lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Four Noes and One Without

message: This sentence sounds little strange: The "four noes" are that provided the People's Republic of China does not attack Taiwan, the his administration would not: . I mean the structure. --FallingInLoveWithPitoc 17:06, 24 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I've paraphrased it a little. --Menchi 23:35, 24 Oct 2003 (UTC)

message: The "four noes" are that provided the People's Republic of China does not attack Taiwan, the his administration would not: . I mean the structure.
''
was rectified to
Provided that the People's Republic of China has no intention to use military force against Taiwan, Chen's administration promises not to do the following things (the "Four Noes"):
so the first problem was solved, since the second discussion, is only focused on the title therefore I recommend that the self contradiction be removed.
--Raraa 19:44, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem Solved? 

message: Chen has revealed he planned to draft a new constitution, which many conjectured would be pro-separatist, before he stepped down in 2008.
Um, it's only 2009 right now?  What happened to the new Constitution for Taiwan?? 210.71.3.188 (talk) 13:05, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chen didn't "step down" in 2008
Talk:Liouville–Neumann series

message: Should the third equation start with \phi_n rather than \phi?  Otherwise there's a subscript n on the right side of the equation but not the left.
:Good catch! I went back to my source to double check, and I did indeed omit a subscript n there. Thanks for spotting the error. Bryan
In the last equation but one, should K_{n+1} be K_n? Also there should be definition K_0(x,z)=\delta(x-z)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2401:DE00:1:2218:9DA2:3D3:7FB1:CD86 (talk) 09:28, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes! Fixed.   Cuzkatzimhut (talk) 00:08, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

message: The term resolvent refers to some operator. Yet, in the phrase "The resolvent (or solving kernel) is then given by ...." it is completely unclear which operator's resolvent is meant, at least to the common reader. Would be great if anyone could insert the information.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.217.197.27 (talk) 09:00, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resolvent of what?
Talk:Buzzword

message: Pokémon fans already know that the Pokémon in question’s name is not buzzword, people who don’t know much about Pokémon won’t even know that Buzzwole exists Cretaceousa (talk) 02:35, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nobody is going to confuse “buzzword” with “Buzzwole” 

message: I have major concerns whether Buzzword bingo is a notable concept, but instead of trial by fire at AfD, how about we consider merging it here first? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:53, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Buzzword bingo]] 

message: Roman common people (average folks) 2603:9000:2503:E79B:8D6E:69F3:F30F:3D4E (talk) 22:21, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: I've boldly removed the unreferenced terms from this list, since they're apparently words that someone was tired of hearing at the moment and not anchored in any linguistic analysis or critical review. -- Mikeblas (talk) 20:00, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Thermopylae

message: Am I correct in assuming that this article should be about the place, while the battles should have their own articles? The 480 BC one, at least, which I was just about to expand when I thought of this question.  I can think of other precedents (Hittin has its own article separate from the Battle of Hattin, for example), so I will move this if there are no objections. Adam Bishop 19:17, 24 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Battle of Thermopylae has plenty to say, it's enormous. This page should be about the place, as it is now, and should link to the various battles, as it does... Adam Bishop 14:25, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A clarification is needed: were the 48 men that were with Diakos also roasted alive? It is not clear from the sentence.  Andreas  (T) 14:16, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek War of Independence 

message: The original paragraph said "always exaggerated", and I really doubt that its ALWAYS exaggerated. In order to keep it consistant with the "battle of..." article I edited it too cause it originally said "2 million - 200,000" in the article itself. Deathshroud 22:55, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited battle of thermopylae 

message: I want to add an "In the media" section mentioning the 300 film/book. How does one go about that?138.243.129.4 20:20, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be more appropriate on the Battle of Thermopylae page, which already links to Battle of Thermopylae in popular culture (which redirects to Sparta in popular culture for some reason). Adam Bishop 06:56, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the page to Battle of Thermopylae in popular culture as all of the information came from this page and had nothing to do with Sparta in general. --Philip Baird Shearer 06:19, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "In the media" 

message: Should we not have some geography and geology here?Dave (talk) 13:03, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: How about some geography?

message: Tell your friends you saw this place and the writing here tell your friends that the men here died before you came for the ideals of SPARTA speak that name in reverence in public we died here for its ideals.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.1.191.34 (talk) 06:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion of alternative translation of words on monument 

message: Rich Farmbrough, 03:22, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: In Our Time

message: I have changed all the references to shoreline retreat to advance.  Shoreline retreat means erosion while accretion is shoreline advance.  Perhaps the words are different in some other language, but that's how it's described in English.   Randall Bart    Talk   17:04, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shoreline retreat or advance
Talk:Long Island Rail Road

message: I have marked this article as needing a map as the current one is outdated with the route to Grand Central not being shown. Not majorly important, but still should be there. --98.113.199.235 (talk) 14:21, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I just tried fixing it and it didn’t work. Requesting help from someone who knows how to fix that template. --IndustryPlantCooper (talk) 17:16, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

text: , see here. Cards84664 06:27, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks again. It looks like all the other templates look okay too. --IndustryPlantCooper (talk) 16:15, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Map Update (2023)
Talk:Fallen Dragon

message: Please please comment on this page :). (So far made only by me) Perhaps using User talk:Thue.
Thue 20:15, 24 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Liking the book is all well and good, but wikipedia talk pages are for discussions on improving the article, as seen below. Lots42 (talk) 05:43, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: :The bit about time travel was speculation and original research. I removed it.
:The bits about the themes of the novel was same. So same.
:The bits about the economy of the society was by it's nature, redundant. If it's important to note that Company XYZ does Something Illegal, that should be noted in the plot section.
:The plot section was waaaay too long and I put in the tag indicating such. Lots42 (talk) 05:43, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: My changes
Talk:Urho Kekkonen

message: Shouldn't the Helsinki Accords (Treaty of Friendship etc whatever the full name) be mentioned somewhere in the "Legacy" section? Those were important, no? Iron Condor (talk) 18:52, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Legacy

message: To Talk:Urho Kekkonen/Archive 1. --CaptainNtheGameMaster (talk) 18:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk page archived
Talk:Andronikos I Komnenos

message: The uncited description of Andronikos' public execution is found in the history of Niketas Choniates. I would cite it myself but don't have the work on hand.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:37EF:2460:A1BE:1739:D280:BD93 (talk) 01:48, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Tried a google search?
Thanks for the pointer, anon. I have added it to the bibliography. Andrew Dalby http://perso.wanadoo.fr/dalby/ 14:17, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: source for his execution

message: I am looking for a book entitled "Against the Fall of Night" by M. Arnold about this particular emperor and his times. Any info please posts here. Thank you.
:Tried a google search?
Thanks for the pointer, anon. I have added it to the bibliography. Andrew Dalby http://perso.wanadoo.fr/dalby/ 14:17, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: # Yes, I suppose so, although the Angeloi who followed were close relatives -- cousins, roughly.
# I think the "wise measures" is a phrase out of the Encyclopaedia Britannica. There's something in it, perhaps, but in practice these measures were negated by Andronikos's unfortunate blind spots. Trying to wipe out the aristocracy was maybe not such a good idea. A bit of rewriting wanted, perhaps? Andrew Dalby 10:50, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  yes ... 

message: Surely the capital of the Principality of Galicia was Halych (Galich), not Kiev.  Kiev was a principality itself, hundreds of miles to the east of Galicia, and at the time of Andronicus' escape was ruled by Rostislav.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Urselius (talk • contribs) 19:12, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Kiev? 

message: There's a contradiction in the "death" paragraph: he is thrown over in 11th of sept., beaten for three days and dies 12th of sept.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.95.41.96 (talk) 21:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction
Talk:Antichain

message: Width is defined as the cardinality of a maximum antichain, but such antichain need not exist.
As an example (for height), we could take the disjoint union of all sets \{1,\ldots,n\} for positive integers n (with the standard ordering on all the components and no new relations).
In this poset there are chains of every positive length, but there is no maximum chain.
So we should either say that height/width are not always defined, or we should define them in terms of suprema.
--Leen Droogendijk (talk) 10:13, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Height and width are not properly defined

message: It states:
1 A maximal antichain is an antichain that is not a proper subset of any other antichain.
2 A maximum antichain is an antichain that has cardinality at least as large as every other antichain.
3 The width of a partially ordered set is the cardinality of a maximum antichain.
4 Any antichain can intersect any chain in at most one element...
Statements 1 and 4 are fine.
Statement 2 is not. (beyond the above comment, that I would solve by having infinite width)
First it is not correctly stated 'at least as large as every other antichain'. 
I take it to mean: 'All maximum antichains have the same cardinality'.
But this is not correct.
Consider the power set P of a finite set E with the inclusion order.
The set {E} is an maximal antichain; its cardinal is 1.
If E contains an element e, the set {E\{e},{e}} is also a maximal antichain, its cardinal is 2.
I feel that the confusion comes from the fact that E and E\{e}∪{e} have indeed the same cardinality.
But this is related to a particular kind of order and does not apply to order-theory as a whole.
Statement 3 is consequently not well-defined.
It should be: 'The partial order width of P is the maximum cardinal number of an antichain in P' as stated in the Wolfram page linked at the end of this onehttp://mathworld.wolfram.com/Antichain.html.
-- Jérôme Euzenat
194.199.22.76 (talk) 17:06, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps you are getting confused by the fact that the word "maximal" in 1 and the word "maximum" in 2 look so similar? They are not the same word and they have different meanings. In your example, your 1-element and 2-element antichains are maximal, but (unless E has only two elements) neither is maximum. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:57, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: The 'Height and width' section seems incorrect (beside the above comment)
Talk:Quasi-Governmental Multi-National Conglomorate Corporations

message: Hello there anonymous user, welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page or how to format them visit our manual of style. Experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump.
This article has been suggested for deletion, because the term you've used in the title doesn't appear to be in general usage. Perhaps you'd like to contribute the information to the multinationals page instead, where I think it would feel more at home?
Thanks, and happy Wiki-ing,
Onebyone 00:38, 25 Oct 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Formica exsecta

message: Hello, everyone! I am currently an undergraduate student and have made some edits to this page as part of an assignment. I added a new Behavior section, focusing on the sex allocation of this species. I think that this page could still use a lot more information (maybe some more subheadings?), especially under the Behavior heading. As I am new to Wikipedia, any feedback, both about my edits and future work on this page, would be greatly appreciated! Thanks! Jdhale (talk) 01:54, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Behavior

message: Hi I am doing a Wikiproject for school.
The article mainly deals with the locations that the rare ant dwells at (Southwest England, Sweden, Tibet).  Interestingly, the F. exsecta can either be a monogyne form where the colony has a single egg-laying queen, or a polygyne form where many egg-laying queens are part of the same colony.  Unfortunately, there is only one reference on this page.  One thing it’s missing is research mentioned in the book, conducted by Sundstom and Boomsma.  They compared the sex ratio of eggs of colonies that contained multiply mated females and of eggs in colonies with singly mated queens.  The proportion of males decreased significantly between the egg and pupal stages in colonies with singly mated queens, suggesting that the workers are selectively neglecting or destroying males.  This manipulation of sex ratio harks back to coefficient of relatedness.  Female workers are more related to each other than to their brothers, thus they would want to manipulate the ratio.  However, in a colony that has multiply mated females, the female workers can’t tell which are their siblings, so the ratio becomes more even.
Under the Talk tab, there isn’t much discussion.  Some made the comment that it should not be referred to its common name as “narrow headed ant” because most know it as Formica exsecta.  They also point out a little typo (and should’ve been an). Alexliu818 (talk) 19:55, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: This article should be moved back to Formica exsecta. The "common name" is not sufficiently well-used to merit the article's residence under it. The vast majority of people aware of this ant refer to it as Formica exsecta alone. It has various other "common" names too, which are as rarely used as "narrow headed ant". These common names (jncluding "narrow headed") should be mentioned and put on record, but one should not be given undue prominence by being to main namespace, lest wikipedia give a false impression of how this ant is known. 80.255 16:26, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I totally agree. Please move this article to Formica exsecta. 84.179.233.7 17:09, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Inappropriate page moving
Talk:Charles MacArthur

message: Benefactor. Good word for this, tnx. But "in" rather than "of" seems clearer, perhaps bcz in the grants, they are (or play the role of) the benefactor of (or maybe to) the "geniuses".
Tnx, i guess i get to be the picture in Wikiquote next to "Advertising pays", & i should start looking for a photo with a suitably dazed expression -- i've heard enough ads saying "JD & CT MacA Fndn" that it never occurred to me to refer to it as "MacA Fndn", despite the domain name! [grin, blush]
Of course the link should be to the MacA F'ship article, but IMO it's worth keeping "genius" in the text of this article bcz people may not remember what the MacA F'ships are, but can easily check their formal name by hovering the link i propose, 'the so-called "genius awards"'. (Not "grants"? Keeping an ear open to next news coverage.) I think pretty much everything applies for JD MacA article, tho i won't be sure until i edit that.  If you revert, and tell me why, you'll continue to be a benefactor to me in improving my skill.  [smile]
(On reflection, i'm also cutting the HA-5-0 dates from this actor's father's article, & just making sure they're in the actor's article.) 
Tnx again; nice working w/ you. --Jerzy 01:16, 2003 Oct 25 (UTC)
:Hi, thanks for the note. Yep, sometimes you have to hunt a bit to find the correct titles to articles. And it is difficult since the internal search function is disabled. Several times I have written up pieces, and then discovered that someone else had already created an entry under a slightly different title. 
:I know you didn't write the original article on the MacArthur Fellowship but there is one item in it I am wondering about it: it states the award is only given to American citizens yet there are foreigners on that list, such as Alma Guillermoprieto. Wondering where that statement came from... 
:Bye for now... -- Viajero 08:36, 25 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Geography of Kenya

message: Does Kenya have land regions?
:Yes, though we may not yet have a suitably licensed map available or created which shows them. JamesDay 22:56, 25 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A maybe useful free image is figure 1 from article  --Snek01 (talk) 11:07, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: Is there any 154.154.208.186 (talk) 22:56, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  dry ocean
Talk:2000 Taiwanese presidential election

message: I tried to translate the Chinese version. Check my work. I don't know the romanized names of the VP candidates. Please fill them in. --Jiang 06:45, 25 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Should they be in pinyin or tongyong pinyin or english names? i can help if pinyin is appropriate to be used here. --FallingInLoveWithPitoc 07:09, 25 Oct 2003 (UTC)

text: Nice translations! I've Googled out their English names, and 4 of the 5 VPs have them officially! --Menchi 07:24, 25 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of order theory topics

message: Comment on Michael Hardy's edit comment. I've been writing quite a number of lists, in what I consider an reasonable logical or pedagogical order of topics. As far as I'm concerned making them alphabetical would be a loss of information. Of course others may disagree. But in any case the chosen order is far from random - it represents an unpacking of my own brain.
Charles Matthews 07:18, 25 Oct 2003 (UTC)
Talk:ZIP files

message: any difference between this and Zip (file format)? I think we can merge this two articles together. --FallingInLoveWithPitoc 07:28, 25 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged. Dysprosia 07:32, 25 Oct 2003 (UTC)

text: You can try ZIP first (then you can find a disambiguous page). Sometimes, you may find an empty page, then just try, like, "Zip" or "zip" too. I think that works. --FallingInLoveWithPitoc 12:02, 25 Oct 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Gustav Schwarzenegger

message: :"He was also the father of Hollywood star and Governor of California Arnold Schwarzenegger."
I would assume that the only reason he is know, and has an article on Wikipedia, is because he is Arnold Schwarzenegger's father. Being an active Nazi makes him more notbale than the parents of other celebrities, and thus perhaps deserving of his own page (as opposed to simply a brief mention of Arnold's page), but being a Nazi in and of itself is not what makes him notable, certainly no more notable, or deserving of a Wikipedia article, than numerous others who were members of the SA. The article needs to make this clear from the start, yet the first few paragraphs seem to imply otherwise - that he has this page because he was a Nazi. - Matthew238 05:53, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notoriety

message: Some assertions are not in the stated source and appears to be some editor's attempt to prove guilt by association. I have tagged citation needed them and will remove them soon.Sjö (talk) 11:07, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced 

message: Last night, my dad said that Arnold Schwarzenegger’s dad Gustaf was a champion curler. Is that true? I can’t even find any evidence in this article that Gustaf ever participated in curling events. 2603:9001:2100:B480:1930:202C:E32A:F372 (talk) 20:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curling 

message: "[He]...applied to be a member of the SA in the early years of the annexation"
He apparently applied to be a member in May 42. Anschluss was March 38. The end of Anschluss was May 45. I'd've said he applied to join not in the early years, but almost exactly half way through the annexation  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.18.166.19 (talk) 06:42, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Membership of the SA
Talk:List of straits

message: Does this list really have to be split off from Strait? It's not a long list. --seav 07:57, Oct 25, 2003 (UTC)
:Originally I thought so too, but accidently discovered there were some that were not being indexed, and upon re-review, I decided the list is likely to be substantially longer when it's finished. It's also generally better for list of reference tables to link to a list rather than a discursive article; readers go there to find lists, not to find articles that might have a list hidden in them. :-) Stan 16:33, 27 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Should the list be turned into a table? Including metrics like width/depth, location or joined bodies of water or even maritime traffic estimates could provide a more interesting view than just a list of names.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.180.150.202 (talk) 13:44, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Would it be possible to indicate which of these are 'International Straits' in terms of the International Law of the Sea?
Angrhoiel (talk) 13:41, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  International straits
Talk:List of retired NHL players

message: How many hundreds of people would actually belong on this list? RickK 08:04, 25 Oct 2003 (UTC)

message: *List of retired NHL players.  In the 80 or so years that the NHL has existed, how many hundreds of people would fit on this list? RickK 08:06, 25 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: From [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion|VfD]]
Talk:Media of Hong Kong

message: The article is out of date. It seems not to have been edited for about five years. m.e. (talk) 12:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date 

message: Please add Apple Daily's recent controversy and shutdown to reflect the present. Thanks! OnlineTL (talk) 05:04, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree that Apple Daily's recent developments should be added. Will also need to add context on the NSL and various outlets moving China/Asia bureaus to Taiwan, in the media freedom section. Butterdiplomat (talk) 17:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apple Daily
Talk:Sing Tao Daily

message: What does it mean by "to stimulate trial and purchase cost effectively"?:Gp8emily 11:21, 25 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: What does it mean

message: The second paragraph is too promotive. Gakmo 09:48, 31 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Promotive

message: What's the Hong Kong circulation? It was 91,000 in 1995 but is believed to be less than half that now 180.87.27.226 (talk) 09:06, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Circulation?