lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jane Morris

message: I propose that this article should be renamed Jane Morris, as that is the name most commonly used (per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies)).  Currently, Jane Morris redirects here, so the change woould need to be made by an Admin. - PKM (talk) 01:37, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Who ever heard of "Jane Burden"? Of course it should be renamed. Rwflammang (talk) 19:44, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: And done! - PKM (talk) 18:24, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename?

message: Are we sure that her relationship with Rossetti was non-sexual? A number of authorities are uncertain or ambiguous on the subject. Perhaps that should be the emphasis: i.e. we can't be sure. IXIA (talk) 07:23, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Marsh's quotes from Jane's letters in later years suggest quite strongly that it was sexual.  Let me see if I can find something we can quote. - PKM (talk) 01:43, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Relationship with Rossetti
Talk:Hamoun (film)

message: Hi, I have created an article for this movie with whatever I could find out on the net and grasp. Please feel free to rewrite the plot if you think you can do a better job. Would appreciate it if you intimate me before removing contents from this article.
--Jaseerabubakar 15:48, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Improve the article

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/hamoon/Film?oid=1054000. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Maproom (talk) 22:33, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Whiteley

message: Please refrain from vandalising this page and the main article. This area is for proper discussion. 
Netarbiter 13:22, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

message: The demographics section is misleading if based on 2001 census data: owner-occupation of homes in Britain is widely reported to have fallen massively since that year (arguably due to the boom in Buy-To-Let and the increasing unaffordability of houses to first-time buyers); plus there has been substantial immigration to the UK since then, and a person aged 44 in 2001 would be 55 now. In summary, 2001 was a long time ago so it's a bit misleading to present this as "this is how Whiteley is now". (Also, isn't Whiteley a little bigger now than it was in 2001?) It would be interesting to know if more up-to-date information is publicly available. 46.208.117.27 (talk) 19:21, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics 

message: Parish Church, etc?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.11.224.224 (talk) 16:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Churches?
Category talk:Wikipedia administrators

message: The heading of the Cat says it points to user pages. I've used it on my talk, as I think that's more useful. Any consensus for widening the brief of the Cat, to include talk if that's what the admin wishes? --Dweller 12:05, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to talk 

message: Is not an administrator - or ever likely to be, being a vanity article - and should be removed. The creator of the article is not playing ball, so could a kind soul here do the deed? Thanks. LessHeard vanU 11:58, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Joseph A. Montione]] 

message: Hello. I have initiated discussion with Mushroom.  Please follow this thread.
Ref: Visual_DataFlex
Sincerely: Applause14, Peter  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Applause14 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notification Of Entire Programming Language Link deleted by Mushroom 

message: ...but some people are resisting. Enigma message 17:33, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I've been trying to populate this category... 

message: Whatever you guys are paying this guy: Kuru, he deserves a raise. He's tough, but good!
Darkbluesun (talk) 16:08, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kuru 

message: Was there a consensus for this move? I saw nothing but "oppose" but move went through anyway? FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:07, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Canadian Parliamentary Motion on Alexander Graham Bell]] moved despite talk page opposition

message: un.org  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.66.218.138 (talk) 06:22, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  UNO
Talk:Ritual (disambiguation)

message: , I'm not understanding why you keep removing this. Do you believe that an article being deleted somehow makes MOS:DABRED not relevant anymore? -- Fyrael (talk) 17:08, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I don't. On the contrary, MOS:DABRED is  relevant, as it instructs not to include red links to articles that are unlikely to be created. The fact that it has already been deleted is an excellent indicator, hence WP:WTAF applies nicely here. Joefromrandb (talk) 20:24, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Even if you think that DABRED doesn't apply, you at least have to acknowledge MOS:DABMENTION. I'm also not sure how you think that this entry is different from any of the song entries where we only link to album/artist. To me, those are exactly the same as having a novel entry which links to the author's article, which mentions the novel. -- Fyrael (talk) 07:41, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

text: I would also draw the opposite conclusion from there having been a deleted article for the novel. Even though notability was not established at this time, the mere fact that someone attempted to create an article suggests to me that it has a greater chance to one day exist than 90% of the other DAB entries that slide in under DABMENTION. -- Fyrael (talk) 14:26, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hayder novel
Talk:GameShark Pro

message: What's that little butten on the right of the gameshark for? 69.205.176.185 16:29, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Can you tell me all the GameShark Pro code prefixes and what they stand for?--Mathsexpressions 01:20, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are a lot of types and they're different for each system. 205.206.207.250 05:50, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been a while, but off the top of my head there are these and more;80 - 8-bit write, 81 - 16-bit write, D0/D1 - Activator code (always follow by write code... GS 3.0 and higher only!), 50/51 - patch code for linear write codes, F0/F1 - (M) Must be on code (used for bootup), 88 - GS button code (same as activator "joker" variation... "When GS button is pressed, do this."). EE - Same as Must Be On, code address never changes though.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.33.73.7 (talk) 18:38, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  GameShark Code Prefixes 

message: Changed a lot of information that was poorly written or just plain wrong. (N64 Gameshark Pro's internal software was excellent? Ha!) Much of the "How the GameShark" works described (incorrectly) the Game Boy version specifically, while the N64 Gameshark section contained poor grammar/wording, incorrect information, and even some link spam. It's also important that the device be referred to as Gameshark Pro, not just Gameshark, these are two different things!
We could use articles on the other systems too, but I don't know much about them. 205.206.207.250 05:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massive cleanup
Talk:Michelle Landau

message: #REDIRECT Talk:List of Nip/Tuck characters
I made some changes using information from another character's page, but as I haven't seen the episodes discussed I am unsure of the changes. However, please do not simply revert because I also made a number of grammer changes to earlier text that are large improvements. Jseipel 16:35, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Since so many fans literally hate this character, I took the oppertunity to create an unbias criticism section. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.183.19.220 (talk) 02:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism
Talk:First Zionist Congress

message: shouldn't the name be just First Zionist Congress?
Yes, it should! --MarSch 16:57, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed, will need an admin though Epson291 (talk) 08:48, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Highly weird considering wiki normally GOES OUT OF IT'S WAY to give the French name for placenames. 
Haps some sensitivity over the word "Bâle" and word "Baal"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.5.239.132 (talk) 05:43, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: "Basel" is how the place is called in the language of this encyclopedia and also how it is called in the language of the congress. So there is no case for French. Zerotalk 22:48, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why isn't Bâle - the French overname for Basel byworded?
Talk:Unidade real de valor

message: Interesting article. I'm a little unclear, however, how this differs from dollarization, at least in a functional sense. If the URV is equal and fixed to the value of a dollar, isn't this effectively the same as adopting the dollar as the operating currency? (I'm also unclear what happened after, did the new real remain fixed to the dollar? And for how long?). Apologies if I've misunderstood something here.--Gregalton 18:58, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This was a "temporary", but "figurative" dollarization. The URV was not legal tender, and served as a comparison to the Cruzeiro Real, so it couldn't really be called dollarization. It's as if they showed a price in Reais next to a price in dollars. When the Real was introduced, its value was derived from the URV (and therefore sans inertial inflation), but after that its exchange rate was not fixed, but a managed float regime which remained relatively stable (today it's at a $1.84, when a few years ago it reached something like $3.30).--Dali-Llama 19:26, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, this is helpful. So it was essentially just introducing new, better reais? And the URV was simply to be a currency that could be trusted (due to a long period of fixing), thereby breaking at least some of the inflation expectations of the population.--Gregalton 02:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: More or less. URV was a temporary reference of the real value of the currency. It was created because the legal tender eroded too fast with inflation, with prices changing every day. People were so "used" to increasing prices that they did it even without doing cost assesment. As a consequence, prices soared at an exponential rate which was not, per se, related to the deterioration of international reserves. Monetary inflation was a consequence of this "psychological" process. URV tried to break with this, and was successfuyl.jggouvea 02:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Understood - that's what I meant by inflation expectations. In other cases/places, this same process has been carried out by replacing 'old' (bad) currency with 'new' (better) currency, often unsuccessfully. In cases where successful, often with carefully thought out ways to convince the public that the same risks are not inherent, like gold-backing or other features. (New, improved money - with purchasing power!) But the URV's mechanism seems well thought out. Appreciate the help in understanding how this worked and relates to other places/cases.--Gregalton 03:13, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is this different from dollarization? 

message: http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2010/10/04/130329523/how-fake-money-saved-brazil
PureJadeKid (talk) 18:37, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference article 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unidad de Valor Real. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 17:59, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Unidad de Valor Real" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Zecca

message: This article confuses two differents institutions: the Vatican Mint, and the Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato, which is the ITALIAN Mint, located in Rome, not in Vatican City.
Zecca is the word meaning mint in Italian. BTW Vatican coins are struck in the Italian mint. --Carlo Morino aka zi' Carlo 13:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sports in California

message: Created article, by moving text from California Sports section.NorCalHistory 16:45, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article creation

message: This article could use some major expansion.
Nothing on running, cycling, sailing, sailboarding, roller skating, scuba diving, swimming, and numerous other sports, both pro and amateur in California.
Nothing on the America's Cup. The list could go on and on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.251.75.106 (talk • contribs) 
: If you think something can be added, per WP:SOFIXIT and as Shia LaBeouf says, "Just do it!". If you have a reliable source for it, go ahead and add it to the article. Zappa24Mati 04:19, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skateboarding but nothing on surfing? 

message: can someone please change that map its outdted saying the chargers are still in sd and the raiders still in oakland and theres no nfl team in la. and still has the warriors in oakland  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:9750:A140:9047:4534:63C1:DA90 (talk) 22:46, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  map
Talk:Ian Birchall

message: I have changed the reference to Birchall's notorious email addressed to Polly Toynbee back to version (pre-December 31) which read:
"Ian Birchall became infamous for a time in May 2006 for sending an offensive email to Polly Toynbee, The Guardian columnist."
The version of December 31, which read as follows:
"In May 2006 Ian Birchall was widely commended for his vigorous denunciation of £300,000-a-year Blairite journalist Polly Toynbee."
I see as misleading in that:
1) It eliminates the link to the original email Ian Birchall sent, which read:
"You (ie Polly Toynbee) are a loathsome overpaid hypocrite. Nobody would miss you for 5 seconds if you were dead like your despicable shitball husband. I should like to see you in a cancer ward screaming with pain and vomiting blood."
2) The erasing of the link does not allow readers to make up their own minds as to whether the comment is a "vigorous denunciation" or an "offensive email". Most people (I believe) would agree with the latter, but at least we should be allowed to decide!
3) Birchall himself confessed that he wrote the email in a "fit of late-night depression", adding (somewhat pathetically) "I have been ill recently" (See Harry's Place blog for more details: 
4) The December 31 2006 version said that Birchall had been "widely commended" for his noctural ramblings, but by whom? No references have been provided.
5) Does the inclusion of Toynbee's salary and political sympathies justify the insulting invective employed by Birchall? As a non-Blairite socialist, I think not. Whatever the case, let's not try to dress it up as a "vigorous denunciation".
--Bodhidarma 21:52, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Government of the Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: No consensus. After a much extended discussion, there is no consensus here.  estar8806 (talk) ★ 21:00, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Government of the Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia →  – Like Crimea and Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Republic of Crimea, and Nagorno-Karabakh and Republic of Artsakh. The we need article about geographic area. Panam2014 (talk) 10:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Abkhazia has been notified of this discussion. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 20:46, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Note that currently both Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia and The Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia redirect to the article about the separatist state, which is definitely should be fixed by someone (in the case of the former, with sysop rights). stjn 00:42, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Politics has been notified of this discussion. —usernamekiran (talk) 22:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 July 2023
Talk:Maia (star)

message: How can Maia be destined to be a white dwarf, if its mass is about 4 times the sun, and the Chandrasekhar limit is around 1.44 solar masses? As far as i can say, Maia is destined to become a neutron star or a black hole, not a white dwarf... If it is indeed destined to become a white dwarf, this should be explained.
:This material was a copyright violation, and has been removed. -- Beland (talk) 16:18, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: White dwarf?
Talk:List of current Pakistani chief ministers

message: Is Kashmir a part of Pakistan of is at an Independant country? Ranban282Ranban282 17:05, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Kashmir is a disputed territory between India and Pakistan. Some part of it is controlled by India and some by Pakistan. It is not an independent country. Marsa Lahminal (talk) 17:51, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Kashmir

message: Goodnight 119.160.69.27 (talk) 11:24, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pakistan 
Talk:Main Campus of North Carolina State University

message: Which buildings on main campus are notable and deserve space in this article? --Shanedidona 14:07, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Only buildings with a historical or unique quality worth sharing. As long as there is something for notability, put it down. --Triadian 16:11, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Lincoln Cosmopolitan

message: Attn Gwernol:
On the page about the Lincoln Cosmopolitan it says that the transmission was a four speed manual.  Lincoln used a four speed hydramatic transmission (automatic) manufactured by General Motors.  In 1955 Lincoln started to use their own automatic transmission which was similar to the Fordomatic.  
I tried to edit this page but I received a notice that I was blocked because my IP address is 61.91.191.2.  My IP address is 124.121.125.247 and my Internet Provider Server is 124.121.125.1.
This is not a big matter but I thought you might like to know.
Regards
Cheddyrod 17:08, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ibrahim ibn Muhammad

message: هذه ملاحظة مني، في كتاب التنبيه والاشراف للمسعودي المتوفى عام 346 ذكر ما يأتي عن ابراهيم بن نبينا الكريم: (( وكان من مولده إلى وفاته سنة وعشرة أشهر وعشرة أيام ))
وبحسب موقع ناسا(( الكسوف كان سنة 632 في شهر 1 يوم 27 الموافق للسنة العاشرة من الهجرية شهر 10 يوم 10 ))
فبجتهاد بسيط لربط الحدثين: فالولادة كانت في السنة الثامنة الشهر الاخير في اليوم 28. وهو ما يتماشى مع قول ابن كثير عن ابي سعد ان ابراهيم ولد في اخر السنة الثامنة
ونسأل الله قبول العمل ونطلب منكم النشر والتنقيح
:I ran the previous through Google Translate and got: 
This note from me, in the book of alarm and supervision of the deceased in 346 Masoudi said what comes from the Holy Prophet Ibrahim bin: ((It was from his birth to his death a year and ten months and ten days)) 
According to the NASA site ((Eclipse was 632 years old in the month 1 day 27 corresponding to the tenth year of the Islamic calendar month of Day 10 10)) 
Fbjthad simple to connect the two events: Having a baby was in the eighth year last month at day 28. Which is in line with many of the words of Ibn Abi Saad Ibrahim was born in the last eighth year and ask God to accept the work and ask you to publishing and editing
:I assume he's trying to suggest a different date for the eclipse mentioned in the article.   Of this, I can offer no opinion. TuckerResearch (talk) 23:03, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:   اجتهاد متواضع مني

message: The article Destruction of early Islamic heritage sites states: "In Medina, the Mashrubat Umm Ibrahim, the home of Mohammad’s Coptic Egyptian wife Mariah and birthplace of their son Ibrahim, as well as the adjacent burial site of Hamida al-Barbariyya, mother of Imam Musa al-Kadhim, were destroyed during this time. The site was paved over and is today part of the massive marble esplanade beside the Mosque." The source for this information can be found here: http://islamicamagazine.com/?p=424
However, here we have a picture of the grave, taken in 2011. So does it exist or was it destroyed?
Thanks, -- Gabi S. (talk) 06:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does the grave exist?
Talk:Marquess of Downshire

message: Yes the Harwich barony looks odd and indeed it is but represents a strange period in peerage creations where Lord X, Baron of X is the form given in the patent of creation. See Burkes et al for verification Alci12 17:10, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Here is some text that could be incorporated into this article:
In 1573 a Devonshire man, Moyses Hill, arrived in Ireland as a landless adventurer in Essex's army sent to subdue the rebellious O'Neill. As a 1957 booklet puts it 'in process of time Moyses' descendants became numbered amongst the richest, most powerful and most benevolent landowners in Ireland.'  Wills Hill, the 1st Marquess of Downshire, was a prominent member of Lord North's cabinet at the time of the American Revolution. Arthur Hill, the 2nd Marquess of Downshire, has been known as 'the gentle Leviathan' and the 3rd as 'a great Irish landlord' and as an innovative accountant. 
In 1607 Sir Moyses Hill bought the Hills' first manor in County Down. By 1883 they had the eighth highest landed income of the whole United Kingdom. They held 115,000 acres (465 km²) in Ireland and 5,000 in Berkshire, England, with an enormous combined annual rental income of £96,691. 
In County Down these acquisitions had come mostly from the families of O'Neill and Magennis. In the mid-19th century one could go from Larne (County Antrim) in the north to Blessington (County Wicklow) in the south without losing sight of lands belonging to the Hill family. The core was the Kilwarlin estate around Hillsborough in County Down. This features the old Hill seat of Hillsborough Castle, since 1922 Government House and subsequently the official residence of the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland. There is also Hillsborough Fort, still a treasured Downshire possession. 
In 1630 a Hill was instructed to form and keep a garrison of 20, and a bugler. Nearly four hundred years later the garrison is gone, but the hereditary Constable and the bugler remain. 
Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 22:35, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Text from [[Arthur Hill, 8th Marquess of Downshire]]