lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Teratophilia

message: User '*very sad and annoyed*' created this article from whole cloth in March after it'd been a redirect for TEN YEARS. It references Chuck Tingle, a comedy erotica author, Donkey from Shrek, Sans from Undertale, the Babadook... The whole article is a giant meme. The fact that people are actually expanding and building on this article instead of scrapping and rewriting it is an absolute joke. 68.101.188.202 (talk) 02:54, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does anyone else realize this article is an absolute joke 

message: Teratophilia is named as such because "philia" means abnormal fondness, "tera" is similar to terra, which means earth, which monsters come from, and "to" relates to toes, arguably the most erotic part of monster anatomy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:1241:8368:99E7:F83F:D597:B356 (talk) 12:55, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia
Talk:Lake Khövsgöl

message: Where are Modot tolgoi, Baga khüi islands (listed in infobox)? These islands are absent on 1:200 000 Soviet maps and 1:200 000 Mongolian maps. They appeared or dissolved? And mb it will be better not khüi but khui, like Modon khui and Khadan khui in Mongolian atlas (Авто Замын Атлас).Bogomolov.PL 16:02, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islands 

message: I moved the article back per google books count : "lake hovsgol", "hovsgol lake", "hovsgol nuur". I don't think the situation with other transcription variants is much different, if it is, feel free to change again. Yaan (talk) 20:07, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  moved back to Lake Khövsgöl 
Talk:List of language names

message: I think that it would be better not to have the ad hoc pronunciations now listed.  Perhaps IPA would be better.--Jaurisova6 11:19, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: @Jaurisova6 2001:FB1:148:8F4E:280F:3528:DA97:50EB (talk) 15:45, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

message: "Zhong Guo" does not mean The Middle Kingdom. This has been a mistranslation for centuries. Zhong Guo means "The Central National State" or "The National State at the Center (of the world)". 86.136.57.254 (talk) 20:14, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The translation of "Zhong Guo" is complex and nuanced...--达伟 (talk) 12:55, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  China 

message: Given the last two links on the page ("Back to the Lists Of Languages" and "See the list of languages around the world in Abaza"), it would appear this was lifted off the web without much care.  I'd think we'd want verification for anything we merge.  — kwami (talk) 16:11, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: What about Latin alphabet, used in most countries???
Piotr Walczak (talk) 18:41, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alphabets 

message: This would be better (clearer and more concise) as a table. ----Ehrenkater (talk) 16:39, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tabular form 

message: I don't see any citations for this page. How does this list align with Wikipedia citation standards? Hugh Paterson III (talk) 20:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a giant mess. The flags need to go per MOS:ICON, but I lack the time and energy to remove them all. FDW777 (talk) 14:31, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 
Talk:Lyudi Invalidy

message: Not a native speaker, so I'll ask: Why is Новая модель translated as Imperfect Model? I checked various dictionaries, and новый translates as new, modern, recent, novel, fresh, young etc. None of those meanings seems directly related to imperfect. --Leonard Vertighel (talk) 11:28, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation 
Talk:Abelian extension

message: I have no objection to the contents of this page.  However, I was redirected to it when I clicked on a link to "cyclic extension" of a group.  (From the page on Dicyclic groups.)  Well, this page covers cyclic extensions of fields, but not cyclic extensions of groups, so the redirection is not helpful.
Was there once a Wikipedia page defining a cyclic extension of a group?  If so, what has happened to it?
If anyone else is also looking for cyclic extension of a group, information can be found at Planet Math.
--195.8.171.130
:I've removed the incorrect links. Note that the definition of "cyclic extension" on PlanetMath is incompatible with the usage in the Dicyclic group article: one is using the term to mean that the kernel is cyclic, and the other is using it to mean that the quotient is cyclic. --Zundark 13:14, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The phrase "cyclic extension" is applied to a splitting field where the Galois group is cyclic in Richard Dean's article in American Mathematical Montly cited in quaternion group. Evidently the redirect to this article on Abelian Extension is inappropriate given the usage in non-commutative algebra. Dean gives theorems on such an extension, so there is content for a separate article.Rgdboer (talk) 21:56, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyclic extension
Talk:Streamline Pictures

message: No deleting the casts! Capisce? --Ryanasaurus0077 11:44, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Don't delete casts

message: If someone who knows more about Streamline than me were to merge these two versions, I think it would add greatly to the article. tregoweth 18:25, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Version merging 

message: Fred was the heart of Streamline and a superfan. - Sparky 06:03, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mention of Fred Patton

message: Could anyone please upload both of Streamline's logos? --Ryanasaurus0077 16:06, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logos 

message: IIRC,many of the old Streamline titles have been relicensed to other companies(i.e., Disney, ADV, Geneon, etc.). There may be other inaccuracies as well... Ranma9617 04:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  On retagging from unreferenced to not verified 

message: I deleted "Many of Streamline's English dubs later have had their copyrights run out, and have subsequently entered the Public Domain (such as Streamline's Lupin III: Mystery of Mamo dub)." for lack of reliable sources.  To rehash my comments from the Mamo talk section, I daresay it's impossible for Steamline's 1995 dub to have fallen in the US public domain, given the various upgrades and extensions given to US copyright laws. Any claims that the dub is public domain need to be backed up by reliable sources.AtomicMysteryMonster (talk) 23:19, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not public domain
Talk:Demand-side

message: "The most powerful tool is investment spending towards advertisment"  This seems pretty dubious.  It doesn't mesh with anything else I've been able to find online, although I've never studied this subject.
Here's a summary which is at least coherant:
http://www.ssc.uwo.ca/economics/faculty/jpalmer/Econway/chpt21.html
This page needs attention from someone informed about economics.  --Starwed 11:53, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Attention needed

message: This article has been found to be edited by students of the Wikipedia:India Education Program project as part of their (still ongoing) course-work. Unfortunately, many of the edits in this program so far have been identified as plain copy-jobs from books and online resources and therefore had to be reverted. See the India Education Program talk page for details. In order to maintain the WP standards and policies, let's all have a careful eye on this and other related articles to ensure that no material violating copyrights remains in here. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 12:36, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Look out for possible copyright violations in this article 

message: Perhaps flippantly in the face of some ... Wiki contortions (traced a bit here; and I'm still in process) (I like seeing the above reference to contributions from the subcontinent ...; that sort of kept up the tone), I'm working on this (new to me) phrase (on behalf of the man, I find, for whom the Fed's building, I find, is named). I think most or all the contortions as I've traced them are serious at bottom; and the efforts I'm making are certainly serious and, I hope, worthwhile. I'm not a specialist but hopefully am a somewhat-informed and definitely concerned and common-sensical what? person. Who hopefully knows how to work within the limits of his/r expertise. On we go. Swliv (talk) 19:01, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr. [[Marriner Stoddard Eccles|Eccles]]
Category talk:Adoption

message: There is an article on Open_adoption that should be included in this category, but I can't work out how to add it to the category article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bastun (talk • contribs) 06:54, 6 December 2005 
: It's been added since. --Saforrest (talk) 16:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

message: The adoption series of articles has become fragmented, losing natural inter-connectedness.  I am re-organizing so that the main categories include: Adoption Law, Adoption History, Adoption Organizations, Adoption Related People, and Adoption Related Works.  Each will have sub-categories.  For example: Adoption Related people will include: Adoptees, Adoptive Parents, etc.
Tobit2 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 01:16, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm about 1/3 of the way done so far, but already we are getting categories that are better populated and linked.  Moreover, I can now see how much is missing, e.g. the Orphan Trains.Tobit2 (talk) 04:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming project for adoption categories
Talk:Publication

message: who is a publisher?
;Publisher
:One who is engaged in publishing printed material.
Dictionary.com for the win. Vancar 20:27, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Let he who is without publication throw the first stone

message: Is this legal argument still relevant under current US copyright law? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DGG (talk • contribs) 22:35, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: external link

message: The intro to this article could be the intro to publishing. If you oppose the merger with publishing, please clarify what this article should be about, if not about publishing. Nurg (talk) 01:04, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article here is clearly not about "publishing" in general but about the meaning of the term "publication" in very specialized contexts. Merging this into the general article about publishing would be a mistake.  Lupo 20:54, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree,butthen we need a moredistinctive title.: "Publication in copyright law"? DGG (talk) 17:12, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: I started a new section stub on "types of publication" to organize a bunch of material found in various Wikipedia pages, which does not at present have a central "station". My goal with this section is to list and organize the basic categories of material support of publications (book, pamphlet, journal etc.) as well as the categories of content of publications - which give rise to names that are sometimes confused with material descriptors but which are really content descriptors, such as "brochure" or "tract". - Wwallacee (talk) 11:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Types of publication 
Talk:Nissan Fuga

message: This doesn't say what regions these models are avaiable in. I don't think they are avaialble in Britain
The Fuga is aviable on the japanesee market.
It will be available in Britain in 2009 when it is badged as Infiniti M.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TangoR34 (talk • contribs) 13:42, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Excuse me, but I believe that the brand Infiniti is only sold in America. It is the American division of Nissan. Up and over for a six! (talk) 09:02, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually you are partially right in that currentlly the Infiniti name is used in North America, but Nissan has plans to introduce Infiniti to Europe, to Include Russia, France, Germany and England.(Regushee (talk) 17:31, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

message: The new model was not introduced in 2009. The first generation ran from 2004-2010 (2006-2010 in the US), with 2011 seeing the new model, and designation in the US as the M37/etc.  This needs clarification.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.196.189.121 (talk) 13:21, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline is not correct.
Talk:It Ain't Me Babe

message: An infobox was requested for The Turtles' 1965 recording of "It Ain't Me Babe" at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Missing_encyclopedic_articles/List_of_notable_songs/7.
Um, isn't Dylan's song worth a mention here?
:Who was it that released this song as a single in 1963? 1964 Dylan album track, '65 Cash single, without June Carter.Lion King 00:48, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Did June Carter really sing on the original 1965 single? I can't hear her. She sang it with him on a re-recording, issued on "Johnny Cash Greatest Hits Vol.1", 1967, but surely not the single? Lion King 17:20, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Recording date is given as 8/27/1964. On the version you have, what, he's singing solo??? Wahkeenah 17:38, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, do you think it could be a rare copy or something? Cheers, Lion King 18:37, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Turtles infobox request

message: Chords played: G C G D G // G C G D G // Bm Am Bm Am// Bm Am Bm Am// C D // G C D G  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.3.204.103 (talk) 18:03, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chords 

message: I am having trouble tracking down this recording by the Byrds. Does anyone know which LP or EP it might have been on? Or was it a single release only?  Grandma Roses (talk) 19:39, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recorded by the Byrds? 

message: The article says Selena Gomez & Kygo covered the song in 2017. The lyrics and melody, however, are completely different, the only similarity is the "it ain't me" line. Any sources for this claim? I didn't find any. 62.245.87.103 (talk) 18:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really a notable cover, removed it and a couple of others. Probably more to go. --Richhoncho (talk) 19:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Transpires, it's another song altogether, It Ain't Me. --Richhoncho (talk) 11:11, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selena Gomez cover?
Talk:Diver Dan

message: ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 12:11, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Who played Diver Dan? (PeacePeace (talk) 04:56, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What actor played Diver Dan? The article does not say
Talk:Sturgis, Michigan

message: This article's AFD debate agreed to have the article be merged with this one and have it redirect here. I have done so, and also redirected the talk page here. Johnleemk | Talk 12:24, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Burr Oak Tool and Gauge]] redirects here

message: Anons have repeatedly inserted the text "It is said that Senator Hillary Clinton will walk the parade route this 2007 as she goes on a 1 week campain tour of Michigan.  Senator Clinton will have a samll town meeting for those who want to hear what she will do when she becomes President".  The claim neither has a verified source to substantiate the claim, nor was I able to find anything to support the claim by reviewing http://www.sturgisjournal.com (the local newspaper's website) or http://www.hillaryclinton.com/ (official Hillary Clinton campaign website).
Due to the unverifiable nature of the post, I suggest removing the claim until/unless WP:VERIFY can be satisfied. --161.88.255.139 21:45, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw that the "fact" tag had been removed without supplying a source, so I re-inserted the tag.  The specific weasel-words were removed, so I didn't re-insert that tag. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsupported claim in article

message: This town made national news for it's freak-out over someone posting [signs all over town].  --Bobak 00:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  All your base are belong to us
Talk:Andrew D. Hamilton

message: This article's AFD debate reached consensus to keep. Johnleemk | Talk 12:30, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed AFD

message: I believe the article's description of Andrew Hamilton's tenure at NYU feels unbalanced to me. The majority of the description is currently spent condemning his initial tenure as disastrous, owing to a decline in one source of university rankings. Beyond being a questionable benchmark in itself (especially when not compared to other rankings, see e.g. ARWU, which puts it on its 2011 level: http://www.shanghairanking.com/World-University-Rankings/New-York-University.html), I believe the section as it stands is far, far too harsh, particularly given the limited evidence and extremely limited influence over it during his eight-month tenure.   Dysase (talk) 18:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, and the sourcing is also poor.  I have deleted the final section. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 19:37, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias in NYU tenure section
Talk:Sinclair QDOS

message: I've removed this article from the "DOS" Category as Qdos is neither related to MS-DOS etc, nor is it a "DOS" in the generic sense, as in its standard form, it didn't support any kind of "disk" storage medium — Letdorf 12:40, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
Template talk:User en-AU

message: As an Australian I'd really prefer if this template used normal Australian English. Some colloquialisms are fine, but this template goes way too far. Midg3t 12:42, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it's a little twee. - Randwicked 12:53, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not supposed to be a serious Babel template, oddly enough. As an Australian, I like a semi-incomprehensible template - David Gerard 09:45, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

message: There was a redlink on the word "native", and I think it was a category, but I removed it anyways. Maybe it got deleted? Jonjonbt 21:59, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redlink
Talk:Diapir

message: OK - more to do. Need to separate the cold diapiric stuff from the hot diatremic stuff. Later - :-) Vsmith 12:53, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: True - separation is planned - I'm kind slow though :-). I see you have made a diatreme page - good, but it too needs a bit of a re-write. Ah well, someday ... Cheers, Vsmith 02:52, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What exactly *is* differential loading? It's a redlink, and I can't find anything relevant on a pretty thorough set of searches. 172.4.121.7 (talk) 01:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This paper is just one of many that I found using Google Scholar. It could do with properly citing and a bit more explanation, however, I'll see what I can come up with. Mikenorton (talk) 13:04, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differential loading?
Talk:Toronto-Dominion Bank

message: Nothing about the Stanford scandal?  It really needs (even a short) section.Mukogodo (talk) 13:31, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stanford 

message: The addition of the (Canada) disambiguater into the article title seems rather unnecessary (per WP:QUALIFIER). On top of the fact it would very much be the primary topic, there is also the fact that there isn't even another TD Bank Group to disambiguate from in the first place (to the point that TD Bank Group already redirects here.... this is just excessive redirections). 
I personally would have just already just moved the article to TD Bank Group, but opted to open up this discussion first for any editors that had concerns about the initial page move from Toronto-Dominion to TD Bank (I don't really have an opinion on that, though I do have one about what seems to be an unnecessary disambiguation in the current title). Leventio (talk) 16:29, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disc. on moved page title 

message: Charles Schwab Corporation is 9.7% owned by TD, which makes it a partial subsidiary. Please stop undoing my revisions! Babesonion (talk) 20:51, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: A subsidiary is a company whose parent company is a majority shareholder that owns more than 50% of all the subsidiary company's shares. Charles Schwab Corporation doesn't qualify as one, so please refrain from adding it back blindly. Ptrnext (talk) 04:40, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charles Schwab IS a partial subsidiary.
Talk:Smart antenna

message: I can only find one model of smart TV antenna on the market, the Sylvania DTA-5000.  How disappointing... are there truly no other models available?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.46.199.231 (talk) 20:06, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smart antennas for ATSC (digital television) broadcasts 

message: How does one change the Subject Title from "Smart antenna" to "Smart Antenna?" 67.235.95.28 (talk) 04:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Move tab at the top, BUT, please don't.  The current setup is appropriate by the Wikipedia standards. (John User:Jwy talk) 04:40, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subject Ttile 

message: It seems that most Smart Antennas are usually conventional antennas being matched by electronically controlled matching networks or fed through controllable phase shifters under software control. Wouldn't this make them a "Smart antenna systems"?  This may be splitting hairs, but if the "antenna" is the point of conversion from electrical energy to electromagnetic radiated energy doesn't it make the concept of a smart antenna seem a bit tedious.  
Then there are the Software defined antennas, an emerging class of smart antennas that are able to dynamically alter their physical structure to accomplish many of the effects of matching and beam steering at the point of conversion .  Still under software control, the SDA might consist of an array of patch elements and a feed structure that morphs to vary the phasing, thus causing beam steering. By changing the patch size or orientation (again under software control) different frequencies and polarizations are also possible.  Should their be a section added for SDAs?  Sgemeny (talk) 17:36, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Software Defined Antenna
Talk:Roger Protz

message: Roger was not one of the original four co-founders of Camra.  These were Michael Hardman, Graham Lees, and, if I remember rightly Christopher Hutt, but I can't think who the fourth was unless it was John Green - but I don't think it was.
Andysoh 23:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Founder
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Hotlist of History of Ideas

message: Hey, I've made these three redirects:
* Due process of law to Due process
* Free will in theology to Free will
* Relativism in ethics to Moral relativism (Ethical relativism also redirects there)
I then deleted the entries from the main list. If you don't agree with the redirects, or I'm not doing the right thing, please let me know! --The Famous Movie Director 13:47, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

message: There is an entry for "double truth theories" under "truth" in wikipedia. Does this really need a separate page? Anarchia 04:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: double truth