Talk:Fire Emblem: Mystery of the Emblem

message: I deleted the link to Moby Games since the site in question was a retailer and I find this highly inappropriate to Wikipedia. The link provided only a short synopsis and did nothing for the article's verifiability. Drumpler 04:42, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moby Games

message: PLOT tittle is there but no info,  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.192.10.50 (talk) 16:50, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There are three sub-headings for the plot: setting, characters and story. Aether7 (talk) 21:42, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: No PLOT... 

message: Here are some sources for future editors: Retroreview by RPGamer staff of the SNES version of the game; Staff review of the remake, again by RPGamer; Translation of remake's Famitsu review, from 1UP and archived on WebCite; Import review by Cubed3 of the DS remake; Japanese Iwata Asks concerning the DS remake and containing development information on the original, archived on WebCite; Partial transcript of Famitsu's review of the SNES original, along with correct issue in which it was published. A different link that leads to other sources is the game's Japanese Wikipedia page, has some cited information which can be used and read through Google Translate, but don't rely solely on it. --ProtoDrake (talk) 10:20, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fire Emblem: Mystery of the Emblem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6XK9tOtQO?url=http://www.1up.com/previews/fire-emblem-awakening-killing to http://www.1up.com/previews/fire-emblem-awakening-killing
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:16, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: An editor from Chinese Wikipedia is currently translating this article into Chinese, and I am helping with proofreading. I found a particular sentence potentially misleading and I am asking for clarification.
The sentence in question is "Victory is achieved when an enemy base is captured or all enemies are defeated" found in Gameplay section. There are two potential interpretations to it:
* Different stages have different objectives, for some stages, victory is achieved by capturing the enemy base, and for other stages, it is achieved by defeating all enemies.
* For every stage, the player can complete the level by either one of the two methods: capturing the enemy base, or defeating all enemies.
I am requesting for clarification to this sentence. Which one best describes the actual winning condition in this game? Best regards. --MilkyDefer (talk) 13:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That sentence is actually mistaken. Victory is achieved by seizing the enemy base only. Even if you defeat all the enemy units, the map does not end and victory is not achieved until the enemy base is captured. Cluesagi (talk) 03:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification Requested