Template talk:Islam topics

message: the template looks pretty much like a replica of Template:Islam with added sections from Template:Fiqh. is there a reason it's not made redundant by these pre-existing templates? ITAQALLAH 11:19, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are other sections as well not on that template. A navbox template has the advantage of being able to be placed in articles where an infobox template would be too big, or where there is a specialized infobox (i.e. Shia islam) where :Template:Islam wouldn't make sense. Besides, many topics have infobox and navobx templates (like :Template:Antisemitism and :Template:Antisemitism topics, :Template:Sikhism and :Template:Sikhi, etc.)Yahel Guhan 04:51, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  repetition of other templates? 

message: Itaqallah, you said in your edit summary,  concur, we don't. but this is something time-restricted and not a significant part of Muslim life/culture. if you believe it is, please substantiate it on the talk page. 
Firstly, how is it "time-restricted? Secondly, reguardless of whether it is a significant part of much of muslim life/culture today, it was so in the past, even as far back as the time of Muhammad, so in that sense, I think it is very relevant. Yahel Guhan 19:56, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's time-restricted in exactly the same way Christianity and slavery and Judaism and slavery were time-restricted (note their absence from their respective topic templates). Slavery was as prominent in pre-Islamic times as it was in post-Islamic times. The only difference was that jurists specified a few rules so as to limit their acquisition. In fact, I think the slavery link may be better placed under the law and jurisprudence category given its discussion in the legal literature. What do you think? ITAQALLAH 23:41, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: sure. place it there. Yahel Guhan 00:47, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Islam and slavery 

message: Why? I don't immediately see why this template is protected (especially since Template:Islam is not), but could someone 1.) unprotect it, 2.) avoid the redirect for women and Islam to women in Islam, or 3.) both? I will not be watching this, so please post on my talk if I am needed. Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:27, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection request 

message: The link in this template to Shi'a Islam redirects to Shia Islam.  Because of this, the link is not "black" when viewing the template from the Shia Islam.  Not a big deal, but something I usually like to fix.  Thanks. DavidRF (talk) 15:48, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  fix redirect - minor issue 

message: Hi would you be able to please change Islam by country (at the Islam and culture section) to List of countries by Muslim population but state as: Muslim demographics, thanks. HaireDunya (talk) 18:56, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Link fix please

message: Under Law and jurisprudence, there is a subtopic Sexuality. It has 5 components :  Masturbation, Sexual techniques · Sukuk · Takaful · Tayammum. You can go through the articles and confirm that Sukuk and Takaful come under Law and jurisprudence > Economics. And Tayammum comes under Law and jurisprudence > Hygiene. It is, therefore, requested that these edits be kindly made to the template.  Hamza   [ talk ] 04:59, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, that's an old problem. Issue was introduced in this revision. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 19:13, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved. The sections are still somewhat messy btw. (especially in regard to use of italics and , vs. · If you have suggestions for cleaning it up, please make a new request so that this can be solved. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 19:19, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sub-sub topic error

message: hi, i have a suggestion where you could add 'cultural uslim' to the template because many muslims are not religious and non-practising but only muslim by culture.
otherwise you can implement it in the denomination page
thanks
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Muslim
Jigglyfidders (talk) 18:39, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Where should it be added in the template ? —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 13:53, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

text: I've put it in the "Related Topics", there's not really a fit elsewhere.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:17, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  cultural 

message: Hello. Here is a version of the template that has more visible and also wrapaware dots between links; avoids bold and italic text within the lists; spaces the lists apart a little more; rewords "Conversion of mosques" to "Conversion to mosques"; and probably one or two other tweaks I can't now recall. If all the parentheses aren't to people's liking, I've seen "Navbox subgroups" used as an alternative.
212.84.101.159 (talk) 04:38, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: Hi, as of now it says Quranist which should be changed to a noun as Quranism. Could someone make this change pls?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.24.58.182 (talk) 04:33, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Noun

message: Right now under denominations it says 'Quranist', but the appropriate noun should be 'Quraniyoon'. Could someone make this change? 84.13.63.254 (talk) 01:50, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: request

message: I have noticed that Umayyad, which this templates links to, only redirects to Umayyad Caliphate so why not change that? --85.129.111.17 (talk) 12:12, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - I've updated it. → AA (talk) — 13:26, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link. 

message: Almost half of the link targets in this template are to redirects. Could we please change every one of them to point directly to the article pages? Normally in an article this isn't a problem, but in a template it prevents links from appearing bolded when on the relevant article page and instead creates "self-redirects" back to the article. I've got "link classifier" installed in my vector.js User:Zunaid/vector.js which colours all the offending links in green. There are too many to give a listing here but anyone with a similar user script and WP:POPUPS installed will be able to quickly correct the entire template. Zunaid 06:26, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Did the first 7 groups; the others sttill need to be done, leaving the  tag active. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:48, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

text: Completed the rest. I've left in the following: Islamic ethics, and Early Islamic philosophy as they weren't simple pagemoves, it seems that those entire articles have been redirected per some user cleanup issue, so perhaps if we leave the redirect title users may at least look up the revision history if they still wish to see what content was there. -- œ™ 03:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link targets 

message: The current article has two problems. 1)In pillars section, only Sunni's pillars are written, and this section must be splitted in two parts, reflecting both Shia Sunni pillars. 2)About Denominations section. As it can be seen in Islam article, the two main sects are Shia and Sunni. Like articles of others religions, for neutrality, Shia name must precede Sunni name (alphabetically ordering). My suggestion is to split this section in two parts, one Shia and Sunni, and one about others.--Aliwiki (talk) 20:30, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems

message: Hello. I was wondering if it would be appropriate to add The Epistles of Wisdom to the Religious Texts category? It's debateable whether this is an Islamic text, but it is definitely Ismailic and a development of Islam. Thanks for any consideration! Paul Bedson (talk) 23:04, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Epistles of Wisdom]] 

message: Hello. Can you add the templates in interlanguage links ? I cant do it because this template protected. Thanks a lot — Skandar blabla 21:39, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A bit off-topic, but it would be best if an admin could just semi-protect this template. I see no point for the full-protection. Wiqi(55) 22:03, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

text: There is interwiki for Bosnian Wiki also for this template. -- KWiki (talk) 19:40, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interlanguage links 

message: The Sociology pages have been deleted, so the redlinks (· Sociology: Early sociology ) should be removed from this template. --Elonka 14:57, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Anomie⚔ 20:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks much! --Elonka 22:41, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Sociology

message: Please, change the falsely used letter ĥ to ḥ or h.   Ĥ is an Esperanto letter, not used in transliteration of Arabic or any other Semitic language. I couldn't edit the template as it's protected. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 14:08, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ĥ 

message: Please add this version - it cotains link fixes and nothing else. Christian75 (talk) 09:07, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I amended it because it was showing the documentation twice. Something that should be considered is WP:HLIST. --Redrose64 (talk) 13:41, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This version is without two sandboxes. There was two because one for the actual page, and one for the sandbox... Christian75 (talk) 15:28, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. I updated it to use the hlist class, and I also reduced the protection to semi-protection as there were only 160 transclusions. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 10:03, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Direct link fixes 

message: Please replace the current template code with the version in the sandbox here (should be the most recent). There's no change in content, just in presentation. The sandbox code doesn't include the noinclude section that calls the documentation: if/once this request is granted, I'll update the documentation page accordingly (collapsible options).
Thank you,
213.246.85.251 (talk) 03:46, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Funandtrvl (talk) 22:58, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: * Thank you. I've now updated the documentation page. (And, incidentally, added this request as a consequence.) 213.246.85.251 (talk) 11:33, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 January 2014 

message: 109.92.115.38 (talk) 08:46, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. L293D (☎ • ✎) 11:49, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 June 2018 

message: baligh should not be subsectioned as an aspect of Islamic theological jurisprudence; it should instead be under the section on Marrige and Sex, or else be its own topic. Theology refers to the study of the nature of divinity; baligh is a specific aspect of Islamic law dealing with sexual maturity and legal adulthood. 50.254.174.101 (talk) 15:33, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Fish+Karate 11:01, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baligh 

message: Not even showing Jihad as an Islamic topic shows that the extremists own the word.  Jihad in the Inner/Greater sense is an Islamic tenant and should be added to the Culture section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.81.103.41 (talk) 13:38, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jihad 

message: This includes nation of islam and more comprehensive, consider replacing it.108.31.73.33 (talk) 05:59, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[African-American Muslims]]