lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Frankie Jaxon

message: Dick Spottswood hosts a weekly radio show in the Washington DC area known as the "obsolete music hour", and among his listener's favorites is is "Christ Was Born on Christmas Morn", by Frankie half pint Jaxson and the Cotton Top Mountain Sanctified Singers.  Spottswood claims that he receives more e-mail about this song than any other. Persons interested in Frankie Jaxson should make a point of hearing the song at least once.  -- Hadrian Swall (talk) 20:55, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled comments 

message: This source states - on the basis of "the author’s recent research" - that he was born on March 3, 1897, with the name Frank Devera Jackson - as shown on an application for a military headstone in 1953.  That may be plausible, but I'm not convinced that is necessarily the same person.  Most previous sources - like this and this - give the date of birth of this article's subject as February 3 (different month), 1895 (different year), and his name as Jaxon not Jackson.  What has convinced Brian Berger that his research - which seems to be based on one military card - is more reliable than previous research?  At least, I think our article should be less certain about the possibilities, and give credence to different sources rather than simply assuming that Berger's research findings are correct.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 19:37, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Eagle and LeBlanc give similar information, I see, so I'll tweak the text a little. Ghmyrtle (talk) 13:04, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name and date of birth 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 04:59, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase

message: Article says "Other names in common use include PTEN, MMAC1, and phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphohydrolase. PTEN also refers to a member of the class, phosphatase and tensin homolog." but I think this is wrong. 
It seems (reading the various articles) that PTEN is a gene, phosphatase and tensin homolog is the specific protein it encodes, which is one of the class of Phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatases. OK to say that  ? - Rod57 (talk) 19:56, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion or error
Talk:Lynn Wyatt

message: With all due respect to Lynn Wyatt, why isn't this page being held to the standards of the pages of other living people?  Most of it sounds like a press release.  Again no disrespect intended towards Lynn Wyatt.24.167.105.97 (talk) 19:44, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article read, "Ukrainian immigrants Tobias Sakowitz and brother Simon founded Sakowitz Bros. specialty department store in 1902, in Galveston, Texas."  Tobias and Simon Sakowitz were not Ukrainian immigrants.  At best, that is a geographical anachronism.  At worst, it's whitewashing their ethnic heritage. 
1) There was no independent Ukraine when Tobias immigrated to the United States in 1897.  Most of the Ukrainian lands were part of the Russian Empire at that time.  The remaining lands were part of Austria-Hungary.  The Sakowitzes simply could not have been Ukrainian by citizenship.  (Their hometown, Korostyshiv [a.k.a. Korosteschev], was inside the Russian Empire, in the Volhynian Governorate.)
2) The Sakowitz were Jewish, which in that region, at that time, was understood as a religious affiliation and an ethnicity--both by Jews and others.  The Sakowitzes were not ethnically Ukrainian, and no one would have regarded them as such.
Poldy Bloom (talk) 03:10, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: "Ukrainian immigrants"
Talk:South Kent School

message: Having attended SKS, I know that the school provides individualized instruction to every student.  As someone who has consulted with hundreds of schools, I can tell you that not one comes close to matching the resources and caliber of teaching available at SKS. Jamesdcornelius (talk) 11:58, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

message: It is great what the school is doing for these players. It is a shame, however, as it has almost entirely forgot about the rest of its students. 64.89.151.244 (talk) 21:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Basketball

message: The History section formerly was based on this page that is no longer on the school website: http://web.archive.org/web/20070728014730/http://www.southkentschool.net/pages/sitepage.cfm?id=5 --Orlady (talk) 17:15, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, yes, that's true. But OTOH it's also a direct copy-paste. Best, Markvs88 (talk) 17:49, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but if someone wants to rewrite it in their own words, that's the source to cite. --Orlady (talk) 17:54, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Source for History

message: I'm removing this entire section. If the external links are useful they can be added as refs, but we don't need a section to serve as an online scrapbook of every mention of the school. Meters (talk) 23:37, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fine.  I've added-back as ExRefs, as per your suggestion.   Thanks for helping me learn!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ethnic laundry (talk • contribs) 19:25, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: And thewy have been removed again, by another editor. I said they could be used as references if they are useful, not as external links. It's not appropriate to list articles simply because they mention the school. Meters (talk) 20:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: They also seem irrelevant to me (I only skimmed them). They're mostly outdated articles about the schools achievements (covered), articles about individual students (irrelevant), and the Youtube link is superseded by the official website. Deunanknute (talk) 20:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent Media Stories About South Kent
Talk:World of Outlaws: Sprint Cars 2002

message: Hi. I changed the developer of this game back to Ratbag as that was the name of the company when it was released. I realise that ratbag was bought out by midway who then sold the studio to Krome etc, but it was ratbag who developed the game. A good example of why we should keep it as ratbag is Colony Wars. This was developed by Psygnosis, who were bought out by Sony to become Sony Liverpool. The developer for this game is labeled as Psygnosis and not Sony Liverpool as thats what it says on the box.
I have made the same change for 2 of the other games that were changed from Ratbag to Krome.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sequal1 (talk • contribs) 13:28, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I correct myself. It definitely should be Ratbag as Krome never bought them out, they just hired a lot of the ex ratbag staff after they shut down by Midway. Sequal1 (talk) 14:08, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Developer
Talk:Phosphoinositide phospholipase C

message: Is there really a difference between Phospholipase C and Phosphoinositide phospholipase C? Mikael Häggström (talk) 20:22, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there are differences. We could merge bacterial and eukaryotic phospholipases C from CL0384, but we also have Zinc-dependent phospholipase C which are very different. My very best wishes (talk) 19:55, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

text: I agree. They are classified as two distinct enzymes: EC 3.1.4.3 (phospholipase C) and 3.1.4.11	(phosphoinositide phospholipase C). --Dcirovic (talk) 23:52, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elvis Presley

message: Hello all Elvismania. First forgive my poor english, I speak french, I'm from Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Did you know that Viva Las Vegas was made BEFORE Kissin' Cousins but released after. The fact is that after Viva Las Vegas has been ended, Elvis begin the movie Kissin' Cousins and the producer was Gene Nelson, a fast-movie specialist. To make Kissin' Cousins took only 18 days. After that, Viva Las Vegas wasn't yet released on the screens. A problem occurred. The Big Bosses in Hollywood told that they couldn't release the 2 at the same time, Elvis could'nt compete(go) against Elvis, they would lose big money. They saw the 2 movies and decided that, for them, Kissin' Cousins is a better movie than Viva Las Vegas, so they released Kissin' Cousins first. For the fanatics of Elvis, you can see the light change in Elvis hairs from Fun in Acapulco --> Viva Las Vegas --> Kissin' Cousins --> Roustabout is fluid(normal). I mentioned that because I didn't read that in neither of your two movie wiki articles. Thanks for reading me. --Danielvis08 (talk) 15:56, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viva Las Vegas vs Kissin' Cousins 

message: Hi there, I have introduced the List of music museums. There remain seven Elvis' museums unwritten, that mainly have an article in another language:
*  (2011–2013),  – Düsseldorf, Germany
* , partly  – Friedberg, Germany
* ,  – Hawera, New Zealand
* The King's Ransom MuseumLas Vegas Sun, Elvis Presley: A love affair, 14 February 2010 – Las Vegas, USA
*  – Pigeon Forge, USA
* ,  – Molkwerum, Netherlands
* ,  – Culemborg, Netherlands
* Memphis Mansion, Randers, has been written today by me for this project.
Are there people interested in writing one or all of these unwritten museums in English? It would help your project as well as the List of music museums a lot! (in case you are willing to write the first five, I will translate the latter two from Dutch, which is my maternal language) Hopefully you will!  Ymnes (talk) 16:44, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elvis' museums on the [[List of music museums]] 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Linda Thompson (actress)#Requested move 19 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:53, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Linda Thompson (actress)#Requested move 19 February 2024]]
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured list proposal

message: This is a new proposed design for displaying a "Today's featured list" section on the main page.
It uses a self-contained template that bypasses the need to create subpages.  The schedule of pages to be displayed is listed on the template itself, and presents Featured Lists in roughly the same order that they were granted featured list status.  Lists about very similar subjects were separated by a few days, to keep the presentation varied.
The star in the upper right-hand corner needs to be hidden, but that's easy to do.
The Transhumanist    21:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal #6 

message: What do you think?  What adjustments are needed?  The Transhumanist    21:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No me gusta. I would much rather it be a simple box, with perhaps 5 entries from the featured list with a link reading something like, "See more of this Featured List" or something. The scroll box puts way too much on the Main Page. Notice we don't throw the entire Featured Article up there? Mahalo. --Ali'i 22:22, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please also note that the Featured List star is being transcluded, too. --Agüeybaná (talk) 22:34, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments and suggestions please 

message: Hi folks, I regularily close and promote FLs, and currently there is a rather large backlog. Some FLCs that have been open for 3 weeks only have 2 comments and there are about a dozen that have been there for more than 10 days that I can't close due to a lack of comments. So if some of you would like to go there and look at a few of them and possibly vote, it would be much appreciated. Thanks, Scorpion0422 02:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FLC]]

message: To anyone who is curious about this sixth proposal for a Today's featured list and trying to look at the page history to see what it looked like:
This proposal was highly dependent on the now-deleted  (see that deletion discussion). It enabled the Main Page section to transclude the entire page of the featured list into a scroll box. After  was deleted, the proposal no longer functioned, and thus the page history was deleted as per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Main Page alternative (TFL). Zzyzx11 (Talk) 21:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Roger L. Stevens (version 2)

message: Note on what I have done:
this was originally a redirect to the list of recipients of the Kennedy Center Honors; there apparently was no article for the person, Roger L. Stevens. 
I made a new article at Roger L. Stevens (producer) on 11/26/07, and I think this should redirect to the substantive article, which is what I have now done. Hopefully this is all good! JeanColumbia (talk) 21:29, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured list

message: Would it be possible to remove List of Interstate Highways in Washington from the queue? I was hoping to nominate it for a time-specific slot in September 2023 to coincide with an anniversary. SounderBruce 23:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll swap it out the next time I go to schedule a list (probably on Friday). Giants2008 (Talk) 00:22, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Once again, I'd like to request that List of Interstate Highways in Washington be held until September 15, 2023 (the 30th anniversary of the system's completion). SounderBruce 02:31, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry about that! I was just looking in the transport section for a list to run and that was in the best shape out of all the ones I checked, and I completely forgot about this. I'll change it out tomorrow. Giants2008 (Talk) 14:03, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Today's featured list/June 13, 2022|June 13]] 

message: I would suggest that the article & blurb (& related articles) need editing before this should go anywhere near the front page. Specifically the status of South Somerset as a local government district changed earlier this year when Somerset became a unitary authority (see 4th para of Governance section of Somerset). There are dozens (perhaps hundreds) of related articles and lists which may not accurately reflect the current situation and I do not have the time or interest to address them as I have not lived in Somerset for some years.— Rod talk 08:03, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dec 22 List of scheduled monuments in South Somerset
Talk:Paul Brach

message: I started the article two minutes ago. Paul Brach was an important, notable New York artist. He showed with important galleries and was the founding dean of Cal Arts. Modernist (talk) 21:34, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems more than a little notable (dean of Cal Arts no less). Saw the speedy delete notice--it seems  to pass any notability test. freshacconcispeaktome 22:54, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Female physicians

message: Propose that this category be used to gather subcategories of women physicians where that intersection is notable. For instance, in specialties, eras, and countries in which women physicians were significantly discriminated against and consequently a significant minority. For instance, :Category:Female surgeons, :Category:Nineteenth century female physicians, etc. --Lquilter (talk) 21:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Above Bar Church, Southampton

message: This article feels like a confused combination of information about two churches - those now known as Avenue St Andrew's and Above Bar Church. For example, I was under the impression that Above Bar Church started in the 19th century and its building was not seriously damaged by WW2 bombing. The Above Bar Church building was knocked down and the current building built as part of the redevelopment of Above Bar in about 1980. However, I'm not enough of an expert (and don't have references available) to be able to address this. ADMcD (talk) 21:32, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I can make out, the history of the two churches is heavily linked as they united at one point, and then separated again later (as described in the text).  I have no personal knowledge of the history - this is only what I've gleaned from the available sources.  It may be the case that Above Bar Congregational Church was not the same entity as today's Above Bar Church - but as you say, there doesn't seem to be any reputable source to verify that.  I do vaguely recall a rumour that today's Above Bar was once a Baptist church, not a URC, and then left the Baptist Union to become independent - but again, I've found no sources that back this up.  It's amazing how much church history doesn't get recorded! Waggers (talk) 10:22, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I should have replied to this when I made a lot of changes a couple of years back. ADMcD was right that the article was a confused combination of information about two churches. As I hope is now clear in the text, Above Bar Church has never been associated with the old Congregational Church on Above Bar Street that, eventually, became Avenue St Andrews. There is plenty of recorded church history, but most of it tends to be in the church's own records, which is where my information comes from. Tonywatkins (Tonywatkins) 28 September 2010  —Preceding undated comment added 13:42, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Snow shovel

message: A snow shovel is made just for snow.  A shovel is for dirt. "Snow shovel" is a compound word. For people to work on this article, it needs to exist. --71.214.58.85 (talk) 21:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shovel 

message: A stub was created at this title before being redirected to Shovel.  Since Bluerasberry wrote a new article (in his userspace) on the subject, I've moved the old history to Talk:Snow shovel/old in order to prevent them from being deleted when I move the new article to this title.  Nyttend (talk) 04:06, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Old revisions

message: Huh. I wonder what could have prompted the expansion/development? Daniel Case (talk) 23:50, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  We didn't have an article about this until now?
Talk:List of Leeds United F.C. seasons

message: User Wikidroid 2000 submitted a change to this article's design. I've reverted it for now, as this is a featured article, and it's previous state conforms to the standard of all "seasons" featured articles on wikipedia, so I wasn't sure if this would put this in jeopardy. Having said this, I wondered what people's thoughts on this matter were, and what people thought of their re-design? ChappyTC 21:20, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-design
Talk:Britzka

message: Can Mikkalai please explain why references to Lexicus and to The Long Island Museum of American Art, History & Carriages - Collection Database were deleted. I have identified a number of apparently reliable sources for information on various types of carriage, which I was planning to insert in the relevant articles, many of which have no references at all, but I won't bother if they are to be deleted. Fbarw (talk) 22:04, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Spelling restored, sorry for an oversingt. But you are mistaken about most common spelling. Google can be grossly misleading. Rather than look in awe stunned by a million+ number, you have to look what exactly you have found. In our case it is the word "Britská" which means "British" (feminine gender) in Czech, Slovak and Slovenian (and may be in some others) languages. But references are deleted: the contain no encyclopedic information at all and cannot serve as a reference for this article. `'Míkka>t 22:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  November 2007 

message: Gogol's Dead Souls refers frequently to a britzka drawn by a troika (e.g. p. 37 in the 1997 Vintage Classics edition, tr. Pevear and Volokhonsky).  Is this anomalous or was a team of three commonly used instead of a team of two as defined in the article? BrennenderSorge (talk) 14:49, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  October 2010
Talk:New York Provincial Congress

message: ...6-9-2010-? about the authority of this congress how are rebels declaring the congress ? Thank YouDavid George DeLancey (talk) 01:37, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

message: How can William Paulding be part of First Provincial Congress when he was born in 1770? The link by his name directs to the one born in 1770. Maybe it was his father that was part of the FPC. At any rate, the link should be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.213.24.143 (talk) 17:40, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  William Paulding? 

message: The link for Johannes Hardenbergh goes to the wrong Wikipedia page; it currently links to Johannes Hardenbergh (1670–1745) who passed away long before the First New York Provincial Congress. The correct representative was his son, Col. Johannes Hardenbergh (1706-1786) of Rosendale, NY, who doesn't currently have a Wikipedia bio page.
One of the sources for this is: https://www.google.com/books/edition/History_of_New_Paltz_New_York_and_Its_Ol/hIA-AAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=New%20York%E2%80%99s%20Colonial%20Assembly%20johannes%20hardenbergh&pg=PA460&printsec=frontcover
JBhistorian (talk) 21:49, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Johannes Hardenbergh
Talk:The Stroll

message: ThiS DaNce Was AweSome!!!!!!!!!!
If you ever get a chance to dance with some old timers who know the dance it is alot of fun!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.95.182.191 (talk) 07:41, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is probably not an acceptable source, but http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGwZbs-Q1kA shows how to to do the dance.Kdammers (talk) 07:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The steps
Talk:Maria Pantazi

message: All information about her, and her husband Emmanouil Dadaoglou too, is -according to the late, prominent Greek labor historian Kostis Moskoff- basically unverified, and must be used with greatest causion, and with reservations. According to the Greek Anarchist Lexicon (by G. Fountas), she, and her husband  never have existed at all. For all these, check with the Greek article on :el:Εμμανουήλ Δαούδογλου, and its references to literature. ——Chalk19 (talk) 19:59, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did she ever existed? 

message: Centralize discussion at  czar 16:56, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  As persona of Drakoulis