lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Crested caracara

message: According to the German and English Wikipedia article on Falconidae, they are not considered Birds of Prey any more, as recent DNA studies showed that they are more closely related to parrots. The bird of prey like features resulted from convergent evolution. How confirmed is that? Perhaps the reference to bird of prey should be removed.
 2800:300:6241:5500:0:0:0:2 (talk) 17:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: This article appears out of date. Most authorities now recognize two species: Crested Caracara (Caracara cheriway) with three subspecies, pallidus, audubonii and cheriway; and Southern Caracara (Caracara plancus) (monotypic). Ptilinopus (talk) 11:42, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi,  - you are most welcome to update the article per WP:PAG, paying close attention to WP:RS.  Happy editing!  Atsme 💬 📧 11:56, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I’m not experienced in major editing, which in this case would involve a new article, changes to referrals, etc. It will need to done by those with the skills. My area is taxonomy. Thanks.  Ptilinopus (talk) 07:35, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Caracara (genus) and related discussion on WP:Birds indicates that the current article is what Ornithological groups use, eg one single species for the extant caracaras.--Kevmin § 16:26, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separation of species 

message: The species is mentioned in the film "Terror Birds" (2016) at about 8m. (Also referred to as "Mexican Eagle".) Drsruli (talk) 04:33, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  In media 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Schopfkarakara.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for March 20, 2024. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2024-03-20. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 18:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Orbirail

message: Could I suggest including a reference to Tokyo's Yamanote Line for a conceptual comparison? This also helps to explain the possible economic benefits of orbirail: Presently London's zone 2 is constrained economically by the dominance of radial transport into overcrowded zone 1. Improved lateral transport around zone 2 could help develop multiple new economic centres like those found around the Yamanote line and reduce the pressure on zone 1.87.194.80.255 (talk) 13:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds like a good idea, but isn't the Yamanote line more like the Circle line in London? I'm not sure exactly how far out it is. Eraserhead1 (talk) 16:48, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Both Yamanote and the Circle Line are around 30 kilometers long. The orbital rail route for London is much, much longer. --Duncan (talk) 21:57, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Yamanote Line
Talk:David Eaton (composer)

message: Talk:David Eaton
Dmichaele (talk) 16:15, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is WAAAAAY too long for someone of marginal notability. It needs to be seriously pruned of fluff and unimportant and unencyclopedic content. -Exucmember (talk) 20:59, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Puff piece

message: Certain references (the New York Daily News reviews, e.g.) do refer to the sponsorship of the Unification movement and its founder as this information was made available in the program booklets for these concerts and the reviewer made note of that. 96.224.32.227 (talk) 19:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I put the UC ties to NYCS in a footnote. 
I believe funding sources for artistic bodies are not ordinarily mentioned with mention of the orchestra, museum, or whatever (unless they are sponsors trying to get attention, like the Staples Center or something like that.) 
As such though the UC is an unusually interesting group, there should be consistency with convention.  The UC should neither be hidden nor excessively paraded.  
The NYCS is a small group of serious and conscientious artists trying to pursue careers as symphony musicians.  As a difficult career, they have to take work where they can get it.  Some might be grateful for Moon's patronage that gives them a place to play, some may resent it.  But the NYCS is not part of the UC, not an orchestra made up of or for UC members.  It's ties to the UC should be treated in ways similar to funding ties for the thousands of other art vehicles that rely on patronage to survive. Mybesteffort (talk) 16:51, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Funding for NYCS 

message: Someone knowledgeable should put in the year Moon bought/rescued the NYCS, and should put up the percentage-funding breakdown for the orchestra.  Mybesteffort (talk) 16:51, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Footnote 1 needs more information

message: Almost the entire introductory paragraph needs references.  The absence of verification is especially glaring in the opening section of this article.  Mybesteffort (talk) 16:54, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References missing ''especially'' for the intro paragraph 

message: I removed this:
" (which has received funding from several of Rev. Moon's organizations, primarily from the International Cultural Foundation.)"
from the biographical section, because it should already have been put in the footnotes when the organization is first mentioned.  Mybesteffort (talk) 17:12, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  parenthetic information about funding 

message: Removed this:
"(a professional ensemble founded in 1926)."
Put this in the original info and explanation about the NYCS when NYCS is first introduced in the article
Mybesteffort (talk) 17:29, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  more parenthetical info 

message: Someone deleted his headshot, apparently because of incorrect licensing or tagging. These should be uploaded again, with "free" licensing. --Uncle Ed (talk) 22:34, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos
Talk:Lombo Pocket Watch

message: This is obviously a "labour of love" piece, and I repect the creators for their hard work, but there is way too much unreferenced material here and a lot of pov issues. Tigerboy1966  14:34, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Trimming
Talk:Porcelain (disambiguation)

message: Emotional, melodic, dynamic, and powerful are words that come to mind when introduced to the band Porcelain. .. Originally formed in Wollongong (Australia) now bases in Los Angeles (USA), Porcelain has a unique lineup and an original sound. Their sound is based on the dynamic vocals of female front Lo Roberts, the powerful melodic guitars of Ben Richards, the emotional layers of violinist Asha Mevlana and the strength of rhythm section Ewen Penberthy-Groves (Bass) and Blake Paulson (Drums). 
Porcelain formed in Wollongong, just outside of Sydney Australia, by songwriting duo Lo and Ben. After fleshing out their outfit to a 5 piece lineup, Porcelain rose to the top of their local scene, winning a MusicOz Award and later gaining a spot on the M-One tour with the Goo Goo Dolls, Simple Plan, Nickelback and Lifehouse. An industry buzz attracted interest from Sony Records and Wizard Records and Porcelain elected to sign with Wizard, an independent label who had a more immediate focus on the U.S market. 
The band relocated to Los Angeles and began to build a name by sustaining residencies at multiple venues including the Viper Room. The band developed their live show and local fan-base which attracted interest from Universal Records, Maverick Records and local press... 
"Porcelain...a dizzying on-stage array...Porcelain's estimable range...is at once buoyant and mesmerizing..." Kevin Bronson/L.A. TIMES 
"Time to add some Porcelain to your collection... Singer Lo Roberts...flaunts a natural stage presence not a million miles removed from that of Gwen Stefani, and easily lures listeners into her complex, occasionally confrontational world. Porcelain isn't like many other bands out there. That's what makes it so valuable," Dean Goodman (Editor)/REUTERS Entertainment Review 
Porcelain signed directly to Universal/Motown while remaining with the small Indie label Wizard in their homeland. Porcelain wrote their first record on the shores of the Australian coast, and in the heart of Los Angeles. These sessions included working with Linda Perry (4 Non-Blondes,Pink, Gwen Stefani), Mike Elizondo (50 Cent, Eminem, Fiona Apple) and Holly Knight (Aerosmith, Pat Benatar). Their album was mixed by Serban Ghenea (Dave Matthews, Kelly Clarkson, Staind) and was Produced by Mike Green (Paramore, Plain White T's). 
Porcelain is a truly original band with great songs and amazing stage presence – reminiscent of the super bands of yesteryear. 
Porcelain Myspace Page  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryaneco (talk • contribs) 04:09, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Porcelain [band]
Talk:Jiro Yoshihara

message: Jirō Yoshihara died on February 10, 1972. Therefore, the copyright of Yoshihara is under protection. But Artanisen pasted a photo of a painting by Yoshihara on this article. Artanisen, please stop infringing other people's copyrights. --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 06:21, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, sorry I checked the date of the artwork which is 1928. If it infringes on the copyright due to the artists deceased date 1972 then it can be deleted. Artanisen (talk) 06:41, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio
Talk:Sancai

message: Why are there four images of four statues of the same type from the same museum? And three Italian pottery, two Syrian ones, two horses? There should be no more than one per type to illustrate the point otherwise you risk overburdening the article with images. Anything else can be seen on the Commons, that's what it's there for. Gryffindor (talk) 19:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many images
Talk:Blanc-de-Chine

message: The merge proposal is initiated by User:Marshall46
#Blanc-de-Chine
#Dehua porcelain factories
#Dehua white porcelain in Japan
I think these three articles should be merged to one article because The three are overlapped and all at start status. I think Blanc-de-Chine could absorb the others but I'm not sure this French title is "common name in English speaking world for the porcelains produced in Dehua. According to Britannica it is named as "Dehua porcelain". --Appletrees (talk) 01:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *58,500 for "Blanc-de-Chine", the great majority of which seem to be in English. Johnbod (talk) 02:24, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: * True and that's why the article was created under this title but I thought "Dehua porcelain" is the technical name of it. In fact Blanc-de-Chine is a loanword; a pseudo-Gallicism which still in use. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up®  03:37, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: * I thought Dehua porcelain embraces all porcelains made in Dehua because just like the name, Blanc-de-Chine seems to limit only 'white porcelains'. However, the French name is obviously dominantly being used, so keeping at it is appropriate but I prefer the title subtracts the hyphen. --Appletrees (talk) 04:34, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Depending on how much is written, they could be added as sections to b d c, or given their own article. Johnbod (talk) 19:26, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge proposal
Talk:Ding ware

message: (Sigh)
Well, "Ding ware" is a terrible name for these products since the standard for these pages is "~ porcelain" (cf. Vincennes porcelain, Kraak porcelain, &c) and the name should equally apply to ding cauldrons... but apparently it's simply accepted as a phrase in reference to Chinese products. Google Scholar has 19 'porcelain's to 198 'ware's. Blehhh... — LlywelynII 08:54, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably because a high proportion of sources DON'T describe them as porcelain at all, but as stoneware - see the article.  "Fooware" is the best and most widely-used term for all such broad categories. Johnbod (talk) 17:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Famille jaune, noire, rose, verte

message: I feel like it should be "Familles jaune, noire, rose and verte", for clarity. Srnec (talk) 17:18, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm - it wasn't before. The plural would make it seem that the list of names is itself a term, which it isn't.  It might be more grammatical, but I'm not sure it is clearer.  The "and" might be a good idea.   Johnbod (talk) 18:36, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Stephanie Topalian

message: I understand why this page is titled the way it is, to disambiguate between two singers commonly called simply "Stephanie." But it's not likely to be found in a search, and since this Stephanie has an actual last name, would that not be a simpler way to title it? There can always be a disambig page if it causes confusion. · rodii · 19:08, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange page title 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs (talk) 21:17, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Stephanie (singer, born August 1987) →  – Much more natural disambiguation used by sources such as ref1, ref2, and herself (website, Instagram). Can still be listed at Stephanie (disambiguation). See also: . Hameltion (talk | contribs) 19:51, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

text: I think your last sentence should be See also: . —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 04:02, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, thanks. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 04:47, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 October 2023
Talk:Shiwan ware

message: Warning tags placed. This appears to be an original work and unverifiable. Alternate translation available? 
Article seems unimportant. Enfermero (talk) 07:58, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: old

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:26, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Treaty of Akhal

message: After Temurids, Iran and Transoxiania were separate. During the early Qajar era, Iran had some claims on Merv and the surrounding area, but not on Khwarazm and Transoxiania. Akhal treaty didn't separate Transoxiania from Iran (Transoxiania and Iran were already separate at that time). Alefbe (talk) 06:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Relation between Iran and Transoxiania

message: Why would Iran even mount "much of a defense"? I. A. Zinov'ev, the Russian officer in Persia, had obtained Persia's full-fledged support in securing the logistics of the Russian campaign. Roknwoddellah, the brother of the Shah, was lavished with favors and even put in charge of base camps! Qajar Persia had been sort of a Russian client-state since the Treaty of Turkmenchay.
Huh? The Shah expressed relief at Russian victory and congratulated them. TrangaBellam (talk) 13:43, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate claims 

message: Was the "secret agreement" — concerning the boundary between Baba Dormaz and the Sarakhs — signed the same day? I doubt this because this involved the Qajar Shah mapping the terrains. TrangaBellam (talk) 14:17, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doubts
Talk:Materials MASINT

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met.   With appropriate citations and references, this article would easily qualify as B class if not higher.   --dashiellx (talk) 17:45, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Clandestine human intelligence

message: Does the "i" in ideology really need to be in bold throughout the article? 24.252.50.236 (talk) 05:28, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought it more readable. If you'd like to unbold all those MICE letters, it won't hurt my feelings. Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 05:40, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I went though and removed a lot of bolded words, including these, because the bolding is distracting.  I'm going to add a cleanup tag for a copyediting pass (I need a second opinion).  RJFJR (talk) 21:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Clandestine cell system

message: I edited this, in the section on external support there was a reference to Iran supporting shia cells in Iraq, this is too debatable a statement to be given as fact in an unrelated article without any source. Please see US-Iran relations#Iran and Iraq
thanks Mancgollum (talk) 03:56, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Blair Waldorf Must Pie!

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.tv.com/gossip-girl/blair-waldorf-must-pie!/episode/1146399/recap.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 10:14, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Mapepire Balsain

message: Why is this a CSD R3?
:It is a recently-created redirect page resulting from an implausible typo
It isn't a recently created page, and it isn't a typo.  I am utterly confused.  Guettarda (talk) 19:17, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry. The title of this redirect is capitalized, which is contrary to the latest MOS guidelines. I've already created the lower case Mapepire balsain to replaced it. I'd don't know of any better way to delete these kinds of redirects. See also this conversation: Superfluous redirects. --Jwinius (talk) 19:31, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion?
Talk:Frustule

message: This page appears to have been lifted from this website.  Can someone confirm its status vis-a-vis copyright violation?  Cheers, --Plumbago (talk) 17:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy-vio

message: Might it be an idea to move this article to the singular frustule?  That's certainly suggested in the guidelines on article titles.  --Plumbago (talk) 17:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. — Satori Son 02:13, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: I added a link there to a paper proposing a mechanism for the silicate deposition process. The paper contains other references to frustule formation that may be of interest. --AJim (talk) 21:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  syneresis 

message: The 3rd link/reference seems to be dead: http://www/iscod.org/encyclopedia/Frustule
also, replacing www/ with www. doesn't help. Content was probably removed from the website?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DrMorris (talk • contribs) 14:29, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  links/references
Talk:Vegni

message: I have added the copyright sentence to the source pages, which I created, own and maintain.
See at www.vegni.org.
The current content is different, and will be increasingly more differentiated from the original website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by  Nandovegni (talk • contribs) 
:Copyright release can be seen here http://vegni.org/medioeval.aspx nancy   (talk) 17:34, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Garrigues

message: I deleted a reference to garrigues as "a type of limestone geographical feature in Southern France" as inaccurate. The limestone is always referred to as chaux, and the vegetation on which it is based is known as garrigue, or in the plural, garrigues. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 17:28, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limestone 

message: The MoS:dab states that pipes should not be used in dab pages.  Accordingly, I removed them, again.  
Look, I understand that some people believe that there's a comarca in Spain that should be called "Les Garrigues," not "Garrigues."  That's fine, but that doesn't change the prohibition against piping in dab pages.  Perhaps you could use, as an alternative:
* Garrigues (comarca), also known as "Les Garrigues," a comarca (county) in Catalonia, Spain
Bry9000 (talk) 18:04, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No Pipes
Talk:Politics in Futurama

message: Temporal Paradox!
This snippet doesn't make sense to me:
The episode was nominated for the Environmental Media Award in 2003.[10] Al Gore's appearance in the episode, spoofing An Inconvenient Truth, was also listed as one of the 20 best animated politicians by The Phoenix.[7]
The problem herein is that An Inconvienient Truth was not released until 2006. The episode aired in 2003. How can Gore have been spoofing something that didn't exist yet? Unless time travel is involved, this needs some editing.--71.110.43.95 (talk) 02:33, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps he really has "001100010010011110100001101101110011" tattooed onto his buttocks! But you're right, that appearance is only spoofing Gore's stance on environmentalism, not An Inconvenient Truth itself, so it's been removed. ~Matticus UC 10:27, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An anon editor noted  that information from "A Big Piece of Garbage" should be included in the environmentalism section. Unfortunately, as evident from the episode's own article, I have had difficulty finding any sources discussing that particular episode.It does seem like some mention should be made so if anybody has anything they could add and cite... Stardust8212 14:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for "A Big Piece of Garbage"? 