lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Al Rockoff

message: This article can use some cleanup and citations. For reals.
:What would you like? I saw Al this evening at Hurley's, he's there most days. PiCo (talk) 18:47, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  References for God's Sake and a photo of Al when he comes back to town. Cheers, Paxse (talk) 15:13, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Al loathes his Wikipedia article, I wouldn't dare raise the subject :( PiCo (talk) 00:45, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Is Al rockoff gay? 2600:8805:2722:1200:D889:38CE:F48:BFD2 (talk) 06:36, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @2600:8805:2722:1200:D889:38CE:F48:BFD2  Is it anyone's business? 125.238.48.13 (talk) 19:15, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cambodian grampa
Talk:Freestream (Cars)

message: I vote for merging this with the T1 article. Though this car began life under the Freestream name, the car had barely been announced Business Week (February 7 2006) when Caparo took over Automotive World (March 15 2006). More info at Racecar (March 18 2006) So the Freestream article is never going to be more than a very short stub. Assuming things develop as planned, then a seperate article on Caparo Vehicle Technologies will be needed at some time soon but at this stage of the game I think the car and company history should be considered one and the same. Mighty Antar 22:45, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Caparo T1]] 

message: Wrong.  It really is a Flow of fluids term.  Anyway, the article on freestream is too short, incomplete and narrow that it is almost useless.  Amclaussen.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.100.180.20 (talk) 19:52, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only an Aeronautical Engineering term?
Talk:Kelis discography

message: The table currently has 15 charts.  This needs to be cut down.  I'll do this myself in a few days if someone doesn't get to it first... just wanted to give a chance for others to give preferences for which countries get trimmed out.  Opinions? - eo (talk) 20:21, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Singles: 10 columns per [[WP:DISCOG]]
Talk:Fred Meyer Jewelers

message: According to the Fred Meyer Jeweler's website, all Littman Jewelers locations have closed (no date specified). Additionally, I couldn't find any Fred Meyer Jeweler's stores that isn't permanently closed on their store locator or through a Google Maps search. It appears to be open for online sales, but doesn't have a physical presence anymore. Perhaps this article should be updated with information reflecting this fact. https://www.fredmeyerjewelers.com/customer-service-2022 FlippingBinary (talk) 15:33, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stores closed?
Talk:Tom Wintringham

message: In the article on George Nathan, commander of the British Battalion for part of the Spanish Civil War it says
"the Brigade lost more than half of their men; 375 out of 600 died; including Tom Wintringham and Christopher Caudwell."
This page however has Tom Tintringham living on through WWII.
Which is correct?
I've also raised this on the George Nathan "TALK" page
Montalban (talk) 15:26, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did he die?
Talk:Dehns

message: The fact of the firm being the second-largest in the UK is not directly quotable from the CIPA List of Members - however it is easily verifiable from the List by counting the number of attorneys under each firm.  This is not the sort of statistic that is widely reported.  However, I very much doubt anyone in the field would dispute it.  Marks + Clerk is by far the largest firm in the UK; Frank B Dehn is second, followed closely by Boult Wade Tennant; there is then a sizeable gap before the fourth-largest and beyond.
"The firm, which is the UK's second largest, ..."
http://www.managingip.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=1326814
"Frank B. Dehn & Co. is one of the largest UK firms of Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys"
http://www.oxtrust.org.uk/organisations/16483
Orie0505 17:11, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Timematodea

message: I read Zompro 2005 and he assigned Electrotimema to Timematodea, but made no mention of Timematidae. , and as far as I am aware it has never been assigned to Timematidae. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Then whatever editor added the Electrotimema paper mischaracterized the treatment; I'll re-word it. Thanks. Dyanega (talk) 21:00, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electrotimema
Talk:Fox's Biscuits

message: This page desperately needs a disambiguation page, but a. I don't know how and b. is either topic worthy of an article? Thought it would be a good idea to have someone else take a look - thanks. Jessicapierce 01:20, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. I renamed this page "Fox's Biscuits" and created a disambiguation page at "Fox's". -- Bryan H Bell (talk) 21:23, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig needed

message: Ginger nut biscuits were invented in 1992? That can't be right, surely? Daibhid C (talk) 19:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to agree. Well I don't just tend to I definitely agree. Also my dad remembers sports biscuits from the 1950s so I'm pretty sure that section is wrong. It offers no sources for said information either. I've added citation needed to both dates but I think it should be deleted really. Nirejhenge (talk) 16:29, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ginger nuts

message: Out of the 3 Fox's Biscuits sites (Batley - Head Office, Kirkham & Uttoxeter), only Kirkham will remain operational.
2 options have been put forward :
a) Close Batley & Uttoxeter sites and build a NEW one in Yorkshire.
b) Close Batley and extend the Uttoxeter site.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.103.90.206 (talk) 20:45, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fox's Biscuits Closure 

message: McVities may be the brand leader but Fox's are the luxurious and tasty...yummy !  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.103.90.206 (talk) 20:47, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luxury ... 

message: Gettin' down and dirty with calorifiers: The new Spirax Sarco EasiHeat engineered system. Martinevans123 (talk) 00:07, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Spam|Hot water]] or not? 
Talk:Mary Frith

message: Some sentences in the section "An Eccentric Life" contain material that may be biased or reflects an opinion rather than factual information, which should either be removed or neutralized. This can be seen in sentences such as "However, Mary seems to have been given a fair amount of freedom in a society that so frowned upon women who acted unconventionally." Other sentences in this section lacking a citation could benefit from one for the purpose of identification/clarification of a source.    Mmesko1 (talk) 04:59, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I notice a tendency when evaluating some articles about people who are mainly of historical interest for being colorful characters to try to make them less colorful in the interest of what's perceived to be "encyclopedic." If we do that too much, readers will be wondering, "Why does this person even merit a Wikipedia article?" Is there any really objective reason why British eccentrics are remembered and liked by readers of history and literature? Pascalulu88 (talk) 16:09, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Neutrality 

message: The article states in the eccentric life section that Mary's uncle tried to reform her behavior by sending her to New England. I ask because she was born in the 1500s, and this part of the section, from context, appears to have happened when she was a child or young woman. But my understanding is that the New England geographic area wasn't known/explored/settled by whites until the early 1600s.
If this incident occurred when she was older, I could maybe see it being possible, although for a while settlements and colonies were few and far between. 
Is there a rederence for this fact that might shed more light on the time frame? JackMeraxes (talk) 02:45, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point! Pascalulu88 (talk) 16:10, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boarding School Reference
Talk:American Brands

message: this article seems to contradict the one for pernod ricard.  i don't know how to put one of those messages in the article, but someone should.Youdontsmellbad 06:21, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Some kind of contradiction in 2007

message: PLUS: Fortune Brands has split into two companies and the spirits and drinks are now running under Beam Inc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.114.137.176 (talk) 16:20, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The article already says that. —BarrelProof (talk) 19:50, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Company split-up

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
----
:Fortune Brands (1969–2011) →  – Per WP:NATURAL.  This company was known as American Brands for most of its history.  The current parenthetical is unnecessary. 162 etc. (talk) 17:51, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: — Advertised at WikiProject Brands.--18:41, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

text: — Advertised at  WikiProject Business.--18:41, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 August 2021
Talk:Fortinos

message: The article lists Hamilton and Stoney Creek separatelly.  5 stores in Hamilton and 2 in SC.  Since Stoney Creek is now a community in the city of Hamilton, I believe that the two stores in SC should be kisted as in Hamilton.  Norum 15:53, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to merge
Talk:Shortcut to Happiness

message: This film should be moved to Shortcut to Happiness as that is the title which it will be released as.  Anything else can only be considered a "working title" and should direct to the actual release title. Donaldd23 00:39, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: note: original article name was "The Devil and Daniel Webster (2001 film)", moved in July 2008, a full year after the film was finally finished and released in July 2007. Jmg38 (talk) 12:11, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Forest Laboratories

message: Devoting a full section to one news report on tax practices to an already tiny article about a company is almost certainly a violation of WP:UNDUE. More importantly, the headline "tax evasion" is incorrect and biased- there is nothing in the referenced news stories that even IMPLIES that the practice is illegal. Taxes are being manipulated through a loophole, yes, but there is no evasion going on. I believe in fair taxation as much as anybody else and would like to see the transfer pricing loophole closed, but that shouldn't be an excuse for someone with an ax to grind to throw off the entire balance of an undernourished article. Perhaps this should be moved over to an article about transfer pricing instead? ChrisStansfield Contribs 14:12, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Tax evasion" section.
Talk:Ford Lio Ho Motor

message: Someone has been changing all the "Lio" to "Liou" - this may technically be the correct romanization, but nonetheless the company goes by Ford Lio Ho. See here for instance. Best,  Mr.choppers | ✎  03:07, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Ford Lio Ho
Talk:Foodstuffs (company)

message: This statement doesn't seem to be true. Last time I was in Masterton New World, I saw the Biulding WoF and it said the store is actually owned by Foodstuffs Wellington, which means that the store cannot be owner operated - unless your talking about Foodstuffs itself.Laydan M (mailbox) 22:29, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's possible for the building to be built and owned by Foodstuffs but the business which leases it to be owned and operated by an individual or company. I know of two Pak'n'Saves which are privately owned. dramatic (talk) 10:18, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Owner operated?

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure)   ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:10, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Foodstuffs →  – No clear primary topic, Food has 69,325 views, the singular Foodstuff redirect has 230 (and redirects don't generally get nearly as many views as articles due to search engines etc not landing people on them) compared with only 1,650[] for the company. Google and Images return slightly more results for food in general than the company and Books doesn't appear to return anything for the company. Crouch, Swale (talk)  17:06, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 September 2022
Talk:Timematidae

message: I removed the redirect to timema and reverted it back to a stub, it shouldn't have been a redirect, it caused confusion on taxa boxes on other articles. Will be updating This article to improve it when I have time Wolfgang likes bugs (talk) 23:03, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: While the prior redirect target was not (no longer?) suitable, it seems that Timematodea could be ok as a target? Depends on what you mean by taxa box confusion. Although if there's substantial information to be written about the topic in article form then it's a moot point and by all means expand the article. signed, Rosguill talk 00:13, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What I meant by Taxa box confusion is that the page for timema listed timema as the genus then Timematidae as the as the family but then redirected you back to the same page. I do not think Timematodea would be good as a target either, as the spelling is so similar it may cause confusion as you may not realise you have been redirected. Currently I am collecting sources for this article before I start work on writing it. Wolfgang likes bugs (talk) 04:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah just reviewing the Timema article again there are some issues with the taxa box still, going to start a discussion there as well and figure out how to fix it haha Wolfgang likes bugs (talk) 04:23, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

text: I can see how it may be prone to confusion, although a saving grace of Timematodea is that there is a bolded mention of "Timematidae" in the middle of the stub, which would hopefully catch readers' attention. signed, Rosguill talk 15:08, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Thank you for fixing my mistake, apologies for the uninformed edits. Could you please direct me to the policy/rules regarding taxa boxes please? Wolfgang likes bugs (talk) 23:05, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted article to Stub
Talk:Quadra FNX Mining

message: actual name of company is kghm international ltd  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aight 2009 (talk • contribs) 12:56, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  kghm 
Talk:FMC Technologies

message: Added an infobox
Truman1177 (talk) 05:17, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: Reverted cut that eliminated the history section.  Don't go thundering around chopping relevant material with an axe.
--Smulthaup (talk) 04:00, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That was the unsourced material that garnered the  tag.  I've removed it again as such.  Per WP:BURDEN, please don't restore that material without proper sourcing and please address the tone.  The Dissident Aggressor 04:36, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: details about a lawsuit regarding four patent applications and the rights to these. Theroadislong (talk) 21:24, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible secondary source
Talk:Fluke Corporation

message: The 'title' of http://www.fluke.com is 'Fluke Electronics', while the name of this article is 'Fluke Corporation'. Which is correct, and how are these two names related to each other? E-pen (talk) 13:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Fluke Corporation' or 'Fluke Electronics'? 

message: The following quote from the article is very incorrect; "The transistor was very important to the electronics field because it made it possible for scientists to develop testing and measuring devices that were accurate to within one-millionth of a unit of measurement, or less".
There were numerous tube type devices, (meters, and bridges), at the time that would measure voltage, current, resistance, capacitance, and inductance to a few parts per million, and were made by Hewlett Packard, General Radio, Leeds & Northrup, and Brown Engineering Corp. (BECO), who later became ESI. The only thing transistors did was to make the test instrument smaller, be ready for use quicker, and improve upon the power consumption, etc. Todays transistors and solid state circuitry are still only measuring at or around 0.001% to 0.0005% at the best, and the majority are around 0.001% to 0.005% precision accuracy from the factory. The reason is, that other precision passive components, especially resistors, are used that are more accurate now than then due to laser trimming manufacturing methods.
You can reference a book by Fluke named "Calibration - Philosophy in Practice" for the same information, along with time lines showing accuracy gains. Also, one can read the correct volume from the National Bureau of Standards, or NIST, titled "Precision Measurement and Calibration, Electricity - Low Frequency", and the volume titled "Electricity - High Frequency", along with the book titled "Basic Electrical Measurements and Calibration" by Lawrence M. Thompson.--Craxd (talk) 01:39, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it's been a year and a half and no one has come along to defend this statement, I've removed it and the rest of the paragraph. Kendall-K1 (talk) 20:25, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect information. 

message: The entire article sounds more like a sales promotion than a technical or business article describing the company, especially its new owner. It does not show any citations or verification of fact. I caught the one on transistors the first thing off the bat, and someone experienced should delete the entire thing and start over.--Craxd (talk) 01:47, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, this article is pretty poorly done, and much of it reads like an essay. I took the liberty of removing / fixing a thing or two, but a re-write is in order. Drlegendre (talk) 17:38, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the current article was written by a Fluke employee, . It really needs a neutral editor to go over the whole thing. Kendall-K1 (talk) 20:31, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with all of you. I may try to rewrite the article if I can find some outside sources. Piguy101 (talk) 00:24, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  It needs completely re-written
Talk:Defenders (Ireland)

message: How about we just put an 'unsourced' header on this article? It's getting pretty ridiculous. -- Pauric (talk-contributions) 15:30, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 
Talk:Polyvalence

message: Multivalent and Polyvalent are both disambiguation pages, each pointing at the other.  I guess something should be done about this? Jeodesic 00:51, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not really clear that there should be articles on either of them. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Straightforward explanation of words belongs at Wiktionary, not in Wikipedia.--Srleffler (talk) 17:23, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multivalent / Polyvalent 

message: This page in its current form blends some element of a disambiguation page and elements of a dictionary entry. It gives a description of polyvalence in chemistry (which is already covered better at Valence (chemistry)) and then lists some pages that contain, or are sometimes discussed with, the word "polyvalent".
Wikipedia articles should be arranged by topic, not by words used to denote those topics, as described at Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary#Overview: encyclopedia vs dictionary. Putting these five topics together is therefore inappropriate. I'm not certain whether it would be better to recreate this page as a proper disambiguation page or to simply redirect it to Valence (chemistry), though I am leaning toward the former notion. Do others have thoughts? Cnilep (talk) 07:30, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I like the idea of using this as a disambiguation page. — Æµ§œš¹ [ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ] 13:18, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

text: . Cnilep (talk) 05:33, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hybrid disambiguation and dictionary definition
Talk:Timema

message: Even thought it may not match the proper gender, Timema poppensis is a valid name on ITIS and Catalogue of life and Timema poppense is not. There are 1700 hits on Google for Timema poppensis, and 9 for Timema poppense. Bob Webster (talk) 21:36, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Timema poppensis

message: The taxa box lists the family as being Timematidae, but it links to the sub order Timematodea?
for some reason Timematidae links back to Timematodea, despite being two different things, this is really confusing  Wolfgang likes bugs (talk) 23:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Reverted a redirect back to a stub for Timematidae, I am going to correct the family now, should I add in Timematidea as the suborder in the taxa box? Wolfgang likes bugs (talk) 04:26, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

text: I should also note, there is also a superfamily Timematoidea, by definition, also with Caudell, 1903 as the author. I have omitted this from the taxobox at present to reduce clutter, but in the eventuality that Timematodea is split into multiple superfamilies, it can be added in. Dyanega (talk) 16:16, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake in hyper links
Talk:Poems by Edgar Allan Poe

message: I'm creating this page thinking that it will serve as a useful index to the poems of Edgar Allan Poe. My hope is that I can (or others can) create full articles for the poems that merit them (without overdoing it) and leave the rest a part of this basic overview. If you do, just add the appropriate link to this page as well as to the EAP template. Midnightdreary 01:10, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, if anyone has suggestions for a better format or style, go for it. Midnightdreary 02:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New page

message: As I try to flesh out these entries a bit, I'll be adding more references. In the meantime, however, most of this information comes from Dawn Sova's book Edgar Allan Poe: A to Z, listed under the references section without page numbers. Her book is an alphabetical listing of topics related to Poe and is very inclusive, so most of his works (including the poems in this article) have a listing there. Just FYI. --Midnightdreary 17:21, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I sugested to every poem have its own article. --Vojvodaeist 20:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Or, we could just continue to use Poems by Edgar Allan Poe. If we had an article for each poem, we would have a lot of stubs that would never grow. --Midnightdreary (talk) 23:41, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article for every poem
Talk:Dee Ferris

message: I have removed some information per the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Visual arts/Infoart articles. This information should not be reverted as it violates WP:NPOV. More information can be found at the above discussion. Freshacconci 16:11, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of unencyclopedic content 