Talk:Effective stress

message: I'm starting a rewrite of this series, to be more consistent with a general 'discovery channel' level, and pretty pictures.  Zeizmic 14:49, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have the feeling this article is a bit unclear.  First Terzaghi's effective stress is introduced.
Then a very vague definition is introduced: "Stress causing displacement", "average stress carried by the soil skeleton". Later the effect of buoyancy is introduced in the discussion.  Then Darcy's law is introduced, and forces related to movement is discussed.   This is really a mixup of different things.
Terzaghi's effective stress is simply the normal stress corrected for buoyancy (archimedes law). (You can work that out simply by balancing the forces acting on the solid from the weight of the total column minus the weight of the
displaced pore fluid.)  However, it is assumed that there is zero frictional forces or any other forces involved in this force balance.  Furthermore, the effective stress concept is always specific to both the property we are after and the material itself; 1) The effective stress that causes volume strain is not necessarily the same effective stress that causes failure.  2) The effective stress is intimately linked to the material: it is a constitutive concept.  As an example of the second point: the effective stress regarding volume strain for an elastic material is not the same as a viscous material.  However, the form may be the same, i.e., a Biot like formulation:
effective stress = total stress - (fluid pressure)*(Beta)
where Beta depends on tons of stuff. It will though approach zero as the porosity approach zero, because than there is no more pore fluid to buoy up the solid.  As friction etc increases Beta will decrease as the pore fluid becomes more and more involved in other force (grain-water-grain)balances: Effective stress is a macroscopic static concept from upscaling the microscopic force balance.
However, Darcy's law and the rest of the discussion does not belong to the effective stress article.  Darcy's law is about the conservation of momentum of the pore fluid. (a similar law will apply for the matrix).  The interaction forces due to a relative velocity between the solid and fluid and phenomena such as fluidization and liquifaction are completely separate things.
PETRSCIENT (talk) 13:52, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maybe some more explicit definitions would help 

message: I added one, although I wasn't sure of the details.  a once-over by an expert would be good.  
I thought the pic was a good illustration of it.
OsamaBinLogin (talk) 20:15, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maybe an introduction would help 

message: Please define the variables in the equations! H? gamma?
129.170.241.32 (talk) 01:32, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Define variables! (and fix formula) 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Effective stress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060618044805/http://fbe.uwe.ac.uk:80/public/geocal/soilmech/stresses/stresses.htm to http://fbe.uwe.ac.uk/public/geocal/SoilMech/stresses/stresses.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060902060122/http://fbe.uwe.ac.uk:80/public/geocal/SoilMech/water/water.htm to http://fbe.uwe.ac.uk/public/geocal/SoilMech/water/water.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080530000118/http://home.tu-clausthal.de/~pcdj/publ/PRL96_058301.pdf to http://home.tu-clausthal.de/~pcdj/publ/PRL96_058301.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:56, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified