Talk:Digraphs and trigraphs (programming)

message: I very much doubt that this phrase "replaces all occurrences" is correct (my emphasis). For example,
it should not replace occurences of that sequence within strings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Njh@bandsman.co.uk (talk • contribs) 11:26, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akihabara (talk • contribs) 05:31, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sadly. This is a prime example of design by committee — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlbertCahalan~enwiki (talk • contribs) 06:46, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  replaces all occurrences 

message: Is the \? escape really standard, or just typical? Might there be a compiler that maps it to the 0xfe character or similar? AlbertCahalan 04:06, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  escape 

message: Should something be added about the more notorious uses of trigraphs (i.e. obfuscation)? Amcfreely 04:07, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  IOCCC 

message: When were trigraphs introduced? Do they only apply to ISO C, for instance? Have any other languages adopted them? --82.46.154.93 03:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Applicability 

message: The bit at the bottom on digraphs lists "%:" as a digraph for "#", and "%:%:" as a digraph for "##". Surely the second one is simply two adjacent digraphs?--NeilMitchell 19:55, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "A digraph [...] must always represent a full token by itself." # and ## are different tokens. --62.224.99.108 14:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant digraph 

message: I don't know Perl, but the Perl section does not seem to deal with di- and trigraph substitution, it's rather more a list of operators. What are those supposed di- and trigraphs replaced with? 221.187.58.252 (talk) 07:01, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perl section 

message: Are escape characters digraphs in LaTeX ?
Snide (talk) 15:05, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  LaTeX section 

message: Trigraphs in TeX use a character with category code seven, which is doubled and then followed by one or two additional characters, this is treated as if the corresponding character is found in input. Unlike C, the TeX trigraphs can be very useful sometimes. --zzo38(✉) 04:56, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  TeX trigraphs 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved to Digraphs and trigraphs (programming). Consensus that the topic is not widely described as "multigraphs", but also that it is not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for "digraphs and trigraphs"; thus, consensus emerged around "Digraphs and trigraphs (programming)" as a compromise that avoided both issues. I also see a rough consensus to establish the plain title Digraphs and trigraphs as an independent DAB page rather than a redirect to Multigraph (disambiguation). (closed by non-admin page mover)  ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Digraphs and trigraphs →  – With Digraphs and trigraphs redirected to Multigraph (disambiguation).
Represents a particular application of the Multigraph (orthography) concept, while I think it's fine for the two articles to have the scope they have. Remsense诉 02:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Computing has been notified of this discussion. Remsense诉 02:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2 March 2024