Talk:Anti-Defamation League/Archive 3

message: I agree with Molloy and disagree with the other guy who reverts without discussion. --Dogtag 02:27, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Irving's website contains information relevant to the ADL 

message: ===Section 1===
I propose that we conduct a vote which shall last 5 days (beginning Wednesday, 6 July 2005 at 05:18:00 UTC. Votes closing 05:18:00 UTC, Monday, July 11, 2005):
#Concur Molloy 6 July 2005 05:38 (UTC)
#Disagree, just to undo Molloy Tomer TALK July 6, 2005 16:52 (UTC)
===Section 2===
The purpose of which is to determine if the ADL is a "biased organisation", and whether or not using texts and studies by the organization as a source in articles dealing with their "declared enemies" (such as David Irving) is un-encyclopedic:
#Concur Molloy 6 July 2005 05:38 (UTC)
#Disagree, just to undo Molloy Tomer TALK July 6, 2005 16:52 (UTC)
===Section 3===
This vote shall not consider anonymous IP addresses, nor registered wikipedians with fewer than 250 edits not directly related to this issue prior to June 6th, 2005:
#Concur Molloy 6 July 2005 05:38 (UTC)
#Disagree, just to undo Molloy Tomer TALK July 6, 2005 16:52 (UTC)
#Disagree strongly.  This is a procedural issue which affects the validity of all the votes on various points here.  This is not supported by Wikipedia:Survey guidelines.  This is also vague and unenforceable, inviting arbitrariness in determining what is "directly related".  Furthermore, people who do not meet this capricious restriction have a right to raise objections to it.  Gene Nygaard 12:58, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey on ADL bias

message: This vote shall not consider anonymous IP addresses, nor registered wikipedians with fewer than 250 edits not directly related to this issue prior to June 6th, 2005:
#Concur Molloy 6 July 2005 05:38 (UTC)
#Disagree, just to undo Molloy Tomer TALK July 6, 2005 16:52 (UTC)
#Disagree strongly.  This is a procedural issue which affects the validity of all the votes on various points here.  This is not supported by Wikipedia:Survey guidelines.  This is also vague and unenforceable, inviting arbitrariness in determining what is "directly related".  Furthermore, people who do not meet this capricious restriction have a right to raise objections to it.  Gene Nygaard 12:58, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Section 3

message: *In favor of PROPOSAL #1 (votes MUST be signed by valid Wikipedia editors):
# Concur Molloy 6 July 2005 05:38 (UTC) The ADL is a biased source
#Disagree, just to undo Molloy Tomer TALK July 6, 2005 16:52 (UTC)
#Disagree Klonimus 01:16, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Section 5 (Votes)

message: Why was the following link delete? Just wondering. --Vizcarra 06:24, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  to jpgordon 

message: The ADL is a generally left-wing group supporting affirmative action and gun control while opposing school voucher programs. These issues have little to nothing to do with Jewish Civil Rights. Would it not be more accurate to consider them a "religious left" organisation?
jme
:I have no idea if they are left-wing, but they're certainly not religious. Jayjg (talk) 19:15, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  No reference to conservative critics?