Talk:Ephialtes of Trachis

message: I will create a seperate article for the Athenian politician Ephialtes.--Yannismarou 11:14, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It is also possible that Ephialtes was in fact a great hero to Sparta. Based on his actions, it seems that he was the only one who understood what Leonidas was really doing and thus concluded the importance of the Persian army discovering that old path in time. If it wasn't for Ephialtes, the 300 would have run out from the front before they are outflanked by Xerxes and thus not proving he is a coward as the Leonidas has always stated. So really what Leonidas was thinking to hold them long enough just until the other path is discovered. I thinking the king was glad to hear that someone knows of the path, but his loyalty to Sparta was a problem. When Ephialtes asked to join the Spartans in battle, Leonidas found it an opportunity to bring out any hatred or betrayal that Ephialtes might be hiding for him or Sparta. The dented shield gave Leonidas the impression that Ephialtes is a pretender, very very true! beyond the king's wisdom at the time. Ephialtes dented his father's shield and went to see the king only to ask if he should do it or not. Leonidas' actions and how he handled the interview, trying to ridicule the hunchback by asking him to lift his shield was enough proof to Ephialtes what Leonidas wanted him to do.
The brave Ephialtes knowing fully well that Xerxes' men might not be loyal and word might not reach the emperor in time, he had to go to him himself!
In the end, when Ephialtes approached the king and brought spearing Xerxes' to his attention, Leonidas finally realized that there was someone even braver and more honorable, he wished him to live for ever thus receiving divine status.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.244.119.94 (talk) 04:35, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sir, your ignorance knows no bounds. Do not base your views Ephialtes by watching 300. My sincere advise to you would be to read extensively on this matter. 59.164.112.66 (talk) 06:43, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I would also like to add that 300 is almost 100% pure fabrication.  And while your view is interesting, it completely contradicts actual Spartan custom and culture.  When Leonidas told Ephialtes to "live forever", he was in effect telling him that he was dishonorable and deserved to "live with his crime forever".  For a Spartan, dying on the battlefield (not needlessly of course) was one of the best ways to live.  If you live forever, that isn't going to happen, is it?TOneMillion (talk) 19:37, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Spelling of the above is questionable (it's betrayal), but the point is good.  In modern Greek, Ephialtes does mean nightmare (look it up on Google Translate), and its root, according to the Greek naval officer I served with briefly, it's origin is from Ephialtes of Trachis for his actions at Thermopylae.  Trivial knowledge, but interesting, and worthy of addition to the page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.45.205.110 (talk) 05:03, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theories 

message: in the article "Battle of Thermopylae", it is stated that it is not completely sure that the Thebans were hostages who (as stated in this article) "surrendered at the first chance", should i change it?
tavy 16:07, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A little musiunderstanding 

message: If it's due to his psilotic dialect, this could be explained... AnonMoos (talk) 00:16, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Epialtes in Herodotus

message: :he is consigned to noncombatant duties that do not satisfy his desire for a sense of belonging
Is there any indication of this being the case in preceding works?
If you were on the far left side of a Phalanx (hugging a wall, nobody to protect) that this actually wouldn't matter... since you only need to protect the man to your left and there would be no man to your left if you were on the far left of a line holding a pass.
There was also the various non-Spartans helping out, who were not forming Phalanxes either, who Ephialtes could have worked with.
If he was offered these options in the comic (or maybe some director's cut version of the film I haven't seen) then his betrayal would be more brutal and evil.
In the film he was only told to (1) remove dead (2) tend to wounded (3) fetch water.
But he could have fought on the right side of the Phalanx or with the goatherders who were not part of the Phalanx and who would charge into the melee during moments that the Phalanx broke.
Leonidas didn't even explore those opportunities.
When all he wanted to do was proof himself in combat, and he was denied any kind of combat role whatsoever even though there were many points in the film where the Phalanx broke up and Ephialtes inability to shield a comrade wouldn't have mattered. Ranze (talk) 03:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006 film vs 1998 comic

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Ephialtes of Trachis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060829135732/http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/h/herodotus/h4m/chapter7.html to http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/h/herodotus/h4m/chapter7.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:58, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified