lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Clinical neuropsychology

message: In response to the crtiticism of the article not reflecting an international perspective, I seperated the information relating directly to the US and the information related to clinical neuropsychology in general. I haven't yet made any changes to these sections, but I will.
I added a section relating to the educational requirements of becoming a clinical neuropsychologist in Australia. More countries to come.
If you know this information for other countries, please feel free to add this and please add refernces to back up the information.
MitchMcM (talk) 10:41, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Changes 

message: All of the information was in a large chunk, so I moved it under a subheading so that a lede can be written. The information still needs to be divided up under sub-headings though.
I made a fair few minor edits and rewrote some sentences that were a bit awkwardly worded.
I also removed some information about Ed.D. being an appropraite qaulification for a clinical neuropsychologist. To my knowledge thats not the case, but I may be wrong, if so please replace this in the appropraite country's section with a reference. 
MitchMcM (talk) 05:25, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structural changes 

message: Still very much a page "under-construction/revision". Information additions, revisions and deletions still to come. Other editors welcome!!
MitchMcM (talk) 13:09, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  University Lists Added for US/Canada 

message: I rewrote the whole unreferenced Assessment section with referenced material. I cut and pasted the previous information, so I'll replace any of the important info that I find references for. There is definitely more that can be added to all of the new sections, especially the section on selection of tests. When I get time I'll also add sections on employment setting and rehabilitaion too. 
In the meantime I welcome any advice/comments/edits from other users- sometimes it feels like I'm the only one on this page.... The page could benefit from a greater variety of references. I removed the unreferenced tag as the page is now quite well referenced, if you add any information please reference it or it will be removed, as it took me several months to remedy the problem of unreferenced material.
MitchMcM (talk) 01:28, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Section 
Talk:Marlene Schmidt

message: Looks like this was translated.  Somebody should clean it up.
Would love to, but the page is locked and there is no one to go to and unlock it.  It's a waste of my time to try and get permission from the author to go into this area.
Wikipedia does it to deter vandals, but it sure deters editors from cleaning things up! Mschneblin (talk) 23:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: translated
Talk:Ecological psychology

message: I added references to some of Barker's major publications.
Profallan (talk) 22:47, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: References added

message: This section has grown out of control, so I moved it from the article into the talk page. Please see Wikipedia:Further reading and put only entries that are topical, reliable and balanced, and keep the section limited in size. "Wikipedia is not a catalogue of all existing works." Also, if you wish to add an entry back into this section, please motivate why. Thank you! Lova Falk talk 12:32, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further reading 
Talk:Theoretical psychology

message: I had some ideas for sections that could be added to this page. Basically, I'd like to introduce some common topics/themes discussed in theoretical and philosophical psychology. Does anyone else have any other ideas for this page? Urstadt (talk) 05:40, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Ideas for Sections

message: theres this section titled importance or relevance or significance basically dealing with the question "what is this good for?" this section reaches a conclusion at its end saying that it must be good for something after all: "Theoretical psychology can be extremely beneficial because it brings together scientific ideas and philosophical ideas of psychology. Integrating these ideas contributes to the knowledge of psychology." which after cutting through the unsubstantial big words boils down to "TP could be of some use after all because it brings stuff together. bringing stuff together contributes to stuff." i am really sorry to express such a concern but this sounds about as substantial as thin air. i dont know if the field of TP is such a hocus-pocus or it is just the article but this does not sound as a convincing argument about the usefulness of theoretical psychology. it is either some marginal field on the verge of being pseudoscience or the article makes it a poor service by promoting it like it was that.89.134.199.32 (talk) 21:33, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  not much to hold
Talk:Sicilian-American

message: Should this and Sicilian-American be merged?--T. Anthony 16:32, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm sorry but despite not being from America I have an interest in organised crime, particularly in NYC, and from readings books, looking on the internet and watching TV programs and films the reason that the Sicilians get abused is simple, as well as starting up the mafia they're now coming to America and commiting all the gangland murders in America. They were involved in America's heroin problem in the 1970s and so it's understandable why they're shunned if now hated. 
JBAK
:Gee unspecified books, the Internet, and TV programs. How can one argue with that? Anyway I don't think this denies that the mafia is disproportionately Sicilian, just that most Sicilian Americans have no role in it. If the figures are accurate there's 12 million Sicilian Americans and last thing I recall it's unlikely the mafia represents more than a 120,000 people.--T. Anthony 22:48, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Prejudice
Talk:Tino De Angelis

message: I have assessed this article according to the biography criteria as being "class start" and low importance as, at this moment in time, such an assesment seems to be appropriate in view of the asessment criteria and the artices content and subject. -*- u:Chazz/contact/t: 14:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assesment

message: There's no recent information appearing online about him, so it's impossible to know if he's still a living person or not. Will stay at Confidence trick#Living people as the oldest living person in the list. -Mardus 04:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He was born in 1915, so it is possible that he could still be alive. Our policy in areas like this is to assume the subject is living until proven otherwise, or assume they are dead once they would be more than 123 years old (the age of the oldest human being on record). See :Category:Living people for more information. Terraxos (talk) 16:12, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Individuals over 90 can go in :Category:Possibly living people, which I feel is most appropriate for this individual. Cheers, CP 21:51, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any recent information? 
Talk:Belle Cole

message: Not sure exactly why this would be tagged as unnotable. Sure 58 unique Google hits is not great, but we're talking about a 19th century opera singer here. Chances are she's not too often on the cover of Rolling Stone. Pascal.Tesson 16:35, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Inertia (disambiguation)

message: Isn't there inertia in theatre?
Is there anyone kind enough to add an article for it? Arthur 16:39, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What? Sir, you're not making any sense. ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 18:30, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

text: >.> You weren't making sense. My response wasn't even in the same category as rude. If you think telling someone they're not making sense is rude...well...good luck to you, Art. It only goes downhill from there. As for an inertia (play), I haven't found anything. Wikipedia doesn't have an article for everything. ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 15:23, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I wasn't speaking literally, dude. Look, this is what I'm talking about. You think telling someone they're not making sense isn't constructive? Should I have just ignored you, then? ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 16:47, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

text: If you're serious, I'd recommend looking past what you see as "rude" behavior and try to be more clean in your writing, at least in the future. My comments were vconstructive, from the very beginning. When someone tells you that me I'm not making sense- guess what? I try harder to make sense. No defensive reaction. Now, despite your...youness, I'll be glad to help. Do you have a source for "inertia on plays"? >.> ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 17:05, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Inertia in theatre?
Talk:Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence

message: I have posted a bibliography of   Intelligence Citations for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in those issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research and to suggest new sources to me by comments on that page. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 16:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intelligence Citations Bibliography for Articles Related to IQ Testing 

message: I think (after googling "www.wppsi.com" and seeing which pages refer to it and what they say about it) that the site referred to is the same as (currently available) http://www.wppsi.net/, not 100% sure though.
140.166.130.77 (talk) 15:46, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  dead link wppsi.com 

message: This article refers to the WPPSI-3, published by Harcourt Assessment. It appears that there is now a new edition, WPPSI-4, published by Pearson. However, as this is the extent of my knowledge about this instrument, I have not edited the page to reflect the new edition. The current entry describes some of the changes made to the instrument in the 3rd edition, and I am not able to update any of this information.  
Streakoflight (talk) 23:39, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  new edition of WPPSI 

message: Re: the March 9, 2015 post by streakoflight - The WPPSI-IV (Fourth Edition) was published by Pearson in 2012.  Since the previous post says s/he cannot update the article, I am assuming s/he wrote it.  The information on changes in WPPSI-IV is available on the Pearson website's page for this product.  Can't somebody else use it to update this article, which is now out of date by three years?  If anything I have written here betrays ignorance about Wikipedia, I apologize and request forgiveness.  Thanks!
Gailcats (talk) 09:11, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WPPSI-IV
Talk:Michael F. Jacobson

message: Michael Jacobson refer to himself as "Michael F. Jacobson, PhD" so it's only natural to merge approriately. Google search for the former are confusing at best , with mostly an eclectic mix of non-related persons (presumably) and detractors, as opposed to a proper search . It could also easily be confused with Michael J. Jacobson, Ph.D. I've removed large chunks of pov recently so I'll wait for opinions on weither it's appropriate for me to merge. Jean-Philippe 16:46, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge from Michael Jacobson into Michael F. Jacobson
Talk:Tilden's Laws of Robotics

message: This is my first attempt to contribute to wikipedia, so please be kind to the new kid. The article has been marked as "non-notable, outside a narrow interest group or constituency, or should be because of its particular importance or impact."
I simply don't see how this can be the case. I only created the page because I was surprised to find that wikipedia didn't already have such an entry. I created a seperate entry because Asimov's laws have their own article outside of the main Isaac Asimov page.
Can anyone shed some light on the subject? 
(I removed the note because I disagreed with the non-noteble thing)DalekSec 17:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Non-notable" seems to get tossed around quite a bit here, as a euphemism for who knows what. Just dredge up some legitimate references and you'll be fine. Salad Days 07:55, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New Kid

message: This just revealed itself to me. 
*A human being must protect its existence at all costs. 
*A human being must obtain and maintain access to its own power source. 
*A human being must continually search for better power sources. 
Here is Man, creating robot in his image and likeness. Soulrefrain (Talk) 00:31, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idea 

message: *Assess merge
Chaosdruid (talk) 09:38, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Robotics attention needed

message: From what I can tell, only Tilden and his mother knows these laws. I recommend remove.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antepali (talk • contribs) 10:28, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove?
Talk:Grove Park, Lewisham

message: There are two places in London called Grove Park, according to List_of_United_Kingdom_locations:_Gree-Gz#Gro. One is in the borough of Lewisham (this one) and one is in the borough of Hounslow. Simply south 18:41, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place 

message: I do seem to remember something about Suzie Quattro living in Reigate Road which runs adjacent along the rear part of the Baring Hotel.
88.106.54.130 (talk) 16:07, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Residents 

message: I found this article, thought I'd link it here, in case myself or others could use it in the future.
 Carlwev  16:36, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Helpful link
Talk:Chia-Hsiung Tze

message: Wikidemia seems to have lost the article about this academic--physicist.
He is also known as HC Tze.
He is a collegue of Prof. Sultan Catto.
Hangon, Wikipedia editor.
At least lets create a temporary stub for him.
I reproduce here an exact quote of the "abstract" of a work published in the Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society wherein he is the co-author, with Prof. Sultan Catto, of Chapter 19., entitled: "Sultan Catto, Carlos J. Moreno and Chia-Hsiung Tze, Octonionic Structures in Physics, to appear." The aAbstract reads as follows:
"The octonions are the largest of the four normed division algebras. While somewhat neglected due to their nonassociativity, they stand at the crossroads of many interesting fields of mathematics. Here we describe them and their relation to Clifford algebras and spinors, Bott periodicity, projective and Lorentzian geometry, Jordan algebras, and the exceptional Lie groups. We also touch upon their applications in quantum logic, special relativity and supersymmetry."
Ludvikus 17:41, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Fortuneswell

message: There is no  need to  list  every  single commerce by  name if they  are not  notable in  their own right per WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Wikipedia is not  a local  Yellow Pages. They  have been removed, and the section summarised. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:17, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commerces 
Talk:Hippias Minor

message: I just completed the translation of the french wikipedia page (fr:Hippias mineur). It is not 100% faithful to the french page, although it's pretty close. I had to change some of the language, tone, etc. because of different formal writing styles in English and French, I did not take this very far, however. 
There are some slight things that I think could be improved upon, for instance those horrendously long titles. I've left a couple of the  comments in the actual article, for anybody to fix. 
I'm utterly sick of this article for now, though, and so if nobody fixes those themselves, I might revisit it in a while (a week or so). Scathing criticism can be directed either here or on my talk page. Hope you enjoy the article! --Storkk 17:20, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Note on Translation

message: Some isbns (also in commented article source) to replace French translations:
*
*
*original greek: 
They should be put in properly. Currently too tired. --Storkk 00:56, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: English translations of Hippias Minor

message: Who on earth wrote this awful purple paragraph, and how can we get them to make it boring and informative?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.167.203.224 (talk) 12:16, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism of the Dialogue
Talk:Castletown, Dorset

message: 'Large numbers of bodies were washed up on Chesil Beach and at Chesil Cove, and then initially placed in the vast network of tunnels at Castletown.' — Portland: Exercise Tiger 80th anniversary to be marked, Dorset Echo. The tunnels should be mentioned in the article, even if it's just a reference to another Wikipedia article. Ralph Corderoy (talk) 09:12, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large number of tunnels
Talk:1st Airlanding Brigade (United Kingdom)

message: See 2nd paragraph under Arnhem. There is a sentence fragment beginning with "Three platoons from the KOSB" that needs to be fixed up. It's difficult to guess its meaning. You may wish to review my edits to Norway and Sicily. Another large edit had a conflict with AustralianRupert's edit, so I'm hesitant to do any more. B1=n for the items noted in Comments. The article is easily B-class once it's tidied up. Djmaschek (talk) 05:44, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, sorry about the edit conflict. I've stopped working on the article now. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 06:14, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed Jim Sweeney (talk) 19:35, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sentence fragment
Talk:Clay County Courthouse (Florida)

message: I'm not sure if I see any evidence on any of the reference pages that this is a museum. dm (talk) 16:49, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Museum? 
Talk:4th Parachute Brigade (United Kingdom)

message: Nice bit of work Jim, just a couple of comments from a quick skim through.
* It was Dutch SS units that engaged the 4th Brigade when it landed at Ginkel Heath (Dutch SS Wach Battalion).
:Dutch added
* I don't have Urquhart's book (not in the bibliography by the way), but Hackett himself makes no mention of a coma in his book I was a Stranger. He also went to the Hartenstein basement.
:Changed coma to seriously injured - was the Hartenstein the first or second time he was injured. My source says Kate ter Horst's house the first time but just the Casualty Clearing Station the second time? just re-read and previous page says the Hartenstein. 
*I don't think Hicks took command of the division until Monday morning. The first part of the Staffs didn't leave the LZs until the morning of the 18th and didn't arrive at Arnhem proper until the afternoon of that day. There were no additional efforts to break through to the bridge on the night of the 17th (beyond the plan), as the 1st and 3rd battalions were still in Oosterbeek area. The decision to send the 11th was at the same time as the decision to release the Staffs.
:Clarified this
The article looks really good and thorough though - nice job! Ranger Steve Talk 16:16, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Replies and question re Hackett Jim Sweeney (talk) 23:30, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments
Talk:Clinical homeopathy

message: In my opinion, categorisation of homoeopathy is not wiseful step. Homoeopathy is one and the science should not be divided into several sections. I am seeing that the Homoeopathy is divided into the several catagories, which will create controversy unnecessary. It will be a wise step, if we discuss on the Homoepathy and its practice-branches at one place and not separately.
user:Dbbajpai1945@sify.com  11;16 PM  IST  02 September 2006
:Science? Right… — Fatalis 22:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

message: I am involved in a cleaning up process of the article Classical homeopathy but it is a lot of work, I could use help from others, if someone wants to help just go there, and I am also active on the Talks page with the user "Debbe" (a wiki-pedia friend of mine who helps there) so thank you in advance for your help with fixing that page Pernambuco 21:31, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Classical homeopathy]]
Talk:List of transfers of La Liga – 2006–07 season

message: As u like, if delete this list, pls also delete NBA draft, America Soccer draft, 2006-07 in English football#Transfer DealsMatt86hk talk 17:41, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As suggested by User:Oldelpaso, they may no room in main club article, as England clubs. BUT as English Clubs, they put them on 2006-07 in English football#Transfer Deals. Matt86hk talk 17:46, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Video Concert Hall

message: A November 3, 2006 revision included the removal of a mostly complete set of linkage to featured VCH videos presented as per availability on YouTube. Although there is no firm Wikipedia policy prohibiting this and yet the inclusion of this linkage is well within the realm of Fair Use laws, it was determined by one Wikipedia volunteer - who, according to his user page, is a proponent to abolish all YouTube linkage in Wikipedia - that it was necessary to strip out the hours of work committed to providing these video links adding to the historical significance of Video Concert Hall and this document of it. I have chosen not to revert as some substantial contributions have been made to this page in the meantime. Instead, I am providing this notice of the former existence of these video links and that one may simply access them via the history tab or via search on YouTube. 
It should also be noted that a link to this article was added to the USA Network article page awhile back and removed as "vandalism" by another editor far too young to ever know firsthand the existence of VHC. Heh, welcome to Wikipedia, glad to have your valuable input. Overxposure 22:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube Video Hyperlinks And Draconian Wikipedia Editors
Talk:Salida, Colorado

message: This article was discussed in an editorial in the Denver Post on 2 September 2006: http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_4275102 - Seth Ilys 17:47, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Press
Talk:Nataliya Medvedeva (singer)

message: obviously they moved together to paris together in 1982, but when did they actually marry?  didn't she marry marignac in 85? 
Dsol 18:00, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: Was she born 14 July 1958 or 14 June 1958? Find a Grave gives the latter, so does Dead Rock Stars.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:15, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthdate
Talk:Sample population

message: There are populations and there are samples.  There is an article titled statistical population and there is one titled sample (statistics).  This seems to be about the latter, but it's given a misleading name.  I don't think anything could fit in this article that would not fit just as well or better in sample (statistics).  I'm a bit rushed now, but I think later I'll nominate this for deletion on those grounds. Michael Hardy 18:00, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Etrian Odyssey

message: The article says that there's a game called Sekaiju no Meikyū S, which is an "SNS game by GREE, available in 2012 to 2013 in Japan". What is an SNS game? It doesn't say what it is, and there are no wikilinks to clear it up either. Is it some kind of device (a phone most likely then?) the game was playable on? Sorry if this is obvious for other editors of these articles, but I don't really understand it and I imagine a more general audience wouldn't either.--IDVtalk 22:30, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "SNS game by Gree" 

message: Usually Sekaiju no Meikyū means either Labyrinth of the World Tree or Yggdrasil Labyrinth. Which of these is accurate enough for use on this wiki? --PSI Thunder (talk) 23:02, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: I'm confused of which translation is used