Talk:Sentry (comics)

message: *Oppose - Sentry should become a disambig page. violet/riga (t) 17:49, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: The "rip-off of Superman" argument/discussion goes on so long and seems rather Superman-friendly and Marvel-hostile.
:Yes. It's bullshit, entirely. A factoid kept alive by constant duckspeak. It does not bear the slightest scrutiny. --Ben Culture (talk) 02:47, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Down on Marvel? 

message: Guys, the solution has already been given. Make a page called Robert Reynolds (comics) or Sentry (Robert Reynolds) and add a See:Article to the page. The explanation at the top (stating that Robert Reynolds is currently the most prominent) will be enough to direct them at the approiate page. Kusonaga 07:56, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, asnd since there seems to be enough agreement on the Sentry (Robert Reynolds) idea, I went ahead and moved all of his section over there.  Probably didn't do it right in terms of style, but hopefully it will work for folks. FrozenPurpleCube 17:33, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine, have it your way and keep the main article clogged up with unnotable and obscure characters, while shunting the main character off onto a separate article. *sigh* Why you couldn't have just moved the other characters onto a separate page, and keep the Reynolds character on the main page, is beyond me. --DrBat 01:08, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Solution

message: Damnit, DrBat, there are rules for this. Chief amongst them: consensus. No other decision was reached but the one took, and you acted against the majority. Kusonaga 16:36, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentry (Marvel Comics) 

message: I'll leave the rest for now, since my internet time's just about up, but WTH is Ward on this page? After my last post, I checked and I cannot find one reference to him being called "Sentry" (As in a codename. He may have been referred to as "a sentry", but I can't confirm this). Plus, many of the details (including his first appearance), are badly inaccurate (he first appeared a couple of years before the "first appearance" given here...) - SoM 19:14, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it was a user named Lajbi who added the Stewart Ward character back in Feb.  Maybe ask them?  FrozenPurpleCube 02:59, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Senator Ward 

message: There've been a few Kree robots called Sentries.  Should they be mentioned on this page, or should they only be on the (as-yet-to-be-created) Kree Sentries page? Dr Archeville 04:13, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kree Robots

message: :Image:Newaveng9.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Newaveng9.jpg

message: I propose that Val (comics) be merged into this article.  The content of Val (comics) is quite similar to what is here regarding the character.--Rockfang (talk) 16:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal