lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kʼicheʼ people

message: Looking to make additions to this article over the next few months as an assignment for class. --Esqm8 (talk) 16:46, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Sources - Roads to Change in Maya Guatemala by John P. Hawkins and Walter Randolph Adams (add to citation); Hemnq9 (talk) 16:50, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: We will be rearranging the history section and distribute the information in to a pre-conquest and post-conquest subsection. To the Post-conquest we have made an addition to add more information on how the culture changed due to the Europeans. We have also added a literature section for information on the Popol Vuh. We have also given information on the rulers in the K'iche' culture. Also, information was added about Utatlan, a major city to the K'iche' people. --Esqm8 (talk) 16:11, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

text:  Part of the reason we chose to make these changes was that, with the additions of information we were making could be broken into distinct periods for history. --Esqm8 (talk) 16:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

text: Wikilinks were added to several sections in the article, including the Popol Vuh and K'iche' rulers sections. I also added a picture depicting the location of the K'iche' people in Guatemala and an additional source to the original Popol Vuh paragraph. Hemnq9 (talk) 20:26, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  The Post-Conquest section was edited and reworded for clarity and the photo was moved in an attempt to bring a better format to the flow of the page. --Esqm8 (talk) 22:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it possible to remove the message under the history section saying that it needs more verification? I have checked all the wikilinks and sources, and they all work. Additional information with sources, along with new sources for the original content, have been added to this section. Does this warrant the removal of this message?Hemnq9 (talk) 07:50, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  History Rearrangement, Addition, & Section Addition 

message: — Assignment last updated by Luxha (talk) 15:21, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Rhetorical Practices from the Ancient World to Enlightenment

message: This article was alright for the past few years, but recently ONE editor has made subpar edits with several grammatical errors. Help? Despressso (talk) 15:34, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened?
Talk:Ball-and-stick model

message: ...durch wesentlich kleinere Kugeln angedeutet. "...denoted essentially by smaller spheres.".  Smaller than what is not clear to me from the original.  I'm tempted to read this as ...wesentlich durch kleine Kugeln angedeutet. or "...essentially denoted by small spheres", but that's not what's written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Bartholomew (talk • contribs) 
try this: "denoted by the relative sizes of the spheres" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Makuta Bookworm (talk • contribs) 
:"wesentlich kleiner" = "considerably smaller" (or, more colloquially, "quite a bit smaller"). -- pne (talk) 09:59, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size of spheres 

message: The article as is describes this model style's representation of the bonds as "straight lines" and links that to the WP article on lines as mathematical entities.  Are we not referring instead to a model's actual component of bonds which may, depending on implementation, be represented with cylinders?  It seems the concept of a ball-and-stick model is more general than a purely abstract conception of it.  That is, a physical ball-and-stick model may exist, and its bonds are not lines.  — 63.249.110.32 00:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ball-and-stick model bonds are not math lines 

message: There should be something about the colour codes used for different elements. This thread mentions American and IUPAC schemes: http://www.natscience.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/chem/1605/Atom-color-codes --82.46.155.247 (talk) 18:14, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha, the American one is CPK coloring. Is there an article for the IUPAC coloring? -- 82.46.155.247 (talk) 18:42, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour coding 

message: I was thinking about replacing the last paragraph to:
 
:The Beevers Miniature Models company in Edinburgh (now operating as Miramodus website ) produces models using PMMA balls and stainless steel rods.  In these models, the use of individually drilled balls with precise bond angles and bond lengths enabled large crystal structures to be accurately created in a light and rigid form.  Figure 3 shows a unit cell of ruby in this style.
:The Spiring Enterprises company in Billingshurst (operating as Molymod website ) produces sets for students.
But I am wondering if this would  fall under Wikipedia:Commercial links (spam), I would like the community opinion on this. so lets discuss. Also note that molymod does redirect to this page ).
Also probably my changes would need another section heading.WillemienH (talk) 20:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  linking to websides of companies  

message: Is the ball-and-stick equivalent to what is called a 'tube model' as per like given @ File:RTI-4229-470_with_tube_model.png? Nagelfar (talk) 20:26, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: They are similar. A tube model is a ball-and-stick model without any balls. It's the 3D equivalent of a skeletal formula. --Ben (talk) 09:14, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "tube model"?
Talk:Hamid Etemad

message: This entry Reads like an official curriculum or official PR, needs more NPOV--Khalid hassani 14:31, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like an official curriculum 
Talk:List of Beetleborgs monsters

message: Just as the VR Troopers monsters are classified by which army thier japanese counterparts were associated with (Oraclon, Ivar, Icebot, and the four Victorious Saints), should the Beelteborgs monsters be classified as such?  In this case: Typhus' synthetic beasts, Jara's mercenaries, Noxic's robots, Nukus' monsters, and Vilor's sea creatures? Obvious exceptions would be US exclusive monsters, hybirds, and BF monsters with no real allegance. Pitstain 01:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Army designation
Talk:Simca Profissional

message: Hiya, this is to exchange information about the Simca Profissional.
Greetings--Vee8 01:21, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, talk pages are to discuss ARTICLES, not their subjects. Some forums would be appropriate places to discuss the vehicle itself. That said, sometimes it might seem that the subject itself is discussed in talk pages in Wikipedia, but this is often a part of the discussion on the article (e.g. establishing facts to be included etc.) I just wanted to make that clear to you, I am going to respond to the rest as soon as I get some sleep. Cheers, Bravada, talk - 03:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Grundgetta

message: I believe this name is spelled without a D --Shadow 01:24, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that's one way of spelling the name. However, spelling the name with the "D" is the more common way. -- 71.184.193.224 (talk) 01:31, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The infobox says the character first appeared in 1985, yet was voiced from 1982 onwards.  I think this could be resolved by visiting the sesame street wikia and using the experts there to locate a reliable source.  I'd do it myself, but I'm too busy redecorating my trash can.  Wickedjacob (talk) 10:17, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  infobox dates
Talk:Wolf Creek ski area

message: So, would the neutrality dispute tagger like to tell us why he/she thinks this is biased? While I think a citation-needed tag might need to be added, I don't really see a problem here. I'll keep watch - if no one speaks up in the next month, I'll remove the tag. Tanthalas39 (talk) 18:35, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:East of Eden (band)

message: This band doesn't have their own discography section on here yet, considering that is a staple of band pages. I may be able to do it sometime off, but if anyone else is interested, then go for it. For the time being, I'm going to move the page. BacktableSpeak to Meabout what I have done 04:27, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like someone has been into the article at some point and messed up the second paragraph of the "History" section. Could do with an urgent repair, for those who know this subject well (I don't unfortunately). 86.112.67.18 (talk) 19:22, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

text: Actually, to be honest, the whole article is a name-dropping mess at the moment, which requires some dedicated recovery work rather than just a repair. Wish I was a more suitable editor for this project, but surely there is an East Of Eden connoisseur out there who would take it on? 86.112.67.18 (talk) 13:48, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.allmusic.com/artist/east-of-eden-mn0000134333/biography. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 22:47, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: @Diannaa One  of Bristols worse bands the and  the worse drummer ever 2A02:C7F:68AB:A700:4D9:58FF:FEC0:7B9E (talk) 21:08, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @2A02:C7F:68AB:A700:4D9:58FF:FEC0:7B9E 2A02:C7F:68AB:A700:4D9:58FF:FEC0:7B9E (talk) 21:09, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Davey Crabsticks Trotter doesn't exist. If the name is re-inserted, please remove it. Binksternet (talk) 16:08, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two years of hoax name
Talk:Shivadi

message: I expect that Shivadi will eventually find itself recommended for merger into Niphad, and that this merger will probably happen.
:It is not clear how the information from Shivadi would be incorporated into Niphad as currently written.  It would be a bit of a shame to just throw it away, though—the current Shivadi content is obviously written by someone with direct knowledge so a lot of it is probably true.  I know it's not world-shaping information, but still.  I will try (when I have a chunk of time) to get Niphad into a condition to accommodate the information from Shivadi, which will involve adding actual content to Niphad#Villages beyond just listing all the villages.
If you are reading this and you want to improve the chances that Shivadi will remain an independent article, then please add as many noteworthy facts about the village as humanly possible, and find and cite sources for everything in the article!!!!!!!, especially the most interesting stuff.
* Find really good sources for the story of the village being given away, and try to find out all the details about that story (why didn't the Queen have money? etc.)
* Add a picture of the wada.
* Add a picture of some other part of the town.
* Select a festival that is very different in Shivadi than it is elsewhere.  Give a detailed description of what is done and what is unusual about it.  Remember you need a source—maybe a newspaper article?
** It would be excellent if an interpretation could be given, for example if this festival is done in the Gujarati style, indicating that the people who brought it to Shivadi may have come from there (I'm just making up an example here, I'm not saying there is any such festival in Shivadi).
* The article previously included the claim that "farmers over here are intelligent enough to use water wisesly"; this is obviously not a neutral point of view, but if there is an interesting example of how farmers in Shivadi conserve water, this could be included.
Good luck!  I'm cheering for you; I always like underdogs.  But as it stands I would have a hard time trying to argue that this article should be separate from Niphad.  And I can't help improve the article very much from where I am—and I'm too busy right now.
EsdnePyaJ 01:44, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Improve the article (or face the consequences)
Talk:Baggy jeans

message: The following claims from the article seem to me to be original research:
*They are popular within skater culture.
*Often, to accent the bagginess an individual will wear a pair of baggies that are deliberately excessively large. For instance a guy who is a size 30 will wear baggies that are in fact a size 34.
*Baggy jeans became popular in the 1990s, especially within skater and hip hop culture.
*While skaters would wear jeans that were one or two sizes too big, some hip hoppers would wear baggies that were several sizes too large — so large that simple tasks like walking were difficult because the person would trip over the bottom of their pants, have their pants catch on objects or their pants would fall down.
*This later gave rise to the phenomenon known as "sagging"...
*In the 2000s baggies do not enjoy the widespread use they used to, but they are still worn by skaters, hip hoppers and many others who enjoy the extremely comfortable feel and the fact that their clothes give them freedom and do not restrict them.
Can anyone provide a reference for any of this?  I don't consider it obvious or common knowledge, and I wouldn't know where to look to verify it. -GTBacchus(talk) 01:45, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for those links Gazpacho, but you should know, it's not about "reassuring" me.  I don't matter, and what's more, I basically agree that the above statements are true.  Have you read Wikipedia:Verifiability, though?  We're trying to write an encyclopedia of information that can be verified in reliable sources, not just stuff that we happen to know about.  Wikipedia is not a "share your knowledge about the world" website; it's a "research sources and summarize what they say" website.  That's why I'm disputing this article.  I grew up in the '90s; I know about baggy jeans.  I just don't think my observations as a youth count as encyclopedic. -GTBacchus(talk) 18:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research
Talk:Drømde mik en drøm i nat

message: Any particular reason the title of this page starts with drømde, rather than drømte? The former is how it is in the original song, of course, but the rest of the title reflects the song’s name in Modern Danish (where ‘dreamt’ is drømte), rather than the original forms. It should be either Drømte mig en drøm i nat or Drømde mik en drøm i nat. Kokoshneta (talk) 18:02, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. I moved it. --OkPerson (talk) 19:53, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Since it was requested on the talk page of the Swedish article, I have attempted a translation to English. Some comparisons are made with modern Swedish, while it in a non-Swedish speaking setting of course would make more sense to make these comparison to Danish. Also the text in the musical notes images are mroe or less transcribed to some kind of Swedish. this can of course be altered, by anyone who wishes to do that. The last part of the article on svwiki is about the content of the last page of the law book, included as a context of the song. I find that part less crucial, and also more troublesome to translate it from Swedish rather than Danish so I left it out. // habj 01:45, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation 

message: I have added some references to the swedish article now. I'm not good enought in English to edit here or translate so I hope somebody else can do --217.72.49.102 (talk) 20:28, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have updated the article with text and references from the swedish article. --OkPerson (talk) 14:04, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Are any of the interpretations in reliable sources?  I don't think that either of them would pass a peer review in a musicology journal.  Is Runtenom cited enough to be considered a reliable source? Thanks. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 00:47, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering it ignores the last part of the melody, you are probably very right; it does not pass at all. The article as it is now is good when talking about the text. However, it could be a chant relating to the document as a whole, and so it ends in a melismatic part on the last syllable, common at the time. The interpretations ignore that it could be a chant style melody and therefore they ignore the final part because it does not fit into the typical "folkish" interpretation, which is sung as if it was a lullaby, rather than a Medieval chant - completely ignoring that this is Medieval. 109.59.94.190 (talk) 16:41, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  RS for interpretations
Talk:Saccostrea glomerata

message: * https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/38789680#page/15/mode/1up
Describes state of commercial production in early 1930s, distribution of O. commercialis and O. angasi, and change in growing methods in 1870 when the mud worm Polydora ciliata destroyed stock.
T. C. Roughley (1934) "Presidential address: The fisheries of Australia", pp. 9–20 in Proceedings of the Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales 55th Annual Report. 
p. 15 section "Edible oysters and scallops"
Pelagic (talk) 21:01, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potentially useful sources
Talk:Portrait of Pope Julius II

message: Was this painting ever stolen during the late 1700s?
I dont believe so although it might have been lost to history for a point in time  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.189.47.211 (talk) 20:17, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:05, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:James–Lange theory

message: It should also redirect from James Lange.--Nonymous-raz (talk) 06:03, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further redirection 

message: I'm thinking of soon adding a section like "Evidence" or "Examples". Would anyone object?  tony (talk) 17:32, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another section?
Talk:Tapai

message: I support the suggestion made by Webaware at Talk:Peuyeum:
:It seems to me that peuyeum is one of the variants of tapai. This article has some information that the tapai article should also have, and vice versa. However, tapai is a collection of related fermented foods, peuyeum being but one of them. I suggest merging into the tapai article. 
--Singkong2005 talk 01:55, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from Peuyeum
Talk:Multi-National Corps – Iraq

message: Could the person who is suggesting the page move please lay out their reasons? I'm not sure there's any need to move the page, as things stand now.
Buckshot06 01:56, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing that the person has not returned, and that the page move request seems wrong, I've removed it. If someone wants to put it back, please use WP:RM and go through proper procedure. -Patstuarttalk|edits 21:51, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

text: The proper name is Multi-National Force - Iraq and not Multinational Force Iraq as the user Pmsyyz noted, if someone wants to be particular about the proper title of the article then it should be changed according to the MNF-I website: http://www.mnf-iraq.com/ On another note, the article is not two separate organizations, they are the same organization, the issue is over the proper title/spelling of the article for Wikipedia. -Signaleer 15:49, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem because this is incorrect use of the hyphen (see: dash). —tilde 05:22, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: We currently have two separate pages for the same force, MNF-I, at the moment, with this page focusing on troop rotations. But we have no page for Multi-National Corps - Iraq (MNC-I), the hq immediately under MNF I. This page covers much of the kind of material that might go in that article. What do people think about changing the name of this page to MNC-I, and that might solve the problem and create a place when MNC-I information could go. Thoughts? Buckshot06 15:50, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename to MNC-I?

message: This page says that the commander's post is vacant, but the official website of MNF-Iraq indicates that Gen. Petraeus is still in charge (Petraeus's wiki entry confirms that). Who's right? Mwlin1 (talk) 10:52, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Iraq commander?
Talk:River Don, Aberdeenshire

message: I have amended the article 'River Don, Aberdeenshire' - the original writer had written "The Dee follows a circuitous route eastward..."; as a born and bred Donsider, I have amended it to read, correctly, "The Don follows..."!
: Well spotted! Other material very welcome Finavon 10:27, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: A figure is given in the infobox for the length of the Don (131km / 81 miles) but no source is given for that figure. Due to this uncertainty I have, as with other rivers where dubious information has been presented, painstakingly measured its length on online OS 1:25000 scale mapping using a digital tool and determined it at 137.1km / 85.3 miles - I'd be confident of the accuracy of the figure to within 0.5%. This is of course original research on my part so cannot be included in the article but it does at least give an idea of what a true figure should look like if and when an editor finds a suitable reference out there! cheers Geopersona (talk) 05:15, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length
Talk:Empress Genshō

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drives
Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips for writing better articles. -- Yamara 05:44, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 