lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Monument Park High School

message: Hi. I would just like to warn whoever made this page that it will probably soon be completely deleted. The page does not at all conform to Wikipedia guidelines, and contains hardly any sources. Additionally, many spurrious edits were made by anonymous contributors.
I will try to get to labeling and/or editing this page over the weekend to remove all of the "wrong" content, but I would advise whoever created the page to fix it themselves before I get to it. Or before Wikipedia bots and moderators get to it.
Please read here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Editing_policy
Regards Janneman27 (talk) 21:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia style guide
Category talk:World War II artillery of Germany

message: This category needs to have recoilless guns added. These include the 75mm Leicht Geschütz 40, 105mm Leicht Geschütz 40, 105mm Leicht Geschütz 42, 105mm Leicht Geschütz 43 and the 150mm Leicht Geschütz 292.
Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:24, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do that by adding Category:World War II German guns to the bottom of whatever page you want in the category. (Removing editprotected) Gimmetrow 23:33, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Laeti

message: This article is full of original research and fallacious conclusions.  Contrast it with the French version -- which is very well done.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.215.149.97 (talk) 14:38, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: As the main author of this article, I reject your unilateral and arbitrary gutting of this article, and have restored the text you removed. You should not remove text without first achieving a consensus for such removal on the Talk page. The fact that you consider text "speculative" or "fallacious" is irrelevant, providing that text is properly sourced. It is sourced, to heavyweight authors such as Jones, Elton, Goldsworthy and to the Notitia Dignitatum itself. Your preference for the French article is also irrelevant, and absurd, since the French article is much less detailed and fails to consider key issues. And get yourself a Username if you want to be taken seriously as an editor. EraNavigator (talk) 14:57, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is full of OR 

message: I'm not a historian and from what is written about laeti and foederati on wikipedia it's quite hard for me to understand any difference between these two notions. Perhaps it would be useful for someone competent to explain the difference if there is known one (personal freedom???) VeNoo (talk) 04:14, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laeti and foederati 

message: I'm not a professional but an amateur historian with an interest in the field. The article mentions that Laeti are not mentioned anywhere in the Eastern Empire. 
Could "laeti" just be the Proto-Germanic word for "people"? Ie. modern German "Leute". Perhaps it is just the local (German) word for Foederati? The German vernacular would've had their own word to refer to themselves outside of the Latin Foederati. 
Considering the barbarians on the borders of the Western Empire were mostly all Germanic (outside of Britannia), this would explain its use there, but not necessarily in the East with its mixture of tribes of different language groups.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.61.210.25 (talk) 21:41, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laeti - word origin 
Talk:Peregrinus (Roman)

message: The article begins:
Peregrinus was the term used during the early Roman empire, from 30 BC to 212 AD, to denote a free provincial subject of the empire who was not a Roman citizen. Peregrini constituted the vast majority of the empire's inhabitants in the 1st and 2nd centuries AD. Peregrini were effectively second-class citizens … 
Well, no, you just said they weren't citizens. "Second-class" citizens of ancient Rome might be people who lived in towns that had civitas sine suffragio, citizenship without the right to vote. It sounds as if peregrini were people who were "free" (that is, not slaves) but who were not citizens. Cynwolfe (talk) 13:43, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  say again?
Talk:GRIN2B

message: Saw no direct mention in the reference given; Pubmed search also was not successfull. --CopperKettle (talk) 11:38, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Linked to dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy?

message: Were under discussion here.   Should shift discussion of these specific edits here. I am copying my own initial comments there, here.  
* diff -- series of edits explicitly about human health sourced to primary sources  and  and   and  (an 18 year old primary source) and  and  and a Nature News piece and a NAS report and a Science News piece (). The content suggests gene editing to cure autism (editing the genes discussed in the content based on primary sources). This is dangerous and irresponsible editing and I have reverted it.  22:20, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  As the article stands now, there is no reason to mention the FOXP2. Perhaps you don't understand the topic. DennisPietras (talk) 02:52, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I missed that bit of WP:SYN (yet more policy-violation).  removed it. Jytdog (talk) 02:58, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits
Talk:Aurora Transportation Center

message: I propose that the section History be split into a separate page called Aurora Burlington Route Depot. The former Burlington Route depot in Aurora is notable enough for its own article, and although the content of this current section is not detailed, more relevant information and content can be added to a separate article. The history of the Aurora Transportation Center itself can also be expanded upon in this article. Derpytoucan (talk) 02:23, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I would prefer Aurora station (Burlington Route) over your wording, but otherwise, support it. Mitch32(sail away with me to another world.) 01:41, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

text: Support, since the CBQ depot was on a different site from the Aurora Transportation Center, and it served some notable trains (including three Amtrak trains before 1983) that the current station doesn't. - SleepTrain456 (talk) 17:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting proposal
Talk:Clarendon Hills station

message: The Infobox says station opened in 1965. This is obviously wrong as I was using it in 1948; perhaps is a reopening date after station renovations. The 3 Hinsdale stations' Wiki pages say opened in dates from 1875 to 1898.  The main Wiki page for CB&Q says passenger service between Aurora and Chicago began in 1864.  I removed the offending date pending posting, I hope, of a better date. Casey (talk) 01:54, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening date
Talk:Codex Aureus of Lorsch

message: I heard of a scandal envolving some high ranking oficials from the Romanian Ministery of Culture and from the University of Alba Iulia who eligaly aloud the copy of the Romanian part of the Codex in Swiss. Any cnoledge of it? (Skepsis)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.123.84.7 (talk) 18:39, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Country data Andalusia

message: my proposition is to change the flag to the SVG version that i created. hope it will be accepted. Oren neu dag (talk) 23:41, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please discuss it first. Od Mishehu 07:12, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing the flag to [[:image:Bandera de Andalucia.svg]]
Talk:Gino Lucetti

message: I would merge this article into a single account of assassination attempts on Mussolini but, in this case, Lucetti appears to have a monograph written about him. If it goes into biographical detail, would seem to warrant Lucetti's own biographical article. If anyone reads it and finds that this isn't the case, let's talk about merger. (not watching, please ) czar 16:22, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope 

message: The article ends with ″The bomb exploded on the ground, slightly injuring eight people but leaving the target unharmed.″ It would be good to say what happened next, that he was sentenced to 30 years in prison and then escaped in 1943, and was killed by a German bombing https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gino_Lucetti. Otherwise a reader might wonder if Lucetti died only six days after the assassination attempt and that the 17 September 1943, date of his death in the article is wrong.
R. Paul Martin (talk) 08:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: More Information Needed
Talk:Château Pichon Longueville

message: It's a disambiguation page linking to two articles which clearly meet the notability requirements. Where's the problem? Tomas e (talk) 00:01, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, two extremely notable wineries that are second growths in the historical (and exclusive) Bordeaux Wine Official Classification of 1855. I trust that the speedy tag was just a good faith mistake. AgneCheese/Wine 08:12, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion
Talk:Lars Ulstadius

message: As for the requested citations and improvements of the language, I could and would be willing to contribute, but it would be easiest if the person who made those requests would examplify what it is that he is unhappy with. To start with, all the information in the article can be found in the new references I have added. /Leos Friend (talk) 00:02, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Perna perna

message: "However, it is advised that concentration of chlorine should be above the tolerance level of the toughest mussel."
I'm confused as to what this sentence means. Can it be reworded to be clearer? Murderbike (talk) 00:19, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: QUestion
Talk:Edmund Landolt

message: * Refraction and Accommodation, 1886 
* (Landolt's)? Modern Treatment of Cataract, 1893 
* Anomalies of the Motor Apparatus of the Eyes, 1900  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Essexesd (talk • contribs) 07:29, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collection of (unverified) works 

message: I have declined a speedy deletion nomination for this article. There is sufficient evidence of notability that we should allow a reasonable time for the article to be developed. Newyorkbrad (talk) 01:31, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion declined

message: Are tere a format for listing published works in Wikipedia ?
Aka the BiBTex style.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Essexesd (talk • contribs) 11:51, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bibliography
Talk:Tai Dón people

message: --Nintala (talk) 01:04, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In which case, be bold and change it - but either the title should be changed or the first line should be altered to give the 'Thai' spelling as an option.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.70.156.254 (talk) 17:12, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Credo ut intelligam

message: Please give the source for the "credo ut intelligam" citation. Which work(s) of Augustine can it be found in?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.105.137.77 (talk) 21:19, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Searches

message: I don't see this in the article, but it seems pretty important. When St. Augustine says, Nisi credideritis, non intellegetis "Unless you believe, you shall not understand" (sermon 43.7), he is making explicit reference to Isaias 7:9. The translation he'd have been working from would be the Old Latin, which, in this passage, is more or less a literal translation from the Septuagint, which reads καὶ ἐὰν μὴ πιστεύσητε οὐδὲ μὴ συνῆτε, where συνῆτε is a form συνίημι "to understand" (Strong's Greek 4920). (The Vulgate, however, renders it differently: Si non credideritis, non permanebitis "If you will not believe, you shall not continue".) 73.133.224.40 (talk) 11:58, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added this information, with a source that mentions the differences between the Vetus Latina and the Vulgate versions of Isaiah 7:9. Veverve (talk) 04:47, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biblical basis?
Talk:55th Sustainment Brigade (United States)

message: The unit has not been deployed.  It is currently partially mobilized and preparing to deploy ot Iraq in March, 2008.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.217.1.34 (talk) 20:12, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If the article is incorrect, feel free to ammend it. -Ed! (talk) 21:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Imagine Publishing

message: Why are we allowing so many one-sentence "paragraphs" of unsourced trivial content? - I am dis big (talk) 14:38, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced trivial fluff
Template talk:Indianapolis Metro

message: Population or area? I believe that the phrase "largest to smallest" refers to population, but it is ambiguous, as it could be referring to area. Correct me if I'm wrong. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 19:25, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just alphabetized the list instead. HoosierStateTalk 19:55, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest? 

message: I removed these designation from the headings, because there are municipalities of both types under both headings.  Also removed "largest" because this template appears to include all of them, not just the largest. --L. Pistachio (talk) 02:27, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cities vs. towns/villages
Talk:Got Your Money

message: Whoever wrote the "Summary" for this song is a comedic genius.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.55.173.118 (talk) 04:55, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree: it clearly should be reduced to a few sentences or removed entirely, but it's... hilarious. Korny O'Near (talk) 01:43, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree. It's quite the accurate summary, though it stretches the definition of "summary". Nick Heer 03:49, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

message: All the footage of ODB comes from his 1995 video for Shimmy Shimmy Ya. It's very strange that a rapper does not appear in his own music video. Does anyone know the reason why? This should be included. --Harizotoh9 (talk) 18:45, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music video:
Talk:English ship Lion (1557)

message: Is Lion's 141 year career considered any sort of record? Seems obscenely long to me, given that she wasn't specifically preserved like Victory.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.19.84.33 (talk) 19:11, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: She was rebuilt (to varying degrees of completeness) 4 times during her 'life'. Some of these may have been total rebuilds, with little to none of the original ship remaining. This was common at the time. The reason for each of these incarnations being grouped into the one article is that ships often remained on the active list despite existing in a state of potentially total dismantlement, so the official records show her as one and the same. Martocticvs (talk) 22:50, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  141 year career
Talk:Feel Like Makin' Love (Roberta Flack song)

message: This really needs credits for the musicians. I only got here because I was reviewing the work of legendary bassist Anthony Jackson. This page lists all the chart number 1s but doesn't mention ANY of the players who made the record. Seems a bit odd eh?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.197.140.38 (talk) 11:39, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Pablo Lima

message: I rated it as a C-Class article as it seems to match the Wikiproject football criteria. Hansi667 (talk) 20:26, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Class change
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Newsletter/Newsroom

message: No problems with the leaderboard concept...good idea!  Just one question.  The WikiWork stuff...I read through the subpage describing it.  And, to boot, I'm terrible at statistics.  One should probably write a very simple layman's explanation of what the values mean.  Because I have no idea what it means.  --Son (talk) 00:52, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Leaderboard

message: I think for one issue every year, the state update section should be dropped in favor of an "editor update" section.  I know I've griped in the past (in other forums) about the same states being in the state update section every issue, but so far we don't even have that – just one state so far.  This idea is about keeping the newsletter fresh so we actually want to update it.  I don't want to see it die because of apathy again. –Fredddie™ 00:26, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  State update section 

message: Are these for everyone to fill out, or just "new" users? I have seen editors that have been with us for awhile filling them in. Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 23:13, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Some specific editors were invited to participate, based mostly on newness to the project. Imzadi 1979 →  23:27, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  User interviews 

message: So when are you publishing? It says the deadline was mid April... A month and a half ago. Rcsprinter123   (cackle) @ 21:56, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: the newsletter editors cannot put together issues without content. If you would like to contribute features, please do so, but I will not write full newsletter issues by myself just to make a deadline. Imzadi 1979 →  21:59, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lateness 

message: (Specifically pinging you cause you seem most active here) I've just recently joined the WikiProject (although I've been editing for just a tiny bit longer as an unofficial member) and started looking around. I've noticed several areas lacking and this one took to my attention the most. I was wondering if we got enough participation would you consider participating/publishing. Potentially bringing attention back to the WikiProject (and no I'm not saying use it as promotion/advertising but people may see it and be like "U.S. Roads newsletter? Oh yeah I remember that!" bringing their attention it). It appeared it was once a great project but that participation has significantly went down recently. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:01, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: As before, , if there is content, we can publish. Imzadi 1979 →  04:03, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  I saw the last reply however that was three years agoo so I was not sure if your views had changed. I'll see what I can do. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:12, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Tourbillon Castle

message: Hi, I wanted to make it clear that this article is a translation from the french one, which I also wrote. I am not used to english Wikipedia but I have a good amount of experience on the french one. There might be some things that were not done like they usually are in this language and I'm sorry about it. If there is anything big I should have done, please let me know. As for the translation, I used DeepL to make it faster and there might be inaccruacies in the description of the castle; I am fluent in english but not really in this specific domain. Also, I have asked for a GA review because the french version was voted the equivalent of GA earlier this month, and I belive this criteria here are pretty much the same as in french. Thank you in advance for any potential feedback. - Espandero (talk) 19:08, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writer's note
Talk:Bombardier Challenger 850

message: OK, the obvious question: when did she make her first flight?  TREKphiler hit me ♠  01:42, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Taking a flyer
Talk:List of tennis stadiums by capacity

message: The list of Tennis Venue Capacities has the Lindner Family Tennis Center center court as 10,500 --- it is 11,400 at least 
also at the same venue, their Grandstand holds 5,000 and their court #3 holds 2,000 - both permanent "tennis only" stadiums, but neither is on the list ???? source is first hand -- I volunteer at W&S Masters in Cincy 71.72.226.59 (talk) 12:39, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lindner FTC

message: Shouldn't the Sportparkstadion in Frankfurt also be present in this list? It was used three times for the Fed Cup and has 4.800 seats:
http://www.dfg-frankfurt.de/deutsch_franzoesisch/dfg_pdf/cupoflegends.pdf
--ALE! (talk) 12:39, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sportparkstadion Frankfurt 

message: I propose to combine the lists of men's and women's tennis venues into one single list. Not convinced in the first place that it is relevant to have two lists but there is a massive overlap between the two and therefore a lot of unnecessary duplication of content. A quick estimate is that 75% of the women's venues are also part of the men's list. We can easily combine the lists and if we still want to make a distinction between men's, women's and combined venues we can simply add a column with that info. Thoughts? --Wolbo (talk) 09:48, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: If the information is overlapping as you say and WTA events do take place at the same ATP event (venue-stadium) as indicated here Canadian Open - Masters 1000, WTA Premier 5 it makes sense to me I have no objections and support proposal--Navops47 (talk) 10:59, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Per Navops47 I would tend to agree. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:13, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed on condition that there is an indication, preferably a separate column on the table (in order to assist sorted-view) which would indicate that whether the court/stadium is a WTA or ATP or dual host. Loginnigol (talk) 02:37, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds reasonable. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:23, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  That option is offered in the proposal and seems the logical way to go to keep this piece of info.--Wolbo (talk) 09:55, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  The lists have been merged into one table and a 'Tour' column has been added to indicate 'ATP', 'WTA' or 'Combined'. Some chronological sorting might still be required and a check if all the women's tournaments came across.--Wolbo (talk) 13:38, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Rechecked the merged list and all the women's tournaments are present.--Wolbo (talk) 12:50, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combined list 

message: So there's NO need to insert Wimbledon above the two others. That is ignorance-based editing which distorts and contravenes the order on the whole list. Loginnigol (talk) 12:37, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shanghai and Beijing had 15000 capacity before Wimbledon