lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Warrior Knights

message: I just started this article yesterday.  I plan to expand and add some external links this evening when I can look up exact URLs, in particular to the company's official web site and to its article on BoardGameGeek.com. Schoop 16:31, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Despite Shady18n's comment above from a year ago, no notability has been established in the article's lead. --Bejnar (talk) 18:05, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability Tag
Talk:Ottery St Mary

message: The Weasleys in Ottery St. Catchpole are continually banishing gnomes from their garden, just as pixies were banished from Ottery St. Mary. Erudil 16:33, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pixies and Gnomes

message: Has it been sold yet ? -- John (Daytona2 ·  Talk ·  Contribs) 23:11, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Chanter's House
Talk:DeRuyter, New York

message: There are discrepancies in the physical land area of this town and its total population. Please fix the numbers. hello (talk) 13:41, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancies 

message: De Ruyter was not Michiels given name (which was "Adriaenszoon", or "son of Adriaen"), but an honourary name which he took on as his own. It doesn't mean "the rider" (although in modern Dutch "ruiter" does mean that) but is old-Dutch for "raider" (verb: "ruijten" or "ruyten").  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roeinerd (talk • contribs) 23:04, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of "de Ruyter" 
Talk:Avalanche snow bridge

message: When writing the Snow bridge article I was surprized to learn that this term has another meaning, not so common, and apparently missing from wikipedia as well. Laudak 16:40, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article history

message: Merge with (into) snow shed under the latter name. Peter Horn 02:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:31 Combat Engineer Regiment (The Elgin's)

message: Why called "The Elgins?" Wachholder 16:44, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Amphol Lumpoon

message: Is it Lampoon or Lumpoon? wcf Facts are stubborn. Comments? 17:47, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Google hits don't seem to significantly prefer either specific spelling; both could probably be mentioned. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mispelling?
Talk:Metro Transit (Madison)

message: Should we get both for this article? A photo of a bus and a digitized logo? 66.168.19.135 (talk) 04:09, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo / Logo 

message: Route 15 also serves the far west side.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.168.19.135 (talk) 04:16, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route 15 

message: Should we add a section on Metro Plus?  It seems to be a growing service.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pgadke (talk • contribs) 05:26, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small Bus Unit (Metro Plus) 

message: Maybe it wouldn't be a bad idea to move the bus route list to its own page like how the MCTS or the Metro Transit (MN) pages are set up, but the route list should be kept as it is keeping with the standard established setup for transit pages. Packerfan386 (talk) 00:50, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bus Routes 

message: From what I know, back in the late 20th Century AD, Madison Metro used to give routes letters instead of numbers for names. Is it relevant to mention the history of bus routes and how they have been named (meaning in the Madison Metro article)? Cbsteffen (talk) 03:44, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bus Route Names
Talk:Avalanche net

message: When writing Avalanche snow bridge I noticed that the whole avalanche control topic is underdeveloped in wikipedia. Laudak 17:00, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article life
Talk:Gadolinium(III) nitrate

message: Are there some numerical values tables available of conductivity (electrolytic) of this salt in both water and heavy water to be include in the article?--188.27.144.144 (talk) 10:20, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conductivity of (heavy) water solutions of this salt 
Talk:Francis Trevithick

message: http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/yourpaintings/paintings/francis-trevithick-london-and-north-western-railway-holding9597
©Geni 21:53, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice. What's its copyright/licensing status? --Redrose64 (talk) 23:21, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well assuming painted from life which seams likely it must be at least 135 years old which means we would have to be quite unluckly for the painting not to be in the public domain.©Geni 23:32, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Its copyright status doesn't matter. It's in a UK national museum, which almost certainly means they'll claim to own the copyright, even when they don't. Even though the UK doesn't recognise simple mechanical reproduction of a 2D artwork as creating a new copyright, they will still claim this. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:30, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: possible pic

message: Most probably Tehidy Estate - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tehidy_Country_Park 212.159.44.170 (talk) 12:30, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trehidy Estate
Talk:Hospitalism

message: It seems to me that this has much to do with the concept of Anaclitic depression, and the two pages may benefit from merging. Pthag 17:17, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merger seems reasonable.  I'm going to be bold.  A quick google search suggests that "hospitalism" is the more commonly used term so I'm going to point the redirect in that direction for now.  Thanks.  Rossami (talk) 21:23, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: I did a quick search and anaclitic depression is (for some) a suggested subtype of depression: anaclitic and introjective depression. 
I am a little concerned that, to the reader, the redirect suggests the terms hospitalism and anaclitic are identical. Which I think is not the case. 
Source:  Blatt & Luyten (2009) Sidney J. Blatt & Patrick Luyten (2009) Depression as an Evolutionarily Conserved Mechanism to Terminate Separation Distress: Only Part of the Biopsychosocial Story?, Neuropsychoanalysis, 11:1, 52-61, DOI: 10.1080/15294145.2009.10773594
Quote1: 
Extensive research (see summaries in Blatt, 2004; Blatt & Zuroff, 1992; Luyten, Corveleyn, & Blatt, 2005) documents the validity of the anaclitic–introjective distinction [...]
Quote2: 
studies from several strands of research, including both psychodynamic and cognitive-behavioral approaches, over several decades, have identified two fundamental dimensions in depression (Arieti & Bemporad, 1978, 1980; Beck, 1983, 1999; Blatt, 1974, 1998, 2004; Blatt, D’Afflitti & Quinlan, 1976; Blatt, Quinlan, Chevron, McDonald, & Zuroff, 1982): an anaclitic1 dimension and an introjective2 dimension (Blatt & Maroudas, 1992). The anaclitic dimension involves feelings of loneliness, abandonment, and neglect, emphasized in the research on “simple depression.” In contrast, the introjective dimension involves feelings of failure, worthlessness, and guilt, as emphasized in research on melancholic depression and manic-depressive psychosis.
Hypochonda (talk) 11:40, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Hypothesis: Anaclitic depression = subtype of depression ?
Talk:European Union energy label

message: Added information from changes passed in May 2010. Ben.fox.copywriter (talk) 17:30, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

message: I changed the data for light bulbs (diff), including the tabulated percentages:
The old percentages were, apparently, copied from http://www.energy.eu/focus/energy-label.php , but the values there are different from the official EU directive. Can anybody confirm that the 98/11/EU directive is the latest status? Han-Kwang (t) 21:23, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Light bulbs 

message: :a television with a diagonal of 82 cm (32 in) has a screen area A = 64 dm2
This example isn't in the EU regulation.  Perhaps dm^2 should be spelled out as square decimetres?  But how do you reach 64?  If it's a 9:4 aspect ratio, that's about 720mm x 320mm, which is more like 22 dm^2  --78.145.16.92 (talk) 14:26, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, I wrote that example, and it looks like I had a brainfart. For a 16:9 ratio, you would have 4.0x7.1 dm^2 = 28.7 dm2. I corrected the article. I'm not sure what you mean to say by 'this example isn't in the EU regulation'. Han-Kwang (t) 14:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Television example

message: I would like the article to explain how this is implemented.
What is the specific role of the governments in setting the standards,
testing the items, enforcing the labeling, etc. What entities, public
and private, are involved? Also, how is all of that funded?Dicirnah (talk) 19:08, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Implementation 

message: "For refrigerating appliances, such as refrigerators, freezers, wine-storage appliances, and combined appliances, the labelling is specified in terms of an energy efficiency index EEI, which is an indication of the annual power consumption relative to a reference consumption that is based on the storage volume and the type of appliance (refrigerator or freezer)."
Are they trying to say that an A++ fridge/freezer, with the same capacity, will be as efficient in Spain as it is in England?
Quoting an annual power usage for a fridge is ridiculous! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.25.94.142 (talk) 17:26, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Nonesense!

message: In March 2007, this edit included the addition of the clause "the drum capacity in kilogrammes". That was the first time that unit was used in the article, and subsequent additions used the same variety of English. That then would seem to be the baseline by which we can apply MOS:RETAIN, which states:  That is why I reverted this edit. -- DeFacto (talk). 14:50, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The correct spelling is kilogram. Or rather, that spelling is recognized in all variants, and is therefore preferred.  Dondervogel 2 (talk) 12:49, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling variety 

message: It seems to me that diswashers part swapped new and old labeling. They used to hava A+++ etc, but according to new rules there should only be A-G letters. BUt the article states otherwise. Gorn (talk) 21:16, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dishwasheres really suspicious
Talk:List of schools in Croydon

message: Can I suggest this is moved to :List of schools in the London Borough of Croydon. This is because:
#there is an entity named :Croydon, and it should be clear this refers to :London Borough of Croydon.
#consistency with other London boroughs, for example see List of schools in the London Borough of Enfield.
HTH Kbthompson 17:44, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand, but I would rather it kept here because of the template reads Schools in Croydon, and although that's not it, I would rather it to differ. This article is not just a list of schools but also has some information on it, unlike List of schools in the London Borough of Enfield. Pafcool2 15:40, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see, Pafcool2, that you've now edited the template – good move. In the interests of consistency, I support the page being moved as proposed. – Lincolnite (talk) 21:39, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pagename

message: HELP us at Wikiproject Schools, and see Template:Schools in Croydon (for correct names), to create more articles on the Primary schools in Croydon. For correct layout see either Park Hill Junior School (with picture) or South Norwood Primary School (without picture). Thank You. Pafcool2 15:44, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary Schools in Croydon 

message: See the edit history for information. I have since changed the edits. Pafcool2 18:08, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits made on the 3rd of October 
Talk:Bretton Hall, West Yorkshire

message: I really enjoyed my time here. - Reece.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.16.251 (talk) 16:41, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Such a shame 
Talk:European Commissioner for Energy

message: Please see Talk:List of European Commission portfolios.- J.Logan`t: 20:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While researching some other stuff on this topic, I encountered to different persons referred to as the European Commissioner for Energy during Juncker Commission from 2014 to 2019 - Maroš Šefčovič and Miguel Arias Cañete. As I understand it, in Juncker Commission there was no Commissioner for Energy, but rather two of them, each concerned with slightly different aspect of EU's energy policies. Wouldn't it thus be better if both of them were mentioned in this article rather than only Cañete? Also link from Šefčovič's page leads here, so there is definitely an inconsistency there. Since I know basically nothing about structures in EU's administration I won't make any changes to the article myself, but someone should probably look into it. Also, if I'm completely wrong and I've only wasted your time, I apologize.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vachaj (talk • contribs) 19:35, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Šefčovič or Cañete in Juncker Commission?
Talk:Great Tea Race of 1866

message: The article states a bonus of one pound per ton. The newspaper quote states a bonus of 10 shillings per ton.
20 shillings = 1 pound. QED.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.215.196.53 (talk) 06:05, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory Info 

message: According to the last line of the article, "The Taeping was carrying 767 tons and 1,108,709 pounds of tea."  What do these figures actually mean?  1,108,709 pounds (weight) is just short of 495 tons, so was the ship carrying 1262 tons of tea?  Or was it carrying 495 tons of tea and 767 tons of other cargo?  On the other hand, if the number is meant to be the value of the tea, that works out at 12/10 per pound, which seems _very_ expensive for 1866.  Does this statement have a source? Tevildo (talk) 13:32, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cargo figures 

message: You should know about this and comment.  One of our editors has systematically depopulated it (perhaps from this article among many others), and thinks that is a good reason to delete it. 13:34, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Contested deletion [[Category talk:Yachting races]]
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Giovanni33-John Smith's/Evidence

message: I trust that the Committee will also take these assertions with a grain of salt.  While Giovanni33 seems to want to call John Smith's a "Probable Puppeteer," let it be shown that, in fact, John Smith's was NOT linked to the mysterious Hungarian IPs, as stated in his Suspected Sock Puppet case here.  It seems more than a little misleading and disingenuous on Giovanni's part to portray that as "probable" sockpuppeteering, when John was judged to have no connection to those other users.  Regarding the assertions of edit warring and incivility, this seems to be a clear case of WP:KETTLE, so again, I plead for grains of salt with this, since it seems that even if John stays within the rules, Giovanni assumes bad faith and accuses him of malfeasance.
:Nanking Massacre--Same edit warring, multiple reverts in the course of a day:
:So as not to break 3RR he waits a day and reverts 3 more times:
:This goes on until the article gets protected by admin Deskana.
So, while my post here is not evidence in and of itself, I feel that it needs to be said, so as to offer a bit in the way of balance.
Respectfully submitted,
--Folic Acid 17:40, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding Giovanni33's evidence

message: Regarding the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Giovanni33-John Smith's/Evidence#I am not a puppet-master comment by John Smith's: it is impossible to be 'absolved' of sockpuppetry unless you appear in person with the user you are accused of being. The closing admin, Akhilleus, made his judgement based on the evidence provided, determining it was not strong enough to show you were Foula or the "Hungarian IPs". So we can assume good faith that you are not a puppeteer, but comments by any one of  admins are in no way the be-all-and-end-all. Picaroon (t) 18:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I changed the statement - I hope it's more appropriate now. John Smith's 19:00, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Are we one admin short of 1337? I had the privilege to become the 420th admin (all desysoping  accounted for). Naturally, chaos ensued. El_C 19:11, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding "I am not a puppet-master"
Talk:Baldwin's rules

message: —Preceding unsigned comment added by Walkerma (talk • contribs) 06:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree. I think it's exo too. Chris  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.222.42.105 (talk) 12:10, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

message: The 6-endo-tet illustration has one curly arrow in the wrong place, it actually depicts 6-exo-tet now. A 6-endo-tet process would involve cleavage of other bond in the cyclopropane and formation of a 7-membered ring. 79.100.250.119 (talk) 22:06, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree it looks weird. My original drawing was based on several K.C.Nicolaou's papers on epoxide cyclisation, where he called these 6-endo. See e.g. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 5330-533. I've removed the controversial cyclopropanes and drew 6-endo-tet as originally suggested by Baldwin. If you can find a published example of cyclopropane opening being called, e.g., 7-endo-tet, please let me know. kovsky (talk) 14:11, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction suggestion 

message: The last diagram in the "Applications" section does arrow pushing from a completely irrelevant methalene carbon instead of starting both arrows at the lone pair of the BOC protected nitrogen group where the actual nucleophilic attack is occurring from. 149.155.222.31 (talk) 12:03, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I just uploaded a replacement image. Does it look correct now? DMacks (talk) 15:52, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good to me (albeit rather simplified). kovsky (talk) 22:10, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Minor Correction suggestion
Talk:Max Werner

message: This article is supposed to be about a Dutch drummer called Max Werner (it also says at the end: "this stub about a drummer etc. etc.". However, someone is using it to share information about an American artist with the same name.
Please don't use this page for info about other people with the same name. If you like, you can create a new item...Doefie 17:54, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Luník IX

message: www.lunik9.sk is invalid URL...
Lkovac (talk) 16:01, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

message: :It works now. It is a web page of Salesians at Luník 9. --Viliam Búr (talk) 07:49, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Impulsion

message: Requested move/dated|Impulsion
Impulsion (horse) →  –
* Support as nominator.  Page disambiguated without need, a hatnote can direct people to the Impulse page. Montanabw(talk) 21:39, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 

message: I've moved the article to Impulsion per the above archived discussion.  Dreadstar ☥  04:26, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, and thank you also for fixing the dabs.  Montanabw(talk) 22:45, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved

message: A while ago, I made an edit to this article to shorten a quote.  The original text stated: 
*"The USEF states, 'Impulsion is the term used to describe the transmission of an eager and energetic, yet controlled propulsive energy generated from the hindquarters into the athletic movement of the horse.'"
:I altered it to read
*"The USEF states that impulsion is 'the transmission of an eager and energetic, yet controlled propulsive energy generated from the hindquarters into the athletic movement of the horse.'"
My intention was to remove the phrase "term used to describe" which seems like unnecessary fluff.  User:Montanabw has opposed this edit on the grounds that this phrase may be an important part of the quote.  I can't think of a situation where "term used to describe" in a definition wouldn't be fluff.  I also feel like my alteration made the sentence flow better.  What do others think? — Æµ§œš¹ [ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ] 17:50, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if anyone out there cares, please note that the USEF doesn't say "impulsion IS" they say "impulsion is the term", so changing a direct quote is what is involved here.  I don't know if they consider that difference to be significant or if they simply are not the perfect genius expert grammarian that Aeusoes1 is and just added "fluff." But I think it matters that we are using a direct quotation and there really isn't an argument to potentially change the meaning.  See WP:SYNTH.  And FWIW, I consider overuse of the word "that" to also be poor grammar that interrupts flow.  Montanabw(talk) 20:48, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Does my change introduce such an overuse of that? — Æµ§œš¹ [ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ] 21:07, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a style question and your use is poor style. It's not a sin against humanity, just one of those minor things "that" are nice to avoid.  But frankly, let's just let this sit for a bit and see if anyone else cares.  I have other fish to fry. Montanabw(talk) 19:58, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Quote modification
Talk:Stephen Fabian

message: Is this the same Stephen Fabian who illustrated the Manual of the Planes (1987)? See also  67.173.11.90 (talk) 01:21, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Going to go out on a limb and say this is the same guy... 67.173.11.90 (talk) 05:42, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Avalanche control

message: A most immediate chain of events that have led to me writing this article starts from my article snow bridge, which directed me to the underdeveloped but fertile topic of avalanche defenses. Laudak 18:11, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article life

message: I think this is a great place to drop my ideas for Wiki Disaster Management for avalanches. Any objections to structuring the article around:
Risk and Hazard Assessment: identifying avalanche terrain, and its consequences
Prevention and Mitigation: active and passive techniques, and the cycle of observing and controlling snow pack evolution
Response and Recovery: the equipment and methods for searching, rescuing, and evacuating of avalanche victims
Finally we could then reduce the size of the equivalent sections in the main avalanche page
Insightaction (talk) 05:47, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Structuring
Talk:So Haunt Me

message: Is there one? Worth mentioning I'd say - if there is one, say when it was released. If not, say that too. 86.143.51.27 (talk) 19:44, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  VHS/DVD release? 

message: Surely some mention has to be made of this programme being utter shite?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.169.95.200 (talk) 10:20, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most unfunny programme ever