Talk:Efforts to impeach George W. Bush

message: This article doesn't mention Barack Obama once. That's kind of a problem. I know WP:DOITYOURSELF or whatever, but I just don't have the time. Bsimmons666 (talk) 01:18, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Why in the world would it mention Obama? Soxwon (talk) 01:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Indeed, Obama never called for the impeachment of Bush, nor even hinted at it or responded favorably to any suggestion of it, that I can find. No connection, no place in the article. bd2412 T 02:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

text: This is because Obama opposed the WAR IN IRAQ, so thusly he would've opposed Bush. The obama point looks better in his biography, though.--Cymbelmineer (talk) 22:23, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obama 

message: I feel that this article, by its very nature is OR.  Without a reliable source that describes this supposed 'Movement to impeach George W. Bush' as a movement (like you might find for the '60s anti-war movement, for example) we are left to cobble together any and all calls for impeachment, which is exactly what this article does.  This is clearly OR, the description of a previously undocumented 'movement'.
I think the best solution is to rename this article Efforts to impeach George W. Bush or something like that and remove anything that is not an impeachment resolution or related to an official action. Bonewah (talk) 14:19, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Bush has been out of office for nearly eight months now, and yet over the weekend I saw four cars with "Impeach Bush" bumper stickers. I have no objection to renaming the article Efforts to impeach George W. Bush, but impeachment is a political process driven at least in part by the sentiments of citizens, which relates the collective expression such sentiments by citizens to whatever official action follows. bd2412 T 02:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, I cant argue with the fact that impeachment is a political process, but that is ok, because we can easily document politics.  Collective sentiment, on the other hand, is not so easy to document without performing OR. Bonewah (talk) 13:30, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That is simply inaccurate. The article never intended to prove there was a collective movement, the word movement was never being used in a collective sense, the lead section explained very clearly what the article covered. Article titles on Wikipedia are place holders and not meant to be taken literal. They nuance of an article title is explained in the lead section. Also, the article documented very well popular sentiment towards impeachment, this is an important part of American history that has been entirely wiped off of Wikipedia. Congrats. Green Cardamom (talk) 22:30, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

text: Ok I am going to request a page move (this might be controversial, so ill avoid just doing it) on or about October 16 unless anyone objects here.  My proposal is to move this page to Efforts to impeach George W. Bush and narrow it's scope to only concrete impeachment actions, like Wexler, Conyers and Kuchinich's impeachment attempts.  After this move I intend to remove at least the Treatment of detainees, NSA warrantless surveillance controversy, U.N. Charter and any other section not covered in the afore mentioned impeachment attempts. After that, I propose we expand the description of what was included in the impeachment attempts and describe them in more detail. Bonewah (talk) 13:35, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Check that, I will add the template today as there is a backlog of at least a few days.  Bonewah (talk) 13:47, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

text: What is a good date to read for a complete version? GangofOne (talk) 07:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

text: This version includes more extensive coverage of local community efforts and public opinion polls. bd2412 T 17:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

text: Is there no statute of limitations on impeachment? Like, being in office? (For the record, I think W. belongs in Gitmo, but honestly...)  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  08:10, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  OR 

message: Link 1 is no longer working. I will see if there is an alternate, or if not I will have to re-write most of the article.--Cymbelmineer (talk) 22:25, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Bonewah (talk) 23:22, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Link 1 404

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Efforts to impeach George W. Bush. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070214092150/http://www.startribune.com:80/587/story/960880.html to http://www.startribune.com/587/story/960880.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:46, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Efforts to impeach George W. Bush. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to rtsp://video1.c-span.org/15days/e071008_kucinich.rm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100218032405/http://feralhouse.com/titles/kulchur/35_articles_of_impeachment_the.php to http://feralhouse.com/titles/kulchur/35_articles_of_impeachment_the.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081029115506/http://feralhouse.com/titles/images/BushImpeachment.pdf to http://feralhouse.com/titles/images/BushImpeachment.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified