lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Deathmatch Classic

message: "Also includes two multiplayer games: Half-Life 2 Deathmatch and Half-Life 1 Deathmatch: SourceTM." 
It's official.
: HL1:DM is an entirely different mod from DMC.
:: How can you prove that?
::: Try playing either of the two, see the difference.
:::: Or, to add to this illustrious conversation, you could examine the Steam listings for these different games. Each are independent of the other.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.239.183.126 (talk) 21:48, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  To further "prove" it one can look at the release dates.  HL1:DM is simply Half-Life's original multi-player mode which was part of the game when it was released in 1998.  DMC didn't come out until years later (the 2001 Half-Life patch described in this article).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.247.221.200 (talk) 04:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Just look here to see proof: http://store.steampowered.com/app/40/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.137.64.249 (talk) 02:35, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  HL1:DM Source 

message: Attention, all contributors to the Valve Task Force and the articles it constitutes!
I am here to announce that I will be re-vitalizing the Valve Task Force, aimed at universally improving articles constituting Valve Corporation, their employees, associates and products. This specific task force has been dormant for quite some time and with two very notable releases coming out this year, I feel like this is the appropriate time to re-stimulate the general aim of this group. For those who are not already members of the Valve Task Force, feel free to add your name to our members list and contribute to whatever articles you feel your contributions may prove beneficial for. Valve, its products and notable employees have proven to be essential to the progression of the video game industry, so I'd like to make a call of arms for this cause. DarthBotto talk•cont 22:13, 08 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valve Task Force Re-vitalization
Talk:Ein al-Zeitun massacre

message: Source should be given exactly on what pages and who claim that.Shrike 18:40, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The flight theory 

message: A recent edit by User:Ynhockey misleads the reader to think that Palestinian sources dispute the massacre and claims only one casualty. This is incorrect for two reasons:
#The given source does not deny the massacre, it merely neglects to mention it.
#The given source is by no means an authority on the subject, unlike the two references by Palestinian authors.
I am reverting.--Doron 20:47, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted edit
Talk:Cpio

message: CPIO is really this article, isn't it? 129.241.158.188 21:34, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicated

message: Commnad "cpio -l" doesn't work
78.60.37.58 (talk) 16:10, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake in the article 

message: % find . -depth -print | cpio -ov > tree.cpio
Seems to me that cpio is going to include the destination file (at least part of it) in itself with this command.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by P4p4 n0eL (talk • contribs) 01:50, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self inclusion problem 

message: Cpgz redirects to this article, which doesn't mention "cpgz". -- Hoary (talk) 02:02, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The article used to say this: "Like the tar format, cpio archives are often compressed using gzip and distributed as .cpgz (or .cpio.gz) files." (See .) That sentence apparently was lost in a rewrite. – Tea2min (talk) 09:29, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Cpgz?

message: And is it worth mentioning that this is associated with an initial ram file system on some flavors of linux?
as seen here: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/24029
How to unpack and repack an initial ramdisk (initrd/initramfs) image?
...
Then uncompress and extract the initrd:
Raw
# zcat /boot/initrd-2.6.18-164.6.1.el5.img | cpio -idmv
...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.198.94.50 (talk) 01:37, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  and INITRD ...
Talk:John Norris (Royal Navy officer)

message: This page: http://www.nmm.ac.uk/mag/pages/mnuExplore/PaintingDetail.cfm?lettera=k&ID=BHC2912&name=George%20Knapton&action=ArtistTitle says he was born likely in 1660 , not 1670. 
// Fred-Chess 21:02, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Heathcote also says 1660 but both ODNB and DCB say 1670/71. Dormskirk (talk) 20:32, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Perhaps promotions were temporary then?
London Gazette 6630 page 3 appears to appoint him Admiral in December 1727, long after other sources say he attained the rank.
Had his previous commission lapsed?LE (talk) 17:27, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appointed/reappointed?
Talk:Graham Coxon

message: I just saw them all performing live on BBC1, on Friday Night with Jonathon Ross, I hadn't heard anything about this, something needs to be added to the article! This is a pretty amazing super group! Does anybody have any better photographs than the one used?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iheartsausages (talk • contribs) 14:09, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: work with Paul Weller, Mani and Zak Starkey?

message: Regarding the deletion log made by admin SlimVirgin on BLP Graham Coxon, user Suzi Grossman should provide further clarification on claim that 'the section about him having a daughter born in 2016 is factually incorrect our client sees this as abusive and is causing upset to him and his family'. Several other sources cite the birth of a child on 2016. User should clarify whether (a) the year of birth is inaccurate or (b) reports about the birth were fictitious and fall under vandalism guidelines. In case of the latter, record should be made that such reports reports are in fact false so that other publications can make similar revisions. Furthermore, the information on remainder of the session ('personal life') are citable and verifiable so removal of the whole paragraph was arguably not necessary unless user has provided further reasoning.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.197.251.249 (talk) 17:24, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graham Coxon Deletion Log 

message: Should there be a new picture? This one seems kind of outdated. Rowdythere (talk) 15:01, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture?
Talk:Polans

message: I suggest moving this to Polans (disambiguation) and having Polans as a redirect to Polans (eastern) with "otheruses" on top of course. Eastern tribe seem a more likely aim of the search but please object if I am wrong. 
Since the entry is empty the move does not require a vote. I just don't want to make life more difficult if this move seems controversial. So, I would like to hear if there are objections. --Irpen 21:13, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither meaning is primary outside its geographical context, so it's not a case of primary topic disambiguation. · Naive cynic · 21:49, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, the descendants of the western Polans might have a different view on that. Halibutt 19:24, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Nyah, you suggested, which is a different thing ;) Halibutt 04:53, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: By the 9th century, the Polans were ruled by the Khazars paid tribute to them
What?
Urpunkt (talk) 01:28, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Khazars
Talk:Forever Free (novel)

message: Bold text
Haldeman butchered the ending. silsor 21:20, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite. —Cryptic (talk) 09:23, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  This book is proof that any science fiction novel with God as a character sucks. -- llywrch (talk) 00:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Forever Free is much shorter than the preceding book and its ending involves an archtypical Deus Ex Machina." Reads a bit too much like a sentence found in a book review. Drop the size of book comparison and instead just stating "archtypical Deus Ex Machina", describe the circumstances, this is in the spoils section. Jon 16:39, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's not much more to say about it, it really is that bad.  After a series of increasingly bizarre events, God Himself jumps out of the pantry and says "LOL, I DID IT!"  The End.  Now aren't you glad you didn't buy the book? silsor 22:27, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: When I read it, back in the day - I remember it was a great mystery to see what was causing all these things. I remember thinking the whole 'God did it' explination was the BIGGEST cop-out I had ever seen. I'm still pissed about it. Raul654 05:17, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: sentence needs reworked

message: Should there be a Disimbaguation for this title?  There is another book called Forever Free by Joy Adamson and is the third book in the Born Free series. Lighthope 05:43, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disimbaguation needed?
Talk:Calpain

message: I said "found in the brain" because that's the only tissue i'm sure it's found in.  It may be in other tissues as well.  If you have evidence for that, will you add it please?  also, stroke and head injury may not be the only times it's activated in excess. --Delldot 21:27, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The text is full of numerical references that are not listed below. Please, fix that. Bruno Ramos 03:11, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that a user added content from his/her thesis, but did not include the references. I have reverted to the last version before those additions. --Arcadian 14:54, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References Missing 

message: This text refers to the P1 and P2 position on the molecule but as far as I can determine there is no explanation of what these are anywhere in wikipedia, including on the protein page. Could this please be rectified?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.159.165.35 (talk) 03:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  P1 and P2 

message: I am not sure where to best provide this feedback, but it seems that there are a range of pages that contain mislabeled link boxes. The links in the section "Available PDB structures" don't go to any of the PDB sites, but to PDBsum. I suggest renaming the section to "Links to PDBsum" and adding another section that redirects to the PDB, similar to what is available for many other protein related pages, e.g. SHC1 --Andorsch (talk) 21:28, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links mislabeled 

message: "tertiary structure elements rather than primary amino acid sequences are likely responsible for directing cleavage to a specific substrate." This exact phrase is found in an uncited research paper with the DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1301419  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.65.169.22 (talk) 23:07, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism
Talk:Kampong Glam

message: Is "Kampong Gelam" an alternative spelling? Thanks --Dpr 21:30, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Songs of Love and Hate

message: The assertion is made that "In the 1996 book Various Positions, Cohen biographer Ira Nadel confirms that many of the songs were from an earlier period, with "Joan of Arc" having been written at the Chelsea in New York".
Surely no-one refers to Chelsea as "the Chelsea". Is it not far more likely that the wikitext should be "having been written at the Chelsea in Manhattan"? Harfarhs (talk) 05:15, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Recording and composition' section
Talk:Organic acid anhydride

message: I was going to stick something like this in the article and then I realized that it is kinda crazy.  It would be nice to figure out a way of describing mixed anhydrides without describing all matter!
Classically, mixed anhydrides arise from the dehydration of two different oxy acids:
:2 XOH  +  YOH  →  XOY  +  H2O
Again, in principle, this conversion could desribe the formation of a large number of binary oxides.
*Example:
:HNO2  +  H2SO4  →  ONHSO4 ( = ONOSO2OH)  +  H2O
The scope of the mixed anhydrides is even greater when one considers the possibility of one of the acids not being an hydroxyl acid.
:XOH  +  YH  →  XY  +  H2O
*Example:
:HNO2  +  HCl  → NOCl  +  H2O
This analysis suggests that all chemical compounds could in fact be described as acid anhydrides.
--Smokefoot 23:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure how to respond to this.  You should look at the article on inorganic acidic anhydrides (if you're still reading Wikpedia). Shalom (Hello • Peace) 22:25, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Taking this article to absurd limits?

message: I had the vague idea (from high school chemistry) that an anhydride was "an acid minus one or more H2O's".  That definition is obviously too general, but the one given in the article seems too narrow.  For example, maleic anhydride and mellitic anhydride do not fit the diagram given.  At a minimum, the definition must be modified to allow those "self-anhydrides". All the best, --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 02:02, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought it was fine about four years ago, but some guy changed it all around to concentrate only on the organic part. Despite what some people may think, there's no conflict in definition between organic and inorganic chemistry.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.2.172.2 (talk) 20:52, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

text: there is no article on anhydrides, someone changed it to redirect  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.180.238.179 (talk) 01:23, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition is too narrow? 

message: This article starts with a round definition, as 'anhydride' and 'acid anhydride' redirect here!--130.88.141.224 (talk) 17:15, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirects
Talk:Amancay

message: This is in the process of being written. There are links pointing to it. Jclerman 21:44, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't delete article 

message: === Image #1 ===
Don't delete: It is being used in other article(s) and the file
description says:
This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons. The description on its description page there is shown below.  
Name Alstromeria aurantiaca 
Family Amaryllidaceae 
Image no. 1.
Permission granted to use under GFDL by Kurt Stueber
Source: www.biolib.de
:::It has been replaced by a better image. For (C) info see the author's permission in the image file. Jclerman 00:56, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright ''violations'' 

message: Don't delete: It is being used in other article(s) and the file
description says:
This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons. The description on its description page there is shown below.  
Name Alstromeria aurantiaca 
Family Amaryllidaceae 
Image no. 1.
Permission granted to use under GFDL by Kurt Stueber
Source: www.biolib.de
:::It has been replaced by a better image. For (C) info see the author's permission in the image file. Jclerman 00:56, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image #1 

message: Don't delete. There is no copyright violation.
Jclerman 09:51, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darwin's quote
Talk:Geo Storm

message: Grammar Edit
The last sentance in the article said
Although these inexpensive cars fewer options for aftermarket parts than other compact cars, there is a small group of owners who modify Storms to increase their performance.
I am rewording this to say
There is a small group of owners who modify Storms to increase their performance, despite the fact that they have fewer aftermarket parts than other types of compact cars. 
I believe this improves the flow because   
.1) It avoids using the word "cars" twice in the same phrase
.2) avoids refering to the storm as a "sport compact", thus avoiding useless flamewars.
If you dislike this wording, please explain why below Evenprime 19:30, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reviewed and copyedited this fine article.  --SFoskett 21:21, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  older comments 

message: I think it is safe to say that this is a featured article, judging by the comments. --Karrmann
:Please leave the decisions to community concensus and the featured article director, User:Raul654, who keeps this sort of thing organised. You've been reverted twice and informed that this isn't a featured article. Thanks. Rob Church 16:21, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  featured article 

message: There are plenty better pictures of our cars. and I would like them to be put on this page rather then one that is missing a center hub cover. 
[IMG]http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h294/chances_storm/MODIFIEDGSIWITHNEWRIMS-1.jpg[/IMG]
 Though I agree the main page could use a better picture, the object is to provide a historical stock image of the car, not a modified car slammed on dubs  -Jgregg 21:14, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  BETTER PICS 

message: It's odd. Practically every car ever mass produced is still on the road in some fashion.
The paragraph makes it sound like theres tons of these around. The fact is that I haven't noticed one in quite a while, and a quick search on eBay as of 1/08/08 12:48 EST, theres one on there, for "parts or repair.
I'm not "hatin" on it. As a car associated with GM, though not quite a GM product, I think it was a good car in it's time, but like any other FWD, 4 cylinder gasoline car over 15 years old, theres not many of them around.  24.185.28.136 (talk) 05:50, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Still on the Road" section
Talk:Nez Perce National Historical Park

message: The correct spelling of this United States National Park is without the accent. I have tried discussing this with several editors and they have changed every one of the titles and occurrences of the tribal name.
A name is a name. You may use the accent to describe the French term for the origin of the tribal name, but the agency in charge of this park spells it with the Americanized name.
Robbie Giles 22:01, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The Federal website spells it Nez Perce and that is also the preferred spelling by tribal members--MONGO 12:42, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tiksi Airport

message: I am developing and fine-tuning this page to get the templates and layout optimized before I upload the entire series of Soviet air bases to Wikipedia. -Timvasquez 22:11, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Death of a Ladies' Man (album)

message: "Among the seven unknown outtakes is probably "Do I Have to Dance All Night"" <- what does this mean?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.215.162.119 (talk) 19:44, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Odd sentence

message: "Produced by the storied Phil Spector, it was a surprise to some fans when the typically minimalist Cohen was surrounded completely by Spector's Wall of Sound."
:Did this album "put people off?" I have heard many fans were dissapointed by the sound. I can compare it with the sort of surprise the Bob Dylan fans got with Dylan's own double album Self Portrait.
::It's an acquired taste. I do wish the sound were better, though. – Hattrem 23:47, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Putting poeple off 

message: I wanted to bring attention to a album by Mike Randal called "My Music Loves Me (even if I don't)" http://www.artistdirect.com/nad/store/artist/album/0,,1006187,00.html  
The album art is a direct homage to the Death of a Ladies Man album cover.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.174.206.124 (talk) 08:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mike Randal - 'My music Loves me (even if I dont) 

message: Why is "Death of a Ladies' Man" in the second paragraph redirected to "promiscuity"? I do realize that "ladies' man" is used to refer to male promiscuity, but the way this information presents itself is really confusing right now. Keith Galveston (talk) 11:03, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A strange link 

message: Is the current CD edition remastered, as is the case for most of L.C.'s pre-1990 albums? --109.193.211.159 (talk) 09:01, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remastered version? 

message: The Reception section says the album received negative reviews during its release. The reviews in the review box seem to contrast from that statement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.47.251.142 (talk) 04:10, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The reviews with links are most likely more recent reviews (with the exception of the review by Christgau). More recent reviewers have much kinder in their assessment of the album than the reviews that came out upon the album's release. Allmusic.com gives the album particularly high praise. But Christgau's review is much more ambiguous. Though he gave the album a B grade, he called it "bad music."Jpcohen (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: "Listen Phil, if you're goin' to kill me, kill me, " Leonard remarked dryly, "but don't fuck with me ears. I need 'em."
I was surprised to see this being attributed to Leonard Cohen, I always heard it being attributed to John Lennon (and a quick check online shows multiple examples where this is the case).
Lennon / Leonard?  Anyone have the book in question so we can verify this? David T Tokyo (talk) 10:12, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phil Spector quote
Talk:1974 Atlantic hurricane season

message: A quick glance at the data seems to suggest that either the timeline or the dates for the individual storms are wrong and don't match up.
76.181.244.197 (talk) 16:15, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tropical Depression Seventeen Missing + Wrong Data 
Talk:1973 Atlantic hurricane season

message: Please see Talk:1967 Atlantic hurricane season#Ginger or Christine?. Jamie|C 12:35, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ginger or Christine?

message: HURDAT says Alpha. Which is correct?Potapych (talk) 15:51, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alpha or Alfa 

message: I've added it to most of the images, but it's rough around the edges. –Juliancolton | Talk 03:14, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alt text 

message: I propose merging Hurricane Fran (1973) into 1973 Atlantic hurricane season since it has no claim to notability.Flux55 (talk) Flux55 (talk) 18:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: support merge – had an unremarkable trek across the ocean and had minimal impact. Pertinent information from this article could easily be folded into the season article. Drdpw (talk) 06:23, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Support See no reason not to merge. Seems to fail on notability grounds. Noah, AATalk 14:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:1972 Atlantic hurricane season

message: Ones in italics are subtrop.HurricaneCraze32 20:00, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Button bar up

message: The Sand box says there were 7 when their were 8 according to the infomation contained on the page and so i am going to edit it to say 8 any problems with this? Jason Rees 19:53, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I have a problem with that. There were 4 tropical storms and three subtropical storms, though one of those tropical storms was once a subtropical storm. That might be where the confusion is. Hurricanehink (talk) 19:58, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Yea, there are 7 according to the page. It says it in Hurricane Betty's section that it was named Bravo, though Betty's naming as a tropical system superceded the name Bravo. Hurricanehink (talk) 20:18, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of storms

message: *Jun 18-21      Western Atlantic  Called T.D. #4 when it formed east of Agnes
*Jun 22-29      Central Atlantic
*Jul 9-13        Western Atlantic  Winds 35 mph gusting to 45 mph at Frying Pan Shoals
*Jul 15-23      North Atlantic
*Jul 20-24      North Atlantic
*Jul 30-Aug 4  Western Atlantic  1012 mb low
*Aug 5-8         Ern Trop Atlantic
*Aug 11-16      Western Atlantic
*Aug 16-18      Ern Trop Atlantic
*Sep 1-3         Western Atlantic
*Sep 2-6         Central Atlantic
*Sep 15-18      East of Bermuda  1010 mb low
*Sep 19-25      Cntrl Trop Atl
*Sep 28-Oct 1  Central Atlantic
*Sep 30-Oct 3  Central Atlantic
*Oct 4-16        Atlantic
*Oct 15-25      Ern Trop Atlantic
*Oct 21-24      West Cntrl Atlantic
Thegreatdr 16:21, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 18 Nondeveloping tropical depressions of 1972