Talk:Digital intermediate

message: The article discusses some general elements about digital intermediate, but does not say anything about aspect ratios. While in the past changing the aspect ratio consumed a lot of time and money in the laboratory, digital intermediate is a replacement of which the process is a lot easier and a cheaper. I think it would be very useful if the process of changing the aspect ratio with digital intermediate would be thoroughly explained throughout the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koen534 (talk • contribs) 15:54, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

message: This article needs some technical explanations. What's all that stuff about 2K and 4K resolution? ··gracefool |☺ 11:55, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've broken the external links into a "service provider" and "equipment provider" list. Neither this is anywhere near complete, should we just remove all these links?--Onejaguar 00:32, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: External link?

message: I believe the independet film Urbania (2000) was a 16mm->35mm DI that was done right before O' Brother.. at Cinesite, but I didn't want to mention it as a landmark becuase I believe other independet feature-length projects were done before this, most likely in Europe. Anyone know? --Onejaguar 00:37, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Milestone films 

message: Here is what I removed.  Glennchan 06:43, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  James Bond info not notable 

message: So, wait, what's the point of spending the money for the film and everything, and then scanning it on digital? Can't you just record the movie with an HD camera without all the hassle?
* yes, but the digital intermediate process was specifically intended to relate to film post-production.
Surrealroad (talk) 21:23, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I don't get it

message: policy here
Wikipedia is neither a mirror nor a repository of links, images, or media files. All content added to Wikipedia may have to be edited mercilessly to be included in the encyclopedia. By submitting any content, you agree to release it for free use under the GNU FDL. Note that the English Wikipedia incorporates many images and some text which are considered "fair use" into its GFDLed articles. (Other language Wikipedias often do not.) See also Wikipedia:Copyrights. Wikipedia articles are not:
# Mere collections of external links or Internet directories. There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate, marking the link as such. See Wikipedia:External links and m:When should I link externally for some guidelines.
# Mere collections of internal links, except for  disambiguation pages when an article title is ambiguous, and for  structured lists to assist with the organisation of articles.
# Mere collections of public domain or other source material such as entire books or source code, original historical documents, letters, laws, proclamations, and other source material that are only useful when presented with their original, un-modified wording. Complete copies of primary sources may go into Wikisource, but not on Wikipedia. There's nothing wrong with using public domain resources such as 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica to add content to an article. See also Wikipedia:Don't include copies of primary sources and Wikisource's inclusion policy.
# Mere Collections of photographs or media files with no text to go with the articles. If you are interested in presenting a picture, please provide an encyclopedic context, or consider adding it to Wikimedia Commons. If a picture comes from a public domain source on a website, then consider adding it to Wikipedia:Images with missing articles or Wikipedia:Public domain image resources.
As such, I removed the service company listing.  Which was sort of insidious advertising with little educational/encyclopedic value anyways.  Glennchan 06:48, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia is not a collection of links 

message: The description for this topic places undue emphasis on the colour-correction part of the process, however this is not the case. A digital "intermediate" need not have any colour-correction at all, digital colour timing is a benefit of the process, perhaps even a motivating factor, but certainly not a requirement.
Surrealroad (talk) 21:23, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description is misleading 

message: Should it say "basically raping an image that already looked pretty decent"? I think not, but then what do i know.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.170.75.137 (talk) 02:53, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Digital intermediate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061113154128/http://www.theasc.com/protect/nov98/pleasantville/ to http://www.theasc.com/protect/nov98/pleasantville/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928010857/http://www.theasc.com/magazine/oct00/brother/ to http://www.theasc.com/magazine/oct00/brother/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:54, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified