Talk:Birmingham/Archive 6

message: Andy, you have deleted the first part of my war history, I have not reverted yet, please try and provide me with a reason for your edit at least. Thanks Nick Boulevard 22:53, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Andy Mabbots reverts war history

message: Andy Mabbett is now officially spying on me, he has weeded through many of my contributions and is now listing them as copyright violations, instead of helping by simply removing the violation or re writing from scratch the part that is in question he has set about another snake like endevour to destroy my work, it won't wash Andy, I am sorry but you simply are not going to do this, I will remove myself what is copywright violation and completely re-write to save so much effort and not just on my part (sigh), I have written to Virtual Brum to see if they mind me using a few sentences from their site as a start. Nick Boulevard 19:33, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copywright Violations

message: What is to be done about the one user who repeatedly reverts any edits to "his" (sic) page, claiming to be reverting "vandalism", but actually reinstating typos, spelling- and factual errors? Andy Mabbett 08:07, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Keep editing, revert back to the improved article after Nick has restored all the spelling mistakes and errors, refuse to take part in personal arguments.  That is what I think he's after - I think if you added up the number of words he's put on talk pages and compared them to the number of words he's put into Wikipedia articles, there would be very many more of the first lot, especially if you ignored all the stuff copied and pasted from other places and the obvious factual errors and stuff that doesn't make any sense.  He's using this place as a substitute for usenet or a chat board.  He'll be lucky to escape a ban for all those copyright violations, so the problem might just go away.
Oh Andy (both posts), lsten to yourself, you take this place way too seriously like it's your own magazine that you need to have full and total control over and yet you actually contribute little to the Bham page other than question everything I add and delete what you don't care for like the canal wall and selly park graffiti gallery etc, I probably have made copyright errors along my travels here but of those you have painstakingly sifted through (which must have been enjoyable) I have removed the text in question, I have added barrels of original material to this page and others which many people have edited and re-worded better IMO and I do get a little over protective at times due to the fact that alot of it (mainly culture) is of my own doing, no big deal and I won't stand in the way of progress but I will stop vandelism and deletion of relevant articles whether I have written it or not, I can't even be bothered to go into why you are pretending to be lots of different people and regards being banned, I see you have already been banned for deleting others work you even tried reverting my own personal user page at one point? (see your talk page) and the fact that you tried to force me into mediation on the Brummie page didn't work either as it was regarded as serious enough. Nick Boulevard 20:07, 25 May 2005 (UTC)

text: Note User talk:Nick Boulevard#Vandalism. Andy Mabbett 23:47, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Abusive reverts

message: There has been absolutely no discussion on talk since this article was protected well over a week ago, so I have unprotected it. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 08:19, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Unprotected