Talk:The unanswerable questions

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: I've blanked the page for the moment, as it's called 14 ... but actually lists only 11. I'll see if I can find out. Peter jackson (talk) 10:22, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsense 

message: Dear Author, 
you said,“The world exists dependent on causes and conditions—ignorance, craving and hatred. When ignorance, craving, and hatred are present, the world exists; when they are not present, the world ceases to exist.” 
Then how do ignorance, craving, and hatred exist? Does it then suggest they are something external to the world? Are they conditioned?
thanks!
P.S: btw i think your "implications" section is VERY well explained = )
--Nekkhamma (talk) 13:19, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question for the author only

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on The unanswered questions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ymba.org/bns/bnsframe.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:06, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on The unanswered questions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130329025311/http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn12/sn12.015.than.html to http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn12/sn12.015.than.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:06, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There seems to be a complete lack of understanding of WP concepts both in the article and in this talk.
A WP article reports verifiable facts and qualified opinions to inform people about specific topics. The first part of the article is fine, but the "Implications" are obviously provided by an author who is not even identified let alone demonstrably qualified. This is the sort of personal commentary that has flooded the web. But WP tries to provide a higher quality than this.
As for attempting to answer the questions (or quote Kant), as suggested in the talk, it demonstrates a complete lack of grasp of why the Buddha avoided such topics, suggesting that the article hasn't fulfilled its aim. It's fine if you are conducting a class in Western Philosophy but not if you are trying to grasp Buddhism--which presumably most visitors to the page are.
--50.68.134.51 (talk) 18:06, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP rules? 

message: The page is fine as it is now: the list of the "silly" questions only, without unsourced pseudocommentary. 
Pruning this puffery was supprisingly a commendable and meritorius act. Zezen (talk) 15:04, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 17:37, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  No commentary is good 

message: It looks so. But I'm not a specialist and not sure how they relate. Maybe the questions stayed unanswered exactly because catuṣkoṭi logic system happened to be wrong? Or… Could somebody find sources and clarify how they are related? Grv87 (talk) 01:23, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The unanswered questions contain the examples of [[Catuṣkoṭi]], don't they?