Talk:Kult (role-playing game)

message: I would rather say that the game Kult draws on similarities and magical orders based on millennia-old beliefs systems, not the opposite, honestly.
:I think I agree with you there, I honestly don't know why Dragon Rouge is even mentioned, as the in-game magic does not really contain anything like that.  The copy the I own (The English 1st edition, published by Metropolis) contains a large section on magic, in which it disscuss (in a rather exaggerating & dark tone) several occult traditons, the majority of which are old long-practiced world belifes.  The only excetion to this is Satanism, which in the game has almost nothing in common with the real-world religion.  In Kult they are just the loyal servents of Astroth and his Death Angels.
:Above all else, it should be noted that these 'occult traditions,' really have no impact in the way magic is played in the game.  Mostly because they are only there to help with the background knowledge, and personaitly of charcters. The actual magical system itself uses a lores/schools of magic like most other RPGs, and ultimatly one's background has no major effect on the magic used in the game. Avador 17:09, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kult and Occult Organisations 

message: The list of editions in different languages is not complete. I own one set of first edition books in german, including the rulebook and OK-KULT (supplement only available in german). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Recombine (talk • contribs) 19:09, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe The OK-Kult is not something Germany-specific. The supplement contains parts of other books which have been published in both Swedish and English. See the Swedish Game Master Screen, the English magic books, the Illusion #1 Poster and the Swedish sinkadus magazines. 88.88.112.231 20:50, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: This appears to be mostly word-for-word from http://www.kult-rpg.com/wiki/kult - it would appear someone has lifted one from the other. - 203.87.69.229 07:13, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They have adapted our text, not vice versa, I think. Their earliest draft is from January, and I compared our drafts from that time to theirs, and it seems the relevant passages appeared here first. --Agamemnon2 11:41, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Very true. Sorry about that. I suspect it was copied over because the article here has been edited by some of the members on www.kult-rpg.com. Anyways, I hope I've cleaned it up now. -torb 88.88.112.231 20:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism? 

message: This article needs some cleaning. I have corrected smaller mistakes here and there, but in general the article has sections with very akward syntax. I surmise that some of the contributors may not have English as their primary language. Any help would be much appreciated.
80.196.177.84 (talk) 10:17, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massive cleanup needed. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kult (role-playing game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724190812/http://bjorn.foxtail.nu/rollspel/krit_motion.htm to http://bjorn.foxtail.nu/rollspel/krit_motion.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041122204807/http://www.aftonbladet.se/vss/nyheter/story/0,2789,246481,00.html to http://www.aftonbladet.se/vss/nyheter/story/0,2789,246481,00.html
*Added  tag to http://pub.tv2.no/dyn-nettavisen/arkiv/?archiveSection=765&archiveItem=140520
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:44, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Things to fix: 
General update because of the new edition. 
It is not possible to say 1st edition was less action-oriented than subsequent ones, after all, it did feature an extensive guns section. The new edition (Divinity Lost) should be presented as focusing more on mystery and psychological horror than action, because that's how its Apocalypse Now engine works (=its not a simulationist or detail-oriented rpg engine).
Better organization: clearly say what edition each paragraph talks about. Some sections speak as if there aren't different editions with wildly different rulesets.
Pruning OR: ttrpg articles are notoriously difficult to source, but the current article contains too much OR.
More? 
CapnZapp (talk) 08:53, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:06, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion