Talk:Absolute Poker

message: This was an ongoing issue and I felt that this might be necessary to add as a footnote in regards to Absolute Poker. I am trying to remain impartial to the issue (I have never played on Absolute Poker but I am involved with the online poker communities and have been watching the situation). If you feel that this is biased, please help me improve it rather than remove it.
Thank you.Yoryx 08:48, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As of right now there is no reliable source to cite in regards to this information.  Until something is actually proven and then reported on by a reliable source, we can't treat rumors of superaccounts and cheating as fact. ♣♦ SmartGuy ♥♠ 15:08, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Also, this in an encyclopia, not a rumor site.  If some people want to accuse the Pope of being on the grassy knoll, it's not going to be added to articles, and certainly not as a "fact". WP:BLP requires this sort of malicious content be removed on site. Please don't add it again. 2005 21:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like someone went ahead and got an official source. Please be a little more nicer and exercise a form of patience. Yoryx 19:50, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read WP:BLP and in the future follow it because it is the policy of the encyclopedia.  Adding slanderous material is never acceptable and needs to be removed on sight by any other editor. 2005 22:10, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Added Post

message: I removed the prod tag since it is one of the 5 largest online poker rooms. I added an advert tag and the rewrite tag because the article needs a LOT of work. It's currently horribly written. --Storkk 16:24, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Title needs to be changed, too. --Storkk 16:40, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

text: It's OK now... please see WP:NOT, WP:CORP and WP:WEB to see why the state that you left it in was unacceptable. --Storkk 23:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite tag

message: I'll search tomorrow for a better article that can be the source for the "4th largest" claim. There are literally hundreds of them around, but I'm exhausted. Card Player is a good source, but the article cited (which I gave the source for) does read like a PR piece. --Storkk 23:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Try the site PokerPulse.com (if it is still in operation - I can't access now from work). SmartGuy 15:31, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Fourth largest is really a bogus term, as PokerPulse and others basically consider several of the cardrooms tied for fourth largest. They are bunched close enough together that any disinction between fourth and sixth is really meaningless.  I suggest changing the text to "one of the largest" which is accurate and the current cite confirms that, although I'd suggest we get rid of the cite. 2005 22:34, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New Source for 4th largest

message: :My first discussion so sorry if goes wrong. The website has had both the largest bad beat jackpot win on the internet with over $800k being given out at one time.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 00Doug (talk • contribs) 18:33, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's Potripper not potdripper  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.4.11.44 (talk) 12:37, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad Beat Jackpot