lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:War in Abkhazia (1998)

message: I've hidden this. What was it supposed to mean? Alæxis¿question? 07:07, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: no idea. I've copied it from Gali district, I think --TheFEARgod (Ч) 11:31, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks, there was indeed a mistake there. Alæxis¿question? 13:50, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: can we call a conflict of this scale a war? I suggest something more moderate as "Gali uprising (1998)" instead... - Alsandro · T · w:ka: Th · T 20:33, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Georgians already call it Six-Day War. That's one source for that, at least --TheFEARgod (Ч) 12:55, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: question

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Nick-D (talk) 04:15, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: User:Jixvi, you keep introducing vastly inflated casualty counts into the article without providing any new sources, reverting my reverts to the previous un-inflated version. The existing source supports the non-inflated numbers. Please defend the numbers you are introducing or I will restore the previous figures. Also, please take a second to read WP:WAR to avoid the behavior mentioned there and to follow WP:BRD. Achemish (talk) 17:56, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute for numbers in casualties section
Talk:Stoic categories

message: Let it be known that almost everything I know about the subject comes from Stephen Menn's excellent article: Stephen Menn, "The Stoic Theory of Categories," in Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy: Volume XVII: 1999, (Oxford, Oxford University Press) , pp.215-47.  As for anything else...  I probably have it all wrong.  --Sophroniscus 21:21, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a basic summary of the Categories (maybe too basic, I'm not sure), to complement your excellent background material. I did though remove the final Augustine quote - it seemed a bit out-of-place to me in a technical discussion of philosophical Categories. Singinglemon (talk) 21:34, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I plead ignorance...
Talk:Repton Prep

message: Good start. Seperated from Foremark Hall which was a good idea. Victuallers 21:29, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's often hard to get reliable sources for prep-school articles. In this case I feel the article is under-sourced and full of WP:OR. If good quality sources cannot be found I'd be in favour of a merger with Repton School. --Salimfadhley (talk) 20:24, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess
Talk:NetShops

message: Perhaps use information from the following for the article:
*  * Omaha World-Herald. March 14, 2006. Online firm NetShops seeks 150 new workers. Deborah Alexander *  * Omaha World-Herald. November 18, 2006. Omaha-based online retailer acquires optics Web sites. Virgil Larson *  *  * Duluth News Tribune. November 30, 2006. Netshops reaps big profits from cyber Monday sales. Section: Business; Page C9. *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * Omaha World-Herald. (June 26, 2007) Google course clicks at Metro Matthew Hansen. *  * Google Web Search Is A Game-Changer In Advertising Field -- Jreferee   t/c 21:31, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Material for article

message: Wow, I can see why they want to delete this article.  Just look at the history and you can see the failure of Wikipedia.  Loads of people add some fact to the article.  The executives at the company get scared and delete the fact.  People add it back claiming that an encyclopedia can't choose which truths to print and which to omit and still be objective.  The execs assign minions to monitor the page and remove anything that makes the company look bad.
Well, sometimes the truth does make things look bad.  That doesn't mean it's not objective or truthful.  If Wikipedia was around in 1936, all references to the Holocaust would be deleted as NPV or not encyclopedic.  The fundamental problem with Wikipedia is that as soon as it became popular, governments and companies started using it for marketing and propaganda.  Since governments and companies have far more resources than individuals and can hire people to "manage" articles 24/7, articles always end up being a white wash version of history that makes the people in power look good.  Sure, there's always a history of an article (until it gets "deleted"), but we all know that the most recent version is the only one that counts because 99% of the time people don't look through the history.
This is a fundamental problem with Wikipedia, and I'm sure the entire web community would like to hear what, if anything, Wikipedia can do to stop this problem.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.108.139.201 (talk) 05:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion Thread
Talk:2001 Kodori crisis

message: In 2001 Abkhazia held and defended their control over Kodori gorge (described in this article).
In 2006 the Georgia (country) took control of it from Emzar Kvitsiani in the 2006 Kodori crisis.
In 2008, Abkhazia took it back in the 2008 South Ossetia war.
What happened between 2001 and 2006? When and how did Kodori fall to Kvitsiani? Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 04:39, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The 2001 clashes occurred in the lower Kodori. The upper part had never been under the separatist control before the August 2008 Russian onslaught. --KoberTalk 06:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What Kober said. sephia karta | di mi 13:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about the chronology of Events

message: this source could be used to expand the article. Offliner (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A good source 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1341916.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Mkativerata (talk) 01:39, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:2007 Polish parliamentary election

message: There is an estimate that there is at least 1,000,000 Poles living in the United Kingdom, prompting some political parties, notably the opposition to campaign over here in the UK. If this article gets expanded, it might be worth adding a section on this, as it is fairly unique, not so much in the fact that it exists, but that it happened so quickly in Poland's case down to EU employment and immigration laws. Mikebloke 16:44, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foreign Campaigning 

message: Why is Sosnowiec so loyal to the SLD? Intelligent Mr Toad (talk) 13:44, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: SLD
Talk:The Real World: Hollywood

message: Is that column necessary? No other article has that and it could easily be included in the biography? I don't see why we couldn't put "RW/RR Challenges Won" but could put that. Wikiguy09 (talk) 07:18, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah that's probably a holdover from before we solidly worked out the Table we now use consistently. Go ahead and incorporate it into the bios. I think those occupations come from the vevmo source, but that should be double-checked. Thanks for pointing that out. Nightscream (talk) 02:21, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ocupation

message: Add to External Links: William Gilbert's DJ Page. It is https://djwillgill.com Bouncecouncil (talk) 00:02, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: per WP:ELNO. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 03:03, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 April 2020
Talk:List of Blue Heelers episodes

message: This article is the 66th longest article in the entire english wikipedia. I propose splitting the article into List of Blue Heelers episodes (1994-2000) and List of Blue Heelers episodes (2000-2006). The split would be even, and the articles would be manageable. Thoughts? ZZ  Claims ~ Evidence  20:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Length 

message: A split has been proposed regarding this article. Discussion is now taking place at Talk:Blue Heelers#Blue Heelers split proposal.
Daniel99091 (talk) 02:27, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As a side note, it has now been split in case one was wondering :) AnmaFinotera (talk) 14:51, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blue Heelers split proposal 

message: This list just appeared on :Category:Pages with DEFAULTSORT conflicts.  The conflict is the least of its problems.  Whoever was compiling the individual years and cavalierly linking them here did not notice or did not care that the boxes go to pieces somewhere around the third or fourth year.  Someone should fix everything, including unlinking the components and copying them in instead but that someone is not I.  JimCubb (talk) 00:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Will Not Fix It 

message: Seasons and Episodes are different on Prime Video, as Prime uses a date that viewing was available outside Australia.  The Date is often in the next calendar year, so (for example) episodes of Season 7 (by Australian Air Date)  are season 8 in Prime.  The season do not necessarily start and end  on the same episode as was seen when aired in Australia, (as seen in You Tube)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cassie4freedom (talk • contribs) 14:55, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blue Heelers on Prime Video
Talk:Ederlezi (song)

message: Who is claiming now ? St. Georges day is a bit older than Islam itself... First there was St. Georges Day -then there was Islam, so Hederlezi is a variation of St. George..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.132.248.116 (talk) 17:42, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

message: The article said that Bregović wrote the lyrics based on a song sung by concentration camp prisoners. The literature and Bregović himself state the contrary, that the song was inspired by a love song written by his fellow songwriter several years ago, and that he also added a couple of verses from an Albanian folk song, and Bregović has been very explicit about that in his interviews. Previous references were the lowest of local sensationalist tabloid press, that deal with local scandals, celebrity affairs, UFO encounters, pseudo-history etc. and cannot be taken as a reference because they offer only hearsay data Bregović himself denied. I also put the passage after Kusturica's film mention, because Bregović released Đurđevdan after it. 77.46.186.244 (talk) 18:03, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: My edits about Bregović and Đurđevdan

message: I have seen a Kurdish version on youtube. Anyone have copy of lyrics? --2001:700:700:8:6E3B:E5FF:FE22:D3E0 (talk) 17:11, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kurdish? 

message: I've found this performance by Muharem Serbezovski https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCXNZva33QU
The lyrics don't seem to be the ones listed here. Anyone know what this version is called? And could someone please add these lyrics too? --Ministar Nesigurnosti (talk) 17:43, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This site says that Serbezovski published this song in 1990. Its after Bijelo Dugme published it in 1988 and probably is just one of the versions. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 18:20, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Makes sense, thank you alot. --Ministar Nesigurnosti (talk) 03:32, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You are welcome. And thank you for pointing to Serbezovski. Its always nice to hear his songs. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 07:21, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different version?
Talk:Sa'idi people

message: Is there a reason why only the lightest possible Upper Egyptians were chosen for this ethnic group? There are also Upper Egyptians who quite dark(especially farmers and other peasants) that are not represented here. The picture as it stands doesn't show the true diverseness of Upper Egyptians.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.92.240.98 (talk) 17:27, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I second this criticism. Many Upper Egyptians, from Asyut to Aswan, have more African features than the group depicted. Moreover, many of those depicted are not Sa'idi at all, but half-Sa'idi (or ). I'm going to change the picture when I get a chance. Steeletrap (talk) 21:17, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Doesn't show full diverseness of Upper Egyptians

message: Isn't this the same as the maqsum iqa'? Badagnani (talk) 21:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Maqsum

message: Why does the page title, "Sa'idi", use an apostrophe instead of a back (left) quote?
The Arabic letters shown (صعيد) have an `ayn for the second consonant, and `ayn is normally transliterated with a back (left) quote / grave accent / "modifier letter left half ring" (see page Ayin, which says "Less precise transcriptions may use an apostrophe, failing to distinguish the ayin from the glottal stop consonant hamza.")
I'm not an Arabic expert so somebody please correct if I'm mistaken. Maybe Sa'idi (with apostrophe) is the historically established way of writing the word in English?
Huttarl (talk) 17:31, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why an apostrophe in page title?
Template talk:Gnutella

message: I am not sure if the magnet sights are warranted.  Especially as LimeWire discards SHA1 searches, so only exact source magnet links are usable.  The magnet URI are a technology.  Some of the technology links are really terminology.  I found these links interesting Ethics of file sharing, Privacy of the Gnutella Protocol, Privacy in file sharing networks, Media Defender, MediaSentry, Anti-copyright and Peer-to-peer#Attacks_on_peer-to-peer_networks.  Feel free to edit this template.  Bpringlemeir 22:02, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I created a separate terminology heading after Thumperward removed the magnet category. Bpringlemeir 04:13, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headings 

message: The intent is to give a flavor of gnutella clients.  I don't think that an exhaustive list should be put in the navbox.  I have culled the list by only including original software.  Ie, gnutella clients that aren't a fork (or are the only actively maintained version).  The software link for the group heading was more obvious originally (but looked ugly).  I concur with User:Thumperward to keep the list in alpha order. Bpringlemeir (talk) 00:57, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also now wonder if ultra-peer capable software should be listed  seperately.  This software forms the back-bone of the Gnutella network.  I would be for a way of differentiating the ultra-capable nodes from those that are not in this template. Bpringlemeir (talk) 04:03, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  There aren't so many servent links that we need to separate them out, and to my knowledge all the mainstream servents have ultrapeer capability these days anyway. Chris Cunningham (talk) 08:56, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Software
Talk:Fabaceae/to do

message: *Write more on the biological form
*Find examples of non legume producing Fabaceae (Alysicarpus vaginalis, depicted in the picture on that page, has a dehiscing loment instead of a legume, according to Zomlefer 1994. You can see the fruits in the large version of the image. --Clickie 08:38, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society

message: "Open Access" is a bit misleading - I wanted to get "Nicolai Ivanovitch Vavilov. 1885-1942 Obit. Not. Fell. R. Soc. November 1, 1954 9 1 259-264", but got "This item requires a subscription to Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society." 101.117.106.195 (talk) 02:33, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ford Zetec engine

message: The reference isn't wrong. A FOE engineer even came forward, anonymously of course, some time ago with details of the Rocam program only an insider would know...including the fact that Rocam is based on Kent. (many of the items he gave to indicate a Kent basis were genuinely just common sense things we should have recognized anyway) Unfortunately this isn't supposed to be enough for Wiki inclusion for obvious reasons, fortunately we have no credible original source stating that this is Zetec or Sigma based either so it apparently has slid by the watchdogs likely because it hasn't been challenged much. (my hat is off to the fella smart enough to include it in the first place) So please, don't rock the boat. This is one of the few automotive issues on Wikipedia which isn't so inaccurate it's laughable. Syr74 (talk) 14:55, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: These sections of the Ford Kent and Ford Zetec articles are almost identical, so should be merged into one:
Ford_Kent_engine#Zetec_RoCam
Ford_Zetec_engine#Zetec_Rocam_.28duratec_8v.29
Does this need a vote? John a s (talk) 16:20, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zetec RoCam merge 
Talk:Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike

message: I propose that this article be renamed, as per the government website at . This now bears the name, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike. Imc 22:16, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved. There was an irrelevant move by a user stating that the website still bears the name "Bangalore". Well as per the official website, the name clearly bears "Bengaluru". Given that BBMP is an organization, it should be as per the current title. — LeoFrank  Talk 10:20, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  It wasn't an "irrelevant move", it was a move to the name still used by BBMP themselves at that time. When the move was made the English language version of the site still carried a banner saying "Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike", switching to "Bengaluru" as recently as a few weeks ago (relevant diffs: , ). So I suggest you check things before criticising the actions of other editors. Thomas.W  talk 11:18, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: @Thomas.W: Well that's pretty weird given that the organization was renamed to "Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike" for over 8 years and its website also reflected the same since then. There was only a redesign of the website UI recently. I notice that you are in general against the name "Bengaluru" appearing in any article. — LeoFrank  Talk 15:25, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  It might be pretty weird to you, but having until recently had a banner on their English web site saying Bangalore and not Bengaluru is a fact. As apparently noted by the admin who made the requested move, who wouldn't have made the move without checking the links I provided. And claiming that I'm "in general" against the name "Bengaluru" is plain silly, I just go by what WP:COMMONNAME says, and would be equally much against moving Copenhagen to "København", because this is, after all, the English language Wikipedia. Thomas.W  talk 15:45, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed rename
Talk:Acta Zoologica

message: This article is the default for links pointing to "Acta Zoologica", as that was the name of this journal from 1922 to 2002.  No other journal is or has been named just Acta Zoologica.  Other journals, incorporating the term "Acta Zoologica" in their title, are listed on the Acta Zoologica (disambiguation) page.  A hatnote has been placed at the top of this article to alert readers to the existence of that disambiguation page and the journals that are listed there. --Bejnar (talk) 22:57, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Acta Zoologica primary

message: After this article was moved a few weeks ago, I posted the below comments on the talk page of Stemonitis, but did not yet get a response. Perhaps other editors here have more information? --Randykitty (talk) 08:49, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: *Did you have time to look into this? Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 08:45, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: *I think I have discovered the problem: take a look at this. --- Steve Quinn (talk) 13:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind. That link is not really helpful. The publisher produces material from Wikipedia and Public Domain sources. So, in essence, this is a mirror publication. In any case, I am finding no evidence for this as the name of the journal. I reccomend moving it back to the correct titile that is listed on the Wiley-Blackwell site, the Library of Congress catalog entry, the World Cat entry, Hollis Classic - Harvard Library, the Boston University Libraries, and so on...Steve Quinn (talk) 13:42, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm thinking about that, too, but would like to hear from the editor who performed this move first to see why they did this. There might be something we're missing... --Randykitty (talk) 13:43, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. Are you aware that this apparent mistake occured way back in 2009? Also, even the source cited, CNAH, lists this journal as "Acta Zoologica" - "Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences and Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters - Published regularly since 1920..." ---Steve Quinn (talk) 13:56, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Journal name
Talk:Shirō Asano

message: ----
This is now a disambiguation page.
The page Shiro Asano redirects here.  Most people searching are unlikely to type "Shirō Asano" and more likely to type "Shiro Asano".  The correct transliteration includes the accent thingy, therefore it is better that the disambig page reflects this.  simonthebold 08:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC)