lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Consumer bankruptcy in Canada

message: YOU DO NOT NEED TO WRITE THE TITLES IN CAPITALS!
talk to symode09's or Spread the love! 04:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TITLES 

message: I am not versed in Canadian law but I can give some pointers as this article is on the WikiProject:Law page.
* The article has no head. The overview pahaps could be moved to the head?
* More links would be nice. More Blue! There are none, could be well over 100. Consumer, Bankrupcy (general), federal and provincial in the first line all have articles on wikipedia.
* (Unless this is different in Canada) Use legal citation. referencing using Footnotes
Overall the article is great. This criticism is intended to be helpful :-)
Bamkin 15:24, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Review

message: I find a good deal of this article to be unclear. In the first place I do not know what the chapter references listed after many bulleted points are referring to. There are several instances of either missing words or misplaced commas. As well, the language used is not altogether approachable to someone not well versed in Canadian law. The quality ratings above are pretty accurate; a good start, but needs some work.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.1.143.100 (talk) 12:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chapter References in Parentheses 

message: Is there any reason not to rename this to Consumer bankruptcy in Canada? --Chealer (talk) 21:40, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure what the emphasis would accomplish - bankruptcy is about insolvency, whether or not consumption-based. Peter Grey (talk) 19:26, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but the article doesn't discuss anything other than consumer bankruptcy, right? The precision would clarify that the article doesn't provide information about corporate bankruptcies. --Chealer (talk) 18:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps Individual bankruptcy in Canada.  (It doesn't exclude, for example, investors.) Peter Grey (talk) 23:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Banns of marriage

message: How is this word pronounced? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.38.18.141 (talk) 21:56, 14 July 2006‎
:In England it is pronounced to rhyme with cans or fans Bluewave 08:01, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: I am deleting the tag regarding a perspective only of the U.K. or Canada, as this is, by definition, an exclusively English custom without relevance elsewhere. Ohwilleke (talk) 22:21, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This blog shows an example of a U.S. church bulletin giving "marriage banns" (along with marriage bans!). *Dan T.* (talk) 13:52, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize tag 

message: The article says there is an orthodox equivalent to banns, what is that equivalent? There should be a term for it and a link to an article about it. Tibetologist (talk) 22:50, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orthodox church 
Talk:Crown attorney

message: Is "crown attorney" the correct title? I didn't think the term "attorney" was ever used in Canada. --PullUpYourSocks 21:03, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They are officially called Crown Attorney in Ontario.  In fact, if you type Crown Attorney into Google, the first link that pops up is a link to the Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General describing the Crown Attorney system.  See http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/about/artcl/2006-7/crownsys.asp.  Also, just like in the USA, the Crown Attorney is the head prosecutor in the particular judicial district, while the lawyers who work under the Crown Attorney are called Assistant Crown Attorneys.  Ontario's terminology is almost identical to many US states, save for 'Crown' rather than 'District.'  Snickerdo 06:07, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Attorney?

message: Just by doing a simple google search the term Crown Prosecutor comes up more often. This seems to follow the pattern of the UK and Australia.
Ozdaren 04:55, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Prosecutor

message: In the last paragraph, a reference is made to Crown Attorneys being paid in Canadian Bacon. My BS detector is twitching, but it just might be some quaint anachronism, similar to the wearing of wigs in British courts. LorenzoB (talk) 03:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Renumeration
Talk:Divorce Act (Canada)

message: I think we need an article on the history of divorce in Canada. Here is an example from my own family: my cousin John, who was estranged from his wife, moved in with Ann, who had her surname legally changed to his. They had children and in most ways behaved as husband and wife, but with endless legal complications. For example, both were legally parents of their children, but were legally unrelated to each other: neither could authorize emergency medical treatment as next of kin. How common was this kind of arrangement? Did Canada recognize foreign divorces? How many divorces were approved by the Senate? Dynzmoar 12:17, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of Divorce in Canada 

message: This needs some serious updating. 24.72.126.180 (talk) 19:58, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill C-78 amendments in 2019, in effect since March 1st, 2021
Talk:Dangerous offender

message: Please see Talk:Scots law#Dangerous offender. Thanks. --Mais oui! 08:19, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scots law? 

message: This article was recently added to the sex offender registration category, and I don't understand why. A dangerous offender designation has nothing to do with being registered as a sex offender. Also, not all sex offenders are designated dangerous offenders, and not all dangerous offenders are sex offenders. Being registered as a sex offender is a completely seperate matter from being designated as a dangerous offender (and in fact, there is no registration of dangerous offenders - it's merely a sentencing tool). So unless I am missing something, I would suggest removing the article from this category. Singularity42 (talk) 13:12, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sex Offender Registration category? 

message: I'm glad to see that some information has been provided about related law in the U.S. However, I decided to move it down the article. The basis of the information in the U.S. section is that there is no specific provision called 'dangerous offenders', whereas there is in the other countries listed. Also, considering the intro in the article, it didn't make sense to then lead with the U.S. section. (I actually think it should also come after the England & Wales section, but I thought it might look odd considering that that section only has one sentence.) Singularity42 (talk) 17:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  United States 
Talk:Ulawun

message: I have just delisted this article from GA, it is clearly not even close to GA citeria.  It fits Start class best on the .  --Seattle Skier (talk) 07:16, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, I am speechless that this was even listed, musta bypassed the review process, did it say when it was listed? IvoShandor 07:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: An October 25, 2005 promotion by Slambo, back then, this probably was pretty good for a Good Article, because despite being a stub, it appears completly referenced. When there's no nomination process, no criteria, and like maybe 3 or 4 other people just tagging articles which look good to them, this kind of thing happens heh. Homestarmy 03:31, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Delisted

message: a bit of interesting info here but it's rather current and likely to be updated before the end of the eruption, also hoping for something to appear in the nasa earth observatory  EdwardLane (talk) 09:20, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  26 June 2019 eruption 
Talk:Marriage in Canada

message: Someone had added to Ages of consent in North America this: "(Marriages are permitted for those above 16 outside Quebec, and above 16 for males and 14 for females in Quebec.)" I realized this is not mentioned in this article, and I couldn't find a source for it. Does anyone know if this is an exception? These two articles need to match up and need sourcing. Tyciol (talk) 06:23, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Quebec

message: I converted the external links in this list to references, but I think they could probably just go away. Is this list helpful? Kjtobo (talk) 15:28, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Key headings of the Divorce Act 

message: The line "Age restrictions are the same for opposite-sex and same-sex marriages." may be incorrect, or at least need some clarification. I believe that in at least some provinces/territories same sex marriages are not allowed for underage persons, even with parental consent. Meters (talk) 18:37, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age restrictions for same sex marriages
Talk:Vakhsh (river)

message: There are no images.  slambo 17:14, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Image added; relisted. Bantman 22:02, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delisted GA 

message: According to Great Soviet Encyclopedia confluence of Kyzyl-Suu and Muksu river forms Surhob River, that becomes Vahsh below left tributary Obihingou. Therefore, Kyzyl-Suu River, specifically Kyzyl-Suu (west) is not Vakhsh river (but just a part of it) and should be described separately. In Encyclopedia of Osh Province Kyzyl-Suu is not considered as Vakhsh as well. Redirect from Kyzyl-Suu to Vahsh will probably be removed.   Thermokarst (talk) 03:20, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Vakhsh and Kyzyl-Suu (west)
Talk:Rebellion Losses Bill

message: The introduction stated the following:
"The bill was enacted to compensate Lower Canadians who lost property during the Rebellions of 1837 and was modelled on similar measures which provided compensation in Upper Canada. Those who had participated in the Rebellion were to be compensated with taxpayer's money except for those who had been tried and convicted of high treasonItalic text."
This was the case in Upper Canada, but not in Lower Canada, and the context is correctly explained further down in the article.
I have reformulated it to make it consistent. 
This correction is based on witnesses's accounts. I will provide the source soon.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MHSche (talk • contribs) 15:24, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsitencies in the text
Talk:Patriation

message: "She remained monarch and Head of State of Canada, separate from her role as the British monarch or the monarch of any of the other Commonwealth realms.[5][6][7] Canada has complete sovereignty as an independent country, however, and the Queen's role as monarch of Canada is separate from her role as the British monarch or the monarch of any of the other Commonwealth realms.[8]" I guess, one sentence on the Queen would be enough. --SamWinchester000 (talk) 19:04, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead 

message: I propose to move Kitchen Meeting into this article, as Kitchen Accord was already moved here some time ago and the coverage of the kitchen meeting is better in this article than the separate article. Samuell Lift me up or put me down 01:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I'm not sure how to change this, but I figured I should make someone aware of it: when you hover over the internal link for this article elsewhere on Wikipedia, you get an apparently vandalized text that just reads "Bruh moment" over and over. Funny as it may be, I figure that it should be fixed...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.166.173.5 (talk) 15:58, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tooltip Issue?
Talk:R v Church of Scientology of Toronto

message: There really is a need for an article that covers the chain of events in Ontario from the Operation Snow White actions, through the raid, the various legal and publicity campaigns, Hill v. Scientology, etc, all as Scientology Series article, leaving this one mainly as a CanLaw article that covers the case itself. (I'll get right on it in my spare time...) AndroidCat 03:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Paired article

message: It'd be helpful if someone more knowledgeable than me could explain why the title of the page is "R. v. Church..." Is "R" used as an abbreviation in the Canadian legal system for The Queen? I'm not familiar with the abbreviation. 98.232.51.88 (talk) 17:22, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. -- Cirt (talk) 21:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Page title?

message: Does Canada officially recognize any religion? It doesn't have an official religion, and as far as I can tell religious organizations have no special legal status. - rakslice (talk) 07:53, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "religious organization"
Talk:Conservation Authorities Act

message: ===Record of edits in response to the above tag===
# Started a source section on this talk page. This is five and a half years after the tag was placed on the article. :) DonaldRichardSands (talk) 17:37, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Tag of concern

message: # Started a source section on this talk page. This is five and a half years after the tag was placed on the article. :) DonaldRichardSands (talk) 17:37, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Record of edits in response to the above tag

message: ===Early history===
*
*
===Summary of the CA Act's features===
*
::This source provides considerable info, easy to edit. I think it was used to explain the process of implementing changes to the Act and its regulations.DonaldRichardSands (talk) 00:17, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources to help develop this article 

message: *
::This source provides considerable info, easy to edit. I think it was used to explain the process of implementing changes to the Act and its regulations.DonaldRichardSands (talk) 00:17, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary of the CA Act's features
Talk:Boltysh crater

message: Someone may want to apply crater template

--YakbutterT (talk) 23:25, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Tim Pierce (talk) 17:01, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Crater Infobox? 

message: Please: Ukranian pronunciation of "Boltysh."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ntnglmnt (talk • contribs) 07:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronunciation 

message: The Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary has recently been reappraised to 66 mya, so many of the speculations made in this article are no longer valid. Please consider reassessment. Gruekiller (talk) 08:07, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Geological Time
Talk:Human Rights Code (Ontario)

message: Ontario E-Laws don't provide a permalink for legislation; you have to search by name from the main site. Even the OHRC official page gets this wrong. Not quite sure how to proceed --scruss 21:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I provided updated URLs that should work, at least for a while.  PKT (talk) 19:24, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

text: You can link to the most recent version of a law. You cannot permalink to a particular version of a law. Legend of 14 (talk) 02:09, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Web Link 

message: I have assigned an initial quality rating of "Start", but the article is in between Stub and Start, IMO. It could use some background information and possibly some media references to debates that took place at the time.  I have also moved its importance to "Mid" (from Low) which is debatable - the legislation is a reflection of Ontario's society, at least in theory.  PKT (talk) 19:24, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Project Template

message: "The HRTO stated it that it had no jurisdiction to ordinary people human rights abuse complaint. People[who?] disagree with HRTO think the principle and intention of the Human Rights Code (Ontario) are to protect public, not just people with protected grounds from human rights abuse." The first part makes no sense, and the second part lacks citation. Legend of 14 (talk) 02:06, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we remove this passage?
Talk:Ontario Human Rights Commission

message: Is it really necessary to have 2/3 of this article devoted not only to a single complaint but one that has been dismissed and never reached the tribunal stage? Reggie Perrin (talk) 19:28, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Macleans 

message: This article also needs to more strongly distinguish the Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC) from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO).  The HRTO is the actual judicial body that adjudicates human rights complaints.  The OHRC has no such power and in many respects is simply an "advocacy group".  A good chunk of the OHRC commissioners don't even have legal backgrounds, one of them having his claim to fame being a "chef, active in the community" for the last 20ish years or so. Drouillm (talk) 18:45, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human Rights Commission vs. Human Rights Tribunal
Talk:Court of Appeal for Ontario

message: Isn't the official name The Court of Appeal for Ontario? --Patinthehat1 19:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the official name is Court of Appeal for Ontario. See section 2 of the Courts of Justice Act. Also the Ontario Courts web site refers to it as the “Court of Appeal for Ontario”. However, under the policy Wikipedia:Naming Conventions, the official name of an institution is not necessarily used as the title for Wikipedia’s article on the institution. I would support moving this article to Court of Appeal for Ontario but the article name could also be left as it is; I don’t feel strongly either way. --Mathew5000 20:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Official name: '''Ontario Court of Appeal''' or '''Court of Appeal for Ontario''' ?
Talk:Elbridge Ayer Burbank

message: I wikified the top as possible and removed duplicate links, but this article still needs a lot of cleanup. First, I suggest putting the information in the "biography" section into the first paragraph. Almost all of it is there already. The real problem is the "works of art" section. I don't think that all of his works of art should be listed, just the notable ones. Even if they are all listed, the links will need to be fixed, as there are lots of duplicates and many links go to disambiguation pages. Also, some are the wrong meaning, like Tule River. If all of the works are to be listed, I suggest getting rid of the "year boxes" and just listing them together by year and then alphabetically (how it is currently) or just alphabetically. -- Kjkolb 01:47, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: I'm not sure how to fix.  Could someone who knows the standard fix this? Mark (talk) 13:01, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two "References" sections 

message: The article mentions (in four places) a mysterious tribe called San Ignacio; the link is to a DAB page. They are not mentioned in Burbank's memoir. I suspect that this may be an error for Ute; because Burbank may well have met Chief Ignacio, leader of the Weeminuche band. More research is needed. Narky Blert (talk) 12:34, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: San Ignacio
Talk:Same-sex marriage in Alberta

message: On April 11, 2006, NTK replaced the Canadian flag in the "Gay rights in Canada"  template with a rainbow version of the Canadian flag. 
Also, NTK deleted the provincial/territorial flag from each provincial/territorial article. What are your views on that? 
Since this is only one of the articles affected, please give your comments at this central location: Template talk:GR-C 
Wuzzy 03:40, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is rainbow Canada flag better? Should provincial/territorial flags be reinserted?

message: Article says (italics mine): «Klein also said that the Alberta government would enact provincial legislation to protect religious and civil officials who do not wish to perform a same-sex marriage. This means that an Alberta marriage commissioner who refuses to solemnize same-sex marriages would not be liable for dismissal on those grounds[...]».  ...So Klein said he wanted that legislation.  Did it, or anything else, ever happen?  -- Sean M. Burke (talk) 12:42, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Klein's Protection Plans
Talk:Same-sex marriage in British Columbia

message: On April 11, 2006, NTK replaced the Canadian flag in the "Gay rights in Canada"  template with a rainbow version of the Canadian flag. 
Also, NTK deleted the provincial/territorial flag from each provincial/territorial article. What are your views on that? 
Since this is only one of the articles affected, please give your comments at this central location: Template talk:GR-C 
Wuzzy 03:40, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is rainbow Canada flag better? Should provincial/territorial flags be reinserted?

message: Reference 1, which was apparently to a CBC web page, is now the equivalent of a 404 Not Found as of today (April 21 2007).  Does anyone -- particularly the original editor -- have a way of finding this via the Wayback Machine? Accounting4Taste 14:49, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link
Talk:Same-sex marriage in Manitoba

message: On April 11, 2006, NTK replaced the Canadian flag in the "Gay rights in Canada"  template with a rainbow version of the Canadian flag. 
Also, NTK deleted the provincial/territorial flag from each provincial/territorial article. What are your views on that? 
Since this is only one of the articles affected, please give your comments at this central location: Template talk:GR-C 
Wuzzy 03:40, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is rainbow Canada flag better? Should provincial/territorial flags be reinserted?
Talk:Same-sex marriage in Newfoundland and Labrador

message: On April 11, 2006, NTK replaced the Canadian flag in the "Gay rights in Canada"  template with a rainbow version of the Canadian flag. 
He also deleted the provincial/territorial flag from each provincial/territorial article. What are your views on that? 
Since this is only one of the articles affected, please give your comments at this central location: Template talk:GR-C 
Wuzzy 03:40, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is rainbow Canada flag better? Should provincial/territorial flags be reinserted?
Talk:Same-sex marriage in Nova Scotia

message: On April 11, 2006, NTK replaced the Canadian flag in the "Gay rights in Canada"  template with a rainbow version of the Canadian flag. 
Also, NTK deleted the provincial/territorial flag from each provincial/territorial article. What are your views on that? 
Since this is only one of the articles affected, please give your comments at this central location: Template talk:GR-C 
Wuzzy 03:40, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is rainbow Canada flag better? Should provincial/territorial flags be reinserted?
Talk:Same-sex marriage in Nunavut

message: On April 11, 2006, NTK replaced the Canadian flag in the "Gay rights in Canada"  template with a rainbow version of the Canadian flag. 
Also, NTK deleted the provincial/territorial flag from each provincial/territorial article. What are your views on that? 
Since this is only one of the articles affected, please give your comments at this central location: Template talk:GR-C 
Wuzzy 03:40, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is rainbow Canada flag better? Should provincial/territorial flags be reinserted?
Talk:Same-sex marriage in Prince Edward Island

message: On April 11, 2006, NTK replaced the Canadian flag in the "Gay rights in Canada"  template with a rainbow version of the Canadian flag. 
He also deleted the provincial/territorial flag from each provincial/territorial article. What are your views on that? 
Since this is only one of the articles affected, please give your comments at this central location: Template talk:GR-C 
Wuzzy 03:40, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is rainbow Canada flag better? Should provincial/territorial flags be reinserted?
Talk:Same-sex marriage in Quebec

message: On April 11, 2006, NTK replaced the Canadian flag in the "Gay rights in Canada"  template with a rainbow version of the Canadian flag. 
Also, NTK deleted the provincial/territorial flag from each provincial/territorial article. What are your views on that? 
Since this is only one of the articles affected, please give your comments at this central location: Template talk:GR-C 
Wuzzy 03:40, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is rainbow Canada flag better? Should provincial/territorial flags be reinserted?