Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Stations

message: Dropping a line here to ask two questions I had when trying to make sense of the NC pages under this project.
The first is this: was Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Australian and New Zealand stations) ever accepted or formally adopted? (I see, for instance, that Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Taiwan stations) was not, but there was ambiguity about the ANZ page.)
The second is a thought. Wikipedia:Naming conventions (stations) is occupied by a longtime historic proposal. Would it be worth archiving that elsewhere and, if the country stations pages have to be separate, creating a disambiguation page for the various railway station NC pages by country/region, or perhaps an overarching summary page for the nine NCs that are about or mention railway stations? The vast majority of links to it are archived talk pages. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 08:29, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know about the AUNZ page, but your idea for Wikipedia:Naming conventions (stations) is a good one - we'd just need to include a link to where the historic proposal is moved to (Wikipedia:Naming conventions (stations)/2004 proposal perhaps). Thryduulf (talk) 11:08, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd also like to see a link to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (broadcasting), for radio and television stations, at that title. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:09, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming conventions questions 

message: Hi, there is a discussion about the naming of KXSP in the new tube map over at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_London_Transport. Please join in if you wish. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 06:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  King's Cross & St Pancras International 

message: Hi, where should the Commons template be placed in, for example, station articles? Is it under References, External Links etc? The box I'm thinking of is this box , using TAT as an example... Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 15:20, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that if the article already contains an "External links" section, you can add the  template at the top of the list of links (so that the box will appear to the right of the links). If it doesn't, you can add an "External links" section with  as the sole entry. Deor (talk) 16:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: If the article is short and the box gets shoved down by other things, then move it to the left or switch to the  template. Keith D (talk) 17:06, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

text: see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout#Links to sister projects. Nthep (talk) 19:09, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

text: It always goes in the last section, which doesn't need to be named "External links". Don't create an external links section if all it would contain is the . This should be clear from the template's doc. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 12:09, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons Category placing in station articles 

message: Hi, I have started (or rather, restarted) a discussion about a proposal to merge the three pages pertaining to London Paddington station. If you would like to contribute, head over to Talk:London_Paddington_station#Merger proposal. Thanks. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 18:18, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  London Paddington station merge proposal 

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:Notability#Notability of train stations. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:01, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice of RfC on notability of train stations 

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Kegley station (Illinois) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kegley station (Illinois)]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
 Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:03, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[:Kegley station (Illinois)]] for deletion 

message: Seaboard Air Line Depot is currently classified as a disambiguation page, but does not fit the criteria. I have asked what to do with the page at Talk:Seaboard Air Line Depot. Any input will be appreciated. - Donald Albury 18:01, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What to do with Seaboard Air Line Depot 

message: Participants of this WP may be interested in hopping over to Draft talk:List of proposed railway stations in Scotland and seeing whether it is ready for mainspace yet. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:46, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed railway stations in Scotland 

message: As a heads-up: where instances of infobox station have the  attribute set, the resulting white-text-on-orange-background header doesn't comply with the requirements of MOS:CONTRAST. I've fixed this at  by manually enclosing the name string in a  template, but I'd appreciate other editors looking out for this too (or, even better, coming up with a systematic fix). Thanks. XAM2175 (T) 23:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The styling comes from Module:Adjacent stations/NSW TrainLink. Mackensen (talk) 00:24, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, and I gather that changing line 11 to read color: #ffffff000000; background-color: #f6891f; will do the trick. Do you know if this will affect any other application? XAM2175 (T) 02:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It won't; those settings are only used for station infoboxes. You can preview the effect when editing the module. Mackensen (talk) 02:48, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Brilliant, thanks very much. XAM2175 (T) 11:53, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of the "NSW TrainLink regional" style in infoboxes 

message: I would like a third opinion on whether the incident given in Division station (CTA Logan Square branch)#Accidents and incidents is important enough to include. This came up in a good article review. Steelkamp (talk) 16:43, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's sourced and relates to the station (which it is - it happened there), then I don't see any problem it being there. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 17:31, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree - petty robberies like this were sadly common at train stations back in the day. They're generally not worth noting except for unusual incidents like the 1995 attack at Kingston–Throop Avenues station. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:23, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third opinion requested 

message: Please see Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RFC on using maps and charts in Wikipedia articles. Rschen7754 15:27, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The RFC, now at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Using maps as sources, has questions related to notability. --Rschen7754 06:12, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC on whether citing maps and graphs is original research 

message: Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a  parameter to , which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to , and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass  a new  parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project-independent quality assessments 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains#Platform layouts, again: June 2023, which is within the scope of this WikiProject.  Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:53, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains]] 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at  Template talk:Infobox station#Move map, which is within the scope of this WikiProject.  Mackensen (talk) 13:56, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at [[Template:Infobox station]] 

message: Is this really notable? I saw this during this month's referencing drive, but did not edit it. Bearian (talk) 02:14, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: One of the largest freight and passenger stations in Slovenia, nearly 180 years old, I'd be astounded if there weren't sources available to prove its notability. Probably the majority aren't in English though, and a sizeable proportion won't be online. Thryduulf (talk) 18:58, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Can we find some sources, please? Bearian (talk) 15:39, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Celje railway station]] 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Cumnock (original) railway station#Requested move 14 April 2024, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 14:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[Cumnock (original) railway station]]