lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Political positions of Dennis Kucinich

message: I don't know much about him and have not attempted to provide full citations, but the grammar in the previous version of this article needed quite a bit of help. Changes have been primarily cosmetic and hopefully will not prove controversial. Grundyc 07:50, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Seems like his friend Ron Paul would be right there with him. I'd check up on that... --Kudzu1 07:06, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only Congressman to vote against Iraq War and all funding bills? 

message: Should his stance on gay marriage be mentioned, as it is for the other candidates?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.185.208.14 (talk) 00:29, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gay marriage? 

message: I expect he probably voted against the Afghanistan war too, but does anyone know for sure? Richard75 (talk) 16:34, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Afghanistan 

message: No consensus it's reliable so it can't be used in a BLP.
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_58#Venezuelanalysis_Reboot
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_197#Venezuelananalysis
2A02:4780:BAD:23:FCED:1FF:FE23:351 (talk) 20:51, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  venezuelananalysis.com content removed
Talk:Taney Arrest Warrant

message: I didn't add this template because I think the article is written badly or misrepresents the facts, but to give readers a warning that this topic is the subject of much conjecture and uncertainty. If there's a better template to put that idea across, I would encourage someone to use it instead of "Disputed." Docmcconl (talk) 00:33, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why don't you just add some sourced text describing the dispute?  ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 00:40, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Since you don't actually dispute any of the facts in the article, I don't think the Disputed template is appropriate.  That the reality of the warrant is controversial is clearly stated in the article.  Therefore I propose removing the Disputed template, and will do so unless there is objection. Tms (talk) 21:08, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Disputed" Template 

message: The article has been noted as unsourced since 2007 and it is almost 2011. 
This article hasn't sufficient reliable sources that an average person can check and fails WP:VERIFY and [[[WP:RS]]. --Javaweb (talk) 23:17, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I added two recent scholarly books from 2008 and 2009 that cover the case, and also deleted un-sourced material that is not referenced by any popular or scholarly source. Rjensen (talk) 01:18, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed  deletion because of lack of verifiability 

message: With the new sources I just added I think theee is little doubt that this is a well sourced claim even a probable one now that we have 3 sources Kalmenb (talk) 05:22, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New sources
Talk:XXII Corps (Union Army)

message: My Formatting for parts of this article is temporary (mainly for "Components" listing).  This is mainly to get all the information in and still be able to read it for editing/writing purposes.  This will be fixed in the final. Leobold1 (talk) 19:19, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Formatting
Talk:Peace Conference of 1861

message: The Republicans were willing to guarantee slavery within the existing states in a strong manner, and fudge things in the then-existing territories in a manner which would ensure that the great majority of the land area (which was completely unsuited to plantation slavery or cotton-growing) would remain free, but while preserving Southern face to some degree (maybe giving New Mexico and Arizona to the south) -- but as with the Crittendon Compromise, they were absolutely opposed with unyielding determination to allowing any expansion of slavery in territories to be acquired in future by the United States.  The question of future U.S. territories was the one where no compromise of any kind was possible. AnonMoos (talk) 02:29, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The description of Lincoln's opposition is still misleading... AnonMoos (talk) 12:42, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: crucial sticking point for the Republicans
Talk:Militia Act of 1862

message: I think the information provided here is valuable, but I was trying to find what the actual draft stipulations were. I came here from this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrollment_Act which stated that it replaced this on draft policy, such as the ages for draft were between 20 and 45. This entire article seems to only focus on the admission of black soldiers. What were the ages? How were draftees chosen?  J1DW (talk) 03:54, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Is there anything else?

message: I've wikified this article some, but it could use a little more work in these areas:
*References marked "Phone" and "Class" are probably original research and should be removed or replaced
*Illustrations and photographs could be added
*Sections could be tweaked a bit
*The essay-like language could be revised
*The lead could be expanded to summarize the article
Following these changes, the article will most likely be B-class and close to GA. Gobōnobo + c 16:57, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: To do
Talk:Fort Reynolds (Virginia)

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 2600:1004:B06E:19A7:F4F7:1732:5952:6E0D (talk) 15:50, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Alexandria Canal (Virginia)

message: Article says "...granted a charter to the Alexandria Canal Company in 1830. ... Construction began soon afterwards on the Aqueduct Bridge" but the next paragraph says "Construction of the bridge and of the Alexandria Canal began in 1833." 1833 is *not* soon after 1830 except in a very sloppy way. In any case, it's redundant to say "construction began" twice. The reference is clear that construction began in 1833 so I'm removing the earlier sloppiness. Also, removed the "unloading" comment - there is nothing in the reference to back that up. The hardship as I interpret is the lack of riverlocks which only became available in 1845, 2 years after the Aqueduct Bridge was completed. Donlibes (talk) 19:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems
Talk:District of Columbia Home Rule Act

message: Shouldn't this articled be merged with District_of_Columbia_home_rule? --IvanStepaniuk (talk) 23:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I would support this. Right now, it seems almost all the information is duplicated in that article, and it flows smoothly. I'll put the merge notice up, and if there's no objection within a week (per WP:MERGE guidelines) I'll redirect. MarginalCost (talk) 03:50, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

text: I would not support this move right now. While the information is mostly duplicated in this article, major laws and Acts of Congress are considered to be notable enough to warrant their own articles. Even though the article on the Act itself is relatively small, that doesn't mean that more information could not be added about the legislative history in the run-up to passage, how the bill was passed, alternate amendments to the bill that ultimately did not make it, etc. Basically, if a Wikipedia entry is not as detailed as we like, it should be researched and fleshed out to make it more substantial; not just dumped into another article. Best, epicAdam(talk) 12:06, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging with [[District of Columbia Home Rule]]
Talk:Freedom Plaza

message: I believe this plaza might be just outside the boundaries of Federal Triangle (at least according to Google Maps, which I admit is not 100% accurate re: neighborhood boundaries). Are you sure the category for Federal Triangle applies? ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:36, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Since you removed this entry from :Template:Federal Triangle, shall we remove :Category:Federal Triangle from this entry, too? ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Federal Triangle?
Talk:Holy Rood Cemetery

message: I removed the proposed deletion template.  To residents of the District of Columbia, Holy Rood is something of a local curiosity - that is, if you should happen by it.  It's a plot of isolated, undeveloped and largely untended land in the middle of a concrete commercial corridor, and it is hard not to wonder about its history.  A Wikipedia entry is useful for anyone who wants to know a bit more about it.  Doubtlessly Wikipedia is full of things that are 'notable' primarily to a small subset of the users, but which articles are still valuable.  JohnInDC 20:42, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The address for the cemetary may not be 2016 Wisconsin Avenue NW, instead it may be 2128 or 2126 Wisconsin Avenue NW.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.82.144.3 (talk) 13:08, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I see that.  I can't find anything definitive right now so for the time being I'll just put them both in.  Thanks.  JohnInDC (talk) 13:48, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Address
Talk:National World War I Memorial (Washington, D.C.)

message: --98.116.115.220 (talk) 13:29, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: creation date?

message: The PBS Newshour just posted this video of the opening ceremony for this memorial, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-ceremony-heralds-opening-of-wwi-memorial-in-washington-d-c  — Lentower (talk) 13:07, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed - memorial has been opened 

message: Since you removed this entry from :Template:Federal Triangle, shall we remove :Category:Federal Triangle, too? ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Federal Triangle
Talk:Brentwood (Washington, D.C.)

message: The article would be improved by focusing on the neighborhood and its development rather than so much on a few people.  There seems to be too much about the early social lives of illustrious residents and court cases about land development, for an article about a neighborhood.--Parkwells (talk) 19:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Brookland (Washington, D.C.)

message: Including the Monroe Street Market in this article seems questionable if the western border of Brookland is indeed 9th Street NE. Monroe Street Market is to the west of 9th Street.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rockettemorton (talk • contribs) 20:33, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monroe Street Market
Talk:Ivy City

message: The current text mentions a B&O roundhouse in Ivy City, but no year or reference is cited:
:As part of the construction, the railroad company built its last roundhouse (the current Amtrak yard) one mile outside the city limit.
I've found no documents showing that there was a B&O roundhouse before 1890. The company built a roundhouse around 1890 in the Trinidad neighborhood, east of Ivy City. (See Herbert Harwood, Jr., Impossible Challenge, 1979.) The B&O used this facility until a new roundhouse was built in Ivy City around 1908, for joint use by the B&O and the Pennsylvania Railroad. There was also a B&O freight yard at Eckington--but not a roundhouse--starting in 1889. Caseyjonz (talk) 07:34, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: B&O Roundhouse

message: Both external links yield a 404. IE dead links.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonnycando (talk • contribs) 02:37, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Caseyjonz (talk) 03:40, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead external links
Talk:Near Northeast (Washington, D.C.)

message: I just corrected the sentence saying that Pierre L'Enfant named Near Northeast as "Old City #1".  It's only referred to as the Old City #1 because it was included in old L'Enfant's plan.  There was no city for L'Enfant to label as "old".  --Blahblah29 (talk) 13:47, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Anachronistic name

message: Nobody can get the nomenclature of this particular entry right. Here is how it works:
· Residents of the area talking to other bona fide District taxpayers say they live in "Near Northeast"
· Residents of the area talking to outsiders who have some understanding of the District say they live in "Northeast"
· Residents of the area talking to outsiders who have no understanding of the District but have heard of the gentrification say they "live off H Street"
· Realtors, developers, and others with financial interest in the area but no personal interest will call it "Capitol Hill North", "The Atlas District", or "NoMa" (despite NoMa being on the other side of what was Delaware Avenue).
· On paper (including L'Enfant's various documents and recorded deeds) the area is considered "Old City".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.32.107.150 (talk) 20:11, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I revised several portions of the article to alleviate frustration. The neighborhood has taken on a variety of terms, some used for marketing and others for distinction. It will be interesting to see, in 20-30 years, which name remains.--Ge0rgetown (talk) 18:57, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: the map is identical to atlas district, (and i heard a suggestion of H Street district) merge and redirect? is Atlas district a better name? maybe the consensus here will prevail in 20 years? Slowking4⇔ †@1₭ 19:37, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Damnit
Talk:Kadee

message: Unfortunately the information on this site is NOT as accurate as it should be:
Kadee Metal Products was founded by indentical twin brothers Keith and Dale Edwards (KADEE) was named in the early 1940's using their initials, as they begun to make turn-outs, but was suspended as they entered the Air Corp and subsequently exited a few years later to pursue their business.  In 1947 the Kadee boys created what would be the beginning of a revolution in the model railroad industry by creating a fully functioning metal knuckle coupler that looked and worked like the real ones on the trains.  Keith and Dale built a small business that helped change the industry in a way that modelers could now mimic the breaking of trains with the magne-matic® knuckle couplers after moving the company to Medford, OR in 1955.
After many years of growth, the two decided that it would be best to "Split" the company and Kadee would take the coupler portion from HO scale and larger and Micro-Trains (the N scale rolling stock they made) would be Keith's along with products N scale and smaller.
In 1990 Kadee Quality Products built a new building and relocated in White City, OR and Micro-Trains did so in Talent, OR.
Dale Edwards is still an intrical part of Kadee and is the Chairman of the Board and at age 93 was proceeded in death by the passing of Keith on July 26, 2012 and his wife Grace Edwards several years earlier.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.116.47.238 (talk) 18:02, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Lightning Crusader

message: Why the ?@*! is this article named "Lightning Crusader" when the screenshot+box illustration and all the body text refer to "Light Crusader" (which also has a separate article) and there appears no other mention of any other name; is it in fact just a typo and a duplicate article? Maybe its content should be merged or whatever with the other article (rather than just deleted), and/or there should be an explanation for why "Lightning" rather than "Light". --195.92.168.164 08:34, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Joe Engel

message: Posted photo shows right-handed pitcher; B-Ref and Retrosheet list Engel as a southpaw.  Is photo of someone else?McGill1974 (talk) 00:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Talk:Beretta BM 59

message: Did the BM59 use a long-stroke gas piston like the original M1 Garand, or a short-stroke gas piston like the related M-14?Axeman (talk) 08:01, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short- or Long-Stroke Gas Piston 
Talk:Parc and Dare Hall

message: I think we need some published references here to keep this page alive. I am unsure about the actual build dates. The dates move between 1892 and 1895, these could reflect the initial decision to build and actual completion dates. We need clarification. 
Also as much as I would love to think of the socialist men of the valleys with pipes in hand discussing Marxism and "All them cornfields and ballet in the evening", I find it doubtful. It was more than likely somewhere to go to avoid the wife for a few hours. I have only seen one website that states this claim, and it is unsourced. I am a Rhondda boy and it doesn't sit well with me. --FruitMonkey 08:52, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After much research I withdraw my initital statement. The miners did actually sit around with pipes discussing Marxism. Though it still needs a proper reference from a notable source. FruitMonkey (talk) 16:29, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Raul Fernandez (entrepreneur)

message: I stumbled upon Raul Fernandez (entrepreneur) because of its maintenance tag. When I started researching I found that the article very closely remembles this web site. It appears most of the information was added by a single user on December 5, 2017, who has edited no other articles. Recent revisions of this article may need to be hidden, or substantially rewritten. Flibirigit (talk) 01:38, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio concerns
Talk:University of Melbourne Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences

message: 110.32.16.240 (talk) 07:40, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ---- hello my son azaiah was diagnosed with a 3/3 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor in oct 2010 he is now 19 months old. we need information and this uni was recomended
Talk:Caroline Divines

message: As well as adding a paragraph on liturgy & aesthetics, I have done some reorganising. The section titles "Saints and heros [sic]" and "Learned in theology" seemed a little odd and hagiographic, so I have renamed them more prosaically. The lead prargraph of the first section has been incoroporated into the lead paragraph of the second, where it seems more appropriate.--Iacobus (talk) 00:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some reorganisation
Talk:Salomon Koninck

message: Hello User:Neddyseagoon you are copying my articles from the Dutch Wikipedia, without checking its content, including the mistakes. Taksen
:Well, translating the Dutch page for an English language version on a Dutch artist seems logical enough, and has precedent.  Rather than merely complaining, could you perhaps run through them (here's my contributions list) and double check them for mistakes?  Your translation skills will be ten times better than mine, I'm sure. :-) Neddyseagoon - talk 13:53, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:5th Air and Air Defence Forces Army

message: *Air base, Кольцово, In 1989 on the basis of 142 осаэ it is formed 390 осап. On arms - planes An-12, Ту-134, Ан-24, Ан-26 and helicopters Mi-6, Ми-8. In December, 1997 on the basis of the shelf is created осаэ. In May, 1998 in connection with association of the Air Forces and Armies of air defence the squadron enters structure 5 ВА, having merged with 180 отаэ (which it was deployed in air station Aramil). In the end 2003 75 осаэ it has been reformed in aviation base.
*Air base, Edging
*Air base, Troitsk, Search and rescue - it is generated 30/12/2003 year from 199 овэ, 316 овэ and 73 separate mouths аэродромно-technical обеспечения- Ми-8/2
*Air base, Упрун, Search and rescue - it is generated in December, 2003 on the basis of 320 отаэ (up to 1998 г-195 отап in Kustanai), separate mouths of аэродромно-technical maintenance and communication(connection) separate mouths and radio engineering обеспечения- Ан--12/2
*511 зрп, Engels, Saratov, Гв. Smolensk Краснознаменный Suvorov's awards, three times Kutuzov, Богдана Khmelnitskiy
*зрп, Berezovsky, Гв.- Up to 1997 57 зрбр
*зрп, Samara, Up to 1993 134 Красн. зрбр	
*44 ртбр, Peace, Samara, In March, 1993 rearrangement of management of 44-th radio engineering brigade of air defence in management of 31-st radio engineering a shelf begins, but in 1998 on its(his) base management of a radio engineering brigade again is formed.
*51 ртп, Chelyabinsk
*пкп, Чебеньки, Search command пункт- a management(manual) поисково-эвакуационными works on piloted and pilotless space vehicles
*пкп, Упрун, Management(Manual) поисково-эвакуационными works on piloted and pilotless space vehicles
*ак, Karaganda, Rear maintenance поисково-эвакуационных works
*ак, Range, Maintenance 
*аб Кольцово
*брс, Чебеньки, Base of a reserve самолетов- up to 1992 904 уап
*оипр, Engels, Separate engineering-item a mouth-быв.1147 оисбат
*ис, Wide Small river, Engineering warehouse
*обат, Engels, Separate battalion
*оиабат, Engels, Separate engineering air field battalion
*The expert, Mari АССР, Warehouse of aviation arms and ammunition
*бхвт рхбзSterlitamak
*брхв, Ekaterinburg, Base of repair and storage of arms
*бсхв, Novouralsk, Base of supply and storage of arms
*бхввт, N.Sergi, Base of storage of arms and military technics(technical equipment)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Buckshot06 (talk • contribs) 10:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: MOSCOW. July 10 [2007](Interfax-AVN) - Lieutenant General Mikhail Kucheryavy is to take up his post as the new commander of the Urals Air Force and Air Defense Forces Army during a visit by Air Force Commander-in-Chief Colonel General Alexander Zelin on July 10-12.
Zelin will inspect units, participating in an integrated tactical exercise.
The former commander of the Urals Air Force and Air Defense Forces Army, Lieutenant General Vadim Volkovitsky, was promoted to the post of Deputy Air Force Commander-in-Chief for Air Defense. Buckshot06 (talk) 02:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kucheryavy takes up post as Urals Air Force, Air Defense Army commander
Talk:Religion in Malaysia

message: Islam is the official religion in Malaysia, if you are a Muslim living in Malaysia, you have to follow Islamic law as well. There have been wild interpretations in regards to whether Malaysia is a secular state from politicians. Citations do not really help since many of the authors are foreign sources. Malaysia is an Islamic state, it is proved by the existence of the State Syariah Court in Malaysia. Badpuccini (talk) 07:36, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The nationality of an author does not impact on their reliability, but for what it's worth one source is from the Malaysian Bar. As for theory vs reality, there is an entire section which discusses the contradictions you mention. CMD (talk) 09:30, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malaysia is not a secular state
Talk:Wonderland (1999 film)

message: I'm pretty sure the soundtrack came out in May.  I know I bought it the day it came out in the U.S., and I don't think it was September, but I can't say for sure.  I bought Ravenous the day it came out, and it doesn't seem like there was that long a wait for Wonderland. I remember mentioning waiting for it to come out to my mom after the release date was announced.  I'm going by Amazon, which isn't always accuarate on these things.--Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 17:44, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Soundtrack

message: . Fences&Windows 17:49, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources