Talk:Ketef Hinnom

message: Rewrote article as follows:
*For Funhistory: the history of the debate over the dating has been put in a narrative format, so that the reader can better understand the current scholarly consensus (which means I agree with a point you made in an earlier edit).
*New Interpretation section created: I'm rather a minimalist when it comes to interpretation, very careful not to go beyond what can safely be said; probably you guys will disagree with me on this one, but always open to suggestions.
*Text: It contains some interpretation, not from me. I'm not happy with it but don;'t want to change anything that's well sourced - but this isn't sourced. Can you tell us where it comes from?
Hope you like it. PiCo (talk) 15:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Bravo!  I don't mind allowing Minimalists the last word as long as it's just a desperate speculation (i.e., that these scrolls could have existed prior to the establishment of a religious culture based on either a strong/reliable oral tradition, or far more ancient texts)--Funhistory (talk) 16:53, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: I have removed the following from the end of the introductory paragraph: "...and preserve the oldest so-far recovered example of the Tetragrammaton." Unless I am mistaken, the Mesha Stele dates to some two centuries before these amulets, and contains the Tetragrammaton. Please feel free to revert if you can find a reliable source saying that the amulets are older. Robin S (talk) 11:32, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Earliest" use of the Tetragrammaton 

message: The are many images in HE:כתף הינום - why not add some here? Ori229 (talk) 21:08, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  images 

message: I am in the process of editing and re-writing this article for the purposes of bringing it up to Wikipedia's standards.  As it stands, it does not describe or present the material in an encyclopedic manner.   Em-jay-es 05:20, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overhaul 

message: The OR problem is the statement " the most conclusive reexamination of the scrolls".
There is later research challenging and arguing for the dates. "The Ketef Hinnom plaques are not only the earliest examples known verses appearing in the biblical text, but they are also important sources study of religious concepts held in Jerusalem in the early post-exilic amulets were probably engraved in the early Second Temple period, many years after the construction of the temple." "A New Appraisal of the Silver Amulets from Ketef Hinnom" Author(s): Nadav Na ?aman Source: Israel Exploration Journal, Vol. 61, No. 2 (2011), but this is challenged in A "Rejoinder to Nadav Na?aman's 'A New Appraisal of the Silver Amulets from Ketef Hinnom'" Author(s): Shmuel A?ituvSource: Israel Exploration Journal, Vol. 62, No. 2 (2012). Doug Weller talk 10:14, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Later research & OR 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ketef Hinnom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716095351/http://www.tyndalehouse.com/tynbul/library/TynBull_2002_53_1_02_Waaler_KetefHinnomText.pdf to http://www.tyndalehouse.com/tynbul/library/TynBull_2002_53_1_02_Waaler_KetefHinnomText.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified