lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:River Wensum

message: Please correct me if I'm wrong .But Thorpe St Andrew is on the Yare.Northmetpit 12:01, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The rivers join somewhere on the border between thorpe and thorpe st andrewGraemeLeggett 13:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The rivers join just south of the Station Yards near the old Gas terminus, Thorpe St. Andrew is actually on the Yare, the new cut is the truly navigable bit that flows parallel to the railway line. So Thorpe is on the Wensum, Thorpe St. Andrew is on the old Yare Course. You could of course argue that seeing as The Wensum is the larger river, and the Yare is the tributary, that is is the Wensum all the way to the coast, but where does that leave Yarmouth? - all at sea... wonder why it works that way round - odd.Typejunky 19:35, 01 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thorpe St Andrew 

message: Is it on the WensumNorthmetpit 10:05, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great Witchingham 

message: Hi. After taking a look at the Bridges of York article. I was thinking of a similiar page for Norwich with links from the Wensum and Norwich articles. Your thoughts please. (Northmetpit (talk) 08:51, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I would suggest expanding the existing section in the Wensum article and adding refs, pics etc as a prelude to creating a new article. Regards Motmit (talk) 11:26, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bridges of Norwich 

message: I have always understood the source of the Wensum to be the spring at Wensum Farm in West Rudham.  
The range of documents I have checked from 1795 to 1940 all go along with this (including the OS 1st Edition which clearly identifies the spring in question).  I can't find any reference for the source being in either Whissonsett or Colkirk.
Anyone wish to dispute this before I update the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thousandthman (talk • contribs) 19:20, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Thousandthman (talk Just checked one of my maps the source you quote appears to be a spring that feeds the River Tat close to the village of Coxford . Northmetpit (talk) 11:32, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 
Talk:Christmas creep

message: I hate how these WikiProjects take up space in the Discussion tab... I click on the tab thinking there's discussion about Christmas Creep and there's not. -Rolypolyman (talk) 02:36, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject

message: Given how the phenomenon has extended beyond Christmas to include earlier marketing of all seasonally-themed merchandise, I move that we create an article titled "Seasonal retail creep" for Wikipedia, and that this article be incorporated into the new one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karlbonner1982 (talk • contribs) 01:49, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That probably does need its own article. Christmas creep should somehow include the fact that the celebratory elements of Christmas - decorative lights, trimming Christmas trees, and the commercial aspects of placing Christmas displays in shop windows, have also been subject to creep. As a boy in the 1960s and 1970s, I clearly recall not seeing lights or displays for Christmas any earlier than about two weeks prior to the 25th. This information might be hard to corroborate, or even research, beyond oral histories however. PJtP (talk) 22:41, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's create a "seasonal retail creep" article
Talk:Fernvale, Queensland

message: Its important to find out when the town was officially established (often first surveyed) and for this to be added to the infobox next to the |est field. Shiftchange (talk) 05:16, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of establishment

message: This article is largely uncited and has been so for many years it seems. There comes a point when the only option is to delete material without citations. Your thoughts (or better still, your citations) please. Kerry (talk) 23:54, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited content, time to start deleting it?
Talk:Newberry, South Carolina

message: OK.  Meeples doesn't want to admit it, but the Super Wal*Mart seriously is the economic hub of Newberry.  Does anyone else who actually lives here want to discuss this and maybe try to find a source to appease the admins? - 65.5.217.91
My relatives have deep roots in Newberry, South Carolina, and I visit every year. The Super Wal*Mart, is, in all factuality, the economic hub of Newberry, but I'm not certain as to whether or not that information belongs on the page. If it does, it deserves more writing.67.9.107.231 20:25, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wal-Mart
Template talk:ORBCOTW former

message: Hello, this template presents a set of problems due to the usage of Template:Click, which is being deprecated (see Wikipedia:WikiProject Usability/Clickable images). Although the top icon is very cool, I don't know any other way to create a clickable "user" top icon without using this template or similar CSS hacks. "Standard" top icons, like the Featured Article star, are going to be fixed editing the Monobook style sheet, but I'm afraid that "user" top icons like this should be replaced by a banner, for example. I recommend to make a banner similar to User:Nesher/ORBCOTW for former colaborations of the week, and put them in the talk page. If you wish, I can do the all the changes myself. Best regards, --surueña 10:15, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Template:Click
Talk:Desert Land

message: Mine copy of Desert Land is exactly 60:00 long. Also is it ok to include that Trapped In This Age has hidden track after silence ? Desowin 22:31, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey I added the info, thanks for pointing it out, I got the track times of the internet.--E tac 12:00, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Little differencies
Talk:Svenska Scoutförbundet

message: Merge Vässarö. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  17:55, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose: One of the major Scout campsites in Europe. Vässarö's importance is comparable to Gilwell Park, KISC or Wiltz International Scout Centre. --jergen (talk) 18:10, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm willing to hold on this, but the article sure does not show this. I'm familiar with the others (been to KISC several times), but never heard of Vässarö. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  18:51, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Gave it two years. Merged. --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 09:47, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vässarö
Talk:Michael Gremio

message: Why does it say he's compared to Bruce Dickinson? He sounds nothing like Bruce Dickinson. His voice is basically an exact clone of Michael Kiske's, but he sounds a million times better than Bruce.
:Yeah well the last part of your sentence has no significance to this, but I do agree he sounds nothing like Dickinson. More like Geoff Tate. But, correct or not, a lot of people do compare him to Dickinson for whatever reason (ignorance and laziness, says I). Radagast1983 00:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Compared to Bruce Dickinson?
Talk:Life Without Soul

message: Here's a puzzler...
OK, so, most plot summaries are overly long, too detailed, and full of information that ends up being quirky interpretations by the specific person writing them that are not necessarily accurate. For a long time I've said the plot summaries should be cites to reliable sources. But some people who care more about having them than following encyclopedic standards ignore the original research aspect and got a consensus of people to decide that editors watching or reading a work of fiction can then be allowed to summarize the work. 
But this article was worse. This is a lost film. No editor here could have seen it to write a summary. So where did the info come from? Clearly it had to come from outside source. We don't know if that source meets WP:RS standards. And since the information has to come from some very limited sources (who could have even seen it?), not mentioning what source was used would make the section plagiarism at best. 
There was no justification fo keeping any of the content of this section, so I removed it completely. If someone wants to re-add anything about the plot, please find sources that meet the rules outlind in WP:RS and cite them appropriately. DreamGuy (talk) 00:26, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed the plot summary section
Talk:The War of the Worlds (film)

message: Wikipedia already has The War of the Worlds (disambiguation) article, which has all of these links. -- Alpha PrimeTalk||Edits 18:33, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. We sorted all the WotW disambiguation out at the same time as it was a giant mess. There was a real problem with the films and this fixes it. It is also worth noting this page is not a disambiguation page but a set index designed to address the specific problems of the films and it worked. (Emperor (talk) 20:49, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needed? 
Talk:Condemnation of Romanian communism regime by Traian Băsescu

message: the title is simply wrong. the "condemnation" is non binding, thus not "official". even if base thinks he's a player, he can't impose it. It needs parliament approval. So i think "Condemnation of Rocomreg by Traian Basescu" is the right title. Anonimu 11:32, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sadly, no. If you read the transcript, you'll find Mr. Băsescu saying: "...o singură menţiune. Vă rog să-mi permiteţi o singură menţiune. Discursul meu de astăzi, ţinut în faţa Parlamentului, se constituie, în baza prevederilor constituţionale, drept act oficial al statului român." Biruitorul 07:31, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The only real official (binding) acts of the president are, according to art 100 of the Constitution, the decrees, and those only in certain domains. And this statement is definitely not a decree. Any declaration of a romanian MP during the parlamentary session is an "act oficial al statului român". I think that if we read all the transcripts on senat.ro or Cdep.ro we'll find a lot of interesting "official statements".. I wait for articles about Vadim's and Funar's "official" statements. Anonimu 13:00, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So, should he be sued for abuse of power? Biruitorul 20:12, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I think you're thinking of article 88. -- gcbirzantalk 03:35, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I'm sorry, but this article is a mess, and a content fork of Presidential Commission for the Study of the Communist Dictatorship in Romania. Instead of doing copyedit and translation here, I motion to simply merge all that is relevant to the Commission article. Dahn 01:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree: merge any useful content from here with the other article. Biruitorul 01:26, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll second that. Turgidson 04:24, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to merge
Talk:Donna Windsor

message: Hmm. Is there any news that tell that this character will return to the series (I personally haven't heard about it anywhere else) or are changes made by an IP user  vandalism? ,,n (talk) 10:52, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Return

message: Donna Windsor-Dingle is going to leave Emmerdale in 2009.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.115.82.247 (talk) 17:39, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Departure 
Talk:Victoria Sugden

message: Rated as a stub as the article is quite poor and requires a lot of cleanup --Amxitsa 15:41, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating

message: I've begun a discussion regarding the atrocious state of character articles within the Emmerdale universe. These articles stand to be deleted unless corrective action is taken. Please join the conversation at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Emmerdale#Serious problems across the board; let's start with character articles. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Emmerdale]] character articles; invitation to discussion
Talk:Betty Eagleton

message: I've begun a discussion regarding the atrocious state of character articles within the Emmerdale universe. These articles stand to be deleted unless corrective action is taken. Please join the conversation at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Emmerdale#Serious problems across the board; let's start with character articles. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:02, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Emmerdale]] character articles; invitation to discussion 

message: Before her exit she hadn't appeared for like a year. Do we note this in the duration or article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.18.212.147 (talk) 19:18, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Duration
Talk:Sam Dingle

message: *Rain the 1 BAM 04:13, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: I've begun a discussion regarding the atrocious state of character articles within the Emmerdale universe. These articles stand to be deleted unless corrective action is taken. Please join the conversation at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Emmerdale#Serious problems across the board; let's start with character articles. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Emmerdale]] character articles; invitation to discussion 

message: I remember him being axed in the early noughties and then a later producer deciding to bring him back. That should be noted in his duration.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.0.101.57 (talk) 20:22, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Axed in early 2000s
Talk:Lisa Dingle

message: I've begun a discussion regarding the atrocious state of character articles within the Emmerdale universe. These articles stand to be deleted unless corrective action is taken. Please join the conversation at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Emmerdale#Serious problems across the board; let's start with character articles. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Emmerdale]] character articles; invitation to discussion
Talk:Marlon Dingle

message: I've begun a discussion regarding the atrocious state of character articles within the Emmerdale universe. These articles stand to be deleted unless corrective action is taken. Please join the conversation at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Emmerdale#Serious problems across the board; let's start with character articles. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Emmerdale]] character articles; invitation to discussion 
Talk:Paddy Kirk

message: I've begun a discussion regarding the atrocious state of character articles within the Emmerdale universe. These articles stand to be deleted unless corrective action is taken. Please join the conversation at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Emmerdale#Serious problems across the board; let's start with character articles. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Emmerdale]] character articles; invitation to discussion 

message: Is his middle name Frederick or Cedric?  In the July 1, 2009 episode, at his 40th birthday, Chas calls him Patrick Cedric Kirk.  Exploding Boy (talk) 22:55, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Diane Sugden

message: I've begun a discussion regarding the atrocious state of character articles within the Emmerdale universe. These articles stand to be deleted unless corrective action is taken. Please join the conversation at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Emmerdale#Serious problems across the board; let's start with character articles. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Emmerdale]] character articles; invitation to discussion
Talk:Shadrach Dingle

message: Several editors have been adding date of birth information, with the suggestion that it is the DOB of actor Andy Devine. This information belongs on Andy Devine (English actor), not here. If the date of birth of Shadrach can be found, that is permissible for this page - provided that it's verifiable. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:05, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 

message: On Instagram a good Page named @qoutes.of_.life is sharing good post and continuesly sharing for entertaining and motivating person.
Www.instagram.com/qoutes.of._life 
Origin :- 2019 
Owner :- Govind Quotes.of. life (talk) 16:46, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  @qoutes.of._life
Talk:Rodney Blackstock

message: I've begun a discussion regarding the atrocious state of character articles within the Emmerdale universe. These articles stand to be deleted unless corrective action is taken. Please join the conversation at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Emmerdale#Serious problems across the board; let's start with character articles. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Emmerdale]] character articles; invitation to discussion 

message: Sorry if I'm being a bit stupid.
What does 2000– mean? Justanot (talk) 18:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, only just seen this! "2000–" meant that he has appeared in the soap continuously from 2000 onwards. However, that was incorrect formatting and has since been changed to "2000–present" to comply with MOS:DATETOPRES. – DarkGlow • 20:37, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think they meant the "2000–" in the storyline section, which wasn't really needed there, as he's appeared in every year since his intro. - JuneGloom07 Talk 22:43, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning? 

message: The storyline section was removed earlier by an IP user claiming that it breached policy – the section was certainly long but I agree with  that the section didn't exactly breach policy. I conversed with  after I saw the removal and he plans on condensing and rewriting the section, and I thought it relevant to mention that here before there's a content dispute with another removal of the section. – DarkGlow • 20:40, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey - yes I will condense it. I do not want to remove information - I just will make the sentences shorter :) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 20:46, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm condensing and copy-editing it right now. Compared to some plot sections, it wasn't actually that bad. - JuneGloom07 Talk 22:22, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

text:  Done. There was definitely some content that needed trimming. - JuneGloom07 Talk 22:46, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Storyline section
Talk:Gabby Thomas (Emmerdale)

message: I have placed merger tags on a number of character articles. Rather than repeat the reasoning on each talk page I have set out the full argument here. Please feel free to leave comments either on this talk page or at the WikiProject. I want to try and start a debate about the whole way in which Emmerdale information is provided on Wikipedia --Amxitsa 18:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merger
Talk:Post's inversion formula

message: * Criticism made by user 'KittySaturn' (author of the article??) is a bit impartial, nowadays we have powefull computers to achieve the first 10,100 or even 10000 derivatives of a function (using tables) in an affordable amount of time or using Numerical methods,making the fomrula tractable... or simply you can use the Grunwald-Letnikov differintegral with n- integer and small step h to calculate the derivatives of arbitrary order using a computer.--85.85.100.144 11:58, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Chas Dingle

message: I've begun a discussion regarding the atrocious state of character articles within the Emmerdale universe. These articles stand to be deleted unless corrective action is taken. Please join the conversation at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Emmerdale#Serious problems across the board; let's start with character articles. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Why do we need articles for individual characters in soaps anyway? This article reads like a fan page, or something from a teenage magazine. There are no references at all. It's right that the actors appearing in soaps should have articles, but the characters? They're not real folks! --146.90.143.90 (talk) 00:16, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Emmerdale]] character articles; invitation to discussion 

message: In October 2022 Chaz (Lucy) will have been in Emmerdale for 20 years. Currently 19 years. Update needed on longest serving Emmerdale cast members.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Percy2345 (talk • contribs) 04:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  update Chaz (Lucy Pargeter)
Talk:Debbie Dingle

message: I've begun a discussion regarding the atrocious state of character articles within the Emmerdale universe. These articles stand to be deleted unless corrective action is taken. Please join the conversation at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Emmerdale#Serious problems across the board; let's start with character articles. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Emmerdale]] character articles; invitation to discussion 

message: * - Scott and DebbieRaintheOne BAM 16:40, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Pearl Ladderbanks

message: I've begun a discussion regarding the atrocious state of character articles within the Emmerdale universe. These articles stand to be deleted unless corrective action is taken. Please join the conversation at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Emmerdale#Serious problems across the board; let's start with character articles. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Emmerdale]] character articles; invitation to discussion 

message: An editor is asking that Meg Johnson's death be included on the article. I reverted the change as currently, it has nothing to do with the character. If they decide to kill her off-screen as a result of her death or something similar, then it could be added with sourcing. But as of right now, this bears no relevance to Pearl. – Meena • 13:44, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Johnson's death
Talk:List of NME covers

message: This article is excessively long. I've broken the earlier section into a new page to manage the length, as the newer issues will naturally continue to grow. TheClashFan (talk) 00:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. MegX (talk) 00:24, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Excessively long list

message: Should the article be put into a table? Categories being issue number, date, artist and additional infomation? This would take sometime to complete, however I feel it would be worth the effort.(86.160.198.158 (talk) 20:03, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It would double the length of the existing page, making it slow and unworkable. TheClashFan (talk) 01:54, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What To Do? 

message: I just corrected some of the 2007 and all of the 2008 dates. All of them were wrong. If somebody could correct the rest of the 2007 dates and maybe earlier? I will be also be putting every new issue in the day it comes. --Flashflash; 21:43, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: The AfD linked at the top of this page, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of NME covers, ending in no consensus was compromised by sock puppetry. The user who made the nomination, User:Artyline, was determined to be a likely sock puppet of one of the commenters in the AfD, User:Cradleofrock. In turn, these were likely sock puppets of a banned user evading his ban. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 03:29, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sock puppetry 

message: Why do we have mid-week dates listed rather than the date on each issue (Saturday)? Very confusing. --Michig (talk) 19:09, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates
Talk:Jimmy King (Emmerdale)

message: This article is far too informal for Wikipedia. It needs a lot of editing to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rocksrule77 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I've begun a discussion regarding the atrocious state of character articles within the Emmerdale universe. These articles stand to be deleted unless corrective action is taken. Please join the conversation at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Emmerdale#Serious problems across the board; let's start with character articles. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Emmerdale]] character articles; invitation to discussion