Talk:Kaneva

message: I am supporting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Massively multiplayer online games with this entry. Support appreciated. See Kaneva Game Platform too. I do intend to add more reference. How about a little wiki love? AGibson 19:07, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you do add more references (anyone), please do it the correct way. I just corrected the format. Panfakes 13:22, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is there no section for the virtual world of Kavena?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? I thought that a page about a company who's main purpose was to run a MMOG should have another section talking about the game. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.83.82.171 (talk • contribs) 12:52, 25 July 2007
:Look at the title of the article. It's about Kaneva, Inc., not Kaneva the platform or the MMO. - Tenmiles 18:52, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More pages needed 

message: Has anyone noticed that the edits made by Gframe (a not-disinterested party) smack of corporate promotion? "Kaneva is the first virtual entertainment world that unifies the 2D web with a 3D experience by integrating social networking, shared media, and collaborative online communities into a modern-day, immersive 3D Virtual World." I'm sorry, but A) that sounds more like a PR blurb than an impartial description of the product, and B) it's simply untrue. Second Life has had live 2D websites and streaming music/video plastered all over its 3D landscape for years. Would someone else who knows more about Kaneva than I do and who does not work for the company please try to revise this article in NPOV? - Tenmiles 18:41, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd love to help, but I don't know jack about it. You could try explaining WP:NPOV to  in the hopes that he'd fix it himself... —Disavian (talk/contribs) 18:46, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, with all due respect; I don't know if you work for the company, but you're in the same area, and are responsible for creating the article about Klaus, so I'm sure you can understand how that doesn't necessarily make you look like a disinterested party yourself. - Tenmiles 19:17, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He donated a lot of money to Georgia Tech, and I started WikiProject Georgia Tech. It's absurd to accuse me of a COI conflict of the same scope as that of Gframe, who is obviously the subject of his own article. I'm only interested in the subject as far as it applies to Georgia Tech. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 21:52, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I apologize; I'm sure I could have phrased my thoughts better. I did not mean to accuse you of anything. I observed that Greg Frame had written his own article, as well as contributed substantially to this one, in what sounded very like a self-promotional tone. I was curious to see if Klaus was similarly responsible for his own article, but saw your name instead. Glancing at your user page showed me your geographical ties - I regret that I did not pay enough attention to note your involvement in WikiProject Georgia Tech. - Tenmiles 06:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reads like shamless self-promotion