lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pörkölt

message: In Hungary we are making difference between Gulyas, paprikas and pörkölt. Gulyas is water, meat, and a lot of onion (+ everything else), Paprikas is water, meat, potato-pasta (+ everything else), Pörkölt is meat and onion (+ everything else). Also on every of this it goes red ground (powder) paprika. This is 100% ----László (talk) 00:14, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Bogracs gulyas is not a soup it is a stew and that is what the rest of the world try to copy (not very well )they don't even know that Gulyas soup exist!
So when we talking about gulyas out side Hungary we refer to traditional Hungarian Bogracs Gulyas.Judit
Quite right. Judit!!!
Finally somebody who can se the difference.
Warrington (talk) 20:54, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The difference between Porkolt, Paprikas, etc. needs to be made more clear on these pages, because this page literally says it is not to be confused with Paprikas yet Paprikas redirects here. - A.J. (talk) 02:36, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

text: I think this is only adding to the confusion readers may have.  This article should just be merged into the Goulash article.  All three dishes (bogracsgulyas, paprikas, porkolt) are stews made by braising the meat with paprika.  --Stacey Doljack Borsody (talk) 03:05, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gulyas, Paprikas, Porkolt

message: In the Czech Republic pörkölt is made successfully with beer, dark bread and caraway.
This is a bit puzzling... where do you Czech people put the beer, in the stew or you are drinking it whith it?
Warrington (talk) 14:55, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Both. :-) And we call it goulash (guláš) (be it with beer (in stew) or not) :-)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.198.133.78 (talk) 06:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Czech pörkölt 

message: The picture that ought to depict tokany seems to show stippgruetze, a meal from Westphalia in Germany which has nothing to do with tokany.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.58.238.160 (talk) 18:45, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tokany-Picture
Talk:Shatila refugee camp

message: It says "The Sabra and Shatila massacre was the slaughter of between 762 and 3,500 civilians, mostly Palestinians and Lebanese Shiites, by the Hobeika-led militia and the IDF"
While the IDF shares responsibility in the massacre, the slaughter was not done by any IDF soldier. NadavNahari (talk) 06:22, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perpetrators of the massacre
Talk:Le Perthus

message: Le Perthus is partly in Spain - in fact most of the people who go there only do so to buy at cheaper Spanish prices.  Can anyone supply details of the Spanish authorities in addition to the French ones shown?
::Actually, Le Perthus is entirely in France.  The contiguous Spanish part of the town is called Els Límits. Emeraude (talk) 11:48, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Marching Chiefs

message: I've heard the story before, but don't know enough to write about it. Something about being invited to Saudi Arabia to play and ever since been introduced as the "World Renowned Marching Chiefs." Kushboy 00:33, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Renowned 

message: This version of the page from October 2009:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marching_Chiefs&oldid=323102575
sure had a lot of wonderful Chiefs history that is now deleted.  Anyone like to add it back?  TomTime0000 (talk) 21:38, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Much Chiefs History Was Deleted 

message: I think that the title of this article should be changed to a more specific "FSU Marching Chiefs" or "Florida State University Marching Chiefs," as there are other bands using the name, including a college in Wisconsin and a high school in Florida.  Anyone else agree?  TomTime0000 (talk) 21:38, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Marching Chiefs" Article Title? 

message: Removal of non-notable information. The table listing the complete history of the drum majors was removed in compliance with WP:INDISCRIMINATE--specifically the "who's who" section. Cmcginni (talk) 04:27, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drum Majors 

message: I'm currently working on a rewrite of the history section and it can be found here. Feel free to make comments on the talk page for it. Also, it is quite difficult to find sourcing for much of the stuff in there since it was originally directly from the Chiefs website. Any help with sourcing would be awesome. Ayzmo (talk) 02:43, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  History Section Rewrite. 

message: I went through and fixed a bunch of dead links and found new sources for things. However, a lot of citations for the early history of the Marching Chiefs are Wall of Fame profiles from band alumni association which has recently migrated to a new site. Their WOF is not yet up and running. Once it is, I will fix those links accordingly. Ayzmo (talk) 22:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Is the table in the drum majors section needed and is the sections section acceptable unsourced? Ayzmo (talk) 14:23, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I honestly think it's perfect. I saw it being removed the other and I looked all over the internet to see if there were any sources but I couldn't find anything. I hoping to email someone over there at Marching Chiefs soon to see if they would release official info. I think it should stay but that's my personal opinion. It's not hurting the integrity of the article.--SeminoleNation (talk) 16:59, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering the table and the Sections section are both unsourced, I'd suggest we remove both until we can find reliable sources to verify. Meatsgains (talk) 02:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC: Are the "Sections" and table in the drum major section acceptable?
Talk:The exchange (chess)

message: This article and Minor exchange are about similar things, and both are stubs.  I think they  should be merged. Bubba73 (talk), 00:33, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right.  But they are both only one paragraph, so maybe "minor exchange" can be a section in the article about the exchange.  Just something to consider, I don't think it is a big deal. Bubba73 (talk), 14:15, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I lean slightly towards merging, as they are so short.  But also agree either way is acceptable.  Baccyak4H 17:52, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Minor exchange is a nonsense term I've never heard or seen used before. It's not a common part of chess parlance and should be removed from wikipedia.
Btw - does anyone know the etymology of the term 'Exchange'? It's an odd term (as is 'quality' in Spanish) and perhaps therefore deserves an explanation.Tommy-Chivs 15:57, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This needs clarification:
:In the game Reshevsky-Petrosian, Zurich 1953, he sacrificed the exchange on move 25, only for his opponent to sacrifice it in return on move 30
24.Re3 Rd8 25.Rfe1 (diagram) Re6 26.a4 Ne7 27.Bxe6 fxe6 28.Qf1 Nd5 29.Rf3 Bd3 30.Rxd3 cxd3 http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1106248 The rook is moved to where it can be captured on move 25 but isn't captured by the bishop until move 27. --<SPAN STYLE="font-family:monospace; color:#008800; background-color:#ffffcc; border:1px solid #ff4444;"> B.D.Mills </SPAN> (T, C) 12:25, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reshevsky-Petrosian 1953 

message: Because of the importance and frequency of exchanges of pieces in chess, I've just written a new article called Exchange (chess) which covers all kinds of exchanges in chess in general.  I have not added any examples.  If anyone wants to add examples, please go ahead and do so.  
Eventually, some may think about merging this more specific article The exchange (chess) with the new generalized Exchange (chess) article.  I suppose it depends on the length of the two articles when the Exchange (chess) article is more complete with examples and references.  Maybe we can wait and see how things turn out.  In the meantime, if you ever need to make links to a general chess exchange article, Exchange (chess) is now available.  I must caution there is yet another redirect page called Exchange chess which leads to Bughouse chess, which is a variation of chess involving special rules on exchanges.  H Padleckas (talk) 08:09, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Exchange (chess)]]
Talk:Atom.com

message: I have removed the notability notice and added the buyout part, as it has been mentioned in many news articles; so it is in compliance with WP:WEB. --Simonkoldyk 00:39, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Sounds like copied from promotional text 62.206.21.253 (talk) 16:11, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 'award winning'

message: This line, "The buyout occurred shortly after negotiations against and subsequently with Google to purchase YouTube." is hard to decipher. Who was negotiating with whom? Focomoso (talk) 22:05, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Confused

message: Atom.com closed! Котёнок255 (talk) 15:57, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atom Closed 
Talk:Kolambugan

message: The Municipality of Kolambugan, the SARIMANOK Town of Lanao del Norte is one of the twenty two (22) towns in the Province of Lanao del Norte belonging to the Northern Mindanao which is in Region X. It is eventually the Mother Municipality of the province.
FESTIVAL: SARIMANOK FESTIVAL - Feel the heat of the SARIMANOK beat dancing down the streets offering thanksgiving of good harvest and harmonious relationship among Muslim and Christian Cultures. It is held every 1st of July.
POINT OF INTEREST
* Seaweeds Production
* DAIMA PORT (Ozamis - Kolambugan)
* Forest Park
* DAPIT ALIM Shrine
* Fish Caging
* Punta Reef - a fish sanctuary
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.84.180.234 (talk) 08:36, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 
Talk:Super Mario Bros. 4

message: I reverted your revert.  Reasons: Super Mario Bros. 4 is a pirated game that does actually exist.  And we in the English-speaking do NOT officially recognize Super Mario World as Super Mario Bros. 4. Marcus 00:59, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the HTML comment from the redirect page because the official use of this title (see section below) is preferred to the pirate game as a primary topic. --SoledadKabocha (talk) 01:06, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Pirate game that exists

message: This article should redirect to Super Mario World, not New Super Mario Bros.  Yes, I know that SMW is not called SMB4 in the English-speaking world, but it is called that in Japan, while NSMB isn't called SMB4 anywhere.  To be honest, I have no idea how anybody figured this should redirect to New Super Mario Bros. Jeff Silvers 13:44, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Really, could you source that? --FlareNUKE 00:13, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Ah. http://www.otakaraou.com/data/otakaraou/product/54e44e2872.jpg --FlareNUKE 00:16, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Super Mario Bros. vs Super Mario World
Talk:All Set

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:All Set.jpg, found on :All Set, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 17:05, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
Talk:Ceyhan River

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 19:01, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support for the title, although care is required for the content of related articles when they are writen from a historical viewpoint. It would be anachronistic to state that Alexander the Great crossed Ceyhan River. User:Cretanforever
*Support. Agree with Cretanforever. --Akhilleus (talk) 04:58, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Gihon? Böri (talk) 12:43, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the etymology of Ceyhan? 
Talk:Elisabeth Lutyens

message: How is this article written like a personal reflection or essay? What should be done about it? Hyacinth (talk) 03:18, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Essay

message: The article states that Lutyens continued her musical education from 1926 to 1930 at the Royal College of Music in London as a pupil of Harold Darke and Ernest Tomlinson.
The name Ernest Tomlinson inappropriately links to another Wikipedia article, about the Ernest Tomlinson I knew personally, who was born in 1926.  It seems unlikely that Lutyens received tuition from him when she was 20 and he was only 2 years old.  In any case, he was never associated with the RCM.
According to the 1980 New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, Lutyens studied composition with Darke (presumably Harold) and studied viola with somebody called Tomlinson.  Presumably the viola tutor was the Ernest Tomlinson referred to in the Wikipedia article on Jean Stewart (violist).  The latter page fortunately does not contain an irrelevant link to the composer, Ernest Tomlinson.
--Pontfren (talk) 16:29, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate link 

message: She was also known as ‘12 Note Lizzie’ - see the following Overlordnat1 (talk) 13:42, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  12 Note Lizzie
Talk:Cod philosophy

message: As a Matrix fan-boy, I'm almost offended by the Matrix statement and so I feel like disputes the ... thinggy. Neutrality. ^^;; Shamess 01:15, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll take it out... it's not really useful infromation anyways. -- Rmrfstar 12:54, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matrix statement
Talk:Sofala

message: I listed this article for expansion because it is important in terms of Portuguese, Mozambican and generally world history and there is significant information on it in the 1911 Encyclopedia, of which I added a link. I would add to the article, but I am short for time now.--Thomas.macmillan 01:16, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's not inaccurate.  The first people to access Sofala and make it a hub were traders from Mogadishu in the early 10th C.  The Swahili of Kilwa wrested control of Sofala from Mogadishu quite a bit later c. 1180s. Walrasiad (talk) 14:52, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: expansion 

message: Would be useful to know if there are an ruins or vestiges of the old town left today.WisDom-UK (talk) 17:45, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ruins? 

message: Sofala was under King Mutasa of Manyika Kingdom not Mwenemutapa. Mutapa made claims, he never ruled Sofala Mindthem (talk) 14:25, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sofala
Talk:Alyssa (album)

message: Alyssa is about the name and Alyssa (album) is about the album released by Alyssa Milano. 
Thanks User:Ryulong :) 
Persian Magi 01:47, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article is split to two now! 
Talk:Ball pit

message: Who invented the ball pit and when? dml 01:24, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The claim that "dangerous objects sometimes collect at the bottom of the pits" seems to be debunked by the urban legend websites.  I think the statement should be removed.  (The reporter in the Sesame Workshop article seemed to be one of the rumor spreaders.)  Jphillst 17:50, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: - diff. ---72.67.104.27 (talk) 02:38, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dangerous objects
Talk:Where or When

message: "Those who have not experienced déjà vu often misunderstand the words..."
people's having or not having experienced déjà vu is unrelated to their mis-hearing or misunderstanding the lyrics. i've experienced d.v. a thousand times and always thought it was "happened". better to say that the lyrics in question are sometimes mis-heard/misundertood as being/meaning, but...etc, etc. 63.142.146.194 (talk) 04:16, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  weird wording/idea
Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (flora)

message: This guideline doesn't say much about putting synonyms in bold.  So I guess MOS:BOLD takes precedence.  Accordingly, I did this.  Okay? Anythingyouwant (talk) 05:25, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: it's always a tricky issue. I would bold "major" synonyms, i.e. those widely used that have a redirect. Too much bold is distracting and unhelpful, in my view. Peter coxhead (talk) 07:41, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bolding synonyms 

message: The article at Persicaria affinis currently tells us that the accepted name for the species is Polygonum affine. Is this sufficient reason to move the article, if I judge that Persicaria affinis is much more commonly used? Ie, should the recommendation to use scientific names be interpreted as using the accepted name (backed by taxonomical sources), or the name which people are most likely to THINK is the "scientific name" (as indicated by the use in other sources, comparison of Google page counts etc).
*This flower (like so many others) is known by several vernacular names... and each of these vernacular names are “the most commonly used” in different areas of the world.  However, no matter which vernacular name is used in a given area, it is UNIVERSALLY known also by its scientific name.  Thus, the scientific name is actually the most commonly used. Blueboar (talk) 16:54, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: , the accepted name (as determined by consensus in recent taxonomic sources) should be used as the title. In some cases, there may not be consensus in recent sources. We don't need to wait for Google page counts for a recently accepted name to overwhelm results for a long-standing name now regarded as a synonym. However, neither do we want to rely on a single primary source; we don't immediately incorporate the nomenclatural results of every phylogenetic study that comes out; we wait for those changes to be supported by some secondary sources (this is basically the same logic that applies to changing title of articles on cities or other geographical features that have had a name change; new usage doesn't need to overwhelm old usage, but recent sources should demonstrate adoption of the new usage). Plantdrew (talk) 19:17, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is "scientific name" equivalent to "accepted name", or does [[WP:COMMON]] come into play?
Talk:Inner West

message: The section of the article addressing the 'best schools' in the area are dubious. There is no mention of criteria by which the schools are rated and there seems to be a bias towards older/'prestigious' schools, which are in no way associated with highest levels of academic success or statistics of later university entry or other measures by which schools can be rated fairly. I suggest removing the offending lines.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.72.5.135 (talk) 08:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some of New South Wales' best schools? 

message: The source of the "suburbs" listing is not only dubious but no longer around. A better option for real estate based would be… real estate. Example from Domain (Fairfax) - http://images-2.domain.com.au/file/2015/02/27/6304392/2015%2520Property%2520Guide.pdf :
* ABBOTSFORD
* ANNANDALE
* ASHFIELD
* BALMAIN EAST
* BALMAIN
* BEACONSFIELD
* BIRCHGROVE
* BREAKFAST POINT
* BURWOOD HEIGHTS
* BURWOOD
* CABARITA
* CAMPERDOWN
* CANADA BAY
* CHISWICK
* CLEMTON PARK
* CONCORD WEST
* CONCORD
* CROYDON PARK
* CROYDON
* DRUMMOYNE
* DULWICH HILL
* EARLWOOD
* ENFIELD
* ENMORE
* ERSKINEVILLE
* EVELEIGH
* FIVE DOCK
* FOREST LODGE
* GLEBE
* HABERFIELD
* HOMEBUSH WEST
* HOMEBUSH
* LEICHHARDT
* LEWISHAM
* LIBERTY GROVE
* LILYFIELD
* MARRICKVILLE
* MORTLAKE
* NEWTOWN
* NORTH STRATHFIELD
* PETERSHAM
* RHODES
* RODD POINT
* ROZELLE
* RUSSELL LEA
* ST PETERS
* STANMORE
* STRATHFIELD SOUTH
* STRATHFIELD
* SUMMER HILL
* SYDENHAM
* TEMPE
* WAREEMBA  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.211.207.221 (talk) 12:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of "Suburbs" listing 
Talk:Mark Webber (actor)

message: :Image:Emmanuelle chriqui mark webber promo still snow day.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
hes one real man, does more for people than he does for himself  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.48.82.211 (talk) 18:56, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Emmanuelle chriqui mark webber promo still snow day.jpg

message: In the section on "Personal life" it says, "Webber's life was subsequently the subject of a major news magazine story." If it was important enough to mention in the first place, then surely the name of the magazine should be noted as well. Cgingold (talk) 11:06, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: What magazine??
Talk:Arete of Cyrene

message: This is a bit of a puzzle. I tried to find the authority for the statement in an earlier version of this page  that Arete wrote 40 books, and taught philosophy in Attica, etc. I finally tracked it down to H. J. Mozans, (1913), Woman in Science, pages 197-9, who says that this statement comes from the famous 14th century writer Giovanni Boccaccio, apparently in his book On Famous Women. The puzzle is that I can find no independent verification of this. Modern encyclopedias and textbooks which repeat these lines all seem to refer to Mozans' book as the authority . I don't think that Mozans (the pen-name of John Augustine Zahm) was making this up, indeed he even gives us the Latin text he's translating, but modern versions of On Famous Women, and books about it  don't seem to make any reference to Arete at all. Singinglemon (talk) 17:20, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arete and Boccaccio 
Talk:South Western Sydney

message: This page has been tagged as unreferenced. Wikipedia's verifiability policy states "... any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source ...". In this case the material has not been challenged: is there any reason to suppose it is likely to be challenged? If not then there is no justification for the tag. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Unreferenced" tag
Talk:Abbotsbury, New South Wales

message: :Fixed. A pipe character (|) was missing from the infobox, confusing the infobox display. -- Longhair\talk 07:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sanford Middle School

message: goes here and i go to a leadership school called south seminole middle school and as you can plainly see it's redlinked so delete this school because it is not note worthy at all  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.33.245.11 (talk) 01:46, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: So, clarify: what do you want done, and why? Saeb(talkjorn) 03:17, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  My sister