lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Yelena Davydova

message: I moved here the following excerpt from the article, which, I believe,  should be included into the future article "1981 Gymnastics World Championships":
The USA had a good competition at the 81 Worlds.They were the highhest scoring team on beam optionals. Julianne McNamara finished 7th AA - the highest place all-around finish for an American woman until Brandy Johnson also finished 7th AA at 89 Worlds. The US won 2 medals in event finals,one of their best results in that era and their best result at a World Championships in the 1980's.McNamara finished 5th on beam but would have won silver had she not gone overtime on her exercise.
The Chinese women's team won team silver and 2 medals in event finals.It would be their best result in a World Championship or Olympics until 1995.
Romania had a poor competition.Their main coaches,Bela and Marta Karolyi and their choreographer Geza Pozsar,had defected to the US in April.Romania did reasonably well at the European championships and following that all their training was geared towards the World University Games which were being held in Romania.According to an official of the Romanian gymnastics federation their girls could not peak for a third time that year.
Cmapm 18:26, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: When the image is separated from the template, the article doesn't look good on my display (15 inch) for resolutions, lower, than 1024x768; while if the image is in the template, it looks good in all resolutions, including 640x480. 
I know, 1024x768 is the most popular, but it doesn't seem good IMHO even for that resolution. Can somebody support me or object to my opinion? Cmapm 22:59, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Which is better - image separated from or image in the template?

message: I have read over some of the sources already given and some new sources.I have added additional information from these sources which i have included at the end.I hope this is ok.
Olymfacts (talk) 11:56, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ADDITIONS 
Talk:Orchis

message: This page has a featured article in the de: page (:de:Brandknabenkraut) as well as articles in other editions, but doesn't appear in the list of species here. Does it have another name listed here, or is it missing? Rigadoun 16:20, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the World Checklist of Monocots (Kew gardens)  Orchis ustulata L., Sp. Pl.: 941 (1753) is just a synonym. The accepted name is : Neotinea ustulata (L.) R.M.Bateman, Pridgeon & M.W.Chase, Lindleyana 12: 122 (1997). It is strange that this wasn't checked in the de.wikipedia. This checklist is authoritative.  JoJan 16:51, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Second answer : It was recognized in the de.wikipedia that Neotinea ustulata is the more accepted name. In my opinion, they should have used this name instead the older synonym, even, as they claim, the acceptance of the new name is not complete (but they give no reference for this).  JoJan 16:57, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Another species transferred to Neotinea (N. tridentata) was still listed here. I've now fixed this. Peter coxhead (talk) 21:08, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Orchis ustulata

message: Hi, I need help for identifying wild orchis
File:Orchidée sauvage, Hérault, 122446.jpg
File:Orchidée sauvage, Hérault, 122448.jpg
File:Orchidée sauvage, Hérault, 122623.jpg|Orchis simia
File:Orchidée sauvage, Hérault, 122624.jpg|Orchis simia
File:Orchidée sauvage, Hérault, 123230.jpg|Anacamptis morio
Thanks a lot! Yann (talk) 16:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added my opinion on two species as captions – identifying from photos will always be slightly uncertain, so I'm happy to be corrected. The first two photos puzzle me; they look a bit like a dark form of Orchis purpurea, but the labellum isn't right (compare with :File:Orchis_purpurea_.jpg). Peter coxhead (talk) 20:05, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help for identifying wild orchis
Talk:Kathleen Blanco

message: I added a tag to the article to draw attention to the deficiencies in reference formatting. Anchoress 03:25, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The cleanup tag was removed, but the issue remains, so I'm re-adding it. Anchoress 00:18, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup references tag 
Talk:Learning kanji

message: A year later, this article still strikes me as unencyclopaedic and worthy of deletion rather than keeping.  It's still really nothing but a small collection of links to kanji learning resources.  Anyone want to disagree?  I'll probably list this article for deletion otherwise.  Exploding Boy 06:48, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The only reason this is on my watch list is because I haven't gotten around to AfDing it. I will vote to delete if you post it. Dekimasu 11:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

text: It should probably be transwikied to Wikibooks for the Japanese learning project, but it may just be redundant with what's already there. — Gwalla | Talk 04:56, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete?

message: All right, there was no strong consensus on the recent AfD, although the keep votes were in the minority. But now the title is still wrong, and the page is still a spam magnet, and the content still targets self-learners. How about merging any useful parts of this article to Kyōiku kanji, redirecting this there, and then splitting off the kanji themselves into List of kyōiku kanji? It seems like there would be a net gain of encyclopedic quality in that process. Dekimasu 16:17, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't really see what parts of this article qualifies as useful. The few items that might be worth merging into another article are unsourced (and should therefore be deleted anyways). The whole article simply needs to be deleted. Mordrid52 22:38, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Rewritten, merged, and redirected to Kanji#Kanji education. If the unsourced portions are deleted there, so be it. Dekimasuよ! 05:54, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New idea
Talk:Book of Ether

message: The Book of Ether is also incorporated into the Book of Jared by Elders Samuel Stevens and Warren Parrish. http://www.amazon.com/The-Book-Jared-Dispensation-Everlasting/dp/1490932348/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&qid=1373661965&sr=8-5&keywords=%22The+Book+of+Jared%22  — Prsaucer1958 (talk) 20:58, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: And? -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 19:36, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book of Jared
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Meta

message: There has been a problem on several recent user conduct RfCs that editors have edited portions of the page that they were not supposed to edit.  Sometimes the person whose conduct is the subject of the RfC will insert comments into the Summary, or the certifiers will insert comments into the Response.  I have a suggestion.  The template should have wording added that states that this is not permitted.  I would suggest wording at the top of the Description and the Summary of the form:  "The person whose conduct is the subject of this RfC MUST NOT edit this section.  Editing this section by the subject may result in a temporary block by an admin and may be seen by the ArbCom as evidence of bad faith."  Similarly, the top of the response should have wording of the form:  "The certifiers or endorsers of this RfC MUST NOT edit this section.  Editing this section by the certifiers or endorsers may result in a temporary block by an admin and may be seen by the ArbCom as evidence of bad faith."  Robert McClenon 18:56, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Coloring within the Lines
Talk:St. Catharines station

message: On the table that lists GO train stations before and after St. Catherines, the next stop towards Toronto is listed as Hamilton.
I believe this is in error.  The Hamilton GO station is not on the same line as the CN Grimsby sub to Niagara Falls, and so it is not possible for GO trains operating to St. Catherines to stop at the Hamilton GO centre.  There has been talk of GO reviving some service to the old Hamilton VIA station -- this would allow stops by trains heading from Niagara Falls to Toronto.--Plane nutz (talk) 19:11, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that's correct. In fact, according to GO's timetables, it appears that the weekend Niagara Falls service doesn't even stop at Aldershot, making the next station Burlington. David Arthur (talk) 14:57, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  GO Service to St. Catherines
Template talk:Baháʼí texts sidebar

message: I have reverted the change in the template's look and all the pages it was included in.  The changes made were dramatic and affected the layout of 10s of pages, and thus such a change should be discussed here first.  I for one, don't like the new layout as the thin layout fits best in most of the pages the template is placed in, since they are mostly short.  A better solution would be to make a new template    that has  a new layout, and only include it in pages where its placement makes sense rather than change 10s of pages.  Regards, -- Jeff3000 12:08, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Wholesale changes deserve discussion. MARussellPESE 16:29, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

text: While I see where you are coming from, I still don't like the newly proposed formatting.  Firstly, I don't believe book covers need thumbnails, they are self-describing.  Secondly, if you would like moving the image to the right, it can easily be done by moving the template down below the first subheading.  Replacing a template that is used in multiple pages to fix what-you-believe are aesthetic problems in a subset of of the pages is problematic, because it ruins the placement of the template in the other pages.  Thirdly what you see as mushed and unaesthetic, is very subjective, just as I don't see it as so, and thus I stand by my first comment on this page, that such a large change affect 10s of articles needs to be discussed first.  Regards, -- Jeff3000 00:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've placed your version of the template (with a slight colour change) at .  Now the articles that are quite short, can be switched to the new template, without messing up the other pages which work well with the vertical template.  Regards, -- Jeff3000 01:30, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Most of the religious templates used are the tall skinny variety, (Islam, Christianity, Sikhism, Buddhism, etc) and the most prominent location of this template is on the non-stub pages, and changing the look of the template to deal with the stub pages is not logical in my opinion. -- Jeff3000 13:57, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

text: For most of the pages it can be done by moving the template down, and for those that it can't (a small minority) the better idea is to create a new template (which is what I've done) and place it on that small subset of pages instead of modifying the current one and then changing all other pages (both non-stub pages that have a picture in the left, and the more prominent pages that have the template much lower on the page) to match the new pattern.  Regards, -- Jeff3000 04:34, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverts 

message: As the Nine Pointed Star is (according to Shoghi Effendi) not the symbol of the religion, would it be more prudent to replace it with a more accurate symbol? Peter Deer (talk) 14:25, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's the most recognizable symbol, and other symbols can be confusing.  If the House chooses to use the nine-pointed star in much of its material, it's the symbol that should be here.  Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 14:43, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nine Pointed Star
Talk:List of Naruto OVAs

message: Comments like "worth your money" do not belong in an encyclopedia article.  Somebody needs to clean up this article.
I fixed up the 2nd one, since apparently the person who wrote it has never taken a grammar class. Also i have not seen the OVA so i could only correct the grammar errors and take out material that is not appropriate (like the above mentioned 'worth your money' statement and the play-by-play commentary about the fight scene). This stuff just doesnt belong here and is leaning towards fancruft, but not without good intention though. If someone has watched this OVA and could elaborate or write a good NPOV section it would be greatly appreciated. Tik 18:15, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too Opinionated 

message: Navigating through the individual articles to each OVA, I found that they were all tagged as "articles needing context".  Since it is very likely that someone who is interested in one of the OVA's will eventually navigate to the summaries for the other OVA's, and because this page was painfully short and missing summaries, and in the interest of adding a context to those tagged pages, the following source articles have been fully merged into this article, namely, Naruto (OVA):
*Find the Crimson Four-Leaf Clover
*Battle at Hidden Falls. I am the Hero!
*Finally a clash! Jōnin VS Genin!! Indiscriminate grand melee tournament meeting!!
While it might not be the best solution possible, it is certainly an improvement over the ugly, tagged pages before. Byakuren 17:21, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged Pages 

message: Just a quick note to explain the revert and avoid an edit fracas:
:- "Jounin" was changed back to "Jōnin", for spelling consistency, as per "Naruto ninja ranks" and the rest of the Naruto category.
:- "Godaime" is the correct Japanese word for "Fifth", at least according to every source I've found.  Then again, I'm not Japanese, so if this is incorrect, plese update.
Keep the contributions coming! -- Byakuren 19:54, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert on Jul. 11, 2006 

message: Has been dubbed [check it out here]--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 04:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naruto the Movie OVA: Konoha Annual Sports Festival 

message: also add when the episodes took place, which episode it aired after. Uzumaki Dude (talk) 02:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  when?
Talk:Anjou (borough)

message: *  Anjou (borough)  → Anjou Borough Council
*Similarly:
** Lachine (borough) → Lachine Borough Council
** LaSalle (borough) → LaSalle Borough Council
** Montreal North (borough) → Montreal North Borough Council
** Outremont (borough) → Outremont Borough Council
** Saint-Laurent (borough) → Saint-Laurent Borough Council
** Saint Leonard (borough) → Saint Leonard Borough Council
** Verdun (borough) → Verdun Borough Council
* Bad enough we even have articles about borough administrations (something I think could easily be covered in the borough articles), but these are horribly misnamed. I'm not entirely sure how to procede here, since these articles each contain the history of the main borough article before it was split. Farquard 19:58, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
* OPPOSE article contens have little to do with the bourrough councils. 67.68.65.49 03:47, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

text: Add any additional comments
* The articles pertain to the burroughs not the burrough councils. Rather, the articles should be merged with the bourough articles, as they contain not much content, and what there is is more or less general bourough information. 67.68.65.49 03:47, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add any additional comments
* The articles pertain to the burroughs not the burrough councils. Rather, the articles should be merged with the bourough articles, as they contain not much content, and what there is is more or less general bourough information. 67.68.65.49 03:47, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Template talk:Infobox software2

message: It might look better to right align the first column and left align the second column. e.g.:
Maintainer:     	John Smith
Stable release: 	1.0 (January 1, 2005)
Preview release:	2.0 (February 1, 2005)
OS:             	Unix
Genre:          	Example
License:        	GPL
Website:        	www.foo.bar
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Heptite (talk • contribs) 08:08, 25 October 2005.
:Looks good. -- Centrx 23:39, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested style change 

message: I don't know if it's a bug or my misuse of template but, it seems, that if article title contains special characters then this template doesn't work properly. Try for example clicking on version number in article Monotone (software). Vvs9 06:19, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed for the Monotone specific page . Coeur 01:38, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problematic articles 

message: Should I write something like this:
{{LPR|
 article = BearShare
|latest_release_version = n/a
|latest_release_date = -
}}<noinclude>
* Back to article "[[BearShare]]"
</noinclude>
or shall I leave the page blank like this::
<!--{{LPR|
 article = BearShare
|latest_release_version = 
|latest_release_date = 
}}--><noinclude>
* Back to article "[[BearShare]]"
</noinclude>
--Patrick Maitland 12:46, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What to write into the LPR template when there's no preview release? 

message: When Infobox_software2 article was created, the |platform= param was left out.  Please add it back.  --Lexein 06:01, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Please add missing field

message: I haven't gone all through the template but I've noticed that on the articles GNU Octave and LimeWire this template doesn't function as I have expected. On the GNU Octave article the links for stable and preview release both lead to the preview release: , and on the LimeWire article lead to the stable release: . Is this the problem with the articles or this template's syntax or something else? All the best. --Biblbroks's talk 18:47, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible problem with syntax

message: Why is there a "Genre" section? It links to "software category". The Genre article says:
  A genre...is a loose set of criteria for a category of composition; the term is often used to categorize literature and speech, but is also used for any other form of art or utterance.
I don't think software counts as a form of art or of composition. What's everyone else's opinion? 194.81.36.9 (talk) 10:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre vs Type/Category
Talk:Colargol

message: The French, English, and Norwegian language versions of this film have not been re-released, and as I understand are subject to a French lawsuit between Procidis and the performers of the original audio recordings.
Ah, Sherlock Holmes, how clever is it to find planted "clues"? 80.225.4.192 17:43, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:B chromosome

message: User Turnstep has objected to the addition of this page (see Talk:Genome).  It was added as a stub because the chromosome page did not (and probably should not) include anything about supernumerary chromosome fragments.  I did not add much detail, but have provided several of the most recent reviews in references.  If someone could fill out this page more that would be quite helpful.70.31.67.60 20:18, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: this entry really reads like someone's lecture notes. I am preparing a presentation on B Chromosomes soon. Maybe I will feel proficient enough to edit this so it is more wikified soon. --Frenkmelk 04:03, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup needed. 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jellyfish829 (talk) 11:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Molecular Genetics
Talk:Ansible

message: This book, by Joe M. McDermott, uses the term ansible frequently. One example: "A new tech was ordered from the network ansibles; a new recruit from Earth would be called to this miserable station."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Infimprob (talk • contribs) 00:04, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Fortress at the End of Time 

message: Now that entanglement is an accepted component of quantum mechanics {https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement} and it has been done in a controlled environment {https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.07459.pdf} the development of Ansible communication is only a mater of coherence time, id like the page to be in line with this reality and not have it called "a category of fictional device" But I see the page has been updated within the last three days so in case someone else want the honers. If the above comment is any indication this change has been needing to happen sense 2008 so your over a decade late anyway. I would be very disappointed if there is some agenda being pushed here. Wikipedia is used in schools you know...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.113.179.182 (talk) 03:18, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not know enough about it myself to explain why, but the consensus of mainstream physicists is that faster-than-light communication cannot be accomplished via quantum entanglement, even though entanglement does involve "nonlocal" correlations that seem like they cannot be explained in any other way.  See the no-communication theorem article. Elwoz (talk) 20:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: absolutely not "a category of fictional device"

message: ; ref 1
Having contacted the author of ref 1 he maintains {publicly, see his twitter} the description as outlined in ref 1 is accurate to the work of Le Guin, being most clearly illustrated in the Dispossessed
; ref 3
Clearly holds information can be communicated between entangled particles 
; ref 4
Is deep, It not only shows how you can have entangled networks, it should be enough that most students could create their own entanglement based communication.
; refs don't mean that!
ref 1 the form the tech must take to be called Ansible by Le Guins standards. Ref 3 we can communicate as described. ref 4 you can see for yourself.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.113.179.182 (talk) 20:54, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Notwithstanding the cited references, the content (now reverted) that was added to the lead constitutes original research and synthesis. When a Wikipedia editor personally contacts the author of a reference, and relies on that contact, that clearly violates Wikipedia's policy on WP:OR. The rest of the statements above do not establish compliance with Wikipedia policy; they are an individual editor's own analysis of the sources, which is personal opinion. A statement that "most students could create their own entanglement based communication" doesn't help establish credibility. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 22:42, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  References for "theoretical" non-fictional ansibles
Talk:Semi-presidential republic

message: There should be consensus regarding the inclusion of countries with limited recognition. It would be better to include only countries which are recognised by at least one UN member state. Please share your thoughts and ideas in this regard. The Sri Lanka (talk) 14:43, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Countries with limited recognition 

message: Llamada  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2806:102E:18:7CB8:20A9:DC70:BE2:FB22 (talk) 11:00, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confijurasion 

message: The article is unclear as to whether it intends to include elected presidents whose role is predominately ceremonial or administrative acting on the advice of the government though possibly with some rarely-used reserve powers.  Looking at the lists (e.g. Ireland), it does not - instead calling such countries parliamentary republics.  But the text seems to suggest that perhaps it should. Personally, I think the text should be changed. 193.240.203.36 (talk) 13:10, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ceremonial elected presidents