lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:TRS-80 MC-10

message: This appears very similar to the VTech Laser 200, and was also made in the far east.  Any connection ? 101.178.163.92 (talk) 04:34, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  VTech VZ200 

message: My TRS-80 MC-10 runs Microsoft Basic. I don't know if that was common or should be mentioned though.--72.29.232.74 19:21, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: My TRS-80 MC-10 runs Microsoft Basic

message: Hope everyone enjoys the new pictures.  --cbmeeks (talk) 18:45, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added many more good quality pictures of the TRS-80 Model MC-10 and 16K Ram Expansion -- [[User:Cbmeeks|cbmeeks]] ([[User talk:Cbmeeks|talk]]) 18:45, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:The Rifleman's Rifle

message: Audio dubbing doesn't explain the 12th shot. There was more than one opening, this one clearly shows 12 shots being fired. Most likely the fact that the blanks were shorter than real rounds allowed for a 12th round. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJj4YAAjHBI&feature=relatedTheJazzFan (talk) 06:23, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rifle clearly shown firing 12 shots
Talk:Peerie Willie Johnson

message: It has been proposed that Willie Johnson be renamed and moved to Willie Johnson (disambiguation) so that Willie Johnson can be redirected to Blind Willie Johnson.  Please discuss at Talk:Willie Johnson.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD)  14:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: The page used to say made recordings of his music (although never as a soloist). I'm not sure which source this came from, but it's not correct; the Willie's World compilation includes several solo recordings of him playing trad and jazz standards. Adam Sampson (talk) 23:10, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solo recordings
Talk:Robert Alan Jamieson

message: This article's creator and main contributor is Robert Alan Jamieson, who has not only created an article about himself, but has created articles about his work colleagues Dilys Rose and Brian McCabe.  All of these articles lack published third-party sources to give convincing reasons for notability.Austin46 (talk) 09:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know about the above point either way but on a perhaps related issue, I think it's ridiculous for a writer/poet to be ranked as 'Mid' importance on the scottish islands project, equal to some actual islands such as Little Cumbrae. Lord Spring Onion (talk) 22:41, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of Interest
Talk:WBGB (FM)

message: I'm helping with the backlog of articles that are tagged for neutrality. The template says "The neutrality of this article is disputed. Please see the discussion on the talk page." But I don't see a discussion on the talk page. Could someone who disputes the neutrality please summarize what are the issues that need to be resolved to restore neutrality. Thanks. Bluewave (talk) 15:07, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality discussion...where?
Talk:WOMR

message: I've added the "unreferenced" template, because no sources are cited for any of the information given here. Newspaper and magazine articles about the station would be a good place to start, and the station's website would also be valid as a source on the station, provided the information used is non-controversial, non-POV/promotional, such as staffing, budget, mission statement, etc. On that last note, there is a possible Conflict of Interest issue here, in that apparently someone connected with the station has been editing the article as a non-registered user. The use of the pronoun "we" indicates that this may be the case. I should note that the material added was neutral, but generally it is not a good practice (or even acceptable) for someone associated with an organization to edit that organization's article. Allreet (talk) 16:33, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article unreferenced and also possible Conflict of Interest 

message: The text under the heading "Funding" is repeated from the "Programming" section directly above and should be removed or updated. As a new editor I am not sure how to flag this. Chillforest (talk) 15:18, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  text repeated
Talk:Joe FitzPatrick

message: The image template states that 'No free image is available'. However, if one looks at the Scottish Parliament site and looks up Joe's details (http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/MSP/MembersPages/joe_fitzpatrick/index.htm), one finds the following ... "Download a high resolution image of Joe. It is a condition of use that you read and agree to be bound by the Policy of Use of SPCB Copyright Material." 
On inspection, the Conditions for the use of Downloadable Files would appear to be broadly compatible with Wikipedia's philosophy (see sections 9-11). However, I then find I'm too new to actually upload it. In a few days I shall do so and do the same for other MSPs unless someone can tell me why it's not allowed? :)
Meaning of Fife (talk) 14:14, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 
Talk:Diocese of Samland

message: "Bishopric of Samland" has been used considerably more often than "Bishopric of Sambia". Regarding the peninsula, English publications have also used Samland and Sambia in equal instances in my experience, so to claim that one is more "English" than the other would need some referencing. Olessi (talk) 23:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 
Talk:Jumbo (supermarket)

message: This supermarket chain is not related to the one in South America, owned by Cencosud.  Irdepesca572 19:42, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

message: A brief article on a defunct supermarket chain. While the topic is notable, the limited amount of information creates a situation where it is much better put to use in Jumbo (supermarket) gidonb (talk) 20:07, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Trung, as you say C1000 was its own supermarket. It isn't anymore. My nomination is NOT based on wishful thinking and questionable theories but reacts to the information that enwiki has. I said that there is no problem with the notability of the topic. You agree. After C1000 merged into Jumbo, the C1000 history is contained within the Jumbo history. There needs to be sufficient material NOW for a spinoff. Not potentially in the future. It's as simple as that! gidonb (talk) 20:21, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  C1000 was created as a pilot shot in 1977, it became an official supermarket in 1981, it was acquired by Jumbo in 2012, and the the C1000 formula was replaced by the Jumbo formula in 2015. So in its 38 (thirty-eight) year long history it has been a part of Jumbo for 3 (three) years. I can expand the stub if necessary, but for most of its history it wasn't a part of Jumbo Supermarkten B.V. --Donald Trung (talk)  20:32, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Trung Conceptually, this is totally wrong. The first question we need to ask ourselves is what is C1000. It is a HISTORY. Between 1981 and 2012 it was an ORGANIZATION, between 1977 and 2015 a BRAND. Since 2015 C1000 in its totality is nothing else than a HISTORY. This HISTORY is FULLY contained within the history of Jumbo as former C1000 supermarkets and corporate have become part of the Jumbo network and have rebranded/dissolved as an organization. Not just a few years. The entire history! This FULLY contained history must be visible and clear in the Jumbo article. If there is enough material here for SPINOFF, i.e. significantly more material than one would expect at Jumbo, then a separate history is justified. This confusion about what C1000 is (i.e. not was), shows in the article. It's a huge mess! Before, after, after the before, before the after. Please start with considering what you are writing about and keep all information chronological. Also for organizations (this isn't an organization), we really need to avoid recentisms. gidonb (talk) 17:25, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[C1000]] into [[Jumbo (supermarket)]] 

message: A brief article on a defunct supermarket chain. While the topic is notable, the limited amount of information creates a situation where it is much better put to use in Jumbo (supermarket). gidonb (talk) 20:14, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Trung, as long as all these companies are notable (you agree with me they are), it only depends on the amount of information in each article. gidonb (talk) 20:30, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Super de Boer]] into [[Jumbo (supermarket)]]
Talk:PZL.54 Ryś

message: Unusual to get Zero hits on Google. Does this project / drawing board fancy warrant an article--Petebutt (talk) 20:26, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: At best, it should be merged with PZL.48 Lampart - never went beyond a preliminary design. Pibwl ←« 18:52, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 21:36, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Bridgwater North railway station

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for this location. Judging from the text and an examination of online aerial mapping, it should be in the vicinity of the green field near the intersection of The Leggar & The Clink, Bridgwater.
—Useddenim (talk) 00:34, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed them after verifying the position on an old Ordnance Survey map. Tip: on the GeoHack page, check the OS maps links against National library of Scotland and Old OS maps - these maps are always pre-Beeching, and often pre-Nationalisation. --Redrose64 (talk) 10:52, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 
Talk:Operation Golden Dragon

message: Hello, I am currently a college student in Oregon. The Opereation Golden Dragon wikipedia article is my final project for the writing class. The class requires me to do reasearches, and contribute information into this article page following the wikipedia policies. I am new to wikipedia and still learning how to use, edit, contribute correctly so mistakes will be made. However, please give me advices and correct me if I am wrong. I am doing researches on this articles, please provides me with some information sources for the Operation Golden Dragon. Thank you! Khoamac (talk) 04:31, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation Golden Dragon project
Talk:Beth Clement

message: Is Beth returning to Hollyoaks at some point or is she supposed to have left for good? --Lifejunkie (talk) 16:51, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No idea - I don't think anything has been confirmed yet. ~~ [Jam][talk] 17:55, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Returning?
Talk:Operating room utilization

message: It does not make a lot of sense to have this section separate from the main article "Operating room management". Operating room utilization should be discussed there. Can you please merge the two contributions?
It does not make a lot of sense to have this section separate from the main article "Operating room management". Operating room utilization should be discussed there. In addition, I've just found another section "operating room efficiency". Same issue. Can you please merge all these contributions to one single integrated article?Wimed 20:17, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bodenham

message: How can a herefordshire village be in wiltshire at the same time? Objects simultaneously in two places at the same time? Is space-time folded in between them? A warp gate? has an identity issue..? Please enlighten. --maxrspct ping me  20:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiltshire
Talk:Steven F. Gaughan

message: This page should not be deleted as I am not finished compiling data or creating the page. Currently it is just a stub. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WAAFFan1073977 (talk • contribs) 20:10, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur with the article's creator.  It is my opinion that the naming of a geographic location qualifies this individual as notable enough per WP:PAPER.  While of little significance on a county, national, or international scale; it could be considered significant at a local level. --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 21:10, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contested speedy deletion nomination
Talk:Cornwallis's Retreat

message: This is just a notice to any one interested in this article that I will be developing a fully explained and sourced version of this article in my userpace over the next week or so, to be uploaded here once complete. It will be loosely based on the current text, but will be extensively sourced, expanded and rewritten. I note that there has been no serious activity on this page, but should any one have any comments, requests or questions then please notify me either here or at my talk page and I will do my best to respond and incorporated the results into the finished article. In addition to rewriting the text, I intend two major changes:
1) Unless any one can give a good reason why I shouldn't, I intend to move this page to Cornwallis's Retreat, which is the name for this battle in every English source I've seen. If it can be demonstrated that First Battle of Groix is a common name for the action then I would be happy to stand corrected, but I don't think I've ever seen it used outside Wikipedia (the battle wasn't even fought that near Groix - the accounts I've read put the start of the action further north off Penmarck, with Cornwallis reteating westwards out to sea).
::To add: Action of 17 June 1795 would also be an appropriate title, as Cornwallis's Retreat could be perceived as a little one sided.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:00, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I am now going to move the article I have created into the redirect Cornwallis's Retreat. I will move this talk page to Talk:Cornwallis's Retreat and redirect the exisiting article here. In a week or so the order of battle list article will be created, probably named Order of Battle in the Biscay campaign of June 1795 which will complement this article. I am still very open to further discussion on this article's title - I still have not come across non-wikipedia usage of First Battle of Groix however.--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:14, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice 

message: I suppose it's the form of the original writing in the 18th Century document for "furious attack" ? Wisdood (talk) 09:00, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ferious attack
Talk:Maysa Leak

message: Does anybody here know how to pronounce Maysa's name?  I haven't been able to find clues anywhere, including her Website.  Does it really sound the way it looks (MAY-suh LEEK)?
207.191.184.162 20:23, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On XM 71 (Watercolors), her first name is definitely pronounced MAY-suh. I've never heard anyone say her surname on that channel. — ¾-10 03:34, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation of her name
Talk:Blue Sky Black Death

message: *"Kingston began working on production seriously around 2002 [&] began his solo producing career around 2004." This isn't actually true. Between 2001 and 2004 Kingston produced under the alias 'Orphan' and was the main producer for the Plague Language label/collective, producing many of the tracks on Noah23's albums Neophyte Phenotype (2001), Tau Ceti (2002), Quicksand (2002), Sigma Octantis (2004), Mitochondrial Blues (2004) and Jupiter Sajitarius (2004), and also produced tracks for Baracuda, Penny, Orko and others associated with Plague Language at the time. There's been some kind of falling out between them and Kingston's history with Plague Language is never brought up in BSBD interviews, but it should of course be noted. Wetdogmeat (talk) 21:11, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Isn't the name a lyric from High Speed Dirt by Megadeth? 213.233.103.76 (talk) 15:17, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: http://fakefourinc.com/artist/blue-sky-black-death says they're based in Seattle.   The article says Bay Area.  The Dissident Aggressor 21:31, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I can tell, they started in SF and later moved to Seattle. I'm hoping to update this article in the coming month. Matthew Sylvester (talk) 01:46, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Kingston moved to Brooklyn a few years ago (https://web.archive.org/web/20150326020133/https://twitter.com/88ultramusic), no idea where he is now; he retired from music in 2017 (https://twitter.com/GsDodson/status/933384846461882369). Young God is now in Portland (https://twitter.com/0younggod0). -- Forty.4 (talk) 09:44, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for those two sources. I never heard any other source say they were ever based out of Brooklyn, could be this was after Kingston's departure. Thoughts on moving this article into the past tense with Kingston's retirement? AFAIK even though the website and MySpace are gone (both preserved somewhat on IA for citing) the BSBD "brand" is still active, with the Twitter and Facebook chattering every now and then, but this is probably just Young God (https://twitter.com/BSBDmusic/status/1237883846567153666). They did however press Euphoric Tape I in 2019 (https://www.facebook.com/BSBDmusic/posts/3064916033579967), and implied they were planning on doing the same for II and III, and maybe Stonedstrumentals (https://twitter.com/BSBDmusic/status/1072887002201116672). Matthew Sylvester (talk) 08:30, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seattle or SF
Talk:2MT

message: The cover advert for Wireless World magazine 25 June 1921 states that 2LV and 2LW transmitted concerts on Monday nights at 8pm BST on 1000m. The cover shows an image of the transmitter used and WRH Tingey offers the transmitters for sale. "Listen each Monday to our concerts." Subsequent issues of Wireless World repeat this claim. These adverts suggest that 2LV and 2LW have precedence as the first British radio stations to make regular entertainment broadcasts.
Wireless World magazine is available as a scan from the link on reference 1 with original copies in the Cambridge University Library.
2MT is referenced in the 4 March 1922 edition of Wireless World, with detail added in the 18 March 1922 issue. Reference 2. 
 Wireless World magazine 25 June 1921 cover advert. See page 39 of https://www.americanradiohistory.com/UK/Wireless-World/20s/Wireless-World-1921-06.pdf
Wireless World magazine 4 March 1922 advert. See page 11 and 69 of https://www.americanradiohistory.com/UK/Wireless-World/20s/Wireless-World-1922-03.pdf
Qwmdu (talk) 07:17, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2LV and 2LW may have precedence as the first British radio stations to make regular entertainment broadcasts. 

message: Why was it called 2MT? Headhitter (talk) 17:22, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of name
Talk:5IT

message: In updating the article, citing Briggs, I have removed this:
which has slightly different (and perhaps more specific; or actual rather than planned?) timings. If Upton was correct then Media in Birmingham also needs to be changed. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:58, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Times
Talk:Broadcasting House, Belfast

message: Is it designed by Giles Gilbert-Scott? DavidFarmbrough (talk) 04:59, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Restore open visits now in Maghaberry and Hydbank. Prisoners have not been able to see or embrace their love ones in two years. 2A00:23C7:8483:FF00:29CD:BBC8:5504:31D2 (talk) 18:52, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Republican prisoners visits
Talk:Adam Clapham

message: This article copies the wording of the source word-for-word.  It needs a clean up. --125.236.223.156 (talk) 09:59, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 
Category talk:Wikipedia non-free files with red backlink

message: I hope I helped by lowering the count to clear the backlog tag.
Most I found were still in user pages or articles in review.
If I should avoid fixing redlinks this way, please let me know. Canoe1967 (talk) 21:51, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Backlog 

message: Is there any way we can keep the templates from populating this category?--BirgitteSB 21:02, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering that myself. (Still a problem after two years!) — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:21, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is code on Template:Non-free use rationale that should only cause the categories to appear on pages in the file namespace, but it doesn't appear to be working correctly. Unfortunately, I'm not technically proficient enough to figure out where the problem lies. Reach Out to the Truth 18:25, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Templates
Talk:Bill Madden (soldier)

message: I suspect that the statement that "After the war ended, his unit was then posted to Japan as part of the British Commonwealth Occupation Force" is incorrect, or at least a bit irrelevant. My understanding is that the Australian contingent in the BCOF was volunteer-only, with members of the AIF needing to volunteer again for service in Japan (as this obviously delayed their demobilisation). If you can find a copy, James Wood's book The forgotten force: the Australian military contribution to the occupation of Japan 1945–1952 includes an order of battle of the Australian contingent of BCOF. Unfortunately (and oddly?) his NAA file is closed which makes it a bit tricky to confirm that he volunteered for Japan. Nick-D (talk) 09:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It was a bit of both. Interim Army people (who signed on as regulars instead of seeking discharge from the AIF) were transferred from the AIF to the Interim Army, then posted to BCOF. There was also direct recruiting among AIF and Militia personnel overseas and in Australia and of civilians in Australia. As you say, hard to tell without his NAA file, which would tell us what unit he was with. It could well have been part of 34th Infantry Brigade, in which case the source would be correct. Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 12:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for this. I'd suggest checking Wood's book to confirm whether Madden's unit was assigned to the BCOF (I thought that it was made up of specially-raised units, but might be mistaken) as that element at least can probably be confirmed without access to his NAA files. Nick-D (talk) 10:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day . I will, but for the moment I have just tweaked it so it states that he was posted to Japan. FWIW, there is an oral history interview with another soldier on the UNSW website here that says that 253rd Supply Depot Platoon was earmarked for Japan. Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 00:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  BCOF
Talk:Multrees Walk

message: Can someone tidy up the unit list please? 
J8149ZZ (talk) 20:03, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Units
Talk:A728 road

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved as uncontested; feel free to boldly split the article if you think that's best. (closed by non-admin page mover)  Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:05, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Glasgow East End Regeneration Route →  – for consistency with other numbered routes, and the East End Regeneration Route, whilst a large part of the A728, is not all of it. Possibly a split would be an option also. Eastwood Park and strabane (talk) 11:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 August 2022