lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:A56 road

message: This article is a bit too wordy for me, which is why I've added the  template.  See A1 and A66 for good examples of how a roads article should be laid out, and not simply a narrative of all its waypoints, which is not useful for an encyclopedia.  See wp:mos. — superbfc [ talk | cont ] — 21:39, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Style

message: As of the date of writing, the Infobox for the Junciton list is incomplete and inaccurate. Needs to be re-written,--TimMassey (talk) 23:07, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Completed re-write of the Info Box and added a couple of destinations.--TimMassey (talk) 17:22, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have reduced the amount of major junctions on this article from 28 to 9 by making it only major A roads and motorways. Roads4117 (talk) 07:08, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major junctions
Talk:Liberators' civil war

message: "the Republican fleet, patrolling the Ionian Sea, was able to intercept and destroy the triumvirs' "
this dosn't make sence to me. the repulicans attcked the triumvate?Wikidrift (talk) 20:22, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The Liberatores=Cassius & Brutus=Republicans, were against the Triumvirate. It could be worded differently. T8612 (talk) 21:45, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naval battle and other developments 

message: This article is basically a copy of Battle of Philippi: it's a "civil war" that comprises a single battle. The name "Liberators' civil war" also seems made-up, no reliable source uses it. This article should probably be deleted so that readers and editors won't waste time and effort with two redundant pages. Avilich (talk) 02:20, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useless article?
Talk:Jackson Highway

message: I see that there is a proposal to merge Jackson's Military Road into this article. I don't see a discussion of the proposal, but this is the page where it is supposed to be discussed.
*I oppose the merger. The historical road, which I just referred to in the history section of Lawrence County, Tennessee, is an entirely "different animal" from the modern Jackson Highway. See the Lawrence County article to see why it would be adversely affected by a merger. --orlady 21:41, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merger
Talk:The Astronaut (1972 film)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) The Night Watch (talk) 13:59, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 January 2023
Talk:A61 road

message: This article is a bit too wordy for me, which is why I've added the  template.  See A1 and A66 for good examples of how a roads article should be laid out, and not simply a narrative of all its waypoints, which is not useful for an encyclopedia.  See wp:mos. — superbfc [ talk | cont ] — 21:42, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Style

message: Why does the main description describe the road from north-south, whilst the lead and infobox describe it as running from south-north?  L.J.Skinnerwot|I did 22:18, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Description

message: Added to WP:WikiProject Sheffield as one of the cities main arterial routes, and is linked to several articles, and has a clean up tag so some one with local knowledge may be able to improve article, at least in the Sheffield section.
--BulldozerD11 (talk) 19:47, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sheffield Project
Talk:Salem Hospital (Massachusetts)

message: Text introduced from here by an edittor indicating they are the web master for the site.  However, the site is copyrighted and there is no inidcation that this is a proper release under the GFDL. Until that is cleared up, the copyrighted text should not be bropugh back. -- Whpq 21:43, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: Captain John Bertram (1796-1882) lived in Salem, Massachusetts and is the founder of Salem Hospital.  In addition to Salem Hospital, John Bertram died in March of 1882, his widow donated their home,John Bertram Mansion, a High Style Italianate brick and brownstone mansion that was built at 370 Essex Street  and this became the Salem Public Library.  In addition,  John Bertram House is now a home for the eldery.
In 1873, Captain John Bertram gave a gift of $25,000 in cash, plus a brick mansion on Charter Street to create Salem Hospital. From the original building on Charter Street Salem Hospital moved to the current location on Highland Avenue in 1917. 
would be great if Salem Hospital had archive info, on the documents on Captain John Bertram related to the rich donation of his that founded Salem Hospital.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.155.43.104 (talk) 19:49, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Captain John Bertram

message: This page goes back and forth on names. Is it North Shore Medical Center or Salem Hospital.
If one was the former name, it needs to be addressed.
Travis H. O. (talk) 19:39, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  North Shore Medical Center or Salem Hospital?
Talk:Foster Report

message: This page has zero citations except for one person's personal webpage. How do we know if this is reliable? 195.137.85.173 21:43, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: I've queried the statement that the attention given to the Church of Scientology in the early sixties was a result of the controversies over its teachings, policies and activities.  This is someone's inference and needs to be justified by a reference; were there any other reasons for the attention?  And the Foster, Anderson, Lee and Dumbleton-Powles inquiries were clearly not simultaneous - as evidenced by the dates of their respective reports. DavidCooke 02:09, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Research?
Talk:Legio IV Flavia Felix

message: "Since the symbol of the legion is a lion, it was probably levied in July/August 70." - logic behind this statement? Maury Markowitz (talk) 00:54, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curious...
Talk:Fred C. Blanck

message: Likely him, Library of Congress Card Catalogue
:LC Control Number: 	 55007734
:Type of Material: 	Book (Print, Microform, Electronic, etc.)
:Personal Name: 	Blanck, Frederick Conrad, 1881- ed.
:Main Title: 	Handbook of food and agriculture.
:Published/Created: 	New York, Reinhold Pub. Corp., 1955.
:Description: 	vii, 1039 p. illus. 24 cm.
and from the 1881 dob there, likely this one in Social Security Death Index
:FRED BLANCK  14 Oct 1881  Jan 1965 (Maryland) (none specified)	577-20-3843 District of Columbia
at least that shoudl be a good starting point, since he worked at the U.S. Department of Agriculture.  Gene Nygaard 05:49, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:A71 road

message: This article is a bit too wordy for me, which is why I've added the  template.  See A1 and A66 for good examples of how a roads article should be laid out, and not simply a narrative of all its waypoints, which is not useful for an encyclopedia.  See wp:mos. — superbfc [ talk | cont ] — 21:47, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Style
Talk:Ernest J. Briskey

message: hi--66.204.40.126 (talk) 20:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stephen S. Chang

message: Per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 March 21#Category:Missing middle or first names, :Category:Missing middle or first names has been added to this talk page.—DomBot / ChiDom talk 09:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add maintenance category 
Talk:List of Press Gang episodes

message: Is the cast list really necessary for each season? They are practically identical -- there are only a handful of changes (Kenny, Sam, Julie), which are well described in the summaries. I don't think any of the other list articles have these. It's beginning to look more and more like Newton's page! (Thanks for your work, though). The JPStalk to me 22:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is crying out for individual episode pages that can contain information like cast, it just won't fit here. - Peregrine Fisher 09:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, they will be good. My wish is that they are created steadily and properly, rather than quickly and superficial. I've been looking at the Scrubs, and others, episode articles, and many are weak: having being created simply to turn a red link blue. Also, we shouldn't be too dependent on Newton's (very good) site. If I were Matthew, I'd be a little miffed that we copy his lits of trivia (a no-no section anyway) and first/last appearances. I suggest that we go for the most notable episodes first (what is considered notable is down to individual urge to work on them). The JPStalk to me 10:23, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast lists 

message: I'd like to propose we move the DVD information to below the episode listing. For one, a part from the LOE pages, it's generally standard practice among TV and Film articles to put DVD info last. This is a List of Episodes page, and not a List of DVDs page, so the first thing a reader should see should be the episodes. It's also a bit misleading to have it under "Series overview" (or something similar), because it isn't an overview or a summary. It's just a table for the DVD releases. I recently adjusted List of Smallville episodes to reflect that, moving the DVD info below the episodes under the new header of "Home video release", which is more appropriate given what it actually is. This isn't a major change, but I'd rather come to the talk pages of all the relevant LOE pages first.   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 12:14, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section move 
Talk:A77 road

message: This article is a bit too wordy for me, which is why I've added the  template.  See A1 and A66 for good examples of how a roads article should be laid out, and not simply a narrative of all its waypoints, which is not useful for an encyclopedia.  See wp:mos. — superbfc [ talk | cont ] — 21:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Style
Talk:Wild Hope

message: I wrote a new article on Talk:Wild Hope/Temp. SKS2K6 22:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New article

message: Does anyone know where the listed B-sides and uncomfirmed tracks are available? Or which albums/singles they can be purchased on, etc...?  This information is relevant to be added, if it is available. Bradg84 22:01, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-Sides
Talk:Birger Dahlerus

message: ++Lar: t/c 22:14, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article was selected for [[WP:DYK|DYK]]! 

message: He also tried after that died, but sadly was refused. --41.246.14.175 (talk) 22:47, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  After British Declaration of War on Germany 

message: "Dahlerus, whether he was duped as well, mesmerized by taking what seemed to him a crucial role in world diplomacy or was all along an accomplice to the Nazi attempt at deception, played his role well and managed to confuse the British government for a long time." Sorry, but what "deception" are you talking about. It sounds like a conspiracy theory, but what is the evidence for this? 102.66.5.132 (talk) 12:09, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dahlerus Conspiracy 

message: This is a very poor and opinionated article and many historians would argue that Bethell was not the most brilliant historian. Citing more-or-less him and almost no-one else is unsatisfactory. it is also incorrect to say that all the diplomatic activities of Dahlerus between him and the British and Polish were classified is simply untrue. They all appear in Documents on British Foreign Policy 1919-1939 Third Series, vol. vii, Her Majesty's Stationary Office, London, 1954. 2A00:23C4:B617:7D01:B9F8:6000:DCA2:89E3 (talk) 14:23, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Poor article
Talk:Seneca High School MCA

message: What's "MCA"?  Either way, the Seneca High School in Louisville on the disambiguation page should be directed here.--G.B. Blackrock 22:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Thin White Line

message: I think the scene where Brian and Joe tackle the guy with the drugs in his briefcase and Joe points a gun at him and yells "Don't move dirtbag" is a reference to the Police Academy character Laverne Hooks. Anyone thinks the same?
# Ido50 (talk to me), at 12:27, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Police Academy reference?

message: Does anyone know exactly what he said when asked about his day on cocaine?  Or if I can find a video clip of it on YouTube?  AndarielHalo (talk) 01:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brian's day? 

message: whats that white crud on brians nose in the picture it looks like this picture was editied  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackjohnson15 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture 

message: that thin red streak topped with a line of steel, popularly contracted to "the thin red line", should probably be mentioned as at least an inspiration of the title (not every English speaker automatically knows the culture).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.245.218.57 (talk) 21:44, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  that thin red streak topped with a line of steel 

message: Everyone seems to remember where Family Guy is ripping of South Park. Is this where Family Guy has made fun of something South Park does not dare to poke?(82.134.28.194 (talk) 12:42, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  These pregnant teenagers
Talk:History of the Green Bay Packers

message: There doesn't appear to be any info on this page that is not also present in the article for Green Bay Packers or other articles, thus not worthy of its own entry. I suggest this article be absorbed into the main entry, or the duplicious info be removed from the other entry, so this article would actually be useful. ---Jackel 22:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article was made so the history section could be reduced and the history could be expanded. It was recommended on Wikiproject NFL. Don't know if there are any editors willing to clean this up. It's on my to do list now, but don't know when I'll be able to get to it.++aviper2k7++ 22:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since posting my original comments, I've noted that other teams have a special "history" page, so I guess my suggestion is that this page be maintained, and the Packers page be purged of info that is present here. Its pretty long. ---Jackel 04:50, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll do that this week, it's atop my to-do list.++aviper2k7++ 05:21, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I took the tag off this is standard practice, also see my comments on the ratings comment page. Quadzilla99 01:55, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split
Talk:2nd Cavalry Division (United States)

message: There seems to be a history of calling this formation 2d Cavalry rather than 2nd Cavalry. Probably not sufficient for a rename in terms of WP:NC but even there I'm not completely sure. But either way, it's a very interesting phenomenon that should be explained in the article IMO.
Sites that use the 2d name include:
* http://www.history.army.mil/topics/afam/2CD.htm
* http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/army/2acr.htm (but not consistently as far as I can see)
There have also been several uses of this title in en.wikipedia:
* U.S. 2d Cavalry Division
* 1st Cavalry Division (United States)#1920s and 1930s
I haven't "corrected" the 1st Cavalry Division (United States) page as I think there's obviously a lot more going on than just a typo here. More information, anyone? Andrewa (talk) 17:06, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 2nd or 2d

message: The entire "WW2" section appears to be a literatim lift from here.  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  09:47, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio
Talk:Stop Her Now

message: I don't feel this article is very objective. Can someone please put an opposing viewpoint into this?
TrrpnFlyr 22:19, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Wave soldering

message: ==Request for comment==
Chapmanc is repeatedly adding links to his company as "Examples of wave soldering pallets" (and appears to be deleting links to his competitors). This is a Conflict of interest and will need to be resolved. It is a valid "Example" however and to keep everyone happy - i propose the layout like this:
Manufacturers of wave solder pallets (example): [link1] [link2] etc - with MULTIPLE companies, not just the one.
Same applys with wave soldering machines - will need to add links to other manufacturers other than Essemtec
There is more discussion at my talk page.
Thanks
--Andy.gock 22:20, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links

message: Chapmanc is repeatedly adding links to his company as "Examples of wave soldering pallets" (and appears to be deleting links to his competitors). This is a Conflict of interest and will need to be resolved. It is a valid "Example" however and to keep everyone happy - i propose the layout like this:
Manufacturers of wave solder pallets (example): [link1] [link2] etc - with MULTIPLE companies, not just the one.
Same applys with wave soldering machines - will need to add links to other manufacturers other than Essemtec
There is more discussion at my talk page.
Thanks
--Andy.gock 22:20, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment

message: I updated this link to provide a visual example of a wave solder pallet, rather than just a link to a manufacturer.  I do not work FOR Pentagon, but I do work in contract manufacturing and order my pallets FROM them.  If this constitutes a conflict of interest I apologize.  I thought the pictures on their website provided better examples and made for a more useful link.  As there are several pallet providers and no set-in-stone standard, your compromise makes perfect sense.
Jirisundstrum 00:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wave Solder External links 

message: I added the bulk of the original section on Fixtures and added the original link to Datum Dynamics website. This was continually being deleted (which annoyed me!) and replaced with the Penatgon link. I assumed (wrongly, apparently) that this was Pentagon playing around. I agree with Andy Gock's suggestion. Please note that I have just added content concerning RoHS and wave pallet mateials, together with a link to an article (yes, that I wrote!) on the issues. It is intended to be informative, but does contain references, towards the end, of one of our products, but it is not meant to be a heavy sell. I trust that there is no objection to this?
Thanks
Chapmanc 13:05, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wave Solder External Links 

message: This article seems to have a lot of textual overlap with .  Should this Web site be cited? 165.170.128.65 (talk) 20:21, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Material used but not cited? 

message: Is "Products like the Solderstar WaveShuttle and the Optiminer" considered advertisement? I'll leave it for someone else to decide and remove if so. 80.254.154.67 (talk) 13:35, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement?
Talk:Earl Mount Cashell

message: There seems to have been another Viscount Mountcashel, namely Justin McCarthy.  See comment below from Talk:Jacobite peerage --Henrygb 22:20, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To my knowledge, McCarthy came from the Muskerry line of the MacCarthy clan, who had lands in modern counties in Kerry and Cork. See County Desmond. They had their property confiscated under the Cromwellian regime, but restored to them in the restoration. Justin McCarthy as made Viscount Mountcashel in 1688 or 1689, not long before his defeat at Newtownbutler. He was captured in the battle but later exchanged back to the Jacobites. He commanded the first Irish Brigade (French) and I think he died in exile in France. Hope that helps. Jdorney 11:22, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:Ghost Rider 2099

message: My understanding is that Ghost Rider 2099 - the character - doesn't warrant an article of his own, based on the project guidelines. See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/editorial_guidelines for the full blurb on this (it's the same philosophy that's being applied to Ultimate characters etc). However, Ghost Rider 2099 - the 25 issue ongoing series - does justify its own article. See Ultimate Spider-Man for an example of something similar. --Mrph 08:12, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Focus of the article - Series or character?

message: I've used the Mark Buckingham cover to #2, as I wanted an image from the original creative team. Out of the possible choices, this one wasn't just a headshot and was (from my point of view) the best one that also included the bike - #3 does also have the bike, but is an action shot with a slightly skewed view of the character's head. Are we generally happy with this, or are there suggested alternatives? --Mrph 20:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cover image

message: The character article is basically just a copy and paste of information from the original article. I thought about just going ahead and merging them without a discussion, but I thought having a discussion for future reference would help keep the article (and other articles with similar pointless divisions) from being created again. Spidey104 13:40, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Support merger.  All information related to the comic and characters should stay in this article unless the article becomes too large (~100kb, not an issue at present). NB: For future reference, I have no prejudice against future recreation of a separate biography if, and only if, the article either becomes too large or the information is used by several articles and a single biography would be more efficient than repeating the information (unlikely to be an issue for this comic unless Marvel revives the character or setting). - AdamBMorgan (talk) 16:00, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

text: Support merger per above. --Crazy runner (talk) 05:39, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 
Talk:Central school

message: Its a definition so may be useful Victuallers 16:51, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Has at least a sentence on central schools, something about apprenticeships, and going on to technical or commercial colleges. I don't know what a commercial college is. 
https://www.google.com/books/edition/_/rNGPAgAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0
Dictionary of British Education
By Professor Peter Gordon, Professor Denis Lawton · 2004
Lena Key (talk) 15:43, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New source
Talk:Verkehrsverbund Berlin-Brandenburg

message: Is this vague term "transport association" defined somewhere?  For example, virtually all transport in eastern Japan (Kanto) has integrated PASMO ticketing, and ja-Wikipedia gives Kanto's area as 32,423.90km² (slightly larger than VBB) with a population of 41,040,394 (far larger than VBB).  Once ICOCA, PiTaPa, and TOICA are integrated (2008-2009), it will cover virtually all of Japan's main population centers. Jpatokal (talk) 14:19, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest transport association
Template talk:Turkish musical instruments

message: Can we make this template 'hidden' by default? denizTC 00:48, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so, those who wish not to see will have to press hide.. Although, ask at WPTR talk page, Mustafa and Atilim know more about templates than I do.. Baristarim 01:50, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hidden
Talk:Conscience clause (education)

message: At the moment, the only page that links here is George Anthony Denison, an 19th century English reverend who co-wrote a book called The Conscience Clause. It seemed useful to add a bit about the meaning of the phrase in that context, which was quite different from its meaning in the United States today. FreplySpang (talk) 03:39, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  19th century England