lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Willam Belli

message: One would be forgiven for thinking Willam edited his own Filmography section. It looks like every role Willam had as an extra has been included. It needs some extreme pruning. Cjhard (talk) 01:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, the Filmography+Discography sections are way too long - they're over half the article. I think the simplest thing would be to split off into a separate Willam Belli filmography article. Trimming the included roles is an interesting idea as well. Is there any kind of consensus around inclusion criteria when making filmography/discography/bibliography tables? One blunt measure would be to remove entries where the work isn't bluelinked, though that might be a bit harsh. Should probably also take into account the size of the role. Curious how other articles handle this problem. Colin M (talk) 19:51, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmography section 

message: * https://www.billboard.com/photos/8463635/drag-race-queens-charts-record ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:59, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source re: Billboard charts 

message: I came across this article whilst reverting vandalism on Huggle, and am now reading it. I have noticed that three different sets of pronouns are used in the article; he, she, and they. Normally, in accordance with the Manual of Style, we stick to the usage of one set of pronouns preferred by the individual, however I note that this individual is a drag queen and therefore may use one pronoun in drag and another out of it. I'd like for us to be able to rectify the issue, and look forward to any correspondence received below. Patient Zerotalk 00:00, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronoun inconsistencies
Talk:Gene Youngblood

message: I stamped this entry with an "Original Research" template because it makes very strong claims about Youngblood's work while only citing an unverifiable personal email. --Furste (talk) 18:27, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research 

message: Dropped a couple tags, but decided to just fix the most glaring problem: the ludicrous amount of detail (all his academic and popular publications, lectures, reviews, boards.... come on). Wikipedia is not a place for a CV. Did some rewording, wikilinking, ref fixing, etc. too but I can't say I was previously familiar with the gentleman, though, so I hope someone else will continue to improve the article (the section headings and the academia section in particular are quite weak as I've left them). --Rhododendrites (talk) 21:11, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The Bibliography section started to explode again. Authored books are generally good for inclusion, but please don't list all of his articles, presentations, recordings, etc. The recordings in particular are given no context in the article. If their notability can be shown via third party reliable sources, you may want to add (a) a short section explaining his production work and (b) a section like Bibliography but [depending on the kinds of materials] Discography, Filmography, Exhibitions, or the like. --Rhododendrites (talk) 16:16, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: A long list of works and other material is available in the history of this redirect: Gene Youngblood (media arts) if any of it is ever deemed appropriate for the article.  —Anne Delong (talk) 04:21, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP is not a CV
Talk:Surprised by Joy

message: Did CS Lewis really use the term "upperclassmen" to describe senior boys at Malvern? I have only ever heard this term in a US context. Could we substitute a more appropriate word? Or at least provide a link to a definition of upperclassmen?
Rachel Pearce 13:43, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

message: The copyright in this Fontana Books edition reads: "First published in 1935 by Geoffrey Bles / First issued in Fontana Books 1959 / Twelfth Impression November 1972". Is this just a typo? Considering that all the sites I've seen say 1955, I'm gonna assume so... Flipping Mackerel (talk) 16:18, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date 

message: I wonder if "Sehnsucht" is all that dominant a subject of this book, as it appears from this article.  The title, for one thing, clearly derives from Wordsworth, not directly from the German; which, incidentally, would more accurately be "desire," or "longing," as Lewis himself translates the word on page 7 or so: "they taught me longing - Sehnsucht..."(94.65.104.239 (talk) 17:54, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sehnsucht" 

message: This article is headed by a tag saying "This article's lead section may not summarize adequately the key points of its contents". I wonder whether this tag is still needed now. Vorbee (talk) 15:52, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Tag at the top
Talk:Suttree

message: There's a "Suttree Landing Park" in Knoxville, TN which is named after the protagonist of the book. (See here under "History of Park", though they misidentify Suttree as McCarthy's first novel): https://www.knoxvilletn.gov/government/city_departments_offices/parks_and_recreation/parks/suttree_landing_park)
There's also a large statue in the city called "The Oarsman" which has gained a reputation as being connected to the Cornelius Suttree character, but there's no reliable source which states this as far as I can tell. Anyway, I thought this might be some useful tidbits if this article is ever expanded out like the one on Blood Meridian. 101.98.134.21 (talk) 09:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suttree Landing Park
Talk:Symbols of Transformation

message: I've turned this redirect page into a brief discussion of the book, hopefully with "hooks" to let others expand it. It shows how the book fits into the series, briefly discusses its contents, and contains links to detailed online abstracts of every chapter, and to the book's entries in the catalogs of Princeton University Press and Routledge. In my experience, it isn't easy to find this material on one's own. I'm planning to do this with other books in the series, and would appreciate comments about that project. With luck, I might be able to do one book per day. Lou Sander (talk) 16:02, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer a redirect 

message: :The book contains material on directed thinking vs. associative thinking (dreaming), and extensive analysis of the fantasies of a Miss Frank Miller, including the symbols of the hero, mother, and sacrifice.
 Is directed thinking the older term for critical thinking? If so, I would like to link to it. Viriditas (talk) 02:27, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have much information about that. Basically I'm just passing along what the sources say, without a deep understanding of their specialized terminology. Maybe you could dig into the sources, or maybe into the book itself, and answer your question. I Googled 'directed thinking Jung', and found a lot of material. At first glance, it seems there is a connection between the two terms. Lou Sander (talk) 18:58, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Directed thinking
Talk:Bessie Blount Griffin

message: I've moved the section below to the Talk page since it is copy of this page.  She's an interesting person so I hope someone can rewrite and expand. Addere 03:13, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The photo uploaded for Blount-Griffin is identical to the photo uploaded for Marie Van Brittan Brown. It's unclear which of these (if either) is the correct photo, so I am removing it until this is resolved. --Blueclaw (talk) 22:16, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo inconsistency
Talk:Frak!

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:Acorn Electron Frak! screenshot.png, found on :Frak!, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 15:25, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted

message: This is original research, and has been contested off-wiki. It may possibly be true, but still needs to be verifiable (as is the case with other aspects of the article, too). -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 12:16, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electron polyphony 

message: Automata's Pimeval Man (starring their Pi-Man character) appears to be a clone of Frak! on the ZX Spectrum, though the graphics, sound, and gameplay are all somewhat inferior. 86.130.41.222 (talk) 04:11, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  A [[ZX Spectrum]] clone of Frak 

message: Pretty sure I didn't make this up, but I recall an 'adult' version of the game, where Trogg used his man member instead of a yoyo, the monsters were more vagina-like, and he would shout 'Fuck!' on dying instead of Frak!  I played it on a BBC Master, pretty sure it was called PerFrak.  Identical gameplay, so likely a humorous rip-off with some graphical resources changed.  Only played it once or twice as the game didn't really appeal to me in either form (I'm a Chuckie Egg man).
Anyone any references/memories?  Am I the only one?  Am I going nuts and making this up??  Posting here for completeness just in case anyone else has memories, or better still find the binaries!
82.23.43.244 (talk) 22:48, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perfrak - 'adult' version
Talk:Northkill Amish Settlement

message: Does anyone have a Hochstetler family book available to check the "Indian Attack" section for plagiarism?  I see to remember similar wording coming from Harvey Hostetler's account.  Unfortunately, I don't have my book with me right now.  Thanks,
DivusFilius 03:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Foreign exchange date conventions

message: Not sure if that's the right template. Anyway, title shouldn't be capitalised as is and the acronym FX is less widely known outside the financial world. Propose move to "Foreign exchange date conventions". 217.28.2.84 (talk) 04:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: . Martin 14:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: An additional good reference for the above is Chapter 1 of the book 'Foreign Exchange Option Pricing: A Practitioners Guide' (this chapter can be found here).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjmckp (talk • contribs) 03:20, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Tafsir al-Tha'labi

message: This does not seem to be a Wikepedia article as much as it is an advertisement for a book on Amazon france. There is little information about the Tafsir or its writer, and some of the links are to bookselling sites. It would be good to have a small article about this Quranic commentary, but this is not it. Energyworm (talk) 22:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of place? 

message: has some interpretation of this text. InverseHypercube (talk) 19:03, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible source
Talk:Han Xianchu

message: I see nothing wrong with what I wrote. first of all, Shang Jiang is the highest rank, not the 3rd highest. Check the shang jiang page for more details. secondly, whats wrong with "general of the chinese communist party"? also, Chinese Communist armed forces would be the People Liberation Army no? Hanfresco 03:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits made on January 26
Talk:Daredevil Dennis

message: I'm not sure if it was the Acorn Electron or the BBC (or both) but I do recall this game having 'loader music'. In particular a version of Haydn's "Serenade: Andante Cantabile" which can be listened to at Amazon , disc 2, track 10 for those who are interested. Perhaps also known as '[Quartet in G Major, Op. 3, No. 3, FHE No. 66 (spurious), Hoboken No. III:15]'.
:On a similar note (heh), the music in the meadow level is The Arrival Of The Queen Of Sheba from Solomon by George Frideric Handel. 84.129.175.234 (talk) 16:55, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loader Music
Talk:List of social science journals

message: I'm not sure about not listing in the Resources or researchers. --I think this should be a page separate from scientific journals, and that the category should be much developed. Just my view. DGG 03:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is an RfC regarding the standardization of journal lists names. Please comment at Talk:List of journals#RFC. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 01:39, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Talk:Lists of journals#RFC|RfC on journal list names]]
Talk:Taken by Storm

message: "Global warming ceased to be a subject of scientific debate years ago. Watch how critics jump straight to an examination of motives or credentials rather than the substance of an author’s argument whenever books like this one are published."
This is ridiculous on its face.  There's been a consensus among scientists for two decades.  Questing global warming is like questioning the holocaust or the existence of the moon.  While the author seems to wish people would repeat the vast knowledge that has been built up on the subject every time somebody questions an established fact out of ignorance.  Should we cast doubt on the universal theory of gravitation because "it has ceased to be a subject of scientific debate years ago?"
Asinine spam like this is exposing Wikipedia to ridicule:
Wikipedia is Run by George Bush Now?
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.22.219.128 (talk) 18:32, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idiocy Rules
Talk:Tales from Shakespeare

message: The Full text and images link takes me to an electronic book with illustrations not by Arthur Rackham, but by W. Paget. Does anyone know what's up with that? —MiguelMunoz (talk) 09:43, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The link is good. As the article says: written by Charles and Mary Lamb, but illustrated by Arthur Rackham. Johnuniq (talk) 09:48, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the link states like MiguelMunoz says. The article stated that it was illustrated by Arthur Rackham, but the Full text and images link (the first link listed) does NOT show this. It shows that the book was illustrated by Paget. I updated the Project Gutenberg link to a better one. That link DOES show it being illustrated by Rackham. Also, the ibiblio link shows it being illustrated by Rackham. I think it may be confusing to some for the article to state that it was illustrated by Rackham, but the first link provided gives someone else's name. I have updated the article to also reflect Paget as an illustrator. Thank you. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 14:33, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full Text and Images? 

message: In 3 versions I checked, Pericles is the last story, and Julius Caesar is not included. Can someone please confirm?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.237.253.79 (talk) 08:31, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. Thank you for catching that. It is fixed now. It was put in by an IP a while back and never corrected. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 14:07, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Julius Caesar not included
Talk:Snakehead (gang)

message: What is meant by "Its upmost rival" in this case?  Bruxism 03:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antecedent needed 

message: Shouldn't there be a section that says that the gang is referenced to in the book Snakehead by Anthony Horowitz? I would add it, but I'm not exactly sure of the fromatting for it. Powerfulmind Powerfultalk Powerfuledits 23:09, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Snakehead (novel)]] 

message: The article is extremely short and needs to be expanded.  But, I don't see any serious issues with grammar, punctuation, etc.  It's fine.--Levalley (talk) 19:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedited
Talk:Cotorro

message: What does "Cotorro had grown in such a way that it was exceeding in extension and population to the head of the municipality." mean ? -- Beardo 03:31, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Tanwir al-Miqbas

message: "This tafsir is considered unreliable for the most part; and, despite its popularity among the masses, it is totally rejected by Muslim scholars.[2]"
Your link leads to a brief publication by one Salafi Scholar which makes no mention of this tafsir.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.2.128.56 (talk) 22:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tanwir al-Miqbas is not mentioned in your source
Talk:Shugijutsu

message: ShugiJUTSU would be a part of jōdō? That strikes me rather odd, as the jutsu in shugijutsu implies that it is a traditional martial art (koryū) whereas the dō in jōdō tells us that it is modern (gendai). Kennin (talk) 12:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jutsu vs. D&#333;, the old story again. 

message: Kennin, I think I can say with very few chance of being wrong that your discussion about "jutsu" or "do" doesn't start from a good point.
If you really know martial arts, you probably heard about a famous author called Diane Skoss, who is considered to be quite serious when talking about Koryu.
If you look at the Koryu.com Website, you'll notice this sentence : "The terms are used interchangeably, with budo the most frequently heard. Bujutsu might possibly be used to distinquish an art with a stronger emphasis on combative technique from those that focus on life discipline (the "Way"), but in general, budo is the term used in Japan to refer to martial arts."
As a matter of fact, in Takeda Ryu Nakamura Ha, shugijutsu is considered to be part of jodo.
Carnops (talk) 12:53, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jutsu vs. Do
Talk:Teachings of Silvanus

message: This article gives the impression that it is a definite fact that the Teachings of Silvanus is not a Gnostic text. Well by that standard, the Gospel of Thomas is even less so (being so muted about cosmology). If you take the position that the recognition of a lower Demiurge as the one who did the creation, separate from the True God who did not create Cosmos, is the definite litmus test of Gnosticism, then Silvanus was not a Gnostic. But if you take the more big-tent position that affirms Clement and Origen were far nearer the category of Gnostic, and which indeed allows the Gospel of Thomas to be considered a Gnostic text, then Silvanus is definitely a Gnostic: almost everything else is clearly there. There were so many variations on the theme, and somewhere in between the totally full-blown and docetist Gnostics like Sethians and Naasenes (the sects that anyone but a deconstructionist would have no trouble assigning the category), and the orthodox on the other side, was the proto-monophysite Silvanus. 74.133.104.185 (talk) 03:07, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Not Gnostic"? 

message: The date given in the 2007 revised translation edited Marvin Meyer is "sometime in the late third century".Meyer, Marvin. editor. (2007). The Nag Hammadi Scriptures: the International Edition. NY:HarperOne. . pp.502-3. The last word on the matter is "the tractate contains very early material including traditions that could even go back to first-century Alexandrian Christianity" and cited in Birger A. Pearson's 2004 Gnosticsim and Christianity in Roman and Coptic Egypt pp.95-99. Church of the Rain (talk) 22:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Before Nicea
Talk:Tears of the Giraffe

message: Could someone with access to the UK reviews add them to this article? Writing from my perch at home, I rarely find the UK reviews of current British-authored novels on line, though short clips of these reviews are included at the sites where the book is sold. Maybe I would find the UK reviews if I worked from the public library, but I never seem to do my editing work there, alas. It would be good to have direct cites of the Booker prize consideration, a UK event, (now mentioned in Publication history from Kirkus Reviews comment) and to learn if any reviewer wrote in as much depth as the review published in the New York Times review of books.  --Prairieplant (talk) 06:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK reviews?
Talk:Redmond Prendiville

message: While Prendiville may have been significant to AC - this article does not mention how AC was significant to Prendiville. I am removing the template, but if the article is modified to show how his time at Aquinas College, Perth was significant then it would be easy to put back on.Garrie 03:48, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the template has no place here, IMO.  I'm removing it again.  —Moondyne 04:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Aquinas College, Perth template
Talk:Middle Fork River

message: Well, I had made a map for this river, only to find the page didn't exist. So here is a quick start. Pfly 03:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page created
Talk:Cárdenas, Cuba

message: Is it really relevant to list this as the home of Elian Gonzalez? At the very least the statement needs to be re-phrased to remove the "hostility" in my opinion. It comes off rather negatively between the two countries. - Inogenius 03:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Lam Suet

message: The text of this article was stolen from here and mangled: http://www.lovehkfilm.com/people/lam_suet.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 (talk) 20:39, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oops 
Talk:Social organism

message: I found this page while doing a 'could of' typo search, and it contains a gigantic amount of unsourced and typo-ridden text (see edit history). I've added a cleanup banner and hope someone with knowledge of the subject can turn this into a useful article. Then again, it might only be necessary to revert this edit, in which a user pasted 159,724 bytes into a 2,601 byte article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by FekketCantenel (talk • contribs) 15:38, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requires cleanup
Template talk:East Asia Summit (EAS)

message: I have altered the layout so that this template fits more comfortably at the bottom of articles. Matthew Collins, 20:21, Tuesday 20th February 2007.
East Timor is not a member, but may be a future member, and Russia was an observer in 2005 but not 2007.  Unless people cite sources for why they should remain I propose they should be deleted.  --202.4.78.29 01:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Jay Hammer

message: Hammer's character's name on The Guiding Light is the same as Jim Carrey's in Liar, Liar.  I would believe this to be a coincidence if the name was John Smith, but Fletcher Reade seems a little unlikely to come up by chance twice.  I think this should be researched.
::If that's the case, the GL character came first. 98.206.241.221 (talk) 18:22, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Paul Keaney

message: This is important in identifying his notability.Garrie 03:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: (Belatedly)—According to the relevant WP article, "There was one class: Companion. Both men and women were eligible, and recipients of this order are entitled to use the post-nominal letters 'ISO'". Bjenks (talk) 04:17, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What kind of [[Imperial Service Order|Iso]] was he?