lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Marian dogmas

message: I cant find any proof for the claim that "The perptual virginity of Mary" is a church dogma. I've heard something about an early dialogue between saint Jerome and someone else who disscused this, but i cant find anything that says it's a dogma. There is a feast i Russia namned Pokrov, where "TPVoM" is named - so maybe it's just dogma in the Eastern church (even if thats sounds strange?)
:Dr Ludwig Ott's authoritative Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma states: "Also after the Birth of Jesus Mary remained a Virgin." --anon 17:21, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The perptual virginity of Mary? 

message: The article currently states: "After giving birth to Christ, Mary did have sexual relations," and "In the little time that Joseph was still around after the birth of and they had several more children."  Certainly some people believe these assertions, but they don't belong in an article that presents the Roman Catholic Church's Marian dogmas.
The article also says that: "Mary did break her vow by the grace of God."  The writer seems to mean that God gave Mary a free pass to have sex but remain a virgin.  That really needs a citation, because I've never heard anything like it.  The RC Church teaches that Mary was really and truly a virgin her whole life, and other people believe she had sex and bore children, but as far as I know, no one teaches that she had sex, but God was okay with it, so we call her a virgin anyway.  Without a citation, this statement should go.
Uncleflorence 03:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perpetual Virginity 

message: A couple of issues I have:
"None are accepted within Protestant communities except perhaps in some Anglo-Catholic traditions."
I'm pretty sure the "The Mother of God" dogma is accepted almost universally by Christians including protestants.
"It is not only essential in Marian Theology but also in the Theology of Christ. For if Mary was not Mother of God, then Jesus was in fact not God."  
That is not only biased, but doesn't make sense.  One could believe that Jesus was God but Mary wasn't his mother.
I'll let someone else address them or I can.Akubhai 20:02, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The proclamation of a dogma by the church authorities goes together with the publication of a text.  This text, in its integrality, concerns the definition of the dogma.  I'm quite sure that NO protestant communities accept this integral text, only at the most parts of it.  Thus they do not accept the dogma, as it is defined. Stijn Calle 22:33, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues
Talk:Mike Mularkey

message: Mike Mularkey once called my high school to complain about a remark on our morning announcements he disagreed with.  Would this be considered "original research" and not OK to put in the article?  I'm going to see if I can find a mention about it in a local newspaper or the school bulletin.
-Tom I'm a Douche Morrisey
:Yes, this is original research because it can't be verified. RyguyMN 05:53, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Complaint

message: It looks like someone is consistently editing out the negative aspects of Mularkey's coaching career while adding in only positives. Also, the comments about his son's drug arrest was removed. Could it be Mularkey himself?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.67.131.156 (talk) 19:41, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selective editing 
Talk:Fifty Fifty (Pakistani TV series)

message: To the previous poster: Great contribution, but please keep in mind that you're posting encyclopedia level entries here. Personal opinions have to be kept aside :)Cyberian 17:10, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I'm from England and believe I have a idea about comedy shows if interested please contact me 86.19.145.112 (talk) 00:52, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  About tv programme
Talk:University of Northampton (13th century)

message: I understood that the reason for the closure of Northampton's original university was to do with support for Simon de Montfort's rebellion, not because of any perceived threat to (the University of?) Oxford. Matthew 17:19, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The first reference added to this article used cite web format. The next six references, added by now-blocked User:D A R C 12345, did not use templates so I propose changing them to citation templates for consistency. TSventon (talk) 23:33, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference format 

message: I have added a longer quotation from Henry III's 1265 decree, including "we by the advice of our great men, firmly order that there shall henceforth be no University in our said town, and that you shall not allow any students to remain there otherwise than was customary before the creation of the said University" and removed a citation needed tag. I think a citation is still needed for the claim that the decree had to be repealed by the Privy Council in 2005 to allow the then University College Northampton to gain university status. TSventon (talk) 14:43, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal Decree that banned the establishment of a university in Northampton
Talk:Colonial war

message: I'm going to put a peer review request on this page. Then hopefully we can enlist the help of other Wikipedians and turn this into a good article! Rusty2005 17:22, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, this deserves a much more elaborate article. I made added some small edits and extra paragraph spacing. Ve3 22:09, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: Do we really need that list at the bottom with all possible permutations? Can't we just say that colonial war involves the conflict between colonists, foreign armies, and indigenous peoples? Would look better in my opinion. Rusty2005 23:06, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, we don't really. I made a small paragraph that summerizes the concept, with a couple of examples. Ve3 23:17, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I've chucked in a couple more examples for good measure. Have you seen the new mitrailleuse page btw? Looks prety good! Rusty2005 23:26, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes, I saw it- a impressive effort. Was a bit shocked at first, but it does look pretty good. I think we need a different wording for the introduction of this article though. A 'type of warfare' to me normally a method of fighting (e.g. chemical warfare) rather then a type of even that occurs. I suppose this is different just different angles on the meaning of 'war' though. Ve3 23:40, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Types of colonial war 

message: :https://www.newyorker.com/news/essay/the-war-in-ukraine-is-a-colonial-war Xx236 (talk) 12:58, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: https://voxukraine.org/en/the-last-colonial-war-in-europe-or-why-ukraine-cannot-surrender/ Xx236 (talk) 07:14, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

text: https://cepa.org/imperial-russia-declares-war-on-colonialism/ Xx236 (talk) 07:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

text: https://www.ncl.ac.uk/press/articles/latest/2022/03/commentthecolonialhistoryofukraine/, https://geographical.co.uk/geopolitics/geopolitics/item/4299-ukraine-invasion-russia-s-colonial-war Xx236 (talk) 07:31, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

text: https://www.e-flux.com/journal/125/453868/the-case-against-the-russian-federation/ Xx236 (talk) 07:33, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The War in Ukraine is a Colonial War
Talk:Delfino Pescara 1936

message: Hello, I was just watching a Serie A match between Pescara(home) and Chievo(away) which ended 0:2 (away win).
What I usually do is come to Wikipedia to learn something more about the clubs.
This time, I noticed that the colors were opposite from what it said here on Wikipedia they should be - i.e., Chievo was the away team and wore yellow uniforms with blue sleeves (I checked their page and it says those are their home colors) and Pescara wore blue with white stripes (again, this page right here says those are their away colors).
So, what's going on?
Cheers.
WPIsTransient (talk) 16:09, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong colors? 

message: hi, the home kit is white-light blue stripes.... the away kit is total red with white-light blue details... and the third kit is blue with white-light blue details... PLEASE see the italian page and correct it... thanks... bye--93.151.78.7 (talk) 23:07, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  KIT Colors are totally different 
Talk:St. Paul's fingerfin

message: Is this fish named after the island or the actual saint?  And does anyone have any information on the describer Carmichael?  He's not in our List of zoologists by author abbreviation and I'd add him but all I can find is a first initial, D.  He was ostensibly active in the south Atlantic and Indian Oceans, as his name is appended to several Antarctic fish.  I am assuming he is not the same Carmichael who painted Erebus and Terror in the 1840s.  -- Miwa * talk * contribs ^_^ 17:34, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fifteen plus years too late! It’s named after the island of Ile St. Paul and the Carmichael is Dugald Carmichael.Quetzal1964 (talk) 09:47, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Brief commentary
Talk:High Justice

message: I thought that High Justice series wasn't part of the CodDominium series?  Does anyone know what Pournelle had to say about it? --Eldarone 17:36, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see a fit myself, either.  But the publisher certainly thinks so.  Discussion at chronology.org favors excluding it.  Pournelle's entry at the isfdb says yes, and lists it and Exiles to Glory together with Laurie Jo Hansen as the link.  I'll add a few more weasel words to distance High Justice from the CoDominium. Djdaedalus 15:58, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Part of the CoDominium Series?

message: There is no doubt that the stories reflect Pournelle's political and ideological point of view. That does not mean that the articel about them should also reflect and outspokenly endorse them. For example, it is a ligitmate view to think it would be better when companies have no trade unions, but this very much of non-Neutral Point of View. The whole article should be re-written adding "Pournelle thinks that" or "The story reflects Pournelle's view about" etc. User:Adam Keller
:This article accurately reflects the stories which is the subject of the article, and the stories are not written NPOV. Give the readers of en:wiki some credit for being able to tell that the POV is on the part of Pournelle without having to be led by the hand with every point of contention.KTo288 (talk) 00:27, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: No [[NPOV]]

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:15, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Flash

message: To avoid every one's idea of what should come top being king for a day, please can we list by alphabetical order of second component. Linuxlad 17:36, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good. Scoo 19:03, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal

message: I know this isn't wiktionary but ... a "Flash" is a common term in the north west of England for a lake or mere formed by subsidence (eg. from salt mining).  Examples include Pennington Flash Country Park (mentioned in this article) and these flashes in Cheshire. Richard W.M. Jones (talk) 12:11, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lake caused by subsidence

message: Why was flash lamp entry moved to the bottom? It's common to refer to that electronic component as just "flash". If flash memory and Adobe Flash fall into the Technology section, so does flash lamp. Avian (talk) 14:16, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, feel free to rearrange the items. You probably know more about it than I anyway. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 03:32, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flash lamp 

message: If the draft for the Japanese magazine is accepted, a separate heading for magazines may be in order.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:58, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It could probably fit in the existing "Other literature" section; or "Literature" could be further refined from the two subsections "Comics" and "Other literature" to "Comics", "Novels" and "periodicals" (the latter of which could contain both magazines and the newspaper). TJRC (talk) 00:10, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Magazines
Talk:Electra

message: According to Family tree of the Greek_gods, her praents were Atlas and Pleione. Does this refer to another Electra, the Pleiad?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jftsang (talk • contribs) 16:43, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Firejuggler86 (talk) 18:50, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parents? 

message: This article states that Electra was the mother of Iris, but Iris's mother was a sea nymph named Electra, not this Electra, who was a mortal princess.Lily20 (talk) 20:25, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Lily20 is correct that there is an "Electra" that was the mother of Iris. There are at least four characters from mythology named Electra (see Bergen Evans). This article is about Electra, daughter of Agamemnon, who is the most well-known "Electra." --GoldCoastPrior (talk) 15:51, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mother of Iris 

message: Does anyone know it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.9.179.119 (talk) 17:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is something to do with sunlight - the 'el' is from Helios. Firejuggler86 (talk) 18:51, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology of the name 

message: It is ***ABSOLUTE NONSENSE*** to claim that it's necessary to give a citation for the well-established fact that Electra was considered to be the daughter of Agamemnon and Clytemnestra. 
You editors *seriously* need to take a chill pill, you *really* do.
68.199.204.112 (talk) 20:37, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: While it's true that the opening paragraph shouldn't have a cn tag since all the information is non-controversial, the refimprove tag for the article as a whole is completely appropriate. There's only one reference given for an article of moderate length. More sources are very much needed. Also, you should probably give WP:CIVIL a read. -- Fyrefly  (talk) 21:48, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Over-The-Top Editing 

message: — Assignment last updated by Isabelap03 (talk) 20:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Rethinking Revenge
Talk:Brief (law)

message: about that?  If so, brief (design) would probably be an appropriate title, and then we can figure out how best to make a disambiguation page for the term "brief."  Postdlf 20:12, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I read here (on the right) that one should distinguish brief from motion, so perhaps we should make it clear in the two relevant articles (Brief (law) cites "motions" but I'm not sure whether, in this context, it should be wikified to Motion (legal). Apokrif (talk) 14:43, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brief vs motion 

message: You are well come to contribute and improve article legal awareness.
Mahitgar (talk) 12:30, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: legal awareness
Talk:Tikva Frymer-Kensky

message: I just redirected Frymer-Kensky, there might be some information on that page that needs to be merged with this one. Peyna 17:52, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Incoming redirect

message: I am removing the link to Koret Communications, having examined their website and found no connection to the late professor.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.194.163.9 (talk) 14:00, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Inappropriate Advertisment
Talk:View Royal

message: The article had erroneously listed the Four Mile Pub as the oldest Pub in BC. In fact, it is the Six Mile Pub, est 1855, that is the Oldest Pub in BC. www.sixmilepub.com  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.66.0.39 (talk) 05:32, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  View Royal 
Talk:Shard

message: The first bullet (dictionary definition) should be deleted. The second definition (re games) should probably be in its own article, as this is a disambig page.
Another comment:  "Shard" also means "low lying" in the north west of England.  There is also the Shard, a river in that area.  It reputedly has a similar meaning in the Scots language, but, more normally in Scotland, it commonly means cow dung.
----
It isn't entirely accurate to say EVE Online has no shards or instances, because technically they have both. The Chinese servers are separate from the rest of the world, due to Chinese law. Also instances do exist, called "Deadspaces", the only way into these areas is through a "jump gate" (different from a stargate), and players can be restricted from entering some of them by the types of ships they're flying. Although it may be different then other MMOG's instances, it is still technically the same according to the definition given on Instance dungeon which I am also editing due to the erroneous information about EVE and no instances. Since EVE is sorta in the gray-area for shards, and since the Chinese server is 100% invisible to anyone but in China, I'll leave it here. The description I'm going to edit to remove info not relevant to Shards (instances). Raeky (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 07:38, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Koppenberg

message: Did some editing.
I reckon a photo would be nice but am not too sure about the copyright rules here. --Bicycle repairman 18:08, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * This page says "the climb was re-introduced in 2002"
* Tour of Flanders says "The last major change was the inclusion of the steep Koppenberg climb in 2003"
Which is correct? --David Edgar 15:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2002 or 2003?
Talk:Conference Board of Canada

message: How objective is it to say that the Conference Board is "Exclusively objective and non-partisan"?  This should be changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.25.177.101 (talk) 
How are the selected publications determined? I wonder if they're just trying to market themselves.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.26.88.180 (talk) 03:03, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:The Center

message: A better picuture is needed of the building. A picture of a message board near the building is completely useless.
:I completely agree. At night, this tower has one of the most spectacular and beautiful lighting schemes in the world. For God's sake, somebody please get a decent photo up!
::Seconded. Somebody living in HK, please take a decent photo of this building and upload it to Commons. Or perhaps somebody from Panoramio would be willing to upload a pic or two. I added the infobox skyscraper, unfortunately the www.skyscraperpage.com was down at the moment, so I couldn't retrieve info from there. --Siipikarja 20:22, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Does anyone know how to fix the layout so that the two pictures aren't floating in the middle of nowhere? Noobly (talk) 03:10, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout 

message: In November 2014, Russian Alexander Remnev and his three friends scaled to the top of the building and took videos and selfies there. Are those guys famous or what? If not I propose that sentence to be removed. Doblecaña (talk) 22:40, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this that relevant?
Talk:University of Mainz

message: Apparently, there is a "Gutenberg award" by the University; recipients are:
* Krzysztof_Matyjaszewski#Awards_and_honors (2010)
* Alex Zunger (2009)
* possibly Rudolf Hell
* possibly Michael_Grätzel#Recognition
* possibly Stuart_Parkin#Awards
* possibly Nicholas A. Kotov
This award should be mentioned here (what are the criteria for obtaining it etc.), and its recipients should be listed.
However, there are also "Gutenberg awards" by several other organizations, so some caution is needed in collecting the names. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:58, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gutenberg award 
Talk:Decongestant

message: what happens once the swelling in the mucous membranes in the nasal passages is reduced? 
thanks
--Mctwists 18:12, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The previous poster is correct; it is woefully incomplete.
Also, under the section, "mechanism", what does the sentence "These are normally paired with antihistamines to lessen this effect, but they don't always even each other out." mean?  I can't figure it out.
02:26, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: swelling

message: It seems like most sources (the ScienceDirect topic page on decongestants has several good examples) don't consider corticosteroids to be decongestants. Should we remove them from this page?—Neil P. Quinn (talk) 11:40, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are corticosteroids decongestants? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Sofiaebeo (talk) 03:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: PHMD 2040 Service - Learning Fall 2023
Talk:Phil Judd

message: According to The Enemy and Toy Love, Judd was a member of The Enemy, not of Toy Love. Who is right? The Enemy and Toy Love articles, or this one? Please include a source. Thanks. Mark in wiki (talk) 16:51, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enemy or Toy Love? 

message: We now have a lot of subjective information introduced to the article's Conviction & Aftermath section:
At the very least there are linking, and punctuation errors to repair. I've already made some obvious changes.
See also: Special:Contributions/Philjudd.
wcrosbie (talk), Melbourne, Australia 12:40, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Subjective edits

message: I think it's a bit of stretch to include Judd in the NZ Expats in England category. As far as I know, he only lived there for a couple of years (1976-1978) during his time with Split Enz. Muzilon (talk) 01:36, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to agree, but it seems to be how the category is commonly used (like for footballers who spend one season overseas), so maybe best discussed somewhere else? Doctorhawkes (talk) 03:10, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expat in England category?
Talk:Pauline Boty

message: This reads to me like a copyvio, but I can't locate any online sources. -- Avocado 18:17, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: copyvio

message: Was her father Polish? There are many Polish exhibitions.~~ Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 17:27, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Polish-Anglo?