lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Alonso de Maldonado

message: As of now, the article claims that Alonso de Maldonado's full name is Alonso de Maldonado Diez de Ledesma, and cites "Juan Ponce de Leon His New and Revised Genealogy" -John J. Browne Ayes.
I don't think that the person stated in this book is the same as this Alonso de Maldonado. In all the other citations given in this article, his name appears only as Alonso de Maldonado. This is true in other sources that I have found that relate to this person. The information on his family given in the "Early Life" section also contradicts another source that relates Maldonado's life:
The article says that Maldonado was "the son of Francisco Arias Maldonado and Guiomar Diez de Ledesma". Whereas my source,  states that his parents were Juan Álvarez Maldonado and Catalina de Solís. This source also states that he was born in 1495, not 1480. It also states that he "possibly in 1542 lived maritally with Catalina de Montejo, but without marrying [her]..." whereas the article states "Alonso married as his first wife, Juana de Ortega" and "His second marriage was to Elena de Torres y Medinilla", none of which I've been able to find in other sources relating to Alonso de Maldonado.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AragonChristopherR17Z (talk • contribs) 01:05, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full Name
Talk:Early history of Minnesota Golden Gophers football

message: Should these coaches articles really just be redirects?  It's pretty standard on Wikipedia for coaches to have their own articles. matt91486 03:59, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, most coaches have their own articles, but in these early years of Gopher football, most of the coaches weren't around long and there isn't much information (at least in my sources) about them, so combining them all onto a single page and having redirects here makes a lot of sense.  If someone eventually wants to put more information about any of them into Wikipedia, I'd absolutely encourage them to create a new article in place of the redirect and then put a link to the new page on this one (much like the section on William Heffelfinger who already had an article before I created this page).  I might eventually do some of that on my own, but there is so much work to be done on other Gopher coaches (Henry L. Williams and Bernie Bierman in particular) that it will be a while before I'll revisit these early coaches.  Gopherguy | Talk 14:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coach redirects?
Category talk:Converts from Judaism

message: This should not be speedily deleted, as it is not the same as Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_April_19#Category:People_who_have_renounced_Judaism.  The most recent CFD for this was august 3 and resulted in no consensus (see above).  --Kbdank71 15:55, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: speedy?
Talk:Cathedral of San Agustin (Laredo, Texas)

message: Should the article name include the location to prevent confusion with the Cathedral Basilica of St. Augustine? Goldnpuppy (talk) 21:58, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Steve Pittman

message: No mention of it but he also played for Portadown FC in the Irish Premier League in Northern Ireland. Possibly on loan from a Scotish club but no details of appearances or year.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.114.44.200 (talk) 10:17, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portadown FC 
Talk:Euphemia li Britannia

message: Feel free to make this a better article. --Monstez 17:32, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In terms of tense, the article needs to be written in present tense.  While viewers are aware that she is dead, as long as events concerning her are described in relation to the story, it must be described in present tense unless the event occurred before the story happened.  When we watch her in the story, she is doing the action at that moment; though we may have finished watching her (thus making it past tense for the audience), each time we watch it, the events that occur happen in the present, not the past.  24.84.200.124 01:56, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation of article

message: should we add a picture of her when she ordered the death of the japanese and on her deathbed?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Estarrol (talk • contribs) 23:06, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: I would say that "Massacre Princess" is more of an nickname than an alias, especially since she's only referred to by that name after her death. -71.61.93.137 (talk) 03:04, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Aliases
Talk:Christianity and fringed garments

message: Does Wikipedia need this article? Its content could effectively be merged into a Christianity section within the Tallit article. - BobKilcoyne (talk) 19:33, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Adventures of Sir Galahad

message: DVD cover, IMDB, many sales sources give The Adventures of Sir Galahad. Serial credits gives Adventures of Sir Galahad. MartinSFSA (talk) 10:07, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''The'' Adventures of Sir Galahad 
Category talk:Messianic Judaism

message: Hey there I added :Category:Jewish denominations to this category page so this category would be less POV in terms of what religion it falls under. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) 20:09, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Opinions? --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) 20:10, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category
Talk:South Plantation High School

message: Congratulations to both Bobby Baglia and Wayne Federman.  You both make fellow alumni proud.
Bobby, the class of 77, along with the old brown piece of you know what remember you fondly.
Here is the template for the infobox Template:Infobox_high_school, feel free to complete it. Trougnouf 15:32, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Head East

message: I've moved the trivia items into the body of the article, but I'm not convinced I've placed these items in the most appropriate spot -- if someone feels strongly about moving them, go right ahead. Accounting4Taste 17:50, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Eliminated trivia

message: The list of members and past members on the sidebar doesn't come close to matching the list in the main body of the article.  Zaxius (talk) 17:34, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Current/former members

message: Comments concerning former Head East roadie Baxter Forrest Twilight are slanderous and libellous and need to be removed. Even though there is a reference to an interview by Steve Huston where he indeed made these comments, the comments are an embellishment of the truth. The FBI was never looking for Baxter and statements that he took acid are unproven. This misinformation is being re-posted in many places on the web as if it were true and is having a detrimental effect on the current line-up of the band. Please correct this asap. Headeastweb (talk) 22:31, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Background contains potentially libellous statements
Talk:Somapura Mahavihara

message: The same place has articles under Sanskrit & Pali names. I suggest the Sanskrit name be used, based on a higher google hit count. Sylvain1972 19:21, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree. This is a UNESCO World Heritage site and the name used by UESCO should be the primary name while other names can be redirected to that page.-Arman Aziz 04:57, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not appropriate to remove a merge tag unilaterally. I've restored it. Second, UNESCO used the Sanskrit "Somapura" on their websites: , .Sylvain1972 13:32, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Furthermore, "Somapura Mahavira" is the title used by Encyclopædia Britannica. Sylvain1972 13:56, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Is there anything significant about Paharpur other than Somapura? If so, I would suggest keeping the Paharpur article separate and merging the rest under "Somapura Mahavira," following the Encyclopædia Britannica convention. If not, I would suggest that we use "Somapura Vihara at Paharpur." Sylvain1972 15:52, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just merged all the articles involved (Somapura, Paharpur and Sompur Bihara) into this article, including the talk page. All the previous articles are now redirected to this page. Any quick google search or a peek into the Banglapedia (the national encyclopedia of Bangladesh) will tell that this is the correct title for the archaeological site. Cheers. Aditya(talk • contribs) 17:53, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Somapura Mahavihara is probably the best choice. Arman Aziz 02:41, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I propose switching to the Common Era (BCE/CE) notation for all era dates as is conventional for all other Indic/Hindu/Buddhist-related articles. Getsnoopy (talk) 18:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Switch to Common Era notation 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Aerial view of Somapura Mahavihara.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for March 26, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-03-26. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! --Ahecht (TALKPAGE) 20:20, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD 

message: * Doi:10.53808/kus.1999.1.2.187-204-se
Nizil (talk) 07:10, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Ralph A. Ofstie

message: I created this article from a link located on Joy Bright Hancock.  As such I was unable to remove his middle initial ("A") from the article.  Does anyone know how to do this?  It will make it much easier to find the article if only the first and last name is used.  Bosamar 17:55, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want to move the article, just click on the "move" tab at the top of the page (the article, not this page) and follow the instructions there. Regards. PC78 19:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ralph A. Ofstie

message: He's pictured wearing pilot wings (single vertical anchor).
The term Naval Flight Officer (according to that WP page) didn't take on its present meaning until 1966.
Even if a pre-1966 source used the term Naval Flight Officer, I believe "Naval Aviator" would be better given the modern meaning of Naval Flight Officer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.76.96.146 (talk) 20:50, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  not a Naval Flight Officer
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Narnia/Sandbox/Minor characters in The Chronicles of Narnia

message: The plot summary in this section contains a significant amount of info from the movies. Shouldn't that be noted as such somehow, if it's included at all? (My preference would be to stick to the book and leave out the movie, but I don't know the usual practice on that.) - Erusse estelinya 18:00, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is the section of the original in question. If it ought to go back in, please do (but with some explanation to distinguish it as from the movie please): "When they arrive, the Beavers and the remaining Pevensies escape via an underground tunnel and begin their journey to Aslan's How. While traveling, they once more encounter the secret police on the Frozen River, but manage to escape them at the melting of the ice." - Erusse estelinya 18:11, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, you're right, the book version is the version that should stay. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 18:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mr. and Mrs. Beaver

message: Can someone help me out with the infobox here? The links to the books that he is a major character in aren't quite right. (It should be 2 separate links, not 1 big link)--Leamarie411x2 22:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr.Tumnus 

message: Do you really consider Uncle Andrew a "minor" character? He's one of the main antagonists of "The Magician's Nephew". IIRC (I don't have the book in front of me) he qualifies in one sense as the magician's nephew in the title - in that HIS uncle was an actual practicing sorcerer (like I said, I could be misremembering, but I seem to remember being struck by that interesting ambiguity once as I read through that book). At any rate, while he's not a character that spans the series, he's a major character in that book, and thus not a minor character...Applejuicefool (talk) 18:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncle Andrew? 

message: Emeth and Lasaraleen are minor characters, but I noticed that they also have their own pages. (Unfortunately, I discovered this after working hard to expand their sections! Ugh...) So, should they be removed from this page? I looked at their pages, and the information is more or less the same as what is here. Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 07:00, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emeth & Lasaraleen
Talk:Xindian River

message: Xindian Creek? Isn't it somewhat bigger than a creek? Rolf-Peter Wille (talk) 09:08, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You're absolutely right, the "Xindian River" cannot count as a "creek".--Liji6085 (talk) 11:10, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Talk:HMS Drake (1901)

message: Bitte die Verlinkung zu U-79 prüfen. U-79 wurde erst 1941 gebaut. --84.134.101.172 18:05, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Which book by Friedman is meant here, the 2011 one or the 2012 one?Nigel Ish (talk) 10:53, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Friedman p247?
File talk:Qxz-ad70.gif

message: The ad says "a large chunk of whats missing"- that should be "a large chunk of what's missing". J Milburn 18:06, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Missed apostrophe

message: The advertisement text starts with the following:
:"Some of the greatest places in the world..."
It seems to me that this isn't in keeping with the spirit of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Is this required for such an image? It connotes an improper attitude. 86.134.25.176 13:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also dislike this's ad's attitude and use of assumptive language. It's one thing to feel passionately about something, another to get accusatory towards everyone who views the ad because the articles that you prefer so much aren't what you want them to be. Phasmatisnox 08:25, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV?
Talk:Chosen People Ministries

message: This is a propaganda piece. It has been tagged with NPOV problems before, but clearly this still needs to be addressed. 
--98.232.207.138 (talk) 10:24, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: They don't just believe Jesus is the Messiah. They believe he is God.— 67.85.254.111 (talk) 21:16, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Interstate 15 in Montana

message: Needs county and location. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 22:55, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed it. Artisol2345 03:37, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Exit list

message: River crossings...
You ought to explain where (by milepost) there are any crossings of major rivers, such as the Missouri River.47.215.183.159 (talk) 11:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  River crossings...
Talk:Dryopteris arguta

message: Handbook of Northwestern Plants by Helen M Gilkey and La Rea J Dennis, Revised edition 2001, mentioned this fern. Page 25.
"Coastal wood fern. Rhizomes stout, covered by bright chestnut-colored scales; stipes shorter than the blades; leaves to 10 dm. tall, blades herbaceous to slightly leathery, pinnate-pinnatifid to 2-pinnate at the base, lance-ovate to deltoid-lanceolate in outline, acuminate, pinnae sessile, pinnules oblong, the margins doubly serrate to incised; sori large, orbicular; indusia persistent. Rocky outcrops and woods." Permalearning (talk) 02:44, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference and description
Talk:Jägermonsters

message: I hope I've fixed the concern with the article's context; my apologies for not writing that in in the first place. Really, I don't know how I missed that. Octane [improve me]  09.08.07 1814 (UTC)
I think there is alot to be written about the Jagers... Like their possible connection with the real-life Jagers, their link to the heterodynes, how they do not allow themselves to get medical attention by anyone who's not a heterodyne. I think there's plenty to be said.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gilthans (talk) 07:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested speedy
Talk:List of mountain peaks of Alaska

message: The primary criterion for inclusion in this article is that a peak must have at least  of topographic prominence.  Many of the peaks in the National Park Service publication Highest Alaskan Summits do not meet this criterion.  Please see peakbagger.com for the prominence of these peaks.  There are many wonderful peaks with less prominence, but this article uses this high prominence criterion.  --Buaidh (talk) 16:54, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it does look like a lot of these peaks should be included in the list.  However, I can't find any source that lists the highest Alaskan peaks using the criteria here (or a broader criteria so that we can extract what we want from them) that claims to be complete.  (Neither peakbagger.com nor bivouac.com make any claim to have a complete list, for example.  And cohp.org which often has such things appears not to have one for Alaska.)  Given how inadequate the current list is, we really need a proper source for this rather than to just add mountains that immediately spring to mind.  —ras52 (talk) 10:50, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Topographic Prominence

message: Is there any peak called like this in Alask? Because when you click on Moby Dick you go directly to the novel.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.45.199.190 (talk) 03:23, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Moby Dick
Talk:Formication

message: I think it is demodex.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:214C:8031:4200:F183:D34E:A8F3:B844 (talk) 20:13, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a doctor

message: Just wanted to point out that the talk page is for suggestions about how to improve this encyclopedia article. It is not meant for discussions about the topic in general. Thanks, Invertzoo (talk) 00:45, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed with above, though if we can cite the ice thing, that would actually be useful. I'm pretty sure there's no way we'll get a cite for 'embrace the sensation' though. 143.92.1.32 (talk) 00:32, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Function of the talk page

message: I have experienced debilitating itching in response to withdrawal to both antidepressants and antihistamines. I don't want to add this to the article without references. Is there anyone with access to reputable journals who can verify and add this, please?
--Peter Riches (talk) 03:25, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion for further literature search 
Talk:Art Workers' Coalition

message: Someone needs to add the Guernica protest, and the Schapiro letter, current exhibitions, and some more references.  Probably could be rewritten, also.  KP Botany 18:25, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guernica, My Lai 

message: I strongly suspect this article was either roughly translated from some other language, or written by an editor with a rough grasp of English. The phrase and tone seem unsuited to English-language text. (I'm a union man and Quaker peacenik; I know "over-the-top protestese" when I read [or write] it - this isn't it.) --Orange Mike 20:37, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the insult.  I'm not sure what's going on here, but there seems to be some concentrated effort to insult the editor(s) of this article, and to remove it from Wikipedia.  I would now like to request an assumption of good faith, and an explanation for what precisely is going on.  I do not have a "rough grasp of English" and I don't appreciate your comments.  KP Botany 20:55, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Repeated sincere apologies and proffers of :WP:AGF extended - I came here in the first place to see why the article had been attacked, and agree that it has a meaningful place here. --Orange Mike 21:06, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation?

message: Can somebody check source documents and find out whether these are the correct titles? "What Should Be the Program of The Art Workers Regarding Museum Reform, and to Establish the Program of the Art Workers' Coalition" and "Moratorium of Art to End the War in Vietnam" both sound a little clunky, and I'm wondering whether these were the actual titles of the hearing and of the Moratorium event? --Orange Mike 21:22, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The original names are really chunky, but I was unhappy with the specific source, except for one book, that I did not quote. I don't have time to search now, but these titles do need to be attached to a specific reference.  KP Botany 04:11, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further work is needed 

message: - 1st para? Possible in those days I suppose.  Johnbod 02:49, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "free pubic access" 

message: In researching Alan Vega one finds that he was involved with the AWC, and that it gave rise to the establishment of the MUSEUM: Project of Living Arts, an alternative 24hr art space at Broadway & Waverly with a grant from the New York State Council on the Arts, which is where Vega did his early light sculptures. This gallery probably deserves an article of its own. If any further info should show up I'd be happy to see it. Wwwhatsup (talk) 07:36, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: MUSEUM: Project of Living Artists

message: If you're editing this page, you might consider using the material in
*
especially around p. 225.--Carwil (talk) 01:45, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  An additional source
Talk:HPTi

message: HPTi was acquired in June, 2010 by Dynamics Research Corporation.  Should this page remain as a historical record of the firm's independent existence? Happypete (talk) 14:10, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standards for Acquired companies 
Talk:Dajia River

message: This should be "Daja river", not "Dajia river". And it doesn't mean "big shell river". It's just a name. You can break apart the components of the name to get "big shell river", but that's not how it's spoken or understood in Chinese.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zbzzn (talk • contribs) 01:35, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Těrlicko

message: I copyedited the article, but I have a few questions:
# Is Těrlicko in Zaolzie?
# Why does it say "Żwirkowisko" in parentheses?
# What is "MK"?
# Shouldn't "Kościelec" be "Kostelec"?
# When you say "141 houses", you can't included non-houses. Were there 141 houses plus the other buildings, or were there 141 buildings of all types?
# Are you sure you spelled "Grodziszcz" correctly? (joke) --Milkbreath 18:32, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Stonávka River was dammed. Kostelec was already a part of Těrlicko. - Darwinek 20:12, 9 August 2007 (UTC)