lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hergé Foundation

message: This page does not mention anything related to how serious Moulinsart considers the protection of the Tintin copyrights. A poorly written addition yesterday was swiftly removed (see the history, or the diff itself). I agree that the writing should be better, and it is drawing conclusions too fast. However, I think the spirit of the contribution has merit and should be part of this article. The current ruling in the Netherlands (meaning that Hergé does not own the copyrights but Casterman does) might have some serious ramifications, and only time will tell how this ruling will effect Moulinsart. There are plenty of high quality news outlets that have reported on the issue (in either Dutch or French, haven't found an English source yet):
* De Morgen in Dutch
* NRC in Dutch, behind a pay wall but you can read 15 free articles when registering. This article reads as a serious criticism of how Moulinsart bullies fan clubs when using Tintin images in their newsletters. The article also suggest the ramifications for Moulinsart are huge. According to the article, in 2009 Moulinsart changed course and started following the current expensive and restrictive policy with respect to the reproduction of Tintin images. Moulinsart refused to comment on the article.
* RTBF in French
* Le Soir in French
Someone at the forum tintinologist.org reflects seriously upon the verdict:
http://www.tintinologist.org/forums/index.php?action=vthread&forum=7&topic=5462
The Adventures of Tintin: Memorabilia_and_merchandise makes a reference to how Moulinsart considers the issue of defending its copyrights:
Prhartcom, you seem to have an interest in this subject. What is your opinion on the recent Dutch verdict regarding the copy rights? Do you agree it should be included here?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidovitch 007 (talk • contribs) 09:41, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism, copy right issues 

message: Should the article be renamed as such per this press release? Blake Gripling (talk) 09:00, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the Fondation Hergé doesn't change its name, it's Moulinsart SA which gets renamed (although the Editions Moulinsart keep their name). Fram (talk) 07:36, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tintinimaginatio s.a.
Talk:Salt and Sauce

message: This would be start-class if cited properly. Don Lammers (talk) 13:04, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've found the book mentioned but nothing else https://www.amazon.co.uk/Legend-Salt-Sauce-Britains-Elephants/dp/187290436X FergusArgyll (talk) 01:54, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Salah times

message: * This page seams a bit clumsy and doesn't flow very well.
* Each Salaat time description is very short, with limited POV detail.
** I would suggest adding more references along with descriptions from various points of view on each timing. 
*** This includes both the daily prayers, and less often prayers. (IE. EID, and Janaaza are missing quite a bit of detail)
** Some exceptions occur, such as joining dhuhr and asr as some scholars suggest.
** Will this topic only be on Sunni Islam? If not, then much more detail will have to be added.  (Or mark it as limited to Sunni Islam)
* The calculations are interesting, but maybe could be spun-off into a sub-page.
** There is only one reference to these calculations, and that page has much more clarity and detail.
** I would suggest that either more sources are integrated into a cleanup of this section/sub-page or replace it with a few links.
SuperS 5 (talk) 05:30, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup List 

message: I propose to remove this section entirely: times of the prayer are based on the sun alone, and the early Muslims whose practice is followed certainly didn't have to worry about the equation of time!
If thought necessary a short paragraph could mention the challenges (and inadequacy?) of translating astronomically-dictated asbāb into civil time, with a link to the Equation of time page - but I don't think it's needed, personally.Eteb3 (talk) 12:43, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Method of calculation

message: I'm vaguely aware (not being Muslim myself) that in polar regions, where the sun might not set/rise for months on end, that Muslims generally perform salah based on the nearest town where the salah times can be reasonably calculated. I think this should be added to the article, but I haven't yet found a reliable source that confirms this. Can anyone dredge one up? Edderiofer (talk) 23:58, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salah times in places in polar regions
Talk:Second Battle of Homs

message: Only Armenians and Gerogians were in right flank? funny. There were of course mongols.--Enerelt (talk) 09:39, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: About 200 Knights Hospitaller from the fortress of Marqab are known to have participated to the battle on the Mongol side (Mongols and Europe Jackson, p.175Jackson The Mongols and the West p.168A History of the Crusades, Volume II Kenneth M. Setton, see also Franco-Mongol alliance). The Knight Hospitaller Joseph de Cancy (Joseph of Chauncy, prior of St John of Jerusalem and treasurer of the Order) in particular participated to the battle, and sent a letter to Edward I describing the order of battle in detail.(Claude Mutafian 1988 La Cilicie au Carrefour des Empires, p.453 ). In his letter to Edward I, Joseph also apologizes because king Hugh of Cyprus and Bohemond VII couldn't arrive in time to help the Mongols (A History of the Crusades, Volume II Kenneth M. Setton Note 70). Per Honor et Gloria ✍ 15:52, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: + participation of the Knights Hospitaller

message: Page 418 of Trevor N.; Dupuy, R. Ernest (1993). The Harper Encyclopedia of Military History. Harper Collins Publishers. Though it says "probably 100,000".
It also says the battle was indecisive. --Ruhubelent (talk) 15:21, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harper's military encyclopedia gives the strenght as follows: 100,000 for Mamluks - 30-50,000 for the Mongols.
Talk:Harold William Bennetts

message: identified as a veterinary pathology ? - he was a veterinary surgeon - I would not call him a veterinary pathologist by qualification - the adb has B.V.Sc., 1919; M.V.Sc., 1920; D.V.Sc., 1931)- that is a qualified veterinary surgeon -SatuSuro 06:28, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Huh
Talk:W34 (nuclear warhead)

message: The article's current first sentence tells, that the W34 was developed and deployed during the mid-60ies, but further on are three different applications of that warhead listed, each of them with a production start in 1958? 
So the production of the (only) three devices using a W34 warhead had started about five years prior to it's very self development? Sounds quite improbable to me, really very improbable. Should that really be true, it thus would be a very interesting fact begging to be explicitly stated (and maybe explained in further detail) for clarification. --213.142.97.249 (talk) 23:14, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development time mismatch
Talk:Supranet

message: Hi, someone asked whether the text of this article may violate copyright. I wrote the original entry and I can attest it is NOT a mere copy and paste, and therefore there is no copyright violation risk whatsoever.
I do not know hot to remove the relevant template!!!!!— Preceding unsigned comment added by KHLehmann (talk • contribs) 11:24, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 

message: Hi, what does it mean to "wikify" this article (other than formatting a first sentence)?! Thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by KHLehmann (talk • contribs) 15:53, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. In this case, "wikify" meant replacing the bullets in the unordered list with '*'s, and replacing the smart quotes with unsmart ones. Basically, stripping out all the fancy stuff a word processor adds in. HairyWombat 04:58, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikify 

message: This is rather transparently an attempt by a company to promote an un-notable buzzwords they coined as well as their own brand. This is embarrassing that this article remains up. Searching this buzzword doesn't even result in mention of the company that created this article, rather the first results are for an internet service provider in Wisconsin. (Also, check all the citations, 'Garter Research Report', clearly falls under WP:OR
76.24.176.5 (talk) 11:37, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:SPIP]]
Talk:Kilrea

message: Dehra Parker's page says she was born in India.
: Ta for that, I've removed them from the page. Ben W Bell talk 12:10, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Conchur Dowds is a journalist with UTV and from Kilrea - a possible suggestion for the 'Notable People' section of the page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.76.195.224 (talk) 10:28, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately they don't currently have a Wikipedia article. Per WP:CITSTRUCT they must have an article to be included in a town's page. This doesn't mean they can't have an article, if they're considered notable enough, but the article would need to be created first. Canterbury Tail talk 13:04, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable person
Talk:Arreton

message: Where is the Red Lion?
Streona 09:45, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

message: For genealogical purposes a chronology of the civil parish boundaries within Arreton is needed (Arreton beginning on 1 July 1837, North and South Arreton beginning on 1 January 1894, North Arreton to Whippingham on 1 March 1907, the recombining of North and South to Arreton in 1960, etc.
2602:304:CDA6:51B0:4C7A:240A:36C4:2F5A (talk) 23:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a chronology of the parish names. 
Talk:Undermountain

message: OK it was forever ago since I started on this before I even knew how to sign in to wikipedia! =P So let's get this child grown up a bit and show the importance of Undermountain in Forgotten Realms and the real world impact it has had. Where should we start? shadzar-talk 05:06, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A discussion of Expedition to Undermountain and the massive Undermountain dungeon that was made on the Wizards of the Coast website would be good. -Drilnoth (talk) 21:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs work badly 

message: Would anybody object this article is merged into Waterdeep (city)? Thanks.—RJH (talk) 19:39, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll take that as a 'no'. Thanks.—RJH (talk) 19:48, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Picometre

message: i.e. less than the quoted minimum of 62 pm (for He).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.97.127.212 (talk) 19:10, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't the diameter of the hydrogen atom ca. 50 pm? 

message: Is the helium picture the Van der Waals radius? It's not clear.
It appears to be the calculated atomic radius.  See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_radii_of_the_elements_%28data_page%29. NRLer 14:37, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: In the articles
*THE SVEDBERG and J. BURTON NICHOLS;  “Determination of the size and distribution of size of particle by centrifugal methods”;  Journal of the American Chemical Society;  American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.;  December 1923;  45 (12): pp. 2910–2917.
*THE SVEDBERG and HERMAN RINDE;  “The ulta-centrifuge, a new instrument for the determination of size and distribution of size of particle in amicroscopic colloids”;  Journal of the American Chemical Society;  American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.;  December 1924;  46 (12): pp. 2677–2693.
µµ is evidently used to mean what is now written as nanometre.
—DIV (128.250.80.15 (talk) 00:55, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  µµ = nanometre 

message: The label of the diagram of the Helium atom specifies that the radius is 31 pm but according to this paragraph Atom in the Size section, it is written that the smallest atom is of Helium which has a radius of 32 pm. Either of the one article needs to be corrected!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ammubhave (talk • contribs) 13:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but we're making no claims that the helium atom is the smallest here. --Yoderj (talk) 14:29, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size of Helium Atom 

message: The following paragraph does not seem to belong here:
:The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) probe had been planned to be launched in 2025 to directly detect gravitational waves and would have been able to measure relative displacements with a resolution of 20 picometres over a distance of 5 million kilometres, yielding a strain sensitivity of better than 1 part in 1020. 2011 mission changes have put the fate of the LISA project in jeopardy.
Can I just delete it? --Yoderj (talk) 14:17, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  LISA seems irrelevent 

message: In the box at the right is wrote:
 Natural units	   6.1877×10^ 221 ℓP
Please could someone rectify this measure ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Windino (talk • contribs) 15:13, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unit Conversion : wrong
Talk:List of Gantz episodes

message: I changed Skores to Scores.  I know in some translations they have Gantz misspelling words, and speaking in l33t, however I don't recall he ever calling it Skores, so I'll assume thats just a typo.  Different versions of the fansubs exist, of both the anime and manga, some having him type out things in a perfectly readable manner with only the letter E turned around backwards, and others having him speak in pure l33t.  Does anyone know what was done in the official subbed and dubbed versions released to American audiences? Dream Focus 09:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Skores

message: Grantz 182.255.29.17 (talk) 21:35, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grantz
Talk:Chemistry.com

message: I inserted a generic stub class parameter for the time being. I'm surprised this article hadn't already existed. Keithbrooks 10:34, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub Class

message: This article needs some references to reliable sources, per WP:RS and WP:V. – ukexpat (talk) 19:48, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable Sources 

message: This section seems to violate WP:NOR.  I will leave it for the time being with a citation needed tag, but because of the nature of the section, I feel that it should be held to a stricter standard and not allowed to sit around uncited. It should be removed if no citation can be found. 173.76.204.216 (talk) 06:05, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: I recently read in the news (sorry, it was weeks ago, so I can't cite it) that none of the online dating sites (eHarmony included) have proven any more successful than any other method of meeting people.  As chemistry.com appears to be an online dating site like eHarmony, and claims to be backed up by science (see Helen Fisher's 2008 TED talk for example, which led me to believe it was a research project rather than a dating site), then it should be willing to explain its methods, and why they work.  And of course it should be able to not just explain why, but actually prove they work by showing the results. 24.57.210.141 (talk) 03:19, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Details of method?  Proof? 
Talk:Cepu Forest Railway

message: For Du Croo & Brauns see :nl:Du Croo & Brauns. Peter Horn User talk 16:52, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Du Croo & Brauns
Talk:Nokia 5510

message: I had the English version of this phone, and you can clearly see in the picture the Y and Z keys are switched. Also, it says Menu with a diaeresis over the u. Avengah (talk) 12:43, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The picture is of a foreign version 

message: I was always under the impression that the phone inside the media player enclosure was nokia 3330, not 3310 like the article states, due to the OS bearing more similarities with 3330 than 3310. Of course this is almost impossible to confirm unless an engineer steps up. Jokkk (talk) 09:04, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Underlying technology 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Wenli

message: User:Wenli
       run at Fri Oct 26 11:21:31 2007 GMT
Category: 3  
Image: 10  
Mainspace 1499  
Portal: 3  
Talk: 8  
Template talk: 4  
Template: 39  
User talk: 770  
User: 132  
Wikipedia talk: 1  
Wikipedia: 252  
avg edits per page 1.18  
earliest 23:48, 15 February 2007  
number of unique pages 2300  
total 2721  
2007/2  125   
2007/3  447   
2007/4  550   
2007/5  355   
2007/6  509   
2007/7  46   
2007/8  100   
2007/9  432   
2007/10  157   
Mainspace  
6 List of TCP and UDP port numbers  
6 Run command  
5 Logo.sys  
5 JScript.Encode  
4 Jason Frost (author)  
4 ComSpec  
4 Process Explorer  
4 Removable media  
4 The Dreamwalker's Child  
4 Foothill High School (Sacramento, California)  
4 Dependency walker  
4 DxDiag  
4 2007 Iraqi Parliament bombing  
3 Vista Customization Pack  
3 Wuauclt.exe  
Image:  
2 Lego Island.jpg  
 
Portal:  
2 Fish/Quiz  
Template:  
3 Spam3  
2 Infobox Department of Colombia  
Template talk:  
4 Windows-stub  
User:  
91 Wenli  
28 Wenli/monobook.js  
3 Wenli/w  
2 AmiDaniel/VP/Approval  
2 Marytrott  
User talk:  
22 Wenli  
6 Goodshoped35110s  
3 81.65.64.11  
3 Strangerer/Archive 1  
3 74.12.216.154  
3 24.12.145.177  
2 68.198.123.47  
2 207.6.54.86  
2 67.83.20.28  
2 Atshina  
2 24.4.105.17  
2 201.240.156.93  
2 71.255.183.106  
2 88.106.75.88  
2 71.221.223.81  
Wikipedia:  
6 Administrator intervention against vandalism  
5 WikiProject Microsoft Windows/Userbox2  
3 Introduction  
3 Sandbox  
3 Requests for adminship/Wenli  
3 Usernames for administrator attention  
2 Articles for deletion/Xbox 720  
2 Articles for deletion/List of computer and video games not released in the USA  
2 Articles for deletion/List of fictional detectives for younger readers  
2 Articles for deletion/Peter Franklin Jr.  
2 VPRF  
2 Articles for deletion/Pawel Plaszczak  
2 Articles for deletion/Student health advocate  
2 Templates for deletion/Log/2007 April 26  
2 Requests for adminship/Agüeybaná  
Retrieved from here, by Rudget Contributions 11:23, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:A Place of Execution

message: This article claims the book has two 'parallel storylines'. To me, this suggests that the author switches back and forth between the two storylines, which is clearly not the case with this novel. Rather, the book is split in two parts (called 'Book I' and Book II), with a 40-year gap of the action in-between. I am not sure how to phrase this correctly, though; any suggestions would be welcome. (If, in contrary, other users agree with the 'parallel storylines' argument, I'll just assume I was wrong, and the article can remain as it is.)
Clickclickdecker (talk) 21:05, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Parallel storylines' 
Talk:Barlow at Large

message: Some episodes are illustrated on IMDb with black-and-white screencaps. Is this a case of the episode now existing only as a telerecording? If so, might it be a good idea for this to be mentioned in the article? Harfarhs (talk) 17:08, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Episodes were 50 minutes in length and were filmed in colour"
Talk:Anhui Jiufang F.C.

message: IF YOU LIVE IN HEFEI OR KNOW ANYTHING MORE ABOUT THIS FOOTBALL CLUB, START EDITING! 
P.S I SUPPORT THIS FOOTBALL CLUB AS THIS IS MY HOMETOWN.宁雨翔 (talk) 21:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: HELP!!!
Talk:Cooperatives Secretariat

message: There has been no reference for this page that even shows the existence of this government agency. Neither a Google search brings up any source ever pointing to the existence of such an agency. Thus requesting deletion. --2607:FEA8:4E80:63A0:ECF6:C6AC:CB1:BF80 (talk) 10:52, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: For it to be deleted, we should go through the proper deletion process. I've found one scant reference to it (in French), suggesting it isn't a hoax, but like you I can find very little else (suggesting it isn't important).  I've asked at Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice_board#Cooperatives Secretariat to see if anyone can scare up any worthwhile references - if they can't, then we can proceed with the deletion process. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 18:25, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for Deletion
Talk:A Nice Cosy Little Disease

message: To user:TTN - please do not delete these pages about individual episodes as they are an important resource, especially for foreigners who watch them in order to improve their language skills as it helps them understand the plot and other such things. I see in Wikpedia that many other TV shows are allowed articles about separate episodes so OAH should be no exception to that rule. 
Roses2at (talk) 01:36, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  deletion
Talk:Charleston Chew

message: I can't find any references to Charleston Chews having a blueberry flavor now or ever for that matter. Same with banana. The closest I've found was a couple of blogs, none of which give any information as to when charleston chews may have been in those flavors. I have found information on a similar product: Bonomos Turkish Taffy, which did have a banana flavor. Can anyone else provide some information on the history of this candy bar, and perhaps give some confirmation as to whether or not CC's actually ever had these two flavors? 66.191.19.33 (talk) 00:08, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blueberry and Banana flavors? 

message: This article is listed in both  and its parent . Per WP:SUBCAT, it should only be listed in the more specific category.--Trystan (talk) 13:33, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. AldezD (talk) 19:54, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I see you have removed  and kept the parent , and just wanted to confirm this is the best match. The scope of  includes Snickers-style products that include chocolate and other ingredients. I note that the description in the article refers to a “chocolate-flavor coating” and the website refers to a “rich, chocolaty coating”, which I am assuming are indirect ways of saying that it doesn’t actually contain chocolate.--Trystan (talk) 23:25, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: On further research, this product has vegetable oil in place of cocoa butter, and thus would contain what is referred to as compound chocolate rather than true chocolate. I agree with placing it in the candy bar category rather than the chocolate bar category.--Trystan (talk) 03:59, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category duplication
Talk:The Play About the Baby

message: The lortel.org site shows the date the play opened Off-Broadway as February 1, 2000. The New York Times and Variety reviews show the opening date as Feb. 1, 2001 (links to those reviews will be placed into the article). The Dramatists Play Service script at google books also shows February 1, 2001. Logically, since the play was in Houston in April to June 2000, the Off-Broadway production would have occurred after that.
I am using the date that the newspaper/magazine/script shows, based on the preponderence of evidence. Flami72 (talk) 20:21, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Off-Broadway Dates
Talk:Odiham Castle

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Odiham Castle.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on June 3, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-06-03. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:52, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Odiham Castle.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Black Tar Heroin (film)

message: :"In a further update on YouTube she revealed she had obtained a Masters Degree and gained weight due to giving birth to children. In a February 2013 update she stated she was 15 years clean and sober and planned to write a book."
It is unclear who "she" refers to here.  My guess is that it refers to Tracey, but if someone who has actually seen the documentary could clear that up or add a citation, that would be useful. Zell Faze (talk) 17:17, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear who "she" is