Talk:Margaret Chan

message: The current image was uploaded with no copyright information and will probably be deleted within the week. Can anyone find a free image that we can use? Nishkid64 16:35, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks K ideas for uploading a new image of Margaret Chan (one that is actually with copyright information and won't be deleted). Nishkid64 01:55, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: I think Chan got her BA in Home Economics at The Hong Kong Institute of Education, but the cited source says she got her degree at Western's Brescia University College.  Either way, she didn't get her BA in Home Economics at the University of Western Ontario...--Ivy ST 07:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  BA in Home Econ 

message: First of all, I would like to thank the admin Nishkid64 for taking an interest in the article about Dr Margaret Chan even the effect of User: Nishkid64's action was to delete the whole section I spent a lot of time in creating.
I would like to make a note that the tone in the comments accompanying Nishkid64's action do seems harsh, "The whole section on the SARS response was taken from government source. Don't copy word-for-word, but summarize what happened!"
First, I wish to, for the record, make a distinction between, "taken from government source" and "quoting and referencing legislative council sources". "taken" seems to imply simple copying without proper reference nor thought in the action of inserting the text. I am, of course, in very much disagreement of the implications.
The reason for the original intend of the direct quoted reference was to avoid any potential appearance of whether the "summary" was fair compare to the original report text. Upon further reflection, I have somewhat rewritten the section and hope this will read better.
Again, I appreciate the comment by User: Nishkid64 even though the comment attached to the text removal seems a bit harsh. Well, we are all learning, I suppose.
– Kempton    "Ideas are the currency of the future."  - a quote by Kevin Roberts 16:08, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Harsh? I used an exclamation mark at the end of my comment just in case you decided to add it back. My only complaint was the way the whole section was written; it had appeared that the section was a direct read from those legislative council sources. I totally think the section was appropriate, and I appreciate your work, and I apologize for failing to leave a note on your talk page regarding my reasons for removing that section from the article. Currently, I would like to see that section written in encyclopedic form. In this particular section, I would like it if you could summarize in your own words, using the sources as references for your additions to the page. Some things stick out like, "In addition, Dr CHAN..." CHAN? Couldn't you just summarize what the assessment had established? I'll try to make some corrections, as well. Nishkid64 17:35, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

text: The current version still reads a bit too long and verbatim to me. Can we condense the reactions to her record during the SARS outbreak even more? A general assessment should be good enough for this section, and individual remarks can serve as references to the main text -- definitely no need to paraphrase so many individuals' voices here. (btw, I'm not an admin :) --John Seward 15:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Condensed and summarised. I have removed the quotes from legislators as they are supposed to be reflected already in the report by the legislative council cited as reference in the criticism paragraph. --John Seward 08:10, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks a lot, John. =) Nishkid64 20:13, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: the removal of "Handling of the SARS outbreak (Legislative Council of Hong Kong report)" section 

message: Why does her Chinese name have four Chinese characters instead of three? Badagnani (talk) 22:56, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 4 Chinese characters

message: "Chan's moral integrity has been publicly challenged; the WHO definition of pandemic was relaxed in 2009."
This statement needs to be fleshed out if it is to be included, it is nonsensical right now.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.193.142.111 (talk) 03:10, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Moral Integrity" 

message: Hello sir how are you. Shafiq Ahmad (talk) 18:45, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussing polio issues. 

message: The claim in the lead that she is "Hong Kong-Canadian" is not supported by the source cited. The source says she is from the People's Republic of China. Studying for a few years in country X does not automatically make one X-ian. If she is referred to as Canadian in reliable sources, it would be good to add it into the article. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 16:23, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There is also a source in the infobox, which I have copied over to the lead. _dk (talk) 17:45, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That source also doesn't say that she is Canadian - it says that she studied in Canada for a few years and then returned to Hong Kong. That's not the same as being identified as "Canadian". --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 09:03, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: From the relevant passage of that source, I quote:
 _dk (talk) 19:40, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see, missed that bit when I was reading the article, my bad. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 09:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Margaret Chan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061019233426/http://time.blogs.com/global_health/2006/07/whos_next_at_wh.html to http://time.blogs.com/global_health/2006/07/whos_next_at_wh.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:16, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Margaret Chan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090503152953/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=&art_id=7058&sid=&con_type=1&d_str=20040710&sear_year=2004 to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=&art_id=7058&sid=&con_type=1&d_str=20040710&sear_year=2004
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:45, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot (talk) 14:06, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wang Longde. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Zanhe (talk) 19:35, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Wang Longde" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: === NPOV dispute over section titled "Director of Health in Hong Kong, 1994–2003" ===
This section has a lot of newspaper sources used as references and the content appears written in a very sensationalist manner perhaps reflecting the newspaper sources' writing, the content appears like it is from very sensationalized newspaper stories from the time it happened, this section really needs more sober reliable sources to verify claims here made by those newspaper stories; it has been years since this time so sources other than newspaper stories are available now.
News like AFP and Politico are not tabloids and are not sensational. While more recent sources would be appreciated, a lack of them does not automatically create an NPOV problem. DifferenceTone (talk) 23:52, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral Point of View dispute for the section titled "Director of Health in Hong Kong, 1994–2003" and for the section titled "Director-General of WHO, 2006–2017" 

message: This section has a lot of newspaper sources used as references and the content appears written in a very sensationalist manner perhaps reflecting the newspaper sources' writing, the content appears like it is from very sensationalized newspaper stories from the time it happened, this section really needs more sober reliable sources to verify claims here made by those newspaper stories; it has been years since this time so sources other than newspaper stories are available now.
News like AFP and Politico are not tabloids and are not sensational. While more recent sources would be appreciated, a lack of them does not automatically create an NPOV problem. DifferenceTone (talk) 23:52, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV dispute over section titled "Director of Health in Hong Kong, 1994–2003" 

message: This section has sensationalized sounding content typical of newspaper media that is being used as sources here and the content makes accusations that she was criticized but does not say who or what organizations in particular did the accusations. Like the previous section mentioned this section also needs more sober reliable sources to verify claims here and like the section above it has been years since this time so sources other than newspaper stories are available.
In fact the sources do cite the organizations accusing Chan, and news like AFP and Politico are not tabloids and are not sensational While more recent sources would be appreciated, a lack of them does not automatically create an NPOV problem. DifferenceTone (talk) 23:51, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV dispute over section titled "Director-General of WHO, 2006–2017"