Talk:Facundo

message: Because this talk page has been rather busy, there's perhaps a danger of some of the points raised further up the page being missed. I've distilled the remaining outstanding issues into a new list below - hopefully I haven't overlooked any. Hope this helps in the final run-up to GA! EyeSerenetalk 09:58, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think those are all dealt with now. Mike Christie (talk) 13:52, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

text: I have changed most of the Ball's references to Shumway's. Hope it is better now... Bessiec (talk) 02:56, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: should I put more information about this?--Mjlee27 (talk) 04:23, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not necessarily more information, but what I'm suggesting is that you revisit pp. 10-11 Sorensen G and ensure that you have got what's most useful and important from her argument about barbarism.  --jbmurray (talk|contribs) 18:23, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Every issue I noticed, including a couple of areas I had just come back to address per my previous post, has been cleaned up to GA+ standard. Nice work! -- Michael Devore (talk) 18:00, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

text: I've added a small part in order to clarify this meaning. It is quite confusing. Apologies T^T--Mjlee27 (talk) 16:51, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Found the page number ^^--Mjlee27 (talk) 16:51, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

text: I checked and I quoted exactly how it is in the book. Hope it makes sense ^^ --Mjlee27 (talk) 16:52, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent. Another three down... EyeSerenetalk 17:19, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

text:  Fantastic job. You have done it again!! It's amazing to see how you are able to turn nothing into art! ^^ Thank you! --Mjlee27 (talk) 16:51, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Art!! You're too kind (really!) :D EyeSerenetalk 17:19, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

text: That is so much better! I'll change it right away. I think the meaning is clearer. Thank you!--Mjlee27 (talk) 16:51, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: One more done! Mike Christie (talk) 17:02, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated to-do list 

message: Not sure if the writers here want to try FAC, but I do see the need for more work on the article. I'm poor at keeping specific lists as I copyedit, but...
* by the time I reached "Themes", what really hit me was the repetition. I've been barbarically bruised by the repeated mention of barbarism vs civilization, and despite the repetition, I feel this theme is not explored in enough depth—or perhaps it would be deeper if the existing text on the theme was brought closer together in the article.
* as prof mentions, "Genre and style" is slim. Is there more that can be said about how Sarmiento writes?
;Themes—specific items
* "Sorensen" is not the full last name of the ref, but is used that way in the text
* "The government decided to decipher the message, and on learning the translation, said,... " -- hows does the government "say", much less in a colloquial-sounding quotation?
I can go back to earlier sections of the article and provide more feedback if the writers are still participating here. It's a very good article and an interesting topic, especially being a work of "creative non-fiction". –Outriggr § 04:15, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd hoped we had got that repetition sorted out, but obviously not :P It's been a fairly constant issue, so if you've got any suggestions...? I'm not sure whether Bessiec, Mjlee27 and Hector Argene will be back either (they've already gone above and beyond the call of duty to get to this point!), so beyond continuing to improve the text I don't really see what more we can do here. EyeSerenetalk 20:47, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: the sections themes indeed is a problematic section. Deeply apologetic. Unfortunately, since the Facundo team have finals coming up, we won't be as active. I'll try to work on the problems... perhaps this weekend?? Thank you Outriggr and EyeSerene for pointing this out ^^. We deeply appreciate your help.--Mjlee27 (talk) 17:21, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite right, exams first - there's plenty of time later if you want to continue to work on the article! We'll still be here ;) EyeSerenetalk 20:58, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Template:Domingo Faustino Sarmiento‎ has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. MBelgrano (talk) 15:33, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination for deletion of [[:Template:Domingo Faustino Sarmiento‎]] 

message: I could fix the initial reference to page 94 of Sarmiento 2003, which accidentally reused the reftag sarm93; but to check the repeated references named sarm93 the book is required. -- Cat's paw (talk) 21:52, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference tag sarm93 needs to be checked 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Facundo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090325041250/http://www.e-libro.net/E-libro-viejo/gratis/facundo.pdf to http://www.e-libro.net/E-libro-viejo/gratis/facundo.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified