Talk:Ned Kelly (2003 film)

message: It's quite unforunate some people regard this movie as a bomb; I thought it was really good. Perhaps due to the fact that it played in about 5 theatres in the whole country makes people think it wasn't successful, as I don't remember it coming to ANY theatre in my area. Morhange 21:08, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Image:Ned Kelly 2003 movie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ned Kelly 2003 movie.jpg

message: How historically accurate is it? Badagnani (talk) 02:55, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This movie attempts to re-write history.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.28.54.73 (talk) 13:02, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy 

message: Under 'Reception' the world-wide earnings are said to be about $6 million, but under 'Box Office', it is claimed that nationally the film grossed over $8 million. Obviously, the national earnings can't be greater than the world-wide earnings. Box Office Mojo (linked to in the 'Reception' section) states 'Domestic Total as of Apr. 11, 2004: $86,959'. This suggests that the quoted national Box office figure is inflated by a factor of 100.  
Smcg8374 02:16, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy regarding earnings 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ned Kelly (2003 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090521082343/http://www.newsweekly.com.au/articles/2003apr19_ned.html to http://www.newsweekly.com.au/articles/2003apr19_ned.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:39, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified