Talk:Air force history of Iran

message: The allies didn't invade Iran for its neutrality but for leaning towards the axis powers despite its decleration of neutrality. I have made the necessary changes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sennaista (talk • contribs) 20:46, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Iranian nuetrality in WW2

message: I ended up here from the random Page link and it jumps out to me that IRIAF isn't defined where it is used in the first sentence. Perhaps it should be obvious but I don't know what it means, perhaps someone could correct this so that the article is readable by people with all levels of familiarity with the subject. Thanks. Stardust8212 23:48, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  IRIAF? 

message: The article title should be Imperial Iranian Air Force. Atashparast 02:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: :Image:Iiaflogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 21:21, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Iiaflogo.gif

message: Didn't I read somewhere the IIAF's F-14s were "allegedly" sabotaged by Grumman engineers as they fled Iran during the 1979 Iranian Revolution? —xanderer (talk) 21:46, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  F-14s Sabotaged? 

message: I took out the logo because of it's size interfering with the other photos in the article. See the previous versions for examples. Articseahorse (talk) 13:38, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If we can make it smaller and find a better place that would be good.  but  But I do not know how to do that.
(Articseahorse (talk) 01:30, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

text: If you can do that I would say go for it. I am not good enough to make those adjustment. 
Articseahorse (talk) 00:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo removed.  

message: In the section titled "Imperial era", there is information about Iranian F-14 Tomcats after, the 1979 Iranian revolution. It is the following:
Although after the 1979 Iranian revolution, some of these planes were not in working order due to a lack of necessary spare parts, because of an American arms embargo and damage sustained on the aircraft during the Iraqi invasion (Iran–Iraq War). Some were brought back in to service, due to localised production of reverse-engineered, Iranian-made, spare parts as well as "cannibalism" (the process of taking working parts from damaged aircraft and using them to repair others).
Considering that this is about the Tomcats in the time after, the 1979 revolution; in other words, the Islamic Republic of Iran: it would make more sense to move that information down to, the section titled "Post-Islamic Revolution". The wording of, the first part of the sentence would have to be slightly modified, in order to do this. --Dreddmoto (talk) 12:57, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imperial era 

message: For some unexplained reason the title of this article was changed to History of Iranian military aviation. This is misleading because it would give the impression to unfamiliar readers that the air force of Iran is the only form of military aviation in that country. That is clearly not the case considering the existence of the Islamic Republic of Iran Army Aviation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Republic_of_Iran_Army_Aviation , the Islamic Republic of Iran Navy Aviation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Republic_of_Iran_Navy_Aviation and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Aerospace Force https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Revolutionary_Guard_Corps_Aerospace_Force
It would be more logical to change the title to reflect that. I suggest a change to Air force history of Iran. Views of others would be welcome. Dreddmoto (talk) 15:38, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of the article