lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Paraganglioma

message: ----
I had one of these tumors when I was 21.  It extended thru a cranial canal and was located both in my neck and skull.  It was the size of a softball!  I am now 37 and no one knows I ever experienced the tumor.  I did loose 4 nerves and what they control, but I guess I make up for it well.  If anyone is researching this and wants to talk to someone who has been there, feel free to write me at acco1st@yahoo.com.
--24.172.36.130 20:38, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: note

message: Current approaches and recent developments in the management of head and neck paragangliomas. doi:10.1210/er.2014-1026 JFW | T@lk 12:01, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Endocrine Reviews 

message: Sections for diseases per wp:medmos:
*Classification: If relevant. May also be placed as a subheading of diagnosis
*Signs and symptoms or Characteristics
*Causes: Includes Risk factors, triggers, Genetics or genome, Virology (e.g., structure/morphology and replication).
*Mechanism: For information about pathogenesis and pathophysiology.
*Diagnosis: Includes characteristic biopsy findings and differential diagnosis.
*Prevention or Screening (if the section only discusses secondary prevention it should follow the treatment section)
*Treatment or Management: This might include any type of currently used treatment, such as diet, exercise, medication, palliative care, physical therapy, psychotherapy, self care, surgery, watchful waiting, and many other possibilities. Consider discussing treatments in a plausible order in which they might be tried, or discussing the most common treatments first. Avoid experimental/speculative treatments and preventive measures (e.g., prophylactic vaccines or infection-avoidance techniques). As per the policy of WP:NOTHOW, Wikipedia articles should not be written in a "how-to" style, but this does not prevent adding official guidelines of treatments or managements if these can be presented in an objective manner and with medically reliable sources.
*Outcomes or Prognosis. May also be labeled "Possible outcomes" or "Outlook".
*Epidemiology: factors such as incidence, prevalence, age distribution, and sex ratio.
*History: Early discoveries, historical figures, and outdated treatments (not patient history)
*Society and culture: This might include stigma, economics, religious aspects, awareness, legal issues, notable cases
*Research directions: Include only if addressed by significant sources. See Trivia, and avoid useless statements like "More research is needed". Wikipedia is not a directory of clinical trials or researchers.
*Special populations, such as Geriatrics or Pregnancy or Pediatrics
*Other animals
BakerStMD T|C 21:10, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganization
Talk:Émile Francqui

message: Article created to provide additional information on science and its history in Belgium. Pvosta 20:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This bio is wholly inadequate. Francqui is alleged to have participated in crimes against humanity in the Congo, and engaged, with Herbert Hoover, in defrauding investors in various business dealings in China and (if memory serves) South Africa.  See, for example, John Hamill's 1930 expose of Hoover's business career, "The Strange Case of Mr Hoover Under Two Flags." Captqrunch (talk) 13:47, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism

message: Can anyone confirm that the city of Ilebo was renamed Port Francqui after this person? According to fr:wikipedia, but without any reference, the city's name would be derived from an expedition called "Bia-Francqui"? Jan olieslagers (talk) 18:17, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Port Francqui
Talk:Mechander Robo

message: I moved the title picture to the screenshot gallery.  Mainly I am trying to keep consistent with the existing numbers of super robot pages.  Where the main robot itself is the main picture.  Ideally the show should get a wikipedia page, and the robot should get its own.  But there is not enough info to go around multiple pages.  Benjwong 20:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi I just got your message. Been busy cranking out quite a number of pages and haven't checked back here for a while.  Anyhow, feel free to change it back.  I have been going by the first group of super-robot pages as references.  As long as both pics make the page, it's ok with me.  If I had a choice, I would have a toyline, anime and mecha page for every robot.  But there is way too many wikipedia pages coming down my pipeline.  Benjwong 08:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved title picture
Category talk:Buddhist festivals

message: Bodhi Day
I'm curious why "Bodhi Day" redirects to "Rohatsu." And why on the Rohatsu page, it states that Rohatsu is not celebrated by other Mahayana Buddhists when, in fact, Bodhi Day is celebrated by all kinds of Mahayana Buddhists?
Djbuddha 20:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006 item 

message: How is this different from the Category:Buddhist holidays? Badagnani (talk) 07:07, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Buddhist holidays
Talk:Supranational aspects of international organizations

message: I just created this page.  I'd appreciate any help on getting the tables and the reference sections to play nice. ~~Tparis23—Preceding unsigned comment added by Tparis23 (talk • contribs) 
:I think I've got all the refs behaving. Leave a note here or on my talk page if I can be of more help. btw, you can sign your posts on talk pages with four tildes: ~~~~ Cheers!--Kchase T 21:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There doesn't seem to be a need for the helpme here then. I'm in Safari, and everything looks fine. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 23:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is in Mac Firefox, not Safari.--Kchase T 23:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've got it all working in Mac Firefox too. Have you tried flushing your cache? Preferences and security I believe. WP:BYC. Shift-reload. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 23:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Should we add the EU here? Alinor (talk) 16:14, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  European Union 

message: There are WP:OR questions with this article. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 17:39, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I think this article is basically original research and should be nominated for deletion.  Pugliese23 (talk) 00:24, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research
Talk:Villa Paletti

message: I just reverted a change from colour to color throughout. Per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#National_varieties_of_English "For the English Wikipedia, while a nationally predominant form should be used, there is no preference among the major national varieties of English; none is more “correct” than any other." and "Follow the dialect of the first contributor. 
If all else fails, consider following the spelling style preferred by the first major contributor (that is, not a stub) to the article."
For original article, see []
Mdbrownmsw 20:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't it also matter where it was first published?  If it was not first published in English, then it would default to what you've written.  Isn't this the way it works? Val42 04:53, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color vs. Colour
Talk:Trucks!

message: Anyone know what has happened to Paul Vinson?  He has been MIA on several shows and appears to have been "replaced" by another host, although perhaps this is temporary?  He is still listed on the website and on the shows credits as being a host yet he is nowhere to be found on film lately.  Costner 20:59, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Could someone tell me which sections of this article do not violate WP:OR? -- Second City Denmark (talk) 13:02, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:OR 

message: Trucks! was originally hosted by country music singer/songwriter Ed Bruce on The Nashville Network back in the mid '90's.  It was not the hands on show it is now.  It consisted mainly of Mr. Bruce attending truck shows and seeking out individual's custom trucks.
71.254.74.2 (talk) 12:33, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trucks! origin
Talk:Supriya Devi

message: Wikipedia... Ze Big Mamma? 
Omniae Vicipaediae Mundi?
Millions & millions of stubs!!
I said it... I wrote it... Now, let's work!! Happy new year... bye... --Patric SANS: an Occitalonian Trobador 13:09, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia?

message: The subject starred in a number of television series beginning in the 1980s. Shouldn't there be a section on it, or some mention of it? I am asking because don't have the specific knowledge (dates, titles, etc) to add the content myself. Curious georgianna (talk) 16:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Television Work?
Talk:ALICE experiment

message: I have no idea how to proceed with merging AliEn (ALICE Environment) into this article. Please advise and/or assist. Interlaker (talk) 23:52, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I am uncomfortable merging a stubby article with no sources into a well developed one, especially when there is no clear section to put the information. So I have redirected AliEn (ALICE Environment) to this article and will leave this link to the pre-redirected version. If any regulars at this article find any useful information feel free to incorporate it. Note this merge came about through Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AliEn (ALICE Environment). AIRcorn (talk) 07:03, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: 'First lead-lead collisions' says "Each lead nucleus contains 82 protons, and the LHC accelerates each proton to an energy of 3.5 TeV, thus resulting in an energy of 287 TeV per beam, or a total collision energy of 574 TeV."  (82x3.5=287) which seems to ignore the energy of the 120+ neutrons (eg lead-208 has 126 neutrons). Shouldn't the total collision energy include the neutrons KE too ? - Rod57 (talk) 20:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't neutrons have energy 

message: This article is not in line with the other LHC experiments articles.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1458:202:32:0:0:101:5844 (talk) 09:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not in line with the other LHC experiments articles 

message: The section in Data Acquisition only refers to DAQ pre Long Shutdown 2, which is now over.
Since LS 2 came with some significant changes to the DAQ side, including the new O² framwork, an update on the description seems necessary.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Derfopps (talk • contribs) 10:15, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  DAQ section seems outdated
Talk:Sérgio Pinto (footballer, born 1980)

message: I think the footballer of 1973, Joao Pinto's brother, who played for Bradford, and the 1980-born Portuguese-German of Aachen are actually two different players, conflated by Soccerbase. ArtVandelay13 21:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I though that at first as well - he signed for Bradford in 1998, which would have made him only 18! I searched for Sergio Pinto on Google, but could only find references to one b. 1980, so presumed it was him... GiantSnowman 12:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Two different players
Talk:Absolute theory

message: Today I uploaded quite a bit of content to this page. The request on it was to do so, as it was a stub. I reviewed papers for decades for Physics Essays related to this topic, and I published a paper in Physics Essays as well. The editor gave me permission to use the material for this Wikipedia page, and so I have now done so. The paper itself goes into quite a bit of detail that should be useful for an exposition of Absolute Theory as it pertains to physics, and so I believe this is a good fit to this page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delbert7 (talk • contribs) 15:46, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the upoaded content entirely. It was copied verbatim from http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1177876/pg1, which also is not a wp:reliable source here. The form and format were also unfit for Wikipedia. - DVdm (talk) 10:29, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uloaded quite a bit 

message: The following reference is cited. As I don't have access to the book I can;t say anything definitive, but it seems odd. Even if it does support the text, I don't know that it would be reliable in the context of this article.
Best wishes, Pol098 (talk) 17:24, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Governance Reform in Africa??
Talk:Absorbed dose

message: See Talk:Equivalent dose#Merger proposal. bd2412 T 09:44, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: It has been found that for stochastic radiation risk (defined as probability of cancer induction and genetic effects) consideration must be given to the type of radiation and the sensitivity of the irradiated tissues, which requires the use of modifying factors. Conventionally therefore, unmodified absorbed dose is not used for comparing stochastic risks but only used to compare against deterministic effects (severity of acute tissue effects that are certain to happen) such as in acute radiation syndrome.
I don't like the way this is rationalized: stochastic versus deterministic. It sounds like a sloppy summary, i.e. wrong categories, i.e. essentially mistaken. The real distinction is probably genetic damage versus "acute tissue effects such as acute radiation syndrome", or long-term vs acute. So let's see a citation. 178.39.122.125 (talk) 19:49, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stochastic vs deterministic
Talk:Acoustic metric

message: I am interested in the signal that a black hole/neutron star emits at the moment of transformation across the Chandrashekar limit and also at the time and place that the sudden release of the chandrashekar limit is relaxed by Hawking radiation evaporation of black hole and the exactly calculatable amount of mass, always the exact same amount of mass, explodes back into regular space . I'll wager that there can be no signal from either event.Electricmic (talk) 10:40, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signal from evaporating black holes
Talk:Plasma afterglow

message: There is not yet enough information to be considered a B-class article. Gave a no for grammar because it reads funny for first two paragraphs. May need more supporting evidence to actually allow for enough information to get to B-class. Natker (talk) 02:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Review: Natker
Talk:Jack O'Connor (catcher)

message: Jack O'Connor is referred to in the List of Major League Baseball figures that have been banned for life as having been banned for fixing the 1910 batting title outcome.  Can someone find evidence for that, because I think that it belongs in the article. Spartacusprime 21:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Banning

message: Baseball-reference lists O'Connor as having been born June 2, 1866, not June 2, 1869. Is the 1869 birth date given here reliably sourced? Dozzzzzzzzzing off (talk) 02:40, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I am sure when this article was created (by me, I think), that was the date given. With these old players, information is subject to change quite a bit. So this is normal. I usually go by retrosheet.org now, but you wouldn't be wrong if you followed baseball-reference.com or MLB.com's information, and make the change based on their information in the future. Not all of these guy are being watched anymore.Neonblak talk -  16:12, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Do you have any idea which reference is generally more reliable, or is there a noticeable difference at all? Dozzzzzzzzzing off (talk) 02:30, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I rely on retrosheet because it seems to be the most updated information for birth and death dates, as well as burials. They use information put out by SABR, later, baseball reference will piggy back the information, then eventually MLB will as well. Stats-wise, retrosheet and BR include all "major" leagues, and the NA as well, whereas MLB won't use certain leagues in their stat calculations.Neonblak talk -  10:37, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  DOB
Talk:Ambipolar diffusion

message: Middle of page: Exit at sound speed. Shoud that read same speed? I think so. If nobody else does this, I'll make the edit when I'm sure (and I remember).Bryan A (talk) 10:56, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "sound speed" is correct. I rephrased it to avoid any suspicion of a mistake, and also added a wikilink. --Art Carlson (talk) 11:20, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Both are correct.  By definition the ions and electrons must flow at the same speed, that is the essence of ambipolar diffusion.  This also happens to be the local speed of sound in that plasma.  In the context of the article I believe that same speed would be more appropriate. Jimmel9 (talk) 14:43, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  sound speed
Talk:American Institute of Physics

message: The references on this page are all published by AIP, and it would be nice to upgrade these to non-self-published sources. In the process of doing so, it would be great to clarify some statements taken from the AIP website. One in particular that this I would love to learn more about is the statement that AIP was formed in response to a physics research funding crisis in the Great Depression, a statement that I find interesting and surprising because there was no federal science funding agency at the time (e.g., NSF was established in 1950). As a person who submits to AIP journals myself, I have a conflict of interest, but have placed the tag on the site in hopes that others will take up this important task. China is wonderful (talk) 13:52, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time to upgrade the references and increase the diversity of sources
Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006/Vote/Crazytales56297

message: Not sure if this is the right place to start a discussion, but I haven't been answering the questions because I've been horribly busy in real life with my sister's school play. All those who voted oppose because of my unanswered questions, please reconsider as I answer them. Thanks, ~ crazytales-Stalk My Contribs!!!- 21:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:EBuddy

message: Should (unsupported) features be listed at all? 
Re-phrasing the bullet points into senteces?
--NexiusTech 21:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a guess, but from looking at a few of the "competition" articles, it looks like some one is trying to format the articles similarly so as to make comparison easier.  - BalthCat 04:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Features

message: I just noticed the following spam!
* Alternative login page - in case ebuddy.com has been blocked on your network
* Another Good Alternative login page for eBuddy - in case ebuddy.com is unreachable for some reason
* And this is also a very Good Alternative login page for eBuddy - in case ebuddy.com is unreachable for some reason
* If you want to login from your Mobile - Use this Alternative Login to eBuddy on your Mobile Device
86.1.108.113 (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spam 

message: eBuddy's style gets cramped when Opera 9.5 opens up the window.
IE: The tabs for the current contact you are chatting with, and the contact list, they don't show at all. 66.168.19.135 (talk) 21:07, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opera 9.5 Issues 

message: Should any sentences containing advertising be removed? 122.148.183.60 (talk) 07:34, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising? 
Talk:Basketball at the 2006 Asian Games

message: It is all so obvious China is going to win with Yao Ming.--Pg908 21:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Areal velocity

message: This page could also use a differential treatment of areal velocity a la Marion & Thornton.  Anarchic Fox 21:08, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Besides a connection to angular momentum, the concept of areal velocity also has a close connection to magnetic dipoles. The magnetic dipole moment in classical electrodynamics is often defined in terms of the area vector of the current loop, and for a single point charge traveling in an orbit, is directly proportional and parallel to the areal velocity vector. Thus, I think it would be beneficial to add a new section in the article delving into this connection between magnetic dipole moment and areal velocity further. I have already introduced a new paragraph in the introduction briefly explaining this connection between areal velocity and magnetic dipole moment. If you have any concerns or questions on this, please reply to this message. Logic314 (talk) 21:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creating a new section on the connection between areal velocity and magnetic dipole moment
Talk:Im (surname)

message: Seems notable. We have articles about Scottish clans.  --  Zanimum 21:35, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, not db-bio, as not a bio.  --  Zanimum 21:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 
Talk:Brenton Brown

message: Cannot find any reliable sources to add to this article. Have removed some statements tagged as cn since 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019. Will remove the University of Oxford category on this Talk page, as have not found evidence to support that. Tacyarg (talk) 21:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources and verifiability
Talk:Fineview

message: It's too bad there's no picture of Fineview's namesake view, which is arguably better than Mt Washington's...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.236.168.197 (talk) 20:16, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: View
Talk:Carl Corley

message: Here's a FindAGrave memorial (with photograph of gravestone) for a Carl Vernon Corley: https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/172219138/carl-vernon-corley
I note that the full name is the same, both were from Jackson, Mississippi, and both served in the US Marine Corps. The only thing that doesn't match is the DOB. The source used on the page says December 15, whereas the memorial says December 8. Should we assume this is him and mark him as deceased? --Jkaharper (talk) 19:11, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Rfull, I’ve just had a look through Ancestry and found his birth records. It seems that somebody copied it wrong in the first place and had they got it right first time, none of us would have been in doubt of the 2016 death date. I am on holiday right now but will amend article with all supporting evidence on Saturday when I return. Cheers --Jkaharper (talk) 15:46, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead?
Talk:Glen Hazel

message: "Bus service to the neighborhood is excellent" How is "excellent" bus service defined? The neighborhood has one route, the 57 Hazelwood, which typically runs less than once every half hour. You have to walk out to Browns Hill Road, outside of the neighborhood, to get more routes. Thisisnotatest (talk) 19:04, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bus service 
Talk:Oglio

message: "River X" is not usual for Italian rivers, see also WP:RIVERS#Naming. I'm proposing to move it back to "Oglio". Markussep 21:50, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. (Not that I am a fan of the rivers naming convention, as it happens.) —Ian Spackman 22:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Move completed. Olessi 18:38, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  -- Looks great .!. Neat article. -- Narnia.Gate7 (talk) 20:29, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Auxiliary field

message: The article links to Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation, which redirects back here. Is there any difference between the two? David  16:00, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation article is now a real article and is no longer a redirect. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 07:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Back-link

message: The fields D and H in electromagnetism are also referred to as auxilliary fields ( as in Electromagnetism - Grant, Phillips) in terms of the E and B fields. I'd like to add a dis ambiguities page for this, if there are no objections. Larryisgood (talk) 14:43, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There's nothing to disambiguate to, unless there is some article on D,H that is distinct from E,B. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 07:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electromagnetism