Talk:Emma Groves

message: --Domer48'fenian' 19:30, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

message: Referenced sources were provided, if alternative sources refute them, they should be included. Regards --Domer48 18:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: six minutes in. Not for the faint hearted.--Vintagekits 00:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Its not a question of whether or not the material has sources - its the way in which the article and material therein is presented: Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Before reverting again, please check the comments included in my edits. Thanks. --Mal 07:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "There were several edits I made that were undone wholescale with no consideration for merit on individual basis." Explaine your actions before removing material, this information is referenced! --Domer48 07:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion of bias 

message: Emma Groves devoted her life to the fight against plastic bullets. It therefore played a signifying and notable part. The information is therefore relevant. Do not remove this information, it is considered vandalism.  Just because you do not like it is hardly a reason. --Domer48 07:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The information is therefore relevant 

message: I was asked to look at this article. The way it currently looks, I thought at first it was a user page. It doesn't look like an article. It is a biographical article, so should concentrate on that. The poster shouldn't be there, unless it is specifically related to her (or the organisation she co-founded), not just about plastic bullets in general. If it does relate to her, this needs to be stated in the article and/or poster caption. The same goes for the plastic bullet table. This is not an article about plastic bullets: that already exists and the table is in it. The only justification for including it is if it specifically relates to her, not just to plastic bullets in general: there is no indication that this is the case. Same thing goes with "additional reading". Unless it helps the reader to find out more about her specifically and her particular situation, then it is inappropriate. Maybe one or two books about the troubles if it covers her general environment etc, but that's about it. At the moment this looks more like a campaign blog than an encyclopedia article. However, there should be more factual information about her in it, and her organisation for that matter. A small section about plastic bullets could probably be justified, as the implement is key to her story and it would help the reader to understand better what happened to her, with a link to the main article on the subject in the normal way. Tyrenius 16:11, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that Tyrenius. At last a clear reasoned point. Yes the poster is connected to both Emma and the campaign, and the chart likewise. I will compile the additional information and place it in the article. Thanks again Regards --Domer48 17:34, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

text: What Tyrenius has said is exactly the view I had initially take with regard to this article. There is virtually no difference between the rationale behind my initial edits and Tyrenius' summation. --Mal 21:31, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Tyrenius said "If it does relate to her, this needs to be stated in the article and/or poster caption. The same goes for the plastic bullet table." I said quit clearly that "the poster is connected to both Emma and the campaign, and the chart likewise. I will compile the additional information and place it in the article." What part of that did you not understand? --Domer48 21:41, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is my opinion that your edits are POV motivated, that is why they lack any sence of meaning. I will just work away on the material and when I add it, it will containe a lot more information that is going to pop your cork, it will be referenced, and the first peep out of you about bias, I will put a list together of your biased edits! And let our peers decide! So carry on my gallent comrade, carry on! --Domer48 21:54, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you pull the other one, it has bells. --Domer48 22:17, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Outside view

message: This article has been the topic of a request at Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests#Emma groves. Please review any advice or comments offered by the EAR team. --Kudpung (talk) 09:18, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Editor Assistance Requests

message: This article has been the topic of a request at Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests#Emma groves. Please review any additional advice or comments offered by the EAR team. --Kudpung (talk) 12:39, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editor Assistance Requests 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Emma Groves. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070410173418/http://www.irelandclick.com:80/emma.html to http://www.irelandclick.com/emma.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070715055507/http://www.hrw.org/campaigns/nireland98/bullet.htm to http://hrw.org/campaigns/nireland98/bullet.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:45, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified