lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:University of Pristina

message: The article about Hashim Thaçi states: "During his university years, he was an Albanian student leader and the first student president of the parallel Albanian University of Pristina that broke off in 1989 (and organized in the early 1990s) from the official University due to Kosovo Albanians' protest of Slobodan Milošević's new imposed status of the Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija." Probably these events should be explained in the History section of this article. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 12:09, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  1989–1999 

message: The article should be tuned to focus on its subject and to avoid having too much detail about the split. Current History section contains little detail about the "Albanian" branch in 90-s and nothing about the university since 2003. In other places there are leftovers from the previous University of Pristina battlefield (eg. "University of Pristina (Serbian)" or several lengthy citation bundles that are needed no more). I could try to do it on my own, though an editor with more insight could do it better. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 23:09, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Focus 

message: Article should be moved into University of Pristina, which is the name in English. --Rrallepermall (talk) 20:18, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: User talk:Rrallepermall - It should have a name that is reasonable for an English language website. It's really silly to use a name that even involves something most English speakers don't know how to type (the dots over one letter in the name). University of Pristina (Albanian) would be my suggestion and re-name its counterpart University of Pristina (Serb). Frenchmalawi (talk) 16:25, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: I have edited the introduction to state the English name for this institution first with the Albanian translation after, without realizing (of course, this is South-East Europe, how can there not be) that there exist parallel institutions claiming this name. Please, please can we be adult and use English-language norms, if not in the title, then at least in the introduction?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.32.4.236 (talk) 10:04, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Read talk page history, and you will understand why are those articles named like that. And do not rename articles without any agreement and talk page consensus. Thanks. --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 22:31, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead 

message: Should the article be moved into University of Pristina "Hasan Prishtina"? The "Hasan Prishtina" name was officially added by the senate in 2012 and appears in all official documents issued by the university, as well as the website. I am going to edit the text but I strongly believe that it should be moved. Other universities, such as Ss. Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich etc have their full name as title. --User:Uniacademic (talk) 13:19, 09 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the university (potential move)
Talk:Christopher Franke

message: From the official site:
The record label, initially an outlet for Franke's prolific studio albums and film and television music, has grown to include an eclectic mix of artists and genres. We have expanded our repertoire beyond the already established catalog of Soundtracks and Jazz artists by adding the affiliated labels Earthtone Records for World Music, New Age and Sonic Images Electronica for Ambient/Electronic Music.
You might make a claim about Earthtone (although it is not exclusively New Age, you should mention World Music too) however not for sonic
Earthtone should also be mentioned. Both Earthtone and Sonic Images release mostly New Age Music. Earthtone has more of an ethinic or world music feel to it while Sonic Images is more synthesized NA music. Dunk meister 22:29, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Well, I guess you know you are in trouble when the discussion page is 3 times as long and contains 4 time more info that the actual "article". The scrap of info here reads like a high school music review magazine piece. This entry is a complete waste of time.  A very typical wikipedia music entry -- juvenile, illiterate, biased, and written by fans regurgitating magazine articles and press info without any knowledge of the truth. Viva wikiality!
:There is not a lot of info on the article, yes, but I'm not seeing where you get "juvenile" or "biased" or "without any knowledge of the truth" or "complete waste of time" from. The article DOES tell who Christopher Franke is and what he's done. You'll have to be more specific if you want someone else to fix things for you. Or you could fix things yourself... --Tropylium 13:15, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad, Bad Article

message: No mention of this work from 1981? 
2001:56A:F03F:5200:CD44:EF2E:353B:9660 (talk) 06:29, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Luul
Talk:Natural fiber

message: In the final section of the stub, 'Mineral Fibers', the basis of categorization is not obvious, nor is the source from which the categorization has been reproduced named. Perhaps someone could check up on that and mention the basis of categorization as well as the source. 
This section further names the contributer and the company which he belongs to. I am sure that is against the rules. So, I deleted the name.
Priyatu 10:34, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basis of typification and acknowledgement of user contribution 

message: I have just copyedited the page, but more work could still be used.  I'm going to keep this tagged as a page that needs copyediting.
:I revised the lead section to add references and describe "natural fibers" instead of "fibers." MTLE4470 grp8 kml (talk) 15:30, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I also revised the plant fibers section to include references. I removed the sentences after the plant fibers table because I could not find references for those. MTLE4470 grp8 kml (talk) 22:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone, spelling, and grammar

message: Seeking info about tensile strength of specific fibers.  Had to delete remark about bast fibers having greater tensile strength, as leaf fibers from some plants are stronger than bast fibers from other plants; It may well be that the source of the strongest natural fiber are the bast fibers of a specific plant, but that is a different remark.  GeeBee60 (talk) 19:59, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tensile strength 

message: Important of natural protein fiber 2409:4042:906:1C8:E2B5:442:F95B:C10C (talk) 14:10, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Textile 

message: ri 2409:4085:4E04:1CA1:0:0:4D88:A300 (talk) 16:56, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richness of fiber
Talk:Grass (disambiguation)

message: Don't merge - I think its fine how it is at the moment. Keep 'Grass' (the plant) as the main, and have this as the disambig. MadMaxDog 05:33, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

message: I think that Poaceae should be the primary meaning. And, not all plants called <qualifier> grasses have narrow leaves (Whitlow and scurvy grasses are exception). Lavateraguy (talk) 20:05, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. One stumbling block could be what to do with the section at Grass#Fiction. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 16:00, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Primary
Talk:6PR

message: That's some great work there dave, hard to believe an article never existed on this station, which I listen to for their biased calls of Eagles and Dockers games against the Dons ;) Cheers!  Rogerthat Talk 10:44, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We need some new logos for the Fairfax radio stations we should keep the old ones as historical reference, We need new logos for i.e. 3AW, 4BC etc
They need to be compliant with Wikipedia logo usage policies, and should be placed on the appropriate articles as Southern Cross broadcasting is no longerAdrian90 (talk) 08:07, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New logos needed 

message: I have advised Jason Jordan that we need him to verify ownership of the photo.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Radiogossip (talk • contribs) 12:46, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image Copyright 
Talk:Stanford Daily

message: I've started this version as an alternative to the copyright-violating version currently found at Stanford Daily. As a student at Stanford, I should know more about this publication than I've written here, but I don't. My roommate works for the paper and can probably be of some use, so I'll bug him to get involved. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 10:46, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Temporary version
Talk:Pachakutik Plurinational Unity Movement – New Country

message: consider merging with Plurinational Unity of the Lefts  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.70.18.45 (talk) 14:32, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Using white as a party color is a real bother in election maps, infobox and diagrams. It's better to avoid it whenever possible. I don't know about the sources saying white is their customary color, but we don't use the customary one either for Allianza Pais. Why not simply use a color of the logo as usual? Purple is on it, it's close to the previous one, and it isn't used by any other ecuadorian party.--Aréat (talk) 13:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: As this party frequently uses rainbow colours, I would say this is definitely acceptable. Wikipedia, first and foremost, is designed to be easily understood and readily accessible. If including their customary colour would cause unnecessary confusion among readers, and there is an alternative colour that is readily associated with the party, I think it is acceptable to substitute the former for the latter for the sake of clarity. Best regards, Goodposts (talk) 00:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color
Wikipedia talk:Flower garden

message: Insert lengthy debate here on whether this page is a policy, a guideline, a humoristic metaphor, or all of the above. Radiant_>|< 10:51, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't care, but it sure is a good metaphor. --Celestianpower háblame 10:05, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Limes Germanicus

message: There are a few minor spelling problems; I will check the print version to verify. --FeanorStar7 11:02, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: spelling problems
Talk:Mandarin Chinese/to do

message: Sections needed:
*Geographic distribution
**Discussions on official status as well as dialects are usually put under this header.
*Grammar
*Classification
Sections needing improvement:
*History
**Good overall section, but in need of more detail.
*** Many details in 
*Phonology
**A comprehensive summary is sorely needed. What phonological traits do Mandarin dialects share? How do they differ from other forms of Chinese?
Created by Peter Isotalo 11:09, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ella Koon

message: I removed the section called "profile." It was unencyclopedaic i.e. including such things as "measurements", "pet's name" and "blood type", and moreover it was a copyvio from  - AKeen 00:22, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Profile" 

message: Would someone STOP erasing the name. It is a given fact that the assaulter was Jeff Choi.
:All content on Wikipedia is subject to verifiability. Until a reliable source is able to attribute this claim, then the "assaulter" will continue to remain nameless. Thus far, the sources provided in support of this whole incident do not mention the name Jeff Choi, I have looked at all three already. It should also be noted that biographies about living persons are subject to increased scrutiny per the policy of biographies of living persons - where the summary above this talk page reads: 
:"Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard." Luke! 05:37, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of Assaulter 
Talk:List of airports in Australia

message: None of the airservices australia links seem to work since they changed their website :(
:Shouldnt really have external links inside the article, at best they should be used as references. Suggest they are changed from links to refs. MilborneOne (talk) 12:39, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links broken 

message: I have removed the large wikidata text dump from the page, I cant see any value in having a copy here and wikidata is not a reliable source. MilborneOne (talk) 17:21, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikidata
Talk:Lepcha people

message: Mun led to a disambiguation page that didn't include a relevant option, so I added an option on that page and changed the reference here so the lack of link is clear.
--81.6.234.170 11:36, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Where are the citations? "Some anthropologists?" Not good enough. 
"Many research scholars have come up with as many theories regarding the origin of the Lepcha people. But the Lepcha people themselves firmly believe that they did not migrate to the current location from anywhere and are indigenous to the region. "
We need specific citations and credit to the people who say these things.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MurasakiBhakta (talk • contribs) 13:44, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving the page 

message: Folk-lore and Customs of the Lap-chas of Sikhim By C. De Beauvoir Stocks
http://books.google.com/books?id=o9Eowe7SYocC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rajmaan (talk) 19:47, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Folk-lore and Customs of the Lap-chas of Sikhim By C. De Beauvoir Stocks
Talk:Virago

message: Was there an orginal woman named Virago from whom this word originates?  The first sentence of the article makes it seem so.  If this isn't the case, I think it should be made clear that this article is about a word and not a woman128.135.230.219 (talk) 02:40, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: I moved the page to Talk:Virago/Classical anthropology, where it's less in the way. It can be edited there, if need be. Thanks, -Will Beback 11:42, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that article content was delted as a result of an AfD. -Will Beback 16:26, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Please do not restore the material which was deleted by the decision of the community. If it is necessary to inform the world of your findings then please find another venue. -Will Beback 23:27, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: /Temp page

message: Prof. Rubenstein and his helpers deny the correctness of the following statements (which I would like to re-edit) obviously due to political reasons explained in Kevin B. MacDonald's "The Culture of Critique"(2002), where the Jewish proneness to Boasian racial egalitarianism is explained:
"Additionally,the about 40 human races differ significantly in "hardness". Every race as a whole has a more male or a more female character and thus a higher or lower percentage of viragos. E.g.women from Indonesia and the Phillippines (Nesid race) are both physically and psychically much more softer on average than women of the Nordid, Dinarid or Osteuropid race.The Western women's rights movement is primarily a result of the male character of the European women. Because the Jewish Boasianism controls the West serving Jewish group interests (cf. MacDonald, "Culture of Critique",2002), only Chinese anthropology has been maintaining the race concept and a serious anthropology until 2005. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.138.192.222 (talk • contribs) 
The immediately previous comment was made by a user known as the Asian fetish vandal (see also here, who routinely vandalizes this and other pages with racist and anti-Semitic tracts. -- Gnetwerker 00:10, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boasian (pseudo-scientist ?) assistance Prof. Steve Rubenstein and his helpers try to block real science 

message: This entire article, in particular the lede, seems to present a tone overwhelmingly enveloped in, and giving WP:UNDUE weight to, certain feminist perspectives that are irreverent to the expected definition of the term in relation to its usage both historical and contemporary. I suggest a revision that presents its definition a la termagant and its synonyms and a separate section for critique and "taking back" the term in a tone that certain audiences would perceive as "positive" (which this article seems to assume the latter is).--Sıgehelmus  (Talk) |д=) 16:36, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV problems
Talk:Tu quoque

message: Source 3 is a Medium article written by a computer scientist; while I see its value as an opposition position, I don't know if it constitutes the broadly phrased "critics say".
I'm legitimately uncertain if this constitutes a problem, it just feels odd; I at least wanted to see if someone else had input. ReeceGames (talk) 19:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @ReeceGames I think this counts as a weasel word. One person is criticising, not "critics". I'm personally unsure of how to fix it, but I agree with your sentiment. —Panamitsu (talk) 21:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsure about source 3
Talk:Solomonic column

message: This article lacks one of the basics. What the hell are Solomonic columns? --UVnet 11:42, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The opening line has been amended to read "The Solomonic column is a helical column, characterized by a spiraling twisting shaft like a corkscrew." --Wetman 00:53, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Basics

message: I want to change the 'solomonic' redirect to this page and point it to Judgment of Solomon instead. People looking for architecture are more likely to know the term 'solomonic column', while Solomonic is typically used as an adjective for either Solomonic decision or Solomonic compromise. Thoughts?Diego Moya (talk) 19:07, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been bold and done the change. I think this is justified by wp:primary topic, as the column is named after the king.Diego Moya (talk) 13:16, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect from 'Solomonic' 

message: I haven't been able to find anything to confirm the sentence in the article that suggests Solomonic columns may have been linked with Boaz and Jachin. The tradition was that Constantine took the columns from "Solomon's" Temple, but I don't think they were ever implied to be the giant exterior columns. Renaissance depictions of Constantine's columns show them in the interior of the temple.  The Biblical description does not match the columns either, so it seems unlikely that this would have inspired the column design. I am going to remove the sentence unless someone objects or supplies a reference.--Bkwillwm (talk) 05:09, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boaz and Jachin 

message: In the first section, the following sentence: "Constantine is recorded as having brought them de Grecias i.e., from Greece," does not use correct Latin. It should be "de Grecia" or better, "de Graecia". Does anyone have the source of the original quotation?--Ermenrich (talk) 03:19, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "de Gracias" 

message: Other than the book cited I have never heard of an oak tree being the first arc of the covenant.  The citation is of some writer's opinion. Alexander R. Burton (talk) 15:02, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arc of the covenant
Talk:Hull University Labour Club

message: Hi, 
Existing students of Labour Club (alongside some older alumni) are currently looking to find out more about our own history to be showcased at the end of next year. The project has only just started, but we have found some interesting information on the club in Hull archives, and through contact with old members, and we hope to take this forward with further interviews with previous members - both famous and not-so-famous - round about 2nd-26th September 2012.  
The information we have on the club in the 1960s currently looks promising, but we're looking at considerable grey areas both before then, and afterwards into the 1980s/90s. However, I note that many of the edits to this page are not cited, and it's possible some of you are writing from your own memory, and have vital information which might be useful to us. 
If anyone reading this wants to get further involved in the project, has some good information, or is even willing to give some time for an interview this coming September, please don't hesitate to email me at tcstephens1@gmail.com   
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.128.114.195 (talk) 13:34, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Appeal for Information
Talk:Girsanov theorem

message: As stated, the aricle is wrong : (Zt) won't be a (positive) local martingale if (Xt) itself is not a local martingale (take dXt = dt as the simplest counter-example).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.128.127.113 (talk) 00:14, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The statement of this difficult theorem is hard to follow and definitely wrong.  For example, the article has the equation.
:\frac{\delta Q}{\delta P} = SE(x \bullet W)
The left hand side is a Radon-Nikodym derivative.  The notation on the right hand side is nonstandard but it is clear from what follows that it is denoting a geometric Brownian motion process.  But the Radon-Nikodym derivative of one probability measure with respect to another is a random variable, not a process. Brian Tvedt 12:05, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, but you can always turn it into a process (and a martingale in fact) by taking conditional expectation with respect to the probability measure P.  --DudeOnTheStreet (talk) 18:18, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is in need of attention 

message: Asking for confirmation before changing the second term to the diffusion function. 2001:708:20:1412:0:0:0:1DF5 (talk) 13:05, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surely the first functional equation in Application to Langevin equations is wrong? 

message: 1) explain "the usual conditions have been satisfied"
2) In corollary, do you need to add that  \mathcal{E}(X)  is martingale as assumption? 103.167.135.164 (talk) 18:53, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, the calculation for [\tilde{W}_t] is rushed. 103.167.135.165 (talk) 02:50, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions
Talk:Aptera Motors

message: The 2019 revived Aptera Motors is planning to produce an EV with a range of 1000 miles with solar panels capable of adding up to 44 miles per sunny day.  
This new Aptera has gotten quite a bit of press, including 
https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1124775_1-000-mile-electric-car-unveiled-aptera-returns-10-years-later
https://cleantechnica.com/2019/08/29/aptera-is-back-baby-new-improved-electric-car-will-have-1000-mile-range/
and 
https://wefunder.com/aptera/
Fotoguru (talk) 16:17, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time to update Aptera Motors page, moving model 2e to History and describe the 2019 solar powered model 

message: There's certainly a relationship between the current Aptera Motors and the original - same founders, same basic concept. But the product lines discussed in the article are muddied between old Aptera (ca 2007-2011) and new Aptera (2019-present). I'd suggest that any discussion of old Aptera be confined to a "History" section, or possibly separated into a completely different Wikipedia page. 172.59.73.165 (talk) 16:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old vs. New "Aptera"