lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chaetomorpha

message: This partial sentence makes no sense:
it was shown that coal bed methane is filtered by chaetomoropha, and is made for livable for Daphnia magna
I do not have enough technical expertise on this subject to clarify what it is saying, though, and am hoping someone can clarify the sentence and explain what it means, as well s citing a source.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cvcdrk (talk • contribs) 02:44, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Preko

message: What kind of article about Preko is this?
Famous Stipanov dinasty? Please do it again,
and it it wright. And I`m not sure about fact
87% of Croats. I think that`s more then 87%.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.15.177.85 (talk) 22:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ??
Talk:Regions of Senegal

message: According to Statoids, as of September 10, 2008, there are now 14 regions: "Kaffrine region split from Kaolack (former HASC code SN.KL). Kédougou region split from Tambacounda (SN.TC). Sédhiou region split from Kolda (SN.KD)". bd2412 T 15:06, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New regions

message: The figure given for the population of Kolda Region (714,392 in 2013) differs greatly from the value given on the page for Kolda Region(633,652 in 2013).
Looking at the http://www.statoids.com/usn.html page, it gives 662,455. This is between the 2 Wiki figures but closer to the lower one.
Does anybody have access to a valid source to check this out and get a better set of figures?  There are smaller discrepancies on several other Regions as well. (Are the figures on the individual pages really 2013?)MWchat (talk) 10:49, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population discrepancy for Kolda
Talk:Hampsthwaite

message: Hampsthwaite is the correct spelling : Hampthswaite is not and contains also inaccuracies regarding Hampsthwaite Feast
Suggest that Hampthswaite is removed and the reference to Hampsthwaite Feast is corrected to :
In 1304, Edward the 1st (ie 'Longshanks' or 'Hammer of the Scots') granted the Market Charter of Hampsthwaite to hold an annual market and fair on the Feast of St Thomas the Martyr - Hampsthwaite being one of the few churches in the UK to be named after St. Thomas a' Becket.
See : Hampsthwaite Village Web Site
The Trivia attached to Hampthswaite should be transferred to the new Hampsthwaite Feast 1304 (talk) 10:41, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Hampsthwaite with Hampthswaite
Talk:St. Joseph's Convent, St. Joseph

message: I loved being a student of the school and enjoyed every moment of it, especially with my friends. But over the past couple of years the institution has failed to uphold the high standards of the "long time days". I do wish the best to this school and hope that the TEACHERS in particular, will make a conscious effort to improve the school's standards and bring it back to what it used to be; A school with young, decent and intelligent women. I have moved on to somewhere i enjoy a lot, for its environs as well as its excellent educational system. But i do still care about SJCSJ!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.93.115.145 (talk) 23:52, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Talk:1935 Boston Braves season

message: I just wanted to mention that some of the details about Babe Ruth were from the Atlanta Braves page. Maple Leaf 21:01, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Babe Ruth details
Talk:Collinsiella

message: The reversion I just made reverted the article back to its state by established user Willow W, removing unneeded and unverified bot edits. --69.226.103.13 (talk) 20:20, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion 
Talk:School of Business and Computer Science

message: I would like to update the article on the [of Business and Computer Science], however whenever I make an edit the Bot reverts to the original version. What am I required to do in order for the edit to be published?
Looking forward to your reply.
131.100.36.72 (talk) 19:32, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it's because you're linking to Facebook as a source. Facebook isn't a reliable source for content on Wikipedia. Guettarda (talk) 19:56, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Template talk:Perth Sports Teams

message: As per the original 
Bongomanrae 21:02, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Instructions

message: Should they be included?  The rest of the Jim Beam Cup teams are not listed in the corresponding Sydney template. -- Chuq (talk) 23:31, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Jim Beam Cup is not listed as a professional league. Should be de-listed. May as well include VFL sides. --Falcadore (talk) 08:26, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The JBC is semi-pro. It has a salary cap and also a points system to determine how players are paid. However as it is a third tier rugby league comp I'm not sure if it'd be suitable for this template. Bongomanrae (talk) 03:09, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Western Reds
Template talk:Melbourne Sports Teams

message: As per the original 
Bongomanrae 21:02, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Instructions

message: and the Melbourne based V8 Supercar teams are where? Australia's third most attended sport behind AFL and Horse Racing, roughly equal to Rugby League and head of Cricket... think it deserves a spot. --Falcadore 03:22, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought I had addressed this on the other template? If you want to add motorsport then go ahead, no-one is stopping you. Bongomanrae 11:04, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Motorsport
Talk:Film Archive Forum

message: "It has particular interest in the preservation of nitrate film, acetate film, videotape and digital media; the training of archivists, acquisitions policy, standards for archives, copyright, co-operation with film laboratories, and contacts with foreign archives."
This is simply not true.  I was a member for this group from June 2001 to November 2006, during which time its work was almost exclusively focused on political lobbying to secure increased public funding for the English regional film archives.  During this time it undertook no initiatives (which I can remember) related to the specific technical practices of preservation, copyright, co-operation with labs and contacts with foreign archives.  Indeed, I was regularly criticised, sometimes quite heavily, by members of FAF's executive for suggesting that it did become involved in these areas.  For example, when, towards the end of my time on FAF, I pointed out that there was only one lab in the UK which is capable of carrying out high quality colour photochemical duplication work on problematic archival elements and that the absence of such a lab in the public sector jeopardised the UK's preservation infrastructure, the chairman told me in no uncertain terms that it was not FAF's place to 'interfere' with the provision of commercial services.  During my time at FAF, it did not undertake a single collaborative project with an archive outside the UK that I can recall (indeed, there is no logical reason for it to do so - there are already international representative bodies for film archives and archivists, e.g. AMIA, FIAF and SEPAVAA, with well-established work in this area).
I therefore suggest that this sentence be replaced with:
"The principal function of FAF is to provide publicity, advocacy and political lobbying on behalf of the public sector moving image archives in the United Kingdom, with the main aim of securing a level of public funding for the sector which safeguards its core activities and long-term sustainability." --LDGE 21:13, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Janet Dulin Jones

message: This article needs help with:
*Sources
*Tone of the article, a little too promotional
Note that her profile on IMDB is self-written. Realkyhick 21:19, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This looks better now, probably as good as it will get given the subject. Shall we release the patient now? - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:45, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd be happier if we could fill in more of those cite requests, but I looked for a while and came up with nothing. So I think this is good enough. --Bfigura (talk) 06:46, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Discharging. I've removed her from the ICU page, and added to the archive. --Bfigura (talk) 06:49, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Release now?
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Betacommand 2

message: Betacommand's edit stats using "wannabe Kate" tool as of 21:20, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

message: I don't get this.. I think the bot is irrelevant, either on the support or the oppose side.  Am I missing something?  Friday (talk) 21:40, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am inclined to agree, but I suppose if a user had been careless with a bot, it could signal a potential lack of care with admin tools. The relevance in this case is debateable but hardly a critical issue, in my opinion. GDonato (talk) 21:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, he was desysopped because he ran his bot on his admin account, and, if he constantly makes mistakes with the bot, well... That's why people (including myself) are opposing on that basis, along wth the trust thing GDonate mentioned above. --Boricuæddie 22:00, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He was, really?  Re-reading Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Betacommand, bot usage was only one of the concerns.  Myself, I am far more concerned about his history of inappropriate blocks, history of poor judgment, and unsatisfactory communication.  The bot is small potatoes.  Friday (talk) 22:10, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

text: There are occasional mistakes with the bot, I agree, and they are fixed, but from what I've seen, a lot of complaints about the bot have been from users who don't understand the image policy very well. Acalamari 22:08, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are people talking about the bot?
Talk:Hudson River Historic District

message: Is linked to a place in Scotland, I would've dabbed the link, but couldn't be sure what it should point to. Otherwise, an amazing job on this article! Murderbike (talk) 02:23, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[The Meadows]]... 
Talk:Tamakasuga Ryōji

message: He's up to announce his retirement. His official page has been changed recently . --Bilderling (talk) 13:23, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks -- article now updated. Interesting (to me, anyway) that he announced his retirement immediately after winning on Day 14, so he didn't even have a match scheduled for day 15. I guess he decided to pack it in once it was clear he couldn't get an immediate return to the top division, and he chose to go out with a win. --Pawnkingthree (talk) 20:05, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retirement 
Talk:Terry Langford

message: :An article created in 2007 about a subject executed in Montana for capital murder that only has general references. While in prison he killed another inmate. Statistically he was the: 
*9th murderer executed in U.S. in 1998
*441st murderer executed in U.S. since 1976
*1st murderer executed in Montana in 1998
*2nd murderer executed in Montana since 1976
:There is nothing notable about this person, meaning "worthy of notice" or "note" – that is, "remarkable" or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded" within Wikipedia as a written account of that person's life." -- Otr500 (talk) 09:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
File talk:Thistlegorm train parts minus red edit.jpg

message: But those are not train wheels..... Those appear to be winch parts.
--24.236.151.207 21:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Err, this is a ship, not a train. So yeah... (Why am I even replying to a comment made by an IP two years ago?)--Sooo Kawaii!!! ^__^ (talk) 21:55, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Abradatas

message: The article at Aryasb appears to be about this same person, married to the same woman. I see no reason that the articles should not be merged under this the more common name for him as used in English publications. --Bejnar (talk) 09:10, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from Aryasb 

message: This article needs expansion, especially since lots of info can easily be found on the internet. You'll find a lot of info if you look for an English version for the Cyropedia.
Explosm (talk) 17:10, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:EU Concours

message: An anonymous editor kept adding links to a commercial website.  I reverted twice and then noticed the root of the problem: this article had a "Ways to prepare" section which was just a listing of books and commercial websites and commercial training courses.  I tried pruning the section but finally realised that it actually didn't belong in Wikipedia at all.
Here's the version of this page before I reverted, pruned, and removed: .
There was probably useful info in that section, but Wikipedia isn't a shopping portal nor a buyers guide.  This sort of info can be put in blogs, personal websites, company websites or the companies could pay for advertising somewhere, but it doesn't belong in Wikipedia. Gronky (talk) 19:46, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed "Ways to improve" section
Talk:Mitch Malloy

message: There has been no independent confirmation that Mitch Malloy was ever in the band other than what he himself has said in some interview. This article appears to be poorly sourced. In addition,   Mitch Malloy does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability in the field of music; 
he has NOT been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable.
he has NOT had a charted hit on any national music chart.
he has NOT had a record certified gold or higher in at least one country.
he has NOT received non-trivial coverage in a reliable source of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country.
he has NOT released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable).
he has NOT become the most prominent representative of a notable style or of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability.
he has NOT won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury or Grammis award.
he has NOT won or placed in a major music competition.
he has NOT performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g. a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a compilation album, etc. (But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article.)
he has NOT been placed in rotation nationally by any major radio network.
he has NOT been the subject of a half hour or longer broadcast across a national radio or TV network.
Eatabullet (talk) 17:08, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article listed for deletion 
Talk:Micromonas

message: -	The genetics section is a great addition. More details on the genome structure or specific genes belonging to the Micromonas sp. could be included. Is there a genome map (that could be included as well)?
-	Are they mainly located in the Arctic? You mention "oceanic and coastal regions" but not a latitude range except the Arctic. In the introduction, it says that Micromonas are distributed both in warm and cold waters.
-	Is there a density or a certain growth rate associated with their blooms?
-	Great section on viral infection
-	Great use of the links to other Wikipedia pages
-	Is there a diagram available for their light-harvesting apparatus? Is there a certain wavelength at which they harvest light?
-	Maybe you could insert a few sentences about their importance in global systems or how they can adapt since they are mixotrophs?
-	Can link the types of viruses in your page to other wiki articles.
-	Great in-depth description of cellular mechanisms and the use of genetics.
-	Is there another source of image for the morphology of Micromonas other than a drawing? Microscope image?
-	A list of Micromonas species with links to other pages could be interesting.
Migdesmarais (talk) 03:32, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review EOSC 475 
Talk:PDF (disambiguation)/Pdfpdf's rant

message: :The first problem here is, (and believe me and assume good faith, I am trying very hard to be objective), JediLofty has NO knowledge of the subject matter (he has admitted this). He is arguing purely and solely from a Manual-of-Style POV; in so doing he is introducing errors of fact. He has categorised these errors-of-fact as "trivial", without having any knowledge that they are errors, or how significant these errors are - i.e. he has insufficient knowledge (and interest - also admitted by him) to firstly, know that they are errors, and secondly, know how significant these errors are. (He has also implied that he doesn't care that he's introducing errors, but that is another matter.)
:It seems that the ONLY thing he is concerned about (or interested in) is the MoS; he appears to have NO interest in the accuracy or quality of the information. It seems he doesn't care what's there, just as long as it looks pretty and is presented according to "the rules". Which, of course, are not rules - they are guidelines.
:He makes the comment: "I gave up on that argument (my argument about maintaining the manual of style fell on deaf ears)." No, it didn't fall on deaf ears. I answered EVERY point he raised at GREAT length. Just because I didn't give him the answers he wanted to hear doesn't mean his "argument" "fell on deaf ears". (And just to add some irony to this, I am in fact "legally" deaf, but that doesn't affect my ability to think, read and type!!)
:We have discussed this matter at absurd length; I have made numerous suggestions and concessions in the hope of achieving consensus, but none of them have been acceptable to JediLofty. Despite four requests by me for him to suggest a solution that would address both my concerns and his, the first 3 times he ignored the request, and the fourth time he simply chose to exit from the discussion by saying that the matter was trivial and not worth discussing.
:Some time after these discussions, he made another edit which introduced another error. Given the absurd length of the previous discussion, I couldn't be bothered to get involved. But now he has made a third edit. Given our lengthy discussion, and therefore his awareness (if not knowledge) of the issues, I can only assume vandalism; HE has NEVER made any attempt to achieve consensus. It appears he has his own POV, and has NO interest in considering the fact that any other POV might exist, let alone making any attempt to determine what an NPOV might be.
:I'm not altogether sure what consensus he's asking for. It seems to me that he's asking for people to ignore the real world and the facts, and simply make sure that WP follows the MoS. Given that I thought WP is supposed to be an Encyclopedia, I have assumed that it's supposed to be factual, accurate and reliable. Perhaps I'm wrong? Pdfpdf 16:27, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:18th Intelligence Squadron

message: Sentences such as "producing brilliant airmen", "driving innovation" and "strong mission partnerships" seem to be unjustified given a lack of sources. I'd edit it myself, but I have no experience so doing, so I'd rather flag it for someone else to deal with. Martian Genocide (talk) 01:34, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: , . By the way, do you think that your username might be perceived by your fellow editors as off-putting? Cullen328 (talk) 01:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro reads as a glowing advertisement
Talk:Polymer-based battery

message: I am planning a complete update of this article as part of a polymer class. 
Outline:
Electrochemistry 
1.Electrochemistry: In this section, I will detail the electrochemical reactions involved in polymer-based batteries. This section is included on most battery type Wikipedia pages and is important to establish an initial understanding of how these batteries work. 
2. Charge and discharge: This is another common section on battery Wikipedia pages, and in the section I will briefly elaborate on the charging and discharging processes, as well as the effect of temperature on these processes.
3.Performance: Batteries are only of importance if they can demonstrate good performance, so this section is very important to include. I plan to include the specific energy density, volumetric energy density, and specific power density of current polymer-based batteries, and perhaps a note about the performance trend of these batteries over time. 
4.Types of Active Materials: In this section, I will discuss characteristics, specific advantages, specific disadvantages and examples of the following types of active materials.
5.Conductive Additives: This is a section I am still considering adding but am not certain. Due to the low intrinsic conductivities of polymers, besides conjugated polymers, the preparation of composite electrodes consisting of a redox-active polymer active material and a conductive additive is a frequent approach to overcome this challenge. 
6.Advantages: In this section, I will discuss the advantages of polymer-based batteries, especially in the context of other more commercialized batteries. 
7.Challenges: In this section, I will discuss the disadvantages of polymer-based batteries, especially in the context of other more commercialized batteries. 
8.Safety: Safety is a crucial component of commercialized battery science and it is therefore appropriate for it to have its own section. 
--Ala127 (talk) 15:51, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Transformation 

message: What comes to my mind when I hear polymer battery is the 2005 ORB based on the polyradical of the modified PTMA, or "2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinoxy-4-yl methacrylate," technology from Wesada U/NEC.  It is my impression that Waseda has demonstrated a different strategy, or maybe merely different tactic, in 2007 based on "nitroxide radical groups," "a redox-active organic polymer film."  Maybe the ORB article and this should be merged until the technology sorts out and then the ones that warrent expanded articles can be created?  Mulp 22:13, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polymer Battery generic 

message: This isn't an encyclopedia article; it is a blurb for a financial magazine. In fact I'll bet it was lifted from just such a source.
:Removed section that was a WP:COPYPASTE from PhysOrg.com. BarkeepChat/$ 15:08, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article needs to be rewritten
Talk:Rose Daughter

message: — Assignment last updated by Gcampbel (talk) 13:12, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Intertextuality

message: Hello! I am working on this article as part of an assignment and I wanted to make anyone interested aware of what I intend to do and why and to solicit any comments or questions on the subject. I am a MA student in English at VCU and am in the Intertexuality class associated with the WikiEducation class of the same name. My main goals to update this article is to prune the plot summary closer to the guidelines that is on the meta page Wikipedia:Plot-only description of fictional works. I also intend to fill out the critical reception portion, critical comparisons of this work by McKinley and her other book on the same subject published first: Beauty: A Retelling of the Story of Beauty and the Beast , and if possible add a section on the author's thoughts or intentions with doing the same work twice if I can find reliable sources.  MAStudentBrown (talk) 20:02, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Working on the Page