lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Seabrook Potato Crisps

message: They're getting more available in the South (there's a few supermarkets round us selling them), but only really a couple of flavours.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Milkybarnick (talk • contribs) 12:44, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it these crisps that come with a packet of salt that you put in yourself and shake it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sweetie candykim (talk • contribs) 00:08, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that's Salt 'n' Shake. Nick Cooper (talk) 12:35, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

text: No, they don't. Nick Cooper (talk) 12:54, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Packet of salt 

message: I looked at their site today and they only seem to be offering three flavours. They used to have far more; see the article. Equinox (talk) 01:20, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The Seabrook website currently shows only three flavours in the range. I was never entirely happy about the range of 17 flavours given in the article because it is unsourced, but it may have been correct at some stage. This source has the same list, but it dates back to 2001. The article needs to clarify this.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 05:26, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This looked like a job for the Wayback Machine, which has an archive of http://www.seabrookcrisps.com at various stages in the past. Here in 2007 mentions 18 flavours, while here in 2011 mentions some of the flavours which are no longer available. The list given in the article was probably correct at some stage but has not been on the market for some years. As a result of this, it has been removed.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 18:28, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

text:  Yeah, I specifically remember buying some big boxes of these crisps in 2006, which had a lot of flavours: you could make up your box (of 20 or 30 packets or so) from your own choice of flavours. (I've even got a photo of all these flavours filling up my little kitchen cupboard!) Thanks for looking into it. Equinox (talk) 21:37, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to all the flavours?
Talk:Causal system

message: the only thing I can think of is a digital filter that because of delays, gets hi-frequency information before the pulse 'hits'. PLEASE talk about this. CorvetteZ51 (talk) 09:03, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Help..what is NON-causal? 

message: The article lists:     y \left( t \right) =x(-t) 
as an example of an anticausal system...this is only true is t<0.
For instance, let t=1. Then the value of the output signal at t=1, y(1), is determined uniquely by the input signal at time t=-1, i.e. x(-1). This is clearly causal.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.15.81.250 (talk) 19:16, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect example in article

message: I happened to be studying for a Signals & Systems exam, and I noticed this article was a bit hard to understand.  So, I went ahead and tried to make the first paragraph a bit clearer, but I don't have the time to make the mathematical notation clearer.  I hope there is someone out there that can do that.
Nutshell:  Someone with math notation skills, please clean this article up.
Good Luck,
Pg8p 08:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Status of Article

message: This article could do well with a basic example to illustrate the concept more clearly.  A graph and a few equations would go a long way.
Good Luck,
Pg8p 08:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Example Suggestion

message: Is there any difference between causal and memory systems?
::This information from System analysis... hope it helps
::* Memoryless systems do not depend on any past input.
::* Systems with memory do depend on past input.
::* Causal systems do not depend on any future input.
::Best,
::Pg8p 08:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Causal vs. Memory Systems?

message: y(n)= y(n-1)+ x(n) seems also causal, nevertheless the definition does not include such a case. Can we make a solid statement on that? (My textbook could not clarify it either.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fonduesuisse (talk • contribs) 13:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dependence on the output?

message: It should be explained, that in this paragraph two definitions of causality are shown.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.130.44.166 (talk) 18:08, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mathematical DefinitionS
Talk:World Matchplay (darts)

message: Am I right in thinking that the term "matchplay" effectively has the opposite meaning to match play in golf? In match play golf it is possible to win even if the total number of strokes is more than your opponent, which is similar to set play in darts where you can win on sets even if you have won fewer legs overall. Matchplay darts (assuming that it means winning the most legs) would seem to be more similar to stroke play in golf. --Jameboy (talk) 12:56, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of the term "matchplay"
Template talk:Db-blanked

message: This was a redirect to  that was nominated for deletion. During the RFD discussions, there was general agreement that it shouldn't be a redirect with most people advocating for a revert to the 12 July version. I have closed the RFD nomination as such. Any remaining issues as to whether this is a valid template should be handled by TFD. Thanks. -- JLaTondre 13:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: RFD Closure
Talk:Simulated patient

message: Some statements in this article seem to be missing appropriate citations (i.e. in the article's very first paragraphs); are sources available for these pieces of information? Thanks, Emilyc44 (talk) 04:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question on References
Talk:Eric Gill

message: Both names are given in the article as his sister's name. Which is correct? 2A01:4C8:D20:B91C:1:1:9C53:5003 (talk) 15:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a typo. Thank you for pointing it out. Fixed. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:10, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Angelia or Angela?
Talk:Pella Palace

message: It is the reverter's duty to provide an appropriate reason for reverting. There is no reaosn to have an uncaptionned image when a caption is clearly helpful. Circeus 15:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide a link to WP guidelines which justify your whimsical edit. Thanks, Ghirla -трёп- 15:47, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide a link to a Wikipedia that justify your unwarranted reverting. If your only answer is "provide a justifictaion", which I did, you clealry have no argument in favor of having no caption. Circeus 15:53, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, you provided no justification. As usual, you came to another's article shouting that nobody owns it but yourself. Since there is no guideline justifying your ownership of articles written by others, I feel it my duty, as a much more experienced wikipedian, to rectify your unjustified edit and to restore the layout which I think suits the article best. Happy edits, Ghirla -трёп- 16:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Captions and stop 1) biting the newbies and 2) acting like you own the article yourself. Sasquatch  t|c 20:31, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reverted the anon edit. I cannot judge the orthographic changes (although altering the original transliteration is not very polite) and I'll leave that to Ghirla, who is certainly more competent than me, but the change of the link icon from russian to hebrew makes me think this was hardly good faith. Circeus 21:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure if Wikipedia:Captions is a guideline and who authored it, so I'll let the matter pass for now. I never bite the newbies, the so-called anon has had a long grudge against me. I don't believe that changing roubles to $ was a good-faith edit, as it triggered a comment by Honbicot below. --Ghirla -трёп- 06:40, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have stopped reverting his purely orthographical edits. Some article are at the given locations (Neplyuyev), others not (potemkin), and I don't feel like getting into a revert war over such trivial stuff. Circeus 15:52, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: caption

message: Exactly what sort of "$" is signified? The number needs some sort of context, or it might as well be random. Honbicot 17:48, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cost

message: Sources generally agree that Pella was built for Alexander (while his granny entertained plans to remove Paul from succession) - lede says it was Catherine's palace - did she ever lived there? Perhaps needs changing. Here's one version of events:  pages 281-288 NVO (talk) 05:30, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Catherine's ''residence''?
Talk:España Boulevard

message: The old names ae welcome but the new names should take precedence. The street signs use those new names, an hence were changed and are now widely used (although some old names are still used, for example, Trabajo). --Howard the Duck 14:00, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old names
Talk:HMAS Vampire (D11)

message: I've removed the following Navy News articles from the References section, as they are not cited in the body of the article. -- saberwyn 07:38, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Navy News articles 

message: I think the Royal Exhibition Building in Melbourne is the largest item in a museum collection in Australia. 175.45.149.10 (talk) 20:26, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest museum object
Talk:HMAS Voyager (D04)

message: This article has been tagged as not citing its refences.  What the? Nick Thorne 21:05, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Someone with more knowledge of their fate than I might like to add a section to this article about the history of the survivors of this tragic accident and their struggle for recognition and compensation. Nick Thorne talk 08:23, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Plus one civilian dockworker mentioned in the sentance after the one you quoted. -- saberwyn 21:42, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Victims

message: "On 12 March 1956, several gallantry awards were conferred..." I guess that should be 1966? Or '76? Anyone know for sure? Rumiton (talk) 13:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The London Gazette listed the date as 19 March 1965...our error is probably a case of too-fast fingers. Now fixed. -- saberwyn 23:34, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Awards

message: plenty of images on web, including naval site Dave Rave (talk) 18:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  image 

message: This ship never operated under the Australian White Ensign, it only ever flew the Imperial/ Royal Navy white ensign during its service in the RAN. Should the box be changed? Ozdaren (talk) 08:33, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info box white ensign
Talk:Ghisolfi

message: That Ivan III is called czar in this article, coupled with numerous spelling mistakes, casts doubts on the valdity of its content. --Ghirla -трёп- 13:26, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See the article on Czar. Ivan III did use the title in correspondence etc. Ivan IV was the first to formally incorporate the title in his coronation. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 15:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yaroslav the Wise also used this title, but we don't call him tsar, do we? By the way, don't you think that Zacharias de Ghisolfi is better be split into separate article? --Ghirla -трёп- 16:08, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So we don't have to call him Czar if you don't want to. My point was that the quotation from Ivan's letter is not in se unreliable because it uses the word Czar, as Ivan III did use the title. I'm not sure that there is enough info to warrant splitting Zacharias off but I'm not opposed to the idea. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 18:25, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: #Well-written: Pass
#Factually accurate: Pass 
#Broad: Fail 
#Neutrally written: Pass
#Stable: Pass 
#Well-referenced: Pass
#Images: Pass
There are things that I could pick apart on this article, and I would not pass it anyway, but I won't even get to them, because this article has a very glaring problem.  The article name is "Ghisolfi", and the lead talks about the Ghisolfi family, and what it was and when it was, but then the rest of the article is about Zacharias de Ghisolfi.  As the title of the article is not Zacharias de Ghisolfi, that is a problem.  Move the article to Zacharias de Ghisolfi, change the lead to talk about him rather than the family he was a part of, and try again.  --PresN 04:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GAC
Talk:Byron, London, Ontario

message: The current picture doesn't reflect the look and feel of the beautiful urban area of Byron. It just shows a sign and the fire building. Not a great picture. 142.113.108.221 (talk) 03:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change main picture
Talk:HMAS Nizam (G38)

message: I uploaded a photo of HMAS Nizam on Wikimedia Commons.
 
Sv1xv (talk) 15:47, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: I've removed the claim that Sir Osman Ali Khan, The Last Nizam of Hyderabad paid for the construction of the ship, and consequently the ship was named after him. This claim has been uncited since at least 2011. If sources can be found that prove this claim, it can be readded. -- saberwyn 05:11, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Payment claim removed
Talk:You Wanted the Best, You Got the Best!!

message: I like the fact that in the main paragraph the overdubs are not treated as certain fact "...there is some speculation to whether this is actually the case (mainly because Paul & Gene's voices sound like they were re-recorded in 1996 and Peter's drums sound very modernized)"
What disturbs me is that in the track listing, under Origin, the overdubs are listed as fact. What gives? Which viewpoint is correct? Is there a source (better than a non-committal interview with B. Kulick) that confirm these overdubs? FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 14:56, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overdubs
Talk:Vukovar

message: Is there any connection with the Seriban вук or Croation vuk, the words for "wolf"? Interlingua  talk email 13:41, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 
Talk:Alwoodley

message: This is mainly estate agents' guff, possibly by one of the Leeds firms which gives a link to Wikipedia.  There are unsourced opinions mainly about housing.Chemical Engineer 20:38, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Flow cytometry

message: The section on Data Analysis never really explains what exactly is being measured. The image shows several graphs with x and y axes whose units are never defined. What do the dots represent, and how is that data interpreted? It seems the main ideas have been lost.
Emmieleigh (talk) 04:26, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Data analysis should be better explained 
Talk:HMAS Norman (G49)

message: H.M.A.S. Norman was returned to the Royal Navy at the end of WWII intact to be laid up in ordinary.  In the description of the N-Class destroyers, the text talks about her complement at the time of her SINKING.  It appears a cut and paste from another article was inserted accidentally.99.49.38.60 (talk) 18:30, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for catching that. Looks like some standardised information for the N-class was copied over from HMAS Nestor (G02) (which did sink), and was not sufficiently tweaked to correspond to this article. Fixed now. -- saberwyn 00:20, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting information on article for H.M.A.S. Norman
Talk:Heaven Knows, Mr. Allison (novel)

message: This book has a proper ISBN: .
There are sites ("online text" and "online databases") that know this ISBN, there are some that don't.
Sites that know the ISBN resp. the respective ISBN retrieval URL:
* https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=isbn:9785510895186
* https://www.worldcat.org/search?qt=wikipedia&q=isbn%3A9785510895186
* …
Site that do not know the ISBN resp. the respective ISBN retrieval URL:
* http://www.amazon.com/s?search-alias=stripbooks&field-isbn=9785510895186
* https://openlibrary.org/search?isbn=9785510895186
* …
:Template:Infobox book certainly applies, I just can't see that it mentions the case that amazon does not know an ISBN and therefore the ISBN should get removed from the infobox and the article.
By repeated removal of the ISBN of this book from the infobox User:GrahamHardy proved that he behaves like a vandalist.
I also made him aware of the situation as shown above, and by his reply at User_talk:GrahamHardy#removing_a_working_ISBN he showed he is in fact aware of the situation.
Nevertheless he insists on his wrong behaviour.
I think the community does not and can not tolerate such behaviour
and it should act against individuals behaving like this. --johayek (talk) 13:38, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Added ISBN with note...GrahamHardy (talk) 10:46, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISBN
Talk:State Road 573 (Florida)

message: Okay, there are clearly some issues regarding this article. It's pretty much a stub at this point and could use some expansion, especially on the history. More information is needed regarding the former Tampa Jai Alai Fronton, including an opening date. I'm not sure if there any more issues that need to be resolved at this time. Wslupecki 13:56, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Yes, I know this issue is going to be brought up sooner or later. I will probably end up merging this article with the Dale Mabry Highway article in the near future. Wslupecki 02:12, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging with [[Dale Mabry Highway]]
Talk:HMAS Vampire (D68)

message: I've added some references for most of the text on this page, they are all from the book Battleship - The sinking of HMS Prince of Wales and HMS Repulse, which is also listed as a reference source below that. It's my understanding that this book is generally regarded as the definitive work on the subject. I'm assuming these will be suitable? 
There's still a need for references for the construction and early life of HMS Vampire, and also for the account of her sinking --Andy Wade 21:30, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:KAAA

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the code reference to an airport is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the airport. - Dravecky (talk) 07:27, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:HMAS Vendetta (D69)

message: The Scrap Iron Flotilla article mentions this ship, but this article, unlike the other 4 ships in that article, does not mention that term. Probably it should. I leave it to more expert editors to make the change. --DThomsen8 (talk) 21:51, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scrap Iron Flotilla? 

message: The article refers to her conversion to an escort destroyer (with halving of gun armament, deletion of torpedoes and increases to A/S and light AA armaments), but it appears that Vendetta went through several interim armament fits. Cursory glances at early wartime photos indicate that her after bank of TTs was deleted by 1940 at least and one or two quadruple Vickers .5 mgs were shipped at that time, whilst a 1945 photo of pre-surrender negotiations aboard her at Rabaul clearly show a Bofors gun in a single mounting - although how many of these weapons were mounted is not clear.
Does anyone have clearer information regarding this which would help to fill out and improve this article about a historically significant ship? 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:8D82:AF68:5320:71A (talk) 21:05, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armaments
Talk:HMAS Voyager (D31)

message: Original entry claims Voyager took part in the sinking of the Italian submarine Argonauta on 29 June 1940. However according to Stevens 2001 p. 112 and Gill p. 167 it was actually the Uebi Scebeli. Argonauta was sunk on 28 June 1940 by an RAF Sunderland aircraft. Anotherclown (talk) 04:55, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sinking of Italian submarine Argonauta
Talk:JDeveloper

message: I have removed the NPOV tag in this article because the person who tagged this article did not respond to my query on his talk page. --Ghormax 14:07, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

message: The comparison with other IDE's article added nothing substantive.  Why would one choose this IDE over eclipse for instance?-G (talk) 22:00, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing why this is better 
Talk:HMAS Warramunga (I44)

message: Don't forget to add that the ship rescued the 34 survivors of the Taiping and the 2 survivors of the Chienyuan on January 27 (or was it 28? I don't know.), 1949! 2601:181:400:470:1979:C868:2AE8:5B3B (talk) 02:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  An important note.
Talk:Jane Engelhard

message: According to the archives at Ellis Island, Hugh Reiss spelled his surname REISS. That same spelling was utilized by his wife, Mary, when she was photographed by Arnold Genthe in 1919. Therefore, the family's spelling of the surname appears to be correct; if you have any other comments, please write so this can be worked out. Until then, the surname should be spelled REISS as per official government documents. Mowens35 14:12, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This first paragraph of this section has all sorts of problems. It begins "Diamond Invention book - author Edward Jay Epstein," which appears to be the source of the rest of the paragraph, but it makes no sense in the sentence. The rest of the paragraph may be taken from that book verbatim—can anybody verify this? Anyway, it doesn't flow into the following paragraph at all. It's not clear if the Charles mentioned here is the same as the Charles Jr. from the third paragraph, or if this one is the Father of the other. On reading the article on him, they both seem to be the same person. If so, both paragraphs shouldn't introduce him. Also, it's a charming, colorful bit of history, but it really belongs in the article on Charles Engelhard, not this one. I would make that move myself, but I don't have the source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MiguelMunoz (talk • contribs) 20:15, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Postwar Life and Second Marriage 
Talk:KACE

message: Who are you and why do you keep changing this page?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaceuser (talk • contribs) 19:03, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am someone who has read WP:DISAMBIG guidelines on how to handle this exact situation. DMacks 19:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, now we have something in common :-).  I disagree with your interpretation of the article.  Please outline why you are making this change when I have offered you real evidence that more persos are interested in KACE (company) than KACE (radio station)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaceuser (talk • contribs) 20:01, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Both the radio station and the networking company have their pages, and this disambiguation page can be expanded if needed. I hope we are all satisfied now. --Orange Mike 21:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Who are you?
Talk:Magnesium nitride

message: The sentence "As all metal nitrides, it reacts with water to produce ammonia gas." is misleading.  It appears that the author is saying all metal nitrides produce ammonia gas when reacting with water, when what is really meant is that all metal nitrides react with water to produce some product (not necessarily NH3). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 148.141.31.123 (talk • contribs) .
:Good point. Why did you remove this comment after you made it? —Keenan Pepper 16:35, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

message: i need to rollback an edit I recently made to ybis article. I tried to reformat tge reference to match thetypical format usedin Wikipedia, but it went bad because of a wrong transcription. I need to restore the previous version to try again. Thank you. Olthe3rd1 (talk) 16:34, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roll back an edit