Talk:Toll Brothers

message: Many things need to be changed on this page due to inaccurate or outdated material.
Toll Brothers' 2007 revenue totaled 4.65 billion, and the employee count in 2007 was 4,329.  The company builds 7,000 homes annually, not 8,000.  Toll Brothers has about 400 communities, not 300.  The company builds in 22 states, not 24.  New Hampshire and Missouri have appeared on the wikipedia list but Toll Brothers has never built in those states.
I tried to edit the page to make it accurate, but changes have been reverted.  Can anyone help to make this page accurate?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.210.95.146 (talk) 19:44, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Large amount of inaccurate information

message: Thought Wikinvest:Toll Brothers would be a good addition to the external links section. Also, some of the existing external links are a little spammey -- each one tries to sell you a different Toll Brothers condo development.
Parkerconrad (talk) 20:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I like it, I'm going to add as an external link and include some of the stuff about closing prices.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.175.196.230 (talk) 02:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested External Link

message: Removed Rhode Island from the market as Toll is no longer building there.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.150.11.25 (talk) 14:30, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated Markets 

message: because it talked about "our" something or another.   "Our" is not acceptable on wikipedia. Carptrash (talk) 01:51, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  I cut a chunk out 

message: Dear Domain Owner,
Toll Brothers, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, TB Proprietary, Inc. (collectively "Toll Brothers") provide quality services relating to the planning, design and layout of residential communities, as well as home construction services throughout the United States. The Toll Brothers name is a valuable trademark of Toll Brothers, Inc. and represents our substantial goodwill. 
It has come to our attention that you are presently using the Toll Brothers trademark in connection with your internet website. Customers and other third parties who receive or otherwise encounter this website are likely to be confused as to the source or sponsorship of the services the site due to your wholly improper use of our trademark. The website conveys the unmistakable impression that the site is somehow affiliated with, sponsored by, or otherwise approved by Toll Brothers, Inc., which it is not. 
We consider your use of the Toll Brothers trademark to constitute trademark infringement, false designation of origin and unfair competition under federal and state law. This conduct has resulted and will continue to result in damage to Toll Brothers and its trademark.
Accordingly, on behalf of Toll Brothers, we must demand that you immediately cease any and all use of the Toll Brothers trademark or any other depiction that suggests or implies that your business is affiliated with, sponsored by or otherwise associated with Toll Brothers.
Please advise me within ten (10) days from the date of this letter that you will comply with our demand. If I do not hear from you during that period, I will assume that it is your intention to continue the unlawful conduct referenced above, in which case I have instructed our counsel to exercise all available legal and equitable rights and remedies against you. These rights and remedies may include, without limitation, requests for injunctive relief, monetary damages and reimbursement of Toll Brothers' legal costs incurred in this matter.
This letter is sent without prejudice to any rights and remedies that we may have, currently or in the future. <removed text> — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.35.164.109 (talk) 09:24, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: User blocked for legal threats. --NeilN talk to me 16:20, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Nor could anyone be legitimately confused or believe that our article is in any way sponsored by Toll Brothers. This is a boilerplate demand. I suspect it is an attempt to suppress criticism, or a simple knee-jerk over-reaction to any use of their trademark by others, however legit that use may be. Block is proper. DES (talk) 16:40, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The IP address is in Zaventem, Belgium, so it's not from a U.S. lawyer at all. It could be from someone with a grudge against Toll Brothers, trying to discredit them. I wonder if the WP blocking policy applies to fake legal threats? Maproom (talk) 17:38, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: And 109.202.157.221, who briefly restored the "legal warning" to the article itself, is in Copenhagen, Denmark.  Maproom (talk) 15:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Both are co-location datacentres. One is Unix-solutions Bvba, the other is Zen Systems A/s. Neither is likely to be representative of the poster's physical location -- it's a global industry. LeadSongDog come howl! 16:08, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say that if a user was though to be making fake legal threats then it could be considered an act of vandalism. A user known to be engage in this type of activity is most likely not someone who is planning on making legitimate contributions here.--174.93.163.194 (talk) 01:19, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Legitimate or not, something sounding like a threat was added into the article and should have been reverted immediately. At least on the talk page, it would not be considered vandalism—just a legal threat. 67.220.154.178 (talk) 20:24, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

text: I think I'd agree with 174.93.163.194 - if they're making genuine legal threats, then the block is valid for NLT, and if they are posting legal threats with no intention of any legal threat, then it's disruptive editing, and a block is valid for that - especially as the addition was made to both talk page and article space.  There seems no intention to improve the article there.  Chaheel Riens (talk) 23:01, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warning 

message: A number of editors of this page appear to have a close personal or professional connection to the company, and thus to have a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting  (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request, or by clicking the link on the lowest yellow notice above. Requests that are not supported by independent reliable sources are unlikely to be accepted. 
Please also note that our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:13, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest 

message: In 2017, Toll Brothers was named to the Fortune 500 list of the largest United States corporations.http://fortune.com/fortune500/list/filtered?searchByName=toll%20brothersSkcTollBrothers (talk) 19:34, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Altamel (talk) 19:25, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fortune 500 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Toll Brothers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081207005944/http://gothamist.com/2007/09/26/williamsburg_co.php to http://gothamist.com/2007/09/26/williamsburg_co.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified