Talk:Project Gemini

message: Some good content here, but note Gemini program already exists, plus we have articles for each individual mission too. (At 320,000+ articles, there's virtually no chance that an article on a well-known topic doesn't exist already.) Stan 05:57, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Depending on your definitions of "virtually no chance" and "well-known topic", that's debatable. I'm often amazed at the subjects that lack a stub or even a substub, including those that I assume are "well-known" to mainstream society, and those "well-known" to geekdom. Regardless, I'm making an attempt at a merger. Tverbeek 00:27, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicate article

message: Yes, it was ironic that See and Bassett crashed into the campus where their Gemini 9 spacecraft was housed, in one sense of the word. According to Merriam-Webster, one meaning of irony is " (1) : incongruity between the actual result of a sequence of events and the normal or expected result (2) : an event or result marked by such incongruity." It was not expected that they would be killed while visiting the manufacturer to consult on their spacecraft. ITRW, the word doesn't have to refer only to the literary device (sarcasm or humor), despite the lack of such usage in Irony. Ironies can be tragic, as well as funny. JustinTime55 (talk) 14:22, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that whether this particular incident qualifies as irony is a matter of judgment, I think it would be better to leave it out.  It doesn't add anything to the basic mission of providing information.  Let the reader decide for herself whether it is ironic.  We don't need to characterize it. TJRC (talk) 22:19, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes or rephrase it to say like, *Citation source from where you got the information* said it was ironic that this event occurred. MaximusEditor (talk) 23:45, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of ''ironic'' 

message: Gemini 7 is not in the list of fights! We need to fix that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esb5415 (talk • contribs) 01:12, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: , marking as done to avoid confusion. Gemini 7 is mentioned MaximusEditor (talk) 00:55, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gemini-VII 

message: Gemini 9 is not in the list of flights. It's the "angry alligator" flight.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ReedScarce (talk • contribs) 10:49, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gemini 9, Gemini-IX 

message: I don't know if this helps, but this youtube playlist has some interesting Project Gemini videos, e.g CBS coverage of Gemini 6 and 9, the rendezvous simulator, and status reports. Regards, Anameofmyveryown (talk) 22:17, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Although the article could more, it has just enough high quality references cited to push it over the line to B class.  More reference support will be necessary to reach Good Article level, but it would otherwise satisfy GA criteria. Folklore1 (talk) 01:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class upgrade 

message: Article gives a mass for the space craft, but does not seem to break it down into the reentry-module/capsule and Adapter module(retro & equipment). No description/specification/numbers for the capsule or parts of the Adapter module ? From early comments above ("metrics") it looks like there was a specs section in 2006/2008. - Rod57 (talk) 13:36, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gemini spacecraft - Adapter module etc 

message: The wording of the Adapter module section appears to be referencing something with the words ¨ in turn ¨ Does anybody know what this is referencing? Andpug1 (talk) 16:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adapter module wording