Talk:Belper

message: If the references were evenly distributed then this would be near a B. See Derby School Victuallers 14:13, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the standard infobox for UK places.  I don't know if there's anyway to change the size.  I do think there's a lot of benefit to having standardized summary information like this.   Sorry about the layout, I should have noticed.   I'll have a look at how to make it look better - I haven't done that before, so it may take a day or two to get right :-).  Is it just the layout problem you don't like about the infobox? --SiobhanHansa 16:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

text: To adjust for the info box I've integrated the photos into relevent sections of the article. There are still some layout issues with the first couple of photos where they are in the article at the same level as the info box.  I can't seem to find a good solution for this that will work with any browser width.  I'll look into it further. --SiobhanHansa 03:58, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've had a little go at it which (on my browser) puts the images on the right and de-emphasises the size of the infobox. See what you think Chevin 07:10, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Works for me!  Thanks. --SiobhanHansa 12:59, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: Quote: Foreign Secretary 1965-7 – represented Belper from 1945 until 1970, but never actually lived here.He kept a flat in Swadlincote at the opposite end of the constituency
He had a large house on Belper Lane and kept residence there for at least a few years (personal mempory) Chevin (talk) 06:48, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: George Brown, M.P.

message: I propose that Blackbrook, Derbyshire be merged into Belper. The former is a very brief stub that only provides the location of the hamlet. As such, it can be better served by a mention in the Belper article, as it falls within the town's civil parish. Jellyman (talk) 08:29, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Four months on, and nothing has been done to expand it. That being the case, I'm thinking of going ahead with the merge anyway, with the proviso that of course it can be split off again if enough information is added to warrant it. I'll not do anything just yet, but unless somebody adds something to the article soon, it's getting merged... Jellyman (talk) 18:43, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No progress after six months, so I've gone ahead and merged it. Jellyman (talk) 18:33, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Belper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070717193706/http://www.victoriacross.org.uk/derbyshi.htm to http://www.victoriacross.org.uk/derbyshi.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604225707/http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/TEXstrutt.htm to http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/TEXstrutt.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=9500253
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:04, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I propose to merge Bargate, Derbyshire and Belper Lane End. As with the previous merge of Blackbrook, Derbyshire, these articles are stubs (one unsourced) with little potential and both locations can better covered in the context of the nearby town whose civil parish they are within. Jellyman (talk) 13:31, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose, occupied places which seem sufficiently distant to keep separate. The Belper Lane End article also has 3 independent references. Klbrain (talk) 21:51, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

text: Weak oppose; smaller settlements than these have their own articles, and there is potential for expansion of both. Dave.Dunford (talk) 22:25, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

text: Closing with no merge, given the opposition and no clear support. Klbrain (talk) 07:55, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Bargate, Derbyshire]] and [[Belper Lane End]] 

message: I believe this has been superseded by a Community Rail Partnership 08:00, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Friends of the Derwent Valley Line