lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Appleton North High School

message: This page needs substantial work. Factual information and references would be a good start. Llanwar 06:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

message: I took an old edit from this page with all the athletics and edited it (added citations and extra information). It can be viewed in the second section of my sandbox. If you would like me to remake this page into the one that I created, please leave a comment on either my user talk page or my sandbox talk page.  JTP 12:59, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reformatting the page
Talk:1988 in organized crime

message: "Daniel Sciacca, brother of New Jersey Teamster's President Michael Sciacca (an associate of Anthony Provenzano), succeeds his brother as head of the Genovese crime family controlled Local 560."
I've never heard of Michael Sciacca as the boss of the Genovese crime family, or was he the head of something called Local 560 controlled by the Genovese crime family?
--Alexbonaro 11:40, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chinampa

message: The article skips to mention that chinampas yields until 8 harvests per year.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.194.89 (talk) 21:39, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The chinampas were a intensive crop method 

message: mmh.. there is a common misconception here... Chinampas were intended to be artifical islands, but sometimes currents erode the base and they became "floating garden"...
There were to types of chinampas.. Some were dedicated to agriculture, and others were dedicated for living, the material for the last inlcude heavier materials, like rock, and debris form other contruction . Tenochtitlan really was a giant chinampa and continuosly grew on extention by this system.  Nanahuatzin 22:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, Nanahuatzin, although I think their description here as "floating gardens" is meant to be more evocative than literal- they 'appeared as if they were floating'. The article does go on to say they were artificial islands, but I agree that some rewrite is in order to make it more clear.--cjllw | TALK 07:32, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Floating garden"?

message: How can something measure "roughly" 8.2 feet or 29.9 meters?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.144.194.160 (talk) 20:41, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Measurements? 

message: hinampa (Nahuatl: chināmitl [tʃiˈnaːmitɬ]) is a method of Mesoamerican agriculture which used small, rectangular areas of fertile arable land to grow crops on the shallow lake beds in the Valley of Mexico.
http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/nov/13/slum-on-world-heritage-site-mexico-city-rights-xochimilco  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.246.183.246 (talk) 10:42, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  is><used?? 

message: The article gives credit to the Aztecas for the invention of Chinampas when in actual fact this agricultural method ha been in use from pre 1000 bc my the Olmec culture which would suggest that this agricultural system was in use log before the foundation of the Aztec 0empire.
See lecture 0
Source: Maya to Aztec: Ancient Mesoamerica Revealed
Audible: The great courses. 62.60.6.132 (talk) 16:28, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinampa introduction
Talk:Cuicuilco

message: This section reads a little awkwardly to me, and the heading seems a bit vague. Perhaps "Archeological challenges" would be better suited, or even merging the information in the section with another/the lead. Should the wiki specifically mention which buildings are on top of the site? Even my revised version seems to be a repetition of what's in the Archeological Site section. In my view, the two main sections should be a discussion of the pre-modern history of the site (under History), followed by modern investigations and complications (under Archeological Site). Should the bifurcation of the site be mentioned in the last section? There are also no citations in the Current Situation section. 
If the consensus is to keep it, I suggest the following stylistic revision: (I didn't push the revisions because I'm still a little nervous about editing mainspace)
″Cuicuilco's location in a dense urban environment and the 9 to 10-meter thick lava rock layer have presented challenges for archeologists and conservationists, as well as complicated debates over legislation of the archeological heritage. Because of this, the site has been studied less than other comparable archeological sites, such as Teotihuacan and Tula.″
Lots of "should this be different" questions -- hopefully I'll get better at answering them on my own soon! Doopwii123 (talk) 16:28, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Situation section
Talk:Izapa

message: , Based upon the new Robert Rosenswig , I wonder if there is a conflict of interest regarding this article as well that should be declared.–CaroleHenson (talk) 22:10, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential close connection or conflict of interest 
Talk:IIHF World U18 Championship

message: I want to note that the way this tournament is named in the title of this article is incorrect--U18 goes before World, not after. It's the IIHF U18 World Championship.Djob (talk) 10:22, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect name 

message: Is there that big of a difference in U18 and U20 just because of an additional 2 year allowance for players. Plus if 18 and 19 year olds are great players wouldnt most of them be pros and hence not eligible.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.32.31.254 (talk) 04:20, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference between U18 and U20 
Talk:VTun

message: I'll clip some of the content that has no place in WP such as the "Janitor and Fish-monger" stuff.
However, feel free to add facts and references to this fresh article. --Ministry of Truth 12:12, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

message: The intro paragraph is ridiculously promotional.  Also, this program hasn't been maintaned in 3 years, and looks lame in general.  It might be of some value as a reference implementation and it might have been historically useful.  Does anyone use it now?  Phr (talk) 10:09, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  article needs cleanup
Talk:Robbie Brookside

message: Is 240 lb the weight he is announced at when he walks to the ring?(Halbared 12:21, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: SENT JOHNCENA NORTHWOOD SCHOOL MINONG WI 54859  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.125.155.27 (talk) 02:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWE 
Talk:Every Shade of Blue

message: During the AfD it was suggested that a page for the album be created and this content merged into it, but until such time it is better to keep this page.  Eluchil404 12:27, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Harald Tveit Alvestrand

message: Just to make a point regarding WP:BLP: I have read what is written about me here, as of this date, and I have no objection to it being published. --Alvestrand 06:37, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nanango

message: Following the discussion at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board/Archive 20#Copyright violation?, another editor has copied information from http://tourism.southburnett.com.au/townnanango.htm . I have again reverted.--A Y Arktos\talk 12:31, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Força

message: What does the song name mean?  I think that could be included
I believe Nelly herself said it means "kick ass" in Porteguese. 70.140.234.78 21:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The song sample to this page was removed. I guess since there wasn't any discussion on the talk page or reasons in edit summaries that it must have been removed on accident. I'll place it back in. If it wasn't a mistake, let me know here. Thanks! Icestorm815 14:59, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song Sample
Talk:Affection (Koda Kumi album)

message: :It failed to achieve much success in Japan, despite peaking at #12 on the Oricon album chart.
This information appears to have been first added to Wikipedia in this edit on November 8, 2005. All sources on the web I could find looked like they might have been copied from Wikipedia. — A.M. 21:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart peak? 
Talk:Earl of Melfort

message: I've edited the 14->5th Earl in line with Earl of Perth. The issue arrises over the mistaken counting of those heirs between the attainder of the title and it's restoration as having held the title which  by law they could not. 
Looking at the rest of the article we probably need to explain what's happening as there are a few strange contradictions. For instance as the Duc de Melfort wasn't created in the French peerage what exactly was the Conseil d'Etat recognising? The article says a french title - which didn't exist - the other possibility would be the Scottish title which they have no jurisdiction to adjudicate upon. Alci12 12:43, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Conseil d'État recognized the recognition - i.e. the use of the title, not the validity of the title per se.  88.178.189.194 (talk) 18:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Big L 1395

message: This page has been archived. ---J.S  (T/C/WRE) 00:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

message: The Licence period is given as 98 years (2002-2100). Typo? Carnivalist (talk) 22:32, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Licence details 
Talk:Musique (album)

message: I think about moving this article to mju:zɪk, since it is correct name of it. Comments? thank you :) --Monk 08:19, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have created several redirects to the album to reflect the IPA cover title, however both the band's official website and allmusic list the album as Musique, so I think we should keep this as the article's main title – Ikara talk → 22:57, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move 
Template talk:NHL topics

message: I don't think EA's video game series should be in this template. Sure, it is a great historic series, but it is no longer the only one (there is the 2K series). A more appropriate link might be the list of NHL video games. − Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 04:05, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NHL video game series 

message: I think Captains would be a good item to include in the NHL personnel section. 65.94.103.55 (talk) 04:55, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no objections, I added it.  Note that I am the same person who proposed it above. 99.246.133.31 (talk) 02:20, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of captains
Talk:Maya ruins of Belize

message: The given source for this assertion establishes that sites are in danger of destruction, but not that they are in danger of destruction by construction companies using limestone for road fill, nor frequently by. Ps. other sources say looters pose more danger to sites than, say, construction companies - though can't quickly pull up these sources. Asdfjrjjj (talk) 14:16, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re frequency of destruction by roadfill
Talk:Spoileron

message: Don't some flying wing type aircraft rely spoilerons for rudder/yaw control? — Soupisgoodfood 13:04, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Looks like someone did eventually modify that. "But since roll and yaw motion are both to the wing with the raised spoileron, it's usually desirable" does not make much more sense either, unfortunately. 129.107.224.139 (talk) 22:18, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

message: would be helpful.   Midgley (talk) 09:18, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  A picture or diagram 

message: The "Research" section seems like it would be appropriate in a discussion of flight controls, but doesn't relate well to a discussion of flaperons specifically.  I'll delete soon if no one objects. Retswerb (talk) 01:33, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance of "Research" section
Talk:List of the most frequent NHL playoff series

message: Seeing as this article only needs to be updated once a year, if that, depending on matchups, it should probably include the win-loss record too. — MrDolomite | Talk 22:16, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wins and Losses? 

message: I'm proposing a total redo of this table. I would like to actually keep it, but as a subsection to a general historical list of all NHL playoff series, which would be a great help in research. Please see a sample at my sandbox. Jmj713 (talk) 15:20, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reworking the list
Talk:After Bathing at Baxter's

message: I finally acquired an original pressing of this album and discovered a few interesting notes.  The songs are divided into their respective suites on the record, so there are only 3 tracks visible on Side One of the record, and 2 tracks on side 2.  The label divides the tracks up under their headings [so it has an underlined 'The War Is Over' and listed under that heading are Martha (Kantner) and Wild Tyme (H) (Kantner)] and doesn't have #'s listed for any of them.  Won't You Try and Saturday Afternoon are listed separately as both written by Kantner but only have one track time.  And rejoyce is spelled with all lowercase letters. JoeD80 (talk) 00:25, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Vinyl Album Notes

message: Quote: "Rejoyce, a homage to James Joyce's novel "Ulysses"
Eh? The lyric pays lip service to Ulysees with the mentions of Molly Bloom et al but it is a drug song - specifically, an acid song. All I divine from it is that Grace had read Joyce - hardly makes it a "homage".
The lyrics are frequently misrepresented online anyway.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.112.55.60 (talk) 10:27, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: An homage is an acknowledgment of a previous work, so referencing Ulysses within the song is exactly that, an homage. JoeD80 (talk) 00:12, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ulysees?

message: What is this "Baxter's"? AmericanLeMans (talk) 20:14, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Answered. -The Gnome (talk) 00:34, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Baxter's
Talk:Bonampak

message: The text with the picture is incorrect: the frescoes are NOT in the buildings on top of the pyramid. The (single) building that contains the pictures is located on the right-hand side outside the current picture frame, you can just see the steps leading up to it. Stefan29 19:03, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: The article gives 9.17.16.3.12 as January 12, 787. This would be correct IF one uses proleptic Gregorian calendar and the 584285 correlation. Using the GMT correlation and the Julian calendar (used by astronomers) this would be January 6.
9.17.16.3.8 is converted to January 4, A.D. 787. This would be correct IF one was using the Julian calendar and the 584285 correlation. Using the Julian calendar and the GMT correlation this would be January 2. Notice that the two k'in coefficients in the Long Counts differ by four days but the dates differ by eight days. This is the result of using the two different European calendars.
9.17.9.11.14 is converted to July 25, A.D. 780. This would be correct IF one was using the Julian calendar and the 584285 correlation. Using the Julian calendar and the GMT correlation this would be July 23.
So these dates are questionable.
According to Aveni, the Bonampak murals depict a war against Tikal that was timed to coincide with a heliacal rising of Venus (9.18.1.15.10) and a zenith passage of the sun on 9.18.1.15.5 which he converts using the Julian calendar  and 584285 correlation to to August 2, 792 (July 31 GMT). The stone in the ball court also has inscriptions that seem to use astronomical phenomena to commemorate the deeds of Lord Kan II and his grandfather Lord Water. At least those interested in archaeoastronomy can study this if the articles give Long Counts. If anyone has the original reference, it would be worthwhile to check the first date. Senor Cuete (talk) 18:43, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Since these dates are questionable I propose to remove the European calendar dates and use only Long Counts. Senor Cuete (talk) 15:52, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates given in Temple of the Murals section 

message: Reference 12 is cited multiple times but not defined. Can the editor that added this fix it? Senor Cuete (talk) 18:50, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undefined reference
Talk:Chiapas Highlands

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 16:07, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Chiapas highlands →  – As a proper place name this article ought to be capitalized, but there seems to have been some back-and-forth renaming, so I thought I'd see if there was any controversy to be surfaced before renaming it again. Tom Radulovich (talk) 03:22, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 September 2021
Talk:Nakbe

message: The seperate Nakbe and Nakbé articles should be merged. -- Infrogmation 17:39, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP MESO current guidelines, this article should be at Nakbe (without the accent, not required in cases where name originates from Mayan languages).--cjllw | TALK 03:24, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The merger of material from Nakbé into Nakbe has been completed.--cjllw | TALK 23:28, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge action 

message: Need coordinates of site. grr (talk) 04:15, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: This is the only place in Wikipedia where "tecomates" seem to appear. Methinks that since tecomate is such a notable Mesoamerican archaeological artefact (found in several sites in Veracruz, Chiapas, and Guatemala), it should have its own article, where it can be properly described and documented. Omnipedian (talk) 04:44, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, tecomate would make a worthy subject for an article, it awaits only some editor with both time and inclination to spring into being. If you feel suitably disposed, pls proceed! --cjllw ʘ TALK 08:16, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tecomates
Talk:Paso de la Amada

message: There was a significant amount of material in this article discussing the general theories and descriptions of the change from hunter-gathers to villagers.  While it described how a village like Paso de la Amada could come to be, it was describing any village and wasn't uniquely suited to Paso de la Amada.  So, I pulled it out.  FYI, Madman 03:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: good call. -- Oaxaca dan 04:00, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed material on cultural advancement
Talk:Hydrargyrum quartz iodide

message: "HQI" is a trademark of Osram GmbH for their quartz metal halide lamps, and as such, this article need to be deleted as soon as possible, as it is misleading and uses this name as a genericized trademark. זור987 (talk) 08:54, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of this article
Talk:Members of the Red Army Faction

message: Would anyone be interested in making a template, for use on this and other articles, with one instance per person; something like ? Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 13:10, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make template 

message: Few sentences written in such a way to completely demonize and misinform about Meinhof.
A sentence from a whole statement altering its original meaning, and:
"apparently killed herself" ??? 
<< In 1978 the committee published its report, concluding that: "The formal claim that Ulrike Meinhof committed suicide by hanging is unfounded, given the fact that the investigation results reasonably converge to the conclusion that she could not hang herself. Most probably Ulrike Meinhof was already dead before she was hanged and there are warning signs indicating the involvement of a third party regarding her death."[16][17]
Ulrike Meinhof's page in wikipedia ...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stelarov (talk • contribs) 20:54, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section about Meinhof 
Talk:Dave Mohammed

message: I think putting Daves background might help, as his name suggests he is not native to Trinidad
:What about his name suggests that he isn't Trini?  Mohammed is a common surname in Trinidad (actually there was another David Mohammed who played club cricket in Trinidad in the 80s and may have played for Trinidad, I can't remember if he was ever picked for TT).  Guettarda 13:53, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Quattrocento

message: thumb|left|This 1495 lady is Proto-Renaissance, but not Italian
What about the transitional phase from Northern Gothic to Northern Renaissance? I was forced to delink the term here but in fact I shouldn't have had to if the current definition of "Proto-Renaissance" wasn't so restrictive. --Edelseider (talk) 16:09, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree a short article is needed really. I think the term is used rather imprecisely, with a range of meanings. Some might say, I suspect, that Trecento is as good a redirect, if only Italy is considered. Johnbod (talk) 04:02, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, See here. In fact say 1280 to 1400 seems to be the norm - I'll change the redirect to Italian_Renaissance_painting#Proto-Renaissance_painting.  Judging by Google the term is mainly used for Italy, at least in English.  Johnbod (talk) 15:37, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That's very strange, a bit as if art history was still stuck in the time of Ruskin and all those great German masters like "Grünewald" had not yet been rediscovered! --Edelseider (talk) 16:07, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: At least in English, Grünewald is fully Renaissance, and van Eyck "Early Netherlandish painting". Johnbod (talk) 16:27, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: But the early paintings of Grünewald are very much anticipating Renaissance but not yet fully there, see for yourself: :File:Matthias Gruenewald-Coburger Tafel-Abendmahl.jpg. And the same is true of Holbein the Elder, of course. --Edelseider (talk) 16:30, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a case of seeing for myself, but seeing how RS in English normally use these inevitably subjective style-labels. Plenty of northern provincial painters didn't properly absorb Renaissance developments until well after 1700. Johnbod (talk) 16:44, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, and I hope you didn't misunderstand me: I don't blame you for the views of English art history (in fact, I don't blame anybody), I am just wondering. --Edelseider (talk) 17:12, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "Proto-Renaissance" redirect to "Quattrocento"?
Talk:Leg hair

message: I added the hair picture. I don't hope it offends anyone; would like to know. Dextrovert 13:34, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Most seems to be on Leg shaving, though. I'm not sure it's worth discussing on so many pages. Nemo 13:37, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: as this article sits right now, it is far to male-focused.  if there are no objections, i would like to tweak the article to make it more gender-neutral.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stregamama (talk • contribs) 11:52, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  too male-centered