lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:BAC Mustard

message: Could someone please verify the content of the third paragraph, and, if verifiable, edit it so that it is easier to understand? I would do this myself, but I do not have the time at present. Thanks. Vsst 19:10, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would happily bet a grand that the third paragraph is a complete mickey-take by some would-be comedian... McTodd 15:40, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, deleted it. Looks like vandalism. Missed the bit about the cardinals, or I would have done this much earlier. Vsst 01:53, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

text: sorry about this, but i found the content of the third para. on this site:
www.newscientist.com/MUSTARDbishop, it does appear to have moved though, i am not quite sure to where. i was a bit surprised about the cardinals too, but it appears to be true. sorry about the confusion. 21st july 2007
Actually , I think it's True...
McTodd 15:40, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Paragraph 

message: Should we move this article to "Multi-Unit Space Transport And Recovery Device" rather than continuing to use the abriviation "MUSTARD" as the title?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Vsst (talk • contribs) 19:41, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 

message: Under 'History' the article says:
Once this collaborative work was over, three American prototype similar-looking aircraft apppeared at Edwards Air Base. The Space Shuttle would later have a comparative design, and function.
''
This is a clear reference to the HL-10, M2-F2/3 and X-24 lifting bodies. Is there any evidence at all that these were copied from MUSTARD as opposed to being the fruits of extensive research taking place in both the US and the UK at the time into lifting body aircraft?
The connection with the Space Shuttle is also tenuous, although MUSTARD does resemble some of the 1960s design concepts for what evolved into it.
Unless there is a sourced reference, I suggest deleting this, and possibly replacing with a mention of other lifting body research vehicles, and of parallel-booster design concepts for the Space Shuttle
Sjbradshaw (talk) 12:16, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Implication that design was copied? 

message: Intro says "The final spaceplane was to be capable of attaining such an altitude that it would be able to achieve a sub-orbital trajectory before also performing a controlled return." - a strange way to say it, since it was at orbital velocity to release its payload into orbit ? What was the highest altitude orbit it could circularise, and then reenter from ? - Rod57 (talk) 20:55, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final spacecraft only sub-orbital ?
Talk:Berkeley High School (Moncks Corner, South Carolina)

message: Notable alumni
Hardrick Porchia  1986  Soldier Us Army, Albany St GA Linebacker at age 40
Mike Dingle 1987 Running Back Cincinnati Bengals 1991-1992
Ryan Stewart DB Detroit Lions co member of 2 Live Stews
Doug Stewart 1988 co member of 2 Live Stews
Clarence Williams RB deseased San Diego Chargers, Washington Redskins  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hardrickporchia (talk • contribs) 22:06, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Ancile

message: So...what happened to it? When's its last mention?
129.237.90.25 (talk) 02:36, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

message: The phrasing of this article's first sentence is that the Ancile is "said to have fallen from heaven, upon Numa Pompilius." Is that really what the Roman myths of it say? If not, we need to change this phrasing; I find it hard to imagine that the ancient Romans would thank us for claiming that Mars hit their second king in the head with a pelta.
And, following the IP 129.237.90.25's question, does anyone know what was said to have happened to (all twelve of) it? ExOttoyuhr (talk) 22:36, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numa Pompilius as played by Bugs Bunny?
Talk:Angelici

message: The article apparently refers to this Catholic order. Even though the order claims Byzantine heritage, it seems to be only an unsubstantiated "foundation myth", and even they explicitly state in the history section of their site: "the first surviving Statutes of the Order were published in Venice (where the Grand Masters resided) in 1573". As to why and how a Byzantine emperor would create a western-style order, i.e. along lines entirely alien to the political and religious practice of Orthodox Byzantium, it is left unexplained, nor are any sources provided to prove its existence prior to the 16th century (neither did I find any after googling). In fact, it would appear that this order is an Italian creation with no real links to Byzantium whatsoever. Whoever is knowledgeable enough on the subject, please expand the article and clarify the situation. Regards, Cplakidas 22:03, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy
Talk:Winnipeg Sun

message: I wonder whether someone could set up a more recent front page for the Infobox, as the current one is very dated from 2010 and doesn't reflect the current logo. Jimj wpg (talk) 06:12, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: New Front Page?
Talk:Anthesphoria

message: What time of year were the Anthesphoria celebrated? do we have more precise dates? --Svartalf (talk) 15:06, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ^When was this celebrated? 

message: Upon noticing that this article was copied and pasted from another, I updated it with non-plagiarized content and provided references for my writing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annarafferty (talk • contribs) 19:58, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Update
Talk:Antimonial cup

message: Reference 2, " Captain James Cook's Antimony Cup" by R.I. McCallum, is cited as the source for the following. 
*'The meaning of the word "antimony" seems to have come from Basil Valentine and the name "Antimoine" meaning "against monks". 
:The Technologist, Volume 1, p. 388  in a curious anecdote which I copy verbatim from Poiret's 'History of Drugs :'—" It acquired the name of antimony from the aforesaid Valentine... 
:This, therefore, was the reason of this mineral being called antimony (anti-monk), as destructive of the monks.
*'The cups were common in monasteries.'It is said that these cups were common in monasteries p. 127 - 80% down PDF file by SIR ST. CLAIR THOMSON, M.D.--Doug Coldwell talk 12:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Provided different inline references by  SIR ST. CLAIR THOMSON, M.D. in PDF file.--Doug Coldwell talk 12:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: In the interest of Wikipedia's NPOV policy, I have changed the word "gluttony," which has inherent moralistic/condemning overtones, to the more neutral "overeating." I hope this is a constructive edit, as I am still somewhat new at this. If there's a compelling reason to change it back, then by all means do so. 
70.243.252.220 (talk) 02:59, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think your edit was just fine. Do please register and get yourself a user name. Happy editing. Gaius Cornelius (talk) 08:50, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor Wording Edit 

message: Any source I can find seems to indicate the 1566 prohibition was specific to France, and passed by the Parliament of Paris / Parisian Parliament.  Although the article doesn't say otherwise, it leaves a vague impression of being the UK Parliament, since this is the most common parliament refered to in English without apecification.  The only references I can find to early UK rules are about smelting antimony in town leading to lead poisoning. Drkslvr (talk) 04:18, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  1566 Prohibition of Antimony
Talk:Arcanum duplicatum

message: If this is not a hoax page, I think it should be merged into potassium sulfate... according to the text, it's just another name for the same substance. Add the remaining 2 sentences to potassium sulfate and move on.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Riventree (talk • contribs) 10:42, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a good idea.—Ketil Trout (<><!) 03:19, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.—Ketil Trout (<><!) 03:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Propose merge
Talk:Real structure

message: This article needs an introduction. It is not clear what the appropriate context is, and what this article is trying to say. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs introduction

message: The phrasing here is confusing : «The second factor V^- is usually denoted by iV_{\mathbb{R}}.
In fact, as subsets of V, we have the equality V^-=iV_{\mathbb{R}}.
The phrasing "is usually denoted by" lead me to think that this is a kind of abuse of notation.
Laurent.Claessens (talk) 06:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Precision : what is iV_R
Talk:Argonauts of Saint Nicholas

message: What does "they received the order of Saint Basil, Archbishop of Naples" mean? They received the "Order of Saint Basil" and the Basil referred to was Abp of Naples? Should it say they received the "Order of Saint Basil" from the Abp of Naples? What is the "order of Saint Basil"? An order of merti? Or chivalry? A monastic rule? Srnec (talk) 19:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion
Talk:Arsis and thesis

message: The first sentence of this stub (the one dealing with the musical meaning of arsis and thesis) seems pretty convoluted and confusing to me. Can it be rewritten to make clearer what this term means in a musical context, perhaps with some (a) musical examples and (b) references to scholarly writing?
128.36.205.202 (talk) 18:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Rhinoceros (band)

message: If you type "Rhinoceros" into the "Search Wikipedia" box and look down the list, you will see an entry for "Rhinoceros (band)" which says "Canadian rock band".  If you click on that, you are taken to a page whose first sentence begins "Rhinoceros was an American rock band established in 1967".  There doesn't seem to be anything in the article indicating any Canadian origin or identity.  (At the end of the article, a section states that some of the members of Rhinoceros, after it broke up, formed a group called "Blackstone", which recorded one album for a Canadian label and then disbanded.)
It sure seems to me that the link to the article should say "American rock band", not "Canadian rock band"—simply on the basis of the article itself.  I might have changed it, if I knew how, writing a rather different posting here in that case.  I'm really out of my area of knowledge, though, so probably someone better qualified should take care of this, one way or another.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.191.245.184 (talk) 23:21, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Slight contradiction
Talk:Pre-ferment

message: A photo exists on French Wikipedia here  which needs verification of its license before transfer to Commons. It then could be used for this article. Can anyone help?  Geoff (talk) 00:15, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Photo of Pre-Ferment on French Wikipedia 

message: There are many errors in this article - historical and practical.  Maybe someday, when I have more time, I will revisit the Pre-ferment page and make some corrections.  For example: biga and poolish ARE NOT limited to commercial yeast, nor have they traditionally been used as described in the article; they have been used for hundreds of years with sourdough.  
I would note also that using a metal spoon, not made out of S.S., as shown in the photograph accompanying the article is a big no-no.  Metal in contact with a sourdough starter, which is acidic, will cause the starter to have an off taste and the metal will, given enough time, probably kill the start too.
King Arthur has a much better article on their website <http://www.kingarthurflour.com/professional/preferments.html> 
ColdBay (talk) 20:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Whether metal affects the dough depends upon what kind of metal you're using and how long you leave it in there.  Even King Arthur Flour endorses the use of stainless steel for sourdough starters.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:38, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is not historically and factually accurate - many problems.
Talk:Kneading

message: I'm no expert, but I do know that I'm currently eating a bread, that has not been kneaded, and it's holding fine pockets of gas from the yeast. This article seems to be slightly imprecise on this matter.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.160.23.211 (talk) 05:17, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kneading is not necesarry, as suggested
Talk:Elaine Grey

message: I don't understand the Grey Genome argument. Doesn't the capabillity of the Phoneix arise from the genes created from her mom's side -and- her dad's side? Mix 'em together and you got the capabillity to eat suns... Lots42 12:08, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now there is a section -called- Grey Genome that should be merged into the fictional character biography. I'd do it myself but the article depresses me and yes, that is a bit silly. Lots42 (talk) 01:34, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grey Genome
Talk:Herb Steinohrt

message: Jeff, why redlink Pittsworth, Queensland. Are you going to write an article about it ?. Bet it's a fun old town.-Sticks66 14:34, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just an 's' missing. Correct link now. •Florrie•leave a note• 03:45, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'll eat my words. It is indeed a fun old town.-Sticks66 (talk) 06:57, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redlink Pittsworth 
Talk:Quick bread

message: There is another method, which this article does not mention. I don't know the proper name for it, and have never seen it explained as a "method" but I've seen it in old recipes so it isn't something new. It basically involves mixing melted shortening into cold water (or milk, etc). The shortening hardens up with contact with the water, but not as a single lump. I turns into a sort of slurry distributed throughout the water...rather like slush. The result when you mix it into the dry ingredients is somewhat like having cut butter or shortening into the dough with a fork or pastry cutter, but much easier.--Ericjs (talk) 15:34, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shortening slush method 

message: The info box claims that quick breads originated in the US. Can anyone find a reference for that? Otherwise I would suggest that place of origin is removed. Quick breads have existed longer that the United States. Yes, modern baking powder was developed in the US in the middle of the 19th century, but potash/pearlash ) has been used since 1000 BC and  hartshorn salt ((NH4)2CO3) at least since the 16th century as forerunners to baking powder when making quick bread. Hartshorn salt is used still today in some Swedish baking. Thomas Blomberg (talk) 19:17, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: And not only in Sweden! In Norwegian and Danish baking (as well as many other places) too, the very similar Hjortetakksalt is used in many traditional bakings. I have put [citation needed] in the text where US invention is mentioned. I agree that it should be removed from the fact-box until it can be confirmed(or denied)  ~🐈🐈~♪~何? 21:54, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Place of origin: United States" Really?? 

message: Basically the subject. I don't know really what it originally went to but a replacement needs to be found. --Nerd1a4i (talk) 01:32, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  First citation's link is dead
Talk:Media in Winnipeg

message: A third daily newspaper, the Metro, is available free on the streets. It joins editions of this paper published in other Canadian cities.
I will update the article if no one else gets to it, and if someone puts a reminder in my inbox. Otherwise, it is low priority and requires research on my part.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ricgal (talk • contribs) 05:17, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  update needed re daily newspapers
Talk:Actions in Inner Mongolia (1933–1936)

message: I moved "Actions in Inner Mongolia(1933-36)" to "Actions in Inner Mongolia (1933-36)" to correct the spacing before the parentheses. Flyguy649talkcontribs 03:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Talk:Evolutionary ecology

message: Needs to connect with ecological genetics, polymorphism (biology) and other technical topics. Needs to get a grip on what aspects of evolutionary theory are really central to ecology. Needs to weave in faunas, biomes and other overview concepts. Is niche not worth a thought? An appreciation of what many crossover researchers such as E.B. Ford and W.D. Hamilton contributed is missing.   Macdonald-ross (talk) 20:48, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  another dimension needed 

message: could some biologists chip in at the talk page regarding the current status of this theory?·Maunus·ƛ· 12:53, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[r/K selection theory]]

message: Overall I think that a lot of good things are present within your article. There are a few areas that could be added/edited. When talking about each evolutionary model, I would start each paragraph with the specific method and bold or underline it (I think you can link it to the article with the method for more detail). The area that mentions all the notable people is very good. I think there are many more areas of evolutionary ecology that could be expanded on such as genetics, studies etc. I also think specific examples would be beneficial to the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calebszy (talk • contribs) 15:46, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Ecology Course Peer Review

message: It's a bit weird to have a miscellaneous list of people who are evolutionary ecologists. I don't think this follows what I perceive to be a standard Wikipedia format for a topical article. The omission of many persons associated with this broad field is sure to be a problem. For example, why is Alfred Russell Wallace not listed? Arguably, he is more deserving of inclusion that Darwin, and fairly likely anyone else listed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:300A:519:8F00:B17D:B329:DB2A:BC51 (talk) 23:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Odd Structure: Listing of People
Talk:Calotte

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skull#/media/File:Sobo_1909_38.png accessed 2019-12-30
, source included 27 August 2017‎, & criteria: "calotte hominid scullcap", accessed 2019-12-30 
Diametakomisi (talk) 18:37, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  edit of 18:36, 30 December 2019‎
Talk:Niamh (mythology)

message: Of course now I'm wondering if this should just be Niamh, with a link at the top to the disambig. Ugh, I shouldn't work on these things when I'm tired. - Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 03:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This article seems to be more about Oisín than Niamh. Ceaseless (talk) 00:02, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Oisín

message: I am removing the claim that Niamh's horse is Enbarr. There is no WP:RS to back this. 
This is not stated in Michael Comyn's poem, which seems to be the sole source of this legend.
If it is being called Enbarr in some retelling or pulp novel, please identify the work and place it in an /*Adapation*/ or /*In Popular culture*/ section as appropriate. --Kiyoweap (talk) 07:49, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Embarr 

message: — Assignment last updated by Rockethound (talk) 22:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: HUM 202 - Introduction to Mythology
Talk:Paleoecology

message: The article references only four studies, which is not adequate for an article describing a complete field. Entire aspects of paleoecology are missing: the article mentions Quaternary paleoecological research, but neglects to mention how that research is conducted (lake sediments never make an appearance). Furthermore, the goal of paleoecology is described as primarily biological ("to understand the current state of biodiversity"). While paleoecology undoubtably focuses on reconstructing past biogeographies, it is also incredibly valuable for reconstructing past climates and environmental change. To improve the article, more references should be added, and sections should be written that describe methods of paleoecology besides those that depend on pre-quaternary fossils (as it stands, the article makes it seem as though paleoecology is a by-product of paleontology, and not a separate field). 
Katherine hayes (talk) 00:37, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nappy headed hos

message: This phrase was the at the center of a massive media circus in the United States, and the redirect is appropriate. --NEMT 03:32, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know that the redirect is appropriate ... but appropriate or not, it is not speedyable.  It should be taken to WP:RFD if desired. --BigDT 03:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion
Talk:Caphar

message: Hmm...what is this supposed to be? I'm sure there is another name for it. If it was created by the Christians it should be a crusader tax, but which one? Capitatio? Adam Bishop (talk) 03:26, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: palletooru is a place of tradition.........
youcan have photos and activities of palletooru in fb under www.facebook.com/palletooru  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manikanta.ramadugula (talk • contribs) 10:38, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  palletooru fb
Talk:Chain shot

message: "Chain shot was used by the defenders of Magdeburg in May 1631 as an anti-personnel load, which according to counselor Otto von Guericke was one reason for the extreme violence of the victorious attackers, another being that the inhabitants were Protestants, the attacking soldiers Catholics." Apart from being vaguely phrased, this could be interpreted as an either anti-Catholic or Protestant remark. I suggest a more concise, clear rewrite. 209.91.141.58 (talk) 19:38, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

message: "Chain shot is reported to have been invented around 1665.[2]
Chain shot was used by the defenders of Magdeburg in May 1631 as an anti-personnel load..."
Why are there two different dates? If it was used in 1631 that would mean it was made before then, so why is the first date still listed? Onehotdog93 (talk) 08:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date

message: "They could also be picked up and used as mêlée weapons on deck."
I removed the above line - unreferenced, weasel word (anything "could" be used), and makes no sense. Mefanch (talk) 19:40, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Melee weapon

message: The chained cannonballs were featured prominently in the TV series Borgias in the events which took place long before 1600s - the earliest mentioned in this article?--184.161.155.26 (talk) 00:25, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Borgias 
Talk:Chaldron

message: Should there be a disamiguation page? "Chaldron" is an important concept in Chronic City.
YLlama (talk) 01:42, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A chaldron seems to be nothing else than pointed out in this article: an obsolete measure. It looks to me like Lethem made the word (and subject) up. I mean, it is a work of fiction in the end. So NYC is not only without a tiger, it seems like there are no chaldrons on this planet. Reminds me of Philip K. Dick's 2000 year old clay and pottery jars. To start a disambiguation page because of a different meaning in 1 work of fiction? Well, possible, but maybe better not (yet). Cheers, --Gereon K. (talk) 21:00, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronic City.
Talk:Bishop Fenwick High School (Peabody, Massachusetts)

message: I'm an alumni (class of 1981) of BFHS, and noticed that this entry has not really been filled out. So I'll take it on. Others, especially current students, please add more detail! And current student, please, no vandalism. Let's make this a positive reflection of Fenwick... both in terms of page content and behavior! I'll keep it on my watchlist to check progress... ΨνPsinu 15:59, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  At long last, more detailed info coming 