lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Compound of great icosahedron and great stellated dodecahedron

message: This article was marked for deletion while I was expanding it. I believe I have fleshed out a stub sufficiently. I created this page to include more information than what can be given in the table at List of Wenninger polyhedron models. At some point I'd like to expand further into showing the theory of construction for stellations, and for now am starting with a few most interesting examples like this. Tom Ruen 06:24, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article creation 

message: How is the convex hull supposed to be a rhombic triacontahedron? The vertices of the gI are completely within the dodecahedral hull of the gsD. So I would say the convex hull is a dodecahedron. (And the "convex core" is the icosahedron seen from the center of the gI.) In any case I think the hull and core that matter are the great rhombic triacontahedron and the great icosidodecahedron. See dual compound (current version). Greetings, Watchduck (quack) 02:06, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hull
Talk:Dryness (taste)

message: Shouldn't there be a disambiguation page for this? I'm pretty sure dryness can (and mostly does) refer to amount of liquid water in a mixture/substance. Usually given as a measurement by dryness fraction or dryness factor.
I'm new to editing wikipedia though, so i'm hesitant to actually add it to the page labled a drinks stub, can someone who is more familiar with the normal process do whatever it is that needs to be done? Aurea Mediocritas 06:25, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I'll move dryness to alcohol sense and dryness to dry. Mikael Häggström (talk) 19:41, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title/location

message: It should be amended that dryness is pertaining to "only alcoholic beverages." Gus is a soda company that touts a line of grown up sodas that are less sweet than their counterparts, that are packaged under the guise of "dry" sodas.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.233.222.253 (talk) 16:14, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  alcoholic beverages 

message: The article Martini (cocktail) says "The dryness of a martini, referring to the ratio of gin to vermouth." This article says "Contrary to popular belief, in a dry martini "dry" refers to the type of vermouth used, sweet or dry, not the amount of vermouth used in the drink." Which is it? 50.191.22.227 (talk) 02:29, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction between this article and [[Martini (cocktail)]]
Talk:Masjid Al-Abrar

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Singapore's 100 Historic Places. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 06:35, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Sultan Mosque

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Singapore's 100 Historic Places. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 06:22, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Former Supreme Court, Singapore

message: Sources belong here, not in external links or references, unless they are used as inline references
It's true! So many well-intended sources appear to be dumped in the External links sections as if it's a parking lot for them. Perhaps some editors are unfamiliar with the process; please leave me a note on my talk page and I'll be glad to discuss it. In addition, the use of galleries in articles are generally frowned upon. Images are meant to reflect and enhance the information in the text, so I have removed the galleries per WP:IG. Please do not take this personally. Let us work to expand the text and reference it! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 21:59, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources belong here, not in external links or references, unless they are used as inline references- and photo gallery issues
Talk:Ted Ginn Sr.

message: is this really a relevant article? 153.104.80.121 06:30, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why don't we merge this article to the Teddy Ginn Jr. Page? Or make this a redirect, this article has zero relevance. 71.99.87.242 13:05, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: ginn is a excellent role model for not just young MEN but for women to he was my coach in 1996 and a great father figure for me as well as the other girls on my team i  am 27 now and my love appreciation and respect for him will Never leave (shonie)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.8.83.147 (talk) 04:37, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I love u ginn 

message: Many may not know that Ginn started coaching with the Pal-5 teams and went on to the Dixon Raiders, pee-wee team. 
Thanks Ginn
KB  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.243.207.163 (talk) 08:28, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coach
Talk:Raffles Hotel

message: Some of the text of this page is a very blatant copy of text from the book referred to, even including the use of "this book":
In 1987/88, while researching the history of the hotel for this book THE RAFFLES TREASURY
I do not have any knowledge of the topic, and I don't know the contents of the book referred to, so I defer actual editing to others.
--Gar37bic (talk) 21:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The place was either the only or the best luxury hotel for a long time. It was a favorite for expat colonials. During a run-down period it was also an expat-backpacker favorite. It is a wonderful old colonial building. The current food and service is great, but very expensive. However it has an extra special niche for having been a favorite of the rich and powerful in bygone times. 
I have some familiarity with the place. I went there out of curiosity when I first worked in Singapore and went there for my first wedding anniversary. Both are long ago.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.77.60.29 (talk) 05:56, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is famous for being famous 

message: While this English version states two brothers as the founders of the hotel, articles in other languages name four of them: Martin, Tigran, Aviet, and Arshak Sarkies. Which version is correct?  84.153.197.71 (talk) 06:37, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Four or two brothers?
Talk:Swissôtel The Stamford

message: User 'Flame 1611' is obviously an employee of this hotel or the hotel group. He has re-written this whole article and now it looks like an advertisement. --Shorty23sin (talk) 09:09, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hotel Employee 

message: Who is the architect, really? Solar Apex (talk) 21:37, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Architect 
Talk:Pantysgawn

message: Is this a hoax? Fishal 21:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A Google search says "apparently not." Alekjds talk 03:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hoax
Talk:Damenlou Hotel

message: I have removed the second lead paragraph which was a lightly edited lift from here. Bridgeplayer 22:38, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And I have removed the material which was copied directly from . As you can see there is not much left. --Russavia 22:53, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible copyvio
Talk:Shangri-La Hotel Singapore

message: The Shangri-La Hotel chain usually have titles incorporating a comma, after the location and word hotel. I propose for consistency, that this article's title include the comma. Activist (talk) 09:27, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposing changing title 
Talk:The Fullerton Hotel Singapore

message: The text of this page is in violation of copyright laws.  It has been directly copied from pages 74-75 of the book Singapore's 100 Historic Places which is copyrighted by Archipelago Press. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reaperducer (talk • contribs) 23:05, 27 July 2007
:Resolved - page deleted and restubbed by User:Garion96 on 3 Sep 07. See also  --Rifleman 82 02:45, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: will be re-working on it. —Sengkang 02:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Violation 

message: Can I request the help of an administrator to move this article to its proper name "The Fullerton Hotel Singapore"?  Thanks. —Sengkang 00:57, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for page move

message: --Editor-1 (talk) 07:26, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons:Featured picture candidate
Category talk:Cancelled Linux games

message: Does this include cancelled Linux ports of released Windows games? -- Darklock 06:49, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

message: this should be called "Cancelled GNU/Linux games" 2600:1700:BA02:36E0:1BA8:9419:C8AC:3719 (talk) 01:27, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  GNU/Linux
Talk:Izaak Kolthoff

message: I am removing the reqphoto tag as an appropriate photo has been uploaded for the article. --Anthony5429 21:18, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reqphoto 

message: I've completed major revisions to the page, which include breaking the biography into separate sections for early life and education, career, and personal life and activism. In doing so, I have consolidated sections on publications, areas of research, and honors and awards. Much of the previous information had been plagerized (largely from Johannes F. Coetzee's 1999 biographical memoir published by the National Academy of Sciences), and major portions used section headers that unnecessarily divided content. I have attempted to resolve those problems and add sources and wikilinks to improve the article. KLindblom (talk) 22:02, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major revisions
Talk:Hermann Park

message: Parking it here until I can eventually make a small subsection for it: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/life/hoffman/7484934.html
--Hourick (talk) 16:33, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hermann Park RR ref 

message: I've created :Category:Hermann Park and :Template:Hermann Park. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:36, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category and navbox 

message: *https://houston.culturemap.com/news/city-life/04-04-22-hermann-park-the-commons-park-rocket-ship-gardens-pavilions-ducks-ponds-bird-conservancy/
---Another Believer (Talk) 21:52, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of best-selling computer and video games

message: Note: The user Dionyseus has been arguing that it is unacceptable for the article to be unsourced because it is over a year old, implying that it "should have had a source by now". However, this is twisting the facts. It may have existed for over a year, but it only just became unsourced recently (and ever-so conveniently, Dionyseus has only chosen to blank the page when VGCharts' data was removed). - A Link to the Past (talk) 02:37, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Brooklyn Eagle

message: The Brooklyn Eagle was housed in the "Eagle Warehouse and Storage Co." warehouse at 28 Old Fulton St, Brooklyn, which still stands today, but was converted to residential condos in the 1970s.  Directly across the street from the front entrance is a Grimaldi's Pizzeria.  thumb|250px
: Can anyone confirm that the newspaper was published from a warehouse.
::The newspaper offices were at 28 Johnson Avenue, not the Eagle Warehouse. The Warehouse at 28 Old Fulton Street was where the paper's printing presses were, not the editorial offices. K72ndst (talk) 20:03, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved off page

message: The article Hollow Nickel Case indicates that the message was not a welcome message, as indicated in this section.  Tckma (talk) 21:33, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hollow Nickel Case 

message: How much of this article should be about the original defunct paper and how much about the successor that uses the same name? Should I link a new BE article to this page in a citation template or not? – Muboshgu (talk) 16:27, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is currently about both papers, so I see no reason why you shouldn't link to it. Gatoclass (talk) 02:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay. It's a bit odd with the infobox start and end dates which refer only to the initial paper though. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:55, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about the scope of this article
Talk:Kanako Higuchi

message: Wikipedia articles should have reliable secondary sources as references. Valrith 05:34, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Before you go marking up every Japanese article you can get your hands on with these reference remarks, you must understand one thing: 95-percent of the Japan-related articles on the English Wikipedia is translated from the Japanese Wikipedia. This particular article states just that, and you didn't even see it. Reading your comments on other Japan-related articles, you have no clue about Japanese culture. So please stay out of them and stick to auditing the Japan articles. Groink 08:09, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if it was translated from jp.wikipedia, then it should still be carrying the references that were used in the creation of that article. Valrith 21:17, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Emotional competence

message: IMHO, this article appears to be a combination of Original Research and pop psychology references and not an article to be included in the database of Psychology as a social science or profession. Sincerely, Mattisse 17:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree totally. It sounds like pseudoscience and gives no context to the subject. (Where does this idea come from and who asserts it? Is there criticism? What field does it go under?) BlankAxolotl 04:49, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: US Military believes in it. I have reworked the Lede and Cite'd it as such. I will try digging further into the subject and see if we can improove the rest of the Article. Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 09:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that these are problems. From the sources provided in the article, it appears the US Military believes it is synonymous with emotional intelligence. That other article does not have these other issues. Perhaps these should be merged?ParticipantObserver (talk) 20:28, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with article
Talk:Presidential Decision Directive 25

message: Just started the article, too tired to finish it tonight... I'll get back to it tomorrow. I would like to expand this further and ensure NPOV by talking about the benefits of PPD-25; its also hard for me to do that because I spent a whole year debating why PDD-25 was the worst thing ever created, but I will try my best. I am also going to see if there are other significant executive orders that need articles made. It would be cool to make a whole new section of articles dedicated to the topic. The762x51 07:41, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creation 

message: In Vince Flynn's novel, Deception Point, he states the following:  'Presidential Decision Directive 25 (PDD 25) grants Delta Forces “freedom from all legal accountability,” including exception from the 1876 Posse Comitatus Act - a statute imposing criminal penalties for anyone using the military for personal gain, domestic law enforcement, or unsanctioned covert operations.'
There is no support that this text comes from PDD 25, although his exact wording has spread throughout the internet as if it were "gospel truth".  Given the limited but conflicting information available about PDD 25, Flynn's text is most likely an author's invention.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oleh77 (talk • contribs) 10:16, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use in Fiction Novel "Deception Point"
File talk:Hopkinsbox.jpg

message: The dvd cases of Hopkins FBI I got have no covers, this looks like the cover of the manual. -- Darklock 07:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, as it shows on this page: http://www.sslug.dk/julekalender/2004/12.php3 . I didn't realize that. I'll change the description to reflect that. Also, did you say you got yours on DVD? If so, where from? RightClickSaveAs 19:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
File talk:Kids in pajamas.jpg

message: Yeah, real cute - Now how about we crop and shrink it, so it's not so huge and infringing upon Hitatchi's branding.  Seriously people, learn to crop and resize your junk.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.243.180.163 (talk) 18:17, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What a couple of ugly kids  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.243.180.163 (talk) 22:18, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Georgia Tech Cable Network

message: HD Channels have been removed from GTCN listings due to technical difficulties. This occurred in Fall 2007. Centrisian (talk) 03:48, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Schleich

message: At the moment, there's an external link leading to a store that keeps being added back in by a user with the same name as the store. Links that lead to other stores keep getting removed by aformentioned user. I'm not entirely sure whether or not these links are appropriate.
As far as I can see, the links are to an online store but seem pretty inoccuous.  I looked at some of them and the Schleich homesite.  The Schleich homesite is actually a little hard to navigate and they don't sell direct to the public.  
I don't mind this.
Sorry, first post was me. Forgot to sign it. That being said, a warning was tagged to ClassicToysNYC's talk page, saying "Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. Seems to me that's all these links are. Saberclaw 02:15, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The links to online stores selling these items fail our WP:external links guidelines and are not appropriate for an encyclopedia.  They should not be re-added.  -- Siobhan Hansa 21:53, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

text: You forgot to read the WP:External links guideline. Links to discussion forums should be avoided. --Iohannes Animosus (talk) 00:31, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: Discuss the sources issue here.  EvergreenFir (talk) 06:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources and edit war 

message: I bought the country house and stable for my granddaughter but Mr Kramer doesn’t have any hair. I realise that he should have hair as the illustration on the box shows him with hair. Can I get the hair and connect it.
My granddaughter loves the set and plays with it regularly. Thankyou Julie Newey 
julienewey@hotmail.com 2A02:C7F:E408:C100:9D8C:4E7C:E93:4FD7 (talk) 20:29, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You should contact the company directly about this. We are writing an encyclopedia about Schleich and millions of other subjects, we have no connection to or influence on the company though, we are not their official website. Fram (talk) 12:58, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr Kramers hair
Talk:Visitor (disambiguation)

message: I think it would be best if we merged the two disambiguation pages of The Visitor and Visitor (disambiguation) together. --Elonka 08:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: *https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Doctor_(1952_TV_series)
*When it went into syndication, it was re-titled The Visitor.
71.80.203.159 (talk) 16:42, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Needed addition
Talk:Kurdistan Airlines

message: Most of the information on this page is not sourced can we get some sources, and plus the link to the official Airline webpage doesn’t work or maybe the page is offline.  --D.Kurdistani 08:22, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Evelyn Rudie

message: * Article needs references --Mdukas (talk) 15:34, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 
Talk:Welshpool railway station

message: Something ought to be mentioned about what the station buildings shown on the picture in the infobox are being used as, when I visited Welshpool about 20 yrs ago they were apparently converted into shops of various kinds. If the picture were not here and the reader had only the text to go by they might be given the impression the buildings have been demolished.Cloptonson (talk) 17:28, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the surviving buildings?
Talk:Machynlleth railway station

message: According to the map at Corris Railway the line goes on to Morben, but the text and the box at the end indicates that the Corris Railway terminates here. Would someone like to comment! Ender's Shadow Snr (talk) 15:41, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The horse-worked tramway went that far. Once the mainline railway arrived at Machynlleth though, there was little point in the new steam-hauled Corris going any further, especially as there was some trouble with the river channel moving and disrupting the old tramway quay. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:13, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corris railway going through to Morben 

message: I know the footbridge was replaced in 2016 but I am unable to find a reliable news source on its opening. Unfortunately the station facilities section on the Network Rail website is outdated and shows the previous bridge. Another example of how the website is outdated is on the facilities for Cosford railway station in which the map shows the old station before it was rebuilt between October 2011 and April 2012. I used the link to the Flickr image as I am having difficulty in finding a free image of the present bridge.Tk420 (talk) 13:47, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footbridge