lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Just Between You and Me (Lou Gramm song)

message: Just Between You and Me (Foreigner)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.105.236.27 (talk) 18:50, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Above-the-line deduction

message: Might this article more accurately be titled "adjustments to income" or similar? My understanding is that "above-the-line" is a common but nontechnical term for the items. chrylis (talk) 00:05, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Edicts of government, such as judicial opinions, administrative rulings, legislative enactments, public ordinances, and similar official legal documents are not copyrightable for reasons of public policy. This applies to such works whether they are Federal, State, or local as well as to those of foreign governments. Id.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.93.4.49 (talk) 16:11, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: what is the meaning of "MAGI" and "IRA". 
be a competent communicator. 2600:100C:B01D:1182:0:54:37ED:2001 (talk) 14:55, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  abbrivations
Talk:Ningbo University

message: ---------
i will not add pinyin reading to Chinese symbols on this page 
because when i do i'm blamed in vandalizing the article
http://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Appendix:HSK_list_of_Mandarin_words/Beginning_Mandarin&action=history  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.233.129.146 (talk) 09:14, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Instant-runoff voting/Archive 5

message: No longer contested? MilesAgain (talk) 09:02, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary: explanation of why "instant runoff" in Intro

message: *Yes: MilesAgain, sock, unknown master.
*Yes: Tbouricius, COI editor: paid consultant to FairVote, legislative proponent of IRV.
*No: Abd known critic of IRV, no affiliation.
*Yes/No: meamemg, presumed neutral. Application of Yes/No to this issue not explicit, however explained that it "doesn't make a lot of sense," and "I question the need for that statement to be in the introduction."
* WTF - User:Tomruen, known unpaid advocate of common sense. This consensus question is incomprehensible to me. (i.e. 100% support single vote as vital fact worthy of introduction.) [Clearly 'Yes' per below. MilesAgain (talk) 08:59, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If STV is single vote, then IRV is single vote. If two round system and exhaustive ballot are single vote, then IRV is single vote. You can argue people may have LESS votes (if they fail to rank), but never more than one! Tom Ruen (talk) 05:57, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary: IRV is a "single vote" in Intro

message: Practical implications
"Under IRV, unlike some other voting methods, the record of votes cast in a particular area cannot be conveniently summarized..."
I would note that only the total of each possible ballot combination needs to be sent to the central location. This is explained using the example earlier in the page.
I would say something like this.
"Under IRV the record of votes cast in a particular area cannot be conveniently summarized into one simple total for transfer to a central location. Instead it is often necessary to either transport the actual ballot papers or data files that contain a total of each possible ballot combination to the central location to allow for the IRV tabulation. Using the total of each possible ballot combination is seen in the above example."
Bill Arden (talk) 21:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  The current language is easy to understand. Any replacement language should be as simple as possible so that the average reader can get it.  --Ask10questions (talk) 16:24, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Practical implications - Tally each possible ballot combination
Talk:Vogtland

message: Theory of Slavic settlers in vast areas of Central Europe had been developed and established by 19th century nationalists within Panslavistic movement and later on gained broad reception within "Marxist-Leninist scientific communnism". Potential benefit before and during Cold War had been to ideologically back the legitimacy of a Soviet invasion in central Europe. However, results of independent research to maintain this theory are poor. Scientific value of this Panslavistic theory is compromised. --188.99.107.214 (talk) 13:42, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slavic Settlers
Talk:The Phoenix Requiem

message: What day does this comic update?
--DarshaAssant (talk) 00:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It updates Mondays and Thursdays. I have added the schedule to the summary and included an infobox... Isron (talk) 23:12, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Update Schedule

message: Sarah Ellerton stated in the forums of the Phoenix Requiem's website, that the woman in the dream in fact was Jonas' wife. I added a link to her post as a reference.Isron (talk) 20:30, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jonas' wife 

message: I plan on substantially shortening the Plot and Character sections in the near future, any objections ahead of time? Kuro ♪ 05:37, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea, they could use it. I think Tobias, Moretty, the kids, the McArthurs, Davith, and all the creatures could be dropped entirely. Anyone disagree? Tualha (Talk) 23:46, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am totally in favor of that, I plan on doing some major editing as well once I finish reading through the archives.  The Creatures section totally needs to go, there is nothing notable in there; and the Minor Characters section should go (or, at the very least, be trimmed down to little more than a list).  Reception can be fleshed out a lot more, both by adding more sources and just by improving the quality of writing in that section in general.  Anyway, that's just the stuff I noticed at first glance, and I'll probably start working on that within the next couple days, but if you want to edit any of those sections feel free to jump in as well!  —Politizer( talk • contribs ) 04:57, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shorten? 

message: I just removed the ridiculously long and detailed plot section.  I'm not even going to bother pasting it into here to save it, because it's so long; it can be accessed through the history if anyone needs to recover anything from it.
The version I quickly threw together now is still quite a bit too long for how long the comic currently is.  If I remember to work on this later, I'll try to whittle it down some. —Politizer talk/contribs 01:44, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[The Phoenix Requiem#Plot|Plot]] section
Talk:Hangzhou Foreign Languages School

message: -----
i will not add pinyin reading to Chinese symbols on this page 
because when i do i'm blamed in vandalizing the article
http://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Appendix:HSK_list_of_Mandarin_words/Beginning_Mandarin&action=history  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.233.129.146 (talk) 09:21, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

message: The following image is the logo for the school: http://www.chinahw.net/web/img/ha.jpg
However, as I currently can only use an open proxy to edit wikipedia, I cannot upload it through the wm commons uploader, so may someone help me upload this image? Thank you. Aaron Liu (talk) 03:13, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add this image as logo 
Talk:Burst Radio

message: I was station manager of the radio station during its RSL in November 2000 and saved a number of pieces of press and publicity from that time. These include an example of the logo before the one currently pictured on the wikipedia entry, and a variety of other pieces, including the moment of coming on air in November 2000. Please feel free to use as much or as little of this material in the listing as appropriate, you can see it all here on Flickr:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ghostsigns/albums/7215762409494748882.47.226.223 (talk) 10:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Press & Publicity Scans 
Talk:Banya: The Explosive Delivery Man

message: Hi X27, I've worked on the article, you might like to take a look. It's all from the web so would appreciate it if you would check it over since you have read Vol 1 & 2.  Julia Rossi (talk) 05:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: Wow, that tag looks so heavy, thought it would just say "hang on" –– tagged because I found more to develop this article and feel that it's important as a contribution to the knowledge of Korean manhwa action comics in the style of Japanese manga and tells them apart. The article also expands the range of this genre besides also being published by a US comics company with an article on Wikipedia. It also gives an full example of a current and developing manwha providing a blue link in the list: List of manhwa. As the tag says, I submit to the outcome in any case.  Thanks,  Julia Rossi (talk) 05:15, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for hang on tag 

message: Suggestion: it needs a section describing the Torren?  Julia Rossi (talk) 23:28, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, thanks for your work about Jihan -- a question, are the "men" actual enemies or the Torren themselves?  Julia Rossi (talk) 04:39, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: the Torren

message: Please expand the volume list with english chapter names, because I haven't the american version, only the hungarian version. Thanks! --Horsee (talk) 09:12, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I did it! :) --Horsee (talk) 20:20, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chapter names 

message: Reduced image and everything was line-free on the desktop but the uploading shows these distracting lines. Don't know what happened. Julia Rossi (talk) 07:04, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The lines are probably happening b/c the image is being shrunk down from original size to fit in the infobox (max width 250px).  Out of curiosity, why are you using a screenshot of a cover?  If you do that I think you have to give all the info about the software used to make the screenshot in addition to the fair use rationale and copyright tag. --hamu♥hamu (TALK) 07:09, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Julia, I went in and replaced the image with a shrunk-down, non-screenshot version of the same picture.  Its small size/low resolution justifies fair use, so there shouldn't be any problems.  I had to redo the fair use rationale and all that, but it reads basically just like yours did.  Hope this is okay!  Screenshots, in my experience, just behave really weirdly, LOL.  Great work on the article, btw. :) --hamu♥hamu (TALK) 20:27, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Nanjing International School

message: ----------
why should people additionaly click on [show] to see the reading (so called "transliteration") -- because their index fingers are made of iron and the more clicks they make the fresher they feel?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.233.129.146 (talk) 08:46, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

message: This article had become hopeless spam and copyright violation. I have therefore performed a deep revert to a clean version from August 2008. Please would the relevant editors take note of our policies and guidelines, and in particular WP:COI. --Ohconfucius ¡digame! 04:02, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massive problems with this article
Talk:Habari

message: The content is from the project's actual project page on Google code. I believe the creators of this open source software would agree that the usage of the language from the project web site is being used appropriately.
:I am sorry but that is not sufficient. We have to be sure. I have removed the problematic section. CIreland (talk) 18:48, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google

message: Flag was removed due to:
* Inclusion of several secondary sources referencing Habari
* No discussion on this page disputing the noteability of this application
Morydd (talk) 17:32, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Noteability Flag

message: I have reverted Tushos edits. Make no mistake - Tusho was only acting to appease me and since that appeasement is totally unnecessary I have reverted is edits Misterdiscreet (talk) 14:43, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversion of Tusho's edits

message: The Habari project seems dead, the web server returns 502 Bad Gateway, latest commit on GitHub was over 2 years ago.
Iromeister (talk) 14:51, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Project seems dead
Talk:Mixer (appliance)

message: what simple machines go into the mixer?
whisks go in the machine  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.104.138.231 (talk) 22:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there any reason the KitchenAid and Sunbeam MixMaster are singled out for separate mention in the article, except promotion of those companies' products?  Unless someone comes up with some sourced notability, I'm going to delete these slimy little attempts at viral marketing.  --ChetvornoTALK 00:51, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  --ChetvornoTALK 14:08, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Spam?

message: Egg Beater should better redirect to kitchen-robot and not to "mixer (cooking)". Țhe mixer is a handheld appliance in the kitchen not a (cooking) while a kitchen robot includes a plastic container which it uses to whip sweet-cream, beat eggs, and homogenise different pastry dows, using flower salt baking 
powder water eggs maybe vanilla and sygar, kitchen ingredients.
what is the diffrences between a consumer Kenwood KM070 and the mixers?
188.25.51.47 (talk) 20:09, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  whipping disambiguation 

message: The article says that "Heavy duty commercial models can have bowl capacities well in excess of 100 quarts (95 liters)".  This is formally correct (100 quarts is between 94 and 95 liters), but sounds strange.   Isn't "well in excess of 100 quarts" more than 100 liters? --194.166.241.102 (talk) 22:51, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  in excess of 100 quarts 

message: If this is an already decent length article about mixers in general, why was it re-titled and the lead changed to be about hand mixers? I see this was done by User:Störm in January and February.
If there doesn't turn out to be a particulary good reason to for these changes, I'm going to revert them. If hand mixers are notable enough as a subsection of mixers, then certainly a separate article could be created for them and linked to from this article with the Main template. But currently the article is about mixers in general, and the title and lead should reflect that. --Veikk0.ma 22:46, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: done. Störm (talk) 06:58, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixers or hand mixers 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Stirrer (cooking) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 27#Stirrer (cooking) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Stirrer (cooking)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: This article has a mention of the handheld egg beater. I'd be quite interested in spinning this off as it has an interesting history. Mixers and egg beaters are quite different so I'm wondering what you think. —Panamitsu (talk) 11:00, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we spinoff egg beater?
Talk:Prostitution in Ukraine

message: * Added information to opening paragraph
* Added a sentence to demographics
* Created three new sections: Exportation, Legal Status, and Health Effects
Edited by student editors as part of First Year Writing Fall 2016 class at Northeastern University. All edits were made in good faith.
Odork (talk) 15:45, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes Made as of 11/22/16 

message: the current status section has been eliminated and the information has been included into the legal status section Sssptm (talk) 16:09, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change made to current status section 

message: * added a new section on child prostitution  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sssptm (talk • contribs) 15:59, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes Made as of 11/29/16 

message: The article seems very good, it just has some grammatical errors, such as in the Child Prostitution section: , "the pimp", ;  last sentence in the first paragraph - the group most prone to prostitution; and the first sentence in second paragraph.
ItsTriki, Sleepislife2016, RenjiaGuo  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ItsTriki (talk • contribs) 16:07, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Review
Talk:Georg Paul Thomann

message: ...the group solved with pure fiction the philosophical and bureaucratic dilemma usually attached to the system of representation.
What does this mean? How about if, before we start telling "an interesting story related to" the subject, we actually explain the subject? --Tysto (talk) 00:47, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why was this hoax created?

message: (Redirected from List of fictional artists) -- Why can't i find a list of fictional artists?  I mean, there is a list of ficitonal rabbits!Kdammers (talk) 05:08, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional artists 
Talk:Sopot International Song Festival

message: This section is completely unreferenced and looks very much like WP:OR. Sources? The purpose of the whole section? Ptrt (talk) 07:15, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparision with the Eurovision 

message: Rotaru participated only in 1974 and Marion Rung won that year. Rubikonchik take a close look at the cited source and please stop reverting that info. --Jaan Pärn (talk) 21:46, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sofia Rotaru did not participate in 1973

message: Reference i provided See below was blocked.....may someone provide an Alternative. Thank you. Freshymail-user_talk:fngosa--the-knowledge-defender 11:44, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Biggest music festival in poland

message: What do you mean when the article says right down below that it was officially called Intervision Song Contest in 1977-1980? You could just as well say Sopot Music Festival Grand Prix and Sopot Top of the Top Festival were separate contests, when they are just the names of the contest in different years? Jaan Pärn (talk) 17:29, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Intervision a separate contest?

message: Who or what is this ? Thanks.76.113.104.58 (talk) 19:04, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amber Nightingale
Talk:Kidsongs

message: R.I.P 2004 (2004-2023)
Sony Wonder.
Didn't Sony Wonder replace Warner Bros. Records for the last season on PBS. I remember the later episodes having the Sony Wonder logo at the end when I saw them on PBS. Could someone verify this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.167.228.35 (talk) 01:10, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Yes, you are correct.Sony Wonder did fund at least one of the PBS series of The Kidsongs TV Show. I have access to the records, and will update this page shortly. BillyBiggle (talk) 19:50, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  sony wonder 

message: So I'm trying to wikify these songs, and I'm not finding anything with this name--anyone know if, as I suspect, this is "The Wheels On the Bus"? You know--"The wheels on the bus go round and round/Round and round/Round and round/The wheels on the bus go round and round/All through the town..."? Also, if anyone could manage to toss me a few lyrics to the unlinked songs, I think I could figure out if there's an alternate title. Thanks....GJC  06:28, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Bus Song" 

message: These recent edits reverted the article to an almost identical state to that of this 2014 version, which contained numerous errors that have been fixed in the 243 subsequent revisions by 87 users. I have reverted the edits accordingly. --AussieLegend (✉) 09:32, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism? 

message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahAYepP7pLA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJF_mMcknls  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:9001:560C:39AF:B4B6:2A0D:1F69:C330 (talk) 00:04, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  2021
Talk:Casualty loss

message: I looked over the article “Other Casualty” under Internal Revenue Code § 165 (c)(3) and thought, man, that name is long and awkward and isn't this known as casualty loss?  Lo and behold, Casualty loss is an article already in existence.  I think “Other Casualty” under Internal Revenue Code § 165 (c)(3) should be merged into this article.  It has some good content on the revenue procedures/rulings.  After the merge, we can put a redirect to this article.EECavazos (talk) 19:14, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Merger complete.EECavazos (talk) 20:37, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge [[“Other Casualty” under Internal Revenue Code § 165 (c)(3)]] into this article

message: I'm not sure but casualty loss sounds like something that exists throughout the world rather than just the USA.  If so, then the article should be expanded on those lines.  If the topic is very common then the article's priority should go higher.  If the impact section is expanded to show that casualty loss is not esoteric and is in demand by the common person, then the priority should then go even higher.EECavazos (talk) 20:40, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Globalize?
Talk:Dreaming (Australian Aboriginal art)

message: Propose merger with Dreamtime. Somebody please create merger discussion boxes and tags. Thanks. Softlavender (talk) 02:16, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Dreamtime]] 

message: Ingolfson (talk) 10:11, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Would some images of aboriginal art make sense for the article? 

message: Could some people seriously improve this article. This does not give any degree of justice to the broad spirituality of Aboriginal Dreaming. Would suggest starting with this Thanks. LithiumEnergy (talk) 09:18, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for improvement of article
Talk:Circular 230

message: This article goes into a bit of detail on rules about federal tax return preparers in the United States. A proposed major overhaul of these rules is now being studied by the Internal Revenue Service, and some changes are about to be implemented. The proposals are covered in the article Tax preparation. The article on Circular 230 will probably need to be modified. And, there is going to be some topical overlap with respect to these articles. Famspear (talk) 04:40, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you be so kind as to add something (at least a paragraph) on this?  Much appreciated. Oldtaxguy (talk) 01:52, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New proposed rules for federal tax return preparers in the United States 

message: Note: The "covered opinion" rules were removed from Circular 230 in 2014, and section 10.35 was re-written.
See generally T.D. 9668, 79 Fed. Reg. 33685, at 33693 (June 12, 2014). Famspear (talk) 16:36, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Covered opinion" rules were removed in 2014
Talk:Crack tax

message: "Drug dealers sdfd." What is the sdfd supposed to be? --Bluesoju (talk) 14:12, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo in article? 
Talk:Clear Water Academy

message: I am new to Wikipedia, and I want to edit this page, as I am a student of this school and I can tell you that this is an ad for the school, so I need someone to show me a guide or something to help me edit, and to know what to take out.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xy123 (talk • contribs) 05:14, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I need help with editing.