lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Politics of Novi Sad

message: I deleted Bulgarian name, because i never heard, or seen on the sign on city hall, that NS had official name in Bulgarian. Maybe that name existed for NS, but it wasn't official. My suggestion that we keep that name only in main article NS (#name). --Göran Smith 10:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bulgarian name
Talk:USS Blackfish

message: Can somebody confirm Commander Raymond W. Johnson (Class of 1930) had command for her first patrol? Blair (Silent Victory, p898) has it John F. Davidson, with Raymond W. Johnson commanding Herring.  Trekphiler 10:11, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: You're in charge, here

message: I appreciate your change to my edit. I have now provided a source. I understand it is a primary source available online but I believe it meets the verifiability standard as it is being used only for factual material and not for any matter of interpretation. If I am incorrect and this falls under original research and the revision need to be removed again, I understand completely. Just wanted the entry to be more complete.
Ssvonavec (talk) 20:33, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improperly sourced edit
Talk:RMS Empress of Australia (1919)

message: What does RMS stand for?  There's no explanation and no link. 86.153.216.204 21:12, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "RMS" is an acronym for "Royal Mail Ship." --Tenmei (talk) 15:15, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: RMS

message: The process of changing the name of this article revealed a number of links.  It is unclear whether these links should or should not be incorporated in the article's "See also" section.  They are posted here for evaluation and review by other editors. --Tenmei (talk) 15:15, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plausibly useful links?

message: See explanatory comment at Talk:RMS Empress of Canada (1928) --Tenmei (talk) 20:03, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains]]

message: Could be interesting. DirkjanenBert (talk) 12:46, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could someone explain the name?
Talk:Blackbud

message: I removed the link that supposedly led to the lead singer since it actually led to another guy with the same name. Until we get more information on the members lets just list the band members' names, okay? A29105 (talk) 16:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Tompw 12:33, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:1851 French coup d'état

message: I have translated from French. Please check for factual errors and/or grammar mistakes.
:Ok, I will do this. Many thanks :] Yug (talk) 13:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: cs
Talk:Panelling

message: text from Wainscoting talk page pre-merger Erk|Talk -- I like traffic lights -- 04:32, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wainscoting

message: I'm for it. Boiserie, wainscoting, and panelling are all stubs. Together they could be a reasonable article, and panelling is a good blanket topic for them. "By your powers combined, I am Captain Panel!"
Oh god, I am a dork. Erk|Talk -- I like traffic lights -- 00:09, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: how is that? It needs better integration but it includes all the previous information. The top blurb needs work especially. Erk|Talk -- I like traffic lights -- 04:17, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: I moved the following contribution here:
"In episode 20 of the BBC sketch comedy Monty Python's Flying Circus, wainscoting is mentioned (the context being that sheep have invaded the walls of an old lady's house). During the scene, one of the characters trails off by stating that the name sounds like a dorset village. Immediatly the scene switches to the (fictional) village of 'Wains Cotting' where a lady runs out of her house and shouts, "We've been mentioned on the telly!"
When the word 'wainscoting' is said once more by the same character, the scene switches back to Wains Cotting where the lady shouts, "They said it again!""
It is unsourced and I fail to see how it is either encyclopaedic or benefits the article. Views, please.TerriersFan 23:26, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monty Python's Flying Circus 

message: Both articles ("Panelling" and "Dado (Architecture)") seem to amount to the same thing.  If the two words mean the same thing, perhaps these articles should be combined.
Respectfully,
Harold Helson  — Preceding unsigned comment added by HaroldHelson (talk • contribs) 17:50, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the difference between dado and wainscot
Talk:Microsoft Reader

message: Are there any alternate programs for reading .lit text files? Which are they? --h_a 22:28, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would also like to see some alternative programs listed. --Krbrowning 00:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that there are any — .LIT files include DRM, which makes this pretty much impossible.  I know that there used to be a program to break the DRM — it turned the .LIT file into a directory of HTML documents.  That's the only other program that reads the format that I'm aware of. —Tom W.M. 03:40, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Some alternate readers/projects on this subject are these: ConvertLITdotcom and ABC Amber LIT Converter. --h_a 20:33, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Try Tiny eBook Reader --124.120.189.206 09:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  alternate .lit file readers? 

message: Does anyone know if there is a fix for this? Has Microsoft abandoned Reader? It seems strange that a company like Microsoft would come out with a new version of Word (2007) with this incompatibility issue.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.238.222.206 (talk) 20:10, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I very much think that this software is abandonware  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.208.183.44 (talk) 09:05, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  MS Reader add-in is not compatible with Word 2007 

message: It would be nice to have something about the history of Microsoft's cancelled ebook device from the late 1990s.  A pad device had been designed as part of the reader project, but was cancelled.  Their failure to follow through with that project is interesting in the context of modern iPad and android devices. DonPMitchell (talk) 18:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ebook device project 
Talk:Meatal stenosis

message: Incorrect use of Language? Yes, there certainly is! I don't feel that the choice of words is an issue of political correctitude, but rather a question of accuracy. Using the term "uncircumcised" to describe an intact, natural, normal penis perpetuates the typically American, myopic misconception that a penis with its foreskin surgically amputated is natural or normal, when the exact opposite is true. "Uncircumcised" clearly implies to the reader that the surgically altered penis is medically normal. Would one call a man with both arms a non-amputee? In countries where genital mutilation is uncommon, or even illegal, a circumcised or "cut" penis is unquestionably viewed as abnormal and unnatural. I think it all depends on how one wishes to see himself.----MrEguy 10:29, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Intact" was not used as an adjective to describe the penis.  It was used as an adjective to describe the male.  If I approached a random person on the street and described myself as an "intact male," they would have absolutely no clue that I was referring to my penis.  If I described myself as an "uncircumcised male," they would know exactly what I was referring to.  To use your analogy, you would certainly describe someone as a non-amputee if you were making medical comparisons based on possible complications from amputation. Sperril 15:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to add, the only way I would find "intact" acceptable is if the statement read "....in males with an intact foreskin." You can feel free to change it to this if you'd like to. Sperril 15:37, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Intact" vs. "Uncircumcised"

message: There is another article on urethral stricture. This article indicates that meatal stenosis is synonymous for urethral stricture; indeed, the ICD-9 and DiseaseDB codes are similar or identical, though the MeSH code is not. I'm adding a template to suggest merging the two articles into the latter, since it is listed in the urologic disease template. --Joe Sewell (talk) 20:47, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I just confirmed that the ICD-9 code here is more specific than the one at urethral stricture. Furthermore, the two MeSH specifiers lead to the same page through different paths. --Joe Sewell (talk) 21:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am not sure and I am not a medical expert either.  Meatal stenosis is the narrowing of the meatus (urethral opening) whereas urethral stricture is narrowing of the urethra.  Meatal stenosis is often as a result of circumcision because the ammonia in the urine inflames the meatus (and presumably causes it to narrow). Tremello22 (talk) 22:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meatal stenois = urethral stricture? 

message: One of the sources quoted in this article says, "Meatal stenosis only occurs in males."  The places this article references meatal stenosis in females are unsourced.  What sources indicate that meatal stenosis occurs in females, as the article now states?  Blackworm (talk) 22:37, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Females?
Talk:USS Cero (SS-225)

message: I added date stricken (30 June 1967) & fate (Hulked as a memorial, St. Louis, IL) based on Lenton, American Submarines, p64.  Trekphiler 10:30, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Hulk

message: Added sections. Hue White 20:20, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sections
Talk:USS Corvina

message: The specs need changing to these:
Displacement,    Surfaced:    Submerged:	1526 tons (1550t),  2424 tons (2460 t)
Length:                                           	307 ft (93.6m) waterline, 311ft 9in (95m) overall
Beam:                                             	27.3 ft (8.3 m)
Draft:                                            	19.3 ft (5.9 m)
Test depth:                                       	300 ft (91.4m)
Speed,    Surfaced:    Submerged:       	20.25 knots (37 km/h)    8.75 knots (16 km/h)
Propulsion:                                       	four 1350-hp  (1010kW) 16-cylinder General Motors 278A diesel engines  two 1370hp (1020 kW) General Electric electric motors (two 126-cell Exide main storage batteries),  two shafts
Submerged Endurance:                              	48 hours at 2 knots (3.7kph)
Patrol Endurance:                                 	75 days
Range:                                            	11,000 nmi. (20,000 km)   at 10 knots (18.5kph) surfaced
Complement:                                       	70 officers and enlisted men (peacetime), 80-85 (war)
Armament:                                         	10 × 21 in torpedo tubes (53 cm),    (6 forward, 4 aft),    24 torpedoes; 1 × 3 in (76.2mm) / 50 cal deck gun, 2 × .50 cal. machine guns, 2 × .30 cal. machine guns
10:34, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: By the numbers
Talk:Andrew Breitbart

message: Text and references copied from Orson Bean to Andrew Breitbart,  See former article's history for a list of contributors.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:56, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution

message: the intro had these words  as part of the sentence about his Breitbart news site: 
 "along with multiple other "BIG" sites – BIGHollywood, BIGGovernment, BIGJournalism."
that is not self explanatory, so until someone can explain what that means, or what those are,  it has been removed. Are they website names? are they just  someone's idea of what he  stood for or against? this isn't clear at all and needs to be expressed in a proper form. They were not links, and not expressed as .coms or other  domain names. So,  if you want that on there, at least let the public know what you are talking about. That would be proper journalism. 
Meat Eating Orchid (talk) 01:01, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  intro has odd unexplained references to things - removed 

message: :Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:08, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory]] has an [[WP:RFC|RFC]]

message: Article has it right in opening paragraph, "conservative journalist"... Later in article he is called far right. This is wrong. 2603:6081:7600:1D00:388D:625E:9345:6AB0 (talk) 01:52, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: If the reliable sources call him or his sites far-right, that's what we say here. We don't include original research. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 02:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction 

message: (self explanatory) 120.21.18.26 (talk) 18:12, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No, per WP:CONTROVERSYSECTION. Self-explanatory. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:07, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism and controversies section needed 

message: "....far-right news and opinion website, which has been described as misogynistic, xenophobic, and racist by academics and journalists."
"far-right news and opinion website, which has been described as misogynistic, xenophobic, and racist by SOME ? MANY academics and journalists."
Not every journalist in the world has the same opinion surely? 82.31.108.103 (talk) 11:44, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some or Many. Journalists and academics don't all have the same opinion.
Talk:Savitri Khanolkar

message: The subject was the desginer Param Vir Chakra, India's highest military decoration, and is closely associated with the Indian Army. However, I am a bit confused to decide whether the subject falls within the scope of our project or not. Your thoughts please, Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:06, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, I'm not sure to be honest. I think that it probably depends upon whether or not her involvement with designing the PVC is one of the things that makes her notable. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 22:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Pinging  for advice. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:34, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Per 's point, Savitri Khanolkar is noteworthy for this act only, so including her in WikiProject Military History|South Asian group is in order, imho. AshLin (talk) 15:01, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  MilHis project consideration
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/The Wiseguys: Comedy You Can't Refuse

message: This is my argument for not deleting The WiseGuys Wikipedia article
The WiseGuys meet the Wikipedia:Notability (comedy) in the following ways:
:1)  There are  multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the person/group/show and its creators/producers, such as articles in The Commercial Appeal and the Memphis Flyer. They have also performed on local television news/entertainment programs.
:2)  One of the troupe members, Larry Clark, is a world-renowned clown and magician.  He was most recently seen on television's "America's Got Talent" which was seen worldwide.  Larry Clark has also toured with Ringling Brothers and Barnum and Bailey Circus, Cirque Du Soliel, Cirque Magnifique, Jim Rose Circus Sideshow Jim Rose Circus Sideshow, all of which are internationally touring shows.
:3)  Though it was it's first year, the SouthEastern Comedy Arts Festival was a "major comedy show" in that there were troupes from four different states in attendance.
:4)  The award, "best shortform improv troupe", won at the above mentioned festival, was accomplished by beating seven of the best and brightest improv companies in the southeast region.
:4)  In January 2004, The WiseGuys performed onstage with The English Lovers, an improv troupe from Vienna, Austria. 
As one of only three improvisational theater companies in Memphis, Tn, The WiseGuys have been a major feature in the growing comedy community.  They are a feature at the new Comedy, TN Comedy Club and perform out of the city as well.
Also, please remember, from the guidelines:
:Please note that the failure to meet any of these criteria does not mean an article must be deleted; likewise, the meeting of any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept. These are merely rules of thumb which some editors choose to keep in mind when deciding whether or not to keep an article that is on articles for deletion.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Apatronoftruth 10:47, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The WiseGuys are the real deal
Talk:Jumping after Wirkola

message: Writing a priori and a posteriori instead of a priori and a posteriori would correspond to the 
a priori belief that Wirkola's 
a posteriori stardom was guaranteed by his a priori stardom, each time he jumped, which a posteriori might correspond to a good approximation to the truth, but which nevertheless, in the present encyclopaedic context, would be classified as a non-neutral point of view, so I re-instate the 2nd version. Slavatrudu 10:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Mind Benders (book)

message: As far as I recall, it was released onto the Internet by Martin Hunt, who did a quick OCR text scan. Then I proofread and cleaned it up and put the HTML version on my site, with Cyril's permission.
I don't have a third-party source saying this, though I undoubtedly made an a.r.s post at the time saying I'd done this ...
Did CAN release a scan as well? - David Gerard 01:10, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I must be going senile in my middle age. I just read what I wrote on my own page  at the time, it being precisely what the article says. Excuse me. References! They help you not forget your own words! - David Gerard 01:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Released by the old CAN"? Um ... it was me, I think. 

message: Found an article about the Church of Scientology of Canada trying to ban the book, by threathening to cite libraries as defendant in a libel suit against Vosper (along with Malko and Kaufman) if they were to offer Vosper's book (or Malko's and Kaufman's books.) This deserve to be integrated in the article, but I want to find information about the outcome of the libel suits first. Raymond Hill 22:12, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds great.  Let us know when you have more sources - even though that first one is excellent on its own merits...  Smee 03:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Church of Scientology of Canada tried to ban the book
Talk:Baum–Walker Stadium

message: In response to the call for an image, and unfortunately not having one myself already, I took a screenshot of an overhead of a satellite image and placed it there. Hopefully this will suffice until someone can go by and take one. (Cardsplayer4life 06:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Automated telephone survey

message: Please explain why you have categorised this as spam?  It contains no references to a company or to outside websites.  Automated survey technology is part of this world!
*Well, it aggrandizes it pretty... grandiosely.  And you linked to it 5 times in another article.  And it seems you have a history of spamming :-(  It just seems like it's promoting a product, or at least a type of product.  Miltopia 11:19, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Exasperation

message: The article cited in this comment  was about a pre-election poll taken in a specific Congressional campaign where the candidate (Republican Richard Pombo who was leading in conventional polls) did not agree with the poll and he and conventional pollsters both stated their distrust for this method.  Both have a bias that certainly should be considered.  Ironically, the automated poll got it right!  It called the race a dead heat with a slight lean toward the Democratic candidate, who actually won the race .  Arguments cited against the automated poll were correctable within the design of the poll itself.  This was achieved by obtaining further information from the polled individuals.
If anything, this cited article and the subsequent election result should be cited as a plug for automated surveys. :-) Calltech 14:25, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed "less reliable" comment
Talk:Toni Collette & the Finish

message: i don't think this article should be deleted. i think it is important for this article to be here for anyone who wants to find out info about the band. i know its short at the moment but i will be beefing it up in the very near future.(This comment added by Grillen ·  2006-11-15T06:17:06)
* It is recommended by Wikipedia that you don't delete old comments, but to archive them instead. Please feel free to make an archive for this page if you so wish. Happy editing.   Esradekan Gibb      "Talk" 13:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ben Whishaw

message: Seeing as the fact that it's probably not going to get a release is well sourced, I don't see why we should list it in whishaw's credits. Or if we do, perhaps "2006 - The Restraint of Beasts (film, unreleased)" would be more appropriate? Amo (talk) 17:35, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Restraint of Beasts

message: Ben's full name is Benjamin, but has been wrongly quoted as 'Benedict' on some websites including this one. I have verified this with the elctoral register and am trying to correct this inaccuracy.tedb (talk)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tedbear1 (talk • contribs) 17:20, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A less-usual surname. Any clues about his parentage, for those who have known people called Whishaw?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.247.240 (talk) 00:02, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ben's name 

message: Would it be possible to create two separate lists for Ben's stage and screen credits? That would make them more assessable and the lists less confusing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.164.115.18 (talk) 04:18, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selected Credits 

message: is he going to be in bond 25? releasing in 2020
i just figured if he is, we can add it to the filmography  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.4.183.42 (talk) 00:25, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  bond?
Talk:President of the United states

message: As a result of the discussion in the second AfD nomination, as determined in the post-closing discussion the contents of this article were merged with President of the United States.  Do not recreate the article or change the redirect.  Jerry lavoie 18:29, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. – Luna Santin (talk) 02:38, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kingsley Hall

message: I've just been listerning to [http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/thethingsweforgot/pip/mue6k/ Things We Forgot to Remember:
The Jarrow March] where Michael Portillo talks about a series of Hunger Marches which took place in the 1930's these were distinct from the Jarrow March, yet often confused. I'm wondering if the reference here 
:In 1935, hunger marchers on the Jarrow March stayed at the Hall.
is really to the Jarrow March or one of the other hunger marches? --Salix (talk): 20:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Checking that fact now... Gordo (talk) 10:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  hunger march or Jarrow March? 