Talk:Mullazai, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

message: Mullazai is a village from districtTank District of Khyber PakhtunkhwaProvince of Pakistan.
Please visit Google Maps for its verificaiton.
http://maps.google.com/maps/place?ftid=0x3927d7e85509b3d9:0xff4c8d63623d6888&q=mullazai&hl=en&ved=0CAwQ-gswAA&sa=X&ei=39_IUOucJ8ODtQas74HICA
(talk) UTC
Thanks for that, I was very confused about how an article about a place outside of the Baloach area had previously so many references to it being Baloach. I wanted to remove the Baloach references, but needed someone with the know-how to confirm it. Glad it is cleared up, thank you. Pjposullivan (talk) 20:04, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Mullazai has no Baloach Population

message: AurangzebMarwat (talk) 19:41, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let us work together

message: For the year 2006-07, let us concentrate on upgrading the contents as decided: Wales to upgrade quality of Wiki. Thanks. --Bhadani 03:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Let us upgrade

message: I have marked the citation tag on various - almost all the claims made - at the articles. As the claims are non-linked, seems self-esteemed and just to fame Sarfaraz Khan Marwat (God knows well whi he is or was) the article is disputed too. So I have no qualm left before placing dispute tag too. Please provide the links and nuteeralise the article before removing any of the tags. Raheela Chaudhry (talk) 18:16, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute / Citation Tag 

message: Alright, let's try and have a calm and reasonable discussion about this edit war. There is to be no name calling and no personal attacks. Comment only on the article, not on the other person. maybe we can accomplish something here. Nobody here is better or worse depending on who they are or where they live. This has to do solely with the article.
*AurangzebMarwat: Please explain what you are trying to do with the article and what you have been doing. Please include diffs, which are links that show a particular edit. You can find them by going to the history of the article and pressing the "prev" button next to an edit. Then you can copy the URL of the page and post it here, like this: 
*PakhtunZalmay: Please explain why you have a problem with AurangzebMarwat's edits and what you would like done instead. Please include diffs as well.
let's see if we can handle this peacefully.  A little insignificant Help, it's almost Halloween! AAH! 16:47, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This whole thing's a mess. One of the users above complained that refs were being removed. On the contrary, I'm seeing a lot of excessive, repeating, badly done refs. All the refs need to be placed inside   tags, then excessive spacing needs to be removed. That should make the article more readable, inside the edit box and out. Then we need to fix grammatical errors, punctuation, rephrasing, etc. I'll be logging off in a few minutes. Hope things don't go to hell in the meanwhile.  A little insignificant Help, it's almost Halloween! AAH! 17:08, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

text: I came to this page because of complaints, but I'm not sure what the complaints are. If someone could explain what the problems are that they have with this article I'd be grateful. I've removed the constant references to the map link - it should be present once and once only, in the external links. DJ Clayworth (talk) 17:27, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I did the same earlier but was reverted. To editors involved in the dispute: you now have a couple of uninvolved editors willing to help so it's best to come here and discuss rather than reverting without comment. --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 17:35, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reasonable Discussion 

message: The section currently headed "People" describes some customs and practices of this community, but gives no indication that they are different from the practices of the surrounding communities. If they are not different they should be described in an article about the wider communities. Any comments? DJ Clayworth (talk) 17:30, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agree  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.99.183.116 (talk) 17:47, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

text: Is there anybody who thinks that this section should be kept? DJ Clayworth (talk) 00:07, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: People

message: http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=192140
This link is of daily news  The News
has info about Mullazai in Tank article.
kindly adjust this as reference to article
Thanks. Newsfuse (talk) 14:05, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think the destruction of three houses is noteworthy under the circumstances. DJ Clayworth (talk) 14:07, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

text: Agreed. See WP:NOTNEWS and WP:RECENTISM. --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 14:23, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Attention

message: postal code of Mullazai is 29440
you can find it in Tank section in following web link.
http://www.enttwist.com/nwfp-peshawar-postal-code/
also from Pakistan] goverment postal web,u can check it in excel file 
http://www.ep.gov.pk/
Reference of Union council Mullazai which has offical number 40058 can be found in pdf at 
http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/fullMaps_Sa.nsf/luFullMap/9BDAA5A9CC120337C12575EC0026568A/$File/map.pdf?OpenElemen
source is http://www.reliefweb.int
thanks Newsfuse (talk) 19:55, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  edit needed 

message: postal code of Mullazai is 29440
you can find it in Tank section in following web link.
http://www.enttwist.com/nwfp-peshawar-postal-code/
also from Pakistan] goverment postal web,u can check it in excel file 
http://www.ep.gov.pk/
Reference of Union council Mullazai which has offical number 40058 can be found in pdf at 
http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/fullMaps_Sa.nsf/luFullMap/9BDAA5A9CC120337C12575EC0026568A/$File/map.pdf?OpenElemen
source is http://www.reliefweb.int
thanks Newsfuse (talk) 15:22, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  update needed 

message: All edit protected requests have been denied. The page is locked for a reason. When requesting changes, these will have to have agreement BEFORE you make an edit request. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 15:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. The reason the page is locked is so the warring parties will discuss the problem on the talk page. It is not so the edit warring can continue with edit-protected requests, and it is not so the warring can resume the instant protection is lifted. Take some initiative here.  A little insignificant Bloated on candy 17:34, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Editprotected

message: Un-protection
This article should be un-protected and should be allowed for further improvement
Thanks  Newsfuse (talk) 18:11, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: For the last time, no! Not until you have discussed the problem with User:PakhtunZalmay! The whole reason the page is protected is so editing can stop and dispute resolution can begin!  A little insignificant Bloated on candy 18:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed I totally agree with User:Newsfuse and User:AurangzebMarwat for un-protecting the article. But on an a condition that every edit would be made after being discussed here, atleast for two days (48 hours). PakhtunZalmay (talk) 15:59, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

text: What changes do you intend to make if the article is unprotected? --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 19:08, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please present the specific edits you wish to make. --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 22:05, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: refernces and citations are first prirorty to be improved and increased,that present on different reliable webs.thanks AurangzebMarwat (talk) 22:11, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

text:  postal code of Mullazai 29440
http://www.enttwist.com/nwfp-peshawar-postal-code/ also from Pakistan] goverment postal web,u can check it in excel file http://www.ep.gov.pk/ Reference of Union council Mullazai which has offical number 40058 can be found in pdf at http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/fullMaps_Sa.nsf/luFullMap/9BDAA5A9CC120337C12575EC0026568A/$File/map.pdf?OpenElemen
source is http://www.reliefweb.int
as previuosly mentioned by user: Newsfuse
Thanks AurangzebMarwat (talk) 22:26, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

text: Ok, what else do you want to add/change? --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 22:30, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Am gathering data and the whole article should be un-protected.am in correspondence with other reliable sources,like gov and autonomous sources,to help this out.
thanks AurangzebMarwat (talk) 22:33, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Moreover,big problem is,our country is developing,most of the data/records are not in electronic media/internet.Since british Raaj.so its requested,it must be taken into account.and working on it..
thanks AurangzebMarwat (talk) 22:38, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Un-Protection

message: uprotect this page pleaseRescue15 (talk) 01:03, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What changes do you want to make? --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 01:23, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Help

message: Lot of users abroad delet/remove or according to my opinion ruin articles,as they dont have priror knowldg or information about that.so all who are not from pakistan need to look into matter carefully,not for sake of earning good scores on wiki,all i want to say,make things betterMarwatTribe (talk)
:Please give an example. Note that the changes by established editors followed Wikipedia guidelines and policies.  Also, if you are 58.65.166.154 please read User_talk:58.65.166.154#Mullazai --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 13:41, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lets work together

message: Dear All,please do not ruin this article and do not make changes without prior references.
I have recovered this topic to its orignal format.
Please see histor for your refernce, how bad changes were made to this article.
Mullazai topic is not related to Baluch or Baluchistan in any sense.
I hope you people,specially Administrator will see in to this matter.
Thank you
AurangzaibMarwat (talk) 10:21, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mullazai

message: Is it ok to edit this article again? As well as referencing, the grammar of the article needs to be improved. Pjposullivan (talk) 11:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Edited again?

message: Please can editors read the WP conduct policy on Ownership before reverting edits going all the way back to 2009, no-one owns this article and we are all trying to make it the best it can be.  Pjposullivan (talk) 17:33, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Ownership