Talk:The Tatler (1709 journal)

message: someone please tell me how to pronounce the name of this magazine - is it taytler of tattler???
can someone put a picture of the front page up?  I can't work out how to do it ...
*The connection with Sir Richard Steele's Tatler papers made here is preposterous: the magazine itself makes no such claim, though I haven't thumbed it in decades.  As far as being aristocratic now, it's simply Celebrity Lifestyles presented in a Harper's Bazaar format. --Wetman 08:32, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: :Image:Beatricetatler.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Beatricetatler.jpg

message: :Image:Beatricetatler.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Beatricetatler.jpg

message: Do the Asian Tatler editions have anything to do with the London-based Condé Nast title? If so, this should be made clear; if not, they should be placed under the heading of "Unrelated Tatlers".Matthau (talk) 05:03, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Asian Tatlers?

message: Is it known why it has always been Tatler rather than the more obvious "Tattler"? Varlaam (talk) 15:19, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tattler 

message: This Tatler has no connection to the original Tatler, so perhaps this should be "Tatler (1901)" or something similar? Heywoodg talk 07:14, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Can we rename this page?

message: A requested move affecting this page is being discussed at Talk:Tatler (1901)#Move. older ≠ wiser 21:55, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: I won't wade in with another page move while everything is still up in the air, but this article title should be Tatler (1709 journal) rather than Tatler (1709) - the disambiguation should tell the reader what they'll be getting if they click on the title. Wikipedia doesn't even use the year-only disambiguation for films; it's always "Title (19xx film)". --McGeddon (talk) 12:10, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Renamed to "The Tatler" because that is what it was called. filceolaire (talk) 18:32, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Well that failed. :( Anyone else want to try? filceolaire (talk) 18:39, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It's because The Tatler already exists as an article. You can leave a note at WP:RM/TR and ask an admin to clear the way and make the move; it seems uncontroversial (the sources all seem to refer to the journal as "The Tatler"). --McGeddon (talk) 18:52, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  (1709)