lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:CBC Radio 3

message: many times longer than the Brave New Waves entry.
I smell a rat.
: You smell a rat because a 24-hour broadcast radio network has a longer entry than one single show does? Hey, CBC Radio One has a longer article than Madly Off in All Directions does, too! Call the National Post! Bearcat (talk) 18:15, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

message: The article New Music Canada, Vol. 1 has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
:A search for references found promotional references only, no references on article, no mention of notability, fails WP:V and WP:N
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist.  The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:25, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[New Music Canada, Vol. 1]]

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The R3-30 number-one hits of 2006. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Bearcat (talk) 18:25, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The R3-30 number-one hits of 2006 listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:BodyRockers

message: "The song "Round and Round" appears on the Bumpers and ID's of Canal 13 Argentina of 2013 "
Can anyone explain what this means? It is gibberish to me. Doing a bit of Google I find that Canal 13 is Channel 13, Argentina, and I think "bumper" might be a TV industry term, like the little graphics/music sequences where they say "You're Watching Channel 8 News!", etc. So someone is saying that a regional Argentinian TV station used this song as part of their internal programming in 2013?
70.20.40.215 (talk) 00:31, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What?
Talk:Lists of fictional humanoid species

message: The Vorlons are NOT humanoid, are they? At least not in the series, don't know about the books. I'd say they're more energy-somethings...  83.65.233.175 01:10, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops didn't look closely enough, apparently its just the comics section. I'll attempt to fix it.-Giant89 03:05, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments from 2006

message: This article seems to list specific characters in literature instead of species. For example, it should be Kryptonians, not super-man. Super-man is not a species of his own.-Giant89 03:03, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops didn't look closely enough, apparently its just the comics section. I'll attempt to fix it.-Giant89 03:05, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Species? 

message: I started this article 4 years ago, and now look at it. You humanoids have done some great work! Terrific fun! Cheers, Kingturtle (talk) 03:59, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  i love you humoids 

message: Elves are a humanoid species and appear in LoTR, Eragon, and other fantasy books. Why don't they appear on the literature list? --Fedelede (talk) 16:36, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elves? 

message: Should werewolves be included in this article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ma2x2tt (talk • contribs) 13:29, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Werewolves. 

message: I know the game said he's not elf nor demon now, but considering him as a species?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Klefenz (talk • contribs) 04:28, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illidan as a species?
Talk:Baseball Joe

message: I read these books when I found them in the library of the elementary school that I attended.  I found them interesting but, needless to say, I was appalled by their anti-semitism.Alloco1 02:22, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Here are some sources   - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 22:11, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:The David Letterman Show

message: this should not be merged with the other articles, any one that ever actually saw this show will agree. There was nothing like it at the time peopel had know idea what make of this sarcastic strange looking guy.  And it was on in the morning with many retired people mixed in the audience with the usual college crowd.  This article should be expanded and every show  that was on during it's brief run should be categorized and studied.
::I agree. I was only eleven when this show came on, but I remember that upon first watching it I thought both "This is a great show" and "This will never last, people will freak out." I do not remember the show (or my eleven-year-old self) well enough to know why I thought these things, so I would hope that this article will be expanded by people who remember. Thanks. Saudade7 23:29, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fifty Foot Hose

message: Statements such as "...together the trio created some of the most unique music..." and use of words such as "unfortunately" indicate a point-of-view.  --Bugturd  Talk 02:35, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Large parts of this article seem to have been taken directly from the allmusic.com article on the band, at.  For example, the line beginning with "Interested in the ideas of" in the first section is a direct (unattributed) quote from the allmusic article; the only change in that sentence is the spelling error regarding Edgard Varèse's name (which I unknowingly fixed), an error also present in the allmusic article.  -K. 138.23.89.187 21:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allmusic 
Talk:SPIN model checker

message: Hi, I would create a wiki article in which Model Checking Tools can be indexed. 
Now it is only a  subpage in my user space; 
I would to known if someone would add SPIN in the draft. 
Thank you so much.
PoorUser (talk) 14:37, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

message: Can it be usefully applied to a normal, sequential program? Thanks 79.75.108.54 (talk) 19:32, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  can spin be used to verify issues unrelated to concurrency? 

message: Sustainability is becoming more important for all companies, across all industries. 62% of executives consider a sustainability strategy necessary to be competitive today, and another 22% think it will be in the future. 92.40.171.141 (talk) 18:11, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Environmental sustainability 

message: Simply put, sustainability is a business approach to creating long-term value by taking into consideration how a given organization operates in the ecological, social and economic environment. Sustainability is built on the assumption that developing such strategies foster company longevity. 92.40.171.142 (talk) 18:18, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sustainability 

message: Sustainability 92.40.171.142 (talk) 18:19, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simply put, sustainability is a business approach to creating long-term value by taking into consideration how a given organization operates in the ecological, social and economic environment. Sustainability is built on the assumption that developing such strategies foster company longevity.
Talk:Semantic feature

message: 212.138.47.20 seem to have copied this article (named "On Semantic Features") from some unspecified source and did not credit the author, I don't know what should be done in this case. I just adjusted the text to Wikipedia standards. It's still necessary to make the links and some style adjustments.
Something should be done about the author though (at least reference him).
The article should be a compreensive collection of information about the subject not a thesis itself. Some major changes must be done by a qualified person in the subject.
Rend 02:41, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Lamport's bakery algorithm

message: It's, of course, of no theoretical import ... but might it seem a bit more natural to computer scientists to index the array from [0..N-1]? This follows more closely how many programming languages work.
I agree so that we maintain consistency.  JWHPryor 15:45, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree.  It's handy to have a quick summary to refresh your memory in addition to a link to the main section for further details. 67.6.222.36 (talk) 22:52, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree.  "Pseudocode" says what it's not, not what it is.  The point is that it uses common conventions that most people will understand.  Brackets are quite common for arrays.  Semi's help to delineate instructions.  If you remove all the "shorthand" symbols to make it read more like Engish, then it gets too wordy and starts to get ambiguous. 67.6.222.36 (talk) 22:52, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

text: They mean when no such primitives are available.  If you have various "atomic" operations, this whole thing is unnecessary.  I agree though that variations of this idea can be present in "lock free code" that avoids expensive instructions but still uses them when necessary.   Długosz (talk) 18:51, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: True.  This is an algorithm for when atomic operations are no available. 67.6.222.36 (talk) 22:52, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

text: I'd like to add that I have just read Lamport's original paper and the (a, b) < (c, d) syntax is lifted directly from that paper.  I can see why there was some interest in using that syntax here since it reflects Lamport's original language; but I think my point still holds: it is unnecessary, and this article would be better if it were eliminated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.176.49.46 (talk) 18:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree that it is unnecessary complexity. However I'd like to point out that the lexicographic order relation on tuples is very common in CS, and that Python is an example of a language which supports it. --203.173.240.168 (talk) 02:09, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

text: It should be better now  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.83.76.247 (talk) 16:29, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

text: So long as the number of threads never gets close to maximum number for integer, it won't overflow because unlocking threads will drop the max number down. Fnordware (talk) 16:25, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

message: The bakery algorithm does not require sequential consistency, but only safe registers (which can return arbitrary values when read are concurrent with writes, and are therefore clearly not sequentially consistent). Yet the article claims that the bakery algorithm does require sequential consistency. I have seen this erroneous statement cited in several places. Can I just delete the sentence? --N4n0g1g4 (talk) 16:31, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sequential consistency not required
Talk:EFNet

message: How is this different from WeArePhilosophy?  The links seem to go to the same page in both cases (note that WeArePhilosophy was up for deletion, and I believe recreated and presently seems to be up for speedy again).  Any ideas?  Thanks --Hansnesse 02:44, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and changed it to a redirect to WeArePhilosophy for the time being. Hansnesse 02:56, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I realized that the page had originally redirected to the EFnet page, and was recently changed by the same person who created the WeArePhilosophy page.  I resored the original redirect. --Hansnesse 03:17, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Connection to [[WeArePhilosophy]]?
Talk:Apple Springs, Texas

message: **It doesn't seem to be incorporated, and isn't even a CMA.  If these facts can be confirmed, they should be stated.
**It may not physically exist today.  Or, all the people may have left.  We can't tell.
**The town is so small, it once moved, so it could now be somewhere else.  We need today's verified location.
**The county's web site makes no mention of this place.  It seems odd a county wouldn't know of a town in its midst.
--Rob 02:57, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems with this article
Talk:Multiverse (Marvel Comics)

message: I've tagged this article for clean-up for three main reasons.
# It includes no real history to place it in context - when was the phrase "Marvel Multiverse" first used in Marvel comics, and by whom, is an absolute basic for any article like this, preferably with some references to writers, storylines etc. that have used the concept.
# It needs more citations from notable third-party sources, otherwise it looks like something off a fan wiki.
# That table. No-one, but no-one, is reading it and even fewer finding it useful because people are just chucking any bit of trivia in. Five examples should do it; I'd lean towards 616, the Ultimate universe for its' longevity, whichever one was the first to be introduced and named "Earth-whatever" in that actual story and not through some guidebook retcon years later, one for a film franchise as an example (maybe the Fox X-Men films for their longevity) and maybe one for a cartoon. Wikipedia is not a place for a screen-filling list of names Kurt Busiek gave the Avengers for two issues in 1998.
I feel like I'm shouting a lot on a lot of these pages recently but my God as a comics fan is some of this stuff embarrassing. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 18:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed 

message: Since the multiverse contains all possibilities, how is it ever going to be, you know, okay? Won't some of it always be pretty screwed up? If you're going to spend time agonizing over something like that, you may as well forget everything else, right? Except you can't, because it is everything else, isn't it? Just saying, though. – AndyFielding (talk) 06:55, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  One thing I don't get
Talk:Paris Kassidokostas-Latsis

message: I moved this piece of information to Discussion because it seemed based on speculation rather than fact.  Kept it here just in case I was wrong:
"Latsis family fortune which is managed by Spyro, includes more tha 40% in EFG Eurobank Egrasias, the greek arm of his swiss EFG Group and more tha 30% in Hellenic Petroleum the major petroleum player in the Balkans. Only these two holdings are worth more than 5 billion euro. It is very sensible to value Latsis family fortune at more than 10 billion euro. The forbes figures for 2004 are absolutely wrong. Latsis group also controls PrivatAir a big private jet owner and operator and Lamda Development a major real estate group based in Athens. From the point that Paris mother holds the 1/3 of the whole estate, Paris in a billioner himself for sure."
LissaExplains 03:04, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Banks (disambiguation)

message: add/remove single/plural types of banks, such as financial banks, river banks, banks (the context in which an aircraft banks)
: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Sir Joseph (talk) 17:19, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 June 2016 

message: * 
79.74.101.150 (talk) 12:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Banks]] 

message: 79.74.101.150 (talk) 12:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 June 2016 
Template talk:WikiProject Films tasks

message: I was really impressed with the Taskbars at :Template:WikiProject Military history tasks and :Portal:History/Things you can do so I lovingly plagarized them so the Film project will be better coordinated. Palm_Dogg 03:07, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, I think it looks good and should be useful as soon as people get more used to it. And when someone feels like updating the fields, I've used cat scan from the toolserver a couple of times, it's easy to find eg. film stubs that are also requested for expansion with it. - Bobet 01:58, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

message: What do people think of my adding little icons for each task type? I think it is eye-catching.--Supernumerary 03:10, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks good, but it could use some more icons. I don't know which ones, but if we use them, each section should have an icon. --Nehrams2020 04:45, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I love the skull and crossbones! I added a couple more images for slots that hadn't been filled. I also replaced a couple of icons that I thought weren't too clear - the duplicated puzzle pieces for expand and infobox. I also changed out the speaker icon for discuss with another speaker icon. Nuvola on the Commons is a nice resource for these. I'd like to find a reason to use the bomb and the flying saucer, though not necessarily right here right now. — WiseKwai 10:57, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think they're awesome! :) Cbrown1023 21:31, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Aesthetics

message: I added a watchlist feature to the task list.  If someone wants to modify this to make it look better, please be my guest. —Viriditas | Talk 02:10, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Watchlist

message: If you take care of something on the list, should you remove it or is there someplace we should post to let someone know so the To Do can be updated?  I smacked out the trivia from The Fly (1958), but didn't know if I should go change the To Do to another title or if someone else will do it later? Thanks AnmaFinotera 23:34, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can change it yourself, and if there is another film that has the same problem you can replace the  one you fixed with it. For example if you had an infobox for one of the requests, you can add another film in its place that needs an infobox. That way there is a continuous cycle of articles that need to be improved in the various categories. --Nehrams2020 23:47, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Updating
Category talk:Sydney Swans players

message: I think this should be axed/replaced by a "Category:South Melbourne/Sydney players". It seems bit odd talking about someone who died 50 years ago, and never set foot in Steak & Kidney, as a "Sydney Swans player". Grant65 | Talk 03:09, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah we should probably move it to :Category:South Melbourne/Sydney Swans players, but in the end it's still the same club just with a name change (we should also move Western Bulldogs players to :Category:Footscray/Western Bulldogs players based on people's thoughts) Rogerthat Talk 12:42, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comments
Talk:Najiba Ahmad

message: The text of this article appears to be a word-for-word cut and paste taken from a book about the writer. The book's details are as follows:
* Jesse Russell and Ronald Cohn, Najiba Ahmad,  Book on Demand, 2012, ISBN	5512315560, 9785512315569 See: Google Books
BronHiggs (talk) 01:10, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation?
Talk:Bong Joon-ho

message: Bong Joon-ho has been affiliated officially with several progressive and socialist parties in the Republic of Korea. Given that political themes are often attributed to his movies, this seems like relevant information to include. I know his affiliation to the New Progressive Party and Democratic Labor Party both have wikipedia-grade sources in English.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.135.34.27 (talk) 21:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it I guess. Just create a /*Personal life*/ subheader after /*Career*/ and insert it there. — BriefEdits (talk) 22:10, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  We should include his connections to the formal Korean left 

message: Have people heard anything regarding this supposed upcoming animated film? It’s listed in the filmography section (with attached film studios) - Are we sure this is moving forward? It could have hit snags, perhaps why he focused on Mickey 17. I remember news of this a couple years ago, and nothing since. Put me down as against having this in the filmography section while so spottily sourced. Inspector Semenych (talk) 05:03, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animated film
Talk:Vadim Shefner

message: Perhaps these two poems could be moved to Wikisource? And, come to think of it, are we sure they are not copyrighted? Ahasuerus 03:16, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vladimir Platonov

message: I just changed the name of the page and its content back to Vladimir Platonov from Uladzimir Platonau.
While I appreciate that Uladzimir Piatrovic Platonau may be the correct Latinized rendering of the Belarusian version of his name, this is not the name by which he is commonly known in English.  He is universally called "Vladimir Platonov".
A measure of the potential for confusion of this is that, stumbling across the page, it took me a few moments to figure out who I was reading about, even though I wrote the article initially! --Saforrest 03:17, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name version 

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee (Talk) 03:03, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment
Talk:Playdia

message: Is this console really 8 bit, I would be suprized being it is in the 32 bit era. If someone could get back to me on that one that would be great. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 20:53, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why did is a fifth gen console then? Sorry about the late reply. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 17:28, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 8 bit?