Talk:Arirang (1926 film)

message: Why are the wrong diacritics being used, as in Yônghûi? Badagnani (talk) 20:22, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wouldn't know. Feel free to fix them, or I'll do it later. This article really should be brought up to GA or FA status eventually. Dekkappai (talk) 20:49, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Diacritics

message: * I think that we should not use here expressions like "Japanese-occupied Korea" for following reasons:
1) Korea was not occupied, but annexed by the Empire of Japan and this annexation was recognized by the international community. 2) The article about colonial Korea is Korea under Japanese rule, not "Korea under Japanese occupation". 3) The term "occupation" implies that it was illegitimate, while the term "colonial rule" implies nothing. Elmor (talk) 08:30, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: All of unequal treaty between Japan and Korea was declared null and void by Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea. If these treaties were legitimate, involved countries was not conclude the treaty. The article about colonial Korea is translated words from Japanese point. Is it take a neutral attitude you think? --Historiographer (talk) 10:02, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Frankly, I failed to understand your point if view. Yes, the unequal treaties were officially nullified by the 1965 agreement, but that does not make them illegitimate. Also, as far as I know, official Japanese propaganda described the annexation as "merging", so "colonial rule" seems to be neutral between these two points of view. Could you please explain why do you object this term? I saw Korean publication using the term "식민지 시대" (colonial period) and nobody blamed their authors for being pro-Japanese. Elmor (talk) 16:02, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: However, almost media, books, and public in Korea usually using the term "Occupation" rather than "Colonial period".--Historiographer (talk) 03:18, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  1) You mean "일제강점기"? True, but, AFAIK, even in Korea the most common term is "Japanese Imperial Period" ("일제시대") (Google shows  1,170,000 results for 일제강점기 and 5,420,000 for 일제시대). 2) Back to the topic, do you consider the term "colonial period" to be pro-Japanese? Elmor (talk) 07:39, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Occupation vs. colonial rule 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Arirang (1926 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060204190739/http://english.chosun.com:80/w21data/html/news/200502/200502110014.html to http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200502/200502110014.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Arirang (1926 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200502/200502110014.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060204190739/http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200502/200502110014.html to http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200502/200502110014.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060215072341/http://english.yna.co.kr:80/ to http://english.yna.co.kr/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:51, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Arirang (1926 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927020845/http://www.koreafilm.org/english/db_detail_eng.asp?p_dataid=00033 to http://www.koreafilm.org/english/db_detail_eng.asp?p_dataid=00033
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071008183945/http://english.yna.co.kr/Engnews/20050222/300900000020050222105347E6.html to http://english.yna.co.kr/Engnews/20050222/300900000020050222105347E6.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://english.yna.co.kr/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:28, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified