lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Freeport, Kansas

message: # Please read  editing tutorial and  new contributor help page before editing the first time. This  cheatsheet is useful.
# Please read  content guidelines for US city articles.
: Sbmeirow (talk) 01:45, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing The Article 

message: Is this place really a "city"? HistoryBA 00:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Legally speaking, apparently so.  I would assume it used to be much larger, and gradually shrank Nik42 05:28, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, Freeport is a town.  In Europe it would be a village or a hamlet, but in the U.S. it's a town.  The original author of the article inserted the word "city" without thinking. StudierMalMarburg 15:58, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Yes, Freeport was a third class city in Kansas. Last year it was voted to be dissolved (http://www.hutchnews.com/news/20171205/freeport-kansas-how-states-smallest-city-decided-its-time-was-up). Brent524 (talk) 14:58, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  City? 
Talk:Constance Baker Motley

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Constance Baker Motley was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 16:30, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.--TommyBoy (talk) 03:39, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Mrs. Constance B. Motley, first woman Senator, 21st Senatorial District, N.Y., raising hand in V sign.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for December 23, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-12-23. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.9% of all FPs 17:36, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD 

message: — Assignment last updated by Amulumudi (talk) 19:15, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Gender, Judges, and Digital Literacy
Talk:Stigma (ligature)

message: How is stigma pronounced?
:st
probably... Wikisquared 10:31, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: The first letter of the word in the photo looks like an elision of sigma and tau.
It looks nothing like the "stigma" character discussed in the main article: such
an elision could have been done by someone who'd never seen a stigma.
Is this really a good example? Dark Formal 21:50, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photograph

message: The article omits the most famous and well known use of the letter Stigma: The famous χξς or 666 of the Book of Revelations 13:18, the Stigma being the last 6. 
Also, the statement: "...did not occur in ancient times and only dates to later medieval manuscripts." is questionable. The argument is based on the omission of Stigma in one Greek source, while the presence of Stigma is found in the Koine Greek book of Revelations. Many scholars place the writing of this book in the life time of St. John, making it an early 2nd century, and not a "later medieval manuscript."Prelgovisk (talk) 15:10, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I think this is a misunderstanding. What the Revelations example shows is that the numeral sign for "6" existed. But that numeral sign is the original digamma, which of course always had that function. What did not exist at that time was the s-t ligature, used as an s-t ligature. That arose later and was then graphically conflated with the other. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:16, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: To the best of my knowledge, the ancient manuscripts for Revelation 13:18 spell out "six hundred sixty six" (ἑξακόσιοι ἑξήκοντα ἕξ) in words, anyway.  I believe the Chi-Xi-Stigma (χξϛʹ) form in numerals only occurs in medieval copies. -- Radagast3 (talk) 13:20, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Although it seems Papyrus 47 uses numerals in upper case: ΧΞϜ -- Radagast3 (talk) 05:28, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition

message: Why is this not listed in the template?
—DIV (128.250.80.15 (talk) 06:35, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template 

message: How is lowercase stigma distinguished from an end-of-word sigma? A2Kafir (and...?) 22:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no idea. I'm trying to understand this myself, but the most I've gotten is that stigma is mostly unused nowadays as a letter. Maybe stigma always used to end a word, which means that every word that ends in lowercase sigma in modern greek actually used to end in stigma. Thus, sigma used to only have two cases, whereas now it has three. For what reason? I'm working on that. That could be and probably is totally wrong: Someone please explain it better, the article doesn't really. -Panther (talk) 22:19, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinguishing it from sigma 

message: There's an image captioned
:Incorrect transition of sigma and tau to stigma.
If it's incorrect, why is it even on the site? Could someone who knows something about this replace it with something that's actually informative?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.238.113.249 (talk) 16:50, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fake origin of stigma
Talk:Matt Foley

message: I was under the impression that the character was named for a teacher Farley had in high school, who was also a Catholic priest. Can anyone confirm? 82.109.90.179 00:47, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: IIRC, they had done the table bit before (on a different skit). Back in 1991....on a skit called "NRA Theatre". I still kind of wonder if the prat fall in this skit was planned because of the reactions of the actors involved.Rja13ww33 (talk) 19:43, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:No Need for Alarm

message: --Mr. Dude †@£К ║ Çøת†яĭβü†ĬŎИ 00:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Viveiro

message: There was a short page entitled Vivero. I have made that page a redirect here. Here is the text of the old page. Could somebody please verify the marriage information and add it to this page?
"Vivero (Spanish for "green house") is a town in Galicia, in the province of Lugo, Spain.
In Portuguese the town's name is Viveiro or Viveiros. Juan de Vivero is said to have been a noble man from Vivero. He owned the estate where Isabella of Castile married Ferdinand the Catholic of Aragon giving birth to the Spanish kingdom and future empire."
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivero"  Jameswilson 00:51, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Viveiro/Vivero indeed are one and the same place- the former is the galician spelling, the latter, spanish. Most of the present article seems to be an attempted translation of the equivalent article in es.wiki.--cjllw | TALK 09:05, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I will be working on this page, but slowly. The bulk of the information here is taken from the English language version of the city's official web site. I will be comparing it with the Castillian and Galego vesions and re-wording it a bit to make it English. I foresee a lot of small changes. --Sean Lotz 21:36, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning up 
Talk:George Bass

message: I think the explorer Bass is by far the most prominent of the two men shown.  See "what links here" for a start.  I propose to move him back and put a see also to the second.  -- Kevin Ryde 00:52, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely agreed -- Chuq 01:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

text: OK, all done -- Chuq 03:26, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambig 

message: I am interested in doing three seperate entries for each of the expeditions Bass took part in. Perhaps The route of the Tom Thumb expedition ??// The route of the Norfolk expedition??. But what would could you call the second trip in the unnamed 'gunboat' and probably the most famous of the three? Please any ideas?. Lentisco 03:47, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good Question. In the interim since August the WP:AH has been set up. A few guidelines for naming these artciles is shown at . Please refer to this as a guide. As a default the name would be Bass voyage of 1797 for the 'gunboat' voyage, and Bass voyage of 1798. Hope this helps. PS If you are interested in helping out with more exploration related articles or history subjects the link above will take you to a near exhaustive list of notable (as well as some that are less notable)expeditions. Feel free to go at it. SauliH 04:25, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bass's three expeditions

message: I added some things to this article on 3/6/08 but the sections "Final Voyage" and "Speculation on Bass's Fate" seem to have disappeared. It wasn't my intention to delete them. If I have, inadvertently, I hope someone puts them back.  Peter Entwisle. Peter Entwisle (talk) 10:33, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've put them back. You ended a reference with "" instead of " which caused half the article to be in footnote 2. Not to worry, I've fixed it. I've also added a section to this page - you can do that by clicking on the "New section" link. Graham87 12:15, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Section disappearances
Talk:Inside Carolina

message: Is this article really necessary?  Hasn't this been an article before then deleted a bunch of times already?  I might be biased but IC is just a branch of scout.com.  I understand that it used to be its own entity but I don't really see the need for this article.  I recommend that this be deleted (again) on the grounds that it is a vanity page
Drunkasian 15:01, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  vote for deletion 

message: Please remember that additions to this article should include a reference. Also, vandalizing the page isn't very helpful at all; if you don't like the page, there's an AfD. Isopropyl 15:34, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New content 

message: I have removed the "famous threads" and the slang guide section of the page. If the thread is sufficiently notable as to be referenced to an outside publication, you may mention it within the body of the article, but please do not create a list of nonnotable forum threads. Also, Wikipedia is not a slang dictionary; see WP:NOT for clarification. Isopropyl 16:01, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous threads/slang guide 

message: This article was nominated for deletion. The result was no consensus to delete among established Wikipedian voters. For details, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inside Carolina. bd2412 T 01:52, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD results 

message: The IC forum is the most popular on the entire scout.com network, there should be absolutely no reason to delete it. It serves as a place to discuss UNC athletics and also a chance for people to meet at the games, tailgate and hangout. Squadoosh 12:02, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  no reason to delete 

message: The above post by "drunkasian" is incorrect.  Inside Carolina is 100% independently owned - they merely have a publishing contract with Scout.com, as is the case with all other publishers on Scout.com.  Scout.com does not own or control any of Inside Carolina content.  So this article should most certainly not be deleted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.177.137.244 (talk) 17:10, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should NOT be deleted 

message: I can not speak to someone about joining Inside Carolina by opening a yearly account.
Please call my office # 301-340-1333 or my cell # 301-802-1090
Thank please call ASAP 2603:3003:4800:5000:F9A8:9CB9:D533:56E2 (talk) 19:42, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This is Wikipedia, not Inside Carolina, we can not help you. --StellarNerd (talk) 19:45, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subscribing
Talk:Miami Conservancy District

message: The five articles for each of the dams are a little short; I think
it would be better were they merged into this article. Also, information on costruction could be merged into Dry dam. If no one objects,
I'll go ahead and execute the merge this weekend. WildWeathel 01:03, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think brevity by itself should be the sole criteria by which a standalone article is judged, but in this case, I have to agree that merging the five dams into the main article is a "dam" good idea.David 15:15, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed, length is not the only reson for merging articles. For the record, I think these five articles should be merged here and into "Dry dam" because they are short, have not been expanded since the original contribution, and because of overlapping descriptions of the construction of dry dams. The merging how-to states that articles should be merged "if a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much". Since the articles haven't been expanded since August 2004, these articles should be merged. Besides, the article can always be split if it grows later. Thanks for the encouragement; this is my first edit beyond spot fixes. WildWeathel 17:26, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dam article merge
Talk:Foot worship

message: Lawl! This article made me laugh numerous times, thank you! :) --Hellogoodsir 22:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Now, if some folks would discuss it on the talk page, or at least give the community a reason why, before redirecting an entire article into another one, that would e great! I'm not saying the last edition was a good one, it wasn't, but I feel the redirection must be reverted before a good reason has been presented to the community. Feel free to revert my alterations.
MammonI.Dumah (talk) 06:23, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I redirected it before seeing this notice, so will now try and justify it. I believe the articles are about the same thing, but the Foot fetishism is actually referenced. I am going through  backlog of articles needing merged and this is a pretty certain candidate. Jamesx12345 (talk) 12:14, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Use the Talk Page
Talk:Kink (sexuality)

message: I really don't think an article such as Kink needs further expansion. --RiverHockey 18:49, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, I do. --Nemissimo II 10:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion discussion

message: Shouldn't the TV series have a different name. There already are several aticles called kink, and these are the only two that are merged.
I revised the discussion of the TV show to make its relevance to this page clearer. Hope that helps. Dpmath (talk) 22:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: since the tv series has its own page, cant we remove this whole section? there have been innumerable references to kinky behavior on tv...Vinithehat (talk) 04:19, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: done.Vinithehat (talk) 17:20, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV 

message: Might it make sense to move the article to have a title of Kinky (sexual)? I think kinky is a much more common phrase, compared to kink. Drum guy (talk)
I think "kink" is the more common term among practitioners; "kinky" is sometimes a pejorative term, and besides, it's an adjective whereas most articles are about nouns.Dpmath (talk) 22:22, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Kinky (sexual) 

message: On 29 March 2019 Soarwakes boldly converted this page into a redirect towards BDSM, removing all its content, without any prior discussion. The edit summary said "same subject, redirect". However, the definition of Kink was:  In contrast, the definition of BDSM is the more specific:  The two terms are understood within the field of human sexuality to have different meanings. Furthermore, Soarwakes has not attempted to preserve the content on this page by merging it with BDSM. For these reasons I would suggest restoring this article. -- Polly Tunnel (talk) 11:21, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conversion of this article to a redirect page 
Talk:Profit (TV series)

message: Is Profit really the same genre as Sopranos and 24? Are Sopranos and 24 really in the same genre? Hackwrench 01:06, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither The Pretender nor John Doe had a main character who was a villain.  How do you justify placing them in the same genre? - turbov21
Anybody been watching Dexter ? I'd put that in the same class.
The Stealth Ranger 09:58, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 

message: WP:NOR. I mean, that's just blatant. --MattShepherd 18:07, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted "Rumination." (a professional psychological profile, in fact)

message: As stated in the dialogue, Profit's father bought everything in the house from G&G.  The box is a leftover shipping carton from one of those deliveries.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.101.37.96 (talk) 10:06, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:   Changed "moving box" to "shipping box" 

message: I can't seem to figure out how to add a new link to the "External Links" portion of the page, the link I'd like to include is the official Anchor Bay page for the 2005 release of the Profit DVD which is here: http://www.hyfntrak.com/profit/AFF18754/
It contains video clips and photographs from the show and I think it should be included; is the external links section of this page locked out for changes?  Thanks!
Orac2 (talk) 16:38, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Added it for you. Cardsplayer4life (talk) 07:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anchor Bay Profit Page 

message: I've moved these newly-added quotes to the talk page, as articles are not meant to contain such listings. Perhaps one notable one can be chosen to accent the article, but that's it.— TAnthonyTalk 22:28, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: To clarify, this would be more appropriate for Wikiquote, per Wikipedia:Quotations#When not to use quotations. Thanks.— TAnthonyTalk 22:31, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Memorable Jim Profit Quotes

message: This tag was added almost 5 years ago and the article has been significantly updated with numerous references since then.  Removing tag.  User:Orac2  —Preceding undated comment added 19:28, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Citations Tags Removal
Talk:Malibu Comics

message: Anyone feel that Dinosaurs for Hire requires its own page? Communist47 05:15, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It certainly deserves one. Luis Dantas 02:52, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dinosaurs for Hire 
Talk:War Memorial Opera House

message: WHAT is this supposed to mean?? Vivaverdi 01:30, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Mayhap it is a reference to Napoleon?Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:59, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Short of Paris...." 
Talk:NAC Breda

message: I think I may have jumped the gun -- I just realized that Stewart is "technical manager".  I'm used to the director técnico in Spanish meaning the coach, but maybe that's not true in Netherlands.   I'm reverting my change until I know what this position means for sure. - PhilipR 15:25, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical manager - Stewart  

message: Reconstruction finished, upgraded the artcile to B-class. From what I understand, this will automatically trigger an assesment.
--Martijnmureau (talk) 08:43, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reconstruction

message: Has the note of City Football Group owning the club a little premature as although it is in process, it has not formally completed as of the time of typing? 86.26.128.233 (talk) 21:20, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership of Club
Talk:Willem II (football club)

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support per the naming conventions for sports teams. The team refers to itself as Willem II on its own website, but since Willem II could refer to a couple of other subjects, the disambiguator "football club" should be used. – PeeJay 12:37, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
Moved - If anyone wants to start a discussion to get this article moved back to Willem II Tilburg, they are welcome to do so, but this article shouldn't be moved again without discussion. – PeeJay 08:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Willem II Tilburg → Willem II (football club) — This article was moved from Willem II Tilburg to Willem II (football club) a year ago, following the above move request. Last June,  moved it back to Willem II Tilburg, without any discussion. I have asked for an explanation on his talk page, but he hasn't responded. I request that this page be moved back to Willem II (football club), corresponding to the consensus that was established above. 94.212.31.237 (talk) 12:57, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Second move request

message: This page, as opposed to many other Dutch teams, does not have a vectorial logo for the team.
Here is one that could be used: https://worldvectorlogo.com/nl/download/willem-ii.svg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Friggigatto (talk • contribs) 15:16, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo
Talk:Zaqqum

message: This information, if added to the article on the "zaqqum tree", would, of course, be viciously deleted by someone with NO Knowledge of the subject:
The "Tree of Life" in Genesis 3:24 is a symbol for the Vision of the "Son of man", symbolized in the Quran as both the "Night Journey" of Mohammed and the "sidrah tree" of Sura 53.
On the other hand, the "tree of the knowledge of good and evil" in Genesis 2:9 is symbolized by the "zaqqum tree" in the Quran.
The "Tree of Life" symbolizes the consciousness Created 'by and in the image of God' (Genesis 1:27)--this is the non-dualistic consciousness of the Eastern esoteric traditions--and the Sons of Light; whereas the "tree of the knowledge of good and evil" symbolizes the 'fallen' consciousness--that is, the dualistic consciousness of the Eastern religions and philosophies--of the "self" and the 'thinker' and the Sons of Darkness.
Michael J. Cecil
2602:306:CDB5:8A60:95E5:36C2:3E09:61A2 (talk) 22:45, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Talk:SC Cambuur

message: The "supporters" section has been written by someone with obvious knowledge but the English could be improved, plus there are no references given. --Kristian 14:48, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

message: please update new logo  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.179.23.179 (talk) 05:02, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old logo
Talk:FC Emmen

message: the official website for the club as of christmas 06 is: http://www.bvoemmen.nl/ hopefully someone can add it in in the proper place, and perhaps do so for all the Ereste Division teams. Theasfl 01:36, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Fortuna Sittard

message: The redirect 2023–24 Fortuna Sittard season has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:2023–24 Fortuna Sittard season]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Go Ahead Eagles

message: Really? It's an English term. They pronounce it the way they do in English. KarstenO (talk) 13:35, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dutch Pronunciation 

message: The redirect 2023–24 Go Ahead Eagles season has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:12, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:2023–24 Go Ahead Eagles season]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]