lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:USS Gunnel

message: Anyone interested in researching the Gunnel more will find this site very helpful: http://www.jmlavelle.com/gunnel/
It contains the war patrol logs from the Gunnel's captains, as well comments from the COs and crew. There's also a very interesting read. Would be worth linking to them in a "more info" section on the article page as well, but I'm not sufficiently familiar with the wiki's style to do it myself.
150.101.174.242 13:11, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Patrol logs
Talk:HMS Tamar (shore station)

message: I have included some pieces of information from The Gun Plot, a private website, for want of better sources. I have no reason to doubt its correctness, as some of the information which I found there has been confirmed through another source, which I have now used in its place. However, as it is a private individual's website, it fails WP:RS. Any editor coming across better sourced information should replace the reference cited. Ohconfucius 03:49, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reliable sources

message: Naval establishments were under the administration of the Commodore-in-Charge, Hong Kong from 1866 and this base from 1897 who reported C-in-C China Station till 1941 when that station was merged with the East Indies Station to form the Eastern Fleet. The commodore Hong Kong then reported to first Commander-in-Chief, Eastern Fleet then the Commander-in-Chief, East Indies Fleet and finally  Commander-in-Chief, Far East Fleet these are all sourced on their respective pages, The  Commander British Forces in Hong Kong was a unified command appointment in which the commodore probably reported after 1971 after the Far East Fleet was abolished and its forces merged with the Western Fleet to create a single fleet under the command of the  Commander-in-Chief Fleet. The article is written from a Royal Navy perspective and not a joint command. I have a reliable source for a list of Commodores, Hong Kong and will add shortly.--Navops47 (talk) 17:02, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commodore-in-Charge, Hong Kong
Talk:Rudin

message: This has been contested by Robert M. Cutler (p. 12), who referred to Venturi, quoting Turgenev saying he was not successful in portraying Bakunin:
"Turgenev  himself  said  that  in  Rudin  he  had  wanted  to portray  Bakunin,  but  had  not  been  successful" OliveiraCris (talk) 20:14, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fairly faithful" portrait of the anarchist Mikhail Bakunin
Talk:Victoria Barracks, Hong Kong

message: I did some clean-up, but I didn't go through the entire article.  Noticeable issues:
*Footnotes should come after punctuations.
*References should use the cite tags like Template:cite web or Template:cite news.
*See Wikipedia:Manual of Style (text formatting)#Boldface
*Consider making a gallery at Commons instead of adding a gallery in the article.
Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 16:13, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up
Talk:Pacific Place (Hong Kong)

message: I'll start to begin working on this page, since it is quite big and I have a lot of information, but little/no work is being done at the moment so hopefully I can add more later when I can. CityPride 09:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Start editing

message: There is no way that the Hong Kong development is the most common usage; there are three other articles Pacific Place Jakarta, Pacific Place (Dallas, Texas), Pacific Place (Seattle) already extant, and Pacific Place was the name of the Yaletown-Stadium-False Creek lands in BC bought up and sold off to other developers by Concord Pacific (the name perhaps in emulation of the HK one, admittedly, though I don't have a cite or timeline for that).  The Pacific Place in BC was also part of what were called the Expo Lands, a title which is currently mis-directed to Expo 86 (the Expo Lands were what they were called after the fair, and were a political football-cum-scandal).Skookum1 (talk) 22:56, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Finally fixed! Wongm (talk) 04:26, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: This needs to be a disambiguation page
Talk:Sueno's Stone

message: My reading of McCullagh is that he places quite a lot of credence on Pont's map. He says:On the manuscript of Timothy Font's Mapp of Murray (c 1590) two stones have been depicted lying north of Forres (Pont Adv.MS.70.2.9 Mapp of Murray manuscript 8)....The basic veracity of Pont is not an issue and his manuscript must offer considerable weight to the hypothesis that Sueno's Stone existed in this approximate location prior to the 16th century.  He says later: The depiction of two stones on Timothy Font's map (c 1590) is not absolute proof that Sueno's Stone existed at this time, nor at precisely its present location. But Pont must be regarded as a reliable recorder as his maps formed the basis for cartography in this area for the next two centuries.  Thanks --Billreid 08:31, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Bill, clearly I'm imagining things ! Angus McLellan  (Talk) 08:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have read that Sueno's Stone was found buried in a mound '3 furlongs' outside of Forres, along with seven headless skeletons. As seven decapitated corpses are depicted on the stone, this would seem pertinent. A mound with dimples either side is noticeable in a field at the side of the modern road to Forres, not far from Sueno's Stone. How true is any of this? It may be possible that a second stone lies as yet undiscovered. 62.136.169.240 (talk) 18:44, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discovery of Sueno's Stone
Talk:Air Hong Kong

message: Based on it, it was as of 7 May 2010. I believe it was too outdated. Can someone update it with a reliable source? Thanks Maodi xn (talk) 11:08, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Destinations
Talk:Kowloon Bay

message: Just curious. What kind of expansion does the tagger expect? --Deryck C. 09:52, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: This article seems to be introducing the article as Kowloon Bay the body of water and then moved on to discussing Kowloon Bay the district. Which is it? --Kvasir 06:35, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Body of water or district

message: Need photo of the actual bay. Badagnani (talk) 17:05, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo of bay

message: As much as I think the mass removal of transport connection details is outright unhelpful, as an admin I do hope to live up to the standard set by other fellow editors and admins and be courteous, so here is the discussion.
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. However, WP:NOTTRAVEL serves to remind editors not to give travel instructions to readers, not to ban listings of transport connections. Indeed, if "Not Travel" is interpreted to exclude details of transport should be from Wikipedia, New York State Route 22 should never become a Featured article because it should've been deleted.
The current convention of articles concerning metropolitan geographical areas is that important transport connections into and out of the area should be described or listed, citing references where appropriate. See Ickenham and Lam Tin, both good articles, for example.
I understand the lack of sourcing may have cast doubts to the quality of the content. However, in geographical articles it is simply inappropriate to remove relevant content from an article without indication that the information may be incorrect. If anyone think the article has multiple issues, please change them, don't just slap templates onto them. --Deryck C. 23:21, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transport section
Talk:Martin Booth

message: Martin Booth was a teacher at Rushden Boys School when I was a pupil there (1975 - 1980). Two books he wrote - The Carrier and The Bad Track - are excluded from the list and may be the books he disowned, as per The Guardian's obituary entry for him. I read both and once asked him about The Carrier. His comments are unprintable!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.172.191.68 (talk) 14:39, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It would be nice to see information about Booth's parents - as they are extensively written about in his Hong Kong diary. Also, one of many obits talk about is wife and son. =//= Johnny Squeaky 00:02, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biographical Info 
Talk:Ghostbusters (disambiguation)

message: A ghostbuster, someone who catch ghosts - this link redirects to Ghostbusters (movie). --Windom 09:11, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

message: As far as I know, this movie doesn't even exist; there's no mention of such a film on IMDB, except for a 1946 movie which is completely unrelated to the '75 live action TV series.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Takeshi357 (talk • contribs) 12:59, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1970 movie 
Talk:Bhumi (goddess)

message: Any references for this odd name? The earth goddess is generally Bhūmi. For a reference, see Vettam Mani, Puranic Encyclopaedia, which includes common alternative names, but has no mention of Bhuma. Perhaps a regional variant? The 'Devi' bit is optional. Imc 20:26, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The name ''Bhuma Devi''

message: Bhudevi or Bhumadevi is not a regional goddess. Bhu, Bhumi (like Dhra, Dhrati, Prithivi)  are synonyms of Prithvi in Sanskrit, the suffix devi is added. Thus Prithvi and Bhudevi is the same goddess. Thus they should be merged into Prithvi as Prithvi covers the goddess as well as the tavva or element--Redtigerxyz 10:51, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Then, logically consistent, all goddesses should be merged into one article, they all are forms of the One. But Bhudevi is described totally different from Prithivi, because they are DIFFERENT forms of the earth goddess: Prithivi is spouse of the vedic (from the Vedas) god Dyaus Pita, but Bhudevi belongs to the puranic (from the Puranas) Varaha, avatar of Vishnu. So one article only would be totally wrong. (Sorry for my poor english, Durga from german wp)  --80.108.164.202 12:06, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to merge 

message: "Several female deities have had births similar to Sita. Alamelu Thayar of Tiruchendur had a similar beginning, being found in a ploughed field by Akasa Raja. Goda (Andal) was found under a Tulasi plant by Perialvar."
This uncited section is not particularly pertinent to the Goddess Bhumi. I wonder if it shouldn't be removed, or it might be better suited to the Sita article.--AaronCarson (talk) 21:28, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited and impertinent 

message: as info box image give less info about how she is worshiped 
adding 
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/75/Bhudevi_in_temple.jpg/640px-Bhudevi_in_temple.jpg
image as it is the form in which she is worshipped b locals  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pointn (talk • contribs) 13:53, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  change of infobox image
Talk:United States aircraft production during World War II

message: All the figures originally shown represent only those planes delivered to the USAAF during World War II. That figure is approximately only 60% of what was produced 1940-1945 (for example, 295959 were delivered: 158880 to USAAF, 73711 to USN-USMC, 3714 to "other US" (US Army ground forces), 38811 to UK, 14717 to USSR, 1225 to China, and 4901 to other nations). I will work on this in my sandbox and come back with both corrected figures and source.--Buckboard 11:36, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Bad URL to "Army Air Forces Statistical Digest (World War II), Aircraft and Equipment, Table 79". Please source.DLH (talk) 18:19, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  it's at AAF Digest  Rjensen (talk) 18:58, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Need Citations

message: I flagged this sentence: "The profit motive proved to be a greater spur to production than were the edicts from the generals running the totalitarian societies." This strikes me as OR, unless someone can provide a reference. It's also one that historians dispute: a major reason that US aircraft production was greater than other powers at war was because American factories were not getting bombed. 
It's also factually-inaccurate in a number of ways. UK manufacturers weren't motivated by profits? German companies weren't (they were military contractors, not state companies, after all)? "Generals" also weren't running every totalitarian country - they were busy getting shot in the 30s in the USSR, for example. I'd argue to remove this line.Konchevnik81 (talk) 19:06, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Editorializing?

message: It would be interesting to have the production categories broken down by design type (how many fighters were P-47s or P-51s, for example). I don't know how easy would be to do - the USAAF link still seems to be dead.Konchevnik81 (talk) 19:12, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Model Breakdown
Talk:Parliament of South Africa

message: Are there any interpretation services in the proceedings of the Parliament? – Kaihsu (talk) 18:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interpretation services? 

message: Does the opening of the parliament with the president's speech on the state of the nation (like yesterday) occur every year? And does the parliament now meet year-round or still the first half as it was before? that could be added to this article.--Severino (talk) 07:39, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening

message: I recreated the Westminster-style parliament diagram to separate the government from the opposition: if one doesn't do that, there's no benefit to this style of diagram. --Slashme (talk) 09:49, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for doing that. Which website did you use? My only concern with it is the incorrect placing of the opposition and government. The government should be at the bottom with the opposition at the top. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 10:56, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Oh, good point, I'll fix it! I used the parliament diagram tool to generate the diagram. --Slashme (talk) 11:02, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New parliament diagram 
Talk:2060

message: If a specific verse cannot be provided for this apparent "prophecy", it'll have to be removed, as it is untrue. Flippin42 09:43, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bible?

message: Added a "citation needed" to that thing about the hispanic J.G.A. Personally, I think it seems like a way to made us look bad. --Shadowy Crafter 20:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: J.G.A.

message: See WT:YEARS#Eclipses for a matter relevant to this page.  Arthur Rubin (alternate) (talk) 23:07, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eclipses
Talk:USS Grunion

message: ==Untitled==
Updated the page with new info regarding the finding of the USS Grunion. 3D Design 00:38, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: Updated the page with new info regarding the finding of the USS Grunion. 3D Design 00:38, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The page says "1526 tons". How sure are you it's long tons? I'd guess displacement tons. Also, I added "(two 126-cell Exide main storage batteries)"; any comment on including this on every wartime U.S. sub's page?  Trekphiler 09:43, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hey, ton

message: Reading this for the first time, it sounds like the DOD and the surviving sons' search is based on some web site information, which is otherwise unobtainable.  The wartime records of the Japanese Navy were surely in allied hands following the occupation of Japan...?  The sons, the DOD, etc. never talked to this Japanese man who published the information on his web site?  I really don't follow what is going on here and I think it could use a little cleaning up.  Afabbro 07:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Web site" not clear

message: It would be nice to clear this up. I've found sources for both 1000 feet and 1000 meters. Nothing in the New York Times, one of the few newspapers that still employs fact checkers. There are more google hits on "1000 feet" but they all seem to originate from a single AP story by Jeanette J. Lee. Older stories by the same author, from the initial sighting in 2006, use the 1000 meter figure.
The "Search For The Grunion" blog at ussgrunion.com uses the 1000 meter figure, so I'm inclined to believe that. I'm going to add these source and revert the article to meters but I would welcome more discussion. Rees11 18:28, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  At What Depth? 

message: The article says there are two possible explanations for the sinking, but later on only one is given. 68.156.95.34 (talk) 06:08, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Two possible explanations"
Talk:Aer (Sendai)

message: I'm not sure if I'm doing this correctly (I've just literally created a Wikipedia account and I've never used a Talk/Discussion page before) but, I'm pretty sure this URL is 'linking' to the wrong article.
If you look at the disambiguation page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AER_%28disambiguation%29) you'll spot the problem.
The skyscraper in Japan is written "AeR".  The band/musical-group is written "Aer".
hughdickson (talk) 01:56, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Claremont Landscape Garden

message: Needs some more photos!  I've contacted a photographer on flickr asking for permission to upload his photos.
Also, does anyone know why the Belvedere Tower has no windows?  It's really creepy....
Any mention of the grotto / caves - when they were blocked off for safety etc etc.
--Tomhannen 11:12, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 07:31, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Talk:Flexatone

message: About the use of the Flexatone.
The Khatchaturian Piano Concerto calls for the flexatone in the second movement, but the instruments you can buy today are unfit for the purpose. In search for better instruments we came across the sawlady's webpage about flexatone, where she argues that the instrument was called to replace the musical saw. I have tried to go back - replace the flexatone with a musical saw - in this piece. It made sense!
Ben.
:As you can see here, a normal flexatone is perfectly suitable for the piano concerto. The only thing a musical saw has in common with a flexatone is that it's made of metal and bent. The wailing tremolo effect intended by Khatchaturian is totally different. -- megA (talk) 12:28, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  The theremin completely lacks the "jingling" quality of the Flexatone. You might as well substitute a flute for a xylophone... -- megA (talk) 19:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Use

message: If I remember right, the Flexatone has been heavily used in a song performed by The Beach Boys. This could/should be added in the article, but I can't remember the song's title. --77.4.34.55 (talk) 13:26, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I never heard about that, and have my doubts about it.  I have a feeling you are thinking of "Good Vibrations", but what that uses is not the Flexatone, but the Theremin. M.J.E. (talk) 05:23, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Beach boys song

message: The article is currently in both :Category:Pitched percussion and :Category:Unpitched percussion. How is it both? If not, which one is it? Hyacinth (talk) 05:07, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Pitched or unpitched

message: Is this the instrument used for the "Newtype flash" sound effect in the Gundam anime series? 75.158.35.166 (talk) 22:03, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newtype?? 

message: Used one of these in a recording circa 1972. The guy who brought it to the session called it a 'Flingaphone'. Never seen that word used anywhere else since. Anyone ? Bluedawe 22:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flingaphone?
Talk:List of U.S. metropolitan areas with large African-American populations

message: This list of metropolitan areas includes, without definition or explanation, repeated instances of the initials PMSA, wikilinked in the first instance and redirecting to United States metropolitan area, where MSA is spelled out and defined but PMSA is not. 
A broader wikisearch turned up Public Monuments and Sculpture Association and Presbyterian and Methodist Schools' Association, both of which seemed unlikely.  Finally, in the third paragraph of Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky metropolitan area, it was clarified as Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area,  redirecting there, just as PMSA does here, to United States metropolitan area.
It is extremely odd when a specific technical term redirects to a page which says nothing about it.  Would someone who finds these terms meaningful, and uses them knowledgeably, please clarify their use where appropriate, i.e., in articles which contain the term, and particularly where they have been used without explanation in redirects?   Thank you.
:Athaenara (talk) 09:54, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: PMSA
Talk:Instituto Butantan

message: Fire at the Butantan Institute:
http://babelfish.yahoo.com/translate_url?doit=done&tt=url&intl=1&fr=slv&lp=xx_en&trurl=http%3a%2f%2fnoticias.r7.com%2fsao-paulo%2fnoticias%2fincendio-no-butantan-destroi-colecao-com-85-mil-cobras-20100515.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.26.47.75 (talk) 12:57, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How is Instituto Butantan supported and managed?  Is it part of the national government?  Is it similar to a US non-profit non-governemntal organization?  How is it funded?  How is its management selected?  Acwilson9 (talk) 06:23, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is Instituto Butantan supported and managed?
Talk:Wolverhampton Civic Hall

message: I think that this article should be renamed "Wolverhampton Civic Halls" and it should cover all three venues, since they are all part of the same complex. Civic Hall, Wunfrun Hall and Little Civic should then redirect to this article.
After the recent refurbishment the venue has established a new identity and is now known as The Halls Wolverhampton as of 2023. Comprising of both The Civic Hall and Wulfrun Hall and feel the page should be updated to reflect this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.103.105.243 (talk) 16:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Said performance was in 2000, not in 2001 just incase anyone should wonder why I changed it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.16.61.79 (talk) 16:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slipknot 

message: Could anyone please help me.
Did the WHO have a backup group at this gig. 195.213.189.138 (talk) 13:24, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The WHO. 1973 gig 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: No consensus   — Amakuru (talk) 20:35, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Wolverhampton Civic Hall →  – This is the official name of the complex (see website), and the Civic Hall, the current article subject, has always just been a part of the complex since its opening in 1938.  See also comment above from 77.103.105.243 Tevildo (talk) 22:49, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

text: Relisting comment: Based on WP:COMMONNAME arguments laid out by opposition, not seeing a clear enough consensus to close with. EggRoll97 (talk)  15:07, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

text: Relisting comment: Final relist; currently no evidence provided in either direction - as things stand I would expect a "no consensus" result BilledMammal (talk) 11:11, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 November 2023