lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Orange-lined triggerfish

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Balistapus undulatus (Nausicaä).jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on October 27, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-10-27. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! —howcheng  {chat} 23:10, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Balistapus undulatus (Nausicaä).jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Slender sunfish

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 08:05, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Smooth leatherjacket

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 19:23, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Halfmoon triggerfish

message: Fish articles tend to be titled with the common name  and the scientific name redirects to common name. This article should be titled Halfmoon triggerfish per WikiProject Fishes. --MattWright (talk) 01:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. Doubt that this is controversial. Dekimasuよ! 12:58, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved --Stemonitis 14:59, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move...
Talk:Tetraodon

message: I changed the picture in the taxobox, as, the picture of "Tetraodon (Egypte)" is of a member of the genus Arothron.--Mr Fink (talk) 05:49, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxobox Picture Change 

message: Only a handful of African freshwater species remain in this genus. Others have been moved to Dichotomyctere (most Asian species) and Pao (barbatus, palustris). See Kottelat 2013: The fishes of the inland waters of Southeast Asia: A catalogue and core bibliography of the fishes known to occur in freshwaters, mangroves and estuaries.
Two are invalid (implutus=Arothron hispidus, waandersii=Takifugu oblongus). Note that Catalog of Fishes got it all right, but FishBase messed up barbatus (likely because it was revalidated in Saenjundaeng, Grudpun & Vidthayanon 2013 at the same time as Kottelat 2013 was published, meaning that that the latter didn't recognize it) and the two invalid names (implutus, waandersii). RN1970 (talk) 18:50, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Resolved. RN1970 (talk) 18:29, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Outdated taxonomy
Talk:Kurushima Michifusa

message: Although "Madasi" is in the lead text, does someone know meaning of the word? --Nightshadow28 11:51, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is Madasi? 
Talk:Capromimus

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 16:48, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Dory (fish)

message: What about the Walleye?: 2. (Life Sciences & Allied Applications / Animals) another name for walleye (the fish)
from French dorée gilded, from dorer to gild, from Late Latin deaurāre, ultimately from Latin aurum gold. Dory 84.23.155.84 (talk) 15:07, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dory
Talk:Elongate dory

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 18:27, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:King dory

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 03:49, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:New Zealand dory

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 22:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Oreosomatidae

message: This article gives fishbase.org as its source. However, the information entered, for the most part, does not come from the cited source, so the text has been removed pending further examination. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 05:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Silver dory

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 06:36, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Maror

message: I changed the bit that says that Jarred Horseradish does not count to many hold as such. It is not a universal belief and the vast majority of Conservative and Reform Jews used the canned variety of chrain, whether beet-filled or beet-less. Chag Kasher V'Sameach, --Valley2city₪‽ 06:58, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Almost all jarred horseradish is Kosher for Passover and is marked as such.  Are you saying this is fraudulent? 57.135.233.22 (talk) 19:19, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jarred Horseradish 

message: Is maror related to the Neuter Latin noun maerum (any bitter tasting herb) ?   216.99.201.222 (talk) 17:28, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology question
Talk:History of the classical guitar

message: Is there any particular reason to refer to the Classical period as the Early Romantic period? I have never heard the term Early Romantic before whether in Wikipedia's European classical music, music history classes, or the main texts on the history of the guitar. Any information on this? Thanks. --Amazzing5 16:02, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early Romantic Period versus Classical Period 

message: Could this article be reversed to its original form? I've been trying to clean it up but much content has been removed instead of altered.
Thr3ddy 22:00, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article's Condition 

message: Breathtakingly terrible article. Amazing. --jpgordon::==( o ) 17:58, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrible. 

message: Mainly removing content duplicated in guitar and classical guitar. Genres featuring classical guitars are covered in the baroque, renaissance, etc articles, so this article should focus on the instrument itself. Still desperately needs more references. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  November 2012 cleanup 

message: This is an awful article, absolutely awful.  Why not find a credentialed historian with knowledge of the subject and have him or her write it?  Awful, just awful.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarvinLuse (talk • contribs) 12:57, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Somebody else needs to write this article 

message: Can't we add a photo of a Renaissance guitar (or any photo, for that matter) to this article, in order to help make it more properly encyclopedic? 98.123.38.211 (talk) 23:01, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Image needed
Talk:AIJAC

message: The article as written does not have a neutral POV toward the subject, and also makes some uncited attacks on rival people.  Also has no references. Needs a clean-up.Dugwiki 16:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a neutral POV 

message: Neutralized and wikified. Richardjames444 02:31, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: removed the POV flag; above clean-up fixed the problem. Dugwiki 14:52, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up 
Talk:Narooma, New South Wales

message: Narooma hosts the most boats on the far south coast  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.106.144.87 (talk) 13:40, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  boats 

message: The article currently claims that the shape was formed by chains which tied up ships.  This seems improbable and I can find no source for this claim.  http://www.walkabout.com.au/locations/NSWNarooma.shtml states Australia Rock (which features a naturally-occurring hole with an uncanny resemblance to the map of Australia) - naturally occurring and coincidental shape seems more likely --Matilda talk 23:44, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australia Rock 

message: Several courses claim to be the most spectacular and challenging in Australia - see http://au.travel.yahoo.com/great-outdoors/australia/new-south-wales/narooma/narooma-golf-course-new-south-wales.html which really suggests it is pretty good but Narooma has been rated at 32 in Australia's top 50 public access courses and amongst Australia's top 25 resort golf courses.  That doesn't equal "the most" --Matilda talk 23:54, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Golf course 
Talk:Bega, New South Wales

message: Kind of pathetic; the mention about the 5th place Australian Idol winner, not sure wikipedia has a tag for kind of pathetic Braksator 10:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Batemans Bay

message: I have some issues with the chosen photographs representing Batemans Bay.
For one, the 2nd photo is a picture of Broulee Beach.
And do we really need a image of the Stockland Logo to represent the Bay?
I think we can do a lot better than that.
123.100.34.113 11:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The population of 19,200 specified by 202.77.94.121 (talk) doesn't agree with any data for Bateman's Bay that I can find. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, at the according 2006 Census (held on 8th August 2006), there were 10,845 persons usually resident in Batemans Bay urban centre or locality (i.e. including Calalina, Batehaven, Surfside,etc) . For the suburb of Batemans Bay itself, the population is 1,670 . 
-- 198.135.207.129 06:59, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Population?

message: There is a lot of information included under the "History" heading. This page should be fruther organised into subjects such as History, Commerce, Sport etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andoru (talk • contribs) 23:18, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More sections needed?

message: I've removed this claim from the lede. For one thing, it is unsourced and for another, it is unbelievable. Batemans Bay is administered by the Eurobodalla Shire council, and that's plain enough. No other bodies are sovereign except the ascending levels of government of state and commonwealth above the local shire. --Pete (talk) 06:40, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This claim is correct. Aboriginal Land Councils are an independent body of the  NSW State Government who are legislated with the authority to administer Aboriginal/crown lands in matters such as, but not exclusively, the management of crown land claims, and mineral exploration. This includes the LALC of Batemans Bay. The Eurobodalla Shire Council work closely with the Batemans Bay Local Aboriginal Land Council. GadigalGuy (talk) 15:04, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, but they don't administer the whole lot, do they? This is like saying that Batemans Bay is administed by the local fire brigade, ambulance service, main roads and so on. Specialist areas, but hardly justifying the WP:UNDUE prominence you claim. Get consensus for this, please. --Pete (talk) 22:10, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Batemans Bay is administered by … the NSW Aboriginal Land Council.
Talk:Travelers Insurance

message: isn't it traveller's? w/ 2 L's? 24.225.231.62 16:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

message: This article may as well be called 'why travel insurance sucks and is pointless (for people in the US)'
I get the feeling this should be linked in the Insurance category page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Insurance), however it needs, well, rewriting to fit with the more factual style of the other pages there.
I'm fairly new to wikipedia so be nice.  I'll be happy to write a bit based on my knowledge, but probably can't write a full article!
--Careless hx 20:22, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is biased
Talk:2006 European Athletics Championships

message: Just a reminder for those monitoring this page. Your opinion on the above move would be appreciated. David D. (Talk) 20:54, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Not sure if this is the best play to ask this, but wouldn't it be a good idea to include the name sof the members of the relay teams who get medals? Currently I don't think this is included in any results pages, but would be a good thing to start to include. Most teams will only have 4 names to add. It just seems a bit odd, empty and incomplete not to have the names there. Evil Eye 15:39, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Relays

message: I notice the the article is undecided on whether to list the Union Jack team(s) under the text "United Kingdom" or "Great Britain and Northern Ireland". We should correct this, I think. --Wernher 02:07, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The official site (see for instance ) uses Great Britain & NI, so we should probably stick with that. Punkmorten 22:24, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: UK vs GBR&NI
Talk:Distributed Objects Everywhere

message: original wording in the article was
:[...] their own SunView and Solaris operating systems were all 'plain C' based. 
Problem here is that SunView was not an operating system, but the window system for SunOS.  I wasn't sure if the original author did really want to talk about SunView, as they might since it would be relevant in the context of desktop environments, or if the author actually meant "SunOS" .  I decided to cover both possibilities by changing it to SunOS but adding a nod to windowing:
:[...] their own SunOS (later known as Solaris) operating system and associated windowing technology was 'plain C' based.
One possibly negative side effect is that there's no longer a mention of or link to SunView.  Please re-edit if I missed the intent of the original. --NapoliRoma 16:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, you guessed right, I linked to the wrong article. Maury 19:33, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "SunView"
Talk:Elaine Showalter

message: Does this article really need to be so long? Most other academics have a paragraph or two. This article is longer than Charlotte Bronte's article! Can it not be pruned a little? 86.129.40.6 16:35, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say that longer is better and contains more information. Wikipedia is not limited by article length. I would say if Charlotte Bronte's article is smaller than it needs work. This encyclopedia should have as much information as it can. It is good for people who want to know about this woman, and that is the point in the first place. I would like more information on what she said to anger the CFS community though. A quote would be nice. SadanYagci 14:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

text: No, we really don't want to reduce information where it actually exists. Further develop the Charlotte Bronte article, if it is out of proportion. --Literaturegirl (talk) 16:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 05:24, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 

message: (see this source)
https://www-chronicle-com.mutex.gmu.edu/article/whos-afraid-of-elaine-showalter-now 72.83.221.243 (talk) 19:15, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  suggest adding item re: her work in promoting non academic careers