Talk:Municipal broadband

message: The New Orleans network was bought? I can't confirm; in fact, the following widely cited article says just the opposite. DanConnolly (talk) 16:41, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  (untitled) 

message: How can we have an article about Municipal broadband and not include Wireless Minneapolis?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.17.68.195 (talk) 00:00, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: On the other hand, why is there an entire subsection on Bristol, VA? Since there's already a link to an article on Cities with Municipal Wireless Networks, shouldn't that section be removed? dweinberger 12:57, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wireless Minneapolis 

message: The Cons section does not provide any references and just poses a barrage of leading questions. If there is going to be a cons section it should be thoroughly researched and cited.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.24.92.108 (talk) 05:14, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 'Cons' Section seems like propoganda 

message: There is no discussion of the ISP fights against muni broadband.  For example the fights they had in longmont colorado to overcome legal restrictions against broadband and the cable company lobbying against it:
http://gigaom.com/2011/10/19/what-a-fight-for-broadband-tells-us-about-democracy/
:I added a brief blurb to the controversies section and several citations to support.128.97.68.15 (talk) 01:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  longmont colorado 

message: Most of the controversies section is uncited and seems dubious. I nominated the article for a POV check.  "Technical issues" with muni broadband? 128.97.68.15 (talk) 01:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I added some cited material at the top.  I'd argue we cite or remove the uncited material at the bottom.128.97.68.15 (talk) 01:11, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I ended up just deleted that section - it's been there for years and there doesn't seem to be any movement on making it sourced. I think it's better to not have the bloat there, and if anyone wants to find sources and restore it we'll all be grateful. Aerothorn (talk) 19:23, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  pov check 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Municipal broadband. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140712215131/http://connectedplanetonline.com/news/Broadband-Stimulus-post-game-recap-1005/ to http://connectedplanetonline.com/news/Broadband-Stimulus-post-game-recap-1005/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: I was unaware of this article. I moved content from an old version of Multichannel television in the United States to Fiber to the premises in the United States. This content might fit here. I'm not sure just where to put it.— Vchimpanzee •  talk • contributions •  14:29, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specific examples