lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Air Scouts

message: I am suggesting that article Air Scout be merged into this article and then Air Scout changed into a redirect to here. Air Scout is entirely about Air Scouts in the UK while this article is more international with details about Air Scouts in the USA and South Africa. The two names are very confusing, so if consensus is to leave them, I think some name changes will be required. 
Please add you comments on this page and not the talk page for Air Scout. Thanks. --Bduke 10:06, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree Merge them, will give the articles a more accurate representation of what Air Scouting is about. Jediwannabe 11:24, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Agree so I input what I know very well about Air Scouting in Hong Kong to correct the bias of talking " entirely about Air Scouts in the UK"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Airscoutmaster (talk • contribs) 03:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Information is also needed on Korea, and Hong Kong needs cleaned up. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 09:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Korea/Hong Kong

message: I have cut back this section for several reasons. It gives undue weight to one association, and the material is already at the Scout Association of Hong Kong article. More importantly the material looks to be a direct copy of the minutes cited as a reference. This is also an unacceptable reference since it is not generally available in libraries, however localised, or on the web. The material was also largely not encyclopedic. This section still needs some work to make it into a clear and concise summary of Air Scouts in Hong Kong. I suggest that the section in the Scout Association of Hong Kong be cleaned up also, but that could go into more details than the section on Hong Kong here. --Bduke  (Discussion) 23:55, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This material has been added back twice now by the same editor, with no reasons given that address the above concerns. I am not the only editor who has reverted these changes, so anyone who disagrees with us should discuss it here and address the above concerns. --Bduke  (Discussion) 00:25, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hong Kong
Talk:Thomas Ice

message: I certainly have no sympathy for unaccredited, religious schools, but Rossnixon suggested, I believe, that the accreditation status of an institution claimed or cited as included in the educational experience of a biographical article can be obtained by reading the linked-to article.  I think that's a good point and I agree.  It doesn't seem useful and, indeed, it seems to clutter articles, if we list every unaccredited institution as such in articles about evangelicals. Christians, especially, have created some sort of cottage industry when it comes to creating unaccredited religious schools that are really just degree mills of some sort.  The more I read these articles at Wikipedia, the more convinced I am that making a point of this issue over and over again is completely unnecessary, especially when we can go to the institution's page at Wikipedia and read that for ourselves.  - Nascentatheist 04:29, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accreditation citations in biographical articles 

message: I don't have access to this journal, but apparently Raymond O. Zorn reviewed Dominion Theology: Blessing or Curse? in the November 1989 issue of Vox Reformata (pages 52–54). gnu57 05:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional reference
Talk:Hoeryong

message: It's excellent that the article spells out all variants of the city's name. However, the Daily NK uses yet another version: "Hoiryeong" and this already exists as a redirect. But what version of romanization is that? --LA2 (talk) 12:53, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romanization 
Talk:Minatec

message: * I removed this dead external link: http://www.time.com/time/europe/secret/grenoble.html per WP:ELNO. That article may be useful as a source for this article, although it was written in 2004.
* I removed some promotional language, but I'll leave the  template up since I think the article could still benefit from a more balanced coverage of the topic. Please feel free to remove that template once the article no longer seems like an advertisement. 
Inverted Hourglass (talk) 14:37, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  July 2021 comments
Talk:Marvin Thompson (disambiguation)

message: In July 2021, Marvin Thompson is not mentioned on the page Gloucester City A.F.C., so this redirect serves no purpose. There are several other people of that name, including the poet I have just stub-sorted, so I am creating a disambiguation page. There are no incoming links at present, beyond the AfD discussion. PamD 14:09, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Note on creation of dab page over redirect
Talk:Ḍād

message: The title of this article does not display correctly on my computer. Is there a simpler name it could be given? Or is that the only way it can be written? --Do Not Talk About Feitclub (contributions) 11:47, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you, the letters are not accessible on most computers, and definatly one that is searching for the letter...
i suggest calling the page "Daud"
Arab League User (talk) 11:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This alternate description was found in an Arabic instruction book: "voiced velarized alveolar stop." Is it correct? Badagnani (talk) 22:29, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phonetic description 

message: I am not sure that Dappa is pronounced the same as Arabic Dad. The phonetic transcription for Dappa (Sappa) is ɬˁ while that for Dad is dˁ. These are different sounds. Hakeem.gadi (talk) 08:21, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ge'ez Dappa

message: This is not correct -- Arabic took 21 letters (ס was not borrowed), and from the Aramaic alphabet (not directly from Phoenician). AnonMoos (talk) 00:12, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "one of the six letters the Arabic alphabet added to the twenty-two inherited from the Phoenician alphabet"

message: The article calls the letter "Ḍād, or ṣ́ād" in the first sentence. It then goes on to say that it is a variant of ṣ́ād. Is it a variant or just ṣ́ād? Deuter|anopia 21:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Ḍ and ṣ́ are actually two ways of representing (romanization) the same Arabic phoneme. If we want to emphasize its peculiar ancient value (phonetic realization) that still preserves in South Arabic, then we write ṣ́. Else, if we want to represent one of two wide-spread modern pronunciation, we write ḍ (emphatic d). Actually, as many modern dialects show it may as well be represented in a third way with ḏ̣ (that is emphatic ḏāl [ð]). From the graphical point of view this letter is a modification (a dot is added above) of the letter ṣād (note there is no acute accent above), but apart from the graphic these two letters/phonemes are not related etymologically. --Lüboslóv Yęzýkin (talk) 11:51, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ṣ́ād
Talk:Man with a Movie Camera (The Cinematic Orchestra album)

message: The article states
   "The album contains re-workings and thematic reprises of some of the music from their previous album EveryDay" (2002)
and
  "The Cinematic Orchestra were commissioned to record the score to play as the opening event in Porto, Portugal's year as European Capital of Culture in 2001.
The first live performance took place in the Coliseu do Porto theatre in May 2000 and was met with a standing ovation from the audience of more than 3,500 people. The tracks from the album have since been performed at film festivals all over the world.
In November 2002, the band, along with a string section and percussionist Milo Fell, recorded the album over a 2 day period in the soundtrack studio in Whitfield Street in London."
How is a score that was written & performed in 2000 , but not put on cd until 2003 have music from an album in 2002 ?
Unless they invented a time machine, it would be better stated that EveryDay contains recordings of these songs as well.  Every Day was written/released after this score - its a 'to cd' issue, not a 'performed' one.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.131.209.2 (talk) 22:51, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This makes no sense 

message: Merge. Totally agree, so I've gone ahead and lifted most of the additional info from Man With The Movie Camera (album) into this one (lower case "with the"), and expanded on it a little. If the merge is agreed, all that remains is to (possibly) copy the See Also and External Links section to here and turn Man With The Movie Camera (album) into a redirect.   Gram 11:50, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Alan Campbell (pastor)

message: Briefly, it's enormous; it's surely much too long for an encyclopaedia article, and it unbalances the article (shifting it away from a neutral pioint of view).  Could someone cut it down?  I'll try if no-one else can, but someone who knows more about the subject might be able to do a better job. --Phronima 11:52, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotations section

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[?]
*There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City.[?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
*If this article is about a person, please add  along with the required parameters to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information.[?]
*This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 1(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.[?]
*There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
**apparently
**might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[?] 
*Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
**Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant -  “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
*Avoid using contractions like: didn't.
*This article needs footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Simply, enclose inline citations, with WP:CITE or WP:CITE/ES information, with THE FOOTNOTE. At the bottom of the article, in a section named “References” or “Footnotes”, add .[?]
*The article will need references. See WP:CITE and WP:V for more information.[?]
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Mal 10:35, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Auto peer review

message: When Alan Campbell talks on Sabbath, him is talking on Sunday, no on Saturday.
Fundamentalist Calvinists as Him or Paisley considers Sunday as Sabbath from Christians.
Eliecer Guillen.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.75.114.156 (talk) 19:42, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sabbath is Sunday in Calvinist Circles
Talk:The Zeta Project

message: What about making two article named The Zeta Project episodes (Season 1) and The Zeta Project episodes (Season 2) merging the single episodes in only two articles? --Melaen 11:57, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Episodes

message: Any Link with the movie the Iron Giant?  Similar story.  Also a warner bros property.
Doubt it.Darrik2 01:05, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Iron Giant?
Talk:Superbrands

message: One of the sources discussed in the April 2021 AfD discussion was a Sunday Times article from 2006. Having had the opportunity to look at a scan of the original page today, this is clearly not an independent source as it is part of a supplement that states it is produced "in association with Superbrands", and each page has a header either mentioning "Superbrands" or "Promotion." However, knowing this earlier wouldn't have affected my keep vote. Pinging ,   and  to let them know. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 16:01, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note on a 2006 Sunday Times source
Category talk:Wikipedians in South Africa

message: Where do I add my name then?
--NatovR 06:46, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Category:South African Wikipedians   Buaidh  talk contribs 05:56, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: What if I'm not in South Africa, but was born there?
Talk:Open politics

message: The concepts of open politics and open source politics are mostly the same, therefore I suggest to merge the definitions. Guy West Gywst 12:07, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

message: A new form of democracy was proposed and publicly debated
this month (August 2007). Two institutions were proposed:
1) open electoral system; and 2) open legislature.
For details and references,
see: Talk:Participatory_democracy#Open_institution_democracy.
I am wondering, should we describe this on Wikipedia? And where, exactly? --Michael Allan 15:46, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Open institution democracy

message: There were a lot of contradictions within this article about what "open politics" means. At its heart, the idea seems to be that of a community of people making political decisions together, using the internet. The Howard Dean campaign was not an example of open politics - there was a lot of online communication, but none of it was used to affect the political platform: I don't believe Dean ever asked his supporters what his stance should be on some political issue. DKosopedia, SourceWatch and Wikipedia aren't examples of open politics either - they produce information collaboratively, but not decisions. I tried to remove what I thought were irrelevant examples. I also tried to remove personal opinions (who says that wikis are good for "open politics" but blogs aren't?) some irrelevant stuff about Green Party lawsuits, and external links - some were broken, and some were about "open source politics" - if these two concepts are different (I don't know if they are), then those links don't belong here. Yaron K. (talk) 14:42, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article was a mess 

message: I think they should be merged, they pretty much cover most of the same material.--205.153.101.8 (talk) 17:57, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. They should be merged. Miloshd7 (talk) 11:52, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with Open source governance
Talk:Layered intrusion

message: Merged ultramafic layered intrusion in here; this is a broader categorisation. Not all layered intrusions are ultramafic, after all. Rolinator 12:07, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Am I the only one who thinks the name of this article is odd? It is too complex and not used in geological literature. I believe the term Layered intrusion is both simple and unambiguous. It is also commonly used and would thus be much better name for this article. The fact that this page is named in plural from is also inconsistent with typical article naming in Wikipedia. Sorsanmetsastaja (talk) 15:21, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, much simpler and most layered intrusions are mafic to ultramafic anyway. So I did it ... thought about it before, so you just prompted me to go ahead and do it. Vsmith (talk) 23:47, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for moving the article. I've been pondering the name of this article since long time ago, but only now got the kick to propose the new name. Sorsanmetsastaja (talk) 17:13, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: shouldn't it be plural intrusions ? --Christian b219 (talk) 23:16, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems logical ... but Wiki style guides sorta insist on singular titles, unless they've changed 'em recently :) Vsmith (talk) 02:01, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename this article 

message: — Assignment last updated by ChloejWard (talk) 03:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ERTH 4303 Resources of the Earth
Talk:Paul Roos (Australian rules footballer)

message: There must be more than one Paul Roos. He cannot have been the first Springbok captain.
a) He'd be dead by now as he'd have to be about 130 years old.
b) The article says he's an Aussie AFL player.GordyB 12:20, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:RedBoot

message: I put it in :Category:Boot loader. I hope it's correct. If not please fix it.--Amir E. Aharoni 12:24, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Category - boot loader

message: See
http://coldattic.info/post/86/
and
https://www.quora.com/What-hardware-software-and-network-topology-powers-Virgin-Americas-in-flight-entertainment-system
, though these are both from 2012. Peterhull90 (talk) 07:54, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Use on Aeroplanes
Talk:Bill Anschell

message: On July 14, 2006, User:Bobj7 added Joseph Patrick Moore to the introductory paragraph of this article.  On the same day, User:Ryulong removed the reference.  I strongly agree with the removal.  While it is true that Anschell has recorded with Moore, to list Moore as a ‘top jazz player’ along the lines of Lionel Hampton and Nnenna Freelon is extremely inappropriate.Cynrin 14:33, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Joseph Patrick Moore
Talk:Mausoleum of Princess Jeonghyo

message: It says:"The 105-metre-high [underground!] chamber is rectangular: 50 × 26-m, and is covered with blue-green bricks. It contains a 1.05-metre tall, 0.58 × 0.26-m epitaph ...." - these can't be right! 10.5 high, or 1.05 ? 5.0 x 2.6 m ?  I have reduced all by a factor of 10, pending confirmation. Johnbod (talk) 21:16, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  measurements
Talk:Sunchon

message: The provided coordinates for the city center point to the middle of a field. I believe they are supposed to be moved somewhat to the west, but I'm not certain. Maury Markowitz (talk) 11:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad coords 
Talk:Dromore, County Tyrone

message: The History and Townlands of Dromore sections look like they are copied directly from somewhere, and therefore are copyvio. I can't find the source though. Unless I'm convinced otherwise, I'm going to delete them. Stu 12:55, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed the references to the Post Office and added a link to the source site (dromore.info).
I am slightly concerned by the bias of the aforementioned site and would therefore discourage its use as a source - but as few other sites give an in depth of the village, it'll have to do. 
Don't take offence if I've changed anything but it whole 'address changing' affair was a bit one-sided.
Denzell393 (talk) 16:41, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality? 
Talk:Kensington Roof Gardens

message: Why is this in the category nightclubs in london? -- Astrokey44|talk 13:00, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps because the article states that they are "run as a restaurant and nightclub"? -- Karada 13:04, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Club?

message: The article states that the English Woodland garden has "over 100 species of trees," but then states: "There are over 30 different species of trees in the woodland garden." I'm guessing it is meant to read "over 100 trees", but as I don't know anything about the roof gardens I don't feel qualified to change it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.27.33.185 (talk) 14:26, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error? 

message: Should there be some mention of "Derry & Toms Roof Garden" appearing in Michael Moorcock's Jerry Cornelius novels?
AdamFunk (talk) 18:39, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: My 2p: if there is, it should be in our page on those books, not here – this is trivia which adds nothing to our understanding of the topic in hand. Many places are mentioned in many books – what would our articles on Westminster Abbey or Hyde Park look like if we listed every trivial passing mention? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:07, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

text: I guess if an "In popular section" appears (justified by other references), it would be appropriate to include it. AdamFunk (talk) 10:51, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture
Talk:John Wesley Hardin

message: There is no mention of the Bob Dylan Song, "John Wesley Hardin" from his 1967 album of the same name. This important cultural reference should be inserted into the section marked "Legacy."
Entry on the song itself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Wesley_Harding_(song)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ptbates1 (talk • contribs) 16:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: How could we have missed the Dylan song? I've added it, and improved the other musical mentions, at the article. Dhtwiki (talk) 22:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

text: The Dylan song is spelled "John Wesley Harding" with a "g". The recording company made an error and didn't notice before most of the 1st run of the record was already printed, so they decided to let it stand. 62.107.173.13 (talk) 10:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Omission: No Mention of Bob Dylan Song
Talk:Valaquenta

message: *I have removed the  tag which proposed that this article be deleted, because I think that this article has merit and so should not be deleted from Wikipedia. I'm leaving this message here as notification. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the  template back to the article as that process is only to be used when there is no opposition. Warden (talk) 22:47, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not sure how folks feel about the 'notes' interspersed within the synopsis.  I put them in because I thought they were useful, especially as Valaquenta is otherwise one of the more 'biblical' stories - along with the discussions of land and language, it can give some readers the 'leviticus-numbers' heebee jeebees.  The notes seek to aid the reader in connecting Valaquenta and its contents with the larger, better known episodes of Middle-earth history. At any rate, I am interested to see what others think.  Black Thorn of Brethil 13:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For the most part, it's useful information, although it should be integrated more smoothly into the rest of the article.  I'll see what I can do when I have more time.  --DachannienTalkContrib 06:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:CDM

message: ----
Clean development mechanism has by far the highest number of google hits of any of the CDM ambiguations. As of January 2006, CDM for clean development mechanism got more than 340,000 phrase hits, about four times that of the competitor cold dark matter. I'll try to make the clean development mechanism default, and have a disambiguation link on that page. Jens Nielsen 13:17, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Cadbury's Dairy Milk
Cervejas de Moçambique, a brewery in Mozambique affiliated with SABMiller
* Content Decryption Module, a software component that permits access to encrypted resources
* Central Defending Midfielder
* Centre Defensive Midfielder a position in football popularised by the FIFA games, also known as a holding midfielder
* Demand management Customer Demand Management
Widefox; talk 12:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed