lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Luigj Gurakuqi

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Historical Dictionary of Albania (Second Edition) by Robert Elsie, pg 178-179. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 06:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, a lot of the foreign wikis seem so have translated our article, including the infringing material.  (Main exception seem to be articles that were stubs as of today, and the deWiki). This article should NOT be expanded with material translated from other Wikis, except for deWiki, unless you have access to the text of the "Historical Dictionary of Albania (Second Edition)" by Robert Elsie, pg 178-179 and can confirm the material is clean. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 07:01, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Suangi

message: "If a victim is able to name the suangi that has attacked him, they are often killed and eaten by the victim's family in the belief that it will free the person's spirit."
This statement is ambiguous. Is the intention to say that the victim's family kills and eats the victim or kills and eats the suangi?
Tbarron (talk) 01:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What does "zombified" imply here? Zombies are an element of a folkloristic cosmos that is geographically far removed from the West Papuans. Zombies are reanimated dead who possess no own will and will obediently follow the orders of the one who raised them. Presumably, this means the Suangi somehow reanimates its victims after they pass away due to the loss of internal organs, but other aspects of "zombie-ism" are absent - the victim is able to return home, followed by a period of illness, and can apparently even communicate the identity of the attacker. Zombies are physically healthy (able to work tirelessly on sugarcane fields), but have no ability to communicate or return home. Surely, the modern-day popular fiction interpretation of the zombie is not referred here either. 
-- Ciaraleone (talk) 21:51, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Zombified"
Talk:Passamaquoddy Pleasant Point Reservation

message: I'm working on a section to add about the water crisis. It's pretty sizeable right now (notes stage) so I'm open to discussion about making it its own page. I will hopefully have it up this week. Light&highbeautyforever (talk) 18:59, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: Finished the water crisis section but I'm going to update references/check over the rest of the page in my sandbox as well; please leave suggestions here. Thanks. Light&highbeautyforever (talk) 16:45, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: All done. Light&highbeautyforever (talk) 02:05, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Water crisis section
Talk:Deborah Ager

message: Shouldn't her poems be listed in a bibliography instead of a list of magazine publications where her work has been published?ReadQT (talk) 19:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: done ;> Pohick2 (talk) 21:26, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Magazine Publications

message: First reference no longer exists. Ager's website is a broken link. Page won't let me update this. Techgrtde (talk) 06:32, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Chronemics

message: This article is a genuine field of study, with roots going back to at least 1980. (Chronemics and the Verbal-Nonverbal Interface) The word isn't in spellcheckers, Harper's Online Etymology Dictionary, or indeed other online dictionaries. But it isn't a coy independent invention for some student project. 
...No one would know that from the tone of much of the article, or the previous chatter on the Talk page (see Archive). This should be the first priority for anyone tackling this. Yamara ✉ 21:50, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done a little cleanup. The article actually has plenty of inline citations (mostly Harvard style), so I changed the warning template to "Tone". It's still badly suffering from lack of style. Yamara ✉ 02:12, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Edited out/around some of the worst style examples, but plenty remains for the intrepid. Yamara ✉ 02:56, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Encyclopedic tone

message: Much of this article is uncited and comes off as personal anecdotes, or worse stereotypes of human cultures. Not to mention the tone and style of the article is out of line with the majority of Wikipedia. Did this just slip through the cracks for the past 7+ years? Squevin (talk) 07:21, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This article could benefit from monochronicity. At the moment it seems to wander around trying to say a lot of different things at the same time. 184.67.135.194 (talk) 20:52, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Badly written and insensitive
Talk:Warrior Genus

message: Please explain. V. Joe 23:37, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A species of Tyranid from the Warhammer 40,000 universe. Cheers --Pak21 11:07, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Huh? (From the Old Tyranid Warriors Page)

message: Comments, suggestions, etc. How is the organization? I will make a page for the Gaunt Genus next. Those are the two main Genus according to the 4th Edition Codex.
:I think there's a lack of info on Lictors; the Warrior, Carnifex, and Ravener sections each have at least 3 DETAILED paragraphs with information about the subspecies, but the Lictor section has only 4 sentences and not much detail. Groundlord (talk) 16:42, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Any Suggestions for the Page
Talk:Capoeira/More info

message: This content was put into the article by User:Lottiotta as a comment (see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Capoeira&diff=128639880&oldid=128373783) and then has been moved here. Visor 23:08, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

message: From of Guarani language, CAÁ means weeds, plant, virgin forest or grass wild. The adjective PUÊRA makes reference to "something that was" “something that doesn’t exist anymore”. Therefore, capoeira is “ a small area inside of the wild forest which was worked by the man and it is now an extinct weeds. When the black slaves practice capoeira, they must do it in a secret way, so it was necessary do it inside a wild florets, distant of villages; but they need clean a small area inside the forest.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.208.30.179 (talk) 01:54, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:McGraw–Hill Building (Chicago)

message: When was it built?72.8.44.19 (talk) 18:23, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky

message: I am removing the claim that this is "the second largest city in the world that cannot be reached by road"; there are many larger cities on islands which, obviously, cannot be reached by road from the outside world.  I also note that the claim is unsourced; please don't re-add this claim without citing a reliable source.  Baileypalblue (talk) 08:39, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The second largest city in the world that cannot be reached by road" 

message: Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky#Demographics contains this statement:  "The population is currently stagnating".  The word "stagnating" is pejorative.  Webster's dictionary gives "stale", "dull" and "inactive" as synonyms for "stagnant".  I changed "stagnating" to "stable", but 24.21.151.167 changed it back to "stagnating" with the comment "Stagnation describes the population growth in common terms. Stable is not neutral."  I quite disagree.  "Stable" is neutral; "stagnating" is not neutral.  I'm changing it back to "stable". Wideangle (talk) 22:05, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thought, I have re-worded the sentence to use neither "stable" nor "stagnating".  Wideangle (talk) 23:02, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "stagnating" versus "stable"

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050307155915/http://gsti.miis.edu/CEAS-PUB/2003_Aka-Vass.pdf to http://gsti.miis.edu/CEAS-PUB/2003_Aka-Vass.pdf
Bolches yarboclos atte PAOK  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2806:1016:6:DAA:1DB0:4596:D083:60C2 (talk) 03:54, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello! I’d like to put up for consideration adding a popular culture section that briefly talks about how Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky was featured in the controversial 2009 video game, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. The mission Contingency features the player, as UK SAS Sgt. Gary “Roach” Sanderson, accompany his commanding officer, Captain John Price, as they make their way to a Russian naval base in/near the city. Pictures featured on Google of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky’s naval port look very much like the way the base looks in the game. LaPorting4Duty (talk) 20:14, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you know of any reliable sources that mention Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky in the context of the game? Mellk (talk) 20:30, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Popular Culture: Modern Warfare 2
Talk:Murwillumbah railway line

message: This line is not "closed" as such - the services on the line have just been cut; and there hasn't been any work done that would sever the line from the Main Line, either, as has happened for other lines. The official status is "services suspended". JRG 23:27, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Closure

message: In the diagram, the Ballina lines branches off to the left.    Tabletop (talk) 01:31, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, the diagram shows the line branching left when coming from Sydney Downsize43 (talk) 00:13, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction needed 

message: Why??? 
Is the blacklisting bot in need of further testing? Downsize43 (talk) 23:52, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisting of "The Byron Line" PDF 

message: "The Gold Coast Motorail took 26,000 reservations at Murwillumbah station alone in its first year of operation and in 1980, that number had increased to a staggering 51,000. The services cost $11.5 million annually to run, but the profit was over $22.5 million - nearly double than what they cost to run."
I have removed this from the body of the article. There are no sources for this claim. --TheArcadian72 (talk) 02:28, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gold Coast Motorrail - dubious figures
Talk:The Finest (Fine Young Cannibals album)

message: My copy of The Finest CD also includes a second disc entitled The Rare and the Remixed, comprising eight tracks as follows :
1 Motherless Child ;
2 Wade in the Water ;
3 Love For Sale ;
4 She Drives Me Crazy (The Monie Love Mix ) ;
5 She Drives Me Crazy (Phunk Phenomenon Mix) ;
6 I'm Not the Man I Used To Be (The Monster Mix) ;
7 The Flame (Armand Van Helden's Ghostpunk Mix) ;
8 The Flame (Beatmasters Full Fat Mix).
81.96.222.22 (talk) 17:05, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Rare and the Remixed
Talk:Head badge

message: This article is a stub, and nowhere near a B classification. From the assessment scheme, The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short... SeveroTC 21:30, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub assessment

message: Let us create Motor vehicle brand identification logo. For example [Mercedes-Benz] vehicles are idenyified by a circle aond a three pointted star, Audi by four rings etc. Peter Horn User talk 22:24, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Make that Motor vehicle brand identification badge Peter Horn User talk 22:44, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motor vehicle brand identification logo
Talk:1996 NFL draft

message: There is no need to have a reference that says he was not drafted.  We do not have to prove a negative.  There are three references that list the entire draft; that he is not on any of them is enough citation for the fact he was not drafted.--2008Olympianchitchat 04:56, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So how then is he notable? Is there a ref supporting his notability? Is there anything other than he has an article on the wiki?  Slysplace  talk ♫ 13:47, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tommie Frazier

message: An anonymous user who uses different IP addresses (2606:6000:ce83:8400:a0f1:8aad:7470:2c88, 2605:a000:140d:4329:b11d:cf36:5130:2d32 , 2605:a000:140d:4329:848d:f811:202d:ed5c, 2605:a000:140d:4329:c569:4f92:ca28:4a7a) has reverted the edits in the Notable Undrafted Player section of the 1999 NFL Draft, 1998 NFL Draft, 2009 NFL Draft, 1996 NFL Draft, 2007 NFL Draft, 1995 NFL Draft and others. Putting players that did not have a notable career and are just classified as undrafted. This is not the first time that it has happened with this user, so I would ask for somebody to review this case, because the essence of this section is being selective with the players being put there.Makers267 (talk) 18:56, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  NFL Undrafted Players section
Talk:1995 NFL draft

message: the Raiders were still the LA Raiders at the time of the draft. I notice on other pages 1971 the Patriots are listed as Boston which they still were at the time of the 71 draft. Smith03 (talk) 17:45, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

message: An anonymous user who uses different IP addresses (2606:6000:ce83:8400:a0f1:8aad:7470:2c88, 2605:a000:140d:4329:b11d:cf36:5130:2d32 , 2605:a000:140d:4329:848d:f811:202d:ed5c, 2605:a000:140d:4329:c569:4f92:ca28:4a7a) has reverted the edits in the Notable Undrafted Player section of the 1999 NFL Draft, 1998 NFL Draft, 2009 NFL Draft, 1996 NFL Draft, 2007 NFL Draft, 1995 NFL Draft and others. Putting players that did not have a notable career and are just classified as undrafted. This is not the first time that it has happened with this user, so I would ask for somebody to review this case, because the essence of this section is being selective with the players being put there.Makers267 (talk) 18:57, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  NFL Undrafted Players section
Talk:History of cycling

message: The article remarks that in Europe, cycling to work remained popular until the 1950s. This deserves further qualification. In the Netherlands, about 25% of workers cycle to work.  Rp (talk) 06:17, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cycling to work
Talk:1994 NFL draft

message: I have added all of the data from all 7 rounds of this draft to the page.  The Team links (all 28 teams at the time) should have accurate links (no redirects).  The same should be said for positions.  The college column is a bit more cumbersome, but I did rounds 2-7 and verified college links as I did them, so that column should be accurate.  The column that is still a bit ugly is the player column.  The names are correct; however, the links have not been verified.  Many of them do not exist, and since the link points only at the name listed, I'm sure several of them should be <player's name (American football)> or something similar.  
Additionally, the draft pages that are at FA status have color schemes for compensatory selections, supplementary compensatory selections, and pro bowlers.  This article has a color in for Pro Bowlers, but I have not yet found/looked for a site that has a comprehensive listing of Pro Bowl rosters over the years.  The compensatory picks will need further elaboration as well.  Rohdeaa 02:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional Cleanup
Talk:1990 NFL draft

message: There were several good players drafted in the first round; but Richmond Webb, Junior Seau and Emmitt Smith had great careers. Also, a 12th round pick named Matt Stover became a star with the Ravens. Never Trusted 16:21, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quite a good draft 
Talk:1988 NFL draft

message: Not sure if there is a particular reason this is listed this way. There are two 56s listed in the table, with one having an asterisk. No footnote is there to explain the asterisk (so that it can be properly formatted, too). Any ideas? —Twigboy (talk) 20:34, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number 56
Talk:Two-point

message: Based on the discussion on the jumping position page, my agenda for this article would be:
- remove the picture that is currently labeled two-point (arguably it's a release)
- find a good picture of two-point on the flat. It would probably be easy to find one of an eventer between fences on the cross-country phase, since that seems to be a favored position.
- explain and stress the difference between two-point and jumping position (I'm not happy with the "Jumping a fence" section at *all*)
- I'm not sure how much half seat/three point should be in this article because of its current name. I do think it's important to explain the differences, however. I would actually like to rename this article to include these several flat positions, except for the fact that I'm at loss for a suitable name. 
LochNessDonkey 23:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi all.  See talk page of jumping position for my discussion of a way to merge this article. Montanabw 17:15, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Major re-vamp, anyone?
Talk:1984 NFL draft

message: If there are no Hall of Famers in this year's draft, then why is there a category?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrickJojo9 (talk • contribs) 23:42, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the point of the Hall of Famers category? 
Talk:George Șerban

message: This person has an entry in Romanian Wikipedia, he was member of the parliament and contributed to the Proclamation of Timișoara. This is making him notable.--MariusM 23:49, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, indeed. I don't know which one is the most famous, though (they seem to be roughly on par), though I must say I am surprised that the Chamber of Deputies only has the other one's resume. I also have no idea if I got the birthday right: I picked it up from some Romanian Radio anniversary page, but, come to think of it, it might not have referred to him (but, you guessed it, to a third George Şerban). Dahn 06:40, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

text: More details are available in Neumann (I have used the book for the Proclamation article), but I would have to check when i have more time. Dahn 06:42, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1962 NFL draft

message: Slysplace  talk ♫ 01:03, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  PLEASE RESEARCH YOUR PLAYER WIKILINKS AND AVOID DISAMBIGUATION AND INCORECT LINKS 
Talk:William Adshead

message: 1) Cricinfo says Adshead had 15 career catches; CricketArchive says 14. I've gone with CA.
2) His forenames were William Ewart, the same as William Gladstone's. I don't know whether this is significant. Loganberry (Talk) 23:55, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes
Talk:Easter Act 1928

message: Not sure I like the Americanism of '9 April to 15 April' rather than the 9th and 15th, whatever Wiki's preferences. (also 'Act of Parliament' is the normal expresion , not 'of the Parliament' Esthameian 23:56, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ?

message: Now that we have ISO 8601 week dates, it would be better to fix exactly one date, the same each year, yyyy-W15-7. 94.30.84.71 (talk) 11:37, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  One Fixed Date 

message: An act that has never entered into force cannot be spent. It is perhaps fine to speak of desuetude, but it is not spent. WP:GF. – Kaihsu (talk) 06:36, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The words "spent" and "obsolete" (desuetude as a concept, which is considered separate as a concept under English law from obsolesce, is not generally accepted as a concept under English law, under the common law) are really mere synonyms in the United Kingdom, as far as the Statute book (of laws) is concerned, at least as far as the Law Commission (England and Wales) are concerned  (at least according to the modern form of the English language as it is used specifically in England and Wales, and in the year 2017). -- 87.102.116.36 (talk) 20:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spent?
Talk:Fell in Love with a Band

message: I intend to include a cover picture and more information please waitLionel101 00:07, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure thing!  --Haemo 04:21, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Would you mind putting up something about why it is a notable book soon as well? If we have a page for every book ever published, this would wind up being Wiki-Library of Congress. Alos, there is an "under-construction" tag that you can put on it while you are working on it. If you plan on doing a lot of edits, you might want to work on them in WP:sandbox first, then copy the info in. It helps keep the history a lot cleaner. Slavlin 18:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Hastings station (Nebraska)

message: Is this article's title—"Hastings (Amtrak station)"—well constructed?  I'm strongly inclined to change it to "Amtrak station (Hastings, Nebraska)" or, in light of its designation in the National Register of Historic Places, "Burlington Station (Hastings, Nebraska)".
--Ammodramus (talk) 19:49, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article title is fine. The best we can do is use the NRHP title for the NRHP infobox, and add that to this. ----DanTD (talk) 17:56, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:1956 NFL draft

message: The hall of fame color is listed as green, but shows up orange, probably because the pro bowl color is mixing with the green.  I suggest adding the third color, or changing the hof color while acknowledging the player has both achievements.  I doubt, however, you will ever find an NFL Hall Of Famer who hasn't made the Pro bowl. Badattitudebob (talk) 17:48, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: p.s. my arm is in a sling and i don't know how to fix the issue anyway or i would have. Badattitudebob (talk) 17:51, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color key
Talk:1952 NFL draft

message: should there be anote explaing why the New York Yanks and not the Dallas Texans are listed?Smith03 (talk) 18:02, 29 January 2010 (UTC)