Talk:Visual J Sharp

message: i was under the impression that J# in many cases just mapped java classes to the corresponding .net ones and didn't bother with seperate ones. Plugwash 01:09, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  accuracty of diagram 

message: What does the box I keep seeing after the letter J mean?? Please fix it. Georgia guy 01:44, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Someones put the proper sharp sign in the title and body text despite the fact that even MS never uses that sign for j#. However this does get arround the problem that # can't be used in article titles ;) If you can't see it then it either means you don't have a sutiable font or are using a browser that sucks at selecting suitable fonts. I cba to undo it but would have no objection to you doing so if you wish. Plugwash 02:20, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  J box 

message: "J# is generally considered to be a proof of concept of .Net language interoperability, and as a marketing tool to lure Java developers to the .Net platform. It is generally not considered to be a language on par with C# or VB.Net, and does not have the same level of support, samples, or updates as the other languages do. This fact notwithstanding, J# is a usable .Net language and has access to all the CLR features."
This seems too be someones personal opinion rather then the truth.
: perhaps we should add citations, but I think this is a remark that was made by several people (see here for exemple) (to be clear, I'm not the one who wrote this paragraph) Hervegirod 11:48, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subject to personal opinion? 

message: "The Microsoft J# product team recently made two important" Recently? Not any more, now I have no idea when this happened. It would have been better to say when.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.0.156.10 (talk) 14:49, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  An aging reference 

message: See Talk:Microsoft Visual Studio. --Stefán Örvarr Sigmundsson 03:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on J Sharp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131128170355/http://computer.financialexpress.com/20020729/indnews3.shtml to http://www.expresscomputeronline.com/20020729/indnews3.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  —Nnadigoodluck███ 09:25, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: J Sharp →  – The article focuses entirely on the Visual J# framework, and even the first line says "Visual J# is an implementation of J#", which is problematic in several ways, not the least of which being that this article should help define J#, rather than immediately use J# to define something else. 74.96.161.17 (talk) 16:29, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 November 2020