Talk:Reflectance

message: This article is way too technical, full of scientific jargon and Greek characters.
Wikipedia is supposed to be for a lay audience, not just for people with Ph.D. degrees in math and physics. I can't make heads nor tails out of the jargon-filled explanations.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.91.176.10 (talk) 03:31, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too Technical 

message: I agree. Incidentally, the reference at the following link is surprisingly the only one I found that put experimental points on the Fresnel equations on a FLAT water surface!
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/2007JTECHA1049.1
I think it could be cited at the end of the sentence "That part of incident light that is reflected from a body of water is specular and is calculated by the Fresnel equations."
Yet, the sentence should be changed to : "The specular portion of incident light reflected from a body of water is calculated by the Fresnel equations."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.193.231.122 (talk) 05:09, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  IN RESPONSE TO REAL WORLD DATA 

message: Should the following be added? If so, where?
That part of incident light that is reflected from a body of water is specular and is calculated by the Fresnel equations. Fresnel reflection is directional and therefore does not contribute significantly to albedo which is primarily diffuse reflection. A graph showing the reflectivity of water vs. incident angle of can be seen at.  
A real water surface may be wavy. Reflectance assuming a flat surface as given by the Fresnel equations can be adjusted to account for waviness. A formula and graph for correction for waviness for two different wave energy spectrum definitions exists.  4.232.0.81 02:39, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  water reflectance 

message: This is currently the Reflectivity and Reflectance article -- it should say so right at the top.-69.87.202.60 11:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reflectance 

message: Reflectance vs. wavelength curves for aluminium (Al), silver (Ag), and gold (Au) metal mirrors
This is a nice graph; might be nice to also have it in the mirror article.  It would be of more general use if the bounds of visible light could be added.-69.87.202.60 11:52, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  metal mirrors 

message: This article is a good theoretical start, but needs a lot more real-world data.
Please add typical range of total visible-light reflectivity for ordinary mirrors (80%?), white paper (up to at least 90%?), other ordinary white surfaces, and ordinary black surfaces.  And spectral curves for all of those, too, from UV to IR, with the visible portion clearly marked.
And, links to great sources of such details.-69.87.202.60 11:59, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  data needed 

message: This seems to be the pure physics term/concept.  In dealing with light, much of the terminology is weighted by the response of the human eye to different colors (Lumens, for example).  What is the term for reflectance, weighted in the visible spectrum by the human visual response?  It should be at least mentioned in this article, and linked to.-69.87.204.232 11:26, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Photopic spectral responsivity (cf. Color vision#Physiology of color perception) --Adoniscik (talk) 00:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human eye 

message: *Colors
:70-80% White
:70-80% Light cream
:55-65% Light yellow
:45-50% Light green
:45-50% Pink
:40-45% Sky-blue
:40-45% Light grey
:25-35% Beige
:25-35% Yellow ocher
:25-35% Light brown
:25-35% Olive green
:20-25% Orange
:20-25% Vermilion red
:20-25% Medium grey
:10-15% Dark green
:10-15% Dark blue
:10-15% Dark red
:10-15% Dark grey
* Materials
:95% Mirror
:80% Plaster
:65-75% White enamel
:60-75% Glazed white tiles
:60% Maple
:60% Birch
:40% Light oak
:15-20% Dark oak
:15-20% Dark walnut
:15-40% Concrete
:5-25% Red brick
:2-10% Carbon-black
:6-8% Clear glass
*Lighting design
:60-90% Ideal Ceilings
:35-60% Ideal Walls
:30-50% Ideal Countertops
-69.87.203.133 01:04, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reflectance Table 

message: Link (1) is broken. 128.12.103.70 (talk) 15:45, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link 

message: I think the unit(s) of reflectivity must be mentioned. --Sylvestersteele (talk) 12:02, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Reflectivity is unitless. Stonemason89 (talk) 02:21, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reflectivity units 

message: i think i read somewhere that it's silver
but i think some other guys said it's rhodium
reflectivity is a function of frequency, we get that part
but if you have some standard light source, say sunlight at some place, then it's just a number  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.107.1.165 (talk) 20:57, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Rhodium is not particularly shiny. Silver is the shiniest metal when averaged across the entire visible spectrum, but it is exceeded in some parts of the spectrum by tin and aluminum. Stonemason89 (talk) 17:01, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  shiniest metal 

message: I'm not convinced that the distinction made in this article between "reflectivity" and "reflectance" is universal. I don't doubt that some authors define the terms that way, but unless all do the article should be less strongly worded. --Srleffler (talk) 03:24, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed; modified. Fgnievinski (talk) 20:39, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reflectivity vs reflectance 

message: This page is redirected from "absorptance", but doesn't mention it.  It does say "see also absorptivity", but the absorptivity page just says absorptivity means absorptance, which redirects here.  This page should at the very least give a definition of absorptance/absorptivity, and discuss how it relates to reflectivity. Either that or there should be a separate page.
Additionally, if anyone has a good idea of how the concepts of absorptance, reflectance and emissivity relate to the concept of albedo, it would be very helpful to update this page with some details.
125.7.18.1 (talk) 01:28, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absorptance/absorptivity/albedo 

message: Substituted at 01:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment