Talk:Avatar (spacecraft)

message: :Image:Avatar rlv concept.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for [[Image:Avatar rlv concept.jpg]]

message: The Avatar(rocket) need to be renamed as Avatar Reusable Launch Vehicle.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 05:30, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a source?  If so, add it to the article as, on Wikipedia, WP:Anyone can edit.  N2e (talk) 17:38, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming 

message: Link to Concept of AVATAR broken due to geocities being shut down.
However a copy of the page resides in the Web Archive at this address:
http://web.archive.org/web/20071013165131/http://www.geocities.com/spacetransport/spacecraft-avatar.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.134.36.65 (talk) 11:02, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Links

message: 
:Since the article has a photo now, and it's a Creative Commons image, I have disabled the  tag. If there are additional/better images needed, feel free to undo my actions. Avicennasis @ 05:22, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Image tag

message: THe article says that Currently DRDO plans to build and fly a scaled-down version of AVATAR, weighing just 3 tonnes at takeoff. The project is headed by Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre in Thiruvananthapuram. The mini AVATAR is to be built by a Hyderabad-based private company called CIM Technologies by 2010.. Did this happen? Has it been delayed? - The Bushranger One ping only 16:41, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, indeed.  There are no sources supporting anything other than that the AVATAR was a lightly-funded concept development effort in the early 2000s.  I have updated the lede, and requested sources to support many of the claims.  N2e (talk) 17:35, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Update needed

message: "AVATAR (from "Aerobic Vehicle for Transatmospheric Hypersonic Aerospace TrAnspoRtation")". It sounds like somebody really wants the acronym to be "avatar". Is this official? I only ask because the source for this was a blog. -  theWOLFchild 16:52, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, an Indian deity's name for an Indian spacecraft. BatteryIncluded (talk) 17:17, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  - From what I understand, their belief is that deities appear in the form of various avatars. It's not that one of their deities is actually named "Avatar". If they wanted to name a ship after a deity, they could've named it "Vishnu" or "Shiva", or any other of the List of Hindu deities (or find a bunch of words to create the acronym spelling out those names). Anyway, my point isn't so much about the name, but the silly length they went to just to have the acronynm spell "AVATAR" (like selecting 3 letters at random points from a single word; "TrAnspoRtation"). -  theWOLFchild 00:21, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really...? 

message: A query in Indian Parliament clears it up for good."Feasibility study of project"AVATAR)" has been done by a group of scientists in DRDO. ISRO has no connection with the project." So I think this is enough to put this bundle of speculation to rest. Any  mention of ISRO being associated with this concept needs to rectified and any speculative association of this space-plane concept with ISRO's RLV-TD and future TSTO-RLV should be corrected as well.
I suspect that the question in Indian Parliament in itself was result of this wiki article leave alone dozens of 'journalists' who based their articles on this!
On a side note I think this confusion arises from the fact that ISRO's RLV Project preliminary studies/projections, Unveiling of AVATAR concept and some budget allocation towards study of air-breathing launch vehicle concept(in 2005) all were done in early or mid 2000's that could've lead to some misassociations.
Ohsin (talk) 05:28, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for that document. So, the DRDO (Defence Research and Development Organization) is behind AVATAR. Who is doing the scaled prototype called 'Reusable Launch Vehicle-Technology Demonstrator' (RLV-TD)? ISRO? Are they completely unrelated?  Thanks, BatteryIncluded (talk) 14:59, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I am deleting all mentions of RLV and will move those to the ISRO's RLV article when finished. BatteryIncluded (talk) 15:26, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  RLV-TD is ISRO project. And they say it is "is a series of technology demonstration missions that have been considered as a first step towards realizing a Two Stage To Orbit (TSTO) fully re-usable vehicle". RLV-TD appears to be unrelated to AVATAR and I could find nothing that was official or reliable and associated AVATAR to ISRO. Also both agencies have their own prototypes. DRDO has Hypersonic Technology Demonstrator Vehicle or HSTDV and their presentations/posters show renderings of various space-plane concepts including AVATAR but I am not certain if it something in active development. Also noteworthy is ISRO being a civilian agency maintains a distance from DRDO. The man behind AVATAR Hyperplane in fact said "ISRO has taken up a programme to develop a RLV (reusable launch vehicle) Technology Demonstrator somewhat on the lines of Japan's Hope concept." HOPE-X was a series of experiments similar to RLV-TD done by Japan. Thank you for your work. Ohsin (talk) 20:48, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: In retrospective, I guess I thought they were cooperating agencies.  I am glad you figured it out. Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 03:49, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

text: The question in Parliament was result of that false wiki entry that has spawned flurry of flawed and jingoistic articles since mid 2000s! Do not start that train again! Stick to official material. ISRO's project is different and its Winged TSTO concept has no air breathing component to it. Ohsin (talk) 00:56, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt that the Indian Defense News and SpaceFlightInsider get their sources from Wikipedia (2017). But I will leave it be for now. Thanks. BatteryIncluded (talk) 05:11, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry but citation is of a random Youtube video of extremely low quality (I speak the language it is in) and what does 'Indian Defence News' really means here? It is extremely generic name and there are numerous such defence related websites. For example a blog http://www.indiandefencenews.org/ an individual run website http://indiandefencenews.in/about/ and then this http://www.indiandefensenews.in/p/about.html and so on. SpaceFlightInsider dropped the ball there and is very likely basing that on reports from Indian media, if you can, please contact them and seek clarification. Ohsin (talk) 05:50, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

text:  Take look at Page 21 of this newsletter by The Aeronautical Society of India, Hyderabad. It has few details on AVATAR and the eminent scientist who wrote this and came up with concept seems to believe in Ancient aircrafts as well... anyways it is notable that work on it goes back to 1980's and since it has air breathing component to it it is fundamentally separate from winged TSTO concept with bi-propellant fly back booster and upper stage. So that settles any speculative overlap I hope. Meanwhile I have sent few emails around to publishers who are carrying speculative information as facts like this one http://www.spsmai.com/experts-speak/?id=111&q=ISROs-AVATAR-making-India-proud-again Ohsin (talk) 03:50, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  AVATAR has no connection with ISRO. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Avatar (spacecraft). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160805065726/http://dos.gov.in/sites/default/files/USQ251.pdf to http://dos.gov.in/sites/default/files/USQ251.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/spacetransport/spacecraft-avatar.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:13, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Avatar (spacecraft). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151222125628/http://www.scity.gujarat.gov.in/plane-avatar.htm to http://www.scity.gujarat.gov.in/plane-avatar.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:26, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: I can't find anything about a 2016 test flight of the Avatar but there was a 2016 test flight of the RLV, see Hypersonic Flight Experiment. I suggest we just delete that section with the citation needed about first test flight in 2016 and eventual flight in 2025. It may be a confusion with the RLV which if I understand right is a two stage to orbit and not air breathing or able to fly to orbit from a runway. So it's a different project. Robert Walker (talk) 23:59, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes Robert that is the problem! It seems few folks just desperately want to mix AVATAR storyline to very real RLV-TD. RLV-TD program envisages a series of test flights and for HEX the stack had a solid booster (with large control fins) and a winged TDV or technology Development Vehicle on top. In future though TDV would sport a scramjet engine attached to its underbelly for 'SPEX' test flight. ISRO's Scramjet development program so far had ATV D01 and D02 test flights. ATV-D02 flight tested a sub-scaled scramjet engine with 2 kN thrust. ISRO's winged TSTO concept was simply called 'RLV TSTO' in official presentation slides and never AVATAR, this mix-up misinformation with hardly any facts backing it is creation of lazy media reports and overzealous fans. Ohsin (talk) 08:50, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  2016 test flight may be confusion with the RLV