lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming/Archive 9

message: Hi VoiceOfAll.  A more accurate label would be pro-censorship or anti-censorship.  Alternatively, pro-NPOV or anti-NPOV, anti-whitewash or pro-Whitewash, anti-spam pro-spam.  It is not a matter of certain NLPers being unbelievably thick and cretinous any more.  Nobody would be so stupid after so many repeat explanations at their own insistance.  They are simply being deliberately deviant, conflict forming, and antagonistic to NPOV policy. HeadleyDown 04:47, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting to see Comaze is still demonstrating his cultish fanaticism.  When deleting out of hand does not work, he goes back to formless NLP bullshit.  Comaze, when are you going to revert to the groundless accusation strategy?  I think you should model Akulkis.  He does "fanatical ranting" really well, so the rant would be an interesting "tweak" on your prior strategy.  Or you could go the FT2 way and claim wikipedia sainthood while stating your success was due to NLP being "really powerful", then indulge yourself to a few paragraphs of selective editing and posting your own opinion on the article.  Whether Comaze, and the other NLPsuckers are thick as bacon bagels, or just hoping that everyone else is, I reckon we shouldn't spend so much time expaining stuff to them.  Not more than 5 times per point anyhow. Cheers DaveRight 03:40, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm happy with NLP fanatics trying to look like they can do something useful.  Some of us have actually been to libraries to provide evidence for self-evident facts about NLP to cater for the unreasonable demands of NLP zealots.  Its time NLPers did some work, even if it is minor and menial, and even if they do try to unsuccessfully delete facts in the process.  HeadleyDown 16:36, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm happy with NLP fanatics trying to look like they can do something useful. Some of us have actually been to libraries to provide evidence for self-evident facts about NLP to cater for the unreasonable demands of NLP zealots. Its time NLPers did some work, even if it is minor and menial, and even if they do try to unsuccessfully delete facts in the processHeadleyDown 01:47, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ian Fraser (broadcaster)

message: I have been trying to find out if Ian Fraser the broadcaster is the same person as Ian Fraser the founder of Libertarianz.  My reason for wondering this is that Libertarianz leader Lindsay Perigo is also a broadcaster, and this would naturally link the two men—Copey
:Good question. I suggest you email the Libertarianz and ask them. If they are the same, please update this article, but I suspect they are different people. The very first version of the Lindsay Perigo (politician)(correct my typo: I meant Ian Fraser (politician)) article implied he was dead.-gadfium 21:24, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, he is not.  He is a family friend, so I can attest to that personally.  But, fair enough question. --LeftyG 06:44, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to clarify, are you saying that the two Ian Frasers are different people, or are you saying that the founder of the Libertarianz is not dead? To confuse matters more, I mentioned Perigo above when I meant the second Fraser-gadfium 07:37, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They are different Ian Frasers.  That's all I know. --LeftyG 07:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Someone (I can't remember who) once told me Ian Fraser is Peter Frasers nephew. Is that correct? --LJ Holden 09:40, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Fraser
Talk:Optical disc authoring

message: Would someone knowledgeable add a description of the actual process of writing an optical disc with a laser?  How, precisely, does it affect the disc?  (Obviously it changes reflectance somehow so that the disc can be read in the normal fashion.)  --Tardis 16:13, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The phsyical process 

message: In April 2008 there were quite a lot of compatibility issues but I think it has become much better now. Andries (talk) 22:41, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: blu ray authoring has become much more mature

message: If an information track consist of one or several sectors, how can one sector may contain several tracks ? That is a logical error. 
The correct one must be :
An information track contains one or more sectors. DOT.
One sector is the smallest addressable data. DOT. 
Observation: The physical track is another concept, related with the physical process of writing/reading CD or DVD.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.11.201.138 (talk) 00:58, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information track vs. sectors 

message: Shouldn't this be called "burning"? Authoring, which is needed only for DVDs, is using software to gather the wanted files, creating a menu, first-play, etc. and then outputing the VOB and TS files, ready for burning. This is covered in "DVD authoring."
NMackay (talk) 06:39, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The term "authoring" predates the existence of the DVD. That said, this article really does only discuss burning (desktop one-off disc creation). It doesn't handle commercial CD/DVD/BD authoring at all (i.e. for creating glass masters to press mass-produced discs from).--12:56, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authoring versus Burning 

message: Is the note appended at the end of the Process section correct? No cites have been referred and the content of it is however very interesting. Could anybody mention any program or OS that tend to behave like that? I'd rather be surprised to see GNU/Linux program acting in such a way. SMLVCFNCST (talk) 16:59, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Note" in section "Process" 

message: This article seems too much geared towards the burning  of individual discs in a PC CD drive or similar.  I was rather more interested in reading about professional bulk burning process carried out in factories as a cheaper alternative to CD replication.  There appears to be a certain amount of material about this in the old CD duplication article (now a redirect) which could possibly be incorporated here.81.158.209.175 (talk) 11:10, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  CD duplication (professional bulk-burning) 

message: This article seems to heavily suggest that the majority of CD burning is piracy related, both in the lead and the first or "primary" image.
145.40.189.56 (talk) 03:21, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias
Talk:Rainbow Books

message: see http://www.federalreserve.gov/Fomc/BeigeBook/2003/
Dehbach 17:01, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternate Meaning for Beige Book?

message: I would recommend that this category be called CD Specifications.  I am an engineer who has worked in the CD manufacturing business for 19 years, and while I have heard the term "Rainbow Books", it is a very rarely used phrase.  Try searching the Internet for any mention of it.  It is common for people in the industry to refer to the Red Book, the Yellow Book, or the Orange Book specifications, and very rarely, the White Book or the Blue Book.  It seems to me that as a category title, Rainbow Books is confusing.  While the phrase should be mentioned, the title should be CD Specifications.  Tvaughan1 13:22, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category Title? 

message: If these books have ISDNs, some kind of IEEE standard numbers, or whatever else might be of use in finding them in a (technical) library, please add this information. Thanks! -- 77.7.149.205 (talk) 15:23, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I am going to assume you meant ISBN. These were proprietary specifications so had no such thing. Some were later standardized under various organizations and thus do have some numbers (e.g., CD-DA, CD-ROM, etc.). Some just mostly died unstandardized (probably a good thing). 50.53.15.59 (talk) 11:49, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do the have ISDN's or other numbers by which they can be found in libraries etc.? 

message: CD-R (and I believe CD-RW discs) were around long before Orange Book was published.  Orange Book, as far as I recall only introduced multisession recording and was published to support the Kodak Photo CD format. 86.135.169.81 (talk) 17:25, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orange Book
Talk:Yellow Book (CD standard)

message: The Yellow Book is a specification.  While the word "standard" is quite similar, it doesn't quite mean the same thing.  Products such as CDs are produced to meet a specification.  When they are tested, they either meet the specification or they don't.  Specifications are very specific.  Standards can be something less specific.  Also - the Yellow Book applies only to CD-ROM, not to all CD formats.  I would suggest that this article be renamed Yellow Book (CD-ROM specification).  71.245.112.37 13:28, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A good point, and I have my own reasons to agree (older, well-known songs are sometimes called "standards", and when clarifying with exact details, one is giving "specifics.")  At the same time, when languaging such things, I have more often heard of "standardizing" than of "specificationizing" (the Yellow Book is an "industry standard.")  Maybe both terms should be included in the page title.  I'm not opposed to the change, but perhaps it would be best to get a few more opinions, hopefully from more senior editors?  TravellerDMT-07 17:51, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standard?
Talk:Orange Book (CD standard)

message: This article should be merged to Rainbow Books.  Please comment at Talk:Rainbow Books.  —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-15 11:43Z
:Done Kcordina 09:56, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge 

message: This article should be deleted so someone can write specific information about the Orange Book. Pages like ones for Beige Book and Purple Book do not exist, and have no redirect so why should this. Lunchscale (talk) 19:39, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete
Talk:White Book (CD standard)

message: Does the white book have a standard number, ISDN, official title, or anything else that would enable a person to find it in a technical library? -- 77.7.149.205 (talk) 15:32, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What I've found: ja:ビデオCD#cite_note-1 ==> https://www.lscdweb.com/ordering/cd_products.html ==> White Book Video-CD Specification ...  USD 200.00 Tadoritz (talk) 16:04, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standard number?
Talk:Oltenia

message: For some reason they do not work at all. Please fix it. ויקיג'אנקי (talk) 13:25, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is a problem with the Interwiki links for this article 

message: One caption says: "Oltenia under Austrian Kingdom". What kind of "Austrian Kingdom"? Austria was an empire, never a kingdom. Looks like this article was written by incompetent hobbyists.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.182.40.89 (talk) 19:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Austrian Kingdom"
Talk:Purple Book

message: This article should be merged to Rainbow Books.  Please comment at Talk:Rainbow Books.  —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-15 11:43Z
:Done. Kcordina 14:19, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge 

message: I came here looking for info on the book being put together by some UK Labour Party thinkers http://www.progressonline.org.uk/articles/article.asp?a=7995 - perhaps a disambiguation? Would also be happy to write a stub at least for this book - which may just (or become) notable enough, particularly now Ed Miliband has agreed to write the forward. Yossarian68 (talk) 23:21, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Labour Party Purple Book
Talk:Chablis wine

message: I do think all AOCs really ought to have their own article with the INAO regulations etc listed, though this is a slightly difficult case. Justinc 11:42, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Upon reflection, I think you're correct about keeping Chablis separate, so I have removed the "merge this article to Chardonnay" tag. I also thind that AOC and wine articles should be merged as a general principle, not just for the specific case of Chablis AOC and Chablis wine. -Amatulic 04:05, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merge

message: I've done a substantial rewrite, and also left merger notes on the other three AOCs not yet merged - it sounds like there's a consensus to do it, but it's only fair to do it by the book. (I support merger of the three other AOCs btw) FlagSteward 22:28, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: The final section of the article is currently poor. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trivia sections gives some advice on integrating such content, but not much of what is here is up to that challenge. I feel the "In popular culture" section could be removed without much loss. Charles Matthews (talk) 13:22, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "In popular culture" 

message: As of writing, the article begins "Chablis (pronounced [ʃabli]) is the northernmost wine district of the Burgundy region in France.". This isn't right, is it? The Jovinien and parts of Tonnerrois are further north. Unless anyone objects, I'm going to correct this to say northenmost AOP, but even that's arguably misleading if you include Appelations Régionale. Porphyro (talk) 20:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening line
Talk:Pentagram (band)

message: Should we add a Bedemon section to this page. While it is a seperate band they are intertwined and feature many of the same members. I do not think there is enough info to have a seperate Bedemon page so the logical place to put it is here. Any thoughts? Olliegrind 13:12, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now the albums containing tracks previously unreleased are two. I think the Bedemon are enough encyclopedic to have an article, also counting the relevance in the scope of doom. --Horcrux92 (talk) 15:38, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Bedemon

message: A entirely new Wiki page needs to be made regarding this band. They are tied in with the Pentagram history yes but currently they have been touring with the classic 80's Line up minus Bobby Liebling. Here is a link to the official website: http://www.placeofskulls.com/dr%20home.htm
Someone who is qualified should make a wiki article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.118.213.147 (talk) 10:34, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Death Row
Talk:Steven Stanley

message: Hey Jahsonic, just wondering how far you were wondering to take this article, because it is close to speedy deletion length... If you are willing to make a full length article about the person in question then mention this on the Talk page for the article, otherwise you may at least put a stub template at the end of the page - for a list of stub templates go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types haz (user talk) 11:49, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Haza, this is how far I am taking it, I put up a stub-notice. --Jahsonic 11:57, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Steven Stanley]] article
Talk:Track (optical disc)

message: A track can be further subdivided in indices. Anyone?
TIA, --Jerome Potts 21:23, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "index", please 

message: A sector is a frame, says one paragraph. A sector is divided into frames says the next one. Which is correct? —mjb (talk) 06:19, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Frames and frames

message: Track (disamb) links here. I'm confused: Aren't there tracks on Reel-to-reel audio tape, Compact Cassettes, LPs, etc., too? --Scriberius (talk) 19:12, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Track links here

message: "however, it is rare to find a CD player that displays or can access this feature, except occasionally in pro audio equipment, usually for radio broadcasting."
All my normal, non pro audio CD-Players (Sony) are displaying indices just fine. They cannot access them, though. That's the rare feature here.
"Additional songs, such as "hidden tracks", usually have index 2 or 3."
I think I have four CD with these annoying "hidden tracks". They do not have a additional index information. That's why at least I would refrain from using "usually" here.
There are some classical CD from Deutsche Grammophon that use indices, but it's far from common.--93.223.215.51 (talk) 14:50, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Index
Talk:Jón Sigurðsson

message: This page needs much more work -- Jón Sigurðsson is a revered figure in Icelandic culture. -- Palthrow
:True enough.  :) - Haukur 12:17, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added info about his ancestry, which Icelanders may find interesting, but it's nothing major.  I know somethings about Jón but there are some blanks that a native of Iceland will probably have to fill in.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SKC (talk • contribs) 19:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gaj Singh

message: Is he really a "reigning monarch" ??? Hektor 12:16, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not constitutionally, no.  The people of Jodhpur do give him some recognition however.--Couter-revolutionary 13:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

text: It was vandalism or a joke. I have removed it. 86.25.59.77 01:49, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Now Wkik reliable refrences and sources to his titles have been provided and his name cannot be changed to Mr Gaj Singh from HH Maharaja Gaj Singh ll. If that is done, vandalisim will be reported. Karan112 (talk) 23:26, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are there still Maharajas in India?---- YES, there are 

message: There have been a series of edits and reversions, I call it an edit war, regarding the term 'Titular Ruler' (an honourary position) Vs Gaj Singh as the Current Ruler.  I would encourage the various parties, particularly User:1.38.86.47 who has been very active on this subject.  I see another discussion further up regarding use of the term Maharaja which seems unconcluded, this seems to be a similar but separate issue.  Many thanks, JC aka Jthekid15 (Communications) 16:38, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titular Ruler Vs Current Ruler
Talk:Optical disc recording technologies

message: This is a new article to aggregate all the CD burning technology stubs (one of which got re-nominated for AFD the day it was kept).  It's part of the new series on optical disc authoring.  I have merged all the short articles here.  —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-15 12:29Z
:I assume that is why the buffer underrun section is copied from another wikipedia article Stwalkerster 15:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New article

message: This article is only about CD/DVD Recordables.  It does not address the entire line of optical storage.  Optical WORM (see also once-writable above) Write Once Read Many drives and media existed long before the CDs.  MO Magneto-Optical drive which was rewritable also came before CDs althought MO only used optical info for track alignment, data were stored magnetically so technically not an optical disc.  --NYC 18:18, 26 Dec 2006
:MO is an optical disc.  The reading of the data from the disc is done entirely optically.  It is the writing of the data that is done magnetically, but a laser is still required to heat the optical storage layer. 109.145.22.224 (talk) 12:55, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Incomplete

message: Most "authoring" (I find the term misleading) software and "recent" (as in most ATAPI-compatible) drives allow the use of various "raw" writing modes (I've seen RAW16, RAW96P, and RAW96R).  They seem to be distinct from DAO/SAO (between which most applications do not differentiate), but do in essence perform a whole-disc write.  Are these methods wholly distinct from the existing ones?  If so, how do they function (differently from TAO/DAO/SAO)?—Kbolino 21:21, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raw writing modes 

message: The Longevity section is confusing. It compares "store-bought" media with "factory-manufactured" media. To me, these terms are not mutually exclusive. Wasn't the media I might buy in a store manufactured at a factory?? This section needs to be clarified or rewritten. I can't do it because I just completely don't get the point.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.221.120.172 (talk) 05:26, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longevity
Talk:Enoch Soames

message: The Atlantic Monthly article by Teller about waiting for Enoch Soames is at this page; however, it can only be viewed by subscribers.
Was able to read it just now, despite the fact that I am not a subscriber, so it looks as if this restriction has been lifted. Marjaliisa (talk) 22:23, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In The Atlantic Monthly article, Teller describes "an angular man, about fifty, casually holding a tiny camera."  That man turned out to be Allan Hailstone, who captured the only known photograph of Enoch Soames, or more likely, if you no longer believe in Santa Claus, someone pretending to be him.  I’m going to figure out a way to work this into the article. Viriditas (talk) 23:42, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Atlantic Monthly article
Talk:Bell tower

message: * Agree with merger proposal; good idea Arnoutf 12:52, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a Dutch language old historical text, describing how the "oorkondes" (official bulls?) are kept in the belfry (belfort in Dutch) in Ghent. The website of the city of Bruges  (also in Dutch) states that the archive was located in the belfry until a fire in 1741. This tourist info sites also relates the archive function of the belfry of Ghent. This site contains more general info on the use of the Belgian belfries as archives. I cannot find immediately a serious historical peer reviewed article in English which gives this info, but if you feel that one of these links is adequate, feel free to add it! Fram 20:59, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial posts

message: In the Czech terminology, "zvonice" is ordinarily named a freestanding building near the church. The diminutive word "zvonička" is used for simplex posts, pillars or very small buildings (a very small chapel) which stand singly (in villages where is no church). Which is the right English special word for such objects? --ŠJů (talk) 14:38, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed two images where we cant say if they are "zvonička". Well the collegue discription is not well, because this "zvonička" is a free standing construction which doesnt belong to the church, while in the village may be a church. Then "zvonice" is for sure connected with a church and it is freestanding.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 15:53, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zvonička 

message: While a small gallery might be appropriate for this article, there are currently far too many images, particularly as the captions don't indicate they are being used to illustrate something encyclopaedic, different architectural features or styles, for example. Thryduulf (talk) 10:38, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many images 
Talk:Jean-Marc Nattier

message: "Straightforward portraiture"?  Nattier is famous for creating the genre of "portrait historié" which meant depicting rich but past-their-prime women in a very flattering and historicising way—and always endowed with enormous bosoms .  Calling this style "strightforward" is like calling Les Demoiselles d'Avignon realistic and detailed—I just don't get it. Maikel 12:53, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: There Is Nothing Straightforward About Nattier's Portraits
Talk:Mark Phillips (disambiguation)

message: I removed the "inventor". Firstly, it sounded rather fishy, secondly, it was completely ungooglable and there were no other references. Like the actual names of these supposed important inventions. A bit of digging later, turns out it was apparently added to Mark Phillips by Markp@dotcorporate.com, only contribution by this user, so I guess is nonnotable selfbio with no references and which is impossible to verify. Away it goes. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 12:53, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed the inventor 