Template talk:WikiProject Philosophy

message: The tone of this banner is just plain wrong. See my comments at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philosophy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Banno (talk • contribs)  08:14, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Could someone who knows how to write the script add a "List" category please?  Also, the categorizing doesn't seem to be working perfectly (articles marked 'stub' end up in the 'unassessed' category, for example).  Thanks! KSchutte 23:20, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: there's a thousand-year discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Index to see wheter the editorial team will add an equation exclusive for list pages.--Andersmusician VOTE 00:35, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Is now a wanted category with 634 members. -- Prove It (talk) 15:49, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like an error on one of the templates to me. Banno 03:33, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I fixed it. However, it would be good if someone else looked at the code. You can test all the options on it at this test page. Those are all now in :Category:Unassessed Philosophy articles. Greg Bard 23:49, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:-Class philosophy articles

message: Request this template renamed "WikiProject Philosophy", (1) to follow similar "Template:WikiProject X" templates, (2) so current "Template:Philosophy navgiation" may be renamed "Template:Philosophy". Sardanaphalus (talk) 10:30, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this a good idea? currently I have to type {{philosophy.... Am I going to have to type the whole thing now?? Won't a redirect suffice? What is easier on the server? Be well. Pontiff Greg Bard (talk) 14:29, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: * I don't think you'd need to type "{{WikiProject Philosophy..." as a shortcut could be set up, e.g. how about "{{WPPhil...."Sardanaphalus (talk) 21:08, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The vast vast majority of the 8000 or so articles refer to {{philosophy.... Won't the current redirect suffice? Don't much feel like changing up terms at this point. It could result in more work later.Pontiff Greg Bard (talk) 21:12, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

text: * I guess the current redirect suffices, but why not sort out the name now rather than later, with the help of a bot or bots, so there isn't more to do later? Sardanaphalus (talk) 04:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move (2008)

message: Please add C-Class support for this template. To do this, simply check wherever the template refers to B-class and add a reference to C-class after it. Muchas gracias, the skomorokh 21:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems all done now - Peripitus (Talk) 11:54, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Category:C-Class Anarchism articles is empty, even though I tagged an article for anarchism and C-class on September 15th. Although it works for C-Class Philosophy articles, the template still does not recognize C-Class task force (e.g. Analytic philosophy, Philosophical literature) articles. the skomorokh 14:36, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Ah, I see. Thanks for the help. the skomorokh 16:28, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  C-class support 

message: I'm wondering why Portal talk:Anarchism is categorised in  but . Can someone fix the template such that non-article task force pages can be tagged as such and do not appear in the Unassessed categories? Gracias, Skomorokh 12:41, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be in Portal-Class for both. If/when the banner is converted, this would be fixed. Martin 16:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, thanks. Skomorokh 17:03, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Task force non-articles 

message: Could template be changed to use  & new QUALITY_SCALE settings as per the edits in the sandbox. Thanks -- WOSlinker (talk) 23:18, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Please update the documentation if necessary. Cheers,  Skomorokh  23:21, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Req 

message: Could all the instances of  be changed to ? This will accommodate the book-class per WT:PHILO#Book-class. Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 01:28, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: . Thanks,  PeterSymonds (talk) 01:32, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book-class 

message: I would like to propose the addition of a few other schools of thought to the Schools of thought>Contemporary>Other category. Namely, Deep ecology and Epistemological anarchism. Both of these are movements that have been important in philosophy (undoubtedly more so than the obscure Russian cosmism, for instance) and aren't easily classifiable as either analytic or Continental. Thanks. Oscar666kta420swag (talk) 09:41, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other contemporary schools of thought