lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:CNN.com

message: Anyone else find that CNN.com fairly often changes the content of their articles without any notice?  It's very frustrating.  Yesterday CNN reported that an Israeli ambassador to the US said that the C802 missile used by hezbollah against their ship was Chinese-made : on this page : .  However it has since been changed.  However, KLTV reported this : , which contains essentially the same information, and attributes it to CNN.  What's more is that if you search for "israeli ambassador" or "c-802" on CNN.com, that CNN article comes up in the search results even though neither of those terms appear in the article now.  One wonders how this affects CNN's reputation of journalistic integrity.--Paraphelion 11:56, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  CNN.com regularly edits their articles without any notice 

message: I suggest that we redirect this page to the article on CNN much as the following news company URLs do:
* FoxSports.com
* Washingtonpost.com
* Foxnews.com
I think that having this CNN.com article is rundendent and not neccessary since we already have the CNN article. 
Eric 05:20, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. JCO312 16:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree too; there isn't a need for an article on the website. In regards to what CJ King said, I've redirected, as opposed to merging, seeing as there isn't really any content to merge in the first place. Picaroon 22:02, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to CNN
Talk:Employers Resource Council

message: Admin - currently attempting to construct page to fall in line with NPOV.  Understand issue and feel I have removed all problems.  If further editing is required to fix copyright/advertising feel issues please notify me before page deletion!
Have permission from source to use content, but have removed anyway due to advertising feel.  My goal is to explain why the organization is significant, not to try to promote it.
Pmurray 17:26, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:ASP

message: http://www.teenmusic.com/video.asp is an asp file. What is it? SqueakBox 17:17, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A web page created with Active Server Pages. Content can be anything. --S.K. 18:08, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I need to add an branch/link to a page Airborne_Surveillance_Platform with acronym ASP..
As i see, i have two options , either add it in combat section or create a new section named aircraft/avionics.
I am asking this coz' i'm relatively  a new editor and do no want to mixup anything here.
any pointers would be highly appreciated.
Swraj (talk) 16:27, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section Choice? 

message: The terms Automated Spooling Program and Attached Support Processor are incorrect. The name of the program is either Attached Support Processor or Asymmetric Multiprocessor, depending on release. The processors supported by ASP are referred to as either the Support processorThere's only one in the complex or as Main processorsThere may be several. Typically the support processor was smaller than the main processors.
Question: is it appropriate to cite a manual on a disambiguation page? Specifically,
--Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (talk) 22:23, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terms '''Attached Support Processor''' and '''Automated Spooling Program''' are incorrectly described.
Talk:Azad Hind Radio

message: I can't find any trace in the references. :-(  It never happened. Hyderabad remained under British occupation. I will delete ", and later to Hyderabad, following the course of the war in Southeast Asia.". If there is a report that the station HQ was moved to some other hopefully Japanese-occupied place after Singapore, please look for it. I can't find it anywhere. Spamhog (talk) 12:47, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who exactly reported Azad Hind Radio HQ moved from Japanese occupied Singapore to Hyderabad in British occupied India? 

message: Surely the purpose of this station wasn't to encourage Indians to "fight for freedom" as the article currently states. It was to encourage Indians to make trouble for the British in India, and so reduce their ability to fight the Nazis and Japanese. I don't think the independence of India was a high priority for the Germans in Berlin - the Nazis were very keen on colonialism and would have viewed Indians as Untermensch, which the British generally didn't. --Ef80 (talk) 20:44, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fight for freedom"? 
Talk:Aplite

message: I've been looking at this article for years now, trying to work out how to rewrite it. It's not that most of the EB text is wrong, it's just that it misses out, for instance, on the important association with pegmatites. This has come into prominence in more recent years thanks to these becoming a target for their associated Lithium mineralisation. Also we have a definition from Le Maitre et al. "Aplite. A term used both for fine-grained granitic rocks, consisting only of feldspar and quartz, and as a group name for any leucocratic fine-grained to aphanitic dyke rock." There are no review papers though (that I've found so far), so it's hard to work out a really global view. Mikenorton (talk) 09:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Now rewritten using more recent sources. I will add something on their importance regarding Li mineralisation at some point. Mikenorton (talk) 16:15, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Calgary Police Service

message: This article is short and awful... someone needs to update it.
:Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to…) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. - Qyd 03:13, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just so everyone knows, I've just finished fixing references that state that HAWC1 is a Eurocopter EC120.  Simply put, it's not.  It is an MD Helicopters MD 520N, a NOTAR design.  This is glaringly obvious, as HAWC2 has a clearly visible tail rotor, while HAWC1 does not.
Feel free to dispute me on this.
HistoryMaker2001 (talk) 06:15, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  HAWC1
Talk:Sam Doumit

message: * Can anyone verify that Doumit is the face used in the SuicideGirls logo? --Navstar 15:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, IMDB is entirely user submitted with zero fact checking.  So I wouldn't use that as a sole source of information. --Navstar 22:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SuicideGirls logo 

message: It's says she born in 1985 but bottom of page links says 1975 so which on is it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.0.144.18 (talk) 19:39, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: age.
Talk:Eric Bentley

message: I removed the :Image:Bentley.jpg of a Bentley automobile. - Ted Wilkes 17:27, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Among the recent additions to the article is to list him as having been a "singer". I'm not saying it's wrong, I'm just saying it surprises me. Does someone have a citation? - Jmabel | Talk 18:59, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singer?
Talk:Yua Aida

message: This actress' work lacks historical significance and the page should be removed.Paradise coyote (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 17:06, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, let's get rid of Amanda Peet's page then, too. Give me a break.--Bentonia School (talk) 05:36, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Subject lacks historical significance

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 20:14, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment
Talk:Louis Antoine, Duke of Enghien

message: The recent move of this page so that it no longer mentions the subject's title was improper: First, it violates our naming conventions on royalty, specifically rule #3 under "Royals with a substantive title", which stipulates "If a prince(ss) holds a substantive title that is not princely (a peerage, for instance), use 'Prince(ss) {first name}, {title}'. Examples: Prince Andrew, Duke of York and Prince Edward, Earl of Wessex." Second, if that choice is unacceptable (since the subject of this article held the rank of prince du sang without using (in France) the title of "prince", then we are required to use the person's most common name in English: The subject of this article is overwhelmingly known in English as "Duke of Enghien" or "Duc d'Enghien", rather than as "N...Bourbon-Condé". Third, because it violated a current rule of consensus, this was a controversial move and should have been brought to this page for discussion & vote before any action was taken. I call for this action to be undone. FactStraight (talk) 03:39, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: I think this article breaches Wikipedia's stance of neutrality. There are conflicting viewpoints of the execution: some say it was legit, others say it was trumped up. Regardless, I think the article should include the viewpoints of both sides instead of being one-sided.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.43.19.17 (talk) 00:26, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Trumped up charges" 

message: hi i see your comments. i believe that they think it's "vandalism" when you changed without discussing on the talk page. the new image is interesting, but younger and not as good quality of a representation. the change from death to murder, while i might agree, is moving to loaded language. let the reader decide based on a neutral description of the facts. the change to the pronunciation messed up the coding in my browser. if you have new references or language, please discuss on the talk page first to build a consensus. this works better for the better quality articles, where there are multiple editors.  Slowking4⇔ †@1₭ 14:08, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: ip editor edit warring

message: Pray tell, fellow, what are these "true facts" & how do they compare to "false facts"?  "the facts" or "the truth" are apt, but 'true facts" indicate ineptness on the part of those who use the phrase. AptitudeDesign (talk) 08:11, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  'true facts" 

message: This article suggests that the Duc D'Enghien was framed, but the napoleon-series.org article on the affair reports that Enghien acknowledged being in the service of the British: http://www.napoleon-series.org/research/miscellaneous/c_enghien.html
Which is it? 108.254.160.23 (talk) 03:23, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accurate article?
Talk:Paula Malai Ali

message: When did Paula leave Channel [V]? o_O 203.100.24.127 00:52, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Channel [V]

message: I understand that Malays typically do not have surnames, and thus take the name of their father (at least, in Malaysia). However, I am not sure if this is the practice in Brunei. Can anyone clarify this? It would help with the categorisation. Johnleemk | Talk 17:37, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Surname?
Talk:The Legend of Suriyothai

message: * JIRATTIKORN, Amporn(2003) 'Suriyothai: hybridizing Thai national identity through film', Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 4: 2, 296 — 308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1464937032000113015 --Paul_012 (talk) 10:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential reference 

message: This page was previously a sort of gushing, unsourced review of the film. I took the source listed above, read it, and put in some changes where needed. I also corrected the previous author's English, although I left most of his original intent unchanged, just taking out some of the really excessive stuff (e.g. "Many in the film industry note Suriyothai for its grandeur and scope").
I remember hearing a couple facts about this film which might be interesting to put in, if we can find sources:
- Does Queen Sikrit see herself as Suriyothai's reincarnation?
- Was the film produced in order to be entered into the Oscar competition?
Huanohk (talk) 07:36, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large Edits 
Talk:IBC Root Beer

message: The second paragraph of this article doesn't even come close to a NPOV. Someone please correct it. Adding his wife's name would be a good start. - November 23rd, 2007  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.233.244.255 (talk) 05:47, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: I believe ownership of IBC has changed from Cadburry Schwepps to MOTT's (Apple Sauce, Juice, etc). Just look on the side of any new IBC packages. It says:
MOTT'S INC RYE BROOK, NY.
---
According to the Wiki Mott's article, Mott's is a division of Cadbury Schweppes, so this looks like just an internal restructuring. Ericbalkan (talk) 18:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MOTT's 

message: I've read some unsourced rumors that the original independent St. Louis IBC recipe was sold to the diner Carl's Drive-In in St. Louis, and that Dr. Pepper/7-Up Company sent flavor analysts to Carl's to basically reverse-engineer the flavor of their ("IBC"-labeled) root beer into the current nationally distributed IBC. Could anyone substantiate/find sources on this?--69.150.176.111 (talk) 06:26, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Original recipe/Carl's Drive In

message: The article mentions a 2016 reformulation of the product.  While I can confirm the product change (the new IBC is revolting), this bit of information should be sourced.  2601:3CA:204:F860:2D4F:4D6B:BAC1:CE19 (talk) 17:52, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed for reformulation
Talk:Mille Pattes Records

message: I created a redirect at Les Productions Mille-Pattes but I think we should move the article there because that's the official name of the company and usually we keep names that way in Wikipedia, regardless of the language. If no answers in the next few days I'll proceed with the move. --Red Star 17:44, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Roti (West Indian)

message: Need some formatting cleanup... also, can anyone justify this article's existance?  I.e. what is being said here that couldn't be merged into the main Roti article, which isn't very long to begin with?--Isotope23 17:51, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge to Roti complete.  I'll drop a redirect here once Roti is stable.--Isotope23 19:32, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Stub types for deletion/Log/Deleted/March 2006

message: I realize this is a very minor point, but...  Why do we have entries under third-level headings on this page, but fourth-level on the SFD page, necessitating editing each entry?  Wouldn't it be more straightforward to use fourth-levels headings consistently?  Alai 17:53, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been doing it because it seems strange to me to have a page which jumps straight to third and fourth level headings. I see your point about editing though. However I don't feel strongly about it one way or another, so I'm certainly OK with going with whatever exists on the page. --TheParanoidOne 22:55, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose we could always do the reverse, and use "zeroth", first and second level headings on the main page, and first and second here...  Alai 02:56, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Log section levels...
Talk:ASTRA Museum

message: I went through this and copy-edited; I also recommended it for WP:DYK. 
A few things needing clarification: "folk techniques" is an unfamiliar phrase, I suspect there is an English term meaning the same. Maybe "folk technology" or "vernacular technology"? (They mean the same; I'd favor the first because keeping the word "folk" seems right).
"…houses and community establishments": "community establishments" is vague. "Public buildings"? And if not, could someone clarify?
"…a bowling area from the Păltiniș monastery…" Really? Bowling?
"store tiles": unclear. Store signs, or something else? 
"biannual" is a very uncommon and somewhat ambiguous word in English: "semi-annual" or "biennial"?
- Jmabel | Talk 17:58, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A few things needing clarification

message: are required Victuallers (talk) 20:50, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Gemmule (pangenesis)

message: Anyone wanna take a crack at wikifying this? ka1iban 18:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  I've left the quotes for now, as they are a useful start, though they should really be replaced by material from Darwin's writings. --Memestream 11:51, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  , not really, nobody has done much to this since 2007. I've tidied it up, but there is a large overlap with Pangenesis which isn't really acceptable (see WP:FORK). If we were really going to stick to talking only about gemmules there'd not be a lot to say; adding any explanation and context will overlap more and more with Pangenesis. I think a merge would be the right answer, so we have one decent article with context, theory, and properly attributed quotations. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:53, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: , I agree that a merge makes the most sense, especially since the pangenesis page could use better organization and more content as well. I am researching and writing on this for a class project so I'm fully willing to put in the time and effort. It seems like most of the content of this page could be wikified and used to supplement the 'Theory' section of the Pangenesis page. Do you think this is a good way to merge? I will of course discuss this on the Pangenesis page before I change anything major. Xavier.bower (talk) 19:08, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's roughly what I envisage, yes. As usual, the devil will be in the detail. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:47, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Anyone
Talk:Symphosius

message: The redirect was in the wrong direction; I had no qualms lifting the squib of article from the Symposius article as it was, since it was an essentially unmodified EB 1911 stub (thus: no significant "edit history" to be worth keeping), and in fact I so considerably modified it that there's not much left of the 1911: so I also removed the Britannica tag. Bill 18:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: My edit
Talk:Ministry of Interior (Israel)

message: Support, but only if the article is cleaned up. Great effort nonetheless. --Shuki 18:12, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Israeli Ministry of Interior → Ministry of Interior (Israel) — Name should be disambiguated in a standardised manner per Ministry of Defense (Israel) —TewfikTalk 17:15, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This appears to be uncontroversial, so I will move this page as requested. I've also moved the page on the environmental ministry per the rationale given here. Dekimasuよ! 09:27, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Alien Nine

message: For those who don't like to sit through the end credits of a show, this is one show you do not leave until they are finished! It's a spoiler, but Something Big happens during the end credits of episode 4 that makes you wish they had done another episode. CFLeon 23:21, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Watch the WHOLE Thing, People!!! 

message: There are 4 volumes of manga for Alien Nine, not three.  There is Alien Nine Volumes 1-3, and then there is Alien Nine: Emulators, which I have seen no mention of what so ever of in this artical.  The source for this is the 'store' section of Central Park Media's offical Alien Nine sight - http://www.centralparkmedia.com/alien9/store.html
Could someone please edit this artical so it is correct.  I would do it myself, but I have no clue how to change the source tags in the artical.  I have also yet to regester for a wiki account. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.137.31.130 (talk) 00:38, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Volumes 

message: The info about symbolism in the series is dismissed as an original research. While that is quite true (and I have my own idea of symbolism in this series), I think it's interesting enough and should be reposted here. - DTRY 13:05, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symbolism 

message: "Alien" is simple enough but what is the significance of "nine" in the title? This ought to be explained. Is there a team of nine aliens? 184.146.6.191 (talk) 10:03, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I'm aware, it has never been made clear what the title refers to.  However, if you can find a good source explaining it, feel free to add an explanation.  G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 16:51, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

text: Their symbiotes, are of ninth generation. Its never explained what the deal is, beyond the fact higher generation symbiotes are more powerful. Then again, their society is plenty fucked in every single way, and its doing a good job to mask that.--Stalkerkun (talk) 21:08, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Messier 74

message: That name (the Phantom Galaxy) from this.  Don't you dare tell me that this name wasn't heard before!— Hurricane Devon ( Talk ) 18:29, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *I* hadn't heard of it before, nor have many other. Messier 74 is far more common name, and we should use it. We have discussed this before. It's OK to mention the nickname in the article, but renaming the article is against Wikipedia policy and using the nickname elsewhere in the article makes it confusing.--Jyril 18:42, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The fact that someone added a "common" name to that list doesn't mean it is an established name. There are many authors who have given objects a name in their books or papers and I have made up a few names myself over years of observing. None of those are appropriate for titles of the articles though.--Kalsermar 20:57, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I think this page should be moved to M74, like IC 447 or most of the other ICs. Just a thought... --M1ss1ontomars2k4 05:04, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

text: That would be me, I removed a lot of them on that list but not from the articles. I will do that as I come across them. Thank you for doing this one. A user (now banned) has been adding them left right and center, even nicknames for objects he himself came up with! Vacuum Cleaner Galaxy anyone?)--Kalsermar 16:05, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Galaxy: Exploring the milky way says the size is 90 thousand LY.
should I put this in?
Mocha2007 (talk) 17:57, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Galaxy: Exploring the milky way 

message: The file :File:NGC 628.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:NGC 628.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 03:04, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:NGC 628.jpg]]
Talk:Chinotto

message: Whilst agreeing with the majority of the article, I must refute the reassurgance of Chinotto.  I returned from Rome where I found it difficult to obtain in bars & restaurants.
Ian c McGlennon —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.100.250.226 (talk • contribs)  18:19, 14 March 2006  (UTC)
:Umm, try any supermarket.  ProhibitOnions  (T) 13:17, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment moved to talk page

message: Merger with the tree seems like a no-brainer to me. FlagSteward (talk) 21:06, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: San Pellegrino Chinotto is now available in Canada as well. It disappeared off shelves for about six months but was reintroduced recently. In general the list of chinotto beverages available worldwide should be expanded. 69.172.94.21 (talk) 06:21, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Canadian drinks other than Brio