Talk:Intraosseous infusion

message: Possibly add this into the I/O_(disambiguation) page  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.140.233.16 (talk) 15:24, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1277-6 JFW | T@lk 14:32, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Systematic review in adults 

message: Request adding information and photos on Pyng Medical's two new Sternal Intraosseous Infusion Devices:
1. FASTResponder Sternal IO: Released in 2013 - http://www.pyng.com/fastresponder 
2. FASTTactical Sternal IO: Released in 2016 - http://www.pyng.com/fasttactical
In addition, our FAST1 Sternal IO is still available and has been available since 2000 - http://www.pyng.com/fast1
Full disclosure: This request is being made by Pyng Medical for the purpose of updating currently available Sternal Intraosseous Infusion Devices. 
96.44.122.156 (talk) 18:53, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Since you haven't proposed any specific changes to be considered by an outside editor (requests like adding information on 2 new devices cannot be completed by an independent editor, who are there to look at the neutrality and verifiability of proposed changes), this proposal shouldn't use the edit request template, instead just being a talkpage request for related editors to improve the article. You may wish to reopen the request with the proposed text to be considered. Request declined. Regards, VB00 (talk) 08:55, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Some proposed changes

message: I'm not familiar with this subject but a decent grasp of English suggests to me that the person who typed the quoted sentence may have made an error:
"The IO site can be used for 24 hours and should be removed as soon as intravenous access has been gained."
It seems to me that the word(s) for whatever it is that should be removed has been left out - this sentence seems to suggest you should remove the site, which strikes me as an impossibility.
So if someone can check - please and thanks.
Mathsgirl (talk) 13:13, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible error - knowledgeable person please check 

message: 1. Improve and expand article organization.
2. Add new references and replace inappropriate references.
3. Improve article writing
J.Sallee,UCSF (talk) 21:45, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing goals 

message: The article is very concise and well written. I was impressed by how the article had many headers that explained the indications, procedures, contraindications, etc.… This made for a great summary of what intraosseous infusion is. The edits that were made substantially improved the article.
The group did achieve their overall goals for improvement. They did expand the article and make it more organized by adding the headers. There are now a total of 32 references in the article and the article is easy to read and is written in layman’s terms. All goals for improvement were met. 
The points that were included were in fact verifiable.  All the sources that I checked were peer reviewed or secondary, and were freely available. I feel as though the group did a very well job in using excellent peer reviewed sources meanwhile making the article a well written piece explaining intraosseous infusion.
Gtchapanian (talk) 21:30, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review 

message: J Tate, Future UCSF Pharm.D. edited the reference section so that all dates are displayed in the correct format. a total of 6 dates had to be corrected.
J.Sallee,UCSF combined duplicate references. references #1 & #11 were duplicates; we consolidated all callouts in the text, which now refer to reference #1. Jgoucsf ensured that all references were appropriately formatted in accordance with Wikipedia's Manual of Style. We believe that no predatory publications were identified.
J Tate, Future UCSF Pharm.D. (talk) 22:43, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference Verification