Talk:Teamwork

message: I removed the cleanup tag  after wikifying and revising slightly.  I thought it was a good article and didn't really deserve the cleanup tag unless it was just for wikification, so I tried to tread lightly, but whether or not I achieved that goal, I don't know.  What I do know is that Wikipedia is from what I've seen so far is a pretty good example of teamwork.  Spalding 23:31, Nov 23, 2004 (UTC)
*Wikipedia is a good example of teamwork. Wikipedia in order to have an effective team uses the three most common items needed to have a good team that is sucessful. These items are Training, Communication, and Follow Up. Don't ever get the "It's Not My Job" syndrome. --B Rieckmann 00:23, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is in tough shape.  There seemed to be a lot of material 2 days ago, but I assume it was taken down in accordance with the "Original Research" tag.  I'm going to Wikify what's left. kostmo 05:48, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs work 

message: define viral communication...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.121.204.129 (talk) 18:54, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old comment from 2007

message: Teamwork is 100% involvement of work with team  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.223.163.5 (talk) 06:07, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  teamwork 

message: This article has no citations, and is full of original research. Since this is an encyclopedia, any information included has to be verifiable and have a neutral point of view, so this article would need a total rewrite to agree with Wikipedia's policies. I don't see much of a point in having this article, though; it seems like this page should be turned into a disambiguation page like the one for responsibility, identity, or determination. Besides, articles already exist for team building and team, and teamwork is defined in Wiktionary. --Apollo1758 (talk) 02:45, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research? 

message: I restored the article to a previous version which did NOT read like an essay and, in my opinion, was much better, as it was to the point and contained all it needed to contain.  This page should be combined with Team, but this is the best I can do to make it more encyclopedia-like.  If you find this in error--anyone--do change it.  However, wikipedia is not a place to put your essays, and is a place for information--facts, not research or what you wrote for your High School ethics class.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.217.37.59 (talk) 22:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE: Original Research? 

message: Teamwork is a managers way of saying, "I have more work for you!".  In my case, every time I hear that word, it means that I will be taking on New responsibilities with no additional pay.  But suck it up and be a team player.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.34.140.50 (talk) 11:54, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  TEAM WORK 

message: If you just copied this page it would be a better article. Most people are not looking for academic qualities of teamwork but practical qualities.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.40.209.178 (talk) 18:58, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If you think the article "sucks", improve it! Just don't copy that page since that would be a copyright infringement. Legoktm (talk) 19:02, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

text: My thoughts exactly. It seems like if I fixed it, someone else would just come along and make it suck again. But if you fixed it, I think it could stand a chance. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:17, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article sucks 

message: The definition of teamwork in the beginning of the article should be a general one (perhaps something along the lines of a number of people working with coordinated effort to be able to do something), and not related to healthcare only?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.133.63.212 (talk) 14:15, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely. And without a glaring , right off the bat. Go for it! InedibleHulk (talk) 06:19, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  more general definition needed 

message: Is there a reason for the health care focus?
Also, I flagged this for cleanup.  There's some content there but the article itself is really in need of a rewrite.
-KaJunl (talk) 02:55, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Health care? 

message: Here are the changes I made for this article:
*Made the lead section more concise and clear
*Added a brief "History" section with background information on the emergence of teamwork
*Added the section "Effective Teamwork" 
*Made the "Processes" section clearer
*Added the section "Basic Team Dynamics"
*Added information to the "Training to improve teamwork" section
*Edited the "Drawbacks and Benefits" section
*Cleaned up the Resources section
*Removed section "Types of Team" (thought this belonged to the "Team" wikipedia page)
Overall this page was unclear and had a lot of information that belonged to the "Team" wiki page. There were a lot of grammatical and spelling errors and the format was very confusing. My goal was to add some clarity and structure to the topic as well as make it more focused on general teamwork and not only on the healthcare aspect. 
Eirini Souroulidi (talk) 01:55, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes

message: Was wondering if this would be a useful edition. I was thinking particularly of the teamwork displayed by those in aviation, that of Formula One racing (pitstops), and that of the military. These 3 examples have been lauded by other industries for being efficient and good at minimising human error. Healthcare in particular has started changing its practice by adapting techniques from these examples. Thoughts? 
Jesnan (talk) 01:07, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Addition of a "Notable Examples of Teamwork" section?