lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Alston Purvis

message: 1. Get any earlier books--articles are not necessary. and add the ISBNs, the 10 or 13 digit number for the book. 
2. Add some bio details--especially his university positions and degrees
3. find some book reviews of his books. Any librarian can help. 
DGG (talk) 21:51, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: next steps

message: The article, as I found it, said that he has taught at the "Royal Academy of Fine Arts, the Hague, the Netherlands." The only equivalent that I can find is Royal Academy of Art (The Hague), so I changed the article to match this; I don't know where to confirm that information. Elf | Talk 00:10, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Where did he teach?

message: I just saw the movie Public Enemies (2009 film), in which FBI agent Melvin Purvis plays a key role. In the credits, consultation credit was given to Alston Purvis, which piqued my curiosity. I was glad to find this article to give me some info. With his publishing history as well, seems notable enough to me. Elf | Talk 00:10, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable
Talk:East Sparta, Ohio

message: Replaced neutral picture with the Winter Pump Picture. Regarding the Spartan picture that was removed (with ability to be implemented) had the name of local business and could be seen as promotional, it can be added along with description of said business' as long as it is informative and non-promotional.TacfuJecan (talk) 10:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: How about if the photo were cropped to remove the offensive promotional nature? Roseohioresident (talk) 16:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That would make it neutral so it should work, with a description along the lines of "Metal Spartan Statue in town".TacfuJecan (talk) 18:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  regarding Spartan picture 
Talk:Mark I NAAK

message: NAAK kits don't have a button, they're pressure-activated - ie, you trigger the needle by pressing the tip against any surface.  It's got quite a bit of punch, enough to penetrate a quarter inch of wood and probably bone, if the needle were long enough to reach your thighbone at the site of injection (skinny soldiers are supposed to use the buttock as the injection site instead).  214.13.173.15 (talk) 02:23, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No button 
Talk:Jim 'Frosty' Miller Medal

message: I believe this article has a consistency problem regarding whether or not goals kicked in the finals are included. I haven't looked in great depth, but when I was doing research a few months ago for 1971 VFA Division 1 Grand Final, I discovered that Miller was not the leading goal-kicker in the 1971 home-and-away season (from memory, it was someone from Oakleigh), and he only took the #1 position with finals goals. Aside from casting some doubt in my mind over the usual assertion that Miller was the leading goalkicker six times, there's a general need for clarification or rectification in the article. Does anyone have the resources available to assist? Aspirex (talk) 06:52, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are finals goes counted consistently? 
Talk:Acceptable daily intake

message: * http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=acceptable+daily+intake&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en
* http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+acceptable+daily+intakes&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--222.67.211.208 (talk) 11:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The scientific info of the term.... 

message: * http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=daily+intake+labeling&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en
* http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+ingredient+labeling&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--124.78.228.135 (talk) 06:31, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Labeling of ingredients..... 

message: Percentage daily intakes while it is commonly used in food industy....???
* http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=%22percentage+daily+intakes%22+edu&btnG=Search&meta=&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
* http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=percentage+daily+intakes&btnG=Search&meta=&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
* http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?as_q=percentage+daily+intakes&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en
* http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+percentage+daily+intake&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--222.67.217.239 (talk) 09:07, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are there no academic publications for ther term of.... 

message: * Acceptable daily application
** http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?as_q=acceptable+daily+application&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en
** http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?as_q=acceptable+daily+application&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en
--222.67.215.44 (talk) 07:06, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info about the topic of.... 
Talk:Just Shocking!

message: The first paragraph begins 
:"Just Shocking!" is the sixth book released of the "Just!" series by Andy Griffiths. Released in late September 2007 in Australia, it tells 10 short but shocking stories about Andy. 
So who is this Andy? Is it the author? A remembered or imagined version of himself as a boy or teenager? Thnidu (talk) 06:42, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who's "Andy"?
Talk:Dermatotoxin

message: I've found a book that indicates that dermatoxin is also the name of a particular chemical:
"Dermatoxin, SLGSFLKGVG10TTLASVGK VV20SDQPGKLLQA30GQ, a 32-peptide isolated from the skin of a single specimen of the tree frog Phyllomedusa bicolor. Dermatoxin proved to be bactericidal towards mollicutes (wall-less eubacteria) and Grampositive eubacteria, and, additionally, to a lesser extent, towards Gram-negative eubacteria..."
I don't think that this information belongs in this article, however. WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:13, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've partly solved this problem by WP:MOVING the page to the more common name.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dermatoxin
Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Iraq War/Archive 1

message: I was unaware of this dispute until I was listed as an involved party (presumably because of a comment I posted at Talk:2003 invasion of Iraq).  I've just read the discussion over at Talk:Iraq War#WMDs found in Iraq and, frankly, it's ridiculous.
The simple fact of the matter is that, at the time of the invasion, Iraq had neither weapons of mass destruction nor a program to produce them.  The main justification for the invasion (that Iraq's weapons of mass destruction posed an imminent threat to international peace and security) was completely wrong.  Everyone in the world knows this, and you will not find a single, reliable published source who disagrees.  Even the UK and US governments have stopped claiming that Iraq's WMDs were a threat.
It is true that Saddam hoped one day to resume WMD production, and it is also true that the ISG found some old, degraded munitions (but no usable weapons) in Iraq, but this was not what the Bush administration was saying in early 2003 and it does not, logically, support the idea that Iraq was an imminent threat and the invasion was justified.
By all means, let's discuss the ISG's findings in tedious detail where appropriate but the lead section should be worded so the reader is left in no doubt that this rationale for the invasion was simply wrong.  Sideshow Bob Roberts 15:13, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I encourage you to accept the mediation so your views can be heard when we discuss the matter.  -- I. Pankonin (t/c) 22:12, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This is ridiculous
Talk:Dose (biochemistry)

message: The page name is more than a little complicated, WP:NAME probably doesn't support it.  What about moving it to Dose (pharmacology)? WLU (talk) 21:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The term "dose" is equally relevant to the field of nutrition, but the article pharmacology says that substances it deals with are called "pharmaceuticals".  Nutrition deals with nutrients, which generally aren't considered pharmaceuticals.  Therefore, I've renamed the dose article to dose (biochemistry) to be neutral relative to these two fields, and implication-free.  The Transhumanist  20:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: Need your input at Talk:Dose–response_relationship#Difference_between_"Dose-Response"_and_"Dose-Effect" on whether there should be a separate article on dose effect. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dose-response relationship and Dose-effect relationship
Talk:Epidemic dropsy

message: This article was initially categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM:CAT. kilbad (talk) 17:58, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that this disease does have symptoms which include pitting edema and red blushings on skin but I feel It's appropriate place after classification is food adulterant diseases Naveen Reddy 14:29, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article categorization
Talk:Hypervitaminosis A

message: This article was initially categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM:CAT. kilbad (talk) 23:19, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article categorization 

message: The article states that "Toxicity has been shown to be mitigated through vitamin E, Cholesterol, Zinc, Taurine and Calcium." This seems questionable, especially since it includes taurine, so I added a citation needed tag. Does anyone have a source for this? Ψαμαθος 08:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: According to the source cited,  of walrus liver contains 81200 IU of vitamin A, 1624% the USRDA. Wouldn't it be non-toxic (and in fact a good way to get vitamin A for people like Arctic explorers who may have difficulty finding beta-carotene-rich veggies) to eat only  of walrus liver, yielding only 5800 IU (93% USRDA) of vitamin A? Obviously that's not enough for a meal, but as a little supplement to a meal. +Angr 12:36, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small amounts of liver? 

message: Not sure why "liver disease" under "signs and symptoms" would need 9 citations.  Should seriously be reduced to just one or two quality references.  Better time would be spent citing all the other symptoms that have zero citations.   Kap 7 (talk) 22:47, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, "Premature epiphyseal closure" with 5 citations is overkill as well Kap 7 (talk) 22:49, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  sign/symptom: liver disease ... citation overkill
Talk:In vitro toxicology

message: To prevent an edit war - WP is not a directory, right? Which is why I reverted those edits. Then ClueBot mistook my revert for vandalism, which I reported as a false positive. Well? CarniCat 17:35, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the edit was promotional in nature and not constructive.  Reverting it was the right thing to do, but because you were removing a large chuck of text, Cluebot mistook your edit for vandalism.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:55, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

text: Yes, I am terribly sorry, my edits were a mistake. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 18:01, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

message: There are several redundancies with the "in vitro" page...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frederic Y Bois (talk • contribs) 17:27, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with in vitro page ?
Talk:Iron poisoning

message: How much is "excess" what is the lethal dosage?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.113.98.60 (talk) 22:31, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: How much?

message: It says in the article" "Toxic effects start ... above 20-30 mg/kg". What kgs? Of a body weight?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.107.196.217 (talk) 07:42, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toxicity 

message: This article ignores canine and other veterinary iron toxicity; it should be re-written with a larger scope (or given a narrower name). Dr.queso = talk 19:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonhuman animals 
Talk:Mad hatter disease

message: Just to note that I removed the merger tag from the article suggesting a merger with Minamata disease. Both mad hatter disease and Minamata disease are examples of mercury poisoning but I can't see the value in the Minamata disease article mentioning mad hatter disease. The person who originally tagged the article also didn't provide a reason on the talk page prior to tagging. Bobo12345 (talk) 06:20, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The overlap seems to me to be with Erethism. While expanding the article I have tried to keep the focus on the hatmaking industry, even though names such as "mad hatter syndrome" may commonly be used in a more generic sense . 86.130.63.128 (talk) 13:55, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Great contributions! Thank you. =) Biosthmors (talk) 14:11, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger
Talk:Ototoxicity

message: Look under "sudden hearing loss" on Medscape.com for how ototoxic agents cause cochlear damage, and for chelation and other treatment options. 24.5.236.123 (talk) 23:32, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: See section below, I am planning to expand a lot more on ototoxicity management/monitoring because agreed, that section is not accurate to what is available today. Derica.parathundil (talk) 21:36, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Poorly understood and not treatable?

message: The signs and symptoms section primarily discusses how the vestibular organs function rather than actually explaining the signs and symptoms. The names of these structures can be hyperlinked to their respective articles to leave space to actually discuss hallmarks of ototoxicity with better sources. For example classic ototoxic hearing loss and expected areas affected. Derica.parathundil (talk) 19:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I am working on providing substantially more relevant information to the symptoms section to replace what is currently there. Update: I just added it in. I would like to delete the existing section that says there is no treatment since that is inaccurate.Derica.parathundil (talk) 21:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to replace current signs and symptoms section

message: This page shows symptoms, agents that induce the condition, but, doesn't actually explain what the condition is, mechanism of action and so on.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.225.133.157 (talk) 12:06, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: An explanation of what it is

message: I plan to add information on how being exposed to excessive levels of noise prior to and after exposure to an ototoxic drug. (AshleyStumpf (talk) 01:48, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Content 

message: — Assignment last updated by JMgeorgetown (talk) 21:35, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Equity in Occupational Health

message: — Assignment last updated by SelahWillis (talk) 21:52, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Advanced Industrial Hygiene
Talk:Reinsch test

message: When was this test first developed/used? 109.246.254.186 (talk) 01:04, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: the following link is free and shows use of the Reinsch test by 1944.
http://hcoe.rcm.upr.edu/publications/sidney_kaye/rapid_specific_method_detection_estimation_mercury_bismuth_arsenic_body_fluids.pdf
108.56.212.179 (talk) 13:53, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin 

message: *
*
*
*
*                          
*
*
*
References to check for more info
--Stone (talk) 21:01, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Hugo Reinsch
Talk:Toxic capacity

message: Just wanted to announce the creation of a new Toxicology Task Force under WikiProject Medicine. Feel free to come and sign up. Thanks -- Jrtayloriv (talk) 04:06, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Toxicology Task Force
Talk:Waterville, Ohio

message: The only thing tying Scott to Waterville is the Vape Shop video where he jokingly "leaked" his friend's address in Waterville, Ohio. Not only does this have nothing to do with Scott himself, but also it's very likely that he nor his friend don't live anywhere near the location mentioned due to not wanting to be doxxed. If anything, a more likely contender would've been the nearby town of Whitehouse, which appeared as his location in the "Tinder" episode at 3:43. But even this isn't certain, since he used his mobile phone which means he could've been away from home when recording this.
What's currently written about him in this article is probably just outright wrong. Horizon206 (talk) 19:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  We don't know if Scott Wozniak is from Waterville.
Talk:Toxicant

message: 1. toxicants are *just* effective compounds?  i thought they were detrimental compounds. the opening statement is misleading, if so.
2. this is NOT a low importance article, & here is why:   with the hyper medication of our current culture, toxic effects of man made toxic compounds (toxic effects) such as the negative (/side) effects of medication, as well as other (all?) synthetic compounds, is AN IMPORTANT COUNTERPOINT.   it is not good - & in fact suspicious - to rate this article low in importance, given the amount of synthesis around us. i say medium. -- lakitu (talk) 20:41, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject importance

message: Removed Toxicants are typically introduced into the environment by human activity. Not sure what that's supposed to mean... its position in the lead tends to suggest it's part of the definition of toxicant, which isn't true. Or it could mean that human activity typically produces toxicants, which isn't true either except in a vague and truistic sense.
The lead needs more work and a better citation. Currently there's no mention of the effect being negative, and the ref is to an article on money not chemicals. Hope this might be a start. Andrewa (talk) 22:38, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed text

message: Removed references to a journalism site for a biological topic. Furthermore the reference was comparing "toxin" to "toxic", neither of which is the topic of this page. While it may be appropriate to reference something like that for a page on "toxic", it is not for "toxicant". Replaced with references to the national cancer institute dictionary. Also, referecnes to dynamic energy budget theory are not core to this concept --> removed. Section on levels of toxicants did not add  anything concrete, nor is the idea that low levels have different effects from high levels of a substance specific to a toxicant -- at least not a whole section for this. Would be more appropriate in a section on "toxic threshhold", or something like that. Perhaps someone could add something back that is brief about toxicants having more or less effect at different levels. 
Nanomed Dreams (talk) 04:12, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits

message: I am dubious that the term toxin applies only to toxicants produced naturally by an organism. This excludes mineral toxins in food like :arsenic and :cadmium. Arsenic is a toxin according to many reliable sources: :WebMD, :Consumer Reports, :PNAS, :ScienceDaily, :Discover Magazine, and :Eos (magazine). -- Paleorthid (talk) 23:29, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Consulting major dictionaries, toxin is commonly applied specifically to poisonous substances of biological origin, so this distinction is commonly made, but toxin is sometimes used more generally. SciberDoc (talk) 15:51, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious
Talk:Jakobínarína

message: I restored this article after the speedy deletion. Whoever done it obviously done no research - Their (hardly common) name returns 210,000 Google results (). They've also had success in their native country and in the UK, have toured, and their most recent single has recieved a notable amount of airplay. Esteffect 21:37, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy deletion
Category talk:Toxins

message: Should the category "Toxins" be a subcategory of "Toxicants"? Several sources (e.g., here and here) indicate that a toxicant is man-made, whereas a toxin is a naturally produced substance. It seems that logically "Toxins" shouldn't be a a subcategory of "Toxicants," but it would be nice to have a biologist/chemist confirm this. Thanks. Lostraven (talk) 15:29, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There appears to be disagreement in the literature on the differences between toxicants and toxins. The two I included above seem to indicate they are separately viewed, but this source makes a claim that all toxins are toxicants. Going to weigh in on the Toxicant page. Lostraven (talk) 19:14, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorization question
Talk:Bellingham waterfront

message: :
I wonder what was deleted to make this nonsentence.  There is no other city on Bellingham Bay.  This is the only mention of Fairhaven; it might be good to mention somewhere that Fairhaven is the oldest part of Bellingham and of its waterfront.
:
None of which touch on any part of the Bellingham waterfront, I'd say, so why list them? —Tamfang (talk) 21:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  other cities, other bays
Talk:Fostoria, Ohio

message: I added the bit in the name and general background about The Mennel Milling Company not because I know anything about the company or the town, but because I saw that the milling company page was an "orphan" and wanted to connect it to the only other page I knew was relevant. If you think this is inappropriate then fell free to remove it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GrassHopHer (talk • contribs) 00:17, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

message: This article may be useful for those who want to write about the history of the Fostoria Public Library. Mbrickn (talk) 04:29, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Library History
Talk:Glucuronide

message: The bulk of the lede image is morphine. When I get a chance I'll fire up Inkscape and try to do this, but the glucuronyl moiety should highlighted (e.g. drawn in red). Preferably, this highlighting could be applied to a simpler structure such as :File:GlucuronidationBiphenylAmine.svg. — soupvector (talk) 13:46, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image in lede is confusing