lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Gears of War characters

message: I reccomend that you put that carmine died after asking marcus to tell his family he loves them and that marcus collected his cog tags and letter to his big brother Clay carmine. thank you
antihero276
:Doesn't he say something along the lines of "tell my brothers I love them" alluding to even more Carmine brothers still alive? That there are potential Carmine's to reappear in the series is complete conjecture, but I think that more brothers are alluded to other than Tony & Ben should be added. Hehe, It somehow reminds me of the story of The Three Billy-Goats Gruff. Somehow making me think each Carmine brother is going to get PWND along the series until a final super-badass one shows up in GoW5 or something that carries the whole story, slays the final boss, etc. hehe. 4.255.52.240 (talk) 23:53, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There are four Carmine brothers.  The only ones that have been unveiled thus far are Anthony, Benjamin, and Clay.  In the beginning training mission, Benjamin tells sergeant Fenix that he has 4 brothers and all of them serve in the military.  Then shortly after his death, you find a letter from Ben to Clay (whom he addresses as his brother). --The Guy complain edits 00:02, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If one of the brothers says he has 4 brothers, that makes 5 brothers, no? 4.242.174.212 (talk) 08:28, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That was a mistake by The Guy. Benjamin says that "all four of us" are in the military (or something), not that he has four brothers. --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 15:37, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Benjamin

message: Does anyone think that we should put Jace in, or wait till more information arises? All I know he was voiced by Nolan North in GOW2, he will be voiced by Drake in GOW3 and play a major role and be a playable character, he is the protagonist in the comics,  and he only appeared so far in the beginning of Act 2  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.115.203.75 (talk) 08:45, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jace 

message: Should we be adding more info on Corporal Michael Barrick of Echo Six from the comic - Seeing that Epic is creating a Gears 3 DLC based on him? ♠♠  BanëJ  ♠ ♠ 05:24, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michael Barrick
Talk:China White (band)

message: This article presents opinion as fact (China White as one of the two 'preeminent' punk bands in Orange County, etc) and lacks citations for some of its factual assertions. Dogmo1001 (talk) 17:04, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of citation, arbitrary, unsupportable assertions and conclusions
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Mindless eating

message: Many of the changes have been made that were suggested earlier.  One of the, I believe, misunderstood take-aways of this concept is that it connotes an out-of-control, hopeless relationship with food.  What needs to be underscored, and I think this has been done is that there is a silver lining here, that mindless eating can also be used to eat better.
If it would be advised to directly link this concept to the book, that would clarify the concept in similar manner.
Jychao 01:16, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:California State Normal School

message: Added section heading and new material. SNS football team image to come.User:CSU Spartan 02:53, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  State Normal School & its athletics 

message: The material about the name of the San Francisco Normal School is historically sourced from citation #4, "Washington Square". Michaelch7 1 January 2007
:Please note: Editors requested to ensure schools' actual name--Minns Evening Normal School--is not changed. It wasn't atypical to not use the possessive in this case. All reports of the school list it as such. Ommnomnomgulp (talk) 19:51, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the San Francisco Normal School (aka Minns) 

message: I propose that we merge the California State Normal School article into the one for San Jose State University. As both describe the same subject, having two articles seems redundant. Also, information on one page hasn't been propagating to the other. - Johnlogic (talk) 22:31, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger to San Jose State University
Talk:Aifric

message: Well in fairness, i was a little annoyed that this programme was accompanied by a Brittish Television Stub icon(not any more as i deleted it). Clearly insulting. I'm not sure how to begin a "Stub". But it would be nice if someone could.
-- Stub Added
I cannot tell who requested this, but I have added a stub for Irish Television, and I will continue to monitor this page.
Thank you for your concern. Dave.
Davidlive (talk) 19:39, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irish Television Stub 

message: afric is a great show.i like to watch it even though its in irish and its hard to understand but i think if it was in english it would be popular all over the world and TG4(the network its aired on) are really selling themselves short.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.78.170.83 (talk) 22:10, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  As I said most of the world (most of Europe) doesn't speak English. And like many children's/Teen shows Aifric could be re-dubbed into numerous other languages. It is difficult to get sales for Irish programming around the world, even when in English. RTÉ have had some international success but often to countries that don't speak English, so shows like The Clinic have to either be re-dubbed or subtitled to suit that country. Also just because a programming is in a different language to your native tongue doesn't automatically mean it is not worth watching. Well done to TG4 for actually producing a Teen Drama something that RTÉ haven't done in years and something that TV3 just won't do, perhaps it is those companies selling Irish drama short.IrishTV (talk) 00:10, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Afric would have been a worldwide hit had it been in english: 

message: archived copy Bogger (talk) 00:11, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Did you know nomination
Talk:Blue Serpent Clock (Fabergé egg)

message: Over the last couple of days an editor (editing under both an IP and username) has repeatedly changed the dates attributed to some of the eggs. The fact that there is discussion over the dates of some of the eggs is included both here on the other pages and is backed up with references. 
The proposed dates are only theories and are not universally accepted, however the user is attempting to present them as universally accepted fact. The source he uses to back up his changes even says "Not all Faberge scholars agree with my theory". As I pointed this out to him he has said he will get that website changed. This suggests a COI and also means the "Mieks" Fabergé Eggs website is self-published and can not be considered a reliable source.
As this seemed to be someone new to wikipedia, not familiar with policies regarding neutral point of view etc. etc., I initially was quite gentle. However the editing is increasingly becoming disruptive. The repeated removal of large sections of referenced material, the non neutral presentation of disputed theory as universally accepted fact, the inclusion of unattributed directly copy and pasted material in violation of copyright and now attempts to change an external source in order to back up their claims, are all unacceptable. Its vandalism. 
I have contacted the user yet again to warn them about such disruptive editing. Any further attempt to vandalise and disrupt the page should be dealt with severely. 
--Rushton2010 (talk) 08:29, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates of Eggs 

message: The third imperial egg, ie., the true 1887 egg was recently found. Please update the article to reflect this fact. --rtc (talk) 08:29, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated 
Talk:Thekra

message: Page Zekra is a stub and it was merged with Thekra.
It's more accurate to say Thekra or Thikra than Zikra or Zekra.
Radiant 01:22, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged 

message: Thanks for the founder of this cool profile. I have edited some mistaken information and added some other sections--Kuwait 22:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article like any other article in Wikipedia is written by many users. However, I think that the most important one of them is Bashari. --Meno25 04:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks for the founder 

message: I can't see anything that looks like an advertisement, could someone help?
radiant guy 10:44, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement? 

message: The death part blaming Saudi intelligence needs citations, or will be deleted. Thebutterfly (talk) 14:31, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death, citation needed 
Talk:Outline of telecommunication

message: See the proposal at the Village pump
The Transhumanist 09:27, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename proposal for this page and all the pages of the set this page belongs to 

message: Guidelines for the development of outlines are being drafted at Wikipedia:Outlines.
Your input and feedback is welcomed and encouraged.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guidelines for outlines 

message: Please add some relevant links to the history section.
Links can be found in the "History of" article for this subject, in the "History of" category for this subject, or in the corresponding navigation templates.  Or you could search for topics on Google - most topics turn blue when added to Wikipedia as internal links.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "History of" section needs links! 

message: I notice the main page says "See also Index of telecommunication articles" but there is no article by that name. Should that see-also be removed until there is an article? DQweny (talk) 11:37, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: No index?

message: "Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation.  The Transhumanist 00:10, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines
Talk:AALBC.com

message: Aalbc 01:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The issue isn't with the article so much as the website itself. This is not encouraging. Please see Wikipedia:Notability (web) for guidelines. Fan-1967 01:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: (Comments)

message: It probably still doesn't deserve a page on Wikipedia but I have trouble defining a no-brainer speedy nomination.  If it doesn't make more sense in the next day or so I'll take it to afd. For now my speedy nomination has been removed. •Elomis• 02:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  CSD nomination 

message: i dont think tagging this as unreferenced will help. the actual website link doesnt lead anywhere. but ill be nice and just tage it unreferenced. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 14:37, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: PROD?
Talk:Radio resource management

message: The intro sentence definition could be clearer.  It would be good to have a simpler introduction for the less technical reader.
The article seems to have a strong focus on cellular systems, with less on the other systems such as defence, administrative and wireless network aspects.
Static radio resource management and Dynamic radio resource management sections are mainly list.  Each dot point could be expanded to a sentence to explain how the idea achieves its management objective.
GB 23:30, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review

message: Please vote at Talk:Eb/N0#Survey on which unit that should be used at Wikipedia for measuring  Spectral efficiency. For a background discussion, see Talk:Spectral_efficiency#Bit/s/Hz and Talk:Eb/N0#Bit/s/Hz.
Mange01 (talk) 07:21, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survey: bit/s/Hz, (bit/s)/Hz or bit·s<sup>−1</sup>·Hz<sup>−1</sup> as [[Spectral efficiency]] unit?
Talk:Swaminarayan/Archive 1

message: Just to remind all our good friends writing and reading this discussion that Bhagwan Swaminarayan was a nice guy, did lots of great work, and has been followed, in the past 200 years, by many millions of devotees and a few thousand sadhus. Thats a great achievement. Whether you believe him to be God, or a great human, is a belief, but that he was a positive force in this world, is a fact.
As to all the other discussions about ISSO and BAPS and what-have-you, imho you people should attend a few assemblies of the 'other' camp / organization / sect. You'll probably realize - if you're honest enough - that its all the same. wildT 14:11, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

message: one sees two spiritual successors, but what about the current acharaya (Pamukh Swami). He seems to be the one who has spread internationally, Swaminarayan sect. --Hydman 08:51, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank your for your reply. If you re-read my post you will find that I didn't say that only devotees of the Original Swaminarayan Sampraday are 'aware of this'. I said only devotees of the Original Swaminaryan Sampraday question this. This is true, is it not? BAPS followers see no issue in the fact that Pramukh Swami Maharaj received diksha from his Guru as opposed to an Acharya. Regardless of whether that is right of them or not, and regardless of whether or not Pramukh Swami Maharaj has received true diksha, it is undisputable fact that it is devotees of the Original Swaminarayan Sampraday who question the issue as opposed to BAPS devotees who do not see it as a problem. My suggested edit is simply a reflection of this. It would in no way be adding false statements to the article. Regards, Dylanpatel 22:29, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Swami
Talk:Unidirectional Lightweight Encapsulation

message: The article is categorized as physical layer protocol, but to my understanding this is a data link layer protocol, on the LLC sub-layer. Mange01 07:24, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layer 
Talk:List of Broken Sky characters

message: At least give a one or two line introduction....  Postcard Cathy 21:41, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is Broken Sky? 
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/September 30, 2005

message: Admin, please replace
 
with
 
as the original image was deleted and this is a reasonable substitute image.  Thanks.  --Tim4christ17 talk 01:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done--WinHunter (talk) 09:15, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:ACS International Schools

message: SovalValtos (talk) 21:41, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

message: Reason given was "Only 131 distinct Google hits not mentioning Wikipedia."
Aside from the point that precedent allows high schools to have their own Wikipedia pages, and ACS includes a high school, as well as middle school, elementary school, kindergarten, and pre-school, and how Google hits are not a full criteria for deletion, there are many more Google hits for this school than 131. Last year, the school was renamed from "American Community Schools". Doing a Google search for ""american community school" england -wikipedia" yields 9,640 results. While those results may be argued to include irrelevant pages (there are several unrelated "American Community Schools" in various cities), a search for one particular campus (e.g. in Surrey - ""american community school" surrey -wikipedia") yields 846 results. --└ Smith120bh/TALK ┐ 01:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod tag from [[User:Rmky87]] on 26 November 2006

message: This article needs some work done by an expert/local to bring it up to 2008.
The ACSIS web site seems quite comprehensive, but I don't have the time to do all the work.
If you know anybody that would like to help out with this, please let them know. Calebrw (talk) 15:13, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert needed 
Talk:Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance for Wireless

message: I agree that MACAW does not solve the exposed terminal problem, but it seems like the problem that is being described in this section isn't actually the exposed terminal problem. An example of the exposed problem is when it is actually acceptable for some node to send because it doesn't realize the node that is currently receiving is out of its Tx range. It would think this because it was in range of the transmitting node. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nbeckman (talk • contribs) 16:31, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Part about exposed terminal incorrect?
Talk:Rician fading

message: The second part of the definition which states that Rician fading occurs when one path is much stronger than others is bugging me.  If the reflection is nearly as strong as the main path (e.g. over flat wet ground) the fading will be worse because the two paths will cancel each other almost entirely.  If the reflection is much weaker the fading will also be much weaker. 
71.174.240.170 23:46, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not worse than Rayleigh fading, where there is no stronger path, meaning that the "risk" for cancellation is higher. Mange01 22:57, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Furthermore the second path may be in phase with the first one (giving constructive interference), thus resulting in an amplified signal at the receiver. Fakk 19:49, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Jean Little

message: Does anyone care about her pets?
If noone responds to that, I'll take it as a "yes". Also, there should be some links to her published works, as well as the awards she's won. Furthermore, the article is generally poorly written—ironic considering its' topic is an award-winning writer.
I think there hiclass="autosigned">—Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.146.32.72 (talk) 23:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Eugène Gigout

message: Gigout's name is often misspelled 'Gigot', just google 'organist gigot'or 'composer gigot'. I believe this began with intentional teasing in his youth, but my only source so far is a programme note. The misspelling is a verifiable fact but I suppose it too needs a good secondary source these days. I will * this page & dig further when I can but would appreciate help. The Gigot dab page should also link here, I myself got here by looking him up as 'Gigot' & not finding him. --D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 14:24, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  AKA Gigot
Talk:The Hitcher (2007 film)

message: I find the content on this article unreadable because of the terrible grammar (Mostly punctuation, but also spelling). Someone with knowledge of this film, please administer some heavy editing to the article. JuanD t (talk) 14:49, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreadable

message: Is there a reason the "unrated" version was scrapped? It was listed on amazon a few weeks ago, proclaiming to be 6 minutes longer, and now has been scrapped. McDanger 12:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unrated

message: To be released Monday 1st June?!... 1st June aint a Monday, and i dont know the actual release date to change it. Postmoderner 16:45, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: UK release date

message: Is it even necessary to use the f-word in the plot section? -WarthogDemon 03:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language 

message: The last paragraph of the plot describes the same ending sequence as mentioned in the alternate ending DVD.  I dont know what the actually ending is, as Ive only seen the scene mentioned, so if somebody could add the cinema ending... 150.212.51.135 02:19, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ending

message: This article is too short and underdeveloped and is missing a significant portion of information on the film's production, and reception which needs to be added to the article. Information on the film's development, writing, and filming needs to be added to the production section. More reviews from notable critics needs to be added to the article as well. All of these additions needs to occur in order for this article to meet Wikipiedia's standards of a well developed article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 00:33, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Information
Talk:Warwolf

message: Which one is correct? Also how high was the machine? how many people did it take to operate? Was it only used for the siege of stirling or also on other occasions? Would be useful information for this article if anyone has it.--2A03:1B20:3:F011:0:0:0:7D (talk) 16:36, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  the two 'scale models' look massively different 

message: “The largest trebuchet ever built: Warwolf in the Siege of Stirling Castle”
Linked article has no further references to any actual sources.
Please review! 2A02:C7C:CB54:3C00:59EA:37DA:FDCD:7F47 (talk) 16:32, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable reference
Talk:Jared Newberry

message: This article needs a lot more info in order to even be called a stub. AppleRaven 01:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:PlayStation Portable

message: I found a PSP ripoff called the iGame.  There is already an iGame page for the fake iPod game system though.  If anyone is interested in making a page, here's the link to the site: http://www.unibit.com.cn/psp.htm  (JALsnipe 17:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: iGame
Talk:Yeshayah Steiner

message: You see his pic in various places with wording saying it is supposed to ward off mice. But I don't know if one of these pictures is enough of a citation. 206.181.86.98 (talk) 18:25, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

message: I think seeing people doing is certainly enough of a citation--I think it's nuts and rip it down when I see it, but see it I do, even in Los Angeles.  Unless they do it as a joke?  I guess we need to corner one of these people and find out.  But in Los Angeles it's being done by people who I don't think have that kind of sense of humor.  The history might be that way though--maybe it started as a joke and gullible Jews started doing it.  Then again weirder things have happened--look at St. Patrick.  I'd love to know more.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.10.240.1 (talk) 22:35, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warding off mice 

message: Some additional references for the 'mice' backstory. None of them are authoritative, but still may be useful. 
* https://kehilalinks.jewishgen.org/bodrogkeresztur/stories.html
* http://parsha.blogspot.com/2007/10/mouser-rebbe.html
* http://kabbalahselfcreation.blogspot.com/2013/11/the-paranormal-skills-of-mousser-rebbe.html
* http://www.5tjt.com/a-picture-is-worth-10000-words/
* http://hefkervelt.blogspot.com/2017/04/power-of-gedolim-pictures-yartzheit-of.html
Maslen (talk) 17:14, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional sources re: mice