lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Unique identifier

message: Are globally unique identifiers really possible?
:You mean GUIDs? Possible in the sense they are unique? 118.209.200.11 (talk) 10:51, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untited

message: User:Tijfo098 did not state any reasoning for making the merge from Identification (information) to Unique identifier.  I propose not to make the merge because identification information is not always unique. Captpossum (talk) 15:26, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: How is it that the digital object identifier (DOI) scheme is not mentioned here? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:16, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  DOI 

message: English Deviprkash (talk) 16:43, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science 

message: I have been reviewing the article Unique Identification Number and cannot see a reason why it should exist on its own. Despite what the page says, it does not appear to be distinct from a "unique identifier" but it seems to be more of a specific type of unique identifier. There are some comments about U.S. government definitions of the term that could be useful to mention in this article, but there is clear and significant overlap. The UI article already mentions National identification numbers as a type of "unique identifier" but the UIN page tries to say that these are UINs and not UIs. I'm going to immediately redirect the UIN page to this UI page in the interest of time as it seems rather obvious to me that the pages have too much overlap (per WP:MERGEINIT / WP:BOLD). The existing content of the UIN page will be placed below as a triage area per the NPP flowchart. I will be marking the UIN page as reviewed. Paradoxsociety 04:19, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging in progress from [[Unique Identification Number]]
Talk:Sybil Elgar

message: to be honest i cant really be arsed to do anything about it.
I was in the process of aquiring the expressd permission from NAS to republish the specific article.
But as the page does not neet the militia style tactics of control set out by the high and mighty wikipedia guys, well, i give in.
She was a great person, most people know that, some do not, that is a shame...........
Go forth and dissolve....
i will contact ppl regarding the transfer of this article and thae talk to someone at nas.
danke schon —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imperfect Editor (talk • contribs) 
:The does not establish notability, that is, it doesn't even say why the person is actually noteworthy for an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a discriminate collection of information, it is an encyclopedia and has policies for inclusion. An encyclopedia full of two-sentence articles would be useless. Do not say you weren't warned, the new article creation page clearly states "Articles that do not cite reliable published sources will be deleted" in big bold letters.
:If the person was indeed notable then the article ought to convey that; alternatively, you could have explained that on this talk page. The apologist comment you added, however, helps nobody. -- intgr 13:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2007/jan/24/guardianobituaries.obituaries2. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Malinaccier (talk) 22:27, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:William Masters

message: Nobody has written on the talk page?? This article is of very high importance in several fields of study, and I'm surprised that it is still a stub and is so lacking in information. Yikes. Randy Kryn 15:28 10 October 2013 (UTC)
:Randy Kryn, well, like Virginia E. Johnson, much of Masters's work is covered at the Masters and Johnson article. I'm not sure that there is a lot to state about these two outside of their work. Flyer22 (talk) 00:27, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Still stubby
Talk:Virginia E. Johnson

message: There is a kind of glaring omission in the article: when did she change her name to Johnson, and was it on her own initiative or so early that the change was made by her parents? The likely reason for the change is, of course, a wish to avoid showcasing the Jewish and/or German roots of her family; Eshelman (shortened to 'E.') could likely be either, it sounds vaguely Yiddish. Somebody should look for reliable information on this.83.254.151.33 (talk) 13:46, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: When she was very young, she married a Missouri politician; the marriage lasted two days. She later wed a lawyer many years her senior; that marriage also ended in divorce. In 1950, she married George Johnson, a bandleader, with whom she had two children. The couple were divorced in 1956.  Source: .  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 13:58, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surname change 

message: This chapter seems to be mixed up, the date of marriage with Masters is missing and it looks like residues from a split wit a collective article masters&Johnson are remaining. --Manorainjan (talk) 01:00, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chapter personal life 
Talk:Lambiek

message: I am moving the following uncited material here until it can be properly supported with inline citations of reliable, secondary sources, per WP:V, WP:CS, WP:IRS, WP:PSTS, WP:BLP, WP:NOR, et al. This diff shows where it was in the article. Nightscream (talk) 19:58, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncited material in need of citations
Talk:Louis Gigante

message: Starbuck Prescott 12:45, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article at present contains a claim of sexual misconduct that is unsourced. Furthermore, I'm wondering if the claim is of such a nature that it does not meet the standards of "Biographies of living persons", but I'm not certain how to deal with it. As I see it, Mr Gigante is not a public person, and as such great care should be taken when writing about crimes, particularly of a sexual nature. Any tips on how to proceed?  KaldeFakta68 (talk) 22:19, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: As a simple priest or relative of crime figures he may not be "public", but being a politician and activist do make him such. Added the Daily News cite.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 23:10, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claims of sexual misconduct: Unsourced and irrelevant? 

message: As per "Untitled" at the top of these comments, there is reason to think Gigante co-operated with his family in concealing Vincent Gigante's feigned insanity. See that article. Spicemix (talk) 09:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mob
Talk:Rijndael S-box

message: As of yet, this page contains lots of tables and code, and little info on the actual design. I'm going to try to add more content about the S-Box itself and how it was designed Ufretin 12:33, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That was me. My apologies. I've encountered several incidents lately where anonymous users  just change numbers with no valid reason. You didn't include an edit summary in your first edit, but I should have checked the talk page anyhow. Thanks for catching the error and  making the correction (twice) and I hope you'll continue contributing to Wikipedia.--agr 12:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Miscellaneous discussions

message: The section where there should be a vector for the sbox in c/c++ is left blank.As well in the inverse sbox. why is that?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.54.129.14 (talk) 20:21, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  initialization of the table left blank 

message: Can someone coomment on where "a given number in GF(2^8)" comes from? Is it generated from the key or is it a fixed value on all hosts?
Or something different entirely?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.215.59.137 (talk) 17:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of "a given number in <math>GF(2^8)</math>" 

message: According to http://www.samiam.org/galois.html, the generators of Rijndael's galois field include 3, 5, 6, 9, ..., but not 2.  So the code, which multiplies and divides by 2, will not be able to calculate the S-box for all elements of the field.
74.79.8.168 (talk) 08:27, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  C implementation of S-box does not actually work
Talk:Romeo y Julieta (cigar)

message: Production of the machine made vitolas was stopped in 2000 / 2001 and all Romeo y Julietas since that date are totally hand made, as can be seen on the box stamps.  It is a little confiusing as some of names of the previously machine bunched & hand finishes vitolas, such as the no 1 to no 3 tubos have been kept in the new hand made range.
Thus a no 3 tubo from 1999 is only hand finished, but a no 3 tubo from 2003 is totally hand made.  
--Jamie Driscoll 12:33, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I have initiated a proposal for WikiProject Cigars, dedicated to improving the coverage of cigar brands, the cigar making process, and other cigar-related matters on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in the project or would like to weigh in, pro or con, on this idea, please pay a quick visit to Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Cigars. Thanks! —Tim Carrite (talk) 18:28, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal for WikiProject Cigars
Talk:Quadratestadt

message: I suggest to set this article as a Redirect to the article Mannheim. The content can be moved to the article Mannheim. --MaiusGermanicus (talk) 15:07, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I redirected it. --Viennaiswaiting (talk) 15:57, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Margaret of Scotland, Queen of Norway

message: The articles do say that. Margaret's father, Alexander III of Scotland, had three children: Margaret of Scotland, Queen of Norway, born 28 February 1261; Alexander, Prince of Scotland, born 21 January 1264; and David. born 20 March 1272. All predeceased their father: David in 1281, Margaret in 1283, and Alexander in 1284, with Alexander III dying in 1286. Hence, Margaret of Scotland, Queen of Norway, was heir presumptive between her birth in 1261 and 1284, when Prince Alexander, the heir-apparent, was born. Given that, plus the fact Margaret did not inherit the throne, and she falls into :Category:Non-inheriting heirs presumptive. ₪ MIESIANIACAL 19:15, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I got her confused with her daughter, Alexander III's granddaughter. Something in the name, I reckon. No huge worry. GoodDay (talk) 20:39, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heir-presumptive who didn't inherit the throne
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Werdna 2

message: Werdna's edit stats using wannabe Kate tool as of 12:49, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I'm wondering what was going on with this diff. I reverted it, and then reverted back when I saw that an oppose was being added in the diff. But Konstable !voted with his main account, not with Konstablesock. And I don't know why those comments were removed. Grandmasterka 23:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He must have edited an earlier version or something.  (On a side note: my Konstable account was not accessible during the time when I made my first comment, now it is, so I changed the sig to avoid confusion)--Konst.ableTalk 23:59, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird diff 

message: To those not yet aware, this question has unfortunately caused a lot of trouble for some people (though not Werdna himself it seems) - there has been a huge over-blown discussion on WP:AN/I along with 2 blocks to established users over revert wars on this RfA.
Well Werdna has actually replied to me off-wiki and agreed that these are indeed legit logs of him on ED.  He replied not too long after I had asked him, but I had already slipped out, and as I have not been a regular on IRC in months, I have not received this message until just now.  (I wish I had checked it sooner, it would have saved the mess on noticeboards.)  As I had already come to this conclusion, Werdna says that he was venting frustration and has never really had such intentions.  Also a note that though the page was created in December, the logs are from a "very long time ago" as Werdna puts it.  I personally do not consider anything serious in this particular case - I trust that Werdna is not participating in anything of the sort on Wikipedia, and venting frustration off-wiki is not a crime.   It is regretable that such a small issue has spawned an angry discussion taking up half of WP:AN/I.--Konstable 06:50, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problematic question 

message: With respect to the "Trebor" oppose vote, it's an obtuse joke in reference to Wizardry IV: The Return of Werdna. Sorry about the confusion. >Radiant< 09:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trebor
Talk:25 mm grenade

message: This page needs cleaned up.
There are two different rounds, 25 x 40 mm and 25 x 59 mm .
Janes.com article states 25 x 40 mm is a low velocity round developed for the XM25. The 25 x 59 mm round was developed for the XM109 and XM107.
http://www.janes.com/articles/Janes-Ammunition-Handbook/25-x-59-B-LW25-grenades-United-States.html
Should this page be made into two pages? Ploxhoi (talk) 18:45, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Casspir

message: As of May 2019, the Malian Army is starting to use this vehicle. Please adapt the relevant parts of this article. Thanks!
https://www.bmvg.de/de/aktuelles/eutm-mali-ausbildung-am-casspir-51124  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.63.253.221 (talk) 09:03, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Users

message: Who or what was TFM, mentioned in the text?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.164.106.236 (talk) 18:21, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: As stated in the article it was the first manufacturer to mass produce the Casspir after the initial development work by the CSIR. The company still exists and still makes armoured vehicles, though not Casspirs. See http://www.tfm.co.za -- Roger (talk) 18:48, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  TFM 

message: Calling Koevoet "infamous" is POV --105.4.5.213 (talk) 01:09, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV
Talk:Saeftinghe

message: Unfortunately there's not yet an English page about the nature reserve Saeftinghe:
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verdronken_Land_van_Saeftinghe
It would be great if somebody can takes the initiative to create an English page and translation.
I'm from the Netherlands so my language skills are not good enough to do this myself.
Thanks a head Saeftinghe kenner (talk) 17:46, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can somebody create a page about the nature reserve?
Talk:Kurnell, New South Wales

message: Does anyone know where the name Kurnell comes from? Is it Aboriginal or does it relate to corn? 1.158.108.17 (talk) 09:42, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly "Origin of Name - It is widely accepted that the Gweagal Aboriginal group, part of the larger Dharawal group, called the peninsula "Cunnel" which was Anglicised to become Kurnell. Origin of Name Aussie TownsFleet Lists (talk) 09:54, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: Please stop, make your own webpage for your band. - Vicer 13:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whoever keeps adding Rickstar riot to the page 

message: I think the changes that I have made to the article improves the overall look and layout. A lot of the images that were in the article before hand were all of the same thing taken from different angles, like the sandstone cliff pictures. enough saidPoorPhotoremovalist (talk) 08:01, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There are two images in this article of the same thing. I don't see the point of having both of them in here PoorPhotoremovalist (talk) 08:00, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes

message: A few sources related to the storm today which seems to have cause substantial damage in Kurnell (and elsewhere):
* Sydney tornado: Clean-up underway in Kurnell after 'unprecedented' storm delivers 213kph winds ABC News, 16 December 2015
* Sydney tornado: witness the devastation ABC News, 16 December 2015
* Sydney residents in shock after tornado sbs.com.au, 16 December 2015"Wind gust of 213km/h recorded in Kurnell at 10:33am, the fastest wind speed recorded in NSW history" (!)
220 of Borg 10:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  16 December 2015 storm
Talk:Damnation Crusade

message: any information on why thereis two different covers for the first issue ?
:Alternate covers are used a lot, especially on first issues, as it gives a nice boost to sales making the numbers look a lot better. (Emperor 14:16, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternate covers?

message: Apparently, this page is a "stub". What do we need to add to un-stub it? I never understood the whole thing about copyright on images, so anything like that will get deleted if I add it. Should we add the outline of the whole series as it gets released, or what? --D'Argent 18:30, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Simple answer is: Plot ;) . Don't bother splitting it up into issue #1, issue #2 kind of business but if someone fleshes out a decent plot section then that would tick my box for removing the stub tags. I don't think it needs anymore images unless there is something important that needs illustrating (a few panels are considered fair use as they are only a small part of a larger work but it needs to be fairly low resolution so the best thing is to aim for something round about the size you want it). I'd say go for the plot and it would be looking solid and more rounded. I might dig out some reviews if I can find them and drop them in too. (Emperor 18:35, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What Now?
Talk:Cheltenham (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I've challenged the assertion that 10% of the electorate are students at the University of Gloucestershire. At the 2011 Census, the number of schoolchildren and full-time students over 18 was 6,422, which is rather less than 10% of the 2010 electorate (77,937). As a significant proportion of these adults will not be at the university, the 10% claim seems unlikely to be accurate. GrounderUK (talk) 18:38, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Tottenham (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I think it is wrong to compare the +/- swing figures from the 2001 Election with those from the 1997 election result rather than with those from the 2000 by-election.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.146.185.214 (talk) 14:42, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are figures correct on 2001 Election Results 

message: Was the proposal implemented? Jackiespeel (talk) 19:28, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  2018 changes
Talk:Ronald Bassett

message: I have not been able to find any references to Ronald Bassett, other than to his books or the films made from them, since the 2001 update to the Contemporary Authors article.  He would now be 84 years of age.  I searched the obituaries in The Times and in the Camberley News and Mail but found nothing. It seems that his last published book was HMS Sheffield: The Life and Times of Old Shiny in 1988. --Bejnar (talk) 18:03, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Living?
Category talk:Roman roads

message: I intend to reorgnaise this category. My intentions are:
Firstly, simplify the structure -
Move all of the regional categories, eg. :Category:Roman Roads in Syria and Palestina provinces, directly into :Category:Roman roads. This will mean only 2 clicks to get from :Category:Roman roads to any Roman Road article.
Abolish the 4 sub-categories, which will now be empty -
- :Category:Roman roads in the provinces
- :Category:Roman roads in the Eastern Empire
- :Category:Roman roads in the Eastern Empire
- :Category:Roman roads in the North African provinces
Secondly, remove all duplicate category entries. Articles will be in their regional sub-categories, but not in higher categories such as :Category:Roman roads.
Thirdly, remove links to articles which are not about Roman roads, such as History of Palestine and History of Syria. The category structure will then contain links to specific roads, and articles about roads, and nothing else.
Any objections or suggestions - please let me know within the next few days.
Bards 13:40, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Category:Ancient Roman roads in Rome should be a sub-category of :Category:Roman roads in Italy. Bards 19:27, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planned Reorganisation 

message: The subcategory :Category:Roman roads in Britannia is arbitrarily subdivided by the road name, ie. Via, Street, Way, -gate. I propose to abolish these subcategories, and group all the roads together under :Category:Roman roads in Britannia. Bards 18:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Category:Ancient Roman roads in Rome should be a sub-category of :Category:Roman roads in Italy. Bards 19:27, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further thoughts 

message: All done, except -
* Roads within Naples and Rome are not listed under Italy aswell.
* Articles about Roman Provinces and regional histories have been left. Not sure whether to remove them or not. They are useful there.
* Roads which cross 2 or more regions are listed in all of them.
Bards 13:36, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorted 

message: Would it not be better to recategorize these roads based on the historic references? Such as sing names and borders of roman provinces rather than modern countries? -- Cat chi? 12:31, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: PS: Just checked wikimedia.commons and :Category:Roman sites, and they all use modern states throughout. So if that is carried through everywhere, that may be more straightforward. Eighter way, it should be consistent. --ZH2010 (talk) 18:25, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:British Columbia Lottery Corporation

message: Note to passing editors: As with BC Pavilion Corporation I think it prudent to keep the 'Corporation' tag at the end of BCLC. It is always referred to as BC Lottery Corporation or its nickname 'BCLC'. Inclusion of 'corporation' is therefore in accordance with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (companies)--Keefer4 13:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Corporation