Talk:Pierre Woodman

message: The article seems to me like a glorifying PR-piece. But as I’m against article deletion I toned the whole glorifying a bit down and asked for citations for some of the claims that are made in the article- but it is still not yet of the encyclopaedic quality level required. noclador 09:22, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The quality of this article is probably rather sad.  I just went through the history - nearly (only nearly?) all of the content of the article comes from IPs (which is admittedly not necessarily a disaster) and all of them are without source (which is). You could just as well remove all of it with a request for a source :( Probably it's not as bad as other French artist stubs - at least there is some content and it doesnt look totally unlikelyIridos 04:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Improve Quality

message: ¤A point of accuracy with the casting section, he does use condoms albeit rarely.  Obviously a link to a porn video isn't appropriate, and I have no idea where to find a source to cite.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.189.37.229 (talk) 15:15, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It probably implies that Woodman's more honest and straightforward than most entrepeneurs in the pornography industry.  Kinda POV. 209.180.40.12 (talk) 00:02, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: condoms

message: "At the beginning there was no commercial motivation behind them, but after the conviction of Mike Tyson for rape, he always asked for witnesses to be there when the castings took place."
Not that it really matters, but is there any connection between the two parts of this sentence?   Wanderer57 18:24, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: most of his so called castings are actually just pre arranged sex scenes with somewhat experienced actresses, not real castings with regular street girls.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.153.141.107 (talk) 19:50, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: source? 87.166.56.59 (talk) 01:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  fakes 

message: Since a few days, the article accused Pierre on having raped a latvian girl and gave along a link to an article in Russian. The link is here :
http://www.kriminal.lv/news/provincialynaya-devushka-chuty-ne-stala-pornoatrisoi
I ran a google translate on that link and the story is only the story of some girl which did not understood that the casting which was being filmed and in which she voluntarily undressed would be broadcasted on the internet. It's a local scandal, but not a rape.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.229.179.123 (talk) 15:04, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Woodman himself claims the story was made up and that Bajba doesn't exist: http://www.woodmanforum.com/with-pierre/what-are-the-news-t4915.html Since it is defamatory, I think the story should either be removed from his article or have multiple sources listed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.183.54.113 (talk) 15:11, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Rape allgegations

message: `(I created this heading to untangle the two subsequent bot-sections from the preceding one) Tullius2 (talk) 18:30, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  thus spoke the bot 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Pierre Woodman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.hotdor.org/hot-dor-1998-winners.htm
*Attempted to fix sourcing for //ficeb.com/ing/ninfai.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:22, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Pierre Woodman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140316035017/http://hot-dor.fr/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=2&Itemid=4 to http://hot-dor.fr/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=2&Itemid=4
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ficeb.com/ing/winners_ficeb_2003.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This is a proposal to  remove that ancient eyesore box at the top of the article. That ugly box is pointless - and has been so for quite some time. It has been here for 10 years now, with three additions, the last of which is 5 years old. I conclude from that fact that the issues have mostly been adressed. Owing to the fact that this is porn topic, the article references mostly porn industry sources. There is not much we can change about that - the New York Times does not chronicle the life and activities of the porn industry and its protagonists, so quoting porn industry awards shows, AVN and fan blogs is where the information is. The rest of the issues seems to have been addressed. I thus propose to remove the box. Tullius2 (talk) 18:30, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: an no one objects, I'll go ahead then Tullius2 (talk) 20:29, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess no one objected, but I give my wholehearted approval here| Theheezy (talk) 09:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal: remove the box at the top of the article 

message: Why is his real name, Pierre André GERBIER, not mentioned? It is used in business filings after all (Exhibit 10.12 at https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1068084/0000944209-99-000558.txt , also https://uspto.report/company/Pierre-Andr-Gerbier and https://trademarks.justia.com/857/34/woodman-85734704.html). 2A02:908:162:9E20:0:0:0:BFB4 (talk) 08:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: So ask User Zanimum. --Rosenzweig (talk) 09:19, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree with the IP. The justification given by Zanimum is voided by the IP's point. Name also publically available here in the UK via here at Companies House. What's the harm in adding it based on pristine public sources? BowlAndSpoon (talk) 14:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name