lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Lemon Jelly albums

message: Discussion moved here from Wikipedia:Categories for deletion. There was no overwhelming consensus to delete so it has been kept. RedWolf 22:39, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)
The band have only released 2 albums (with a new one due out this month); do we really need a category for so few? There are currently no articles in it (there was one, but I inadvertantly lost the category earlier during a merge). I'm actually not sure what the policy is for creating categories for albums, so my apologies if I'm wrong in this case. David Johnson [T|C] 00:16, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah your wrong here unfortunately. Policy seems to be keep ARTIST NAME HERE albums even when there will only ever be 1 entry like :Category:4 Non Blondes albums  ALKIVAR™ 00:47, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to be?  Is it written somewhere?  Perhaps someone could provide the page.  If that is the policy, it should surely be reviewed.  A category that will only have one entry in it ever is a bit pointless. Worldtraveller 19:53, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: See Category talk:4 Non Blondes albums. -Aranel ("Sarah") 00:58, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, OK. I'll add a note to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums#Categories. David Johnson [T|C] 11:29, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

text: May be worth noting that whereas 4 Non-Blondes no longer exist as a group, Lemon Jelly do, and will (hopefully) be putting out several more albums (I'm looking forward to the new one!).  Grutness|hello?  05:49, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia:Categories for deletion
Talk:Princess Irina Alexandrovna of Russia

message: Should this article not be titled Irina Romanova.  She was not an "Imperial Highness" merely a "Serene Highness". Since by Romanov legislation she was not a Grand Duchess "of Russia". In imperial Russia she was considered and titled as the daughter of a grand-son of a Tsar.  Her brothers were all Prince (Christian name) Romanov. The fact through her mother she was a grand-daughter of Alexander III was legally discounted, at her wedding, at the Anitchkov Palace she did not wear the Romanov bridal regalia which symbolized a Grand Duchess/Princess "of Russia" and in her youth before becoming Princess Yusupov was always titled Princess Irina Romanova.  Finally had she considered herself "of Russia" she would not have allowed herself, following her marriage, to be styled "Princess Yusupov" as the "of Russia" would have taken precedence over her husband's title. If there is no objection to this I will move the page in 14 days from now to Irina, Princess Romanov leaving this page as a redirect. There probably needs to be a redirect from Princess Yusupov too. 81.131.159.87 22:52, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember reading "Lost Splendor" where it mentioned that she must signed off all her legitimate claim to the throne if she is to marry outside the noble family. So I guess that's why. 
Also don't you think this article talkes too much about other people instead of her? Why is GD Tatiana's picture even up there?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.126.75.181 (talk) 06:40, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Irina didn't write a lot herself. Other people wrote about her and she's most historically significant for her marriage to Yussupov and involvement in the murder of Rasputin. That's why I included the descriptions of Yussupov in her biography, because it helped explain the story and Irina's own reactions in the section with the letter exchanges between her and Yussupov. --Bookworm857158367 12:02, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Sodium chlorate

message: Surely the structure should not include a face (oval shape with two eyes) should it?--MilesTerrex (talk) 01:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure diagram- i think this is a joke 

message: I think this is the correct structure.--MilesTerrex So the face should be deleted. (talk) 01:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The structure displayed in this article is correct. Also, I fail to see a face of any kind. --Cubbi (talk) 03:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You dont see the alien face above the Chlorine atom? It still there--MilesTerrex (talk) 12:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: All I see is a Lone pair. --Cubbi (talk) 14:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh I see. im not a chemist (can you tell?) I thought someone was having a joke (sorry).
--MilesTerrex (talk) 16:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The correct structure 

message: Moved the paragraph on toxicity (presumably in humans) to its own section, but I don't understand a word of what it says. Can an actual biochemist look at it and figure out a more accessible way to say the same? 85.178.115.49 (talk) 16:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's classified as harmful, and the first MSDS I found states:Strong oxidizing agent and slightly toxic by ingestion. Ssscienccce (talk) 18:28, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  paragraph on toxicity 

message: I think the bit in the article where it says that the sale and use of the stuff in EU countries is banned is actually downright wrong. It can be bought online from several lab suppliers (http://www.stratlab.co.uk/stratlab/value/itemdesc.asp?ic=S2182/R4 is an example) and I don't think you need special permission to use it. --217.42.48.112 (talk) 11:16, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ban of sale in EU 

message: I understand that the "same reactants" can yield different results: ethanol + sulfuric acid = {ethylene, diethyl ether} depending on temperature. But the entries for sodium hypochlorite sodium chlorate and sodium perchlorate all pretty much say that they're created the same way. Can someone knowledgeable on this topic put in the differentiating conditions?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.32.223.91 (talk) 02:13, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production: electrolysis? 

message: I believe it is worthy to note things about the chiral crystal of this compound, as well as experiments about it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.219.21.69 (talk) 15:34, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chirality 

message: I made this edit based on Hess' law. If all the heat went into the product, the NaCl would be about a thousand K hotter than before based on its heat capacity.
I am aware that this is often a thermal decomposition, but it seems self-sustaining. Ideally, I'd like this made more explicit in both articles.--Jasper Deng (talk) 09:48, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decomposition
Talk:Rainy River (Minnesota–Ontario)

message: The French translation cannot be correct, since it is the translation of Rainy Lake, not Rainy River. -- Decumanus 23:14, 2005 Jan 14 (UTC)
Yeah I noticed that just now.  It is probably because Rainy Lake (the source of the Rainy River) used to just forward to this.  I am in the process of updating both and I think that there are maps available from the IJC (international controlling body for conservation and use of the entire boundary waters area). --Rtrev 04:25, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I rated the article as Stub class and Mid importance.  Stub class matches the stub tags on the article, although with some expansion and formatting I think it can reach Start class.  The Mid importance rating is because the river forms a significant part of an international boundary.  PKT (talk) 14:06, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm back, 13 1/2 years later, to raise the quality rating to class=start  :)  PKT(alk) 17:40, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 
Talk:Sydney Harbour Tunnel

message: This article could list some more fact about the tunnel:  How many lanes of traffic, the diameter of the tubes for example.
Also, is anyone from the area familiar with this Transfield Pty Ltd?  I searched for Transfield on Wikipedia, and the only article I found was for Transfield Services Limited.  Are these the same company?  If so, lets fix the link.CharacterZero 19:55, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: When I was down at the Port Kembla site where the precast tunnels were built it was always called a "Casting Basin" . It was never referred to as  a "Dry Dock". Dry docks are permanent structures used in shipbuilding and repair. A casting basin is basically a large hole dug into the ground, there is no caisson, a earth bund wall seperates the sea from the work site.
There are plenty of online engineering references to casting basins, a Google Scholar search reveals at least 4 or 5 references to the "Port Kembla Casting Basin" while a online NSW Parliment Hansard Search reveals 5 offical refereneces . The Port Kembla Casting Basin has also been referred to in secondary sources such as published by the large EPC concern Fluor . Surfing bird (talk) 02:51, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps it is worth starting a dedicated casting basin article? Wongm (talk) 04:05, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dry Dock

message: Users of the SHT or SHB must pay with electronic tolling systems. The tunnel has been cashless for longer than the bridge. The only toll roads in Sydney that still accept cash is the M2 (after the M4 toll booths were removed earlier this year) and the Eastern Distributor.203.56.127.1 (talk) 21:21, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Already cashless 

message: What is the length of this tunnel?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.26.123.208 (talk) 09:22, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length 

message: Maybe the only current ...
But it's the third, at least.
Balmain to Greenwich
Balmain coal to Cremorne Dave Rave (talk) 10:58, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The only ? 
Talk:Duchess of Malfi

message: Why is this on Speedy deletion?  It's coherent, sensible, informative and should be merged with the other article instead of being outright deleted.--Pharos 23:38, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I happened to come across the duplication while browsing and proposed a merge. I don't have a passion either way. But I'd note (a) The Singing Badger's summary claims "reads like plagiarism, doesn't have much unique info, contains several inaccuracies" and (b) this article is mostly about Webster's career at the time and barely about the play. If anything, the information should be merged into John Webster. David Brooks 01:58, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)

text: I'm confused. Did you intend to restore the  tag now so that an administrator can see it? (and isn't that being replaced by a category mechanism?) David Brooks 08:35, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Rebecca de Alba

message: I pretty much can't understand a word of the Ricky Martin section. -- AvatarMN (talk) 18:03, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost in translation 
Category talk:Education in the United Kingdom

message: Can anyone suggest a good category for individuals involved with educational policy (e.g. Education ministers but also other prominent people like Chris Woodhead)? Timrollpickering 00:35, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)

message: I have moved several pages to these sub categories.  There are a few more I would suggest moving. Davidkinnen 16:04, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Education in England and Education and Scotland
Talk:Ağrı Province

message: ==Untitled==
Is the Aznavur tepe related to Charles Aznavour? denizTC 19:23, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I never thought about that before, but it's probably just a coincidence. :) -- Aivazovsky 15:28, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Does Aznavour have a meaning? denizTC 17:03, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure but I know that it's short for Aznavourian. -- Aivazovsky 18:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My guess is that Aznavour may come from the Armenian word Azniv (Ազնիւ) that means something in the likes of respectful, kind. - Fedayee 21:19, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Is the Aznavur tepe related to Charles Aznavour? denizTC 19:23, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I never thought about that before, but it's probably just a coincidence. :) -- Aivazovsky 15:28, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Does Aznavour have a meaning? denizTC 17:03, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure but I know that it's short for Aznavourian. -- Aivazovsky 18:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My guess is that Aznavour may come from the Armenian word Azniv (Ազնիւ) that means something in the likes of respectful, kind. - Fedayee 21:19, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "The first Turkish presence in the region was the brief occupation of the Doğubeyazıt area by the Saka in 680."
This sentence is confusing, as it lacks the information on how this postulated Turkish presence is related to the presence of the Saka. Truchses (talk) 13:17, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saka turkic? 

message: This article is related with a province (Ağrı Province) not with a city (Ağrı). So we mustn't add alternative names of the city of Ağrı. We can add alternative names of the province of Ağrı with reliable sources. Takabeg (talk) 06:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative names

message: The kurdish name of Ağri is Agirî. Avestaboy (talk) 10:54, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kurdish name of Ağri 

message: Can you just not move the section? You deleting sourced content for your own pov point.Shadow4dark (talk) 12:10, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pov pushing
Talk:Chrono Cross

message: Has everything above been addressed?  Concerned about excessive amount of quoted text (should be paraphrased in our own words to a greater extent).   are you able to add any assessment for URFA?  SandyGeorgia (Talk)  18:05, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: No response, adding to WP:FARGIVEN. SandyGeorgia (Talk)  03:24, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:URFA/2020]] 

message: This statement in the first line of the "Development" category:
"Square began planning Chrono Cross immediately after the release of Xenogears in 1998 (which itself was originally conceived as a sequel to the SNES game)"
may be contradicted by Xenogears' own article, which states at different points that Xenogears was originally conceived as the seventh Final Fantasy game or as a Chrono Trigger sequel. The link to the first assertion in the Xenogears article is to an article that no longer exists, while the link to the second assertion is in Japanese with no English translation.
Meanwhile, the closest link in the Chrono Cross article is at the end of the next sentence, which links an interview with Masato Kato in which he states about developing the idea for Chrono Cross that "It was right about the time we finished making "Xenogears". This seems to refute the idea of Xenogears as a potential sequel to Chrono Trigger.
I'm doing a little research for an article here, and just looking to clarify this, when I run into three different perspectives on the issue with all sorts of sourcing issues, so I just wanted to bring those issues to someone's attention. I didn't edit because I don't know which version of events is true (although considering we're dealing with Chrono, at least "contradictory versions of reality" is thematically consistent!)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.125.162.56 (talk) 17:50, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've read into all of this in the past, and I believe that I found both claims to be true. I think the very earliest planning stages were very fluid, and at points, very very early ideas for Xenogears were considered for entries of Final Fantasy and Chrono games. I think they eventually felt that they thematically didn't fit into either series, and made it into its own thing, Xenogears, instead. Sergecross73 msg me 17:57, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xenogears originating as a sequel to Chrono Trigger 

message: *Backstab #24https://archive.org/details/backstab-magazine-french-24/page/n91/mode/2up
207.229.139.154 (talk) 05:17, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews
Talk:Athletics at the 2004 Summer Olympics – Women's triple jump

message: What's with the stereo repetition of the numbers in the Qualifications section?  Gene Nygaard 02:27, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't anybody pay any attention at all?  Why was this still here more than 14 months later? We might as well just throw them out, nominate the whole batch for deletion. Gene Nygaard 19:13, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Closet play

message: This is by its very nature a subsection. The reason you know it is a floating subsection, is that it can't be understood except in terms of Theater or Drama or wherever it may most usefully belong. It is not a stub. "Closet drama" is the common term. That may be why "Closet play" is the Wikipedia title. --Wetman 02:34, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Venera 13 and 14

message: what are melanocratic alkaline gabbroids?--Nowa 21:56, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've partially wikified that, for the description of "melanocratic" see here:  . Cmapm 01:02, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Akaline grabbroids

message: From the edit history:
01:11, 8 November 2005 Cmapm (→Image restoration - why "restore"? Mitchell call this "processing")
*Fair enough. I was using "restoration" in the sense of producing a better-quality version from the original materials. After all, isn't that what movie restorers do? But I'm not going to quibble over specific descriptions. The science is more important. And the pretty pictures, of course.Lee M 18:58, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit history

message: I hazily remember from something I read in the 80's that these Venera probes vented the last of their onboard fuel through radiators to super chill the landers to help them survive the surface temperature.
:I can't quickly find now, how did they achieve this, but e.g. "Venera-13" charged lander's  accumulators and at the same time, indeed, chilled instrument container to -10 degrees C, creating a "reserve of the cold". Cmapm 14:07, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-landing cooling 

message: I've created separate pages for Venera 13 and 14, but left this one as is, because the probes are related.Ricnun 13:26, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate pages 

message: it seems like a good idea to merge these pages, since the articles right now are essentially copies of each other. unless someone thinks they were sufficiently different to have separate pages, i would suggest merging them back into one. 82.6.96.66 (talk) 00:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merging
Talk:Fame (2003 TV series)

message: The reason I left this in the 2003 TV wiki is because Fame had several other TV incarnations - a fictional drama in the 80's and a short-lived revival (Fame LA) in 1999 or 2000. Are all these shows supposed to go in only 1 category? --JamesB3 02:54, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Giganotosaurus

message: The book cited as evidence of the 'JY-gah-NOH-toh-SORE-us' pronunciation actually proposes the pronunciation 'GIG-'. Is this sufficient to edit the IPA pronunciation section to 'GIG-'? EtheyB (talk) 09:38, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to change it accordingly. FunkMonk (talk) 20:09, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Can someone correct the pronunciation for Giganotosaurus?  I would do it but only people with Wikipedia accounts can edit this page.  I will add that mispronouncing Giganotosaurus is quite widespread and it would be good if Wikipedia didn't encourage it.  Everything Dinosaur actually made a video where they touched on the correct pronunciation of Giganotosaurus with input from the SVP, at 3:32 here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gw79A7Fqr4 2A02:C7C:649E:3600:A8FC:2BE4:D0F9:C010 (talk) 15:14, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Asking again in case it was missed due to my correction yesterday.  Can someone please correct the pronunciation of Giganotosaurus please? 2.223.234.63 (talk) 15:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This has now been corrected as per my initial comment. EtheyB (talk) 14:17, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: Giganotosaurus carolinii is dated ranging from "Age range of interval:99.60000 - 89.80000 m.y. ago"
https://paleobiodb.org/classic/displayCollResults?a=basicCollectionSearch&collection_no=67296
and "Age range of interval:99.60000 - 93.50000 m.y. ago"
https://paleobiodb.org/classic/displayCollResults?a=basicCollectionSearch&collection_no=51944 2601:280:4E80:3550:2842:A510:9D12:B683 (talk) 05:08, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time period 

message: suggested note at top alongside 'Not to be confused with Gigantosaurus.' 'For tv series, see Gigantosaurus_(TV_series)' 86.144.185.105 (talk) 15:28, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? Everything named after a particular animal doesn't need to be listed under said animal's "not to be confused with". FunkMonk (talk) 16:31, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  tv series 

message: for the sake of accuracy  69.124.7.129 (talk) 05:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a single section about that, which is already titled appropriately. The thing is, most papers about this taxon are just about that, its size. Very little has been published about its anatomy or behaviour, and articles can only reflect what has actually been published. FunkMonk (talk) 08:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposition to change article name to "endless discussion about if this dinosaur is bigger than t. rex"
Talk:Sukhoi Su-47

message: this changed from parachute to ecm. Perhaps a user that is an "ECM-friend"? Anidaat (talk) 08:41, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  parachute to ecm? in one edit 

message: It appears that the internet, being the internet, has found the Su-47's current location. In google maps, inputting the global coordinates of "55.5709275 38.1457747" in Google maps results in location of what appears to be a scrapheap within the Zhukovsky international airport, where the distinct swept forwards wings show that, in fact, it is the Su-47. I know not why it would be within a scrap heap, but this does, at the very least, raise questions of the current status of the aircraft. It does appear to have been stripped of paint, so it seems it may be being scrapped. Someone should look into this. 74.114.86.60 (talk) 21:10, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of Su-47 

message: According to this source, Military Turbojet/Turbofan Specifications (jet-engine.net), D-30F11 generates considerably less thrust than D-30F6. I edited the Article today to correct it, as it says the Su-47 uses D-30F6, which it does not. If anyone can find other sources that point to the thrust of D-30F11 it would be great.Sqrt(-1)magsqrt(-1)nary (talk) 03:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  D-30F11 Thrust?
Talk:CIVT-DT

message: The launch day for CIVT (or VTV as referred to on-air at the time) was not on September 22, 1997. That was a Monday. I suppose that was their first "broadcast day" beginning at 6:00am with their morning news programming. The actual launch day was on September 19, 1997 which was a Friday. To be precise: The station launched on Friday, September 19, 1997 at 5:55pm. [] I can not recall the airings on September 17th that this website writes. Moonlightfocus (talk) 09:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Launch Day
Talk:Ford CVH engine

message: The issues relating to the 1.4 version of this engine appear to refer specifically to carburettor editions. Was there a fuel injected edition, and would this have solved some of the problems such as those of power deficiencies resulting from the  original lean-burn carburettor and low vacuum pressure on an engine with worn parts ?
--Minotaur500 00:40, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was there a Fuel Injected CVH 1.4 ? 

message: The hardening of valve stem seals is a common problem across many engine types and the tools to replace valve stem seals without removing the head gasket (spark plug to air compressor, or feeding a rope into the cylinder) are standard mechanic procedures and not of significance to this engine type.  Accordingly I have removed this section.  50.206.120.10 (talk) Bruce Peterson  —Preceding undated comment added 21:32, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valve stem seals