lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mediterranean (disambiguation)

message: I changed the Redirect to a Disambiguation because "The Mediterranean" as a phrase does not only refer to the Sea but also to the land and the climate. Because all of these have claim as being the Mediterranean people think of, it deserves to be disambiguated and not redirected to only one of the options. Valley2city 04:11, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Bold 65.18.124.206 (talk) 07:28, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

text: About 3000. I am thinking that this can be redirected to the sea and the contents can go to Mediterranean (disambiguation). we can put an "other uses" tag at the top of the article for the sea. Dekimasu 00:34, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed to a disambiguation
Talk:Michelle Pfeiffer

message: It should be easy to write a Bot which will construct a T.o.C.  (Even if the Bot's output must be checked, initially, by human editors.)  See my similar comments at |Grace Kelly|.  (This Pfeiffer page has the additional irritation that some users will waste 2-5 seconds, since the link to the Performances page is buried, rather than presented as at other celebrity pages.) ˜˜˜˜ Jamesdowallen (talk) 19:51, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This article does have a ToC. Perhaps I'm not understanding your post? Schazjmd (talk) 20:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's the Table of Contents?
Talk:Province of West Prussia

message: Why the move? This was to make it fit within the developing standards of the project Historical States, as applied to the Prussian state before 1871. See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Prussia While most provinces don't have the problem, some like Brandenburg and Posen need to have different titles from the towns of the same name.Bwood 04:10, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't this page be renamed West Prussia, with the current information at West Prussia included here? It seems that there was a previous plan to name all provinces of the Kingdom of Prussia by "Province of ...", yet that project fizzled out. That has caused this situation with "West Prussia" and "Province of West Prussia". The province pre-WWI is by far the more commonly sought-for usage of "West Prussia". There really does not seem to be enough information at West Prussia to warrant its own article, let alone relegating the more important usage to "Province of West Prussia". Olessi 10:16, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Whether the Historical States project is active or not, the fundamental logic is best for the long term. West Prussia should be the general, linking to the province page and vice versa. Bwood 03:39, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name
Talk:ABC (programming language)

message: "CWI" here links to an incorrect organization with the same letters. The correct organization is the one indicated at http://www.cwi.nl/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.99.141.129 (talk) 04:11, 27 June 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ABC programming language → ABC (programming language) 
– Conformance with WP naming conventions atanamir
*Move completed.  --humblefool® 20:05, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Why was this language invented?  When?  Is "currently" referring to 2007, or the 1990s? -- Beland 16:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to second this. Two and half years later, this basic info is still not here. I'm moving the expand template to the main page and adding a stub. --Evil Eccentric (talk) 02:43, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Very good!--Sae1962 (talk) 15:30, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: . 115.70.100.169 (talk) 18:00, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't "not.in" be in uppercase!? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Calebsmith0319 (talk) 14:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Digital Humanities Spring 2024
Talk:Pelion

message: Page history before deletion:
    * (cur) (last)  23:42, 24 May 2004 62.103.78.12
    * (cur) (last) 23:38, 24 May 2004 62.103.78.12
    * (cur) (last) 23:35, 24 May 2004 62.103.78.12
    * (cur) (last) 23:35, 24 May 2004 62.103.78.12
    * (cur) (last) 10:33, 24 Apr 2004 Sannse m (delink Greek, duplicate if disambiged)
    * (cur) (last) 09:58, 12 Mar 2004 Muriel Gottrop m (fmt)
    * (cur) (last) 09:58, 12 Mar 2004 Muriel Gottrop m (fmt)
    * (cur) (last) 23:42, 4 Mar 2004 62.103.79.96
    * (cur) (last) 23:34, 4 Mar 2004 62.103.79.96
    * (cur) (last) 23:27, 4 Mar 2004 62.103.79.96
    * (cur) (last) 23:26, 4 Mar 2004 62.103.79.96
    * (cur) (last) 23:25, 4 Mar 2004 62.103.79.96
    * (cur) (last) 22:44, 3 Mar 2004 62.103.76.72
    * (cur) (last) 22:43, 3 Mar 2004 62.103.76.72
    * (cur) (last) 21:19, 3 Mar 2004 62.103.76.72
    * (cur) (last) 21:17, 3 Mar 2004 62.103.76.72
    * (cur) (last) 15:32, 2 Mar 2004 62.103.76.210
    * (cur) (last) 15:32, 2 Mar 2004 62.103.76.210
    * (cur) (last) 15:31, 2 Mar 2004 62.103.76.210
    * (cur) (last) 15:20, 2 Mar 2004 62.103.76.210
    * (cur) (last) 15:17, 2 Mar 2004 62.103.76.210
    * (cur) (last) 15:04, 2 Mar 2004 62.103.76.210
    * (cur) (last) 14:57, 2 Mar 2004 Optim
    * (cur) (last) 14:55, 2 Mar 2004 62.103.76.210
    * (cur) (last) 14:50, 2 Mar 2004 62.103.76.210
    * (cur) (last) 14:49, 2 Mar 2004 62.103.76.210
    * (cur) (last) 14:48, 2 Mar 2004 62.103.76.210
    * (cur) (last) 14:38, 2 Mar 2004 Rasmus Faber (copyvio from http://www.findaruin.com/Greece%20-%20Pelion.htm)
    * (cur) (last) 14:38, 2 Mar 2004 62.103.76.210
    * (cur) (last) 14:33, 2 Mar 2004 62.103.76.210
    * (cur) (last) 14:29, 2 Mar 2004 62.103.76.210
    * (cur) (last) 14:28, 2 Mar 2004 62.103.76.210
    * (cur) (last) 14:26, 2 Mar 2004 62.103.76.210
-- Jim Regan 04:32, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've restored the relevant edits. Selective undeletion was enabled in December 2004 and we now have revision deletion for cases like this. Graham87 13:41, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A. Above is useless and bizzare.
B. Should be redirected from Mount Pelion.
C. The location of Mount Pelion should be added to wikimedia and the coordinates of it should be added to the information of the place if possible, so it maybe accessed with perhaps GoogleMaps or Google Earth.
--Nonymous-raz (talk) 03:20, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Improvement
Talk:Haren, North Brabant

message: Page history prior to deletion:
    * (cur) (last)  10:01, 12 Mar 2004 Muriel Gottrop ()
    * (cur) (last) 22:20, 2 Mar 2004 Patrick (mun. Oss, )
    * (cur) (last) 16:44, 2 Mar 2004 Ferryl20
    * (cur) (last) 16:26, 2 Mar 2004 Timwi m
    * (cur) (last) 16:25, 2 Mar 2004 Maveric149 ()
    * (cur) (last) 16:23, 2 Mar 2004 Ahoerstemeier ()
    * (cur) (last) 16:22, 2 Mar 2004 80.61.194.178
-- Jim Regan 04:35, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've restored the relevant edits. Selective undeletion was enabled in December 2004 and we now have revision deletion for cases like this. Graham87 13:20, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Old page history
Talk:Kerrison Predictor

message: Problem in page:
"However in February 1941 the US Navy decided to use the Bofors gun as well, and the Army then agreed to in order to simplify production."
This sentence has a missing word or phrase, but I am not sufficiently knowlegeble to provide it.
... Army then agreed to xxx in order to ...
Logic would dictate that the army converted its M7 orders to additional M5 orders - is this what happened?
Leonard G. 05:03, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial post

message: looks like were having competing articles. the U.S. army manuals use the name Director (military), predictor sounds british or naval Brian in denver (talk) 23:39, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: whats in a name
Talk:X-Men: The Animated Series

message: "One difference from the comic version is that Wolverine actually sees the claws when they first come out his hands." What? Coemgenv (talk) 18:10, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: What does this mean under Wolverine?

message: Do producers ever mention in interviews why she was left out? All I can figure is Jubilee served a similar role as young girl joining the team like she did in Pryde of the Xmen? 184.145.18.50 (talk) 09:48, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Kitty Pryde

message: Now that X-Men '92 is a continuous comic series, I think it should have a stand alone article. Thoughts? Rachelskit (talk) 19:24, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok I'm doing it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rachelskit (talk • contribs) 18:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate article?

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:11, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: X-Men (TV series) →  – Per WP:COMMONNAME (the show is widely referred to as X-Men: The Animated Series by reliable sources), WP:NATURALDAB (natural disambiguations are preferred over parenthetical ones), and WP:PRECISE ( could refer to the other X-Men TV shows found at X-Men (disambiguation)). InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:08, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

text: It seems like this name should be X-Men:The Animated Series, without a space, rather than X-Men: The Animated Series. If you do move this article, please leave a redirect. 23:23, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm afraid I don't understand, why would there not be a space after the colon? I have never seen a work of fiction titled that way, nor is this how it is written in the above nomination or in the article itself. InfiniteNexus (talk) 02:37, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 June 2022 

message: disney+ japan released an updated release schedule and it does not include x-men '97. any thoughts?223.233.27.215 (talk) 13:34, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: To quote :  Also, you did not need to post the same message on six pages. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:41, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Longer 2023
Talk:Rebadging

message: Since only two sentences of the article apply to uses outside of the automotive industry, it makes sense to rename this article Rebranding (automobile).  This article deals emphasizes (poorly, as it is currently written) the marketing strategy over the actual process. 
Any thoughts? --SteveCof00 (talk) 10:05, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename article? 

message: A google search turns up a lot of references to employees transitioning to a new employer while remaining at their current position. Use in the auto industry is a distant second. The term is also used in the computer industry, and presumably others, forbre-labeling products source from another company. Peter Flass (talk) 18:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too narrow scope
Talk:Osami Nagano

message: To the original editors of this page you have my esteemed gratitude. My research into the Pacific Theatre largely includes eyewitness and similar primary source actors who drive a counterpoint to the IJN’s established precedent for an attack upon Pearl Harbor. Are there more articles you can draw upon to further expand the discord present between Nagano and his peers?
Remembering the 8-track (talk) 22:16, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Well done 

message: I noticed that this article is missing the section about received decorations that other pages about military leaders have. I'm not in a position to add the list right now, but if someone else be willing to, and should they need a source othern than photographs of Nagano, He Gave an Order by F. J. Bradley does have a few pages on the subject.--179.6.30.195 (talk) 20:23, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orders and decorations 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below.  Dekimasuよ! 07:16, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Osami Nagano →  – This admiral's name is 永野(Nagano) 修身(Osami) in Japanese. Requesting a swap with its redirect page Nagano Osami to make the title in LN-GN order in line with other similar articles. Yiba (talk | contribs) 13:13, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Japan has been notified of this discussion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:16, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 April 2022
Talk:Shimada Shigetaro

message: 小磯国昭（Koiso Kuniaki）も阿南惟幾（Anami Korechika）も、ちゃんと記事が存在しています。Sh 05:44, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: &#23567;&#30959;&#22269;&#26157;&#12392;&#38463;&#21335;&#24799;&#24190;
Talk:Hamish and Dougal

message: I'd be pretty surprised if these sketches in ISIHAC weren't rehearsed beforehand. The concept of the round pretty much makes it impossible to play without the participants knowing in which direction they're going with the charade. Varitek 07:00, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Rehearsal

message: I wonder if anybody's made a note of the first time H&D appeared on ISIHAC?  Would make a good encyclopedic addition.  Joe D (t) 20:31, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the first time Barry and Grahame used Scottish accents in a Sound Charades sketch (from I'm Sorry I Haven't A Clue - Live), but they were named Denzil and Alec. Daibhid C 16:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First appearance 

message: I've just found a clip on Youtube of Barry playing a Hamish on 'The Good Old Days'/  I'm not sure when the clip is from, but TGOD ended in 1983 Dupont Circle (talk) 21:48, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not the first time Barry had played a Hamish

message: The review section needs work.  It gives positive and negative reviews, but the quotes feel cherry picked, and it's hard to tell whether they give a fair impression of the whole review.  Ideally I'd re-write it so it summarised the opinions, but the reviews aren't online.  Does anyone have access to the reviews so they could make it fairer? 144.32.128.51 (talk) 17:53, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review section
Talk:Order of the Red Banner

message: - Just confirming; is "cartouche" the correct word? Or would "cartouche (design)" be more accurate? I'm sure there are other words to describe specific components of medals, and similar items such as metal law enforcement badges, where a banner or other such adornments would designate an ID number or division, etc.
Also, your edit now references the medal itself, whereas the previous version seemed to refer to the ribbon, or "basic badge", at least, that's what was being discussed on the other page. And there you did state that multiple awardees have subsequent, numbered medals. But, what about the ribbons? Do they just wear multiple copies of the same ribbon? You say there is no numeral devices, is there anything that distinguishes additional awards? Thanks - wolf 22:04, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch on cartouche, I missed the disambiguator. I referenced the medal because it is in fact only on the medal as additional awards differ in this way (see ). The cartouche for repeated awards can even be seen on Natalya Meklin's chest in this postwar photo in civvies, but note the identical ribbons.  Kges1901 (talk) 00:53, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple awards 
Talk:Natchez Trace Parkway

message: Importance
Mid importance to Roads; higher importance to state projects. The Nachez Parkway is well known in AL, MS, and TN but not necessarily outside these states. 
Quality
The article is Structured, Sourced, Linked, and Infoboxed with additional supporting images.  It needs some more development including a listing of significant historical points along the road and additional references.SBaker43 (talk) 21:20, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled comments

message: OK guys, I don't know how to edit it myself (because I'm a newbie), but these pictures are WAY too big. They may be great shots and all, but their extremely large size is very detracting to the article. I'd help out if I knew how, I just figured this should be pointed out to someone who knows more than me. Oughgh 04:57, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  photos 

message: The last mile marker I saw at the end gate of this road in Tennessee is 442. I suspect it is 442 and a half miles in length.64.234.100.114 (talk) 00:56, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This road is NOT 444 miles long. 

message: Would somebody please add a map of this route? Thank you. deisenbe (talk) 15:07, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
File talk:Map of the Epping line, Melbourne.jpg

message: I drew it from the Melways as best I could.
While I was in OpenOffice I worked as if it were 10 percent.
The lines are 0.4 cm long each, and may not be to scale or even show the 'right' direction. I just thought north and west. In particular, stations may appear further away than they really are. I am sure I need to do some 'flipping around' too so that Rushall is the start and the line really does go TO Epping.
Now how do I make Epping Line smaller without compromising readibility, or indeed image quality?
Other features of the image include Zone 1 and Zone 2 colouring.
Also the image was created on June 27 2004.
EuropracBHIT 07:55, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: About Epping Line (the image)
Talk:Mellotron

message: It seems that Emerson, Lake & Palmer used an M400 very, very briefly. This source has an extract from a mid-'90s interview for Sound on Sound magazine:
:
Probably not sufficiently notable to add? Martinevans123 (talk) 15:10, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've known about that source for years, but as you say, I don't think it's significant to add. The only clearly documented evidence of Keith Emerson performing on a Mellotron is the B-Side to "America", "Diamond Hard Blue Apples of the Moon". As you're probably aware, "Notable users" sections of instrument articles have a tendency to attract a bloat, and I'd much rather address 's concerns mentioned in the above thread. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:12, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, of course very nice. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:17, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds a heck of a lot better than my worn out and scratched vinyl copy! Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:18, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  ELP 

message: I'm not sure it's fair (or even relevant, really) to say that Moraz "popularized" the Orchestron, given that the Orchestron was never popular. And imho Kraftwerk made more notable use of it anyway. 68.100.121.207 (talk) 15:06, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I reworded this as I agree with your point here. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:56, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orchestron, Moraz 

message: Some information about the tape used in the instruments would be useful. Is it standard ¼-inch tape, or wider? At what nominal speed was it drawn past the heads? 87.75.117.183 (talk) 03:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It depends on the model. I suspect the reason it's not in the article is simply nobody has found a reliable source for it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:37, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tape specifications  

message: But tape stores a digital signal. Am I missing something here? Is it a different kind of tape? jp×g🗯️ 18:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've rewritten this sentence so it's clearer. Essentially, the sound comes from old-school tape, and has nothing to do with sampling (music) that started appearing in the 1980s. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:36, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I see. Thanks for the clarification :) jp×g🗯️ 01:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital tape is analog?
Talk:D'ni Ages

message: I proposed merging the info from Art (Myst) into this article.  I suggest we direct discussion to that page's talk (Talk:Art (Myst)) for convenience. SFT | Talk 06:56, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Initially, many believed that the Ages visited in the Myst game were different time stages of Myst Island, but later knowledge revealed this was a mistaken view.
Mention what knowledge you're talking about, please. I've seen nothing to indicate that Myst's ages are not intended to be different time periods of the same place. Various clues throughout the journals and visuals make it clear that this is actually the case. These clues are mentioned in other articles on the ages.
--- Vstarre 08:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: By later knowledge we mean the knowledge of the Myst universe and the release of novels, which make clear that each Age is a different universe, not another timeframe. What 'clues' you mention to claim your view that the Ages are not different universes, ut different times? Pictureuploader 09:24, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What later knowledge? 

message: I have changed the redirect of this page to the subsection Ages in the article D'ni. This is to more accurately reflect the information that was previously available when clicking on the Wikilink to "D'ni Ages". If the reader wishes to know more about the D'ni people, they can scroll up to the top of the "D'ni" page, after reading about "D'ni Ages", which is the page that they requested first. -- OranL (talk) 07:03, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Redirect
Talk:Baron Napier of Magdala

message: David Beamish's site gives the accent, but Burke's and Cracroft's don't, so I assume it's not actually there. Proteus (Talk) 11:50, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It is used in The London Gazette, as shown here. Tryde (talk) 06:45, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lord Napier

message: This needs to be moved to Lord Napier, but I can't do it. Proteus (Talk) 11:55, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: Try as I might, I can find no source to substantiate this claim:
"The Napier family is descended from Margaret, daughter of Donnchadh, Earl of Lennox (executed in 1425; see the Earl of Lennox)."
There are several problems with it.  One is that the Napier family long predates Donnchadh, its earliest mention in Scotland having occurred in 1290. source - Clan Napier web page  Secondly, The only direct connection I can find to Donnchadh was that the third laird of Merchiston, John Napier of Rusky, married Elizabeth Mentieth, a great-granddaughter of Donnchadh, source and it is from her that the Napiers had claim to the Earldom of Lennox.
Accordingly, I have edited the page to more accurately reflect the origins of the Napier family.  LeeNapier 21:28, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Margaret