lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Narendra Modi Stadium

message: What is the real capacity of the arena, some source claim its 135000, others 130000, an editor added 110000 in infobox ground. Figure should be consistent. Tesla car owner (talk) 14:18, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Try Help:Reference desk Doug Weller talk 15:11, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

text: @Tesla car owner The permanent capacity is 110000 and can be extended to 135000 if needed with seating arrangements in ground for some special event. For its primary purpose of cricket is 110000. For example 110000 is the strength for matches and for events like Namaste Trump it was extended to 135000. This is where this confusion aroused. ShaanSenguptaTalk 15:35, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capacity  

message: Melbourne Cricket Ground have a ground's map and logo in infobox and infobox ground respectively. I don't know how to create it, but if anyone have expertise in it, should create it for this arena. Tesla car owner (talk) 08:42, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the specifics of the request and the location to the requested map template. Transpoman (talk) 12:48, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map and logo needed  

message: Hi, I want to have your opinion on this stadium's name. In 2015 GCA scrapped old Saradar Patel stadium, it no longer exists. In 2020 they inaugurated the new stadium and named it Narendra Modi Stadium (NMS). So the new arena was never named as "Saradar Patel stadium" (SPS). It'll be ok, if I removed word "it was renamed NMS" to 'it was named NMS.' Tesla car owner (talk) 08:07, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems ok. Doug Weller talk 06:51, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: This and other 2023 Cricket World Cup related articles should be protected from IP attcks. Vijay I want you also req for this. I saw these IP r from papi'tan, they'll definately distup Ind articles. Tesla car owner (talk) 11:08, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Tesla car owner I agree. Vijaydanny (talk) 12:34, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @VijaydannyTesla car owner turns out to be a sockpuppet. Doug Weller talk 14:00, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Doug Weller sad to hear that he was doing a decent job here. Vijaydanny (talk) 15:25, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected (P) 

message: Little of the old Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Stadium remains. The pages of the two stadiums should be separated, like with Wembley. SundførTannhauser (talk) 21:46, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate page for Narendra Modi Stadium
Talk:2-Phenylphenol

message: I've read that 2-phenylphenol is a carcinogen but this study seems strange as way less rats got cancer at the highest dose, compared to a lower dose. Icek 13:22, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's have some follow-up on this. Badagnani (talk) 19:38, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carcinogen 

message: In the article the statement "It is a fungicide used for waxing citrus fruits." is erroneous or misleading. While it is true that at one time the Sodium salt of 2-phenylphenol (referred to as SOPP in the trade) was a component of some citrus waxes used in the US, the only significantly sucessful formulation (Britex 561F, EPA reg No. 5202-1) was voluntary deleted by the manufacturer in 1989. Even then it contained less than 1.5% SOPP. At no time was it used as a citrus wax.
The reason for the deletion was apparently economic in that the annual registration fees were becoming very high and other more effective fungicides were becoming available. Annother product manufactured by a much larger company remained on the books until 2003 due to the fact that companies with large numbers of products mearly paid a maxmum fee to the EPA and there was no additional charge for excess registrations. When the registration was transferred to a smaller company, they subsequently canceled it. (Some additional information may be found in Twentieth Century Developments in Hall, David J. 2003. Handling Florida's Fresh Citrus - An Overview. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 116:369-374.
An excellent reference on this, and related subjects, is the book Fresh Citrus Fruits, Second edition. (Eds Wardowski, Miller, Hall and Grierson). Chapters 13, 15 and 18 in particular.
As to non-US uses of 2-phenylphenol in citrus wax, I was not able to find any significant commercial products in the major citrus growing areas of the world. Of course, not finding something does not mean it does not exist. I would welcome any information on this.--Fruitwax (talk) 16:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading Statement
Talk:James Wilson (businessman)

message: During the economic crisis of 1837, he lost most of his wealth when the price of indigo fell. By 1839 he sold most of his property and avoided bankruptcy. However, in 1853 he founded The Chartered Bank of India, Australia and China, which later merged with the Standard Bank to form Standard Chartered Bank in 1969.[citation needed]
Question: how does someone who lost most of his wealth and sold most of his property to avoid bankruptcy go on to found a bank? Something happened in between, someone lent him the money to start that bank. MrSativa (talk) 03:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: A Question Of Information
Talk:James Withycombe

message: I have removed this:
:Oregon's first State Highway Commission was created in 1913, during the governorship of Oswald West, NOT during Withycombe's administration. In February of 1913 good roads enthusiast Sam Hill brought the entire Oregon state legislature – at his own expense - to Maryhill, his country estate on the Columbia River, to view several miles of modern hard-surfaced road. Visitors enjoyed a sumptuous luncheon and listened to Hill’s lecture on road building. Afterward, they moved to create the Oregon State Highway Commission with Governor Oswald West as chairman.
First it is unsourced and unencyclopedic, but also needs clarification and integration with the rest of the article. Aboutmovies 07:26, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highway info 
Talk:Signature (logic)

message: The name of the article Signature (in mathematical logic) is not too good, it should be “Signature (mathematical logic)”. But this latter name redirects to Signature (universal algebra).
Maybe merging, renaming, redirecting can be thought of.
Physis 11:33, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For now I moved (using the admin tools) signature (in mathematical logic)  to signature (mathematical logic). I can't say if some merge with  signature (universal algebra) should take place as I am not an expert. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:59, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It makes no sense to keep signature (mathematical logic) and signature (universal algebra) separate, as it is a very simple basic concept which is common to both areas. One special point in universal algebra is that usually (not always) relations are not allowed in a signature. In many contexts in model theory, on the other hand, arguments can be simplified by assuming (w.l.o.g. for these contexts) that signatures contain only relations. Also in model theory people use formulations like "language" or "non-logical symbols of the language" when they are really referring to a signature. --Hans Adler 20:57, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging and/or renaming 

message: I couldn't find a definition of sorts in Wikipedia. Is it just any enumerable set? An alphabet? Is it defined by the role its playing? Is it part of category theory? -- Bartosz 20:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorts are a simple and very fundamental concept of model theory (and universal algebra) which, for historical reasons, is almost never explained in introductory texts. They are similar to types in a programming language. For example, one way of describing a vector space (although for many purposes not a good one) is as a two-sorted structure, with one sort for the field of scalars and one sort for the vectors. In a many-sorted setting, the arity of a symbol contains additional information. For example, it's not enough to know that scalar multiplication is a binary function. It's a function from scalars \times vectors to vectors. And there are two addition symbols, one for the scalars and one for the vectors. It should be clear from this explanation that an arbitrary set will do as a set of sorts. It's only used to index things. It can be finite or infinite of arbitrary cardinality. To avoid stupid special cases we may want to require that it's non-empty, however. --Hans Adler 21:09, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are sorts? 

message: The sentence  which is found in the lead is not sourced and not discussed in the body of the article. A type signature in computer science applies to a single function and describes its arguments. A signature in logic applies to a formal language and describes the symbols that it uses. There is some vague similarity between these two concepts (besides both having the name "signature"), but not enough to warrant this sentence.  Dominic Mayers (talk) 02:14, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type signature in computer science versus signature in logic
Talk:Takht Sri Damdama Sahib

message: The article lacks it. if there is indeed a meaning. Etymology section can be added--DBigXray 12:46, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of Damdama 

message: एक मुस्लिम भाईचारे को तोड़ने की कोशिश कर रहे हैं वह एक बार इतिहास भी देख ले कि किस प्रकार सिख गुरुओं का स्नेहा मुस्लिमों के प्रति है गुरु नानक देव जी के साथी भाई मरदाना जी एक मुस्लिम परिवार से थे श्री हरमंदिर साहिब से नीव एक मुस्लिम संत साईं मियां मीर जी ने रखी थी  1704 ई में जब गुरु गोबिंद सिंह जी महाराज के दोनों छोटे साहिबजादे जोरावर सिंह और फ़तेह सिंह को सरहिंद के सूबेदार वज़ीर खां की कचहरी में जब जिन्दा दिवार में चुनकर सजा ए मौत का फरमान सुनाया तो उस कचहरी में मलेर कोटला नवाब शेर मुहम्मद खां भी मौजूद थे। उन्होंने इस पाप के खिलाफ आवाज़ उठाई और सूबेदार के इस फैसले का डट कर विरोध किया। नवाब साहब को याद दिलाया गया कि कैसे सिक्खों के साथ जंग में उनका सगा भाई मारा गया । नवाब साहब ने कहा कि जंग दो सेनाओं में होती है। जब सैनिक आमने सामने होते हैं तो दोनों तरफ से लोग मरते हैं, उसमे इन मासूम बच्चों का क्या कसूर। हां, मैं जंग का बदला जंग में लूंगा, इन नन्हें बच्चों को मार कर नही। ये इस्लाम के खिलाफ है। फिर भी सूबेदार सरहिंद वज़ीर खां नही माना। उसने गुरु गोबिंद सिंह के दोनों पुत्रों की सजा बरकरार रखी। यह देख सुन कर नवाब साहब " हा दा नारा" यानी हक़ की आवाज़ बोल कर वहां से बाहर चले गए। ये हा दा नारा सिख कौम के लिए एक अमर नारा बन गया नवाब जी की याद में आज भी मलेर कोटला नवाब शेर मुहम्मद खान की यादगार और हा के नारे को अमर बनाने के लिए सिख क़ौम ने शहीदी स्थान गुरुद्वारा फतेहगढ़ साहिब का मुख्य द्वार शेर मुहम्मद खान के नाम पर है जो सिख मुस्लिम भाईचारे की अद्भुत मिसाल है। महाराजा रंजीत सिंह की सेना में कई योद्धा मुस्लिम थे बताया जाता है कि जब 1984 में सिख विरोधी दंगे हुए थे उस समय  हरियाणा हिमाचल प्रदेश के जिन इलाकों में मुस्लिम जनसंख्या अधिक थी इलाकों में मुस्लिम भाइयों ने सिखों को दंगाइयों की भीड़ से बचाया था सिख मुस्लिम भाईचारा जिंदाबाद Guru Prit Singh Garewal (talk) 12:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  सिख मुस्लिम एकता
Talk:James Yorke Scarlett

message: https://archive.org/stream/p2alumnicantabri05univuoft#page/432/mode/2up Trappedinburnley (talk) 14:54, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  poss source 
Talk:Takht Sri Patna Sahib

message: This gurdwara is one of the five Takhts of the Sikh faith. Sikhism and Hinduism are two completely different and separate religions.
The post says- religious affirmation: Hinduism.
This is incorrect. I am unable to edit or change it, can somebody please change it and stop the spread of wrong information to the world. Randhawa252 (talk) 21:57, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religious affiliation- hinduism
Talk:James Z. George

message: This article says he died in Mississippi City, MS... But I know he's buried in North Carrollton.  Does anybody know why his body was moved or why he is even buried there?  --nezZario (talk) 03:36, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death & Burial Place 
Talk:Tawa Reservoir

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:40, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Template talk:Forts in India

message: Would it be alright to fork off a Similiar one for Forts in Maharashtra? -Mayuresh 18:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to do so. You will need to copy the content to Template:Forts in Maharashtra. Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 06:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Now there is a new template - Template:MarathaEmpire - have a look. Does it serve the purpose? - P.K.Niyogi (talk) 22:57, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Forts in Maharashtra?

message: I feel that this template is getting too big and might not be useful for navigation. Should the contents be further divided (for e.g. by state)? --Belasd (talk) 20:18, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I modified this one to group them by dynasty of builders or major occupiers as this would be more informative. I also made an alternative  grouping based on state which can be seen here. I did not use it because several states like Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Rajasthan ,Karnataka have their own navigation templates which means that statewise grouping in this template would have made them redundant.  -- Belasd (talk) 03:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too bulky? 

message: This template classifies the forts inconsistently - some of them by the dynasty, some of them by the kingdom (which may have been ruled by multiple dynasties as is the case with the Vijayanagara empire), some of them by social group (e.g. Jat/Rajput) etc. In addition to the inconsistency, this classification is not very helpful as a fort may have been controlled by multiple dynasties / kingdoms. Classifying by the dynasty that established the fort would not be fruitful, as the date of establishment of several forts is uncertain. This list would be better organized by location (e.g. state / territory). utcursch | talk 18:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization
Talk:Vijaya Stambha

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 

message: Victory pillar chittorgarh short note 43.247.156.185 (talk) 15:30, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social 6th std
Talk:Vivekanandar Illam

message: Should we Include information about chennai related aspects of Ice trade ( http://chennai.metblogs.com/2006/07/09/ice-house-chennai-and-the-ice-trade-its-history/ )? The article on Icecream does not seem to be a right fit.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bnitin (talk • contribs) 02:49, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ice Trade
Talk:Wankhede Stadium

message: The capacity is actually 45,000 not 33,000 according to ESPN cricinfo
86.44.156.187 (talk) 15:19, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Check the links from the latest articles on the ground page, 3 of the 5 which mention capacity all state 33,000 to 33,500--sss333 (talk) 22:48, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Capacity

message: And how is it pronounced? 121.217.202.194 (talk) 00:33, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: From the current commentary of the NZ-Can game, Wan-key-dee. Lugnuts (talk) 10:31, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: pronounced

message: please someone remove the quote undernaeth pic of entrance Very OLD entrance' is amateur  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.149.112.228 (talk) 08:14, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  removal of pic 
Talk:Jan Smuts in the South African Republic

message: Shouldn't it be "Jan Smuts in the South African Union "?
His whole career it was a Union.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 41.242.235.114 (talk) 10:36, August 22, 2007 (UTC) 
:This article is about Smuts's life from 1895 to 1899, when he was the State Attorney of the Transvaal - or the South African Republic as it was also known.  The Union of South Africa, which I take it is what you have in mind, was formed in 1910 and is therefore outwith the scope of this article.
:Xdamrtalk 21:42, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:Jane Birdwood, Baroness Birdwood

message: not sure she was a Baroness, at least not a UK one. She was never awarded a peerage in her own right. RodCrosby (talk) 12:28, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you read the opening paragraph? She was married to the Baron Birdwood, hence she was Baroness Birdwood.--UpDown (talk) 10:34, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's my understanding of the British Peerage, than being married to a Baron does not make one a Baroness. A Baroness is a woman who has had a Barony conferred on her in her own right. RodCrosby (talk) 15:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, sorry, your wrong. The wife always takes the titles from the husband. A quick read on Baron#Style of address would tell you this. She would rarely, if ever, be known as "Baroness Birdwood" by "Lady Birdwood", but it is correct legally to call her Baroness Birdwood in lead. --UpDown (talk) 16:44, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think if you read that again, carefully, you will find that it supports my point. However, it appears that Baron Birdwood's first wife, Elizabeth Vere Drummond Ogilvie, did use the title Baroness Birdwood until her death in 1997. Curious. So it appears there were two "Baroness Birdwoods" between 1954-97. Still don't think either of them were entitled to use the title, although of course I concede they did in fact do so. RodCrosby (talk) 17:22, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I shan't argue about it, but I am right, and I don't see how the article supports your point of view. In the UK, the wife of peer takes the female version of his title. In the case of a baron, she will always been known as "Lady X", but is legally "Baroness X". If you like I will provide reliable, 3rd party sources. Or you could ask someone on the Peerage wikiproject. --UpDown (talk) 17:27, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Baroness?

message: At the beginning of the 3rd paragraph of #2 Political activities "Besides for anti-immigration activism" needs changing. Would "Besides anti-immigration activism" or "Besides her anti-immigration activism" be better? Mcljlm (talk) 13:59, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Besides ... 

message: User:HapHaxion I can't work out how to change references 9 and 10 so that "p." appears before 38 instead of ":". Mcljlm (talk) 14:24, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference change 

message: The identifying picture is not of Dowager Lady Birdwood, but of her one-time mother-in-law. The NPG caption dates the picture at 1916, when the subject was 3 years old. RecklessMoment (talk) 22:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  incorrect image
Talk:History of Sioux City, Iowa

message: The section on the urban renewal contains unnecessary opinions, and does not read in an encyclopedic manner.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jschowin (talk • contribs) 22:02, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:07, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 
File talk:Iterative development model V2.jpg

message: The image suggests that after the implementation either deployment or testing follows. That doesn't make sense in my opinion. Deployment should succeed the last iteration of evaluation not implementation.
*I second that, and also there are other things I don't like with this image. IMO someone should change it so that it looks more like figure 2 in this paper. Alex.g (talk) 09:36, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deployment after Implementation?
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Topaz

message: Help:	2
Image talk:	1
Image:	17
Mainspace	102
Talk:	2
Template talk:	5
Template:	12
User talk:	122
User:	576
Wikipedia:	41
avg edits per article	4.81
earliest	23:31, 18 May 2004
number of unique articles	183
total	880
Stats generated using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. MER-C 12:14, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Jane Pitfield

message: It's clear that the Toronto mayoral election system is nonpartisan, but what about Pitfield herself?  What party is she a registered member of?  Unless Canada doesn't have party registration, then what political party is she closely associated with?  I'm guessing PC, but she also seems to have some strong ties to the Liberals, as well.
Canada has no party registration, and membership lists are confidential.  Also, parties at municipal, provincial and federal levels may have no connection with their namesakes at other levels.  Pitfield had the support of both Liberals and Conservatives when she ran for mayor, although many Liberals and Conservatives, as well as most New Democrats, supported Miller.  My guess is that she does not identify herself with any political party.  The Four Deuces (talk) 21:21, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Party affiliation? 
Talk:George Amon Webster

message: so pretty unicors live in the land of perunicorn land. they leat flowers and poop out rainbows!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.68.146.245 (talk) 00:53, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  hey 
Talk:The Crabb Family

message: This seems like an advertisement as to why the Crabb family or its members should be added to a concert billing  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tstab (talk • contribs) 16:06, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can add referenced info. I don't see anything that really needs to be removed. Maybe if you gave some specifics... --Musdan77 (talk) 00:13, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very biased article 
Talk:Southern Gospel Music Association

message: The SGMA Hall of Fame and Museum has been removed from Dollywood. According to a press release by SGMA, they are opening the new Hall of Fame and Museum at Biblical Times in Pigeon Forge, TN on September 9, 2022.
https://www.sgma.org/ Jordan Leach (talk) 19:51, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  SGMA Hall of Fame and Museum Moved
Talk:Top10 (rugby union)

message: "Albo d'oro" is not a trophy. It means "Past winners", because they are traditionally supposed to be written in a golden book (albo d'oro). Lo'oris - ロホリス 12:25, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albo d'oro 

message: Since 2010-11 season the championship's official name has changed. It's no longer Super 10, but Campionato di Eccellenza and its short name is Eccellenza. -- SERGIO aka the Black Cat 08:30, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New name 