lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Batanta

message: Batanta is a part of West Papua province as well as all Raja Ampat islands. 90.151.43.240 (talk) 13:39, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  West Papua 
Category talk:Adjustment disorders

message: There do not appear to be separate articles on each DSM-IV Adjustment disorder, nor does there seem to me a need for there to be one.
* Adjustment Disorders
** 309.9 Unspecified
** 309.24 With Anxiety
** 309.0 With Depressed Mood
** 309.3 With Disturbance of Conduct
** 309.28 With Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood
** 309.4 With Mixed Disturbance of Emotions and Conduct
Sincerely, Mattisse 18:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [untitled]
Talk:1967 Palestinian exodus

message: As far as I know, the other two villages are Yalu and Beit Nuba.--Doron 18:44, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  destroyed villages 

message: *gained by Israel - no they werent, they were captured and have been occupied since
Some of the reorganization is fine, but something this short doesnt need sections. The removed material is however not fine. nableezy - 18:46, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  recent edits 

message: There's a big difference between an exodus and genocidal ethnic cleansing. 1967, like 1947-1949 was a genocidal ethnic cleansing not some voluntary "exodus". MathewMunro (talk) 02:58, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article's title is Zionist propaganda.
Talk:Joseph Sec

message: Pictures of Joseph Sec himself would be good.Zigzig20s 15:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  reqphoto 
Talk:Luxuriant Dew of the Spring and Autumn Annals

message: Is "Chunqiu fanlou" a mistake for Chunqiu fanlu? Wenlin gives: lù 露 "dew; show, reveal, betray", lòu 露 (colloquial) "reveal", and fánlù 繁露 "fringe of a ceremonial hat". Keahapana (talk) 01:44, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misspelled title 
Talk:Béchamp reduction

message: N.B. In Vogel page 892, Sn metal is used instead of iron for nitrobenzene to aniline, but this might be differently priced?--79.74.9.50 (talk) 20:52, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: for that reason we refer readers to Reduction of nitro compounds. --Smokefoot (talk) 11:41, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Sn
Talk:Schmidt reaction

message: Schmidt, K.F.: Angew. Chem. 36, 1923, 511 is also listed as article for the Schmidt reaction. S discovered 1923.--Stone (talk) 18:50, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 1923 or 1924

message: I feel that as drawn, the curly arrows on intermediate 2 are somewhat confusing, especially to those who are new to this class of arrangements. I assume that the mechanism as depicted suggests that lone pair of the nitrogen bonded to carbon is pushed to the C-N bond. This means the tail of the arrow should be positioned over the nitrogen, not the nitrogen-nitrogen single bond. As drawn, it seems to imply that the diazonium is acting as the electrofuge, when in reality it's invariably a nucleofuge. Either way, I think the lone pair need not be explicitly invoked in this scenario, as one could simply draw the R group migrating to nitrogen concurrent with the elimination of N2, which will also lead to a resonance form of 3.
--129.105.149.247 (talk) 21:35, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Mechanism 1, intermediate 2

message: The first step in the mechanism showing conversion of a carboxylic acid into an amine is incorrect.  Protonation of a carboxylic acid occurs at the carbonyl oxygen not the hydroxy oxygen.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.48.19.23 (talk) 20:57, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mechanism 1
Talk:Steps to Christ

message: I find it odd that we mention the title of the Spanish translation of this book (El camino a Cristo) but not the titles of any of the other 149 or so translations. I'm removing the Spanish one, as giving undue focus on the Spanish version. --Cromwellt|talk|contribs 04:22, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanish title given
Talk:Walter Weller

message: There is a bit of confusion in some of the reports on Weller's dates as principal conductor of the Scottish National Orchestra.  The Wilson obituary, for example, gives the dates as 1991 to 1996, yet at the same states that Weller began his tenure in 1991.  The RSNO's own website gives 1992-1997 as the official dates of his tenure as principal conductor, so that settles the matter.  DJRafe (talk) 13:19, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: SNO tenure
Talk:Drostanolone propionate

message: These items were listed as references, but they do not appear to be complete.  Also, there was no indication that they were used to support any content in the article, so I have more them here for now:
* Cancer Res. 1982 Nov;42(11):4408-12 Marin P, Oden B, and Bjorntorp P. Assimilation and mobilization of triglycerides in subcutaneous abdominal and femoral adipose tissue in vivo in men: effects of androgens. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80: 239-243, 1995
* Sem Hop. 1982 Sep 23;58(34):1919-23.
-- Ed (Edgar181) 14:25, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: The listed CAS number is for drostanolone. If you check the "drostanolone" Wikipedia entry, you will find the exact same CAS number. 
The correct CAS number for drostanolone propionate is 521-12-0. 
This can be verified by examining the following NIST monograph: http://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?ID=521-12-0&Units=SI&cMS=on
R Andrew Barber (talk) 20:14, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemical Abstract Services (CAS) number is not correct
Talk:Walberswick

message: The First Picture Of You song music video (1983) by The Lotus Eaters was filmed there - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYdiP8dG2gE  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.16.72.221 (talk) 16:53, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: The Lotus Eaters band made a pop video there

message: I've removed the needs more citations tag since there are no parts of the article flagged as needing a citation.  Please add a tag to the fact that needs citing if restoring the tag.  Thanks.--Phil Holmes (talk) 11:04, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Talk:Mugging (robbery)

message: 'Mugging' was the creation of the Victorian age, or at least the popular anxiety associated with the crime is. It began with the 'garotting panic' of 1862. Assailants would attack a victim from the back, half-throttle and then rob him. The technique itself had been learned from the practice in convict ships, where it was used in restraining prisoners. The panic began when an MP was attacked in this fashion after leaving a late sitting in the Commons. Soon the press was full of adverts for 'anti-garotte collars' for gentlemen! Clio the Muse 22:40, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin (copied from [[WP:RD/H]])
Talk:Congressional Order of Merit

message: Article flagged for lack of sources - fair enough. There seems to be lack of "reliable sources," but at some point, a preponderance of anecdotal sources *might* suffice:   
* John Carroll commentary on NPR (near end of 3-minute audio)
* The Scientific Activist
* Army of One
* Thirteen Colonies
* Robert Coats' Answering machine
Samatva 17:16, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Francis O. Belzer

message: The current single source claims to be from a scrapbook clipping from an unknown (maybe it was the Indianapolis Star) newspaper.  That's not a reliable source that can be verified. Searching today finds minor mentions in scouting or religion related books. Items published by the Boy Scouts of America would not be independent. Because we require significant coverage by multiple independent reliable sources notability is in question. Gab4gab (talk) 15:30, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Template talk:Animal communication

message: What's with this template?  It seems to confabulate language and communication.  Which one is it about? The title in wikispace is "Animal language", but the title one the templace which appears in article space is "Animal communication".  The lists of "communicative" birds (which ought to be every single one, they all communicate, redirects to the category "Talking birds", which are birds mimicing human speech (a sensible category, but nowhere near the same meaning as "communicating birds").  I think this template needs a good long coffee-soaked rethink before it gets used, because it's not being used well now. Pete.Hurd 19:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bill Ward

message: I should have kept the parentheticals in; that was my fault.  
As for the format, I'm gonna go with Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages):
:For people, include their birth and death years (when known), 'and only enough descriptive information that the reader can distinguish between different people with the same name. ... Do not include a, an or the before the description of the person's occupation or role.
--Tenebrae 19:04, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki formatting
Talk:VistA Imaging

message: This program is at the center of the national debate for healthcare Information Technology nationwide. Its existence in the public domain is of major signficance.
Physadvoc 19:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tambora culture

message: The terming of this small culture as a separate "civilization" is an example of media hype.  A non-isolated village of 10,000 people would never be described as a civilization while it existed.  Since the village was destroyed, calling it a "lost civilization" makes the story more romantic, but this is not accurate.  The article title should be changed to something like Tambora (culture).  WolfmanSF 20:25, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. Ok, so how about moving this page to Tambora (culture), Tambora (village), or Tambora (people)? Thanks. ~AH1(TCU) 22:00, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  inappropriate article title 

message: 10,000 people is not a village. It is a large town or small city, even by modern standards, and this is before the population explosion of the past century. Calling it a village shows a huge anti-native bias. 45.47.206.125 (talk) 17:14, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Village?
Talk:Namond Brice

message: One of the links is dead. should it be deleted?
Does anyone else think its a strange plot line to have Colvin adopt namond? I didnt fully understand that's what happened until I saw the city wide debate. What about de'londa? she really just gave up her kid after raising him for that long?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iownatv (talk • contribs) 02:50, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not a forum, try the IMDB message board here .--Opark 77 (talk) 09:28, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Last couple lines of Season 4 description says he mirrors D'Angelo. Was this ever stated by David Simon? My understanding was that Namond was, perhaps, mirroring Clay Davis and his upbringing. This may even have been alluded to in the show, as both Namond and Clay have the same line "I'll take any mother fuckers money if they're just giving it away". Namond is also seen to be taking the path of politics with his school debate in Season 5. In my opinion, there is very little to connect Namond and D'Angelo - the "domineering mothers" thing aside, and even that has some problems (Brianna shows a lot more love and regret over D'Angelo than De'Londa ever showed to Namond).
69.84.24.114 (talk) 21:01, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small issue
Talk:List of radio stations in Bandung

message: bandung sebagai sebuah kota ternyata hanya bagian terkecil dari yang dimaksud bandung....ada kota bandung...ada kabupaten bandung...ada kabupaten bandung barat...jadi radio bandung yang di kota sama radio bandung yang di kabupaten bandung apakah sebagai yang di maksud radio bandung atau bukan ????????????  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.161.180.213 (talk) 08:36, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  radio bandung itu yang mana ??? 

message: Please use english here - thank you SatuSuro 13:27, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: English Wikipedia

message: Seems like it is table layout is wrong , may need someone to help correct it.Encik Tekateki (talk) 00:59, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table layout wrong
Talk:Trimethylamine N-oxide

message: Dear all,
If somebody knwoledgeable in this field could find out good reference to replace [^ Hazen, Stanley. "New Research On Red Meat And Heart Disease". The Diane Rehm Show (Transcript). WAMU 88.5 American University Radio. Retrieved 10 April 2013.] that would be great. Without criticizing or challenging the persons participating in this talk themselves, this is "just" a radio interview transcript, and IMHO not of sufficient quality to be used as the single reference to support a complicated, comprehensive and potentially controversial statement such as "TMAO alters cholesterol metabolism in the intestines, in the liver, and in artery wall. In the presence of TMAO, there is increased deposition of cholesterol in, and decreased removal of cholesterol from, peripheral cells such as those in the artery wall." --MarmotteiNoZ 00:52, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: And a better source than the New York Times.  NYT is a nice newspaper but seems like an weird source to support technical claims.  Folks are keen to edit, often without regard to their access or knowledge of sources.--Smokefoot (talk) 13:02, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: NYT's articles are usually based on an underlying journal article. That was true in my recent edits here. However, I did not look up the article in this case. That can be done. There are two journal articles one on red meat the other on eggs. User:Fred Bauder Talk 13:43, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added the two underlying journal articles, one from Nature Medicine, the other from The New England Journal of Medicine. User:Fred Bauder Talk 11:39, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better refs needed 

message: See http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2015-01/cc-gb012815.php
I can't trace a proper reference to the original study and didn't want to add it without. 87.113.236.218 (talk) 15:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also implicated in chronic kidney disease
Talk:Bell System Operating Company

message: I noted that another user had deleted this page and re-directed the term "Bell Operating Company" and "Bell System Operating Company" to an article entitled "Bell System".  That article is a much more comprehensive treatment of the Bell System and a reader attempting to ascertain exactly what a "Bell Operating Company" is (or was) might have difficulty understanding, especially if they were a lay person-- someone who didn't live it.  That article also lists the former BOCs by starting out where they ended up-- instead of starting out where they existed just prior to divestiture which can be confusing to the uninitiated. It also uses industry terms (e.g."LEC") without definition. The "Bell System" article is fine for what it is. This article was written to specifically answer the question "What is (was) a Bell Operating Company?" and complements other articles about the Bell System.  This article specifically makes reference to the "Bell System" article should the reader be looking for a more comprehensive treatment. Thor21 19:31, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Topographic isolation

message: This needs a source---it seems to be from peakbagger, correct? -- Spireguy 19:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This information came from several sources, primarily peakbagger.com.  --Buaidh 20:33, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: I played a little bit with GoogleEarth and found a peak which is signifcantly closer to the Pico da Bandeira than the value given in this table here. These are the coordinates: 21°18'54.34S 64°19'38.61"W ... Maybe someone could check it out. I get a value of 2285,9 km from PdB to the next heighest point. -- 178.27.192.223 (talk) 18:10, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: What's the reference peak for #21: Pico da Bandeira?

message: Neither Elbrus nor Caucasus in general are located in Europe. The border between continents runs much more to the North.31.0.125.48 (talk) 00:03, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Europe is a good place to start. Andrewgprout (talk) 17:36, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not in Europe 

message: says Joes Hill has a topographic isolation of 1902.85 km / 1182.38 mi, so it should be in the list, imho. --Cmuelle8 (talk) 19:57, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joes Hill missing 

message: Thabana Ntlenyana's 'Nearest Higher Neighbor' is listed on this page as Mount Meru, which makes sense intuitively at first glance... however Peakbagger, the main source for this page's information (as far as I can tell), clearly lists the NHN as Mount Loolmalasin. The difference in overall isolation distance is likely less than a kilometer, but surely the NHN on this page should be updated accordingly? Anyone more experienced on this topic have thoughts? SunTunnels (talk) 07:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thabana Ntlenyana NHN confusion
Talk:Baer–Babinet law

message: Please define what you mean by the left or right banks. Do you mean the north or south banks? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.0.132.57 (talk • contribs) 
: At Right Bank (disambiguation), it says:
: 
:: The right bank of a river is the side to one's right while facing downstream.
: 
: Michael Hardy 19:46, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Although its not common English usage (its a Frenchism I think). 82.68.102.190 (talk) 19:42, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

text: It seems self-explanatory. Michael Hardy (talk) 20:50, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Left bank? Right bank? 

message: Logic says in syllogism - if water flows down-hill over rock, then eventually, the precious metal or mineral will wash down to the valley. Further, if the matter (gold & mineral) is heavier than water, then force and gravity will distribute the matter.  Force (water current) will push the matter down the path of least resistance. Gravity will attract that matter to the centre of the earth. Therefore, matter is washed from the hills to the centre and sides of the water-flow.  Stream tests have shown that sediment will gather at the bend in the stream (water-flow) but (gold) accumulation, in the centre, is just theory. Please comment.
172.162.120.144 (talk) 13:59, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Placer gold accumulation 

message: Actually, Baer first published his description in the Courier of Astrakhan Governorate in 1856: Бэр К. Обмеление устьев пек вообще и реки Волги в особенности. Астраханские губернские ведомости, 1856, No. 40, с. 149-151. Also, the claim about the ineffectuality of Coriolis' force might be somewhat incompatible with the original article by Einstein, so you better check it up. --82.131.109.135 (talk) 20:27, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong dating
Template talk:Edsall class destroyer escort

message: This template is incorrect as to USS Gary DE-326. It should read USS Thomas J. Gary DE-326.
DANFS notes: "Gary (DE-326) was renamed Thomas J. Gary 1 January 1945" (since the name Gary was already in use by DE-61).
See: Gary
Please correct the template. Thanks.
Wikited 19:46, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Hour of Victory

message: The whole article is about how bad the reviews are, and tells absolutely nothing about the game itself. 162.136.192.1 (talk) 22:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Okay the Joke of claiming Hour of Victory was a good game is over. Now leave it alone!(217.43.117.215 (talk) 17:22, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jokes over 
Talk:Invisible Plane

message: Our article currently states:
Having "died" to save so many, Dome is now the equivalent of a human corpse. While it can still function in its traditional shape of an invisible plane, it can no longer alter its shape and is now a lifeless inanimate object that is neither intelligent nor self-aware.
Wow, I'd sure rather have Dome than a human corpse lying around! Seriously, a human corpse can not "function" at all. It can only rot and fall apart. Okay, human corpses are useful to insects, but that's hardly comparable to an invisible plane.
I suggest somebody who is familiar with Wonder Woman and Dome re-phrase this. I am sure the original author had a point, but s/he hasn't nailed it with this "equivalent of a human corpse".
--Ben Culture (talk) 03:22, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly, I think the whole sentence might need to be taken out as original research, but I rephrased it to "...to save so many, Dome is now more like a robot than a person." I'm familiar with Wonder Woman but not Dome, sorry - just basing this on the sentence that follows. Birdsinthewindow (talk) 20:05, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dome is now the equivalent of a human corpse." 

message: "It was created by William Moulton Marston as an allegory for how women of the  Depression Era onward had come into the male dominated work place in droves, unchallenged and how those women's readier compliance, among other factors, made that possible."
Can someone check the source to see if it actually says this? Seems implausible, but I can't verify it myself. Birdsinthewindow (talk) 20:01, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked into it earlier, and fount that it was originally put in by driveby IP vandal in May 2014. I removed it on 19 April 2017. No source supports the claim. Someone must have re-added it since, I removed it again. Herostratus (talk) 13:36, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Um, what? 

message: All the images on this page are copyrighted, it says they are beeing used under "fair use", but i dont see how thats true. The original uploader deleted his account so i cannot contact him 2804:7F0:B182:338F:C488:2E26:FE03:7BFF (talk) 14:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You can see the full fair use rationale on the file pages: :File:Wonder Woman 311.jpg and :File:Invisible plane.jpg. The policy on fair use images is here: Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy. Toughpigs (talk) 16:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyrighted images
Talk:The Plumm

message: There is a wiki page for Nell's. We feel we should add one about The Plumm, seeing as how it is the current resident in the same space, and currently open. I will be upkeeping and adding pictures and content as time goes by, I'm just starting to learn how to do all of this
--Noelashman 19:50, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this article is worth keeping, as it provides insight into the owning celebrities. Mikedelsol (talk) 09:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Keep this article
Talk:Wheel of Birmingham

message: I have done some updating of this article, including photos of the Third Wheel (operational November 2009 to February 2010).  It may be enough to allow the "update template" of 20/11/09 to be removed.  Would anyone with more experience in assessing when an article meets the criteria please remove the template.  
The range of photos, including from near Barr Beacon, is to prove my claim that it is a distinctive feature visible from a distance.  There is no available reference to another published article to verify this.  Although Wikipedia is not intended to be a photo gallery, there is no other practical way of establishing this type of encyclopaedic statement.  --  Robert of Ramsor (talk) 00:38, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update template on Wheel of Birmingham article