lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Simula

message: The unsubstantiated claim that Simula was the first OO is wrong. Alan Kay invented the term and he didn't like Simula at all, and he has said so. That statement was not qualified.
===Call by name===
There is an error in this code. Real s; should be initialised by 0 to make sure the empty sum gives the correct result, unless Simula initialises all Real variables to 0.
 Real Procedure Sigma (k, m, n, u);
    Name k, u;
    Integer k, m, n; Real u;
 Begin
    Real s:=0;
    k:= m;
    While k <= n Do Begin s:= s + u; k:= k + 1; End;
    Sigma:= s;
 End;  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.73.13.64 (talk) 23:04, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: The First?

message: There is an error in this code. Real s; should be initialised by 0 to make sure the empty sum gives the correct result, unless Simula initialises all Real variables to 0.
 Real Procedure Sigma (k, m, n, u);
    Name k, u;
    Integer k, m, n; Real u;
 Begin
    Real s:=0;
    k:= m;
    While k <= n Do Begin s:= s + u; k:= k + 1; End;
    Sigma:= s;
 End;  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.73.13.64 (talk) 23:04, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Call by name

message: of smalltalk! Wonder why that is? Lycurgus (talk) 06:56, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Well this is about another language, but you're right: Alan Kay invented the term OO and he created the new language because Simula was not it.
Alan Kay might have claimed that he has invented the term "object-oriented", but this is obviously wrong (the only evidence we have is his own 1993 HOPL paper); the term was used at least since the sixties; there are even a lot of computer science publications using the term before Smalltalk was even invented; see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36826762. Simula 67 is officially recognized by IEEE as the first object-oriented programming language, see https://www.ub.uio.no/fag/naturvitenskap-teknologi/informatikk/faglig/dns/filmer/simula50.html.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1210:8409:8800:3D8F:CA7D:B885:35C8 (talk) 21:54, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: not even a single mention

message: I don't want to edit it for fear it's just on my end, but it appears reference 3's link is dead. Can someone verify and fix/remove? CPPJive (talk) 18:40, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead References
Talk:Piedmont Airlines Flight 22

message: I changed the tone of the conflict of interest to more NPOV. I also added  to 2 statements that I cannot substantiate by reading the report:
#The current article says that the C-310 reported its heading to ATC, whereas all I could find is the vague 'Asheville' in the readback, which could be interpreted in many ways, but no heading ('heading' in aviation is in degrees, like '340').
#The article says that there is no 4 seconds pause in the transcript - I am not sure what is meant by that. I certainly understood from the report that there was such a pause, which was very important to explain the apparent confusion on the part of the C-310 pilot.
Any comments on the above would be welcome. Thanks, Crum375 13:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism of NTSB report
Talk:IUCN Red List endangered animal species

message: Here are some logos for animal species (for their own page) that are endangered:
http://www2.uiah.fi/~juliukko/tmp/endangered---wikipedia.jpg
At the moment they're copyrighted by me, but if you find them usable or want to use in wikipedia project, please contact me and we can make them licensed suitable for wikipedia for free of charge. please email me in that case before using them anywhere!
It is up to you to decide wether they are suitable or not. i have discussed with one member in irc about them earlier. 
email juliukko at the domain above (@uiah.fi)
 
--Murrur 13:48, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

message: This page needs copyediting in 2 respects:
* Fix redlinks. but beware:
* as it is based on a bot's work, it is full of non-English names (French, Spanish etc - not local names, these may well be included) from the IUCN Red List; these should be deleted. It is also chock-full of faulty orthography needing to be fixed. Dysmorodrepanis 06:09, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I copy edited the introduction to the article. I removed the copy edit tag because I figured that there couldn't be too many problems with the actual list, but if you see anything else, you can add it back on. Oddmartian2 15:40, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit

message: I created a list of the endangered Achatinella species, leaving Achatinella Endangered on the list. Hope it helps.
Jourdy288 (talk) 18:41, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Achatinella 

message: Per WP:OVERLINK, there is no reason to have two, three, or four links to the same article on each line of this list.  Either link to the scientific name or to the common name; there is no need to link both, unless they have separate articles for some reason.  --R'n'B (call me Russ) 21:23, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlinking
Talk:Richard Swift (musician)

message: To the editor who placed the notablity tab on this article, could you please clarify exacly why it does not meet the guideline? I added references to reviews of Richard Swift, does this not validate the article?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Richie3000 (talk • contribs) 13:48, 16 October 2006  (UTC)
:See criteria listed in WP:BAND. I'm not saying that the subject is not notable, only that there are no immediately valid citations which claim that there is. By the way, please remember to sign your comments on talk pages with ~~~~. — Tivedshambo (talk) 14:09, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: This article has been reclassified as a start due to its level of detqil. Capitalistroadster (talk) 03:17, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Reclassified as a start
Talk:Niseko, Hokkaido

message: I'd suggest that any newcomers who are interested in editing this page take a look at the Davos page. Davos is a ski-resort in Switzerland and its wikipedia page looks like more like a page from an encyclopedia. Contrast that with the Davos wikitravel page which is designed as a guide for visitors and travellers. Cheers --Saganaki- 04:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a fine example. I've done a bit to try to cut down on the tourist info, but I don't want to blank half the article - there are some things in there that, if reworded a little, could be perfectly valid encyclopedic information. So, I won't be making too drastic edits; but I will help keep an eye on this for you. Ganbare! LordAmeth 09:21, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: How the page should look

message: Hi, 
I am writing to see if some additional content can please be added to the weather section of this article? I'd like to include a paragraph providing details about where viewers can get video snow reports, web cams and additional resort information on Niseko. The following website provides all this detail, as well as for a range of other Japanese reports.
The website URL is: www.thedailyflake.com
Please advise!
Cheers
Ange  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.216.39.105 (talk) 01:32, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of content to the weather section of this article 

message: I assessed the article as Start class since I thought it was pretty deficient in coverage. The lead section starts out balanced, but the rest of the article is devoted to skiing. Other articles on towns describe the town's history, list schools, milestone dates, important religious structures, etc. Good luck. Boneyard90 (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:Japan Assessment Commentary

message: Niseko Town and the resort area Niseko are distinct in Japan. Niseko in the resort area refers to the three towns of Niseko Town, Kutchan Town, and Rankoshi Town. Hence, in the Japanese Wikipedia, "Niseko" as a resort area and "Niseko Town" are separate articles. Therefore, I propose that the description of the resort be moved from this article by creating a new article on "Niseko".--薔薇騎士団 (talk) 11:56, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: More than a month has passed since the proposal was made and no objections have been received. Therefore, we will split this article and move the description of the resort area to the new "Niseko" article. 薔薇騎士団 (talk) 21:09, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed division of this article
Template talk:User Paranormal3

message: I have to question the appropriateness of the pentagram used as the symbol for this userbox.  Perhaps something different, like the Greek letter Psi, might be more appropriate.  The pentagram is strongly connected to Wicca, which some would argue has nothing to do with the paranormal.
*Septegram*Talk*Contributions* 15:22, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symbol
Talk:Actibind

message: I've cut and pasted this section from the article on Aspergillus niger.  Will integrate into this article when time allows, unless someone beats me to it :-)  Adrian J. Hunter 13:58, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: — Assignment last updated by Natleroux (talk) 03:04, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Biochemistry I
Talk:Eastern Front (Sudan)

message: I haven't been able to find a source for the claim regarding the future referendum about merging the three Eastern states into a single state... Help, anyone? —Nightstallion (?) 13:57, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't find relevant support in the actual text of the agreement and removed the claim.  Thanks, BanyanTree 16:24, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perfect, thanks for the link! —Nightstallion (?) 16:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referendum information 
Talk:Mass renormalization

message: Please do merge this with self-energy (and put in a redirect from this page), because mass renormalization and self-energy renormalization are two terms for the same thing.  The self-energy article is currently more general, so if the merge goes forward, the mass renormalization content should perhaps be inserted as a subsection.  The current mass renormalization article contains important details that the self-energy article does not.  HEL 14:12, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Netscape Portable Runtime

message: Was it the original version of NSPR that caused Microsoft to refuse to come to any reasonable agreement with Netscape in the mid-90's, serving as the catalyst for Microsoft's anti-trust woes? AnonMoos 14:14, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added. That said, it seems that page and Wikipedia's version have both diverged a little bit from the original source from 2006. InvisibleUp (talk) 07:50, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Astrophel and Stella

message: Can somebody change the name of the page itself? It is 'Astrophil', not 'Astrophel', but there is already a redirect from 'Astrophil' to the incorrect 'Astrophel'. :)
Look at the included photo of the original text. Very clearly it is "Astrophel" not "Astrophil". m.j.hymowitz 22:06, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it really necessary to add some selected sonnets in the article when we have full text in Wikisource? --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 18:57, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selected sonnets?
Talk:Indianapolis Motor Speedway Radio Network

message: ...as the thought of NASCAR being the predominant connection of the IMSRN is rather sickening...considering it existed for seven years before Daytona itself did. --Chr.K. 22:22, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need more template connections... 

message: I added the network info box, and started the listing of the past talent...It'll take a while to fill in, but should be worthwhile when complete. Doctorindy 17:27, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding talent
Template talk:Cfd result

message: This really should have another variable for the result of the discussion, defaulting to keep; I've just seen this used for a no-consensus result, which is not the same. Septentrionalis 14:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

message: :See: Wikipedia_talk:Categories_for_discussion#Time_to_complete_the_grand_renaming.3F. -- ProveIt (talk) 15:22, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007 January 1 

message: Note:  (modeled after ) has been created that handles much of the same stuff that this template does, but it's more automated. Perhaps people could use the former, but it'd be a big switch. GracenotesT § 02:10, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New template to use

message: Sometimes things get renamed. Building the link to the discussion based on the current name may leave seekers wondering which discussion it is. if the rename wasn't obvious and or the list of discussions on the page is very long. Subst'ing the template invocation and then fixing the link by hand (to the old name so the link works) is one approach, but are there others? Perhaps a parameter that takes the full discussion name that would be used if present, and would replace use of the build it up as you go based on date and ? 136.1.1.101 20:08, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Handling categories that are renamed
Talk:Chicken fight

message: While this may still turn out to be non-notable, that should be decided in a regular deletion request. It is rather easy to find sources that this practice exists and seems to be pretty widely practiced. The fact a "sport" is only a children's game doesn't in itself make it non-notable. Seraphimblade 14:30, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Definatly exists.  in the 1960's the High School Boys would use this summer sport to show off to the girls. as noted though, it is now frowned upon due to safety concerns and public pools especially (falling could hit head on cement edge) may have brought the game to extinction to city boys in current generations.  Qazwiz (talk) 21:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: maybe i should note, that it also would be played on land but in a large area like an open area in a picnic grounds Qazwiz (talk) 21:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Undisputed deletion tag removed
Talk:Tal Gambit

message: There is currently a discussion on Wikipedia talk:No original research on whether chess engine analysis constitutes OR. If it is, then much of the content here will have to go. youngvalter 14:33, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

message: I added the cleanup tag.  I think this article needs a lot of work to bring it up to standard.  First I think that all of the Crafty evaluations should be taken out.  Secondly, I'm dubious about the play result percentages.  General editing is needed too. Take the "recomended for ..." out of the section titles, etc. Bubba73 (talk), 03:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I tagged McDonnell Attack last night.  I found another one that used Crafty analysis - I'll have to find it again.  Bubba73 (talk), 14:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That one is rewritten, and I have redirected this page to the McDonnell. Perhaps some analysis from here could be used, but it looked awfully biased towards certain lines ("recommended for White" and so on...), history remains intact regardless. Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:49, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

text:  Smith-Morra Gambit and Queen's Gambit Declined, Mainline Orthodox Defense also use Crafty evaluations.  Bubba73 (talk), 14:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup
Talk:Richard Vander Wende

message: This article starts off in the middle of discussing this person.  It violates Wikipedia standards by not stating the obvious.  All articles on people should state who the person is, and what they do.  For example, Tom Hanks is an American actor.  I would fix this article myself, but I don't know what he is (a special effects wizard?).  Someone who is familiar with his work, please fix. — Frecklefoot | Talk 14:39, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I fixed it and wrote it based on what the tidbet says. Someone else can come around and correct it if I got it wrong. --Lendorien 18:07, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Who is he?

message: Should this article be in the Myst games category? Richard Vander Wende did work on Riven, but he was not a Myst game. 68.160.171.168 15:00, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 
Talk:Monte Coleman

message: I found a brief stub. Did my best. I think a discussion of his incredible workout ethic and the "Christian Stuff" - the ministry etc. could be explored and maybe some meorable moments -like holding his Helmet up in the filmclip of the early Superbowl/Playoff run (couldn't find exact enough dates to do it though).
Khan Noonian Singh 14:42, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Royal Naval Auxiliary Service

message: http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=site:*.gov.uk+%22Royal+Naval+Auxiliary+Service%22&hl=en&hs=mV8&lr=&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&filter=0
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=site:*.gov.uk+%22Royal+Navy+Auxiliary+Service%22&hl=en&hs=mV8&lr=&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&filter=0
seems that the Government use both!
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=site:*.mod.uk+%22Royal+Naval+Auxiliary+Service%22&hl=en&hs=mV8&lr=&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&filter=0
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=site:*.mod.uk+%22Royal+Navy+Auxiliary+Service%22&hl=en&hs=mV8&lr=&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&filter=0
and the MoD aren't much more help!
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hs=21n&hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=site%3A*.parliament.uk+%22royal+Naval+Auxiliary+Service%22&btnG=Search&meta=cr%3DcountryUK%7CcountryGB
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hs=21n&hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=site%3A*.parliament.uk+%22royal+Navy+Auxiliary+Service%22&btnG=Search&meta=cr%3DcountryUK%7CcountryGB
Hansard is slightly more in favour of Naval, but there is still ambiguity here.
There is a slight weighting in favour of Naval here, but I'm not going to take this as the proof one way or the other. Can anyone clear this up definitely? Emoscopes Talk 14:48, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Naval or Navy?
Talk:Colegio San Agustin Bacolod

message: Nice work. You have improved the page
Cor Unum 12:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Bagumbayan–Volunteers for a New Philippines which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 13:16, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Negros Revolution

message: Was there some inspiration from the Spanish Cantonal Revolution of 1868? --84.20.17.84 08:34, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cantonal 

message: Gin 49.147.155.164 (talk) 15:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Araling panlipunan
Talk:Aniceto Lacson

message: By: estudyante_blues@rocketmail.com
This article is fair enough. Due to publication constraints, many of our history in Negros Occidental never gone to print. Moreover, there are a handful of genuine historians who made astonishing or breakthrough research on the said topic. And this is the very reason why if one has to write an article like this, most probably you will have to work on the knowledge you have acquire thru verbal history. And if there exist a printed material(s), you may not be able to have one because of its price and scarcity. So to the readers, don't expect a host of citations will be posted by the writer.
One last thing. The picture of the statute shown in this article is NOT Aniceto Lacson but Andres Bonifacio. The statute of Aniceto Lacson, rather, can be found just across the street where that statute of Andres Bonifacio is erected - Talisay City, Negros Occidental. Unlike the full body statute of Bonifacio, Lacson's statute is only a half size statute standing over a rectangular tiled platform. 
This is a very common mistake of a tourist when visiting the site. In fact, the most well-known of this was when a former president  Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo visited the place, she boasted and claimed to the national media that the statute was that of the great Aniceto Lacson who was his husband's grand father - Miguel Arroyo (who belongs to the landed elite in Negros whose family is closely related with the Lacson clan). However, someone whispered her that that is not Aniceto Lacson but rather Andres Bonifacio. So, to discontinue the shame she immediately got on the presidential car and leave. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.58.149 (talk) 20:43, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ON LACK OF CITATION; ERROR IN THE PICTURE POSTED;
Talk:Chippenham (disambiguation)

message: Changing the redirect to a disambiguation page broke several incoming links, so I reverted it.
According to WP:DAB there is no need for a disambiguation page with only 2 entries.  Chippenham, Wiltshire (the town) and Chippenham, Cambridgeshire (the village) are properly disambiguated at the top of the article.  --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 14:54, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Town or village the primary topic?

message: It is not normal to disambigaute sub-topics of places.  Why are 
* Chippenham railway station
* Chippenham (UK Parliament constituency)
* Chippenham Town F.C.
here when they can be read about and linked to for further information at Chippenham, Wiltshire? --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 13:17, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added these while I was disambiguating the incoming links using popups - it saves work.  I'm quite happy to remove them now. CarolGray 13:59, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm all for saving work.  Wish I had thought of that. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 16:43, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sub-topics
Talk:Juan Araneta

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:22, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Silay

message: There is a discussion regarding the removal of the word "city" from the article titles of Philippine cities.  This may imminently affect the article name for .  For city names which are not unique, disambiguation alternatives are also being presented.  Formal request for page move may follow after a reasonable time of discussion.  If you wish to participate, please post your comments here.  --JinJian (talk) 04:34, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: <Cityname> 
<City>


message: I wonder, why the Mandaluyong City is the sister city of the Silay City? I don't even know that while I have stayed here at the Silay City. Please reply me. It doesn't connect anything. ▒hÅ╓Θ╚DΦ|≈ ▓ 09:17, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sister City
Talk:West Anglia Main Line

message: Is there any reason Stansted Mountfitchet is listed as being on the Stansted Airport branch, when (as far as I can tell) it's on the mainline? --88.109.229.4 15:03, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stansted Mountfitchet 

message: As far as I know, no extensions are required at Bishops Strotford and Tottenham Hale- they've been 12 carriage stations for a long time.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cambridge al (talk • contribs) 14:50, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Platform Extensions 

message: I am looking to update this page over the next few months to improve the history and information available on this line. if you are interested in helping please contact me via my talk pageDavidvaughanwells (talk) 23:50, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  updating page
Talk:International Lyrics Server

message: An old screenshot of this would be useful. --Anthony5429 15:09, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reqscreenshot 

message: why this site was shut down, and yet now there are a billion and six responses to $SONGTITLE lyrics at Google; did someone gin up a way for those sites to pay someone for the privilege and the money's going back to the songwriters?  Or did the publishers just give up after whacking the only *decent* site?--Baylink (talk) 16:31, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does anybody have the first clue