Talk:Sailor Senshi

message: This article has a few problems here and there. Is there a way we can think really hard to merge it with the Sailor Moon article or other articles? it seems to repeat a lot of information plus include fan POV, which is supposed to be out of our scope. Is there a way to take out the important info and then merge it with existing articles? Since there is a lot of talk of merging, I noticed, this article, too, could be subject to it.--Hitsuji Kinno (talk) 23:34, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Mayyyybe. It would be pretty hard, so if we did that, I'd like to do it in another "round" of merges and not try to take care of it right now with all the other stuff going on. The other thing is that this does have secondary-source information and critical reception stuff, so it really can hold its own as an article if we get it tidied up. --Masamage ♫ 02:02, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repetition? Merge it? 

message: I go away for a little while and people try and stip more content out of things. Sersioulsy. Stop. Unless you're adding info or it's wrong, don't touch it. Lego3400:  The Sage of Time (talk) 02:58, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Please assume good faith and be civil. The result of the above discussion was that we should remove the photograph as it violates a fundamental policy: No original research. I have already notified the Anime WikiProject to see if other users can get involved in this matter here. Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:46, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Theres no need to for this image at all. Its Original research because no source "highlights" given aspects of the source. There is already an image of the sailor senshi. Also on the note of "adding" many articles NEED trimming. We cant keep trivia, original research/unverifiable claims.Lucia Black (talk) 05:21, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

text: Only stuff that people have thought worth noting in a reliable source is eligible to be in the article. And even if the information did have citations the way to do it would be to label the pieces in the diagram and then have the text describing them in the text where they can be edited and cited properly. The illustration without all the original research just labels would I believe be ok under WP:OI but of course there's no point unless it can accompany such cited text. Dmcq (talk) 10:18, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The relevance of the image is in question. Even if it could be cited, the image would be considered trivial or unnecessary.Lucia Black (talk) 18:37, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

text: Again, only stuff that people have thought worth noting in a reliable source is eligible to be in the article. The way to do it would be to label the pieces in the diagram. The illustration without the original research would be okay under WP:OI. As such, we should leave it out unless it can accompany such cited text. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:32, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  OBJECTION! 

message: This article has several issues as noted at the top of the page. Most of it is fan-cruft, overdetailed descriptions of minor stuff (such as uniforms or power guardians), similar to the former Saiyan (Dragon Ball) article. My proposal, section by section, goes as follows:
*Sailor Team (Guardian and Outer Senshi): trim to its basics and add it to the List of characters, before Mercury, Mars, Jupiter and Venus, and Uranus, Neptune, Pluto and Saturn respectively.
*Uniform and power-ups: the contents from this section are already covered in each Senshi's "Aspects and forms" section. Nothing worth saving, perhaps a general, brief description of the Sailor Fuku in the List of Sailor Moon characters.
*Variants: re-tell of Sailor Stars. Nothing worth saving.
*Sailor Princesses: the contents from this section are already covered in each Senshi's "Princess Planet" section. Nothing worth saving.
*Sailor Power Guardians: move to the list of characters.
*Sailor Crystals: in-universe cruft.
*Silver Crystal: trim and merge into the "Special powers and items" section in Usagi's article, under a whole new subsection.
*Critical attention: keep reliable sources and move section to the Legacy and Reception sections in the List of characters.
Thoughts? --LoЯd ۞pεth 03:48, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Some well sourced from all across the article, especially the intro, and the Sailor Team and Uniforms sections, can be placed under a "Concept and Creation" section in the List of characters. --LoЯd ۞pεth 04:14, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal