Talk:International airport

message: Was wondering whether Airport of entry should be merged with and redirected here, because much of the information there appears to be duplicated in this article (and the basic definitions for both are similar).  Thoughts?  KeithH 08:33, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "International airport" has become more of a marketing term than anything else -- similar to the way a lot of Junior colleges renamed themselves Universities. Therefore, I don't believe the merger is warranted. Ewlyahoocom 03:56, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the size of airport and that this isn't a stub, I think they should be separate rather than a subheading in the airport article. Airport of entry is more a list of those airports, which the terminology section notes may or may not be branded international airports. The definitions are similar, but they are distinct terms, one more of a legal term, the other now more marketing or branding, as mentioned above. Toliar (talk) 15:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger? (from [[airport of entry]])

message: I have added a dubious tag. There is a statement that says smaller countries may have only international airports. While I'm not too sure, there are some countries with only domestic airfields and I know one which doesn't even have an airfield. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:03, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Vatican City claims to be a country. Good luck trying to land a 787 Dreamliner™ (batteries not included) there. K7L (talk) 14:18, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 

message: Okay, so can we have some opinions over what image must be used in the lead. I find the image of SFO too boring, and I think it should be replaced. What do you suggest? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:25, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I kind of like the one of San Francisco International Airport, but I do find it a bit dark. Another example photo would be a good alternative. --NickPenguin(contribs) 07:04, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks more like Star Trek Enterprise than an airport actually. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:46, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it is a featured picture. The caption could say something about the international terminal (see here), since that's what makes the airport operate as an international airport. Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 17:54, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  I love it. It looks so dramatic and it gives a sense of the scale of these things. It makes you look at it to see how such a structure works. It represents any number of international airports, and that would not be be case if it were a ground shot, which would make the airport look, dare I say it, pedestrian. Here we have an airport seen from the air and a Featured Picture too! Whiteghost.ink (talk) 01:34, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  It should at least be repositioned some how.  It's too wide, causing the lead text to be squashed.  And immediately followed by a long narrow TOC. David Condrey (talk) 18:57, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Your solution has fixed it. Thanks. Whiteghost.ink (talk) 23:53, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I like it the way it is, the night gives the lights at the airport an cool outline. You could always try commons:Category:Airports and sort good pictures. :File:Washington Dulles International Airport at Dusk.jpg was previous on the article but was removed for some reason, its also a FP! ///EuroCarGT 00:31, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images in the lead section 

message: I have separated the lede into two new paragraphs. I think the first should stand, but the wording and refs in the second incorporated into the body of the article. In the future when the article is in good shape the lede could be expanded to reflect the article as it developed. SovalValtos (talk) 12:02, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  The second para is a summary of what we have added during this current effort to improve the article. That is, I summarised it from material already included so it doesn't need to be incorporated but later might more might need to be done. Whiteghost.ink (talk) 00:43, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on International airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140603170609/http://www.flychicago.com/OHare/EN/AtAirport/Facilities/TravelerServices/Pages/Traveler-Services.aspx to http://www.flychicago.com/OHare/EN/AtAirport/Facilities/TravelerServices/Pages/Traveler-Services.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:36, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on International airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140921174031/http://www.worldairportawards.com/index.htm to http://www.worldairportawards.com/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:33, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)