Talk:Social Democratic Party (Romania)

message: "In the legislative elections of 2004, the PSD gained the largest share of the vote but because it did not have a majority, all the other major parties formed the Justice and Truth alliance, which managed to gain a parliamentary majority and is currently in government, consigning the PSD to opposition."
There is a mistake here, in that the Justice and Truth alliance was already formed by PD and PNL prior to the elections, not after them, so after PSD won the elections but didn't have enough to form a majority, PD and PNL convinced two small parties, PUR (PC today), PSD's ally, and UDMR to join them in forming a coalition (NOT as part of the alliance), in order to form a majority. L337 Krew (talk) 21:01, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake 

message: :Image:Psd.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:14, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Psd.jpg

message: The idea that FSN/PSDR/PSD is a leftist party is greatly exaggerated. According to Florin Poenaru, "the movement led by Ion Iliescu was from the very beginning the party of local capitalists and not of the industrial proletariat" (p. 36).  Andrei Pleșu once stated that main post-'89 Romanian political parties do not act on the basis of ideology/doctrine.  Tgeorgescu (talk) 01:05, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: None of the social-demcoratic parties today are parties of the industrial proletariat, does that mean there are not leftist anymore?Anonimu (talk) 11:58, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Here Labour Party (Netherlands) practiced neoliberal economic policy. Now it's in opposition. Tgeorgescu (talk) 13:10, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  And what does it have to do with the PSD? Braganza (talk) 17:31, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The gist is that FSN/PSDR/PSD didn't do Socialist policy. They were privatizing almost everything. Tgeorgescu (talk) 19:44, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

text: I mean Labour Party (Netherlands) Braganza (talk) 11:01, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leftist party 

message: According to Le Monde, PSD is National conservative. I think that this could be added. 
Source: https://www.lemonde.fr/international/article/2018/12/31/la-roumanie-sur-la-voie-de-la-hongrie-et-de-la-pologne_5403800_3210.html RAMSES$44932 (talk) 08:46, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  National-conservatism 

message: Christian left can also be mentioned as ideology, and it is already in the Romanian-language wikipedia. Source: https://www.romania-insider.com/senate-referendum-traditional-family RAMSES$44932 (talk) 08:48, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian left 

message: De jure, PSD is center left. De facto, it is syncretic. I think both should be mentioned RAMSES$44932 (talk) 08:49, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: See #Leftist party: till now I saw no evidence that this party would be left wing. Iliescu and this party practiced a somewhat slower version of shock therapy, but they had never said no to the neoliberal agenda. Massive privatizations do not fit a leftist party. Tell me a company which this party has nationalized. That there are leftist members of this party, I don't deny—however they are lost souls in respect to the policy implemented by their own party. tgeorgescu (talk)  03:23, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political position 

message: Is it Right to view PSD as a continuation of FSN since FDSN was more a brokeaway faction and the two candidated agaist eqchother in the 1992 Elections?
Or is better to have Gherman as the first official Party Leader in 1992 or Illiescu as the First unofficial Party Leader?
As this article on the Party's History might Suggest: http://www.politicaromaneasca.ro/partidul_social_democrat-285 DiGrande (talk) 17:07, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Wrong List of Leaders