Talk:Wedding Crashers

message: I really question the neautrality of this article.  Take for example the following passage:
"It was also very well received by critics, who admired the natural chemistry between Wilson and Vaughn, comparing them in some instances to Paul Newman and Robert Redford in Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (the comparisons might have been inspired by the very similar carefree bike-riding scenes found in both movies). The film also had extremely long legs, grossing over $209 million. This is quite a feat, considering most movies that made around $33 million in their opening weekend only managed about $100 million in 2005."
Could this possibly sound MORE like something written by a studio PR shill?  Please!  Also, I think it's downright misleading to say the movie was "very well received by critics", unless you're literally referring to the small number of critics that gave it an overwhelmingly positive reveiw.  A quick scan of the most well know external reviewers on IMBD.com will quickly show a clear consensus average review of 2 stars (out of 4).  I think a more accurate decription would be "received mixed, but generally positive reviews", or something similar to that. Ron Stock. 18:17, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fluff Piece

message: Would'nt this be pretty appropriate, it seems most articles on wikipedia with long list sooner or later get them moved to wikiqoute, and then a link to the article...
--Konstantin 16:51, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm moving it to wikiquote... If anyone objects then you can always revert... --Konstantin 14:28, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving list to Wikiqoute?

message: Why are there two production headers? This is a drive-by post: I just viewed the article to find out the general plot, I haven't seen the actual film. -- Annie D 12:14, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Production

message: I moved the rules to Wikiquote per WP:IINFO and WP:NOTABILITY.  Just because these rules are mentioned in the movie does not make them notable.  Only a handful of these rules are actually mentioned in the movie, and when they are mentioned they are basic one-liners with little context in the conversation.  The rules can be found at The Wedding Crashers Rules on Wikiquote.  Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 07:20, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Rules of Wedding Crashing list is from the official DVD. It is from an official source and should be included on the page. - 67.41.85.95 (talk) 14:54, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

text: Hey, I Have No Idea To Rules 2806:109F:15:6127:60C8:E175:8B62:93F2 (talk) 10:36, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved Rules of Wedding Crashing

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:17, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject class rating

message: Why is Apatow credited with production of this film, did he have any involvement?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JTWoodsworth (talk • contribs) 23:44, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Judd Apatow?

message: Why is Judd Apatow being associated with this film if he had nothing to do with it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JTWoodsworth (talk • contribs) 08:36, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Apatow Style

message: To the person who put that link & the instructions for it up:either explain how to do it/how you did it or the link will be removed in seven days from today. I have attempted to follow your instructions and they got me nowhere. 98.193.77.218 (talk) 08:28, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the link because it really has no useful information to which we should be linking. Carl.bunderson (talk) 22:03, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I was actually going to wait to see if the person who posted the link & instructions was going to explain how to do whatever. But, if the majority thought is that the link is irrelevant, then I'm glad it's gone. 98.193.77.218 (talk) 05:24, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, if I find a link questionable I tend to delete it, because the EL sections tend to get crufty very quickly. Carl.bunderson (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 05:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: About the "Trailer Crashers" link...

message: Someone seems to have changed the Plot section from being overly detailed to reading like something you would find on the back of the box. In fact, it looks so much like it, that I wouldn't be surprised at all if that is where it is from. 64.91.186.214 (talk) 02:56, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: Dwight Yoakam and Rebecca De Mornay have short roles, no cameos.--77.180.62.40 (talk) 09:51, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cameos?