Talk:Al-Nahr

message: PEF map shows "El Kahweh" at this place, and Jacotin's map shows "El Qahwéh".  Census 1922: "Al Nahr wal Tal", Table XI (if that's it, note that al-Tall was very close and is not listed separately).  Do we have any information about a name change?  Zerotalk 00:32, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The only thing I've seen is when it was depopulated.  It seems from various site reports on the tel they're located on that those villages were established in the Ottoman period, but there's nothing in the brief histories about name change. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 2 Tevet 5774 01:24, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Khalidi has missed the SWP, Guerin, and Jacotin-stuff for this place. Looks as if he mostly relied on Aron Keminsky  for Al-Nahr history. And that at least Al-Kabri  was mentioned both in Mamluk times, and in the early Ottoman  1596-daftar, p193 in HA; looks like pretty continous habitation (which is to be expected, in an area as rich as this). Cheers, Huldra (talk) 06:25, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

text: PEF has the Birket al-Mafshukh near el-Tall, SWP I p.158, Palmer 41  (Petersen missed them). The rest of the Grootkerk's Gazetteer  names are a mystery to me. Cheers, Huldra (talk) 21:43, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

text: Thank you, that was a very good summary- -Kempinski only missed Guerin (but  just about everybody  does).  Khalidi has the Makhul -reference as "Makhul 1977:117" ...and looking at the biblio, the only Makhul he uses is also from  1977, could you please check that date again? Cheers, Huldra (talk) 11:51, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries. Kempinski wanted to make sure their story was recorded. In the bibliography for that section he has "Makhul, N, 1979. Akka and its Villages. Akka." Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 6 Tevet 5774 00:46, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earlier name? 

message: 1922   census has
p. 36:
*Al Nahr wa Tal  422 persons (3 Bahai, the rest Muslim)
*Al Kabri 553 (all Muslim)
1931   census has
p.102:
*Nahr En  120 houses, 522 people (1 Christian, the rest Muslim)
p.101:
*Kabri, El  173 houses, 728 people ( alll Muslim)
1945  census has
p.   41:
*Nahr, En   610 Arabs
p. 40:
*Tarshiha and Kabri   5,360 Arabs
There is a discussion in Khalidi, p. 27 about this. According to al-Daggagh, the populations counts for Al-Nahr and  Al-Tall were aggregated in the 1922-census, but in the 1931 and 1945 census only Al-Nahrs is mentioned (but the number from Al-Tall were presumably included in the Al-Nahr numbers.)
However, Makhul (1977) argues that this is too low a count, ie. that Al-Tall-numbers  are  not included in the 1931 and 1945 Al-Nahr numbers. Khalidi seem to agree with him. According to Makhul (1977), in 1948 the population of al-Nahr was about 600  and Al-Tall 300. (Which is closer to the average growth of the region, according to Khalidi). 
I am not sure which version we should go with: probably report both?  Cheers, Huldra (talk) 21:43, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably we should at least mention the uncertainty, with citation to Khalidi. Zerotalk 03:27, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 1922, 1931 and 1945 census

message: G. Schumacher: Population list of the Liwa of Akka p. 169ff , in *(1887): Quarterly statement - Palestine Exploration Fund  Volume: 19-20  have, in "Kada Akka":
*p. 172: Nahret Tell: 275 souls
*p. 173: el Kaweh:  370 souls
I assume that could  be Al-Tall, Acre and Al-Nahr, but I cannot find el Kabri anywhere? Huldra (talk) 16:44, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh, so he was a census taker before he went to Tel Megiddo? Who'd have thought? Anyway, it's there on page 190, but it's counted as part of Tsafet's area which is why you didn't see it at first: p.190: El Kabry: 690 souls 138 of'em taxable. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 15 Shevat 5775 07:51, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, thanks. G. Schumacher is one of those persons who pops up all over the place. I´ve used him quite a lot up at Hauran (present Syria), where he surveyed for a rail-line. Huldra (talk) 17:56, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, we dig next to two lovely deep trenches of his at my area in Tel Megiddo. I didn't know about his survey activities though. Pretty cool. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 18 Shevat 5775 23:38, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  1887-census 

message: Do we have any sources that can tell use why this place was called the coffee for most of its history? I can't find any association with coffee-growing in the sources. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 15 Shevat 5775 05:10, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is a possibility. In an article "Coffee Lore" in the PEF Quarterly of July 1905 (p. 258) I read "When the use of wine was prohibited, its place was taken by a decoction of coffee-berries. The name "coffee" is derived from the Arabic Kahweh (pronounced Kahveh by the Turks), and, in its primary sense, denoted wine or other intoxicating liquors."  Lynch in his Narrative (p243) also records kahweh as once meaning wine. Zerotalk 07:21, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: As much as I do love the fact that Arabic apparently once had a single word for two of the best beverages there are, I don't think the tell's seen much wine action since the time of the palace and the only coffee action it's seen is the obscene amount we drink during the digs. We also can't really use any of that for the article without it being synthesised info and original research. Though I guess I can put it in my Kabri villages article which probably wouldn't pass muster as a reliable source. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 15 Shevat 5775 07:41, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  El-Qahweh origin?