lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Language delay

message: I've trimmed out most of the repetitive verbiage and tried to put in structure, though it still lacks citations and needs a child psychologist or similar to fix it Chrismorey (talk) 08:33, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: one of the problems is the reliance on dated citations, and being inline with more recent research. Such as DSM5 published this year. dolfrog (talk) 13:10, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit 

message: Hello everyone,
I am working on this page for a class project. I have made my updates in my sandbox and I'm looking for feedback for the wiki community! Here is the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:NourhanMesbah/sandbox
Let me know what you think. Thanks!
-NourhanMesbah (talk) 04:03, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: This article is great! one observation -- I wonder if this section is a bit redundant with the later sections devoted to presentation. My impression is that a couple of different presentations are mentioned in this section and perhaps it could be removed or changed to describe different patterns of development? cmacaulay970 (talk) 18:50, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree, I think what could be added would be when children lose an ability to talk that they used to have (regression) which is usually a sign something is wrong. just a suggestion! CalciferoI (talk) 06:13, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  comment on the "language development in language delay" section under "Language Delay" heading 

message: You guys have done a great job! A suggestion--I'm not sure if this is a formatting thing or if there is actually no citation, but under the communicative deficits section, many of your red flags do not have citations.HNoorul12 (talk) 15:20, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: comment on the "early signs and symptoms (red flags) section
Talk:Ferenc Joachim

message: Just to remind contributors that naming conventions say we use the most common English form of a name, including English conventions about family/given name order. DJ Clayworth 17:45, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello there, I'm rather new to this, so I hope I'm doing it right. Up until now my edits have been mostly minor grammatical fixes and so forth. I've just done sort of a major overhaul on this article, cutting gigantic swaths of material I found pointless or redundant. This includes removing many photos of Joachim's extended family - I just couldn't see the point of this being, like, dude's personal family photo album.
If any of these edits are inappropriate, please let me know. I've left the footnotes section as is, because frankly I don't know what to do about it.
Jessicapierce 18:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  big deletions 

message: Regarding the infobox request at , I see Fuhghettaboutit has changed to using  here. See that link for the documentation. And see Wikipedia:List of infoboxes for many but not all infoboxes ( appears to be missing there). There is no infobox specific to painters. PrimeHunter (talk) 15:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you both for your help. I rejected Infobox Artist after a trial because it actively suppressed too much relevant data. From a quick look (i.e. Turner) it seems Infobox Person is also acceptable. I'll be working on this article for several days yet in case anything new crops up. Thank you again, Shir-El too (talk) 20:01, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 
Talk:Alter Ego (1986 video game)

message: I changed the game category from 'simulation' to 'RPG'.  The game didn't really simulate any sort of outside world, and like any RPG it had an unfolding story that the player would play through.  And the player actually had stats that he could advance and utilize.  Tempshill 18:48, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  RPG 

message: I'm curious, should there be a reference to the online version? http://www.theblackforge.net/index.html This one doesn't work for me, but one of the mirrors work, and it seems like just about the same game, with different icons in some cases. It's perhaps a clone, but surely deserves mention? -- Zalethon (Talk) 21:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Online version
Talk:I'll Get You

message: I've heard it on the Original mono 45. It is there. :)
:That's not enough. Do you have a source that mentions it? ~ trialsanderrors 05:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goof remark added. 

message: Found a 45 in a second hand store.Is it worth anything?
Might be rich —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 125.238.16.189 (talk) 21:08, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  she loves you/I,ll get you 45 

message: McCartney calls this a 50/50 composition.
Is this just one of the occasions where Lennon's claim is just accepted as the truth?
Ian MacDonald speculates that Paul may have started it, and John contributed the middle.
So what is this opposite assumption based on?
John even said in the Playboy interview: "That was Paul and and me trying to write a song and it didn't work out".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.240.143 (talk) 23:29, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primarily by Lennon? 

message: I know there's no place in the article for this, having never been officially discussed and all, but it seems obvious to me that this song is about anal sex.  Just thought I'd mention it.  Raluboon (talk) 08:56, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metaphorically speaking
Talk:Manannán mac Lir

message: There is a problem here. in the sentence that says he is not related to Lir from children of lir clicking on the link "lir" takes you to the page about the sea god lir who WAS his father.  Do we need disambiguation? Stblndr 17:59, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Lord, no. That sentence, if it means anything, means that Manannán doesn't play a part in Oidheadh Chlainne Lir. Which means that he may be the same person, or not. I certainly don't see that as reason for siphoning off into a disambiguation page and two different articles since, to all intents and purposes, nothing is known about the Lir who is Manannán's father. (If he is indeed different from the character in Oidheadh Chloinne Lir...) QuartierLatin1968  18:36, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2005 posts

message: Lady Gregory doesn't identify the source of her tales, and it would be nice to establish them (or alternatively treat Lady Gregory as a topic apart from the Old Irish corpus). 
It isn't clear if "Manannan at Play" has any actual basis in the Old Irish literature; especially the identification of Manannan with the bodach figure appears to be Middle Irish, if not modern. 
Or perhaps there is an Old Irish source for this, but the article doesn't give it, and I couldn't find it. --dab (𒁳) 10:00, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Lady Gregory

message: See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Ireland-related_articles#Derry/Londonderry - "Use Derry for the city and County Londonderry for the county in articles." I will revert accordingly.Alekksandr (talk) 21:56, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: County Londonderry

message: So I am thinking about adding a more specific section to the article about Manannan's influence in the "Voyage of Bran" considering the fact that it's one of the first times we see him documented in historical literature, as well as going into a little more depth about just what he did in the different literature we see him in. I will be using both "The Waves of Manannan" by Charles W. MacQuarrie and "The Place of Manannan Mac Lir in Irish Mythology" by David B. Spaa.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by A.benson99 (talk • contribs) 23:56, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  2021 Addition plans 

message: crane-bagの持ち主はConaire MórではなくConaire Cóemではないでしょうか。
詩には”Ro codail Conaire cáom”と書かれています。
[Duanaire Finn Poem VIII "The Crane-bag", ed. MacNeill (1908)  p. 22,]
The owner of the crane-bag is probably Conaire Cóem, not Conaire Mór.
The poem says "Ro codail Conaire cáom".
[Duanaire Finn Poem VIII "The Crane-bag", ed. MacNeill (1908), p. 22, in.] 空瓶 (talk) 07:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The owner of the crane-bag
Talk:Felons and Revolutionaries

message: "The track listing on the back cover of some pressings does not state the song "Fuck tha Police" as existing on the record. This is most likely due to a typographical error or the producers had used too much of the space on the back of the album to the artwork."
Uh, no possibility whatsoever that the record label didn't want such a controversial phrase on the cover?  That's what I assumed the reason was.  It certainly wasn't due to lack of space, as there's plenty of room in the yellow box with the song titles; it could easily have contained one more.  And an error is hard to believe, because the song isn't named anywhere inside the lyric booklet either; it's just listed as "Track 8" and the lyrics are not included.  I'm pretty sure it was on purpose, and probably not the band's idea. 174.46.172.13 (talk) 09:58, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That, or maybe they didn't have the royalties sorted out to include the N.W.A. cover, but went ahead and put it on there anyway without a title. --Crimson Bleeding Souls (talk) 01:31, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Track 8
Talk:Harmacy

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 18:40, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''
Talk:Charrúa

message: Charrua -> Charrúa need to be reversed. At the moment the main page is Charrua with a redirect from Charrúa. It should be the other way around. I'd do it myself but I'm afraid of losing the page history. I am happy to fix redirects, though, if someone leaves me a message on my Talk page. Mona-Lynn 23:03, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: I'm uruguayan and I can tell that the correct naming is Charrúa. As for the naming in english, it shouldn't vary because it comes from the spanish name.
--Ernalve 04:39, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charrúa with the accent 

message: There are 676 Charrua in Entre Rios according to 2001 Census.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Anandks007 (talk • contribs) 07:19, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Argentine Census 2001 
Talk:Kristine DeBell

message: I've removed the term "pornstar" from the lede of this article, because it's not actually accurate (sources are equivocal on whether it's reasonable to term "Alice" 'porn' -- I certainly don't), and because it's not reflective of her career, by weight or volume... and because due to those things, it probably runs afoul of WP:BLP.--Baylink (talk) 18:28, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks, the phrase "pornstar" is really quite POV, in almost all cases, and particularly in hers. however, "alice" IS explicit, and intended to arouse (its not an art film), so its porn, though not as "porny" as what we have now, of course.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:30, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Pornstar" 
Talk:XIII (Mushroomhead album)

message: I was hoping this page would have some idea what the **** is up with the "laughing baby" sounds that constitute much of the second half of the track "Thirteen" (excluding the "Crazy" bonus song on the same track).  I don't know if the sounds are actually made by infants, but that's what they sound like.  It's freakish, and hardly fits with the rest of the album, so I'm hoping at some point somebody asked the band what it was about and that someone here can track the reference down.
Wpell (talk) 08:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Album Content
Talk:Miriam Hyman

message: I do actually think this article should seriously be kept, though this person may at first seem not notable in an encyclopedia Miriam Hyman was actually, according to one source, a popular picture editor. This page,  has quite a bit of detail about this person - with this information added to the article I think its well worth keeping it in its own article rather than deleting the information all together or redirecting it to the London Bombings article. — Wackymacs 18:59, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: * I've just added more information on Miriam, and an external links section. — Wackymacs 19:17, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep, Delete or Redirect? 

message: This article was recently nominated for deletion but no consensus was reached: the article was redirected as only one person in the discussion said keep.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Miriam Hyman for the archived discussion -- Francs2000 | Talk  16:35, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD discussion
Talk:Manual call point

message: I want to include some sort of reference in here that these are mostly European, but can't exactly figure out how to work that in, and also, don't have enough information to substantiate exactly how far-reaching these devices are.  I know that these aren't used in the US or Canada, with manual pull stations used in those countries.  Schuminweb 19:21, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I made an article about the manual pull station, and cross-linked it, but still need to do some Europe-ization on this one.  Schuminweb 22:03, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Europe

message: What was this about?

I went ahead and edited it back out for now, since it doesn't go to anything at this point.  Whoever posted this, what were you intending to do?  We can fix it up - that's no problem - but I just don't know what this is going to...  Schuminweb 22:10, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  What was this?
Talk:Jean-Claude Carrière

message: According to the French wikipedia, Carriere was born on September 17, not September 19, 1931. And the German wikipedia says "(* 6. August 1928 in Colombières-sur-Orb, Hérault; † 7. Mai 2005)". So what is it? Eugene van der Pijll 19:27, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: German Wikipedia has in the meantime been corrected although they are still using 19 September as his birth date. Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 17:30, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth 

message: This article has no bibliography despite Carrière being a prolific author. Something you would not suspect if you relied solely on this article. Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 17:36, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Caillou

message: The GoAnimate videos were Caillou gets grounded are still a part of Caillou, and better than the actual series in my opinion. So why not add them? 65.34.40.139 (talk) 16:12, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The Caillou the Grownup viral video should be added as well 90.242.81.10 (talk) 07:44, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

text: Because they're not officially part of the Caillou series; they're made to make fun of Caillou. 2603:6010:8B45:FA00:ED3D:184E:3B8C:D7FB (talk) 18:43, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  We really should add the GoAnimate videos. 

message: Remove the word "was" in the sentence "She was never appeared in Season 3", in Deedee's bio. 2603:6010:8B45:FA00:ED3D:184E:3B8C:D7FB (talk) 18:41, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for editing it! :-) 2603:6010:8B45:FA00:D03A:E3F0:9F1A:371E (talk) 04:53, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  by M.Bitton – Recoil16 (talk) 23:40, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 August 2023 

message: The Caillou reboot series cannot release in 2023; it's now 2024, so we should omit the "in 2023" portion. 2603:6010:8B00:44FF:1D47:80FD:E5D8:1943 (talk) 22:48, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Sam Sailor 19:16, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Always glad to make a good suggestion. 🤗 2603:6010:8B00:44FF:18F9:4BF7:536:4D47 (talk) 04:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 January 2024 

message: In the Characters section, under Clementine, it says "Caillou at Daycare" but then under Leo it says "Caillou Goes to Day Care", please fix this inconsistency in that subsection.  70.50.199.125 (talk) 06:13, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 March 2024
Talk:Genealogical Office

message: I'm removing the reference to Slevin designing the European flag, as it seems to be thoroughly debunked here , and he gets no mention at ,  Lozleader 07:50, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that the removal is warranted by the sources that you cite. Well done, Loz. :) --Eva db 08:50, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  European flag 

message: The next problem being that the title of the office is the Genealogical Office, as provided in various statutes of the Oireachtas.
Just to make things more interesting their notepaper gives the title: Oifig Ghinealais / Genealogical Office, while the Chief Herald's busines card gives  Oifig Phríomh-Aralt na hÉireann / Office of the Chief Herald of Ireland
Which makes for rather a long opening sentence:
The Office of the Chief Herald of Ireland (Oifig Phríomh-Aralt na hÉireann), officially the Genealogical Office (Oifig Ghinealais), (sometimes incorrectly called the Office of Arms) is the Republic of Ireland's authority on all heraldic matters relating to Ireland and is located at the National Library of Ireland. 
Actually its part of the NLI, but has its own building on the same street (and of course used to be in Dublin Castle, so the end of the sentence nedds rewriting as well..
Eeek!
Perhaps a split between the office and the officer...?
Lozleader 14:53, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genealogical Office 

message: This seems to be error or at least outdated. According to the Irish government, the Office of the Chief Herald is not a part of the Genealogical Office. Rather, the Genealogical Office is a former name of the Office of the Chief Herald .  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  04:05, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  In error, outdated?
Talk:Callaloo

message: I'm confused by the picture of okra.  Explain? --Gruepig 06:59, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: While you can put okro in callaloo, it's not primary.  I restored the original images.  Guettarda 07:08, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.. the article states "Callaloo is almost always made with okra" so i changed those three small images with one small image. I don't mind the revert. I just thought maybe one image might look better than three on the page. sikander 18:16, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Okra? 

message: Hello all... 
An image used in the article, specifically :Image:Amaranthus spinosus c.jpg, has a little bit of a licensing issue.  The image was uploaded back when the rules around image uploading were less restrictive.  It is presumed that the uploader was willing to license the picture under the GFDL license but was not clear in that regard.  As such, the image, while not at risk of deletion, is likely not clearly licensed to allow for free use in any future use of this article.  If anyone has an image that can replace this, or can go take one and upload it, it would be best.
You have your mission, take your camera and start clicking.--Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:51, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image needs replacement
Talk:List of world folk-epics

message: Is the Aeneid really considered an folk-epic? It was written, very deliberately, by a single author.
::Well, most of these are, really.  What bothers me more is that novels, sagas, operas, and a lot of other stuff has been lumped together as "epic".  Why not include comic books, movies, and television shows?  An epic is supposed to be a poem -- to be reluctant to call a grand prose work an "epic" is not to denigrate it, but simply to recognize that it is in a different genre.  Perhaps there should be a section for "prose epics".
::::IMO, the critical part of a folk-epic is the 'folk' aspect. I've always found that the best writing transcends the boundaries between prose and poetry, so if a people's weltanschauung plays a dominant role in the work, specific points of style like the distinction between prose and poetry matter a whole lot less. Single-authorship I'd say is a bigger hurdle, but even there, as long as it can be established that the work exemplifies the writer's culture's weltanschauung, I have no problem calling it a folk-epic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.132.173.196 (talk) 07:18, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should Terje Vigen be here? NorwegianMarcus 17:12, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terje Vigen 

message: I've added in Le Morte d'Arthur. Some might argue that it is not strictly an epic, as it was written in prose rather than poetry; but I see other prose epics already on the list (such as the Mabinogion, or Njal's Saga), so I trust that's OK??
Drjamesaustin (talk) 02:25, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prose epics 

message: I'm removing
Tunkashila, an American Indian epic in English by Gerald Hausman 
from this section. English is not an indigenous American language, and there's no mention of Tunkashila in the Gerald Hausman article. DavidCh0 (talk) 12:52, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  American languages
Talk:Axel F (Crazy Frog song)

message: What were you expecting?
----
When I saw this on german news, it was presented as "wow this is interesting, a ringtone song actually becomming number 1!!" But is the ringtone really connected to the song? The only way that would be possible is if the ringtone was for more advanced phones that could playback an entire waveform sample of the entire song. Surely a MIDI based synthesized or wavetable ringtone of the crazy frog version would be indistinguishable from the original.
: Yeah, that's the same angle they used in the UK, too. I imagine the ringtone is just a few seconds of the song. BillyH 23:56, 29 October 2005 (UTC)