lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of One Piece characters

message: 0v0v0v0v0 (talk) 16:17, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 19:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 April 2024 

message: The redirect The One Piece is real! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.   Jay 💬 07:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:The One Piece is real!]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: change "Thousand Berry" to "Thousand Sunny" Thekidofgaming (talk) 20:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: Could you provide more details regarding why this change is desirable? It is difficult to assess whether the change is an improvement overall with so little information about it. Melmann 21:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 April 2024
Talk:Atalacmea

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:05, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Atalacmea fragilis

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:04, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Atalacmea multilinea

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:04, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
File talk:F-111-Fuel-Dump,-Avalon,-VIC-23.03.2007.jpg

message: With all due respect, but it says that this image is self-made, i wonder how the author took it. 
Also the color of the flame is not right, more like a photoshop work.
:From the FPC page for the image:
:A lot of people that have seen this have said it looks like I was in a plane flying alongside. Actually I did a bit of trick to get this view - of course all the keen photographers at airshows get as close to the action as they can right alongside the runway. I went way back for a different perspective, say a couple of hundred metres away amongst the milling crowds and fixed displays. That meant instead of shooting at say 45° to the horizontal as is usual for a low pass, I was only shooting at about 10°.—User:Jjron
:As for the flame being incorrect, what colour do you think it should be? GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 00:12, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: doubts

message: I agree with the doubts that this picture is photo-shopped.  A mass fuel to air mixture would produce a much darker flame with soot.  No soot is even present in the picture.  I have deleted it from 3 locations because of its illegitimacy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Antony1103 (talk • contribs) 01:19, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: agree
Talk:Auckland oyster

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:41, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Austrofusus glans

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:59, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Austrotriton parkinsonia

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:58, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Austrovenus stutchburyi

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:52, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Jacksonville Aviation Authority

message: Perhaps this article is now acceptable, most all of the extant content has been removed and it is now a workable stub article. --Mr Accountable (talk) 09:04, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Hang on

message: I'm starting a rewrite of this. Hope to be finished by tax day. Mgrē@sŏn 17:12, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 
Talk:Barbatia novaezelandiae

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:52, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Barnea similis

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:51, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Bassina yatei

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Lillian Boyer

message: The photograph link is currently broken because I needed to remove the photo that I uploaded to the Wiki Commons, as it was not public domain. I have permission to use a set of photo images I received from The Henry Ford, which does not control copyright for the photos, but is just an owner of copies of them (probably some of the only extant copies at that). 
As most of the photos were taken prior to 1923, they are likely in the public domain. To be safe, I think it's best to upload them to Wikipedia as non-free/fair use, not to Wiki Commons. I plan to do this soon, so stay tuned. SteveChervitzTrutane (talk) 18:29, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photographs 

message: Six images of Lillian Boyer performing aerial stunts that were originally in this article were removed in October 2009 on the basis of overuse of non-free content per WP:NFCC#3 and #8. I recently re-added one of these image to the article. The single image should not violate the overuse policy. Additionally, the image itself is an important, irreplaceable historical artifact, and the use of it (and the other five images) in Wikipedia was specifically granted upon my request by The Henry Ford.  Showing a photo of her performing a stunt makes the article significantly more compelling, IMHO. Cheers. SteveChervitzTrutane (talk) 08:38, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph deletion and recovery 

message: Sources that could be used to improve the article are:
*  
*  
*  
*  
*  
*  
* 
*  
*  
*  
*  
* 
* 
*  
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
The offline sources are readily available through Resource Request. --Worldbruce (talk) 23:41, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further reading 
Talk:LH Aviation

message: The article is overloaded with ellipses (...), indicating truncated or omitted words in sentences.  This needs to be cleaned up.  If it is habitually sloppy punctuation, get rid of the ellipses; if it indicates missing text, fill in what is needed or reword sentences so that ellipses aren't needed. — Quicksilver (Hydrargyrum)T @ 21:11, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ellipses ...
Talk:Woodmoor, Colorado

message: Did Monument annex Woodmoor at some point?  A previous editor seems to think that the post office disallowing Woodmoor as an address is sufficient evidence, but I'm not so sure, and I couldn't find any other evidence that it was annexed.  Does anyone have other evidence?
Thanks!
-- Ken g6 (talk) 17:27, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I live in Woodmoor. Monument doesn't want to annex us in no small measure because the low-density tax base won't support road maintenance. It's not that simple, of course, but bottom line, I assure you we get our mail in the Monument Post Office 80132, but we are an unincorporated area serviced by the county. — tbc (talk) 04:25, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Was Woodmoor [[Annexation|annexed]]?
Talk:Benhamina obliquata

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:39, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Marina Oswald Porter

message: What purpose does this sentence from the article have.
” Questions about her reliability as a witness were expressed within the commission, particularly in regard to her claims about an assassination attempt on General Edwin Walker,”
Oswald left a detailed note the night he left to attempt to kill General Walker. It is hand written in Russian. Verified to be Oswald’s handwriting. It contained 11 different instructions for Marina to follow in case he was caught or killed during the attempt. The letter was translated and verified by the authorities. Marina testified that Oswald left the note for her, and contained things that only he could have known. (Location/number of P.O. Box) 
Is the purpose of the above sentence in the article in order to question whether or not Oswald was the attempted assassin of General Walker? No other suspect has ever been suggested for this crime. Oswald’s attempt to assassinate General Walker has always been problematic for the conspiracy industry. 
The reference for the sentence is from a book by conspiracy author Robert Groden. Just providing a reference doesn’t make an entry valid. If the author of the reference makes his living as a conspiracy author, it is a dubious reference. Implied criticisms of the authenticity of Marina’s testimony about this event don’t belong in this article. 
I suggest that this sentence be either removed or revised in the interest of keeping Wikipedia entries fact based. Kyle kursk (talk) 00:48, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions about General Walker assassination attempt?
Talk:Buccinulum vittatum

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:10, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Annaperenna verrucosa

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:50, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed