lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1995/96 United States network television schedule

message: Merge supported.  Same comments as at Talk:1994-95 United States network television schedule.  — EncMstr 03:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 
Talk:1996–97 United States network television schedule

message: Merge supported.  Same comments as at Talk:1994-95 United States network television schedule.  — EncMstr 03:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: TOP 20 SERIES [1996-1997 TV SEASON]
 1. "ER"                     NBC  30.79 million viewers
 2. "Seinfeld"               NBC  30.56 
 3. "Friends"                NBC  24.88 
 4. "Suddenly Susan"         NBC  24.61 
 5. "The Naked Truth"        NBC  24.48 
 6. "Fired Up"               NBC  23.48 
 7. "Monday Night Football"  ABC  22.38 
 8. "Home Improvement"       ABC  21.68 
 9. "The Single Guy"         NBC  20.89 
10. "Touched By An Angel"    CBS  20.25 
11. "60 Minutes"             CBS  18.84 
12. "20/20"                  ABC  18.31 
13. "The X-Files"            FOX  17.87 
14. "NBC Sunday Night Movie" NBC  17.54 
15. "CBS Sunday Movie"       CBS  17.49 
16. "NYPD Blue"              ABC  17.43 
17. "Spin City"              ABC  17.33 
18. "The Drew Carey Show"    ABC  17.03 
19. "3rd Rock From the Sun"  NBC  17.01 
20. "Walker, Texas Ranger"   CBS  16.98
 1.  NBC     15.2 million viewers (primetime average)   
 2.  CBS     13.8     
 3.  ABC     13.5     
 4.  FOX     11.6  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.19.253.7 (talk) 16:44, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ratings: top 20
Talk:Human rights in Muslim-majority countries

message: the US is irrelevant to this article, at least in its present form. Xtra 06:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: US

message: What is the point of this article? At most, it can be a disambig page. There is no content in this article, that can't be covered in any of the other articles. Infact, I see no content  in this article that justifies its existence.Bless sins (talk) 01:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It exists in order to satisfy the biggots who want any rant to bash Islam.173.74.22.141 (talk) 04:35, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Point?

message: I don't understand why this article exists. We don't have Human rights in Christian countries or Human rights in Hindu countries, do we? While Human rights in Islam is a valid article, this isn't.VR talk 06:20, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You are presuming that Western and Christian are mutually exclusive of others but identical to each other.  That is wrong.  First, the modern concept of human rights did formally originate in the west but despite of Christianity and not because of it.  After centuries of wars based on religious dogma and racial and national tensions between and within its states, the west figured it had to end that state of war between its savage populations by making such basic rules and try to adhere to them.  Other nations did not have the savage history as Europe did and did not need the same declarations.  Further, as colonialism and other western atrocities attest to, the west did not regard other peoples and nations as having the same rights, and most westerners, either leaders or lay people, still don't.  Even internally, most western countries have problems applying these rule faithfully and equally among their citizens, not to mention extending them to foreigners living among them.  And second, you are wrong in your assumption because most Christians around the world are not westerners, but rather third worlders and live in countries with the worst records of human rights violations.173.74.22.141 (talk) 04:31, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't understand 

message: — Assignment last updated by Kaltham alsayed (talk) 13:54, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: MIT 398 Intercultural International Communication

message: Hello, I noticed that Qatar wasn't included in this article even though there were other countries part of the gulf region included. My suggestion is adding Qatar as there are many public information on their human rights laws. This would also open up the ability to compare the differences between Qatar and their neighbouring countries. Kaltham alsayed (talk) 18:33, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Qatar section
Talk:Bob and Tom Radio: The Comedy Tour

message: This should be left since it is needed to clarify upfront what the article is about and to meet WP:MOS. BlueValour 04:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I understand. Lmcelhiney 14:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead sentence 

message: The sources tag must not be removed until the statements in the article are sourced. BlueValour 04:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Citations added and tag removed. Lmcelhiney 14:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good, thank you. BlueValour 18:48, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Butterfield Overland Despatch

message: As made clear in the text linked here, as well as all other texts I have seen, the proper name is Butterfield Overland Despatch.  I intend to correct this in a couple of days, but I first wanted to see if anyone had a good reason for using the name "Dispatch" here. Kgwo1972 04:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed. Kgwo1972 19:43, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispatch v. Despatch
Talk:Theodore Dwight Weld

message: The article needs an image. I understand from this webpage at House Divided that an etching of Weld was published in 1885, so it is public domain. I have not yet seen the published image myself in a Google Books scan. There is also a photograph which is obviously the model for the etching: this image from Connecticut Freedom Trail, offered by the Theodore Dwight Weld House. One of these should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Binksternet (talk) 21:38, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph or etching 
Talk:1000 Piazzia

message: The links/references provided can not be the sole sources if information in this article, I am adding   Jeepday 04:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This has been tagged for notabiltiy, so opening discussion. Like all asteroids under 2000, needs discussion before redirecting/keeping as is. Pinging tagger  and creator . If found non-notable, redirection to List of minor planets: 1–1000 would be the best option. Boleyn (talk) 18:01, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Unlike the case with 501 Urhixidur, this asteroid is a smaller main-belt asteroid that appears to lack enough data to make it notable. I would support a redirect unless more data can be found to prove its notability. Carbon6 21:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

text: This asteroid, as with most, rates as a Low importance object and should be kept. This is not some provisionally named minor body with few observations. --mikeu talk 21:26, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Mu301, without something unique or special to say about Piazzia, it is going to be hard to make a fairly common main-belt asteroid that is less than 50km in diameter very notable by Wikipedia standards. Piazzia does not even get brighter than apparent magnitude 14.0. I once proposed making all MBAs greater than 50km in diameter notable by definition, but after the asteroid wars of 2015, I would say such a rule could/should only apply to MBAs greater than 70km in diameter. -- Kheider (talk) 19:53, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: While size matters, especially for minor planets, there are other considerations to be taken into account as well. I think the revised the stub about the asteroid named in honour of Giuseppe Piazzi should no longer be considered for deletion, i.e. redirection to the List of minor planets#Main Index. In general, whenever you create a #REDIRECT, please remember to to fully implement its categories, defaultsort, section-anchor and cat-sortkeys, accordingly, and to remove the link on the mentioned list, as you would create a WP:SELFREDIRECT otherwise. Thx, Rfassbind – talk  22:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Template talk:New Jersey Devils

message: See Template talk:DevilsCoach for a combined discussion. — MrDolomite • Talk 14:42, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Listing of Coaches

message: We need an important figures section....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.36.80.161 (talk) 19:25, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Figures
Talk:No. 1 Squadron RAF

message: Why has this page got a category of Robin Olds - what's the link?  Nigel Ish 20:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robin Olds? 

message: Added in the third command of Sqn Leader Baker in October 1969, no exact date so have left blank 188.220.171.33 (talk) 19:48, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent amendments (oct 2010) 

message: Seems to me the article is well-cited these days so I'm removing the warning at the top of the article. 86.156.89.142 (talk) 22:51, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Talk:Distinguished Flying Cross (United Kingdom)

message: I read "Honorary awards were made on 964 occasions to aircrew from other non-commonwealth countries."
But are these awards "honorary"? It is not an Order of Knighthood and I can't find this provision in either the literature or in the Royal Warrant.
Sincerely yours,
Robert Prummel 01:12, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doubt 

message: This article twice makes mention of the DFC being a 'third level' award or decoration without any explanation of what that means.
130.246.148.53 (talk) 15:05, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third level?
Talk:V The Final Battle

message: I've completed the episodes section. Eaglestorm (talk) 14:41, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  episodes 

message: There were four or five girls in the role of Elizabeth. The infant, the 2 year old, the one who did the venom spitting, and Jenny Beck. So who were the other three or four? I just watched the three VHS tapes, might've been another one between the infant and the 2 year old.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bizzybody (talk • contribs) 08:54, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Who else played Elizabeth?

message: Should this page reside where it currently is, or at V: The Final Battle? there is a hatnote pointing to technical restrictions, but i'm unaware of anything that currently limits us from moving the page to one wiht a colon in it. -TinGrin 17:48, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is not the colon, but the "V:". V: The Final Battle goes to a different part of Wikimedia, hence the hatnote. - BilCat (talk) 17:59, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Aah, completely missed that. thanks! -TinGrin 19:10, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper name 

message: This article needs a character list to define each character's relationship to one another as as well as their side in the battle. The plot is really confusing if you don't know who each character is, or was in the prior episodes. :( The Red Queen (talk) 16:05, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely -- there is nothing to explain who any of these people are.  It's difficult to even figure out which are the "good guys" and which are the "bad guys"....  71.235.184.247 (talk) 23:59, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character List 

message: "V: The Final Battle was played out over three episodes, set several months after the events of the original miniseries".
This content is totally wrong.
Final battle is set months before v series. HardeeHar (talk) 08:21, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you misread it. The sentence is correct. The "original miniseries" refers to V (1983 miniseries), not V (1984 TV series). Zzyzx11 (talk) 01:36, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content wrong
Talk:National Portrait Gallery (United States)

message: There is currently a rather long debate on Talk: National Portrait Gallery (London) regarding what the correct name of that page should be, with the choices basically boiling down to National Portrait Gallery (United Kingdom) (where the page sat until recently) or National Portrait Gallery (London) (where it has now been moved). One possible corrollary of this might be to rename this page (and National Portrait Gallery (Australia)) to prevent confusion and aid consistency. I note that this page was moved here in the past from NPG Washington DC (which is now a redirect). Any clarifications or additions to the debate would be most welcome. Badgerpatrol 04:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Name

message: The section on the controversy was extremely poor. It went in to great detail on how some people have compared it it other infamous acts of censorship and how people have stopped supporting NPG or protested it but the only thing it actually told us about the controversy was that William Anthony Donohue said it was anti-catholic and the author said it wasn't anti-religion or sacrilegious (and it was part of a video which was part of a wider exhibit). It didn't actually tell us at all what was controversial. I've since added a section from the WAD article which clarifies a scene containing a crucifix covered with ants appears to have been what was controversial. If there is more, it would be helpful to add since it's a bit silly to talk about how controversial something is without explaining what was actually controversial. (To be fair, I understand how when someone is intimately familiar with a controversy or whatever they can not notice they are leaving out vital details which leave a reader scratching their head having read lots of not so important stuff.) Nil Einne (talk) 19:25, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  A fire in my belly
Talk:National Portrait Gallery (Australia)

message: There is currently a rather long debate on Talk: National Portrait Gallery (London) regarding what the correct name of that page should be, with the choices basically boiling down to National Portrait Gallery (United Kingdom) (where the page sat until recently) or National Portrait Gallery (London) (where it has now been moved). One possible corrollary of this might be to rename this page (and National Portrait Gallery (United States)) to prevent confusion and aid consistency. Any clarifications or additions to the debate would be most welcome. Badgerpatrol 04:39, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Name

message: * What I think should be changed (include citations): Additional paragraphs to acknowledge all previous Directors under Governance: for example:
* Why it should be changed:
At present only the most recent Director is listed under governance.
PortraitGallery (talk) 04:58, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but due to copyright reasons, we can't host copyright material copied from the organization's website. Regardless of the copyright issue, mini-biographies of directors and former directors is not an appropriate addition. — Diannaa (talk) 13:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

text: Fixed. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:32, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of Interest edit request
Talk:Ray & Joan Kroc Corps Community Centers

message: Below is a table that I would like to take the place of the “Other Kroc Centers” section of this Wiki.  If you have any information about any of these Kroc Centers please feel free to add information to the table or add comments about possible columns or current columns. If necessary please place your references at the bottom of this discussion (i.e. you got information off the web, please post the whole web address) and the date on which you retrieved the information.--Psjoding 02:40, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion of 2 December 2006

message: I have reverted to the version of 07:13, 24 January 2010‎ by RevelationDirec to clear out the introduction of copyrighted material.
The current version of http://www.salvationarmyusa.org/usn/kroc-centers is one of several web sites which contains useful information that can be used to bring the article up to date.
Due to conflict of interest issues (some editors consider WP:COI includes both actual and perceived conflicts of interest), I will not be making "edits of substance" to this article unless the impact is trivial or the edit is necessary to enforce Wikiipedia policies or guidelines.  Removing copyright violations qualifies.  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 14:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, it looks like I didn't get it all, see http://kroccenter.org/about-us , http://web.archive.org/web/20100127021049/http://kroccenter.org/about-us , https://web.archive.org/web/20061012014953/http://www.salvationarmyusa.org/usn/www_usn.nsf/vw-news/7F7BDC130839D79C80257196006B355E?opendocument , and the section immediately below this one.  Disclaimer:  See section immediately below this one for disclaimer. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:44, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyrighted material removed 

message: The 2006 reference http://www.salvationarmyusa.org/usn%5Cwww_usn.nsf/vw-news/7F7BDC130839D79C80257196006B355E?opendocument (dead link) may be the same content as this one.  Care should be taken to avoid copyright violations. Disclaimer:  While this is not a "paid edit" I have received compensation from "The Salvation Army" for other work, and I do have a clear WP:Conflict of interest when it comes to this topic.  Other than policy-enforcement and non-substantial edits, I plan on not directly editing this article.  Reverting to a copyvio-free edit (or one that I believed to be copyvio-free) is a form of policy enforcement. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:42, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible old source URL 

message: These edits of December 24, 2007 appear to have introduced most or all of the copyrighted material that still remains on the page.  Restoring to this version of November 27, 2007 should solve the problem.  Disclaimer:  See disclaimer above. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:45, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible date current copyvio's were introduced
Talk:Changoleón

message: Hello, I came across Changoleon's article and decided to clean it up, yet, I think there's still a lot of work to do, particularly concerning his biography. First of all, I have a controversy regarding his real name, for I have found references calling him either Samuel González Quiroz, Samuel Ruiz, and Samuel Pérez Reyes. I decided to leave the González one, for 'tis the one I came across the most. Also, some say he appeared in another TV show called El Calabozo prior to Toma Libre, but I found no references documenting it. One more thing, there's a very incomplete Samuel Gonzalez Quiroz article besides this one, which I think should be deleted or merged with this one. Help me, Wiki-wan-Kenobis, you are my only hope. eJ 04:40, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Content

message: I saw Changoleon in Plaza Hidalgo of Coyoacán on Saturday, July 28th, 2007.  His clothes were clean and he did not appear to be inebriated.  He posed for a few photos with my wife.  Not home 22:23, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent Sighting
Talk:Arbutus

message: What would the magickal uses be for arbutus?
 would also like the igredients for things like stomach aches, etc.
-starlet_moon_child — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starlet moon child (talk • contribs) 04:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the fruit can easily to have etilic alcohol. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.97.181.220 (talk) 17:29, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  drunken 

message: According to Enc.Britannica, Arbutus is a "genus of about 14 species of broad-leaved evergreen shrubs or trees." So it is evergreen, it seems, but the Wikipedia article claims it's not. Can someone figure this out?
:It has leaves all year round.  It's evergreen.  Individual leaves fall off - as also happens with other evergreen trees, like pines and firs - but it always keeps some leaves and never sheds them all at the same time like a birch or alder. 67.158.66.240 (talk) 20:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  evergreen or not? 

message: The following text is removed from the page pending cleanup to encyclopedic style:
"Victor Reiter & his son V.R.,Jr. purchased their madrone from Captain Abraham of the Golden Gate Nursery located in what eventually became known as the marina District. The Reiters eventually lost the label so     ,of course, the tree throve. When I first encountered it to relive it of extraneous endweight and dying density, the tree was about 45 ft tall and 45-50 ft wide. For years Victor tried to get the commercial nurseries to propagate it. Finally they did, and its popularity took off. The name 'Marina' was a "working" name to be used until someone came forth to give the correct one.That has not yet happened. Meanwhile the Reiter specimen died a few years ago from an Armillaria fungal attack. It was about 18 inches in diameter. DNA analysis would most likely reveal  the mix of parent species. How old this clone is, we do not yet know. Neither do we yet know the actual life expectancy" Nadiatalent (talk) 11:54, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultivar 'Marina' 

message: To add to this article:  the etymology of this genus name in Latin. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 21:42, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article
Talk:Miss Russian Army

message: The article seems not to have been updated since 2005. NotYourFathersOldsmobile (talk) 03:55, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs to be updated
Talk:Zinc peroxide

message: "It's a chemical compound" isn't a good enough reason to have an encyclopedia article. 2,5,11-trichloroicosane is a chemical compound too, but it definitely doesn't deserve its own article, because there's nothing distinguishing it from many other chloroalkanes. Zinc peroxide probably does deserve an article, but right now there's nothing to show that. What is it used for? What are its interesting properties? Why does anyone care about it? —Keenan Pepper 05:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance
Talk:Krasnaya Zvezda

message: If. The editorial office of the newspaper will make an online contact form. 
:This will add to the credibility of the newspaper, newspapermen, and their sponsors. Of course! Available. spam , and supper - spam .
:( But, from gogo? )
:Maybe you will be allowed? Enlarge, deepen, expand. Contacts with readers.
///////// vers  russ.:////////////////
Если.
: редакция газеты сделает online - контакт формуляр. Это прибавит к авторитету газеты,   газетчиков,  и, их спонсоров .  Конечьно же ! Возможен.   spam  , и,  суппер - spam . Но, от  гого ? Может быть   , Вам разрешат ? Увеличить , углубить , расширить . Контакты с читателями .
Egeymi 2 (talk) 13:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  If.
File talk:Some of the countryside surrounding Des Lacs.jpg

message: I have talked with Anna Heppler (actually, she is a good friend and neighbor!), and she has allowed me to use this image in Wikipedia, and has allowed its use per GDFL (I think that's the term)...
In any case, this image IS supposed to be authorized for use, but I (as a newbie) put the wrong tag on it and now I can't figure out how to change it....
Please help and Sorry!!!!
NDCompuGeek 05:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it possible for you to put up a version of this picture that is not overwritten? --AlexWCovington (talk) 17:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  changing tags