Talk:Kumiki Gibson

message: I've tagged the article as non-notable. Please at least tell us in the opening sentence what she is notable for. Thanks. Steve Dufour (talk) 20:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the notability has not been clearly stated in the opening sentence, but I suppose that there is some notability given, because a) she served in the american government c) she also served in several local government organisations c) she has had a lot of newspaper reports written about her. Unfortunatelly, I'm not at all an expert on this subject, I was merelly attracted to this article due to an edit-war. --PaterMcFly (talk) 21:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: She might be notable.  However what the article does now is just list some jobs she has done, with some criticism and praise thrown in. There is no overall story about her. Steve Dufour (talk) 22:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  You're right, but as I said, I'm probably the wrong guy to fix this. Let's maybe ask those who started the edit-war previously in this article? --PaterMcFly (talk) 07:07, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable

message: Please block any edits to this page by anyone who has not disputed a block, OR delete the page entirely.  After you unblocked & the page was updated (o to remove the libelous and inaccurate statements), someone revised to include the libelous statements.  Please block him/her from any further edits OR just remove the page entirely for lack of notability (see above).  If the page remains, it cannot be used to perpetuate libelous statements and must be accurate and current.  Thank you.  08:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've nominated the article for deletion. Because there's really little visible notability, all this edit-warring is really not worth it. --PaterMcFly (talk) 18:04, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit War 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Kumiki Gibson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071010082439/http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/counsellists/cl539-1a.html to http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/counsellists/cl539-1a.html
*Added  tag to http://www.state.ny.us/appointments/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713072854/http://www.jacksonlewis.com/legalupdates/article.cfm?aid=1301 to http://www.jacksonlewis.com/legalupdates/article.cfm?aid=1301
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080429080356/http://www.state.ny.us/governor/press/press_0408082.html to http://www.state.ny.us/governor/press/press_0408082.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080531174940/http://www.dccouncil.washington.dc.us/EVANS/newsletter/Week.of.04.30.04.htm to http://www.dccouncil.washington.dc.us/EVANS/newsletter/Week.of.04.30.04.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:41, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified