lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Laredo, Spain

message: Does Laredo translate to something or was it named for somebody? Thanks --Jolomo 23:57, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation? 

message: Apart from the poor English of the article, surely the sentence about the beach being 5km , but 7km at high tide is incorrect? –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:28, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: query
Talk:Santander, Spain

message: Paella as typical from Santander? who wrote this??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.64.72.225 (talk) 16:19, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Paella]] 

message: Time ago, people of Wikipedia in Spanish looked upon naming this article as "Santander (España)". They finally did so, because there're not other Spanish cities with the same name. Due to it, I think it would be a good idea to name the English article as "Santander, Spain".--81.44.174.192 (talk) 13:04, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I was thinking this when I came to read the article. I would support a move.--Cymru123 (talk) 15:34, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the title 

message: The caption for the image in the info box seems to be incorrect, describing a different image. The image has 9 different photos, but the caption describes only 6 different photos.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.34.183.7 (talk) 17:48, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with info box photo description 

message: The current version of this article doesn't seem to explain the etymology/origin of the word "Santander." This is a serious omission, especially as anyone visiting this article might expect to find this information here. Please add this basic information, in order to help make this article more properly encyclopedic. 98.123.38.211 (talk) 02:28, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serious omission
Talk:Senhor

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 06:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: Senhor is a central honorific in the Portuguese Language, it deserves an article, such as Don (honorific), Dom (title), Sir, Lord, Gentleman, Monsieur or Mr.. Removed the notability tag. 62.169.97.148 13:42, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Raymond Martini

message: Why "Ramón Martí" instead of "Ramon Martí", as his name is spelled in Catalan, Martí's language.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.59.138.247 (talk) 17:22, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: About:
" ... and proves the falsity of the Jewish religion ..."
Doesn't Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy require that we write not "proves," but "endeavors to prove"?
Toddcs (talk) 17:12, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "... and proves the falsity of..."
Talk:Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua

message: The respect to the culture and the opinion of a community is the base of all knowledge. An encyclopedia and any person who boasts to defend the culture must fight by this.
Over any discussion with innumerable reasons it is the objective truth, and in this case it is that the Valencians never have felt nor feel Catalan. Any attempt to impose the opposite will be incorrect.  Any attempt to put to the Valencians in a community (linguistic, cultural or political) under denomination of "Catalan" it will mean the elimination of a people and a culture. The Valencians have their own history as kingdom of Valencia (before the conquest of Jaume I already the Kingdom of Valencia even existed), its own Literature (innumerable examples, to only mention some: Ausias March and Joanot Martorell), its own traditions (that are not those of Catalonia), Its own culture (in all the scopes, that she is not Catalan), its own control systems (they are not a province of Catalonia and it has never formed part of no organization or Catalan nation) and its own language (of origin different from the Catalan language –provençal- with category of official language and the conscience of its speakers to speak "Valencian", independently of which it is looked like the Catalan).
If the Valencians never have tried to absorve the culture of Catalonia, nor to distort the history of Catalonia, nor, really to eliminate Catalonia like independent reality of Valencia, why the Catalans yes do all this, and they do not respect the Valencians?
: Blah blah blah, blah blah blah, blah blah blah. Citation needed, man. This is not a chat; please provide references to your assertions. I'm Valencian and I assure most of them are false. Period.
It is frequent to find texts in which Valencia is included within the “Catalan Countries”, nevertheless I want to correct this error of political origin (Catalan nationalism) so generalized. The Kingdom of Valencia never has belonged to any “Catalan Countries”. The Valencian culture cannot be described like “Catalan”, because these two cultures are different and have diverse origins (the Kingdom of Valencia exists from before the conquest of Jaume I). Really, the Valencians are not “Catalan” in any aspect; its history, language and culture do not have to be distorted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.79.86.158 (talk) 19:27, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catalonia and Valencia
Talk:Algherese dialect

message: My apologies to the rest of the community. It seems I have messed up the article, though all I tried to do was insert a reference. I have tried to fix it but failed. Can somebody help? Unoffensive text or character 14:58, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I'm not against having an Interwiki, but it should state that it is a link to the Catalan wiki not to the "Alguerese" wiki (which doesn't exist).
BNS  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.49.241.227 (talk) 12:43, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Interwiki

message: * Simple Past Perfect has been replaced by Present Perfect (present of HAVER + past participle), possibly due to Italian influence. 
There's no such thing as a "simple past perfect".  Tenses in a simple aspect have one verb only, perfect tenses have verb+participle.
I'm assuming what is meant here is "past simple", aka "preterite", as this is the only logical explanation for the phrase "possibly due to Italian influence".
The past perfect is "he had done". It's not Italian-like to say "he has done" instead of "he had done", and I don't believe that this happens in alguerés.
82.41.42.2 (talk) 15:43, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simple past perfect...? 

message: Why "Algherese dialect" and not just "Algherese"? The status of the lect as language or dialect would therefore not be explicit in the title, and any disagreement could be dealt with in the article. Prof Wrong (talk) 21:46, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I know, nobody considers Algherese a separate language. --Jotamar (talk) 13:52, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: Being a Catalan dialect and not an Italian dialect, why is the dialect's name spelled with Italian orthography in this article? It's "alguerès" in Catalan.--62.57.72.234 (talk) 23:47, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Algherese vs. Alguerese 
Talk:Institut d'Estudis Catalans

message: ==Untitled==
I don't know what are the politics of wikipedia about the name of Spain. But I think that "Kindom of Spain" is not usual. As spanish, I never use the form "Kingdom of Spain". --Jose piratilla (talk) 01:05, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spain 

message: I don't know what are the politics of wikipedia about the name of Spain. But I think that "Kindom of Spain" is not usual. As spanish, I never use the form "Kingdom of Spain". --Jose piratilla (talk) 01:05, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: mege to page for main organization  DGG ( talk ) 21:59, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Societat Catalana de Terminologia]]
Talk:Fossar de les Moreres

message: Excuse my poor understanding of Catalan, I gather the inscription to read:
In the Moat of the Fallen, no traitors are buried. Though the banners of honor are lost, this place honors the heros of 1714.
Please someone correct and put in the article. Group29 17:20, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Inscription
Talk:Fulcoald of Rouergue

message: Go here to see a discussion on what we actually know and what we don't about her.  Medlands is not reliable for this connection. Wjhonson 15:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: His wife
Talk:Tarzan's Desert Mystery

message: The scene with the giant spider in the subterranean cave system resembles the scene with Frodo, Sam and Shelob in the the Ring- trilogy of Tolkien. This film was made before the book. Perhaps this scene did inspire Tolkien?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.130.31.203 (talk) 09:28, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did the scene with the giant spider perhaps inspire JRR Tolkien?
Talk:Commonwealth of Catalonia

message: Mancomunitat de Catalunya → Commonwealth of Catalonia
Proposing more to generate discussion than to advocate usage of the English translation.  Is the current title the most appropriate in English? —  AjaxSmack    08:00, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" or other opinion in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
#Support We should use English when we can.--Aldux 12:20, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:St. Florian's Church

message: This article, whose subject is currently referred to here as "St. Florian Church," may properly be given either of the two titles quoted in the heading.  The situation parallels that of the Basilica of St. Peter, in Rome, more commonly known in English as "St. Peter's Basilica" — but never as "St. Peter Basilica."
"St. Florian Church" falls clumsily between the two stools, and is not a satisfactory English title.  logologist|Talk 06:29, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with User:logologist. Even though, the name "St. Florian Church" is being used by travel.yahoo.com, virtualtourist.com (see caption), wikitravel.org, and Saint Florian Parish in Hamtramck, MI, the title of the article "St. Florian Church" does not seem to follow the established conventions. Please rename to St. Florian's Church. Thanks. --Poeticbent  talk  15:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved to St. Florian's Church (no need to have Krakow in the article name, unless we start getting multiple articles on various St. Florian's Churches). Proto::► 23:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Church of St. Florian," or "St. Florian's Church"
Talk:Prince of Girona

message: Was she ever considered Princess of Girona? She was recognized as heir reluctantly by Aragon but it never said if she was created Princess of Girona. Also she had a half-brother born in 1509 that was Prince of Girona for a few hours before he died.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 00:52, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joanna of Castile 

message: I removed this sentence : "Three other titles represent the other Kingdoms within the Crown of Aragon: the heir of the Crown of Aragon was Prince of Girona (Aragon), Duke of Montblanc (Catalonia), Count of Cervera (Valencia) and Lord of Balaguer (Mallorca)."
This is complete crap : Girona, Montblanc, Cervera and Balaguer are alls cities in Catalonia. The Duchy of Montblanc was created as a second-son title in 1387 (Girona was not a principality until 141) and united to the Girona title in 1461, when the infant Ferran, duke of Montblanc and second son of King John II inherited his older brother's title.78.232.54.121 (talk) 11:59, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction 

message: Is the wife of the Prince of Gerona also called Princess of Gerona?187.73.191.2 (talk) 23:53, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Title of the consort of the Prince of Gerona
Talk:Zachary Mudge

message: A couple of the links need to be cleaned up. Also there's a painting of this fellow, according to the .gov link. It's interesting to think that if he had been just a little quicker with his promotion, he might have headed the Vancouver expedition & the cities of Vancouver might be named "Mudge" rewinn 06:31, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start

message: According to the Mudge Island Wikipedia article, and webpage, it was named for another Mudge, William Fitzwilliam Mudge.  Perhaps a relative? Pustelnik (talk) 01:54, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Great question. Zachary had an older brother William...maybe it was he? I'll have to research further~! rewinn (talk) 22:43, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just stumbled across this page, wandering links related to George Vancouver etc -- checked  and found it says: "William T.F. Mudge was a great-nephew of Lieutenant Zachary Mudge, with Vancouver's expedition". Added ref to Mudge Island page. Btw, was Puget Sound really almost named for Mudge? How much is "almost"? I'm curious now -- and thankful it's Puget and not Mudge Sound, whew! Pfly (talk) 00:09, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh! Mudge was senior to Puget, so it would have been possible for him to be in charge of the explorations south of Admiralty Inlet. Was it mere chance, was it just Puget's turn, or was Puget better at handling small boats? We may never know; perhaps it's just as well ;-) rewinn (talk) 04:00, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mudge Island
Talk:Blood Alley

message: I don't know if its worthwhile to mention in a trivia section, but John Wayne's guest appearance on I Love Lucy was peppered with plugs for the movie.
(quotes not literal)
:"Hey Mr. Wayne, does this gigantic poster for Blood Alley suffice for a final print?"
:"Sure Charlie."
:"Sure I'll imprint my shoes, but I'm going to be late for the premiere of my latest movie, Blood Alley."
LostCause 05:59, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Bit of Trivia 

message: Seeing that the real Bloody Alley was in Shanghai, it could be that Vancouver's was named for it; the name was established by 1870, for a back lane behind the original gaol (still standing as a part of a restaurant) and has city street-signage today.  it's the alley between Water and Cordova Streets, running between Carrall and Abbott; and I think it may also be the name of a building on its north side.Skookum1 (talk) 23:10, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Another Blood Alley in Vancouver

message: By season five of I Love Lucy, it wasn't unusual for the show to have a multi episode arc. 125.253.96.174 (talk) 06:11, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lucy reference 
Talk:Comarcal council

message: CONSELL COMARCAL NO SABEU K ES HOME K ESTEM A LA WIKIPEDIA!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.42.103.102 (talk) 17:33, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Arthur Henry Reginald Buller

message: Think it's "She set out one day"... AnonMoos (talk) 13:47, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: limerick

message: " ...he received a Bachelor of Science from Queen's College, Taunton in 1896". - There were very few degree-awarding bodies at the time, and that wasn't one of them! Norvo (talk) 01:43, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for changing that. Norvo (talk) 23:21, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Degree from Queen's College, Taunton!?!?
Talk:Girona Cathedral

message: The most beateaful building in Girona  is the cathedral  . It was a Romanesque building which was redesigned by Pere Sacoma in 1312 It’s very big. It’s in the centre of the city , in the old area in the city.It has the most big nave of old the world .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.14.85.157 (talk) 08:02, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Albert Rivera

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 10:19, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]]

message: The info box section "Member of the Catalan Parliament" includes correctly an initiation date and a final date. What is the reason for the presence of the wrong information "In office"?--Auró (talk) 23:28, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info box question
Talk:Shovelbum

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 06:45, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: There is content at Shovel Bum which simply describes shovelbum in publications/trivia.  The page is just disambiguation of 3 publications.  I suggest that that content should be merged here.  Viv Hamilton 12:28, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge tag
Talk:Charm bracelet

message: Isn't that a bit spammish?  Would a similar photo without the brand name be available?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Luckydraws (talk • contribs) 14:00, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You can see the brand in the photo. I guess it's just being honest. I just tried to upload my own photo of a traditional style bracelet on Commons. Doesn't seem to be working. I guess I just have to wait for the image to have it's copyright verified? I picked the public domain license. I've never uploaded and tried to add a picture so fast. Maybe it's better to wait? Mabsal (talk) 21:28, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to me that the Pandora folks are spamming several articles, including this one, which contains far too much coverage of their "Italian Charm Bracelet" product.  —Mark Dominus (talk) 22:53, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo of Pandora bracelet 
Talk:Democratic Convergence of Catalonia

message: The whole ideology section is in need of updating. Since November 2012, the party has shifted to explicit defense of self-determination, and has been advocating a sovereign Catalan state, and has been openly considering (in more veiled terms) secession from Spain. As it stands now, the section is obsolete. There's no need to name those leaders / members of the party who are openly pro-independence, as now the whole party has adopted their view. Nevertheless, rather than just re-write the section in the light of the recent changes, the evolution from previous positions should be described. Viator slovenicus (talk) 02:00, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideology and policies section 

message: Should the name really be translated into English? For example, on the Catalan wikipedia, would one talk about (for example) "Plaid Cymru" or "el Partit de Gal·les"? Would one talk about "l'UMP (Union pour la Majorité Presidentielle)" or "l'UMP (Unió per la Majoritat Presidencial)"? I've yet to see many articles about the "Peoples' Party (Spain)", "We Can" or "Citizens", but yet "United Left" and "Spanish Workers' Socialist Party" appear to be in use...
My rationale for this is that I would always refer to "Carrer Balmes" rather than "Balmes Street", to "Poblenou" rather than "New Town" and to the "Eixample" rather than the "Expansion" - but then, I might be biased, so want to hear alternative points of view!
This is meant to be the start of a discussion rather than anything else... Please add to the discussion :)
If the result of this is that names shouldn't be translated, I'd recommend that this page me moved to "Convergència Democràtica de Catalunya", and (for example) "Initiative for Catalonia - Greens" be moved to "Iniciativa per Catalunya - Verds"... edd (talk) 21:01, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of the name
Talk:El Coll

message: The English section looks like an automated translation. Some paragraphs do not make any sense and some are grammatically incorrect. Eyaloson (talk) 23:02, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The English is looks like an automated translation. Some paragraphs do not make any sense and some are grammatically incorrect
Talk:Flabiol

message: I have just had my image of the range of the flabiol removed because it did not have a copyright status.  I am happy with that, I made a mistake, so therefore I have just uploaded the same image again, making sure it has the correct public domain status.  This is shown in the table in the image page showing this new version there dated 7 December 2008.  However, when I now go and look at the Flabiol page, nothing has changed, it is the image dated 23 November which was my first attempt - where I forget to put the copyright status in!  I dont know what I can do - it looks as if I have ignored the warning about the copyright, but I have not intentionally.  In fact I have tried this many times as you see, because the table of versions of the file now has 6 versions since 23 November up to to 7 December.  It did remind me it was a duplicate file and I'm sure I said OK use the duplicate.P0mbal (talk) 19:54, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image:Range of Flabiol, uploading a new version 

message: There is a need for a photo of the modern keyed flabiol. P0mbal (talk) 11:18, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of modern keyed flabiol
Talk:Vincent-Marie Viénot, Count of Vaublanc

message: Made a semi automatic javascript peer review of this article.  If it is a FAC it should not also be a good article nominee.  As it is at B class - the article should probably have a peer review, then good article nomination, then FAC.  Good luck with your article!  SriMesh | talk 21:35, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Automated/September 2007]]

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  Develop (Expand) lead and address FAC comments b (MoS):   Address semi automatic peer reviewer check list of problems as listed above and at FAC.
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  Again as per notes in FAC b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#:a (tagged and captioned):  b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
#Overall: 
#:a Pass/Fail: 
*Check the what links here page for a possible additional section entitled See also which could provide internal wiki links to articles on this subject.
*Reduce the amount of red links referred to in the body of the article.  - Create these articles yourself, to help this article achieve a higher status.  
Good luck with your article!  SriMesh | talk 21:58, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations]] Good article review
Talk:Fibre reinforced concrete

message: As far as my knowledge is concerned the exact definition of volume fraction is " Ratio of the weight of fiber per unit volume of the matrix to the unit weight of fiber expressed in percentage". e.g. if we say volume fraction of 1% for steel fiber, it means 78.5kg of steel fiber in 1cum matrix volume. Is not it correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.212.8.62 (talk • contribs) 06:57, February 9, 2007
- This page should be joined with the page on Fiber reinforced concrete Blabbermouth01 14:49, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Volume fraction definition