Template talk:POV section

message: Possible change--add variable to allow for direct linking to dispute section on talk. Syntax: .
:  The neutrality of this section is disputed. Please view the article's talk page section.
The problem is the backlog of section tags without the variable. -SV|t 17:40, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to change it to , so that only if there is a variable will the section thing occur. AndyZ t 23:44, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

text: The neutrality of this section is disputed. Please view the article's talk page section.
to make it consistant with the other NPOV templates?  I'm going to be bold and change it, but please revert if you disagree (and say why!) Cursive 15:42, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible changes

message: 
Please replace the current image with this one: Image:Emblem-scales.svg (). Thanks -- penubag  (talk) 03:39, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: <SPAN STYLE="display:none">Y</SPAN> Done - Nihiltres{t.l} 13:48, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Happy‑melon 11:51, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: I've changed the template into a call to , to reduce redundancy. Superm401 - Talk 18:19, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Call Template:POV

message: Please add  to the template itself, inside the  tags, of course. I added it to the documentation, but since the documentation page is used on other - non-protected - pages as well, that wasn't the correct solution. Thank you, Debresser (talk) 14:11, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:42, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks again. :) Debresser (talk) 14:48, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection template 

message: In Dutch: Sjabloon:NPOV-gedeelte
In French: Modèle:Désaccord de neutralité
(The French box for npov doubles as both for article use and for section use)
Thanks. (We really need a way for users to update the non-problematic parts of locked pages) Gronky (talk) 00:49, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Does the person who locked this page read the Talk page? Gronky (talk) 10:29, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Probably not. That's normally what the  template is for, to attract admins to make such uncontroversial changes. However, in this case you can simply do it yourself. Most protected templates pull their documentation, ctegorization, and interwiki links from the documentation subpage, in this case Template:POV-section/doc, which is unprotected.Amalthea 11:21, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That worked.  Thanks for explaining it to me. Gronky (talk) 19:35, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add Dutch and French interwiki links 

message: Please revert back to the October 4, 2010 version. With the exception of expand-section, all of the section templates are displayed in the larger format. There was no consensus for this change. Alpha_Quadrant  (talk) 18:35, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: .  The Blade of the Northern Lights  (話して下さい) 01:40, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 11 January 2012 

message: In the 1st part of the template documentation, it says "sorry but... KAMAN WAS HERE" Can you remove that? I think that's vandalism. Thanks, Agent 78787 talk contribs 17:22, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 14 March 2012 

message: Add the parameter |talk =  to the invocation of , so that the talk parameter will be passed through, allowing one to specify the relevant talk page section containing discussion. - htonl (talk) 16:31, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done as uncontroversial. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:58, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

text: I'm folding this comment into the earlier section, since that change might have caused this behavior. Cnilep (talk) 03:37, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Eureka – I think. The problem may not be with the template but with the documentation. Rather than an unnamed first parameter or a 1= parameter, the talk page section needs to be specified with talk=talk page section name. I will update the documentation. You can simply mark this request as answered if I'm right, or fix whatever I did if I'm wrong. Cnilep (talk) 05:55, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You're correct: as coded, the talk page section needs to be specified with . Thanks for fixing the documentation. The odd thing is that  is coded in separately, but there is no parameter "1" in the parent template, so nothing passes through to it. Hmm... LittleMountain5 07:41, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pass through talk parameter