lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Royal Antwerp F.C.

message: Is the club really commonly referred to as just "Antwerp"? Whenever I see stories about Man Utd players going there on loan, I always see them referred to as "Royal Antwerp". Can someone please clarify this? – PeeJay 12:48, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short name 
Talk:Royale Union Saint-Gilloise

message: I don't understand this sentence. Could someone please clarify? ClivePIA (talk) 09:05, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See Football in Belgium#Matricule numbers. Nanonic (talk) 00:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Its matricule is the n°10."

message: Seems often that European football clubs have name changes mostly through team mergers or rebirths and suchlike.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.104.162.35 (talk) 23:26, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has it always played under the name "Union Saint-Gilloise"? 
Talk:R.A.E.C. Mons (1910)

message: According to The club website (in French) and even the French Wiki page suggest that the club wound up operations after the completion of the Belgian Second Division season. This was also potentially alluded to 2014–15 Belgian Second Division#Regular season here in the table notes. Thoughts? 184.65.80.190 (talk) 21:19, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Team Wound Up?
Talk:Trade in Maya civilization

message: User:Merope
:It may well not be a copyvio, but rather it reads more like some school essay or assignment. There was a spate of new Maya-related articles created at the same time as this one (eg Mayan Commodities) by about three to four different new accounts - possibly the results of some class exercise?
:In any event, this article as well as the others need a good cleanup, since while there are some generally-correct statements, other parts (eg referring to the "Maya Empire", when there was not such a political entity) are mistaken, over-generalised or inaccurate. The prose needs a bit of work, and the actual focus/breakdown of the article topics need reorg and rename.--cjllw | TALK 11:35, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio? 

message: This article needs wikification - there are hardly any links to other pages. I tried to add some, but lots more are needed. Eio-cos (talk) 19:56, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikification 

message: The Mayans Sell and Make lots of turkey  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.7.91.57 (talk) 09:07, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Maya 

message: This article lacks sources especially for the part on the obsidian trade. 94.254.118.199 (talk) 12:01, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of sources
Talk:RWS Bruxelles

message: Article needs to explain how they won the Belgian Second Division in 2016 but were relegated rather than promoted. Tigerboy1966  19:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Explanation

message: Seems this team is now dead.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.31.254.142 (talk) 03:15, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunct 
Talk:K.V. Mechelen

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support per nom. Sebisthlm (talk) 14:10, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Edward Cooney

message: The date given is 1960, which would have him aged 93! Does anybody have a reference to the actual date? Autarch 18:30, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: His date of birth is provided in Roberts, Patricia: The Life and Ministry of Edward Cooney, William Trimble Ltd. (Enniskillen, Northern Ireland), pg. 1.  and I have already added a citation for his age being 93 at death from the obituary in Impartial Reporter and Farmers' Journal of 23 June 1960. Astynax (talk) 01:17, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Portora Royal School date

message: This article had several factual mistakes, which I've corrected. Someone editing in the past has also destroyed the links with the citations. I will try to reconstruct those as I have time, as well as locate a citation for his age at death.Astynax (talk) 02:22, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Expansion, Edits and Citations
Talk:Armin Jordan

message: According to swissinfo Armin Jordan died in Basel not Zuerich.  See http://www.swissinfo.org/eng/front/detail/Switzerland_loses_distinguished_conductor.html?siteSect=105&sid=7083405&cKey=1158774948000.
Basel sounds more likely to me too - NY Times only source I can find that refers to Zurich; Armin was conducting in Basel five days before his death when he collapsed and was taken to hospital. According to London Times, although 'he was expected to return home, he suffered another collapse and died'. TimR-J 15:40, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Place of death?
Talk:Phillips Holmes

message: This page currently links to the disambiguation page for Trinity College. Can anyone let me know which one he was at so I can correct it? Thanks Kiwimandy 21:07, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Trinity College

message: Does the source really say "a mid-air collision near Ontario, Canada"? You would think they would know which province the wreckage was found in. If it was close to a border, they would say "near the border of Ontario and xxx". Or was "near" a mistake entered by someone who mistook Ontario, Canada for a town? Art LaPella (talk) 22:00, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Near Ontario
Talk:Henry Hartigan

message: Is there a source indicating his use of "Annraoi Ó hArtagáin"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.193.27 (talk) 03:55, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Irish version of his name
Talk:Xavier Bichat

message: There appear to be a couple of misspellings from the French. "Traité des membranes" is the name on the French Wikipedia of an article published in 1800, not "TraiAf sur...". And "Socit" appears to be missing some accented characters. But I do not have access to the original works. Sobolewski 21:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Misspellings?
Talk:List of New York Improv comedians

message: Please do not remove the sources template unless sources are present in the article. There is no magic event that allows for placement or removal of the notability template, but I believe that it applies because it is not clear why this list is notable enough for inclusion in the project. I am restoring both templates. Please respond here if removing them. Erechtheus 21:09, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that a source has been added. Unfortunately, the source does not actually pertain to a single person on this list. Is this original research? Wikipedia is not the place for original research. Erechtheus 15:22, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability, sources templates 

message: I'd like to see the names without active wikilinks removed, as is typical for Wikipedia lists. Not enforcing this criterion allows anyone who showed up for an open mike to list themselves as "performers", and also makes it impossible to identify non-performers listing themselves or others for personal entertainment. How about it? I will probably do this myself in a few days if I see no objections. ubiquity (talk) 22:04, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability of individual entries 
Talk:Lopburi province

message: the standing figure in the seal of Lopburi province is not King Narai but the figure is lord Vishnu Avatar as Rama in Ramayana in thai tradition style. please correct it.
: Fixed. Thanks. -- Lerdsuwa 12:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Pooling (resource management)

message: Does pooling of resources imply a communistic type of arrangement? Or could investors buying stock in a corporation be described as pooling their resources? Aldrich Hanssen (talk) 12:29, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Please consider incorporating material from the above draft submission into this article. Drafts are eligible for deletion after 6 months of inactivity. ~Kvng (talk) 13:40, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Draft:Multinational Pooling]]
Talk:North American NA-16

message: What is the significance of ""Gral. (p) Gerardo Carbajal Midence""????
His name is not mentioned on ANY of the sites I can find regarding this museum - whose own page makes no reference either to him or to it being a fundacion. He is neither notable nor is his name relevant to this topic. This is utterly meaningless to any English speaker without something else. If you must keep re-adding it at least add something to make it relevant to the topic. NiD.29 (talk) 06:15, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Gral. (p) Gerardo Carbajal Midence" 
Talk:North American O-47

message: Why no mention of the version flown/shown in the 1964 movie "The Flight of the Phoenix" ? ? ?
Especially since the aircraft is specifically mentioned in the 'Flight' article/entry.
Just curious. 2600:8800:C89:EA00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 22:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably because no one has cited a reliable published source for it. It's unsourced in the movie article either, and should probably be removed until reliable sources are found. BilCat (talk) 22:29, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lost" version 

message: Could some of capabilities also be stated in infobox (e.g. max and cruise speed, range...), not just far down in the body of the article? I am not at home with airplane articles to know if it's common to have them there. Marjan Tomki SI (talk) 15:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Would some info about capabilities be welcome also in infobox?
Talk:North American P-64

message: There is at least one more P-64 currently airworthy, registered in France as F-AZHD. Photos of this aircraft can be found here: :commons:Category:F-AZHD (aircraft). I am however not sure whether this is a replica or not, but this data sheet suggests that it is an original aircraft built in 1945. --Julian H. (talk) 14:17, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a replica used for movies when a ww2 era fighter is needed, and lacks a lot of features a genuine P-64 would have, as the wings, engine and other major components are standard T-6 and not the completely different ones from a P-64.NiD.29 (talk) 04:24, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional airworthy aircraft 
Talk:Aqueous Wastes from Petroleum and Petrochemical Plants

message: Rome wasn't built in a day and Wikipedia articles aren't instantaneously linked to articles as soon as they are created. The MarshBot tagged the article as linkless within 1 hour after the page was created. It takes time to find the articles needing linking to an article. It now has 11 articles linked to it, and so I removed the linkless tag. Is there some way to make the MarshBot cognizant of when an article was created  and wait at least 48 hours before tagging it as linkless?? - mbeychok 21:17, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why I removed linkless tag
Talk:Northrop A-17

message: Was the type really used by all those countries? - Aerobird 02:13, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to my sources the answer would be no. --Colputt 14:48, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operators 

message: The section on the Netherlands includes the statement "In his 1975 book on Dutch aviation history Vermetele vliegende Hollanders ("Daring Flying Dutchmen"), Dutch aviation historian and illustrator Thijs Postma incorrectly lists these aircraft as Douglas 8A." - If the book does say this, then it would NOT be incorrect - by the time that The Netherlands ordered its Model 8A-3Ns, Northrop Corporation had become the El Segundo division of Douglas Aircraft, and to quote René Francillon in page 217 of McDonnell Douglas Aircraft since 1920 "...and, consequently, were known as Douglas 8As."Nigel Ish (talk) 17:15, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Netherlands tagging 

message: I removed Lick Observatory from the list. Thank you. Malerooster (talk) 16:33, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: An A-17 crashed into the observatory in 1939. I'm not sure why it wasn't mentioned in this article at all, but it ought be in the body somewhere. I'll see if I can add something there instead, but leave it in the See also section for now. The A-33 is a related, but different, aircraft, so it can be removed there. BilCat (talk) 23:25, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Very good, thank you, --Malerooster (talk) 12:29, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also section
Talk:Northrop HL-10

message: The only evidence that there was ever a plan to fly this in space is a minor source otherwise undocumented. It is one man's fantasy -- more science fiction than real space history. The section should be deleted or greatly reduced in length. 70.215.57.84 (talk) 21:03, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unrealized space flight is a 'tall tale' 

message: Several articles here explain that HL stand for Horizontal Landing. I have read that it stood for Heavy Lifting, to contrast with the M2F2 et al.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:E414:3A01:38EF:CEFA:F7EB:A5E (talk) 06:54, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  HL - what does it mean?
Talk:OKB-1 140

message: It exists still another article (Aircraft 140. --Billyhill (talk) 20:07, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the WP:COMMONNAME would be EF140, though. - The Bushranger One ping only 20:18, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Opel RAK.1

message: Re: Legacy and importance of Opel RAK for the history of spaceflight
The first flight of the Opel RAK.1 was on September 30, 1929, says the article.
It also says: "The German Reich was first to test the approach in August 1929 when a battery of solid rocket propellants supported a Junkers Ju-33 seaplane to get airborne."
August is before September, i.e. before the flight of the Opel RAK.1 --- can it be a legacy if it came first?
Also: Citation Needed on that rocket-assisted take-off of the Ju-33.
I understand the Ju-33 could change between a fixed wheel carriage (using the tail wheel) or a pair of floats (says Wikipedia) --- so that would be "in a floatplane (or seaplane) configuration".
86.5.188.109 (talk) 16:27, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy and importance ... for events before?
Talk:Orbital Sciences X-34

message: I'm pretty sure the Fastrac was a Lox-Kerosene engine; the article states that the X-34 would have used Lox-LH2.
Secondly, the photo of the X-34 on a tarmac apron is labelled as an impression of the vehicle in orbit. Clearly this is a mistake... Batoom 12:04, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Caption fixed and I found that it burns "a mixture of liquid oxygen and kerosene", I will remove hydrogen and replace it kerosene.Chris H 14:06, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

message: some sad images of their current state. - Rod57 (talk) 15:17, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  History and where they are up to 2019
Talk:Ryan PT-22 Recruit

message: I've seen references to a plane named PT-11 Recruit. Is this a misprint or a real aircraft? Drutt 22:38, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a perfect answer but my reference books do not show that the Consolidated PT-11 had a given name. It was an early 1930s biplane trainer. MilborneOne 22:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: PT-11 Recruit

message: I have moved this page to bring its name into alignment with the convention used on other USAAF/USAAC/USAF pages.NiD.29 (talk) 02:49, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved 

message: Now I am wondering if maybe this page and the page for the Ryan ST should be merged? It isn't like either page is overly long, and the PT-22 was just one version of the ST used for training.NiD.29 (talk) 05:59, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a good question! I think the key question is does it make sense to keep them separate? - Ahunt (talk) 11:24, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: None of them vary much specification-wise - the engine (inline vs radial) was the only real difference. I'll leave it up to you since you're doing all the work but it seems to me they should merged. Certainly I've seen other aircraft pages that had more differences (Stinson Reliant for instance) loaded onto one page than they would be if they were. The Ryan ST page even has a section for the PT-22 already.NiD.29 (talk) 12:56, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: We do seem to have enough text for two article right now, so it is debatable either way. I am kind of on the fence myself, so let's see what other editors have to say. - Ahunt (talk) 13:08, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: OK - sounds good to me.NiD.29 (talk) 13:35, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger? 

message: The "Profile" has a lot more information, but I think the main materials are interesting not only technically, but because they give the very shiny fuselage and duller wings.  My Lotus Seven, for example, cannot attain such a shine, because its surface is hard aluminum alloy.  Alclad has pure (soft) aluminum surfaces that can be shined to a mirror finish and does not corrode quickly.  David R. Ingham (talk) 05:19, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This is typical for US aircraft (Alclad) vs UK aircraft (Birmabright, an aluminium-magnesium alloy). UK aircraft were never as popularly polished as US aircraft were – it's not just the weather that's the reason. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:32, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Construction 

message: Should we add the 5 March 2015 crash of Harrison Ford with his ST3 KR ?  --Stone (talk) 14:48, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No, as it does not meet the inclusion criteria at WP:AIRCRASH. - Ahunt (talk) 14:51, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harrison Ford
Talk:Evelyn Wrench

message: In “Death and Memorial” the text says that Wrench’s funeral took place on 9 December 1966, but the reference for this is dated 24 November 1966, so one of these dates must be wrong. As I do not have a subscription to The Times, I cannot access the article. It would be helpful if somebody who does have such access could check this and rectify the date(s) accordingly.CWO (talk) 22:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem with the date of a reference
Talk:Harry West

message: Since apparently, the two sides are going to edit war unto infinity, this page is protected for a couple weeks (by then, I hope the VK ArbCom will be off and running. SirFozzie 00:15, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Protected

message: Anyone editing this article may be interested to know that this becvame availaible today.  Henry Patterson is an excellent historian.Traditional unionist (talk) 17:31, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving article
Talk:PZL-104 Wilga

message: At least 7 in New Zealand (ZK-PZL - PZQ, ZK-NEV) - 
:G-BWDF crashed in Northants, UK, today with former UKIP leader Nigel Farage on board - .  No doubt he'll be blaming the plane in its capacity as an immigrant from eastern Europe. Mr Larrington (talk) 14:51, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Usage

message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqhI4MeCn1c
203.63.159.144 (talk) 23:34, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video
Talk:PZL M28 Skytruck

message: A good upper-class start-class article, needs a bit of copyediting and more information on non-Polish military service in the text to make it a B-class. - Aerobird Target locked - Fox One! 14:31, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating 

message: As in newer PZL Mielec aircraft, there is no dash between the M and the number. So PZL M28 is correct, while PZL M-28 is not (for both Bryza and Skytruck). However, the plane on which M28 is based, is named An-28 (with dash). Skalee (talk) 21:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name issue 

message: File:M28 Skytruck Góraszka 2 (cropped).JPG|current
File:PZL M28 - U.S. Air Force C-145A inflight from above.jpg|proposed
The current is OK but a little bland, and it doesn't show very well the high aspect ratio wing and twin fin tail, better shown in the proposed picture. The wingtips are a little bit cropped, but it's not that bad.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 11:57, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  main picture
Talk:PZL TS-11 Iskra

message: Can you provide a citation or source for this statement? The Iskra competed as the standard jet trainer for the Warsaw Pact, but due to a political decision, the Czechoslovakian Aero L-29 Delfin was chosen. --84.16.32.115 19:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political decision 
Talk:Percival Prentice

message: The Prentice was designed to be a fully aerobatic trainer and for this reason was stressed to something like +13 Gs. This made it somewhat heavier than normal and hence the complaints about underpowering.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.40.250.40 (talk) 20:17, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Stressing

message: Something doesn't add up. The article states that "Over 370 were delivered to the RAF between 1947 and 1949". O.K., so we should add to that number the 100 Prentices built for the Fuerza Aerea Argentina and the 42 license-built by Hindustan, which brings the total number well over 500.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.163.113.52 (talk) 09:39, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number built
Talk:The Troubles in Enniskillen

message: * 25 November 1981 - Angela D'Arcy, Catholic civilian, was shot by an off-duty member of the British Army while walking on Middletown Street, Enniskillen.
Do we have more information on this? There may more to it, but given that the soldier was off-duty, I would question whether this was part of the "troubles" at all, or just a straightforward murder.86.16.117.32 11:27, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Angela D'Arcy
Talk:Percival Provost

message: According to the article the Percival Provost was the last ever basic trainer operated by the RAF - this is clearly incorrect in some way as the Grob Tutor T1 is still in service as an elementary flight trainer (not to mention the De Havilland Chipmunk and Slingsby Firefly that preceded it). As the Provost was replaced by the Jet Provost, might it mean that the Provost was the last piston engined advanced trainer in RAF service? Jellyfish dave (talk) 14:56, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The Chipmunk had not been used as a trainer in the RAF for a long time and I dont think the civil-operated Fireflies were actually operated by the RAF or used for basic training. Have to agree that the Tutor is used for elementary training but again as civil contract aircraft not strictly operated by the RAF. MilborneOne (talk) 18:14, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say that whilst they're not strictly owned by the RAF, they are certainly operated by the RAF. Jellyfish dave (talk) 17:21, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The use of the Tutor at Cranwell is fairly recent so I suspect the quote is from earlier, and certainly the official fast jet route still starts with the Tucano I believe. Perhaps we can just change it to say it was the last basic trainer until the introduction of the Tutor for elementary training in 20XX. MilborneOne (talk) 18:20, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  The question would be whether the Tutors (and the earlier Fireflies and Bulldogs) count as basis trainers or as something else. As far as I know they are used for "Elementary" training (i.e. pre-basic) and by the University Air Squadrons. Of course, the difference between elementary and basic training may be a bit obscure to the average reader.Nigel Ish (talk) 15:35, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: If it was good enough for the RAF Museum, the official historical body of the RAF, to produce this statement, it should be safe enough to detail in this article. Kyteto (talk) 19:10, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Piston Engined Basic Trainer?