lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gurgenidze (noble family)

message: As far as I know it was a Georgian noble family came from the southern Georgian province of Samtskhe. And this family is known more earlier than in XVIII century.--Serafita (talk) 17:41, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, Serafita. Ioane Bagrationi's account seems to be a bit inaccurate. I'd be very grateful if you could provide more precise info. Best, --KoberTalk 17:44, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Kober, at the moment I haven’t sources to quote from precise, sadly. But I can give you an information: According the inscription in the asomtavruli script on the church of Tsunda (წუნდა) the name of family of Gurgenidze is first mentioned in the 12th-century. The inscription reports that the Tsunda church was built by the hand of Ichkit-Gurgenis-dze (იჩქით გურგენის–ძე) in 12th-century. It is scientific proved. And one point must be made more precise: I wrote that it was a noble family in Samtskhe. The ancient city Tsunda belonged to Javakheti. So this noble family came from Javakheti or from Meskheti in general.--Serafita (talk) 07:09, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Great. Thanks for valuable info, Serafita. Btw, I have just looked into Cyril Toumanoff's list of Georgian nobility and found the following: "Gurgenidze... presumably descended from the Gurgenids or Khornabuzheli, Princes and Dukes of Khornabuzhi in the 11th-14th centuries." These Khornabujeli are the very same Kakhetian family as Kolonkelisdze/Makhatlisdze. It would be great if we could clarify whether the Meskhian and Kakhetian Gurgenidzes are the same family or not. Cheers, --KoberTalk 16:05, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: P.S. Ichkit also appears to be commemorated in the Vani caves inscription.--KoberTalk 16:13, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that’s right! Have you already seen them? As long as I have the chance I look into appropriate sources. By the way, I know the people with name Gurgenidze claim they are descendants of Racha (რაჭა). To be honest I wondered I heard about this. I hope we can clarify this issue soon and easily. Best! --Serafita (talk) 13:13, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mauricio Funes

message: I'm sorry, I'm new to Wikipedia, so I'm not familiar with proper syntax, etc. This page is in need of some dire help: For starters, there are no references. What do I do to start editing? How do I mark a page as needing references?
losrivas (talk) 15:37, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Hi. I have two sources saying he went into exile in 2016. One that specifies that it was September 2016. So I changed the year from 2014 to 2016. Thanks. Alexysun (talk) 21:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed the year of when he went into exile
Talk:Seth Kimbrough

message: I think there should be a page dedicated to Misery Chastain. Mrfimo (talk) 08:22, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misery Chastain 

message: Per the Wikipedia policy on biographies of living persons, I have removed statements about names of his family members, since they were tagged as needing references and no references were provided. I could not find verification of the claimed family members. The name of a reported son had previously been changed from one name to another, inviting suspicion. Do not re-add names of family members without a reliable source. Edison (talk) 19:26, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Family

message: Mortal Treason wasn't deathcore. Their first album is Metalcore and the second is Melodic Death Metal.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.248.1.87 (talk) 20:58, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre
Talk:Robert Buchanan (footballer, born 1867)

message: There is little firm evidence for his date of death:
:Holley & Chalk's The Alphabet of the Saints says that he died in the first quarter of 1909.
:Arsenal - The Football Facts and Arsenal Who's Who, both give the year as 1907, as does www.allfootballers.com
:The Scottish FA site states that he "was dead before 1930"
:The London Hearts site gives the date of death as 1930.
In the absence of any firmer evidence, the article gives the date of death as 1907.  --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 22:30, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of death
Talk:Home Alone (The Boondocks)

message: I gotta know. What's the song that plays right after the theme song? As huey is speaking. It sounds kinda soul like. It's been in several episodes  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.195.5.222 (talk) 00:59, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Adagio for Strings by Sam Barber.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.224.18.8 (talk) 17:53, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: At the end, when Granddad gets home (while Riley and Huey are knocked out on the floor), Riley is wearing the orange suit Huey made him wear. However, when Granddad heads up the stairs, Riley is seen wearing his usual undershirt --66.67.187.203 (talk) 04:58, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oversight 

message: Anyone else see parallels with the novel Lord of the Flies ? It became apparent to me at the end when Robert gets home and Huey and Riley instantly revert to being kids again instead of fighting. It perfectly mimics the end of LOTF where Jack and the hunters are about to kill Ralph, and the naval officer arrives just in time. All the kids then revert back to kids instead of savages and begin crying.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mistershirt (talk • contribs) 21:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  LOTF?
Talk:Bavaria Solarpark

message: Solarpark Mühlhausen must have closed. It apparently opened in 2005. But now, in mid-2010, there is no sign of it in the satellite photo on Google Maps. See map coordinates:  49.15859, 11.434128. Instead there is just a field of crops. 87.143.174.36 (talk) 11:19, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Peshawar High Court

message: I believe the "List Of Chief Justices Peshawer High Court" section should be removed because it has a separate page. List Of Chief Justices Peshawer High Court should stand on its own and be listed in "See also" instead. Astapor12 (talk) 20:51, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  List Of Chief Justices Peshawer High Court
File talk:VonMaurOmaha.jpg

message: I took this picture with a camera phone. Therefore it is mine and I release all rights to it. I does not need to be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Code36 (talk • contribs) 08:11, 16 December 2007 
:The image has been moved to Commons, so there's no need for a page for it here. It can be used here the same way as before, but this way it can be used by other Wikimedia projects as well. —Angr If you've written a quality article... 13:28, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Puerto Rico v. Branstad

message: Is it right to say that Puerto Rico v. Branstad "overrules" Kentucky v. Dennison, or rather that it "reverses" it, much as Brown v. Board of Education reverses Plessy v. Ferguson?  75.201.204.249 (talk) 03:22, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology
Talk:List of countries by coal production

message: A discussion has been started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries/Lists of countries which could affect the inclusion criteria and title of this and other lists of countries.  Editors are invited to participate. Pfainuk talk 12:36, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Discussion 

message: The percentage of wild production figures are incompatible with the actual production figures given. (In many instances a lower absolute production is given as being a greater proportion of world production.) These errors are replicated at Coal. Lavateraguy (talk) 17:25, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Note added. Shares are not erroneous, but they are not based on shown production. But it is possible to recalculate it using shown production values. --Jklamo (talk) 15:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  This list is inconsistent
Talk:Trier of fact

message: The proposed merger with question of law never got off the ground so I am removing the tag.  Anyway trier of fact is a separate issue.Zymurgy (talk) 20:41, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: Perhaps a rename/re-title of this article to include something like "(US Jurisprudence)" or something would be good, since it's about that. BThetford (talk) 22:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  USA-Specific
Talk:Văn Hiến University

message: This claim and, in fact, the entire section, lack citations, leaving me to question whether these titles are indeed individual universities or actually in reference to divisions of one of the preceding universities. The source provided on the article doesn't seem to provide any pertinent information. Ludicrous (talk) 00:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  University of Economics, University of Sociology and Humanity.
Talk:Play It Again, Sam (film)

message: So the article says, " The film was directed by Herbert Ross, which is unusual, as Allen usually directs all his own written work." I tightened up by remove the "which is unusual..." part of the sentence, since a quick look at his filmography shows he's directed about 2/3 of them, which doesn't make Ross being the director particularly unusual; in fact, when he did this movie, he had directed fewer than half of them. I got reverted; I still don't think the phrase is at all necessary. --jpgordon::==( o ) 23:50, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's actually very unusual. Out of the dozens of films he's written, Allen has directed all but two of them. - Gothicfilm (talk) 00:07, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ok then "unusual"
Talk:Wales International Academy of Voice

message: Please see Wikipedia:Not. A Wikipedia article is not the place to advertise your organization, its future events, and its fundraising schemes. This is inappropriate for an encyclopedia article and has been deleted. There is a link to the official web site of the Cardiff International Academy of Voice and that is sufficient for readers who wish to find out more about it. Similarly, it is inappropriate to list alumni unless they are noteworthy in their own right. Welcome additions to the article would be coverage in independent published sources, as well as public domain images. Voceditenore (talk) 18:41, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: November 19, 2008 edits
Talk:HMS Punjabi

message: I'm confuser: the pennant nimber in the article's title is F21, however in the picture that illustrates it it can clearly be seen C21.  Which one is correct? Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 08:47, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not that clearly apparently, it's G21 in the photograph :) She was commissioned with pennant number F21, but this was changed to G21 in May 1940 for visual signalling purposes, so both are correct. Benea (talk) 09:13, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Gee, I'll have to use my glasses again! ;) Thanks for the clarification, I'm not sure what the letter indicates. Obviously it's not indicating "type", as happens in the US (and othe rmodern) Navy. Cheers, DPdH (talk) 08:28, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually in a way it is ;) The wartime navy used the letters D and F until 1940 to identify destroyers. These were then reassigned to larger capital ships, which had previously not borne a pennant superior (i.e. the letter), just a number (or occasionally the letter I). G, H and I were then brought in for the fleet destroyers, and L for escort destroyers. The RN just did it sequentially as opposed to the US which took the initial letter of the ship type, allocating C for cruisers, BB for battleships, etc. Benea (talk) 08:55, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pennant number
Talk:Juan Ángel Almendares Bonilla

message: I have removed the WP:NOTE and Unverified tags that were previously inserted on this article. I added information with four new citations. Enough information and notability on Almendares exists to expand this article beyond a stub. I will continue to work on it, and please contribute any help or feedback. Thanks, Clearstreams17 (talk) 01:15, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub Status 
Category talk:Illawarra Hawks players

message: This category has been created and all historical players (under "Category:Woolongong Hawks players") moved to the new name.  Per category naming convention, players who played under the old name (Woolongong Hawks) should carry the old team name, only those who played under the name "Illawarra Hawks" should carry that category. There is a ton of consensus around this, most recently Melbourne Tigers/Melbourne United. Rikster2 (talk) 21:26, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There has been no activity on this discussion so I nested the previous name category as per convention.  When I have time I will parse out players into the correct categories. Rikster2 (talk) 09:44, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming convention
Talk:HMS Neptune (1874)

message: This article is using the inflation template, which is totally unsuitable for the purpose. Indeed, the template page says this. Can this be fixed? There are websites out there somewhere which provide the necessary info and could be used as a cite. - Sitush (talk) 08:11, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inflation 

message: The picture used is clearly of an earlier, fully-rigged HMS Neptune - while this article is about an early iron-clad battleship with no masts and turrets. I am not sure how to correct it - nor where to find a correct image, but that does need to be done.Wymspen (talk) 12:33, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The picture is correct; read the article more carefully.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:01, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Titles Deprivation Act 1917

message: : In addition, due to Salic Law, neither Victoria nor her descendents could ascend to the throne of the Kingdom of Hanover. As such the throne of Hanover went to her uncle Ernest Augustus and his male descendents.
The relevance of this passage, I suspect, is not obvious to the uninitiated; so I radically rewrote it.  —Tamfang (talk) 09:48, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salic Law 

message: : The Titles Deprivation Act 1917 ... authorised enemies ... to be deprived of their British peerages and royal titles.
I'm not happy with this use of 'authorised': it seems to say that the Act allowed such persons to choose to be deprived! —Tamfang (talk) 23:51, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  authorisation 

message: Should we mention MP Bob Seely's coming proposed amendment to the act, concerning the current Duke of Sussex? GoodDay (talk) 15:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Random backbencher proposes something that nobody's heard of and we don't even mention on the page about him? DuncanHill (talk) 15:57, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed amendment to the Titles Deprivation Act
Talk:Liptovský Hrádok

message: Cleaned up the article to better meet Wikipedia's quality standards, though someone with better knowledge of Slovak than I may want to add more to this. Demokratickid (talk) 20:07, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Talk:List of world's largest airlines by fleet

message: In the old list UTair Aviation with 216 aircraft was listed, however, this is now missing in this list. Can someone explain why this is the case? --Russavia (talk) 20:48, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume it is because 182 of UTair's fleet are helicopters mainly used in the oil industry, not for commercial passengers and therefore not included in this list. According to their website, they have 132 airplanes which is not enough to make the top 20.Ozzieboy (talk) 14:53, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  UTair removed? 

message: I have removed the table at the top of the article, adding some of the info in it to the main table. The new table was started in October 2007, but no work has been done on it since.
Also, most of the figures in it do not add up e.g. it shows Northwest with 317 narrow-body aircraft and 58 wide-body aircraft - making a total of 375, yet the total figure is listed as 312. If you take off the 77 aircraft listed in the footnotes, the total is only 298, not 312.
The table just adds confusion to the stats in its incomplete state. It is also ambitious to attempt a breakdown of aircraft types for each airline listed and it is doubtful that this part of the table would be kept updated. I would suggest that if a similar table is to be added in future, then it should be complete before it is added.Ozzieboy (talk) 12:08, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed table at top of article

message: It seems the info is already there in the article World's largest airlines.
Vineet Aggarwal (talk) 02:53, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Some of the numbers don't match those of another page and some aren't saying that it isn't just the main part of the airline, ie not mentioning it includes the fleet of it's regional counterpart.--Goldwing 5000 (talk) 06:10, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fleet Numbers
Talk:Jack Murray (Australian footballer)

message: I doubt this is the same Jack Murray, and either way we should have an article or section on the rally driver too. 
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/06/07/1054700440813.html
is a start.
A mention of the other redex would be good too. Andrewa (talk) 19:52, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Gelignite Jack
Talk:Yugorsk

message: Are sentences like "Its high reputation is confirmed by multiple awards won at national festivals
and forums" , "The local museum - pride of all townspeople - shows .... " , " Sport has been an important way of forming a sound mind in a sound body",
"Tyumentransgas is proud of its sportsmen..." and " Yugorsk became one of the most prosperous, dynamically developing towns in Khantia-Mansia, an island of stability "
really necessary in this article ?  Do this sentences help us to keep a "neutral" view of the city ? Marcialgo (talk) 10:47, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, of course not.  Feel free to fix.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 20:24, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facts or Opinion ?
Talk:Ōkatana

message: "太" isn't "ō", and "太刀" is pronounced "tachi". There's already an article: tachi.
This article (the "Ōkatana" one, I mean) shouldn't even exist, really. 88.161.129.43 (talk) 23:19, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur with the above. The combination of kanji "Ō" and "katana" is "大刀", but that is read "taitou"/"daitou" (often missread as "Daikatana", for which there is already an article: Daikatana (sword)). So, delete or merge with tachi? --Hecko (talk) 01:24, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There isn't much to merge... And I really don't know where that "ōkatana" reading comes from, so I'm not sure it's notable enough to be mentioned in the tachi article. I'm all for the deletion of this article, myself. 88.161.129.43 (talk) 02:43, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant / plain wrong
Talk:End of World War II in Asia

message: I'd like to see a mention of the Japanese reaction to the Potsdam Declaration, the mokusatsu (& clarification of its meaning), & Japanese efforts to get a surrender deal, brokered through the SU, beginning in April '45.  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  08:50, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gone MIA 

message: Did Japan have any other allies in the Far East other than Thailand (Siam)? Wikipedia has an article on Allied Commission which list what to most English speaking people will be a surprising number of Axis countries, all but one of them European. It would be helpful to expand the section on Thailand and any other allies to compare and contrast their treatment with that of the European states. -- PBS (talk) 11:39, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Vichy France until early 1945 Mztourist (talk) 13:25, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thailand (Siam) 

message: * I agree with MilHistBot's assessment of B5=n  The article still lacks an infobox although 's addition of images improves this area.  The lead is too short to meet the requirements of a lead paragraph (tag added).  The "Prelude" and "Final Stages" sections are just chronologies and are covered in more detail in a table in Timeline of Axis surrenders in World War II
**  I have a question. What is meant by "infobox"? I do not believe there is an infobox for the end of wars, but please correct me if I am mistaken. Heythereimaguy (talk) 13:23, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Here is a link to Template:Infobox military conflict, which would probably be the appropriate infobox to use for this article.  Note that a lot of the entries are optional.  --Lineagegeek (talk) 19:28, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:    I agree, but It should not take a lot of editing to make this a narrative article, with a paragraph in the Prelude on the surrender of the other major Axis powers (including dates) and a paragraph on the Soviet commitment to enter the war against Japan, including the conferences, their dates and results.  --Lineagegeek (talk) 19:28, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Alright, I have done that. Heythereimaguy (talk) 01:52, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you can do something similar with the Final Stages and Aftermath, I think we have a winner! --Lineagegeek (talk) 19:54, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  MilHistBot assessment
Template talk:Japanese swords

message: A spear and a glaive seem somewhat out of place in a template titled "... swords."  It may not be wise to begin a slippery slope of non-swords on this sword template. Bradford44 (talk) 04:36, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone ahead and removed the naginata and yari from the template.  It doesn't make any more  sense to include Japanese weapons that aren't swords in this "Japanese swords" template than it would to include swords that aren't Japanese.  In my opinion, the naginata and yari are as out of place in this template as a rapier or claymore would be. Bradford44 (talk) 03:36, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They are considered swords due to how they are made. Please go read the Japanese swords article. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 05:37, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Note that these are the only two exceptions I would make. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 05:39, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other?

message: Are the entries in the template ordered somehow? If yes, how? (apparently not alphabetically) bamse (talk) 17:58, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there's any particular order at the moment. Kirill [talk] [prof] 00:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not? ;-) bamse (talk) 08:30, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: To be quite honest, because I'm not sure what the right order would be.  Doing it alphabetically would be easy, but strikes me as a bit simplistic.  I'd prefer something based on chronological development or some other meaningful subcategorization, but nothing obvious comes to mind. Kirill [talk] [prof] 12:57, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. Chronological order sounds good, but it might be difficult to know when some of the older weapons were developed. Any time of order would be preferable to the present random arrangement in my opinion. Besides alphabetical order one could think of ordering by length (nagasa). Not sure what to do with shinken in this case, though... bamse (talk) 15:34, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order?