lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Graded poset

message: :Section added. —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 06:30, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite (PlanetMath)

message: HI! I have made your article "safe" for Polytopes, where our posets need dimension -1. This was already stated, I just tidied it up. By the way, Abstract Polytopes include some very "nasty" objects whose posets are not lattices. I have amended the article accordingly. Regards and Seasons Greetings SteveWoolf (talk) 05:45, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polytopes need rank -1! 

message: Is it true that the product of graded posets is also a graded poset? If so, I think it should be mentioned.Hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii (talk) 16:28, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Product 

message: Unfortunately, there is no uniform nomenclature for graded and ranked posets, but it should be handled uniformly within Wikipedia, though. According to the current definition, the section "The usual case" fits better into the article about ranked posets. It should either be moved there or the definitions of graded and ranked posets should be interchanged (as for example in http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0012365X9400284P). --Maformatiker (talk) 10:21, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graded/ranked poset 

message: See reference [2], p.722. ...
Where is the [2]?
:Butler, Lynne M. (1994), Subgroup Lattices and Symmetric Functions = pages 1-156
:Stanley, Richard (1997). Enumerative Combinatorics = last page = 324
:Anderson, Ian (1987). Combinatorics of Finite Sets = last page = 250
:Engel, Konrad (1997). Sperner Theory = last page = 417
:Kung, Joseph P. S.; Rota, Gian-Carlo; Yan, Catherine H. (2009). Combinatorics: The Rota Way = last page = 396 
:Birkhoff: Lattice Theory = last page = 417
How and where I can find Brightwell's and West's definition?
Jumpow (talk) 20:20, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange reference "See reference [2], p.722."
Talk:Cliff Wilson

message: I've removed "although he played in the World Championship at the Crucible Theatre on eight occasions, he never progressed beyond the first round – a record he shares with Rex Williams." from the article as I couldn't find a reliable source. If you can, please restore it to the article. Thanks, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 15:43, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Crucible Record
Talk:Cliffie Stone

message: According to this article, Cliffie Stone was born in Stockton, California and died in Saugus, California. However, Allmusic notes that Cliffie Stone was born in Burbank, California and died in Sandra Clarita, California, while IMDb notes that he was born in Stockton, California and died in Newhall, California, and accordind to , he was born in Burbank, California. Isn't there a mistake somewhere ? ^v^ FreeBird ^v^ (talk) 06:06, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Another thing : On Cliffie Stone's Biography, it is written that he was born Clifford Gilpin Snyder Stockton, California but also that he passed away on January 16, 1998. However, the article on WP:EN notes that he died on January 17, 1998. This point should probably be verified too. ^v^ FreeBird ^v^ (talk) 09:33, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  It looks like Cliffie Stone eventually died on January 16, 1998 and was burried in Newhall, California as it can be seen on this page : . I'm going to rectify his date of death but won't rectify his place of birth since he could have been burried in Newhall, California but could have died somewhere else. ^v^ FreeBird ^v^ (talk) 09:40, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Places and dates of birth and death
Talk:Clifford Warren Ashley

message: Ashley was also an artist. I have seen at least one of his oil paintings in the collection of the Delaware Art Museum.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by AJim (talk • contribs) 07:41, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Clifford Milburn Holland

message: Expansion is required, particularly to discuss the subject's work. Sourcing further references is a priority. Espresso Addict 20:12, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Brief comments

message: There has been discussion of this topic at the tunnel page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.244.128.248 (talk) 13:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of Holland's death
Talk:Hedgehog space

message: This article makes it seem like the $K$-Hedgehog space is the quotient space resulting from talking $K$ disjoint copies of $[0,1]$ and gluing them at $0$. For infinite $K$ however one such space in not first countable, and in particular not metrizable. I think this should be made clear. Maybe something like "take $K$ disjoing copies of $(0,1]$ and then a point $0^*$ and consider the following metric...". Or making it explicit that the hedgehog topology is strictly coarser that the quotient one given by gluing all the origins, and noting that the later one is not first countable.    — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.3.7.186 (talk) 10:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: I deleted the statement about the Hedgehog space being a Moore space (true but unhelpful, 
because a Moore space is a generalization of a metric space, and the hedgehog space is a metric 
space) and the statement that the Hedgehog space satisfies "strong compactness properties" -- 
it is easy to see that it is not compact if the spininess is infinite.
I also added a reference to a one-page proof of Kowalsky's theorem. Plclark (talk) 06:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brief edits 

message: Hi. See also wikibooks article . --Adam majewski (talk) 20:32, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  cremer
Talk:Clinton B. Ford

message: Anyone know what the "B" stands for?  --Schmendrick (talk) 20:13, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Banker. Praemonitus (talk) 17:01, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Middle Initial?
Talk:Hurwitz matrix

message: Confusion on the definition ? 
The definition on this page is not the most common one. 
Most people in the literature call Hurwitz matrix a matrix whose eigenvalues have strictly negative real part (called stable Hurwitz matrix in this article).
: Support In stability analysis and control theory Hurwitz matrix is indeed a matrix whose eigenvalues have strictly negative real part. Definition from the PlanetMath.--Krystofer (talk) 15:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Support Agreed, I was confused when I came to the article. I think the engineering Hurwitz matrix should be the main definition, with the other following, and both definitions should appear at the start of the article where the term is defined. Glyph27notfound (talk) 05:38, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Clinton Haines

message: An editor with a conflict of interest recently removed five reliable sources I found for this article. Their reasons for doing this were on the grounds it made the article "less interesting" and the editor "disagreed" with the referenced opinions of an expert commenting on the subject. See here. Obviously I don't need to tell any experienced editors how many policies this violates, I just want an official record of these actions made in case further attempts are made to vandalise this article by turning it into a memorial where any criticism of the subject is not allowed. Revised Freikorp (talk) 09:02, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of interest

message: Theres a few dead links in the references that need to be either replaced or updated with archive.org links. I'd do it, however archive.org appears to be down for me right now, alas. So if some champ wants to get in there and try and solve this, it would be greatly appreciated. Duckmonster (talk) 00:44, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Damien Linnane (talk) 02:15, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Expired links
Talk:Autonomous prefecture

message: Please add Aspirant Autonomous prefectures of the People's Republic of China--Kaiyr (talk) 11:42, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  I mean like this: Aspirant states of india. Maybe some politics suggest to unite several Autonomous counties to one Autonomous prefecture.--Kaiyr (talk) 21:21, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aspirant Autonomous prefectures of the People's Republic of China
Talk:Hypoelliptic operator

message: There's not one sentence here that I understand. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 18:45, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unintelligible 

message: I think that heat operator is parabolic and not hypoelliptic operator. Could someone verify it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.153.189.247 (talk) 12:47, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maybe an error
Talk:Indeterminate (variable)

message: Perhaps it is worth to mention, why we use in general x as unknown.
http://www.ted.com/talks/terry_moore_why_is_x_the_unknown.html
--77.186.34.177 (talk) 21:12, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: why is x the unknown

message: The following defines an indeterminate in terms of other undefined concepts: symbol, variable, placeholder, and in terms of what it is not.  Can we do any better?
In mathematics, and particularly in formal algebra, an indeterminate is a symbol that is treated as a variable, but does not stand for anything else but itself and is used as a placeholder in objects such as polynomials and formal power series. In particular, it does not designate a constant or a parameter of the problem, it is not an unknown that could be solved for, and it is not a variable designating a function argument or being summed or integrated over; it is not any type of bound variable.--345Kai (talk) 22:07, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  definition is unclear
Talk:Code of Massachusetts Regulations

message: The reference link leading to the CMR FAQ is dead. It is available on the Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20171108133946/http://www.mass.gov/courts/case-legal-res/law-lib/laws-by-source/cmr/cmrfaq.html
I don't know (offhand) how to repair the link while preserving the original URL. -- Jmudge (talk) 18:50, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead reference link
Talk:Cluny Macpherson (physician)

message: NOTE: Cluny signed his letters “Macpherson”, with a lower case "p". http://www.rnr.therooms.ca/soldier_files/MacPherson_Cluny_rnr-1192.pdf Klossoke (talk) 13:10, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Article title corrected April 21, 2018 Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Surname
Talk:Irreducible component

message: What is this part of the article saying. I neither believe the statement nor understand the example.
:Every open set is dense in an irreducible space, which is clearly false for the real numbers. Thus R is reducible. Father Chaos (talk) 23:13, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real Numbers Reducible 

message: It is essential to refer local irreducibility. Coffeebrake60 (talk) 11:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This is true that R is reducible for the usual topology and this definition of irreducibility: it is the union of two closed subsets, for example the nonnegative numbers and the non-positive numbers. Maybe you have another definition in mind, or you are confusing irreduciblr and connex. Therefore I'll revert your edit. Nevertheless this article, although correct, is very badly written. The main point is that it emphasizes the topological definition, when the notion originates in algebraic geometry, and from the topological point of view, it makes sense only for Zariski topology. D.Lazard (talk) 12:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: February 2014
Talk:List of theories

message: Contrary to the statement at the beginning of the article there seem to be two viewpoints:
# This is indeed largely a list of theories but not branches of knowledge with "theory" in their name.
# String theory and relativity theory are branches of knowledge with "theory" in their name.  Essentially all of the mathematics/physics topics ("theories") listed are on the same footing as these.
Furthermore, just adding a section == List of theories == and a link back to this article on each article for one of these "theories" just to make the present article have lots of links to it is ridiculous, and these links should be removed. -- Chuck 20:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

message: I believe it would be useful to have subsections which group the theories into their subject areas, thus eliminating the need to differentiate between theories of science and other theories. User:Oliverbeatson 149.254.219.163 (talk) 11:15, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Subsections
Talk:Kautz graph

message: The figure on the right (M=2, N=2) does not appear to be a correct Kautz graph.  It seems to be missing 3 edges: CAB->ABA, BCA->CAC, ABC->BCB.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.174.253.236 (talk) 19:06, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Length function

message: The axioms for the length function correspond to that of a norm for a vector space. Indeed, for a vector space viewed as an Abelian group (with group operation being vector addition), every norm on this vector space corresponds to a length function. The connection to the concept of a metric is made in just the same way that it is made with a norm.  Note also that the symmetry requirement of a metric would likely mean that the group on which the length function is defined is Abelian. Undsoweiter (talk) 04:26, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar to a norm, not a metric
Talk:Magnum Pose

message: This page should not be deleted because it is a meaningful look from the movie Zoolander. Without that look, the movie would not be complete. --Higgins555 20:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The movie is obviously itself notable, a pose from the movie is not. Wildthing61476 20:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

text: I disagree because there is alot of talk about the pose in the movie, so interested users should be allowed to know what it is.--Higgins555 20:06, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If this pose is so widely discussed, then read the guidelines for notability under WP:NOTE, and please cite independent, verifiable, secondary sources (WP:CITE) where the pose is discussed (message board posts and blog entries very, very rarely satisfy those requirements, try for published magazine and newspaper articles, or notable websites that include significant content on this "pose".  If you can do that, then this pose is worthy of a wikipedia article, otherwise it's suitable for deletion.  --Wingsandsword 20:14, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, screw it i don't even care. Delete it all you want.--Higgins555 20:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Limit point compact

message: Isn't this property of topological spaces also called Bolzano-Weierstrass property? ,  --Kompik (talk) 13:01, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Bolzano-Weierstrass property

message: It would be interesting to point out the difference between this and sequential completeness (IMHO this should be the main purpose and could even be the only purpose of this article, given that seq.completeness is well known & documented), instead of repeating several times that they are different but equivalent in metric spaces, without giving any hint on the difference. — MFH:Talk 09:50, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  difference between limit point and sequential completeness
Talk:Fungiculture

message: It would be nice to have a comprehensive list of commonly "cultivated" mushrooms here. MD (talk) 20:26, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs list of commonly cultivated mushrooms

message: The "Production regions in the United States" section skews the arcticle a bit, I guess a global perspective is needed. Maybe something like a "Production regions in different countries" section, with sub-sections for notable countries. MMad (talk) 22:49, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I'll go ahead and add the Template:Globalize/USA tag to the article. There are several sections that, while informative and well written, clearly have a US slant. MMad (talk) 23:12, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Worldwide perspective

message: One thing that is missing from this article is the history of fungiculture. Until fairly recently, only a few species could be cultivated, and cultivation was probably more advanced in East Asia than elsewhere. Over the past fifty years, quite a few new species have been under cultivation. It seems to me that a discussion of these developments is desirable.Bill (talk) 19:41, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing History

message: This page doesn't seem to be supervised by anyone. Posters above have made pertinent statements involving improvements that could be made to the page. Who addresses these suggestions? I'm wondering because I have a few suggestions. Lemme start with the section on log cultivation. A newly developing technique for outdoor log cultivation is to use shorter sections of log--12 inches or so-- which are then place in nursery pots filled 3/4 to the top with sand. These pots are ten placed outdoor in uncontrolled environment. Moisture is contained with the log and transferred to the log via the mechanism of the sand which holds a certain amount of water each time it rains. I know that both reishi and shitake are cultivated this way.Mccue3g (talk) 22:12, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  There doesn't seem to be anyone paying attention to this page/edit suggestion 

message: Mushrooms are not grown on hay. They are grown on straw. Hay is a poor substrate. Minor edit, but thought I should make note.Mccue3g (talk) 15:04, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  made minor edit 

message: PA citation is a dead link.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.111.148.64 (talk) 22:54, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  PA 
Talk:Colin Gubbins

message: There is no such rank as '1st Lieutenant' in the British Army.  There is '2nd Lieutenant' which is followed by 'Lieutenant'. This rank only exists in the Royal Navy and foreign armies e.g. American.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.148.108.104 (talk) 11:55, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

message: What was the nature of the missions to Poland in 1938 and early 1939? --41.150.103.130 (talk) 12:13, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mission to Poland 

message: What baloney! Read Lynne Olson's Last Hope Island and you will see that Gubbins screwed up by not listening to his chief code expert, Leo Marks. More than 50 SOE agents were captured and later killed as a result of Gubbins's failure to heed the warnings of Marks. Iss246 (talk) 22:08, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Andrew Roberts and Niall Ferguson call Gubbins "one of the war's unsung heroes".

message: The lead of this article describes Gubbins as the 'prime mover' of SOE; I can't help but think that this isn't a very encyclopaedic way of describing his role. I can't ascertain if this description was officially used because the link attached to the citation is broken. Could/should the wording be changed? Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 23:00, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead
Talk:Locally integrable function

message: I don't know much about this subject, which is what led me to this page. But the article gives a weaker definition than is apparently available, saying the more abstract setting is not used very often. Here is at least one reader who needed it! Maybe somebody who knows more about this subject than I do can improve the article. Preceding unsigned comment by 216.165.151.43
In this vein, here are some useful references:
*Schilling & Kuhn (2021) and Driver (2012) define \mathcal L^1_\mathrm{loc}(\mu) given an arbitrary topological space (X,\mathcal T) and an arbitrary measure \mu on the Borel \sigma-algebra \sigma(\mathcal T) 
*Edwards & Gaudry (1977) and Filter & Weber (1997) define \mathcal L^1_\mathrm{loc}(\mu) given an arbitrary measure space (X,\mathcal A,\mu): a function f:X\to\bar\mathbb R is in \mathcal L^1_\mathrm{loc}(\mu) iff for every A\in\mu^\mathrm{pre}\mathbb R, (i.e., A is measurable and has finite measure), fe_A^X\in L^1(\mu_A), where \mu_A is the subspace measure induced on A. [ Jacobs (1978) gives the definition for an arbitrary "measure"/"\sigma-content" on an arbitrary "local \sigma-ring" (a.k.a. \delta-ring).] [Filter & Weber give a version for an arbitrary ring of sets \mathcal A. At first glance, Filter & Weber may appear to say that any locally integrable function will be integrable; taking A=X in their definition yields f\in L^1(\mu). However, their definition corresponds to our \sigma-algebra definition only when we consider the ring \mu^\mathrm{pre}\mathbb R of finite-measure measurable sets. In this case, it is obvious that their definition coincides with ours.]
Thatsme314 (talk) 10:16, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Euclidean space 

message: In what sense is the final example a solution to the given differential equation on all of  \mathbb R ? I get that the restriction of this function to  {\mathbb R} - \{0\}  does not extend to a distribution on  \mathbb R , but it's unclear how the function given (with f(0) = 0) can be interpreted as some kind of weak solution of the given equation across zero, since it's not integrable. Spireguy (talk) 15:05, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples
Talk:Maclaurin's inequality

message: I propose this article be renamed to "Maclaurin's inequality" (i.e. with a lower case 'l'), for consistency with Colin Maclaurin, Maclaurin series, Sectrix of Maclaurin, Trisectrix of Maclaurin and dozens (hundreds?) or Google hits. DH85868993 (talk) 13:53, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Michael Hardy (talk) 19:29, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed rename
Talk:Collett E. Woolman

message: Woolman was known as "Wolly" to his employees, according to my late Georgia Tech roommate, who sat on his lap as a toddler while he played poker with the mechanics in the hangar, including his father, who was a mechanic, waiting for all the DC3's to return. I'm not sure of their policy now; but at least up until the late 1980's, every Delta airplane passed through their Atlanta maintenance hangars once every 24 hours.
Discpad (talk) 06:54, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Collin Walcott

message: Changin "American" by "North American". It's so stupid call "American" only to USA people. A lot of people of other countries are American too.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.69.226.5 (talk) 17:19, August 21, 2007 (UTC) 
Mexico and Canada are part of North America also, North American doesn't work either.  So maybe it should simply be United States of America.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.73.216.102 (talk) 16:43, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "...was killed in an automobile accident in East Germany during a 1984 Oregon concert tour."
Really? If he was on a concert tour of Oregon, how could he have been killed in East Germany -during- the tour?  Last I looked, there were several thousand miles and an ocean between the two places.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.92.174.105 (talk) 02:01, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have edited the Walcott entry to include that Walcott was among those Paul Winter group members to form the band Oregon. So indeed Walcott was killed during the band Oregon's 1984 tour of East Germany; although I have read elsewhere that it was the tour bus and not an automobile crash that killed Walcott and the group's East German tour promoter. BubbleDine (talk) 04:39, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oregon / East Germany ??
Talk:Montel's theorem

message: In the current version of the article the first criterion would tell that the family f_n(z)=n is not normal, whereas the second would tell it is. (Say, the domain is the unit disk. But it does not matter). If different notions of being normal are used, this should be specified. Arnaud Chéritat (talk) 20:10, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  On different opinions on whether f_n(z) = n is normal