lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Enniskillen/St Angelo Airport

message: Any more details on which scheduled flights there was and where to. Astrotrain 17:43, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In the late 1990's a British Airways subsidiary operated a once-a-week summer charter to Jersey, but I cannot substantiate this unfortunately. I don't believe that there have ever been scheduled flights, though the Council and airport owners are reportedly in talks with different airlines now and again. Problem is, the only planes suitable at the moment are turboprops like Dash-8's. It is rumoured that the runway may be extended to accommodate A319's and B737's, which would allow more planes to land. Dmccormac (talk) 18:50, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Scheduled Flights

message: The suggestion that the current St Angelo airfield article be merged here has no real merit. The said article should be renamed RAF St Angelo and left to stand alone, as are the other RAF station articles. 21st CENTURY  GREENSTUFF 02:11, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes enough sense to me. --Giuliopp (talk) 10:06, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool. I thought it would, I stayed up all night working on it. I now have the urge to do the same for the airport article, the RAF Castle Archdale one and the non-existant RAF Killadeas page, but I need some sleep first. 21st CENTURY  GREENSTUFF 10:38, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger request
Talk:Cessna 425

message: # This is written like a magazine (or maybe even as a blog) article, not an encyclopedia entry. MEGA re-write needed.
# Intro section was missing; I simply added a temporary crutch.
# There's a certain pattern of how to write airplane articles. Especially in how sections are titled and placed. Here, the Specifications section somehow got in the middle. BadaBoom (talk) 16:04, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numerous problems 
Talk:Noppera-bō

message: All I can assume is that the editors to Wiki are completely disrespectful, since they believe that not only does Japanese Mythology require any references or citations when it comes to these articles, but anything, no matter how trivial (and I'm talking making Scooby Doo references now, folks) can be passed off as something useful in an encyclopaedia. This, along with 99% of what I'm finding on List_of_legendary_creatures_from_Japan is shameful. So how do we fix poor Noppera-bō, who should either have actual academic citations or be deleted, there really is no middle ground. Duende-Poetry (talk) 17:58, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a problem of disrespect, but more of a lack of hands on deck. It doesn't take much to notice the problems with Japanese mythology articles on Wikipedia, but it does require a lot of effort and/or expertise to address them. Coverage of Japanese mythology has been sloppy for a long time, and the Japanese Mythology taskforce hasn't been very active. You should bring your grievances up to the aforementioned taskforce or even Wikiproject Japan for assistance, where your concerns are much more likely to get an effective response. _dk (talk) 16:15, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Wow, Once Again Another Japanese Mythology Article No One Bothered to Cite or Reference

message: This article is incomplete, undersourced, and needs to be expanded. It's really sad considering that this article has all the looks of becoming a good or featured article if it were to be worked on more. Some of its information is unsourced and needs to be given proper citations. For the most part, more information needs to be added with proper citations. A section on the origins of the legend should also be added to the article as well. Hopefully this article will get the attention it needs in order to be fixed and expanded.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:42, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup and Expansion 

message: Since this article has very few sources. I've taken the initiative and found some sources that can be added by someone else later. Here they are (Note: There's bound to be more sources in Japanese):--Paleface Jack (talk) 18:23, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources to Add 

message: I just saw a person in my mams and dads house With NO FACE 2A02:C7E:446B:F700:757A:A69A:9D65:9A0C (talk) 21:35, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The face
Talk:Cessna 421 Golden Eagle

message: I don't know why one would need to cite that the C421 is the largest of Cessna's twin engine piston line.  One can verify by looking at the wiki entries for the 337,310,320,303, and 340 (that's the whole list).
Kitplane01 (talk) 19:31, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No that is fine, when I tagged it the text you had entered said it was the "most capable". That needed a cite to understand what that meant, fastest, more payload, etc. - Ahunt (talk) 20:14, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Cessna 441 Conquest II

message: Yahoo news article about use of aircraft for the South America to Africa hop of the cocaine route to Europe.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080205/ts_nm/usa_drugs_aircraft_dc;_ylt=Ag5C8h_GbWJBtTTYaF6._RVg.3QA
Hcobb (talk) 11:05, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drug Traffickers 
Talk:Hawker 800

message: *Agree with merge. Akradecki 01:24, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old Merge suggestion

message: - BillCJ (talk) 00:29, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New Merge discussion

message: Please stop removing the reference to Malcol Bowd not being the designer. In Bill Gunstons book it mentions he was the chief designer of the Hawker 800Xp on page 126. I agree he became the project leader of the Hawker Horizon - but that is a different article! Wbarnato (talk) 13:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The Designer field is only for aircraft where one, or perhaps two, people designed the whole aircraft by themselves. It's not appropriate for project heads, chief designers, or whatever term they went by, where a person was the head of a design team, as with most modern aircraft. This is per the notes at Template:Infobox aircraft type. Thanks for understanding. - BilCat (talk) 17:45, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Chief designer
Talk:Inugami

message: From the article "She then sawed the dog's head off with a bamboo saw (which would have been extremely painful)."
Oh really?
::Nah, that happened to me once.  I walked it off.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.209.12.67 (talk) 23:48, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't like the translation of "kami"/"gami" as "god" in this article.  It gives the wrong impression.  Inugami (and most other kami) are spirits more akin to ghosts than deities.  I'm changing it to "spirit" for clarity.  Aubri (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Kami" Translation
Talk:Drumskinny

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Theleftorium (talk) 19:44, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Adam A700

message: Xcuse me, but I never heard of thrust being specified as 1350lbs or 6743 kilogramms or whatnot. The measure of jet engine thrust is kN (kilonewtons). Yankee should really go metric and correct this article! 91.83.12.110 (talk) 23:50, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry sir, but this is the way jet engines are rated in North America.208.232.182.42 (talk) 20:59, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eppur SI muove! 

message: The "was" descriptor should probably be taken out of the first 'graph as AAI Acquisition, Inc. (the new owners of Adam) have indicated their intent to continue the certification process for the A700. 24.233.129.184 (talk) 04:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, I have added text and refs to indicate that. - Ahunt (talk) 17:41, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adam bought up by Russian company, A700 to be certified 
Talk:Yama-uba

message: I'm not sure why a large portion of articles on Japanese kami are spelled with the hyphen, considering that sort of went out of vogue back in 1902  but no matter. I was at first impressed with the large amount of text that was on this page ... until I read it and realized that not only did it repeat itself in many, many places, but that almost 99% of the text appeared to be plagiarism, since the article went into such obscure detail that either we have a master of Japanese folklore on our hands who refuses to divulge where all his/her information came from or someone simply cut/pasted the text in, not bothering to add those pesky references and citations. Either way it got nuked from orbit. Duende-Poetry (talk) 03:00, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Gutting Poor Yamauba

message: In reading this entry, doesn't it strike ANYONE else that the Yaba-uba may have been an inspiration for those soul-eating time-traveling aliens with forehead 'mouths' in the Star Trek: The Next Generation episode two-parter, "Time's Arrow"?  I wonder if they've ever inspired other sci-fi creatures on film or TV.  
Huh... now my headcanon *wants* this in Doctor Who...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.172.206.204 (talk) 15:33, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't know if this is workable or not as a section here...
Talk:Hibagon

message: *This creature was featured in the 2005 movie, Dear Hinagon, directed by Takayoshi Watanabe. 
* In The Secret Saturdays, a Cartoon Network animated series about cryptids, debuting in episode "The Vengeance of Hibagon" after a scientist's brain was transplanted in the monster's body and was a recurring character since.
* In Back at the Barnyard, a Nickelodeon animated series about talking animals, debuting in episode "Otis Vs. Bigfoot" a parody version of the Hibagon where there is a bigfoot who can fly and can make origami at the end of the show there was song about bigfoot.
I don't want to delete this information, but until whoever posted it can show where this information came from I'd rather leave it here. Cheers. Duende-Poetry (talk) 22:28, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: References Needing Citation

message: Since Hiroshima and Nagasaki were nuked, some state it is a mutation. Of what is not known. 65.163.115.114 (talk) 02:23, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't likely the case. There are similar creatures such as the Yeti or Bigfoot in areas which have not had the same incident. I'm not sure who these some are, but I've tried searching and found nothing on the relation of the Hibagon and the atomic bombing of Hiroshima. Perhaps maybe you could send some links in the page? AjaaniSherisu (talk) 06:32, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The theory, unlikely as it is, is presented in "Alien Animals" by Colin and Janet Bord.  They are quoting from another source.  Unfortunatley I do not have the book at hand but I'll try and find my copy. Yanqui9 (talk) 18:45, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mutation theory

message: What does 'deserter from the Japanese chefs' mean? King Gus (talk) 16:31, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chefs?
Talk:Beechcraft Duke

message: Hi, just curious how the Duke can have a cruise speed (239kts) 4kts faster than it's supposed Vne (234kts).
I'm no expert but seems to me there is some factual error going on here.
````  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.154.239.62 (talk) 22:12, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Gashadokuro

message: I guess what bothers me about editing in Wiki isn't that I keep coming across information that is unsourced and vague in it's extreme, it's that no one ever bothers to write in the Discussion pages, I mean, even the vandal who stole the handles left something behind and it's as if actually commenting about what you do here is somehow taboo. Gashadokuro deserves more than an obsessive list (all uncited) of video games and comics it has appeared in the last couple of years. As James Nesbitt said in the BBC Jekyll, "show a little respect!" Duende-Poetry (talk) 15:54, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Ghosts In The Shell: poor Gashadokuro

message: Also appears in yo-kai watch 2 as a boss yo-kai. His english name is Gutsy Bones. In the spanish (spain) version of the game,he is called Tripasqueleto. In the latin american spanish version,is name is Huesos Valientes. Masterball2 (talk) 23:02, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  also appears 

message: a citation for that claim is needed, especially since it runs counter to the 1st half of 20th century & earlier ukiyo e paintings of these giant skeletons Gildedragon (talk) 14:19, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  later half of the 20th century? 

message: This article is all over the place. Says that the concept is from the 20th century and is different to the events of the 10th century, then goes on to summarize those events as though they are relevant to the topic. The ukioe which stylized a host of animate skeletons as a giant one is said to be the reason for the modern misunderstanding of gashadokuro as a giant, animate skeleton. But, that very painting is about the 10th century events that the article states "dates back to the tenth century." How then can it be a 20th century invention?
Having read the Japanese version of this page (which, incidentally, does not summarize the story from the 10th Century, but is otherwise almost exactly the same as the English one) I think what happened is someone translated that article poorly and copied it down here without actually understanding that it meant the giant version is a 20th century invention, but the concept as a whole has been around since at least the 10th.
Because I'm not particularly familiar with the origins and I haven't regularly used Japanese for a decade, I'm not comfortable making these changes. Hopefully it will, however, help future editors get to the bottom of this. In the end, it's pages like these (which I keep seeing more and more of) that make readers distrust the contents of Wikipedia articles.--2604:2D80:DE11:1300:CCEF:3E3B:4208:A015 (talk) 13:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-contradictory Article 

message: How Gashadokuro die 103.91.141.98 (talk) 12:09, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gashadokuro 

message: — Assignment last updated by Rockethound (talk) 22:02, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: HUM 202 - Introduction to Mythology
Talk:Cessna 180 Skywagon

message: Recent Japanese TV and model kits depict what looks like a 180 on the Japanese ship Sōya (icebreaker).  See the article discussion.  Flightsoffancy (talk) 04:58, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It would need a more reliable ref than a modelling website that to add! - Ahunt (talk) 11:37, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly!  I am getting the ball rolling here!  The TV just released in Japan is the history of the expeditions and they clearly refer to a "Cessna", but little else. I am looking Flightsoffancy (talk) 18:21, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of a 180 on [[Sōya (icebreaker)]] 

message: thumb|N1538C
The article says Mock's plane was a 1953 model. The photos of her plane show 3 side windows. According to the article, 3 windows weren't introduced until 1964 (the same year as her flight). Can't have it both ways!
Dan Bollinger (talk) 12:42, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The image in the article of N1538C show two-side windows so I cant see where the problem is. MilborneOne (talk) 13:07, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: An FAA registration inquiry for N1538C shows it is indeed a 1953 model. The photo shows only two side windows. - Ahunt (talk) 13:43, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mock model discrepancy
Talk:Cessna 175 Skylark

message: The specs section is sourced to the FAA Type Certificate data sheet - very little of the specifications are actually in it, however (i.e. no dimensions, only limited performance etc). I have tagged the unsupported data, and if no one objects will substitute something reliable like Jane's All the World's Aircraft.Nigel Ish (talk) 17:24, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense. I see you have completed that. - Ahunt (talk) 01:35, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specifications 

message: There's a typographical error in the title of reference #6 - 1725 should be 172 (see the referenced article). I wasn't able to edit that reference. WeHoDavid (talk) 04:22, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing that out, looks like it has been . - Ahunt (talk) 11:40, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cessna Skylark 175
Talk:Maui (Tongan mythology)

message: Who has access to these ANTHROPOS journals??? They contain, in french, probably everything what is known on earth about the Tongan Maui. Or alternatively translated into English in: FOLKLORE??? Or originally in Tongan in the MAKASINI and FAFANGU???
* Anthropos vol XII-XIII, 1026-1046 (1917, 1918)
* P. Reifer, Anthropos vol XIV-XV, 125-142, (1919, 1920)
* E.E.V Collocott, Folk-lore vol XXXII, 45-58 (1921)
* Ko e makasini a koliji vol 4 & 5 (1881, 1883, 1885)
* Taufapulotu, Ko e fafagu vol 5 (1907) --Tauʻolunga 09:26, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Auckland University Library has Anthropos. Are those the correct volumes and page numbers for Anthropos - do the articles span the volumes??? You may be able to write or email the library and see if they will send you photocopies, but if it's in French that may not be much help. Folklore journal is available on the internet in the JSTOR collection - accessible via certain Universities. Someone else might have direct access if they are currently enrolled at a University or research institution. Let me know if you cannot get that, I might be able to ask a friend to get it for me Kahuroa 10:05, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Double checked... correct. Je peux lire français. Still English is easier. I can ask Okusitino Māhina (ARTS ANT A.U.) for help. --Tauʻolunga 21:57, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okusitino est un bon type. J'en suis sur qu'il t'aidera. Kahuroa 12:05, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Anthropos journal

message: Any thoughts on merging with all the other cultural articles on Maui? I think together they can all make a really good article on Maui, giving he is one of the few characters found throughout all Polynesia. This info would then become a section of the larger one, but I feel it would defiantly create an excellent and informative article on a pan-Polynesian character. Big-bad-juju (talk) 15:42, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Cessna 140

message: I believe that the vinyl(?) seat upholstery, rudder pedals, door panels, carpet, and radios in the recently-added 140 photo are NOT the same style as the originals. I think this should be mentioned in the photo caption. Can anyone confirm? Carguychris (talk) 16:03, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 140 interior photo
Talk:Cessna 185 Skywagon

message: As per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Aircraft/page_content#Images I suggest that this new image be removed from the article for two reasons: 
# the technical image quality is very poor - washed out colours, poor focus, etc 
# The primary focus of the picture is of a woman posing in front of the aircraft and not the aircraft and 
This is really a "tourist photo" and not of the normal image or subject quality one would expect in an encyclopedia. If anyone objects to removing it please indicate your reasons. - Ahunt (talk) 15:26, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, lacking any objections it will be removed - Ahunt (talk) 19:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image added

message: The redirections from Cessna Skywagon and Skywagon to this article seem a bit myopic because the Skywagon name applies equally to the 185 and later versions of the 180.  I propose instead to change (1) the Skywagon page to a redirect to Cessna Skywagon and (2) the Cessna Skywagon page to become a disambiguation page that points to both this article as well as to Cessna 180.  Comments, please? Jim Ward (talk) 02:16, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually the Skywagon name was also used for certain 206 & 207 models as well, as explained in that article, so would suggest adding them to the disambig page! Good plan - go for it! - Ahunt (talk) 13:09, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point about the 206 and 207.  I'll wait a short while for others to comment before acting on this. Jim Ward (talk) 15:23, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with a dab page but note the 206 was the Super Skywagon not Skywagon. MilborneOne (talk) 18:46, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite true it was, but the 207 was called "Skywagon" for a while, prior to "Stationair 7" and "8". I think they all should still be listed on the proposed dab page. - Ahunt (talk) 21:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes no problem with the 207 ,just wanted to make clear that the 206 was a Super - still can be on the dab page. MilborneOne (talk) 21:17, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

text: Sensing an overabundance of agreement, it's done. Jim Ward (talk) 21:21, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good! - Ahunt (talk) 21:40, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing redirects from Cessna Skywagon and Skywagon to disambiguation 

message: I added Laos to the list of operators, but lack the skills to dub in the now obsolete national marking of the Kingdom of Laos. However, it should not be difficult to locate, as the Erawan, or three-headed elephant, is also the national marking of Thailand.
Georgejdorner (talk) 19:33, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. - Ahunt (talk) 20:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laotian flag needed. 
Talk:Reims-Cessna F406 Caravan II

message: This article mentions that there is an reason why this aircraft has a benefit over the standard one engine caravan in European regions.
EASA opinion 06/2015 has been submitted to council for adaption. This affects restarting the production of this aircraft 109.37.154.207 (talk) 21:53, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What reliable sources cover this, especially in a way that doesn't violate WP:NOTNEWS? And what reliable sources still mention restart of production as viable possibilty? BilCat (talk) 22:44, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention EASA opinion 06/2015
Talk:Tynan Abbey

message: Could someone please assess this article so one knows where it stands and how much improvement is necessary.  Thank you. --Counter-revolutionary 14:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not submit it as a good article candidate? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is simply not a "B" Sarah777 (talk) 22:25, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment