Talk:A Very Silent Night

message: As an academic, I am questioning the legitimacy of this release. Intention aside, I am concerned consumers know little about CD encoding processes as well as the playback frequencies of their “typical household” speakers.
According to the Red Book Standard, for a digital audio cd to be compliant – the specification standard states that it has to be a 2-channel signed 16-bit PCM sampled at 44 100 Hz with a frequency response of 20 Hz to 22.05 kHz.
The hearing frequency of dogs can range approximately anywhere from 40Hz to 60kHz depending on the breed of the dog.
On the other hand, for this CD to supposedly claim what it actually does (providing music audible to dogs only) we have to assume that the playback frequency to be <20Hz or >20kHZ (outside the range of normal human hearing frequencies).
This would mean that this CD has to violate the Red Book Standard for compatibility playback. Also, you need dedicated speaker devices that play outside the normal human hearing frequencies in order to be legitimate - There is a very high chance end consumer speakers will not support playback of this as even high end consumer speakers have a range of 20Hz - 25kHz only. 
In my view, this is false advertising and therefore is a scam. --Wikhull (talk) 21:21, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Regardless if you see this as a scam or not the idea is that all profits from this CD go to the SPCA so it is done for charity. I can tell you from purchasing the CD myself and ripping it in the hope of using some application to try and making it listenable that there is certainly something on the CD it isn't just a blank CD. I was able to use a wave editor to get some noise out of it but it was some high pitched sounds. Playing the CD with animals around and they really have no reaction at all but the main thing to point out is that it is just a bit of fun for charity and thats it. The CD retailed at NZ$5 (US$3.85) so not a high price. 202.169.213.85 (talk) 10:56, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The SPCA commented on their own YOUtube "Music" video, that they actually omitted the soundtrack, as it didn't compress properly. The video cannot be heard by man or dog. They do not mention that fact on their website, where they point to the video for a free sample of the "music". It was only when someone called their bluff that they admitted the ruse. I would say that is a scam. 71.187.116.32 (talk) 17:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: However, they only admitted that the sound had been removed from the YouTube video, not that the whole thing was a scam. anemone│projectors 21:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Validity of claims 

message: :Image:Verysilentnight.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Verysilentnight.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on A Very Silent Night. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090309095604/http://www.rianz.org.nz/rianz/chart.asp to http://www.rianz.org.nz/rianz/chart.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090309095604/http://www.rianz.org.nz/rianz/chart.asp to http://www.rianz.org.nz/rianz/chart.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:44, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified