Talk:Sufficiency economy

message: This page was moved from the Localism (Politics) page so that the topic could have it's own space.  Localism is a broad theory and the Sufficiency Theory of Thailand is specific in its details.  A link has been included from the previous page to here and past discussions on this topic can be seen there. 
There were questions of the NPOV and the references were out of whack, as they are now.
--Ryandwayne 20:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: Did anybody else find this citation a little weak?  According to a leaked top secret telegraph from the US Ambassador in Thailand to the US Secretary of State, the tenets of Sufficiency Economy are "vague and malleable" and its popularity stems from “public reluctance to criticize anything associated with the revered King.”[1]
Domain: http://thaicables.wordpress.com/2011/07/13/06bangkok5706-what-is-the-sufficiency-economy/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quash-asia (talk • contribs) 07:09, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaked Cables 

message: Vandalists keep deleting criticism section. They argue the article is POV. To make it NPOV: NOT to delete the criticism, but to write counter-argument. What they are doing is only to blank good argument.
... Is this your first time in wiki or something? Unless you have the reputable source for criticism, you don't add in anything that's POV. Wikipedia is not a public forum for debate and discussion (that's for *gasp* talk and discussion* page). Suredeath (talk) 03:19, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: The Economist was running heavy hit pieces on Thailand via Economist employee Sam Moon running PR for Thaksin Shinwatra after the 2006 coup. The Economist is also a member of the Chatham House, an elitist combine of globalist corporations with vested interests in opening up Thailand's markets to globalism, thus are heavily critical of Thailand's "localism." Chatham House member Amsterdam & Peroff is also defending both Thaksin Shinwatra, and his political party's United Front for Democracy Against Dictatorship. The Economist article is an editorial, not a factual report and cannot be used as an impartial, objective source.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.8.238.38 (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased Source 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Sufficiency economy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070908174617/http://www.msnbc.msn.com:80/id/16609279/site/newsweek/ to http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16609279/site/newsweek/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:48, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sufficiency economy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719090603/http://www.nesdb.go.th/Md/book/booksuffwork_eng.pdf to http://www.nesdb.go.th/Md/book/booksuffwork_eng.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:45, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified