lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of reggae musicians

message: TONTO IRIE, RAS MATTHEWS
Anthony B
Bunny General
Dr Ring-Ding & the Senior All-Stars
Frisco Kid
Michael Rose
Sidonie Royal
Honorebel
Whorl-A-Girl
Don Juan
Lexxus (Mr Lexx)
Junior C
King Tubby
Lion
The Cimarons
Brinsley Ford
Goofy
Dill Brothers
Hopeton Lewis
Tommy McCook
Jah Vinci
but I'm getting somewhere... WATHIIK.
Thank you Melanin Sky (talk) 18:03, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Still a couple missing...

message: I'm removing Queen (band) from the list. Not being a fan I don't know if they ever made any reggae songs but I would argue that, even if they did, they are not primarily known as reggae musicians and so don't belong on this list. Equally if the Queen (band) meant is another unknown reggae act then it still doesn't belong here as it is linking to the article about Freddie Mercury et al. There again perhaps it was just vandalism but I felt I needed to explain my reasoning just in case. Keresaspa (talk) 17:00, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queen 

message: I added The Clash, The Police, The Ruts, Bad Brains, and The Slits to the list. All of them have been very important to the genre, and helped spreading Reggae music and its sub-derivative genres (such as Dub, Ragga[muffin], Reggae Fusion, and etcetera) in their own country and/or worldwide. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 11:02, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Clash and other Reggae bands 

message: Why isn't Lucky Dube and Jah Vinci included in the list of names of reggae artists Melanin Sky (talk) 18:00, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lucky Dube 

message: Hi.  This list use to be A thru Z.  Now, it only goes to H. 24.111.209.247 (talk) 00:31, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: should work now DanTheMusicMan2 (talk) 01:20, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The list got cut short!?
Talk:Index set

message: :In mathematics, an index set I is another name for a function domain.
This statement seems to me to exemplify a deficiency in the way mathematicians think.  Currently accepted canons of logical rigor will bless this assertion, but nonetheless mathematicians are thinking about something differently when they call it an index set than when they call it a domain of a function.  Everyone can explain the difference if they think about it, but only when speaking "informally".  Michael Hardy 20:32, 15 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Phrasing

message: In the notation (Ai), the symbol A is the mapping, and not the codomain of the mapping. I'll change the article. Bo Jacoby 08:44, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  confusion 

message: *Oppose This is self contained section and contains useful information. So, not a good idea to merge them.  Phoe6 (talk) 23:38, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal 

message: I noticed that index set and indexed set link to different articles on Wikipedia. Is this correct, or is it an error?
Jarble (talk) 14:55, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's not an error. It's like the difference between a lessor and a lessee: they're at opposite ends of a relationship. — Quondum 15:16, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Is an "index set" the same as an "indexed set", or is this an error?
Talk:Acting Sheriff

message: See Talk:Acting Sheriff/Delete for archived discussions on whether this page should have been deleted. -- Angela 20:55, 15 December 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: When giving times, please give relevant timezone information. (Or do the X Eastern/Y Central thing that is done normally with TV times.) -- 128.104.112.147 (talk) 20:19, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Times
Talk:Ruth Pitter

message: This article is part of WikiProject Poetry. See that page for guidelines. Jwrosenzweig 21:46, 15 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since per ODNB and the book cited, her birth name per the certificate was "Ruth Pitter", and she was also KNOWN by this name, what's the source for the "Emma Thomas Pitter" element?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.24.239.180 (talk) 03:29, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Naples

message: *
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeandré du Toit (talk • contribs) 21:11, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Further reading suggestion from OTRS 2009070410026712.

message: Don't you mean Napolitan? Napoli->Napolitano! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.108.206.137 (talk) 18:09, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You will just have to put up with Greek influence in English.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.75.107.201 (talk) 14:02, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Neapolitan??

message: Hello. I would like to refer to this page which is the official site of the Comune of Naples. On this page, it notes several different 'sister cities' than on the official wikipedia, so I think an update to reflect this would be good. The only issue is that I'm not sure if these are 'partnerships' or official twinning agreements. Would someone be able to let me know? Kind regards, Lucky102 (talk) 08:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sister cities
Talk:Greek Old Calendarists

message: Are these the Paleoemerologites ?
Yes.
This article has major POV and verifiability issues. Regarding the sizes of the various GOC groups, they would be impossible to verify. The Matthewites have split into at least three small groups: one headed by Gregorios of Messina, one by Kyrikos and another by Nicholas. Parishes and clergy move back and forth between the Kiousis synod and the Makarios synod almost daily. The split between Kiousis and the Makarians is highly debatable as to who left who and over which of a number of issues. This article needs major revision.Wikigator 03:37, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "However, excepting for groups split-off from ROCOR, no official inter-communion exists between the Greek Old Calendarists and ROCOR at the present day, due to the recent reunification of ROCOR and the Russian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate)."  Why not?  What does the reunification of ROCOR and the ROC have to do with it? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 23:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Greek Old Calendarists are in schism with the mainline Orthodox Church; ROCOR, by and large, had likewise so been, but by joining the ROC they have now come into communion with the Patriarch of Constantinople who doesn't even recognize the sacraments of the Greek Old Calendarists.  Thus, only split offs from ROCOR who eschew ROCOR as no longer representing true Orthodoxy, analogously to the Greek Old Calendarists likewise not reckoning the Church of Greece as legitimately Orthodox, are in communion with the latter.  Vincent J. Lipsio (talk) 01:38, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no communion with Russians?  

message: hello. The book I added in the Further readings section could be used to greatly improve the article. You seem to have some knowledge on the subject, so would you be interested in doing this? Veverve (talk) 17:22, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Greetings! While I appreciate your thought and the challenge, there are several dozen Wikipedia edits on my list, mostly for more widely read articles. Nonetheless, there is a second, smaller part of my previous edit that I'll perform some time soon. Vincent J. Lipsio (talk) 20:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  In need of rewriting 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :GREEK OLD CALENDARISTS. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 10#GREEK OLD CALENDARISTS until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Veverve (talk) 05:42, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "GREEK OLD CALENDARISTS" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Oujda

message: The most recent change reads as if there were half a million residents in the 10th century.  I doubt if that's correct, but could someone help me to be sure? RickK 23:18, 15 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Morrow Project

message: The link you have given is a RPG fan page that listed the first paragraph of the description of The Morrow Project in his discussion about the imagninary vehicle he built to use in a TMP or GRUPS game.
I am the copyright holder of The original website that paragraph was taken from. 
Again it is a general description of the game. We often put it in advertising materails.  We also use it as a standard explanation of the game when people ask.
I still don't understand what you are objecting to.
----
This article and its content is currently being discussed at the Village Pump. —Frecklefoot 16:44, 17 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: The heavy Recon teams are called Recondo(Recon-Commando) right? --Theredstarswl 20:57, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recondo? 

message: This section seems to be both short and incomplete.
The hyperlink to Robert Sadler is wrong; it links to a Wikipedia page about an Australian politician who died in the 1920s.
HScrimgeour (talk) 17:07, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game history 

message: So, in 2013 Christopher Morrell and Robert O'Connor produced the 4th edition rules for this game, as you can see here:
https://www.amazon.com/Morrow-Project-4th-Role-play-Post-Apocalyptic/dp/0976604345
https://www.abebooks.com/9780976604341/Morrow-Project-4th-Edition-Science-0976604345/plp
https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Morrow_Project_4th_Edition.html?id=JctjrgEACAAJ
https://rpggeek.com/rpgitem/140527/morrow-project-4th-edition
See ISBN 10: 0976604345  ISBN 13: 9780976604341
Chris and Tammy Garland bought out Timeline Ltd. in 2017, and in 2020 Chris started a Kickstarter to produce a (second?) "4th Edition" rules (i.e. technically 5th edition). This version was never printed/produced/released. 137.244.82.100 (talk) 18:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion over 4th and "4th" editions
Talk:Supernormal stimulus

message: The football is an urban myth, I believe.  It certainly shouldn't be in the article unless we can produce a reference to a paper of Lorenz's describing the experiment.  Lorenz did use a football-sized cardboard easter egg (as used in Germany and Austria for wrapping Easter presents), but that was in a different experiment, on eggrolling, and I don't think he ever did choice experiments with this stimulus.  seglea 23:42, 15 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shoe fetishism

message: Why does shoeplay redirect here? This article doesn't mention shoeplay (which is not always sexual) atall. As I recall there was a shoeplay article (and quite a good one as well), but evidently a redirect happened - and as far as I can see without any discussion prior to the redirect http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shoeplay&action=history (It appears to have been deleted without anyone attempting to add in sources - lack of edits up to redirection)And as far as I can tell there was no community discussion on the redirect - if there was and someone could point me to the archive of it i'd be grateful.  81.79.73.71 20:08, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Shoeplay was redirected here for being unsourced, and for being original research. Those are good reasons. Anyone wanting to add information about "non-sexual" shoeplay will need to cite a reference. / edg ☺ ★ 21:04, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

text: WP:NOTCENSORED. ~ RobTalk 13:58, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Shoeplay redirects here - yet no mention of it

message: I think the article should also mention "pointe fetishism" (related to ballet fetishism, but focused on pointe shoes) --J.P.B., August 15, 2008.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.104.58.174 (talk) 12:38, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pointe? 

message: "Altocalciphilia" redirects here, without being mentioned. Supposedly it means high heel fetish, though it might be a made-up word. --Rev L. Snowfox (talk) 15:01, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Altocalciphilia? 

message: Shoe fetishism is also very common in at least male homosexual community, from my personal experience, but this page seems exclusively heterosexual. Especially mentioning only "women's shoes" seems a bit problematic. Anyone who has further knowledge on homosexual fetishism should help add further information. 11:19, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homosexual shoe fetishism missing? 

message: Much of it is completely unsourced.  Thinking a rewrite with better sourcing.  Thoughts? Surv1v4l1st ╠Talk║Contribs╣ 04:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prevalence section
Talk:Albatros Flugzeugwerke

message: Does anybody know anything about the Albatros L 45, apparently also known as Alabatros D.XIIIa? That article is one of the shortest stubs I've ever seen. According to the German Wikipedia article, Albatros D.V, it was a development of the D.V which was never ordered. Perhaps we can give it a mention here and delete the rather pathetic stub.  Alansplodge (talk) 20:16, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Albatros L 45
Talk:Fishing line

message: I have a feeling that this article (except for the opening paragraph, which I wrote myself) is a thinly disguised attempt to pull our collective leg.  I'm not a master fisherman by any means, but all of the fishing lines I've seen seem to have been made of nylon, and some of the materials listed here seem positively outlandish. -Smack 00:39, 16 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: I have a feeling

message: is: http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiskelina
I don't know how the linking to it is done, can someone please fix?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.16.53.123 (talk) 16:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The swedish page

message: I'm not a fishing line expert.
I came to this page to learn if any type of fishing line had a lesser tendency to tangle.
A search of the page did not find tangle.
If anyone wants to update the page on this issue, or leave me a response, please do so.
Betweendust (talk) 20:35, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  tangle
Talk:Captain Marvel

message: I don't understand the apparently contradictory statements that Captain Marvel as a comic book hero DOES NOT EXIST and the first link on this page that talks about the Fawcett comic book hero Captain Marvel, which was made into the show, Adventures of Captain Marvel (listed as the first comic book hero on film).
I didn't want to just change it in case there is some subtlety of which I am unaware.  Any comments would be appreciated.  Thanks!
Thestorm042 22:22, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's very poorly phrased, obviously, since the page is a list of characters that have gone by the name "Captain Marvel." It also "shouts" needlessly, like the editor , for some reason, was angry. I'll rephrase it, nicely. oknazevad 02:03, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradictory statements
Talk:Captain Marvel (DC Comics)

message: ==Untitled==
This page should be moved to Shazam (character) Captain Marvel isn't his name anymore. Marveldccomicsfan (talk) 01:59, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The fact they specify he was known as Captain Marvel for much of his history before addressing he's called "Shazam" now illustrates that the old name is still in use and the RECENTISM of the change. The name "Captain Marvel" is still frequently used to refer to the character in reliable sources (), not to mention that he's still referred to as Captain Marvel in the ongoing Young Justice show and comics published as recently as 2016. The new name hasn't replaced "Captain Marvel" in the cultural consciousness yet. I'm also going to ask that you please refrain from WP:BLUDGEONING. JOEBRO64 21:07, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

text: Support - Per what wolf said. Higher Further Faster (talk) 20:30, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to move page to [[Shazam (disambiguation)|Shazam (character)]] 

message: This page should be moved to Shazam (character) Captain Marvel isn't his name anymore. Marveldccomicsfan (talk) 01:59, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The fact they specify he was known as Captain Marvel for much of his history before addressing he's called "Shazam" now illustrates that the old name is still in use and the RECENTISM of the change. The name "Captain Marvel" is still frequently used to refer to the character in reliable sources (), not to mention that he's still referred to as Captain Marvel in the ongoing Young Justice show and comics published as recently as 2016. The new name hasn't replaced "Captain Marvel" in the cultural consciousness yet. I'm also going to ask that you please refrain from WP:BLUDGEONING. JOEBRO64 21:07, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

text: Support - Per what wolf said. Higher Further Faster (talk) 20:30, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We have owned our home for 42 years and was changing one of the ballasts in our finished basement and a bean bag fell out.  It said Mary Marvel Toss Bag, and Mary Marvel has a cape on like a super hero.  We were wondering if you would like us to send you a [ 96.19.107.229 (talk) 21:09, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fawcett Comics 

message: Evidence suggests that the first 2 issues of Whiz Comics were not renewed as required by law then. This means that the character and derivative works are in the public domain in the United States. DC would own the remaining issues still under copyright, DC-produced works, and their associated trademarks (which does not include the Captain Marvel moniker) Best regards, ~Whig 18:19, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Academic evidence: Captain Marvel is a public domain character, DC only owns their IP.
Talk:Journey into Space

message: I downloaded a version of "Operation Luna" from the internet which consists of 12 not 13 episodes. Episodes 11 and 12 are longer than the others and appear to contain the final three episodes of the original show, with 12 (original) cut in two and divided between them. Who is responsible for this edit? I assume it was done in order to fit the broadcast into a single season of 3x4 weeks? Danceswithzerglings (talk) 09:36, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about edit 

message: WHAT series was it exactly that was uncovered on those 16-inch discs that the BBC engineer restaurated so well? Was it the original 1953 version of the series (still called "Journey into Space") or the sort of abridged re-recordings, i. e. those renamed to "Operation Luna", from 1958? Nowhere in the article this is pointed out without making the reader wonder...-andy 77.190.13.179 (talk) 21:23, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  I must say, I'm confused now. 

message: Suggestion for improvement :
On one level this radio dramatisation is an entertaining if at times unintentionally (with hindsight) hilarious dramatisation of a post war book.
On the other there is clearly scope for some mention of its Cold War influences, post war context and position within an overall decline in Britain's global status and power specifically the abject failure of its 1950s aerospace programme. I would have thought this was necessary as the BBC has always taken its propaganda role very seriously - especially in the field of light entertainment. There must be references to critical discussion which might usefully be included in this article. 94.1.166.134 (talk) 11:27, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical Analysis (absence of) References Needed
Wikipedia talk:Unprotected MediaWiki messages

message: Prior comments were moved to WT:MNT which is the focal discussion page for MediaWiki namespace messages. Before commenting on this page consider doing there instead as it is probably more closely watched. Dori | Talk 02:53, Dec 16, 2003 (UTC)
:If anyone watches this page, it should be stated that all the pages listed as not protected, are in fact protected from editing. Therefore they should be removed, this page should also be removed if no unprotected mediawiki pages exist. -- 00:31, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

message: As per the VfD page, I have edited this page to reflect the current status; someone who knows more fully may wish to elaborate. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 03:44, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD

message: Please change:
*  which also contains all previous and subsequent template messages.
to
*  which also contains all previous and subsequent templates. —⁠andrybak (talk) 12:48, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Graham87 13:55, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 21 February 2020
Talk:Théophile Gautier

message: Question concerning the Hashish club reference.  The statement that it was founded by Baudelaire, Gautier and Rimbaud seems impossible considering Baudelaire died in 1867 and Rimbaud did not leave home until 1870 for Paris.
Rimabud wasn't born when Gautier published his Hashish club essays.  They could not have been co-founders as the article suggests.
1911 says he died in December but other web pages say he died in October.  Which is correct? silsor 21:50, Sep 22, 2004 (UTC)
=== Club des Hashischins ===
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Club_des_Hashischins
Link provided by karota_1334
=== Daucuskarota... ===
Is this character found on The Hashish club??
=== Louis the What?  ===
There's a link on the second novel entry stating that G.'s favorite historical period was that of Louis XIII; however, it links to Louis the twelfth.  Which is it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.169.51.238 (talk) 23:26, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There's a link on the second novel entry stating that G.'s favorite historical period was that of Louis XIII; however, it links to Louis the twelfth.  Which is it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.169.51.238 (talk) 23:26, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Louis the What?  

message: Bullshit, the book's about the adventures of a nobleman by the name of Sigognac. He adapts the name "Fracasse" later on.
31.6.137.46 (talk) 21:09, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Fracasse

message: the majority of his life = most of his life Pamour (talk) 20:56, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution

message: @ SMP0328: It seems to me that you are better acquainted with US constitutional law than me. I'm interessted in wether the Re-Examination Clause of the Seventh Amendment applies to the states or not. Accordingly I have one question. The opinion of the court in The Justices v. Murray of stated in part: " [...] the Seventh Amendment, upon its true construction, applies to a cause tried by a jury in a state court [...]." Does this mean that Re-Examination Clause of the Seventh Amendment applies to the states? Can you please include this source in your analysis? --P3Y229 (talk • contribs) 20:33, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The source you provide above says "The Amendment governs only courts which sit under the authority of the United States" (i.e., it applies only to federal courts). As for The Justices v. Murray, go to the end of the court's opinion (just above the sentence in italics). There you will see that the case was about a federal law that permitted federal courts to rule on the facts of cases that had been ruled on in a State court. The Supreme Court ruled that this law violated the Re-Examination Clause. The case about federal authority (congressional and judicial), not State authority. So this case not only did not apply any part of the Seventh Amendment to the States, such application was not at issue. I suggest you read this article. SMP0328. (talk) 21:35, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the information. I corrected the application of the Seventh Amendment's Re-Examination Clause to the states in the Seventh Amendment article and the incorperation of the bill of rights article. --P3Y229 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Happy to help. SMP0328. (talk) 01:42, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-Examination Clause of the Seventh Amendment and the ''The Justices v. Murray'' case