lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dietary fiber

message: Section 4.1 (Research) has outdated studies on colorectal cancer risk and fiber intake. More recent meta-analyses show a marked reduction in risk of colon cancer with higher fiber intake. Here are four: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09637486.2018.1446917
https://ascopubs.org/doi/abs/10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.e15080
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/7/1579
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1556370717301013
2603:8081:3D01:4800:D96E:5A9F:D45F:6B01 (talk) 19:23, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Research Section Needs Revision 

message: Does not give any useful information to the general reader. Seems like a hodgepodge of unorganized "information". Krok6kola (talk) 12:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Any user can edit to improve the article. Because diverse soluble and insoluble fibers are in most common foods, isolating individual fiber components and determining their individual effect on health or lowering disease risk have been decades-long challenges in research. The Linus Pauling Institute review is one of the most up-to-date (and relatively easy to "digest") articles on the health research for dietary fiber. Here is a PubMed listing of reviews on dietary fiber, showing that not a lot of high-quality clinical reviews exist (I'm assuming for the reasons of fiber diversity in foods and difficulty in isolating them in dietary studies). It would be helpful for editors to list here and discuss problem areas in the article, then we can reach a consensus on how to make the article clearer. Zefr (talk) 17:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  horrible article 

message: There's probably a more appropriate place to display the image captioned "Children eating fiber-rich food" smh 2601:CD:C480:1BB0:7D28:D223:E51:B32B (talk) 04:46, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  questionable placement of image 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :High-residue diet and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#High-residue diet until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Onel5969 TT me 17:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "High-residue diet" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Aedh Muimhnech Ó Conchobair

message: I will not vote on this because I am the creator of the page, and it is merely part of a larger work-in-progress on the Kings of Connacht. If those of you wishing to vote on the issue at hand would look at the main article before voting, I'd be much obliged. Fergananim
*It was tagged for speedy deletion, which doesn't involve any voting, just an admin's judgement. I took the tag off, because substubs aren't speedy candidates, and this thing contains a bunch of relevant facts. If you put a written sentence or two in the article it will help fend off other speedy tags. Kappa 03:17, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Subject:Delection
Talk:Manners

message: People have written huge books about manners (Emily Post and Miss Manners). Surely there's enough content for an article?
54653..20157
6743651.0.363224685412468743521  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.90.217.135 (talk) 02:03, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

message: This article should be expanded. Some suggestion for possible areas to cover include:
* Table Manners
* Differences in what constitutes proper manners in different parts of the world such as Western societies, Middle East, Asia, etc.
* Changes in what constitutes good manners throughout history. Increasingly laxity in following certain traditional good manners such as "No elbows on the table" or "Not wearing a hat indoors".
* Famous newspaper Columns and authors devoted to proper manners such as Miss Manners.
* Statistics on manners.
--Cab88 11:26, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion Request

message: * According to The Atlantic Monthly (July 1924) article "Law and Manners" by The Right Honorable Lord Moulton, 'manners' is the domain that inhabits the space between what a person 'can do' and what a person 'may do.' 
* Quoting the article, 
 Between 'can do' and 'may do' ought to exist the whole realm which recognizes the sway of duty, fairness, sympathy, taste, and all the other things that make life beautiful and society possible.  
* 'Manners' are not enforceable by law, but include all things a person would impose upon themselves.
* 'Manners' is a term broader than 'duty' and 'morals,' but one that might include both.
* How does 'manners' differ from 'etiquette'? 'Etiquette' describes definable situations and gives rules and specific behaviors for those occasions. 'Manners' are more ambiguous. 'Manners' refers to those situations in which no law inexorably determines our course, and yet we feel we are not free to choose as we would. 
* 'Manners' is the civil area between Positive Law and Personal Freedom. This is the area that is not legislated, and yet individuals behave in a way that is mindful to how their actions and choices affect the overall dynamic.
* In Lord Moulton's words, 'manners' is "obedience to the unenforceable.'
* How is 'manners' related to 'civility' and to Wikipedia Civility?
Melissajmills3 (talk) 14:12, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion Request Continued

message: The last paragraph reads like it was written by Miss Manners--perchance was it cribbed from one of her books or columns?  Even if not a copyvio; the tone of the paragraph isn't very encyclopedic.  --EngineerScotty 05:14, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: i agree; it's not encyclorific, so nuke it.203.213.90.41 (talk) 01:10, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last paragraph
Talk:1949 World Federalist California Resolution

message: I'm aware this is the type of thing that gets vfd'ed, but I think it would be of interest to world federalists and those who follow the world federalist movement. It shows how popular that movement was in the 1940s. It will fail a google test, but note that only a small percentage of the internet shows up on google searches. Rad Racer 02:26, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Google

message: This article has less number of citations kindly provide proper citations and try to improve article according to Wikipedia policies and if you allow my self I can certainly help you in expanding it. Thanks.-- Faizan Munawar Varya chat contributions 01:06, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations required
Talk:Federal district

message:  lower case, like for all other subnational entitities
Tobias Conradi 02:29, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: I think we really need to write a single article that combines the information from Federal District and Federal Territory. -‎ Algri (talk) 06:36, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: The article is wrong about Argentina.
Argentina IS a federal republic. The Autonomous City of Buenos Aires elects its own government since 1996, but it is still (since 1880) the Federal Capital of the Argentine Republic, by the Constitution. DelArgonauta (talk) 17:26, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Argentina 

message: Federal Judicial Districts and Federal Reserve Districts in U.S., the Federal Districts in Russia and Federal Capital Districts are four completely different things, although the same word is used. There must be a disambiguation. --80.144.59.203 (talk) 21:10, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you disambiguate your comments? I really don't understand what you want done. - BillCJ (talk) 22:45, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

text: Note that articles on United States federal judicial districts, Federal Reserve districts, and Federal districts of Russia already exists, and are linked in the relevant sections. - BillCJ (talk) 22:59, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation necessary 

message: are there any proposed federal capital districts in the world? has the canadien government made any proposals to split off ottawa from ontario and make a federal district? including a canadien federal district canada would be subdivied into 14 natioanl subjects instead of the 13 now. could other counties have proposals like this in the works? 76.244.155.36 (talk) 00:32, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed federal districts 

message: To the best of my knowledge, there are quite a few federations that do not have a federal district (Switzerland, Belgium, Germany, ...). The opening statement in the Canada section thus seems invalid. What would be the best way to correct the section? Remove the sentence and rephrase?
Vinceroni (talk) 15:20, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canada is not the only country without a federal district 

message: Isn't that a current federal district within the meaning of this article? Grassynoel (talk) 09:40, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure, but it really depends on what reliable sources say. It is covered at Capital districts and territories, though. BilCat (talk) 10:28, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Australian Capital Territory
Talk:Ritu (season)

message: Please expand this article. Useful material may be found in the article's "Further reading" section. --Yumegusa (talk) 20:10, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please expand 

message: Shishir basanta is one of the folk story from Nepal which is very interesting to read.It is about two brother which are falsely blamed by their step mother and are separated from each other.It is a emotional story 103.94.255.124 (talk) 03:40, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please write Article on shishir basanta story 

message: The explanation of the six seasons of the vedic literature by the Hindus is not convincing. It seems that the original meaning just was no more known. To this original meaning the following seems to point:
In Pancavimsa Brahmana 10.3.12 we read:
"The Viraj is of thirty syllables; six in number are the seasons; through the Viraj he finds a support in the seasons, through the seasons in the Viraj" (W. Caland translation)
The last part is a hint to Rigveda 10.90.5:
"From him (Purusha) the Viraj is born, from the Viraj the man (Purusha)" (Janeson and Bereton translation).
Thus Purusha (the cosmic man = Vishnu) is equated to the seasons. That means the three steps of Vishnu who is the constellation Orion are equal to the six seasons. These steps are the up and down movements of Orion in the course of precession. They are done in 1 1/2 precession cycles of round about 26.000 years each. That means there are four seasons in one cycle marked by the solstices and equinoxes. 2003:F5:F746:F400:58FF:87C1:D9A3:FC2 (talk) 08:02, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of the seasons
Category talk:Swedish queens

message: This should not be a subcat of :Category:Queen consorts since Christina of Sweden and Ulrike Eleonora of Sweden were Queen regnant.  Joestynes 02:49, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: subcategory (2005) 

message: I have checked on this category page, worked it over properly and can now announce the good news that an article for each and every legitimate (officially recognized) Swedish queen from Sigrid the Haughty and/or Gunhild of Wenden till today is included. The bad news is the big mess with so many different name formats. There should be some serious attention given to this in the near future and some changes made to a number of article names, so that a list like this will make (much) more sense. I will try to submit some suggestions soon. Many of the articles still need a lot of work in the meantime. SergeWoodzing (talk) 02:48, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  List complete today!
Talk:Acer grandidentatum

message: This smells like copyvio from a guide to Texas plants. I can't find a source, so I'm not saying it is. Still leaves me wondering though. -- Cyrius|✎ 02:51, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly suspect so too, but can't find a source either (it isn't online, but very much has the look of being copied verbatim from a book). I'm cutting a whole lot of waffly bilge and replacing it with info culled from my various tree books, in my own words. - MPF 10:45, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Source?
Talk:Osmotic lysis

message: Hey. I noticed there was a stub for viral and stub for osmotic lysis, as well as a lack of one for the third reference in the disambiguation page for lysis. I suggest that these three topics be combined into a single page called cytolysis. What are the thoughts?
jtvisona 0302005
:I agree, since the viral and osmotic lysis pages are both part of the subject for the cytolysis page. The first sentence on this page states that osmotic lysis is a cytolysis, so I see no reason as to why those pages shouldn't be merged. AndyZ 01:30, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:The Monkees

message: This has not been fully discussed before, so I'm bringing it up now as reference for when the next person inevitably makes this change.
I do not believe that it is accurate to describe the Monkees as an American-British band (or however you want to word it). The only tie they had to England at all was Davy Jones, and Jones demonstrably contributed the least of all four members in terms of songwriting. Yes, he sang on several of their songs, but that was as a musician under contract (which all the Monkees were) until the reunions. Peter is on record as saying that Davy didn't feel that he contributed much to Headquarters, and Davy himself seemed to imply that he felt Mike left him out of the process on Justus.
I don't want to get bogged down in particulars. The point is, Davy was a hired musician for the first 9 albums (and everyone actually in charge was American), and even including the '80s and '90s, with the exception of a couple of songs almost all of Davy's contributions were vocals only, with some production thrown in. Thus, I think it is too much of a stretch to say that the Monkees were, to any significant degree, a British band...any more than covering Daddy's Song made them a swing band. Sm5574 (talk) 00:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  American-British Band
Talk:Pazz & Jop

message: Whoops, I added this w/o logging in by mistake!  If anyone has any issues or question w.r.t this article, I'm the one who created it. Sun King 04:22, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Idolator.com reacted to Christgau's dismissal from VV by creating its own "Jackin' Pop" poll, run by Michelangelo Matos, along pretty much the same principles as Pazz & Jop, and apparently drawing a comparable number of respondents. See , also  for the 2006 poll results. Christgau submitted to both, which is what he encourages others to do. Probably worth mentioning here, because it is at least a significant "fork" of Pazz & Jop. - Jmabel | Talk 07:33, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jackin' Pop 

message: The Village Voice has stopped publishing. So far I haven't seen any official announcement or other comments on the future of Pazz & Jop. Christgau got close to commenting on Twitter, but there's nothing definitive yet. It's possible that another publication will pick up the torch, but if we get to January 2019 and there's no new P&J I think it can be presumed dead. —BLZ · talk 19:49, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Several music critics have tweeted about missing Pazz & Jop, since ballots would usually be circulating this time of year; Stephen Thomas Erlewine tweeted that Uproxx "is attempting to pick up where Pazz & Jop left off by launching their first Music Critics Poll." With that, it's safe to say P&J died with the Village Voice. —BLZ · talk 09:17, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Shouts out to Doc Strange for catching Christgau’s tweet, which I just saw. Apparently P&J lives on, somehow, and even remains a VV project. —BLZ · talk 17:39, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Pazz & Jop dead?
Talk:Stanley Plotkin

message: Any info on when and/or where he was born?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.250.149.96 (talk) 06:02, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Background Data?

message: Hello, WP! I'm going to be working on a rewrite of this page over the next several weeks. If you happen to have any new sources or multimedia related to the subject, please feel free to point it out to me below. Thanks! Syko1096 (talk) 21:18, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I completed the rewrite of this article. Enjoy! Syko1096 (talk) 21:01, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Australian Aboriginal languages

message: I will be adding more languages and creating new pages via links. Imperialguy
Absence noticed: Can't find Ngunnawal / Gundungurra in the languages list. Possibly because ACT is absent from states list (sits on Ngunnawal land) but I don't have the background to confirm. Can someone with the right knowledge address this please SlinkySeahorse (talk) 08:23, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The only language list on the page is of languages with speakers in the section "Living Aboriginal Languages", and as neither Ngunnawal nor Gundungurra have speakers they shouldn't be on that list. I was wondering if you meant List of Australian Aboriginal languages? But both languages are included there as well. Which list do you mean? Dougg (talk) 23:54, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

text: I wasn't certain whether there were speakers, thanks for directing me to the list. Just did some further reading. Would be keen to find out a timeline so Ngunnawal / Gundungurra can be added to List of languages by time of extinction SlinkySeahorse (talk) 03:11, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

text: Thanks, I hadn't noticed that page before! Ngunnawal probably lost its last speakers in the first half of the 20th century, maybe the first couple of decades. This is evidenced by the fact that R.H. Mathews published a brief description in 1904 after working with speakers in the 1890s. I don't know when Gandangara would have lost its last speakers, but likely to have been a similar timeframe as Mathews & Everett published a description of the language from work also in the 1890s. Dougg (talk) 06:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding more info 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aboriginal languages. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Steel1943 (talk) 21:50, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Aboriginal languages" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: What is Australias language 2600:1004:A010:4980:556:5931:1A0F:3AD3 (talk) 18:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Australia does not have an official language, although English is by far the most commonly spoken. See Languages of Australia. HiLo48 (talk) 22:42, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australia
Talk:BBC Worldwide

message: Should 2|entertain have its own page, as a distinct entity from BBC Worldwide?  At the moment, 2 entertain and 2entertain redirect to BBC Worldwide.  (MediaWiki article naming won't allow an article called 2|entertain, because Naming conventions forbids the use of the | character in article names.)
I don't know enough about the corporate architecture to start the article myself, but I could see potential merit in its existence. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 06:05, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2|entertain 

message: It is suggested that BBC Green is merged with BBC Worldwide, yet no discussion has taken place. BBC Green appears to be a very short info stub with little or not interesting facts. Unless any objections are received then I propose the merger to take place. 
On another note BBC Worldwide article is very badly wrote and formatted it could be presented much better than is currently. //Melonite (talk) 14:17, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC Green 

message: Hi there. I work for BBC Worldwide and there are some changes that we'd really like to make to this page (e.g. we now have new Sales and Profit figures which were published last month and we also have a new logo) Is it possible to get permission to edit the page? Thanks!  — Matt Guenigault (talk • contribs) 14:08, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  General updates 

message: This article only relates history since BBC Worldwide was created out of BBC Enterprises.  BBC Enterprises currently redirects to this page.  Why is there not any history on BBC Enterprises? Etron81 (talk) 17:27, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC Enterprises history 

message: The bbc.com pages are provided by BBC Worldwide, but these are blocked in the UK so I am unable to access. See press release for description: http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/worldwide/060613capital.html John a s (talk) 22:06, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC.com
Talk:Bethóc

message: This article was a mess! Bethóc (Beathag) is not derived from Beatrix, it's a Scots Gaelic name. She was also not "MacKenneth" -- first of all, "mac" means "son of-" and her father was Malcolm, not Kenneth! The proper form is Beathag inghean ui Mhaoil Choluim, but I kept the name she's best known by. Missi—Preceding unsigned comment added by Mississippienne (talk • contribs) 06:38, 21 March 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This part of my family tree is getting quite confusing. I know that Malcolm II is my ancestor, 31 generations back. I have found one reference to a spouse being Edith de Ossory b :962 d: 4/11/1023. I have found two daughters for Malcolm and Edith, being Bethoc and Duxia Doda MacAlpin. I have Duxia marrying Fulbert De Falaise, producing Herleva. I also have Bethoc, marrying Crinan of Dunkeld, producing Duncan I. Both of these offspring, figure in my family tree. Duncan I being 29 generation ancestor and Herleva being 29 generation ancestor as well. Can anyone help. 124.186.5.83 (talk) 05:17, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who was the mother of Bethoc ingen Maíl Coluim meic Cináeda? 

message: Maldred was not a son of Bethoc. He was a son of Crinan (aka Karl Hundisson) from his first marriage.Freuchie (talk) 17:10, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maldred
Talk:Shinwari (Pashtun tribe)

message: No mention is made of the huge number of Shinwari's who have settled Pakistan's urban centres, notably in Lahore and especially Karachi where many are now born.  They dominate commerce and are known as excellent business and traders.  I think some mention of the tribesmen who live outside of the Landi Kotal region should be made! cheers :)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.228.164.238 (talk) 16:58, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Shinwari colonies in Lahore/Karachi

message: Please dont add non notable names of people to the list, only add people who already have existing Wikipedia entries/articles thanks 39.54.116.66 (talk) 06:09, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Non notables
Template talk:Unverified

message: Please replace this page with:  Melsaran 13:16, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 19:54, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request

message: The code in this template is causing error messages with Rdcheck. Please update the code to: #REDIRECT Template:Unreferenced because the colon should not be there right after the bracket. Thanks, --Funandtrvl (talk) 22:27, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This doesn't seem to be an isolated problem. Why doesn't Rdcheck get fixed to accept all valid variations of redirect syntax instead? Anomie⚔ 22:49, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 07 October 2011