lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sharon Sheeley

message: If Sheeley was the first writer of a number-one hit for the Billboard 100, then isn't she the youngest person of any gender to write one, rather than specifying her as the youngest "woman" to do this? I am confused by the wording in that paragraph; hope someone who has the original source info (not cited in any References list) will clarify eventually. Bebop 13:31, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I would have expected to see a picture with Eddie Cochran, she was always remembered as his girlfriend...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:D4:7F02:25E6:9442:93CB:30B9:1104 (talk) 01:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture with Ricky Nelson
Talk:Arden Anglican School

message: Main priority is more topics/text and gathering references to defend claims. Alumni list is a good idea. History? Photos? Victuallers 16:38, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Schools Assessment

message: 3 Hectares? These campuses are very small are you sure three hectares.--Rob 05:06, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area 

message: wanna edit it and fix some issues
Anonymousonwiki2300 (talk) 08:56, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not the right page to request additional user rights.The reason this page is semi-protected is because of your previous vandaliam.If you want to suggest a sensible change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request. - Arjayay (talk) 09:36, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 21 July 2015 
Talk:Act of Settlement 1657

message: On re-reading the Journal, the grant of £1500 to the Lord Deputy is not part of the Act, so I've removed it.  
* That Lands of Inheritance, of the clear yearly Value of Fifteen hundred Pounds of the forfeited Lands in Ireland, as they were in the Year One thousand Six hundred and Forty, be settled on the Lord Deputy of Ireland, and his Heirs, as a Reward of his many faithful and great Services for this Commonwealth, and as a Testimony, of the great Respects of the Parliament unto him; and that a Bill be brought in to that Purpose. ( From: 'House of Commons Journal Volume 7: 8 June 1657', Journal of the House of Commons: volume 7: 1651-1660 (1802), pp. 549-51. URL: )  
It ties up with the mention of the same amount in the Henry Cromwell article.--Red King 13:34, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Grant of £1,500 a year
Talk:Shen Xue

message: This article should be titled "Shen Xue", as "Shen" is the family name. According to Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_%28Chinese%29, we should use the Chinese method of naming, which is to put the family name first. Fang Aili 13:34, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Ashfield Boys High School

message: Please see the discussion at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board#Ashfield Boys High School. WWGB (talk) 11:14, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title
Talk:Zhao Hongbo

message: This article should be titled "Zhao Hongbo", as "Zhao" is the family name. According to the Wiki Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_%28Chinese%29, we should use the Chinese method of naming, which is to put the family name first. Fang Aili 13:36, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree--V7ndotcom elursrebmem 11:40, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Asquith-Garvey District School Area Board

message: Redirected this page to Rainbow_District_School_Board#Amalgamation_of_Asquith-Garvey_District_School_Area_Board as the Asquith-Garvey District School Area Board was amalgamated into the Rainbow board for the 2009–2010 school year.--papageno (talk) 16:41, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amalgamation into Rainbow District School Board
Talk:Athens College

message: I am removing the NPOV from the top of the page. If you would like it to stay, please state on this discussion page, more specifically what you consider to be non-NPOV in the article and lets discuss it. Lorangriel 15:48, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Untitled section) 

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 23:54, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag 
Talk:James Miller (general)

message: The box at the bottom said he served as Gov. until 1825 (which jives with the article on his successor), but the text said "1819 to 1824". I changed the text to 1825, since that seemed right from the other two dates. If I'm wrong, please change it back, but also change the box at the bottom (the Ark. Gov. template) and, if necessary, change his successor's page (unless, of course, there indeed was a gap between the two). Jeff Worthington 13:49, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Years of service as Governor
Talk:Aaahh!!! Real Monsters

message: The artical is mostly okay, content-wise, but the 1st paragraph and the infobox contain information about something called, "8 Out Of 10 Cats Does Rory Little 124". 67.246.43.229 (talk) 12:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mismatched information in 1st Paragraph and Infobox 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 21:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Druids (film)

message: This movie is really, insanely bad. Don't bother watching the film to glean information for a more complete encyclopedia entry. Seriously. Don't watch it. Don't. Watch. It. Do not. If you choose not to heed my advice... well, God help you. Zanturaeon 14:08, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
"par-attractive women" - what on earth does that mean? --Ossipewsk (talk) 03:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gerald Johanssen

message: Jerald says "baruch, atah, Adonai" in the Hey Arnold movie, the Jewish phrase for "blessed are you, the Lord our God." Does that make him Jewish? --Wack'd About Wiki 14:16, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I believe you may have Gerald confused with the similar-sounding Hey Arnold! character Harold.  Harold is the fictional Jewish character.  Oy vey! ProfessorPaul 02:53, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I believe you may be confused

message: The page currently says "At times he is shown to apparently have a crush on Phoebe, Helga's best friend, feelings which she also seems to return. This is first evidenced in episode "Wheezin' Ed"." But in the earlier episode "Operation Ruthless" the two of them ride the tunnel of love together and act very flirty making this the first episode it was evidenced in.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.66.8.174 (talk) 21:41, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Phoebe
Talk:Ernie Roth

message: I don't know or care about Roth's bio, but he was always was a big plus to a wrestling show. I remember one occasion when Roth blew his nose on Vince McMahon's tie, as funny as anything I've seen on TV. He would also run into the ring when his wrestler had won, and distract the ref while his wrestler continued to violate the "Human Rights" of the hapless opponent. He was a part of pro-wrestling when pro-wrestling was fun, not hype.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2D80:882A:0:8C1F:6128:CB8D:9036 (talk) 23:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tribute to Ross
Talk:Chabad (disambiguation)

message: Re this claim: "Entries should nearly always be sentence fragments, with no final punctuation (commas, full-stops, semicolons, etc.)." Piped links are acceptable in the description, not in the entry link. Entries are bullet-listed. I have no idea what being organisations has to do with the style guidelines. Please see WP:MOSDAB. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:23, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: BTW, Abtract was observing WP:BRD when he didn't revert your changes. BRD goes on to say "BRD is not an excuse for reverting any change more than once." -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:54, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok, I missed the line about the periods (I searched for "period", not "full-stop"). About this specific piped link: itis the best way of refering to that article. They are organisations afilliated with Chabad, and are usefull links on this page, since anybody who came here is likely to have had these in mind or at least be interested in them as well, but they are not by themselves called "Chabad", and should not be represented as such. Abtract and you are appearently not familiar with the Chabad movement and its affiliated organisations, and you might have consulted others before making wholescale changes. Debresser (talk) 04:12, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Or, he could make a bold edit and we could work together to improve the page, which has worked as well. As for the piped link, in that case, a link to the redirect is preferred. -- JHunterJ (talk) 10:57, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think we worked it out. I'm not completely happy, but ok. Debresser (talk) 20:58, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Because this page leads to Kapust and Strashelye, Chabad offshoot groups, I've added the other groups, Niezhin, Liadi, and Avrutch.I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 04:30, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I personally think we should swap all groups for one link to the offshoot page. But User:Debresser insists that would be "reinventing the wheel", and that we should first reach a concensus on subject. I have deferred to him due to his experience in this area. So, shall we change the individual links to one general one? I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 04:35, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Since these groups are all Chabad, I think they should be here. It would seem logical to add the link to Chabad offshoot groups as an intro to the list of specific groups. After all, they each have their own article, and should therefore be represented on this disambiguation page. Debresser (talk) 07:54, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Consistency
Talk:Jack Hobbs (footballer)

message: Not many people are going to see "Jack Hobbs" without thinking of the great cricketer. Is it known whether his parents gave him the name deliberately for that reason? Loganberry (Talk) 00:38, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is he named after the cricketer? 
Talk:Gene Mingo

message: Gene Mingo was a friend of mine in 1958.  I believe that he was an Indian, for the most part, at least, and not a so-called Black.  "Blacks" didn't even exist in the United States in 1958.  71.240.3.15 14:46, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Apollo 16

message: Perhaps it would be good to add why the call signs "Casper" and "Orion" were selected? https://history.nasa.gov/SP-4029/Apollo_18-17_Call_Signs.htm
Best, Viranga13 (talk) 01:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Call Signs 

message: *
The title is wrong? And this one feels kind of useless here.--Jarodalien (talk) 14:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been in there for over 15 years, initially added as a general reference for all the numbers cited in the mission; it's a little odd to see it now being used solely to cite the WP:CAPTAINOBVIOUS fact that this was a NASA mission. TJRC (talk) 02:18, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it. Surely that does not need to be cited.--Wehwalt (talk) 02:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: No argument from me. I did add it as a refideas entry above, since it's a great source and if no longer in use in the article is worth noting for future editors. TJRC (talk) 03:00, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's this for? 

message: "There, Duke took pictures of Stone Mountain and South Ray Crater while Young deployed the LPM", before there's only full name "Lunar Portable Magnetometer".--Jarodalien (talk) 14:39, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lunar Portable Magnetometer 

message: Just a beautiful and comprehensive article. Well done User:Wehwalt, the featured article nominator. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 13:49, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. A good deal of the work was done by , although they were not an FAC nominator, they should have been--Wehwalt (talk) 15:22, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. This one certainly has been a long-term team effort. Embodies the spirit of the project quite well, I think. Tyrol5 ▸ [talk] 16:11, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a pretty ambitious topic to work with. Kudos to both of you guys, Wehwalt and Tyrol5. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 16:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Today featured article 

message: Just a thought. JonesyPHD (talk) 16:02, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It would seem odd to me to lend such weight to a fringe theory with no apparent direct connection to Apollo 16 in particular that I'm aware of, apart from more generalized conspiracy theories and the like that are applicable to the space program and modern Earth science more broadly. For that, we have Moon landing conspiracy theories and Modern flat Earth beliefs. Tyrol5 ▸ [talk] 16:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

text: I agree. It is not worth including. Presumably we have articles on such fringe theories, let the interested go there.--Wehwalt (talk) 16:19, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we add a flat-earth debunking section? 

message: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2023/pdf/1025.pdf 73.222.134.53 (talk) 03:25, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Very interesting, thank you. If I've erred in summarizing it, please let me know. Wehwalt (talk) 12:23, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locations of spacecraft and other equipment
Talk:Christopher Rose (electrical engineer)

message: This article was previously VfD'd due to lack of notability when User:Cnmirose created it about himself. Although I agree that Wikipedia users should not edit articles about themselves, I believe Dr. Rose has a sufficient claim to notability that was not properly explored in the previous VfD. Therefore I am recreating this article. --malathion talk 05:20, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Symbolism (disambiguation)

message: just not true.
agreed -- should not be merged.  "Symbolist" is often conflated as one who employs "symbolism,"  however, symbolism has a much richer literary history than just that.
I don't think it is confusing for the reader to be redirected from "symbolist" to "symbolism", they understand why they were redirected.  For example, materialist redirects toward materialism and pragmatist toward pragmatism.  In fact, I think, for consistency, as a general rule, 'ists' should be redirected to 'ism' pages unless the 'ist' is defined to study matters beyond or outside of the 'ism', of which I cannot think of any examples off hand.
::Why not sign your posts, guys/gals... - "Symbolist" shouldnt be an article - we generally redirect derived occupations to their general field. Linguist --> Linguistics, etc. In rare cases where the role itself is notable then we use a separate article. In this case, making a disambig for from symbolism is more appropriate. The tough question - how to integrate symbolism with the symbol article? Maybe we need a template:symbolism? -St|eve 07:37, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Province of Bergamo

message: The Dolomites do not reach the Province of Bergamo. Orobian Alps divide it from the province of Sondrio, and he highest peak is 3,052 m high, not 3,582. It must have been mistaken. --Cruccone 15:20, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The title "Republic of Bergamo" sends you to "province of Bergamo, linked with it:Provincia di Bergamo: I've added the link "it:Storia di Bergamo".Bianchi-Bihan 12:37, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem fixed. FrancescoMazzucotelli 00:27, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:World Heritage Sites in India

message: Any particular reason to change the layout from vertical to horicantal?  I felt to see all the WH sites on the side would be more benefical then to go to the bottom of the page?
15:29, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The reasoning was that it made article layout a lot more difficult.  For example, no images could go on the right where the template was, and with some stub articles the template was bigger than the body text.  This looks a lot cleaner, and functions equally well I think, and so I was bold.  Do you think it should go back?  Wouldn't stand in your way, but I think it would be a mistake. -shuri 15:58, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why change the layout?
Talk:Jarkko Ruutu

message: Ruutu is left wing, not right wing. --84.231.9.145 (talk) 18:49, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What Ruutu did to Jagr, and many other players, was pretty fucked up.  Please don't use wikipedia to vent your frustration, though. JesusjonezTalk 22:31, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm confused as to why a perfectly legal hit is "fucked up". There was no elbow, no high stick, the hit wasn't to Jagr's back or head, nor was it boarding. The reason Jagr was injured is the antique helmet he wore. But you're right, vandalizing his Wikipedia page is not the way to go. Elrith 04:25, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: I've added a Hebrew and French version of this page. Why not? J21 03:03, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation 

message: Oh someone please put it here. You know what I'm talking about. 24.87.43.151 (talk) 23:00, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Chris Simon]] 
Talk:Algal mat

message: I suggest this page be deleted and links redirected to the more generalized, in-depth article Microbial mat.  Any opposition? Jstuby (talk) 03:26, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense to me, providing you integrate it. You don't have to delete the page; just redirect it. --Epipelagic (talk) 06:20, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge with Microbial mat?
Talk:Israel Polack

message: Here is my attempt to re-write this article (at Israel Polack/Temp to avoid copyedit problems and improve the English. Comments? Ground Zero 16:03, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. Note that the VfD progressed to cover this de-copyvio'd version. -Splash 01:51, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion
Talk:Glock 23

message: Just merged Glock 23 and redirected into this article which had the correct name. I did not merge the information table as it was copied from .  DDerby 16:06, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

message: I just moved GLOCK 23 to Glock 23, per a move request, the discussion of which can be seen at Talk:Glock.  This article was a redirect with a non-trivial edit history, so I swapped the histories, and the versions that were previously located at this title can now be found at GLOCK 23. Cheers. -GTBacchus(talk) 05:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Discussion on this topic here.  As of late there isn't much in the way of variety where the discussion participants are concernd, so I'm posting this as an FYI to those who maybe aren't watching the Glock article.  Thernlund (Talk | Contribs) 00:03, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GLOCK vs. Glock 

message: It seems like there is a bunch of redundant information in this article.  Stating that the 23 is more concealable than the 22, after the article states a couple of times that the 23 is smaller than the 22.  Also states a couple of times about the ability to interchange magazines with the 22 and 23, needs to be cleaned up.  If no one has taken care of this in a bit, I think I will do a little bit of cleaning up with it.  MikeDawg 20:08, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy
Talk:Budapest (band)

message: After having added few facts and references, I think this article is no longer a stub. I didn't remove the stub mention because I'm a new WP contributor. Lierre24 (talk) 04:47, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing the article
Talk:Grameen Foundation USA

message: This material is taken from our current overview piece on our homepage, www.gfusa.org. Since it was created by staff at Grameen Foundation USA, we own the copyright and are free to use the text in other spaces. If necessary, we can rewrite it so that it more closely aligns with Wikipedia's guidelines.
Grameen 19:29, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Copyvio notice removed. It does need to be cleaned up to more closely align with Wikipedia's standards, both in terms of taking a neutral tone and formatting; I have marked it for cleanup. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 05:12, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Cities along the Silk Road

message: Two issues should be resolved for the list to be cogent:
*Should we include in the list modern towns like Almaty, Aden, Bishkek, &c.
*Should we add a section on the route from the Northern Europe (Varangians, Hansa) via Novgorod, Kazan/Bolghar, Astrakhan/Sarai, Derbent, and Khiva?? --Ghirlandajo 16:17, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How important has a stop on the Silk Road be to be included here? And why are there included places beside the route? I am no expert on the significance of the towns, so see Tarim Basin#History for a (more) complete list of Silk Road stops in the Tarim Basin. I linked there all stops I could find in Wikipedia and on some maps. -- Tomdo08 (talk) 17:35, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tarim Basin