lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Television in the Bahamas

message: I approve of whoever nominated of the merger. I can sum up every single station in the Bahamas here: ZNS-TV 13 Nassau, and ZNS-TV-1 Freeport.  User:Raccoon Fox - Talk  12:44, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Throwing every television station in Haiti, the Bahamas, Trinidad, Jamaica, the Dominican Republic, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands and the US Virgin Islands into a single :Category:Television stations in the Caribbean, rather than country-by-country subcategories, was entirely the wrong way to go about categorizing them. Especially since, for one thing, Bermuda is not in the Caribbean, and for another thing, somebody (I won't name names...okay, I'll name names: User:Ronald20) also categorized all the Dominican Republic stations in :Category:Television stations in Central America. I've reorganized the whole mess properly, and accordingly :Category:Television stations in the Bahamas requires its own parent article. Thus, I'm recommending that the merge not proceed. Bearcat 07:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Tornado outbreak of April 8–9, 1999

message: hey the Wilmington NWS office has a page on this storm http://www.erh.noaa.gov/er/iln/4999.htm I'll go ahead and add it to an external links sectionDr Denim 12:52, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: also, is the center tag supposed to be there? and here's a page of articles from the cinicinati Enquirer http://www.cincinnati.com/tornado/ Dr Denim 13:10, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: At what point did it become the Blue Ash-Montgomery tornado? Why is is called that? 
Is there any more information you want to include? Do you have any pictures you could put on the page, tornado damage, etc.?    KarenAnn 18:35, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy editing article 

message: I propose to change the title of this article since the Cincinnati Outbreak had at least 55 tornadoes from April 8 to the early hours of the 9th from Nebraska to Virginia.
What it the best title for this article since it clear that at least 55 tornadoes have been confirmed from this system?
* April 1999 Cincinnati tornado outbreak (with or without the April)
* April 1999 Cincinnati Tornado
* April 1999 Ohio Valley Tornado Outbreak
* April 1999 Midwest Tornado Outbreak
--JForget  22:36, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: April 1999 Midwest Tornado Outbreak would probably be best.  Lou-86 (talk) 06:41, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There may have been previously moves.  Hwever, I moved "Cincinnati Tornado of April 1999" to "April 1999 Cincinnati tornado" to comply with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (events). --Rosiestep (talk) 23:29, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move
Talk:Adra, Purulia

message: Nearest big city of Adra is Asansol Jn. It is 1 hour journey where you can take trains for many destination.Raghunathpur is the nearest popular town near Adra from where you can have a good bus connectivity for many places like Purulia,Asansol,Bankura.
  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.21.154.14 (talk) 05:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Request 

message: ===Major Paras===
RMS COMPLEX(BIRU'S HOUSE) Jyoti mode, Fida mode, Mama mode, Laaldanga, Panchudanga, Kamlasthan,Jhariyadi, 64 unit, Medical para, Traffic colony, Fighters colony, Beniasole (upper and lower), Palashkola, Gayadih, North institute para, 36 koli (Near Balaji puja pandal), Church para, Chunnabhatti, Retirement colony, Subhash Nagar and so on...
Grandmasterka 00:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed from article due to lack of context... 

message: RMS COMPLEX(BIRU'S HOUSE) Jyoti mode, Fida mode, Mama mode, Laaldanga, Panchudanga, Kamlasthan,Jhariyadi, 64 unit, Medical para, Traffic colony, Fighters colony, Beniasole (upper and lower), Palashkola, Gayadih, North institute para, 36 koli (Near Balaji puja pandal), Church para, Chunnabhatti, Retirement colony, Subhash Nagar and so on...
Grandmasterka 00:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Paras
Talk:List of television stations in the Caribbean

message: redundant with List of Caribbean television channels, and that one's much more complete and organized.  User:Raccoon Fox - Talk  12:58, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Other article had no additional information, so I replaced it with a redirect here. I also removed the merge template that was here, and added the template for WP:TVS. AlexDW 17:24, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of television stations in the Caribbean 

message: This appears to be a list of stations in the West Indies, since it includes West Indian islands outside the Caribbean, e.g. Bahamas, Turks and Caicos, Bermuda  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.68.134.1 (talk) 19:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caribbean? 
Talk:Sarah Lawrence College: Alumniae/i

message: Since I don't know how to change article titles, I'll just say that I think that the correct words are alumna (fem. sing.), alumnus (masc. sing.), alumnae (fem. pl.) and alumni (masc. pl.) Alumni is usually used for mixed-gender classes. I would change the heading to "Alumni/ae". --Nufftin 13:03, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Hoyt Vandenberg

message: This man's name should gave a Sr. suffix. This US AF general (RIP) had a son, USAF, who was also a general officer, Hoyt Vandenberg, Jr., who is retired and I believe still living.  Hoyt Jr.'s Wikipedia entry appears correct. 71.220.13.78 (talk) 23:07, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sr. (senior suffix)
Talk:Devin Harris

message: Is that big enough to have a mention? Maybe a "personal life" tab could be set up.Ehccheehcche (talk) 20:03, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beat by an English streetballer/personal life
Talk:US Standard Light Rail Vehicle

message: In the article's litany of charges against the USSLRV comes this line: 
"These problems were coupled with a very high mean distance between failure"
Surely high mean distance between failures would be a good thing -- it would mean that the cars would travel on average quite far in between failures.  In the context of the sentence, though, it seems that this is intended to be bad.  Should the sentence read "very low mean distance between failure"? --Jfruh 13:47, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this is late and it's been long rectified, but given that I was the original writer of the article it was an oversight on my behalf and nothing more. Having ridden the USSLRV on many occassions in the past, I can vouch that it's hard to find positives in it and tried my hardest to do an impartial article even with the proof that Boeing did what they did in its formation. When TA's are having to do public apologies for their unreliability, is it easy to do something totally impartial? Scrabbleship 01:09, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, Scrappleship, didn't mean to impugn your objectivity in any way.  I lived in the San Francisco area for some years and had pleny of opportunities to ride in these creaky old vehicles.  I mainly just wanted to double-check that my suspicions about the typo were correct. --Jfruh (talk) 01:15, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mean distance between failures?

message: What is UMTD?  Do you mean UMTA? n2xjk 16:05, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible errors or omissions

message: Boeing Vertol was also involved with the federally sponsored state of the art cars.  I'm not sure if the SOAC project should be mentioned here or in its own article.  n2xjk 02:42, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point.  I'd vote for making the SOAC project part of this article, unless contributors fill it up with too much. Dogru144 06:18, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions

message: Anyone able to find / repair the photo page referred to in the fourth link in External sites? Dogru144 06:18, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo problem in link

message: I removed the following text from the passage about Manchester; the SF cars had steps that could be raised to the level of the floor, so their existence shouldn't have been an issue, at least not for the reason given.
Finally, the Muni trams have steps up from the street for boarding, where as Metrolink has platforms at the same height as the passenger compartment floor, meaning the steps would need removal, and the doors changed to match.
66.92.14.198 (talk) 07:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manchester
Talk:Schwan's Company

message: Rather than leave this up for years waiting for it to become impartial and informative, or continue to allow Schwan to gradually and thoroughly edit out any information it deems undesirable, just delete it.  The company is diligently revising it to keep it a current marketing piece, which should not be tolerated by Wikipedia.  Alternatively, Wikipedia could disclose that it has some kind of marketing relationship with Schwan that allows this article exemption from wiki rules.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.190.119 (talk) 23:03, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just Eliminate this Article Because It's just a Sales Piece 

message: This page should be moved given the rebranding.Ulmanor (talk) 14:28, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Yelloh 

message: The last sentence of the first paragraph ("Schwan's Company no longer owns the home-delivery business that was known as Schwan's Home Service, which is currently rebranding to Yelloh.") seemingly contradicts the first sentence of the second paragraph ("The Schwan's family maintains 100 percent ownership of Minnesota-based Schwan’s Home Service, a privately held, independent entity traced to the company’s home-delivery business launched by Marvin Schwan in 1952"). Or are there two businesses; one that was sold off and another that was maintained by the family? Dewey Finn (talk) 20:48, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Schwan's Company and Yelloh (formerly Schwan's Home Service) have been completely different businesses with different ownership and management for five years. Schwan's Company, the parent company, was sold to CJ CheilJedang Corporation in 2019. The sale did not include what is now known as Yelloh. 205.142.252.5 (talk) 13:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory sentences
Talk:Nord Noratlas

message: It is obscenely difficult to determine just where these Noratlases snuck off to.  I have ordered a copy of a certain Jane's book in the hopes that it will be able to clear up the mystery; for now I have put in a common set of numbers one sees floating around.  The 208 N-2501s, 186 N-2501Ds, 6 N-2501ISs, and 6 N-2502Fs are the only numbers that I have not seen conflicting numbers on. -- Saaber 14:05, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Numbers of Aircraft and Where

message: France    	Air Force: 208 N-2501; Navy: 1 N-2504
Germany   	Air Force: 186 N-2501D
Greece    	Air Force: 52 N-2501D, 1 N-2508 (from Germany)
Israel    	Air Force: 6 N-2501IS, 16 N-2501D (from Germany)
Angola    	Air Force: N-2501D, N-2502A, N-2502B (from Portugal); probably 7 total
Djibouti  	Air Force: 3 ex-French N-2501s
Mozambique	Air Force: 7 ex-Portuguese N-2501D.
Niger     	Air Force: 4 N-2501D (from Germany), 1 N-2501 (from France)
Nigeria   	Air Force: 2 N-2501D (from Germany) from an original order for 10 (the rest were diverted to Israel). Unconfirmed reports that 4 N2501 were acquired from France. In 1972 two more N2501 were purchased from France for use as spares.
Portugal  	Air Force: 6 N-2502F, 3 N-2502A (from Air Algérie), 19 N2501D (from Germany)
Rwanda    	Air Force: 2 ex-French N-2501s.
Table moved from article and replaced by standard info. Piotr Mikołajski 22:40, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Former Operators

message: These sections are missing, there appears to be at least one still flying (or it was in 2009!). Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 16:21, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Aircraft on display/Survivors sections
Talk:Arizona's 7th congressional district

message: The 2004 Republican challenger Joseph Sweeney's link goes to the page for the actor Joseph Sweeney.  I'd also like to note that he's been dead for 40 years.--Ge Ming 23:11, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong link--Joseph Sweeney 
Talk:Arizona's 5th congressional district

message: There is a big problem with this page; the 5th Dist (before 2003) was in southeastern AZ (now 8th dist).  The way that the article is currently presented implies that Jim Kolbe and Jim McNulty represented Scottsdale and Tempe, when, in fact, they always represented SE AZ.66.210.57.10 (talk) 00:17, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Arizona's 2nd congressional district

message: I noticed that the demographic info box didn't make sense, so I tallied up everything. It comes out to 111.8%. You can't blame 11.8% in rounding of 6 categories (almost 2% each category), so someone fudged the numbers. -NordsternMN (talk) 18:19, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Math doesn't add up

message: District 2 includes Surprise?   On the Map it doesn't.  In the text it does. 67.183.47.242 (talk) 20:03, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map doesn't match text description of where district is in State of AZ 

message: The map posted is from the 2010s redistricting cycle, the 2020s puts this district in rural Northern Arizona, it's much different in composition to the AZ-02 of the 2010s which was in SE Arizona and included Tucson. Singh117 (talk) 01:47, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map is completely outdated 

message: The geographical size is outdated (it's from the old second district). 184.98.53.107 (talk) 19:50, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Land Area
Talk:Arizona's 3rd congressional district

message: Are candidates too lazy to even put their names on wikipedia, or are no Republicans running against Shadegg in the primary, got my ballot today.  Sure Shadegg is great on border security but he's a free trader, and I don't vote for free traders.98.165.6.225 (talk) 01:35, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Republican Primary
Talk:Arizona's 4th congressional district

message: Coordinates are wrong. — goethean 14:02, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  coordinates
Talk:TOSEC

message: Please add a link to the actual TOSEC specification. I can't find it, it's a simple .txt file and it's hardly indexed anywhere. It's not even linked to from the TOSEC site.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
it's available from the tosec site, check the "docs" section
-----
added it: http://www.romcenter.com/datafiles/tosec/tosec_naming_convention.htm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.173.171.222 (talk) 16:56, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Link
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Zennie

message: This is in response to AnonEMouse's comments.  AnonEMouse is saying that simply by submitting the text, Zennie has licensed it under the GFDL.  That's great, that's my assumption as well.  However, please note that Zennie has made it absolutely clear in email to me that he refuses to license the text under the terms of the GFDL.  I have pointed out to him that WP:OWN states that he is licensing it thus, and that the edit page itself notes this as well.  He claims to wholeheartedly reject this.  I agree this is silly.  I'm quite happy to work on the assumption that Zennie's actions, by submitting the text, are an explicit agreement of this license.  In fact, I believe this is exactly how Wikipedia works.  However, once again, Zennie denies this.  My understanding, though I do not want to put words in AnonEMouse's mouth, is that we should just ignore Zennie's rejection because Zennie, even though he denies it in comments and in email, is in fact licensing his contributions under the GFDL.  --Yamla 14:18, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This reads like there's some hair splitting going on here. What's the goal? To get Zennie to admit to GFDL ... in order to do what? In order to allow him to put his company's biographical blurb on his own user page? He should be able to do that. In order to use that blurb in one or more Wikipedia articles wholesale? We shouldn't do that, it's too advertising-like. In order to be able to use it as a reference? We can do that regardless of licence. In order to use individual bits and pieces of it in articles? We can do that already, one can't copyright either facts or the English language. AnonEMouse (squeak) 14:31, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The goal is to get a comment that simply by uploading text, users are agreeing to the GFDL.  Thus, that any text Zennie contributes is licensed under the GFDL even though he claims this is not the case.  This would necessarily resolve the copyvio and the dispute I currently have with him.  The dispute is simply that Zennie claims his contributions are not licensed under the GFDL, I claim his contributions are.  On the other hand, if Zennie is right, we cannot accept his blurb on his user page because he has not granted Wikipedia any such license.  To be clear, I agree that we can use that blurb as a reference, even if Zennie does not license it under the GFDL.  --Yamla 14:51, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: AnonEMouse
Talk:Louisiana's 5th congressional district

message: A correct current map is at http://alexander.house.gov/district-map1/ . Rammer (talk) 03:56, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_talk:LA-districts-109-05.gif#Update_needed  
Talk:Louisiana's 7th congressional district

message: This article is missing the list of people who held the seat.
HankW512 (talk) 21:22, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  List Is Missing 
Talk:Louisiana's 8th congressional district

message: Had to go back to google to find LA-8.
Maybe that re-direct needs to be a disambiguation page.D.C.Rigate (talk) 10:52, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ended up here looking for the aircraft.
Talk:Louisiana's 3rd congressional district

message: I noticed that here, and on his Congressional biography, that John Bennett Dawson is listed as having died after the 1844 re-election. However, John H. Harmanson's page and Congressional biography lists him as being elected in 1844. Harmanson's  from 1850 states that Dawson was "appointed... to the postoffice in this city [New Orleans]" and that Harmanson was "brought out for congress by his party". What date should we use as the end of Dawson's term? Thanks, Alextheconservative (talk) 16:11, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dawson and Harmanson
Talk:Nuremberg Defense

message: - Boyd Reimer (talk) 21:24, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

message: Peersonally, I am against this move, since the nuremberg defense is, as far as I am aware, the legal term for this form of defense. The aformentioned article is also more international in it's tone as it currently stands. Rather, the merge should be in the opposite direction, making "Just following orders" a redirect to the nuremberg defense. LinaMishima 00:47, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to keep things organized, I propose that this discussion should occur all in one place (in the Talk Page of only one article, not two). To that end, to participate in this discussion, please follow this link: Talk:Superior_Orders#Merge_proposal. Thank you - Boyd Reimer (talk) 13:12, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge of nuremberg defense 

message: : Adolf Eichmann, Wilhelm Keitel, and other Nazis tried at Nuremburg unsuccessfully used the defense during their trials.
This should be rephrased; Eichmann did not stand trial at Nuremberg, but in Israel in the 60's. I'll try to think of something. Naphra 21:56, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Eichmann

message: : Wilhelm Keitel, Alfred Jodl, and other Nazis
Rephrased this, neither Keitel nor Jodl were Nazis (their Nazi sympathies notwithstanding). Naphra 20:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Keitel and Jodl

message: Reading Command responsibility and Nuremberg Defense side-by-side is confusing, not because they are so contradicting, but because neither really effectively called attention to the moral conflict. Each article should have a secion explaining the conflict in doctrines, and how this conflict is resolved in practice (ie, the scope of each etc). And if I'm really confused and there isn't actually conflict between the two ideas, this should also be made explicit enough to be understandable by a non-expert (like me!) --gwc 23:24, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: May I suggest you read the article Victor's justice then. that should clear up any confusion that you may have. (nope, i am not cynical at all. ;)) --161.50.48.2 02:00, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Command responsibility 

message: I had an argument with my local police as they set up roadblocks to randomly stop people and draw blood to test for drunk drivers.  I felt that was unconstitutional as they weren't doing it based on erratic driving or some other reasonable suspicion.  One of the officers offered a defense based on new laws like John Warner defense act and Patriot act, but the rest said exactly "I'm just following orders".
Is it correct to describe these officers as offering a nuremberg defense, or is this only a wartime thing, for more serious acts like killing?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wagonwheel99 (talk • contribs) 19:33, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it a correct term to use outside of a military context?
Talk:Structure Of Management Information

message: Regarding the issue of importance, I suspect there were motivations behind SMI: 1) to specify the subset of ASN.1 that would be used for network management; and 2) to pin-down a reference, since there is no Internet Standards track RFC for ASN.1.  Other than that, SMI really doesn't seem to add much value beyond ASN.  I could, of-course, be sadly mistaken.
--Paul 21:21, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  importance 

message: Come to think of it, this should probably be merged with either the article on SNMP, or the article on MIBs (the latter is probably the better fit).  When I get a chance, I'll look-up the proper page-top tag for a proposed merge.
--Paul 20:39, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge
Talk:W. Pat Jennings

message: The article misses Pat Jenning's daughter, Mary Ann Hovis.
https://www.bradleysfh.com/obituary/mary-ann-hovis 2001:579:A0D0:B80:493C:68A3:935D:376B (talk) 18:55, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pat Jennings Children incomplete
Talk:TZU

message: The Lead section was too long for an article such as this; I have edited the section accordingly but no content has been lost.--Soulparadox (talk) 17:08, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive Lead section 

message: The insertion of quotes from reviews of the band have been inserted without citations—I have been unable to locate sources on the Internet, so have inserted tags instead. Hopefully the original author can assist, as this is fairly poor practice.--Soulparadox (talk) 04:04, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Media quotes 
Talk:Ghosts of the Great Highway

message: Last sentence of the third paragraph is a bit misleading regarding the song Glenn Tipton. I believe it is fairly obvious from the lyrics that the speaker of the song is a serial killer:
"I buried my first victim when I was nineteen
 Went through her bedroom and the pockets of her jeans
 And found her letters that said so many things
 That really hurt me bad
  I never breathed her name again
 But I liked to dream about what could have been
 I never heard her calls again
 But I like to dream"
Therefore I don't believe the song should be included as an example of "lightness of spirit", although the song does sound nice.
Walker222 (talk) 22:03, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Phrases like "surprising lightness of spirit" and "impassioned, flexible vocal performance" read like a review and are not appropriate for Wikipedia.  (This is a pretty mild case of inappropriate review-like tone, but since it's being discussed...)  Published reviews should be quoted and cited, but the article itself should not evaluate the work. SlubGlub (talk) 04:18, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "occasionally surprising lightness of spirit"