Talk:Queensland Police Service

message: How come it says "General Employeess" in "Organisational structure"? Is that a typo in the template? Where do the 2 esses come from? 220.253.128.176 (talk) 01:18, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo in template? 

message: An image used in this article, File:Queensland Police Service New Logo.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:09, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Queensland Police Service New Logo.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: The file :File:Flag of the Queensland Police Service.svg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Flag of the Queensland Police Service.svg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 06:46, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Flag of the Queensland Police Service.svg]] 

message: The file :File:Badge of the Queensland Police Service.svg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Badge of the Queensland Police Service.svg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 06:47, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Badge of the Queensland Police Service.svg]] 

message: Substituted at 03:40, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Queensland Police Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110610173426/http://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/view/legislativeAssembly/tableOffice/documents/TabledPapers/2009/5309T489.pdf to http://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/view/legislativeAssembly/tableOffice/documents/TabledPapers/2009/5309T489.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hi! I propose to remove the Queensland Police Service#Former members and Queensland Police Service#Queensland police killed in the line of duty sections. They're both missing the vast majority of people for both, and the former members section is somewhat irrelevant to the general public in the purview of the service as a police force. ItsPugle (talk) 03:16, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed on both counts. The Drover's Wife (talk) 03:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The addition of the Queensland Police Service#Queensland police killed in the line of duty section to the page is quite reasonable and I don't see the need to remove it at all. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 02:20, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:   124 officers have been killed while on duty (See the Queensland Police Memorial), so it's not practical to list every officer (just as not every family may want the death of their loved one smeared across the internet on the world's largest encyclopedia). Even the content as it is, with just a third of the people listed, is really not reader friendly; it's just a huge list of dates, the incident, and officer names. ItsPugle (talk) 02:25, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The list of the killed in the line of duty is complete as far as I am aware as it came from the Role of Honour as cited. I think the criteria of death in the line of duty distinguishes it from the police memorial (my suspicion looking at a few examples seems to be death in road accidents). But I am not sure of the exact difference, but it is the police's distinction, not mine. I could move the list into the History of the Queensland Police or into its own article. Ditto the list of commissioners and the former members, and keep this article more focussed on the current police service. As an aside, being incomplete or even being unable to be completed, is not an argument for deleting something (or we'd be deleting most of Wikipedia). Wikipedia is always a work in progress. We achieve more by adding content than deleting it (other than content which is not permitted, of course). Kerry (talk) 15:29, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

text: Yeah, it's all a bit murky. The Police Memorial that I linked says that they all died on duty, so I kinda of perceive them as dying in the line of duty (most of the road accident stuff seems to be while they were pulling people over etc and they were hit), but even then, the Role of Honour is no longer public (I'm guessing due to the QPS' new website). ItsPugle (talk) 01:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Why has the former members section already disappeared? Kerry (talk) 15:31, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Why would we have it? Other states don't have this random tiny list of some people with articles who have served in the police. The Drover's Wife (talk) 23:29, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Why do we have Notable residents in place articles and Notable alumni in university articles etc? It's just a specialised form of "See Also"? Kerry (talk) 01:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Having said that, I am personally indifferent to the former members list. But I don't think the principle is any different to the notable residents, etc. Kerry (talk) 01:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

text: I agree with Kerry.Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 00:33, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to remove two sections 

message: Ron REDMOND was relieving commissioner during the Fitzgerald Inquiry for a substantial period of time, and when the position had not been advertised.  Should GOLLSCHEWSKI be listed in the commissioner list when just acting in the role?—Q8682 (talk) 12:09, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caretaker acting commissioners to be listed?