lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ramelteon

message: Can anyone find the ATC Code?  I could not find this information from a Google Search nor from goverment websites (i.e. NIH, FDA).  Yendor 07:04, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section 1 

message: I added a short paragraph about the significance of the MT3 receptor -- or lack thereof. I don't want to bogart anybody's article. If you think my facts are wrong, please speak up. Bigvalleytim 05:43, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  MT receptors 

message: I know nothing about this drug, just looking it up because I saw it being advertised ad nauseum...  While the above efforts helped, this page still seems very much like it's the company line.  I encourage anyone who is familiar with pharmeceuticals and drug studies to write a less POVish article.
Eeblet 17:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What exactly do you mean? Which parts do you feel could be improved? Fvasconcellos 17:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still in need of more critical perspective? 

message: Is this verifiable what-so-ever? Until someone digs something up, I'm taking it off. 70.209.143.100 17:34, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recreational Use 

message: There is no mention of this receptor in the Melatonin receptor article. MrPMonday (talk) 04:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: MT3 Receptor

message: There needs to be a section on adverse effect, like hyperprolactinaemia and cancer in animal studies.
There is no mention of the negilible effect: it does only reduce time to sleep by 10 minutes!
Source: Prescrire International Oct. 2008 vol 17 no 97 pg 183-186 --84.137.108.248 (talk) 08:47, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adverse Effects / Poor effectiveness 

message: The paragraph entitled Drug Interactions is not referenced at all.  In addition, under Sources and external links there is a medscape link relating to Midazolam:  I looked up the full text of this article and could not find a single reference to Ramelteon or Rozerem. 121.220.130.33 (talk) 19:02, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Provided details on my talk page. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:22, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources missing or irrelevant 

message: Hmmm, 7th of April or 4th of July.  This being the USA, I assume the FDA takes the 4th of July off, so they approved the drug in April 2005? (Gosh, was it that long ago?) One has to be a detective to figure out dates written like that.  Except for today, of course!  {smile}    --Hordaland (talk) 17:47, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  " FDA approved 07.04.05 , ..." 

message: What's the addiction and abuse risk of this substance A8v (talk) 23:54, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  addiction risk
Talk:Earth Girls Are Easy

message: Was this influenced by Voyage of the Rock Aliens?Halbared (talk) 11:55, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Voyage of the Rock Aliens
Talk:Spiced beer

message: Would the oysters used in Oyster Stout be a "spice"?  What about chocolate in chocolate stout? Naerhu 05:43, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

message: Since this is being presented under the beer styles catagory, I tried to reword this so as make it clear that not all beers that contain spices are really "spiced beer" by style. Since it's so vague, it's really hard to pin this style down. Hopefully, I've cleared things up a bit.Frank 20:39, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spiced Beer as a Style

message: I just added a few from the top of my head that seemed to be major commercial examples. Really, all I have is American micros (and one Japanese) so it'd be nice if someone filled in some examples from elsewhere.Frank 20:59, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Commercial Examples
Talk:The Kinks discography

message: Why are the 70s singles missing and there are two entries for the 1960s
2001:569:BCD6:2C00:DC2B:E64C:1C39:865D (talk) 22:28, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singles 

message: I notice the singles' tables are missing BPI singles certifications, although there are about 10 of them, for digital singles. I did not add them since the table is already too wide. If someone feels otherwise it can easily be done. --Muhandes (talk) 18:26, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  BPI certifications for singles 

message: This list gives  Where have all the good times gone?, a 1965 single, as coming after Sweet Lady Genevieve in 1973 - there's nothing in the song's article that  supports this. am I missing something? - DavidWBrooks (talk) 12:39, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong listing? 

message: The article states that The Kinks Greatest Hits was certified Gold due to selling 1 million units in the US but that amount is solely designated for Platinum recognition.  So how many copies of this was actually sold here?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoeWiki1969 (talk • contribs) 12:22, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gold & Platinum certification 

message: I am no expert, nor even competent, but there is what looks like a lot of raw HTML on this page The Kinks discography
I don't exactly know what to call it, but much of the page is unreadable (although much is readable with functional links). I have never seen anything like this on any wikipedia page. Bill.pollard (talk) 18:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I fixed it. An IP editor tried to add content, but it did not work out so well. Tkbrett (✉) 18:47, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page unreadable
Talk:Misty Mundae

message: I've moved the three pictures that were stacked haphazardly beneath the one that is currently in the infobox, mainly because it made it look too crowded. Their placement into the article itself could obviously use some work even from where I've moved them but at least the infobox doesn't look so odd with them beneath the other picture now. 75.2.52.75 19:29, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Pictures 

message: This article needs to be merged into Erin Brown as the two articles refer to the same person, and the content is nearly identical. Also this article contains weasel words, especially in the text talking about her change in movie genre. For discussion, see the discussion page on Talk:Erin Brown.
Autopilots 05:23, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Weasel Words and Merge
Talk:Rough Crossing

message: *Start class - Minor formatting changes needed to conform with Wikipedia:WikiProject_Theatre/Article_Structure guidelines.  Need Play Infobox, and if available,  History, Reception, and Analysis headings.
*Low importance - a single play constitutes a "highly specific area of knowledge"
--Dereksmootz (talk) 20:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Theatre Assessment
Talk:Stubby Clapp

message: Anyone who's heard of Stubby knows him as "Stubby Clapp," with the possible exception of his immediate family and maybe his personal doctor.  Seems to me this page should be moved to "Stubby Clapp" and away from "Richard Clapp."  I had no idea that his name was Richard until I found this page.
And just as aside, I'm impressed that "Dick Clapp" is a name actually worse than "Stubby Clapp," which I had not thought possible...   Wencer 06:03, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Name
Talk:Marvel Zombies

message: I think, if you have enough time to address all of the above issues, I think you should seriously shorten the plot summary or at least organize it better. Dark Reign, Secret Invasion and Doctor Strange have all been substantially reduced in detail despite their greater significance in Marvel than the series. Although I see it seems to be highly popular, such exceptions should not be made. Aidoflight (talk) 20:17, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organizing 

message: Interesting bit of trivia is that "Marvel Zombies" (capital Z too) was a derogatory term used for much of the eighties by the likes of The Comics Journal and Amazing Heroes to refer to readers who blindly bought Marvel books and only Marvel books, regardless of quality. I don't have a full run of either so it's hard to work out exactly who coined it and the usage, but it could be something interesting to add, especially given the irony of Marvel Zombies who kept buying Marvel Zombies long after the quality dropped off. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 15:01, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Derogatory term
Talk:Theodamas

message: The Greek quoted in this article should be re-transliterated into the Greek alphabet (i.e., into the original). Please see this also. Hydriotaphia 06:09, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have transliterated it.  For sake of readability, I've put it in standard modern capitalization, even though this wouldn't have been how it appeared on the coin, since lowercase letters hadn't been invented yet at that point.  If people think it should be changed, I can change it.  --RobthTalk 23:29, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Young Pioneers of China

message: I wanted to know, is membership mandatory in certain schools or is it on a voluntary basis?
ABart26 12:50, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They join as a group in the second grade if they meet qualifications, and the majority do meet the qualifications, thus whoever wasn't able to join seems almost "stigmatised" in the eyes of other classmates, albeit not from the teachers themselves (it's probably illegal even and could cost the teachers their jobs). Also many new students might enter the school after the 2nd grade and the initiation ceremony, they will have to wait another year until the following year's ceremony to join, if qualified. Non-citizens cannot join; students without household registration could join, but some privileges might be restricted, for example the Three "Goods" (Sānhǎo) awards at the end of the school year is limited to only those Pioneers with proper household registration. I myself entered the school in the second half of third grade, and had to wait until the fourth grade to join, during those months it didn't settle with me that I am the only one in class who didn't have a red scarf or pin, although I don't remember being stigmatised by either the classmates or the teachers for that. I was initiated the following year with the second graders. I don't remember being asked to join, but if I did, I certainly would have replied in the affirmative. To the students it's a privilege to go on camping trips to Inner Mongolia, and basic military training. If anyone doesn't want to join, just behave badly in school and you won't be able! XD --141.156.222.117 23:32, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mandatory or Voluntary? 
Talk:Miss USA

message: Remove: MOXIE Media Productions
Replace: CROWN MOXIE, source: www.crownmoxie.com 
I own both companies, but it's CROWN MOXIE that owns the franchise, produces, and directs the MISS INDIANA USA and MISS INDIANA TEEN USA Pageants. Thank you, JScot Reid, Exec State Director 69.223.58.169 (talk) 21:21, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: here 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 23:15, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 January 2022 

message: Please change "Crown MOXIE Media Productions (Indiana)" to "Crown Moxie, LLC (Indiana)"
Note, that there is no 'media' or 'productions' in our legal name. Thank you.
JScot Reid, owner of Crown Moxie, LLC and the State Director for Miss Indiana USA and Miss Indiana Teen USA
source: Missindianausa.com and crownmoxie.com Crown Moxie (talk) 03:32, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:21, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 May 2022 

message: "The Miss USA 2020 pageant had always usually in the spring or summer schedule," -- What is this supposed to mean?  What is the verb?  "Always usually" can't be right. 2600:6C67:1C00:5F7E:9C6B:5193:60E8:85E1 (talk) 16:35, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to fix that section. I deleted the commentary about the spring/summer vs. fall schedule as it wasn't anywhere in the linked source.  Jojopeanut (talk) 02:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 

message: 72.79.26.151 (talk) 18:27, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Pinchme123 (talk) 03:52, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 August 2023
Talk:List of Somalis

message: There is a discussion on the intended scope of this article here. Aridd (talk) 08:00, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Yahye abdulle Warsame
I was born in beledweyne somalia Warsame t (talk) 20:49, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: a politician from wajir  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.81.61.146 (talk) 20:45, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hussein abdi bare
Talk:Cummerband

message: I am for merging the two articles. It is just means one and the same. Perhaps a picture of a soldier weaing a Cummerband would also add beauty to the article. --Qmsarge 06:19, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the two articles should be merged, provided that they end up under the cummerbund title. PeteVerdon 14:34, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Agreed - merge under cummerbund Goldfinger820 05:29, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Agreed - merge under cummerbund - they seem to be the same thing. GeraldH 16:20, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Merge under cummerbund. -- Miwa * talk * contribs ^_^ 19:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Merge under cummerbund. ▫ UrbaneLegend talk 22:57, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Solera

message: The link for tokay leads to the tokay disambiguation page, instead can we change it to tokaji which is the wine in particular or then to Tokaj-Hegyalja
: Done. Amatulic 19:56, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tokay
Talk:Padang Panjang

message: Oh please! im soo tired to change padangpanjang city name into the right written name as it should be.Everytime i change it into the right names, administrators always canceled it and instantly it become "Padang Panjang" again (separated)...this is wrong!.
Padangpanjang city should be written NOT separated, as "Padangpanjang"...this is the right written of Padangpanjang.
Padangpanjang should NOT written separated as "Padang Panjang"...thats wrong!.
Please look to [indonesian wikipedia] for further recommendation about padangpanjang written names!.
Since i am not administrator in this en.wikipedia, please somebody help me to change the name into the right one it should be, there's so much pages written to the wrong name....it shoud be refer to "Padangpanjang", this is the right name.Somebody plz help to clear this case. 
Thanks for your cooperation.Hendry Allen 06:25, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Padang Panjang (or Padangpadang in Bahasa Indonesia, literally, "'long field'") is located in the cool highlands of West Sumatra.....
--Dodo bird 12:43, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Live All Over the Place

message: What's with all the blue? --Ouro (blah blah) 15:54, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blue 

message: Yes, what's up with the obnoxiously bright blue? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alterego269 (talk • contribs) 10:51, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLUE 

message: The is not a key word, and should not be capitalized. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alterego269 (talk • contribs) 00:34, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 
Talk:Dogman (album)

message: I linked the cover image to this article and updated the image page for fair use here. I also gave this article an introduction and put in some short section tags, hopefully to encourage a little expansion on this article.
Kresock (talk) 03:00, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album cover 
Talk:Family Research Institute

message: I cannot figure out how to edit the summary and the side panel.
According to the summary FRI is deemed an anti-gay hate group by the SPLC. For several years now the SPLC has changed anti-gay to anti-LGBTQ.
The side panel has 2010 revenues.
Revenues for the year ended June 30, 2019 were $50,518.
David Cary Hart (talk) 15:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Required edits
Talk:Operation D-Elite

message: What were they charged with? What was the evidence?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Edibobb (talk • contribs) 16:54, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Need information

message: I believe this article casts a shadow in favor of the raided groups and individuals and further is written an unfittingly informal tone. 06:41, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that some of this has been written in an informal tone.  I may clean it up. Bleu`dove 05:17, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV and unencyclopedic tone

message: Where are the sources? I don't beleive this.
Miserlou 03:26, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What don't you believe?  There is a reference about his sentence. Bleu`dove 05:17, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I put that in. Belief changed.Miserlou 05:59, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Confirmation on this Story/Article Yet 

message: Takedown? Is this the correct word? Sounds very slang-y to me..
::There are a number of closely-related definitions of "takedown" which are close to the described usage: a wrestling/martial arts move that accomplishes forcing one's opponent to the floor; something that can be taken down; a mechanism within that something that can be taken down. The correct term is actually "take down," a discrepancy that is completely worthwhile and basis for a lawsuit against Wikipedia. :P Λι tc Θlοг-Шιlε 00:16, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Basis for a lawsuit? How? Why in the world would somebody sue wikipedia over a word that may be missing a space? Do you actually think a judge will go foward with this? Are you a lawyer? Lets not unneccessarily throw the word "lawsuit" around. It scares people. In any case, [American Heritage http://www.bartleby.com/61/9/T0020900.html] says that a takedown is "The mechanism that allows an article or apparatus to be easily taken down". I think that applies here, but if you feel strongly about it, go ahead and change it. Copysan 09:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Takedown
Talk:Australia at the 1900 Summer Olympics

message: Australia did not come into being until 1901-01-01.  Is there a source for the claim that Australia competed under its own country code in 1900, and not under the UK country code?
: , as well as the IOC medallist database. -- Jonel | Speak 16:30, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Independent code
Talk:Australia at the 1936 Summer Olympics

message: The flag used at the Olympics was the red ensign, not the blue ensign.--93.104.59.250 (talk) 11:23, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag 

message: The layout of this list is a shocker. Is this how it's done on these Olympic articles-Sticks66 11:47, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dear oh dear
Talk:Sabin Bălașa

message: Did not enroled. The cult of the Ceausescu's personalities begin in latest of 70's first of the 80's —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.164.226.133 (talk • contribs) 
say i wanted to insert an image of a sabin balasa painting in the article, under what license would i be able to do that? would i be able to do it at all?IleanaCosanziana 21:14, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Australia at the 1968 Summer Olympics

message: The Eric Pearce the article links to is not the same as the one who carried the flag, I don't know how to fix it, could someone do that.124.178.49.221 08:40, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Was it the Eric Robert Pearce of the field hockey team? -- Jonel | Speak 15:11, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Australia at the 2000 Summer Olympics

message: On the page Australia at the 2000 Summer Olympics the table at the top of the page lists 16 Gold medals for Australia in Sydney (this is accurate!) However the list of gold medal winners only lists 15!
The Men's 4 x 100m Freestyle swimming relay (in world record time) is the one missing. The Australian team was Michael KLIM, Chris FYDLER, Ashley CALLUS, Ian THORPE, Todd PEARSON and Adam PINE. (I'm not certain which 2 dropped out after the heats.
I don't have the skills to correct the article. I would appreciate it if someone who did added the information once it has been verified from sources more reliable than me.
Thanks.
Michael  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.116.118.230 (talk) 08:00, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Omission in Australia's Gold Medal count at the Sydney Olympics 
Talk:Magyk

message: Hi there, this series was first published in the UK by Bloomsbury (and only after that in the US by Harper Collins) I changed this. Arnoutf 13:37, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Originally a UK book

message: As requested on WikiProject Children's Literature, I have checked this article for assessment and agree with the current rating of C class. To improve, I recommend adding more reliable sources, replacing the 'Trivia' section with another section to cover the material, adding a sectino about the book cover to rplace the comments in the lead paragraph, and extending the lead paragraph to provide a more comprehensive summary of the article. If you have any comments on this assessment, please leave them on my talk page. strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 12:22, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: That phrase needs to be changed to be a bit more exact.  In a few years, it will not be accurate anymore. 71.55.136.78 (talk) 22:26, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "...about five years ago." in "Film adaptation" 

message: The summary of the book is currently around 16 paragraphs, instead of the suggested 3 for a novel of this size. What would be the best way to cut this down to a reasonable size?
It seems that there is too many details and tells the exact events instead of summing it up.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.122.61.189 (talk) 03:11, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extensive Summary
Talk:Houghton Lake

message: I've set Houghton Lake (Michigan) to redirect here as the two lakes named Houghton are listed. -Acjelen 07:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that was a very ill-advised split. The one article wil never be more than a short stub. and the other is by far and away the most commonly known Houghton Lake. I am going to revert this split. older ≠ wiser 13:19, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Royal Dutch Football Association

message: The article says - "It was one of the founding members of FIFA in 1904 and the first non-British football association in Europe" but the page used as a citation actually says the Danish Association was "One of the First". The date for the foundation in this article says 8 December 1889. The Page for the Danish Association just says 1889. But on this UEFA page it says Founded on 18 May 1889. http://www.uefa.org/member-associations/association=den/index.html Clearly the Danish Association is older. I will make the change.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.81.244.252 (talk) 21:09, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oldest Association outside of Britain?
Template talk:Warning1

message: I took out the ==Recent Vandalism== after inadvertantly editing here, and seeing that a lot of people had done the same thing.  it seems that the right-hand margin edit link was coming here instead of that section in the article as you would expect.  it no longer does this.  since this is such unexpected behaviour, could this be a bug in template resolving?  stubblyhead | T/c 07:22, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed header