lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Thespesius

message: Olshevsky indicates that many species were reassigned to Thespesius in the early twentieth century: Thespesius agilis, Thespesius altidens,
Thespesius annectens, Thespesius arctatus,  Thespesius calamarius,  Thespesius grallipes, Thespesius marginatus, Thespesius pentagonus, Thespesius perangulatus, Thespesius selwyni and Thespesius stenopsis, but apart from T. agilis, named by Hay, it isn't mentioned who exactly did the renaming. Would anyone know this?--MWAK (talk) 07:58, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Other species
Talk:Torvosaurus

message: Somebody should change that picture. It's terrible. It looks like a kid drew it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.199.207.155 (talk) 04:54, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: picture

message: It has always been my understanding (and I'm 95% sure) that Torvosaurus was primarily a Kimmeridgian theropod, displaced and replaced by overgrown Allosaurs by the Tithonian (Bakker used that example to "prove" his singlular apex predator theory, i.e. no large Allosaur/ Torvosaurus coexistence), but the article and 21 year old source says otherwise. I'm pretty sure Torvosaurus is listed all over the web as Kimmer- early Tith, but I'm a relative n00b and don't know how to add links to sources and I will not change the article until I can source it.
:You're right, I'll fix this. It appears to have been entirely Kimmeridgian in North America. The early Tithonian record is from Portugal. Dinoguy2 (talk) 22:50, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Torvosaurus time 

message: Shouldn't we mention the fact of the genus having embryos or eggs found here?
http://www.nature.com/srep/2013/130530/srep01924/full/srep01924.html - Link for anybody interested.
--Paleontology is a wonderful thing. Shame many people outside of science don't understand the many dinosaurs aren't what they used to be. (talk) 17:36, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eggs and Embryos 

message: Seems all recent papers suggest these are synonyms, so should redirect here. FunkMonk (talk) 23:54, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Edmarka]] and [[Brontoraptor]] 

message: Is it appropriate to have Ceratosaurus ingens and Megalosaurus ingens as synonims "in part"? We are talking about possibly undiagnostic teeth... Brutonyx20 (talk) 08:04, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: We could add question marks, as I just did, we usually do that with tentatively assigned synonyms. JurassicClassic767 (talk | contribs) 15:30, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synonims 

message: Any papers giving an estimate? That's a pretty big lower jaw.104.169.31.99 (talk) 01:48, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  bite force
Talk:Trachodon

message: There is no such taxon as Trachodon atavus Cope, 1871. I searched Cope's 1871 work on Google Books (http://books.google.com/books?id=hP0CAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_atb#v=onepage&q&f=false) and there is no mention of Trachodon. Therefore, Trachodon atavus is a typographical error made by Weishampel and Horner (1990) and Horner et. al. (2004).68.4.61.237 (talk) 00:55, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:Trialestes

message: Because the forelimbs assigned to Trialestes are more consistent with a basal crocodylomorph than with a dinosaur (Clark et. al., 2000), Trialestes is probably a chimera of crocodylomorph and dinosaurian material. The name Trialestes, in this case, will be attached to the dinosaurian material and the forelimb material will have no scientific name. Indeed, there will be a revision of the global Triassic dinosaur record (Irmis et. al., in prep.).
Clark, J. M., H- D., Sues, and D. S. Berman, 2000. A new specimen of Hesperosuchus agilis from the Upper Triassic of New Mexico and the interrelationships of basal crocodylomorph archosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 20(4):683-704.
Irmis, R.E. and Nesbitt, S.J., in preparation. Revision of the global Triassic dinosaur record. 68.4.61.237 (talk) 23:24, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dinosaurian status of Trialestes
Talk:Tuojiangosaurus

message: The December 2007 issue of National Geographic says that tuojiangosaurus had an extra pair of spikes coming out through the shoulders.  Why do other sources not show them?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.246.227.19 (talk) 05:15, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is probably based on the old misidentification of Gigantspinosaurus as a Tuojiangosaurus exemplar. Remember that the shoulder spines are not parts of the skeleton peeking through :o). They are skin ossifications covered by horn.--MWAK (talk) 19:12, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shoulder spikes 

message: Gregory S. Paul restores this with three pairs of tail spikes in his 2010 field guide. What is the basis for this, and is it even valid? FunkMonk (talk) 16:32, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The thagomizer arrangement shown by Paul is based on the "Chungkingosaurus sp. 3" specimen CV 00208, an articulated tail end with spikes. Paul assumes that the four Chungkingosaurus species and Tuojiangosaurus are one and the same. Maidment (2006) concludes that Chungkingosaurus is valid but most of the material could not be found (indeed of both genera!). Reading Dong (1983), I personally believe Paul is right as the qualitative distinguishing traits suggested are indeed vague, illusions caused by damage or ontology-dependent. That leaves the size difference but Chungkingosaurus specimen CV 00207 is a pelvis larger than that of Tuojiangosaurus.--MWAK (talk) 19:02, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of tail spikes
Talk:Cream (disambiguation)

message: It states that the band was English. Jack Bruce is Scottish, so it should realy be the 'British band Cream'  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Larkman (talk • contribs) 11:34, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The English band Cream

message: Anyone have any objections to have the wu-tang song C.R.E.A.M. on this disambigious page?--Gephart 22:28, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have, and have had, no objection to it being on this page for a while now. What I do object to is your expansion of its entry here into a mini-article. Is it so hard to create an article for the song? Ewlyahoocom 03:29, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: C.R.E.A.M.

message: Which is preferable, the French spelling "crème" or the anglicized "creme?" Is there a Wikipedia policy? We seem to be using both but I think we should pick one. "Creme de banane" vs "crème de cacao" for example. Rees11 (talk) 02:33, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: A lotion is lower viscosity than a cream. (As our article correctly points out.)  Yet there doesn't seem to be any article that could be home to hand cream or facial cream.  Moisturizer, which is another wiki redirect, are a subcategory of both skin crams and lotions.  We do have Cold cream.  This is the closest to original, but also makes a poor jump off point.  (I'll add it to the article for now.  I don't know if this is the right place to ask for s.o. to sort it out, but I hope s.o. who knows is going to find this.  71.236.26.74 (talk) 22:34, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skin Cream
Talk:Hellcat Records

message: I took the liberty, before I registered my name, of adding that Westbound Train has indeed been signed by hellcat, and the new record should be out later in 2006.
Also, should the Live Freaky Die Freaky movie be added into this page? --DJ Citizen D 22:30, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

message: any source to verify 1997 as founding year would be appreciated. Alt-F4 07:10, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founded 

message: Isn't the official name of the label Hellcat Records, not HellCat Records? Pietaster 19:59, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Los Difuntos, a psychobilly band from L.A., announced on their blog that they have officially signed to Hellcat. (The fact that they were about to be signed was a popular rumour for quite a while.) Even though they were featured on the last Hellcat sampler, Hellcat has yet to officially announce it (unlike with their other new signing, Society's Parasites) so I have not added them to the list yet. Inanechild 03:22, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Los Difuntos 

message: The Transplants should be moved from Former Bands to Defunct Bands, as they have broken up and not been dropped from the label (which would be technically impossible as Tim Armstrong is part of that band). —Preceding unsigned comment added by GeddyIsGodYYZ (talk • contribs) 18:25, 30 October 2006
:It's not impossible. Just because a band member owns a record label doesn't mean that band has to release everything through that label. They're most recent album was not on Hellcat, it was on LaSalle Records or something like that, which is Travis Barker's label. I think they are fine under Former bands. Joltman 12:13, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transplants 

message: Shouldn't Operation Ivy be included somewhere in the defunctant bands list since hellcat is re-releasing their album Energy? Or shouldn't it be mentioned somewhere else in article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.141.184.66 (talk) 04:00, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Operation Ivy Release
Talk:Fat Camp (South Park)

message: Cite please;
Cartman's plan to sell candy to the other campers is reminiscent of the plot of the 1982 young adult novella Jelly Belly. While Cartman was making himself a toaster pastry chocolate-mix butter bar he was humming the song You'll Never Find Another Love Like Mine by Lou Rawls.
Alastairward (talk) 13:18, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited material 

message: I though that when Cartman was selling candy to the other campers was a parody of An Officer and a Gentleman when Mayo sells equipment to his roommates for them to pass Foley's equipment checks.  Matthew W. A. Ellis (talk) 23:51, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yawn, not this again. If you can dig up a cite to support that, please do so. Otherwise you're wasting space on the talk page.Alastairward (talk) 20:27, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cartman Selling Candy
Talk:Rance Tidal Power Station

message: The quoted costs are not attributed to any source nor dated.  They are almost certainly wrong and certainly misleading.  In particular the ongoing production costs, like most renewable sources after recovery of initial costs, are extremely low.  Comparison with other sources of electricity should probably not be made without quoting a detailed analysis or at least explaining the basis.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.211.11.136 (talk) 18:10, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is useful information at https://tethys.pnnl.gov/project-sites/la-rance-tidal-barrage.  Deipnosophista (talk) 07:32, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: * Follow-on - nothing was ever accomplished the first time, but the second time used experience of the first, so 'follow-on'. 'Follow-up' has conmnotation of either expanding on previous work or remedial work (as in 'a follow-up visit to the doctor's')
* metres/meters - both spellings acceptable on wiki, but it needs to be consistent within the article, and normal policy is the first version stands, otherwise it turns into revert wars on UK/US spelling (see Jewelry for a prime example of this) 
Bridesmill 12:51, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you try using the co-ords at the top of the article? Googling on the name of an administrative district will rarely happen to find a specific location within that district unless the district is very small and the location happens to be very central within the district. Googling the vatican might find St Peter's Square, but googling Bretagne isn't likely to hit a specific river mouth. DMcMPO11AAUK/Talk/Contribs 21:02, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Explaining trans
Talk:Pacific Disaster Center

message: I noticed that excluding copyediting and maintenance edits, the substance of the  was contributed pretty much entirely by editors with no contributions to other articles. Some of these editors have indicated their conflict of interest; they are now listed as connected contributors at the top of this talk page. Another has had their edits  for blatantly promotional language; one more cannot be outed and is left as an exercise for the curious (reminder: no WP:OUTING!). Considering that all these edits were made many years ago (including some predating the development of formal COI guidelines) and the users have not been active since, I see no need to pursue the issue at this time by reporting them or applying page protection. Adding the COI edit notice tag at the top of this page for additional vigilance should suffice.
Tagged the article with  to solicit further checks / editing passes to ensure NPOV. I can't take care of it right now but will come back to it later if someone else hasn't already done it by then. — 2406:3003:2077:1E60:C998:20C6:8CCF:5730 (talk) 05:20, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI editing
Talk:Georgia Association of Broadcasters

message: I was just about to make a dismbiguation page, but I have to ask, is this information even notable? GAB is also the acronym for the Grants Management, Accounting and Budget personnel in the Multnomah County Health Department. This informal group has gained official recognition within the department by addressing and solving issues with a casual but effective style. Founding members were Karen Garber, Bill Leidy, Pat McDade, Debra Newton and Richard Showalter.
If not, it should be removed.--Rockero 22:41, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, not the slightest bit notable, and irrelevant to the article anyway; I've removed it. Disambiguator (talk) 18:54, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable
Talk:Vanadium(III) chloride

message: Very interesting point.  Yes the traditional V(III) coordination cmpds are all triplet ground states not matter how you look at them.  Of course one could wonder if your cmpd is not an imide, i.e. R3V=N-N=VR3.  But the point would be worth noting. --Smokefoot 05:20, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Exactly!
Talk:Mirabelle plum

message: Some confusion here. Mirabelle and Cherry_Plum both mention Lorraine as producing 15,000 tons or 70% of the world's production of this fruit. But they are different species, Mirabelle is Prunus Domestica Insititia, Cherry Plum or Myrobalan is Prunus Cerasifera. I don't know which is correct, since I came to Wikipedia hoping to find the correct answer!
: Only this article has the mention of the fruit tonnage, although no ref yet !DavidAnstiss (talk) 18:18, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

message: Since 1996 the mirabelle de Lorraine has been recognized and promoted by the EU as a high-quality regional product, with a Protected Geographical Indication (PGI).
Whoever added this should have had no trouble finding a reference for this, actually, they would ideally have added this because they saw the source for this somewhere.
But then again… if I or anyone went through this marking everything that was without a reference (a good reference, Thrillist for example is a rag and not a good source) you couldn't see the (unreferenced) text for all the [citation needed]s --jae (talk) 14:36, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  PGI?  Reference? 

message: I have a large mirabelle plum tree in my garden, in Whitehead, Northern Ireland, at latitude 57.76°. It produces a moderate crop of fruit around 25mm in diameter (the Metz cultivar perhaps), and they ripen in late July or early August.
I can't detect the tree in an aerial photo from the 1930's, which may put a limit on its age. 84.13.228.127 (talk) 14:28, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Northern Limit?
Talk:LView

message: This article doesn't really need all of those tags. That's kind of overkill. A simple cleanup would do it. — ßottesiηi Tell me what's up 22:47, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Cleanup" might feel nicer but it isn't as constructive, nor does it explain the problems, all of which I stand by. Melchoir 23:08, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Page will be cleaned up soon, the criticism was well founded (and I have requested that some other pages be deleted). I will strive for more neutrality and purpose in the future, please forgive my impetuosity and thank you both for the help. CoolMoon Corp 00:11, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Paul Reiser

message: Can we get some information about his parents and his background? The article seems to be lacking in his life history.--71.141.146.245 22:49, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: For some reason in the one paragraph describing his bookwork, there are three listed, and right after them, it says "both appeared on the new york times bestseller list".  This is grammatically incorrect.  Three books with "both" listed, just doesn't make sense.  Would someone care to correct this to make it seem less confusing?   JJGeneral1 (talk) 23:02, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three books listed 

message: there is a bit of unsourced claims here, such as him being the 77th best comedian.  It should be cited, or deleted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coemgenv (talk • contribs) 22:50, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  unsourced 

message: Paul Reiser stated in June of 2017, on a relatively well-known internet talk show (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AueMo4XVkAc), that he was actually 61 years old, not 60, as the date frequently listed in the media as his birthdate would suggest.  He explained that his birthdate has erroneously been reported one year off the true year for decades, ever since an interviewer early in his career miscalculated it; and that accordingly, he is actually one year older than sites like Wikipedia currently indicate.  Based on Paul Reiser's own detailed statements during the June 2017 talk show interview, then, his true date of birth would be March 30, 1956, not 1957, a currently stated on Wikipedia.  I haven't tried to make the change, because I have no idea if it's acceptable to support an edit with this sort of audio evidence.  I leave it up for discussion, if anyone's interested.  azaner 05:52, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds Right, being bold TjoeC (talk) 17:20, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  True Age 

message: This doesn't seem to pass WP:NBOOKS, could/should be merged. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:08, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Babyhood book
Talk:Kremenchuk Reservoir

message: I wonder, were there any negative effects from creating this huge reservoir?  Did some historical towns have to be flooded?  How significant was the ecological impact?  I hope someone can add this, as I have no way of obtaining this information. Balcer 22:50, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There may well be. The creation of the Kiev Water Reservoir was a huge disaster and a permanent threat to Kiev. There might be something here as well --Irpen 02:11, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Negative consequences
Talk:Primary School Leaving Examination

message: Okay. Any suggestions on what direction this article should be heading towards? Elle vécut heureuse à jamais (Be eudaimonic!) 22:52, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Party school

message: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11233-022-09109-4 this paper seems like it might have good information that could fit in this article but I can't access it. Moritoriko (talk) 03:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Research paper 

message: Perhaps this article could use some expansion. Besselfunctions 22:55, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is funny. I was just thinking the exact opposite. Can anybody explain what this nonsense is doing in an encyclopaedia? --DanielRigal (talk) 22:31, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: I think this article would benifit from a more world wide approach. I have heard from some sources that a number of European institutions have reputations for wildness. One example is Letterkenny Institute of Technology in Ireland. Perhaps someone can look into this. Piercetp 04:25, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Party schools world wide 

message: I see that my tags were taken off but I don't see why. To be honest I see this article as an AfD candidate. It is an article that recounts some completely arbitrary lists of dubious interest or significance. Its existence has confused at least one new author to make a spurious "top 10" article of his own on a different subject, which was as a mistake made in good faith. In fact, it was him who drew my attention here when we were discussing why his article was getting deleted.
Despite this, I am not sending the article to AfD right now. The article is linked elsewhere and there is external coverage. I am not saying that "If it is good enough for Encarta it is good enough for Wikipedia", but I am open to being persuaded. What would make all the difference would be for this to be converted into a properly referenced article without the lists. In other words, and article about the lists not of the lists. I will wait and see if there is progress here. If not, I may send it to AfD. --DanielRigal (talk) 16:17, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does this belong in an encyclopedia?
Talk:Pachysandra

message: The article states that there are 4 or 5 species of Pachysandra, but then lists 3 or 4. Could this be clarified?
- Jack Vermicelli 2warped@gmail.com 75.72.9.87 (talk) 17:47, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a few sources but I couldn't quickly find a definitive answer on this. Anyone have better info? Kingdon (talk) 20:29, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: how many species?

message: ????!!!!  Too coarsely toothed for what or whom?  Am changing this to "a coarsely toothed margin."  Kostaki mou (talk) 23:11, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  " an entirely too coarsely toothed margin"
Talk:Quebecor World

message: What's the source for the text added as of this revision:  ??? It reads like a press release. If it's from an external source perhaps it could be cited? ++Lar: t/c 23:00, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to today's news (in French), Quebecor World has filed for creditor protection in Canada (CCAA) and in the US (Chapter 11) and might go bankrupt.
Excerpt: « Quebecor World Inc. (TSX: IQW, NYSE: IQW) today announced that the Board of Directors of the Company has authorized it to file for creditor protection under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) in Canada. A number of Quebecor World’s U.S. subsidiaries are also covered by the CCAA filing in Canada as well as in the United States under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Application under the CCAA will be heard by the Quebec Superior Court on January 21, 2008 and the filing under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code will be made in the Southern Judicial District of New York. »
Hugo Dufort (talk) 14:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bankrupcy