lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dartford

message: I recall that Dartford has some fine pubs.  I particularly remember the low beamed "Two Brewers" with its "Duck or Grouse" signs. Are any of Dartford's pubs worth noting as parts of the community?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.186.118.246 (talk) 05:12, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well lets see..... The Bull and Victoria was originally called the Bull before Queen Victoria stayed there. Don't know the date however.
The Malt Shovel I beleive is a 17th centurary pub, originating where local farm workers would sell barley beer out of the windows during fetes.
Watt Tyler has been mentioned already...
As far as I know the others don't have any history to mention in particular. I could well be wrong though: (195.171.106.3 (talk) 13:15, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pubs

message: I was thinking that there should be a mention about the history of Dartford Heath, including the ancient barrows and dene holes that are all over the heath (195.171.106.3 (talk) 12:06, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dartford Heath 

message: A lot of this is incorrect, I will change it.  (Dartford resident since 1989!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.198.33.252 (talk) 14:36, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Economy Section

message: I voice my concern 213.205.240.193 (talk) 21:56, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vs me
Talk:Clairaut's theorem (gravity)

message: This page contains the same information as Symmetry_of_second_derivatives
:Actually, it doesn't. This page contains a theorem, which the other page does not (it has only a counterexample). Charles Matthews 19:48, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entry is redundant 

message: I agree that it is not redundant, but the two articles should be merged. --Macrakis 01:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: I have removed the redirect, put a disambiguation to the target of the redirect, and rewritten this page to refer to the primary subject where Clairaut's theorem originated: geodesy. Brews ohare (talk) 19:53, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Currently this page makes absolutely no mention of Clairaut's theorem (as defined by at least one external source ). If this can't be explained then I agree with the comments above; this page should either be merged or renamed. Cesiumfrog (talk) 02:00, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New page 

message: This article hasn't relevance as Clairaut theorem in analysis. It should be named "Clairaut theorem (Geodesy)" And the other one (Analysis).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.128.156.57 (talk) 22:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename this article 

message: This article starts with the desambiguation line:
"For the interpretation of this theorem in terms of symmetry of second derivatives of a mapping ... see Symmetry of second derivatives."
Sorry, this hasn't absolutely anithing to do with that. This isn't a "interpretation" of any theorem, because a theorem, first place, it's not "interpreted" specially because Clairaut theorem in analysis is a well stabilished and accepted truth, and there are no two ways to intepret him, just one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.128.156.57 (talk) 22:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big mistake 

message: The link to reference 16 is dead. It should be replaced with https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19690003446, or with the link to the PDF found there. 129.247.247.239 (talk) 14:11, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link
Talk:Superclass (computer science)

message: hmm... there's a missing image in the article... could someone provide link to the intended content? - Blueshade 13:10, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing image

message: I think this article should be relabeled Superclass (Java Programming Language)
C++ refers to the Java Superclass as Base class, as does C#
Ada refers to these Superclasses as Parents or base types
I think this could be confusing to others as well since Java's use of the term super, is backwards.  The term superclass, at least to me, seems similar to a superset.  I don't think this is a stretch. --Ephogy (talk) 12:44, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overly Specific 

message: Go ahead and merge this article whenver..
Cheers Wikidrone (talk) 21:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Merge
Talk:Socratic Club

message: ----
* Socratic Club (Oxford) → Socratic Club … Rationale: Socratic Club is currently a disambig page.  However, the other two links for University of Michigan and Oregon State have been deleted per completed AfD votes, see  and  respectively.  Oxford is the only page that remains, and therefore the disambig page is no longer needed. … Please share your opinion at Talk:Socratic Club (Oxford). Ataricodfish 13:13, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support David Bergan 16:21, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Add any additional comments
===Result===
Moved. Just another star in the night T | @ | C 06:04, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Note to future admin - 29023653 and prev. revisions were part of the old disambig page. Also, there was substantial history for another article in the deleted revisions, although the current appears to be a new one. Just another star in the night T | @ | C 06:12, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support David Bergan 16:21, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Moved. Just another star in the night T | @ | C 06:04, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Note to future admin - 29023653 and prev. revisions were part of the old disambig page. Also, there was substantial history for another article in the deleted revisions, although the current appears to be a new one. Just another star in the night T | @ | C 06:12, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Result
Talk:Foundation for New Era Philanthropy

message: Westwood Endowment, Indianapolis, $2.8 million (less than $280,000)
What is that supposed to mean?
S Sepp 13:16, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. I wrote the original list years ago. My recollection is that some of the organizations that lost money in the scam wore more than one hat; they put money in as potential recipients, to be matched by others, and additional money as "donors" themselves. In the end, they typically lost all of this. The amounts in parentheses indicate money lost as donors (I think). I think the courts may have repaid creditors at different rates depending on which category they fell into, so rosters of creditors were precise about how much money was lost in each of these categories, even if by a single firm. I would have to dig through old court records or newspaper articles to be certain. If you check versions of the page prior to a "trimming" by an editor named "Kingboyk" on March 25, you will see a much more complete list of those hurt.Uucp 15:30, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

message: The discussion page did not have a way to leave comments. A few questions, please. From what I know, that while many of those gullible organizations were in fact in Philadelphia, virtually all major Christian organizations around the US, were victims. The article states that most were in Philadelphia.
Then, Mr Bennett, could hardly be called a Christian, no matter what terminology or lingo he used. I hope this can please be corrected, as it makes Christians look bad. In some cases it can be understood, surely, but I have never read anything which secures his Christianity, only that he pretended to be one.
Then, from what I understand, to this day, there remains nearly $400M completely unaccounted for.
Finally, if you ever can come up with the complete list of Christian "ministries" which foolishly lost money in this, I would be grateful. I think they carefully got all such info off the internet, to save face. I have even contacted the library of Philadelphia and other sources, but no one seems to know. When it was first revealed, it gave the names of those "ministries", but I have since forgotten the list. I would love to have a complete list.
Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bellevue2010 (talk • contribs) 14:56, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  An early version of this page gave a long list of the parties that lost money, and approximations of the amount lost. A later editor was offended by the predominance of christian organizations on the list and removed it. I think you can see his reasoning explained above. Uucp (talk) 21:32, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further Questions
Talk:Z-factor

message: The link to unpublished document listed under further reading is broken because the document has moved. I don't know if it is worth updating the link or it would be better to just delete it: it's just a one-page document, and could move again.
# Old link: http://iccb.med.harvard.edu/screening/Quantitative%20Assay%20Evaluation%20and%20Optimization%20complete%20(3).pdf
# New link: http://iccb.med.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Quantitative-Assay-Evaluation-and-Optimization-complete-3.pdf
JS Hoyer (talk) 16:59, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken link
Template talk:Tim

message: Please use  in this template. I prepared Template:Tim/doc for it. It will made it easier to add and maintain the interlanguage links, for e.g. this time I wanted to add a link to zh wp. --Quest for Truth (talk) 03:54, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: . I did think about unprotected because there are few transclusions, but I noticed it's transcluded in an interface message, so better not. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:34, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template documentation 

message: Per here, please replace this template's current line of code with:

This version is the same as that in the sandbox (as of this post). Thank you,
Sardanaphalus (talk) 10:40, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: The page's protection level and/or your user rights have changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 14:06, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: * Thank you – I've now updated the template. Sardanaphalus (talk) 08:17, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 20 May 2014
Talk:Lillian Asplund

message: This article says that in an interview, Lillian recalled being put into lifeboat 15 through a window, but I always thought that this boat was loaded from the boat deck. I think Boat 15 was on the side of the ship with the open promenade, so it couldn't have been through a window. Boat 4, the one usually associated with the Asplunds, was the only one loaded from a window. Morhange 13:25, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is quite a bit of confusion surrounding Boat 15.  For one thing, ET says there were only 43 people in 15, which means that we don't even know all the people who were in the boat as it has been described as "full" in many locations.  The fact that many passengers were male, including many 3rd Class, indicates that it was almost certainly full.  As for where it was loaded, Washington Dodge (who was in Boat 13) recalled Boat 15 being loaded from the Boat Deck but Lillian was reported "dropped into [Boat 15]" from the Promenade deck.  More info in this thread on the ET forums. -Etoile 23:41, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Ms. Asplund's age at death is stated as 99, after a short calculation I think it's 98. I want to change it, but can't find the proper way.
Robin.lemstra (talk) 13:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Age
Talk:Gulargambone

message: The easting coordinate is wrong, by between 15km and 25km to the West.  Some other sources of coordinate data also list the same incorrect coordinate, so this is probably a duplication.
Using maps.google.com one can see Gulargambone township to the East of the coordinate on the page, at the junction of the Castlereagh River (running north) and Gulargambone Creek (running west).  On the western side of the river one can see the grain terminal on the railway line. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.135.190.104 (talk) 13:35, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I included Alan Ridley: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Ridley
In David Middleton's Rugby League 1994 Annual, he has written an obituary for Ridley where he states "Born in the Western NSW town of Gulargambone in 1910"AndrewRLP (talk) 13:42, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous People
Talk:Oum Er-Rbia River

message: Draa River is also described as Morocco's longest river. (At least) One of the articles is wrong on this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.213.204.147 (talk) 20:07, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morocco's longest river 

message: Does oum er-rbia mean "mother of spring (season)" or "mother of the spring (hydrosphere)"? The second makes more sense, but in that case it needs an extra word the in there to make it grammatical. —Keenan Pepper 22:59, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguous translation
Talk:Owen Chadwick

message: Owen Chadwick is a historian of the Church (or Christianity).  The original author of the article appears confused as to what theology is and what history is.  Theology is the study of God.  History is the study of the past.  I was not able to find any book that could be labelled as theology.  His professorship was in history.  He certainly was a historian.  Was he also a theologian? patsw 13:43, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect description

message: The sense of the first paragraph is confusing to me - it makes it look as though Henry Chadwick, Sir Owen's brother, was the former Master of Selwyn whereas it was of course Owen Chadwick (he's still a Fellow of the College, albeit in the retired category). If there are no objections, I will reword the paragraph Ant368 17:13, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening paragraph 

message: Can someone incorporate selected bibliography of his works into article?--Vojvodae please be free to write :) 20:57, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Selecteb bibliography
Template talk:User age

message: I have removed the "XX year old Wikipedians" category from the template because it was creating large number of red category links.
First there's the fact that most of the expected categories simply do not exist.  :Category:23 year old wikipedians, for example.  If this is going to work, then all of those categories should be built out.
And then there are the large number of people not satisfied to simply enter a numeric year.  There are fractions, smileys, and other things that people have added to the field.  All of these create red category links at the bottom of the user pages.  - TexasAndroid 13:59, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Categories were created for ages 10–19, but I don't know if any others were. I was going to do more but I never got around to it. Sweetie Petie 14:31, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ishana

message: There is another very similar article for Ishan..should they be merged?Lily20 (talk) 20:17, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Ishan? 
Talk:Mike Grell

message: The Green Arrow name is also used in Green Arrow: The Wonder Year by Mike Grell and Oliver Queen constantly says how much he hates that name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.82.68.144 (talk) 16:11, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Green Arrow Name

message: In July 2017, Mike Grell was named the "Fourth inductee into Wizard World's Hall of Legends".  I'd like to get this added this to Mike's awards section.
I made the edit myself but it was rolled back, I'm guessing because of my self-declared business relationship with Mike.
Here's a reference for the award: https://www.newsarama.com/35643-mike-grell-the-fourth-inductee-into-wizard-world-hall-of-legends.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slegge55 (talk • contribs) 13:44, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to add Mike Grell's "Wizard World Hall Of Legends" award to the awards section 

message: * Please provide the WP:WIKILINK for this award.
* When ready to proceed with the requested information, kindly change the  template's answer parameter to read from  to . Thank you!
Regards,  Spintendo  04:46, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 14-JUL-2019
Wikipedia talk:Introduction to deletion process

message: This page is well written but redundant to the intent of the Guide to deletion.  In order to prevent inevitable forking and confusion, I believe these pages should be merged.  Either cut the Guide back (because it is admittedly too long for most new users to read) or simply replace it with this page.  Rossami (talk) 15:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge to [[Wikipedia:Guide to deletion]] 

message: WP:SWAP refers to "Tag A for deletion" which is not defined on that page or anywhere else that I can find. My request for a definition on the discussion page has been ignored, so I am trying to see if it could be defined at Wikipedia:Introduction_to_deletion_process#Some_lingo_and_shortcuts as well as the other page. Wakablogger2 (talk) 09:01, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag A? 

message: Regarding the section #When to not use deletion process?:
* Could someone explain the meaning of the second bullet, "Articles we are not interested in". The "but" implies a contrast that I don't see.
* I tried to fix the grammar of the third bullet, but it still sounds awkward.
* The section name should probably not have a trailing question mark
—[AlanM1(talk)]— 19:01, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed changes to "When to not use deletion process?" 

message: Are there any precedents regarding the procedure for a mass deletion of 106 articles? The redirection/inclusion method is technically nice, but serious checking of 106 articles in parallel doesn't make sense in just 7 days - for example. Boud (talk) 19:13, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Boud: There isn't; see WP:TRAINWRECK. That's why that AFD was procedurally kept. —  (t/c) 15:13, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mass deletion
Talk:The Journeyman Project 3: Legacy of Time

message: Hi, Radagast83.  Thanks once again for your positive reaction to my Buried in Time article.  I think you're doing a great job here.  If you're wondering why I moved the page, it's because there was an error in the title of Legacy of Time on the main series page that I had been meaning to fix for a while.  I just made a few minor corrections here and there.  Great job and keep up the good worK! --Green451 14:13, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I didn't notice the name problem, and unfortunately I never got around to playing the 3rd game, so I didn't realize that I had mispelled it.  Thank you and I'll try to continue to add to these articles. Radagast83 18:38, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved page

message: It would be nice to see a section on how successful (or unsuccessful) these games were when they were released, both commercially and critically. 156.34.213.129 19:37, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception? 

message: how do I get my windows 7 64 bit pc to install and run Legacy of time,   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.164.10.213 (talk) 18:24, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  compatibility issues 

message: Just wondering since PS went belly up  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.241.144.43 (talk) 03:27, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who owns the rights to TJMP 
Talk:Terra Mítica

message: I've reverted recent edits to this article because of the large number of spelling errors and to try and keep to a NPOV, I realise that in doing so I might have inadvertantly removed some valid points, if so I'm sorry, please add them back (See the Manual of Style) --ericthefish 14:25, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pierre-Gilles de Gennes

message: Is it just me or does this entry seem a little plagiarised from the first reference?
I have information on De Gennes which is very controversial but 100% true. At the time when he was in charge of ESPCI he attempted - unsucessfuly - to cover up criminal behaviour by three of his staff against a student. The police eventually became involved and the staff members were convicted. There is solid evidence to support this - in the form of letters written and signed by De Gennes himself. I do not want to post this material to the main page before discussing it first here.DomLor 23:28, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have classified it as a stub due to the views of the editors. However, I believe that it could easily be classified as a start but would welcome the views of those more knowledgeable than myself about physics. Needs further expansion in due course. I have also changed his status from living person to general bio. Capitalistroadster 11:18, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Classification

message: I can not open the links above, what did De Gennes do?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.174.78.56 (talk) 19:18, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crime. 
Talk:Vitaly Ginzburg

message: Светлая память... --Glowings (talk) 13:22, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I think something got translated badly from the Russian here. The relevant source is in Russian so I can't read it. But I'm pretty sure that's not what it means. JoshuaZ (talk) 23:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "acquit contumely"?

message: Can someone put in simple English the meaning of "What gods do the gods believe in?"?--Gilisa (talk) 21:00, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean can someone explain the phraze or put the phraze more simply than the actual words spoken? Are you suggesting that instead of the direct quote, we explain the quote or put it in different words? The quote is, presumably, in reference to his atheism and his being intriqued by the idea that gods might also believe in gods, presumably at the end. --RossF18 (talk) 21:31, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I just wanted to know exactly what he meant. Thanks!--Gilisa (talk) 21:53, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last words 

message: Was he Jewish or was he an athiest?  This article says he was both... confusing. Kehrbykid (talk) 02:36, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Jews are both, and there is no contradiction between being Jewish and being atheist. See Yuval Ne'eman and  Steven Weinberg as yet another examples of self identified Jews who are atheists.--Gilisa (talk) 06:00, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was he an atheist or wasn't he? 
Talk:Forever Charmed

message: Someone should remove the overlong, bloated trivia section and add a detailed synopsis instead. --Jtalledo (talk) 01:23, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: The information on the number of viewers for "Forever Charmed" keeps getting changed back and forth between 4.49 million and 4.98 million (although someone has now changed the number on the Charmed main page to "about 5 million"). Does someone have a source that will fix this craziness? —MiraLuka 19:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of viewers

message: Does someone have a source for the spelling of the spell? It keeps getting reverted back and forth, and it's driving me crazy. —Mira 02:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The spell

message: The grammar, syntax, etc. on this page is absolutely horrible. As is, I can't even follow the synopsis. Would someone who knows what happened please edit this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.230.200.126 (talk) 21:19, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: This page needs major revision