lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sterculiaceae

message: I'm mystified by Berton's wholesale reversal of my edits to this article. I contributed new and factual information, with references, which he has deleted. I have tried to edit in such a way as to improve articles but Berton seems to consider this and other articles his personal property, which nobody else should be allowed to edit, improve, or critique in any way. MrDarwin 15:29, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

message: As a rather late addendum to the circumscription issues, I just got a copy of the new "Flowering Plant Families of the World" by Heywood et al.  They maintain Malvaceae in a strict sense, but only by splitting the "core Malvales" rather finely into a series of smaller and narrowly defined families (Bombacaceae, Byttneriaceae, Brownlowiaceae, Durionaceae, Helicteraceae, Malvaceae, Pentapetaceae, Sparrmanniaceae, Sterculiaceae, and Tiliaceae); while the "traditional" core Malvalean families are recognized, they are defined by Heywood et al. much more narrowly than in traditional classifications. MrDarwin 16:26, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Addendum
Talk:Bouzingo

message: This is not a hoax.  This is a little known but important story in the development of the avant-garde and modenrnism.  I will continue to add sources to prove this as true.
Places where one can find the word Bouzingo:
*Mélanges tirés d'une petite bibliothèque romantique: bibliographie anecdotique et pittoresque...
by Charles Asselineau, Théodore Faullain de Banville, Charles Baudelaire - 1866 - 210 pages
*On Bohemia by Cesar Grana, Marigay Grana - 1990 - Chapter: Bouzingos and Jeunes-France pp. 365-369
*Lettre inédite de Philothée O'Neddy [pseud.] auteur de: Feu et flamme, sur le groupe littérai...by Théophile Dondey - 1875
For an excellent social history of Paris in the period under discussion, I sugguest Philip Mansel's "Paris Between Empires 1814-1852."
: Well you should first renamed it as Bousingo (with an "s") or Petit-Cénacle : Pétrus Borel called it camaraderie du Bousingo, as Steinmetz testified it. Yours, --Marc-AntoineV (talk) 16:18, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Transportation in Puerto Rico

message: This article requires alot more information. Mtmelendez 20:25, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Found material that can be used as a sources for historical information about Puerto Rico's transportation systems. Link is here: 
*Pumarada O'Neill, Luis F. (1994). National Register of Historic Places: Historic Bridges of Puerto Rico, c. 1840 - 1950 (NPS Form 10-900-b). United States Department of the Interior National Park Service, 1995.
*Krausz, Sigmund. Transportation In Porto Rico – An Opportunity For The American Capitalist.  Appleton’s Magazine,  New York, etc. D. Appleton etc., 1905.
*Long, W. Rodney. Railways of Central America and the West Indies (second link). Washington: Government Printing Office, 1925. Print.
Some of these are in the public domain, some are not. Please remember to chose carefully between using as a source and copying information altogether when citing them. Remember to be specific as to pages when citing the document. - Mtmelendez (Talk) 00:16, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good source for History section
Talk:Vergilius Vaticanus

message: I have "demoted" David H. Wright, The Vatican Vergil, a Masterpiece of Late Antique Art because, when I wrote the initial article I did not fully understand WP's policies on references. I have not actually seen Wright's book. I did use Calkins and Weitzmann as references. Dsmdgold 15:38, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Spontaneous human combustion controversy

message: I think this article should be deleted:
* It is hopelessly POV. It is just one long argument for SHC.
* The subject is well-covered on Spontaneous_human_combustion. This page doesn't add anything.
* It is hard to see how it would differ from Spontaneous_human_combustion if cleaned up.
* The only article that links here is Spontaneous_human_combustion.
If a more senior Wikipedian agrees, maybe they could propose it for deletion.
220.237.34.36 15:43, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest it is merged in with Spontaneous_human_combustion. The two overlap and are inextricable. Ben Finn 11:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Propose for Merger with Spontaneous human combustion.  This article heavily overlaps with the Spontaneous human combustion article and adds relatively little new information -- all of which could be integrated into that article.  The controversy is an important factor in allowing readers to make conclusions about what Spontaneous human combustion might actually be, and the primary article is an appropriate place for that information.  --DavidGC 06:22, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal -> Spontaneous human combustion
Talk:Skye (disambiguation)

message: Skye (Disambiguation) → Skye – The extra "disambiguation" is unnecessary (and shouldn't be capitalised either, I don't think), since Skye redirects here.
:Have moved per your request. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 16:11, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved it back (but without the capital this time), and made Skye redirect to Isle of Skye with a link from the latter back to here. This seems the most sensible arrangement, as the island is the most common usage of the name. Blisco 14:10, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 15:31, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Hōjō-ji

message: This article is the result of a split-off from Hojujiden, which I had not realized is a different temple altogether. If anyone knowledgable on the subject comes across this, please take a look at both articles and confirm for me that the right info, pertaining to the right temples, is in the right articles. Thank you. LordAmeth 15:50, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Principal protected note

message: I have edited my contributions to remove all non-relevant information. This description of principal protected notes is comparable to the descripts provided under the investment and economics categories such as mutual funds, equities and structured investment products.
Our goal is to contribute factual information about the structured investment category which has grown in significance in response to volatile market conditions over the last five years.  This content has been edited specifically for this use, in agreement with the fair use terms of the Wikipedia environment.   Info@onefinancial.com 15:54, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Please?  Xme - More?</sub></font> (talk) 14:30, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can this man sense
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Regional Health Information Organization

message: I'm unclear what fact or source cited in the article has raised an issue whether that fact/source has been modified to meet a desired POV. While not everything is known about RHIOs it is a given that the US has a health information technology reform effort underway, it has the root causes in high cost and quaility, 150 or more RHIOs have been started, and they are state, local and rural. So, what is the issue that another POV might make? futurekansas 17:09, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Police Federation of England and Wales

message: This article needs thoroughly re-writng. At the moment all it amounts to is an editing of information of the Police Federation website. There are some problematic issues it does not address - 
: 1) The criticism of political interference in the police service when the Federation quite obviously is not adverse to political campaigning itself ie on drugs and pub opening hours.
: 2) The reflex automatic defense of police actions in the face of criticism - as immature as the reflex criticism of the police.
: 3) The absurd status of the Federation itself - statutory body and union in one unholy mix.
IMHO the police would be much better served by being allowed to have a proper independant union, but no govenment will allow that.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Badtypist (talk • contribs) 16:11, 23 February, 2006 (UTC).
: I agree it needs a re-write and have tagged it as such. It's very POV and cites no sources. If I get any time I'll try to do some work to it. With regards to your points above, I could raise exactly the same critisisms of them too... Sapient 22:49, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've re-jigged it all, deleted some non-notable stuff and some very POV bits. Still needs to be balanced out and some sources would be nice too, I guess. Sapient 13:26, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jamshed (neighborhood)

message: The user Fullstop has unilaterally redirected the Jamshed page to Jamshid page. Without even discussing this issue. I have removed the redirect. Please discuss the issue before redirecting any page in the future.
Siddiqui 16:11, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: For the year 2006-07, let us concentrate on upgrading the contents of this page as decided: Wales to upgrade quality of Wiki. Thanks. --Bhadani 14:42, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Let us upgrade
Talk:Yakir Aharonov

message: Currently it is mentioned in the lede that . This seems to be true as of 2023, but is this institution notable? To me it seems like the institution derives most of its notability from Aharonov, and inclusion into lede is too much. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 07:16, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability of IYAR
Talk:Literaturnaya

message: Who on earth would confuse this with Times New Roman? They look nothing alike. —Chowbok 00:55, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're right, but here, in Bulgaria many people make mistakes and they claim that Literaturnaya is Times New Roman. However, I deleted the Literaturnaya vs. Times New Roman section. Stanton BG 16:09, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion

message: The latin characters in the SimSun typeface (distributed by Microsoft with its Windows operating system) looks a bit similar to Literaturnaya. There are also some obvious differences like the capital A. Is there a relation there? // Liftarn
: FounderType, a successful Chinese company specialized in producing fonts and DTP software, decided in 1990s to align its Cyrillic font with some version of Literaturnaya clone; Russian textbooks and exam papers, used in Chinese schools that offer the course, are still printed in this Literaturnaya clone even today. Then Zhongyi (the author of SimSun) imitated FounderType to produce its font for PC without much opposition from the latter, because their designs are different enough to distinguish, while they occupy different niches (one for fine printing and DTP, the other for user interface). Thus, the Latin letters in Simsun slightly resembles Century Old Style, while Cyrillic ones slightly resembles Literaturnaya, both of which are influenced by choices made by FounderType. // Lanlan466, 10 December 2023  — Preceding undated comment added 14:20, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  SimSun 

message: Here is the template parameter for the first image, in the incorrect use:
 | image = 
Here is the template parameter for the first image, in the correct use: 
 | image = Literaturnaya.svg|275px|Literaturnaya
The problem, at least for me, is in the parameter for the second image, the sample:
| sample  = 
This parameter (for sample=) displays correctly, even though it looks just like the incorrect parameter (for image=).  Why is this the situation? --DThomsen8 (talk) 23:43, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the person who wrote the template was too lazy to do the sample parameter properly. The correct use should be |image=Literaturnaya.svg. If non-default sizes are required, there is a separate parameter for that. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 23:59, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox font template problem, shown incorrectly, and correctly

message: The infobox as of 23:06, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox font template used incorrectly 

message: The infobox as of 23:07, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox font template used correctly
Template talk:Africa-ethno-group-stub

message: I propose that we re-word the stub, e.g. "This African ethnic group-related article..." or "This article about an African ethnic group...", etc. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 16:26, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And I see that someone did. Thanks! -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 01:51, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Tropical Storm Clare

message: Why, why does this storm have an article. Look at the figures. It killed no one, the damage is minimal, and it was a tropical storm! There is nothing notable at all for this storm. This storm should be merged, especially given the lack of information of season articles in general. I'll repeat for the 1000th time, what is wrong with adding this new information to the seasonal article? Hurricanehink 22:50, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, this article is not only on a menial storm, it makes no sence. First it says in the infobox that no one died. Then in the impact section, it says ten surfers drowned, then it says two were rescued by police. Any way you say it though, this storm does deserve an article and the info is simply not there, on top of being a very poorly constructed article. Merge it, please. -- §HurricaneERIC§Damagesarchive 00:03, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes, merge this article. A minor storm like this one doesn't deserve a seperate arcticle. Just put the extra information in the seasonal article - Yarrah 13:54, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed error and as far as notability is concerned, this is the only notable storm of the 2005-06 season so far. Storm05 16:46, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because it is the most notable of the season so far doesn't mean it should have an article. Judge the storm, not the season. Hurricanehink 17:18, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, no, I killed it! I'm a murderer! ... RIP Clare. Hurricanehink 17:27, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh oh! It came back from the dead! Guess you're not a murdered after. Don't worry. My axe finished it off...I hope. -- §HurricaneERIC§Damagesarchive 02:23, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Ive restared this and made improvements to it. Storm05 13:22, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've merged it back in, per consensus. Hurricanehink (talk) 14:09, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Restarted
Talk:Jim Leyland

message: POV: "best modern-day manager in baseball" a bit much?  Lou Piniella, Joe Torre, Bobby Cox and othes (Whitey Herzog?) come to mind in addition to LaRussa. And define "modern?"  Often in baseball, "modern" means "after 1900," due to some settling in the organization of the leagues, etc.  After 1950 would be another valid cutoff.  Leyland was definitely in the top 10 managers of the 1990's, Felipe Alou, for example, is also highly regarded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.40.43.141 (talk) 16:34, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - extremely POV (even though I think the author is right).  Should that sentence just be removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Westmt01 (talk • contribs) 04:42, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV?

message: From June 4, 2010 Pregame Tigers at Royals, Kansas City MO.
Image:Leyland 1.JPG
Image:Jim Leyland pregame tigers at royals 2010 06 04.JPG
IMAGE:Jim Leyland pregame tigers at royals 2010 06 04 Face crop.JPG
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Skoch3 (talk • contribs) 14:21, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: A couple Leyland Photos
Talk:Erythrocytosis

message: I was wondering the same thing, but according to Harrison's some people distinguish the two terms: erythrocytosis indicates increased red cell mass and polycythemia refers to an increase in the number of red cells (EPO use etc.). I'm not voting against the merge, just wanted to bring this detail to attention. Also I haven't been able to find this distinction in any other book I have, but since it is Harrison's that reports this info, I find it more relevant. 
We could merge this into polycythemia if "increased red cell mass" is the only thing that can be said about the term. I have no idea what else can be said about erythrocytosis, though (I'm no hematologist). Greets, A. Rad 16:37, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE: merge 

message: I think merging is not a good idea. Because I think there is a real difference between Erythrocytosis and Polycytemia (Vera).
While Erythrocytosis is present in every body but over over exposed in some bodies of good RBC, while Polycytemia (Vera)
is a form caused by a defective DNA structure and need treatment. Excuse my English.
(I'm not a hematologist but that is what understoot from high hematocrite and high hemaglobine concentrations.) 
Thank You
--80.127.42.144 09:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Merge
Talk:Keyence

message: Subsidiary by itself is not notable. Rusf10 (talk) 01:00, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Keyence Corporation of America]] 
Talk:Stanley Cobb

message: Photos can be found at Notable Unitarians: Stanley Cobb and A history of Psychiatry at MGH. I wonder if we could get permission for a copy? --Colin 16:56, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Searching on PubMed produces the expected list of papers on neurology, psychiatry, and bird brains. There are also lots of papers on rheumatoid arthritis. This biography notes that he suffered from arthritis all his adult life, but I can't find any reference that says he researched and published on it. Is this another "S Cobb"?
The article could be improved with some description of his key research findings and papers --Colin 15:42, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Papers
Talk:Bruce Hart (wrestler)

message: Does anyone have any more information about Bruce hart? Thanks. User:MgHoneyBee Apr.4,2006.
I recently just posted all the new information about his interview with the Calagary Sun. There are a few issues I had with posting, one of them is expanding the page FAR right, so you have to scroll. And also I left my reference at the bottom(Buts it's just coming as a hyperlinked [1]. So maybe somebody could help me out?LtColonelBlack 14:08, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Info? 

message: According to his sister Diana's book his full name is Bruce Ambrose Edwardious Hart. Should I edit it? I know that her book, Under The Mat isn't exactly considered to be a particularly reliable source but it seems strange for her to get something like that wrong.*Treker (talk) 04:39, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full name. 
Talk:Solar transition region

message: Request: information about the thickness (actually, the relative thinness!) of the transition region would be appropriate, e.g., 100 km cited at solar.physics.montana.edu/ypop/Spotlight/SunInfo/Transregion.html‎ --- I didn't cite this because I'd like a better reference.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.38.185.102 (talk) 16:16, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:U.N. Spacy

message: I've got to tell you, I find the translation "U.N. Spacy" to be...well, "spacey", if you know what I mean.
Well, what would a "space navy" be other than a "spacy." It seems to me that terms like "spacy," and "spaceman" (instead of seaman) sound odd to us because of the very fact they are science-fiction. Perhaps in the future, if/when space travel is far more widely spread, these terms will be seen as normal and everyday.
---
Shouldn't "spacy" (lit. "space forces") be a portmanteau (or just a blend) of "space" and "navy"? What has "army"/rikugun got to do with it? -- creamyhorror, June 08  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.197.41 (talk) 18:46, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First header
Talk:Circe chess

message: I've tried to fix some ambiguities in the variants.  However, a few things remain unclear:
# The phrase "initial square" occurs often.  Does it mean the square on which that individual piece actually started, or the rebirth square according to the circe rules?  And when it talks of the initial square of the capturing piece, does it mean the square on the capturer's side or the captured's side?
# Circe Parrain: "If the godfather move is castling, then the rebirth-move is a King move followed by a Rook move (so that O-O as godfather-move usually leads to an occupied square)."   It took me a moment to figure out the unusual condition.  It also doesn't address the question of what happens if the godfather move takes the rebirth square off the board - does it wrap round, or is the piece not reborn at all?
# Clone circe: What happens if the capturing piece is a king?  Is the captured piece reborn as itself, or what?
# Diagram circe: What diagram?  Does it mean that a diagram is given as the initial position (as in a problem), and rebirth occurs according to it?
-- Smjg 17:05, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article at http://www.chessvariants.org/difftaking.dir/circe.html answers the "initial square" questions very thoroughly, both for the original and the Progressive variation. However, I decline to edit the article, because I don't think I'd do a good job in this case. GeorgeTSLC (talk) 04:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

text: And I'm confused about Martian circe.  It seems to be just standard chess with an added restriction that only a piece that is on its starting square may capture.  How is this a variant of circe?  And what does "if it is unoccupied" mean?  That if the capturing piece's initial square is occupied the piece may capture from anywhere, but if it's clear the piece captures as if it was on the initial square at the beginning of the move? — Smjg (talk) 13:46, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarifications needed 

message: The black king wouldn't be able to take the rook anyway, because of the white pawn 'guarding' it. Unless the rules for pawns capturing changes in circe chess?130.95.106.154 02:36, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: White's moving up the board. Usual convention in game diagrams. 62.136.137.117 14:02, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Example
Talk:Sunday People

message: The trip-hop band here might not be notable, and in any case does not have an article. All pages linking here mean the newspaper, so I have been bold and redirected it to reflect this. If someone decides to create an article on the band in future, then since "Sunday People" is far better known (at least in the English-speaking world) as a former name for the newspaper, I would recommend creating it at Sunday People (band) and putting 
 
at the top of that article. Hairy Dude 17:12, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Daft Punk Is Playing at My House

message: Removed from article:
"*This song is now a major remix(1K+ downloads) on legal torrents."
I'm not sure what this actually means - I'm presuming Bittorrent, but I don't think it's been released legally in any form as a torrent. Anyone know? Secretlondon 17:14, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I swear I first saw this song on TV with the title 'Dat Funk is Playing at my House', I wonder if there was some kind of copyright reason why they couldn't use the name Daft Punk or something.  Does anyone else remember this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Liquidcow (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dat Funk? 

message: There's no music video section on this article, 
But shouldn't there be one?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.209.119.70 (talk) 23:26, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music Video? 

message: But did Daft Punk actually play at his house?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.121.10.252 (talk) 19:09, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did it happen? 

message: As this page probably isn't trafficked that much, I'll probably end up fixing this myself, but how exactly is the video for "Daft Punk is Playing at My House" referencing Spike Jonze's video for "Da Funk"? The only thing in common is the fact that both videos take place in New York. As New York is probably the most filmed city in the world, I feel this hardly qualifies. In fact, "Da Funk" was probably filmed in Manhattan, while "Daft Punk is Playing at My House" is probably filmed in Brooklyn. So far, I'm unconvinced. Damienivan (talk) 22:46, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  References Spike Jonze's "Da Funk" Video?