Talk:Frank Stanford

message: This article uses a lot of non-nuetral language such as "sadly", "even worse," "skipped over," "helpfully."  It needs to be cleaned up. Sources needed as well.--Lendorien 20:56, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: ... Isn't poetry intrinsically lexical?
70.55.53.41 (talk) 23:02, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "highly lexical" 

message: This is a really good article now. I'm not sure what the method of submitting it for review is, but it should be. Thanks to the editor who spent so much work on it. --Lendorien (talk) 19:40, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Submit for peer review and GA status?

message: The author of footnote 48 tries to reconcile (by stating one source to be a "misprint") sources that state the suicide weapon to have been a "pistol" with a source that states it to have been a "revolver", as if those two statements were contradictory. For most English-speakers, they are not. For most English-speakers, "pistol" and "handgun" are synonyms, and so a "revolver" IS a "pistol". To believe that there is a contradiction one must believe that the sources stating the weapon to have been a "pistol" are using the phrase "a pistol" in a way that is true of only SOME (but not most) English-speakers: as the equivalent of "an automatic". Unless some REASON is given for believing that the sources that say "pistol" are within this minority of English-speakers to whom "pistol" means "multi-shot but non-revolver", there is no reason to believe that they are stating the weapon NOT to have been a revolver. Ergo, they don't disagree with sources that say it WAS a revolver.69.86.239.244 (talk) 03:00, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Footnote 48

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Frank Stanford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to https://www.coppercanyonpress.org/pages/browse/book.asp?bg=
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110508224754/http://lostroadspublishers.org:80/?p=70 to http://lostroadspublishers.org/?p=70
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Frank Stanford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080518065624/http://www.raintaxi.com/online/1998fall/stanford.shtml to http://www.raintaxi.com/online/1998fall/stanford.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090309153630/http://lostroadspublishers.org/ to http://lostroadspublishers.org/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110508224754/http://lostroadspublishers.org/?p=70 to http://lostroadspublishers.org/?p=70
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080518065624/http://www.raintaxi.com/online/1998fall/stanford.shtml to http://www.raintaxi.com/online/1998fall/stanford.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Somebody put a lot of love into this but also a bunch of original research and editorializing that has no place in WP.  I did a bunch of cleanup in these diffs.  This follows a query by User:Rockypedia at WT:RS here Jytdog (talk) 16:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  More cleanup