lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Carbon-12

message: This template shows code on the first line:

Jclerman 02:03, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I <nowiki>'d the template code in your comment. APerson (talk!) 14:42, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete or delete 

message: Article says:
:The number of moles in 12 grams of carbon-12 became a matter of experimental determination.
Isn't that 1?
Should the text be:
:The number of atoms in 12 grams of carbon-12 became a matter of experimental determination. 
MBG02 (talk) 04:28, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atoms or moles? 

message: Article could mention that C-12 ion has recently found use in hadron therapy synchrotrons for cancer treatment. (Hadron therapy originally used protons emitted by cyclotrons but its "Bragg peak" is imperfect thus causing radio-toxicity in organs located in front of and behind of the tumor targeted. In contrast C-12 has an almost perfect Bragg-diagram and thus seen as a justified method, especially when treating childhood tumors and otherwise radiation-resistant cancers, despite the massive cost of accelerator hardware. Currently Japan is the world leader in carbon-ion radiation therapy with at least 5 fully operational facilities.) 158.88.16.5 (talk) 14:57, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  C-12 carbon ion based hadron-therapy against cancer.
Talk:Token bus network

message: A previous version of this article said that the standard has been withdrawn.  This does not appear to be the case.  The IEEE site [has a copy of the 802.4 standard https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=5097] with no reference to withdrawing it.  It is quite possible that I've missed something, so please revert if that is the case, but also please cite a reliable source indicating that the standard has been withdrawn, not just that the WG has been disbanded. superlusertc 2012 November 28, 10:39 (UTC)
:Standards 802.4
:*802.4-1990  -  Standard for Token-Passing Bus Access Method and Physical Layer Specifications Date of Publication:Oct. 15 2011; Status: Withdrawn
:The 1992 and 1997 supplements also say that they've been withdrawn, though you can still find them archived on that site. I'll revert your edit. – Wbm1058 (talk) 16:50, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Withdrawn? 

message: Refs and IEEE numbering lead me to believe that Token Bus was developed before Token Ring. Content in the lead implies that Token Bus was intended to be an improvement on Token Ring. This may be wrong. ~Kvng (talk) 15:45, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: 802.4 Token Bus and 802.5 Token Ring were developed near-simultaneously by different factions of the 802 committee (manufacturing automation interests for 802.4, IBM for 802.5). 802.4 was based on combining the bus network idea popularized by 1970s Ethernet (the pre-802.3, 3 mbit Xerox PARC version), the token passing model seen in 1970s early token ring networks (like the Cambridge Ring), and broadband instead of baseband signaling. Ehrbar (talk) 23:37, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development order
Talk:Kid Kash

message: Not sure if this was one of his moves considering that other wrestlers seem to use a lot of "money"-themed signature moves (such as EZ Money and Shelton Benjamin). I dod remember seeing Kid use an about-face (back toward the opponent) backwards somorsault flying kick on Funaki during an episode of Smackdown! which Funaki avoided (after Kash avoided an einzugiri kick). Pakopako (talk) 15:11, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Money Clip 

message: He is the current saw champ in millsville tennessee. sawonline.tv  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.118.204.27 (talk) 23:51, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saw 
Talk:Train wreck

message: Should the link to rotten.com really be in the main article as it is? Seems rather like an advert to me. 134.219.166.106 02:15, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed.  I think rotten.com's material does qualify as train wreck but the term is far more frequently used to describe cringingly embarassing yet compelling (e.g. the sort of documentary that The Office is a take on). Bombot 10:42, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah, I think that sounds right. Good call. --Doug (talk) 10:43, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: most train wrecks are accidents, and therefore this section's relevance is questionable. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 23:19, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  legal consequences section 

message: N+5 : the links inter-language runs now. Magnon86 (talk) 22:36, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  In French 'collision ferroviaire'
Talk:Inuyasha the Movie: Affections Touching Across Time

message: The title of the article isn't consistant with that of the movie, any problem with moving it to InuYasha the Movie: Affections Touching Across Time? Tyciol 19:20, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This needs to be moved
Talk:Ashley Wood

message: "His unique style has spawned many imitators"? Isn't that sort of an oxymoron? PCM2 19:48, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Marshall Wittmann

message: Okay, the guy has five decades in politics, and almost everything is from the last two years. Surely there's more to be said about his early career and something should be in there about his youthful Communism -- the guy has really been all over the map. Additionally, the section on his politics as it stands is not just incomplete but has a confused chronology. Finally, the article needs more sources, as it relies heavily on links to his blog, when he's clearly received mainstream coverage that could be used to buttress claims. I cleanup up some of the most POV language, but there are still some things that shouldn't be said without a citation. --Dhartung | Talk 19:09, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Various issues 
Talk:Counter-economics

message: This article is fuzzy and vague and doesn't accurately reflect the ideas of the person who coined the term at all.  See this.  I don't think this should be deleted outright, but it should probably be merged into Agorism.  Thoughts? KleenupKrew 02:44, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006-2007 comments

message: I'm new to these aspects of politics (though not new to libertarian ideas), but here are my thoughts.  I think agorism seems to encompass more than just economics, and the specific idea, essentially, that money can be whatever the trading parties believe it is, is important.  Note that stated as I did, this sounds straightforward, but as we speak, creators of different forms of money than Federal Reserve notes and US Mint coins in the United States are being persecuted because the government does not want the competition.  This is only possible because the idea (that money is whatever the individuals trading think is money) has become controversial--I.E., the people of the United States largely think of money only as that which is produced in franchise with the U.S. Government.  On the content of North America, before and after the creation of the United States, money had been created and used by several other parties, in the "mainstream."  Today, that is no longer mainstream.  It seems odd to some, but it's obviously happened.  I believe Agorists want counter-economics renewed because of the empowerment that independence from the surrounding government and its supporters would bring.  I think you can see how some would say that it's a separate topic from Agorism, though Agorism does seem to leverage it.  I hope my contribution is seen as respectful and insightful, though I admit to being a newbie to the topic. 206.124.31.24 06:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep it separate 

message: I've done a rewrite of the article to clarify different usages of the word.Bradspangler 12:55, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article rewrite 
Talk:Mykola Tomenko

message: One comment on a small detail. That he has a Ph D doesn't qualify him for a scientists cat. He needs to establish notability as a scientist as he did as a Politician. Would he have been just a scientist, he would hardly qualify for a Wikipedia article based purely on his schientific notability. Not every Ph. D. has an article in Wikipedia. The fact that he holds a degree is worthy to be mentioned of course. But he rightfully belongs only to Ukrainian politicans cat as I see it. It is the same as to add category:Beekeeping to the Yushchenko article simply because beekeeping is VAYu's hobby. --Irpen 02:56, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: History is a science; political science (politology) is a science. And, Tomenko is well established professional in politology and history. He was appointed as a decan of Political Science Department of Kyiv Mohyla Academy. Also, "Томенко є автором підручника "Основи теорії і політики" і книг "Історія української Конституції" та "Абетки української політики". . His current publications are available form the website of his institute. Taking into account all of this, while Tomenko is not a rocket scientists, I think he still qualifies for a scientist category. KPbIC 04:15, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Scientist
Talk:Post-stroke depression

message: i have started this but i need help with the layout. i have taken it from my thesis simplified a lot. but maybe still too academical?
: When bad things happen to people, they tend to be depressed.  In case of a stroke, cancer and other severely life-threatening diseases, the blast comes "from within" and creates a big deal of anxiety and depression, with a severity depending on a million things of which none have anything to do with a mental disorder.  Especially not a mental disorder entirely made up, pulled out of noses and voted for and against by the makers of the DSM in order to promote medication, which is more or less the sole purpose of the DSM - to monetize perfectly normal human conditions and reactions by conceptualizing, marketing and exploiting an ever skyrocketing number of "mental disorders" that allegedly need medication.   Pretty much nothing of that is based on real science (but it has tricked real science to swallow the BS in many places), so the article can't really be "too academic" or something. It's just a new label for an already existing and well-known kind of human reaction and like all made-up BS, it does not have any encyclopedic value or meaning.  Sorry, but IMHO the article should be deleted and the term should redirect to "disease mongering". --80.171.134.192 (talk) 11:14, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  need help 

message: I may work on improving this article in the near future. This is a working list of WP:MEDRS I might use. —Shelley V. Adams ‹blamecredit› 03:04, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional sources for future use
Talk:List of The War at Home episodes

message: Someone should add screencaps to this if they want to, to make it simular to Family Guy's episode guide.--Nick Dillinger 02:59, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article should be similar to List of South Park episodes, which is very good and has FA status. Never Mystic (tc) 20:22, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Roxas

message: UMMMM I'm not sure how to put pictures in a Wikipedia page so feel free to help me with that because I really have no idea --sar 03:02, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: YOU ARE NOT THE CREATOR. All you did was butcher a disambiguation concerning actual things in the real world to a fannish summary of a one-note fictional character from a video game. Do not profess to create what you did not create or alter an disambiguation page like that again. ' (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) 04:43, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi Creator Here
Talk:East Tsim Sha Tsui station

message: Arent Asia-world Expo and Disneyland Resort stations newer than East Tsim Sha Tsui Station? matt-(my page-leave me a message) 11:47, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second newest station? 
Talk:Bagabag, Nueva Vizcaya

message: I am American, yet live in the obscure town of Bagabag, in the Philippines. Who created this page?
Lolavista 03:07, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obscure Bagabag 
Talk:Ted Levine

message: In the interview video from 2014 for the movie Dig 2 Graves, he mentions his "girlfriend". Is he actually still married? 174.104.173.14 (talk) 23:47, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationships
Talk:The Saint John's Bible

message: I'm sorry, the person who edited this has trouble maintaining POV.  If you wish to use a page to praise the Pepper Bible, create an article on the Pepper Bible.  If you read the promotional literature given out at fundraising, it is very clear that this Bible is the first commissioned, which it is.
JMPowers 03:07, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: While it does not threaten the Saint John's Bible's title of first commissioned handwritten illuminated bible it might also be interesting to mention the “Bulley Bible.” I believe the Bulley Bible was made by Edward Bulley between 1969 and 1983 during his retirement.
As far as I know the Bulley Bible is still owned by Westmister Cathedral in London, yet not on public display.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.211.118.237 (talk) 20:35, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another handwritten illuminated bible (not commissioned) 

message: The opening sentence says "...first completely handwritten and illuminated Bible to have been commissioned by a Benedictine Abbey since the invention of the printing press."  Which printing press is that? Is it a block press or movable type press? Is it a European press or a Chinese press?  Perhaps it would be better simply to give a year instead. SlowJog (talk) 15:16, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Since the invention of the printing press? 
Talk:World Without End (film)

message: Though there's a certain amount of logic to this, that perhaps the story began with that concept in mind, all the stuff in World Without End is in CinemaScope and Flight to Mars was standard ratio. The only similarity is the design of the space ship and the fact that it crash-lands in the Martian arctic... and it doesn't even land the same way.  Anybody for deletion of the line?  Ted Newsom (talk) 22:51, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "stock footage from Flight to Mars"-- 
Talk:2004 Ryder Cup

message: We need more individual Ryder Cup pages.--Nick Dillinger 03:13, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was going to add this as a footnote to the statement that Monty hit the winning putt, but I want to run it by people first, as it is slightly controversial:
Montgomerie is widely credited as having holed the winning putt, although Ian Poulter birdied on the 15th hole of his match to guarantee a half point and so mathematically win the Ryder Cup seconds before Montgomerie.  This was commentated on by course commentators and Radio Five, whose Golf correspondent Ian Coulter recalled in the News of the World: "My editor said Poulter was three up seconds before Monty hit his putt. Then Colin's putt went in - you can imagine the situation. To have over-ruled his achievement would have been like trying to deny Alan Shearer a goal that went in off a defender." "This man won us Ryder Cup - not Monty" News of the World (London); Sep 26, 2004; Geoff Sweet; p. 75.  Frank Keating of The Guardian also noted this chain of events, writing "radio logged the fact that it was not Montgomerie's putt which actually clinched the cup but Poulter's, a matter of seconds before and a few holes behind." "Golf, Cricket: Notes from the touchline" The Guardian (Manchester); Sep 24, 2004; Frank Keating; p. 34
It's all cited, and I think adding it allows us to document a neutral point of view, but I'd like other opinions. Hiding Talk 21:03, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monty's putt 
Talk:Survivor: Cook Islands

message: Where's the reception and ratings for Survivor: Cook Islands? --TMProofreader (talk) 14:51, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: There is a proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Survivor task force#Jury vote tables to list the vote totals in the same order as the names in the finalist row immediately above the vote totals. All interested editors are invited to join that discussion.  Since the Survivor task force appears to be inactive, I'm notifying Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Reality television task force and the talk pages for each Survivor season in order to reach interested editors.  Schazjmd (talk) 16:41, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survivor jury vote table discussion
Talk:Hiram Berdan

message: That just doesn't sound right, you sure he wasn't a Major General? --V. Joe 03:16, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: An American Colonel General?!?
Talk:Kata guruma

message: I noticed that there are no martial arts description of techniques in WikePedia.
I think such pages could be very interesting.
Biggest problem, I think, would be getting copyright free media.
I've got videos from the web for a lot of the judo techniques.
I have'em categorized as demonstrated, randori, and tournament, and fights.
But I don't think I can share them with wikipedia.
Also, it be cool if such pages had a consistent layout.
And have a wikipedian attempt at inter-relating the various branches of the martial arts.
--Pereza 03:16, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Added exemplar videos.
My view is that if one finds, for example, a better demonstrated video, then
one should replace the current one with it. But
I don't think it useful to load up the pages with external link videos.
I would have liked to have added a tournament video, but
tipically Kata Guruma is done in one of it's drop variants.
These variants, to me, make the technique different enough to warrant a separate treament,
if not in a separate page as a different techinique, then maybe under a "variants" heading.
--Pereza 23:02, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technique Description 

message: Here I see, not just who inveted the technique, if known, but
famous bouts.  For example "Kimura" vs. "Helio" gave one of the Judo techniques
the alias "Kimura" now taught in Brazilian JuJitsu.
--Pereza 23:21, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technique History 

message: Done. --Nightshadow28 16:11, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese script
Talk:Tiger Mask

message: This article is about two distinct subjects.  Although they're related, linking to each other seems sufficient. GaryColemanFan 15:35, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting article 

message: Ep. 105: Japan Air Lines (JAL) JA8117. Destination? --95.244.2.122 18:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naoto Date's Flight 

message: Please, someone can create this page with all anime characters? This is the complete list of anime characters: タイガーマスク キャラクター名鑑. --79.24.237.182 10:41, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of Tiger Mask characters]] 

message: During the series, this dates are reported in journals, posters, tickets, letters, ecc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.54.50.189 (talk) 14:47, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline in the anime version 

message: I have removed text with a fan link His name was never revealed during the series. This is the official source. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:11, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed claimed source
Talk:John Higgins (comics)

message: Is this the guy who colored Watchmen?
I assume so - he has worked with Moore before so it'd make sense. (Emperor 16:20, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Watchmen
Talk:Nobuhiko Takada

message: "Though Takada was originally brought in to attract fans, the show lack of skill and fighting spirit made the japanese public boo Takada in his later performances. Sakuraba will carry Pride status of local star while Takada will be forgoten."
What is this garbage? I'm not debating it's truth, but this desperately needs some references and fixing.
Edgar 05:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transition to MMA 

message: Well I was looking some videos on YouTube and everyone was 100% sure that his fight against Coleman was fixed. Does anyone have some kind of reference about this? Yet Inue (talk) 05:34, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed Fight? 

message: Since this fight was revealed by the organization as fixed, why is it even on his pro record? --JY23 (talk) 21:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coleman issue 

message: Why were all references to the fixed nature of all of Takada's mma "fights" removed from this article?  Unless someone can explain why that information about Takada's only wins is irrelevant to an article about an alleged mma fighter, I will revert the deletions.  Mr JM  01:06, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: FIXED FIGHTS
Talk:New York State Route 35

message: This article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary.Fwgoebel 16:57, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of Intersection Template 

message: Where is this, and has it been fixed? --Kedalfax 20:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This sign is in Peekskill, on South StreetCentral Avenue at the intersection with South Division Street. But I don't think the sign is wrong. The left direction is a one way street while the right direction is a two-way street. --Polaron | Talk 21:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is this? 

message: *Peekskill
**CR 25A (Main St)
**CR 63 (South Division St)
**CR 24 (Crompond Rd)
*Cortlandt
**SH 331 (Peekskill line to Yorktown line)
*Yorktown
**SH 331 (Cortlandt line to BMSP)
**SH 332 (BMSP to Saw Mill River Rd)
**SH 149 (Crompond Rd to Somers line)
*Somers
**SH 149 (Yorktown line to Tomahawk St)
**SH 769 (Tomahawk St to NY 100)
**SH 900 (NY 100 to Bedford line)
*Note: Passes through a very short section of Lewisboro town
*Bedford
**SH 900 (Somers line to NY 22)
**SH 9251 (NY 22 to Lewisboro line)
*Lewisboro
**SH 9251 (Bedford line to NY 121)
**SH 150 (overlap with NY 121)
**SH 899 (NY 121 to Connecticut state line)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Polaron (talk • contribs) 20:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maintenance segments
Talk:New York State Route 495

message: I think that the exit list is out of order.  I know that the streets in that part of Manhattan are numbered in order, from south to north.  For example, 42nd street and 36th street are not between 39th street and 30th street.  However, I am not absolutely sure of the order of the exits, which may differ from the order of the streets.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.10.94.35 (talk) 21:18, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:New York State Route 129

message: This article says twice, once in the intro and once in the History section, that "ramps" to the Taconic State Parkway were removed in 1969.  As can be confirmed from aerial images and topographic maps from that period (and as I know from having been driven on that road at that time), there were no ramps. There were at-grade intersections between Rte 129 and the Parkway at (or very close to) the two points where the two overpasses now exist. There was an overlap of the two roads in between the two intersections. (The Parkway then was an undivided two-way road that followed what was now the southbound lanes north of Rte 129, and what is now the northbound lanes over the reservoir to the south.) --R'n'B (call me Russ) 20:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ramps? We don't need no stinking ramps!