Talk:Roger Craig Smith

message: Okay no offense but certain users I encounter they usually say "yes resume is allowed" but here you neglect stuff, besides I am sick and tired of every users belief's and preferences, I thought EVERYTHING has to have A SOURCE.
Now don't get me started, since I had experienced/faced with users such as TheFarix & Cyphoidbomb, since they were very rude and very unflexible unnlike the rest of you. Now back with Roger Craig Smith I'm sorry but what is seriously going on with this page. All what I was doing was trying to find all the sources for the roles to play with, and to be honest it is HARD to find every source on which character he plays. I just never expect that finding everyone of his roles via source is that hard. Finally, I can't believe I'm flattered that you can reject sites like youtube, comicbook sites, HIS own website with his roles on his resume. 
Look I'm sorry If I'm going through this long rant but this has gone far enough!. We need to find a solution and resolve this fiasco mess regarding on his filmography.--98.196.41.58 (talk) 01:45, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. Everything does need a source. But it has to be a reliable source. That means no primary sources, which his resume would be. Additionally, a good amount of the sources used are questionable at best. As well, adding a laundry list of roles (again, as Cyphoid stated, we are NOT iMDb) hoping others come along to source them is not how editing works on Wikipedia. It is the content adders burden to also provide the source that stated that content. (Again a reliable source). You can not expect other users to know where you got such information, or to find the sources for you. We had this problem back in November 2013. It was taken care of then, and will continue to be so if others try to readd content like that. On sources, YouTube is acceptable only if it is coming from a reliable source's channel (ie IGN's, AP, etc.); comic book sites are very much reliable - IGN, Comic Book Resources, Newsarama, ComicsAlliance, GameInformer - those are some of the main ones. His site is not (as stated) because of WP:PRIMARY. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 06:12, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the info Favre1fan93, then again for some of his other roles he played whether it be video games, anime, original animation, etc.... it will be a tough road to find each source. But I'll keep it in touch. ;)--98.196.41.58 (talk) 13:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmography section for Roger Craig Smith 

message: Here is a tweet where Smith has commented on this infobox image. --Tito Dutta (talk) 00:23, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Tito, I'm not clear on the relevance to the article, except for amusement purposes. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:39, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The current image seems to be a cropped one  and the only image we have on Commons. If additional free images are found those may be upload on Commons or used in this article after discussion. --Tito Dutta (talk) 03:47, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Cropped images are preferred if they highlight the subject—it doesn't make sense to show an entire discussion panel if we're interested in one person. There's no obvious reason to change it, except that the subject tweeted a general self-deprecating comment about it. Not sure why we would entertain a change based on that. If there's another rationale for change, I'd be interested in hearing it. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:04, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subject's tweet on infobox image