Talk:Leucorchestris arenicola

message: What has this article got to do with cocktails with gin?
Athene noctua 22:03, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: For some reason the German version of this article has much more material including pictures and english language references http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leucorchestris_arenicola  We need to get some of this into the English version of the article.  Rifter0x0000 (talk) 12:39, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: German Article

message: If you read the paper cited in this article by Henschel nowhere does it say that male spiders have to drum the right message in order to mate with female spiders. It in fact says that male spiders drum to signal other male spiders and the author does not state that male spiders eat other male spiders if they don't "drum right". The author states that very little drumming is conducted between male and female spiders.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.51.145.103 (talk) 06:18, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Leucorchestris arenicola. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091023072755/http://insects.tamu.edu/research/collection/hallan/Acari/0ReportHi.htm to http://insects.tamu.edu/research/collection/hallan/Acari/0ReportHi.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: "Male white lady spiders will travel more than a mile in one night searching for a mate." But in the referece it says: "In 16 observed complete excursions, male spiders walked 51 m (median, range 16–91 m) from their burrow along a path of 134 m (42–314 m)". Klaus D. Peter, Germany.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:E1:71B:B00:1C80:E40E:D9E4:971F (talk) 19:33, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: This is incorrect

message: Hi! This is a very well-written page! It covers a lot of topics and all the information is well explained. I fixed a few grammar mistakes and added a few hyperlinks. I have noticed that your in-text citation format is not consistent throughout the page. Sometimes you left a space after the sentence and before the cite while sometimes you did not; and sometimes you left a space between the citation and the following sentence while sometimes you didn’t. I helped change some of those citations. A few more places I found that need to be revised: 1) The last sentence in both male-male interactions and female-male interactions sections, you might have forgotten to cite. 2) In the reproduction section, you said “The mean size for clutches was found to be about 76.” You forgot to include the unit for it.
A few more suggestions I have: 1) In the description section, you talked about the differences between males and females. I think it would be good to mention if it is sexual dimorphism. 2) At the foraging section, you briefly mentioned cannibalism. I would be interested to learn more about it. You can expand more on their non-sexual cannibalism behaviors.
Arielfeng (talk) 12:51, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments and edits from a Behavioral Ecology student

message: "Their bodies are larger than 5 in (13 cm) and their legs are nearly twice the size of the body at 10 in (25 cm).". There's no way they are that big. It would make them the largest huntsman species after Heteropoda Maxima (with a 3x larger body size). Yet you can't find a single picture online where they look bigger than the palm of a hand. The weight value given also doesn't match with the size. Someone must have confused cm with inches. 31.164.142.149 (talk) 21:38, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the source used is clearly wrong – it seems to be a blog, and shouldn't be used. I've made a quick fix using a reliable source from the article. Peter coxhead (talk) 23:17, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong size