lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sun Remarketing

message: Late parrot status. Websites no longer good. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.34.156.186 (talk) 03:32, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The brand is still "alive" in a fashion, although i would have to agree that the business as it existed is no longer functioning as it was.  As far as justification for deletion, this is "notable" in terms of the history of the internet in Cache Valley (Utah-Idaho).  That is why I have it on my watch list.  --Robert Horning 21:59, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seems dead. 

message: A recent edit tried to locate this business in Logan, Utah.  In fact, the address for the primary business location was in Smithfield, Utah and more or less located in rural Cache Valley.  For those more familiar with the area, the building was located on the west side of highway 91 just north of the Hyde Park Lane street light.  This certainly was not Logan.  Where the company is currently located is unclear, as the website is mainly a blog at the moment with no other contact information listed.  --Robert Horning (talk) 06:01, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your correct and explanations. I have misunderstood because some mass media represented such as "Sun Remarketing in Logan".--HATA A. K. (talk) 11:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem.  It makes sense for people not from Utah to refer to this company being in Logan, just as sometimes a company or person located in or near Los Angeles County in California to claim to be from Los Angeles, California, the city.  It is just how close you slice the issue and how far away those folks are that you are talking to.  While not exactly in the city limits of Logan city, it is in the Logan metropolitan area as defined by the U.S. Census bureau.  But that is a rather broad area.  --Robert Horning (talk) 18:50, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of business 

message: Sun also sold parts and software for Apple ///s well after Apple stopped supporting them. --12.32.87.3 (talk) 22:11, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Apple ///]] 
Talk:SuperPaint (Macintosh)

message: Using the program for years as an alternative to the first Photoshop versions, I believe I can share some technical insight into certain aspects of this program. I'm not too sure what happened to it after Adobe bought Aldus, but I do know that it was either abandoned or drawn from inspirationally for the first versions of Photoshop. IE: the code of SP itself wasn't continued on in any form as "Adobe SuperPaint" (even though it was renamed "Adobe SuperPaint" for it's last version 3.5 iteration for Mac OS Classic (around Mac OS 8.0 or so)), but it certainly aesthetically contributed to the over design of Photoshop (the similarities are there I believe). I can at least provide an icon for the article. :) Let me know if this is ok.--ThePenciler (talk) 17:59, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, just provide reliable sources. Airplaneman  ✈ 01:25, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I hope it's ok if I contribute some stuff. 

message: I'd like to mention how this app introduced the concept of layers, how it was positioned in the market against Canvas, CricketPaint, CricketDraw and Illustrator, and how color was introduced in v3.0 without much fanfare.
The Tidbits article can be used as a reference. Any thoughts?
Connectionfailure (talk) 02:33, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, go for it.  Let's see how you do. :-) - Denimadept (talk) 07:00, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to expand
Talk:Stamping (metalworking)

message: I've been going in a loop, trying to learn about manufacturing things from metal by stamping them.  At this article, there's no information at all, so I click on "forming", which takes me to the article on metalworking.  In the contents, I see "sheet metal forming", which takes me to merely a list.  On that list is "stamping", so I select it -- and I'm back here.
As far as I can tell you've got a set of articles that spend more space listing things that reference back and forth than explaining any of those things!
71.54.200.232 (talk) 07:42, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, you are right, it's not laid out real well right now. Probably the articles you are looking for are punching and shearing (metalworking). Wizard191 (talk) 15:16, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Layout

message: Proposed merger with Stamping press article because of close relationship and both are short articles.Phmoreno (talk) 03:27, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Stamping is a weak article. Way too much on the history of lubrication. I added a Wikilink to progressive stamping, a related technique.  Stamping press doesn't have any sources.  There's a series of articles called "Stamping 101" at , from the Fabricators and Manufacturers Association. Those are good sources for the basics.  Summarizing the "Stamping 101" series would be a good way to improve the article. John Nagle (talk) 18:12, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Added one-line descriptions for each of the stamping operations, with a link to "Stamping 101". John Nagle (talk) 18:35, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Took out most of the long section on the history of synthetic stamping lubricants. Somewhat promotional, and far too specific for this article. Now we need some pictures of stamped objects.  John Nagle (talk) 18:46, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger with [[Stamping press]]
Talk:Kamandi

message: This is awfully close to original research, but I contest the claim that issue 35 confirms in-series that it wasn't a nuclear war. 
There is one soviet voice from the off claiming that I couldn't have been a war because they - presumably the Americans - wouldn't start one. But all the other trappings of the narrative point to nuclear war.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterbruells (talk • contribs) 18:28, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issue #35  - No nuclear war
Talk:Pillar of Shame

message: "The Pillar of Shame is a 8-metre tall bronze, copper or concrete statue, sculpted by Danish artist Jens Galschiot. Currently, five sculptures have been erected in Rome, Hong Kong, Mexico, Brazil and Berlin."
Five sculptures of what...?
: Five different sculptures of the "Pillar of Shame" stands in five different respectively Shrimp wong 09:19, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I rewrote the intro to say that "Pillar of Shame" is the name of each work in a series.  And I removed the confusing tag. RJFJR (talk) 16:43, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening Sentence 

message: :"Immediately following the candlelit vigil on the night of June 4, 1997, [...] at 3 a.m. students succeeded in moving the 2-tonne statue into the podium [...].  The Pillar was re-erected at the same place on April 16, 1997 under bad weather conditions."
How can it be "re-erected" at an earlier date? There seems to be some confusion as to date here. --Sumple (Talk) 08:15, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a web site that says it was re-erected JUNE 16th not April 16th (and that it was moved into the building on the 4th but not assemebled, ther were concerns if the building was strong enough to support it). http://www.aidoh.dk/art_and_events/pos/hongkong/ukposhkchronology.htm (note: if this was in WP we'd need to fix its grammar and spelling.) RJFJR (talk) 16:42, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronological confusion? 

message: I think it's absurd that the Pillar of Shame in Rome has no relationship regarding the deaths and destruction caused by Roman Catholics since the founding of the Church. Even today, the Chruch's stance regarding AIDS, condom uses, etc, is still killing people daily in poor African countries.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.80.236.14 (talk) 04:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Pillar of Shame in Rome? 

message: This article says the Hong Kong  sculpture was destroyed in December of 2021, but the sources seem to me to only say that it was removed on 22 December.  is there a good, clear source that says it was destroyed as well as / after being removed? Kdammers (talk) 18:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Pillar of Shame in Hong Kong
Talk:Nemesis Inferno

message: I went ahead and removed the trivia section and merged the two useful points into the article. Whilst the "Balls of Steel" excerpt was interesting it is (in my opinion) a pure trivia statement and not really belonging in an encyclopedia (plus not cited). If anyone can find an appropriate citation for it and feel that it belongs in the article then please feel free to re-add it. SUB2007 21:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia
Talk:John, Duke of Touraine

message: Changed "betrothed" back to married", unless you have a reason Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 19:24, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Spoil tip

message: This article has translated fairly well but is almost exclusively French in content and relevance. Does anyone have the expertise to expand it with UK, US, German or other material? Ballista 19:27, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article Boney piles is essentially the same thing and appears to be written from a US perspective; I have suggested that the two be merged. Quackdave 18:09, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't the article Spoil bank be merged with this one? It seems to me they are referring to the same thing. Also, Can we not define spoil tip as more generic than only the refuse from coal and ore mining? Doesn't it include waste from any sort of mining, as well as from quarrying? In the "slag heaps" section in Wikimedia commons, images include all of these.Catgirl (talk) 13:20, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Spoil bank to Spoil tip 

message: * corrected the spelling of the transliteration from ukrainian according to the ukrainian wikipedia article
* meaning: "cones of earth"? Some literal translation should be included in article. I'm sure about the "cone" part, but I can only guess about the "terri" part. See also ru:Террикон, uk:Терикон.
--BjKa (talk) 09:26, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  terrykony 

message: * Added citations everywhere they were marked as needed, and corrected statistics that relied on them.
* Added some additional information on the environments of soil tips.
* Consider removing needs citation template?
Crispyman20 (talk) 03:55, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed citations and added information
Talk:Match.com

message: Delete my account 2600:1001:B04F:95E9:8520:7002:E985:4772 (talk) 12:41, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete 

message: IT STATES WE MAY BE EXPENIENCING TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES OR WE MAY BE WORKING TO ENHANCE THIS FEATURE, I CAN NOT OPEN MATCH.COM
THIS IS THE MESSAGE I GET WHEN TRYING TO OPEN SITE 69.130.137.7 (talk) 18:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I AM A PAYING CUSTOMER. FOR 2 TO 3 WEEKS THE IT SAYS WORKING ON SITE IMPROVEMENTS & WILL NOT OPEN UP
Talk:Pentagram (design firm)

message: Should this be deleted? It looks to me like an advertisement.
--TecBrat 19:49, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not a graphic design college major but I have heard of this company. In fact, the one of the company's head designer has an article in Wikipedia and regular contributor to the New York Times regarding design issues. It is easily satisfied the notablitiy criteria of "the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself." Publication: Business Week:   The New York Times:  The article needs to be expanded but the company is definitely notable. --Oskar Mayer Nguyener 19:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This company is not the subject of any of those Business Week or NYT articles though... Mentioning the name a company in passing is not being the subject of an article. The company could well pass Wikipedia's notability criteria but the article needs to document it using reliable sources. Weregerbil 08:53, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Okay, I've fired up LexisNexis -- but I only have access to the last two years.  Here are some of the highlights:  Pentagram was named design firm of the year in 2004 by Ad Age's Creativity; the lede of the story was "In the design world, and frequently well beyond the design world, Pentagram, needless to say, is a known quantity."  When Alan Fletcher (founder of Pentagram) died on September 23, The Independent published a 1,300 obit and the New York Times published a 1,000 word obit.  There are also numerous references in trade publications (dozens in the past two years).  Greyfedora 18:40, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this be deleted? 

message: I think the ratings (presently Start-Class, but ultimately of High Importance) get it about right. The meat of it comes in the early paragraphs, where the distinctive nature of the organization is spelled out. It then descends into lists of personnel and clients, which is what gives the impression of a puff. This early part might be expanded (a new kind of design organization, whose scale was expressly intended to attract corporate clients, but without giving away individual autonomy), along with mention of, say, the series of Pentagram Papers (recently compiled and republished), which was intended to spread the ideas of the firm's partners beyond individual jobs. Also, someone might have a go at summarising the design approach of the practice -- which, given its "clustered" nature, might not be so easy to do. But worth a try! User: Jackhughes  —Preceding undated comment added 08:13, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: — Assignment last updated by Antje Gamble (talk) 16:18, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: History of Modern Design
Talk:Public health informatics

message: __TOC__
Please don't merge this yet.  I think I'm going to try my hand later this week at writing an actual article rather than a stub for this.  The Health Informatics article itself is also very sketchy, so it's really not such a good idea to merge a bunch of topics into it without expanding that because it means they will barely get defined in Wikipedia. Museumfreak 19:51, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

message: See discussion at Talk:Health informatics#Merge public health informatics here? — Donama 05:03, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Health informatics?

message: There were two paragraphs added recently which, although interesting, were actually off-topic.  They dealt with aspects of health care data available to the public on the internet.  Public health informatics is something quite different.  Other than those two paragraphs, there were only one or two sentences in the article, something which I and I am sure other professional public health informaticists feel is quite insufficient.
My initial attempt is pretty much off the top of my head, reflecting my own experience in public health informatics at a state public health department.  It is just a beginning.  But I feel it improves the article 1000%.  Please help expand it! — Pojoman 02:17, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Change to the page 

message: Apparently you had created a Wikipedia page for your new version, but someone deleted it.  I would be very glad to see it and contribute, if it is still an active project.
On the subject of inclusive vs. exclusive: a definition of anything can obviously be harmed by veering too much in one direction or another.  I wrote my version based on what I know of as Public Health Informatics in the work of United States organizations: State Departments of Health (primarily New York State, where I work), the CDC, County Health Departments, and academic PHI programs in Schools of Public Health. I totally ignore international institutions. I don't know much about the few non-profit organizations devoted to PHI.  If there are any other major pockets of Public Health Informatics practice that I haven't mentioned, I am eager to learn about them. — Pojoman 03:22, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any progress on revamp?
Talk:Denmead

message: What is the Denmead Striders?
Denmead Striders is a local walking / running club that is active in the Denmead area. 86.147.173.22 (talk) 10:21, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added the denmeadpedia link as I felt it was relevent to the main Denmead article on the grounds of planning, residential infill of open green space and communicating what has become an issue considered as inevitable within the village. It is similar in nature to the link supplied for the DVA Denmead Village Association which was formed as a "result of the concern of the village inhabitants about uncontrolled urbanisation being forced upon the village during the 1970's." Very much like the DVA I wanted to reinvigorate public interest in the Planning / development of denmead.
I welcome any discussion with the editors concerning my revision. 
Thank you. 
Aconcernedresident (talk) 19:48, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: To be honest, it's inapprpriate for Wikipedia for a number of the reasons given in WP:EL. Nuttah (talk) 21:15, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Addition of Denmeadpedia discussion please.
Talk:Justin (name)

message: * Disambiguation for all links - I am starting this section to discuss what links should be used in the "See also" sections for "Just_n".  I propose the following:
"
* Justan (disambiguation)
* Justen (disambiguation)
* Justin (disambiguation)
* Juston (disambiguation)
* Justyn (disambiguation)
"
Thoughts? --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:03, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: If we're discussing links from disambiguation pages (Justin, etc.) then I agree: for dabs, See also lists terms with similar spelling or pronunciation, even if the meanings are unrelated.  However, that logic does not apply to articles such as Justin (name) to which this talk page relates, where See also lists related topics, even if their names could not be confused with "Justin". Certes (talk) 12:06, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

text: Per WP:NOTSEEALSO, dabs are generally not listed as see also's on non-dab pages; name lists are not dabs per MOS:DABNAME. Link directly to the related name list pages, not the dab, unless the dab happens to have a name list holder.—Bagumba (talk) 02:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  In this case, all of the linked disambiguation pages do contain human names incorporating the linked term. Given the ambiguous pronunciation of this syllable, I would keep these links for all of these pages. BD2412 T 05:42, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What should the "See also" sections of Just_n contain?
Talk:Borg-Warner Trophy

message: I'm deleting this reference - not only is it unsourced and unsupported, it's absurd on its face.
*Although I was not the one who wrote it originally, I think I read that somewhere...I agree it is absurd. The source must have been an uninformed/biased source.
:Well done on identifying yourselves, there. The statement of trophy means one SINGLE one, not new versions given out each year to new teams. The Vince Lombardi Trophy might be universally known in the United States, but there are multiple ones. Ice hockey and the 500-Mile Race have ONE trophy, with replicas, at best, dealt out. Name me another single-example trophy in North America owned by the event-holders themselves, with the renown of the Stanley Cup or Borg-Warner. --Chr.K. 07:27, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second-most recognizable North American sports trophy? 

message: I am quite curious about this facet because on a previous trip to the IMS Museum (early/mid 1990s), I specifically recall seeing that Parsons' name had been corrected (during the fall 1991 restoration). But it could have been a memory lapse. I made an effort to stop by the museum in May of 2006 during race weekend to check the trophy and see Parsons' name on it, but the trophy had been removed from display that afternoon so I couldn't see it. I think it would be very important for someone to track down this once and for all by visiting the museum and taking a photograph for proof purposes. Doctorindy 19:56, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Johnnie Parsons
Talk:Aldershot railway station

message: I suspect that the, er, fascinating section about the ticket machine may need updating... :) DWaterson 20:02, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Crikey, and it has been done! More tickety goodness - congratulations Wikipedians :) DWaterson 21:32, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ticket machine

message: Hello all... 
An image used in the article, specifically :Image:AldershotStation.jpg, has a little bit of a licensing issue.  The image was uploaded back when the rules around image uploading were less restrictive.  It is presumed that the uploader was willing to license the picture under the GFDL license but was not clear in that regard.  As such, the image, while not at risk of deletion, is likely not clearly licensed to allow for free use in any future use of this article.  If anyone has an image that can replace this, or can go take one and upload it, it would be best.
You have your mission, take your camera and start clicking.--Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:14, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image needs replacement
Talk:Abu Hassan

message: Is there an entry for the original story from the Arabian Nights?(208.58.207.32 (talk) 02:12, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Talk:The Brandenburgers in Bohemia

message: Is it "Brandenburgers in Bohemia" or "The Brandenburgers in Bohemia"?  The latter seems more natural to me, and that's the way the lede starts out.  --  JackofOz (talk) 12:23, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections, so I've moved it.  --  JackofOz (talk) 22:32, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Don Quichotte

message: A duplicate navbox has been placed in this article . Can we have an explanation please? Only one navbox is necessary. Is this an infobox manoeuvre by any chance? --Kleinzach 12:41, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The navbox was created in response to a concern by Robert.Allen on project opera. It connects the opera to other work by the composer also, is not "duplicate" but broader in scope and in the right position for a navbox. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:47, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Adding additional info to the existing box would have been the normal thing to do, not duplicating 90% of it. I have now updated the original navbox and deleted the other one. --Kleinzach 13:24, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate navbox  

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Georges Rochegrosse's poster for Jules Massenet's Don Quichotte.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on June 17, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-06-17. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:13, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Georges Rochegrosse's poster for Jules Massenet's Don Quichotte.jpg]]