lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Life in Exile After Abdication

message: The article Hey Mersh! has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
:Single songs generally do not meet the requirements of WP:N, no mention of notability no references
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist.  The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:44, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[Hey Mersh!]]
Talk:P. P. Hammer and his Pneumatic Weapon

message: This article and the article Mickey Mouse IV: The Magical Labyrinth make it clear that these are essentially the same game, but with different names and different graphics. On top of that, there are two other games that are also essentially the same. If the same idea for a game has been used four times - once by itself, and three times with different licences - there is no need to create four different articles that only differ by the name of the game. The articles even mention that all four games are basically the same, going as far as to refer to the player character as "Venkman/Mickey/Garfield". JIP | Talk 19:30, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know where the editor who added the "P. P. Hammer" reference got their information, but they are not the same game. They have a similar premise, but other than that there's no crossover between P. P. Hammer and The Real Ghostbusters/Garfield Labyrinth/Mickey Mouse IV. --Hullubulloo (talk) 01:01, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Connie Bea Hope

message: whoever wrote this article, all you did was copy her obituary.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.158.1.254 (talk • contribs) 20:49, 9 March 2007
The newsbank link requires a user id and login password.  This should be removed.  Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 03:40, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Life Is a Grand...

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :My Face"/"Making Love With My Wife and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at  until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 07:41, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "My Face"/"Making Love With My Wife" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Lightning Strikes Twice (album)

message: Hi,
just wanting to know if I can add the genre "glam metal" to this album. Stated as such in the following source "Molly Hatchet makes Lightning Strikes Twice, a total hair band album, forsaking their southern rock roots"
Popoff, Martin. The Big Book of Hair Metal (p. 175). Voyageur Press. Kindle Edition. 
Thanks! AgentKozak (talk) 15:00, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding the genre "glam metal" to this album?
Talk:Like China

message: I changed the genre from Hard Rock to Progressive Rock. It clearly isn't the former. --Mackid1993 (talk) 01:50, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre
Talk:Strider II (1990 video game)

message: Not to kick a hornet's nest, but do you think we should use the Genesis cover instead, or just leave it as it is? Scion, LSCM Webmaster (talk) 17:18, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I took the liberty of replacing it with an ad for the computer versions, which uses the cover illustration of those versions. The computer versions technically came out first anyway and should've slight priority. Jonny2x4 (talk) 05:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: BWAHAHAHA! As if this game didn't get humiliated enough by the linked reviews, you went and put THAT up. Well played. Scion, LSCM Webmaster (talk) 08:57, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover art? 

message: Anyone happen to know the staff list for this game? I have looked in manuals, after the endgame, and in every conceivable location. All I have found is what random staff can be inferred from their discussion group on Facebook and the Amiga port's credits. Anyone else have better luck? Scion, LSCM Webmaster (talk) 09:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Staff 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved  User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 10:47, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 February 2021
Talk:Listen to the Band (album)

message: The track listing template for disc 2 will not format correctly. I've gone over it with a fine tooth comb and cannot find any error in the way I've entered the data, but it's entirely possible that I'm overlooking something. Please help!
The Keymaster (talk) 10:21, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've fixed this for you - there was a link embedded within the template which was not closed with the necessary ]]. See diff. [stwalkerster|talk] 15:49, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks so much. It took me about two hours to insert all those tracks into the template and that error was driving me crazy.The Keymaster (talk) 08:47, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Track listing template error
Talk:I'm a Flirt

message: This may sound like a stupid question, but why is there a remix of this song when Bow Wow isn't even on it? Peecee1978 03:13, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it wasn't Bow Wow's decision. His label wanted "Outta My System" released instead, so he signed it back over to R. Kelly so that the song could be released as a single. Bow Wow still retained his publishing rights though. I think it was a very smart move. ≈Alessandro ♫ T • C   16:19, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Biker culture

message: What in the world is with this article? It's not written in a proper style at all, but instead appears to be one person's semi-literate and somewhat unhinged rant. The Victorian era as medieval? The industrial revolution and the Luddites? Art Nouveau? WTF???? Alinnyc 22:19, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Remington Rand

message: I am a student from West Chester University and I have been assigned to work on this article for one of my courses. For the past two months I have been looking at sources from the World Wide Web and the Hagley Digital Collections, and I will be evaluating these sources to see what important information I can contribute to this article.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyod1694 (talk • contribs) 02:26, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The section summarizing the strike is written in an extremely unencyclopedic, informal tone, unlike the main article on the strike. I have accordingly added the tone template to the section. 1980fast (talk) 19:51, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strike section needs an encyclopedic rewrite 

message: I have a very old folder with the company stamp. If you guys interested please call 973-851-3599 24.228.237.54 (talk) 21:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have a very old folder with the company stamp
Talk:Graph pebbling

message: ..."after a series of pebbling moves, it is possible to move a pebble to any vertex in the graph."
Does this mean to make it so that each vertex has at least one pebble?
If not, then I don't understand the 2 nodes 1 edge example. If we start with 1 pebble on each node we can't move any pebble? --anon
:The challenge is, more accurately, to reach every vertex.  If we start with a pebble on a vertex, we have already reached that vertex. --AaronRosenberg 19:58, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Does this mean...

message: Why is this note still there?  Is there really still insufficient context for this page?  I'll grant that it needs to be linked more thoroughly, but the page itself is sound in my opinion. --AaronRosenberg 19:58, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Insufficient Context Note

message: In the --γ(G) for families of graphs-- section, the formula is incorrect for wheel graphs of n vertices (\scriptstyle K_4 is isomorphic to \scriptstyle W_4, yet the covering numbers are different), although it might be correct for wheel graphs of n+1 vertices. I think the problem lies in the inconsistent numerical notation for wheel graphs. I don't have the knowledge to judge whether the formula is wrong just in the \scriptstyle n=4 case or in any general case.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.15.69.60 (talk) 17:58, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This was fixed in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Graph_pebbling&diff=prev&oldid=646524752. - Patrick (talk) 08:54, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  incorrect formula

message: Any kind of visual reference would be nice. 2604:3D08:497F:F430:686E:35E:4941:322B (talk) 21:23, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a Picture
Talk:Nigger guy

message: does this require its own article? I mean, it's only mentioned in that episode.
Agreed. Should be deleted. --76.64.79.166 02:17, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: is this really needed?

message: This should simply redirect to the South Park episode article. - 75.19.63.116 23:36, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why not redirect?
Talk:Maai

message: This article was placed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Buddhism, based on its inclusion in :Category:Zen. I don't think that either is appropriate, what is the consensus about this? —Leo Laursen ( T | C ) 13:34, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now removed template WikiProject Buddhism.—Leo Laursen ( T ¦ C ) 06:22, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maai and Zen 

message: Someone put this in the article. Not knowing Japanese, I can't vouch for its accuracy, but if it is, can anyone correct the article as needed?
:Maai (間合い?), translating simply to "interval", IS NOT REALLY CORRECT:
:Ma ai means: Ma means space and time. 
:Ai, means to join, to fit together, meeting or harmony. 
:Maai, means the effective, harmonius, or proper distance.
--Luxdormiens (talk) 06:52, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Its (Ma)(A)I, so basically "Proper Distancing" would be the better form for the term in English as it refers to the Proper Distance To Land A Strike or an Effective Technique but that is a mouthful as far as a concept goes. 2001:14BA:6212:B400:5C87:BCFA:816D:B02C (talk) 05:17, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Proper Distancing/Spacing rather either one works as its a descriptive term. 2001:14BA:6212:B400:5C87:BCFA:816D:B02C (talk) 05:18, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correctness of translation
Talk:Silver Jubilee Government Degree College

message: my name is janardhan kompally,  very happy to see all of u,  i am student of silver jubille 1991 to 1996.i am doing real estate in hyderabad.  for more infirmation
my mail id ijanardhan@yahoo.com        mobile no 91 9246545022   plz log on   www.sjgcfraternity.org.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.245.8.225 (talk) 15:44, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not a forum for college alumni. Do not engage in such editing.Kumarrao (talk) 13:15, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Can someone place a photo of the college.Kumarrao (talk) 09:48, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Live at the El Rey (EP)

message: Why EP ? 33 minutes is more than an EP surely ? -- Beardo 05:11, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Live at the Fillmore East (Neil Young album)

message: In the last few seconds of the last track "Cowgirl in the Sand" James Taylor can be heard singing his famous song "Sweet Baby James".It can be included as an interesting fact about the album.88.242.104.122 (talk) 18:25, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: James Taylor?
Template talk:Richmond, California

message: ----
Fluvious Innominatus creek seems bogus. Never heard of it. The only online references to it are copies of this template info.
Fizbin 21:10, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No it's not at all bogus, very strange name, haven't figured out why its called that yet but CA Museum of History website shows it on maps and I have seen it in person, its visable fron Interstate 80, just never knew the name, I think it goes nameless for most people as many creeks and definatly a lot of the sources are still unamed in this area since they are hidden in peoples yards or in tiny streches connected by culverts and some where originally seasonal like wadis or didnt ever make it to the bay.Cholga is a SUPERSTAR¡Talk2Cholga!Sexy Contribs 22:13, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Live at Wood Hall

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/154.5.173.129 ... Conflict of interest? In ictu oculi (talk) 16:22, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Albums redirected then restored by Vancouver IP
Talk:Ging̱olx

message: re this, it's easy enough to google "Gingolx pronunciation" and find it; I don't see an IPA but at least one of those results has a pronunciation audio file; there's various approximations in English non-IPA spellings; what I do know is the 'x' is 'ch' like in "loch".  As with so many instances of editors cruising by an article and adding "go find this templates" (be it a pronunciation or an actual ref in need) there seems to be too much of a habit of people doing little more than templates asking other people to do things they can easily do themselves, if they weren't in a hurry to move onto another article to drop yet another template to "delegate" someone else to do what they couldn't be bothered to do themselves.  This isn't an issue of WP:AGF about another editor's activity, but a comment on the whole scope and attitude of Wikipedia user-dom; why not improve the article yourself, and learn something in the process, instead of "patrolling" for missing refs/pronunciations/whatever.  I don't have the time today myself, and am at the moment doing research on several other FN pages in need of expanding/citation...... but I'm constantly amazed at how easy it is to find what is asked for, and amazed at how few other regular editors actually go get it and put it in t he article themselves instead of expecting others to do it for them.  And people wonder why I"m bitchy, sheesh....Skookum1 (talk) 23:29, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You have a point. Thanks. Indefatigable (talk) 16:51, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  addition of pronunciation tag
Talk:Live in Europe (Rory Gallagher album)

message: The current article says "Live in Europe is considered by many critics to be a landmark live recording," but there is no reference. It actually sounds like a reasonable thing to say but I can't recall a critic ever saying it. If someone knows please post the ref in the article or leave a note here or on my talk page but if I can't find a reference I'm going to delete that claim. Mdebellis (talk) 21:21, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Landmark Recording Claim Needs Reference 

message: The text seems to imply he used his Stratocaster for the last song of the original album "Bullfrog Blues", after playing the mandolin. Is there any source for that? Because on all filmed live recordings I know, he is seen playing this song on a different electric guitar, like a Telecaster in the early 70s. Example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZJNxW8zt-k
2A02:8109:8980:3DF8:3158:1CF5:1233:5AC5 (talk) 05:16, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I just looked at the Irish Tour video and I think Internet user is correct, Gallagher is playing a white guitar on Bullfrog blues not the famous beat up strat he was using before the acoustic part of the concert. In my opinion its better to be conservative though and just say something like "he returns to the electric guitar" rather than mention the strat or the kind of guitar without a reference that says for sure one way or the other. But I definitely think it should be changed and not refer to the strat.  --MadScientistX11 (talk) 20:46, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bullfrog Blues Guitar?
Talk:Walter Anderson (RAF officer, died 1959)

message: According to the London Gazette - http://www.rafweb.org/GC_holders.htm - he originally received a MBE and at some point was no doubt given the option to convert to a GC Gbawden (talk) 10:26, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  GC 
Talk:Epichlorohydrin

message: Epichlorohydrine is a chiral compound and exists in pure enantiomeric forms -  R(-) CAS Nr. [67843-74-7] and S(+) CAS Nr. [51594-55-9], as well as a racemate, CAS Nr. [106-89-8]. One should elaborate this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.110.241.125 (talk) 00:33, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chirality 

message: Part of the edit-summary for this edit, which added a comment that the called "epichlorohydrin" is not a "chlorohydrin", notes "Does anyone understand why it is called epichlorohydrin?" Something like that might be mentioned in the early literature that mentions this compound. The early history of it is completely absent from our article (when was it first discovered/synthesized and why, etc.). DMacks (talk) 08:22, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the oldest refs in SciFinder for this chemical, it appears that the name parses approximately as "epi...hydrin". That is, it's like a ...hydrin, but the epoxide derivative/analog thereof. Best very-old-ref I see is doi:10.1021/ja02071a003 (1898, by which time this various epi...hydrin chemicals were already known). It has 1-chloro-2,3-dihydroxypropane as "monochlorohydrin" and 1-thiocyano-2,3-dihydroxypropane as "α-thiocyanhydrin" (and various other thiocyanohydrins similarly), and then 1-thiocyano-2,3-epoxypropane as an "epithiocyanhydrin". DMacks (talk) 18:10, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of compound and its name
Talk:Ethyl methylphenylglycidate

message: Ethyl methylphenylglycidate is no longer used in most produces. It iritats skin and bures the eyes. It is also used in cigerets. Why it is use is only known to the cigeret companys.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.238.244.137 (talk) 21:24, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  toxic
Talk:Fenchone

message: First, the problem(s), then suggested improvements.
===The problems===
One doesn’t have to look far to notice that there’s more than one fenchone, for example, l-fenchone. Nobody I can find wants to talk about the fenchone class. And “fenchones” isn’t even a word, not to google, not to any of the OneLook dictionaries, not to CHEBI, PubChem, the NIST Chemistry WebBook, Sigma Aldrich (aka Millipore Sigma), PubChem, ChEBI, or World Of Chemicals. What a bizarre contrast to the word "alcohols"! 
Adding insult to injury, the PubChem article on d-fenchone chirps “(1S,4R)-fenchone is a fenchone …,” proving that they do know there's more than one fenchone, but the links to “fenchone” go not to the fenchone class but to fenchone itself.
A related problem is that each fenchone has a disturbing multiplicity of names, and many supposedly credible sources are happy to intermingle alternate names for a fenchone with synonyms in the more general sense of having a similar meaning. 
Finally, there seems to be general agreement that DL-fenchone is an alternate name for fenchone. Problem is, there also seems to be general agreement that fenchone, i.e., DL-fenchone is a "compound." That's a problem because every other DL-whatever is a mixture of two different compounds, namely d-whatever and l-whatever. 
===Suggested improvements===
# List common alternate names for the fenchone of this article including dl-fenchone and (±)-Fenchone.
# Go ahead and admit that DL-fenchone is any mixture (not necessarily racemic) of d-fenchone and l-fenchone (or else explain why the heck it isn't).
# Mention that other common names for d-fenchone are (+)-Fenchone and (1S,4R)-fenchone,  also that other common names for l-fenchone are (-)-Fenchone and (1R,4S)-fenchone (assuming I've actually got this right).
Page Notes (talk) 14:33, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Since you see "problems" and you dont know anybody who "wants to talk" about this stuff, take a stab and do what you are recommended, otherwise your advice seems arrogant "Go ahead and admit.." "disturbing multiplicity of names" [we call that chemistry]]. --Smokefoot (talk) 14:51, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many fenchones are there? 

message: # List common alternate names for the fenchone of this article including dl-fenchone and (±)-Fenchone.
# Go ahead and admit that DL-fenchone is any mixture (not necessarily racemic) of d-fenchone and l-fenchone (or else explain why the heck it isn't).
# Mention that other common names for d-fenchone are (+)-Fenchone and (1S,4R)-fenchone,  also that other common names for l-fenchone are (-)-Fenchone and (1R,4S)-fenchone (assuming I've actually got this right).
Page Notes (talk) 14:33, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Since you see "problems" and you dont know anybody who "wants to talk" about this stuff, take a stab and do what you are recommended, otherwise your advice seems arrogant "Go ahead and admit.." "disturbing multiplicity of names" [we call that chemistry]]. --Smokefoot (talk) 14:51, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested improvements
Talk:Enanthic acid

message: I recently reverted (and re-reverted) this edit to the article, which was sourced to a wikipedia user page. Per WP:RS, we need reliable sources for content that we include, and a wikipedia user page is not a reliable source. At absolutely best, it might be a self published, primary source, or a questionable source. We need a reliable secondary one instead. I'm happy to discuss further, but as of yet this doesn't meet our standards for sourcing. Thanks!   — Jess· Δ♥ 16:45, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Removing the content as you did was the appropriate thing to do.  The content describes chemistry that is dubious (at best).  The synthesis of hexane from heptanoic acid is impractical, plant sources of heptanoic acid will never be "helpful in solving energy/fuel crisis", and claims about combustion are inaccurate.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:53, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

text: Please see WP:V. The threshold for inclusion is verifiability, not truth. In other words, it doesn't matter if you are correct, it only matters if we can source the content to a reliable secondary source that meets WP:RS. You'll need to find a high quality source to include that content. Thanks!   — Jess· Δ♥ 17:42, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

text: Schicagos, on Wikipedia "me" is not a reliable source. If you're the first one to propose this way of hexane production (and that's what it looks like), this falls under original research. Wikipedia doesn't publish original thought, so until this production method is published in scientific journals, it doesn't belong in this article. --Six words (talk) 19:10, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent reverts 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :1-Hexane carboxylic acid. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 15#1-Hexane carboxylic acid until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Mdewman6 (talk) 20:56, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "1-Hexane carboxylic acid" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]