lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics

message: The numbers of resident researchers and visitors should be mentioned here. Do the resident researchers get tenure? AxelBoldt (talk) 22:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There's an allusion here to this being a premier Canadian facility.  However, the only universities referenced under the title "Training/Courses" are those found in a tiny cluster in South-West-Central Ontario, within an hour or 2 drive of the institute.  This is odd, given that Canada is 9 million square kilometers.  So perhaps it really doesn’t have a Canadian focus after all?
--Atikokan (talk) 04:15, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Review the credentials of its director, faculty, and scientific board. It aims to be an internationally accomplished research and educational institute, and appears to be succeeding at this aim. Waterloo would not have established a joint degree program if it were not estimable.  71.239.87.100 (talk) 19:15, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canada 

message: I have removed a lot of superfluous advertising language. I guess it was all copied from their website or something. Please keep Wikipedia objective and non-biased (something scientists should understand).
--EvilFred (talk) 01:55, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Great job thanks. I am removing the old tag and adding a new, now more relevant one. 71.239.87.100 (talk) 19:16, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising language 

message: Shouldn#t a reference be added to minutephysics?109.158.37.116 (talk) 22:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  minutephysics 

message: For instance,  the following citations are from the title organization: refs. 2, 5-9, 11-13, and 15. This is 67% of sourcing that appears, deriving from a non-independent source. This is lazy writing, even of self-promotional, and the editors creating this (even if, no, especially if from PITP) should be ashamed of this encyclopedic representation.  71.239.87.100 (talk) 19:24, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like it is time to remove the tags. Sufficient citations have been added to address the concerns raised in October2014. Silverchemist (talk) 03:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags being added because sourcing poor, non-independent, and otherwise primary 

message: add it!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4113:5800:4D8F:A1F2:F0DE:A7A6 (talk) 12:31, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  main table coordinates 

message: The "strong gravity" link takes you to a wiki page about an alternative to QCD. This is not what "strong gravity" refers to at Perimeter. Strong gravity instead refers to studying compact objects, where classical general relativity is important, or otherwise non-quantum aspects of relativistic gravity in general, including alternative theories of gravity or extensions of general relativity. 2605:59C8:26A2:B000:5862:12E5:C0AF:4B46 (talk) 17:50, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Strong gravity" link is wrong
Talk:Cries and Whispers

message: Is there an explanation of why it wasn't even nominated for Best Foreign Film? Ellsworth 20:14, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Off-by-one error

message: Off-by-one error was deleted and off by one error was moved to that title as suggested in vfd discussion. See: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Off-by-one error -- Wile E. Heresiarch 20:50, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: Someone familiar with C, please adapt the "security implications" code so it's more readable to those of us who don't know C (should use pseudocode). ~ Booya Bazooka 06:33, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: C programming language

message: Seriously?  No mention in the article of the humourous synonym 'Obi-wan error'?  That's a bit like not mentioning the nickname "Chewie" in the article on "Chewbacca".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.184.51.152 (talk) 10:24, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obi-wan error? 

message: I've always heard it as a lamp post, and never a fence post. That's in many years of software in the UK - is this a regional variation?
Number774 (talk) 16:47, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fence post or lamp post? 

message: I created a new image  to be used on :de:Zaunpfahlfehler. Feel free to use it here too if you like. --Neitram (talk) 12:33, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New image 

message: I removed "that extra inch you didn't really want" as a synonym of Off-by-one-error, added by 46.39.230.238  on 18 July 2016 with no explanation. I don't see any references to this phrase except for this page itself. It looks like vandalism. I'm happy to put it back if anyone can cite a real usage. Faught (talk) 18:40, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  that extra inch
Talk:Hampton, New Hampshire

message: This page now iuncludes info submitted in June of 2003, when anonymous user 66.30.55.40 created a duplicate stub. I've merged his/her info with the older, Rambot entry. Lou I 21:01, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please see the WikiProject New Hampshire talk page for background on the proposed merge of the Hampton CDP article with this article.--Ken Gallager (talk) 13:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:Megatokyo forums

message: Megatokyo forums survived vfd. See: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Megatokyo forums -- Wile E. Heresiarch 21:21, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed. Yay. ^_^ This article needed and still needs work, but I see no reason for it to be deleted; such a large forum is not an unimportant subject. -- Slowking Man 02:33, Jul 1, 2004 (UTC)
Under the circumstances, I would have to agree.  But what would you recommend in order to avoid deleting the entry?  Significant reconfiguration of descriptions, or...?
Interesting. I'm new here and I was just about to recommend this for vfd. What a useless article. Is there a source for the statement that it's one of the most popular english-speaking forums on the net? Different criteria schews that notion; registered members says nothing of active members, unique visits, etc. "Neko Neko Wai" came from a Japanese Chu-Chu-Rocket commercial (and was probably already in ubiquitous use by Japanese cat-lovers), not Megatokyo. Perhaps Megatokyo's community of loyal followers can have mention in a section of the Megatokyo article, not as an article for themselves. They've contributed nothing of an encyclopedic nature. --Psients 09:39, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Indecent assault

message: Indecent assault survived vfd. See: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Indecent assault -- Wile E. Heresiarch 21:27, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: Hi all, I was looking through the Sexual Offences Act 1956 and that of 2003 and the former claims that the latter repealed the sections on indecent assault, not that the 2003 act only added on sexual assault (as the article currently claims). It is also listed on the History of English criminal law page under abolished offences. Could someone more knowledgeable confirm and edit?  Erynamrod (talk) 14:25, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree absolutely. In my understanding the SOA 2003 abolished "indecent assault" and replaced it with the "less serious" charge of sexual assault (s.3). Some elements of indecent assault (specifically oral or anal rape) were been fused with rape (s.1). It is possible, however, that it might survive for cases that predate the 2003 legislation? In any case, the article here was clearly wrong and I am therefore I am inclined to doubt the accuracy of the other information in the section. —Brigade Piron (talk) 14:31, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Indecent Assualt repealed in England and Wales
Talk:Morphometrics

message: I was thinking about how more information could possibly added to the Applications section of this article? Maybe another application that can be included in the applications section could talk about how some scientists can use morphometrics in the study of cladogenesis and how possibly new species have grown from current species and how closely they are related by their appearances. Any thoughts?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arthur.181 (talk • contribs) 01:05, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible addition of information 

message: No matter — ignore and delete.
No article? sunja 06:46, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Some notes

message: The link from the word "suture" under the heading "landmark-based morphometrics" leads to Suture (geology) rather than Suture (anatomy)  96.76.249.209 (talk) 18:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree that geology is probably not the right kind of suture.  Fixed. Squeakachu (talk) 18:44, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Suture” link in landmark-based section
Talk:William Erasmus Darwin

message: William Erasmus Darwin survived vfd as there was no agreement about what to do. See: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Darwin kids -- Wile E. Heresiarch 21:47, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: VFD? HE HAS A BIOGRAPHY IN OXFORD DICTIONARY OF NATIONAL BIOGRAPHY, WHICH IS RIDDLED WITH ERRORS: THERE ARE THREE IN ONE KEY PARAGRAPH ALONE: ALL THREE ARE CORRECT IN THE WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE. 2.30.189.160 (talk) 13:19, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: VFD
Talk:Alvan T. Fuller

message: Is it Alvin or Alvan?  RickK 21:57, Jun 26, 2004 (UTC)
:It's Alvan, or at least that's what the US Senate and Massachusetts think. -- Cyrius|✎ 04:59, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It doesn't seem like the Robert Grant on the Sacco-Vanzetti commission and the Robert Grant (soldier) who has a Wikipedia article are the same person.  One was a retired probate judge in 1927, and the other was an English recipient of the Victoria Cross born around 1837.  I'm removing the wikilink on this page until someone proves me wrong.
Anville 19:00, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robert Grant 

message: The second paragraph (starting with "Governor Fuller faced ...") of the Biography section is word-for-word identical to Fuller's official Governor Biography (as linked in the External Link section: ).  DeusX (talk) 11:56, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography Section: Plagiarism?
Talk:Trent Reznor

message: Not sure why the main photo is 15 years old on an article about a living person. 47.219.177.10 (talk) 04:59, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless someone else releases a new photo under a free license, we don't have many options. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 17:28, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: it's a bad photo, it looks a little video game-y. An older photo might fit better even. UlyssesYYZ (talk) 05:25, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo from 2008
Talk:Jakaltek language

message: The list of phonemes does not include the n-diaresis. Is it an alternate way of writing ŋ?  — Gwalla | Talk 20:16, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An article rename is proposed for this page and a number of other Mayan language articles. Please see and comment at the centralised discussion for these at Talk:Mayan languages.--cjllw | TALK 05:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move proposal (Aug 2006)

message: Identities of phonemes deduced from scattered tidbits, need to be confirmed. — kwami (talk) 02:06, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  phonemes 

message: How do I say hello 2601:643:867F:6C70:F05A:5D90:5840:9291 (talk) 06:53, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Words
Talk:Dodge Charger

message: I put a cleanup tag on this article because I think it needs to be better organized, and it sounds unencyclopedic in some places (such as the first-to-last paragraph of the "1966-1967" section). --ApolloBoy 02:45, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and seperated the Birth of the Charger from the 1966-67 section. Is there just one big template that we can use for ALL automotive sections? I noticed that if you go to Pontiac GTO for instance all of the years are seperated into their own yearly paragraphs but if you look at Dodge Challenger it lumps all of the years together into one. So can we get one template? Please? KLRMNKY 02:11, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 1966-1967 section sounds encyclopedic to me. I also cleaned up the general layout, added years, some information. Pictures were all messed up, but not anymore.
FastbackJon 06:20, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks a lot better FastbackJon. KLRMNKY 01:19, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Because it reads like an advertisement, not an encyclopedia.  "whopping"?  Seriously?  108.249.235.44 (talk) 23:43, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why this needs to be cleaned up 

message: This page was WAY too long, with three entirely different cars.  If ever a car page demanded splitting up, this was it.  So I've done it.  --SFoskett 16:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Split it up
Talk:Uncle Fester

message: Why are you delected the foto of uncle fester?Lee M 00:21, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is an entry I just made on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Addams_Family but perhaps should repeat it here. In the beginning of the Addams Family Movie, as Tully Alford walks through the mansion to meet Gomez, he passes by a picture of Fester with a lighted candle. Under the picture is a small plate that says "Uncle Fester 1947-????". This would make Fester 17 when the series originally aired in 1964 and 19 when it went off the air in 1966. Working backwards, the movie was released in 1991, and Fester had been missing for 25 years, that is to say, since 1966 - when he was 19 years old and the original series was canceled! Of course, I am not sure that this needs to be or should be incorporated into the article. Also I note that, according to the "book" by "Sharkey" Fester was drafted, which could be proof for a draft-age Fester in the mid-60's, but I have not read the book and in fact would rather lose my eyesight than do so, as it seems QUITE stupid. Hi There 14:52, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Interesting Time-line For Fester

message: I wonder if there is any evidence that his name was inspired by Twelfth Night's Feste, the fool?  Grassynoel (talk) 05:04, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: The charcter design looks interesting enough to catch your eye, while the voice is just a bit annoying, what are your opinions? DEATHDOOM76 (talk) 18:10, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What do you think of the 2019 Uncle Fester portrayed by Nick Kroll? 

message: He looks like my papa 2A00:23C6:7583:2B00:D5BC:282A:9251:CAEB (talk) 16:50, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie
Talk:400-series highways

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Interstate Highways in Ontario and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 29#Interstate Highways in Ontario until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 10:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Interstate Highways in Ontario" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Neil Gaiman

message: Please add "Ghost story writers" to article; category is correct, as he written ghost stories, including Coraline and The Graveyard Book. Thanks. 79.67.152.6 (talk) 01:16, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Bump. 2A00:23C7:ED18:A301:E4D6:43FF:A785:F982 (talk) 15:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request

message: Was announced today the he is no longer with Amanda Palmer, and will be getting a divorce. (again) Aka charlos (talk) 01:57, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Divorce 

message: change misspelled "Anasi Boys" to "Anansi Boys" Jarlapple (talk) 05:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Cannolis (talk) 08:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 February 2023 

message: Please add Staged season 3 episode 1 of Staged to the Filmography section. As seen here: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt23713410/ 2600:1700:96F1:550:51C8:921A:976C:B54D (talk) 01:01, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 September 2023
Talk:Nic Endo

message: After making some edits to this article I discovered that the initial version was copyvio from http://atr.webz.cz/23.html and subsequent minor edits (mine and others') don't cure it.  Adding copyvio notice. JamesMLane 01:20, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Down at the bottom of the page there's a copyright notice, so I think it's fairly natural to assume that the material is subject to copyright laws.  If you want to make the effort to get an OK from the copyright owner, of course, that's fine.  Just note that it's not enough to get permission for a one-time use.  The owner has to release it under the GNU Free Documentation License.  If you know enough about the field to have confidence writing about it, you could just take the information from the promo page (and elsewhere) and write a new article.  The original isn't all that well written anyway.  Go ahead, take a shot at writing something, even if it isn't perfect.  Other people here will jump in and improve it, once you get it started. JamesMLane 03:34, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)

text: Oh, I should've mentioned, if you do start a new article, put it here: Nic Endo/Temp.  That way it will survive if the main article is deleted for copyvio.  JamesMLane 03:51, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The original has now been deleted and the temp version moved into its place. Angela. 20:35, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nate Thurmond

message: First, basketball fans should know what a competitor and athlete this guy was. Think Bill Russell or Ben Wallace. Thurmond, however, wasn't shy about scoring 20 points a game if his team needed it. He was an underrated passer as well. Mostly, he is remembered for his intense defense, which once knocked Kareem Abdul Jabbar from the playoffs, his shot blocking and rebounding. Thurmond is one of the all-time greats in those three areas and definitely would still star today.
In high school, he was in the shadow of upper classman Gus Johnson, then All-Ohio legend Jerry Lucas.
He was a MAC star at Bowling Green while other schools and players again received more attention. He was not even on the radar when the vaunted 1960 U.S. Olympic team was put together.
Drafted for the San Fransisco Warriors, who had just moved from Philadelphia, Thurmond became the protege' of Wilt Chamberlain, who worked the youngster hard in practice and introduced him to weightlifting. Thurmond's improvement made Chamberlain's large contract expendable.
The Warrior club he inherited was hindered by ABA defections and injuries. Star performers paraded thru the roster over the late 60s and early 70s. Thurmond himself played so intensely at time, he was prone to injury.
He was traded to Chicago for an inferior center, Cliff Ray. The Warriors then won the NBA title without him. Chicago had an opportunity to contend, but chose to start Tom Boerwinkle ahead of him in the playoffs against his old Warriors team.
A chance in Cleveland showed Thurmond to still more fans, but the Cavaliers were eliminated by Boston. Goaltending was counted as a foul that year, and Thurmond was the victim of several very controversial calls during that playoff.
He never got his ring but played like a champion. He was easily named one of the NBA's best ever in 1996. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.255.185.157 (talk) 02:14, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Points on Thurmond 

message: The main picture is of him fight for a rebound with wilt chamberlain and because it doesn't say Thurmond (Left) Chamberlain (Right) it could be confusing for someone who doesn't know what either one looks like and mistake one for the other. This could be solved even more simply by using a picture of just Thurmond instead of one where Chamberlain is closer to the camera.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.220.178.190 (talk) 15:13, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main picture misunderstanding 

message: It better NBA record "one of three players in NBA history to record over 40 rebounds in a game" rather than "one of four players in NBA history to record 40 or more rebounds in a game".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.32.244.247 (talk) 14:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of three players in NBA history
Talk:Ligurian Sea

message: Article says:
The sea borders the countries Italy, France, and Monaco, and the Tyrrhenian and Mediterranean Seas
Surely the Ligurian AND the Tyrrhenian are both part of the Mediterranean. Ordinary Person 23:10, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the Ligurian Sea is part of the Mediterranean Sea. However, it can also be considered a seperate sea. It depends on the person you ask. Most people will say: yes, the Ligurian Sea is part of the Mediterranean, just as (for example) the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Ionian Sea are. However, the major part of the Mediterranean has no "alternative name" and is just known as the "Mediterranean Sea". So in a sence the text of the article is true: "the Ligurian Sea borders the Mediterranean Sea", despite the fact that it can also be considred a part of that sea. DaMatriX 17:55, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mediterranean

message: I hesitate to change this because the original author may know something I'm missing.  But when it says "between the Italian Riviera (Liguria and Tuscany) and the islands of Corsica and Elba," isn't the mention of Elba misleading?  According to the description of the extent of the Ligurian Sea (which, I was glad to see, agrees with the description of the Tyrrhenian Sea as to where their boundary is), isn't Elba entirely within the Tyrrhenian Sea?  The boundary goes almost directly north from the north end of Corsica, and Elba is east of Corsica.  Is that not right?  Wouldn't it be more correct just to say "between the Italian Riviera ... and Corsica"?
Gms3591 (talk) 11:01, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite right. I will make some amendments. Bazonka (talk) 16:21, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elba? 

message: This 1983 free paper (doi 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1983.tb05004.x) highlights a very less known aspect of the Lugurian Sea: a mean depth of 2 chilometers and the existence of seiche wave wuth a mean period of 5.8 hours.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.223.69.53 (talk) 20:24, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seiche waves and high depth
Talk:List of English districts by ethnicity

message: How were they amalgamated? Does afro-caribbean include african (they were separate categories). Were the mixed race categories ignored or amalgamated? Secretlondon 02:16, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: leicester is ranked as more ethnically diverse than waltham forest simply because the white population is slightly lower, hoever in waltham forest 2 random people are more likly to be from different ethnic groups. Leicester is more Bi-ethnic (white and south asian) than multi-ethnic/diverse but for some reason is ranked as more diverse.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.19.188.249 (talk) 14:28, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is meant by ethnic diversity here 

message: The 2011 census results have been revealed judging by what I've been reading in the papers this week. Shouldn't this page be updated?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.197.154.180 (talk) 07:42, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update?
Talk:Star of the Sea College

message: The College is said to be "Irish", but there seems to be no requirement to actually be Irish at any point.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.194.200 (talk) 16:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irish 