lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:KFDA-TV

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
# WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information." As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.
# As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced.
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article.
# Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable. Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 19:59, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 

message: I occasionally loose signal from Y’all and just wanted to make sure You knew! It’s been off since before 6:00 am today?
Thanks
Chrismoreland50@yahoo.com 2604:CB00:F18:BB00:9467:7D59:DF33:C7F0 (talk) 16:24, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Low signal in Dumas
Talk:KGNS-TV

message: I've seen several website saying KGNS airs The CW in subchannel 15.2 and Telemundo on subchannel 15.3. This is not true. -AMAPO (talk) 07:06, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: as of october KGNS started transmitting on subchannels CW 15.2/8.2 & Telemundo 15.3/8.3 -AMAPO (talk) 18:54, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Research and Innovative Technology Administration

message: RITA was moved to the Office of the Secretary of Transportation (OST) as of January 2014, as per RITA's website.https://www.rita.dot.gov/about_rita Unfortunately, OST does not have a wiki page of its own, as it currently redirects to the wiki page for the Secretary of Transportation. There needs to be some revamp of this page and a creation of a page for OST, which I may do at some point if I have the time. Kleftarcle (talk) 12:56, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Transfer to Office of the Secretary of Transportation (OST)
Talk:KIXE-TV

message: This article has but one source. I have tagged some problem areas, but other than the station's own website, I can't find anything to back up some of the stuff in this article. I am not going to delete much more content, but there are whole sections that are very out of date, or contain dated information etc. It is a mess that myself and a few others need to fix. --ḾỊḼʘɴίcả • Talk • I DX for fun! 05:16, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Update... when something bothers me I usually fix it because it will keep eating at me until I do. I have taken the liberty to clean up major problem areas of the article, including the way it was written, which at times resembled an advertisement, and other times... well, it wasn't written very well. I also added citations, removed the dead link, and generally cleaned up a lot. Also, the cable systems and such violate WP:GUIDE or WP:NOTDIR, which ever. The article is not done yet, it still needs a good once over by other editors than myself. I hope there are not others out there in dire need of upkeep like this one, but I am up for the challenge! --ḾỊḼʘɴίcả • Talk • I DX for fun! 05:40, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: In need of attention

message: The entire timeline seems to be taken word for word from https://www.kixe.org/about/kixe-history/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcoolbro (talk • contribs) 17:41, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright issue in timeline
Talk:KKRA-LP

message: I called and e-mailed Rapid Broadcasting for programming information on the main article of KKRA-LP.--grejlen - talk 21:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Textiles in folklore

message: In the section describing te Lady of Shalott, the open roundel is referred to as a "window" when it is in fact a mirror.  As the poem states, "the mirror cracked from side to side...."  The crack is visible if you examine the painting closely.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.157.131.94 (talk • contribs) 
:I've corrected the article. Fuzzypeg☻ 23:54, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Lady of Shalott"

message: I couldn't see any discussion here relating to this tag, and reading through the article I could see only one sentence that raised possible alarm bells (after the cultural propaganda mention was removed): that of the male weavers possibly usurping the female role.
So I have removed the  tag. If anyone wants to put it back, please leave an explanatory comment here. If you only disagree with small sections of the article, then it would be more appropriate to employ the  tag (placed after the offending sentence or clause). Fuzzypeg 14:00, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. - FrancisTyers 23:39, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing Original Research tag 

message: How much are spinning and weaving related? They seem to go hand in hand in mythology. More can be done with the German section I started, if anyone has time. I think Mother Goose stems from Holda and/or Perchta (through the name "goose-footed Bertha") but need to remember my source before mentioning that. Goldenrowley 17:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I rearranged sections a bit today, to put thoughts under the proper culture. Valkries are Norse, Jacob Grimm is German, and so on. Frigg added. Holda and Perchta added.Goldenrowley 18:22, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spinning and weaving

message: In this article (Textiles in folklore... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textiles_in_folklore ) it states:
In Germanic mythology, Holda (Frau Holle) and Perchta (Frau Perchta, Berchta, Bertha) were both known as goddesses who oversaw spinning and weaving. They had many names.
In this other article (Frau Holle... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frau_Holle ) it states:
Frau Holle (also known in various regions as Holla, Holda, Perchta, Berchta, Berta, or Bertha) was initially a pre-Christian female legendary figure who survived in popular belief well into the 19th century.
Thus, according to the Frau Holle article, Holda (Frau Holle) and Perchta are two names of the same female legendary figure / goddess.
So, which article has it correct?
Thibeinn (talk) 21:42, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Article Has It Correct?
Talk:KLEW-TV

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 13:58, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 

message: Recently, an I.P. keeps adding the station's staff members, but the problem is they are not notable. In order for the station's staff members to be listed, those persons must meet the criteria listed at WP:LISTPEOPLE. Articles have been protected to prevent these additions and editors in question blocked when they persistently continue to reinsert inappropriate material. If a name is included in the article in this way, it has to show that it's relevant to the subject by meeting WP:LISTPEOPLE. Just because a station lists its employees doesn't mean Wikipedia needs to as well, and other station articles needing similar cleanup doesn't mean this one doesn't need to be cleaned up, because whenever it's actually discussed on a station article, the end result is the same; the names that don't meet WP:LISTPEOPLE are removed. Wikipedia is also not a directory. See here, here, and here for previous discussions about this. Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 16:09, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable people
Talk:KLFY-TV

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 17:41, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 
Talk:KLRT-TV

message: Can anyone find out if this station was ever owned by Act III Broadcasting?  I recall that stations owned by that company also used the "Prime all the time" slogan. Blueboy96 23:51, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 17:28, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 

message: FOX16 Needs Weekday Morning And Midday Newscasts!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.163.1 (talk) 16:49, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  FOX16 NEEDS WEEKDAY MORNING AND MIDDAY NEWSCASTS! 
Talk:Prix de Rome

message: There is a discrepancy regarding the year Fragonard won the Prix de Rome. Wiki's Fragonard page says he won it in 1752, however, Wiki's Prix de Rome page, in the painting category listing, says he won it in 1758. Which one is correct?
1752 is correct. I will make the correction to this article. Askari Mark | Talk 03:38, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fragonard

message: "Ravel tried a total of five times to win the prize, and the last failed attempt in 1905 was so controversial that it led to a complete reorganization of the administration at the Paris Conservatory". So, why Ravel's name is figured on the laureates list of 1901?? Gerea-en 00:18, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 30-April-2007: Sources say "André Caplet" won 1901 Prix de Rome in music, so I will put "(against Maurice Ravel, 3rd prize)" to adjust; Ravel won 3rd prize, but that was not stated on the short list.  Thanks for the note.  -Wikid77 06:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ravel

message: In 1972 Gérard Grisey seems to have won the Prix de Rome, yet this price was abolished in 1968. Can Grisey still have won this prize? Brbbl (talk) 09:34, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gérard Grisey 

message: Does anyone know if there's a reason why architecture lists Deuxième/Troisieme awards while painting only lists the first prize winner? (Other than the massive effort involved in compiling all of that extra information, of course). VernoWhitney (talk) 14:02, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curious about the number of listed winners 

message: The French page lists the subject for the students (for instance, 1788 subject was "the Death of Tatius"), the same should be done with the lists for the English page.  Along side each winner.  Informata ob Iniquitatum (talk) 09:00, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Annual subject 
Talk:KMSB

message: While following some old vandal edits from an IP on a page in my scope of wiki stuff, I stumbled onto this series of edits.  Too much has been done since for me to just revert and none of it is sourced.  But I'm making an attempt write now to clean up some of the ick that guy left behind.  I'm sure it needs way more attention but I'm not actually from the related area so I'm just cleaning up bad sentences as best I can.  Someone fact check me and all of that. Millahnna (mouse)talk 05:08, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: On second though I'm just gonna flat out delete the three weird paragraphs that guy added. Millahnna (mouse)talk 05:10, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wonky Writing
Talk:KMTP-TV

message: This article needs to me merged with KQEC-TV.  Other stations that had an unrelated license on that channel have just one article, like WKBF and WQHS.  Also, the articles are nearly identical, except KQEC has less about KMTP.  We only need one article on this, and KMTP-TV should be it.  --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:46, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: Regarding Languages:  I'm not sure if KMTP shows any more German programs, like DW news & shows they used to broadcast overnight.  They do show the RAI International news, which is from Italy.  Might be best to indicate that's more than just Asian languages  --SFTheWanderer 18:02, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other 

message: KMTP 32.2 World Channel appears to have a website http://www.worldchannelus.com/
Should it be linked onto the home page?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.18.217.149 (talk) 21:52, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: World Channel
Talk:Hwang (Soulcalibur)

message: Seeing as how there are so many people in the world named Hwang for example, the Korean geneticist who claimed to have been the first to clone someone, the Korean soccer player, etc etc... it seems to me that the way to differentiate them would be do add their names to the page.  If two people have the same name exactly, then perhaps listing their primary occupation in parenthesis is most prudent.  But here we just have Hwang (Soul Edge), which is flawed in so many ways.  Many people don't even know that Soul Edge existed in the first place.  This would be like a page for Jin Kazama called Kazama (Tekken III).  I'm going to change it back.Bethereds 19:34, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ever play Soul Edge, the FIRST in the series?  Announcer says his whole name..... and.. what are you trying to match to?  And also.. his surname is Hwang, but that's besides the point.Bethereds 14:29, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Come to think of it - I seem to remember the announcer saying Hwang's full name (the only character who's full name was stated) so I'll back down on this article. But Yun-Seong and Han Myong's pages are still incorrect. Mr.bonus 18:16, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The name of this page

message: Okay, this is pretty much just like the old character analysis section from before. I'm removing these for the same reason people from before deleted the character analysis section. If you want to find out why, check out Taki's and Kilik's talk pages. If people want a strategy guide, they should go to fansites. Mythmonster2 (talk) 06:23, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gameplay
Talk:Karen (Pokémon)

message: Many of the Elite Four articles don't have much substance to them; why this one keeps being singled out is beyond me. This one certainly looks worse due to the fact that information about Karen's Pokemon has been removed by a previous edit, but such listings have remained in all of the other articles (such as Will (Pokémon)).
If any merging is to take place, it needs to be a bit more planned-out and coordinated. WarpstarRider 23:28, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge suggestion 

message: I have removed the link on this name, since the corresponding Wicki page is about the country and people of Persia.--Iggle 05:24, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed! --Celestianpower háblame 19:28, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Persian 

message: Please bring up to standard. ---J.S (t|c) 22:57, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:V is not meet
Talk:KVOA

message: I have moved this article from KVOA-TV to KVOA. Consensus on both WP:NC#Broadcasting and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations#Article_names is that the article name should reflect the actual call letters of the TV station. As can be seen here:  the call letters for this station are in fact KVOA. Any concerns regarding this topic would be best addressed here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations. —A 08:41, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 
Talk:Creators of Intense Art

message: All the downloads from textfiles.com are raising alarms with my virus scanner. ashleedawg (talk) 00:20, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malware?
Talk:Kilakarai

message: Don't add your family stories. Hsadam48 (talk) 16:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editors
Talk:W07CL

message: It needs to be conclusively determined whether or not this station still
broadcasts any UATV programming. I'll try calling the station
again soon if I can't find another information source. I hope this
doesn't get too close to original research. AlexDW 12:46, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the UATV article, UATV has temporarily suspended operations due to lack of satellite time. If W07CL was still carrying an UATV programming before, it certainly isn't now. AlexDW 16:23, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  UATV still here? 

message: Page was blanked due to lack of citation of sources. Information regarding history of station can be found in The Evening Star Newspaper (KPC News) Auburn Indiana, Thursday July 3, 2003, on pages A1 and A12. This also establishes that the station meets the notability guideline specified at Wikipedia:Notability (media), which states "A station which was formerly an originating station in its own right but which now exists only as a rebroadcaster of another service is treated as an originating station because of its history." Redirect is being removed for this reason. If there are further issues to be addressed, please add a banner to the top of the article. Also, the station is affiliated with other broadcasters besides 3ABN, so the redirect is no longer accurate.
208.119.144.253 (talk) 19:44, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleting redirect
Talk:WFWA

message: I have moved this article from WFWA to WFWA-TV. Consensus on both WP:NC#Broadcasting and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations#Article_names is that the article name should reflect the actual call letters of the TV station. As can be seen here:  the call letters for this station are in fact WFWA. Any concerns regarding this topic would be best addressed here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations. —A 08:27, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: I distinctly remember as a child watching Sesame Street on WPTA-21 during the early 1970s.  Back then, there was no Good Morning America on ABC yet in those years.  WPTA aired Sesame Street as a market-differentiator from the Today Show on WKJG-33.  Captain Kangeroo was on WANE-15.  (Sorry, I don't remember what else was on WANE-15/CBS back then, other than I have a vague memory of a news program, perhaps with Bob Schieffer.)  I remember WPTA-21 carrying Sesame Street because there was a big crisis in my young life:  When WBGU-39 went live, I was no longer able to watch Sesame Street.  WBGU-39's signal was so weak that we could not receive it 15 miles north of Fort Wayne until my father seriously upgraded our antenna (plus amplifier & filter) so that I could watch Sesame Street again.  All told, I experienced an approximately one-month unavailability of Sesame Street from the time that WPTA-21 stopped airing Sesame Street once the WBGU-39 repeater went live to the time that my father bought & installed the new antenna and bought & installed the new amplifier & filter on that antenna. —optikos (talk) 06:18, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  At least 1 PBS program on commercial stations in Fort Wayne
Talk:WGTE-TV

message: The February 9 edit added a history section that was a carbon copy of the station's history page.  Had to revert back to Bearcat's previous version to get rid of the copyright violation.  Blueboy96 04:53, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:WINM

message: I have moved this article from WINM to WINM-TV. Consensus on both WP:NC#Broadcasting and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations#Article_names is that the article name should reflect the actual call letters of the TV station. As can be seen here:  the call letters for this station are in fact WINM. Any concerns regarding this topic would be best addressed here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations. —A 08:39, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name