lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:House of Fools (band)

message: Please indicate which elements of WP:MUSIC this band meets to avoid article deletion.  The label listed, is it part of a larger label that might be more recognizable, like Sony, etc? - CHAIRBOY (☎) 18:24, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ..Hope all is good there.
Tommyhaych 22:27, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Live and Learn to the discography.
Talk:Richard Dragon

message: According to the ravamped origin and history doen by Chuck Dixon, in issue #7 page.14 you clearly see the students he trained; The Question, Bruce wayne, Catwoman, Connor Hawke, Barbera Gordon, and Dick Grayson. Shouldn't these changes be posted under his "Student of the Dragon" - 
Debatable, but I'm leaning toward no, at least not until we get a little more info on what's canon in the "New Earth".  Honestly, pretty much every one of those students is a continuity headache... no, continuity migraine. As it stands, his interaction with Huntress in Birds of Prey seemed to be more consistent with the earlier version of Richard Dragon, and the Question appearing in 52 is supposedly the O-Neil version that was taught both to think and to fight by Richard.  Since we're getting references that Richard had been at a point in his life where he was "zen" enough to train those two hotheads, it's hard to argue that Dixon's story is still canon - at least not all of it.  You wouldn't necesarily be wrong for putting the names above on the list, but I suspect that, whatever parts of Dixon's series are still canon, the list of his students isn't.  Without more info, and considering the timeline and continuity difficulties that list raised, I think the best stance is to "wait and see" for a while.D1Puck1T 02:09, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Students of the Dragon 

message: When I edited that part in, I never intended the last lines to imply that Dibny was headed toward Parbat because Dragon and Montoya were there, just that he resolved something and requested that the helmet of Nabu take him there, the same location where Dragon happened to still be training Montoya. You could have left that in, especially if you are going to leave a slight recap of the prior issue in there, instead of hastily jumping on it as part of a speculatory theory in regard to Dibny possibly going there to confront Dragon or Montoya. 71.156.82.137 05:54, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  52 #27 
Talk:Lars Frederiksen and the Bastards

message: I deleted most of the text because the whole article (with the exception of the first paragraph) was taken directly form the epitaph website (http://www.epitaph.com/artists/artist/42) and I doubt whether it was done with permission.
The article states that the song "Marie Marie" is a cover of a song by MXPX. I believe that the original song was infact by The Blasters and that both MXPX and The Bastards have covered it. Febodyed 14:00, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ice Warrior

message: this is quite spooky.  i was in the pub last evening making predictions about what happens in season 3 and i decided that the ice warriors could well be introduced in s3s1.  is the paper channeling from my brainwaves?  Morwen - Talk 10:53, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And would it then be *boom! boom!* psychic paper? --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 11:38, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: press report

message: Hey, especially in light of the recent press rumors, think the Warriors should get a navigation box like those of the Daleks and Cybermen? --71.139.18.66 19:08, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure they have enough stories?  Someone suggested it for the Sontarans recently, they didn't really have enough. Morwen - Talk 12:34, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Navigation box

message: I know that a lot of the time Ice Warriors appear in armour, rather then showing skin. However I am sure that we could find a picture that features a group of Ice Warriors with a mixture of them wearing armour and perhaps without the helment to highlight their reptilian appearance. I don't want to spark a reversion war by simply changing the picture so I am going to open it to debate. Dr noire (talk • contribs) 14:54, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Picture? 

message: Isd there any information, canon or not, about what the Ice warriors call themselves - apart from the single reference to Izixyr using the "Ice Warrior" term? Totnesmartin 11:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Yeti (Doctor Who)

message: Considering the events of The Snowmen should this article be retitled and refocussed on the Great Intelligence rather than the Yeti, explaining its use of the Yeti, Snowmen and ice governess as its physical presence? Moochocoogle (talk) 23:41, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In theory I'd agree, but most of the information I've found looking through Google books and in other articles trying to spin this page into more of an out-of-universe look at the Yeti and Intelligence seem to focus on the Yeti, with the Intelligence being a little quirk of their back-story that gives them focus. Comics (talk) 00:40, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, this has been discussed on the Great Intelligence talk page and the result was not to merge Rankersbo (talk) 07:15, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consider moving to "Great Intelligence"? 

message: I just went through and tidied the article up, adding what I could to a new 'Creation' section, offering what discussion I could on the Yeti design and the changes between the costume of The Abominable Snowmen and The Web of Fear in a 'Physical Characteristics' section, gave them more of a 'History' section like other Doctor Who monsters and even added a 'Reception' section based on some information I found. I'm personally proud of it :) Comics (talk) 12:07, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tidied up
Talk:Enfield, New Hampshire

message: How could the first settler arrive AFTER the town was already established? What am I missing?--Filll 00:31, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Very interesting. I suggest it might be interesting to include that material in the article. --Filll 01:16, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please see the WikiProject New Hampshire talk page for background on the proposed merge of the Enfield CDP article with this article.--Ken Gallager (talk) 13:46, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 
Talk:Zygon

message: I double-checked my copy of Attack of the Graske, and upon closer examination I'm not sure if it is a Zygon.  It has Zygon-like suckers, but instead of having a row down the middle of its chest it's got two rows of suckers on two cords draping down from its shoulders.  I suppose that barring confirmation that it was meant to be a Zygon we should leave it out. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 23:12, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let Zygons be Zygons 

message: Could someone clean up/incorporate the "NB" notation that was inappropriately put in the "Print" section? The information may be relevant but the formatting is all wrong. I would myself but I'm unable to at the moment. Esprix (talk) 05:09, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, I was able to do so after all.  Esprix (talk) 19:49, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Print" clean up 

message: Was it Robert Banks Stewart? Who designed the original costumes? Should be in the article.79.94.252.170 (talk) 17:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who invented the Zygons? 

message: I've added a small amount of production information in the lead section (I felt a whole section was unnecessary given how little information we have on the Zygon's development) as well as a Reception section and a few sources. There were more sources I could've potentially used, but as I'm rather new to making these kinds of edits, I didn't wish to accidentally clog the section. For the future, I'd suggest keeping an eye out for further production information, as well as adding any sources that seem fitting for the reception section.  Pokelego999 (talk) 14:04, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Made a Few Edits
Talk:Islamic Society of Engineers

message: *If there's such a thing as vandalism on Talk pages, I think the above counts as an example.Bjones 18:56, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mangala

message: Mangala is a subdivision of the Agarwal jati. This should be noted in the article, and the article should not be filed solely under astrology.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agarwal
208.120.252.145 (talk) 07:48, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agarwal Baniya Ghotra 
Talk:Franconia, New Hampshire

message: Note that Alpstein in the Swiss Alps, also has an Altmann (Old Man). So possibly this connection was also made by the people naming the place. Student7 (talk) 00:41, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Another Old Man?
File talk:Areas of Somalia affected by the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake.png

message: This map was originally being used in the context of the Effect of the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake on Somalia. The blue highlighting in the original upload pertains to those areas affected by the tsunami. To prevent this map from being used in a more general context I believe it should be renamed. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 19:02, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you think the new name should be? --Siva1979Talk to me 03:51, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Gorham, New Hampshire

message: Please see the WikiProject New Hampshire talk page for background on the proposed merge of the Gorham CDP article with this article.--Ken Gallager (talk) 13:50, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 
Talk:Arranmore

message: I wondered if someone would pick up on this.
"British Isles" is a geographical term including the islands of Great Britain and Ireland and their associated smaller islands, eg, Arranmore, Isles of Scilly, Isle of Wight, Hebrides, Orkneys, etc. Life is not always that simple. Some, particularly in Ireland, feel uncomfortable with their independent or distinct nation being included in the geographical term. An alternative term might be "Great Britain and Ireland".
So, I reverted the change although it really doesn't bother me, I just used the term as it wiki-linked to an appropriate article, which explains the background. I did mean to say that Arranmore "natives" had dispersed to places in England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic, but this is not an elegant way of putting it. Folks at 137 19:06, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this is an old post but anyone interested should look at British Isles (terminology) for a better understanding of this issue. ww2censor 03:04, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  British Isles or ? 

message: The Arranmore Island transmitter article is tagged for questionable notability, so should be merged to here, especially as it might get deleted and can add to this article. ww2censor (talk) 15:09, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge done today. It has been outstanding for 11 months and no one has objected. ww2censor (talk) 04:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Arranmore Island transmitter

message: Have tagged a number of the issues with the article, probably needs a rewrite throughout, I may do some of the work soon but in the meantime this reference may prove useful.
Thanks,--RavensFists (talk) 12:54, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagged some issues

message: At 22 sq.km, Arranmore is smaller than Achill Island, County Mayo and Inis Mór, Aran Islands, County Galway, so cannot be second largest.
The Habitation section quotes a permanent population of 650, but the introduction gives a figure of 514 in 2011.
Edbt45 (talk) 16:51, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statistics
Wikipedia talk:Romanization of Russian

message: Can we please change the rule for Г(г) to clarify that (contrary to what I have found in several WP articles) его is pronounced yevo, never yego? It has been too many decades since I took an elementary Russian class for me to want to write the rule, but IIRC it applies not only to его, but to a lot of related words, as well. Peter Chastain [¡hablá!] 03:48, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: While I agree with your sentiment, I'm not aware of any transliteration that makes an exception for words like его, so it would be original research. 162.208.168.92 (talk) 20:12, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You can pronounce whatever you want: book-stylish with shapened noticeable "г", or casualy – without it. Because this morning this lanuage wasn't about phonetical terrorism of foreign speakers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.242.2.80 (talk) 18:32, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

text: While Г(г) in many places is pronounced as a hard G (Грозный = Groznyy), there are many words where it has the sound of v or h.  сегодня = sevodnya, not segodnya.  Петерго́ф = Peterhof, not Petergof. Гамлет = Hamlet, not Gamlet. It jars every time I read a bad translation in Wikipedia.  (I understand that Wikipedia is following BDN/PCGN, but if the intent is to give an accurate transliteration, garbling the word's pronounciation doesn't achieve this.) 73.189.125.249 (talk) 00:40, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Both «Петерго́ф = Peterhof» and «Гамлет = Hamlet» are against modern literary Russian. Perhaps, you are implying southern dialects or pidgins like surzhik. Tacit Murky (talk) 16:27, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Transliteration of the written word is not transcription of pronunciation. For the latter, see Help:IPA/Russian.  —Michael Z. 18:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romanization of его 

message: Please weigh in Talk:Korenizatsiia#Requested_move_21_August_2023. - Altenmann >talk 22:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "-iia" vs. "-iya" for Russian "-ия"
Talk:Grantham, New Hampshire

message: Grantham is a nice place to live.  Should we mention that Grantham is the fastest growing town in Sullivan County?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.67.86.147 (talk) 00:24, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, if it's true.  Do you have a source for that info? --Ken Gallager (talk) 12:23, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Population growth

message: Interested in Eastman, which is listed as a "community" across the town borders of Grantham.  Somebody want to whip me up a full wikipedia entry? :)
71.168.117.28 (talk) 01:31, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. I was thinking about doing this before I saw your suggestion.LorMcLor (talk) 14:32, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Eastman

message: * Intergenerational Community Valley News https://www.vnews.com/Business-Notes-May-15-2016-2144966
* Intergenerational Community Generations United: This is a blog post so won't hold up but... http://generationsunited.blogspot.com/2016/03/eastman-service-and-teamwork-across.html
* 40th Anniversary articles: This is a magazine published by Eastman so won't hold up, but it has the history. http://eastmanliving.com/issue/40th-anniversary-issue/
*Snow Hill at Eastman: former ski area closed: http://www.newenglandskihistory.com/NewHampshire/eastman.php
Not sure I'll be able to find any on-line references that will hold up.
--LorMcLor (talk) 18:53, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eastman-related sources
Talk:Nathan Jones (wrestler)

message: Removed the reference to his fight in PRIDE 1 being a work. There was no source cited.
Sherdog has his birthday as August 26, 1965 and his weight as 345 lbs - likely what he weighed in at for that fight. / Thorrune 01:54, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I got the 6'10" and 340 lbs. figures from Milo, which is a reputable strength training journal. The 7' and 360 lbs. numbers sound like his "wrestling" (in other words, exaggerated) size. Dsreyn 04:49, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

text: There's a link to this page as he is listed as serving time at Boggo Rd Gaol.  Is this the wrong guy?  The Gaol closed in 1989 and he was only born 19 years prior, could he have been in there at 17 or is this the wrong person?203.35.135.136 (talk) 22:14, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Work

message: needs a photo Dionyseus 22:27, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: photo needed

message: There is a new movie being released (Thai Comedy) called Som Tam (see youtube for trailer). Appreciate this is not on IMDB yet but should this be added to filmography?
Andyhiams (talk) 17:58, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New Movie

message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thTvRaV51rk&t=2m29s
In this video, recorded on January 2012 and posted February 2012, Nathan tells the interviewer that he's 45-years-old. On google his DOB is listed as 1967, here it's 1969, on Sherdog it's 1965. If he was born on August 21st, this would actually indicate that he was born in 1966. I'll leave it to other people to figure out which one it is, but 1969 is definitely not correct unless he decided to claim to the interview that he's older than he is for no apparent reason. 100.35.112.60 (talk) 17:14, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth must be incorrect
Talk:Greenville, New Hampshire

message: Please see the WikiProject New Hampshire talk page for background on the proposed merge of the Greenville CDP article with this article.--Ken Gallager (talk) 13:50, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 
Talk:Donkey Konga 3: Tabe-houdai! Haru Mogitate 50 Kyoku

message: I don't think use of a table is right for this, especially a sortable one. Is there a tag in MediaWiki to do 'proper' columns, like when you're viewing a category?--Pelago (talk) 23:47, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Columns for song list
Talk:T-Bone Walker

message: Cite:
"By 1942, with his second album release, Walker's new-found musical maturity and ability had advanced to the point that Rolling Stone claimed that he "shocked everyone" with his newly developed distinctive song (...)."
It implies that Rolling Stone assured it back then, 25 years before its first number.
189.194.76.14 (talk) 23:22, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newfound style 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.allmusic.com/artist/t-bone-walker-mn0000003829/biography. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 21:04, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Template talk:Chicano and Mexican American topics

message: Don't you think?  At least that's true on Win/Firefox.  Thought I'd consult without just changing...
:Fcendejas 23:42, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I have recommended increasing the text size also...--Rockero420 00:17, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The text looks great on Safari, but too small on Firefox. Maybe you could mess with the font some and try and find something that looks good on both, yet is as small as possible. --Bfraga 19:37, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm... little problem, as I only have a PC.  Sounds like a job for someone with access to both Safari & Firefox, eh Fraga?  --Fcendejas 19:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

text: I tried to fix the text size problem by a) setting the inherited font (defined in the infobox's attributes) to a fixed pixel size; b) setting a pc-friendly general backup font, since "lucida grande" is mac-only.  I haven't checked Safari, but with a cell-padding change, it now looks identical in PC/IE & PC/Firefox, except for the fact that wikilinks seem to always show up underlined in Firefox, and never in IE.  Maybe the parent font should be moved to something more universal instead of Lucida Grande? Fcendejas 18:21, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good on Safari to me --Bfraga 23:02, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  text is kinda small 

message: FYI, we have two choices now. This one is the horizonatal one.
See:  vertical infobox and horizontal infobox . Joaquin Murietta 02:02, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it's the reverse: Chicano/Mexican-American is the horizontal one and Chicano2 is the vertical one. But everything else the bandit says is true!--Rockero 16:15, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  We now have two templates... 

message: since this template is being used (rightly or wrongly) for people articles, it was resulting in the :Category:Chicano being wrongly added to people articles (see the purpose of the Chicano category.  Accordingly, I deleted this category from this template.
Thanks.  Hmains 02:34, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: use of template
Talk:Plasma scaling

message: In the section Cosmic application what does this sentence refer to:
The consequence of this is that charged particles moving in very highly magnetised space plasmas, are somewhat different to what is seen in the laboratory
I think this refers to magnetic fields in space being significantly greater than that which can be reproduced in the laboratory. --Iantresman 10:59, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: General

message: In the section "A commonly used similarity transformation", it would help to have a motivating sentence before the long chain of deductions starts. 
For example, can the reader assume that the basic rescaling is a rescaling of length, given by the ratio x, then view the others as flowing from that? 89.217.22.3 (talk) 09:21, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question concerning "A commonly used similarity transformation" 

message: The objection in this section seems to be so strong that it makes it look not like a scaling, but a mistake. 
A scaling transformation should take solutions to solutions. Is this really possible if the ionization ratio changes? Or are all plasma scaling transformations only approximate? 
(But only in the sense that the linear function x is approximately constant...) 89.217.22.3 (talk) 09:27, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Question concerning "Limitations"

message: This whole article is based solely on one reference, which is both theoretical and is unsupported by cosmologists or astrophysicists, and is the mantra of Plasma cosmology. It should be either removed as a deleted article or greatly cut in size. Arianewiki1 (talk) 07:55, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Notably, the plasma cosmology idea of 'plasma scaling' is different than the idea of what is stated here. Scaling uses a prefix for the scale factor, but for plasma cosmology scaling, this value must is a linear expansion. I.e Isn't true. It is likely this has been place here to deceive readers by supporters of plasma cosmology.Arianewiki1 (talk) 08:49, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: But it's literally word for word the same as the page found here https://www.plasma-universe.com/plasma-scaling/ DrBurningBunny (talk) 01:54, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Why is this plasma scaling not part of plasma (physics) ? It should be clearer in the intro. Needs a hatnote, or convert to a disambiguation ? It looks like a non standard use of the term "plasma scaling" - as in scaling laws in tokamak design. - Rod57 (talk) 12:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this plasma scaling not part of [[plasma]]