lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:R2-45

message: The current (and apparently first) GA nomination by Feoffer was opened on April 30; a Talk:R2-45/GA1 file was deleted later that day, presumably because it was opened in error at some point.
The Talk:R2-45/GA2 review page was opened by Sfarney on May 28. However, as someone who was actively editing the article (over a dozen edits) in the month prior to that point, Sfarney is not eligible to review the article. I think Prioryman was trying to address this problem earlier today, when he edited the WP:GAN page directly to put the nomination back into the reviewing pool; that didn't fix the matter, since the Legobot rebuilds the page every 20 minutes based on article talk pages, including this one, and his edits were overwritten by the bot.
What I plan to do is to have the ineligible review page deleted, and start over at GA1. However, the article's stability is questionable—stability is a GA criterion—so it might be better to withdraw the nomination for the moment (though you could hope instead that the article becomes stable before a new reviewer is found). You also might want to have the Scientology Wikiproject reassess the article now: if they still think it's C-level rather than B-level, then it's unlikely to be considered GA quality. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:37, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for doing that, BlueMoonset. Prioryman (talk) 11:54, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

text: Was Sfarney finally sanctioned and his behavior stopped for good? I know at least one editor had had enough of his behavior and unwatched the page here. If he's been banned, I will ask Demotclese to watch again TrainsOnTime (talk) 20:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, he is topic banned from Scientology for one year. The WordsmithTalk to me 22:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks, I saw a comment on BB's Facebook page mentioning that. I've Watch Listed the page again now that the offending editor's nonsense is no longer going to clog by morning's Wikipedia rituals. :) Damotclese (talk) 16:18, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

text:  (talk) -- I saw BB on Facebook mentioning this, thanks. Also check the Wig Wag page, a recent edit was made which I'm not informed enough about to confirm that it's golden. This extant page has a minor bit of grammar I thought was wrong but it appears to be used a lot on the East Coast of the United States, not so much on the West. :) Thanks. Damotclese (talk) 16:21, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to straighten out GA nomination 

message: Hi Damotclese, my goal with the introduction of this article is to make it clear to the reader who says what about R2-45. The Church's position is very relevant, and it's supported by reliable sources. There is plenty of material in the article to show the whole picture, but just saying in the lede that it's "a meaning acknowledged by the Church" is not balanced, neutral reporting. --Slashme (talk) 18:41, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Slashme's wording improves the article. Feoffer (talk) 18:47, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Literal meaning acknowledged by CoS
Talk:Maniac Road

message: I looked for coverage of this manga in reliable sources, and all I found other than the Mania reviews was a mini-review on Anime New Network .  However, there is more coverage of the sequel series Pretty Maniacs, enough that it would pass the notability guidelines .  Perhaps either information on the sequel series should be added to this article, or a separate article on the sequel series should be written. Calathan (talk) 05:40, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say probably Pretty Maniacs needs to be added here, per WP:MOS-AM. If both were covered together, together they would have enough notability to meet WP:BK. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 05:45, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: So, should we remove the prod tag from the article?  I don't really write much actual article content, and I also haven't read this manga or know anything about it, so I don't want to rewrite it myself to include information on the sequel.  However, if you think it would make sense to have this article as being about both Maniac Road and Pretty Maniacs, I would say we should remove the prod tag as it then passes the notability guidelines. Calathan (talk) 04:38, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A mini-review, plus several reviews for the sequel 

message: ANN Jason Thompson --KrebMarkt (talk) 13:20, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s) 
Talk:William Packard (author)

message: This article needs some cleanup to make it more encyclopedic. I am going to leave this to Mr. Hammond for the time being. ~ N. Harmon 16:30, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: The content on this page is taken from NY Quarterly's web page, and I don't see a reference.  Since Packard founded NY Quarterly, I sincerely doubt they stole the biography from Wikipedia.  I'm not sure what to say.  I know Wikipedia is unreliable at best, but I didn't realize its content is just plain lifted from other sites.
Pardon me, but I'll stick to - well - every other site on the Internet for my research.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.18.233.145 (talk) 02:01, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pilferred Content 

message: I am the current editor of the NYQ and posted this information from our site to get the Wikipedia page on William Packard started. I have not had time to go through and change it too much. I did change the copyright on the NYQ site's page to reflect that the article can legally co-exist on both sites without violating copyright.
Rhammond 01:37, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOT PILFERED 

message: I have just worked on this a bit to make it more encyclopedic and not as much of a eulogy. I also added the NYT obit. However, there are a lot of unsourced quotations in this I am going to leave for now. Jokestress (talk) 19:49, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs sourcing 

message: I don't believe that the middle initial belongs in the name as the title of this article.  Did William Packard ever use it?  After searching the internet and looking at the title pages of his books, it appears he never used his middle initial.  Looking at the history of editing, it appears that this article began as William Packard, and that the initial may have been added (on October 16, 2010) merely for a technical Wikipedia purpose -- to make disambiguation easier.  That reason doesn't accord with the WP article naming conventions. Barklestork (talk) 03:17, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  M?
Talk:All Saints Church, Poplar

message: The tone of this article is unencyclopaedic. Much of it seems to be derived from the Parish website (can't confirm that); or the Parish history pamphlet - the giveaway is the use of "we". There is one reference - to what appears to be a defunct website. Needs a good cleanup and revision with independent refs. Kbthompson (talk) 10:29, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Luther Gulick (physician)

message: Removed http://www.hfrr.ksu.edu/DesktopModules/ViewDocument.aspx?DocumentID=2120 as a source. It has some obvious mistakes, such as confusing this Luther Gulick with his nephew, and saying he invented Water Polo. Will try to find better sources. W Nowicki (talk) 03:13, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable source 
Talk:Daingean

message: Philipstown was 'named for' Prince Phillip, you say? That's an Americanism, and is out-of-place in this entry. Try 'named after'.
T. 87.232.43.104 16:41, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  named for? 

message: Anybody have an idea for reliable references to be used in this article? Ga2re2t 18:41, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Most controversial storylines of Coronation Street

message: This whole section is unsourced and has questionable facts. American Brit 00:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Although I did not write the section, it is reliable. The information is based on the Daran Little 40th Anniversary book, I would add citations if I had time, but I don't. Ben 00:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stories That Never Happened
Talk:Operation Danny

message: I have never heard this before, and I've read quite a bit on the subject. Please provide references that show the expulsion was not pre-meditated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.189.164.86 (talk) 04:29, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Local militia attackes? 

message: Someone has posted a tag on that article saying it should be merged into this one, and that it should be discussed here. I oppose the merge proposal, in part because Operation Danny was about more than just Lydda and Ramla; and in part because the expulsions from those cities is an issue in its own right. SlimVirgin talk|contribs 20:05, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Most certainly oppose the merge. Exodus from Lydda deserves to be in its own article, especially considering the large size it has reached now. --Sherif9282 15:42, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I oppose the merge for exactly the reasons above.Padres Hana (talk) 18:28, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Exodus from Lydda]]

message: I take care of this. Ceedjee (talk) 06:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: In the Hebrew sources it's stated 179 dead in the Israeli side and 470 dead in the Arab side. IdanST-EDITOR (talk) 14:36, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why there is no casaulties conclusion of the operation?? 

message: I’m wondering why the list of casualties only includes those of the Palmach. Balance is needed. Aviblack (talk) 06:18, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualties
Talk:Divlje jagode

message: Zele Lipovača, utemeljitelj benda Divlje jagode, izdao je novi materijal. Zele je okupio provjerene glazbenike (Pero Galić, ex pjevač Opće opasnosti, Thomas Balaž, ex bubnjar Majki i basist Dejan Orešković) Podsjetimo se da su Jagode krajem 70-ih i u 80-ima žarile hitovima "Krivo je more", "Jedina moja" i već spomenutim "Motorima”, pjesmama bez kojih ne može proći niti jedan tulum. Danas nam na repertoaru nude djevojku imena ”Marija” kako se zove prvi singl s mirišljivog albuma. Kažem mirišljivog zato jer dolazi u soft packu natopljenom mirisom jagoda pa dok slušate glazbu slobodno zaposlite i ostala osjetila. Nakon što pronjuškate po albumu procijenite sami da li današnji motori jure dobro kao i ondašnji te postoji li neka favorit pjesma na albumu. 
"Šeki"
Based in Sarajevo? I thought they came from Bihać.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.95.114.241 (talk) 18:05, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I thought these guys were all Croats...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.167.249.250 (talk) 04:10, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Croat 

message: Founded in Zagreb in 1977 by lead guitarist Zele Lipovača?  Kubura (talk) 04:59, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That is clearly a mistake at Discogs. Ostalocutanje (talk) 19:46, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founded in Zagreb?
Talk:Gerhard Barkhorn

message: The article is citing a number of WP:QS sources such as two catalogues of Knight's Cross winners. Given the questionable sources, the level of detail is WP:UNDUE. I tagged the article accordingly. 
In addition, pls see diff for some reductions. Rationale is provided in the edit summary. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:58, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags 

message: The article quotes a source as Barkhorn having been posted at Katwijk[ZH], however Katwijk[ZH] never had
an airfield, while the airfield pointed to is located at Valkenburg[ZH]. The source of this is 
any geometrical map of the Netherlands. Or ask any Dutchman.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RuudZw (talk • contribs) 11:14, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  The airfield according to the sources (Prien et al. 2002, p. 149. and Barbas) was located near Katwijk aan Zee, west-northwest of Leiden. MisterBee1966 (talk) 14:36, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airfield
Talk:Bloody April

message: For goodness sake who is still worrying about these? It is indeed possible to write a very bad, clumsy, unclear sentence that incidentally includes one or more verbal phrases with adverbs between the "to" and the particle comprising an English infinitive. It is equally possible to write clumsy sentences containing many other sentence structures that are also in themselves perfectly grammatical. No need to "correct" a split infinitive that is NOT unduly clumsy, and which clearly means what its author intended. Do we need (or have we already got?) something about this in the MOS?? --Soundofmusicals (talk) 23:35, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split Infinitives 

message: The first "red" Richthofen Albatros had a thin red wash applied over its plywood fuselage. This was done so carelessly that the national markings were obscured! The wings, however, were apparently (initially at least) still in camouflage, at least any red colouring was much more carefully applied, so that it left the outline of the black cross markings clear. -Nor does any overpainting of the wing fabric show up as "different" to the wings of the other aircraft in the lineup. Just look at the picture! While monochrome photographs can be misleading - and all the wings are catching the light at a similar angle, it is at least sufficiently doubtful that the Albatros in the picture IS actually in an "overall" red finish for us to omit the word from the caption.  --Soundofmusicals (talk) 23:50, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  How red was the Red Baron's first D.III? 

message: Not according to the source cited - which is closer to the summary given in the box to the right. From the "air" point of view, the German fighter squadrons were successful in shooting down British aircraft, but unsuccessful in preventing useful cooperation between British squadrons and ground troops. And vice versa, of course. On the other hand we might omit the whole phrase with little loss, since the essential point is made repeatedly. WWIReferences (talk) 20:31, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largely UNsuccessful?
Talk:Helmut Landsberg

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 14:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Added the page since one of the most important climatologists in the history of the United States was not included in the climatology section. Thegreatdr 16:58, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation

message: Removed the wikify tag and all sorts of wikilinks have now been added.  Thegreatdr 20:13, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page wikification believed to be complete

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:17, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Pages 63 and 64 of this publication. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:46, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info 
Talk:Rail transport in Honduras

message: Hi! I have just written this article, and would like to add a link to my personal web page dedicated to railroads in Honduras - http://railtrips.euweb.cz/c_hon_rail_en.html . What do you think?
Thanks, Jan
Sapfan 17:03, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

message: For Rail transport in Honduras#Banana Republic {{convert|250|ha/km|acres/mile}}  Peter Horn User talk 15:42, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Good, it works Peter Horn User talk 15:47, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  A conversion
Talk:Nova Scotia Highway 101

message: - I've found that you can NOT rely on Maps to provide correct information regarding routing etc. This data is often wrong, especially for Nova Scotia which isn't important enough for the mapping firms to take the effort to create maps with totally accurate information.
- There are no route markers designating Bedford Bypass as Highway 101 that I've ever seen.
It takes you *TO* the 101, but that's it.
Bedford Bypass is an unsigned route, but it SHOULD be signed as Highway 7, with Dartmouth Road being changed to a 7-A designation.
That would give Magazine Hill/Bedford Bypass a complete Route 7 designation... but NS-DOT does sloppy work and when they build the Bypass, which came after Magazine Hill, they didn't bother to clean up the route numbering. Big shock there.  The 101 designation ends at the Bedford/Sackville interchange at the 102.  This interchange is planned for distant future upgrading, and will be a connecting hub for the numerous routes in the area (1, 2, 7, 101, 102, and possibly a future 107 extension now that the original path for that has been partially lost).  For this reason, proper traffic planning would go against giving the Bedford Bypass a 101 designation... that would mean the Bedford Bypass would suddenly change mid route (where Magazine Hill begins at Dartmouth Road) into Route 7, which wouldn't make any sense from a traffic planning perspective. -Dezzo
I believe the Bedford Bypass is not part of Highway 101. Some government documents (like ) make a distinction. Google, Mapquest, etc have been known to be wrong on things like this. Kirjtc2 17:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There are 101 and 103 signs on Bayers Road too. Doesn't mean they're part of the route. I've been on the Bedford Bypass too and there are no more 101 signs going east past the 102. It only says "TO 7". Kirjtc2 23:00, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I've got a picture of the "TO 7" sign too. No 101 sign in sight. Signage means nothing because of the NS highway department's signage policies, unless you try and find some scheme to make Bayers Road part of 101 too. No reputable map I have shows it as part of 101, and even NS provincial legislation makes a distinction between 101 and the Bedford Bypass. Furthermore, as a Wikipedian since 2002 and the author of the old Nova Scotia Highways website, I'm as far from a vandal as you can get. Kirjtc2 23:54, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, do a Google search for "bedford bypass" +101. Every hit I get says something about how "101 turns into the Bedford Bypass", or "take the Bedford Bypass exit off the 101", and I even found one HRM bylaw that lists it as 7! Kirjtc2 00:15, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Just because I live in Fredericton doesn't mean I can't know about Halifax. I've been there many times. I've been corrected on local issues here before. Kirjtc2 23:54, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Christian Brothers Academy (Albany, New York)

message: Use of first person narrative and overly generous superlatives make the article bias.  Just tell the facts and let the reader draw their own conclusions. Also, the history delves too deeply into the unremarkable: concentrate on the highlights.
Nbruschi 17:13, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Such sections seem to be de rigueur in school articles, but is it necessary or incumbent upon Wikipedia to include every inappropriate sexual tryst involving a faculty member? 76.248.147.199 (talk) 18:14, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Scandal
Talk:Fairytale fantasy

message: Shouldn't Fairytale be spelt Fairy Tale (with a space)? --Renduy 20:27, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly not with a space.  Compound nouns used as adjectives get at least a hyphen, and sometimes get stuck together -- as in "fairytale", which is a common adjective.  Goldfritha 00:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: As far back as the Brothers Grimm, transcribers and retellers who were specifically aiming at children were editing the stories for that audience -- Disney is merely a part, and a fairly late part, of the process.  And as for the early ones being "unsuitable for children" -- many were told to audiences including children in all their gory and immoral glory.  It was a matter of opinion what is actually unsuitable. Goldfritha 17:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disney

message: The list is getting very long.  Unless someone objects, I will split it off soon.  Goldfritha 01:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Splitting.  Goldfritha 01:24, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The list

message: It seems to me to be odd and anachronistic to describe what is most commonly referred to as "literary fairytales" (which emerged in the late 18th century) as a subgenre of the fantasy genre (which came to be defined only in the mid-20th century). And in anycase I don't believe that "fairytale fantasy" is the WP:COMMONNAME of the 19th century genre of literary fairytales.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 21:24, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Literary fairytales: split or rename suggested

message: There is a huge difference between a fairy tale and a folk tale.
Example: Fairy tale- Beauty and the beast.
Folk tale- The greedy spider....For more information please contact me 071 089 1103 or Facebook me: En Hle or WhatsApp me:071 089 1103 41.116.75.221 (talk) 14:37, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference between Folk tales and Fairy tales
Talk:Klaas de Vries (Labour Party)

message: He was born and educated in Heerlen so I think he belongs to the category People connected to Heerlen.
:Actually he was born in Hoensbroek, which at the time was not part of the Heerlen municipality. He has played no special role in Heerlen other than being born in it. It is useless to include him in this category. BTW in the future please sign your posts using ~~~~. C mon 18:44, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Besides being born there he spend 18 years (28 %) of his life in the Heerlen/Hoensbroek region, altough he did not play a special role in Heerlen, Heerlen must have played a big role in his life Mach10 18:56, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Connected to Heerlen