lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pennsylvania Attorney General

message: The article on William Bradford Reed says he was elected Pennsylvania Attorney General in 1838. If so, it would seem that there is missing history of this office in this article. --DThomsen8 (talk) 19:22, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The other article is incorrect.  I changed it. Choor monster (talk) 16:13, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  William Bradford Reed 

message: I copied the information from The Pennsylvania Manual (1970–1971) 100th edition.  An online version of the list can be seen here.  Somebody else will have to merge the two tables, include governor information, and all that.  Also, I am doublechecking links.  For example, the existing John C. Knox was never PA AG.  There are probably other dabs.  Note that the linked-to list disagrees with some of the post-1930 information.  Also, the linked-to list has misprints.  It is indeed Guy K. Bard, not Guy H. Bard, as can be verified by looking up the 1938 version of the previous link. Choor monster (talk) 16:10, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  List completed 

message: Miller is not on the official list, but he is listed as having served as PA AG here. Choor monster (talk) 16:19, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Andrew G. Miller]] 

message: Do all attorney generals assume the title 'The Honorable' whilst in office? If so should WP show this title for each of the attorney generals. John a s (talk) 20:50, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 
Talk:Treasurer of Pennsylvania

message: Added G. Davis Greene, Jr. who was appointed by casey after Budd Dwyer committed suicide.  
List of state treasurers in the manual
TastyPoutine talk (if you dare) ] 02:41, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Added to list

message: Did Budd Dwyer become the treasurer in 1985? According to the inscription on his tombstone, he became in 1980.--202.55.199.71 (talk) 14:18, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Budd Dwyer 

message: The earlier Pennsylvania Treasurers were elected by the General Assembly, but in modern times they are elected by the voters. This article should explain this in more detail. --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:40, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elected by the General Assembly, or by the voters? 

message: John Banks (U.S. politician) was Pennsylvania Treasurer 1847-1848, among other public offices. I corrected his actual name in this list. Dthomsen8 23:52, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: John Banks
Talk:Pasión

message: Corrected link to Pasion (telenovela). Used a piped link because the title of the page does not have the accented "o" (ó), but wanted to stay consistent (and correct) in spelling on disambiguation page.  But, am a relative neophyte, so apologizes if i've stomped all over wiki conventions! :o)  Frillypink (talk) 07:06, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You got it right. However, a few days after you fixed it the page was moved to Pasión (telenovela), so I've just updated the link to reflect that. Ttwaring (talk) 15:21, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

message: I don't see that a merge would help. If this page is merged then Passione (disambiguation) should probably also be merged - but I think the reader is better served by the 3 separate pages. PamD 07:21, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:Das Floß der Medusa

message: "The black flag of North Vietnam" ?!--91.148.159.4 (talk) 22:59, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears as if this comes from Andrew Porter's April 1970 review of the recording. It shouldn't be difficult to check.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 05:39, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The black flag of North Vietnam"?
Talk:National symbols of the United States

message: If these items are "official" we need to cite a reliable source that says so.  Blueboar (talk) 22:06, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: What makes this "Official"

message: I have some distant recollection of some hybrid of rose being a national flower -- although this certainly might not have been official. But does the US have any of the things that states have... a national version of state bird, state flower, etc.? user: PurpleChez  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.118.65.34 (talk) 14:42, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: D'oh! The rose is, indeed, mentioned. Still wondering about the other stuff.... PurpleChez (talk) 14:45, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other stuff 
Talk:Sue Harris

message: This may not be a living person; see
https://www.shropshirestar.com/news/2015/04/10/woman-died-in-shrewsbury-hospital-after-mistake-over-injection/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.243.2.33 (talk) 15:33, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure this is a false alarm, no mention of any death on the mudcat folk forum www.mudcat.org which would be certain to note such things. Also this person's name is Sally Ann, not Sue, Kirkpatrick, even though she does have a husband named John... Tony 1212 (talk) 20:37, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sally Ann Kirkpatrick 

message: There is a children's author called Sue Harris, but I don't think they are the same person.
Books:-
* Treasure in the Deep (2005)
* Chang and the Rice Robbers (2005)
* Pop-Up Facts: Human Body (2007) Ogg (talk) 07:21, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not; my quick Google search when I ran across this article and did a little cleanup showed a few Sue Harrises. Probably they are all of roughly equivalent low-level notability and if articles are created for the others, this one should get moved to Sue Harris (musician) and the resulting redirect made a disambiguation page. AUTiger » talk 21:29, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Not the same person at all. This one is just Sue Harris. An article for the writer has yet to be created. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:30, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Kindly provided by User:Atlantic306, covering Harris's work with choirs: . Martinevans123 (talk) 19:32, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book source
Talk:Confessions of a Matchmaker

message: There should be a mention that this show got cancled.  I haven't seen it in a year.  It's a midseason replacement. 75.19.36.243 (talk) 07:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The difficult thing about mentioning cancellation, is that one must cite the effective date of cancellation, and describe a little about the circumstances.  I'm not sure about how much information has been released about it. Tsarevna (talk) 06:14, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 
Talk:Test match (rugby union)

message: The first reference used in the article is a nice bit of POV WP:OR which reads "Although the Ireland national team includes players from two different political entities—the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, a part of the United Kingdom—the island of Ireland is considered a single country for rugby purposes, with the Irish Rugby Football Union governing the sport throughout the island". The ref is placed after a wikilinked mention of the British and Irish Lions and the Pacific Islanders. I'm not sure that it's in the correct position, but more importantly, I'm not sure it's even necessary. The Lions article has plenty of info about its constituent teams, and the footnote - and that's what it is.its not a reference! - is really trying to 'explain' an irrelevance to the subject of the article - Test status.
So I'm going to remove the entire ref as unnecessary. Atlas-maker (talk) 09:54, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Stuff and nonsense
Wikipedia talk:Fan analysis

message: First blush - we need a better definition of what fan fiction is, to make sure plot summaries aren't included in that.  But I do agree, this should be an obvious non-free content policy. --MASEM 07:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia already doesn't allow fanfiction. No article is a story, or at the least shouldn't be. It does allow articles on fanfiction (notable ones, anyway), which is different. This proposal seems to have confused that. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 07:59, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree that the point that should be addressed here is "fan analysis", which, of course, violates WP:OR without any issue.  But then I go back to my point (devil's advocate), at one point does summarizing from a higher level go from "summary" to "analysis"?  Case in point is the Back to the Future timeline (which I believe lead to this suggested proposal).  While 90% of the article is stating in-universe timeline events, much of the article is based on synthesizing from one scene in the second movie that any time travel backwards creates a new timeline.  That's perfectly fine to talk about in the context of BTTF2, but then the article expands on that to assume it is true for all 3 movies (and the subsequent 7-8 timelines created).  That is analysis/synthesis prohibited by WP:OR.  On the other hand, if I were to provide an overall season-by-season general theme of, say, Lost, while I would need to combine some events, no analysis or synthesis is made, thus appropriate for that.  (Then, of course, going into what the numbers or the polar bear means, without sources, is OR). So I think if we need to state this above what WP:OR already gives, it needs to be tailored in that direction.  --MASEM 15:20, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, but again, that would be a whole different issue than what this is meant to propose, and would likewise already be well-covered by OR anyway. Granted, BTTF timeline is a tricky issue in that regard, but not something that this proposal would cover in either case. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 18:16, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Unitron

message: ===Vote to keep===
This article deserves to be kept. I agree it is short but it has the potential to be expanded in the future. Unitron was a very prominent manufacturer of optical instruments in decades past. Their products were highly durable and many still survive to this day. In particular I constantly come across old Unitron telescopes and eyepieces at universities. It is valuable to know from the article that they still sell spare parts for these. The article also serves historical importance in case Unitron goes out of business. Unitron was no smaller a player in the field of amateur telescopes than Meade or Celestron, which both have very informative articles. Because Unitron was at its peak before the Internet age means that information about it is harder to come by hence the brevity of the article. To delete the article would be time-discriminatory. I'll add a telescope manufacturer category in the hopes that somebody with more information can expand it. Jason Quinn (talk) 07:45, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Keep or delete article

message: This article deserves to be kept. I agree it is short but it has the potential to be expanded in the future. Unitron was a very prominent manufacturer of optical instruments in decades past. Their products were highly durable and many still survive to this day. In particular I constantly come across old Unitron telescopes and eyepieces at universities. It is valuable to know from the article that they still sell spare parts for these. The article also serves historical importance in case Unitron goes out of business. Unitron was no smaller a player in the field of amateur telescopes than Meade or Celestron, which both have very informative articles. Because Unitron was at its peak before the Internet age means that information about it is harder to come by hence the brevity of the article. To delete the article would be time-discriminatory. I'll add a telescope manufacturer category in the hopes that somebody with more information can expand it. Jason Quinn (talk) 07:45, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote to keep

message: I found some interesting history of Unitron at the cloudynights.com forums. Jason Quinn (talk) 22:17, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Compression garment

message: I did a search for "Compression garments" and nothing relevant came up in the first two pages of results, so I created this page and only later discovered there's a page called "Compression stockings".  So this page I created may be unnecessary.  But I think the other page should have been called "Compression garment". 
Literary Fiction (talk) 07:45, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: This article is very very poorly sourced, and i'm not convinced some of the citations used actually back the claims they're supposedly sourcing. Tagged medref Lordkazan (talk) 00:09, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Poorly sourced

message: I tagged this page with POV issues. In particular, under Research, the first source cited (Duffield, et al) finds no significant difference for many of their results, but the article only mentions the results for which significant differences were found. drt1245 (talk) 19:38, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV Issues 

message: Both this and the other article about the same thing. Better to have it all in one page. Galobtter (talk) 16:46, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I made the other page redirect here. It had the same content. --Frmorrison (talk) 19:18, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Compression sportswear]]
Talk:M1G

message: Is it an "adduct" or it is more correct to put it as an "adduct-forming chemical", for adduct consists of both DNA and the chemical? --CopperKettle 05:15, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing out the problem.  I modified the text to fix this as well as several other inaccuracies.  Cheers.  Boghog2 (talk) 07:03, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

text: I'v upped the image to the Commons. --CopperKettle 07:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Adduct?

message: *  ; from a free fulltext: The pyrimidopurinone adduct, M1dG, forms from reactions of 2‘-deoxyguanosine (dG) with either the DNA peroxidation product, base propenal (8−10), or the lipid peroxidation product, malondialdehyde (10−12) (Scheme 1).--CopperKettle 12:47, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Opps. I guess that I misinterpreted the citations. So M1G is the DNA adduct while pyrimido[1,2-a]purin-10(3H)-one is the product of repair of the DNA adduct.  I will revise in the next day or two to correct the error.  Thanks for catching my mistake  Cheers.  Boghog2 (talk) 22:13, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

text: This is somewhat confusing.  M1G is pyrimido[1,2-a]purin-10(3H)-one while M1dG is the product of repair of the DNA adduct.  I will expand the article to include the second pathway.  Cheers. Boghog2 (talk) 18:37, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, I think article is now accurate, but perhaps not very accessible to the general reader.  I will try to make it clearer by adding a graphic of the reaction scheme when I find some time.  Boghog2 (talk) 20:54, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The second way
Talk:DeDee Nathan

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.usatf.org/athletes/bios/TrackAndFieldArchive/2003/Nathan__DeDee.asp. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB 19:56, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Philip Henson

message: This article has a 5 1/2 year old maintenance tag—none of the (numerous) references are cited in-line. Unfortunately, the originator and the most prolific editor have been gone for 9 and 6 years, respectively. The maintenance tag was the final edit from that editor! If anyone's familiar with the material, please jump in. Tapered (talk) 05:27, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inline citations
Talk:Hélène de Beauvoir

message: Considering how substantial the French and German ones are I was disappointed in the sources I found.--T. Anthony (talk) 08:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Furo

message: Added wayback link for Ofuro Etiquette since the original link was broken. Change back if it returns. --68.83.163.196 16:08, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I think it would be worth noting why 風呂 uses the kanji "wind" and "backbone". Not exactly an intuitive expression for "bath". -- 188.192.232.136 (talk) 12:59, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology?
Talk:FrightFest (film festival)

message: OK, you've got a little while for some sources, but if nothing improves, this goes to AfD. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 08:36, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  There's a final list of this years films for the festival here: http://www.frightfest.co.uk/filmindexpage.html but they've not kept lists of past festivals on the site. I can did through archive.org if it'll help any. --Tonym001 (talk) 11:50, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment 

message: I'm doing some cleanup and wanted to explain my actions. I also wanted to mention that I'm aware that a lot of this article is unsourced - that will be one of my future projects for this. My main focus here is making this easier to read. 
I've moved the Glasgow FrightFest to its own section. This has been a yearly offshoot of the London festival for a while now, so it merits its own section. 
A lot of sections listed the films by date. This is honestly pretty unwieldy to read and makes the page longer in ways that isn't really necessary. In later years some films are screened on multiple days, so this also makes it a bit redundant. I'm changing this to prose to make it a bit more wieldy. 
Once that's done I want to find sourcing and hopefully add more to the sections other than just a listing of films. On a side note, I think that at this point it may be a good idea to retitle this article. The film festival itself is titled just "FrightFest", not "London FrightFest Film Festival". This is likely as a result of it branching out. Rather than holding just one event they now hold three major events: the London event in August, the Glasgow event around February, and the Halloween event in October. I'll start a move discussion. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 19:20, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page cleanup
Talk:Claudine Monteil

message: Taken from the Simple English article. I try to complicate it when possible so I'd be doing some work. If it's still too simplified feel free to fix it.--T. Anthony (talk) 08:40, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:NHL recap

message: Also, this template is currently only being used at 2007–08 Chicago Blackhawks season. It would probably be a good idea to make more use of it going forward since a number of team season pages with links to nhl.com box scores are dead and need to be repaired anyway. --75.88.92.21 (talk) 18:05, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs updating
Talk:WALE (Rhode Island)

message: I would love to see the article about Steve White beating Salty.  Just goes to show that Newspaper contests can be tampered with (sounds like White's people or he himself stuffed a lot of ballots).  Also, I think the National Vanguard was the time buyer but I think one of the revisions is correct in that "American Dissident Voices" was the name of the show.  I'll have to check 2002 program schedules I have.Stereorock (talk) 01:30, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Offical Web site expired about a month ago, which may indicate some change in the status of this station.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 07:24, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Station web site is completely gone now.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 20:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Website

message: WALE is, as of December 16th 2013, still licensed albeit silent.  I reverted a good-faith edit that claims the station "was" as apposed to "is" licensed to Greenville, R.I. because the station still has a license.  That being said, they have not yet applied to renew the license which expires April 1st and the deadline to do so (December 2nd 2013) has passed.  It is possible before too long this revert will itself be reverted and WALE will be D(eleted)WALE.Stereorock (talk) 03:16, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It is now April 2nd. The station has not filed a renewal but is still listed as "licensed". I would like to revert the above edit but am hesitant to do so until the F.C.C. formally deletes it.Stereorock (talk) 03:48, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Had to sadly revert a good-faith edit
Talk:I'm Not There (soundtrack)

message: About the LP version, currently the article says that it "features the various artists on the record holding up the side numbers on cue cards." This part could be clearer. Does this mean on the LPs themselves there are pictures of the various artists? Also, right now it sounds like there are pictures of all of the various artists. Is that right, or is it only some of them? Moisejp (talk) 03:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: LP version

message: Just as the film is not about Dylan's music, this is not really the soundtrack. The title should be read as a warning.al (talk) 09:54, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warning 

message: On side 2, I think the following tracks are missing (according to amazon and allmusic): Track 2 "Cant Leave Her Behind" by Stephen Malkmus & Lee Ranaldo as well as track 7 "I wanna be your lover" by yo la tengo.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.6.122.112 (talk) 05:34, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track listings messed up
Talk:Cutie Honey (film)

message: It popped up saying that the page seems similar to http://anime.fansub.tv/encyclopedia-article.php/Cutie_Honey%23Cutie_Honey_.28film.29/Cutie%20Honey%20(film) and might be a copyvio...except that article was clearly taken from Wikipedia and is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. Not a very bright bot :/ --SeizureDog (talk) 10:06, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CorenSearchBot  
Talk:Jatiya Kabi Kazi Nazrul Islam University

message: In Varsity Admission.com  website and in the Template:Public Universities of Bangladesh the name is 'Jatio kabi Kazi Nazrul Islam University' but in University Grant Commission website the name is Jatiya Kabi Kazi Nazrul Islam University so I've created this article and corrected the template with this latter name. This university has no website.
Tanvir che (talk) 10:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name