lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Edmund Hamilton

message: Request clarification on the spelling of Hamilton's first name. Most sources give it as Edmond, not Edmund. Ugajin 08:56, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Per amazon.com & www.fantasticfiction.co.uk it's Edmond. A Google search on "Edmund Hamilton" shows minimal results of which most are inconsistent in their spelling. I've reverted the change as it seems pretty clear it's an mistake. -- JLaTondre 14:57, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Miguel Miramón

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Patrick Jonker Veloway

message: "making it one of the safest places to ride in Adelaide."  I would not agree with this assertion as there are several blind corners when climbing southwards and the oncoming downhill riders get up plenty of speed!  I have not yet collided with one but we are talking about inches sometimes and it doesn't "feel" as safe as this claim makes it out to be. Mykro 04:39, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So fix it... but there are no cars to contend with and this sounds like bad riding by the downhillers more than any other problem. Ill take a blind corner or two over cars rushing past all the time any day. Crashing into other bikes is a lot less dangerous than crashing into cars ... :: maelgwn - talk 04:48, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm hard pressed to think of anywhere safer, the Veloway has no cars, trucks, trains, pedestrians, dogs or horses and I'm happy to take my chances with my fellow cyclists.Tophonic 10:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Having thought about it some more I realise its the vagueness of the term "safest places" that is niggling me. I would consider "making it one of the safest transit corridors in Adelaide." as a better description, if there are no objections. Mykro 02:39, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sounds fine to me Tophonic 09:07, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Brad Downey

message: So did or didn't he color bomb the KaDeWe?   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.162.12.156 (talk) 18:06, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is this paragraph removed:
He blamed himself of spraying Berlin's department store KaDeWe with green color. He said he had an order by Lacoste to do that. At that time, 2008, there was a Lacoste exhibition inside the KaDeWe prepared due to its 75 anniversary. -- Raubsaurier (talk) 18:53, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove of color attack 

message: I added a few more key pieces to the puzzle concerning the destruction of the Melania statue. In particular the artist was vocal about calling the police and how their piece did a better job than BLM activists pulling down statues of racists and slave-traders. TalonX77.13.122.107 (talk) 14:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: new information about vandalism
Talk:Alliance for the Future of Kosovo

message: I did these simple tests to check common English usage (along the lines of WP:UE): -considering only English-language results-
Google Print:
Google Scholar:
Amazon.com:
The New York Times:
BBC:
CNN:
Kosovo (18 books)
Kosovo (47 results)
Kosovo (8 books)
Kosovo (8 results)
Kosovo (18 results)
Kosovo (8 results)
Kosova (3 books)
Kosova (3 results)
Kosova (3 books)
Kosova (1 result)
Kosova (0 result)
Kosova (0 result)
Based on this, I'm reverting the last edit (diff.). - Best regards, Evv 09:46, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  of Kosovo or Kosova ? 

message: I'm confused as to whether this is a unitary party or an alliance. The article refers to it as a party but the articles for the "smaller parties" seem to refer to it as an alliance. I think some clarification is needed. Charles Essie (talk) 02:50, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political party or political alliance?
Talk:James of Piedmont

message: Amadeus (born 1363) and Louis (born 1364) could’nt be sons of Sybil (dead 1361), because they have been born after Sybils death. So they were son of  Marguerite de Beaujeu (1346 † 1402), married 1362. --79.6.219.203 (talk) 11:03, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amadeus, Luis and their actual mother
Talk:The Mysterious Mannequin

message: Nancy Drew, The Mysterious Mannequin's, genre is a mystery.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.229.145.69 (talk) 18:56, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre
Talk:Alexander Leighton

message: It is my understanding that, when used historically, the term "puritan" should only be applied in an English context (including English settlers in North America (and subsequent American generations) and English congregations in Europe).  Scottish presbyterians of the period may have had much in common with English puritans but there were a distinct group. However, the Catholic Apologetics reference does list Leighton as a puritan and so I am reluctant to edit the article to remove the word "puritan".  Greenshed 00:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Puritanism is a broad category that included Scottish Presbyterians as well as Pilgrims to America.Brian0324 16:10, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Puritan or Presbyterian (or both)
Talk:Helen Forrester

message: :Parts of Helen's autobiography seem to be untrue. The friend with a divorced mother and the sniffing dog seem to be non-existent.
::No names or other details are given. This silence makes it impossible to check.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.207.21 (talk) 10:49, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untrue 

message: How can HFs Autobiography be in resonse to critics' views on her novels when it appears to have been published before any of her fiction ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.43.48.142 (talk) 14:38, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: A novel is wrongly dated to 1959 in the obituary in the Daily Telegraph. It seems to have been published much later.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.42.37 (talk) 17:31, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It is usually dated to 1985.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.42.37 (talk) 17:33, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

text: Parts of her autobiography are untrue anyway, as noted above.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.42.37 (talk) 17:35, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date misalignment ?
File talk:Grace budd.gif

message: Where does this picture come from? Rich Farmbrough, 10:38 6  January 2007 (GMT).
:I don't know, but I believe this is a family snapshot of Grace Budd.  I find it very unlikely that copyright was claimed on the picture, and it was created before 1977, so I do think it qualifies as public domain.  But more information about the image would be good.  Mangojuicetalk 16:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Source
Talk:Poison discography

message: Should the MTV Unplugged be added?//Nitrofest
I don't know of the MTV Unplugged being a video? only tracks on the Crack a smile Album (NendoShisu 22:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Videos

message: Articles about remastered editions and originals are almost 100% similar! Don't you think we' better merge 'em? (Nitrofest 07:51, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Remastered editions

message: Please, if anyone knows it, post them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JKKDARK (talk • contribs) 20:55, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worldwide sales per album 
Talk:FACTNet

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 09:28, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 March 2023
Talk:Secret Six (Chicago)

message: I suggest this be moved to "Secret six (Chicago)" rather then its current name as there doesn't appear to be any previous use of it. 68.39.174.238 11:08, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought it was a good suggestion, so I carried it out. --Kineticman (talk) 23:44, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name and move
Talk:Lindsay Hassett

message: The claim that Armstrong was the first Catholic captain is incorrect.  Armstrong was a practising Catholic. -- Mattinbgn\talk 22:53, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Catholic captain 

message: Why does the lead have to have so much info?-it gets dry and boring after a while. Aaroncrick  TALK 09:39, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead
Talk:Châlons-en-Champagne

message: anyone know where the 103rd Aero Squadron airfield is/was? Brian in denver (talk) 01:09, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: La Noblette
Talk:242

message: This default for the search string "242" seems a bit trivial doesn't it?  I was searching, of course, for UN resolution 242.  How does one go about changing the default?
:You don't change the default. If you have a look at Wikipedia:Naming conventions, you'll see that article names simply consisting of digits are reserved for the years. You'll findn other meanings at 242 (number) or 242 (disambiguation) (for the UN resolution, you'll find it at UN Resolution 242). /Ludde23 Talk Contrib 15:29, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: It seems odd and anachronistic to refer to Eugenius I and Titus as patriarchs of Constantinople, given that the city was not yet called Constantinople and Constantine wasn't even born yet in 242. This sent me on a confused search today, until I found on Wikipedia's page "List of ecumenical patriarchs of Constantinople" that the title was Bishop of Byzantium until 330, which makes a great deal more sense. I understand linking to the same page that is currently linked, but should the text say Bishop of Byzantium instead? Or is it a convention on Wikipedia to use current titles rather than historical ones? Silver-grasp (talk) 15:50, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patriarch of Constantinople
Talk:FM-transmitter

message: Should this article be merged with "FM transmitter (personal device)" ?
Or better still:
* 1) Merge into a single "FM transmitter (personal device)}" page 
* 2) Create a disambiguation page for "FM transmitter" to distinguish from highpower broadcast transmitters
87.112.3.141 11:37, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merge
Talk:Hans Apel

message: Would an interview with transcript with Hans Apel from 1987 be useful here as an external link? Focus of conversation is nuclear weapons policy. http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_4D8B06EC44B341D1A5A996E0A9E3CA3A (I have a conflict of interest; otherwise I would add it myself.) Mccallucc (talk) 17:14, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link?
Talk:Foxy Brown (film)

message: # I support this move. --Yath 00:45, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

message: This move might be a bit confusing in the future, as I have heard there are plans to remake the film.
64.231.255.43 00:50, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Article moved from Foxy Brown (1974 film) to Foxy Brown (film), per request at Wikipedia:Requested moves. -GTBacchus(talk) 08:43, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Add in.  178.39.71.194 (talk) 23:43, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proud Mary
Category talk:Hindi words and phrases

message: Please change the name of category as "Urdu-Hindi words and phrases". Because , most of the mentioned words are in Urdu.--فیروز اردووالا (talk) 13:46, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Try asking at the help desks:) Fethroesforia 16:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Diaphragm valve

message: This article does not tell people what a diaphragm valve is and i don't think this article is up to wikipedia standards.  I don't know what a diaphragm valve is and its uses so i can't really improve this section or get any pictures.(Sam giles2001 12:32, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Various suggestions (up to 2011)

message: I have added a link to Praher a European manufactuer of Diaphragm valves, I believe the link is valid as it is a deep link directly related to the article and the info on the linked page is not practicle to include within the article. All of these reasons are included in the Wikipedia EL policy. If you disagree please discuss thanks--Drpipe 16:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you insist on linking to the websites of manufacturers, it should be done from the article for that manufacturer - not this specific article. The "list of manufacturers" is dubious at best, since Wikipedia is not a collection of lists WP:NOT - but it is a better solution at the moment than this "list" of external links, which certainly does not pass the guidelines. Nposs 05:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: The illustration lacks a cross-section edge on either side (across the entry and exit ports).  As such it can be misinterpreted as two different, strange illustrations instead of a single cross sectional diagram.
152.3.34.82 (talk) 18:45, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustration unclear (cross section)
Talk:National Institute on Media and the Family

message: It's just a POV ad! 193.140.197.56 12:32, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: First, this organization is not affiliated with any religious group. Second they do not condone any type of censorship. Basically they are trying to educate parents on some of the benefits and pitfalls of media and how it impacts children. Yes there are many other organizations that do not care for the Institute, but the fact is this is a helpful organizations. Thoughts? —Jgisler596 (talk) 03:18, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nowhere in the article does it sate that the organization is affiliated with any religious group or that it actively censors content from media providers. The NIMF is correctly assessed as a nonsectarian advocacy group. It may or may not be a helpful organization - this does not matter, the article must be written from a neutral point of view. Your edits replace referenced and neutral prose with what basically amounts to be an advertisement for the group. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 20:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's still considerable work left to do in polishing this article and including information on the group's activities. I'll try to flesh it out a bit. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 20:46, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Institute on Media and the Family Facts 
Talk:BBC Knowledge

message: The channel is currently available in Hong Kong on digital provider Now TV.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.246.168.23 (talk) 16:29, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Availability 

message: Would it be an idea to move BBC Knowledge to BBC Knowledge (UK) or BBC Knowledge (former) to disambiguate better from current international channel? Rafmarham (talk) 18:06, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I was just thinking that BBC Knowledge should go to the current channel (by move or redirect) as more people visiting that page will be looking for that. 202.44.184.197 (talk) 21:36, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 
Talk:Georges Feydeau

message: "Rueil-Malmaison" was plain "Rueil" in 1921 when Feydeau died there. It was renamed in 1928. Do the listed sources call it "Rueil-Malmaison"? Should we? Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 14:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: To partially answer my own question, Gidel uses "Rueil-Malmaison" for the first of nine mentions, then plain "Rueil" for the other eight. Esteban makes no mention of either. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 21:46, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

text: Agreed, considering the timing. 23impartial (talk) 14:49, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Rueil-Malmaison" 

message: I've just added an interlanguage link for "Tailleur pour dames" () to improve the utility of a conspicuous red link in the lead, and duplicated the same link in his list of works. I thought of doing the same for those others of his works that have articles at fr.wikipedia, but knowing how protective people can be about featured articles I thought I would ask here first. Does anyone object? Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 12:45, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with your plan. Having a reference in a different language is better than nothing. Definitely makes the article better. 23impartial (talk) 14:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interlanguage links for Feydeau's works?
Talk:Jean Giraudoux

message: Just to take a single example, the list of theatrical productions states:
::Song of Songs (1938, Comédie-Française)
What's wrong with this?
1 Firstly, the cultural imperialism of Wikipedia which insists that foreign langauage works must appear under their English title.
2 Song of Songs was not premiered in 1938 at the Comédie-Française; that was the original French Cantique des Cantiques.
3 Song of Songs, according to its Wikipedia article, was translated into English in 1959 and 1961, so the 1938 date is wrong.
Either, give the French titles for the premieres (with English translation in brackets if appropriate), or list both French and English as separate works. The same applies to The Enchanted (Intermezzo), Tessa (Tessa, la nymphe au cœur fidèle), The Trojan War Will Not Take Place (La guerre de Troie n'aura pas lieu whose English translation was in any case called Tiger at the Gates), Electra (Électre), The Apollo of Bellac (L'Apollon de Bellac or L'Apollon de Marsac), Sodom and Gomorrah (Sodome et Gomorrhe), The Madwoman of Chaillot (La Folle de Chaillot) and Duel of Angels  (Pour Lucrèce).
Emeraude (talk) 09:06, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dating/naming ambiguity 

message: In this article I see: "Giraudoux put the joke into his 1980 book, Murphy's Law Book Two."  This does not seem correct.  First of all, Giraudoux died in 1944.  And, the book, Murphy's Law Book Two, is listed (on amazon.com) as being by Arthur Bloch.  Any reason I should not go ahead and edit this article accordingly?  Thanks!  --Tom Tomfren (talk) 16:27, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murphy's Law, Book Two
Talk:BBC Northern Ireland

message: I would like to add Mike Gaston onto this page somehow as he has been a fairly notable person within BBC Northern Ireland but do not wish it disrupt the integrity of this page any advice and assistance with this would be welcome. Thanks
Rachend (talk) 09:29, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition to page advice 
Talk:Ulaş Bardakçı

message: == NPOV ==
Lines like: "He didn't surrender and fought to the last bullet. He was killed by the police before dawn." don't sound very neutral to me. I don't really know enough about this person to change it myself. Belovedfreak 12:46, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: that`s true, but "fought to te last bullet" is not known. Personally i haven`t seen any information about the numbers of the bullet left on gun, when he was killed. Then I removed that part, i think this article doesn`t have any problem now. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.214.121.34 (talk) 17:59, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Lines like: "He didn't surrender and fought to the last bullet. He was killed by the police before dawn." don't sound very neutral to me. I don't really know enough about this person to change it myself. Belovedfreak 12:46, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: that`s true, but "fought to te last bullet" is not known. Personally i haven`t seen any information about the numbers of the bullet left on gun, when he was killed. Then I removed that part, i think this article doesn`t have any problem now. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.214.121.34 (talk) 17:59, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:International BBC television channels

message: I miss something important information: which channel is encrypted, and which is clear (free to air)?
As I know, the only FTA international is the BBC World. But it would be useful to know surely for everybody, for every intermational BBC channels.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.44.154.178 (talk) 15:28, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Talk:UKTV

message: UKTV have a brand new logo and website redesign [] to celebrate it's 21st birthday.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jking88 (talk • contribs) 13:35, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  2013 Logo 

message: I have the new UKTV logo to upload but I can't upload it. Can anyone help me figure out how to do this? (YPSI123 (talk) 14:32, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Upload  here. --  axg ⁞⁞ talk  14:58, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

text: New accounts have some things blocked of to prevent vandalism, and yes you may email the image and I will upload it. --  axg ⁞⁞ talk  17:31, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  UKTV Logo 

message: "Closed" (in this context) seems like a Briticism to me. I'd have to call such channels "ended," "cut,"  "stopped," or "done away with." (Yes, I know the policy on different Englishes, and I don't expect anything to change. I just wanted to make a comment.) Entire companies close down or fold while branches and franchises close or close down. Cable TV channels can be dropped by a cable company if the channel still exists, but the originating company ends, cuts, or stops the channels that they've done away with. Closing a cable channel is like pronouncing "Chianti" the way Hopkins did in Silence of the Lambs, a dead giveaway that it ain't American English. Well, that's one American's opinion. Boy, do I miss alt.usage.english. 68.89.149.2 16:35, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Closed is fine. "Done away with"?? WTF are you on. It's a british company so why can't we use "Briticism"? Why should we use the Americanisms you have suggested? Honestly. 92.22.171.25 (talk) 15:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Closed"? 

message: I was thinking should we create a separate article for the channel "Really" as that is going to be a completely different channel to "UKTV Gardens" and when "Really" launches on Tuesday we could list "UKTV Gardens" as a defunct channel. What do all of you think?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.108.132.242 (talk) 12:38, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Having separate articles for UKTV Gardens and Really 

message: Scripps Network is understand to offer UKTV to BBC for £500. Source please?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PSOne12 (talk • contribs) 08:19, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC to receive £500 for UKTV 

message: I think UKTV Sport should get its own article. It’s not so relevant. But it really should. I’ll try to make the article. Anyone else up for it? TheWiiikiBeStrong (talk) 22:28, 15 November 2021 (GMT)
:Sport was shown on UKTV G2 and Dave at various points so there's some justification for an article but calling the article UKTV Sport might be confusing as readers might think that you are talking about a channel that never existed. Also do ensure that there are plenty of reliable sources in case it does go to a deletion discussion. Rillington (talk) 13:17, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  UKTV Sport split
Talk:BBC News Arabic

message: I think the image that had been used in this article is the title card for their new bulletins, and not the logo itself.
If you ask me, BBC Arabic logo is the Generic BBC logo itself, as seen from Station ID and the DOG.
122.52.78.215 (talk) 02:02, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think they are not using the Generic BBC logo (black square w/ white "B-B-C" and vice versa), but i think they only the white square w/ black "B-B-C".
210.4.42.191 (talk) 10:10, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC Arabic Logo