Talk:LG Voyager

message: You might ask, where are pictures of Voyager?  Lots of other web sites have them.  The problem is, most of those other web sites are violating Verizon's copyright on the pictures.
Wikipedia needs permission from Verizon before we can use their pictures.  I've contacted Verizon's media rep.  She replied back, but as with any large corporation it might take a while for a definitive answer.  If it takes too long, we can buy the phone in November and take pictures of it ourselves. Egumtow 18:51, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: I think it's clear how much this article sounds like an advertisement. I'm adding the tag, if anyone disagrees they can discuss it here. Fatla00 (talk) 05:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement 

message: Now that it is released, there should be a reception section added, and a section to deal with the iphone since it has been labeled as competition for the iphone.--ZeWrestler  Talk 18:02, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections needed 

message: dsgadsgdsgwith a new Two Year Agreement or $469 without.  I'm not familiar with how Wikipedia articles on cell phones are usually written, so I'm not sure how to go about changing this (if it's even needed).  TheUncleBob (talk) 18:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the only way to work it in appropriately would be in a comparison to competing products or to other phones in te LG/VZ lines.  BTW, the $299 is correct, but it is officially $349 with a $50 mail-in rebate.  Mdeaton (talk) 22:51, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Now its $99.99 with a 2-year contract and a $50 mail-in rebate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.125.181.131 (talk) 21:02, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Price 

message: I work at a store that sells Alltel and Verizon and I can assure you, a lot of people know about this phone.  Is it any less notable than the EnV or most of the other phones listed on Template:LG phones?  How does one determine if a phone is "notable" or not?  I'm probably not the one to make this decision, as I'd cut off my big toe for this phone...  TheUncleBob 21:01, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't it customary on Wikipedia to have the person that proposed deletion come argue their point. Without any counter argument I say keep, so I guess it's already 2 to 0 for keep.Penman 1323 22:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I posted the question to the user who put the template up on the article here. My vote is to have this phone stay. But granted, this article is going to need an overhaul. --ZeWrestler  Talk 22:21, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

text: *Also, don't forget to voice your opinion at the delete keep vote. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LG Voyager (VX10000)--ZeWrestler  Talk 00:52, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-notable cellular phone? 

message: http://comparati.com/890-LG-Voyager-vs-iPhone might be a useful reference for this article. Also there is http://www.homotron.net/2007/12/voyager_becomes_most_shopped_p.html --ZeWrestler  Talk 22:59, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparrison with iphone 

message: Where are you getting that it costs $150-$250?  I'm pretty sure that it costs $300.  I'll look it up in a sec and if it isn't true, i'll change it... 67.86.126.40 (talk) 21:46, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Price?

message: The Voyager is not the sucessor or replacing the enV. The enV is going to have a small upgrade to it, which will be the VX9950. I changed the wording to fix this problem.--71.232.229.186 (talk) 00:31, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: enV Confusion

message: Is the VX10000 really a smartphone? I mean, it runs the same (crippled) OS as all the other Verizon phones, it doesn't allow installation of new apps in the same way most other smartphones do, and I don't believe it supports any kind of synchronization at all. Like the iPhone, I think it's questionable whether or not this can be called a smartphone. It's hardly on the level of Windows Mobile, BlackBerry OS, Symbian S60/UIQ, or even Palm OS. A phone with a keyboard and touch screen, yes, it is. Smartphone, no it isn't. Zirka (talk) 16:19, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, go to a Verizon store and see your yourself. 24.218.147.30 (talk) 22:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOT a Smartphone 

message: I went through and fixed a few, most notably the Voyager Titanium section, where it talks about the Voyager Refresh in both present and past tense. Also, the latest firmware release is V11 (it's currently being released on the Titaniums). I can't make it show up in that sidebar thing >:O  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.21.182.30 (talk) 01:59, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has anybody noticed the many grammatical errors? 

message: this phone fails in every way possible END OF STORY  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.157.78.173 (talk) 17:54, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAIL 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on LG Voyager. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20080821133127/http://comparati.com/890-LG-Voyager-vs-iPhone to http://comparati.com/890-LG-Voyager-vs-iPhone
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:55, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified