lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Wild Hogs

message: I'd like to incorporate this news article here, but I'm not sure how. Prometheus-X303- 12:00, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wild Hogs used to promote motorcyle safety 

message: Isn't the film complete? Prometheus-X303- 15:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finished 

message: "It will be released nationwide on March 2nd."
Sorry to be pedantic, but which nation is being refered here? 
Thalasstkynn 03:34, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationwide? 

message: I found this to be written poorly almost like a movie review rather than an article.  It also may be leaning more one way than the other.  Can someone help me clean it up?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.215.248.109 (talk) 08:42, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written strangely 

message: Ok, now when there are legible sources such as Rotten Tomatoes an even interviews with the cast about the sequel.....WHY WOULD SOMEONE TAKE IT OFF THE PAGE??????Onepiece226 (talk) 23:52, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  The WH sequel has been finshed and was shot at Surgis in 2010.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.165.85.16 (talk) 23:19, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sequel
Talk:Sound on Sound

message: Can this article please have 'stub' status removed?  Thanks in advance.  SOSJennifer (talk) 15:23, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates 

message: There also was a late-60s garage band from Tidewater, Virginia by that name. Their 1968 song Girl, you've got to turn me on (released on the obscure Tunnel Records label, obviously not identical to modern-day Tunnel Records from Germany, sound quality and most of the verses are pretty crap, but the swirling chorus had definite hit potential) is on rotation on the 60s garage, psychedelia, and British Invasion station Beyond the Beat Generation . Discogs entry for the single: . According to Allmusics.com, it seems to have been released on a 2001 sampler called Aliens, Psychos & Wild Things Vol. 2. And here's an article on the band on Garage Hangover:  --2003:56:6D1B:C614:D829:8DF2:A704:6AC (talk) 20:10, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the current title of the band article? The only other similar article I could find is Sound on Sound (album). Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:55, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no such article for the late-60s band so far. Just saying that there's some work to be done here. Many disambig pages have lots of skelletal information for things that don't have their own articles yet. --2003:56:6D1B:C627:9934:1162:2DE9:AF41 (talk) 15:36, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambig for band
Talk:Wipe (transition)

message: This article assumes that you already know what a wipe is. It needs to start with a short explanation.
Macboff (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a definition of wipe 

message: I added  on the article. On the future disambig page, this page should also link to file wiping, among other meanings of 'wipe'. -- intgr 10:41, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Disambig created at Wipe. ~MDD4696 04:15, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed split 

message: Added a point about what i would call an "invisible wipe", If you ask me, the most common of all wipe effects. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.240.104.246 (talk • contribs) 01:15, 21 November 2006  (UTC)
:Not certain if it's the most common, but definitely a good point that was overlooked. Well done! Girolamo Savonarola 05:14, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invisible wipe
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/F.O.E.

message: I stated my view in pretty brief language, but there really didn't seem much more to say on the subject. user:F.O.E. has not edited since the day this RfC was started, so I assume he understands its gravity (and he's certainly aware of it, as he commented on this page (see above)). SB Johnny 17:04, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree, he commented before Moe Epsilon actually finished writing the RfC, so unless he refreshed the page later, he has not seen the evidence of those making claims against him.  Of course, refusal to look is not exculpatory.  Kasreyn 19:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional comments (and efforts) 

message: He still hasn't responded to the RfC and it's been up almost a month. I'd almost suggest moving this up to RfAr. Torinir ( Ding my phone My support calls E-Support Options ) 18:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not convinced. I say wait a week or two, and if he still hasn't shown up someone should send him an email. JoshuaZ 03:24, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If he doesn't start responding, I will make an RFAr. 216.78.95.189 - Moe Epsilon 00:09, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's F.O.E.?
Talk:Akazome Emon

message: ← discussion moved here from User talk:Kaustuv.
Well, I wasn't adding the redlinks tag for you, I was adding it for everybody. I don't feel strongly about it. Anyway, in the section of Akazome Emon where you've written "classical kana orthography," I'm a bit confused. I was under the impression that there was no dakuten in classical orthography. Am I wrong? Dekimasu 07:35, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: is one of the ugliest box templates ever created. It has no encyclopedic value, is useless to the reader, and is borderline insulting to the editors. It ought to be placed on the talk page if anything. I don't know if you've noticed, but the English WP's coverage of classical Japan is next to horrible; I'm trying to solve the issue one major work at a time (currently working on the Ogura Hyakunin Isshu; see), with the intention that any red links created will be filled up in a second pass. On the topic of dakuten, I am not sure if the original manuscripts contained them, but modern transliterations certainly do use them freely. See  for the specific waka cited in the Akazome Emon article, for example. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 17:04, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redlinks and Classical Japanese Orthography
Talk:Logical abacus

message: It's hard to tell from this article what it's about.  I suspect
it refers to the logical abacus built by W. Stanley Jevons, also
called a logical piano.  But the article has links to pictures of
ordinary abacuses, which are quite a different thing. There is
also a hypothetical machine called an abacus machine which was introduced by Lambek for discussions of computer science. The linked pictures of abacuses are also irrelevant to Lambek's abacus machines.
This article needs to be made more lucid.  I'm not qualified to do
this myself, so I hope some expert will come by to clean it up.
OinkOink 23:34, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

message: This article needs to mention something about whether an Abacus can simulate a Turing machine. MrVoluntarist 15:27, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turing machine? 

message: I will nominate this article for deletion unless it is improved and shown to be significantly different from abacus--Cronholm144 00:14, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD

message: This will solve both the problems with the quality of the article and the fact that someone apparently confused Jevon's logical abacus (which involved moving around pieces of wood by hand) with the machine he had built based on the same principles (the "logic piano"). Daggerstab (talk) 19:56, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into [[Logical machine]]
Talk:Polarized 3D system

message: The article says: The QWP always transforms circularly polarized light into linearly polarized light.   As QWP are wavelength sensitive, and a wide range of wavelengths are used for human vision, I wouldn't say always.  I am not sure how the systems solve this. Gah4 (talk) 07:22, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  always?
Talk:3D lookup table

message: Although I admit it is of interest to users, since color management for film is nascent, I propose to altogether remove the list of manufacturers. We don't have a list of computer manufacturers in computer or car manufacturers in automobile. It would be much better if we could point people to a Web site devoted to color management in film that had a list of manufacturers. --Adoniscik(t, c) 17:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of manufacturers 

message: The table given as an example is not a 3D LUT for interpolation, but instead a 1D LUT with complete entries requiring no interpolation.  Hoping for an example that actually illustrates the concept of the entry. 
BrassRatt (talk) 19:45, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table Example
File talk:Europe germanic-languages.PNG

message: What does the red line do east of Danzig? It seems to indicate that Swedish was never spoken on the islands of Estonia and in the Gulf of Riga, which is historically untrue. It would be just as bad to draw the red line along river Daugava, so I suggest that the part east of Danzig is just removed. --LA2 10:43, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I find the positioning of the red line regarding the Frisians very odd. The Frisian language is naturally West Germanic (not North Germanic) but it is spoken in Nordfriesland south west of the Danish-German border but this map moves this area north of the border into Denmark. I have never heard about any Frisians in Denmark except for possibly a very small minority on the south west border with Germany (the region around Vidåen). I have seen many maps showing Frisians in Southern Schleswig but never in Northern Schleswig. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 22:11, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Sorry! Blank1Night had spotted this one as well. Still needs fixing though. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 22:12, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red line 

message: Don't Switzerland and Austria speak German, at least partly? I would edit it myself, but this requires an expert. Dyamantese 17:00, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All of Austria speaks German and so does most of Switzerland. The zones indicated on the map look ok to me. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 21:29, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rest of Europe 

message: if bits of Switzerland get to be edited out, then surely so should bits of Wales, Scotland, Ireland (because of Celtic languages still being first languages in those areas) and also sections of the far north of Norway (because of the Sami languages). --86.144.101.168 (talk) 11:12, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: true -- but only the areas where a non-Germanic langauge is clearly prevalent. That is, the dark green bits here, the green bits here and the purple bits here. For Sami perhaps the dark yellow bits here, although they do not denote majority language, just "recognized language". There are other possibilities for improvement, such as blanking the uninhabited bits of the Alps, the Nordic tundra and the glaciers in Iceland. This discussion should properly be moved to :commons:Image talk:Europe germanic-languages.PNG. dab (𒁳) 16:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  inconsistent 

message: Living in the vicinity of the border between Sweden and Norway, I can assure you that there's traditionally a dialect continuum where there's no clear border between East and West Scandinavian. If one is to be drawn, it should be somewhere east of the national border. // JiPe (217.208.139.31 (talk) 00:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Swedish-Norwegian border
Talk:Aerial image

message: Yikes, this is true in such a domain specific way as to be mostly wrong. Google eyepiece aerial image. Maybe just a pointer to Virtual Image, which seems to be the popular term these days, but for the 19th and 20th centuries, the term aerial image was the term for the image floating in space that another optical system focus on.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.0.12.240 (talk) 18:51, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

message: Hi, coincidentally I came across this stub when searching for optically formed 'aerial images'.  My search was related to how some 'start-up' companies are now offering - or in the process of developing - generic 'digital backs' for film cameras using mobile phones. These are offered at much lower prices than more expensive 'digital backs' that allow film cameras to (temporarily) be fitted with a digital sensor.
I have no personal affiliation with any company or product in this field and no specialist knowledge in optics.
My aim in editing this page is primarily to include some references to 'optical' aerial images that I came across. I'm grateful to another member of photo.net for introducing me to the principle of 'aerial images' and explaikng how these are used in 'digital backs' that are based on mobile phones.
Mikemorrell49 (talk) 11:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing Disclaimer regarding subject knowledge
Talk:American Cinema Editors

message: Maybe it would make more sense to rename all pages about each of the Annual Eddie Awards in accordance with their actual numerical order? E.g., the 74th American Cinema Editors Awards instead of the American Cinema Editors Awards 2024 because it in fact honors films from 2023, etc. The current order of numeration is a bit confusing because each annual ceremony usually honors films released in the previous year. If going by arithmetical numeration, then it would be easier for contributors to decide whether they wanted to go by the year of the actual film release or by the year in which the ceremony was held. See, for example, the 96th Academy Awards, which were held in 2024 but were actually dedicated to films released in 2023. LordTort (talk) 21:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eddie Awards editions numeration
Talk:Ambassador City Jomtien

message: At the time I wrote the article, it was listed in the About.com article and on the hotel's web site as having 5,100 rooms, then the world's largest. As another editor recently noted, travel sites only show "about 4,200" rooms, and it is no longer listed in About.com's list of largest hotels. Some evidence, like the redirection of the previous web site link to another named hotel, seems to indicate that the Ambassador City Jomtien perhaps split into a number of separate hotels, or redeployed some of its rooms as apartments, condos, or time-shares. Very strange. --MCB 23:43, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of rooms
Talk:American Society of Cinematographers

message: Hello, 
I was wondering whether the edits I created were objective, factual and used sources that showed this as well. If not, what do you reckon needs expanding and greater emphasis! I also believe that a greater explanation of the subsection "publication" needs to be expanded, with a greater variety of sources 
SWE 2018 (talk) 13:05, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits created on the American Society of Cinematographers
Talk:The Spiderwick Chronicles (film)

message: I know the article says the film is due for release on February 14, but I've seen trailers on TV claiming a release date of the 15th. So...um, which is it? Raven23 (talk) 14:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date? 

message: I've just made another extensive edit to shorten the plot section, per the WikiProject Film guidelines. I realize that some people may feel that every detail is necessary, but this section is meant to give an overview—if people need details, they can watch the movie. Feel free to make grammatical and copyediting changes, but please do not lengthen the section by more than perhaps a few sentences. Mr. Absurd (talk) 03:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Length of Plot section

message: I've removed the cast list because the actor's names are already included in the plot summary, as per the WikiProject film guidelines. Please don't add the list back in, as it's unnecessary. Mr. Absurd (talk) 03:48, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cast list

message: It says that the movie takes place over one day. I think that that is an original interpretation, as there is no offical mention of how long the movie's timeframe is. Tutthoth-Ankhre (talk) 17:31, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that is original research; I've removed it. Mr. Absurd (talk) 03:38, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  One day? 

message: The article says that Izabella Miko plays Hogsqueal. Doesn't she play the Elf queen?--Midasminus 18:05, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hogsqueal

message: Imoogi Roar
&
Buraki Die Roar Enjoy 2400:AC40:620:4D0E:5C86:BE0:5E0D:4C00 (talk) 14:23, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Troll Cave Like D-wars 2007 sound creatures
Template talk:Stephen Schwartz

message: Hey theres loads of red links on this template - it needs sorting out. I know nothing about the subject so I can't do it.-- Flutefluteflute Talk Contributions 16:41, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed Butterflies are Free from the template. This was not a musical, but a play to which Schwartz contributed one song. It seems misleading to list it among the rest of his full-fledged musical projects. SFTVLGUY2 22:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Red Links

message: Could whoever added "Cartoon All-Stars 2000's" PLEASE explain where the heck they heard of this project? There is absolutely no proof to back that claim up. I know. I checked through Google.
I've already asked that--Hailey 23:56, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cartoon All-Stars...2000's?
Talk:Animation camera

message: I agree with the merge proposal.Shawn in Montreal 13:54, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, rostrum camera is probably the most precise (and commonly used in the industry) name. Girolamo Savonarola 16:48, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that in the animation community, animation camera is the more common term (it sure is where I work, at the National Film Board of Canada). Maybe rostrum camera is more used outside the animation community...? Shawn in Montreal 16:29, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd go for "animation camera" as the main article. Others as redirects. --Janke | Talk 06:03, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: They'e different. You use an animation camera without the stand when you shoot stop motion, such as puppet or clay animation. --Janke | Talk 13:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merging with animation stand
Talk:Rostrum camera

message: I don't object. --Janke | Talk 08:29, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the merge proposal from the article, per above consensus. Now should animation stand and animation camera be merged? Discuss at Talk:Animation camera. --Smalljim 12:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Animation Camera 

message: This article has a very close relationship to Ken Burns effect. There's a argument for merging these two articles, although perhaps a knowledgable editor might start by adding cross-references between these two articles instead? There also appears to be some British (rostrum) vs. American (Burns) cultural / film industry separation. Andrew Oakley (talk) 13:27, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship to [[Ken Burns effect]]
Talk:Hermann Wilhelm Vogel

message: Although it's great to have a photo for the article - I have some doubts as to the subject. The inscription under the photo clearly says "J W Vogel", not "H W Vogel". Am I missing something? Pinkville 23:54, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: see Sütterlin.  It is clearly an H.  Thanks to my friend Dominic for pointing me to this authoritative information. Dicklyon 02:04, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Talk:Safra Catz

message: This bio cites famouswhy.com as its source for her date of birth.  Since that site looks like it is WP:USERGENERATED, I have marked famouswhy.com as being a potentially unreliable source.  67.101.7.217 (talk) 00:27, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth

message: Since Catz and Hurd share the same position (co-CEOs of Oracle), it seems like this should be the first sentence for both articles or neither. My own opinion is that Catz' current position as co-CEO of Oracle is the most important way to describe her in an encyclopedic, relevant manner in one line, and is probably the right way to start this article. Any objections?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccheever (talk • contribs) 19:57, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  First line of article different from Mark Hurd's?
Talk:Scenic painting (theatre)

message: This article seems to focus pretty much exclusively on the present day, and some of its comments about the past seem just wrong. For example, it says:
:Traditionally, scenic painters are drawn from the ranks of scenic designers, and in many cases designers paint their own works.
But this isn't really true, at least if "traditionally" takes a view longer than a few decades. In 18th- and 19th-century European theatre, theatre painting (German Theatermalerei) was a full-fledged profession, often engaged in by serious painters for at least parts of their careers, and was rarely done by designers themselves. --Delirium (talk) 21:29, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  historical view
Talk:Four Great Ancient Civilizations

message: We already have a Cradle of Civilization article, so what is the point of this one? If it is to describe a common term used in the Chinese history of the world, then it should stay. But more needs to be included on how the Chinese textbooks talk about these civilizations instead of the general description of the civilizations found elsewhere. Zachorious 03:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point of the article
Talk:Outtake

message: I'm not wedded to one name or the other (or a third, neutral name which doesn't give rise to a British vs. American conflict). However, we do not need two different articles about different names for the same thing. Bearcat (talk) 05:03, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge tag
Talk:Shooting script

message: Good idea including character continueds, Eickenberg. I'm going to add a mention that they apply to both spec & production scripts. (They deserve a mention regardless because of the ever-present confusion over all the varieties of continueds.) Any objection to renaming them "Dialogue" continueds? Seems more specific. Also, my understanding is that in the case of a character speaking twice consecutively, a (continuing) below the cue is used to distinguish from the page-break case. TimSheehan 02:16, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: CONTINUED confusion

message: Would putting examples of the different features of the script be useful to readers? For example, with the slug section, have an example slug from a released script or something?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tedjam (talk • contribs) 16:37, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples
Talk:Wild track

message: "Wild Track" simply means that it's recorded sound not synced with the picture. Wild track recordings can absolutely be dialog. But tape and film used to never run at the same speed, so the sync would go "wild." It's not referring to "wild" sound.http://www.sweetwater.com/insync/wild-track-wild-sound/
The article seems to imply that wild track is never recorded while the camera is running, and this simply isn't true. If you are recording audio on a digital recorder and the video on your digital SLR during a conversation, that a wild track. 'bitchen' ric (talk) 20:59, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition