lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Femme Fatale (song)

message: Her cover of Femme Fatale was previously mentioned in this article but was deleted by someone who checked on Deezer and argued that it wasn't the same song. Wrong. The problem was that the song's title was mixed with another song on the album. Here's the right one (albeit with the wrong title), but I'll defy anyone to argue that it's not a cover of Femme Fatale. Here : http://www.deezer.com/en/music/track/2264459  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.226.231.127 (talk) 16:36, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Émilie Simon 

message: No mention of "femme" being pronounced on the recording as spelt, and not as in French ?
85.255.233.169 (talk) 05:47, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Do reliable sources discuss it? If not, no mention. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:01, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Lyrics
Talk:Something in the Way

message: I think there should be some mention of the song being recorded with Cobain laying on a couch in the control room of the recording studio.  This was discussed in the VH1 Classic Albums special about Nevermind. - ZEROpumpkins 11:42, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Cites no sources and doesn't read like an enclyclopaedic entry. ScarianTalk 04:25, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article clean up

message: Is there some reason not to have an article on this particular song? — CharlotteWebb 01:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative music and its Nirvana taskforce decided to redircect song articles that did not fulfill notability guidelines to warrant separate articles. WesleyDodds (talk) 01:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would argue that appearing on the soundtrack of two major films, being released as a B-side of a Nirvana single, and being covered by seven other bands are by themselves sufficient assertions of the song's "notability". — CharlotteWebb 01:56, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, not really. It was never released as a single (thus having no commercial impact), and commentary by critical sources is low. Your points basically just establish "it's been used places". There's nothing inherently notable about that. WesleyDodds (talk) 01:58, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was released as the B-side of About a Girl, not that it matters. An article about a song recorded by eight bands (what's that, about one every other year?) ought to be kept as a navigational route between the pages about said bands and their albums, even the article itself is a stub, which this obviously isn't. We may agree to disagree about how much is lost by redirecting it, but I shall maintain the belief that nothing is gained by doing so. — CharlotteWebb 02:25, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Eight covers does not constitute notability. WesleyDodds (talk) 13:25, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "Consensus"

message: There's not more evidence besides the recent biography that he co-wrote it, but we might not ever be able to confirm it. Should Lanegan stay in the "writers" section on the infobox? Crazyeditor23 (talk) 16:10, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say Lanegan should be removed from the info box because Oliveri is not necessarily reliable and could be biased. Why haven't we heard this information before ? QuintusPetillius (talk) 18:42, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

text: No, Lanegan should not stay in the "writers" section on the infobox. Shouldn't the infobox only list the writers who were actually credited on the album as the songwriter? If you want to add a section in the article about who else should have been credited fine, but the infobox should contain who is actually credited. Dtjunkie (talk) 22:28, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mark Lanegan" co-writer?
Talk:Scentless Apprentice

message: What?! No, this article is way better than Serve the Servants or Dumb, it passes WP:SONGS. There is (or was) enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article. Bye. Tezkag72 (talk) 13:20, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: The song is definitely not in a BPM of 115, it's more like 85.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.22.196.181 (talk) 19:56, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tempo
Talk:Bell's spaceship paradox

message: This is Kirk McDonald, author of ref 38 of the Wike page on Bell's Spaceship Paradox: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bell%27s_spaceship_paradox  I would like to update this reference to read: Kirk T McDonald (2022) "Constant Acceleration and the Equivalence Principle", http://kirkmcd.princeton.edu/examples/equivalence.pdf   In any case, the present link is obsolete, and is now http://kirkmcd.princeton.edu/examples/accel.pdf   I've tried to edit the refenences to the Wike page, but they are somehow "hidden".  kirktmcdonald@gmail.com Kirktmcdonald (talk) 00:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Dmr2 (talk) 17:38, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update ref. 38
Talk:Tourette's (song)

message: "(after a lot of research)" with no source, original research?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.92.12.196 (talk) 06:47, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research 

message: Should it be there?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Belchey (talk • contribs) 04:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hardcore punk
Talk:Pomfret (disambiguation)

message: Does anybody reading this page know of the origins of Pomfret as a surname?
Yes.  The name derives from "Pontefract" in Yorkshire.  I have visited there several times whilst researching my family tree, as my surname is "Pomfret".  The Library and Museum in Pontefract has quite a lot of useful information on the history of Pontefract (Pomfret).  Especially on Pontefract Castle which was a royalist castle in the days of Charles I and when it was captured by Oliver Cromwell, he had it demolished and sold off the contents.   
I also have a question re the Pomfret fish.  Does anyone know how it came to be named Pomfret?
--203.214.49.8 11:52, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wide-Boy 64

message: So, it's recently came to my attention that there are, in fact, two different Wide-Boy64 units.
First up, there's the original Wide-Boy64
This unit was later renamed the Wide-Boy64 CGB
These two units worked on the Nintendo 64 and played original Game Boy and Game Boy Color games.  The unit was renamed when the Wide-Boy46 AGB was released:
The AGB version of the Wide-Boy64 plays Game Boy, Game Boy Color and Game Boy Advance games.
Now, I stole these images from two eBay auctions and a third website, so they probably can't be used in the article...
TheUncleBob (talk) 16:28, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 and a half WideBoys.
Talk:Honda NH series

message: Hi folk, I have just recently obtained a honda lead NH50-D and im currently reparing it and i can tell you that it has an electronic starter and a kick start, it also has a fuel gauge.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.73.92.160 (talk) 18:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  HONDA LEAD s POWER EXAUST
Talk:Thomas Arbuthnot

message: I checked the validity of the DNB reference which was added yesterday, and found that the text of the article was a very lightly rewritten version of the text of the article in the Dictionary of National Biography, at http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/613 (note that to access it, you need to be a subscriber or to have access through an institution such as a public library).
I have therefore removed all substantive text from the article, leaving it with only an infobox and categories, tagged it with , and listed it at Wikipedia:Copyright_problems#2007-05-31.
It does appear from the article's history that there are some earlier stubby versions which are not merely light edits of the DNB text, and it may' be possible to revert to one of those versions, if they are sufficiently substantive to be worth retaining.
The copyvio material appears to have been added in this edit on 18 May by User:Frendraught, so it might be OK to revert to the previous version by User:Kittybrewster.
However, it might be better to delete this article and start again, so I leave it for discussion here to determine what course of action would be best. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:11, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "the text of the article was a very lightly rewritten version of the text of the article in the Dictionary of National Biography, at http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/613" – That's right. The new ODNB uses the same public domain source, the old DNB. As I stated here, the original autor is A. J. Arbuthnot, date of the original publication is 1885. Alexander John Arbuthnot died in 1907, so everything he wrote is in the public domain now. You can see the same phenomenon in the EB. They too – making their lives easier – use their old, public domain material from the 1911 EB, sometimes slightly rewritten, sometimes not. Greetings, --Frendraught 09:54, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Frendraught, thanks for that info. I'm removing the copyvio tag based on your information. In such cases, it is especially important to note the source you're taking the text from, not just listing it in references. Talk page is good for giving such details, which are unimportant except when tracing copyvio allegiations. --Alvestrand 22:38, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation from DNB
Talk:LonWorks

message: What is the bandwidth of LonWorks? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.229.39.150 (talk • contribs) .
:Each message is 228 bytes long, so the bandwidth consumed increases as a multiple of that.There is nothing in the LonTalk protocol that limits the communication speed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Back ache (talk • contribs) .
::It depends on which physical layer we're discussing. "Free topology" runs slower than, say 1.25 Mb/s RS-485.
::Atlant 21:36, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Standard LON network is 78kbps. Slow by today's standards, but quite robust. This seems like a useful addition to the article. Aaron Lawrence 01:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Doesn't this article need a "See also" section, mentioning other similar standards, and/or a "Categories" link, as in the CAN-bus article? Bolkhov (talk) 10:00, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "See also"/"Categories"
Talk:Animal welfare and rights in Israel

message: Article needs more sources - also sounds NPOV  given that there is debate over whether kosher/halal slaughter is more or less humane than other forms. For those who feel it's less humane then Israel and the Muslim world would rank low on animal rights given the universal practice of kohser/halal in those countries. Homey 09:59, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Nietzsche contra Wagner

message: Please, someone, anyone with more knowledge than me on this, with better skills than I have-- feel free to expand this article!
-Bordello 10:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Blast. I hope you don't mind, but I'm simply not going to read that but will disagree with it anyway. Cheers. -Bordello 21:54, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How enlightened of you, dear. Druworos (talk) 17:29, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand!

message: Bordello, please please please, before RE-inserting the phrase "five years after his death", look at Nietzsche, why dont you, or check ANY book. Nietzsche died in 1900, therefore, 1895, the date of publication, is five years BEFORE, NOT after, his death. Druworos 19:40, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I screwed up. Sorry. Don't get your panties in a bundle and I won't mine. Cool?
-Bordello 01:10, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nietzsche's Death

message: Nietzsche’s 1871 fragment On Music and Words expressed his Schopenhauerian conviction that music is primary and that words, lyrics, and poetry are secondarily derivative. Therefore, I am adding it to the "See also" section. According to Schopenhauer, music directly expressed will, the very essence of everything; words symbolized mere phenomenal objects.Lestrade (talk) 15:42, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Primacy of Music

message: This article has no citations apart from another Wikipedia article. Please revise and resubmit. Grey Feline (talk) 10:42, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs citations.
Talk:John Passmore Edwards

message: His surname is Passmore Edwards Gordo 10:06, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bruce Reynolds

message: I have removed the sentence "A third multi-million dollar film based on the event, Steal is in pre production by 10-21 Films in London.", as it is undated, unsourced and neither Google nor IMDB searches turn up any results either for the title or the company. Asav (talk) 14:01, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Steal (film)]] 

message: British group, Alabama 3 recorded a tribute to Bruce Reynolds 'Have You Seen Bruce Richard Reynolds' on their 2005 album Outlaw.
I don't think it's accurate that Bruce Reynolds himself appears on the track, but a nephew of his (or other relative) does.
Why don't you believe that? This information also appears on the CD cover see http://www.amazon.co.uk/Outlaw-Alabama-3/dp/B0009FHKSQ - His son is the drummer of the band  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.44.45.222 (talk) 12:03, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alabama 

message: It could be said in this article that towards the end of his life, Bruce Reynolds tried to be a celebrity  - as a newsreader on 
Radio Four said that many criminals do. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 19:55, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Trying to be a celebrity

message: The summary area shows: Spouse(s) Frances (until her death). This is contradicted in the final paragraph of the Career section by the statement: "Now divorced and looking to make a living".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ph73nt (talk • contribs) 13:43, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spouse 
Talk:Moody Church

message: If anyone has a digital image of Moody Church that they would be willing to upload, that would make a nice enhancement to this article. DFH 10:23, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any one have a picture? 

message: That's the full name of A. C. Dixon who pastored Moody Church after Moody’s death. DFH 22:02, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amzi Clarence Dixon
Talk:Concrete recycling

message: I disagree with the merger, reasons stated on the Recycling page.--Anchoress 10:27, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think off the top of my head that's a good idea, although I don't know if articles for those other types of recycling already exist? Could you look Kpeyn, I don't even really know what to look for.--Anchoress 21:39, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree with the merger. This article needs to cover the techniques and processes associated with concrete recycling which will differ greatly from plastic recycling for example.--Alex 11:41, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Recycling]] 

message: @Dustfreeworld If it is still unbalanced please could you explain how - thanks  Chidgk1 (talk) 09:49, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the article still unbalanced?
Talk:Diss song

message: I think the name of this article should be Diss track instead of diss song. I have never heard "diss song" before this. What do you think? RealFerrari 21:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Is there a source on "Drop a Gem On 'Em"? I never found the song. License2Kill 17:01, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the reason it is not included is because Biggie denied that it was. --Ted87 23:45, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is This Real

message: Please stop adding the track, it has already been added to the list License2Kill 18:39, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Takeover '06

message: Does anyone here think the songs need to be in order?--EliteMike 19:48, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: put the songs in order?

message: Know your hip-hop slang. It's "dis." Peace. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.237.104.58 (talk) 21:07, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The correct spelling is "dis," not "diss." 

message: *I probably should have had this page on my watch list, but I just now had the unpleasant surprise of discovering that after the article "List of diss songs" was deleted here without any consensus to merge, it was simply replaced by User:Reinyday, who didn't even participate in the discussion.  Now, I can assume good faith here and believe he was simply not aware of the AfD, but nevertheless, I have deleted the list and unless the list itself (and its contents) are restored via a deletion review, it should not be replaced.  I'm quite upset at this backdoor attempt to get around a valid AfD. JuJube 04:17, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of diss songs 

message: I think this article is way too small to survive on its own and I think it would be better for all of this to be merged into Dissing (where the content is now). User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 15:16, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:One Piece: Grand Battle!

message: This page is in a state!  You can't read the info... It has useless bits and bobs that are not needed.  Okay we need to work on this page - Badly!!! Angel Emfrbl 10:36, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What a mess!!!
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Alienus/Proposed decision

message: "Alienus banned 1) For edit warring, personal attacks, and incorrigibility, Alienus is banned from editing Wikipedia for one year."
Let the record clearly show that I have nothing whatsoever to gain from this statement.  I've virtually retired from Wikipedia since approximately one month ago.  I am being attacked in an ArbCom case between other editors, and haven't bothered even to defend myself.  I hardly ever agree with Alienus.  I reported him for 3RR months ago, and his block was extended for personally attacking me.
Nevertheless, as one who's followed his talk page ever since those days - and seen the low points like the foreskin edit summary - I am compelled to observe that Alienus has markedly improved.  He is *not* incorrigable, nor is he any longer a font of personal attacks, or an "edit warrior" any more than (rightly or wrongly) your average Wikipedia editor who has reverts and user them - often, it'd seem, quite rightly. 
Lately, he seems to have been blocked a whole lot for, charitably put, insubstantial violations of policy.  It appears that he's been held to a standard that dozens of perfectly respectable editors I could name off the top of my head do not meet, and it seems crazy to me that he'd be banned now.  Perhaps earlier this year, I'd have agreed, and if that period is the basis of this action, I can offer no defense.  But if the question is probable future conduct, from my admittedly limited experience I'm inclined to say I've no reason to believe that Alienus poses any threat of substantial disruption.Timothy Usher 10:36, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

message: According to those who know him better, user:Alienus has returned to editing using two IP addresses,  and . However since this case was never completed there is no foul. Can we close this case? -Will Beback 01:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like a straightforward case to me:, .Timothy Usher 02:01, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

text: You should be aware of this diff on his talk page as well:  Isopropyl 06:32, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alienus returns
Talk:Rock 'n' Roll Washington DC Marathon

message: Edited the redirect & the page name to reflect that the 2006 National Marathon was not sponsored by Wirefly, and that sponsorship changes in the future shouldn't result in changing the location of the page and changing the page to a redirect.  Therefore, I'm redirecting Wirefly National Marathon to National Marathon and reverting the previous redirect. CruiserBob 00:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mohiniyattam

message: Wiki Raja 10:32, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Dravidian civilizations

message: This article is about the dance form, hence moving the list of exponents/awardees here, probably best to move them to a dedicated list article. Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 09:44, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Rekha Raju DS 2.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on April 10, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-04-10. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:15, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Rekha Raju DS 2.jpg]] to appear as POTD 

message: Mohiniyattam 2409:4073:11:140A:0:0:831:88A0 (talk) 04:53, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project 

message: வரலாறு 2404:160:801F:4584:1:1:8812:71CB (talk) 07:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  மோகினி ஆட்டம் வரலாறு 
Talk:Young Greens of England and Wales

message: I've copied what follows from the Green Party of England and Wales discussion page, and have made some editorial changes in line with reducing the size of linked passages and not overlinking.
Gordon 16:00, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting issues 

message: The definite article is not used at the start of this article but is used elsewhere.  The YG constitution doesn't use it but elsewhere I think it is usually (but not always) used.  Perhaps, a parenthesis would be appropriate; however, it should still be consistent in the article.
Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 10:48, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of Definite Article 

message: I think the names of the committee members are irrelevant to the reader as none of them are well-known.  There seems to be a trend to add them to organisation articles.  Maybe we should have a policy on this. Any opinions?
Also, I prefer definition lists to tables for this sort of thing.  (However, table might look nicer and it would be hard to make a def. list look like a table.)  WP is relatively HTML non-compliant, anyway, unfortunately.
Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 18:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. -- tariqabjotu (joturner) 00:11, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Committee Members

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support entirely agree. Warofdreams talk 16:36, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/geography/staff/jenny_pickerill/publications has some info on this network. She interviewed self-identifying members in 1999 so it was in existence then.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.249.23.158 (talk) 13:58, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Green Student Network
Talk:Street Fighter (TV series)

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Yes! Yes! and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 16#Yes! Yes! until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 20:19, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Yes! Yes!" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Isn't this the wrong original air date?　The air date of the crossover episode is November 16, 1996 for Wing Commander Academy and Mortal Kombat, so based on that, I think the last episode is December 21, 1996, which is correct, taking into account the one week break. Ss3162000 (talk) 06:51, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original air date