lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:MSCI EAFE

message: The article doesn't say when the weights were valid. I'm not sure how excited MSCI Barra will be about you using their data in this context, anyway. I'd suggest you remove the numbers and point people to the MSCI EAFE page for current statistics. Calebu2 21:37, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constituent Weights 

message: I'm surprised that Wikipedia's index pages don't include their CUSIPs (at least this one doesn't)!  This would be very useful for a very small subset of folks that happens to include me right now. =)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.195.19.51 (talk) 15:38, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Indices don't have CUSIPs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.22.154.40 (talk) 18:42, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CUSIP? 

message: Can someone add an update about whether or not the index hedges FX?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.136.192.1 (talk) 13:25, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  FX handling? 

message: Within the past year, VEA switched from the MSCI's EAFE index to FTSE's Developed ex North America index.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.140.1.28 (talk) 20:45, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  VEA is no longer an example
Talk:Nazik Al-Malaika

message: I have classified this article as a stub due to its level of detail. Capitalistroadster 06:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub classification
Talk:Armstrong oscillator

message: Presumably the original Armstrong oscillator used a valve, rather than a transistor.  Shouldn't this be mentioned for historical accuracy? Biscuittin (talk) 23:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original configuration 

message: Article refers to L and T in diagram, but the diagram is completely unlabeled.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.27.97.206 (talk) 23:20, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram to be fixed 

message: This article has all of the information contained in Armstrong (tickler) oscillator and more. Not sure how much "merging" is needed, perhaps just a redirect page on the other article would work. —A 17:17, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: In the references, the German Patent for Alexander Meissner is referred to as Number 219,604.
However, this might be a wrong number, as the retrieval with Espacenet 
 gives a completely different subject.
I was unable to locate the patent neither in Espacent nor in German DEPATISNET, although several patents of Alexander Meissner are found.
Could the author please check its sources? It would be very valuable; and I would like to help searching, if I get more information where this reference has been found.
Rainglasz (talk) 19:22, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to correct German Meissner Patent information 

message: The patent of Meissner is from 1913, a year before Armstron. that is all. 
The strange policy of American patent authoryty at those times is much too well known!.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.221.229.226 (talk) 06:31, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: What's your point? ICE77 (talk) 00:58, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patent 

message: 1. How "weak" should the coupling be? What should be the value of L2 in proportion to L1? Is the JFET the only option or a MOSFET would also work?
2. "Many publications, however, embrace both variants with either name." Only a Meissner variant is introduced. What is the other variant? Is it the Armstrong variant? It's not clear.
3. Has anybody been able to simulate the provided schematic in this article and obtained oscillation?
ICE77 (talk) 00:59, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions
Talk:Krafft Arnold Ehricke

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 13:49, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:Thomas Turpin Crittenden

message: Check your sources. I believe Crittenden had taken command of the garrison at Murfreesboro, Tennessee just a day or two before N. B. Forrest's July 13, 1862 attack.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.211.40.227 (talk) 05:13, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:MindLeaders

message: The whole section on PILAR is written like an ad, deleting because it isn't encyclopedic. MDSNYDER 06:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

message: I've been finding external sources for facts referenced in this article and I've not been able to locate anything external for the renaming of the company as MindLeaders. The only source I can find is the company's own press release. Given that the rebrand is more or less a self-evident fact now - cf. www.mindleaders.com - is it sufficient to quote this source and remove the "relies on primary sources" tag? Diagram maker (talk) 10:48, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliance on references to primary sources 
Talk:Ehrenfeucht–Fraïssé game

message: "4. Duplicator picks whichever of a2 or b2 Spoiler did not pick." is phrased infelicitously, since it suggests Duplicator's pick is an already known specific individual of its structure -- but it isn't until Duplicator has moved. Rather, the earlier language that described Duplicator's side of the first move-pair should be echoed: "If Spoiler picked a2 from A then Duplicator picks some b2 from B not equal to any previous move from B, and contrariwise if Spoiler picked b2 from B then Duplicator picks some a2 from A not equal to any previous move from A." (N. Shum-Ish 06:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

message: The number of relation symbols must be finite. Otherwise one can construct elementarily equivalent structures on which Spoiler wins a single-round EF game.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8109:9900:2AC:DC74:2492:D105:8B21 (talk) 21:48, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finite vocabulary 

message: The definition section starts "Suppose that we are given two structures \mathfrak{A} and \mathfrak{B}, each with no function symbols...".  This implies that function symbols are to be excluded, by definition, from any instance of the Ehrenfeucht–Fraïssé game.  Is this the case?  Or should this section be named "Example" rather than "Definition"? Jim Bowery (talk) 17:40, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition or Example?
Talk:Sit on My Face

message: * No references.
* Needs a more formal tone. This is an encyclopædia, not a fan site.
* Legal threats to get the song removed from the album can be included and referenced.
* Fuller explanation of why it was performed at Concert for George can be included.
* US radio stations being fined for playing the song. There may be other cases.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dbromage (talk • contribs). 
Dbromage [Talk] 01:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup required 

message: I don't know what they're on about: Soi' assis au visage et dis, "Je t'aime!", fits perfectly with French scansion. Does it not?
Nuttyskin (talk) 11:57, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  French Adaptation
Talk:Special Collection Service

message: As a former employee of the Special Collection Service (SCS) for over 15 years, and travelling to all corners of the globe to perform intelligence gathering on behalf of the United States goverment; there were never any "black bag" missions tasked upon the SCS.  This is a myth that may have grown out of the SCS's close working association with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).  While employees of the SCS may have supported such operations usually conducted by the CIA, the SCS had no requirement under its charter to conduct such operations on its own.  The information referenced in your article should be corrected/deleted. --Maroonarcher 06:21, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Information should be properly referenced first, and if not: deleted. Tag any information which is inappropriately unreferenced with . --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 17:10, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Sure thats what you want us to think! ;)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.90.64.189 (talk) 14:12, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

text: Black-bag cryptanalysis is a subset of the class "black bag" jobs.  Sure, blame it all on the CIA ... *grin*  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.111.60.71 (talk) 02:05, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Black bag" missions

message: Neatly tucked away in the Maryland countryside and 'openly' disguised as an "Agricultural Research Facility" sits the main headquarters building of the Special Collection Service.  These coordinates (39°02'44"N/76°51'50"W) will place you right in the middle of this super secret facility.  One can see right through the "Agricultural Research" facade by noting the well placed microwave, satellite and HF log periodic antennae dotting the property at that location. 
Moonpenny 15:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, I drive right by it everyday. I just added it, but feel free to be bold and add such info yourself. Cheers! --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 17:10, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  HQs Location of SCS
Talk:Dryad (Quest for Glory)

message: This article does not provide an encyclopedic coverage of its subject. It needs to give details on the character's concept and creation, not just rehash plot and exposition from the games. Please see WP:WAF for examples on how to broaden the coverage of this topic. — Brian (talk) 06:25, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: In-universe
Talk:Decomposing Composers

message: I removed the deletion notice because it appeared to me to be an arbitrary notice placed on several Monty Python sketches. While its true that this skit and several others can not be absolutely defined as notable, I would argue that was actually the nature of Monty Python. Some of the funniest bits of that show were not the sketches which are commonly known, such as Spam but really the segue pieces. I am therefore removing the deletion notice on the grounds that it is arbitrary, and that Wikipedia provides an excellent repository for showcasing Monty Python skits. There are after all 100s of Monty Python Skits and only a handful that have been made into articles in Wikipedia.--10stone5 20:24, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: deletion notice

message: It was quite nice to find this Article and in my opinion it has to be ..continued ? 
commented, rebuild, grown.
There are many Articles about Songs with less MEaning than this one..
(Sorry for my mistakes, but i´m not used to write in english..)
--46.114.129.161 (talk)   — Preceding undated comment added 22:55, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Still alive in 2014
Talk:Food, Glorious Food

message: The article is completely unreferenced.  I don't like to put up stubs unless I have done some research first and can cite some sources that discuss the subject of the article.  Can someone do a google search at least and put some substance into this article?  For instance, the stub says that the title of the song has become a "popular food phrase" around the holidays.  Who says?  There must be something to say ABOUT this song beyond the mere fact that it is a song in the show/movie, otherwise it's not notable....  -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:14, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't agree more, and I'm glad I'm not the only one who is bothered by this sort of thing. Moreover, what is a "food phrase" anyway? Propose for deletion? Drmies (talk) 19:58, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?
Template talk:United States stock market indexes

message: I removed the ETF links and symbols. Many ETFs may be based on an index, but so are other financial products, such as passively managed mutual funds. Besides, several ETFs may be based on the same index, (for example SPY and IVV, or IWM and TWM); WP should not be promoting one commercial product over another in this way.-choster 06:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ETFs
Talk:Baba Yaga (Quest for Glory)

message: This article does not provide an encyclopedic coverage of its subject. It needs to give details on the character's concept and creation, not just rehash plot and exposition from the games. Please see WP:WAF for examples on how to broaden the coverage of this topic. — Brian (talk) 06:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: In-universe
Talk:Tribes (film)

message: Some time ago I found a red link for this film onList of television films produced for American Broadcasting Company.  The link was pipelined, and used Tribes (television) as its destination.  Unaware of the existence of this article, Tribes (film) I created a page with that title.  It has remained mostly unchanged since then.  Later I realized the mistake I had made, but was unsure what to do about it, and for a while I did nothing.  Then I came to the conclusion that the best resolution would be to merge that article into this one and change that article into a redirect page (which I will do next).  BTW with the additional sections from the merger, I think it might be time to think about upgrading the article's rating from stub to start class.Floggolozzo (talk) 18:01, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: I removed the following section:
"== Factual Error ==
At the end of the film, the CO flunked Adrian without Drake's agreement.  Under DOD Basic Training regulations, the Training Instructor's agreement with the CO is mandatory for such an action to be done."
It is unsourced, which is enough for removal. But beyond that I could find nothing supporting it on a quick search of the web. Note: Even if someone can verify the removed "fact" under present Marine Corps regulations, it is still necessary to show this regulation existed at the time of movie's setting. Doprendek (talk) 00:33, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "Factual error": Actually factual?

message: This IMDB link https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066490/ refers to title as "The Tribe".Billymac00 (talk) 02:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different title
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan/Film credits glossary

message: Would it be appropriate to include or link to some of the notes in the comments at http://www.pelleas.net/aniTOP/index.php?title=midori_ko_at_ottawa&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1 – particularly on "kantoku" as series director and "enshutsu" as line director on single works or episode director on series? Turtleheart (talk) 02:02, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Abu Usamah/Issue II

message: Now that #3 has been resolved, we come back to this. Before I begin to try and help you guys again, I just want to check that both parties consider this an issue under dispute. If you can just say "Yes it is" or "No it isn't" in response to the question "is this an issue under dispute?", that'd be great. Cheers, Daniel 03:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As for revisiting, I think I can drop this issue at this point.--SefringleTalk 04:13, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Revisting

message: Now that #3 has been resolved, we come back to this. Before I begin to try and help you guys again, I just want to check that both parties consider this an issue under dispute. If you can just say "Yes it is" or "No it isn't" in response to the question "is this an issue under dispute?", that'd be great. Cheers, Daniel 03:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As for revisiting, I think I can drop this issue at this point.--SefringleTalk 04:13, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, noted :) Daniel 10:47, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Revisting
Talk:The Lathe of Heaven (film)

message: I removed the four 'fair use' notices from 2007: the images were deleted so they are no longer relevant.--GwydionM (talk) 07:58, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair Use

message: I made these more specific.  I could not find the remark because they looked more "futuristic", so I removed it.--GwydionM (talk) 10:17, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References in Le Guin book 

message: Spirit medium Jane Roberts has a cameo role as the grandmother, and was likely cast as a nod to the similarity between the story's plot and her ideas about dreams.
 
Jane Roberts, the spirit medium, was only 49 at the time of this film. The actress Jane Roberts who plays the grandmother is much older, and starred in other films as well.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.135.37.234 (talk) 06:32, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jane Roberts 

message: This article states that George Orr was a draftsman. While he may have been in the original book, I don't think his profession is mentioned at any point in this adaptation. Jmdeur (talk) 22:37, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: correct, i just watched it, no mention of his job beyond his working in an office. I have rewritten the summary, but unfortunately i could not make out the Aliens philosophising, (dubbed copy) so i have left it out. I hope someone can complete the summary.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.234.123.226 (talk) 07:04, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draftsman? 

message: Why is "oneirologist" in quotes in the Plot section?  It appears to be a legitimately recognized word.
Best regards,
theBaron0530
TheBaron0530 (talk) 19:17, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey , I removed the quotes: the original authors of the plot section appear to have a healthy amount of skepticism about that kind of interpretation of dreams.  Keep asking questions, but small edits like this tend are usually uncontroversial, so you should feel free to Be bold!!! and make the tweak edits, Sadads (talk) 04:58, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is oneirologist in quotes? 

message: The redirect The Lathe of Heaven (film has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 21:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:The Lathe of Heaven (film]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Urban Justice

message: I won't take the time to look up to find out how to get the credentials for making the remark with the colorful logo that warns the reader that the editor is not pleased.  I will say that this plot description, as of 18:28 Greenwich Mean Time, 7 June 2015, does justice to Mr. Seagal's cinematic philosophy for a reader who has not seen this movie (such as me), for example, "Simon starts killing more gangsters...", "After killing all of Tucker's men and all of Shaw's men, Simon...".   I watched him on some tv talk show a few years ago where he'd brought along an assistant about half his size whom he proceeded to throw all over the stage in (staged?) martial arts throws that had the host, even, mocking him.  Apparently some people go for that sort of thing: the hero who never bends.
As soon as the editor assumes responsibility for enforcing the party line, I mean, community standards, detached from devotion to clear exposition, plentiful detail, and societal relevance, to restate Mortimer Adler's definition of an argument, she has ceased being an editor and become a writer: so let her edit her own stuff.  If this credentialed critic's beef is that the plot description is too violent, the description itself shows whom to blame for that.
But let us preserve the learning/teachable moment.  Concise plot synthesis:  Seagal kills [x number of, presumably quite a few dozens] persons extrajudicially, miraculously identifies the gun that was used to kill his son, and is ironically dubbed king of the gangsters by the (prior) king of the gangsters, thus proving that violence is good if your skin is extremely light-colored, your lips are pretty thin, and your nose is not too wide--but where does that leave Shaw, the corrupt policeman?  What was his sin?  He killed Seagal's son.  Ah, tribal vengeance.
I think the description as it stands now does Seagal more justice.  Not having seen this particular movie.  But having watched him throw the little sidekick all over the tv talk show set (and seen a bunch of his movies).  If an oriental-looking person had done the identical thing on the talk show set--making bodies fly as if by magic--nobody who's anybody would have mocked.  And certainly nobody questions the right of white people who can participate in major motion pictures to kill on an industrial scale in the name of tribal vengeance.  Seagal dignifies the practice by inhabiting the role personally, as if Clint Eastwood had played the sniper in the sniper movie.  Does that suggestion make your skin crawl a bit?  Aside from the age issue, which we can fix with computer-generated imagery (CGI)?  "This is what a mass-murderer who went to Dartmouth with your daughter looks like," as it were.  Chrisrushlau (talk) 18:23, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article's plot summary may be too long or excessively detailed. Please help improve it by removing unnecessary details and making it more concise. (May 2015)
Talk:Joan Root

message: Dian Fossey was a conservationist.  She was murdered in Africa in 1985.  Joan Root was a conservationist.  She was murdered in Africa in 2006.  They were both women of caucasian heritage.  Coincidence?
--Atikokan (talk) 03:15, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murders of female naturalists in Africa 

message: Is this worthy of a separate Wikipedia entry?  There are numerous cases now, of the murders (mostly unsolved) of White female environmentalists and conservationists in Africa.
Dian Fossey.
Joan Root.
Ymke Warren.
(REF: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/cameroon/7864423/British-gorilla-expert-murdered-in-Cameroon.html)
Is there a serial killer at work? Targeting them because of their racial heritage? Or is there a political motive? This needs to be dealt with. We cannot continue to sweep this under the rug. This is the sort of thing for which Wikipedia was invented - to disseminate cogent facts throughout the world, and spark debate amongst intellectuals who have the power to change things for the better.
Or am I wrong?
--Atikokan (talk) 03:43, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concern with murder of female conservationists in Africa who are of caucasian heritage
Talk:Cheryl Fergison

message: should it also be noted that she is paid for humiliating herself with her roles, always playing "the fatty" that asks for cake/biscuits or some other junk food item every time she has a scene? i just watched eastenders, they were talking about the wedding, and heathers only line was "have you still got the cake?"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.161.34.44 (talk) 07:44, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I feel it wouldn't be appropriate for this article. The article on Heather Trott has a section about the character's appearance and how Fergison doesn't mind that she is mocked for her size. –anemoneprojectors– 19:02, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled