lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Consensual homicide

message: I just wanted to note that a search for assisted suicide presently sends the searcher to this consensual homicide page.  They should probably be sent to the euthanasia page instead, since most folks use the term "assisted suicide" interchangeably with "physician-assisted suicide."  Searches for the latter are currently forwarded to the euthanasia page, which makes sense.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.193.240.124 (talk) 23:41, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assisted Suicide 

message: Article needs a discussion of Holland's approach to regulating the practice.LeadSongDog 14:01, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holland 

message: There's already an article about Euthanasia which talks about Holland, Oregon, etc. - shouldn't it be merged? Wikiak 00:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Euthanasia

message: The USA is one nation in a world of around 200 nations... all I have to say resally  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.105.76.223 (talk) 16:24, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: American centred
Talk:Glen Keane

message: * I changed the filmography for Glen Keane cause someone added credits from Disney / Toon Studios and Walt Disney Television Animation films and television shows. Those films and shows are done by forigen animators and Glen Keane had no part in them, neither did he take part for the animation for Cody in The Rescuers Down Under and Donald and Daisy Duck in Fantasia / 2000. - 24.81.112.42  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.112.42 (talk) 17:48, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Didn’t Glen Keane also animate the shark from The Little Mermaid as well as Ariel?  I kind of looks like it. NDEdminson (talk) 19:57, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Little Mermaid
Talk:John O'Donovan (scholar)

message: Could the link to bar be updated to point to a page that is not a disambig?  I was informed that the page that I linked to was not the proper one, so if somebody with a greater understanding of the subject could take care of it, that would be wonderful. --Maelnuneb (Talk) 19:35, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bar 

message: Could some expert specify please. Also the children need clearer treatment. And what is "Cromwellian stock"? A descendant of Oliver Cromwell, or, I suspect, someone who was owed money in England in the 1650s and happened to take land in Ireland in recompense. How do we know that they had anything to do with Cromwell himself, his army or his policies? JO'D was an important man in many ways and this sort of sloppiness should not be on his wiki page.86.42.192.16 (talk) 08:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hoberlin or Oberlin?

message: It is doubtful that O’Donovan was “Ireland’s first historic topographer”. Samuel Lewis (publisher) had published his extensive Topographical Dictionary of Ireland in two large volumes already in 1837, replete with a wealth of historical information for each location. O’Donovan was not amongst the thousands of subscribers thereto and listed therein. As the wiki article on Lewis indicates, his work “has not been superseded”.  Perhaps the truth is that he was the first, but O’Donovan superseded him? Max Kaertner (talk) 18:35, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: First Topographer?

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: various cited sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:02, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Arizona

message: A discussion has been started on trying to standardize the format of the lists with tables and whatnot. It can be found here. Murderbike (talk) 07:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A consensus was reached for "National Register of Historic Places listings in Arizona."  But the discussion continues and could be revised in the future. I just hope it is not ad infinitum. — Motorrad-67 (talk) 12:32, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Standardizing lists

message: Photos overlap text. Needs attention sometime. --Pete Tillman (talk) 23:03, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks okay on my screen. Anyone else getting overlap? --sanfranman59 (talk) 23:27, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks okay for me, too.  What photos are overlapping what text?  Nyttend (talk) 23:35, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo overlap problem
Talk:I did not have sexual relations with that woman

message: Granted I could learn more about current events, but I haven't come by this "catchphrase" at all.  Is this page necessary?  And if it is, then shouldn't there be one for Nixon's, "I am not a crook."?  I feel this page should be marked for deletion.  (Unless there is relevance that I'm not seeing; in that case please ignore my ignorance. o_O) -WarthogDemon 19:38, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI, as per the merge suggestion, we're discussing the proposed merge at Talk:Lewinsky scandal - so far, three people have replied, all saying we think this article should continue to stand. (And I also think "I am not a crook" could support its own article.)  Tvoz |talk 06:42, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that merge suggestion finally closed as consensus not to merge. And, WarthogDemon, I don't know how you never came across this catch phrase. It was huge. But, oh well. Flyer22 01:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this page necessary? 

message: Shouldn't the specific episode titles of the TV shows referenced (JAG and Gilmore Girls, respectively) be mentioned?  I mean, JAG lasted ten seasons and Gilmore Girls lasted seven.  That's a lot of episodes… –Micahbrwn (talk) 00:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: For anyone who reads this, that section (the popular culture section that was in this article) was removed in early April (April 7th) as "non-notable trivia". Flyer22 (talk) 04:31, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular culture section 

message: This page is ridiculous and is further evidence of Wikipedia's extreme right-wing bias.
Why, I wonder, isn't there a page for Bush's infamous "Bring 'em on" taunt?
(And unlike Clinton's remark, Bush's comment no doubt led to the deaths of a number of U.S. soldiers in Iraq, killed by enraged insurgents inspired by Bush's reckless words).
And how about Larry Craig's "I am not gay, I have never been gay?" That should have a page of its own as well.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.99.104.234 (talk) 02:16, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it probably should - you want to start I am not gay, I have never been gay? – ukexpat (talk) 15:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is ridiculous
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Arkansas

message: Missouri-Pacific Railroad is an incorrect and inaccurate name form which is being perpetuated by unfortunate use in numerous National Register listings.  The correct corporate name is Missouri Pacific Railroad (no hyphen between 'Missouri' and 'Pacific').  This correct name form can be verified by a review of any Interstate Commerce Commission docket (ICC Reports), any 'Poors Manual of Railroads', or any 'Official Guide of the Railways' entry for Missouri Pacific Railroad.RI-Bill 05:39, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A discussion has been started on trying to standardize the format of the lists with tables and whatnot. It can be found here. Murderbike (talk) 07:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Standardizing lists
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in California

message: I was just reviewing the Napa County list and I think it includes items that are on the State of California list but not on the NRHP list. I've traced a couple of the additions to edits made by User:63.194.52.252 on April 4, 2007 (diff). Unfortunately, the database for the search feature at the NPS website is only updated through January 9, 2007. I don't just want to undo this user's edits without first confirming that the places are not on the current NRHP list. Is there somewhere I can find a complete NRHP list? I know I can open each of the weekly update links on the NRHP search page, but I'd prefer to avoid that tedium. --Sanfranman59 (talk) 19:49, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Napa listings 

message: Hey, nice job with formatting this state NRHP list.  I like the 2 columns of photos next to the table of counts by county.  Hopefully, though, you can get a clickable version of the California counties map?  Anyhow, it beats the formatting of the List of RHPs in NY (which also does not have a clickable map).  Good stuff. :) doncram (talk) 18:40, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Maine

message: A discussion (and a bit of action) has been started about standardizing the tables for all the state's NRHP lists. Discussion can be found here. Input is encouraged! Murderbike (talk) 03:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardization of state NRHP lists 

message: MAINE, ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY,
Main Street-Frye Street Historic District,
Frye St. and portions of Main St. and College St.,
Lewiston,  08001355,
LISTED, 1/23/09
MAINE, AROOSTOOK COUNTY,
Lagassey Farm,
786 Main St.,
Saint Agatha,  08001356,
LISTED, 1/21/09
MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
Bailey Island Library Hall,
2167 Harpswell Island Rd.,
Harpswell,  08001253,
LISTED, 12/31/08
MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
Portland Stove Foundry,
57 Kennebec St.,
Portland,  74000164,
REMOVED, 1/22/09
MAINE, HANCOCK COUNTY,
Surry Town Hall,
1217 Surry Rd.,
Surry,  08000993,
LISTED, 10/16/08
MAINE, KENNEBEC COUNTY,
Kent Burying Ground,
NE corner of Fayette Corner Rd. and Oak Hill Rd.,
Fayette,  08001254,
LISTED, 12/31/08
MAINE, KENNEBEC COUNTY,
Wing Family Cemetery,
Pond Rd., E side, N of jct. with ME 133,
Wayne vicinity, 91001514,
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION APPROVED, 1/14/09
MAINE, KENNEBEC COUNTY,
Winthrop Street Historic District (Boundary Increase),
20 Spring St.,
Augusta,  08001255,
LISTED, 12/30/08
MAINE, LINCOLN COUNTY,
Pythian Opera House,
86 Townsend Ave.,
Boothbay Harbor,  08001256,
LISTED, 12/30/08
MAINE, OXFORD COUNTY,
Forest Lodge,
Carry Rd., about 1.9 mi. W. of Middle Dam,
Upton,  08001257,
LISTED, 12/30/08
MAINE, OXFORD COUNTY,
Rivercroft Farm,
55, 59 and 60 River St.,
Fryeburg,  08000668,
LISTED, 7/16/08
MAINE, OXFORD COUNTY,
Soldiers Memorial Library,
85 Main St.,
Hiram,  08000992,
LISTED, 10/16/08
MAINE, PENOBSCOT COUNTY,
Allan, Harold Schoolhouse,
15 Rebel Hill Rd.,
Clifton,  08000667,
LISTED, 7/16/08
MAINE, PENOBSCOT COUNTY,
Cliffwood Hall,
15 Rebel Hill Rd.,
Clifton,  08000666,
LISTED, 7/16/08
MAINE, SOMERSET COUNTY,
Kromberg Barn,
E. side of E. Pond Rd., across from number 462,
Smithfield,  08001357,
LISTED, 1/22/09
MAINE, WASHINGTON COUNTY,
Plummer, Capt. John, House,
23 Pleasant St.,
Addison,  08001358,
LISTED, 1/21/09
MAINE, YORK COUNTY,
Biddeford-Saco Mills Historic District,
Bounded by Pearl, Lincoln, York and Main Sts., Biddeford, Gooch and Saco Sts.,
Biddeford,  08001258,
LISTED, 12/30/08
MAINE, YORK COUNTY,
District No. 5 School,
781 Gore Rd.,
Alfred,  09000015,
LISTED, 2/04/09
--sanfranman59 (talk) 05:44, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NRHP actions posted 4/25/2008 through 2/13/2009
Talk:DePatie–Freleng Enterprises

message: Does this mean "politically correct"?  Maybe there's a better way of phrasing it.
208.232.182.67 (talk) 16:43, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The cartoons were edited and in some cases re-dubbed to make them more PC" 

message: Didn't DePatie-Freleng do the animation of the lightsabers in the first Star Wars film? 71.95.53.89 (talk) 20:13, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Wars lightsabers 

message: They are six animated features to be co-produced by Walt Disney Feature Animation with DFE films:
*Aladdin is released in 1992
*Mulan is released in 1998
*Tarzan is released in 1999
*The Emperor's New Groove is released in late 2000
*Lilo & Stitch is released in 2002
*Home on the Range is released in 2004
Note: All six animated features (except for The Lion King, Pocahontas, The Hunchback of Notre Dame, Fantasia 2000, Atlantis: The Lost Empire, Treasure Planet, Brother Bear and Teacher's Pet), they are co-produced by Walt Disney Feature Animation with DFE Films.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.64.247.95 (talk) 13:38, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Citation needed. oknazevad (talk) 15:41, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Walt Disney Feature Animation films produced by DFE films 

message: Didn't this studio do the rather low quality animated segment in the original Peter Cook & Dudley Moore version of "Bedazzled" where Pete & Dud are cheaply and unconvincingly transformed into flies? 62.7.182.106 (talk) 15:15, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bedazzled
Talk:Mixtec transnational migration

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! Moved the page to a simpler, more accurate title, added sections, a few wikilinks. JubalHarshaw 19:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article includes the following claim in the second sentence of the lede:
:: Nevertheless, the Mixtec have remained an autonomous community; indeed, they remain one of the last autonomous Mesoamerican indigenous groups.
Unfortunately, 'autonomous community' only links to Autonomous communities of Spain, which is clearly in error.  I've therefore removed the link.  The article needs to clarify precisely what is meant by saying that the Mixtec are an autonomous community?  What sort of autonomy do they have?  Is it some sort of self-government under Mexico's constitution, or something cultural?  None of the related articles appear to explain this, and it's rather important that Wikipedia be clearer on these matters. --86.175.60.75 (talk) 11:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autonomous community?
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Connecticut

message: Hey, since NRHP docs are available on-line for almost all Connecticut NRHPs now, it would seem beneficial to create good stub articles.  How about working on the National Register of Historic Places listings in New Haven, Connecticut list first?  (Because there are stub/starter articles for most of its 59 entries already; because an editor, perhaps local, has been active, recently been developing the New Haven, Connecticut article.  Happy to consider other ideas. --doncram (talk) 17:21, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  good stub creation drive
Talk:Magnetocrystalline anisotropy

message: Room-temperature anisotropy constants ( × 104 J/m3 ).[1] 
Structure 	K1 	K2
Ni 	−0.5 	−0.2
This doesn't seems right. K2 should be positive for metallic nickel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.254.89.70 (talk) 11:26, 13 April 2018
:Why do you think it should be positive? In Table 1 of , various sources give values of K2 between -2.3 and -5.1, so actually -0.2 may not be negative enough. RockMagnetist(talk) 17:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I notice the dates of those publications are all relatively early. In Darby and Isaac, on page 295, they say that the early results were highly inconsistent, but newer results were agreeing on a negative value for K2. Maybe I'll add a note to that effect. RockMagnetist(talk) 15:58, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

text: I hope you'll contribute to some Wikipedia articles. You clearly have the research skills! RockMagnetist(talk) 15:59, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Nickel
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Delaware

message: Moving these here so I can keep track and make changes at once:
===New Castle to Kent===
*Savin-Wilson House is in Kent County. (Based on the hundred, the coodsr and the streets.)
*Mount Pleasant is in Kent County.  (Hundred, coords and Street all use Smyrna address but south of Duck Creek.)
===Kent to New Castle===
*St. Joseph's Industrial School: This is the only parcel in Clayton municipal limits in NCC.  Organization identifies property as almost entirely in NCC.
RevelationDirect (talk) 01:21, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: County Corrections

message: *St. Joseph's Industrial School: This is the only parcel in Clayton municipal limits in NCC.  Organization identifies property as almost entirely in NCC.
RevelationDirect (talk) 01:21, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Kent to New Castle

message: Most of the rural NRHP listings in Delaware give a description of the location rather than the formal address, like 2 miles from town near a stream. This is because areas that had to drive into town to pick up mail didn't have a street address or a named street.  (The intersections were sometimes named though, like Pearsons Corner or Cowgills Corner.) Some of the listings had a country road number but these were only used on deeds and never had road signs posted. In the 1990s, "911 addresses" were created to reduce volunteer fire companies response times and streets were named with signs posted and street numbers were assigned. So many (most?) of the Delaware listings have obsolete addresses.
In most cases, web sites mentioning the new addresses are neighborhood notices rather than reliable sources and my driving by and reading street signs is original research. Based on the map source guidelines, I'm going to use a Google Street View link showing the image of the building with the new address as the citation. If you have any questions/concerns, just tag me on my talk page so we can discuss. RevelationDirect (talk) 23:43, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: 911 address
Talk:Daymar College

message: Someone with patience needs to go through the history section to make it more comprehensible. I have worked on it some but it is still a mess. UnkleFester (talk) 05:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section is still a mess
Talk:Catherine Seipp

message: :Actually, she's a former columnist for The New York Press and Salon.com, if I'm not mistaken. Ruthfulbarbarity 19:46, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated information

message: :There are twelve entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion. 
*ELpoints #3) states: 
*Linkfarm states: 
*WP:ELMIN: . Trim links per above.--  Otr500 (talk) 06:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:Ellen Church

message: Jocamero (talk) 01:10, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This was during the Great Depression, plus she was a woman. According to this source, in the 1930s, a white woman's average annual salary was $863. Clarityfiend (talk) 12:09, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion and sources cited 
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in the United States Virgin Islands

message: There were 2 listed:	
*St. Thomas Synagogue
September 25, 1997	Crystal Gade #16AB, Queens Quarters
18°20′34″N 64°55′58″W	Charlotte Amalie an NHL, and;	
*St. Thomas Synagogue-Beracha Veshalom Vegemiluth Hasadim		August 15, 1997	16AB Krystal Gade
18°20′34″N 64°55′58″W an NRHP.  If you think a bit, there probably aren't 2 St. Thomas Synagogues in the whole world! Smallbones(smalltalk) 21:11, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed 2nd St. Thomas Synagogue

message: Just for use as a photo aid
:That left a table in place, back in 2013.  I just removed it in 2017 as it was outdated, and we can see which photos needed in the article.  Maybe what the table did was supplanted by wp:NRHPprogress tallying and tools, since then? --doncram 00:34, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos needed - not complete or necessarily accurate
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Guam

message: This item:
: 104 
: Tomhum Pillbox III   March 4, 1991 	East San Vitores Drive  13° 30′ 23″ N 144° 47′ 82″ E﻿ 
: Tamuning  Japanese Coastal Defense Fortifications on Guam TR
has an error in its coordinates. It's probably a typo, but I don't know what the right location is.
Searching nps.gov led me to a registration form which had UTM coords of 55 261500 1494250.
This translates to   or  
This looks to be about 200 feet offshore, in Tumon Bay.
—WWoods (talk) 19:11, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tomhum Pillbox III 
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-10-16/Copyright

message: 'In a mailing list post on Sunday' - can this be linked to the source? -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  19:54, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The link has been added. Flcelloguy (A note?) 00:12, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  01:44, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Eu

message: I just reverted a change in redirect from European Union to Eu (disambiguation). I see there is sort of a very slow edit war over this (just a few reverts per year). So it needs to be settled. Surely, by far most people who type in 'eu' will be looking for the EU. Right? DirkvdM 19:56, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Eu" does not seem a likely match for "EU".  People might be looking for the town in France, or for the element Europium, at the very least.  I'm reverting. john k 22:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, there will be some people looking for the French village or the element or what have you, but what matters is what will most people expect. I'm pretty sure that at the vast majority of people typing 'eu' (both lowercase, which is automatically changed to 'Eu') will mean 'EU'. So I'll revert again. Isn't there a way to determine how often each entry was clicked when 'eu' redirected to 'EU'? DirkvdM 09:40, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That something is, by a small margin, the most common meaning does not mean that it gets the redirect.  "Eu" does not clearly refer to the EU at all.  "eu" may, but so what?  If somebody clicks on it, they get a disambiguation page, and can click right through to the EU article.  For anybody looking for another meaning, they have to click through multiple pages.  Also note that most links to Eu appear to be to the French town.  When in doubt, send it to the disambiguation page. I'm reverting again. john k 17:25, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with john k and will redirect to Eu (disambiguation). Moonraker (talk) 00:22, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: (Retired user): This is a tad silly. I wager that very nearly every search for "EU" is for the European Union, rather than Star Wars Expanded Edition, say, or Edinburgh University. 131.111.185.45 (talk) 21:14, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect where?
Talk:Virginia State Route 83

message: Additions:
;Wise
*1930-31 5.00 Pound west towards Kentucky
*1944 -5.00 US 23 at Donkey southwest to end
This obviously adds up.
;Dickenson
4.90 (1936)
*1928 5.00 Haysi to Dickenson County
This adds up.
;Buchanan
10.38+15.80
*1928 16.00 Grundy via Stacy to West Virginia
*1930-31 9.58 SR 126 near Grundy west towards Dickenson County
*1931 1.62 towards Haysi
This adds up.
--NE2 19:57, 17 October 2006 (UTC)