lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Helper dependent virus

message: I fail to see how the same source can support both figures here (5% and 8%). I cannot discriminate this edit from vandalism based on its edit summary, and am compelled to revert it until I read the paper (if I can access it online)--Quisqualis (talk) 16:14, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Helper_dependent_virus&diff=next&oldid=819614316 Recent edit]
Talk:Hematemesis

message: The intro. says fresh red blood, while the signs say: Brown or black blood, Blood that looks like coffee grounds!!! how come?!!! --TheEgyptian 12:36, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand the need to say "...looks like coffee grounds when you have in fact, not swallowed coffee grounds."  A little redundant.  That's what "looks like" means.  I don't know.  If nobody objects I'll come back and change it in awhile.207.62.143.160 (talk) 08:26, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes that is a horrible sentence.  This article, often, has too many, commas.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.146.50 (talk) 11:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi! I'm currently working on improving the article, so will try to remove any unusual grammar or phrasing as I go. Thanks! Bibeyjj (talk) 17:25, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's colour 

message: 1. Should this go in a new section called Family History or Genetics: A history of excessive alcohol use or liver disease
2A. Any esophogastric symptoms, such as nausea or vomiting
2B. Brown or black vomit
2C. Vomit that looks like coffee grounds
Should 2A, B, and C look something like this:
Any esophogastric symptoms, such as feeling nauseous, having brown or black vomit that looks like coffee grounds, or dark, tar like stools (melena)
The DarkArcher was here (talk) 03:20, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symptoms 

message: I really think this section could be removed entirely. When I first read the article and read the definition (vomiting of blood) followed by the rather redundant "patient is vomiting blood" I laughed quite loudly. Does anyone agree that this should be removed or is i somehow relevant? 2601:2:8900:5AC:58DA:4F9D:4CA:F8ED (talk) 01:13, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi! This has now been rephrased so that information is not repeated. Thanks! Bibeyjj (talk) 17:25, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signs
Talk:Hematopathology

message: The WikiProject classification for Hematopathology is Start-class. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria. If it should be a stub, then please set  on this talk page & reinstate the stub tag(s) on the article page.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  14:11, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please confirm classification 

message: — Assignment last updated by Kraewilliams88 (talk) 18:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: 4A Wikipedia Assignment
Talk:Hemostat

message: I disagree on merging the forceps article with Hemostat; Hemostat is a very precise and particular instrument. Forceps is much broader. Intersofia (talk) 19:52, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[forceps]] 

message: "By locking on, the mass between the tips rises to approximately 4 kg." This is inaccurate writing. Tools distribute force, not mass. Someone with a proper source who can supply the right value in N or lb should correct this line. 75.161.154.167 (talk) 16:57, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with force 

message: The term, Vascular clamp redirects here, yet there is no mention of the term in the article. Those who have experience with the topic, please revise. Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 05:09, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vascular clamps.
Talk:Bataan (film)

message: The "Reception" section makes no sense:'According to one historian, the film "successfully made white viewers aware... of the inherent sadism in the American lynching ritual". By the 1940s publicans were able to mass-distribute photographs taken of hanged men, so there was a "[rewriting of] the respective relations of the black and the Asian to the white norm, as the film adjusted to a wartime context [which raised questions of integration]."[1]'. First, what does it mean by "publicans." A publican is a tax collector or (British) a tavern keeper. Why would either group wish to mass-distribute photos of hanged men? Second, no one is lynched in the movie, in the 'hanged by the neck until dead' sense,  although many are shot, blown up, stabbed or hacked with swords. One man is seen hanging after he is killed. The commentary makes no sense, since there was no particular focus on the one man of 13 who was hung up after he was dead. Photos of lynchings were distributed in the will remove  this from the article if it cannot be improved, or at least the "publican" part  explained. Edison (talk) 23:54, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't remember making that edit. Disregard it. Ottre 00:09, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I took another look at the DVD. At 1:02, it shows "Salazar" hanging by the neck, dead. The Sarge says the Japanese tortured him before strangling him, so it was like a lynching, but in the film it does not stand out much from the other painful violent deaths, and all that's shown is a couple of seconds of him dangling. Edison (talk) 00:33, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In the film "Back to Bataan" there is an extensive scene of the hanging of a beloved and noble local official by Japanese soldiers. The commentary in the film journal might be in regards to the other Bataan movie. Edison (talk) 04:40, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Garbled section
Talk:Human Tissue Authority

message: Are these considered as 'Exhibits' under the Act, and have churches obtained the relevant licences?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.77.4.192 (talk) 01:29, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please can you clarify what you actually mean by "Religious Relics"? SirEntente (talk) 11:54, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Religious Relics
Talk:Coney Island (1943 film)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Kateshortforbob talk 18:28, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Hyperesthesia

message: In the term "exacerbation des sens", the word "sens" has a hyperlink to a town of that name ; which I think is a mistake.
GeoffAvogadro (talk) 13:13, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think so too. I will go ahead and remove the link for now. Radioactivated (talk) 00:29, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyperlink error ?
Talk:Wesley J. Smith

message: The references as they are currently presented are of little value -- they should, whenever possible, link to something on the internet.  •Jim62sch• 16:51, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Möxämmädämin of Kazan

message: This text is abominable, and looks like a more or less literal translation from Russian, at times. I will be editing this when I find the time. However: it is known that introduction of a definite versus an indefinite article can change the meaning of an English text. --Pan Gerwazy 08:41, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language 

message: If someone does a search of this article, he will not be able to find it because the letters used in the spelling of the name do not exist in English. Whoever wrote this article is an idiot. 66.65.129.159 (talk) 22:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of the name
Talk:The Demi-Paradise

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 06:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: I just saw this movie and i believe it is a film to promote communism, what do you guys think should this be classed as a film that has underlying political motives othen then a romantic comedy film.--Abb401 04:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political Film?
Talk:Hyporeflexia

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://books.google.com/books?id=1PDk6kA4eZwC&pg=PT600&lpg=PT600&dq=Table5.20+Reflex,+motor+and+sensory+findings+in+disorders&source=bl&ots=UpaRJItFr_&sig=_rvFDTbHJP4Hb-UwOAFOHRIFJgI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=pHsxVJbMFZSeyAT2vYKwBQ&ved=0CCkQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Table5.20%20Reflex%2C%20motor%20and%20sensory%20findings%20in%20disorders&f=false and possibly other sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:12, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Category talk:Coats of arms of former countries

message: It is rather an integral part of Socialist Federative Republic of Yugoslavia, which is here represented, so there is no need to forge history and repeat something that is included in the CoA of SFRY article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.198.138.165 (talk) 00:41, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Socialist Republic of Serbia is not a country
Talk:Brothers in Law (novel)

message: I think in the long term a split will be necessary, but atm there is not enough information so should remain a single article for now. Tim! 15:55, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've split the film and TV series off into their own articles and created a disambig page. I haven't split off the radio versions simply becuase I don't have any sources on them. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 01:24, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Split
Talk:In-service program

message: Only Wikipedia calls in-service inservice. Therefore, we should correct this article to be "in-service program".https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS719US720&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=inservice+or+in-serviceSponsion (talk) 02:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. I leave the correction of double redirects to the bots. Rotideypoc41352 (talk) 20:01, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment moved from article page
Talk:International Classification of Primary Care

message: The information on the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) Wikipedia page is correct, however in some areas, limited. The article needs to be expanded to address a wider audience that may not have the same knowledge base as a health care professional. In the first paragraph, the World Health Organization (WHO) is not given its abbreviation however the abbreviation is assumed and used in the very next sentence. It would be advisable to discuss how the ICPC is used in different countries worldwide (a portion of the external links literature states that it is), as the information in the text box on the right hand pane declares that its country is the United Kingdom. We are unable to determine if the ICPC originated in the United Kingdom or if it is only used in the United Kingdom. The structure section of the article could be expanded by providing further information about the 17 ICPC chapters relating to diagnosis classification. Further information could be utilised from the external links to expand the article. This suggestion forms a part of an educational assignment for Health Informatics at La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.  Leah L Marino (talk) 12:15, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion

message: This article displays good use of internal and external links.
Spelling and Grammer is good.
The information is very informative and objective.
The use of sub-sections and sub section headings is also good.
The content may need to be expanded a bit e.g. some sections hold no content as yet.
More references would also be good if applicable.
TessVague (talk) 20:34, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Review

message: Review for Health Informatics
The article addresses what the ICPC is and it's classification method scheme. The references provide a through detailed knowledge of what ICPC and are although there are not many references they  are detailed.
Suggestions
Some sections of the page could deal with a more detailed content. The article could utilize more hyperlinks to add aditional information and  additional information on ICPC's history would also provide beneficial relevance to the article.
Caillin Austin (talk) 04:01, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review of ICPC(IHC)
Talk:Intravenous pyelogram

message: It redirects here and is mentioned but not defined. 86.159.197.174 (talk) 16:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is "cystometrography"? 

message: This article has merged IVP with IVU, most authors separate these topics. kindly look into this matter. Malik arhan (talk) 06:40, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixed Information about IVP and IVU
Talk:Jacksonian seizure

message: The 'Presentation' section presents original research. One individual used information from his/her personal medical history. Such information belongs in a private medical record kept by this person's doctor. This very private information DOES NOT belong in a globally available encyclopedia. Personal medical information should be replaced with information from published medical literature. There should be plenty of peer-reviewed, published, reliable sources for this subject.  —74.61.141.228 (talk) 22:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A case description might be appropriate if it came from a reliable source, but you're right, this first-person account with no sourcing is obviously unencyclopedic, and I have removed it. Looie496 (talk) 18:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research - personal experience
Talk:Rachel Roy

message: 68.46.148.234 (talk) 14:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Cannolis (talk) 14:35, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 April 2016 

message: Heyme12345 (talk) 17:16, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. -- sandgemADDICT yeah? 01:28, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 May 2016
Talk:Joseph Lewi

message: I'm proposing that this article be deleted for 2 reasons. In addition to violating copyright, its subject is not sufficiently notable. His biggest claim to fame seems to be that he was president of a county medical society. There are presently at least 54 county medical societies in the State of New York alone. The article also states that he was also one of 42 people who organized Albany's Union League...but even that organization doesn't have its own Wikipedia article (Union Leagues do, but not Albany's in particular), let alone its various founders. The second paragraph lists the accomplishments of his children. That information, if deemed important enough to include in Wikipedia, should be on the pages of those respective individuals. Again, it does not justify the inclusion of this article in Wikipedia.Niccast (talk) 04:29, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion
Talk:Karman cannula

message: The last section of this article is an opinion, not fact:
"Although Karman aspiration is generally accepted as a "safe" method of surgical evacuation of the uterus, it is as dangerous as other sharp or steel gynecological surgical instruments at untrained hands. The surgical termination of pregnancy should be considered a serious intervention where bleeding, uterine and other vital organ perforations, serious pain and shock are -although rare - probable and serious complications."
This paragraph either needs to cite a reputable source or be taken down. As far as I know this method is used by many physicians and is considered quite safe. Is there a doctor or scientific source that can be quoted saying it is as dangerous as other sharp instruments? I also don't think any physician would accept the statement that "serious pain and shock are...probable and serious complications." While serious, these complications are not probable.
Lknelson3 (talk) 23:57, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I was BOLD and removed the comment. Lknelson3 (talk) 05:34, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing un-cited comments
Talk:Kirby-Bauer antibiotic testing

message: Although the merge has been proposed since 7/12, there has been no discussion and thus no consensus.
Support as the pages are duplicates. Yangosplat222 (talk) 04:30, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This merge has been proposed for over a year. With no objections I have completed this merge. LT90001 (talk) 01:33, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Agar diffusion test]]
Talk:Kleihauer–Betke test

message: I miss the original reference, but I am not able to insert it:
Kleihauer E, Braun H, Betke K. Demonstration von fetalem Blut in den Erythrozyten eines Blutausstriches. Klin Wschr 1957; 35: 637-638  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.14.173.148 (talk) 07:47, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

message: Reagents, used in acid Elution Test, and reagents preparation is needed Ilyaskhan (talk) 10:03, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reagents
Talk:Lepromin

message: Is there any actual source for this infectious plasmid stuff. I can't find any in the literature, the article has no citations, and the whole thing seems dubious to me. 68.197.174.59 (talk) 20:23, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Plasmid

message: Is there really a need for a separate article about lepromin? Would it not be more useful included as a paragraph on the article about leprosy?PD1936 (talk) 13:28, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. No. — LlywelynII 04:15, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  unnecessary article? 

message: I assume this is a typo for a fridge? — LlywelynII 04:15, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: "regrigator"

message: * .
* .
Presumably it's actually a Chinese name like "Pan Caishen", "Pan Caosi", &c. in pinyin or "Pan Ch'ai-sen", "Pan Chu-shu", &c. in Wade-Giles but I can't find any sources on who this would've been. He worked for the Shanghai hospitals in 1942, though. — LlywelynII 10:53, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for future article expansion
Talk:Lightheadedness

message: Lightheadedness sucks. Caused me to get 11 staples in my head :(Kirbykirbykirby3 (talk) 23:53, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Maintenance template not needed - who sees a reason for it and where?!?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.92.100.120 (talk) 17:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maintenance template 

message: What's the difference between lightheadedness and clouding of consciousness?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.48.118.118 (talk) 23:50, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clouding of consciousness
Talk:List of abbreviations for medical organisations and personnel

message: The list has RCS for Royal College of Surgeons.  Is that just Royal College of Surgeons of England, or does it include the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow?  What are the correct abbrev for the Scottish colleges?  FRCS and MRCS are used for all three and for Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland as well.  -- Randall Bart 03:08, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal College of Surgeons
Talk:List of ICD-9 codes 520–579: diseases of the digestive system

message: All ICD-9 codes direct to a domain which has multiple Google Adsense ads on each page. Looks spammy. Is there a better site that can be linked to? Hannabee 20:20, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The definition for the links is provided by the template Template:ICD9. If you would like to suggest a different provider, the best place to suggest one would be at Template talk:ICD9. --Arcadian 03:11, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Codes direct to this site
Talk:List of ICD-9 codes 630–679: complications of pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium

message: can anyone point me in the right direction to find more information on the internet to find icd-9 coding for pregnancy and childbirth and the use of it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.123.151.18 (talk) 17:17, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ICD-9 coding info?
Talk:List of ICD-9 codes 680–709: diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue

message: I'm a bit new to Wiki talk, so please be gentle.
Am I missing the source for the information of this page? ...clearly there was a source where this information (at least the codes themselves) was taken from.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matannnn (talk • contribs) 11:41, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of information?
Talk:List of ICD-9 codes 710–739: diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue

message: This article contains this line:
* Derangement, ant, med meniscus, knee
: 
Thus it links to an article about ants, i.e. certain insects. And the article titled Derangement, to which this also links, is about a topic in mathematics. In mathematics, a derangement of a finite set is a permutation with no fixed points. That's what this article links to. More appropriate targets for those links should be found. Michael Hardy (talk) 00:53, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ants and derangements