lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Estonian Land Forces

message: * Bad English.
* Inline external links. These need to go to "External links" section.
* Wikilinks used as external links, quite often circularly - ie. linked Maavägi as Estonian Army
* The status of photos is questionable, I don't think they are self-made/PD
* Small images in front of the headlines need to go
* Too many images overall, not needed, can be put into Commons. Looks like children's encyclopedia right now.
* No inline references
* Too many single-sentence sections. These (ie. such as Ceremonial sword, Ceremonial rifle etc) would be better presented as a wikitable.
-- Sander Säde 08:48, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article issues

message: * Bad english - few grammar mistakes doesnt mean that its completely wrong and crap..? Its still under construction..95% of the text have been copied and pasted from the Estonian defence Forces official webpage - bad english is little bit too roughly said to valuate the page :S
* Small images in front of the headlines need to go - No other military of.. has such thing. I think it should-could be a standard - make it more interesting and its also unique here..The small icons is one of the reasons I began to make this page overall - so it would differ and be special.. 
* Images belong to the armed forces of Estonia but I ahve edited them -t herefore the images are not the same, they ahe been cut and resized more than 50% of their original size.
* Too many images overall, not needed, can be put into Commons. Images illustarte the arm types - cathces the eye when a visitor is watching the page.. 
* No inline references - working on it..
* Too many single-sentence sections. These (ie. such as Ceremonial sword, Ceremonial rifle etc) would be better presented as a wikitable - explaining the the type of arm or status, very simple and easy to understand for the wathcer..
-- User:Karabinier 15:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Copyright, copyright, copyright :S. I appreciate the expansion of the web page, but when you say you have copied 95% of the text then a warning light starts flashing, also cropping images doesn't give the  cropper copyright over the image. I don't know what the Estonian copyright law states so I leave it for now. --MoRsE (talk) 14:55, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Article issues 

message: "Estonian sniper with the main sniper rifle Sako TRG-42"
The rifle in the picture is clearly not a TRG-42. It appears to be an M14 (or some variation there of).
The picture either needs to be removed or recaptioned. As I am somewhat new to this stuff, I would appreciate advice on which to do. (It is a nice picture, though) Rmnguy 01:47, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sniper picture and caption 

message: Those things have obviously no place being there. Do they belong to EDF? Nope. Get rid of them. This is not an article about NATO military equipment stationed in Estonia. Ain't got the time right now to get into this wiki editing thing, lest I break it.80.235.84.91 (talk) 13:08, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fighter jets and Abrams tanks on equipment page
Talk:Thanks and Giving

message: As a representative of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, I am updating information about the Thanks and Giving campaign to reflect changes from the previous year’s program. These updates are made strictly on a factual basis to ensure correct information about the program is in the public realm. ThanksandGiving webmaster 17:53, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am requesting some edits to the overview of this page to better categorize the Thanks and Giving program. As it currently reads, the program is called the national fund-raising program of St. Jude. This is not the only national fundraising program St. Jude has. Further I'd like to give additional clarity on how donations are gathered and the amount raised by the program to date. Thanks for assistance and any feedback. I have posted the proposed edits here: [] Joe at St. Jude (talk) 22:44, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The link you provided appears to be broken? Best to just include the suggested changes here on the Talk page. CorporateM (Talk) 22:49, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like this is the intended link: User:Joe at St. Jude/sandbox. I see a couple problems here though: the proposed text sounds OK (a little promotional but easily fixed) but doesn't include any supporting references, and this article should probably be merged into St. Jude Children's Research Hospital instead of being maintained as it is. The part of this article covering the Thanks and Giving program is somewhat short (two paragraphs), and the rest of the article is about the hospital and a list of corporate partners (which should probably be cut down). I'd like to propose redirecting this article to St. Jude Children's Research Hospital and integrating this information into the "Funding" section of that article, which already includes some details about the Thanks and Giving program. Joe at St. Jude, can you provide reliable sources to help support your proposed text? I tried doing a quick search for references but only found press releases. Dreamyshade (talk) 08:39, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Overview edit request
Talk:ANSI/ISA-95

message: The graphic is missing. The source is no longer there
--Pareshbh (talk) 21:25, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Pareshbh, I will remove the link now as the original author has not for more than 6 months. Colin Wheeler (talk) 08:13, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Kensuke Shiina

message: The article was created in response to the community portal - 'Articles requested more than a year ago' (paraphased). Kensuke Shiina's  name was there and the request was for a stub to be written which other Wikipedians could then add to. 
I duly wrote the stub - and although I am no expert on Kensuke Shiina - he is one of the first Japanese DJ/Muscian exponents of trip hop (Bristol scene), lounge and Shibuya kei music  - and sits with Towa Tei, Fantastic Plastic Machine, Yoshinori Sunahara, and others in moving this music forward and bringing it to the popularity it has today in Japan.
Yes the stub needs to be expanded as the referencable information comes in - but an article on Kensuke Shiina is as important as an article on most of the English speaking muscians here. In due course I have no doubt that it will be expanded - and it will be an important refernce source for the followers of electronica, shibuya-kei, lounge etc. Wikipedia is not only a reference source for the obvious musical stars of the day - but also for the more obscure who owrk in less popular genres - and by representing this Wikipedia can claim to have expanded encyclopedic knowledge.
In a recent interview on CNN Jimmy Wales, the founder of Wikipedia, said he would like Wikipedia to one day be the sum of all human knowledge. This is one step towards that...
...and come on guys - Wikipedia requested the article, I wrote a stub just yesterday, give it some time to grow.... Kunchan 21:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the tag, as this person has released three albums on the same label. That's enough of an assertion of notability for me to feel like speedy deletion is inappropriate here. Some refs would be awesome, though. Natalie 22:53, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for non-deletion
Talk:Manorama Six Feet Under

message: In three regards the end of the plot summary does not match up to the English-dubbed version that I watched on YouTube. First, we do not see the wife commit suicide the next day. That would require a flash forward which isn't on this version. Second, the character does not state that God is certain or known but says you will get an answer if you address him. Finally the voice over ends there but the movie continues and shows the 3 family members reunited in the rain. I do not want to edit the plot summary because I do not know if the three points I raised are different in the original Hindi version.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:646:C200:74B4:78E8:F3A7:3550:1BC3 (talk) 23:56, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The plot summary does not match up with the English dubbed version
Talk:Bahía Honda, Cuba

message: It is fairly easy to convince oneself that the boundaries specified in the 1903 lease are the same as the current boundaries. The lease also required that the land be fenced, so that an increase in size of the leased area would require new fencing. What is the name of the lease in 1912 that the text refers to? The Hay-Quesada treaty refers to the isle of Pines, not Bahia Honda. ( Martin |  talk • contribs  05:16, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bahia Honda abandoned for more land at Guantanamo?
Talk:List of BR 'Britannia' Class locomotives

message: In my opinion, the names of the locomotives should probably not link to their namesakes, unless that is the generally idea.  I would assume that the locomotives themselves are of some note, at least some of them.  --Cromwellt|talk|contribs 18:14, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, this article points largely at unrelated articles and disambiguation pages. This misleads the reader and discourages article creation. - Dravecky (talk) 21:45, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

text: Agreed. This still needs attention. To clarify what Cromwellt is saying, for example locomotive 70000 Britannia should not link to Britannia, but to BR standard class 7 70000 Britannia. I'm willing to make a start, but I doubt I have sufficient time to fix them all.--Rfsmit (talk) 21:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Very few loco names are entirely original: most were named after someone, somewhere or something. It's normal practice on lists of locomotives to link the numbers to articles on the specific locomotive, and the names to whatever the loco was named after. Therefore, the link 70000 should be added, and Britannia should be left alone. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:10, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Linking
Talk:Ophiognomonia clavigignenti-juglandacearum

message: not moved. Worth waiting a bit for the paper to be published and for the reclassification to be generally accepted. --rgpk (comment) 17:02, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Money dance

message: I found this article, pretty near word-for-word, here: http://www.hudsonvalleyweddings.com/guide/$dance.htm
Who's plagiarizing who??
Info for the US was not correct. Some do the dance based on immigrant traditions, but as a general point of etiquette, doing the money dance or in any way demanding money from guests is considered rude. I do also find the mention of "face time" odd, as if the couple is somehow not circulating among guests unless propositioned with money.64.50.201.98 (talk) 16:13, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Template talk:Future UK TOCs

message: I think that the prospective/current/future templates should be put next to each other in the same way that we had the Current and Upcoming together.
This will allow Wiki users to navigate from any TOC past, present or future to any other with just one click.
This is a "sort of" merger, but there would be three boxes in the one template. 
What do others think? Too complicated? Unnecessary? Too big? Dewarw 16:52, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template Merger 

message: I have made quite some changes to the templates (one leads to another etc!). Are they ok? Dewarw (talk) 00:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes 

message: From Monday, the only "confirmed" TOC will start. That will leave the template with three pipe-dreams. Obviously, they should remain on it, but perhaps the template should be altered in some way.
Any ideas/comments? Btline (talk) 19:00, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We should stick with one name as there are going to be future companies but the name should not keep changing between "Future" and "prospective" and back, when and when there is not a future TOC\company\franchise. Simply south (talk) 19:25, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What shall we do? 

message: Should we remove operators such as First Harrogate Trains as these are essentially dead in the water? I'd propose that any open access which doesn't get the go-ahaed should not be considered 'future'. --Pretty Green (talk) 10:55, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In the absence of any further information suggest First are still working on this proposal then it should be removed. I wouldn't agree that a failed ORR application should result in the removal though because in some instances development of the proposal could still continue very actively. In the case of FHT's though, the website seems to have died and the status of the company is listed at Companies House as being "Active - Proposal to Strike off". Whilst I'm not familiar with what all these terms mean, it could suggest the owners are planning to dissolve the company. Unless anyone can find any up to date information to say First are still pursuing this then I'd agree to its removal from this template. Adambro (talk) 12:39, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

text: Along similar lines, I'll also remove Platinum Trains. --Pretty Green (talk) 13:27, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Denied Operators

message: Template:Future UK TOCs has been nominated for merging with Template:Current UK TOCs. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Cnbrb (talk) 19:27, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination for merging of [[Template:Future UK TOCs]]
Talk:Tony Olsson

message: Tony Olsson was an international motorcycle speedway rider who represented his country Sweden speedway team in the Speedway World Team Cup Final on at least two occasions. He is highly notable. Was the deleted article about the same person ? I fail to understand the reasomn for this nomination. Hammer1980·talk 18:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You may note that this article has expanded significantly since I put it up for deletion. First of all, I do not recall what the old Tony Olsson article was about, but the article (as it was) didn't do much to assert notability. I'm still a bit concerned - how does a series of what appear to be the same thing (speedway racing almanacs) establish notability? How does his own team's website establish notability? We need two reliable third party sources demonstrating that this person is actually notable. See the policy in question. I still see nothing that makes this article meet notability requirements. --Cheeser1 01:27, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Talk:Brighton and Hove built-up area

message: This section includes a list which is referred to in the previous section. I'm not sure how it should be moved around (which is why I didn't take a stab yet) but I believe there's some need to correct the last sentence of the introduction or move it into the Places in the conurbation section. Thoughts? Gavinayling (talk) 20:23, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Places in the conurbation

message: Where did the "Map of the Brighton and Hove Built-up Area with labelled subdivisions" come from? The way it divides the conurbation up is a bit odd:
* Portslade is shown as separate from "Brighton and Hove", although it is part of the City of Brighton and Hove
* Lancing is shown as part of Shoreham, I'm not sure with what justification
Is there a better one we could use?
--HairyDan (talk) 15:52, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I created using the data in the article's source. There are KML map files, you can open them in Google Earth or QGIS. Honestly all the built-up area subdivisions have slightly weird boundaries. Eopsid (talk) 19:16, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

text: Portslade is seperated from Brighton and Hove in the list of subdivisions as well in the map in this article. There isnt any justification given in the source for how they subdivide the built-up area. In my opinion the subdivisions are arbitrary. There is a good justification for the built-up areas and how they create them though. The methodology is mentioned at the top of: List of urban areas in the United Kingdom Eopsid (talk) 19:20, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:Flora of the United States

message: Why are there provinces listed that aren't in the United States? Like the Canadian Province, or the Arctic Province.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.104.94.236 (talk) 04:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: perchè sei sicuro che te ne devi andare a cagare? 93.66.84.217 (talk) 15:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-American Provinces?

message: I have tagged this comment in the lead requesting a citation, though much of the article is also lacking information. Reasoning for the challenge is that Flora of Australia has 20,000+ vascular species and an estimated 250,000 Cryptogam species. Gnangarra 03:51, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What is wrong? one of the most diverse temperate floras in the world. The Australian flora is not temperate, it is mostly tropical. Colchicum (talk) 09:37, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Australian Flora isnt mostly tropical, if one was to exclude the tropical species the figure would be closer to 17,000. This doesnt mean that US flora isnt comparable to Chinas flora...exclusively/only comparable is a big statement. What I'm asking for is a citation attributing the comment or was it a Synthesis of published material by the article editors.  Gnangarra 14:32, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comparatable only to China
Talk:Albourne

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 03:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aldingbourne

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 03:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish (Aldingbourne) should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.
Therefore, I suggest villages within the parish (Westergate) to be merged and redirected to Aldingbourne. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 01:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged ++ MortimerCat (talk) 13:54, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Proposal 
Talk:Aldwick

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 03:11, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish (Aldwick) should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.
Therefore, I suggest villages within the parish (Rose Green) to be merged and redirected to Aldwick. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 23:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged ++ MortimerCat (talk) 13:54, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 
Talk:Amberley, West Sussex

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 03:11, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ardingly

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 03:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Ardingly is an old siding and CBH recieval site in Western Australia. It is situated on the Geraldton-Wongan Rail Line about 10ks south west of Mullewa.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.135.147.88 (talk) 07:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ardingly in WA 
Talk:Ashington, West Sussex

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 03:14, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

message: I reverted the last edit because transport links are useful information about a village, not an advertisement.--Doug (talk) 11:28, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Transport Links
Talk:Todd Gallagher

message: The original article says this:
The Washington Post has pointed out similarities to the ABC show Shaq Vs.  and Gallagher's book saying the book and the show have "precisely the same premise" and are that a TV show based on the book Gallagher was trying to sell was "the exact same show."[26] http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dcsportsbog/2009/07/shaq_denied_entrance_by_the_wh.html  Gallagher appeared as a producer in both seasons of the show.
This is accurate but it was not a controversy. It was just a parenthetical statement in a Washington Post article that wasn't about Gallagher or his book. It might have justifiably upset Gallagher but I don't think it belongs in his Wikipedia bio. (Ganacka (talk) 19:39, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shaq Vs. Controversy 

message: I have removed "social scientist" from the list of occupations describing Gallagher. A social scientist is an academic who conducts scientific studies. I can't find any evidence that this is an accurate representation of Todd Gallagher who is a journalist. Ganacka (talk) 00:07, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social scientist categorization
Talk:Ashurst, West Sussex

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 03:15, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

message: Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.
Therefore, I suggest that villages within the parish with a one or two sentence article, ie Bines Green to be merged and redirected to this parish article. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 14:24, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Any history or photos on Ashurst Hall? Bankhallbretherton (talk) 20:39, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ashurst Hall
Talk:Balcombe

message: Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.
Therefore, I suggest that villages within the parish with a one or two sentence article, ie Balcombe Lane  to be merged and redirected to this parish article. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 12:42, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Wikipedia is not "the news," but we do include a brief summary of information published in generally reliable sources. User:Fred Bauder Talk 11:26, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:Recentism the rule of thumb is that we only include what is likely to seem significant in ten years from now. I suspect that by then the village will not have been levelled by earthquakes, nobody will have been incinerated by natural gas coming out of water taps and the wells will either have failed to produce or will be quietly working day to day as those at Storrington and Singleton do now. The residents may well have moved on to protesting about a proposed wind turbine or solar array. Per due weight these protests will be mentioned but there is no need per WP:NOTNEWS for daily updates.--Charles (talk) 13:46, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It is partly a matter of editorial judgment, see Wikipedia:Notability (events). For the same reason the Guardian is covering the protests closely we should give them some weight; remember fracking is banned in France, just a few miles away. User:Fred Bauder Talk 14:22, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Battle of Balcombe