Talk:United States Forest Service

message: Made a few changes to the article i felt it was lacking allot of info on the forest service, Feel free to clean it up. Vlarian559 (talk) 06:31, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: moved sections around trying to create a flow and smooth reading experience, please feel free to read this article and adjust it so that sections flow together. I'm looking for someone to proof read this article and help with it's editing--Vlarian559 (talk) 20:06, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

text: Also most of this info comes from the USFS website and a book created by the Forest Service to help introduce itself to the new Administration "The U.S. Forest Service An Overview" 2009 I'll add the weblink to this book as soon as the FS web site comes back up--Vlarian559 (talk) 20:06, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes

message: Funny, there is absolutely no mention about the Forest Service's annual attempt to chase down the hippies when they take to the woods. In recent years this has become fraught with confrontations, heavy-handed policing, roadblocks and some scary scenes that have resulted in class successful actions against the USFS.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.39.49.14 (talk) 23:34, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Rainbow Gathering]]

message: It would be helpful to have Regions showing the different areas on a map. Leitmotiv (talk) 15:15, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Regions

message: The controversies section is a bit lacking at the moment. The first paragraph or two make a lot of factual claims, without any references. The airplane controversy section used a wiki page as a reference, and the rest is somewhat disorganized. I don't want to erase someone's work without putting it out for consensus first...can someone please either rewrite this section (also, preferably with a tone that is more NPOV?) and add approriate references? Otherwise, the uncited material should be removed.Jbower47 (talk) 22:23, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I am working on this now. DerekELee (talk) 14:11, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies re-write 

message: is missing completely. Unfortunately, there is hardly any information in the official website incl. statistics. --Mattes (talk) 13:47, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volunteering 

message: Perhaps another section that includes attendance datahttps://www.fs.usda.gov/rmrs/recreating-color-promoting-ethnic-diversity-public-lands for National Forests could be created. This would bring attention to government research articles highlighting racial inequities in National Forest use by the U.S. general public.https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_journals/2018/rmrs_2018_flores_d002.pdfSavsleev (talk) 02:54, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Forest Attendance 

message: The National Partnership Office does not need a seperate article to the United States Forest Service. -- Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:35, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Crescent77 (talk) 02:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: A merge to National Rural Development Partnership would seem to be a more specific, and hence better, target. Klbrain (talk) 09:48, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[National Partnership Office]] into [[United States Forest Service]]