Talk:Italian Somaliland

message: Between 1890 - 1908 the Italian faced fierce resistance from Southern Somali clans. The Dir Bimaal and Hawiye Wacdan ambushed Antonio Cecchi's party in Lafoole killing 19 Italians and hundred of native and Arab ascaris. The Bimaal spearheaded the longest resistance between 1890 - 1908. The militant Bimaal opposed Italian penetration of the hinterland of Banadir coast with the help of only their brethern the Wacdan clan. Later Sheikh Hassan Barsan, a Galjecel, whose worriors were mostly Jiido and Bimaal continued when the Bimaal were defeated.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.151.7.55 (talk) 01:06, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On the coins and banknotes of this colony, the name given is Somalia Italiana, which surely translates as Italian Somalia, not Somaliland. Anyone got contradictory evidence?Dove1950 21:04, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As stated above, Somaliland is an error, so I'll rename it Italian Somalia. I really wonder how this name came out.--Aldux 20:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

text: The autonomous Somaliland region of modern-day Somalia obviously did not exist back then, Dulio, but Italian Somaliland most certainly did (as did the British Somaliland it united with to form the Somali Republic). And that is the most common name for the territory, not "Italian Somalia". Middayexpress (talk) 08:08, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Somalia or Somaliland?

message: Again, please familiarize with Wikipedia's policy regarding non-English sources on English Wikipedia (i.e. this site):
Because this is the English Wikipedia, for the convenience of our readers, editors should use English-language sources in preference to sources in other languages, assuming the availability of an English-language source of equal quality, so that readers can easily verify that the source material has been used correctly. Where editors use a non-English source to support material that others are likely to challenge, or translate any direct quote, they need to quote the relevant portion of the original text in a footnote or in the article, so readers can check that it agrees with the article content. Translations published by reliable sources are preferred over translations made by Wikipedia editors.
Your http://www.italosomali.org source falls short in several respects because: 
1)It's not in English and this, again, is English Wikipedia. Since your source is not in English, readers can't "easily verify that the source material has been used correctly". 
2)You personally translated the text instead of providing a translation published by a reliable source. 
3)Your assertion here that "the Italians brought to Somalia a huge development of Catholicism embraced by nearly 20% of the population in the 1940s" also more than qualifies as an exceptional claim per Wiki policies since all the available mainstream historical sources on the Somalis agree that they are and have always been among the most singularly Muslim populations extant. Your edit therefore necessitates a high quality source, which the Italian-language http://www.italosomali.org/ unfortunately does not qualify as:
Certain red flags should prompt editors to examine the sources for a given claim: 
* surprising or apparently important claims not covered by mainstream sources;
* reports of a statement by someone that seems out of character, embarrassing, controversial, or against an interest they had previously defended;
* claims that are contradicted by the prevailing view within the relevant community, or which would significantly alter mainstream assumptions, especially in science, medicine, history, politics, and biographies of living persons. This is especially true when proponents consider that there is a conspiracy to silence them.
Exceptional claims in Wikipedia require high-quality reliable sources; if such sources are not available, the material should not be included. Also be sure to adhere to other policies, such as the policy for biographies of living persons and the undue weight provision of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
I have therefore reverted your edit. Causteau (talk) 02:57, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Exceptional claims require exceptional sources

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:37, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Sultan Yusuf Ali Kenadid.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Italian Somaliland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.lasecondaguerramondiale.it/africa_orie_2.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:50, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:06, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion