lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:MacLean & MacLean

message: I can find nothing to support that "Dolly Parton's Tits" was ever released as a single in Canada, yet alone was ever released outside Canada and made the charts in the UK. If no one can provide a source for this, I'll have to delete it. 23skidoo (talk) 17:19, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The official website says it was a Top 100 hit in the UK, and was used as the theme music for a British TV show.  It's likely the single was issued in the UK, but not Canada, because of its use as a theme song.  The single cannot be found on everyhit.com, which only covers the top 40 of British charts. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 05:06, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Do we know what TV show? I find it odd that a song with that sort of lyric would have been allowed on British TV in such a format (unless maybe it was a cable show). Sadly, as the official website was run by Blair we cannot investigate further at that end. 23skidoo (talk) 16:02, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's on Blair's website, but my link went to a specific page (not my intention), and it wasn't the right one.  I've fixed it to point to the main page, and added the name of the show to the article.  Unfortunately, I can't find any info about the show, not even on Google.  I have no idea what kind of show it was, or whether it was from the BBC.  As for the lyric being allowed on TV, there are some things (especially in comedy shows) that the Brits get away with, that nobody else can. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 17:56, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's true. It just sounds odd that a song about a specific person would be chosen for such a thing. Adding to the confusion is the fact I've never heard of any of M&M's recordings being released outside of Canada. I always thought they were the comedy equivalent of Stompin Tom Connors in that regard. 23skidoo (talk) 18:36, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: British charts?

message: I just noticed that parts of this page have been copied on the official MacLean & MacLean website. I recall when the original wording was added, so this is not a copyvio on our part, however if someone has time, they should examine the wording found here and reword our article so someone doesn't think a copyvio has occurred. 70.72.201.229 (talk) 04:31, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Some rewording needed
Talk:The Peter Serafinowicz Show

message: This show will be starting next week, why delete the article?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Sepmix (talk • contribs) 12:51, 24 September 2007
What happened to this show? Was it dropped after 4 episodes?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joelittlejohn (talk • contribs) 00:01, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No it aired all six episodes as planned. Gran2 15:43, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why does this article have a ratings section?  It looks like it's only there to illustrate the fact that the show's ratings slowly fell over the weeks.  Purple Paint 18:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ratings 
Talk:Thrill Me: The Leopold & Loeb Story

message: INFOBOX:  Someone keeps changing the Correct info box listing which says Based on the Leopold & Loeb True Crime Story. To the INCORRECT, based on the Leopold & Loeb Murders (plural).    Leopold & Loeb didn't commit murderS.  They killed ONE young boy (horribly.)    THRILL ME is about the relationship and how it led to a SINGLE MURDER.  Why does it keep being changed and made incorrect?
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.243.172.80 (talk • contribs) 
:If, instead of reverting to whatever version you think is the "right" version, you took a moment to notice that the infobox was changed to "Leopold and Loeb murder", we wouldn't have this issue.  —  MusicMaker5376 18:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, "Leopold and Loeb murder" sounds like they were the victims, not the perpetrators. Why not just leave it at based on "Leopold and Loeb," period? ConoscoTutto 13:27, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:WLTJ

message: it reads somewhat like marketing content.  also, what exactly is "beautiful music"? Benwing (talk) 05:09, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Beautiful Music" was the actual name of an American radio format at one time; sometimes it was called "Easy Listening" - no peacocks here! Radiopathy •talk•   20:05, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  tone of article? "beautiful music"?
Talk:West Side Story (Original Broadway Cast)

message: Something is puzzling about the stated release date of October, 1957. Namely that it didn't reach Billboard's Top Pop Album chart until the March 17, 1958 issue, almost 5 months later. By contrast, the original cast recording of The Music Man was released Jan. 20, 1958, and made the Top LP chart in the Feb. 24 issue, only 5 weeks later. Was the public really ignoring West Side Story for months? Or was it actually released later, like maybe early February, 1958? A topic for further research. PatConolly (talk) 05:38, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 10:58, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: West Side Story (Original Broadway Cast) →  – Shouldn't West Side Story be the only thing italicized? I'll admit, I don't know if the "Original Broadway Cast" is part of the title. Saturdayopen (talk) 04:49, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:46, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 May 2021
Talk:Greater Eston

message: "The area, with the addition of Ormesby, is designated by the ONS as the Eston and South Bank urban subdivision of the Teesside urban area, which according to the 2001 census had a population of 32,788".  Due to new definitions and classifications in urban areas, the Eston & Southbank urban subdivision is now defunct.  Urban areas are now referred to as Built-up Areas and their subdivisions.  It now forms part of the Middlesbrough Built-up Area subdivision (or BUASD) of the Teesside Built-up Area.  This new built-up area has a population of 174,700 Acklamite (talk) 18:13, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ONS Eston and South Bank urban subdivision
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Recurring dreams

message: User:Recurring_dreams
      run at Mon Sep 24 13:33:31 2007 GMT
Image:			2
Mainspace		3685
Portal:			1
Talk:			257
Template talk:		23
Template:		16
User talk:		1644
User:			241
Wikipedia talk:		23
Wikipedia:		521
avg edits per page	1.78
earliest	10:31, 10 August 2006
number of unique pages	3606
total			6413
2006/8 	39 	
2006/9 	1 	
2006/10 	0 	
2006/11 	41 	
2006/12 	230 	
2007/1 	340 	
2007/2 	176 	
2007/3 	72 	
2007/4 	583 	
2007/5 	651 	
2007/6 	869 	
2007/7 	1427 	
2007/8 	976 	
2007/9 	1008 	
Mainspace
41	Kevin Rudd
35	Matraville Public School
32	Sajeeb Wazed
29	List of Australian television series
26	Andrew Hansen
25	The Chaser
24	Bob Carr
24	Tim Blair
22	Barker College
22	The Chaser's War on Everything
21	Kristina Keneally
21	John Howard
20	Chas Licciardello
18	New South Wales Premier's Literary Awards
18	New Zealan
Talk:
11	Narendra Modi
11	Sajeeb Wazed
9	John Howard
8	Kevin Rudd
8	Religion of Peace
6	Islam
6	The Sydney Morning Herald
5	Australian general election, 2007
5	Tony Catanzariti
5	Tim Blair
5	Tim Flannery
4	University of New South Wales
4	Tony Blair
3	Peter Garrett
3	Tourism in Sydney
Image:
2	SydTech.JPG
 	 
Template:
8	Australian Nobel laureates
5	News & Current Affairs in Australia
2	AusPoliticsTasks
Template talk:
20	Did you know
2	In the news
User:
95	Recurring dreams
45	Recurring dreams/Sandbox
25	Recurring dreams/Userboxes
21	Recurring dreams/monobook.js
18	Recurring dreams/Helpful
13	Recurring dreams/Sandbox2
5	Recurring dreams/Menu
4	Recurring dreams/Contributions
3	Recurring dreams/Clock
2	Joshg2 04
2	Recurring dreams/Userboxes/Sydney Grammar School
User talk:
52	Recurring dreams
7	Lancastria
7	Michellecrisp
5	Petrosian63
5	Lucid
5	220.225.21.226
5	Timeshift9
5	Blu3d
5	Prester John
4	Desperatehousewives
4	DaGizza
4	121.44.121.79
4	Mh12
4	220.237.41.141
3	202.191.103.44
Wikipedia:
74	Administrator intervention against vandalism
43	WikiProject Deletion sorting/Australia
18	In the news section on the Main Page/Candidates
16	Australian Wikipedians' notice board
12	Press coverage
9	Help desk
7	Articles for deletion/List of schools in Geelong
6	Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
6	Articles for deletion/Blitz (magazine)
6	Reference desk/Science
5	Requests for page protection
5	Articles for deletion/Bored of Studies
5	WikiProject Australian politics
4	Articles for deletion/Aussie cheer
4	Articles for deletion/Eamon McDonnell
Wikipedia talk:
9	WikiProject Australian politics
6	WikiProject Australia
2	WikiProject Bangladesh
2	AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage
2	WikiProject Sikhism
User's contributions using  wannabe kate tools. Carlosguitar 13:38, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Wireless local loop

message: This article needs to be totally rewritten. Can someone please pitch in? 207.171.167.101 13:36, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

message: The Wireless Internet service provider (WISP) page seems to overlap with this one. It might be useful to clarify the relationship between the two. guanxi (talk) 19:51, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship between WLL and [[Wireless Internet service provider]]?
Talk:HTT Pléthore

message: The engine is a tweaked Covettes Zr1 Engine 
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/04/sema-2009-htt-plethore-lc-750-yet-another-ambitious-supercar-s/
AutoMoose (talk) 15:23, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Engine

message: Shouldn't this article have a performance section i.e. 0-100km/h 2.8 seconds top speed over 200mph
http://www.worldcarshows.org/chilling-performance-htt-plethore-lc-750-supercar
How did I do this...
 AutoMoose (talk) 15:25, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Performance

message: I think that's Luc, the car's creator in the photo (the bald guy in the background). But I didn't ask so I'm not sure... Oaktree b (talk) 03:55, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Luc

message: >>
Chartrand claims that production will begin sometime late this year, with a price tag of around $600,000 for the standard, 750-hp version and close to $1m for the 1,300-hp variant. Bold claims, but Chartrand isn't stopping there. "I want to design a helicopter next. It's my other love."
<<
I think this could be added, it was all was copied from 
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/04/sema-2009-htt-plethore-lc-750-yet-another-ambitious-supercar-s/
AutoMoose (talk) 15:23, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Other

message: Isn't the first Canadian supercar the Bricklin SV-1 ? -- 76.65.129.3 (talk) 05:47, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "first"
Talk:Bishop of Hereford's Bluecoat School

message: Ashley and Shaftesbury both appear to be named after the same person, Lord Ashley, who later became the Earl of Shaftesbury, or do I have the wrong person, and if so for which one? ~ Scribble Monkey 13:40, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The houses are named after separate people  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pjames37 (talk • contribs) 12:56, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, but is this either Ashley or Shaftesbury? Do you know which two people they are? ~ Scribble Monkey (talk) 15:50, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Houses

message: Please can someone add some detail to make this section more relevant. Are head pupils appointed by the head teacher or elected by their peers? What are their responsibilities and duties? I'm afraid I will delete the section if it cannot provide more information. ~ Scribble Monkey (talk) 20:27, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Head pupils
Talk:DDR Motorsport

message: --  I re-added a bit of info that seems to have been removed by an IP from the Dominican (hmm).  The first thing was that DDR moved from DR to the US to be able to work closer to their US parters.  this seems to be true, based on DDR's website info, and info provided in magazine info on DDR.  the second thing i readded was that the Blue DDR SP4 is the only DRR believed to exist.  this seems to be true, as all of DDRs images are of the same car, and Diego, nor DDR have shown any evidence of a subsequent build. Impreziv 06:38, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Luck (short story)

message: WhAT IS THE MORAL OR THEME OF THE ESSAY?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.11.183.54 (talk) 13:52, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Won't try to respond to "Theme" at this time. But might this be the basis for the George MacDonald Fraser's "Flashman?" Rlhemenez (talk) 02:57, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Straight-twin engine

message: The BMW i3 electric car uses a parallel twin engine as a range extender.  
The add on is called the REx and is same/similar as a BMW C600 Sport and C650GT scooter engine.
Idyllic press (talk) 17:22, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional use 

message: (This post kind-of follows the "Parallel Twin" post above).
I think the paragraph (in italics, below), from the  Terminology section is wrong. There is no difference between a parallel twin and a vertical twin. It is NOT a question of their crankshaft angles. One simply describes an engine as a 360°,180°, 270° parallel-twin (or vertical twin).
"In the United Kingdom, the term "parallel-twin" is traditionally used for engines with a crankshaft angle of 360 degrees, since the two pistons are in the same direction (i.e. parallel to each other).[citation needed] "Vertical-twin" was used to describe engines with a crankshaft angle of 180 degrees,[citation needed] which causes the pistons to travel in opposite directions. The terms "straight-twin" and "inline-twin" were used more generically for any crankshaft angle."  Arrivisto (talk) 12:46, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology
Category talk:Novels by Neal Stephenson

message: This should probably be a subcategory of Books by Neal Stephenson. MFNickster 14:50, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not all novels are delivered as books. In fact they are different things. Novel is a literary form. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 15:18, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Nasser Najiri Amtiri

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 14:03, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{tl|npov}} tag as per dispute on [[Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption]] 

message: The image that i have removed from the article violates the basic rules of Wikipedia. It is the own work of a Wikipedia editor who took a primary source combined it with other sources and then interpreted it in the image description. This is a violation of WP:OR. The fact that these are mostly primary sources has also further problems as it does not comply with the policies of BLP's of living people. So i see this topic as taken to the talk page and the image should not be re-included until consensus has been reached. IQinn (talk) 08:07, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: explanation...

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 21:22, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Another useful source is the The Guantanamo Docket. It is an interactive database provided and updated by the New York Times. The database is searchable and has the Pentagon documents (CSRT and ARB) included. Additional documents and reliable New York Times research regarding the detainees at Guantanamo are also provided. This is the link to the documents and research regarding Nasser Najiri Amtiri. IQinn (talk) 09:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rough work 

message: This article is one of a series that had a number of valid and useful wikilinks removed with an edit summary "unlink interpretation of questionable source".
I don't think this is a sufficient explanation, and I don't think this removal of wikilinks was a good idea.
I think the wikilinks should be restored to this article and the other articles.  Geo Swan (talk) 21:22, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Already explained and under discussion here and in a related discussion here. I have told you that and i have ask you multiple times in a friendly way to continue the discussions and to answer my questions. here and here and on other places. I think your behavior is disruptive. I would appreciate if you could answer the questions and continue started discussions. Thank you. IQinn (talk) 09:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  removal of valid and useful wikilinks
Talk:Teesside Development Corporation

message: Given that the TDC was headquartered in Middlesbrough and was for the whole of Teesside why then has the Stockton Template been added?
Stuffed cat (talk) 15:02, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Reference is made to 'distinctive statues' - more information? Jackiespeel (talk) 18:34, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Statues
Talk:Omar Rajab Amin

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 14:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{tl|npov}} tag as per dispute on [[Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption]]
Talk:Ganim

message: Joseph Ganim 
Why no article about Bridgeport's convicted mayor?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.10.198.105 (talk) 19:23, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mohammed Nechle

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption. Geo Swan 14:24, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{tl|npov}} tag as per dispute on [[Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption]] 
Talk:Alliance for Natural Health

message: This artice seems to have been written from a non-neutral point of view. There is plenty of factual and referenced content, such as the information on the failed legal challenges, but the fundamental issue is never confronted: that the organisation campaigns for potent drugs to be sold without regulation if they are arbitrarily designated "natural".
(Or, alternatively, that the organisation campaigns for ineffective substances to be sold without regulation.) Steve Graham (talk) 16:15, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: To support your POV and enable you to add content to this effect, you will need appropriate references per WP:V. Otherwise, your assertions will contravene WP:NOR. Vitaminman (talk) 12:41, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: "The ANH runs campaigns in favor of dietary supplements, "sustainable healthcare", and traditional medicinal cultures..."
"Speaking at the inaugural "Scientific Research in Homoeopathy" conference held by the Complementary Medical Association..."
Nice sneer-quotes!
We get it, we get it! There is NO SUCH THING as sustainable healthcare, and there is NO SUCH THING as scientific research in homeopathy.
Point made!
50.141.12.130 (talk) 14:43, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Marches On 

message: It is the same organization with some of the same topics.  Editing both ot these is likely to lead to old or mis-information on one or the other article. Also, citations are needed. Akrasia25 (talk) 20:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Weak oppose; it seems that the US organization is quite active, and acting quite independently on many issues. Their websites are distinct, and it seems sufficient on Wikipedia to keep the pages well-linked. Klbrain (talk) 19:57, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[:Alliance for Natural Health USA]] with [[:Alliance for Natural Health]]
Talk:Emad Abdalla Hassan

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 14:28, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{tl|npov}} tag as per dispute on [[Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption]]

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 20:38, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: rough work
Talk:Food manufacturing

message: Good people, I think this article should be retitled "The Industrialization of Food" or "Food Industrialization."  That phrase has far more currency among scholars of food.  Please comment.  Cheers, and happy eating, --Smilo Don 14:29, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename?  Industrialization of food? 

message: The article title & 'see also food processing' suggest this topic is separate and distinct from food processing.  Then the article content is all about food processing.  Just less than the food processing article.  Less information.  Less (no) sources. Gab4gab (talk) 17:08, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  delete or merge with Food processing
Talk:Heartbeats (The Knife song)

message: *Support - José González' version was a cover of this song and Heartbeats (song) basically contains the same information as Heartbeats. Chappy  TC 14:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay so I've moved the little information from Heartbeats (song) and put it on this page and created a redirect. Jack 16:36, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: Is it worth noting that this song has been sampled by the underground rap group, Get Busy Committee? It samples the beat and the hook.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emp395 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sampled
Talk:Kallawaya

message: Talk:Kallawayas →  – The talk page needs to match the main page. -Uyvsdi (talk) 20:59, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This is an uncontroversial request. List it in that section and an admin will do it within a day. Rennell435 (talk) 02:23, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Reference 6 is just a travel website not mentioning anything related -at least in the link provided- to support the statement which refers to.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.244.1.78 (talk) 15:59, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Man, Ivory Coast

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Departments of Côte d'Ivoire which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 18:00, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:KLM Flight 633

message: Hi, I noticed that the approximate time given for the take off ("about 2.30") was missing a leading zero, to indicate it was 0230AM, which I edited. Also, does anyone know if that was UTC, or local time etc? It would be nice to have it specified. Thanks :) Oliver 60.234.251.100 06:21, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it was in Winter, in Ireland, I guess local time was the same as UTC. Averell (talk) 09:27, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Times