Talk:Wank Week

message: I know the urge to tag this article for deletion is strong the moment you see the title, but check the references, etc. --Fabio 03:20, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Check the references, etc 

message: Since it's now September, this should already have been shown. I think somebody who saw the programmes should perhaps update the page. --Storkk 18:49, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it's been shown yet. I think they're still trying to find compulsive masturbators for another programme. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 19:48, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Scheduled for August

message: Crazy. If nothing comes up, we could consider this for deletion again.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 20:53, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still not shown yet and it's over a year later? 

message: * Michael Grade blurb - irrelevant. Hadn't been at Channel 4 for years. (For contextual purposes it might not be a bad idea to point out that Channel 4 has a reputation for controversy)
* Date it was originally intended to be broadcast - actually the earliest articles e.g. from July 19, 2006 suggest that a date in 2006 was originally planned. There is a ref for March 2007, but it's clear from the July 2006 story that this probably wasn't the original intended date of broadcast.
* Time that the films may be broadcast in the future
* Description of what exactly Masturbation for Women/Girls was alleged to contain other than interviews with Betty Dodson (the DS reference states "in which three women "experience the revolutionary masturbation tutorials of Dr. Betty Dodson" but doesn't say what is shown on camera).
I removed that stuff; I think with the additional references, everything that appears in the text is now well-sourced. TheGrappler 09:35, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stuff that was in the article but I took out 

message: *Meets the criteria.  Thanks for addressing my concerns, from above.  Cirt (talk) 05:07, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Pass

message: I removed some vandalism from this page: one of the headings had been deleted and replaced with the "F-Word". But I was surprised when I looked at the history to see that the article had been that way for five days! and I see vandalism is a common problem on this article. Perhaps this article should be semi-protected to prevent such vandalism from happening in the future. I've taken the liberty of adding it to the Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Phuthaditjhaba (talk) 10:49, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  vandalism--Maybe this article should be semi-protected  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Wank Week. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061117064719/http://news.independent.co.uk/media/article1981701.ece to http://news.independent.co.uk/media/article1981701.ece
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:39, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified