lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chagpori

message: It's typically romanized as Chagpori to reflect both spelling (with an extra h) and pronunciation. Where the heck does "Chokpori" come from? I've never seen it before and it doesn't reflect spelling or pronunciation at all.
Joechip123 (talk) 06:03, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the deal with the spelling? 

message: I'm correcting some bad info on here. The Mentsikhang was founded in 1916 and was not at the same site as Chagpori. Joechip123 (talk) 06:15, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad info 

message: I've gone ahead and changed the title of the article so it's spelt Chagpori. I've never seen Chokpuri in my life, and that spelling makes no sense whatsoever given both the Wylie transliteration of the word and its pronunciation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joechip123 (talk • contribs) 03:45, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved to Chagpori 
Talk:Chinteni

message: "The commune of Cătina is officially bilingual, with both Romanian and Hungarian languages being recognised officially and used in public signage, education, justice and access to public administration" - please indicate the source. --Roamataa 13:10, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Swain

message: It is found that Swain is an English surname and entitled to English people. But Swain surname people are also found in a state of India named Orissa.These people are belonged to "chasa" cast which has been traditionally assigned to rule and to fight(they are known as warriors).
So,is there any relationship between these English people and Oriya people.
         THAT is what i know about swain is bucause my last name is swain and it is a page of thing on swain talk.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.119.53.140 (talk) 23:52, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Davis Cup player

message: I'd like to suggest that the leading bullet be removed, as it breaks external link template conventions. Still easy to fix, as this template is not yet widely used. GregorB 13:25, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bullet

message: The template redirects to a dead link since www.daviscup.com has been upgraded. Lajbi Holla @ me • CP 10:33, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead

message: Davis Cup changed all codes of players, Berdych, it doesn't look good. :o --Kacir 02:06, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New player codes
Template talk:Davis Cup team

message: See Template talk:DavisCupplayerlink, same applies here. GregorB 13:26, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bullet

message: The template redirects to a dead link since www.daviscup.com has been upgraded. Lajbi Holla @ me • CP 10:32, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead
Talk:Magical tools in Wicca

message: 1. There are a number of ritual objects used in Wicca, it would be helpful to know exactly which items constitute a "tool," and which items do not. A 'tool' is simply an object that can be given or possesses magical properties. Some tools have been popularized by Wiccan 'icons,' such as Gerald Gardner. Example- the knife, pentacle amongst others.  ie - in the case of the Chalice, the paragraph reads Many Wiccans do not consider it to be a tool, but instead to be a symbol of the Goddess, particularly her womb.
2. Is jewelry actually considered a tool?
3. Consecrating tools - Are tools consecrated before each use, or only once.  Under what circumstances, if any, would a tool have to be re-consecrated or discarded or destroyed?  Something like a Torah or Quran, for example have to be discarded if they are damaged or simply reach the end of their useful life. 
4. Maybe the article should be moved to something like "Ritual objects used in Wicca," with tools under their own heading.  
I know the answers to these questions, but I'm posing them here before I go about making any changes to the article.  Valgrus Thunderaxe (talk) 07:38, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: There hasn't been any objections to my concerns regarding this article on the talk page, so I'm going to start making chances to this article today.  Feel free to revert.  Valgrus Thunderaxe (talk) 11:25, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further suggestions 

message: — Assignment last updated by MoonFlower.l (talk) 06:50, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: HUM 202 - Introduction to Mythology

message: Although it given as the link from the disambiguation page for the word Stang, this Wiki article does not, in fact, cover the stang (a kind of forked staff) among the ritual tools of Wicca. Could something be done to remedy the omission? I appreciate that the stang is actually associated with Traditional Witchcraft in contradistinction to Wicca; though it will be appreciated that, in uninitiated parlance, the two are readily confused.
Nuttyskin (talk) 21:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stang
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Miskin/Evidence

message: Thebainer thanks for your analysis, I find it very useful at this point. However I would like to point out that this edit  was made as a compromise, and by no means as a revert. Many of Mardavich's points were respected, such as keeping his non-neutral point of view about speaking abstractly of an "Iran" (rather than "in modern Iran"), his claims on a "heroic last stand" and specifying "Macedonians" rather than Greeks. Proof that this was meant as a compromise is the fact that the edit even to this point stands as the standard lead in the article Battle of the Persian Gate. This proves that it was a successful compromise. Only today (18/5) there was a minor edit on wiki-linking last stand . How can it be claimed that an accepted edit in a controversial article was a fourth revert (and by consenquence edit-warring and disruptive editing)? Even if my word is not to be accepted, the hypothesis on a partial revert is refuted by the course of the events. Miskin 13:34, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The fourth revert

message: Perhaps I'm wrong, but it seems to me that no email should be posted on the evidence page without the sender's permission, including the email from an unknown sender that Swatjester recently posted. Obviously, the email is relevant, but it should be sent to the ArbCom mailing list, rather than posted here. --Akhilleus (talk) 05:26, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this is very useful, a point is about to be made. Swatjester's entry will be very enlightening to the ArbCom case and all malicious allegations that are being constantly made against me. Miskin 13:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note, so far only one of the mailers has requested that I keep the emails private. So if I hear back, then we may be good. ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 03:22, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Email evidence
Talk:Harry L. Straus

message: According to my notes, this man's name was Henry Straus, but I'm wondering if I had bad source.  The two external link articles listed give "Harry".  Can anyone enlighten?  Did he go by both names, or is "Henry" just incorrect? Robert K S 13:34, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: His name in the 1913 yearbook of his high school, Baltimore City College, is Henry Lobe Straus, but he was inducted into that school's hall of fame as Harry L. Straus.67knight 00:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why thank you!  That goes a way toward solving the mystery. Robert K S 01:30, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Harry or Henry?
Talk:Stratford, County Wicklow

message: Stratford, also known as Stratford-on-Slaney, is a small village on the River Slaney in West  Wicklow in Ireland. - 14:25, May 19, 2007 Ww2censor 
Indeed Ww! That is what I always knew it as and I was going to call the article by that name till I noticed the sign; checking around I couldn't find much support for Stratford-on-Slaney online; so rather than have some revert it I settled for Stratford. But I can personally attest that 20 years ago it was universally known as Stratford-on-Slaney in SW Wicklow. (Sarah777 13:36, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stratford-on-Slaney
Talk:Pu-Ba'lu

message: I just made this article-(after Yursa), and ended by adding more stuff to the meaning of his name. Simplest terms:
:Pu – Baal isVoice -- Baal, the "Voice (of) Baal". .....Soooo....when one says:  "Pu-Ba'lu", or thinks it, they are really saying: "Voice (of) Baal"- ("Speech of Baal" sounds Stiff, but Baal Speaks could work)-----.. -From the SonoranDeserts ofArizona -Mmcannis 13:39, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pu-Ba'lu, his name

message: Pu-Ba'lu but also several others used this same phrase Stjohn1970 (talk) 16:19, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  7 times and 7 times
Talk:Tom Gammill and Max Pross

message: Thanks everyone for the clean-up by the way!
I added a list of the Seinfeld episodes Tom wrote, but is there a better way of formatting and presenting them do you think? Warchef 13:42, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seinfeld episodes 

message: Tom Gammill is now writing a comics feature for Universal Press Syndicate called The Doozies.
http://www.gocomics.com/thedoozies/
However I don't believe it is part of a partnership with Pross. Can this information be included in the article as it exists?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Calydon (talk • contribs) 00:56, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Doozies
Talk:La Macarena, Meta

message: Once again the allegedlys! wikipedia is not a kitchen for gossip and rumors started by Uribe's political opposition. Needless to say this article is about a town. How about improving the article about the town first and then discuss about inserting that type of information. That type of information should be in wikinews--Amnesico29 (talk) 08:06, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks ok to me, it has both sides. I do agree that the town part should be expanded though. --AW (talk) 19:16, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Western Mail (Western Australia)

message: Because I doubt that WA Newspapers was in existence in 1855, I've rationalised the first section heading to "Published 1855-1955" and given similar treatment to the next. Anyway, I think it's more useful to relate these different papers to their historical times than company names. Bjenks (talk) 16:01, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section heads
Talk:Aghireșu

message: Something's wrong. This is an article about the administrative division called Aghireşu commune. In the lead and the infobox name we cannot use several names in different languages (this would be like calling the Cluj county - Kolozs county). Names in other languages can be specified in a Names parapraph or in the names in other languages portion of the infobox. --Roamataa 13:56, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Volunteer vacation

message: Wow.  The tone is cynical and political.  Not what I count on from Wikipedia.  The entry started out so neutral and verifyable last year.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.161.179.35 (talk) 20:19, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've had a go at it.  Mainly meant lots of deletion.  If this does not meet concerns, please restore tags and add more details here.  Thanks.  -- SiobhanHansa 19:06, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone
Talk:Palm Multi-Connector

message: "NOTE: These pinouts are actually the OPPOSITE of the pinout documentation at palm.com. Also, these documentation fails to document the Ground pins that are actually counted as part of the system. To get an "accurate" pinout, please sign up for a developers account on palm and look for 'palm one developer's guide'"
Umm... if these are the opposite then why has nobody either reversed the numbers or changed the diagram yet? --Anidnmeno 14:01, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:American Volunteer Group

message: I had planned to create an article on the 2nd AVG bomber group, but am having second thoughts. Would it perhaps be better to recast this article as having three headings, one for each AVG unit deployed or planned? The 1st AVG would of course be very brief and linked to the Flying Tigers article. The 2nd AVG section would be the longest, since this group was actually recruited and equipped, though aborted after 7 Dec 1941. The 3rd AVG section would again be short, since it was only planned, never recruited or equipped. Thoughts? I will ask this also on the Flying Tigers discussion page .AVGbuff (talk) 20:14, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds fine. BTW, is it time for you to have something on your user page? FWiW, your user name still comes up as a "redlink". Bzuk (talk) 20:17, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 2nd Avg, 3rd AVG

message: In consequence, not all the members of the 1st AVG were recruited from the US Army Air Corps.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.8.98.118 (talk) 10:43, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Gregory Boyington]] was from the US Marine Air Corps 

message: The summary section contains some facts not supported by the main text.
Perhaps some of this should be moved to a 'Planning' section.
Graeme374 (talk) 09:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary Section 

message: In which month of 1941 did Roosevelt make the authorization? I reckon it would be useful to add this in the opening section as it would highlight this was a pre-Pearl Harbor move. LukeSurl t c 01:23, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I found it, April 15, 1941. LukeSurl t c 01:26, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Month of authorization
Talk:Royal Merchant

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Due to minimal participation, this RM is termed as unopposed. (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 09:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Merchant Royal →  – The article, which formerly stated the ship's name was Royal Merchant, and the references, which are a mix of "Royal Merchant" and "Merchant Royal", make it unclear what the WP:COMMONNAME for this subject is. I mean, the only reason I support the move I'm proposing is that it was the previous status quo when this article was written ... so literally anyone with a stronger case than this to "support" or "oppose" this move should take precedence over my nomination statement. Steel1943 (talk) 22:52, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 March 2023
Talk:Stewart Iglehart

message: Eddie Eagan won a gold medal for the US in boxing at the 1920 Summer Olympics, and another gold medal in the four-man bobsled at the 1932 Winter Olympics. It may be true that Iglehart was the only person to represent the US internationally in two different team sports, but I suspect that the fact (unfortunately listed on the front page of Wikipedia) is simply incorrect. Sonitus (talk) 00:24, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow that is a pretty glaring omission I took the information out of his United States Hockey Hall of Fame biography it states: "Stewart Iglehart occupies a unique position in American sports, being the only man to have represented the United States internationally in two sports: hockey on the 1933 World Championship Team and polo in the 1936 International Match." I'll change the article. It mentions nothing about them being specifically team sports and I expected something coming from the United States Hockey Hall of Fame to be reliable.--Mo Rock...Monstrous  (leech44) 00:40, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Shaun White has also represented the US in two sports - skateboarding and snowboarding - though only one (snowboarding) was at an Olympic Games. His representations as a skateboarder were at the X-Games which, while internationally recognised, may not qualify as official representation of the US. Given the first example, I'm not sure you could even say Iglehart is the only person to have represented the US in two different sports at the Olympic Games. If it's widened to international competitions generally, then definitely not. Stalwart111 (talk) 01:00, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the only person to represent the US in two sports!
Talk:Youssef Hmimssa

message: Isn't this the guy, who according to Adam Curtis was a convicted con artist and whose lies , when discovered, destroyed the case against the Buffalo Six?
I'm going to try and put some of this stuff in the article, properly cited. The article as it stands is pathetic. Potashnik 14:26, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It was Detroit, not Buffalo... -Potashnik 14:31, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  My bad 

message: the information in the 9/11 section is not cited and looks like it should be tagged as "controversial" as well... or at least biased, since there is no defense of the statements made...
71.234.109.192 03:25, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Talk:Glitter / Fated c/w Secret

message: Alright! So let's make this page as big and as comprehensive as we possibly can. If you look at pages for singles from American artists, they usually have really big pages with tons of info and charts. Let's make this page awesome like those! Some stuff I'd like to bring up first though:
===Capitalization===
It's a rule on Wikipedia that no matter how the cd title is capitalized on the CD or on the artist's website(s), we have to start the song title with a capital letter and the rest have to be small. For example, although Glitter is written as "glitter", technically we have to capitalize it as Glitter. That's just proper English!
===Charts===
I made up the template for the charts after I gathered sites and lists of charts from all over Japan. When the single is released, please try your best to check the sites regulary for Ayu's chart position(s) so that we can have a full list! 
===Posting Rumours===
Rumors are not supposed to be posted on Wikipedia, only facts. Please don't post anymore "rumoured tracklists" or anything like that. Also please provide as many sources as possible while writing.
Thanks!Evolution7931 14:26, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: yeahyeahyeahyeah . MAKE IT GREAT ^^  (Impracticable 16:42, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Yay!

message: Rumors are not supposed to be posted on Wikipedia, only facts. Please don't post anymore "rumoured tracklists" or anything like that. Also please provide as many sources as possible while writing.
Thanks!Evolution7931 14:26, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: yeahyeahyeahyeah . MAKE IT GREAT ^^  (Impracticable 16:42, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Posting Rumours
Talk:Proto-Polynesian language

message: I took the liberty of adding the table of Polynesian Sound Correspondences from the Tongan language article.
embryomystic 14:30, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sound Correspondences Table 

message: Hello. There's a mistake: "hahine" is the Rapanui word for "near, next to". "vi'e" is the Rapanui for "woman". Nevertheless, the word "(tama)hahine" is used as a suffix to show gender: "poki tamaaroa" (son), "poki tamahahine" (daughter), "taína tamaaroa" (brother), "taína tamahahine" (sister), "tupuna tamaaroa" (grandfather), "tupuna tamahahine" (grandmother), "makupuna tamaaroa" (grandson), "makupuna tamahahine" (granddaughter), or, instead of "tamahahine", the word "vi'e" (poki vi'e, taína vi'e, tupuna vi'e and makupuna vi'e). (Englert, Sebastian P. "Idioma Rapanui: Gramática y Diccionario del antiguo idioma de la Isla de Pascua" Santiago: U. de Chile, 1978). Best wishes!--Alpinu (talk) 19:32, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rapanui words

message: I will take up the task of expanding this article to include history, PPN's place inside the Austronesian language family, and the conclusions drawn by Pawley, Green, Blust, et al., regarding the homeland of PPN speakers. I am brand new to Wikipedia and only "joined" to correct some mistakes in this article. I am having real trouble with formatting right now, but I'm learning.  I also noted that although Hawaiian and Samoan use the inverted apostrophe or okina, Tahitian and many other Polynesian languages use a simple apostrophe <'>.
Please let me know if you catch errors. I have a lot of reference material on Polynesian languages that actually conflict with each other, so I will never claim to be the last word.
MauiPoet (talk) 11:40, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion of All Sections 

message: Just noting that the table should include Rapanui within Eastern Polynesian . Piwaiwaka (talk) 08:32, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  sound correspondences table incorrect
Talk:Age of Empires III: The Asian Dynasties

message: Issues:
* Lead: "The Asian Dynasties achieved gold status on September 28, 2007.[1] The demo version of the game was released on October 4, 2007,[7] while the full version was released in North America on October 23, 2007.[1] The game was generally received well by critics, with an 80% score on Game Rankings and Metacritic.[8][9] " – What is ‘gold status’ and why should anyone care? What makes the release of the demo so special (was there early reaction to it?) What were some general praise/complaints about the expansion? (Also funnels into development- you mention it was a partnership with Big Huge Games and Ensemble, that could certainly be mentioned in the lead.)
**Done. dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 02:09, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks better, I'll pass. David Fuchs (talk) 19:31, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 23:41, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GAN

message: There's a missing citation and a completely uncited section. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 19:40, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alert to editors, so it doesn't get a GAR. 

message: I reworded the campaign like this. The last statement saying that he ran off was just wrong and WP:OR. The game at minimum leaves it open to interpretation, but I according to me, if anything, the game hinted the opposite...he chose to remain loyal despite knowing the truth. Either way, I erred on the side of caution and left it open. Also I found that this plot was either copied from or to the fandom site. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 19:26, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese campaign ending
Talk:Gibrat's law

message: "In the study of the firms (business), the scholars do not agree that the foundation and the outcome of Gibrat's law are empirically correct.[citation needed][12]"
The used source to justify the statement above was antithetical to the statement. The paper sourced showed that annual sales growth was independent to scale (although the noise decreased exponentially). This paper seems to support Gibrat's law.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.89.82.168 (talk) 22:13, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Source for statement

message: I might be wrong here, but isn't the application to city sizes just a side note for Gibrat's law?
That section seems to have too much weight here.
149.148.63.51 (talk) 18:12, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope of the article