Talk:Miranda v. Arizona

message: I moved a bunch of text from this article to Miranda warning. I started a discussion on that article's talk page (here). --MZMcBride (talk) 18:21, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlap with [[Miranda warning]] 

message: This sentence appears in the second paragraph of "Subsequent developments": "Others, such as Jose Suarez, who had confessed to killing his wife and five young children, stabbing them more than a hundred times, were released." 
I have looked extensively online and can find no reference to this case. The only murderer I found named Suarez is Arturo, not Jose. He killed two male relatives and two children (not a wife and five children) in 1998, and his conviction in 2002 was not overturned because of Miranda.
71.176.206.27 (talk) 03:08, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the edit that added that anecdote to this article. It was sourced to this, a syndicated editorial by James J. Kilpatrick (here published in the Sarasota Journal in 1968), which identifies it as a NY case. I think WP:UNDUE or WP:NPOV might counsel leaving it out regardless of whether Kilpatrick presented the facts correctly because a highly partisan political column is hardly the best source for such material, presented to inflame rather than inform, and if this column is the only source for that story then that throws its veracity as well as its importance into question. No doubt there are academic works that have a more sober and comprehensive assessment of the effects of Miranda, even if critical. postdlf (talk) 03:48, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable fact 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Miranda v. Arizona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090525183921/http://www.law.duke.edu:80/publiclaw/supremecourtonline/editedcases/misvsei.html to http://www.law.duke.edu/publiclaw/supremecourtonline/editedcases/misvsei.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:57, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Was Miranda released from the custody? Or he just was in prison all the time between Supreme Court decision and retrial? 46.191.160.35 (talk) 09:34, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not clear 

message: User @Fluffy89502 added the sixth amendment to the "laws applied" section of the info box. They have previously added the same info [] and were subsequently reverted by user @postdlf. 
Please state your reasoning so others can respond. Hydromania (talk) 22:46, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There are two reasons why the Sixth Amendment about to be apart of the "laws applied" section of the info box. Firstly, the court ruling held that the defendant has a right against self incrimination (the Fifth Amendment) and must be informed of his right to an attorney (the Sixth Amendment). This is an usage of the two amendments in the case. Secondly, in his opinion Chief Justice Earl Warren states, "...the Sixth Amendment, which is never expressly relied on by the Court, but whose judicial precedents turn out to be linchpins of the confession rules announced today." , clearly showing that the Sixth amendment was utilized in the decision. This also shows why @postdif likely incorrectly removed it, as the sixth amendment wasn't expressly relied on in discussion of the case. Did I violate any Wikipedia norms? Please tell me on my talk page. ThatSuperNerd (talk) 05:02, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sixth amendment 

message: Why is this section here? It isn't related to the court case and the separate article on Miranda the person covers it already
2601:600:A37F:F111:8805:372:A691:8FCA (talk) 01:00, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Miranda's Death

message: I think that the above should redirect to this case, as there is no case by the same name. However, I have no idea how to do it. tomde24 (talk) 01:34, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirection of Miranda v. State of Arizona?