lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rudolph Moshammer

message: Doesn't "Zwietracht" mean, "discord", "disagreement"?  It's the opposite of "Eintracht".
In the name of the band, it's a sort of pun, because "Zwietracht" also means "disharmony".
Further, the URL associated with the footnote, https://www.muenchnerzwietracht.de/, is a dead link.  But Münchner Zwietracht does have a Facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/muenchnerzwietracht
and there is no mention there that their name means, "The two garbs of Munich".  I suspect that this translation is just a translation program's result, not a correct translation.
And finally, is this detail even relevant to the article, since the article is about Moshammer, not Münchner Zwietracht.  There is an article dedicated to the band.
Best regards
TheBaron0530 (talk) 16:34, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The two garbs of Munich"?  Really?
Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Seattle2

message: ===Next meetup: January 15===
* Date: Saturday, January 15, 2005
* Time: 1pm–3pm and probably beyond
* Meetup point: Seattle Central Library, 10th floor east seating
* Dinner afterwards: tentatively...
====Planning to attend====
* Jmabel | Talk
* Michael Snow
* RadicalSubversiv E
* Keith D. Tyler [flame] would like to make it.
*Niteowlneils 21:41, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: From before the meeting

message: * Date: Saturday, January 15, 2005
* Time: 1pm–3pm and probably beyond
* Meetup point: Seattle Central Library, 10th floor east seating
* Dinner afterwards: tentatively...
====Planning to attend====
* Jmabel | Talk
* Michael Snow
* RadicalSubversiv E
* Keith D. Tyler [flame] would like to make it.
*Niteowlneils 21:41, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Next meetup: January 15

message: * Jmabel | Talk
* Michael Snow
* RadicalSubversiv E
* Keith D. Tyler [flame] would like to make it.
*Niteowlneils 21:41, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Planning to attend

message: * Decumanus I'll be in Colorado on a temporary business project in January.
* PMC - Oh, wow, that'd be really cool. Can't see me getting there though. My parents are already paranoid enough about me talking to "older people" on the Internet. Suggesting a meetup would make them panic. Too bad...it'd be easier if it were in Vancouver. Oh well *shrug* Someday.
*Bumm13
* BCRCornet 13:16, 2004 Dec 24 (UTC)
* JesseW 09:09, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Can't make it, comments, etc.

message: Please make suggestions
* Does anyone have experience with using Wikipedia in some way in a formal educational context (either as a source or having students write articles)? If so, I think that would make a great topic of discussion (how it went, what additional support we could give for that, etc.) -- Jmabel | Talk 08:41, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC)
* Might we want to start some particular regionally-oriented project? Or maybe regionally "adopt" some unrelated subject matter? -- Jmabel | Talk 08:41, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC)
** I'd like to talk about SeattleWiki, a Mediawiki-powered wiki I started for the Seattle area, including the possibility of sharing or delgating articles between Wikipedia and Seattlewiki, and so on. -- Matiasp 23:34, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Tentative agenda
Talk:Grimalditeuthis

message: I just want to check when Grimalditeuthis was discovered. This wikipedia page as I found it says that it was discovered 2005. However, the Tree of Life website contradicts this statement, saying that it was initially discovered in 1910 by Chun, although he called it Doratopsis sagitta. I did not change the date on this page because I am not completely certain if it was discovered in either 1910 or 2005. Can someone please verify this? This is the link to the website: . Thank you, TheOrangeOctopus (talk) 22:08, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It was first observed alive in 2005, the name Grimalditeuthis was created by Louis Joubin in 1898 for a species he called richardi while the species was originally described in 1836 as Loligo bonplandi, Joubin's G. richardi was found to be synonymous with L. bonplandi. Chun's Doratopsis sagitta was described in 1908 but again is now thought to be a synonym of Verany's Loligo bonplandi. Quetzal1964 (talk) 08:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discovery Date for this squid
Talk:Sugar House, Salt Lake City

message: Taking a cue from the work that the Wikipedians have done for the Sugar House article, I've established a MediaWiki-driven site for the Sugar House Community Council.
http://www.sugarhousecouncil.com
I welcome responsible contributions to this nacent site and hope that it becomes a valuable resource for the Sugar House neighborhood. Help in its administration would be greatly appreciated.
(I removed a link to SugarHouseLife.com. It is a well meaning web site, but it is a commercial endeavor designed to drive traffic to some real-estate agents.)
Cabot Nelson, Secretary, Sugar House Community Council
AdjustablePliers 02:59, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  MediaWiki site for Sugar House Comm. Council 

message: I just removed a remark calling 1980s Sugar House "the epitome of inner-city struggles."  Now I live in and love Sugar House, but who in the world could seriously compare us to the Lower East Side or Compton?    Inappropriatecontent 22:46, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miscellaneous 

message: Looks like SugarHouseTrolley.org is now gone, so I have removed the link.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwpwiki (talk • contribs) 19:57, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Link Removed
Category talk:Monarchs of Persia

message: *The following was moved from the talk page for Category:Kings of Prussia before it was deleted. RedWolf 23:44, Jan 16, 2005 (UTC)
I know that Shah means King in Persian, but the word "Shah" is almost universally used in English.  Shouldn't this be :Category:Shahs of Persia? john k 21:09, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed a shah is a king.  But the term "King of Persia" is rarely used in English.  We should stick with conventional English usage. john k 23:03, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category talk:Kings of Persia
Talk:OpenMosix

message: Hello! Please correct the OpenMosix to openMosix. Thank you. --Zoltan Kuscsik
:That's not possible, titles have to begin with a capital letter  --Lurker 01:16, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical Limitations 

message: (2006-11-25) Just to let you know.  The purpose of selecting an article is both to point readers to the article and to highlight it to potential contributors.  It will remain on the portal for a week or so.  The previous selected article was WINE. Gronky 17:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The selected article has moved on and is now GNU Radio. Gronky 18:34, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  On [[Portal:Free software]], openMosix is currently the selected article 

message: notability, merge into openMosix Widefox; talk 22:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[ClusterKnoppix]] 
Talk:Scientific Computing & Instrumentation

message: I'm recommending that the subject specific content be merged into the LIMS article.  As for the rest of the content, I'm a bit skeptical of the need for a full article about a niche journal.  I would be much more comfortable keeping the article if its significance were further expanded.  --Alan Au 09:33, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: mergeto:LIMS
Talk:Romanian Democratic Convention

message: According to Democratic Union of Hungarians in Romania, UDMR was part of this coalition from 1996 onward. Can anyone confirm or correct? -- Jmabel | Talk 01:05, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
: UDMR was never part of CDR, but they governed in coalition with CDR (and PD) from 1996 to 2000. IulianU 21:09, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: UDMR
Talk:Graham Yost

message: How come Paris can be occupied before WWII even started?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.110.240.100 (talk) 13:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "Nazi-occupied Paris on the eve of World War II"

message: shaving his legs?
watching queer guy?
really?
Feldercarb (talk) 22:34, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism?
Talk:Rationing in the United Kingdom

message: The way this article is written with phrases like "the priority users of fuel were always, of course, the armed forces" strongly implies original research, especially as sourcing is completely inadequate. That is why the OR tags have been placed. The article needs a complete rewrite, in my opinion, with all content based on reliable sources and properly cited. No Great Shaker (talk) 20:37, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a reference relating to petrol rationing in 1973.  I haven't removed the request for references in that section as the other items alos need to sources, I think.  Epzcaw (talk) 10:32, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article almost certainly contains original research 

message: Change "invalid" to "people who were ill or physically disabled."
"Invalid" is sometimes considered offensive. KublaiofXanadu (talk) 21:29, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It was the term in use at the time in connection with the special allowances. Also, someone who is physically disabled is not ipso facto an invalid. Sbishop (talk) 10:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. Actualcpscm (talk) 08:36, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 March 2023 

message: Alterations and additions made namely to the article section concerning the rationing of clothing. Including removal of short initial paragraph on clothes rationing (unreferenced and suggested to the reader that there is no further discussion of this topic, which does continue under the sub-heading of non-food rationing). 
Addition of historical information, references, images, and links to other related Wikipedia articles (Utility Clothing Scheme, Imperial War Museum, for example). 
Thank you! Diary of a Dress Historian (talk) 15:07, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Clothing' section
File talk:Zoetrope.jpg

message: That text about entertainment value is certainly not encyclopedic, but then again it's not an article either. Also, I couldn't bring myself to delete such a gem anyway. Are there any rules for image descriptions, guidelines? --fbjon ^^ 4649
:Its a bit of a grey area - You can move it to WP:BJAODN if you prefer. - Solipsist 21:14, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Ill

message: This page epitomes the argument for having unambiguous small L and capital i in the body of articles as well in the Times New Roman headings. Koro Neil (talk) 02:24, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  III, IIl, IlI, Ill, lII, lIl, llI or lll? 

message: To avoid confusion with III (three capital i's), this page should be moved to ILL. There previously was a page called "ILL" but it has since been merged into "ill". Bernardgeorgeh (talk) 22:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move to ILL
Talk:Quintation

message: Triple-Check the info in the value of 2^^^3 to make sure it is correct. What I get is this:
2^^^3 = 2^^(2^^2)
2^^^3 = 2^^4 = 65,536
Where is the flaw in this?? Georgia guy 23:06, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, the article is wrong. 2^^2 is not 2^2^2, as the article suggests when computing 2^^^3, but 2^^2 = 2^2; as you say. -- Jitse Niesen 10:50, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Value of 2^^^3
Category talk:Alaska boroughs

message: The following discussion comes from Wikipedia:Categories for deletion. This is an archive of the discussion. The decision was to keep this category (which is in keeping with U.S. county categories) rather than "Boroughs in Alaska".
===:Category:Alaska boroughs===
We currently have both :Category:Boroughs in Alaska (which is in keeping with several sisters) and :Category:Alaska boroughs (which has been around longer and is in keeping with county categories). Is a borough in Alaska more like a city (where "A in B" is standard) or a county (where "Bian As" is standard)? Are they really the same sort of thing as the siblings in :Category:Boroughs in the United States? Which should we keep? -Aranel ("Sarah") 23:19, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: CfD discussion

message: We currently have both :Category:Boroughs in Alaska (which is in keeping with several sisters) and :Category:Alaska boroughs (which has been around longer and is in keeping with county categories). Is a borough in Alaska more like a city (where "A in B" is standard) or a county (where "Bian As" is standard)? Are they really the same sort of thing as the siblings in :Category:Boroughs in the United States? Which should we keep? -Aranel ("Sarah") 23:19, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Alaska boroughs]]
Category talk:San Francisco County, California

message: The following discussion comes from Wikipedia:Categories for deletion. -Aranel ("Sarah") 02:22, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: CfD discussion

message: Redundant with :Category:San Francisco, as San Francisco is a consolidated city-county, therefore, they have the same territory and a unified government.  There is nothing that would be placed in one category that would not also be proper to place in the other. Gentgeen 21:10, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:San Francisco County, California]]
Talk:Mount Melbourne

message: I couldn't figure out what to do with this statement: "and thus renewed eruptions would likely not impact any human habitations, regional environmental or even global climate impacts are possible." Does it mean that regional and global impacts are possibly even though human habitation impacts aren't, or that they also are not? -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:34, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It means that there is no local population that could be impacted, but large eruptions may instead hit globally. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:04, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  sentence unclear 

message: So, I've been thinking of using this source but it's not clear to me whether these are draft rules or enforceable rules or anything. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:09, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are these enforceable rules? 

message: Jo-Jo, I am looking through now, but need to move from iPad to real computer to continue.  There is a considerable number of duplicate links-- too many for me to deal with, and some may be useful.  Do you have user:Evad37/duplinks-alt installed? SandyGeorgia (Talk)  16:06, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I got them all. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:52, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  SG review 

message: The article mentions that the mountain's summit may be reached by helicopter, but fails to say when the summit was first climbed.  Does anyone know? Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 21:37, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  First ascent? 

message: I am not sure I entirely like the formulation I gave to the info from , second opinions welcome. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:58, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information on parasitic vents 

message: Not sure that  is worth adding, it seems quite technical. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:02, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aeromagnetic information 

message: This source links the collapse of the Campbell Glacier 90,000 years ago to activity at Melbourne, but it's in Korean and I am not sure which eruption they are talking about. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:07, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Campbell Glacier collapse: Which eruption?
Talk:Minor civil division

message: Also, this page https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/guidance-geographies/terms-and-definitions.html says "MCDs are commonly known as towns (in New England, New York, and Wisconsin)" and "In Maine and New York, American Indian reservations are not part of any other MCD and therefore, the Census Bureau treats them as MCD equivalents."  and "061: State-County-Minor Civil Division (MCD) - the Census Bureau produces estimates for MCDs in 20 states. These legally defined county subdivisions are known by various descriptions, including towns (in New England, New York and Wisconsin)"
Cities and American Indian reservations -are- included in County Subdivisions, but not in MCDs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Socialresearch (talk • contribs) 22:59, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Towns, Cities, American Indian Reservations

message: One more, the page above also says "Incorporated places include cities, towns (except in New England, New York, and Wisconsin where the Census Bureau recognizes towns as MCDs for census purposes)". 
That is, cities are not MCDs.
(Also, sorry, I forgot to sign the other times)
Socialresearch (talk) 23:03, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Cities and Towns
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Libertas

message: I am not sure how to present this on the Evidence page since it specifically asks for diffs not links to pages (Diffs in this instance do not (imho) present the best demonstration of this evidence):
:There is an ongoing RfC about User:Iasson  , on the talk page for that RfC  User:Ollieplatt has repeatedly made accusations about User:Rhobite. Other than Rhobite making one comment on the talk page, neither user (to my knowledge) had any prior connection with that dispute. To avoid the issue dominating that RfC, I placed a note on the talk page and on Ollieplatt's talk page . He posted a reply on my talk page . In my opinion these allegations are at best bordering on personal attacks.
:I should make clear that I am the second certifying user in the above RfC. Thryduulf 20:14, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I give explicit permision for an arbitrator to move or copy this to the main evidence page, and to modify it to fit the required format of that page, should they feel the need.. Thryduulf 20:14, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Thryduulf's Evidence

message: Are reasons going to be supplied for this contemptible decision? If not there will be continued dissent against the Arbitrators chronic abuse of powers. Ollieplatt 01:59, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Temporary injunction (from main page)
Talk:Robert Stirling

message: Do we have a source for the claim that Stirling was born in "Cloag"?  As far as I can tell, Cloag is a farm just north of the Perthshire village of Methven (we don't have an article for the village yet, but I'll get around to it).  The proprietor of the farm (who naturally runs it as a holiday cottage too) doesn't mention this on his website.  I'll send them an email and see if they know anything about it. -- John Fader 03:08, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Note to self - here's the multimap OS page for Cloag. -- John Fader 03:12, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cloag?

message: Two persons, who studied heat machines:
1. Robert Stirling (1790–1878) married Jean Rankine.
2. William John Macquorn Rankine (1820–1872), son of Lt David Rankin (sic).
William Rankine is 30 years younger than Robert Stirling. Williams father carries the surname Rankin without "e". This indicates, that William Rankine is most probable no relative of Jean Rankine.
--Helium4 (talk) 07:06, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rankine vs. Rankin
Talk:Eugene Sandow

message: This page must be deleted. I have corrected all links to this page, as Eugen Sandow's name is not EugenE. The information has been copied to the correct page and all the links have been moved.
*yes it's true, Wikipedia had his name wrong for a long time. Rather than delete the page though, have created a redirect.  At least if the same mistake is repeated in future articles, it will direct to the right place.  Rossrs 10:55, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Arteritis

message: med-stub definition from page 227 of madical and health encyclopedia 1983 . RJFJR 03:28, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
Temporal arteritis sources:
St. Lukes Eye and
e-medicine 
RJFJR 03:52, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
36 Chapters: 
  1. Your body 
  2. The first 12 years 
  3. The Teens 
  4. The Beginning of a Family 
  5. The Middle Years 
  6. The Later Years 
  7. Diseases of the Skeletal System 
  8. Diseases of the Muscles and Nervous system. 
  9. Diseases of the Circulatory System  
 10. Heart Diseases  
 11. Diseases of the Digestive System  
 12. Diseases of the Respiratory System  
 13. Lung Diseases 
 14. Diseases of the Endocrine Glands 
 15. Diabetes Melitus 
 16. Diseases of the Eye and Ear 
 17. Diseases of the Urinogenital System 
 18. Cancer 
 19. Other Diseases of Major Importances 
 20. Surgery 
 21. Skin and Hair 
 22. Teeth and Gums 
 23. Aches and Pains 
 24. Allergies and Hypersensitivities 
 25. Women's Health 
 26. Physicians and Diagnostic Procedures 
 27. Nurtrition and Weight Control 
 28. Mental and Emotional Disorders 
 29. Substance Abuse 
 30. The Environment and Health 
 31. Health Insurance 
 32. Home Care of the Sick 
 33. Health Care Delivery 
 34. Voluntary Health Agencies 
 35. Medical Emergencies 
 36. Commonly Prescribed Generic Drugs  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lriley47 (talk • contribs) 16:40, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: med
Talk:New Zealand Parliament Buildings

message: I think the Old Government Buildings section should be removed from this page as the building has never been part of the parliamentary complex, nor ever used by Parliament. Cle0p4tr4 (talk) 10:43, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree - although the OG Buildings are no longer part of the Parliamentary complex, at one point in history, Government ministers uses the building during recess, and the Executive Council met there for a while. (See NZHPT website for OGBs.) Isn't that enough? Ballofstring (talk) 00:40, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Old Government Buildings
Talk:Gender and Women's Studies

message: Why is this a separate topic from women's studies and gender studies?  Is it deserving of an encyclopedia article in its own right?  It seems like a 100% overlapping topic to me.  I don't see any need for anything more than a note in both of those articles indicating (correctly) that they are frequently combined under one rubric.  Am I missing something, or should this be merged and redirected? -- Rbellin|Talk 03:42, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge and redirect?