lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Just Say Ozzy

message: Ozzy played the Tower Theater in Philadelphia in 1989, not the Spectrum.  It was broadcast as a live pay per view on June 4, 1989.  And the crowds sound nothing alike between that show an Just Say Ozzy. 209.254.200.110 (talk) 22:02, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philadelphia 1989 
Talk:Venus and Adonis (Shakespeare poem)

message: I note the naming convention used for other Shakespeare articles would suggest this article be named Venus and Adonis (Shakespeare) instead of Venus and Adonis (Shakespeare poem). Thoughts? Objections? --Xover (talk) 18:31, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move? 

message: In Shakespeare_authorship_question it is said that the Shakespeare's 'Venus and Adonis' draws heavily on Giambattista Marino' Adone. In this article the connection is not mentioned at all. Dart evader (talk) 19:39, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Giambattista Marino connection 
Talk:List of stable isotopes

message: Tellurium-128 is listed as an unstable isotope, with a half life of 2.2e24 years - is this enough to remove it from this list? Or perhaps create a section/article of "pretty stable" isotopes?
Robert 16:20, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Some states don't come in degrees: You are either pregnant or not. An isotope is either stable or radioactive.
There are a lot of isotopes in this list, which ARE radioactive (V-50, Ge-76, Cd-113, Cd-116, In-115, Mo-100, Gd-152, W-180, Re-187 etc...), but there are not some isotopes that were NOT observed to be radioactive (for instance, W-182, 183, 184, 186). I think it would be more useful to make a list of naturally occurred isotopes, and as a sub-set of it -- a list of stable isotopes. V1adis1av 14:15, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Has it been done? If not I think we should outsource the article to an expert in isotopes and in English. Jclerman 18:28, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pretty pregnant ?

message: What do you mean by slightly radioactive? 
Low level of radioactivity? 
Long half-life? 
Jclerman 18:19, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Slightly pregnant ?

message: How can you find an element in an isotope ? Jclerman 18:27, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: All elements .., are only found in radioactive isotopes

message: If Tungsten-182 
Tungsten-183 
Tungsten-184 
Tungsten-186 
are stable, edit the beginning statement. If they are not, delete. Be consistent, please. Perhaps outource this article to an expert? Jclerman 18:42, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They should be alpha active but their decays had never been observed. It is only a theoretical prediction (and their predicted half-life is very-very-very long, 1050 yr or so). But for the fifth naturally occurring tungsten isotope (180W), this prediction was recently checked and its alpha decay had been observed (1018 yr, in a good agreement with theory). Many naturally occurring isotopes are considered as stable but really they are not (~65 ones should be double beta active, ~80 should be alpha active etc.). So, there are no strict border between radioactive isotopes and stable ones. And if proton is not stable (as Grand Unification Theories predict), all the isotopes are radioactive. I was in the group that had discovered the radioactivity of 180W so perhaps I can consider myself an expert in this field. --V1adis1av 20:54, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fascinating and illuminating. Thank you. Walter Siegmund (talk) 18:54, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Are they or not ?
Talk:Rave music

message: In an effort to improve the article, I have added fact tags to the page, please help by finding information on all citations that are needed. --Cooljuno411 (talk) 18:50, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  fact tags 

message: EBM is missing--188.101.79.45 (talk) 11:15, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  EBM 

message: Some great references on this page, mates. Gravitoweak (talk) 23:19, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: It can be added to rave genres ? 82.139.5.13 (talk) 14:08, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about new rave ??? 

message: Would anyone mind if I removed the artists from the list of genres?  I don't believe they are particular relevant to the rave scene.  It suggests these artists might perform at raves. If any act is heavily associated with raves, then that should be mentioned with a reference for support. Nor does there seem to be any criteria for their listing.  Major artists are usually mentioned on genre articles for those seeking this information. - Shiftchange (talk) 21:07, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artist removal? 

message: Although I understand the implication of of the re-direct, there is a lot of sourced material in this article. Re-directing it and massively moving around applying that there is no genre (A term used even within Simon Reynolds book Energy Flash: A Journey Through Rave Music and Dance Culture is pretty inappropriate I think. So before re-directing everything again, lets discuss it. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:37, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Centralized discussion at Talk:Rave/Archive 2#Proposed merge from rave music to rave. Please voice your thoughts there. Binksternet (talk) 15:32, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Rave 'genre'
Talk:Richard Thompson (musician)

message: This article doesn't adhere to the policy of a neutral point of view. Rather, it expends considerable effort to put Thompson in a favorable light. Too often, it sounds like it was written by an admirer. That is appropriate in a fan magazine or a music critic's article, but it's out of place in a reference work like Wikipedia. Here are some examples:
# "the brilliant acoustic guitar ballad "1952 Vincent Black Lightning"" - brilliant is a value judgment, 
# Thompson was "without a recording contract (but not without admirers)" - the parenthetical phrase 
# "Thompsons' fans often refer to the Shoot Out the Lights tour (not unfondly) as "The Tour from Hell" "- the parenthetical
# "For a short while a late career commercial breakthrough seemed likely....the momentum that could have capitalized on the critical success and popularity enjoyed by Rumor and Sigh never followed."  - this is a hypothetical, suggesting that somebody else screwed up his career. Perhaps, but let's stick to the facts!
# "Thompson's unique take on the Britney Spears hit "Oops!... I Did It Again"" - "unique" is a value judgment, an opinion.
# "Thompson has been well served by compilers of retrospective collections...essential purchases for more committed fans" - "well served" is an opinion and "essential" is promotional
# "Watching the Dark is a generous combination of his better-known songs" - "generous" is not objective
I made these points on this talk page some time ago. Nobody objected. So I'm going to make these changes. Peace and love to all!
BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 12:11, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too Affectionate. Make it More Objective. 

message: Is this video copyright compliant: ? Michael Jerome on drums and Taras Prodaniuk on bass/vocals (also Bobby Eichorn on guitar, some tracks). Here's the setlist. The concert footage seems to be available commercially on DVD in the US, so maybe the YT video is not available there. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:32, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard Thompson Electric Trio at Shrewsbury Folk Festival 2018 

message: Is there any good source for a middle name of "John"? His FreeBMD entry here supports this. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle name
Talk:List of electronic music record labels

message: Please read the following pages WP:NOT#LINK and WP:EL before adding external links to this list.  If the label is indeed noteable, then the link would sit on the label's own article page and not here. Lugnuts 09:41, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All red links have been removed.  Some have been there for months or are constantly deleted via AFD.  Please feel free to add labels that aren't here already, provided they can meet WP:CORP. Lugnuts 13:54, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  notability is a subjective determination and should be remove as critera for inclusion to this list until such time that Notable has been adequately defined. Zenasprime (talk) 00:12, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Note to article editors
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Motorized bicycle history/Summary of discussion

message: (The irony behind having a list to summarize the votes is not to "prove a point"; apparently, it is easier to read, easier to write without a POV, and in this case probably the best ways to go.) --72.57.8.215 16:47, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: List/Summary of Nominations/Votes
Template talk:Copy to Wikimedia Commons

message: Please sync with the sandbox, where I added a hidden-revisions param, which if supplied categorizes the file into :Category:Copy to Wikimedia Commons with hidden file revisions. Thanks! HouseBlastertalk 17:38, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: * Pppery * it has begun... 17:47, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 21 August 2022 

message: Please sync with the sandbox, which uses |headerstyle= instead of the depreciated |ta1=. Thanks! HouseBlastertalk 17:45, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: . P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 23:51, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 21 February 2023
Talk:Maltese Islands

message: As they stand these don't have much use being seperate articles.  Morwen - Talk 17:12, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Just did that, don't think anyone will complain about this. Also made some changes to the List_of_islands_in_the_Mediterranean page --Pepijn Koster 17:12, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Just curious: why did you choose Maltese islands for the article title, instead of Maltese Islands.  I'm not familiar with the place, but the opening sentence using the word "is" implies that it's a named place, like United States as opposed to United states.  This Maltese government Web page uses upper case. -- Muffuletta 16:46, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Tracking information added by Nelbs 22:35, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject: Wikify 

message: I was wondering why you reverted the redirect of this article? There is nothing here that is not covered at the Malta or other related articles. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 06:25, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revivial of this article
Talk:ALCO DH643

message: We don't have Krauss-Maffei listed as a diesel builder. Six cab units and 15 hood units were imported into the US for use on the D&RGW and SP railroads. The DH643 was part of the Southern Pacific's testing program for Hydralic Drive Diesels. Alco cataloged, but never sold a DH650 diesel model that would have produced 5000 horsepower. --SSW9389 17:19, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Pailhead

message: In my vinyl collection; Trait has 4 songs, while I will refuse and No Bunny was released as a 7" single.
More: The Trait Vinyl has four songs, the CD is a reissue and contains all six songs from both EP's. I Will Refuse/No Bunny was also released as a 12". All of the above are also available on the Ministry reissue, "Side Trax."
: Updated discography with all of Pailhead's releases.  Morganfitzp (talk) 17:43, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Petro Grigorenko

message: I reverted the move of Grigorenko to Hryhorenko as per follows. Yes, he IS an ethnic Ukrainian and be him a modern politician of Ukraine or smth like this, he would have certainly be called Hryhorenko in English, like we are using Ukrainian spellings for Volodymyr Lytvyn, Petro Poroshenko, Oleksandr Moroz, etc. 
Hryhorenko, however, entered the world news long time ago and, justly or not, he is called Grigorenko by the world media. You can conduct a google test and see the difference in usage. Our job, at encyclopedia, is not to "promote" the "correct" usage but to reflect the prevailing usage and the prevailing usage is determined by the English language media. Before moving the articles, please propose the move first and wait a little bit for responses in the future? Thanks! --Irpen 17:37, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grigorenko or Hryhorenko 

message: Grygorenko. Ukrained 11:48, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some redirects for better searching 

message: Moscow Helsinki Group was created in 1976 - so the words "in 1960s Grigorenko became a member of the Moscow Helsinki Watch Group" are wrong  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nr10232 (talk • contribs) 20:57, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors 

message: According to Google Scholar, the use of 'Petro' is far more common than 'Pyotr'. This article space should become the redirect, and the Petro nomenclature the article space. An informal WP:RM, anyone? --Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:11, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pyotr or Petro? 
Talk:Kunyang Chhish

message: I am planning on removing the Pakistan elevation ranking from the infobox per reasons given at Talk:K2#Pakistan rankings. Reply at the K2 talk page or here if there's an objection. --RacerX11 Talk to meStalk me  00:50, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pakistan ranking 
Talk:Tropical wave

message: If the  template covers articles for WikiProject Tropical Cyclones, shouldn't this have  instead, since waves are technically not cyclones?  Sorry, just playing devils advocate with technicalities...-Runningonbrains 12:00, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something to consider... 

message: Can it be catastrophic or not catastrophic TECHADV AND EDU (talk) 15:32, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tropical Waves
Talk:List of rural and urban districts in England in 1973

message: I noticed this one listed in Cumberland. I just wondered whether this should acutally read Millom, after the town in Copeland? I've never heard of a 'Milton', and Millom doesnt really seem to be covered by any of the others. Robdurbar 22:03, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good spot.  Morwen - Talk 15:41, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Milton Rural District]]
Talk:Enchanted Arms

message: I can confirm that it's 4/5 based on X-Play's podcast (dated 9/6/06 - keeping old podcasts really helps!), but as this is not the date of the show's airing, I'm not sure how best to go about citing it. --Masem 01:43, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  X-Play rating 

message: Just wondering.. is an achievement section even necessary? It adds nothing to the article. It's just.. there. 12.205.224.183 (talk) 07:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Achievement section 

message: This site says the title of the Japanese PlayStation 3 release is Enchant Arm. Japanese Wikipedia also has two separate articles for the X360 and PS3 versions. (link). SharkD (talk) 05:24, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game title 

message: if there is any differences between the xbox 360 and playstation 3 versions please include them in the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.8.180.111 (talk) 00:02, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  version differences 

message: All right. I am considering a major overhaul on the article to make it to GA status. Here's what we need to do:
*Gameplay section - we can merge the Combat / Battle system section into it and create the Gameplay section, removing gamecruft as we do so.
*Plot section - merge the characters and story into it and add setting with sources in it. The story section also needs to be expanded with sourced quotes from the game and instruction manual.
*Development section - needs to be created if we can find the relevant information, including the soundtrack.
*Reception - we need to add sources for the reviews.
I think those ideas would be very interesting. Any other comments or objections? Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:44, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major overhaul for GA status
Talk:Los Angeles County Fire Department

message: Is that right?  There 163 engines but only 32 trucks (Trucks + Towers + Quints)?  That seems low. --plaws (talk) 22:29, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: OK.  Just seems weird.  The closer to the east coast you get, the ratio gets closer to 3:2 (Engines to Trucks).  Thanks! --plaws (talk) 00:48, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I totally agree with you. But also the difference between city and suburb. See San Jose Fire Department for example which is 3:1. --Zackmann08 (talk) 00:50, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of trucks? 
Talk:The Feminine Mystique

message: The claim The Feminine Mystique is even remotely plagiarism of The Second Sex is made by somebody who never read either book, let alone both.The two books aren't even remotely similar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.53.202.228 (talk • contribs) 26 November 2005‎
I agree, the plagiarism claim is weird and comes at the end of a block of negative commentary. It's not neessary to repeat this claim and I will remove it.
7infinity 18:25, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006

message: I did a web search for this site (mentioned at the end of the article) because I had trouble understanding how credible it was. The only mentions of it are on Wikipedia or on anti-feminist sites. I think it's important to give some sense of who raises these "questions" about Friedan's work in the article, and as to whether these are anti-feminist activists, serious academics, or both. Would it be appropriate to just remove the paragraph, or mention that it's a web site that (unlike Friedan's book itself) has not been peer-reviewed or critiqued thoroughly? Catamorphism 03:50, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I rather agree. Wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopedia, yes? Chainedwind 00:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cheerless Fantasies 
Talk:Goodbye, Farewell and Amen

message: Should this episode be broken up into 5(I think) half hour episodes and added to the rerun rotation? Is it fair to have to wait a few years to see it? I guess its gonna be on MeTV once a year for at least awhile(as it was tonight), and you can download and/or watch it anytime you want. But part of me thinks it should be part of the rerun rotation. I really loved seeing the cast and crew commentary intermixed in the episode on MeTV. You wouldn't get that when its added to the rotation though.
Its probably gonna happen eventually isn't it? But not with appreciation. Some Millenial or gen-Z video engineer is gonna do it at the request of their millennial or gen-Z boss. Nether having appreciation for the show. People under 40 don't appreciate anything except the internet and their phone. Heat8888 (talk) 05:52, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add This Episode To The Rerun Rotation?
Category talk:Doctor Who

message: I am doubtful whether this category should be in :Category:Wikipedia categories named after fictional characters as it currently is. Technically the character is the Doctor although I know the media do use Doctor Who to refer to the character (and the credits over the years have used both). To be honest I can see arguments both ways, but I think discussion of this would be useful.Dunarc (talk) 00:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia categories named after fictional characters 

message: I have removed this from :Category:Parallel universes in fiction, given that parallel universes are a fairly minor part of Doctor Who and certainly not a key plot point of the series as a whole. Dunarc (talk) 22:37, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The article Doctor Who is still in :Category:Parallel universes in fiction so maybe that should be discussed at Talk:Doctor Who. —anemoneprojectors— 16:24, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:Parallel universes in fiction
Talk:The Sirens of Time

message: Although I think it's OK to list other Big Finish stories as between TV and audio stories, for this I didn't feel as comfortable listing other audio stories.  The production code tells us that it comes after Master, and I think the 5th and 6th Doctor settings come from comments by Gary Russell, but is the 6th Doctor portion before or after his adventures with Evelyn?  If anyone feels comfortable being more specific, go ahead, but I'm leaving it like this for now. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 04:23, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The DWRG has a box out on this particular point - it's during his time with Evelyn - and makes a pretty convincing argument, but that's their prerogative and privilege to speculate (which we don't have). --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 04:28, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Set between" 

message: Start Class:
* The article contains a useful picture or graphic
* There are multiple links to websites with more info on the topic
* There is one subheading which fully treats an element of the topic - the cast section and info box with useful info
To increase to B class will need expansion of plot and additional sections on production, etc as well as more clear referencing. Plot section could do with being trimmed and changed so that it is less in-universe
Importance Scale:
Mid - While the story is notable within Doctor Who field it is unknown outside of this--Amxitsa (talk) 21:22, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality Assessment
Talk:Kevin Dineen

message: I was gonna add that former NHL player Gord Dineen, is a brother of Kevin Dineen, but wasn't sure. Does anyone know for sure GoodDay 18:10, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Just found out on the HOCKEY HALL OF FAME website (A-Z players), Kevin & Gord are brothers. GoodDay 19:38, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Brothers?
Talk:Amboori

message: "the only lake in the world with man-eating crocodiles" says who? More info please... Until then it is gone - (Erebus555 18:19, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:After Words

message: do any wikipedians now who is on afterwords this week if you do could you please put it hear on the talk page or add it to the article if you did i would really apperciate it. 68.161.121.86, 18:22, 26 November 2005
:Please sign your comments on talk pages by typing ~~~~ at the end of each message, Thanks. According to the Book TV Website, on Saturday, November 26 2005 at 8:00 pm and Sunday, November 27 2005 at 6:00 pm and at 9:00 pm, the show is:
:"After Words: Bruce Chadwick interviewed by George Lengel, Former journalist Bruce Chadwick discusses his sixth work of history, titled, "The First American Army: The Untold Story of George Washington and the Men Behind America's First Fight for Freedom."
:I've added a link to the relevant page to the article, so people can check this easily. - N (talk) 18:38, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Having proposed a revision to this article on the discussion page at WikiProject Television a week ago and having received no comment one way or the other, I've just moved it into the mainspace. This article was a stub, flagged for lacking citations; now it is fairly well developed and properly cited. As mentioned in that notice, I have a potential conflict with C-SPAN (I currently work with their communications team) and so have taken care with my rewrite, especially regarding reliable sources and maintaining a neutral point of view. If you have any questions about this version of the article, please let me know. Cheers, WWB Too (talk) 04:01, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion