Talk:Edgar Graham

message: This article is obviously not written from a NPOV. I would edit it accordingly, but I don't feel that I am well versed enough on Mr. Graham to do so. Someone really ought to all the same though. --Jt 15:05, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Also added "Repecussions" section.  Plan to add fuller Bio of Graham's earlier political involvement with more radical Unionist groups in the 70's, and some quotes both by Graham and Trimble.  Specific examples of Graham's contested memory being used by Trimble and others.
T L Miles 09:29, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added sourcing 

message: I see someone added a neutrality box to the article.
Anyone care to give a reason?
The NPOV discussion on the talk page goes back to when this was an article about a pop band member who used "Edgar Graham" as a name on liner notes.  It doesn't refer to this article (or subject), so I'm thinking someone slapped the NPOV given the (now redundant) talk page.
I'll check back in a few days to see what people think.
T L Miles 14:55, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was added by vintagekits, an ardent Irish republican, Goodness knows why. See User_talk:Logoistic#.22Murder.22_versus_.22killing.22 - Kittybrewster 15:53, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 NPOV? 

message: I'm not really sure I understand the revision of User:Manchesterbedsit, here.  The clean up of word choice seems reasonable, but the moving of all supporting quotations to the body, the removal of the reflist tag to be replaced with a deprecated tag for refs, the removal of link citations (or just parts of urls), the removal of the summation which was refed, and then the "fact" tag on the part of the lead which refers to the citation he just removed; all this makes me a little suspicious.  I'm sure that there's much that can be improved, and such subjects are always walking a NPOV tightrope, but let's try to build an article acceptable to both communities, or else let's all agree to blank it.  
Some input here which can lead to concensus would be helpful. Thoughts?  T L Miles (talk) 01:00, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Righty.  I may be going out on a limb here, but it looks like the editor refed above (from looking at his three edits, and comparing them to other accounts edits) is a sockpuppet of User:Rms125a@hotmail.com.  This (while unproven, and something I really could care less about persuing) would explain the mangling edits, and utter silence thereafter. I'm not going to revert, as there are two latter edits, but I'm going to restore the citations and sections he blanked, and folks can take it from there. T L Miles (talk) 19:43, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV 2008

message: It appears as if the article is attempting to justify Graham's death at the hands of the IRA.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 13:02, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Biased article

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Edgar Graham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090108171906/http://www.niassembly.gov.uk/record/reports/990715b.htm to http://www.niassembly.gov.uk/record/reports/990715b.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090108180314/http://www.niassembly.gov.uk/record/reports/991129b.htm to http://www.niassembly.gov.uk/record/reports/991129b.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716220324/http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.com/pa/cm199495/cmhansrd/1995-06-12/Debate-3.html to http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.com/pa/cm199495/cmhansrd/1995-06-12/Debate-3.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718025628/http://www.ipjr.net/default.asp?blogID=476 to http://www.ipjr.net/default.asp?blogID=476
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110609191441/http://www.oireachtas-debates.gov.ie/S/0102/S.0102.198312070003.html to http://www.oireachtas-debates.gov.ie/S/0102/S.0102.198312070003.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified