lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:WaferTech

message: Talk:WaferTech
I suggest keeping this page for the following reasons: 1. WaferTech is the largest pure-play foundry in the United States. 2. It is one of the largest employers in Clark County, Washington. 3. The company is recognized as a major firm in Silicon Forest (after Intel of course). I will continue to add more information as I dig it up. Rms1 06:35, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there coverage in reliable, third party sources? Has the company done anything to satisfy WP:CORP? One doesn't get that impression from reading the article as it stands. Also, how can a company be a "pure play" (stock market term) when it's privately held? Who out there can "play" it? Deranged bulbasaur 07:04, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

text: SEC filings are not sufficient for notability. All corporations make them, and they're first party material from the legal department. Deranged bulbasaur 07:40, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Llama hiking

message: This page is horrible. It does indeed look quite like an advertisement. It could probably be cleaned up a bit but it is probably more deserving of being merged.
71.164.208.94 06:36, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This page should not be merged into the main Llama article.  This "article" is about an activity not about the animal.  If possible, it should reference the Llama article but should not be included within it.  --BlindEagletalk~contribs 16:18, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Get real! The guys I hung around with in my 20's & 30's could all tote a 60+ lb backpack up 5000 vertical feet in 6 miles with no problems.  The gals could do the same with a 40-45 lb pack. 71.214.223.133 (talk) 04:49, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What to do? 

message: Lovely picture of a small girl with a small llama. But what has it got to do with the activity of llama trekking? Nick Moyes (talk) 16:08, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it is a rather appealing pic, thank you for complementing it. The girl has the llama on a leash and is in a public space, she's clearly taking the llama for a walk, aka llama hiking. I'd agree it would be even better to have a pic set in the countryside, perhaps with a few more people and llama's in a classic trekking formation. Once such a pic becomes available, no reason not to replace, even if it's less lovely. FeydHuxtable (talk) 09:52, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate Image?
Talk:Charles Upham Memorial Cavalry Champions Belt

message: This is not as easy as it looks. When I try to edit the page I have written I only seem able to write in a "references page". What am I doing wrong?
The only physical written references for the cavalry champions belt are the actual belt itself which is verifiable by visually looking at it, and the written and posted scores for each event in any one year.
These are published within the service rifle shooting fraternity of New Zealand. Does that make them able to be used as a reference? CUMCCB020304 06:38, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Phoenix Mountain Preserve

message: The Phoenix Mountain park system is generally known as the Phoenix Mountain Preserve , less commonly called the Phoenix Mountains Preserve.
Phoenix Mountains Park and Recreation Area is actually a part of the popular Piestewa Peak  (formerly Squaw Peak) area. It's an individual city park .
I'll be moving this page to Phoenix Mountain Preserve shortly, as this seems clear-cut & non-controversial. Pete Tillman (talk) 22:25, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name confusion
Talk:Arizona State University Downtown Phoenix campus

message: Hello Wikipedians! 
I'm considering editing this page to include the updated name for what was formerly Taylor Place Residence Hall. On April 14, the name of the building was officially changed to Gordon Commons to honor former Phoenix mayor Phil Gordon. Here are some links to news coverage of the change: TAYLOR PLACE RESIDENTIAL HALL IN DOWNTOWN PHOENIX RENAMED GORDON COMMONS and another article from The Arizona Republic. 
Additionally, here is a link to the updated building page on the ASU website: Gordon Commons
Specifically, I'm planning on editing the "Residence Halls" section of this page to say "Gordon Commons (formerly Taylor Place)" instead of "Taylor Place."
I'm pretty new to editing on Wikipedia. If anyone has any questions about this let me know! Kateduffy519 (talk) 21:36, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gordon Commons
Talk:Oshō

message: Hello friends,
I am the guilty party for not adding sources when I made a correction in the original. I've now added them. The reference from the dictionaries are as follows for those interested (I removed the macrons above the a's because they don't come out): 
広辞苑：
おしょう【和尚】ヲシヤウ
(梵語upadhyayaの俗語形の音写。師の意) 
＃〔仏〕(特に禅宗でいう。天台宗ではカショウ、律宗・真言宗・真宗等ではワジョウともよむ) 
[株式会社岩波書店 広辞苑第五版]
漢字源：
梵語ボンゴｕｐaｄｈｙaｙａ（親しく教える師匠の意）を西域の［ウテン］でｋｈｏｓｈａと呼び、これを音訳したのが「和尚」であるという。
[改訂新版　漢字源　株式会社学習研究社]
To Julia below, you're close. It is also an old word for a high-class prostitute. Close, but not exactly maidens! See:
上席の遊女の称。そぞろ物語「此の女郎衆の外に、―様と名付け、容色無双の美人達おはしますが」
[株式会社岩波書店 広辞苑第五版]
Cheers
--Gunnermanz (talk) 16:37, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources Added

message: I don't know about it only being a zen term - I saw a reminiscence, an old samurai reflecting on the astounding Osho, or maidens of perfect beauty implying it was a medieval (?) term for young women so beautiful they didn't wear makeup or adorn their hair. I don't know what the reference is, so if anyone knows... please? Julia Rossi 07:17, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Presumably a homonym. Doceirias (talk) 03:56, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Osho perfection
Talk:Amphiprotic

message: I am not competent to authoritatively edit this page but it looks as though "Since they can donate an electron" should be replaced by "Since they can donate a PROTON".
Just like single protons can be donated or accepted, same applies to electrons - transfers are not limited to electron pairs - also single electrons can be transferred between species.Ndzodan 06:15, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Seems to be much commonality between Amphoteric and Amphiprotic. Should these be merged to a single article or should the articles be more distinct? Expert needed. - Leonard G. (talk) 21:16, 2 February 2009
They are related but not identical concepts. Since both articles are short, it would probably be best to merge them to a single article with 2 sections (at least) to make the differences clear. We also need specific examples of molecules which are one and not the other. Since amphoteric is the more common term (503K Google hits compared to 15K for amphiprotic), I suggest the article be named amphoteric, with a redirect from amphiprotic. Other opinions? Dirac66 (talk) 02:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amphoteric vs Amphiprotic
Talk:Sigismondo d'India

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles;  this article is B-class; it could use an image, and perhaps a wider enumeration and discussion of his known works. Read my detailed review on the comments page.  Questions and comments can be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 14:18, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review

message: To add to this article:  why his surname was "d'India" when he was not from India. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article
Talk:Moriori of The Chatham Islands

message: I'm puzzled. As far as I am aware castration of male infants is mentioned by only one observer of the Moriori, without training in anthropology. There appears to be no evidence from any other source, and certainly not from analysis of skeletal remains of the moriori (skeletons, if available, should show the effects of castration on bone growth). 
Given that the Moriori have been demonstrated from genetic studies to have come from east coast Maori people, and given that there is no evidence that castration was a common practice among  New Zealand Maori, this makes the practice by Moriori in the Chathams rather more unlikely.
Further, there is a link from the "moriori castration" sentence to the wikipaedia birth control page. There is no mention on this page of castration as a means of birth control, and quite rightly so, castration of some males is not a particularly effective means of reducing population growth. This is because males, surprisingly, can inseminate multiple female partners.
It would be most unfortunate if the Moriori were identified as using a most bizarre and unlikely culturally sanctioned practice given the extremely slender evidence available.
202.36.151.252 07:42, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the claim, although it doesn't matter since I've now merged this article into Moriori. -- Avenue 01:01, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Nalchity Upazila

message: Hi
Who wrote Nalchity history? It is new and fake and it partiality. We know the ancient history. In may books exist the ancient history. You can't ignore Kalikapur, Mahabharat and ancient Chandra king family. We will accept fake history. These history writer will not accepted. Even we will do case. 
Regards
MD HASAN RASHID Mhasanrashid (talk) 05:35, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Mhasanrashid: So cite those "may books", if they are reliable sources. See WP:42.   — Jeff G. ツ 14:07, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nalchity history is not correct. I ignore it.
Talk:Kalapara Upazila

message: *Potentially Malicious Domain:
*hxxp://www.amaderbarisal.com/ 
*https://www.virustotal.com/de/url/ffbb3c4679f2dd97cc1d56420fe901e70dba501cce671ade32105d2640b1bcba/analysis/1373472177/
*hxxp://www.amaderbarisal.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-polls/polls-js.js?ver=2.63
*https://www.virustotal.com/de/url/e907cda7ee83b0b37dc22d0a57394f79db37a8b2f9e5ffd3bbab99ec9ff0079f/analysis/1373649318/
*TROJ_GEN.F47V1224 
*https://www.virustotal.com/de/file/e74dc2a2eef5cb64763831eac8a3b3c7e60eec6120b520e40194f8c74d3f0555/analysis/1369489807/
*SEE ALSO: http://www.UnmaskParasites.com/security-report/?page=www.amaderbarisal.com
--Gary Dee 17:36, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malware Link Removal 
Talk:Itsu

message: why does this article exist??
it appears to have been created as little more than a promotional tool (albeit an ill-advised one) for the restaurant chain. 212.95.111.200 08:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A lot of company articles can look like that to start with.  Whilst on its own a 10-location chain probably wouldn't pass WP:NOT, Itsu is a bit of a special case as the scene of the polonium poisoning and being "what Metcalfe did next" after the big success of Pret. FlagSteward 02:52, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: User:Itsoho, editing the Itsu article to "just help a client of mine modifying his wiki page", made this edit to this talk page after being told to discuss any possible changes, replacing the entire page with a rewrite of the article. I assume this is meant to be taken as a suggestion that the rewrite in question be applied to the article. --McGeddon (talk) 17:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed edit
Talk:Septoplasty

message: A quick glance of the history indicates that this page has been vandalized. I would recommend semi-protection.
--Substantiate 08:00, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The vandalism you mentioned is not in large enough numbers to warrant semi protection. See the protection policy for more info. Harryboyles 11:06, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for semi-protection

message: It's not clear how long the splints should be kept in place. Is it just one day?  Pgr94 (talk) 16:18, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This may take three days or so.  And the doctor has to remove it. Afalbrig (talk) 06:32, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Splints should typically stay for a week, and patients should get antibiotics to cover for gram positive organisms while the splints are in place. Prophylax (talk) 20:16, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splints 

message: Should the section on surgical details be expanded (eg, to include different types of incisional approaches)? Prophylax (talk) 20:17, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surgical details
Talk:Prince Frederick Adolf, Duke of Östergötland

message: It is not improbable that this relationship was the basis for the musical comedy "Eine Kleine Nachtsmusik".                  210.50.16.21 08:00, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why list a Swedish prince under a non-Swedish, more Danish-sounding spelling? Why not just list him as (Prince) Fredrik Adolf of Sweden? Tomas e (talk) 14:49, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In English, this man should be listed as Frederick Adolph. SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:10, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name? 

message: Why the long and cumbersome article name? Why not just Frederick Adolph of Sweden? There has been only one and isn't likely to be another. Since when do we put titles and nations in personal names when naming WP articles? Simplicity! SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:10, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: This phrase, used several times in the first couple paragraphs, still showed the singular verb "was" . . . did someone change the article to include the mention of his sister? Is it necessary to include the mention of his sister? If someone would like to edit again, please feel free, accd'g to Wikipedia's guidelines.
Ed8r (talk) 14:53, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: If this is just a question of correcting a mistake in the English language, then feel free to correct it - all editors do not have an English language background and may therefore unintentionally make language errors - I myself have made several additions to this article (I don't recall if it includes this specific meaning), but as I am not a native English speaker, I may have made language errors without being aware of it, so please feel free to correct it. Perhaps it should be "him and his sister" (?), but not being native in the English language, I do not feel confident enough to correct it.--Aciram (talk) 17:41, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  he and his sister
Talk:Louisiana (New Spain)

message: To me, the following sentence makes no sense. Can someone who knows the meaning improve it?
:"The Acadian (Cajun) migration begins with French settlers from Quebec and settlers on the east side of the Mississippi who had been ordered to leave from the new Native American migrating to Louisiana which they believe is still French controlled land west of the Mississippi as well as New Orleans"
- Parsa (talk) 00:38, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor wording 

message: Maybe you should read Bernardo de Gálvez y Madrid, Count of Gálvez and then rewrite this article.--Alfredalva (talk) 01:10, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: While it would be nice to have this article fleshed out and taken away from the list format to an actual text article, what good would it do to duplicate the information from another article here? Heiro 01:14, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite this article 
Talk:Salirophilia

message: I am for the merging of wet and messy fetishism and this article. Anyone else?Lotusduck 08:15, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you find a published source that supports your claim? Certainly nothing in either article suggests that difference. Lotusduck 17:02, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So merge Saliromania to WAM if that's the way you feel about it.Lotusduck 18:06, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

text: so what's the protocol, propose the merger and wait for comments, or just go ahead and do it? Urso 19:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

text: you know, if it was up to me, I'd leave both articles as they are. Lets leave it a while and see if anyone else has an opinion Urso 21:52, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Well, I can't really cite any sources except my own brain (and I guess, UMD.net), but WAM is a fairly broad area. WAM in general is the fetish of experiencing being messy, and doing the dirty while messy. Yes that can include making your partner messy, but this article seems to be more worthy to merge with domination and humiliation. mattbuck 01:04, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: It seems like salirophila would be a more appropriate title for this article. the -mania suffix seems to refer less to the typical form of the fetish and more to an unhealthy obsession. I propose we give the matter one weeks to be discussed and come to a decision about the move. Fsecret 20:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to salirophila

message: what idiot redirected it from sweat fetish? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.35.213.226 (talk • contribs).
:Please don't make personal attacks.  See the policies WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. Robotman1974 23:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, some dictionaries define the word as "ingestion of sweat or saliva", e.g. Hickey's Sex Crimes and Paraphilia (2006; page 84). Equinox ◑ 07:27, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  idiot 

message: The two fetishes are related but not so closely that they need to be the same article. Much like how spanking in BDSM is different than spanking and adult baby. The element of dirt/spanking is in common, but the end results are quite different.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MunchingZombie (talk • contribs) 23:32, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seperate Salirophilia and Mysophilia 
Talk:Imine

message: I don't think many people have really looked at either page that much since they've been written, so I'll just do it myself if I don't get any feedback about it in a week or so. Ghiles 08:22, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

message: (to the tune of "Oh, My Darling Clementine")
Oh, my ketone! Oh, my ketone!
And my primary amine.
You reacted, lost some water and
You formed a new imine.
Now the lone pair on the N then
Bonds with carbonyl C.
Pi electrons go to O, a
Proton shifts fast as can be.
Now the O is feeling greedy
Grabs an H from OH3.
Free electrons from the N then
Form a pi bond, water leaves.
Now the N is protonated
And a plus charge can be seen.
So the water yanks the H off
And we've formed a new imine.
Oh, my ketone! Oh, my ketone!
And my primary amine.
You reacted, lost some water and
You formed a new imine.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.32.155.203 (talk) 18:39, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Oh, My Ketone!

message: I don't know how to change pictures for articles but the picture in this article is most definitely NOT an imine.  It's a trisubstituted olefin.  It doesn't even contain a nitrogen!  Please change.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.30.129.32 (talk) 20:28, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect image

message: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hbf878 (talk • contribs) 12:41, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Figure for synthesis 

message: I propose to merge Aldimine into Imine. The aldimine article is a stub, and has seen little to no significant editing since 2011. Aldimines are simply a subset of imines, and the ketimine article already redirects to this article. Very little from the aldimine article isn't already covered in the imine article, so this would almost be a straight redirect. I've added the appropriate templates on both pages concerned.
Disclaimer: I am new to wiki editing, so sincere apologies if I'm flaunting any conventions or treading on any toes.RRBinwood (talk) 23:36, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: It turns out that aldimine comes in trans- and cis-forms, for instance when the substituents form intramolecular hydrogen bonds.
Who can add some sane information about this?
Thanks in advance, Simon de Danser (talk) 10:57, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Isomerism
Talk:Chris Alden

message: I'm assuming that the user Calden is the Chris Alden talked about in the article, based on the edit history, so I've added the above  template to the talk page. If I'm wrong, please feel free to revert me. --Ciaran H 11:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you look at the first few revisions of this talk page, you see Mr Alden stating that he has created this page about himself (information he subsequently removed). Marginal notability at best; I'd suggest prod, but he would probably object, so perhaps straight to AfD. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 17:57, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calden = Chris Alden? 

message: What does this stand for? - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 03:49, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "J" in Christopher J. Alden
Talk:Flora Danica

message: A word of caution. Scans / photographic images of this work is in all likelihood PD under US law. However, the same is not the case under Danish law. In Denmark, such works are protected 50 years from the creation of the actual photograph. The Danish National Library of Science and Medicine (Danmarks Natur- og Lægevidenskabelige Bibliotek)  received government funding from the Danish Ministry of Culture for digitizing the entire work but expressly demanded that the Danish Wikipedia remove the copies of some of these illustrations that had been uploaded there. In short: the version digitized in 1998 in Copenhagen won't be PD under Danish law before 2048 unless the archive either changes its mind later or Danish law is amended. For the moment, please don't upload such images to the Wikimedia Commons. Any such images uploaded to the English Wikipedia should be expressly tagged with "Fair use" to avoid these images being copied to the Commons. Valentinian T / C 19:29, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not upload images to Commons from the version digitized by the University of Copenhagen 
Talk:Mead–Conway VLSI chip design revolution

message: I cannot understand, why this article should need a clean-up. It is well written and describes the breakthrough of an important Disruptive Innovation by convincing masses of educators word-wide.Rainier3 08:47, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A couple points,  It has issues with non-idiomatic English, which makes much of it's meaning opaque to readers unfamiliar with the subject.  (I'm personally familiar with the subject, and still own a copy of the relevant textbook.) In addition, there are some punctuation issues and so forth, and lacks footnotes. Still, I'll try and clean some of this up, and leave more specific and useful tags for any issues that I feel remain.  --joe deckertalk to me 17:39, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

text: The following sententences are not correct English, I believe. They're confusing to me at least: "Immediately after invention and commercialization of the integrated circuit, when only a hundred or less transistors have been on a chip, the design has been co-located with integrated circuit technology.", "[...] so that because of the high circuit complexity more and more the device physics experts have not really been well qualified.". It sounds like it's written by a German, judging by the overuse of "has been" and "have been". But it should be fairly easy to clean up by someone who's knowledgeable in the field (which I'm not).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Runesvend (talk • contribs) 10:11, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's nowhere close to idiomatic English. Beyond the verb structure "colocated with" is a dead giveaway. — MaxEnt 01:40, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The language is still a mess. The opening sentence is incomprehisible to a general audience and written with extremely poor grammar, even for knowledgeable readers. For example what does a 'revolution' and 'academic materials'  actually mean? I think these words should be replaced with something a bit more concrete. Ashmoo (talk) 08:55, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled comment

message: Spam comment redacted. — MaxEnt 01:40, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poultry bissines 

message: Contributions (talk) 09:30, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: , , etc. --j⚛e deckertalk 14:11, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  how do e know this isnt bogus self promotion. A revolution?? 

message: While this is not a merge proposal, it would be good to delineate what this page covers over and above the VLSI Project and vice versa. — MaxEnt 01:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a merge proposal