Talk:Baháʼí Faith and auxiliary language

message: Just curious for those who know better than I - have there ever been any statements in the religion on the language Interlingua?
211.240.138.196 12:02, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

message: I'm not sure what the opening sentence: "Two related hermeneutic difficulties have led some commentators to conclude that two international languages will be chosen — not simultaneously, but one for the near future and one for the far future." is trying to get at. I've never heard of this so-called conflict.
"Some commentators" is troubling. What commentators? Without citation, and there's none here, these are weasly.
What hermeneutic/exegetic difficulties? It's already established in the article that Bahá'u'lláh was only praising Arabic and 'Abdul-Bahá prasing Esperanto. The points aren't related, so how could they conflict?
I'm loathe to see references to a so-called Bahá'í hermeneutics. Biblical hermeneutics has a checkered history to say the least. And Bahá'ís have a treasure-trove or authoritative, to us, interpretation in 'Abdul-Bahá and Shoghi Effendi.
Exegetic studies of the Bahá'í writings are useful, but I don't see a conflict requiring such a study. Besides that study should be documented here at least on the "Talk" page.
This section makes very good points on the process of adopting a universal auxiliary language. I especially like the references to minority languages and cultures.
Could this section be reworked as so:
Toward a universal language
The idea that a universal language would displace native languages is potentially troubling. This would seem to contradict the Bahá'í Faith's principle of "unity in diversity."
Language is strongly attached to culture. The prospect of all-but-universal language extinction would be undesirable to less dominant languages and cultures, like Uyghur or Cornish, which are struggling for distinction. American Indian languages and cultures were suppressed in boarding schools in the United States and Canada much to the detriment of these peoples. The effects of the suppression of Irish can still be felt today.
To the world's ethnic minorities an imposed language would be tantamount to an imposed culture. The Bahá'í writings appear to envision a language that is willingly supported and learned.
This passage from Shoghi Effendi refers the voluntary, or de-facto, adoption of a single language to the distant future:
:What Bahá'u'lláh is referring to in the Eighth Leaf of the Exalted Paradise [Tablets of Bahá'u'lláh, p. 68] is a far distant time, when the world is really one country, and one language would be a sensible possibility. It does not contradict His instruction as to the need immediately for an auxiliary language.
::From a letter written on behalf of Shoghi Effendi to an individual believer, March 16, 1946
::republished in Lights of Guidance, p. 340
Another possible interpretation is to say that "reduced to one" refers not to all languages, but only to the languages which would be necessary to learn. This preserves the idea of "unity in diversity."
MARussellPESE 19:29, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Two International Languages section

message: "Unitas Multiplex" was introduced because it is the original latin term for "unity in multiplicity", which is analogous to unity in diversity. It is a fundamental tennt of the enlightenment philosophy of Leibniz, specifically his project to develop an auxiliary language known as the characteristica universalis. There have been many different developments of this approach in contemporary philosophy and science. An interesting application is in the work of Systems Ecology, ecological economics & ecological engineering. Sholto Maud 23:19, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Firstly, this is the english wikipedia.  Secondly the article is about the Baha'i idea of language policy which includes among it keeping the diversity of language, and comes from the writings of Baha'u'llah.  Thirdly, characteristica universalis is already in the "see also" section. -- Jeff3000 04:47, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No it's not offensive, and I find it interesting that the idea has existed for so long, but it's place is not in this article, because this article is about what the Baha'i Faith teaches about language policy, not what others think about it.  -- Jeff3000 13:42, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unitas Multiplex

message: Are there any objections to moving this page to Universal Auxiliary Language. It currently redirects here, and Bahá'í Faith and language policy sounds funny. There really isn't a "language policy" in the Baha'i Faith. Cuñado  - Talk 10:15, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never liked this title anyway, but "Universal Auxiliary Language" is perhaps too generic. How about Baha'i Faith and auxiliary language? MARussellPESE 12:53, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I like "Baha'i Faith and auxiliary language".  Note that there is already an article called International Auxiliary Language that has nothing to do with the Baha'i Faith. -- Jeff3000 13:50, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  name change 

message: Should this be under Wikiproject Conlanging?
I can do stuff!  (talk) 06:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject:Conlanging