Talk:MPEG-4 Part 2

message: There seems to be a lot of factual errors in the article. This article is best written by someone who knows the intricacies of video coding. I would do it, if no one else does withing the next one month. I just want to make sure, someone more capable than me take a jab at it.
::Great, may I suggest the first error to correct is the WTF-inducing stuff about qpel. It states:
:::The quarter-sample motion compensation feature of ASP was innovative, and was later also included (in somewhat different forms) in MPEG-4 Part 10 and VC-1. It is considered the most beneficial innovative feature of ASP.
::Innovative? Uh, questionable. Beneficial? Who makes this stuff up? Note to whomever wrote this originally: please quit writing sweeping statements ("most beneficial and innovative"?!) about topics you're ignorant of.
::ASP's qpel places large demands on the decoder, and in exchange for this, you usually get no improvement in quality at all. It frequently reduces quality. While the idea was kept (and indeed made mandatory) in H.264, its qpel works differently; in particular it doesn't cause such a large speed hit. Snacky 21:24, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article says "harmful effect on speed". As a codec has no moving parts, this is ambiguous. Is it the encoding speed ? Decoding speed ? Some other speed ?
--Xerces8 (talk) 11:15, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  harmful effect on speed ? 

message: I think something in this page should include the reality that XviD is by far the most popular codec of video encoded for p2p transfer  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.217.94.187 (talk) 12:48, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms from users? 

message: This article states that Part 2 is used by DivX, while the main article for the DivX codec states that it uses Part 10 (actually, it states that it uses H.264: "The DivX codec uses lossy H.264 compression for video", but it is my understanding that H.264 is equivalent to MPEG-4 part 10: "H.264 is a standard for video compression, and is equivalent to MPEG-4 Part 10", taken from the article on H.264). Which is correct? Is DivX an implementation of MPEG-4 Part 2 or MPEG-4 Part 10? In either case there is at least one article that must be corrected, either the DivX one, or the MPEG-4 Part 2 one, or the H.264 one (stating that H.264 is equivalent to MPEG-4 Part 10).As a counter-example, this article states that XviD is an implementation of Part 2, and, sure enough, the article on the XviD codec states the same. --ZeframCochrane (talk) 20:29, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The DivX article should be corrected. The DivX codec (in fact, DivX is not a codec, it is just a brand name of various products made by the DivX company—like the DivX Pro Codec, for example) implements both MPEG-4 Part 2 and (in the new version 7.x) also MPEG-4 Part 10, aka H.264. The DivX article introduction used to say that the DivX codec implements MPEG-4 video compression, which was correct, because the "MPEG-4" expression includes both Part 2 and Part 10, but it was recently changed to H.264, which is not good, because version 7 supports both (Part 2 support has not been removed, for obvious reasons, H.264 support is just an additional feature).—J. M. (talk) 23:19, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  DivX: an implementation of MPEG-4 Part 2 or MPEG-4 Part 10? 

message: This article should be named "MPEG-4 Part 2 Video" since it is speaking about a specific part (the video) of the "Part 2". Indeed the parent (MPEG-4) says that there is still texture, synthetic image etc. Why should this article, while being more specific, lose its accuracy ?
The implications of having lots of codec inside this standard is _very_ important: it is a mess, and it is one of the reason MPEG-4 failed. We should not simplifying MPEG-4 because it is not simple: it is a big over-complicated mess.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.49.124.107 (talk) 16:30, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad title ? Bad article ? 

message: Cyberbot II has detected links on MPEG-4 Part 2 which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global
If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://guru.multimedia.cx/?p=10
*:Triggered by \bguru\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:24, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on [[MPEG-4 Part 2]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on MPEG-4 Part 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100420192552/http://mpeg.chiariglione.org/standards.htm to http://mpeg.chiariglione.org/standards.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.m4if.org/resources/profiles/index.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:05, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on MPEG-4 Part 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111101081359/http://ride.chiariglione.org/end_of_the_ride_qm.php to http://ride.chiariglione.org/end_of_the_ride_qm.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111101090354/http://ride.chiariglione.org/MP4_inside_part_B.php to http://ride.chiariglione.org/MP4_inside_part_B.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100322190043/http://mpeg.chiariglione.org/tutorials/papers/icj-mpeg4-si/07-natural_video_paper/7-natural_video_paper.htm to http://mpeg.chiariglione.org/tutorials/papers/icj-mpeg4-si/07-natural_video_paper/7-natural_video_paper.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110122013641/http://ride.chiariglione.org/development_of_MPEG-1_part_A.htm to http://ride.chiariglione.org/development_of_MPEG-1_part_A.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111018071929/http://mpeg.chiariglione.org/tutorials/papers/icj-mpeg4-si/02-overview_paper/2-overview_paper.htm to http://mpeg.chiariglione.org/tutorials/papers/icj-mpeg4-si/02-overview_paper/2-overview_paper.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.hpaonline.com/assets/documents/2010_TR_Pres_Mikami_Gaggioni.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:51, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified