Talk:Doodlebug

message: This article should be edited to be a more regular disambiguation page (see: WP:MOSDAB).  Articles on specific things called "doodlebug" can then have paranthetical qualifiers, such as Doodlebug (rail car) and Doodlebug (insect). -Acjelen 21:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe. It used to be so sub-stubby that breaking it up would be ridiculous, although a couple bits have been growing to the point where they might make barely passable stand-alones. - DavidWBrooks 01:04, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We could just leave the links as red, like above. -Acjelen 01:45, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: Since, as a typical American, I am ignorant of cricket, I did not know what "head high full toss" meant.  Neither the bowling, fielding, nor wicket keeping articles were much help.  Indeed, Fielding strategy (cricket) needs some work or merger with Fielding (cricket).  So, I did not know of a better article to disambiguate to than Max Walker. -Acjelen 02:04, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  head high full toss 

message: It's a shame that something so wonderful a community and art based website is being excluded from this encyclopedia.
http://doodleBug.desktopcreatures.com
doodleBug is a FREE website that allows users to create 'oodles of doodles' in an online archive.
a doodle on doodleBug is a drawing done with a UNIQUE 'playback' feature, that allows artists/observers to watch the progress and process of a doodle being sketched.
There are many benefits for artists wishing to improve, or just enjoy others artwork.
Each doodle at doodleBug, is able to be voted on by the doodleBug community participants.
This enables feedback and comments, thus allowing for input from outside sources, contructive criticism, and the joy of someone appreciating your style or artwork.
There are also competitions and a doodle based chat room, that are super fun and engage this community to it's fullest potential.
Once again, this is a NON-Commercial website and is certainly in the spirits of other such websites that are listed within Wikipedias online encyclopedia, including others such as iSketch and Oekaki boards.
I hope that someone will reconsider allowing doodleBug to be listed in an article for this encyclopedia.  As it's a one of a kind type of website and has a huge following and community that cares about it's livelyhood and place in internet history.
Thanks for your time and consideration,
RedSodaPop (Artist and doodleBug member)
Word from another member:
I was very suprised to see that my article on this website was deleted. I can understand how it could be considered spam just from glancing at it, but I assure you, the article I wrote was not intended for advertisement. I even forgot to include the URL! Our inspiration for adding doodleBug to Wikipedia was that a member saw iSketch.net (doodleBug members' favorite alternate site) listed in Wiki, and we thought it would be fun to be listed too. The thing that caught my attention the most was that the deletion notice for the article pointed out that doodleBug is an "unremarkable" website. I beg your pardon, even with a biased opinion - doodleBug has appeared in several printed magazines and popular "fun link" sites. This isn't just some site where a couple of random people post a few scraps of art.
(Maybe not as well written at RedSodaPop's argument, but I thought I would defend the article I wrote.)
Greenscaled
Word for another Member/One of the Site Admins: 
Here are some statistics: 
1.  Searching Google ("Doodlebug") returns a number 2 result as seen here: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Doodlebug
2.  Searching Yahoo ("Doodlebug") returns a number 1 result as seen here:  http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=Doodlebug&fr=yfp-t-501&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8
3.  Searching Ask ("Doodlebug") returns a number 4 result as seen here:  http://www.ask.com/web?q=Doodlebug&qsrc=0&o=333&l=dir&sugreqs=4
4.  Users can be found in almost every continent across the globe as seen here:  http://doodlebug.desktopcreatures.com/stuff/map/
5.  Alexa traffic Rankings can be found here (Alexa lists doodle bug with a ranking of 86,407): http://doodlebug.desktopcreatures.com/photos/images/eckitis-06720bfe90a765f6cb2d652157affd70.jpg
6.  The website can appear to plain if you do not have an account, here is a screenshot to show the website:  http://doodlebug.desktopcreatures.com/photos/images/eckitis-28f3ffec26fb2da68d9c59f0e7661a11.jpg
7.  There are 459 members that have been active in the past 30 days (from today's date 12/1/2006), of those 459 members 122 of them were active in the past 24 hours and 271 have been active in the past week. This information can be found here: http://doodlebug.desktopcreatures.com/members/index.asp?online=30&s=&submit=submit
8.  The websites created by the owner of this site has been featured in the following: 
      • plime.com
      • FARK.com
      • RealTechNews.com
      • Metafilter.com
      • DailyCandy.com
      • Times Newspaper
      • Bliss Magazine
      • FHM UK 3/2006
      • Revolution Magazine
      • G4TV (attack of the show "Gems of the Internet")
9.  Stats of the site in the passed 24 hours are as follows:  Doodles added: 25, Votes cast: 2,072, Messages posted: 902 
10.  Samples of the artwork created can be found here:  http://images.google.com/images?svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&rls=GGLG%2CGGLG%3A2006-12%2CGGLG%3Aen&q=doodlebug+_doodles
Personal Note:  The sentiments above are an attempt to display the love of the site shared by all of its members.  The site continues to grow and has a solid community base.  Inclusion of this site on Wikipedia may have been viewed as an advertisement and breaking the "Wikipedia is not a soapbox" rule, however the submission to Wikipedia was discussed in our forums as a way to acknowledge the hundreds of members who adore the site; many of those are Wikipedia users have found many of their other loves sites included here. 
I ask you to take the time and review what I have provided and what others may provide... in that, I ask you to reconsider the deletion of the entry.  If we need to reword the entry, or if there are specific things we need to remove from the entry we will be glad to do so. 
Sincerely,
Eckitis
Sabrina
:The only one of those that shows any sort of notability is #8. Could you please cite sources for when Doodlebug was mentioned in those publications? --Wooty Woot? contribs 23:46, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  doodleBug website exclusion from article. 

message: I'm surprised there are no links to winged insects here – the V-1 at least is meant to have taken its nickname from sounding like one or other large flying insect with loud, slow-beating wings.  Suggestions are welcome. – Regregex (talk) 20:17, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Nm.  Having removed the word 'larva', the entry for Antlion serves the purpose. – Regregex (talk) 21:11, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winged insects 

message: Ciara Brady is listed twice, someone should remove the duplicate. 75.169.53.8 (talk) 03:28, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: – Regregex (talk) 08:48, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ciara Brady