lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sir Wilfrid Laurier Collegiate Institute

message: I don't envy the person who does it but this section should be cleaned up. Perhaps as the trial unfolds it will be easier to present a more succinct version of his accomplishments and death, but until then it should be made to be no longer than any other alumni description.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geoguy2011 (talk • contribs) 09:11, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sgt. Ryan Russell
Talk:Chile Open (tennis)

message: There is a long, ongoing discussion at WP:Tennis about the tournament tables found in tennis articles on English-language Wikipedia (e.g., this type of table). The discussion is about whether the "official sponsored name" of a tournament - such as Pacific Life Open - or another tournament name without the sponsor - such as Indian Wells Masters - must be used in those articles. Please join the discussion here. Thanks.  Tennis expert (talk) 08:42, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for wider input on discussion at WikiProject Tennis 
Talk:Haddon Township High School

message: Discussion regarding infobox parameters can be found here.  Truthkeeper88 (talk) 15:55, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: The discussion is now archived, but can still be viewed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive666#Pixel size of a thumbnail for an infobox. --- Barek (talk) - 23:52, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

text: Please use the talk page to discuss the image size instead of edit warring. Thanks. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 04:20, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox parameters 
Talk:Garfield and Friends: Behind the Scenes

message: I have the nonpreordered dvd and there are no special features! Why is that in the article? 99.230.152.143 22:31, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was vandalism. People are so stupid! Ryan Holloway 23:29, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Does he need a vandalism template or a block? 99.230.152.143 14:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Bonus Content"
Talk:List of Garfield home video releases

message: The Garfield website lists three episodes for this disc: "Garfield's Halloween Adventure", "Garfield's Thanksgiving" and "A Garfield Christmas".
The UK edition (also three episodes) that I personally own substitutes "Garfield's Thanksgiving" for "Garfield in the Rough", presumably because Thanksgiving is not a thing here. I added "Rough" to the list, taking the episode count from five to a whopping six. I assume that besides the modified UK edition, there are various international editions with differing episodes, and made this edit. Quite a bit of assumption on my part, yes, but I'm not really sure what's going on here and want the article to be factual. 2A02:C7F:8E43:2F00:8D6E:E5C:5BFC:AAEF (talk) 04:33, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you anon, as I edited it became increasingly obvious to me there were two holiday-themed compilations. The version I have absolutely has Garfield on the Town and Garfield in Paradise. Added your ref. Ribbet32 (talk) 04:39, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: SIX episodes for the ''Holiday Celebrations'' DVD?
Talk:A Garfield Christmas

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:Agarfieldchristmastitle.PNG, found on :A Garfield Christmas, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 15:59, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
Talk:MBC 3

message: :Image:Mbc3-logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tagsFair use|boilerplate fair use templateBMAH you m
the only thing that I, . , and , I was wondering how much you can get a good day.  Rodetube (talk) 15:50, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Mbc3-logo.jpg

message: This article is heavily opinionated and unencyclopedic. I've removed some lines that are baseless (such as unsourced censorship comparisons) claims and will work on improving it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Humuphile (talk • contribs) 12:50, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subjective Article 

message: I'm. n, . , the series has a very nice. the  Rodetube (talk) 15:51, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have a good time to do with  

message: Someone named Foxnpichu keep delelting things someone report him Taha Hossny (talk) 11:34, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request 

message: MBC3 156.223.239.36 (talk) 04:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  MBC3 

message: So i saw that Barney and Friends was aired on MBC 3 on this page, But i don't see any proof of this happening, Who was responsible for this? and do you have any proof? 2601:14D:4C00:6340:3C74:D861:BAC9:5F60 (talk) 16:54, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is Barney & Friends on MBC 3? 

message: 2603:8001:1900:895:981E:89DF:EC15:7B89 (talk) 13:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 March 2023
Talk:Baháʼí Faith in Afghanistan

message: This is one of the few books out there by Afghan authors disscussing the Baha'i faith:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/30548748-realize-the-unseen-instigators-in-6-major-religions  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8000:AB41:8F00:511C:13B3:8905:C770 (talk) 21:32, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Book covering Baha'is by Afghan author

message: There should be a mention of the Constitution where other religious groups are allowed.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.11.185.206 (talk) 18:52, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Constitution Law
Talk:Texas State Aquarium

message: Just a quick suggestion: It may help to add "as of" dates to some of the material instead of using wording like ""current" or adding disclaimers about possibly out-of-date material. For example, if we could find a source that listed the aquarium's exhibits, then we could say, "As of August 2021, the following exhibits are on display." That way the reader doesn't have to guess as to how current the information is. Wikipedia:As of may be helpful. Larry Hockett (Talk) 01:56, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "As of" dates
Talk:Air China Flight 129

message: Final report in English is at http://classic-web.archive.org/web/20061017200424/http://152.99.129.24/eng/rct/Final%20report-English2005.4.15.pdf
Appendices are at http://classic-web.archive.org/web/20061017200424/http://152.99.129.24/eng/rct/Appendix.zip (Archive)
WhisperToMe (talk) 15:04, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Accident

message: http://web.archive.org/web/20061009063507/http://www.moct.go.kr/EngHome/News/view.php?MID=EM051&HOMEPAGENAME=&DEPT=&UID=&id=8&num=1&board=n_english_news is an alternate URL for the crash stuff - but neither the report itself nor the appendices were captured
http://www.moct.go.kr/portal.do
May have been the MOCT homepage
WhisperToMe (talk) 22:24, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternate URL

message: I could not find any info on whether or not the captain was charged with any crimes or what happened to him next. Does anyone know what happened? Tigerdude9 (talk) 23:53, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criminal prosection of the captain
Talk:China Northern Airlines Flight 6136

message: This article is being censored by unknown meat puppets re new claims of Chinese Govt sabotage.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.25.50.253 (talk) 22:43, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Censored

message: He somehow managed to bring some gasoline aboard and then ignited it during the flight. Because of course no one would notice that 6 months after 9/11. That said, I was surprised by this: that most passengers, including Zhang, died of carbon monoxide inhalation. The engines, cabin floor, and other critical parts showed no signs of burning or explosion. So why couldn't the pilots put on their oxygen and just land?... Again a very weird plane crash and very sussy... results I'd take this  page with a massive grain of salt, only the official report, which as far as I know was never publicly released, will have answers as to the progression of the fire and how it affected the outcome of the flight. LuanLoud (talk) 13:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I dont think the plane crashed due to arson
Talk:Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University

message: Note:  Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article  --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:32, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition 

message: No separate notability S.G.(GH) ping! 09:49, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Student Apex Body HNB Garhwal Central University]]
Talk:Austral Líneas Aéreas Flight 2553

message: Suggest you check statement "power to the turbines"     The DC9 had radial engines i believe.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arydberg (talk • contribs) 19:12, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Powerplant

message: The data about the crater is uncomfortable to compare. The units (meters or feet) appear "mixed", in or out the parenthesis.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.48.84.176 (talk) 13:24, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the comment. The information is provided as it appears in the different supporting sources.--Jetstreamer  14:21, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units
Talk:Nepal Police Club

message: I removed the content under the title "Galaxy of Stars" and "Current Squad" and "Year 2012" because the information was totally false and seemed like a prank.
Acharyab15 (talk) 15:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: False information, galaxy of stars
Talk:Comair Flight 3272

message: COMAIR 3272 Accident Commentary.  My son, Ken Reece was the First Officer/Pilot in Command of the flight.  The summary provided by Wikipedia is incomplete.  If a person reads the NTSB report on the crash, it is sickening.  The reader will find that the FAA was primarily responsible for the accident - for a number of factors.  The pilots were blamed for operating at/below the minimums.  BUT the pilots encountered clear ice and did not see any reason not to slow.  Further, they were ordered to the slower speed by ground control.  Factors conveniently left out of the crash report.  The descent was on auto pilot which was at that time allowed.  The pilots did NOT know they were iced.  The EMB-120 was certified by the FAA for flight in heavy icing conditions with NO ice detection system and inadequate boot-style de-icing systems.  The crew and passengers never had a chance.  The FAA killed 29 people and got away without consequences.  After that crash, the FAA finally acted to correct the equipment and operations shortcomings.  When the public hearings were held, NO senators, congressmen or press attended because of their attention being on the Clinton/Lewinsky affair.  Shame on the FAA.  I loved and still miss my son every day.  He was a superb pilot.  I hate seeing articles where the pilot(s) were blamed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:79B0:8200:D168:BA94:2A19:3388 (talk) 22:44, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

message: The Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University page where the report would normally be lists sub-pages at https://libraryonline.erau.edu/online-full-text/ntsb/aircraft-accident-reports/AAR98-04.pdf , but these are of an older domain, and the links are broken :(
However they are backed up on the Wayback Machine:
* Main report, Appendices C, D, E, F, G, H, and I.
Also ERAU does have live links under the actual respective domains:
* Main report, Appendices C, D, E, F, G, H, and I.
WhisperToMe (talk) 04:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ERAU copy of the report.
Talk:Patriotic Movement of Ivory Coast

message: The indicated link of the official party website doesn't work at the moment (2010-12-06). Is that a permanent problem?
ThomasPusch (talk) 16:34, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link doesn't work
Talk:Clark and Michael

message: i think this show is over
Yeah, the way Michael was talking about it on Letterman made it sound like it was 10 episodes and that was it. DackAttac (talk) 06:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Thai Airways International Flight 311

message: So says the Mayday TV series.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.2.36.30 (talk) 03:03, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Mayday is not a reliable source. MilborneOne (talk) 20:59, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death of a British air crash investigator whilst faring up to the crash site 

message: Statements in the article about "the first officer's lack of initiative and inconclusive answers to the captain's questions" would benefit from references. The in the current edit, these conclusions seem to go beyond the  the official Napalese report.  Absent supporting evidence, some readers could interpret these comments as speculative.
In contrast, the Mayday episode does not emphasize the quoted statement, but allows only that the captain was overwhelmed, and that flight could have benefited from greater task delegation in the cockpit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LoadingDose (talk • contribs) 19:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree it needs a reliable source but note "Mayday" is not a reliable source. MilborneOne (talk) 20:58, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characterization of Thai-311 co-pilot statements and actions 

message: I'm trying to find a copy of the official accident report so that way the article can have more citations for verification, but I can't find one. There is no ebook preview on google books. Tigerdude9 (talk) 13:20, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual final report
Talk:Pakistan International Airlines Flight 268

message: SIR total number of passenger if u count down...is 148 not 155 
the number of crew mentioned under Pakistan is 19 but in grand total 12 .... how is that possible ... 
148+19 =167 makes sense 
but 155+12=167 doesnt ...figures dont add up to that number  Sabeershah (talk) 05:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calculation on the list is wrong  

message: Just click on the link: http://www.historyofpia.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=13303
Add more info and cite this!
:Not a reliable source. MilborneOne (talk) 14:20, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Never before seen photos and info 

message: https://gulfnews.com/today-history/september-28-1992-pakistani-plane-crashes-in-nepal-1.2097171 73.86.215.18 (talk) 22:54, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a reliable source?
Talk:Martinair Flight 495

message: Is the full text of the CVR necessary for the article? A few key points may be good for the article, but I don't think we need every single "ja" the crew said... Paris1127 (talk) 04:59, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  CVR (Cockpit Voice Recorder) Transcript 

message: I finally translated the article. It's a community draft as it's not finished yet: Draft:Martinair_Flight_495 Please help clean up and revise the draft. Tigerdude9 (talk) 03:55, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I attempted to make the article look less like directly translated. Pheanixx (talk) 12:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translated 

message: Where does the ground fatality come from? The only source that says it is this one , and it's not even that clear. All it says is "A rescue worker died shortly after the plane crash". Did they die during the rescue? If so, how?
Nothing else I could find makes any mention of the death of a rescue worker. Every other source puts the total fatality count at 56. Does anyone have an explanation for this discrepancy or confirmation of this death? LearyTheSquid (talk) 19:46, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: According to this site , a 57th candle is used in the annual commemoration for an airport worker who helped in the rescue and died in a traffic accident a week later. Good to know, but because they weren't actually killed in the plane crash or during the rescue, I will remove the mentions of a ground fatality in this article. LearyTheSquid (talk) 16:04, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ground fatality? 

message: Certain paragraphs are a direct 'lift' from the following publication: https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/dutch-aviation-council-acted-negligently-and-unlawfully-in-1992-faro-plane-crash-54374
namely, under the heading "2011 research and lawsuits"
I'm not sure that the information can be included by rewording, so perhaps leave it in, but acknowledge the source.
Also, I struggled to find an alternate way to describe the following sentence in Para 3, in particular the use of the word, 'served'.
"The case against Martinair, which had, in the meantime, become part of KLM, finally served on 13 January 2014 in Amsterdam."Pheanixx (talk) 12:01, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagarism / Acknowledgements
Talk:China Northwest Airlines Flight 2119

message: There is DEFINITELY NOT a flaps actuator per side, so it was not an actuator failure on one side or the other. There is one hydraulic motor, with a chain drive to a cross-shaft which contains universal joints to allow for wing flexing. There are several sensors monitoring the flaps, including a resolver at the outer end of the shaft on each wing, and a hydraulic brake mechanism, called the wing tip brake, at the outer end, which will hold the flaps STATIONARY if just about any failure, including cross-shaft fracture, occurs. That is, if the Flaps Computer is working correctly. Apparently it was, as it was returned to the manufacturer for test. Asymmetric flaps are usually catastrophic as they will overpower the normal roll control by the smaller ailerons, so prevention of asymmetry, the primary purpose of the Flaps Computer, is vital. As far as I know, there has never been a cross-shaft failure on the 146, but if there was on the crash aircraft, the flaps would have been locked in their extended position and the aircraft would have taken off.
It is most likely that the crew failed to check the "Takeoff Config" light which indicates that many systems, including flaps, have been set correctly for takeoff.
I joined the manufacturer of the flaps computer not long after this disaster, and one of my first tasks was to identify the problems with it. None of these related to it failing to perform the correct safety actions, rather it was causing flights to be delayed or cancelled due to false warnings, resulting from very poor work by its manifestly incompetent original designers, said to be a husband and wife team, somewhere in the USA. There were multiple errors, both analogue and digital. That was duly fixed, but I had to hand the redesign over to someone else as I was needed on the design of another project.
It was said that, following the verification of correct function of the Flaps Computer on the test rig at the factory, the Chinese executed the pilot by firing squad.
The truth will probably not be found from any official source. I am not sure how to obtain evidence to allow the truth to be told on Wikipedia.
Tiger99 (talk) 19:40, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for this information. My father was in China on work business, when he was killed by this disaster. It should have been the start of his return journey home to U.K. 92.16.31.118 (talk) 15:58, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The actual cause?
Talk:1993 Sukhumi airliner attacks

message: Since the company is called Transair Georgia, and since the things that were shot down were airliners, I propose that this article be renamed into 1993 Transair Georgia airliner shootdowns. Opinions? sephia karta 00:10, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename into 1993 Transair Georgia airliner shootdowns 

message: The Tu-154 that was shot down was operating for Orbi Georgian Airways and not Transair Georgia, according to Aviation Safety Network Meltdown627 (talk) 01:15, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aircraft not operating for Transair Georgia? 

message: Since the title of this page caused the cancellation of the Orbi tu-154 shot down, i propose to use another title and return to the previous version of the page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danimusio (talk • contribs) 20:24, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change title into "Sukhumi airliner shootdowns"
Talk:Ming and Ping

message: ming and ping is a single person and thats bao, i worked with him ages ago, why do i feel the need to say this? imagine my surprise that he even had a wikipedia page, who cares.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.23.113.92 (talk) 01:45, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  identity
Talk:TAROM Flight 371

message: one should rename this page to "TAROM Flight 371", as the airline name is typed on its article on Wikipedia: TAROM.
85.186.68.32 (talk) 06:31, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 

message: one should rename this page to "TAROM Flight 371", as the airline name is typed on its article on Wikipedia: TAROM.
85.186.68.32 (talk) 06:33, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 
Talk:Hypo Group Tennis International

message: There is a long, ongoing discussion at WP:Tennis about the tournament tables found in tennis articles on English-language Wikipedia (e.g., this type of table). The discussion is about whether the "official sponsored name" of a tournament - such as Pacific Life Open - or another tournament name without the sponsor - such as Indian Wells Masters - must be used in those articles. Please join the discussion here. Thanks.  Tennis expert (talk) 08:44, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for wider input on discussion at WikiProject Tennis
Talk:Gulf Air Flight 771

message: Can anyone provide a citation or reference to the mention of a theory that Flight 771 was shot down? I was in the Middle East shortly after this and worked with an ATC operator who claimed to have been on duty and to have seen a high speed track intercept the aircraft on the ATC radar. Local authorities then turned up and removed the ATC recordings.
Just off-duty chat, but I always wondered.
Hetribkobs (talk) 22:33, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conspiracy citation? 