lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Wally the Green Monster

message: How is this article not NPOV? Màglor 15:30, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Huh?

message: I propose that Wally (mascot) be restored since it was NPOV and this article redirects to it. Yanksox 15:40, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal

message: I didn't think there was an article on Wally, and I wrote this one before finding Wally (mascot). Wally  (mascot) was a two or three sentance stub, and this article was an expansion of it, so I see no reason why we needed both. How was the stub neutral, what specifically isn't neutral in this article. Tell me what needs attention and I'll rewrite. Màglor 15:44, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply

message: Sounds like a plan, combine the two and lets see what happens. Màglor 15:57, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alright

message: I made some significant edits to the page.  My main goal was to separate fact from fiction; that is to say, I wanted to make sure the reader knows both the factual information regarding the mascot and the fictional story behind him and how to distinguish between the two.  I hope this clears things up a bit.  hoopydinkConas tá tú? 17:37, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Overhaul

message: I added the categories. I think this from an earlier version should be included. While not the best reference it's better than nothing. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 05:45, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Category & References

message: As I mentioned at User_talk:Hoopydink, I don't remotely understand that person's reversion.   A subject header, "Biography (from the Red Sox promotions department)" seems an extremely non-standard way to set off quoted and fictional material; if anything, it absolutely blurs the distinction between fiction and reality by presenting the "biography" as fact instead of for what it is, marketing copy from the Red Sox.   I agree it's interesting that they made up this story about 1947, but it shouldn't be presented as anything other than quoted material (unless it isn't a direct quote, in which case it should be rewritten to make it clearer it's fiction).   Pending consensus I believe my edit should be restored.   Cheers, PhilipR 05:58, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just edited the article to hopefully alleviate some of the concerns. hoopydinkConas tá tú? 06:01, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Biography" reversion 

message: In the Wikipedia entry on the wall for which Wally is named, its height is given as 37 feet 2 inches. In the introduction here the height is given as 37 feet 6 inches. This should be resolved. Dick Kimball (talk) 12:57, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Green Monster (wall) 

message: Wally was the 2011 All Star Game Mascot Home Run Derby Champion, and looks to repeat
 despite T.C. Bear and Raymond's claims to having the 2012 title already in the bag.
This could use an update. The 2013 All Star Game Champ should be known by the time anyone reads this. Dick Kimball (talk) 13:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  All Star Game Mascot Home Run Derby Champion
Talk:Victoria Hotel, Beeston

message: In response to the notability tag, aren't the awards won by the pub (including a national award by The Times newspaper) both proof or notability and sources of evidence>? Robertsteadman 15:44, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It didn't win it, it was runner-up... but even if it had, unless there's some kind of historical notability to the place I'm strongly tempted to list it on articles for deletion anyway and see what the wider view is. No offence to whoever runs it. - Motor (talk) 15:50, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine but I think it deserves an article - 166 years old and all those awards, a story of rrestoration and regeneration.... its inclusion in Harden's Top Restaurant listings is a sign of notability.... Nottingham Evening Post – Pub Of The Year 1995, Nottinghamshire Dining Pub Of The Year – Good Pub Guide 2002, Nottingham CAMRA Pub Of Excellence Award Feb 2003, The Times – Pub Of The Year , Runner-Up 2000 - all worthy of notability in my book - there are many far less notable things on Wikipedia.... Robertsteadman 16:02, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a very well-known pub in the East Midlands area (rather than just locally), and I believe the headquarters of Tynemill who are a serious player in establishing pubs with a florishing clientele and good beers. - MightyWarrior 19:54, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability tag
Talk:Rod Rutherford

message: Does this meet the criteria for non-notability?  He is a quarterback that is that has a good chance to make an NFL team.  In addition, he was a starting quarterback at a major division I team.  I don't this article meets the criteria for speedy deletion.  It does need to be cleaned up, though, and I will try to do this.Patken4 15:48, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:San Millán de la Cogolla

message: I now think I made a mistake when I created this article by including "La Rioja" in the title.  I had assumed this would avoid an ambiguity, but I now think the words are superfluous
--Alan 15:54, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: yes, it is superfluous. --Tresckow 05:09, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The monastery should get its own article. just like on de:wp and es:wp.--Tresckow 05:09, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Own Article
Talk:Life in a Tin Can

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.columbia.edu/~brennan/beegees/72.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.   — CactusWriter (talk) 18:32, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:New York State Route 380

message: I noticed decomissioned was changed to deleted in the infobox due to the fact that decomisisoned is a neologism. For starters, this may or may not be true, but the route was not deleted, per se, it was just removed from state control. Deleted implies the route no longer exists. Smartyllama 19:28, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You may have better success if you post this comment at WT:USRD instead. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 20:06, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

text: The route no longer exists. --NE2 21:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decomissioned vs. deleted 

message: I have added a photo of the approximate former southern terminus of NY 380. Feel free to edit anything you want about it (size, positioning, caption, etc.). Skudrafan1 (talk) 18:18, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Southern terminus photo 

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#:: 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#:: 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#:: 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#It is stable.
#:No edit wars etc.: 
#:: 
#It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
#:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass/Fail: 
#:: </div>
Good job! —Rob (talk) 19:30, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Convert templates are done. As per your other issue, NY 380 is gone, making this irrelevant in most ways, but when it existed, not really.Mitch32contribs 19:30, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Makes sense. Looks good. Thanks! —Rob (talk) 19:34, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA review
Talk:New York State Route 38

message: This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 06:36, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: USRD GA audit
Talk:New York State Route 60

message: This article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary.Fwgoebel 05:03, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of Intersection Template 
Talk:New York State Route 80

message: According to NYSDOT route logs from 1970, 2004, 2009, 2012 and 2017, the western terminus is at NY 173. However, NYSDOT inventory files and most maps show it as NY 175. The NY 175 terminus is supported by Google Street View imagery from 2015. There's no indication that the terminus was changed recently; the route logs are consistent with each other and probably erroneous. ESRoads (talk) 16:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Western terminus
Talk:New York State Route 430

message: This article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary. Fwgoebel 00:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of Intersection Template 

message: According to markers, 430 now continues south through Jamestown on what had been 951C on Washington Street then continues farther south with NY-60 to a point which I didn't see. This is new enough that I can't find any evidence on the NYSDOT website, in Google Street View, or in The Post-Journal archives; naturally, though, AARoads is all over it with a photo (on 5th at Lafayette) posted less than two weeks ago as I write this. Granted, that's now two examples of original research and nothing else, but it's enough to keep an eye out for official changes/reliable sources. Mapsax (talk) 16:03, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rerouted in Jamestown
Talk:Theme restaurant

message: Is Hooters a theme restaurant? As per the article the "food usually takes a backseat to the presentation of the theme". Ewlyahoocom 16:13, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hooters?

message: Ridiculous to call it the prototype. Tiki bars go back to the 1930s. I think I'm going to mod that bit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.195.228 (talk) 03:59, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rainforest Cafe 

message: As stated at Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists, Wikipedia:Notability#Stand-alone lists and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists#Adding individual items to a list:-
# All lists must have clearly defined inclusion criteria
# Every entry should meet the notability criteria for its own article.  Red-linked entries are acceptable if the entry is verifiably a member of the list, and it is reasonable to expect an article could be forthcoming in the future.  This prevents indiscriminate lists, and prevents individual lists from being too large to be useful to readers.
# Editors may, at their discretion, choose to limit large lists by only including entries for independently notable items or those with Wikipedia articles.
# All items on the list must follow Wikipedia's core content policies of Verifiability (through good sources in the item's one or more references), No original research, and Neutral point of view
So to summarise:-A) - All redlinks, without a verifiable citation, should be removedB) -  Entries with a citation (there is only one) should only remain if it is reasonable to expect an article could be forthcoming.
Personally, I would like to "limit the list to entries with a Wikipedia articles", and eliminate all redlinks - as point 3 above - but unlike A and B above - that needs consensus.The "clean-up list template" was added on 10 March, so I will start clean the list up shortly. - Arjayay (talk) 16:11, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion criteria
Talk:Heliamphora tatei

message: "H. tatei is one of the few Heliamphora species to actually produce digestive enzymes."
:Needs a citation. The latest information I have from 1992 says that H. tatei was capable of hydrolytic activity, but under laboratory conditions the researchers couldn't detect proteolytic activity. And they're not sure if the activity comes from the plant producing the enzymes itself or from surface bacteria. --Rkitko (talk) 22:28, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentence moved from article 
Talk:Richard Taylor (Confederate general)

message: Suggest deleting reference to Taylor's European education. There is no reference to any such education in Parrish's excellent biography. There are numerous second hand reports and rumors Taylor studied in Europe, but no evidence. User:Mpleahy 13:05, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested deletion 

message: Someone vandalized the article, adding bogus information about Taylor leading a soccer team, and altering his date of death. I undid those changes, returning it to the state left by Scott Mingus. Agoodall 19:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. In case you're new to Wikipedia, vandalism reversion is not something we typically document in the Talk page. Just provide an Edit summary (which can be as simple as "rvv".) Hal Jespersen 00:14, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrected vandalism 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 05:52, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Richard Taylor (general) →  – Richard Taylor (British Army officer) was also a general, as was Richard R. Taylor, so this appears to be insufficient disambiguation. This title should point to Richard Taylor#Military. BD2412 T 03:33, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 August 2021
Talk:Nîmes–Alès–Camargue–Cévennes Airport

message: The article states that this airport serves the Provence region. However, Nîmes is located in the Languedoc-Rousillon region. Therefore, this region as well as west Provence, much benefited by its closeness to the airport, are equally well served by it.
201.239.126.11 (talk) 16:47, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Provence region 

message: This is totally back-to-front. It is situated in the village of Garons near the much larger town of St-Gilles. Some 30 years ago, when I lived in St-Gilles, there was an attempt to have the name of the town included in the title but this was refused, owing to French standard naming rules.  Williamgeorgefraser 17:46, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Position of Airport
Talk:Joel Rifkin

message: The "popular culture" section has two contradictory statements:
"One of the names she proposes is ironically O.J. (in this case after Buffalo Bills running back O.J. Simpson)[2]"
"The suggestion that Elaine's friend change his name to O.J. was inspired by Ottis James (O.J.) Anderson, of the New York Giants who Elaine and company were going to see later in the episode." --ParkerWolf (talk) 06:57, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular culture 

message: Nassau Community College has no dorms because it is a 2 year junior college. Therefore Joel could not have "lived on campus" as entered. My source is: I went to Nassau Community College and there isn't, nor has there ever been, any on campus housing facilities.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.72.32.236 (talk) 04:06, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it, as there was nothing to back it up. Even if it could be cited, it seems trivial anyway. Doc talk 06:08, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nassau Community College 

message: " He attended religious classes at the Sholem Aleichem Folk School, run by a secular group of Jews who did not believe in God." - This doesn't exactly make sense PerfectClean (talk) 21:50, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Odd religious class statement
Talk:Great Central League

message: Was it Minor League?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.234.127.101 (talk) 16:40, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: IP User 192.104.203.137 suggested a possible source, if anyone has the time to check it out.
-- Pemilligan (talk) 17:41, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible source
Talk:Chicago school (sociology)

message: "Thomas defined social disorganisation as "the inability of a neighbourhood to solve its problems together" which suggested a level of social pathology and personal disorganisation, so the term, "differential social organisation" was preferred by many, and may have been the source of Sutherland's (1947) Differential Association Theory"
Is this fair to say? I was under the impression that the term differential social organisation came into usage in light of the work of sutherland rather than the other way around. Im open to being wrong but would like clarification if it is out there. Martinq22 (talk) 18:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differential social organisation 

message: "Originally, Chicago was a clean slate, an empty physical environment."  This line seems fairly offensive.  The presence of Native Americans must be taken into consideration.  Reword? 131.111.185.88 (talk) 22:45, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Clean Slate" 

message: may not be a aka term for the chicago school  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.27.181.254 (talk) 23:03, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ecological School 

message: The inclusion of an epigraph called "conclusions" is not very wiki-like, and reveals that this may be a work written by someone with academic-expository purposes (I mean "homework", of course). NiKo-TiNa (talk) 06:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conclusions? 

message: — Assignment last updated by ImagineWorldPeace (talk) 18:32, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Political Sociology
Talk:Gorre & Daphetid

message: I changed things like "John often commented..."  to "Allen often commented..." per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies), this is discouraged because "The use of the first name gives the impression that the writer knows the subject personally, which, even if true, is not relevant." --rogerd 16:52, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of first name 

message: I removed several passages which were opinionated in nature, also it is not necessary to include street addresses of residencies. -- Harvey Henkelmann (talk) 05:27, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinionated content 
Talk:Nimrod (comics)

message: I removed the reference to Nicholas Damiano, because that wasn't an alias of Nimrod. Damiano was a separate character who took in Rachel when she arrived in the past. He was killed by Selene. Nimrod's human alias was simply "Nimrod." --JamesAM 16:52, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

message: under the headline Decimation,It is mentioned nimrod was looking for its creator,Forge.Forge!why would the techno mutant create a mutant hunting super-robot??
Hence,I've changed the tine "whom the nimrod believed was its creator."
Nimrod on the cross looks like Lilith?
This doesn't really need to be added to the article, but I was just wondering if anybody saw a similarity between Nimrod on the Cross and Lilith from Neon Genesis Evangelion on the cross? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:2ndAngelLilith.jpg
:It could easily be taken as a reference, considering NGE was, at the time the story was written and published, at a height of popularity and exposure in the US thanks to airings on Adult Swim.  You're right in not adding it to the article, though, since it's never been explicitly stated to be a direct reference; it could just as easily be a simple Christian allegory (which, of course, was at the heart of NGE as well). -- Pennyforth 12:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As to Forge being Nimrod's creator. I just reread the TBP New X-Men this is referring to, and I did not get the idea that Forge created Nimrod, but rather that in a different timeline, Nimrod forced Forge to repair him by threatening Forge's wife, Ororo, and their child. Maybe I need to reread it again, and Nimrod did seem confused and incoherent at times, so maybe I missed the reference. --rbprx1204  —Preceding comment was added at 06:30, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion : Nimrod's creator 
Talk:Permanent Committee for Scholarly Research and Ifta

message: Article needs to say what the committee is in the first line (and bold it). MP   (talk) 17:01, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for letting me know more about the standard formatting of wikipedia articles. I have taken made the change as you recommended.  I think it greatly improves the article. ZaydHammoudeh 22:33, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition

message: S.A.,
a very interesting summary on this most important jurisprudencial institution within the Islamic world. Clearly these most highly qualified judges are making such excellent and purely motivated work in the name of our Lord, which can be witnessed on the webpage listed in the main article.
However, there seems to be a sense of imbalance as to the scope of application within the Muslim world of the fiqh and fatwa taken by the PC, as the judges all seem to be appointed by the currently reigning king of Saudi Arabia. A friendly reminder that Islamic fiqh is more than Salafi-Wahhabi judgement and interpretation could be in order here.
At the end of the day, Islam will indeed be in need of a kind of "Supreme Court" in which all Islamic madhhabs - the four Sunni (Hanafi, Shafií, Maliki Hanbali), the three Shi'ite (Zaidi, Ismaili and Twelvers) and even the remaining Ibadis (Kharijis) will have to be included, and the fatwas and other legal positions taken will have to be reconcilable within all madhhab.
If the Permanent Committee wants to establish themselves as the supreme instance for fiqh, fatwa, and other legal questions on Islam, they will have to decentralise and incorporate the remaining madhhabs within Islam.  
"And if two parties of the believers quarrel, make peace between them; but if one of them acts wrongfully towards the other, fight that which acts wrongfully until it returns to Allah's command; then if it returns, make peace between them with justice and act equitably; surely Allah loves those who act equitably. " Qur'an 49:9
--Musa Emre (talk) 23:12, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Islamic Supreme Court
Talk:Hypostomus

message: I changed "*Hypostomus robinii - Teta" to "*Hypostomus robinii " since the teta link connects to a totall none fish page.HappyVR 17:05, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: removal

message: Maybe this should be moved to WikiSpecies as it is just a collection of red links. --Tobes 10:13, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: er no. The article is tagged as a fish stub. I will expand it later assuming no one does it first. I appreciate your point about the red links - I find these annoying - somebody has added the links but not made any of the pages linked. If you want remove the links to just leave a list. Plus wikipecies already has this [].HappyVR 13:39, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Interwikki move