lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Vehicle registration plates of Portugal

message: What motivated Portugal to introduce a yellow ribbon with first registration date ?
Besides allowing people to show off with new cars ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.69.223.133 (talk) 15:57, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yellow ribbon 

message: MM-##-## plates were also used by the army, for its logistics branch (Manutenção Militar); currently only MX-##-## plates are in use in the army. 95.94.48.142 (talk) 03:01, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  MM-##-## license plates 

message: Vehicles which cannot exceed 45 kph have registration plates with the standard Portuguese alphanumeric sequence, but with yellow background. Hizoomi (talk) 20:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Light quadricycles 

message: The following statement in the first paragraph of the article should be verified or clarified. As of 2024 the "new system" has run through the initial 'A' sequence and does not appear to include 'AK', 'AW' or 'AY':
"Moreover, the letters W and Y, never before used, and the letter K, used only for a short-lived series for imported vehicles in 1997 (see below), are being employed in the new system"
Hizoomi (talk) 21:02, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  K W Y 

message: i want this number for car plate 92.250.57.26 (talk) 16:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  JG 1322
Talk:1960 European Nations' Cup

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support as per norm  This Message was left by  CHAZA93  Talk  Contribs 
*Support -*Ulla* 02:46, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I work for UEFA, and I am updating broken links to our website (as our urls have all changed - this coud also be the case for match reports on the season pages UEFAlinks (talk) 09:19, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  UEFA.com links changed 

message: I have doubts that the logo on this page is genuine, it seems to be an adaptation of one that was used from 1984 to 1992. It certainly doesn't fit the graphical style of the 1960s at all. BillyH 20:13, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It may not have been the one that was used at the time, but it has been retconned into use by UEFA (see). – PeeJay 18:03, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo
Talk:1997 Tournoi de France

message: What is the source for referring to this as a “friendly” tournament? Bzweebl  (talk • contribs) 02:35, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now removed that adjective and explained my reasoning in the accompanying edit summary. Bzweebl  (talk • contribs) 04:09, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Friendly
Talk:Mildred Gillars

message: I removed Sean Penn from the See Also section. Please do not vandalize the article with political attacks on people such as him. --Revolución hablar ver 16:16, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He is scum and little different from Mildred Gillars so it should stay there along with other traitors such as Vanessa Redgrave.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.18.58.55 (talk) 00:36, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

text: Gillars didn't know it at the time, but American authorities had gotten wind of her broadcasts.
Of course they had "gotten wind of her broadcasts", she was publicly broadcasting! What is this sentence supposed to mean? 70.20.153.165 (talk) 13:29, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Any info on how she could possibly do her last broadcast from Berlin on the 6th of May, when Berlin had surrendered to the Russians on the night of 2nd/3rd May, with the "Haus des Rundfunks" (the Central Broadcasting Building) being officially captured on the 2nd of May? Did the Russinas allow her to continue broadcasting? 213.61.58.164 (talk) 10:18, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Broadcast 

message: Perhaps you  mean 'disseminate'. 121.44.175.17 (talk) 08:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Two minds with a single thought! I corrected this before I read your suggestion. Valetude (talk) 23:47, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proliferate ?
Category talk:Plant characters

message: In the first Well World novel, one of Nathan Brazil's passengers is reborn as a Czill, though I don't recall the character's name.  Asat 04:55, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have found that a few characters are missing, the most substantial of which being Wormwood from Don't Starve. Although, this mistake is not much to cry over. SkullflameEdits (talk) 22:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why not Wormwood?
Talk:William Bent

message: I've ranked this article as high for the Indigenous peoples of North America project for two reasons. First, William Bent's establishment of Bent's Fort significantly affected the lives of Plains Indians, especially the Cheyenne and Arapaho. Second, William Bent was not indigenous ethnically, but gained Cheyenne tribal membership and became a "Cheyenne sub-chief". Cedewey (talk) 00:02, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance Ranking

message: Have done extensive editing to improve organization, delete repetition, and improve sentence structure. I think there is too much detail on Cheyenne and Plains Indians affairs; while it is interesting, it is their story, and readers lose the sense of what role Bent played in all this.  The article has to focus on him.Parkwells (talk) 14:06, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy editing
Talk:Accelerated depreciation

message: As of right now I believe this article is focused too much on the tax applications of accelerated depreciation with little to no mention of the financial reporting aspects of it.  If no objections are presented, I plan to begin moving it in that direction.
Lordthees 13:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Have at it. :) - Taxman Talk 13:20, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no objection, although I'm not sure what you mean - I've always heard of it in relation to tax applications. The 'accelerated' is always in relation to something, and presumably the financial reporting standard/methodology should be the one that best reflects the 'true' depreciation. I'm aware of different methods, some of which are faster/slower than other methods (e.g. straight-line vs double-declining balance), but I don't usually hear them referred to as accelerated (since they're chosen to reflect/approximate true depreciation). But happy to hear other perspectives.--Gregalton 14:20, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, when accountants refer to accelerated depreciation methods, they refer (generally speaking) to the methods of depreciation that have higher depreciation amounts during the early years of a project's life (which for non-tax purposes basically means declining balance and sum-of-the-years-digits) Lordthees 16:37, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accounting perspective 
Talk:Kyle Maynard

message: Former title "award winning mixed martial artist" is misleading because 1. He has never even fought a pro MMA fight, 2. he awards came by having a flawless college wrestling career.  I believe revision takes this into account.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.233.211.126 (talk) 11:52, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Award winning mixed martial artist? 

message: Someone mentioned Kyle Maynard to me, and how the fact he could become a MMA fighter was inspiring... So I came to this article to find out why. I read through the whole article, and beyond mentioning he won an award for "best disabled athlete", it doesn't bother to mention his disability at all! I had to go look elsewhere to find out. This disability (to take nothing from this obviously talented man) is obviously a large part of the reason for his notability. I think this is a case of political correctness getting in the way of someone stating the obvious (and in this case, what's really important to be put forward). I'm prettttty sure Mr. Maynard will not be offended by the mention of his being an amputee, and I found this article absolutely laughable without it.
206.248.161.167 (talk) 14:34, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Congenital Amputee 
Talk:Allens (law firm)

message: I undeleted the article - this law firm is definitely notable: see for example Big 6 law firms -- enochlau (talk) 05:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Allens law firm

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Jafeluv (talk) 07:39, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Would 'Allens LLP' not be neater? Has the legal name of the firm also changed?Rangoon11 (talk) 00:00, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: LLP isn't included for any of the List of 100 largest law firms as far as I can see. Allens (law firm) and Allens (confectionary) are standardised. Just my opinion. Harro5 00:37, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ashurst is at LLP. However the addition of 'plc', 'limited' etc is fairly common for companies when the common name is taken, to avoid ... (company) eg Rolls-Royce plc.  Rangoon11 (talk) 00:58, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

text:  Allens is not an LLP. It is a general partnership formed under the laws of New South Wales. The name of the firm is simply Allens. Davidbradbury (talk) 01:36, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

text:  Allens (confectionery) concerns a Nestle sub-brand only sold in one market. The subject of this article is a major international law firm. I think there is a strong case to be made that this is the primary topic for Allens. However if the consensus is not, I would much prefer "Allens LLP" to "Allens (law firm)" (per Apple Inc., Acer Inc., Ashurst LLP etc), which is clumsy and unnecessary.Rangoon11 (talk) 23:26, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

text:  As noted above, Allens is not an LLP. It is a general partnership formed under the laws of New South Wales. The name of the firm is simply Allens. Davidbradbury (talk) 01:36, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

text: Thos stats do not take into account the use of "Allens" as the plural of "Allen", and linking to some "Allen" via a piped link. 70.49.124.225 (talk) 03:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
 Jack4576 (talk) 01:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Child tax credit

message: My understanding is the ages listed under the TCJA section are incorrect? https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/152 indicates a qualifying child is someone under 19 or under 24 if enrolled in college full time? Can someone confirm this for me?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by OpenSourceAdvocate56 (talk • contribs) 02:38, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

message: 12/22/2009 Changed some numbers for tax year 2009 and also included the alternative way to figure the credit for taxpayers with more than three qualifying children.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.214.106.153 (talk) 19:10, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: IRS checking of ACTC claims on ITIN returns is dramatically perfunctory. How to mention that here?? Have a link to Tax Credits for Illegal Immigrants I suppose. 67.161.10.103 (talk) 17:03, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ACTC claims not checked on ITIN returns 
Talk:Hearth tax

message: There is a major error in the lead paragraph here:
"A hearth tax was a property tax in certain countries during the medieval and early modern period, levied on each hearth, thus by proxy on each family unit."
This is not true and it  implies a poll or regressive tax, when hearth tax was essentially a real estate property tax and a progressive tax , as number of hearths in a dwelling was a proxy on a family's level of wealth.
This is widely understood by tax historians:
" It was the first progressive tax designed to raise money fairly; wealthier people would have had larger houses, which would have required more hearths to provide sufficient heat. "
https://www.roehampton.ac.uk/humanities/news/hearth-tax-documents-reveal-more-of-bristols-history-as-the-second-city-of-the-restoration-period/
Also:
https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1129&context=sjsumstjournalN34B2 (talk) 01:46, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This progressive tax is portrayed here as regressive
Talk:North Carolina's 13th congressional district

message: This is true of several N.C. congressional districts. The old 11th is now the 14th (sort of). I haven't seen what is where the 11th was. There's a big job to do and I don't know what should be done to each article.— Vchimpanzee •  talk • contributions •  18:17, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A totally different district
Talk:Cost segregation study

message: I had to go to the IRS website to find out what this article is talking about. Apparently cost allocation studies are becoming an ever more popular tax-reduction tool in the United States.  Fair enough.  But that doesn't mean this article should assume a LOT of reader knowledge, then go smack into a sales pitch. I think there's some good information here, but it's definitely not presented in a neutral way. And if you look at the history of the article, it's been a battle of firms that perform cost segregation studies, with one professional organization thrown in to help market this group.  I've rated it start-class for the Tax Project and put an Advertisement warning on the article. --SueHay 23:04, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement
Talk:J. M. Tate High School

message: The article had claimed the school's baseball team was the 1984 national champion.  I removed that because there is not such thing as a high school national championship for baseball today or in 1984.
Kendrafun (talk) 19:13, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Baseball championship

message: This article should use the secondary school infobox-- (like the one used on East Grand Rapids High School- You could copy and paste this and update the applicable information) Curran (talk) 14:54, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 20:12, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 
Talk:1980 World Champions' Gold Cup

message: Why did England decline to participate? Drutt (talk) 00:02, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: England

message: Is there any source for places 3 to 6 in the final ranking? If not it is OR and should be deleted!--Je suis blocked by Darkwind 11:01, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It was added by an IP here, so I delete it immediately.--Je suis blocked by Darkwind 11:20, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final rankig 

message: While it seems clear that the tournament was not held by FIFA, and thus a friendly in FIFA's eyes, I don't think the organizers themselves considered it a friendly. A similar situation happened in the Arab Champions Cup page, which is considered a friendly by FIFA, but not by the tournament organizers. I thought it was normal for both tournaments to be categorized as friendlies, but the people there told me that not only should it not say it's a friendly, it shouldn't mention FIFA's lack of involvement at all. I find this contradiction puzzling. BlackenedTheUSSR (talk) 17:05, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status as a friendly tournament
Talk:Disability pension

message: Does anyone else think that the name of this article should have the word "pension" removed?  In many countries, the word pension means for someone of retirement age.  Most of the information presented so far (and I would assume any future information) would be about people aged less than about 60/65.  
Mjm1964 13:08, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name change? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Disability pension. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.centrelink.gov.au/internet/internet.nsf/payments/qual_how_dsp.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.centrelink.gov.au/internet/internet.nsf/payments/pay_how_dsp.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130517120206/http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/94713ad445ff1425ca25682000192af2/8e72c4526a94aaedca2569de00296978!OpenDocument to http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/94713ad445ff1425ca25682000192af2/8e72c4526a94aaedca2569de00296978!OpenDocument
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.centrelink.gov.au/internet/internet.nsf/payments/pay_how_sck.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 --Mirokado (talk) 19:21, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:E-file

message: This article is terribly out of date.  EDI is not even used anylonger for EFILE.  http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/eservices/tax/individuals/efile-ind/menu-e.html Barry123 04:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page should be disambiguous as E-File can refer to either the Canadian system or the US system.Cool10191 (talk) 13:15, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambig 

message: I removed the reference to InfiniteECM, which is provided by a company called E-file LLC, according to http://www.infiniteecm.com/.
Given the following, the InfiniteECM sense of E-FILE appears insufficiently notable to list here:
# I can't find any substantial coverage of InfiniteECM in a reputable source
# I can't find a reputable, independent source linking the name "E-FILE" with InfiniteECM
Tmtsoftware was the last user to re-add this link. That user appears to have created articles E-FILE and InfiniteECM, which were speedily deleted (one for apparent non-notability, the other for blatant promotion). --Pnm (talk) 19:51, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of InfinteECM
Talk:Entertainment tax

message: November 13, 1952: "Columbus [Ohio] (UP) — The owners of a neighborhood movie theater were 'definitely pleased' today with their inauguration of an admission free policy to protest the 20 percent federal amusement tax imposed during World War II." https://www.newspapers.com/image/321721945/?terms=columbus%2B%22little%2Btheater%22Thus the United States did impose a federal amusement tax, from sometime in the early 1940s, until at least 1952. Milkunderwood (talk) 01:09, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  United States federal amusement tax
Talk:Estate planning

message: This article mentions NOTHING about WHY people do this.. and it glosses over the big picture for those who are not financially savvy.. this process allows the wealthiest among us to retire off mediCAID benefits.. Mostly because mediCARE will not cover the increasingly attractive "LONG TERM CARE" insurance coverage, while mediCAID will.. but only if you *appear* poor enough to qualify.
Lawyers and Accountants will set up all-day "Estate Planning" sessions at country clubs to help the wealthiest among us appear poor on paper. Middle Classers such as myself are getting shat on, since we are too wealthy to qualify for medicaid, yet not wealthy enough, not financially savvy enough, and we lack the "connections" in these industries to help us pose as poor people.
--24.228.3.70 (talk) 16:55, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia fails again! 

message: I have no objection at all to making this article international in scope, but the U.S. section is cursory and the Malaysian section is focused principally on will drafting and intestate succession as opposed to being more generally about estate planning. The Malaysia section also appears to contain original research.
Should this article include estate planning information by nation and, if so, how general or comprehensive should that content be? Arllaw (talk) 05:20, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  International Issues / Info by Nation 

message: How to fix I don't know can you tell me 120.89.104.82 (talk) 15:27, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to upload with mobile k2n56pa#ab5 updates
Talk:Challicum Hills Wind Farm

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Snowtown Wind Farm which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 00:03, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Codrington Wind Farm

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Snowtown Wind Farm which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 00:03, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: See Talk:Snowtown Wind Farm#Rename along with all other incorrectly named windfarm pages for centralised discussion. Donama (talk) 00:03, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename in line with [[WP:TITLE]] 
Talk:Albany Wind Farm

message: The article currently states that "the Albany wind farm is the biggest wind farm in Australia", with 12 turbines.
However, the Alinta Wind Farm, Western Australia has 54 turbines, so how can Albany be the biggest in Australia?
Martybugs (talk) 01:56, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biggest wind farm in Australia?? 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Snowtown Wind Farm which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 00:04, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Cathedral Rocks Wind Farm

message: See Talk:Snowtown Wind Farm#Rename along with all other incorrectly named windfarm pages for centralised discussion. Donama (talk) 23:59, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Snowtown Wind Farm which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 00:02, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Blayney Wind Farm

message: I updated Blayney Wind Farm, New South Wales. I believe the wind farm is notable because:
* It was the largest wind farm in Australia at time of construction (2000)
* The NSW Minister of Energy opened the wind farm
* The wind farm has a viewing area and interpretive center which apparently entertains some tourists, helped by its location next to a recreational lake
--Teratornis (talk) 22:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think you're right. Johnfos (talk) 23:59, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: See Talk:Snowtown Wind Farm#Rename along with all other incorrectly named windfarm pages for centralised discussion. Donama (talk) 23:57, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  rename 
Talk:Crookwell Wind Farm

message: See Talk:Snowtown Wind Farm#Rename along with all other incorrectly named windfarm pages for centralised discussion. Donama (talk) 23:58, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  rename 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Snowtown Wind Farm which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 00:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Starfish Hill Wind Farm

message: See Talk:Snowtown Wind Farm#Rename along with all other incorrectly named windfarm pages for centralised discussion. Donama (talk) 00:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename in line with [[WP:TITLE]] 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Snowtown Wind Farm which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 00:02, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress