lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fatwas by Suyuti

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  
The result of the debate was merge and redirect to Suyuti. howcheng  {chat} 19:54, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:List of cryptozoologists

message: This list is far from complete.  If anyone wants to add a few names, feel free! Zagalejo 20:03, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete

message: You have confused one Robert W. Morgan with another, and have hyper linked to the wrong one. The one pertaining to the page, the Cryptozoologist described, is in fact NOT dead, but alive and quite well. The mistake is with another Robert W. Morgan, from the same State as the Cryptozoologist, who was a DJ and HAS passed away some years ago. Fixing this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.80.21.88 (talk) 04:44, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Robert W. Morgan

message: I understand the reason for this article, but why lump skeptics under the label "List of Cryptozoologists"? Seems unnecessarily complicated KanyeWestDropout (talk) 21:42, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change? 

message: According to WP:LISTPEOPLE, a person is typically included in a list of people only if the person meets the Wikipedia notability requirement. Normally this means that there is a separate article about that person. However in this list there are well over 100 people included who have no article (and are redlinked). Is there a reason why WP:LISTPEOPLE seems to be so flagrantly violated in this article? CodeTalker (talk) 19:15, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please WP:BB and cull the non-notable names.  – S. Rich (talk) 03:03, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I have removed all entries which do not have an associated article; that is, all redlinked entries. CodeTalker (talk) 03:26, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why so many non-notable people on this list?
Talk:Village gods in Taoism

message: What is the Chinese word for "village god"? --Voidvector 19:27, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He's actually a form of Tu Di Gong, I guess. 125.225.65.30 (talk) 04:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the Chinese word for this?
Talk:ISO 3166-2:IN

message: Hi there. I just wanted to say that this table is wrong - Delhi is a state, not a union territory. Can someone please correct this? Thanks. 69.224.223.141 20:09, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Delhi is not a state. A state requires a constitutional amendment to come into effect. =Nichalp «Talk»= 07:19, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Delhi

message: I wish to find images that can be used as emblems for each state that can replace the ones deleted; hopefully flags. I am open to any such suggestions. :)--Thecurran (talk) 04:52, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  State Images
Talk:Prophetic dance

message: I've been a Christian for a pretty long time, and i've never heard or read of a specific requirement for dancing in order to recieve the Holy Spirit, shouldn't this read that it is one possible method sometimes used to exibit gaining the Holy Spirit?. Several times in the Bible such as in the Book of Acts the Holy Spirit is said to come onto the disciples and Paul, but they never danced for it, it just came upon them through their great faith. Homestarmy 20:10, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Merlyn Rees

message: Why was it necessary for him to change his name by deed poll?  If Merlyn Rees had wanted to be known as Baron Smith when he entered the Lords, he could have just indicated that preference and no deed poll would have been required.  Why the deed poll when his name became Merlyn-Rees?   JackofOz 20:10, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wondered the same thing. Tony Banks became Lord Stratford without, as far as I know, needing to change his name by deed poll. The letters patent should surely dictate the new title. --Whouk (talk) 20:19, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My wild guess is: the title you're known as (I'm fairly sure of this) has to be approved by some nob in the Ministry of Silly Names.  (I'm less sure, but consider it likely that) the nobs at that time would have turned their noses up at someone calling himself Lord Firstname-Surname, so he had to change his surname. Mark1 20:29, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see that the same applied when George Brown became Lord George-Brown. JackofOz 20:45, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks, Proteus.  JackofOz 02:04, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Change

message: I see someone's changed it to "Merlyn Rees, Baron Meryl Rees".  Two points:
:* it's Merlyn, not Meryl
:* the hyphen between Merlyn and Rees (after Baron) is part of his title and should not have been dropped.
Can an admin please fix this?  --  JackofOz (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I've moved the article to "Merlyn Rees, Baron Merlyn-Rees". Hope that I understood it correctly. --Tikiwont (talk) 12:35, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well done.  Thank you.  --  JackofOz (talk) 21:36, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: BAD move

message: I'm not certain, but aren't British politician article bio intros suposed to avoid using English, Welsh, Scottish & Northern Irish? GoodDay (talk) 19:13, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  British, Welsh etc etc 

message: "Former Home Secretary, Merlyn Rees admits MI5 did wage a dirty tricks campaign against the last Labour government. New allegations of security service involvement in a plan to undermine the Wilson government are disclosed in a book out today, Who Framed Colin Wallace, by Paul Foot. It had to be rushed into print to avoid the new Official Secrets Act, which gets royal assent tomorrow."
*

:.... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 02:40, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  MI5 dirty tricks campaign
Talk:List of tank landing ships

message: I question the importance and usefulness of a 38kb list of ships. The US ones at least have pretty obvious names anyway. I think about 14 of the first section of 1070 links are blue at present. If anyone is interested in these vessels, I find it unlikely that they will search for this list specifically, as they will probably know the number of the vessel they are looking for. As such I am posting this on AfD, whilst myself abstaining (I am not an expert on list policies etc. and I'd rather let more experienced persons than myself decide.) Dan 20:11, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comments

message: Although Juan Carlos is referred as an aircraft carrier, she is a Multi-role vessel for the Spanish navy capable of performing many versatile kinds of operations one of which being the one we are discussing. So I have not yet edited the article but I strongly believe that Juan Carlos deserves its rightful place here.
P. S same for the Australian navy. 
P. P. S please ignore any spelling errors! CAPTAIN NOBODY (talk) 09:54, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of the Spanish navy
Talk:Liberty Bank Stadium (Des Moines)

message: It seems that this stadium is still in the planning stages and not "under construction".  Is there any evidence to indicate otherwise? 
--FuzzyBunny 20:16, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

message: This stadium is unlikely to ever be built.  The article contributes little information to warrant existence as a standalone article.  Suggest this info be merged into the Des Moines Menace article. --GrandpaDave (talk) 19:23, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A redirect will suffice; the team page already mentions essentially everything here. --BDD (talk) 23:47, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with Des Moines Menace article 

message: This page had re-appeared (the redirect was changed in September, and fixing it brought the text back) so I've re-instated the merge outcome from August 2012. Moonraker12 (talk) 06:52, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge, again
Talk:Sarvajanik College of Engineering and Technology

message: Someone keeps adding links to the SCET mailserver in the external links section. Please refrain from doing so- this is not beneficial to the Wikipedia and certainly nothing good can come to such widespread attention for your mailserver.
:Please refrain from deleting this page again. If you disagree with my point, discuss it here. DevanJedi 06:03, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: Utscursh keeps adding the article on Verve to this page, which is both prone to vandalism and not conforming to WP:NPOV
--BruiseLee 08:19, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verve 

message: Since Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VERVE-SCET reached the consensus to merge and redirect VERVE-SCET to SCET, the VERVE section is required, and so does its clean-up which is badly needed. --<FONT style="color:#5A3696">ΜιĿ</FONT>ː<FONT style="color:#008000">talk</FONT> 09:32, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not believe a poorly written section is required. My last edit was a cleanup. I put VERVE-SCET up for deletion so I know all about that verdict and I actually went to this college so I know what Verve really is. Now allow me to clean it up. DevanJedi 14:39, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This looks fair enough as a section, thank you (the last one was like a reference hidden somewhere in some para). Anyway, consider that VERVE-SCET is not deleted, but is retained as a Redirect. This requires to have a visible section on the page, and that is what Stifle tried to achieve by merging the respective section post AfD. Hope this is clear enough to you now. --<FONT style="color:#5A3696">ΜιĿ</FONT>ː<FONT style="color:#008000">talk</FONT> 15:05, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  VERVE section - post AfD closure 
Talk:Green Architecture

message: Anyone think this article should be merged with green building?  I know they're conceptually distinct, but it seems like the same stuff would be covered by both articles.  --Allen 20:36, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good; I'll do it.  --Allen 04:32, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with green building?
Talk:Trapper Keeper

message: Is this a parody of Terminator 2 AND Akira, or just coincidence about akira? Ragzouken 20:38, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ?

message: Jon Wyant, a research and development manager at Mead, made a significant contribution to the creation of the Trapper Keeper. He suggested the name "Trapper Keeper" for the binder that could hold the folders with vertical pockets, which ultimately became the iconic product. Additionally, Wyant designed the shape of the binder, the shape of the folders, the flap closure, the logo, and even the plastic clipboard in the back with the spot for the pencil, resulting in a full three-dimensional prototype
https://www.thisamericanlife.org/815/transcript Reagle (talk) 21:36, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: "Jon Wyant, a research and development manager at Mead, says he made a significant contribution to the creation of the Trapper Keeper." Fixed that attribution. Schazjmd (talk) 21:43, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual designer
Template talk:Air America radio stations

message: * Should we remove Katherine Lanpher and Marc Maron from the list? They don't work for Air America Radio anymore, to my knowledge. Are we only including current hosts in the list? --Toddbloom7 20:45, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup Hosts

message: This template is way too large.  A template is not meant to be a repository for every article on a topic.  That's what a category is for.
:Perhaps in a few years, we can start trimming it. For now, because the font is small, it is still manageable (in my humble opinion). --Asbl 12:33, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too Bulky 

message: I tried to change the template to indicate the network has been defunct (for over a year now). My changes were not shown in preview so I abandoned my changes. 1archie99 (talk) 16:20, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunct notation someplace?
Talk:Ku (fictional language)

message: The information abou the history of "Ku" comes from this defunct webpage, http://www.cityboxoffice.co.uk/africanlanguagecentre/call/interpreter.htm. Here is google's cache. -- OldRightist 20:48, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Save Me (Embrace song)

message: Is the Embrace song a cover of the Queen song? The article phrasing makes it unclear. —Slicing (talk) 21:00, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sand lance

message: Very nicely done for starting an article from scratch. Why not explicitly list the sources you used in a references section? - Taxman Talk 21:23, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I really should get on that ... much of it admittedly was cross-checking from yon external linkage. I need to put up a better cited and more indepth article, but I don't have my ichthyological literature on hand (may have lost it in a recent move).  I'm more of a birder than an ichthyologist! - Miwa 04:10, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nice work
Talk:Harold E. Robinson

message: I agree that the extensive list of publications seems unnecessary but have held off deleting it as I haven't done any other editing on this article; are any other botanists (or any scientists for that matter, living or dead) treated so thoroughly??
:Actually, this is rather a short list, taking into account he has more than 650 publications under his name. Don't forget he named over 2800 new species and is one of the most prominent botanists on Asteraceae. In my opinion these are only the most important publications and Wikipedia should be proud to list them. This way we can truly distinguish ourselves from other encyclopedias. (BTW please sign your entry with four tildes). JoJan 09:05, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Second answer : Yes, there are other botanists treated so thoroughly : e.g. look at Ernst Mayr. This centenarian continued publishing until he was 98 years old ! We should not treat someone who has hundreds of important publications the same way as someone who had only a few publications !  JoJan 09:11, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Japanese newspapers

message: The title of this article somehow strikes me as awkward; isn’t there a better way to express it? Even more basically, why is there no Wikipedia article on “Japanese newspapers” per se?? There is a general article on “Newspapers,” with nothing about Japan, and a simple “List of Japanese newspapers” but nothing on Japanese newspapers per se. You should start such an article; one obvious place to start is the Japanese Wikipedia article on 新聞, plus articles in standard Japanese encyclopedias, Kokushi daijiten, etc. And why limit the dates to what is available at Columbia? This is very parochial, when a simple search on RLIN or OCLS will give you references to resources throughout the US. Also, the whole article should begin with an explanation of the ways in which newspapers have been reproduced, above all the shukusatsuban format, which should be clearly explained, and its history given (probably began with Asahi in early 20s). The whole article is too much like a list of what’s at Columbia: it should be a broader article on what is available anywhere. Throughout the article, the Romanization is inconsistent, sometimes “shinbun” sometimes “shimbun.” By the current Kenkyusha standard, all should be “shinbun.” But the “List of Japanese newspapers” article uses “m”. I think all should be changed to “n” but maybe this is going too far. Jb05-Hds2 00:29, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed changes 

message: I came here trying to find out why all of the world's top five newspapers (by circulation) are Japanese; why, seemingly, a decent proportion of all newspapers published come from one country -- and not a country with an overwhelmingly huge population. Any ideas? 190.21.163.157 (talk) 04:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circulation 

message: The Brief History is missing a date reference: In the first sentence of the second paragraph of this section there are no dates given yet the second sentence makes the date reference: "In November of the same year".  However this appears to be incomplete as there is no year previously specified.  Can someone with suitable knowledge please update this information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.115.145.188 (talk) 08:40, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:   In November of the same year 
Talk:Chicken George

message: I thought Chicken George was the name of a descendent of the author of the book "Roots". You know the one that was remade for tv and was seen by over 100 million people?
I'm not sure if it is worth dedicating a section to Chicken George, but maybe the person described in this entry used this name as a reference to the freed slave?
I made a disimbagualtion to explain that. The Republican 21:50, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Roots

message: I agree with The Republican; let's create a disambiguation page. ProfessorPaul 00:31, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Let's create a Disambiguation page

message: OK, no one panic! ALL of the previous article (minus the disambiguation at the beginning) was relocated to Chicken George (politics). I also expanded the old article, added categories, tested and improved its existing Wiki links, and added a "See also" category. You are welcome.  ProfessorPaul 01:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous article moved

message: the following was removed from this page:
*A small take-away food outlet in Marrickville Metro, a shopping centre situated in the inner-Sydney suburb of Marrickville.
As non-notable. Travb (talk) 04:19, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed from page
Template talk:Campaignbox Early Muslim Expansions

message: I think the red links should be removed until an article on the topic is created.Pepsidrinka 21:39, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: FYI at some point there will probably be a split between battles which Muhammad participated in (Badr-Tabouk) and the battles of the "Conquest Period" (Dathin-Zab).  It won't happen for a few more months, since the conquest period is still getting fleshed out, but I just wanted it out there. Palm_Dogg 02:47, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: I would have three separate campaign boxes: Byzantine-Arab Wars, Sassanid-Arab War and Islamic conquest of Iberia.  The battleboxes for each should specify "Part of the Islamic conquests". GCarty 12:36, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that we have three seperate campaign boxes out there, can we also have a seperate one for the Civil War: Bossorah, Siffin, Karbala and just delete this campaignbox? OR maybe make this a box that lists the different campaigns that fall within the Muslim Conquests, because there are also the Arab Khazar Wars, and  Maybe if someone adds Afghanistan, India, the battle with China that defacto fixed the border with the Tang dynasty etc. If we do India we probably need to cut-off at the end of Ummayyad period and stop at Muhammad bin Qasim campaigns in Sind--Tigeroo 09:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  That makes sense. Having battles like Karbala and Siffin listed under muslim conquests is quite confusing. --aliasad 02:24, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Ok I have gone ahead and changed both the template and its name to reflect that the expansions were a series of campaigns. So the template now lists the various campaigns of expansion, I was not sure which box to place the two redlink battles Ain Al-Jarr and The Nobles, I can add these as well. I will go ahead and make a similar new campaignbox for the Muslim Civil Wars. With likely three sections 1) Rashidun and the Umayyads 2) Uprisings against the Umayyads 3) Umayyads and the Abassids where the three battles listed Siffin, Bossorah, in catergory 1, 2 will have Kerbalah, Zaidis, Zanj, Mamun etc, 3) will have zab
*Comment they link of Central Asia goes to the page Islamic conquest of Afghanistan which is not technically correct because it also an expansion into Transoxania and Khwarezm while at the same time a push was being made towards Sindh and the wars with Khazars in the Caucus, so I feel that article will have to reworked a little or a different link found because that article goes beyond in its scope to the modern days and on any possible overlap between this and the Khazar-Arab wars over Transoxania as well include the battle with the Tang dynasty in this section as well. 
*Am divided on wether Sindh/ Muhammad Qasim needs a seperate section or can it be lumped here.
*Also am unsure of the correctness of the term Asia Minor because they didn't get into the area covered by modern day turkey in the time period covered by this campaignbox.--Tigeroo 10:10, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is three separate campaigns!
Talk:Eye Scream

message: Please take the time to review WP:NPOV and edit your article accordingly. Also, copyedit and Wikify your article. Any questions at all; please ask. Thanks. PJM 21:40, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Note to author about clean-up

message: I fixed lots of stuff, hopefully it looks a lot better. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PolarisJunkie (talk • contribs) .
:*Great...it looks much better. But you still need to Wikify it much more and tidy up the grammar. There's also a hint of POV remaining in the intro. If I can be of more help, let me know. PJM 21:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed 

message: Eye Scream is the title of a book by Henry Rollins which I intend to create a small entry about.
I changed the redirect page to the "Everything" album, this article also contains a bit about the Eye Scream book. I don't know why this redirect page lead the "Obnoxo the Clown" article, but if anyone has any qualms with my decision they can change the page to a disambiguation. -Brutananadilewski (talk) 20:25, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book by henry rollins