Talk:Philosophical aspects of the abortion debate

message: I noticed the change as shown at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Philosophical_aspects_of_the_abortion_debate&type=revision&diff=711385690&oldid=707235538 and don't think it should have been done.
The removed text is not an explanation, but instead the inclusion of one important motive by which people assume abortion to be legal, that is: they don't agree with (and counter/oppose) the argument (more specifically some premise) used to criminalize it or to turn it into an anti-ethical action. Rhalah (talk) 15:32, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Philosophical aspects of the abortion debate

message: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion advocacy movement coverage, an RFC that will affect the title of the articles currently titled Support for the legalization of abortion and Opposition to legal abortion if consensus is found in favor of its conclusions, is now in its community feedback phase and ready for editors to register opinions and arguments.  Please add your feedback; thanks! —chaos5023 (talk) 17:59, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion advocacy movement coverage]] ready for community feedback 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 22:05, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Philosophical aspects of the abortion debate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100816072853/http://homepage.mac.com:80/francis.beckwith/Thomson.pdf to http://homepage.mac.com/francis.beckwith/Thomson.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The idea that upper brain birth occurs at 19-20 weeks comes from a pro-life site and is unsubstantiated in scientific debate. Here's two papers, with one saying brain birth is 24-28. The other gives a few examples in an overview of the subject, with the lowest upper-brain birth estimate being 22-24. We should use these sources to substantiate the upper brain birth claims, not some extremely biased, non-scientific site.
First source (study, says 24-28): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1375829/
Summary of the debate, lowest upper-brain birth is 22-24, with most estimates much higher: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1377672/
Jasper0333 (talk) 23:38, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  19-20 week brain birth is unsubstantiated