lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Irish Travellers

message: , Red & Black Revolution has none of the hallmarks of a reliable source, i.e., known for reporting statements of fact, usually with an editorial policy or professional pedigree. It's a movement periodical to be interpreted by academics and journalists, not something an encyclopedia should be citing directly. For more information on what makes a source reliable, see WP:RS, but please revert your revert. czar 00:34, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi . Not really seeing what the issue is, here. It is (was) a periodical that's not listed at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources and is being used for a non-controversial fact. Biased sources may be reliable in a specific context, and there is nothing to indicate that it's incorrect or biased in this regard? BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 10:02, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's no different than a blog. It has little to do with bias and more to do with having no claim to editorial discretion and therefore no claim to reliability. It doesn't matter that the fact is right or wrong but whether the publication is trustworthy for the fact. And if noteworthy, there should not be an issue finding a suitable secondary source replacement. czar 02:06, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red & Black Revolution 

message: Declan Henry's article headed Traveller Community 'Belongs to Ireland' in The Irish Post (published in Birmingham) of 1st October 2022 has different population statistics: around 40,000 Irish Travellers living in the Republic of Ireland, approximately 5,000 in Northern Ireland, an estimated 15,000 - 20,000 in England, Scotland and Wales, around 20,000 in the United States and "a sizeable community" in Canada. No sources were given for the data, but they may be in his book "Gypsies, Roma and Travellers: A Contemporary Analysis" published by Critical Publishing on 7th September 2022. ISBN 978 191508004 2 NRPanikker (talk) 21:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative Facts 

message: I'm working on the article Fletcher Street Urban Riding Club, which is about an American organization that teaches young people about taking care of and riding horses. The article includes some material about horse-riding teenagers in Dublin, but it doesn't seem to belong in the article -- it's not closely related -- so I'd like to move it. I'm thinking this could be rewritten to fit under "Sports" in this article, since the practice seems to come from Irish Traveller traditions. Does that make sense? Suggestions for other places to cover this? Dreamyshade (talk) 17:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Figuring out where to put material on "Pony Kids"
Talk:Cystoscopy

message: I have performed about 6000 flexible cystoscopies. While some patients have post-procedural dysuria, most are fine. Thus I have made the changes to reflect this.  Jfbcubed 09:45, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-cystoscopy pain 

message: Re-wrote and separated the post procedural care instructions from the section describing the procedure, also clarified the prescribing of antibiotic and anti-infective agents and urinary analgesics. PA MD0351XXE (talk) 01:08, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Post Procedure Info

message: Someone should try to edit the lead so that it flows better. I'll do it if I get the chance. I'm a medical writer, I would prefer that an MD do it..Scott Adler 18:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening is clumsy

message: I was looking up cystoscopy; but wasn't sure what had been said, so first went to cystectomy.  I realised this was not what was suggested; but there was no link to cystoscopy; so I would like to suggest that here (and probably in a lot of medical pages), that links are made to related words to ensure that it is easy to check what word we were really looking for.  There is a world of difference between these two proceedures and luckily I realised my doctor had not meant the -ectomy! ScientistOld (talk) 12:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - please see Template:Distinguish, you can do this yourself. CV9933 (talk) 13:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related words
Talk:Halifax (disambiguation)

message: * Maybe it's just my Canadian bias showing, but Halifax, Nova Scotia has four times the population of the Halifax in England, and is the most important city in the region. In addition, a large number of links in the "What links here" page are for the Nova Scotia city. I therefore propose we move Halifax to Halifax, England and make Halifax redirect to Halifax, Nova Scotia. Kirjtc2 4 July 2005 22:32 (UTC)
** Look over twice as many articles on wiki that are linking to Halifax, NS link to HALIFAX.  It is BAD WIKI to move Halifax WL to the redirect page.  We have a link on Halifax NS to Halifax WL.  I will go and fix ALL THOSE OTHER LINKS (about a dozen) to go to your page.  Please stop changing this.
** <B>Links to Halifax that are about Halifax, NS</B>
** Fredericton, New Brunswick
** Moncton, New Brunswick
** New Brunswick
** Nova Scotia
** Neptune (disambiguation)
** Twin cities
** Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Canada
** Space Shuttle program
** CTV television network
** List of music festivals
** Warped Tour
** Greater Moncton International Airport
** Biodiesel
** Hakodate, Hokkaido
** Peter MacKay
** American Eagle Airlines
** List of beaches
** Toronto-Dominion Bank
** Waverley
** Tatamagouche, Nova Scotia
** Canadian slang
** Denny Doherty
** P-61 Black Widow
** List of Montreal bridges
** .ca
** Royal Bank of Canada
** United States-Canada border
** USS Rhode Island (1861)
** <B>To Halifax, WL.</B>
** Robin Hood
** Reform Act 1832
** Talk:British monarchy
** Hebden Bridge
** HMS Good Hope (1901)
** Thomas Gage
** History of rail transport in Great Britain
** Alexander Cambridge, 1st Earl of Athlone
** User:Morwen/County boroughs
** The Duke of Wellington's Regiment
** HMS Ramillies (07)
** USS Gilbert Islands (CVE-107)
** George Grant
** Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway
** BBC Radio Leeds
** List of places inspiring definitions in The Meaning of Liff
** Paradise Lost (band)
** John Lions
** WayeMason 21 August 2005 15:10 (UTC)
*** Personally I have no problem with Halifax being the page for Halifax, West Yorkshire, since this is the originally named town.  I'd redirect Halifax, West Yorkshire to Halifax and use the Halifax (disambiguation) page for linking to all other articles containing the word Halifax.Plasma east 20:56, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Halifax, Nova Scotia vs. Halifax, West Yorkshire
Talk:Shithead (card game)

message: I just found out that the word "to count" in Russian (which is effectively how the game Shithead is played) is pronounced "Shchitat" .... could this be a coincidence? I think there maybe something interesting in the game's origins maybe from Russia? Maybe it is not originally from Finland .... Just a thought.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.145.189.13 (talk) 18:51, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worth Mentioning?

message: I have seen a rule common in the UK whereby if 3 of the same value (not suit) are put down together, possibly by three different players! then if another player should have the 4th card no matter where they are in the order of play, then if they are quick enough they can slam it down, clear the deck and possibly win the game OR its their go next. I think a clearer version of this rule should be added perhaps. --I love football 1982 22:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rules

message: Grammatical correction. On the first line of the article it states that the game is known as "shed". This should be "sh'ed", as in an abbreviation of "shit head". This word is still pronounced "shed".
Hozat (talk) 10:04, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: - the source cited in the article (David Parlett's Penguin Encyclopedia of Card Games) calls it "Shed". We'd need an equal or stronger source confirming any alternate spelling. --McGeddon (talk) 10:55, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 July 2014 

message: ===Shithead computer games===
* Poohead is a Shithead app for the iPhone and iPad. It can be played in single player mode against the computer or in multi player mode allowing players to play Shithead against other players around the world. The single player mode allows wildcards to be configured to a players variant of the game.
Gje306 (talk) 21:38, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: per WP:ELNO #5 ("Individual web pages that primarily exist to sell products or services").--McGeddon (talk) 21:45, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 July 2014 

message: * Poohead is a Shithead app for the iPhone and iPad. It can be played in single player mode against the computer or in multi player mode allowing players to play Shithead against other players around the world. The single player mode allows wildcards to be configured to a players variant of the game.
Gje306 (talk) 21:38, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: per WP:ELNO #5 ("Individual web pages that primarily exist to sell products or services").--McGeddon (talk) 21:45, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Shithead computer games

message: As the title states, there seems to be significant similarities (among many the name). 62.202.189.191 (talk) 16:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No. 199.120.30.205 (talk) 03:37, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Skitgubbe]]?
Talk:Poverty

message: hey im not a normal user i just browse but i couldnt find a way to report the tooltop for the page on poverty. screenshot attached https://i.imgur.com/FyoJbjX.png 69.201.139.236 (talk) 21:19, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tooltip needs to be edited 

message: — Assignment last updated by Hachaudhari (talk) 19:39, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Community Economic and Social Development II
Talk:Acetone

message: Section "Uses" -> "Laboratory" -> "Chromatography"
This subsection does not contain anything related to acetone at all. I suggest to remove this section. 213.232.244.41 (talk) 08:21, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Thank you for pointing it out. I removed it. –MadeOfAtoms (talk) 07:16, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subsection "Chromatography"
Talk:Freedom Press

message: As well as the pic of Freedom Press it would be nice to see some photos of the stainless steel Clifford Harper murals that are on the wall of Freedom bookshop as you come down Angel Alley quercus robur 17:41, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Clifford Harper murals

message: The article should be broken up into phases, under relevant topics around a chronological theme. In addition, all its books published/re-published should be listed. --Sentryward (talk) 22:15, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extending / improving the article
Talk:Ben Stiller

message: Please add “According to newspaper magazines, Stiller and Christine Taylor may have appeared to reconcile their separation on September 22nd at the 2019 71st Primetime where the couple attended and was seen being affectionate together. Ben Stiller was nominated for directing HBO’s limited series, “Escape at Dannemora," which was nominated for a total of 5 Emmys for his first TV series. https://www.aol.com/article/entertainment/2019/09/23/are-ben-stiller-and-christine-taylor-back-together-2-years-after-separation/23817978/https://people.com/tv/ben-stiller-christine-taylor-attend-2019-emmys-together/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guerillakitty (talk • contribs) 18:35, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Wikipedia is not a gossip magazine. Sceptre (talk) 01:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 November 2019 

message: ciao  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.32.75.152 (talk) 14:54, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ciao 

message: The term “voice actor” needs to be removed from his occupation section, because it’s a subset of acting and the term “Actor” already covers both his live action and voice over work. Plus, he isn’t notable for being a full time voice actor. 97.33.64.187 (talk) 21:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done ― Qwerfjkl | 𝕋𝔸𝕃𝕂  (please use  on reply) 17:16, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 2 June 2021 

message: I want to change the image to a recent image. 49.207.195.132 (talk) 09:48, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: - which image are you proposing to use, and what is its copyright status? - Arjayay (talk) 09:51, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 March 2022 

message: Change “Spouse: Christine Taylor (m. 2000-2017)” to “Spouse: Christine Taylor (m. 2000)”
They announced their reunion in Feb 2022. They never officially divorced and are living together as a married couple again.
 https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2022/02/24/ben-stiller-christine-taylor-reunite-relationship-after-separation/6921668001/  71.73.35.194 (talk) 17:46, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Already done Our article's infobox already shows this, guessing you're referring to the "infobox"-like thing google pulls up which we do not control  Cannolis (talk) 18:51, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 May 2022 

message: While not on the indisputably defining list of applicable categories, googling "Ben Stiller drummer" does provide a relatively wide array of reliable sources discussing his experience as a drummer, so I think this should be up for consideration at least. 181.115.61.81 (talk) 06:49, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music related categories?
Talk:Jennifer Saunders

message: In my effort to merge the now-deleted list from the article Gay icon to the Gay icons category, I have added this page to the category. I engaged in this effort as a "human script", adding everyone from the list to the category, bypassing the fact-checking stage. That is what I am relying on you to do. Please check the article Gay icon and make a judgment as to whether this person or group fits the category. By distributing this task from the regular editors of one article to the regular editors of several articles, I believe that the task of fact-checking this information can be expedited. Thank you very much. Philwelch 22:12, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gay Icon Project
Talk:Polyploidy

message: Could the article explain why certain cells in the body exhibit polyploidy? Does it confer some kind of advantage - more DNA, more metabolism or greater fault tolerance?94.118.36.72 (talk) 11:37, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explain why, please 

message: Isn't the very first sentence in the article a bit misleading? "more than two paired sets of chromosomes" could be understood as "n paired chromosomes, where n > 2". In other words, it sounds like it refers to an even number of chromosomes larger than 4, when really what you mean is: "more than two sets of chromosomes" or "more than a pair per chromosome" or "three or more copies per chromosome". I'm not sure what's the best way to phrase this - I'm leaving that decision to the native English speakers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.174.53.84 (talk) 13:44, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading phrasing 

message: This page is not inviting! There is too much information on one page. I reorganized to have terms collected and examples in clades. But, I think more work needs to be done. 
Suggestions: 
* Make additional pages for Autopolyploidy and Allopolyploidy
** Keep the definitions simple here and make these pages have extended thoughts.
* Decrease the first section - 
** It needs to be comprehendible and an easy read.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShellyG1 (talk • contribs) 19:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much info on an unorganized page 

message: — Assignment last updated by Pgress (talk) 20:49, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: BISC 2 Genetics, Ecology, and Evolution
Talk:WIL WHEATON dot NET

message: Is there a reason the page title is in all caps?
That is the actual capitalization of the titlebar seen when you visit the blog. B7T 11:46, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitals? 

message: Someone has proposed merging this article with the larger Wil Wheaton article. I would agree. The site's sole reason for existence is Wil Wheaton, and the blog is, in turn, responsible for much of his current fame now that he has become predominantly a writer who occasionally does work as an actor. (A merger would also make the use of the ALL CAPS less of an issue, given that as an article title it almost seems as if people are being fans — even though it is the way the title appears on the blog — whereas having a section heading be written that way won't seem quite so out of place.) Lawikitejana (talk) 20:13, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger?
Talk:Pyrénées-Atlantiques

message: -----
Wondering how to edit this département entry? The Wikipedia:WikiProject French departements standards might help.
------
Where is it? Population, anything else of interest? Vicki Rosenzweig
Anyone willing to fix departement stubs may want to visit Wikipedia:WikiProject French departements for more information. Also:
Population: document in French: 1999 census, including population of regions, departements and cities of more 100,000 inhabitants. Caution: "Aires urbaines de plus de 50,000 habitants" doesn't give the population of the cities, but the population of the "urban area", the city and its surroundings. 1999 French census
For more information: the "Conseil General" of the departements (their governing body) have harmonized the URLs of their websites. For instance, the URL of the Puy-de-Dome Conseil General is: http://www.cg63.fr (note that 63 is the departement number). - User:Olivier
Many images are available here for the villages and town of this department, 61% of articles are illustrated today in french Wikipedia, approximately 35% in January, it's 16% moreover !France64160 (talk) 14:20, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

message: Hi there, I see you keep insisting in deleting the information I added, I understand you have good grounds to believe that is not so, but since you specify nothing I don´t know. Iñaki LL (talk) 14:19, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The informations you've added are unsourced and misleading. The creation of the Pyrénées atlantiques didn't result in the "fusion of the Basques and the Bearneses", they had no mutual hostility, Lower Navarre and Bearn were united before the creation of the departement... I'm afraid nothing can be saved from your edit...  Blaue Max (talk) 19:02, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, I'm afraid you are still treading water. Nothing is sourced in this article, but you chose to remove the information I added, I expect you to have reasons for it. Evidently they were not at war, but it's no secret that at that time, and later, despite their expectable trade and neighbourhood relations, the Basques and the Bearnese didn´t get along. The Labourd, and Soule lost all the specific institutions and laws they still retained, and Basse-Navarre lost all the different local prerogatives it had under the Parliament of Navarre in Pau. An outcry of the Basque representatives in the assemblies (Ustaritz) ensued on the wake of the French Revolution, and Dominique Joseph Garat designed a halfhearted specific institution for the Basques. Irrespective of their local institutions, Basques identified and understood with each other, and the foreigners, including the Bearnese, are/were called Kaskoinak, literally "Gascons" but meaning 'aliens', frequently pejorative, if you happen to know a bit of Basque from that area. Evidently, institutions and former boundaries were removed, and new administrative ones imposed. I add this and this for your information, check also the Nafarroa Beherea and Lapurdi entries, it will be enlightening for you, err, if you happen to read Spanish. Iñaki LL (talk) 20:46, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverted edits in history
Talk:Warg

message: If it's agreed that wargs are Tolkien's creation, then there is certainly room for Jackson's adaptation of wargs lower down the article, and indeed of Martin's and other people's, but none of their visualisations should take pride of place in the infobox. I've therefore moved the Jackson image back down beside the Jackson text, where it belongs. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:57, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tolkien, Jackson 

message: , I am doing spotchecks for some GAs I promoted without spotchecking, and some issues came up:
* FN 13 cites "Peter Jackson's film adaptations of Tolkien's The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings extend the role of wargs as mounts for Orcs, battling the horse-riders of Rohan. The wargs in the three Hobbit movies are more wolf-like while eastern wargs that appear in The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers have hyena-like appearances." Some of this isn't in the source but is in the movie, so I think it might be best to cite the movie -- this isn't a plot section which typically doesn't need a cite.  (The same applies to the other use of this source, in the image caption.)  The main concern, though, is that the second sentence is not covered by the source.
** Yes, they're more fan-description than analysis. Removed. 
**:Struck.  I still think you should add cites to the movie but that's a minor point. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 14:53, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  There you go. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:28, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: All looks good; thanks. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 14:57, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spotchecks
Talk:Support vector machine

message: It looks like the legend in the "training example" graphic in the Kernel Trick Section was reproduced from the corresponding graphic in the "Kernel Trick" WIKI page, but something was left out. The legend in the latter is longer and correct, while the legend on this page is shorter and wrong. I do not know how to fix it and it is pretty minor... but it is irritating... HHHEB3 (talk) 18:47, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graph incorrectly reproduced?
Talk:Great Schism

message: I am offended that on this page Wikipedia blandly repeats a common fallacy as if it were fact.
The Great Schism was between Avignon and Rome, and occurred in the 14th century.
The East-West Schism (sometimes called the Great East-West Schism), happened in 1054 between the Roman and Byzantine churches.
Only the ignorant ever refer to the East-West Schism as the Great Schism.
I myself am too much of a Wikipedia newbie to know how to handle this situation, so I did not change the main page, other than to add a Fact template after the reference.
In many ways, I think a search for Great Schism should lead somewhere that would set people straight who think the Great Schism is the East-West Schism.  And maybe this page is it.
But the page should certainly not repeat (and propagate) the widespread but completely mistaken notion that the two are synonymous!
--Prignillius 15:50, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are entitled to your opinion, but the fact is that more people who use the phrase "The Great Schism" use it to mean the 1054 split, not the internal squabble within Catholicism. --Orange Mike  | Talk 14:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Great Schism is NOT the East-West Schism of 1054!