lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:No. 29 Squadron RAF

message: The wording of the final para of the main section (beginning "When the squadron number...") seems a little cumbersome as it now comprises my original edit of the 28/30 Aug 2005 merged with the anon edits of the 26 July 2006, which I don't perceive as adding much information. However I'm hesitant to push my original wording if there's a perception that the anon addition adds something. Callum 18:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've done a bit of a re-write of this article - although the "history" is largely an amplification of the list of types used by the squadron. I've also rephrased the "markings tradition" a bit - and added a reference. Comments welcome of course, especially from present and former members of the squadron!! --Soundofmusicals (talk) 00:34, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Re-write" 

message: I can understand your last edit to this article. That glaring scarlet wasteland of aces' names is offensive to the eye. However, articles will be written for these aces (most likely by myself). Listing all the notable aces in squadron history supplies a link, and chases away the horrid "orphan" tag.
I have reverted your edit as part of my effort to keep the aviation wing of the wiki-orphanage unpopulated. Please do not be offended.
Georgejdorner (talk) 17:12, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a matter of me being offended. And while I agree that a lot of red ink is unsightly that is not the main point either. More a matter of notability - an air ace is not necessarily notable enough for a wiki article - in fact unless he has an exceptionally large "tally" (considering time and place) it is reasonable to expect him to have a real notability independent of his actual "acehood". Many WWI aces (both sides) went to the front pretty well straight from school, shot down their eight, nine or ten enemy aircraft, and were either killed before they had a chance to make any further impact on this world, or survived the conflict to lead postwar lives of more or less complete obscurity. They will never have a wiki article, any more than you or I will. I take your point about orphans, but on the other hand - when one adds a new article, even a stub, it is sensible to add wikilinks both ways at that time rather than rely on "red links" waiting in the ether to take up the slack. Never mind - not important enough to get heated about - I'll leave it up to you to either delete the "non-notable" names altogether, leave them there but remove the "link" brackets, or, if you really believe there is enough notability (and enough published information) to warrant an article in the future, leave them as they are. I suspect in the current red desert there may even be particular names in all three categories. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 00:18, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWI aces
Talk:Kushinagar

message: Could someone please add the predominant religions of Kushinagar, along with their percentage of the population? I suppose most would be Hindu... Thank you. Dawud (talk) 11:40, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Religion?

message: There are statements made in this section without any references. Where is this information to be found, about the Burmese monk for example??Shirazibustan (talk) 19:34, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  History and archaeology
Talk:Wajir

message: It is small school located about four kilometers to the east of Wajir town next to Wajir airport.
It was established on the 28th day of February 2007 with Khalif Maalim Abdi as the first student to be admitted. It all started as a boys' school but in 2010 due to the pressure from the community the girls were introduced citing good performance. Mr. Mohamed Sheikh Hassan the first head-teacher (2007- to date) has been credited for the immense work he has done to make Waberi one of the big schools in Wajir town.Some of the pioneer teachers are;Mr Mr Mudey as the first acting deputy head-teacher, Mr Ismail Hassan Kunow (HOD Humanities), Mr Mahamud Abdi (HOD Languages and Director of studies), Mr. Moi Charles (HOD Games and Mathematics), Mr Onyango Calvin Ondabu (HOD sciences) and Mr Abdi Mohamed Diriye (HOD Guidance and Counselling). 
The school is also known for its good sporting activities that it represented the entire North Eastern province in volley ball in the 2010 National games in Kisumu thanks to the team coach and physics teacher Mr Charles Moi.
In KCSE 2010 exams the school emerged as the best overall in Wajir county beating giants like Wajir High which had a Y, Furaha Mixed secondary school Wajir Girls, Sabulney seconadry etc  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.176.162.176 (talk) 13:04, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waberi Mixed Day secondary school
Talk:Our Lady of the Rosary of Chiquinquirá

message: Recently I made 20 or so edits of this article which was a soft hagiography with no references.  I abandoned my efforts to reform the article because it seemed to me to need a complete revision.  This I have been working on at my User page to which I now direct attention.  My draft is almost complete as regards the Colombian image, but I have made no attempt so far to re-write the account of the image at Maracaibo - possibly the article will need to be split into two.  For now, though, I merely direct the attention of other editors to my work and invite any comments to be made either here or at my talk page. Ridiculus mus (talk) 18:29, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write of article
Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nácek Ignácek

message: Pleae can somebody revert this page and close it, somebody is vandalising it, although archived, thanks, -jkb- 19:55, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pleae can somebody revert this page and close it, somebody is vandalising it 

message: A new batch of sockpuppets had appeared:
*  (username is attack)
* 
* 
* 
*  (offensive name in Czech lanuage)
This seems to be echo of a long war waged on Czech Wikipedia. Pavel Vozenilek 15:52, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  February 2007
Talk:History of Monopoly/Archive 1

message: *Support --JohnDBuell 14:45, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Keep the current title

message: I feel I should state my reasons of opposition to this. It's mostly an issue of ambiguity. There are those that find this the most simple title, but not specifying that the Parker Brothers board game is the subject I feel is asking for trouble (see above). Further, I have found in my research that authors on the subject of the game tend to use "monopoly" when writing about the "folk game" pre-Darrow and pre-Parker Brothers, and "Monopoly" when writing about the game Darrow produced and sold to PB. One could argue for splitting the current article in half on these grounds, but I feel a single comprehensive history article is still the best. For the record, PB/Hasbro officially treat the word in all caps as their trademark, though I'm not sure its use would be appropriate on Wikipedia. --JohnDBuell 14:45, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While I appreciate your opinion, I do want to state for the record that while no games were published under the name "Monopoly" until Darrow began publication, it is recorded that home-made versions of the game were called such things as "Antitrust" (Scott Nearing's name for the game), "Auction Monopoly" and "Monopoly." --JohnDBuell 20:38, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Change title to "History of Monopoly"

message: *Support.  Quoting WP:DAB:2. A disambiguating word or phrase can be added in parentheses. The word or phrase in parentheses should be:
::* the generic class that includes the topic (for example, Mercury (element), Seal (mammal)); or
::* the subject or context to which the topic applies (for example, Union (set theory), Inflation (economics)).
 Since Monopoly has also been recreated as a computer game, "board game" is not a good choice. siafu 15:52, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Change title to "History of Monopoly (game)"

message: *Support again a not great, but reasonable option. - Taxman Talk 15:29, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Change title to "History of Monopoly (board game)"

message: If you have another suggestion, please add it here.
Monopoly - History of the board game --Caligvla 16:21, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Change title to ...
Talk:Maultasche

message: LEO suggests "Swabian pockets" and "Swabian ravioli" as English expressions for the German word "Maultaschen". I'm not a native Englishspeaker, so I'm not sure about that, but if that's true, those two phrases maybe should redirect to Maultaschen, too. MondSemmel 19:10, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: nobody said anything about maw foo  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.227.144.208 (talk) 23:15, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

message: The correct English translation is Snout Bag. I found it on a menu of a German restaurant in Georgia, USA. 93.219.145.186 (talk) 04:41, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: * Sorry, you might want to refer to your German-English dictionary...Maul = mouth, muzzle, or maw. Not snout. Snout = Schnauze. I speak fluent German. --ColonelHenry (talk) 04:49, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Snout Bag
Talk:Fonthill Abbey

message: I've just been reading the article for the first time, knowing nothing about the subject. It's a good article but one thing which really struck me in the third paragraph is:
He hired James Wyatt as the leading architect, who can possibly be blamed for the building's failure due to his supposed lack of knowledge about vaulting and Gothic architecture in general.
That the building failed came as quite a surprise to me, a reader who isn't familiar with the building in question, since this seems like something which should be mentioned in the introduction. As it is, the reader must get all the way to the third paragraph to find out. Could some kind soul please fix this tiny niggle? I'd do it myself but I'm unfamiliar with the building in question so perhaps wouldn't do it justice. Thanks!--80.193.22.182 19:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article could use some editing 

message: Where exactly was this building located? Anyone know? It would be good to add the coordinates to the article. --208.65.188.23 (talk) 04:32, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Location?

message: Image:FonthillGallery.jpg, a colour lithograph of c. 1800, is about to be deleted. Anyone interested in preserving it for the encyclopedia? I'm not, though I uploaded it, in a moment of optimism.--Wetman (talk) 13:26, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. (But it's not a colour lithograph). Moonraker2 (talk) 02:29, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image:FonthillGallery.jpg 

message: Article is loaded with editorial commentary and factual claims lacking any citation, both suggestive of personal essay/original research. Jtcarpet (talk) 00:49, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-encyclopedic content 

message: There appear to be 2 different prices for the sale. The last but one paragraph states £330,000 and the last paragraph states £275,000.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lkingscott (talk • contribs) 21:26, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. There is obvious duplication there. The statement is needed only once. But without the source (J. Wilton Ely, "The genesis and evolution of Fonthill Abbey", Architectural History, 23 (1980:40–51)) it's not possible to say which of the two figures is correct. Perhaps someone who has access to that paper could check. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:40, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

text: I've now tried to remove the duplication, at least. The result is not very elegant. But the source will need to be checked, or a new source found, before the sale price can be resolved. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:54, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that the John Farquhar article links to this source, which gives £330,000. So I thunk it's safe to go with that figure. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sale price
Talk:Two Rooms: Celebrating the Songs of Elton John & Bernie Taupin

message: What about Kate Bush's version of Rocket Man?  Guettarda 19:17, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What about it?   Wasted Time R 19:21, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm - obviously I can't read :(  I just scanned the entire list of songs and didn't see it (I suppose I was looking for just "Rocket Man" and the longer name failed to trigger my search image.  Guettarda 19:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

message: How many of these tracks did EJ perform on - anybody know? Gwladys24 (talk) 22:02, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reg tinkling the ivories
Talk:Deal or No Deal Canada

message: Reminding, that this isn't the place to post your wishes to be a contestant, as well, don't post personal information such as your phone number, if we could somehow get a delete of that information that would help.
--WestJet 19:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: For: See the Dutch articles... --WestJet 18:29, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Splitting

message: i wish to participate in deal or no deal canada----does anybody guide me where to apply to participate  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.15.90.85 (talk) 18:19, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not where to discuss this type of thing. –xenotalk 18:23, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  how to participate in deal or no deal canada
Talk:Nick Fry

message: I removed "2006 is only his second full season as a team-manager. It took other team managers, such as Frank Williams many years to win a grand prix as manager."
This suggests Fry is responsible for a dramatic turnaround in the team's performance - their 2005 and 2006 performances have been widely acknowledged to have been poor to middling. the circumstances of the Hungarian GP were also exceptional. Mark83 19:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been reported in the Telegraph (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/motorsport/formulaone/5369856/Monaco-Grand-Prix-Jenson-Buttons-playboy-days-behind-him.html) that Nick Fry owns a proportion of the team, and in an earlier article, that he owns the majority stake. Shouldn't this be added?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.239.225.23 (talk) 23:17, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stockport air disaster

message: The BBC article states that the pilot was looking for a good place to put the aircraft down; he missed some park and instead put the aircraft down in an uninhabited area near Stockport city centre. The evidence does not justify this supposition whatsoever. For one thing, the AIB report states that the aircraft was likely uncontrollable after the engines cut out, and might not have been controllable even before then. The first officer died and the captain suffered retrograde amnesia, so we don't know what went on in the cockpit. There isn't the tiniest shred of evidence that the pilot "put the aircraft down" someplace safe. It was likely just coincidence - there are a lot of empty or disused areas around airports and under approach paths (and *that* is often deliberate).
This is such a common urban legend/media foofah. Every time a plane doesn't actually fall out of the sky, some media type comes up and says the pilot was "looking for a place to crash that wouldn't cause injuries on the ground". I don't blame the Wikipedian who put this in at all, because he/she likely didn't have any sources other than the BBC article. I am blaming the BBC for making a supposition not supported by the facts.
I suppose people want to think that in an emergency the first thing the pilot will do is look for a safe place to crash. It makes them feel less worried about an aircraft crashing into their home, school, or place of business. It ain't necessarily so, though; in fact it almost is never so. Aircraft about to crash are more often than not uncontrollable - that's why they crash. --Charlene 19:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Apologies. That would have been my factual faux pas. Thank you for correcting my blathering and making this article respectable. :) Legion 13:56, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

text: "From the evidence of two eyewitnesses who saw the aircraft just before the crash it was clear the pilot-in-command deliberately cut the power very shortly before impact and deliberately put the aircraft down on what was the only pocket handkerchief of relatively open space immediately before tall blocks of flats, the town hall, the police station, and Stockport Infirmary" - ICAO circular 107-AN/81 (AIB report, 1968)   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.53.255 (talk) 19:33, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: BBC News Report and the pilot "looking for a good place to crash"
Talk:Religion in Mexico

message: According to the new 2020 census, Mexico is less catholic (77%) and more protestant (11.2%) or irreligious (8.1%). Here below you will find some sources in Spanish and English about this: 
- https://www.elfinanciero.com.mx/nacional/soy-ateo-gracias-a-dios-aumentan-las-personas-sin-religion-en-mexico
- https://www.milenio.com/politica/comunidad/catolicismo-pierde-creyentes-censo-inegi-2021
- https://www.theyucatantimes.com/2021/01/religion-in-mexico-declining-inegi/
Therefore, this article should be updated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aleqc (talk • contribs) 02:20, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  New 2020 census results have been published 

message: Correct   "belivers"   to   "believers".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.5.168.63 (talk) 16:57, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Believers 

message: Change "the near totality of which (around 95%) live" to "roughly 95% of whom live" Lemurfoot (talk) 11:28, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: . Aidan9382 (talk) 13:54, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 July 2022 

message: Hello,
I just wanted to suggest a small change to this page. It uses the Federal District on the table with the demographic information on religion. The Federal District name to refer to Mexico City has been dropped for many years now, and just using Mexico City as the state name would be more accurate and informative.
If anyone with access to the page would change it, that would be great! Alejandronanga (talk) 17:32, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Lightoil (talk) 02:06, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 September 2023 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ashleeyy (talk) 10:46, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Honors World Religions
Talk:Ronnie Dio and the Prophets

message: Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages says that if a page is short and connot be expanded, it makes sense to merge it with another article. Seems to me that there is so little info on all of these short-lived bands (The Vegas Kings, The Rumblers, etc.) that they should all be merged into one- (I am suggesting Ronnie Dio and the Prophets, the last of them). After all, the only reason these pages exist is to follow Dio's career, and a good deal of that information is already on his page. --Rosencrantz1 19:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:John R. Ragazzini

message: I just found one short biography dating back to 1947 in Proceedings of I.R.E see 
I quote it here:
John R. Ragazzini was born in 1912 and received the degrees of B.S. and E.E. at the City College of New York in 1932 and 1933. He then received the degrees of A.M. and Ph.D. at Columbia University in 1939 and 1941. After a brief association with one of the City Departments he became an instructor in the School of Technology at the City College, -and in 1941 joined the faculty of the School of Engineering of Columbia University. During the war he was in charge of two contracts with the Office of Sciqntific Research and Development, one of which involved electronic simulators and computers. He is a member of Phi Beta Kappa, Sigma Xi, and Tau Beta Pi, and is an associate member of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers.
This might be helpful for later edits.
--Pouya 19:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: His biography
Talk:List of bean-to-bar chocolate manufacturers

message: Please add the following information to this table, which could enhance the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the overall article: 
Company	Location	Year founded	Products	Notes
Luker Chocolate LukerChocolate (talk) 17:14, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Duplicate edit request, see below. Liu1126 (talk) 17:45, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 November 2023 

message: Please add the following information which could enhance the accuracy and completness of the overal artcile. 
Company 	       Location	             Year founded             Products	             Notes
Luker Chocolate   Colombia     1906         Single Origin, Better-for-you confectionery and chocolate manufacturing services. 
https://www.confectionerynews.com/Article/2021/01/08/From-premium-to-vegan-why-Luker-Chocolate-is-made-for-the-plant-based-trend-LISTEN LukerChocolate (talk) 17:38, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Please establish the notability of the company with multiple independent reliable sources. You are also advised to write the article first. Liu1126 (talk) 17:46, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 November 2023
Talk:Colisée de Québec

message: The article's history is not entirely clear; mention is made of a prior structure on the same site (by the same name?) but only the current building's history is outlined. However, despite the current building being opened in 1950, this site is noted as the home of the Quebec Bulldogs from 1910-1920. If anyone can expand on this, please feel free. Duncan1800 (talk) 04:38, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Inconsistency

message: There seems to be some inconsistency in the first sentence of the article.  It says "Colisée Pepsi (English: Pepsi Coliseum), formerly the Colisée de Québec (English: The Quebec Coliseum)...".  However, this is the English Wikipedia.  Thus, if the names, in English, really are/were "X Coliseum", then the name of this article should be "Pepsi Coliseum".  Alternately, if it's called "Colisée Pepsi" in English (we use all sorts of foreign-origin names in English - we don't call the Autobahn "the Car Road"), then the first sentence should not say (English: ) - because its name, in English, should be the title of the article already! Looking at the English version of their own website (http://www.expocite.com/www/colisee-pepsi.php), it appears that they call it the "Pepsi Coliseum" when they're speaking English.  That's a strong argument, but there may be other, more important sources.  If it turns out that "Pepsi Coliseum" is far more prevalent in English, then we should change the title of the article.  I'll do that in a few days if no one replies to this, or if there are only messages of support.  Otherwise, let's talk about it.  Cheers, AshleyMorton (talk) 02:29, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Title / Language

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure)  BegbertBiggs (talk) 01:09, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Colisée Pepsi →  – With the site abandoned and soon to be demolished, there's no longer any reason to keep this at the sponsor name over the common non-sponsor name. See also Talk:Astrodome#Direct RM, a similar case from six years ago. Alternatively, this can be moved to , the English form of the name. O.N.R. (talk) 09:15, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 October 2020