lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pizmonim

message: I have deleted the section (and external link) for the Pizmon a-cappella group from Columbia, Barnard, and the Jewish Theological Seminary. Aside from the word "pizmon", it has absolutely nothing to do with the Jewish-Arab musical genre of Pizmonim. If you peruse their website (http://www.pizmon.org/index.html), you will see that they do not sing any pizmonim. What they DO sing includes "Israeli rock and pop, English parodies, Yiddish classics, and children's songs." As is obvious, they should not be featured in the Wikipedia entry for Pizmonim. It seems that whoever included the section for this a-cappella ensemble did so only for promotional purposes.
-----------------------------   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.216.206.177 (talk) 22:32, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pizmon: Misleading entry 

message: Can we move the page to Pizmon? TewfikTalk 05:53, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Grammatically it would make better sense, but in the interests of accessibility I'd rather not.  When I think of the developed Syrian tradition, I automatically think of "pizmonim", and anyone trying to find out about them would tend to search under that title.  "Pizmon" only makes me think of the heading for that very long piyyut about the Esther story that we sing on Shabbat Zachor (or maybe "El Nora Alilah" on Ereb Kippur). --Sir Myles na Gopaleen (the da) 14:35, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pizmon 

message: why did you remove the "Sephardic Press" link?  I know that it is a commercial site, but I added it because it is equally possible to order pizmonim CDs from this site and from the Shrem project site.  Naturally, as the person organizing the Shrem project, you do not want to promote a competitor, but that is not a legitimate reason for Wikipedia purposes: in the interests of neutrality we should have both or neither.  If there is an objective reason for omitting the Sephardic Press reference, I would be interested to know. --Sir Myles na Gopaleen (the da) 09:27, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: Please help translate David Betesh 14:55, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation
Talk:Lexington Market

message: I cannot believe that crabcakes do not have an article here...I will poke around some for them. Kukini 16:04, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Got it. Kukini 16:06, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Crabcakes

message: I've removed the content of the History section, as it appeared to be cut'n'pasted from http://www.lexingtonmarket.com/History.html and successive pages  there during a series of edits by User:Rick Martell back in May 2006. I don't really know which came first or if both are copied from some hidden other source, but from the writing style, it would seem that the original was not an encyclopedia. DMacks (talk) 03:36, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Wayback Machine's first archive of that History.html page is from 2006-05-02, which both contains the text in question and predates when that content appeared on Wikipedia (2006-05-12). Looks like ours definitely was not the original. Someone wanna write a new and non-copyright-infringing history of the Market? DMacks (talk) 17:46, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "History" section copyright concern 

message: Berger cookies, being a local delicacy and regional favorite for many years, deserve their own page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.96.146.37 (talk) 03:41, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Berger cookies 
Category talk:Fictional amputees

message: Vash the Stampede and Million Knives from Trigun
Sesshoumaru from InuYasha
:Done for Sesshowhasisname, Vash and Millions Knives were already in the sister category :Category:Fictional cyborgs. -- nae'blis (talk) 19:43, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional fictional amputees 

message: Why is Dave Lister listed under fictional amputees? His arm grew back an episode later. The Doctor from Doctor Who isn't listed under fictional amputees just because he got his hand cut off in that Christmas special. Is it supposed to be any fictional character who's had something amputated, or people who are missing limbs?
76.189.99.150 07:28, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dave Lister 

message: Does this category also apply to a character who ever lost a limb? 2605:E000:2E52:FA00:C9D9:7A3B:1D9F:BA9C (talk) 14:31, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Experience 

message: In the Future Trunks special, Future Gohan lost his arm during one of his fights with the Future Androids #17 and #18 while attempting to protect a young Future Trunks. This was a permanent loss of his arm, so he should be classified as an amputee. However, this shouldn't be confused with Present Gohan who took a blast from Cell and left his arm immobilized. 198.41.70.145 (talk) 12:47, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is Future Gohan from Dragon Ball Z? This could also go under additional fictional amputees.
Talk:Day of Judgment (comics)

message: The title spells it "judgment" but it appears within the body text as "judgement".  Both are valid spellings of the word; which one is the actual title of the comic?  The article Sentinels of Magic, which links here, suffers from a similar problem: the visible link text has it as "judgement" but the link value has to be "judgment" in order to link to this article.  This would seem to indicate that "judgement" is the correct spelling, and since that is the dominant form in the US and DC is a US company... Canonblack 00:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct spelling?
Talk:Bend radius

message: someone forgot the diagram . . . 68.115.227.253 16:29, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is the bend radius the maximum radius? The maximum radius is infinity which is a straight line. Oblomov99 (talk) 04:15, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maximum bend radius 

message: Bend radius seems more complex than this. If I bend a rod into a circle, the length of the rod is not the same as the circumference of the inside or the outside of the circle. It will not be the average of the two either, because the outside of the rod will stretch more easily than the inside of the rod will compress. I postulate that there is an 'effective circumference' that defines where inside the rod the resulting circumference will be. It seems to be different for different metals and materials, like rubber hoses. "The Fabricator" gives formulas for this. Can anyone help with this? John (talk) https://www.thefabricator.com/thefabricator/article/bending/bending-basics-how-the-inside-bend-radius-forms  03:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bend Allowance
Talk:Bhikaiji Cama

message: I think there is a mistake. She was born in present day Mumbai.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:201:8006:D9F7:700E:F05A:2AF5:BA7A (talk) 16:02, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

message: Where is the source for her being a Parsi? I can't see it. - Sitush (talk) 07:48, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This is an old question, but just to give it closure: You can look up Bhikaiji Cama on Britannica.com. (I’m not sure if it’s allowed to insert external URLs here, so I’m just doing it this way.)--Geke (talk) 06:16, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parsi
Talk:The Pondus Penguin

message: Pasted from Emperor Penguin:
  
:The Emperor Penguin is also the species of penguin represented by the popular character Pondus, an image found on various paraphernalia in many retail stores throughout the country. Pondus originates in Danish children's books written and photographed by Ivar Myrhøj and published by publisher Lademann in the late 1960s. The character has received cult worship in Canada in the Naughties both for being without purpose and being an emperor penguin.
Samsara (talk • contribs) 16:45, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:You're So Cool (manhwa)

message: The article is not wikified or coherent for that matter. Just by looking at it, it is evident that it needs to be rewritten.--Zouf 16:47, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for rewrite

message: It's also the title of a famous Hans Zimmer score track: "You're so cool!" is the title song from the movie True Romance. See/listen http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ab1l2TwFp8 --80.130.207.162 (talk) 20:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation? 
Category talk:Koch family

message: Why are User:MBMadmirer/David H. Koch and User:LibertarianLuvr/David-Koch listed here?  209.255.78.138 (talk) 18:57, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: They seem to be temporary copies of the targeted article (David H. Koch).  Categories need to be commented out of userfied articles.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 20:04, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Speaking as one of those two people, I don't think that they should be there. My text is a copy to demonstrate proposed edits. I believe that they should be removed. MBMadmirer (talk) 23:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest that this is a candidate for CfD - it has unrelated items in it, and does not follow any normal rule for categorization of people. Collect (talk) 19:05, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are [[User:MBMadmirer/David H. Koch]] and [[User:LibertarianLuvr/David-Koch]] listed here?
Talk:Metastability in the brain

message: The article does not provide a clear definition of metastability. It discusses many loosely related concepts in neural dynamics and contains a number of errors. Expert needed to verify the content. Some of the content is discussed elsewhere, e.g., HKB model in motor coordination. TjeerdB (talk) 11:17, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple issues 

message: Please explain it.
It only occurs once, but DCH occurs several times.
Burressd (talk) 13:19, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  DC is not defined.
Talk:Lake Springfield

message: Is this zoo notable enough for an article?  It's currently red-linked.  It didn't impress me as all that notable, but I'm not familiar with notaiblity standards for zoos.  Should we remove the redlink?  Rklawton 15:16, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed for now.  If someone wants to write an article about it it can be re-linked.Bigturtle 15:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wrote a brief article on the Henson Robinson Zoo and restored the link.   Bigturtle (talk) 00:33, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Henson Robinson Zoo
Talk:Lametasaurus

message: Lametasaurus is considered a ceratosaur (as per Wilson et. al. 2003, Carrano and Sampson 2008, and Novas et. al. 2010) or an ankylosaur (as per Maidment, 2010). However, Carrano and Sampson (2008) do not rule out the possibility that the dermal scutes of Lametasaurus, while similar to the osteoderms of titanosaurs, may also represent ceratosaur dermal ossifications, but whether these scutes are titanosaurian or ceratosaurian requires a histological examination (if the holotype is ever relocated). In summary, the majority of authors cited above are leaning towards the consensus that Lametasaurus is an abelisaurid.
Why isn't this information in the article? Also, everywhere I have seen has said that Lametasaurus is a ceratosaur.Zurbs58 (talk) 13:45, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but aren't you forgetting Walker designated the scutes as the lectotype? Only if it could be proven that the scutes belong to the hindlimb material — and this seems impossible to prove — opinions about the postcranial skeleton become relevant to the taxonomic status of Lametasaurus.--MWAK (talk) 06:58, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification of Lametasaurus
Talk:Bill Kelly (politician)

message: :I looked at the brief bio on the subject's campaign site, but it contains very little. Are there any better sources? Also, there's no mention of his military service, but he's categorized as a veteran. -Will Beback 22:15, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Laosaurus

message: Galton (2006) didn't address the status of Laosaurus gracilis, so it's possible that it is congeneric with Laosaurus as first named, if Galton can re-examine the holotype of L. gracilis, YPM 1875.
:Galton (1983) had previously assigned L. gracilis to Othneilia consor (=Othneilosaurus consor Galton 2007). Carpenter and Galton (2018) more recently assigned Othneilosaurus consor to Nanosaurus agilis. References Carpenter, K., and Galton, P.M., A photo documentation of bipedal ornithischian dinosaurs from the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, USA: Geology of the Intermountain West, v. 5, p. 167–207. Galton, P.M., 1983, The cranial anatomy of Dryosaurus, a hypsilophodontid dinosaur from the Upper Jurassic of North America and East Africa, with a review of hypsilophodontids from the Upper Jurassic of North America: Geologica et Palaeontologica, v. 17, p. 207–243. Carpenter, Kenneth (talk) 01:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laosaurus gracilis 

message: The image of the pubis is that of Triceratops porosus (figure 4, Plate 79, Dinosaurs of North America). The pubis of "Laosaurus" is figure 1, Plate 79, Dinosaurs of North America. Carpenter, Kenneth (talk) 01:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: pubis
Talk:Lapparentosaurus

message: The holotype of Bothriospondylus madagascariensis is NHMUK R2598 with the referred specimens being NHMUK R2596, NHMUK R2597, NHMUK R2599-R2615, NHMUK R16588, and NHMUK R16589 (Mannion 2010). To be on the safe side, the true Bothriospondylus madagascariensis is a derived non-neosauropod eusauropod, whereas Lapparentosaurus is a titanosauriform, as summarized by Mannion (2010), suggesting that sauropod diversity in Middle Jurassic Madagascar was greater than previously thought.
Mannion, P.D., 2010 "A revision of the sauropod dinosaur genus 'Bothriospondylus' with a redescription of the type material of the middle Jurassic form 'B. madagascariensis'", Palaeontology, 53(2): 277–29668.4.61.168 (talk) 23:57, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bothriospondylus madagascariensis type
Talk:Stathmin

message: In addition to being repetitive, the Introduction and Function sections of this page dominantly consist of general information that is adjacent, too general-purpose to communicate much about this specific, relatively obscure protein.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidB256 (talk • contribs) 02:56, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Concerns about extraneous information

message: The "other Functions" section says "we conclude" strongly indicating that this was copied from one of the references. This may result in a plagiarism problem.
amulekii
: It's from: G.P. Shumyatsky, G. Malleret, R.M. Shin, S. Takizawa, K. Tully, E. Tsvetkov, S.S. Zakharenko, J. Joseph, S. Vronskaya and D. Yin et al., stathmin, a gene enriched in the amygdala, controls both learned and innate fear, Cell 123 (2005), pp. 697–709.
: I removed the offending material, but this would probably be a good source to expand the article. --Gimme danger 05:12, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Titan (Baxter novel)

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:Alternate Titan Stephen Baxter.jpg, found on :Titan (Stephen Baxter novel), has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 17:22, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
Talk:Moonseed (novel)

message: Having read this book and seen that film, I'm not sure Apollo 18 (film) is a particularly relevant link. They both include the alternate history premise that the Apollo 18 mission went ahead as planned, but that's the only thing they have in common. And, in both cases, the Apollo mission serves as little more than a MacGuffin to set events in motion. The movie is a claustrophobic found-footage horror about aliens on the Moon, whereas Moonseed is about a catastrophic global event that ultimately destroys Earth. If there are to be links to other fiction in this section, I believe Apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic fiction movies or novels would be more appropriate.
Additionally, I have added a few links to this section based on some of the more prevalent themes in the book; 
* Geology of the Moon - something that the novel goes into almost painful detail on at times. 
* Terraforming of the Moon - a major subplot of the latter half of the novel is concerned with humanity embarking on a rushed effort to make the Moon habitable.
* Apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic fiction - for obvious reason.
John Bullock (talk) 10:59, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  See Also Section
Talk:Traces (book)

message: Couldn't we reference this book using another term than "trace"! Maybe: "Trace (Novel)". I find it indeed paradoxal that a concept such as trace in being "canibalized" by the name of a novel! I have nothing against this novel, but when I thing about the term "trace", I do not associate the semantic to this Novel, and actually I do not want to. This is exectly the same when a term is "canibalized" by a Rock Band! Maybe some kind of namespace should be introduced in some way Nabeth (talk) 15:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

message: I'm not sure how one would go about sourcing this (bookstores count?), but could the description of what this novel is be expanded upon? At the moment the article is more concerned with the fact that Traces isn't part of one of Baxter's other series' than it is with what Traces is actually about. As per book itself;
 John Bullock (talk) 10:16, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Detailed Description
Talk:Jaibhan Singh Pawaiya

message: J S Pawaiya belongs to Bajrang Dal. That is why the link to the HU site was put there. (HU is the official site of Bajrang Dal USA).—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Anandks007 (talk • contribs).
:Definitely not. HU links will do nothing but smear "fanatic" all over this article. Links from Rediff, the Lok Sabha, even the Organiser are ok, but HU is out of the question.Bakaman 20:50, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No... BJP and VHP links won't work. 
Talk:Lurdusaurus

message: Moving this to Talk --
- Contemporaneous dinosaurs -
Lurdusaurus was contemporaenous with the bizarre large theropod Suchomimus, which some believe to be synonymous with the slightly earlier Baryonyx from England, and with the sympatric Ouranosaurus, notable for its tall-spined vertebrae. The remains of an as-yet unnamed allosauroid theropod have also been found in the Aptian of Niger. Other contemporaneous dinosaurs (not known from the same location as Lurdusaurus) include the large allosauroid theropod Acrocanthosaurus, known to have had tall-spined vertebrae, the basal iguanodont Tenontosaurus, the dromaeosaurid Deinonychus and the large nodosaurid ankylosaur Sauropelta, all from North America, the basal iguanodont Muttaburrasaurus, the large-eyed basal ornithopod Leaellynasaura and a possible genus of allosauroid known only from an astragalus, all from Australia, and yet another basal iguanodont, Probactrosaurus, the primitive ceratopsian Psittacosaurus and the poorly known and taxonomically problematic large theropod Chilantaisaurus, all from East Asia.
-- Doesn't seem appropriate to include this list of various other dinosaurs in the article, especially considering that many of these aren't even from same area as Lurdusaurus. -- 201.37.230.43 (talk) 06:42, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a good point. Probably we can do better than this; I like the suggestion of adding fauna which  Lurdusaurus would actually have interacted with. Firsfron of Ronchester 08:32, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That, specifically, seems reasonable to me. -- 201.37.230.43 (talk) 18:20, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Stuff like that is usually put into a paleoecology section, like here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albertosaurus#Paleoecology FunkMonk (talk) 18:42, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: List of contemporaneous dinosaurs moved to Talk
Talk:Lusotitan

message: I was just checking Mannion et al. (2013) for the phylogeny (for use on Europasaurus) and I noticed something very significant. The paper is now licensed as CC-BY 4.0, as well as open access. Just to make sure I'm not crazy, does anyone else see the " Open Access  Creative Commons" at the top of the page directly above the paper title? http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/zoj.12029/full IJReid  01:02, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  CC-BY 4.0 license of Mannion et al 2013?
Talk:Mandschurosaurus

message: The website says in 1970s more fossils of M.amurensis had been assigned is that true? Is it still a valid taxon, it had been debated as a dubious taxon by many authors, i don't know where's the holotype then, I hope in 2017 will classify it as a hadrosaur valid taxon.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.16.151.155 (talk) 08:57, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is sit still a valid taxon
Talk:Visits by Pope John Paul II to Nicaragua

message: I nominated the article for POV check because I feel that it may be biased. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable in Nicaraguan politics can check it. Przepla 17:26, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A rational correction of the bias mentioned can be found in Malachi Martin's book The Jesuits. --Stijn Calle (talk) 16:56, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: POV check
Talk:Dan Frischman

message: Lots of style problems - most notably the bold all over the page SCRA5071 17:29, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style problems 

message: He guest starred on friends as Rachel's boss in quite a few episodes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.239.167.121 (talk) 03:11, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Friends 

message: Add some more info about him, his childhood!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pantamorph (talk • contribs) 17:37, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography
File talk:Flag of Cusco.svg

message: This is the gay flag, not Cusco´s flag... Please remove this..
:Actually This IS the official flag. Just try Google Image Search. You should try to ATLEAST check your complaints before complaining. Get an account. Arctic-Editor 19:10, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, this is not quite the correct flag. The fifth stripe should be white, or at least very pale blue, according to the same Google image search. The article Flag of Cusco is plainly self-contradictory at the moment. --Blisco (talk) 10:20, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Template talk:British legislation lists, Acts

message: This template is a more condensed version of its parent Template:British legislation lists. My intention in creating it is for it to be used on articles relating to Acts of Parliament in the United Kingdom, where readers will not likely need a complete list of all the Statutory Instrument and Statutory Order pages. However, by clicking on the Statutory Instruments link in the template, the reader will be presented with the complete parent template and be able to navigate to any article in the Statutory Instruments section. Road Wizard 17:40, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Intention

message: I think that we should change to this ...
... to go at bottom of page.Cutler 20:27, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Navbox 

message: As you can see, the unsightly grey thing has gone. Now it's just about gradually moving the box to the bottom of pages. There are about 600 of them. Here's the list. Sorry if it's a pain. I've done about 50. Wikidea 10:27, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reverted you as you have gone about this entirely the wrong way. Rather than wreck 600 pages and then fix them, why not simply get a bot to remove the existing template from each article and add  to the bottom? Road Wizard (talk) 17:31, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changed

message: As you can see , I have replaced all of the remaining templates with UK legislation templates. James500 (talk) 21:26, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  They are all gone 

message: Is it appropriate for a template page to be redirected to another template page as this one has. James500 (talk) 09:43, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why has the template been redirected?