lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kukkutarama

message: According to the 2nd century Ashokavadana:
:"Then King Pusyamitra equipped a fourfold army, and intending to destroy the Buddhist religion, he went to the Kukkutarama. (...) Pusyamitra therefore destroyed the sangharama, killed the monks there, and departed.
:After some time, he arrived in Sakala, and proclaimed that he would give a hundred dinara reward to whomever brought him the head of a Buddhist monk" (Shramanas) Ashokavadana, 133, trans. John Strong. In John Strong, The Legend of King Asoka, A Study and Translation of the Asokavadana, Princeton Library of Asian translations (1983)  PHG (talk) 06:48, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ashokavadana quote about Kukkutarama
Talk:Nehru Museum of Science and Technology

message: This looks like a copyvio, but i can't find it online.--Rayc 05:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:KLVM (FM)

message: It seems to me odd that KUSP which is a call-sign and owned and re-assigned should be removed from history. It seems like it may be better to keep up a page called KUSP with history of KUSP including it's purchase and re-assignment to KLVM. Not sure of the best practice here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lyle troxell (talk • contribs) 19:01, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  KUSP Lost in time
Talk:Totally F***ed Up

message: In the director's comment track on the DVD, Gregg Araki said that the official title of the film is Totally F***ed Up. The title originally was going to be Totally Fucked Up, but when he realized that the film couldn't be distributed with that title, he changed it. So saying that Totally F***ed Up is the censored title is not quite right. That title may have been influenced by the threat of censorship, but it is not the product of censorship. It is the title given this film by the author himself. I believe this article's title should be changed to "Totally F***ed Up," but I'm not confident I know how to do that, since it is referenced in many other articles.--Jim10701 (talk) 13:56, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title: Totally Fucked Up, or Totally F***ed Up
Talk:Nasik Caves

message: The Gazetter published by Bombay presidency  has lots of indepth information on this monument and can prove as a valuable/reliable resource for this article.
--Kedar (talk) 07:42, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs a ramp up

message: It seems these caves are most generally called "Nasik Caves" (752 hits on Google Books "Nasik+Caves"), whether the other namings are much more marginal: 49 hits for Pandavleni "Pandavleni+Caves", 9 hits for "Nashik Caves" "Nashik+caves", 66 hits for "Pandulena caves" "Pandulena+caves", and 1 hit for Trirashmi Leni "Trirashmi+Leni" which currently comes on top in the article header. I therefore suggest we modify the article name according to, by far, its most current naming in the literature: "Nasik Caves", with the usual, "also called Pandavleni, Pandulena, Trirashmi" etc... in the header. Opinions welcome. पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 04:44, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming of the article

message: It is very wrongly, intentionally and mischievously mentioned that the place is holy Jaina place. Also it is mischievously mentioned that caves are Jaina Caves. The face is that all these caves are Buddhist Caves. The Jaina reference must be removed. 2405:201:1F:F164:700D:69A0:78C6:7592 (talk) 13:20, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong name as Jaina Caves
Talk:Hugh Foot, Baron Caradon

message: More needs to be said about Lord Caradon's role in the diplomatic activity surrounding the Six-Day War of 1967. Odd Bull praised him as the outstanding figure in the Security Council debates surrounding the conflict. 16:19, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Six-Day War

message: * Governor Of Cyprus Sir Hugh Foot At Home 1958  
* South Africa in International Relations  
* Paul Foot The finest campaigning journalist of his generation, driven by a revolutionary zeal for justice 
Scanlyze (talk) 19:41, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional references 

message: Shouldn't the sorting rule for this article be  instead of ? kupirijo (talk) 15:15, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  DEFAULTSORT
Talk:Dartmouth Crossing

message: Anybody able to upload a photo or graphic from the officil website? --RobNS 03:57, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK people, we STILL need a better photo. Thanks.--RobNS 00:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I put the individual stores back in, since this is a development in works, and im always checking
to see if my favorite stores are open yet.  If somebody wants to remove the links, go ahead, but don't delete the list of stores.  Beside with wikipedia now set to nofollow, links are useless anyways.
(unsigned ed. by Hydrogen Iodide)  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hydrogen Iodide (talk • contribs).
ILIKEIT is not a reason. use your own web site for the purpose. ! DGG (talk) 18:35, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to agree with DGG.  Wikipedia is not the promotional site for Dartmouth Crossing, is not a news site for the store openings in this centre, and is not a tenant directory.  If you want to see if your favourite stores are open yet, Wikipedia is not the website for you.  In its current state, the article is not much more than a promotional tool for the shopping centre.  Skeezix1000 20:31, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: individual stores (Update)

message: The gallery of photos is equally unencyclopedic--perhaps one showing the construction would be enoguh, to be followed by the addition of another when they finish. DGG (talk) 20:30, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They could be uploaded to the Commons, with a link to the Commons page added here.  Skeezix1000 21:32, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I will give it another week or so to see if there are any objections, but otherwise I will upload the gallery images to the Commons, add the Commons link and remove the gallery.  Skeezix1000 12:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't even wait.  Let's fix it now...  SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:35, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I never uploaded the gallery to the Commons.  Frankly, the images weren't that great, so it was hard to find the time or motivate myself to work on transfering mediocre images when there are better images on Wikipedia that need to be transfered.  As per the discussions here, I have deleted the gallery.  If someone is interested in transfering the gallery to the Commons, be my guest.  Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:09, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: the gallery

message: As for the other material, there appears to be consensus of all three previously uninvolved editors that the material was not encyclopedic. The present state of the article,  with Skeezix1000's edits, should stand, unless reasons based on policy can be presented for re-inserting the material. DGG (talk) 22:12, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I think it's a lot more appropriate since Skeezix1000 made those edits. I will try and clean up the photos too, with more recent ones, if necessary. Cheers --RobNS 04:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: status
Talk:KWKW

message: There is no usefulness for the KFAC entry to be merged with the KWKW entry.
- The area refers only to part of KFAC's broadcasting spectrum, the AM band at 1330
- KFAC existed for over 50 years and has a history of its own, separate from KWKW
- KWKW has a long history too, much of it in spanish radio broadcasting, and hopefully some knowledgeable contributors could expand on its history in this area.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.165.243.54 (talk) 12:33, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, there is need for some degree of merger to cover the early years of this license's existence. - Dravecky (talk) 07:29, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

text: I feel it would still be better to have a KFAC legacy page of its own. 76.87.36.128 (talk) 02:56, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  not relevant, nor necessary 

message: Los angles baseball Red Sox lost today make me. Sad try again tomorrow  that so much fun 207.172.68.194 (talk) 01:10, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baseball
Talk:Hemis Monastery

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI!  04:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:KXJZ

message: The about section of the capradio.org website has some history. I would like to suggest adding a synopsis of the history of the radio station. http://www.capradio.org/about Mylesgoins (talk) 01:03, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding Background and History
Talk:Batman: Gotham City Racer

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://psx.ign.com/objects/014/014576.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 21:06, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Ariel (comics)

message: In his Facebook page Mike Carey has stated he did not kill Ariel. Does this count as enough evidence to change the entry here? I have a screenshot of the conversation he had with fans about it which I can share somehow if it helps.
Mutant Raccoon (talk) 11:48, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: At this point, I'm pretty sure that about all you could do is say that she's "presumed dead" or something like that. I hope as much as you do that Mr. Carey gets around to revealing that she's not dead, but the fact of the matter is that until it's actually shown in the comics that she's alive, we can't put that info here. Writers change all the time, often without getting to complete everything they planned, and new writers aren't bound by what the previous writer planned to do. DeadpoolRP (talk) 22:38, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Fair enough. May as well leave it as is then as the characters think she's deceased. BTW I just had a butchers at the X-Men list; I'm glad wolfsbane made it in the end. Mutant Raccoon (talk) 22:44, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ariel not dead
Talk:KYUU

message: Seeing as I have incorporated much of this entire article into the KMVQ-FM article, and the fact that there really isn't a whole lot here anyway, perhaps this should all be merged once and for all, with this page being deleted. Anyone have a strong reason for keeping this article?--Fightingirish 15:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-10-20 Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam

message: Hello thank you for accepting this mediation request, I have not been involved with that particular page for a few weeks now (in fact it was due to the constant revert war and bickering that I stayed away). I believe User:Ulflarsen should also be invited here as he created much of the page and added early content and his input would be invaluable.--Realstarslayer 03:55, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other affected users
Talk:Chen Jeng-i

message: Chen Jeng-i is current member of Tatung, one of the only two professional football teams in Taiwan, and was included in Chinese Taipei national football team squad. He won Best Defender (Left Back) in 2005 Chinese Taipei National Football League. -- Shih-Chi Chiang 04:08, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rodney Pocceschi

message: This article needs more information to establish Rodney Pocceschi's notability under applicable Wikipedia policies. Unfortunately, simply being a police officer killed in the line of duty does not automatically make him notable under Wikipedia policies and guidelines. --TommyBoy 04:19, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You have nothing better to do on wiki than try to delete articles on wiki that have been there over a year and are about a police officer killed for no reason by a criminal scumbag? As far as I'm concerned, this makes him notable.Rlevse 11:28, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I have responded to User:Rlevse's comments on his UserTalk page. --TommyBoy 19:32, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Me too. Rlevse 21:16, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I have removed the "notability" tag from this article, because it conveyed the incorrect message that I support the possibility of the article being deleted. On the contrary, I would like to see the article expanded in order to fully establish its notability. --TommyBoy 14:54, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:List of major roads in Perth, Western Australia

message: Confusion? Surely any road or street bearing one of those blue shields must be some sort of highway? If not, the page needs a clear link to the definition of "highway" that excludes the "major road" group. Robin Patterson (talk) 13:04, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a little confused as to what you mean. The blue shields can appear on even fairly minor roads - Route 64, although a fairly major route in the western suburbs, takes in all sorts of fairly minor roads which wouldn't even be notable enough for an article on Wikipedia. Perth in that sense is not terribly different to its east coast counterparts. There's no clear definition of highway, in the sense that roads named "highway" can be anything from metropolitan shopping strips to freeways (e.g. large sections of Reid, Tonkin and Roe) and everything in between, whilst roads not named "highway" such as Ennis Avenue, Wanneroo Road, Stock Road and Rockingham Road would clearly meet any objective categories for one. Mind you, it's not as confusing as Auckland, where a link road or even in one case a residential street can be called "highway". :) Orderinchaos 01:50, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Highway"

message: I have removed Lake Road from this list, it is hardly a major road, and lost its few hundred metres of state route at least 5 years ago. 
It got me wondering, what is the criteria is for inclusion on this list? Does it have to be managed by MRWA (it will have a H or M designation on RIMS)? If so, many of these roads listed would be out, including several state routes. Does it need to have a route number (excluding tourist drives) or be managed by MRWA? If so, several of these are out, such as Farrington Rd, Malaga Dr, Crimea St, Vahland Ave, Karel Ave, Bannister road (the Canning Vale one, not the MRWA managed one in the wheatbelt) and even Drumpellier Dr, actually (mostly) built by MRWA. 
This list needs some properly defined criteria for inclusion, maybe something like traffic counts can factor in, and (controversially?) I suggest that state routes should not be automatically included.
My first suggestion for criteria is this:
: 1. Average annual daily traffic count above [TBD] vehicles per day at (at least) one point on the road (as found on RIMS data). If this point represents an intersection, then it must only include traffic actually on the road in question, I.e. not through traffic on the intersecting road.
:or
:2. Managed by mainroads WA, if so, it will have a H or M designation on RIMS.
:or
:3. Significant enough to warrant inclusion, (meeting this criteria will require consensus on the talk page)
An alternative method would again use RIMS data, but would use their named designations, such as "Secondary distributor" or "Local road" and would include anything in a certain category or higher. This is probably simpler, but does have some issues.
Mako001 (C)  (T) (The Alternate Mako) 04:19, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the criteria for inclusion here?
Talk:Here's Boomer

message: Is the origin of the name ever explained in the series? Thanks, Maikel (talk) 17:34, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:John Underwood

message: ----
About the notability issue: I grant that John Underwood is not a major figure. But I think coverage of the members of the King's Men can be justified by the company's intimate and extensive connection with the Shakespeare canon. The possibility of thorough coverage of a key cultural phenomenon is one of great potentials of Wikipedia, after all.Ugajin 04:27, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There are two other people called John Underwood who may be more notable. One was a pre-Civil War member of the US House of Representatives from Georgia; another was the British Labour Party's Director of Press after Peter Mandelson. Perhaps this should be a disambiguation page? Fys. “Ta fys aym”. 12:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there are more than two John Underwoods, I agree with the suggestion for a dab. page. --Roswell native 23:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:New MetroRail

message: When are you 'southerners' going to get this article up to the standard of this? Love to see this level of documentation, particularly about a newer capital works product unlike NSTS. Thewinchester (talk) 09:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Them's fighting words thewinchester if I was a true southerner I would be offended. You are right though the article does need improvement. Hossen27 10:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

text: http://www.newmetrorail.wa.gov.au/Default.aspx?tabid=204 has a bunch of plans that information could be taken from. TRS-80 08:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Come on...
Talk:City of Perth Skyworks

message: I've reverted an edit (), which added the following sentence: "Although, this has been viewed as sour-grapes by the people of both Perth and Fremantle, seeing as nobody really cares whether Freo (local term for Fremantle) hold's their own fireworks or not."
It doesn't strike me as something that belongs in an encyclopedia, at least not while it's worded that way and not while there's no reference for it. The reference already present for the rest of the paragraph could also be used for this sentence, although it doesn't seem the best. Brian Jason Drake 04:44, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fremantle fireworks

message: I saw a story on TV about more alternative fireworks being held (not just in Fremantle). It said that police didn't like the late notice and showed Peter Nattrass saying that they might not be able to cope with "four peripheral cracker shows". I have so far been unable to locate a reference for this, but as long as the Fremantle fireworks are in the article, these should be mentioned as well. Brian Jason Drake 04:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative fireworks
Talk:Shahr-e Sukhteh

message: The CHN links are no longer viable - looking for archive versions - but leaving at moment due to original referencing. Does anyone have any good images for the eye itself, rather than the dark ball in the skull image?Crescent (talk) 02:52, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Referencing

message: Why do you name the city "Shahr-i Sokhta"? In Persian, it is called Shahre Sukhte and I don't see why it should be misspelled. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.227.136.175 (talk • contribs) .
:I'm not the one who chose the name, but surely it is actually written in the Persian alphabet in Persian? It would be nice to have a transcription of the name here in the original spelling, regardless of which English approximations are used. Shahr-i Sokhta does appear to be more common in a google search. —ptk✰fgs 15:23, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: Someone please clarify the date of the discovery.  The article currently states: "In one of the most recent discoveries from January ... " What year is this?
Also, a footnote reference to specific external links would be nice. 
Thanks, Karl gregory jones (talk) 02:22, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Ancient Courier 

message: Much of this article was copied from 
http://edition.presstv.ir/detail/5668.html
Ploversegg (talk) 04:15, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largely Plagarized 

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—91.99.161.57 (talk) 13:54, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The ruins at Shahr-e Sukhteh cover a rather extensive area (151 hectares, according to the article), and both the coordinates given in the article and those suggested by you above are certainly within that area. Those in the article seem to be those of part of the excavated cemetery and are nearer the center of the site, and those that you suggest seem to be nearer an excavated part of the "burnt city" and are in the far eastern part of the site. I don't, therefore, see a compelling reason to change what's in the article. Is there some particular reason why you think that your coordinates are better? Deor (talk) 17:13, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Art Gallery of Western Australia

message: "The collection is arguably the poorest of all Australian State Art Galleries" - is this just someone's personal opinion, or has this been said by a verifiable source? Somno 08:41, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleted edit, and added note only to be added if reference is given.  Was written by an IP address, and typo corrected by a few people, hence letting it slip through the barriers ;) --Ali K 15:14, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool, thanks Ali K. Wasn't confident enough to delete it myself. :) Somno 05:09, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Opinion

message: I am not familiar with the referencing methodology used in a lot of this article, and they don’t seem to work. Can someone please confirm that they are broken and need to be re-done, or please point me at a description of the methodology used? Betterkeks (talk) 10:05, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are a lot of the references here broken?