole day is very real. I was born and raised on Oahu and attended in order Maunawili elementary, Kailua intermediate, and Kailua High School. I am haole and both my parents were public school teachers, neither were military in fact my high school had almost no military kids as Kalaheo High School is much closer to the KMCAS (Kaneohe Marine Corps Air Station). I have gotten into dozens of fist fights for just being haole. In Hawaii most wealthy haole families send their kids to private schools to avoid persecution. My parents being public school educators sent us to public schools irregardless of the threat of racial violence. Most haole kids dont attend school on kill haole day, I always did but I was a fighter. Unpopular haole kids would routinely be threatened all year long with the promise of physical violence on said day. Any educator in the state knows that kill haole day is real and the DOE has chosen to deny that it exists rather than admit the ugly truth of its existence.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.198.119.149 (talk) 14:54, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: What is your standard for "verification"?  First-hand accounts abound, including in this talk page, yet each one is dismissed as rumor or lie.  Bullying is not typically prosecuted in court, and even if it was, could the true motive be determined?  Perhaps kids should carry hidden cameras on the last day of school?  Even then, how would they prove that it isn't an isolated incident?  It is know that anti-white sentiment exists beyond the usual in Hawaii (just like anti-black sentiment exists in Georgia beyond the usual).  All it takes is a few racist kids to declare their beatings to be part of Kill Haole Day.  It's not an official tradition, but it is not a myth or urban legend either.  Compare this to Senior Skip Day. --143.81.18.138 (talk) 11:42, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Any verified incidents?

message: An RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 16:53, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC 

message: I lived in Hawaii from 1972-1975 (military family, public school and private school). and while it was laways rumored that the last day of school was "Kill Haole Day" I never saw anything like organized bullying, and rarely any bullying motivated by other than personalities.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.230.146.124 (talk) 02:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: ==
Talk:Brookula

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:14, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Nemicolopterus

message: I don't know the family for the taxobox. If anyone finds it please add it. Thanks. Grundle2600 (talk) 19:56, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nemicolopterus is described as a basal member of the Dsungaripteroidea.--MWAK (talk) 08:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you! Grundle2600 (talk) 20:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: But Dinoguy is right: it is here essentially used as a clade concept. --MWAK (talk) 19:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. In all our other articles we're using Unwin's superfamilies/clades. Kellner takes the traditional superfamilies and uses them in a completely different way, as nested sequence leading up to the azhdarchs. Pterodactyloidea contains Dsungaripteroidea contains Ornithocheiroidea. I prefer Unwin's method as it preserved the original usage and doesn't shatter every ICZN rule in the book if you transliterate the phylogeny into a taxonomy. ;) You can see both versions here List of pterosaur classifications. Dinoguy2 (talk) 22:27, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks everyone! Grundle2600 (talk) 04:26, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I don't know the family
Talk:Aodh (given name)

message: Some suggestions I've material but no time for now:
* Aed be amalgamated with Aodh
* More cognomens and variant spellings be listed and cross-ref'd
* More detail on Indo European root (aidho, aidhis) and cognates
* Gather name lists together in one place
* Make distinction between mythology - 'gods' - and fact
* IPA characters and pronunciation
Anyone interested? Concord113 (talk) 01:18, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool, I'm interested to see how this article evolves. I just fiddled a bit and have given everything a source, but it seems you've got some better ones.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 10:54, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

text: I think the main article for the pet forms could probably go over at Aidan, or somewhere, or do you think it's better to cover all the Gaelic names here? Maybe that would be better. There are so many forms of these names, it's confusing. I've redirected Aodh here.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 11:14, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

text: Whoops. "Cut and paste" moves are frowned upon because they mess up the contributions in the article's history, but we can ask an admin to move it @ Wikipedia:Requested moves. I'll do that now. We can keep working on this page for now and eventually an admin will move the title to "Aodh (given name)". I think a good source for the article would be Irish names by Ó Corráin and Maguire, but I haven't had any luck tracking down a copy.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 04:53, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions
Talk:Playaz Circle

message: Great BAND!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.67.93.123 (talk) 01:43, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: So, Playa Circle formed in 1997, but never released anything until 2007?
Gosh these guys are lazy. --75.187.106.39 (talk) 16:00, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Player Circle

message: Did Playaz Circle really end is 2013?--MRivera25 (talk) 17:24, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disestablishment in 2013
Talk:Cardwell v. American Bridge Co.

message: For that reason, it's not clear to me that this is the *same* company as the one linked to in the lede. Is there a source for that?  See also List_of_companies_consolidated_into_American_Bridge_Company... there is no predecessor company with this name, not exactly.  ++Lar: t/c 17:36, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[American Bridge Company]] was organized in 1900
Talk:Bryan v. Kennett

message: It appears that most of this article has been copied and pasted from the source text of the case.  --Eastlaw talk ⁄ contribs 01:07, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

message: I have been a practicing lawyer in USA for some years.  How did this article in its current form as I write this get a "B"? As someone else pointed out, it seems to have been largely copied out of a court document.  Moreover it is hard to understand because the language is from a previous century.  The part of the article that appears to have been added really does not get at the significance of this case. I understand that sometimes people copy stuff over to get a head start on an article and that furthermore this might not be a copyvio here because the court opinions are public documents.  However, it doesn't make for any sort of a useful article much less a B-class one. When I see ratings like this it causes me to lose a lot of faith in the ratings system and just think of it as arbitrary ratings that are sometimes good and sometimes not. TheBlinkster (talk) 23:20, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I blanked most of this and rewrote it into something readable that has more info than just a cut and paste of the opinion.  It's certainly not B-class now either but it's way better than the last awful version was. It could use some more sources and analysis of the holding and its effects on international law, treaty law, property law, etc. which someone needs to dig out of secondary sources (probably law journal articles and law books, this isn't one of the Supremes' greatest hits). TheBlinkster (talk) 03:56, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-Class?  Are you kidding me?
Talk:Adagio for Strings (Tiësto song)

message: This sounds a little biased.
Can someone rewrite this?
"Despite the release of the tracks, Tiësto's Adagio For Strings (2003) offers more than just classical music, but it shows what trance is made of."
Centrisian (talk) 20:11, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV Issue?

message: That's the release date of Just Be with Adagio as the 4th single on it. So, to me this means the single was FIRST released in 2004 (Netherlands and US), it's not that it was still a secret to the world, the single was out. On an album. Whatever happened later is second.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.199.57.165 (talk) 18:16, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  released on 6 April 2004 in the Netherlands
Talk:Dead Leaves

message: I find it absurd that the main article is one sentence long, and there is a separate article listing characters from the show, especially since this is a one-hour show. These articles are very worthy merge candidates, IMHO. --nihon 21:38, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. I figured I may as well no one was really paying attention to this article. :-) --nihon 06:13, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I've never seen this show, so I have no clue what it's about. I don't have any info on the characters either. The character sections need to be expanded greatly or else collapsed into one or two sections. --nihon 06:13, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia contains spoilers. If you don't want to know what happens, don't read Wikipedia :-) –anemoneprojectors– 20:30, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: "Chinko Drill
An easily identifiable character with a drill for his masculinity, like Tetsuo."
Tetsuo from Akira? I wasn't aware they talked about his "masculinity" to any extent in the film or manga. Can anyone back up this information, or at least correct it? --UberMan5000 02:06, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's been a while since I saw it, but I assume it's a reference to the film Tetsuo: The Iron Man, and not the Akira character. I've changed the link to reflect that. Kelvingreen 17:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What Does This Mean?

message: Am I the only one who noticed that Dead Leaves and episode 5 of FLCL, Brittle Bullet, have many strikingly similar scenes?  Such as the fight scene in the prison and the barbor shop, in Dead Leaves and FLCL respectively.  There are many other scenes throught FLCL that are very similar to scenes in Dead Leaves, such as the catapilar (Dead Leaves) and the Terminal Core (FLCL).  I hope I'm not just losing my mind.  --Tonku 14:51, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Same director - same style  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyril (talk • contribs) 13:29, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  FLCL reference. 

message: Is the US Airing section pertinent?  I mean TV shows and movies are on TV all the time.  I don't see why its a significant statement to say when it was on the Scifi channel.  
I think this information should be removed or at least put in the Released section on the right-hand side.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Corvato (talk • contribs) 04:32, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Airing 

message: ANN THEM AnimeFringe 1 AnimeFringe 2 OtakuUSA Opencooper (talk) 04:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Hawk of the Hills (short story)

message: I hope the article is of superior quality now and the notability is clearer.  Robert E. Howard is a significant enough author that a work of his published in his own lifetime and regarded to be one of his best should be considered notable enough for an article on Wikipedia. - AdamBMorgan (talk) 19:25, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:That Green Gentleman (Things Have Changed)

message: Shouldn't it be called "That Green Gentleman"? --69.56.125.78 (talk) 20:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

message: As noted by Roxyr above, it seems like the song is now "That Green Gentleman (Things Have Changed)". Should the title be changed? --The Experimental Film (talk) 21:07, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That doesn't make any sense. MTV says it's "That Green Gentleman (Things Have Changed)" and so do many other sites. It should be changed unless someone can find an official source saying it's "That Green Gentlemen" or at least until the CD is released and we can see what it is listed as there. Timmeh! 22:38, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

text: I think it's best just to leave it and wait the few more days until the album's release to see what the track listing says, though if that picture with all the titles on it is really the back cover of the album, it's really "That Green Gentlemen". This is also an issue with two other titles [She Had The World being 'Snooze Me, Ms. Britches and Behind The Sea being Sushi In A Tuxedo In The Clams Casino] and during the whole back cover hunt thingy, they said the titles have changed. I guess we'll just have to wait until the CD to confirmThedarkchao93 (talk) 05:56, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Can someone who's already got the album tell us the actual title of this song, please? --The Experimental Film (talk) 21:12, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Done Timmeh! 00:17, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

text: So am I correct in assuming the correct title is "That Green Gentleman"? Timmeh! 01:18, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the correct title is "That Green Gentleman". Jimu00 (talk) 02:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Actually, the complete correct title is "That Green Gentleman (Things Have Changed)". Pisces03x (talk) 7:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Alrite, so I'll move the page to the correct title then. Timmeh! 01:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title change
Talk:Pan-Serbism

message: You might as well merge it with Serb Nationalism/Irredentism because it's the same damn article, this is as retarded as calling American patriotism "Pan-Americanism". Whoever made this article is mentally challenged or something. 99.236.221.124 (talk) 23:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serbs are a nation 

message: This article involves the same subject matter covered in the article Greater Serbia. There is no need for a separate article for this topic.--R-41 (talk) 21:55, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into Greater Serbia article
Talk:Brooklyn Zoo (song)

message: The Brooklyn Bronx? Where exactly is that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.203.206.179 (talk) 05:16, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brooklyn Bronx 

message: As far as I know Brooklyn Zu took their name after this track, so that song cannot refer to the group. Tashi Talk to me 23:59, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brooklyn Zoo 

message: What about the Beat? The article only talks about the Rap and Lyrics. Hip Hop music isn´t just Rap!
Steffen AM 9/9/2022 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:DF:8F03:DED8:18F3:9B37:6A2F:AA87 (talk) 14:32, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the Beat?