lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Midol

message: The active ingredient in Midol for Cramps & Body Aches is ibuprofen, not acetaminophen.
:Its website lists acetaminophen.
Pyrilamine Maleate  is listed on the Midol website as a diuretic, not as an antihistamine.  The website also does not include details for a maximum strength product. mlhwitz (talk) 17:46, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

message: Does anyone have any idea or resource on why something with such prominent/recognizable branding as Midol would have such extreme variability in its formulation from one type to another, as well as through its history?  Seems like "Midol" doesn't really mean anything reliable in a sense..... even ibuprofen and acetaminophen could have very different subjective effects for a single individual in terms or menstrual pain?
::2001:569:BCC4:F900:98AA:19ED:29D0:3FB5 (talk) 00:47, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variability of formula  

message: The majority of the formulations listed do not have any NSAID components. They are acetaminophen/paracetamol based. The sentence "There are concerns drugs like Midol, which is an NSAID, increases risk of bleeding, kidney damage and has other negative effects on cardiovascular system." seems quite misleading given it is not an NSAID. That said paracetamol has its own issues.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.70.225.84 (talk) 23:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct, the Midol cited in this article does not contain a NSAID. Douglas w barns, PharmD 206.214.130.99 (talk) 14:24, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  NSAID?
Talk:Yarkant County

message: Is such a massive amount of text from so recent a book legitimate? 68.39.174.238 05:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "lengthy quotations" ! 

message: Seems like too many.  --Mattisse 01:38, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How can one article have so many templates? 

message: Since I am no expert of this particular section of Kashi Prefecture, I do not know exactly how the history section should be re-written. But here I will alert other editors to the issues at hand. The section is too lengthy, with the majority of it being a massive quote. This text block, even as a reference, cannot be so lengthy. It makes the article seem to have more content than it really does. ---华钢琴49 (TALK) 02:28, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History re-write 

message: The article nearly exclusively describes the town Yarkant, only part of the side box (coordinates seem to be from the town, too) and part of the first paragraph deal with the county. I suggest to either split or move&edit. -- Tomdo08 (talk) 01:09, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  County or city 

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=JxwPAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Title	Report of a mission to Yarkund in 1873, under command of Sir T. D. Forsyth: with historical and geographical information regarding the possessions of the ameer of Yarkund
Author	Sir Thomas Douglas Forsyth
Publisher	Printed at the Foreign department press, 1875
Original from	the New York Public Library
Digitized	Oct 11, 2007
Length	573 pages
Subjects	History › General
Rajmaan (talk) 19:16, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Report of a mission to Yarkund in 1873, under command of Sir T. D. Forsyth: with historical and geographical information regarding the possessions of the ameer of Yarkund By Sir Thomas Douglas Forsyth  

message: The new blockquote inserted by User Rajamaan about Chinese officials taking temporary local wivess is perhaps of some interest but I feel it may very biased and, possibly, inaccurate (present-day Uighurs, in general, are very dissapproving of relationships between non-Muslims and Uighur women). It is possibly more reflective of 19th century British prejudices than fact. Moreover, it may well be considered offensive. Also, I am not sure that these observations are of enough historical note to be worthy of quoting on a one page encyclopedia article on Hotan. I think they should probably be removed. Please - would other editors please comment? Many thanks, John Hill (talk) 21:11, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Should the new blockquote be removed?

message: Where in this article are the administrative divisions of Yarkant County listed? 76.189.141.37 (talk) 23:36, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Administrative divisions 
Talk:USS Walton

message: The following text was removed from the main article:
:Crewmembers from the USS WALTON (DE-361) are working on their very first reunion!Ê If you served on board the Walton, please contact Jerry Hudson to get your contact information on the list!!Ê Mail:Ê 4750 Co Rd 480, Tebbetts, MO 65080; Phone: 573-295-6335; Email: marjer67@earthlink.net!Ê Your fellow crewmembers are anxious to hear from you!
I'm placing it here in case anyone might find the info useful, but it doesn't belong in the article. - Bellhalla 23:07, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Reunion
Talk:AFL Queensland

message: Much of this info did not related to AFL Queensland, and was inappropriate for this page. Accordingly I have created a new page, Australian Rules football in Queensland for the background information.--dan, dan and dan 23:16, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What information on this page cojmes from sources 1 to 4? These sources are not specific. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources for information on how to correctly cite sources.--dan, dan and dan 06:34, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved info to new page

message: The following information needs sources:
# Formation of AFLQ and liquidation of previous body
# AFLQ divisions
# AFLQ teams
# previous governing bodies
Note that sources previously on this page only referenced whole years of newspapers, as opposed to specific sources (as required by Wikipedia:Citing sources).--dan, dan and dan 06:37, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Info that needs sources
Talk:Prince Alois of Liechtenstein

message: Should we re-title this as Alois, Hereditary Prince of Liechtenstein, to conform with the naming conventions.  As heir apparent he should be listed like Charles, Prince of Wales, Frederik, Crown Prince of Denmark and Guillaume, Hereditary Grand Duke of Luxembourg.  Thanks. Prsgoddess187 23:18, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:F.C. Tirsense

message: The article was started in Portuguese with the following:
:"O Futebol Clube Tirsense é um dos clubes históricos de Portugal, tendo como alguns dos seus mais altos pontos da sua história a eliminação do Sportin dos "Cinco Violinos" da Taça de Portugal, e a obtrenção de um brilhante 8º lugar na época de 1994 / 1995, ficando "às portas" de uma classificação para a Taça UEFA.
Actualmente, compete na III Divisão, resultado de gestões danosas nos ultimos anos.
Tem um site não oficial em "
The machine translation of the text goes like this:
:"The Soccer Tirsense Club is one of the historical clubs of Portugal, having as some of its higher points of its history the elimination of the Sportin of the "Five Violins" of the Goblet of Portugal, and the obtrenção of a brilliant 8º place at the time of 1994/1995, being "to the doors" of a classification for Goblet the UEFA.  Currently, it competes in III the Division, resulted of harmful managements in them we ultimos years.  It has a not official site in"
None of it was terrible verifiable easily, and I couldn't find anything on it in english, so I moved it here. - Taxman Talk 23:23, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:111 Huntington Avenue

message: 111 itself does not have a parking garage for 3,660 cars, the Prudential Center Complex does. There are some confused facts between the two in this article. It might be because the source blurs the line a little. 173.166.26.69 (talk) 23:38, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion with the Pru Complex
Talk:Herbert Croly

message: Herbert Croly and the New Republic self-identified as American liberal. See .
:I can't read the link because Britannica requires a subscription.  However, I think there is a difference between how a person defines themself and how history defines them.  While he may have considered himself a early 1900s liberal, I see him as an advocate of Progressivism as one of the thinkers that shifted the liberal ideology from the laissez-faire to interventionism.  If you read his work The Promise of American Life it seems clear he is advocating this sort of change.  In fact one of the people the article notes he influenced with his ideology, Theodore Roosevelt, ran for President as a member of the Progressive Party.  Though Croly may not have considered himself a member of the Progressive movement I would certainly see him as one of the ideological writers on which the movements based their reforms.  
:I see no problem with citing him as a progressive/liberal of the time.  If your problem with using the term progressive is that you do not think he was in fact a progressive of the time, I would disagree.  If this is your basis for not considering him a progressive, I would suggest you examine progressivism in terms of the early 1900s and see if you still feel the same way.  If the problem is the criticisms/negative connotation many people associate with the word progressive (similar to how so many today will not define themselves as liberal), and therefore he should not be associated with it, I think   I think it's incorrect to think of ideologies in terms of good or bad.  They are what they are.  I don't think there is any reason to leave out the term because of a lack of modern support for Croly's historical ideology.  CRobey 21:49, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liberal not Progressive 

message: We need to exercise caution when questioning whether people are progressive. Today progressive is used as a euphemism for left-wing. Look at what progressive involved in the time the term was coined. Avoid holding political thinkers of the early twentieth century to political measures of the early twenty-first century. Instead, default to whether he was termed a progressive or whether he considered himself one.Dogru144 (talk) 13:31, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time period and progressive
Talk:Murder of William Robinson

message: What is the context or importance of this article?  While a murder in 1868 is perhaps interesting, this article has no context to put it into.  There are hundreds of murders a year, and presumably many dozens in 1868. Why is this murder notable or significant that it should be included in Wikipedia? --Lendorien 23:42, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Robinson's murder is set in the context of BC of the time, and has become the subject of varous studies/publications because of its import for inter-racial history in BC; yes, there were lots of murders even in BC in the 1860s....but many of them, also, will ahve articles as noteworthy in some way or other.  "It's an issue in modern historiography", i.e. Robinson's murder, although yes there are more notable murders like that of James Barry and the Poole family; but I can't see a reason to exclude this article....Skookum1 (talk) 14:08, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect that the subject is notable, but we should have more sources to demonstrate that he has been subject of more than just one secondary source. Skeezix1000 (talk) 19:25, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Not sure of what to dab it as - William Robinson (Canadian settler) maybe or William Robinson (Salt Spring); but definitely not what it's currently called.Skookum1 (talk) 14:08, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with page move to William Robinson (Canadian settler), as proposed.  WP:CANSTYLE states that the initial disambiguation should be to "Person (occupation)", and if necessary due to naming conflict (which exists here as there is a William Robinson settler in New Zealand) then to "Person (Canadian occupation)".  Skeezix1000 (talk) 19:25, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd forgotten this discussion when I made the just-now dab change to "murder victim".  Also as it was 1860, and this wasn't yet Canada, the other dab would/should have been "British Columbian settler".  The degree to which this page is really a pastiche of its source website should also be considered; are there other sources? Skookum1 (talk) 14:25, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And actually, Saltspring was not part of the Colony of British Columbia, but rather part of the Colony of Vancouver Island, so the said dab would have been "Vancouver Island settler"; "murder victim" seems more apt in any case.Skookum1 (talk) 14:26, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move/rename/dab issue
Talk:Jill de Jong

message: Height, 1.52m is definately not 6'.  Assuming that it should be 6' as she's a model. that's more like somewhere around 1.8m
: I saw her and she's very tall. I am scared. Her shoulders are wide.--85.26.241.99 (talk) 13:24, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Height?

message: The bulk of this article looks like a copy and paste from this site   - It could just be a general press release that everyone has repeated verbatim but it needs checking out. - X201 13:07, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio?
Talk:Thomas Hoving

message: It'd be nice if someone (more knowledgable than myself) could add some information about the Sarpedon scandal here.
:The page on the Euphronios krater is probably the better location for this. Hoving's book "Making the Mummies Dance", which details his personal experiences at the Met, has at least one chapter entirely devoted to this episode, and might be a good jumping-off point (at least for his involvement in the piece's purchase). Best, Docether 13:35, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The glaring omission from Hoving's bibliography is his magnum opus of his later years, Art for Dummies. AfD is playful, light, yet quite informative -- excellent preparation for going to an art museum, or making sense of a visit to one upon your return. Although AfD is mentioned, it gets short shrift in my opinion. http://www.amazon.com/Art-For-Dummies-Thomas-Hoving/dp/0764551043 50.0.36.121 (talk) 22:59, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Art for Dummies

message: This person is responsible for the pigeons being labeled "Rats with Wings".  , thanks Marasama (talk) 00:18, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rats with Wings
Talk:Galileo affair

message: I would like to add the entry below to the "List of artistic treatments" section; however, I don't appear to have sufficient permissions.
Galileo  is a rock musical  written Danny Strong  with an original rock score and lyrics by Michael Weiner  and Zoe Sarnak. It was first performed in 2024 at the Berkeley Repertory Theatre  where it was directed by Michael Mayer , and starred Raúl Esparza  as Galileo.
Note:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei already includes the following:
A rock musical about Galileo's life, called Galileo, premiered at Berkeley Repertory Theatre in May 2024. Michael Mayer directed the musical, which had a book by Danny Strong and music and lyrics by Zoe Sarnak and Michael Weiner. Raúl Esparza starred as Galileo. Halcabes (talk) 05:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This is pure WP:TRIVIA and thus it should not be present in a WP article. Veverve (talk) 12:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition to "List of artistic treatments"
Talk:Freehand technique

message: Not only is gravity roll a less generic, more slang name, but the article itself says that very few can do it, when it's actually not very hard at all. Evan Seeds  (talk) 23:49, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gravity Roll merger 

message: The description of the technique on this page is even worse than in the gravity roll article. Could someone please try to clarify how the technique is performed? - Quirk 09:17, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description
Talk:Geography of the Soviet Union

message: *Geography of the United States
*Geography of the United Kingdom
Might be worth having a look to see if we can improve the layout based on either of these (even though they aren't that good). The text is pretty thick at the moment. - FrancisTyers 20:26, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Some similar geography articles

message: Hello.
I think it is quite preposterous that there isn't a single map, physical or political, of the USSR - in the geography article no less! There might be some reason in the guideline which I'm not yet aware of, but I'm quite certain there isn't. I'm still quite new and I'm not sure how to add a map, so can someone, for the sake of the readers, add one - or atleast explain why there isn't one?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodguy1066 (talk • contribs) 15:54, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  No map? 

message: Thanks for suggesting to merge my article into this. :)--ThelnformativePerson (talk) 02:15, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  My article 

message: The last sentence of the lead says that
:The USSR had a geographic centre further north than any other country except Canada, Iceland, the countries of Scandinavia[citation needed], as about three quarters of the country was above the 50th parallel north.[1][2]
What about Finland (which is Nordic but not Scandinavian)? 
For that matter, "country" needs to be replaced with "independent country", lest Greenland be another counterexample. Loraof (talk) 04:04, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geographic center
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Pigsonthewing/Proposed decision

message: :"On this case, no Arbitrators are recused and 2 are inactive, so 5 votes are a majority."
Does this mean that remedies 5 & 6 relating to revert prohibition/limitation on Pigsonthewing have both passed? They would seem to be incompatible with one another unless I misunderstand something. I think the case is already technically closed, so perhaps I am supposed to ask at RfClarification. -Splashtalk 23:54, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume that both revert bans are to run consecutively. If not, then, yes, it seems that they conflict.--Sean|Black 00:06, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Then we need to know which runs first... -Splashtalk 00:09, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

text: I am by no means an ArbCom expert (in fact, I'd go so far as to say I'm an ArbCom idiot), but I could have swore I read somewhere that each vote against nullifies a vote for. So right now remedy 5 would have only 4 votes (not a majority) if it works as I suggest. But I may be wrong. =) —Locke Cole 00:10, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well..  WP:AP says majority (even though for every other vote it seems that a vote against cancels a vote for). But it doesn't define what happens when two nearly identical remedies pass as these two seem to have. —Locke Cole 00:19, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As I understand it: Injunctions and close are four net votes. Findings of fact, remedies, and enforcement are simple majority of active arbiters (5 in this case). Handling of overlapping remedies... no idea. --CBD ✉ 00:27, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflicting remedies?
Talk:Geologic map

message: in UK english, the geologic map is called geological map, can this sort of thing be mentioned in an article?
HolgerK 20:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This should probably be added somewhere EdwardLane (talk) 16:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: New geological map

message: Identify and mark active and inactive faults on a map of the Philippines 49.145.133.141 (talk) 13:11, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science Earthquake
Talk:Triplane

message: The article says:
:"immortalised as the aircraft most closely identified with Manfred von Richthofen, the 'Red Baron'."
The truth is, von Richthofen more commonly flew the Fokker D.VII, which became so popular it was placed in licence production with Albatros. The Dr.I was championed by him, but never (or rarely) flown operationally by him.  Trekphiler 00:18, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

message: If this nomenclature really is in use, then (a) there should be a referenced source and (b) it should have an article of its own. This one is for aircraft with three pair of main planes, surely? --TraceyR (talk) 15:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tandem triplane 

message: The purpose of triplanes having three sets of wings is not discussed. How do planes of such small build benefit from having so many sets of wings?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.240.152.3 (talk) 11:52, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  purpose of having three sets of wings not discussed 

message: The section on other multiplanes is out of place here. Neither this section nor the remaining article is large enough to stand on its own. I propose moving the whole article to a more general title, say Multiplane (aircraft), and rearranging the content accordingly. Maybe later, when both halves are large enough to stand on their own, the article can be split. Comments? -- Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 12:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiplanes - proposed article move

message: I have drafted a List of triplanes. It's fairly long, but not horrendously so. Should it be added to this article or should a separate page be created for it? — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 22:42, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Enough content for a seperate list article in my opinion. MilborneOne (talk) 22:50, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the size of this article currently and the size of the list, I concur that it should be at List of triplanes. (Nice work BTW!) - The Bushranger One ping only 22:54, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Now moved to List of triplanes. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 13:39, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of triplanes 

message: The first heavier-than-air craft to carry a person in free flight was a triplane, as far back as 1848 and long before the advent of powered flight. - Eh ? Are there any details available ? Even pictures ? thanks, --129.187.244.19 (talk) 08:53, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The best information available on Wikipedia is at Early flying machines. In particular, see Early flying machines#Sir George Cayley and the first modern aircraft. Dolphin (t) 12:48, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  1848 ?
Talk:Pan-African Congress

message: This was previously redirected to Pan-Africanist Congress, something else entirely. The Pan-African Congress was a series of meetings in the early to mid 1900s and should be a separate article. --Lucent 00:23, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.blackpast.org/?q=perspectives/pan-african-congresses-1900-1945. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:36, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: 1. I'm currently working on updating information and adding new sections to the 5th Pan African Congress (section) on this page. This will include the following sub-headings - Delegates - Issues addressed - Resolutions - Manchester - Reception- Legacy and Aftermath- Commemoration - Archives - Bibliograghy. The sections and content totals 7 pages in Microsoft word. Drewellery28 (talk) 09:23, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideas + proposals