Talk:Oleg I of Chernigov

message: This is the conventional name, and gets 212 Google results instead of zero.
:Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
IF YOU CAME HERE JUST TO VOTE FROM MAIDAN.ORG.UA PLEASE READ THE DISCUSSION FIRST and THIS. ONLY THEN VOTE. YES! YOU DO HAVE A VOTE!
Now 12:12.
We should really disqualify a number of votes of those people who came (most likely) from that Maidan place. Can you imagine what's gonna happen here if I post a message at some Russian website? What Andriy did at Maidan is not fair, if you ask me. Only registered users with a history of contributions (participation, if you will) should be allowed to vote. And not people (like MaryMaidan, Paul_Kiss etc.), who voted here, and then went on about their daily business somewhere in Ukraine without even knowing what Wikipedia is. If this goes on like this, I will have to withdraw my vote and avoid participating in this farse. KNewman 12:15, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I could not agree more, but then we can always try and get some more people from Ukraine from here, here and here. So your suggestion, you invite people over.Kuban kazak 16:56, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move: Oleg of Chernihiv→Oleg of Chernigov

message: #Oppose Modern Ukrainian spelling is Chernihiv--Ahonc 07:23, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Oppose

message: I believe the problem can be solved by simply moving the article to Oleg Sviatoslavich. Kazak 04:36, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure if anyone else is OK with it but looks good to me, except he the correct spelling is Oleg Svyatoslavich, so you should have had some more feedback on this move before doing it. The redirect Oleg Svyatoslavich exists and has history created by a bot so it will probably requre a vote–Gnomz007(?) 06:44, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We can always copypaste...--Kuban kazak 19:01, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Oops, I was not aware of this discussion Standartization of Kievan Rus names–Gnomz007(?) 07:08, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes it has the vote above has been recieved as a fraud. See . Also do not do things like that  the last person got banned for a month. -Kuban Cossack  17:01, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem solved?

message: Note:the name of this article is wrong.De facto there are two princes whose name is Oleg Sviatoslavich, and both of them are rulers of Chernihiv. And it is very wrong to redirect Oleg Sviatoslavich to this article, because there are four (or for someone's opinion, five) rulers who were of this name. All of them are listed in Chinese Wikipedia, see here(Oleg Sviatoslavich).--Douglasfrankfort 07:30, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a disambigtion page is most important in this case. Once we of course restore the name that has been vandalised by you know who. --Kuban Cossack  01:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

text: See here -  --Douglasfrankfort (talk to me) 09:30, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well in that case do the honours of creating the disambig page. As for "of Chernigov" then I think if you copypaste, noone will die. The article's history of revert wars could not be more messed up than it already is, and there is really nothing to salvage whatsoever. Or just ask an admin to do this like Ezh or Bakharev, I am sure they will agree. --Kuban Cossack  11:33, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The consensus on renaming "of Chernihiv" to "of Chernigov" has not been reached. --KPbIC 16:43, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes it has the vote above has been recieved as a fraud. See . Also do not do things like that  the last person got banned for a month. -Kuban Cossack  17:02, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Arb Comm did not consider this vote as a fraud. You and your friends' personal opinion is just a personal opinion, nothing more.--AndriyK 18:01, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How about you ask their opinion? Moreoever the arbcom have fully prohibited you from moving articles. So I suggest you don't even talk about the articles' titles. --Kuban Cossack  18:20, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I read the ARbCom decission. ArbCom have prohibited me from moving articles only in special cases. Nobody prohibited ne from talking about it. Please do not lie.--AndriyK 07:53, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Please do not misinform the community. Read carefully the decission of ArbCom: "AndriyK is prohibited from moving pages, or changing the content of articles which relate to Ukrainian names". How the Roman numeral "I" is related to Ukrainian names?  I added "I" to the title of the article: "Oleg of Chernihiv" -> "Oleg I of Chernihiv" in complete conformance with Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_%28names_and_titles%29#Monarchical_titles. The reason is explained in the comment of the move. --AndriyK 08:12, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: There is a great problem