Talk:Hot-bulb engine

message: The article says: "he last large-scale manufacturer of hot bulb engines stopped producing them in the 1950s and they are now virtually extinct in commercial use, except in very remote areas of the developing world." but it doesn't say WHO that manufacturer was, or how we know they still exist in the remote areas.   I think this sentence needs a footnote.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimindc (talk • contribs) 02:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: The last manufacturer, who was it?

message: what is the difference between a hot bulb type and an oilfield type.
Viscosity of fuel, gaseous vs tar?  manifolds?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.76.183 (talk) 18:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Types

message: ""and even in some cases coal dust were used in hot-bulb engines. ""
Any references???Wdl24.146.23.84 (talk) 23:28, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Coal

message: Historically this engine is very important . 
See diesel engines quote:
:"""Early fuel injection systems
:The modern diesel engine is a combination of two inventors' creations. In all major aspects, it holds true to Rudolf Diesel's original design, that of igniting fuel by compression at an extremely high pressure within the cylinder. With much higher pressures and high technology injectors present-day diesel engines use the so-called solid injection system invented by Herbert Akroyd Stuart for his hot bulb engine."
:Ignoring the obvious differences the modern Glow Plug indirect injection engine could be considered the latest reincarnation of these "hot bulb" ignition based engines.<[2]>.
:Solid injection raises the fuel to extreme pressures by mechanical pumps and delivers it to the combustion chamber by pressure-activated injectors. With direct injected diesels, injectors spray fuel through six or more small orifices in its nozzle .Diesel's original engine injected fuel with the assistance of compressed air, which atomized the fuel and forced it into the engine through a nozzle (a similar principle to an aerosol spray). This is called an air-blast injection."""
Wdl24.146.23.84 (talk) 23:53, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: importance

message: * moved from User talk:Sladen#hot bulb
the references in the artile contain all the proof you need but you must read them all .
just to quote each other with the wrong info  does not work. 
also to go to school or university my teach you to use references pictures and drawings rather than a wrong second hand description.
thinking before deleting or contacting the originator may help.Wdl1961 (talk) 15:12, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello Wdl1961, thank you for your contributions to the Hot bulb engine article.  If you know that an existing reference covers a second part of the article, you can use  (note the closing '/' slash).  This will then match it up to a pre-existing reference of the same name.  It is crucial that Wikipedia remains verifiable (see WP:VERIFY), as such the best way to answer the addition of a  link is by matching it up to a reference;  either from searching the web, or pointing to an existing reference.  Once again, thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!  —Sladen (talk) 15:20, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Hello again Wdl1961, I'm finding it a little hard to follow what you're referring to.  Could you perhaps try using an alternative wording to help me understand what you mean by "toystore items".  —Sladen (talk) 04:16, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

text: I'm having difficulty following what you are attempting to describe, or the question you might be asking.  If you want to refer to a particular revision, or change, you can click the History tab, then select a particular revision (for example, like this or this) and paste that URL into the Talk page.  —Sladen (talk) 11:17, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  hot bulb references  

message: - Direct injected small diesel engines still were not practical and the prechambered indirect injected engine was invented needing glowplugs for starting. ref>Harry Ricardo, British motor engineer who established Ricardo Consulting Engineers </ref""
preceding copy of history.>Harry Ricardo art has ref info in it.
Wdl1961 (talk) 03:59, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm having difficulty following what you are attempting to describe, or the question you might be asking.  If you want to refer to a particular revision, or change, you can click the History tab, then select a particular revision (for example, like this or this) and paste that URL into the Talk page.  —Sladen (talk) 11:17, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1910/1950s

message: fotograph refs and drawings from multiple sources are not more reliable than third parties quotes and opinions under wiki rules ??Wdl1961 (talk) 02:20, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Wikipedia policy on what is admissible is WP:VERIFY.  —Sladen (talk) 11:19, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  fotograph ref

message: Wdl1961 (talk) 03:21, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, I'm having difficulty following what question you are asking;  could you perhaps try phrasing it in a different way?   —Sladen (talk) 11:20, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: the references in the artile contain all the proof you need but you must read them all . just to quote each other with the wrong info does not work. ::also to go to school or university my teach you to use references pictures and drawings rather than a wrong second hand description. thinking before deleting or contacting the originator may help.Wdl1961 (talk) 15:12, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Wdl1961 (talk) 14:12, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm still lost.  What point are you trying to make?  I and other editors have previously deleted unsuitable material that does not meet the policies of WP:OR and WP:VERIFY.  —Sladen (talk) 14:24, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

text: I'm sorry, I'm completely lost as to what you're asking about.  You've quoted some material, but not stated a question, or issue you'd like to raise about it.  (Perhaps you could try rewording your question/answer/point/query so that it contains one or more verbs, as I'm having difficult following.  Many Thanks, —Sladen (talk) 03:46, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Wdl1961: you appear to be randomly copying and pasting and without apparent purpose.  Could you please either clear it up, or revert yourself and ask for assistance in doing whatever it is that you're trying to do.  —Sladen (talk) 05:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: the references in the artile contain all the proof you need but you must read them all . just to quote each other with the wrong info does not work. ::also to go to school or university my teach you to use references pictures and drawings rather than a wrong second hand description. thinking before deleting or contacting the originator may help.Wdl1961 (talk) 15:12, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Wdl1961: Please do not add other editors' signatures to things they have not written.  Thank you.  —Sladen (talk) 16:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Wdl1961: What is the question?  —Sladen (talk) 17:39, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  British English?

message: The diesel engine needs the maximum heat for starting from cold after that a lower compression could be used but there is no really practical way of reducing the compression. The hot bulb engine was supplied  with the initial starting heat and would then run satisfactorily on the lower compression.
The last generation of hot bulb engines were quite sophisticated. Bolinders last series of hot bulb engines used internal hot plugs rather than the better known external. Conversion kits were also offered where the initial starting heat was supplied by an electric heating plug. After starting the electrical power was turned off and the internal heating plug then functioned as the internal heating surface.
Electric heating plugs were also fitted in some commercial diesel engines as an aid to starting.AT Kunene (talk) 14:37, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  other details. 

message: At the height of the steam age Otto finally managed to deduce an internal combustion heat cycle. For a short period of time there were kits produced to convert a steam engine into an internal combustion engine allowing allowing the boiler to be scrapped. These were known as "half breed"
engines.
As a steam engine didn't usually have a closed crankcase most of the conversions were valved two strokes and used a hot bulb system of ignition.AT Kunene (talk) 12:53, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Half Breed engines 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hot-bulb engine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?IA=GB1996000847&DISPLAY=DESC
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071031150105/http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=418121314557067951 to http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=418121314557067951
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have removed the "Compression ignition" section, because, frankly speaking, it was nothing but utter rubbish. One of the hot-bulb engine's key characteristics is that it does not have compression ignition. The text implied that the "[compression ignition] system was patented in October 1890". Akroyd had two British patents, 7146 (8 May 1890), and 15994 (8 October 1890). Regarding injection timing, the former remains vague: "…at the desired part of this compression stroke, the supply of liquid hydrocarbon is forced, in a spray form, on to the heated vaporiser, which almost instantly changes it into a gas…" – so basically, all we get is "at the desired part of this compression stroke", which means that the fuel is injected somewhere during the compression stroke. The patent does not say that the fuel is injected "only when the piston reaches top dead centre", as the article read. The later patent reads: "The chief object of our present invention is to provide means, whereby the necessary quantities of combustible vapour or gas and of air may be drawn in during the suction or outstroke of the piston, notwithstanding that a permanent igniter is employed…" This is also a vague description of the injection timing, but it definitely contradicts "injection at top dead centre", it literally says "suction or outstroke of the piston". It also describes that the igition system works by employing a "permanent igniter", which is not how compression ignition works.
After some book-diving, I found a pretty devastating statement: „Die These (…), der Akroyd-Motor habe bereits die Verdichtungszündung an Stelle der Funkenzündung angewendet, ist nicht haltbar“ (The theory that the Akroyd engine used compression ignition instead of spark-ignition, is not tenable) (F. Sass, Geschichte de Deutschen Verbrennungsmotorenbaues von 1860 bis 1918, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg 1962, ISBN 978-3-662-11843-6, p. 421). The US patent 845140 (was also mentioned in the section) does exist, it was granted, and the patent holder is Herbert Akroyd Stuart. The problem however is that the patent does not describe a compression ignition engine. The drawings make it immediately obvious; for a compression ignition engnine, the combustion chamber surface is way too large.
The claim that Akroyd Stuart developed a hot-bulb engines with a compression ratio of 18 : 1 and compression ignition, needed a citation for a reason – it was nothing but original research and falsification of history. Mixing figment with fact doesn't render the figment fact. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:18, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of compression ignition section