Talk:Louise Ellman

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Louise Ellman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061003035345/http://www.dodonline.co.uk/engine.asp?lev1=4&lev2=37&menu=45&biog=y&id=25701 to http://www.dodonline.co.uk/engine.asp?lev1=4&lev2=37&menu=45&biog=y&id=25701
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070621155635/http://www.skemheritage.org.uk/ellman.htm to http://www.skemheritage.org.uk/ellman.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:59, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Louise Ellman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111002075036/http://www.manchesterhigh.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=307&Itemid=277 to http://www.manchesterhigh.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=307&Itemid=277
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:50, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I am a bit confused about this edit & wondered if anyone could clarify?  Diff  It appears that the reference to Ellmans comments regarding her defense of the assassination of Sheikh Yasin were removed, as they were lacking a "third party source". The source presented was a House of Commons transcript from Hansard.  However, contained within the same section is a direct quote and its single source is They Work For You.  The quote that was removed is also available in They Work For You. My question is, therefore, why remove a quote on the basis of a lack of sourcing, but allow the other to remain?  The sources are either sufficient for inclusion or they're not. It almost looks like the removal of information that could be construed as negative. --RebeccaSaid (talk) 09:51, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reinserted the comments Ellman made re: state sponsored assassination & inc. both sources, assuming that if my edit is reverted the statement that follows it, will also be removed.  --RebeccaSaid (talk) 08:17, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle East & related issues - sources?  

message: The article relies heavily on citations to Jewish Chronicle articles by Lee Harpin, one of which was in a set by him recently heavily criticised by the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO). Earlier, Harpin was one of the journalists arrested over the phone hacking scandal. Perhaps that mitigates against his articles being used as a reliable source?       ←   ZScarpia   12:55, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not sure if one can sanction an individual journalist: it is up to the publication's editor to maintain standards. Yes, the JC has been at the losing end of a number of regulatory and legal judgements, according to its Wikipedia article. It is a leading participant in the well resourced campaign to drive Palestinian sympathisers in the UK out of public life, so it is essentially propagandist, as well as performing a community role. You could try raising the issue here: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard Jontel (talk) 14:52, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source: Lee Harpin articles from the ''Jewish Chronicle''