lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ancient UNIX

message: To the well-meaning person who redirected the V5 link to UNIX System V: Unix versioning is rather complicated, and differs radically based on what part of the family tree you're talking about. Fifth Edition is actually a Research Unix and predates the earliest versions of SysV by over a decade; as far as I know it was never released commercially, and operated at only about 50 sites. (Frankly, the only freely available SysV version, OpenSolaris, would probably plow a GBA into the ground and bury it. V5 is far more lightweight.) Haikupoet (talk) 04:12, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: V5 vs SysV

message: I made an edit to change a piped link to not go to compatibility layer, but instead go to emulator. I think it's just important that people know the difference between these two things. An emulator recreates the hardware to be emulated in software, and some examples are SIMH and QEMU and AppleWin and MAME and VisualBoyAdvance. However, a compatibility layer is a different thing entirely. It does not emulate hardware, it just changes system calls from one format to another. E.g. one example, Wine translates calls to the Windows API into native Linux calls, and the FreeBSD OS has a compatibility layer for older GNU/Linux applications which translates Linux calls into calls for the FreeBSD kernel (often simply called kFreeBSD). This Talk: Page edit may be directly in violation of Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines, and if it is, I'm sorry, but I'm trying better to be bold, and I think that knowing this (and that Wikipedia has articles on both things) is important not only to the well-being of this article, but, like, a zillion other ones.
--Cogburnd02 (talk) 20:31, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compatibility layer vs. Emulator 

message: Thanks, 19:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Please add years in which versions came out
Talk:Bharatiya Jnanpith

message: The content of this article and this article is little confusing.Can anyone plz clarify on this?--Anoopan (talk) 04:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Lucas v. Earl

message: Before creation of the married filing status by Congress, the splitting of spouses incomes depended on whether the taxpayer lived in a community property state as in Poe v. Seaborn or lived in a common law state as in the case here.
It would be much better if both cases are discussed in on article and search in wikipedia for either case would link or lead to the combined article.  A proposed title may be income splitting in US income tax before the married filing status and each case could get a section.  Sound good or not? Lingust (talk) 21:01, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: They're both leading cases; I would say each should be maintained in its own separate article. Famspear (talk) 15:28, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge of the two marriage income tax cases
Talk:Kaan

message: I was thinking of starting a page for the rapper K.A.A.N. His following is becoming rather large with his most recent album, and he's being featured on outlets like Genius and NPR.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmehtany (talk • contribs) 03:15, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  K.A.A.N page
Talk:Jand, Chakwal

message: Postal code of jand Awan? 119.160.69.86 (talk) 10:32, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Postal code?
Talk:Daniela Farinacci

message: This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot.  I have performed a web search with the contents of :Daniella Farinacci, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://imdb.com/name/nm0267475/filmotype.  For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have done a major rewrite of the article. Some of the credits that I listed, also appear in imdb, so I assume that's where the similarity was found. Hopefully this rewrite provides enough different information to prevent the deletion of the actor's credits. J Bar (talk) 04:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Daniella Farinacci]]
Talk:Ryan serhant

message: I've removed the speedy deletion tag that cited spam as its reason.  I dislike spam as much as the next editor, perhaps more so, but I'm finding it impossible to assign this article as spam.  The subject has won a reality show competition and has an acting role on a national-level television programme; the guidelines about reality show competitions would indicate that this is sufficient notability.  If the nominator/anyone else has a compelling reason to suggest differently, I'd appreciate being notified; at the least, this might go to AfD instead of speedy deletion. Accounting4Taste:talk 04:34, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Official (tennis)

message: After looking at corresponding articles in other sports, it appears that for the sake of standardization it may be appropriate to move this article to "Official (Tennis)"  Please comment.--Greenguy1090 (talk) 02:48, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: --Greenguy1090 (talk) 03:54, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Move
Talk:With You (Chris Brown song)

message: This page has asserted validity and should not be deleted. Information and references are given. As more information is given it will be included into the page.71.247.6.211 (talk) 04:57, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I had to remove the content that you "lifted" from here.  I'm not convinced what's left asserts notability under WP:MUSIC.  Which specific criteria do you think this article meets?  --Yamla (talk) 17:30, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Who's the guy that says "Black and beats vibe baby" (or something like that) throughout the song? Genevieve-Tamerlaine (talk) 00:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: LOL, see that's why you shouldn't download illegally on the internet. Buy his album! That's a bootlegged copy. TeePee-20.7 (talk) 03:40, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Surface diffusion

message: This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write.  This is how the article, as of December 5, 2007, compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?: Yes, but the lead should be longer. Please, add the second paragraph.
:2. Factually accurate?: Yes
:3. Broad in coverage?: Yes
:4. Neutral point of view?: No problem
:5. Article stability? Stable
:6. Images?: Ok
Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved.  After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again.  If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice.  Thank you for your work so far.— Ruslik (talk) 08:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I actually meant something more than two sentences. Please, make lead consist of two really long paragraphs. Ruslik (talk) 06:44, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Now it looks much better. Ruslik (talk) 19:55, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article nomination on hold

message: Don't write this:
:  \Gamma\, << \nu\,
Instead write this:
:  \Gamma \ll \nu\,
Don't write this:
:  < \Delta r^2 > \,
Instead write this:
:  \langle \Delta r^2 \rangle \,
I've fixed these in the article.  All such cleanups should be finished before this is declared a Good Article. Michael Hardy (talk) 15:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Math notation cleanup 

message: I tried to see how I could improve the article. Difficult! However the diagram below uses a\ modified imagemap to label the illustration. Any advice? This I think also labels the start position more clearly. Move your cursor over the diagram... Victuallers (talk) 21:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: image

message: The source for an imagemap based on this diagram is stored here Victuallers 21:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That might be a little over-crowded - it'd be easier if the balls in the end positions were partially transparent. Adam Cuerden talk 04:15, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Aye, I know it's not new, but I still think it'd be a bit clearer if the starting point wasn't the same for five different processes - it gets very crowded, and can be hard to follow. Not one of your best works, I fear. Adam Cuerden talk 20:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Actually, maybe if you fixed the arrow for 2, so it wasn't mostly covered, that might help. They already are slightly transparent, but perhaps could be a little moreAdam Cuerden talk 20:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well thrilled that you think that this one of "my best works" but no. I have only added the imagemap to Runningamok19 artwork. I agree that the weakish point of the diag is the common starting point but thats why I add the imagemap as its a difficult concept to do in one static diagram. Hopefully is improved. Victuallers (talk) 21:53, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree the image could use a little work.  Will upload an improved version tomorrow. Runningamok19 (talk) 04:00, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: imagemap
Talk:Kolonka

message: BTW, Kolonka  (колонка) is a indoor gas water heater in Russian. Odessaukrain (talk) 05:04, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: indoor gas water heater 
Talk:TAS1R1

message: The TAS1R1 page was a stub, so I edited the page to contain much more information about the properties of the receptor. I used a few of the further reading articles in the page and added a few of my own. I also added two external links to Gene Cards and OMIM for further information about the gene. 
Kelsiejaness (talk) 02:45, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion
Talk:Pig scalder

message: Hello, I think it would be good to possibly explain when pig scalders were first used (the history behind them and their invention). Unrelated and on a different note, some facts that would be an interesting addition would be, for example, how hot the scalders usually are kept. I just think these would be an interesting addition to have a little bit more information on them and their part in pig slaughter so there are no misconceptions! Iadowty (talk) 19:02, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome to add such information if you can cite reliable sources for the information.  †Dismas†|(talk) 21:17, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Additions
Talk:TAS1R2

message: The TAS1R2 page was a stub, so I edited the page to contain much more information about the properties of the receptor. I used a few of the further reading articles in the page and added a few of my own. I also added two external links to Gene Cards and OMIM for further information about the gene. I also removed the information about cat taste because I no longer found it relevant to the page.
Kelsiejaness (talk) 02:49, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion
Talk:TAS1R3

message: The TAS1R3 page was a stub, so I edited the page to contain much more information about the properties of the receptor and its dimerization with TAS1R and TAS1R2. I used a few of the further reading articles in the page and added relevant information from other primary literature and review articles. I also added two external links to Gene Cards and OMIM for further information about the gene. 
Kelsiejaness (talk) 02:54, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion
Talk:Enviropig

message: I have tagged :File:8_months.jpg, which is in use in this article for deletion because it does not have a copyright tag. If a copyright tag is not added within seven days the image will be deleted. --Chris 10:18, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:8_months.jpg]] may be deleted 

message: I have tagged :File:16_months.jpg, which is in use in this article for deletion because it does not have a copyright tag. If a copyright tag is not added within seven days the image will be deleted. --Chris 10:20, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:16_months.jpg]] may be deleted 

message: I question the relevancy of this random speculation. In this day and age it's much harder to find something not believed to be a sign of the end of days by extremely right wing religious fanatics than it is to find one that is. If this is relevant enough for the page, then the page on Obama should include a section on how a great deal of people believe that he is the antichrist. -- 10:09 6 April 2011  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.89.161.169 (talk) 02:10, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to agree. It may deserve a sentence or two at most. Have boldly removed it for now. AIRcorn (talk) 09:44, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biblical Speculation 
Talk:Kakhetian pig

message: I've removed the proposed deletion tag from this because a Google search indicates that there are sources which could be used to expand the article. I've added another link to the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

message: The WikiProject classification for Kakhetian pig is Start-class. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria. If it should be a stub, then please set  on this talk page & reinstate the stub tag(s) on the article page.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  15:19, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please confirm classification
Talk:Bruin Alumni Association

message: I've removed the tags added last month for the following reasons: The npov tag because no effort was made by the person who added it, or anyone else for that matter, to point out what the specific NPOV issues that justified it were or to discuss, and resolve the issuse, and the notability tag because if the topic was notable enough to warrant the LA Times articles contained therein, it very well would notable enough for a article here. FeloniousMonk (talk) 05:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags removed 
Talk:Kopiko

message: This topic needs a disambiguation page, and needs to be split into 2 separate pages (one for each of the entities this word describes). philiptdotcom (talk) 04:15, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I will try and do it. Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:26, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:52, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs a disambiguation page...
Talk:Term paper

message: This is not a place to advertise writing services. I'm deleting the external links that can be construed as such.
128.194.31.196 (talk) 18:28, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

message: Is this article just about education in the US? Nothing wrong with that, but it should say so. Snugglepuss (talk) 15:45, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where does the term 'term paper' apply?
Talk:Sam Jensen Page

message: The "Additional references" section was just too long and wasn't adding anything to the article.  Some of them are already in the ref section, so are duplicates.  I've copied them here, so if anyone wants to expand the article with information from these refs, they can be used.  Thanks! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 05:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional references
File talk:World operators of the T-54.png

message: huh this is weird East Germany no longer exists! RoflOhLol (talk) 15:34, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  East Germany! 

message: Estonia doesn't have any of these tanks. You should also check Latvia and Lithuania, I'm not sure about them...H2ppyme (talk) 20:16, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Estonia

message: I miss some explanation of the different colors used in this map. What does red mean, what does dark red mean, what does red/dark red mixed mean? 90.134.10.42 (talk) 00:53, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Colors
Talk:The Chaser's Age of Terror Variety Hour

message: How about some of us who went to see this show put our head together and create a content section about it? I can try and outline what was in the show, but i only saw it once and I imagine that it would be slightly different whereever it went. (Like they wouldn't talk about the Pulp Mill) Katana Geldar 09:13, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Content
Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Regine Velasquez

message: i want to expand and edit the protected page List of awards and nominations received by Regine Velasquez the page was deleted without a valid reason. im willing to re edit and add some sources in it.
Russart 1999 05:35, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done:  The page wasn't deleted; it was redirected and protected due to this deletion discussion. Individual admins don't have the authority to override the results of deletion discussions, so I can't fulfil this request. Instead, you should first talk with Juliancolton, who closed the deletion discussion, to see if you can come to an arrangement. If that is not possible, you can appeal the decision at deletion review. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 06:19, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 28 February 2014 

message: Good day to wiki administrators, I'm willing to improve this page by adding proper information and reliable sources. Can someone unlock this? thanks in advance Russart 1999 (talk) 17:47, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Just as  told you last time. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:02, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 12 May 2014 

message: Please edit this page to redirect directly to Regine Velasquez, to avoid a double redirect. Thank you!
—Granger (talk · contribs) 02:39, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Done — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 07:42, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 12 January 2016 

message: Hi,
Following an edit request that has been granted by one of the administrators involved during the AfD discussion back in 2013, this article has been rewritten, appropriately sourced and formatted to adhere to MOS:LIST. Any future edits should be cited/sourced accordingly. Thanks Pseud 14 (talk) 12:09, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article edit request grant
Talk:BoomBox (American band)

message: I added an "inappropriate tone" tag to the article.  Seems a little too boosterish.  "Fans find this unique sound irresistible" and so forth.  Could be improved.Bjones (talk) 14:01, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone

message: I remember "Fans find this unique sound irresistible" to be a quote from an article in the news and its seemed to define the sound with a source... The article is no longer available.  Sentence removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Caulfield-catcher (talk • contribs) 23:01, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Seems a little too boosterish." 

message: As well as mentioning who Zion's mother is, shouldn't the article also mention his father (Keith Godchaux, keyboardist for the Grateful Dead, who died in an auto accident in 1980 or 81)?
117.194.193.207 (talk) 04:08, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  BoomBox info
Talk:Commissioner of Public Works

message: Don't many other states have a Commissioner of Public Works? AnteaterZot (talk) 07:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Um...

message: There are "Public Works Commissioners" all over the US, and the world for that matter. This page needs to be revsed and unlinked from the New Jersy pages.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.84.190.194 (talk) 18:14, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is way wrong.
Talk:Anzob Tunnel

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for Anzob Tunnel. Should be 39.108718 N and 68.687103 E
—67.170.222.214 (talk) 19:54, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears to me that the coordinates you've given above are those of the northern portal of the tunnel, whereas those in the article are those of the tunnel's southern portal. Neither seems to be incorrect; I will, however, split the difference and change the coordinates to correspond roughly to the middle of the tunnel. That seems best to me if only one set of coordinates are used. Deor (talk) 23:14, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Compact closed category

message: The definition here is not the usual definition of trace. Trace of f:A --> A should be a morphism I to I, where I is the unit for the monoidal structure. Think in Vect, where Vect(k,k) \cong k. Then tr(f) = e_A c (f # 1) n_A, where n and e are the coevaluation and evaluation maps, c is the braiding or symmetry, and "#" is the tensor product. This gives the usual notion of trace.
For traces in categories that are not compact, you need a pivotal structure.
Also, adjoint are of course only defined for morphisms. In order to say that an object is a left adjoint, you need to mention that you are looking at a monoidal category as a one-object bicategory. There is obviously no need for that, because you can define a left dual as you do.
Should say, adjoints are defined for functors, so if you want to say A^* is the left adjoint for A then it is better to say A^* \otimes - is the left adjoint of A \otimes -. Or indeed, explain the one object bicategory version.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.132.115 (talk) 11:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: trace
Talk:Direct-response marketing

message: This article is rambling and full of as much "jargon" as possible. The concept of direct-response marketing is very simple. Why is the explanation so long and repetitive. 69.177.33.159 (talk) 06:43, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion

message: suggesting a archive section .. Sanjiv swarup (talk) 05:35, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  suggesting a archive section ..  

message: Some of the links appear to be the company promotionals sales pitch and I would think we'd look more to news sites, statistics, stories not individual companies?  What do you think?
I don't mind lists of companies on another page or vendors, but I'm looking to see what the rules are for these types of postings on the links on the main page.   Thanks.
Pmiles (talk) 22:06, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  question
Talk:List of guzheng players

message: Michelle Kwan is becoming well-known for performing a variety of popular pieces on the guzheng. Does she belong on this list? 
(ref: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJ7StSaKnlKzBLzqyOr5ieg)
87.113.53.226 (talk) 02:04, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Contemporary Players
Category talk:United States military personnel of the American Revolution

message: I removed :Category:Members of the United States armed forces from this category because it is a duplicate category of :Category:American military personnel.  I just proposed a merging of these two categories.  This category is already within :Category:American military personnel by war, which is within :Category:American military personnel, which is within :Category:Military of the United States.  I believe this is the only categorization needed for this category within :Category:Military of the United States.  --Scott Alter 19:43, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorization in "Members of the United States armed forces"