lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars/Archive 2

message: I was just reading through the article and while it's a reasonable article, it seems to contain a lot of information which is either based on rumours or is lacking in sources. We should maybe look at cutting back some of the article until EA reveal more concreate details.
It also seems to be a bit flabby, rather badly worded in places and as Someguy-021 says possible POV based in parts. S.Skinner 12:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Concerns over lack of sources

message: Its been awhile since any new game images have been added, there are now plenty of gameplay images floating around the net from GC, someone should probably add one or two to the article. In particluar, I think a screenshot showing off the Nod and GDI bases could be good, but really anything would be an improvement. -Derek 65.188.254.26 22:31, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Images? 

message: I made this little protest piece:
C&C3	This user knows that C&C is only properly done with FK's music.
<Br /><Br />
Frank Klepacki is a featured article candidate, by the way. --Zeality 21:57, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Userbox heads-up 

message: A link to the recent interview with Mike Verdu, executive producer of Command & Conquer: Tiberium Wars; http://www.gamereplays.org/community/index.php?showtopic=133473
In it, some details are revealed such as that the Zones will no longer be having a significant impact on gameplay as was initially announced, and also that Tiberium Wars will not be featuring the famous types of installation procedures as seen in for example Command & Conquer: Tiberian Dawn and Command & Conquer: Tiberian Sun. 80.201.104.250 13:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mike Verdu Leipziger Games Convention interview 

message: Theyre taking navies out come on Jamhaw 18:27, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Where is this comming from? I thought they had images of carriers? Voice-of-All 15:15, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Navy's are gone

message: Way way to much on Generals some should be there sure but the whole nicknamed it Age of Generals and so on does not need to be there some sure not that much. Also we could add feautures that were cut or that people wanted and they have that sort of thing Jamhaw 18:26, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Generals

message: Where is he they cant have not brought him backJamhaw 21:33, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Where in the world is Anton Slavick
Talk:NZR AB class

message: I do not understand, why #732 and #762 are shown at the top end of the table. Could you change or explain, please. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 08:36, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Those two were lost in a shipwreck, and replacements were built for them with the same number. I'm personally in favour of keeping the table as it is. pcuser42 (talk) 09:25, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table to be sorted, please 

message: It is a common fallacy that Ab 608 was 'named'. It was not. It was selected to carry the cast plates (not locomotive 'nameplates') commemorating the Battle of Passchendaele. To say the name 'Passchendaele' was accorded to the locomotive is incorrect. It would be good if the page could be amended to reflect this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Throttleer (talk • contribs) 12:55, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There are plenty of references to the locomotive being named Passchendaele. If there's a reference that contradicts the referenced book then that should be added. --LJ Holden 04:14, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locomotive naming
Talk:Çiğ köfte

message: Should we add this section? Pixius  talk 13:30, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: There's already a mention of it in the Turkey section. Unless there's a larger amount of significant material to be added, I don't think we need to create a separate section for it at the moment. --IamNotU (talk) 16:21, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Health concerns 

message: It would be good if the Aramaic word remains inside as it originates from Edessa urfa in the territory of the Aramaeans. [Aycin] LightningJonathan87 (talk) 19:32, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ciğköfte is in Aramaic [Acyin] 

message: In early period of Turkish Republic Mahmut Esat Bozkurt andYusuf Mahzar say that Kurds are not different from cannibals in Africa because they mix raw mince and grounded grains and eat (cig kofte) so why do today's Turks claim that it is a "Turkish" cuisine? 193.140.239.217 (talk) 23:55, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turkish cuisine
Talk:Udine

message: GE geo location is wrong.. about 20kms too east
83.190.236.154 07:04, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google Earth Location 

message: what does "urban area" mean? why no reference about? population amount with no  source too  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.51.236.89 (talk) 19:17, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Its population was 100,032 in 2012, and that of its urban area was 176,000. 

message: I've restored the name section [following its deletion on 13 December 2012‎ by the anonymous user at 173.34.56.21] on the article because it's well supported by scholarly references (in fact, it's better referenced than the rest of the article). Please feel free to add additional sources. Doremo (talk) 17:57, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name section
Talk:Edward Bullard

message: I believe he was on the faculty of that school when he passed away/--Jrm2007 (talk) 05:56, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  final position at ucsd 
Talk:The Man Don't Give a Fuck

message: The second single was stated to have entered the charts at 14 (which charts ?). http://www.everyhit.com/searchsec.php says the highest position was 16. -- Beardo 00:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Charts

message: Doesn't "Fucking In Heaven" by Fatboy Slim hold that record for most uses of the f-word in a track?  That had 108 uses of the f-word Andrew07 (talk) 12:39, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Record?
Talk:Ekmel Özbay

message: (www.fen.bilkent.edu.tr/~ozbay) --  Drini 02:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Emil Wiechert

message: It would be great if we could hear a recording of a native speaker of the German language pronouncing his name. Thank you! Nerd271 (talk) 14:46, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Northrop XP-56 Black Bullet

message: The serial numbers for the XP-56 prototypes were 41-1786 and 42-38353.
:The Smithsonian web site gives them as 41-786 and 42-38353. Jones; "US Fighters: Army-Air Force 1925 to 1980s", Aero (1975) gives 41-786 and 42-38553 but shows a photo on which 238353 can be clearly seen, so we may take that "553" as a typo. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 10:14, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  XP-56 serial numbers 

message: Was the "Black Bullet" nickname sufficently well-known to justify its inclusion in the article title? Everythign I ever read about the XP-56 either didn't mention the name at all or as an aside... - The Bushranger One ping only 00:56, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Jones; "US Fighters: Army-Air Force 1925 to 1980s", Aero (1975) titles it the "Northrop XP-56 Black Bullet" I seem to recall some suggestion - the poster was asking for confirmation - that the first prototype was painted black some time after the photos were taken, but I cannot place it now. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 09:53, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

text: [Update] From these photos it looks like it was the second prototype that got painted black. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 10:05, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name? 

message: The article currently states that "the first XP-56 was destroyed 8 October 1943 when the tire on the left gear blew out during a high-speed (~130 mph) taxi". This is unreferenced. However, Jones; "US Fighters: Army-Air Force 1925 to 1980s", Aero (1975) says that "the first machine suffered nose-wheel shimmy during a high-speed ground run." Can anybody support the left-tyre story or should we change the article as per Jones? — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 09:56, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: [Update] The Smithsonian web site gives the left-tyre story. Any chance of a tiebreaker? — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 10:26, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of the crash?
Talk:Emilio Segrè

message: Son Gino Segrè also?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.2.40.144 (talk) 20:17, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think this article should mention the fact that, at least in the United Kingdom, the method of displaying the known isotopes on the N-Z plane is named after Segrè. Also, if anyone has any information regarding why this was named after him that would also be useful.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.79.162.144 (talk) 14:25, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Segrè Chart 

message: This phrase in the article has to be wrong:
"In June 1944, Segrè was summoned into Oppenheimer's office and informed that while his father was safe, his mother had been rounded up by the Nazis in October 1943. Segrè never saw either of his parents again. His father died in Rome in October 1943"
Note he was told in 1944 his father was safe. Later is says he died in 1943.
46.26.35.98 (talk) 00:58, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but maybe the information given by Oppenheimer was wrong. Anyway, we should check the source about that. Alex2006 (talk) 05:47, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Verified against the source. His father died in Rome in October 1944, not 1943. A typo. Hawkeye7 (talk) 08:53, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks, Hawkeye7! Alex2006 (talk) 09:23, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible error 

message: He was always known as Emilio Segrè, that should be the article name. the name in the lede should of course be his full name. Emilio Gino Segrè should be a redirect.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 19:41, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The moving happened maybe because the Nobel prize was assigned to Emilio Gino, although in Italy he is universally known as Emilio, as all his book were published under this name...Alex2006 (talk) 19:44, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. if anyone has doubt, his autobiography was written by ES, not EGS,  Mercurywoodrose (talk) 20:15, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree too. I see you already raised a request at WP:RM.  Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:24, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: article name

message: I just removed the claim, added by an anonymous ip, that Segrè has been nicknamed "father of the bomb". This claim is unsupported and, given the work accomplished by Segrè in Los Alamos, totally exaggerated. Alex2006 (talk) 08:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Father of the Bomb? 

message: I am going to change his citizenship status as an Italian as ending in 1944 because he became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 1944. According to Italian nationality law, any Italian citizen who naturalized as a citizen of a foreign country before 15 August 1992 would have automatically lost Italian citizenship.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scarslayer01 (talk • contribs) 04:35, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citizenship
Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Alameda Measure A

message: You can't request mediation over an AfD.  Let it run its course.  Take it up with the closing admin who will decide on whether or not the discussion's arguments were valid one way or the other.  User:Zoe|(talk) 00:38, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Mowster claims to have contacted administrators by email here. I have no idea if anyone ever did anything about it; I never received any information from anyone besides Mowster. That's still misrepresenting the steps taken to date. Argyriou (talk) 05:10, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This is nonsense
Talk:Mahdi al-Modarresi

message: Objection:
Why don't you mention that Mr. Modarressi is anti Iran and Anti Velayat Faqih.
Why don't you mention that Mr. Modarresi never ever in his 10000 lectures mentioned Palestine and the Israeli oppression!!!!!
I hate to say that but he's pro western approach will never help the Muslim Ummah !!!
I challenge anyone to show me that Mr. Modarresi made even one single reference to Palestine, Imam Khomaini or the Israeli aggression  in his lectures???!!
Such people are not worthy of respect at all.
  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.70.142.67 (talk) 22:01, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The precise wording of the external article does not appear in the history of the Wikipedia article until the revision of 30 December 2010, so it's not possible that the external article was copied from the Wikipedia article.  The note "(Source: Wikipedia)" likely means that the information was taken from the Wikipedia article but re-written in different words.  ... discospinster talk 17:02, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shall we get a picture?--88.111.129.157 (talk) 11:13, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 
Talk:USS Greeneville

message: In the upper right, why is there a picture of a submarine where either the Ehime Maru's picture or no picture ought to be?
:Because this is an article about a submarine, not the Ehime Maru or nothing. ➥the Epopt 00:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah... I was tricked by the redirect on the Ehime Maru page. It links back to the USS Greeneville page. :) --FFLaguna 06:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Submarine picture instead of Ehime Maru picture 

message: Why was it named for Greeneville, TN? Seems like a small, random town to get a submarine named after it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Awiseman (talk • contribs) 18:04, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name? 

message: Needs work from the editors who added the material in the first place.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.169.29.40 (talk) 11:40, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  article badly needs referencing
Talk:Fernando Quevedo

message: Removed "de la Trinidad2 from name as it is uncited and not on his personal web page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.55.91 (talk) 14:48, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "de la Trinidad" from name
Talk:Galileo Ferraris

message: Nikola Tesla invented the rotating magnetic field in 1882. This is the basis for an induction motor!--Свифт (talk) 14:21, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 1882
Talk:Acalyptratae

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Homoneura sp wb2.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on July 17, 2010. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2010-07-17. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 19:10, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Homoneura sp wb2.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Achelata

message: , the image is not misidentified, and as I explained at Talk:Scyllarides_latus it is a much better, sharper image with more detail around the eyes and far better coloring than what it replaces.  Not sure why you're saying it is an incorrect id. Atsme📞📧 15:08, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: As I have noted elsewhere, your image is probably of S. aequinoctialis. I do not agree that it is of superior quality; the image of S. latus in the Mediterranean is far sharper over most of the image. --Stemonitis (talk) 15:20, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 
Talk:Acherontia styx

message: This seems to be a little contentious; for purposes of clarification, the movie promotional posters showed Acherontia atropos, which would also be the species most likely to be imported, and is by far the most well-known. However, according to the script, the shipment of larvae was from "Suriname" - but none of the moths in this genus occur in Suriname, or even this hemisphere, so this is a problem in trusting the script. The actual moths *used* in the movie were not even this genus; they were hornworm moths altered with a magic marker to make the "skull head" on the thorax. The quote from the movie script, at the only time a species name is uttered, is Agent Starling, meet Mr. Acherontia styx - so there is yet another conflict involving the script - this time, conflicting with the posters. Given that the only actual identifiable images of the moth are of atropos, and the fact that all of the other folklore and cultural references in history refer to atropos, it seems far better to discuss the link to the movie under atropos rather than under styx. Dyanega 18:21, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which species of moth was in "Silence of the Lambs" movie 

message: This scientific paper may help with this article. Unfortunately it is behind a paywall. Death's head hawk moth, Acherontia styx westwood (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae)- Its taxonomy and biology by Devi S. Jamuna*, Ramaraju K.Ambrosia10 (talk) 20:55, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Scientific paper on species
Talk:Acrididae

message: In case article is created Leonard G. 02:55, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: we don't have the article Catantops sylvestris--Estopedist1 (talk) 09:42, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image found on commons 

message: we have a red link ["Pauliniidae" - assume Pauliniinae]. Is it a synonym? See eg --Estopedist1 (talk) 09:42, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a monotypic subfamily - so article needed for genus Paulinia Blanchard, 1843 - then redirect there (now done). Roy Bateman (talk) 08:17, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synonym Pauliniidae?
Talk:Acroceridae

message: Could someone pls. add a list of genera?  Thanks! philiptdotcom (talk) 23:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of genera? 
Talk:Actias

message: Currently, the thee taxonomically distinct 'Moon moths' (Actias, Argema, and Graellsia isabellae,) each have their own articles. The three birdwing genera, however, are all represented by the one article, instead of separate articles for each genus. I wonder if doing the same would be a good idea here also... I'm not sure. Ypna (talk) 07:08, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moon moth article 
Talk:Aculeata

message: An editor has been making multiple changes to the taxonomy in this and related articles without providing any sources. I've reverted these for now; obviously we'd like to have an up-to-date taxonomy and phylogeny, but since uncited changes cannot be verified (WP:V) this is not an acceptable approach. It will be fine to have the changes reinstated supported by suitable reliable sources. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:55, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncited changes to taxonomy

message: I think this article should reflect the superfamilies currently listed the Vespoidea article.
Bob Webster (talk) 21:07, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I endorse this, but only if the necessary edits are made first to the Vespoidea article and the articles for the other superfamilies, some of which presently do not exist at all (e.g., Scolioidea is just a redirect). The Vespoidea article will also need considerable editing to ensure that what it says refers only to the two remaining constituent families, and not the taxa that have been removed. There are also a lot of the "What links here" links to Vespoidea that will no longer be appropriate, and will need to point to other superfamilies. It's not very difficult, but it's also not trivial. Dyanega (talk) 21:34, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Vespoidea superfamily split
Talk:Georges-Louis Le Sage

message: Telegraph reference?
I'm looking at https://archive.org/details/noticedelavieet00prgoog/page/n187/mode/2up and I do not see any evidence that he claims to have actually built the device, a claim also supported over here: https://archive.org/details/cu31924031221249/page/n117/mode/2up ... I think it was just a plan. Kristopolous (talk) 17:24, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Adalia (beetle)

message: I think there is also  Adalia decempunctata.--213.16.165.214 (talk) 23:49, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Adalia angulifera  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lancelot70 (talk • contribs) 14:51, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is more than two species
Talk:Adetomyrma

message: There was a lot of material on the page about this name, however it seems to be incorrectly attributed to this species. Have added references for what is now stated. Shyamal (talk) 10:20, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is an illustration here http://www.alexanderwild.com/Ants/Taxonomic-List-of-Ant-Genera/Adetomyrma/8714305_tUUr5/1/630011359_gd6qf#630011359_gd6qf but there appears to be no scholarly/reliable source with information on LHF in Adetomyrma. Shyamal (talk) 10:26, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dracula ants
Talk:Cutchogue, New York

message: This article needs a map.  Badagnani 01:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs map
Talk:Adonis blue

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Polyommatus bellargus male, Aveyron, France - Diliff.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on March 7, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-03-07. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Polyommatus bellargus male, Aveyron, France - Diliff.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Lysandra bellargus male underside 2.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for May 25, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-05-25. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:42, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Lysandra bellargus male underside 2.jpg scheduled for POTD 

message: The name "Seitz" may not be familiar to all readers - it could be clarified (or linked to Adalbert Seitz perhaps)... Ztaffanb2 (talk) 13:25, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description in Seitz
Talk:Aedes

message: Is Aedes cantator part of the list of Aedes mosquitos whose genus will be renamed to S. ?--Sonjaaa (talk) 03:02, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On Aug. 19th, 2012, the article wash changed to indicate that Aedes feeds during the daytime.  The sources I've seen (like the CDC) indicate it feeds between Dusk and Dawn (http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/lymphaticfilariasis/prevent.html).  Here is the link to the revision where the change was made: []  Was that vandalism?  Or, is there a source for this daytime feeding statement?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.68.190.45 (talk) 18:03, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: mainlydusk/awn,ys![i/tw  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.248.198.223 (talk) 10:06, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Feeding Habits

message: .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.248.198.223 (talk) 10:05, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ipa? 