Talk:Sinicization

message: I don't know much about the subject, but should "Mons" be changed to "Hmong"?  "Mons" currently links to a Belgian city.  Easytoremember 12:05, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mons

message: The paragraph regarding the expulsion of Vietnam from the Han dynasty really doesn't belong here.
Intranetusa (talk) 18:53, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted various parts

message: quite sure japan influence in modern east asian practices is higher.
i always thought Sinicization of east asia occur prior to the european arrival.
i cannot really agree with the statement without seeing the usage in an article. 
agree? Akinkhoo (talk) 11:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A modern meaning is the process by which other peoples like the Koreans, Japanese, and the Vietnamese are strongly influenced by Chinese culture and working practices?? 

message: because that is what both sides on the dispute in Taiwan call the position. Roadrunner (talk) 16:15, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change to unification 

message: I think we can continue the neutrality discussion from Talk:Republic_of_China#.22sinicize.22 here.--pyl (talk) 16:42, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taiwan 

message: When adding information from a new source, it is not ok to simply remove or misstate information from sources that already exist. Readin (talk) 19:47, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding information from a new source 

message: A paragraph in the article Chinese nationalism reads
:"After the 1911 Revolution, the official definition of "Chinese" was expanded to include non-Han ethnicities as part of a comprehensive Chinese nation (Zhonghua Minzu), although some historians argue that this was due mainly to the realization that a narrow definition of "Chinese" would result in a loss of Chinese territory, and that the Manchus were too sinicized to be considered an outside group."
But this article says nothing about the sinicization of the Manchus! Instead, there are contemporary and contentious allegations of the sinicization of Tibet and Taiwan! Covering what linked articles refer readers to would be a good start for making this article useful and neutral. The Homosexualist (talk) 03:31, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manchus 

message: Purblio (talk) 23:50, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sinicization of yunnan 

message: I tagged the article for "need for expert" because the coverage is haphazard and not comprehensive. The definition in the lede is "non-Han Chinese societies come under the influence of dominant Han Chinese state and society," which seems to be political, but the general usage is more cultural. The following examples are confusing. To take only a few examples, the section "Integration" is a good idea, but does not address the current or historical policies of the PRC. The section on the Ming is two sentences on military expansion, not on sinicization, and the Qing section leads by saying that the Manchus "began to sinicize," and gives the example of taking Chinese names. There is much more to be said on this fascinating topic! ch (talk) 18:01, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that this article does need attentions from experts. The section on the Ming is indeed more about military expansion than sinicization, and thus requires major rewrites (and I have added a cleanup template to this section). The section on the Qing has major problems too, although I have tried to change the first paragraph of this section a bit in order to mention there exist different views on this issue. --Evecurid (talk) 19:24, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for balance and up to date coverage 

message: In this article, someone added a cleanup tag for the word "Chinalization", which you added to this article's lead section several years ago. Is "chinalization" a commonly used word, or is it a neologism? Jarble (talk) 00:19, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: English is not my major language, but I has read this word, by example this one and this. china and chinese are obvious words, because they have many different definition. --Alfredo ougaowen (talk) 02:46, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to be uncommon common Chinglish. The actual English term would be Chinafication or Chinification, but it's not terribly common either. — LlywelynII 06:58, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Chinalization" 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sinicization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090712112116/http://www.tibet.com/HumanRights/poptrans.html to http://www.tibet.com/Humanrights/poptrans.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:55, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified