lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:De Morgan's laws

message: GrkCan's paragraph from July 2020 on the Substitution form really does not make a lot of sense. What is it trying to say? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.235.239.193 (talk) 11:08, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Substitution form paragraph 

message: The proposition "The complement of the union of two sets is the same as the intersection of their complements " is False. Boutarfa1 (talk) 12:03, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: In the proposition "the complement of the intersection of two sets is the union of the complements of the given sets " some conditions should   be precised like that the complements of the given sets can be from the same set as well as the complement of the intersection(some other conditions are possible like when the complement of  the intersection is taken from a set that is included in the set that the   complements of the given sets are  taken from). Boutarfa1 (talk) 12:24, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: Like halfway through the article there's a big red error. Someones gotta fix that and its not gonna be me76.89.144.233 (talk) 00:59, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in article 

message: I might be worthwhile mentioning somewhere here that in a digital circuit, the logical meaning of voltage levels is arbitrary: you can treat a physical high as a logical 1 or as a logical 0. To convert a '1=high' circuit to '1=low', replace each OR with an AND and each AND with an OR (treating other gates as combinations of AND, OR, and NOT). 203.13.3.93 (talk) 03:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  negative logic 

message: "Not Both" is the same as "Either Not"
"Not Either" is the same as "Both Not"
203.13.3.93 (talk) 02:36, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Or ...
Talk:Arrondissement

message: We need to standardize how they are referred to in text. Options are:
* 20th arrondissement
* XXe arrondissement (usually written like this in french)
* XXth arrondissement (a sort of mix n match)
:Not the mix-and-match, please; that will look wrong to almost everyone. I'm neutral as between the other two.
::I'd go for XXe. For English-speakers it's quite normal (not particularly pretentious) to say "We stayed in a lovely hotel in the quinzième."
:::Since no one expressed otherwise, I think I'll be bold and standardize on XXe arrondissement and move the articles to XXe arrondissement (Paris). _R_ 20:25, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm, actually I'll make it XXe arrondissement since I don't foresee the need for any disambiguation. _R_ 21:23, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style for names 

message: "French" is a proper noun in English, and needs to be capitalized. 71.156.15.166 22:03, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. SCHZMO ✍ 22:05, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "french language country subdivisions" 

message: is kaymakam a same rank for arrondisments?--3210 06:51, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  kaymakam is equall 

message: In various articles I see arrondissement and arrondissment (no "e" between "diss" and "ment").  Which is right?  Are both right? Jordan Brown (talk) 17:43, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling? 

message: It seems there is an issue between this article, when it sets "Each of Cameroon's departments are subdivided into arrondissments: they sit above subdistricts and communes in Cameroon's structure" and Communes of Cameroon, that sets "The Communes of Cameroon are the third-level units of administration in Cameroon", i.e. communes sit above arrondissments (or maybe they are the same thing ....) Mac9  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.97.235.4 (talk) 09:58, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrondissement & Communes of Cameroon 

message: Luxembourg appears to be missing from this article, despite having arrondissements judiciaires (per French Wikipedia). 216.15.48.194 (talk) 02:18, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luxembourg 

message: This article appears to be missing the arrondissements of Guadeloupe/Martinique. Would it be better to place that information under the France or North America heading? Aricardo1917 (talk) 17:15, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  French West Indies
Talk:Politics of Cambodia

message: Don't mean to be controversial here, but why on Earth does this article detail the diplomatic representation between Cambodia and the USA?  I would like to point out that there are other countries - in the interests of neutrality, either all of them or none of them should be listed - ThievingGypsy 19:24, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: On behalf of the Rest of the World

message: Made a couple of small changes and removed two links under official - 1 was the Cambodia E-gov site that was already listed and the other was a link to an opinion piece. Aoi, if you are still around I'd be interested in working on the article some more. It could use some cutting down - 2003 national assembly election results? but no other election? - and some additions with a little more NPOV feel. Paxse 16:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor Changes

message: Should this site be added? It has questionable authority, I think, but it bears looking at. Blast [improve me]  04.05.07 0407 (UTC)
Thanks for that link. Very interesting, I've never seen it before. However, it probably belongs over at Khmer Krom rather than here. Paxse 17:11, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link 

message: In December 2020, Reywas reverted me –  – without discussing the appropriate reasons for such reversion on the talk page. The edits restored by the aforementioned editor are particularly unsuitable for the lead as the purpose of this article is to describe the political structure prevalent in the country in constitutional and legal terms (see Politics of Vietnam and Politics of United States as examples). In this context, please see also the last portion of the lede that includes academic references to the works of Levitsky and Way who describe Cambodia as a "competitive authoritarian" regime. I have reverted the changes made and have initiated this discussion here with the hope that any pending issues will be resolved through discussion rather than through continuous reversion of edits.  — Nearly Headless Nick {c} 15:19, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede
Talk:Geography of Jordan

message: There are conflicting data on the area of Jordan. The article "Geography of Jordan" says it is 91,880 km2, the article "Jordan" says it is 89,342 km2, but the 12 governorates listed in "Administrative divisions of Jordan" make together only 88,779 km2. May somebody from Jordan check the numbers? Pomimo (talk) 13:23, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area of the kingdom
Talk:Render

message: These articles use the term render to mean producing audio, rather than graphics, but I am unsure how to link/disambiguate it: Surround sound, Scream in Blue, Epigonion, Sound film, Personal Audio, JMusic, SoundRenderer, DLS format, OpenAL, DirectX/DirectSound, Windows legacy audio components along with Template:IOS 7
I found some quick references: Introduction to Sound Rendering - UNC Computer Science, , Distributed 3D Audio Rendering - Conferences
I haven't found a Wikipedia article on it, though, so is it in another article, too obscure or otherwise not qualified to be here, or just not made, yet? Even Wiktionary doesn't list audio rendering in the definition of render, except maybe under translation. It sometimes is used to mean causing, as in rendered worthless, but I don't really see that, either... Is there enough reason to warrant a new article, or maybe a redlink on this page somewhere, would it be better to just unlink the term, or is there some place to link that I missed? Thanks for input. -PC-XT+ 08:04, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audio Rendering?
Talk:Barn-owl

message: given that the Strigidae is at True owl, should we move Barn-owl to Common Barn-owl and then Tytonidae to Barn-owl for consistency's sake?  - Metanoid (talk, email) 18:42, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This was recently proposed at Talk:Barn Owl#Article name and didn't garner any support. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 22:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Back in the mists of time, the two articles were originally "Barn Owl" and "barn owls" - full circle? Jimfbleak (talk) 06:31, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move it 

message: This video has a barn owl -- lots of images
http://www.wimp.com/catowl/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skysong263 (talk • contribs) 06:39, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Owl & Pussycat video
Talk:Muskeg

message: I think this article sohuld meniton the phenomenom of pieces of floating Muskeg breaking off and floating out into the water, forming small floating islands. Does anyone know if this phenomenom has a name? When I was younger I lived near a lake which had an extensive floating muskeg at one either end, and seasonal winds would cause independent pieces of the muskeg to float from one end of the lake to the other.
Walkersam 00:48, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free-floating Muskeg 

message: and removed tag. Discovered article while working on "hanging swamp". Julia Rossi (talk) 08:00, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Added sections

message: Muskeg is a cree word, right? The origin and meaning of the word should be noted at the top of the article, I should think.
Pazouzou (talk) 02:18, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Algonkian loanwords 

message: Image caption is as follows: Heavy equipment breaking through thawing muskeg in Wabasca Oil Field in Alberta. This should be Heavy equipment broke through thawing muskeg in Wabasca Oil Field in Alberta. Ie it broke the surface of the ground and partial sank, whereas breaking through infers that it was being dug out. Gorilla (talk) 08:57, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Badly Captioned Images

message: The language used to describe muskeg is not written in the required encyclopedic writing style. It is also inaccurate. There is certainly nothing "unearthly" about it, comparisons to bonsai trees inappropriate, and moose are highly adapted to muskeg.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.40.130.133 (talk) 15:48, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: @204.40.130.133 I came to the talk section to lodge this exact observation. "closer look reveals a bizarre and almost unearthly landscape" is very out of place. Qu1xand (talk) 14:16, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-encyclopedic language style used in description 

message: The current Russian interwiki is Сфагновые болота - I'm not sure it fully, or at all, corresponds to "muskeg". I'd be grateful for experts to check! --CopperKettle (talk) 04:33, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the Russian interwiki correct?
Talk:Richard Dadd

message: Is there a reason he isn't categorised as a British murderer? If not I'll add it. I realise he was mentally unstable but the article says he confessed to 'murder' and not 'homicide due to diminished responsibility...' so the cat would be fair.  Malick78 (talk) 11:40, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cat
Talk:Germanic

message: What is this page for? --Uri
 
Looks like it was just a random dump of a letter. Q: Should this page be redirected somewhere or just deleted? Generally adjectives are not used as the names of encyclopedia  
acticles. What do you think? --mav
I suggest redirecting to Germanic languages. -phma
:That fits with most of the pages that currently link there; I have made such a redirect. --Brion VIBBER
::Some mean German instead of Germanic. I've added a "see also". --Roland2 11:03, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: From the edit history: "see-also blocks are maybe not ideal to have on a disambiguation page; Germans already linked to". Where should the disambiguation between Germanic and German be placed? The link to "Germans" will not help much, I think. See for example the - in my opinion - incorrect use of "Germanic" on page Tracht. --Roland2 16:40, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)

message: A "German chair" and a "Germanic chair" are not the same. "Germanic" is not an adjective of either Germany or Germans. Rex 13:42, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  German vs Germanic
Talk:L cut

message: this section (which currently makes up the bulk of the article) is so badly written, unencyclopedic, inappropriate and biased that it needs a _major_ rewrite. in the hope that this will happen, i'm leaving the text as it is now, but basically it has to go.
:Rewrite? It needs to be deleted, as it is not relevant nor necessary. I'll be bold and go ahead and make that "change". --Chromium 22:22, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  How To Create L Cuts 

message: Split Editing should be the major category for J cut and L cut. Examples illustrating the „J shape“ and „L shape“ trimming are given in http://pinnaclestudio.helpmax.net/en/video-clips/advanced-timeline-editing/split-editing/. Tags: split edit, J-cut, L-cut.
Peterkarl (talk) 13:17, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing major category
Talk:Pilgrims (Plymouth Colony)

message: This may be clear to readers more acquainted with these details than I, but it was and is unclear to me. In the article, "...  the ship was anchored in Provincetown Harbor by November 11/21." made me wonder "what the heck does 11/21 mean? A quick look at the cited source which can be seen online did not clear that up for me. Digging around, I found , where I see: "Saturday, Aug.  12/22. Made port at Dartmouth MAY-FLOWER in company.  Came to anchor near MAY-FLOWER." I don't understand the similarly confusing notation there saying 12/22, but it seems to conflict with 11/21. Also, I see similar notation elsewhere in the article (e.g., "They resumed exploration on Monday, December 11/21") which I don't follow.
Please clarify this. If this is a common notational convention which is understood by those properly clued-in, a clarifying footnote with a clue for readers not in that group might be helpful. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 11:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notational clarification needed 

message: This expression, cited right before footnote number [5], seems anachronistic, given the decimalization of the pound sterling only in 1971.  Would it not be better to express it this way: one shilling (12 pence; about £20.00 today)? 173.243.188.17 (talk) 13:31, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  “one shilling (£0.05; about £20.00 today)” 

message: Has there been any ancestry DNA test done on Pilgrims remains to figure out what their real ethnicity was? 50.44.242.105 (talk) 01:30, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Why does that matter? They were Europeans. Nothing else to be said, Probably English and Dutch 2601:8C:981:A3C0:D458:61A5:6817:34FB (talk) 17:28, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specific ethnicity of the pilgrims, germanic or celtic?
Talk:Michael Jackson

message: Change Joseph to Joe.
Michael Jackson's middle name is Joe, not Joseph. 
This comes from court documents. Mjsmyidol (talk) 00:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Which document(s) are you referring to? Last I checked, "Joe" was an alternate middle name used while the more formal "Joseph" was his legal name, but either way links would be helpful. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 00:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 24 April 2024 

message: Hello. I noticed the nickname "King of Pop" is emboldened and not link. Do you think it should be linked to Honorific nicknames in popular music without being in bold face? Other singer article FAs like Mariah Carey, Regine Velasquez, and Kyla are linked to the aforementioned list of nicknames in music without being in bold text. What can you say? ScarletViolet (t • c) 12:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I saw in a previous edit summary, the lack of a link is because "King of Pop" already redirects to this page. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 12:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead section concern (again) 

message: This can be added to the best selling artist page, but we have a more recent reliable source citing that Jackson sold over 500 million records. It's from spring of 2024 by a reliable source in Yahoo
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/moonwalk-neverland-10-things-michael-163000315.html
Never17 (talk) 19:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor 

message: Remove the red links of Big News Network in 95 reference and Brittany Spanos in 182 reference! 2804:1B3:9601:37FD:A599:29E6:5980:1205 (talk) 01:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks for pointing those out, especially when both pages have been deleted. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 02:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 May 2024
Talk:Black supremacy

message: Lets be clear here: Its a racial supremacist AND racist belief. So lets add those two words. Lets not bend over backwards to not write "racist", thats silly. It is a racist belief. Just like White Supremacy is racist. There is *no* consensus in sociology that racism must be based on the "predominantly powerful race in the respective location" and even if there was, this is a global website. It cant be based with any particular place in mind such as the US. Thus, it must be classified as racist no different to any other race superiority worldview. 
Cheers,
DJ 77.20.155.35 (talk) 19:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There is actually no agreement among sources that 'black supremacy' - as an ideology, belief or movement - as opposed to an occasional rhetorical stance - actually meaningfully exists. If it did, it would probably be 'racist', but we would expect sources to say that - rather than what was 'clear' semantically. Pincrete (talk) 06:06, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It’s called the Nation of Islam. 2601:201:8101:E5E0:5908:AE1F:A6D3:AFD1 (talk) 08:57, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: yup Xvfumes (talk) 04:28, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Specifically, to whites, hispanics are seen in a closer "view", if you can call it that. Like Black Hebrew Israelites, very similar considering both are from an own sect of their base religions. Xvfumes (talk) 04:30, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Bear in mind that article talk pages exist solely to discuss how to improve articles; they are not for general discussion about the subject of the article! Pincrete (talk) 06:18, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "racial supremacist" -> "racial supremacist and racist" 

message: Add the Black power sidebar.
 12.110.37.79 (talk) 09:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.Pincrete (talk) 15:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 2 May 2024
Talk:Accrington Stanley F.C.

message: I noticed that there was a sentence that is obviously out of place as it refers to the 2003 season but was sitting in the middle of a section concerning the period 1974-78.
The sentence reads:
"In 2003, Accrington played Manchester United and won 1-0; this was the club's biggest upset ever."
According to the Editing History, this was added by user 125.239.223.246 at 07:21 15 May 2012.  As I do not know enough about the history of your club, I cannot tell whether the sentence is correct or whether it is a bit of un-noticed vandalism.  It seems odd - the sentence would look out of context even if moved into its correct season in the text. Maybe it's just sloppy editing.
I have moved it to the end of the History and Re-formation section and surrounded it with white space so that it sticks out and someone can sort it out. Freeman501 (talk) 17:57, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentence out of place
Talk:Dozens (game)

message: The dozens that I learned a long time ago  has some of its roots in African American slaves teaching the young men in particular to just take the barrage of insults without reacting as they would be continuously insulted by whites of all ages but could never react as it could be deadly. A dozen older slaves would verbally assault the victim to toughen them. 2602:306:CE95:57B0:58AC:6F32:57CC:D153 (talk) 22:55, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing context 

message: The dozens that I learned a long time ago  has some of its roots in African American slaves teaching the young men in particular to just take the barrage of insults without reacting as they would be continuously insulted by whites of all ages but could never react as it could be deadly. A dozen older slaves would verbally assault the victim to toughen them. 108.233.85.123 (talk) 22:56, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing context
Talk:Choctaw

message: I'm a Choctaw-speaking Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma citizen. Can we reorder the four nations by federal recognition status and then by population? 12.197.206.130 (talk) 23:28, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like the three tribes are listed in the intro by size, in the history section by year recognized, and in the external links alphabetically. You can probably change any of these orders if there’s a logical reason to do so. Yuchitown (talk) 05:11, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorder the tribes by either population or recognition
Talk:Sodium

message: "Bulk sodium is sometimes stored in oil or under and inert gas, which are the conditions it is usually stored in."
I can't edit this page 134.134.137.87 (talk) 23:49, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:47, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enormous typo 

message: https: //youtu.be/IaP3lGfa2n0 2600:1700:F7D0:F30:A4FA:76A1:45A9:BB48 (talk) 18:43, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A link to a video of sodium exploding. 

message: Please change from (from Latin natrium) to (from Latin natrium). We may not know what Latin is. 2001:EE0:4BC9:11A0:C19F:C86:76EB:92C7 (talk) 10:52, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 November 2023 

message: Add pronunciation of sodium to make readers understand. 2001:EE0:4BC9:4070:C19F:C86:76EB:92C7 (talk) 12:39, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Unnecessary per MOS:LEADPRON. Liu1126 (talk) 13:54, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Refer to Potassium as an example to find out why it is pronunced. 2001:EE0:4BC9:4070:8C60:E4FE:CDA3:8239 (talk) 14:53, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 November 2023 

message: Change the current source code to (from Neo-Latin ). Open the source dialog to know what code I used. 2001:EE0:4BC4:4240:71D2:A29:A5C4:100E (talk) 14:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: M.Bitton (talk) 16:32, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request
Talk:List of British comedians

message: Many comedians could be included under several headings. Should they be included under all apropriate catergories or just under the one that seems most apropriate. I personally favor the first option but I would be interested in what other wikipedians think. Saul Taylor
:I think the first is probably the way to go.  The exception to this would be if someone did a bit of one genre, as part of your 'act', that doesn't qualify them for that category.  You aren't an impressionist if you do the odd impression of Tony Blair, or a musical comedian, if you just do the odd comic song (so the Two Ronnies aren't, for example).  Silverfish 12:05, 9 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: 2003 comment on structure

message: Where is Jimmy Wheeler, both in your Lisdt of British Comedians & in your List of comedians (English language)
David Gregory. 27th January 2012 41.133.46.221 (talk) 08:27, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jimmy Wheeler 1910-1970 

message: Not sure where the best place to add these people is but I think they should be included on this page of lists
Joe Pasquale
Les Dennis
Max Boyce
Hattie Jaques
Colin Crompton
Ken Goodwin
especially when others (e.g Craig Charles) get multiple entries
Lurcio (talk) 16:42, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing names
Talk:Erdoğan Atalay

message: Merci 142.54.206.140 (talk) 18:36, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks