Talk:Maryse Mizanin

message: This article lists Maryse as a retired professional wrestler. I'd like to correct that, Maryse is still competing on the indie scene and is NOT retired just because she was let go from WWE doesn't mean she just retired.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.138.182 (talk) 03:07, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect details

message: Should we allow Maryse winning the Divas Title to be mentioned on here before it airs on Friday night? Steveweiser (talk) 18:03, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Divas Title

message: "On March 2, 2009 edition of RAW, Maryse appeared as a special guest commentator, and then ended up with a suprise attack on the Women's Champion Melina." Everybody except "NiciVampireHeart" answer please. Josephjames21 (talk) 16:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Excuse me, but I'm entitled to give my opinion. it's not notable. One appearance means nothing. If a feud develops then and only then does it become notable. Other than that it's just week-by-week. And don't try and tell me that a feud is going to happen. As I've explained to you on your talk page, that is just speculation and crytsal balling on your part. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 16:22, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Excuse me, but you already gave your opinion. I don't need to know it again, If you want to give it to other people that's okay, but I don't need to know it. You took it out of contex. Josephjames21 (talk) 16:32, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I was giving it to other people, i.e. the other people who will be commenting in this discussion as I already told you on your talk page. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 16:49, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay since she gave her opinion, I'm going to have to give mine. Mine is I think it's notable because Maryse appeared on a different brand as a different role and she attacked a notable person, and most likely a feud will come of it because that is how WWE works. Besides, I didn't express in the article that a feud would come of it, that is just my opinion, and technically it's not a week-by-week event because Maryse didn't appear on any brand previous to Yesterday's RAW. Josephjames21 (talk) 17:08, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

text: If you know "how the WWE works" then you should know that how the WWE works is that they through a bunch of strands out there for the Divas and then haphazardly decide which to pursue. It's a bit like pebble dashing. Likely this will lead to something but there's a chance it won't so at the moment it's, in effect, an incomplete sentence. Tony2Times (talk) 18:53, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

text: It's not notable right now. WWE ignores the brand split whenever they want too, so that's not a big deal. We also can't speculate it will lead to a feud (which even if it did wouldn't mean it goes in the article). Also, you can't tell certain people not to answer as they only makes you look bad and you can't stop them from commenting. TJ Spyke 19:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Its not notable because it does not add anything to her career or enhance it in anyway.--₮RUCӨ 21:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this notable?

message: Keep the part where it says that Maryse is the first French Canadian Diva to win the Divas Championship!Team French TKO (talk) 15:37, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Isnt this obvious though Maryse is FRENCH ok. I know michelle mcCool isnt from canada so it should be put in the article.Team French TKO II (talk) 21:01, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not notable anyways. TJ Spyke 21:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: (edit conflict) She is the second person to hold the championship, so she is the "first" of a lot of things to hold it....first French Canadian, first non-American, first person under 5'9", first person with blonde hair (um, nevermind). It isn't important in the slightest. Nikki♥311  21:06, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First French Canadian 

message: I read on link title that maryse was seen by Dr. James Andrews, and that she may have a serious knee injury.  is it ok to put that in the article, or stay safe and see where the story goes? Here is the link for the story: http://nodq.com/wwe/250750828.shtml  --JereMerr 03:00, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: nodq.com is not a reliable source, so we leave it out until a reliable one comes along.. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 12:02, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Knee Injury 

message: According to her twitter account, Maryse will soon have an official website. Not adding it to the wiki article yet, just thought this should be brought up to attention. --FaithLehaneTheVampireSlayer 02:35, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official Website? 

message: On Maryse's twitter, *  ,
she clearly states that she does indeed reside in Los Angeles, CA,
and not Miami, FL, as the (outdated) WOW reference had listed.
: Hmm. I wonder if http://www.facebook.com/besexymaryseouellet#!/besexymaryseouellet?sk=info could be used as a reference? That's Maryse's own account... Starship.paint (talk) 14:03, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a source from her official blog Starship.paint (talk) 14:10, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maryse's residence 

message: The opening line states one date - the info box states another.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.13.192.46 (talk) 00:51, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: There are two different Date's of Birth in the article

message: Possible return to a WWE diva name Maryse Ouellet She confirmed that she has a possible return to the WWE rumors were added. Maryse says she will return some Year, and she will act again in the WWE. Bryanmartinez1234 (talk) 20:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: "Possible" is speculation. It is also possible she will join TNA or possible she will never wrestle again. We don't add speculation to articles. If she returns to WWE, it will be documented then after she returns; not before. NiciVampireHeart 15:53, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  A possible return to a WWE former Diva Maryse Ouellet 

message: Maiden name also needs an IPA. Would be that "Oo-yay" or something? Mac Dreamstate (talk) 23:30, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: Is it necessary to mention the subject's daughters' names? They are only notable for being Ouellet's daughters and as per WP:BLPNAME, for a single event (being born) although being sourced properly. , what do you think? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:23, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Usually I would say not name them, but since the children are a part of a reality show where their names are public, maybe listing them would be okay. StaticVapor message me! 19:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , Didn't know they were part of a reality show. That makes their names "widely known". It is OK to keep their names then. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:53, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daughters' names necessary? 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:21, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Maryse Ouellet's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "FWEwomens":
From Maria Kanellis: 
From Zelina Vega: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Maryse Ouellet]] 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jack Frost (talk) 07:51, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Maryse Ouellet →  – Ouellet was her née and Mizanin is her legal/real name; e.g. see info about her company. She uses Maryse Mizanin as her identity on all of her social media accounts. IMDb uses Maryse Mizanin. Sources use Maryse Mizanin too; e.g. . Any specific reason to keep her birth name? Even her WWE name Maryse is much much more well-known than her née. Wario-Man talk 09:48, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. And Maryse (wrestler) looks fine too but her current WWE/wrestling career is not as notable as her other works in my opinion; e.g. Miz & Mrs. vs. her sporadic WWE appearances since 2016. Wario-Man talk 13:10, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: If she appears as Maryse Mizanin, no problem. Miz and Mrs has strong numbers. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:20, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 July 2021