Talk:Chitrangada Singh

message: Dear Editors! There has been a discussion on India Portal related to mentioning of caste of subjects. The point is that mentioning caste of people, who have nothing to do with their caste, is found to be unnecessary by few editors. Hence the caste of the subject person needs to be deleted from the biography. I am not deleting the caste as of now but am only posting this here so that the regular editors of this article are well aware of it beforehand and no edit-wars take place. For details of discussion held on the portal please refer Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Mentioning_caste_of_Individuals. Your views if any are welcome there or even here.  And.... as the reasons of exclusion of caste pointed out were "irrelavant to notability of subject person", "privacy of the subject person", "inclusion of caste is like branding individuals", etc. other information included in the article which also fall under these cases will also be removed after discussions. Examples of it included religion, non-notable spouse's and children's and parents' information, previous occupation, lived in places, non-notability related educational qualification, etc.  Your views on this are also welcome here or at the India portal. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 17:03, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I will, however remove it right away, since none of the sources in that section verify that she is a Jatt.  At a bare minimum such a claim would absolutely need to be sourced, just like any personal any personal details. Personally, I am of the view that caste falls under the special concerns of ethnicity religion (meaning its held to the higher standard of "related to notability" and "self-identified"), but even by the most conservative position, some reliable verification is needed. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Mentioning Caste

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:52, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Chitrangda Singh at Agent Vinod screening.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: It is evident from her twitter account  https://twitter.com/IChitrangda . This is the spelling she uses. So, please correct it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akashasr (talk • contribs) 15:06, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her name is Chitrangda not Chitrangada Singh!!!! 

message: Chitrangada Singh  IS A RAJPUT BY CATE NOT JAT. She calls herself a rajput on TV. So no changes should be made without further references.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.119.104.226 (talk) 04:57, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the caste claim entirely, because the reference did not even mention her. Unless we can find a reference where she herself states that she is Rajput (or whatever), we cannot include the info. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:42, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chitrangada Singh  IS A RAJPUT BY CATE NOT JAT. please come up with references. Singh calls him rajput on TV.