lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:University of Information Technology and Sciences

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://nu-edu-bd.net/university-of-information-technology-sciences/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sam Sailor 11:28, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Quotition and partition

message: In my study of mathematics I have not heard of this term, and the article does not seem to provide a clear and precise definition. If the term is not mathematical, perhaps someone should place it in an appropriate category, and provide more context in the article. --Quux0r 07:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition

message: I thought I would come to a point in this article where it says what quotition is.  It's not there! Michael Hardy (talk) 22:26, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  This page is somewhat clearer. Michael Hardy (talk) 22:34, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  So: WHAT is it??
Talk:Simon Bruté

message: One person two articles. One article should become primary, and the other should become a redirect. Studerby 18:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: I just did some cleanup: merging the text more, adding references to other wikipedia entries, etc. Such is far from complete and I haven't consulted any of the cited sources, much less Michael Pasquier's Fathers on the Frontier: French Missionaries and the Roman Catholic Priesthood in the United States, 1789-1870 published in 2009 by Oxford University Press, which I just found out about and haven't tried to order via inter-library-loan. 
I clicked on this link hoping to learn this missionary bishop's stance on slavery, which was permitted to French settlers (who were grandfathered in that practice by the Northwest Ordinance of 1787), but which was not allowed (and increasingly less tolerated) in the new states of Ohio, Indiana and Illinois, despite considerable controversy citing slaveholding in St. Louis as well as Kentucky. I suspect there was one (or several) Catholic missionaries who helped defeat various proposals to expand slavery northward. In particular I was recently researching what became the first Illinois constitution in 1818 as well as a defeated referendum for a Constitutional Convention in 1824. However, Badin was physically in France at the time, and I can't quickly find the article about the Russian aristocrat who converted to Catholicism and who supposedly is also now being considered for sainthood (whose talk page I edited about a similar Eastern shore connection and this issue maybe a year ago).
I'm somewhat surprised at the lack of scholarship on the topic--the only book I've found thus far and just a couple of weeks ago), was about Black Catholics and written by a benedictine in the 1970s (whose title I used as a reflink that day because I couldn't check it out). It documents how slavery and slaveholding was very controversial within the U.S. Catholic hierarchy in the first half of the 1800s. Of course, they also had to deal with the Know-Nothings and antiCatholicism, which presumably this bishop dealt with and which I hope didn't cause his death.Jweaver28 (talk) 13:20, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: slavery 
Talk:Simon Sinas

message: I think that there's an equal number of sources which describe him as Aromanian or Greek. It's not meaningful to debate ethnicity by counting sources in my opinion. Ethnically, he probably was Aromanian like 2/3 of Moscopole/Voskopojë, but it doesn't mean much in terms of actual self-perception as bibliography describes his life. Thus, I've contextualized the Boolean argument about his ethnicity with the sentence:  I hope that solves all disputes.
*Side comment: Ethnicity is performative. It has real social meaning in the way it's displayed.--Maleschreiber (talk) 21:18, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnic origin and self-belonging
Talk:Theodore Zeldin

message: This article is rather 'glowing' and contains a lot of unsourced praise. It reads more like an editorial profile than a wikipedia entry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.240.83.20 (talk) 15:32, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: According to the conventions used in this article the British Mandate of Palestine should be a place of birth.  According to its entry in Wikipedia the British Mandate of Palestine was a 'legal instrument'.  Did the latter metamorphose into the former?  Or was he born in a 'legal instrument'?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.181.51.91 (talk) 20:28, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Terminology...
Talk:Neocicindela tuberculata

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 05:31, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problem
Talk:Joseph Beecham

message: I've got this article on my to-do list. To conform with the article on Joseph's son, I propose to move this one to "Joseph Beecham" without all the baronet verbiage, if that's OK with other editors. Tim riley (talk) 15:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't it dispense with the "Sir"? All other knights and baronets I'm aware of exclude the word "Sir" in the titles of their articles.  --  ♬ Jack of Oz ♬ [your turn] 01:04, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Title includes "Sir"

message: A very long time ago I planned a major expansion of this article, and then mislaid all my notes. I have now found them, and intend to upload them soon. I agree the article probably needs renaming. MinorProphet (talk) 16:13, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have updated the bibliography in preparation for my update which is at User:MinorProphet/Draft subpages/Joseph Beecham, and which still needs a few tweaks. It is my intention to incorporate a large number of s into the existing referencing style. This will conflict with wp:citevar. Consensus should be reached, and I welcome your comments within, say, seven  days. MinorProphet (talk) 22:42, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extensive update 

message: Although many WP articles about baronets correspond with the general title "Sir X, 1st Baronet", the article Thomas Beecham (Beecham's better-known son, the 2nd Bt.) goes against this practice. I therefore propose to re-name this article Joseph Beecham. MinorProphet (talk) 22:42, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed rename
Talk:Fulakora saundersi

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 08:23, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Giant wētā

message: More than 70 g ? It's not true : see Weta for details. Chaoborus 23:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weigh 

message: Please, refrain from plagiarizing texts. This article is entirely identical to the one found here: http://www.cafeterra.info/2009/02/giant-weta-heaviest-insect-in-world.html The image is the same too. --186.213.118.122 (talk) 02:45, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This article was built up as a result of numerous changes since 2006. Most of these changes occurred while this was a paragraph, and later a section, within the weta article, and it was then split off into this article. The site you link to above appears to have copied the contents of our article as of about June 2009.-gadfium 03:48, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism 

message: The citation used for weta in California is incorrect.  It's a youtube video of a Jerusalem cricket.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.88.222.114 (talk) 18:36, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Have removed. I guess you don't see many in Russia! Martinevans123 (talk) 20:32, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weta in California 

message: This is certainly impossible.
The insect shown on photos at that Macedonian article is a rare species of armoured cricket from subfamily Bradyporinae - Deracantha onos, which is native to southern Eurasia.
It is not so widely known as wetas are, while having a similar appearance. And it is much smaller than wetas, reaching about 60 millimeters in length. 
So the journalists, in their usual ignorant manner, exagerrated the insect's size up to "small rabbit" with "tail 10-15 centimeters long" (which is an ovipositor actually). Even true wetas cannot be THAT big.  
Compare the pics in article with pics of Deracantha onos in Google Image Search: https://www.google.ru/search?q=deracantha+onos&newwindow=1&biw=1366&bih=667&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=2F4MVNyXGOHqyQO7z4CoDw&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ#q=deracantha+onos&newwindow=1&tbm=isch&tbs=isz:l
Article - http://novatv.mk/index.php?navig=8&cat=2&vest=12605
So the link to that 'fake Macedonian weta' should be deleted, and I'll do it right now.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by MegasomaElephas (talk • contribs) 13:31, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weta in Macedonia?
Talk:Tree wētā

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 08:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: I removed the following text from the article:
: The problem with tree weta are that they are by all intents and purposes, undead zombie bugs. When they freeze their blood keeps pumping and their heart and brain die but when they defrost, oh guess what, it starts working again like brand new.
This is both unreferenced and (so it seems to me) written in the wrong tone for an encyclopedia. Because of the previous copyright problems mentioned above, I didn't feel confident enough to revert to a former version of this page, so cut out the lot. Loganberry (Talk) 01:48, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed text 

message: You have to update that article--93.131.103.156 (talk) 12:09, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you be specific, and maybe point to a source? —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 22:25, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  No diffrence between wetas with claws and no claws?
Talk:Motuweta

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 22:57, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:Thomas Gilovich

message: Having reviewed this for DYK and being really impressed with it, I have some other suggestions for taking this article further up the quality scale:
* Be careful of peacock terms, such as using "key" as an adjective.
* Technical terms should be italicised on first appearance: no need to put them in quotes.
* Some of the descriptions of Gilovich's research say that he "showed that...". It would be better to say what the research was, i.e. to describe the experiment, since experiments can be interpreted more than one way, and although Gilovich is a mainstream researcher, there is not necessarily consensus agreement on all his interpretations. This is especially true, for example, of the section on Anchoring. The question to be answered is, "what research did Gilovich do?" not just "how did he interpret the results?" The paragraph on Illusion of transparency is much better in this regard.
* Clustering illusion and Hot hand fallacy are both closely related to the Representativeness heuristic. Hopefullly there's a source that makes the connection and the link can be mentioned in the paragraphs.
* Awards and recognition: ideally, we'd have a table including the years when these awards were made.
* Do we know who Gilovich's doctoral advisor was? Not a high priority, but ideally it would be nice to have this in the infobox.
* House style: consistently avoid first-person language. Psychologists study what people do, not what "we" do.
Some of these are quite minor points, but if we address them, I think this article could get very high on the quality scale. Cheers,
MartinPoulter (talk) 12:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  More suggestions for improving this article
Talk:Thalmann Battalion

message: Is there a reason for the name being "Thalmann Battalion" and not "Thälmann Battalion"? -- Hestemand 19:09, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Only to make it easier (1) to spell for non-literati and non-polyglotti; (2) to find via Search engines and (3) to remember for the future for Anglophones. The tradition / usual rule in English (I pass no judgment on this, I'm merely reporting) is to drop accents. The older literature calls it Thaelmann, by the way; the newer ones Thalmann. Thälmann is probably what I'd use in private correspondence but I think I'd stick with Thalmann for popular publication. Roger 19:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

text: No, you're right. For future reference, the umlaut should be retained as it shows how the word is pronounced. For a popular take of this, Googling produces the following numbers of hits: Thalmann, 58,000; Thaelmann, 65,000; Thälmann, 809,000. I'll cut and paste the contents into Thälmann Battalion and turn this into a REDIRECT page. Roger 05:14, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name
Talk:Lenggong

message: There is a contradiction in dates regarding the disbandment of the Tampan site. It says about it is about 30,000 years ago that Supervolcano Toba erupted, but it should be 70,000 years ago.
I think there should be separate article for Perak Man, etc. The article should be mainly about Lenggong only. kawaputratorque 10:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates of site disbandment 

message: It is clear that the Archaeology section was edited by several editors that did not read each other edits. For example: the section starting with "The Lenggong Valley in upper Perak, is an important archaeological site", that should have started the whole Archaeology section, is partly a repetition of the previous section and also a contradiction to the statements in the previous section "The two exceptions are the Kota Tampan and Bukit Jawa sites. These two are Peninsular Malaysia's only Palaeolithic sites." because it list two other sites (Kampung Gelok and Kampung Temelong) from the Palaeolithic period. So the whole section should be seriously edited. This statement about "Peninsular Malaysia's only Palaeolithic sites.", which is repeated twice in the article, is also wrong because a Paleolithic site was found in Kedah (Stone tools from Paleolithic era unearthed in Malaysian caves).  Also, the statement about Bujang Valley is irrelevant to the article about Lenggong. אביהו (talk) 06:38, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy
Talk:T. H. Marshall

message: How come that he was "a civilian prisoner in Germany during World War One" (1914-18) but seemingly at the same time: "From 1914-18 he was a Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge and then joined the LSE as a lecturer between 1919-25"? 77.180.247.245 (talk) 10:07, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sir William Congreve, 1st Baronet

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
Barely a Start class.
Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips  for writing better articles. -- Yamara 18:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment
Talk:Huberia striata

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 21:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Huberia brounii

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 21:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Heteroponera brouni

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 22:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 