lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Frank O'Connor (director)

message: There is another actor Frank O'Connor on Wikipedia whose page has been named using natural disambiguation via a still-used but also-still-less common name in order to avoid clashing with this actor Frank O'Connor. However, it dawns on me that the O'Connor on this page was also a director. Would it be reasonable to parenthetically disambiguate this page as "Frank O'Connor (director)" so that the other page can be disambiguated to "Frank O'Connor (actor)"?
Potential downside: any piped wikilinks to this page on Wikipedia right now are for "Frank O'Connor (actor)", so moving this page to "Frank O'Connor (director)" and the other page to "Frank O'Connor (actor)" could cause piping problems. I don't know how extensive a problem that would be or what would make it surmountable, so I figured I would ask here in the hopes of avoiding such a problem in case anyone else interesting in this page would be able to help with that. Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits) 06:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: After a year, I've decided to try going forward with this so as to bring Charles Francis O'Connor in line with WP:MIDDLE (as the other actor O'Connor was not widely known as Charles or Francie, making the full name as an article title an unnatural disambiguation). Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits) 23:06, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Frank O'Connor (director)? 
Talk:Bloody Monday

message: Some one complained of the lack of footnotes.  I went to the sources and added the appropriate references. Rjensen (talk) 22:45, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: The coordinates given are for the historical marker about the riot.  It is also the site of Quinn’s Row, one of the most intense areas of the riot.  The events took place in various locations, but this is probably the most representative of where the worst of the riot was.  GeorgeofOrange (talk) 02:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates
Talk:Draconomicon

message: i think the first paragraph seems misleading. even though the current book does have these attributes it does not mean the article should look like an advertisement for the product whilst it is still in publication. i think it would be better to remove the bias and have an introductory paragraph about what the purpose of Draconomicons are then discuss the individual books in chronological order leading up to the newest version. that will prevent any new edition book from needing to replace the current first paragraph and having it moved to the "older books" section as then any new book would just be added to the end of the list of book who share this name to show if/how they have changed. shadzar|Talk|contribs 18:46, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  chronology
Talk:Jim Wiemer

message: What is the reason that it says he did not get a ring because he didn't play in half the regular season games or a finals game?  That is irrelevant.  Those are only the requirements to have a name engraved.  Players who don't qualify can still get rings, and generally do if they are with the team at the time their team wins the Stanley Cup.  108.0.244.168 (talk) 06:48, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stanley Cup ring
Talk:Gökdeniz Karadeniz

message: == After the Confederations Cup Karadeniz was followed by Ajax but on both occasions there was no agreement. ==
I can't even guess what that sentence means.  Anyone know? - Richfife 21:25, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess he wants to mean, "After Confederations Cup, Ajax try to sign a contract with Gökdeniz, but they failed or Gökdeniz or the club doesn't want to sign" :) anyway this sentence is not so important and also it is not cited. Whole article must be re-written. --Ugur Basak 21:32, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: I can't even guess what that sentence means.  Anyone know? - Richfife 21:25, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess he wants to mean, "After Confederations Cup, Ajax try to sign a contract with Gökdeniz, but they failed or Gökdeniz or the club doesn't want to sign" :) anyway this sentence is not so important and also it is not cited. Whole article must be re-written. --Ugur Basak 21:32, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  After the Confederations Cup Karadeniz was followed by Ajax but on both occasions there was no agreement. 
Talk:Naram-Sin of Akkad

message: Naram-Sin = Nimrod ???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.235.26.150 (talk) 14:28, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

message: If the stele is anything to go by, Naram-Sin was a giant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.225.65.89 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 23 June 2006
:It's called hierarchic proportion. Learning is fun! --Atlantima 02:42, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He was indeed a giant. There were also other famous giants besides him. Read the Zohar or the Talmud (original versions in Aramaic and Jewish Babylonian Aramaic), it's all in there.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.153.221.249 (talk) 08:53, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This site at the Louvre-(), states the Victory Stele of Naram-Suen is made of pink limestone.  (from the HotSonoran desertArizonaUSA), Mmcannis (talk) 05:57, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Victory Stele

message: Could he be Dhul-Qarnayn mentioned in the Holy Quraan?
Aseel Mulla (talk) 15:26, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dhul-Qarnayn? 

message: Too tired at the moment but I'm going to be adding a section on his assumption of divinity at some point as I feel it's needed - specifically it occurs in the context of his crushing of the 'great revolt' of the sumerian city states in one of the earlier years of his reign. There's also an precedent in one of the kings involved in the Lagash-Umma border conflict who was reportedly 'moulded by ningirsu in his mother's womb' - do people think that belongs here to establish context/precedent for his action, or is that better off on that king's page? (can't remember off top of head, will look up later) VeritasVox (talk) 03:42, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Divinity
Talk:Internet child modeling

message: The Risks section is full of original research. Look at:
*Child modeling photos could be used to groom other children for abuse.
*Photos of child models could encourage pedophiles to seek out the child models themselves, stalk them, and sexually assault them.
and no references anywhere.  Skinnyweed 21:41, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  OR tag
Talk:Fray

message: before the histories get any more complicated, rather than waiting for the conclusion of the move request discussion. And FWIW, I think The Fray should remain the disambig page for the two uses.  24.18.215.132 00:26, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[User:Teemu08]]'s cut&paste page move should be reverted immediately

message: Is "fray" meaning "friar" (which I have not met except in the Brazilian brand Fray Bentos) actually an English word, or simply one used in Spanish and Portuguese?  If the latter, it does not belong in the English wikipedia.  86.144.98.187 (talk) 16:23, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Fray
Talk:Arizona Strip

message: Unfortunately, this article was not well researched, and many of its assertions are plainly wrong.  For instance, the idea that the Arizona strip was not settled by Europeans until the 20th century is absurd.  For instance, the town of Fredonia, which the article mentions, was founded in the 1880's.  In addition, Jacob Hamblin and numerous other Mormon pioneers had ranches and both in the lowlands, such as House Rock Valley, and on the Kaibab Platueau, then known as the Buckskin Mountain, dating from the mid-19th century. Though it was certainly sparsely settled, and remains so today, it's European settlement dates back at least 140 years
Can anyone explain why this area was not assigned to Utah?Pbrower2a (talk) 21:55, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Untitled) 
Talk:Zoom Lens Reflex

message: Should this article exist? There are currently no reflex design (ie. mirror based) cameras with a fixed lens. Or at least, if there are, they are very uncommon and hence an example should be given. Also, a google search shows up no examples of anyone referring to any camera as "Zoom-lens reflex". If there is anyone, again, an example should be given.
:I agree. According to the article, this type of camera does not exist. Unless it's been theorised or discussed by someone important in such fields, what's the point of this article? boffy_b 23:45, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I understand, Zoom-lens reflex cameras usually refer to digital cameras with zoom lenses and a electronic viewfinder.  While it's not technically accurate, it is in common use, similar to how, in firearms, "bullet" is often substituted for "cartridge".  Perhaps we should add to what it commonly refers?  It's hardly the first time a somewhat popular term is a misnomer.Attakmint 21:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
File talk:Eloquence and Danny.jpg

message: User Michael Snow upload this image from my set in Flickr. I left copyright status by default, and never changed it. But I only want attribution licence. For this image at English Wikipedia, I grant GFDL. --Zuirdj 21:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Then fair use is disputed.  I've put up the fairusedispute template instead. Hbdragon88 20:45, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous licence
Talk:Siva Vaidhyanathan

message: how are the sports teams he's a fan of at all relevant?  This bio sounds like a book jacket copy/paste (not to say that it is, it just sounds like it) --jacobolus (t) 19:14, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's not. I removed them. --MichaelZimmer (talk) 19:21, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: as a person whose read a good deal about the personality of other academics, I can say that sometimes it is interesting to hear what sports teams they are a fan of, especially if they are a real fanatic.  --Buridan 23:16, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless such minutiae somehow impacts their scholarship, I see little value in noting it. There's a slope here, and I, for one, don't want to slide down it. --MichaelZimmer (talk) 23:45, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  sports teams
Talk:The Liberties, Dublin

message: Who on earth proposed to merge The Liberties into Georgian Dublin??? They are totally difficult parts of the city in totally different locations. It would about as pointless and factually wrong as to merge articles on Cork and Kerry, England and Wales or Canada and the United States. Georgian Dublin concerns the 18th and 19th  century city that developed around 5 squares: Ruthland, Mountjoy, Merrion and Fitzwilliam Squares, with St Stephen's Green. The Liberties is a mediaeval part of the city miles away that has nothing to do with Georgian Dublin. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 22:07, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006 post

message: Much of the text is a copyright violation of the Dublinks page (linked). The value of this link itself is questionable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.152.90.57 (talk • contribs)  August 5, 2007
::The whole article has since been completely re-written. Hohenloh  +   23:35, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation
Talk:List of Mario antagonists

message: I took off the appearances section and the quotes section, and added an image section and a notes section. I may bring back the appearances section, but how do you think this is?
Name  	Image	Description                                                                                  	Notes
Goomba	     	Goombas resemble mushrooms with feet and eyes. They have brown heads, and light brown bodies.	Goombas are typically killed by jumping on their heads. Some variants of the Goomba include the Microgoomba and the Paragoomba.
—Captain538[talk] 20:51, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: My proposal for a table setup...

message: I don't think this article should have so many abbreviations. If anyone agrees with me, I'll change them all to the full game names. --The Great Llama (now on editor review!) 17:57, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, if you could do a find/replace to take out all the abbreviations, it'd make the page look a lot better --Jimbob1630 20:03, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I've started to do so. I've also removed remakes since they obviously have the same villains as the original games. —The Great Llamamoo? 21:01, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Abbreviations?

message: As said before, most of the quotes were made up. I know things that some enemies actually say, may I add them? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.185.18.21 (talk) 00:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I've never heard of the majority of the quotes. Feel free to add your own, as long as they are relevant. –The Great Llamamoo? 01:42, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotes
Talk:Figrin D'an and the Modal Nodes

message: What? I don't remember any of this in the movies...—Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.160.101.148 (talk • contribs) 
:Me Neither. Wikipedia where do you get your information? Did George Lucas tell you personally.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.3.107.212 (talk • contribs) 
:: Well, lots of times you get Star Wars information from the licensed book series. In this case, I guess the information is coming from a short story compilation by Karen Traviss. But lots of Star Wars fans know information in what is referred to as the expanded universe Gautam  07:19, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Precisely.  There is more to Star Wars than just the films. Prometheus-X303- 14:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: @Rosguill thanks for your notability tag. This article was merged in October 2018 into Mos Eisley 1 month after proposal with no objections. The article has since been restored with no discussion, but as you rightly point out, it is non-notable and has no merit as a standalone article on Wikipeida. I suggest reverting to a redirect. 23:24, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody has objected to this after 2 weeks, and the article has been reverted to a redirect.Cnbrb (talk) 13:23, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notablity
Talk:Taytay, Rizal

message: Harris Memorial College --Jeanoah (talk) 09:18, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Private School / colleges 

message: Kung mapapansin nyo po na ang trapiko sa Ejercito Avenue ay lagi nalang nariyan dahil na rin siguro sa tagal ng stoplight jan sa may barkadahan bridge sana naman po ay mapansin nyo ito at sana maiayos na ang trapiko dito sa taytay salamat 112.210.226.91 (talk) 13:21, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's about traffic not disappearing near Barkadahan Bridge
Talk:Georgian Dublin

message: Who on earth proposed to merge The Liberties into Georgian Dublin??? They are totally difficult parts of the city in totally different locations. It would about as pointless and factually wrong as to merge articles on Cork and Kerry, England and Wales, or Canada and the United States. Georgian Dublin concerns the 18th and 19th  century city that developed around 5 squares: Ruthland, Mountjoy, Merrion and Fitzwilliam Squares, with St Stephen's Green. The Liberties is a mediaeval part of the city miles away that has nothing to do with Georgian Dublin. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 22:07, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I assume this was mostly written by one person? It's full of interesting factoids, and is well written, but the tone is far too conversational throughout.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.45.54.228 (talk) 14:25, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conversational Tone 

message: Hi all, 
Here is my addition I would like to make, what do you think?: 
In the 18th century, the iconic areas with Georgian houses were located in Merrion Square, St. Stephen's Green and Fitzwilliam Square. The Little Museum of Dublin, established in 2011, sits across from St. Stephen's Green and is housed in a sublime Georgian house, in which you can join a tour and revel in the beautifully protected architecture White, Trevor, et al. Little Book of Dublin. The Little Museum of Dublin. 2017. Print .
Thank you in advance  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Léa Di Francesco (talk • contribs) 11:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Object This is spam by an editor with a Conflict of Interest. The Banner talk 14:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Little Museum of Dublin
Talk:Spare the Air program

message: I can't find any criteria for deciding when a gov't program is non-notable; "spare the air" gets over 100K hits on google; however it seems that some of the hits refer to programs in other parts of the US. Perhaps the article should be generalized to include all such programs. I created it because I couldn't find a mention of "spare the air" on wikipedia when I wanted to know what it was, and thus it seemed that an article on the subject might be useful to other people. Pretzelpaws 22:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

message: "give these people air!!" lol  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.0.68.250 (talk) 04:36, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  anyone remember 
Talk:Korean profanity

message: This article previously contained  a magnificent list of Korean swearwords. However, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so it is not appropriate here. However, these word entries would fit perfectly in Wiktionary, please feel free to move them there. 
You might want to look at the Latin profanity article to see what can be done to treat profanity in an encyclopedic way without using massive wordlists.
-- The Anome 23:26, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The quality of the list was very low as well. Again, WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so please don't reinstate the list, people. --Kjoonlee 04:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving the wordlist to Wiktionary 

message: Examples, please? --Candy-Panda 04:24, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since Wikipedia is not a language guide or dictionary, we would have to add descriptions or analysis from reliable sources. Nobody has found any yet, so we can't add examples. --Kjoonlee 22:04, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples?
Talk:Sound power level

message: This article is in good shape so far as the basic physics is concerned but it was without good references so I have added two references from two very notable physics departments to support this article via the Wiki verifiable references standard.  I included both references because there is a difference between sound power and sound intensity and the Wiki readers should be aware of that (this article itself however does not confuse the two - it does a great job :) I have also added an additional external link which is an interesting study published by the Journal of the Acoustical Society of America on this very subject. Cheers, Astrobayes 22:43, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent! — Omegatron 04:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References Added 

message: As the article starts out mentioning, SPL means Sound Pressure Level, whereas Sound Power Level is abbreviated SWL. So correct me if I'm wrong, but when speaker manufacturers mention 93 dB SPL 1W/1m, are they not referring to Sound Pressure Level? In that case, this section should be in the Sound pressure article (which details SPL), instead of this.130.227.121.251 (talk) 19:44, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  SPL vs. SWL 

message: It seems the formula connecting SPL and SWL has the wrong sign.
I changed it right away, but since it is such an important and yet hard to notice change, I'll just post it here for review. I changed:
\mathit{SPL} = \mathit{SWL}+10\, \log_{10}\left(\frac{4\pi r^2}{S_0}\right)
to:
\mathit{SPL} = \mathit{SWL}-10\, \log_{10}\left(\frac{4\pi r^2}{S_0}\right)
It seems clear that SPL should decrease with increasing distance to the sound source. 130.227.121.251 (talk) 19:49, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in formula 

message: This link calculates SPL of .001 W at 1 m; the result is 78.99 dB. The table shows 90 dB. (Larger input values are not accepted by Wolframalpha, as they are considered out of range.) --Onerock (talk) 02:54, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wolframalpha calculates values 11 dB lower than values in the table
Talk:Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor

message: :: See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post-SSRI sexual dysfunction  ψ  Result: Redirect to Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor#Sexual_dysfunction 
:: Listed at Proposed mergers
I propose merging Post-SSRI sexual dysfunction into Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. This idea has already been floated at WT:MED. The principal reason for the merger is that PSSD is purported to be a medical diagnosis. I don't think publishing a limited number of primary studies is sufficient to establish a diagnosis, no matter how many reviews are published thereafter, especially if the conclusions are summarily rejected by field experts. Rather, a reasonable standard for inclusion would be if the condition is (A) a recognized medical diagnosis OR (B) a widely disseminated fringe/alternative diagnosis, this is clearly neither. The "endorsement" by the EMA does not count towards A, because it is based on a misunderstanding of the limited authority of a medical products agency.
I suggest a limited merger, and it has to be a limited merger with respect to DUE in order to not unbalance the target. Lets keep the historical context, the statement by the EMA and decision concerning the labels, and most importantly be very careful in describing to what extent knowledge about the condition is frought with uncertainty.  I'm aware there's already plenty here at the intended target. Essentially this merger is not about adding more, but rather establishing formal consensus for converting PSSD into a redirect for the time being and undertaking a clean up here. Draken Bowser (talk) 11:35, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Noting also that there has been WP:ADVOCACY and SPA editing fed by at least two internet fora noted at the WT:MED discussion and on Talk:Post-SSRI sexual dysfunction (some of those posts have been removed from the internet fora, but I have kept archive.org copies). SandyGeorgia (Talk)  12:47, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

text: The European Medicines Agency was seriously misconstrued and misrepresented in earlier versions of the PSSD article (which also included SYNTH and non-WP:MEDRS sourcing), and there are reviews that indicate PSSD is not yet defined as a thing separate from the sexual dysfunction already reported for SSRIs, for which there is already a section here at Sexual dysfunction.   The article has been heavily edited since late 2022 by at least eight SPAs coming from internet fora, and should go back to the redirect it was before that, until/unless anything about PSSD as a separate condition is established (cause, treatment, diagnosis, prevalence, etc). SandyGeorgia (Talk)  13:02, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Watching Fuckin' TV All Time Makes a Fool

message: I googled for "Watching Fuckin' TV All Time Makes a Fool" and got zero hits. No mention in the official website either. Is this even gramatically correct? Where does the "Fuckin'" adjective in the title come from? Isn't this work released under a Japanese title only?—Tokek 02:44, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The image has the English "Watching fuckin' TV all time makes a fool" and "Fantastic Erotic Short Pieces" on it though I can't say if either are supposed to be the title or are just aesthetic.  freshofftheufoΓΛĿЌ  09:33, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, I missed that the first time. Well at least now I know where it comes from.—Tokek 10:40, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I just titled it based on the (very grammatically bad) English title that's hidden on the cover as I figured that's the most official English title. The scanlation I read translated it as "Watching TV All The Time Makes You Stupid" though, which is really a much cleaner translation of the Japanese title.--SeizureDog 19:27, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Watching Fuckin' TV All Time Makes a Fool 