lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor

message: Is this protein a dimer, or is the picture just intended to show 2 different views of the same thing? Could the image's author add a caption to the GM-CSF article page to clarify? Thanks. Xenobiologista (talk) 22:54, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like an attempt at parallel viewing stereogram but the viewing angles are so different I can't get tmem to fuse properly. Rod57 (talk) 18:16, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protein structure 

message: I don't really understand what is controversial about that part? Drug development companies always pay for trials(yeah, no one pay for them) and report results in press releases and publications. That is common practice. FDA do it job in estimating drug performance and approve or not approve particular drug for further studies and use as a treatment. TestPilot 05:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the controversy stems from the inherent conflict of interest:  the person who co-owns the patent on the drug is also the same person who is the lead author of a study saying the drug is highly effective.  That is, the study he wrote, which is supposed to be objective, scientific and unbiased, would likely result in increased sales of his drug, which makes him more money. Katalaveno 18:53, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Is there evidence of a notable controversy or can we change the section title to Crohns disease and just report the study findings if they are significant ? Rod57 (talk) 18:10, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: The article cited for 'recent studies of GMC-CSF' in HIV patients does not show anything HIV related.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.168.241.142 (talk) 12:14, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. As best I could tell without laboring over it, it seems like the wrong article being cited. I tagged it (). Quercus solaris (talk) 03:04, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the heads up.  I found two sources () that document the clinical trial of GMC-CSF as an HIV vaccine adjuvant and have edited the text accordingly. Boghog (talk) 09:05, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  GMC-CSF and HIV link 
Category talk:Knights Grand Cross of the Order of St Michael and St George

message: Prince Abdol Hossein Mirza Farman-Farma (Qajar) and his son Prince Firuz Mirza Farman-Farmaian (Qajar) both held the Order of Knights Grand Cross of the Order of St. Micheal and St. George (GCMG), but they are not listed here. Ab Farman 10:07, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prince Abdol Hossein Mirza Farman-Farma (Qajar)
Talk:Flange

message: I'd like if the ASME/ANSI section actually described what the standards specify, and what purpose they serve. Ianbicking (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 06:15, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ASME/ANSI standards

message: Article makes no reference to the fact it is mainstream slang (UK) for lady parts.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.254.72.88 (talk) 22:23, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: To get to that sense of the word, you have to click through the hatnote ("For other uses, see Flange (disambiguation)") to the disambiguation page Flange (disambiguation), then click through the Wiktionary link there ("Look up flange in Wiktionary, the free dictionary") to arrive at the dictionary definition listing all senses of the word. This is the intentional pathway (no error here). Of course, you probably already knew that, and your comment here was simply intended to yank our flanges, figuratively speaking. In which case, you have succeeded, good sir. — ¾-10 23:54, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Other senses of the word

message: See the discussion at Talk:Comparison of train and tram tracks#A lot of nonsense Peter Horn User talk 23:13, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  About flanges 

message: I'm just curious what lead you to this page. 146.90.185.66 (talk) 20:48, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow, why are you here?
Talk:Nora Buchanan

message: I've reverted the move to the clunky name Nora Hanen Buchanan; obviously the editor was anxious for a name change but Nora Buchanan has some edit history and would be an assisted move. Since everything links to Nora Hanen at the moment, it should remain there while we discuss the possibilities. Nora Buchanan does feel right, but they literally got married yesterday, who knows if it will last??— TAnthonyTalk 05:41, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As she was Nora Buchanan when the series ended in 2013, the name should be Nora Buchanan, but Wikipedia will not let me move it. Bgsu98 (talk) 04:50, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below.  Dekimasuよ! 14:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Nora Hanen →  – Character remarried and was Nora Buchanan when the series ended in 2013, and was still Nora Buchanan when she appeared as a guest character on General Hospital in 2017. Nora Buchanan was the character's most common name during the length of her tenure on One Life to Live. Bgsu98 (talk) 18:04, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 April 2022
Talk:Room and board

message: This phrase ("Room & Board") has a lot of meaning. I'm surprised that the article for it is so short. Please expand!
:expand it yourself! -64.112.227.142 (talk) 00:18, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Is it true that the "board" comes from centuries ago when people were too poor to afford tables, so the would offer a room to stay in and a "board" to put on your lap to eat your food off of? 122.49.159.164 (talk) 19:30, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  etymology 

message: Most United States county states charge room and board after defendants' jail stays (mainly since the 1994 election). How about some discussion in this article? Heff01 (talk) 02:46, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  US county jails
Talk:Facial nerve

message: Should definitely be merged. It's the same darn thing. Geekish 05:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged the smaller of these. Klbrain (talk) 21:11, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: This injection anesthetizes the distribution of the infra-orbital nerve as it emerges from the infra-orbital foramen.
Firstly, this mechanism of facial palsy should not be termed Bell's Palsy, which has a specific meaning (i.e. viral).
Secondly, I have not heard of this injection causing a facial palsy. An inferior alveolar nerve block placed too posteriorly may deposit local anesthetic into the substance of the parotic gland, through which the 5 branches of the facial nerve run. It is the injection which many textbooks refer to as causing a facial palsy.
Therefore, I am reverting the article to how it was before. Lesion (talk) 12:03, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Infra-orbital block
Talk:Sing! (competition)

message: Why is "SING!" capitalized if it's not an acronym? If this is a stylistic affection, it needs to be noted in the lead. For example, at entry to Marvel Comics' S.H.I.E.L.D., in a reference to the adversarial organization HYDRA, it says, "Despite that name's capitalization per Marvel's official spelling, HYDRA is not an acronym but a reference to the mythical monster, symbolizing the organization's claim of growing stronger the more it is wounded." -- Tenebrae 05:51, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know why SING! has always been capitalized, or why the exclamation point is used, so I can't write anything verifiable about this. It's just always been done that way. (At least for the shows - you will notice the film dropped both the capitalization and the exclamation point). And thanks for the other changes you made. Simon12 14:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Explanation needed

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved to Sing! (competition). (non-admin closure)  Jenks24 (talk) 08:28, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: SING! →  – MOS:ALLCAPS Trivialist (talk) 01:50, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 November 2023
Talk:Twenty-eight (card game)

message: Is there is trump card when we say thani (adi) ?
Can you please explain? ??
Yes, there is a trump suit. The difference is that when you call thani you automatically go first and you can play the trump suit imedialtly if you annouce that it is the trump suit before the next person puts in his card.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Geestin (talk • contribs) 18:19, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: After everyone has seen their eight cards, the final bidder or the bidder's partner may increase the bid if they wish, but if they do so the new bid must be at least 24.
Can only the bidder or the bidder's partner increase the bid? Can't anyone bid for 24+ after all eight cards have been dealt? --Jairodz (talk) 11:39, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rule 

message: This article gives an external reference to a page on Pagat.com. While that is fine, this article has many discrepancies against the given source.
Jarmihi (talk) 04:21, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Many Inaccuracies 

message: There is a major problem with way the article is written. For Example, "Notes that if a situation is reached during the first phase in which the bidder has no trumps in hand " under the second phase is not a proper sentence.
123.63.207.221 (talk) 10:16, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  English 

message: There is another popular variation of this game played in south India.  It is called something that translates to game of doubles.
Details: Jack and nine are only high in the trump suit.
Scoring for the match is based on the trump suit that was declared, which may have been doubled, redoubled, or re-redoubled, with individual hands having a target for defenders.
There is a separate game mode where players can cancel trick play and attempt to get a grand slam with a trump suit of their choice.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.104.3.155 (talk) 16:56, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other variation
Talk:I Am Joaquin

message: Made major grammatical & spelling changes to the article, linked to other articles and will soon add outside links, also removed copyvio. -- Librarianofages 05:53, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: changes

message: Who is this Joaquin that the article/poem is referring to? At least get that much in there.VolunteerMarek 03:05, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oy, come on people 
Talk:Natural landscaping

message: Hi, I figured there's a large overlap between the two pages and a combined page would eventually have sufficient size and scope for a GA or FA....What do others think? cheers Cas Liber 06:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have put the voting and discussion on the Native gardening talk page. cheers Cas Liber 10:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merge proposal

message: All content was transferred to the article and some below. Since this "Natural landscaping" covered a broader area than "Native gardening" it made more sense for it to be part of landscaping.  Noles1984 22:13, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I hate those contents boxes some times........will getsome aussie native garden pix soon.Cas Liber 19:53, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: I like this article because I am interested in the use of native plants in landscaping and landscape design but I feel it could be further developed. I feel this page could benefit from a section mentioning seasonality and an expansion on the benefits of landscaping with native plants, particularly when it comes to water conservation. Plantaetitanum (talk) 05:50, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: expansion

message: While this article is very informative, it does need more inline citations to verify the information. SpiritedMichelle (talk) 00:29, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more inline citations
Talk:Kuzushi

message: Removed for a couple of reasons the main one being that its a copy of an opinion given here and therefore qualifies as original research (http://judoforum.com/index.php?showtopic=15482) if not copyright violation (even if the same person entered both).
It applies to a very specific situation and not kuzushi in general and in isolation it gives the mistaken impression that this is what kuzushi is and how it is best applied.  It is quite different from the general consensus.
The feet placement described has some merit when describing lines of weakness but both people are at equal disadvantage and hence it comes down to a contest of strength and flexibility.  Its a great training game for developing the "kuzushi feel"- I'm inspired to use it tonight but it does miss the idea of advantageous body placement.Peter Rehse 04:16, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of Diagram

message: The article implies that kuzushi is a judo concept. I wonder if there is a good source for that? The concept is used in wider aikido circles than only Shodokan, and Wado Ryu karate is to my knowledge not very influenced by judo. I could be wrong, but to my mind it seems this statement is incorrect. Maybe it is better to divide the article into several parts, one more general and one about kuzushi in judo. Otherwise I fear this article will always be in a state of struggle between judo bias and tries to get rid of judo bias. // habj 20:35, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judo bias 
Wikipedia talk:Association of Members' Advocates/IRC

message: Could someone explain here what I would need to do so I can use this IRC chat? I need special software? I need a user name? Thank you! --CyclePat 06:20, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi - we've updated WP:AMAIRC with instructions for how to access #AMA-Wikipedia in your web-browser.  However, should you wish to visit other channels at the same time, or for simple ease of use, it's best to get some IRC software (freeware!).  List of Internet Relay Chat clients gives a list, but the most widely used (on Windows) are probably Chatzilla and mIRC, though there are probably many others in wide use!  I hope this partly answers your question - feel free to ask more! Martinp23 17:26, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: IRC Instructions

message: Is there a way we can figure out, or place a link beside the AMA members that have registered and participate in the Irc at #AMA-Wikipedia. I have registered under CyclePat. Perhaps we should send a quick message to everyone on AMA with the instruction (on their user page) and a trial run "meeting" schedules for a certain date & time (with a link to a table so people can easilly convert the time to their home time). --CyclePat 19:33, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poll/Survey or Protype Test
Talk:Antimycin A

message: This page needs a clean-up and more info. Danshil 06:29, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:US unmanned aircraft

message: Nav template created primarily to replace the hand-done designation sequences. Anytime there's a change, this will make it much easier to update. Akradecki 06:31, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Do you have a source for the Boeing MQ-28 Ghost Bat being a US DOD designation? To my knowledge, the Australian MOD sometimes assigns its own designations, such as with the KC-30 and E-7. Most of the sources for the new designation make clear that this is only for the RAAF. I purposely didn't add the MQ-28 for here that reason, so I'm genuinely curious if there's a source that the US has acknowledged the designation. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 17:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually I don't.  I just saw the Q-28 designation being assigned and assumed it was part of the sequence.  Now that I look into it, I see that it was actually assigned by the RAAF. - ZLEA T\C 17:42, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an easy assumption to make. It's possible that the US will skip the designation as a placeholder, especially as they may by the drone in the future. It's also possible the US will assign the designation to something else. It's already (apparently) done that with two US aircraft in the series, the RQ-20 and MQ-20! BilCat (talk) 18:02, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

text:  See above. BilCat (talk) 21:22, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I wondered about that. I don't have an *official* source yet, but the chart on Designation-Systems which isn't authoriative but has always been accurate before explicitly says the next available US designation is Q-29, so... - The Bushranger One ping only 07:07, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know either. Designation-Systems does list it as an RAAF designation, not US DOD, and I've seen nothing to confirm that the US recognizes the designation. The sources at the time the Australians announced the designation made clear it was official for Australia only, so that's my reasoning for keeping it out for now. BilCat (talk) 07:14, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boeing MQ-28 Ghost Bat
Talk:Billy Meredith

message: Billy Meredith is listed in the article as being the oldest player to play in the F A cup. I removed this statement as it is not correct. Neil McBain was 50 when he lined up for New Brighton in the cup and there may well have been others who have played in the competition when older than 49.
:I corrected this error and added a few footnotes to support the "superstar claim. I also added the link to the hall of fame. There are still lots of details that might be added, and no doubt in November, when the Hall of Fame officially announces the inductees, there will be one or two stories in the press that might give a few extra bits of information that might be added. Paul haynes 13:42, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old 

message: Whats going on there? A lot of detail on his early life and the only information from the 14 year period from 1907 to 1921 is that he played as a guest for Vale against Man U.--EchetusXe (talk) 01:46, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A lot of that would be my fault. I started a rewrite and expansion but never finished it. I've only done up to about 1900. Oldelpaso (talk) 07:28, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1907-1921 
Talk:Three Studies for Figures at the Base of a Crucifixion

message: The dimension of the work "Three Studies for Figures at the Base of a Crucifixion"
by Francis Bacon, 1944, Oil and pastel on board is 37 × 29 inches, 940 × 737 mm, not "37 × 29 cm, 940 × 737 inches".71.231.58.74 06:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dimension

message: Subject. Brownstone999 18:27, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because it is copyrighted.  See the resulting discussion at Talk:Main Page#Fair use image on the main page?.  17Drew 03:33, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  So why is there no picture of this on the main page? is it too graphic? 

message: I am marking this satisfactory at WP:URFA/2020A, but added one cn on a note.  Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk)  01:54, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks v much. Have added a ref to the note, its a well covered friendship between the two painters. Ceoil (talk) 02:54, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:URFA/2020]] notes
Talk:Rob Diament

message: Thanks for this effort, it is an improvement. Unfortunately however, many of the quoted sources do not contain the information that they are quoted for. E.g. the blog entry which is quoted for the trivia section doesn't even mention most of those artist names (not: Matthew Barney, Fred Tomaselli, Wolfgang Tillmans, James Welling and Gilbert and George). And blogs are not regarded as reliable sources anyway. Another example: For the sentence
:Around this time [2000-2002], Diament began to spend time in Brighton collaborating on a number of art, music and performance projects with old Reading school friend Luke Busby and Busby's fellow art student Natasha Kahn, now known for her project Bat for Lashes
this blog entry is quoted, but again it doesn't mention Brighton etc.
Until these fake references are sorted out and the unsourced parts have been referenced, I have marked the article as  and .
Regars, High on a tree (talk) 01:58, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
File talk:Map-Francophonie organisation 2006.png

message: In this map, Ghana is not included...
Ghana is a associated member of the Francophonie since 2006
::Updated :-) Хајдук Еру  (Talk || Cont) 15:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Albania, Greece, Macedonia and Andorra became full-membership member since 2006 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 211.117.32.36 (talk) 08:06, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated Thanks :) Хајдук Еру  (Talk || Cont) 10:52, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  member state 

message: Armenia is now a full member of Francophonie, please update the map. Thanks! - Fedayee (talk) 23:51, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armenia
Talk:Vanderbilt Commodores men's basketball

message: I assume that the copyright violation is the Bob Polk section. I will remove it and that should hopefully resolve any copyright disputes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wpride33 (talk • contribs) 
:Actually, I think a great deal of the article is lifted verbatim from VUcommodores.com.  The first section on the history, for example, is a word-for-word recreation of parts of the page that it links to here. Esrever 22:25, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if you've removed everything that seems to be a copyright violation, feel free to remove the  tag. Esrever 03:01, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problems
Talk:Lust in the Dust

message: How about adding a spoiler warning??? Dollvalley 10:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: For older, less popular films, aggregator scores typically fail to accurately reflect the consensus among critics. The MOS:FILMCRITICS guidelines on Wikipedia advise caution when using aggregators and suggest prioritizing the insights of individual critics. Before the 2000s, platforms like Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic didn't exist, and reviews were predominantly found offline, so for films predating this era, it's better to use other sources, such as print publications where critical consensus may be documented. Maintaining a neutral perspective involves sampling a reasonable balance of these retrospective reviews, which I was able to do after looking for reviews in archived papers. Note that none of the 8 reviews (both positive and negative) I added are cited on the film's Rotten Tomatoes page, and that the 8 reviews cited were all published 2-4 decades after the film was released. Feel free to raise any objections. Mooonswimmer 23:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rotten Tomatoes score