Talk:Jesus freak

message: Was there ever a group called this in america back in the 1970's? Mathmo 13:48, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 1970s

message: The spelling and grammar in the manifesto are dire. Was the original like this or is this a poor copy? I don't want to change it in case it's meant to be like this. Anyone know? Froj 15:03, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manifesto 

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 04:30, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that this article is beyond a dictionary article, and that is has encyclopedic content. It describes a movement. Royalbroil T : C 14:09, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-7 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: California uses the term widely for all manner of over-the-top or annoyingly proselytizing Christians who manage to make others around them uncomfortable (NOT a slur against all Christians and often used by Christians themselves - about those they see as being too fanatical or public about their faith). Seeing how California tends to set trends for the rest of the US, I suspect the term may be just as popular across America and beyond. For all my respect for Australia, even California alone has a bigger population, so that phrase just sounds iffy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.123.237.44 (talk) 02:16, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "In Australia and some other countries..."?! 

message: I believe hippies just called themselves "freaks", so if you were basically a hippy that was into Jesus, then you were a "Jesus freak", that is a "Jesus hippy".  I think it only became pejorative later.  Ekwos (talk) 03:32, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is more or less correct based on the sources. It's funny how fast words change meaning. Viriditas (talk) 07:21, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freak just meant "hippy" 

message: I think you copy and pasted material from here and here. You must rewrite it in your own word or it is a copyright violation. Sorry to hassle you, but Wikipedia is also really serious about that. In fact, libel and copyright violations are really the only two things we are serious about. Really. :)  Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:48, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ooooh I didn't know that! Thanks! I'll be sure to reword everything I took ;) Thanks again. Alliereborn (talk) 08:59, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

text: It looks fine to me. Well done. "Jesus Freak" Google this article as #1 hit. Plus, your work is instantly googlable. If you paste a sentence of what you just wrote in your own words into google, it will come up. In fact, over a hundred people a day will read what you've written. You are making a real contribution. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 

message: I think it's a mistake to say the term was "incorrectly" used as a pejorative. Nearly any term can be used as a pejorative, whether the target group involved has embraced it or not.  Using a term as a pejorative makes the sense of the term pejorative by definition.  I don't think it's a stretch to claim that the terms: "Nigger," "white trash," "Mexican," and "liberal" all can be used pejoratively, or as a term of inclusion. And invoking the "authority" of one fiction writer on whether the term was used "correctly" seems extremely inadequate for an encyclopedia. o0drogue0o 18:43, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, they do. In fact, the entire lede paragraph seems to me to be a serial chain of contradictory sentence in alternation, one after another. Your commentary on these matters was spot on, btw..it is rare to come across folks who fully grasp these concepts, even amongst intelligent circles. So, cheers to thee, whoever and whenever thou art and wrote this. Firejuggler86 (talk) 06:44, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pejorative 

message: In the early 1970's, Jesus Freaks were called "freaks" because they, as individuals, had a sudden, overwhelming, involuntary, transcendental experience, in which Jesus Christ paid them a personal visit.  Having no explanation, and finding no explanation in popular culture, they took their experience at face value and concluded that 1. Jesus was real, 2. that they should worship him, 3. they should preach in his name, and 4. they should associate with each other.  To the best of my knowledge, these were once-in-a-lifetime experiences and were never repeated.  I cannot say if this was the start of the current fundamentalist movement.  I think the distinction between freaks and earlier fundamentalists needs clarification.  I don't imagine they much cared for each other.
Since then I have been out of touch.  It is unknown to me, and of great personal interest, if this is still the standard method of "induction" into this exclusive club.  Or if this has been superseded by the standard "circus tent" revival meeting.  Which at the time was wickedly parodied by Marjoe Gortner.      
While one might expect Jesus Freaks to have been an outgrowth of LSD tripping, they were not.  LSD as a pop drug started in the mid 1960's and though there were good trips and bad, religion was rarely if ever a part of them.  Jesus freaks started about seven years later.  As I had a "freak" experience myself, I strongly suspect Jesus Freaks were like me:  No drug use whatever.  My "freak" experience involved Ludwig van Beethoven and his 9th Symphony and it lasted a precise number of seconds, as any performance of the 9th will time it, to this day.  It was in 1972, so at the start of the Jesus Freak movement.  But as my visitor was not Jesus, I was thrown back on myself for explanation.  Which, after more than 30 years, I eventually found.  Which does not belong here.  
"Freak" may no longer be the customary term, but it was at the time.  It was not derogatory.  It merely signified one who was in possession of his very own transcendental experience.  By the early 1970's there were a great many such people.  At the time, Vatican II survivors, such as myself, were in actual dread of a "Jesus freak" experience, not wanting to be dragged back to a religion we had left for good reason.    
Increasingly Wiki is being sterilized by hard-core materialists.  If I want to read the real poop, I go to the talk pages. Dave of Maryland (talk) 14:18, 8 April 2012
:I would personally be just slightly more hesitant to completely rule out LSD as having some amount of influence in this phenomenon...indirectly, perhaps. Beyond merely the widely known and obvious fact that LSD can have an effect on an entire culture, despite only being consumed by a subset of society, there are also other, more literal senses of the drug's effects beyond merely the individuals that take it. Acid's effects are very often also experienced by others around that have not taken the drug - to a much milder degree, of course. I do not know if this phenomenon has ever been scientifically studied or documented - whether it has or has not I would think to be about equally likely - but everyone who has spent time in LSD-taking culture knows from countless personal experience that it is a real thing. Firejuggler86 (talk) 07:16, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Transcendental Experience 

message: The mention of "jesus freak" in a song or song title is not content for a subsection on the musical influence of the term or group. we need bands, musicians, who are/were jesus freaks and played music. the term was and is well known, and pop culture references for such things are not encyclopedic.(mercurywoodrose)76.254.36.185 (talk) 02:37, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Popular culture

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jesus freak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100911111045/http://www.usask.ca/relst/jrpc/art22%282%29-jesusfreaks.html to http://www.usask.ca/relst/jrpc/art22%282%29-jesusfreaks.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jesus freak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120315155435/http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/ramey/GettingToKnowGrandma/JesusFreaks.htm to http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/ramey/GettingToKnowGrandma/JesusFreaks.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:53, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified