Talk:Sarrukh

message: This is possibly the worst Dungeons and Dragons article I have ever commented on. If I was to cut out the plot summary, the sections with an in universe perspective, the WP:WEASEL words, this article would be reduced to the first sentence only. It really needs to be rewritten with a real-world perspective, or else merged with a topic which has more substance and notability. --Gavin Collins (talk) 09:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You are of course welcome to rewrite it! Hobit (talk) 19:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Be careful what you ask for. --Jack Merridew 13:28, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Do a good job in good faith.  14:20, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite needed 

message: 'Nuff said. CSHunt68 9:40, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want it deleted, that's your right. See WP:AFD. In the meantime, if you want clean-up tags gone, please clean-up the article. --Jack Merridew 14:49, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

text: At least, this help finding a common ground begore resorting to drastic solution. I agree there is to much tags, but the intention (talking with the writer before acting) is good.David Latapie (✒ | @) — www 15:09, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  The problem is, these tags are meaningless in context of the article. The tags need to go, or the article does. If you want to nominate it for deletion, please do so. CSHunt68 (talk) 15:59, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Kindly cease removing the tags without addressing the issues in the articles. If you do not understand the issues, the tags offer links to the various policies and guidelines involved and I suggest you read them; indeed, this is one of the purposes of the tags — to educated users about applicable policies and guidelines. --Jack Merridew 07:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please respond to my above comment - that, in the context of the article, the tags are meaningless. CSHunt68 (talk) 14:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'll agree with CSHunt68, in this context the tags that are being removed should be removed.  I think the tags at the top are mostly reasonable, but the in-article tags are quite bogus given the topic.  Hobit (talk) 19:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, I suppose the tags are meaningless in the context of an article written in a in-universe style. However, in the context of an Encyclopedia they have meaning, namely that this article needs clean-up. This is a message the D&D fans need to learn to understand. --Jack Merridew 13:26, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please remove the blinky blinky.  The issue is that if people want this cleaned up, they should be sure they are actually asking for the right things (or perhaps helping).  This one I can't really help with (as noted) as it is way out of my area. Hobit (talk) 14:19, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please nominate for deletion rather than adding meaningless tags 

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Serpent Kingdoms (), pp. 54-57 (note: checked against what is visible on Amazon LookInside). Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:23, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record Justlettersandnumbers, it looks like that content was added by User:JarlaxleArtemis, in 2005 shortly after the article was created and more in 2006; this user is well known for not following the rules. 2001:558:6033:DB:4D21:C7F6:3056:8E76 (talk) 23:38, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed