lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Fifth Discipline

message: who is interested could still see it here. ----Erkan Yilmaz 23:15, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Restored.  There were questions about notability so I restored this and a previously-removed "global" reference as well.  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:33, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: remove [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Fifth_Discipline&action=historysubmit&diff=345523831&oldid=340462282 broken link]

message: An editor recently asked why this page doesn't violate WP:CSD#G11, which states that unambiguous advertising or promotion is not allowed on Wikipedia.  The implication was that this article does not belong in the project.
I checked Google Scholar and this book has over 3700 citations.  Even if those numbers are inflated by 100%, it's still over 1800 citations in Google Scholar, more than enough to put a heavy WP:BURDEN on anyone who claims the book does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BOOK.  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:37, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability is not an issue 

message: The comment at Talk:The_Fifth_Discipline/Comments would be more appropriate here on the talk page, rather than on the banner comments. Jonpatterns (talk) 16:42, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment should be move to talk page?
Template talk:Old XfD multi

message: Please change collapsible collapsed to mw-collapsible mw-collapsed, which is loaded faster and not deprecated. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 14:31, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: * Pppery * it has begun... 16:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 25 November 2021 

message: Please copy Module:Old XfD multi/sandbox to Module:Old XfD multi. The changes add support for a  parameter, which replaces the word deletion in the top line of the box. Danski454 (talk) 00:55, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: * Pppery * it has begun... 18:18, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 18 December 2021 

message: I believe that the template wiki link should be changed from "This template was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep." to "This template was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep." The phrase, 'nominated for deletion' refers closer to the process than simply 'deletion'. 'deletion' has ambiguity, because it could link to the XfD discussion or the actual process. This change wouldn't inhibit usability and would increase clarity. (See also MOS:LINKCLARITY, MOS:EASTEREGG) — Mcguy15 (talk, contribs) 12:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Added edit request template, unsure if this change would be controversial. If it is, please feel free to remove the edit request and discuss. — Mcguy15 (talk, contribs) 17:00, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

text: Happy Editing--IAmChaos 06:49, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I would expect a link saying "nominated for deletion" to lead me to a deletion discussion, not to Wikipedia:Deletion policy.  -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 07:33, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: . I'm with Tamzin here. If the link contained "nominated", I'd expect it to lead to the nomination, while I would expect just "deletion" to lead to a page on deletion in general. As such, I've declined the edit request. If you gain consensus for this change, you can open another one. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 01:30, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

text:  I don't personally have that implication, but I certainly agree with you, and I've realized the proposed version is not clear enough. I still think the original is unclear, though, since "deletion" could be the policy or the discussion, so I'd like to try to change it. Any better ideas? — Mcguy15 (talk, contribs) 03:10, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal 

message: I am not an expert on Lua, but I would like to request adding the words "multiple times." after "This <type of page> was nominated for 
deletion". Toadette (Let's discuss together!) 11:45, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems redundant and unnecessary to me. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add a little bit of something 

message: I've occasionally seen this put on articles rather than their talk pages. It could be worth it to use  to automatically put the page in  when that happens. jlwoodwa (talk) 18:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use Category:Pages with templates in the wrong namespace
Talk:The Life of the Party

message: * Life of the Party (1920 film) mentioned in List of United States comedy films
* Life of the Party (1937 film) mentioned in 1937 in music and List of musical films by year
Uiew 16:52, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly also 
Talk:Fenton, Michigan

message: Fenton is the fastest growing city of 25,000 or less where?  In the county, in the state, in the US, in North America, on the planet?  Where?--Hokeman (talk) 13:19, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fastest growing city of 25,000 or less 
Talk:List of animators

message: Is there a logic to this ordering of names?
Some in the "past" section are still alive, but are proably not working. Viva-Verdi 16:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ???? Viva-Verdi 16:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  And WHO are the 3 Chungs named here?? 

message: I have created 3 sub sections: (i) Animators no longer living; (ii) Living animators; (iii) Other famous names in the world of animation (not animators).
This seems to be a logical breakdown, as the previous catergories had people in BOTH and some who were dead in the other section....
Viva-Verdi 22:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subtitles re-arranged more logically
Talk:Descent with modification

message: I think it makes most sense for this page to redirect to Evolution.
As i understand it, Darwin used the term "theory of descent with modification" as we commonly use the term "theory of evolution." (see, for example, http://www.visionlearning.com/library/module_viewer2.php?mid=112&l=&let1=Bio)
The term doesn't seem like it needs a whole article, but i think Evolution is the more accurate redirect.
-- baxrob 16:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scouting/Userboxes/Australia/Queen's Scout

message: :Image:AUSQueensScoutBadge.svg was been determined to be a derivative of the original image, thus non-free and has been replaced by a free image.  Further discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scouting.  --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  10:22, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Link/cut tree

message: This article would need someone who knows more about link/cut trees, since I only use (and described)  the most basic operations that can be done on the tree. Prefered link functionnality was omitted because I don't know how they work. Martlau 16:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

message: A lot of other data structures has demonstration applets. What about Link-cut trees? Tried a google search and it returned mostly "splay tree applet" and "link cut tree papers" on the same page. --I'm BNJ. BNJ Not Jam! (talk) 01:44, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for adding demonstration applets 

message: The following diagram uses P and d which are not mentioned in the text.  That makes the explanation/diagram fairly useless.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link/cut_tree#/media/File:LinkCutAccess1.png  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.228.199.74 (talk) 08:32, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The diagrams do not correspond to the text 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link/cut_tree#/media/File:Linkcuttree1.png
In the third tree, l should be connected to f, not c. --Kuratowski (talk | contribs) 12:12, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is an error on the figure
Talk:Hyles euphorbiae

message: Where are these found?  The Jade Knight (talk) 07:31, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Range? 

message: With reference to Spurge Hawkmoths, the article says:
"the white and red spots appear as the caterpillar increases in size, and in a few weeks it becomes a most beautiful object, and so conspicuous as to attract the sea-gulls and terns, which devour them in numbers"
I find it most unlikely that the caterpillars are devoured by birds. Spurge plants have a toxic sap, and it is far more likely that the Hawkmoth larvae are brightly coloured in order to advertise that they too are poisonous (having redeployed the toxins from consumed Spurge leaves).  I have actually watched a Spurge Hawkmoth larva drink the white, toxic sap oozing from a broken Spurge stem.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.144.192.137 (talk) 12:45, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edibility of Spurge Hawk Larvae
Talk:Sign-on

message: I came here in response to the copyedit tag, but find that this article has totally lost it's purpose. This should just be telling us about what sign-on is, not listing a billion and one examples of it. Given that it nearly entirely violates WP:NOR and tends to be WP:UNENC, as well as much of it being poorly written and frankly tedious, I would say 90% of it needs to be summarised then deleted. I'm sure someone started in good faith long ago adding a couple of examples, and I'm sure the later additions have also been in good faith, but these examples have now swelled to compose basically the entire article. At best this info should be put in a list called something like "List of sign-on procedures", but I'm not convinced we need that either. If you want to discuss, please do so below, otherwise I'm probably going to go through in the next day or so with a very big broom. --jjron (talk) 06:11, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Huge clean-up done. Just a reminder here not to re-add all this trivia. If you're even vaguely considering it, then it needs to be referenced per WP:VERIFIABILITY. I will also leave a hidden internal note at the top of the article. --jjron (talk) 10:44, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is really excellent now and just about perfect (except for the hard-to-fill request for some source, so one can get rid of that box at the top), as well as useful and efficient. After you go through all the work to get "sign-off" in the same shape, Wikipedia will have a really nice complementary pair of articles. Regards, Remotelysensed (talk) 09:22, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article scope - major cleanout
Category talk:WikiProject Miami

message: Should these be a part of the WikiProject?  For example, Miami sporting teams major events that occurred outside of Miami (Super Bowls, college bowl games, college world series).  Or how about Miami officials involved in Washington scandals, controversies, or annual events in some other location, should those events become part of the Miami project?  I am curious, because I saw some links to Miami super bowls from Dallas and California and Georgia, even though the event was in Florida.  is there a WP:Rule on this that I do not know?
CodeCarpenter 16:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Events by Miami members outside of Miami?
Talk:50th Troop Carrier Wing

message: Okay, so this page was just created, and you're off to a nice start. Presumably you're intending to come back within the next few hours or days to flesh it out. Nevertheless, as it stands at this moment when I happen to have dropped in to assess it, it is lacking an introduction, references, and a number of other sections, though I like those section-expand templates which help dramatically to show the reader where things are omitted. Thanks for a promising start, and assuming you come back to finish the job, thanks for that. LordAmeth 20:41, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WPMILHIST Assessment

message: Although WP:MILMOS#UNITNAME generally calls for a unit page to be the last name by which a unit was known, it appears in this case "the subject is clearly more commonly known by one of the previous names."  The unit was never active under the division designation.  I proposed moving the article to 50th Troop Carrier Wing.  I'll wait a week or so to see if there are any comments on the move.  --Lineagegeek (talk) 14:21, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There seems to be no objection.  It'll be moved --Lineagegeek (talk) 16:38, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible move
Talk:St. Anthony Village High School

message: I'm not sure what the process is exactly for getting high school logos, but if possible and someone more familiar with the copyright rules could get that, it would be a help. matt91486 16:54, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As I said, the information didn't need to be replaced entirely, just augmented.  That said, the Minnehaha rivalry is a very short term development, and has a certain extenuating factor that may not have the rivalry extend beyond the past season.  But I'll include it as a third rivalry; I would think the historical basis of the rivalry with Columbia Heights hardly needs to be removed from the article. matt91486 (talk) 02:31, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Kolbein Falkeid

message: Perhaps someone could use http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolbein_Falkeid as a reference... Madlobster 16:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Emirp

message: 11 is not an Emirp because it is a palindromic prime, I removed it from that sentence:
The sequence of emirps begins 11, 13, 17, 31, 37, 71, 73, 79, 97, 107, 113, 149, 157... (sequence A006567 in OEIS).
Kaluppollo (talk) 17:56, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for spotting and fixing that. An IP added the false 11 a month ago in the preceding edit . You don't have to post to the talk page when you correct simple errors like that. You can just make an informative edit summary when you correct it. PrimeHunter (talk) 20:00, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in the list 

message: I guess the sentence: All multi-digit, non-repunit permutable primes are emirps. should be read as: All multi-digit, non-repunit and non-palindromic permutable primes are emirps, since for example permutable primes, 131, 373, are not repunits and are palindromic primes, and therefore are not emirps. --xJaM (talk) 01:22, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. But single-digit and repunit numbers are palindromic so we only need All non-palindromic permutable primes are emirps. I have changed it to this. PrimeHunter (talk) 01:52, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subset 

message: I took the liberty of simply adding this word to the stub article here as a subject warranting mention at least, for now.Julzes (talk) 22:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added definition of 'emirpimes' 

message: Is emirpimes in the article a typo and is it supposed to read emirprimes or am I just missing something? -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 13:03, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: emirpimes is correct. It's semiprime spelled backwards, just like emirp is prime spelled backwards. See for example http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Emirpimes.html. PrimeHunter (talk) 16:47, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense. Thanks. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 17:24, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo 

message: Is there a particular reason for listing the emirps in base 12? Is there anything particularly enlightening about this representation. I'm not sure it adds anything useful unless there is some added commentary below. Gossipm (talk) 04:53, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Base 12
Talk:Two Medicine Formation

message: What is the origin of that name? Sounds Native American to me, but why anyone would call some place "Two Medicine" is beyond my imagination and seems to have a nice lil story attached. Dysmorodrepanis 17:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: Lots of cutesy drawings of dinosaurs, but not enough on the geology. Adding a geologic cross section and/or geologic map would make this a much better article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.208.69.46 (talk) 05:31, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's a formation, so how about something on the GEOLOGY? 

message: This is one of two instances that I have found in WP. The phrase appears in the box "Aproximate paleocoordinates" (= APPROXIMATE ....) but there is no text in the edit that enables it to be changed. Can you direct this to someone that has the know how.66.74.176.59 (talk) 17:49, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: In the "rock unit" infobox, there is a parameter "paleocoordinates," which controls the paleocoordinates in the infobox. Primefac (talk) 18:50, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This is fine and dandy but you might as well be speaking Martian to me as I know absolutely nothing about that and do not know where to find it if I did.66.74.176.59 (talk) 18:54, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: If you click on "edit" at the top of the page, at the top of the editing area that appears you will see a line that says "{{Infobox rockunit". That marks the start of the infobox, which appears at the top right hand corner of the article. Below that heading, you will see a number of entries for the particular entries in that box, starting with "| name    = Two Medicine Formation", then "image    = Two Medicine.jpg", and so on. Somewhere down the list you will see a line beginning "| paleocoordinates    = ". The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:03, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sp. "Aproximate paleocoordinates" in box
Talk:Outpost Firewall Pro

message: Why does the search "outpost" go to a shareware vanity/ad page?209.216.178.74 12:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know about this software, but you're right that it reads like an ad. However instead of blanking it you can either add a  to mark that the article has wrong tone, or even file a deletion request. andy 12:54, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

message: This article has a lot of broken citations seeing as the forums are deleted and not archived, as well as the Agnitum website too. If anyone can help contribute a fix that would be appreciated.
There may also be other info in the Russian Language version of this page.
C0n0r97 (talk) 03:35, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix broken Citations
Talk:Warrington Transporter Bridge

message: #The article needs to be expanded.
#It should make use of sections.
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
Peter I. Vardy 13:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report
Talk:Kenny Young

message: This page needs a disambiguation:
Kenny Young (Songwriter)
Kenny Young (Ufologist, Videographer)
SeanFromIT 17:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article needs help! Obviously written by an enthusiastic fan, it needs to be more neutral in voice, and the writing needs attention. Many sentence fragments and badly worded phrases. I took a stab at it, but there's more to be done.Malco23 (talk) 20:58, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: Any chance the songwriter that you're referring to is the Brooklyn-based lead singer of the alternative comedy folk group known as "The Eggplants?" ---------User:DanTD (talk)  21:05, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:48, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Eggplants
Talk:Randal Marlin

message: Mr. Randal is an active in civil liberties and this seems missing in this article. Can we add something about his involvement in local civil liberties associations?
Pete (talk) 08:07, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Political Activism
Talk:Teresa Taylor

message: She was listed as having appeared in "Fast Times at Ridgemont High" in her filmography, but I was unable to find a source for that anywhere. IMDB and Letterboxd both fail to list her as an actor in that movie, and there were no results on a Google search. I pulled it out for now, but if someone's got a source, feel free to put it back in! Warhorus (talk) 21:07, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fast Times at Ridgemont High
Talk:John Dickerson (journalist)

message: It appears the subject of the article is editing the article, in violation of Wiki policy. I reverted to the last version prior to the self-edits. 64.0.88.181 17:11, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent! That rule against self-editing is vexing, I know, particularly when there are errors of fact. And it's not a rule universally known, either. You are forgiven the misunderstanding. Sandover 06:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: COI
Category talk:Political organizations based in the United States

message: I checked and exactly none of the following groups exist:
 Category:Progressive organizations in the United States 
 Category:Liberal organizations in the United States
 Category:Centrist organizations in the United States
 Category:leftist organizations in the United States
 Category:Communist organizations in the United States
 Category:socialist organizations in the United States
 Category:radical organizations in the United States
 Category:biased organizations in the United States
 
Clearly, Wikipedia belongs in the last category.  
We can either delete this current category, or we can start the debates about what organizations are socialist, leftist, radical and biased.
So why do we have this group?  Candidate for speedy deletion.--Altoids Man (talk) 01:10, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: --Hjal (talk) 08:12, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Why do we need this group -- candidate for deletion
Talk:John Studebaker

message: John Studebaker, one of the founders of the Studebaker Corporation resided in Ashland, Ohio during 1835-1850. John lived here with his mother, father, and his five siblings. 
When John was 19 years old he built his own custom wagon and traveled to California to mine for gold. Upon arriving in California, John was offered a job there as a wagon maker, but turned down that job for mining. His first job was building wheelbarrows for the miners at a cost of ten dollars each. John managed to save 8,000 dollars selling wheelbarrows and invested that money into his first company, which built carriages. Studebakers company was the worlds largest producers of horse drawn vehicles. President Lincoln was riding in a Studebaker carriage the night he was assassinated. General Grant, also owned a Studebaker carriage. 		
	 In 1904 Studebaker began building gasoline-propelled automobiles, in the next seven years they sold more than 2,481 passenger cars and trucks. The Studebaker Corporation operated seven plants. One of his plants was located on U.S. 250 in Ashland, Ohio. In 1954 Studebaker merged with Packard and was unable to withstand his competitors competition. Even though the Studebaker plant is no longer on U.S. 250, a bronze plaque can be found there. The plaque can be found three and a half miles east of the Ashland City limits on U.S. 250.
   
Cdowiatt (talk) 22:47, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Studebaker (Ashland, Ohio)