lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jacksonville metropolitan area

message: At first I thought it was a good idea for user Mb93j to create this page, but now I'm wondering if it is essentially the same as the First Coast, making it redundant? Kevinsnow 16:30, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, Baker County is in the Jax Metro area, while it isn't in the First Coast. Also, Flagler County is in the First Coast but is closer to Daytona. Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 01:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Metropolitan Statistical Areas are defined by the Office of Management and Budget based on economic factors. They are designed to represent large areas that functio as a single business market. -- Donald Albury 23:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitles

message: I'm going to shorten the details of the routes because it's too much. If people want to learn more, they can go to the transportation page. --MPQzy (talk) 23:44, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shortening 'major roads' section 

message: I reverted a move of this article to Jacksonville, Florida metropolitan area. First, if "Jacksonville metropolitan area" remains a redirect, the "Florida" is just verbiage unnecessary for disambiguation. Second, this appears to be the clear primary topic of the two articles. The only other ambiguous article can now be found easily through the hat note.--Cúchullain t/c 03:30, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: To this point, the Florida metro was viewed 1960 times in the last 30 days, compared to only 239 for the North Carolina metro. The latter article may be low since I just added the hat note a few days ago, but at any rate it suggests the Florida article is easily more prominent in this TWODABS situation.--Cúchullain t/c 03:36, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Gas-phase ion chemistry

message: ANyone have any positive input on the  Li-chen theory section. I have never heard of it or how it relates to gas phase ion chemistry.--Nick Y. 20:33, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: April 2006

message: I added some sections on reactions and theory. It still needs work, so feel free to continue improving. --Kkmurray (talk) 19:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: February 2009

message: When discussing the various ways of forming ions in the gas phase, why isn't electron-impact ionization presented? I would expect it to be present, given the plasma ties of this page. Lindsayad (talk) 18:51, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: April 2013
Talk:Money Train

message: Could you please remove the view source from the Money Train page?
75.156.140.29 (talk) 15:58, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: - It can't be done whilst the article is semi-protected.If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 16:04, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 July 2015 

message: What is a "decoy transit officer"? It says Grace is "a decoy transit officer". A decoy by who? For what? It later says that she is used as a stand in in a transit booth, but it's hard to imagine that they had to find a special "decoy officer" just to play that part. And judging from the fact that she arrests the boss at the end, she is obviously a real officer of some sort, not an "decoy". I suspect what is actually meant here is that she is an UNDERCOVER officer for internal affairs, investigating the transit police, posing as a mundane member of the transit police while in fact being an NYPD or FBI detective. It isn't at all clear to the reader what is meant here until the very end, and not everyone may be able to add two and two as easily, they may just end up scratching their heads. 64.223.159.36 (talk) 07:09, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Decoy"?
Talk:Anomodontia

message: In a fit of foolishness and desire to improve the article, I called these things dinosaurs. Somebody fixed that. Thanks. The lead didn't point out that they are extinct. I fixed that. Skyrocket654 (talk) 03:03, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are they? 

message: The article calls them “non-mammalian therapsids”. This is somewhat misleading.  After all, what counts as a mammal? The crown group? The pan-group? (All Synapsids.) Or something in between? There is no single point in evolution where Synapsids go from non-mammal to mammal. After all, Castorocauda et al. are often called mammals even though they are not crown mammals.--Solomonfromfinland (talk) 22:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-mammalian?
Talk:Ferizaj

message: Kosovo is not recognized country. It is formally part of Serbia, protected by international forces (KFOR), regulated by UN declaration no. 1244. That is why this city and also other cities is formally part of country Serbia, and it is Serbian province. Even there are some countries which is recognizing Kosovo as an idependant country, it is still not recognized by majority of world and by UN. 178.223.13.104 (talk) 19:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country not recognized
Template talk:User FixMyPage

message: Woah, this is a sweet idea. You gotta move this to the mainspace. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 20:53, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I may. A current discussion of it is underway at Wikipedia talk:Esperanza#Concerning "Trading Spaces".--The ikiroid (talk parler hablar paroli 说 話し parlar) 23:22, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

text: User:romarin thoroughly explained that it offended her on Wikipedia talk:Esperanza/Programs. So I changed it, and User:Natalya agreed that the changes were for the better. You can take up further discussion at the talk there, perhaps two different templates could be created.--The ikiroid (talk parler hablar paroli 说 話し parlar) 00:51, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

message: HI, all u need to use is the UBX page on wikipedia, u can see on my page that User:David sent me a web page that shows u how to do ur own boxes, it really helps! I will try to put 1 on ur page so u can see how it is done!
Techo 07:43, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  i'm waiting.....
Talk:Oligokyphus

message: This page was heavily vandalized some time ago. I removed several junk references and citations. It is possible that the junk citations replaced genuine ones, but I couldn't find the start of the vandalism by searching the revision history. RockMagnetist (talk) 20:27, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: OR please remove. --209.188.52.203 (talk) 22:55, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  From all appearances they are simply mammals. They don't even look primitve. 72.73.109.8 (talk) 04:10, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  They are not reptiles 

message: In the paleofauna section, it says that Scelidosaurus lived with Scutellosaurus when Scelidosaurus was only known from Europe, not North America. Magnatyrannus (talk) 18:00, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it says that Oligokyphus (species) lived with various dinosaurian taxa such as Scutellosaurus and Scelidosaurus.  It does NOT say that Scutellosaurus and Scelidosaurus lived with each other.  Remember that this article is on Oligokyphus as a genus, not just the Kayenta Formation species.--Kevmin § 18:05, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scelidosaurus from North America
Talk:Morganucodon

message: The three distinct bones of the middle ear is the hallmark of the mammalian species.  The jaw joint is only a consequence of that in that they are correlated, but it is not what defines a mammal.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.13.72.89 (talk) 19:23, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What Defines a Mammal

message: When I searched the web for references to the nickname "Grandma Morgie", I got only 9 hits, and about half of those were creationist sites. Is this really a nickname given by the AMNH? TomS TDotO (talk) 10:41, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Grandma Morgie

message: I have tagged File:100_1887.JPG, which is in use in this article for deletion because it does not have a copyright tag. If a copyright tag is not added within seven days the image will be deleted. --Chris 07:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Must have been done since file is indicated as non existent. Retained this message for those who give importance to such matters J.H.McDonnell (talk) 21:55, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:100_1887.JPG may be deleted 

message: Anyone know how to pronounce the name of this animal? /ˌmɔːrɡənˈjuːkəˌdɒn/? /ˌmɔːrɡəˈnʌkəˌdɒn/? /mɔːrˈgɑnəkəˌdɒn/? Peter M. Brown (talk) 18:07, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: Does anyone know if Morganucodon is even a valid name? Apparently Jenkins and Crompton (1979) (see "Taxonomic Opinions") synonymized all species of Morganucodon with Eozostrodon, which was named earlier. The Paleobiology Database lists Eozostrodon watsoni as an "alternative combination" of M. watsoni. "Eozostrodon" is mentioned in Linzey's 2012 Vertebrate Biology text here (p. 273) in a passage that resembles the discussion here. --Animalparty-- (talk) 08:15, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Kielan-Jaworowska & Luo (Mammals from the age of dinosaurs, 2004) consider them distinct and valid genera, see Google books. Petter Bøckman (talk) 10:39, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synonymous with ''[[Eozostrodon]]''?
Talk:McBain (film)

message: What is the point of having a section on the Simpsons connection explaining that there is no connection? One or two sentences may be appropriate but why does it need a whole section? TV4Fun 03:05, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tagged the section. if it's to be mentioned at all on this article (which is questionable), it certainly shouldn't take up the majority of the article body. Chris Cunningham (talk) 10:21, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simpsons Connection
Talk:Adelobasileus

message: I can see a sculpture in a museum,  at Flickr. Not sure about its copyright status even if it's released though, but I'll ask anyway. Richard001 (talk) 03:17, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 

message: It looks much like a mouse--Zakawer (talk) 17:49, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looks like modern rats and mice
Talk:FAX +49-69/450464

message: Is this their real fax number? --Avg 21:11, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nice name they got
Talk:Suminia

message: The Wiki page says it first appeared 268 million years ago, so why is that?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.40.241.62 (talk) 03:10, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Suminia is known from 268 million to 252 million years ago in the fossil record, Estemmenosuchus is known from 267 million years ago, hence they probably coexisted in the areas their fossils overlaps. Larrayal (talk) 00:16, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not entirely sure what's being asked here, as far as it relates to the article. The range of time reported for a fossil taxon usually represents uncertainty over the exact time when the species lived; it does not necessarily indicate they coexisted. Estemmenosuchus is known from the Ocher faunal subassemblage and Suminia is known from the Sokolki faunal assemblage; this suggests that the two did not coexist, as the two assemblages do not overlap in time. Ornithopsis (talk) 00:23, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: On a note, I don't know why this question was asked in the first place, as nowhere in their pages it is stated that the two species were contemporaneous. Larrayal (talk) 13:24, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coexisted with Estemmenosuchus?
Talk:Thrinaxodon

message: In Walking with Dinosaurs it was shown eating its own young..
:Well since it's a movie they can show it doing whatever they want it to.  2601:644:2:B64B:A058:740A:4B5B:2EEA (talk) 05:55, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Cannablism

message: I once read a book that showed a thrinaxodon fossil that had been found curled up like a sleeping cat or dog. The book cited this as further evidence that they were warm-blooded. I'll have to track that reference down if I can... it's been years! --Iustinus (talk) 19:25, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Curling

message: If the grammatically-correct Greek name "should" be Thrinacodon; then why not correct the name, and relegate the incorrect form Thrinaxodon to some form of footnote, e.g. "older texts may refer to these fossils as Thrinaxodon" ?  C.p. Tetraceratops fossils, once fully excavated from the surrounding rock matrix, revealed two more horns; why not rename the species, correctly, as Hexaceratops, with some form of footnote, "older texts may..." ?  What is the point of persisting known errors ? 66.235.38.214 (talk) 07:09, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I'm aware, the name was never changed, so we can't change it either. FunkMonk (talk) 09:47, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: update the name ?

message: I'm confused by this statement:
'...Thrinaxodon adopted a semi-sprawling posture, an intermediary form between the sprawling position of tetrapods (like modern Crocodilia) and the more upright posture present in current mammals.'
In fact, mammals, and birds, and reptiles are all tetrapods. I'm not a naturalist of any sort, which is why I'm not making a change, but the statement seems flat wrong. 
RobotBoy66 (talk) 13:38, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tetrapods?
Talk:Robertia

message: There's a contradiction in the description of the Beaufort Group's climate but I don't know which part is correct. The article states repeatedly that it represents a "hot" climate, but also states that the average temperature was 16-20 degrees Celsius. That's only 61-68 Fahrenheit, which is hardly "hot", unless perhaps the reader lives in Alaska. 209.136.39.130 (talk) 15:39, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Arnold Rosé

message: The German-language article says he was concertmaster of the Vienna Philharmonic 1881-1931. I'm sure he was with the orchestra that long, but was he concertmaster from the outset? That would be unusual. - Jmabel | Talk 21:17, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Concertmaster

message: The story of Mahler seeing Rosé stand up and save the orchestra at Bayreuth doesn't ring true since the audience can not see the orchestra at Bayreuth.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.119.204.117 (talk) 03:58, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mahler at Bayreuth 
Talk:USS John Paul Jones (DD-932)

message: I'm still looking for info on the USS John Paul Jones F14 disaster, but so far all I have is the date (20 September 1995) and a video file for it:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1alHJgbO3o0&search=explosion
Anyone know anything?  teh TK 21:18, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I can tell watching the video, it looks like the F14 went supersonic directly over the ship and rolled sharply to the right a second later, which probably contributed to the jet ripping itself apart moments afterwards..  maybe a problem with the wings?  I remember F14s have historically had issues with the pivoting system on the variable wings.  teh TK 22:23, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: F14 disaster
Talk:Kim Bu-sik

message: The recent edit removed links to the existing Wikipedia articles and the only external verifiable reference. It also restored a factually wrong statement: Yejong was a king (and a vassal of Liang), not an emperor, and removed all the political background. While information about Kim's role in development of Korean spirituality is interesting, it was not supported by any sources. Finally, large parts of the new/old text need stylistic and grammatical  revisions and should be made compliant with the Wikipedia rules about language neutrality. 
I'll be happy to keep all the additions of Idh0854 provided that can be properly referenced, and will restore my text.
Drterno (talk) 09:57, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edits: 30 Mar 2015

message: hmm, is it supposed to be Kim Bu-sik, with a hyphen? Appleby 23:33, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The current title of the page is "Kim Bu-sik," the lede starts with "Kim Busik" (no hyphen), and the infobox gives two Romanizations: "Gim Busik" (RR) and "Kim Pusik" (MR). That's four different forms, and the title matches neither the lede nor the two most common Romanizations.
The convention on Romanization of Korean names says we should keep the more common "Kim" instead of "Gim," but that otherwise we should use the Revised Romanization for pre-1945 Korean names. This means we should move the page to Kim Busik. Would anyone object to that? Cheers, Madalibi (talk) 04:19, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to [[Kim Busik]]? 
Talk:Mammal-like reptiles

message: Hello. I think it's fair to say that Dimetrodon is not a very good example of a mammal-like reptile. If we have to pick one for an illustration, let's find a cynodont instead. Wile E. Heresiarch 07:37, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a better example than Dimetrodon
Talk:Diictodon

message: I believe this is pronounced  di-ect-o-don- I'm not sure how to present this pronunciation IPA style, but I'm sure this is causing some confusion to people who hear the name without seeing the spelling. Please help us out if you can Cuvtixo (talk) 01:18, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

message: I strongly disagree with the citing of the BBC dino book, especially as a single source! Only the scientific literature should be referenced! This article should be fixed up soon!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.112.48.72 (talk) 20:59, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incredulity of Haines 

message: May clear things up...--76.112.48.72 (talk) 21:04, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New ref
Talk:Teenagers from Outer Space (film)

message: Since when is the film in the public domain? Any sources on this?
Yes, the Internet Achive. SIckBoy 17:00, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I searched IA's Moving Images Archive (MIA) for "Teenagers from Outer Space", "Killers from Outer Space", "The Boy from Out of This World", and anything with the word "Gargon" (i.e., Invasion of the Gargon, The Gargon Terror), but found no entry for this film. That covers all the listed titles from IMDb. This leads me to believe that this is just another assumption on someone's part that films of a certain age, that are available cheaply on DVD, and/or that have been featured on Mystery Science Theater 3000, are to be considered public domain. (See the discussion at Talk:The Brain That Wouldn't Die for more details on the problems of these assumptions and trying to confirm public-domain status even from films that are archived by MIA.) I have therefore removed the PD claims (including the category) from this article. I ask editors to cite specific evidence before restoring them. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 22:35, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've just removed from "External links" a link to a Google Video of the entire film. Unless someone can provide reliable evidence that this film is in the public domain or otherwise freely licensed, such user-uploaded videos are copyright violations. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 12:23, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

text: NOT PD worldwide and cannot be accessed without permission anywhere outside the United States. The previous poster's information is incorrect. In fact all sites and footage houses selling or offering the film for download are violating international copyright. UnderPressure 20:28, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public Domain 

message: I checked the US copyright office, and they don't list this film being under copyright. It will also enter the public domain in the uk in 2010. Retro Agnostic (talk) 05:00, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: In the US at least, this film IS public domain

message: This film was included (in full length) as a bonus feature in the 2005 videogame "Destroy All Humans!", along with some parts of the film "Plan 9 from Outer Space". I think this should be mentioned in the article. 88.22.230.223 (talk) 09:38, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Destroy All Humans!
Talk:Radio & Records

message: Important? You gotta be kidding me. I've heard national countdowns in the United States based on charts from this magazine for decades. This must be a joke! The magazine is almost mentioned in the same breath as Billboard. STRONG KEEP Royalbroil 21:26, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance

message: Since both Billboard Radio Monitor and Radio & Records will be combined into one weekly, its best that these articles be merged into one. Robert Moore 18:56 14 July 2006 (UTC)
I decided to do a new article about the "New" R&R rather than merging the two magazines since the new version will be different from both trades. Robert Moore 19:48, 04 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good call! Then the separate history of each can be preserved. --Royalbroil 04:03, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger with Billboard

message: according to Radio-info.com, Radio & Records will shut down with it's last issue be released on Friday as Nielsen Business Media closed down the R&R brand. the site is also offline for good. --Boutitbenza 69 9 (talk) 21:46, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: So are these charts going to be billboard charts? I've been using R&R's Christian Hit Radio chart for Christian music articles. Royalbroil 23:46, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I really don't know, i just read the site for radio news--Boutitbenza 69 9 (talk) 23:55, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  shut down for good
Talk:List of mayors of Colchester

message: Looking for help on creating new biographical articles for previous mayors. If you have info, please create a new articles. Thanks! Davidbober 23:40, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biographies
Talk:Stanley, Hong Kong

message: The Stanley Market section is ridiculously promotional. "You can enjoy the sea, sun and sand at a whim"?
Pradyumn444 (talk) 10:46, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stanley Market 

message: What is the population of Stanley? Seems to be a key fact missing from the lead/infobox, and I can't find an exact figure. —Ynhockey (Talk) 12:35, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population
Talk:Software engineering professionalism

message: Can anyone produce any sources at all for the supposed lawsuit filed by NSPE?  It's the sort of thing they might do, but the details and citations aren't there -- who did they file suit against, for instance?  Possibly the existence of this lawsuit and its outcome are a form of subtle vandalism; both were inserted by anonymous users, though at different ISPs. Nybbler 21:34, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've taken out the claim that "NSPE sued in all states to outlaw the use of the term Software Engineer as a noun or field of employment." which was anonymously inserted in 2002.  I also added some ACM statements and a reference.  --NealMcB (talk) 22:50, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NSPE Lawsuits? Professionalism?