lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Stoney Trail

message: The Province of Alberta and the Tsuu T'ina Nation agreed to a deal for the SW leg of the ring road this year, and it was ratified by the Nation. This article should be updated to reflect that.
http://calgary.ctvnews.ca/tsuu-t-ina-members-approve-ring-road-plan-1.1512844  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.159.160.94 (talk) 16:28, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs Updating

message: This article badly needs to be rewritten, shortened, and consolidated so that is more general and less focused on details of every single interchange. History section needs to be expanded. I'm chipping away at it but it's not the main thing I plan to work on; I'll be modelling the rewrite after other highway FA and GA's. Not taking ownership by any means and would appreciate any help I can get in this regard. There's more than enough verifiable content to get this to FA status. -- Acefitt 03:18, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, please do. This article is much too detailed, even for a naturally detailed person such as myself. Hwy43 (talk) 05:43, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I'll finish up with Henday there's still some stuff I want to do there then that'll basically be my model, then I'll get working on this. I've been putting it off cause it's going to take at least a month. -- Acefitt 09:08, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: I'm not as big a fan of neighborhoods; Marlborough isn't close to Stoney Trail.  Since Calgary has quadrants, what about• • • • MuzikMachine (talk) 19:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah that's better, but per WP:UCRN I'll do it as  Deerfoot Trail SE -- Acefitt 19:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: I've noticed that the KML file is missing the now-complete southwest portion and to-be-completed west portion. It would be nice if someone who knows how to create KML files could fix that. ToThAc (talk) 22:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  KML needs updating
Talk:Alberta Highway 63

message: Has it existed forever?Landroo (talk) 19:59, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the Jurassic era, yes. -- Acefitt 06:29, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of when it was first built? 

message: (This is "repeated" here fo when the review is no longer transcluded)
Congratulations, this passes as a Wikipedia Good Article.   Nice work! 
North8000 (talk) 12:24, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Congratulations, this passes as a Wikipedia Good Article
Talk:Massachusetts Route 53

message: There may be no concurrency in the GIS data, but there is on the signs posted, so I think it deserves a mention. --71.124.196.81 00:36, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  228 Concurrency 
Talk:Charlton Ogburn

message: As the person who seeded this article, I just want to thank all those who over the past two years have contributed to the entry. There is no need to merge this page with another. Ogburn is a person of "note" for many reasons, not the least of them his knowledge of the Shakespearean question (he is without a doubt the most important and influential Oxfordian of the last 20th century).  His profile as a writer of numerous popular books on natural history, his life experience as one of Merrill's Maurauders as well as his authorship of the book chronicling that important chapter in WWII, and his prescient efforts to warn the United States State Department against he quagmire of Viet-Nam, are also noteworthy. The entry is developing nicely. Thanks! --BenJonson (talk) 17:42, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of the edits

message: I'd like to remove this section if no one objects, as part of the "clean up." It doesn't fit well with the rest of the article and seems to have marginal relevance to Ogburn's biography.
— 03:27, 9 March 2010‎ BenJonson
:Its notability depends on that of the purportedly mis-attributed quotations of Petronius. --P64 (talk) 00:42, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apcocryphal Quotation 

message: Ogburn published at least one fiction, illustrated by Evaline Ness, The Bridge (Houghton Mifflin, 1957).
Review by Saturday Review. --P64 (talk) 00:42, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fiction 

message: Does anyone have access to the original Harper's article "Merrill’s Marauders"?
The reason I ask is that Wikiquote has the quote from it as the following:
:We trained hard, but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be reorganized. Presumably the plans for our employment were being changed. I was to learn later in life that, perhaps because we are so good at organizing, we tend as a nation to meet any new situation by reorganizing; and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress while producing confusion, inefficiency and demoralization.
Rather than, as in the article here, the following:
:We trained hard, but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be reorganised. Presumably the plans for our employment were being changed. I was to learn later in life that, perhaps because we are so good at organising, we tend as a nation to meet any new situation by reorganising; and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress while producing confusion, inefficiency and demoralization.
It's just I'd be surprised if the original used, to quote from the OED, "the special French spelling in – iser"  of "organise", rather than, as supported by the OED, Henry Watson Fowler, and Horace Hart, etc., the spelling based on Latin/Greek of "organize". 
Maybe I should just go and make the spelling consistent (and correct), but I'm reluctant to change a direct quote I can't access. 
Graham.Fountain | Talk 12:17, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of quote on reorganization
Talk:John Chafee

message: He was also the inspiration for the main character in "The Marines of Autumn" by James Brady, according to the afterward of that book. Edward2020 (talk) 22:53, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: John Chaffee was something which was fairly commonplace in his youth, a relatively liberal (especially on social issues) Republican, but even during his career (let alone now) such person had become exceedingly rare and are now almost nonexistent.  There needs to be something (well-referenced, of course) to this effect about how by then of his career he was one of the very few remaining Republicans of this then-vanishing, now vanished breed, and that his son left the party due to this fact shortly after his father's death.  2600:1004:B141:CAF2:8C51:879B:A93:1CC6 (talk) 00:47, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liberal Republican
Talk:Leges provinciae

message: Your article is generally very good.  You do a good job of describing what the leges provinciae are, what their purpose was, and how they differ from the lex provinciae.  One thing though, there is a bunch of repeated information.  This is probably because you didn't delete info that was already there before you edited it, but since you have probably done more research and your knowledge is more complete, it's might be ok to delete some of that info.  Another thing, it would be good to add a bit more information about why exactly they changed from the lex provinciae to the leges provinciae; what exactly happened in 146 BC to spark this change in tax law?  Continuing on this idea, it would be nice to know how it impacted the Republic.  What did a stronger tax system do to income, trade, warfare, etc. and did establishing Roman governor in a province go against the ideals of the Republic which were strongly anti-tyrannical?  Also, do you have a primary source?  Lastly, it might be nice to use the footnote thing as a form of citation so that you know exactly what information came from what source.  Other than those couple things, the article is good.
~Scott Hanna
For the most part, this article is excellent.  There is a ton of great info, and I really liked how you organized the article into history and provisions and provided good specifics.  I only have a few small points to make.  I agree with Scott that there is a lot of repetitive information in the article, and this should be easy to correct.  Also, in the first paragraph of the History section I think there is a mistake.  I believe "about of tribute" should be "amount of tribute".  I liked how you internally linked to important words, but I'd suggest internally linking Macedonia the first time you mention it as opposed to the second (not a huge deal though).  You definitely should use the appropriate footnotes so people know exactly what is being cited.  Another suggestion would be to add a links section at the bottom that has links to relevant websites.  Finally, you may want to officially categorize the article under "Ancient Rome".  These are pretty minor points, as Scott hit upon some of the more content-based issues, and for the most part I really liked the article.--Brian Mikolajczyk
There are some minor syntax and diction flaws, but overall this is an excellent article. You really responded well to your reviewers' comments and seriously strengthened the article. It would have been helpful if you had linked to a specific letter of Pliny's, so that your readers understood the reference. Well done! Anisekstrong 23:18, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Sport in Croatia

message: I removed "highly successful" because we are trying to build an encyclopedia here, not a BBS board where everyone can write how nicely they think about their country. Before you answer or re-edit, refer to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_peacock_terms. Let's follow the SHOW not TELL policy and whether Croatia is "highly successful" or not will be the decision of our readers.
Sorent (talk) 15:38, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Remark

message: Need to watch US open 🎾how? 93.137.175.233 (talk) 09:37, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Y I can’t watch tennis 🎾 in Croatia 🇭🇷?Plenty of soccer ⚽️
Talk:Nero Hawley

message: For the mil hist assessment to be increased to B class, an info box and/or other support material needs to be included.  Also, I passed for grammar, but the recurring mention of the town's change in name could be removed.  --dashiellx (talk) 12:21, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Via Latina

message: Adding additional art of the catacombs section along with another photo.GWeinert2 (talk) 18:43, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit

message: Nice job so far! I like that you added some pictures.  In your first section, your first two sentences start with "It". I think that if you changed those to clarify what the "it" is that you're talking about, the paragraph will be more clear.  The sections could also use a little more fleshing out, but I'm sure you will do that for your final draft!
Lelder15 (talk) 05:39, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review 

message: Good start! Your structure is good, and you can tell you know where you plan on going. You have a good amount of 'further reading' sources (are those the same as references in general?) If not I'd add more references. All the information you currently have is relevant to your subject. I would love to see a lot more information on the tombs and catacombs, and even the paintings you mention. I feel more information on those would make it more of an art historical paper, rather than just historical. Talk about how different ones along the road connect and are similar, and how they are different. Maybe how the people that traveled along the route influenced the paintings and such. Can't wait for the final! 
Edmahle (talk) 20:29, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review
Talk:Russian Musical Society

message: In researching articles I have been writing about Tchaikovsky, I have found considerable material on the founding and early history of the Russian Musical Society.  What sources are available that mention its further history (and eventual demise?)?  Although this article is a good start, and does not need to be a lenghy piece by any means, it seems incomplete at this stage because the later history of the RMS is not included.
Jonyungk 00:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources on end of RMS
File talk:Racingbox.jpg

message: I notice that the article this picture is used for is titled R Racing Evolution yet this cover doesn't have the Revolution. If people wished I have a copy of the game and could upload a version of the picture with the word revolution there as well as the fact it would be a free image not one stolen from a google search as the author of the file has indicated. Xtreme racer 00:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Georgian Bay Line

message: I can't log in here, but I can assure everyone through personal experience that the SS South American was not made out of wood.  She was made of plain old ship's steel, about 3/16" plates and riveted frames.  I worked on the ship in 1966, along with a lot of other Cleveland college kids.
:Thanks for the correction, you are part of what makes the Wikipedia project special.  Bigturtle 02:10, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Via Traiana Nova

message: There are references to via Traiana Nuova in local newspapers and in scientific journals such as https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/papers-of-the-british-school-at-rome/article/abs/via-cassia-and-the-via-traiana-nova-between-bolsena-and-chiusi/33663BBF3352D70FE835CA4F84E7AFEA# and https://www.orvietonews.it/cultura/2023/07/24/restauro-e-valorizzazione-per-i-monumenti-ad-esedra-dell-area-archeologica-di-sant-ansano-103606.html which creates confusion in researching this road.  I recommend adding a page to clarify this and point to the new page. 98.97.16.245 (talk) 12:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Via Traiana Nuova in Lazio, Umbria, Tuscany
Talk:Martin Hynes

message: This is in the People from Oregon category, but there's nothing about Oregon in the article. Can someone add the info with a cited source? Thanks. Katr67 01:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I added the info from imdb.com. Not sure if that is a good source or not. Awotter (talk) 03:27, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: From Oregon?

message: I (davemcarlson) assure you that the subject is notable and there are sufficient citations available to support this artist's notability.  This is not a vanity page. I have created over 40 new articles, and never has one been subsequently deleted.
:In the future, just provide the "sufficient" citations to demonstrate notability and people will not try to delete articles you start. Aboutmovies (talk) 06:30, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Creator's comment
Talk:Eukanuba

message: The 'Fun With Eukanuba' section is copied verbatim from http://us.eukanuba.com/eukanuba/en_US/jsp/Euk_Page.jsp?pageID=EH, and should probably be excised or paraphrased. Jonabbey 14:21, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought that looked familiar, so I rephrased it. Though, I'm not positive it warrants its own section. -- Kevin 21:47, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marketing Language 

message: Does the pet food recall really need to be mentioned?
Landhermie 01:24, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Recall 

message: Hi, I am a university student editing this article for a class. Please be nice. Thank you. AshleyEN (talk) 03:15, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Misc

message: Eukanuba's website and International Directory of Company Histories Vol.26 (1999) and The Name's Familiar II (2001) (the only sources I could find) claim the brand is named after a 1940's slang term of musician Hoagy Carmichael, meaning "the best".
The veracity of this claim is dubious. I performed a thorough search of Archive.org for "Eukanuba" and found no recorded instances of the word prior to the pet food (note: the "Published" years on Archive.org are usually incorrect. Years must be double-checked manually.)
It's still possible the claim is true and that "eukanuba" as a 1940's slang term has a recorded instance under a different spelling, or is recorded on audio/video somewhere. Can anyone find an archived instance of the slang term? This would verify the claim.
'''
–Vuccala 20:09, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious name origin claim
Talk:Pioneer, Louisiana

message: My birth mother says she was born in Pioneer but was adopted and was raised up to adulthood in Vidor, Texas. I'm simply trying to locate general information. I know her maiden name is the one she has now. I have minimal names and information that my mother could offer. BonniP323 (talk) 09:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Researching family tree
Talk:Mermaids in popular culture

message: Should it be added to the entry about Dethklok's song that there is a song on the second Dethalbum that is a sequel? track nine is "Murmaider II: The Water God" 208.110.178.156 (talk) 13:42, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dethklok 

message: Television:  H2O Just add Water, Mako Mermaids and Freeform's Siren
Movie:  The Little Mermaid (2017)  (it has Poppy Drayton in it)
Thank you :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Celticmistry (talk • contribs) 01:44, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add 

message: This is supposed to be an article about popular culture, therefore, shouldn't works like "Prufrock", Moby Dick, and others, be removed? Rwood128 (talk) 15:52, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have since, hopefully, resolved this issue, with links that clarify this matter. Other, similar edits are possibly needed. Rwood128 (talk) 16:11, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Literature
Talk:Erich von Hornbostel

message: Why, what, where, and how does this article need additional citations for verification? Hyacinth (talk) 17:17, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Several paragraphs are lacking refs but are packed with factoids that ought to be sourced.  Dicklyon (talk) 17:20, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations
Talk:BNCR Class S

message: The phrase "turn of the century" is now out of date. angela26 01:41, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: The information that used to reside here about the Great Northern Railway of Ireland Class S 4-4-0 locomotive has been transferred without editing to a new article appropriately titled "GNRI Class S".
A new article on the subject of the BNCR and NCC Class S 2-4-2T locomotives and derivatives will appear under the current title. Geologue 06:52, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed article subject to match title
Talk:Bellovaci

message: This is personal preference, but I'd like to see in-text citations.  It is much easier to verify facts or get more information if the statements of interests are directly linked to the sources from which they come.
This is especially true for statements that are in some ways opinions.  This would include, for example, (from the opening paragraph) the phrases "The Bellovaci were the most powerful and numerous of the Belgic tribes" and "They were considered the bravest of the tribes.".  For phrases such as the latter, it would be nice to know who considered them to be the bravest of the tribes.  From the verb tense, I assume you mean that the ancient romans (i.e., Caesar et al) but you could also be refering to a modern historian's view point.
In the geography section the subject of this first sentence is the city Beauvais.  The transition into the second sentence, in which the subject is pronoun referring to the Bellovaci and not the city Beauvais, is in my opinion awkward.
Without including original research, can you give a reason as to why the name "empty war" was given to this tribe.  It not, it's not a problem.
I'm not sure that the general warfare section is necessary.  While it is a key point, it integrates fairly well with the following section.
Was Caesar the first (and only?) general to fight the Bellovaci??
DavidBild 01:49, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: When evaluating contributions to an article, make sure to check the "history" tab (see Help:Page history for more info).  Other editors will often modify the article while someone is working on it, or the article may contain earlier contributions. For example, this particular article has existed as a stub for a while. Thanks, nadav 07:05, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caution when assessing work
Talk:Zach Slater and Kendall Hart

message: I have placed a  tag on this article, as I don't believe it meets guidelines for a supercouple.  Can anyone provide sources that this couple has won awards, or is genuinely notable outside of the fan community? --Elonka 16:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion

message: I gave it a complete overhaul. Flyer22 19:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated article 
Talk:Lex Plautia Papiria

message: I think this article was very well written and clearly stated the purpose of the law and important implications of it. I thought it was very helpful to divide the article into sections for clarity. I realize this was not all your writing, but perhaps the first paragraph should be reworded at some parts because it was a little confusing at first glance.
-Paris Kingsberry
You have written a very well organized article.  Nice job adhering to Wikipedia conventions.  The links to related articles are appropriately placed and help to clarify the Latin terms.  Perhaps you can add information on how the law affected Roman citizenship policy following the Social War.
--c-kobeski 165.124.113.24 05:50, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Victor C. Strasburger

message: A well sourced and referenced section on controversies surrounding the subject's research was removed by the living subject of this biography in Sept 2010.  As I understand, this violates Wikipedia's TOS.  Although biographies of living persons do need to be handled with great care, I don't believe it is permissible for subjects to remove peer-reviewed criticisms of their work and comments.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.46.56.73 (talk) 02:34, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That is untrue. Though we in general discourage involved persons editing articles, they aren't forbidden to do so. In any case, the material removed looks questionable. It is based on primary sources, with no evidence of notability, and as such any Wikipedia editor would have been correct in removing it. I am going to remove the 'neutrality' tag. Please do not replace it without further discussion. AndyTheGrump (talk) 04:23, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, this doesn't look like the right decision.  The removal of published critiques of the scholar's work by the scholar himself does look like a conflict of interest.  That probably shouldn't have been done and I think perhaps the POV tag returned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.129.197 (talk) 21:32, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversies section removed by living subject
Category talk:Natural horror films

message: Some animal horror films that don't have articles yet;
*The Savage Bees - 1976 TV movie
*Tentacles (film) - 1977 Jaws-inspired octopus film
*The Bees (film) - 1978 film 
*Nightwing (film) - 1979 vampire bat film
*Kraken: Tentacles of the Deep - 2006 giant squid TV movie
Masaruemoto 19:44, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles missing