lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:FIFA 08

message: Um... did anyone notice there is nothing after "The game was well-received due to its refreshing new game mechanics which broke out from the series' criticised past record of not making an effort to innovate. Consequently, FIFA 08 has won or been nominated for the following awards:" ? Should this section be deleted? Wikiperson0202 (talk) 01:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical reception? 

message: I was a little confused to see that none of the German stadiums (e.g. Hamburg Arena) were included in the stadium list: is there a dispute over them, or were they accidentally skipped? Dalton Imperial (talk) 15:58, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was about to ask about this same thing. 69.112.113.154 (talk) 01:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  German Stadiums? 

message: The DS cartridge, as far as I know, can't support all these songs. If you know which songs are on the DS edition, please post this on the main article. Who says Carlos Tevez plays for Red Bull New York? Never mind that last sentence... 67.119.131.122 (talk) 01:04, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  DS Soundtrack 

message: Hey, I just noticed something in the list of National Teams. With the 1 2 3 4...etc, next to the countries saying if they are licensed or not, 4 is for teams with the right jersey but without the federations crest, and China is the only country that has this. I think the reason it doesn't have the crest on the jersey on FIFA is because...it doesn't actually have the crest on the jersey in real life, kinda like Australia how the Australian coat of arms is on the jersey, not the Football Federation Australia logo. China does actually have the flag on the jersey.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.176.92.237 (talk) 11:35, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Teams 

message: How about this one?
It's an official promotional website for the N-Gage version of the game. Can it be added?
Also how about this one - it's the official game page on N-Gage's website. IJK_Principle (talk) 19:46, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed links 
Talk:Leave Me Alone

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
I am proposing that Leave Me Alone (disambiguation) be renamed and moved to Leave Me Alone because:
#Leave Me Alone is currently just a redirect page for Leave Me Alone (song), and
#Page titles without (disambiguation) are preferred for disambiguation pages.
--ShelfSkewed Talk 03:16, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Page titles without "(disambiguation)" are preferred when the main title isn't being used for something else. In this case, though, it appears that the plain title is being used as a primary topic redirect to the Michael Jackson song. That might be valid or might not be (for one thing, if it holds, the song should be at the plain title), but the reasoning you've presented is not enough in and of itself to warrant a change. Therefore, I oppose the move unless you wish to argue that the Michael Jackson song is not the primary use. Dekimasuよ! 07:09, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I certainly can't argue that the MJ song is not the primary use; although there may be more people looking for the Veronicas song or the Pink song in the short term, the MJ song probably is the primary use in the long term, but I have no way of knowing. On the other hand, "leave me alone" is a common phrase and might come to be associated with any number of things in the future, and it might turn out to be inconvenient having that title married to one particular ephemeral pop song. I know: Wikipedia is not a crystal ball... --ShelfSkewed Talk 15:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
An article has been renamed from Leave Me Alone (song) to Leave Me Alone as the result of this move request. --Stemonitis 10:30, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Semantic analytics

message: I find it strange that “semantic analytics” should be defined by the use of ontologies. After all, they are just one tool in the toolchest of natural language processing and computational semantics people. Is this possibly a marketing term used by just a few people for something otherwise known as text mining or text analytics or natural language understanding? Clarification requested. --Thüringer ☼ (talk) 12:33, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ontologies as a defining condition?
Talk:James White (defensive tackle)

message: We need details like stats, how well known he is ect...--Accdude92 (talk) 17:57, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Details 
Talk:Liquid funk

message: No, that's not a criteria for liquid. Even the hardest Drum & Bass doesn't rely on samples and contains synth-lines. Liquid for me is an overall mainstream-compatible, pop-like track with female vocals, a light synth melody, piano samples and drumloops with a "soft" snare drum (as opposed to harder Drum & Bass) and emphasis on the hihats.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.253.186.62 (talk) 18:58, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Fewer bar-oriented samples?

message: I've cleaned up the lists in this article by removing all redlinks, and some of the articles blue-linked were unrelated. Embedded lists should really be avoided.
:The list of artists still has a lot of... interesting links that are completely unrelated.Evil oatmeal (talk) 22:00, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists 

message: Unless people really define its stylistic origin and stop putting everything thats just not in another sub genre into Liquid. It's starting to get bloated and redundant from general Drum & Bass. Alot of artists share roughly the same sentiment.Zoele (talk) 22:48, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This whole genre could be a stub. 
Talk:Robert Engels

message: I added sources, and removed the notice that this page does not cite sources. Llamabr 03:27, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Sorry, my summary for my revert mentioned WP:BIO, but I meant WP:BLP (and incidentally also WP:NOR but 🤷‍♀️) Ironiridis 23:31, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert
Talk:Active Body Control

message: ABC system is only a semi-active suspension supplying only a force in the downward direction, and cannot lift the wheel out of the way like in fully active suspensions designed by lotus and other F1 teams from 83-94.
:It is active. The count of "move-directions" has nothing to do with the defintion of active or passive systems. By the way: take a look at the Mercedes F700. The F700 can quasi take the wheel out of the way with the ABC System. The pens are set smooth.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.46.42.194 (talk) 12:11, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The definition of "active" is at stake here: for many engineers an active system is any self-powered moving device. In automotive engineering, an active system is an intelligent system that can self-control its working parameters in real time. The two main working parameters of any suspension system are its length of travel and speed of movement, i.e., its elasticity coefficient and its damping coefficient. Therefore, mounting computer-controlled jacks in the four corners of a car in order to raise or lower its body in a fancy manner will not automatically produce an active suspension system. Even more, body lean in itself has nothing to do with damping or wheel travel. Aldo L (talk) 08:08, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Boston Manor House

message: Wikipedia doesn't have a page for them. dannymusiceditor  Speak up!  15:13, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: @User talk:DannyMusicEditor. Go to Boston_%28disambiguation%29 and add them yourself . --Aspro (talk) 20:45, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: For anyone wondering about the band:

message: This page describes the manor house, with some history of the former manor of Boston. Shouldn't the title be Boston Manor House, rather than just Boston Manor? The Historic England listing and the London Borough of Hounslow historic houses web page both refer to Boston Manor House, and I would consider them authoritative. I propose changing (moving) the title to Boston Manor House, plus making a few in-page amendments to conform. What do others think? Masato.harada (talk) 15:38, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Title of article
Talk:Baturyn, Edmonton

message: It wouldn't surprise me if the neighbourhood is named for the castle in the Ukraine, but at the moment I don't have a source to confirm this.
Johntwrl 03:34, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The name Castle Downs is registered with the city of Edmonton as 2 words. 
Castle Downs 2604:3D09:6183:5700:A052:E109:3134:77DF (talk) 06:13, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct spelling of Castle Downs
Talk:Ealing Broadway station

message: Just about everything in this section other than the first sentence is high speculative with virtual no official status.  I think this is wholly incompatible with Wikipedia and should go.  If of any relevance (which I doubt) then it is not particulary related to Ealing Broadway station and should be have its own topic and the briefest of comments with a wikilink to it.--Pedantic of Purley (talk) 22:53, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Apart from the crystal ball and off-topic guidelines, the development section is contrary to other wikipedia guidelines. It seems like soap boxing by editors who are involved with a pressure group. The section contains weasel and peacock terms. The image is an advert. The section lacks reliable sources, the first is broken, the second is a self published source and the third is an opinion piece. The final paragraph is original research. BTW to sign and date your posts type four tildes like this (~~~~) Grim23★ 20:42, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development 

message: Articles should not include speculative opinions or analysis.
To be notable and verifiable a topic should have reliable secondary sources  that are independent of the subject, like a news report. The sources cited must unambiguously support the information in the article. Much of the speculation in the development section is unsourced, when it is sourced the source does not support most of the assertions. The sources are primary sources which may not prove notability and have not been subject to editorial scrutiny. Grim23★ 19:37, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New speculation 
Talk:1 Street SW station

message: Is located here. --kelapstick(bainuu)  19:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion about splitting this article
Talk:10 Street Southwest station

message: I just ran into the City of Calgary website about the 7th Avenue LRT corridor upgrades and ran into a web page that has the newest station named "Downtown West - Kerby" station. Will this be the official name of the station? Rockies77 (talk) 03:47, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Excuse me, why 11th??? Vcohen (talk) 11:32, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The new name of the "11th Street Station? 
Talk:3 Street SW station

message: Is located here. --kelapstick(bainuu)  19:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion about splitting this article
Talk:Crowfoot station

message: Assuming the copyright police don't delete the image (see the botspew, above) the map needs to be corrected as Crowfoot is labeled way too far south. It should be shown northwest of the intersection of Crowchild Tr. and Nose Hill Dr., but the current map shows it down around 53 Street somewhere. 68.146.47.196 03:59, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That notice meant the Calgary Transit logo, removed from the navbox in the meantime. Moved the "Crowfoot" label on the map, thanks for pointing that out. --Qyd 05:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Map is inaccurate
Talk:Australia national rugby sevens team

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Australia national basketball team which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 15:01, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:McKnight–Westwinds station

message: To whom was it open on the 15th, then? David Arthur (talk) 19:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Opened'/'Opened to the public' 
Talk:SAIT/AUArts/Jubilee station

message: How did this become Jubilee station? I never once have heard anyone call it that, I would say if anything it would only be SAIT station. While the name is long, is it not supposed to be SAIT/AUArts/Jubilee? --MattBinYYC (talk) 21:38, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of article
Talk:Somerset–Bridlewood station

message: This is really starting to annoy me now.  Beltliner (talk) 22:33, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Posted this page to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#Somerset-Bridlewood_.28C-Train.29 3RR notices] 24 Nov 2007 

message: I reverted the previous edits- the sources are invalid and the sections are unsourced but I put citation needed tags until no one has fixed them, in that case, I will delete the unsourced section. 
Update: This is no longer applicable as the content has been deleted and there did not appear to be any relevant searches. Nevertheless, if anyone can find any sourcing that would be great. Many thanks. Thanks VickKiang (talk) 03:02, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed
Talk:Sunnyside station (Calgary)

message: I saw a notice on this article saying that the ridership information was outdated. Unfortunately and this is the case with every station, the C-Train stopped providing ridership data for stations in 2010, with the most recent year for ridership data being 2007. 
That being said though, this article is still fairly dated, and I plan to go through updating every C-Train article with up to date information like I have recently done with Whitehorn, Rundle, Marlborough, Franklin, 4 Street SW, 39 Avenue, Chinook and Lions Park CnekYT (talk) 01:59, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I want to note though, that I am currently planning to send an email requesting data to Calgary Transit for up-to-date ridership data, so hopefully that goes through and there will be available data for ridership for a more current year CnekYT (talk) 02:00, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ridership Data
Template talk:Calgary Transit

message: We shouldn't include the West line stations until they're complete, or very close to complete.  Four years is a long ways away, and lots can happen in the mean time.  For instance, it's pretty easy to imagine any of the names being changed.  Also, redlinks encourage article creation, but I suspect such articles would be probably be deleted. --Rob (talk) 03:28, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  West line
Talk:Wales national rugby sevens team

message: Opening sentence ... The Wales national rugby union sevens team is the rugby sevens side for Welsh rugby union players.  Can I ask, what else the team would be for?  Suggest that it is reworded. -- billinghurst (talk) 15:52, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this is an answer to an old post, but no, the opening line is correct, it should state what it is in basic language, otherwise the World Series Baseball tournament would be assumed incorrectly from its name. FruitMonkey (talk) 22:04, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tautological?
Talk:Country Radio Broadcasters

message: I removed the following un-Cited statement: 
Without a Citation, there is no way this can be in an encyclopedia. And in order to head off 1 Cite source, no I would not consider  a secondary source. I consider it a Primary. Can we find an independant (read "neutral") source for this kind of statistic. Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 05:56, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cite needed
Talk:Natsu no Arashi!

message: now, there are 8 books from natsu no arashi!, dont erase my edition  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.144.236.34 (talk) 19:03, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The reception section doesn't even mention the reception, just that bloggers get stuff for their reviews (a common practice on blogs). This whole section can either be deleted or some actual reviews can be mentioned. 195.177.83.222 (talk) 15:22, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception
Talk:Sounder (film)

message: This article is about the 1972 version, there is a 2003 disney remake that I think deserves a seperate article, if anyone is interested. I'm still fairly new to wikipedia, so if someone wants to help me start this page, let me know.(Zakariya bin Dana (talk) 14:40, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  2003 Sounder movie 

message: Since this feature lists its cast in both the opening credits and in the end credits, it should be noted that, while the billing of the first seven names (Cicely Tyson, Paul Winfield, Kevin Hooks, Carmen Matthews, Taj Mahal, James Best, Eric Hooks) remains the same, the opening credits list the 8th-billed name as Yvonne Jarrel in the opening credits and as Yvonne Jarrell in the end credits. The 9th-billed name, Sylvia "Kuumba" Williams remains the same, while the 10th and final cast name in the opening credits, "and Janet MacLachlan" is replaced in the end credits by the billing "Ted Airhart as Mr. Perkins". The billing "Janet MacLachlan as Camille" is listed as the final name among the 29-name cast list in the end credits.
Furthermore, although the 4th-billed cast member's most frequently-credited stage name has been Carmen Mathews, her billing in both the opening and closing credits is Carmen Matthews. Also, the 18th-billed cast member, in his sole film credit, is listed as Carl Braser in AFI Catalog, IMDb and TCMDb, but his billing in the end credits is Carl Bruser. Finally, while a number of references, including IMDb and AFI Catalog (which uses [ ] brackets for the family surname), list the character names as "Rebecca Morgan", "Nathan Lee Morgan", "David Lee Morgan" and "Josie Mae Morgan", the film's end credits depict simply "Rebecca", "Nathan Lee", "David Lee" and "Josie Mae". —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 16:37, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Difference between opening credits and closing credits
Talk:Carl Valeri

message: I have classified this article as it is fairly detailed for the stage of Valeri's career. It should expand as his career progresses.Capitalistroadster 04:15, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start classification
Talk:Wyoming, Pennsylvania

message: Revised the section on the "Wyoming Massacre" including changing the name to the more accurate Battle of Wyoming. Many Wikipedia articles that reference the Battle of Wyoming state that 300 "settlers" were killed. This is misleading as use of the word "settler" suggests that women and children were massacred. "Patriot militia" could be used as an alternative, however, about 45 soldiers from the Continental Army also died. "Patriot soldiers" encompasses both militia and Continentals. Also misleading is the use of the phrase "British forces" because it infers that British regulars participated in the battle when in fact the only "British" present were Butler's Rangers, a Loyalist provincial regiment. Griffin's Sword (talk) 16:24, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Wyoming (Wyoming Massacre)
Talk:Lingga Regency

message: Require additions to be made in english - otherwise items must have trnslations with the original language - and also must have WP:RS thank you SatuSuro 06:35, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: English wikipedia
Talk:CFQC-DT

message: Don't wikilink names if the article being linked to is for someone else. It makes Wikipedia look stupid. 68.146.81.123 (talk) 18:44, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Linking names
Talk:Comisión Federal de Electricidad

message: Is the divisions section useful or just an overlong list?  RJFJR (talk) 16:44, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Divisions section
Talk:WMKD

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the ICAO code reference to an airport is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the airport. - Dravecky (talk) 09:48, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:Epactionotus

message: FishBase, used as a reference in this article, does not use initials in author citations for any of the species in this genus (Scientific Names where Genus Equals Epactionotus); neither does Catalog of Fishes, another major fish database which FishBase itself very often uses as a reference regarding taxonomy & nomenclature (Species in the genus Epactionotus).
From the WP article on author citation:
:"If the same surname is common to more than one author, initials are sometimes given" but "not all animal groups / databases use this convention" and "it should be noted that in the examples given in the Code and also the ICZN Official Lists and Indexes, initials are not used". XenoVon (talk) 13:50, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Author citation 
Talk:Bangka Strait

message: The map of Sulawesi must be incorrect, as Sulawesi is nowhere near Sumatra.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:445:8400:2750:C1ED:A5BD:87D6:F455 (talk) 00:18, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

message: Map shows the Bangka straight off Celebes, not Sumatra Abraxes42 (talk) 19:48, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map Error 

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—120.188.72.203 (talk) 11:12, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: . You haven't explained what error you're reporting, but the coordinates in the article were clearly incorrect, so I've emended them. Deor (talk) 13:44, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error