lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:White movement people

message: Do we really need this category? We have :Category:Russian nobility for the nobility and :Category:Russian counter-revolution people for the active participants of the White movement.
What is common between a pauper and a friend of Gorky Nina Berberova and the Grand Duchess Olga Alexandrovna of Russia? abakharev 12:53, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand your reservations. The reason I made this category is to show the common connection between people as diverse as a famous French film-maker (Tati) and an acclaimed British actress (Mirren) and the writer of Lolita (Nabokov). When you throw in a Harvard scholar who became a Canadian MP (Ignatieff) and a French prime minister who killed himself (Beregovoy) and finally the biographer of John Maynard Keynes (Skidelsky) - I guess you can understand the curiosity of it all! Until I started researching the modern-day descendants of White Russians, I had no idea about their origins. I did think of giving it a different name, e.g. "People of White Russian emigre origin" or something like that. Perhaps that would be more appropriate? Nonetheless, I feel that the diversity of the people in the category is interesting enough to warrant its existence. Thanks :-) --Peripatetic 20:04, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I still have not get the criteria for the inclusion to the category. Almost everybody (excluding the Bolsheviks themselves) opposed the Bolshevik government. Do they have to actually bear the arms to be included in the list? Can Anarchists be included? Socialist Revolutioners? On the other side, can the Monarchists be included? Members of the Black Hundreds? Do you have to be an ethnical Russian to be included? E.g. is it accidental that Berberova's husband Khodasevich is not included or is it is because he is ethnically Half-Pole-Half-Jew? How about the emigres that returned to the USSR like Aleksei Tolstoy and Kuprin (and Gorky BTW)? If we will include all people who at some stage opposed to Bolsheviks - it would be a really large category indeed. Maybe you wanted something like :Category:Russian Liberals? (that would exclude people left to kadets and right to Octyabrists)? Or maybe :Category:First wave of Russian emigration? abakharev 06:00, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Erm... I'm not Russian! I have only been studying Russian history for a few months because I'm very interested in it.. I haven't put in lots of names, because I only included those names I'm familiar with. It's difficult for me to answer your questions - mainly because I'm not all that familiar with the subject yet and am still learning! But any omissions are not intentional, merely the result of my ignorance. --Peripatetic 06:23, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comments
Wikipedia talk:User RFC reform

message: This straw poll is pointless, since it only proves RFC process to be impopular (which we already knew, see WP:AAP) and does not propose a solution other than vagueness or scrapping it entirely. Please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Enforcement for a constructive proposal that addresses several concerns given in AAP. >Radiant< 13:01, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Enforcement is one issue, but the problems with RFC go beyond this. Incivility, in particular, is a serious concern with many RFCs that I have witnessed. While WP:RFC/E is a proposal that deserves to be seriously considered, this straw poll still serves a useful purpose. <TT>Crotalus horridus <SMALL>(TALK • CONTRIBS)</SMALL></TT> 17:19, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Before RFC come things like mediation cabal and third opinion
After RFC comes advocacy, mediation committee or more mediation cabal
after mediation committee comes arbitration committee.
Please don't overload the arbitration committee, they are already overstressed. Thank you. Kim Bruning 14:12, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  BZZT
Talk:First Army (United States)

message: The Commander of First Army is Lt. Gen Thomas G. Miller.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.255.241.39 (talk) 08:26, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As far as I know, Division West and Division East are the only 2-star commands in the Army that do not have their own wikipedia pages. They fulfill a similar mission, sure, but even their training support brigades have their own pages. Smitherssoft (talk) 16:25, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: See First Army Division East and First Army Division West.--Trilotat (talk) 17:53, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate articles for Divisions

message: I was hoping that the page would have information about exercises, specifically Exercises IROQUOIS HATCHET and MOHAWK ARROW.  I believe they occured between August 1959 and December 1960.  Perkins FC2 (talk) 23:15, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion of exercises in the 1950s
Talk:Satoru Akahori

message: I'm not certain if Akahori-san draws his own manga or not. I just felt he needed to have a wikipage! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyaa the Catlord (talk • contribs) 13:08, Feb 7, 2006 (UTC)
:He doesn't, he's a writer, not an artist. Check out the works list on his website for who did what, but has worked with Rei Omishi, Yukimaru Katsura and lots of others. Also, novel or anime often preceeds manga version. --zippedmartin 23:38, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't go as far as "often", but... thanks for the cleanup. Kyaa the Catlord 09:02, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Television pilots

message: A lot of the shows listed are the first episodes of series, which debuted along with the rest of the initial run and were recorded with them. Is it really accurate to list them as pilots, when the main article focuss on what is effectively a test run? Timrollpickering 13:27, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not all these would be considered "pilots"

message: Over the past months, TV episodes have been redirected by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here . Even if you have not, other opinions are needed because this issue is affecting all TV episodes in Wikipedia. --Maniwar (talk) 16:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Centralized TV Episode Discussion
Talk:1st Maryland Regiment

message: 1st maryland Regiment cannot be a Continental Army Regiment. All Continental Army Regiments follow the same policy that the US Army has continued to this day. The designation "1st Maryland Regiment" indicates a Maryland Army national Guard unit from the period before the national Guard units achieved universal Federal Recognition and were renumbered permanently in the US Army series of numbers.
SSG Cornelius Seon (Retired) 13:42, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The 1st Maryland Regiment was a Continental Army regiment and not a state militia/ National Guard unit. This regiment was not given a Continental # like the regiments from New England but still served in the Continental Army and not the Maryland militia. Marc29th 19:29, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

text: This regiment was raised by the state of Maryland and it then joined the continental army as part of the Maryland Line. Each state had a quota of regiments it needed to provide for service with the continental army. The number would change as the needs of the continental army changed each year of the war.  The Militia regiment were commanded by the states themselves and only fought with the Continental Army as the State themselves saw fit. George Washington could not command these militia regiments unless the states agreed to it. But the 1st Maryland regiment was always under his control. I hope I've explaned a little better the system during the Rev. War. Marc29th 19:44, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a Continental Army Regiment
Talk:Flag of Trinidad and Tobago

message: Does Tobago have a flag of its own? //Big Adamsky 13:44, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  Guettarda 14:32, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tobago

message: Never heard of any "Mount Prothero" with any TT connection - that statement needs a source.  Guettarda 19:41, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can find a reference to a Mr. Prothero there, but not to a Mt. Prothero.  But I might be missing something.  Guettarda 23:47, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

text: You are absolutely correct. I am a fool. :) Smuj 16:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mount Prothero 

message: Image:Flag of Trinidad and Tobago (1889–1958).svg|Colonial flag of Trinidad and Tobago (1889-1962) Gif version
Image:Flag of Trinidad and Tobago (1889–1958).svg|Colonial flag of Trinidad and Tobago (1889-1962) SVG version
Can we please replace this old template of the colonial flag for a new model of a Wikimedia version of this flag which would be much more detailed. (2A02:C7F:5621:2A00:9016:58B9:E174:C643 (talk) 09:32, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: A vector version of the flag is now available. Sodacan (talk) 15:31, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Create new svg  colonial flag  
Talk:Look-ahead (backtracking)

message: # randomness should be expanded; using it only to break ties is quite trivial application - Liberatore(T) 13:48, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To do

message: What are the images supposed to show? Someone (possibly the author) should add a description. Is it a "all_distinct" problem? Now it just shows bunch of lines and really nothing understandable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.251.48.140 (talk) 02:14, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: The phrase "A look-ahead technique that may be more time-consuming but may produce better results is..." has been on this page for over a decade, But...
I don't think that is accurate. One is either trying to find all the consistent answers, or the first one - but in either case there is a mathematically defined result. A result cannot be better or worse. (In case of all results, these are mathematically determined. In case of first result, any ranking is entirely external to the CSP definition and one can't rank algorithms without further discussions of goals.) All algorithms that terminate find elements of the mathematically define result set, only those or else exactly all of those. The computation time CAN be better or worse.
A better choice might be:
     A look-ahead technique that may be more time-consuming in each node searched, but may require fewer overall consistency checks is based on arc consistency.
Also here is a link on the missing citation, from Artificial Intelligence, A Modern Approach. Can track a usable cictation from this I am sure:  http://aima.cs.berkeley.edu/newchap05.pdf     Dechter (2003) Page 137 discusses the existence of "min-conflicts" but does not show efficiency results.
Csp-interest (talk) 17:19, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed my stance on my comment above. My technical points are correct about the way the final result set is the same no matter what the look-ahead technique. But the improvement in the search algorithm is correctly described in that the different look-ahead techniques produce "better results" in terms of the efficiency of the calculation, that is "results" refers to the improvement in efficiency. Another meaning of "better results" is a reduction in candidates that is a smaller set (though in the end only fully consistent candidates will remain). Therefore I withdraw my reccomendation. Csp-interest (talk) 12:58, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording
Talk:Moffitt Royal Commission

message: The article has been moved from Royal Commission of Inquiry in respect of certain matters relating to allegations of organised crime in club to this. Felixboy 17:57, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The formal name is the "Royal Commission of Inquiry in respect of certain matters relating to allegations of organised crime in clubs" and the "Moffitt Royal Commission" is the colloquial name. The standard is to call them by their formal name and mention the colloquial name. Gusfriend (talk) 23:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: There have recently been several changes to the Organised Crime categories without any consensus for the change.  This has apparently been initiated by one editor's decision to nominate an existing category for deletion.
Instead of simply reverting edits and becoming embroiled in an edit war, I encourage all interested parties to comment at The Cat for deletion page.
Cheers,  This flag once was red  22:09, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Organized (sic) Crime
Talk:List of AMD graphics processing units

message: Since AMD GPU architectures have numbers to represent their instruction sets used in various domains, it would be great to have them in the various tables of this page. See for example https://llvm.org/docs/AMDGPUUsage.html to have an idea.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rkeryell (talk • contribs) 13:03, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to add also the GFX numbers 

message: I believe the Radeon 620 and 625 are GCN 3rd gen (TSMC 28nm) and not 4th gen (GF 14FF). Also it would be nice to add missing codenames.
Since 600 series is single table (desktop & laptop), maybe additional footnote (for 630 and RX 640) could be added.
At AMD radeon-630 radeon-rx-640 are listed as discrete and mobile.
Based on videocardz there are 10 GPUs in total (3 discrete, 7 mobile), same names but different SP.
I'm still experimenting with templates, not confident enough to edit, so i gonna leave this here (maybe someone else can edit it).
Rando717 (talk) 23:19, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radeon 600 series (architecture, codenames, dGPUs) 

message: Looking online on sites like GPUZoo, TechPowerUp, UltimateRetro, VGAMuseum, ...etc
There appears to be more from IGP 3xx series (chipset integrated). Stuff i found so far have multiple names/codenames like:
IGP 320/320M (RS100/A3/U1/Cabo) - Oct 5th, 2002
IGP 330/330M (RS200/RS200L/Wilma) - May 1st, 2002
IGP 340/340M (RS200/RS200M/Wilma) - Oct 5th, 2002
IGP 345M (RS200/RS200M+/Wilma) - Oct 5th, 2002
IGP 350M (RS200 revB/RS200M revB/Wilma) - Oct 5th, 2002
IGP 380 (RS380) - this one could be 'Radeon X600 Pro' related, and not IGP 380?
...anyway can't see any 3xxM mentions on article (or 345M/350M), so I gonna leave this here (in case it helps someone).Rando717 (talk) 05:52, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  IGP (3xx series) ...only 3 GPUs? 

message: This page nearly crashed Chrome on my phone (Pixel  5a). Would it be worth the undertaking to mitigate that e.g. split into separate pages? 217.180.201.169 (talk) 00:01, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page too big? 

message: Recently, Mesa added a series of patches to improve support for TerraScale GPUs (again).  They now support OpenGL 4.5 and OpenGL ES 3.1. Referance: https://mesamatrix.net/ as of posting ----24.208.189.58 (talk) 21:34, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better Mesa Support for older chipsets. 

message: I would like to remove Graphic output ports column from all Radeon Pro products, to reduce table width.
Any opinions or objections? Rando717 (talk) 19:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graphic output ports column 

message: GCN 5th gen cards is listed with 1.3 support https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radeon_RX_Vega_series
GCN 4th gen cards (which in this very article are just listed with 1.2 support) are listed here with 1.3 support! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radeon_400_series Tuxayo (talk) 21:55, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does "1.3 possible" means for Vulkan support?
Talk:Little wattlebird

message: According to Sibley-Monroe checklist 12:
*Anthochaera lunulata Little Wattlebird
*Anthochaera chrysoptera Brush Wattlebird
We should check this... bogdan 14:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Species

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Anthochaera chrysoptera.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 5, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-05-05. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 21:35, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Anthochaera chrysoptera.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Anthochaera chrysoptera 4.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 28, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-05-28. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:16, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Anthochaera chrysoptera 4.jpg]] to appear as POTD
Talk:Derfel Cadarn (Warlord Chronicles)

message: == Stuff about basis of character ==
It's interesting to speculate about whom Cornwell may have based the character on, but has anyone actually published this analysis or is it something we're just thinking up ourselves? Reverse Gear 04:28, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: It's interesting to speculate about whom Cornwell may have based the character on, but has anyone actually published this analysis or is it something we're just thinking up ourselves? Reverse Gear 04:28, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stuff about basis of character
Talk:Jiří Grygar

message: The book "Okna vesmiru dokoran" (in Czech trnscription) from Jiri Grygar/Vladimir Zelezny (that Zelezny), Nase Vojsko 1989, ISBM 80-206-0126-0, has foreword with following info:
* In 1979 Grygar and Zelezny started with series of articles for "Technicky Magazin" (Tecko). The name was choosen here.
* Due to its success Bratislava section of CSTV created TV series based on the articles. In 1981-82 first 6 episodes were aired. 
* Even bigger success resulted in 25+ episodes aired (and the mentioned book printed)
HTH Pavel Vozenilek 14:04, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of "Okna vesmiru dokoran" name 

message: Are Close binaries the same thing as Contact binaries ??
JanSuchy 19:07, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Close binaries vs. Contact binaries 

message: The link leads to an asteroid, but the Vesmír in question is a scientific magazine. http://www.vesmir.cz/ 37.188.226.161 (talk) 10:52, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect link to Vesmír
Talk:White-naped tit

message: Wikispecies says that its scientific name is Parus leucomelas. bogdan 14:11, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The other name for this species is also White-naped Tit, maybe there is some confusion due to the common names. Shyamal 10:04, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:María Isabel

message: This article must not be deleted - María Isabel is famous in Europe, she won a festival, and she has 2 albums and some singles. Also, there are many other articles with famous childs.--Daniel bg 14:15, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep it 

message: It says here she was born on January 4, but she is listed as a birth under the article for July 4. Vyroglyph 06:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: She is born in January 4th. Source : Valemusic. Also Capricornio (her third album title) is the zodiacal sign of birth of Maria Isabel, from december 21st to january 20th.   
L'Espagnol on monday december 18th 2006.
ola maria isabel me das tu messenger a tengo facebook me llamo isabel baldovinos prospers ok me gustaaas tus canciones a i contestame porfavor tengo 10 años ok  dew  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.34.244.209 (talk) 21:31, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age discrepancy? 
Talk:Anti-Japanese Riots

message: This is obviously an important and encyclopedic topic, and this article should certainly be expanded (assuming it hasn't already been written under a different name, which may well be; but if it has I couldn't find the article). It has two problems, though: one is the lack of sources, and the other is an unclear title. There have been anti-Japanese riots at other times and in other places, and I don't think one article should cover them all. If these particular riots aren't known by another name, I suggest moving this article to something like Chinese anti-Japanese riots in 2005, which I believe is a fairly reasonable description of events. - squibix(talk) 14:17, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Gary Usher

message: I´m afraid, some of this songwriting credits are wrong... --81.223.57.242 14:23, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: songwriting credits

message: I put up these images under GFDL.  Mdoc7 02:55, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: That reference seems to come out of nowhere. PapayaSF (talk) 21:24, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, so I removed it.  --hulmem (talk) 02:12, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "His religious duties"? 

message: This seems like a "stub" article though it is not tagged as such.  Certainly there is more interesting stuff about him in other articles like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagittarius_(band) & https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr._Byrds_%26_Mr._Hyde
There is also the story about how he tried to document the process of working with Brian Wilson & Eugene Landy in "The Wilson Project" http://beachboysopinion.blogspot.com/2013/09/review-wilson-project-2013-edition.html
::Blogs are not generally accepted as sources although there are exceptions. Wikipedia itself is not a source for citing another Wikipedia article.THX1136 (talk) 01:14, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seems Very Thin 

message: Not knowing what Gary Usher looks like, the caption on the picture really doesn't help to identify him. I may dig around to see if I can find a properly captioned version of the photo so it can have a more helpful caption than the current one. 00:12, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a captioned photo of the Hondells that was provided by Wayne Edwards at jerryreuss.com/thehondells-littlehonda.html. It identifies the gentleman who looks similar to Usher as Dick Burns. I removed the photo from the article until a better photo of Usher can be located for use. 00:42, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which one's Pink?
Talk:Cimon

message: it says that the Long Walls "surrounded Athens". Wouldn't it be more correct to say something like "stood along the road connecting Athens with her port Piraeus?" idiotoff 05:32, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  the Long Walls 

message: Cimon was known to have male lovers.  That should be in the article too.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.181.232.159 (talk) 16:47, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Male lovers 

message: Some old edits that used to be at the title "Cimon" can now be found at Talk:Cimon/Old edits. Graham87 05:46, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some old edits 

message: There's more at the EB9 article on "Greece" and the EB11 article on Cimon, which—while sometimes biased—can be used to expand the article or support various factual points that are still uncited. The following
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
may be very well and good but (a) we shouldn't be hawking particular editions of classic texts without good, noted reason and (b) the rest need some context or use in the article to make them more useful than a "Kimon"/"Cimon" search at Google Books. Kindly restore them as they are used to verify inline points or once they have been glossed (ideally in a historiography or legacy section) to explain their bias/importance to the scholarship on Kimon. — LlywelynII 06:33, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for future article expansion