lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Republican People's Party

message: Most of these "ideology" is copied from Turkish Wikipedia. They have other manual of style who allows infobox spam, here you should keep it relevant without unnecessary make up, also it is not supported in body. Shadow4dark (talk) 18:13, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox spam 

message: Don't remove Treasurer from infobox. 78.177.162.79 (talk) 09:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  PLEASE 

message: CHP is generally considered left in Turkey and center-left by the international media. The leader of the party, Özgür Özel, urges his party as "CHP should not forget its Left-wing identity." See: https://www.birgun.net/haber/chp-li-ozgur-ozel-chp-nin-sol-sosyal-demokrat-kimligini-unutmamasi-gerekiyor-446344
In Turkey, CHP is generally called "a left-wing party", very few people say it is "center-left", and with its new leader it is more left-wing than before. See: https://www.duvarenglish.com/amp/turkish-main-opposition-chps-new-leader-ozel-vows-implementation-of-left-policies-news-63382
I think CHP's political position should be changed to "Center-left and Left". Mstf221 (talk) 08:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Mstf221 This is because political labels work differently in Turkish. Turkish does not make use of the word merkez sol often (and therefore the term sol is used inclusively for all left-leaning ideologies), and even then CHP belongs to the Left of Center tradition. The vast majority of English-language sources use the term center-left. Uness232 (talk) 04:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

text: I would strongly disagree, in Turkey, there isn't really a centre left, it is usually classified as left, center or right. CHP is DEFINETLY center-left, even further, just center. Youprayteas talk/contribs 18:26, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  CHP and Left 

message: This is also a left wing nationalist party as made obvious by the speeches provided by the vast majority of their senior ranking members such as Mansur yavaş or imamoglu. 92.40.197.154 (talk) 01:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Left wing nationalism  

message: There are indeed members of this party whom want the country to join the European Union. However the majority o supporters of the party and members of which are either neutral or strongly opposed to the party. Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu alongside other senior members of the party have even publicly stated that they want to follow neither the west nor the east but only the path of Atatürk. As made evident by the republic protests in 2007 the core principles of the party and voter base of said party remain widely opposed to membership of the European Union 92.40.197.152 (talk) 02:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referring to this party as pro European is misleading
Talk:List of traffic circles in Washington, D.C.

message: This page can still use some work.  I made it as a result of a discussion with my co-workers, we had thought every circle was named after a general.  We were wrong.  Perhaps I will merge this with Squares in Washington, since they often serve a similar purpose.--Niro5 22:29, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What about the cirlce around the Lincoln Memorial?  Does that count? SDC 18:25, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm hesitant to add either the Lincoln Memorial circle or Observatory circle because neither of them acts like a traffic circle as described in the link at the top of the page. I purposely did not include either of these circles or some others (like Kalorama Circle) for that reason. Let me know if you agree .--Niro5 21:59, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: By the capitalization of "Circle" in the article's title, I took it to refer to any roadway named "Circle" which is why I added Observatory Circle, but not The Ellipse for example. I don't believe the circle around the Lincoln Memorial is named and so wouldn't qualify. It also doesn't for a complete circle. This standard also has the advantage of avoiding the dozens of tiny, unnamed traffic circles around the city (e.g. 3rd & G, SW) not to mention the hundreds of circular driveways. --dm (talk) 04:26, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at a map, I see it is officially "Lincoln Memorial Circle" and thus am adding it. --dm (talk) 04:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lincoln Memorial Circle

message: I don't think Stanton Square should be on here, since it's technically not a roundabout - it's a square. Plus according to Google, it's called Stanton Park, and there is no street called Stanton Square - I think the actual road is called Seward Square. But if we add Stanton/Seward Square, we'd have to add Lincoln, Franklin, Farragut, McPherson, etc. Maybe they could be a separate section in this article for squares? Thoughts?  --Awiseman 03:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and I removed it. I removed Mt Vernon Square from this page for similar reasons. —dm (talk) 05:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stanton Square?

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. After extended time for discussion, consensus in favor of the move has become clear.  BD2412 T 00:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: List of circles in Washington, D.C. →  – For clarity GnocchiFan (talk) 21:41, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

text: support. current title is amusingly unclear. ltbdl (talk) 06:46, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Support per clarity and so it’s not confusing (although an article about circles in Washington woulda been cool…). DirtySocks357(WreckItRalph) (talk) 02:49, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 March 2024
Talk:Messenger bag

message: What is the difference between a Messenger bag and a satchel. This should be included in the article.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.193.129.99 (talk) 04:39, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is clarified in the Satchel (bag) article. Rakerman (talk) 19:08, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Messenger Bag Vs Satchel

message: There are some styles of bags that have a single strap designed and the bag moulded in such a way as to fit only on your upper or mid back.  e.g.  Should these also be considered messenger bags, despite the definition specifying lower back? Rakerman (talk) 19:25, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upper/Mid Back 

message: Why were the external links for the bag reviews and the brand list removed? Completly un-necessary. I would say that those are helpful links and are not link spam. the bag reviews page is quite helpful and informative. As long as that content is not included in the article (which would make it NPOV) I see no reason not to have it in the article. The list of companies should be listed too. I will reinsert the reviews page but won't put in the company list yet. --Tainter 18:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, as an ex-courier my view is it should be there. It adds to the article as a whole. Mathmo Talk 14:54, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I second that: Both  and  are very useful sites. Unless someone protests, I'll just be bold and add the info again next week Tierlieb (talk) 14:34, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I disagree, messenger bags are a specific type of bag, the IFBMA list is most credible, if it needs updating just email them. Some "messenger bags" are not messenger bags and with no commercial list of companies there is no need to confirm if the links are to actual messenger bag companies. Let the IFBMA, actual messengers have that headaache  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.183.23.89 (talk) 19:26, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  external links 

message: Why does fag bag redirect here?  Most people use it to denote a fanny pack.  Halofanatic333 (talk) 12:30, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Huntington Beach High School/to do

message: There're a lot of things that need to be done to bring this article up to the level it should be. This is a continuing list, feel free to add to it.
*Wikify all sections to include 
:*bolded significant names, places, etc.
:*cross-links between related articles
*Remove all POV, of which there is a considerable amount of.
*Collect statistics for sidebar
*Upload images from past
:*get from old Cauldrons
:*newspaper clippings
:*internet sources that will allow our use
*Expand history sections, copy edit and remove redundancy
:*Information about Stillwagon Auditorium
::*who he was
::*his contributions
::*building information
::*war memorial
::*uses of the bell tower (both practical and iconic)
::*events that occur at the auditorium (i.e. Ms. Teen HB, etc.)
:*Surfing program should be a featured section
:*Expand sports sections to include CIF championships, records
:*Entertainment and Tourism Academy
:*Long-time faculty? 
:*Many, MANY other things can be done with this
:*Watch verb tense
*Verify all information as fact
WesleyPinkham 08:33, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Te Henga / Bethells Beach

message: Images make the article look Kai Pai, well done to whom took them. Brian | (Talk) 22:37, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks, some more at  and all my wiki contributed images here User:Paul_Moss/gallery User:Paul_Moss/gallery although its a mission to keep them in a matrix, as i add them. I'm doin Piha next, be sure to look at Muriwai which i have already done. moza 23:48, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I just discovered that this article really should be named Te Henga (Bethells Beach), and as a cartographer I ask someone to make the appropriate changes, I could do it, but that might create more drama than required. Hopefully it wont be too dramatic as it is, people get funny about naming, ~esp dual naming such as Egmont/Taranaki and Somes/Matiu, I've noticed.moza 10:19, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Name 

message: "but in 1976 the New Zealand Geographic Board changed the name of the beach to from Bethells Beach to Te Henga (Bethells Beach)"
So from Bethells Beach to Te Henga or Te Henga to Bethells Beach?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.74.197.17 (talk) 10:27, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  To From?
Talk:Cairo Tower

message: Can we have a transliteration for this?  Is it "burg al-Qahira"?  Badagnani 23:08, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transliteration 

message: Does this article really need a comparison of the tower's height with that of the Great Pyramid?  Surely a note on factual height should suffice.124.168.239.49 09:57, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height comparison 

message: Uh, I'm pretty sure this building cost more than 3 dollars. The page claims its price was 3 dollars.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.41.204.89 (talk) 00:24, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 dollars? 
Talk:Deniz Baykal

message: == Unverifiable claims ==
I'm going to remove the last paragraph from this article in the near future unless someone provides some links to back up what was written.  Mdozturk (talk) 13:00, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I'm going to remove the last paragraph from this article in the near future unless someone provides some links to back up what was written.  Mdozturk (talk) 13:00, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unverifiable claims 

message: The article states that Baykal became the Republican People Party's General Secrerary [sic] in 1988, but that can't be right because the CHP was only founded anew in 1992. Did Baykal not leave the SHP in 1990 over a conflict with Erdal İnönü?  --Lambiam 21:29, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect information 

message: Information on Baykal promising to swim to Rhodes has been deleted, yet I can't find an explanation here or in the edit summary. Anyone object to its reinsertion?
Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 16:32, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swimming to Rhodes 

message: There is surely a lot more to tell here about his family, career, politics and impact.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.77.156.90 (talk) 11:33, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too Little 
Talk:The New Church/True christianity

message: I cleaned up the article a bit, added some wikilinks, and fact-checked several points (e.g., Calvin burned Servetus — actually the city council did, Calvin was only the prosecutor, and requested death by sword not fire). I also made it clear that the "True Christianity" of this article is asserted by a particular group. » MonkeeSage « 01:29, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay then. Just don't forget the four tilde thing (ie, sign your posts). Arch O. La Grigrory Deepdelver 21:29, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Appealing to the Razor against the doctrine of the Trinity assumes that the facts of the Bible can be explained in a different (simpler) way; but Trinitarians deny that assumption. Anyhow, I had a question about the New Church belief regarding "Hell" — from the wording in the article it doesn't look like they mean a place, but a condition which humanity has created for itself. Is that right? If so, I suggest we add quotes around "Hell" to distinguish it from the meaning used by most Christians (i.e., a place of eternal torment where the unsaved go after death and judgment). » MonkeeSage « 22:20, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I don't think this is the place to get into a full discussion of the doctrine of the Trinity, but to briefly answer your questions; yes, considered in the abstract, Unitarianism is simpler than Trinitarianism, but that doesn't mean much if it is too simple to explain the facts of the Bible, as the Razor only works for two theories that can equally explain the same facts ("don't multiply reasons beyond what is necessary"), and Trinitarians deny that Unitarianism can do that; and Trinitarians don't believe that "being" and "person" are reducible to each other, as rocks have "being" but are not "persons". » MonkeeSage « 22:57, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup, attribution, fact-checking
Talk:Yuli Tamir

message: Can anyone submit/upload a photo please?
:Done, not by me. I removed the missing picture tag and stub tag. gidonb 13:02, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: How the heck does an Education Minister get politically accused of being a "murderer"? (See Mercaz HaRav massacre; that article has the incident I'm talking about.) Isn't an education minister supposed to regulate, well, education? Isn't security the job of someone specializing in security or something? So what's the point of calling an education minister a "murderer"?  —  Rickyrab | Talk 23:19, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Murderer"?

message: Tamir publishes under the name "Yael", which the article says was her given name at birth. Why is she now known as "Yuli"? If that is her nickname or the equivalent, it should not be the title of the article. –  SJL 04:56, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Israeli government lists "Yael" as her proper name, and "Yuli" in brackets, indicating that she goes by with acquiantences. I'm going to change the name of the article to "Yael Tamir", and "Yuli Tamir" will redirect there. –  SJL 05:00, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

text: A google search reveals that even in english "Yuli" is the common name: "Yuli Tamir" gets 32800 ghits, while "Yael Tamir" gets 8200 ("Yael Yuli Tamir" gets 221 ghits). Further more, Tamir's Knesset page lists her as "Yuli Tamir". Rami R 15:34, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough, but can you explain why none of her publications use that name? –  SJL 16:03, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: no. Rami R 20:01, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: That last paragraph implies that Tamir supports (or at least does not support opposition to) clitoridectomy, which is far from the truth. Read her response to her critics:
http://www.bostonreview.net/BR21.5/tamir.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.158.238 (talk) 04:47, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Multiculturalism' 
Talk:Princess Oona

message: Beautiful cave woman? 惑乱 分からん 22:48, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Since the INDUCKS site shows countries not in the list I modified it to say "many countries including...", which I think is preferable to trying to maintain an exhaustive list. Gr8white (talk) 18:54, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Countries
Talk:Alex Wright

message: This section mentions Alex's appearance on Louis Theroux's Weird Weekends, and discusses him saying he was aoppearing on WCW for the first time.
After watching this episode myself, he's actually mentioning debuting a new gimmick, namely Berlyn. He doesn't use that name, instead saying the character is a "bad, mean guy" named Alexander Wright. That element of Weird Weekends was apparently shot in April 1999 (April 19th, to be exact, since it shows the Roddy Piper/Ric Flair mental hospital angle), and Berlyn didn't debut until May.
So were WCW sending people to Nitro 'just in case', with half-formed gimmicks? Elcondor (talk) 08:46, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Other media

message: Hi 
i did ask myself if there should be more about the Promotion of Alex and more of the Students he has any comments? --Nakurio (talk) 21:26, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Students 

message: I have removed the following links as they don't seem reliable (oww), or are dead links:
* OWW Profile
* Interview at Gerweck.net
* The Wrestling Archive Profile
Silverfish (talk) 14:07, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing External Links 
Talk:Paul Roma

message: "The statement was fitting as Powers possessed huge biceps and a chiseled torso, while Roma's physique resembled that of a Greek God, which appealed to WWE agent Pat Patterson." Given Pat Patterson's long-standing rumored homosexuality, this seems like some stealth smark humor.
*This article seems to be a huge magnet for infantile homosexual comments from little kids all over the net. That comment was unfortunately missed when we cleaned up other similar comments - in the future feel free to remove something like this instead of slapping the "Hoax" tag on it, it's not a hoax it's vandalism MPJ-DK 16:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: does anyone know if he is related to professional Bodybuilder Evan Centopani who was born in Bridgeport, CT ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.201.16.121 (talk) 08:25, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Private Life / Family 
Talk:The Complete Peel Sessions 1978–2004

message: So is the Tony Wilson who produced a couple of these sessions this Tony Wilson (of Factory Records and Hacienda fame), or is he some other Tony Wilson? --Spondoolicks 18:21, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tony Wilson
Talk:The Trenchcoat Brigade

message: Merging the character list into the main article.
Merge The article itself is a stub. It may grow beyond that, but the list is at its max, 5 characters. Such a size is easily incorperated into the article and does not need to be split off. — J Greb 07:37, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discuss 

message: Removed following section:
:This joke itself may also draw its origins from an earlier joke found in a single panel within issue #71 of the Sandman. In that panel, John Constantine, Dr. Occult and the Phantom Stranger all encounter each other at a wake. Constantine remarks sarcastically to Occult "Nice trench coat" to which Occult replies with a curt "Thanks". 
Issue #71 of Sandman was released in Sept 1995 and The Books of Magic was first published in 1990/1991: the "Nice trenchcoat" line is a separate joke alluding to the original "Charge of the Trenchcoat Brigade" joke from TBoM and so not particularly relevant here. JonStrines (talk) 10:55, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Nice Trenchcoat"

message: I just removed the following remarks from the *Members* section, as they appear to refer to the members table in a previous form, and are either unnecessary or no longer accurate.
I propose that the table be replaced with a simple bullet-point list of the members, with links to their individual articles. I don't really see why the specific fields "Real Name", "First Joined Team", and "First Appearance" are particularly significant for this group. Especially since the "First joined Team" column is the same for all members except Rose, in whose case it is debatable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tsmackinlay (talk • contribs) 22:07, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup of Members Section
Talk:Mister E

message: There should be a reference to Marc Oliver "Mr. E" Everett, the Mastermind of The Eels.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.115.162.156 (talk) 15:12, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Diol

message: So is "glycol" simply a remnant of an older nomenclature, or is it still approved for some uses?  What's the etymology?  (The name suggests some connection with sugar or sweetness to me.)  121a0012 (talk) 04:25, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I see OED2 claims "[f. GLYC(ERINE) + -OL; the original intention of the name being to designate a substance intermediate in composition between ‘glycerine’ and ‘alcohol’.]"  121a0012 (talk) 04:26, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomenclature history 

message: Here it is said that: "In a vicinal diol, the two hydroxyl groups occupy vicinal positions, that is, they are attached to adjacent atoms. These compounds are called glycols." But according to IUPAC Gold Book 'glycols' are "Dihydric alcohols, also known as diols, in which the two hydroxy groups are on different carbon atoms, usually but not necessarily adjacent." So the adjacency is not a requirement and this statement should be changed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.40.12.10 (talk) 13:36, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glycol definition 

message: Is there a specific nomenclature for 1,2 diols in which one carbon is not in a ring or double bond, such that one OH is free to rotate so there is no strict CIS or TRANS? Example: C1 and C2 of fructose. Chemistry I am working with requires this conformation. Writing just "1,2-diol" is not specific enough.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.238.177.173 (talk) 16:47, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  differentiating non-cis and non-trans diols from cis and trans 

message: ? 37.35.67.20 (talk) 19:05, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diolet dhe formula e tyre 

message: https://www.eurasiareview.com/14052022-algae-reveal-clues-about-climate-changes-over-millions-of-years/ ; https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4147/2018/ 2600:6C67:1C00:5F7E:1446:5765:67CB:7EFE (talk) 02:35, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use in paleoclimate studies 

message: — Assignment last updated by UBC24 AT (talk) 04:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Something that I want to improve is clarifying and give more details to the names of the diols. I want to give more attention to cis and trans diols and how to create trans-diol and cis-diol. I want to add some pictures of germinal diols. Finally, I want to add why diols are important and why it is used in chemistry as a section. AFakeDrummer (talk) 06:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 300