lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:RMS Oceanic (1899)

message: 4'-7" guns? I presume it meant 4x7". And just how many Captains has she? I presume the civilian is her Master...   Clairfy? Trekphiler 20:59 & Trekphiler 21:03, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 4'-7" guns?

message: Does anyone know the coordinates of where the ship ran aground? --RThompson82 (talk) 23:08, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There is only one wreck marked on the chart at 60°07.00'N 1°57.70'W.  Admiralty chart 3283, Shetland Islands South Sheet. Can anyone confirm if this is her? Martin of Sheffield (talk) 10:49, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've found her in the official database and am updating the article. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 13:09, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Wreck site coordinates?

message: I can see the work that has been going into providing conversions for her speed, but is there any sense in giving MPH?  Ship speeds are measured in knots, and for metricated countries I suppose they will want km/h, but who ever uses MPH for a ship speed? Martin of Sheffield (talk) 23:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speed
Talk:Castleford

message: In the 4th paragraph of the Economy section it mentions several proposed developments, saying at the end 'Note this has been cancelled due to government cutbacks.'
The library devlopment is going ahead.  It has been closed and relocated to temporary space.  I'm going to add this, with an attempt at references.
Wakefield MDC page, Local paper
Dannman (talk) 13:50, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development 

message: Well, the new library & museum building is finished and open.  So I've changed this from a future project & added a bit of info.  I'll declare an interest here; I've worked on the website linked to (Friends Of Castleford Library).  The local council site isn't very good, and it's always a problem finding anything on it, which is why I haven't used that as a ref.
Dannman (talk) 14:29, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development - Library 
Talk:Britain Yearly Meeting

message: the Note:"." has been removed.  As both organisations use the abbreviation and have it within the texts of their articles, it is good to avoid any possible confusion by restoring this text to the top of the Britain Yearly Meeting article, in my view. Vernon White . . . Talk  23:04, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The comment from the removal points out that since BYM doesn't redirect here, they felt it could be removed.  I'm inclined to agree; that template is generally used for pages that have redirects to them, that might cause confusion. --Ahc (talk) 05:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that was me :D. I'm not really fussed either way, but I was trying to make the hatnote into a common template ( tends only to be used where a normal one doesn't fit the needs); I saw that in my opinion the only one the would really fit would be , and that BYM didn't redirect here (it's a disambiguation page). Thanks very much, Drum guy (talk) 20:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Abbreviation "BYM"

message: I do not think the section on National Quaker Week is a neutral encyclopaedic entry.  I personally doubt really whether National Quaker Week is really notable enough to have an entry at all on this page, however even if it is, I feel it should be written in neutral language and mention that National Quaker Week is a controversial move that not all local Quaker meetings or Friends in Britain support.  I also think the phrase to encourage Quakers to drop their traditional modesty and "to let their souls sing" is particularly inappropriate - Friends traditionally have been very open about their beliefs, with their plain dress, plain language, breaking up church services to preach publicly about their beliefs.  Some people may feel that modern Friends do not talk about their faith enough, although this is an opinion, not fact.  I think this section needs completely re-writing.
Ceiriog (talk) 17:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Quaker Week 
Talk:Calvillo

message: This article has been added to Category:Municipalities of Aguascalientes by Eagle (talk) (desk) at 21:15, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

message: The demographic section was unsourced. It gives some specific percentages, but without any source. The INEGI doesn't ask for race in the census. Moretti80 (talk) 03:41, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Demographics
Talk:Asientos

message: This article has been added to Category:Municipalities of Aguascalientes by Eagle (talk) (desk) at 21:15, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Aftermath (novella)

message: How do you find a reliable source for an unpublished work? You probably have to get information directly from the author, maybe his/her agent, maybe his/her friends/family...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.95.232.3 (talk) 18:15, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I've found a reference for the existence of the manuscript, but it is apparent that the only way to verify the plot synopsis is to actually look at the papers held in the special collections at a university library in Maine. Who knows whether this would also verify the history of the work (i.e. when it was written). 69.95.238.4 (talk) 20:49, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced Template 

message: A short story written by a young talented writer who eventually made it into a comic book still unpublished. He went by the name AXEL only to hide his true idenity using the name of the hero of the Aftermath Axel Zen who defeated and destroyed the dictatans a tribe based on destruction of Axel which along with the other parentless children where the only hope for land of Xen.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.0.43.183 (talk) 21:21, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Aftermath
Talk:Sweet Bird of Youth

message: There are multiple errors in this article. I stopped reading it. I have no desire to change anything due to the self-appointed attack dogs that get their jollies "reverting" someone's work into the dust-bin. So be it. Let this article be error-ridden.Shemp Howard, Jr. (talk) 01:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple errors in article

message: Where is the section describing the plot of the play and film?  I'm constantly dismayed that most Wikipedia film pages contain a nag that the plot should be reduced so as to be nearly useless in discussing the film, but then to actually have no plot beyond the opening paragraph of the article is quite extreme.  There WAS a plot section here a year or two ago, until someone at 95.49.242.50 vaporized it. 24.57.210.141 (talk) 23:34, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've put the plot synopsis back in. This should not have been removed in the first place... --Morn (talk) 12:49, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot? 

message: I'm confused; are we talking about making an actual reference to the IBDB page that's linked to at the bottom of the article? Surely the information correlates on its own… Absurdist1968 (talk) 08:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed for Broadway history paragraph
Talk:Jesús María, Aguascalientes

message: This article has been added to Category:Municipalities of Aguascalientes by Eagle (talk) (desk) at 21:15, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shuri-ryū

message: Good to see that this page is developing along quite nicely. U238 21:39, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Who is formally considered the founder of Shuri-ryu, and roughly when?  Who exactly first used the name Shuri-ryu? Some of the links at the end of the article say Shuri-ryu was created through the collaboration of Choki Motobu and Tung Gee Hsing, while the article would lead you to believe that it was Robert Trias who first founded it after returning to the States. Can someone clear this up? Bradford44 04:34, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Founder of Shuri-ryu?

message: I knew Robert Trias. He was not Hispanic. He was Greek. 174.240.253.255 (talk) 04:03, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trias ethnic background
Talk:Semper ubi sub ubi

message: Removed the line "A similiar scholastic Latin pun that grew in popularity in the late 90s' is praeda voca, which students use to mean "booty call."" This pun is actually not at all similar, since it's based on the meaning of the words involved, not on a homophone of the translation of the words. I've heard hundreds of Latin jokes like the "praeda voca", and especially considering that no source is cited to substantiate its being any more noteworthy or related to "semper ubi" than the countless other phrases of the same nature, it doesn't belong here. Other jokes based on the sound of Latin words or translations of Latin words might, though again, notability is required. -Silence 21:41, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Pabellón de Arteaga

message: This article has been added to Category:Municipalities of Aguascalientes by Eagle (talk) (desk) at 21:15, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Baháʼí Faith/Archive 7

message: Archived 3 DEC 2005  LambaJan 21:53, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

message: What happened to the rather nice symbol of the nine-pointed star?? Sufisticated 23:26, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symbol went missing 

message: Starting a new section, as discussion above is getting convoluted.  Just wondering, where *are* these links to the article on criticisms and controversies in the Baha'i Faith?  I was just about to make the point to Dawud that criticism isn't hidden if anyone interested in looking at it can easily link to it from this main article - then I found that I *couldn't* find an easy link here, and I think that the "See also" section is a bit dated and tangential.  PaulHammond 23:48, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's in the Bahá'í apologetics article that is linked in the "See also" section.  I don't disagree that the name is bad, and could be renamed, or a new one started just with the criticisms.  -- Jeff3000 01:27, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: hmmm, somehow through all the reverting, the link got deleted, I just added it back. -- Jeff3000 01:29, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to criticisms?
Talk:Rincón de Romos

message: This article has been added to Category:Municipalities of Aguascalientes by Eagle (talk) (desk) at 21:15, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Baude Cordier

message: dates of birth and death?  (At the least century he lived in?) RJFJR 21:55, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Did I miss it or is there a reference in the sentence on the rondeau "Amans" to "but see below" without a "below" to be seen?
Shlishke (talk) 19:48, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amans: "But see below": what "below"
Talk:San Francisco de los Romo

message: This article has been added to Category:Municipalities of Aguascalientes by Eagle (talk) (desk) at 21:15, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of programs broadcast by Anime Network

message: Please don't add "possible ratings" for shows. tregoweth 21:58, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Ratings

message: does this list only have shows shown on the network or the VOD one as well. Because on VOD I use to watch a show called A M Driver. 6:45, 5 June 2009  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.241.104.66 (talk)  
:The list really has little to no purpose. Bit'X was shown at the same time as AM Driver, but was dropped for lack of dubbing. Some of the shows in the list are no longer even available for TAN to air as they do not have the rights to them. It makes you wonder if this list even serves any purpose, or if it can be deleted as it is not very informative other than they could have shown anything in the ADV collection, and can still get anything to show depending on what licenses are acquired or run out. shadzar-talk 22:21, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Shows
Wikipedia talk:Blocking policy/Cancelled poll

message: Foobar, don't try to stop people commenting when they vote, please. It's bad enough holding a poll on a major policy change, but trying to stop people from saying why they hold the view that they do 
is not appropriate. SlimVirgin (talk) 11:06, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your input. You've made lots of comments here. Nobody else but you is calling it a "vote", by the way -- Wikipedia isn't a democracy. Since we're already discussing this elsewhere, I don't see any need to fragment the discussion. --FOo 21:50, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Allow people to comment
Talk:Stannie Get Your Gun

message: User Chadbryant is removing the Trivia edit which states that this episode is an attack on the National Rifle Association.  He is doing so with no justification other than the fact that the original addition was put into place by a Wikipedia user that he apparantly has a personal problem with. This episode WAS a satire on the NRA (or at least portions of it were), and the Trivia addition should stand.  Chadbryant has no authority to remove it -- he has a history of claiming "vandalism."  However I defy ANYONE on Wikipedia, Chadbryant included, to try to successfully argue that the addition was vandalism in any form.  This is a stupid call, and I know something about stupid calls! RSPW Coaster
:Chadbryant has been reported to Wikipedia for abuse and blatant violation of the rules.  Both of you need to calm the fuck down. Doctor Strangelove
::Report me? I'm already reported! Woooooo! Chadbryant 01:15, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Great! That'll make it a lot easier to ban you later. 01:46, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: User Chadbryant bocked for 24 hrs for breaking the three revert rule. ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t • @ 02:50, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  I don't know what his specific problem was, but it apparantly had something to do with another Wikipedia user. At any rate, his editing of this particular entry was unnecessary and unwarranted.  Maybe this will give him something to think about.  By the way, while I think he was correct in changing NRA to National Rifle Association (as I just did to RSPW Coaster's at the beginning of this talk page) that still doesn't justify his behavior.  And, as you can see, he is ...or rather, WAS... all but taunting people to get him banned.  Now that he has his wish, maybe he'll change his ways; looking at his talk page, and his history, I doubt it, but stranger things certainly have happened on here.  ~~ Doctor Strangelove 18:17, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia & Neutrality Flagging 

message: Are we sure that Annie get your gun is a song?  I think the title is most likely a reference to the Broadway Musical Annie Get Your Gun. SirChuckB 07:10, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:WINT (AM)

message: WELW is to become WINT ("Integrity radio") on March 31. Unfortunately, a WINT page already exists, a redirect, so a simple article move won't be possible; there'll have to be content moved between pages. Mapsax (talk) 13:45, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. For the history of the WELW talk page up to this point, go here. Mapsax (talk) 12:07, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Just to clarify, what Mapsax is saying here is that he attempted to perform a cut-and-paste move, which was reverted.  The link to the "history of the WELW talk page" is not only unnecessary, but also misleading, and should be disregarded.  The edit history of this talk page is fully intact.  Levdr1lp / talk 15:54, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It is now. It wasn't before. My comments above are obsolete now but were still written so I restored them. Mapsax (talk) 16:04, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  You aren't "restoring" anything.  You're adding comments made during your attempted cur-and-paste move at the "WINT" talk page.  That attempted cut-and-paste move was reverted, so in effect, you're making the above comments on this talk page for the first time.  You might want to strikethrough your above comments to avoid creating additional confusion.  Levdr1lp / talk 16:26, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree, since the two topmost comments appeared together at one time. But strikethrough is fair enough. Mapsax (talk) 16:32, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  The point is you originally posted those comments to a different talk page with a different edit history; you added them to this page later, including a misleading edit history link.  This isn't subjective.  This isn't something with which you "agree" or "disagree".  You attempted a cur-and-paste move.  It was reverted (including the associated talk page).  Posting those same comments here w/o providing clarification creates confusion over just what happened here.  Levdr1lp / talk 17:05, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: For whichever page they are relevant, they, and by extension this whole section, need to be preserved together just like this, strikethrough notwithstanding. The point is that a comment of mine got deleted without my permission, and that wasn't justifiable according to the points in the list at WP:TPO. Mapsax (talk) 14:03, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  This section, in is original form, is preserved within the edit history of Talk:WINT.  You can't expect another editor such as myself to move around your comments when trying to fix your attempted cut-and-paste move.  Wikipedia requires attribution, and there was nothing even remotely justified in separating nine years of this article's edit history from its content (the small link you provided was not nearly sufficient).  Levdr1lp / talk 15:40, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  WELW changing calls
Talk:Petar II Petrović-Njegoš

message: There is no Montenegrin literature, it should be only Serbian as it was original in this text. 77.243.23.214 (talk) 11:32, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 July 2021 

message: It's "Montenegrin", not "Montenegrian" 62.4.55.104 (talk) 16:15, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar
Category talk:Portals

message: Can anyone add my new Cosmology portal? Link: (Portal:Cosmology).
thanks... Tetra quark (talk) 16:17, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You've already added it to some categories; that's the effect of the [[Category:<category name>]] lines at the bottom of the Portal:Cosmology page. -- John of Reading (talk) 17:05, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I didn't know I had done it already :p thanks Tetra quark (talk) 17:38, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help 

message: My first Wiki "Chat"
I found you. 
Bottom to top to unlock the map.
Trying to THINQ DIFFERENT. SJ. 
Be back soon. Diff IP next.
T.ME ---- HP Intel  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.201.223.250 (talk) 22:09, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  IN PORTAL
Talk:Sunday Bloody Sunday

message: I believe its more sound to call the third chord an E minor 7 chord.
The current labeling G6 is inadequate because there is no B. It is very uncommon to find the third omitted from a 6 chord.
If it were labeled as an E minor 7 chord the fifth would be omitted, the fifth is not a necessary note in this chord.
I would be happy to elaborate further if you don't understand.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.243.119.250 (talk) 20:31, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Provide a reliable source to verify your claims. The current information is sourced to the official music sheet as distributed by Universal Music. "Believing" or "thinking" that it is different is complete original research. Given that the current information is sourced to the official notation as provided by the record label, you will have a hell of a job proving otherwise. Melicans (talk, contributions) 20:40, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening riff
Talk:1991 World Series

message: I don't think there is a citation needed to say "in arguably the best baseball game ever played."  A citation WOULD be needed if it were worded "in the best baseball game ever played," but you don't need to cite anything if all you're saying is that, literally, "one could argue" something.  Kaiserkarl13 (talk) 00:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If it says "arguably" then we need to say who argues it. Kingturtle (talk) 11:30, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was the one who left the comment above about Twins bias, but it has been rectified (and then some!) by some more thorough game recaps by Maestroh. Thanks! BJ Nemeth 23:17, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening heading

message: Totally omitted is that all  7 games were won by the home team. Also the Domed Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome was very noisy - a helpful factor to the Twins.  Was this a factor in the decision a few years later that Assigned World Series Home field advantage to the league Winning the All Star Game. 
Wfoj3 (talk) 13:43, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home Field Advantage
Talk:Chōjun Miyagi

message: What's a hight school? "Okinawa police work, hight schools"
:high school is a lower level of education most people complete in first world countries User5802 19:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: No article on him exists anybody have the knowledge to create one?  User5802 01:50, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article on Gogen Yamaguchi 

message: Did Chojun Miyagi found ronin goju-ryu? Ronin goju-ryu appears to be a modern system or association of martial artists.User5802 01:51, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ronin goju ryu 

message: This article both says he was born on April 25 and on April 27. Which is it. This has to be corrected. --Orri Tómasson (talk) 03:06, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Day of birth 
Talk:Dragon Ash

message: Anybody have this in ENG? Also what does he mean by pinchrunner?
:I don't think this song is available in English, but you can find the lyrics and translation here. And by "pinchrunner", he might be referring to the Japanese novel The Pinch Runner Memorandum. Bencze Gyenge 13:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shizuka na hibi no kaidan wo 

message: i wasnt sure where to ask this ? but i wanted to know where i could find eng lyrics for see you in a flash,crush the window, and stay gold any help would be much appreciated  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryugas death note (talk • contribs) 22:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  DRAGON ASH lyrics 

message: Commenting out Music Video section.  It's not a common element to other bands, Japanese or otherwise, and only succeeds in cluttering up the page.  If no arguments in it's favor have been posted on the Discussion page by March 2011, I will remove it completely.Sutematsu (talk) 01:10, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music Video Section 

message: The discography for this band is quite extensive. It might be better to have a separate page for it entirely.  Will look at doing this soon if no one else decides to first. Sutematsu (talk) 01:10, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate Dragon Ash Discography Page 

message: Please do not add every applicable sub-genre, Template:Infobox musical artist states it should "aim for generality". See Template:Infobox musical artist#genre.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2804:14C:7588:2C4:9C76:7D0A:A2AD:E2CF (talk) 03:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 

message: Part of good encyclopedia writing is to reduce the detail and retain only the most important elements. To that end, I removed a bunch of stuff which I felt was clogging the article with unnecessary detail. Some of the removed material was off-topic, having to do with individual members of Dragon Ash rather than the whole band. Other removed material was trivial, for instance the names of B-sides. I also removed side project works as off-topic, and a list of hidden tracks as trivial. I removed a list of songs "inspired by" per WP:No original research.
If someone wants to restore parts of this material, the WP:ONUS is on them to show that the material is worthy of inclusion. Binksternet (talk) 22:25, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unimportant stuff removed