Talk:2006–07 NFL playoffs

message: * Since Kansas City Chiefs split the head-to-head with Denver Broncos, the division record determines who is better in the division. Since Kansas City has a better division record, they go up against the other 3 division 7-5 teams to determine Wild Card. Since Kansas City comes in last out of the 4, that puts Denver behind Kansas City, even though Denver has a 4-2 Conference record. Figgie123 14:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seedings... 

message: What is the criteria for determining "important games" for the last few weeks of the season? Unless you cite some sources from news sites, it look more like original research. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 17:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thats Because it is Original Resource from NFL.com. Don't think about deleting the section as which it greatly helps the article. Since it will change every week, I'll add the template that says It will change fast over the next weeks.-Kings bibby win 22:20, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If that is the case, please actually cite the links to the specific news articles from NFL.com listing these important games. Without any citations to references, it looks like it is original research on your part. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 02:28, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Otherwise, I am going to modify the list so that it shows "remaining games in which both teams are still in playoff contention". Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 02:44, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's already on their. -Kings bibby win 05:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Games 

message: Who keeps changing the tables in the Standings section? They are a lot less attractive and clean than the tables that were there before, and they are very inconsistent with the current tables that are on articles pertaining to previous NFL seasons. Please change them back the way they were. Thank you. Manningmbd 05:02, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standings 

message: It states that the current winner of the Dallas Seattle game would play New Orleans, when that winner would in fact play Chicago.... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.98.134.66 (talk) 17:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NFC Bracket is Wrong /So is AFC 

message: Broncos lost against 49ers.
I tried to change, but I couldn't..
Holy crap hurry up and change
:And they're out before anyone noticed. Good run though. :P 75.34.23.204 20:56, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CHIEFS ARE GOING TO PLAYOFF 

message: Whoever changed Chargers to Losers. Get a life and stay off the site.
Casino17 23:26, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's keep the idiocy off this site. 

message: Looks like it's going to be a sleepnes night for NY Football fans, both teams are out. BuickCenturyDriver 07:13, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Giants & Jets 

message: Based on recent vandalism from various anonymous IP addresses, I removed all instances of Template:Linescore Amfootball from yet-to-be-played games. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:08, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent vandalism 

message: Someone please flip the bracket around so that the AFC is on the bottom and the NFC is on the top. The Super Bowl is being played in an AFC stadium, so the team representing the AFC will be the home team. Thanks. Manningmbd 04:41, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bracket Needs to be Changed 

message: This is superfluous.  All 12 teams have links on the page already to the team pages, whence one additional click gets to the season page for that team.  None of the other NFL playoff pages have this.  Unless there's an objection to it, I'll remove the section.  If there's some consensus for keeping the links around in some format, I'd rather see either the links in the Bracket changed to point to the season rather than the team, or the Seed table at the top of the page could be modified to do so.  The latter would also require changing the template that the 8-division playoffs have been based on the last few years, and therefore those yearly pages.  I've done a test on my user pages to confirm how this can be done with the addition of one parameter to the template, and volunteer to implement it across all of the 8-division playoff articles if that's the consensus.The Monster 05:42, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Modifying Template:NFL seeds 2002- currently will not work entirely since every single possible team season page has not been created yet. When someone creates 2002 Oakland Raiders season, 2002 Atlanta Falcons season, 2002 San Francisco 49ers season, 2003 Dallas Cowboys season etc. maybe we'll talk. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 12:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Then that option is off the table.  Any preferences on changing the bracket links to point to the teams' seasons rather than the team pages?The Monster 17:44, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SfD: "See also (team season pages)" 

message: This page sites sources at the bottom but is lacking specific citations. As you write entries, put your sources with it. Add sources as needed to past entries.Benje309 23:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of those look like sources I added, but someone else decided to remove.  At this point I'm not going to bother trying to add them back and get in a revert war.The Monster 03:32, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Research/ Citing Sources

message: I saw that three images (:Image:NFL-PO_6510.gif,:Image:NFL-PO_6511.gif, and :Image:NFL-PO_6512.gif) were uploaded and added to this article, by the same user.  In each case, an existing image, occupying roughly a third the space of the new image, was already on the servers.  I have replaced the references here to point to the smaller images, but frankly I'm not sure enough of the fair use rules to know whether they should be here at all. The Monster 03:32, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Those images do not comply with rule #3 of WP:FUC since these images have a higher resolution than the existing ones. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:21, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images uploaded 2007-01-15

message: Should Baltimore be 27 and San Diego be 28 since they're eliminated? Kingjeff 04:27, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, except for the Super Bowl participants, everyone gets their draft picks by record. Whammies Were Here (PYLrulz) 18:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[2007 NFL Draft]]

message: Who screwed up the bracket? Whoever did, please fix it. Manningmbd 15:45, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bracket

message: WOW!  whoever predicted those scores while the colts-pats game was going on, must be a pretty good predictor! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thejedi3 (talk • contribs) 04:10, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: scores

message: * Why do we need the starting quarterbacks as statistics? Can we add starting nose-tackle too? How about opening kick kicker? Looks like 64.30.84.199 (contribs) has added them to all playoff articles back to 1971. Way more than half of this IP's edits have been for starting quarterbacks, and all over the span of 2 days. Figgie123 22:55, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starting Quarterbacks... 

message: Are they really needed to be a level higher the score? Can't they be placed on one level 2 header? --Howard the Duck 14:55, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sectioned dates on Conference Championship