Talk:Nuclear power in Pakistan

message: To match similar "Nuclear power in X" articles (such as Nuclear power in Finland), may I suggest that this article might concentrate on the civil nuclear power program, with information on nuclear weapons moved to Pakistan and weapons of mass destruction? Gralo 03:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly, I'm not sure if anyone cares enough.  And then if we did get such an article, it would be full of "Pakistan did this which was purported as for civilian uses but was really just to get the bomb." -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 05:48, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

message: :Image:Shockwaves discvered (globe).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Shockwaves discvered (globe).jpg

message: I recently objected to the change in name of two articles from "Nuclear Program of Iran" and "Nuclear Program of North Korea" to "Nuclear Power in Iran" and "Nuclear Power in North Korea."  I believe both new titles were misleading.  The articles talked about much more than nuclear power - i.e. the use of nuclear energy to produce electricity.  In the discussion, other editors pointed to this and other articles as examples of the standard article title.  I believe this is another case of a misleading article title.  While Pakistan has a nuclear power program, this article talks about much more than that.  So I propose to change the name to the more accurate "Nuclear program of Pakistan."
Views? NPguy (talk) 19:41, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename this article 

message: This article was edited extensively by an IP editor on February 27, 2011.  Most of the edits are poorly written, repetitive, and inaccurate.  I started to try to fix, but this will be time consuming and I'm thinking of simply reverting.  I'd welcome the views of other editors. NPguy (talk) 18:11, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very poor recent edits - fix or revert? 

message: There is a discussion which is also related to this article or category. You are welcome to take a part of this discussion. Beagel (talk) 15:22, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming