lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:William Pickersgill

message: What is ARLE?  Is it Association of Railway Locomotive Engineers? 82.21.65.109 23:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Maybe somebody could explain what a "Whitworth exhibitioner" is, as this is a somewhat specific term. The information available suggests that is / has been some sort of technical sponsorship / award. According to an article in the New Scientist issue dating 21 October 1982 "The Whitworth Foundation is prepared to offer four Awards to candidates of high quality to carry out an approved project of potential value to the engineering industry of the United Kingdom. These awards should lead to the designatory titles of Whitworth Fellow or Whitworth Exhibitioner. The granting of the titles will depend on an assessment of the final reports." Could that be referenced somehow? - 194.246.46.15 (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whitworth Exhibitioner
Talk:Quietism (philosophy)

message: I did a lot of searching, and could not find any reliable claim that she actually "maintained that she could not sin, for sin was self, and she had rid herself of self". This quotation, which I found all over the Web, is a parroting of an undocumented statement from The Columbia Encyclopedia (http://www.bartleby.com/65/qu/quietism.html). Chitu 18:43, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Madame Guyon claimed sinless perfection? 

message: Only just created this page a few hours ago - I'm amazed that people are trying to kill it off straight away.
In any case, the page is definitely not 'patent nonsense' as alleged. Anybody with an informed view of philosophy could confirm that there are a number of philosophers (active: McDowell/historical: Wittgenstein) who take the view that philosophy should offer no substantive theses (i.e. positive doctrines such as 'the world is physical'/'souls exist' etc.) but should seek instead to explain away apparent philosophical problems by showing that they are just misunderstandings. Austin's Sense and Sensibilia is a prime example of a work of philosophy that shows philosophical problems are the result of abusing ordinary language.
I accept that the page is not yet fully referenced (though note links to Wittgenstein, Austin and McDowell) but it is not nonsense. See the article on John McDowell for a reference to quietism (in the first section on Work).
-Bosphor 23:21, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you encounter any similar difficulties, go ahead and leave a note over at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philosophy.  If we're not all busy, you should be able to get some support. - KSchutte 02:18, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: An important part of contemporary philosophy. Definitely an article wikipedia needs. - Atfyfe (talk) 03:09, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Because the Schopenhauer stuff was about the other sort of quietism... Banno (talk) 07:03, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy deletion 

message: First, the term "quietism" is probably used in passing to describe a lot of thinkers. So just because someone gets called a quietist once, that doesn't mean they should be mentioned in this entry.
Second, this article is about a specific set of views that arose in western, analytic philosophy in the last 100-years that is widely known by the name "quietism". Obviously, that is not what editors mean when they add "Zen" or "Tao" or the "Grand Ayatollah Sistani" to this entry. If any of those really deserve an entry about their form of quietism, then we need some form of disambiguation (e.g. as we've done for Quietism (Christian philosophy)). They are not quietist in the sense this entry is about quietism. 
- Atfyfe (talk) 00:20, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Quietism (Other uses)

message: The linked articles in Danish, German, Spanish, French, Italian, Polish and Portuguese, at least, all actually correspond to the Quietism (Christian philosophy) article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.17.129.48 (talk) 04:58, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linked to 'Quietism (Christian philosophy)' in other languages
Talk:1987 Gulf Coast tropical storm

message: There's plenty of info here, and it's a start. However, the whole article needs to be looked at again for clarity purposes (for example, "the storm was not given tropical storm watches due to landfall was to come within 24 hours" doesn't make any sense). I'd recommend having someone (preferably a fellow editor) take a look at this and make fixes to it. Once that's done, it's fine for B-class. --Coredesat 23:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This PDF file has some good storm history on the storm. Hurricanehink (talk) 01:02, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo
Talk:Al Grey

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Al Grey (Gottlieb).jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for June 6, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-06-06. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:04, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Al Grey (Gottlieb).jpg scheduled for POTD
Talk:Endovenous laser treatment

message: The title of this page probably should be changed. "EVLT" is a registered trademark and marketing tool for one of the laser companies- diomed. There are at least 2 other companies making lasers for this purpose, and using different trademarked names. I believe a generic name for this page would be more appropriate- ?Endovenous laser treatment ?endovenous laser ablation. (Vein2 23:31, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I can't find the following source on pubmed.  They have International Angiology, the journal suggested by the weblink, but they don't seem to have anything by King, Eaton or Featherston, the three names I searched for.  Doesn't seem reliable for a medical page.  WLU (talk) 19:25, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreliable source 

message: We are interested in having our link (evlt.ca) added to this page on Endovenous Laser Treatment and eventually the varicose vein page. We are currently in the process of updating our website (owned by Sigmacon Medical), evlt.ca, to include even more information about laser treatment technologies, additional clinical white papers and trials, other treatment options, video animation and relevant media mentions about the treatment of varicose veins. 
We pride ourselves on being a top source of education about endovenous laser treatment and varicose veins for the Canadian consumer market and have owned and operated this site for nearly 10 yrs. Interested parties can easily navigate through our site, learn about what causes varicose veins and how they can be treated, what's new in the media and world of varicose veins, link to authority sites on phlebology, interventional radiology, and vascular health, and even find and communicate with a local clinic that specializes in laser (and other forms ie stripping, sclerotherapy, etc.) vein treatments to learn which treatment is most appropriate for them.  
We look forward to hearing from you and thank you for considering our request!
Best Regards,
Adam Cook
207.188.77.220 (talk) 19:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Link 

message: While I was wikifying the article, I found that it changed from American to Commonwealth spellings, often for the same words, repeatedly in the article. I went back to the beginning of the article, and I found that American spelling was used in the first version of the article, just one paragraph. I do not know if they have changed the policy or not, or if I have misunderstood it, but I think that you are supposed to go with the first version of the article, except when the article has a regional topic. If anyone objects, you are welcome to undue the spelling changes. I will not be watching this article, so if you want my attention for some reason, please post to my user talk page. It may take days or weeks for a response, but I will visit Wikipedia again, eventually. -- Kjkolb (talk) 04:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  American and Commonwealth spellings in the article
Talk:Tippecanoe and Tyler Too

message: I can't quite figure out what this article is about. A song? A political slogan? A logo? Is seems like there's just not enough context. -- Mikeblas 03:18, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's about a song (virtually the entire article is just about the song), and also discusses the slogan derived from that song (which as it happens, is much better remembered than the song itself today).  The slogan is only explicitly discussed in the last line of the intro, so I'm not sure where that confusion could come from.--Pharos 04:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  context 

message: It is possible to change "Works related to Tippecanoe and Tyler too at Wikisource" in "Full text of Tippecanoe and Tyler too at Wikisource"? Thanks.151.29.31.172 (talk) 18:18, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  wikisource / external links
Talk:Alakshmi

message: I have several other sources that say she eats sour food and is scared away with fire crackers and a clean home during Diwali, but I'll add this material later on. I'm just too busy to add it right now. This, like many of my articles, is an offshoot of another, the Kali (Demon). (Ghostexorcist 23:36, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More info

message: </font> with Jyestha (goddess) article considering that they depict the same deity. Chronikhiles (talk) 13:15, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Chronikhiles, this has been discussed earlier at Talk:Jyestha_(goddess)#Merger proposal. While they are identified many times, they are also considered distinct elsewhere. Redtigerxyz  Talk  17:16, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger discussion
Talk:Pre-flight safety demonstration

message: 1. The list of videos can get pretty long. I cleaned up so only those videos that are clear (and not an amateur filming of a video screen) stayed. They stand out either because of the language, the style (cartoon or people) or the in-depth explanations. AirOdyssey (Talk) 23:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Videos

message: Has any survey been conducted on how many passengers are watching the video, or how many are watching the manual show, and how many are wathcing if both of the video and manual are provided in a defined flight condition ???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.62.138.21 (talk) 05:07, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effectiveness of the safety demo .... Video vs Manual 

message: 1. The article says that the information in the video or demonstration is available in English. I believe that Royal Air Maroc provides their safety briefing in French and Arabic. Is this a law or is it just the norm?
2. I have never heard any airline ask passengers to ask permission to use electronic devices. Is this a current requirement?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.106.88.56 (talk) 07:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy of information 
Talk:Conolly's Folly

message: Editors - please note that the article name is actually correct. The spelling is the less common version of Connolly but is nonetheless legit. I inadvertently "corrected" it in error as, apparently, did someone else before me. It's correct - leave it! :) - Alison☺ 23:40, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: It has always been called The Conolly Folly, as seen on Noble and Keenan's 1752 map of Kildare etc. "Conolly's" is a misnomer and bad for wikipedia, as it has been mentioned as The Conolly Folly in lots of architectural history books since 1740.86.46.255.117 (talk) 12:56, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Chandigarh College of Architecture

message: I tagged this page as unverified because the main section - 'The Chandigarh Experiment' - is a reiteration of text on the College's website, and the statements like 'most daring experiment' and '20th century's greatest architect' are not backed up on that external page.  They probably need reworking anyway to fall in line with encyclopedia style, but I thought tagging the whole thing as 'unverified' at least puts the right sort of spotlight on this. Squalk25 23:43, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Croatia men's international footballers

message: Added tags to 82 players (all existing articles on current/former Croatian national team players).
The following players did not have tags added, despite representing their country, because they do not currently have their own pages.
They are sorted by caps (descending), then surname (ascending).
Players with 9 or more caps can be found at List of Croatia international footballers.
 
Page	Name	Surname   	DOB	Caps	Goals
	Darko Butorović		Darko		Butorović		12.08.1970.		3  		0
	Mladen Romić		Mladen		Romić    		23.05.1964.		3  		0
	Niko Čeko		Niko		Čeko     		13.02.1969.		2  		0
	Josip Bulat		Josip		Bulat    		18.03.1972.		1  		0
	Ivo Ergović		Ivo		Ergović  		24.12.1967.		1  		0
	Damir Kalapač		Damir		Kalapač  		18.08.1963.		1  		0
	Mirko Pavličević		Mirko	Pavličević		17.10.1965.		1  		0
	Ivan Režić		Ivan		Režić    		15.09.1979.		1  		0
	Zoran Slavica		Zoran		Slavica  		28.03.1967.		1  		0
	Zoran Živković		Zoran		Živković 		01.01.1970.		1  		0
	Željko Župetić		Željko		Župetić  		23.09.1967.		1  		0
Information gathered 7 March 2007 from HNS (Croatian Football Federation)
Cloudz679 23:43, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Solon Borglum

message: A free image of him can be found here /Lokal_Profil 23:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Free image

message: This article has been expanded and improved and is not a stub; I have assigned it a B class since citations and writing quality are generally good.--Sarasays (talk) 14:58, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated quality rating
Talk:Crécy (comics)

message: There are a number of Warren Ellis interviews where he mentions Crécy - mostly talking about its significance as a publishing experiment for Avatar (a graphic novella that never goes out of print), rather than the content of the book itself. It's probably worth adding this in at a later date, once the article grows a little (I don't have any of the references to hand at the moment, but I'll revisit this once I've got time...). --Mrph (talk) 21:20, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worth a mention...? 

message: Quoting the book  
"This is a story about the English and the French and why the English hate the French. Which is because they eat frogs, they smell bad, and they're twenty five miles away.
— William of Stonham "
Did we have to advertise , this comic book is offensively " British " 
Regard 
Crazy_Defender_2 2A01:CB00:456:9C00:99E8:1FB2:9A7F:BE93 (talk) 22:38, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-French ' Francophobic " Propaganda .
Talk:Mike Mooney (American football)

message: This article has been requested for speedy deletion. I vehemently disagree here. Please see this from WP:BIO
Sportspeople/athletes/competitors who have played in a fully professional league, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport such as swimming, or at the highest level in mainly amateur sports or other competitive activities that are themselves considered notable, including college sports in the United States. Articles about first team squad members who have not made a first team appearance may also be appropriate, but only if the individual is at a club of sufficient stature that most members of its squad are worthy of articles. Third-party verification from a non-trivial publication outside of publications by sponsors of the sport or activity should be provided to demonstrate that the subject is widely recognized—meeting the first criterion—as performing in a fully professional league or at the highest level.
If Mr Mooney is not notable because he appeared in just one NFL game, then the submitter better go around deleting many articles including Eddie Gaedel!. Also, I was unable to find where this was deleted before as per submitter Mikemoto 03:33, 8 March, 2007
:I removed the speedy deletion tag. I was also unable to find a deletion via process (AfD), only a speedy deletion from earlier today; therefore criterion CSD:G4 does not apply. In addition, guidelines recommend keeping articles for NFL players, as noted above. However, additional information to improve the article beyond a two-sentence stub would be helpful; as it appears he died recently, perhaps it can be obtained from an obituary from a recognized publication. --MCB 07:01, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I found two online obituaries and added them as references. Note that both also make reference to his having played for the Houston Oilers as well as the Chargers, so perhaps the football database is incomplete. --MCB 07:21, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: Hello,
I have tagged this for a lack of neutrality:
It is a touching note but it is not currently encyclopedic.
Thank you, ritenerektalk :) 14:55, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality
Talk:Machmeter

message: Doesn't a mach number represent indicated airspeed over speed of sound?  Seeing as how speed of sound is already a function of pressure, and true airspeed is also a function of pressure, by calling it "true airspeed over speed of sound", you're effectively dividing by static pressure twice.  moeburn (talk) 03:37, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  True airspeed 
Talk:History of Maramureș

message: I planned initially to include this as a section in Northern Maramuresh, but realizing the size and the big common part with Maramureş county, I decided for a separate article. Therefore, most of my sourses are about Northern Maramuresh. For the same reason, sometimes, in the process of editting, I on purpose erased/dismissed info about the south. Therefore this article needs more attention in that respect. One sourse for a quick help would be to search with google. For example, Sighetu Marmatiei and Sapanta have excellent websites, also containing some history (I took only few selections from there - so you can help by adding more). 
I actually have all sections in my project space (you are welcome to view them there if you are impatient), but they need wikification and serious clean up. I'd rather not upload here unless I go through them at least once. Therefore, I am asking not to delete the empty sections. But, if someone wants to add something to those - be my guest. I will just upload my contribution below yours sectionwise, and then we will copy edit each section.:Dc76 00:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent edits! Dc76\talk 09:18, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: For those who want to help with this article

message: "In the 12th century, King Géza II of Hungary invited Saxons (Germans) from the Rhine regions to settle there."
But in the other section that is under this one sais that the land was unhabitated CarpathianEnjoyer (talk) 12:22, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unhibated or not? 

message: In this article there is a lot of talk about the Romanians and that they were present before the appearance of the Hungarians in this area, I would like what sources are used to say these things, such as when it is said "In 1215, two monks, Romulus and Ghenadius, left the Monastery of Râmeț ("Little Rome") in the Alba district in southern Transylvania to found the Monastery of the Saint Archangel Michael of Peri. In 1391, the orthodox Patriarch of Constantinople Antonius IV transformed this monastery into a Partiarchal Stavropighia with jurisdiction over eight counties: Maramureș, Ugocsa, Bereg, Ung, Árva, Ciceu, Sălaj and Bihorian Almaș. Different sources mention two different people as the first bishop - "Simon the Moldavian" by some and "ehumen Pahonius, a relative of the voevods "by others", I would like to know where they get this information from.
Thank you so much CarpathianEnjoyer (talk) 14:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What sources?
Talk:Jama'are River

message: I started this article and put in the description based on the name found on yahoo maps.  The map has the name of the river very close to the beginning before it reaches Nigeria's northern border.  I think changes name before this point but I am not sure, as decent maps of this region are very difficult to find. I'll leave the article as it is now but if someone could verify this or fix it if it is incorrect that would be cool. -AndrewBuck 00:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Actual Name
Template talk:Fandom content

message: Per the requirements of  this template was copied over and modified to work on Wikipedia from the :CentralWikia:Template:Wikipedia page whose contributor history can be found here .  00:13, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Template

message: Can it be used only for material from Central Wikia or is there an easy way to use it for individual Wikia sites? Robin Patterson (talk) 06:13, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean "individual Wikia sites"? Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 08:53, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: How to use it

message: With the update, the box appears to have be disabled when used on non-article talk pages? The test cases page does not show a box when used on talk pages. If it is to look like other talk page attribution templates, ie. , , etc. it should have a box when used on the talk page by default (this should work for any talk page, as code copied from Wikia could be used on templates). -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 00:17, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The code has not been disabled on non-article talk pages, as the code scans for the word talk in the name space parameter and if it finds it it displays the talk page box. See for example Template talk:Wikia content/testcases, and because of this edit you must have found that page seconds after you posted here . --PBS (talk) 14:07, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried purging it several times, and it didn't display any boxes. Weird that, wonder what happened. -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 09:23, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

text: A more important point is that placing attribution via this template just on the talk page of an article is not adequate attribution, either under the terms of Wikia's licence or under the terms of the Wikipedia guideline plagiarism guideline, so if material is copied from Wikia under a suitable copyleft licence then attribution should be placed in the article as specified in the plagiarism guideline. -- PBS (talk) 14:07, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It shouldn't be a problem to also additionally have it on the talk page though (so that it appears along with other attribution templates COPIED and TRANSLATED) . -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 09:23, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That option is still available see :Category:Wikipedia talk pages with the Wikia content template. -- PBS (talk) 11:20, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk page appearance
Talk:Henry Jickling

message: Jickling was only ever an "Acting Judge" of the Court. Accordingly, I'm not sure that this succession box is appropriate for him. Further, I note that the succession box says "Supreme Court Justice of the Supreme Court of South Australia". However, the early judges of the Court were not styled "Justice" but "Judge". The title "Justice" appears to have been introduced from 1 July 1856 when Cooper was appointed Chief Justice.
In my view it is not really appropriate to have a succession box for "Justices" of the Court since, from the time of appointment of George Crawford as Second Judge, there was no "succession" to the position of judge or justice - more than one person could hold the office.
Thus my proposal is as follows: remove the succession box from this page (Jickling) and the Sir John Jeffcott page. Alternatively, remove the succesion box from Jickling, change the Jeffcott succession box to have Cooper as his sucessor and the title "Judgeo of the Supreme Court" and add a second succession box to the Charles Cooper (judge) page. 
Steve mcdee 00:12, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is the guy's name Jickling or Jinkling?Zargulon (talk) 21:36, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name