lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Vajradhara

message: *The Vajracchedika Prajnaparamita Sutra
*The Diamond Sutra
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.200.77 (talk) 09:40, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Austerlitz -- 88.75.200.77 (talk) 21:06, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vajradhara/teachings

message: , , Anuttarayoga Tantra, ,, ,  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.75.74.177 (talk) 09:01, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Austerlitz -- 88.75.222.144 (talk) 09:42, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mother father tantras 

message: Svabavikhaya,  svabhavikakaya (Tib. ngo wo nyi kyi ku), ngo bo nyid kyi sku - svabhavikakaya
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.207.205 (talk) 12:31, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Essence 

message: "Vajradhara is the primordial buddha, the dharmakaya buddha. Vajradhara, depicted as dark blue in color, expresses the quintessence of buddhahood itself. Vajradhara represents the essence of the historical Buddha's realization of enlightenment."
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.76.245 (talk) 15:26, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Adibuddha]]

message: *
*
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.76.245 (talk) 20:40, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vajra

message: Dharmakaya, Sambhogakaya, Nirmanakaya. When Vajradhara is Dharmakaya, what about the other two bodhis?
* "In Vajrayogini practice, we visualize our Guru as Buddha Vajradharma, who is the manifestation of the speech of all the Buddhas." from New Kadamapa site Liverpool
Do bodhi, speech and mind correspond to one of those kayas only/always?
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.88.169 (talk) 10:47, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Austerlitz -- 88.75.88.169 (talk) 11:05, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Austerlitz -- 88.72.29.200 (talk) 14:02, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trikayas

message: * 
"In Vajrayogini practice, we visualize our Guru as Buddha Vajradharma, who is the manifestation of the speech of all the Buddhas.
He has a red coloured body, one face, and two hands, which are crossed at his heart and hold a vajra and bell. He is the same nature as Conqueror Vajradhara and looks exactly like him, except that he is red and adorned with six bone ornaments, whereas Buddha Vajradhara is blue and wears jewelled ornaments." 
Once I've read somewhere that Vajradharma is thought to be the Buddha of the Mother tantras; i cannot find this anymore though.
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.199.108 (talk) 17:36, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vajradharma

message: *
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.213.192 (talk) 11:48, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Some news on Vajradhara

message: in China and Japan, Vajradhara is not the buddha, he is only a deity. Their view don't show in this article.--Alfredo ougaowen (talk) 02:21, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different meaning
Talk:Erodium cicutarium

message: I replaced :File:Erodium cicutarium Negev.JPG, which doesn't look at all like this species to me:
* the petals are too wide, too full
* the petals should not have a dark central mark
* the petals should be zygomorphic: the upper two differing slightly from the bottom three.
Look at all the other photos in commons:Category:Close-ups of Erodium cicutarium flowers. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:52, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrectly identified image
Talk:Carter Albrecht

message: New Bohemians article says Carter Albrecht is a *former* member. FYI. WiccaWeb
Bands  web site states he was the current keyboardist and had been since 1999.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.184.84.42 (talk) 15:16, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Bohemians 

message: Here's an interesting quote from a story at ABC:
:But Rathbone said that almost immediately after starting the drug, they started having vivid, often-frightening dreams — a known side effect of the medication.
Linky: http://www.abcnews.go.com/GMA/OnCall/story?id=3623085&page=1
~ WiccaWeb 03:44, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In another article (I can't find it right now), she describes the dreams they were having as "nightmarish and hallucinatory." I will try to dig up that quote when I get some time.K. Scott Bailey 03:52, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chantix
Talk:Go.com

message: As a member of the GO.com launch team, what I remember is that Jeff Gold owned the domain "GO.com" and got snookered by a lawyer who didn't reveal that he was representing Disney into selling it to the mouse for practically nothing. I'm pretty sure none of whatever he was doing with the site was retained. Might be hard to prove either way, but that line in this article reads like some serious self-fluffing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.233.132 (talk) 19:42, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jeff Gold seems to have seriously inflated his role in GO.com 

message: As of today(or maybe the past few days), go.com now delivers Disney content.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.120.31.18 (talk) 00:04, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just switched over 

message: Go.com had a chat feature, one room was TeenTalk - I was a user, as a minor. It was completely unmoderated and often contained material you would have found on 4chan some years later.  I don't have a point other than some quasi archival nostalgia about the early web, and some curiosity if anyone else remembers it. 70.53.99.237 (talk) 04:03, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  TeenTalk
Talk:Suzy Q

message: Please note that the cited source is no longer valid (link broken)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fox Wilson (talk • contribs) 02:08, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source
Talk:Strange Angels (Kristin Hersh album)

message: Hi, the robot is confused since the article is corrently very short and contains mainly the track listing, which is obviously the same as the amazon page. Thanks, Gazebotree 15:22, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Huntington High School (New York)

message: If you look further you will see the Huntington School district dates back 350 years started in 1657.
:Yeah, but the buildingb doesn't.Tailsfan2 (talk) 01:06, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  100 years 

message: I would like to establish consensus to stop the edit-warring over whether to include the "Controversy" section. I believe nobody has broken the three-revert rule yet, so I hope we can settle this before that happens.
Pings: @Huntingtonisracist; @Bdl11387; @Oinoinoiandsoin; @Super Cyclonic Storm Corona; @174.244.128.157; @Biglittlehugesmall65; @173.3.130.201; @Iflaq; @Skingo12; @174.244.128.157.
Question: Should  be included in the article?
— Twassman | Talk | Contribs 00:21, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: While this IP has reverted thrice, this does not break the 3RR, as s/he has not performed more than three reverts. — Twassman | Talk | Contribs 00:39, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit warring over removal of "Controversy" section
Talk:Irvine family of California

message: If James Irvine emmigrated to the US from Ireland in the 1840ties, how could he be born  in the 1860ties?  Whoever wrote this article is erroneously merging James Irvine Sr. and James Irvine, Jr.into one person.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.54.97.150 (talk) 22:19, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I will fix it.  This page is about James Irvine II (Jr and Sr are bad because James II had a son James III (Jase), (1894-1935) so James II was known as Sr and Jr at different times, the article titles should be changed.John Z (talk) 02:19, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Revised to separate out James I, II  and III.  They and the Irvine ranch are so inter related, that they probably should in the same article like this (and not have separate pages).Emargie (talk) 21:01, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: James Irvine Sr. and James Irvine, Jr.
Talk:Jim Moran (businessman)

message: Restored passages of article removed by User:CRTJMF and notified user on his/her talk page.Mgreason (talk) 16:58, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:James Scurlock

message: This reads not like a biography in an encyclopedia but a shameless self-promotion, complete with a list of articles by Scurlock along with reviews of his oeuvres as "external links". Can someone unaffiliated with this self-promoting charlatan please edit the article?
98.110.194.65 (talk) 03:07, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Polishing of Metal

message: OK, I have entered the first edit of the Polishing of Metal document. It would be a true shame if this item didn't get its due in the archives of history.
Please excuse any errors, I have tried hard to make it as Wiki as possible. I also tried to avoid hype and advertising like words. I will be making further minor edits as I discover the need.
Pictures were used by permission of the owner.
I am a huge fan of this project and of this author's work in general and did some research for my own archives so decided to share them here. Information is derived from interview sessions with the people involved as well as information at the Emperor Multimedia website for the project. All sources quoted in the article I have copies of in my possession. The creation of this project was a well documented one and I will share more sources of the displayed information as they become available.
--Skelizuma 18:29, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yi mein

message: What is the diameter/width of this noodle? Similar to lo mein or ramen? Badagnani 16:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I want to say half a centimeter. Benjwong 17:33, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe 3 mm, then? That's cooked, not dry, correct? Maybe you can measure it to make sure. Badagnani 17:38, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 5mm uncooked and 3mm cooked.  They do shrink so I guess that is fair. Benjwong 21:04, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Specifications

message: Are these the type of noodles that have been caught being produced with artificial yellow coloring rather than egg on a number of occasions? Badagnani 16:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not that I am aware of. Benjwong 17:33, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here are some examples of noodles seized for containing tartrazine (Yellow no. 5) (do a CTRL-F search for "noodle"). None of the noodles seized were labeled as "E-fu," though. Badagnani 17:49, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope don't see anything close to yi mein on the list. Benjwong 21:04, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Next time you're in the Asian supermarket, can you check the ingredients to see if any brands use artificial yellow coloring? Badagnani 23:31, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coloring

message: Important to note the tradition (esp since some sources will cite it confidently, leading to later edits here) but this article brings up and debunks various origin stories of yimian. — LlywelynII 09:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:James Strachey

message: Is the use of this term to refer to Freud really an example of unbiased information-giving?Historian932 (talk) 23:27, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Master"? 

message: Should be at least a small section on this, will try to get to it myself when I have some more time.Historian932 (talk) 23:27, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on controvery about (over)scientizing Freud 

message: This article has little to no citation and considering the scholarship surrounding the problems of translation by Strachey, I don't take this biography seriously at all. Someone needs to rework with more references.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.89.212.107 (talk) 13:14, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Citation 
Talk:James W. Kynes

message: Any examples of his "iron man determination" or whatever on the field which makes him the name for the best Gators OLineman of the year? Cake (talk) 23:44, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Kynes Award
Talk:William Hopkinson Cox

message: A local history book from the 1800s is not a reliable source for an 800 year genealogical descent.  Further, the cited source is imprecise.  "...tracing back their relationship to William the Conqueror" is meaningless, grammatically.  It could imply that they trace a descent from William the Conqueror, it could be referring to 'back to the time of William the Conqueror'.  This source  says of the Cox family "came over with William the Conqueror", which is more akin to the second than to the first.  Such a descent, even were it true, was part and parcel of 19th century historiography of which the source is an example, but is not what modern historians consider noteworthy, DYK notwithstanding.  Agricolae (talk) 01:33, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claimed ancient origins
Talk:Jamie Kennedy (chef)

message: He has three sons and owns a summer property in Hillier, Ontario.  Sometimes he participates in Hillier community events (i.e. Hillier in the Park Day) and supplies food. Glandrid (talk) 04:26, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool, but we need sources. There is a fish fry mentioned in the Picton County News.  --  Zanimum (talk) 17:31, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal Info
Talk:Nintendo GameCube Preview Disc

message: I doubt any of the keep-voters will make any reasonable attempt to fix this article, I'm going to give them the benefit of the doubt, and hope that they (or others) will do so. I'll give this one month before renomination for deletion. If this article is properly sourced and provides sources for its notability, provides any reception for it, and expands it to more than a three paragraph lead and three lists, I'll leave it alone. Otherwise, I should hope you won't vote keep. - A Link to the Past (talk) 01:01, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh. My. God. This is horrible. People will jump on a grenade to save this article, but they won't lift a finger to make it GOOD? So basically, you just want to keep suck on Wikipedia. There hasn't been an edit since a little after I left Wikipedia. It appears to me that people care only about keeping it on Wikipedia, not making it a good article. Why are you protecting an article you care barely more than I do about? - A Link to the Past (talk) 18:12, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Three AfDs and no one added a single source establishing notability? Great to know that a million people with horrible/nonexistent arguments wins over one person with a good one. Just so you know, I will be AfDing this article once every month until it is deleted or the problem no longer exists. And knowing the people who support this article, they don't care enough about fixing the problem as much as keeping the problem alive. - A Link to the Past (talk) 17:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvement
Talk:Jan Mohammad Khan

message: Somebody removed the picture of Jan Mohammed, without offering any explanation.
I have restored it.  I encourage other wikipedians to explain themselves when they make edits like this.
Cheers!  Geo Swan (talk) 16:30, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: revert unexplained edit

message: I have removed the addition by AlimNaz today that analysed Khan's death.  This is to explain why;
* it was original research.
* it included unsourced analysis of his assassination from a religious and political viewpoint.  Where is this analysis from?  To be in the article it would need to be from recognised authorities on Islam and Afghan politics.
Thanks. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 20:51, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Analysis of assassination  

message: The last section in the article about his death is more like a news service. Please modify and refine it. It seems quite un suitable.
Dr Pukhtunyar Afghan (talk) 22:40, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki News service 
Talk:Religious interpretations of the Big Bang theory

message: The introductory paragraph for this section subtly lacks some much needed neutrality... It's not blatant, but feels like it needs to be reworded so it doesn't make non-followers of the Big Bang seem denounced or any less credible. This goes for the last sentence in particular. Z Coop (talk) 02:19, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introductory Paragraph Needs Rewording 

message: Does anyone know of any sources stating the interpretation of the Big Bang theory in the Pastafarianism religion. Because that would be interesting... :) Polyamorph (talk) 15:47, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Clearly this theory requires His Noodly Appendage. 72.224.172.14 (talk) 21:08, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flying Spaghetti Monster 

message: I'd say that the article's view of Zoroastrian understanding of the universe is quite flawed and there seem to be no references for it. As far as I know Zoroastrians basically believe that Ahura Mazda created the universe with His Spenta Mainyu and through divine emanations at some point of time from our perspective and that there will be an apocalypse known as Frashokereti which however will not be the end of the world but rather its completion. Therefore Zoroastrianism actually does not conflict with the Big Bang much or at all --80.221.255.80 (talk) 00:25, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zoroastrianism 
Talk:Bruce Wilshire

message: I'm restoring the philosophy of science category, which was understandably removed for lacking evidence. Here's an excerpt from Fashionable Nihilism:
[Scientism] is the view that only science can know. Scientism cannot be supported by science itself. For to substantiate the claim that other ways of knowing are fraudulent, or at least unreliable, would require that science pursue these putative ways of knowing and determine that they get us nowhere. But to pursue these other ways reliably would require science to abandon its own proven methods and scope of validity. Or, science would be required to rule a priori and arbitrarily that the other ways couldn't possibly be effective in their subject matter areas. Either way, science oversteps itself. Scientism is ideology, not science. The simple fact is, not all questions or issues can be resolved by any single method, scientific or otherwise.
Most of the book is loosely related to the philosophy of science, that is just an example of a particularly explicit excerpt. — xDanielx T/C 18:34, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Philosophy of science]] category 
Talk:Chandre Oram

message: Just wanted to note that Ananova is not particularly reliable, as sources go. That should probably be replaced by something else, if possible. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 16:32, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have made a few small edits to help the article flow better (if you check the History you can see that), but there are part of the article in which I'm unsure what the original author is trying to say, and so I have left those sections alone. WikiReaderer 21:38, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit
Talk:Jan Żabiński

message: https://www.haaretz.com/1.4994531 Xx236 (talk) 12:16, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Code Name Fox 

message: Please add a link to Szymon Tenenbaum, to encourage article creation.  There's a Polish Wikipedia article about him already.  See https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q9352724 2601:5C6:8081:35C0:70:119A:E12B:D76 (talk) 11:45, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done – Thjarkur (talk) 12:51, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 August 2020 

message: Add link to the foundation: https://www.zabinskifoundation.org/ 2600:8800:5123:9800:4AD:F684:B64C:8763 (talk) 23:15, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:02, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 April 2021 

message: Please add link to Józef Żabiński, the father of Jan Żabiński. Information in Polish from Jan Żabiński (1897–1974) – zoolog, wizjoner, Polak, demokrata... Szelma W (talk) 21:03, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: ARandomName123 (talk) 15:08, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 29 May 2023
Talk:Jane Dammen McAuliffe

message: It seems to me that most of the text in this article was copied verbatim from .  If so, it is a copyright violation.  It seems possible that Bryn Mawr might be willing to license the text of that page to us under the GFDL.  Someone should either rewrite the article or request permission from BMC.  —Dominus (talk) 05:31, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation? 
Talk:Janet Nutter

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:46, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Janice Burgess

message: I mean, i saw some accounts saying that on Twitter, but then i tried to check out the news and found nothing Fargopedia (talk) 02:26, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if she actually passed away. ElfieWolfie08 (talk) 02:47, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  She really passed out??????? 

message: Like what the post on top of my post said, did she really pass away? ElfieWolfie08 (talk) 02:45, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: We should combine these threads into one. If we can get a more reputable source, we could probably put in on the article, but as for now all there are are questionable tweets. Pineappman (talk) 03:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You know what, that's a good idea. Yeah, those are questionable tweets confusing us editors. ElfieWolfie08 (talk) 04:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I guess we have confirmation now. Pineappman (talk) 06:07, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, she actually passed away. ElfieWolfie08 (talk) 17:33, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death? 

message: Like, any personal sources? Maddox121 ForgotHisPassword (talk) 03:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know, I searched up and did not find anything. ElfieWolfie08 (talk) 03:31, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

text: https://www.instagram.com/p/C4GKvGyL-si/ 2806:108E:13:5402:3D4D:B79B:A958:8263 (talk) 03:33, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any proof other than Twitter/X post accounts?
Talk:Janice leMaistre

message: I think this needs to go to AfD, at the very least. On my reading of WP:JUDGE, she would indeed be presumed notable, as she is a judge of a provincewide court, which is specifically covered by that notability guideline:
"The following are presumed to be notable:
Politicians and judges who have held international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office, and members or former members of a national, state or provincial legislature".
I will de-PROD all the articles of judges of provincial courts for the same reason. RebeccaGreen (talk) 10:58, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROD removal