Talk:Bartholin's gland

message: As my proposed change would affect this article I thought I'd post here as well. 
In short, I don't understand why these two articles (Bartholin's gland + bulbourethral gland) have an inconsistency in named vs. purely anatomical primary titling; in addition, I believe the attributive primary titling (like this article already has) is more appropriate.
Please share your thoughts. Robinson0201 (talk) 06:23, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomenclature

message: In a male-to-female and female-to-male sex-change can Cowper's glands and Bartholin's glands, respectively, be used to perform the function of Bartholin's glands and Cowper's glands?--Oxonian2006 10:16, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sex change

message: obviously the bartholin's glands are internal. this raises the questions: 1.what is the term for the opening on the surface that the excretion escapes from? 2.what is the term for what connects the glands to these external openings? are BOTH bartholin's ducts?
Gringo300 20:07, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: more info needed

message: It seems to me that the illustration currently being used leaves something to be desired...although the structures are adequately drawn, the way the female genitals are shown (particularly how the vagina is made to look like a giant, gaping maw) just seem rather Victorian and unrealistic. Wouldn't it be better to use a more modern illustration, or a photo (such as the one that's used on the clitoris page?) instead of this? I'm not necessarily saying remove it -- it's an interesting historical artifact, and this article does contain some historical discussion -- but I think it should at least be countered / paired with an illustration that's a little more realistic. Anyone else have any thoughts? It would be great if we could get some sort of close up or microscopy photo that actually showed the location of the Bartholin's ducts, but I don't see that happening. Kadin2048 20:13, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Illustration

message: In awe at last entry, let me respond. you're no expert in THE english language. humble enough. you at least get bugged by these little abormalities of THE language. minute /maI-'nju:t/  DIMINUTO (without API characters, normal keyboard) means very, very tiny. minute /'mInIt/ MINUTO means 60 secs. :) also, minutes /'mInIts/ ACTAS means the written registration of any formal meeting. well, grammar. so, even if you finger wildly, only relatively minute amounts of fluid would squirt from that particular region of THE anatomy. this right?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.156.150.26 (talk) 22:49, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  grammer off? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bartholin's gland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070112050338/http://summit.stanford.edu:80/ourwork/PROJECTS/LUCY/lucywebsite/vestib_gl.html to http://summit.stanford.edu/ourwork/PROJECTS/LUCY/lucywebsite/vestib_gl.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080804023201/http://health.discovery.com:80/centers/sex/sexpedia/bartholins.html to http://health.discovery.com/centers/sex/sexpedia/bartholins.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:54, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified