Talk:Tourism in Sydney

message: I think this article needs a major clean up, it is full of unsourced statements ect. Some ideas I have to improve it:
*Pictures-First of all, the picture of the Sydney Opera House is always used in article about Sydney Tourism, maybe if someone could find a picture with lot's of tourists in Sydney areas or landmarks.
*Information-Most of the information has unsourced statements, also it is written to well.
That's all I can think of for now, but if anyone else has any other suggestions do add them on this page. Jackp 06:01, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs to be cleaned up!! 

message: I added the 'expand' tag because the amount of information is fairly scarce. Maybe if more information on shopping districts, cafes, malls and so on can be added, and some more descriptive pictures of tourism in the city (such as tourists around a popular city attraction), than the Sydney Opera House, because it is very obvious that the Opera House is a hot spot for tourism.
: Hi Jackp. Tag removed as are all your efforts. --Merbabu 12:05, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion tag 

message: How can the Hunter Valley be included an article for Tourism in Sydney??? The Hunter Valley is hundreds of kilometers away. Next we'll have Uluru!
I'm removing the entire section - I will dump it on a user sub-page pending Tourism in Newcastle, Australia.
Garrie 21:57, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The text (and pic) is now at User:GarrieIrons/Tourism in the Hunter Valley. Really, it needs it's own article, Tourism in the Hunter Valley or Tourism in Newcastle, Australia.Garrie 22:03, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note, nothing in the section wasn't already said at Hunter Valley.Garrie 22:03, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hunter Valley 

message: Does anyone else think this is, or is written as, an advertisement?
I don't edit much, so I probably wouldn't make the best change.
No, it looks OK. The section describes what is on offer, not that it is a 'must see' or an 'amazing experience' or anything like that. Description of the process isnt necessarily advertising. Mdw0 (talk) 01:07, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  BridgeClimb 

message: The article's opening sentence indicates that 22.6 million Australians visited Sydney in 2009, but Australia's entire population is only 22.4 million. Something doesn't add up...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.8.220.116 (talk) 16:48, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Domestic Visitors to Sydney? 

message: The Parramatta section is more a cheerleader for the area rather than outlining anything significant for tourists. So it has a business centre, a mall, a rugby league team and a soccer team - how is this more significant than other suburbs of Sydney? We are certainly not talking loads of international tourists coming to see Parramatta, or even domestic. Certainly the size of this section is unwarranted, but also its existance at all in the article.Mdw0 (talk) 00:17, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Parramatta is not significant

message: This article is all wrong.  We aren't a tourist guide.  This is supposed to be about the subject of tourism in Sydney.  Instead it is a list.  It not supposed to be a tourist guide for Sydney. Its the same as having a list of Australia's most popular car models for Road transport in Australia. - Shiftchange (talk) 02:06, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  All wrong