lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Media portrayals of Indigenous Australians

message: This article makes no attempt whatsoever to present a balanced view of its subject and is written in a manner to advance a particular position rather than a neutral encyclopedia article.  I have some sympathy with the position this article takes, but it is not an encyclopedia article. -- Mattinbgn\talk 21:53, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are welcome to add more contrary research if there is any but basically every study I found when I was researching this said exactly the same thing--that portrayals are negative and/or stereotyped. Calliopejen1 (talk) 08:33, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Given a Royal Commission and a federal government inquiry made recommendations to improve Media portrayals of Indigenous Australians, I don't quite see why the article fails to meet NPOV.  Have recent edits improved it to the extent the tag can be removed?  Although there are guidelines encompassing positive portrayal and providing balanced ... I don't see anybody reporting that this is a great Australian success story. --Matilda talk 05:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Opinion piece
Talk:Nénuphar

message: Despite this weird quote not being explained, there is either a translation problem, or a typo.
Le nénuphar à ta femme translates to Your wife's waterlily. The waterlily has your wife would translate back to Le nénuphar a ta femme (notice the absence of accent in this case).
Menelos (talk) 01:53, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Le nénuphar à ta femme
Talk:Esquimalt-Metchosin

message: I am proposing a merging Esquimalt-Royal Roads into this page as the ridings are mostly similar in boundaries and do not need 2 separate pages. Richthofen II (talk) 03:21, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Malahat-Juan de Fuca

message: Shouldn't this article mention where the district is?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.95.21.108 (talk) 01:52, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Where is it?
Talk:Kaplan Financial

message: This article relies entirely on primary sources. No indication of notability.--114.81.255.40 (talk) 07:11, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD 
Talk:West Kootenay (provincial electoral district)

message: I'm the guilty party who made this as an electoral riding article when it should have been a regional article.  Currently its counterpart East Kootenay is a redirect to the Kootenays article, and East Kootenay (provincial electoral district) has that format; but West Kootenay (provincial electoral district) redirects here.  So my move/rename project is simply to switch the contents such that this now refers to the region article, which will be the most common search, and the contents already here are moved over to West Kootenay (provincial electoral district).  In the long run I think the East and West Kootenay articles should be separated, and I have quite a few issues with the Kootenays article content as it stands.  NB Kootenay is the general disambiguation page for Kootenay/Kutenai....Skookum1 (talk) 15:37, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move/rename
Talk:Rowhill Nature Reserve

message: In December 2018 I revised this article. It then remained unchanged until March 2020 when an anonymous editor reverted on the ground that I had made major changes without discussion.
I revised the article to the standard format for Surrey Local Nature Reserves (LNRs). I checked to see what should be retained from the old version, but refs 1, 2, 3, and 5 are dead links. Ref 4 was for an award in 2011 which is not now significant. Ref 6 is not relevant to the article. I therefore deleted the details supported by dead links, apart from the statement that the reserve is the source of the River Blackwater, for which I found a live source. As the old version is almost wholly supported by dead sources and the new version is fully referenced and wikilinks to the Featured List on Surrey LNRs I have restored the December 2018 version. Dudley Miles (talk) 21:06, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion of new version of article
Talk:Fujikon

message: I am one of the principals of Fujikon Industrial Holdings Ltd.  Years ago I started a Wiki called "Fujikon Industrial."  Now I would like to rename it "Fujikon"  Therefore, I created a new one called "Fujikon"  Can you help me delete "Fujikon Industrial" and allow me to keep "Fujikon" instead?Byeung888 (talk) 07:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move request
Talk:Ful Haus

message: I wouldn't call it a spinoff.  Spinoff is when a character from the show goes and does a new show, that's within the original context.
Sounds more like a ripoff
Cleveland Show is a spinoff from family guy
Joey was a spin-off from Friends...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.65.21.127 (talk) 04:18, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  spinoff
Talk:American Abstract Artists

message: I removed the list of members and the three references used for it to improve the article. It improves the article to focus on the group as a whole without the name dropping. There is an external link to the American Abstract Artists website that has extensive membership information. I also combined a few footnotes to clean it up. Cowboy456 (talk) 14:50, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Colocation (business)

message: ===Images===
On 19 December 2012 at 1004, an anonymous user addressed the issue that there needed to be images. Anyone with such images or knows where to obtain such images should do so.
===Formatting===
This page lacks proper formatting. Someone with proper knowledge on the subject of Colocation should reformat the page to a proper format.
RJay (official) (talk) 23:55, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Images and Formatting

message: This page lacks proper formatting. Someone with proper knowledge on the subject of Colocation should reformat the page to a proper format.
RJay (official) (talk) 23:55, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Formatting
Talk:Administrative divisions of the Federated States of Micronesia

message: Someone misspelled the name of the municipality "Tsis" (in the state of Chuuk). I fixed it, but now a new problem has arisen - the alphabetical order of the municipalities in the state of Chuuk is slightly out of order, and I don't have much time to fix it now, so can someone fix this error? Thank you in advance! Assyrian Human (talk) 14:36, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A little error has arisen, can you fix it?
Template talk:WikiProject Micronesia

message: Could the noinclude section at the bottom be changed from:


Template documentation transcluded from Wikipedia:WikiProject Micronesia/Project banner
== Usage ==

Micronesia
*
Category:WikiProject Micronesia templates

to



Micronesia
*
Category:WikiProject Micronesia templates

Thanks, -- WOSlinker (talk) 22:22, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:08, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor change 

message: There is an updated template at Template:WikiProject Micronesia/sandbox which uses WPBannerMeta. Any objections to using it? -- WOSlinker (talk) 21:11, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. I also moved the categories to the documentation page (two were already there and redundantly on the template page as well; one was not). Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 20:54, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I've just spotted a small mistake I made (don't know how I missed it), so there is a small change that's needed:
 |TF_2_NAME           = the Floridiae work group
to
 |TF_2_NAME           = the Kiribati work group
thanks. -- WOSlinker (talk) 21:18, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

text: Done. --- RockMFR 03:14, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New version of template 

message: Flag_of_Johnston_Atoll_(local).svg has been deleted. Can someone either remove or replace it? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 20:39, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:05, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 4 December 2023
Talk:Tangential and normal components

message: This page could be improved by introducing and discussing the simple (Euclidean) concept first. Not all people coming to it are mathematicians, and one doesn't need to know anything about vectors in order to understand normals, nor should we be expected to delve deeper and deeper into increasingly complicated matters. Also, the word normal is used in the article, without explanation, as an adjective, though it's the probably the adjectival usage from which the noun -- meaning "normal line," "line normal" (to a surface) -- arises. Unfree (talk) 21:05, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Keep it simple
Talk:GenoPro

message: What's the license? Meonkeys (talk) 21:08, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it's commercial with a trial version. sjwk (talk) 00:30, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What's the license?

message: IMHO, it is not all that bad. I am more concerned about the sentence structure repeating "Genopro is" over and over, I think bulleted lists of features is what this needs, and then the advert template can go away.  BTW, I don't hesitate to put advert when I see a need for it.--John Bessa (talk) 01:54, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Advert status
Talk:Bulletproof (disambiguation)

message: why is there two section? seems like they could be amalgamated without any loss of meaning
Mancgollum (talk) 21:08, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure 

message: I've moved this troubled entry here:
* BulletProof X, a fail-safe mode that will be used if X fails to start up 
I changed it from BulletProofX to BulletProof X, since the G-hits favor no the space abt 2:1, but it's harder to tell whether the cap P is correct or not. 
In any case, there is no coverage of it at X Window System. More info should be gathered before we try to work out the various issues. A stub would be a good starting place; entries that appear only on a Dab page get little attention, but even a bad stub is something more worthy of correction than a rdlk Dab entry. --Jerzy•t 22:34 & 22:37, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  BulletProof X
Talk:Dominique Struye de Swielande

message: It seems this page is there only for self promotion. It is not worth mentioning any civil servant, especially from such a tiny state. Plus, the information about this person has absolutely no value in general. At this rate, should we list any chief in police, any mailman?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.182.217.237 (talk) 23:07, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self promotion
Talk:10.5 cm leFH 18/40

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Referencingand appropriate inline citation guidelines not met.    --dashiellx (talk) 20:29, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:10.5 cm leFH 18M

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Referencingand appropriate inline citation guidelines not met.    --dashiellx (talk) 20:29, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:7.5 cm FK 7M85

message: As title, the old 7,5 FK 16 nA was limited to training/territorial defence already in '39, the 7M85 was a attempt to get a field gun that was also a antitank gun, a failed attempt the gun was too heavy  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.46.217.144 (talk) 00:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This was not a replacement for the 7,5 FK 16 nA
Talk:Canon de 105 L mle 1936 Schneider

message: I removed the picture that was obviously not a 105 mm mle 36, but an older gun without the split-trail carriage of the mle 36. PpPachy (talk) 09:11, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, the 105 mle 36 has a split-trail carriage, so I removed another pic of the misidentified gun. 105 mle 36s intended for the French army were generally found without a shield, but with tyre wheels. Export examples intended for Romania typically had shields, different wheels, and a muzzle brake. You can see pics of the real 105 mle 36 (both variants) on the following page: , unfortunately they are non-free AFAIK. PpPachy (talk) 12:27, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So why don't you correct the description on the photographs themselves ? Otherwise nobody else will know they are wrong and will keep adding them to this page. Rcbutcher (talk) 14:23, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misidentified gun on picture 

message: Apparently the Syrians inherited or were supplied with a few of these guns, as there is an example of the Romanian version of this weapon (the Romanian guns had a distinctive single baffle muzzle brake) in the collection of the Damascus military museum, just next to a much more common 155mm "canon de 155 court mle. 1917 Schneider" (C17S) field howitzer. The French had seized some of the Romanian contract guns prior to the German invasion of 1940 for their own use, and no doubt some may have been passed on to the Syrian army after Syria's independence in 1943.SASH155 (talk) 00:45, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canon de 105 long mle. 1936 Schneider (L36S) in the collection of the Syrian military museum.
Talk:Woodchurch, Merseyside

message: The modern church St. Michael and all Angels was opened in 1965 and is by Richard O'Mahoney . The church was under construction still through 1964/5 when I was at school next door .I left the school in 1965 . The church was opened shortly after that but not while I was there . How it was founded in 1962 I fail to understand . Looking under listed buildings entries that agrees with my dates and the architect unlike this article .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.254.72.239 (talk) 00:20, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added text and references to reflect the founding of the parish, the commissioning of the church and the completion of the building. Both 1962 and 1965 are of relevance to the church's history, as is 1952. EP111 (talk) 10:11, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Catholic church
Talk:Sir Charles Blois, 1st Baronet

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:37, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Product information management

message: This page is flagged stating that the Talk page has specific concerns regarding buzz word usage, but the talk page doesn't actually have anything there.  Should the buzzwords header be removed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.73.110.49 (talk) 15:33, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buzzwords/Talk? 

message: This section talks about specific technologies such as Oracle and MySQL and a J2EE server. It states this authoritatively, but surely a PIM system could be implemented in a wide range of technologies. This information doesn't seem very relevant to the topic at hand and might mislead people to judge one PIM software better than another on this basis.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.98.0.249 (talk) 16:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technology section
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Frugetable

message: Sorry, find it strange, that you delete anything with the reason "only 46 hits in google". Is this a n enzyclopedia or a webmarketing place? everybody knows that google only ranks sites with commercial benefit. I do not know what the article was about, but I find your decission very very strange! 84.151.98.180 (talk) 22:01, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Rochdale Town Hall

message: I have more information, but I'm not sure where it will sit in the article:
*Rochdale Town Hall was visited by Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon in 1948 ()
*Rochdale Town Hall has Rochdale's civil registration office (,, )
*Rochdale Town Hall is used for British Citizenship ceremonies (, )
I'm also hunting for references that:
*Rochdale Town Hall was the tallest building in Rochdale
*That The Esplanade (opposite RTH) is the "widest bridge in Great Britain"
*Rochdale Town Hall houses part of the Rochdale MBC, and still houses the Mayor's office and other ceremonial functions.
And any images of the Town Hall, including:
*Stained glass windows
*Entrance
*Interior
Thanking you. --Jza84 |  Talk   12:22, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added this plan of the town hall (taken from Buildings of England) to Commons which may be of value when developing the article. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 15:05, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Here's a possible ref for the "widest bridge", --J3Mrs (talk) 15:48, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow! These are awesome finds. Thank you. --Jza84 |  Talk   16:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information 

message: Even if Hitler admired the Town Hall (strangely, it is not in the monumental early twentieth century neo-classical style he always favoured) it would be much cheaper to simply copy it rather than "move it to Germany brick-by-brick" as the article claims. 89.168.72.144 (talk) 23:00, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  URBAN CIVIC MYTH - HITLER
Talk:Hoodoo Gurus discography

message: More work is needed on this article. Perhaps good wikitables would improve it but I'm not sure how to create a wikitable so that the information is displayed better. The singles-only section (which I've just added) is a work in progress and is expected to be replaced by a better section / wikitable once I learn how (someone else is certainly welcome to do so).Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 00:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Some wikitables both for albums and singles have been added/edited by Dan arndt (and the undersigned), thereby improving this article. A table of B-sides is to follow.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 05:03, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikitables

message: A quick assessment of the list:
*The lead is far too long.  Try and get it down to three paragraphs or thereabouts.
Working on it.Dan arndt (talk) 04:47, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Reduced labels over-wikilinkage. Still to do dates.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm working on the wikitables (including adding a cert col) at my sandbox copy. I'm not very good at wikitables and keep having trouble with the column Head not being automatically coloured correctly.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 00:59, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Found the problem a couple of | needed to be ! Now working on aligning column widths a little better.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Done. Also increased width of second column.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Font size within tables now 10pt or greater: some column headings may be smaller.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

text: I've had a first go, more to follow.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 03:24, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: More done but still not finished.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Still working on wikitables: trying to add a Certificate col where appropriate.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 00:59, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Got it to work at last, now onto column widths.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested [[WP:DISCOG]] assessment

message: Stoneage Romeos is listed as having #209 chart place in the US. What list is that? The US list is supposed to be the Billboard 200, and #209 does not fit into top 200 list. 85.217.34.34 (talk) 19:05, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It would appear that an anonomous editor 75.170.87.124 went through a whole lot of discographies on 24 April 2011 and listed various albums as reaching #209 on the Billboard 200, unfortunately it wasn't picked up earlier - I have corrected the vanadalism on the Hoodoo Gurus Discography.Dan arndt (talk) 02:40, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stoneage Romeos @ Billboard? 
Talk:Calder, Alberta

message: The city of Edmonton has a formal residential subdivision called Calder. Parts of this neighbourhood are associated with the town or hamlet of Calder. Other parts might not.
So I've created a an article called Calder (Edmonton) as an article on the residential neighbourhood of Calder. This article focus on things like types of housing, periods of residential development, access to other areas of the city, schools, and the like. Things that would be important to someone looking for a place to live.
Stuff associated with the historical development of the area, particularly before the area became a part of Edmonton can be placed in the article on Calder, Alberta.
Johntwrl (talk) 22:03, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I merged the two articles, for a number of reasons:
#The Calder, Edmonton article, by necessity, covered a lot of the information that was found in the Calder, Alberta article - having a separate stub was unecessary, and certainly made it more difficult for the reader to read up on the full story of Calder.
#When an article becomes too large, it is common to break out sections into separate articles.  That's not the case here, and breaking out a section pertaining to a short period in Calder's history (less than 10 years) is not only unnecessary, but it prevents the main article from providing a comprehensive picture of the community.
#We typically do not create separate articles for periods in a community's existence, absent good reason to do so (usually because the main article is too large).  Skeezix1000 (talk) 15:49, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rationale for seperate articles for town of Calder and neighbourhood of Calder
Talk:Kultura Diktatura

message: In the succeeding three years since the redirect was emplaced, Kultur Shock has released three more albums. As many other bands have their own record label (including The Beatles, etc.) owning your label is not a barrier to notability. I have, as a result, removed the redirect and restored the old data. Blackfyr (talk) 23:10, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The release of more albums doesn't make the albums redirected per AFD any more notable as they still do not pass the requirements of WP:N and WP:NALBUMS. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:35, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Live in Amerika

message: In the succeeding three years since the redirect was emplaced, Kultur Shock has released three more albums. As many other bands have their own record label (including The Beatles, etc.) owning your label is not a barrier to notability. I have, as a result, removed the redirect and restored the old data. Blackfyr (talk) 23:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Notability of the album is independent of the notability of the band. WP:INHERIT. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:39, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled