Talk:List of papal bulls

message: The following list was removed from the Papal bull article as it is redundant with this article. There may be some from this list that need to be incorporated into this article. -- Stbalbach 21:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List from [[Papal bull]]

message: Regarding two edits (, ) by User:Yuioplkjhga, which I have just reverted: I am no authority on either bull. Still, before modifying this list, it seems reasonable to modify the bulls' own articles. Get a consensus there (among people to whom these bulls are of interest), and then modify the list. — Itai (talk) 11:14, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dum Diversas and Romanus Pontifex 

message: Folks -- I've added a reference to this one. Hopefully I've at least got the date right. It reads Millesimo Quadringentesimo L sexto duodecimo kalendas Iulii. It's more commonly known (and titled) as Bulla Turcorum, but it seemed to me that the incipit was Cum hiis superioribus annis impius nominis...
Hopefuly someone who understands Latin can decode this. A nice digitized copy of Gutenberg's print of the bull and a transcription of the text (some mistakes) are at the Princeton University Library Digital Collections
Kbs (talk) 05:33, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bulla Turcorum 

message: I dont know the name of this bull, so wouldnt be able to add it in it was in the early 500s (1503 I think) that allowed Princess Catalina/Catherine of Aragon marry Prince Henry of England (later Hnery VIII) they needed the bull as Catherine was Hnery's brother Arthur's widow. Can anyone add it in?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.56.79.248 (talk) 09:25, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing bull 

message: I suggest qualifying the 1296 clericis laicos description of financial prohibitions with the rescinding 1297 Etsi di statu -- both by Boniface VIII. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etsi_de_statu
Webistrator (talk) 03:49, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest adding 'Etsi di statu' to qualify 'Clericis laicos' table description 

message: Should we split the list and make a new article for the ones that are actually just papal letters, not bulls? Or just rename this article and have two separate lists here? Adam Bishop (talk) 10:21, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: One page would probably work for now, though we could potentially also split things up like "Documents of the Catholic Church" by century? --Elonka 21:56, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bulls and letters 

message: These two sources mention a papal bull that was issued in 1696;
* "(...) while the family was still in Julfa, resulted in a papal bull of 1696, granting the family full citizenship of Rome and trading privileges in Rome and other cities." -- Aslanian, Sebouh; Berberian, Houri (2009). "SCERIMAN FAMILY". Encyclopaedia Iranica
* "(...) starting in the 1680s while the family was still in Julfa, resulted in a papal bull of 1696, granting the family trading privileges in Rome, Ancona, Citavecchia, as well as full citizenship in Rome." -- Aslanian, Sebouh (2011). From the Indian Ocean to the Mediterranean: The Global Trade Networks of Armenian Merchants from New Julfa. University of California Press. p 160. .
Couldn't find any further (proper) information and details about it, though. - LouisAragon (talk) 20:53, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: So far, I have found no formal name for the bull. Will keep looking though. Also, I found a particular editor that might be of some assistance. Couldn't hurt to ask. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: , I have Jzsj's talk page is on my watchlist so saw this there: neither of those sources look to be the type that would make the distinction between a bull or a brief and while there could be a formal bull, the sources also might just be saying the Holy See granted X family these rights using bull as shorthand for any grant from the Holy See. In other words, you might be searching for a named document that doesn't actually exist. It also very well could, but the mention of the phrase bull in fields outside of the historical study of early modern Christianity is used very broadly. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:55, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Papal bull of 1696? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of papal bulls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130531034830/http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Ben12/B12bdeus.html to http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Ben12/B12bdeus.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130620170358/http://www.romancatholicism.org/beatus-andreas.htm to http://www.romancatholicism.org/beatus-andreas.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:08, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The apostolic constitution Pascite Gregem Dei 2021 is issued as a bull and might be added. Nysius Isidorus (talk) 07:49, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Pascite Gregem Dei 2021