Talk:Social exclusion

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.scribd.com/doc/51271676/1/The-Task-of-Evaluation-and-Assessment. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.   — CactusWriter (talk) 20:29, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I would say that the relocaiton of Five Civilized Tribes was a case of naked notorious social exclusion. any other similar cases. Jackzhp 15:36, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was primarily an economic exclusion, IMHO. Guido den Broeder (talk) 09:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: cases

message: Well, since the template suggesting that this article should be merged with marginalization has been here since 22 February and nobody has protested I will do it now.
Åkebråke (talk) 14:24, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging with Marginalization

message: Hello all,
I've gone through the entire article and made significant edits that I believe make the piece more usable. I will use parts of it for a handout I'm giving out to students for a lecture, and I think it will meet that purpose. I think the tone is now more scientific / encyclopedic, and lots of the repetition has been removed. Tarek (talk) 09:33, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major edits and cleanup 

message: *  Oppose - This concentrates on social rejection at an interpersonal level, and is highly specific to that subject. Merging with the exclusion article risks losing the specificity of this article and reduces awareness. Lucas "nicatronTg" Nicodemus (talk) 19:47, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: agree --Penbat (talk) 19:54, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Also agree —AeroNHZach (talk) 02:56, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with exclusion proposal 

message: I have just removed the vandalistic edits that were made by  to this article, although I am amazed that no one else ever reviewed those edits. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 17:47, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed factual errors 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Social exclusion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20121005033805/http%3A//stage.pewforum.org/uploadedFiles/Topics/Issues/Government/RisingTide%2DSHI.pdf to http://stage.pewforum.org/uploadedFiles/Topics/Issues/Government/RisingTide-SHI.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060822092414/http://www.cepr.net/publications/social_exclusion_2006_08.pdf to http://www.cepr.net/publications/social_exclusion_2006_08.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:45, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Social exclusion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080827041209/http://www1.salvationarmy.org.uk/seeds to http://www.salvationarmy.org.uk/seeds
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130117133555/http://www.lavoro.gov.it/Lavoro/CIES/ to http://www.lavoro.gov.it/Lavoro/CIES/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929101857/http://urbact.eu/document-library/virtual-files/childhood/france/situation-of-single-parent-households-headed-by-wo.html to http://urbact.eu/document-library/virtual-files/childhood/france/situation-of-single-parent-households-headed-by-wo.html
*Added  tag to http://est1.lebenslanges-lernen.at/est/product_show.php?id_project=2012-1-IT2-GRU06-37589-0&id_product=JOINT_26
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This cited paragraph was removed without discussion here - I see no reason for the removal as of now. Can we please discussion here before a decision is made? Jooojay (talk) 16:48, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Consequences of Social Exclusion / Health

message: (Following content, added by user 83.209.134.101, moved from Article to Talk page. 18:56, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal opinions/suggestions for improvement moved from article to talk page