lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:International human rights instruments

message: I have nominated the 99 Percent Declaration by the Occupy movement. Dualus (talk) 17:43, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: God, you're exporting the POV-push campaign all over the place.  Note that the sources seem to reject the idea that this document be associated with the "Occupy" movements. Centrify (f / k / a FCAYS)  (talk)  (contribs) 17:55, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  It certainly meets the definitions. Do you think  (audio) could be related? Dualus (talk) 20:23, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Take a step back from your soapbox for just a moment and notice that every single other "Declaration" on that list issued from a major international organization such as the UN.  The authors of the "99% Declaration" can't even get a bunch of hippies to vote on their "Declaration".  Removed again. Centrify (f / k / a FCAYS)  (talk)  (contribs) 20:52, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the removal from factchecker, their is no common concensus among the occupy movement. Therefore human rights is not neccessarily a priority/platform for the group and should therefore not be included.Millertime246 (talk) 21:05, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As do I. Even if sources did say that the Occupy Movement is united around this, (which they don't) there is still no justification for the demands of a group of protesters somehow being put in this document. The idea is beyond absurd. Trusilver 21:45, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

text: Hell, no.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:14, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination 

message: Dear Writers,
Classification point, Which conventions belong to UN general assembly and which conventions belong to international human rights law . 
While in fact and at the end they are all laws belonging to human rights but as soon as this classification mentioned I would like to know .
Thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohamed Atef Ezz (talk • contribs) 20:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which is which 

message: Critically duscuss three human rights instruments  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A03:2880:32FF:10:0:0:FACE:B00C (talk) 16:15, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life orintation
Talk:Allertonshire School

message: Allertonshire has a good amount of students reaching about 700 and also has a fund raising event e.g non - uniform day to raise money for mainly 'Imagine' and recently the Haiti appeal. It also gives good encouragement for the disabled students.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.52.62 (talk) 16:45, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Toward the Unknown

message: The first tagline is patently false (e.g. Destination Moon (film)), while the second is still in unmemorable violation of WP:TAGLINE. The two sentences could be retained without the taglines if the cited references support them. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:05, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The tagline actually refers to the USAF efforts of flying X-planes to the edge of space. Not sure why this is such a hullabaloo issue (see: If the tagline is not very famous but still considered relevant to a film's marketing, it can belong in the appropriate section of the article body.), but I can see removing the second instance. FWiW, Note the clever but duplicitous use of terminology: "The screen's first story of man-piloted rocket ships as a case can be made that other spaceships were actually remotely controlled, and were not "piloted". Bzuk (talk) 02:48, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know why that sentence is even in WP:TAGLINE; every tagline is part of the marketing. Presumably it is intended to mean significantly relevant. Anyway, I don't want to open the floodgates to all the slobbering tagline devotees out there (and there are plenty). Besides, there's no sign of remote control in Destination Moon or Abbott and Costello Go to Mars for that matter (and may a balloon pop if I'm not telling the truth). Clarityfiend (talk) 03:47, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It was pretty clear that the film was trying to tie into the USAF X-planes program with their marketing.  Take a look at the new edits. FWiW, NACA/NASA test pilots made it eminently clear to any within earshot, that they were "real" pilots and the others were "spam in a can." (Quote: Chuck Yeager) Bzuk (talk) 03:50, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's back. The horror ... the horror. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:20, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag, you're it.
Talk:Paul Ziff

message: This entry plagiarizes heavily from the "Remembering Paul Ziff" essay on the UNC Chapel Hill web site.
:As I put it in my review in Metaphilosophy,: is this part of it? Andres (talk) 11:05, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is good though it includes too many sentences that are overly positive and value-judging. Example "Jonathan Cohen said, back in the early 60s, the last chapter "is one of the best discussions of the word 'good' that has ever been published". It still is, forty years later.". Deleet (talk) 09:51, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Mh. No description of his actual ideas, views or arguments, just talk about the external. Andres (talk) 11:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overly positive
Talk:Andy Turner (hurdler)

message: http://www.erki.nl/pics/main.php?g2_itemId=40330 
OTRS - 2008082610013775 Dnikitin (talk) 19:38, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  photo from Barcelone 2010 
Talk:Andy Walker (footballer, born 1965)

message: Should be more on his time at Ayr, he was a cult figure there. Partnership with Glynn Hurst, penalty v Kilmarnock, etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.57.23 (talk) 14:22, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Polson, Montana

message: I deleted some childish nonsense about a famous resident who "won the Heisman Trophy in 2011" and abused someone in the back of a grocery store. --Leshii 17:50, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous Residents 
Talk:Catholic Church in Portugal

message: What cities or areas of Portugal still have the old ways of the Church?  The old ways from before the 1958?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.141.163.185 (talk) 04:17, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You might want to consult the article Extraordinary form of the Roman Rite. Chicbyaccident (talk) 14:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: The Catholic Church in Portugal

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: History of the Catholic Church in Portugal →  – Since there is no actual overview of the church in Portugal, which could be at hand before separating pages into history. Furthermore, in consistency with other equivalent articles, including Catholic Church, Catholic Church in England and Wales, Catholic Church in the United States, etc. Chicbyaccident (talk) 14:39, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
For the record, you might also be interested in the current move discussion at Talk:Roman Catholicism in Armenia. Chicbyaccident (Please notify with  (Talk) 12:12, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

text: Case closed. Chicbyaccident (Please notify with  (Talk) 17:07, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2 October 2016 
Talk:Angela Kepler

message: I removed the ref for biographical info (from the 1st paragraph):
cite web|url=http://www.pbif.org/images/akkbio.html|title=biography: Dr Angela K Kepler|publisher=Pacific Biodiversity Information Forum
However, it's my understanding that much of PBIF's information has been moved to other places (since pbif.org was shut down).  If someone knows the new location of the info that was formerly at that URL, you might want to re-add this ref w/ the new location.
philiptdotcom (talk) 03:25, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  PBIF biography info: gone?  or moved?
Talk:Altrincham Grammar School for Boys

message: Please add the following under 'Notable alumni';
• Glyn Hughes, poet, novelist and artist, born 25 May 1935; died 24 May 2011
From the Guardian obituary.
Ccharlyb (talk) 14:03, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that, I've made the change. Nev1 (talk) 14:11, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Ccharlyb, 22 June 2011 
Talk:Alun School

message: I added in a few headmasters from memory but there needs to be more detail
In addition the school web site itself is not correct on the foundation date.  The Alun School is the coming together of the Alun Grammar School AND the secondary modern, so that history needs to be there, plus the list of headmasters.  --Snowded TALK 07:09, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no objection to the above although I think you should also show the history of the Secondary Modern, The two schools were merged and its history (and headmasters) are as much a part of the history of the current school as the old Grammar.   I am sure that if you check with some of the original teachers (Betty Williams if she is still around) then you gather that material as well.  I would also ask you not to remove the note against German to the effect that he was sacked, its notable and cited.  --Snowded (talk) 21:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Have no objections to information being added but it needs to be referenced from a published source. And although it may be incorrect, point 1 above has been referenced and if it is untrue it should still be put in as "source 1 stated xxxx but source 2 on the contrary proves/confirms/states that xxxx is the case." The school itself can't really be used alone as a reliable source as it is not independent and unbiased, hence why ESTYN reports and information referencing the county council and various historians and news articles are used. Thaf (talk) 08:52, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Haven Institute (Gabriola Island, Canada)

message: To: DGG (talk)
I have followed your suggestions for the Haven Institute article.   When you have time, please look to see if this article can be improved more.  Please note the trailer on the Haven article regarding "Category:Items to be merged" and "Category:Articles to be merged{{#if:"... I think it is a partially removed tag ... but I have left it, not knowing if it should be there or not.  Should this be there?  Thanks.  William Meyer (talk) 19:18, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Improving [[Haven Institute]]
Talk:Star Wars Episode I (pinball)

message: Was well have created this page, but I've found a correction: the actual name of this machine is actually "Star Wars Episode I". The "The Phantom Menace" subtitle is not present, and thus I've moved the page. David Pro 18:19, 02 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name correction 
Talk:Angelina Gualdoni

message: Checked the first two references.  They did not mention the subject. Better citations would improve notability. Pknkly (talk) 03:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Abortion/Assessment

message: Portuguese abortion referendum, 2007 is still rated stub-class; looking at the guidelines I would say its now somewhere between B and GA. Could someone reassess pls? AndrewRT(Talk) 21:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I upped the class from stub to start. The article, in its current form, does not treat the subject in a lot of detail, but it does feature "useful graphic" and "multiple subheadings." -Severa  (!!!) 23:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Angie Chiu

message: :File:赵雅芝.png
I found the nearby drawing in commons. Because I do not know the policy about amateur-drawings in enwp I leave it here instead in the article. --DaB. (talk) 19:23, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi DaB.. It's a copyvio. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Eddie Feigner

message: The picture attached to this article does not appear to be Eddie Feigner. It looks like Jack Knight, long-time player on the KIng and His Court.198.146.56.62 21:25, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on the pics on the K&HC website, that can't be Feigner. I think the mistake was made by the folks at LLU, but I'm not sure where they got the photo. --Habap 19:56, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: The article had to be deleted because it was mostly text copied from the Washington Post and other places. I have restored the newer introduction and saved the references so that someone can improve the article in the future. This is the major problem with text copied from elsewhere used on Wikipedia, because, generally, all revisions made after the text was copied have to be deleted. —Centrx→talk • 21:21, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm disappointed, because there is now no record of the changes. Some of that stuff was researched and written rather than copied. It's a shame none of it is in the history any more because of the deletion. --Habap 17:40, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you hurry, you can get it at google cached. Sammyj 18:57, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied text 
Talk:List of talk show hosts

message: This list of talk show hosts doesn't include Rush Limbaugh.  Is there another list for radio talk show hosts?
Dittos!  This site must be badly influenced by liberals to leave out the most popular radio talk show host in history.  
More proof you can't trust Wikipedia for accurate reliable information. 75.139.214.136 (talk) 18:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: comments

message: This list will never be complete or it will be a enormeous sized useless list. Whats the point of it? 91.77.233.120 (talk) 03:01, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  useless list 

message: Seems there are plenty of Brits working the US but that doesn't seem the case for Americans getting work in the UK. Are there any not listed? I know that the UK can watch western media. I just wonder about UK nationalist attitudes in its media.  203.131.210.82 (talk) 10:47, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any American's working on British Talk shows in U.K. 

message: Someone please add Bruce Williams and a link to his Wikipedia page. He was ranked #6 most influential hosts by Talkers magazine, yet he didn't even make a list that includes Daniel Tosh?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.238.249.194 (talk) 12:40, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bruce Williams 

message: The influential David Susskind is missing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.61.10.174 (talk) 13:15, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[David Susskind]]
Talk:As the crow flies

message: Definitely needs more - even to clarify the definition already supplied. Some literary examples would also serve to explain the idiom (e.g. Martin's Song of Ice and Fire, in which the phrase is used numerous times)
We need to know the history of this term, where is it from, when did they start using it, why a crow, cant other birds fly straight?--HalaTruth(ሐላቃህ) 21:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History of the term

message: no page "as the hippie walks" - delete?
I've never heard the phrase, "as the hippie walks" and apparently no one else has.  I recommend a deletion.  12.43.88.120 16:51, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: see also

message: I think the Allen dictionary source used here is overcomplicating the phrase, and it's causing confusion in the article. It's always been my understanding that when someone says "such-and-such is 10 miles away, as the crow flies" it means exactly what it says... if you could fly straight there, like a crow, and avoid the curves and obstacles of ground paths. Allen touches on this but then seems to want to link it to "crows nest" and the concept of straightness. I'm certain that's a redherring, as evidenced by his own admission that it has a landlocked origin. It's a subtle difference, but "as the crow flies" does not just mean "in a straight line" it more specifically means to avoid ground obstacles, making it a silly phrase to use on a boat at open water. As such, I also think the comparison to "beeline" is a bit misleading. A person can make a beeline across a room, but you wouldn't say "as the crow flies" unless you are talking about greater distances with obstacles to be avoided (flown over). 71.223.89.105 (talk) 17:59, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin confusion
Talk:Anita B. Brody

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Anita Blumstein Brody was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 16:26, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Lee Eyerly

message: What does the middle initial U. stand for?  RJFJR (talk) 22:27, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ulrich. As stated on page 177 of A pictorial history of the American carnival, Volume 1 by Joe Mckennon.  — CactusWriter (talk) 19:04, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The following text is unsourced and has been removed per our guidelines at WP:VERIFIABLE:
In 1954, Walt Disney Imagineering contacted Eyerly Aircraft and negotiated with them to build Disneyland's Dumbo ride on a modified Octopus frame. Plans were drawn and models built, but Walt ultimately gave the job to the fledgling Arrow Development company.
One story, told by Dave Bradley of amusement ride company Bradley and Kaye, claims that Lee Eyerly's son, Jack, flew himself to Burbank one day in August 1954 to offer Disney a new ride with three interlocking turntables.  Although his designers were fascinated by the working model, Walt was in a bad mood that day and dismissed the mechanism. Arrow eventually built that ride, too; Disney called it the Mad Tea Party.
I have searched for a reliable source for these statements but have been unable to find any -- only Wikipedia mirrors and references back to this article. I have removed the text from the article until it can be verified by a good reference.  — CactusWriter (talk) 21:34, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced rumor
Talk:Anita Ramasastry

message: I removed the reference to her commentary about the Seigenthaler incident. It's a rather perfunctory column that doesn't distinguish itself from the many other commentaries at the time, and as such doesn't properly illustrate her extensive work in other areas of technology law. So I conclude that the real reason for the mention falls afoul of the guideline against self-references. --Michael Snow (talk) 17:29, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wells Street Bridge (Chicago)

message: This page seems to be out-of-date. The references to the bridge replacement read as if they were written about the time the bridge was replaced. I could take a stab at updating the page, but I have little, if any, experience editing Wikipedia content, and know little about the specifics of this page. Still, I commute over the Wells Street Bridge on a daily basis, and can tell it needs updating.
Smontanaro (talk) 12:28, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: , yes much was added to the article during the reconstruction when sources were available to broaden the article. Wikipedia says Be Bold, take a try at updating the article, with reliable sources. You can see the format for references in the present references and citations.  --Prairieplant (talk) 08:24, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  update article, be bold
Talk:William Craig Rice

message: Dr Rice passed away recently. http://hauensteincenter.org/WilliamCraigRice/. Not sure what the best way to add this to a biographical page is, but if nobody else will, I'll figure it out
74.76.184.242 (talk) 20:24, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

message: Due to the death of this person, the BLP status of this article has changed. This does not mean that unsourced material that would contravene the Biography of Living Persons rules can be added to this article Capitalistroadster (talk) 00:19, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: BLP status change

message: This article has been classified as a start due to its level of details. Capitalistroadster (talk) 00:24, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Classification as a start
Talk:Amery Hill School

message: This article has now been assessed. The feedback given was: Contains some encyclopedic content about the school. Needs to be expanded to go into further detail with an infobox and more structure. Lack of references and NPOV issues also need to be resolved. Camaron1 | Chris 10:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: The article is listed in the backlog of articles to be checked for NPOV because of the tag. It is not really a disputed article, so I suggest you replace the tag with a to-do list on this page. It's not a bad school stub, actually. Itsmejudith 20:59, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has since been edited to be more balanced, so I have removed the tag. Camaron1 | Chris 14:33, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  To-do list? 
Talk:Anja Rubik

message: This and other Wikipedias in other languages have been relentlessly spammed by anonymous IPs based in Israel (where the domain is registered) for many months. It's gotten sufficiently bad as to warrant addition to the spam blacklist and I have removed a number of these links in anticipation of blacklisting:
*Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam#modelsobserver.com (permanent link)
*:meta:Talk:Spam blacklist#modelsobserver.com (permanent link)
Most, but not all, had been added by the site-owner.
If an established, high-volume editor sees value to the specific link I deleted from this article, please let me know and it can be evaluated for addition to the spam "whitelist"
--A. B. (talk •  contribs)  03:23, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: modelsobserver.com links

message: Sources disagree on whether she was born in 1983 or 1985. The best example of the confusion on this is , which mentions both dates.  indicates 1983 is the correct year, but it's obviously not a reliable source. Toccata quarta (talk) 10:15, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of birth
Talk:Ann Charters

message: Charters was a "close friend" of Kerouac? I thought that they only met once, documented in Kerouac: A Biography. Prescottbush (talk) 20:42, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 04:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Ann Hobson Pilot

message: Why is this alphabetized under "H" rather than "P"? Badagnani (talk) 06:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Alphabetization