lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:TEMPUS

message: The three sentences "Tambov State Technical University's Centre for International Specialist Training (CIST) runs a specialist training course, "English for Students, Lecturers and Administrators of Technical Universities", developed within the framework of TEMPUS.[3] According to 2013 figures of the Minister of Education between 1993 and 2013 40% of Ukrainian higher education establishments have participated in TEMPUS projects.[1] In 2008, TEMPUS opened offices in both Jerusalem and Ramallah.[2]" are somewhat thrown together. 
I'd prefer a more coherent synthesis, e.g. as a translation of the concize and very new Esperanto-article: "The program is arranged in intervals of seven years, whose experiences are reviewed before making adjustments to the program for the next interval. At the moment, the fourth program interval of 2007 to 2013 is taking place, and it's foreseen to have a following fifth interval of 2014 to 2020. In addition to offices in the EU Member States, the program according to the state of autumn 2013 has national offices in Albania, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Georgia , Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Libya, Macedonia, Morocco, Moldova , Montenegro, Morocco, Palestine, Russian Federation, Serbia, Syria, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Ukraine and Uzbekistan." 
The information about Tambov, Ukraine, Jerusalem and Ramallah could be used in a more coherent text, or just the sentence about the example of Ukraine could be cited as a single sentence after the initial text. Not being a native of English, I wouldn't put the rough translation out of Esperanto into the English text myself, but would ask for rewiev. --ThomasPusch (talk) 22:16, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Marlon Brando filmography

message: Why is there a sub-article? Was this discussed before the move? FWIW Bzuk 12:28, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sub-article

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20151102152541/https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000008/bio. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  DanCherek (talk) 16:44, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Coombe Abbey

message: Should "Coombe Abbey" be on the same page as "Coombe Country Park"? Snowman 12:33, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there any reason for the de-merger as the articles are short and really go together. Keith D (talk) 16:30, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Page organisation

message: I know that this might seem very twee, but unless you don't pronounce the 'h' in historic, you shouldn't use an as the article, it should be 'a historic'. I'm pointing this out as I don't know how to edit the page.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.40.170.231 (talk • contribs) 10:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The rule is usually that you use "a" before a consonant and "an" before a vowel. However, the h in "historic" is not really acting like a consonant. It forms a sort of dipthong with the i. For that reason, it sounds better to say "an historic," even if you pronounce the h more than British pronunciation 217.41.45.25 (talk) 11:15, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  An historic? Grammar / spelling point 

message: Following moved from article. Keith D (talk) 17:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request
Wikipedia talk:Deletion review/Log/2007 September 25

message: I am the closing admin. I will be interested in the commentary that ensues here.  Irrelevant to the outcome of this review but relevant in regard to my standing as an admin, which any deletion review can be used to call into question, I point out that this closure was conducted during a period when I altered my closure style by taking a broader view on articles rather than treating the debate as a closed circuit; I have since reverted to a less interpretive stance.  I will further point out that the first course that I would have appreciated being taken was for the Deletion Review nominator to contact me on my talk page (not done) to point out where they believed I was in error. That course assumes good faith.  Rather, the Deletion Review nominator informed me of this action without further commentary. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 12:16, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment on [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John McGrady]]
Talk:Cahya Mata Sarawak

message: This page was recreated from Cahya Mata Sarawak.
The fact is that Cahya Mata Sarawak Berhad is the actual name of the company.
So if anybody out there knows how to remove the Cahya Mata Sarawak page pls do so.
CoolCityCat 12:42, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do not move articles by copying and pasting them because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page.  If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen.  Thank you.  — madman bum and angel 14:49, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.cmsb.com.my/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=46&Itemid=54. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 12:06, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: See also Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Aiman abmajid. MER-C 12:06, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Samudrika Shastra

message: This article is about to head into an edit war. I'm opening this discussion first to stop that from happening. Another editor has raised concerns that this is not part of the vedic tradition. I have reverted these edits because they aren't backed by reliable sources (the cited source is self-published so it's not reliable) but I'm willing to consider changing the content if reliable sources can be found. Please let me know your thoughts. Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) (talk) 21:18, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vedic tradition
Talk:Wells (Priory Road) railway station

message: I have renamed this page to "Wells (Priory Road) railway station" (adding spaces around the brackets, ala Wiki style guides.  For example: "Cole (for Bruton) railway station").  All links to the old page have been migrated, and I have linked the diagrams from Somerset and Dorset Joint Railway and East Somerset Railway to this page. David Bailey 14:14, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Brandon T. Jackson

message: I added a NPOV tag to this age due to some text that isn't exactly neutral.
He claims to have been "discovered"
Putting quotes around a word, and using words like "claim"
He hosted only one episode of the Brandon T. Jackson Show on The N channel.
It should state he hosed one episode, having "only" in there implies that it is in comparison to something else.
98.127.168.159 (talk) 06:17, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 
Talk:Welshpool Road

message: Is it worth mentioning when Welshpool Rd was deviated in the 1970's and the old section going 'up the hill' was then renamed Crystal Brook Road?petedavo  —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 14:51, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 09:10, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style
Talk:2007 General Motors strike

message: Dear Wikipedians,
I've just recently updated the article to make it more comprehensive in terms of its coverage. I added sections describing the Background, Motivations, Strike, Resolution, and Impact. I took into account what was previously on the article and tried to integrate that with the new information that was added. Please review the article and let me know if there are any areas that may need to be changed. 
Stormfire77 (talk) 06:33, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating the Article 
Talk:Taubman Museum of Art

message: The statement "The collection includes works by Thomas Eakins, Winslow Homer and Childe Hassam." is ,of course, true, but maybe misleading because Homer is no longer displayed.  Does this need to be clarified?
Pommerenke (talk) 15:46, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collection and Exhibits
Talk:Titan (cave)

message: Moose appears without context. 2.26.209.19 (talk) 12:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The first mention was removed ages ago. I've put it back in. Dave.Dunford (talk) 19:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Moose?
Talk:Daniel Capecci

message: Dan Capecci and Daniel Capecci appear to be the same person and need to be merged. Studerby 14:21, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Charles Gibbs

message: A copy of The Pirates Own Book is online here: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/12216/12216-h/12216-h.htm
May be of help. Neil ム 14:26, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I visited the museum and can confirm that the skull of Gibbs is, in fact, on display.  Is a photo of the skull enough proof to remove the "citation needed" clause?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.2.176.4 (talk) 12:56, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Gibbs
Talk:Corneal epithelium

message: Needs histology presented in less antiquated language.  Hovea 14:26, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Category talk:Start-Class LGBT articles

message: The bibliography had viable sources; there was only 3 in there and 4 in the main article. More the reliable sources would strengthen the article.
In the articles the sections are scarce on information, every section could use more information to help fill out article.
There are content gaps in the " 21st century" and the "1950s: Organizations Begin" section. Chmw8 (talk) 04:32, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review
Talk:Howard Krongard

message: What is the relationship if any between former CIA executive director Buzzy (A.B.) Krongard and Howard Krongard?   Jmegill 14:39, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi all. Just wondering if the controversy over Krongard and the corrupt contractors, etc. should be here, or on a separate article. (Given WP:BLP concerns). In my view, it seems fine to have it here now, given that there's a small amount of material that's relatively neutral. But I can imagine that if an investigation goes forward, there might be a need to create a new article and present a summary here. Thoughts? --Bfigura (talk) 21:13, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  State IG Issue 

message: "Most of the allegations have been denounced – by the minority members of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and by some numbskulls at the Wall Street Journal – as pure partisan politics.[13][14]"
"Some numbskulls" is unencyclopedic language to say the least! But the original comment wasn't very helpful without more detail - just saying that some people (unnamed, but who turn out to be Krongard's political allies) denounced "most" allegations, without specifying who, which allegations, and on what grounds, is pretty irrelevant. If it can't be expanded, it should be removed - but obviously it shouldn't have been vandalized with the "numbskulls" comment either.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.184.81 (talk) 15:28, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Two malicious editors have been at war
Talk:Bazaar of the Bizarre

message: Some IP address keeps reverting this article to a previous version that's full of passive voice and poor wording, and in the last edit, claimed that he was correcting multiple typos and grammatical errors. I see no typos or grammatical errors in this version, but if I'm mistaken, here's the place to discuss those errors. Rray (talk) 22:14, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typos and grammatical errors
Talk:Project Hostile Intent

message: I'm rubbish at writing proper encyclopedia articles, but here's the official Homeland Security page about the project: http://www.homelandsecurity.org/snapshots/newsletter/2007-05.htm#deception
:Sorry, but that's a civilian operated page. The offical DHS website (like all other government websites) has a ".gov" at the end. In any case, the info itself is basically good, just abbreviated. Sweetfreek (talk) 23:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *Potentially Malicious Domain: (EXPLOIT, RBN Known Malvertiser IP 22)
*hxxp://www.dailygalaxy.com/
*https://www.virustotal.com/de/url/06f7d7c43c549e5e370a1e64d961bbbb9f4be55c29111d41e93ae9bb66489f23/analysis/1374427632/
*JS/Exploit-Blacole.cw
*https://www.virustotal.com/de/file/5ea1609b649e14ccfd84fec0d7e9d13cb0f885876f0ef5fae0407d23490ecddc/analysis/1374428349/
*https://www.virustotal.com/de/file/192346fedd2cc52353f89fd93fe1da383b6fa8a969c4c27f1fa663d4a40c3ae4/analysis/1374428351/
*https://www.virustotal.com/de/file/2656324fdda8179413cf416bd559e5f6f13864886a6d31907928e6334e64ebfa/analysis/1374428355/
*https://www.virustotal.com/de/file/a9dc933ca440b54c82be1fc9a71df252cf738ca3d908814adc656d9ffcc7c6ed/analysis/1374428365/
*https://www.virustotal.com/de/file/42430671c0fd1332eeb990373a1707da334520e2bae48d1dc9ee6df47b728125/analysis/1374428367/
*https://www.virustotal.com/de/file/8eb65132b441b07193c467814570e2c0959ceff07e35149247f531dde514782f/analysis/1374428377/
*REFERENCE: http://jsunpack.jeek.org/?report=49695ac9748fc84c3953dd8db54a661f52fd8be4
*http://urlquery.net/report.php?id=3902995
*SEE ALSO:
*http://quttera.com/detailed_report/www.dailygalaxy.com
*http://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.dailygalaxy.com
*http://www.UnmaskParasites.com/security-report/?page=www.dailygalaxy.com
--Gary Dee 18:13, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malware Link Removal 

message: Why don’t we have criticism section on this crazy stuff? Minority Report, 1984 thoughtcrime. Amazing that people tolerate this insanity. 2A04:4A43:40EF:F495:CC7A:DD1C:9FA4:B942 (talk) 10:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism section
Talk:Drums of Tombalku

message: I've removed the link to Wikisource as the story is not available there. Brent Krajewski (talk) 20:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikisource
Talk:Rookie list

message: I question the value of this section. It is long, the players are of differing quality and note, and it is only likely to increase in length as more fans add their favourite players. Perhaps we remove this section until a rookie wins the Brownlow. Aspirex 14:42, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable Former Rookies

message: The articles about the AFL darft and the Rookie List only mention eligibility in terms of age. Where do the players come from? Do they come from district competitions? state competitions? Do they have to be in senior competitions, or could a really good U18 be selected in the pre-season draft. And how does a player get to be on a 'draft list?'. Do players have to nominate themselves for an actual list, or is anybody who plays in a more junior competition automatically eligible to be drafted? I've tried reading the articles to understand how it works but I don't think the articles explain the eligibility aspect of it very well. Could somebody please help out and fill in the gaps.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.110.156 (talk) 15:51, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eligibility?
Talk:Solomons Island, Maryland

message: Material from this article (Solomons Island) has been merged with (Solomons, Maryland). This page will become a redirect since the town is more often called (Solomons Island) by tourists than by its official name (Solomons, Maryland).Wikited (talk) 14:44, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks, article merged by creator of the article
Talk:Mitochondrial shuttle

message: what are the advantages and disadvantages of each of these shuttle systems? Mkayatta (talk) 19:53, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Title and content not relevant.
As far as I can see, the shuttle system described under the title "glycerol phosphate shuttle" is actually of "malate-aspartate shuttle". All those metabolites mentioned and the transamination pertain not to G3P but to malate-aspartate shuttle. It would be nice to move the present content there to the above mentioned malate-aspartate shuttle, and to add a relevant short description for G3P shuttle. William Savalto (talk) 19:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, this is incorrect and misleading. Unfortunately I don't have the knowledge to fix it appropriately. בצאת ישראל (talk) 21:49, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glycerol phosphate shuttle
Talk:Science Museum of Virginia

message: I think it would be good to expand on the information about The Dome.  Currently, it just says "In 2014 the museum upgraded its five-story theater, The Dome, with a new digital projection system".  I think it could add information about the specs. For example,
It is no longer an IMAX system. It is an Evans & Sutherland (E&S) Digistar 5 system.  It is an all digital system that combines five Christie 4K LED projectors to provide 8K resolution at 120Hz with active stereo 3D capabilities.  
Source:
https://www.inparkmagazine.com/science-museum-of-virginia-team-discusses-how-their-new-8k-system-changed-the-way-they-use-the-dome/   Megarect (talk) 14:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand info on "new digital projection system."
Talk:Sir Harold and the Gnome King

message: Reading about the Harold Shea series, I was struck by a connection that I have not seen remarked on anywhere [emphasis added]:
#The original series: ... L. Ron Hubbard's misuse of their hero in his novella The Case of the Friendly Corpse (1941). (De Camp would finally address the latter issue in "Sir Harold and the Gnome King".)
#The second series: The impulse for the continuation [i.e., creating a second series] appears to have been de Camp's desire to tie up the main loose end from the original series, in which Walter Bayard had been left stranded in the world of Irish myth, and to resolve the unaddressed complication introduced by Hubbard. Both of these goals were accomplished in "Sir Harold and the Gnome King" (1990).
#Sir Harold and the Gnome King (introduction): [One of the issues that de Camp addressed in the story] was a long-standing plot complication introduced by L. Ron Hubbard's "borrowing" of Shea for use in his novella The Case of the Friendly Corpse (1941), previously ignored by de Camp and Pratt. 
#Sir Harold and the Gnome King (Plot summary): The Oz he [Shea] encounters is greatly changed from the land of which Baum had written, the enchantment that had kept its inhabitants ageless having been broken through a misuse of magic by a dabbler in spells named Dranol Drabbo some years prior. 
It seems to me obvious that the character of Dranol Drabbo is intended as a Tuckerization of L. Ron Hubbard. (Although I read the story, it was years ago, and all of my information is based on the Wikipedia articles cited.) My reasons:
The names are similar: "Dranol" is an anagram of "Ronald", Hubbard's middle name, and "Drabbo" spelled backwards is "Obbard", very close to "Hubbard" (but maybe -- this is a guess -- different enough to avoid a libel suit).
The actions are parallel: 
*In the real world, Hubbard used the Shea character improperly. In "Sir Harold and the Gnome King", Dranol Drabbo used magic improperly.
*Hubbard's story created complications in the Harold Shea universe. Drabbo's dabbling destroyed the immortality spell in the Oz universe.
However, the names are different enough so that this inference counts as original research for Wikipurposes ;-), so I am only putting this as a speculation (back) here on the talk page.
--Thnidu (talk) 21:29, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe you!  The name correspondence, now you mention it, is inescapable.  Opinion:  Hubbard deserves it and deCamp may have thought so, too.  Zaslav (talk) 01:21, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Much of this article looks like original research, somewhat in the plot summary and very much in the section "Differences from earlier Harold Shea stories".  It's interesting but it needs citations.  Zaslav (talk) 01:24, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research