Talk:Republic of China Armed Forces

message: An image used in this article, File:Rocn.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 19 May 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Rocn.png)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:09, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Rocn.png Nominated for speedy Deletion 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:National Anthem of the Republic of China which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 19:29, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Republic of China Armed Forces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060901214436/http://english.www.gov.tw:80/web/upload/11006614337393.pdf to http://english.www.gov.tw/web/upload/11006614337393.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060311012134/http://report.mnd.gov.tw/eng/pdf/all-1-360.pdf to http://report.mnd.gov.tw/eng/pdf/all-1-360.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070927205908/http://www.cna.com.tw/eng/cepread.php?id=200707100051&pt=1&LArr=200707100052,200707100051,200707100050,200707100049,200707100048,200707100047,200707100046,200707100045,200707100044,200707100042,200707100041,200707100040,200707100039,200707100038,200707100037,200707100036,200707100035,200707100034,200707100033,200707100032 to http://www.cna.com.tw/eng/cepread.php?id=200707100051&pt=1&LArr=200707100052,200707100051,200707100050,200707100049,200707100048,200707100047,200707100046,200707100045,200707100044,200707100042,200707100041,200707100040,200707100039,200707100038,200707100037,200707100036,200707100035,200707100034,200707100033,200707100032
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20141218232030/http://au.news.yahoo.com/070808/19/145op.html to http://au.news.yahoo.com/070808/19/145op.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20141218232032/http://au.news.yahoo.com/070912/19/14evg.html to http://au.news.yahoo.com/070912/19/14evg.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070926233924/http://www.uniforminsignia.net/index.php?p=state&id=173 to http://www.uniforminsignia.net/index.php?p=state&id=173
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150724071006/http://www.fpif.org/commentary/0112yemen.html to http://www.fpif.org/commentary/0112yemen.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:03, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Republic of China Armed Forces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cna.com.tw/eng/cepread.php?id=200707100051&pt=1&LArr=200707100052%2C200707100051%2C200707100050%2C200707100049%2C200707100048%2C200707100047%2C200707100046%2C200707100045%2C200707100044%2C200707100042%2C200707100041%2C200707100040%2C200707100039%2C200707100038%2C200707100037%2C200707100036%2C200707100035%2C200707100034%2C200707100033%2C200707100032
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071128050234/https://www.dsca.osd.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2007/Tecro_08-10.pdf to http://www.dsca.osd.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2007/Tecro_08-10.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721171931/https://www.dsca.osd.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2010/Taiwan_09-39.pdf to http://www.dsca.osd.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2010/Taiwan_09-39.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721171945/https://www.dsca.osd.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2010/Taiwan_09-37.pdf to http://www.dsca.osd.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2010/Taiwan_09-37.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721171956/https://www.dsca.osd.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2010/Taiwan_09-57.pdf to http://www.dsca.osd.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2010/Taiwan_09-57.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721172006/https://www.dsca.osd.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2010/Taiwan_09-03.pdf to http://www.dsca.osd.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2010/Taiwan_09-03.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721172014/https://www.dsca.osd.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2010/Taiwan_09-75.pdf to http://www.dsca.osd.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2010/Taiwan_09-75.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060217081808/https://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/10125/Goldstein.pdf to http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/10125/Goldstein.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:15, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article states that conscription in Taiwan before conclusion of a peace treaty with Japan constituted a "war crime". Is there any source to support this POV?
While Taiwan may have de jure been considered as "occupied territory" before conclusion of a peace treaty, so did West and East Germany before 1990, but both countries introduced conscription in the 1950s, and I'm not aware of any expert considering that to constitute a "war crime".
I think that section should better be removed from the article as unsubstantiated. VNPhone (talk) 05:49, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conscription in "occupied territory" a war crime??