Talk:Worldwide Developers Conference

message: The 2003 WWDC was scheduled to be in San Jose from May 19-23, but the location and dates were changed at a very late date, causing some attendees to complain about having to change travel plans at the last minute. --Luciuskwok 16:33, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article, especially the WWDC 2006 section, is written with a heavy bias towards Apple. Themodernizer 02:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh? How exactly do you feel the article is "heavily biased" towards Apple, apart from the fact that it doesn't say how great Windows Vista will be when it finally comes out? The WWDC 2006 section is mostly just a list of market facts and product information that were announced at this event. "NPOV" does not mean "never mention anything that could make Apple products sound fun or useful", anyway. Aragorn2 19:32, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I could have sworn there was a WWDC in 2002...
: Their was, but at this point no one added information about it. I think Apple announced it stopped all development of OS 9, previewed Jaguar, and announced development of rack mounted servers; but if someone could confirm this with sources. WikipedianYknOK 03:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2002? 

message: I've heard that a prominent wall street analyst and some other people have made predictions as to what will happen in this years WWDC.  Would that sort of thing belong here? Mathwhiz90601 09:32, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007? 

message: About an hour or two after the World Wide Doveloper's Conference today, I updated the WWDC 07 section with the products and features that Jobs introduced today. Later, someone reverted the change. Just incase you're wondering, the WWDC 07 has already happened. It needed to be updated.
Thanks,
24.3.191.42 20:34, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWDC 2007 

message: As stated above, the WWDC subsection has rumors which have not been verified by Apple. These should be removed until tommorrow, when the conference is held. Jordsta (talk) 05:42, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWDC 08 has rumors, not facts! 

message: Needs to be renamed from "Worldwide Developers Conference" (implies it applies to *ALL* developers) to  "Apple Worldwide Developers Conference"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.170.252.213 (talk) 04:38, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename Article 

message: Several of the references point to stepwise.com. Stepwise.com has been deleted (not just taken offline) so those references now point to a 404.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.36.87.81 (talk) 11:09, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stepwise 

message: Stepwise.com is dead, it appears. I don't know if this is from today, but it certainly came as a shock to me. LeftClicker (talk) 20:18, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stepwise.com References 

message: "In 2004, WWDC 2004 took place from June 28 to July 2." "In 2005, WWDC 2005 took place from June 6 to June 10." "In 2006, WWDC 2006 took place from August 7 to August 11 in Moscone West, San Francisco with the keynote presentation hosted by Steve Jobs." "In 2007, WWDC 2007 took place from June 11 to June 15 in Moscone West, San Francisco with the keynote presentation hosted by Steve Jobs." "In 2008, WWDC 2008 took place from June 9 to June 13 at Moscone West, San Francisco." "In 2009, WWDC 2009 took place from June 8 to June 12 at Moscone West, San Francisco" "WWDC 2010 was held at Moscone West, San Francisco from June 7 to June 11, 2010." "In 2011, WWDC 2011 was held at Moscone West, San Francisco from June 6 to June 10, 2011." "In 2012, WWDC 2012 is scheduled to be held at Moscone West, San Francisco from June 11 to June 15, 2012."
You get my point? :) Shouldn't we put the dates and locations into a table?
109.91.182.215 (talk) 11:59, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur gujamin (talk) 21:44, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repetitive 

message: The "Description" section is marked as lacking of references. The only reference I could find about "All attendees have to sign a non-disclosure agreement covering the sessions and other material handed out at WWDC" is the following:
Content presented at WWDC is subject to your applicable Apple Developer Program agreement(s). Taking photographs, recording video and engaging in any form of live blogging during WWDC sessions is expressly prohibited.
 
Arturotena (talk) 03:49, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That section no longer exists, and I can't see any claim about signing an NDA.  The only section marked with any complaints about references is now the History section, which is marked as having not enough references.  So this issue appears to be resolved. Guy Harris (talk) 05:22, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  References for the "Description" section 

message: This page is a disaster currently. I highly suggest that instead of having a broad "2010s" section, that each event would get their own section on this page. This would simplify it a lot, and make it a pleasant read. More images would be great too. --Pauldunahoo (talk) 20:00, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is still a disaster and in desperate need of citations, at the very least. I have revised as much as I could today, including removal of numerous repeat Wiki links, but a lot of further work is required.--Soulparadox (talk) 08:31, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Break each WWDC into a separate header 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Apple Worldwide Developers Conference. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160311212642/http://businessandleadership.com/technology/news/article/13638/technology/jobs-not-attending-wwdc to http://www.businessandleadership.com/technology/news/article/13638/technology/jobs-not-attending-wwdc
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:20, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There's an NSBezierPath class that draws - you guessed it - "bezier paths", but the only google hits for NSBezier by itself turn out to be just dropping the "Path" part or adding an unnecessary space between the words. And a bezier path was just one thing you could draw in an NSGraphicsContext. I'd fix it, but I don't know what this is actually supposed to be talking about Jamoche (talk) 19:34, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "new object-based graphics layer (NSBezier)" ?