lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Categorization progress

message: This is based on Template:Wikification progress. Please feel free to update it. Salad Days 20:17, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Given the discussion at WT:CAT about whether articles with sorted type categories are "categorised" or not, wouldn't it be preferable to count the "uncat" and the "uncatstub" totals separately?  If nothing else, for morale reasons, given that there's a huge "hidden" backlog of stub-category-only articles lurking out there.  Alai 00:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Uncategorised" semantics 

message: I am wondering if something has changed in the timing of method in which articles are being tagged as being uncategorized?
The following is a count of articles in the :Category:Uncategorized from December 2007 
:*As of Dec 24 - 8462 articles left to go 
:*As of Dec 21 - 947 articles left to go 
:*As of Dec 12 - 752 articles left to go 
:*As of Dec 4 - 200 articles left to go 
There was a huge jump between Dec 21 and Dec 24 and the count increase prior to that seems slower than usual.
For a short historical listing of how the numbers have changed over the past few months see my user page: User:Dbiel/Uncategorized History 
It is nice to see that for the first time the only tagged uncategorized articles are in the current month of December, all previous months have been cleared. But at the same time it is disappointing to see the huge jump in the number of tagged articles.
Dbiel (Talk) 01:46, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Via the special page, it's every three days.  However, I tend to periodically (if not to say, sporadically) run larger bot-tagging batches from either the db dumps, which tend to be every two months or so, or from toolserver queries, which could be done as often as desired (at least up to the point where the toolserver admins get ticked off about this hogging the job queue too often).  Alai (talk) 23:26, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has there been a change in the way articles are being tagged? 

message: Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Categories/uncategorized#Is_the_template_obsolete_now.3F and reply there, thanks. ~EdGl ★ 17:15, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this template obsolete?
Talk:Ramair

message: Back in 1994 when I started at Bradford, I considered joining Ramair.  I didn't but one interesting fact they told me is that they were the first student radio station to legally broadcast on FM.  During the year, they had two one-month licences to broadcast.  I'll add this to the article anyway, but can anyone actually cite a source for this and add any facts (such as when this first happened)? 
Guinness 20:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It happened before that point as I remember listening to ramir on FM as a sixth former, and I'd left Bradford by 1993. Secretlondon 13:44, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unconfirmed facts
Talk:20 to 1: Hits and Misses

message: I am not aware if the John Drummond referred to in the article is the American athlete Jon Drummond or someone else entirely. Either way it needs changing by someone in "the know", as it will shortly point to a disambiguation page which is in the process of being created. 
Cheers! 
Philip Cross 20:22, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Drummond (athlete) 

message: The individual episode articles for 20 to 1 are now being reviewed according to episode notability guidelines.  Please contribute to the discussion on Talk:20 to 1#Episode review. Thanks. -- Ned Scott 04:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  episode article review notice
Talk:Southern Indiana Toll Road

message: It's been several years since the Southern Indiana Toll Road was proposed, so it's no longer a particularly significant issue. I believe it can be merged into the Interstate 69 in Indiana very easily since much of the information in this article is already contained in that one. Indyguy (talk) 03:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me... it shouldn't take more than a paragraph or two to talk about how tolling was considered for part of the road.  The stuff about how they would have collected tolls, etc is irrelevantFroo (talk) 17:07, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Actually, in reading over the Interstate 69 in Indiana and the Southern Indiana Toll Road articles, it should only take a sentence or two.  Naerly all the relevant information in 2013 is duplicated there.Froo (talk) 17:11, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

text: merged Epicgenius (talk) 13:50, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:Julia Cameron

message: A source is need for Cameron's birth date and place. No source is given in the article so the information is suspect until confirmed. Softlavender (talk) 05:29, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind -- it's in her memoir. Softlavender (talk) 14:41, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for Cameron's birth date and place? 
Talk:Artist residency

message: Hi  
The references are not notable for a global encyclopedia.  They're all in the USA and 3 are in Texas, which is not a world centre for art.  Of the links listed:
ArtPace in SanAntonio, TX  - No wikipedia entry for the institution
The Core Program in Houston, TX  - One paragraph wikipedia entry for the institution
The Chinati Foundation in Marfa, TX - No wikipedia entry for the institution
Skowhegan in Skowhegan, ME - Wikipedia entry marked as an advertisement
These are not notable programmes, and so I have deleted them.  Feel free to replace these links with world notable programmes. StopItTidyUp 20:35, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The list just needed to be expanded, not deleted.  Tag it for not having a global perspective if you have a problem with it.  These are all well known, respected programs, and I wish I had time to document press coverage, but I don't.  Not having a wikipedia entry doesn't mean something doesn't meet notability requirements.  Art entries on wikipedia in general are VERY sparse anyway.  And residencies are mostly non-profit programs offering great resources to artists.  I listed the reputable programs that I know living in Texas and being an art professional, hoping that others would list good residencies they know and it would become a really nice resource for artists.  Paul Slocum 21:13, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Due to almost total subject overlap, artist in residence should be merged with artist residency. —  AjaxSmack  14:10, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the terminology artist in residence is more appropriate for a search for a specific artist. Inquiries about the subject of artist residency programs would be more easily accessed using these terms. —  C3P  17:42, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge articles
Talk:13th Aviation Regiment (United States)

message: This makes no sense.  Why would you want to delete a page about a US Army unit.
– not to mention the largest uav training center in the world.
I'm just curious as to when the unit's going to find out it's the 210th Aviation instead of UASTB. So far as everyone in the unit's tracking, we still are the 1/UASTB. 72.201.112.8 (talk) 17:36, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 2010 comments
Talk:French hood

message: Many thanks to PKM for starting this page. It was very much needed, but the information I had was fragmentary at best.  — AnnaKucsma   (Talk to me!) 20:52, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome! - PKM 18:26, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:A unit

message: The article says
[…] with a driving cab and a control system to control other locomotives in a multiple unit, and therefore able to be the lead unit in a consist of several locomotives controlled from a single position., which suggests that such a consist is a multiple unit, but the article on multiple unit disagrees: Locomotives utilising multiple-unit train control are not multiple units. Is one of the articles wrong? Or is this only seemingly a contradiction? (How so?) BlaueBlüte (talk) 04:16, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple unit
Talk:Wi-Fi Alliance

message: whats range for wi-fi.????
and does it uses radio waves???
:This question is perhaps best put in the Answers pages here. But, nonetheless, some comment. Range depends on quite a few things, including the emitted power of the WiFi circuits (there is a regulatory maximum in all locations -- though it's not quite the same maximum everywhere), the directionality of the antennas used, the losses imposed on the signal by obstructions in direct line of sight and indirectly in the Fresnel zone, air temperature, humidity, etc. The maximum possible under the least interference with the strongest signal output is several miles. In practice, with the common omnidirectional antennas (e.g., the rubber ducky ones), the maximum distance is a couple of hundred feet. Note that, as signal strength is reduced, WiFi units back off on the modulations used and so reduce the data rate. In general, the data rate at max range (and minimum signal strength) will be low. 
:WiFi does use radio signals. 802.11a in the 5GHz range and 802.11 b/g/n in the 2.4GHz range. The latter are close in frequency to that used by microwave ovens. Note that the modulations used are far more complex than AM radio, FM radio, or shortwave radio. WiFi signals can't be meaningfully decoded by ordinary radios, including scanners and such. ww 04:47, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Range

message: Before hiring Interbrand in 1999 to come up with the term Wi-Fi what name did this organization go by? 64.228.88.84 (talk) 17:05, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Original name

message: The group of companies included 3Com, Aironet (acquired by Cisco), Harris Semiconductor (now Intersil), Lucent (now Alcatel-Lucent), Nokia[serial comma needed?] and Symbol Technologies (now Motorola).
The mergers are so complex and variegated it would take ten minutes of intense study to determine whether adding the serial comma is a correct edit.  [Edit: For clarity, the issue here is the scope of the modifier "(now Motorola)".] — MaxEnt 23:25, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serial comma question mark 

message: Vu  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.107.192.80 (talk) 11:10, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vu 

message: Hi there are 105.184.106.246 (talk) 16:48, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  This 222
Talk:Eastern District of the Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod

message: I am removing the extended list of congregations & missions.  I certainly see the value of an article on a middle judicatory for a major american denomination, but not for the directory style list. Athanasius • Quicumque vult  18:39, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:NOTDIR]] 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 22:29, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Support - The names should be consistent with the main article. Indyguy (talk) 17:41, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 September 2023
Talk:Jim Burt (American football)

message: Ashlee Burt, Jim Burt, Sr's daughter plays soccer at the University of Miami.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.153.162.139 (talk) 22:59, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm pretty sure Jim Burt scored at least one touchdown during his career with the Giants that should be mentioned. 98.13.71.185 (talk) 20:07, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Touch down!
Talk:Concepción (volcano)

message: I added information about the formation and the base of the volcano. I added resources from this journal: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00445-002-0256-8  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannahlampo (talk • contribs) 18:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled 
Talk:J. Stuart Russell

message: What a great entry...great job guys!!  This article will likely prove to be an excellent resource for many Bible and history students!! --Virgil Vaduva 21:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great job  

message: I've added an 'inappropriate tone' tag to this article. The text appears to be verifiable for the most part (although i haven't checked), but it is littered with opinions and has a very aggrandising, non-neutral tone. One sentence that stood out to me as particularly comical is this one:
He bore his sufferings, to the admiration of attendants and medical advisers, with a manly and even cheerful patience, upheld by his Christian faith.
I don't think it's the job of an encyclopaedia to determine the 'manliness' of a person.
Here are a few other statements that clearly have a non-neutral tone:
He was gifted with winning personal characteristics, which secured for him a devoted following.
His advocacy of the good cause was in frequent demand for meetings in London and the suburbs.
Russell was not only an able preacher, but also a man of kindly deportment.
This work, a rare specimen of serious exposition and logical acumen, drew much attention to the subject on both sides of the Atlantic.
These are only a handful of examples; the entire article really needs to be re-done because it reads like it was written by a relative or a follower of his. On top of that, nothing in the article has citations.
75.173.160.25 (talk) 15:48, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate tone 

message: It does not appear that the Spurgeon review is contained in the "Sword and Trowel" as contained in the Scribd version of the 1878 archive (http://www.scribd.com/doc/23319484/Spurgeon-Charles-Sword-and-Trowel-Vol-5). Recommend deleting the review from the page unless this can be substantiated by another source. As it is, it is highly suspect. Jamesmetzger (talk) 04:36, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spurgeon review verifiable?
Talk:Dawlish railway station

message: I have updated the picture. The old picture was a better picture in its own right but failed to include the station itself. I think we need to have the station in the picture on the station article. --MarkS (talk) 21:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: I'd guess there must have been some casualties. Any details? Valetude (talk) 01:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the event entry at The Railways Archive, there were 0 fatalities, 2 injured. The text of the report says (para. 3) "Two passengers subsequently complained of shock or minor injuries." --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:37, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  1921 accident
Talk:Josef Joffe

message: Would an interview with Josef Joffe from 1987 be useful here as an external link? Focus of conversation is nuclear weapons policy. http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_6984B787C0BC4119B40981BDC0AB1094 (I helped with the site, so it would be conflict of interest for me to just add it.) Mccallucc (talk) 20:18, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link to interview on nuclear policy? 

message: In order to avoid BLP violations, I think we need sources that clearly provide context, preferably with some analysis. Otherwise we have nothing that demonstrates this comment by Joffe is any more noteworthy than anything else he has ever said. The sources so far have been poor, where context is specifically removed. That's simply sensationalism that I don't believe has any place in this encyclopedia, let alone in a BLP. --Ronz (talk) 05:00, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Trump quote

message: O.k., today. - But in March, 1944 - ? Amnesia ? --213.172.123.242 (talk) 18:15, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Born in Poland ?
Talk:List of corvette and sloop classes of the Royal Navy

message: The naval sloop originated in the mid 17th century, so many vessels in this category served in the Royal Navy before the advent of steam power in the mid 19th century, comprising a number of 'classes' of sloop built to a common design, as well as numerous vessels built to individual designs ('classes of one vessel', in effect). This list could run to many hundreds of ships - and I should be interested to learn if colleagues felt it should comprise listings of sloop classes as well as listings of individual sloops.
The term 'corvette' was not introduced into the Royal Navy until the 1830s; until that date all small Sixth Rates (below 28 guns) were defined as 'post ships', while unrated vessels were all classes as 'sloops-of-war'. 20th century terminology had, of course, very different meanings. The terms 'frigate' and (from the 1830s) 'corvette' both continued in official use through the introduction of steam power, and lasted until 1887 when both terms were replaced by the new term 'cruiser'.
Rif Winfield 19:30, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sailing warships - sloops-of-war
Talk:Li Ka Shing Foundation

message: Often, the article cites: "Mr. Li Ka Shing considers..." or "Mr. Li Ka Shing understands" etc... which need to be reworded and often cited Those words 03:35, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  citations and "Mr. Li Ka Shek" 

message: An illegal Nigerian Advance Fee Scam gang has begun as of July 2016 (first sighting 11 July) using this article to promote one of those types of scams.  Usual practice is to put a link to this article in the email, thus trying to say it is from this foundation, which Nigerian Advance Fee fraud scams are never from.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:500:D01:A0CB:61AD:F98:C6F9 (talk) 17:02, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Ditto as of now. Actually this time along with the article about Li Ka Shing. Shanen (talk) 10:17, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misuse of Article to Promote Nigerian Advance Fee Scam (419) July 2016
Talk:The Irish Catholic

message: * I agree with you that this page has serious verifiability problems; the way to address this is to remove all assertions that do not have reputable, independent sources provided to back them up (see WP:CITE). At the moment, the only sourced facts in the "1990s" section are that Simon Rowe resigned as editor in 2004. All the other stuff about Herman Kelly, Gary O'Sullivan, Polish editions and competition from former editors is completely unsourced. Demiurge 22:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There seems to be no verifable reference to the claimed increase in circulation due to Mr kelly,s editorship. Also, the refrences to his previous writings are not refrenced. I,d suggest editing the page to stick with what is purelyl factual, namely:
Mr Rowe resigned as Editor
Mr Kelly acted as Acting Editor
Mr O,Sullivan was subsequently appointed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.77.0.223 (talk) 13:49, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hermann Kelly 
Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-06-06 Kenneth Montgomery Keillor

message: It should be clear to anyone reading the comments of Ken Keillor, that he is an unstable reprobate. This is a man who constantly uses his supposed Christianity in various forms of repugnant piety and one-up-manship. The length of his rebuttals do nothing to increase their quality, but as always, Mr. Keillor entertains.
:Please follow WP:NPA Computerjoe's talk 15:36, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Lisa Furukawa

message: I'm not sure exactly what Wikipedia wants me to do to edit Lisa's page properly...
I'm a fan of hers and I created this page and will be the one doing most of the updating and maintaining for it.
I also have obtained Lisa's full permission to do so.
The pictures on her profile are copyrighted by HER and I have also been given permission to use them on here.
If someone at Wikipedia can please contact me and let me know exactly what needs to be done to correct these error messages I keep getting, I would greatly appreciate it.
Thank you.
- RoninDH
I've started an info box you'll see more blanks were you can put information about her if you edit this article. I've also moved her from music to appropriate sub categories since if we put every musician in the main category music it would become very overpopulated. If you need help with this article go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography Irate velociraptor 08:32, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Drummond (arts administrator)

message: *Needs to be merged with the other John Drummond (arts administrator) article. Williamb 19:03, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone ahead and moved that history to Talk:John Drummond (arts administrator)/Merge so it is accessible to everyone. Graham87 07:11, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rape pornography

message: Is it actually illegal anywhere to possess (i.e., in the same sense that child pornography is "illegal")? The page about Australia suggests that just means it can't be broadcast. Mdwh 21:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Since it's ambiguously worded, unsourced, and unlikely to be true anyway in my opinion, I'm removing it. I'm also removing the following sentence, as there's no evidence how widely available this is. Mdwh 14:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legality 

message: I know there is pornography that depicts rape, but is there really a genre of "rape pornography"? Шизомби (talk) 23:22, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really a genre? 

message: This is what it says in the referred article.
Some made clear that the clips were fictional, but other sites had the word “real” in their titles. At least a few touted videos that he feared might show actual crimes.
--JamesPoulson (talk) 20:56, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internet section is about content depicting real acts 

message: - Dear Senior Editor and administrators, I am writing here to express my concerns about this article. The page was vandalized last week. It also needs a better quality introduction and to be expanded. I believe Rape pornography needs attention from an expert because of the nature of the topic and current state of the article. - User:Wikipedianuhai 14:09, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Vandalism happens.  In this case, it was a hit-and-run by the same anonymous user twice within a couple of hours.  That's unfortunate but normal for Wikipedia, and pretty rare for this article.  As for the introduction, what do you suggest be included?  It looks reasonable to me, but I'm far from an expert here. HalJor (talk) 18:46, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

text: I made changes with this edit. My advice for now is to not give WP:Undue weight to real rape. Rape pornography is a controversial subgenre of pornography and the vast majority of it is fake rape. That is why my edit switched the lead to be about simulated rape first. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 15:21, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

text: Additional change here. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 15:30, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

text: Thank you for the improvements, Flyer22 Frozen. - User:Wikipedianuhai 15:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: This article needs attention
Talk:Signal strength in telecommunications

message: Signal strength is in units of electric field strength, e.g. microvolts per meter, not per square meter.  I have changed the units everywhere, but I don't know if the numbers are correct.  The original author may have been confused by the fact that the power per unit area of a signal at a given frequency, in watts per square meter, is proportional to the square of the field, i.e. (V/m)^2. DMPalmer 21:41, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article states ".. the magnitude of the electric field ..." Should it not be rather amplitude of the electromagnetic wave? Or the average electric field over some number of wavelengths? Why would one want to measure the magnitude of an electric field at a point in space when the wave that you are trying to measure has a constantly varying electric field?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xylog (talk • contribs) 09:43, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electric Field?