Talk:Serbian comics

message: Anybody else interested? I've edited the introduction, added the Golden Age and post-WWII sections. Any help and feedback are welcome. WimbledonGreen (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 04:05, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello there! Kudos! An excellent work! Thank you very much on behalf of all fans and creators of Serbian and Yugoslav comics. I am interested to contribute (but also lacking time chronically). I have all sources and literature so I can add some things - especially regarding Silver age comics, Belgrade Circle 2, Bauhaus 7, contemporary authors etc. Thanks! --Stripar (talk) 11:59, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revamping the page 

message: Would any other topic add to the entry? Such as formats, influences, conventions, censorship, etc? Or are those best included in the historical section? WimbledonGreen (talk) 05:40, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: As I said, an excellent work! I would suggest several extended topics or even separate sections: prehistory-protohistory-early history (visual narratives on frescoes, folk cards etc); bibliography (academic type); creative schools and courses; relationship between Serbian and all-Yugoslav comics; Serb comics in the world (divided by language regions: French, English, Italian, Hungarian, Turkish...); foreign comics in Serbia/Yugoslavia; typical genres; festivals; international relevance of Serbian alternative and underground comics, since 1970s; ethnic minorities' comics in Serbia (especially Albanian and Hungarian); academic comics studies... Also, the article is so good now that it would be great to have it in Serbian and other languages. Of course, I will add my contributions. Sincerely. --Stripar (talk) 12:27, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Sounds good. I'll focus on filling in the blanks here. All those red links trigger my OCD. WimbledonGreen (talk) 19:33, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  :) Do what you can, no pressure. I will add some things too, not only in this article. --Stripar (talk) 20:02, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional sections? 

message: :File:Mirko i Slavko.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
-- Marchjuly (talk) 09:22, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for File:Mirko i Slavko.jpg