Talk:Gleaning

message: I'm going to add in the modern times section that gleaning is not the same as dumpster diving because dumpster diving is mentioned in the "see also" section (which I think is appropriate) and while it is related I think it should be clarified that they are not the same. Drworm921 (talk) 18:08, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Violation of NPOV, and irrelevant to gleaning as an activity. Deleted all.
Extra information could be added on supermarket bin raids and countermeasures.
Inserted Christian gleaning programme as 'See Also' link.
--TresRoque 00:09, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biblical References and Advocacy 

message: The bible and Mishnah are viewed by many (though not all) secular scholars as a legitimate supplement to archelogical findings when trying to support claims about Jewish culture in the ancient world. As such they are appropriate citation sources.  Egfrank 20:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoration of biblical references - explanation provided 

message: * 
*
*Xx236 (talk) 14:59, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You still does not provide a link to source which claimed about  existance of specifically Gleaning '-'is the act of collecting leftover crops from farmers' fields after they have been commercially harvested or on fields where it is not economically profitable to harvest. at USSR.
Moreover you have not provide a ref about that specifically Gleaning was punished under Soviet Law "7/8". I hope you will be able to find such sources soon. Thank youJo0doe (talk) 17:39, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

text: None of above as RS (no scholars, no Gleaning, No Law 7/8 for Gleaning). Where Practice of Gleaning (as described in article) appeared at all above and in USSR specifically.Thank you, awaiting for RS for mentioned in article. Thank youJo0doe (talk) 16:08, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

text: Can't found accounts for Gleaning in USSR, not about specifically andthixwillendthiz discusion preciselly mentioned Gleaning in 7/8 Law. Regional Russian court which was created in 1937 passed through comments (again no Gleaning) over 1932 Legal act- hardly a RS. I'm looking for RS source(s) which claimed what Gleaning ( the act of collecting leftover crops from farmers' fields after they have been commercially harvested or on fields where it is not economically profitable to harvest) was existed or at least allowed before 7/8 Law and later specifically punished through it Law. Please be pricise in facts. Thank youJo0doe (talk) 08:14, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Your question is a Western one. There was no law in Communist countries. Only party members had some rights, until they were removed from the party. Xx236 (talk) 10:21, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So you quit attempt to find a RS about existing of gleaning in USSR and mentioned such in 7/8 Law?Jo0doe (talk) 17:03, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links confirming that gleaning was punished 

message: Dear friends it's wrong link - http://www.indiana.edu/~workshop/colloquia/papers/gardner_paper2.pdf- 
;This paper proposes a simple game theoretic model of those cycles.
To explain the repression cycle in the USSR, we begin with a simple 2x2 game, two
players with two strategies each. See figure 2.
* History not game
Please find a RS about Gleaning in USSR and it's punishing under 7/8 Law. Thank youJo0doe (talk) 16:12, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2x2 Game

message: "Game theory is a branch of applied mathematics that is used in the social sciences (most notably economics), biology, engineering, political science, international relations, computer science (mainly for artificial intelligence), and philosophy. Game theory attempts to mathematically capture behavior in strategic situations, in which an individual's success in making choices depends on the choices of others." Bobanni (talk) 04:43, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article models the cycles of repression in the soviet union including collectivization. As  a starting point it uses as an example the law that criminalizes gleaning.  Please read the reference.Bobanni (talk) 08:02, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So you was unable to comrahend the difference between history and games?Pitty - 
* you try to add information that is irrelevant on the grounds that "it is verifiable, so it should be in." 
While in regards to you Pavel Polyan ref - it's bad faith editing - as far as no Gleaning no Criminilizing at under 7/8 law at book  does not appeared. I hope you'll fix you possible mistakes by yourself .Thank youJo0doe (talk) 08:37, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Game theory]] 

message: this has nothing to do with actual agricultural gleaning in Ancient Middle East and Medieval Europe, just a catchy name with Christian connotations adopted by the charities in question. Nothing wrong with discussing it in this article in a separate section as cultural homage of sorts, but not good that it seems just mixed into the main text. 173.220.69.141 (talk) 15:52, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Gleaning" of excess restaurant food should be separated out 

message: From here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gleaners
There is a better image: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:JEAN-FRAN%C3%87OIS_MILLET_-_Las_Espigadoras_%28Museo_de_Orsay,_1857._%C3%93leo_sobre_lienzo,_83.5_x_110_cm%29.jpg
We should use it, as it is higher quality and much more accurate to what the painting should look like. The image on this page has some light reflection of the left.
--71.176.135.195 (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better Image for "The Gleaners" 

message: "In nineteenth century England, gleaning was a legal right for cottagers. In a small village the sexton would often ring a church bell at eight o'clock in the morning and again at seven in the evening to tell the gleaners when to begin and end work.[20] This legal right effectivily ended after a legal case in 1788." 
Ok so in the 19th century in England Gleaning was a legal right of cottagers. But this legal right ended after a legal case in the 18th century before it started? Ya sorry guys this math seems off. 198.45.184.25 (talk) 04:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could someone please explain the math 

message: Nothing in Mark 2:23-28 indicates that the wheat in question was "leftover", so how is this gleaning and not harvesting, grazing, or even theft? --Khajidha (talk) 11:19, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not. I've zapped it. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 11:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is an example of the allowance under Jewish customs that people can forage for their immediate need but cannot take any extra to eat later. This concept is also found in medieval customs i.e. peasants could gather only the wood laying on the King's  ground they could carry in their arms. Travelers could only eat apples off a tree one at a time etc. Septagram (talk) 04:49, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you're referring to this - that's not "gleaning". --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 14:01, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark 2:23