Talk:The Myth of Hitler's Pope

message: I've just removed the sentence:
"Conversely, the Nazis detested the pope."
The reason I have done this is because there were no citations provided; the statement doesn't tell us which Nazis are being referred to, nor why they would detest the pope. It seems especially unlikely when we look at the concordat signed by the pope and see that the terms of that agreement had a number of sections which were very favourable towards Roman Catholicism:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichskonkordat#Terms_and_violations  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.78.122.247 (talk) 21:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Very one sided piece

message: IMHO petty and premature to delete the sentence "Conversely, the Nazis detested the pope." because there is plenty of evidence for it:  Eugenio Pacelli (later Pius XII) was the main author of the papal encyclical [["Mit brennender Sorge"]http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pius_XII.#.E2.80.9EMit_brennender_Sorge.E2.80.9C] ("With burning anxiety") which severely criticized the Nazis and their supremacist ideology.  It was smuggled into Germany and read in churches simultaneously in March 1937.  The Nazis were enraged and took revenge by imprisoning and torturing many who had been involved in its dissemination, so it's hard to believe they didn't detest the author(s). The Nazis also took the unprecedented step of trying to prevent the possible election of Pacelli in 1939 by sending an emissary, on the occasion of Pius XI's death, to state that Germany would view his election very unfavorably (The response of the College of Cardinals was to elect Pacelli in an unusually short conclave).
A Concordat is simply a framework agreement to allow the Catholic Church to operate (churches, convents, schools, charities etc.) freely in a country, so it shouldn't be surprising if it contains sections which are "very favourable towards Roman Catholicism"!  It also placed social obligations on the Nazi regime - which the Nazis repeatedly violated (e.g. by their sterilization programs) despite Church protests.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.39.218.10 (talk) 10:54, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Put the line back! 

message: :Image:MythHitlersPope.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:MythHitlersPope.jpg

message: The reviews section only cites to reviews which are highly biased against the book, hardly the consensus of reviews. Mamalujo (talk) 22:46, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: POV tag on Reviews section

message: Great Material. This is the service of truth that Wikipedia offers to its readers. Great Job  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.104.181.248 (talk) 01:29, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&u=googlescholar&id=GALE|A148278043&v=2.1&it=r&sid=AONE&asid=392f34be Einstein never said the quote 94.110.113.219 (talk) 19:47, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Einstein/Content

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Myth of Hitler's Pope. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110610005209/http://www.firstthings.com/article/2008/12/001-the-end-of-the-pius-wars-1 to http://www.firstthings.com/article/2008/12/001-the-end-of-the-pius-wars-1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:58, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: According to Einstein himself the quote was never his: 
Sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_and_philosophical_views_of_Albert_Einstein#:~:text=I%20never%20had%20any%20special,despised%20I%20now%20praise%20unreservedly.
https://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/06-01-05/ 94.110.113.219 (talk) 19:50, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Einstein Quote is false