Talk:Forugh Farrokhzad

message: The last paragraph is not neutral.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:D270:B060:9AF:F70:E8AB:1984 (talk) 06:05, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Wew lad

message: This article is so full of errors it should be redone! First of all, Forugh Farrokhzad was a woman, not a man! Secondly, there are several spelling errors in the names of important figures around FF, such as Ebrahim Golestan (misspelled as Brahima!). This article is not trustworthy at all.
(2.146.12.229 (talk) 18:07, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The articles was vandalized shortly before your comment, I now restored the correct version.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:58, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Errors

message: I just consulted a résumé of Forough Farrokhzad (now linked to the article) in which it is stated that Forough has been the fourth child of the familiy rather than, what is  stated in the present article, the third child. Perhaps someone should investigate and find out which one of these two, if any, is correct. 
--BF 22:27, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third or fourth child? 

message: Why oh why was this edit reverted? The long list of works read as promo (it just missed the info where to order the book) and the summery of this list in Her work is translated into (...) seems sufficient to me. The Banner talk 12:48, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the fact that her works were translated into foreign languages is encyclopaedic. We can discuss how detailed this info should be (note that I removed some direct links to the publishing houses, which were at the edge of promotion), but just the list of languages, translated pieces, and the names of translators are entirely encyclopaedic.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:57, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm, I am not convinced. The Banner talk 23:18, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Looks then like we need a third opinion. Should we make an RFC?--Ymblanter (talk) 08:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translations 

message: I am curious to know if Farrokhzad wrote the following line: "The bird shall die, remember the flight"? It's quoted here
https://books.google.ca/books?id=yoQQ2YzmMyMC&pg=PA283&dq=farrokhzad+bird+shall+die+remember+the+flight&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=farrokhzad%20bird%20shall%20die%20remember%20the%20flight&f=false
But I can't seem to find its source. It's quite nice, even if it's short. Perhaps worth including in the article itself? If not, then no real loss.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.27.88.67 (talk) 14:19, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  poem 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  —Nnadigoodluck███ 09:43, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Forough Farrokhzad →  – reason for move  It is because Forough is the incorrect spelling of this poet's name. When it was initially latinized it was not done correctly. Today, most reputable translators and writers spell her name as: Forugh Farrokhzad. Wikipedia's incorrect spelling leads to widespread misspelling and hence mispronunciation of her name. Forugh Farrokhzad Team (talk) 14:50, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:35, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 December 2020