lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mondello Park

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:13, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good call. There has to be more coverage of Modello Park on 3rd-party sites and in books That can be used to flesh out this one. ww2censor (talk) 16:16, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Anjad

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:29, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Antari

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:29, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Aron, India

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:30, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Kevin Joyce (basketball)

message: It should be mentioned in the article that Joyce, like many other members of the 1972 team refused their silver medals.  Joyce is one member who has had it written into his will (per a Sports Illustrated article on the subject) that no member of his family should accept such a medal posthumously on his behalf.(Ron (talk) 19:31, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a little bit about that. Do you happen to know the title of the Sports Illustrated article? Maybe I can track it down. Zagalejo^^^ 21:58, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Music Is My Hot Hot Sex

message: *There was no single released, and that is not the real music video. 03:27, 11 December 2007 User:68.44.235.14
*Sorry about that, I should have looked at the video more clearly. It was just made by a fan. However the song was released as a single according to allmusic. It is also referred to as a single on the CSS page, and even includes chart performance. RoamingComedian (talk) 17:26, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Queries

message: *Page Music Is My Hot, Hot Sex started as page Music Is My Hot Hot Sex by copy-and-paste from an older page Music Is My Hot, Hot Sex, whose edits after the copy-and-paste I moved to Music Is My Hot, Hot Sex (version 2) while repairing page Music Is My Hot, Hot Sex's hstory. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:24, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's good you noticed the missing history, but isn't the official name of the song actually "Music Is My Hot Hot Sex" without a comma? Bognan72 (talk) 00:15, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History repair

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Oppose Albums, books, and other works often drop punctuation or use idiosyncratic capitalization that don't make sense in or have any application to use in normal text. -Rrius (talk) 20:50, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Smurfette

message: Who knew Smurfette had a rather tragic and symbolic conception and rebirth.  Damn.
I know... it's shocking.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Donnyj (talk • contribs) 15:11, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Here I was thinking Smurfette was real.  Thanks to the good people here at Wikipedia I now know she's a fictional character!  Wow!  Thanks!  74.14.81.244 (talk) 13:32, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thank you, Wikipedia 

message: It's stated in this article that Smurfette wasn't part of the original Belgian comic.  In fact she was in the third volume, La Schtroumpfette, and her story is virtually identical to the cartoon version.  174.91.3.193 (talk) 01:20, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  La Schtroumpfette 

message: A WP:SPA  edited this article heavily, while relying on TV tropes as a source. TV Tropes is itself a wiki, thus cannot be qualified as a WP:RS. As a result, I had to revert the edits alltogether. Best regards,Jeff5102 (talk) 13:07, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: TV Tropes
Talk:Babai, Madhya Pradesh

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:31, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 

message: it is very beautifull city.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.168.142.100 (talk) 12:22, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  something new
Talk:Bada Malhera

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Badagaon

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Badagoan

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Badawada

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Badkuhi

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:33, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 

message: There's an article on Barkuhi township, leaving me slightly confused. Please someone clear the misunderstanding. 212.188.108.44 (talk) 14:06, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Badkuhi or Barkuhi
Talk:Badnagar

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:33, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Badnawar

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:33, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 

message: I believe the name of Badnawar was earlier Vardhamanpur. Vardhamanpur refers to Lord Mahavir, not to Lord Buddha, as mentioned in the article lead. - Rajmal Saraf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.196.220.252 (talk) 14:32, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that is true. Several Jain inscriptions found here mention Vardhamanapur as the name of the place. A cave temple at Ellora was apparently constructed by a family originally from here in 1247 CE Beyond Buddhist and Brahmanical Activity: The Place of the Jain Rock-Cut Excavations at Ellora, Lisa nadine Owan, PhD Dissertation University of Texas at Austin, May 2006, p. 254-257 (talk) 00:36, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology of name
Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction)/proposed-12-9-07

message: Notability defined as having secondary sources info such as sales and other info is a lot better than rejecting anything but academia Renmiri (talk) 03:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh? The current WP:FICT doesn't reject anything but academia.. -- Ned Scott 05:22, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Much better
Talk:Badod

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:33, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Badra, India

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:33, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Baihar

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:34, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Great White Whale

message: This page is important because it gives information about the band's first album.
People are going to look this up and not find it.
:This does not make it notable. See notability guidelines. peterl (talk) 04:08, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Notable or not, CSD A7 doesn't apply to albums. --Tikiwont (talk) 14:01, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Category talk:First ladies and gentlemen of Argentina

message: Zulemita Menem was the daughter, not the spouse of Carlos Menem. This same thing happened in Peru, with Alberto Fujimori and daughter Keiko Fujimori. Maybe we should consider a category "First people of" ;) ... SamEV (talk) 04:17, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: One problem, Gugganij
Talk:Small nucleolar RNA U3

message: The "2° structure" Pubmed link in Rfam_box seems to be wrong.
It goes here:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=10199569&dopt=Abstract
This paper (Pubmed ID 10199569) seems to have nothing to do with U3, unless I am missing something.
I e-mailed Rfam about this a while back and they opened ticket Hinxton #114061 for it, but I haven't seen it acted on.
I would love to fix this myself, and I can certainly remove the wrong link, but I do not know if I should replace it with anything!
Cheers,
AndrewUzilov (talk) 22:21, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong citation/link? 

message: Info on discovery and gene structure would be helpful to add. Katesee (talk) 20:08, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Sections
Talk:Balboa High School (Panama)

message: R ob2303 (talk) 04:27, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: This needs a thorough rewrite for several reasons. Among them, the fight song and alma mater for this school do not merit inclusion in an encyclopedia article. The entire flavor of the article is poor and not up to standards. Also, the discussion of the 1964 controversy is horribly biased, and it looks as if it were written by an anti-Panamanian partisan with some knowledge concerning the historical facts. There were, in fact, a number of controversial issues, of which this was only one. Some additional comments:
:: The passing reference to the race of US attendees is fair and accurate (this, and this kind of thing, never did sit well with Panamanian culture, which did not suffer from US-style race relations).
:: Regarding the flag issue - as a reminder that the Canal Zone is in Panama, US law REQUIRED that the Panamanian flag fly wherever the US flag was flown. At the high school, which was run by Zonians, US students refused to raise the Panamanian flag (a ceremonial flag raising by students is common at US schools). No need to rehash the consequences here, but flag-raising was taken over by the school ROTC, which was led by active-duty US military personnel, and US law was thereafter followed. The activities of the Zonians dishonored a flag, but I would hold that it was not the Panamanian flag that was dishonored by their actions.
:: Before integration, the school was attended by three rather distinct groups, of approximately equal number: Zonians (US civilians living in the Canal Zone), US military dependents (who are not considered Zonians), and Panamanians (all or nearly all from the upper class). As to why so many Panamanians might attend a US school when international relations are reported as being poor, consider that (1) people are people, and the relationships of governments do not necessarily mean that the relationships of individuals follow in lock-step; (2) international relations are not as one dimensional as they are often portrayed, and the opportunity to attend a good US school is as broadening to the student as would be the case if roles were reversed; and (3) attending a US high school has advantages when applying to a US college, and Panamanian students were very much aware of this.
:: Had to cut this horribly POV line: "These martyrs, and the 1989 US invasion, have been exploited shamelessly by Panamanian nationalists and politicians for decades now."
24.178.228.14 (talk) 22:35, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a thorough rewrite
Talk:Etobicoke—Lakeshore (provincial electoral district)

message: I'm just curious as to where the source is for the candidates of the upcoming 2014 election. None of the names are confirmed anywhere with a quick search on Elections Ontario but I could be wrong. Any help is appreciated, thanks :) Aerospeed (Talk) 01:20, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's a good source: http://on.punditsguide.ca/parties_e.php?elec_event=42&pane=1 -- Earl Andrew - talk 01:22, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Candidates confirmation?? 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Tennessee/Archive 1

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:24, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

message: Hi!  I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate.  This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group.  If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:43, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinators' working group 

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 04:00, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: There is currently a discussion taking place at WT:HWY regarding the potential use of coordinates in highway articles. Your input is welcomed. --Rschen7754 02:01, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: RFC on coordinates in highway articles
Category talk:User essays

message: Are the templates supposed to be filled out in a manner to get the articles to sort by essay title, by username, or something else?  I ask because the existing entries seem to be all over the place on this. Some are even under "U" for "User". *Dan T.* (talk) 04:51, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, the template needs to be fixed to sort it properly under the name of the essay not the username.. and any essays with the :Category:User essays tag placed manually are automatically sorted under U for "Username" unless you specify what letter to sort it under, as in: T to sort it under the T's. All those essays under "U" should be re-sorted and I'd like to know if there's an easy and quick way to do this without having to edit each essays category tag. -- OlEnglish (Talk) 19:04, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

text: No 151.63.27.213 (talk) 21:50, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Yes, they should be sorted by the first letter after "User:" or "Wikipedia:". Same goes for the rest of our non-articles.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  02:51, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comments

message: This category is getting pretty large and I thought some more subcategories would be beneficial, so I added two new ones; :Category:User essays on notability, and :Category:User essays on deletion. Please let's try to fill these by sorting existing essays and adding new ones directly under these subcats. In the future we can expand even more:
*:Category:User essays on adminship
*:Category:User essays on neutrality
*:Category:User essays on policy
*:Category:User essays on governance
*:Category:User essays on consensus
And so on. Though the question is, whether it's more useful to sort these by topic or username? Are readers searching for user essays more likely to be interested in who wrote the essay or what they're writing about? -- œ™ 20:45, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposals for subcategories
Talk:Tardenoisian

message: The time limits of this culture are incorrect. The article states that this culture began around 7500 BC and lasted until the Neolithic. However, the Neolithic began BEFORE 7500 BC! This date range needs to be corrected with a verifiable and reliable reference included. --Saukkomies talk  05:03, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Neolithic started before that time but it was mach later when it reached western Europe, so this might be OK. The Neolithic refers not to the time limits but to a certain technology and lifestyle. Леонардо Кобеш (talk) 23:47, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect data
Talk:Swiderian culture

message: "The Developed Swiderian appeared with their migrations to the north and is characterized by tanged blades: this stage separates the northwestern European cultural province, embracing Belgium, Holland, northwest Germany, Denmark and Norway, and the Middle East European cultural province, embracing Silesia, Brandenburgia, Poland, Lithuania, White Russia, Central Russia, Ukraine and the Crimea." The "Northwestern European cultural province" is actually the area of the Ahrensburg culture; there is no Swiderian in, e.g., Norway.
It is questionable whether the lengthy discussion on the post-Swiderian complex belongs here; post-Swiderian is a separate and quite extensive phenomenon that definitely should have its own entry in Wikipedia. What this article needs, however, is a more thorough description of actual Swiderian itself.--Death Bredon (talk) 06:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swiderian, Ahrensburg, and Post-Swiderian 

message: Both graphs demonstrate a pur Polish distribution which is absolutely mistaken and appears nationalistic only.2A02:8108:9640:AC3:A820:5354:20FC:97A0 (talk) 07:26, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polish nationalism