lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hans-Thilo Schmidt

message: it shall be noted again that the enigma operator manuals in their first editions gave away many info  that should have been kept utmostly secret to make the very machine a properly secret tool. This was  one of the many grave mistakes that happened at that time. greetings to Matt ! Frank
: Yes: in particular, Marian Rejewski made use of a stretch of matching plaintext and ciphertext, together with the key
settings, in an early manual, in order to resolve ambiguity in his solution of the Enigma rotor wiring. — Matt Crypto 04:19, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Operator manuals

message: where was it that said Schmidt's motive was money , he was not a political spy like Richard Sorge ?
Frank
:Hugh Sebag-Montefiore's book digs into Schmidt's background and motivations. "Should Hans Thilo Schmidt be revered as an unsung hero, or had he just spied for the money? He had not exactly given the Enigma cipher to the Allies. He had sold it to them for a lot of money, and his original act of treachery had taken place two years before the Nazis seized power...[he] was perfectly prepared to put his life on the line as long as he made a handsome profit, and seduced a lot of women, in the process" (p. 10) — Matt Crypto 04:19, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Motive

message: Ernst R. May says in his Strange Victory that Generaloberst Rudolf Schmidt was Hans-Thilo Schmidt's brother. 88.195.213.75 (talk) 14:36, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: His brother the panzer general
Talk:Rime dictionary

message: The word 'rime' is a specialised word in Chinese linguistics reffering to the character rime classes in Chinese philology. Please revert the changes. 
Dylanwhs 08:57, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The searches that I linked to take that into account.  Chamaeleon 17:15, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

text: Hmm, interesting.  Let's take 王 wáng, 床 chuáng, and 昂 áng.  Which are traditionally considered to rhyme in Mandarin? Chamaeleon 17:42, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Now I understand finals and rimes are different.  I will soon show you some poems.  The syllables áng and chuáng rhyme, therefore they have the same rime, though they have different finals.  I will rewrite the articles on finals, rimes, etc. - TAKASUGI Shinji 16:19, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

text: My own two cents are that the distinction between 'rhyme' and 'rime' can be meaningful. To destroy this distinction in wiki articles is therefore to make these articles less informative. Even if not all linguistics distinguish rime and rhyme, the conversion of all rimes to rhymes would be unwarrented. (n.b. 'rime' is the etymologically correct spelling). Tibetologist (talk) 09:12, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Of course etymological correctness is beside the point, which is usage.  In this case the majority usage of subject experts is "rhyme dictionary".  Why should we emphasize a distinction they do not make, and what is that distinction when we're talking about books whose purpose was to describe and prescribe poetic rhyming?  Kanguole 20:16, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

text: There was a reason why my comment about etymology was in brackets, I agree it is irrelevant. You make a good point about the point of rime books, and I would be fine with calling rime books rhyme books. But what I don't like is saying that this or that languages has a certain number of rhymes. Perhaps better to say 'codas' or soemthing more precise if you don't like 'rhyme'. Tibetologist (talk) 07:35, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK.  I don't think we'd want to say that about languages, but it is common for authors to say that a particular book is divided into some number of rhymes.  Kanguole 10:13, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Rime" as opposed to "Rhyme"
Talk:Rabbinical Council of America

message: I've reverted Truthaboutchabad's comments, since I think we need to differenciate between the RCA, which is a group of Rabbis, and Chabad religious and social services, which are for the laity. Does Chabad have an internal group of Rabbonim that might be comparable to the RCA? Mikeage 09:25, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, nearly all chabad rabbis have synagogues, and they are all together under a central organization call Merkos L'Enyonei Chinuch. Thousands of them come to their annual convention, and they all gather together to make international programs and campaigns.--Truthaboutchabad 11:06, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Very well, I was familiar with the periodic gatherings, I was just trying to clarify if we're talking organizations of Rabbonim per se, or just organizations of people. I'll add back your change. Mikeage 11:47, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Sizes of Chabad vs. the RCA

message: The article claims that "most of the rabbis are modern orthodox" however no citation is provided for this claim.
The opposite might be true: most rabbis now are probably of the center-right. Orthodoxy has been moving rightwards in the recent decades. Many which consider themselves "modern orthodox" would not agree with the RCA being representative of that worldview. 
Please add articles or citations that shed light on the modern orthodoxy of the RCA.
--Daniel E Romero (talk) 09:24, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern Orthodox? 

message: References 1,2 and 3 deal with a suspected sex abuser, sex ebuse and same-sex relations. they are supposed to describe, define and be used as sources for the 2 opening sentences of the RCA entry.
It is like referring the two first sentences of the Chief Rabbinate of Israel entry to former Chief Rabbi Yona Metzger  who was sentenced to four-and-a-half years in prison for his crimes (bribe etc.)
Isn't it a hostile and improper writing?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.64.60.11 (talk) 15:03, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are sex abuse and same-sex relations the proper issues to define the RCA?
Talk:Pentosan polysulphate

message: I've lebelled the first comment as fantasy. The family of CJD sufferer Jonathan Simms talk to the press regularly. The Department of Health does not not sanction pentosan treatment because of the very real risks and doubtful benfit (pentosan has known side-effects and must be administered by injection into the brain) but the Medical Research Council is monitoring patients who are receiving the drug.
Looking at the article, the section about DNA is irrelevant to pentosan polysulfate. It is taken verbatim from the Pentose Sugar web site and I wonder if there is a copyright issue as well. It should be deleted.
Jonathan Silverlight 21:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Forensic psychology

message: — Assignment last updated by Arianamarievasquez (talk) 03:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Psychology Capstone

message: — Assignment last updated by Sfoster33 (talk) 14:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Seminars in Forensic Science
Talk:Winona Ryder

message: Since consensus was established to remove the mention of her marriage to Keanu Reeves, effective as of October 2018, the information is still listed 9 months later. I don't want to appear to be "stepping on toes", but isn't this going to be removed on their respective profiles? Tytrox (talk) 00:15, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for noticing. It was removed by the closing admin at the time, but no-one noticed when it was re-added a few months later. I have removed it again. --Meters (talk) 03:33, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: This is still being added repeatedly, against the RFC consensus at Talk:Winona Ryder/Archive 2#RfC: "Marriage" to Keanu Reeves. Meters (talk) 19:53, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

text: Again, see  Talk:Winona Ryder/Archive 2#RfC: "Marriage" to Keanu Reeves Meters (talk) 03:39, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: "Marriage" to Keanu Reeves still listed

message: The article in its present form has WP:SYN inclusions not supported by the references provided. The statement , “Ryder has described herself as Jewish”,  is not supported by the citations given. Neither is the sensationalist statement, “Most of her family on her father's side were murdered in the Holocaust”, which includes three citations. The first of which does not address the issue at all, while the third states that one relative was killed in a concentration camp. The second,  in fact, states the contrary, “so’s most of my family. My grandparents made it out to America.” Assuming good faith, it was an error on the editor’s part, or perhaps as sometimes is also the case, an attempt to make an unwilling poster child out of a celebrity where facts points otherwise. I have excised the erroneous edits. Please do not revert unless new citations are provided that support such statements WP:BLP. Veritycheck✔️ (talk) 21:59, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of WP:SYN inclusions 

message: She has been accused of sexually abusing Haley Joel Osment in 1999.
Clicking on this link gave me an error. My gut feeling is that it's trolling, but I'm trying to assume good faith. Snowman304|talk 04:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference may not exist
Talk:Amy Gardner

message: This article needs further cleanup from it's previous state, but I've given it a real quick try in ten minutes to help weed it out. I cleaned the most egregious factual errors and trimmed much of the background information about the show and Ms. Parker. 
It is my opinion that Josh and Amy were not dating in the end of S4, but rather started up again in the wake of Zoey's kidnapping; I've left that in until a consensus can be informally reached. 
The article, ideally, should conform to the other character bios in the :Category:The West Wing characters section, where it should eventually be moved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.180.143.248 (talk • contribs) 10:12, 1 March 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The 5.6.7.8's

message: I believe that the band is punctuated as "The 5.6.7.8's"
Can anyone else confirm/change this?
:Yes, I've always seen it punctuated as you say it is, and the 'allmusic' website lists it as that. It's also like that on their 'Bomb The Twist' album - look at it on allmusic.com. The page needs moving! Dragonfly888 00:48, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Why have they got the rogue apostrophe in their name? Lugnuts (talk) 18:07, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punctuation 

message: "The 5.6.7.8's" is an official name. I think that Japanese script is unnecessary in lead text of this article. (If I write it, it will be "ザ・ファイブ・シックス・セブン・エイツ".) --Nightshadow28 18:24, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. I followed the policy of other article. --Nightshadow28 15:05, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese script 
Talk:Algerian Civil War

message: Algeria ok 2A00:23C5:3187:5C01:18E4:1A9A:9C97:ABA7 (talk) 20:54, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Algeria 

message: Algeria is better than morroco , Algeria is better in everything 
For example: football
People are better 
Good is better
Algeria is tenth largest country in the world 
And morroco is tiiiiiiny it’s 58th 2A00:23C5:3187:5C01:18E4:1A9A:9C97:ABA7 (talk) 20:55, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you ten years old ? Grow up 82.64.0.195 (talk) 12:17, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Algeria vs Morroco 

message: French has no official status in Algeria. Remove the French name for the war from the article. Kurdish Elf (talk) 00:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This discussion is one of four essentially identical discussions (1, 2, 3, 4) started today. All of them are on the same theme as previously discussed at length at Talk:Algeria. Unless there is something essentially unique or different pertaining to this article from any of the others, in order to prevent fragmentation and duplication, imho this discussion should continue at Talk:Algeria where it began. Mathglot (talk) 17:32, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove French translation from this article.
Talk:HMS Temeraire

message: Isn't it meant to be HMS Téméraire, not HMS Temeraire?
James F. (talk) 13:16, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a really good question. A random sampling of my navy books seems to suggest that accents are dropped as part of coming into the RN, and it makes sense given the audience (non-French-speaking sailors, for instance), but I don't have anything that that says that in so many words. Stan 14:08, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

text: The French Téméraire translates roughly to 'bold', as I understand it. Benea (talk) 17:06, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name? 

message: Pardon my lack of French. What does the name mean?  Paul, in Saudi (talk) 17:02, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The French Téméraire translates roughly to 'bold', as I understand it. Benea (talk) 17:06, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: name Origin?
Talk:Potez 630

message: This article received the WikiWings award for February 2005 --Rlandmann 13:34, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: I think this article should be split in three parts:
1) Potez 630 (also covering 631 and other fighter projects)
2) Potez 633 (and other bomber projects)
3) Potez 63.11 (also covering 637 and other recon variants).
These three categories have almost entirely different operational careers, and were never mixed within units, so it's rather natural. Objections?
PpPachy 22:01, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd keep a common design/development section but the three variants could be discussed separately in Operational History. - Emt147 Burninate! 23:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  How about entirely different articles? The common development section could be covered in the 630/631 article. PpPachy 13:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: IMHO different articles are good idea. Piotr Mikołajski 16:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  article structure 

message: Are there any surviving examples of this aircraft? PrussianOwl (talk) 07:18, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No, but there is a replica 63-11 being built (perhaps finished by now), in the US based at least partially on original blueprints. - NiD.29 (talk) 22:03, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surviving aircraft
Talk:Fully Integrated Robotised Engine

message: Nice picture, but surely it is copyrighted? Notinasnaid 13:38, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: 
--Aprovera (talk) 21:10, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Upon further research, I found out that there's a 1368cc 8v engine with VVT.http://www.fiatpress.com/press/detail/6900http://www.tezana.pl/files/do%20pobrania/FPTOVERVIEW.pdf The first mention I found from official sources is from 2005, so I put 2005 as start of production. Please note that at this point I'm not even sure there ever was a 1368cc 8v without VVT, as I couldn't find 1.4 8v engines mentioned at all before 2005. For instance, Wiki says that the Fiat Idea used the 1.4 8v engine from 2003, but the Fiat press site doesn't agree. I'm leaving the non-VVT version in the article, though, since I'm not 100% sure about it.
--Aprovera (talk) 09:40, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  1368cc 8v VVT 
Talk:Thermal de Broglie wavelength

message: First, I would suggest that hbar, not h, be used for all wikipedia physics articles.  This is the standard in the physics community, and it tripped me up for a bit when I tried to use a formula from this page.  However, I don't know what convention (if any) has been agreed upon as a wikipedia standard.  Does anyone know where I should look for this?
Second, it appears that the de broglie wavelength quoted in this article for photon is incorrect, but that it would be correct if h were replaced by hbar.  Can someone confirm this? Njerseyguy (talk) 16:46, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we should be flexible on h or hbar, using h when dealing with cyclic frequency, hbar when using angular frequency. One of the most common expressions is E=h\nu, for example. As for the photon thermal wavelength, I believe it is correct as it stands. (i.e. according to Yan and others). Please recheck your source, and if there's still a disagreement, give some explanation. PAR (talk) 00:50, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

text: Thanks for pointing that out. It was erroneously edited yesterday, and I have fixed it. Please check it, ok? PAR (talk) 03:23, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  It looks completely correct, now.  Thanks. DWHalliday (talk) 15:40, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  hbar or h
Talk:Giant

message: Seeing as most of the information on this is testimonial, perhaps some realistic speculation would be appropriate, given that pretense exists for it.  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3328828/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:602:100:DC9C:9C1B:C77D:DEA8:309A (talk) 23:08, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Anywhere else, eg Wikiversity, this would be a good idea. But here sources need to discuss the subject, see WP:NOR and WP:VERIFY. Thanks though. Interesting link. Doug Weller talk 15:46, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Familial gigantism 

message: This entire page refers to all giants as being "mythological creatures", which is dishonest. There is far too much archaeological evidence as well as recorded eyewitness accounts to call it a "myth" on an objective source like Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samechillguy (talk • contribs) 2018-08-05 19:03:18 (UTC)
: then you won't have any problems finding academic sources for the archaeological evidence. Can we please see some? (agh, where are my tildes?)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Doug Weller (talk • contribs) 2018-08-05 20:03 (UTC)
:If you mean gigantism, we have an article on that (to which this one also links).  —PaleoNeonate – 19:40, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: My assumption is that he's referring to "real giants" as supposedly discovered in the headlines listed above under "Giants and their origin" in this talk page. Probably not anything that we need to acknowledge beyond the current "alleged fossil evidence" already in the article.--Ermenrich (talk) 21:04, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mythology" 

message: In the Abrahamic subsection of Religion and Mythology, the sentence "However, the Book of Joshua, describing the actual conquest of Canaan in a later generation, makes no reference to such people living there," is incorrect. The Anakim, identified in the article as "Anakites" are mentioned several times in the Book of Joshua. Joshua 14:12 mentions the Anakim having lived in the Hill country, and Joshua 15:14 mentions that Caleb drove out several descendants of Anak. The Wikipedia article on the Anakim also gives reference to their mention in Joshua 11:22. 173.202.22.94 (talk) 20:05, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abrahamic Inaccuracy
Talk:Oleander (band)

message: It lists the band Nirvana in the "See Also" section and the template at the bottom. What's the connection? I don't see anything mentioned in the article beyond just listing the band twice. That really ought to be explained in the article. Sergecross73 msg me  03:48, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Nirvana
Talk:List of Nigerian poets

message: The list is good but contains only a few of the great number of Nigerian poets. User:212.247.106.203
When Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Ohanyido has been decided then we might want to remove John Pepple Clark, Francis Okechukwu Ohanyido and Paula Iriowen Ohanyido if they are not notable. Thue | talk 17:41, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: Dead Links should not be on the page. If there is no article there should be no names. Please also add dates to the names
*Paula Iriowen Ohanyido
*Diego Odoh Okenyodo
*Ezenwa Ohaeto
*Onyeka Nwelue
*Sola Osofisan
*Francis Ohanyido
*Promise Okekwe 
*Ike Okonta
*Mazui Tonganawa
*Emmanuel Onwi1968-2006
*Ahmed Maiwada
*Austyn Njoku
*Chidi Amaechi
WayneRay 02:43, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reinserted them. Red links (or dead links as you call them) are useful for Wikipedia development purposes. They give an indication of articles that have been written, and those that are yet to be written. See Wikipedia:Lists. --Ezeu 18:11, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead Links

message: I think we should encourage cognitive writing in Nigeria so as to bring cognizance to the people  Majorwriting (talk) 11:10, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cognitive writers 

message: Nigerian contemporary poets should be added to this list regardless of if they have a Wikipedia page or not. Most of them have adequate google visibility. Semilore O (talk) 18:38, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contemporary Poets
Talk:Michael Thompson (Canadian politician)

message: Currently over at the horn (instrument) page under notable horn players a european horn player, Micheal Thompson, is linked here. This page should be turned into a disambiguation. If no one objects I'll take care of it later. Horndude77 00:17, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: Outside of the election results, the body of this article is substantially unsourced. Content under "Political Career'that can't be verified by a reliable source is open to challenge and deletion as per WP:BLP. Flat Out let's discuss it 22:23, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:BLP]] 

message: The Political Career section is mostly uncensored and contains language that is not neutral. I have added a POV tag. Flat Out let's discuss it 21:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
Talk:Donna Upson

message: KC reverted my undoing of the Merge without, apparently, taking notice of the discussion here, with the summary: Why are you going against the consensus established at AFD?. Merge is an editorial action, and the AfD certainly establishes a legitimacy to the Merge, absent objection. But there is objection, and, in particular, no discussion in the Election article, which is going to suffer from a dump of material that violates WP:UNDUE. The AfD did not consider the details, and there was no consensus for Merge. Look at it! I was hoping that discussion here would avoid the need to go to DRV, but unless KC reverts himself or some other editor intervenes, I'll be going to WP:DRV with, I believe, a high chance of getting the result changed to No Consensus (accurate as to the AfD) or Keep, based on clear guidelines. I thought we might avoid the fuss. When all the evidence is examined, this isn't a marginal case, and it satisfies WP:POLITICIAN, if you read the quote from that above. Upson is only partially notable for being a politician. In fact, I wouldn't call her a politician at all.... She was an activist. --Abd (talk) 20:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for suggesting that I do what I already said I'd do if the Merge isn't reverted again. I'll probably wait a day or so.--Abd (talk) 20:56, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert by [[User:Killerofcruft]]

message: I have speedily closed the recent renomination of this article as unquestionably premature.  I would very strongly advise against doing this again until the editors have had some time to make the requested changes to the article.  If there is no significant improvement in, say, one week I could understand throwing it into a debate but not before then (unless Abd indicates that he has finished making the requested changes to the article, and then I will relist it for discussion.  Thank you. Shereth 22:39, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That is what you should have done. (i.e. take it to WP:DRV) DoubleBlue (Talk) 00:23, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

text: At least I can say with a clear conscience that I don't support this woman. GreenJoe 01:06, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you seriously think anybody involved in this discussion can't say the same thing? Bearcat (talk) 01:59, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd deletion nomination 