Talk:Xerochrysum bracteatum

message: One for Xerochrysum.
Title: Phylocreny of Australian Gnaphalieae (Asteraceae) based on cloroplast and nuclear sequences, the trnL intron, trnL/trnF Intergenic spacer, matK, and ETS 
Author(s): Bayer RJ, Greber DG, Bagnall NH
Source: SYSTEMATIC BOTANY   Volume: 27   Issue: 4   Pages: 801-814   Published: OCT-DEC 2002 
Times Cited: 28  added. Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:50, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Web of Science searches

message: Yes, I was concerned that the one removed was not bracteatum as well. Hmm, will try to hunt some more. Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:33, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxobox image

message: That's looking MUCH better, though I'm starting to feel a better distinction is needed between characters that are common to the family/tribe and those of the species. I'll have a dig into it when you're done expanding. Circéus (talk) 00:36, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to attack it now. I'll look into how we can get a diagram. Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:45, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A diagram would be best put in Asteraceae. This page has some good illustration to get inspired from. Circéus (talk) 02:29, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

text: One of the problem with writing descriptions is making ones that, if possible, separate the characters that are distinctive from those that are not. At first glance, it seems species in this genus are primarily separated by vegetative characters, so I'll write presuming that. Circéus (talk) 02:51, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

text: re image - Good idea. I can't do that for several hours as I'll be in transit.  re description - hard - you suggested I describe the architecture of the flower, much of which applies to many Asteraceae. The bit about female florets on the edges of the disc applies to the genus Xerochrysum. But feel free to chop and move material betwixt here and higher taxa :) There are a stack of journal articles to check (see above), so it's not as if we'll have a short article or anything.....Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:41, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I've reworked it to try and get a feel of background vs. species-specific content, but I still think the approach is mostly sound. What complicate things a bit is the abovementioned focus on vegetative characteristics to distinguish species in most sources, leaving it unclear what, if any, are the differences in floral morphology (as opposed to phyllaries). A revision-level set of descriptions would be the perfect thing, but I don't think there is one for the genus. Nonetheless I think what we have here is acceptable. Circéus (talk) 05:10, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Description update

message: thumb
Here's a nice image, but thought I'd let a regular editor add it, if you think it's correctly identified.
--Tom Hulse (talk) 22:18, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes indeed it is a cultivar. Nice photo. I am happy we now have an image of the wild plant in the taxobox though. I have been meaning to expand this and nom for GA (also so we can add more pix :))) Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:28, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

text: i.e. so any input/commentary/copyediting/addition of content welcome. Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:33, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If anyone's interested, I've uploaded another half dozen photos of wild plants to Commons.Mark Marathon (talk) 02:00, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible image 

message: Well you asked for some copy edits, so I've already made a bunch of non-controversial ones.  Here are some more to consider:
* Capitalization of non-proper common names such as Golden Everlasting and Australian Painted Lady should perhaps be golden everlasting and Australian painted lady. You alread have blackbutt, strawflowers, etc. as lower case.  
::yep, aiming for all lower case. thank heavens it's not bird-pollinated....Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:06, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: dang, you're right....never thought of that... Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:10, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The Bayer ref notes synonymy, so I appended that there. Will take a look at the original descriptions. Always fun. Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:30, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

text: Tom, I jotted some notes there two weeks ago....cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:07, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor copy edits 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Xerochrysum bracteatum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/97707/Benson_2i.pdf
*Added  tag to http://placanet.org/doc/pdf/Non_latinoamerica_members/Czech%20Rep%20Strawflower%20yellows%202003.pdf
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100911090325/http://www.aussiewinners.com.au:80/infonotes/Bracteantha_Sundaze.htm to http://www.aussiewinners.com.au/infonotes/Bracteantha_Sundaze.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Xerochrysum bracteatum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130203212212/http://www.gardenhistorysociety.org/post/publications/book-reviews/jardin-de-la-malmaison-empress-josephine%E2%80%99s-garden/ to http://www.gardenhistorysociety.org/post/publications/book-reviews/jardin-de-la-malmaison-empress-josephine%E2%80%99s-garden/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:09, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Xerochrysum bracteatum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110320103157/http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/agriculture/horticulture/floriculture/australian-south-african/accepted to http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/agriculture/horticulture/floriculture/australian-south-african/accepted
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified