lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ashford–Ramsgate line

message: I took the WP:TRAIL diagram to Margate, as from what little i can find out, it appears the services on this line (and maybe the Kent Coast Line) run to here, rather than Ramsgate (where one can argue the line rather than service strictly terminates). Of course I'm more to than welcome to change it, if someone can show that Margate isn't the terminus of these services and Ramsgate is. Pickle 03:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extent 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Ashford to Ramsgate (via Canturbury West) line and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 14#Ashford to Ramsgate (via Canturbury West) line until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:52, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ashford to Ramsgate (via Canturbury West) line" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Is there no source we can use for the length of this line as well as the mileages of its stations, crossings and junctions? --  Denelson83  21:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mileage
Talk:Airlangga University

message: This university ranks well in the Times Higher Ed supplement rankings (see Melanesian rankings), I'm surprised there isn't more text here? Natebailey 11:41, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Well ranked - short article? 
Talk:Bexleyheath line

message: Well done to all those that have converted the map into the latest template style. However, I foresee a problem, which is that the map now dominates the article.  It seem to me to be a case of the "tail wagging the dog", so-to-speak. I have noticed that some pictures can be made smaller, a placed in a "frame", to make it fit nicely on the page. If one wants to look at an enlargement, then clicking the picture opens up a new window where the full-size picture can be looked at.  I just wonder whether this might be a "solution" to the problem of the large map. Not sure how it might be implemented, but its the concept that I am trying to sell. Olana North (talk) 11:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Map
Talk:Dartford Loop Line

message: Can we have the route map redone to look like this ish:
: Charing Cross
::::: Cannon Street
: R i v e r   T h a m e s 
: Waterloo East
: L o n d o n   B r i d g e
: etc
as opposed to 
: Charing Cross
: River Thames 
: Waterloo East
::::: Cannon Street
::::: River Thames
: L o n d o n   B r i d g e
: etc
Jake the Editor Man  (talk) 21:04, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: smiler (talk) 17:15, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: Also regarding the map, it shows the DLR tracks as passing under the SEML/Dartford Loop Line at Lewisham. In fact, the DLR station is to the NE of the DLL, and the track passes underneath the North Kent/Bexleyheath Line platforms. For reference: http://maps.google.co.uk/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&hl=en&msa=0&ll=51.465398,-0.013561&spn=0.003676,0.006802&t=h&z=17&msid=115773038291859454834.00047b543ec2e18cf08e7
:smiler (talk) 17:15, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lewisham DLR arrangement
Talk:Queen's Hospital

message: Are we allowed to highlight a NHS facility's know problems, MRSA rates, etc? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.34.37.173 (talk • contribs).
:Yes, but there needs to be citations from reliable sources. MRSC • Talk 12:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems

message: I have been visiting my wife in the hospital now for more than 8 weeks.
I have been there for approx 8 to 12 hours a day.
--
"We have XX(so many) other patients" is the most common statement for avoiding work.
This is the most common comment I have received during my long term visits.
It can take up to 8 hours (no joke) for Grade A staff to reach the bedside.
I feel honoured if it takes less than 2 hours.
The sister claimed ths does not happen..
Unfortunately it does.
The night staff are especially lazy.
They will do anything to avoid changing a nappy.
Most of the other comments are "it will be done,.. we are doing it"
When lives are at stake, the question is:-  "before or after the funeral?"
-- 
We really need a queuing system which is transparant to the patient.
Why is it taking the staff so long to reach the patient?
What are the staff doing?
Are they simply avoiding work, or are they really busy with "other priorities"?
How can we tell?
How about an electronic ticket system?
Who is next in the queue?
82.7.217.7 14:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "We have other patients to look after"
Talk:Marshlink line

message: Is it a stopper from Hasting to Ashford *AND* a fast from Brighton to Ashford, or something else ??? Pickle 17:23, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Serivces
Talk:Roger E. Combs

message: I apologize to those wikipedians who see general officers as WP:NOTABLE lacking the notability necessary for inclusion.  I strongly disagree, and see detailed biographies as a way to provide new information for actuarial science, among many other purposes.  A new template is included Template:PDT-USGov-Military-Army.  Please advise/edit if this template can be improved. Thanks for your help! JPatrickBedell 14:11, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: not a concern just need to say I didn't know him but I do know his daughter Susan and she is a great smart lady and I so sure with a father like Roger he had alot to do with it❤ 67.82.10.88 (talk) 02:00, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  # pancakesforRoger#
Talk:Worshipful Company of Goldsmiths

message: from article - 
The Company was originally responsible for hallmarking platinum, gold and silver
To state that it originallyhallmarked these metals implies that hallmarking was done from the companies inception in the 1300's. However platinum finds reference in English in the mid 1500's. Wording should be adjusted to clarify that it was originally responsible for gold and silver , and then at a later date hallmarking of platinum. SauliH 14:13, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Platinum hallmarking

message: :Category:Great Twelve City Livery Companies is itself a category within :Category:Livery companies. — Robert Greer (talk) 00:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Livery companies]] ''vs.'' [[:Category:Great Twelve City Livery Companies]]  

message: Would anyone be interested in helping to set up a WikiProject Silverware? I'm interested in salvers, coffee pots, jugs, candlesticks, famous silversmiths, different styles, etc. Thanks. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 11:38, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Setting up WikiProject Silverware? 

message: The bis.gov link has failed - what should it be now? Jackiespeel (talk) 18:49, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: Could someone help fix the info template on this page? It seems to have been updated but info isn't showing. (Yunzu19 (talk) 14:06, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info Template fix
Talk:Conjoint analysis (marketing)

message: removed affinnova
Affinnova had added a new section marked as "alternatives to conjoint analysis" which was almost pure advertising and not relevant to conjoint analysis. Only a single link to named unbranded alternative techniques was needed, since they had been generously left in before, this was taking it too far
16:16, 11 June 2007
minor edits to affinnova line.
full disclosure: the original line added by 12.110.141.194 is an Affinnova company IP.  I am a former Affinnova employee.  I thought about moving this into it's own "Alternatives" or "Related Analytical Techniques" heading, but since it's only one sentence, left it where it is.
Coldnebo 14:13, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As noted in the article the term conjoint analysis in marketing research reads on all methods of measurement of perceived value.  This article needs a fair presentation of the full range of methods particularly those classified as explicit or compositional.  Without such a discussion, this article implies that the complex full-profile derived methods of measurement of perceived value are preferred if not the only approach available.  In its present form the article is more of an advertisement than a learned discussion.  Note that the software for all of the methods discussed are provided by a single mentioned supplier. 
The classical conjoint methods such as full-profile conjoint and new derivatives such as Choice-Based-Conjoint are decompositional where the feature values are determined based on the rating, ranking or selection of hypothetical combinations of features.  Feature value or its impact is obtained through regression analysis.  Explicit and compositional methods which are much older, are based on the direct rating, ranking or selection of features.  These methods are typically simpler, cheaper, and more robust than decompositional methods.  All perceive value measures however have disadvantages.  The decompositional method are believed to be more accurate and are able to handle a broader range of types of features than compositional methods.  As in the case of decompositional methods there has be an extensive development explicit and compositional approaches including alternative methods of measurement such as MaxDiff (mentioned in the article) and compositional conjoint and several new forms of profiling including Adaptive Simalto , Simalto II, and Design-Your-Own-Product. 76.98.244.23 (talk) 22:01, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of Explicit and Compositional Methods
Talk:Bearsted railway station

message: The name of the village is Bearsted. Isn't this also the name of the railway station?--Oldontarian (talk) 16:05, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes - what's the problem here? --Redrose64 (talk) 16:54, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The title of the article on the village names it as Bearstead. --Oldontarian (talk) 19:17, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I take it that you mean this article? The title of that article is spelled the same as the title of this one. There is no inconsistency. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:51, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station Name
Talk:Canterbury West railway station

message: PortholePete (talk) 14:47, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  1979 and the centre lines
Talk:Deal railway station

message: Why does this article need a section on accidents whose only connection with this station is incidental?
First, the Lewisham rail crash: apparently at least one person was from Deal. Four problems here: (i) why is this information of note; (ii) it's sourced to O.S. Nock's Historic Railway Disasters - I have Nock's book, and Lewisham 1957 is on p.164 - but Nock does not state where any of the victims came from, least of all anyone from Deal; (iii) if they were from Deal, presumably they lived in a house and not in the station, so if notable, it should be mentiond at Deal, Kent and not at Deal railway station; (iv) where were the other 80+ people from, and why are they not mentioned on the articles for their home towns too?
Second, the Sevenoaks railway accident - this also is in Nock (p.107), he states that the train was "the 5pm from Cannon Street to Folkestone", he also states that it was to run via Ashford, but does not mention either Minster or Deal. So again, why is this relevant to an article on Deal railway station? --Redrose64 (talk) 12:21, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I fully agree, and have removed the section. Convention is that it is for accidents and incidents occurring at or neat the station that the article covers. Mjroots (talk) 09:40, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accidents
Talk:East Farleigh railway station

message: Does anyone know why the station is staggered the way it is? Staggered stations are usually (so far as I can see) arranged so that when a train is at a platform, the gates are behind it and can be opened for traffic. East Farleigh is built the other way round, with the result that for trains in either direction the traffic has to wait during both the approach and the standing time. I can't think of another one like this. I was there the other day and was puzzled. Peridon (talk) 10:35, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Staggering
Talk:Farningham Road railway station

message: I discovered a reference to  a private platform belonging to the Farningham School for little boys - which is now no longer existent but the site is now occupied by Southdown Retirement Village Lawrence18uk (talk) 18:08, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Private school station to East?
Talk:Wiki (disambiguation)

message: You are telling me of ALL things that Wikipedia itself is not listed on this page?
I think the part that says "wiki wiki" was made popular by a Will Smith song should also include the much more popular and earlier recording by Newcleus "Jam On It" where Smith undoubtedly got it from.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.20.196.231 (talk) 22:50, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are you serious? 

message: This article is one of a  number selected for the early stage of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue   are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.
The following request appears on that page:
Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Pending changes"  would be appreciated.
Please update the Queue page as appropriate.
Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially
Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 00:38, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pending changes

message: Please add .wiki as a dot point under the "In technology" section.
*.wiki, a generic top-level domain overseen by ICANN.
--110.20.243.197 (talk) 02:17, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Stickee (talk) 01:05, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  .wiki generic top-level domain 

message: Shouldn't Wiki (disambiguation) have a link directly to the Wikia article?  --72.85.59.12 (talk) 05:05, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Why should it? Reach Out to the Truth 19:02, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the names are nearly identical (unlike some of the things which are on the Wiki (disambiguation) page), and Wikia is so closely related to Wikis that anyone who needs the disambiguation page might not realize that the terms are not interchangeable.  Like someone who does not realize a droid is not always the same as an android, or the difference between cola and Coca-Cola and Coke. --OP, AKA 71.121.143.2 (talk) 05:27, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikia 

message: There is an American rapper and record producer called Wiki, who has an article in Wikipedia under Wiki (rapper). Should he be included in this list somewhere? Vorbee (talk) 07:44, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki (rapper)

message: One of the origins of the huge success of this Wikimedia project can be found in the WikiWiki software application. Even when it's shortened in Wiki, people nowadays often think of wiki as something from the Wikimedia Foundation. For historical resosn, and paying tribute to the pioneers of the open and collaborative WWW, here also should WikiWiki be mentioned. Maybe like this; WikiWIki or Wiki. In the early days this article page was called WikiWiki, see  web.archive.org, wikipedia.com, WikiWiki  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeriodicT (talk • contribs) 17:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiWiki
Talk:Folkestone West railway station

message: The article states several times that the station is visited by the VSOE, but the only reference here is a dead link, and there's nothing on the VSOE website to say it stops here. Does anyone have a source, or should the claim be removed? Moonraker12 (talk) 10:48, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Pretty sure that it passes through. Whether it stops or not is a different matter. --Redrose64 (talk) 10:53, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: From personal experiance, I know it was there last weekend. Passengers detrain and catch a coach to France via Eurotunnel. However, that's OR. Edgepedia (talk) 11:05, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

text: Seat61 the journey like (scroll down to crossing the channel) Edgepedia (talk) 11:15, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orient Express?
Talk:Ham Street railway station

message: I've added information about the new TVM and the removal of the PERTIS machines at Ham Street station. Martin H. Heron (talk) 19:56, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Please reference it, per the policy on verifiability. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:49, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

text: How do I reference real life experience? Shall I get some photographs? Martin H. Heron (talk) 21:19, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The thing is, Wikipedia doesn't record real-life experience: Wikipedia summarises what others have already written on the subject. If a newspaper, or railway-related magazine, has written about this type of ticket machine and has done so in connection with Ham Street station, it may be mentioned provided that it is also sourced to that periodical. --Redrose64 (talk) 13:22, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem I have is that on the grand scheme of things, this TVM is a small part of the railway and I doubt it would have been written about. However, in the terms of Ham Street station, a new TVM is important. I have a photograph of the TVM, is it useless now or shall I upload it? Edit: I have now found a link to 'Southern News', which is a Southern Railway newsletter, which briefly mentions the new TVM at Ham Street station. http://www.southernrailway.com/download/10892.7/nps-newsletter-2-east-coast Martin H. Heron (talk) 11:29, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The TOC's own newsletter isn't an independent third-party source. --Redrose64 (talk) 13:44, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Ticket Vending Machine 

message: I've added some increased information about connections from Ashford International. Martin H. Heron (talk) 19:59, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Please reference it, per the policy on verifiability. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:49, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

text: Done. Thank you. Martin H. Heron (talk) 21:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Southeastern High Speed 
Talk:Headcorn railway station

message: Why is this station under the list of disused stations in Kent? — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeorgeBurgess24 (talk • contribs) 10:59, 7 February 2014‎
:Assuming that you mean it's in , I think that's for the former K&ESR station which was adjacent to the present-day station. --Redrose64 (talk) 12:01, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Disused station
Talk:Glennon Engleman

message: If your him please explain where the information you added came form. Please use sources when possible...173.180.214.13 (talk) 08:48, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  User:121.217.56.56 

message: If he has 7 victims at separate events, shouldn't he be in "American serial killers" category? He meets the criteria.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.231.2.255 (talk) 16:26, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serial killer?
Talk:Neddylation

message: As it stands this article is completely innacurate. The adition of Nedd8 to proteins does not direct them to the proteasome, and indeed in many cases the role of Nedd8 is uncharcterised. However in, for example, the neddylation of Cullin3 promotes its activity, possibly through dimerisation. I will be tagging the whole article as disputed and will also remove some of the most obviously innacurate 'facts.' To be honest, I recommend creating a new article, 'Nedd8' and redirecting Neddylation to point to that, bringing the article in line with ubiquitin/ubiquitination and SUMO/SUMOylation. (Sorry, forgot to sign)--JamesGlover 14:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed
Talk:Hoo Junction

message: There is a reference in the Crossrail article (the schematic) to Hoo Junction, but it is not mentioned here. Could someone add an update to reflect it? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 13:22, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crossrail 

message: Anyone know? Paul, in Saudi (talk) 11:33, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of the Name?
Talk:Singida Region

message: As Singida is a town, a region and a district, maybe this should be distinguished via a disambiguation page. sw:User:Oliver Stegen
I support Oliver's suggestion. AliFazal 18:51, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Goo 197.152.116.115 (talk) 10:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singida
Talk:Martin Mill railway station

message: I removed this statement, as it asked questions rather than stated anything:
How it managed to suddenly arrive from the top of the cliffs to the botom is something to think about however a chalk cutting was cut out fo the side of the cliff for the line to pass down.
Anyone have any information?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Edgepedia (talk • contribs) 10:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed 
Talk:Minster railway station

message: I don't think services from Sandwich go to Sturry, I'm sure they reverse at Minster and go to Ramsgate. That's what the announcements say on the trains. Doomotron (talk) 07:11, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This is correct. Page 13 of the current Southeastern timetable shows the 14:38 from Ashford International doing exactly that, meeting at Sandwich at 15:50, Minster at 16:02 and Ramsgate at 16:13. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:39, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Services
Talk:Caper story

message: Does Arsene Lupin qualify?  Should he be mentioned and linked here?
:If Bernie Rhodenbarr qualifies, so does his ancestor Lupin--also their British cousin, A.J. Raffles.  However, none of them are, to my way of thinking, fully a part of this subgenre, since they work alone, and don't plan elaborate heists.  Their various thefts are not really the main point of the stories.  I see no harm in mentioning Lupin and Raffles, but they should perhaps be distinguished in some way--as early prototypes, in a sense.Xfpisher (talk) 20:31, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

message: The whole article should be deleted. It's just one person's opinion without a single reference.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.17.195.227 (talk) 11:02, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garbage
Talk:Sheppey Light Railway

message: Examining photos, the line appears to run some distance south of Eastchurch, much closer to the former RAF Eastchruch. This is also the location noted for the Eastchrust railway station. This being the case, where did the spur into the RAF station run? It is not longer evident on the photos. Maury Markowitz (talk) 11:47, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Path through Eastchurch
Category talk:Villages in Kent

message: Minster on Sea (Minster village)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.26.243.228 (talk) 19:28, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

message: It should be noted that a great many of the places named on this list are not strictly speaking villages - they are often just names on the map, scarcely even hamlets. It is unfortunate that a great deal of effort has been put into starting articles by taking the list mentioned at the head of this Category, withgout checking whether the places named are villages or not. Consequently we now have dozens (?) of articles saying "XXX is village in Kent" and nothing else. I suppose it adds to the number of articles written by the editor concerned, but makes for nonsense reading when no further information is added, as is usually the case, since it gives no locational or other information. Having spent a long time writing articles on Kent, and trying to be accurate, I find this extremely annoying. Peter Shearan (talk) 07:14, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not all the places are villages