lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:North Carolina Highway 111

message: Isn't NC 111 a branch of NC 11 since the first two digits are the same? --NE2 16:12, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Originally yes, but over time the state gave up on the branch system as things got dislocated after updating to US Routes, adjusting with South Carolina and Virginia, and updating to Interstates.  Answering your question, yes, the first two digits would indicate it as such.  --WashuOtaku (talk) 16:36, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the NCRoads annex, I see that 111-119 were all created in or soon after 1930, and all were near NC 10, while only 111 was near 11. Most likely they ran out of 10x numbers and went to 11x. In any case, I'm removing that sentence from the article. --NE2 17:40, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Florida State Road 97

message: I have assessed this article as Stub-class and identified the following areas for improvement:
* The article is not comprehensive and needs expansion
* The article needs references
master sonT - C 14:53, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled comments
Talk:Harry Dresden (TV character)

message: How about we move some things into a 'Discontinuity' section, differences between the TV show and books into it's own section and eliminate the hockey stick/drumstick bit entirely, or at the very least, merge it into the main body. It doesn't seem to be particularly helpful or useful.
Kylar 00:00, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It definitely needs new sections giving real world context. --Stfg (talk) 14:46, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: I dislike having a trivia section entirely
Talk:Laguna del Carbón

message: How can Laguna del Carbón be the seventh lowest point and also the tenth lowest point?
List of places on land with elevations below sea level
One of the articles is wrong.--Celtic hackr (talk) 17:39, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seventh Lowest point? 

message: Do people live nearby? What's the climate like? Flora and fauna? Does the level fluctuate? Is it polluted? Beorhtwulf (talk) 22:24, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: What's in the area?
Talk:Cooks' Cottage

message: Why is it Cooks' Cottage instead of Cook's Cottage? Ivar the Boneful (talk) 10:27, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Belated answer - The house was originally promoted in Melbourne as Captain Cook's Cottage. That was what it was known as in my youth, over 60 years ago. Then it became clear that Captain Cook probably never lived there. The house was built for his parents, after he had moved out. So it became the house belonging to the Cooks, or Cooks' Cottage. HiLo48 (talk) 23:15, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: More in:   Errantius (talk) 21:21, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Fort Omaha Guardhouse

message: Article reassessed and graded as stub.  Also, this article should be merged into the Fort Omaha article. --dashiellx (talk) 11:19, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The topic of this article is individually notable and does not need to be merged. • Freechild'sup? 02:19, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: The photo in this article is of a commemorative plaque near the gate, and not of the gate itself. Please leave the photoreq in place. • Freechildtalk 01:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE: reqphoto
Talk:Dalbergia nigra

message: Is this where Brazilian Rosewood Oil comes from? 89.240.28.80 (talk) 15:31, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: good question, i dont think this species could be the one where the oil comes from. there is an essential oil, an oil for sealing exterior wood construction, such as decks. I have such a deck, made of "brazilian redwood", and the rosewood oil i will use to seal it cant be from this tree, as harvesting is illegal. so i am not sure what the source is of this product.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 16:40, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an unrelated plant, Aniba. Still somewhat protected. --jpgordon::==( o ) 02:57, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oil
Talk:City Market (Charleston, South Carolina)

message: Is this the right place? Do you already have this image somewhere? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:05, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That looks like it, in the center.  Bms4880 (talk) 17:16, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That's good news. Here's a cropped verrsion that may be suitable for the article. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:51, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Added.  Great find!  Bms4880 (talk) 13:18, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, great work, including with the cropping.  Definitely helps the article a lot, to see the full extent of the complex, rather than just seeing the front end and some other segment ends. --doncram 14:02, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aerial View 

message: I've added a cite to the blurb about the proposed redevelopment that happened in 1901.  The problem is that the hyperlink LOOKS like it links to the wrong page.  When Google scanned all of the old newspapers, they scanned the LAST page of most editions along with the FIRST page of the next day's edition.  So, the hyperlink is correct to February 3's newspaper, since page 10 (the last page) of Feb. 2 is actually the first day of that edition. (I hope that makes sense!) Any way, I'm afraid people will not realize what is going on. I have looked around and can't figure out a way to insert a NOTE in the citation to explain this so readers don't get confused.  Can anyone take a look at that and help out?
:It says "February 2" when the link is opened, so I don't think it'll cause confusion, even though the link is technicially to February 3.  As long as the cite mentions the date and page, we're ok.  Bms4880 (talk) 14:18, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing cites 
Talk:Judgment notwithstanding verdict

message: I added the cleanup tag (in addition to the unreferenced tag already in place)because parts of the article (namely the last paragraph) seemed repetitive. Plhofmei (talk) 23:03, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean Up 

message: I added an accuracy dispute with regard to the statement about the appeal by the prosecution after a judgment of acquittal. I believe this is misleading, while it may be true in some cases, I believe the article should make a reference to exclude the United States from this statement. The prosecution may not appeal a judgment of acquittal under any circumstances, even if the jury did originally enter a guilty verdict. Once the court has found that the defendant is not guilty, jeopardy has terminated and to appeal a judgment of acquittal would be another court reviewing the same case for which a not guilty verdict has been rendered, this cannot happen as it would be constitute double jeopardy. A judge granting a motion for judgment of acquittal is stating that, after review of all the evidence, the prosecution has failed to prove the charge to the extent that reviewing each fact in the light most favorable to the prosecution and making all logical inferences in favor of the verdict, still can not convince a reasonable person that the defendant is guilty. This is not the same as a dismissal, where a judge dismisses a case without prejudice, the state could bring the charges back because no finding of not guilty was rendered, cases can be dismissed for a multitude of reasons, many having nothing to do with guilt or innocence. A defective indictment could be dismissed but that would not prevent the prosecution from procuring a new charging instrument. I would like a jurist to weigh in, and if I am correct it should be noted since many times the United States is assumed to be the primary setting. --ChiefinspectorClousea (talk) 12:09, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that you are inaccurate.  The defendant is not being tried a second time.  If the appeal is upheld, the defendant's guilty verdict is simply applied properly. Cosumel (talk) 03:54, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed 

message: The article presents the topic from an American POV only. Is it really not used in any other countries? Grrahnbahr (talk) 01:08, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Local POV 

message: The right-hand bar and category info indicate that the article is about civil proceedings, but the second half of the article is about criminal proceedings. 23:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the template and the category because they were misleading. -kyykaarme (talk) 23:17, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Civil or criminal
Talk:Doddington, Cheshire

message: I am unable to access population statistics, and have therefore included just the historical figures from Genuki. Espresso Addict 00:22, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing 2001 census figures
Talk:MDVIP

message: The MDVIP fee is not inclusive of insurance premiums, co-pays, co-insurance or other fees so it's really a misnomer. Other concierge plans which may have a higher sticker price are often cheaper when all costs are considered.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.151.45.126 (talk) 15:15, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Older comments
Talk:Centre for Contemporary Photography

message: This article presents institution-generated information but no verifying citations or references. The dates of tenure for the series of directors might be listed, and a list of exhibitions with links to, or citations of, critiques and in-depth analyses would give it encyclopaedic status. Happy to assist. sinarau (talk) 08:21, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Jamesmcardle(talk) 08:37, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page needs attention
Talk:AM404

message: just curious what other people think, but couldn't am404 also prevent inflammation by preventing the synthesis of prostaglandins, since they are derived from arachadonic acid?  (Ccroberts( t · c · g ) 21:07, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: From my understanding of the subject, there exists no definite conclusions reguarding paracetamol's mechanism of action. It is believed that AM404 is responsible for much (or all) of the analgesic action. Curiously, however, it has relatively weak anti-inflammatory action in comparison to that of aspirin and other NSAIDS.--Metalhead94 (talk) 00:54, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  am404 antiinflamatory action 

message: It makes no sense. TRPV1 activation causes pain or heat sensation. Capsaicine is known to activate the receptor, and that's what makes chili pungent. If one of the reasons for AM404 being an analgetic was TRPV1 activation, it would have to be the opposite to that of capsaicine. The only wat in which TRPV1 agonism would decrease pain is that a prolonged exposure to high doses of the agonist decreases the sensitivity, which is the case in any type of receptor activation, but this would mean that AM404 is no more an analgetic than capsaicine or any other source of pain... and the relief would come after a period of pain actually getting worse.
Can anyone explain all this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.105.131.43 (talk) 12:44, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  TRPV1 agonist? 

message: Is AM404 a agonist of the cb1 receptor the cb2 receptor or both? Ki values should also be shown I feel 67.80.103.155 (talk) 06:49, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: AM404 inhibits the uptake and degradation of arachidonyl ethanolamide,i.e., anandamide, an endogenous ligand ("endocannabinoid") at cannabinoid CB1 receptors. Blocking degradation enhances and prolongs anandamide concentrations, i.e., actions, where it is released. The pain relieving effects of acetaminophen are at least partly reduced by CB1 antagonists.Inhibition of COX-2 also enhances endocannabinoid actions. I believe the AM stands for the initials of the cannabinoid chemist Alexandros Makriyannis. BradleyAlger (talk) 01:52, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article does not show data about activity
Talk:Fairview, Erie County, Pennsylvania

message: Feel this one sentence article would be better if merged into Faiview Township. It seems like something that should be mentioned in the township history section. --​​​​D​​tbohrer​​​​talk•contribs 00:53, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If "who" waited two years? I assume the people of Fairview. Still Fairview is only a township and would be better if this article was redirected to the township and the fact that Fairview was a distinct community until recently and should mentioned in the township article. You are welcome to convince me otherwise by finding the community website (not the township's) and also who is in charge of the actual "community" of Fairview. Also addresses and phone numbers are technically not allowed (see WP:NOT#DIR). --​​​​D​​tbohrer​​​​talk•contribs 20:43, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are completely missing the point- if the people of the Borough of Fairview waited two years to dissolve the municipality they wouldhave been covered by the Census 2000, which the RamBot found and uploaded to Wikipedia a while ago. Point two: Fairview is still a distinct community, it is just not a distinct municipality (there is a difference). Point three: Fairview is goverend by Fairview Township, and the township website has the information on the former borough. See also: Washington Boro, Pennsylvania, another former borough that got dissolved into another township. Kitia'' 20:05, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright. Also try to not duplicate any info from the township, to the borough page. Unless its historical and/or pretains to the borough before being dissolved. --​​​​D​​tbohrer​​​​talk•contribs 20:28, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Fairview Township
Talk:Maria Anna of Austria

message: Most of the portrait paintings said to be of Maria Anna of Austria, such as the one used in the header as well as its many variations in the commons, are obviously depicting her daughter Barbara of Portugal. Poldl (talk) 17:30, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mislabeled portrait paintings
Talk:Pompadour (hairstyle)

message: The section on the men's hairstyle says it wasn't called this until the 1950s. In the "Great Gatsby" Jay Gatsby is mentioned as having had a pompadour as seen in a photo. The novel was published in 1925 so either the hairstyle was called that for men as far back as that or it was a different style of the same name. I cannot find anything online to suggest it was not referring to a hairstyle.
Molybdomancer (talk) 14:08, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible error in date given for men's style?

message: How about some more pictures? some from the 50's would be ace.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.176.139 (talk) 23:54, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ditto that.  alyssch (talk) 22:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lacking pictures

message: Is this the haircut that Link in the 2007 movie Hairspray wore? AIM95 00:57, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Link in Hairspray

message: The page describes the pompadour as formed by combing, "sculpted" – but not a particulary haircut. I'm moving the page name accordingly. -- Deborahjay (talk) 19:12, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hairstyle, not haircut 

message: An over exhaustive list of who wore a pompadour (or a variation of it) is not the correct way to formulate an encyclopedia article.  Christ, you people are stupid.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.95.216.225 (talk) 18:53, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not my area of expertise, so I won't to try to rewrite this very flawed article.  But I have added a proper lede, with a basic definition of the style, and more pictures to illustrate the look in different periods.  I also put the women's section first, to accord with history and popularity.  Textorus (talk) 06:30, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crappy article 

message: * Pompadour (hairstyle) → 
* Pompadour → 
– This is the only article of three on the disambiguation page that is actually called "pompadour", thus making it the primary topic for that term. Relisted. BDD (talk) 18:54, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: The last sentence of the introduction, "The name was coined in the
20th century" is apparently incorrect. The name was being used for
the style for men's hair by late 1886. Up until that time it was
in use to refer to a style of women's dress trimming. I 
discovered this while doing related research.
Rolla (Mo.) Herald, Dec 30 1886, reprinting from Chicago Journal:
"The fashion of clipping the hair short except on top of the head,
called the pompadour, is only about ten years old..."
Cpacker666 (talk) 03:49, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name used for men's cut in 1880s 

message: The redirect Pompadour (hairstyle has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 20:45, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Pompadour (hairstyle]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Blair Tindall

message: This entry has (in other forms) been zapped at least a couple of times. I think it needs to stay (be improved and expanded of course -- right now it reads like a press release). Between music career, book, etc., Tindall is at least as article-worthy as many other musicians on Wikipedia. KConWiki 01:07, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Even though the editor who deleted it may have a COI problem, the "source" given was an online gossip zine called TMZ.com; not exactly a reliable source by our standards. --Orange Mike  | Talk 00:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill Nye restraining order 

message: Here is documentation of the wedding, found on Youtube.com: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9n3fLpJz1_g   EnglishHornDude (talk) 20:13, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriage to Bill Nye 

message: I found the page for Blaire Tindall. It contains the following sentence:
"In 2012 Nye sued Tindall for unpaid attorney's fees, after she had not paid any of the $57,000 she was ordered to pay back.[citation needed]"
Considering that there is no citation, this should be deleted.
Thank you
24.188.100.213 (talk) 12:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: A citation has been provided for this statement. clpo13(talk) 07:14, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 May 2016
Talk:Guerrero Negro

message: [A] choice hunting ground for Yankee and European whalers.
Oftentimes in Spanish, Yankee is derogatory.  I question its usage and am changing it to American (with an interwiki link to the meaning of American as US citizens).
71.165.132.175 (talk) 20:34, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The term Yankee 
Talk:El Pescadero

message: i heard that one of the beaches was a turtle sanctuary. Can anyone give me any detaiks on this?````  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.137.135.255 (talk) 00:35, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turtles 
Talk:Joe Szakos

message: The article calls him a "community organizer" but gives no indication of what his issues or, or even what side he might be on politically. One can work it out by following up links to the groups he's worked with, but perhaps someone should make some of this more explicit here in the article. (I was just passing through for some hit-and-run link-related work). - Jmabel | Talk 18:50, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A bit vague
Talk:Florida State Road 17

message: The length of 130 km cannot be right. According to Google Maps it looks like around 80 km instead. Maybe the numbers were accidentally switched between km and mi? Regards, Dionysos1988 (talk) 00:47, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length 
Talk:Florida State Road 540

message: What ever says that SR 540 goes further than its intersection with US 98, I can't find it.  Google Maps shows the road ending at US 98, so seeing no sources suggesting otherwise, I will adjust the length and route to fit this.  I also thought the road continued past US 27 eastward along Waverly Road, but Google Maps says otherwise in this case as well. Simplebutpowerful 21:01, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Western terminus? 
Talk:Muktyala Raja

message: Something about this article doesn't sound right.  There are references but all link to engagements page in Hindu.  Until I get up the learning curve on Wikipedia, somebody take notice of this article and clean it up a bit.  Thanks. Unslung 01:25, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is the life history of a man who single handedly worked for a common cause in a selfless manner. If any specific objection is pointed out, I am ready to modify the sentences. I pruned the references.Kumarrao (talk) 09:53, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I did full clean up in compliance with peacock and subjective tags, added relevant source, infobox and stub template since most of the information could not be cited and the previous references were not reliable. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 19:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Alpha Centauri (Doctor Who)

message: One shown near the end of Empress of Mars. The voice was recognisably Alpha Centauri, and the creature self-identified as such. I have no idea whether it's intended as the same one from old Who, but it's certainly a member of the same species. Dsalt (talk) 19:10, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Who 
Talk:Alfie Michaud

message: Hi, my name is Molly Jenkins and I have been reviewing this Wikipedia page about Alfie Michaud. There is a lot of very good and relevant information throughout the page, but I would like to point out that reference number 5 is no longer accessible. When clicking on the link it brings you to a website that is not available. I hope this helps to improve the article as a whole. Molly Jenkins (talk) 03:33, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have added content to this Alfie Michaud Wikipedia web page, and hope that the information presented to the public will allow them to better understand and appreciate Alfie more as an athlete of Aboriginal descent. Molly Jenkins (talk) 13:58, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions
Talk:Transfusion reaction

message: The threshold at which iron overload becomes significant is somewhat unclear??? 
please do more research on iron overload.
The list is confusing... it says a febrile-non-hemolytic reaction is the most common type, and then says that bacterial infection is a much more common problem. Clarification would be appreciated.
24.141.27.157 01:43, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

message: sorry for so many separate edits in a row. I think this article needs some time and effort to be put into it. I've added to my watch list and may one day have time to do something. don't count on me though. forgetful (talk) 16:51, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  multiple edits 

message: I am a physician and usually the risk of Hepatitis C is considered to be be less than 1 in every 2 million blood transfusions. The risk for acquiring HIV from a single blood transfusion is similar. See the Merck Manual online: http://www.merck.com/mmpe/sec11/ch146/ch146e.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.246.105.84 (talk) 06:05, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  risk of hepatitis and HIV appear wrong to me. 

message: I am going to merge this section into the main section in Blood transfusion because it creates a much better flow, than a solitary page with a tabular view, which I am not sure why. I may not be able to merge certain minute details such as references there but if anyone wants to merge them, please feel free. I agree with above post that certain factual information on this page is erroneous. 
Shaolin md (talk) 17:35, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge