Talk:Caboose (Red vs. Blue)

message: The astute Wikipedian will note that, in my recent condensation of the plot, I left out season 4 entirely for the moment. The reason for this is that Caboose's role in season 4 is pretty minor, since the focus shifts to Simmons' exile, Tucker, and the Alien. If someone wants to add bits back in, feel free, but don't make it too long. I just felt that it was getting out of hand. I'll work on the Themes section eventually, but at least there's not as much redundancy now. — TKD::Talk 07:53, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 4 plot 

message: the spontaneous ejection of A.I. can be catastrophic the the psyche —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.61.65.64 (talk • contribs) 
:Yes, that's already mentioned in Sarge's quote about O'Malley taking the furniture when he left. — TKD::Talk 22:04, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A.I. 

message: I just removed the following from the article on Joel Heyman, as the article should be about the person and not redundant info on the characters he voices. Here it is in case there is useful content.--Drat (Talk) 03:46, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text dump 

message: I believe that an image of his back is not that good of a picture for showing how he looks in the future. --Rabin 21:26, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That was taken from the Season Four profile.  While I agree that it isn't helpful, it's more than likely that it will stay like that until someone can be bothered taking a picture of him in an episode in that setting.  Dac 06:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halo 2 Pic 

message: I beleive that we really don't need the OR tag in the intelligence section anymore, because for the sise of that section we have 3 inline citations, and a few other refrences so i'm pretty sure that's sufficient.  We would have to keep a watch on it to make sure OR isn't added to it, but for now i think it's fine.  Any thoughts????
peace_Threewaysround 19:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I don't see the need for that any more —The preceding unsigned comment was added by CapDac (talk • contribs) 21:41, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Well, theoretically, everything that requires nontrivial interpretation should be sourced. As it is, there's some analysis that isn't — the entire "Relationship with other characters" section, for example; as well as the last paragraph of the "Intelligence" section: Who described the interruptions as a running gag? We can verifiably say that these interruptions occur, but to call them a running gag is to add additional non-trivial analysis. — TKD::Talk 04:03, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  OR tag 

message: :Image:Rvbcaboosehalo1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Rvbcaboosehalo1.jpg

message: :Image:Rvbcaboosehalo2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Rvbcaboosehalo2.jpg

message: should we/someone add some?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.229.35.146 (talk) 07:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  Trivial info, not relevant.  Dac (talk) 08:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  quotes?