Talk:Prime Minister of Ukraine

message: Is Yushchenko actually Prime Minister, or acting Prime Minister?  I haven't seen any news that says other than Yanukovych quit.  —Michael Z. 17:52, 2005 Jan 2 (UTC)
:I don't know who wrote this, but if you ask me, it's utter nonsense! I've checked several sources, and nowhere it was mentioned that Yushchenko is prime minister at the moment, acting or not. Indeed, Yanukovych officially resigned on Dec. 31. My guess is that vice-premier Mykola Azarov is probably fulfilling the role of acting prime minister once again, a role he also played between Dec. 7 and Dec. 28. IJzeren Jan 19:23, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, this is not the case. Most acting PMs were specifically appointed after the previous PM resigned and most acting PMs never became actual PMs Sashazlv 04:28, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

text: I'm not referring to the ones marked "acting" at the moment, but Tymoshenko appeared on the table in two entries, as Acting PM before her appointment's ratification, and as PM after that.  Wouldn't most of the PMs be first appointed, then ratified by the Rada?  I'm just saying that none of these should be listed twice, so I changed Tymoshenko to one entry, with the ratification date.  Also shortened the redundant section heading.  —Michael Z. 2005-02-5 15:04 Z
Not exactly so. By precedent, the consecutive order is: (1) for the President to name a candidate, (2) for the Rada to grant assent for appointment, (3) for the President to appoint the candidate. 
Step (1) is accomplished by sending an official letter from the President to the Speaker.
Step (2) is regulated by the parliamentary act N 287/96-ВР, dated July 10, 1996. .
Step (3) is accomplished by a presidential appointment edict.
Both Kuchma and Yushchenko followed the procedure. Incidentally, official translation of the Constitution gives the term: the Verkhovna Rada gives consent to the appointment of the Prime Minister. I don't know why someone changed the correct term to ... ratifies .... Ratifies may be understood as confirms or appoints. Presently, it is the President who appoints and unilaterally dismisses the Prime Minister. Besides, ratification is more commonly applied in the context of international treaty ratifications. So, I think that gives consent to the appointment is much less ambiguous. 
Interestingly, Tymoshenko is the only PM who was acting PM before the official appointment. In my opinion, in appointing her as acting PM on January 23rd, President Yushchenko did not exactly follow part 5 of Article 115 of the Constitution. However, the Constitution says nothing about acting PMs and the Constitutional Court is unlikely to interpret the Constituion in this case.
Sashazlv 00:11, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the patient explanation.  So then Tymoshenko was appointed acting PM on 01-24, and on 02-04 she was appointed PM along with the Rada's consent, right?  In that case perhaps I should have left her brief tenure as acting PM as a separate item on the list.  —Michael Z. 2005-02-6 00:17 Z
PS: it just occurred to me to wonder whether rada comes from the same Latin root as ratify.
Regarding Tymoshenko -- yes, that's the case, but, frankly speaking, the Constitution does not give the President the right to appoint acting PM or any acting member of the Cabinet. This is rather done by precedent, since in Kravchuk's times the President was the head of the executive branch.
Rada. Merriam-Webster also says it may be related to a Gothic verb. It may be interesting to see whether there is something in Sanskrit. At this point, etymology is a bit clouded.
I am currently thinking how to reorganize the list to account for in office terms and acting terms. Maybe, it would be better to keep people who were only acting PMs: Symonenko, Durdynets, and Azarov in a separate list or in a footnote.
Sashazlv 01:18, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Is Yushchenko actually Prime Minister, or acting Prime Minister?

message: According to Dilas25 "the Constitution of Ukraine (Art. 10) guarantees free development, use and protection of Russian language" but what the hell has that got to do with editing wikipedia? And why is not the Sorbian name of the German Bundestag included in that article? It is quite obvious the only reason Dilas 25 is editing wikipedia is to Russiafy Ukrainian articles. In my view this guy should be banned from wikipedia cause he is only here to push a political agenda. Let's have a propper discussion first and not let clowns like Dilas 25 (he added the Bellarussian name in Prime Minister of Ukraine...) take over wikipedia. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 13:59, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Russian name 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:17, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Ukrainian Prime Minister Mykola Azarov.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: in the Russian language, the have an own letter for you, while not in the Ukrainian language they decided to disregard the smalliest b to indicate the softness of the previous letter  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A0A:A548:4E96:0:94CF:B0B6:4DE4:E7C2 (talk) 12:22, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: = what is the difference between youtube and youtube 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Prime Minister of Ukraine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111003224218/http://www.nta-nn.ru/news/item/?ID=79842 to http://www.nta-nn.ru/news/item/?ID=79842
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604215457/http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/9/23/202629.shtml to http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/9/23/202629.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121208071044/http://en.for-ua.com/news/2012/12/04/121055.html to http://en.for-ua.com/news/2012/12/04/121055.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:07, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified