Talk:Assyriska FF

message: I disagree with this edit and comment.
"Youth tournaments are not notable enough to be included" ?
This is not some local inimportant tournament. That's world club championship (under 11). 
This is big achievement of this club. 
If we continue to delete such sections, we'll end in deleting the article about FIFA's and UEFA's championships U21, U17 etc... Kamarad Walter (talk) 12:31, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You can't seriously compare a youth club tournament (no, the Gothia Cup is not a world club championship, although it is the largest youth tournament in the world) win for eleven year olds, with the World Championships for U-17 national teams. Check any other club article on Wikipedia, for example the ones that are featured articles, listed here, and you'll notice that none of them includes U-11 tournament wins. For example, the article IFK Göteborg does not include that club's three wins in Gothia Cup, the latest in 2006 in the U-16 class. And either way, the article, as all other football club articles, is about the senior team, not about the youth teams (which are not notable enough for Wikipedia). – Elisson • T • C • 12:43, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have a clear answer for this, but I think you guys should take it to WikiProject Football and see what they say. Chaldean (talk) 17:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think it is pretty clear by just looking at the honours/achievements sections of all the club articles WP:WPF have promoted to featured status, that under-11 victories, or any youth team victories whatsoever are not generally notable enough to be included. – Elisson • T • C • 22:54, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: I don't think it's a good section at all. Why should we have a section listing all former players? Shmayo (talk) 17:54, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. A better idea would be to rename the section "Notable players" and decide on a certain criteria like players who have played a certain amount of matches for the club, 100, 200, 500 and etc. However, the common thing to do is to create seperate lists for players with at least 100 matches played for the club, see List of Malmö FF players for example, and leave a smaller list with tighter criteria on the main article. The list in it's current form exists without criteria and listing all former players would be overkill to feature on the main article of the club, that's more fitting for a category, see Category:Assyriska Föreningen players. --Reckless182 (talk) 18:10, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, a new section for nobable players instead could be good. I'm not sure if creating a new article is nessercery, Malmö FF is a much older club, not sure if there are many in Assyriska's history that've played more than 100 matches. Shmayo (talk) 17:51, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Former players"-section 

message: Why did they remove Assyriskas logo? --Suryoye85 (talk) 14:42, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Assyriska FF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081206152827/http://www.gais.se:80/Fotboll/gais.nsf/StatisticsByTeam?ReadForm&Lag=Assyriska%20FF to http://www.gais.se/fotboll/GAIS.nsf/StatisticsByTeam?ReadForm&Lag=Assyriska%20FF
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130717203856/http://zelge.com/ to http://zelge.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:40, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified