Talk:Point Counter Point

message: "Thus, Point Counter Point could be best described as a novel of ideas." Redundant? I'm removing this.  Ph33rspace (talk) 00:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why redundant? If someone doesn't know it is, then it may be a helpful characterisation. Ammimajus (talk) 20:01, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy 

message: This article needs to be rewritten without the author's opinion included.
--24.92.28.176 05:52, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure? I thought Marjorie's husband didn't divorce her, for religious reasons. - mako 21:43, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I didn't change it. I just finished it. I am going to look for the point where it says she was married. Yes, you are right. She is married to Carling, (last name.) I'm sorry for the confusion. It is stated on the first page of the book. Squanderdalfast 19:52, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy 

message: I'm going to attempt to update this--with sources--over the weekend. Anyway, my main concern is that this article should reflect the fact that Huxley's characters are all based on real people. Rampion=D.H. Lawrence, Burlap=John Middleton Murry, Lucy Tantamount=Nancy Cunard, etc. Like I said, I'll do it myself, but if you happen upon this and would like to help, my thanks in advance. L Glidewell 02:34, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Roman á clef'' 

message: :Image:Pointcounterpoint.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Pointcounterpoint.jpg

message: There is a fur in heraldry called "Potent Counter-Potent" in which the heads of crutches (potent is an old name for a crutch) touch each in the centre of the shield. Perhaps the idea of mutually supporting cripples is in the title too. Ammimajus (talk) 20:04, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potent Counter-Potent 

message: The introductory section says that Everard Webley is modelled on Sir Oswald Mosley, but later it's shown that he wasn't, and couldn't have been.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:5602:2301:11E8:C09D:DE04:247B (talk) 22:46, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mosley