lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Louis Henri, Duke of Bourbon

message: The Living Museum of the Horse should be mentioned. Axeman89 07:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I hate to say it, but much of this article has absolutely nothing to do with Louis Henri, Duc de Bourbon, Prince de Condé.  A lengthy discussion of the marriage of Louis XV should be found in the article on Louis, not this article.  And there is almost no information about Louis Henri from the point of his activities regarding the marriage of the king until his death some 15 years later.
Thus, I would recommend excising almost all of what is found regarding the marriage of Louis XV, and let's get some information about Louis Henri from 1725 through 1740. Doug 14:17, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exactly Who is the Article About? 

message: A lot of unsourced edits are being uploaded rapidly to articles on French royalty. Some appear dubious, others wrong. Yet requests for reputable citations are ignored, deleted, or inadequately sourced (page numbers in books are essential to verify if the citation is accurate) -- while the wholesale editing continues. Please respond to these requests, either with reputable sources or more careful edits, before adding additional unsourced material. Also, much of the added material is redundant, excessive, or trivial. I've already recorded repeated objections to 1. unsourced allegations (e.g. that seem unprecedented, unlikely, or undocumentable) are apt to be deleted unless precisely sourced 2. redundancies (if it's in a box on the page, it's apt to be deleted from the text): 3. excess (details which belong in another person's article [e.g. parent, spouse, child], or which describe hard-to-verify details [e.g. "She felt envious": unless it's an attributed quote from a diary or correspondence -- how is it possible to know what someone who died hundreds of years ago "felt" or "thought"? Let's stick to what they verifiably said or did]), 4. gallicization (names and titles when combined, OK [but members of dynasties that ruled outside France -- Lorraine, Savoy, Modena, Bouillon, Monaco, etc -- shouldn't be gallicized, except for cadets born into a branch naturalised in France]; well-known phrases, yes; untranslatable terms, maybe; just for the sake of a more "French" sound or "feel" to the article -- not usually, and subject to deletion). Other editors will, of course, have their own views. Please don't use sockpuppets. I look forward to better mutual cooperation -- and better Wiki articles. Thanks. FactStraight (talk) 06:15, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundant & trivial content

message: To the best of my recollection, the first de facto PM was Talleyrand, as "President of the King's [Louis XVIII's] council". -- Jack1755 (talk) 22:31, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly Talleyrand wasn't the first de facto prime minister.  But Bourbon was certainly called Prime Minister, and fulfilled the function of one in terms of running France for those three years.  Certainly Richelieu and Mazarin are very commonly referred to as prime ministers. john k (talk) 03:06, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Prime Minister?
Talk:List of NBA career steals leaders

message: Especially when we have two different pages for the two different teams, it's a bad idea. Yes, we probably should use redirects for the older teams too. It is a million times easier to change a redirect should a team's history move around than it is to go through and change hundreds of links later. A person clicks on Seattle SuperSonics expecting to read about the Seattle Supersonics, not the Oklahoma City Thunder. See WP:NOTBROKEN for reasons it's a bad idea to pipe for redirects. It's an even worse idea to pipe when we have two separate pages. -Fandraltastic (talk) 02:44, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Piping links on team names 

message: The recent additions duplicate the annual leaders already at List of National Basketball Association season steals leaders. Also, the single-season record list would be more relevant over there than here. I'm also not sure about including the active player leaders, as it seems to border on WP:FANCRUFT.  The active leaders, AFAIK, are not really referenced long term in reliable sources.—Bagumba (talk) 01:15, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent stats added 
Talk:List of Billboard Hot 100 top-ten singles in 2005

message: Since November 30, 2015, this article has seen frequent, unexplained change to chart statistics. In particular, the two songs on the list by the group Green Day are often the altered entries, specifically the number of weeks each song spent in the top 10. Multiple users and IPv6 addresses have altered either or both entries in the table, many of whom have been reported as sockpuppets at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002. It is not known how many more of these users/IPs will be tied to this SPI, but those who have been reported to date have been linked to vandalizing not only this article, but related Billboard chart articles and those related to Green Day. The three-month semi-protection of this article  has helped as far as limiting this vandalism, though some accounts that are allowed to reach autoconfirmed status manage to get thru and are often reported.
Here is an exhaustive list of the diffs in question, altering the stats of either/both of the Green Day songs listed (mainly the "Weeks in top ten" statistic), thru April 16, 2016: 
For the record, the correct statistics for the two songs are as follows:
 List of Billboard Hot 100 top ten singles which peaked in 2005
Top tenentry date	Single                          	Artist(s)	Peak	Peak date 	Weeks intop ten
January 29       	"Boulevard of Broken Dreams"    	Green Day	2   	March 5   	14
September 24     	"Wake Me Up When September Ends"	Green Day	6   	October 15	7
The "Weeks in top ten" statistic is verifiable thru one general source listed under references in the article:
*
This is a Joel Whitburn book, so is reliable per WP:USCHARTS, but because the content of the book is not on the Internet, only those with the book can verify the information in question. I happen to own the book, and have verified the above about Green Day's songs (particularly peak, peak date, and weeks in top ten) is correct. 
As this article reflects how Billboard charted these songs (and all the songs listed in the article) on the Hot 100, and assuming the statistics have been verified correctly, the data about each song's "chart run" should not see any alterations unless the user making changes can back them with a reliable reference, or a valid explanation in the edit summary which would also need to be verified by someone else via a reliable reference. MPFitz1968 (talk) 00:52, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Persistent target of vandals 
Talk:Charles Schwab Cup Championship

message: I believe only the players finishing in the top 10 of an event are allocated Charles Schwab Cup points.  I'm wondering if this was the case for the Senior Majors also, or whether perhaps more players were awarded points in those tournaments?  Say, the top 15 maybe? 2A00:23C8:A727:E201:6C15:6902:DE34:4A15 (talk) 12:34, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Points System
Talk:Bass Pro Shops Legends of Golf

message: Should the runners-up in this event be list somehow on this page? Only for the one year that the event was an individual only event, as an IP user insists, or for all year, or for all years when it was an official money event. For the main division only or for all divisions? My preference is to leave this page as it is - there is already a lot of info on the page and adding the runner-ups has little added value. Tewapack (talk) 00:14, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of runner-up finishes
Talk:Rites of Passage (Brother Ali album)

message: I haven't listened to this album, but in the Genre section of this article it says "Horrorcore". Is that correct? I doubt Brother Ali would ever make "horrorcore" hip-hop in the vein of Gravediggaz, ICP, etc... -220.245.253.81 (talk) 00:35, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Um
Talk:Badchen

message: "has to be born both to provide the energy " etc.  "Born" means "be given birth to."  That doesn't fit with the  sense of the rest of the  sentence.  Find somebody who  knows both the language of the source and  English  and figure out what this would should have been.
100.15.120.122 (talk) 22:34, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi! You can see that it was written well, "able", but in March 2015 someone changed it to "able". Corrected it.--Arsenal sin platea (talk) 14:42, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  bad translation? 

message: Although the article in its previous form was not too bad (not a lot of incorrect information, at least), it lacked many citations or recent references. I have tried to build up the articles with some more detailed citations from Feldman, Rubin, and others. It was hard to figure out how to source information about the present day Hasidic badkhn tradition. That is one section that I think should be expanded. Another thing I wasn't sure is whether I should try to include any examples of their traditional couplets, score, sound clips, or anything. Open to suggestions.--Dan Carkner (talk) 04:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  have made some pretty big changes to the article
Talk:Tougeki – Super Battle Opera

message: List of 2009 winners for SFIV and SFIII is up. Just need someone to fill in the rest.
----
Proposal - merging those two pages:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tougeki_%E2%80%93_Super_Battle_Opera
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Tougeki_winners
Both are sort of small, and is sort of a hassle to click on another page to go to the info ^^ Atriel (talk) 06:07, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Jasc Software

message: There appears to be two conflicting versions of how the name Jasc came about in this article.  The newer version on the bottom is made by an unsigned IP address with a history of discreet vandalism, but I don't know anything about this company's background, so a source and clarification would serve well. Kelvinc 08:26, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case, I'm removing the second version of the name story.  Kelvinc 23:17, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Pretty certain it's Just Another Software Company dunno why anyone would say otherwise ?? JavaByte 21:25, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia (origin of name) contradiction
Talk:Oregon School for the Blind

message: Seems to be same article in both:
*http://www.montavilla.info/mna-newsletter-200803.pdf
*http://www.multnomah.edu/Common/PDF/Magazine/2008SpringMagazine.pdf
Katr67 (talk) 00:38, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Refs for expansion re: Montvilla/Multnomah U/Oregon Blind Trades School

message: Great refs, but needs more substantial coverage (ie. what programs did the school offer when it was open, etc). Danger (talk) 22:47, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment notes
Talk:1952 British Columbia general election

message: I was the one who mined Elections BC for Wikipedia, inputting electoral data by hand and also inputting information from footnotes on Elections BC's online publication, which is not copyrighted (no copyright symbol appears, and electoral history/data by fiat is "public" in nature).  I realize the text here is a pastiche of what's on the BC elections page, but other than rehashing the words/syntax/lexicon it can't really be left out because of the unusual nature of this election (the elimination ballot).  If you like, check with Elections BC as to whether ALL their pages are under Crown copyright, but like Hansard, I doubt that they are (unlike many government publications, including sadly all the nice online topos from maps.gov.bc.ca).  Still, the footnotes here are "part of the tables" and I could not have left out their contents; I could have taken more time to fudge around with the language but I was more concerned with the (complex) data formatting at the time of creation.  This is an important election in British Columbia history and cannot be deleted.Skookum1 08:32, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See my comments at Talk:British Columbia general election, 1953. dh ▪ 2¢ ▪ 01:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Electoral history is public domain

message: A while ago, before other things caught me up and I couldn't come back, I made a temp page with the non-infringement contents on it, as instructed by the template; it may not be necessary if this one isn't deleted, as what could be done here is either a rewrite of the disputed section, or it could be cited as a quotation from Elections BC records; note that the Elections BC footnotes themselves are often pastiches/infringements of coverage in local papers; all in the public domain by now I suppose....but originally copyrighted....anyway, a rewrite or a cited quote would solve the problem, here as well as at 1953, wouldn't it?Skookum1 19:47, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Temp subpage created as per instructions
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-12-26/WikiWorld

message: Rats. I was looking forward to an illustration of the Boston molasses disaster, though the Molasses Gang is interesting too. —Angr 08:40, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Double rats! I was looking forward to linking to Boston molasses disaster on this page, but someone beat me to it! :-) Carcharoth 16:56, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Candied rats!! Like you, I found the Boston molasses disaster article to be interesting - but there was just too much molasses-related goodness for a single cartoon. (Also, I'm not sure how I would have presented the death toll information in a lighthearted manner ...). Thanks for the notes. --Greg Williams 22:21, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Candied rats? LOL! In case you ever find a way to present deaths in a light-hearted manner, there is the Baldock Beer Disaster in a similar vein. Note the mention of a dog and "two further deaths from alcohol-related conditions". Strange. Carcharoth 00:48, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

text: That comic kind of makes me hungry, kinda.... Just H 01:37, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You could just conveniently ignore the deaths...it might have been worth it for the comic effect. I also like the idea of the gingerbread-men, and right in time for the holidays, too!--HereToHelp 01:39, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Shhhhhhh, don't tell him. I don't think he's figured that out. --Greg Williams 13:32, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Midland Highway (Victoria)

message: Can someone fix the shields halfway through the table? Is someone doing that? Jordf32123 (talk) 03:33, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird sheids 
Talk:Assembler

message: everyone who want to become a computer engineer or programmer should learn assembler before JAVA or VB!
Yum — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.18.198.106 (talk) 06:55, 7 July 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: shouldnt this assembler be included ? im not an expert and i never used as , but it is written i wikipedia in the disambiguation page of as! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.213.33.85 (talk) 12:02, 13 January 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  as , the unix command line assembler 

message: In the list of popular assemblers I've split them into those that are proprietary software and those that are free software / open-source software.  In the previous layout, some assemblers had "open source" after them and some didn't, which left it ambiguous about whether those that didn't were "open source" or not (or unknown, or the contributor didn't think to note it).  There was also another ambiguity in that one assembler was marked "public domain", but that doesn't say much since if the source code is not available then it's proprietary freeware, but if the source code is available, and is also public domain, then it is indeed free software / open-source software. --Gronky 22:10, November 14, 2005
: I don't see why it's necessary to even mention whether or not an assembler is FOSS in this article. It looks biased. I'm going to re-merge the lists and remove all text except the program's name. --Aurochs
::I don't think this is an optimal outcome, but it's better than the confusion of the original. Gronky 22:59, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  noting which assemblers are FS/OSS 

message: I vote : yes KymFarnik 06:13, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Assembly Language]]
Talk:Modal analysis using FEM

message: Excellent page, nicely done Greglocock 08:45, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  I've been contemplating writing about this topic for many years.  The existence of Wikipedia and the ability to put equations into html have created the exact circumstances to finally do it.  It's good to see someone else want this subject covered. Slffea 17:23, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Mid North

message: Dear people,
"Mid North" is a very broad term. What do you think about making the article title a bit more specific -- say, Mid North (South Australia) or Mid North Region (South Australia)? Cheers, Simon – SCHolar44 🇦🇺 💬 at 10:16, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is just "Mid North" the best article name?
Talk:Dmitry I Starshiy

message: Google counts for "Demetrius I Briański": 5 ,
"Demetrius I Starszy": 98 ,
"Demetrius I Starshiy": 77 , "Dymitr I Starszy": 4 , "Dmitry I Starshiy": 11 , "Demetrius I Starszij": 10 , "Dmitry I Starshiy": 11 . Orionus 08:52, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Supreme Constitutional Court (Egypt)

message: Right now our article says that	Maher El-Beheiry is the head, Al Ahram says that Adly Mansour is the head (and gives a photo) and The Daily Telegraph says that Adly Mahmoud is the head. That already sounds like a triumvirate for the presidency... Boud (talk) 20:13, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like Wikipedians are converging on Adly Mansour. Boud (talk) 20:20, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  who is the head?
Talk:Living Single

message: I understand that not a lot of people that frequent Wikipedia care to acknowledge shows like Living Single and the like (not to mention ignoring the fact that many elements from Friends were originally found on Living Single, a similarly themed series that premiered a year earlier, first), but that thing about the closing moments of the series never happened (at least not in the US). FOX, just as they did now, had custom graphics instead of the original closing credits at the end of the episode, so American audiences didn't see that finale. 
But owning the original FOX run of the series on VHS, the final two episodes, which aired in an hour-long finale format, had the same ending as the syndication finale, with Khadijah leaving with Scooter only looking back at the now-empty apartment one last time before turning out the lights with Auld Lang Syne playing in the background. No close-up of a phone. No call from FOX.
Again, if this was seen in international airings of the series, apologies, but in America, this ending didn't occur in the original broadcast version. Nemalki (talk) 06:33, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Series finale 

message: This show has absolutely nothing in common with Sex and the City other than both shows contained single women.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.249.236.20 (talk) 01:26, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Sex and the City'' 

message: You guys should come with a reunion show where actors play they roles it be nice to see loved this show wish was longer 2601:185:300:D210:74F2:7598:853B:577 (talk) 16:19, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reunion
Talk:Picture Perfect (1997 film)

message: How was Macy Gray's single 'I Try' featured in this movie? The movie was released in 1997 and the song 'I Try' not released till 1999.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.207.207.61 (talk) 19:37, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: 'I Try' by Macy Gray
Talk:Jehuda Cresques

message: The article begins with:
Jehuda Cresques (1350?-1427?), also known as Jafudà Cresques, Jaume Riba, and Cresques lo Jeheu ("Cresques the Jew") 
AFAIK it would be "lo juheu", but, anyway, I think "Cresques lo juheu" refers to his father, whose name was Cresques, no to him. For him, the normal way would be "Jafudà lo juheu". --83.44.189.143 09:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pride (Japanese TV series)

message: Is Takuya Kimura's name Halu or Haru as it seems to be inconsistent within the article. --Cyktsui 09:06, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Like Groink had pointed out below, this article was probably a collaboration of copy/pasting from other websites which explains the inconsistent.  In the movie, the character name sounds like Haru but it was written as Halu in his jersey, so I think we can safely assume that's his real written name.  Also, from what I learn in my Japanese class, since they dont have "l" in romanji, they replace "l" with "r".  Maybe that would explain why the actors/actress call him "Haru" but written as "Halu". Eleoopy (talk) 04:21, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Halu or Haru

message: This article seems to be a cut-n-paste from several web sites. Less than 10-percent of it is considered original writing. Why even create the article? Groink 10:05, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agreed with you completely.  The episode guide doesn't flow at all.  I am actually thinking to remove the episode guide since this isn't really "fact" nor does it follow wikipedia indifferent tone.  I just wonder why no one had removed this part before.  Hopefully I can slowly restore this article to wikipedia standards.  Eleoopy (talk) 04:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any original writing????
Talk:Garywood Assembly of God

message: This article was proposed for deletion 6 months ago because there were no sources. It still doesn't have a single source. The church website is not a reliable source. Isn't there something that can be added from the local newspapers? JodyB talk 02:12, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll work on it. (Disclosure notice: I attend this church.) Realkyhick 06:07, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:List of caves in Australia

message: Is this list partially or fully complete? --Tahren B 11:10, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No list of caves are complete -as there are protocol about not identifying some caves due to vandalism and other security issues..SatuSuro 11:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Not to mention that there's probably over 100,000 caves in Australia.  This list should really be seen as a list of important caves in Australia. hellboy 00:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact critera should be something like publicly accessible and managed caves only - no unmonitored caves should be listed SatuSuro 00:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree, because caving enthusiasts don't just visit "publicly accessible and managed caves" (show caves), they visit wild caves too. We might not need links to them all, but having a list of them is hardly a big deal. Chris Gray 01:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No-one knows the names and locations of all named caves in Australia. The only people who know the names and locations of all named caves in each state are the nominated State Caves Recorders for each state. The information simply isn't publically availble, so having a list of them is impossible, big deal or not. Hesperian 04:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the better known caves, which also appear on the WASG website anyway. So if the Speleos are comfortable with it, I can't see any harm, considering that none of the "wild caves" are actually given the locations for anyone reading this to go and visit. Locals will know where they are anyway, and it's usually been the case that locals teenagers might be responsible for most of the damage in /western Australia due to the remote locations of many of these caves. petedavo 11:15, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: comment