Talk:Sexual network

message: Regarding emphasis in areas of this article:
DO NOT UNDO! Important statistical information is relevant to sex education, and the prevention of VD’s such as HIV AIDS! Please keep formating for the sake of International sexual health information.
Please discuss proposed minor changes to formating here.
--Techrontech 12:54, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Formating

message: "There has been a decrease in the number of people having sex with animals outside of marriage." Seems like a pretty clear case of graffiti to me, so I deleted "with animals". JFS24.49.191.211 20:48, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Edits, Touchups & Corrections

message: I removed "for example, it is impossible to catch a disease from someone who caught it after you have ceased to have sex with them, or after they have been completely and effectively treated in such a way as to entirely remove the causative agent of the disease." because it wasn't true. lysdexia 08:35, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is it not true? -- The Anome 09:46, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted

message: This article could possibly include a reference to the diagram which figures throughout the series The L Word. examples here:  via 
Great example. There are already many charts available that describe this same concept. The basic idea is if you have more than once sexual partner, you're exposing each one after your first partner with however many sexual partners your previous partners have been exposed to, and the only way to avoid this is to have only one sexual partner. The quick-fix straight solution: marriage.
To obtain a free copy of one of these charts (which I can't publish due to copyright laws), just call the Option Line at 1-800-395-HELP and ask about it. They can also give you info about sex and sexuality.
Techrontech 13:29, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To be added

message: It is not necessary to make personal comments or conversation anywhere, principally those deemed unnecessary or uncouth. This can be done elsewhere in Wikipedia (such as in the User Talk pages, or areas in the Community Portal). Failure to follow these rules will result in immediate erasure of the text in question.
Sign your posts.  Failure to follow this rule is annoying to your fellow Wikipedians, and makes it difficult if not impossible to follow a discussion or distinguish visitors from established Wikipedians (and by inference, how much value should be given to anything they say).  And ((some would say that)) there is no place in Wikipedia for "...personal comments...deemed unnecessary or uncouth." --Canonblack 13:00, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rules

message: Where is the source that a monogomous sexual relationship cannot result in an unwanted child?Obina 23:19, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  unwanted child 

message: It seems that there must be resources from the past few years that the article can use.--John Bessa (talk) 17:38, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newer material 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sexual network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050130034753/http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/chains.htm to http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/chains.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified