lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Requests for bureaucratship/Durin

message: Durin's edit stats using "wannabe Kate" tool as of 17:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

message: There appears to be an unresolved personal attack issue on this site, mainly this edit where User:Gmaxwell calls another user (Husnock) a troll and says that user deserves little respect and is dangerous to the project.  In line with WP:NPA, this should be removed.  The motivation for GMaxwell's comments appear to be quite complex, as there is a history between him and the other user going back over a year.  I investigated the matter and found this entry where GMaxwell apparently vandalized a large number of pages, starting with Husnock's, and was spoken to by the community. GMaxwell's comment should be stricken from the record of this case.  If I was able to find using a simply web search, I am certain other users more emotional about the affair could find it as well.  Better to strike or retract.  Thank you. -195.229.242.84 05:35, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoever you may be, closed discussions don't get edited. Majorly (o rly?) 12:40, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal attack on this page
Talk:Politics of Senegal

message: In the main Senegal article, it says that it used to be 7 years but was ammended to 5 years in 2001.
Yeah, I´m on a project that researches the abilities of african constitutions based on their legislative funtions. Im going through the Senegalese constitution now and see no mention of parallel voting systems. In fact i find it clearly stated in Article 60 of their constitution that they have direct elections. This article say something commmmpleeeetelllyyyy wrong. However, I know if i fix this someone will call me a vandal and say I dont have sources. So instead ill just leave it up on the talk page until an admin comes around, sees what I wrote, verifies article 60 in the constitution and replaces the dubious claim of mixed polling. 
- Tony  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.19.137.225 (talk) 06:37, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Group of 22

message: JesseRafe 17:59, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: and Russia isnt blue. And some Canadian/American islands isnt blue. Bad map, oddly enough. --85.141.133.93 (talk) 13:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  China is not greened on this map 

message: This group seems to have been very short-lived, and there are many other "group 22" in History... Knewdates (talk) 06:07, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  No sign of existence
Talk:Chaumont, New York

message: Perhaps worth noting in this article is the pronunciation of the name.  Unlike Chaumont, France, it has been anglicized, and residents of the village and area pronounce it shuh-MOE, the "uh" being a "schwa" sound, the "-nt" being silent rather than the nasal that ends the French city.
Like many other Jefferson County names, it derives from early landholder James de le Ray de Chaumont.  (Source not readily available online but can be confirmed with Jefferson County Historical Society.)172.162.46.54 18:01, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Panathenaic Stadium

message: Maybe some photograph from the time of excavation exists?Revery (talk) 10:10, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excavations 

message: The gate is visible in the background. There is no gate in the other pictures, and IIRC it was constructed later. Qwazix (talk) 15:36, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The picture of the opening ceremony is probably wrong 
Talk:Baron Grey of Codnor

message: The text indicates the barony's creation in 1299 whilst the genealogical chart indicates 1397.  This needs explanation or revision.  Tmangray 18:02, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction of dates

message: What is the source for the coat of arms?  All other sources show a different one with the motto "anchor fast anchor". Tmangray 18:09, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coat of Arms

message: What were Proteus's sources for the following statement?
The Barony, though simply "Grey", is often termed "Grey of Codnor" or "Grey (of Codnor)" to distinguish it from the other Grey Baronies throughout history and from the extant Earldom of Grey, though it should be noted that the holder is always styled simply The Right Honourable Lord Grey
Proteus has often argued forcibly, notably here , that the London Gazette is the only available source that can be relied upon to get territorial designations right. It gives the title as 'Baron Grey of Codnor', as can be seen here . Should the Grey article therefore be amended? Flozu 16:05, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Barony, though technically simply Grey  as it was created by writ, is often termed "Grey of Codnor" or "Grey (of Codnor)" to distinguish it from the other Grey Baronies throughout history and from the extant Earldom of Grey; though it should be noted that the holder is always by convention styled simply as 'The Right Honourable Lord Grey.  Flozu 08:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: P.S. I'll copy this string to the Grey of Codnor page in the hope that it may elicit some answers. 09:02, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I'd agree with the above with a qualified caveat. That the writ of summons must be that of the 'exant' barony or the very act of the issue of the writ and its presentation and by sitting, were it worded other that of the 'accepted baronial title', would have created a new peerage by writ. Alci12 14:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "of Codnor"
Talk:Shane Gallagher

message: Shane does not play rhythm guitar for +44.  Shane and Craig split guitar parts evenly, as stated in a +44 video podcast.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.224.74.187 (talk) 00:12, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does this meet guidlines for notability? Fob183 (talk) 14:13, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:State Fair of West Virginia

message: Most of this article is still uncited...frankly, several of the statements just don't ring true. It would be nice to have more history of the Lewisburg Fair prior to designation as the state fair, and also the circumstances that led to that designation.  How many acres is the fairgrounds?  The parking and camping area?  Who owns it?  
Also, the fair receives a great deal of local criticism because it does not publish its financial statements, and questions are raised about its true "nonprofit" status.  However, I don't have any citations available to let me include his. Does anyone?  Cmichael 18:09, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Found, used and cited the proof of 501(c)3 status.  Still, there are rumors that funds are not all channelled back into operations.  I have no citations or proof of that of any kind, so won't include it.  Does anybody have anything along these lines?  Cmichael 04:20, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations and Improvements Needed
Talk:UCSI University

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:30, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: And again. -- John of Reading (talk) 07:53, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... I am updating the content of the page --Ucsiuniversity (talk) 07:58, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.ucsiuniversity.edu.my/about-us/the-university?display=tu. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  -- Asartea Talk | Contribs 12:17, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Mixed team at the 1896 Summer Olympics

message: Edwin Flack represented Australia according to the IOC.  The flag next to his name needs to change. 210.49.48.14 (talk) 06:36, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Australia was still under the British flag at the time. This article correctly identifies him as Australian already. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 13:39, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Australia did not exist as a political entity in 1896 - he would surely have been originally listed as from Victoria. Grutness...wha? 09:21, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Edwin Flack
Talk:United States at the 1896 Summer Olympics

message: Why are the top winners listed as gold medal winners?  There was no gold in 1896, only silver and copper, and no recognition for third place.  Shouldn't this be fixed? GBC (talk) 13:50, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The IOC has retroactively declared the top three placers at early Olympics to be gold, silver, and bronze medal winners. This is discussed on the 1896 Summer Olympics article; perhaps a note to that effect would be helpful on the nation articles as well. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 00:59, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Gold in 1896 

message: Is there any truth to the plot theme in "The First Olympics" TV mini-series that the Americans nearly were too late to compete at the Olympics?
According to the miniseries, when the American team's organizer went to the travel agency to book the athletes' trip to Athens, the travel agent read the dates on the poster, Apr 6-15, and converted them by adding 12 days - Apr 18-27 - and had the American Athletes arrive on April 14 or 15, three to four days before the starting date.
After the athletes departed, the American organizer and his wife had dinner with the Greek ambassador, who wondered why the effort was being made to send the athletes just to compete on the final day. In the ensuing discussion, "Mrs. Organizer" stated that the travel agent detected the "necessity" of making the adjustment from the poster, which he thought had Julian Calendar dates, to Gregorian Calendar dates. The Greek ambassador stated that the dates on the poster were the Gregorian dates - the Julian dates were March 25 to April 3.  
Consequently, the American organizer had to rebook the travel to rush the athletes through, and telegraph them at the location they'd be coming ashore from their sea crossing. The athletes are depicted in the miniseries as arriving at the venue during the opening ceremonies. GBC (talk) 13:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nearly late for the games? 

message: who won first gold for usa in 1896 summer olympic. Monjurul Islam Hassan (talk) 18:43, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  olympic
Talk:1993–94 Calgary Flames season

message: I've no source for this, but my memory tells me the 'A's are Al MacInnis & Joel Otto. GoodDay 18:26, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly.  MacInnis sounds right, but I don't remember, so chose not to include it. Resolute 19:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternate captains
Talk:Agony (The Tossers album)

message: I'm not sure this merits mentioning in the article, but some copies of this album had the track titles for "Claddagh" and "Leopardstown Races" reversed. The listing as we have it is correct. --BDD (talk) 22:27, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track order 
Talk:Swimming at the 1896 Summer Olympics – Men's 1200 metre freestyle

message: IOC modified data at Olympics.com after accepting the recommendation of Olympic historian Bill Mallon and transfer of information from Olympedia.org (the Olympic historians association website) to Olympics.com (the IOC website).
:*Swimming. Men's 1200m freestyle event. The IOC no longer recognized bronze medal of Efstathios Chorafas of Greece.
Jeff in CA (talk) 08:53, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision of IOC 1896 Olympics medal table that was made in July 2021
Talk:Love Inc. (group)

message: Where are all the sources at??   --142.167.133.188 (talk) 20:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Athletics at the 2004 Summer Olympics – Men's 4 × 400 metres relay

message: The time of 2:54.20 min, achieved at July 22nd 1998, was canceled due to the doping confession of team member Antonio Pettigrew (see here). The former world record of 2:54,29 min, achieved by the US-Team (Andrew Valmon, Quincy Watts, Harry Reynolds and Michael Johnson) at August 22nd 1993 in Stuttgart, Germany, was reinstated.--OlympicLegends (talk) 18:12, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Record
Talk:Shooting at the 1896 Summer Olympics – Men's 25 metre rapid fire pistol

message: "Rapid-fire muzzle-loading" pistol seems like an oxymoron. Was there a time-limit on finishing each of the five strings? Jeff in CA (talk) 04:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Rapid-fire muzzle-loading" pistol seems like an oxymoron
Talk:Shooting at the 1896 Summer Olympics – Men's 300 metre free rifle

message: It seems that the title of this article is wrong. According to the Olympic Games' official website, it should be something like "Shooting at the 1896 Summer Olympics – Men's 300 metre military rifle". Should I consider to move this page to this title? --Pymouss Let's talk 21:22, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: , je n'ai pas retrouvé le magazine en français, mais le numéro en anglais d'août 1991 de Revue olympique (publication du C.I.O.) indique "Thus the programme comprised 300m Rifle, 200m Army Rifle, 25 m Duelling Pistol, 30m Target Pistol and 25m Army Pistol." et pour l'épreuve 300m Rifle, ils précisent "No information on the weapons used was given." Le rapport officiel que cela soit en anglais ou en français ne précisent pour aucune des deux épreuves à la carabine que c'est sur arme militaire alors que pour les épreuves au pistolet, le rapport français précise révolver d'ordonnance à 25m (d'ordonnance = militaire). La base de l'ISOH a retenu free rifle (carabine sans spécificité particulière) et three positions (trois positions : couché, à genou, debout), ce qui, pour les trois positions, me parait douteux vu que la compétition se décomposait en 1896 en 4 séries de 10 tirs, c'est peut-être pour assurer une continuité du palmarès avec les épreuves des Jeux suivants. GabrieL (talk) 14:33, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error on description
Talk:100plus

message: Because I've just created this article, it is therefore orphaned. However, I really don't know what could link to this page, but nonetheless it is a useful article. I'll upload an image in a minute. JameiLei 18:30, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New Page
Talk:Occupation of Araucanía

message: The introductory paragraph of this short article concludes:  "Pacification of the Araucanía was the name given by Chilean authorities to hide the military aspect of the incorporation."  The assertion is dubious ("pacification" connotes military operations to native English-speakers, and this article is in English) and is not neutral in POV ("hide" connotes underhandedness, deviousness; "obscure" might be less contentious).  May not this sentence be rewritten to, at the least, "Pacification of the Araucanía was the name given by Chilean authorities"?  If not, should not the original author adduce some evidence that "pacification" was applied to the long campaign in a conscious attempt to obscure the martial aspects of the operation?  Firstorm 01:26, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Netlink

message: I'm interested in getting the Netlink documentation up to date. As anyone who writes Netlink code knows, the documentation is sparse. My limitations is that I work for an operating system company, so looking at Linux kernel source is not an option. Would any other Netlink developers be able to contribute here? ThomasCantrell 18:31, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnamed section 
Talk:Athletics at the 2004 Summer Olympics – Men's 5000 metres

message: Not unlike the 1952 Helsinki schedule that gave Zatopek three days to recover after the 5000, we have here an anomalous schedule that allowed El Guerrouj to double the 1500 and 5000 with finals 4 days apart.  In prior recent Olympiads the 1500 and 5000 were held on the same day or perhaps a day apart, both as showcase climax events with only the (men's) marathon waiting as the finale, again on the same day or only a day after greatly limiting the potential to repeat Zatopek's feat of 1952.  Can anyone supply some information as to how the unusual schedule of 2004 came to be?  Was it arranged specifically to accommodate El Guerrouj?   
(Nurmi accomplished his double in 1924 on the same day with only a 45 minute break between finals!  There are few comparable achievements, for example, HS star Rich Kimball winning the 2 mile around 8:46 (when the HS record was 8:41) and the mile within 80 minutes at the 1974 California State meet, or Prefontaine's one day 3 mile/mile double.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jszigeti (talk • contribs) 11:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 2004 track schedule
Talk:Athletics at the 2004 Summer Olympics – Men's discus throw

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB 17:44, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:John Beasley (musician)

message: For some reason, Sing Your Face Off redirects here. This was an announced ABC series that Beasley and others were supposed to appear on in 2013. I can find no indication such a series was ever broadcast. Since the title redirects here, there needs to be current information provided as to whether production of the show ever went ahead. I have attempted via Google to find any indication that the show ever went ahead, but cannot find any sources to suggest it did. Not even TV schedule websites. Plus any TV show that airs in the US inevitably gets a Wikipedia article made, so the fact one hasn't suggests the show might have become vaporware. 68.146.70.124 (talk) 15:08, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if that's okay, but I've added the "music director, TV shows" section which explains (also) the redirect.--Max Peltuinum (talk) 19:50, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Sing Your Face Off

message: I think that with the corrections and additions I have made the removal notice can be cleared, even if the page is not yet fully compliant with Wikipedia standards.--Max Peltuinum (talk) 18:25, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrections and removal notice
Talk:Athletics at the 2004 Summer Olympics – Men's pole vault

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB 21:36, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:All Because of You (Lisa Whelchel album)

message: This is a start for the infobox.
Release date: Summer 1984 
Producers: Bobby Cotton, John Rosasco
 
Genre: CCM
Album length (min:s): approx. 44. min.  
Record label:   Nissi Records (distributed by Sparrow 
 
I will look up the rest at Christian Music Archive sometime tonight.
WAVY 10 16:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added producers.
WAVY 10 22:57, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When you add stuff to the infobox fields, don't remove the "=" otherwise the box will not display properly. See :Template:Infobox album for further information. Bubba hotep 12:32, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the tip.  WAVY 10 13:29, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox info (partial, will add some tonight)
Talk:Pink Mountaintops

message: As an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I am not posting the link to this review of Pink Mountaintops' Outside Love. However, I would like to recommend it on its merits, and hope that an editor will find the time to examine the review and—if he or she sees fit—post it to the external links section, or, if an Outside Love page is created, to the professional reviews section on that page. I appreciate your time. Crawdaddy! (favorable) Mike harkin (talk) 01:20, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't get this URL to load (connection reset), and the Wayback machine didn't have anything either.—Anne Delong (talk) 00:24, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link / professional review suggestion