Talk:Duluth model

message: The in response section is extremely biased and not written with a NPOV.  Michael H 34 (talk) 14:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: And no reference to the actual studies that article refers to.  Has no-one managed to *find* these studies? jae (talk) 10:20, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple references to one newspaper article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Duluth model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110728094345/http://www.theduluthmodel.org/history.php to http://www.theduluthmodel.org/history.php
*Added  tag to http://www.malesurvivor.on.ca/files/uploads/.../menandhealingfinal.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150319081107/http://www.bwjp.org:80/files/bwjp/files/Countering_Confusion_Duluth_Model.pdf to http://www.bwjp.org/files/bwjp/files/Countering_Confusion_Duluth_Model.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Batteredmen.com has been taken over by a lingerie company, and the link is now to a list of fetish gear. Kakrofoon (talk) 00:49, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , replaced with a link to the same paper on ResearchGate. the wub "?!" 00:53, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 17 Probably Needs Removal 

message: The Duluth Model is the Coordinated Community Response, the most widely emulated approach to domestic violence on earth. It’s not one batterer program curriculum. It seems that someone who wants to sell a batterer program is highly invested in presenting inaccurate information on this page. Sharpcheeser (talk) 23:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you explain more? --  Python Drink (talk) 20:41, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This entry is filled with incorrect information 

message: "As of 2006, the Duluth Model is the most common batterer intervention program used in the United States.[4]" This is minor compared to the other discussion on this page, but still: 2006 was sixteen years ago. Do we have a more recent source on this? If so, this might be worth updating. Fyrius (talk) 14:43, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation from 2006 in the lede 

message: Reference 6 is www.theduluthmodel.org, which is obviously going to be biased in favor of the model. It should probably noted somewhere in the article that Reference 6 is the official website.
174.242.133.62 (talk) 18:44, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 6 should have a disclaimer 

message: I ask  to discuss their preferred edits here rather than edit warring. Thanks, Generalrelative (talk) 21:30, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: If the author of a specific model uses extremely strong language and scientifically valid arguments that "debunk" the model, it should be added since otherwise its not accurately displaying the scientific validity of the claims. Risky texter (talk) 21:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: (the author and others authoritative instances/..) Risky texter (talk) 21:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you show that the preponderance of reliable secondary sources use this language? If so, I'll be on board. But a single source is not going to cut it. At most it might be due for an attributed opinion. Generalrelative (talk) 23:02, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed content