lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Boon Lay Bus Interchange

message: This statement, and similar, were deleted due to tautology: "During peak hours, the bus interchange is usually pack with people who are going to work and study."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sslevine (talk • contribs) 08:30, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:   Tautological Statements Deleted 

message: How are the number of bus services counted? For example, 174 and 174E, counted as 2 services? or 1 service? Yongjianrong (talk) 01:28, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: it would be good to have a gallery (like the one in jurong east article) showing the original interchange, temporary interchange, and the current interchange. of course we most likely would not find pictures of the original interchange -220.255.2.116 (talk) 12:56, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  gallery 

message: Could we have a new photo to replace the existing one? Currently, it shows a person being blurred out to respect his privacy, which is very weird. This is quite similar to the photo at Tiong Bahru MRT Station. 2679D (talk) 07:22, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New photo please
Talk:Bukit Batok Bus Interchange

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://publictransportsg.wordpress.com/2013/04/23/bukit-batok-bus-interchange/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Wheelandaxle293 (talk) 08:57, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Bukit Merah Bus Interchange

message: Does this meet notability? I cannot see why we need an article on every bus station in a country. Chaosdruid (talk) 14:23, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://publictransportsg.wordpress.com/2013/04/24/bukit-merah-bus-interchange/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Wheelandaxle293 (talk) 08:46, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Bukit Panjang Bus Interchange

message: *The history jump represented by this edit happened in edits which are now in User talk:Alanlim0917/Archive 1, which at the time was in User talk:Alanlim0917 and were mixed with receipt and deletion of many proposed-deletion notices and suchlike. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:26, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: *Hi  - Thanks for fixing it all but it seems most of it fails WP:NOTDIR, I know we're an encyclopedic and all that but most of it IMHO seemed unencyclopedic ?, Times of the buses/trains, what side the train doors open etc etc imho shouldn't be there, Anyway thanks again, –Davey2010Talk 00:28, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: History note
Talk:HarbourFront Bus Interchange

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://publictransportsg.wordpress.com/2013/04/27/harbourfront-bus-interchange/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Wheelandaxle293 (talk) 09:25, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Football in Australia)

message: Just chiming in to say that I am one of the legions of people that will forevermore edit the pages of football clubs and football players, from "soccer player/club" to "football player/club".
I don't really care what consensus a group of rugby league/union and Australian rules fans have come to. It's legitimately irrelevant what their biased takes are. Denying the self-determination of a sporting code in Australia by the fans of these other codes which have historically looked down on football speaks volumes.  
Football clubs are football clubs with football players. The clue is in the name of the clubs.
Have a great day, and have fun undo-ing all of my anonymous edits. I've been going strong for a decade at this point :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.193.209.60 (talk) 05:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You have a point. National media refers to the sport as Football. For example, the ABC, The Australian, Nine News etc. Local sources might use other names. Perhaps this is where some editors might get confused, thinking that their local paper sets a national tone. --Pete (talk) 16:43, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This has all been said before. Please stop wasting everyone's time. HiLo48 (talk) 01:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

text: Spending ten years making minor, inevitably reverted edits isn't the sort of thing I'd want to brag about. There is a phrase going around on the internet: "touch grass" which I think is applicable in this situation. Spinrad (talk) 01:52, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: In the four weeks since that threat was made, no further edits have been made to any Wikipedia article from that IP address. I have observed no escalation in changes from "soccer" to "football" in that time. HiLo48 (talk) 02:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  You can blame me! 

message: I have proposed a similar naming convention for football in Papua New Guinea. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Football in Papua New Guinea). This is my first time doing this so correct me if I'm wrong. Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 07:24, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed a similar thing for PNG
Talk:Rodel Naval

message: --Delia Naval Contreras (talk) 23:05, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

message: As Rodel's sister, I completely revised Rodel's page. User:Deliacontreras 14:49, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, even though you are his sister, articles here have to be sourced from websites, reference materials, etc. - 203.87.194.142 (talk) 10:53, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Delia Naval Contreras, Rodel's sister
Talk:Mustique

message: What country is this island in?  Paul Beardsell 11:08, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 

message: The story of Glenconner leaving the island to his long-serving local manservant in his will ought to be featured here, if not more of the colourful social history of this exclusive resort. 109.154.7.5 (talk) 19:13, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs updating 

message: There is some kind of British royal visit occurring on Mustique in the next few days, but all I know is what I saw on the all-news scroller on my TV set. Perhaps someone with a solid reference could amend the relevant section of the article. Coolheelz (talk) 23:40, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal Visit 

message: I spent a week on Mustique recently, if needed I can provide more pictures if there's any interest.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:980:95D1:1:E882:399F:136E:7534 (talk) 23:36, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: This entry as it stands today is way off beam. There are obvious notable names missing. Where is Mick Jagger for example?
There are a core set of names whose influence created Mustique for what it is today. In probable order, they are Colin Tennant, Oliver Messel, Princess Margaret, and Mick Jagger. Prior that the island was home to poor fishermen and goats.
There’s a case for mentioning the Queens visit as the final seal of approval for Tennants’ efforts but other ensuing Royalty visitors have to be superfluous, there are simply too many.
Outside the above even David Bowie, Kate Moss and Lord Snowden are passing faces.
There are 100 villas, belonging to the rich and famous here, and they're often rented out. The list of residential celebs (never mind) guests must be so large as to be meaningless, Bruce Willis the former, and Paul McC the latter, et all”.
If there are no objections I will amend the section to the core list.
*history-of-mustique
BeckenhamBear (talk) 13:52, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Residents and guests
Talk:Two envelopes problem/Arguments

message: If we start by saying:
For the proposed argument for switching to be valid, it is necessary that the probability that the unchosen envelope contains twice the sum in the chosen one must always be 1/2, regardless of what sum might be in the chosen envelope.   It can be shown mathematically that, if this is the case, the expected sum in both envelopes is undefined and switching is therefore pointless.
As an example, consider the case where the sum in each envelope must be a positive power of 2 (2, 4, 8, 16, 32 ...).  If there is no upper limit on the sums that might be in the envelopes, then the expected sum in both envelopes is infinite and switching is pointless.  If there is an upper limit, for example, 512, then in the case that the chosen envelope contains 512, the other envelope must contain less, so the statement that the unchosen envelope always contains twice the sum in the chosen envelope is false and the argument for switching fails.
If we allow the possible sums in the envelopes to be any power of 2 (... 1/32, 1/16, 1/8. 1/4, 1/2, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 ...) then the expectation in both envelopes is undefined and switching is again pointless.
For all possible ways of filling the envelopes, it can be shown that if the probability that unchosen envelope contains twice the sum in the chosen one is always 1/2, regardless of what sum might be in the chosen envelope, the expected sum in both envelopes is undefined.  Martin Hogbin (talk) 09:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: How about a very short general resolution first - Version 2

message: Why is it better to switch in nalebuff?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:58B:4280:1180:2914:7D36:9319:2337 (talk) 04:24, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Mary Kaye

message: There is no mention of her father, Johnny "Ukulele" Kaaihue, her trio, or any other members of her family.  More information needs to be added. SailorAlphaCentauri 16:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Family Mention
Talk:Pepe Smith

message: This information is no longer true. As of October 2009, Pepe Smith has been touring the U.S. with the Juan Dela Cruz Band and Lolita Carbon of Asin as a part of their "Himig Natin" tour. The tour is presented by Ten, EE, and Rongi Entertainment in cooperation with SEGGA Production, Inc.
I am in a group that has opened for them twice (Mon Concepcion and the Family Band), so I will gladly provide proof to vindicate this if necessary-- whether it be promotional posters or whatever.
173.55.159.76 (talk) 06:36, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Never Set Foot In The US"
Talk:Bukit Timah Nature Reserve

message: I took this sentence out of the article: "According to Dr. David Bellamy, the number of plant species in the small reserve exceeds that in all of North America."  
Firstly, it need a citation, and secondly, it is flat out wrong, given the figure of 840 species of flowering plants in Bukit Timah, versus 20,000+ in North America (see ).  Without seeing the original source for this statement, I'm not sure what exactly is wrong with it.  If I had to guess, I'd think that Bellamy's statement may have originally been something like: "more angiosperm tree species than all of North America."  I'm left wondering whether the figure of 840 species comes from Bellamy, and whether it was qualified (e.g., as "tree species", or some such).  840 species of flowering plants (all life-forms) in Bukit Timah sounds a little low to me.  840 species of angiosperm trees seems a little high, but not impossible.
63.78.97.2 (talk) 21:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Roman gentes

message: Please add an explanation to the header. There is no article at gente. Piccadilly 11:17, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - it's the plural of gens not of gente.  User|Neddyseagoon 15:15, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there a list about that? Böri (talk) 11:04, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Caecina, Cilnia, Caesennia, Licinia, Lucretia, Herminia, Lartia, Popilii, Tarquinii, Manlii, Postumii, Menenii, Veturii, Verginii, Aequlii, Aternii, Romilii, Tarquitii, Canuleii, Laetorii, Maecilii, Aebutii, Aburii, Campatii, Egnatii, Nigidii, Fulcinii, Saenii, Ancharii, Martii, Arminii, Petronii, Vibii, Afinii, Betui, Volcacii, Seii, Vicirii, Salvii what else? Böri (talk) 11:51, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which of them "Etruscan" ? 

message: Claudia (gens), Aemilia (gens), Veturia (gens), Sertoria (gens), Curtius (gens), Titia (gens) ?,
Valerius, Pompilia (gens), Pomponia (gens), Calpurnia (gens), Maria (gens) ?, Lollia (gens) ?, Fabia (gens) ? Böri (talk) 11:57, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sabine gentes 

message: Since :Category:Roman gentes is a subcategory of :Category:Ancient Roman families and :Category:Prosopography of Ancient Rome, individual articles on the gentes don't need to be in these latter two categories. But categorization within :Category:Roman gentes might be backwards. For example: :Category:Aemilii, containing individuals of the gens, should be a subcategory of :Category:Aemilia (gens) (or whatever we should call such a category: see discussion here). Or not. Just trying to sort this out. Cynwolfe (talk) 15:48, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  subcategorization
Talk:Biograph Theater

message: The F.B.I. named the theater in Hogan's Alley after the Biograph. It is part of a simulated town used for trianing at the academy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.234.190.52 (talk) 21:05, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hogan's Alley 

message: I notice that the term "Biograph" was closely associated with the Biograph Company and its Biograph Studios, and that the theater was designed and constructed while these were active. Was the theater originally named after the Biograph Company? Was it originally owned by the Biograph Company? —BarrelProof (talk) 21:19, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name and original ownership
Talk:Buona Vista Bus Terminal

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://publictransportsg.wordpress.com/2013/04/30/buona-vista-bus-terminal/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Wheelandaxle293 (talk) 09:10, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:List of Finnish modern frigates

message: The Hybrid: This is certainly not humbug. Those are the three modern frigates that have served with the Finnish navy, see "Uusimaa", "Hämeenmaa" and "Matti Kurki" here . The Matti Kurki has its own entry here.
If we go back to the 19th century, there were an additional 5 frigates that served with the "Finska havsekipaget":
Type         	Name      	Time
Frigate      	Jekaterina	1831-
Frigate      	Bellona   	1831-
Frigate      	Melpomene 	1842-
Steam frigate	Kaleva    	1859
Steam frigate	Olof      	1853-1856
--MoRsE 11:23, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I apologize. I thought that frigate was a word someone had just made up. I'll be more careful in the future. Cheers, -- THLCCD 11:52, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, good that we worked it out :) --MoRsE 11:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yishun Bus Interchange

message: I've removed it. Wikipedia isn't an advertisement or guide website.
LordThrall (talk) 08:54, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the "SMRT Thematic Guide" and "Bus Services Guide" 
Talk:Toa Payoh Bus Interchange

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://publictransportsg.wordpress.com/2013/04/30/toa-payoh-bus-interchange/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Wheelandaxle293 (talk) 08:43, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Serangoon Bus Interchange

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://publictransportsg.wordpress.com/2013/04/30/serangoon-bus-interchange/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Wheelandaxle293 (talk) 09:06, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed