lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sam Moa

message: 
Samuela Moa →  — Commonly used name, also club website. 81.142.107.230 (talk) 15:06, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections made, uncontroversial. Moved. billinghurst sDrewth 13:57, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Vaea Falemaka

message: Joseph? Londo06 10:01, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Penelope Fillon

message: What's the reason for deleting this article? Malecasta 16:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penelope Fillon. It fails WP:BIO notability criteria.--Mais oui! 16:53, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Steven Starr

message: I've removed the  tag from the article (and from this talk page, where it didn't belong in the first place) as the tone seems fairly reasonable to me.  If there's a problem with this article, it seems more likely to be a matter of notability, and should, if necessary, be settled on AfD.  —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 18:44, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement?
Talk:Al Robbins

message: Wouldn't it be pertinent to note that in the pilot, this role was filled by a different actor? --75.2.57.228 16:50, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The role of Al Robbins didn't exist in the pilot; there was a different M.E. for the first few episodes. Editus Reloaded 10:13, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sissy Löwinger

message: When makin this articles I wrote down when editting, what sources: sources:IMDB, AEIOU, http://www.noen.at/redaktion/stolznoe/article.asp?Text=145026&cat=860,http://www.magwien.gv.at 
It were the same ones I used in the German article about this Austrian actors, because I made the German article and then translated it into English. I didn't use any English sources!
--Ricky59 16:51, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Day of the Youth Combatant

message: I propose that Day of the Young Combatant be merged into Day of the Youth Combatant. They refer to the same day. Lenerd (talk) 02:48, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. The articles are escenbtially the same. Dentren | Talk 16:12, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Carved stone balls

message: Mentioned in:
* Carved stone balls #Materials / 2nd paragraph and
* Carved stone balls #Ornamentation / 4th paragraph.
In Towie (disambiguation) there are several articles mentioned.
Which one is meant?
Answer:
1st: The caption under the photo says "Towie in Aberdeenshire".
2nd: The main contribution in Talk:Carved stone balls/Archive 1 #"You don't say" / list elements "8" to "10" mention the same "Towie in Aberdeenshire".
Ping welcome, Steue (talk) 11:05, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which 'Towie'? 

message: My first guess was: a ball for throwing:
* either in a game, kind of a forerunner of the British, and later American, Football
* or as a weapon.
But since I heard (in a TV documentation) that the Towie balls ( from Aberdeenshire ) are from a very fragile kind of stone, my guesses are:
* as a symbol of power, for the leader/king, and/or
* as a kind of ID ( Seal (emblem) ), for messengers ( Couriers or Messenger of the Court ), carrying messages from one king to an other king, as they were later used in combination with a sealing wax.
Re. other suggestions:
* as a weapon they would not be decorated.
* fishers would, very likely, not decorate their weights.
* in the working of hides:taking a piece of leather and filling it with stones, sand or earth would be much easier/faster, even more so if such pieces of leather were available in ample quantity.
* ball bearings for transporting larger stones:
** would, very likely, not be decorated; plus:
** ball bearings with knobs don't roll well, :).
Ping welcome, Steue (talk) 11:57, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Function, my guesses
Talk:David Russell Hulme

message: Can anyone add any more published references about Hulme?  Best regards, -- Ssilvers 17:03, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs birthdate and more references

message: David Russell Hulme wrote to me, "...in my Wikipedia entry you refer to me as Hulme. Would you mind changing it so that it always reads Russell Hulme (but with no hyphen!)? Both names are family surnames...."  -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:30, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Surname(s)
Talk:Squall line

message: A reader supplied an image which may be useful for this page.
:File:Squall_line_Springfield_IL.jpg--SPhilbrick(Talk) 18:06, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed that part of the cloud is labeled "shell cloud" in that graphic. I think that is supposed to be "shelf" cloud. 65.35.103.170 (talk) 17:56, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Text corrected. Pierre cb (talk) 22:48, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of squall line 
Talk:Volodyovski

message: End of June 1901.Tigerboy1966 (talk) 02:43, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Papers
Talk:Voter's oath or affirmation

message: This article now says:
: In November 2002, the Vermont General Assembly amended the language of the oath
: 
But this is part of the constitution of the state, so it cannot be changed by a mere act of the ordinary legislature. Perhaps the legislature proposed the change, which the voters then had to approve? Michael Hardy (talk) 20:41, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who changed this in 2002? It could not have been the legislature alone.
Talk:Ian Thorpe false start controversy

message: The reference need fixing, some of them are blank.  Tayquan hollaMy work 17:21, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Ford Models Supermodel of the World

message: Regarding Supermodel 1996:
Hello guys, I included a link which show that Canada not India won Supermodel in 1996. Wexine.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wexine (talk • contribs) 22:37, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]]

message: I removed the beauty pageant category because I'm not sure this contest really qualifies as a "pageant" in the typical sense.  Agree?  Disagree?   Mbinebri  talk ← 17:00, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beauty pageant? 
Talk:Layering (clothing)

message: This article overlaps severely with article "Layered clothing", which focuses solely on the "practical use" aspect. I suggest the "practical use" content is removed from this article, and a reference is added to "Layered clothing" article. Not much content would then remain in this article, but I don't know the subject matter (fashion) well enough to make suggestions about that.
Skarkkai 19:35, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlap with article "Layered clothing"
Talk:Vector-valued function

message: The article for Inverse function theorem uses this function in an example:
:
F(x,y)=
\begin{bmatrix}
 {e^x \cos y}\\
 {e^x \sin y}\\
\end{bmatrix}
This current article (Vector-valued function) uses this notation:
:\mathbf{r}(t)=f(t)\mathbf{{\hat{i}}}+g(t)\mathbf{{\hat{j}}}
The Inverse function theorem and Jacobian articles seem to be using a kind of shorthand.
If they are accurate, it could be helpful in deciphering the column-vector notation to have something like the following in this current article:
:\mathbf{r}(t)=f(t)\mathbf{{\hat{i}}}+g(t)\mathbf{{\hat{j}}}
=
\begin{bmatrix}
 {f(t)}\\
 {g(t)}\\
\end{bmatrix}
:\mathbf{r}(x,y)=f(x,y)\mathbf{{\hat{i}}}+g(x,y)\mathbf{{\hat{j}}}
=
\begin{bmatrix}
 {f(x,y)}\\
 {g(x,y)}\\
\end{bmatrix}
Ac44ck 17:28, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: \mathbf{r}(x,y)=f(x,y)\mathbf{{\hat{i}}}+g(x,y)\mathbf{{\hat{j}}}
=
\begin{bmatrix}
 \mathbf{{\hat{i}}} ~~ \mathbf{{\hat{j}}}
\end{bmatrix}
*
\begin{bmatrix}
 {f(x,y)}\\
 {g(x,y)}\\
\end{bmatrix}
Ac44ck 19:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternate Representations?

message: The graph shows the curve traced through space by the end of a vector rather than showing a vector.  Interpreting the graph of the given vector-valued function could be helped by showing a vector for some value of 't'.  
Ac44ck 23:33, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Show a vector in the graph?

message: A vector-valued function does not necessarily take only scalar input arguments, as asserted by this article.  This point was in part brought up by a previous comment on this page written in 2007, yet the problem persists. In general, vector valued function have both operands as vectors. Even wikipedia's own article on jacobians mentions this.  See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobian_matrix_and_determinant.  Further, this article states the input operand is a real number.  Such a constraint is of course ridiculous.
:Agreed, I have fixed the first paragraph, so it does not make such a ridiculous claim. However, I am afraid that the article still focuses too heavily on this specific scalar parameter case. Well at least its not claimed to be the only type of Vector valued function to exist anymore.MATThematical (talk) 18:11, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Defination of vector-valued functions incorrect
Talk:Arete

message: The sentence I just slapped the  tag on is ridiculous. It looks like it comes from a management guide or some such crap that engages in massive wishful thinking. David Marjanović (talk) 03:48, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Come on. 

message: The lede uses two orthographies alternately, arete and aretē. Though it does not appear here, arête is another frequent form. It would be best to use a single spelling but list commonly used alternate forms. HGilbert (talk) 10:04, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency of orthography 

message: The correct link for the second note is http://richard-hooker.com/sites/worldcultures/GLOSSARY/ARETE.HTM. I would appreciate it if this section's owner would update it. Many thanks! Rebecca (talk) 20:36, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note #2 

message: I think the use of quotation marks in the first sentence is a bit misleading. The word does not mean "excellence of any kind" in the sense that you could slot that phrase into a sentence in place of "arete". Rather, word means "excellence" and can refer to any kind of excellence. I get that the quotation marks indicate that the entire phrase comes from the cited source, so maybe the fix is to restructure the sentence to something like "Liddle and Scott define arete as..." 12.132.53.98 (talk) 19:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Excellence of any kind" 

message: Here is the link for the Greek language article on arete; I'm not sure how to add this to Languages.  Could someone help? Thank you! https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%91%CF%81%CE%B5%CF%84%CE%AE  TruthSum (talk) 19:46, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a link for the Greek language page (doh!)
Talk:National Cooperative Business Association

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.ncba.coop/ncba/about-ncba. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  BasilSorbie (talk) 14:02, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I noticed a major editing from user:NCBACLUSA, adding , which challenges the principle of verifiability.--Epsilon Tauri (talk) 23:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major editing from {{user|NCBACLUSA}} 
Talk:List of airports in Chile

message: There are several airfields listed here as "airports", even though the DGAC calls those as "aerodromes" (aeródromos). I renamed a couple of these, but someone should identify them in advance to do the job. Diego Grez (talk) 02:17, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Airport" vs. "Aerodrome"
Talk:Kaunos

message: A seemingly increasing number of sources (a few dozen results with an English language Google search) use "Kbid-Kaunos" or "Kaunos-Kbid" to pay due regard for the original Carian language name of the ancient city. That includes Google Books as well and is a higher figure than for some of the article titles we have here. In time we could consider naming this article in the same sense. Cretanforever (talk) 13:39, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Kbid

message: Have found a very trustworthy source about the history of Kaunos by Altan Türe, once archeology student of prof. Bakir Öğün and involved in excavations at Kaunos in 1970. 
A great part of his 2011 book was based on the book by prof. Öğün and prof. Işık, issued at the 25 year anniversary of the Kaunos archeology project.
Have adapted and expanded the Dutch wiki page on the subject, using this information and will do the English one accordingly within 2 days from now. 
I intend to break up the History paragraph into the sections: Hellenic influences; Second Persian era; Roman era; Byzantine era and fall of Kaunos and will use the orginal text under Ancient Times, where convenient.
If time allows, I will add a section on the main remains at and around the site or postpone that till a later date Maria Jonker (talk) 12:30, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion / refinement of this Wiki 

message: I was translating this article for the Portuguese version and found several parts on the introduction copied verbatim from UNESCO World Heritage List. Just bringing this to your attention, because I'm not familiar with the procedure on WP:EN (I mean, I read WP:CP, but I wasn't sure how to post this case manually on the list). Domusaurea (talk) 03:56, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 

message: It's not an "amphitheater", it's just a theatre.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.246.236.194 (talk) 07:38, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not an amphitheatre
Talk:Larry Davis (basketball)

message: Working to expand this article. Lots of information on him. Interesting story. (Doctorfun (talk) 19:36, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 
Talk:Double negative elimination

message: The article states:
The rule of double negative introduction states the converse, that double negatives can be added without changing the meaning of a proposition.
This seems to be wrong. If we have only double negative introduction but not double negative elimination, then adding a double negative weakens the proposition. To me, this seems like changing the meaning.Punainen Nörtti 17:50, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think the proper wording would be "truth value", not "meaning". Otherwise double negative introduction would imply double negative elimination by equating the two propositions. — brighterorange (talk) 18:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I think that's not right either, since (A v ~A) is not provable in intuitionistic ("has no truth value"?) whereas its double negation does. I think there is a more global confusion in the article about whether A = ~~A or whether A ==> ~~A and/or ~~A ==> A as theorems of the logic. The latter seems to be the only sensible way to phrase it if we're going to talk about intuitionistic logic too. — brighterorange (talk) 18:46, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  issue 

message: I think the two articles conflate three distinct concepts—double negation, double negation elimination, and double negation introduction—so I would be in favor of merging Double negation into Double negative elimination and working to fix the confusion.  There is a universally accepted meaning for the term "double negation", as referring to a certain kind of unary operation on propositions (although the precise character of this operation is not universally agreed upon), in the same way that "conjunction" refers to a certain kind of binary operation on propositions.  I take it from the Double negation article that in some historical texts, the "principle of double-negation" refers to an equivalence between a proposition (A) and its double negation (~~A).  However, as discussed in the comments above, because this principle fails in some situations, there is a well-established convention in proof theory of distinguishing double negation elimination from double negation introduction.  (Similarly, "the law of conjunction" is sometimes used to refer to the inference either [from the truth of a conjunction to the truth of the two conjuncts], or [vice versa], while in proof theory this law is more precisely decomposed into "conjunction elimination" and "conjunction introduction".)  I think this is actually explained okay in the Double negative elimination article beginning at the line "Formally, [...]", but I think the material before that is incorrectly using the terminology from proof theory. Noamz (talk) 20:37, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:In Your Pocket City Guides

message: The article sounds like an ad for the guides, written by the publishers themselves.
87.79.35.60 (talk) 09:19, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  sounds like an advertisement 

message: Do they only publish in English? --Error (talk) 18:24, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
File talk:Diagram Needed.svg

message: I think this would be better with a gray image "behind" the text, in the same style as this:
I'm also imagining that we change the image to a simple Venn diagram, which is a sort of common archetypal diagram.  The big plus sign isn't really a diagram.  I think I'll make this later and see what you think. — Omegatron 17:51, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different image
Talk:List of Naruto minor allies

message: how the hell do u guys know the blood type of these people?
I guess from Japan. Yxgtree 23:08, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Official databooks that are released. σмgнgσмg 08:05, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: blood type?

message: I have a question.  i know that the "official date book" says that inari is 8, but in chapter 11 of the manga (page 9 I believe) Tazuna mentions that inari is 10.  I'm sorry if I am mistaken...but doesn't information from the manga sort of trump the date book, seeing as Kishimoto actually wrote the manga?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.218.35.47 (talk) 22:00, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He actually authored both, if I remember correctly. It's an inconsistency worth mention if you feel like it. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 22:02, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Inari
Talk:King Tut (Batman)

message: This article should have, if at all possible, a photograph of the villain as portrayed in the Adam West television series. Lots42 (talk) 15:51, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adam West Series 

message: speacial pprrogreess must be worn  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.235.12.236 (talk) 17:49, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  headline^1coreponds here cause we need to riot in the country
Talk:Kenichi Yamamoto (yakuza)

message: The main source, because there's nothing else in English about this guy on the net, was the Japanese wikipedia.  I was able to translate the first paragraph but the rest has vocabulary beyond me.  If someone would like to translate it, be my guest. Jonmwang 18:03, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life during Yamaken-gumi 

message: Turned heading read right 2600:1011:B14E:C8EE:FA62:4A0C:FA98:9F4F (talk) 16:58, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please uproot
Talk:Software modernization

message: I think the article "Software Migration" might be better suited as a subset of the more general and more vendor-neutral "Software Modernization" section. So, I am proposing a merger of some of the content from "Software Migration" to this page. Any thoughts on the topic would be great.
Pmollins (talk) 18:57, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Software Modernization
Talk:Sir George Harrison

message: "Sir George Harrison" cannot have been the Attorney-General for the Duchy of Cornwall (a.k.a. His Royal Highness's [the Prince of Wales's] Attorney-General) during this period; this office was held by John Chetwynd Talbot 1843–1852 (London Gazette), Sir Edward Smirke 1852–1863 (ODNB, London Gazette), thereafter by Sir William Alexander, 3rd Baronet (London Gazette).
George Harrison (civil servant), knighted 1831, was *auditor* of the Duchy of Cornwall from 1823 until his death in 1841; his "Substance of a Report on the Laws and Jurisdiction of the Stannaries in Cornwall" was published in 1835 and is available in snippet form on Google Books. It is possible that this work may have been drawn on in the legal proceedings which terminated in the passage of the Cornwall Submarine Mines Act, but he was not attorney general at the time. I suggest that the present article be redirected to George Harrison (civil servant) if it can be verified that he was the author of the points there quoted. Choess 00:10, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Inheritance Trilogy Inhabitants

message: Okay, I've done alot of changes to this article, and hopefully taken care of most of the problems that are out there. I have no doubt that there will still be others around, but it's a start at least. But there is still one major problem, that of Alagaësia. Please see the topic at Wikipedia:WikiProject Inheritance Trilogy to discuss what to do with this topic. Thanks! Tuvas 18:15, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alagaësia
Talk:New Jersey Devils Stanley Cup playoffs results

message: I finished it, but it's not complete...still some things to work out. I couldn't find PIM for any of the post seasons, do they not record it for the post-season or is it just hard to find? That's why I put question marks, in case anyone finds them so they can put them in more easily. I left the seasons that they didn't make it in, as well. I feel it's better to leave them there than to take them out. If you took them out, it'd get confusing. This way, you can go easily from one season to the next without having to make sure. If anyone has any other edits they think should be made, feel free. Also, I haven't found if they were the league leader or not for anything during the post-season, yet. I also left the last column so people can see who they lost the games to and by how much. The only name I could think of was "result" even though that doesn't sound very good. Any better ideas for the name of that column? Bsroiaadn 18:24, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I really need to find the PIM for this. Ugh. This is gonna take a lot of caclulating to finish, but hopefully I'll have it finished soon. BsroiaadnTalk 04:42, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Finally
Talk:Mobile Suit Gundam: Gundam vs. Zeta Gundam

message: I transferred the two unsourced sections here. If you can get references for them then place them back--Lenticel (talk) 21:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Section Removal

message: I watched a number of YouTube videos of this game, and I seem to notice that the 0079 Levels are exactly the same in appearance as the levels in Mobile Suit Gundam: Federation vs. Zeon. Is this because they were too lazy to build a newer version of these environments?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.103.233.214 (talk) 21:00, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prequel?