lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chaya Mushka Schneerson

message: In another case of non-controversial meaning lack or content, this article is woefully deficient. She is one of the most prominent Haredi women in history. PhatJew 22:43, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Mushka is Russian for little housefly. It's not an official name, it's a diminutive nickname derived either from Masha or from Mussya, which is itself a diminutive of a name like Maria, but whatever the case, Mashka, Mushka,  Musya are not a real passport ID name. 
This shows that the followers of  Haredi sects know nothing about their idols, all they know is superficial, rumor-based, hear say. Thank god for internet. When i was a kid studying in yeshiva i was told by a rabbi that teh Lubavitcher Rebbe invented atomic submarine and speaks 40 languages and everyone believed it. I was told that a isreali soldier was saved by the photo of teh rebbe in his breast pocket stopping a bullet. Your rebbe is literally an idol whom you worship like a deity.--184.161.151.104 (talk) 07:05, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mushka 
Talk:Hot Shots! Part Deux

message: For some reason I remember some reference somewhere of Martin Sheen's brother Joe Estevez doing the cameo, as he 'looks more like Martin Sheen than Martin Sheen does' or because he was the only one available. However, I can't find any reference for it...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.105.32.146 (talk) 01:17, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joe Estevez 

message: Richard Crenna's character, Col. Denton Walters, is a reference to his character on Brooks, who was Walter Denton. Tex 22:43, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Our Miss Brooks 

message: Not seen this film for a long time, but given (according to this ArticleA)it pARodies films like ApocaLypse aNow ANd ARambo, aI'd be surprised if it had no references to Platoon, AS aCharlie aSheen starred in it as the maIn protagonist ANd it waS set in aVietnaM. aCAn anyone confirm this aNd Add it to the list of films pARodied?
:Seems to be at least one reference, so I added it in. Turnstep 04:18, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Platoon 

message: I am appalled to report that the French version of this film is titled in French.  That is to say, they do not title it "Part Two", in English, in a mirror of the English name's use of French.  Now, as to finding a reference for this, I'm all tapped out.  Jouster  (whisper) 19:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  French version 
Talk:United States Army Forces in the Far East

message: It is missing from the order of battle. Srnec (talk) 02:57, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Didn't it become part of the USAFFE once it was called to the colors? --Yaush (talk) 19:13, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it was part of the USAFFE from 26 July 1941. It was the bulk of USAFFE's forces on 7 December 1941, yet it's not in either order of battle in the article. A glaring oversight. I'd correct it, but somebody's gone to all the trouble of adding those numbers. . . Srnec (talk) 03:00, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's the Philippine Army?
Talk:Attention versus memory in prefrontal cortex

message: This should probably be merged with prefrontal cortex or working memory or Working Memory Model. WU03 22:50, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What you believe does not seem relevant, memory and attention are two of the main things the brain does. And take Hawkins with a grain of salt. His ideas may be interesting (yes, I've read his book), but he strikes me more of a salesman than as a scientist, lifting many ideas from the literature without providing references. Anyhow: the subject of this page does have promise for an individual article, but right now it's a one paragraph history and a one paragraph summary of a PLoS paper that sounds like it was added by one of the authors. Instead of merging, a little bit more background providing other recent views would make this a good article, I think. digfarenough (talk) 22:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/TVRage.com (2nd nomination)

message: Evidence of that can be had by counting noses, above... a strict count shows more keeps than deletes. But the consensus here is nevertheless delete as many of the keeps aren't "real" participants. Nice work Aaron... very methodical close. Do you always put this much thought into your closes? ++Lar: t/c 00:37, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I try to, it's just not always so explicit.  Oh, and a note on the "real" participants: We're doing two things at once in AfD, that's finding facts and talking about how the facts fit into wikipedia.  I always encourage very new (nicer verbage that "not real"!) people to provide facts.  It's when it comes to the discussion about the facts that n00bs are sometimes given lesser weight.  For my part, I'll give almost as little weight to a naked "delete" vote by an editor with 5,000 votes as I would to a naked "keep" from someone with six.  Anytime you don't make an actual argument, you deny people the chance to refute that argument.  Hmmm... maybe I should box this up into a "brenneman's afd closing theory" in case I get asked again.brenneman{T}{L}  00:54, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Mmm... ya. Box it up, and sell it! I meant "real" more in the sense of serious participants than in the sense of new, serious meaning they did more than pop in and say OMFG KEEP!!!!11one1!11!! or nn vanispamcruft! Delete! (those caricature the new participants and the jaded AfD old hands respectively, I think). But ya, maybe the trout is coming the other way, you're right, wasn't worded very gracefully. (PS, this "Sorry! We could not process your edit due to a loss of session data. Please try again. If it still doesn't work, try logging out and logging back in." is really getting on my nerves) ++Lar: t/c 01:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD is a consensus, not a vote
Talk:Trouble (Akon album)

message: Yup, my copy is (P) and (C) 2003. It has 14 tracks, with all 4 UK bonus tracks but without "Ghetto". --217.39.35.230 (talk) 15:56, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Originally released in 2003 

message: The Deluxe Edition Bonus Disc have 10 songs not 11... There is no "Ghetto" (featuring Ali B & Yes R) on the album.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.105.224.52 (talk) 23:26, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deluxe Edition Bonus Disc 
Talk:Cabergoline

message: I got dostinex (cabergoline) in the UK.  Here it lists hairloss/thining as a possible side effect.  Could you confirm this?  If so is the case, this entry on cabergoline should be updated. (unsigned comment)
 
::I started cabergoline in May of 2012, and experienced some hair loss that only lasted for a week or two after the dose was increased to 0.5mg daily.  (I'm on it for restless leg syndrome, but I also have a pituitary adenoma and acromegaly with prolactin involvement.)  If you have a citable source for the hair loss side effect, please include the source and side effect in the article.  Thanks!  --Dulcimerist (talk) 23:46, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Hairloss

message: Usual dosage for Restless Leg Syndrome isn't listed in the "Dosage" section.  Sources I've dug up say it's a minimum daily dose of 0.5mg, up to a daily dose of 2mg - using the lowest possible amount to reduce symptoms.  Should I just make the edit, or wait for feedback or additional sources?  --Dulcimerist (talk) 23:13, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dosage - Restless Leg Syndrome 
Talk:Immobilarity

message: Transcription using Google News Advanced News Archive Search. USA Today (Jones, Steve. 4.D. November 9, 1999) review of Immobilarity (1999):
Dan56 (talk) 23:52, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: USA Today review

message: Transcription using Google News Advanced News Archive Search. Chicago Sun-Times (Kyles, Kyra. 13. January 9, 2000) review of Immobilarity (1999):
Dan56 (talk) 00:04, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Chicago Sun-Times review
Talk:Inferno match

message: Please do not ad spoilers untill they have been announced on T.V or WWE.com 
[Gravediggerfuneral]
he hasnt got his suit any more and hes gona have a match with mvp Sailor cuteness 18:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoilers

message: I have the understanding that matches with fire involved have been in wrestling longer than the WWE's "inferno" matches. For instance, I thought I read in a magazine (I think it was PWI) where one of these "fire" matches took place in Japan. If this is true, someone needs to either research this and update the article accordingly, or spell out the differences between the Japanese fire matches and the WWE version. [[Briguy52748 20:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other types of fire matches
Talk:Interrupt request

message: Overview paragraph here is not good. 12.219.83.157 10:13, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede 

message: This article is seriously lacking in many ways.  Also, note to would-be authors: x86 microprocessors aren't the only microprocessors.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.69.12.6 (talk) 18:00, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inadequate article 

message: unsourced stub, better to merge into a software section of the hardware article for now Widefox; talk 10:19, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely not. I can see how one might think this reasonable, given the current state of the IRQL article. But IRQL is a Windows internal software concept. Windows IRQLs exist on non-PC platforms (ARM, Itanium, and in the old days Alpha, PowerPC, and MIPS R4000); even on PCs, some of the IRQLs are not associated with "Interrupt requests" as described here; some of them are associated with purely software events and states. Yes, the IRQL article needs more information and detail, but that is no reason to merge it into a place where the material doesn't belong. Jeh (talk) 23:57, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  A software article would be better then. It may be older than NT kernel ?...a quick look...we have interrupt priority level and interrupt handler. Widefox; talk 20:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, it could go in NT kernel. If you don't mind I will propose that merge, replacing this merge proposal in IRQL (Windows). Given NT's heritage (David Cutler having been one of the chief architects of VMS) it is definitely the case that Windows NT's IRQLs are the same sort of thing as VMS's IPL, but I don't think the two belong in the same article. If anything the Interrupt priority level (VMS) article should be merged into the VMS article. Jeh (talk) 23:23, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agree we should change to a better target. interrupt priority level also mentions Linux, so seems natural to add Windows. There's hardware and software priority levels. I suggest merging to interrupt priority level to discuss at least all the software ones together as a topic. A quick check of sources seem to use the "interrupt priority" for both software and hardware, so that's a possible vendor neutral title if we want to move it. Widefox; talk 13:21, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to disagree. An IRQL is actually hardware-independent, whereas an interrupt priority level is definitely hardware-dependent. Windows maps in asychronous procedure calls, threads and a few other things into their IRQL table. I'd suggest leaving it be... anyway, it was quite inaccurate so I've rewritten it from scratch. - Letsbefiends (talk) 13:48, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[IRQL (Windows)]]
Talk:Example.com

message: Is it just me, or have example.com, example.net, and example.org gone down? – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 23:18, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Wayback Machine it seems to have happened in 2005 (com, net, org). Not simultaneously for all of them, though. Bromskloss 09:37, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  =/ Surely this is not a good thing, long ago as it may have happened. Shouldn't there be.... someone, who should deal with this? --Jeremy Banks 12:51, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Interesting. The sites server still respond to pings. --Jeremy Banks 22:28, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

text:  RFC 2606 (you can read it, it's short) does not say that the mentioned addresses should respond with a web page (nor are they required to respond in any other way). On a side note, "example.com", "example.net", "example.org", "www.example.com", "www.example.net" and "www.example.org" all resolve to the same IP address, namely "192.0.34.166". —Bromskloss 10:12, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

text:  They're up again. —Bromskloss 16:31, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Down again! -- Flutefluteflute Talk Contributions 11:59, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

text: And up again. Mbimmler 14:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Down?

message: How can it be that 8341888.example.com resolves to some Russian spammers IP?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdruiter (talk • contribs) 23:59, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  8341888 

message: The redirect 192.0.34.166 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  DefaultFree (talk) 08:12, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:192.0.34.166]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Humphrey Walwyn

message: From his place of birth (England) and that he joined the royal navy when he was 16 and he served in the royal navy most of his life led me to believe that he could not have attended a college in North America. The Britannia Royal Naval College (BRNC) in Dartmouth (the college) was originally known as the Royal Naval College, Dartmouth. It is the location of initial officer training in the Royal Navy, and is located on a hill overlooking the town of Dartmouth in the county of Devon, England. It was referred as Dartmouth College on his bio page for the Governor Page The Governorship of Newfoundland and Labrador. I shall place this text on his talk page also. HJKeats 23:20, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Humphrey T. Walwyn]] & [[Dartmouth College]] 
Talk:Politics of Gibraltar/1

message: "Suffrage: 18 years of age; universal, plus other UK subjects who have been residents six months or more 
"elections: none; the monarch is hereditary; governor appointed by the monarch; chief minister appointed by the governor 
huh?
Kwertii 07:33 30 May 2003 (UTC)
 
You can elect the members of the parliament! @Kwertii
Has anybody some information about Sir Francis Richards?
--Nadja 14:43, 18 Apr 2004 (UTC)

message: Explanation for new readers: I [Pcb21] moved a section from from the Politics section of the main Gibraltar article to this talk for two reasons:
# The politics section of the main Gibraltar article should be a summary of the most important aspects of politics with detail in the Politics of Gibraltar article. The old situation had a mix of important and less important information in the main article.
# The section was not neutral (see reasons below)''
An anon replies: 
I am moving this information (which is entirely accurate) back to the Gibraltar page, although I have toned down the emotive language from both sides and removed the following sentence Nevertheless, the fact is that the original Gibraltar inhabitants were expelled by the British forces in 1704 and had to relocate in San Roque.
[The material has been moved to a new section "Disputes with Spain".]
:Anon, with the renewed material we still have a layout problem in terms of only presenting the most important information on the main article and detail in the subsidary article.
:Thanks for toning down the language. Although it includes many facts, the "Disputes with Spain" section still reads very one-sidedly. The material is definitely being presented from a pro-Gibraltarian POV. Pcb21| Pete 07:43, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  The information below is not POV
Talk:Uparaja

message: Did you mean 'Uparat' by a title of Crown prince as in the western monarch?
There was NO Crown prince title in thai monarch until the reign of Rama V
This is another example of articles written by 'farangs' who thought they knew something about Thai history; only that they don't
:Firstly, you're too damn charming.  You might like to tone down the charisma.   Secondly, the article doesn't mention crown princes.  What are you talking about? Markyour words 23:29, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Remove merge because the Uparaja in Siam has its own traditions and history which is unique among other Southeast Asian nations, and the subject deserves an article of its own. Sodacan (talk) 21:50, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to Front Palace withdrawn
Talk:Vanderbilt Avenue (Brooklyn)

message: Does anyone object to this being moved to Vanderbilt Avenue (Brooklyn) and a separate article being created for the Vanderbilt Avenue in Manhattan? --DMG413 23:26, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So, this question has been back and forth over the years, with more undiscussed action than vice versa. Anyway a discussion has begun at Talk:Vanderbilt Avenue. Please present your views. Jim.henderson (talk) 00:09, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with [[Vanderbilt Avenue]]
Talk:American Meteorological Society

message: Many of the worldwide leading scientists in the fields of atmospheric air pollution dispersion modeling and air quality modeling are meteorologists and they are also members of the American Meteorological Society.  In their applied meteorology programs, many universities worldwide teach undergraduate and postgraduate courses in air pollution dispersion modeling.  Why is this subject not even mentioned in this article? - mbeychok 23:27, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why no mention of atmospheric pollution dispersion modeling?

message: Certified Broadcast Meteorologist is not much longer than the section on CBM in this article. I propose it be merged here. -Atmoz (talk) 21:44, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it.--CurtisSwain (talk) 02:14, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Certified Broadcast Meteorologist here? 

message: Is this accurate?: "A survey of members of the American Meteorological Society found that only 30% said they have concerns about rising temperatures." (Source: https://presidentialhill.com/greta-thunberg-fined-for-disobeying-police/)  If so, shouldn't it be mentioned? Kdammers (talk) 13:52, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  climate change
Talk:Tribe of Zebulun

message: The article says:
"The prophet Jonah was a member of the Tribe of Zebulun ()."
But the cited verse:
:15 for the LORD will smite Israel, as a reed is shaken in the water; and He will root up Israel out of this good land, which He gave to their fathers, and will scatter them beyond the River; because they have made their Asherim, provoking the LORD. 
has no apparent relevance to this claim. Colonies Chris 23:36, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: After some Google research, it seems that the intended verse is 2 Kings 14:25, from which Rabbi Johanan in the Talmud identifies Jonah as a Zebulonite, on the basis that the city mentioned is in Zebulun's teritory. I'll change the verse accordingly. --Eliyak T·C 22:34, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Jonah

message: Please show the symbol of Zebulon.  The other tribe symbols are shown.  Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.194.118.10 (talk) 19:34, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symbol of Zebulon 

message: According to the article, Zebulun stretches from "its eastern border being the Sea of Galilee, the western border being the Mediterranean Sea". However, the map pictured shows Zebulun as landlocked, touching neither sea. 
This is relevant to Bible prophecy. Genesis 49:13 claims "Zebulun shall dwell at the haven of the sea; and he [shall be] for an haven of ships; and his border [shall be] unto Zidon." (KJV)
A brief reading of some commentaries on this verse shows some disagreement. 
* "This tribe touched upon the coast of the sea of Kinnereth and of the Mediterranean" -Barnes' Notes on the Bible Genesis 49:13 at bible.cc
* "...it neither reached to the Mediterranean, nor touched directly upon Zidon (see my Comm. on Joshua). It really lay between the Sea of Galilee and the Mediterranean, near to both, but separated from the former by Naphtali, from the latter by Asher." -Keil and Delitzsch Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament 
Do we know enough to say whether or not the borders touched either of these seas?
Junkernaught (talk) 04:08, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Territory of Zebulun
Talk:Lego Star Wars II: The Original Trilogy

message: In the free play is the cantina bigger that the first game, and can you drive vehichles in the free mode? Also can you switch between characters like lthe first game? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.76.46.197 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Go to www.google.com type in 'Lego Star Wars II Review' and click the first link you see. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Kinslayer (talk • contribs) 07:45, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  the free mode 

message: Shouldn't the topics above ("XBOX 360 and RELEASE DATE", "Lobot and leia and jango", "the free mode") be archived?? GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 13:09, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: "XBOX 360 and RELEASE DATE", "Lobot and leia and jango" have been archive but not "the free mode" GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 00:45, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unarchived topics 

message: Why is the image for the second section so low quality? Keo Venzee (talk) 18:33, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, a better quality image would be good. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 19:39, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Low quality image of Dagobah game level