lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Until I Find You

message: I deleted the "Alternative Comment" section added by robert, as it's nothing but original research and non-NPOV. I'd appreciate it if it stayed gone this time. Tudwell 02:43, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative Comment 

message: Maria Antonietta Beluzzi's page says "her performance is discussed fondly by the characters" in this book. Can anyone who read this book elaborate more (and perhaps update her page)? -Lwc4life 12:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maria Antonietta Beluzzi 

message: Maybe the second paragraph (about the cover of the first edition) belongs to a new section with production anecdotes (Trivia?) --d-axel (talk) 20:29, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second paragraph of article
Talk:Composite Health Care System

message: This article is about AHLTA and should be moved to that page. MUMPS is a hierarchical database not relational.
AHLTA has no page on the Wikipedia. I wanted to create one, but didn't since creation now requires a login. What is MUMPS?71.105.42.21 00:16, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello all - this page should not be renamed or moved to an AHLTA page because CHCS is not AHLTA. AHLTA is a new system that "interfaces" with the legacy CHCS system. At some point the legacy CHCS system will not be avilable to end users but this entry in wikipedia is intended to describe the legacy CHCS system. 
MUMPS is the programming language used to implement the legacy CHCS system and is therefore mentioned in this entry
Akuma624 (talk) 20:54, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  AHLTA VS CHCS VS MUMPS 

message: For a system which was sold to the military by SAIC, at the cost billions of dollars, based on software which the VA already paid for, which takes weeks to train people to get started, this is a very short article.
The article about AHLTA has no primary sources, nor is there any about CHCS for that matter.  
This article doesn't even meet the barest level of Wikipedia acceptance quality and should be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.140.37.77 (talk) 02:24, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is the article on CHCS? 

message: i beg to differ...umless you did not read the original post?.. as a current employee for DOD. The literature is spot on!! 104.222.56.140 (talk) 11:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replying
Talk:Macrurosaurus

message: What should the authorship date be? The text of this article states that the taxon was only considered valid upon the 1876 paper. However, the listed authorship date in the taxobox was recently changed to 1869, on the basis that the taxon was actually described in that paper after all. But if that is so, why is it written in the text that it was only valid from 1876? Is it possible that the initial 1869 description was insufficient to be a valid description?
Few papers seem to refer to this taxon, but these two refer to the authorship as "Seeley, 1869":
*Le Loeuff, J., Suteethorn, S. and Buffetaut, E., 2013. A new sauropod dinosaur from the Albian of Le Havre (Normandy, France). Oryctos, 10, pp.23-30.
*Knoll, F., COLLETÉ, C., DUBUS, B. and PETIT, J.L., 2000. On the presence of a sauropod dinosaur (Saurischia) in the Albian of Aube (France). Geodiversitas, 22(3), pp.389-394.
Although, interestingly, this one seems to refer to the authorship as "Seeley, 1869, 1876"?:
*Calvo, J.O. and Bonaparte, J.F., 1991. Andesaurus delgadoi gen. et sp. nov.(Saurischia-Sauropoda), titanosaurid dinosaur from the Río Limay Formation (Albian-Cenomanian), Neuquén, Argentina. Ameghiniana, 28, pp.303-310.
Note that this also has relevance to the list of years in paleontology pages. Currently this taxon's description is listed in the 1876 in paleontology page. With no reference, of course. Those articles are a mess.
Zigongosaurus1138 (talk) 18:24, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authorship date
Talk:Gratz v. Bollinger

message: There is a template infobox that looks exactly like the "homemade" infobox on the side called .  In fact, it's so identical I'm wondering if someone subst'd it.  Could someone take the time to transfer all the information into the templated infobox, so when the infobox is updated all the case articles are standardized?  I can't get to it right now.  Just bringing it to people's attention.  —Akrabbimtalk 23:51, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I got it done, just I don't know the case number, if anyone could figure that out. —Akrabbimtalk 20:58, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template:SCOTUSRecentCase]] 
Talk:Bad Bargain

message: Good links would be to the next and previous book, books that refer to events in this one or books referred to in this one, or perhaps Buffy/Angel books by the same author.  "New/upcoming" is not encyclopedic.  --ΨΦorg 04:24, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upcoming books are not "related" 
Talk:HPV (disambiguation)

message: In the top 100 hits for a Google search on the term "hpv" there are 95 hits for pages related to human papillomaviruses and only 4 hits for human powered vehicle-related pages.  I therefore think it's sensible to redirect searches for "hpv" or "HPV" directly to the human papillomavirus article.  A standard redirect link at the top of the human papillomavirus page points people interested in other possible meanings of "HPV" to this standard disambiguation page.  Retroid 13:31, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Even though HPV is more commonly known as "Human papillomavirus", it is still an abbreviation, and should be treated as such, with an initial search results page displaying all the different and most common meanings for that acronym.  I would, instead of creating an automatic redirect page, list the different meanings in order from most common to least common, so people have a choice.
:See the discussion on Talk:HPV and add your comments there. Metros232 19:55, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's still an abbreviation
Talk:HM Land Registry

message: This article is suddenly beginning to look like a press release with many glowing terms and lots of named people. Oosoom 00:05, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loosing its neutral encyclopedic nature 

message: I have made more than 6 attempts to purchase documents from LR but every time the transaction fails at the card verification stage.  I have used different computers with different security settings and have made successful purchases with the same cards elsewhere.  My conclusion is that WorldPay itself is at fault and that LR would be better served by a more competent card processing service.
It is further exacerbating that in order to contact the LR you have to join a social media service - their site won't accept comments direct. 89.39.161.44 (talk) 07:15, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Online Payments 
Talk:Adalbert I, Margrave of Tuscany

message: I think the birth date is wrong: it seems that Boniface his father died in 834. Srnec 00:13, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: fixed Srnec 00:30, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The name of Adalbert(O) is misspelt, his name is Adalberto - which a vowel, as in Italian, every noun (that includes names) - have vowels! Plus, I have checked in many sources, his name is AdalbertO !
--Tommy Gallagher (talk) 18:08, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide those sources. In the meantime i will revert your change.Sjö (talk) 17:07, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Name misspelt
Talk:Généralité

message: Surely the généralité of Bordeaux was for Guyenne, not Guyana?! Silverhelm 00:19, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guyana 

message: What are the surface areas in mi²/km2 for these généralités of France? I can't find that anywhere on Wikipedia. 137.254.4.5 (talk) 19:05, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surface Areas
Talk:Prospect Heights, Brooklyn

message: The reference for The Encyclopedia of New York City should be changed from Columbia University Press to Yale University Press. I think that Columbia might have published a previous edition, but the one currently available is definitely published by Yale.
: There was a 1991 edition, I think, but the 1995 edition was from Yale and the NY Historical Society. I have greatly expanded the footnote with full bibliographic details and ISBN. Shakescene (talk) 21:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''[[Encyclopedia of New York City]]''

message: This page definitely needs some more fixing up. I tried to remove the non-neutral point-of-view material, and make it more neutral than it was in various ways. But the article could use some citations for the current development controversy section, and more filling out generally. CHE 00:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done some further neutral-POV cleanup. Mrnorwood 01:34, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up 

message: This article cites and promotes a local restaurant and website.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prospect_Heights%2C_Brooklyn#Culture
Promotion of a business and a personal website (even if it is sold as a community site) is not a neutral POV, in my opinion. The restaurant may have some local historic value, but I see no evidence to back that up. The inclusion of personal website, especially one that contains advertising and whose revenue may be increased through linking from this Wikipedia page is to me, inappropriate.
*Remove it. Alansohn 19:36, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV dispute 

message: I love that this neighborhood only boasts five notable residents--one of who is a dog!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.45.0.133 (talk) 04:47, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tillamook Cheddar 

message: I have a copy of the Encyclopedia of New York City second edition, and I was asked to check what it says about the boundaries of this neighborhood.  I have done so, and it gives the same boundaries as I see in the current version of this article: N: Atlantic Avenue, E: Washington Avenue, S: Eastern Parkway at Grand Army Plaza, and W: Flatbush Avenue.  I've updated the ref in the article to indicate this. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:51, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Encyclopedia of NYC, second edition

message: The race/ethnicity profile in the Demographics section (paragraph 2) are from 2010 and don't align with the profile in the table at the top of the page. Asians, for instance, are described as being 0.1% in the demographics section and 7.7% in the table. Frank Lynch (talk) 18:56, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neighborhood Demographics
Talk:Sunstorm (novel)

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: page moved (although not by me). --  Jokes Free4Me (talk) 04:29, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

message: If anyone if interested, there is a 3rd and final book in this series called "Firstborn". It is due out in early 2008. 149.117.164.28 (talk) 23:24, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Firstborn
Talk:Tulsa Zoo

message: Tulsa Zoo and Living Museum clearly should be merged with Tulsa Zoo (they are the same thing afterall).  Most people simply refer to it as the Tulsa Zoo and truncate Living Museum. Ash Lux 00:29, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone ahead and taken care of this.  Ash Lux 15:25, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging Tulsa Zoo and Tulsa Zoo and Living Museum 

message: I'm muddypebbles. To be transparent I work at the Tulsa Zoo. My intent was to correct old information so that people knew which animals to expect and the names exhibits go by in 2019.
I would like to recommend the following changes to fix the advertisement feel:
Animals and Exhibits
Lost Kingdom Exhibit Complex
Change section text too: Lost Kingdom is the zoo's new home for Malayan tigers, snow leopards, Chinese alligators, siamangs, binturongs red pandas and Komodo dragons.[11]
Muddypebbles (talk) 14:59, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixing neutrality and advertisment feel of text. 

message: 2017 - St. John Family Den opened 
2017 - Lost Kingodm opened 
2018 - Osage Casino & Hotel Giraffe Barn opened 
Muddypebbles (talk) 15:26, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested timeline edits 

message: Hi Jeff,
Last year I made edits to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsa_Zoo
Those edits were removed because of the conflict of interest clause. I immediately changed of my username from TulsaZoo to muddypebbles. Then, I noted changes in the talk page as suggested, transparently listing that I am employed by the Tulsa Zoo. Can you please look to see if these changes fix the issues listed at the top of the page:
The neutrality of this article is disputed. (May 2019)
This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. (May 2019)
Thank you for your help!
Muddypebbles (talk) 21:15, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest
Talk:Homer City Generating Station

message: There's really no "history" in the History section. It is really the pre-history of the parcel on which the generating station sits.  A real history section would talk about how the plant came to be built, not that Giovani or Peter Benamati had a farm or raises turkeys, which is neither germaine to the power plant, nor even well-sourced. KevinCuddeback (talk) 13:05, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Rklawton (talk) 20:03, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  History Section (vs Benamati family history) 

message: I took out the two photos because they were really messing up the flow of the article. Perhaps this needs an infobox? Is there a template that would work here? Maybe someone who knows more of the wikipedia formatting can do this for us...--Hepcat748 (talk) 01:19, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos and Infobox 

message: Although the pollution is said to have been reported by the Pittsburgh Gazette, a citation really is needed.
Secondly, they use the word "recently" rather than writing some sort of annual rate. Clearly this should be fixed.
Kit Cloudkicker (talk) 15:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pollution 
Talk:Shapeshifters in video games

message: This page was renamed as part of an attempt by me to disambiguate the Therianthropy article (see Talk:Therianthropy. In less than a minute, the disambiguation page I'd created was reverted, apparently auto-reverted without looking at the content. Please leave this page in existence until I've figured out whether the community is going to let there be a disambiguation page for therianthropy. 
*Arguments in favor: 
*1)The vampire subculture and the vampire folklore page are two separate articles.
*2)The otherkin subculture is a separate article from the articles on the folklore of creatures such as elves, dragons and so on.
*3) The furry subculture is a separate article from the many types of funny animal, mythical and fictional, that inspire the furry subculture.
*Please talk about it at Talk:Therianthropy Blue Milk Mathematician 00:28, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Plage (mycology)

message: This article is a stub without much room for expansion. This information formally was found on the disambiguation page plage, however, the external links, etc, made it inappropriate for a disambiguation page. At some point, I'd like to merge this into a larger article, either basidiospore or spore (fungi), where differences between different fungal spore features would be discussed. Peter G Werner 00:35, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Old Roman chant

message: Can you name a partisan for the minority view of the origins as city church usage? It's nice that you could attach prominent musicologists to the other opinion, and it would help describe the controversy to do so for the other side. Rigadoun 15:50, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! Peirigill 18:06, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello,
I recently discovered Old Roman chant and was startled by its similarity with Byzantine chant.
For now, I have found only 2 sources:
* the St Marcel Mass chanted by Marcel Peres' ensemble (CD by Harmonia Mundi)
* http://www.romancatholicism.org/chant/old-roman-byzantine-chant.htm (dead link)
::Archived version of the above dead link:
::*https://web.archive.org/web/20061020233256/https://www.romancatholicism.org/chant/old-roman-byzantine-chant.htm
I am not a specialist, but it's intriguing that no hint is given in this article concerning the source of this similarity. The text on "romancatholicism.org" gives some hints, but I don't know if the site is serious enough (I found it by googling for "old roman chant", and I was not able to find who owns the site).
Cheers, Dpotop (talk) 13:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is exactly what I was going to post. They seem to describe in detail its similarities with all other chants, yet absolutely nowhere is the word "Byzantine" even found. Quite a shame if you ask me. L' Orgoglio 05:43, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: (11 years later) Is mention of the word "Byzantine" going to be added to this article soon? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 02:13, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Byzantine filiation?
Talk:Palaeoctonus

message: Based on the sources I had, I'm not sure if this is considered a dinosaur or not, which is why I added the  tag to one of the sentences.
In one of them, it mentions this...this might be a good lead for someone
 Cope, E.D. 1877. Report upon the extinct
 Vertebrata obtained in New Mexico by portions of
 the expeditions of 1874. Report of the
 Geographical Survey west of the 100th meridian
 by Lt. G. M. Wheeler 4 (2): pp. 1-365; [nomen dubium; phytosaur]
--HappyCamper 00:42, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Chrysopogon zizanioides

message: The Salvation Army in Australia contributing funds in 2006 to an agricultural project in central China. Professor Xu Li-yu of the Chines Vetiver Network held training sessions in several villages about soil and water conservation. Villagers planted vetiver grass in rows along the barren slopes of a hillside, along with chestnut and some mulberry trees. New tea bushes were planted in a field previously used for wheat.
[This is all I know. How did it go? Was this a once-off?]
[My first effort here. If I have trangressed anyone's rules, I plead ignorance and ask forgiveness. I am willing to learn.]
210.84.54.216 00:44, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I'm not sure if the correct genus of vetiver is Chrysopogon or Vetiveria, being zizanioides the specific epithet for both.
Can you help me to find a refference to truly say that Chrysopogon is the correct genus?
This is because in spanish Wikipedia, the 'correct' genus is Vetiveria.
And about the alleged synonym (Vetiveria zizanioides), how can a genus that has another species inside be a synonym of other genus' species?
Sorry If I can't express myself in a good way. English is not my first language.
--Avilation2004 (talk) 22:37, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Chrysopogon is indeed incorrect. Chrysopogon is a family of of very large flies commonly known as Robber flies. Lepus526330 (talk) 12:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems Chrysopogon is also used as the scientific name, on official sites, for some grasses. Most confusing. Lepus526330 (talk) 12:51, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

text: https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:396213-1#synonyms states that Chrysopogon is the accepted placement. There is no issue with a clash with the genus of a fly. The zoological and botanical nomenclatural codes are independent. Shyamal (talk) 14:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thankyou. Good to know. Lepus526330 (talk) 18:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genus Chrysopogon or Vetiveria 

message: I question this addition. It appears to have been written by a child; I can't check the source (it's in hebrew); the researcher in question lists no such paper on his own site; and the place he works--the Volcani Center--has nothing to do with volcanoes, as is suggested by this entry.  I recommend deletion.
"Fuel cleaning
A recent study, made in the volcanic institute in Israel, by Dr. Nativ Dudai found out that the plant is capable of growing in a fuel-contaminated ground. In addition to that, the study discovered that the plant is also able to clean the ground, so in the end, the soil is almost fuel-free.[9]"
Eperotao (talk) 17:57, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Volcani Center
Talk:McKenzie River (Oregon)

message: * http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2010/5016/section2.html - general stuff about watershed and dams
** http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2010/5016/pdf/sir20105016.pdf - full USGS report (added here 8 July 2014)
* http://or.water.usgs.gov/proj/EWEB/description.html - report on study of water quality
* http://www.blm.gov/or/resources/recreation/site_info.php?siteid=64 - bits about recreation, fauna
* http://waterdata.usgs.gov/usa/nwis/uv?14162500 - flow data
* http://wdr.water.usgs.gov/wy2011/pdfs/14162500.2011.pdf - historical flow data
* http://or.water.usgs.gov/data_dir/pfo_pdfs/McKenzie_cross-sections.pdf - more flow data
* http://www.rivers.gov/rivers/rivers/mckenzie.php - Wild & Scenic designation
* http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~ecostudy/elp/mohawk/pdfs.html/Mckenzie%20Info.pdf - UO Environmental Studies report on river
--Jsayre64 (talk) 04:54, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources to use 
Talk:Disney Star Kerala

message: Asianet Communication Limited and Asianet are not one and the same. One is a channel, and the other the holding company. 
117.240.111.2 (talk) 21:46, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In case, it is so, please update the information accordingly, and remove the factual inaccuracy tag. --Bhadani 16:28, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Reach (Planet)

message: I have removed the deletion notice. I contend this article is notable by the mere fact that I was interested in reading about Reach. This article also relates canon rather than fan fiction. --Robthebob 01:00, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: This article does not need merging, it is the most important planet in Halo after Earth and deserves its own article. I've cleaned it up a little, all it needs is a picture (screenshot from Halo 2 would help). Bronzey 13:11, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup and merge
Talk:Rough Trade (band)

message: Hmm, a few factual errors in here but I'm not 100 percent certain on them: We just got in the mail a live-performance CD from Kevan Staples, to my step-father Bob Jennings (who was bassist for the band around 1973). As far as I can tell, the band was called Rough Trade in '73 already, as that's what it says on the album and that's the only name Bob's ever referred to it as.(Zeekthegeek)
Hi, I don't really want to start editing someone else's work, but I'll just say here that I live in Toronto and there were a couple of reunion concerts since 2000 - notably at Pride in ( I think) 2005, possibly 2006, at which they were remarkably 'together' for musicians who had been apart for years.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.52.223.216 (talk) 06:46, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: errors 

message: I was a member of the band and this article has quite a few mistakes..... both time line and personel.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.29.135.59 (talk) 13:55, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If you've got published sources that can verify your claim, please don't hesitate to contribute! 174.94.0.122 (talk) 01:50, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Many mistakes