Talk:Emma Watson/Archive 3

message: This is the only biography I have ever seen that has a citation next to their name. Surely that's a bit unnecessary? I don't keep up with the discussion here, so maybe there is some significant reason I don't know about - otherwise I would just edit the page... ugen64 18:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, ugen64. I believe there's been some common misinformation on the Internet about what exactly her full name is and after whom, if anybody, she's named. That's why there's a citation, if I remember right. — President Lethe 19:54, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Hi, ugen64, President Lethe is exactly right: there is misinformation that is common, that is why. Daniel Radcliffe and Rupert Grint also have citations because there's misinformation about their middle names; Lindsay Lohan has one because her professional and birth middle names are different. Citations are required any time anything is or could be in doubt. :) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 20:33, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: -- I see you put a lot of work in here so I'm adding this. Editing from a PDA atm so I can't edit this page as a whole; it won't submit, so I had to  add a new section - this one. Could someone please move it to the topl Cheers — G<B>a</B>ry Kirk | talk! 18:34, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, only if others who've done their fair share put their names in, too ;) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 18:54, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, well, that isn't me, so they can either do that themselves to show willing, or you can find them - there's something on the Toolserver, under /~daniel I believe, showing who's contributed to an article - though I guess it's corrupted these days...sigh. — G<B>a</B>ry Kirk | talk! 19:22, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maintenance 

message: Just wondering, do you guys think we should put the fan mail address on the page? --Ewonline 00:01, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Also, this page needs archiving. — Gary Kirk // talk! 13:38, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. :) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 20:15, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Great! I would have done it myself but I was just about to leave. And I wasn't sure how much to archive. — Gary Kirk // talk! 10:27, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Me, either. ;) It's guesswork, really; the only real guideline is, discussions in progress stay here. :) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 12:52, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fan Mail Address 

message: Emma won the Best Actress/Movie for her role as Hermione and the Best Young Actor award in the SyFy Genre Awards. (http://syfyportal.com/news.php?id=2895) Should we put that under awards or is it considered insignificant? --Ewonline 20:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I took it out for the time being, as I've seen no indication that these "awards" are notable; naturally, if there's significant, citeable evidence that they are, it should go back in. :) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 20:16, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SyFy Genre Awards 

message: There is no reason to take Rita Skeeter's description of Hermione's physical appearance at its word.  The article itself, in context, was obviously vindictive. St. Jimmy 15:39, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: With all respect, you're completely missing the point by treating Skeeter as an actual tabloid reporter in this world whose word is not reliable. The fact is, J. K. Rowling created Skeeter and Granger, and anything any of them says is canon, including the "unreliable" word of a fictional tabloid reporter. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 17:32, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK...so it's canon that Skeeter said that.  That doesn't make it informative.  In an earlier Skeeter column Herm. was a "stunningly pretty Muggle-born girl."  That's canon too, but are we going to put that in the article?  Are you suggesting that rl tabloid reporters are unreliable but fictional ones are not?  Sorry, the section still needs a rewrite. St. Jimmy 00:55, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Then, write it in; if Rowling wrote it, it's canon—and, yes, both would be relevant and informative. Just make sure it's cited. :) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 03:24, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Career/Appearance/Rita Skeeter issue

message: There's not a single Google hit for this guy, much less linking him romantically to Emma Watson. Sounds like someone is abusing his editing privileges, doesn't it? I'm going to remove that part for now. If anyone can come up with some proof for this claim, then feel free to change it back.
Jason the Delicious 03:47, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Steven Piepkorn?