Talk:Ivan Vasilievich: Back to the Future

message: :Image:Ivanvasil.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ivanvasil.jpg

message: The current title of the page, Ivan Vasilievich: Back to the Future, has nothing to do with the actual title, Ivan Vasilievich Changes his Profession. There is literally no reason for the article to be named the way it is now. Please edit out this falsity.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.158.196.42 (talk) 17:01, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support. KNewman (talk) 18:25, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ivan Vasilievich: Back to the Future. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120510033800/http://www.kinokultura.com/plus/prokat2.html to http://www.kinokultura.com/plus/prokat2.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:44, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ivan Vasilievich: Back to the Future. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928041029/http://russart.com/?movietrailer&mid=4 to http://russart.com/?movietrailer&mid=4
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930185558/http://russart.com/?moviepictures&mid=4 to http://russart.com/?moviepictures&mid=4
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Large parts of the sections headed "Trivia" and "Deviations from the original play" are unnecessary, or at least do not deserve as much space as they have gotten in an article of this size. I'm not opposed to keeping the sections, but if we choose to do so, I believe we should expand on the more relevant sections such as Plot, and modify these fluffier sections to bring them into line with the general Wikipedia convention for movies, such as having sections on production and reception. We could, for example, expand the "Locations" section into a section on the whole production, and incorporate into it some information from the "Deviations" section regarding the history of the Bulgakov play. I'd like to hear other opinions, though, in case this idea is considered unnecessary.
Zacherymoe (talk) 14:13, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevant sections? / Wikipedia convention 

message: Hi! The current title surprised me when I went looking for the English Wikipedia article on this film, as the actual title, "Иван Васильевич меняет профессию", is obviously not "Back to the Future". It appears that the only source for "Back to the Future" is this, which is neither a reliable source or particularly useful for titling this article. I'm proposing an alternative of "Ivan Vasilievich Changes Profession", though "Ivan Vasilievich Changes Occupation" would also be accurate. Best, Vermont (talk) 16:28, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed rename