lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cozumel fox

message: The IUCN Red List Status of this article is not according to IUCN/SSC, who has faild to include this species which is not yet described. Thus the correct status is NE (Not Evaluated)! Tbjornstad 09:24, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  IUCN Red List Status 

message: Given that this specimen has not been identified other than belonging to the genus Urocyon - nobody claims that it is a species apart from this Wikipedia article - I propose that the content of this article be relocated under the genus Urocyon and this article changed into a redirect. I shall wait one week for receiving comments from interested editors. William Harristalk 04:03, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move of text
Talk:Terry and Gerry

message: The original release date of this album was 1985. The article reads like it was 2007. --Gereon K. (talk) 06:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's Get the Hell Back To Lubbock 
Talk:Industry in Brazil

message: Facts about Brazil:
::5th most populous country
http://geography.about.com/cs/worldpopulation/a/mostpopulous.htm
::Biggest beef producer and has 207 million cattle
http://www.theherald.co.uk/business/farming/display.var.2217242.0.EU_and_ethanol_ease_threat_from_Brazilian_beef.php
::3rd biggest chicken meet producer and has 4.6 billion chickens
http://www.apexbrasil.com.br/eng/noticia_detalhe.aspx?idnot=75
http://www.animalethics.org.uk/aec-c-chickens-entries.html
::2nd biggest exporter of agricultural products
http://www.ncseonline.org/NLE/crs/abstract.cfm?NLEid=1762
::Biggest coffee producer
http://www.coffeeresearch.org/coffee/brazil.htm
::2nd biggest iron ore producer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_ore
::2nd biggest soybean producer
http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=33652
::Biggest sugarcane producer
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v444/n7120/full/444670a.html
::6th largest uranium reserves
http://www.inb.gov.br/english/reservasBrasil.asp
::3rd biggest bauxite producer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bauxite
::5th biggest manganese producer
http://www.manganese.org/production.php
::3rd biggest corn producer
http://www.grains.org/page.ww?section=Barley%2C+Corn+%26+Sorghum&name=Corn
⇨ EconomistBR ⇦ Talk 20:39, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Useful links about Brazil

message: I suggest taking a look at Economy of the Empire of Brazil under section "Industry". Not only the industrial sector grew during the monarchy, but it also received incentive from the Government. - --Lecen (talk) 19:30, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake about no incentive during the Empire
Talk:That Petrol Emotion

message: Any ideas 86.16.103.169 (talk) 11:23, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engineering by radiohead seems to have very similar guitar riff to one of that petrol tunes
Talk:The Servants

message: im not sure how to go about editing wikipedia, thats an exercise im leaving until after my exams, but in the meantime could someone add that the Sin City theme song is by the Servants. I think thats something of note as it is probably one of few songs by them that has garnered real attention. Then again, i might be wrong and it might be merely Trivia. 122.148.151.146 13:12, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably a different band called 'The Servants', I would guess.--Michig 13:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, see The Servant (band). Hoof Hearted (talk) 14:01, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Who wrote this? Some wannabe journo I'm guessing; the tone is completely unencyclopedic. Awful!
83.71.4.109 (talk) 18:22, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone
Talk:Pale fox

message: 1.8–2.7 kg? But 2–3.6 kg, 1.0-1.5 kg. "and the pale fox is able to relocate southwards and northwards in relation to the periodic droughts that affect these regions"- the cited source does not says that. 1826, 1827. --NGC 54 (talk | contribs) 13:06, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: — Assignment last updated by Montanagal101 (talk) 03:29, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Principles of Biology 2
Talk:Tibetan fox

message: This article really needs a photograph of this highly distinctive animal, can anyone provide?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:543:C001:FE13:B904:6BD1:6C35:C316 (talk) 03:35, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo again 

message: Hi, User:William Harris: as is evident by the referenced sources, most authors referred to it with the common name Tibetan fox, except Pocock (1941). I therefore suggest moving the page to Tibetan fox. What do you think? -- BhagyaMani (talk) 11:41, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello BhagyaMani, I fully concur with you. I do not believe that one reference using this name nearly 80 years ago is valid as a "commoname" today. Wozencraft also refers to it as "Tibetan sand fox" on page 584 of MSW3, however he was following on from Pocock. Google Books shows the two forms are used equally, I prefer the simplicity of the name "Tibetan fox". William Harristalk 11:49, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Then I think we can also delete the 2nd paragraph after the move, and replace it by some more meaningful info, e.g. summarising content provided in the other sections. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 11:54, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. William Harristalk 11:56, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

text: I tried moving, but the page named 'Tibetan fox' already exists. So it will be necessary to use Requested moves to ask for the page to be moved. Do you want to do that? Or shall we wait a day or so for others to comment? -- BhagyaMani (talk) 12:00, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just about to say the same thing you posted first. I will propose a move below. William Harristalk 12:02, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name
Talk:Violet gland

message: Do dogs ever have this gland?  I can find no reference to it, but there are very few wolf features which never occur in dogs.--Richard New Forest 18:29, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Some further research...  It seems it's normally called the supracaudal gland, and although some sources () say dogs don't have it, it is clear from others (, ) that they do.  I wonder if some dogs don't have it – is it perhaps an adult wolf feature which does not develop in more neotenous dog breeds?  --Richard New Forest (talk) 22:57, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Violet gland in dogs? 

message: The last sentence is incorrect (that the gland is sometimes known as stud tail). Stud tail is the name of a condition in which the gland becomes swollen or blocked.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.141.176.61 (talk) 14:07, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in article
Talk:Vulpes

message: There is also a page Fox; probably should be merged, under one page with the common name as the heading. Snowman (talk) 21:44, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: The "Tamed Silver Fox" is called the "Domesticated Silver Fox" in all other areas.  Trythisonyourpiano (talk) 21:51, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tamed/Domesticated Silver Fox 

message: Both in the Extant species section and in the Early history section, there is mention of four fossil species yet the section of fossil species lists 6 species.
No idea which is accurate yet I think something should be changed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.176.97.27 (talk) 17:51, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fossil Species 

message: Is "canis vulpes" in the infobox a typo? I assume it is because "red fox" lists it as "Vulpes vulpes", but it's listed as "Canis vulpes" in the source. InfoManiac297 (talk) 17:27, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a typo. "Canis vulpes" is used when referring to the type species, as, in taxonomy, you always refer to the type species of a genus as it was originally formally described, even if it has now been synonymized into a different binomial. Mr Fink (talk) 18:33, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canis vulpes
Talk:Side-striped jackal

message: In the English language, the names of species/types of animals are NOT capitalized. 
Exceptions include the Douglas fir, Tasmanian devil, Siberian tiger, and Norway rat.
Otherwise, they are written like this: grizzly bear, bottlenosed dolphin, blue whale,  potato, carrot, white-tailed deer. 
Hence, the title of this article needs to be Side-striped jackal, with the capital "S" capitalized only because it is the first word of the title of this Wipipedia article.
98.67.110.23 (talk) 22:27, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name of this article 

message: Given the growing number of papers supporting a rename of this species from genus Canis to genus Lupulella including the Canid Specialist Group, and that the Mammal Diversity Database of the American Society of Mammalogists also supports Lupulella with WP:MAMMALS supporting the use of this database as a more up-to-date source than MSW3 in its WP:WikiProject Mammals#Guidelines, I have renamed the genus of this species from Canis to Lupulella as a WP:BOLD edit. Happy to discuss. William Harris (talk) 10:29, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genus change - Canis to Lupulella
Talk:Borophaginae

message: Cynodictis article says they were around from 40 Ma but this article did state 32 Ma I changed it. Walking with Beasts also has them at 40Ma, can we get a review on this? Enlil Ninlil 21:51, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date
Talk:Epicyon

message: I'm rather confused by this. It says that Epicyon was 37 inches at the shoulder, however according to the Wikipedia article on the gray wolf, Canis lupus is 32 inches (that's 2.6 feet!) at the shoulder, and I distinctly remember reading somewhere that Epicyon was supposed to be as large as a brown bear. I don't remember the link to the site where I saw that, but the page on Borophagines in general does say that it was bear-sized (perhaps this was taken from Lioncrusher). Why compare Epicyon's size to an (apparently rather small) bear, if it is only five inches taller than the gray wolf? 71.217.114.221 06:25, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Update - According to http://www.darbycreekpublishing.com/book_pages/wilddogs.htm Epicyon was 12 feet long and 1,800 pounds. So it far surpassed the living wolf at least in its other dimensions. 71.217.114.221 02:29, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Similar in proportions to a mastiff? You have a source for that? 70.213.43.203 (talk) 23:04, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height 37 inches? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Deborah Devos (talk) 00:30, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Animal Physiology
Talk:Greek Expeditionary Force (Korea)

message: This is just the start. There's a lot of work to be done, more research, better organization, more links and references, etc. wbfergus 20:04, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start of the article 

message: I'm a bit concerned with a sentence in the 'Battalion timeline' section, 1951: "January 16: Remnants sweeping operation at Wolaksan, Haseoksan, Munsusan and Sinseol summits."
One of my dictionaries defines 'remmnants' as: "small remaining quantity, or piece or number". The impression given is that the survivors of some action carried out a 'sweeping operation' on some hills - and I don't think that was the original intention.
A better description might be: 'elements of the battalion conducted a sweeping operation ...'. 
By the way, what is a 'sweeping operation'?
I know one is not meant to alter quotes (and I include citations), but I was sorely tempted when I noticed in the 'Awards and recognitions' section "during the period 17 June to 18 June" and then not half a line later "...on the evening of June 17" !
What do other editors think?
RASAM (talk) 21:52, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Remmnants and dates
Talk:Camara (social enterprise)

message: Just for the record, I'm involved with Camara and I went on the summer 2006 trip (and I'm logged in now). Ebelular 20:05, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An unregisted editor has rewritten this article with the following edit summary:
:The changes made to this page were to reflect the organisation with updated information. A lot of the information was out of date and did not reflect the organisation as it is presently. We have also won many new awards since this page was last updated
This summary indicates that the editor has a close connection with the subject of the article, and that this edit was in breach of the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guidelines. Please see also Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.
I will revert this edit because of this, and also because the new text cites no sources other than the Camara home page.
If you connected with Camara then please discuss the problems with the article on this talk page, and give sources to enable the article to be improved. Do not edit the article yourself, but rely on other editors to do so. Alternatively, see Wikipedia:Contact us - Subjects. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:33, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Recent edits to this page appear to have been made with a conflict of interest. A series of edits have recently been made by user:Camara Education. This user was blocked by  as having an unacceptable username, with a notice about promotional editing on the user's talkpage. On the same day a new account  was created, which was used to perform similar edits to the article. The edits appear to made with a conflict of interest, most are sourced to the organisation's website, and the two accounts have only been used to edit this article. Because of this I will remove most or all of the new additions that are only sourced to the Camara website. Verbcatcher (talk) 16:05, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest editing
Talk:As-Saaffat

message: The hadith on the merit of reciting sura as-saaffat should have a reference to the hadith collection in which it appears - indeed, it should be moved to the Wikipedia entry for that hadith collection with only a link from here. If someone doesn't do this soon i'll delete it from this page. Glyns 20:07, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: I'm fairly sure that "loosing hold of feet" should be "losing hold of feet" but this isn't my subject. comments please. ϢereSpielChequers 22:41, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: loosing losing

message: he was a prophet 109.161.216.11 (talk) 13:53, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ILYAS
Talk:Billinge Hospital

message: I can't believe that the edit war on this is going on after how many weeks!  Please do not remove citeable sources.  Add detail about the other hospitals, don't remove cited sources.  I have reverted this. Regan123 20:10, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Maternity facilities

message: There is no need to specifiy the five boroughs.  They can be found in the wikilink. I have reverted this. Regan123 20:10, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 5 Boroughs

message: Does anyone have any photos to add of Billinge Hospital during demoition and since demotition to add to the site...as an ex-pat Billinger and Billinge Hospital baby it would be interesting (and probably sad) for me to see these and a useful addition to the article. Darkieboy236 09:47, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New Photos
Talk:Tote Gote

message: I spent several hours editing descriptions pertaining to the "Tote Gote" to match manufacturer's data. (I own a Nova Tote Gote.  I have good access to all the manufacturer's data, and for  many years hosted my own very popular website pertaining to Tote Gotes). I also made an attempt to clean up this Wikipedia site, going over it several times to improve continuity, correct grammar and spelling errors. When I finished, I clicked on the save button, but was informed the connection had timed out.... On reloading of the site I noticed none of the changes I had made appeared. I had saved a copy of the changes I made to my desk top. I attempted to send the changes again in the same manner, but had no success. Your help to complete the submission of the edited text is appreciated.
-- Novarider. Novarider 03:27, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh, since Novarider's account no longer exists, I guess we'll never know what his intentions were.  —QuicksilverT @ 19:23, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing the Tote Gote page 

message: How is this true? 2601:283:4501:3850:347D:B96A:2BAA:632D (talk) 13:59, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: How is what true?  Chaheel Riens (talk) 14:21, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is this true? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 12:51, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is this true?
Talk:Johnny Castaway

message: The more I think about it, the more I think it would be better if this were a Screen Antics page rather than a Johnny Castaway page, since the page is more focused on the actual screen saver than the main character. --Quesodood 20:12, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Screen Antics Page?
Talk:Thomas Arbuthnot (ship)

message: Please not this page contains circular referencing  - that is references also written by an author of this age. Giano 11:48, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: "Probably named after"
On what basis, beyond the same name, and the assertion of the creator of the reference? Tearlach 01:04, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed

message: What happened to this vessel? - Kittybrewster  ☎ 10:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fate

message: This section was moved from article to talk because it contains too much trivia. RJFJR (talk) 15:57, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Ligusticum porteri

message: Currently, working on this page as part as my Conservation Biology class at University of Washington, Bothell.Lynnbear (talk) 20:24, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starting to make edits 

message: Is Osha the same as Meum_athamanticum? Osha = Ligusticum porteri (Apiaceae).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by VisualBeo (talk • contribs) 21:22, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Meum_athamanticum]] 

message: I’m concerned that a search for “white snake root“ leads to Ligusticum porteri whose entry does not mention “ white snake root“ while Ageratina altissima which is commonly known as “white snake root” cannot apparently be directly found in Wikipedia by searching this common name, “ white snake root“. 2601:187:C080:2320:306D:D717:1AF3:7A47 (talk) 01:50, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  “ white snake root“ : Possible conflation of Ligusticum porteri with Ageratina altissima
Talk:X-wave

message: Added references to recent articles and books.Claudioconti (talk) 19:14, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Queen Elizabeth's Men

message: Am I right in thinking that the common name for this Company was 'The Queen's Men', not 'Queen Elizabeth's Men'? I have never heard of the latter designation.Colin4C 20:23, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Queen's Men 

message: http://mrshakespeare.typepad.com/mrshakespeare/shakespeares_contemporaries/ provides a beginning for the search for members of this company. SmithBlue (talk) 03:17, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Members
Talk:John A. Burbank

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 22:32, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag
Talk:Bill Miner

message: I'm curious how the article doesn't seem to know where he went or what he did after escaping the BC Penitentiary, but it has an exact date of death.  Surely if they know the date of death, they at least know whether he was in the US or Canada at that time? Ptomblin (talk) 13:38, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Working on it.--Auric  talk 12:30, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Death? 

message: It heppens that I went to elementary school in Silverdale (that's middle school in the US) and when I saw the bit:
:Some speculate that Miner left a hidden cache of loot in the forests south of Silverdale after the first robbery.  Some believe he used these funds to fund his escape, while others surmise that there is still hidden loot to be found there.
That's news to me as it 's a famous story locally.  And "in the woods south of Silverdale", meaning south of where the robbery took place I guess, are on the other side of the Fraser River; I know the spot the robbery happened, at teh east end of Silverdale Flats; there's only a few dozen yards, if that, between the river and the dyke that is also where the CPR tracks are.  "in the woods around Silverdale, maybe, as Silverdale is pretty large.  But not south of it, unless they had a boat ready to cross the river with.  Whoever added that, please line-cite it and also explain what's meant, as right now the wording is an impossibility...unless a boat is involved.....Skookum1 (talk) 01:49, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Buried loot at Silverdale??

message: The name George Edwards (or was it Ralph Edwards), his alias, is not mentioned in the article, though it's in various sources.  Why is that?  Never actually heard the "Ezra Allen" part before....I thought "Miner" was the alias, not the birth-name.....Skookum1 (talk) 05:41, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Ezra Allen Miner" vs George Edwards

message: Bowling Green being Miner's place of birth is dubious. This only crops up in modern sources. Contemporary sources all give Jackson County as his birthplace.--Auric  talk 20:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bowling Green
Talk:Panathenaic amphora

message: The 0.25% survival rate of Panathenaic amphora presumably only applies to valuable, prestigious ceramics that were used as grave goods, and certainly can't be generalized to all Greek pottery, such as corseware in everyday use. This point needs to be made, as well as a citation for the figures. Catsmeat (talk) 19:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Survival Rate
MediaWiki talk:Mainpage

message: Should redirect this page to Special:Allmessages. AQu01rius (User • Talk) 20:37, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not clear what that means, but redirecting MediaWiki:Mainpage, MediaWiki talk:Mainpage or Main Page to Special:Allmessages are all bad ideas IMO. --ais523 09:48, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Can someone change the edit so that it says "Main Page" instead of Main page, as Main page is only a redirect. Thank you! Cassie Puma (talk) 00:17, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 00:57, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry about that Tim, it should change back soon, I think. Prodego talk 00:13, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering why I suddenly got a redirect message when clicking "main page" in the sidebar. I thought maybe somebody had been overly bold and attempted to move the page out of main space. - auburnpilot talk 00:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it really should have cleared by now. Might be a bug. And, I would like the main page to stay right where it is, none of this portal stuff.  Prodego talk 01:02, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected Edit 

message: I want to change the page content: to ‘Main Page’ to ‘Wikipedia:Main Page’.
Reason: If ‘Main Page’, the Main Page count as article.  15:17, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes