Talk:Atomic line filter

message: I've been reviewing this article, and have determined that it meets the qualifications for GA status. It is well written, well referenced, and has some very useful infographics. It is a highly technical article about a technical topic, but the author(s) have made a good attempt to clarify terms, and avoid jargon. I've got a few small suggestions for further improvement, beyond continued attempts to expand the article.
* A very small suggestion... The Chicago Manual of Style (CMS) suggests that inline citations refering to an entire sentence should happen after the full stop of the sentence. Your article places them before the full stop. CMS isn't wikipedia policy, and the guidelines are a bit unclear about what should be used, but in my experience, the CMS style looks a little smoother, and is what is most commonly used in other articles. You can change it, or not change it, but I thought I'd point it out as something I found a little odd looking.
:Done -- Rmrfstar 03:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Roger. I think I've made everything that's already in the article more accessible, and I shall continue to keep it that way. -- Rmrfstar 03:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the review and for the praise. -- Rmrfstar 03:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a [[WP:GA|Good Article]] 

message: There is an atrocious quadruple-"filter" in the first sentence that comes off so puerile, no?  And on the front page!
172.162.185.52 07:12, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed it. I dunno if I like it more though... -- Rmrfstar 00:36, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording of first sentence

message: they may be used for analyzing the earth's thermal libido, 
I think this should be albedo.  (Presumably an error rather than vandalism as it was posted by the article's main editor: diff.)  I tried to look at the Gelbwachs 1988 source to check this, but it requires a subscription. -QuantumEngineer 17:48, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spellcheck gone awry? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Atomic line filter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www2.naic.edu/~jonathan/pres/FADOF-colloquium.ppt
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060823170658/http://earth.engr.ccny.cuny.edu/noaa/doc/seminar/doc/Jim_Sherman031005.pdf to http://earth.engr.ccny.cuny.edu/noaa/doc/seminar/doc/Jim_Sherman031005.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930200638/http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/definition/Voigt+filter to http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/definition/Voigt+filter
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:54, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Atomic line filter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060823170700/http://www2.naic.edu/~jonathan/pres/FADOF-colloquium.ppt to http://www2.naic.edu/~jonathan/pres/FADOF-colloquium.ppt
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:14, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: As part of an effort to check all old featured articles, I'm checking the current article against the FA criteria. The article seems to be largely based on pre-2005 sources, and I cannot imagine that development stopped since. There are some uncited paragraphs, WP:sandwiching, potential violation of WP:PRICE, and the first sentence has only half of a comparison (more effective than what?). If this article cannot be improved via talk, it will likely be submitted to WP:featured article review. FemkeMilene (talk) 09:47, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:URFA/2020]]