Talk:Notting Hill (film)

message: "The film was well received by critics, and became the highest grossing British film released." The highest grossing British film released when? Of all time? That year? Opening weekend? It really needs some clarification, and a source at that. --Joker1189 (talk) 15:27, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification of the Lead

message: Does anybody know where the actual bookshop used for the film is based, if indeed it existed at all?
--Supergussy 21:39, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The following is noted on IMDb.com, but seem to contradict each other (and are not sourced):
*Thacker's bookshop is actually an antiques shop in real life, next to a butcher. One or two doors down from the butchers is an office for Richard Curtis' production company.
*The real Travel Bookshop had a sign in its window saying "We're almost famous." It would sell non-travel books when it fitted in with a theme. For example, selling Martin Amis' London Fields when doing a Notting Hill theme. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TAnthony (talk • contribs) 22:54, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of Shop 

message: Does anyone know of how much money the film made at the box office? Could someone please find out? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.0.69.6 (talk • contribs)  5 September 2006
:IMDB.com says $116 million, I'll add that in ... TAnthony 23:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Profit

message: The really long quotes in the text are hard to follow, so I set off the one in "Filming" with cquote. The others at the end of "Casting" and "Filming" are borderline. This seems fairly complete according to WP:MOSFILMS. I'm not really sure what "losing out to Star Wars" means in the "Box office" section. The lead sentence says that it won a BAFTA, "and both won and was nominated for several others." This is unclear, as it implies it was nominated for a other BAFTAs and won a few. Likewise "...the request was declined due to huge problems that fans attending a Leonardo DiCaprio premiere had caused the police." What problems? When? Why is this related? Assuming these issues will get fixed, seems GA quality to me. Gimmetrow 01:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made all of the fixes you have suggested, aside from the other quotes, which I think are fine. Thanks for the review! Gran2 05:38, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Looks good. On the "fake premiere" sentence, how about: "Police had found the fans at a recent Leonardo DiCaprio premiere problematic, and the police were concerned the same problems might occur at the staged premiere." Gimmetrow 14:12, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's better, so I've implemented it. Gran2 14:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA

message: The article's well written, but gives away too much of the film's detail. Even though this film is not that recent (1999), I think there'd still be people wanting to see the film who're just looking to this article for some info.
I personally would take out some of the parts of the article that gives away the ending.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.146.96.176 (talk) 23:07, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I'm sorry but if you don't want spoilers, then don't read the plot section. Gran2 07:44, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too Much Detail 

message: To show the passing of a year's time, William is seen walking past outdoor markets, with the weather changing every few yards. In "winter", it not only is "snowing", but the street is covered in white. I've never been to London, but I know it is very unusual for it to get accumulating snow. I've seen pictures of large date palms growing in London. 207.210.134.83 (talk) 17:37, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Walking through the seasons" 

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Lampman (talk) 02:21, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps

message: I'm not sure the comment on house prices is helpful.  Average prices rose in Notting Hill between 1999 and 2006 by roughly 100%, but this was not untypical of London as a whole.  In any event, by the time of the film's release, Notting Hill was already a relatively expensive part of London.  Indeed I can recall that one of the criticisms of the film at the time was that if Hugh Grant's character owned a house in Notting Hill and could afford to live as he did despite his bookshop being loss-making then he presumably was independently wealthy and thus the apparent gap between his circumstances and those of the film star Anna Scott was not as great as the audience was supposed to think.Oinky (talk) 12:32, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've haven't been watching this article closely enough, I didn't notice that had snuck in. I've removed because it isn't realy relevant. Gran2 14:06, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notting Hill House Prices 

message: Omid Djalili is listed as having a cameo role, however, the definition of a cameo role is "a brief appearance of a known person in a work of the performing arts" (taken from wikipedia.) At the time of the film's release he had only been on the stand up scene for a few years. This is more an example of the small roles jobbing actors play before 'hitting the big time' for example Robbie Coltrane in 'Flash Gordon' or Courtney Cox in Springsteen's 'Dancing in the Dark'95.146.6.51 (talk) 23:44, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Very true; ammended. Gran2 23:50, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Notting Hill (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070927220058/http://www.britishcomedyawards.com/pastwinners99.html to http://www.britishcomedyawards.com/pastwinners99.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:59, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Notting Hill (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928055543/http://www.dvdtown.com/reviews/notting-hill/739/2 to http://www.dvdtown.com/reviews/notting-hill/739/2
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070606202752/http://www.britishtheatreguide.info/news/library/soft/blwh-022000.htm to http://www.britishtheatreguide.info/news/library/soft/blwh-022000.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:57, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Notting Hill (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20000929002132/http://www.jsonline.com/enter/movies/reviews/may99/m.nott28052799.asp to http://www2.jsonline.com/enter/movies/reviews/may99/m.nott28052799.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:43, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The third graph reads:
: "At a restaurant the next day, Will and Anna overhear four men at a nearby table discussing her, first praising and then disparaging her and equating actresses to prostitutes. Will confronts them, then she introduces herself and calmly insults the stunned sextet."
Which is it -- four or six? -- Marcus Rugman (talk) 21:46, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot point 

message: The fourth paragraph of the "Production" section reads:
:Nicole Kidman fought to get the role of Anna Scott, but she was told that she wasn’t talented enough.
Reading the referenced article from People magazine provides the following quote:
:"...I really wanted the role that Julia Roberts played in Notting Hill. ... Yeah, I did. But I wasn't well known  enough, and I wasn't talented enough."
I don't read this, nor the article's headline of "Nicole Kidman Reveals She Wanted Julia Roberts' Role in Notting Hill: 'I Wasn't Talented Enough'", as Nicole Kidman suggesting she was told that she wasn't talented enough, more that she was providing her own rationalization/suggestion as to why she did not get the role at that stage of her career. Without the idea of being told that she wasn't talented enough, I feel like even including this part in the Wikipedia article is no longer necessary, but would love any other feedback. Thanks all. PZootie (talk) 17:55, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production section Nicole Kidman quote