lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Namkum

message: Please making any redirection link to Ranchi district, please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, please read and understand User:Angela/Stubs. Thank you. --Bhadani 16:22, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:41, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 

message: About fee structure and campus selection , scholarship 2405:201:A402:101F:3D5F:8A82:FDC:2BF3 (talk) 04:32, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bsc nursing
Talk:Ormanjhi block

message: Please making any redirection link to Ranchi district, please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, please read and understand User:Angela/Stubs. Thank you. --Bhadani 16:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:43, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Rania block

message: Please making any redirection link to Ranchi district, please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, please read and understand User:Angela/Stubs. Thank you. --Bhadani 16:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:48, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Ratu block

message: Please making any redirection link to Ranchi district, please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, please read and understand User:Angela/Stubs. Thank you. --Bhadani 16:24, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:49, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Silli block

message: Please making any redirection link to Ranchi district, please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, please read and understand User:Angela/Stubs. Thank you. --Bhadani 16:24, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:53, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:1968–69 WCHL season

message: The following request to move a page has been added to Wikipedia:Requested moves as an uncontroversial move, but this has been contested by one or more people. Any discussion on the issue should continue here. If a full request is not lodged within five days of this request being contested, the request will be removed from WP:RM.  —Stemonitis 06:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Contest I moved this article (the spelling error is entirely mine; my apologies) and other such articles with the rationale that if the main article is at "Ontario Hockey League" all daughter articles should incorporate that name rather than "OHL." For instance, see United Nations Security Council, not UN Security Council, UNSC, or Security Council. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 03:48, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I do believe the standard is that all articles are to use the name they are most commonly referred to as. These leagues are best known as the OHL not the Ontario Hockey League. --Djsasso 03:52, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Both here and below I looked at WP:HOCKEY and didn't see a standard that contradicted my moves, but furthermore, I don't see why any standard should. Certainly the OHL itself is more commonly known as the OHL, but its article is not there, right? Why would all of the daughter articles of that main article have a different name? That seems illogical to me. Imagine the havoc that would wreak in a print encyclopedia, for instance. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 03:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:COMMONNAME is the standard for all pages in wikipedia. And there was a naming convention set up at WP:HOCKEY or we wouldn't have had them all named exactly the same way. Regardless for moves of this magnitude you should be consulting the related wikiprojects. --Djsasso 03:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Realizing that the page name standard for sports leagues is currently completely thrown off by Koavf's move of literally every single abbreviated sports league page over the last few days, the common name is the abbreviated name. Thus the abbreviated name should be the standard for all pages except for the league's article itself, where the abbreviation is introduced for the league in the first sentence. --fuzzy510 16:14, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Support - Should all be moved back to abbreviated names. BsroiaadnTalk 17:34, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

text: All these page movements by Koavf, should be reversed. He should have discussed is 'movements' plans, first. GoodDay 16:13, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Support - Should all be moved back to abbreviated names. I completely agree with GoodDay BsroiaadnTalk 17:34, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contested move request
Talk:Torpa block

message: Please making any redirection link to Ranchi district, please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, please read and understand User:Angela/Stubs. Thank you. --Bhadani 16:25, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:57, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Sonahatu block

message: Please making any redirection link to Ranchi district, please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, please read and understand User:Angela/Stubs. Thank you. --Bhadani 16:24, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Louis Pauwels

message: The full article is currently being translated from the French article of the same name. Feel free to check out User:Tamarkot/Louis Pauwels. Tamarkot 16:14, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: it is a subset of the one to be found there
I am twitchy and procrastinating on something else I am supposed to be doing so I will do a phrase here and there, about my speed right now. More info at French article, Seems to be a semi-important journalist historically. Elinruby (talk) 03:46, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  the bibliography does not need to be contributed to the French wikipedia 

message: "In the late sixties, Salvador Dalí agrees with Louis Pauwels long conversations in his house in Portlligat, north of Cadaqués. Dali book, staged by intuitions image or gesture. Burning stages of a rationalizing discourse, it serves its raw truth. The questions the interviewer will be erased to make room for all the verve of the Catalan painter who recites with humor and impertinence his surrealist ideas." Daliesque prose, how about English? GangofOne (talk) 03:41, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-English
Talk:Burmu block

message: Please making any redirection link to Ranchi district, please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, please read and understand User:Angela/Stubs. Thank you. --Bhadani 16:19, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:07, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:St. Mary's Catholic School, Mansfield, Ohio

message: Hi
Thanks for deciding to contribute to Wikipedia. Here are some things that would be good to add to this article:
*How many students are there at St. Mary's?
*What grades go to St. Mary's?
*Has anybody really famous gone to St. Mary's, who maybe played sport at University, or wrote a book?
If you could find out any of the answers to these, they would be really good things to add. DJ Clayworth 16:17, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jerkin

message: This article appears to be of an appropriate length for the subject matter under discussion. It is also appropriately categorized and wikified. 
By nature, stubbing and tagging articles devalues them, giving them an aura of unreliability and making them seem less credible. As part of my personal campaign to free up articles that have been stubbed and tagged without cause, this article has been disenstubbified. 
If any editor disagrees, and would rather re-stub it than improve it by adding actual content, please discuss here. The Editrix 16:18, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  De-stubbed 

message: Are gilets and jerkins the same garment? Cuddlyable3 (talk) 00:06, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same as [[gilet]] ?
Talk:Mechani-Kong

message: I claim that the monster is notable for having appeared in both a television series and a feature film; this information cannot be contained in either The King Kong Show or King Kong Escapes. If, however, Dr. Who got his own article, Mechani-Kong's might well be merged into it. —Crazillatalk|contribs 16:19, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is his species listed as "god"? Isn't he a robot? Booger-mike (talk) 01:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Argentine Footballer of the Year

message: Shouldn't we rename this to Argentine Player of the Year? :)
Sebastian Kessel Talk 16:27, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been discussed, but I don't think "Argentine Player of the Year" will be a proper name for the article as foreign players can receive this award (Chilavert and Salas for example are among the winners). Bruno18 18:02, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename
Talk:Black Uhuru

message: *The group was named by Stan 'Roy Scientist' Palmer whom Duckie referred to in interviews as a 'madman'. Common knowledge among the group's Waterhouse contemporaries is that 'Roy Scientist' wrote most of the lyrics for the 'Anthem' album, including the title track, "Party in Session", "What is Life", and others. He was however, never formally credited but testified to this in a lawsuit that was a part of the fight over the spoils and legacy of Black Uhuru. According to Roy Scientist, the significance of the name goes much deeper than the obvious translation. In the Rasta vernacular, 'black sounds' is both a verb and a noun. To 'black sounds' means 'to speak or utter'. Roy Scientist explains that the mixture of Swahili and English in the name is in recognition of Africans in Africa and in the diaspora, especially Jamaica, the nationality of the group members. This is the first time that so detailed an explanation has been given for the name 'Black Uhuru'.
The above was deleted along with the trivia section some time ago. Can't find any reference to this "Stan 'Roy Scientist' Palmer" on Google, other than in older copies of this article floating on mirrors. It all sounds like OR to me, but if it can be verified, then both he and his explanation for the naming are probably important enough to be included in the history of the group, as is some information about this "fight over the spoils". DewiMorgan (talk) 14:37, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Stan 'Roy Scientist' Palmer

message: Three other WP pages (The Tip; Mishka; and Lucky Thompson) all note that (Lucky's son) guitarist Daryl Thompson was in Black Uhuru, whereas this page's list of musicians who are or were members omits him. Can anyone clarify this? Nick Barnett (talk) 12:03, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daryl Thompson
Talk:Ahmad Ghany

message: Definitely brother-in-law, not uncle?  I just did a quick mental burst to try and figure out what "mother's sister's husband" or whatever the old version said, and came up with uncle.  Thanks Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 16:29, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: http://www.newsday.co.tt/crime/0,39003.html has details of the arrest. Sherurcij (Because you can't fight terror by spreading fear)  03:16, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: TT story
Talk:Integrated engineering

message: Danke Adam. I agree with Shabnam, but I believe at this point some visuals would be nice. Again, with accordance with Shabnam, we shouldn't paste an UBC-IGEN logo on, as it is an article dedicated to Integrated Engineering as a whole. In the future we can create another page specifically for the Integrated Engineering Program of UBC, which would essentially be a cute summary of the UBC-IGEN page. Any additional ideas?
TakTak 12:33, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Space Research Corporation

message: South Africa was never defeated in Angola. --Anon.
:From History of Angola:
::"The coalition quickly broke down and turned into a civil war. The United States, Zaïre and South Africa intervened militarily in favor of the FNLA and UNITA. In response, Cuba, backed by the Soviet Union, intervened in favor of the MPLA. In November 1975, the MPLA had all but crushed UNITA, and the South African forces withdrew."
:I disagree. --maru   (talk)  contribs 18:37, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  South Africa's defeat 

message: The introduction is, with a few trivial exceptions, an exact copy of the first paragraph of section “Artillery exports”.  A lead section which summarizes the entire article should probably be written.  50.181.30.121 (talk) 03:59, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article introduction 

message: “Artillery exports” makes the following contradictory statements in the same paragraph:
* “The new 'pointy' shell … was spun by fins on the shell rather than rifling in the barrel”
* “The shell was spun in the same way as conventional artillery rounds with a driving band towards the base.”
Other Wikipedia articles suggest that neither of those is correct.  Might anyone with knowledge of the subject be able to clarify this?  (And of course a good source which the article could cite would be great.)
50.181.30.121 (talk) 05:02, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: My interpretation of the author's original writing is that the initial spin direction is the same, but the fins controlling the spin behave in a different manner.  That being said, I'm not expert on artillery, and don't understand the implications/differences of such a change.  Additionally, this information lacks a citation, so I'm unable to verify this information.  I  have added a request for a citation, and will intend to follow up on this article. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 05:24, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I found some references on the GC-45, all of which indicate that the gun has rifling. Indeed, the article itself states that the shell's spin is only regulated by fins and not only by rifling in the barrel (I have cleaned up the wording to clarify that fact). I have left the "reference needed" tag on the projectile itself, but I have gone ahead and removed the contradict tag, as the section is no longer contradictory. CThomas3 (talk) 05:10, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spinning the projectile 
Talk:Henry Hazlitt

message: There appears to have been no discussion of the changes made to Henry Hazlitt recently. There have also been considerable improvements and additions in recent days. Having checked all of the recent changes, including citations, I can see that there have been alterations involving logical and chronological rearrangement and wording that are substantial -- but also that none of the original factual material or the citations supporting them have been omitted. Indeed, the citations of the same material have been added to and the material cited best supports the factual material covered in the article. For this reason, I am reverting the changes which alter this by Gabriele499, assuring her that all of the original sources are still cited in the article and more material is now to be found, even if it has been reorganized.Pelagius2 (talk) 03:51, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undoing Revisions 

message: Isn't he "best known" today through his books like 'Economics in One Lesson' which discuss the whole of economics, not just the New Deal? During his lifetime, perhaps, but even then his books were at least as famous as his columns. Oolyons (talk) 01:00, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Best Known"? 

message: Hazlitt's influence on Ronald Reagan and modern conservatism is equally important to mention. CPAC quote provided.Oolyons (talk) 21:35, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influence on Reagan and Conservatives 
Talk:Cântico da Liberdade

message: The official language in Cabo-Verde is portuguese, as attested by www.governo.cv
Indeed, that the hymn is written in portuguese is not hard to confirm. On the other hand, people speak the dialect of their island while in the archipelago or with other nationals; the dialects are usually brought under the common name of cape-verdian creoule, and there have been efforts to consolidate it as a language.
Rdrs 16:34, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Who backs up the translation "Song of Freedom"? Is there a reliable source? If not, I would suggest the more exact "Freedom Chant", or "Chant of Freedom". What do you think? --Waldir talk 09:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation 
Talk:Curse of Muldoon

message: :Unsourced speculation about a certainly nonexistent phenomenon.  This article should be deleted. 129.93.164.69 (talk) 18:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What about The Curse of the Bambino?
It began in 1919 (some say 1918), several years before the Muldoon curse.
Just curious. 2600:8800:784:8F00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 12:32, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Curse of the Bambino" ?
Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/Space Race/archive1

message: Comments about the process moved here from the review subpage:
*Comment—Alabamaboy, we can't possible use the FARC template on the Space Race talk page: it's misleading/incorrect now. Is there a new template for FA review nominations? I'll put a note on the talk page to drum up interest among the contributors. In terms of your Point (1) alone, a minor review might have been more appropriate. However, I can see that your other points make a major review suitable. Tony 14:17, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I totally agree. The problem is that the language on this FAR page said to use the FARC template. I just changed the FARC template language and link to reflect this new situation. The question remains, though, whether to rename the FARC template itself or keep it now that the wording and link in the template has been changed. One of the reasons I went ahead and made this nomination was to help figure out any flaws in the system. As a result I changed a number of links and wording on other pages so people will now come to FAR. Best,--Alabamaboy 14:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I've found a major problem here and I can't fix it. On Template:FARC, the category link needs to be changed so that it links to FAR, not FARC. However, when I changed the link it didn't work. Anyone know how to fix this? Just to be clear, unless we fix this category link the link to FARC will remain at the top of each FAR nomination.--Alabamaboy 14:34, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All problems with the FAR start-up appear to now be fixed.--Alabamaboy 15:46, 8 June 2006 (UTC)