lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Galdhøpiggen

message: The link to Snøhetta is wrong, it leads to an architecture office, not the mountain. I tried to fix it, but it all went wrong... :|
I've heard that it's the highest mountain in northern Europe, but am unsure of the precise definition - presumably, north of the Alps?  Also, is there still a small shop selling T shirts at the top?--JBellis 18:06, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not only the Alps, also the Carpathians (Gerlachovský štít reaches 2655 m). --Stemonitis 08:49, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong link 

message: The claim that 35,000 sq.km are visible is nonsense. This would represent the equivalent of everything within a radius of more than 100km. While the mean horizon distance is about 100 km (see external link), most of the intervening ground is hidden by their surrounding ranges and in therefore not visible. There are no plains visible from the summit. Viewfinder 06:24, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area visible from summit 
Talk:Mount Bintumani

message: Bintumani peace one 41.223.132.201 (talk) 16:28, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bintumani peace one
Talk:Dinara

message: The second sentence in the lede states that the mountain is "shaped like a human head made of stone".  This claim is both un-sourced and redundant (what difference is there between something in the shape of "a human head", and something in the shape of "a human head made of stone"?)  Furthermore, neither the photos in the article, nor those in the off-site articles referenced, seem to appear anything like a human head.  If someone can't wikify the claim, I'll remove it. Bricology (talk) 16:42, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Shaped like a human head"? 

message: "Its Latin name is Adrian oros". Oros is Greek, and Adrian is the modern form for Hadrianus -Adrianós in Modern Greek.--Manfariel (talk) 14:01, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:Mount Richard-Molard

message: The article is categorized under Guinea–Liberia border, Ivory Coast–Liberia border and Border tripoints. Is this correct? As I understand from OpenStreetMap, the peak would be some 7 km northeast from the tripoint (while the Nimba range certainly extends to Liberia). Also The World Factbook  says Liberia's highest point is Mount Wuteve 1,380 m, implying that Liberia does not extend up to Mount Richard-Molard (1752 m). --Jmk (talk) 01:13, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Also Geography and Environment of Northern Nimba County, Liberia  by the Western Range DSO Iron Ore Project says (emphasis mine): "The mountains’ highest point is 1752m above sea level, on the Guinean section of the main Nimba ridge, and is known as Mount Richard-Molard; in Liberia, the highest point is 1300m on the same ridge, and referred to in this document as ‘Mount Nimba’."  Thus I will remove the Liberia and tripoint classes from Richard-Molard. --Jmk (talk) 07:55, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that there is difference between mountain including its slopes and base and its peak. The peak is certainly only shared by 2 countries, but for the whole mountain it still might be 3 countries. From what I've seen elsewhere Mt. Nimba is actually used as an alternative name for Mt. Richars-Molard (as well?) rather than for a separate mountain on the Liberian side.--Kmhkmh (talk) 13:35, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly a mountain's slopes could extend to a tripoint even if the summit is not there (Mont Dolent being a good example). But I have not seen any source for this being the case with Mount Richard-Molard, and from the maps I've seen, it does not even seem likely. If you have good sources about the extent of what is called "Mount Richard-Molard" (as opposed to the whole Nimba Range), by all means edit the article based on those sources. --Jmk (talk) 20:11, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Country borders
Category talk:Non-free newspaper covers

message: Note that this is intended for tagging images, using Template:Newspapercover. Please do not stick this category on articles. -- Jmabel | Talk 04:00, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)
This is a newspaper cover. It is believed that newspaper covers may be exhibited on Wikipedia under the fair use provision of United States copyright law. See Copyrights. Does this include English newspaper covers? Fethroesforia 01:25, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Cerro de Punta

message: In the warmest month, the mean of the lowest and highest temperatures appears to be 21.5C, and that in the coldest month is below 18C.  Thus, going by the Koppen climate chart, the top of the mountain actually has a Cfb climate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.84.22.213 (talk) 02:47, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Af climate? 

message: The chart must be shwoing extremes not averages; it shows a 25 F (14 C) variation in the winter months of 41 low (5C) and a daytime high near 68 (20C). Tropical highlands are nominally colder per elevation but still don't have large day or seasonal ranges. B137 (talk) 02:52, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  climate chart
Talk:Rate equation (chemistry)

message: Oh man, what did i just do. So apparently i can't read well enough and i figured when i moved the rate equation page it owuld just merge and all and now i have no idea how to just undo what i just did. ..yikes.. i'm so sorry. someone please help..
--Michael 04:05, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)
I posted a request for help at Wikipedia:Help desk#Unsuccessfull merge. Now I have no clue what happened but maybe this will make you feel better: there is the possiblility of bugs in the move system. Jan van Male 09:30, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: Why does "Chemical Kinetics" redirect here when we have an article "Chemical kinetics?" Shouldn't the redirect be to that page? Gershwinrb 05:05, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, apparently someone's fixed that. Gershwinrb 04:22, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh?
Talk:Doodlez

message: I'm unfamiliar with these, but are they made directly for television? The animated film series category is for animated short subjects that were released to theaters (i.e. Looney Tunes, Popeye, Woody Woodpecker.) --FuriousFreddy 04:06, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Do they make new episodes of Doodlez? - no account
:To my knowledge, no. Which is unfortunate. :( Knuckles sonic8 02:12, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Episodes? 

message: I think an episode guide should be added to improve the article's quality. Knuckles sonic8 02:13, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Episodes

message: i would like to see some pictures of this "doodette" for i have not seen a picture of her yet-olly
im not sure if they can post pictures on wikipedia for i am new to it...but if they can post pictures i would like it if they had pictures of the caracters i nthe caracter section of this article.(Olly124 00:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures of "fin" 

message: i agree with every one here. episode guide and pictures. yay!24.144.137.244 04:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  yeah
Talk:Tai Mo Shan

message: 大霧山 is not the correct name in Chinese. It's just a misconception, perhaps because of the similar pronunciation with 大帽山. -- LR4087 12:35, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: It would be nice if there was a history section of this article. --66.134.52.222 00:17, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: I've added a fact tag to the statement that the summit is occupied by a satellite compound. The term is a bit vague, as it could mean a compound that is a satellite of another establishment, or a compound containing equipment to communicate with satellites.
I'm guessing that the author meant the latter, but I have my doubts. There is no particular advantage to situating an satellite uplink on top of a mountain (1000m elevation is insignificant compared to the distance to geo-stationary orbit), and lots of obvious practical disadvantages. The photograph with the article shows what looks like radar equipment to me, which makes more sense in terms of needing altitude.
So all in all, I think a cite would help. -- Starbois (talk) 10:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now found a cite and added it. It says the summit is occupied by the military, which certainly wasn't clear from the article as it stood. Obviously if it is a military establishment, we are pretty unlikely to find a citable source saying exactly what goes on there, so it is best to settle with just military. I've amended the text in line with the cite. -- Starbois (talk) 16:53, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Satellite compound 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20031213065741/http://parks.afcd.gov.hk/newparks/eng/country/cps/cp_tms.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (Unfortunately, while this content was licensed for non-commercial use, Wikipedia does require license for commercial use.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:El Cerro del Aripo

message: Somebody who have edited this topic... ARE YOU REALLY SERIOUS??? Who are you trying to fool? SNOW IS INEXISTEN IN T&T!
Stop trying to put fake sources! The whole topic it's gonna be fixed! --200.8.37.151 (talk) 22:58, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Good job here and a great catch. But really, you don't need to SHOUT it. The dubious climate edits in question were made by the clown , who also happens to be a suspected sock of , who has been blocked for vandalism and BLP violations. Thank you for your efforts 200.8.37.151. --RacerX11 Talk to meStalk me  23:33, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

text: Hmm.. looks like I should have checked things further  previously when removing those frosty images labelled "Snow on the Peek". Keep on keepin on ... Vsmith (talk) 00:50, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  SNOW? UNDER 0ºC TEMPERATURES? WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS ARTICLE??? 

message: The elevation 940 metres is sourced. If that is incorrect a new reference will be required. Vsmith (talk) 00:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peak elevation
Talk:Mount Usborne

message: If anyone could find a free image of the mountain, that would be an excellent addition to this article. Zaldax (talk) 12:10, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free image? 
Talk:New Media art

message: * Removed the link someone added to http://www.imagesfestival.com: "largest Canadian festival for new media and installation arts". If the article goes down that path it will be a huge list of links to every country's major festival (I know just in my region Thailand, Australia and NZ all have websites that could be linked if this is allowed). I say leave it to the main festival in Linz and list none others unless they're significantly worthwhile --Heyseuss 04:25, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links
Category talk:Mathematics stubs

message: *This category was previously known as :Category: Math stubs. It was listed for renaming on March 22, 2005. The following discussion supported the renaming (please do not modify).
:Category: Math stubs also seems wrong, for two reasons. Firstly, "Math" is a very Americocentric abbreviation (the rest of the English speaking world uses "Maths", as there is no such thing as a mathematic). Secon, it should have the full name (:Category: Mathematics stubs) anyway.  Grutness|hello?  02:50, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former Category renaming 

message: I wrote a math stub, and it put e^{i \pi} in front where it said that it was a stub.  This could get confusing if you have written a stub with an equation and then you are wondering where the e came from! can the logo be put in a box (like border) or something so that it does not look like regular text?daviddoria (talk) 15:33, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing logo

message: Several times I have seen articles classified as stubs that had multiple refs and multiple sections. Each word is a separate link, by the way. These examples came from a tiny section of the first page. If I were a member of the Mathematics project, I'd reassess all these so we'd know how many stubs we really have. That said, I don't know what the standards are and I don't want to step on anyone's toes. Thoughts?--Rmky87 (talk) 04:25, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Overestimation of stubs
Talk:Alexine Tinne

message: I could not get this article to come up searching by Alexandrine Tinee, Tinne or Alexandrine, which i find strange. In the end, I had to comb though all of the articles alphabetically, but only because i already knew it existed. Frustrating.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.245.0.24 (talk • contribs).
:Searching without the accent works now, as work has been done to create redirect pages (without accents) for people whose names include accented letters.--Slyguy 20:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added a verify tag to the page because I noticed that the birth year (1835) specified under her image is in conflict with the introductory sentence (that she was born in 1839) and with the included "1839 births" category.  In the external link, it says that she was 22 in 1857, suggesting that the 1835 date is the correct one.  Could someone research this?  Thanks.--Slyguy 19:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thought, a self-contradiction tag would be more appropriate here, so I'll do that instead...--Slyguy 01:28, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Somebody (not me) corrected the birthyear already to 1835. I can vouch for that, too. See , which is in Dutch, but one can easily recognize the dates. I think the contradiction-tag is superfluous now, so I removed it.--Ereunetes (talk) 19:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth 

message: Dutch texts say Tinne, this page too. What is the source of Tinné?Xx236 (talk) 11:36, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  é ?
Talk:Kelly Freas

message: Kelly Freas was placed into two "scientologist" categories. I was tempted to remove it, not because of any knowledge of the subject but because it was not mentioned in the article, and I don't think categories should introduce new information. However, I've since found page http://www.nndb.com/people/092/000085834/ "His widow states that Freas was not a Scientologist". The information there is interesting, and could belong in the article. Notinasnaid 16:37, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "scientologist"

message: I changed the attribution of Freas as Alfred E Neuman's creator.  The image, as related in the Wikipedia enty for AEN, was "found" in old advertising material, and adopted to the comics in line drawing by Bill Elder.  Norman  Mingo did the first MAD magazine cover featuring Alfred.  Freas' version, used early in the character's association with MAD, was great, though. Kevrob 20:35, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Work for MAD

message: What is this supposed to mean "No other artist in science fiction has consistently matched his record." Whelan has 24/13 nominations/wins and Eggleton has 19/8. Freas has my favorite since I was a pre-teen, but this line doesn't really belong. Delfeye 20:08, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV?

message: Hi there, I've just deleted that image from this page. Please feel free to use it and add it again. Just next time can someone add a fair use rationale with reference to its use in this article, or it will be deleted. Cheers GiantSpider (talk) 17:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: News of the World Cover
Talk:Michael O'Donoghue

message: This article needs a lot more about O'Donoghue's work on National Lampoon. This was at least half of his career and it gets only a brief mention. MK2 05:37, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: National Lampoon

message: The reason I've changed "External links" to "References" comes from these sections of Wikipedia:Cite_sources, quoted verbatim below. (Please note in Item 2 below that the italics are theirs, and not inserted by me.) Thanks!
1)
:Complete citations in a "References" section
:Complete citations, also called "references," are collected at the end of the article under a ==References== heading. Under this heading, list the comprehensive reference information as a bulleted (*) list, one bullet per reference work.
2) 
:External links/Further reading
:The ==External links== or ==Further reading== section is placed after the references section, and offers books, articles, and links to websites related to the topic that might be of interest to the reader, but which have not been used as sources for the article. Where there is a references section, editors may prefer to call the external links section "further reading," because the references section may also contain external links, and the further reading section may contain items that are not online.
:So sources used to write an article go under "References", and other helpful citations go under "External links" if they're linkable and "Further reading" if they're not online. — Tenebrae 21:31, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The sources listed in references would be better placed as inline citations, instead of simply listed. The way they are presented, they are basically "Further reading" links, and not truly references, because they are not referencing specific statements in the article. Thus, I have added the tag to move these into inline citations. This person was well-enough known that there should be no shortage of online articles or sources that can be put as templates to cite passages. Ariel♥Gold 05:27, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "References" vs. "External links"

message: I have removed the "Death" section completely from the article, because it is unsourced, speculative, and gives no references. Please review WP:OR and WP:RS for additional information. This section should not be added into the article unless it can be sourced well, and attributed to the source. As it was, it was purely speculation. The only person who could have possibly known what happened that night is his wife, and unless she has given that information to the press, it is unverifiable. Ariel♥Gold 05:16, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research, sourcing, and speculation 

message: See Talk:Mr. Mike: The Life and Work of Michael O'Donoghue#Merge to Michael O'Donoghue. <FONT FACE="Poor Richard" SIZE="-1" COLOR="red">Mitch</FONT><FONT FACE="Georgia" SIZE="-1" COLOR="black">32(Never support those who think in the box)</FONT> 23:56, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Usarp Mountains

message: Since the name is actually an acronym, shouldn't this page be moved to USARP Mountains? or has common usage changed the acronym to a proper noun per this entry, i.e., Usarp? Deirdre 23:24, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  USARP or Usarp? 

message: — Assignment last updated by ANA.B2004 (talk) 14:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Composition II
Talk:Apicomplexa

message: The first sentence might mislead to the conclusion that the apical complex is the same as the apicoplast. This should be clarified.--131.152.195.24 (talk) 15:33, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Apical complex / Apicoplast

message: This page should say how many species are found in the phylum. --Savant13 20:03, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of Species

message: The article deceptively suggests that Apicomplexa is nonmotile, which is untrue...most are motile...Anyone up for changing it?...If not I'll pull out a few papers to refresh my memory when I have time Jarwulf 05:56, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on this glossary entry, I'd say nonmotility is definitive...? --Renice 19:37, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, but this suggests otherwise. --Renice 19:52, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Motility

message: Are Blastocystea Apicomplexa or Chromista? --Kupirijo 10:00, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Stramenopile, it seems pretty clear from the refs at Blastocystis (Chromista doesn't seem to be monophyletic, so I wouldn't use that term, per refs at Chromalveolate). If anyone knows of something we are missing, please provide specifics. I've updated this article accordingly. Kingdon (talk) 02:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blastocystea 

message: This page should be moved to Sporozoan. --Aruseusu (talk) 16:05, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Apicomplexa seems to be a much more common term these days (I tried a google scholar search).  Unless there is something I'm missing, it looks like a case where wikipedia needs to follow existing usage. Kingdon (talk) 19:12, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: This area is a mess. I am finding multiple contradictory references on this. I am working to resolve this. DrMicro (talk) 21:20, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxonomy

message: This article had a subclasses section that says there are four, and the taxobox is divided into different classes and subclasses.
===Taxonomy===
"The phylum is currently divided into four subclasses:"
*Adeleida
*Coccidea
*Gregarinea
*Haemosporidia
*Perkinsea
===Taxobox:===
*"subdivision_ranks = Classes & Subclasses"	
*"subdivision ="
*Aconoidasida
**Haemosporasina	
**Piroplasmasina
*Conoidasida
**Coccidiasina
**Gregarinasina
I've removed the taxonomy section, but left the taxobox, until it is corrected. Both should also have citations attached before replacing anything. --Kleopatra (talk) 18:54, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subclasses taxonomy - mess, this entire article needs in-line citations! 

message: *"subdivision_ranks = Classes & Subclasses"	
*"subdivision ="
*Aconoidasida
**Haemosporasina	
**Piroplasmasina
*Conoidasida
**Coccidiasina
**Gregarinasina
I've removed the taxonomy section, but left the taxobox, until it is corrected. Both should also have citations attached before replacing anything. --Kleopatra (talk) 18:54, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxobox: