lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Broadcast programming

message: I was redirected to this page when looking for "TV guide" as in the magazine, and I'm very confused why such a search would redirect to this page. Other, far less popular, magazines have Wiki pages, why not TV guide? I was hoping to find information explaining the change in size and format around 2005.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.240.151.5 (talk) 21:33, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: TV Guide

message: The current article title, Scheduling (broadcasting), is totally cumbersome and somewhat inappropriate, as the article starts off by restricting itself to television scheduling. Hence my first idea was to move it to Television scheduling.
However, I see that there is a "parallel" article Radio programming (Television programming currently redirects here), so perhaps Television programming is the correct name.
However, the things in this article basically apply equally to TV and radio, and the Radio programming article seems to be about the history of radio programs, not the nitty-gritty of scheduling them. So an even better idea would be to move this article to Broadcast programming, redirect all of the above to that article, and then, if necessary, merge the Radio programming information into existing articles such as History of radio.
Talk amongst yourselves. --Quuxplusone 04:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move

message: Aren't these all the same thing? The descriptions don't seem to support a distinction between them. --Khajidha (talk) 01:09, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Block programming vs Stacking vs Theming 

message: Having an unusual subsection in the lede is advisable in this case,  because the last sentence contains several redirect terms, which are normally in the first sentence or two, if present. Creating a subsection will emphasize the redirect terms for any reader arriving at this article via one of them. Blainster (talk) 21:01, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @ViperSnake151 please respond to suggestion Blainster (talk) 21:16, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is part of the lead because it's a key aspect and doesn't really have anywhere else to go. Also, the "unusual" also referred to the fact that it was using a heading that clashes with MoS (that's one for sub-headings, not headings). ViperSnake151  Talk   21:23, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unusual subsection in the lede
Talk:Inflationary Language

message: This article seems to exist soley for the "so on and so fifth" pun. And if we're being nitpicky, that should be "so on and so fiveth", anyway. Justdig (talk) 01:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

message: Is there a need for this article by itself?  There are very few links to it, and I don't believe a short skit merits an article.  Ratiocinate (t • c) 21:53, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Into [[Victor Borge]] 

message: There was a Scrubs episode where JD said "This tumor was so big, it was almost a threemor." That should be relevant.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.195.203.91 (talk) 15:18, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other appearences
Talk:Fourche Maline (Oklahoma stream)

message: This article meets the requirements for Start class. Bruin2 (talk) 00:54, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Article reclassification
Talk:Private defense agency

message: I couldn't help myself and ended up beefing up the article quite a bit and merging important concepts spread through the article into more concise sentences.  I am curious as to who wrote the last paragraph which is info had not seen before.  Someone please reference it or some day or other I'll delete it. Thanks
Carol Moore 22:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Beefed Up Article with References etc

message: Obviously there is a dispute which you might bring here.  While I see the point in each, I think it might help to present arguments to those also on the fence.
Carol Moore 19:49, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps "anarcho-capitalist" is too narrowly specific. But it ought to be understood that most people who consider themselves "anarchists," outside of the USA anyway, explicitly disclaim the idea of private corporations (or "agencies") of any kind. Most anarchists would laugh in the face of any "private defense agency" scheme proponent. Maybe we should use something generic like "In certain branches of anarchist political theory, a private defense agency is..." <eleland/talkedits> 20:05, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're assuming an "agency" is like a private corporation today, an entity granted special legal rights. I take it instead to just be shorthand for some individuals who work together and sell a service. Would most "anarchists" object to that? Evan R. Murphy (talk) 05:44, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

text: I keep getting reverted, but nobody explains their position. All but one of the authors mentioned here are explicitly anarcho-capitalist; one was an individualist anarchist and proto-libertarian. Again, it's totally off-base to say that "anarchist" political theory includes PDA's, when it's only included in right-wing anarchism. <eleland/talkedits> 20:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that we may as well indicate that this is supported by anarcho-capitalists rather than anarchists in general. I also think that as the set of anarcho-capitalist articles expands, we may need to change that little sidebar to make it anarcho-capitalism-specific. Aldrich Hanssen (talk) 08:46, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: For balance, there really needs to be an article on workers' militias as in the Spanish Revolution or in that Cienfuegos pamphlet about defense without NATO (whatever its called....) Not that I know about either of these things. Chaikney (talk) 23:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Anarchist v Anarcho-Capitalist Dispute
File talk:Wasscherscheiden.png

message: I don't get this map. It seems to imply, for instance, that all of Southern Italy drains into the Adriatic, or 'Adria', as the Germans apparently call it. mgekelly 04:59, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is described in the legend. Only the blue zones are drainage areas. Clear-cut drainage areas don't exist in the white zones. 83.89.43.14 (talk) 20:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Highway 20 (Israel)

message: I believe that שבעת הכוכבים is officially named "Herzliya (Center)" (with the terminus called "Herzliya (North)"), something that is confirmed by HeWiki. Let me know, TewfikTalk 05:02, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. it is called Shivat hakochavim: The hebrew article  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mokagi (talk • contribs) 11:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

message: I can't read the hebrew, but the chart is pretty explanatory. The highest number it shows is 595,000. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 13:13, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doesn't the source say 600,000? 

message: This article should not contain Hebrew in any instances where an English translation is available (including even the official name). I'm mostly referring to the Interchanges section. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 20:00, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hebrew 

message: On the map it doesn't make it very clear which road this one is Cls14 (talk) 09:21, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: (Make sure your cache is purged and) take a look now.  Any better? @Efrat (talk) 15:04, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes thanks! Cls14 (talk) 07:21, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Map
Talk:Gene Bess

message: Please participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#"winningest" in sports articles. Until consensus is reached, articles should be reverted to the previous stable version, per the policy WP:NOCONSENSUS: "In discussions of proposals to add, modify or remove material in articles, a lack of consensus commonly results in retaining the version of the article as it was prior to the proposal or bold edit." —Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:25, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Winningest in sports articles under discussion

message: I am 15, I'm going into high  school and I want you to come see my first game. I don't really know how to contact you. It will be this summer sometime because  they have a summer  team.  Williamnance599 (talk) 04:07, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basketball
Talk:Kihon

message: How "karateka fostering the correct spirit and attitude at all times" related to calligraphy or ikebana kihon. Anyone going to write about hundreds of different kihons in different Japanese arts? Anyway, for each of them it will be 1-2 paragraphs. Real meaning of kihon is just dictionary article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rambalac (talk • contribs) 07:59, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaningless article
Talk:Travellerspoint

message: Hi, I've updated the footnotes and references for this article. I believe it's now fairly clear that this article qualifies for notability, according to Notability_(web). First, Travellerspoint has been "the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself." Second, it won the Travel Mole Award, which is a significant and notable award for the Travel & Tourism industry. As a side note, it won in the same category as Travelocity and Opodo, who both have Wikipedia pages.  Ericnicolaas 05:09, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: I have reworked the article to sound less like an advertisement, but the tag is still up. Can any editor suggest what else needs to change, or is the article acceptable? --Ericnicolaas 00:36, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What exactly is your connection to the website or its parent?  Montco 01:08, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm an editor at Travellerspoint, but why is that relevant? As per Wikipedia:NPOV, "all editors and all sources have biases", but views on Wikipedia are required to be represented "without bias". The information I have included in this article is factual, so I believe that it qualifies as having been presented "without bias". As per WP:NOT#SOAPBOX, the requirement is that articles be written in an "objective and unbiased style". If it is felt that this article still needs improvement in that regard, could someone suggest what else needs to change (or change it)?--Ericnicolaas 21:25, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is also the issue of conflicts of interest.  I asked whether or not you were connected to the firm and you answered the question to my satisfaction.  When I have more time, I will make some changes to hopefully trim the ad-sounding language.Montco 04:48, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertising style issue
Talk:Equestrian events at the 2006 Asian Games

message: Why are the horse names wikilinked?  Are any of them notable? Josh Parris#: 05:10, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:William M. Treloar

message: If anyone has access to this journal article, it looks like (from a search-engine peek into a small part of it) that it has additional information on Treloar's publishing business during his years in Kansas City:
:
I'll see if I can track it down later, but I thought I'd leave the reference here in case someone else gets to it first. --Delirium 05:14, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Oropharynx

message: Hello,
            I have been suffering with a sore throat for about 2 months and i am getting concerned about cancers to the throat etc, I use superglue to attach a false tooth and i am getting concerned about fumes from the glue, could it cause my sore throat,i have used the glue for approx 2 years now at regular intervals say about every 6 weeks to re attach this false tooth, any advise would be gratefully recieved,
            Kindest Regards Paul.
Hello Paul,
Wikipedia is no place to be looking for medical advice. This said I have some serious doubts that regularly putting glue in your mouth is a good idea. My advice to you would be to see a doctor right away and once he's made sure you're okay see a dentist about that tooth.
--Meridius 19:49, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

message: I believe it should, as it remains a stub after more than 4 years since its creation. Seems a bit excessive to me to have three stubs (nasopharynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx) in addition to one Start-class article (human pharynx), when we could have one C-class article describing the human pharynx, with a section for each of the above. DiverDave (talk) 11:05, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this article be merged into [[Human pharynx]]?
Talk:Kenton, Oklahoma

message: This place truly is a gem in Oklahoma. The best scenery in the state is found here as well as the brightest star's. Great hiking, rock hounding and exploring! - signed by ?
There was a NPOV notice on the article page (placed in 2011), but I see no discussion here about it so I'm closing it. --Jmbranum (talk) 17:36, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

message: The distances to the closest major cities is a little confusing. "it is approximately 155 miles (249 km) south to Amarillo, Texas" Does this mean that Kenton is 155 miles away from Kenton? If so, we need to make it "It is 155 miles north of Amarillo, Texas" or something to that similar to that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8803:A20A:8300:6168:7934:ECCA:A18 (talk) 15:47, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing the distances to the closest major citites.
Talk:Eulogius of Alexandria

message: There are three problems with this article. First, it describes the Copts of Egypt, here called Monophysites, as heretics. That is really POV if anything is. The Copts would have as much right to regard the Catholics and Eulogius himself as heretics. Second, it is not true at all that he was successful in contending with the Copts. Rather, his tenure in Egypt saw the complete reconstruction of the rival Coptic Church under its energetic Patriarch or Pope Damian (578-604), so that the Orthodox represented by Eulogius were left almost without any followers at all in Egypt, as is shown by Eulogius's very correspondence with Gregory the Great mentioned in the article. Third, the POV statement, "It has been rightly said that he restored for a brief period to the church of Alexandria that life and youthful vigour characteristic of those churches only which remain closely united to Rome," should be completely removed. To attribute life and vigor only to those churches that remain closely united with Rome obviously serves Catholic mission but is quite a bigoted and hostile statement from the Coptic viewpoint.
Jim Davis 05:19, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the "heretical errors". --mfb (talk) 16:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wilkie (surname)

message: I asked my father, a Wilkie born in Perth area, about the Wilkie myth and his reponse was: 
'S true that they called the spirit of a burial mound
a wilkie in the far north of Scotland. But not at all 
similar to bigfoot. More like a barrow wight, I'd say. 
And would not be surprised if derived from Indo-European
word for 'wolf': *vilku.
He also has not heard/seen a Wilkie tartan. It would be nice to dig that up, if it's not a typo.
It was this Wilkey's understanding that while the Wilkies/Wilkeys have claim to, or a right to wear, the MacDonald tartan (being a part of that clan), the sept itself has not had a separate tartan.
Further, it was my understanding that Wilkie was the Scots diminutive of William.
wilkie does have its own tartan  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.221.22 (talk) 16:29, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Quest (Anderson novelette)

message: I cannot find the supposed publisher, "Hat Publishing", perhaps the original author of this article can supply the publishers information? James Kidd (contr/talk/email) 05:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, you are wrong. Real publisher is the Ares. 46.17.7.19 (talk) 14:31, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publisher 

message: The list of characters includes Sir Owain, who was killed in the original story.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:50C7:8D00:ACA9:B189:2369:91A7 (talk) 14:00, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: ERROR?
Talk:Square foot

message: how too measure a room for square foot
the equivalent in mm^2 and cm^2 is wrong:
# 98 903.04 square millimetres      
# 98669.0304 square centimetres     
# 0.0929344334430304 square metres 
for more information please visit e.g. the german version  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.53.103.101 (talk) 08:12, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  room
Talk:Red Fork, Oklahoma

message: This article is beyond stub class. I have changed it to start class. Bruin2 (talk) 15:04, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Reclassification
Talk:The Days of Perky Pat

message: That's a pretty good block of unsourced quotes in this article... Anybody know where those came from? -- Antepenultimate 06:07, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

message: ... contains a scene in which Homer buys a game for Lisa, named "Perky Patty's Princess Shop". --Gerald Etkind  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.116.197.72 (talk) 01:00, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simpson's 550th episode 

message: :
Because the someone is doll-like, or out of touch with reality; or because adjective + alliterative name is a pattern often spontaneously reinvented?  Unless there's more to the allusion than the mere choice of words, I'd say remove this. —Tamfang (talk) 19:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screamers
Talk:Saturday Night Football

message: I saw a San Jose State vs. Nevada game on the same day of the World Series, and maybe it should be either a non-marquee game to fill in the time gap for ABC or part of the schedule. It is broadcast regionally in the West Coast.
:That wasn't part of the Saturday Night Football coverage but just a regional game on the West Coast.  I believe it was in place of the 9:00 AM PT Texas-Nebraska game that could not be shown on ABC due to restrictions. Pat Maher 00:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hiatus?
Talk:It is not a Love...

message: Can someone change the title of this entry?  The name of the album directly translates to "This is not Love...", not "It is not a Love..."
I would do it, but unfortunately I dont' know if it's possible to change entry titles :/ 24.187.8.147 06:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing the title of the album
Talk:Solute carrier family

message: I have put this in 
:Category:Transport proteins, but I'm not actually certain that they are transport proteins.  Can someone confirm or confute?  Thanks, delldot | talk 06:33, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Transport proteins?

message: I have removed the cleanup flag, since it is not clear to me what if anything needs cleaning up.  Granted, the list of families and members within each family is very long, but that was the point of this article.  Please be more specific.  Boghog2 02:28, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup?

message: Since the article lists the families of solute carriers, should we not move the title from "Solute carrier family" to "Solute carrier families"? Peter Chastain (talk) 04:35, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The solute carrier superfamily (singular) is composed of 51 families.  Perhaps it would be better to rename the title to "Solute carrier superfamily". Boghog (talk) 05:44, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name: Family? Families? 
Talk:The Crimson Tide

message: This resulted in a long-running enmity between Mason and Gascoigne, with Mason considering the editor to have essentially ruined his book.[citation needed]
I removed this statement since it has been in the article for a long time but yet, no source has been supplied supporting the proposition that Mason and Gascoigne had a long-running enmity due to the error. However, if someone can supply a reference that can support this, please don't hesitate to add it once more.--Auger Martel 06:34 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Good man. If you look on the former Fighting Fantasy site (via the internet archive), there's an interview with Mason where he describes Gascoigne's edit to the Mudworm. It's clear he's pretty pissed off about it, but no justification for "long-running enmity" or whatever. --WebDrake 12:28, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mudworm printing error

message: The article mentions that there is a special "FURY" statistic, but the book itself lists the stat as "FEROCITY" instead. (An edit to this effect was made, but was reverted by a bot for being "unconstructive".) -- 59.167.104.227 (talk) 05:11, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You're quite right. I've edited again. Hopefully the fact that I'm a named editor rather than an IP one will prevent a repetition of the reversion. Loganberry (Talk) 23:42, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "FURY" statistic
Talk:V-ATPase

message: I have put this in 
:Category:Transport proteins, but I'm not actually certain that they are transport proteins.  Can someone confirm or confute?  Thanks, delldot | talk 06:40, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can someone more in the know determine if "singe" = "single" ?Srednuas Lenoroc (talk) 11:57, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Once again, I'm sure it's "single", and that is confirmed by a Google search to be a term in use. JohnCD (talk) 12:21, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "singe-particle cryo-EM" 

message: Roles played - In addition, other variety? of biological processes (varieties)
Disruption of the gene vma-1 gene - delete first gene
summary box - subunit C - crystal structure of subunit C (vma5p) of the yeast v-atpase - capitalize Crystal, Vma5p, & V-ATPase
Structure - The complex structure of the V-ATPase has been revealed through the structure of the M. Sexta and Yeast - don't capitalize sexta & yeast
summary box - subunit d/d2 - crystal structure of subunit C (yeast subunit d) of v-atpase - capitalize Crystal & V-ATPase
and are termed Vma12p, Vma21p, and Vma22p.[12][13][14][15] - should [15] be [16]?
V1 - Unlike Vo, the V1 domain is hydrophobic?
summary box - subunit H, N-terminal - crystal structure of the regulatory subunit H of the v-type atpase of saccharomyces - capitalize Crystal, V-type, ATPase, & Saccharomyces
Subunit C V-ATPase (Vacuolar-ATPase) C represents the C terminal subunit that is part of the V1 complex - delete (Vacuolar-ATPase) & terminal; 1 should be a subscript
between the V1 and Vo complexes - 1 & o should be subscripts
Subunit C function - shouldn't this be combined with Subunit C?
catalytic (V1) and membrane (VO) sectors - should be 1 & o subscripts
dissociation of the V1 and Vo - should be 1 & o subscripts
Essentially, by creating a high electrochemical gradient and low pH, this powers the enzyme to create more ATP. - this sentence does not make sense; V-ATPase uses rather than produces ATP
Subunit H - free V1 subunits, it stops ATP hydrolysis when V1 and Vo - 1 & o should be subscripts
Vo - The Vo domain is hydrophilic?
Vo Subunits table - a/I is missing TCIRG1 (which encodes the a3 isoform)
Subunit a/I - in the Vo or Ao - o should be subscript
subunit a of FO - O should be subscript o
Subunit d/C - subunit C in A-ATpases, is a part of the Vo - capitalize P in A-ATPases & o in Vo should be subscript
V-ATPase assembly - The precise mechanisms by which V-ATPases assembly?
V-ATPase evolution - consisting of two different proteins evolves into the fungi version with three different proteins - change proteins to subunit c proteins
Regulation - by macrolide antibiotics, such as concanamycin (CCA) and balifomycin? (should be bafilomycin) - & add some before macrolide
Human diseases - Osteopetrosis - Osteopetrosis is generic name - add a before is
Mutations to the chloride channel ClC7 gene also lead to both dominant and recessive osteopetrosis.[40?]
References - 5 is wrong
External links - V-type+ATPase - should be V-Type ATPase
     108.18.223.247 (talk) 08:46, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  assorted problems