Talk:Graem Bauer

message: In what episode did anyone say that Graham is a part of the Illuminati? dposse 23:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Illuminati?

message: Based on the motives of Graham detailed in this article, could Graham be some sort of oil tycoon? This page might be good for discussing theories about Graham's affiliations. -- Huysmantalk 21:21, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graham's Affiliations 

message: Since Day 5 took place eighteen months after Day 4, this implies that their involvement began in the aftermath of Day Four.
Since the two were eighteen months apart, is it possible that they had a hand in part of Day 4, or at least the assassination attempt of Keeler?  It may be speculation, but so is the italicized statement from the article.  Also, it seems to make sense, as putting Logan in the Oval Office could be seen as the first step.Eric Sieck 23:05, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aftermath of Day 4? 

message: Someone help me out here, doesn't spouse mean children? If so, why did we put his wife as a spouse? 
Order_66
:No, it means partner. Janipewter 17:11, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spouse/Family 

message: His last name was spoilerd.
Does it belong to this article? AgioMan
Only if it's confirmed in season 6, or by reliable sources. So please wait until the season starts and until we know the facts.
Order_66
Is it Bauer? The actor who plays his son already let it slip that his character's name was "Josh Bauer," so that seems fairly convincing enough to warrant an edit (with appropriate documentation of course). Don99
His Last name is officially Bauer, i am watching right now
:Confirmed. 'Graham' is indeed 'Graham Bauer.' Steviedpeele 02:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last name 

message: His wife's name is Marilyn so would her full name be Marilyn Bauer then? Or is it possible that she would still have another last name? I am putting her last name in under spouse. --68.54.101.229 03:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wife 

message: He is shown to be in contact with the man who sold technology to Abu Fayed.
Can't remember that one. Can someone tell me where it appears ? AgioMan
It is revealed that he's in contact with him inthe fifth episode of Day Six.-68.51.147.38 18:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fayed? 

message: In ep. five of Day Six, Jack and Graham's wife call him Gray (possibly Grey).  Should this be included?  I haven't seen any official site that can confirm this but one of those two were the right spelling (I turned the subtitles on to see how they spelled it).-68.51.147.38 18:30, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gray|Grey? 

message: Does anyone know how to fix the link in that 24 villians category box so that i can cnage it back to Graham Bauer, not graem? Order_66
:Considering that the FOX website, episode subtitles, the ending credits, TV guide notices and everything from season 6 has his name listed as Graem I believe it is safe to state that since Season 5 concluded they changed his name officially to Graem. –– Lid(Talk) 20:33, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Category Box 

message: I was just trying to edit this page and it looks like it was changed back to Graham. Can we start going through all of this and correcting the name. It's Graem. Not Graham. There are numerous sources confirming this, but people keep changing it to how they believe it should be spelled. I'm hesitant to change this page since it has even the wrong link address but can someone who is more knowlegable with Wikipedia start making those changes? -Kraw Night 01:44, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you read the comment at the very start of the article, and the line at the very top of this page?  Guess I need to make the font bigger. -- Chuq 01:54, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

text: FFS.  Look at the first line of this page.  Read the section linked.  All of it.  Including the bit about the current poll question on the official FOX site calling him "Graham/Graem".  I really hate it when people use big font sizes to draw attention to their own comments over others, but it appears it is necessary. -- Chuq 03:57, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Name! GRAEM not Graham! 

message: Let's get some technical issues resolved here. We can all readily agree that, thanks to the January 29 episode, his name is Graem Bauer. I propose we nominate the existing Graem Bauer redirect article for speedy deletion so we can move this article properly to that one's place without losing the page history. All in favor? Peptuck 08:15, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No need to nominate it.  An admin (such as myself) can move this page over the old one, without deletion.  I'll probably do so soon if there aren't any objections - when User:ContagiousTruth made his edits earlier, I wasn't sure in which context it was displayed (Ie. may have been written on some item (maybe he has a company called GRAEM?), or been faint or blurry and mis-read, or any number of things like that).  Now I have seen the episode and found it was written on screen - during the title sequence - it looks like "Graem" is a definite spelling now. -- Chuq 11:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, cool. I wasn't sure what admin powers were available to you guys, actually! Thanks. Peptuck 17:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Well.  Who's going to do it?  --Serge 20:42, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Technical issues with page/name

message: His job is not "Power broker." There are two uses of the word, both of which are misleading. The first would imply that he trades energy. Where on earth is that ever suggested? The second is colloquially used to refer to anybody in a position to create influence, and this is certainly not a "job" in any way. I am going to change it to "BXJ Technologies" unless someone has any objections. Don
 the page was moved.  --Serge 04:37, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Job

message: Graham Bauer → Graem Bauer — "Graem" is the spelling used in the show Serge 20:49, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
#Support.  As nominator.  --Serge 20:52, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Nobody knew for sure the "correct" (as "correct" as something can be regarding a fictional character in a TV show) spelling until it was aired this week, including the maintainers of the "official" web site.  It's all moot now that it has been officially spelled as Graem during the show. --Serge 20:59, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
#Support.  As nominator.  --Serge 20:52, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: #Support.  As nominator.  --Serge 20:52, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move

message: :Nobody knew for sure the "correct" (as "correct" as something can be regarding a fictional character in a TV show) spelling until it was aired this week, including the maintainers of the "official" web site.  It's all moot now that it has been officially spelled as Graem during the show. --Serge 20:59, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Their are currently two seperate pages for this character, one under the naame Graem Bauer and the other under the name Graham Bauer, both providing essentially the exact same information. Perhaps these should be consolidated (sp?) into one page, or else have one of the two redirect to the other? 66.24.228.114 01:49, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed it.  Someone impatiently copy/pasted the content at Graham Bauer to Graem Bauer, and changed Graham Bauer to be a redirect to Graem Bauer.  While that effectively moves the latest content, it loses the history.  The proper mechanism is to wait until an admin does the move correctly per the request noted in the section above.  --Serge 01:56, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two pages 

message: I'd like to suggest renaming the article "Graem (24 Character)" or something like that. The reasoning is because season 5 links to "Graem" back when he was known only by that name. Someone interested in S5 or even having seen S5 might goto the article, see the wikilink's target, or even click the wikilink and see the Bauer name and be spoiled. I suggest the Bauer be dropped from the name, and any Family connection be left out for under the spoiler tag (and only after all the info from season 5 is described so if someone comes to the article, they can stop when they see "in season 6..." TheHYPO 06:11, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. I get what you're trying to say, but Graem Bauer is his name, and it shouldn't be changed just becuase it's a spoiler. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.247.128.95 (talk) 19:57, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree. You really shouldn't browse Wikipedia for TV articles at all if you want to avoid spoilers, unless you're totally up to date. (BTW, an awesome feature would be a "wayback machine" that shows you a snapshot of Wikipedia at some past date, for spoiler-free browsing.) — brighterorange (talk) 16:28, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title Suggestion; perhaps stupid

message: I absolutely don't recall this. When did Graem let it slip that he was the one who informed the Chinese that Jack was still alive? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by AdamSolomon (talk • contribs) 05:14, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revealed to the Chinese? 

message: Hey, everyone, in the Day 6 section, there are a bunch of mix-ups between Day 5, Day 6, and Day 7. I got myself confused trying to fix this, partially because I didn't see a lot of Day 5. Furthermore, should they be called "Days" or "Episodes"!? I'm confused. Can someone fix this? 72.223.56.173 23:21, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode/day confusion 

message: If you want irrelevancy that's it. Neeknitsuj 12:07, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the point of the family tree. 

message: Character may have been instrumental in a couple of seasons but is not worthy of a separate page. The character will not be returning and the overall long lasting notability is lost. Also not all villains can have a separate page and not every member of jacks family can have its own page.--Lucy-marie 16:31, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am interested to know where you get 'three' from. And saying that he is a mastermind of season 6 is extremely generous. Cheng or Phillip maybe, but not Graem. asyndeton 17:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge