Talk:Hurricane Alex (2004)

message: I ain't no shit about meteorology so please someone correct any errors. I copy/pasted the info from the 2004 Atlantic hurricane season article and wrote the introduction from that same information. I'm not sure if the information that I wrote on the introduction is correct or not. Thanks in advance!  —John | Talk 19:33, Aug 14, 2004 (UTC)
:I'm confused. You are disputing your own accuracy? -- Cyrius|✎ 19:41, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Watch your language theres other people using this talk page. 164.106.201.50 17:07, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy dispute

message: Flooding was not light!  The water rose 5ft in less than half and hour!
:Where? What basin? When? -- Cyrius|✎ 11:36, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Light Flooding?

message: Storm not that notable. The article is pretty shallow. Unless more info can be found, I vote merge. -- Hurricane Eric archive -- my dropsonde 03:29, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Discounting the storm history section and the trivia (which is too trivial even to qualify as trivia), I agree the impact section is too short to justify an article.  Only a little, though. Jdorje 03:33, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Well then what do you think about Hurricane Earl (1998)? — jdorje (talk) 20:59, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Earl doesn't have the problem of being in a season with too long of a seasonal article. This could stay, provided more is added. Hurricanehink 16:06, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: This article is linked from Hurricane Dennis which will be featured on the front page tomorrow.  So we should try to fix this article up a little bit today. — jdorje (talk) 19:49, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  fixes 

message: OK, I rewrote the article. Any comments or suggestions? Hurricanehink (talk) 20:54, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing major I can see, but several small tweaks. I think "Trivia" is should be renamed, Landfall is currently a disambiguation, pipe to Landfall (meteorology) instead, MODIS imagery is available, some missing metric conversions, if there's a photo of any damage in Carolina it would be nice too and so on... All minor things, its B-class in my view (however you know I might be biased there....)--Nilfanion (talk) 21:17, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, got metric. I emailed someone about the NC photo, so I'm waiting on that (no PD ones). I renamed Trivia to records. I changed landfall's link, but I'm not so sure we should be linking there. The landfall page is pretty bad now. So is it B class? And don't worry about the bias... :) Hurricanehink (talk) 21:39, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, I like the way things are shaping up. By the time I escape 2005, the 2004 storm articles will be B-class, like this one.--Nilfanion (talk) 21:43, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what I'm hoping for. Hurricanehink (talk) 21:58, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redone 

message: I would also work on the prose of the Preparations and Impact sections since it doesn't flow too much when you read it. Lincher 14:18, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promoted to GA 

message: *Charleston, SC report
*Wilmington, NC report
*Raleigh, NC report
*Morehead City, NC report
This is for reference, and if not done so already they should be included in the article. Hurricanehink (talk) 17:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NWS reports 

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 21:17, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Pass

message: Fcaseymgt (talk) 19:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hurricane Alex: Impact on a sailing boat. 

message: I think the maximum wind speed was 120 mph.  It showed 165 in the box on the right.  I changed it to 120, but it shows 140 instead.  Could someone please fix it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.225.106.84 (talk) 03:31, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wind Speed 

message: The Ocracoke portion of the aftermath section keeps on referring to Dare county. However, Ocracoke is located in Hyde county, not Dare - as well as Swan Quarter (corrected that bit) which is the Hyde county seat. The reference given is unfortunately no longer available. Ivan Scott Warren (talk) 17:26, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dare County ? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Alex (2004). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060522040428/http://rdu.news14.com/content/weather/weather_stories/?ArID=52524&SecID=299 to http://rdu.news14.com/content/weather/weather_stories/?ArID=52524&SecID=299
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:59, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Hurricane Alex (2004). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061114070250/http://rdu.news14.com/content/weather/weather_stories/?ArID=52465&SecID=299 to http://rdu.news14.com/content/weather/weather_stories/?ArID=52465&SecID=299
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120206130224/http://www.outer-banks.com/ecnews/2042index.asp to http://www.outer-banks.com/ecnews/2042index.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120206130224/http://www.outer-banks.com/ecnews/2042index.asp to http://www.outer-banks.com/ecnews/2042index.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:11, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified