lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nik Naks (British snack)

message: The nutrition information must be incorrect - there can't be over 2000 calories in 100 grams!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.33.227.146 (talk) 15:28, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: incorrect 

message: Twisties are also extruded fried snacks, but they aren't normally sold in the UK. --80.47.107.70 14:43, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are these like Twisties? 

message: I placed one POV template inside the second paragraph, but I feel the whole article made need a review by someone more experienced than myself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greg hill (talk • contribs) 01:43, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality? 

message: Not a citation, but I believe that in the 1990s, the Scampi and Lemon flavour one contained fish bone extract. Just my recollection.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.214.37.11 (talk) 04:27, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animal ingredients 

message: ...of the unusual twisty contents as well as the outer packaging. 89.243.39.147 (talk) 11:27, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a picture 

message: I propose at this article be renamed and moved so as to reflect it's UK origin and so as to avoid confusion with the South African snack of the same name (that is around 10 years older).  This would both reduce confusion an create an equal space for a 'Niknaks (South African snack)' page to be created.--Discott (talk) 08:12, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The UK ones are the older, original ones. The SA ones are a copy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.150.127.211 (talk) 10:53, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move to Nik Naks (British snack)
Talk:Topological order

message: I suspect the introduction would be quite hard to read for a lay reader: "non-Abelian" is a bit heavy to throw in in the first sentence. I don't really know the physics (only the math), or I would do it myself. --Dylan Thurston (talk) 18:34, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction could be improved 

message: Statements like:
"Microscopically, topological order corresponds to patterns of long-range quantum entanglement,"
suggest a need to sound important without actually saying anything meaningful.  Simply because it is in a published paper does not mean it's worth repeating.
I could say the same thing about any ordered solid.  It says nothing.Wikibearwithme (talk) 01:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction very lacking 
Talk:Bridge of the Americas

message: Wouldn't this bridge be more correctly identified as a Compression arch suspended-deck bridge? Or have I overlooked some technical detail(s)? -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 16:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I copied the info from somewhere else, and shoot, I didn't cite my references — sorry, but I'm learning.  Anyhow, if you have better information, I guess you should change it, specially if you can add detailed reference citations.  — Johantheghost 16:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Type of bridge design?

message: are here any plans to raise bridge clearance up to 75/80 m ? since current clearance was problems for some ships even before new set of locks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:1028:9198:E50E:3D1E:98D9:69B4:81BD (talk) 07:01, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  bridge raising ?
Talk:Leonel Brizola

message: This sounds to me like it is completely unfounded and biased on political views. Linking him directly to the criminality in Rio is quite a stretch. I'd like to see any credible sources that indicate his security police had him telling the police to be "soft". I'd also like to see the link to the US and Colombia that was previously posted. I'd actually like to see any source at all. Starghost 16:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Brizola and drug gangs in Rio de Janeiro

message: This politician was an integralist, a kind of brazilian fascism.Agre22 (talk) 18:40, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: He was an integralist

message: "Brizola was the epitome of the "negative left", a definition somewhat obscure, given the notorious absence, in Brizola's case, of clear ideological commitments."
This needs some clarification. I don't understand how a person can be the epitome of something that isn't defined in the text, and contradicted in the same sentence. Esoxidtalk•contribs 18:15, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement needing clarification 

message: The political leader of the opponents to Borges de Medeiros was the politician Assis Brasil, Joaquim Francisco, a genteel farmer, horse and cattle breeder who mostly exerted his leadership by means of political wrangling with the Federal government. Assis Brasil, as a diplomat, had earlier negotiated the Brazilian purchase of Acre, and for that received the honour of naming the Acre municipality of Assis Brasil, in which he probably never set foot. There are also various Brazilan prominent figures with the same family name, therefore I have removed the link to the name.Cerme (talk) 17:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assis Brasil (need of disambig)
Talk:Broadcast (magazine)

message: This article on Mud Men states 
:The first 8 x 60-minute series was History’s highest rating UK commission, drawing an average of 63,300 (0.25%) viewers, and was highly commended at the Broadcast Digital Awards earlier this month.
An alternate source here backs this up. 
A shortlist for the category happens to be listed in this non-exhaustive article:
:The fight for the Best Popular Factual Programme award will be between BBC3’s Junior Doctors: Your Life In Their Hands, ITV4’s Freddie Flintoff Vs The World, Mud Men for AETN, Pineapple Dance Studios for Sky 1, Spirit Of The 1940s for UKTV and Discovery Communications’ Stephen Hawking’s Universe.
This is salient because Mud Men was recently WP:PROP'd. 
From what I can gather from looking at award listings for other years, Highly Commended is not the same as winning the category, and I've found some sources misinterpreting this such as Qwitwa (talk) 17:32, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2011 Popular Factual Program results clearly incorrect
Talk:Joseph Lonewolf

message: I don't know what was meant by 'reconstructionist' in this article, but I'm willing to bet it wasn't supposed to be following the redirect to Reconstructionist Judaism (which won't be its destination much longer). For now I've aimed it at reconstruct, which is probably more of a dictdef, but more appropriate than before. -- nae'blis (talk) 16:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: reconstructionist
Talk:Merkaba

message: Merkaba and Merkava are two different spellings of the same Hebrew word, meaning chariot or tank.
But the Wikipedia articles are about two totally different topics, without any interlinking.
Shouldn't we add some kind of disambiguition reference at top of both?
Especially as some people in the Western world are spelling the Kabbalistic Merkaba with a  "v". 80.216.96.38 17:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a small remark. In Hebrew the word "merkava" doesn't mean tank. It is merely a name of a certain series of tanks, like "Patton" or "Matilda" or "Panther" or "T-whatever". Bukvoed 09:59, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Does anyone know how to move down the "New Age" Merkaba picture so its near its own article? Right now its out of place. -- unsigned comment by IP 129.98.226.148 18:05, 2 May 2006
:That's only happened since the article got longer recently; I'll attend to it... AnonMoos 02:57, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry that was my mistake (maybe I was thinking of Aramaic...) AnonMoos 06:36, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  move picture
Talk:Allegany High School

message: I believe that this page should have some information about the sports teams as well as maybe the statistical data from the past few years for the schools placement in Maryland. This page should also have some information about the band.
Beg4myskillz (talk) 19:51, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions

message: This page was mostly vandalism. I've removed a whole bunch of non-notable groups and clubs, and some photos that, besides being non-notable, appear to be school photos which are copyrighted by the photographer. I'm adding this page to my watchlist, but will be happy for help in keeping it free of vandalism. -FisherQueen 23:05, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: This article needs more information about other organizations.--Jesucristo301 01:32, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Organizations

message: The copyright information on the cheerleading photos identifies them as a 'sports poster of low resolution.'  But they are clearly not a sports poster, nor are they of low resolution.  They appear to be the traditional school group picture, which would be copyrighted by the photographer.  If there's someone out there who knows more about Wikipedia image use policy and can take a second look at them, it would be helpful.  For now, I've removed them, because I really, really don't think they are fair use as described by the information on Wiki's image help pages.  -FisherQueen 12:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: On the cheerleading photos

message: I added this because the page as it stands does not read like an encyclopedia article; it reads like a school magazine article or a fan site. The only female member of the team is Madison Martin, despite her attractive exterior, within lies a monster on the fairway - come on; that doesn't fit in an encyclopedia! Hopefully someone with the requisite knowledge will be able to improve it. Loganberry (Talk) 03:29, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It still doesn't. This is an encyclopedia, not a school newspaper. Information about individual members of sports clubs doesn't belong here, unless they reach college standard at least. Loganberry (Talk) 13:53, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup tag 
Talk:Bron-Y-Aur

message: Currently the article starts "Bron-Yr-Aur (sometimes misspelled as Bron-Y-Aur)". I am not sure that it's a misspelling. I understand that you'd expect "yr" before "a-". But "y" is what it says on the current OS maps, so is likely to be what the place is called. Can anyone local comment on this either to confirm or deny (decry, castigate, whatever :)) the OS version? 
Yes, I do understand that the OS can get things wrong. That's why I haven't reverted it :)
--Telsa 17:34, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling and misspelling
Talk:OurTunes

message: Why is the quantity downloaded listed twice? ~ rande
-----
Someone needs to remove the saveourtunes link from this page, they no longer seem to be developing a new version of ourtunes at all. The project has changed to develop a rival solution to mytunesrss. The new solution requires every user to have a our2unes software installed and running on their machine to share there music. What they are producing is a basic p2p sharing tool.
:Incorrect; SaveOurTunes has been updated ourTunes to 1.7g. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 (talk) 06:29, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It was getting ridiculous. What citations are needed? The link to saveourtunes.com is right there on the page. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 (talk) 06:29, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: saveourtunes.com is offline, ourtunes does not appear to exist beyond 1.3.3.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.2.131.193 (talk) 20:59, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Unnecessary <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki>
Talk:Campus of the University of Arkansas

message: Still working on getting information and pictures for everything but I have already uploaded a few images that have yet to be used.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:The_stuart/u_of_a_pictures
--The_stuart 17:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not just buildings, statues and monuments at the University of Arkansas? Or even better, if all the statues are also monuments, buildings and monuments at the University of Arkansas. Probably best would be Campus of the University of Arkansas. Tuf-Kat 00:02, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the Chi Omega Theater isn't a building at all and Spoofer's stone isn't a monument or a statue. --The_stuart 23:34, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a redirect from all of the ones you mentioned, Tuf-Kat. Hopefully that alleviates some of your concerns. (Cardsplayer4life 00:23, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think that this article should contain the thirteen non-contributing buildings on campus, because University of Arkansas Campus Historic District can contain all of the other buildings. This way, every building gets covered and they are sorted logically. Also: the buildings that were listed on the NRHP before the district was formed in 2009 have their own articles.
This means that this article would have coverage of:
* Science Engineering Auditorium
* Science D Building
* Graduate Education Building
* Mullins Library
* Arkansas Union
* Music Building
* Chemistry and Biochemistry Research Building
* Daniel E. Ferritor
* Science Engineering Building
* Bell Engineering Center
* Plant Sciences Building
* Harry R. Rosen Alternative Pest Control Center
* Leflar Law Center
* the stadiums and arenas if appropriate
As per this, all of these buildings are not covered by the NRHP district.
If this system is adopted, we should just move the text from here to the appropriate building's listing on the historic district's page. Also: the monuments (such as Spoofer's Stone and the Fulbright statue) should stay here. Brandonrush Woo pig sooie 16:41, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Campus/Campus Historic District Proposal
Talk:Lantmanna Party

message: Does the word 'Lantmanna' mean anything in particular? – Kaihsu 17:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Lant- is an adjective part connect with "agrarian" in English, -manna is an adjectival version of man ("man", "person"). Rough translation: Lantmannapartiet = "Agrarian Men's Party", or "Party of the Rural People", or something along those lines. "Farmer's Party" would not be strictly correct. —Gabbe 22:47, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/SourceForts

message: Why should this post be deleted? it is an informative article about the history of this mod.  also, just because its a mod for HL2 Deathmatch, it is sufficiantly different enough that it is original.
:If individual Spongebob Squarepants episodes have their own WP pages, there's no reason SourceForts shouldn't. It's a notable mod within the HL2 community, and a well-written article.. Joshua Nicholson 05:59, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Category talk:Nonexistent people

message: Isn't putting Santa Claus on here a little unnecessary? Seems more fictional to me...
This category should also include the article Women who want to date me. — JIP | Talk 18:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

message: What exactly are the criteria for inclusion in this category. I understand that someone must claim that they exist. But to what level of certainty do we demand that they are "nonexistent". From what I understand from the Pope Joan article the jury is still out. Others in this category seem gray as well. savidan(talk) (e@) 22:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pope Joan 

message: Some people believe that these people on the list actually exist.--67.10.200.101 22:14, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the people 

message: Although this article states that Praxedes is considered to be legendary, there is nothing in the Praxedes article itself giving any information on the controversy, except a vague mention that not all accounts agree. 75.171.12.244 (talk) 09:59, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Praxedes
Talk:This Woman's Work: Anthology 1978–1990

message: Are you certain the Vol 1 and Vol 2 discs weren't made available on their own at one point? I remember seeing them sold this way, though it's possible this might have been unofficially done by the record store. That said, I'm pretty certain one of the volumes was issued on its own when the revised version with Rocket Man was released. Can anyone vouch one way or the other? 23skidoo 18:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate releases 

message: The set was also released as a vinyl and cassette box, not only on cds. Dollvalley 07:52, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Formats

message: Someone needs to deal with the fact that "This Woman's Work" is also a song from her album "The Sensual World". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.6.144.101 (talk) 17:22, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Woman's Work (song)
Talk:Canadian Health Libraries Association

message: The copyright issue cites text from our retired webpage which was based on text in Bibliotheca Medica Canadiana Winter 2000; 22(2). The webpage is retired and Bibliotheca Medica Canadiana is part of Public domain. Issues of this source can be found online for the public to access. There are some missing years that are in process of being digitized and made public. WP:CP Librarianmel (talk) 13:52, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Librarianmel, being available for free online doesn't necessarily equate to being in the public domain for copyright purposes. WP:COPYPASTE has some more information. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:11, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Bibliotheca Medica Canadiana was an open journal that was published in print and is in process of being digitalized and is available to use: https://ocul-gue.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01OCUL_GUE/t4pdma/alma9953163981505154  - see the permisions for Bibliotheca Medica Canadiana under License Terms of Use under ejournals. The original author will be contacting permissions-en as well to confirm. Librarianmel (talk) 14:27, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I am the author of the article (or page) that has raised copyright questions.  This article/page first appeared in the CHLA's official journal Bibliotheca Medica Canadiana in 2000 and was written by me in my capacity as a former President (and, in fact, the first President) of CHLA.  It describes the Association's foundation and was published to celebrate our first 25 years. In my opinion, copyright resides with the Association (and I may also have signed it over to them at some point) but if I remain the copyright holder I give unlimited rights to it. The whole of the journal, whose title has changed, is  apparently in the public domain. I hope this will solve the perceived copyright problem.  If not please let me and others know.  David S Crawford.  Emeritus Librarian, McGill University, Montreal. DavidC (talk) 15:05, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Though copyright in the article "CHLA/ABSC 25 years on" which I wrote in 2000 and which was published in the Association's journal (Bibliotheca Medica Canadiana) Winter 2000; 22(2) probably resides with the Association,  I, as the author, am happy to release any copyright I may hold to it under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC BY-SA 3.0) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).  It should be noted that the Association has stated that the whole content of Bibliotheca Medica Canadiana (which has been and is being digitised) is in the public domain. David S. Crawford DavidC (talk) 14:00, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright issue
Talk:Pochaiv Lavra

message: What about these Cossack regiments ? Are they military units ? How do they relate ot Ukrainian Army ? --Lysytalk to me 11:34, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They are NOT part of any army, including Ukrainian as all the Cossacks are. Cossacks actually exist in a loose confederation of each other. For a Cossack regiment (or host) to become "official" (like the Pochaev ones) they need an official recognition from the Sumpreme Ataman (commander) of the All-mighty Don Host. The Soviet law of 1988 preaty much puts Cossacks as a civil service, and although not military officially, they have been seen in many conflicts, Yugoslavia, Transdniestr, Chechnya etc. As the constitution of Ukraine carried this law forward in 1993 it is identical to Russian. Cossacks have also always defended canonical Orthodoxy against any threats and are commonely seen as guards in Orthodox Monastaries. The ones in Western Ukraine have been formed as a result of multiple forceful seisures of Orthodox property by nationalist paramilitants and normal riot police. The regiment in Pochaev Lavra is consists of many ex-Soviet Parachute troops, mostly of native Ukrainian origin. And because the shismatics still occasionally stir up trouble, they have been more than a few times in action. I am telling you this because I am Cossack and have lived in Volhynia for five years (although not in Pochaev, but in Rovno). And have personally witnessed some of the worst forms of provacation and attacks by the schismatics and their nationalist supporters on cannonical orthodoxy. --Kuban kazak 18:54, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is very interesting. Maybe it would be useful to have a more detailed article on Cossacks in Russia and in Ukraine today ? The current articles seem to focus mostly on the history. --Lysytalk to me 19:15, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Have a look at my article, written about my own people. Kuban Cossacks I will in the future expand the historical section, but the article shows more about the 20th century. -- Kuban kazak 19:18, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cossack regiments

message: Uhhh, no. Have a close look at it. That is an image of the Theotokis apparation of 1675.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.174.9.102 (talk) 12:39, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mislabelled image "View of Pochaiv in the early 1800s" 

message: It may or may not be important, but "Zalizo" (surname of the priest) translates as "Iron". 2001:8003:E415:A101:85BB:F21:5DD4:C24F (talk) 10:41, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation. 

message: This is usually given as 23rd July 1675. According to accounts available on the Net, the sun became eclipsed. According to NASA modelling, which is the best I can find, there was no eclipse on that date. However, there was one on the 23rd June 1675. 2001:8003:E40F:9601:ED20:63A8:D7B2:E701 (talk) 06:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Theotikos - are we sure?
Talk:Hector Munro, 8th Laird of Novar

message: The early regiments given in this article that Munro of Novar was apparently in are not reflected in the source that is being quoted (Alexander Mackenzie). Therefore I will be adjusting it to reflect the source.QuintusPetillius (talk) 12:18, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Regiments
Talk:PdfTeX

message: Should pdfLaTeX redirect to pdfTeX given that LaTeX is a wrapper for the TeX prgramming language?
I think there should be a separate article about pdfLaTeX related to LaTeX
:Zven 18:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it should redirect to LaTeX and LaTeX should explain that pdflatex is just a different way of calling LaTeX which then produces PDF directly. Oneiros 19:11, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect

message: If the sentence is referring to TeX, shouldn't this be Donald Knuth? That's how I interpreted the sentence, anyway. 69.158.185.166 04:35, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It refers to pdfTeX, which is a variant of TeX.--Oneiros 09:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "originally written by..."

message: 4th link of the Reference section is broken.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.8.133.18 (talk) 22:52, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link