lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dib (Invader Zim)

message: Q: Since Dib's father is Professor Membrane, wouldn't that make Dib's name "Dib Membrane?"
A: No, it's stated in the comentry at several points that membrane is his first name. Jhonen wanted the classic joke of a charicter with no known last name
I think "Membrane" is actually the first name of Dib's father. The reference to Dib Membrane should be removed.--Sobekneferu 06:39, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please note: any unsourced speculation/claims about the series do NOT belong here. If you believe you have some information that has been confirmed to be true, make sure you back it up with a reliable source. --InShaneee 03:12, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dib's mother, future, ect 

message: Isn't it true that Vasquez was constantly trying to kill off and/or replace Dib, due to his own dislike? I remember reading that Nick had several episodes edited which were origanally intended to kill Dib. --Wack'd About Wiki 01:48, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 

message: I found a book in the bookstore called Not Just Cartoons: Nicktoons! by Jerry Beck. I'm not going to buy it and join the project, but I will ask the other members to get the book so that they can add real world information about various fictional characters.
This makes the creation of separate articles for *many* fictional characters feasible. Having information about the development of the character will make the articles satisfy Wikipedia:Notability (fiction)
WhisperToMe (talk) 04:22, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A source that could be used: Jerry Beck's Not Just Cartoons: Nicktoons!
Talk:LITS

message: Am I missing something?  I ask because it appears Nuruomino number 1 in Puzzle Box 7 has four valid solutions.  - ZM
:The missing rule is: "tetrominoes which have the same shapes must not touch each other." --Pitan 23:39, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If it makes you feel any better, that's how I got the basis of pretty much all of my rules ... until I eMailed Jimmy and company over at Nikoli and got them to clarify.  I got most of them right, but I missed that particular rule as well with Nuruomino. Phil Bordelon 21:24, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rules

message: Nuruomino was renamed LITS in the last issue (#112) of Puzzle Communication Nikoli. Each letter of LITS represents a type of tetrominoes. --Pitan 07:37, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone opposed to my moving the article?  I assume not, but...  - ZM  Zotmeister 15:07, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: LITS

message: We ought to have some links to websites with LITS puzzles on.  Does anybody know of any?  The infoseek site appears to have only one puzzle, unless it just isn't working properly for me.... -- Smjg 01:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of puzzles? 

message: There is a link in the article to a presentation on how LITS is NP-complete. However, the presentation analyzes a version of LITS sans the "no two congruent tetrominoes may touch" rule, and hence isn't entirely relevant. Should this link therefore be deleted? GLmathgrant (talk) 17:11, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a head cold so my math may be off, but wouldn't the added constraint make it more likely to be NP-complete, so that if without it it is then with it it must also be? DreamGuy (talk) 23:32, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a mathematician, and I agree with GLmathgrant.  The additional constraint makes the paper incorrect.  It may or may not be easy to modify the construction in the paper so that it correctly matches the LITS constraints, but that would qualify as original research rather than referencing published results.  At risk of prompting an edit war, I will proceed to remove the link.  I recommend that a peer-reviewed reference using the full rules be found before adding a link back.  165.125.144.16 (talk) 17:56, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NP-complete? 
Talk:Bendix G-15

message: I removed this external link:
* Picture of a G-15
because it isn't a picture of the Bendix G-15 computer.  Bubba73 14:19, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
Needs more sources to become a B article. Astropiloto (talk) 15:51, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

message: There is a mixture of present tense and past tense in the article.  Which should be used? Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 05:04, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: MOS says use present tense.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 05:06, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  present/past tense
Talk:The Nigger Bible

message: Is it a novel, or is it a non-fiction book? -- Antaeus Feldspar 14:19, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This seems to me like a monumentally important work of american political literature.  It was suggested to me today, and I was saddened to see such a limited article on the Book.  In an initial, cursory attempt to take the presented information and move it to a more encyclopedic style, I was even more distraught to find almost no referenceable review material, or analyses online or even revered in tertiary material.  It's like no one acknowledged this book, except by title and in praise in passing whilst discussing other books. 
I hope the original contributor of the article and others can help to improve it, finding online reviews of hte book, analyses of its content and intention, etc.  The text, as written, was unfortunately quite clearly an analysis and is subject to No Original Research rules and NPOV.   Referring to the author's intent directly is risky (and yes, I did it - for lack of sources), as well as praising its own analyses, rather than describing them.  Hopefully a more complete picture of this book can be brought to the table, with more scholarship.   Heck, I'd even take self-published essays (which are mostly a no-no on Wikipedia) over no references and some boosting in the article.
Having read two chapters of the book now thanks to Amazon, I can say I truly hope this important book is better described on Wikipedia --Christian Edward Gruber 05:01, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV and encyclopedic style
Talk:Citizens Medal

message: Spelling mistake. The article should be called "Citizens Medal" not "Citizen's Medal."
::Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation and sign your vote with ~~~~
Support
rrzzrr 00:09, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Talrias (t | e | c) 11:34, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Actually, it should be merge/redir'd to Presidential Citizens Medal. Niteowlneils 22:17, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Derby Works

message: I'll have a go at it when I get time Chevin 14:29, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article development 

message: May I suggest this is renamed "Derby Locomotive Works" to distinguish it from Derby Carriage and Wagon Works 86.130.29.192 (talk) 14:08, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It was renamed "Derby Railway Works" for a time (given that there other works in Derby - like Rolls-Royce) However, at that time, there was an editor with a bee in his bonnet that all the articles on railway locomtive factories should simply be "..... works" so he peremptorily changed it back. 81.152.161.207 (talk) 11:27, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggest rename
Talk:Cologne Bonn Airport

message: I am not sure of the wikipedia convention. However the official title of this airport is Köln Bonn. (see http://www.koeln-bonn-airport.de/index.php?lang=2). I therefore suggest our title and links should be the same. Any comments? --Silver149 14:34, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The airport is often referred to as "Cologne Bonn" in English-speaking circles, and even the airport sometimes refers to itself that way (e.g., the text here and on many other pages on their site). That notwithstanding, if you want to move this article, I, for one, would not object. —Caesura(t) 22:38, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The airport is called Cologne/Bonn "Konrad-Adenauer" airport since 1994. Before it was only Cologne/Bonn. But not many people call it Konrad-Adenauer airport. Even on the official homepage and at the embedded train station it says Cologne Airport so you are right to use this name. Panth 20:22, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 
Talk:Tobey Maguire

message: I removed the fan site URL from the infobox per the Template:Infobox person instructions: "Official website only." The instructions say unofficial URLs should be moved to the external links section; however, fan sites don't belong there either per WP:FANSITE. --momoricks 19:21, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed fan site URL from infobox 

message: We also need to add this "Bully Maguire" meme to this page, because this is gaining a cult following now a days. We may add this to his legacy section something. HeroNumberZero (talk) 18:04, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure there is a need to add a somewhat random meme - that really has nothing to do with the actual person - to this BLP article... Shearonink (talk) 18:26, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bully Maguire 

message: At this point they are basically confirmed for the movie because of all the leaks 2600:6C54:4E00:E71:6408:B796:8845:FF1B (talk) 18:12, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spider-Man no way home 

message: I am simply seeking a fan mail address and think the page could be improved by having one linked or directed to where one can be found. 75.175.145.243 (talk) 09:15, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:BLPPRIVACY applies. SSSB (talk) 10:46, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fan mail Address or email address 

message: Under Tobey Maguire's "Personal Life", there is a misspelling of "Universal Studios".
Here is the sentence in question:
"Meyer's father, Universal Studos head Ronald Meyer, reportedly helped Maguire regain his job after being fired from Spider-Man 2 in 2003." 98.148.182.19 (talk) 02:48, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: . InfiniteNexus (talk) 05:21, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misspelling 

message: Change children 2 to children 3. 2600:6C50:183F:4F68:60B9:1031:4FA1:D692 (talk) 20:51, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Cannolis (talk) 20:57, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 January 2023
Talk:Kidney bean

message: This page has copyrighted information and needs to be rewritten or otherwise cleaned up!  I don't know the appropriate tag, so I'm applying cleanup in the hopes that someone helpful will come along.  I'd be bold, but I have only peripheral interest in this topic. -- Sy / (talk)
:I reverted the copyvio addition.  I actually think this page (along with navy bean and pinto bean) should be a redirect to Common bean which should discuss all the common varieties. -- WormRunner | Talk 17:54, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sad but true.  — Pekinensis 18:05, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. — Pekinensis 19:55, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyrighted information 

message: What are the differences in nutritional content between the different varieties of kidney bean ?
Also, Is there a difference in nutrients between cooked and uncooked kidney beans?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leningrad (talk • contribs) 17:17, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  differences in nutritional content 

message: Who wrote this? Kidney beans and red beans are different. Red beans and rice is traditionally made with red bean, not kidney beans.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.56.38.226 (talk) 02:27, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red beans used in red beans & rice are not kidney beans 

message: The nutritional info box shows values for uncooked beans, but since the usual way to eat them (which is how nutrition affects people) is to eat them cooked.
It's a non-controversial change (in my eyes) but it will take a few minutes work and I had bad experiences recently with long-time editors instant reverting anything by newbies, so I thought I'd clear it here first. Great floors (talk) 15:41, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  OK to use cooked values? 

message: It would be interesting (and an improvement to the article) if some knowledgeable person could explain the origin of 'cannellini' (as applied to these beans). Nick Michael (talk) 12:39, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology of 'cannellini' 

message: I have removed a reference to the first version of FDA's "Bad Bug Book" along with the "five fold" potentiation claim. I made a few google searches to find a source for any potentiation, but the best I could find was this unsourced SE post. Given that the FDA has removed the claim, I think it makes sense for us to remove it if we cannot source it. - trysten (talk) 10:33, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad Bug Book update
Template talk:DrugsNotice

message: See Wikipedia:Template locations for discussion on template placement (article versus talk page). <>Who?¿? 15:41, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Template placement

message: "ensure your edits are consistent with the goals of the project." Don't think I've seen this kind of wording on a Wikiproject's tag before. Is the project really supposed to assert its goals on the article in this way? heqs 09:26, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:OWN]]
Talk:The Sandman (2000 film)

message: I'm not sure if it's appropriate to have both films on the same page but when I was starting cleaning up the page I thought it was about the 1991 one, not the Brothers Quay.
I've been looking everywhere for a video of this version. The Paul Berry version is all over the internet, and it was all I could find. Anyone have any luck? --96.238.162.91 (talk) 21:39, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Claisen rearrangement

message: This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kchemyoung.
== There are people who are taken to calling nucleophilic interception of the Staudinger ligation product the "Bertozzi-Staudinger reaction", but it's not synthetically useful, and it's not particularly novel.  Also, the transition-metal catalyzed version of the Mapp Reaction was independently and concurrently reported in the literature by another group, but the Mapp group did a more thorough characterization of both reactions very shortly afterward.
In the image http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ireland-Claisen_Rearrangement_Scheme.png BuLi is not the correct base to have over the reaction arrow.  The problem is that BuLi will reaction with the ester at the carbonyl (as a nucleophile rather than a base) to produce a tertiary alcohol.  LDA is a better choice of base.  I can re-do the figure, but at the moment I'll leave this edit for the author of the original figure.  BTW: Nice page!
for the chromium oxidation step, it is easier to picture the arrows as being drawn from the Cr-alkoxide attacking the activated alcohol in an sn2' type attack.   also, this is the Dauben Oxidation. etheiste  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Etheiste (talk • contribs) 19:10, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

message: The arrows for critical steps of the mechanisms for the Eschenmoser-Claisen, the Ireland-Claisen, Johnson-Claisen and the Chromium oxidation are incorrectly drawn and should reflect the proper flow of electrons during the rearrangement process.  It would also be of better service to cite a peer reviewed journal article such as Chemical Review or any of the other numerous reviews or a commonly used advanced text book instead of the rare specialty books.  It may also make more sense to move the oxidation chemistry and the allylic rearrangements to individual pages and include links.  DrRerNatDHW (talk) 15:27, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Easy enough to fix the diagrams, if you could please clarify which specific pieces of which specific files are wrong? For example, the key pericyclic step of the Johnson-Claisen mechanism, the mechanism for the "heat" of :File:Johnson Claisen Mechanism.png, looks fine in that reaction sequence. DMacks (talk) 19:13, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrectly drawn mechanisms!
Talk:Safe prime

message: Can anyone add a proof that there are infinitely many safe primes? 147.188.192.41 14:53, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can prove that there are infinitely many Sophie Germain primes, then you've automatically proved that there are also infinitely many safe primes. PrimeFan 19:20, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infinitely many 

message: When I was writing a program to calculate safe primes, and when I used the test (2p + 1) in my program, it generated a different list than when I used ((n - 1)/2). And the ((n - 1)/2) were correct ones. Is this the correct test of safe primality? The list of primes page uses the ((n-1)/2) form. So which is it? Thanks. P337 22:29, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Safe prime says: A safe prime is a prime number of the form 2p + 1, where p is also a prime. List of prime numbers#Safe primes says: p and (p-1) / 2 are both prime (it's implied that p is the safe prime). The two definitions are equivalent and the two prime lists are equal. It's different what the variable name p is used for but the defined safe primes are the same (the larger of the two primes in the definitions). Sources also agree on this definition. PrimeHunter 00:24, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Error?
Talk:Iglesia ni Cristo/Archive 4

message: DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.
This archive page covers approximately the dates between 23 June 2005 and 7 July 2005.
Post replies to the main talk page, copying the section you are
replying to if necessary.  (See Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.)
Please add new archivals to Talk:Iglesia ni Cristo/Archive05. Thank you. Theo  (Talk) 16:35, 10 July 2005 (UTC)

message: Does anyone known whether www.incworld.org is active?
I understand you can get a username and password at your locale for this site.
Does any member has experience with this site ?
Coffeemaker 23:04, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  www.incworld.org 

message: As per Ray's suggestion of rewriting this article among the lines of Scientology, I think the INC's doctrines have been explained, sympathetically, and in-depth enough to warrant the start of this section. Keep in mind that a "Criticism" section is in line with the Wikipedia rules regarding religion by examining all points of view, and the articles on the RCC Roman_Catholic_Church#Criticisms as well as the target Scientology article both feature a section on issues some might have with these organizations' practices.  Scientology#Controversy_and_criticism. Before I start, I'd like to hear input from others on which criticism meets Wikipedia standards and which does not. I know what some are going to say, please keep in mind that I contributed the majority of the section regarding Church structure and practices, which I think even the INC members will agree is neutral and sympathetic.--Onlytofind 00:51, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Criticisms section 

message: Which parts of the article should be revised in order to remove this ugly hand?
Coffeemaker 21:48, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to remove the ugly hand? 

message: Anyone care to expand the "Worship Service" section NPOV ?
Coffeemaker 23:28, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Coffeemaker 08:16, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding "Worship Service" section
Talk:Prison–industrial complex

message: This is a well-researched and engaging article, that does a good job of remaining as 'neutral' as possible (per Wikipedia's guidelines), given the complexity and nuance of the issue itself. My only comment that I could point to in this article that would improve it would be to add the 2020's as a part of the "History" section (because it is currently missing), and include a more detailed 'Race' section. This last addition shouldn't be too cumbersome as the topic of race and prisons is well-covered and theorized.  Hosanna.galea (talk) 13:20, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small Edit/Improvement Suggestions 

message: Britanys1 comments on the relationship between the prison industrial complex and the military industrial complex (which Angela Davis describes as "symbiotic") are very important and add crucial nuance to the entry. I made grammatical changes and edits to the post but the substance is well summarized and well written. Genevievejoelle (talk) 14:21, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Britanys1 edits very important
Talk:Masahiro Mori (roboticist)

message: Does the reference here to 1978 and the Uncanny Valley work apply to "Robots: Fact, Fiction, and Prediction" by Jasia Reichardt (1978), page 26-27? Unfortunately it is not made clear in this book what the orginal source is.
Despite many citations, "The Buddha in the Robot" contains no mention at all of the uncanny valley - I've read it all!
However, I understand that the original article was writen in Japanese and the proper citation is:
M. Mori, Bukimi no tani (the uncanny valley), Energy, Vol. 7, pp. 33–35, 1970.
This is given by Hiroshi Ishiguro, "Android Science
- Toward a new cross-interdisciplinary framework" 
I feel that this and the Uncanny Valley article ought to try to resolve this confusion.
Dave Chatting 16:48, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper citation of Mori's original work 
Talk:Pauldron

message: It covers the armpit...and what else?--Joel 17:00, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The upper arm and shoulder. --Eyrian 23:21, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection provided 

message: I'm almost certain the old image isn't actually a pauldron. The source doesn't specify, and it really looks like a couter with attached splinted vambrace to me. I've never seen a pauldron with wings shaped like that. I removed the image until someone claims otherwise. --Eyrian 23:21, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: A thread on MyArmoury.com (not a reliable source, so don't add it) suggests that the semantic distinction between "pauldron" and "spaulder" is unfounded, with "spaulder" being perhaps a misspelling for "spaudler". The two words have the same etymology: OED lists "spaudeler" in an entry last updated in 1913, and says it derives from Old French espalde meaning "spauld", the shoulder of a food animal, while "pauldron" is aphetic from espauleron meaning "shoulder plate", with an epenthetic -d-. The only citation for "spaudeler" is from 1884, "pauldron" from 1594 with older variants to 1396. Hairy Dude (talk) 14:58, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical terminology
Talk:Ugly Dolls

message: This looks suspiciously like a vanity page endorsing a product for sale. The POV on the page seems to be promotional rather than informative, and the notability of the product line is not obvious. --InformationalAnarchist 17:11, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind. Not only does the page seem to be shaping up (though the POV still sems a tad promotional), but I actually recognise the product line from Anime North! --InformationalAnarchist 17:24, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vanity page?