lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Trojan (automobile)

message: "punt" shaped?
What does that mean? Tjic
:It was a large metal tray shaped like a Punt (boat). Malcolma 19:56, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What shaped ? 

message: This could really do with a photo of some sort. --Gavinio 16:14, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo? 

message: I propose that Trojan (Racing team) and Trojan (automobile) should be merged - I think they're discussing the same entity. DH85868993 16:44, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Against. There is a lot of work required on the Trojan (Racing team) to distinguish it from the car manufacturer, but it is important enough to deserve it's own article. Mighty Antar 20:36, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

text: For: If they are the same entity, then they should be under the same article.  Maybe Spyker Cars should be merged with Spyker F1. Respectfully, SamBlob (talk) 02:29, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger 

message: The dates for production of the Elva Courier conflict with those on the Elva page? Rupertlt (talk) 22:18, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict

message: Under the heading of Sports and Bubblecars the text includes the statement "the Trojan 200, the last vehicle to bear the Trojan name". It might be more accurate to redraft this to the effect that this was the last car produced by the Trojan company.  My reasoning is that, not for the first time, some other manufacturer has hijacked a classic British name for use on another vehicle (in this case, the Mitusubishi Trojan). Douglasson (talk) 18:25, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vehicle Names 

message: I was intending to edit this Trobike section (needs precis, too wordy), but I noticed that the entire section was copy/pasted appearing in the one inline reference source website, but which came first? It's either copyvio OR own research OR not attributed to published work(s).Accordingly I've placed a refimprove section tag, as it's an obscure article anyway not too worried over copyright queries, and I've just performed minor ce and wlkilinks. As with most things on Wikipedia, it's the Law of Diminishing Returns to try to get to the bottom of it.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 01:21, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced Trobike section (and possible copyvio)
Talk:Devon Avenue

message: Pretty much all of the links in this entry are dead.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bastel (talk • contribs) 06:25, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I was able to replace two from the Internet archive, but I removed the stuff linked to the current page of a Russian language website as unverifiable and predicting the future - those businesses may not in fact have survived. Dougweller (talk) 08:30, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Links
Talk:Maine Supreme Judicial Court

message: The article states that the court is "known as the Law Court when sitting as an appellate court."  That implies that the court has some other functions as well.  If that is so they should be described in the article.  If it is not so the quoted sentence should be clarified.  I'd fix it but I'm in New York and don't know much about Maine procedure.  Thanks. Newyorkbrad 14:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes they should.  These would be the issuing of advisory opinions, the regulation of the bar, the issuing of rules of procedure, and other administrative functions of the Court.  To make sure they're right though I'll need to take a look at the Maine Constitution again, so that will be for another day or another person.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 22:27, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Drafts have been seeded for the following missing Justices of the Maine Supreme Judicial Court:
Any improvements to these would be appreciated. Cheers! BD2412 T 00:10, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drafts for missing Justices
Talk:Severn Darden

message: Darden also appeared in 'Werewolves on Wheels' in 1971
http://www.flickr.com/photos/paulmalon/7181792898/in/contacts/
LorenzoB (talk) 15:54, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Movie Credit 

message: Darden appeared as a railroad owner in the "Alias Smith & Jones" western series during its first year.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.250.201.8 (talk) 11:19, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Television series Credit 

message: It's possible there are variations of this routine, but in the 1961 LP (in the first few minutes) he says that all the space in the Universe could be crammed into a "tiny little space, unless some leaked out, and did, hence the universe." I take it to be the big bang, "and did" being a past event. Not sure what else it could mean. -- GreenC 22:07, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big Bang
Talk:Geraint Jennings

message: This page needs an infobox for a higher rating on project scale RichardColgate 11:18, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now has an infobox.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 21:00, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating

message: This is translated in the article as Alice's Adventures in Wonderland. But it looks to me like Through the Looking-Glass? Victionarier (talk) 23:27, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  L'Travèrs Du Mitheux Et Chein Qu'Alice Y Dêmuchit.
Talk:1980s in comics

message: pantat mak ko...spe yg uat internet nie mmg pantat mk ko babi sial cibai.......  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.48.46.112 (talk) 04:49, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  hye 
Talk:Aerial rigging

message: This article heavily relies on sources from Steven Santos. In 2021, Steven Santos was arrested for sexual assault of a minor. His books are no longer available, and have been generally abandoned as a source by the community. I'm going to work on replacing some of the references to his work with other sources where available, and generally cleaning up the references and external links, most of which are very outdated, and in some cases lead to resources that no longer exist.
https://www.patriotledger.com/story/news/crime/2021/01/22/whitman-steven-santos-simply-circus-coach-school-assaulted-former-student/6680299002/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJ Craig (talk • contribs) 16:14, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacing references to Steven Santos
Talk:List of years in comics

message: There may be a good reason for it, but having the decades ascending but the years per decade descending is very confusing. If everyone agrees, I'll reorder them next week so that all years are ordered ascending. Fram 15:04, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Order

message: There is rightful concern about these. 2000s in comics has been PRODed and I have given my thoughts on resolving the matter: Talk:2000s in comics#PRODed. However, we do need more input to get the right solution. (Emperor 14:57, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Decades in comics

message: What? Last time I checked, the Beano, Beezer, etc, were comics, and they're not listed on the relevant pages. This entire section needs some serious work. Digifiend (talk) 13:08, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If titles aren't listed the solution is to add them. I added 2000 AD (comics) to 1977 in comics and the quickest way to address omissions is to add them in. (Emperor (talk) 17:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. Rather than adding items from around the world and making these pages total chaos, adjust the focus.  The pages I looked at would be better titled "List of years in North American comics", or even just USofA comics, I never saw anything from Canada in my quick look. Kid Bugs (talk) 13:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  British not listed
Talk:Foresters Falls, Ontario

message: I can confirm that the book exists, since Library and Archives Canada, formerly the National Library of Canada, has a copy, according to Amicus, its online catalogue, at http://amicus.collectionscanada.ca/aaweb/aalogine.htm. Canadian publishers are required to send the Library and Archives Canada free of charge two copies of most books published in Canada.
The following book may also be of interest:
*Price, Carl, Mrs. Notes on the history of Renfrew County / compiled by Mrs. Carl Price and Clyde C. Kennedy. -- Pembroke, Ont. : Renfrew County Council, [1961]
Several Ontario libraries hold copies of the 1961 book, so that you may be able to borrow it through inter-library loan. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 15:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confirmation of book
Talk:List of ghosts in Fatal Frame

message: What?! No pictures? --Chris 15:01, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

message: If Hatred Ghosts is a heading, and each ghost under it is a hatred ghost (that will attack the player), why are there apperently helpful ghosts included under the same heading? 200.48.20.67 19:30, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hated Ghosts?
Talk:The Brotherhood of the Bell

message: I removed the nonexistent  template.  The tag was in place since July 2006, but the template still hasn't been created.  It can be added back once this has been done. —QuicksilverT @ 15:07, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nonexistent template

message: Andrew Patterson was successful in persuading Philip Dunning to help him because in the scene of Patterson and Dunning in the latter's dorm room, after Patterson exits, Dunning is shown agonizing with himself over what Patterson had told him. When Dunning meets Patterson at the San Francisco airport, the music is not as sinister as it is in the early part of the film. It has a happy ending. Andrew Patterson can emerge out of his private hell, and Philip Dunning can be his own man, not buying into the "bill of goods" that the Brotherhood of the Bell was selling.--Drboisclair (talk) 04:12, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philip Everest Dunning was not sinister at the end 

message: In order to have the two tags that were slapped onto this article removed, I condensed the original plot that I had written some 7 years ago. My intent in writing it was to facilitate the full exposition of a story that few people are able to view. I post the original here on the talk page for the purpose of those who want to know more about the story:Drboisclair (talk) 07:27, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Plot deemed too long
Talk:TV Rock

message: This is all opinion and conjecture so moving it here to be verified and / or cleaned up:
Despite the record-breaking success of "Flaunt It", sales of the album have been disappointing.  The reasoning for this could be that at the time of its release the single, "Bimbo Nation" was in its prime release and not doing so well.  Fans also add that now it is mainly because their next single, "The Others" wasn't included on the album as it was recorded after the album's release.  Record company Sony BMG Australia have cancelled plans that would have seen an album re-release, including "The Others".
Straussian (talk) 12:42, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from main article
Talk:Bench hook

message: Has no-one ever thought to leave a gap at both ends of the top batten to make it ambidextrous?31.118.42.14 (talk) 17:32, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  An Idea. 

message: Just a heads up, I boldly made some copy edits and introduced some headings to the article in an effort to improve its readability. Stussll (talk) 02:36, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: And I just rewrote quite a lot of it too! I probably got a bit carried away - so would appreciate your feedback if I've made a complete dog's ear of it. These sorts of "simple" articles can take quite a bit of head scratching to write... LittleDwangs (talk) 02:57, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heads up
Talk:Hatchet

message: Would someone who knows please say which, the hand ax or the hatchet, has a hammer head and how exactly the weight of the head differentiates the two?
Having been steeped in anthropology, to me a hand ax is a Stone Age tool. ;-)167.115.255.20 15:27, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The discussion is about a "hand axe," which is a very different tool from an "axe".  Maybe you need to sit your butt down and read a bit.  76.10.128.105 (talk) 15:01, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

text: Use the back rather than the front.Halofanatic333 (talk) 01:33, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  hatchet versus hand ax 

message: Isn't this the thing young George Washington used to cut down his father's favourite apple tree? Probably worth a mention in the article. 82.131.210.163 (talk) 21:37, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rooted in America 

message: At one point, it says that the book is part of the 'Hatchet' series. But, in another point, it is part of the 'Brian Saga.' ??? L. Zheng Wei (talk) 11:22, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Series 

message: The text says "A hatchet should not to be confused with a hand axe ... ", and the picture says (and is - according to the description - a) handaxe.
can't we put a picture of a hatchet there instead? (like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tomakawk.jpg ) 81.82.213.211 (talk) 13:38, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing picture
Talk:Roe River

message: I just made a minor edit. I decided I wanted to internally hyperlink the word river in one of the occurrences in the first paragraph. We all know for our own purposes what a river is, but to have it officially defined would enrich this article, in my humblest of opinions, so I internally hyperliked that word. Hope this pleases the jury. -- 15:19, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cmt

message: The river *was* recognized by Guiness.  I don't have a copy of the 2006 version, perhaps it is no longer.  Can anyone confirm this?  --70.122.208.47 00:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cmt

message: Who's Dallas Neil? According to the article he's a NFL player, but I can't find any reference to this Dallas Neil. Pburka 03:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dallas Neil 

message: Why is there a link to a small park in Oregon? Perhaps only because it is similarly absurd. 72.161.49.210 01:10, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I must agree.  It's a reasonable from Portland, or even D River, but it seems pointless here.  (As a side note, I live in Portland and I've seen the park.  It doesn't seem to have anything to do with the Roe River.)  Wyvern (talk) 01:45, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  see also
Talk:Jefferson C. Davis

message: The text says that his highest rank was brigadier general, but the box indicates that he attained the rank of brevet major general. Can someone harmonize those statements?  Rammer (talk) 22:30, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "Brevet" wasn't really a rank as such.  It could be a form of recognition (since there were only a few medals in those days), or it could mean that someone of rank X fulfilled the duties suitable to rank Y (see Brevet (military))... AnonMoos (talk) 16:20, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

text: , 1828 is correct. IgnorantArmies (talk) 12:50, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highest rank 
Talk:Gimlet (tool)

message: Whoever tagged this article as being unreferenced obviously didn't read it. Yes, the author didn't place a reference list at the end of the article but tagging it as citing no references is patently false. Mike Hayes (talk) 04:46, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Isn't this also called a "screw-starter", for those who are not familiar with the word "gimlet"?Zipzip50 (talk) 16:26, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate name
Talk:Fretsaw

message: I think of all the unpowered and powered curve capable cutting implements, ie Jigsaw, Scrollsaw, Fretsaw, SabreSaw etc etc, everyone calls one the other. For example many people incorrectly call Scroll Saws Fretsaw - yet technically they are correct. - and the scroll saw was more commonly called a Jigsaw at one stage. Another thing to throw in the mix is that the unpowered terminology for each of the Jigsaw, Sabre Saw and Fretsaw are all distinct, yet are again mixed and matched all over the shot. - I think making room for the  fact that each should be titled in thier most absolute form, eg Unpowered Sabre Saw and Powered Sabre saw, with a disambiguity page directing the user to either which when they link from Sabre saw.Erlyrisa 08:36, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: WTF is the picture of Jesus doing on this page?? If someone put it there intentionally he / she should give at least a reason (although 'this crucifix was made with a fretsaw' does sound a little strange). I just think it should be deleted ASAP. 81.246.93.2 20:36, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am about to snip that paragraph on the etymology anyway.  It is called a fretsaw because it is used for doing fretwork. I've done some quick research and found some fairly incontrovertible evidence that it has nothing to do with guitars.   I've also added a picture of a real fretsaw so hopefully the musicians won't remain confused for too long. CrispMuncher (talk) 20:51, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jesus 

message: Is this comparison really worth making?  They are two completely different patterns of tools.  Sure, they are both saws and they both have bows but the similarities end there.  By that logical we could just as easily compare the fretsaw to a hacksaw despite the fact they look completely different and have radically different intended uses. CrispMuncher (talk) 21:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bow saw comparison 

message: Does a fret saw cut on the pull like a coping saw, with the teeth pointing to the handle? Or does a fret saw cut on the push like a hacksaw?  216.191.39.102 (talk) 00:10, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a frame saw, so the frame is rigid but the forces on the blade itself have to be tension, not compression. Fret saws are used though with the blade vertical and pulling the workpiece down onto a horizontal table, with the user watching from above. So they're always pointing towards the handle, downwards, and are pulled. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:32, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  blade orientation
Talk:University of Rochester Medical Center

message: It would be nice to have a guide of URMC cafeteria and other public places.
128.151.71.18 15:30, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: It

message: User:Gpalmerjr edited this as part of a series of highly POV edits to URMC-related articles. --Orange Mike  |  Talk 19:31, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, then just revert the edits.  Why is a COI tag warranted?  This article has been around since 2005, with a number of editors making significant contributions.  User:Gpalmerjr came in and made a few edits on a single day.  That doesn't taint the integrity of this article or the other folks who have worked on it.  I understand that *this user* has a COI, and I don't object to deleting all of those other pages that he/she created and reverting the edits, but this article was in good shape before and I don't think it suddenly needs to be tossed out because Gpalmerjr touched it. Anson2995 (talk) 13:36, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why the COI tag
Talk:Deoxyadenosine

message: Ehm... There is a slight mistake here: 2 articles in one.
the drug cordycepin is 3'deoxyadenosine while deoxyadenosine is the normal 2'deoxynucleoside (makes DNA) that has nothing to with it (blocks RNA).. the picture is for the 2' deoxy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Squidonius (talk • contribs) 
I am not a editor and I do not know what to do.
Sorry
:Thanks for catching the mistake.  The content for cordycepin has now been moved to its own article. --Ed (Edgar181) 15:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have created redirects, 2'-Deoxyadenosine & 2-Deoxyadenosine (going to Deoxyadenosine), and 3'-Deoxyadenosine & 3-Deoxyadenosine (redirecting to Cordycepin).  Hope this is OK.  By the way, User:Squidonius, you are an editor, everybody can change and make pages.  And Wikichem can use some more editors!  Welcome!  --Dirk Beetstra T C 15:54, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Anamaria

message: Where was this information gathered. It seems resonable but a little proof is nessacary because while it seems resonable it does not seem likely. Technobabble1 15:34, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced

message: The comment that the actors were led to believe Sparrow's replacement in Black Pearl would be Anamaria needs a new source. The previous source was a link to the trivia page for the films IMDb entry, and the IMDb trivia pages are not considered verifiable sources. An acceptable source would be a printed article on the film, or perhaps a reference on the DVD release commentary. 23skidoo 18:33, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Source removed
Talk:Christmas and holiday season

message: Although it might appear acceptable (in a secular to 
From a secular point of view it seems acceptable to let the Christmas season begin at the end of November (actually this is Advent), the indication of its end should still correspond to the liturgy: there the Christmas season does not end "usually after either New Year's Day", but in my opinion rather on Epiphany or at the Baptism of the Lord (in older tradtions at 2nd February). So I would like to reinsert:
"Either on Epiphany (6 January)) or after the feast of the Baptism of the Lord, in some traditions 2 February (Candlemas)". --Medusahead (talk) 11:30, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beginning and ending 

message: 2A02:2F0D:4109:BF00:D8AF:D9FE:5935:DF71 (talk) 10:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Liu1126 (talk) 10:59, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 December 2023 

message: "Twixmas" redirects here but is not mentioned in the article. I assume it is the period between Christmas and New Year. --Jameboy (talk) 17:27, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd never heard of it before seeing your comment, but you're right about the meaning. Wiktionary has a definition... . HiLo48 (talk) 22:59, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twixmas
Talk:Sublingual administration

message: It says:
"Due to the degradative qualities of the stomach and intestine, or the solubility of the GI tract, certain substances, such as salvinorin A may only be administered orally via the sublingual route."  I think this needs to be reworded, because salvinorin A can also be absorbed by smoking.  I understand what it's trying to say, but it might be misleading to people who know nothing about salvinorin A. --BennyD 06:37, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed it up a little bit.  To me it's more clear now.  Feel free to change it again if you don't like how I worded it.  --BennyD 14:53, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I consider salvinorin A to be a very poor example of sublingual drugs, and what "the solubility of the GI tract" means is beyond me. Unfree (talk) 18:56, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salvinorin A 

message: "Many people are forced by the high cost of pharmaceuticals to split their pills and take them sublingually."  This seems to suggest that drugs designed to be administered per os might also be effective when taken sublingually, which is often untrue. Unfree (talk) 18:56, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sublingual administration of drugs not intended for it

message: What drugs are commonly taken sublingually, what molecular weight is too big for sublingual administration? These are the sorts of questions that the article does not answer, which seem like the first questions that would come to mind that would lead someone to read the article.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.65.210.106 (talk) 04:21, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  More examples would be helpful 

message: Would the route of administration of Snus technically be "sublingual"? 4.255.50.66 (talk) 18:01, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Snus]] 

message: What about the disadvantages of sublinguals? Surely there are at least some. Only one view is represented and this article is obviously biased.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.51.11.91 (talk) 00:10, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV?