Talk:Thematic Apperception Test

message: Is the inclusion of disseration research in the criticism section warranted?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.181.195.56 (talk) 19:01, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dissertation Research? 

message: i can't remember the name of the novel, but there was a robin cook book about a doctor whose boy is an evil genius with his own laboratory who slowly poisons his brother and another family member. the boy was given a thematic apperception test which he responded to several images shown in the book.
edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutation_(novel) here it is 173.32.146.219 (talk) 02:00, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  robin cook 

message: This article's title appears in violation of WP:NAME.  Any special reason why we are not adhering to it? Garycompugeek (talk) 19:47, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: My reading (and I may be wrong) of this convention is that a subject that is conventionally referred to with all the words of its title capitalised should also be named that way in Wikipedia (the examples given are John Wayne and Art Nouveau). A quick Google search suggests that this subject fits the same pattern - the TAT when fully spelled out is almost always rendered as Thematic Apperception Test. Hugh Mason (talk • contribs 10:30, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes that is the exception.  Thankyou. Garycompugeek (talk) 16:42, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title case 

message: I was intrigued by the 2005 study referred to in the criticisms section and wonder if someone who knows this field could help to put these words "... reproducing a Bellak 10 card set photographically and performing an outcome study" into everyday language, or could rephrase them in a way that links to other articles, so that a lay reader can make sense of what is clearly an interesting point?  Hugh Mason (talk • contribs 15:22, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms 

message: In the book Flowers for Algernon, Charlie does take a TAT, but it is vague, and he comments that stories are lies, and he will not lie about people he has never met. The section is page four, Progress Report 4.
Also, is the aspect of the story about the Rorschach relevant? I think that it can be removed.
WGE1 (talk) 20:20, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flowers For Algernon 

message: Substituted at 08:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Uncontested RM (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 16:27, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thematic apperception test →  – Official name uses upper case. See thread "Title case" above. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Psychology has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 February 2024