Talk:Warcraft (video game)

message: As the  template says, this is a film thais still being developed. Therefore, the information on the article might eventually change, but that doesn't mean the article should be deleted since the movie was already officially announced at blizzard.com --Wesborland 19:25, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Key phrase: scheduled or expected. This is neither. --Calton | Talk 19:27, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not? --Wesborland 19:31, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean, why not? When, exactly, is this scheduled? Answer: it's not. Why is this "expected"? Answer: it's not, since a script hasn't even been written. There's nothing here. Read for this for further enlightenment. --Calton | Talk 19:35, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

text: The movie was officially announced, they already have a director and the script is unfinished, which is no reason to delete the article, since it is pretty clear that the movie is happening.--Wesborland 19:40, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't understand how Hollywood works, do you? And, again, what parts of "scheduled" or "expected" are giving you trouble? Nonetheless, since no one has shoot a single foot of film, cast a single actor, built a single set, drawn up a single production design, sewn a single costume, booked a single soundstage, or even written the script, every detail -- INCLUDING whether it will be made at all -- is complete and utter speculation. Wikipedia doesn't do complete and utter speculation. --Calton | Talk 19:48, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What about Mortal Kombat: Devastation? --Wesborland 19:53, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the difference between Devastation and WarCraft is that the former has at least had a script written (possibly), while the latter has not. Given Blizzard's size, I think it would be fair that this movie will move forward, but I can understand the concern. EVula // talk // ☯ // 22:29, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future Film 

message: I support the presence of this article on WP and the  tag. I couldn't care less about the film, nd I flat-out hate Peter Jackson, but I think there's more than enough on the web- and from reliable sources- to maintain an article. At worse, it should go to AfD, but I think the consensus !vote would be to keep the page. -- Kicking222 15:01, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was originally deleted via G4, a recreation of deleted content. I double-checked the deleted version , and the two are completely different, so I restored it (and let the deleting admin know). It quite frankly cannot be deleted under G4; if it is to be deleted, it must pass through a second AfD (I don't think it should be deleted, but I'd follow consensus if it was !voted "delete"). EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:54, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: I deleted Warner Bros from the Distributor section, Because Legendary's future films are now being released by Universal. and their deal with WB ends in 2014. Which is the same year that the Legendary/Universal Deal Begins. And as for WB, their releasing only 3 Legendary movies in 2014,whom are the last movies from both Warner Bros and Legendary. ("Seventh Son", "300 Rise of an Empire" and finally "Godzilla")
—Progorgonops12 09:01, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  WB is not Distributing Warcraft 

message: Why does the talk page link off of the Warcraft film lead to the talk page of the Warcraft video game? Perhaps that made sense at one time, but in no longer makes sense for it to do so.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.58.142.185 (talk) 21:35, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably to retain page history, although this is odd because the film article was deleted. I've redirected this to Warcraft: Orcs & Humans, the first game in the Warcraft series; compare to Kingdom Hearts (video game). --BDD (talk) 18:51, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk Page Redirect