Talk:Padahuthurai bombing

message: I believe that the current event tag should be taken off. It happend a month ago so I see no reason in it being "on going"... Watchdogb 05:07, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: current event

message: See relevant policies. It says When a well-known, professional researcher writing within his or her field of expertise, or a well-known professional journalist, has produced self-published material, these may be acceptable as sources, so long as his or her work has been previously published by credible, third-party publications that is from WP:SPS#Self-published_sources. Hence I conclude thar David Jeyaraj's version of the event should be left in the article, not deleted RaveenS 01:03, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of source from this article

message: I was looking at the peer view section at my own Article (Starships!), and saw this article right below it, un-peer-viewed, like mine. I thought I'd take a look. I am astonished at how well layed out this article is. I know nothing of the politics or the circumstances, or on how biased or unbiased this topic may be, but I will say that this is perhaps the best article I've ever seen on wikipedia when you are considering spelling, grammar, asthetics, photos, and layout. If the material is unbiased, and I hope it is because I wouldn't know (it seems to be), then I see no reason this should not be a featured article. I wish Starships! was 10% of this quality. Matt Brennen 17:57, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I respectfully and strongly disagree with the above review.  See my recent edits on narrative writing style, metric/english measurement flip-flops, messed up sentence structure, spelling errors, a random parenthesis (!) in the middle of a sentence, and a few sentences that were completely unnecessary to the article.  I've re-written whole paragraphs.  The quotes were badly formatted (blocked, but with no quotation marks!).  I'd strongly encourage a few more people to critically proofread this article for spelling, grammar, typos and sentence structure.  It does a decent job (as far as I can tell) of being NPOV despite a clearly controversial topic, and cites it sources well.  After a few more people look over this and give it some more polish, I think it'd be a worthy GA candidate.  Nswinton 20:27, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you both for the kind words and hard work, after all both go a long way in making wikipedia a better place. Number of editors were involved in creating this article. I am encouraged by the GA comment. We will keep at it, one article at a time. Thanks again Taprobanus 22:18, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not exactly a peer view 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Padahuthurai bombing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070310024231/http://www.boston.com:80/news/world/asia/articles/2007/01/02/sri_lankan_air_force_says_tamil_base_hit/ to http://www.boston.com/news/world/asia/articles/2007/01/02/sri_lankan_air_force_says_tamil_base_hit/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:55, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Padahuthurai bombing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070111120136/http://transcurrents.com:80/tamiliana/archives/263 to http://transcurrents.com/tamiliana/archives/263/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070125095252/http://my.christiantoday.com:80/article/church-criticises-sri-lankan-air-force-raid-civilian-deaths/4364.htm to http://my.christiantoday.com/article/church-criticises-sri-lankan-air-force-raid-civilian-deaths/4364.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927215234/http://www.southasianmedia.net/cnn.cfm?id=353558&category=civil%20society&Country=SRI%20LANKA to http://www.southasianmedia.net/cnn.cfm?id=353558&category=civil%20society&Country=SRI%20LANKA
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070414081345/http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGASA370042006 to http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGASA370042006
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:42, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Padahuthurai bombing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070625102927/http://www.slmm.lk/press_releases/statement%20-%20air%20strike.pdf to http://www.slmm.lk/press_releases/statement%20-%20air%20strike.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://transcurrents.com/tamiliana/archives/263/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://my.christiantoday.com/article/church-criticises-sri-lankan-air-force-raid-civilian-deaths/4364.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070224001039/http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=20349 to http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=20349
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:54, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified