lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Microprocessors

message: It may or may not be worthwhile to try to distinguish "individual" processors  from "families". Messy because "individual" types often have a range of submodels with different power use, speed, peripherals, etc. Stan 16:42, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I have used the following self-devised guidelines when defining the subcats x86 microprocessors, 68k microprocessors, and 65xx microprocessors: the main architecture article, as well as the initial processor and particularly important members of a family have also been included in the present category, due to their general significance. The other family members are included in the family subcat only. Also, so far "my" subcats have been restricted to families of 10+ members. How about this? --Wernher 05:29, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: µP family subcats

message: gedday all, there is no article on benchmarking processor speeds (that I could find). I discovered this when I was buying a second hand computer... how fast is that 1gig PIII vers that 666mhz celeron... etc intel publish the benchmarks here.. is it worth cutting and pasting this into an article? Erich 06:26, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: benchmarking

message: Where should the Hewlett-Packard range of processor chips be included? For example Capricorn, which was used in the HP_series_80. Other processors include Nut, Halfnut and Saturn as listed http://www.brouhaha.com/~eric/hpcalc/chips/ 81.154.222.142 23:39, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: HP processors

message: Can I create :Category:Microprocessors by country? `a5b (talk) 01:19, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microprocessors by country
Talk:Halal

message: Two quotes directly from the article:
 Halal meat is "stun-free", so it violates RSPCA standards on animal welfare and is against the law in the EU,
... and...
 The animal may be stunned prior to having its throat cut. [...] Supermarkets selling halal products also report that all animals are stunned before they are slaughtered. Tesco, for example, says "the only difference between the halal meat it sells and other meat is that it was blessed as it was killed." 
As someone who is neither in knowledge of the Islam faith nor the UK laws, I find this extremely confusing, and uncertain as to whether one or the other has been misquoted or explained poorly. Is it possible to add a line somewhere to clarify the (appearing) discrepancy, or otherwise correct the misinformation (if that is what it is)? 
Kurasu (talk) 10:50, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion on internal inconsistency 

message: I propose edits that explain the Yorkshire video from December 2014 and how Halal was violated. --Sdenkmann (talk) 23:26, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: As I wrote in my edit summary, there was a problem with how your addition was phrased; see WP:EDITORIALIZING for more detail. Also, the cited source doesn't seem to establish this episode as sufficiently relevant to the subject of the article and prominent in that context. A couple of Muslims who claimed to run a halal butchery were caught violating halal rules. Why should this be covered in an encyclopedic article about halal? Eperoton (talk) 02:26, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yorkshire Video 

message: This section needs help. As I read it today, it seems to mix Islamic and Jewish slaughtering practices in the same paragraph, leaving me unsure who does what. Also, the Ethiopian Orthodox slit an animal's jugular saying "In the name of the Father (and Son and Holy Ghost)." Is something similar found in other Orthodox communities? Or is this something that developed in the Ethiopian Orthodox Church to distinguish themselves from Muslims? Pete unseth (talk) 14:21, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meat slaughtered or prepared by People of the Book 

message: The term "halal" is concept in Islamic law meaning permissible. It is also popularly used to describe food deemed permissible by Islam. These are two different concepts and I think this article needs to be split.VR talk 02:21, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually Islamic dietary laws already exists, so most of the content from this article should be moved there.VR talk 02:23, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs to be split 

message: For info. -Roxy  the dog. wooF 17:02, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Page is temporarily semi-protected to stop the (potentially good faith) addition of unsourced and poorly formatted text. Apologies if this protection obstructs any IP editor wanting to make unrelated changes to the article. Feel free to propose those unrelated edits here via the edit-request template so they can be considered for inclusion on the page. -- Euryalus (talk) 22:41, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page protection requested
Talk:Shatt al-Arab

message: I just did a web search for "presitful".  Every hit seems to be copied from this article, except a reference to "vice presitful".  Clearly some word was mangled, but I find nothing like it in the referenced article (Danube River).  Can someone guess what word(s) were meant?    Randall Bart    Talk   20:33, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the term meant is thalweg or deep river line. It does appear that somebody has mangled the phrase. --A.S. Brown (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed this from presitful principle to thalweg principle. While I don't know what the misspelled "presitful" was meant to be, the description in the rest of the original sentence match that of the thalweg principle. I also removed the reference to the Danube river, since that article did not mention this principle or anything related to borderlines in rivers. Conscientiouspirate (talk) 05:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  presitful 

message: arvand rud is the real name of this river.this is an old name. shat al-arab is a false name and all know this. please change the subject of this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.132.209.113 (talk) 16:12, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  greater Iran 

message: Shat all Arabs  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:410A:D400:F1C7:FBA2:7C6F:1F05 (talk) 19:46, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jokes aren't acceptable 

message: When and how did this form?  Sarsath3 (talk) 00:27, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formation?
Talk:Streatham railway station

message: Photo request tag added. JoshHolloway 17:37, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As a photo is now present, I have removed the tag. -=# Amos E Wolfe talk #=- 12:26, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested Photo 

message: Article says, with no source,"In the 1920s there was a plan to extend the Northern Line from Kennington to Streatham via Brixton and Herne Hill replacing the British Rail tracks to Streatham. The plans were in place for the extension, however it never materialised like much of the New Works Programme for the Northern Line". The 1920s were a time of change for railways, in particular the grouping, nevertheless there were no British Rail tracks to Streatham at that time. WP is an encyclopedia not a collection of "You know what I mean" fragments.  Just what does it mean for "plans to be in place"? 
The New Works Programme was from the mid 1930s and its non-completion was due to a war and a change in planning policy.--SilasW (talk) 10:41, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Plans"
Talk:Laurence Rockefeller

message: Please delete this.  I thought there wasn't a page for Laurance Rockefeller.  There is, but I misspelled his first name, and made this page as a result.
--BKHal2007 18:23, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It's likely to be a common error so I have created it as a redirect. -- Graham  ☺ | Talk 23:26, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Low-protein diet

message: Section name changed by Billby (talk) 02:57, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Although it's not useful in CKD, I think we should keep this, because the idea is used (or misused) in other contexts.  For example, more than a dozen years ago, my mother, who had moderate stage breast cancer, went on a very low protein diet as an "alternative" treatment for cachexia.  (She died less than six months later, which will not surprise anyone who knows anything about the physiology of cancer wasting.) WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:29, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not for Deletion
Talk:Differential Galois theory

message: I was somehow surprised to be redirected here from differential algebra.
For me, differential algebra means an algebra with a derivation,
e.g. lie algebras and so on.
Thus this initial link should point to a page where derivations, not antiderivations, come first
(or to the category of this name).  — MFH: Talk 22:02, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I redirected differential algebra to this article because I started writing an article on the subject and then discovered the Differential Galois theory article with the content I needed.   The subject has its origins in Liouville's papers centered on a theorem (now known as Liouville's principle) that gives the form of an elementary integral.  Differential algebra is being used in the sense of Joseph Ritt, whose book is available online from the AMS.   Ritt's approach still has many analytical elements in it, but in 1968 Rosenlicht published an algebraic proof of Liouville's principle.  Ritt seems to be well cited.  The field of differential algebra has many applications for symbolic manipulations in programs such as Mathematica and Maple. As I noted, I'm a dilettante, so beware.     XaosBits 02:35, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differential algebra 

message: 'However, no matter how long the list of so called elementary functions, there will still be functions on the list whose antiderivatives are not."--VKokielov 05:02, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is this defended? 

message: Hello! I am looking for an example of how to use the basic theorem. Is there an easy application to, for instance, prove that e^{e^x} or e^{x^2} doesn't have an elementary integral? Thanks A5 16:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example? 

message: This is not true. If we consider only polynomials to be elementary, any integral of elementary function will be elementary.--MathFacts (talk) 20:43, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  However, no matter how long the list of so called elementary functions, as long as it is finite, there will still be functions on the list whose antiderivatives are not.
Talk:Clifford module

message: This has become a useful page for explicit information. It would be good also to have a statement of the basic Atiyah-Bott-Shapiro result on Clifford modules.
Charles Matthews 19:30, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial comments

message: "A generalized FFT for Clifford algebras" ( 2005, preprint  2004)
and references. 
The paper gives detailed constructions for both naive and fast versions of both the forward and inverse real matrix representations for all signatures of real universal Clifford algebras.
Also see my discussion item Talk:Spinor#Mathematics_vs_Physics.
Leopardi 07:16, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also 

message: Elements of Clifford modules are usually called spinors, or more precisely, pinors.  This page needs a link to something about spinors.  Maybe it should even be merged in.  John Baez (talk) 03:12, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Where are the Spinors?

message: The section on the real Clifford algebra R3,1 says: "The four basis vectors are the three Pauli matrices and a fourth antihermitian matrix. The signature is (+++−). For the signatures (+−−−) and (−−−+) often used in physics, 4×4 complex matrices or 8×8 real matrices are needed." This does not seem to make sense - 4x4 complex matrix = 32 real coefficients, 8x8 real matrix = 64 real coefficients. Also the article "Classification of Clifford algebras" lists (+---) as a 2x2 quaternion matrix, and (-+++) as a real 4x4 matrix, though perhaps the context is different. This section is very sketchy, it seems to convey no substantive information. Someone who knows more about this should revise and expand this section.Enon (talk) 21:26, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: What is written is correct.  While a general 8x8 matrix has 64 independent components, not all of this freedom is used when representing an arbitrary member of R(3,1) -- instead a member of R(3,1) is represented by a linear combination of sixteen particular 8x8 matrices which represent the full linear basis of the algebra.  It is found to be necessary to represent each of these basis elements as an 8x8 matrix, in order for their matrix representations to have the correct products to match the multiplication group of the basis elements, and the correct signatures. Jheald (talk) 09:14, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Jheald. That would be good information to add, though I think a bit more context and working through the reasoning and implications is needed for this section to convey much to anyone who isn't already familiar with the topic. This way of using the Pauli matrices seems quite a different approach than that used in Geometric Algebra. (For other readers, Jheald is a frequent contributor to the geometric algebra article. GA  has methods for avoiding using the Pauli matrices directly, although it is also a style of using Clifford algebras.) I also hope somebody will address John Baez's long-standing request for more in the article on the connections to (IIRC) spinors, spin and pin groups.Enon (talk) 17:25, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real Clifford algebra R(3,1)
Talk:Sound pressure level

message: i think some microphones are better thought of as displacement measurers instead of pressure measurers.  is this true? - Omegatron 20:08, Jul 16, 2004 (UTC)
:I can't see what the objective difference between these alternatives would be, given that the displacement e.g. of some membrane is directly caused by the pressure of a sound wave. Therefore, it seems to me that the question is meaningless. RPaschotta 10:49, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microphone: measures pressure or displacement? 

message: When sound pressures are specified, one should be more clear about their definition: is it the peak pressure (i.e., the amplitude of a sinusoidal signal), or rather some rms (root-mean-square) value? This applies e.g. to the reference sound pressure specified in the article. Can anybody help? RPaschotta 10:49, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sound pressure amplitudes 

message: :Merging \ is \ really \ no \ good \ idea! \  \  \ SPL \ is \ not \ sound \ pressure.
::Look at the two articles. They're very closely related. I don't think they deserve two separate articles. - Omegatron June 30, 2005 13:53 (UTC)
We have SPL as a level [dB] an the sound pressure [Pa]. That is not closely related.
If I look for level, I need no sound pressure. If I look for sound pressure, I need no level.
The same is with sound level, with sound intensity level, with sound power level, and particle velocity level. Merging is not desirable. Look at the other languages. IT's always separated.
Mike 20:08, June 30, 2005 (UTC)
:Ok.  There would still be redirects so if you look for SPL you will find sound pressure.  Look at sound pressure.  It already has a description of SPL in it!  I don't think it is absolutely imperative to merge, though.  Whatever. - Omegatron July 2, 2005 04:17 (UTC)
It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with particle velocity. (Discuss)
That's no good idea. Keep it as it is. Ericd 13:22, Sep 02, 2005 (UTC)
: Pressure and particle velocity are related (p = rho c u, Robert Urick's "Principles of Underwater Sound" (3rd edition), pp.11-12), but they are definitely not the same thing. Two articles are indicated, but each should note the relation. Wesley R. Elsberry 10:42, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say SPL is a specific way to represent sound pressure, so they should be in the same article.  But sound pressure should have its own article, just like air pressure is distinct from air, blood pressure is distinct from blood, vapor pressure is distinct from vapor, etc.  Otherwise we'd have to put all of the sound measurements and concepts into the sound article, and it would get crowded quickly. — Omegatron 12:46, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merging
Talk:Smelly Cat

message: Why is the page of song lyrics ok, but the other page of phoebe's song lyrics was deleted?
* Yeah, why did the massive list of ALL of Phoebe's songs get deleted? Ian42 12:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  How come the other songs got deleted? 

message: The first paragraph says 'The song is obviously inspired by Charles Manson's Garbage Dump'. Although I agree there are some similarities, Google didn't come up with a single clue backing this statement. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 131.211.51.190 (talk) 11:54, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garbage Dump?
Talk:Bowmore distillery

message: I've been wondering, can anyone tell me how this brand is pronounced? Does it rhyme with "go-more", or "how-more"? -R. fiend 20:31, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Rhymes with "Go-More", with emphasis on the second syllable, according to   - CFang 17:19, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Scanian dialect/Archive 1

message: Claiming that the Scaninan language is a separate language in itself is POV. Most linguists will hardly classify it as being more than Swedish dialect. Changing Mälardalen-r's to Uvular R's and adding dipthong's were other Swedes would not use them is not sufficient for it to be labelled a separate language. If the article is to maintain that there exists a separate language called Scanian which is different from the dialect of Swedish spoken in Scania this should at the very least be made more clear.—Gabbe 20:43, Jul 16, 2004 (UTC)
:*sigh* Every single language post in which this is debateable seems to have someone claim X is a dialect of Y.  There is no such thing. Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish, could all easily be said to be dialects of Danish, and, I believe, have been, at some point or another.  This does not make it right.      Also, calling it a distinct language is also POV.
:We could add "Whether Scanian is language or a dialect is disputed." 
::The observation that the Scandinavian languages could be classified as one language is correct. Since Scanian is obviously less distinguishable, this is an argument for classifying Scanian as a dialect. --Etxrge 06:56, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for both your contributions. Be Bold in updating but make sure to Wikipedia:Cite Sources. --Fred-Chess 10:06, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled section

message: I have removed this from "Specific features" as I don't think there are references for it: ''
[...], much to the amusement of proper Swedish speakers, but to the pride of the native Scanians. Often, the level of Scanian is decided by how heavy the diftong is. The more vowels used, the better; and how the diphtongs are used are what seperates different Scanian areas apart. The word har is for instance in Scanian pronounced "haur", and Scanians in general make frequent use of the vowels "u" and "e" which they in the pronounciation of almost every word. 
Another unmistaken feature is the pronounciation of the word yes; it is spelled ja, and pronounced ja: all over Sweden (which has been featured in Bergman movies, and is often used to parody Swedes in American movies), while in Scanian, the word is pronounced short as já. 
Additionally, the prosody of Scanian differs from (other) Swedish dialects; and overall Scanian is most closely related to the east Danish dialects spoken on the island of Bornholm, which is why some linguists prefer to classify Scanian as a variety of Danish  --Fred-Chess 13:05, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move and new edits
Talk:Citroën AX

message: "In 1989 ... mpg ... gallons"  Are these US gallons or imperial gallons (the values are significantly different,see fuel efficiency) Notinasnaid 14:38, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  what does mpg mean? 
Talk:List of Croatian grammar books

message: I've replaced in translation in English the words Illyrian and Slovinian with Croatian.
In those dictionaries, the case was that, that Croatian was used as synonym for Illyrian.
Then, I've made a translation according to the modern language name.
Why I did it? E.g., in Mikalja's Croatian-Italian-Latin dictionary, he calls Croatian "Illyricus" in Latin. As synonym in Croatian, he titles his language as "Slovinski" (slovinian). His Latin translation of "Slovinian" is "Illyricus", but in the same dictionary, he says "Illyricus"=Croata, Hervat".
On the other hand, in that same dictionary, he calls Italian language as "Latin", but in his text in Croatian says "Latinski aliti Talijanski" (Latin or Italian).
In that same dictionary, he calls Latin language as "dijacki" (students') language.
That's why we don't call his dictionary as "Slovinian-Latin-Students'", but "Croatian-Italian-Latin". Kubura 08:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illyrian 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed proposal, closing per WP:RMNOMIN. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:31, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Croatian-language grammar books →  – Consistency with List of Croatian dictionaries and other articles with this naming formulation. –Vipz (talk) 10:52, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 September 2023
Talk:704 Hauser

message: The show's premise reminds me of the situation we've just had with my grandma's house.  She died last year, and we had to sell her house.  First time in over 100 years that the house has been outside the family, and even now I can't see anyone but Grandma living there.  It was so much a part of my childhood, and now it's gone.  I think that's the same thing here with this show.  It was painful to not see Archie and his family in that house anymore, and that's why the show upended before too long.
JesseG 22:05, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The 6 eppisodes are avaliable for free streaming in Canada on CTV.CA as part of their "Throwback" sitcoms, should that be mentioned on the wiki?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.206.20.134 (talk) 18:30, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: HOME MEDIA