lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Carondelet Reef

message: The USS Carondelet was named and commissioned in 1944.  The Carondelet Reef had this name at least by 1937.  Although sources list it as being named after its discoverer, this was obviously NOT the USS Carondelet, or the earlier US Civil War era Carondelet, which was a river vessel.  Please check other Wiki articles on persons named Carondelet.  It is quite possible that the reef was named for the ship Carondelet, but it may have been a ship of Peruvian or other nationality.  I am still looking for the earliest mention of the reef, or a geographic referrence that gives a date for an official name.  I would not be surprised to find that it dates to the whaling era in this area (1840's) or thereabouts.  The nearby Winslow reef was discovered and named in 1851 by the Phoenix.  I believe that this was the whaler out of New London, Connecticut.Pustelnik 01:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Sialogogue

message: I propose that Sialagogue be merged into Sialogogue. They refer to the same, though the first is in the context of botany and the second in the context of medicine. A fused article would benefit from combined perspectives. 98.113.133.106 (talk) 15:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ComfyKem (talk) 07:17, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Lansky (1999 film)

message: This is not a plot summary, it is a scene-by-scene recount of the first 15 minutes of the film. Unless there is opposition, I'm going to pare it down.Pmaclean (talk) 14:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: @Pmaclean: There doesn't appear to be any opposition, yet. If you have not pared the plot summary down already, please go ahead and do so. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 10:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary
Talk:The Littlest Rebel

message: You just had to do it, didn't you, Wikipedia? I suppose citing contemporary reviews under the "Critical reception" heading wasn't sufficient, because finding a negative contemporary review that supported the "racist" POV agenda was either much too hard, or impossible to find. But then you had to go even further by including TWO modern, negative reviews citing "racism" and "stereotypes" in order to give them undue weight against the ONE positive, contemporary review which no doubt more fairly represents the consensus of the public's reception (both black and white) at the time this film was originally released. Well... So much for your claim that Wikipedia articles must adhere to the principle of a "Neutral Point of View". Shameful. Absolutely shameful. 68.228.136.13 (talk) 00:01, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue Weight Given to Modern "Racism" Claims Makes This Article Non-POV Neutral 

message: Classing racism as ‘non-POV neutral’ is a racist act 2A00:23C7:F19C:1A01:F4AB:7A96:E190:74BB (talk) 11:45, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racism cannot and should not be classed as being ‘non-POV neutral’ 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. MER-C 18:41, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Chrissy Gephardt

message: She is definitely notable by WP:GNG:
#http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2003/11/13/chrissy-gephardt-stumps-for-fathers-economic/
#http://books.google.com/books?id=TWUEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA28&lpg=PA28&dq=Chrissy+Gephardt+%22The+advocate%22&source=bl&ots=ltFhsY72c5&sig=uIJxBBpw8kZXsYGIU6xVNuIUL0A&hl=en&sa=X&ei=3ykqUce1PIGQ9QT66YCoCg&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAQ
#http://www.advocate.com/news/2004/08/17/other-presidential-race
#http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Gephardt%27s+gay+daughter%3a+Chrissy+Gephardt+is+revving+up+to+solicit...-a0105367646
#http://calendar.theadvocate.com/movies/show/10953-for-the-bible-tells-me-so
#http://calendar.theadvocate.com/reviews/show/13833-review-for-the-bible-tells-me-so
#http://www.nytimes.com/1997/09/21/style/weddings-christine-gephardt-and-marc-leibole.html
— Preceding unsigned comment added by TonyTheTiger (talk • contribs) 15:07, 24 February 2013
*1, 2 and 4 are more suitably mentioned in her fathers' article, as it is her campaigning on his behalf. 3 is perhaps the best argument for her notability (although only just, in my opinion). 5 is her name on a list of people involved with 'For the Bible Tells Me So", so is not sufficient to establish notability; 6 is a review of it, but is not indepth coverage of her; 7 is a "routine announcement" - if she is notable, it is useful to add to the article, but in and of itself it does not indicate her notability (again, it is about someone who is related to a notable person). As such, I would argue that this does not show that she is definitely notable, and will consider over the next few days whether to take this to Articles for deletion or not. Thanks for giving me something to think about! PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 21:07, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROD
Talk:Sodium aurothiomalate

message: "is an organogold compound" -- is inaccurate as the gold is not "organically" (covalently) bonded in the molecule. Technically, it is a salt (mixed sodium and gold salt of thiomalic acid). The link on "organogold" already points to gold salts.
Schoschie (talk) 10:19, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Moot point- it is not actually an organogold as there are no Au-C bonds-  it is better described as containing a polymeric gold anion with sulfur bridges so a "salt"  description is an oversimplification but is closer to the truth.--Axiosaurus (talk) 18:13, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Responding to Axiosaurus: yes, almost all of the articles on gold drugs are problematic.  Pictures do exist for the polymer from the crystal structure for disodium aurothiomalate and/or aurothioglucose.  Also: see Gold salts (which usually are not salts) and gold cluster, which has been reconnected to real clusters, but did not start out that way. Awkward articles all, that were initiated with only good intentions by non-chemists.  So we have our work cut-out for us!--Smokefoot (talk) 21:23, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

message: Please answer to the best of your knowledge and provide references. Thanks you 216.240.248.98 (talk) 23:59, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why did the US discontinue it’s  usage? 

message: Please make and leave your to the best of your knowledge information with references please. 
It would be really great to have input from other nations, from both doctor’s and patient’s perspective, or a loved one witnessing and/or helping with care, and please label oneself accordingly. Thank you!! 216.240.248.98 (talk) 00:04, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does this help other types of arthritis and/or general arthritis?
Talk:Softgel

message: The named section has consumed the original article, which was about generic softgels.  It's better moved to a new article. Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 01:38, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose split out section Advil Liqui-Gels to new article 

message: Of course a Chewable tablet would be easiest to swallow.
ee1518 (talk) 17:46, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Easier to Swallow than Capsules?
Talk:Theresienstadt (1944 film)

message: Infobox tag has been removed as article already has one.  If you have any problems with this please post a message on my talk page. RWardy 14:11, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox Tag

message: I just tried to reference this stub in a comment in a discussion forum on another site.  I tried twice and failed twice.  The first time, the space and parentheses were (somehow incorrectly) auto-converted to html codes.  The second time I typed the link literally, but the other site's auto link formatter did not understand the trailing parenthesis as part of the link.  
While each of these issues can be blamed on other client or server software's shortcomings, these are not uncommon shortcomings and therefore I believe there should be tighter guidelines about how a topic or stub may be titled.
Leeconte (talk) 18:13, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Topic link (title) very clumsy to work with 

message: Today we'd call that PR or a documentary. That "cleaning up", before shots are taken isn't abnormal neither. Visit any company or school to shoot a documentary and they'll clean it up before your arrival. Btw. There is even footage about shooting the movie: https://archive.org/details/DreharbeitenInTheresienstadt  --105.6.123.246 (talk) 16:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propagandafilm? 

message: An RfC of possible interest to the editors of this article can be found here.
Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:29, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: An RfC of interest
Talk:Spectinomycin

message: Spectinomycin may have a use in CF since its effect of reducing mRNA translation fidelity causes some CFTR to be translated in spite of the presence of premature stop codons by mutation in the CFTR gene. The read through of the Stop codon produces at least some CFTR, albeit with reduced function. I don't have a source to include this in the page. Hamdev (talk) 11:07, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cystic Fibrosis 

message: "which is usually 2–10 amino acids long (this has been known to vary). "  Presumably this is supposed to be 2-10 genes not amino acids.  Amino acids are the building blocks of proteins and an individual protein could be measured in amino acids. Additionally, 2-10 amino acids would be too short for a protein, anyhow. 170.140.241.226 (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operon length
Talk:Phylogenetic comparative methods

message: This article does not appear to really be about anything, certainly not a coherent and unified group of methods that deserve their own central overview. The bulk of the article is given to lists, which are not really encyclopedic or relevant; and there is already a list of computational phylogenetics software article that the software links could link to. What little actual content is in this article is more about phylogenetics than anything else, though how a quote from Aristotle relates to 'controversy' is beyond me. If this article is to remain, it needs the lists chopped and the text dramatically expanded to reflect a consistent body of work on a coherent subject. Opabinia regalis 02:00, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - I was hoping to find an actual discussion of various phylogenetic comparative methods, but instead found something pretty vague. If nothing else, I'd suggest moving this to comparative phylogenetics, or something... — flamingspinach | (talk) 08:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That seems the best name, and gets the most google hits, so I've moved it here. Richard001 23:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article quality and name

message: I can't find anything for Torr 1998– it's not in the list of references, and googling for part of the quote itself returns only this page. 50.156.67.155 (talk) 04:11, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly, that entire section is a mess.  The quotes, like true and often eloquent, don't really add much, and there's no real "controversy" as far as I'm aware.  I've commented it out, because I'm a bit leery of deleting that much content, but at best it should be moved to a WikiQuote page. HCA (talk) 19:39, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where does the Torr quote come from? 

message: I moved the big list of quotes from the wikitext to talk:phylogenetic comparative methods/quotes for when I have time to figure out wikiquote. —Jonathan Chang 00:09, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotes moved
Talk:Eddie Kramer

message: If someone has the time, this needs some work ... it lacks a chronological order and is a bit too .... gushy. I have removed some of the worst excesses. It needs references for the Kramer quotes. It has an excess of red Wiki links. It also needs a more precise production credits section, rather like Nick Launay, which I can do in the next few days. Grimhim 02:10, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added production credits. His engineering credits, which are rather more numerous, can be added beneath. I may get a chance tomorrow. Grimhim 11:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh dear. Most of the material in this article is a direct lift from Eddie Kramer's website, a breach of WP:CP and a clear explanation of the effusiveness of praise for Kramer's work. I'll have a crack at cutting this back. Grimhim 03:03, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: What's his correct year of birth?  The lead (1942) doesn't match the category (1941). GoingBatty (talk) 00:52, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth? 

message: I've just reverted the recent batch of edits as the tone and format was more like a promotional blurb than an encyclopaedia article - Wikipedia articles must adhere to a neutral point of view. Feel free to add additional content to the existing article, but please take care to maintain the tone of the current article. Cheers - Gobeirne (talk) 23:41, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encyclopedic tone and neutral point of view
Talk:Paul Baloff

message: The article says Paul Baloff was asked to join Exodus in 1983, BUT I'd heard he sang on Exodus's 1982 demo. I'm confused. Gringo300 02:13, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He may have done it as a guest person, and tried out to see how things go. LuciferMorgan 04:38, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jane Anderson

message: Jane Anderson is listed as the writer of "It Could Happen To You" both on this Wiki article and the Wiki article titled, "It Could happen To You" (movie).
Andrew Bergman who is listed as the director of "It Could Happen To You" is listed as both the writer and director under his own Wiki article and Jane Anderson is not mentioned at all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.76.56.97 (talk) 06:34, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writer's Credit 
Talk:Ring-closing metathesis

message: This is a good page but could use a bit more, give me some time and I'll add, have to check my IP policies first. At this stage it would be a B class and high. Cheers(email at Simon.Gooding@sci.monash.edu.au) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Spgoo1 (talk • contribs) 10:40, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating
Talk:Wolf Point, Montana

message: I find it very strange that this location has no history section, given its prominence as the largest town on the Fort Peck Indian Reservation and its location on the Missouri River. All I could see is a lackingly-written section on the New Deal stuff that absolutely reeks of original research that's been dated for over three years now. I think that's long enough without any verification. Please forgive me if I've been too bold here by removing that section: the text can be found below.
The article deserves a proper history section with a balanced point of view. Why's the town here? Who started it? Why's it the biggest on the reservation? Maybe the WPA part can be woven into that. I would go ahead and write such a thing, but I live on the other side of the world and am no expert in history for that locale. Hopefully someone else can be. -DyluckTRocket (talk) 11:14, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History?? 

message: Just making a note.  At the top of the page Wolf Point's 2020 population is 2,517 however on the historical population chart the 2020 population is given as 1,517.  Thanks GEK1  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.255.147.137 (talk) 15:19, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  2020 Population
Talk:Uri

message: off
This ambiguation page presents itself as a list of abbreviations (URI), but in fact it also lists names (Uri).
Since the article is formated as an abbreviation list, I suggest moving it to URI (which currently redirects here), and changing Uri (disambiguation) to a name ambiguation page, so URI would list the acronyms while Uri (disambiguation) would list the names. Both would mention each other, as well.
I'm not an experienced Wikipedian, so I'm not sure if this is a good idea (for instance, is it allowed to create a disambiguation page without "(disambiguation)" in its title?). I'm also not sure know how to do such a thing properly (changing "what links here", categorizing a new page, etc.).
Rotem.E 11:03, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with this.Also, disambiguation pages don't need "(disambiguation)" in their titles. See Text as an example. 185.189.112.77 (talk) 22:08, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  URI vs. Uri
Talk:John Ash (writer)

message: I see it has been added already and he did die last Wednesday (3rd Dec) but I wasn't going to add anything without a source. Will have the death certificate next week but that doesn't count. Emperor (talk) 17:56, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  That article was published on the 12th December it doesn't give a date. I emailed Michael Schmidt at Carcanet on the 11th about John's death so that was the quickest they could get it online. Emperor (talk) 15:52, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Death
Talk:List of historic ranches in British Columbia

message: This was the Richter's first small ranch of 360 acres.  Their later holdings peaked out at 10,000 holdings but I think the new ranch, based at Keremeos Centre, had a different name; when it's discovered that should be the article name and, because the 'R' Ranch was a temporary precursor, that link can be a redirect to the larger ranch.Skookum1 18:59, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note on [['R' Ranch]]]

message: A Short History of Cattle Ranching in the Cariboo from the RBCM's Living Landscapes website has lots of great detailed history, mostly on ranches north from Clinton.Skookum1 (talk) 17:11, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: great resource
Talk:Suburban Rhythm (album)

message: Any questions/comments on the article, ask me (Jerciuss 02:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Derek Raymond

message: Are these lengthy quotes from his novels really necessary? Philburmc (talk) 14:27, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: No. And the whole article is unsourced and reads like fanboi spam. It's of note that Cook's literary executor is carefully namechecked in the text, which you wouldn't particularly expect in an article about a pulp author. Khamba Tendal (talk) 17:57, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Surely there is a copyright issue? The extracts go far beyond what the law allows (“fair use”) about which Wikipedia is known to be strict, see WP:CV31.124.106.73 (talk) 09:01, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lengthy quotes
Talk:Montana Cowboy Hall of Fame

message: This apparently exists an an organization that produces an annual list of inductees to a virtual hallof fame, but apparantly not with an active agenda to build a physical hall of fame. (http://www.greatfallstribune.com/story/money/2016/08/29/montana-cowboy-hall-fame-announces-class/89547678/) E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:40, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: At present, I think there's a wall in Billings over by the Metra that has the names of the inductees carved into it (That might be the Montana rodeo HOF, though).  The Western Heritage Center in Billings has some involvement. They are also working on the funding for a permanent Hall of Fame building. .  Montanabw(talk) 07:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Stamulumab

message: On 1 April 2007, an anonymous editor added that the CAS number for this compound is "705287-60-1".  It was subsequently placed in the Infobox, but the link takes you to a blank page saying "No term found". Can someone confirm whether the CAS number is incorrect or whether there is something else going on?  Theflyer 14:59, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When you put CAS numbers into the infobox it automatically creates a link to the National Library of Medicine database looking for that CAS number. However many new or more obscure compounds do not yet have a CAS number listed on that database and so will go to the page saying "no term found" when you click on the link. This CAS number is however correct according to the World Health Organisation 1 and the American Medical Association 2. Meodipt (talk) 05:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Format and thanks for the response Meodipt.  Theflyer (talk) 03:39, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: CAS Number
Talk:Scobey, Montana

message: ...from Scobey:
instead of vandalizing, how about let's create a quality article here, huh?  Maybe a history section?  Sports?  Culture (Prairie Symphonettes are still going, right?) Education? I've been gone from Scobey now for many years, but being away has only increased my appreciation for how distinctive it is.  Maybe a class project to create a first rate article?  Think about it, y'all.  --Midnite Critic (talk) 00:40, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey Kids...(and teachers) 
Talk:Culbertson, Montana

message: Currently there's a sentence saying:
:According to the United States Census Bureau, the town has a total area of 0.6 square miles (1.5 km²), all land.
This is implausible... Indeed according to the bureau, there were ~350 houses in 2009. 350 houses in 1.5 square km comes out as about four square metres per house. I presume that Culbertson isn't *that* hi-rise! Rswarbrick (talk) 18:40, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area of town 
Talk:Glasgow, Montana

message: While I was able to copyedit the first section of this article, I cannot source information given in the rest of the article, and thus I cannot cleanup those areas. I have tagged the sections accordingly. -User:DyluckTRocket (talk) 12:52, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 
Talk:Medicine Lake, Montana

message: In the computer industry, having 5 9s, 24 x 7 operational coverage is the holy grail. This means that 99.999% of the time, the system is accessible, and 24 hours per day, 7 days per week the system is available. Never down. I noticed that the Zip Code for Medicine Lake, MT is 59247. Perhaps I'm a numerologist, but has anyone picked up on that in an ad campaign? There are some famous zip codes with noteriety : 90210, 60609, 02138.
FreddyMack 12:08, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Itapiranga, Amazonas

message: this is a town. all towns are notable.DGG 02:57, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Carnassial

message: I want to see a picture! Brainmuncher 03:04, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: :Furthermore, the evolutionary design behind having only one carnassial pair is to allow for easier remodelling of the animal's dentition through natural selection, if the need to do so arises.
Really? There is no pre-planning in Darwinian evolution, so this wording is VERY suspect Snori (talk) 22:08, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite agree. I'll remove this polypompholyx (talk) 08:33, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Really?

message: The fossil record indicates the presence of carnassial teeth 50 million years ago, implying that Carnivora family members descend from a common ancestor.
The foregoing statement (currently in the article) is not supported by the source (or indeed facts). The source, from the University of Edinburgh doesn't say when the first carnivoran carnassial was present, nor that carnivorans arose at that time. It merely says that carnivorans "expanded" at that time, which I guess means there was a major radiation of carnivorans at that time. (Tne page its not one of UoE's finest moments.) In any event, carnivorans existed well before 50 mya. And so did carnassial teeth in carnivorans and elsewhere.
So, unless there is a groundswell to the contrary, I intend to delete this sourced statement in my next revision of this article. AnthroMimus (talk) 14:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fossil record" and origin of carnivorans