Talk:Alexander Lippisch

message: Where is the evidence of this? It is not even mentioned in the text of him even being investigated. This sounds like propaganda to slur his name. I have removed this clause.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.171.98.23 (talk) 16:06, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  War Criminal?? 

message: This was the Lippisch design produced in the greatest numbers; enormous numbers of pilots learned to fly on it, a fair number were hurt or killed by it and copies and variants appeared world wide, possibly built in greater numbers than any other aircraft (discuss, with refs). Simple, unsexy but very influential.TSRL (talk) 23:37, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Zögling

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Alexander Lippisch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051126020648/http://www.centennialofflight.gov/essay/Wright_Bros/Military_Flyer/WR11G1.htm to http://www.centennialofflight.gov/essay/Wright_Bros/Military_Flyer/WR11G1.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:38, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have made research for the Hermann Behrbohm and Bertil Dillner articles and there are some big problems meeting up to "This article needs additional citations for verification. " due to some circumstances: 
* Germany were burnt down to the ground and what was left looted to a large extent at the end of IIWW, so most of the records
* Companies like Saab AB and Boeing empty their personal staff files after some years (this article is about events like 70 years ago) and are gone. 
* Projects were military secrets and as such large portions of the project documentation is also destroyed. 
It means that what is left are things like: 
* The creations (and their attributions can't really be doubted)
* Newspaper articles exists even though they are rare, because the research and development were military secrets
* Informations and notes from relatives. 
I have received some information and articles from the relatives of Hermann Behrbohm and Bertil Dillner that supports the texts of this article about Lippisch (includes relations to Lippisch and his works). So I have been able to improve Lippisch article by such contributions and relate them to the documentation (in their articles) of these people related to Lippisch work. 
I don't think we can get better to meet up the comment "This article needs additional citations for verification.", and I believe the present documentation is fairly enough, to remove the comment "This article needs additional citations for verification.". 
--Zzalpha (talk) 14:13, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs additional citations for verification.  

message: This articles suggests that the Dornier Aerodyne was developed in the US after WW2. The article on the Dornier Aerodyne states that it was developed in Nazi Germany after the war. This is.. confusing. 75.161.38.33 (talk) 10:09, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dornier Aerodyne