lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bug

message: I commented out the section for Bruno as it appeared out of place. --Midnightcomm 22:41, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bruno  

message: I'm surprised this is still so off base.  Check most any dictionary (OED, dictionary.com, AKA American Heritage, Wiktionary), and the primary definition for bug is: a member of the order Hemiptera (or Heteroptera), i.e. the so-called "true bugs".  I'm adding this to the article for now, but in my opinion the proper course is to redirect bug to Hemiptera and move the existing article to bug (dab) where it belongs.  --Chinasaur 14:16, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  True bugs 

message: read cockroach war!!!!!!!!!
(it is a good bug book —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 154.20.179.118 (talk) 00:38, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  bug book 

message: The colloquial definition of "bug" said it "usually excepting crustaceans."  I changed this to "excepting most crustaceans," because there are crustaceans that are practically never colloquially referred to as "bugs" (e.g., lobsters), but on the other hand there are crustaceans that are frequently colloquially referred to as bugs (e.g. pill bugs and sow bugs). PubliusFL 16:35, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I remember the PC game A Bug's Life Activity Center including a slug as a creature photographable with the bug camera although it is agreed in the photo album's facts that slugs are not insects nor relatives of the spider. The slug also appears in the film A Bug's Life as a customer of the bug bar. In real life, the slug comes under the definition of what is known in the primary school curriculum as a minibeast which is commonly defined as small invertibrates such as arthropods, gastropods and worms. By the sound of it the word "bug" is colloquially used to refer to any minibeast. Tk420 (talk) 22:58, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Colloquial definition

message: Why modification of 17:00, 6 August 2007 was reverted?
There were added:
* Pathfinding algorithms for sensor-based intellectual agents
Why was it added? Which algorthms are called "bug"? Please read the rules about disambiguation pages`'Míkka 16:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pathfinding algorithms 

message: The tardigrade, a minute maggot-like creature related to worms and arthropods, which withstands environmental extremes and sometimes reduces to a mouth-only condition, seems a bug par excellence, the creature for which the term 'bug' seems to have been devised - yet it appears to be excluded from the definitions.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.194.75.209 (talk) 17:14, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about tardigrades? 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Bug (disambiguation). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 13#Bug (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  TigraanClick here for my talk page ("private" contact) 16:01, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bug (disambiguation)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Alexander Sergeevich Yakovlev

message: Alexander Sergeevich Yakovlev was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made below the archived discussion rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was REDIRECT
Duplicate of Alexander Sergeyevich Yakovlev (note extra 'y') which includes slightly more information. Dbiv 00:56, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there any reason you don't want to simply redirect these? They don't need to be listed on VfD to be turned into redirects. older≠wiser 02:22, Nov 4, 2004 (UTC)
* Agree.  There is also Wikipedia:Duplicate articles to handle these if you aren't sure what to merge. -- Netoholic @ 02:55, 2004 Nov 4 (UTC)
*Did you guys actually look at this?  Redirect?  From one substub to another?  They're both deletion candidates for being zero content.  This one as much as the other.  Delete. Geogre 03:26, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Aleksandr Yakovlev

message: Aleksandr Yakovlev was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made below the archived discussion rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was REDIRECT
Another substub duplicate. Dbiv 01:25, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Michael K. Dorsey

message: Hi, your Wesleyan link goes to the Wesleyan Disambig page, so I piped it to "Methodism." Feel free to pipe it to something else if I mis-interpreted the usage.
--Asbestos 01:28, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What are the sources for this information? Is there an external link to a personal webpage? - Ta bu shi da yu 10:24, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 

message: I added the sections tag.  This needs to be cleaned up.  Autumninjersey 05:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections 

message: I'm pretty sure the Wikipedia user "Thecompilers" is Dorsey himself. He hasn't done anything wrong in editing this entry, but it's worth keeping in mind. Digamma (talk) 02:35, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-editing
Talk:J. L. Carr

message: Hi, your Wesleyan link goes to the Wesleyan Disambig page, so I piped it to "John Wesley." Feel free to pipe it to something else if I mis-interpreted the usage.
--Asbestos 01:30, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Hi all, just to let you know that The Laurence Sterne Trust have donated some great images that may be useful here or elsewhere: Images of JL Carr's map of Yorkshire. Feel free to get in touch if you'd like to find out more or have other requests/suggestions PatHadley (talk) 12:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. I have added one to the page. Nedrutland (talk) 12:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: [[commons:Category:JL Carr|Images of JL Carr's map of Yorkshire]]
Talk:Kingsley College Australia

message: Hi, your Wesleyan link goes to the Wesleyan Disambig page, so I piped it to "Methodism." Feel free to pipe it to something else if I mis-interpreted the usage.
--Asbestos 01:43, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Disamb

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20160301191612/http://www.kingsley.edu.au/files/Kingsley%20Community%20Handbook%202016.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!  18:43, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Women and Children First

message: This anecdote was moved from the band article and hopefully can be used by someone on the album page:
* (and in the case of the Wurlitzer electric piano on 1980 single "And the Cradle Will Rock", easily mistaken for rhythm guitar),
*Added.  Thanks!  --Cholmes75 18:29, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved factoids

message: Does this album contain a hidden track, called "Growth"? StevePrutz 15:09, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hidden track?

message: Why did it get deleted? 
216.145.173.234 (talk) 18:04, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romeo Delight page
Talk:Fair Warning (Van Halen album)

message: Does anyone own this on Vinyl? CDs were not released until 82 some time, so this would have been on Vinyl first, thus it needs Side One and Side Two information. 
Quote:
Wikipedia:ALBUM#Track_listing Albums originally released primarily on vinyl or cassette should similarly list the tracks of each side separately under sub-headings named "Side one" and "Side two"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Axcess (talk • contribs) 19:49, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vinyl

message: Shouldn't we use another sign for the singles?
I first thought it was a list of the deads.
Something like * or something. But not an christian cross at least!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.23.119.149 (talk) 00:21, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ...

message: why use "Fair Warning" for the name of an album when there is a band called "Fair Warning"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.56.30.178 (talk) 19:58, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  alter site name 
Talk:List of poetry collections

message: I am a bit confused about what should and should not be included in this List. I came here from a link at List of poetry anthologies. I see many of the books in this list are ones that I would consider to be anthologies. My assumption is that a "poetry collection" would be a collection of poems from a single author. gK 04:00, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Inclusion criteria

message: This list is almost completely useless as an encyclopedic reference. the list is woefully inadequate, and is a target for self promotion from at least one poet who is not as notable as the majority here. This should be, after 6 years without comments, either fixed or deleted.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:51, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Useless

message: I've been working on this article for the last few weeks, and will continue to do so. It is a work in progress, and the only goal is to revise this article to make it an encyclopaedic list.--ColonelHenry (talk) 14:50, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision: MAY2013 and ongoing - Inclusion Criteria
Talk:Tropical astrology

message: Deleting racist vandalism by 24.112.128.253
Changing "United States" to "the Americas," as tropical astrology is the norm in Brazil as well, at least, if not the rest of South America.
Shouldn't this list of dates be in Sidereal zodiac?  Tropical zodiac doesn't use them, right? DenisMoskowitz 15:23, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have moved them Lumos3 16:39, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

text: A very nice clear edit. I have made a minor addition to siderial criticisms. Lumos3 22:08, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

text: The constellations are changing apparent position due to 'precession of the equinoxes'. It's worth noting that precession does not affect tropical astrology, just sidereal astrology. It has nothing directly to do with 2012.(Xpaulk (talk) 12:25, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:USS Palmer

message: My brother died on the USS PALMER when it sank in 1945. I was 10 years old at the time. This is my first visit to this website. I would like to contact any survivors and get as much info as I can about the ship. I would also like to get a photo of the ship. I appreciate any info.
Thank you sincerely,
Billy Blanton
I just received my Grandfather's Navy records that state he was on board the USS Palmer when it sank.  I remember stories about it when I was a kid, but never knew the facts.  Is there a USS Palmer Memorial or anything?
Thanks for your time,
Barry Mooney  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Barrydjr (talk • contribs) 17:32, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Memorial?
Talk:Diver Down

message: Does anyone know if this was first released on Vinyl or CD? Axcess (talk) 19:46, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Format

message: Under the full bug it says: "And these were also great shoes for when the cockroach moves into the corner and you get at it with your foot or the broom anymore."   It seems to me it should say: "and you CAN'T get at it with your foot". Does anyone have an original copy of the article to clarify this?  Snowfreak91287 (talk) 08:22, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Full Bug 

message: While this is a great piece, does it really deserve its own song number?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kude90 (talk • contribs) 02:59, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Little Guitars (Intro)" 

message: Seriously, people, the album title is a well-known reference to cunnilingus.  Why is that so difficult to state?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.27.197 (talk) 20:04, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Title 

message: I thought that this was popular enough to have been a single.  Surprised it isn't Tomada36 (talk) 02:50, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little Guitars wasn't a single?
Talk:Alex Scott/VfD

message: Alexandra Scott was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made below the archived discussion rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP
non-encyclopedic, non-notable, possibly vanity. Article states person made the news, so have I, is that a reason to include them? They certainly didnt make the news here. was unaware of the Oprah connection, means about 14million women have heard of her, makes it a keep Alkivar 04:28, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: appears i'm the only one who considers this non-notable, I surrender to the small consensus. Alkivar 01:13, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:5150 (album)

message: If you want to edit parts you feel are not "attributable" please feel free to remove those sections, however, removing entire sections is vandalism unless you can prove they are untrue or untenable, especially with regards to section which require no citation (tracklisting, etc.) Mooshimanx 00:01, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what's considered "original research" or unverified on this page...Mooshimanx 17:47, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thriller is best selling globally ever. Eagles/Thriller change places every now and then as best selling in THE USA. RIAA covers USA SALES ONLY.(The Elfoid 01:37, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: reference for the Jimmy Barnes info... https://amp.triplem.com.au/story/jimmy-barnes-shares-the-story-of-the-time-eddie-van-halen-asked-him-to-join-van-halen-167626  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.102.25.62 (talk) 03:27, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jimmy Barnes info 

message: The user FlightTime, is adding an unsourced genre and denying the already previously sourced ones, see 5150 (album)#Music section, these are the sourced genres, hard rock is not one of them. 2600:1004:B1DF:D2D9:6545:6EC:186E:F8C7 (talk) 21:50, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I restored the established genres, from this revision.  - FlightTime (open channel) 21:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced genre being added
Talk:OU812

message: What evidence is there that Sammy Hagar played any guitar on this album? Someoneinmyheadbutit'snotme 01:28, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: http://www.martinpopoff.com/html/yeold.html
--Axcess (talk) 13:56, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Info to look at
Talk:For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge

message: Does anyone have a better album cover image? Bry9000 (talk) 02:47, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: better

message: I've read that this is also the title of a Coven song. Perhaps something about this could be mentioned in the article? Gringo300 (talk) 17:35, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Coven
Talk:John Pople

message: Hello all!  I am John Pople's grandaughter, Kimberly, and I was completely amazed to find that my grandad was on this webpage!  I heard about this page and came here just typing in random things and found this page!  I often underestimated my grandad's celebrity and think that it's great that people are so interested in his work.  I wish that this page would have more about my grandfather's personal life though, because he was very devoted to his wife and family and they were so much a part of his life.  Maybe just a little more bio kind of things.  I could certainly put this on, but didn't know if it was appropriate to this site.  If anyone could let me know, I would be very appreciative.  Thanks so much!
Surely you are welcome to write something of Prof. Pople; others will modify it if they find it not appropriate for Wikipedia. Powermac 05:26, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: He moved to the United States of America in the early 1960s, where he lived the rest of his life, though he retained British citizenship. He received his B. A. (in 1946) and doctorate (in 1951) 
John moved to America in the early 1960s, and lived there until die but He received his B. A. (in 1946) and doctorate (in 1951)?--Snowyowls 14:03, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here may be something wrong 

message: I think the statement that John Pople was banned by Gaussian needs evidence. I do not believe it is strictly correct, but I do not have evidence. Also I am not sure that PPP was his first major contribution. I thought stuff on NMR was. --Bduke 23:09, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed that statement. It's a bit unusual of a statement to make without sources. --HappyCamper 13:36, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edit
Talk:Selsoviet

message: I was tempted to add a sentnce
:Formally, a selsoviet was supposed to be elected by a Rural Meeting (сельский сход), but this was hardly ever done in practice.
But then became unsure in its correctness. It was surely so in early times. But does anybody remember what was the statute of a Selsovet in late Soviet Union? Mikkalai 05:52, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: Wikipedia editors constantly use the term federal subject of Russia regarding cities, provinces, counties, "republics", and "Russian oblasts" now during the invasion of the nation of the Ukraine by Russia. The sovereignity and territorial boundaries of the Ukraine were affirmed by the UN in 2022 post Russian Federation's "declaration of war or special military operations" on February 23, 2022 in New York City, USA.
This article, by the way, began with Germans as a minority, post public notification on 1939 invasion in WWII of Poland by Germany and Russia, and German concentration camps. Wiki articles have Germans and Russians fighting in Eastern Europe for control post WWII, with no western nations involved in any manner! Right now, 31 Russian indigeneous groups with "voting republics" (e.g., Buddhists or shamanists; Turkish-Finnish populations; Mongolia and East Asian Chinese) declaring war on Ukraine?!
2603:7081:2000:3EF3:24A4:539E:AAAC:B0D9 (talk) 16:59, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Federal subjects of Russia
Talk:Alrewas

message: lets try and include countries, I'm guessing Britain due to the county name, but I shouldn't have to guess. --Eean 06:32, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It now has a UK topics icon :-)
Npov?
----
I've tagged this article as requiring clean up and wikification. It reads too much like a copy and paste from another article - possible plagiarism issues? I note that all the disputed text was infodumped in revision  DWaterson 00:32, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Yep. Snipped as copyvio: it comes verbatim from www.alrewasnews.com, which credits it to The History of Alrewas written in 1987 by Norman Stubbs - well in copyright. Tearlach 17:08, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Professionals Australia

message: There should've been an extra comma in the title (now added)--ZayZayEM 06:37, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The first paragraph mentions 25,000 members, but the infobox mentions 21,000. The Professionals Australia website (https://www.professionalsaustralia.org.au) claims 25,000.
Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 03:32, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Members
Talk:Imipramine

message: This paper compares impiramine, at a single dose, compared with an antidepressant peptide. www.nature (dot) com/articles/npp201461 At one dose of imipramine the rats did better on the forced swim test. The equivalent human dosage from the rats'"5.75 mg/kg" is near 420 milligrams. I am amazed that there might be a one dose to be effective antidepressant out there.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C55:7001:400:3526:88A0:5723:F775 (talk) 19:42, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  does impiramine have single dose efficacy?
Talk:Real projective space

message: could the equivalence class be written like this:
[v] = \{ \lambda v: v \epsilon R^{n+1} -{0} \and \lambda \epsilon R^* \}
:You wouldn't put the constraints on v inside the set braces, since v doesn't vary. So you'd write: "the equivalence class of v \epsilon R^{n+1}-{0} is [v] = \{ \lambda v: \lambda \epsilon R^* \}". AxelBoldt 21:22, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Equivalence class 

message: Which projective spaces are non-orientable? A5 02:11, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: RPn for n even. -- Fropuff 03:52, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orientability 

message: You cannot use homology theory to prove that real projective space is orientable for n odd. The theorem is that if a compact manifold is orientable, then its top de rham cohomology group is nonzero. By a sketchy argument of sorts, you can use the contrapositive to show that it is not orientable for n even. But, then you need de Rham's theorem, universal coefficients theorem, and the fact that Q is an injective object in the abelian category of Z-modules. I'm highly distrusting of the second proof give too. The fact is you need to consider the pushforward of the continuously oriented local frames on the sphere. The proof is not short nor is it trivial.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Agapendures (talk • contribs) 04:10, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  homology and orientability 

message: Please, try to write all the maths formulae in  LaTeX, not in bold letters.--JBecerra (talk) 12:06, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maths in LaTeX 

message: In the section Low-dimensional examples there is a nice mention of the covering map S3 → RP3, and the fact that these are Lie groups. So it seems a bit odd to omit mention of the even simpler double cover S1 → RP1. (And why not also mention the n-fold covers S1 → RP1 and their (its) Lie group status as well?)50.205.142.35 (talk) 20:12, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  It seems a bit odd to omit mention of the double cover S<sup>1</sup> → RP<sup>1</sup>
Talk:Author of Gesta Hungarorum

message: Shouldn't this article be renamed now that its scope has been expanded? Scott Moore 09:55, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Excellent! I have now cut and pasted the entire article, which can be found at History of Hungary#Sources of early Hungarian history, where I hope all future edits will be made.  Author of Gesta Hungarorum could now be deleted. --Wetman 13:42, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)