lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Solubility pump

message: This statement in the article should be clarified. "Since deep water (that is, seawater in the ocean's interior) is formed under the same surface conditions that promote carbon dioxide solubility, it contains a higher concentration of dissolved inorganic carbon than one might otherwise expect." Additional information is needed to explain why this is true.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.236.254.17 (talk) 23:39, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Some questions which the article might answer to give some sense of the size of the system and its time constants:
* If the C02 level in the atmosphere stabilized at current levels, how long would it take for the ocean to reach equilliubrium?
* If the atmosphere were 100% carbon dioxide, how much would be able to dissolve in the amount of water that's in the ocean?  (Disregarding biological side-effects.)
* Why is two-thirds of the CO2 added to the atmosphere not being absorbed by the ocean?  Is it being emitted too quickly for the ocean to keep up?  Is the limiting factor the surface area of the ocean and the speed of this circulation?
* How quickly does C02 diffuse through the ocean in the absence of circulation?
-- Beland 21:01, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Scale of the system

message: The graph included in the article (g gas per liter of water, as a function of temperature) is probably more misleading than helpful. It assumes pure CO2 at a pressure of 1 atm; which is about 2500 times more than the partial pressure of CO2 in the atmosphere. Therefor the real amount of CO2 in sea water will be 1/2500 of the values displayed. Also, the gas solubility graphs on engineeringbox.com are rather crude, and the data doesn't seem reliable. Prevalence  03:53, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solubility graph
Talk:Berthold Schwarz

message: I knew someone who's maiden name was "Schleter" she claimed originally spelt by ancestors in Germany as "Schleiter", and that it meant "shooter". There was a family tradition that they were descended from someone who invented one of the first European firearms. Well, just family folktales most likely, but I'd be interested in at least the etymology of Schleiter, it doesn't seem to be a very common German surname, it does have a rather late onomatopœic quality to it and maybe it is tied into some early arquebus or musketeering type tradesman. 67.5.156.187 (talk) 07:37, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legend of patrilinage. 

message: According to historiography in the first sources Berthold Schwarz is mentioned as a Greek.
"Kohler also quotes from a manuscript (no.67(148)) in the ambrasser collection written about 1410
Es war ein meister von Kriechenland
Niger Bertholdus ist er genannt
i.g. "a Greek master called Berthold Niger."...It is intresting that in the oldest German accounts, Berthold is a Greek. In the feuerwerkbuch, printed in 1529, it is said "the art of shooting" from a buchse" was invented by "Magister Niger Bertholdus" who was a Greek alchemist and "Nigromanticus" i.g. and adept of black arts...The oldest mention, if it were authentic, would be in the records for Naumburg ander Saale, which say that ignis Graecus, which is gunpowder was made in 1348 by Berthold Schwartz "aus Kriechenland"."
A history of Greek fire and gunpowder by J.R. Partington pg 92
--Kentarchos (talk) 16:44, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  German or Greek??
Talk:Tympanum (architecture)

message: --Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 10:59, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Norman example

message: The article says the tympanum was invented in Egypt between 300 and 250 BC, which would make it Ptolemeic.
Ptolemeic architecture was just Greek architecture brought to Egypt, so precedents will be easily found in Greece.
The Parthenon, to cite but one example, has a decorated tympanum, a feature which would seem to follow practically automatically once the shape of the roof was determined.  The Parthenon was begun c.447 BC.
I suggest that the claim for "invention" in Egypt should be corrected.
As an aside, I find the reference to "ancient" Egypt misleading in and of itself.  To me, that is synonymous with Pharaonic Egypt, but does not include the Ptolemies, who were part of the Classical period, but this is not central to the question.
Terry J. Carter (talk) 17:29, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed as suggested. What you say makes sense.  Regards, —mattisse (Talk) 18:09, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ptolemeic invention? 

message: in our gallery really good ones?  Do the Pantheon & Parthenon really have tympana?  I say "NO" but am looking for another opinion before slashing and burning.  Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 14:05, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  are the first two examples 

message: I removed this statement:  "Bands of molding surrounding the tympanum are referred to as the archivolt."  That source actually says an archivolt stands "surrounding an arched opening", not necessarily a tympanum.  Here's one of many such examples with no tympanum].  --Lockley (talk) 06:58, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh? That doesn't mean that when there is a typanum, it isn't an archivolt! Please don't use an edit summary saying "remove unreferenced" when a reference is given. I will reert you. Johnbod (talk) 14:55, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi .  I'm confused.  The fact does not appear in the cited source.  It provides a definition that does not mention tympana at all.  Are you contending that every tympanum has an archivolt?  Then please look at the three Asian examples in the gallery, or consider Vitruvius's use of the word tympanum in the context of pediment sculptures, or consider the Yale Union Laundry Building in Portland Oregon.  No archivolts anywhere near any of those.  --Lockley (talk) 16:49, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  tympani and archivolts
Talk:James Alfred Wanklyn

message: I have created an article on James Alfred Wanklyn, a rather colorful 19th-century scientific figure.  Feel free to add more material.  The references listed provide some biographical material that could be  helpful.  Also, figures from Wanklyn's books might be useful. - Astrochemist 21:25, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Category-Class novel articles

message: Checking the date a novel was published or its author's name or the language in which it was written is so basic that no documentation would appear to be required.  But once categorization of novels strays into less obvious territory, won't it be highly contentious?
Eyeballing all the current categories on the list, I see very few that relate to "themes".  "Novels dealing with slavery" seems a rather easy-to-define category.  Either slavery is portrayed in the novel or it is not.  
But who is to say whether a particular novel has a particular "theme"?  
Therefore, I nominate such categories as "Novels with a theme of wife-abuse" for speedy deletion.  
Otherwise, won't we be bogged down in endless discussions of whether John's slapping Mary on p. 23 supports the assertion that the novel has a "theme wife abuse"?  Maybe he just lost his temper and slapping her is quite unrelated to her relationship as his wife?  SocJan 21:31, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Themes" may be an inappropriate way to categorize novels
Talk:Coup de Grâce (Mink DeVille album)

message: Singles from this LP were: "You Better Move On" b/w "She Was Made in Heaven" (Atlantic 3864) and "Maybe Tomorrow" b/w "So In Love Are We" (Atlantic 3880) ([http://www.spectropop.com/JackNitzsche/discography.htm Nitzsche discography) Griot (talk) 19:21, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Singles
Talk:Rocky Mountain capshell

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Whpq (talk) 17:51, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:T (magazine)

message: T is published 13 times a year covering women’s fashion, men’s fashion, Travel, Design, Culture and Holiday. (Please note the current page incorrectly states that T is published 15 times a year.)
Citation: http://investors.nytco.com/press/press-releases/press-release-details/2012/Redesigned-T-Magazine-Franchise-to-Launch-in-2013/default.aspx
Brendan Monaghan was named the first publisher of T in October 2013.
Citation: http://investors.nytco.com/press/press-releases/press-release-details/2013/The-New-York-Times-Names-Two-New-Vice-Presidents-of-Advertising/default.aspx
170.149.100.10 (talk) 15:39, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Acroloxus

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Whpq (talk) 13:52, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Renate Stendhal

message: at the least it needs cleaning up as it sounds more like a review or ad than an article.  There are no 3rd party references given.  I would respectfully disgree with removing speedy delete tag.  Pharmboy 21:42, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We do not need the domain name listed multiple times within the article.  I have reverted, twice, and fixed the book names (which already indicate source).  Please do not continue to flood the article with links to the main domain.   Pharmboy (talk) 20:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spamming
Talk:Charles Lemert

message: I am completing the updates to the Charles Lemert wiki, please do not delete just yet. Thank you. It will be a full page with context. Thanks
Samhan.samhan 21:44, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: was an amazing work of Lemert's. This page fails to mention it. I would like to request that that be changed.
Inagoddesseye 02:19, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tally's Corner 

message: This article is full of blurb language ("helped to set in stone his reputation as the leading sociological interpreter of French theory") and bad academic writing ("to offer a radical different intellectual trajectory"). Please curb your enthusiasm. Wikipedia is meant to be an encyclopedia, not a praise singers contest. --Ankimai (talk) 09:28, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fan site 
Talk:Pataria

message: Patarine and Pataria cover the same subject. I don’t have any clear view on what the merged article should be called, though I incline towards Paterines. —Ian Spackman 21:49, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe I'm biassed, but I favour "Pataria", the name of the movement over the name of the individuals of the movement (which also varies in spelling). Srnec 03:19, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal

message: It is not that unclear, at least, Encyclopedia.com claims Pataria was the name of a quarter of Milan, and Vilfrido Pareto claimed it was a poor quarter. This makes perfect sense, that poor people would start a movement against corruption and greed, and their opponents would dub them the equivalent of "slum-dwellers".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.67.226.33 (talk) 11:29, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Elktoe

message: — Assignment last updated by Sdcasey19 (talk) 14:46, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Invertebrate Zoology
Talk:Ramsay, Calgary

message: A woman was found dead in Ramsay at 5 a.m. on August 5, 2007. A passerby noticed the body of the partially clothed woman, believed to be in her 20s, laying partly on a lawn and a sidewalk at the intersection of Burns Avenue and Alexander Street S.E.
Police said she cried out for help as she suffered a vicious sexual assault. Preliminary investigation suggests her screams for assistance were heard, but not relayed to police.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.107.122.237 (talk • contribs) 15:08, August 6, 2007
:What is the relevance of this statement, and why should this be added to the article? Is there a source for this statement? If not, this senteneces have no place whatsoever on the Ramsay page. --Qyd 13:01, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Crime
Talk:Amastra micans

message: — Assignment last updated by Anuinhawaii (talk) 07:36, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Zoology

message: — Assignment last updated by Anuinhawaii (talk) 19:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Zoology - Waipahu
Talk:Amastra spirizona

message: — Assignment last updated by Anuinhawaii (talk) 06:26, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Zoology

message: — Assignment last updated by Anuinhawaii (talk) 19:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Zoology - Waipahu
Talk:Amastra subsoror

message: I came to this article from the random article portal, and chose to delve into it as an exercise to see what I could do to improve it, given that it has extremely little internet presence and has probably never had human eyes devoted to it for any significant period of time in recent memory. Result: I was able to improve some things, but not much, and pretty much nothing that could have been done by a bot or even semi-automated. So it looks like we're doing alright collecting info. - Sdkb (talk) 21:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Now slightly better? 

message: If a gallon of Tuscan milk can have thousands of customer reviews on Amazon, I don't see why we can't have hundreds of comments at Talk:Amastra subsoror.  Could happen. Just sayin'. Mathglot (talk) 18:12, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree wholeheartedly. jp×g 02:29, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

text: The snail may have gone extinct, but that doesn't mean its talk page will! jlwoodwa (talk) 06:31, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Going viral?
Talk:Rosalia Kaufman

message: Rosalia Kaufman is not only a painters wife, but a pianist who influenced her son Boris Pasternak with her music to the extent that as a young boy he turned to music which was to become his first inclination. Under the tutelage of Aleksandr Scriabin, he began to study musical composition at the age of 13. His poems are musicaly expresive and very lirical.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.69.216.45 (talk • contribs) 
:Without some good sources it is difficult to see what cannot be said already in Boris Pasternak or how to write a verifiable separate article about her. For the moment I'll remove the PROD tag by redirecting to Leonid Pasternak which has mostly the same content and her picture, with no prejudice against creating a well sourced article. --Tikiwont 14:54, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Amphidromus

message: In the "Shell description" section, the caption of the first image currently says: "Abapertural and apertural view of the shell of Amphidromus perversus". However that makes it sound as if they are two views of one shell. In fact the abapertural view is of a left-handed shell, and the apertural view is of a right-handed shell. This should be made clear in the caption. Invertzoo (talk) 13:20, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I modified the caption. Invertzoo (talk) 22:57, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks =D!--Daniel Cavallari (talk) 10:39, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  About a caption 

message: Where it says "one to three inches in maximum dimension" in the intro, the size needs to be expressed in mm as well as in inches. Invertzoo (talk) 22:11, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Done =) --Daniel Cavallari (talk) 10:39, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units of measurement 

message: Overview of the reproductive system.
Subgenus Amphidromus:
		
Subgenus Syndromus:
			
		
--Snek01 (talk) 12:39, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd rather remove the drawings, and keep the actual photograph. There are too many figures already, and some of them need detailed captions explaining the abbreviations. --Daniel Cavallari (talk) 16:46, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images of the reproductive system
Talk:Barkdust

message: There should be a separate wikipedia article about the history of the unit of measurement of "units". It's a very off name for a unit of measurement and some whack job must have established said unit and there should be a wikipedia page on it..  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.76.47.120 (talk) 07:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unit 
Talk:Injection molding machine

message: Can someone more knowledgeable look through this edit that I just reverted and use it to expand the article?  Due to the formatting, it looks like it could be a copyright violation, but google turns up nothing, so it may not be. --GargoyleMT 22:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Integrating edit 

message: Moved discussion to injection molding because the template links there. Wizard191 (talk) 21:39, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Injection molding]]
Talk:The Ninja (novel)

message: "The ninja are introduced not as magical or almost mythical people, but rather as supreme martial artists who have reached the highest level and seek to progress further. It is suggested that by becoming ninja they strive to advance to an even higher plane, gaining skills such as haragei, or sensing the surrounding world in a different manner." - The sentences highly contradict each other, unless the author thinks becoming a supernatural being or having superpowers are not 'magical' or 'mystical' aspects...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.157.155.247 (talk) 09:01, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not magical or mystical
Talk:Neural cryptography

message: Sorry, but I removed the part "Security against quantum computers".  It seems to me that this is a very important fact to let it in the article without proper references.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Faturita (talk • contribs) 05:36, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I restored it, and added a reference. Alas, my reference says that the original algorithm is not secure. --68.0.124.33 (talk) 20:25, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Antrorbis breweri

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks 12:32, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Antrorbis →  – Genus is no longer monotypic, as there is now A. tennesseensis (Perez, Shoobs, Gladstone, & Niemiller, 2019). This page is better as a species page (with minor amendments). But the page can't be Moved as there is already a (redirect) page of that name Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins (talk) 09:07, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 June 2023
Talk:Aphaostracon

message: Hello! I am new to the world of Wikipedia. I was just curious if there were any known reasons as to why this genus of freshwater snail is only found in very particular places in Florida? Does it have something to do with specific favorable environmental conditions or perhaps low opportunities for genetic exchange? Vertebrates.for.Invertebrates (talk) 07:47, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't recall seeing any sources that address those issues for Aphaostracon, but the article for Floridobia, another genus of very small snails with most species endemic to a single spring in Florida, does discuss the very limited environmental niche in which they are found. As most of the species are limited to small, widely scattered locations, genetic isolation probably does play a role in the observed speciation. Donald Albury 16:57, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Endemic Species
Talk:Advanced Civilization

message: I propose this page be renamed "Advanced Civilization (board game)" CapnZapp (talk) 05:56, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? Generally, a disambiguous phrase is only used where there is a naming conflict. I could see it, perhaps, as a confusion reducer if there an article entitled Advanced civilization (and as you can see, there isn't currently), but even then there'd be no actual need for it. --Rindis (talk) 15:56, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: To differentiate Avalon Hill's Advanced Civilization from Avalon Hill's Avalon Hill's Advanced Civilization. --Traal (talk) 20:11, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  rename
Talk:Dragon Rally

message: "The 23 November 1961 issue of The Motorcycle carried an article by George Wilson in which he asked, "Can such a dream be realised in this country - a rally for super enthusiasts only, and so organised that by its very nature, only super enthusiasts would want to join in?... But above all it must be held in the dead of winter when only men who are men would be interested and the softies would stay away""
Can anyone provide a proper citation for this article? Nasier Alcofribas (talk) 22:35, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: First article in ''Motor Cycle''

message: I do not believe that this link is contrary to the spirit of wikipedia - the club is a not-for-profit organisation of volunteers that runs the rally. If you do not share this opinion, do please discuss. Nasier Alcofribas (talk) 22:48, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Conwy Club link

message: The cartoon dragon, which appears on the first page, both in sketch form and in colour, was created by Bill Thacker for the weekly magazine "The Motor Cycle" where he was their regular cartoonist. I feel he should be acknowwledged somehow.
Source: The Motor Cycle 92.14.87.19 (talk) 19:45, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Dragon symbol
Talk:Auriculella ambusta

message: — Assignment last updated by Anuinhawaii (talk) 00:46, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Zoology
Talk:Auriculella

message: Other images of unidentified Auriculella:
* http://www.hear.org/starr/hiplants/images/600max/html/starr_050713_7148_freycinetia_arborea.htm
* http://www.hear.org/starr/hiplants/images/600max/html/starr_050713_7152_fraxinus_uhdei.htm --Snek01 (talk) 22:00, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  images
Talk:Auriculella perpusilla

message: — Assignment last updated by Anuinhawaii (talk) 19:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Zoology - Waipahu