lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:ValuJet Flight 592

message: I was baffled by the illustration which shows the aircraft in a level flight attitude before impact compared to the text which reads "Flight 592 disappeared from radar at 2:13:42 pm. It rolled onto its side and crashed to the ground nose-first in the Francis S. Taylor Wildlife Management Area in the Everglades, a few miles west of Miami, at a speed in excess of 507 miles per hour (816 km/h)."
Incidentally, the following sentence from the one quoted above is somewhat confusing "The crew continued to fly the plane until seven or fewer seconds before impact, likely until the front left floor beams collapsed and caused failure of the flight controls." Is this consistent with a nose-down attitude? I suspect the pilots were suffering from severe disorientation and request that this conclusion should be included in the paragraph. 176.24.226.120 (talk) 14:18, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I was looking at this article and noticed the issue with the illustration as well. If there aren't any objections, I'd suggest removing the image from the entry as what it shows is at odds with the entry text.  Natty10000 | Natter  16:23, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

text: Should have been removed long ago. Doing that now. Rsduhamel (talk) 14:59, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rolled On Its Side & Crashed Nose First Contradicts Accompanying Illustration 

message: The article mentions the altimeter "spiked" due to the sudden pressure increase presumably caused by one of the tyres in the cargo container bursting. Doesn't an increase in pressure mean a drop in height? So the altimeter would dip, not spike.
I realise the appaling pedantry I'm expressing here when a hundred people died. That's Internets! 
188.29.165.202 (talk) 22:07, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spike the altimeter 

message: I've just finished watching a Made-For-TV disaster film entitled "Crash: The Mystery of Flight 1501" (Or at least as it's written on the box of the DVD I have "Crash: The Mystery Flight of 1501".). The film was made in 1990 and aside from featuring the lead investigator into the ValuJet592 crash in the role of the doomed flights co-pilot the cause of the crash is very similar to ValuJet592, namely the transport of mislabled oxygen generating (& highly flamable) chemicals in a class D cargo hold.
The actual inspiration was probably Air Canada Flight 797 since details of that incident turn up in the fictional reconstruction of the accident sequence.
This might be worth adding to the article.Graham1973 (talk) 12:35, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Predicted in Fiction 

message: How was the plane's speed at impact determined when the flight data recorder stopped one minute before the crash?184.1.71.147 (talk) 15:22, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impact speed 

message: The list should include all or none, much less one person who wasn’t even on the flight. (I think the last is a slap in the face to families of victims who are excluded.) The two victims listed would be unrecognizable today by the vast majority of readers. Nicmart (talk) 19:26, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Victims
Talk:Quebec Nationalism

message: "Quebec Nationalism" or "Quebec nationalism"? I'm thinking the latter. "Quebecois nationalism" may be even better. -- stewacide
Lower case would be better, yes. "Quebecois nationalism" would not be appropriate because, if in French "Québécois" simply means an inhabitant of Québec, in the English language it seems it refers to the French language culture of Quebec, not the whole of Quebec. Since "Quebecan nationalism", "Quebecian nationalism", or "Quebecer nationalism" either don't exist or sound improper, "Quebec nationalism" is the only choice left. This is how it is referred to in English. -- Mathieugp
:My point was that the nationalism in question is restricted to the old-stock French speaking majority (the English usage of "Quebecois" as you correctly pointed out), and since that's what this article is about (right?) it would seem to be more acurate than just "Quebec".
:"Quebec nationalism" would have to include all the nationalisms in the province of Quebec (not only the Quebecois majority, but the English, various indian and Inuit groups, etc.), but I don't beleive that's the intent of this article. -- stewacide 23:28, 23 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Lists of extinct animals

message: "Dinosaurs, and a large number of historical orders are extinct... It is, however, generally accepted that birds are descended from a subgroup of dinosaurs - hence dinosaurs are not extinct."
----
Contradictory statements, I'm no expert but I'd say despite birds being descended from dinosaurs, they are Not dinosaurs. Therefore the latter are extinct. 194.168.3.18 14:23, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: From a cladistic point of view, birds are dinosaurs. However, this is completely irrelevant in this article that should only give some examples of extinct animals. Therefore I deleted the sentence. The facts are explained much better in the articles bird and dinosaur. -- Baldhur 15:54, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Birds and Dinosaurs

message: The section on Europe seems to have been deleted, will attempt to fix :p Grunners 02:44, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Europe

message: Wikipedia:Article assessment is looking at extinct mammals from the week starting 20 February 2006 - please come along and help out with the submissions and assessments.  violet/riga (t) 00:13, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sadly the findings haven't been very good - most articles only scored around 6 out of 10.  violet/riga (t) 00:08, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed sad, but the articles can still be improved! So everyone feel free to do so. All help is welcome. Pmaas 15:59, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They certainly can.  Hopefully the comments at WP:AA will help with this.  violet/riga (t) 16:30, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article assessment 

message: It has been suggested by Biatch that the "No longer considered extinct" section be merged with Lazarus taxon. I agree with this merger. And because this list is of extinct animals, not living or rediscovered animals, I think it can be merged now. Peter Maas 07:43, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal "No longer considered extinct" and Lazerus taxon 

message: It is hard to list every extinct animal, because so meany had been hunted or died of some other way. Most animals were killed by hunters, some legal and some not. Some were gone because of rainforst cut downs, and other habbats ruined.
why do people do things like that!!!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.106.186 (talk) 19:26, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lament

message: "This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it."
I wonder if I'm the only one who takes this as an admonition to go hunt some endangered animals. Agarvin (talk) 23:22, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Nice wording
Talk:November 22

message: ----
Removed:
*1906 - "S O S" is adopted as Morse code distress signal.
Could not be confirmed outside of 'this day in history'-type websites (very bad source). --mav 02:51, 22 Nov 2003 (UTC)

message: The firing of a soccer coach is not a globally notable event.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 16:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Steve McClaren

message: Becoming a prime minister is not a globally notable event because it is a regular occurrence.  If this person became prime minister under extraordinary circumstances, then it might be notable.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 16:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vladimer Gurgenidze

message: The Kennedy Assassination does not make the short list of anniversaries?  Not a big deal, but I find it curious. DavidRF (talk) 17:50, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I got a response. See WP:OTDRULES' #8. There's an issue with the External Links in the article. — WylieCoyote (talk) 13:30, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thankfully, this has been resolved at some point in the past four years. --Thnidu (talk) 16:14, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  No kennedy assassination? 

message: November 22nd is Kimchi Day in South Korea, Washington DC, Virginia, Maryland, and New York City. Cane Walker Wheelchair (talk) 09:07, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Is the spelling Kimcbi or Kimchi? Is there a wiki article about it? Is it celebrated on the same day each year? Do you have any references from reliable sources? Kiwipete (talk) 07:47, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kimcbi Day
Talk:Kabah (Maya site)

message: I decided to put the article at "Kabaah". While I realize that "Kabah" is a more common spelling, Kabah is a useful disambiguation page. -- Infrogmation 05:41, 22 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: The Corpus of Maya Heiroglyphic Inscriptions (IMO as good a standard reference as any to follow in the subject) has it as "Kabah", so I will move the article from "Kabaah" to "Kabah, Yucatán". -- Infrogmation 18:57, 26 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Talk:1600 in music

message: Whom does "we" refer to? RedWolf 06:23, Nov 22, 2003 (UTC)
If anyone monitors this...why are madrigals 
and ayres considered publications while oratorios are classical music?  That's diminuphobic!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sinnis (talk • contribs) 03:21, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Educating Rita

message: Some of these scenes are in the play retold by the actors and some of them are not there at all. Scene three in act two begins with Frank cursing "Sod them-no *censored* them! Fuck them, eh, Rita? Neither Rita or the audience have the first clue as to what he is referring to. As the dialogue progresses they audience is informed that he is upset because the students reported him since he had been very drunk while giving his last lecture. The audience never get to see the actual scene where this happens. They never witness Frank staggering and slurring in front of the class.
:It's been a while, but isn't the scene of people cycling in France actually UCD? Autarch 18:37, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose the above comment refers to the film rather than the stage play. <KF> 11:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Just a note

message: Is there any established relation between this Rita and the "lovely Rita, meter-maid" of The Beatles?--Awaler (talk) 18:31, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor Question 

message: What's with this business of calling "Rita" a girl; I thought feminism ended junk such as this quite some time ago!
She's over 21 and she's married; that makes her a WOMAN.
Sheesh; certain prejudices, even in such a potentially politically-correct charged world as "Wikipedia" sure can take a long time to die!
Satchmo Sings (talk) 03:15, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calling "Rita" a GIRL? 

message: This article is in :Category:Plays based on books, but nothing in the article indicates that the play was based on a book. Is there important information missing from the article, or is this category incorrect? --RL0919 (talk) 21:36, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Based on a book?
Talk:Demographics of the Philippines

message: This edit, which made cosmetic changes to unsupported information about age structure in the infobox, caught my eye. I noted that the Age structure section of the infobox, which the edit modifies, does not specify a validity year. I did a quick comparison of the figures given there with the figures given in the Population pyramid of the article, which also do not give a validity year, and found that these two sets of figures in the article did not agree with one another.
The table in the Population pyramid section cites this source in support. The cite for that says, "Retrieved December 4, 2015.". The source itself is titled "2018 United Nations Demographics Yearbook", but gives no figures for the Philippines on the linked web page. Some exploring beginning at the cited web page leads to this page, a search page defaulting to Afghanistan from which it is possible to search for information about the Philippines. Searching there is a bit confusing but, by searching for the Philippines and the year 2015, I was able to see figures labeled 2019 as a "Source Year"; those figures did not agree with either of the two aforementioned sets of figures in the article.
Would it be possible to get this cleaned up a bit? Perhaps the two sets of figures in the article could be brought into agreement and the source of those figures might be cited in support. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 09:53, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with age structure and population pyramid 

message: Why is the demographic data so poor?
Examples 1:
Section "Population pyramid" says cohorts 0–4, 5-9 and 10-14 are all over 10 millions, so need on average over 2 million births per year.
However, births "Year by year" never show over 1.8 million births per year.
Example 2:
In the "Year by year" table, the total population grows over the last year clearly more than the natural change. 
However, Philippines is an emigration country, so population increase should be below the natural change.
BenF
213.127.112.179 (talk) 11:17, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding example 1, it seems like the data is old and from the UN, not the Philippine government. It could use an update. --Glennznl (talk) 12:17, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the demographic data so poor?
Talk:Subobject classifier

message: This sentence "Since in any category subobjects are identified as monic arrows, we identify the value true with the arrow: true: {0} → {0, 1} which maps 0 to 1. " has to be modified, no logical link. Moreover where are now explicitly in the category of sets. Noix07 (talk) 14:21, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I got it now, it means that the object "true" (here {0}) is identified with the arrow from 0 to 1  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noix07 (talk • contribs) 15:05, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Introductory example 

message: What is the map 1 -> Ω used in the pullback diagram?
:It intuitively represents the "true" point in the subobject classifier [StefanLjungstrand 84.217.41.47 20:51, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ?

message: Anybody think there should be more examples (at the very least, the 'classical' subobject classifier in Set, and maybe one nonclassical example with no topology?)
BenetD 21:00, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, especially since many subobject classifiers have structure beyond the set {true,false}. As it sits, I think the article is a bit misleading, at least for people who can't follow the topology example. But unfortunately, my topos theory isn't quite good enough to improve this article yet. -emk (talk) 18:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More examples?

message: I don't think the definition of the subobject classifier of sheaves of sets on a space X is correct. Under the definition given, Ω would have only one global section, but the map of global sections from a sheaf A to the subobject classifier should provide information about where restrictions of the global sections of A belong to the subsheaf. For instance, for the one point set, Ω would be the one point set, not the two point set. I think the correct definition should be the sheaf that assigns an open set to it's set of open subsets, restricting by taking intersections.
For instance, to get the map which represents the subsheaf H^0(X) of constant functions inside C(X), we would take each function to the subset on which it is constant. Right? I'll change the page and add this example if no one objects. Holomorphic (talk) 07:27, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Example Wrong?

message: The references Mac Lane (1998) p.105 and Pedicchio & Tholen (2004) p.330 both define a subobject classifier not as just a special object Ω but as a monomorphism t:1 → Ω where 1 is a terminal object (here t is interpreted as the "truth" map), such that every mono is a pullback of t.  Deltahedron (talk) 20:55, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition
Talk:Outline of animal-powered transport

message: My first reaction to this article was a deep disappointment that I could not read how, exactly, buffalo have been used for transport.  Then I realized a more accurate title and context of this article would be if it were simply titled "List of animals used for transport".  This isn't an article about "animal powered transport".  Tempshill 05:19, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article should be "List of animals used for transport"... 

message: Can someone please explain this: "buffalo (as distinct from bison)."  American bison opens: "The American Bison (Bison bison), also called Buffalo, ...," which is a contradiction of this statement (or perhaps the statement in this article needs to be clarified). btm 04:23, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Buffalo

message: Can it be added to the article? Or ain't it really used for transport? 189.5.143.155 02:27, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Ostrich]] 

message: The page should be moved to animal-powered transport" (with the -).
This so it aligns to other articles (Human-powered transport, ...)
KVDP (talk) 09:16, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Support -- so I've put the move request and banner in place... EdJogg (talk) 23:14, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Page move has been completed. (Required admin assistance.) EdJogg (talk) 06:54, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree. Why is this still at nonhuman_animal-powered transport? I'll re-move it. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 18:58, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move to "Animal-powered transport"
Talk:Postage stamps of the French colonies

message: Although "French Colonies" is the traditional term, it could be confused with French colonies; "stamps issued for the French colonies without their own stamps" is unambiguous, but massively awkward. Suggestions welcome... Stan
=== How about adding "(stamps)"? ===
Or perhaps (philately)?
I'm trying to work on French colonialism in West Africa, and I keep coming across stamp work (which is evidence of what a good job people with that interest are doing).  We need to disentangle somehow, and I'm open to any suggestions.T L Miles 16:38, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The following comments appeared when this page was entitled "French Colonies"

message: Or perhaps (philately)?
I'm trying to work on French colonialism in West Africa, and I keep coming across stamp work (which is evidence of what a good job people with that interest are doing).  We need to disentangle somehow, and I'm open to any suggestions.T L Miles 16:38, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about adding "(stamps)"? 

message: It seems that the standard disambiguation is "Postage stamps and postal history of X".  See :Category:Postage stamps by country. T L Miles (talk) 23:46, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving this page.
Talk:Old Possum's Book of Practical Cats

message: Might as well list the other poems in this book since the list of cats accounts for a large number of them.   Pimlottc 05:17, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Can the material in this March 30, 2008 TimesOnline article be incorporated into the Wikipedia article?
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/poetry/article3646292.ece
WikiParker (talk) 12:53, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Scheffler illustrations

message: The link for "Bustopher Jones" always redirects back to this page. WHY??????  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.163.83.62 (talk) 23:12, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: the article Bustopher Jones was subject of an afd, the result being 'redirect', here is the discussion - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bustopher Jones. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:38, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: have just delinked bj from the article. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: What does AFD stand for?24.163.83.62 (talk) 23:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: afd is articles for deletion, here is a link to what it entails - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:45, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Great Eastern Islamic Raiders' Front

message: ==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment==
 This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.
==Untitled==
I have rated this article as a start type in Wikiproject Terrorism;  because the article does not cite enough resources nor does it cover the atrocities of IBDA-C sufficiently. It should also mention how they organize in prisons.  One or two photos would also help improve its quality.  I have made several edits to improve the article from - what I perceived - being a stub to being a start. Evren Güldoğan (talk) 20:48, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: I have rated this article as a start type in Wikiproject Terrorism;  because the article does not cite enough resources nor does it cover the atrocities of IBDA-C sufficiently. It should also mention how they organize in prisons.  One or two photos would also help improve its quality.  I have made several edits to improve the article from - what I perceived - being a stub to being a start. Evren Güldoğan (talk) 20:48, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Canon

message: Given that the article Aesthetic canon is really about artistic canons, I propose to move it to "Artistic canon" (the current title will remain as a redirect). 
Full disclosure: until a few days ago, the article had other material not directly related to visual or plastic arts, but it consisted of uncited musings that forked the articles on physical attractiveness, makeup, fashion but without any specific focus on canonical frames of reference. 
Please make any observations at talk:Aesthetic canon#Proposal to change name. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have initiated a wp:requested move process. As of today, the discussion is whether the name should be open ended ("Artistic canon") or well-defined ("Artistic canon of body proportion"), Please contribute at talk:Aesthetic canon#Requested move 26 September 2020. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 14:44, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Following discussion, I have revised the proposal to be "Artistic canons of body proportions". Please make any comments at the article talk page via link above. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 13:55, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aesthetic canon, artistic canon 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Non-canonical. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 26#Non-canonical until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  SWinxy (talk) 01:09, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Non-canonical" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Parkour

message: Would Soap shoes, shoes which can grind on rails, ledges be considered assistive equipment. 213.149.61.214 (talk) 10:30, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The lack of equipment is part of the definition of parkour. Something like that is a better fit with skateboarding. ··gracefool 💬 00:08, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: That is "equipment" designed for parkour; grinding on feet is a parkour element. Sure, strictly speaking it's equipment but it's just minimal assistance, something like talcum powder. Sure, skateboarders can use them, but they do the grinding with skateboards; when they grind on feet they are not skateboarders at that moment / they do not skateboard. 213.149.62.88 (talk) 18:23, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assistive equipment 

message: I am somewhat concerned that much of the subsection ==== Injuries and deaths ==== should be carefully recontextualized or trimmed, as major clinical claims are implicitly being made without any reliable medical sourcing. For example, "many parkour experts tend to view serious physical injury as a deviation from true parkour" may be understood by some as pristine theory trumping all. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to trace any obvious MEDRS. Which is regrettable. 86.172.165.132 (talk) 09:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Injuries and deaths 