Talk:2008 United States Senate election in Virginia

message: I cleared out a lot of names that got added without any sources. --GBVrallyCI 01:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Buchanan is sourced, but not very reliably, at the following:
http://www.dailyprogress.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=CDP%2FMGArticle%2FCDP_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1173352734089&path=!news
i agree with the decision to remove he and allen, as allen is also hard to find a source; comment re sen. warner was not NPOV. Journalist1983 01:38, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Buchanan, Allen, etc.

message: OK, do we take this seriously?  First off, a search on the name doesn't turn up any sort of political career.  Second, the user adding the information,  would appear to be directly involved.  Are there any official filings we can go by to determine if a candidate is legitimately in the running? --StuffOfInterest 21:40, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if he files with the state, them yes. I believe you need a certain number of signatures by a date in January. I'd like a third party source really soon to keep it up. I think the Foundation trying to get attention for the brain damage cause and a bill in the Senate right now, and not really to challenge Warner.--Patrick Ѻ 00:46, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

text: What is the process for picking the Democratic nominee? 129.174.91.115 (talk) 16:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Delegates from across the state meet and try to get a majority of votes for a single candidate. I believe Warner was unanimously elected --Ram Astra (talk) 04:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Julien Modica 

message: I have a question about polling. Should the data reflect any "leaners", because I don't see why it shouldn't (or perhaps we could have an additional column reflecting leaners). Is there any official Wiki policy/guideline in regards to this? --Ram Astra (talk) 18:31, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polling 

message: Just a heads up, Mark Warner has thousands of usable images uploaded on his Flickr site from the whole length of the campaign if these ever need to change.--Patrick «» 06:31, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: There are a lot of words that weren't updated after the election, and thus assume that the election is still going on. We should change themSaberwolf116 (talk) 21:59, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past Tense 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on United States Senate election in Virginia, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20101028234525/http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=ratings-senate to http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=ratings-senate
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081120172055/http://www.cookpolitical.com/charts/senate/raceratings_2008-10-09_12-20-35.php to http://www.cookpolitical.com/charts/senate/raceratings_2008-10-09_12-20-35.php
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20101028234525/http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=ratings-senate to http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=ratings-senate
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified