lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Beretta 98 Combat

message: I'm merging this page with Beretta 92 (which now contains information on options and variants) as it's only a variant of the original and the page contains only duplicated data and doesn't meet the criteria for a seperate page, please see Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages which lists the following guidelines:
* There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
* If a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.
* If a short article requires the background material or context from a broader article in order for readers to understand it.
Deon Steyn 10:48, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Drain You

message: ... to mention that ALL the chords are fifths. Of course they are! We all know that. It also might be extraneous to even mention the chord progression, because it doesn't really have anything to do with the content of the song beyond how it sounds, and if you don't know any musical theory it is completely useless.
I think we should edit it to remove the chords or at least the fifths, which I'm going to go do right now. Feel free to change it back. Not to mention, the chord progession for the chorus is wrong anyway...
:I think we should keep the chord progression. Savagepine 00:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A bit pointless... 

message: Since this article is based on the LIVE promo single from From the Muddy Banks of the Wishkah and not the studio album version (Nevermind), you should take the link for this page off the track listing for the album (Nevermind) since there never was a single for the studio version of On a Plain. UnivoxDude15 (talk) 23:30, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove "On a Plain" link from Nevermind page

message: It is important to note that the Promo single of this song was from the "From the Munddy Banks of the Wishkah" live album and it was NOT a single from Nevermind. The promo single version is what this article is about. Otherwise we are not supposed to have articles about album tracks such as the version on Nevermind. mjgm84 (talk) 12:42, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Promo Single release

message: I believe that when the live version of "Drain You" was released as a promo single in 1996 for the From the Muddy Banks of the Wishkah album, that it was accompanied with a live music video taken from the Live and Loud show. Similar to how when "Aneurysm" was released as a promo single for the same album, a music video was released taken from the Live! Tonight! Sold Out!! video, as the versions on the Wishkah album were not filmed on video. The "Drain You" video may have only been aired in the US.QuintusPetillius (talk) 14:15, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Music video
Talk:Lalish

message: Someone recently made this edit: 
This edit provided much more content than this article has now, although it was is Arabic.  Perhaps we should keep this edit and have someone translate this page.  KJS77  22:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Arabic additions

message: "Sheikh Adi ibn Musafir, founder of the Kurdish pre-Islamic religion Yazidi."
(As of this revision.)
Either he founded the religion (the article on the Yazidi does credit him as the "founder") and it is not pre-Islamic, but rather has ancient pre-Islamic roots... Or he was, as described in his own entry, a "reformer" rather than a founder.
This could be a matter of nuanced semantic distinctions but, regardless, this sentence makes no sense as it stands. I'll leave the edit to someone who actually knows their Yazidi from their Yarsan, however.
76.224.35.66 18:07, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I boldly made the change to "reformer" based on my knowledge of the evidence. Now I am not so sure, because the Yazidi Origins says that Sheikh Adi ibn Musafir founded the religion, which was subsequently strongly influenced by the pre-Islamic cultural traditions after his death. So from that point of view it does make sense that he was the founder, but that the religion has strong pre-Islamic influences ("roots" may or may not be the right word). On the other hand the page on Sheikh Adi ibn Musafir calls him a reformer -- and did so before I made any edits on that page. I think that I will not make any more changes. Someone with deeper historical knowledge will surely come along eventually. --Ben Best 20:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sheikh Adi
Talk:Beretta 92D Brigadier

message: I'm merging this page with Beretta 92 (which now contains information on options and variants) as it's only a variant of the original and the page contains only duplicated data and doesn't meet the criteria for a seperate page, please see Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages which lists the following guidelines:
* There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
* If a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.
* If a short article requires the background material or context from a broader article in order for readers to understand it.
Deon Steyn 10:52, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Beretta 92FS Brigadier

message: I'm merging this page with Beretta 92 (which now contains information on options and variants) as it's only a variant of the original and the page contains only duplicated data and doesn't meet the criteria for a seperate page, please see Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages which lists the following guidelines:
* There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
* If a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.
* If a short article requires the background material or context from a broader article in order for readers to understand it.
Deon Steyn 10:54, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read the main page carefully, all the information is there, this is not a separate firearm, the "92FS Brigadier" is merely a 92FS variant (described under Beretta 92#Variants -> Operation) with the optional heavier slide called "brigadier" (described under Beretta 92#Variants -> Options). Deon Steyn 06:22, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Beretta 92G Elite I

message: I'm merging this page with Beretta 92 (which now contains information on options and variants) as it's only a variant of the original and the page contains only duplicated data and doesn't meet the criteria for a seperate page, please see Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages which lists the following guidelines:
* There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
* If a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.
* If a short article requires the background material or context from a broader article in order for readers to understand it.
Deon Steyn 10:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Albion Market

message: I've altered the opening sentence to remove the reference to the show being a spin-off from "Coronation Street". To be a spin-off, there would need to be either shared characters or locations, and as far as I can see neither of these apply. Jon Rob 10:58, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is still described as a "companion" to Coronation Street, but it is not clear in what sense. Apart from the unsourced publicity comment comparing it to Coronation Street in terms of its hoped-for longevity, and its Manchester setting (hardly surprising for Granada TV), there is nothing really in this article to establish the link between the two series. Were there any shared characters, at least at the beginning? Credulity (talk) 17:03, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spin-off?
Talk:Beretta 92FS Compact Type M

message: I'm merging this page with Beretta 92 (which now contains information on options and variants) as it's only a variant of the original and the page contains only duplicated data and doesn't meet the criteria for a seperate page, please see Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages which lists the following guidelines:
* There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
* If a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.
* If a short article requires the background material or context from a broader article in order for readers to understand it.
Deon Steyn 11:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Template talk:TTC lines and stations

message: I see that the Eglinton surface stops are now listed. I don't have an objection to this per se, but I feel some way of differentiating them from full, grade-separated stations may be in order. An extra symbol? reduced point size? something else? Radagast (talk) 22:51, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a Navbox, and details are in the articles. It is already getting overstuffed.  Secondarywaltz (talk) 01:26, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surface stops: different indication? 

message: Do we really need these symbols? Streetcar and subway connections are acceptable to me, but all the accessibility and washroom symbols really clutter the navbox IMO. --Natural RX 22:03, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed wheelchair symbols where the entire line is accessible. Let's discuss the others. Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:41, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've looked around, and I have failed to find other navboxes for rapid transit systems with accessibility/washroom symbols in them. These are small details that can be found in the article infobox or body. WP:NAV also states "Navigation templates are not arbitrarily decorative", and that "There should be justification for a template to deviate from standard colors and styles". I'm failing to see a reason that accessibility and washroom symbols have such justification. --Natural RX 22:23, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh I agree! We have had no other feedback, so be bold and take out the garbage :) Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:58, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: So...in light of the insane overloading Secondarywaltz reverted, would we want to consider removing all symbols adjacent to station names. All of these symbols and their links are on the left side anyway. Yeah, it's nice to denote connections but this is a navbox, not a route template. --Natural RX 17:51, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I think showing TTC subway line interchanges is valid and generally shown in subway/metro navboxes. The previous stuffing was out of line, and so that would leave streetcar connections as questionable. Each station article shows which specific streetcar routes connect there, rather than this generic link. Secondarywaltz (talk) 21:24, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Took a look at subway/metro navboxes in the US, to see how they laid it out, turns out none of them have inline transfer symbols beside stations, or they don't list stations at all. See , , , , . In fact, I just realized they are just like  and these systems don't have a separate navbox for lines and stations. --Natural RX 13:12, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Washrooms and Accessibility 

message: I can't seem to find what these link to. Can someone help me understand.  Humulator (talk) 03:03, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does the stl|TTC|(station name) mean? In the source editer
Talk:O-Town

message: Except for the 'Dissolution' part, this article is a copy of the first part of the Making The Band article. However, I don't care enough to do anything about it.Eaglizard 11:13, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes sense, seeing as how the first part of Making the Band essentially //was// O-Town. Much of the copied language is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=O-Town_%28band%29&diff=18375096&oldid=17909741">mine</a>-- it's no skin off my nose. Sdauson 20:07, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have slightly changed the Making the Band page to distinguish it somewhat. Sdauson 20:31, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate content 

message: A seperate stub article on Dan Miller was created at Dan Miller (musician); like Eaglizard, I am quite disinterested in the subject matter. However, a merge tag was applied to the article. Folajimi --14:17, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant info proliferation 

message: S-town no longer redirects here:  see Talk:S-town#Redirect to O-Town. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:08, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  S-town/Σ-town 
Talk:OO9

message: I'm proposing merging this article with HOe scale and HOn30. HOe is another term for HOn30 so the two topics should be merged as Wikipedia is not a dictionary. OO9 is another scale but extremely close, and often interchanged. As an example, view On30. --Michael Johnson 11:16, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, OO9 is 4mm scale, and has other narrow gauge relatives (e.g. 8mm gauge finescale), whereas HOn30 is 3.5mm scale. — Dunc|☺ 16:46, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

text: It would be the same as combining OO and H0 and half a millimeter can make all the difference! (I was looking at some HO British stock compared with OO Equivalents at an exhibition last week - there is a marked difference, so I would say they should be kept separate. Lynbarn 10:59, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

text: No - I agree with the last two comments Zabdiel 09:11, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The proposal was put up because both articles are stubs. Combining them would make one decent article. It is good to see the support, maybe we can see some more content. --Michael Johnson 13:53, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Sumi

message: This article was originally about Japanese type of Indian ink, and now it's about charcoal (fuel). user:Almsahrah rewrote it. Should I revert to prev version? or make a paragraph in Indian ink?
:Is the ink made from the charcoal? Or should these be two separate articles? Rmhermen 21:17, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sumi or Sumi-e is a type of Japanese ink, as the Inkstick link says. --DThomsen8 (talk) 21:31, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is the original article, which was left in the article as a comment. --DThomsen8 (talk) 21:31, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There are many versions of SUMI in the web for different regions but the most prominent among them is Ametsumi for Asia and the AMET region.For regional sourcing SUMI is driven by the Sourcing Units that is factories hence the name SUMI. It helps in reliable planning, forecasting and works as a communication tool between the SU and the MSO(Marketing and sales organization) when previously there was none but email exchange.It has also been inbuilt with lots of Key Performance Indicators the primary among them being the ICCFOT(Inter Company Case Fill on Time) a parameter used to measure the efficiency of the entire supply chain. --DThomsen8 (talk) 21:31, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Peter Deutsch

message: What is the source that Rep Deutsch moved to Israel? Amechad 11:17, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Nuclear power stations in the United States

message: I propose that the subcategories NRC Region One, Two, Three and Four be deleted and that the nuclear plants be moved back to :Category:Nuclear power plants in the United States. First, there are not so many plants that we need subcategories to organize them. There are only about 110 to 120 nuclear power plants in the United States, running or shutdown (note that the category is nuclear power plants, so research reactors and non-electricity producing plants do not count). Also, most people are unfamiliar with the NRC regions. If the category must be subdivided, I suggest doing it by state. Many states do not have any plants, so it would not be two plants per category. Still, I do not think there is a need for subcategorization in this case. -- Kjkolb 06:53, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. --Mac (talk) 12:48, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing subcategorization of plants by NRC region
Talk:Lloyd Cole

message: See Talk:Lloyd Cole and the Commotions. Nareek 11:31, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: This biography is badly in need of reliable, secondary sources and I have tagged it as such. momoricks (make my day) 07:41, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: I see that an edit I made concerning at least one gig in 2016 in which he played with his son has been deleted as "not notable". I disagree. I think fans will be interested to learn that he has played with his son, who is also a musician.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PDA UK (talk • contribs) 17:46, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Playing with his son 

message: This article in places reads as if written by the Lloyd Cole PR company, containing numerous ephemera, which i'm not sure is useful in a biography of a living person.
It needs tidying up (and probably slimming down) with proper citation added.
:Totally agree. I have added a few sources for some of the statements, and hope to add a few more. Also, the entire paragraph which sums up random songs Cole has ever covered and that completely lacks citations, is of very little value. I have removed it completely (and only kept the mention of covers of Cole's songs by others). Should anyone wish to sum up all the songs Cole himself has covered I'd suggest adding it to his Discography instead. With citation, of course.--MichielN (talk) 21:41, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tidying up
Talk:SummerSlam (1991)

message: The SummerSlam 1991 page needs expanding rather badly in terms of describing the buildup for all the matches on this card, especially the DiBiase/Virgil and Hogan & Warrior/Triangle of Terror feuds. 81.86.159.116 (talk) 16:46, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Background needed
Talk:SummerSlam (1996)

message: Should it be noted that Shawn originally lost by disqualification and then the match was restarted? Adster95 11:48, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It was until somebody decided to covert the results into a table and then didn't bother to write up the article. TJ Spyke 17:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vader vs Shawn Match 

message: was it a botch or a work? I think it should be noted in the Wikipedia article. --Luchador619 (talk) 07:26, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yokozuna/rope breaking 
Talk:SummerSlam (1997)

message: should we add it in that this re started these legendary feuds.. between shawn and undertaker.. and bret and shawn...because if i remember right 1 week after this shawn formed dx and we started seeing shawn and bret feud.. also with undertaker feuding with shawn in the mix  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fingerpokeofdoom (talk • contribs) 00:58, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  bret vs shawn and shawn vs undertaker is builded up on this same ppv 

message: Should his injury be noted here. It was this injury that eventually caused him to retire. Cold Phront (talk) 19:56, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Austin's Injury 

message: Created reception section, with review summary, rating, and citation.
172.58.45.53 (talk) 13:11, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception. 

message: Added tag to request event section.
65.102.187.215 (talk) 05:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Event.
Talk:SummerSlam (1999)

message: Didn't Jesse Ventura announce during this event that he might run for President of the United States? If I remember the event correctly, Donald Trump was in the audience, and announced he would support Ventura, both financially and personally, if he chose to run. Anyone? Sabin4232 (talk) 04:43, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was during WrestleMania XX that Trump said he would support Ventura should he ever choose to re-enter politics (see Ventura's article). TJ Spyke 05:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Running for President? 

message: Although Debra did come out to accompany Jeff Jarrett to the ring, she ended up being sent away and came out with D'Lo Brown accompanying him to the ring instead.  So should it read Jeff Jarrett defeated D'Lo Brown (c) with Debra?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lbkid1700 (talk • contribs) 05:25, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debra  

message: Article currently does not contain an event section. 130.45.24.168 (talk) 22:57, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Event section
Talk:John Ponet

message: I propose to add a new section (after the biography) called 'Ponet's treatise'. This will address Ponet's theological and political thinking regarding resistance to persecuting monarchs. Any objections, suggestions, ideas? Yozzer66 (talk) 16:16, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New Section: Ponet's treatise
Talk:Blackheath, New South Wales

message: I think the "Blackheath experiences an oceanic climate similar to Western Europe." part needs to be fixed. It's not really accurate. Blackheath a subtropical highland climate as stated on the Katoomba page. Dolan80 (talk) 12:52, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Talk:VFA-102

message: A good start with the operational history, a few things stand out as needing attention:
* No need for the background to Operation Southern Watch, that's covered elsewhere - the squadron wasn't part of the weapons inspection team! ;)
* Many capitalised terms need expansion or linking to (SAM, CAP, COMPUTEX, JTF98-2, TARPS, etc..)
* Last paragraph of the 2000s is disjointed - and tailcode disagrees with first paragraph of the article..
* The tailcode was changed when the squadron was moved from CVW 1 to CVW 5. CVW 1 tailcode is AB and CVW 5 tailcode is NF.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikon23462 (talk • contribs) 00:07, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:VFA-34

message: I believe that the insignia version being used in the introduction is not the official insignia, but a reimagining only. It needs to be replaced with official insignia as used on the squadron’s official website: https://www.airlant.usff.navy.mil/vfa34/
I will replace the insignia now. Chrisaratea (talk) 06:11, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Squadron insignia
Talk:Priest–penitent privilege

message: There was a lot of (pre-1913) stuff in the Seal of the Confessional article from the Catholic Encyclopedia that was a bit POV but still of historical interest. I have cut it all out and dumped it at Seal of the Confessional/temp so that it can be reviewed and made good use of (probably in this article). I have largely sorted the English stuff but will leave the rest to better editors than I. Cutler 11:58, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical stuff from Catholic Encyclopedia

message: Andrew tate said so 86.8.170.124 (talk) 23:43, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  God is real