Talk:Renovaré

message: There are no common accents in Latin. The word in question should correctly be spelled Renovare, without an accent. Actually it is just pronounced /rɛ.nɔ.va.rɛ/.
I think this should be settled.
:"Renovaré" is of course the spelling promoted by the organization itself (see www.renovare.org).  They don't claim it is Latin, but rather that it is "from the Latin".  I think it's fair to recognize the name as a promotional construct along the lines of "Mötley Crüe" — the accent mark serves a purpose other than to guide pronunciation. In any case, it's their name, we should follow the spelling they use.  Think Toys R Us or the Apple marketing campaign Think Different — it would be incorrect to convert these to "Toys Are Us" or "Think Differently" even as we recognize spelling and grammer inconsistencies. technopilgrim 02:23, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

message: There was a critical link that was removed because "they make subjective, biased judgements about organizations. They believe Renovare is theologcally (sic) dangerous."  Nearly all religious groups, movements, theological schools of thought, et al. have opposing views and their articles have links along those lines.  Furthermore, Wikipedia policy is to have a balance of external links .  Without it we have only one position.  I have reverted the removal of this link and also corrected the mistyped address for the video link.  71.92.157.186 (talk) 23:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical Link 

message: The article is really shaping up to be a good one.  It's come a long way from being a stub.  
However, I think we might want to consider a short, well-sourced, criticism section.  Renovare, like just about any religious groups and movements, has garnered criticism.  In the interest of neutrality, we should include this information.  If know one cares to contribute, I will put a short section together. 66.191.19.68 (talk) 16:32, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Criticism section, as is, is somewhat suspect.  A single cite from an organization that appears to be little more than a website isn't particularly helpful.  No objection to such a section, but this really should be improved or booted for now.--Surv1v4l1st ╠Talk║Contribs╣ 04:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality of article. 

message: This article is very outdated. I'm affiliated with Renovaré so I hesitate to edit the article itself. If Renovaré doesn't meet notability requirements perhaps this article can be deleted.  If it does meet them we are happy to provide updated info to whoever maintains this page. Find contact info at renovare.org. 
Broyrom (talk) 15:45, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I am going to say that I think if you are adding objective and sourceable information and have read up on WP:NPOV, you are fine to update the page a bit. The article is fine with regards to WP:N, and I'll keep an eye on it to help you with WP:NPOV. Willthehelpfuleditor (talk) 16:32, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article outdated 

message: If this article doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability requirements, then perhaps it should be deleted. Any thoughts? 
- INSERT VALID NAME- (talk) 17:03, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it meets notability.  However, it does need to updated, better sourced, and otherwise improved.--Surv1v4l1st ╠Talk║Contribs╣ 04:03, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion 

message: The rather exhaustive study Bible produced by the organize likely warrants some inclusion.  I'm not entirely sure where at this point though. Surv1v4l1st ╠Talk║Contribs╣ 04:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Study Bible