Talk:National Gold Bank Note

message: This article is being linked to by other pages in progress and is being tested in the articles in progress.
:The deleted version had zero contents - except a . This are clearly speedy deletion candidates, and have been and will be deleted on sight. However now the article HAS contents, though not much yet and which needs to be wikified, but now it's no longer a speedy deletion candidate anymore. andy 11:10, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to reiterate what Andy has already said in that there is no need to delete this article now that it has content and anyone who does is breaking wikipedia guidelines.  Just putting the  message in and nothing else is grounds for speedy deletion but this is not the case here.  In future if you are in the process of working on a page and would like others to leave it alone until you have finished, you can put the  tag into the main body of the article until you have finished, though this should normally only be used for an outside maximum of a few hours. -- Francs2000 | Talk  15:50, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past Discussion 

message: I would not recommend the merge as The Gold certificate article lacks any references. National Gold Bank notes were in response to the California Gold Rush. While the series Gold Certificates of 1882 were the first for regular circulation.Knowledgekid87 19:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The suggestion seems dead, but I would like to add that it would be a horrible idea to merge an article on NGBN with one on Gold Certs - they are very different types of notes.  The former were part of the National Banking System and the latter were representative money like the Silver Certs.LondonYoung (talk) 20:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember I had agreed on that and just dropped the proposal it was bot added anyways. It was kind of like combining apples with oranges there. Knowledgekid87 19:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I would be inclined to trust the Friedbergs here as they are the ones who came up with the Friedberg numbering system., ,  ("The world buys and sells paper money by Friedberg numbers") Can anyone provide more evidence that a #1,000 National Gold Bank was indeed printed but never released outside of the parroted origin source? Just to compare, the $500 note is mentioned as F-1166a despite there being no notes known. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the citation, the $1,000 NGBN is mentioned in the 19th edition of Friedberg.  I don't own the book, but my guess is that the note lacks an Fr number because it was never circulated.  The $500 note was circulated, and therefore has been assigned an Fr number, despite the lack of known survivors. - ZLEA T\C 14:27, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: $1,000 bill is not mentioned by Friedberg

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:US-NBN-CA-San Francisco-1741-1870-5-6758-B.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for July 17, 2020. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2020-07-17. Any improvements or maintenance to this article should be made before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:47, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:US-NBN-CA-San Francisco-1741-1870-5-6758-B.jpg]] scheduled for POTD 

message: Have a entire set for sell 2600:1700:DD3:DA90:CD75:FB5C:7977:98FE (talk) 14:02, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who buy these