Talk:Peter and the Starcatchers

message: :Image:Peter Starcatchers.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Peter Starcatchers.gif

message: Just because Tinkerbell prefers to be called a bird-girl or whatever in a certain scene does not mean she is exempt from fairy status. I think that section should be changed. Also, the reference of her preference seems a little misconstrued, to me. 76.27.43.136 (talk) 03:14, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tinkerbell's fairy status 

message: If you read the plot summary of this book, you will notice that most of the adjectives are subjective and that the text reads more like a review. Unfortunately, I have not read the book. My only knowledge of it is from reviews and from friends that have read it. And, when I search the internet for a real synopsis, again I only find very subjective synopses. I found something slightly less subjective at http://koolteecha.edublogs.org/files/2010/01/PATS-Plot-Summer-Characters.pdf. However, even this needs cleaning up. I implore any individual who has read the text to write a better summary, please!
68.251.32.74 (talk) 04:21, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The completely biased and unqualified plot summary 

message: I never see any where in the book where his last name was moustache. Justaguy120 (talk) 03:06, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stache's name? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Peter and the Starcatchers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080731234159/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/119891.html to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/119891.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:43, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Currently, the lead information for this article includes references to the novel's sequels and The Never Land Books/Never Land Adventures. Although these references link out to other Wikipedia articles, they are not mentioned later on in the main body of the Peter and the Starcatchers article. To fix this, I propose adding a section titled "Sequels and Other Works" that will reference and provide more information on the other novels that are set in the same literary universe. --Moira388 (talk) 17:25, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information In Lead Section Not Present In Article