Talk:Equal employment opportunity

message: feel free to ask. Thetruthbelow (talk) 04:39, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any questions? 

message: There should be more written on what EEO is. --199.200.252.17 21:51, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is unduly U.S. -centric.￼ 142.169.16.62 (talk) 20:18, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand

message: i see a lot of signs that say EOE M/F/V/E some ive seem M/F/V and ive never seen EOE alone... is the M/F/V/E related and what does it mean does anyone have an answer if so does it fit under here.Shimonnyman 08:42, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have never seen the shorthand "EOE M/F/V/E", though I've worked in U.S. Federal government EEO for some years.  I Googled it and I see that it is used in the private sector and by some U.S. state and municipal governments.  The term I found was "EOE M/F/V/D", which stands for "Equal Opportunity Employer - Male/Female/Veterans/Disabled".  I don't know what the "E" you cited might stand for (ethnicity?) and I don't know why these categories are specified, and not race, national origin or religion.  Eastcote (talk) 01:47, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: EOE M/F/V/E

message: Why does "Equal Employment Opportunity" (EEO) redirect to Equal Opportunity Employment (EOE) when the usual language, at least in the USA, tends to be EEO and not EOE?  As in EEOC.  Shouldn't the article title be "Equal Employment Opportunity"? Eastcote (talk) 02:45, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  EEO vs EOE 

message: I noticed that there was a controversy about discrimination charges launched against Belmont Abbey College for not providing employees with contraception coverage. The educational institution views the matter in terms of freedom of religion and feels that its first amendment rights are being violated.  ADM (talk) 14:11, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Contraception coverage

message: I think this stub article should be merged as a section of the much larger at-will employment article, since EOE policies really are, more less, an exception to at-will employment.Wikieditor1988 (talk) 12:27, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with at-will employment

message: My suggestions for improvement are the following: creating a clear overview at the beginning explaining the importance for equality in the workplace. Generating a clear structure of points will help with the flow of information. [The overview, protected categories, and acts/cases that provided that protection] Giving each point its own section and more background will help balance the information rather than having many links. It helps the reader obtain a quick understanding in one place than clicking and being directed to other places. Since this article is very short, it does having a neutral coverage. Overall, elaborating on each main point and correcting little items such as capitalizing the title will make this article stronger and credible.
 Nkh2 (talk) 15:29, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  POSI 3318: Article Evaluation  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Equal employment opportunity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101124120813/http://www.llsdc.org:80/eeo/ to http://www.llsdc.org/eeo
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:36, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified