Talk:Ed, Edd n Eddy/Archive 4

message: I archived it.--Atomic-Super-SuitWhat Have I Done?!  03:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archive 

message: Yay! The edit war is over! --Wack'd About Wiki 19:36, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What edit war?--ASNT 20:59, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

text: If you look through the article's history and this talk page's archive, you see that there was an edit war a month ago on the "cruft" or "fancruft" that was being added to this article and the library vandals who were adding them. It got so bad, that this page had to be protected. Squirepants101 21:05, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's Over? 

message: I just got the Complete 1st season of the 3 Eds on DVD, and the DVD says that "The Ed-Touchables" and "Nagged to Ed" were Episode 2. They were epiosde 1, but I guess they were aired after Episode 2. --Imax80 01:26, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, alot of cartoons air out of order of productio numbers. DietLimeCola 02:39, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode Disorder 

message: Due to the expected season 6 running into 2008, doesn't it mean that Cartoon Network only has to order one more season for the show to last ten years? I wonder if Danny's planning anything special for this potential event... --Wack'd About Wiki 01:24, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please discuss the article.--SUIT42 01:32, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Theres only 6 seasons, no season 7 has been announced, yet anyways.   DietLimeCola 06:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  One More Season 

message: Anything in the show is canon, here we go AGAIN with the non registered person removing stuff.  Must be suffering from an huge ego again. I'm tired of this crap.  All I have to say (again), is HERE WE GO AGAIN!  DietLimeCola 02:14, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh how fun. Black Kat 14:37, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I predicted the future 

message: Hey, check this out, this should bring up some points of interest.  All Eds are Off / Smile for the Ed.  The way UK aires their seasons (as a whole), this means that the rest of Season 5 should be coming it's way in no time.  . DietLimeCola 00:36, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brand new episodes air in the UK! (Never before seen in the US!) 

message: There are many grammar and spelling errors in the Wikiquote article, and I encourage anyone to clean it up whenever possible.  Link 486 @ 8:35 a.m, November 8th, 2006.
Ummmm...WHY ARE YOU STILL LETTING THE WIKIQOUTE SPIRAL FURTHER INTO A STATE OF UNREADABILITY?!!! WHY WON'T SOMEBODY BESIDES ME AT LEAST TRY TO CLEAN IT UP?! Link 486 12:38, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I'm willing to go through it, but I'm having some trouble at home now. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 17:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikiquote Cleanup

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and WP:CONTEXT.
*Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
*Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.See footnote
*Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts into the rest of the article.
*Please alphabetize the interlanguage links.See footnote
*Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
**Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant -  “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
See footnote

*As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]
*The article will need references. See WP:CITE and WP:V for more information.
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. See footnote
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Squirepants101 03:22, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Automated peer review 

message: I tried to add DVD covers to this article, but some IP address removed them. The IP address claimed that, "This has not been released, and even if it has been advertised, unreleased content often undergoes major content revision from what was announced. It does not belong here until it is released.)" Does anyone agree or disagree with that statement? And to the IP address who removed the images, why did you remove the DVD cover for the first season of Ed, Edd n Eddy when it's been released? If the copyright owner or someone else changed the DVD cover, couldn't someone upload a new version of an image as seen in this revision and tag the old one with Template:orfud. I don't see what's wrong with having info on a future DVD release because look at :Category:Future events. All the articles in the category are tagged with Template:Future because they have information about a future event. Does a future DVD release count as a future event? Plus, the future template clearly says that content may change dramatically as the event approaches and more information becomes available. Squirepants101 16:07, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been more than six hours since I posted this and no one has responded. If no one responds within the next few days, including the IP address who removed the images, I am going to re-add them along with the information on the season two DVD. Squirepants101 22:16, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you talking about the vandal who kept adding false information about the Ed, Edd n Eddy movie on articles including Warner Bros. Pictures and Legendary Pictures? If so, that vandal got blocked by Tregoweth for a month. Squirepants101 23:42, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD covers? 

message: This is a bad idea. If you will read the archived discussion pages, you will see that there was concern that the trivia section had grown far too large, and was filled with to many small details, and fancruft. Several agreed that it should be pared down, and it was. Starting a separate section will only encourage editors to begin adding every little instance they can think of once again, which is beyond the scope of an encyclopedia article. -- 71.157.183.100 17:40, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate section for pop culture references 

message: I would say that Ed Edd n Eddy is a Canadian series, not American. As far as I understand, Danny Antonucci is Canadian, and AKA Cartoons is in Canada. Also, they use some Canadian words in the series - 'line-up' instead of 'line', 'show' instead of 'episode'. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yanamal (talk • contribs) 20:22, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian, not American? 

message: I know wikipedia said it's ideal to not have trivia in the article unless it's new, and it does seem better to have facts in the article. I took everything out of the trivia and moved it to the article, along with adding more info about vagueness. Tell me if it seems nicer to have that instead of a trivia section. (Yes, I am 72.47.137.15...I forgot to sign-in.) Black Kat 17:00, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I know that wikipedia said that it is preferred to avoid trivia in articles. Wikipedia:Avoid trivia sections in articles. I also figured that mentioning the theme of a small amount of facts about the characters would be a good idea. If we go without the trivia, we could put what I said back, but if you or anyone else wants to edit it, that's fine. Whatever sounds best is what is ideal to put in the article. Black Kat 19:40, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Sounds good. Black Kat 17:24, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No more trivia

message: I cleaned out the article Peach Creek by delinking some common words, removing fancruft and unverified content, misc. See this. What do you think of the article now? Squirepants101 05:27, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned up [[Peach Creek]] 

message: Has anyone ever noticed that in The Luck of the ed when ed implied the magazines fell in the sewer after in which Edd says the text would be unreadable and then Eddy said Its the pictures im worried about. Is this a reference to pornography?
:Yes, it is. I think Edd even says that that is where the magazines belong...in the sewer. Black Kat 19:06, 3 February, 2007 (UTC)
There is also a similar reference in another episode. When Edd and Eddy are in Ed's room (I think it was the one where Ed gets grumpy over a shoe pebble) Eddy sees a magazine called Chicks Galore. He immediately says, "Ed's been holding out on us!" and begins reading the magazine, only to find it is about baby chickens. It's possible Eddy believed it to be a Porn magazine, what do you guys think
There's an episode, where Kevin reading a magazine called "Bikini Babes".67.175.138.202 03:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt it, what part does this occur though? --Philo  01:26, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Eddy is switching books in Edd's room and Edd is yelling at Eddy.67.175.138.202 22:52, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

text: He said "Sam Hill" not "Sam Hell" DietLimeCola 01:53, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  inapropreote reference 

message: What is the Saw Friend Eddy had to scared Jonny?67.175.138.202 01:57, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saw Friend 

message: Do we really need the episode list here? It makes the page much longer and links to the episode listing anyway. I'm figuring it'll make the article a little neater if not there. Thoughts? Black Kat 19:58, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh yeah, definitely gotta go. No problem with me. Anyone against? --May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 07:09, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode Listing

message: http://www.the3eds.com/viewtopic.php?t=187 Read this... this seems well... interesting DietLimeCola 04:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ed, Edd n Eddy Crossover in May and Alternate endings? 

message: Just a heads up guys, there's an outbreak of fancruft at this article. I have redirected that page to this article but someone keeps reverting it. --Philo  20:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I saw that too, I already reverted it back 3 times but Bob 2.0 AKA Unknown12 keeps bringing it back.  He knows what fancruft is (I explained it to him on the List of Characters talk page).  I consider this vandalism since he knows what he is doing is wrong. DietLimeCola 00:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Urban Rangers]] 

message: shouldn't it be mentioned in the Trivia section that the kids' parents never ever appear on the show? it's an interesting fact. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.25.59.14 (talk) 15:26, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Already mentioned in the second paragraph of the article: "The characters almost never leave the neighborhood, and adults are nowhere to be seen." --Philo  23:00, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

text: There isn't even supposed to be trivia in the first place. Wikipedia doesn't like trivia in developed articles. Black Kat 20:40, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In December, I tried to integrate some of the trivia into the article according to the guideline WP:TRIV, but an IP reverted my edit. Here is the reason why he/she reverted my edit: This is a bad idea. If you will read the archived discussion pages, you will see that there was concern that the trivia section had grown far too large, and was filled with to many small details, and fancruft. Several agreed that it should be pared down, and it was. Starting a separate section will only encourage editors to begin adding every little instance they can think of once again, which is beyond the scope of an encyclopedia article. Can someone tell me how this would encourage editors to begin adding every little instance they can think of once again? Squirepants101 17:23, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To me, it seemed fine. After awhile, it would build into a better section anyway. Building this is much more ideal to wikipedia than to have a trivia section. I don't know why they changed it. All I can think of is trying to do something like start a "theme" section or something like that. Wikipedia would much rather have a new section that fits smoothly into the article than a list of trivia. Overall, what you did was fine. Black Kat 20:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  an addition to trivia 

message: Hey, There hasn't any new episodes of Ed, Edd n Eddy since August 2006. Has Ed Edd n Eddy been Cancelled in the US?67.175.138.202 19:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, there's a season 6 coming up soon. I'm not sure when they will be aired...they're probably still being made. There are already some unaired episodes that have been described. Black Kat 15:42, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cancelled in the US

message: I think it should be worth noting that each person in the show has their own musical tune.  Edd's tune is a bit more of a smoothish pace with a light tune.  Eddy's is somewhat of a faster tempo and played at a lower pitch.
:Give us a source and we'll include it. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 19:58, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music for each character 

message: Do you think we should put both USA and Canada, then? It says where it originated from, not produced in. Though it's aired for the US, it did originate in the Canada. What do you think? Black Kat 14:02, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Country of Origin

message: half of the sources at the bottom of the page are the exact same webpage. can somebody sort this? --Philo  01:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: I don't see how this helps in any way to support this article. All it says is that someone wrote a bad review, and that the magazine caved after fan protest. It doesn't help support anything that is published in the article. -- Elaich 14:40, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical reaction 

message: I looked at the Ed Edd n Eddy page and saw that the last 3 sections of the article were gone- one of these sections contained crucial information. When I went to the "edit page" section, the missing stuff was there! So, I retyped it, and looked at a preview of the page that still had those sections missing! Is this a glitch or did someone rig the Ed Edd n Eddy page? Kikiluvscheese 19:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, seems to be fine now. Apparently in the last few edits a peace of code was missed. Nothing to worry about. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 19:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's Wrong? 

message: Is it necessary to have this statement in the cultural references section?
"in the episode entitled "an ed is born" eddy mentions steven spielberg. though he refers to him as just "spielberg""
I believe it is irrelevent and will only encourage other editors to add things like that. Eventually, that cultural reference section would grow so large, that it would have to be tagged with Toomuchtrivia (see WP:TRIV). Most of the cultural references listed would be counted as fancruft (see Talk:List of characters in Ed, Edd n Eddy for the "rules"). The section would also violate WP:NOT. Squirepants101 21:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Steven Spielberg]]?