lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Latin kings of Alba Longa family tree

message: On 27 November 2006, 204.60.103.130 vandalized this article by replacing Allodius with Jerald W.. This anonymous contributor should be warned.
I have removed Jerald W., but have not restored Allodius, or more correctly Alladius, because this template already includes Romulus Silvius. The name of the twelfth king of Alba was EITHER Romulus Silvius (Livy) OR Acrota (Ovid) OR Alladius (Dionysius).  Pasquale 18:43, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If the three names all refer to the same person, perhaps redirects should be set up. —Angr 20:02, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Angr, I went for Romulus Silvius (Livy) over Alladius (Dionysius) in the template for two reasons: (1) The template already seemed to favor Livy over Dionysius because it listed Atys (Livy) rather than Capetus (Dionysius) as the king between Alba and Capys; (2) Romulus Silvius (Livy) already has an article while Alladius (Dionysius) does not. Anyway, this is just a schematic template. The article Latin kings explains everything. My main concern was (1) to remove Jerald W. (in place of earlier Alladius), the result of the vandalism I reported, which you don't comment about; and (2) remove the additional generation in the tree caused by the previous insertion of Alladius between Romulus Silvius and Aventinus, when in fact Alladius (Dionysius) occupies the same place as Romulus Silvius (Livy) in the sequence.  Pasquale 22:44, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: I have made a series of edits. 
# The first major edit (14:40, 14 October 2017‎) converted this sidebar template into one that could reside on the side or as a collapsible bar which is more common for family trees.
#I then went through the links in article space and moved them all down into their own sections in the collapsed bar format.  This proved to clean up a lot of articles particularly those that were stubs or start articles.
#I also converted the table in the article Kings of Alba Longa (diff) to use this table. That should help to make sure that any changes made to this template's content are viewed by more people and it will keep the two in synchronisation (as there is now only one copy). 
#I then simplified the header code in this template so that it no longer supports the sidebar code (15:17, 14 October 2017‎).
-- PBS (talk) 12:32, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sidbar to collapsable family tree
Talk:J. B. Patnaik

message: Note:  Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 02:57, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Orissa Addition
Talk:Barbara McNair

message: What a beautiful voice. Wonderful lady. Rest in peace.--MrEguy  |  ♠♥♣♦ 20:55, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It would seem like an obvious thing to have. Also, I think it was Natasha Richardson who died after hitting her head in a skiing accident. And it doesn't matter how health conscious a person is, if they smoke they can get throat cnncer.
__209.179.23.132 (talk) 03:26, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no discography? 
Talk:Jagadish Shettar

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 04:12, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 
Talk:USS Louisville (CA-28)

message: I find it interesting that nothing is mentioned in the article that the USS Louisville (CA 28) arrives at New York on January 22, 1941 with $148,342.212.55 in British gold brought from Simonstown, South Africa, to be deposited in American banks. This is per the U.S. Navy News Service. I assume the dollar amount mentioned is $148 million plus, though the use of periods rather than commas is interesting to say the least.2602:252:D70:9C80:C1E3:E705:BD46:2C25 (talk) 21:05, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not mentioned.
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Mitsos

message: This is not about trying to censor an editor for his personal views. It is about Mitsos' counterproductive and insulting behaviour in his edits and in his interactions with other editors on talk pages. Yes, he has made excuses for his poor behaviour, but those excuses are weak, and do not justify his actions. He has shown no evidence that he will change his bad-faith edits and personal attacks unless he faces some kind of sanction. The examples given in this RFC are just a cross-section of offences, and in no way represent the complete list. Spylab 11:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am afraid I cannot distinguish that "poor behavior" through all this garbage. Care to please point out which of these 30 diffs are "offences"? I am not supporting the guy (I hate racism, nazism etc). I just cannot focus. NikoSilver 11:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What this is really about

message: Wow, what an incredible waste of time this was! Haber 21:53, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Results?
Talk:Jim Kurose

message: Is there middletown in Massachusetts?
Yes.
http://townofmiddleton.org/Pages/index
Emeryberger (talk) 01:11, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This person is notable because:
* He is the author of a very well known and widely used textbook
* Has published more than average number of papers
Leotolstoy 23:22, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability and stub status
Talk:Cleveland Browns archives

message: I've started this article to cut down on the ridiculous size of the original Cleveland Browns article. It needs some work, including (among other possibilities):
*An intro
*Something that ties the sections and summarizes them
*More Stats 
I do not have the time to personally do this in an expedient manner, and I welcome you to please feel free in contributing to this page. All that I ask is that you keep any add-ons historically related (no current events or personal opinions please) and that you cite your sources. If you do not know how to do this, please see: Wikipedia:Citing sources Thanks! Ryecatcher773 18:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Attention Browns Fans and/or NFL History Buffs

message: This article is one-of-a-kind as far as NFL team articles go. All of its information is either contained on the main article or could easily be, as with most other team articles. I might nominate this article for deletion. If you have an objection, please voice it. Pats1 19:21, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If players or statistics in the main article are a problem, I suggest the creation of Browns' players and Browns' stats articles. Pats1 19:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose?
Talk:Photoevaporation

message: I took the liberty of placing this article into :Category:Astronomy. I looked at that category and didn't see a subcategory that seemed appropriate. However, I'm certainly no astronomer, and if there is a subcategory that would be better, please change the category designation here. --Tkynerd 19:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category? 

message: There seems to be a contradiction of sorts with the article on Extrasolar Planets, which states that "Recent observations by the Spitzer Space Telescope indicate that stars of spectral category O, which are much hotter than our Sun, produce a photo-evaporation effect that inhibits planetary formation." In the article on photo-evaporation proper, it states that "Because of this effect, the presence of massive stars in a star forming region is thought to have a great effect on planet formation from the disk around a young stellar object, though it is not yet clear if this effect decelerates or accelerates it." As the former statement references a published 2006 paper by Linda Vu, whereas the latter statement does not reference a definite source, I am inclined to believe that the former statement should be retained, however, as I am not an astronomer or a scientist, I don't think I am particularly qualified to enter educated opinion or the like. Any takers on this? Midgardmetal (talk) 15:22, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction?
Talk:Magneto-optical trap

message: Invalid link in references: -Liwag, John Waruel F. Cooling and trapping of 87Rb atoms in a magneto-optical trap using low-power diode lasers, Thesis 621.39767 L767c (1999)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Troponin (talk • contribs) 19:04, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This specific figure is widely used in expert level discussion of the operation of the MOT, and clearly states that the transitions from P1/2 to P3/2 are forbidden (although without mentioning why) 92.238.51.1 (talk) 08:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Bolventor

message: I have taken out 'central Cornwall' as not meaningful: it needs to say whether it is North Cornwall District or Caradon (I suspect the latter)----Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 11:12, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: North Cornwall (part of Altarnun parish).--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 14:07, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Seyahatnâme

message: There seem like many problems with this article. There is one notable Seyahatname, and that's of Evliya Çelebi. Also his name is known, not unknown. Beshogur (talk) 19:42, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. This article either needs to be renamed "Seyahatnâme (Evliya Çelebi)" with an alternate article for the literary form of the seyahatnâme, or alternatively rewritten so as to make it clear that the topic of the article is Evliya Çelebi's Seyahatnâme, with perhaps a passing reference to the literary form that (as far as I know) it spawned/popularized. yaguzi (talk) 00:20, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems
Talk:Cauchy's theorem (geometry)

message: Question: I'm not a math person, but wiki-ing "Cauchy's theorem" brings up 3-4 other rules he made, or were named after him. Is this one of those, and should be merged or re-directed? Or is it another one, which should be added to th disambig page? Cantras 19:17, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a different one.  I will add it to disambig page later today.  Mhym 19:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

message: There are about a dozen different small generalizations of the Cauchy theorem mentioned in the Connelly's article.  They are nice, but not impressive, which is why I didn't include them.  Including "orthogonal polyhedra" feels like recentism and undue weight.  Please explain here why this is say more impressive than non-convex polyhedra where 4-saddle points are allowed.  Mhym (talk) 00:31, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref removed
Talk:Licentiate of Sacred Theology

message: It would be nice if the article contained a list of institutions that offer the STL. (I'd provide it myself but I don't know where to find the information.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrislife (talk • contribs) 
:The list is contained in Pontifical university#List of Pontifical Faculties.  There is a wikilink to the main article Pontifical university in the first paragraph of this article. -- Cat Whisperer 20:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The SapC references are now superseded in VG - Need to update. Sev112507 (talk) 03:17, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:Euouae

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 11:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: A definite page for expansion for its music theoretical usage.  Might eventually be better moved to "differentia" since that's what it's called by music theorists. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mscuthbert (talk • contribs) 18:23, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important page, but not for scrabble word, etc. 

message: I don't edit Wikipedia, so I don't know the correct way to bring this up. Apologies.
This article claims "euouae" is the longest word in the English language consisting entirely of vowels, and is the word in the English language with the longest substring consisting entirely of vowels. However, I can't find any mention of "euouae" in an English dictionary other than "wiktionary." Notably, the OED has no entry for this "word." Also, this claim is not sourced, as the citation gives a page that doesn't exist, and searching the Guinness site results in no records being found.
I don't know anything about Medieval musical mnemonics, so I can't comment on that part. But I would point out that the other citation isn't exactly authoritative.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.97.120.236 (talk) 19:58, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Of Questionable Veracity 

message: The proposed move of a music article to In seagull In saecula saeculorum doesn't seem useful, even leaving aside the question of whether the latter should be merged with Amen. Sparafucil (talk) 20:28, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move

message: ueoeae  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.150.75.137 (talk) 12:15, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ueoeae
Talk:King Cnut

message: I was surprised not to see anything on Wikipedia about King Cnut and so, after looking through some of my old school work, copied and pasted some passages. I know it's all over the place and quite vague, but hopefully more people will build on it from here. 
Thanks,
Sukhpreetg
:There's already an article about him at Canute the Great.  "Cnut" and "Canute" are alternative spellings of the same name. --stephenw32768<talk> 19:30, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Cleo Moore

message: This Wikipedia article states that Cleo Moore was born on October 31, 1924. However, nearing the end of the article it states that she died "three days before her 49th birthday" on October 25, 1973. If this is correct, she died on October 28 or was born on October 28. Also, on another website (http://www.angelfire.com/la/cleomoore/obituary.html) it states in Moore's obituary that she died six days before her 45th birthday, which means she was born on October 28, 1928. This needs to be corrected. I do not know what is correct, but someone must. Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.101.233.49 (talk) 01:30, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth?  

message: She died six days before her 49th birthday  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.34.211 (talk) 01:36, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Days before her birthday 

message: I have deleted much of the material that appeared in this article's lead. Most of it appeared elsewhere in the article and was not needed in the lead. I moved a sentence about her death (which doesn't usually appear in leads) into a newly created "Death" section. Eddie Blick (talk) 00:15, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision of lead
Talk:Virginia Ratifying Convention

message: This article is a daughter of Virginia Conventions. Editors are invited to expand it along with the main article with additional sourced contributions. Thanks in advance. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 18:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed expansion?

message: :On 22 July, 76.164.80.142 deleted a passage tried by Doug Weller almost two years ago, referring to “the people of the United States” entire, having the right to secede, in contra-distinction to three-fourths of the states in concert, let alone a faction among the populace of one state alone. 
:The deleted passage as written also omitted the Convention’s confirmation that any failings found in the Constitution in the future should be “remedied through its amending process”. By implication, that meant there could be no lawful secession by force of arms imposed on "the people of the United States" by a narrow commercial or geographic minority. Lawful secession would require two-thirds majority in the House and the Senate, and three-fourths of the state legislatures in the Union ratifying.
:The editor making this week's deletion explained, “The citation is taken completely out of context. It is used to provide a false reason that states could secede in the future." Here is the link to the book on page 306: The Virginia Convention II - conclusion. 
:It is of some historical note that in 1860, secessionists in Congress floated an amendment to allow individual states to secede in a one-step simple majority resolution of their state legislature. But that caucus could not attain even a simple majority in either the House of Representatives, nor in the U.S. Senate. They failed even before secessionists vacated the offices that they had dedicated by an oath before their God, an oath to commit themselves on their honor to uphold, protect and defend the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. 
:Secessionists subsequently in the events of 1860-1861 acknowledged "lawful secession" for the purposes of rebellion to perpetuate and extend slavery into the 20th century by (a) singular, isolated state legislatures meeting away from their state capitol amidst streets of rioting mobs, (2) conventions without plebiscites for ratification, (3) rump sessions of legislatures without a quorum, and (4) dispersed fragments of former legislators passing resolutions of secession in exile out-of-state while embedded in a rebel army. 
:-- This article should not imply that the Virginia Ratification Convention of 1788 intended any such national development for the Union or for their posterity, never mind the 600,000 loss among its manhood. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 07:02, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the people of the United States" in their constitutional "amending process" - again
Talk:Canonical equivalence

message: I removed the following statement from the article:
:Two Unicode strings that have the relation of canonical equivalence may sometimes be considered identical, but generally they are not—the "micro sign" (µ) and "greek small letter mu" (μ) are similar, for example, but they are not considered strictly identical.
The above would be correct if "canonical" was changed to read "compatible".  It belongs on Compatibility equivalence and not on this page, as the "micro sign" and the "greek small letter mu" have the relation of compatibility equivalence, not of canonical equivalence.  The whole point of canonical equivalence, as stated in the opening sentence, is that the two strings are considered identical (in every significant respect) in a certain presupposed sense (i.e., the sense of being canonically equivalent, if that's not too circular).
:-- Oops, things are worse than I thought.  I didn't realize that Compatibility equivalence was a redirect to here.  I will have to fix that page. MarkBrooks 19:34, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canonical equivalence vs compatibility equivalence
Talk:Afrikanda (air base)

message: I visited the area last week and the military base has been closed for some time. 86.135.70.232 (talk) 17:44, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

message: Photos said to be of closed base on Telegram at .  Is that a sufficiently reliable source?  Vox Sciurorum (talk) 18:19, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closed
Talk:J. Stuart Blackton

message: Hello! Im Cow Moo aka Dane Bowers. Im the great great grandchild of Mr. Blackton and have information about him if your interested. I hope I did this right--2600:8802:3200:25E0:2CA8:8564:8692:B79B (talk) 02:53, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information about J Stuart Blackton
Talk:Richard Marquand

message: did he smoke? Tkjazzer 05:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article claims he only became 48 years old, but from his birth (22 September 1937) and death date (4 September 1987) I'd say he became 49.  However IMDB claims he was born on 22 April 1938. Which one is correct?Snailwalker | talk 19:55, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How old did he become? 

message: Much talk abounds that "Hearts of Fire" was 'the film that killed Richard Marquand'.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepfreezevideo (talk • contribs) 14:47, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Hearts of Fire
Talk:Locks and weirs on the River Thames

message: This article needs a good map with the locations of each lock marked. 69.87.194.215 19:43, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: map needed
Talk:Southeastern Anatolia Region

message: "Southeastern Anatolia Region" got way more Google hits than "South Eastern Anatolia Region". Also, the article already used this spelling. Khoikhoi 07:22, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for move 

message: == Maps ==
Right now, these maps are used in the article:
File:Turkey SEanatolia region.png
File:Southeastern Anatolia Region in Turkey.svg
These maps are quite simply incorrect; the borders of the geographical regions of Turkey do not overlap with the borders of the administrative provinces.
This is the correct map of the geographical Eastern Anatolia Region:
Latrans-Turkey location Southeastern Anatolia Region.svg
== Provinces in the Southeastern Anatolia Region ==
Since the borders do not overlap, there can be no clear-cut list of provinces in the Eastern Anatolia Region.
Right now, this list is featured in the article:
This list is also incorrect.
If we want to list the provinces in the Southeastern Anatolia Region, we will need at least two, but preferable three categorizies:
# Provinces that are entirely in the Southeastern Anatolia Region.
# Provinces that are mostly in the Southeastern Anatolia Region.
# Provinces that have central district in the Southeastern Anatolia Region, but most of their area in other regions.
# Provinces that are partially in the Southeastern Anatolia Region.
According to this map, which shows both geographical and provincial borders, the correct list should be as follows:
== Population ==
Since the geographical borders are imprecise (they don't overlap with district borders either), there is no convenient way to calculate the population of the geographical Eastern Anatolia Region, or other geographical regions of Turkey for that matter. Any figure you see on the Internet in this regard is, at best, imprecise guesswork. I propose that we rank geographical regions among themselves and leave it at that. --Mttll (talk) 11:27, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major changes/corrections 

message: Since the geographical borders are imprecise (they don't overlap with district borders either), there is no convenient way to calculate the population of the geographical Eastern Anatolia Region, or other geographical regions of Turkey for that matter. Any figure you see on the Internet in this regard is, at best, imprecise guesswork. I propose that we rank geographical regions among themselves and leave it at that. --Mttll (talk) 11:27, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population
Talk:Tin ceiling

message: It was paraphrased with credit given. - —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tardis Companion (talk • contribs) 21:28, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: Installing a tin ceiling use to be an arduous task. It required a wood substrate which the tin panels would be nailed to. Panel by panel,the tin was nailed to the wood material. The 21st century brought innovation to this old world ceiling material with a new demand in North America. An interlocking tin panel flange system was created. This system allowed the installer flexibility in materials that were required for the installation of a tin ceiling. This new patented invention allows homeowners to easily screw the panel into drywall, plaster, wood and other ceiling substrates. It will give the look of a tin ceiling , but will lack the overall fit and finish quality of the traditional nail-ups.Spookymaceo 22:23, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tin Ceiling Installation