Talk:I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry

message: I heard yesterday the rating's being appealed from R to PG-13. Is the R rating official now?ChesterG 18:32, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Guess not. ChesterG 12:21, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appeal 

message: I have an objection to the use of "LGBT comedy film" in the lede. I won't deny the film is LGBT-ish, but LGBT comedy implies that one or more of the major characters is actually L, G, B, or T. This is really more of a buddy comedy or a romantic comedy or both. I'll change it soon unless someone gives me a good reason not to. Polymathematics 17:01, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The entire movie centers on LGBT issues, and at least two major characters are gay, the big black fireman and the brother of their lawyer; also it's strongly implied that the main character's son is gay.  The movie features numerous cameos from prominent real-life LGBT celebrities.  It focuses on freedom and the hypocrisy of homophobes like the bigoted protester that Adam Sandler punches out.  This movie was meant to appeal to all audiences, but everything about it is LGBT related.  You would be flat out wrong in every way to change the lede.Rglong 23:41, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't call either the gay firefighter or the lawyer's gay brother "major characters."  As for the potentially gay son... there's a whole other set of problems there.  Exploding Boy (talk) 16:46, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: By the definition "contains a character that is LGBT" is frankly discriminatory, and would disallow movies in which straight characters deal with their feelings and potential prejudices against the LGBT community. Which is, frankly, not a good criterion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.166.192.44 (talk) 08:24, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  LGBT 

message: The entire plot section has been removed as a copyvio.  Exploding Boy 15:04, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: Is it just me, or did I see Michael Palin in the trailer?!? Curvebill 00:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WTF?!

message: Should you guys mention the cuts?  Like the "Homosexicals" or the "We're gay not transexuals".  Both were taken out of the film, even though they are still present in the commercials.  Xihix 02:37, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cuts from film

message: I added a section on Rotten Tomatoes and divided it from the LGBT and Catholics' opinions, which are hardly objective and neutral.  The LGBT organizations were commenting on how well LGBT people and issues were represented in the film, which is worth noting, but is still not a movie review.  The Catholics, let's face it, are against gay people - they would find any movie portraying homosexuality in any way to be "morally offensive" (I remember when Brokeback came out, the reviewer gave it high marks because he felt it was a beautiful film, but then they forced him to change it to "O" for offensive because, well, God hates fags, right?).  And anyway, no matter what this movie is about, the Catholic reviewers never use standard movie criticism in reviewing movies, they use an arbitrary scale of what might offend touchy people.  Hardly objective.  Long story short, critical and social reaction are entirely different things and deserve their own categories.  I didn't have time to put a proper footnote on the Rotten Tomatoes, and I also wanted to add all the other standard sources Wikipedia normally uses, so if someone wants to toss that in there for me that would be great.Rglong 17:28, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But don't you wish real movie reviewers would use the word "fisticuffs" more often? --76.202.58.220 19:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Critical vs. social reaction: a definite NPOV issue

message: Can someone explain why this article is included in WikiProject Judaism? --Davidstrauss 05:15, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because one of them (either Chuck or Larry, can't remember which) is Jewish in the movie and there is significant portrayal of Jewish wedding themes. 90.197.38.191 (talk) 04:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Judaism? 

message: Was an official Soundtrack released for this film? It seems likely, seeing as Queen's songs were used...
If so, a section needs to be created for it. Fultron89 (talk) 19:58, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Soundtrack?

message: The second to last paragraph of the plot (and the sentence preceding it) suffer from terrible grammar problems. I haven't seen the movie myself so I cannot correct what I don't understand, but I would appreciate if someone would take a look at it. 
:Soon the city agent Clinton Fitzer play basket ball with Tori and Eric ask that Chuck should spent time with his Family and ask where he is. Tori mentions that Chuck is hanging out with Alex who he always talk about whenever Larry is not around and he is shocked to hear this
:Larry confronts Chuck about his spending time with Alex. Larry said that if Chuck was around then the city agent would believe that Chuck like him soon Chuck and Larry argue Chuck said he had to lied to him because of it now had to lie to everybody especially Alex he was unable to be honest with her or get close to her or have fun with her then Larry ask why he could not had fun with him Chuck said he change ever since Larry force him to marry him saying he does act like his husband and unable to breath Larry said that only reason he feel that way because he was afraid feeling trap that what happen when get marry Chuck respond they are not really saying he just in a gay nightmare Larry reply he can not commit to anything and try make it work Chuck said it did and became work and then relationship become work Chuck tell Larry to Face it they are not suppose to be together and found someone he really be with and tell instead being jealous he should the same but Larry repllie to for in the love Paula Chuck reply he should just move on because his house is like a Shrine to Paula and he should just get a real wife while his kid would lie to every 2 second Larry respond he can not hold it for five minute it the reason this mess Chuck respond he know real reason why they are in this mess and said unable to deal with and Larry leaves but soon reconcile
Crusoe704 (talk) 16:37, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Ouch I wish I did not read that now my head hurt. - SummerPhD (talk) 17:33, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar problems

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080430142942/http://www.nypost.com/seven/07202007/entertainment/movies/fdnwhy__movies_kyle_smith.htm to http://www.nypost.com/seven/07202007/entertainment/movies/fdnwhy__movies_kyle_smith.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120103224342/http://www.nypress.com/article-16861-bosom-buddies.html to http://www.nypress.com/article-16861-bosom-buddies.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070826172419/http://www.afterelton.com/movies/2007/7/chuckandlarryreview to http://www.afterelton.com/movies/2007/7/chuckandlarryreview
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified