Talk:Frequency analysis

message: I was not aware that "TH" was an "exceedingly uncommon" letter combination in English.  Apparently people very rarely use words such as "the", "this", "there", and "that".
The page mentions "TH" as common, not uncommon
::Actually, at the time I wrote the above, the text said, "Likewise, ST, NG and QU are common combinations, while TH, XT, NZ and QJ are exceedingly uncommon, or "impossible"."  So you see, it did list TH as uncommon.  However, looking back on it I should have just edited the article.  My only defense is that this was over 2 years ago. Roachmeister 14:28, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: TH?

message: The spelling misteaks was deliberate as a self illustration. Should be put back? Perhaps italicized? ww 15:12, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure that spelling "mistake" as "misteak" really increases the credibility of Wikipedia as a reference work...— Matt 19:44, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: misteaks

message: Just solved the example for fun and decided that it'd be even more fun to spoil it for others. So here's the plaintext:
HEREUPONLEGRANDAROSEWITHAGRAVEANDSTATELYAIRANDBROUGHTMETHEBEETLEFROMAGLASSCASEI
NWHICHITWASENCLOSEDITWASABEAUTIFULSCARABAEUSANDATTHATTIMEUNKNOWNTONATURALISTSOF
COURSEAGREATPRIZEINASCIENTIFICPOINTOFVIEWTHEREWERETWOROUNDBLACKSPOTSNEARONEEXTR
EMITYOFTHEBACKANDALONGONENEARTHEOTHERTHESCALESWEREEXCEEDINGLYHARDANDGLOSSYWITHA
LLTHEAPPEARANCEOFBURNISHEDGOLDTHEWEIGHTOFTHEINSECTWASVERYREMARKABLEANDTAKINGALL
THINGSINTOCONSIDERATIONICOULDHARDLYBLAMEJUPITERFORHISOPINIONRESPECTINGIT
I guess it's meant to be split this way into sentences:
Here upon Legrand. Arose with a grave and stately air and brought me the beetle from a glass case in which it was enclosed. It was a beautiful scarabaeus and at that time unknown to naturalists of course. A great prize in a scientific point of view. There were two round black spots near one extremity of the back and a long one near the other. The scales were exceedingly hard and glossy with all the appearance of burnished gold. The weight of the insect was very remarkable and taking all things into consideration I could hardly blame Jupiter for his opinion respecting it.
The example nicely illustrates the weakness of this class of ciphers, as even I could solve this one in a few minutes :-) Much more fun than crosswords, why don't they publish these in the papers instead? (Oh, and I was expecting the message to switch to "PWNED BY XXX <censored extreme vulgarity> HAHAHAHAHAHA" in the middle, but sadly, it didn't) 82.103.198.180 20:41, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoiler

message: Weird that this title is on cryptography. I would have expected this sort of stuff at frequency of letters but it is odd that this page also discusses this. I was expecting discussion of the frequency spectrum here. BigNate37(T) 15:14, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This comment was made back when the page was at frequency analysis; that's now a disambig and this is frequency analysis (cryptanalysis). BigNate37(T) 04:33, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cryptography? 

message: :If this is not accepted, then I suggest Frequency analysis (disambiguation) → Frequency analysis. Aspie rational (talk) 09:54, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: If the cryptogram is:
 Lyqi qi pe xexixph zpdpmdpzy. Ql httvi it tdkqepdc pek ftjjte. Ctx stxhk lyqev lypl etlyqem qi sdtem sqly ql, pek, qe apfl, etlyqem qi. Wxl ql qi xexixph. Fpe ctx aqek ql? Bxil p nxqfv lyqev iytxhk kt ql. Ql qi etl lpoqem. Ctx iytxhk aqek txl sqlytxl pec yqeli. Phh lypl ctx jxil vets lt atdj ctxd ithxlqte qi dqmyl qe adtel ta ctx. Q vets qa ctx stdv pl ql p wql, ql sqhh kpse te ctx. Ql'i it pjpuqem pek it twgqtxi lytxmy ctx fpe ilqhh jqii ql.
How to solve it? 滄海77 (talk) 18:27, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A problem 

message: For the sentence: 
"Several schemes were invented by cryptographers to defeat this weakness in simple substitution encryptions."
There was no mention for any weakness of simple substitution encryption before this sentence. 
--MartyMcFly88 (talk) 16:48, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing some context