Talk:Minotaur-C

message: The article states two figures:  
...failed during the launch of the $270m Orbiting Carbon Observatory spacecraft. and ...Launch vehicle and services for OCO are estimated at $54m. Could someone explain the difference (in the text, I suggest)? -DePiep (talk) 09:15, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cost 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:32, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Taurus 3210 launching ROCSAT 2.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Calling Antares a Taurus successor is original research.  The technologies, capabilities, and target markets are completely different.  That its development name was "Taurus II" is completely irrelevant. I plan to revert the statement again if there is no supporting reference in a week. --IanOsgood (talk) 21:40, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh? Successor to is not the same as evolution of. Martijn Meijering (talk) 21:46, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The other implication of "successor" is that one replaces the other. AFAIK, they are both to be continued. If anything, Antares is the Delta II successor. --IanOsgood (talk) 14:37, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

text: Can the assertion be reworded (omitting "successor") in such a way that it accurately reflects the connection between the two and is well sourced? (sdsds - talk) 03:57, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: 2 years later, done. Though both rockets have since been renamed, they share a common Castor 120-derived solid stage. Anythingcouldhappen (talk) 02:57, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antares is not a Taurus successor 

message: Is this rocket out of business or is there any development since the last failures?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.22.127.229 (talk) 09:06, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Flew in 2017. OkayKenji (talk page) 22:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Minotaur-C. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100204060427/http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/factsheet_department_nasa/ to http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/factsheet_department_nasa/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:12, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Minotaur-C. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070202125009/http://astronautix.com/lvs/taurus.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/taurus.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:09, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Minotaur-C. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150930174408/http://www.orbitalatk.com/flight-systems/space-launch-vehicles/minotaur/docs/FS003_02_OA_3695%20Minotaur-C.pdf to http://www.orbitalatk.com/flight-systems/space-launch-vehicles/minotaur/docs/FS003_02_OA_3695%20Minotaur-C.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: Trying to sort out facts
Currently we have:
* Height - 27.9 m 
* Diameter - 2.35 m
* Weight - 73,000 kg
These parameters were added in 2006. 
This ref says
* Height - 30 to 32 m
* Diameter - Not mentioned 
* Weight - 77,000 kg 
This ref 
* Height - 26 to 32 m
* Diameter - Not mentioned 
* Weight - 73,000 - 77,000 kg 
Any comments? OkayKenji (talk page) 22:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height/Diameter/Weight