lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rasim Delić

message: Seems someone is trying to hide the fact the man was a war criminal. If someone is/was a war criminal, that must not be hidden in the end of the article - it must be said in the first paragraph. IF this wiki was a Turkish or Bosnian wiki, that fact probably wouldn't have to be mentioned at all, but since this is wiki in English, the very objective wiki in the world, users may only be banned for hiding this fact. This is related to you, PRODUCER. Please stop vandalizing the page and realize that being a war criminal at leasts bears the sacrifice of being mentioned as such. I don't understand how people can glorify people who decapitated other people, played football with their heads etc. I don't and I don't want to, I just want you people to chill. His deeds haven't changed if he passed out, God have mercy on his weak soul. --77.46.192.239 (talk) 15:10, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently inserting a "recent death" tag means your removing information relating to his war crimes. Please do not hide behind an ip (who I believe to be Дарко Максимовић) and check the history log. ◅ PRODUCER (TALK) 17:20, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't "hiding", for Christ's sake, I was just not logged in (as well as I am not right now). The strength is in the argument, not in a name. Anyway, it wasn't me who was removing war crimes related info, it was me who was putting it back. It is also of no importance if he died recently or not, the charge is still valid and will remain as such. --195.178.34.82 (talk) 13:35, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Westham

message: The article  is the Wikipedia notes on writing about settlements. One of its recommendations is that, in order to reduce the number of stubs, villages and other settlements within a civil parish should be in one article: I am proposing a merger of the Stone Cross article with this one as a result. I have also left blanks for some more local editor to complete.  I really saw no reason to have the note "see West Ham Football club" - there is more properly a town of that name - and Google does that all the time. 
Peter Shearan (talk) 06:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite
Talk:Willingdon and Jevington

message: In accordance with the Wikipedia article on writing about settlements , which recommends that parts of a civil parish such as this are all included in one article, thereby reducing the number of stubs, I have extracted the information from each of the several parts, although I have left them intact for the time being, merely proposing mergers. In any case, as can now be seen, there is much more to be said about Willingdon itself! The aforementioned Wiki article suggest the headings that should appear - History/Geography/Demographics/Education/ etc etc. This article then would not need to be a stub either, and the headings help to see what can be said about any particular place. Peter Shearan (talk) 19:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article rewrite
Talk:Wishing Tree, Hastings

message: yes, merge. Seems as though someone else tried to say this,but there is something wrong with the link to talk which proposes a merger. Sandpiper (talk) 23:18, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Then why is there a deletion tag as well as merge Blackwave...... (talk) 17:14, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge proposal
Talk:Miss Belgium

message: I'm not sure if the fact that a beauty queen doesn't speak three languages is noteworthy. Looking at other countries with more than one official language (Switzerland, Canada, Finland or even Ireland), I'm sure we could find quite many beauty queens who have not spoken one of the official languages. What is noteworthy is the reaction, and there I was also surprised by the wording in the paragraph. I've read about the event in De Standaard and yes, it seems to have been a controversy in Flanders that she doesn't speak Nederlands. In the rest of Europe, however, this piece of news has been reported as yet another incident of Flemish nationalism. At least in Scandinavia and England, the controversy has been the behaviour of the audience, not the miss herself. JdeJ (talk) 15:11, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. The reason that I included the paragraph is obviously the link to the hot topic of the 2007 Belgian government formation. The reference , which was added by someone else, is probably a better indication of this than anything I added. Looking at the title and subtitle of that reference (and the mere fact of a contest winner being booed by the audience), I do personally believe that the word controversy is justified. If you disagree however, feel free to make amendments. I did not mean to choose the side of the audience or the Miss, I just tried to display the facts and explain the situation. Belection06 (talk) 18:19, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy
Talk:Kent Fortress Royal Engineers

message: This article states that the unit was formed in 1932. This is not correct. The Royal Engineers (Kent Fortress) existed as a territorial unit prior to the First World War in 1914. My grandfather was a member of the unit prior to signing up with the regular army in September 1914.
Mylesfrancis (talk) 11:36, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This site  supports the above. It may be that the unit was disbanded and then re-formed. I'll add a note to the article and follow it up when I can. The original info is sourced as stated. Folks at 137 (talk) 22:09, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kent Fortress formation date 
Talk:20th Century Coyote

message: The pilot episode of Saturday Live which aired 12/01/1985 a year before the main show, featured 20th Century Coyote (see the end credits here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceHua73EV2M) I haven't seen the actual show. But I believe this was Rik and Ade, and I believe at least part of this would have been the Dangerous Brothers "World of Danger" sketch previously released on VHS and DVD. But the credits only show the name 20th Century Coyote. Stocko123 (talk) 15:44, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Margery Corbett Ashby

message: User:GorillaWarfare removed election tables from this article explaining; (rm long set of tables of election results per WP:IINFO). I assume reference is being made to section 3. Excessive listings of statistics. However the data used in the article is not a list but a collection of tables and the section states "consider using tables to enhance the readability of lengthy data lists." Therefore the use of tables was entirely in accordance with WP:IINFO. I should add that the tables used were standard templates of the UK Politics project. I have therefore restored them to the article. Graemp (talk) 05:27, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of tables
Talk:Yavarum Nalam

message: Why no mention of the O Sexy Mama - Censor board controversy?--Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: I am not able to find any official press release from Weinstein to this effect. Delete?   REINCARNUT   (I'm over here) - You gotta do what you gotta do.  —Preceding undated comment added 16:34, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remake 

message: From the starting paragraph: "Released on 6 March 2009, the film received highly positive reviews. Rediff called the film as one of the best films of 2009.[3]"
Later: "The film received mixed reviews from critics." ... "Rediff.com rated the film 2 out of 5 stars and said, "One simply wishes it didn't have to be such hard work getting to the point, for the filmmakers as well as the audience."[9]"
Uh?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.0.18.182 (talk) 13:53, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception
Talk:Charles Francis Meade

message: What is the source for the (now deleted) suggestion that Meade was the first person to make a winter ascent of the Matterhorn. Sources which I have seen suggest that it was an Italian, many years before. See eg: 
45ossington (talk) 08:03, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: First winter ascent of the Matterhorn?

message: Meade
Matterhorn
Zermatt
'''
Meadows  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:411:1600:226:8FF:FEDC:FD74 (talk) 14:33, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The lastname Meade has the same etymological roots about meadows has both Matterhorn and Zermatt. Wow! 
Talk:Christopher Reynolds (politician)

message: The following was placed on the article page:
Was he born in Gravesend?  A published Reynolds genealogy made the assumption from this ship’s list that this Christopher Reynolds was probably born in Gravesend, Kent.  But this is based on inadequate research.  For one thing, the Port of London was actually located at the mouth of the Thames, at the town of Gravesend.  So ships leaving the Port of London actually left from Gravesend.  It makes sense that the local minister would administer the oath for ships leaving London, regardless of where the passengers were from.  In fact, according to Hotten’s lists, the same minister performed this duty for every one of the 20 ships leaving London in the year 1635.  (Not to mention other years.) It seems ridiculous to conclude that every person leaving England was therefore a resident of Gravesend.  His connection with Gravesend was merely that his trip originated in London.  Also note that there was no reason for a person who was already a Virginia resident to take this oath a second time.Baird, Robert W. "Reynolds Citations 1622-1699" Copyright 2001-2007
I can't find anything to disagree with. Pdfpdf (talk) 14:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doubt & uncertainty 
Talk:SS City of Cairo

message: The SS City of Cairo  has been recently rediscovered, the page is due for an update.
Potential sources:
http://www.deepoceansearch.com/City_Of_Cairo.htm
http://www.sscityofcairo.co.uk/
http://expeditionwriter.com/?p=884 
Expeditionwriter (talk) 17:02, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  SS City of Cairo Rediscovered 

message: Only the very largest ships were fitted with quadruple expansion engines. This ship seems to be too small for such engines, so in the interests of accuracy should this read TRIPLE Expansion. These latter were the standard MN engines until the coming of the Diesel engine.AT Kunene 123 (talk) 12:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engines
Talk:Danylo Skoropadskyi

message: A rumor exists that Skoropadskyj had a child with a woman named Olesya Tukhai-Bei. However, this has never been proven in a court or law or demonstrated in in academic studies. There appears to be a bevy of evidence that Tukhai-Bei fabricated her relationship with the Hetmanych for political gains in modern Ukrainian politics. I have therefore reflected that he is alleged to have had a child with Tukhai-Bei, rather than asserting this as fact. 215lax (talk) 21:10, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Illegitimate Child of Skoropadskyj
Template talk:Top ten tennis players

message: It would work if you open and view the template, but it would not work if it is transcluded to the player article as it would be displayed like "Found atpsingles, Novak Djokovic". Can anyone fix this? Unnamelessness (talk) 05:30, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to fix but the only way I did it is to go to the players page in External Links and remove the atpsingles=y and just leave  It took out the yellow highlight for the section though. Sashona (talk) 02:10, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

text: You should report this in the wikipedia:Teahouse, someone should be able to help you there. Sashona (talk) 21:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues with transclusion
Talk:Deltathree

message: Storing this here for future reference: Tshuva succeeding: Deltathree about to sign contract with Microsoft.—Biosketch (talk) 11:57, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Storage 
Talk:Garden City Hotel

message: How could the first and second hotels have burned down on the same day? Year and all? This is inaccurate, an obvious oversight. Perhaps someone can provide some clarity to this article by researching the correct dates of the fires.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.122.146.191 (talk) 20:12, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember reading an article from the mid-1970's in Sunday Newsday's LI Magazine showing the cupola of the hotel knocked over with a wrecking ball. I never even heard of the place until I saw the article, and it made it seem like it was being demolished permanently. I wish I could remember the exact date. ----DanTD (talk) 00:01, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I could not find any mention of a fire at the first hotel in researching this subject.  A new reference has been added, which indicates that the original hotel was redesigned and expanded Transpoman (talk) 16:57, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date Clarification  

message: I just tried Google Maps to figure out which sections of Garden City are in the Town of Hempstead, and which parts are in North Hempstead, and of all things for me to find, GoogleMaps has misidentified the Garden City Hotel as Roosevelt Field Mall. The problem is, I have no way of contacting them to tell them they're wrong. Any advice? ----DanTD (talk) 00:40, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google Maps mislables the hotel 
Talk:Nova TV (Croatia)

message: The article resembles an ad - similar to its former Croatian counterpart. The complete list of all shows that were broadcast by the company is irrelevant and was removed. Rosier (talk) 16:02, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It has crawled back in, with a "Coming soon" section - even worse. GregorB (talk) 09:46, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ad

message: * 00:32, 14 July 2010  m (7,641 bytes) (moved Nova TV to Nova (Croatian TV): There is Bulgarian, Croatian and Czech TV channels with the same name.)
* 09:36, 15 July 2010  m (7,457 bytes) (moved Nova (Croatian TV) to Nova TV (Croatia): Actually called "Nova TV")
Note that Talk:Nova TV still points here.
With a move so badly done, I'm wondering if it's better to actually wholly revert it. Just now I reverted a merge of Nova TV into Nova. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 08:51, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: move from [[Nova TV]]
Talk:George Howe (architect)

message: how to dis ambiguate? is it automagical? Mirror dash shade (talk) 16:23, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: um...
Talk:Keith Mills

message: Received an honorary doctorate today at Anglia Ruskin university. --James Pain (talk) 16:19, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honorary 
Talk:Fellowship of the Royal College of Anaesthetists

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved.  There is consensus to merge as well. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 09:59, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Final FRCA →  – I would like to propose that Primary FRCA and Final FRCA be merged and renamed to Fellowship of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. These two examinations are both part of the syllabus for the FRCA, with the primary only functioning as a stand-alone qualification if the trainee in question ceases anaesthesia training after obtaining it, at which point they are awarded Membership rather than Fellowship. In addition, both source articles are quite short and I believe would make much more sense as sections within a merged article. An alternative would be Examinations of the Royal College of Anaesthetists or similar and to then include the examinations for Fellow of the Faculty of ICM or Fellow of the Faculty of Pain Medicine. Alice Jamie (talk) 07:39, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge & rename discussion
Talk:Elizabeth Cady Stanton/Archive 1

message: The modern political debate over abortion has forgotten or ignored the position of early feminists on the issue, but writings clearly display the very negative opinion Stanton and others held of abortion.  In an 1873 letter to Julia Ward Howe, recorded in Howe's diary at Harvard University Library, Stanton stated of abortion:
:"When we consider that women are treated as property, it is degrading to women that we should treat our children as property to be disposed of as we see fit."
In The Revolution of February 5, 1868 Stanton called abortion "infanticide."  In the March 12, 1868 issue she proposed the solution to abortion would be found, at least in part, in the elevation and enfranchisement of women.
:Well - the editor who placed the information here may have had a POV.  But this information clearly defines Stanton's point of view as well, and so may be appropriate.  Abortion was a significant issue at the time, as was birth control and a women's right to retain her children following a divorce.  All women's rights figures declared opinions on these issues.  So, I put a little back in, but did not make it the focus of an entire section.  Comments welcome. WBardwin 06:16, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: --removed the same material from the article.  As the two versions are nearly identicle, it may be quote/copyvio or copied from this page.  Please, editor, explain your intent on this matter.  Discussion pages are designed for justification, compromise and concensus.  Your POV is clear, but the material does not accurately reflect the feminist stance on the issue at the time.  Certainly accurate parallels cannot be drawn between the views of 18th century feminists and modern abortion critics.  Comments are welcome here.   WBardwin 09:19, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stanton on Abortion 

message: How can Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony have organized the 1848 Seneca Falls Convention together if they didn't meet until 1851?
:Thank you for your question -- someone had placed Anthony's name (inappropriately) in the early paragraph in place of Lucretia Mott.  I think I have corrected the error.  WBardwin 01:53, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meeting of Stanton and Anthony 

message: I read somewhere that Stanton was acquainted with John Brown and that he and Frederick Douglass had atteneded the Seneca Falls Conference or was that just Douglass or maybe a different conclave?  Tom Cod 23:16, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know about Stanton's acquaintance with John Brown, but she certainly knew Frederick Douglass. They were friends until their disagreement over whether or not the 14th and 15th amendments should be ratified. (I've added a discussion of this to the article.) She very well may have known John Brown since her cousin, Gerrit Smith, was a member of the Secret Six that financially supported his raid (also added to article), but I don't know that they met. User: --Jancarhart 13:19, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to Frederick Douglass & John Brown
Talk:Celtic cross stitch

message: I don't believe the "sources" cited support the claims made in this article; the artwork may be Celtic, but there's nothing there to support a claim for any particular techniques as being ancient or Celtic. --Orange Mike  | Talk 16:25, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsupported claims

message: I've cleaned this up and removed the unsourced date of 1735 from that sampler; nothing about it suggests that it's anything but contemporary and the uploader doesn't give a date.  
The uploader of that image also created this article; his/her only other contributions have been to link to this article and add external links to http://www.mycelticcrossstitch.com here and there.
Sorry no one on the Textile Arts project noticed this article before. 
I would be open to folding this into cross-stitch entirely if other editors active in Celtic articles this that is appropriate. - PKM (talk) 19:03, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaned up
Talk:John Laing (businessman)

message: If a successful businessman dies poor, it does not prove he was generous : He could have made bad decisions or he could have had one of many vices. People are inclined to keep both of these things under wraps.  -- user:nroets  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.242.165.194 (talk) 21:37, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logic that "proves" his generocity
Talk:Michael Anthony Rodriguez

message: It doesn't make sense to reference the fact that Rodriguez pulled the police officer from the car if you don't detail the fact that the officer was shot in the head and back after he was pulled from the vehicle. Otherwise, you're providing an incomplete picture of events, and disconnecting Rodriguez' activity from the proximal cause of death. The details are relevant, and without them, the account is incomplete and oddly sterile.
Mfrench518 (talk) 16:28, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oshman's Killing
Talk:List of cumulative spacewalk records

message: Shouldn't this also include a list by most spacewalks, instead of just a list by cumulative time? The title of the article doesn't show a preference towards cumulative time versus cumulative EVAs, or cumulative missions with an EVA experience. If not, then "time" should be added to the title of the article, since this article doesn't cover cumulative records, only cumulative time records. -- 76.65.131.217 (talk) 09:14, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  records 

message: Rick Mastracchio just finished his 8th spacewalk today on the ISS. His cumulative time record is now 51:28. It's quite possible a lot of the other data is old as well. Source[the final paragraph]: http://www.nasa.gov/content/astronauts-work-to-install-ammonia-pump-module-on-second-spacewalk/index.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnimationB (talk • contribs) 21:57, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Information seems dated 

message: In the second paragraph of "NASA Experience" for Ross' bio of this website it states that his total EVA time is 58:18, not 58:32 listed in the article. The link to the source: http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/Bios/htmlbios/ross.html  
For Smith his time says 49:48 in the article but NASA's bio says 49:25. Source: http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/Bios/htmlbios/smith-s.html— Preceding unsigned comment added by AnimationB (talk • contribs) 22:27, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jerry L Ross and Steven L. Smith's Time 

message: hi,
This list states that Padalka has performed 10 EVAs with cumulative time of more than 38 hours. I asked spacefacts.de why they list only 8 EVAs with less time. I got the following response: "Padalka has only eight EVA’s plus two Intra Vehicular Activities (IVA) – on September 15, 1998 and June 10, 2009. Only the Russians count IVA’s as EVA’s."
what do you think? I found no official record (yet) on total EVA time for Padalka
Golan's mom (talk) 15:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the only place I could find IVA defined. I think the article needs a footnote defining the acronym. It's not mentioned at IVA or Extravehicular activity, either. Pburka (talk) 04:22, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Padalka
Talk:Milos Stankovic

message: Having read the judgment, I do not think this section does justice to the judgment.  It does not "clear his name", since he has never been convicted, his name was always clear.  what it does do is confirm he disobeyed a lawful order, and that the police were right to have reasonable suspicion.  this isn't mentioned at all.
I suspect someone has drafted this who has a favourable leaning towards the subject, so I won't edit it until a contrary case is made below
Kingsbench (talk) 09:05, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Litigation (February 2018)
Talk:Nicola Minichiello

message: I missed more information about Winter Games 2010, when I found this Telegraph article:
Winter Olympics 2010 Nicola Minichiello has victory in sight despite rare eye complaint
--Mideal (talk) 12:28, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled