lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pizotifen

message: Image needs to be cropped properly. Fuzzform 23:50, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Technology 62.201.242.71 (talk) 17:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technology 

message: The citation after the claim that pizotifen is "reasonably effective" doesn't actually support that claim, and in fact suggests the opposite, at least in children.
Could either delete the existing citation and replace it with a citation that actually supports the claim:
E.g. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501738/
Or include both but state that it is reasonably effective "in adults" and add that "it is unclear whether or not pizotifen is effective in preventing migraines in children"
Happy for any thoughts before I make any changes. Kiwi Crush Chris (talk) 00:47, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effectiveness
Talk:2006 Food City 500

message: :File:Food City 500.JPG is non-free and has been identified as possibly not being in compliance with the non-free content policy. For specific information on the problems with the file and how they can be fixed, please check the message at :File:Food City 500.JPG. For further questions and comments, please use the non-free content review page. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 11:33, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-free file problems with [[:File:Food City 500.JPG]]
Talk:Lostock Hall railway station

message: The history on this station is incorrect.  It mentions that the original station was on the other side of the road, until it got demolished - the building(s) on the other side wasn't a station, it was a Motive Power Depot (MPD) - full history on that can be found on the Lostock Hall article.  Pr3st0n (talk) 04:07, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station history
Talk:Undernet

message: doesn't this page count as an advertisement? --161.73.43.66 23:53, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops, didn't notice this page had been vandalised.  I appologize to anyone who edits this page legitimately.  Someguy1221 23:56, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Neither did I. I apologise also. ;) -161.73.43.66 23:57, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

text: At this time there is no talk in supporting the IPv6 protocol.  It is something wE can bring up to our coder-com though. WHIZZARD of UnderNet (talk) 13:48, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

message: This article has been tagged for quite some time as lacking reliable sources. Here's how to find some, including CNN and Wired: http://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&um=1&tab=wn&q=undernet+irc&ie=UTF-8 MrZaiustalk 16:19, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would love to be able to verify things, as I am one of the founders.  I just do not know how to do it in Wikipedia. WHIZZARD of UnderNet (talk) 13:48, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reliable sources

message: This is the first article I have ever viewed that had commented out meta data telling people how to conduct themselves in an article. This is wikipedia, this is not Undernet. How users choose to conduct themselves is moderated by wikipedia not undernet. Woods01 (talk) 18:00, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allow me to welcome UnderNET to wikipedia
Talk:Church & Oswaldtwistle railway station

message: Are you sure this image shows Church and Oswaldtwistle railway station? the curved platform, shelter and fences all look diferent from the other image, photographs of stations taken from trains are often get mistaken for the next down the line, unfortunatelt there are none on the ajacent two stations to compare this with 212.139.113.212 (talk) 23:03, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I need to ask my uncle, who lives in Oswaldtwistle and has been interested in railways for longer then me. Personally, I think the curve is too tight. Accrington is on a tighter curve than C&O, but the shelter doesn't look right for Accrington. --Redrose64 (talk) 13:20, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

text: I think it's Accrington - it's similar to :File:Accrington railway station in 2007.jpg. A more recent photo of Accrington, :File:Accrington Station - geograph.org.uk - 1590528.jpg (2009) shows new shelters and fences. Peter E. James (talk) 18:18, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture query
Talk:Gazi-Stadion auf der Waldau

message: ==Untitled==
Hi, I have translated the German article and added some more data where helpful (regarding the MTV HipHop Open and the final of the German Football League). I have removed the stub and unreferenced tags from the article, not sure about the marks on this page (especially the importance), so I leave it for now. Comments welcome. :) --Bimberbube (talk) 20:10, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extension of the article 

message: Hi, I have translated the German article and added some more data where helpful (regarding the MTV HipHop Open and the final of the German Football League). I have removed the stub and unreferenced tags from the article, not sure about the marks on this page (especially the importance), so I leave it for now. Comments welcome. :) --Bimberbube (talk) 20:10, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: After having improved the article (see Talk:Waldaustadion_Stuttgart#Extension of the article), I have seen that a separate page exists with the title GAZi-Stadion. The page deals with the exact same venue, so these pages should be merged. --Bimberbube (talk) 20:31, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, the other page is Gazi-Stadion. --Bimberbube (talk) 20:36, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I will place merge templates. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:40, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks, I've merged the two articles. --Bimberbube (talk) 08:16, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Rose Grove railway station

message: The main photo on this article is from 1985. Would a more recent one be welcome? I would be able to supply one. <B>Troubleshooter</B> 12:49, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi , I've just updated it with one from 2012, but feel free to add a more recent one than that if you wish. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 17:04, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent photo 

message: If anyone wants to start on resorting the lead information into a History section, please feel free. The whole style is anachronistic and is difficult to understand. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 17:04, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: History section needed
Talk:Oldham Loop Line

message: "The Oldham Loop is a branch of the Caldervale Line, diverging from that route at Thorpes Bridge Junction in Newton Heath, Manchester, and re-joining it, facing in the opposite direction at Rochdale East Junction, just north of Rochdale. Trains can, therefore run from Manchester to Rochdale and back without reversing by utilising the Oldham Loop."
In contrast the trackplan shows the Caldervale line diverging via facing points shortly after leaving Victoria and converging by trailing points and therefore in the same direction just before reaching Rochdale.  To my simple mind what the text describes should appear on the trackplan as a facing divergence beyond Rochdale. If I'm being thick please explain -- Timberframe (talk) 14:29, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The trackplan is correct - the 'Caldervale Line' going into Rochdale at the top is the line from Todmorden, not Manchester Victoria. The bit poking out at the top at Rochdale is the line back to Manchester Victoria. -- NRTurner (talk) 16:20, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Been bold and worked out how to do it myself.  Hope the additional captions illustrate NRTurner's explanation correctly. -- Timberframe (talk) 13:25, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  trackplan 

message: With the line closing October for rebuilding as extension of Manchester Metrolink should all the stations now be listed as closed.? [[Steamybrian2 (talk) 19:06, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In my opinion, no. They will be re-opening as tram stops. None of the other Metrolink stations that were converted in Phase 1 are listed on Wikipedia as closed stations. NRTurner (talk) 19:57, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: List of closed railway stations in Britain
Talk:Glass Lips

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 19:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 
Talk:Hollinwood tram stop

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Oldham Mumps railway station - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 17:20, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Rochdale railway station

message: Just a nudge that I moved the page back from Rochdale station to Rochdale railway station. The origingal page move was in good faith, due to the station now (correctly) being multi-modal as a consequence of the introduction of Metrolink. However Metrolink and TfGM continue to refer to the station/stop as "Rochdale railway station". Simillarly but separately, there is also a Rochdale bus station. Therefore, for me, this is a case where the original article title ought to be kept. --Jza84 |  Talk   10:45, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 
Talk:Oldham Mumps tram stop

message: I would argue that this article should be split into Oldham Mumps railway station for the former railway station, and Oldham Mumps tram stop, for the modern tram stop which carries its name. In the same way as Oldham Central railway station and Oldham Central tram stop are separate.
It is pretty clear that the two things are separate, as they are in different locations, and on different stretches of track, and carry a different transport mode. The only commonality between them is that the modern tram stop carries the name of the former train station. It seems a bit odd for two separate things to be squeezed into one article like this. Any thoughts? 18:00, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article split
Talk:Broadbottom

message: Who on earth is this?  Where exactly are these deeds?  Where is the reference?  Or is it just a sad joke?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.137.230.54 (talk) 16:14, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  William de Brodebothum? 

message: An intelligent page does not warrant such a comment as "It has frequently been noted on lists of unusual place names." in the opening lines.  Following links swiftly descends into the very worse schoolboy humour.  This should be removed, or a least moved to "See Also".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.150.3.116 (talk) 16:58, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:   Unusual place names.
Talk:Warren railway station

message: The link leads to the disused stations site (normally reliable), which quotes both 1.10.1915 and 1.10.1916 as the date of closure. I've changed the year to 1915 in this article, based on the date given in the book "Railway Stations of Wirral" by the Merseyside Railway History Group. Mogsy7 (talk) 14:34, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closure Date
Talk:Birkenhead Woodside railway station

message: " However, as with many other stations and rail routes in the UK, the then Chairman of the British Railways Board, Dr Richard Beeching, found the need for the terminus superfluous, as most of the routes served could also be taken from Liverpool Lime Street station, on the other side of the River Mersey"
No real evidence for this statement. Woodside was used for services to Chester, Wrexham, Shrewsbury, Birmingham and London Paddington. The services to stations south of Chester were withdrawn altogether and it can't really be said that this was because they were also served
from Liverpool (only Birmingham was served directly from Liverpool). The Chester services were truncated, starting from Rock Ferry instead. It's probably more accurate to say that the former Great Western route from London to the Midlands and the North was downgraded (and partly closed) and Woodside was closed because of this. However in the absence of EVIDENCE it might be better not to speculate either way.
Exile (talk) 19:40, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Heswall railway station

message: Should the information about the original Heswall station be on its own page? The 2 stations had no connection with each other (unlike, for example, at West Kirby). Now that Heswall Hills is known as Heswall, it may make the naming more difficult. As I understand it, the standard naming convention would include the railway company in brackets, but the line was such a mix of joint ownership that it is hard to find a definitive name for the railway! Mogsy7 (talk) 17:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, , see above. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:59, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Split?
Talk:Hadlow Road railway station

message: I think it should stay because the station/museum is 100% visual and removing it overly reduces the quality of this article. I've just given the article a copyedit and I tried to integrate these pics into the article but there isn't enough text at this time. Szzuk (talk) 18:54, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: There are presently seven images in the gallery. The whole thing is unnecessary (see WP:IG); all of them are in c:Category:Hadlow Road railway station (or its subcategories), which may be reached in one click since a  is present in the article. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:35, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Gallery
Talk:Little Sutton railway station

message: #The article needs to be expanded.
#It should make use of sections.
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
Peter I. Vardy 16:05, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 
Talk:Birkenhead Hamilton Square railway station

message: I noticed the name had been changed with the addition of Birkenhead. I have queried this because I've never seen Hamilton Square described as Birkenhead Hamilton Square. I checked here and it still says Hamilton Square. Just questioning if it needs Birkenhead on it if not identified as such?Babydoll9799 (talk) 22:20, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: See National Rail Enquiries. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:35, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: name
Talk:Dobcross

message: The spreadsheets of stats published by statistics.gov.uk that I use to concoct demography and economy sections lists Dobcross as "Dobcross/Uppermill", so I'm wondering how best to deal with this. Is there a Dobcross political ward, or should the stats be included with a caveat that Uppermill is included in the figures? Nev1 (talk) 16:03, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Dobcross might be in "Saddleworth North" ward. There is definately no Dobcross ward. I'd be tempted to use Dobcross/Uppermill - it's the nearest statistical unit we have to hand, and if written well (which it will be!), shouldn't cause any alarm. Thanks for spotting this page :) --Jza84 |  Talk   16:10, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I was hoping you'd say that, it's easier to use the spreadsheets :-) I've had a go at adding a demography section (and I've copied it over to Uppermill as well) so see what you think. I don't think it's appropriate to mention the population in the infobox (I removed the figure of 7,454 from the Uppermill infobox) as it's potentially misleading. It might warrant mentioning in the lead, but it might require too much detail so early on in the article. Nev1 (talk) 16:54, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Demography
Talk:Dukinfield

message: Hi
I have hidden Shipman as a notable person. I propose to delete it after discussion here, or if no discussion after a week or so.
He was not from Dukinfield, did not live there, did not have his practice there.
He was from Nottingham, lived in Mottram and his practice was in Hyde.
If anything the notable person would be the victim. Chaosdruid (talk) 20:44, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shipman
Talk:Birkenhead North railway station

message: Hello all... 
An image used in the article, specifically :Image:BirkenheadNorth.jpg, has a little bit of a licensing issue.  The image was uploaded back when the rules around image uploading were less restrictive.  It is presumed that the uploader was willing to license the picture under the GFDL license but was not clear in that regard.  As such, the image, while not at risk of deletion, is likely not clearly licensed to allow for free use in any future use of this article.  If anyone has an image that can replace this, or can go take one and upload it, it would be best.
You have your mission, take your camera and start clicking.--Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:35, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image needs replacement 
Talk:Leasowe railway station

message: I chose the other one simply because I thought it was better, perhaps other people beg to differ? Stuey 182 01:43, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative Image
Talk:Conway Park railway station

message: I thought it worth pointing out that the design of this station is almost identical to that used at Green Lane, barring modern construction techniques and better facilities. 88.212.174.4 02:56, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Meols railway station

message: I don't know if these are any good to anyone but I thought I would include them if others think they're better than the one I added last year to the main article Stuey 182 01:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative Images
Talk:Hamlet A.D.D.

message: Since Majel Barret-Roddenberry passed away in 2008, could some production information be found and added? 2014 is at least a six year gap until this premiered. Arcsoda (talk) 03:26, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production time?
Talk:Manor Road railway station

message: "Railway Stations of Wirral" mentions Manor Road opening in 1941, rather than 1938. I don't have any other confirmation of the date - can anyone clarify this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mogsy7 (talk • contribs) 14:36, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Haunted Harbor

message: I've removed the following:
Production of "Haunted Harbor" replaced the planned production of an adaptation of "Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea".
I think I was the one to add this piece of information in the first place.  However, I cannot find the reference for it at the moment.  - AdamBMorgan (talk) 17:48, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed production note
Talk:8 cm Granatwerfer 34

message: One of the primary German war making tools, a pillar of their entire tactical system and a feared weapon that caused a large percentage of Allied casualties suffered in infantry combat, and this is all Wikipedia as to say about it? There were probably more Allied casualties to the German mortar than fell to the MG42 and MG38 combined!
64.222.108.151 (talk) 07:43, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is it? 

message: "Brandt Mle 27/31 original French mortar design of the 1920s, after which all 3″/8 cm/81.4 mm/82 mm mortars of the Second World War era were patterned". Several sources indicate the British Ordnance ML 3-inch mortar (actually 3.209 inches/81.5 mm) was not developed from the Brandt design but was a British development of the earlier 3-inch Stokes Mortar of World War I. Johnmastell (talk) 23:01, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect claim?
Talk:Liverpool Exchange railway station

message: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7418180.stm gives a different engine and destination.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 11:12, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Last Train

message: Redrose64, you changed proper names of companies to acronyms stating it was to stop repetition. There is no repetition in the article. Introducing acronyms  confuses the lay reader. Introducing acronyms is not preventing repetition. These rail article are not for rail buffs, which all these acronyms the buffs are familiar with. Good writing does not have acronyms unless it is an accepted acronym  like AEG, ICI, etc.188.223.113.80 (talk) 10:17, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: My edits were within MOS:ACRO: by putting the acronym in parenthesis following the full term, this defines the acronym; thereafter the acronym may be used in replacement for the full term without needing to be redefined. --Redrose64 (talk) 13:41, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Acronyms
Talk:Orrell Park railway station

message: Can someone please supply opening date.Steamybrian2 (talk) 15:43, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Subsequently found date of 1906 if it can be confirmed.Steamybrian2 (talk) 15:45, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

text: 19 November 1906. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:01, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening date
Talk:Old Roan railway station

message: Can someone please supply opening date.Steamybrian2 (talk) 15:41, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: 17 February 1936. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:06, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

text: Noted this and other opening dates added. Thanks.Steamybrian2 (talk) 16:43, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening date
Talk:Town Green railway station

message: I edited a while ago to say there were no lifts at the station, but someone reverted - suggesting I disucss here.  I don;t agree.  If there are no lifts, we shoujld say there are no lifts. I use the station every day. There are no lifts!? Dbcallaghan (talk) 11:27, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Lifts
Talk:Failsworth

message: There's an interesting contemporary article about Failworth here, should the need arise. --Jza84 |  Talk   00:05, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: Woodhouses was a civil parish in the Limehurst Rural District until 1954. It was then amalgamated into Failsworth (). It is now part of Failsworth, , ), and is even given as such postally .
The M60 passes through Failsworth, by way of it passing through Cutler Hill and Woodhouses. --Jza84 |  Talk   00:05, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woodhouses 

message: Some great work going on with this article. Any chance we can apply the titular template so as to keep the article well formatted? --Jza84 |  Talk   05:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template:Citation]] 

message: Did BPC really stay in Failsworth? Really? I have never read anything that suggested that he went that way. He stayed in Manchester at the Bull's Head. Is someone getting confused?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thesectionalappendix (talk • contribs) 16:02, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bonnie Prince Charlie 

message: Woodhouses church:  --Johnsoniensis (talk) 06:26, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woodhouses
Talk:Blundellsands & Crosby railway station

message: Which of Awdry's books does this article rely on? There's no date nor full citation. Mackensen (talk) 13:39, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Duke the Lost Engine? No -  --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 16:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awdry
Talk:Waterloo railway station (Merseyside)

message: Is small town hero's redirect actually correct? The  name of the station as shown on tickets and in GBTT (neither of which I have to hand at the moment) is Waterloo (Merseyside) - though the platform signs do read 'Waterloo'. So by the ticket, Merseyside is part of the station name.  A trivial point, I know, but is there a guideline somewhere to help us with this one? Thanks. Grblundell (talk) 13:50, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  article name