lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Barszcz czerwony

message: The description of this soup bears a striking resemblance to that of borscht, and I wouldn't be surprised if they were, in fact, identical. As such, I propose a merge, but I'd like to make sure that it would be reasonable first. --Jitterro 23:29, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My recollection is a little hazy, coming from a trip I made several years ago, but this sounds like the Polish name for Borshch to me.  In Poland (at least in Krakow, which is where I encountered this) there are two kinds of borshch, with the one made from beets being called 'Ukarinian Borshch'.  Given that the main Borscht article already mentions several variants, it probably does make sense to merge this is in as just another regional version. —Eldan Goldenberg (User:Eldang) 00:36, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I would seem similar and a local word/variant, and the borscht page lits barszcz as the Polish word for the soup. Epson291 08:19, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Barszcz = Borscht?

message: It doesn't look like there's much argument, so I'm going to go ahead and merge these two pages DLPanther 20:40, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging
Talk:Salang Tunnel

message: The overview says 16000 vehicles pass through the tunnel daily, or about 1 every 10 seconds, 24 hours a day. Having just been through the tunnel, this seems rather high. I would suggest more like 16000 per month! 124.199.126.233 (talk) 05:09, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vehicle traffic in tunnel 

message: The cutline for the second photo identifies it as the "Salang Tunnel entrance, 1975". It appears to be the entrance to the snow shed/gallery, with the actual tunnel portal at the far right margin. Kablammo (talk) 12:16, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second photo 

message: What is gradient through tunnel, or is it level? ----RedYellowGreen1599 (talk) 06:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gradient through tunnel?
Talk:The Pink Panther 2

message: This page really drips of insincerity. Phrases like "to the 2006 box office hit" are very biased, and contribute to this article feeling more like an advertisement than an article. If feels like it was written by a film advertiser, or for the back of a DVD cover. 69.158.161.238 23:31, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone of the article

message: Does this movie or the other one really have to do with the pink panther cartoon at all or did they just name it like that for some reason?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.187.65.182 (talk) 20:48, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pink Panther?

message: The teaser trailer says the film is called The Pink Panther 2. Bencey (talk) 15:29, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Who was the nominee for the ALMA Award? Andy García? 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 23:22, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: ALMA Award
Talk:No Reason (House)

message: I think the Diagnosis: None entry is wrong; the whole purpose of this episode was to show House diagnozing himself as hallucinating. Albmont 23:31, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, House was not the patient, Harpo was and they never found a diagnosis for him. What's the differential for hallucinations, a concussion? No. 
Blindman shady 23:41, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Harpo was a hallucination!!!  he appeared before the shooting -- in House's mind -- but the whole episode was subjective until the very end. 2600:8800:7025:7000:B109:5FAE:AEBE:EA5 (talk) 21:10, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added information that this is the season finale of season two of House, M.D. AboutUs:NickBurrus  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.38.95.59 (talk) 04:10, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season Finale 

message: "Tell Cutty ... " + "Ketamine", "No [?] Ketamine" or "I want Ketamine"?
I heard the second version the first time around, but now I'm not sure.
79.213.99.231 (talk) 20:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 3x01 seems to back up "I want Ketamine", but I've been wrong before, so I want verification this time. If you heard the same, please change the article. 79.213.99.231 (talk) 20:19, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  End quote 

message: At the beginning of the episode, Moriarty asks the team which one is House, thus implying that they had never met. In the middle of the episode, which is a hallucination, Moriarty tells House why he shot him, because House, while treating his wife, had badgered him into confessing that he cheated. This inconsistency is excusable since its in the middle of a big hallucination (and perhaps left in to hint that what is happening isn't real), but it doesn't seem to make much sense since House is eventually able to determine that everything is a hallucination by picking up on other much more subtle clues. It doesn't make much sense that he missed such a big clue that it all wasn't real. Yebellz (talk) 22:57, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The entirety of that man's story about his wife is probably untrue as it was in a hallucination. It is feasible, hence why it did not cause him to decipher the whole event was simply his imagination, but the tongue man's other symptoms, the background of the shooter (who is never caught), and anything that took place during the hallucination never actually happened. TaBrooks (talk) 13:35, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot hole 

message: Was Moriarty selected at the name of the shooter in the episode, because of the villain Professor Moriarty in the Sherlock Holmes stories by Arthur Conan Doyle, or is that a coincidence?
71.109.154.133 (talk) 21:47, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Duh 2600:8800:7025:7000:B109:5FAE:AEBE:EA5 (talk) 21:11, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moriarty and Sherlock Holmes
Talk:Kingdom of Holland

message: Would it seem harsh to claim that the Netherlands (mainly all of the Benelux area)already was a part of France before 1800? If so be it, then it was a fact in all but in writing. --82.134.28.194 (talk) 12:14, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short lived? 

message: I reinstated the previous depictions of the Holland Coa. The argument that they were replaced by historically more accurate versions doesn't hold up. See reference in the edit comment. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 03:43, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arms
Talk:4 Page Letter

message: I found :Image:4 page letter.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:16, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:4 page letter.jpg]]

message: :Image:4 page letter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 05:16, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:4 page letter.jpg
Talk:Afghanistan national football team

message: Update the head coach: it is now Ashley Westwood (footballer, born 1976). https://talksport.com/football/1634161/man-utd-academy-graduate-ashley-westwood-afghanistan-manager/
The previous manager has been expelled. https://www.khaama.com/afghanistan-national-football-team-expels-coach-ahead-of-crucial-mongolia-match/ Hnfus43 (talk) 14:57, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Have updated the article to reflect this. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:42, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 November 2023
Talk:Haidar Salim

message: May I know why in every single Biography of Afghan singers is added that s/he is either Tajik or belongs to the Tajik ethnic? Firstly, is it really necessary to mention the ethnic of a artist instead of his nationality?
Secondly, whether the artist is really Tajik or not doesn't matter to the writer of those articles but everyone is delirously categorized and stigmatised as Tajik or Persian. It's just ludicrous!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaass (talk • contribs) 20:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  totally flawed and full of racial intentions
Talk:The One I Gave My Heart To

message: The info-box on the page for the album "One in a Million" states that this single was released on 1997-08-25, as does the info-box here. Yet the first paragraph states 1997-09-16.
It also states that it was released together with "Hot Like Fire" as the final single, at least there seems to be agreement that that was on 1997-09-16. However, although the info-box lists "Hot Like Fire" as a track on this single, "The One I Gave My Heart To" itself is not! Although it is listed as a track in the "Hot Like Fire" info-box, where "Hot Like Fire" itself is not!
I mean, ... HUH???
These discrepancies/errors/inconsistencies do not add-up/make-sense and mean that one cannot be clear, let alone sure, what the correct facts are.
Could you please correct to get the facts straight (and consistent) as I came here looking for answers, not more questions!
Thankyou. 92.12.86.82 (talk) 14:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors on this (and connected) page(s).
Talk:Guatemalan Forensic Anthropology Foundation

message: This book review might be relevant.  Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:11, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book and book review
Talk:Guerrilla Army of the Poor

message: — Assignment last updated by Profmexhist (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Indigenous Latin America
Talk:Journey to the Past

message: I remember watching an Anastasia featurette, where Liz Calloway said something along the lines of her not being pretty enough or famous enough to be the speaking voice of Anastasia, so their only used her for the singing. If you can get access to a DVD copy of the film, you should find this snippet somewhere.
I also found this clip, that shows Meg Ryan taking credit for Calloway's singing around 2:20. These two anecdotes reveal a bit about what it mustve been like to be a ghost artist for a singer, which I think is interesting.--Coin945 (talk) 03:38, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Extra bits

message: Discogs is a far more reliable source than Amazon; Discogs states that the single was first released in 1997. Ellokk (talk) 23:31, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aaliyah's version release date 

message: The mention from an external source that Aaliyah was the youngest performer at the Academy Awards is incorrect. Michael Jackson was 15 when he sang "Ben" on the telecast in 1973. Jodie Foster and Johnny Whitaker were also 15 when they sang together on the 1974 telecast. Jeffswim (talk) 02:59, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aaliyah's performance at Academy Awards
Talk:Andrew Jackson Donelson

message: Restored edits made before The Mystery Man's erroneous changes.General Bradley 00:17, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Mystery Man has reverted this article to a previous version that is inaccurate and incorrect.General Bradley 13:12, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate Bio 

message: Neither Andrew Jackson Donelson (1799-1871) nor this two brothers were adopted by Andrew and Rachel Jackson. The nephew the Jacksons adopted (and that is a loose term historically) was another Andrew Jackson Donelson, whose twin brother was Thomas Jefferson Donelson. The adopted Andrew Jackson Donelson is known as Andrew Jackson Jr. (1808-1865).General Bradley (talk) 22:34, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adoption by Jacksons
Talk:Suri (flower)

message: I am completely confused about the "(flower)" disambiguation, if the text explains a variety of meanings, the damascus rose on being rather secondary... Vigilius (talk) 23:30, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [untitled]

message: Who cares about Tom Cruise's daughter? Save the irrelevant pop-cultural references for UrbanDictionary... 18.235.1.59 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 09:57, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [untitled]
Talk:Sikandar Khan Lodi

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 15:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition
Talk:Newmarket, New Zealand

message: The Two-Double-Seven article was marked for speedy deletion earlier today, but another editor changed the speedy delete to a prod. It appears that individual shopping malls are marginal in terms of having their own articles in Wikipedia. I suggest merging the article into this one as a compromise.-gadfium 23:40, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd disagree "with a marginal in general" statement. Generally, I vote for these articles (individual shopping centres) to stay as they are. They may be prosaic in many ways, but they are certainly a major feature in the lives of many people working and shopping there. However, until more data is added, I'd not oppose a merge, and to turn this into a redirect. MadMaxDog 01:48, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I fully support a merge, as the mall article in its current state does not have sufficient information to warrant an independent article. According to WP:CORP, a business is notable enough for its own article, "If the organization has been the subject of multiple non-trivial, reliable published works whose source is independent of the organization itself." The Two-Double-Seven article doesn't have anything even close to that, so until/unless such sources can be provided, the information should be merged. If sources become available later, a separate article can be easily re-established. --Elonka 22:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

text: From what I've seen I suspect every single westfield shopping centre was tagged for speedy deletion, with a lot of them being deleted. Currently a bunch of them are listed on Deletion Review. I'm certain sources out there exist for them. Mathmo Talk 16:07, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've corrected the link to Deletion Review above.-gadfium 19:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from Two-Double-Seven
Talk:Bălţi/to do

message: *write the two stub sections: 
**political persecutions and demortations that took part in or through the city in 1940-1941 and 1945-1989
**hotels and lodging fasilities in general, e.g. can something be rented, etc.
*add photos and maps:
**fix here the two photos that exist in the Romanian wikipedia
***Primaria_Balti.gif (City Hall (Primǎria))   
***Image:balti_city.gif (another image)   
**add the coat of arms and the flag of the city or its center
**add a couple maps
**add 1-2 more photos with present-day general view of the city
**add photos for every architecture item (maybe even write a short article for each), at least 1 photo for each, put them nice in lines by 4 in the architecture section
**add photos for specific sections:
***communist persecutions
***persecutions of Jews
***Soviet concentration camp
***railway and inter-city-coach stations, airports
***hotels
***city hall
***university (also pictures of the same buildings from 1930s)
***some (1-2) high schools
**pictures/photos for the history section:
***Ringalia (can we find one?)
***Grigore III Ghica
***the Panaite brothers
***Cantemir (?)
***the Russian tsar mentioned (?)
***some around 1900 photo(s)
***some around 1930 photo(s)
***some WWII photos (be sure to show all armies)
***some neighborhood with Soviet-styles box-buildings 
**2-3 photos of the landscapes surrounding the city
**at least one picture from each of the main parks, 2-3 from the Bishopric park —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dc76 (talk • contribs) 23:35, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Grant Unto Him Eternal Rest

message: I heard that this episode was originally inted to be the first of the series, but, as it requires a deal character humour that could only be attained by seeing more episodes, was saved for the final episode of season one.  Can anybody find a source?--Dark Green 23:41, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First of Series 
Talk:Khan Abdul Jabbar Khan

message: The correct and actual name is Dr. Khan sab Mhaseeb88 (talk) 06:00, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @ 223.123.116.33 (talk) 11:02, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Khan sab
Talk:Rahimullah Yusufzai

message: seems to be a conservative Muslim who wants WP to be rewritten by themself. I added the following to their Talk page, meaning the other reversion may have been done by an English-only editor (I used Urban Dictionary and Google Translate).
"== Adding profanity ==
In addition to your other unconstructive editing, you have added Hindi profanity to the  WP articles on Pakistani journalist Rahimullah Yusufzai and conservative Pakistani preacher Zakir Naik. Perhaps their articles are not agreeing enough with your tastes. You may be trying to encourage Indo-Pak strife. Grow up and stop hating the West.--Quisqualis (talk) 02:13, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP editor has added profanity to this article (16 April 2017) and another (16 April 2017) 
Talk:Pashto media

message: This article is written in a way as if Pakistan is a country of Pashtun people, but it's not, Pakistan is a Punjabi dominated country. Pashtuns in Pakistan only have one single TV station that just began airing for the first time in Pakistan's history in 2004. However, there are at least 20 or more Urdu TV channels. Afghanistan is the nation of Pashtuns, the Pashtuns there are the dominated group. Generally speaking, all the population of Afghanistan speak Pashto, meaning not only Pashtuns speak Pashto but others groups also speak and understand it. Pashto is the official language of Afghanistan. In Pakistan, Urdu is the official language of that country, English is a second language, Punjabi is the most spoken language there. Most Pashtuns in Pakistan are forced to speak all these non-Pashto languages.--Khan1982 22:06, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs work

message: Hello
This article is not balanced. The writer tries to exaggerate pashto media in Pakistan. Its not very researched article and very subjective. Please revise and update this article otherwise its misleading.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.245.30.101 (talk) 09:09, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Article is not balance and accurate
Talk:Khyal Muhammad

message: * Now placing of these Tags related to Citations about this Pashtun Legendry singer is clearly a joke by LineofWisdom. If a Pashtun or an Afghan has doubts about the greatness of this singer then that person isn't entitled to call himself a Pashtun. Though I am not going to blank these Tags, I would still bring it on the record that you have deliberately Tagged some of my created articles to level the score against me primarily because I am not allowing you to delete the names of rival clan members from another article on Marwat which I co created. Carry on with these destructive edit wars and I will respond in the same way. -- MARWAT  05:27, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As (especially) the creator of page or even any other editor has failed to provide the references  / citations, despite many days have passed, I have tagged the artilce to be cleaned-up to meet the Wikipedia's requirement. It would be enormously appreciated, if somoene could refer and cite the claims. So we could have the article. --LineofWisdom (talk) 09:50, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up 
Talk:List of Pashtuns

message: The quality of this list would be considerably improved by categorising the people in it into groups based on what they are famous for, and to add a line or two about them. Try looking at most other list of famous people within a certain ethnic group. JdeJ 00:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a category Pashtun people which lists all Pashtun people, so why do we also need this list? -- Behnam (talk) 10:11, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes we don't need this list. It is full of unsourced entries and lots of them violate WP:BLPCAT. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 09:54, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this list necessary? 

message: 11 random names were added to the military category under Pakistan Armed Forces 
* Noman Bashir
* Iqbal Khan
* Yusuf Khan
* Farrakh Khan
* F. S. Lodhi
* M. Rahim Khan
* Azam Khan
* Salahuddin Tirmizi
* Zahid Ali Akbar Khan
* Khalilur Rehman
* Syed Mujtaba Tirmizi
by the following:  
User:Sayedadnanshah4 (Now Banned, sockpuppet of User:ChutendraChodi) 
User:Lelolalon (Banned)  
User:ChutendraChodi (Now Banned, sockpuppet of User:Sayedadnanshah4) 
Be wary of these accounts when they make edits on this page.  RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 07:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with Armed Forces Category - Pakistan
Talk:Phytophthora

message: I am looking for a peer review of Sudden Oak Death - Discussion. Would appreciate comments. (a Mentally Efficient Loonies And Nice Insane Elephants creation 21:20, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

message: On 3 February 2007 User:Werothegreat changed
| regnum = Stramenapila  	to  	| domain = Eukaryota
and | phylum = Heterokontophyta or Oomycota 	to 	| unranked_phylum = Chromista without discussion or citing authority for the change. --Bejnar 23:45, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hierarchical nomenclature

message: The article states that Phytophthora infect dicotyledons primarily, yet the only photograph shows a leek, which is a monocot.  Can anyone supply a photo of a common victim, such as an ericaceous plant?Carlaclaws (talk) 02:17, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Added photo: Sudden Oak Death caused by Phytophthora ramorum to article.  I like the leek photo. --Bejnar (talk) 17:31, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

text: I like the leek photo, too, and I think it should remain, but I thought a picture of a woody dicot would be very helpful.  Thanks.Carlaclaws (talk) 23:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leek Photograph