lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:White Pigeon, Michigan

message: The claim that White Pigeon is the oldest incorporated village in the state of Michigan seems a little dubious. First InfoMI is not a particularly reliable source, in many cases it merely copies information without attribution from other websites, including Wikipedia. http://www.usacitiesonline.com/micountywhitepigeon.htm is also not a particularly reliable source. Other current villages in the state also incorporated in 1837, such as Clinton, Lenawee County, Michigan -- without any more specific date provided, what is the basis for claiming precedence? And the claim appears to be based on the distinction of being incorporated after Michigan became a state. There are certainly many municipalities that incorporated prior to statehood, although it would take some work to determine whether any are villages. older ≠ wiser 14:55, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not from the area, so can not verify the history with additional references. Perhaps someone from the area could come up with additional and more reliable sources.--Doug talk 17:32, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 
Talk:Alleluia

message: what does this mean?  It's in the "lenten alleluia" paragraph of the Eastern churches section.  Of course the deacon serves on days wtih Alleluia.  And isn't the Liturgy of the Presanctified Gifts a "divine liturgy"? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 15:21, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  " the deacon does not serve on days with Alleluia" 

message: This is practically the same thing as Hallelujah. They should be merged.
--2601:643:8101:64E1:651A:113E:7F4D:DFE8 (talk) 18:55, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the WP:Lead section to conform with the actual contents of the article. Editor2020 (talk) 03:12, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Hallelujah]]?
Talk:Ambon (liturgy)

message: I'm trying to make sense of the division line between sanctuary and nave. There's some discussion of this in terms of the whole Pussy Riot controversy. Were they dancing in the nave or the sanctuary? Wikipedia does not seem to be entirely internally consistent on this TMLutas (talk)
:The eastern orthodox church architectural nomenclature is quite confusing, this is because the architecture has changed over the centuries, and there is an attempt to shoehorn old terms onto new architectural arrangements.  From the photos I've seen of the incident, it occurred in the nave, right before the sanctuary. The division line is the iconostasion itself. There is an attempt to call the slight protruding stylobate of the sanctuary that is past the iconostasion as the "solea" (walkway), but that protrusion is just an accommodation to secure in place the iconostasion and is not required. And, even if we admit to call the stylobate a solea, it would not be part of the area restricted for the clergy. The protruding center step (the bema = raised step) from the sanctuary is not delimited by the iconostasion, so that would be considered part of the sanctuary.  (By way of illustration, if the whole iconostasion were removed, then the entire elevated area (including the now sanctuary flooring edge of what was the stylobate) would be part of the sanctuary. I would note that the nave itself is properly restricted only to the faithful, but this is nearly universally unenforced, which is why this incident could occur. Tachypaidia (talk) 19:45, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  source for ambon being part of the sanctuary 
Template talk:Vacation

message: For users in the US or elsewhere in the English-speaking world where the word "vacation" is used instead of "holiday", I created this template as an alternative to Template:Holiday.  Enjoy!  Joie de Vivre T 18:06, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Enjoy the new template!

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Template:Holiday4. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 4#Template:Holiday4 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Template:Holiday4" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Template:Onvaccation and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 10#Template:Onvaccation until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  ~~ lol1VNIO🎌 (talk • contribs) 12:39, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Template:Onvaccation" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Last year you reverted my attempt to switch out the current aeroplane icon for a more neutral and less climate-hostile version – specifically :File:OOjs UI icon userInactive-ltr.svg, which is the icon for "Inactive User" in the WMF's official icon set. The reason you gave was that the new icon . I don't find the icon I added very difficult to understand: it's a sleepy face, conveying inactivity or resting. I also don't think it's factually correct that aeroplanes are "synonymous with travel" across cultures. In fact, only a tiny proportion of the world's population travel by plane. Overall, I think it would be much more fitting to enwiki's global editor base if we didn't depict a specific mode of travel. If you don't like the alternative I found, please feel free to suggest another one. Or we could just not have an icon at all. – Joe (talk) 21:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Resting is a little different than vacationing, and while I share the concern about the climate impacts of flying, I don't think changing the icon here is likely to convince anyone to fly less (not to mention WP:GREATWRONG). I'm open to alternatives, but among the two options presented so far I prefer the status quo. Sdkb talk 21:53, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, but I see no reason why we shouldn't design userspace templates so that they are comfortable for the broadest possible range of people (e.g. the "vacation" vs. "holiday" parameter). It costs us nothing. As I said I'm not married to the OOUI icon I proposed, but there also hasn't been a substantial objection to it apart from aesthetic preference. – Joe (talk) 07:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

text:  I agree with Sdkb that the status quo is the default state until a more appropriate alternative can be agreed upon. --LeyteWolfer (talk) 23:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Icon
Talk:Eric R. Dinallo

message: The followimg e-mail has been sent to your permissions e-mail address:
Please note that I have responsibility for the Insurance Department web site and personally created the bio posted on that site and in the wikipedia article. please do not delete the Wikipedia article as a copyright violation as I hereby give permission to use under GFDL. please feel free to call or e-mail me with questions.
Thank you.
(contact info removed)
Drew044 18:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is not as much of a blatant advertisement as the Kathleen Rice and Sean Coffey pages are, but is still primarily a list of awards and achievements, with nothing negative, and not many neutral facts either. Can someone who knows about this person please add some neutral biographical details (and if there's anything negative that is important, mention it also) so that it doesn't read like just a PR resume?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pegasus-BSG62 (talk • contribs) 23:24, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: POV Check

message: Perhaps worthy of inclusion.  Anyone wishes to write this up?  Links:  1 2 -- Y not? 19:33, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subway incident Dec. 2015 

message: "Dinallo's father, Greg, was a writer for TV shows like "Quincy M.E." and "Knight Rider" and wrote an episode for "The Six Million Dollar Man" involving Bigfoot. he also took part in representing the AIG bailout." Thirddaughter (talk) 16:48, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dinallo's father, a tv screenwriter, represented the AIG bailout???
Talk:Antidoron

message: Some years ago I attended a service in Sardinia in the Spring in which unconsecrated hosts were blessed an then distributed after the service outside the church to the women who attended the service (only women attended). The women grabbed handfuls of the wafers, which were strewn with rose petals. I was told they were to be broken up in the fields to bless the land as the spring crops were being planted. Perhaps this is another example of the distribution of blessed bread in the Roman church. I have no more information than this personal story. William Rubel (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 21:37, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consecrated wafers Sardinia:
Talk:Tony DeSouza

message: does anybody have a solid reference for the spelling of his name?  Sherdog has it as Tony DeSouza, but his Facebook profile (which appears legitimate) has Tony De Souza.  A google search for "Tony DeSouza"+mma has 20,700 hits and "Tony De Souza"+mma yields 2,060 hits.  What is the preferred spelling and capitalization of his name? --jhanCRUSH 17:25, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tony DeSouza vs. Tony de Souza vs. Tony De Souza
Talk:Johnny Frederick

message: why did he not start playing in the Majors until he was 28 years old? Seems like he could have had a really great career. Kingturtle 18:19, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  questions 
Talk:Toronto Professional Hockey Club

message: I find irrelevant that the Toronto Pro HC is in the "Evolution of the Toronto Maple Leafs" box.
There was no real connection between the OPHL Team who stopped playing in 1909 and the NHA Team who started in 1912, except for their owner (and maybe a similar logo). None of the players of the Pro HC from 1908-09 played for the Blueshirts in 1912-13. There is also no connection between the OPHL and the NHA, which is very different for the Blueshirts and the NHL. Even if the NHL Maple Leafs don't recognize them in their history, the NHA Blueshirts are their real ancestors. The Leafs' franchise was built from the stolen team and players of Livingstone's team. The team was also named officially the Toronto HC (and nicknamed the Torontos and the Blueshirts) in his first NHL season (1917-18), just like the NHA team and they wore the same uniform and used the same players. They only took the Arenas name in 1918-19.
The Toronto Tecumsehs/Ontarios/Shamrocks are more related to the Maple Leafs than the Pro HC, since the Shamrocks merged with the Blueshirts after the 1914-15 season. After the PCHA raid for signing players that summer, there was only enough players left to fill one Toronto team. The remaining Blueshirts players and the Shamrocks players all suit up for the Blueshirts the next season leaving the Shamrocks franchise empty and dormant for the 1915-16 season.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dannyduke (talk • contribs) 19:11, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evolution of the Toronto Maple Leafs...???
Talk:Clinical Practice Research Datalink

message: This the same data source for the study lead by AB Bindman which found it to be unusable for international comparisons because of data quality issues. More than 30% of all encounter records had no indication/problem recorded. Problem may be in record somewhere but not linked to the encounter. The study was able to use a random sample of encounter data from USA, Australia and New Zealand data sources with proper linkage between encounters and the problems managed. Information from a conference presentation by Dr Helena Britt. tygrus (talk) 08:22, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Data quality issues 

message: This article talks about the data being anonymised. However, it also talks about linking to external disease registries on an individual patient level. Those two things seem inconsistent, as I can't see how it would be possible to link to external disease registries if the data were truly anonymised. It seems more likely that the data are pseudonymised (ie the identity of the patient is not accessible to someone given the standard data elements, but that somewhere the link between the records in the database and an identifiable individual still exist, presumably under much tighter security than the rest of the database). If the data were anonymised, then it would be impossible to link the data records to an identifiable individual.
However, I don't know what actually happens here. Maybe someone with intimate knowledge of how the database works could clarify?
AdamJacobs (talk) 08:17, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anonymised? 
Talk:Airborne collision avoidance system

message: Could it be that ACAS is also a flight hours and cycles database? 172.176.243.98 18:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airplane database 

message: What, exactly, was the "flaw in the TSO" that kept it from being useful? (BTW, vote "no" to merge; ACAS is a completely diff type sys to TCAS.)  TREKphiler hit me ♠  04:25, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  TSO AD 

message: Im surprised there is no mention of Auto-Ground Collision Avoidance Systems in this article. Is it something that has been removed previously? PrimalBlueWolf (talk) 13:22, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auto-GCAS
Talk:Gunnhild, Mother of Kings

message: The weakness of this article is that it doesn't discuss the reliability of its sources. Both Snorri (in Heimskringla) and the anonymous Egils saga is, in norwegian historical writings (e.g. Claus Krag in the second edition of Norsk biografisk leksikon) widely known as non-sympathetic against Eirik Bloodaxe and his wife Gunnhild. Accusations of her skills as a witch must be read in that context, and not be read as plain proof. --Orland 09:06, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weakness 

message: I do not agree with the use of the "in-universe"-tag in this article. In general, I think it is to easy to just slam a tag on an article rather than trying to improve it. In this case, I also find the tag inappropriate. The description of the tag clearly shows that it's intended for use in articles about purely fictional subjects. While it may be Pieter Kuiper's opinion that Gunnhild is a purely fictional person, this is not the general consensus, and should be debated first. Finally, the description page for the tag clearly instructs anyone using it to explain the reasons for it on the discussion page. This was not done. I therefore took the liberty to remove the tag.--Barend 15:24, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In-universe tag 

message: Would it be relevant to mention that the queen of King Charles III (a.k.a. Charles, Prince of Wales) in S.M. Stirling's Emberverse series took the name of Gunnhild?
--Elmyr (talk) 03:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearances in Popular Culture 

message: I'm really, really impressed with the lit-list. With the possible exception of the graphic histories (I know of two covering the era), you must've gotten just about everything mentioning her...
Is Harald Haarfager really called Fairhair in english? Misleading "translation".Smolk (talk) 04:01, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example to follow! 

message: There is no section on historicity. This article the way it is is clearly more of a literary character than a historical figure. The article tells a good tale admittedly but it is bad history and shouldn't be anywhere near an FA unless it distinguishes more clearly and has more material establishing and elaborating historicity. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 05:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE:An FA? 
Talk:Garðar Thór Cortes/Archive 1

message: This article definitely needs work before it can make GA status.  The lead is only one sentence and does not adequately summarize the article.  The article is insufficiently referenced.  The single covers are decorative and don't meet WP:FU, possibly the album covers as well.  The personal life section is only one sentence.  There's a trivia section and quote farm.  It looks like the Youtube links are copyright violations.  The promotional image in the infobox is replaceable, as is the screenshot.  ShadowHalo 04:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, will see how the article can be improved. Cheers, Jacklee 14:10, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed GA

message: I sent the following e-mails to the Believer Music Group today, requesting for permission to use the images in this article, and for confirmation as to whether the videos that the article links to were uploaded on to YouTube in breach of copyright. Cheers, Jacklee 17:26, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Letters requesting permission to use images and to link to YouTube videos

message: The photograph of Garðar Thór Cortes that was originally in the infobox has been determined to be replaceable and thus deleted. A suitable replacement photograph that complies with Wikipedia's fair use policy would be welcome. Cheers, Jacklee 02:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph of Garðar Thór Cortes 

message: I've added the pronunciation of Cortes's name using the International Phonetic Alphabet based on the way Cortes says it, but as I don't speak Icelandic, I would be grateful if someone who does has a look at it and confirms if it is accurate. Cheers, Jacklee 18:41, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation of Cortes's name
Talk:Geobytes

message: This page still has problems - please feel free to help.
Currently I am working on trimming down the technology overview to approximately 10 sentences.
StillThinking 18:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

message: I must say, I take issue with the statement in the "Notoriety" section which states:
Geobytes was one of the first companies to build...
with the "proof" being a patent filing in 2001.  My company, Digital Envoy, was the first into this space which can be evidenced by the fact that I started the company in 1999.  Since I am a competitor (or was, actually) to GeoBytes, I'm not willing to edit this entry to correct this since it may appear inappropriate.  But I'd suggest someone more neutral than me make a judgment on this.  Anyways, my two cents.
SParekh 02:07, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misstatements about Geobytes position in the industry 

message: Geobytes was also founded in 1999, with online evidence of their mapping technology going back to Nov 28, 1999 - see http://web.archive.org/web/19991128173915/http://www.networldmap.com/ - Perhaps the "proof" should be changed from the patent date to this web.archive.org page. (FYI NetWorldMap was the precursor to Geobytes until it's incorporation in 1999. See http://homeland.maine.edu/Connolly.pdf page 10)
StillThinking 12:30, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Response to "Misstatements about Geobytes position in the industry" 

message: ==== THIS DOMAIN IS CONSIDERET FOR MALICIOUS TRACKING POLICY & BLACKLISTED INCLUDING A POOR WEB-REPUTATION ====
* http://j.maxmind.com/ 
* https://www.virustotal.com/de/url/89122c1fcbe450e7cdf427a37f0d3da4c4e67a309f962ba195f6a950f0a57a85/analysis/1402421007/
* http://j.maxmind.com/app/geoip.js
* https://www.virustotal.com/de/url/bdffdcdd50418770193d866a68d097ffbbd72158caa110f2b7540bee5f2aab9b/analysis/1402420365/
* https://www.virustotal.com/de/url/cfe02816c21b8131e224a100ed3b9084e4a56e1335371bac118e8830e90b4474/analysis/1402422425/
==== BLACKLISTED hpHosts & Sucuri SECURITY CHECK ====
* http://hosts-file.net/?s=j.maxmind.com
* http://labs.sucuri.net/?blacklist=j.maxmind.com
* http://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/j.maxmind.com
* http://quttera.com/detailed_report/108.168.255.244
* http://www.urlvoid.com/scan/j.maxmind.com
==== REFERENCES (PLUS) ====
* https://urlquery.net/report.php?id=1402419878360
* https://urlquery.net/report.php?id=1402419914544
* https://urlquery.net/report.php?id=1402419881685
--Gary Dee 20:19, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hotlink MaxMind De-Linked 

message: * https://urlquery.net/report.php?id=1402419878360
* https://urlquery.net/report.php?id=1402419914544
* https://urlquery.net/report.php?id=1402419881685
--Gary Dee 20:19, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  REFERENCES (PLUS)
Talk:Devonshire Arms

message: Is The Devonshire Arms still a goth pub?
Dubidub (talk) 13:31, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really, it's expanded to include most of the "Alternative" spectrum. No dress code, and the music playing is a mixture of classic rock, punk, post punk, indie, goth blah blah  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.3.133.0 (talk) 21:26, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

text: The Dev AKA The Hobgoblin is now pretty much a punk and biker bar.  It's not really a goth venue anymore, there are no strictly goth pubs left in London.  If you are looking to go to a goth venue you would be best off going to one of the goth club nights held in several pubs/clubs around London, e.g. Vagabonds, Invocation, Dead & Buried, Reptile etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.47.19.249 (talk) 17:10, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still a goth pub? 

message: The article was proposed for deletion so I tracked down some references to establish notability.  It still needs work; for example, its current owner needs to be identified, and more secondary sources need to be found to further establish notability.  67.101.5.225 (talk) 08:53, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article still needs work
Talk:Glover Teixeira

message: Someone has changed the information about his fight with Jan Błachowicz to fighting 'the mma guru' in London for some reason. 2603:6081:2A07:5034:C0E:5488:A2F9:63D8 (talk) 04:53, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  MMA Fight Record
Talk:Five's image

message: Thispage is currently beng produced; plenty of detail will be added to this article, there is know need for its deletion.
:I am not a fan of the article, but the grammar is horrible. --AxG @ ►talk 18:47, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am also disputing the speedy deletion of the article, more on a technicality in that CSD A1 covers articles with very little context, something that isn't true to this page. As for having its own article, I would propose this being merged back into the main Five (channel) article, especially as the article size at the moment does not warrant any section which specifically focuses in on Five warranting its own article. Maybe the text can be merged under a Five promotion and branding section into the main article, alongside references for the points in this article, but I do believe the work here could be valuable to the main article. --tgheretford (talk) 19:34, 9 July 2007 (UTC)