Talk:Kipunji

message: If you look at the Science article of 20 May 2005, you will note that the proper designation for this new species, in complete accord with the Rules of the International Union for Zoological Nomenclature, is:  Lophocebus kipunji Ehardt et al. 2005.  This is differentfrom the authorship of the article (Jones et al. 2005) because the authorities for the name are not equivalent to the authorship of the article, either in order of authorship (which reflects expertise in the naming; hence Ehardt is the first listed authority), or in the number of authorities for the name (not all authors of the publication had the expertise to contribute to the taxonomic classification and naming of the new species).  - some anon
:So be bold and fix it. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:15, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The ITIS Report lists the authority as "Jones et al., 2005". Kaldari 19:52, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's true. The article gives "Lophocebus kipunji Jones and some others, new species", even though Ehardt et al. are the authors of the article. Ucucha (talk) 12:34, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: authority

message: It has been assigned to a new genus - Rungwecebus kipunji - the first new primate genus for 83 years, according to  -- ALoan (Talk) 18:44, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sweet! I'll edit the article and links to it shortly. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:51, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that it's only the first new primate genus for one year (Hoolock was the last). However, that was only a new name, the latest truly new genus was the 1996 Pseudopotto.
According to , it is now called kipunji, not highland mangabey, so the article title should change accordingly. zafiroblue05 | Talk 00:42, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

text: The genus Hoolock has been described in 2005, but the species was described in 1834. Callibella was described in 2003 and discovered in I think 1999, but its validity is doubtful, since it's sometimes considered part of Callicebus. By the way, Allenopithecus nigroviridis itself was described in 1907, though the genus is from 1923. Callimico was discovered in 1904 and described in 1912. Ucucha (talk) 18:18, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Genus

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Kipunji. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051019001837/http://www.wcs.org/international/Africa/Tanzania/highlandmangabey to http://www.wcs.org/international/Africa/Tanzania/highlandmangabey
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051026235216/http://www.wcs.org/media/file/Highlandmangabeycall.wav to http://www.wcs.org/media/file/Highlandmangabeycall.wav
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051026235643/http://www.wcs.org/media/file/Highlandmangabeyvideo.mpg to http://www.wcs.org/media/file/Highlandmangabeyvideo.mpg
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:29, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified