lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Privacy Act 1988

message: The article needs updating to include changes made in 2014, as described at:
* http://www.oaic.gov.au/news-and-events/media-releases/privacy-media-releases/privacy-laws-change-tomorrow
* http://www.oaic.gov.au/privacy/privacy-act/privacy-law-reform
Mitch Ames (talk) 09:43, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs updating for 2014 changes 

message: Why is there no Privacy Act in Western Australia and how is this legally possible?101.168.170.155 (talk) 23:09, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not a lawyer, but I presume that there is no need for a specific WA Act, because the Privacy Act 1988 is a Commonwealth Act and so applies to the entire country (that presumably being what Section 4 means). Mitch Ames (talk) 13:28, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no Privacy Act in WA
Talk:Love Will Save the Day (David Usher song)

message: This page seems to imply that the Album version of the song does not contain the spoken word pieces from Gloria Steinem -- the album version I have has that audio, though, at the beginning and again at roughly the 2:09 mark. Are there multiple versions of If God Had Curves with different versions of the song?
AdamJ 17:47, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *The page only implies that there are other versions of the songs that do not include the Steinem quotes—not the album version. Personally, I have come across a version without the quotes and it is readily available on the internet. I have no idea where it was intended to be released.--142.176.114.188 20:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radio vs. Album Version? 
Talk:FC Energie Cottbus

message: Does anybody think that this deserves an article on it's own or at least a section within this club article? Kingjeff (talk) 03:35, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it probably deserves moved out of the trivia section into the main body, but also needs to be built on some if possible. Wiggy! (talk) 10:21, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 11 foreign players match in 2001
Talk:VfL Bochum

message: The redirect 2023–24 VfL Bochum season has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 14:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:2023–24 VfL Bochum season]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Alemannia Aachen

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:Alemannia Aachen.png, found on :Alemannia Aachen, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 16:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted

message: Is there any source that proves that the nickname "Die Alemannen" is a reference to the Alemanni tribe? It is far more probable that means "the ones from Alemannia". RJFM (talk) 15:26, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nickname "Die Alemannen" (en: The Alemanni)
Talk:Feet First

message: I have just compared two versions of "Feet First" on YouTube, one from the original 1930 release and the other excerpted in the 1962 compilation film Harold Lloyd's World of Comedy.  Yes, it is true that in the original 1930 version, Harold Lloyd's character called Willie Best's African-American character "Charcoal", and when the sequence was excerpted in the 1962 film, Harold Lloyd overdubbed it with "Charlie". Does anyone know of a reliable reference book or online source to provide an inline citation for that? It's a credit to Mr. Lloyd that he was wise enough to change that in the 1960s, since that humor was an unfortunate product of the times. That is of encylopedic value and should be verified for this article. JGKlein 22:24, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Period Characteristics" section - name of African American character Willie Best character redubbed "Charlie" over "Charcoal" in 1962 reissue
Talk:Electoral history of the Indian National Congress

message: This report is too detailed. It does not contain direct simple info of whether the 
party won or lost in a particular state. Its also difficult to make out the info.
Exact no. of votes is just too much info.
Atif.hussain (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 06:54, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Elections Summary

message: The EC report has no info about the following:
*6th Lok Sabha representation from Pondicherry
*7th Lok Sabha representation from Nagaland
*7th Lok Sabha representation from Mizoram
*8th Lok Sabha representation from Mizoram
*9th Lok Sabha representation from Assam
*10th Lok Sabha representation from Sikkim
*10th Lok Sabha representation from Jammu and Kashmir
*11th Lok Sabha representation from Sikkim
*13th Lok Sabha representation from Mizoram
*14th Lok Sabha representation from Mizoram
*14th Lok Sabha representation from Pondicherry
Were elections conducted in these States and Territories? Anwar saadat 17:59, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing elections

message: I am not sure if the Notability Category is correct, however, I dont think this list needs to be here. It is not necessary for us to have long lists of election results for the innumerable political parties that have existed or exist in India. On the contrary, lists as these can be hosted in the Official Website of the Indian National Congress, not here.--Rustam 03:54, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability of Article
Talk:Robert Levin (musicologist)

message: The stub tag seems a little out of place for such a long article. -- intgr 18:03, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Stub might be have been right to remove, but the article still barely scratches the surface on what he has done.  "Start" might be better, but the complete Mozart Piano Concertos project isn't even mentioned here, nor the critical (in the positive and negative sense) reactions to the Requiem completion. -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 12:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've never liked how this article is titled, if only because it does not reflect how he is usually referred to.  Checking a few places where his name is linked, it's usually piped to simply Robert Levin, which is what everyone calls him. Very few people would even know what his middle name is, so hearing "Robert D. Levin" would cause many people to believe it's some other person being talked about.  That is, using the D is more likely to mislead than to make clear, which is inimical to its supposed purpose.
So, what to change it to?  If he's considered the primary holder of the name, then simply Robert Levin would do, theoretically.  But that's already used for a disambig page.  Plan B.  I don't support Robert Levin (American pianist), because although that nicely distinguishes him from Robert Levin (Norwegian pianist), the American is notable for much more than simply being a pianist.  
I think I'd prefer Robert Levin (musicologist).
Any comments before I make the move?  --  Jack of Oz [Talk] 05:09, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: User:JackofOz: Apologies for the late response. I agree the article ought to be moved as you suggest. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:30, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I had, naturally, totally forgotten about this.  Thanks for the go-ahead, Michael.  I have now gone ahead.  :)  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 22:29, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Move proposal
Talk:List of Leopolitans

message: * Ivan Aivazovsky, painter - "Aivazovsky was born in the town of Feodosiya, Crimea, to a poor Armenian family..."
* Tsakhiagiyn Elbegdorj - in article found nothing 'bout Lviv.
* Ioan Potcoava - just "...was taken prisoner and decapitated in Lviv". Was he famous Leopolitan? think not.
::The Ukrainians added them since they wanted to indicate there are some Ukrainians that are from Lviv. 85.202.44.245 (talk) 21:05, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible mistakes 

message: * Svyatoslav Vakarchuk, rock musician // his father was a professor in Lviv, however Svytoslav was/is not connected with Lviv in any aspects of his life
* Roman Viktyuk, theater director //not really known
* Deborah Vogel, poet // not really known
* Andrei Volokitin, chess grandmaster // actully he haven't won anything valueable in let's check in 5 years if anything has changed in his career
Thus, I'll remove this column with the names mentioned above.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.202.44.245 (talk) 21:48, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  V
Talk:JANET NRS

message: Does my memory deceive me, or could one use long-form names for every domain?  e.g. uk.ac.man.cs.p4 could also be united-kingdom.academic.manchester.computer-science.project4? Flup 14:57, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Can someone provide some references or external links about this topic? --TrollHistorian 18:14, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I just finished writing Coloured Book protocols, since there were red links to it, but now I'm wondering whether we should merge the two articles. The Wednesday Island 17:26, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible merge 

message: The decision to use .uk not .gb was not just (if at all) a legacy of JANET NRS. GB does not have include Northern Ireland and at the time the NI situation was sensitive enough that the universities were genuinely worried that people would end up dying over the misuse of .gb for Northern Ireland 82.70.14.226 (talk) 14:22, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The point is, it’s use on JANET NRS (for whatever reason) led to its use as the CCTLD on the Internet, rather than the ISO standard, which was used for all other countries. That is, the UK was the only country with a pre-existing national standard.  Whizz40 (talk) 07:07, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious Claim
Talk:100% Live

message: I found :Image:100% live.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:24, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:100% live.jpg]]

message: :Image:100% live.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 01:24, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:100% live.jpg
Talk:1000 Years of Popular Music

message: I've added a note about the release of the DVD version of this show. Does anyone think it's worth expanding it into a full page? I can add the boring technical stuff (line-up, set list, location etc) but I'm afraid a proper musical analysis is a bit beyond me. Doozy88 16:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DVD release

message: As I found the long anecdote quoted in the main body contributed to the advertisement-like tone of the page, I included some of the salient details into the main body of the article.  Hopefully, I succeeded. 
User:Sappho'd (talk) 21:25, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Style Correction

message: "The album was originally conceived after Thompson was ignored by Playboy magazine; initially meant simply as a list to be printed by the magazine, it was subsequently published into cd format". Needs more explanation. Why was he ignored? How was he ignored? Why did he care? More backgrounded please. Tsinfandel (talk) 13:03, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What? 

message: On the DVD/2CD release Judith Owen is credited as playing keyboards as well as vocals. However, I've not updated the article as I don't know whether this is consistent across both releases. Did she only contribute vocals to the original release? Gwladys24 (talk) 07:45, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judith Owen
Talk:Yahoo! Avatars

message: This article needs to be rewritten in English or deleted. Fnarf999 18:24, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My main objection to the article is I am confused by some of the wording. Article currently says “Yahoo! Avatars are .., available for websites HTML display, in profiles (Yahoo! 360°) and in Yahoo! Messenger chat.” I find the wording confused, as I inferred that perhaps avatars created with Yahoo Avatars could be added to non-Yahoo websites. The Where can I use Yahoo! Avatars? page seems to indicate avatars created with Yahoo Avatars can only be used at Yahoo. Perhaps change the wording to “Yahoo! Avatars are personality images, available for display at Yahoo! services such as Yahoo! 360° and in Yahoo! Messenger chat.” --EarthFurst (talk) 07:52, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

message: IS THERE ANY CHEAT FOR AQ.COM  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.48.203.49 (talk) 11:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  hi
Talk:Bács-Kiskun County

message: Is there anyone who could help to edit articles in English about Hungarian towns? I tried to add them into a category and create a table on the right side, but all my work has been deleted.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Edebundity (talk • contribs) 18:24, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I added a new "request for expanding" sign to the site because I belive the article is still lacking information and there are too many villages that contain no information. (Eddie 20:59, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for expanding 

message: Hi, I don't know what "The escutcheon is stading and shredded shield" means. Is it heraldry jargon? ϢereSpielChequers 15:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Stading?
Talk:Ong's Hat

message: There is also a Ong's Hat, New Jersey with similar information in it. If Ong's Hat is a genuine place then the weird informaiton probably needs moving here and the location info keeping in the other entry. Thoughts? (Emperor 18:28, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK I have sorted the information out into separate and distinct entreies with this one containing informaiton on the story and the other covering the location. I've also had a crack at outlining some of the history and plot but will have to have another crack at it - all the claims are so vague it is tricky weaving a course through things that provides the right information. (Emperor 20:08, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

text: many of the links at the bottom are dead. It is a shame, cause some are old gopher postings. I gopher archived anywhere? I didn't want to remove the links, as they may be useful in tracking down their new homes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.81.52.25 (talk) 01:49, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge or tidy up?
Talk:World Customs Organization

message: Whatever happened to the BTN = Brussels Tariff Nomenclature?
That was how all international trade in Europe was classified at least
a few decades ago. imfred (talk) 10:45, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:I'll Always Know What You Did Last Summer

message: Hi; God knows why I care, but this article is included in a list entitled 'Wikipedia articles with sourcing issues', and is listed as a hoax. While the idea of yet another sequel to 'I Know What You Did Last Summer' is admittedly the kind of thing that gives me nightmares, it does seem to be a 'real' film. How do we have it removed from the listing?
If it's a hoax, then how do you explain the origin of the film I'm watching right now which closely (and poorly) follows the same story as the original? --Yurimxpxman (talk) 09:28, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Hoax'

message: Who is Brooke? I watched the film yesterday and I didn't see her. Please tell me in which minute the Fisherman kills her.
Brooke is the chick from Animorphs which is like Power Rangers. She dies at the very end. The blonde-haired girl
Animorphs is NOTHING like Power Rangers. 152.117.236.80 (talk) 19:04, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: They were both '90's children's shows, though Animorphs was a book series first and a TV show second. Oh, and I still enjoy reading Animorphs, while Power Rangers has been painful for years. [I know it's off topic, but... uhm... this isn't exactly the most important page on Wikipedia. I can't believe they're maybe trying for a 4th movie. If editors really really want, feel free to delete this comment.] 67.158.43.41 (talk) 07:59, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Who is Brooke?

message: I was wondering if sombody could clean the plot a little? I would try to but my grammer is quite bad at the best of times. Thanks! Jamesbuc
Hi James, I recognize you from the Wrong Turn 2 discussion. I agree. I can't believe this movie has been forgotten like that. Especially with shows like TRL.74.195.3.11 02:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot cleanup 

message: I HIGHLY doubt there is another film in production called "The Fisherman" which will star both Jennifer Love Hewitt AND Freddie Prinze Jr. again, even more so I HIGHLY doubt Britney Spears will be in the movie to play a lesbian bartender.  Clean it up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.186.68.73 (talk) 17:43, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lies

message: "Amber's scream is cut off by the sling of the hook hearing." Cut off by what?! Equinox (talk) 17:27, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in plot sentence?
Talk:Government of Denver

message: The current "Law and government of Denver" seems to me an awkward title.  How about something like "Government of the city and county of Denver"?  Plazak (talk) 14:20, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the article to the standard "Government of" naming scheme, using the article name of Denver. Int21h (talk) 15:37, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change 
Talk:Killdozer! (film)

message: In what way is this film based on an urban legend ? -- Beardo 21:23, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: The Plot section includes the following sentence: "It seems to run indefinitely in spite of a limited fuel capacity." Is this actually an aspect of the plot ("Its fuel should have run out long ago!"), or is this just a trenchant comment on the implausibility of the movie? If the latter, it probably should be removed from the article, or at least from the plot summary. -- Dan Griscom (talk) 03:12, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: One of the characters makes a specific point early on that it would run out of fuel eventually. But that aspect was never mentioned again, even though several days passed before the climax. MrZoolook (talk) 01:30, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fuel capacity: criticism, or part of plot? 

message: Film is titled Killdozer, without the exclamation point.2002:620D:3AF:0:397A:4786:BE7A:B035 (talk) 00:31, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Kingdom of the Spiders

message: Does animal rights whatnot apply to arthropods? I think studies have shown that while they recoil from pain, they don't continue to avoid a known source of it, making it most likely reflex action that never reaches their simple brains. That and the fact that everyone kills arthropods.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.70.113 (talk) 05:53, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article has been tagged for needing sources long-term. Feel free to reinsert the below material with appropriate references. DonIago (talk) 18:41, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material
Talk:The Legend of Hell House

message: The opening titles manage to misspell the word 'CORPORATION' in the copyright notice under 'THE LEGEND OF HELL HOUSE'. Noteworthy? 78.150.121.14 (talk) 22:28, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  'CORPOATION' 

message: I'm questioning the statement that "plastics hadn't been invented before Belasco died in 1927".  The article on plastic in Wikipedia establishes that Bakelite, celluloid, and PVC had all been invented before 1927, and that there was an explosion in plastics technology following WWI.  If memory serves, it's not specified what kind of plastic Belasco's prostheses are made from, or even if they are entirely plastic or merely have an outer plastic shell.  Does Fischer even state that they are plastic, or does he simply exclaim that they are "fake"?  Can anyone check and fix as needed? 12.22.250.4 21:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plastics 
Talk:Lemora

message: The plot of this movie is obviously based in large part on the Lovecraft story The Shadow Over Innsmouth. I don't have the drive to add that to the article, but someone should.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.144.100.200 (talk) 16:29, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting. I don't remember the story, but if you can find any reliable sources that make the connection, please post them here. Perhaps one of your fellow editors will find the drive. Rivertorch (talk) 17:48, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

text: The biggest tip-off is the villagers having the "Astaroth Look;" in the novella, it's the "Innsmouth Look." Also, the story involves weird village cultists, some of whom appear humans, others degenerate monsters, who pursue the protagonist through the town streets at night. Just take a look at the Wikipedia article, or read the novella (not too long and a great read) and the inspiration is obvious.205.144.100.200 (talk) 17:18, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe you, but we still need a reliable source to say it in the article. Rivertorch (talk) 05:19, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Ahh, I understand you now. I can't say it's likely that I'll ever come upon a reliable source describing the inspiration behind a crappy old vampire movie, but I'll keep an eye out :)205.144.100.200 (talk) 17:51, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool! You never know; such connections are discussed in books and essays from time to time. Rivertorch (talk) 18:13, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: The Shadow Over Innsmouth

message: I have always felt that the ending of the film (where Lila is singing in the church) is a flashback. I think if viewed in this context, it represents the innocence of Lila, which has now been lost. I edited the Plot section to at least include this (a flashback) as a possibility.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.12.220.250 (talk) 02:09, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ending