Talk:Kylie Minogue/Archive 2

message: In my effort to merge the now-deleted list from the article Gay icon to the Gay icons category, I have added this page to the category. I engaged in this effort as a "human script", adding everyone from the list to the category, bypassing the fact-checking stage. That is what I am relying on you to do. Please check the article Gay icon and make a judgment as to whether this person or group fits the category. By distributing this task from the regular editors of one article to the regular editors of several articles, I believe that the task of fact-checking this information can be expedited. Thank you very much. Philwelch 21:43, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is mentioned in the article, including a variation of one of the very quotes you have provided :
Minogue is regarded as a gay icon, which she encourages with comments such as "I am not a traditional gay icon. There's been no tragedy in my life, only tragic outfits." While part of her appeal lies in her flamboyant costumes and her confident sexual posturing, she acknowledges the gay community throughout the world by performing at gay venues and events, and by openly supporting AIDS and gay rights causes. She has said that she believes gay fans responded to her apparent distress when the news media began heavily criticising her in 1989, and that those fans have remained loyal, explaining, "My gay audience has been with me from the beginning... they kind of adopted me".[20]  Rossrs 13:27, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

text: You think that's embarassing?  Let me tell you what's embarassing.  I didn't even notice ""Early in her career, Kylie became a gay icon. While part of her appeal lies in her flamboyant costumes, her humour and sense of fun, and her confident sexual posturing, she has also consistently acknowledged the gay community throughout the world, not only by her willingness to perform at gay venues and at gay events, but also her outspoken  commitment to raising social awareness."-www.ultrakylie.com/kylie/ (unfortunately not available online anymore, but still makes an important point)."  Why embarassing?  Because I didn't notice it, and I bloody wrote it! That's the great thing about Wikipedia - we write free material so that the likes of "ultrakylie.com" can flagrantly steal it.  Thank you for describing it as making "an important point". I'm flushed with pride. :-)   Some very nice quotes indeed, especially.... no, I won't say especially mine.  ;-)  Rossrs 14:55, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

text: It's ok.  I used the word "steal" with intended good humour.  If fansites use our material, which is free after all, that's a compliment.  Not very creative or original, and I assume they gave Wikipedia no credit, but it is free material.   The worst "theft" of Wikipedia's Minogue article was by the website of one of the music channels. I can't remember which or I'd link to it, as it's quite interesting to read how they corrupted the article.  They used the beginning of our article, and also the end, but completely eliminated the whole middle section which discussed her career. Hilarious.  An article about a singer, and nothing about her singing or her songs.  It made no sense, and it looked like someone had lifted our article, realized it was too big, and chopped out the middle without even reading it.  And someone was being paid to do that - music channel sites tend not to be created by unpaid volunteers ;-)  That's the only time I've seen Wikipedia's material used in such a blatantly dishonest way and I was quite angry at the time. Rossrs 12:01, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gay Icon Project 

message: Until someone can WP:CITE an official source for the information being listed in the Vocal Profile section, this content has been removed.  It appears that a large number of vocalist articles on Wikipedia are being plagued by invalid information pertaining to vocal range and other vocal capabilities.  By invalid I mean that no sources are cited and the numbers are being tweaked on a day-to-day basis as to what the artists actual range is, with no one ever citing any official external source for such information.  How did this article manage to pass by peer review without a source? Hall Monitor 17:19, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, the vocal profile was added after both the peer review, and promotion to featured article status. Rossrs 09:36, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of the Vocal Profile section 

message: As as indicator of her celebrity status, or perhaps as interesting trivia, I think that songs which mention Kylie should be included.(The KLF's 1989 single "Kylie said to Jason" and The Pretenders song "Popstar". There may be others).   Design 10:54, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is another: "Do It With Madonna" by The Androids, which features the verses "I'd really like to be with Kylie/I think she's really really hott/I wonder if I could get Kylie". The video clip for the song also features a Kylie impersonator wearing a similar outfit to that of Kylie in her 'comback-hit' of 2000; "Spinning Around". Shayan g 12:35, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting that the lyrics dismiss Madonna's other competition, Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera and P!nk, but the lyricist can't quite bring himself to say something bad about Kylie so instead he wonders if he can get Kylie to "do it with Madonna".  ;-)  Seriously, it's the only song that was a hit (top 5 Australia, and I think in the UK it barely missed the top 10, or it might have just scraped in, so it's a legitimate hit) Rossrs 09:17, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

text: This seems like a really good thing to incorporate into the "Image and celebrity status" section.. I think that section needs some cleanup too, I get tired reading it :( -- getcrunkjuicecontribs 00:39, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Songs which mention Kylie

message: Should the peak positions of the Dance/Club Play chart be included in the "hit singles" table? (per this) I think so, but that might be a little excess. Comments?? -- getcrunkjuicecontribs 00:42, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a difficult question. On the one hand I think yes, because in the U.S. she is a big success as a dance genre artist, something that these particular charts illustrate.  In that particular segment of the larger music industry she's a major artist, though on the wider stage, in the U.S., she's not.  On the other hand it could be seen as excessive detail. Rossrs 09:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've replied at #Infobox and chart positions. -- getcrunkjuicecontribs 18:24, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Billboard dance chart positions 

message: The heading & first paragraph don't show up.. is it just me or is something wrong with the article markup? -- getcrunkjuicecontribs 22:01, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: it's not just you.  I can't see it either.  But last time I looked at the article (a few days ago), I could. Rossrs 08:42, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it's the result of this edit. -- getcrunkjuicecontribs 00:18, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: which makes it even more mysterious. The adding of the other references hasn't caused problems with the rest of the article.  I wonder how it can be fixed. Rossrs 09:19, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe, in the link to the edit given above, the problem was the first ref name added was missing a "/". Hyacinth 12:58, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you Detective Hyacinth!  It turned out to be the reference to the 80s bands Human League etc that was incorrect.   Oh what a problem one little "/" can cause!  Looks ok now.  Thanks for the tip! Rossrs 13:33, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's up with the "Breast cancer" section? 

message: Now I know that it isn't particularly simple to locate an image and place it in the article, especially as the lead image, but I am currently a bit taken-off by the current. It isn't that it is a "good" or "bad" screenshot, but it is the fact that Minogue is rather difficult to identify. Perhaps it would be possible to find a different lead image and place this one where appropriate in the article? I am merely providing a suggestion; this doesn't have to follow through. —Eternal Equinox | talk 23:52, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I had/have the same concern with the picture.. I really think there are many better pictures, but this one is a GDFL pic. Maybe another image will be found, but then the article will have eleven images. That and the three sound sample boxes might crowd the article. Anyway, I will try to look for a different picture. -- getcrunkjuicecontribs 00:29, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It may be worth trying. You are right about all of the sound samples and images though, but we'll see what we can do. —Eternal Equinox | talk 12:40, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please be careful with this.  I've recently been embroiled in a long-winded, nasty situation over public domain vs free use images.   The argument at Tyrone Power was that because a substitute public domain image was located, a previously uploaded public domain image could be removed from the article.  After mediation, and intervention from admins etc, the ruling was that both public domain images had to stay in the article and the fair use images were culled.  Similar thing could happen here - if any images get removed from here it will be one or more of the screenshots, but not the GFDL image.  As per Tyrone Power, before the GFDL can be removed, every single fair use image will have to go first.   Personally I disagree with this, because this is not how I interpret what I've read about fair use and copyright laws, but all you need is for someone with a strong opposite viewpoint to get involved, and it will turn into a mess.  If you find another GFDL image, great.  But be sure to retain the showgirl image, rather than substitute it, which is what I think you're talking about.  Rossrs 13:13, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The purpose is that a more current image should be featured as the lead image, or so in my opinion. —Eternal Equinox | talk 19:29, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I think that if a new image was located, the showgirl pic could be placed in "Image and celebrity status" without much crowding (or if needed the image could replace "Kylie's cancer battle") -- getcrunkjuicecontribs 01:24, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead image

message: I have modified the chart positions (to include Hot Dance Music/Club Play) and the infobox (to use Template:Infobox musical artist 2) of this article at User:Getcrunk/Sandbox. Please comment -- getcrunkjuicecontribs 18:24, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks good! —Eternal Equinox | talk 23:43, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox and chart positions

message: Getcrunk, why have you reverted my small edit asserting that Kylie is a world-famous artist? Do you deny such evident truth? Are you perhaps jealous of her undeniable achievements? You argue 'length' and 'POV' issues - I think that is not true. I've NOT added to the article length with my SMALL edit, and the TRUTH (not just my POV) is that she is WORLD-FAMOUS. Period.
AVM 22:18, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:NPOV, WP:LEAD. -- getcrunkjuicecontribs 23:56, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undeniable facts vs. allegued "POV" 

message: I have listed the IBIY article at Wikipedia:Peer review. See Wikipedia:Peer review/I Believe in You (Kylie Minogue song)/archive1. Comments? -- getcrunkjuicecontribs 23:11, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Believe in You 

message: Why did you remove the "number one singles"? It's an important piece of information, and if you don't like the formatting you can always change it. Open for suggestions. CG 08:11, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is hilarious.  The article was put onto FAR several months ago, and I was told it needed a singles discography, so I added it, and it grew and grew to the point where it was too much, then it got reduced and reduced and then it got removed.  And now it's just how it was before it went on FAR. ;-) For the record, I would suggest restricting the list to number ones, and using the previous table format for both the albums and singles. Rossrs 09:58, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes we should only keep number one singles or it will get crowded. But I don't agree with the previous table format that I changed. It contains too many information (Do we need to know about South Africa and Iceland charts?) that are all found in Kylie Minogue discography. Please suggest a new format that would be used on all musicians articles. CG 10:20, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I didn't mean reinstate the United Nations column by column.  That's out of control.  Just the basic table format, which I think was fine, with either three columns (song title, year and AU/UK/US peaks) or five columns (song title, year, AU peak, UK peak, US peak) - and nothing more.  It could do with a wikilink, something like "For a complete listing of Kylie Minogue singles, with selected chart information, see main article Kylie Minogue discography" Rossrs 13:36, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wished there is a way other than a table, but you could always give it a try. List only the singles that reached #1 in either AU, UK or US charts. CG 16:36, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't have to be a table.  That would be my preference, but it was just a suggestion.  Rossrs 21:31, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Perhaps something like Mariah_Carey#Number-one_singles? -- getcrunkjuicecontribs 22:18, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a number-one singles chart based upon the MC one, with UK, AUS, CAN and USA peaks. -- getcrunkjuice 02:25, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good.Design 06:16, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you try to make the table white? And could you also make the columns in this order: AUS, UK, US, CAN (and if we get rid of CAN it would be better). Thank you. CG 08:33, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the table. What do you think? CG 19:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it looks kind-of strange. Like an HTML/plain text page instead of wiki. But maybe I just spend too much time here.. -- getcrunkjuice 19:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is it strange? I think that the white background is better than the gray one (it's my opinion at least). I just think that Canadian chart should not be there since it's a "minor" chart, and Kylie's singles have not achieved high canadian rankings. Mayb we could replace it with Eurocharts (even though there is a UK chart). CG 20:17, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number One Singles 

message: Aren't Greatest Hits and Ultimate Kylie compilations? Why are they listed with the albums? CG 11:24, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed them. Either we include all compilation albums or we keep main albums only. CG 19:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think they should be included because the article talks about them, they are "official" compilations, new songs were recorded for them, and singles were taken -- getcrunkjuice 19:49, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "official" compilations? I don't know. If you want to include them again I won't oppose. CG 20:17, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Greatest Hits'' and ''Ultimate Kylie'' 

message: Does anyone have any suitable recent photo for the article? I think it would be useful to show that she hasn't decided to wear a wig or anything. By any means, its useful to have a recent pic in its own right. - Рэдхот 20:03, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Photo 

message: :"During a Melbourne Football Club charity event with other Neighbours cast members..."
What kind of charitable event was this?  "Charity" linked to a disambiguation page, so I changed it to "Charitable Organization" as per the Wikipedia:Disambiguation_pages_with_links project.  Was this actually, a benefit concert?  If so, then it should say "During a Melbourne Football Club benefit concert".  Anybody know for sure?  --Crabbyass 02:25, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I found two sources.  One (La La La) calls it a "football fundraiser".  The other, which I've cited as a source, calls it a "benefit concert" even naming the beneficiary as a footballer named Alan Hardy.  Have amended the text and noted the source.  Rossrs 02:37, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charity Event 

message: "After playing the 'girl next door' in her early videos, Minogue began to touch on adult themes—an interracial relationship in 'Better the Devil You Know'..."
This sentence seems to suggest that racial mixing is an adult theme, and therefore innapropriate for children. I don't think this was the intended meaning. I've changed it to 'a mature relationship'. --Kinst 20:50, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interracial relationship 

message: Love at First Sight was one of the tracks in DDRMAX2: Dance Dance Revolution 7thMIX. Since there's no "Trivia" section, I have no idea where to mention that. Guidance? --Masamage 04:29, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say in the "Love at First Sight" article.  It's got nothing to do with Minogue herself. Rossrs 07:41, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, specifically the video is of her dancing very close to the camera. --Masamage 08:28, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Minogue has danced very close to a lot of cameras.  I still don't understand the significance. Rossrs 12:59, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh, sorry, that was unclear. What I mean is that it's not just the song accompanied by silly animations, which really would have nothing to do with her in particular. But the video accompanying the song is composed entirely of her dancing--so it's not just the song appearing in the game, it's Minogue herself appearing in it. --Masamage 19:23, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks.  I understand a bit better now. Well, it sounds to me that it's very peripheral to Minogue's career.  I think mentioning it in the song article would be appropriate. I'm very anti the prospect of introducing a "trivia" section because on the whole, Wikipedia is moving away from them. Rossrs 08:58, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll go ahead and do that, then. Thanks for your thoughts. ^_^ --Masamage 17:41, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dance Dance Revolution