Talk:Adria (Stargate)

message: The spelling of "Orisi" was printed in the August 2006 issue of SciFi Magazine (The official Magazine of the SciFi Channel). SciFi Magazine, "TV in Focus" Stargate SG-1, Page 18, August, 2006.  This may be more reliable then GateWorld.  Morphh 13:00, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alex Levine, SG script coordinator, uses Orici in his blog entry at SciFi.com .  – Pedantic79 (talk) 16:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

text: GW uses Orici and they are pretty reliable. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 16:46, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: i still say orici...think about it... what does a doci do?... and adria is basically a doci... except with the knowledge of the the ori... soo ori + doci = orici -Xornok 16:49, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok - I'll make changes to other articles that use this name.  Morphh 16:52, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: it is my option to delete my contributions to this article as they seem to be undesirable.89.32.1.82 19:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No its not. Read the text below the box "You agree to license your contributions under the GFDL." ;-) Matthew Fenton (contribs) 19:52, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Actually i do know some latin and know people who study latin, please feel free however to enhance your contribs. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 19:55, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Exactly, thus why your it is latin is being removed. Unless you can backup this claim it shall be removed. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 20:05, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

text: That is original research + In Stargate Latin is a derivative of Ancient and thus they are are likely speaking "Ancient/Ori" Matthew Fenton (contribs) 20:15, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have been polite yet you keep readding it, it will now be considerd vandalism and you have recieved a boiler plate. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 20:17, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

text: You cant proove he speaks Latin, and it is more likely he is speaking Ancient/Ori. (Also with articles like this i look at it with a "Real World POV" IE: As if Stargate was real). Matthew Fenton (contribs) 20:24, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

text: You may be able to proove that the phrases are also Latin, however this is counted as original research. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 20:29, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Do not do it or you will be reported. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 20:33, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

text: This is a charcter bio, not a language lesson. I have been patient and fair, i have kept a calm head and i could of reported you by now for various reasons. However i will remain fair; You are new so are still learning and thus i do not wish to report you. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 20:41, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

text: However what? Matthew Fenton (contribs) 20:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes of course they did they borrowed alot of cultures but this is a bio not a language lesson. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 20:53, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Again this is a bio, this latin/ancient thing has already been mentioned at: Ancient_%28Stargate%29#Language_and_Writing_System Matthew Fenton (contribs) 21:05, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

text: No, and for the last time: You cannot proove that what he is speaking is Latin, in the Stargate universe Latin is a derivative of Ancient. It is more liekly in the SG universe he is speaking Alterian or Ori. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 21:19, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Opposed to it all together, it may translate as latin you cannot however proove it is latin. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 21:33, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I never stated i was speaking English ;-) Matthew Fenton (contribs) 21:37, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I've tried being reasonable, however i will wait till you have wrote your "special article" then judge it. Matthew Fenton 
(contribs) 21:41, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

text: The fact that it is Stargate is my purpose. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 21:43, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I have readded part of what you removed as Tomin him self translated it. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 18:59, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Please understand it doesn't matter if you (User:89.32.1.82) can prove that the phrases are in Latin.  You are not a verifiable source, and any research you are doing on the matter is considered original research.  It appears you are new to Wikipedia, and you should read the official policy on original research at Wikipedia:No Original Research.  If a producer, script writer, actor, or reliable third party were to specifically say that the phrases were Latin, then something could be written stating what was said. They could just as easily say that they "borrowed" Latin phrases to pose as Ancient/Ori, and the article should reflect exactly what was said.  What we do know is that the Prior is speaking some language, and Tomin translate for Vala.  We do not know if this language is Latin, Ancient/Ori, or some similar language that is derived from Ancient/Ori.  One last thing, please reread what you post and use the show preview to minimize the number of edits you need to do.  Any lost content from conflicts are lost because of you, and also please sign your comments on talk pages.  – Pedantic79 (talk) 19:07, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes i can with my <ref> tags :-) Matthew Fenton (contribs) 19:16, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

text: If you revert again you will be blocked, i have been lenient about your current policy vios. Next time you will be reported. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 19:21, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Help me please, what opinion? Matthew Fenton (contribs) 19:37, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Okay then even tho that is not an opinion, haha. translated -> said; the change in word now does not mean or imply it is a translation. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 19:44, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Latin

message: "Adria posses the ability to heal as well as several other abilities Priors poses". The correct spelling is possess.89.32.1.82 20:15, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed to: "a Prior possess". Matthew Fenton (contribs) 16:27, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Ok. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 17:20, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Was my fault, i counted one to many s's when spell checking. My apoligies. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 17:23, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More spelling

message: I'm editing this to say "apparent age," as she wasn't actually 4, 7, etc. yrs old.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tim4christ1 (talk • contribs).
:Yes true, its probable she wasnt exactly 4, 7 etc when we saw her as well. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 18:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Probable? It's explicitly stated in the episode that she's only a day old. 71.203.209.0 00:39, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Genetic age. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 09:07, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Age of Adria

message: Perhaps we should have a list of her observed powers.  We have already seen teleknisis, telepathy, super-human stregnth, exreme knowlage, memory and intelegence, ability to surive strikes by superweapons, ability to heal and resurect, and the ability to put a holographic projection over herself.  Who supports adding a list of her powers to the article?  We could also include a list of powers she is likely to have since other close-to-asension beings have them, like superhuman senses and rapid self healing.  Tobyk777 20:45, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a good idea though I might use the term "Abilities" instead of "Powers".  I'd also include information on the personal shield necklace if it is not already included.  Sounds more general. Morphh 20:53, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If we do so, it should be in prose format rather than simply a list.  - SigmaEpsilon → ΣΕ 21:28, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Powers

message: I just had a thought and was wondering if it was worth including in the article - if Baal was telling the truth and the collective Ori were destroyed by Merlin’s weapon, then Adria will now be the only ascended Ori left (obviously). Whilst this would make her completely outnumbered by the Ancients, the billions of people who worship the Ori still believe in the Ori, and thus contribute their life force to any ascended Ori. If Adria is alone now, then she will not have to share that power given by her followers with anyone else, potentially making her the most powerful individual ascended being in existence. That might prevent the ancients from directly attacking her. If not, she could still chose to ascend anyone she wanted (perhaps the Doci and a few Priors) to assist her (though that would force her to share the power given by the Ori followers). Anyway, I'm just spittballing and wondering if any of that is worth mentioning. (Anon - 3:10pm 07 March 2007)
Oh, and on an another note, what about the Sangraal? From the description of it the weapon was not so much a bomb as it was a kind of ZPM. If it didnt explode when it was used, then is it not still in the Ori home galaxy, physically intact? If so, doesnt Adria now have a weapon in her possession that could wipe out the Ancients the same way it did to the Ori? That makes sense, but would make it far too easy for her to win, something I dont think the writers would do. Is it possible that Merlin designed the Sangraal to self-destruct after use, knowing that it would have to be in the Ori galaxy before it was used and not wanting it to fall into their hands? (Anon - 3:30pm 07 March 2007)
I don't know. Ba'al would have no reason to lie. Remember, he himself wanted to kill the Ori AND The Ancients. They're probably dead. Anyway, about the Sangraal still being there. Yeah, it was on the ship that Adria was on that was sent through. So either it self destructed or they have it in the Ori galaxy but can't use it for the same reason they couldn't kill the Ancients in the Milky Way. They would use their powers to destroy the device first.
Vala M 17:57, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If the Ori are all dead where did she and the Priors get their power?
The power is from their minds, it's not drawn from the Ori.
Vala M 14:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Her Ascension

message: :Image:Sg1-s10e19-0.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 01:01, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Sg1-s10e19-0.jpg

message: It lists her race as Human/Ori hybrid shouldn't it now be listed as Ascended Being? --The Virginian (talk) 01:47, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Race? 

message: :Image:Adria -- Aged Four.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Adria -- Aged Four.jpg

message: :Image:Adria -- Aged Seven.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Adria -- Aged Seven.jpg

message: :Image:Adria sat on a bed.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Adria sat on a bed.jpg

message: :Image:Adria tortures Jaffa (Counterstrike).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Adria tortures Jaffa (Counterstrike).jpg