Talk:Interstate 95 in Maryland

message: Does anyone have any information about why so many bad things happen on this stretch of 95? for example the truck rolled over, state trooper was shot, and other stuff. Hollowman512 00:30, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area between [[Maryland Route 32|MD 32]] and [[Interstate 195 (Maryland)|I-195]] 

message: How do we resubmit this article for evaluation? The article is similar in length and content to Interstate 70 in Maryland, yet it only has a Start rating. I checked the assessment project page but couldn't find anything that explained how to resubmit an article. -TheOneKEA
:If you think it's better, just change it. Unlike good or featured articles, there's no bureaucracy here. --NE2 13:36, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resubmitting for evaluation 

message: I feel that the overabundance of notes in the Exit list column is warping the table by making the Notes column too wide, with the other columns being squished as a result. I feel that a separate section on the three ghost interchanges should be created, to allow the matter to be addressed in a more suitable manner. -TheOneKEA
:OK, I went and created the section - I believe that the new section is a far better way to present the history of these ghost interchanges. -TheOneKEA
:That looks better.  I also like what the contributor did with making the exits purple.  I was wondering if the future ICC exit should be a different color too to show that it doesn't currently exist.-Jeff (talk) 01:21, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Exit List 

message: :Image:WMATA Metro Logo.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 01:31, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:WMATA Metro Logo.svg

message: See WT:USRD. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 11:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 

message: There is a summary of I-95's journey through Maryland, but it's written north-to-south.  I thought your normal convention was to write about northbound for a north-south route.
Also, I-95 from Baltimore city to the I-295 split in Delaware used to be called Maryland Northeastern Expressway (in Maryland) and Delaware Turnpike (in Delaware).  They BOTH are part of the John F. Kennedy Memorial Highway (which, as you note, got that name after JFK's assassination only 8 days after the dedication).  Some articles need to be revised because John F. Kennedy Memorial Highway is not limited to Maryland.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.20 (talk) 18:17, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  the beginning of this article 

message: The articles about the Chesapeake House and Maryland House service areas should be merged into the service areas section of this articles as they are lacking in information and individual service areas are generally not notable enough for their own articles. Service areas on other toll roads are covered in a section of the toll road article and I see no reason why these two service areas should have their own articles. The 2010 merge discussion resulted in no consensus, so I wanted to see if we could get more consensus here. Dough4872 03:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense. Sounds good to me. Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 03:04, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

text: Not that I don't understand your reasons for wanting to merge them, but doing so only leaves Illinois Tollway oasis in the Rest areas category. Granted the article isn't for an individual service area, but both the Maryland and Chesapeake Houses seem distinguished enough for separate articles. If you do decide to merge them, I'd recommend expanding the "Service areas" chapter some more. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  14:41, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

text: Well, now that the Chesapeake House has reopened, that really makes sense for the articles to be merged.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.210.39.82 (talk) 21:36, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

text: Needless to say, I'm going to redirect them right now by putting some of the info from these articles to the Interstate 95 in Maryland#Service areas section.
Support merger — These individual service areas are not notable enough to have their own articles and can be detailed in a section of the main article without violating summary style.  VC  18:14, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because these are among the busiest rest areas in the country does not justify the existence of separate articles. These rest areas have little to say special about them other than the fact they are busy. The information about them can easily be covered in the Service areas section of this article. Dough4872 00:46, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 2013 

message: Where does any one think a blurb on this project should go?  Its complete as far as I can tell, but I can't find a good source on that. Here was the press release from when it started. http://www.mdot.maryland.gov/News/Releases2017/2017_March_31_I95_Improvement_Project_to_Add_Capacity Famartin (talk) 01:19, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The press release about the project start says it's "a four-mile stretch of I-95 north of the Fort McHenry Tunnel" and mentions Boston Street as the beginning of the conversion. This area is in the "Within Baltimore" section, so this info could go there.  Of course, the article also has an Improvements section; none of its subsections seem to include the portion under discussion, though, so perhaps a new subsection there would also work. A good source on the completion would be best, if writing that the work is completed. —ADavidB 01:57, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Widening project completed in Baltimore City