Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Instantnood, et al.

message: The vote page mentioned in jguk's filing on this case is currently on VfD, were the page to be deleted it could jeopardize the retrieval of evidence.  We request that in order to preserve the evidence that the vote page  be protected from further editing.  --Wgfinley 21:50, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for Injunction

message: This case has been sitting here for quite a while now without being opened.  I have urged my client to not engage in edit warring with the others involved.  This certainly isn't stopping them from going through dozens of articles and POV pushing them and essentially ignoring the NPOV China Naming convention.  It appears they have used this case to take advantage of the situation.  As evidence, SchmuckyTheCat from 18 April alone:
====Changing the content from "mainland China" to "China" or "PRC"====
*Economy of Asia
*Pacific Rim
*List of countries and territories by current account balance
*List of countries and territories by reserves of foreign exchange and gold
*List of companies in the People's Republic of China (moved from list of companies in mainland China at 16:19, Apr 2, 2005 by SchmuckyTheCat)
*Economy of Germany 
*Economy of the Democratic Republic of the Congo
*Walnut, California
*San Gabriel, California
*Chinatown in Latin America
*Economy of Togo
*Economy of Sudan
*Economy of Seychelles
*Economy of South Korea
*Economy of Myanmar
*Economy of Mauritius
*Economy of Laos
====Moving articles between categories====
*Special economic zone of the People's Republic of China (from :category:Mainland China to :category:People's Republic of China, and from :category:Economy of mainland China to :category:Economy of the People's Republic of China)
*Chinese ecnomic reform (from :category:Mainland China to :category:People's Republic of China, and from :category:Economy of mainland China to :category:Economy of the People's Republic of China)
*Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (from :category:Economy of mainland China to :category:Economy of the People's Republic of China)
*List of companies in the People's Republic of China (moved from  :category:Companies of mainland China to :category:Companies of the People's Republic of China) 
I have dozens of more diffs from prior days that I can also bring forward, this is just a sample of one day of activity.  My client is going to be criticized/have a case brought against him for actually asking people what they thought in a poll but this behavior of systematically making dozens of moves on a single day is not?  We wish to counter against Schmucky's case, have this matter move forward and an injunction be issued prohibiting all parties from making changes to the naming of these articles, categories and creating of additional articles and categories until the case can be heard.  --Wgfinley 18:02, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional Requests for Movement/Injuntion

message: *Special economic zone of the People's Republic of China (from :category:Mainland China to :category:People's Republic of China, and from :category:Economy of mainland China to :category:Economy of the People's Republic of China)
*Chinese ecnomic reform (from :category:Mainland China to :category:People's Republic of China, and from :category:Economy of mainland China to :category:Economy of the People's Republic of China)
*Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (from :category:Economy of mainland China to :category:Economy of the People's Republic of China)
*List of companies in the People's Republic of China (moved from  :category:Companies of mainland China to :category:Companies of the People's Republic of China) 
I have dozens of more diffs from prior days that I can also bring forward, this is just a sample of one day of activity.  My client is going to be criticized/have a case brought against him for actually asking people what they thought in a poll but this behavior of systematically making dozens of moves on a single day is not?  We wish to counter against Schmucky's case, have this matter move forward and an injunction be issued prohibiting all parties from making changes to the naming of these articles, categories and creating of additional articles and categories until the case can be heard.  --Wgfinley 18:02, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving articles between categories

message: This case hase been open for six weeks now, and none of the arbitrators have followed it up. Where is it going? Susvolans (pigs can fly) 07:28, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this case going anywhere?