lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Women singers

message: Do we really need to be categorizing singers by gender at all? Per Wikipedia:Categorization/Gender, race and sexuality, a special gender, race or sexuality subcategory should only exist if it's possible to write a head article on female singers to explain how they're a distinctly encyclopedic phenomenon separate from singers in general. Is there any real contextual difference to be noted here? Bearcat 19:52, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aquinas College (Michigan)

message: This article needs an infobox, writeright where the logo is currently.  There's a template out there, which I might use myself, but if someone else got around to it first it would probably be much quicker. Euphoria 20:06, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:Concurrent systems

message: I have merged what little content there was here into Concurrency (computer science), and redirected to that article. My reason for doing this was that this article was quite small, already overlapped in content with the concurrency article, and would only generate greater overlap in content if it grew. If there are good reasons for keeping these two articles separate I'd be happy to hear them. --Allan McInnes 20:09, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge and redirect
Talk:Odžaci

message: I removed these parts:
"Villager Anton Mathes gave an eyewitness account of the actions on the "Black Day" of the "Bloody Autumn" in the Vojvodina by partisans allegedly belonging to the Krajiška brigade and how the local Serbs tried to stop the butchery."
"On November 23rd (1944) they started a large scale raid; 181 men and two women were herded into the house of photographer Johann Raab. Meanwhile, 40 young people dug a large mass grave in a field along the road to Karavukovo. At that time the city council consisted of three Serbs: Dobranov, Urbas, and Pavkov.  They knew what was going to happen and succeeded in freeing some of the prisoners. Thus, inkeeper Franz Kraus, merchant Ladislaus Kollmann, and Hans Petko were saved. The three Serbs genuinely tried to prevent the mass murder, however, without success.  Towards midnight the prisoners had to undress and line up in rows of four and were marched to a mass grave. There they were brutally murdered and the corpses thrown into the pit which was then closed. Hans Mayer was the only one who managed to escape during the night. For many days the mass grave was guarded and nobody allowed to go near."
A eyewitness account is too much for the history section of one small town and it is a personal POV of the man who gave that account. You should rather to write general things about those events. There were a thousands of such eyewitness accounts from many people who participated in war. I do not think that they are appropriate here. They rather belong to some separate article about WW2 events. PANONIAN (talk) 20:14, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Three on a Match

message: I removed the claim that Jack Webb appears in this film after trying to find a reliable source to confirm. None of the bios I consulted mention such an appearance, not even that a film crew showed up at his elementary school. The claim should be easy to verify; since it's not, an authoritative source is called for. Richigi (talk) 01:47, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jack Webb claim
Talk:They Drive by Night

message: This section is completely filled with vintage pinball-machine information and has nothing to do with the film's production. I suggest this section be rewritten to include actual production notes. A note could be included about pinball, but edited down because the article is about the film, not pinball. --Utilizer (talk) 01:59, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. this is a good place to find sources. I like The Film Daily, Motion Picture Daily, Motion Picture Herald, and of course Variety. American Cinematographer is also a good source, but they have limited articles. Harrison's Reports is okay, but more for the review section. I'm working on a city project right now, but this is on my list to get to at some point. Onel5969 TT me 04:32, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not uninteresting, but just doesn't belong in the article. Recommend deletion. 150.243.112.16 (talk) 22:41, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Production notes note
Talk:High Sierra (film)

message: I removed the sentence erroneously claiming that Pard the dog was Humprhrey Bogart's own dog.
https://pmbryant.typepad.com/letyourselfgo/zero-the-dog/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyle kursk (talk • contribs) 02:24, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pard the dog.
Talk:You Never Give Me Your Money

message: I removed the lyrics--we usually don't post song lyrics due to copyright. Rob 20:21, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial text

message: The opening paragragh referring to nasality, mock-baritone, impression of styles, etc, is totally subjective and unreferenced.  This isn't a book report.--APDEF (talk) 10:25, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  opening paragraph  

message: The bass on the track is definitely McCartney, overdubbed. You can find bootlegs of the original backing track online, and I've seen one with the bass isolated. Harrison did play bass on the backing for "Golden Slumbers" / "Carry That Weight" at a later session. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bass 

message: Reworded the 2nd sentence in this section so it's clearer which "session" is which.--Daveler16 (talk) 22:44, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background
Talk:Sahara (1943 American film)

message: I don't have an online source to cite, but informally from discussion with film buff friends, I suspect Tambul killing the German aviator may be the first time American cinema had a Black man killing a White man on camera.  And as a "good guy" as well.  There had been murders implied previously, but this was actually shown on screen. --209.221.206.206 (talk) 05:05, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tambul kills von Schletow
Talk:Wur

message: I've attempted a little copyediting to add some legibility to the article- as it stood I couldn't make much sense of it. I don't think I've deleted any information as such, but then again I'm not an expert in minor tribes of Pakistan, so if someone more knowledgeable could check it over for discrepancies I'd be grateful. Also- as there's such a voluminous References list, why isn't there more information in the article? Dewrad 20:22, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Dark Passage (film)

message: According to Robert Osborne (TCM), you don't see his face until 1 hour 6 minutes into the movie. Prior to that, it's seen only in shadows or with bandages or POV shots. Worth mentioning? Trivia: This is the first movie together as Mr. & Mrs. Bogart. They weren't married when they filmed it, though romantically involved. By the time it screened in theatres, Bacall had become the 4th Mrs. Bogart (in The Big Sleep, Bacall was in love with Bogart, though he was already married; due to the delay in the movies release, by the time it _was_ screened, Bogart and Bacall were a public item).
Macshill (talk) 05:05, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bogie's face 

message: The taxi driver and also the surgeon play unreal roles giving a mythical  (or should that be mystical) quality to the movie that appears present to some extent in the entire film.  Perhaps this a better way to put what critic Bosley Crowther refers to by this rather incredible yarn.  Perhaps others can comment on this aspect.  It reminds of the origin of theater in Hellenic mythology.   hgwb (talk) 08:32, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mythical Qualities
Talk:Heaven Knows, Mr. Allison

message: The reference to blocked funds is obscure. An explanation would be helpful.Bill (talk) 00:54, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Blocked funds
Talk:Moulin Rouge (1952 film)

message: What, not even a plot synopsys? Is it that bad? - Redmess 00:00, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: Ferrer used a set of knee-pads of his own design which allowed him to walk on his knees with his lower legs strapped to his upper body.--Filll (talk | wpc) 15:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this sentence supposed to mean? 

message: This article had me inadvertently looking into the movie "Moulin Rouge". Zsa Zsa Gabor's performance of the signature song has always haunted me. I have tried to identify the character on and off over the years. Now with this article, here is what I discovered.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjDqxuiyzB0
In the Wikipedia and the IMdB, it says Zsa Zsa played Jane Avril,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Avril
but Avril was a dancer whereas Zsa Zsa played a singer. The singer in Toulouse-Lautrec's life was Yvette Guilbert.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yvette_Guilbert
Perhaps Hollywood has confused things again. Yvette's signature costume has her wearing long black gloves. You see them in every picture Toulouse drew of her, and you see Zsa Zsa wear them as she emerges to sing her famous song. Zsa Zsa is definitely playing Yvette. The song sung by Zsa Zsa used the voice of Muriel Smith.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muriel_Smith_(singer)
Muriel also played the black dancer, Aicha, in the movie who was the rival of La Goulue. They had a fight in the opening scene.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pionade (talk • contribs) 17:17, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Character does Zsa Zsa Gabor play? 
Talk:The Unforgiven (1960 film)

message: I haven't seen the movie but I appreciate that having read the wikipedia article the decision as to which side Rachel chooses is not revealed. Well written.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.255.122.231 (talk) 14:26, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Well done 

message: Am I the only one who thinks that the idea that a full blooded Native American baby could not be so different looking so as to not be identified by Caucasians? Or even when that baby became an adult?  This plot is just absurd.
I absolutely agree and have thought so ever since I saw the movie for the first time on TV many years ago.2600:1700:7F11:6420:842F:CE8F:45E1:478C (talk) 21:07, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ridiculous Plot 

message: According to Turner Classic Movies three crew members were killed on a return flight to the US. And, during a filming break, Audie Murphy and a friend decided to go duck hunting on a nearby lake. The boat capsized and Murphy nearly drowned, but was saved by Inge Morath, a female photographer who had been taking pictures nearby. 149.20.203.67 (talk) 22:04, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production Problems
Talk:The Night of the Iguana

message: I've moved the information about the film to The Night of the Iguana (film). This article can therefore be about the play. Count de Ville 19:29, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Film

message: Having just watched the play performed in its entirety, I firstly question the claim that Ms. Fellowes is an "overtly lesbian" character, as the only claims of her homosexuality come in the form of goading/derogatory remarks from Shannon--who chiefly characterizes her as "butch" and a single time in the play makes a play on words including "dykes" purely to provoke her ire. I also dispute that the cited article even claims as much--it appears to be a contemporary review of the play in which the critic deems the character a "latent lesbian", which language itself undermines the "overt" part of "overtly lesbian". For now, I am deleting the line, and moving the cited review to the external links section. Message me on my talk page if you disagree or have a different suggestion. YarLucebith (talk) 05:22, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Lesbian Fellowes?
Talk:The Kremlin Letter

message: Much grown, with the reaction section wholly re-written and thoroughly sourced. Gwen Gale (talk) 22:43, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: done over
Talk:Fat City (film)

message: Is the actor mentioned in this article the same person as Sixto Rodriguez?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.102.27.72 (talk) 11:26, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sixto Rodriguez 

message: Should the Bob Dylan Deep Focus Retrospectrum painting based on Fat City be mentioned?
https://www.facebook.com/EDLISAdmin/photos/oa.1380335105776649/1291614534670481
EDLIS Café Press (talk) 15:09, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bob Dylan painting
Talk:The Man Who Would Be King (film)

message: that John Huston was shot during the filming of this movie. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.101.150.105 (talk) 01:22, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I didn't realize 

message: Can someone tell me the real name of the character Utah? He also played in the film Allan Quatermain and the Lost City of Gold.--94.193.135.142 (talk) 21:35, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Utah

message: The last paragraph of the introduction is somewhat confusing as Morocco is in North Africa and is only ever included in the term "Middle East" in its very broadest sense. Should this be paragraph be changed to reflect that the costumes of the film are "clearly not 'Maghreb' but Central Asian"? Benson85 (talk) 19:35, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It might be worth noting that all the "Indians" in the film, appear to look very Arab and speak in Moroccan Arabic. Billyfish may ask a question in Urdu and the local will inexplicably respond in Arabic. The locals chant the first verse of the Koran (in Arabic of course) when Danny is hailed as King. I guess the director thought that it didn't matter as long as the actors were "darkie" and speaking non-English "gibberish", that would be good enough for the audience. 81.168.123.160 (talk) 15:04, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: He was right. 2601:5C6:4180:3D20:74C0:D4DA:C17A:2239 (talk) 16:22, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  North Africa/Middle East/Morocco 

message: they have a song named "The Man who Would be King" in their self-titled album, from 2004. Should this be put on the main article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.107.98.100 (talk) 06:58, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Libertines 

message: Carnehan referers to himself as a Gunnery Sgt which is a US Rank-the British Army equivalent is Colour sergeant!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.83.72.154 (talk) 02:25, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Goof in movie

message: It seems to me that all those words following the "Cast", starting with "Huston had planned to make the film since the 1950s...", would ordinarily in Wikipedia be put in a section called "Production". I would create it, but I don't know how. Is there someone out there (1) who agrees with me, and (2) who knows how, that could do this? 71.204.84.204 (talk) 16:39, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't there be a "Production" section? 
Talk:The Hobbit (1977 film)

message: An IP editor has seen fit to remove 2 statements from the lead. I've restored them both per status quo ante, and because they are both necessary to summarize the article. Both are reliably cited, and they are among the few things said about the film by 3rd parties, i.e. they are vital facts here. Further, they concisely present the 2 sides of opinion on this film, for and against. As such they are absolutely necessary. The IP's assertions that these are "awkward" in the lead, or undue weight, are simply incorrect and unjustified. Perhaps a pro-film partisan might prefer critical comment not to exist: but it would be that opinion which is out of order on Wikipedia. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:52, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not so much that there are "pro-film partisans" for the 1977 Hobbit television special (lol), just that an offhand total dismissal of the work (well after the fact, by a LOTR specialist primed to not like this sort of thing) doesn't really summarize the the general critical reception or even the views of those who don't like it. I think more negative contemporary takes treat it as a sort of oddity: one of the many bits of pop-culture cruft that would have otherwise been completely forgotten if not for the fact that it's an adaption of the Hobbit. "Peabody winner or total trash" makes it sound like it's a far more divisive work than it is. I'd recommend something a little more muted. 2600:1700:37A8:250:1404:4008:9F2F:CD70 (talk) 07:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  The job of the lead is only to summarize the body of the article. It has been difficult to find Reliable Sources that discuss this film in any detail (and in fact there are 6 uncited claims in the text, which could be removed by anybody, according to Wikipedia policy); those that could be found have been faithfully described and cited in the article, and the lead then simply summarizes the resulting text. Douglas A. Anderson, by the way, is a well-read and professional scholar very familiar with everything to do with The Hobbit. If you have reliable contemporary sources then feel free to cite them using :Template:Cite book or :Template:Cite journal (like the existing citations) in the article body, and we can update the lead from the extended article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balance in lead
Talk:Yercaud

message: Thanks for the suggestions Postdlf
--bkris 16:04, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thank you!! 

message: I removed a large amount of content from the article that I felt was not encyclopedic in nature, but more like a travel guide, per WP:NOTTRAVEL. For reference, here is a link to the old version, in case anything can be reincorporated in a manner more fitting for an encyclopedia article, or be used to add to the relevant WikiTravel page. Dancter (talk) 17:40, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Travel guide material

message: This article has been tagged for copy editing, and as a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, I have attempted a cleanup. However, there are many confusing points on which I cannot proceed without clarification:
*Did the British discover the land and start the town or discover the town?
*Did the officer introduce coffee or write the accounts?
*What is "metalled?"
*What is "with effect?"
*Is the listed rainfall yearly?
*Are the 7 days of the festival for just flowers or the entire event?
*What is the Lady's seat? An overlook?
*Are the Servaroyan and Kaveri the deities of the hills and river? I guessed at the meaning.
*In what war did Tipu Sultan use Bear's cave?
*What does "Salem - 38 km Yercaud Express from Chennai." mean?
*What is "Yercaud assembly constituency"?
I have marked these instances in the wikitext using html comments. If you can answer these questions, simply go into the actual page text and fix it there yourself. Don't answer here and have someone else put it into the article.
Also, there are too many pictures, and it seems that it was written as a travel guide.--Anon423 (talk) 20:49, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy edit 

message: I am improving this article please dont make any major changes. thanks for understanding. 72.138.118.191 (talk) 20:48, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment in 2010
Talk:The Cardinal

message: eccentric to name the film's composer in the first paragraph but not the film's star.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.170.183.150 (talk) 07:22, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  it's 

message: whats up dudes this is Mia zurawski  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.117.75.231 (talk) 00:36, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  hi 

message: Who performed the song Stay With Me in the film?
Stay with Me (uncredited) Music by Jerome Moross Lyrics by Carolyn Leigh
Many sang it after the film, from Frank Sinatra recorded in 1963 to Bob Dylan recorded in 2014! But why are the performer[s] in the film unknown and uncredited? It was without words, there are no lyrics in the film. 
EDLIS Café  14:08, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who sang the song Stay With Me in the film
Talk:Conquest of the Planet of the Apes

message: Whoever keeps adding Central City into this and other entries from the Planet of the Apes films is just plain wrong.  Central City is not from the movies--it's from the TV show.  This film takes place in California, at the Ape Management Complex.  That information was corrected, but someone else came and put back the Central City bits--which are wrong.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rassmguy (talk • contribs) 01:16, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This film does NOT take place in Central City

message: Haven't seen it on any recent Conquest DVD's.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.2.90.61 (talk) 14:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does the original ending footage still exist? 

message: The Paradox section reads terribly and needs to be re-organized.  Also, it doesn't address the fact that in Zira and Cornelius's interrogation in Escape..., they maintain that an ape named Aldo (not specifically a gorilla) says "No." four hundred years after the plague arrives on Earth.  Either that history was also fabricated without them knowing or the birth of Caesar had accelerated the ape revolt by four centuries.  Also, there are two apes named Aldo in Conquest...: The chimpanzee being beaten by police in the beginning and the gorilla beating Governor Breck at the end - who presumably becomes General Aldo in Battle....  It should be reflected that these are two seperate apes.  In any case, "the class is ended!  The schoolroom is closed! Now we go back to riding HORSES!!!"
20.132.64.141 (talk) 19:47, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It certainly needs cleaning.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.169.192.50 (talk) 11:26, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning up the Paradox Section 

message: Per the wikipedia article on alternate history:
"Science fiction set in what was the future but is now the past, like Arthur C. Clarke's 2001: A Space Odyssey or Nineteen Eighty-Four , are not alternate history because the author has not made the conscious choice to change the past." ( Steven H Silver. "Uchronicle". Helix. Retrieved 2009-05-26.) --216.31.124.206 (talk) 21:25, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is NOT an alternate history film 

message: Please help me figure out this location where the building is the same production site as Star Trek season 1: episode 29 Operation Inialation 67.4.74.180 (talk) 05:58, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The name of the Star Trek episode is 'Operation -- Annihilate!'. The filming location is noted in the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_--_Annihilate!#Production . Conquest was filmed at UC Irvine (https://www.orangecoast.com/stuff-we-love/uc-irvine-as-backdrop-for-apes/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CConquest%20of%20the%20Planet%20of,futuristic%20architecture%20of%20both%20places) and Century City. SonOfThornhill (talk) 14:09, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The city where the apes are held is also the same place shown in the original Star Trek series, episode 29 of the first season. The episode was named Operation Inialation