lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Integrated education in Northern Ireland

message: I classed this as a medium importance document in NI Project, as i think that it is probably of some importance, but low in the whole schools project.  I recon that it needs a lot of work so it is a stub.  I dont know if i am supposed to rate things like this but i am thinking that if i rate it then maybe more people will have a look at the article and it will develop.  Personally i recon that the main things that would improve it, and i may have a bash at these are:
A - Setting out more clearly who/what classes a school as integrated, and working out where the uncited facts come from, and placing the opinions in a more balanced light.
B - Setting out the layout a bit better - ie basically splitting up into History, and Current sections - as i believe these are both important and currently they are mixed together in a rather unsatisfactory way.
I set it as not needing an info box - as (as far as i can see the info boxes relate more to actual schools, where-as this is an education related article.
Wideofthemark 20:10, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating 

message: How do integrated schools determine their own integrated status? There's nothing in this artice about the mechanics of integration in intergrated schools. Is it by quota? Who regulates the religious makeup of these schools?
So many unanswered questions... ! Icanseeformilesandmiles 18:11, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *shrugs* State schools are actually integrated schools. --Mal 08:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major details missing 

message: Currently both wikipedia articles for Integrated Education and Lagan College state that Lagan was the first integrated school in N. Ireland. If Holywood Rudolf Steiner School is the first then these articles need to be updated. Perhaps Lagan is the first state run integrated school.--Design 12:36, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Friends is not an integrated School, to be called integrated you need the blessing of the militant social engineers at NICIE. The fact that it is an excellent school that accepts all religions and none is not relevant to them.Traditional unionist 08:16, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First integrated School

message: The statistic that 95% of pupils attend denominational schools still hasn't been given a reference, despite this having been tagged for a while.
The article also distinguishes between Catholic and Protestant schools without mentioning the Nationalist/Unionist politics (granted they fall very closely along those lines, but there have been examples of Protestant Nationalists for example).Autarch (talk) 22:00, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some issues
Talk:Mick Mumford

message: Kovco was part of a 3RAR detachment in Iraq, but Mumford did not command it there. (He was CO of the 3RAR as a whole.)
Mumford commanded 3RAR in Timor Leste.
I just wish there was a reference around the net somewhere which could be used as a citation of Mumford burning down Wednesday Island in late'98... :) 124.169.9.94 (talk) 11:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Afd2 starter

message: Every time this is subst'd onto a deletion discussion, the discussion is added to . The last edit to the page caused the problem. Please revert it (or fix it). --Pnm (talk) 18:59, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't follow why that is happening. When I do a  it does not add the part inside the noinclude tags. -- WOSlinker (talk) 10:26, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done thos which should stop the category showing unless the page is a template. -- WOSlinker (talk) 10:34, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I've removed it. It's an issue with preload rather than subst. -- WOSlinker (talk) 10:40, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! It seems to be working correctly now. --Pnm (talk) 11:36, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category being added to deletion discussions in error 

message: As per WP:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2013_November_14#Template:Talkdoc, please replace
Category:Articles for deletion templates with

In the past, preloads could not handle noincludes, but this has been resolved as witnessed by the existence of those statements. The category already exists in the documentation.
Dpleibovitz (talk) 00:29, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --Redrose64 (talk) 00:41, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add documentation 

message: Could someone please replace |Articles for deletion/||1}}, so that the preload works properly if the article title contains a slash.
Pppery 13:51, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 14:42, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 12 November 2016
Talk:Rick Adams (Internet pioneer)

message: See Template_talk:FOSS_celeb#Rick_Adams.3F for editing this page, Rick Adams (Internet pioneer). - Lentower 02:21, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Barrel hitch

message: Something's wrong.  The upper illustration shows an overhand knot, while the next shows a figure-of-eight knot.  The instructions won't get you from one to the other.
I made a new diagram on how to tie the knot. It works, it's not a figure-of-eight. If you follow the path, it does not alternate (over-under-...). I also removed the stub status and added the "expand" status + a few rearrangement in the text. --Alex (talk) 12:04, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Old Lake County Courthouse (Florida)

message: IS THIS AMERICA??? 
WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD SOMEONE WITH A CAMERA GET ARRESTED??!  ARE YOU SERIOUS. 
THIS PLACE AND YOUR LAZY STANDING AROUND TALKING ALL DAY "COPS" SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOUR SELF. 
ANYONE WHO WATCHES THIS IS GOING TO BE ASTONISHED WATCHING THESE MALL COPS ARREST AN AMERICAN CITIZEN FOR FILMING IN A PUBLIC COURT AREA. 
WOW!! THIS IS NOT NAZI GERMANY!! 
Or is it???? AND FYI. JUDGES DON'T MAKE LAW. 
I HOPE HE GETS A GOOD ATTORNEY AND WIPES THE FLOORS WITH YALL.  
THIS IS EMBARRASSING!!! 
WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT.  THERE IS NO EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY WHEN YOU'RE IN PUBLIC I DON'T KNOW IF THEY TAUGHT YOU THAT BUT THE FOREFATHERS MADE THAT LAW YEARS AND YEARS AGO IF YOUR FAMILY WAS TO COME IN AND DO THAT I BET YOU WOULDN'T APPRECIATE THEM GETTING LOCKED UP BECAUSE THEY HAVE RIGHTS THERE'S LIKE 300 CAMERAS IN THAT COURTHOUSE RECORDING EVERYBODY AND IF WE WALK IN WITH ONE CAMERA YOU ARE S*** YOURSELF MAYBE YOU SHOULDN'T BE COPS I DON'T KNOW 2601:485:4101:98F0:4834:2297:72C0:9E8 (talk) 21:20, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am ashamed I'm watching a YouTube channel of some one named Patrick.
Talk:Carrickfergus College

message: Victuallers 15:17, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Beasties (film)

message: The film is listed as a 1989 release on this page and under the List of horror films of 1989 page however IMDB lists its VHS release as 1991.  Similarly, it is also listed on the List of horror films of 1991.  Unless anyone has information on an original 1989 release it might be worth removing from 1989 list and changing this page to reflect IMDB's 1991 date.
The Critical Condition review External link has this to say: "It was shot on 8mm in 1989 and distributed by Cinema Home Video in 1991 with the first 20 minutes cut out to pick up the pace." Theoretick (talk) 19:24, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date 1989 or 1991? 

message: I haven't seen the film, but I can recognize poor sentence structure and went in to do something about that. Anyone who actually has seen this film and feels the urge to add/subtract to what I did please feel free. Cheers! Linguafoeda 17:03, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Reworded the Plot
Talk:European Megalithic Culture

message: Why is this title capitalized? --Wetman 00:31, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have more often seen it capitalised as a proper name than otherwise. TharkunColl 08:18, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I was so bold as to implement a fairly substantial edit, obviously hoping for ot to be accepted, altered or discussed.
* Changed some of the overly assertive expressions (archaeologists don't tend to use "beyond doubt" very happily, because to a scientist, nothing should be so). 
* Clarified the prevailing consensus of the megalithic phenomenon not being as unified as once thought, and not being identical with the Neolithic.
* Added some countries to the distribution list.
* Added passage graves and gallery graves to the list of monument types.
* Created a new section called "linguistic speculation" to separate those issues from the more descriptive bits.
* Added some links (there is a rather confusing variety of overlapping articles about this and related topics on wiki. I sometimes wonder should we merge some of them. Perhaps we should also explicitly link to the known cultures that constitute the European megalithic phenomenon, as far as they are presented on wikipedia.
athinaios 11:05, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  some editing
Talk:1980 Pennsylvania Lottery scandal

message: :Do you think a disambiguation page is in order?
:I just created an article for Assemblyman N. Nick Perry, and when you type in Assemblyman Nick Perry you get redirected to this page. 
Ruthfulbarbarity 00:37, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation Page

message: The combination 666 was indeed drawn on 4/1/05 .  I'm re-adding that. --SamMichaels 21:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Evil Twin Skippy beat me to it :)  Instead, I added clarification that it was the nightly drawing. --SamMichaels 21:03, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: 666 drawing 4/1/05

message: Disagree with the proposed split here.  Nick Perry is only notable for this one incident, and in order to explain the scandal properly Nick Perry has to be discussed here anyway.  A split-off article would be, as it stands, would either be very short (unless his announcing career was a lot more notable than it seems) or else duplicate a lot of the content in this article.  I'd be opposed to it unless you or others have more information to add on Mr. Perry such that there began to be too much information on Perry that wasn't relevant to the scandal article.  As it stands, the brief background on Perry and his announcing career is relevant and would be included in this article anyway even if a Nick Perry article was spun off. SnowFire (talk) 13:47, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed split of Nick Perry
Talk:The Visualise Tour

message: This DVD does not star "Brian McFadden". He was only a guest at some shows. Harry** 10:40, 2 September 2006.
:He still stared on the DVD. Use Around the World (Mariah Carey DVD) for example, Olivia Newton-John ,Trey Lorenz and Brian McKnight were guests but they still get mentioned and also guest stars get included in movies. Lillygirl 6:36, 2 September 2006.
I've split the DVD into a separate article, The Visualise Tour: Live in Concert. This is common practice for the tours and DVD articles of Madonna, Cher, U2, etc. It also helps straighten out the categories.   Wasted Time R 13:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of transgender-support organizations

message: I wonder if I was too hasty here?  I'm reopening this for more. Friday (talk) 00:39, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I would at least try to get a few more people's opinions here before closing again. --Nishkid64 00:47, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm participating instead this time, I'll let somebody else close it. Friday (talk) 00:49, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclosing
Talk:Stellar Kart

message: The new album can be found on the torrent trackers and the quality is very good.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.191.125.33 (talk) 14:52, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The new album was leaked 

message: Adam, Cody, Brian, and Jordan all need their own wikipedia pages.  ~Chrissyy
I agree. -LLR  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.114.144.24 (talk) 21:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Members Seperate Pages 

message: What year did stellar kart form?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.65.47 (talk) 08:56, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formed 

message: who put "stellar kart is a satanic pop punk band" cant you at least source such a claim, plus they are christian actually, and that term would work better with fallout boy or the starting line, but to call an open christian band, satanic? thats just vandalism, im changing it back now. --thrice 34--  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thrice34 (talk • contribs) 11:39, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Satanic? 
Talk:Nicole C. Mullen

message: I tagged the date of birth in this article because Nicole has generally NOT been willing to share how old she is.  Her standard answer is "I'm older than Britany (sic) and younger than Janet" ; assuming this refers to Britney Spears (December 2, 1981) and Janet Jackson (May 16, 1966), the date given barely qualifies.  More importantly:  (a) At least three years of "happy birthday" posts on Nicole's official forum  indicate her birthday is January 3rd, not June 26th; and (b) certain other little-known facts in her life (let's just say they're related to the abusive past she mentioned in her recent Christianity Today interview , and leave it at that) suggest a birth year in the early-to-mid 1970's is more likely.  (Indeed, her abusive past may have something to do with why she's unwilling to give out her actual date of birth.)  Whoever provided the June 26, 1967 date, PLEASE provide a reference!  --RBBrittain 12:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also note that Nicole's IMDb page  shows a birthdate of January 3, 1964; though the month and day match up with the forum posts, the year does NOT match either her standard answer (it would make her OLDER than Janet) or the little-known facts I alluded to earlier.  Because her birthdate at IMDb is questionable, I'm not linking it in the article proper just yet; nor am I entering the complete birth name shown on IMDb (though Coleman is in fact her maiden name, and also the "C." in her current name).  --RBBrittain 05:12, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth
Talk:Point of Grace

message: Why was the article for the album 24 deleted? Thief12 12:36, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, it wasn't deleted, but it was edited out of the page. I just fixed that. Thief12 00:21, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article for an album deleted

message: I notice the song "I'll Be Believing" is referred to as a "#1" chart hit. My copy of Hot Hits by Jeffrey Brothers shows the tune peaking at #7 on the Christian Hit Radio chart on 11/15/93. I am guessing they're using Christian AC to arrive at that #1 rank? GBrady (talk) 08:20, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consensus for which chart is the "default" in article 

message: This article refers to "the girls" 46 times. Since they are really "the women," referring to them as the girls might be fine once or twice as an endearment, but not 46 times to the exclusion of anything else. In reality, whether girls, women, ladies, whatever, a little more creativity and less redundancy would be very helpful. Even the use of a simple "they" or "the group" would help vary things. This is not meant to be destructive criticism, but just to suggest improvement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.25.112.220 (talk) 06:37, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing Improvement
Talk:Horse Manure

message: Created page; EnjoyMasterEagle 00:53, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I've made this page a redirect because it adds no useful information on top of the Manure article, while simultaneously having poor style and being completely uncited. Still, at the moment, someone may search for this particular article name, so I'm not nominating it for deletion.  i kan reed 07:31, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Across the Sky

message: This page dose need to be expanded. They were not around long sort of a one album wonder.  But they were big for a couple dxnccbcis posted for deletion. Given time I think I could expand this article but it is about to get deleted so we'll see. BTW -- they were Dove Award Nominees.
I've added significant content and some refernces. In text citations need to be cleaned up. M-BMor 10:56, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: There are many pictures out there. I don't have the knowledge yet on how to add pics to an article. Is an album cover acceptab le fair use? If so I can get a j-peg together I just need to know how to add it in. M-BMor 03:57, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: What else could be added to this article? I am not sure what else to add. It seems relatively straight forward. M-BMor 03:57, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 
Talk:Race and intelligence/Archive 30

message: Seeing as we've snagged again on a Jencks/Phillips quote, can I suggest renaming the section "cultural, genetic or environmental?"  Jencks, and the concept of "labeling bias", denies the genetic as primary or significant, without resorting to saying it is "cultural"...although we mention the word environmental, perhaps we should have a new sub-section regarding environmental factors not related to culture? --JereKrischel 09:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Explanations is the best headline. No reason to force a false dichotomy. Arbor 11:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Explanations is fine, but the organization into two competing sets of hypotheses is probably necessary. Re: "labeling bias" -- as far as I can tell, this is a neologism that originated with and is only used by Jencks. It's not clear what the word refers to that would have been discussed by other researchers (i.e., it may only represent an opinion held by Jencks), so developing it into a major part of this summary style article is probably inappropriate (see section above). --Rikurzhen 17:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cultural, genetic, or environmental?

message: "Responding to such concerns, Dickens and Flynn 2001 have proposed a solution which rests on genotype-environment correlation, hypothesizing that small initial differences in environment cause feedback effects which magnify into large IQ differences.[73] Such differences would need to develop before age 3, when the Black-White IQ gap can be first detected."
1) I think the 3-year olds IQ difference (reading the Flynn article) is a controversial result.
2) you cannot use a controversial result to make factual statement like : "Such differences would need to develop before age 3, when the Black-White IQ gap can be first detected."
3) where is the citation for this statement: 'Such differences would need to develop before age 3, when the Black-White IQ gap can be first detected.' 
The 3-years olds issue feels to me like 'weasel-words'. How many large scale studies have been made on 3-year olds? Taking controversial studies on 3-year olds and then applying their results as truth to other parts of the article. Macgruder 11:33, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not know that the 3-year-old results were debated. Interesting. That being said, the sentence you point to indeed needs a source, otherwise that line of argument is indeed a clear example of Original Research (independently of whether Peoples et al. or Dickens and Flynn are right or not.) Arbor 12:17, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it! Rushton–Jensen make exactly this point in their PPP survey (p. 270). Peer-reviewed and all. Should be kosher for WP. Arbor 12:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 year olds and fallacy
Talk:Tree63

message: I think the Quotation marks of the song title and the quote are confusing.  Could something be done to fix this? G.O. 17:11, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Paragraph 

message: I can find no evidence that this is true so I have removed it. The references on the article about the song & awards do not specify that it was a specific recording which won the award. It may be an award for the song rather than a specific recording:
In 2005, Tree63's version of Matt Redman's song, "Blessed Be Your Name", was nominated for a Dove Award for "Song of the Year" and won the "Worship Song of the Year" award at the 36th GMA Dove Awards. Zabdiel (talk) 13:37, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards
Talk:Imperfection (Star Trek: Voyager)

message: Actually it's neither a production nor a continuity error - maybe a release error: Listening closely to the stardates given in Imperfection (54129.4), Drive (54058.6) and Repression (54090.4-54101), it is clear, that the events of Drive (including the Wedding of Tom and B'Elanna) happen chronologically before Imperfection (as do the events of Repression).
In any case, much more obvious than the wedding ring on Tom's hand is the existence of the Delta Flyer II, which would not be shown completed until Drive aired - and the previous one had already been destroyed by the Borg. Bernd Martin Wurm (talk) 11:56, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note on the Note:
Talk:Usborne Puzzle Adventure series

message: Made a quick edit here. Previously #20 was listed as "Agent Arthur's Mountain Mission / Voyage to the Edge of the World (announced but never published". I have a small collection of these books that I've held onto and had a look back. Book #1 lists 'Mountain Mission' as #20, however I do have a copy of 'Voyage to the Edge of the World' which is definitely book 20. 
From memory (backed by the above), Mountain Mission was to be the 20th but for whatever reason it was replaced by Voyage. I've therefore moved the 'never published' note to follow Mountain Mission and added in the ISBN for Voyage into the article. 
Hope this helps :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brahber (talk • contribs) 08:50, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book #20 

message: Would these additional series come under this heading? Same format, and publishing time? Noble Kale 01:12, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No; although they are similar there are no set puzzles to solve.  Add these as a new link on Usborne Publishing. Burns flipper 07:27, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I have moved these entries out to their own articles as they are not Puzzle Adventures.Burns flipper 08:35, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whodunnits, and Spinechillers 

message: I seem to remember another "Puzzle Adventures" series. I can't remember much about it other than that it was an easier version of the normal ones and almost all of the titles began with "Puzzle" (one was Puzzle Island, I think another was Puzzle Planet). I remember it was meant for younger readers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lord Seth (talk • contribs) 
:I've just looked these up on Amazon, and they seem to be called the "Usborne Young Puzzles" series, as opposed to the "Usborne Young Puzzle Adventures" listed in this article. (Does the lack of "... Adventure" mean they should be listed separately? Hmm.) Their titles do indeed begin with "Puzzle" and these are the ones I've found:
:* Puzzle Planet 
:* Puzzle Ocean 
:* Puzzle Mountain 
:* Puzzle World  - an omnibus including
:** Puzzle Island 
:** Puzzle Farm 
:** Puzzle Town 
:* Puzzle Journey Around the World 
:* Puzzle Pyramid 
:* Puzzle Castle 
:* Puzzle School 
:* Puzzle Jungle 
:* Puzzle Dungeon 
:* Puzzle Palace 
:* Puzzle Car Race 
:* Puzzle Train 
:* Puzzle Holiday 
:* Puzzle Dinosaurs 
:* Puzzle Pirates 
:If we decide they're appropriate for this article, we should probably add these in... -- KittyRainbow (talk) 22:53, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, these are the "Young Puzzle" series.  Please add these to the Usborne Young Puzzle series article. Burns flipper (talk) 12:18, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other series?