Talk:Military Religious Freedom Foundation

message: An RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 17:02, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC 

message: Does this AFT article step over the BLP line?
http://www.airforcetimes.com/article/20140702/NEWS/307020076/Exclusive-Nonprofit-CEO-cashes-religious-freedom-campaign
Normally they're a solid RS, but the tone of this article gives me pause to ask. Hcobb (talk) 21:07, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFT BLP? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Military Religious Freedom Foundation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121024215755/http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007Aug06/0,4670,PentagonReligion,00.html to http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007Aug06/0,4670,PentagonReligion,00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Military Religious Freedom Foundation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927231107/http://www.c-spanarchives.org/library/index.php?main_page=product_video_info&products_id=200006-1&tID=5 to http://www.c-spanarchives.org/library/index.php?main_page=product_video_info&products_id=200006-1&tID=5
*Added  tag to http://articles.cnn.com/2008-07-08/us/atheist.soldier_1_tours-discrimination-bible
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090401194111/http://www.dodig.osd.mil/fo/Foia/ERR/Xtian_Embassy_072707.pdf to http://www.dodig.osd.mil/fo/Foia/ERR/Xtian_Embassy_072707.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120322055639/http://www.afa.net/Radio/show.aspx?id=2147490466&tab=blog&blogpost=2147489388 to http://www.afa.net/Radio/show.aspx?id=2147490466&tab=blog&blogpost=2147489388
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130102012820/http://special.defensenews.com:80/people/profile.php?pn=95 to http://special.defensenews.com/people/profile.php?pn=95
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150315213924/http://afa.net/bigotrymap to http://www.afa.net/bigotrymap
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:27, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Military Religious Freedom Foundation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080306151810/http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/12/13/weinstein/index_np.html to http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/12/13/weinstein/index_np.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120528054409/http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/05/24/11864635-marine-werewolves-transform-into-crusaders-and-back-again to http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/05/24/11864635-marine-werewolves-transform-into-crusaders-and-back-again
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://special.defensenews.com/people/profile.php?pn=95
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140703031332/http://www.militarytimes.com/interactive/article/20140702/NEWS/307020076/Exclusive-Nonprofit-CEO-cashes-religious-freedom-campaign to http://www.militarytimes.com/interactive/article/20140702/NEWS/307020076/Exclusive-Nonprofit-CEO-cashes-religious-freedom-campaign
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:20, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Military Religious Freedom Foundation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727062626/http://www.militaryreligiousfreedom.org/legalfiles/dismissal_sep08.pdf to http://www.militaryreligiousfreedom.org/legalfiles/dismissal_sep08.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: Recommend Michael L. Weinstein be merged with/into MRFF article. Weinstein's sole notability lies in his connection to the MRFF. Quis separabit? 08:27, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to disagree on this, he is clearly a notable and influential activist, journalist and author. Clearly he has an area of activism but even within his focus he is approaching different topics so is not a one trick pony. It's kind of inevitable that his foundation is mentioned along side his name, as an author might be referred to by their bestseller, it's a shorthand for his activism. Mramoeba (talk) 20:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: The article includes the sentence On November 13, 2014, for the sixth consecutive year, the Military Religious Freedom Foundation was officially nominated once again for the 2015 Nobel Peace Prize (its seventh total nomination) This is a problem for a number of reasons:
# It is a boastful claim sourced to the MRFF itself, a first-party source, which is a no-no.
# Nobel Peace Prize nominations are actually not notable. This isn't like the Academy Awards, where by "nomination" we mean "on the short list". There are literally hundreds of thousands of people, possibly millions, who can nominate a person or group for the prize.
# Nobel Peace Prize nominations are not fully verifiable in the short term; the Nobel folks don't release the list of nominees for fifty years.
#The sentence is a mess, making it sound like its been nominated 6 or 7 times for the 2015 award. It's repetitive, "for the sixth consecutive year" "once again". It lacks closing punctuation. And is "officially nominated" any different from "nominated"?
For these reasons (mostly for reasons 1 and 2), the sentence should be deleted. I'm avoiding article editing at this point, but I ask that other editors review the matter and, if they agree, delete the sentence. --Nat Gertler (talk) 14:06, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nobel nominations