Talk:000 (emergency telephone number)

message: Please clarify what acronyms mean when using them for the first time.  "due to lengthy delays at the SECC level, being ESTA"--180.150.114.140 (talk) 16:30, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Acronyms

message: I think it should be added that the non-emergency number for police (except in Victoria) is 131 444  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.91.9.190 (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Police Assistance Line

message: This information is based on an internal policy memo, which I can't cite.  I've included the best external references I can find, but some better ones would be appreciated! Monobeg 00:28, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Triple zero"

message: I grew up in Brisbane, Queensland in the 1960s and 70s and recall the number as being 999 (like the UK) then changing to 000, I think that happened about the same time as the introduction of Subscriber Trunk Dialing. I'm trying to find cites.  Alexlaw65 (talk) 08:33, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 999

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
** In 000 Emergency on 2011-05-20 22:35:24, HTTP Error: BadStatusLine
** In 000 Emergency on 2011-05-31 15:19:39, HTTP Error: BadStatusLine
--JeffGBot (talk) 15:19, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead link

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC_100580
** In 000 Emergency on 2011-05-20 22:35:24, HTTP Error: BadStatusLine
** In 000 Emergency on 2011-05-31 15:19:45, HTTP Error: BadStatusLine
--JeffGBot (talk) 15:20, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead link 2

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,253828775013404,00.html
** In 000 Emergency on 2011-05-20 22:34:23, 404 Not Found
** In 000 Emergency on 2011-05-31 15:19:58, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 15:20, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead link 3

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.acma.gov.au/emergencycalls
** In 000 Emergency on 2011-05-20 22:35:24, HTTP Error: BadStatusLine
** In 000 Emergency on 2011-05-31 15:20:19, HTTP Error: BadStatusLine
--JeffGBot (talk) 15:20, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead link 4

message: In addition to the other problems listed here, I distinctly remember reading a news article in the 90s saying that 000 had a problem not faced by other emergency numbers because of the use of "0" as a prefix for dialing out of internal business phone systems followed by dialing an international number with a "00" prefix, together making  "000". Obviously not a problem when actually inside a business phone system, but the problem was business people pressing 0 as an automatic habit once at home (and then internationally from home). My guess is this article was in a major Sydney newspaper circa 1995 or 1996, could be of interest to this article, and possibly still a problem for the number? 121.44.96.34 (talk) 01:17, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Acidental dialing from dialing out internationational calls

message: I was wondering whether they mean $400000 USD or $400000 AUD.  Please make it more obvious.  
UpsandDowns1234 (talk) 06:45, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's AU$ SPARKZY 16:34, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Why on Earth would anyone confuse an article solely about an Australian subject and think that financial statement would be in US dollars?  78.32.143.113 (talk) 14:05, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: US$ or AU$

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. DrStrauss talk 18:55, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: 000 (emergency telephone number) →  – Unnecessary disambiguator Pppery 19:02, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
I missed this discussion, but 000 is a bad page title. Too many things could be all zeros. Legacypac (talk) 19:24, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move 22 June 2017

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Triple zero which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 01:05, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: Rj sohag sk 103.131.145.213 (talk) 12:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  01778462542