Talk:Prince Xavier of Bourbon-Parma

message: This title [ETA Prince Xavier of Parma; I moved it already] is absurd.  It should be either Prince Xavier of Bourbon-Parma or Xavier, Duke of Parma.  I don't see any justification for the current title.  john k (talk) 16:36, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't call it absurd, that's a little POV. It's not as common as their invented dynastic designation seems to be used more with the princely title but it is still correct. Seven Letters 19:12, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It might be technically correct, but it is absolutely never used.  Prince Xavier of Bourbon-Parma is preferable in every way to the alternative. john k (talk) 05:32, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

text: We use the highest titles for people that they had. The Dukes of Parma after Robert have been titled Duke of Parma... I don't think it matters if they were duke for 3 years or 30... Seven Letters 01:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree highest title should be used, in all the move discussions the consensus has been to use the ducal title. - dwc lr (talk) 01:10, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously this is our general policy.  I do think that we should consider making exceptions in extraordinary circumstances.  It is not like Xavier is comparable to someone like Edward VIII.  Edward VIII lived almost his entire life either before, or after, the brief period when he was "Edward VIII".  But that brief period was also the most important period of his life, about which the most has been written.  The same is true for the vast majority of monarchs who served only briefly.  The only real exception that comes to mind is Frederick III, German Emperor, who was dying of throat cancer for the whole of his 90 day reign and basically incapable of ruling.  But even Frederick was an actual reigning monarch.  Xavier was quite clearly notable almost entirely for things he did before he briefly succeeded his nephew as titular duke of Parma - for his abortive peace-making efforts with his brother during World War I, and for his Carlist activities in the 30s and 40s.  I think he is much more comparable to a peer than he is to a reigning monarch, and we do make such exceptions for peers.  Our articles are not at Robert Stewart, 2nd Marquess of Londonderry or Frederick North, 2nd Earl of Guilford or Harold Macmillan, 1st Earl of Stockton.  Why is Xavier's case any different from Lord Stockton's? john k (talk) 01:59, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Because he's the head of a dynasty and accordingly was duke of Parma. Seven Letters 06:41, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see how being head of an exiled dynasty claiming title to a long-defunct duchy is so different from being a British earl that it warrants such different treatment.  Why is the fact that Macmillan was only Earl of Stockton for the last couple of years of his life, long after his retirement, relevant to how we title that article, but the fact that Xavier was only Duke of Parma for the last couple of years of his life, long after his retirement (I believe he'd already given up his Spanish claims to Carlos Hugo by 1974), is not relevant?  It is exactly the same situation.  The "highest title" rule is based on the (usually correct) premise that the person's greatest significance derives from that title, or came during the time they held that title.  That is demonstrably untrue of Xavier, so he should be an exception, like British peers who acquire titles after retirement.  At any rate, propose a move if you like.  I will oppose. john k (talk) 14:16, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Prince Xavier of Bourbon-Parma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://geocities.com/montejurra1976/donjavier4marzo1977.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://geocities.com/montejurra1976/donamagdalena8marzo1977.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:36, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The succession box says that both pretenderships, of Spain (Carlist) and of Parma, are disputed between his two sons.  From their respective articles, that seems to be true of Spain (the elder son was deemed ideologically impure by at least some Carlists), but I don't see any mention of a dispute over Parma.  I think that entry should be split. —Tamfang (talk) 08:12, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  the Parma succession 

message: The article says that his number as a prisoner in Dachau concentration camp was 156270. It just so happens that I'm working on a project to analyze prisoner cards from Dachau and I came across his card — and its number is not 156270 but rather 101057, as you can see here: https://www.zooniverse.org/projects/cseidenstuecker/every-name-counts/talk/3232/1424141. 
Any ideas how to solve this discrepancy? (He moved between different camps, maybe 156270 was his number at one of those other camps and that book's author — or Xavier himself — got confused?)
By the way, this image may be freely used on Wikipedia/Wikimedia, we just have to credit the Arolsen Archives. Gazilion (talk) 17:28, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internment at Dachau