Talk:Thomas Fuller (architect)

message: Gothic revival architecture seems to have been applied by default to Fuller's buildings, but in building after building, one can see from main articles or WP:RS that that is not always or even usually the case. I've made one correction. There is more work to do this regard, though, so I think it should be tagged as such until the problem is corrected -- so readers are not misled. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:22, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the Library bulding to Victorian High Gothic style. Are there others you feel should be changed or can we remove the banner?— Rod talk 12:45, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Boy, this is a fluke. I stopped watching this page and came here as a result of work I'm now doing on Wikidata. Anyway, Rod, imo, no, the tag should remain. I don't have time to go through all the suspect links but one of the 1st ones I've checked, the Almonte post office, was wrong: the historic sites designation makes it clear it's Romanesque revival. Until someone can vet all of User:Victoriaedwards' edits here, the tag should remain, imo. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:09, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I checked two more, going to the historic places pages, and they're both wrong. sorry I cannot help more. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:24, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Today, I corrected more buildings wrongly labeled per their architectural styles. I think they're all correct, save for the Royal Military College. Of course, the mess also affects the RMC main article, which I've raised at Talk:Royal Military College of Canada#Accuracy. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:52, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your work on improving the accuracy. You suggest all are now correct except the RMC. I have looked at the Heritage Character Statement for this and am still unsure what to change it to in this article for the three RMC buildings - what would you suggest?— Rod talk 10:13, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have any suggestions, sorry. Please do as you think best -- leave the tag on the page or remove it. thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:39, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: At the moment all three lines in the table for the RMC say "Neo-Gothic" - never having seen them it is difficult to try to put better labels. The riding establishment heritage character statement you linked to doesn't give a particular architectural style. I've also looked at the Historic Register details for Royal Military College of Canada Building 2, Building 3, Building 6 etc and they seem to be quite eclectic styles rather than all following a particular scheme, so I'm at a bit of a loss as to how to describe them. How about replacing "neo-gothic" with a "?" for those three entries?— Rod talk 20:55, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. No, we don't do placeholders in article texts, here. Just remove the text from those fields, leave them blank, with an edit summary that explains why, is my suggestion. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:09, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: OK thanks. I've done as you suggested. If anyone objects they will hopefully come here to discuss.— Rod talk 07:54, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Factual accuracy

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Thomas Fuller (architect). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070422093100/http://www.collectionscanada.ca/structures/parliament/ to http://www.collectionscanada.ca/structures/parliament/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151007165413/http://www.wordimage.ca/files/fuller.pdf to http://www.wordimage.ca/files/fuller.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:29, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
* 
You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:06, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion