lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Helmut Krackowizer

message: sorry, I do not understand the meaning of the insert. If it means that only very well known people should be mentioned there in the wikipedia I would like to draw your attention of the fact that in 1945 - 1955 many other persons would be worth to be mentioned but not known any more now. And in regard of Mr. Krackowizer he was specialist in vintage motorcycle not only in Austria but throughout Europe. Please tell me in simple words how I could increase the article 18:46, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Automaton Transfusion

message: 1) A cursory internet search only returns IMDB and other unaccaptable 2ndary sources
2) The IMDB reference and others do not meet notability guidelines per WP:NOTFLLM
3) There is no  full-length featured newspaper articles from large circulation newspapers or full-length magazine reviews and criticism reviewing the film.
4) The film appears not to be widely distributed in the US and it has not received full length reviews by two or more nationally known critics.  It is a straight to DVD release, limiting its veiwing population, as well not producing a box office return of any note. 
5) The film is not historically notable.
6) The film was is not considered notable by a broad survey of film critics, academics, or movie professionals. 
7) The film has not bee featured as part of a documentary, program, or retrospective on the history of cinema. 
8) The film has not received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.
9) The film has not been selected for preservation in a national archive.
10) As far as a internet search is concerned, the film is not "taught" as a subject at an accredited university or college with a notable film program. 
11) The film does not represent a unique accomplishment in cinema, a milestone in the development of film art, or contributes significantly to the development of United States cinema. 
I beleive this film should be given a prod tag. It does not meet notability requirements of WP:NOTFLLM and should be nominated for deletion. Barton Foley (talk) 18:06, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Calm your tits, ya twat. --76.24.231.227 (talk) 21:02, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Triethylamine

message: Why are there two schemes showing the molecular structure - one above, one below the table?! Seems pretty pointless to me... Iridos 17:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: could someone input the pKa of the conjugate acid, it is 10.6.
--130.95.202.20 (talk) 00:31, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: pKa

message: In the article, it is said that NEt3 bicarbonate salt is used as stationary phase in reverse-phase chromatography. Usually reverse phase chromatography means an apolar stationary phase, and this salt is clearly polar. 
Is hier wrong or the page of reverse-phase chromatography is wrong?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.96.151.103 (talk) 07:44, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. A good reference here would clear this up --Mglutamate (talk) 05:09, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversed phase chromatography

message: Answer plz 2400:9500:4005:E4E2:1:0:E722:E589 (talk) 02:31, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why T.E.A. use in MgO test by EDTA method.
Talk:Antonius Divitis

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This is a B-class article; it could use a works list, an image, and inline citations.  My full review is on the comments page; questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 00:56, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Aonio Paleario

message: Humanism may have different definitions.  IMHO:  Humanism is the secular religion and Zeigeist in competition with biblicist Christianity and the reformation-Zeitgeist coming out of the Renaissance; the humanism of the Renaissance was soon countered (thesis - antithesis) by the Reformation (Is there a synthesis?) In addition to the classic Reformation POV (which identifies Israel with the Church and may advocate theocracy in this age), there now exists the competing POV within Christianity called Dispensationalism (which distinguishes Israel from the Church and looks for Christ's return as the time of theocracy).  Certain segments of Christianity today do not look to the reformation as their founders or history, but to a "Trail of Blood" going back to NT times, of Christians who never came under the papacy and never sought to reform the Roman Catholic Church, being strangers and pilgrims in this life.  Paleario was obviously a Bible-believing Christian, but whether he agreed with Calvin's POV as to Church and Israel, and how to behave in this age, I do not know.  I think if he is to be called a reformer, that requires proof.  He may have been a Trail-of-Blooder.  Probably reformer should be eliminated from the article as well as humanist until there is solid reliable sources to substantiate such claims.  BTW, I think that one or more of Paleario's works are found online via the Archive site. (PeacePeace (talk) 21:04, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  I would not call Paleario a "humanist." nor a reformer 

message: It looks like an editor incorporated exact words from EB without quotes.  Regardless of whether the document quoted is public domain, quotations require proper quote marks or indentation to indicate quote. Also as needed insertions require square brackets and omissions elipsis dots.  (PeacePeace (talk) 21:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorporating exact language from the Encyclopedia Britannica requires quotes or indentation, not merely a footnote of acknowledgement
Talk:Goodwife

message: This article says that goodwife or goody was used as a "courtesy title of women of lower social standing" and that goodman was its "male counterpart"; but on the Goodman page, it says that goodman was a "courtesy title for gentlemen", implying a higher social standing.  Seems contradictory to me... --Jfruh (talk) 13:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the research I did, this was not a high ranking title, but still a better title than nothing. I touched upon this in edits I made recently. So, I wouldn't call this a title of lower social standing in the sense lower than the common people. Jevella (talk) 19:05, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Social standing?

message: Miss and Ms. are two entirely different terms of address, that's why I changed it...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.73.46.236 (talk) 09:20, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, but "Miz" isn't any kind of commonly-used spelling... AnonMoos (talk) 00:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miss and Ms. 

message: "The terms were used in England and Puritan New England."
Wouldn't the terms Goodman and Goodwife have been used wherever English people settled in North America in the 17th century?  Why just New England? What about, say, Virginia or Maryland? — Walloon (talk) 21:34, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: An excellent question, posed a year ago. WP is random, so sometimes such questions don't get answered. Sometimes there is a good reason. In this case, the question now applies only to Goodman, but the question does not currently appear there. David spector (talk) 17:57, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

text: The reason for this is that these values of "Goodwife" and "Goodman" were common in Puritan communities. As the Puritans were highly prominent in New England, the term was commonly used in this area. I remember it mentioned in one source that it was used lightly in other areas, but nowhere near as significantly as in New England. So while I'm responding nearly 12 years later...I do have an answer nonetheless. Jevella (talk) 19:02, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Geographical occurrence
Talk:Anuranan

message: I marked the article as being too much like a personal reflection because the intro and synopsis sound like an analysis of the themes or meanings of the movie rather than an account of the plot. The synopsis is also not written chronologically.
-AMSMeier  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AMMeier (talk • contribs) 04:10, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Sumner Henry Needham

message: From Detzer, David. Dissonance: The Turbulent Days Between Fort Sumter and Bull Run. New York: Harcourt, 2006. . p. 119: "The first to die was Private Luther C. Ladd, born in New Hampshire on his father's farm."...."Corporal Needham, a plasterer from Lawrence...was shot in the neck, then smashed by the crowd and kicked to a pulp. He lingered in Baltimore for eight days before dying of his wounds." The article on Luther C. Ladd with two citations, one contemporary from Harper's Weekly, support this. I have revised this article accordingly. Donner60 (talk) 09:37, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A reliable historian states that Luther C. Ladd was the first to die
Talk:Arnoldus Arlenius

message: What does this even mean?
Bitbut (talk) 05:20, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barbarously Ligatured 
Talk:Aaron the Tyrant

message: Regarding this revert, this biography is all about politics and nothing about religious beliefs. What is Aaron the Tyrant's contribution to ecumenism? Marcocapelle (talk) 06:18, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: * Again, that was just about politics. At some point in the Thirty Years' War France started supporting the Protestants, would you also classify that as ecumenism? Marcocapelle (talk) 06:30, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: *Recognizing the Primacy of Peter is a tad more than just politics. Also: did Richelieu obtain recognition of Catholic doctrines from said Protestants? Cause if he did, then yes, they would belong as well. See my point? Dahn (talk) 06:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

text: *This aside from the fact that Catholics and Orthodox are not divided along the same lines as Catholics and Protestants are -- which is why the Eastern Catholic churches are now a thing. See for instance Udriște Năsturel, who used Jesuit propaganda against the Protestants while remaining fully Orthodox. Dahn (talk) 06:37, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ecumenism categories
Talk:Arthur Champernowne

message: Moved here from Manor of Modbury. The material here may be useful to someone wishing to build a history of the family. If using this material without significant change in wording, please attribute Manor of Modbury in edit summary and on the talkpage if felt appropriate per WP:ATTREQ SilkTork (talk) 21:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Material on the Champernowne family
Talk:Subiaco Marist Cricket Club

message: A proposal to remove this page on the grounds of:
"Team in a lower league of the state competition"
was deleted.
As is stated in the article, the women's A grade team competes in the premier competition in the state of Western Australia.  This can be confirmed by visiting the Western Australian Cricket Association's website, which states: "The SunSmart Women’s Competition is the premier competition for women in Western Australia."  Subiaco Marist appears on the list of recent premiers (http://www.waca.com.au/cricket/women/grade.asp)-— Preceding unsigned comment added by Somerof69 (talk • contribs) 13:30, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Roch Marc Christian Kaboré

message: This article includes a dispute notice at the top, but there's nothing here on the talk page, and the article seems straightforward and uncontroversial, so I'm removing the notice. Everyking (talk) 20:04, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Quality Notices

message: It is unconfirmed at this time whether Kabore has indeed been deposed. This should be edited to reflect that the claims of his removal by military elements are only claims at this time -- he may still control the country. --Finnstitution (talk) 19:55, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Coup
Talk:Asakura Yoshikage

message: I have edited this article for grammar, spelling, and cohesion, but it still needs work in the citations department... Grammar Wizard (talk) 23:42, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Each Time I Kill

message: This should probably be merged with Wishman's article. I'm only finding brief mentions in passing to her overall life and death. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:51, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I disagree. The film deserves an article imv. The fact that it's Wishman's last film in itself makes a case for a standalone page. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 22:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Bunny Austin

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 04:25, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Shouldn't this be under 'Bunny Austin'? That's what he's normally called. Rothorpe (talk) 23:43, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what I came here to say too. Since nobody has objected, since what you say is demonstrably correct, and since most links point to Bunny, I'm going to go ahead and move it. --kingboyk (talk) 09:55, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - nice to get a prompt response aound here! Rothorpe (talk) 12:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move?
Talk:Henry Cockburn (footballer)

message: ===References===
http://www.cheshirebmd.org.uk
Birth: COCKBURN Henry 1921 Mossley Tameside Cheshire MOS/28/83
Parents Marriage: COCKBURN John Cooper DELANEY Elizabeth 1909 Hurst, St John Tameside Cheshire CE14/3/39
GRO Index http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/cgi/search.pl : Birth: Cockburn Henry. Mothers maiden name:Delaney
Ashton 8d 919 December Quarter 1921
Death: (Copy and Paste from findmypast)
Name: COCKBURN, Henry
Registration District: Tameside
County: Cheshire
Year of Registration: 2004
Month of Registration: January
Date of Birth: 14 September 1921
District No: 0141D
Reg No: D57A
Ent No: 156
Note: People born in the Hurst area of Ashton were registered in Mossley.
Velpremus (talk) 23:06, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth

message: http://www.cheshirebmd.org.uk
Birth: COCKBURN Henry 1921 Mossley Tameside Cheshire MOS/28/83
Parents Marriage: COCKBURN John Cooper DELANEY Elizabeth 1909 Hurst, St John Tameside Cheshire CE14/3/39
GRO Index http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/cgi/search.pl : Birth: Cockburn Henry. Mothers maiden name:Delaney
Ashton 8d 919 December Quarter 1921
Death: (Copy and Paste from findmypast)
Name: COCKBURN, Henry
Registration District: Tameside
County: Cheshire
Year of Registration: 2004
Month of Registration: January
Date of Birth: 14 September 1921
District No: 0141D
Reg No: D57A
Ent No: 156
Note: People born in the Hurst area of Ashton were registered in Mossley.
Velpremus (talk) 23:06, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Henry Eriksson

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 23:55, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:André Kempster

message: The article does not indicate Kempster's nationality, one of the crucial elements of any biography, I should think. LordAmeth 18:07, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identity 
Talk:Classmates (2006 film)

message: I am having trouble following a lot, especially in the plot. This makes it tough to edit but I still tried to do a little. I also removed the critical acclaim information that didn't involve a reference because that section's info should have citations. Coralshin (talk) 20:24, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page 
Talk:Archduchess Barbara of Austria

message: I read: "also had a very close relationship with her Protestant mother-in-law, Renée of France, daughter of Louis XII of France". But her mother-in-law Renée of France had left Ferrara in 1560, 5 years before Barbara came to Ferrara in 1565. If they had any relation it was only by mail, and not a very close one.  2.2.115.211 (talk) 17:37, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John C. England

message: The "Persistent myth" paragraph smacks of WP:OR. Kendall-K1 (talk) 01:53, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree completely. It looks as if it was added by someone with an axe to grind, who joined up for that reason only. I've removed it as unsourced and unencyclopaedic. The Navy named two ships after the guy for a reason. I noted what was in the article before the "persistent myth" change and found a source that supports that account. I've re-added, but  also re-worded for brevity and to avoid close paraphrasing. The source may not be the best RS, but as of now, it's the only source this bio has. - wolf 05:01, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Also agree. "In point of fact," it isn't a persistent myth. His efforts to save other crewmen is a matter of record, as is his receiving the Purple Heart as the only award for it. I added the reference for this. See the Naval History and Heritage Command on the sinking of six Japanese submarines.--KMJKWhite (talk) 17:36, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Persistent myth 

message: Text and references copied from USS England (DE-635) and USS England (DLG-22) to John C. England,  See former article's history for a list of contributors.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:05, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Text and references copied from USS Oklahoma (BB-37) to John C. England. See former article's history for a list of contributors.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 00:45, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attribution
Talk:Joseph Burlazzi

message: It looks like a B class article, but footnotes 11 and 13 (Barron p. 154-155) seem to be the same. I'm not sure what "pp. 154–155 of pp. 129–160" means. Please clear this up please. Thanks. Djmaschek (talk) 00:17, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks so much for taking the time to review the article for the Milhist WikiProject.  The phrase you're asking about ("pp. 154-155 of pp. 129-160") is one method of formatting footnotes that has been used by various publishers over the years; in this case, it just means that the specific reference to Burlazzi was contained on pp. 154-155 of the larger segment of content in which that Burlazzi reference fell (in "pp. 129-160"). Citing it this way lets readers know where to find the beginning of the battle description, as well as the page on which the specific Burlazzi reference is located. But since that formatting was problematic in your review, I've changed the formatting for both to just "pp. 154-155". Will that bring the article up to B-class for you? 47thPennVols (talk) 00:36, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations
Talk:Bartolomeo Eustachi

message: I think there's some confusion here.  His name in Latin is Bartolomeaus Eustachius (in the genitive, Bartolomaei Eustachi).  His name in Italian is Bartolom(m)eo Eustachio.  We shouldn't be mixing and matching these.  Let's choose one of these forms and use it as the primary name of the article.  --  JackofOz (talk) 04:21, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: His name
Talk:Henry Slesar

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates and tables for short stories, poems and/or book reviews. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 23:25, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 

message: I met Henry back in the day.  Late '70s, early '80s.  Quiet and reserved.  Didn't seem comfortable around all the maniacs in show biz.  Not that it was really show biz.  It was a soap opera.  Everyone was busy blowing smoke up everyone else's ass.  What a mess.  I felt sorry for Henry.  I am the same way.  I hate all that.  Anyway, nice guy, talented.  Wish I had stayed in touch.  Life goes on, and we miss what's important.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Longinus876 (talk • contribs) 06:40, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry?
Talk:Devadasu (2006 film)

message: The name of this movie in Telugu is also Devadas.  Devadasu is an old 1952 Telugu movie.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.195.210.42 (talk) 21:36, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bartolomeo Tromboncino

message: That portrait is of Petrarch. I doubt there was ever a portrait of this trombonist-frottolist. Mchernen (talk) 07:58, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are probably right, but I was not able to find a source (like a museum reference) for the actual picture. Let us know if you can find one. The picture has been used to represent Tromboncino apparently for rather a long time (it's even on a CD cover!) but I also think it is Petrarch. Removing it for now. Antandrus (talk) 18:42, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong picture?
Talk:Baccio Bandinelli

message: The article has 1488 in the text but 1493 in the birth cat; LC auth. file says 1493; they cite the Fitzwilliam catalogue as the source of their date. Should text be changed? --FeanorStar7 07:16, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Title of an exhibition catalogue: Ward, Roger. Baccio Bandinelli, 1493–1560: Drawings from British Collections. (Cambridge, Fitzwilliam Museum) 1988. --Wetman 10:52, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date

message: This is the caption to the picture of the Battle of Cascina. It should read "Copy of the Battle of Cascina by Michelangelo's pupil Aristotele da Sangallo", since the original no longer exists (as the article explains).METRANGOLO1 (talk) 09:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  cartoon of the Battle of Cascina by Michelangelo 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Uncontroversial common name. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:44, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Bartolommeo Bandinelli →  – This is the most commonly used name for this artist; see this ngram, the titles of books in the "Further reading" section, the Union List of Artist Names, the Grove Dictionary of Art, Britannica, etc. Ham II (talk) 06:47, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 June 2022