lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Peter Bergen

message: Hi, I've made a few edits to this page to make it more neutral. Is it okay now, or do you have any suggestions for how to improve it? Thanks!24.254.43.165 (talk) 16:23, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Wonderful edits. Can't disagree with any of them. --YeOldeGentleman (talk) 20:24, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: Does anyone have any suggestions for how to resolve the maintenance template at the top of the page? The article appears to be neutral on its face and it does not appear to contain content that is gratuitously promotional. 162.201.168.73 (talk) 15:32, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement maintenance template
Talk:Bhadravati, Maharashtra

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* The coords for this location point to Bhadravati, Karnataka, not Bhadravati, Maharashtra.
Xrdeem (talk) 01:57, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: For the record, I've merged in the contents of Bhadravati, Maharashtra/version 2, which had started life at Bhadrawati in August 2007, the history is still there. FlagSteward (talk) 10:27, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Bhadravati(Chandrapur) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 26#Bhadravati(Chandrapur) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 22:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bhadravati(Chandrapur)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Peter Blauner

message: the link to the novel "the intruder" goes to a children's book by another author  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.6.110.9 (talk) 02:31, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Virtually everything in this article now has at least one source citation. Several facts have two sources. Anything remotely resembling promotional material has been taken out. Yet there are still two paragraphs at the top claiming the article sounds like a "news release" and needs additional verification. Since all issues have been addressed, citations have been added with ISBN numbers for books, and even factual material with citations has been removed, it's hard to understand what the problem is. Why does these derogatory paragraphs remain? And what can be done to remove them?
McCranky (talk) 09:55, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request
Talk:Nikolai Girenko

message: I deleted rather large pieces of text. I don't see how they  are specifically related to Girenko. Please prove the relevance using references to reliable sources. Lom Konkreta (talk) 21:33, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The text refers to articles on investigation of the racist gangs Shultz-88 and Mad Crowd supposedly involved in the murder of Girenko.  The articles suggest that Yevgheny Vyshenkov revealed suspected perpetrators among the Mad Crowd members in January-February 2006 and published his findings in Tainy Sovetnik in May 2006.  I believe the wording of the text does not pretend on absolute truth, in accord with the neutral point of view policy. --ilgiz (talk) 00:57, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I am repeating again: the text in question does not discuss Girenko.  This artuicle is about Girenko, not about various hate crimes investigations in Russia. If you disagree (and I am lack the ability to read carefully), please cite the text from this pieces which you think is related to Girenko. Lom Konkreta (talk) 18:51, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

text: Thanks, Bob, your advice does have its merits. However I don't think that every band of hoodlums is desreved to be detailed in wikipedia, with all their ddeds and convictions. At the same time I do agree that a good analytical article makes sense on the subject. However it should not be an original essay or a list compiled from newspapers.  It must be based on analytical publications. I am sure there are plenty of them. There are 'tens of thousands such events. Some russian neonazi groups are notable too. Ant they deserve wikipedia articles. But not a team of 6 skinheads with flashy self-name. Lom Konkreta (talk) 23:52, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  My deletion 

message: The killers of Girenko are condemned now, they are no more «anonymous». Please make corrections in Racism in Russia article, too. Zooh (talk) 08:07, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Killers 
Talk:Peter Bowler (cricketer)

message: There seem to be a lot of inaccuracies in this article: 241 in NatWest Trophy? playing for Derbyshire in 2001? I'll have a go at it over the next few days but am somewhat busy IRL. Johnlp (talk) 17:26, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual accuracy 

message: Please see Talk:Peter Bowler. --Dweller (talk) 10:45, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
Talk:Peter Carter (nurse)

message: Just a note to say that unsourced additions regarding some kind of white-wash conspiracy are violations of policy on biographies of living persons.  That is, they are  controversial claims that are not supported by any reliable source, or have been constructed by combining reliable sources.  This policy is not taken lightly, so any re-adding it without very good cites that verify everything being said if likely to get the article protected from editing and those adding it blocked. Please think carefully before doing this.  Do you have a good reliable source that can them back up, without it being speculative, non-neutral, soapboxing or original synthesis?  --Escape Orbit (Talk) 23:35, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP violations
Talk:Bodwad

message: u no that our President Mahamahim Pratibhatai patil born at nadgaon tal. bodwd  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.183.160.185 (talk) 06:40, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  President village 

message: You are invited to work on Ahirani language wiki at  Ahirani Wikipedia in incubation . Mahitgar (talk) 04:36, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ahirani Wikipedia in incubation
Talk:Gerardus Vossius

message: *Because he was born in the Palatinate, on his parents' travels, someone has made Vossius' nationality "German" [sic]. There is no need to wrangle over his "German citizenship" one would hope. --Wetman 05:11, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Cabo Frio

message: Does it really get cold there? It's above the Tropic of Capricorn! Sagittarian Milky Way 09:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Ok. WTH? I come from Cabo Frio and never, ever heard of it. Specially of been "popular tourist attraction" Samuel Sol 18:57, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can probably use the Cape Frio redirect page. Just include a hatnote at the top of each article pointing to the other one. --Carioca (talk) 19:30, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Drag Performance?

message: There is also a Cape Frio in Namibia at 18°26'12"S 12°00'17"E Peter (Southwood) (talk): 07:13, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You can probably use the Cape Frio redirect page. Just include a hatnote at the top of each article pointing to the other one. --Carioca (talk) 19:30, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cape Frio, Namibia 
Talk:Budhwar Peth, Pune

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—223.227.3.24 (talk) 19:09, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't explained what you think is wrong with the coordinates currently in the article, and both Google Maps and Open Street Map show Budhwar Peth as being where those coordinates indicate. If you still think that the coordinates are erroneous, please post a message below, including the  template and clearly explaining what you think the error to be. Someone will then be along to deal with the matter. Deor (talk) 10:20, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate 

message: I want to shee this place Sinha Nirmal (talk) 19:16, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  how to visit
Talk:Peter Crowther

message: needs a list of his editing credits. he has edited a number of anthologiesPleasantville 21:42, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'd opine that the article itself is sufficient. Markjoseph125 (talk) 04:19, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed notability tag
Talk:Peter D. Klein

message: The picture at  looks nothing like the picture on the article. I just saw him at Rutgers today, he looks nothing like the picture. Is there an error, or is the picture just an old one? 68.197.187.215 (talk) 02:19, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect picture?
Talk:Peter Drury

message: fix it  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.7.242.215 (talk) 11:39, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Peter Eastman (software engineer)

message: The sources seem to marked as "External links". What is on the page comes, at least for the most part, from those. I don't remember if there were reference markings on the page before or if they have, for some reason, been removed?
Is there a deadline for immediate deletion? Or what is the time frame in which corrections need to be made?
Peteihis (talk) 14:06, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Peter Elbow

message: I am in an MA program in Rhetoric and Writing and can safely say that Peter Elbow is one of the most respected scholars within writing pedagogy and composition studies.  I'm going to remove the notability tag from the article; perhaps when the semester is finally (finally!) over, I'll try to give the article a good edit. --Roman à clef 12:15, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is almost nothing but puffery; it needs to be cut by about 80%. Languagehat (talk) 15:19, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: The Cut and Paste Technique section was removed and this was not meant to offend the original person who inserted it. My class is doing a project and part of that project involves editing a Wikipedia page-we picked Peter Elbow. Slightly overwhelmed with where and how to begin, we e-mailed Peter Elbow and asked for any bit of information he has to offer. He, very graciously, provided us with an abundance of information. Part of his reply e-mail involved him instructing us to remove the cut and paste technique section because it is not a major focus of his-he wanted us to focus more attention to the free writing section and that is what we did. Thank you for understanding.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amy acaba (talk • contribs) 21:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re. Cut & Paste Technique 

message: Looks like there may be some unacknowledged redundancies between old and new sections of the article; one pair that stands out as worth combining is "The Bartholomae / Elbow Debate" and "Being a Writer vs. Being an Academic": the latter article was a revised-for-print version of Elbow's part in the official discussion at CCCC. I'm sure there are other instances in the article as it stands in which new material could be usefully integrated with old material, and the overall article made more concise. --Benmiller314 (talk) 04:38, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fat Draft 

message: There is a lot of sourcing to primary sources here, but besides that...  it looks like some of the article uses an (unpublished?) email interview between Elbow and students as a reference.  I would appreciate someone else take a look at this.  I am inclined to remove the material as original research.  --Ds13 (talk) 17:26, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research?
Talk:Peter Fill

message: Italy had many very well downhill racers like Marcello Varallo, Stefano Anzi, Michael Mair, Kristian Ghedina or Peter Runggaldier - but now, in 2015/16, Peter was the first to achieve.  --213.225.10.48 (talk) 15:54, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Word Cup Alpine Downhill title for Italy 
Talk:Franciscus Gomarus

message: Are articles based on the 1911 Encyclopedia sacrosanct?  I have noticed several ones which use archaic terms, and this is one: generally the city name "Dordrecht" is not used, but instead "Synod of Dort" is the acceptable term.
Itahist 18:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:House dance

message: I removed the notice to delete this article. House dancing is an important underground movement with a wide audience, primarily among young people in the inner city. It is connected with at least a few marginalized groups, African Americans and gay people, and as such does not receive much publicity. I did, however, provide more documentation and external links that I believe prove its notability.
House dance is connected with gay people? Now this is biased and, by the way, completely wrong. but unless you don't write this into the article, I will do you no harm.
80.120.199.87 21:15, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I made a few grammatical corrections.  Proper names capitalized, etc.  It's just the teacher in me.
-Lanceroo 21:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor Fixes 

message: What is the basis for the assertion that House dance is "a lot older than House music"?  There is no qualifying information provided and no reference. AFAIK they emerged simultaneous from the same cultural movement -- which explains their common underlying philosophy (i.e. the non-isochronous metrical foundation). Andyschm 06:22, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: it should be noticed that housedance spread to east asia and later europe where it is as well as in the US still alive and evolving  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabianooo (talk • contribs) 17:24, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  contemporary house dance 

message: It appears the article says that the article is not related to Hip Hop culture, which it isn't, directly, historically, as cited.
However, the article disputes that 'house dance' did not come from the streets, this may imply to the reader it is not a vernacular dance, 'vernacular dances' are often called 'street dances', in the sense that such dances evolved outside studios.
Below there is commentary from a third person:
"Before there were many 'disco' clubs, also known as 'houses'. Vernacular dances are practiced in and out of nightclubs, and improved on (usually socially), as cited in the Vernacular dance article. Vernacular dances were dubbed as 'street dances' for their practice in the streets (especially before dances at actual parties), the term 'house dance' was in no doubt a play on words between 'street dance' and 'house', replacing 'street' with 'house', since the subjected dance styles were danced indoors within nightclubs to disco or house music rather than in dance halls or outside to funk, jazz or hip hop music, etc.
It just appears to me the parent article says it is a street dance, yet, this article says it is not - perhaps the writer confused 'hip hop dance' with 'street dance'? Both hip hop and house/disco dance styles were descended from funk, along with their corresponding musical genres." FireWolf Flux (talk) 19:44, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing words between vernacular and the hip hop dance
Talk:Peter Henley

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 10:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Any free image available of peter? Rafmarham (talk) 20:36, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture?
Talk:Peter Holmes à Court

message: Could someone who knows please add the pronunciation of this person's name?  In particular, is the final "t" pronounced? --macrakis (talk) 03:29, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: Please quote the relevant sections from the sources in the case of refs 3, 4, 5, 7 (of this version of the article). Stifle (talk) 13:53, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thhank yoou; I will look into this soon. Stifle (talk) 20:36, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request quotations 

message: Please note that this page attracts vandals and pamphleteers. Verified content is often removed and replaced with fanciful and unverifiable nonsense. 
Edasent (talk) 13:22, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: However, the sections "Firepower Fiasco" and "Crisis of credibility" violate WP:BLP and WP:UNDUE, and should not be restored. Stifle (talk) 15:27, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The sections you refer to are fully referenced from verifiable material. Your deletion of this material is VANDALISM. Edasent (talk) 15:33, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No it's not. Being referenced is necessary but not sufficient for content to be on this site. It must also meet all the other policies. Explain how it meets WP:UNDUE. Stifle (talk) 20:48, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandal Watch 

message: Some editors have been erroneously attaching 'dead link' to valid links referenced on this page. The links were found to be still valid and 'alive'. Greg Barry (talk) 14:34, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valid Links 

message: I removed material from two sections because I felt it was not sufficiently neutral in expression (per WP:NPOV). I am responding here to a message at my talk. To explain the words "blogs talks about spin, we don't" in my edit summary, I am not saying that a blog was used as a reference: my point is that it is not really satisfactory to refer to "spin" in a BLP (whereas other outlets, such as blogs, use such terms frequently because they are expressing their opinion). Articles should not say "some sources", particularly in a BLP: just stick to the facts (source X said Y). It certainly appears that some interesting things have happened in the subject's life, but we need to take care in how they are reported here. I will wait to see if any other reactions occur to recent edits before looking further. Johnuniq (talk) 06:37, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral language 

message: Stifle added these to the article in September 2010 after making a claim to 'not participating in this article any further' in July 2010 (see above). User has also made wholesale deletions and attempted obstruction of relevant and referenced material from this article (see section 'Request Quotations' this page) without discussion. POV and Coaltrack notices are being removed from this article since no further activity in 4 months after Stifle actions. These notices detract from the factual reality of the entry which has been scrutinized by many editors over time and contains well referenced material and no POV or conjecture. Everton Dasent (talk) 21:46, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV and Coaltrack
Template talk:San Francisco

message: Thanks, Zzyzx11.  I was going to break those new additions loose into a government section once I finished looking for SF government stubs, but it looks like you beat me to it. :) [Addendum: I have also changed the links for "Mayors" and "Board of Supervisors" to the articles for the actual offices, rather than the previously linked lists of past and present holders of those offices.]  --Dynaflow 09:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Government section 

message: I left this question on the parks listing page as well -- I think Golden Gate View Park is probably an error -- perhaps for Golden Gate Heights Park.  I'm a 20-year resident of San Francisco, and I've never heard of a Golden Gate View Park.  The SF.gov website doesn't list one either. Should I just go ahead with a bold edit on the parks listing page AND here? Sfmammamia 22:56, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Went ahead and made the change, will also change the listing on  San Francisco parks --Sfmammamia 20:32, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in park listing?
Talk:Peter J. Biondi

message: Does anybody have an e-mail copy of, or a link to, the actual text of the alledged racially insensitive jokes that Biondi e-mailed in early 2007.
Here is a local newspaper editorial with general information regarding the incident:
http://www.c-n.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070503/OPINION01/705030324/1009
72.82.204.160 03:38, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Biondi Jokes
Talk:Peter Joseph Jugis

message: Do we have a better picture of the bishop? --Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 16:21, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: I placed the neutrality tag on this article, specifically regarding the views section. I think that there are ways that this section can be edited to be more, and sound more, neutral. But did not want to make edits without further input. --Dnclark (talk) 16:07, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality
Talk:Sense of place

message: Seem a bit speculative and/or like original research.  Anyone else get this sense?  Bradybd 09:28, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For me the main entry is not speculative as commented below 29 March 2007. Sense of place is complicated and contested and the original entry has tried to keep it simple but accurate. It could do with more references in the opening paragraph so I'll try to track some down. Today I added a new section on developing a sense of place including references.SocSci123 (talk) 12:19, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have heard architects and city planners use this term on a regular basis. There has got to be a better place to present it. Kortoso  (talk) 18:16, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: With Spirit of place. Thoughts? Kortoso  (talk) 18:20, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: While I just reverted some blanking, I have to agree that this is a bloody awful article. It's been tagged as such for eight years, too. Unless someone can come up with a rationale for salvaging some of this, I see no reason to keep it around for much longer. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 03:26, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There having been no counterarguments, it's time to clean house. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 20:58, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rampant original research
Talk:Peter Jenner

message: there seems to be some link spamming going on with regards to the copyright interviews, such that they end up in the body, the refs, AND the ELs. Surely it would be better to summarize his position with dates and a couple of pertinant refs and then just run a separate section in the ELs? Wwwhatsup (talk) 06:48, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright
Talk:Peter Kellner

message: May you please add this external link to the article: *Interview with Peter Kellner on British democracy on FiveBooks Thank you, Anon111 (talk) 13:56, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: as per Talk:Chibli_Mallat. --JokerXtreme (talk) 09:02, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Request
Talk:Peter Knight (physicist)

message: I'm new to Wiki editing so not sure if this should go here but for external links (and possibly reference) Prof. Knight's own bio page is here http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/people/p.knight
Tried to update the page by adding missing institutions, but I'm not very good at this. Could someone please have a go? I haven't removed any of the previous version.
Sinistral 13:42, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Peter Kunter

message: Amassing nine... You might amass 900, but 9?--Ralfdetlef (talk) 02:13, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I changed the wording. Don't be afraid to be bold next time. :-) Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 14:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amassing
Talk:Peter Leven

message: Wikipedia is not a fan site or a news site. We report particularly notable events, but it is not likely that these include an individual football game. The current material re games at Oxford Utd will be deleted unless an editor can cite at least the local press saying that it really was the greatest ever goal scored at the stadium. The BBC doesn't say so. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:44, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game-by-game reports