Talk:Donald Danforth Plant Science Center

message: This article reads like a brochure or press release.  I'm sure that they do fine work, but the article's tone needs to be a bit more neutral. -Rglovejoy 1 August 2006
I concur with the previous comment by Rglovejoy. This article does not appear to be neutral. Maybe someone with a more intimate knowledge of the centre could correct that. Wiki4androo (talk) 01:00, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article neutrality 

message: Please remove the tags only after fixing the issues. Thank you. Wperdue (talk) 03:33, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag removal 

message: Edits have been made to remove the press release nature of the work, hopefully to willperdue's approval.Luolong (talk) 03:42, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Much better. Thank you. Wperdue (talk) 04:23, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

text: They're creeping back in again. WP:PEACOCK, WP:WEASEL, and other throw-away fluff makes this article pretty poor. Is this consensus that the prose changes of  this edit are not appropriate? DMacks (talk) 21:22, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The peacock terms and fluff are being added at the same time the tags are removed without explanation. This entry is getting worse, not better. Wperdue (talk) 03:19, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits Made 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Donald Danforth Plant Science Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090904214622/http://www.brdg-park.com:80/index.html to http://brdg-park.com/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:10, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hi  I think mostly your edit removed puffery however this one part  is just repeating their motto from their website. That part seems ok to leave in. Do you still want it out? Invasive Spices (talk) 18:52, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I would leave it out. It is unreferenced and promotional. . . Mean as custard (talk) 21:37, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of unnecessary

message: I have a conflict of interest as an employee of the Danforth Center. I am sharing a few suggested edits with updated information to improve the accuracy of this page.
*Update 25 principal investigators to 30 principal investigators
*References supporting change: https://www.danforthcenter.org/our-work/principal-investigators/
*Update “James C. Carrington is the current president” to “James C. Carrington is the current president and chief executive officer”
*References supporting change: https://www.danforthcenter.org/about-us/people/james-c-carrington/
Mzawicki (talk) 19:26, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead: I have reviewed these proposed changes and suggest that you go ahead and make the proposed changes to the page.  Signed, I Am Chaos (talk) 20:19, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some Proposed Changes