Talk:Traffic (conservation programme)

message: The name should be "Traffic", per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks). -- JHunterJ 22:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: All Caps TRAFFIC

message: :Image:Logo TRAFFIC.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:45, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Logo TRAFFIC.jpg

message: This section has virtually no references and the only ones it does have are to their own website, a COIU editor is edit warring to retain it. the section needs re-writing in prose with suitable third party sources ALL claims/puffery MUST be referenced to WP:reliable sources Theroadislong (talk) 12:06, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This has now been referenced entirely to TRAFFIC's own website, Wikipedia is not interested in what TRAFFIC has to say about itself ONLY what has been reported in reliable WP:Secondary sources. Theroadislong (talk) 15:23, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotional timeline section 

message: I removed the advert tag and replaced it with a "citations for verification" tag. Recent edits seem to have taken care of the problem with promotional material, but the article still lacks independent, third-party published sources per Wikipedia:Verifiability. Coconutporkpie (talk) 01:58, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advert? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Traffic (conservation programme). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.traffic.org/news/press-releases/pr_symposium_substitutes.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.traffic.org/tcm/pressrelease-us.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://traffic.org/news/medicinal_plants.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.traffic.org/news/press-releases/pr_wildlife-guide.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://traffic.org/news/press-releases/pr_eu_tough_law.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.traffic.org/news/press-releases/pr_shahtoosh.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.traffic.org/news/wildmeat.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.traffic.org/news/press-releases/press1.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.traffic.org/news/press-releases/pr_symposium_substitutes.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070629185359/http://www.wwf.org.mx/wwfmex/prog_traffic.php to http://www.wwf.org.mx/wwfmex/prog_traffic.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:36, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have read through about a third of this articles page so far. It concerns me that there seem to be quite a few rather important looking red links that I believe should have pages. It makes me wonder why they are missing from Wikipedia? -- Ubh [talk... contribs...] 11:42, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The number of important looking red links 

message: — Assignment last updated by Otter246 (talk) 13:28, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Conservation Biology

message: The history section of this article begins in the 1990's, despite TRAFFIC having existed since 1976. That's a decade and a half of missing history. RedKnight7146 (talk) 17:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  A significant chunk of the organization's history is missing