Talk:Harlequin-type ichthyosis

message: (Please, I attentively ask by own experience: Never search for images on this disease, unless you are prepared to see something very strong, do not do it if you are underage).
I doubt Wikipedia's purpose is to advise.. This seemed unnecessary so I deleted it.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Constellus (talk • contribs) 01:01, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Last paragraph on 'History' section

message: I think it would be educational and worthwhile to mention the way the disease is passed genetically (aka. if it is autosomal dominant, recessive, etc.). I personally am interested in this information and feel that many others are probably curious as well. 70.72.84.188 (talk) 02:51, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Genetics

message: This article states that the oldest living person with the disease was born circa 1984, yet states afterwards that there is an adult man born circa 1980 who still thrives.  Can we change to say the man born in 1980 is oldest, or is he dead?  Would like some sort of conformation.--Helgado (talk) 22:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to challenge and remove the fact if it has no citation. kilbad (talk) 23:05, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Oldest living case?

message: I'd just like to point out that some witty and adorable funster has put the words Many people enjoy making love to harlequin children at the end of this article, under references. 
Am I going to delete it? Nah. There are so many uptight editors around here that I'm sure one of them will notice and get round to it before long ... (cough, cough) Garrick92 14:47, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: I knew someone would do it once they had it drawn to their attention. If more people were fact- and sense-checking, and fewer people were acting as though the sanity of the world depended on their personal intervention in the creation of an article, the quality of this site would pick up dramatically. Straining at gnats and swallowing camels, etc. 
Garrick92 17:24, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, go ahead. Personally I think the description "armored plating" may be nothing but a clumsy choice of words rather than vandalism per se, but "plated skin" is certainly more correct and to the point in any case. Jonas Liljeström 15:25, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: There it was, gone

message: I have tagged this article with the  template, because I can't understand it, especially the first paragraph. Could someone help make this more clearer? --AAA! (AAAA) 02:56, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you suggest something for the opening paragraph to make it less confusing? EuroTeck 22:49, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing

message: Apart from the word 'disease' (which may suggest something contagious perhaps?) I find nothing confusing about the opening paragraph. It is an accurate description of a medical condition using appropriate and unambiguous terms. Perhaps such usage of medical terminology and assorted other big words in an article describing a medical condition is confusing? Perhaps it should be re-written to accommodate those with an interest in congenital birth defects who yet have no grasp of the correct terms and find that their interest does not extend to looking said terms up. In other words, I suggest leave it, its fine and there are plenty of other sites making it "more clearer."  Plutonium27 16:03, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Removing the tag. Jumping  cheese 11:05, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing Template?! 

message: The part of the article that reads, "On Thursday, April ye 5, 1750..." should read, "On Thursday, April þe 5, 1750..." The thorn character was used as a 'th,' so this sentence fragment is the equivalent of "On Thursday, April the 5, 1750..." The thorn was often written similarly to a 'y' and in printing a 'y' was used due to the the thorn being unavailable on printing machines. I tried to change it, but it won't let me, probably because 'þe' registers as a spelling mistake. Could someone please fix this?
Holymolytree2
:. - Zeibura Talk 08:15, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why the hell has some retard deleted the 'þe' from the quote? Where the hell do these people get off making 'corrections' to a frigging quote? The user who made the change, 76.206.221.150, is obviously an idiot and should be banned from making changes. Being unaware of a particular symbol or character isn't licence to decide that it's an error and then delete it. Holymolytree2 (talk) 11:40, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of the Thorn

message: I've been wonder, just what exactly is that layer of yellowish material that covers the child apon birth. Is thias skin or what? This is one of the first times I seen pictures that contain this feature, most others seem to have raw red skin. Whatever it is, it dosn't appear to be perminent, since the few survivors of this disease arn't still covered with it. Would anyone like to share some light on this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.157.98.58 (talk) 02:54, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aspects of the Fetal Skin 

message: Someone has added a photo request to this article. There are at least two good images in polish article about it; one is public domain illustration from 1886 J. Bland Sutton's classic paper, second is .svg image made by me (in polish, but easy to translate). Third image is from turkish wikipedia and it's copyright status is uncertain (however, it's already in wikimedia commons). Filip en (talk) 11:52, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph 

message: just cos wikipedia is not censored doesn't mean you should put disturbing images up, if people really want to see an image of it you can put a link on the page. it is pretty grotesque.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.170.254 (talk) 14:09, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just a diagram, not even an actual photograph. There ius nothing 'grotesque' about it. faithless (speak) 05:56, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  images 

message: Harlequin syndrome should not redirect to Harlequin type ichthyosis. It is a different disorder.
:That is correct.*M ♦ ANDERSON ♦ 198 00:20, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harlequin type ichthyosis vs. Harlequin syndrome 

message: Aside from the ridiculous argument that educational information should be removed because it is disturbing, I move that the elementary genetics problems (frequencies) in the Notable Cases section be removed.  The information should be truncated after "The chances of suffering from the condition were given as roughly one in a million in general." (which, by the way should probably be cited, as I'm sure the chances are actually much lower).  The rest of the information is simple population genetics and is unnecessary.*M ♦ ANDERSON ♦ 198 00:18, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As per no objections to my claim of unnecessary information I will truncate the section.*M ♦ ANDERSON ♦ 198 16:27, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information Removal 

message: This article attracts a lot of vandalism. Unregistered users should not be allowed to edit it. Drutt (talk) 10:00, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I personally agree but I do not think the admins will consider it due to the length of time between edits. If others agree feel free to request it here. ~ Vince Navarro(t/c) 13:21, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: There are websites claiming that Lucy Betts is the oldest survivor in Britain, rather than Nusrit Shaheen.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.118.100 (talk) 12:42, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:   Lucy Betts. 

message: Okay, I'm confused. I just saw a show on the National Geographic Channel, half of which whas on a teenage girl who suffered from Harlequin Ichthyosis; I heard the narrator very clearly, several times. Unfortunately, the contents of this article barely sounds like the same disease she suffers from, and the show went into her symptoms, and the genetic reasons behind it, in great detail.
67.251.76.94 (talk) 04:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  HI Girl on National Geographic Channel? 

message: Much discussion is going on in whether pictures should be added. I would highly disagree to add pictures of Harlequin babies for the reason that... Well, they seem quite disturbing, and if anyone were to stumble upon this by accident, they wouldn't see anything they don't want to. If you really want images, add a link for it at least. --Theukvato (talk) 07:34, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, one point is that most photos of people with HTI aren't available under Wikipedia-compatible licenses. And we can't make fair-use claims on the existing photos, because it's theoretically possible to produce suitably-free photos. DS (talk) 12:46, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: A picture might be to goatse. there is already a illustration and if anyone needed to see an image, they can google it like so:google image search of harlequin ictcyosis
School district 43 CoquitlamLearn with us! 16:21, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  images 

message: how many known cases of HI have their been?  1 in how many carry the gene? --99.101.160.159 (talk) 02:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documented Cases/Genetic Probability 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Harlequin-type ichthyosis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081014173037/http://www.itv.com:80/Lifestyle/ThisMorning/Health/HarlequinIchthyosis/default.html to http://www.itv.com/Lifestyle/ThisMorning/Health/HarlequinIchthyosis/default.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:24, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello everyone.Probably, you need to put a warning before viewing the Gallery,because the images are very unpleasant there,and indeed in the images in this article and in other articles where it is Nokil83a (talk) 15:34, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Strongly agree, but WP:NOTCENSORED and WP:GRATUITOUS are applicable here. The images do satisfy the criteria for inclusion in a Wikipedia article. Casspedia (talk)  11:51, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've successfully requested the notice concerning Wikipedia's uncensored nature to be added onto the article page. Casspedia (talk)  12:17, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Galery and disclaimer 

message: This- https://ru.abcdef.wiki/wiki/Harlequin-type_ichthyosis#Prognosis Nokil83a (talk) 17:28, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  https://ru.abcdef.wiki/wiki/Harlequin-type_ichthyosis#Prognosis 

message: Hello,bad know English language ,etc.,etc.- i in Ukraine (watch my IP-address.....).
Region state Korea not error(?):
1.Pyeon Chang(information about this city in Wikipedia-no?).
2. Pyongyang (information about this city in England Wikipedia-yes and other Wikipedia-yes!).
This now first human in information about " Notable cases " .
Why not error in name this region Korea? 91.217.66.210 (talk) 22:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error name city Pyeon Chang in Korea ? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Mbl5581 (talk) 13:11, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Plagues and People