lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:A Disease of Language

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 11:23, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done (Emperor (talk) 22:27, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: B-Class Assesment required
Talk:Hasnabad (community development block)

message: Interesting article.Bless sins (talk) 00:59, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Philippine Nurse Licensure Examination

message: Good day to all!
I just want to ask information about applying for the nursing licensure exam.
Im confused about my case, I graduated last 2001 and I took the exam twice already but was not lucky to pass. And recently I decided to take again for the 3rd time but I can't find my RLE records anymore. It's cumbersome if I have to get new one and besides my clinical instructors are all gone I can't find them anymore.
Could it be possible for me to take the exam this coming december even if I can't submit my RLE? (I guess they can trace my previous records on their files)
thank you so much
:# The NLE is not about luck, it's about preparation. 
:# If  you fail the NLE twice you are required to retake your 4th year nursing subjects before you can take the test again.
:# This is not a forum, this is an encyclopedia. This is not the proper venue to ask your question. — Sandtiger 12:03, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think refreshers courses are no longer applied for those who failed the NLE twice, or more than twice. Have no source/s yet but there are a lot who took it more than twice without going back to their respective nursing schools. Aldrinv 14:01, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Carlton Lassiter

message: I thought his mother called him 'booger', not 'booker.' Czolgolz 13:55, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I heard Booker.  Booger would have been funnier, though.  --Nricardo 16:52, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled section

message: My subtitles say "Muscum" is the way to spell the name or Lassiter's ancestor. BethEnd 03:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mascomb or Muscum?

message: It's pretty clear he is coming to respect Shawn as the series goes on. Does anybody have a source? Lavender Gooms (talk) 03:57, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Warming to Shawn

message: he started working in the SBPD in May of '95 as stated in Cloudy Chance of Murder and the Pilot for season 3 Ghosts shows him with an cliche mustache L0W3R1D3R | TH3 L0W3D0WN 03:18, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: start
Talk:Hindu time cycles

message: Hindu units of measurement  is  a   wrong title,  Hindu time cycles is  a better name.   Hindu units of measurement   may contain  items other than time , but the only topic is time in it . Moreover, the only  source  of  Hindu units of measurement  is  a  website on Vishnu Purana, an unreliable source.  I have imported all the material of Hindu units of measurement  to  Hindu time cycles, and added some more , from ancient astronomical text (reliable secondary source) rather than from Puranas on website. In future I intend to include citations from other ancient astronomical texts as well. Hindu units of measurement  should be merged into Hindu time cycles  now. I am not finalizing the merger because one editor wants discussion. -Vinay Jha Talk13:55, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Fantail pigeon

message: How to make pigeons happy? Siphesihle Msweet (talk) 20:23, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  pigeons
Talk:Man's man

message: A tag has been placed on :Man's man, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. 
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material.  To do this, affix the template  to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jonnr 14:09, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:CS

message: I can verify the following CS entries.  I'll remove the rest:
*Coptic Society or CS, a Christian fellowship
*CS gas, a riot control agent
*Hungarian cs, a digraph in the Hungarian alphabet
*Cerulean Studios LLC, creators of the Trillian chat client
*ChanServ, an IRC network service
*Chip select, a control line in digital electronics
*Computer science
*Crédit Suisse, a Swiss financial services company
*Cable select, an ATA device setting for automatic master/slave configuration
*CinemaScope, a widescreen motion picture format
*Caraş-Severin, a county in Romania
*Costa Rica's FIPS 10-4 and obsolete NATO digram country code
*Czech language's ISO 639-1 language code
*Czechoslovakia's former ISO 3166-1 country code and former international license plate code till 1993
*Serbia and Montenegro's former ISO 3166-1 country code till 2006
*Caesium or Cs, a chemical element
*Caesarean section, a form of childbirth
*Clinical Skills examination for step II of the USMLE
*Cockayne syndrome
*Counter-scanning
* Conditioned stimulus in classical conditioning
* Convergence Sublayer (networking)
--Tony Sidaway 14:12, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent job! But when you took time to verify these, you could have added references you found to the article, it would make it easier to do the same in the future. Nikola 07:30, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|Verifiability]]

message: Can we have dates added for when cs was the country code for each of the three countries mentioned please? Mjroots (talk) 07:05, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: ISO-3166-1 codes
Talk:Boleslaus Goral

message: St. Francis Seminary is a disambiguation page. Should it be St. Francis Seminary? Art LaPella 05:18, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: disambiguated--FeanorStar7 (talk) 11:32, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:Gwynllwg (hundred)

message: This article was orphaned because it is a duplicate of Wentloog (hundred) (the English name), to which most links are made.  There is nothing here that isn't in the other article.  Although this area was partially Welsh-speaking, the casual reader will find most literature references as "Wentloog", so I have redirected it there. . . .LinguisticDemographer 14:24, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Honda Inspire

message: Hello to anyone that has any interest in the 7th gen accord or 4th gen inspire. I have felt like this page has needed a bit more love and wanted to contribute any bit I could. I hope to be a good resource and source finder for this article
Kooruzoo (talk) 14:36, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  New to page 

message: I'm going to just briefly explain changes I've made to whomever it may concern, while also detailing some needed revisions.
I found it necessary to update information on regards to trim levels, powertrain, and stylings that differentiate it from its USDM counterpart. I also did some cleanup towards the end because "In September 2002, a straight-4 DOHC i-VTEC 2.4 L K24A engine was made available on the USA-spec vehicle only." and "This model was also sold in parts of Southeast Asia as the Honda Accord with the 2.0L, 2.4L and 3.0L I-VTEC engines." are not significant to a Japanese variant of a car that doesn't include above powertrains.
I've redirected to the 7th gen accord for further reading so the focus is more focused, and inviting to include a footnote or redirection of the Southeast Asia variant. We need to keep the focus on the Inspire, and if we want to talk about the Accord, have the information on the appropriate version. I understand that the JDM version may be rebadged as an Accord in SEA, but it needs reliable sourcing. Otherwise, information may be more appropriate if mentioned on the Accord page rather.
Also, there is a lot of dead links in this section. I did some cleanup and linked to VCM instead, but I have not messed with the CMBS section too much, but I think it can be condensed considerably and link to the technology instead of defining it all within this page. So the main thing is updating to working links and trimming the fat some more.
If you've read this, thank you for your time. And I invite you to help bring this article a bit more up to snuff.
Kooruzoo (talk) 14:57, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to 4th Gen
Talk:Audi RSQ

message: So this article states that it does not run on spheres, but wheels. Where at the Audi USA site at this link says otherwise. I'd take the Actual Audi Site over some 3rd party for this info. Should it be edited?
--JYHASH (talk) 03:29, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a bit more difficult. This is both a movie and a concept car. In the movie it is shown run on spheres as a computer model, because it's cool and different. They the RSQ has spheres because it's part of the concept. But they also made an actual concept car that needed to drive, so in reality it has just weels, they did not invent an actual spehere drive together with this car.  --Eliza Winterborn (talk) 20:26, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Spheres Vs. Wheels

message: "the car have big power 2100 horse and 22000 motor 35000/km"
Is it just my english or is that grammatically incorrect?
--178.115.240.123 (talk) 21:59, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Last line of "References"
Talk:Audi Sportback concept

message: What is a sportback vehicle ?. --Nopetro (talk) 13:29, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sportback 

message: There are no decent reports on a possible S7, let alone a RS7. One can guess such cars may arrive, but Wikipedia is not a crystal ball - WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL. <B>Warren</B> (talk) 18:29, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree speculation should be avoided here, but I can't see any speculation about an S7 or RS7 in this article as it stands? Letdorf (talk) 21:57, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've coped this discussion to the correct Talk:Audi A7 page - strangely there was a redirect to here from the A7 page which I have now removed. <B>Warren</B> (talk) 23:05, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Speculation
Talk:Fuji, Shizuoka

message: I will remove some less notable or unsourced events from the list and put them here. Feelfree to discuss. I have rough criteria in mind, but typing them would be too long. Circeus 23:13, July 21, 2011 (UTC) The years are missing from the copied elements.
* Fuji is one of famous for paper manufacture factories base in Japan, Oji Paper, Nippon Paper are factory located in Fuji.
* Automobile parts product company of Jatco, headquarter and factory located in Fuji, also, pharmaceutical company of Astellas and Kowa are factory located in Fuji.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.23.5.48 (talk) 23:12, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: About Economy and Industry
Talk:Marcos Mantis

message: Regarding the multiple issues template I’ve added, note the following:
# The article goes way too much into the technical details while paying little attention to the model or its history and types and development, market reception, sales, etc. and looks like a sales pamphlet.
# Unlike how an article should be, this article might end up confusing readers due to the intricate details and also because of the image entitled “Marcos Mantis (1968 model)”, whereas the image description page mentions the title as “1971 Marcos Mantis” where this year is different from the year of taking the photograph, which is 1972.
# The encyclopaedic style does not include writing just tech details and numbers in prose, that too, in a poorly formatted manner.
# 
MxWondrous (talk) 06:04, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  November 2021
Talk:Mazda Laputa

message: Can anyone provide a source for the car being named in reference to Gulliver's Travels? Since it's a Japanese car, Hayao Miyazaki's film Laputa: Castle in the Sky is equally possible.--GagHalfrunt (talk) 17:07, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the name 

message: Also unfortunately named, as No Va in Spanish means No Go  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.113.49.126 (talk) 17:55, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chevy Nova
Talk:Honda HSC

message: Honda never stated that this would be the next NSX, that was just media speculations, so the article is wrong in stating that evolution of this concept to the NSX stalled.  I will edit this and if anyone has solid information that it was, please discuss. -- Cirilobeto (talk) 00:12, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the next NSX 
Talk:BMW M70

message: From mid-1995 to early '96, six production units were fitted with McLaren F1's standard V12 engines, mated to either GM's 4L60E or McLaren's own 6-speed manual.http://m.gmforum.com/showthread.php?t=306167&styleid=4 174.141.208.106 (talk) 23:53, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chevrolet Impala SS 

message: Could you stop changing the power output? If you read the cite  you can see that BMW states the power to be 300 PS (221 kW; 296 hp). Toasted Meter (talk) 20:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: M70 power
Talk:John Upton (civil engineer)

message: There is another John Upton (1707-60) who edited the poet Edmund Spenser. How can I set up the disambiguation so that people looking for the editor do not automatically get the engineer? DGHeins (talk) 16:19, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mercury Monarch

message: Merge Group29 (talk) 17:38, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Group29 (talk) 18:49, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge into Mercury Monarch?
Talk:Lotus Éclat

message: "The car costed $ 28,400 in 1979, which was almost as much as a Mercedes-Benz 450 SL ($ 28,687).[1]"
aside from the use of 'costed', rather than 'cost' this information is irrelevant outside whichever market that was true for - from the use of the $ symbol I assume that's Australia or Canada.  I'm not sure of its relevance anywhere since pricing is variable and taxes, discounts and other factors come into play, aside from the difference in type of car, production volumes, etc.
86.44.110.252 (talk) 09:56, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Price
Talk:Renault-Nissan B platform

message: This article should be entitled Renault Nissan C plaform.
B platform is a common project (led by Nissan)
http://blog.alliance-renault-nissan.com/content/b-platform  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.133.178.105 (talk) 11:27, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Dodge Raider

message: Y'know, the Raider was a short-lived SUV.  There was no facelift or redesign on it.  And plus, there's not much info.  I recently added a merge tag to go with the Mitsubishi Pajero page. -- Bull-Doser 15:39, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge With Mitsubishi Pajero
Talk:Autozam AZ-1

message: The Suzuki category is for cars sold under the Suzuki label. I inserted the Suzuki Cara redirect in the :Category:Suzuki vehicles for that reason. Compare with Holden Apollo, which was a Toyota product but only appears in the Holden category tree. You will also notice that Geo Tracker, Geo Metro, and Holden Sierra also don't appear in the Suzuki Category tree. Dodge Ram 50 does not appear in the Mitsubishi vehicle category. I will await others' opinions, but currently don't see a reason for including this car (as much as I love it) in the Suzuki category.  ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃  (talk) 20:10, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Suzuki
Talk:Buick Estate

message: I question that this article qualifies to exist.  Each of the estates is simply a variation of models for which there are already articles.  Outside the narrow forum of Buick owners and enthusiasts, "The Buick Estate", as an idea, much less a "model" worth noting — doesn't seem to exist.  To wit, the entire article only has two rather thin references.   842U (talk) 12:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability?
Talk:Isuzu Ascender

message: I propose this article be merged into GMC Envoy. The Ascender is effectively an Envoy with minor cosmetic modifications sold by Isuzu in low numbers. This article is a stub that barely contains any unique information about the Ascender itself, and it's could easily be covered in the Envoy article since very little about the Ascender is unique from the Envoy. Reattacollector (talk) (via public computer) 64.85.150.114 (talk) 17:20, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge into GMC Envoy
Talk:Oldsmobile Achieva

message: There's no way a car that is longer than the BMW 5 Series E34 in overall length can be considered a compact car. The Achieva is 187.8 inches long, and the E34 is only 185.8. Remember, the 5 Series has been a mid-size car since it was born, so how is an Achieva considered a compact? Probably EPA standards, or... 166.137.191.38 (talk) 00:12, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The US standards vary depending on the classifying agency. NHTSA uses vehicle weight while EPA uses combined interior and cargo volume. With a curb weight of 2,917 pounds for a 1998 4-door, the Achieva is just under NHTSA's 2,999-pound cutoff for a compact. With 102 cubic feet of interior volume for the same car, the Achieva just barely qualifies as a compact rather than a subcompact. (Compact cars have a combined interior volume of 100 to 119 cubic feet under the EPA classification scheme.) Neither agency considers overall length in classifying a car. ObtuseAngle (talk) 00:32, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I know but that doesn't make sense. Interior space is nothing but room. Weight is nothing but to push something. Length is what's important. The Oldsmobile Intrigue is a mid-sizer and is 195.9 inches long, but compare that to the new Chevrolet SS, which is a full-sizer and is 195.5 inches long. 166.137.191.28 (talk) 01:04, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No, your POV is that length is what is important. Add a reference from a reliable source or it is just original research. Bahooka (talk) 03:25, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This. 166.137.191.34 (talk) 04:39, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. That is just some sales site. Bahooka (talk) 04:52, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compact?
Talk:BMW M51

message: Hi . Thanks for your suggestion a while back regarding the horsepower units for this article. Here's a mock-up of how I think the specs table would be like, using natural numbers and the default output unit from the {convert} template. Could you please let me know if it looks ok to you?
Version    	Power           	Torque          	Years
M51D25 UL  	at 4800 rpm	at 1900 rpm	1991–1997
M51D25 OL  	at 4800 rpm	at 2200 rpm	1991–1996
X25DT      	at 4800 rpm	at 1400 rpm	1994–2001
M51D25TÜ UL	at 4800 rpm	at 1900 rpm	1996–1998
M51D25TÜ OL	at 4800 rpm	at 2200 rpm	1996–1998
M51D25TÜ OL	at 4600 rpm	at 2200 rpm	1998–2000
M51D25M1   	at 4400 rpm	at 2300 rpm     	1995-2001
Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle
:The SI figures here are "correct"; (id est these are the official 80/1269/EEC-compliant figures for all iterations of the M51 engine). Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 16:42, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Many thanks for checking this, I will update the article now. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:23, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Alas, these do not match the sources for these cars. The X25DT produces 130PS for instance.  Mr.choppers | ✎  03:18, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

text: Hi Johannes. Thanks for all this info. I have added these references to the article, and restored the table formatting to as per the above discussion. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:36, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: And as per BMW themselves, and the majority of all other sources, the output of the non-intercooled engine is 115PS/85kW. The X25DT produces 130PS/96kW according to Opel as well as Vauxhall, see page 57 here.  Mr.choppers | ✎  00:23, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horsepower units
Talk:Edwin Bidwell Wilson

message: Should this entry mention Wilson's service from 1954 to 1964 on the Scientific Advisory Board of the Tobacco Industrial Research Committee (renamed Council for Tobacco Research in 1964)?
Sources:
Edwin B. Wilson
C. C. Little
Tobacco Industry Research Committee
Joe Wiki (talk) 19:20, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nissan AD

message: I would like to know more about the Nissan Y12 4WD features and suspension system. I'm an avid user of Wikipedia. Muyawachira (talk) 06:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You will have to do research! When you find out, add it to the article - that's what we all do. Thanks,  Mr.choppers | ✎  18:59, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  4WD features
Talk:Fiat Doblò

message: There's also a version of the 1st-generation Doblo that uses a 1.3 Multijet with 85PS (62kW) - I have a 2009 model. This engine version is also not mentioned on the Multijet/JTD page so I've commented there. OK to add?
Nkh08 (talk) 13:23, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Its ok to add, would be good to have some source for that -->Typ932 T·C 17:56, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Fiat E-Doblò will be launched on 2023. Derwydd74 (talk) 04:58, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fiat E-Doblò
Talk:Citroën Elysée

message: Duplicated template and information, there are the article Citroën C-Elysée  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.183.97.193 (talk) 11:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second generation
Talk:Citroën Jumpy

message: Can whoever started this sentence please finish it?   I suggest "In the UK, Ireland, South Africa, and Australia, the van is badged as a Citroën Dispatch, because in these English-speaking markets "Jumpy" sounds very silly as a name for a delivery van".  But probably when the sentence was started the person who started it had a less frivolous subordinate clause in mind.   Or else, remove the subordinate clause?   And thank you.   Regards Charles01 (talk) 11:12, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops, I started deleting the line "because in these English-speaking markets "Jumpy" sounds very silly as a name for a delivery van", but left half of it there. It don't think this line is needed. Fixed now. OSX (talk • contributions) 12:46, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Appreciated.  I think that's what I'd have done if I hadn't been concerned about the risk of treading on unidentified toes.   Regards  Charles01 (talk) 17:37, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the UK, Ireland, South Africa, and Australia, the van is badged as a '''Citroën Dispatch''', because in these English-speaking markets. 

message: Since the model was pretty much completely redesigned in 2004, isn't the 2007> model a MK3 or third generation?
Thanks Jenova20 15:09, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The generation game 

message: The article may need an update – the 2019+ 1.995l 130kW SpaceTourer model sold in the UK (and perhaps elsewhere) features an 8-speed EAT8 automatic gearbox. — kashmīrī TALK 10:57, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different gearbox? 

message: I came to this page to help choose a van.  Questions I had in mind are: Does the van have a completely flat floor allowing me to walk from the driver's seat into the rear?, and to compare dimensions.   Articles on laptops etc contain tables with detailed specifications of each model and variant.   In contrast this article seems to lack a lot of useful information. Can this kind of information be added?  FreeFlow99 (talk) 11:11, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Features & Dimensions
Talk:Dacia Lăstun

message: This car is named (and badged) Dacia 500. Lăstun is just a nickname.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.116.115.89 (talk) 11:07, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lăstun? 