Talk:Rose Bowl (stadium)

message: Should this article be 
 to Rose Bowl Stadium? The official site refers to it as such. jareha 17:35, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Althought I'm not affilated with Wikipedia nor the stadium, I think we we keep the page as is.  Most people just call the facility the Rose Bowl.--BigMac1212 02:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rose Bowl Stadium

message: It's a bit ironic that the picture used has USC markings in the endzones. If anyone comes up with another image, perhaps unmarked or with the home team's markings on the field, feel free to upload it. ••\\/\//esleyPinkha//\/\\•• 21:54, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: USC fans traditionally call it their second home, so I see no problem. ;-)  But seriously, the RB used to be only for the invited teams until UCLA moved out of the LA Coliseum (which has been USC's home stadium) in the early 1980s.  The term "2nd home" comes from the fact that USC has been invited to the Rose Bowl Game more than any other team.  This photo appears to have been taken from Google Earth, which due to delays in their photography, also has Dolphin Stadium in Miami also marked with USC in the endzone.  This photo is the 2003 RB game, the Dolphin Stadium photo was from the 2002 Orange Bowl Game.  If you cound the LA Coliseum, USC has its name painted on three different stadiums in Google Earth as of this comment. --Bobak 16:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a very nice picture at http://www.uclahistoryproject.ucla.edu/Fun/images/AugRosebowl2L.jpg as part of the UCLA history project. It shows the field painted for Michigan and UCLA for the 1983 Rose Bowl game. That might be appropriate. I am not quite up to speed on the fair use as it applies to public university photographs. It is on this article  Any thoughts? Group29 18:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As a weird coincidence, that Jan. 1, 2004 sat photo is actually pretty close to accurate as of today's Rose Bowl game. --Bobak 20:54, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

text: this picture has been removed. Group29 14:36, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture from Google

message: Special:Contributions/71.130.195.118 and User:3bulletproof16 are having an edit war over the Junior Rose Bowl, which is also known as the Pasadena Bowl.
Such a game did exist, and a bit of googling finds the information 
Pasadena Bowl (Junior Rose Bowl -- 1967); Pasadena, California
Results: 
*December 18, 1971: Memphis 28, San Jose State 9
*December 19, 1970: Long Beach State 24, Louisville 24
*December 6, 1969: San Diego State 28, Boston University 7
*December 2, 1967: West Texas A&M 35, Cal State Northridge 13
The missing 1968 score can be found in the Wikipedia article. 
A bit deeper digging will turn up individual junior colleges' sports pages where they report that they went to the event. There may be no single web page that shows the scores and who organized it. But certainly it was a real and notable thing. Group29 12:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Junior Rose Bowl Edit War

message: There are two info boxes which are not mutually exclusive, yet do not mesh well in this article. One is for the National register of historic places, the other is for stadiums. I put the NRHP inside the stadium, but that looks only slightly better than the two boxes with different widths. I will put a message on that template discussion page to ask what to do when faced with both? Group29 17:06, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Info boxes

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 08:23, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: I am disputing over the venue dates after 2010 over these 4 stadiums as the BCS contract appears to be up in 2010 but the templates go to 2018. The discussion can be seen at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#BCS Stadium Templates trough 2018  Sawblade05  (talk to me | my wiki life) 22:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. AUTiger » talk 00:26, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy Dispute of [[BCS National Championship Game]] Venues

message: * Yes, this is a better picture. Ucla90024 (talk) 22:37, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: * Yoo-hoo... --Bobak (talk) 00:15, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: I don't want to start an edit war, but it seems to me that the consideration of the Dodgers playing at the Rose Bowl after their 1958 move to L.A. is a legitimate item to include in the article. Any pro/con discussion? DrBear (talk) 18:17, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dodgers' non-move included? 

message: http://www.fifa.com/tournaments/archive/tournament=103/edition=4644/matches/match=22183/report.html
This is the reference website for the attendance of 90185 people 
FIFA Women's World Cup USA 1999  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RosenPopov (talk • contribs) 02:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most attended game in Women Football(Soccer) 

message: * There is no such thing as "Tournament of Roses" event; we have the Rose Parade and the Rose Bowl game. The term Tournament of Roses is referred the association. Ucla90024 (talk) 17:12, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure there is.  The Tournament of Roses covers the events leading up to the parade (Bandfest, etc.), the parade and the game.  It's all organized by the Tournament of Roses Association.  It's just not as commonly used as the names of the individual events.  See the Tournament website at http://www.tournamentofroses.com/pasadena-tournament-of-roses Drmargi (talk) 17:27, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I reverted your latest edit.  The Tournament is an event.  It can't decide there was a need for a larger stadium.  The Tournament Association did that.  You need to read up on the Tournament of Roses so you're more familiar with the various terms and entities involved.  Drmargi (talk) 06:20, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  There are trademark names that you can use, such as "Tournament of Roses Parade", Etc. Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 23:39, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Tournament of Roses

message: Looks like a USC supported wanted to take a dig at the UCLA program by posting a picture of UCLA's 28-7 loss to USC at the Rose Bowl a while back. Let's keep this nonsense off of Wikipedia and post less antagonistic image of the stadium. Until someone supplies such a photo, let's keep the USC-UCLA stuff off the page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.184.64.78 (talk) 20:52, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Panoramic picture of USC-UCLA game at Rose Bowl

message: * This article is about the Rose Bowl, whose primary function is the football games, namely the Rose Bowl game. It was built by the Pasadena Tournament of Roses. There is a limitation on how many concerts it can do each year. This year an exception has been made to have the 7 concerts plus the soccer game. Normally, it would not have been allowed to have so many events in additional to the football games. This is not a billboard chart for industrial purposes and should belong to a concert page. Therefore there is no inerest in gross profit in the concerts. The stadium can sit over 90,000 and with floor seating, it can go much higher. Therefore the ratio of actual concert goers vs. capacity is of no imporance. A simple attenance figure will do. Ucla90024 (talk) 02:07, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Concerts

message: The 1994 World Cup is not a "tenant" of the Rose Bowl, it is an event that the Rose Bowl was a host venue for out of several others. A tenant is a team or organization that uses the stadium regularly as their home field, such as the Rose Bowl Game and UCLA football. Tenants often have offices within the stadium itself and have some degree of say over any physical changes made to the stadium and/or overall scheduling even if they don't own the stadium outright. The World Cup had several events held at the Rose Bowl, but not only was it a temporary thing, the majority of WC games were held elsewhere. The same goes for Super Bowls, championship games, Wrestlemania, and other events that are just there for a very short time. While significant, they aren't tenants, even if they happen every year or multiple years. Stadiums host dozens of significant events every year (the Rose Bowl in particular) and over their lifetime. If we list every notable event held at the Rose Bowl, then the tenant list will be unreasonably longer. The World Cup should be listed, but within the body of the article just like the 1999 Women's World Cup is. --JonRidinger (talk) 21:55, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Jweiss11 (talk) 22:30, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tenants 

message: The extensive list of soccer games has been removed twice and should not return. The Rose Bowl hosts numerous athletic events and soccer is but one, so listing every soccer game opens the article to have every event ever played at the stadium listed, which would completely overwhelm the article. The soccer list as it was already took up a significant amount of space and put undue weight on the soccer matches, which has been an issue at many other stadium articles too. The most important soccer games played there all have their own articles and links to those remain in this article, so details of the game are not appropriate here. We wouldn't make a detailed list of every Rose Bowl game for this article, so why soccer? Why not all the stats for the Super Bowl games played here, or UCLA's football games? --JonRidinger (talk) 23:08, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soccer 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Rose Bowl (stadium). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090907115147/http://www.rosebowlstadium.com/RoseBowl_history.htm to http://www.rosebowlstadium.com/RoseBowl_history.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070814001636/http://www.tournamentofroses.com/roseparade/paradefaqs.asp to http://www.tournamentofroses.com/roseparade/paradefaqs.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090907115147/http://www.rosebowlstadium.com/RoseBowl_history.htm to http://www.rosebowlstadium.com/RoseBowl_history.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151113133651/http://www.rosebowlstadium.com/legacy/keith-jackson-broadcast-center to http://www.rosebowlstadium.com/legacy/keith-jackson-broadcast-center
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080522115924/http://www.sports-venue.info/NCAAF/Bowls/T_Rose_Bowl_Timeline.html to http://www.sports-venue.info/NCAAF/Bowls/T_Rose_Bowl_Timeline.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070903190129/http://www.college.columbia.edu/cct/jul05/obituaries2.php to http://www.college.columbia.edu/cct/jul05/obituaries2.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121119011327/http://www.uclabruins.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/111712aab.html to http://www.uclabruins.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/111712aab.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:05, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Rose Bowl (stadium). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080120092641/http://www.mgoblue.com/facilities/article.aspx?id=28642 to http://www.mgoblue.com/facilities/article.aspx?id=28642
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:59, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:23, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Is there a specific reason "association football" is spelt out as a section title, rather than "soccer" as expected for an American stadium? If not, I will revise. –Zfish118⋉talk
:I changed back to "soccer" per MOS:TIES.—Bagumba (talk) 21:00, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Association football vs soccer 

message: — Assignment last updated by ProfHobbit (talk) 17:25, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Writing 1 TR Both Classes