Talk:Hudud Ordinances

message: This entire article seems POV to me....
:Me too, although I don't have any argument with protecting women's rights. In fact, my wife is one. A woman, that is. 
:The challenge is to rewrite all the new info neutrally. What I just reverted sounds like an anti-Hudood editorial. --Uncle Ed 20:35, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I followed it all the way through in media, papers, and expert opinions. There was a very very critical essay and a lecture given by Mufti Taqi Usmani which is almost non existent in the arguments regarding the support of this ordinance. hudoodordinance.com link is broken. It didn't count as credible either. I am putting up this POV tag again. Kindly discuss it here before removing it. —  Hamza   [ talk ] 09:51, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Then someone needs to take the initiative instead of leaving the tag up for eternity. i've tried a new section, but it needs the legal language for all the pakistanis out there.Lihaas (talk) 11:02, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV? 

message: Cut from article:
:The Ordinance is most criticized for criminalizing all extra-marital sex (zina), and making it exceptionally difficult and dangerous to prove an allegation of rape. (strikout markup for deleted part)
Who has criticized it for criminalizing voluntary sex like adultery or premarital intercourse? I haven't seen anything like that, in or out of Wikipedia. The only criticism I've seen is that of the double standard which punishes a woman but condones a man, for the same act. 
This, by the way, is a major ethical/moral difference between Christianity and Islam. Recall the New Testament account of Jesus and the woman caught in the act of adultery. --Uncle Ed 17:38, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sex and rape

message: Reference numbers 3 and 9 are repeated, and 9 should be deleted. Reference 3 is better than 9 because it has a link to Taqi Usmani.
I tried to edit the page, but apparently the references are not editable. Can someone explain how to edit them (or just do the edit). Thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arif Zaman (talk • contribs) 06:41, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repeated Reference 

message: have made a lot of changes and additions to the article, undoing some of AJillani's changes.  Over four years no Pakistan expert ever showed up. I hope it makes the article more useful and informative to the average reader. --BoogaLouie (talk) 03:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes and additions 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Hudood Ordinances. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071229095410/http://www.hrcp-web.org/NCSW_Report.cfm to http://www.hrcp-web.org/NCSW_Report.cfm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141129025158/http://www.violenceisnotourculture.org/faq_stoning to http://www.violenceisnotourculture.org/faq_stoning
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071020232626/http://www.hrcp-web.org/pdf/ar_2004/2-2.pdf to http://www.hrcp-web.org/pdf/ar_2004/2-2.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121103152201/http://asiapacific.amnesty.org/apro/aproweb.nsf/pages/svaw_hudoo to http://asiapacific.amnesty.org/apro/aproweb.nsf/pages/svaw_hudoo
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:04, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:53, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion