Talk:Senate of the Republic (Italy)

message: Just out of curiosity, would it be safe to assume that they named it "Senate" in honour of the Roman senate?Tourskin 18:04, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Following up from this – what is the difference between the Senate and the Chamber? The "Composition" section includes too much info on the "life senators", yet no info on how senators are elected – how does it differ from normal MPs, what are the criteria for being a senator? BigSteve (talk) 10:47, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: :Image:Logo senato.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:45, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Logo senato.gif

message: Is Rita Levi-Montalcini still a member, even though she died on December 30th 2012. If not, could somebody who know more about the senate remove her and change the numbers accordingly. 149.172.233.78 (talk) 15:01, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death of Rita Levi-Montalcini 

message: Seems like a valuable era to devote some alinea's about? --SvenAERTS (talk) 03:03, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWII - Mussolini Era ? 

message: The Renzi reform is not mentioned in the article. When would it take effect?--2A02:908:C31:A600:24B5:F35B:9F7A:60C5 (talk) 02:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reform 

message: Hi all. It's been a while since I have been thinking that it's actually not at all clear the way how we determine the exact numbers for the majority, opposition and support in the infoboxes. This is true on this page, but also on Chamber of Deputies (Italy) and Italian Parliament. The last edit done here by  made me finally take action on this. As far as I can see, there are a few options:
# Use the numbers from the latest (no-)confidence vote (see tables in Conte II Cabinet for the latest confidence vote). The advantage of this criterion is that it's very accurate – there is no place for mistakes. However I would not prefer it because not every MP is present at the confidence vote, and we would have a partial representation of the Parliament composition. This method also implies that a same party can have members in various factions (like the M5S with Paragone in the opposition).
# Use the parties' official positions on the government (and go on a case-by-case basis for independent MPs). In this case, for example, More Europe would belong to the opposition also in the Chamber. This method can also be very definite, at least for the parties (only for a few independents it would be unclear), and also involves all MPs in the total count. So this is the choice I would support.
# Check the typical voting behavior of the groups and of the single group members (so that if we find out that Paragone, even though in the M5S group, votes always against the government then he is officially part of the opposition?). This criterion is very hard to implement, maintain and cross-check, because it involves a lot of work. So I would not support it.
I think at the moment we are having a mix of all these options, which is a totally arbitrary counting method. So, what would you prefer? Do you think there are more options? Please contribute! --Ritchie92 (talk) 10:22, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Majority, opposition, support