lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jigsaw Classroom

message: This seems to be an article about how great Jigsaw Classroom is, not an encyclopedia about what it is. The section entitled 'Basic Jigsaw Formula' looks sort of like an instruction manual (Wikipedia:Not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_manual.2C_guidebook.2C_or_textbook). Horsesforcorses (talk) 20:35, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This

message: Before I discovered this page I created another encyclopedia entry for the "Jigsaw (teaching technique)." I think some of the problems commented on in this discussion are avoided in my version, but I would welcome suggestions and comments. My article is Jigsaw (teaching technique)  CoachWade (talk) 19:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely should be merged; it's the same idea worded differently. I don't see anything wrong with the section outlining the method, but there is no significant difference between the focus of both pages. 124.154.253.49 (talk) 01:18, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll set up the merge, but it will require substantial work from editors to make the resulting article any good.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:52, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Ronald Gene Simmons

message: No sources sited so it's not clear that this was not simply copied whole-sale:
http://www.fortunecity.com/roswell/hammer/73/simmons.html
Craig Pemberton (talk) 06:11, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarised 

message: Renata was my first cousin...and I will never forget that year - ever.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.233.100.30 (talk) 07:31, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same as above 

message: Perhaps we can include information from these two videos {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uawgH2ugtY&list=LLItb2dLp-6NlYuBFl4AwvKg&index=19, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvsEzt999ow} into the article. The video says he won numerous awards whilst in the military, which is something noteworthy, among numerous other facts. Citadel48 (talk) 22:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information 

message: Why does it list crowbar and hammer in the weapons used if all victims were killed by strangulation, drowning or gunshot as listed in the victims section?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.6.84.111 (talk) 18:26, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weapons used 

message: What was the motivation behind the murders?  If known, it should be added into the article.  Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 03:28, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motive?
Talk:Subaltern Studies

message: Is he deceased or not? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.131.56.31 (talk) 00:38, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guha death 

message: As founding members, it seems that their scholarship is at least as important as other historians with individual bio pages... 24.125.38.175 (talk) 16:45, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bios for Arnold & Hardiman 

message: I propose that only people who have edited and/or contributed to any of the SS volumes be listed as scholars associated with the group. The addition of Touraj Atabaki is absurd!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.180.28.179 (talk) 19:03, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria? 

message: I think there is problem with the title being Subaltern Studies and then the opening being about the Subaltern Studies Group. I think it might be best to relegate the group to a section. Any thoughts or should I just give it a go? (Msrasnw (talk) 21:39, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subaltern Studies or Subaltern Studies Group
Talk:Family Law (American TV series)

message: Meredith Eaton self-identifies as a little person, not a dwarf.  The term 'midget' is usually highly offensive; 'dwarf' is less so, but still not the preferred term.  She uses the term quite specifically in an interview for this article: .  It's like calling someone 'crippled' instead of 'disabled.'  I don't see any problem with the language of the article as it stands now.  -- Vary | Talk 19:52, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, there's nothing wrong with having a redlink in an article.  This way, when someone creates her article, the links will already be in place, and if enough articles link to her before her article is created, she'll show up on Wikipedia:Most wanted articles. Red links are not necessarily a bad thing. -- Vary | Talk 20:00, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I started her article.--T. Anthony 12:11, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This artical is a stub.--24.159.227.8 (talk) 21:19, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a start. -- 109.76.213.6 (talk) 05:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Class

message: Paul Haggis was fired from this show. He's mentioned it interviews as it spurred him to write Million Dollar Baby and Crash. Didn't say why though, so I don't think I have enough detail to add it to the article. -- 109.76.213.6 (talk) 05:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Fired
Talk:Vanga Kingdom

message: What is the meaning of Vanga? — HenryLi (Talk) 04:09, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The name is not found in early Vedic literature per Macdonell (so likely not to be of Vedic Sanskrit/Indo-Aryan origin), could be ultimately of Dravidian origin. The exact origins are unclear though. Gotitbro (talk) 05:25, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology of Vanga 

message: The article had been stable without the mention of Indo-Aryan in the lead for years now, until an IP decided to contravene that judgement. Ironically enough the reference that was added even mentions Vanga as non-Aryan.
These claims were then re-inforced by a new user , who has added different refs (which aren't exactly WP:HISTRS or WP:SECONDARY) which further still don't support the claims. Let us analyse the refs that were added:
Encyclopedia of India () says this: "The name "Bengal" (or Bangla) comes from Vanga or Banga, the name of the ancient deltaic kingdom." It talks about the etymology nowhere is Indo-Aryan mentioned either explicitly or implicitly.
Banglapedia (): "Vanga an ancient janapada or human settlement in Eastern Bengal." The only mention of Indo-Aryan is this, "In the Baudhayana Dharmasutra the Vangas are mentioned in a list of peoples who lived in regions beyond the zone of Aryan civilisation in the neighbourhood of Kalinga." Which quite emphatically contradicts what is being claimed.
Globalsecurity.org: "Different sects of people came and established their estates, including Aryans in the post-Vedic period." To be noted that the Vangas are from the Vedic era.
Ascribing [POV] ethnicities, which is mostly avoided due to sketchy historical accounts, to past kingdoms and empires has increased recently on Wikipedia mostly by users who are not familiar with wiki policies and drive-by edits by IPs. Even if the sources were upto the mark (which they aren't) ethnicities would be avoided in the WP:LEAD.
Following precedent I removed the ethnic origins from the lead which as mentioned had been stable without it for quite some time. But this is being re-added without discussion (as appealed to) or even basic following of WP:BRD.
PS: IMO, from what I can gather, the Vangas were originally non-Aryan (as also indicated by the etymological origins) and subsequently mixed/merged with the Aryans in the Late Vedic/post-Vedic era. But that is still no reason to include any of these ethnic origins in the WP:LEAD, though the Aryan etc. ethnic theories can still be added in the body but still not in the lead. Gotitbro (talk) 05:44, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Indo-Aryan"
Talk:Peterotica

message: # Well Written 
#: Written in Prose, spelling and grammar are fine.
#: Has decent lead section, is well laid out and doesn't read in an "in-universe" style
# Factually Accurate and Verifiable 
#: Contains no OR, is accurate and sourced appropriately. Sources are reliable with no use of blogs/fansites.
# Broad in coverage 
#: Covers the main plot and production details well.  Does not diverge into discussion of wider areas.
# Neutral 
# Stable 
#: Well maintained with no edit wars or frequent reversions
# Images 
#: uses one appropriate image which is sourced and copyright available.  
I review this article as a pass for GA status.  Well done, perhaps the nominator may like to review an article now?     --Brideshead(leave a message) 11:53, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Nomination
Talk:Treaty of Amritsar (1846)

message: ::Kautilya3 can you please stop being disruptive. You are removing huge sections of entire pages that are full of refences. I think the real reason why you oppose people adding content to wikipedia is because of the following statement on your talk page where you said:
::
::Thats like saying that the whole section on the Kashmir should not exist. Only the revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir page should exist. The treaty of Amritsar 1846 predates the creation of the Supreme Court of India. It was signed between the Sikh Empire and the British Empire. Please stop being disruptive. Johnleeds1 (talk) 13:56, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Milwaukee Public Museum

message: I think this article really needs a history. Anybody up for it?offical history
-Freekee 04:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a section on the history of the museum —Salmar 03:17, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: Why does the image work in Internet Explorer but not in Firefox? Is anyone else having this issue?--aviper2k7 03:35, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Aviper2k7.. it might be Firefox is working on a cached version of the page, from when Wikipedia's server was being flaky. Have you tried clearing the cache, or reloading the page while holding down the crtl key (or is it the shift key?). 72.131.44.247 04:43, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 
Talk:Jake Eberts

message: Thanks for the correction. I misread the notation 7/10/1941 at Hollywood.com. I am Canadian and we use a reverse format of day/month/year for dates. Sorry about that! BTW, I think it would be great to get a photo of your father for this page. Are you able to obtain a publicity photo that could be added to this article? Verne Equinox 20:14, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Message to Aeberts

message: This is a puff piece, not an encyclopedia article.  Disgraceful. 72.229.63.181 (talk) 06:52, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia is not intended for personal promotions
Talk:Fulham

message: The article says that Hammersmith became independent in 1834, but the Youngs Guide says 1631. I've left it as it is because it's referenced and there's a fair bit of detail it would be a shame to lose, even if its not quite right in its current form. AlasdairDaw (talk) 15:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Hammersmith
Talk:Regionalism (international relations)

message: There's a section on 'Regionalization' followed by one on 'National Politics'; they both give definitions of 'regionalization' but highly distinct ones. The first one is in accordance to the New Regionalisms Approach; the second one refers to another process, within states. Should be clarified (since I'm not a specialist on the second definition, perhaps someone else could).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.33.8.212 (talk) 13:07, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflicting definitions of 'regionalization'

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
#Support move so that we can disambiguate between regionalism between states and regionalism within states.  Kevlar67 02:05, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: #Support move so that we can disambiguate between regionalism between states and regionalism within states.  Kevlar67 02:05, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move
Talk:Javy López

message: Can somebody please post a photo of him in an Orioles uniform? That's the team he's on right now though that could possibly change very soon. OsFan 20:20, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: or even just a photo that would be nice two (braves fan looking for old pics :)) Chuck61007 00:32, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Javy is his frequently used nickname, but he's much more commonly called Javier Lopez.  WP seems to have re-christened him for the sake of dab.  --Alcuin 05:52, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  name 

message: according to the red sox official page on mlb.com he is left handed  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.33.43.6 (talk) 23:15, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  right handed 
Category talk:Ukrainian politicians before 1991

message: This category aimes to:
*unload the :Category:Ukrainian people a bit
*make a place for figures like Konovalets and Kubiyovych who are neither modern UA politicians (e.g. Kuchma) nor politicians of any country except "short-lived Ukrainian states".
Not sure about the name wording. Feel free to suggest changes. Ukrained 20:20, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:King George Secondary School

message: Remember that Alumni is not synonymous with Graduate. If someone formally attends the schools she or is an alumna/us. -- Usgnus 21:41, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alumni vs. graduates 
Talk:Vijay Diwas

message: The Hindu seems to think Vijay Diwas is all about celebrating Indian victory in Kargil (See). Times of India seems to think it is not a regular annual happening (See). And, does this have to be put in a Bangladesh category, while a see also link to the Bangladeshi Victory Day, which is a major happening in Bangladesh. Aditya Kabir 11:39, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massive check needed 

message: The article notes two different reasons for the celebration.  Which is it? -- Whpq 13:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction

message: From one of the references, is seems there might be something politically notable about this confusion. Could someone with better sources add this?
Also, it might be better to have images of the December 16 Vijay Diwas as well as for the July 26 Kargil Vijay Diwas.
Finally, the article could probably be fleshed out some from the current references. 68.183.26.130 (talk) 06:51, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: There Are Two Victory Days

message: New Pages should be created for Vijay diwas, one for kargil one and other for 1971. This way we can expand the articles. Please create pages with suitable names ASAP.
Thank you  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.180.0.40 (talk) 06:19, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Create new Pages

message: Two different pages have been linked on this page as they represent different events with the same name. This will help the user to obtain better information about the particular event.
Earlier both events were in the same page which created confusion.
Rohan (talk) 07:27, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vijay Diwas
Talk:National Ski Hall of Fame

message: I removed the following sentence 
:small articel re: youngest us skiteam member. winner of two gold cups and member of 1960 us ski team: Demiah Tate
from the article.  I am not sure what it is trying to say, but thought I'd move it here for further discussion. Thanks, --TeaDrinker 20:24, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Youngest member
Talk:Tipu Aziz

message: What's up with your heavy-handed edit summaries, demanding that other editors not change your edits, SlimVirgin. There were no square brackets in the Guardian article. To place them here implies Aziz said "eoples" thereby insinuating he is a poor speaker of English. The Guardian quoted him saying "People". Placing square brackets in the word to accomodate a concatentation of his quote places your personal editorial preferances above factual representation. It is not that hard to simply write the sentence accurately. I suggest you adopt a more collaborative attitude that respects sources who might not agree with your point of view. Sandagrila 20:25, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Square brackets around a lower-case letter indicate that the word was the first word of the sentence in the original but has been changed to be part of a sentence when quoted. Please do not remove them again. SlimVirgin (talk) 20:41, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Begum Hazrat Mahal

message: This is very badly written in places. It needs copyediting.[[Slatersteven (talk) 15:54, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write 

message: I removed the quotations section from the article. Each quote needs to be referenced and determined notable by a reliable media source. Not only that, it should provide more insight than that she was a good leader. For instance, if Karl Marx was inspired by Begum, cite how that influenced his own work. -AngusWOOF (talk) 13:20, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Added reference. As suggested (on my talk), will try to reformat the section to quote-table.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 17:18, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  quotations section moved 

message: Here are few notable quotes on Begum Hazrat Mahal, Queen of Awadh:
:Added reference. As suggested (on my talk), will try to reformat the section to quote-table.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 17:18, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotations about the Begum

message: Begum Hazrat Mahal was born in Mohammadi khanu she was the second wife of Nawab Alisha she died on 7 April 1879 in age of 15 and she also known as begum of the challenge British during revolt of 1857 youngsi pired called her the Tigers he become become after being accepted as a royal concubin of king award the leading role she had in the rebelling against the British East Indica. 2405:204:A091:A3D1:0:0:6BC:F0B0 (talk) 14:52, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: What edit do you wish to make? Slatersteven (talk) 15:14, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Begum Hazrat Mahal
Talk:110393 Rammstein

message: I don't think this is "Pantent nonsense," thus probably not speedible.  It may well be a hoax; I am investigating.  I'll report shortly. --TeaDrinker 20:31, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have not yet been able to confirm the existence of this object.  I can, however, confirm the existence of (a) an astronomer named "Jean Claude Merlin" , (b) the existence of a publication called teh minor planet circular , and (c) the informaiton in the header about the Smithsonian's relation to the minor planet center, etc. .  My view at this time is that the information is probably accurate, however possibly a copyvio from the minor planet circular.  I have not yet obtained a copy of the publication to verify it (it is a subscription service).  In the interim, I have removed the material likely to be copyrightted, since the text claims it as the source. --TeaDrinker 20:52, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hoax?

message: I have attempted a clean-up, since most of the article was copied from another site, but I would appreciate it if someone could check the infobox I added. Lithium (talk) 01:21, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: Legacy article 110393 Rammstein has been re-written as of January 2018. Rfassbind – talk 05:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 2018
Talk:Tebhaga movement

message: * 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
Tayi Arajakate Talk 10:53, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of sources from article improvement
Talk:Tashkent Declaration

message: the tashkent agreement resulted in president ayub khans fall because people of pakistan viewed it as a sell out as pakistan had captured more indian terrirtories as compared to india, and these lands were returned by president ayub khan by keeping a leinient stance towards india, this shud hav been mentioned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.153.94.28 (talk) 07:27, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the fact that 'The power of Ayub Khan Subsided after the pact' this has also been verified by a neutral source HISTORICAL OVERVIEW of Pakistan by US Dept. of State ( http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/3453.htm#history) . But i dont agree with statement that "Pakistan conquered more land" this was a propaganda spread by the Pakistan army to hide their losses in  the 1965 war. Please refer the full article Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1965for more details and a neutral perspective. --dBigXray (talk) 22:06, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  pakistani peoples point of view not mentioned 

message: The power of Ayub Khan declined after Pakistan lost the 1965 war. this can even be verified from a neutral Source Pakistan:HISTORICAL OVERVIEW US Dept. of State  http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/3453.htm#history . Besides the consequences and aftermath of this declaration are important to be discussed in short. Please do not remove this subsection. --dBigXray (talk) 22:03, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consequences of the [[Tashkent Declaration]] 
Talk:East Caucasian tur

message: If someone has time... or is even that interested could they please edit the repeated usage of "east caucasian tur" in the sentences when "it" or "they" could be used just as easily.L337wm2007 20:39, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good, a reference would be nice and maybe a category and ... :-) Vsmith 04:20, 15 March 2006 (UTC)