Talk:Heathenry in the United States

message: the article presenting the "Kennewick man" incident as if it was a serious controversy is a disgrace.
Google McNallen and Solutrean, and you will find what this is about, lots of articles on sites like nazi.org and stromfront.org making out that "Native" Americans stole country from the Caucasians they murdered! (sic!!)
Now this is so far over the brink of sanity or decency that we can, for whatever it is worth, discuss this on McNallen's article, but if we are going to discuss this under "Asatru", it should come with some independent commentary putting it in proper perspective and firmly placing it under the "racism" header where it belongs. --dab (𒁳) 15:19, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree that it is undue weight to have a section on McNallen's outrageous, racist claims as if they were taken seriously. It should be under racism if a serious number of Asatruar agreed with him (eek!) and laid at his doorstep alone if he was largely alone in this campaign. I see it's already been added to his article, so does it still need to be here at all?  Anywhere this is included, the contrasting view needs to be covered. - Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 05:28, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Kennewick man

message: Basic question: Should this article be renamed "Heathenry in the United States"?
More information: This article is currently titled "Ásatrú in the United States", and is devoted to the subject of Heathenry, a modern Pagan new religious movement, as it exists in the United States. As the GA-rated article on Heathenry makes clear, "Heathenry" is the term which is commonly used (in particular by academics) as a catch-all to cover the entirety of this new religious movement. Other terms, such as "Asatru" and "Odinism", are favoured by some practitioners but are avoided by others, and lack the wider coverage of the term "Heathenry". Given that many of the Heathens in the United States do not use "Asatru" but instead favour "Odinism" or other terms, it seems problematic to have this page titled  "Ásatrú in the United States", with "Heathenry in the United States" being a much more inclusive and apposite title. I believe that this should be a fairly un-controversial change and would like to gain consensus in support of it from various otherwise un-involved editors. Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:46, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC: Should this article be renamed "Heathenry in the United States"

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Heathenry in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101030054005/http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=18629 to http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=18629
*Added  tag to http://www.kscourts.org/CA10/cases/2005/08/05-1180.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified