lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Female Prisoner 701: Scorpion

message: The title and the intro calls the film "Female Convict [#]701: Scorpion, but the bulk of the refs refer to Female Prisoner #701: Scorpion. This discrepancy needs to be addressed. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:39, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Having, by serendipity, just seen another article with the same hash mark issue, I am able to resolve the seeming contradiction.  I hope (and am happy that) this resolves the concern.  Contradiction tag now gone.--S. Rich (talk) 10:12, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: WormTT has pointed out to me the actual basis for the contradiction tag -- Prisoner vs Convict.  I'm sorry I did not read more carefully.  Well, it is really a translation issue that the different resources use. "女囚" translates out to either "female prisoner" or "female convict".  Just as easily, it could translate out to "woman prisoner" or "woman convict". "女" means woman or female and "囚" means convict or prisoner (see the little "人" inside the box?)  "囚人" translates to "convict" or "prisoner" and "女" makes it female.  In English we might get wrapped around the axle because while all convicts are prisoners, not all prisoners are convicts.  Solution for this article?  Simply add something that says "aka Female Prisoner 701". --S. Rich (talk) 14:20, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

text: I'd be happy with this solution, and I bow down to your expert knowledge of foreign languages... they're just squiggles to me, which is where I got stuck! WormTT 14:40, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia doesn't decide the names of foreign language films in English, and it has absolutely no right to do such a thing. If an English version of the film exists, use the title in English. If no English version exists, use the name of the film in Japanese in romanized letters. JoshuSasori (talk) 06:49, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction

message: The article makes reference to 'features not incorporated in other women's prison films' however the nature of these elements is not discussed.
Also, the article describes how the film is artistic but once again does not elaborate.
I edited these sentences to improve clarity but perhaps they should be removed?  
Kittet (talk) 20:41, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, they should be removed, as should all the fansite reviews and other misleading stuff. JoshuSasori (talk) 02:41, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues with citation 

message: The image on the article was for a different film! On the left of the poster was very clearly Bunjaku Han but she is not in the film. When I looked at this more closely, the film is actually the 1976 version, not this one, so I've removed the image. JoshuSasori (talk) 02:41, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: The review in the text doesn't appear in the list here, and web searches only show up copies of wikipedia pages.
http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/issue/200704
* 
I have removed it from the article. JoshuSasori (talk) 06:33, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bogus or mistaken reference
Talk:Kuyavia

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:47, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Bydgoszcz is not Kuyavia, Bydgoszcz is southern Pomerania 83.21.254.167 (talk) 12:23, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Pandit Ravishankar Shukla University

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:26, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.prsu.ac.in/AboutUs/AboutPRSU.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sminthopsis84 (talk) 17:24, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Hippie Hippie Shake

message: For future reference/writing: this article in The Age. --Melty girl (talk) 08:01, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More on the controversy among the real people being depicted

message: In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 
* "brisbane" :
** 
** 
DumZiBoT (talk) 06:51, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot report : Found duplicate references ! 

message: A movie which is in a condition to be screened typically would have had a director prior to the aforementioned screening.Varlaam (talk) 20:35, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Director? 
Talk:European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization

message: Is the CENELEC allowed to publish EN Standards? --Abdull (talk) 18:56, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, according to EU Regulation 1025/2012. 188.25.246.19 (talk) 20:09, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

text: @Abdull 177.227.57.183 (talk) 14:52, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  EN standard 

message: A map showing which countries that are members would be really useful.. Electron9 (talk) 21:57, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Article saying that Moldova is affiliate member, but on the map it is shown with the grey color. --Dima1 (talk) 09:46, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Membership map
Talk:Office 1 Superstore

message: But I just gotta rewrite it :) ViperSnake151 20:51, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is not spam and the company appears notable (600 stores), but it needs some reliable secondary sources to prove notability. I removed the  as that is only for articles where expansion is somewhat critical. The  is appropriate here. It also contradicts itself. The infobox says the HQ is in Spain, but the body says it is in Florida. That needs to be fixed. It also needs some more incoming links from other articles to be more useful. Mr.Z-man 00:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This may be notable...
Talk:Semantic interoperability

message: I do not agree with the constraining of semantic interoperability to computers. Humans also need to establish semantic interoperability (they need to ensure that the terminology, abbreviations etc shared between two or more individuals is understood by all to mean the same thing.
124.178.225.20 slade beard
: Interoperability is about computer systems exchanging information -- not humans.  The entire context of the term semantic interoperability is about computer systems exchanging information.  The meaning of the term could someday evolve to include human context, but I have seen no evidence that this has yet happened. -- DBooth (talk) 23:26, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Central African rock python

message: Please update.
Python natalensis is now a subspecies on its own. And seperated from sebae.
https://m.facebook.com/groups/1643835265678127?view=permalink&id=1788498164545169
http://reptile-database.reptarium.cz/species?genus=Python&species=natalensis&search_param=%28%28taxon%3D%27pythonidae%27%29%29
 AWDF 09:39, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: IUCN now shows "Central African python" (P. sebae) and "Southern African Rock Python" (P. natalensis) as two separate species. So does ITIS. ITIS has marked the subspecies names as invalid and the two species-level names as valid. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 00:37, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Natalensis is now a species on its own 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Uncontroversial. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:11, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. I don't see Central African rock python at ITIS, only at the IUCN. Reptile database uses Southern African rock python but not Central African rock python. However, before the species split, the two subspecies were commonly known as the Southern and Central African rock python (e.g. here, here and others), so the IUCN is just using the common names of the subspecies for the same snakes at species level in accord with the revised taxonomy. I see know reason not to follow the IUCN. —  Jts1882 | talk  06:01, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 June 2022
Talk:Midland Air Museum

message: Its location on the border of Coventry and Warwickshire makes its location confusing.  There is a Coventry border signpost in the road opposite MAM.  It seems to me that some of the car park may be in Warwickshire, but the entrance and the main building is in Coventry.  There is a Coventry City Council notice on a noticeboard outside MAM, which is another clue.  My guess is that it is in Coventry; however, I am not sure why the postal address is at Coventry Airport, which is in Baginton, Warwickshire. Snowman 21:00, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked at an OS map, and it seems that the boundary follows the Baginton-side edge of the A45 from the big roundabout with the A46/A444, then comes out at right-angles to go around the trading estate opposite the MAM, but then follows the airfield-side edge of Rowley Road. So although the road outside the MAM is in Coventry, MAM itself, along with all the rest of the original airfield land, is within Warwickshire. Twopenneth 09:21, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that you are probably correct - I have just phoned them up for confirmation. Snowman 09:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Location

message: Seems odd to me that each exhibit has not been linked! Any reason? --Red Sunset (talk) 19:56, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There have been a number of edits to this page, and what you see is its current form. Anyone is welcome to add links, images or content that will improve the page. Snowman (talk) 20:26, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there is a lot of work to be done on the lists here. Some of the exhibits are in the hanger and some are out on the grass. The lists are all linked on the "City of Norwich Aviation Museum" page. Snowman (talk) 10:02, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Will add wls when convenient. --Red Sunset (talk) 18:03, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exhibit wls
Talk:European Union National Institutes for Culture

message: The national EUNIC member from Cyprus is the Organisation for European Programmes and Cultural Relations, as of June 2021 and not the Ministry any more. 213.7.54.96 (talk) 18:19, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyprus EUNIC member
Talk:HEVT

message: You may want to get a better photo then just the team picture; see if you can find one of the car
Electricaltape 21:01, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

message: "HEVT placed Fourth in the first year of the Challenge X competition series (Sharp), Third in the second year, First in the third year, and 8th in the final year. Problems with heavy rains and the Belted Alternator Starter motor (BAS) caused the team to place lower than anticipated. 
"In the second year of the Challenge X competition, HEVT was the first place team (Gurski). Virginia Tech’s competition entry, the REVLSE (Renewable Energy Vehicle, the Larsen Special Edition) is a split parallel hybrid using a Ballard Ranger 67 kW [[Electric "
There seems to be a contradiction here.  CBHA (talk) 00:46, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd or 1st in the second year? 

message: The source gives:
The prize-winning HEV Lumina can go 600 miles without refueling, a range more than twice the minimum goal set by the competition's sponsors. Merkle said the car can reach a top speed of 75 and gets 40-50 miles per gallon from its propane-fueled generator engine.
but the article gives mpgge. Which is correct? JIMp talk·cont 16:22, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: mpg or mpgge?
Talk:Douwe Korff

message: Bearian 21:47, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Notability needs to be established through the inclusion of reliable sources. Please reference all statements. Be aware that this article may meet the criteria for speedy deletion, as it is a biography of a living person that states no sources. I have not nominated it for deletion as yet as it does not appear to be contentious and the creator appears to be related to the subject. Thanks, CaNNoNFoDDa 17:29, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: The previous version contained some material that seemed to be a copy of http://www.londonmet.ac.uk/research-units/hrsj/$-old-hrsj-pages/staff/associate/korff.cfm, so I removed it. — Ksero (leave me a message, things I've done) 11:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyvio 
Talk:Conté

message: this article says in the beginning that conte crayons weren't invented practically until the 19th century, but then later it says they were used by the old masters of the Renaissance. ?_?
:I just took out that paragraph. Renaissance artists certainly used red chalk, but not the manufactured form of the Conté stick. __Just plain Bill 04:37, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sepia is dark brown, originally from cuttlefish ink. Sanguine in this context refers to chalk in a variety of reddish colors. Article could also mention white, pierre noir, and bistre. Be back to fix it after a while... __Just plain Bill 01:38, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sanguine and sepia are different colors
Talk:North Hertfordshire College

message: I removed the following sections because of blatant WP:COPYVIO:
# Stevenage Centre (http://www.nhc.ac.uk/AboutUs/OurCentres/StevenageCentre.aspx#ad-image-0)
# Stevenage Skills Centre (http://www.nhc.ac.uk/AboutUs/OurCentres/StevenageSkillsCentre.aspx#ad-image-0)
# Hitchin Centre (http://www.nhc.ac.uk/AboutUs/OurCentres/HitchinCentre.aspx)
# Centre for the Arts (http://www.nhc.ac.uk/AboutUs/OurCentres/CentrefortheArts.aspx)
# The Goldsmith Centre (http://www.nhc.ac.uk/AboutUs/OurCentres/GoldsmithCentre.aspx#ad-image-0)
# North Hertfordshire College, part of the Gazelle Colleges Group (http://www.nhc.ac.uk/AboutUs.aspx)
--Drm310 (talk) 15:47, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copypasted sections
Talk:Knebworth

message: Hi Everyone,
Is there actually any evidence that Sam Fox or Martin Freeman live (or ever have lived) in Knebworth? 
Stephen Hemingway (talk) 17:14, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Killian documents controversy

message: There are instructions for changing the status of this link on the tag. Or query cyberbot operator or go to ANI. Please do not restore this link. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 03:26, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Blacklisted link

message: Why does "Manuel Miranda" link to this article, then the name "Manuel Miranda" is mentioned nowhere in this article? 173.88.241.33 (talk) 05:37, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Manuel Miranda]]

message: This sentence fragment asserts a fact which is unsubstantiated: "Proportional-print typewriters were in use in the early 1970s which could have produced the documents". If you read the citation in the article, the crux of the assertion is not supported as true by the linked-to WAPO archive article. In other words, the article which is used to validate the assertion "could have produced" does not validate it. And given that this is in the opening paragraph, it causes confusion. Including this unsubstantiated claim in the opening paragraph imbalances the article and insinuates that there was a thread of possible validity to the provenance of the documents. I recommend that the sentence containing it be re-written. Tondelleo Schwarzkopf (talk) 14:30, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  unsupported statement asserted as fact in the lede
Talk:Acklam Hall

message: We the pupils of the former Acklam Hall Grammar School, and Acklam High School, a 13-18 school on the site from 1968-75ish were told that there were previous manor houses on this site.  Immediately prior to the Hustlers were the Boyntons, but before that was a manor owned the de Brus family of Robert the Bruce.  They were lords of Cleveland in North Yorkshire, their main seat being in nearby Guisborough, and Annandale in Scotland. Sasha (talk) 01:04, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Previous Manors 

message: I have removed this story, which could have an element of truth in it, but is more likely an attempt to make links that don't exist. It tried to link the sale of the Hall to Middlesbrough Council to the business dealings of the Hustler with the Hall's inheritor. There was one reference to it - from "Then and now" - but this itself cannot be seen as a reliable source. 
::Although the Hustler family occupied the Hall for 300 years, in the early part of the 20th century the estate was inherited by Mostyn Hustler Hopkins from his mother Everard Hustler, second wife of William Innes Hopkins, owner of a local steelworks and construction company, Hopkins, Gilkes & Co. The Hopkins family fortune was destroyed by the association of this company with the Tay Bridge Disaster. It is therefore possible that the sale of the hall to the town of Middlesbrough was in part due to this infamous episode.
The reference was here. Francis Hannaway (talk) 12:41, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conjecture - poorly sourced anecdote 
Talk:2008 Cincinnati Reds season

message: Where can we add something about Griffey's 600th HR? Adding all of the information in the intro doesn't seem appropriate.   jj137 (talk) 18:27, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea.   jj137 (talk) 00:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ken Griffey, Jr. 
MediaWiki talk:History-title

message: Should we look at this being $1 - Revision history?  I'm wondering about how it is sorted in browser histories and that it might be better to have the history entry next to the article entry.  It's only a minor point though, and I don't really feel that strong about it.  violet/riga (t) 21:27, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, and it might be better when using tabbed browsing or when showing the title in the taskbar.  violet/riga (t) 21:29, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't want it to be dashed in that way, though the current "title" format could be improved and made more consistent: the edit page, for example, uses 'Editing [whatever page]' rather than 'Editing "[whatever page]"'. I really want to get rid of those quotation marks. Nihiltres(t.l) 00:22, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My recommendation of the dash is so that it supports " - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - [browser]", but that might lead to too many dashes.  I thought about putting it in brackets but that would clash with disambiguated articles.  I agree that the quotation marks stand out too much and are inconsistent with our normal style.  violet/riga (t) 10:02, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In terms of being consistent with our usual style, a simple removal of the quotation marks might suffice - I would recommend that for now. As for the title dashing, yes, that would be a little too much, though granted, I can't appreciate that aspect since both of my browsers (Firefox and Safari, both on Mac OS X) display only page titles at the top of windows. Nihiltres(t.l) 11:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Text
Talk:SBB-CFF-FFS Am 4/6 1101

message: I think this is a very interesting and impressive piece of engineering, so have fun reading the article :) Sorry, its a bit rough here and there, but I'm sure that will get fixed :) --Kabelleger 21:36, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article creation 

message: Dates for ordering and first run corrected based on cited referneces from Brown Boveri and ASME.  Unfortunately this means the English language version of this page is not in harmony with the German version.  That said, I think the sources given are very credible (it was after all Brown Boveri that built the turbine). I have left a note on the German version of the page requesting they review the souces I have used and either correct their page or give an explation why the build date of 1938 has been used.
--Stivushka (talk) 12:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Update - Issue resolved.  German language version of page updated. Stivushka (talk) 03:24, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates Fixed
Talk:Edward Cudahy Jr.

message: I accidentally fell upon an article that detailed the kidnapping of this teen. I had never heard of him, I am not from the area, nothing. I have no investment here. I looked up this article out of curiosity after having read the original LA Times article. Also there was a point in the narrative here that used the word "They returned to the Cudahy mansion" and there was the familiar clarification tag that was (correctly) pointing to "They" and I fixed that after double checking the article. Turns out he was alone, or so they said so that fixed that. However, it did publish the (supposed) full ransom note which I'll relate here. It can't be copyrighted, I don't believe, since it would normally be owned by the US Government AND it's been over 100 years since it was published. I'm not sure what to do with it. Should it go in WikiSource or WikiQuote? I'm not sure where to put the text, but I've created a user page with the full text and feel free to copy and put where it blongs. It's located here: Cudahy ransom note. MagnoliaSouth (talk) 00:43, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The full ransom note and the LA Times article.
Talk:Alexander Allan (locomotive engineer)

message: Sources differ widely about the dates of Alexander Allan's birth and death so I have removed the dates, pending further research. Biscuittin 21:40, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: Allan was never CME of the Highland... or indeed of any railway. He was Locomotive Superintendent of the Scottish Central Railway, and whilst there acted as consultant to his nephew William Barclay, who was Locomotive Superintendent of the Inverness & Nairn Railway (1855-65) and simultaneously of the Inverness & Aberdeen Junction Railway. These two lines amalgamated in 1861, and they amalgamated with others later on, the combined concern taking the name Highland Railway from 29 June 1865. One week later (5 July 1865), the SCR became part of the Caledonian. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:37, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chief Mechanical Engineer