Talk:Fully Informed Jury Association

message: naem - Er, not sure how this discussion page works. Don't really use wiki on the developing side of things. Anyway, this article is so blatantly biased it hurts to read it on this website. Hell, I agree with a lot of the stuff that they're saying but it's got a slant to it that is undeniable. This article only links to FIJA and FIJA-supporting websites, and the "sources" credited are written by people affiliated with FIJA! I really want to hear from an opposor of FIJA so that I can get some input from the "other side."
I'm also personally interested in answers to questions that FIJA's website could not answer for me. For example, if jury nullification occurs and is in direct violation of the judge's instructions, can a juror be cited for contempt of court? FIJA's website has a ton of propaganda, and it's difficult to discern what the law is and what the law should be in various instances on the website, as the two seem to be used interchangeably.
(Okay, after looking over this article's history, it seems the NPOV flag was spontaneously removed, yet none of the disputed content was modified. There doesn't seem to be a whole lot going on in this discussion area pertaining to that, either. What's going on?)
I think that "is a national organization" should always include information about what nation it is referring to.
SteveG - Realistically, this article comes off with more slant than a bag of roofing tiles, and until someone can think of a good solution or a rephrasing that doesnt make so many unattributable remarks, or state the organisation's views as material facts, we should leave it flagged as a probable NPOV problem.
In my opnion the paragraph "FIJA, as a human rights organization, recognizes that the United States, with 5 percent of the world's population and 25% of the world's prison population, has become a nation of harmless, wrongly-imprisoned citizens, who should not have been convicted." would be better worded. Otherewise I dont see any other problem with this article. Please be spefic which part(s) of the article is NPOV and the reason for why these parts are NPOV Zarutian 20:01, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message:  hopiakuta  Please do  sign  your  signature  on your  message.  %7e%7e   Thank You. - 22:25, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  We need to sign these comments properly, so that one person is distinct from another person. 

message: There are a lot of intriguing articles that someone with legal database access should look at sometime. E.g.,
*http://heinonlinebackup.com/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/uclr65§ion=19
*http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/gonlr32&div=27&id=&page=
*http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a788820038&db=all
Tisane (talk) 08:36, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legal database articles 

message: The "Criticism" section seems very through, but this article does not include much in the way of a summary of the organization stands-for.  Correcting for neutrality violations is all very well, but don't throw out the baby with the bathwater. -- Doom (talk) 20:48, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  need to summarize the position of FIJA 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Fully Informed Jury Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100531001755/http://jailedactivist.info:80/activists/julian-heicklen/ to http://jailedactivist.info/activists/julian-heicklen/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723115811/http://www.empirestatenews.net/News/20100426-3.html to http://www.empirestatenews.net/News/20100426-3.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100607043733/http://www.wfmz.com:80/news/23797465/detail.html to http://www.wfmz.com/news/23797465/detail.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:58, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Fully Informed Jury Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120309075653/http://dev.fija.org/2010/06/11/freedom-friday-lunch-break-for-liberty-online-3/ to http://dev.fija.org/2010/06/11/freedom-friday-lunch-break-for-liberty-online-3/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://jailedactivist.info/activists/julian-heicklen/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wfmz.com/news/23797465/detail.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:52, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This section is flagged as having its neutrality disputed.. There is no discussion on the talk page, and the section does not appear to me to be not in accordance with NPOV. Therefore, I've removed the template message Firejuggler86 (talk) 08:21, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  template message on "Julian Haeklin" section 

message: The lede contains phrases that include "he or she". This language is transphobic since there are according to mainstream media at least 67 genders. Should the article be edited for inclusivity? Henry Hannon (talk) 17:39, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Binary pronouns