Talk:Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (2007 film)

message: Sometimes film critics and reviewers do make a bit strange choices concerning the definition of a movie genre, but I can't imagine a world where this movie could be called a comedy, either black or any other sort. There's not a single comical moment in Burton's Sweeney Todd. A black comedy is basically a genre of cruel jokes, comical situations with grim background. It's surreal, all right, but there are no jokes in this movie. It's a pure musical thriller or even slasher. I suggest removing the words "black comedy" from the article. 94.77.130.12 (talk) 19:18, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No comedy? How about the songs "Pirelli's Miracle Elixir" and "A Little Priest"... there are certainly jokes in those songs. Even the subdued, shortened version of "A Little Priest" that's used in the movie is hilarious; it's full of jokes. 71.38.117.4 (talk) 02:25, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black Comedy? 

message: Going through the various reviews etc there are a few outstanding issues we still have to address, so I've listed them below. EyeSerenetalk 09:33, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To-do list per Peer Review 

message: I've been cleaning up a lot of the character info boxes for characters in Sweeney Todd (not just specific to the film version) because someone had gone through and added specific birth dates that did not match the story.  I just noticed that the plot description in this article said it was set in 1846, which does not make any sense.  The original story (which was written in 1846, perhaps this is the cause of confusion) was set in 1785.  The musical stage adaptations have had a variety of settings, including modern times, but traditionally the story has always been said to occur in the late 18th century, and Burton's film appears to match this as well.  The clothing styles are somewhat jumbled, but most of it seems to be late 18th century with a few anachronistic exceptions.  The film has a child being executed for petty theft, which was ended in 1808, and execution of children in general was very rare by the mid 19th century.  I've removed the 1846 date, but if there is a cite that the film version is supposed to be set in a specific year it should be provided.
12.40.5.69 (talk) 00:08, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation for the "1846" setting? 

message: In the movie, death occurred within seconds of Sweeney's victim's throats beging slit. However, even in cutting both the cartoid and jugulars, unconsciousness occurs within ten to forty seconds, and death happens almost a minute later. This varies on a variety of factors, such as heart rate, depth of the cut, and how quickly the cut bleeds out. You must remember, the human body contains approxamately 5 quarts of blood. Should this be mentioned in the article?Latte freak (talk) 22:30, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No. It should be mentioned only if it was a concern of a critic or someone involved with the film and it is sourced. Films have plot "holes" but as they are works of fiction, they don't necessarily need to work under the laws of nature. BOVINEBOY2008 :) 22:36, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sondheim's Mistake...Should it be mentioned? 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support The proposer is indeed correct.--Labattblueboy (talk) 07:31, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (2007 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090115053330/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com:80/hr/film/reviews/article_display.jsp?rid=10285 to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/film/reviews/article_display.jsp?rid=10285
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080806231716/http://ap.google.com:80/article/ALeqM5gyhNC8FWQtoG_N7y0gWoKA2PV18gD92B7PLO0 to http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gyhNC8FWQtoG_N7y0gWoKA2PV18gD92B7PLO0
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:25, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (2007 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=%2Fopinion%2F2007%2F05%2F13%2Fdp1301.xml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120205071929/http://www.observer.com/2007/he-s-19-he-s-beautiful-and-he-s-bloody-good to http://www.observer.com/2007/he-s-19-he-s-beautiful-and-he-s-bloody-good
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071211184324/http://www.nbrmp.org/awards/past.cfm?year=2007 to http://www.nbrmp.org/awards/past.cfm?year=2007
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:31, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (2007 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071218132534/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/113573.html to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/113573.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080602202136/http://www.sanfranciscosentinel.com/?p=8434 to http://www.sanfranciscosentinel.com/?p=8434
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070125204347/http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/8049 to http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/8049
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071211140114/http://www.suntimes.com/business/689434,CST-FIN-lew10.article to http://www.suntimes.com/business/689434,CST-FIN-lew10.article
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071227024932/http://www.marcustheatres.com/index_sub.cfm?pageid=subpages%2Fsweenytodd.html&CFID=5803576&CFTOKEN=97826629 to http://www.marcustheatres.com/index_sub.cfm?pageid=subpages%2Fsweenytodd.html&CFID=5803576&CFTOKEN=97826629
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:37, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I'm tempted to put ===See also=== Soylent Green (a film where people unwittingly eat processed dead people) but given the importance of this page, I thought I'd discuss it first. Renard Migrant (talk) 19:42, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also