lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kazma SC

message: I tried to undestand this article but it makes no sense at all. Someone with any knowledge of this subject needs to rewrite this article so that it makes sense somewhat. --Tainter 19:26, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  readability 
Talk:Al-Arabi SC (Kuwait)

message: I think the Kuwaiti football club articles need to be semi-protected for a while, since they're a complete mess. --Nadia (Kutsuit) (talk) 07:09, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is a complete mess... 
Talk:Khalifa International Stadium

message: Khalifa International Stadium is the main venue for the 2023 Women's Islamic Games.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by FallandSpringOlympics (talk • contribs) 23:11, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Khalifa International Stadium as Main Venue 
Talk:Ambient Techno

message: Hello, here you can write what you want, I am not a top expert for now in this matter. This space is yours, but, with regard to Ambient music, please let me improve the section(s) regarding Czukay, Sylvian, Fripp, Hassell, Budd, Isham, and eventually the connections between Ambient, new age, world music, "celtic revivals" and finally "new age-ambient"-oriented tracks, works and artists by the labels ECM and Private Music. Is it Ok? Thank you for your patience, it is very appreciated, and don't forget that I am here to "serve", not to talk about my personal opinions (which could be not different from yours, who knows).Brian Wilson 14:15, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Making of a Godol

message: The following segment was removed by User:HKT, who only mentions in the edit history that he "Rmv'd info not relevant to this article. This is not the forum for recording a list of banned books.)"  -- but, the question is whether his assessment is correct, and where else should this be mentioned? It's no different to a "See also" section. It surely deserves discussion. User:Jfdwolff did precisely the same thing with the Natan Slifkin article (see Talk:Natan Slifkin#Section removed: Haredi books banned by Haredi rabbis). This deserves more discussion, not less. IZAK 14:34, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that an appearance of the links Larger than Life (books) and Natan Slifkin (as well as perhaps others) would indeed be appropriate in a "See also" section. If there was an article like Recently banned books by Haredi rabbis, that would be an appropriate forum for extra coverage. Providing details on bannings other than that of Rabbi Kamenetsky's book, especially when that constitutes its own section and takes up half the stub, is inappropriate. (BTW, thanks to Danny for the cleanup.) HKTTalk 15:37, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Section removed: books banned by Haredi rabbis

message: The article states: The word godol means "great [one]" in Hebrew.  This is not, technically true.  Hebrew is the modern language spoken by Israelis, its accentuation and vocalisation derived ultimately from the Lashon HaKodesh (the "Holy Tongue") as spoken by Sephardim.  In Hebrew the word is pronounced as "ga-DOL".  The word godol (pronounced as "GUD-dle") is Yiddish, as derived from Lashon HaKodesh.  It is a minor point, but one worth mentioning nonetheless, since the word in the book's title is different both in pronunciation and morphology from the word for "great [one]" in Lashon HaKodesh. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.69.216.169 (talk) 16:28, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Linguistic clarification

message: The article isn't about the book but the ban. Can someone add something about the book: maybe who it biographizes (yeah, not a word) and what it portrays about them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.81.169.185 (talk) 13:46, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article not about its title
Talk:Arab Cup Winners' Cup

message: Arab Cup shouldn't redirect to this article, it's a different contest for national teams. See . ~MK (talk) 12:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis

message: I believe this railroad needs a picture of an example of a paint scheme. --Intelati (talk) 22:24, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Talk:Anita Blake mythology

message: 150, could you explain your deletion?  As it stands, I'm inclined to revert, but I'd like to address your concern if I can.  Thanks, TheronJ 14:21, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: Uggh.  The mythology page is too long and getting longer, and the table of contents now runs six levels deep.  We should probably break it up, but there are a truckload of inbound links all over the novel and character pages.  I'll think about whether there's an automated way to fix the links.  TheronJ 14:11, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe I'll give it a shot this weekend, particularly if autowikibrowser can fix the links.  TheronJ 17:44, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Vampires information has been moved to a separate article Silverthorn 10:32, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The Shapeshifters information has also been moved. Silverthorn 10:42, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

text:  The Humans information has also been moved as it too seemed long enough to justify its own article Silverthorn 09:47, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too long 

message: We learn quite a bit about Quetzalcoatls and a little of dragons in general on page 544 of Obsidian Butterfly. I'm going to write up a paragraph or so and stick it uder 'Dragons,' unless anyone has any objections. Anakalypsis 03:01, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quetzalcoatl 

message: One area of mythology that is missing is that of Necromancers. Necromancers, particularly Anita Blake as a Necromancer, play a significant role in the overall series story arc and in the Mother of All Darkness story arc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daveras (talk • contribs) 15:14, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Necromancers  

message: So this is a word now, is it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.149.77.146 (talk) 13:09, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Anitaverse"?
Talk:Head over Heels (Paula Abdul album)

message: Is there a reason as to why the “O” in “Over” Is not capitalized?? Is there any way to have this issue fixed? Pillowdelight (talk) 19:40, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the reason why it's not capitalised is MOS:CT. Prepositions of four letters or less are not capitalised in titles on Wikipedia. You'll notice everything else at Head over Heels does not have a capital 'o' in 'over' either. Ss112 04:32, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  O capitalization
Talk:Cam Henderson Center

message: I'd add this to the article, but I don't have the sources (I attended, graduated from, and taught at Marshall throughout the 80's and remember these so clearly). Other Henderson Center headaches:
The uruthane floor were so hard on the legs of the basketball players that by the 1984-1985 season, a hardwood floor had to be installed on top of the urathane one (Bruce Morris' footprints were painted on both floors to commemorate the 89-plus foot buzzer beating shot).
At least one season of indoor track at Marshall had to be cancelled due to cracks in the uruthane.
147.70.242.40 01:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  And there was also... 
Talk:Don Haskins Center

message: Just wondering. I believe that the WWE should tour more in El Paso, specifically at the Don Haskins Center; like back in August 28 2003 on WWE SmackDown the infamous entrance by the late great Eddie Guerrero. jlog3000 (talk) 19:06, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWE needs to tour more in El Paso 

message: The capacity was listed at 12,222, but without a source.
I'm changing to 12,000 per this source.
If it really is 12,222, I assume a quality source can be found.--S Philbrick(Talk) 00:30, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capacity
Talk:Novotny (chess)

message: Would anyone oppose a disambiguation, to help direct users to the many people named Novotny? -- 193.6.218.9 14:25, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig?

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! Added sections, and disambig to top of article. JubalHarshaw 14:41, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikified
Talk:Adolf, King of the Romans

message: In several sources and also in documents of his own era, he is called, and he himself calls himself, "Adolf, king of Romans" - "rex Romanorum". This makes Adolf, Roman King, Adolf of Holy Roman Empire, Adolf, King of Romans and even Adolf, German King (Philip, rex Teutonicum...) quite acceptable names for the article. Shilkanni 14:26, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To match the other articles on the subject of German Kings, Adolf's article should be titled Adolf of Germany. He never was emperor so that title does not apply. All German kings were officially King of the Romans but the literalness of that title was rarely even recognized in their time, much less ours.–Darius von Whaleyland, Great Khan of the Barbarian Horde 00:41, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: I translated this article German Wikipedia, but the article there lacked in-line citations. If someone with access to the German-language sources could add these, it would be appreciated. Alternatively, someone could find additional English language references to add that back up the German material.--Texas Whitt (talk) 10:25, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: In-line citations

message: I removed the term "minor nobility" and replaced it with "the reigning count of a small German state". Since the Nassau's were rulers of an albeit small territory they can not be classified as minor nobility. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 10:30, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  minor nobility 
Talk:Shadow King (band)

message: A great deal of this article was lifted directly from http://www.foreignerfiles.com/shadowking/history/history.htm, making it a copyright violation.  I have removed this text, but someone else is free to re-write it in their own words.  --cholmes75 (chit chat) 14:29, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Instead of listing ALL the previous bands Vivian Campbell played in (which made the sentence too clunky for a smooth flow), I've pared it down to just his current band. Generally, when listing the members of a band, you don't cite ALL the bands each member has previously played in, you just mention one. Chillowack (talk) 23:08, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Can't list ALL previous bands
Talk:Imperial immediacy

message: De facto Reichsfreiheit corresponded to a semi-independence with a far-reaching autonomy.
This would be true in the End of the middle ages when the Kaiser was weak and thus a reichsfreie city hadn't to obey to anybody. 
But formerly ther was no semi-indpendence. The reichsunmittelbaren cities hat to do what the emperor said and they did it becaus the status of Reichsfreiheit otherwise could have been taken by the emperor. Roughly speaking. Foreigner 14:34, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: definitely would not say so.  I've fixed some of this and will come back to it another time.Auntieruth55 (talk) 14:12, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've also removed the European Law stub, since this does not fall under the category of the European Union.  --Auntieruth55 (talk) 15:41, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wouldn't say so

message: As I read the the disadvantages problem, the disadvantage of imperial immediacy is that you can lose it. Is this a correct understand? If that is true, perhaps the section should be removed. No-one would say that one disadvantage of having a billion dollars is that you can not have a billion dollars in the future, would they? If it's not true, perhaps someone could clarify it... I really just don't understand the point of it.
A real disadvantage could be say higher imperial taxes or a greater obligation to defend the empire. (I don't claim these happened, I'm just making things up that could hypothetically be right in context.) But just being able to lose your rights isn't a reason for the right to be a disadvantage.
—Felix the Cassowary 14:48, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disadvantages 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_immediacy  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.240.160.245 (talk) 02:33, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_immediacy 

message: Instead of the Economist, maybe we could quote a historian (James J. Sheehan and Peter H. Wilson have both taken the revisionist view) john k (talk) 14:31, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economist
Talk:Mk-14

message: The article says that the MK-14 and the MK-15 were weaponized versions of the Ivy Mike device. This is incorrect. Mk-14 was a weaponized version of the Castle Union device, while Mk-15 was of the Redwing Cherokee device, both of which were solid-fuel in contrast to the Ivy Mike device. The weaponized Mike device was the limited-production TX-16, an entirely different design. See http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Weapons/Allbombs.html. --Fastfission 14:40, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Academy Award Review of Walt Disney Cartoons

message: I changed the release info for this film to reflect that it was released on June 21, 1985, on laserdisc in Japan. This is what the cited source claims. I also added a second citation--this time to a print source--to confirm the laserdisc release.
I could find no evidence that the film was released in the UK in 1993 on VHS, as the page previously claimed--the citation that this information had linked to did not back this claim up. 
However, if anybody can provide proof of a UK VHS release, feel free to cite the source and add it to this page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayor of awesometown (talk • contribs) 21:33, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Releases of this film on home media
Talk:Wyre Forest (UK Parliament constituency)

message: For some reason a former editor changed Anthony Coombs' first name to Derek throughout the article. I live in the constituency, and can assure you that the man's name is Anthony (see, for example, this BBC page), so I've changed it back. Loganberry (Talk) 14:51, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Roman tribes

message: Shouldn't this page be named List of Roman tribes, with no capital on the T? Alba 14:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: List Title

message: Perhaps some famous members of each of the tribes could be named, rather than just a boring list? I think this would make the page more interesting.RSido 04:36, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous People? 

message: Need some definition on "voting tribe" or, as it is appeared now, "the historical tribes of Rome, as used for voting" Bennylin (talk) 08:20, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Answering my own (and future readers') question, here's what I found from Ancient Rome. Bennylin (talk) 08:23, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Voting power in the Republic was dependent on class. Citizens were enrolled in voting "tribes", but the tribes of the richer classes had fewer members than the poorer ones, all the proletarii being enrolled in a single tribe. Voting was done in class order and stopped as soon as most of the tribes had been reached, so the poorer classes were often unable even to cast their votes.
I was under the impression that there were urban tribes (the poor) and the rest were rural tribes, originally for landholders and/or aristocracy. Colleen McCullough's books go into great detail about this and that prominent clients were enrolled into the rural tribes to give them more political power. Cashie (talk) 04:09, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voting tribe 

message: I was under the impression that the name and identity of the tribe Pupinia was well established http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Journals/AJP/51/1/Tribus_Pupinia*.html
. I am surprised to find the note at the end of the list stating, "Two of the tribes are unclear; the thirty-fifth tribe has been found listed as both Succusana and Pupinia." I have seen academic sources, most of the them admittedly quite old and dated http://books.google.com/books?id=foiV3ERdRIYC&pg=PA584&lpg=PA584&dq=tribe+Succusana&source=bl&ots=Tc6jQTsSjg&sig=z6ERzyLw-demDfFa0cEwj6iKRJk&hl=en&sa=X&ei=j9TIUOz5EOiviQKrhIDQDQ&ved=0CE8Q6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=tribe%20Succusana&f=false , as stating Suburana and Succusana were different names for the same tribe. Since there are no sources cited for this list, except other online lists, which actually do not support the comment regarding Pupinia, I believe more complete citations are needed for this list.  
N5rmj (talk) 19:37, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  35th tribe? 
Talk:Belle of Louisville

message: I’m looking for basic information about this ship, which belongs in any such article. The info should be available somewhere. What type of engine powers it, with what fuel?  How many hp and kw, and what is the speed, now or as  built? Edison (talk) 20:22, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that would be useful info to include. Stefen Towers among the rest! Gab • Gruntwerk 20:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing specification
Talk:Dream Boy

message: There's a movie being made based on this book. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0889595/ -- 68.224.178.130 05:21, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie 

message: Compare with the book's description at http://literati.net/Grimsley/BooksGrimsley.htm - some of the sentences in the wikipedia article are identical, though it seems to have been modified partly. -- 68.224.178.130 05:24, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: re-written. Tony 09:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partial Copyvio? 

message: I read the book, and what I don't get is: where are two narratives at the end of the book? I mean, the main character just lay there and was just believed to be dead, just as Roy said, so I don't get, where the second narrative that is mentioned in the article is. By thew ay I just saw the film, quite good, some minor differences two the book and a few scenes which might be confusing because of the cutting. The only thing that raised my eyebrow was the last scene. Does anybody know what the director wanted to say with that?--Inugami-bargho (talk) 07:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't recall the two narratives either. I'll delete it. Haven't seen the movie. 23:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I can only recommend to watch it, the music and the acting is really good. But I'm not sure how someone who never read the book would react and I think the last scene was only confusing for me because of the stuff like the two narratives previously mentioned here and because the director said something, that he had killed off the main character, which is strange since nobody died in the movie. But on the other hand, that sentence caused a lot of laughs in the interview and I couldn't understand the original question and English is not my mother tongue so he might have meant something different than I thought. Anyway, watch the movie, really good and really worth the money AND the actors really look like teenagers, including some skin problems ;-). Films like that proof, that a big budget has nothing to do with making a good movie. --Inugami-bargho (talk) 07:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Narratives?
Talk:Beecroft, New South Wales

message: Anyone live locally that could share some knowledge about Beecroft? I've only lived here for 20 years - hope some other people have things to share. I'll see if I can get the time to take a few pictures of the place.
--Gibbo67 09:04, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locals 

message: I used to live there. Beautiful neighbourhood, pity about the dual occupancies. - Ta bu shi da yu 14:57, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ah Beecroft 

message: given recent announcements concerning the "indefinite deferral" of North West Metro, it would be WP:UNDUE to even speculate about how it passes through Beecroft. Secondly, the Government now has made no commitment to building a line past Rozelle. Michellecrisp (talk) 04:33, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: North West Metro
Talk:Patrik-Ian Polk

message: I aggree. Please remove what needs to be done. The article as a stub, should remain. ant_ie 14:57, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: In the Punks section, I commented out the reference to http://glq.dukejournals.org/cgi/reprint/12/4/614.pdf as it appears you have to sign in to access it. Correct me if I'm wrong. L1ght5h0w (talk) 18:00, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 
Talk:Mountains of Ararat

message: I decided to look for Noah's ark on google earth, but the mountain has a cloud over it. :( Hypershock (talk) 12:42, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: actually, you are in luck. If you want to look for the real ark remnants ("real" of course in the sense of the actual remains so identified in Al-Masudi in the 10th century, not the "ark" of "4000 BC"), you don't need that cloud, you should check out this area, see Mount Judi. --dab (𒁳) 15:07, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google earth 

message: "Armenia" appears at least since the 6th century inscription at Behistun (in Persian). Also, some parts of the Bible refer to "Armenia." Serouj (talk) 12:52, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Right.  The kingdom was called Arminya at Behistun. That's an exonym. Not sure where you're getting Herodotus from... Serouj (talk) 13:13, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

text: BTW the Behistun inscription is in Persian by King Darius. Serouj (talk) 20:51, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 

message: "The Book of Jubilees specifies that the Ark came to rest on one of the peaks of the "Mountains of Ararat" called "Lubar".[citation needed]"
I am removing the "Citation needed" as The Book of Jubilees... IS the citation. That's just plain stupid.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.185.5.146 (talk) 04:50, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "Citation needed" only says that you should specify the passage in which the Book of Jubilees describes the landing of the Ark. You can't just use an entire book as a reference. ♆ CUSH ♆ 08:16, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed?
Category talk:Ice hockey by year

message: Why talk about "2006 in ice hockey"? The international ice hockey seasons, and most countries, play their ice hockey seasons over 2 calendar years (maybe some countries on the Soutern Hemisphere play ice hockey calendar years, I don't know). Most seasons are named like "ice hockey season 1992-1993" and the "ice hockey season 1993-1994".
User:J 1982
:Because it's not about the seasons. It's about the years, I believe. BsroiaadnTalk 02:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The ice hockey season and the calendar year
Talk:Lirr (Greyhawk)

message: There should be a disambiguation link to the "Long Island Rail Road."
:So what's stopping you from making a disambiguation page?--Robbstrd 22:15, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: LIRR

message: This page provides almost no information above what's already in List of Greyhawk deities.  I propose that it should be merged into that page.  What does everyone else think? --170.28.224.114 16:37, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This page should, therefore, be expanded. I'll work on it when I get a chance. -Harmil 18:32, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Article expanded, merge tag removed.--Robbstrd 16:02, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge