lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Four-sided die

message: Why is this listed as a stub?  Look fine to me. --Drmike 14:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: Who are they? Google reveals nothing of use (except this page) --Lardarse 05:57, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NGDA 

message: Would the following link be sufficient to act as a source for the Caltrop nickname of the four-sided dice?
http://diceaholic.wordpress.com/2012/01/31/dungeons-and-dragons-dice-dd-dice/
I'm not very well versed in the notability rules for sources. 98.202.95.55 (talk) 17:25, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It could be - the best place to go would be WP:RS/N. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 17:41, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

text: That page is daunting.  Do I just edit the talk page and ask if it is appropriate? 98.202.95.55 (talk) 00:03, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Go to where it says 'Click here to start a new discussion' and follow that link to ask your question. 24.12.74.21 (talk) 01:46, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The source is not reliable as it is not the blog of a well-known expert. Binksternet (talk) 20:16, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm fairly certain 4-siders (especially the original yellow TSR ones) have been called "caltrops" (when they're called anything printable at all) by anyone unfortunate enough to step on one barefoot. Given that their original users had started as medieval-focused wargamers, it would be more surprising if they didn't use the term. That's going to be a bear to document, though, because it's gamer slang, the sort of thing that nobody ever really wrote down. By the time the academics of the world even noticed that the RPG subculture existed, those needle-sharp TSR four-siders (which I know from personal experience could, and did, draw blood) had been long ago replaced by less pointy ones, so the use of the "caltrop" nickname was probably less widespread. Worldwalker (talk) 20:42, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Caltrops
Talk:Entomophobia

message: There is additional information in the history of the Lepidopterophobia redirect which could be used to expand this article. —Anne Delong (talk) 22:47, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Lepidopterophobia]] 

message: Fear of ticks. 2601:5CD:C200:AA2:C0DA:2D8F:BACB:EA52 (talk) 02:27, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  There's also [[entonophobia]]
Talk:D.N. Wadia

message: This page about the same personality was in existence from 12 July, 2007. Since both the pages are snubs, we can improve the older page, and put a redirect in this page. 
--Tharikrish 14:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. John Carter 23:25, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Darashaw Nosherwan Wadia]]
Talk:B53 nuclear bomb

message: The article states:
:"Two variants were made: the B53-Y1, a dirty weapon using a U-238-encased secondary, and the B53-Y2 "clean" version with a non-fissile (lead or tungsten) secondary casing. Explosive yield was nine megatons."
But, surely these two versions had very different yields?  I would expect hte dirty version to be more than twice the power of the clear version.--ManInStone 14:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dirty and clean

message: I think there may be an error in this section
"The W53 warhead of the Titan II ICBM used the same physics package as the B53, without the air drop-specific components like the parachute system, reducing its mass to 8.13 lb (3.69 kg)"
Just seems a tad light to me.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.54.175.253 (talk) 01:38, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error? 

message: The following segment: "The B53 was intended to be retired in the 1980s, but 50 units remained in the active stockpile until the deployment of the B61-11 in 1997. At that point the obsolete B53s were slated for immediate disassembly; however, the process of disassembling the units was greatly hampered by safety concerns as well as a lack of resources." appears both in the "History" and "Role" sections of the article. Perhaps some-one should do a clean-up of the article. Don't want to do this myself, since this article is well outside the scope of articles I would undertake such work in :) Hargir (talk) 06:49, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up needed? 

message: Does anyone really use joules rather than kilo/megatons when discussing nuclear weapons? I don't think that particular conversion is necessary. Additionally, the input units in the conversions throughout the article change from imperial to metric and back again. I will fix these to reflect imperial inputs for consistency's sake. Dziban303 (talk) 13:11, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units and conversions 

message: Would a photo of a B53 from the Air Force Museum be helpful to the article?  I believe it's of a bit better quality than the current photo from the Atomic Testing Museum. Craigbucher (talk) 20:59, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos
Talk:List of significant Robot Wars contestants (UK)

message: Should X-Terminator be in here? It has its own article, but Firestorm is more significant than this, and doesn't have an article, but is in the minor article instead! So, should X-Terminator be here? Some Guy (Izzy259) 14:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: X-Terminator

message: This is subjective until someone explains otherwise. I don't see why X-Terminator or Typhoon 2 are significant; the others probably should be.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 11:47, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, X-Terminator has been removed and Typhoon 2 won its own series which I never watched.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 11:49, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What defines a "significant" contestant robot?
Talk:HVA

message: I think this should be a disambiguation page instead of redirecting to Stasi; HVA can have more than one meaning. HVA in Acronym Finder, HVA on Dictionary.com 
EncyclopediaSalesman 14:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On "http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handelsvereniging_Amsterdam", there is already an article about the Handelsvereniging Amsterdam. Nevertheless, the name appears in red, instead of blue.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.83.150.53 (talk) 20:37, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  name in red has to be in blue
Talk:Thomas Warner (explorer)

message: I moved this here from the article:
Could someone verify that my ancestor, Sir Thomas Warner, did in fact introduce slavery? He died in 1649, and I read in answers.com that slaves in the Caribbean were first introduced in Nevis in 1649? What is the truth please?
Mark Ashton Warner, markruthwarner@yahoo,co.uk
--BeSherman (talk) 12:28, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Anti-Serb sentiment

message: It is actually a biased source too but that is okay. There are always biased sources or sources from the ethnicities or nations involved that tell their side of the story only. That is okay. Even then, nowhere in the source provided does it list 400 thousand expelled. 2600:1009:B01C:6320:B19B:B131:3DD0:5EFF (talk) 03:26, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: 400 thousand expelled? Show me your proof. Lokalni Hrvat (talk) 22:37, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased source
Talk:Tsuki

message: They seem out of place and underdeveloped compared to the article on the kendo thrust. -Toptomcat 05:00, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They are underdeveloped, but not out of place.  In every Japanese martial art other than kendo, the term tsuki is used alone or in a compound word to refer to a type of punch. Bradford44 17:35, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why are the punches here?

message: The Japanese version of this article is named Seiken-tsuki, but that term is not mentioned anywhere here.67.163.2.212 (talk) 01:11, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  正拳突き
Wikipedia talk:Dead external links/404/m

message: What is the significance of 404/m? Mathiastck 14:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

message: The reported 404 link has now been corrected but I am prevented from striking out the entry in this list by a spam filter.... Ian Cairns (talk) 12:12, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the strike-out.Quebec99 (talk) 20:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Michael Murphy (VC)]]
Talk:Bridge (grappling)

message: Hi, I would like to nominate both this, and Bridge (exercise) to be merged into one article, based on the Bridge. Currently, this is two short stubs on a very similar concept, and information could easily be merged between the two articles, in an article simply titled Bridge (Position). Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:52, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose on the grounds that while the articles are short, the contexts are sufficiently that a merge would be confusing or awkward. The articles are well-linked, and so reader won't miss information they're looking for. Klbrain (talk) 06:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

text: Oppose. While the topics of the two articles are related, they still deal with two fundamentally different things. One is a gymnastics or strength training exercise, while the other is a martial arts movement. Indeed, the exercise can build strength to perform the martial arts move, and probably vice versa, but they are still two fundamentally different things. For example, merging the Punch (combat) and Push-up articles would be ridiculous, and while these two articles are very light in content, it doesn't justify merging them, as talking about these two things as one would be extremely confusing. --VladVP (talk) 12:56, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Levi Yitzchak Horowitz

message: What's with "Wife1", "Issue1", ...? Should probably be "First Wife", "Children from first wife", something like that. Mkop (talk) 16:07, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Issue1" has been changed. See discussion at Template talk:Infobox rebbe (where this discussion belongs). -- -- -- 20:54, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stuff in Box on the side 
Talk:David Rockefeller Jr.

message: should i add one here, that meets wp:v, of course? 87.116.161.138 (talk) 17:42, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not aware of any such policy. It's better to add significant criticisms to the body of the article rather than creating a separate section. Due to the amount of vandalism this article receives, and since this comes under WP:BLP, such additions should meet the highest standards of sourcing.   Will Beback  talk   18:16, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  every bio should have a 'critique' section
Talk:Elisha Qimron

message: I don't understand what the intended meaning is, in the sentence that begins: "In 1979, Qimron was co-opted by John Strugnell..."
I don't suppose its meaning will be clear to any other reader who like me, has no previous familiarity with this topic. (Came to this Wikipedia article while following some remarks in today's New York Times.) 
Can someone re-word this to make the intended meaning clear? Thanks. Publius3 (talk) 17:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Co-opted? 
Talk:Maximilian Grabner

message: There is a separate article in German on the Schutzhaftlager here: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schutzhaftlager. Someone might like to add it in the article as a reference. The one cited is not very good.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.72.23.182 (talk) 02:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Runway incursion

message: There's a lot of undigested material in here, some of it possibly (the doctoral thesis matter?) copyviols. I don't have time (I'm on break here), but somebody needs to tighten and clean this considerably.--Orange Mike 15:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed 

message: The two links to videos in this line are broken. Youtube states that the videos have been removed by the user.
 
This methodology was investigated by the FAA FAA Pulselite Video A video example of the system in use in the manner of Qantas Airlines can be found here Runway Incursion
--149.171.232.54 (talk) 03:31, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Links 

message: A collision or near-collision on a runway due to ATC error is NOT runway incursion. This is ATC error. Runway incursion explicitly requires that something is not authorized to be on the runway. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 17:55, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Runway incursion does not equal ATC error 

message: Looks like a useful paper: "A systematic review of pilot-related runway incursions from a human factors perspective". Yan, Boufous & Molesworth (2023):  205.239.40.3 (talk) 11:12, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yan, Boufous & Molesworth (2023)
Talk:Asia-Pacific Nazarene Theological Seminary

message: (from Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_directory)
This in an official policy. 
Wikipedia is not a directory of everything that exists or has existed. Wikipedia articles are not:
#  Directories, directory entries, electronic program guide, or a resource for conducting business. For example, an article on a radio station generally should not list upcoming events, current promotions, phone numbers, current schedules, etc., although mention of major events, promotions or historically significant programme lists and schedules may be acceptable. Furthermore, the Talk pages associated with an article are for talking about the article, not for conducting the business of the topic of the article.  Wikipedia is not the yellow pages . Aepoutre 15:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contact info removal

message: Please review this article as I have recently:
1. Updated references for the article
2. Edited for style
Please indicate areas that are "directory"-like, so that the quality can be improved and rating updated.
Thanks
Steve
Smjwalsh 17:04, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, no problem. History, faculty and staff, and external links are all too long, undoubtedly contain unwanted or irrelevant information, are perhaps redundant, and mean nothing without a real reflist. Regardless of citation or length, there is nothing encyclopedic about a list of faculty and staff. Thanks for all your contributions, Steve. One thing I'd certainly recommend is not to just add weblinks, but to use the ref tags, and name those links within the ref tag. I can help you with all of this if you don't know how to make references, a reflist, etc. While I haven't read all of it, be careful that editing for style means encyclopedic and NPOV wording, not editorial statements. I would've done much of this myself (I tend to edit and Wikify a lot of Nazarene articles myself), but the sheer insanity of its current nature rather overwhelms me. Thanks so much for doing this! Aepoutre 15:17, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Ah, should probably follow-up with this. Essentially, it all needs to be brought in-line with WP:UNIGUIDE along with some other fixes. --Aepoutre (talk) 14:31, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review of this Article 
Talk:Bar Wizards

message: Please...someone...sort this article out. I'll do it in a couple of weeks if not done earlier --Markeandrews 15:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to do something with this article, but its my first attempt at anything on wikipedia, so feel free to make sweeping changes. I don't know how to sort categories out yet, but when I learn I might put some in this article. I wasn't sure if you can link to Youtube videos but I did anyway. Original username93 19:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a great start to the article, I'm fairly new also. I believe that you can't link to youtube videos. I'll do a bit of work to the article in a day or 2. --Markeandrews 15:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have made changes to the article to make it more NPOV and add links. Citations are really needed in some of the article, so if no-one else adds them I will try to find some. I noticed someone restored the youtube link but I couldn't find anything to tell whether it was allowed or not.Original username93 18:53, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes...
Template talk:History of Cambodia

message: There seem to be a lot of edits to this page with no discussion on talk. I just reverted an image change and the removal of UNAMIC from the history list - I'm working on that article. In the future, please discuss changes here. Paxse 15:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

message: How does the Mayaguez incident and the Phnom Penh rioting of 2003 gain more notability than some periods of Cambodian history? I do not see how they are particularly important, they may have been highly publicized events but they were not highly pivotal events that changed the course of Cambodian history. And I feel like they should be excluded from the template for that reason. They received a lot of Western media coverage, obviously for the Mayaguez incident, it involved Americans. But there have been much more important events that shaped Cambodia, such as the bloody election events during 1997, which were more 'pivotal' than the 2003 riot. In the meanwhile, articles concerning the Longvek, Oudong, and Chatomukh (Phnom Penh) eras should be created and linked to, however there is very scarce English information on these periods. As you can see, for the periods during teh 1400 to the 1800s, there is only one article, the dark ages of Cambodia. 
And that picture of Angkor Wat gives me a sense of tourism more than anything. How about a more historical image or try reverting it back to the Cambodian flag like most other national history templates.  --Dara 16:17, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Events 

message: There is no exactly founding date of Funan, so we should write ss C. E. 1st century. 96.229.179.106 (talk) 07:08, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Funan
Talk:Badachu

message: Photos need to be selected from http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%8C%97%E4%BA%AC%E5%B8%82%E5%85%AB%E5%A4%A7%E5%A4%84%E5%85%AC%E5%9B%AD . Badagnani 00:31, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I found some photos on Flickr with acceptable copyright status.  You can add more pictures if you want.--Danaman5 17:47, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: I've been there, and locals pronounce the name Bādàchù, not Bādàchǔ. Chu 處 can be fourth tone, so it's not completely surprising. 98.115.255.240 (talk) 20:23, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:GNOME Panel

message: nice shot of GNOME Desktop there! Praka123 15:44, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  nice shot 

message: I'm going to mark this as a stub, since I think the information about GNOME-panel is rather slim — it's mostly generic information than particulars about gnome-panel. I am in particular missing background information about gnome-panel, like when was the first version written (and much has changed from the first version to the current), why did the GNOME developers decide it was a good idea to have it in the first place and how important is it considered to be.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.167.145.223 (talk) 06:51, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub 

message: How does one get back the Bottom Panel when it is accidentally deleted?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.106.42.84 (talk) 02:22, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion pages aren't for software support... but right-click the other panel, and select 'New Panel'.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.24.112.10 (talk) 14:05, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bottom Panel Restoring 

message: Hi. Maybe it could be interesting add a section named Future of Gnome Panel (which is uncertain) and also clarify that at least in Ubuntu you must log in using gnome classic with either effectrs or without. It's just a suggestion. What do you think about? Sorry for my English.--PaliGol (talk) 14:17, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gnome classic, future of gnome panel? 

message: GNOME Fallback already redirects here. Fallback development has resumed under the name Flashback so perhaps the term GNOME Flashback should also redirect here. -- Charlesb95 (talk) 10:52, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done -- Charlesb95 (talk) 12:23, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirect
Talk:CommerceNet

message: Much of the language used in this article, which seems mostly to have been added by user:203.211.151.251, seems to be a bit overboard. I would edit, but I can't really tell what CommerceNet does... seems to have some elements of a venture capitalist firm, but I don't know if that's the case. -Duplico 15:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Language
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/First World Problems

message: this is a fascinating conundrum in the modern world and wikipedia desperately needs to stay on top of stuff like this to stay relevant.
also, ironically, having your wikipedia article marked for deletion is perhaps the ultimate FWP. as a mark of wikipedia's hipness (hipsters love irony!) perhaps the article could be left in this state indefinitely?
Ironically, I found THIS site which explains your little "joke" and is attacking fellow editors.  Wildthing61476 20:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Our problem, unsurprisingly enough, is that this article violates Wikipedia policy and guidelines, since this is neither an advocacy forum, a blog, a free webhost or a public affairs website.  It is nothing more than a straw man argument to presume that one can only assert the encyclopedia's criteria for entry out of sinister motives, and it borders on farce to infer that deleting this article will materially affect the misery of the world's poor.    Ravenswing  23:39, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  No....but I did stay at a Holiday Inn last night...Wildthing61476 00:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Moroccan hip hop

message: Elgrandetoto Young loun (talk) 19:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elgrandetoto
Talk:The Chronicles of Ramlar

message: I cleaned up this page a little and added the cover.  However a lot of the wording seems POV, and should be either changed or sourced.
--Wynler | Talk 16:07, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording and Sources
Talk:Avalon Drive

message: this article needs to be wikified severly , it also lack NPOV  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.217.74.200 (talk) 10:23, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [untitled]
Talk:Markham (federal electoral district)

message: I've noticed all 3 members of provincial parliament since 1995 (2 Chinese, one Japanese) as well as some of the challengers have been Asian (mostly East-Asian but one Pakistani). Is this a reflection of the ethnic makeup of the population? If so, would be interesting to include in the article. Nil Einne 16:10, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnic makeup