lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Irish rugby union players

message: The "Ireland" category represents the whole Island of Ireland. In fact the category used to be called "Island of Ireland" to avoid just this kind of issue from emerging. "Irish people" is a part of this broad "Ireland" category not the "Republic of Ireland" category. So the "Irish sportspeople" category is for people from anywhere in the "Island of Ireland", not just from the Republic. 
A thing only goes in a category if everything in it can also go in that category. So the NI football team can go in a "NI sportspeople" category and the RofI football team could go in a "RofI sportspeople" category. Also individual members of the rugby team can go in the "NI" or "RofI" category but if the whole team in itself goes in either a "NofI" or "RoI sportspeople" category then that implies that the whole team is from one of those two places, which is not the case.
Its the same with "British athletes". This goes under "British sportspeople". It wouldnt make sense for it to go under "British sportspeople" and "Welsh sportspeople" and "Scottish sportspeople" and "English sportspeople".
If it is necessary to avoid the word "Irish" we could call the category "Island of Ireland sportspeople". But that doesn't exactly trip off the tongue.
Ikari 23:38, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just put those rugby union players to who it applies in the "Northern Ireland sportspeople" category aswell. Ikari 23:52, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: This is clearly a special case because the team represents the whole of Ireland.  Those ulsterman who play for Ireland are generally middle class protestants who identify as being British.  To cut them off from the line from British sportspeople is wrong.  The nationality of someone from the Irish Republic is Irish, and those from the UK is British.  It is okay for categories to converge.  In this case, someone going down:
Sportspeople → British sportspeople → Northern Irish sportspeople
gets stuck there and can't get to Irish rugby footballers.  So, this should be in Northern Irish sportspeople too:
Sportspeople → British sportspeople → Northern Irish sportspeople → Irish rugby footballers
So I'll revert, again. Dunc|☺ 23:59, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:List of census metropolitan areas and agglomerations in Canada

message: The addition of the picture of Winnipeg raises issue, since the next two metropolitan areas have very similar populations, yet they are not pictured. Would it be better add the pictures of Quebec City and Hamilton or remove Winnipeg for consistency? Because choosing the top 7 is a strange choice if there are no other justifications. There is lots of extra space there anyways, so I would be more in favor of adding the pictures of the other two cities. Zacharycmango (talk) 00:52, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: These new images are pushing the actual content too far down the page. Let's stick to 1,000,000+ metro areas. BLAIXX 22:06, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

text: Everyone has different devices and on desktop computers everyone has different view settings. The more the photos the further down they push down the table on some of these. I support the less is more approach. Keeping at the top six, with such a large gap between six and seven, minimizes the problems for more readers on more devices. Hwy43 (talk) 00:14, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

text: Zacharycmango, I'd suggest that you try browsing Wikipedia on your phone or tablet sometime. You'll find that it's a very different experience than looking at it on your computer, and an experience that can be compromised by the inclusion of too many photos in the article. Bearcat (talk) 14:53, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winnipeg photo 

message: I started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board#List of census agglomerations in Canada regarding this article and List of census agglomerations in Canada, somewhat a continuation of this decade-old discussion. As this page has quite a few watchers, I'm linking it here as well. eviolite (talk) 21:29, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of census agglomerations in Canada 

message: The 2021 population estimates were published today, on January 13th, 2022 70.53.244.124 (talk) 22:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The official 2021 census numbers are due February 9, 2022. Unless someone really wants to update numbers now, I think we can wait. BLAIXX 00:30, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

text: Not done for now: Let's wait a couple weeks. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:34, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2022 

message: More recent information could be added, including which CMAs were added in 2021, wheras now only the CMAs added in 2016 are listed.
"For the 2021 Census, Fredericton (N.B.), Drummondville (Que.), Red Deer (Alta.), Kamloops (B.C.), Chilliwack (B.C.) and Nanaimo (B.C.), which were all CAs in 2016, became CMAs" (https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2021/ref/dict/az/Definition-eng.cfm?ID=geo009) Sggyy1 (talk) 19:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  List 2021 Census CMA additions
Talk:Alexa Internet

message: https://support.alexa.com/hc/en-us/articles/4410503838999 Unbeatable101 (talk) 22:16, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: RfC: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#RfC:_Alexa_Internet -- GreenC 15:34, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alexa.com shutting down 

message: That template has to be manually updated anyways. Is there any reason to use that template instead of just saying "Discontinued on month, year"? 
Squeezdakat (talk) 04:50, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the current status in infobox displayed like that? 

message: Why  does Alexa not support jiosavan music 2409:40E4:3:2829:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 12:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I can log in but when I say Alexa to play music. It response that this music is not find. 2409:40E4:3:2829:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 12:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why  does Alexa not support jiosavan music
Talk:Opsoclonus myoclonus syndrome

message: The deterioration of Purkinje Cells is one of the main characteristics of opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome, yet the article on Purkinje Cells does not reference the article on Opsoclonus-Myoclonus and vice versa. It would be helpful if the editors of these two articles could work together to cross-reference their articles.
(Richef (talk) 19:44, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cross-Reference
Talk:United States Postmaster General

message: Did you know that according to Executive Order #11002, the Postmaster General has the authority to  register every person in the US. Interesting... I wonder if it still applies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghostalker (talk • contribs) 23:04, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Executive Powers

message: Someone should write something about the PMG as played by Wilford Brimley in that episode of seinfeld where kramer tries to stop the mail. lol. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.67.133.58 (talk) 04:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Postmaster General on Popular Culture

message: Does anyone know anything about Osgood, 1st Postmaster-general under the Constitution? Dsnow75 Talk (talk) 06:47, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contributions?

message: I heard that a Postmaster General would be addressed as "General", at least in Cabinet meetings. Perhaps someone could include a paragraph about how one would have addressed the Postmaster General in the past.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tetsuo (talk • contribs) 18:26, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: form of address

message: Should the antiquated seal of the antiquated USPOD be used, or should the modern USPS signature be used?  Paritus34251 (talk) 21:41, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seal 

message: What do Assistant Postmasters do? I think the article could include a mention of the offices run by the US Postmaster General.
Here in 1909 you can see four offices under each assistant postmaster. 
*Office of the First Assistant Postmaster General
*office of the Second Assistant Postmaster General
*office of the Third Assistant Postmaster General
*office of the Fourth Assistant Postmaster General
Wil540 art (talk) 18:30, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion: Article could include the role of Assistant Postmaster generals
Talk:USS Potomac (AG-25)

message: Is there any particlar reason why this article uses an em dash (%96) in the title? Can we change this to a simple hyphen? It would certainly simplify linking. Blorg 01:04, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Change effected as suggested -- Chris j wood 12:39, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page says:
:In the meantime and for security purposes, the President's flag continued to be flown from the USS Potomac while she transited the Cape Cod Canal to New England waters. A Secret Serviceman, approximating the President in size and affecting his mannerisms when visible from a distance, played a starring role in the drama. Press releases issued daily from the USS Potomac led all who read them to believe that the President was really embarked in his yacht on a pleasure cruise.
While Atlantic Charter says:
:There was some concern at the time about secrecy and the safety of the British party. Although they joined the Prince of Wales in the greatest secrecy, US journalists had noted the absence of FDR from Washington and tied it in with the "coincidental" absence of Churchill from the House of Commons. The lack of censorship in a country still at peace allowed press speculation. Swiss radio, on the 6th August, reported rumours that the two heads of government were to meet in Canada. All this before the meeting had started, with the risks of U-boat interception en route.
So was the deception successful or not? AlistairMcMillan 11:58, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Inconsistency
Talk:Biblical exegesis

message: I believe this article should be redirected to Exegesis in Christianity.
I've added it to the See Also section.
Danny Beardsley 01:36, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: Re  ILLUSION.  The article cannot be improved in any significant way, as it is based on the illusion that oil and water will mix. Biblical exegesis attempts to make clear the intent of the Original Author. Period. Non-believers attempt to find out what parts of the text were written by which authors and when etc, and also how it came about that these writings were agreed upon to form a book called The Holy Bible. The fact that this also is known by the name of "Biblical exegesis" must necessarily lead to endless confusion if these irreconcilable views are treated in one and the same article. --BZ(Bruno Zollinger) 09:48, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Please help to improve this article"
Talk:Zoophilia/Archive 9

message: I must have missed these since they were replied to after it was archived.
:I didn’t say that I meant that in absolute terms. I mean equal as in animals have the right to equal consideration of their interests. In addition to that, I don’t think you will find any zoophiles that try to have sex with something the size of a common house cat. I already pointed out that I feed and take care of them but that doesn’t mean they are the same thing as a child. It may be similar but not the same.
::They are far more closer to children than to spouses (btw, do you let them walk on the table?) --Ciz 17:28, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I feed them, keep them healthy, pet them, play with them, give them tummy rubs, take them on walks, groom them, take them to the dog park, cuddle with them and give them lost of kisses. Is that okay with you or is the latter going too far? ;)--Steele 06:59, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a zoophilic relationship them? Do you regard them as your lovers? Are you erotically attracted to them? --Ciz 17:28, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  from previous archives 
Talk:Sartorius muscle

message: In the table it says one of the actions is flexion of the knee. In the text, under Actions, however it says extension of knee. Which one is correct? I believe it should be flexion of knee, but not sure.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.200.184.19 (talk) 12:32, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article seems to follow an unclear citation style, so I'm taggng it as such. However, I'm not very familiar at all with how medical articles work, if they're different from other subjects on Wikipedia. Some references are encased in reference tags, while others use the parenthetical method of referencing, and these latter ones are never anywhere clearly mentioned. – TCMemoire 19:46, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear citation style? 

message: Say why it is also called the honeymoon muscle. Jidanni (talk) 06:03, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:   honeymoon muscle.
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. counties/Archive 2

message: Any chance of a link here from the image description page of all the images? Martin 12:27, 16 Sep 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, my bad - the bot-images seem to have them - I just happened to pick on some that were uploaded manually. Martin 13:18, 16 Sep 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Links to here
Talk:Wall E. Weasel

message: from VfD:
It pains me to say it: Simpsons fancruft. How I wish there was a Simpsons wiki... —tregoweth 02:42, Nov 14, 2004 (UTC)
*Delete.  Merge with the episode it appeared in.  Fancruft.  (My moody, cynical side says that if there was a Simpsons wiki, people would just copy articles from that wiki to here.)   -- Antaeus Feldspar 03:59, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Worker and Parasite

message: Its back, and better than ever, I see no reason as to why this cant remain here or become featured eventualy.
Dfrg.msc  23:19, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh, nobodies moved Worker and Parasite anywhere.--Greasysteve13 09:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ::The writers of The Simpsons intended it as a satire of the Soviet socialist realism posters of the 1930s. 
Is there a cite for this being what the writers intended? As W&P is definitely not done in the socialist realist style, being heavily stylised.
Ashmoo 03:52, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Socialist Realism 

message: I removed the reference to German - seemed like "original research", and inserted the Russian term for "The End". --Janke | Talk 10:03, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoch Hech 

message: This isn't anything significant, but two questions on language: are the characters even talking anything legible or even resembling language, or is it, like the title, just nonsense.  Second, the words on the person's stand with peasants lined up: again, nonsense, or real?  I don't know why I ask such nitpicky questions, but I love details! LancasterII 04:13, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ponderance 

message: I chopped all the speculation on the meaning of the titles. The only sourced statement on their meaning states that it means nothing. So unsourced speculation, while fun, is pointless. Hate to be a spoil sport, but this is Wikipedia, not a fan forum. Ashmoo 05:12, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaning of titles
Talk:Digression

message: "I digress"
I have heard this term used so many times that I automatically associate it with the obligatory apology. 
It often seems as though the speaker is regretful, ashamed to inflict on an audience such awful, sleep inducing penance. 
Then why do it? Why do it with as much calculated intent? 
After all it is by definition an intentional means of changing a subject!
Well of course, to serve a greater purpose, a grander scheme that if the listener can conjure personal suspense, if the listener is patient, if the listener can somehow remain conscious! 
If the listener finally EARNS his or her passage to the final moment of enlightenment,
will the wait will have been worth it in the end? 
Is this what we are to believe and expect from those that dangle the carrots of knowledge and awareness in front of our satiated hunger? 
I am sorry when I digress, in fact I am guilt ridden, naked, as if without notice suddenly buried under layers of terms that mean only anything…to me.
No I am not a victim, I am the obsessive strategist! 
Only I know that there is a passage to freedom, an end to this labyrinth, 
A final and glorious destination, luminous with clarity and meaning and a new vision that is certain to yield great ideals and belief?
*Ummm, ok.  A digression that gets out of hand or comes only from free-association is more properly called a side track, I think.  Some authors have pretended that their digressions have gotten out of control, but the good ones know exactly what they're doing.  As for speakers who wander down the hallways of memory and personal experience without an Ariadne to get them back out again, they're just known as bad speakers.  (Most of the time that "I digress" is uttered, I think it is a protest to an interlocutor and not an apology; the speaker has had a red herring swim by and has netted it and now wishes to steer the conversation back to the main business.  This can be the case even in lecture halls, when a speaker has to address some obvious but irrelevant matter like what William Wallace wore under his kilts.) Geogre 22:51, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Max Burns

message: Are we sure about who he defeated?  Entering that name (Charles "Champ" Walker, Jr. or variations of it) in the Biographical Directory doesn't yield any hits.
Rlquall 03:57, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I live in the area, it was definitely Champ Walker. He's never been in Congress before, so he wouldn't be in the directory. Try a Google search. Everyking 04:25, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses/Archive 5

message: As we were getting warning messages regarding the size of this discussion page I moved all discussion threads which were older than one month and/or undated to a new archive: 
* Talk:Jehovah%27s_Witnesses/archive 3
However, I did leave comments on the "Nontrinitarian" subject as it still seems to be a hot topic. --DannyMuse 05:47, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creation of Archive #3 

message: When I come to the article, here's what I want to find in the intro, but don't.
* Where is JW based?
* How is JW classified among christianity?  Is it related in anyway to any other branches?  Does it have any schisms or offshoots?
* How many adherents are there?
* Where are the adherents distributed?
* Who are some notable adherents?
The fourth paragraph is much closer than the preceding three to what I expect to learn when I happen upon this page. Tom - Talk 22:33, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Intro, what it's missing
Talk:Mukataa

message: This article deals almost exclusively with the Mukataa of Ramallah. The title is thus misleading. Call it "Mukataa of Ramallah" or separate somehow between the larger term and this specific site, that by now doesn't resemble at all the original Tegart fort, which is the general definition for a Palestinian "Mukataa".Arminden (talk) 10:15, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: CHANGE THE NAME OF THE ARTICLE!
Talk:List of religious populations

message: Most sources I've found say there are over 100 million:
https://unshintoismreligionuk.weebly.com/number-of-shinto-people.html
https://www.worlddata.info/religions/shinto.php
https://www.state.gov/reports/2020-report-on-international-religious-freedom/japan/ Justinpark01 (talk) 05:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Shinto number seems extremely low 

message: add the religion "Sillyism" (an official religion) origin: Max Fosh (a youtuber) in england The Rat12 (talk) 20:08, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. 💜  melecie  talk - 00:41, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sillyism request on 9 December 2023 

message: Name: Saddam Hussain Memon
Date of Birth: February 9, 2001
Place of Birth: District Sujawal, Sindh, Pakistan
Education:
Primary: Government College (Sujawal)
Law: Hamdard School of Law (Karachi)
Profession: High-profile advocate/lawyer in Karachi 39.39.19.120 (talk) 11:52, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saddam Hussain Memon 

message: Hindu 2409:4080:20E:82E6:0:0:4D3:E8A1 (talk) 06:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  World religions number by adherents 

message: Please add Hellenism to this list. There are approximately 2,000 of us. King-Charlie-TheHorse (talk) 18:26, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Cannolis (talk) 18:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 May 2024
Talk:Stance

message: this is a really great article.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.17.143.201 (talk) 05:24, 14 November 2004 -- author— Preceding unsigned comment added by Derek Ross (talk • contribs) 05:27, 14 November 2004‎
: No it's actually a dictionary definition.  If you want to turn it into an encyclopedia article, you will need to add stuff about the origin of stance, the development of stance, the history of stance, the significance of stance, etc.  Then it might be a great article but as it stands it's in danger of being deleted. -- Derek Ross |  Talk 05:27 & :28, 2004 Nov 14 (UTC)
:: In the interest of reducing confusion on talk pages, i note that the first revision, whose edit-history entry began with
::: 05:24, 14 November 2004 . . 70.17.143.201 (talk | block) (Created entry ...
::was indeed deleted from the history. That deletion occurred either at 
:::16:20, 21 January 2005, orbetween the article's creation and the initialization, a couple of weeks later (03 December 2004) of the WP deletion log.
::--Jerzy•t 06:03, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Deleted first revision)
Talk:Sarcophagus of Eshmunazar II

message: I haven't the patience (or the young eyes) to check letter-by-letter: Is there any difference, other than font, between the "Hebrew transcription" and the awkwardly huge "Hebrew transliteration"? —Tamfang (talk) 08:40, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: @Tamfang Jeylime (talk) 23:02, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for clearing that up. —Tamfang (talk) 23:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hebrew v Hebrew 

message: Hi Elie. Just a note about the dates: Tabnit according to his article ruled circa 490 BC, which seems quite late compared to the dates of his successor Eshmunazar II. Any idea how to sort this out? Thanks for your great work on these articles! पाटलिपुत्र Pat  (talk) 07:54, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes  recent dating based on updated numismatic, archaeological and epigraphic data place the Eshmunazar dynasty in the 6th century BC. Tabnit's article needs a major overhall after I finish with that of his heir. I will fix the dates for now until I have the time to review the entire thing. Thank you so much for pointing this out, if you identify any other discrepancies please let me know.  08:27, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates

message: I have reworded the sentence in the lead in line with note 7, which says the owner of the female sarcophagus is unknown. Probably, my wording could be improved and the information should also be included in the body of the article. TSventon (talk) 14:12, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @TSventon It's an improvement. Thank you.  el.ziade (talkallam) 17:26, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other two sarcophagi