lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Henry Hall (lighthouse keeper)

message: At the time of writing, the Henry Hall page begins with the "importance" template, reading "This article lacks information on the importance of the subject matter. If you are familiar with it, please expand the article, or discuss its significance on the talk page."
Certainly the lighthouse involved is famous, and it is possibly responsible for considerable advances in lighthouse construction technology. Indeed, Eddystone was something I clearly remember being taught about at primary school in the UK, so importance has been attached to it within the mainstream.
However, does Henry Hall deserve his own page? Since the Eddystone page goes to the trouble of saying "see Henry Hall for the full story", and leaves an obvious gaping hole in the history of the lighthouse on that page, I'd suggest this text should simply be incorporated into the Eddystone page (which isn't particularly long). – Kieran T (talk | contribs) 17:26, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance / location of this info 

message: This article claimed that Mr. Hall died of lead poisoning, as did the article on the Eddystone Lighthouse.  He likely no more died of lead poisoning than did George Cornell (who was shot by the Kray brothers).  The claim was first made in the article on the lighthouse, and is without support in the cited sources.  The assertion therefore has been removed from the lighthouse article and from this one.  See Talk:Eddystone_Lighthouse#Swallowing_lead.  Kablammo (talk) 14:57, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lead poisoning"
Template talk:Liverpool F.C. squad

message: For all current LFC players, loaned in or out, with a squad number. ArtVandelay13 17:28, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

message: I note that some of the other squad templates include players that don't currently have a number (which is why I thought it alright to add Kirkland and Diao, now that they've returned to the club). Is it generally preferred not to do this, hence the removal of my additions? Seb Patrick 10:25, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seemed to be the norm when the templates began, although a few have taken to adding non-numbered players. Personally, I think it looks neater, and it seems like a good measure of whether a player is in the squad or not - i.e., if you don't have a number, you can't play. So when next season's squad is announced, anyone likely to play will get a number, and the problem will resolve itself. Of course, these are just my thoughts on the matter, it's not set in stone if enough people feel differently. ArtVandelay13 11:13, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah, cool, fair enough. I just wasn't sure what the accepted norm was. As you say, it's not really worth doing anything now until the new season starts and the new numbers are given out... Seb Patrick 11:53, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say that at this pre-season time, it's right to include those without a squad number.  Examples I can mention are from Kirkland, Carson and Bellamy, all should be considered part of the current LFC squad, none of whom yet have a squad number.  SLUMGUM  yap  stalk  15:31, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, I concede on the squad numbers issue. I guess the longer I kept Bellamy off the list, the longer I could convince myself he hadn't joined. :) Don't forget to add the template to the players' pages though. ArtVandelay13 17:06, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

text:  I agree, but I think that when the season starts and squad numbers are handed out, we should then remove any players who haven't been given one. Seb Patrick 08:32, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I've changed my mind over including loaned-out players, so I am removing the note. All the players without squad numbers seem to be members of the current squad.   SLUMGUM  yap  stalk  22:37, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Squad numbers only"

message: I have posted a 3RR message on the editor's page who has been repeatedly adding BR's name today. Although there is increasing speculation there is also cautionary words being used and there is no confirmation of an appointment to the Liverpool Manager's job as at this time.Tmol42 (talk) 21:00, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. There is also no confirmation on the LFC website. The Swansea website just says that they need to sort out compensation, which could break down. BBC says that LFC could announce their new manager within the next 24 hours, so I'd suggest you wait until then. Mr tim111 (talk) 21:02, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Malarious is still edit warring and being rude to everyone im on 2 reverts of him now--Lerdthenerd wiki defender 21:07, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brendan Rodgers
Talk:John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County

message: Since the hospital is public there cannot be any violations; it is a public not-for-profit entity hence public domain/fair use applies.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnimeMagic2112 (talk • contribs) 19:26, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public Hospital = Public Domain 

message: This is/was a real hospital, not a fictional one.  (The hospital in ER may have been based on Cook County.)
The hospital in ER was based upon the old CCH. I threw in a reference to Season 15, episode 16 (aired Feb 19, 2009) to the address on a package delivered to the fictitious hospital--1835 West Harrison.  This is the address to the old CCH medical department used in medical journal references and by individual doctors at the hospital.  The 1901 address cited in the article is the general address.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.6.229 (talk) 04:01, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: This sentence as it is written:
In 1986, Agnes D. Lattimer was appointed medical director of Cook County Hospital, making the hospital in loving memory of him the first African American woman medical director of a major American hospital.[5]
........makes absolutely no sense. "Making the hospital in loving memory of him the first African American woman medical director".....hopefully you can see the problem.
:Yeah, that creeped in as part of a bad edit last September. Fixed. Thanks for pointing it out. oknazevad (talk) 15:21, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  makes no sense
Talk:Selberg class

message: I'm confused about the need for an ε in condition ii). Should this not be "a_n =O( n^{r+\epsilon}) for some fixed positive real number r and any ε>0"?
Is (iii) right? It looks backwards to me.
I'm  used to seeing phi(z) = gamma factor times original Dirichlet series, then the functional equation is phi(z) = <some number of absolute value 1> times the complex conjugate of phi(1 - complex conjugate of z) Virginia-American (talk) 02:48, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The statement about Fχ can't be right if χ is nontrivial. Take for example F(s)=L(s,\overline\chi), which is in the Selberg class. Then F^\chi(s)=L(s,\overline\chi\chi) is the Dirichlet L-function of an imprimitive principal character, and therefore not in the Selberg class.—Emil J. 23:41, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked Selberg’s paper. The definition of Fχ is correct, however, he does not say that Fχ is S. He says that if Fχ is in S, then something happens (conjecturally).—Emil J. 16:23, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples
Talk:2006 FA Cup final

message: A merge with FA Cup 2005-06 was proposed by User:Ed g2s but no reason was given. I am opposed to the merger because (1) the size of the combined article would be huge (2) The Final article is all about one single match, and contains (or will contain) detailed info pertinent only to this match. It warrants a full article, as other finals have. Slumgum | yap | stalk | 17:43, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I concur with Slumgum. The purpose of the 2 articles is not the same and neither would be improved by the proposed merger. leaky_caldron 20:59, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Several FA Cup Finals have their own pages already. If anything, some formating (players box especially) should be imported from these. 81.107.34.65 10:23, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I also agree with the above comments. (What a great final it was!) ShizuokaSensei 12:08, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Another tag unaccompanied by an explanation.  No reason was given and I really can't spot any POV so I have removed the tag.  There does appear to be more information relating to Liverpool in the lead, but I think that is reflective of the news at the time. Before anyone asks, I am not a Liverpool fan. ;o)  Slumgum T. C.   00:47, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 
Talk:List of mammals described in the 2000s

message: This article is very incomplete. Have a look at the subpages of nl:Gebruiker:Ucucha/Nieuw: there are many more new species described in this century. Ucucha (talk) 18:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very incomplete 

message: There's the Grey-faced Sengi, where should that be put? Lampman (talk) 18:40, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New species 

message: what is the definition of a species?  Are wolves different from dogs?  Different breeds of dogs?  Different races of humans?  A clean division would seem to be based on inability to mate and create viable offspiring.  But the desire to preserve diversity (and the Endangered Species Act) has driven recognition of several animals that are able to cross-breed as individual species.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.82.32.84 (talk) 15:34, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  definition of species 

message: How is the discovery and description of new species of mammals within the scope of alternative views?  --Aranae (talk) 13:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative views?

message: It seems that List of mammals described in 21st century should be merged with this. Or perhaps into a new article called something like "Mammals described in the 21st Century"? It seems to sound less ambiguous, perhaps Zujua (talk) 09:19, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:The Crocketts

message: "Rock" and not "cow-punk"? Has mr Bigbluefish listened to much crox? Technically I guess it should be banana country punk. No idea, but... source (label), aannd source (channel 4) --144.124.16.33 17:52, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but Wikipedia doesn't go that way. You need to CITE AND REFERENCE your sources. [Mac Δαvιs] ❖ 08:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:History of Ahmedabad

message: I removed this sentence: 
:The famous one line about ahmedabad is "JAB KUTTE PE SASSA AAYA TAB BADSHAH NE SHAHAR BASAYA..."
It isn't in English, it isn't cited in a footnote and it could be inaccurate or worse. It can certainly be restored with a citation and translation. Reconsideration (talk) 00:12, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed this sentence with no English translation
Talk:List of Jason Varitek's awards

message: I think we should merge the information into Jason Varitek before speedy deleting the article. --Zpb52 17:59, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

message: OK, originally I had the two together, and it was suggested via Wikipedia:Good Article that they be seperated so i did that (please see Talk:Jason Varitek). Now people want it merged. It doesn't really bother me either way, but since with both parts together it didn't pass I was trying to model the format after the French Military History featured article the other day (it has a page of just a list of battles). Zzz345zzz 18:41, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As a Sox fan I support the merge. Doesn't seem right for something like this to be hanging by itself. Yanksox 19:08, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree. --Disavian 04:52, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I would merge the two sections while removing a few awards, such as perhaps summarizing the Georgia Tech records with something like "he lead Georgia Tech in career games played (253), career runs scored (261),..." etc, and removing things such as the 1994 college awards, perhaps. --Pseudolus42 19:20, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Tek is the man, but I cannot see a reason for a separate article for his awards... --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 23:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding Merge
Talk:Kingsmeat

message: There has been a notability query on this story for a while.  In the absence of evidence that the story is notable, the article should be changed to a redirect to the collection in which it appears. Guy who reads a lot (talk) 14:52, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed. Guy who reads a lot (talk) 20:09, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable?
Talk:Continental Baths

message: I do think that the Continental Baths are noteworthy enough to need it's own page, if only so Gay Baths doesn't get cluttered JayKeaton 18:15, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: To who put the citation note. Please put here what you would like to be cited and I will look for applicable citations to put here. If any citations I put are not satisfactory please say and I will look for more reputable citations or contact experts in related fields. If such notes are not put here within a decent amount of time I will remove the citation note as I will assume that the evidence given has been enough. thank you JayKeaton 11:48, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: What is "A-200" that was referred to as being available?
:I think this was "A200" lice killing shampoo product detail. I'll add this as a link based on my assumption (though I'm not too familiar with USA brands so it's a bit of guesswork). -- Ashley VH 04:09, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What is A-200?

message: Kudos to Ashleyvh for his amazing work on this page JayKeaton 00:04, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Much appreciated - according to my better half, I spent far too much time over the holidays on Gay bathhouse and this page was a neat spin-off.-- Ashley VH 00:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big improvement 

message: The pool and sauna area located in the basement of the Ansonia was also at one time a gay bathhouse called the "Ansonia 73", some time during the 1970s, I think.  I know for sure it was there, just not sure about the dates. Much later, that space was also converted into a temporary retail space for Tower Records in 1994/1995 while they were renovating their space on 66th Street and Broadway (they just covered over the pool, I guess.  Or not.)  Another interesting purported factoid I remember hearing was a claim that Johnny Weissmuller once practiced in it's Olympic sized pool, although I can't find any verification at all for that.  I can't find anything online about the Ansonia 73 except a mention that there was a commercial for it in a 1974 movie entitled Midnight Blue Collection, Volume 3. I guess a way to validate it is to find an ad for the place in the Village Voice, another local paper, or in a gay publication/guide of the period. Maybe the Continental Baths was just renamed/re-themed for a while as an attempt to gain back customers? Does anyone remember the place, or have any further information?  Becksguy 23:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ansonia 73 

message: I wanted to perpetuate here that in 1973, in New York for an academic meeting (Modern Language Association), stayed there overnight (you could do this in gay bathhouses, if you paid for the time, though not many did),  asked for a receipt, turned it in to the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and got reimbursed. Also turned in the address (not the name) for the "Who's Where" service at the meeting. Hell, UNC'd already fired me, what else could they do? deisenbe (talk) 13:52, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Staying there
Talk:Optimates

message: Does this page need a link with populares? They were meant to be opposing parties. Also, I'm not sure where this would go, but there has been a lot of recent scholarship discussion about the terms "optimates" and "populares" - it is now a fair consensus that they were not parties as we see the term, but more degrees of a way of working. Many of the optimates used fairly popularist (not sure that's the right word but...) tactics at some point in their careers, or at least could use populares politicians for their own ends. It sometimes sounds as if they were opposed parties - it was more a way of doing things. However, this might be a bit in-depth as it would involved a lot of names and scholarship debates...Tbarker 10:56, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  populares vs "optimates 

message: A discussion about a merger of this article with Populares is taking place here. T8612 (talk) 13:34, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with Populares
Talk:Roger Boas

message: OK, I believe that I fixed it.  You can remove the clean-up tag if you want.
* I've further cleaned up the article, and removed the tag. Hopefully the improved version will satisfy you, too! :) - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 07:00, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old cleanup discussion

message: Five edits were made today , stripping out the documented conviction of Mr. Boas and replacing it with glowing descriptions of his public life.  Some of the latter may be well-deserved, but the promotional language and peacock terms are contrary to our style.  The edits were made by a new user who has chosen the subject of this article as his user name:  Rogerboas (talk).  His other 9 edits today all relate to Roger Boas as well.  I'll go put a welcome template on his talk page.  If he comes back here, he should read WP:NPOV and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest before making any substantive edits similar to those removed. --Hjal (talk) 07:31, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The user identifies themselves as Jena and I'm attempting to explain the situation to them.  Some of the content they added looked fine but obviously, the whitewashing isn't.  Hopefully they can come contribute to the article as it appears they have useful content to contribute. OlYeller21Talktome 21:35, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

text: I think the issue is more with your complete removal of the child molestation charges. OlYeller21Talktome 23:35, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Self"-promotion?
Talk:Lacryma Christi

message: This should be merged with LACHRYMA CHRISTI, as it's the same article.
:Yes, they should be merged. According to Burton Anderson, Wine atlas of Italy (1990), p. 271, the modern official spelling is this (Lacryma Christi) without the h. But it may well have varied. Andrew Dalby 20:15, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  MERGE suggested 

message: It would be informative, if anyone has this information, to list the grape variety types in these Lacryma Christi wines.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spope3 (talk • contribs) 03:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grape Varieties? 

message: Maybe we should mention that 'lacrima' is the word for 'tear' in both Latin and Italian, and that the plural 'tears' is lacrimae/lacrime.  'Lacrima' is extensively used by wine makers.John Wheater (talk) 11:41, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Talk:Aoba-ku, Yokohama

message: In Kunrei-shiki, the official romanization system, du is written zu. See: http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Kunrei-shiki 
Kunrei-shiki is the official romanization system, though the Hepburn system is the de facto system used outside of Japan. 
:Kunrei-shiki is based on the older Nihon-shiki (Nipponsiki) system, modified for modern standard Japanese. For example, the word かなづかい, romanized kanadukai in Nihon-shiki, is pronounced kanazukai in modern Japanese, and Kunrei-shiki uses the latter spelling. 
The Hepburn system, though not the official system, is more widely used. http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Hepburn
Both Kunrei-shiki and the Hepburn system use zu to romanize づ. Greenw47 18:35, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Romanizatio of づ
Talk:Jamestown, Wisconsin

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—Topeka Sam (talk) 18:51, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tweaked the coordinates to indicate a point roughly at the center of the town. Deor (talk) 23:14, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error - two sets of coordinates differ. conceivably OK because the town is many square miles in area
Talk:CZ 82

message: I added the discontinued status of the CZ 83 in the US, the 9mm P.A. rubber model, and the types of rifling.
--JohnMc (talk) 13:02, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions

message: Added picture, wikified, and added category.--Asams10 18:40, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I have moved the article from vz.82 page to vz. 82, correct designation with space, as seen, for example on this page (in czech, but space between "vz." and "82" is quite visible, I hope)--ja_62 13:39, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move explanation 

message: I'd like to ask Echo5charlie not to move this page to vz.82 (without space between "vz." and "82") as he have done several times e.g. here . His unreferenced moving is not quite clever thing, and his accusation towards me, that my moving was unsourced and vandalism is quite stupid lie, especially when he kept my reference to correct variant of designation in the article. thanks --ja_62 15:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving this page 

message: The title of this article should be in English as this is the English language version of Wikipedia. Any comments? Please read WP:EN. --Nukes4Tots (talk) 07:37, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Violation of [[WP:EN]]
Template talk:Missing rationale

message: Based on Template:Image source, see  for contribtor history prior to 18:42, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

message: What is everybody's opinion on the big graphic that is at the top of this tag? It seems a bit too much to me. No other warning tag has a big "This file may be deleted" warning at the top. If there are no objectios, I may remove it.↔Nmajdan 01:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Graphic notice

message: Obviously if the rationale given is invalid, the image is deletable in seven days, so I've altered this template to match that. --Tony Sidaway 02:18, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted your change. If the rationale is invalid, a different template should be used. --GentlemanGhost 18:41, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Betacommandbot uses this template, but often it tags invalid fair use things because it cannot tell the difference.  Because BCBot makes up most of the uses of this template, it might make sense to add a note about invalid rationales (specifically a link to the article, although there are legitimate reasons not to directly say that right on the user's talk page--I don't want to go into them right now).  Please consider unreverting.  --Thinboy00's sockpuppet alternate account 00:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing ''or'' invalid
Talk:New London, Wisconsin

message: Please see discussion at Talk:New London. --Polaron | Talk 02:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to redirect "New London" to "New London, Connecticut" 
Talk:Park Falls, Wisconsin

message: It is apparent that the link for Rob Weber was added by Rob himself as a personal plug.  If it can be shown that he has provided a widely acknowledged contribution to his field or is in some other way notable then perhaps he should remain.  It appears, however, even from his own personal page that he is a software engineer for a small niche company in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, which is not sufficient justification for notability.  It is further inappropriate for Rob or presumably his IP, being responsible for the later reverts, to be adding his own information.  aremisasling (talk) 14:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rob Weber 