lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:POWER5

message: 199.90.15.3 contested the validity of the claim that POWER4 was successful. Here is my POV. POWER4 was successful since:
* IBM was the #1 UNIX vendor during the period
* it held and kept several performance records (TPC-C, fastest supercomuter in the US)
* it spawed PowerPC 970 and POWER5
** The former saved Apple, the latter reinforced IBMs position as #1 UNIX vendor performance wise and by revenue
* it replaced 2 different architectures (RS64 and POWER3) unifying two server families (pSeries and iSeries)
* was the first commercially availabe dual core processor
* survived as several high end RISC architectures lost to x86 (PA-RISC, MIPS, Alpha). SPARC nearly died too
* was the most common supercomputer processor during the period, excluding x86 processors
POWER4 did all this while being used solely by IBM. Pretty succesful according to me.
-- Henriok 16:24, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

message: The author of this article has rescinded RealWorldTech's permission to show his article, however, he has given Hewlett-Packard permission to post his article on their site, so perhaps we should change the link?
This is the alternate url
http://h21007.www2.hp.com/dspp/files/unprotected/Itanium/sizingsuperheavys.pdf —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.25.143.64 (talk) 20:53, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sizing Up the Super Heavyweights"
Talk:Hammonds Plains, Nova Scotia

message: Should the main Hammonds Plains page be called "Upper Hammonds Plains"? Misterjerk2 16:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:St. Louis Children's Hospital

message: I just want to mention that in my observation and experience every good word about this hospital in the article is true.
All praise to the Emergency Department and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit in particular, which saved my younger son's life as a toddler when he had a systemic streptococcus infection.  Without their care his physician estimated he would have died the next day.  It's been a over a decade, and he's tall and healthy and strong as the proverbial bull.
 
I can never thank them enough.  -- Davidkevin (talk) 17:58, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can't Put It In the Article, but True Anyway 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Children`s Hospital (Saint Louis) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 15#Children`s Hospital (Saint Louis) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  1234qwer1234qwer4 15:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Children`s Hospital (Saint Louis)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Rabbit (Winnie-the-Pooh)

message: The problem with this page is the same as it is usually with articles related to Winnie-the-Pooh: it doesn't distinguish the character in Milne's book, and the one in the Disney cartoons. There is difference between the two! - Don golgi 16:42, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This has been bugging me for just about my entire life, what gender is Rabbit supposed to be?
He is certainly male, in the whole book he is referred to as "he". Also, in the cartoons, he is voiced by male actors. Actually, all major Winnie the Pooh characters are male, except for Kanga. -Don golgi 13:04, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In the cartoons, he's somewhat effeminate; in one episode he was shown with hair rollers and a pink robe. This has also led to speculation that he is gay. However in the 2011 movie he fantasizes about female rabbits. So he's just a foppish straight male rabbit. FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 00:04, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: His original voice actor (Junius Matthews) probably never managed to have a low-pitched voice which might be the main reason some of us have thought he was female. Cbsteffen (talk) 00:55, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gender? 

message: why the hell does Ken Samson redirect to Rabbit? it's pointless. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.244.187.117 (talk) 21:55, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: Masculine pronouns are used to refer to Rabbit in the Disney movies/tvshow and on Disney's official website.Mismatchedsocks (talk) 08:53, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. I do not find it uncommon for anyone to assume that Rabbit is female because his original voice actor (Junius Matthews) did not manage to have a low-pitched voice throughout puberty or adulthood. Cbsteffen (talk) 00:52, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disney's Rabbit is NOT female. 
Talk:Riley Wuz Here

message: I'm not sure what happened to this talk page but I'd like to make some changes to the end of this article.  The plot line is incorrect.  
1 - The portrait that Riley paints on Grandad's house is undeniably Grandad:
     
A - Grandad is unconvinced that Riley is the artist.  Once Riley sees that Grandad doesn't believe him (from the conversation they had in the house)Riley's sole concern seems to switch to making Grandad believe.
B - The photo album that Riley takes the reference picture from is an album that would seem to be far older than his parents wedding album would be.  The pictures are in black and white, the car with the "just married" sign is an older model car and the photos themselves are the older style with the ruffled like edges.  These all point to the reference photo being of grandads wedding as opposed to his parents.  
C - The portrait he paints itself looks like the grandad that we see in the flashbacks.  In the flashbacks before this episode, grandad is always shown wearing glasses.  In the flashbacks in the episodes after this one (Wingman) Grandad is shown without glasses multiple times.  The portrait painted looks like the grandad in the flashbacks excpet he is blushing.  
2 - Once Riley paints this portrait, he no longer references any concern for having the other people acknowledge that he is the artist.--Bigpapirick 16:43, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:SVNS

message: Not sure why Supporters website of the Manu Samoa is linked here - it is not directly relevant to this page.  Have removed this.67.69.36.201 (talk) 20:30, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: Like the new edits to my edits yesterday (Jones.liam (talk) 10:03, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice Touch 

message: Arabian Gulf don't play under the article's flag, use a White Flag with a Black Horse :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.62.147.90 (talk) 16:04, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arabian Gulf Flag
Talk:Palm IIIx

message: I've just powered up an old Palm IIIx which has been unpowered so long as to lose all memory state, and it's got OS 3.3 on it, so I'm not sure how accurate the statement that these ship with 3.1 is. Maybe they also released some later ones with 3.3 on?
Mine has 3.1. Never patched. The X has flash ROM so if yours *ever* patched to 3.3 by anyone, it can never go back, even if the power is lost 94.168.179.213 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 22:45, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Uxor

message: As a very strange and off-the-wall aside to the extensive discussion on this talk page, does anyone know why Uxor redirects here?  I was trying to get to an article on Green Man's home planet. Odd, wot? MJ the Prophet 15:48, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well--I searched "Uxor" and saw the redirect; then clicked "Redirected from Uxor" which took me to the Uxor redirect page; and then the history showed that Uxor used to be a definition of the latin term for wife; which apparently got redirected to wife; which apparently redirects to marriage.  (So does husband.)  I created a disambiguation page which links to both Green Man & marriage, with explanation, because nowhere in the marriage page does it explain the latin term "uxor".  So it's not surprising you were confused.  (copyied this thread from the marriage talk page) --lquilter 16:55, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Uxor redirect?
Talk:Crimen Ferpecto

message: I've just merged my old version of the plot with the most recent version, which is better written but deliberately avoids telling how the story ends. There is no problem about that, since the spoiler warning is there for something. Nearly all movie entries at Wikipedia have full plot summaries. Duarte Valério 15:30, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sister Morphine

message: Sister Morphine first appeared on Marianne Faithful's Album "Come My Way," released in 1965, so the song couldn't have been written in 1968 as the article claims. I cannot confirm if the lyrics were changed or even of the music was changed substantially, but as this is Faithfull's song I think much more should be put on her version (versions?) Cuvtixo 06:19, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually Faithfull's version was re-released on the most recent pressing of "Come My Way", a "bonus track" for the reissue. Stan weller 06:32, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I can confirm this. It's from the 1991 re-release of the original album, which contains 4 bonus tracks. Just listen to her voice on the original tracks and compare it to the one on "Sister Morphine" ;-) --Wikiplex (talk) 16:26, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Date!!!! 

message: A July '68 recording date doesn't fit with the Let It Be sessions, which began in November. 51.6.8.146 (talk) 20:25, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recording date
Talk:Economics of the arts and literature

message: I took this text from the French WP, although I think it needs some depth.
I put the cultural industries section before the labour market section, because the latter section supposes that you have read about cultural industries. Its most logical place is right after the artworks section.
I realize that there is regional bias left in the Molière/Tartuffe example. I would have liked to replace it by a Shakepeare example, but could not, because you really need the historical fact that performing the play in the 17th century took as many people and as much time as today, which, of course, also depends on the way they used to perform it. Well, at least there is a Wiki entry for Tartuffe.
: Hello. I am the main author of the French article. I got little feedback about it, so I would gladly have yours. What do you mean by "needs more depth" ?.--Bokken | 木刀 14:09, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: If someone with some skills in French is looking for related articles to translate, economics of museums is a Good Article on fr:, and significant work has been done on Payola. Most of the references are in English, and most of references in French are not crucial. Bokken | 木刀 09:00, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related articles 

message: Seria bem vinda uma tradução desse artigo pro português? att 2804:14C:5BB1:9AC7:E91B:8F51:53BF:66B5 (talk) 01:17, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{Ping|Luizpuodzius|Raimundo57br}}
Talk:Heliodorus of Emesa

message: I don't want to immediately edit this page (though if no interest/argument is made against my doing so, I shall), but surely the entry for the Aethiopica should be entirely separate from this entry on Heliodorus himself (much as with Xenophon of Ephesus and his Ephesian Tale)? -> Wiper 17:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Articles in One?

message: "Most scholars reject this identification." Which identification? A bit unclear, I think. That he is the author?--Mycomp (talk) 05:01, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear 

message: At the end of Aethiopica, Heliodorus refers to himself as "Heliodorus, a Phoenician of Emesus, son of Theodosius, and descended from the Sun". So should he really be identified here as a "Greek writer", or is there a more accurate phrase that could reflect the fact that he wrote in Greek, but his ethnic identity was Phoenician? 24.21.113.165 (talk) 19:46, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point.  He was what some people would term a "Hellenized oriental", but if he didn't call himself Greek, then we shouldn't... AnonMoos (talk) 10:59, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek writer?
Talk:Sonny Dunham

message: howard smith the drummer on staff at cbs in new york city from around 1947 until about 1961. he played with Sonny Dunham early  in  his  career.Smith was the drummer on the ED SULLIVAN SHOW and about twenty other shows per week on CBS.
 Looks ok - can anyone do anything with it?--Technopat (talk) 09:59, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good faith edit removed
Talk:Chariton

message: I don't want to immediately edit this page (though if no interest/argument is made against my doing so, I shall), but surely the entry for Chaereas and Callirhoe should be entirely separate from this entry on Chariton himself (much as with Xenophon of Ephesus and his Ephesian Tale)? -> Wiper 17:24, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Articles in One?

message: I have been presumptuous enough to change the title of his novel, where referenced, from "the loves of Chaereas and Challirhoe" to simply "Chaereas and Challirhoe", in keeping with the standard name attributed to the novel. If anyone would care to give a valid reason that this should not be acceptable, please make it known! -> Wiper 17:24, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title of the novel

message: Is it worth mentioning that part of this story has interested scholars of early Christianity, because of its several similarities to the possibly contemporaneous gospel accounts of the empty tomb of Jesus? HuPi (talk) 23:57, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian interest
Talk:Modekngei

message: I'd like a picture of the Nagatpang church. --Error (talk) 00:57, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: This article is very subpar.
Now, it appears to be solely because of the bizarre way that the article is worded, but a religion cannot be both monotheistic, and yet believe in baals as deities. That would be contradictory.
My guess is that whoever wrote this article forgot to (or, alternatively, didn't want to) clarify exactly what Palauan practitioners see the pagan baals of old time belief as. If they do view them as deities, then the religion is not monotheistic. If they see them as something else, then the article ought to reflect that.
Contributors to this article: please try better. Tharthan (talk) 11:03, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictions in the article
Talk:Gay, Michigan

message: The following is a list of how the Gay Bar has been described in this article:
# the main attraction in the town is the "Gay Bar," which is named after the town it resides in.
#  the main attraction in the town is the "Gay Bar," which is in fact a regular bar
#  the main attraction in the town is the "Gay Bar," which is, in fact, a bar catering to all
# the main attraction in the town is the Gay Bar, which is, in fact, a bar catering to residents and visitors of all stripes
This probably won’t be the end of it, but... number one is too vague (it leaves an immediate and important question about the place unanswered in the mind of the reader), the second one is disparaging, and the fourth one is clunky. The third one is arguably the most eloquent, sensitive, and informative, so that’s what I’m reverting to. 
One thing I'm sure about, however, is that the name of the bar should not appear in quotes, becasue the Gay Bar is literally the name of the bar. It is not a euphemism.
—Kairotic 17:33, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good call, I agree that #3 is just fine. -- dcclark (talk) 19:50, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, all you anonymous editors -- please stop going crazy with the reverts! I've warned two users anonymous users the 3RR. We had a good setup, let's keep it at what it was (read up). -- dcclark (talk) 03:55, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I took a picture of the bar's sign when I was driving through the city. Should scan it in and add it to the article? Or would that be feeling the trolls? Royalbroil T : C 03:08, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I had withdrawn my question by reverting myself, but someone reverted it. The question is withdrawn. Royalbroil T : C 00:17, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  No worries, you should do what you just did: say so here below your question. General Wikipedia etiquette is not to delete comments from Talk pages, whether they are still relevant or not. -- dcclark (talk) 00:29, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gay Bar
Talk:Kentucky Derby Museum

message: The information within this article does not justify an article in it's own right. Would be more appropriately merged into Kentucky Derby. thewinchester 17:35, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm curious as to why this was merged back - it seems to belong in its parent article as a heading, rather than out on its own here. Orderinchaos 17:24, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Kenny Sargent

message: I added information and cited it. I cited upreviously nsourced info and I removed the citation needed tag. I removed subjective and basic statements that added little to the article. 
His location of birth, his educational background (if he attended high school or college), a photo or two, some info on his personal life, and a discography would add a lot here.
--DiamondRemley39 (talk) 17:26, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup and what's next
Talk:Take a penny, leave a penny

message: Today, User:Kingboyk removed a lot of content, and User:Dismas re-added it, although I didn't personally agree with the removal of content, I respected the reasons for removal, now, in the interests of preventing (god forbid you two would) an edit war between high-profile deletionists and inclusionists, lets just fight it out below this line like normal wikipedians. aliasd·U·T 13:11, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Today's removal/revert 

message: I invented the concept of give a penny, it took me 7 years to get statements from the original 2 gas station workers only to find out that they don’t count. I’ve spent nearly $2000 trying to locate these people and a great deal more than that in time effort. I wish you read my story find it credible. In the mean time I will be going to my local paper and have it published. And maybe that will be a “reliable source” 
Long story short: I got back a bunch of Pennys cashier was out or other change I said leave them here let people use them, he put them in a cup a few days later it was still there I though it was neat so I did the same thing at mobile, I was a gas station hang around in my youth. I noticed it caught on after that year after year. Until finally the plastic trays came out which I don’t take credit for just the concept. Kldiamond3 (talk) 23:10, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The concept of give a penny
Talk:Mike Evans (actor)

message: This has to be the shortest bio that wikopedia has ever included. Is there no other info available about Mike?(63.3.67.133 01:05, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Short bio

message: Forgive me if I don't understand-- if his death was not released to the public until the following week how can date of death be posted as being Dec. 22, 2006--IMDB has not posted his date of death as of today Dec. 23 2006. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.7.200.141 (talk • contribs) 
:He died on the 14th, but some editors mistakenly assume he died the day the article came out. Jokestress 03:57, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  death
Talk:Sadler's Wells (horse)

message: This page is adequate, and I appreciate the work that has gone into it so far, but it needs a lot of work. We are dealing with the most important European Tb stallion in the last 25 years. I'll be on it from 17/4/2012 onwards.  Tigerboy1966  21:45, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey  Tigerboy1966 , do you want to tackle it now? I've got some sources, but I don't know the best UK websites to check out (equivalent of Bloodhorse, DRF). Jlvsclrk (talk) 03:11, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Main areas for improvement. Lede should probably be two paragraphs. Background should have something about the whole Magnier, Sangster, O'Brien Coolmore team. Racing career is factually complete (thanks to Timeform) but could use some quotes (Google news archive?). Stud career needs more narrative prose to go with the table. Sire of sires needs redoing- I remember that for a while there was a feeling that he wasn't going to make a mark in this area, which seems very odd now, and call me Euro-biased but El Prado shouldn't really have top-billing. As the old boy only died in 2011 there should be plenty of retrospectives still easily available online. The British broadsheets The Guardian, Daily Telegraph and The Independent have very good racing coverage and I like substantial racing articles to have some references from mainstream media. The Racing Post doesn't have the kind of archive it used to have on the website but this site  has quite a lot of their old stories. You might have to wait a while for replies from me as I'm on British Summer Time. Tigerboy1966  06:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  I gave it a shot, Tigerboy1966. Hard to find stuff on his racing years as there is SO much out there on his stallion career. Jlvsclrk (talk) 17:03, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here we go 

message: Don't know if we should add that his skeleton is now a featured display at the FHC Experience in County Tipperary: FHC Experience Museum Opens
Jlvsclrk (talk) 03:34, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skeleton 

message: The prose before the table should be moved up to the 'Background' section and merged with it, as much is duplicated on each. Hence, a fair bit of editing is needed. I'll see if I can get to this at some stage, but someone else is welcome to! Billsmith60 (talk) 10:39, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pedigree section
Talk:Diamond Approach

message: In the methodology section we currently have "Presence" and "Inquiry" - I am wondering if it would be worth adding "Superego defense" as a third major method. Seems to me that it is a pretty important basic method and does not fall into the other two categories. I thought I would see if anyone has anything to say before adding it. --Chinawhitecotton 19:19, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Superego Defense

message: Hm, no one responded about the Superego...guess I should add something.
Anyway, I decided to remove the link to the Diamond Logos site. I am not doing this to avoid reference to it, but because it seems confusing. My understanding is that Diamond Logos, founded by Faisal, is a different approach (as it suggests in the beginning of this article), so linking to it without an explanation that it is not the same as the Diamond Approach is not correct. Possible solutions:
*Start a new Diamond Logos page, and have a "related" link, because clearly they are related
*Add a paragraph in the D.A. article about what Diamnod Logos is and how it is different, then include the link.
Here is the link I cut out, for future reference: the DiamondLogos Teachings
--Chinawhitecotton 22:07, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Diamond Logos

message: I redirected the page to A._H._Almaas#The Diamond Approach (after merging).  Ruslik (talk) 08:26, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Jan Roháč of Dubá

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move to Jan Roháč z Dubé. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 07:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Scobie Breasley

message: scobie was great
No doubt, but I struggle to see how one can say he had great rivalry with Gordon Richards. He didn't come to England until 1954 and that was the year Richards retired. He was Richard's stable jockey up to at least 1968 however.(Victor Middlesex (talk) 04:01, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled