Talk:Energy security

message: In the next few days, I will be reviewing the article and will make some changes to improve the article.  Kgrr (talk) 17:27, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvements

message: In the next few days this page will soon get a significant revision and subsequent editing from students participating in the Public Policy Initiative. This article was chosen because it is missing content or sourcing and has been relatively innactive. Their draft articles are being formed in their user space and will be transfered here. Links to the drafts can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject United States Public Policy/Courses/Political Economy of Technology and Science fall 2010. I will not be allowing students to that first initial transfer unless their article has been significantly improved in references and content. Please provide comments on the significant revisions and help the students improve the Wikipedia formatting. However, I would greatly appreciate that any major content changes be suggested to the students on the talk page so that they get the experience editing collaboratively and through consensus and feedback. The final date for the project is Friday December 10, expect significant editing from now until then. Thank you. 
If you have any questions feel free to raise them here or on my talk page, Myself and other WP:Online Ambassadors will be monitoring their edits, so we will also be able to help fix issues on the pages, Sadads (talk) 01:18, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: School project edits

message: * http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/10/26/business/energy-environment/the-energy-map.html published: October 25, 2011 
* http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/26/business/energy-environment/future-of-solar-and-wind-power-may-hinge-on-federal-aid.html 
* http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/26/business/energy-environment/new-technologies-redraw-the-worlds-energy-picture.html
97.87.29.188 (talk) 23:06, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of these maybe appropriate for Energy in the United States.  99.190.85.15 (talk) 03:34, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[New York Times]] resource 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Energy security. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070131235718/https://bennett.senate.gov/press/record.cfm?id=226465 to http://bennett.senate.gov/press/record.cfm?id=226465
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070222090947/http://money.cnn.com:80/2007/02/15/news/companies/bush_biofuel.reut/index.htm? to http://money.cnn.com/2007/02/15/news/companies/bush_biofuel.reut/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Substituted at 14:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Dr. Molyneaux has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Molyneaux has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:
*Reference : Lynette Molyneaux & Liam Wagner & Craig Froome & John Foster, 2012. "Resilience and electricity systems: a comparative analysis," Energy Economics and Management Group Working Papers 15, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 13:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Molyneaux's comment on this article 

message: There are certain areas of concern in this article including, references, citations, value statements, and a general lack of cohesion.
In terms of references, there are several citations that are lacking, do not work, or lead to poor quality sources, such as youtube.
An example is citation #2: " Michael Ruppert (2009). Collapse. Event occurs at 27:50. There are ten calories of hydrocarbon energy in every calorie of food consumed in the industrialized world."
And here are some statements that are lacking citations:
*"Russia is the current leading country in production of natural gas.[citation needed]"
*"One of the biggest problems currently facing natural gas providers is the ability to store and transport it. With its low density, it is difficult to build enough pipelines in North America[clarification needed] to transport sufficient natural gas to match demand. These pipelines are reaching near capacity and even at full capacity do not produce the amount of gas needed.[citation needed]"
Furthermore, the phrasing of information relies too heavily on value statements, taking the article away from a neutral tone. 
Here are some examples: "Perhaps most alarmingly, peak oil expert Michael Ruppert has claimed that for every calorie of food produced in the industrial world, ten calories of oil and gas energy are invested in the forms of fertilizer, pesticide, packaging, transportation, and running farm equipment.[2]"
*"These classes of ship provide the core of the Navy's power, and as such are the single most noteworthy application of nuclear power in that country."
These issues coupled with fragmented information causes a lack of cohesion, thus the article needs added information or rephrasing to tie the topics together.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Energy_security --Kepanian (talk) 00:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi! Glad that you came by to critique the article. I adjusted the spacing on your comment a bit. I would highly recommend taking the opportunity to update the article yourself: both your feedback, and the expert review above have some very actionable edits, that would be great, in terms of changing the tone of the article and providing better research to support the page. Sadads (talk) 02:52, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: @Sadad thank you for the help, I am still learning all the different options available in writing on Wikipedia. I do plan on addressing these issues and adding more information on Energy Security to what is already mentioned in the article. I want to emphasize the focus on the overall problem of energy security as an efficiency issue, using the logic that natural resources are characterized typically as a common pool resource or a public access good. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common-pool_resourcehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_resource#ManagementOnce clarifying the problem involved in energy security, I will add more coverage on the existing solutions varying reliable sources discuss on energy security, including natural resource management and alternative energy to convey how countries can or plan to address energy security as an institutional market failure. Kepanian (talk) 18:39, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Student project

message: The IPCC WG3 AR5 Report contains useful material on energy security.  The IPCC defines energy security as:
In addition, section 6.6.2.2 on p475 covers the topic of energy security in more detail.  Someone might like to work this information into the article.  Best wishes.  RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 13:56, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  IPCC Fifth Assessment Report 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Energy security. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090626182130/http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103 to https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&sid=aXb5iuqdZoD4&refer=us
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130625170748/http://www.life.illinois.edu/delucia/Publications/Davis%20LCA%20TiPS.pdf to http://www.life.illinois.edu/delucia/Publications/Davis%20LCA%20TiPS.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070614110708/http://www.colorado.edu/law/eesi/ to http://www.colorado.edu/law/eesi
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928204423/http://www.usembassy.at/en/download/pdf/nato_energy.pdf to http://www.usembassy.at/en/download/pdf/nato_energy.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:03, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Should the definition of energy security be broader? Given for example, the Sustainable Development Goals, which list access to energy for all as a goal. (see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sustainable_Development_Goals#Goal_7:_Affordable_and_clean_energy)Accon4 (talk) 16:31, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broader definition