Talk:London Buses

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 21:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Has it ever been explained why they require this — is it aesthetically motivated, just an anachronism, or is there some other logic behind it? David Arthur 14:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is, unless sunlight reflects off them, or the light has blown.. but electronic displays have a low resolution.155.198.33.150 (talk) 12:23, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Destination blinds 

message: :Image:BusMark.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:BusMark.jpg

message: Can anyone confirm this logo :Image:BusMark.jpg is still in use on buses or anywhere else, as the replaced roundel looks absolutely crap, and I'm sure the colour is wrong looking disticntly orange. I might be imagining it, but if you look at the bottom of this map , it should be redder. MickMacNee (talk) 13:15, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I took roundel from TfL design standards. <Flrntalk> 14:01, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo

message: The two London Buses articles are not sufficiently distinct to warrant two articles. One is supposed to be more historical / general than the other, but in fact they are both broad. London Underground has only one article, so London Buses should follow. Algarve1233 (talk) 08:44, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No, London Buses doesn't mention anything earlier than 1985, when the company was formed, and goes into more detail about this period than the other article. I've moved the "London buses used in art" section there. Peter James (talk) 23:29, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on London Buses. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071116090326/http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/modesoftransport/1548.aspx to http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/modesoftransport/1548.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100123002842/http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/projectsandschemes/2373.aspx to http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/projectsandschemes/2373.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:55, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified