Talk:National Assembly of Pakistan

message: what is it about nadeem malik being next pres.xcxcx\
what is the
:i thought prez. is musharraf and he has no plans to step down. nids 20:44, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: nadeem malik

message: pls sum1 add the new elections results table  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imadaqu93 (talk • contribs) 12:52, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  new 

message: The article should address the fact that many MNA's are landowners with vast estates and that often that there is not a choice for the poor residents of these estates to vote any other way but the way dictated by the landowning family.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sublimeport (talk • contribs) 21:15, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Landowners 

message: There has been an April 2013 Merger Proposal made requesting the following articles: 1st National Assembly of Pakistan, 3rd National Assembly of Pakistan, 4th National Assembly of Pakistan, 7th National Assembly of Pakistan, 8th National Assembly of Pakistan, 9th National Assembly of Pakistan, 10th National Assembly of Pakistan, and 11th National Assembly of Pakistan all be merged into the National Assembly (Pakistan) article or the History of Pakistan National Assembly. 
Additional input regarding both proposals should be made below, in this section.  Thank you. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 02:30, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on National Assembly of Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130606033120/http://www.thenews.com.pk/article-92561-National-Assembly-stands-dissolved to http://www.thenews.com.pk/article-92561-National-Assembly-stands-dissolved
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130605172427/http://www.thenews.com.pk/article-103372-Historic-Transition:-Newly-elected-MNAs-take-oath to http://www.thenews.com.pk/article-103372-Historic-Transition:-Newly-elected-MNAs-take-oath
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130605212829/http://www.thenews.com.pk/article-103330-14th-elected-National-Assemblys-inaugural-session-today- to http://www.thenews.com.pk/article-103330-14th-elected-National-Assemblys-inaugural-session-today-
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:45, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on National Assembly of Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130612121031/http://ecp.gov.pk/Misc/Reserved/01-Reserved%20Seats%20in%20NA%20Women%2004-06-2013-0345.pdf to http://ecp.gov.pk/Misc/Reserved/01-Reserved%20Seats%20in%20NA%20Women%2004-06-2013-0345.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130613004910/http://ecp.gov.pk/Misc/Reserved/02-Reserved%20Seats%20in%20NA%20Minority%2031-05-2013.pdf to http://ecp.gov.pk/Misc/Reserved/02-Reserved%20Seats%20in%20NA%20Minority%2031-05-2013.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:49, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: Hi. Whoever added the seat change for the PTI, reducing it to 152, I’ve seen many sources, and all sources and news outlets say that PTI has 158 seats, and this is the only source that reduced the PTI seats. If you could kindly explain to me the reasoning behind all this, that’ll be great. Thanks! Wbhai89 (talk) 21:30, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  PTI has 158 seats 

message: Parliament's and political status is not clear in Pakistan since the start of 2022 Pakistani constitutional crisis, The matter is in supreme court but this user:Zk911912 continuously removing content from article. Please don't allow any edits on this page until situation goes clear. 103.141.159.74 (talk) 12:23, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: requests for increases to the page protection level should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 April 2022 

message: National Assembly of Pakistan has been restored by the Supreme Court of Pakistan, So kindly please restore my version of "Revision as of 10:21, 3 April 2022".
Source: https://www.geo.tv/amp/410037-back-to-april-3-supreme-court-declares-deputy-speakers-ruling-null-and-void-restores-national-assemblyhttps://www.dailypakistan.com.pk/07-Apr-2022/supreme-court-restores-pakistan-s-national-assembly-terms-deputy-speaker-s-ruling-unconstitutional%3fversion=amp103.141.159.74 (talk) 15:54, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 April 2022 

message: There is no opposition in the National Assembly, all the combined opposition resigned except 1 seat of GDA. The rest are the parties in alliance with government under the nane of PDM (Pakistan Democratic Alliance). Please make corrections. The PTI members shown in opposition are are theoretically disqualified under Article 63A of constitution of Pakistan for violating Party decisions. So mark them as independent or may be under PDM. Kindly make following corrections. 120.17.182.41 (talk) 20:38, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:54, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 April 2022 

message: I have big question about MNA's of Pakistan. Are they representative of the people of Islamic republic of Pakistan or the representative of their party. As court said they are de-seat. Because they didn't follow the party policy. Yes court is right at a perspective that is they have been elected as a party member and got a ticket and have won the election in the face of party not in their own face. But real question is that are they representative of people or are they representative of their Party. If they are they face of people not they party so why are they de-seated. I am not a PML(N) supporter and nor a PTI supporter. Basic of mine is that are MNA's of Pakistan are the representative of people and if yes soo are they the representative of their more than the people. Pls I want an answer 111.88.193.168 (talk) 17:14, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  MNA or not ?? 

message: D 37.111.135.114 (talk) 03:24, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2018 election in Pakistan results