lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:FJ Reitz High School

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://sites.evscschools.com/AdminDefault.aspx?portalId=809445ac-3055-4a1c-8fda-1528d525e661&pid=1232d36b-5a7c-4f0a-8813-c5c45cc254a1&sid=19fb34e4-5107-4312-906a-855c04df392c and http://gridirondigest.net/index.php?/topic/11196-whos-got-the-nicest-stadium-in-indiana/page__st__107. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:20, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Just curious, but what is the rationale behind not allowing high school fight songs on their respective page? It is encyclopedic, and the same rules would also apply to college fight songs similarly.
: - Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools has created guidelines for school articles which are based on the input and consensus of a number of editors.  As you can see here, these guidelines suggest not including "the lyrics of the school song (or school anthem)" in articles about schools (colleges have their own guidelines).  Without guidelines, Wikipedia would become an indiscriminate collection of information.  Exceptions to guidelines are frequently made--following a discussion and consensus here on the article's talk page--when there is something particularly notable requiring an exception (for example, if the lyrics to this school's song were used to create the official State song).  Otherwise, a consensus of editors has agreed not to include school songs and so forth.  I hope this answers your question.  Magnolia677 (talk) 21:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  School Fight Songs 
Talk:The Field Mice

message: Doesn't mention 'For Keeps'? I'll fix tomorrow. --Sachabrunel 21:38, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed the only subjective word in the article. "perfect the" which was probably OTT in describing Ian Catt's future work. The rest seems fairly NPOV to me. As for this biog turning up in Last FM. Well it was here first because (there have been some other contributors of course) i originally wrote a large part of it ages ago as the history will show ya. so i'm removing the infobox.  --Jem (talk) 15:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advert/Last FM
Talk:Ceará

message: Hey folks. Can anyone provide details on whether the 3000 km² land dispute between Ceará and Piauí has been resolved yet — and if so, what was the outcome? //Big Adamsky 21:49, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed territories

message: The referred pronunciation [sɛaˈɾa] is not correct. There are basically two ways of pronouncing it in Brazil: [seaˈɾa] and [siaˈɾa], the latter being more widely used in the state itself. André Lima (talk) 11:57, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation of the name "Ceará" 
Talk:High Energy Liquid Laser Area Defense System

message: Updated to reflect more recent progress on the program since 2005 and cleaned up structure of the article.--Zimbob (talk) 12:33, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: This article should be updated.Pieter pietersen (talk) 23:27, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date 
Talk:Mara (Doctor Who)

message: Edit: Is the Mara's species really 'None'? Wouldn't it be 'Unkown'? Obviously it has to belong to a species, even if it's the last of it's kind. - The Doctor
:It's not the last of its kind, it's the only of its kind: a one-off, unique creation. --Paul A 02:56, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Dukkha, Anicca, and Anatta are the three Mara seen, but they're really all one. -- Noneofyourbusiness (talk) 22:50, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

text: The article references the Doctor, Tegan, Nyssa, & Adric, all being in Kinda. Actually, Nyssa was left out of that story, because at the time it was written, it wasn't known that the character of Nyssa would end up as a regular on the Doctor Who series, so, when it was time to do the story, they wrote that Nyssa wasn't well, & had to sleep for a while in the TARDIS, while the other three explored Deva Loka.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Splashen (talk • contribs) 23:58, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Sigil of Baphomet

message: sorry, but the bible verses that were quotes as 'references' on this page to peter gilmore's commentary are not references, and they have nothing to do with satanism or the image of baphomet. we wouldn't go to a christian page and vandalize it by writing verses from our satanic books, so christians, don't do it on our [satanic] pages. all it is, is clutter and it has nothing to do with satanism.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Venus Satanas (talk • contribs) 06:47, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Am I religious? I am a plain religionless person! The data I put was pertinent and well-referenced. Differently from what Venus Satanas claims, the information I included is consistent. It just analyzes what Gilmore said. Sane analysis is welcome to every researchable matter. What every person says is subject to analysis.--Algorithme (talk) 16:19, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Vandalism'?

message: the quote of the priest- why is it there? the priest has said stuff in that quote that are really just wrong; as a jew and hebrew speaking and reading person who has learnt the bible quite a lot, I say that. Quoting people with no official knowledge of the subject is bad for wikipedia. better to ask a rabbi if anyone.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.127.228.126 (talk) 01:30, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The page is about a symbol that a particular religion uses, which is also trademarked by that religion's organization.  An official representative of that religion and organization is explaining what it means to them and why they use it.  How is that NOT "official knowledge"?  What part of this don't you get?  If you think it's "better to ask a rabbi" about a symbol used by Satanists, then you might as well ask Satanists to give information on a page about Judaism. WillieBlues (talk) 07:59, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: The quote
Talk:Nslookup

message: User:172.216.36.19 dumped the output of invoking nslookup with the -? option on two platforms and the "unix man" page into the article.  I've removed them, on the grounds that (a) text dumps do not an encyclopaedia article make, and (b) the manual page is probably not GFDL licensed. Uncle G 21:57, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: --Hm2k (talk) 17:58, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raw text dumps excised 

message: All four external links are about how nslookup is flawed; I think that is POV, there should be (also) neutral links to documentation and such... 201.212.126.164 20:01, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Amen to that. --Karlosian 20:07, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

text: --Hm2k (talk) 17:58, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

text: I replaced some similar POV stuff to some facts. 164.58.171.152 (talk) 23:41, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links are POV 

message: Article says "The most common version of the program is included as part of the BIND package." More common than the version with Windows?? Nurg (talk) 23:58, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: --Hm2k (talk) 17:58, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most common version? 

message: The subcommands example seems quite unclear. Nurg (talk) 23:58, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: --Hm2k (talk) 17:58, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Subcommands example is unclear

message: The article says "Early in the development of BIND 9, the Internet Systems Consortium planned to deprecate nslookup in favor of host and dig. However, this decision was reversed in 2004..." - saying   "this decision was reversed" makes it sound like it was more than planned. I'm not sure if anything was actually effected, which is why I'm bringing it up. --Dinaq400 (talk) 16:13, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deprecated or planned for deprecation?
Talk:Feint

message: I have removed this section from the article because there are strong doubts to the notability/accuracy.  The original author of this section claims that the band like to drink battery and eat donuts.  In addition, the article on its drummer Thomas Viten is now the subject of .  --Hurricane111 21:57, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing Feint (norwegian band)

message: Feint has an equivelant meaning in melee combat.  Or is that juts too dicdef-y? i kan reed 05:57, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What about melee

message: feint also refers to components of distilled beverages  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.26.47.142 (talk) 23:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  alcohol 

message: "... single handed combat on a neutral vantage point".  Is 'vantage point' the correct term? It seems wrong to me but I won't change is because I don't know the terminology of combat. ike9898 (talk) 13:52, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this correct? 

message: Feint is a term use on lined note paper but is not in this page or on the one for ruled paper 86.173.98.24 (talk) 19:16, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paper
Talk:Uwe Mèffert

message: Merged from Uwe, of which the revision history was:
  # (cur) (last)  11:13, November 4, 2005 Jimshaw m
  # (cur) (last) 11:11, November 4, 2005 Jimshaw
Chick Bowen 21:58, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hoke Smith

message: Date of death is November 22, 1931 (not Nov. 27) according to
http://www.doi.gov/past_secretaries.html Dananderson 22:00, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Biographical Directory of the U.S. Congress has Nov 27 . University of Georgia houses his papers and lists his death as Nov 27 . Encyclopedia Britannica, though wrong almost as often as wikipedia, lists his death as Nov 27 . Thanks for making me go back and check, though. Sayeth 14:40, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Regarding the move of this page, Hoke Smith (97%) is the only iteration of Smith's name that constitutes over 5% of references to him on newspapers.com in Georgia. Star Garnet (talk) 22:48, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name
Talk:RAF Coastal Command

message: Seem strange that an article on Coastal Command makes not mention of the Avro Shackleton which was the mainstay of the command in the 1950s and 60s. MilborneOne (talk) 13:31, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You can probably tell that it was to be included in the Cold War op history. Now that I've moved the WWII op history to free space, I can see it being included in the main one now. Dapi89 (talk) 20:52, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Shackleton

message: I just had a quick look at this article. I noticed a couple of minor inconsistencies WRT citations. I made a couple of tweaks, but couldn't fix the following:
* the citations say "Goulter 1995", but the Bibliography has "2005" as the publication date - should be consistent;
* the citations have "Franklin 2003, p. 103." but there is no Franklin source in the Bibliography;
* the ISBN for the Hyde work doesn't seem to be correct;
* the format in the Bibliography is slightly inconsistent. For instance compare the March work to the Terraine work. In the March work the location is presented before the publisher, in the Terraine work the publisher is presented before the location. This should be consistent;
* two of the citations use the "harvnb" citation link, but most of them don't - this should be consistent, IMO.
Anyway, good work so far. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 05:15, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I wrote this article some months back, now I find someone has nominated - good show! I'll move to correct. Dapi89 (talk) 11:29, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: A quick review

message: The article makes no mention of the roles played by Enigma decrypts, the centimetric ASV radar or the Leigh Light in the Battle of the Atlantic. I would put something in myself but I am so far from being an expert it might well be laughable.  Cannot One Who Knows contribute? Moletrouser (talk) 18:23, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Try here: RAF Coastal Command during World War II.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.100.255 (talk) 21:03, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ultra, ASV, Leigh Light - no mention 

message: Tidied a few mad commas, altered operations to lower case, altered some pics to run level with the first line of paragraphs. A disappointing lack of realism in the antisoviet section though. Keith-264 (talk) 16:44, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Meaning? Dapi89 (talk) 18:34, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  CE
Talk:Volatility clustering

message: The example used in this article is incorrect. Implied volatility increases prior to an event (such as an earnings date), but realized volatility only increases on the day of (or day after) the earnings announcement. This article incorrectly confuses the two. A different example of volatility clustering should be used and references should be cited. 67.101.148.132 22:07, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect example

message: Volatility Pooling should redirect here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.20.207.164 (talk) 13:29, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volatility Pooling
Talk:William F. Vilas

message: Death date August 28, 1908 (not Aug. 27) according to
http://www.doi.gov/past_secretaries.html Dananderson 22:08, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Regarding the move of this page, William F. Vilas (48%), W. F. Vilas (30%), and William Vilas (18%) are the only iterations of Vilas's name that constitute over 5% of references to him on newspapers.com. Star Garnet (talk) 05:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name
Talk:Alligator Reef Light

message: 24° 51.1' is the same as 24° 51' 6". 80 37.1' = 80° 37' 6" (.1 minute = 6 sec, 60 seconds in one minute 60*.1=6). --Dual Freq 14:36, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates
Talk:The Twelve Dancing Princesses

message: Shouldn't the German title be Die zertanzten Schuhe (rather than Die zwölf tanzenden Prinzessinnen)? The only name I know the story by is Die zertanzten Schuhe and a quick look at the German wikisource (https://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Die_zertanzten_Schuhe) also always gives this name, from the first edition up to the latest one. AccioFelicis (talk) 16:10, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: German title

message: What a great story! Pity Walt Disney hasn't turned this into a film yet! Astrotrain 22:18, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Pretty sure the Brothers Grimm were not publishing anything in 1457.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.6.104.1 (talk) 22:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date Error 

message: It looks like this article says volume 2 was published in 1457. Should that be 1857? 135.180.52.27 (talk) 04:40, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of volume 2 

message: A dazzling, feminist fairytale from the bestselling author of The Miniaturist and The House of Fortune.
For her twelve daughters, Queen Laurelia's death in a motor car accident is a disaster beyond losing a mother. Their father, King Alberto, cannot bear the idea of the princesses ever being in danger and decides his daughters must be kept safe at all costs. Those costs include their lessons, their possessions and, most importantly, their freedom.
But the eldest, Princess Frida, will not bend to his will without a fight and she still has one possession her father can't take: the power of her imagination. And so, with little but wits and ingenuity to rely on, Frida and her sisters begin their fight to be allowed to live. 188.30.50.79 (talk) 12:33, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Restless Girls by Jessie Burton
Talk:Cape Florida Light

message: Previous locaton listed:  is in the middle of the water off shore. Click link then 'USA' then 'US specific map sources' then 'Find this location on Acme Mapper. Same dataset as TerraServer-USA but a different (better?) user interface.' You will see a crosshair showing the location on the topo. You have to zoom out once to see the topo, but it's in the water out to sea.
Location is:  If you go to the highest zoom you see Lighthouse on the topo and on the aerial you see the long shadow of the tower.
As you can see, there is nothing on the aerial photo at the first location. --Dual Freq 14:29, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates

message: The article failed the GA primarily for two reasons; firstly, the attack section needs to be trimmed and much better sourced, and the later history section needs to be cleaned up to make it more presentable to one unfamiliar to the subject, and a current status section needs to be added.  DoomsDay349 03:58, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed GA
Talk:Ruqayya bint Muhammad

message: Yes, I support a move to Ruqayyah bint Muhammad and a total cleanup and revision. Maybe I'll have time to do it ... some day. Zora 22:19, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the geneology article, the name is acceptable. Kerowyn  Leave a note  21:36, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The following was at the very bottom of the article, blow the categories.  Sounds like it is a statement that belongs on talk so I moved it here. (and then went back and checked history for who wrote it)  RJFJR 20:24, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncertain

message: We have when she died listed.  Do we know when she was born?
:No, we don't: not to the point where we can be dogmatic.
:However, it is generally accepted that (a) Khadija bore her children at two-year intervals, and (b) Ruqayyah was the fourth child. This suggests 601 as the approximate year of birth.Petra MacDonald 11:55, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Things to do

message: What exactly do these last two sentences have to do with genealogy ?! I want to delete them as they are unrelated, but I would like to hear justification, if any. I have changed the heading to "Minority view" to be inclusive, so that this sentence can stay, but if the section is improved by calling it "Genealogy" then I have no objections, but the Ahlul-bait part has nothing to do with genealogy. Unflavoured (talk) 03:06, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ahlul bait 

message: Utayba/Utaba was married to Ruqayya or Umm Kulthum? The articles on both daughters relate a story which involved Abu Lahab that is exactly the same regarding Utayba/Utaba. Zobeese (talk) 07:57, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Ibn Ishaq expressed similar confusion. The consensus of later historians (Ibn Saad, Tabari, etc.) is that Abu Lahab had two sons, Utba and Utayba, who were married to Ruqayyah and Umm Kulthum respectively in a double transaction. A few years later, they were divorced in a similar double transaction. It makes sense that Abu Lahab would have wanted to be rid of both daughters-in-law simultaneously. It is said that Utayba suffered a nasty death but that Utba lived to repent. However, I can't find these stories in the references that I have to hand.Petra MacDonald (talk) 23:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Utayba and Ruqayya/Umm Kalthum
Talk:Fowey Rocks Light

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—71.53.177.16 (talk) 23:45, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Coordinates are correct. 25°35′26.249″N 80°05′48.242″W is the same as 25.59062,-80.09673. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Border Town ‖ 00:27, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

text: . As above. Deor (talk) 12:16, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Lutheran Church in America

message: Why reverted?
All unlinkings were in accordance with MoS - not to link standalone years (most of the changes), not to link words unless they have a specific relevance to the subject (so no linking of e.g. 'United States' or 'New York'). Colonies Chris 22:26, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You were right sorry. Thought that Lutheran and other related words had been delinked. EdwinHJ | Talk 02:26, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion of unlinkings?
Talk:St. Lucie Inlet

message: Please does anyone have the latest news on when the saint lucie inlet is to be dredged
:That's the responsibility of the Army Corps of Engineers. Google found this site, http://www.martin.fl.us/portal/page?_pageid=73,276034&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL, which says dredging is scheduled for November. -- Donald Albury(Talk) 02:13, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  saint lucie inlet
Talk:Baker's Haulover Inlet

message: That it is believed the area was named after a fisherman named Baker is stated in the first source . That makes it more than a rumor, IMHO. -- Donald Albury 03:20, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

message: I just came across what purports to be a researched book about the history of Baker's Haulover. If anyone wants to expand this article, this might (or might not) be something worth checking out. The website for the book is . Douglas Whitaker (talk) 15:41, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book about the history being released
Talk:Joe Cipriano

message: New to Wiki - so I did not anticipate the verbatim content flag - and thought the two versions were unique - I have since posted permission on the page in question .--Tomanthonyva 22:23, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled