lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pennsylvania Route 299

message: Based on the text, nothing actually needs to be updated. The highway designation still exists, if only on the bridge over the rail line. On that basis, it wasn't decommissioned in 2011, just drastically shortened. That means that the headers in the infobox should stay green (still exists), the marker should still appear at the top (even if unsigned now, it was signed at one point), and the text accurately reflects that situation.
Now, if it has been converted to a Quadrant Route, then changing the text and graphic would be appropriate, but we'd need to also update the text of the article to reflect that change, and provide a source to that effect. Otherwise, the infobox appears to be accurate at the present. Imzadi 1979 →  23:57, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding unsigned vs. signed highways: Interstate 296 and M-155 are each currently unsigned, but since they were signed, they have their markers at the top of the infobox. M-331 has never been signed, so it lacks a marker at the top of its infobox. M-554 was not signed by MDOT, but the City did put up street blades, so its infobox has a street sign graphic instead. Imzadi 1979 →  23:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: PennDOT inventories the Powell Avenue bridge over the railroad tracks as SR 0299, so it is a regular traffic route and not a quadrant route. It just happens to be a traffic route that is solely a bridge over a railroad line (there are many other examples of quadrant routes that consist only of bridges, sometimes multiple bridges along a single locally-maintained road). The shield should remain to convey that PA 299 was once signed as a longer route and the header should remain green since its still active despite being much shorter than it was. Dough4872 00:06, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating the article
Talk:South Florida Regional Transportation Authority

message: What's a "federal" public transit authority?  I'm pretty sure this agency is not run by the federal govt.  --Nricardo 21:39, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Federal authority? 

message: It struck me while reading this article that there is little usefullness in a station listing that included all stations organized by county but not by which system they are on (and they are seperate systems, run by seperate agencies). So I was going to reorder them by system, but then I realized that that is something that belongs in each individual system's article. And lo and behold they are already there. So I decided to be bold and just deleted the list. The info is linked in the respective articles. oknazevad (talk) 05:21, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station listings
Talk:Vivian Hsu discography

message: I like the idea of making a separate page for the discography. When I will try to go over the filmography soon I will probabely do it in the same way. Maybe an experienced user could tell whether this is commensurate to Wiki-customs. Reason for my recent changes to the layout: the headlines appeared closer to the paragraph above than to the belonging text. Furthermore I added "singles" to the "albums" headline. -- WikiVivian 21:42, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Here's a link to the songs in the Love Vivian collection:
http://www.books.com.tw/exep/cdfile.php?item=0020116082
For ease of making the Chinese characters. I'm disinclined to make a page as I wouldn't know where to start, though.
- Jeff 209.161.220.5 01:06, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can make a separate album page. Pandacomics 01:41, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Love Vivian
Talk:True's shrew mole

message: No kidding, I really need an answer to this question.  Is it concidered to be one of the "True Moles"?  What about Desmans, are they "True Moles"?  Is it possible to be a "True Mole" without truely being a mole? Chrisrus (talk) 02:23, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is True's Shrew Mole a true shrew, a true shrew-mole, a true mole, or a "True Mole"?
Talk:Sulawesi flying fox

message: This species, according to the Red list has been changed to Vulnerable, from its previous status of least concern. I have edited in the text; however does anyone know how to edit the IUCN status in the information box, that is located just above the scientific classification portion Dbrad123 (talk) 19:38, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update IUCN Status 

message: You are off to a great start! I think the lead paragraph could use a little bit more information to grab the readers, but only include the most important facts. There are also a few grammatical errors, just make sure you read through and correct them. Under the 'population' heading, this sentence seems a little abrupt and does not seem to flow. Overall, there definitely needs to be a little more information added to each section, and just make sure the paragraphs flow without any random sentences and be sure that the sources are cited correctly.
Good luck!!
Rharr475 (talk) 14:45, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review
Talk:Liam Weldon

message: This artist has released a number of albums and written well-known songs. He has been referenced by significant people in the Irish tradition. Hence, I have removed the tags.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seamasmac (talk • contribs) 20:32, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?
Talk:1997 British Grand Prix/to do

message: This article is a Formula One race report. For editing guidelines on style and structure, please take a look at the Example race report.
Report
*Start writing a report by adding race highlights or a summary.
*Expand the report with sections for pre-race, practice, qualifying and post-race.
*Cleanup the "Notes" section.
*Write a good lead section.
*Cleanup and copyedit the report.
Results
Please list your sources when verifying results.
*Verify the race results and add a reference.  Added using Formula One Database. Eddie6705 18:32, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Machine Robo Rescue

message: Someone listed her real name as Haruka Suzusaki under Haruka characters but I can't find Suzusaki listed on this page. For the moment I will change it to Haruka Rin, with a fact tag next to the Suzusaki until someone can find evidence, in which case please list it in her entry here. Tyciol (talk) 04:15, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Haruka Rin]]

message: There's an incomplete web novel in the official website:http://www.sunrise-inc.co.jp/mrr/novel/ . Can somebody give or contribute any info about this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MRRfreak (talk • contribs) 11:12, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Web Novel

message: Hello, the text indicate "It aired on TV Tokyo from January 8, 2003 to January 3, 2004, having a total of 13 episodes.", or the infobox and ANN indicate 53. There is an error ? Add a precision ? (sorry for my english). Cordially,--Gratus (talk) 18:29, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number
Talk:Shangri-La's Mactan Resort & Spa, Cebu

message: This article makes the assertion of being the 'largest and most exclusive resort' in the Philippines. With 546 rooms, this comes under the 562 rooms of the Waterfront Cebu City Hotel and Casino and this link. So it is obviously not the largest, and as to exclusive, that is entirely an 'opinion' (which is not referenced. --Russavia 21:59, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim to being the largest 

message: Removed duplicate section on awards in the introduction. Should sound less like an advertising with some minor edits. ThoughtsOnMiles (talk) 18:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned up awards
Talk:Hispanic Americans in World War II

message: I found this article while looking for a FA to compare with another article up for review and at a quick glance it no longer meets the FA criteria for 1c. I'll check back in a while to see if these issues have been resolved. Kirk (talk) 22:57, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Source issues

message: Sorry, but it seems controversial the adjetive of Hispanic for francoist general Manuel Goded, in despite of the fact he was born in Puerto Rico. At this epoch (1882) this island was a province of Spain, in the same way that Madrid, Tarragona, Biscay or every other. All the natives of Puerto Rico were Spaniards, it's to say, with Spanish nationality. General Goded was from Catalan roots, as is indicated by his two last names. The professional members of the Spanish Army, Guardias de Asalto (republican police corps) or Guardia Civil (republican, prerepublican and post republican constabularies) and also other members of the government, were periodically moved from one place to other, and because this the born place was, and till is, merely casual.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.156.63.56 (talk) 18:44, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I am also sorry, but Puerto Rican citizenship was granted by Spain in 1897 to those born in the island. As a matter of fact the Puerto Rican citizenship replaced the Spanish citizenship that Puerto Ricans held at the time in 1898. This citizenship was reaffirmed by the United States Supreme Court in 1904 by its ruling in Gonzales v. Williams which denied that Puerto Ricans were United States citizens and labeled them as noncitizen nationals. Therefore, General Manuel Goded was a Puerto Rican who eventually became a citizen of Spain. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:40, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Goded
Talk:Jonathan Fishbein

message: Proper sourcing is necessary for this potentially contentious page. Further information is available at nevirapine. Espresso Addict 22:03, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Brief comments

message: I've reverted a series of edits by . The reasons include:
* The information about an "undisclosed settlement" is unsourced.
* The material on a Congressional investigation doesn't seem to be sourced.
* The information on HIVNET012 was removed. If we detail Fishbein's allegations about HIVNET012, then it seems reasonable to close the circle with a sentence or two on the Institute of Medicine's review of the trial, which was after all occasioned in large part by Fishbein's allegations.
Thoughts? MastCell Talk 05:11, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 
Template talk:Michael Jackson songs

message: Is the "Come Together" listed here a Beatles cover, or some other song? The Hero of This Nation (talk) 13:10, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is the Single About 9/11? | helpdןǝɥ | 23:10, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: don't add * "Chicago"
* "A Place with No Name"
* "Slave to the Rhythm"
to singles of "Xscape (album)" album  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahmedunbreakabletato (talk • contribs) 16:45, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chicago,A Place With No Name and Slave To The Rhythm aren't singles yet 

message: Navboxes should be short and simple. This one can be improved by keeping the years merged into the decades and by merging the two "Other" groups into one. DrKay (talk) 13:23, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many groups
Talk:Short-palated fruit bat

message: According to this study the genus contents now 3 species
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1631069113003119
--Melly42 (talk) 18:54, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: No more monotypic
Talk:A. K. M. Adam

message: For what it's worth, I longer teach at Seabury-Western; when that institution declared financial exigency and ended faculty contracts as of the end of the 2008-09 academic year, I accepted a one-year appointment as Visiting Professor of New Testament at Duke University. And in the "technology" part of the article, I gave a talk -- "The Obscure Convergence of Theological Publishing and Technological Innovation" -- at Ars Electronica 2008 (<http://www.aec.at/podcasts/files/FE_20080906-symp3-01-adam_E.mp3>, <mms://stream.aec.at/webcasts/FE_2008_06_09_Symposium_III_AKMA_Andrew_Adam_E.wmv>). Akma (talk) 14:47, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kung Fu Vampire

message: The previous revision pretty much copied biographical aspects from KFV's website, and other aspects seem to be from fan reviews (reviews by the editor who inserted those sections?) - I have no idea why nobody has tried to delete this yet. I rewrote the article and sourced it. Hopefully it should be fine. The categorization of KFV as a horrorcore or trip hop performer needs reliable sources - if it can be found on Google News, it should be fine. (Sugar Bear (talk) 08:22, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up (November 2008) 
Talk:Hairless bat

message: In the first paragraph, it says that they reside in places with available resources. I would add what those resources are and maybe be more descriptive on the range of the population.
I would simply list the places the bat has hair instead of reiterating that it is mostly hairless. 
The second sentence in the description paragraph needs to be cut into multiple sentences. 
The reproduction section isn't very clear and needs to be reworded. 
All the other sections look pretty good though!
Nateywebb (talk) 02:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cuban funnel-eared bat

message: Despite being labelled Cuban Funnel-eared Bat, the range as given does not include Cuba. I suspect the name is a carry over from before the species was split. According to Burgin, Connor J. et al, Illustrated Checklist of the Mammals of the World, Vol 2, p 190, its English name is Caribbean Lesser Funnel-eared Bat. Please correct. Ptilinopus (talk) 10:30, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misnomer?
Talk:First Reform Government of New Zealand

message: I think what are now known as three different governments (1st Reform, WWI coalition, 2nd Reform) should be seen as one government, namely the Reform Government of New Zealand. Historians generally see them as one government (usually 'the Massey government', but never mind), and besides, it's not consistent to see the wartime coalition as a distinct government from the Reform govts on either side and the administrations from 1999 until now as one government. The depression coalition is probably a special case - it is usually regarded as a distinct government, and obviously was quite close, since it turned into the National Party. --Helenalex 22:25, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. --Lholden 22:37, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And now that I've replaced my stolen laptop, I might actually do this. --Helenalex 00:06, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Progressive revelation (Christianity)

message: I don't believe the article. All main stream christianity claims that the old testament must be interpreted in the light of the message of the new testament, thus according to the article's definition, all christianity is "progressive revelationist". Therefore I believe that the article mumbles away or misunderstands the real 'progressive revelation' concept. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 10:44, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I simply removed the dubious-marked para claiming that orthodoxi and catholici disagree with prog-revel. The concept Progressive revelation seems to occur with two slightly different attitudes: 1. the GT shall be interpreted as observed "through the NT-glasses", 2. it is vain to reinterpret such GT-sayings that contradicts NT-sayings. All christians (by definition) adher to 1., while most reject 2. as either too restrictive or too "liberal" (although in a sense it is not it is actually a thought restriction). Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 11:04, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: I don't think so!
Talk:Galactic Gale Baxingar

message: To the dipshit who thought it was a great idea to change the page name:
Both spellings have been used on toys and other merchandise. But the deciding factor is how it should fit between Braiger and Sasuraiger, which are definitely spelled with a -ger.
It's Baxinger.
17:39, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baxinger vs Baxingar
Talk:STEP Library

message: This article was originally created as Standard Template for Electronic Publishing. jonathon (talk) 04:33, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

message: The only legit STEP format that exists is for CAD design. This format apparently is only used by a few vendors of Bible software, and many of those products don't exist any more. I don't think that this deserves a Wikipedia post, seems more like the author wants to get his name in Wikipedia. This is written more like a product ad.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.189.211.70 (talk) 01:59, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article about CAD design format can be found at Standard for the Exchange of Product model data. There is no legitimate reason for that ISO standard to have two articles. I'll also point out that the only edit Craig Rairdin has made to this article --- replacing vague generalities with specifics. This article was created by somebody who has no affiliation with the organization that formulated this file format. jonathon (talk) 02:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a different format than that used for CAD design.  I'm not sure what basis we would use for deciding that any other format that has been assigned, perhaps foolishly, the same acronym is not "legit."  Let's put a disambiguation sentence on the top, to distinguish this from the ISO standard. EastTN (talk) 15:56, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

text:  In as much as none of the articles (NOTE:Plural) on ISO 10303 do not use the phrase "step library", and the only time that phrase occurs in Wikipedia, is on this page,or those of Bible Study Programs that link here, adding the disambig paragraph seems pointless. jonathon (talk) 22:21, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

text:   More to the point, this article is misnamed.  Standard Template Electronic Publication is not a library, but a specification.  I'd suggest moving it to that name, with "STEP Library" as a redirect to that name.  jonathon (talk) 22:21, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes sense to me. EastTN (talk) 20:17, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Product Ad?
Talk:Gowappa 5 Gōdam

message: I propose a move.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.104.103.216 (talk) 18:36, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this page called Goliath? 
Talk:South Plymouth, Massachusetts

message: Do notice the difference of spelling between the geographical region Pine Hills and the neighborhood The Pinehills. The spelling of both is correct. It does get confusing when people try to reference one or the other. Ed 22:40, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: The lengthy list of neighborhoods should not have been in this article, and thus I removed it. The list of neighborhoods is found at the article page Neighborhoods in Plymouth, Massachusetts. A mention of some villages cvan be found in the lead or a new section, but the list was out of place. Raime 16:14, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of list
Talk:Randy Hillier (politician)

message: Replacing legitimate photos with photoshoped ones, adding "erotic dancer" to list of professions.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.11.171.43 (talk) 01:38, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple malicious edits

message: I've added a section for controversies, I believe his comments about the parents of autistic children should be moved there from the 2019 section.
Also, his global warming views could be added to this section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaddySoFroze (talk • contribs) 21:14, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies  

message: This is confusing because as best I can tell the PPC is not yet registered as a provincial party.  That said, multiple WP:RS say he is running for the PPC.  suggests that Hillier is actually running for "Ontario First" but simply provides this unreliable tweet.  I did a quick google search and I am not seeing support for that in RS, anyone aware of any?  Either way we should keep an eye on this, as it may become clearer as Hillier makes more comments (or if a PPC entity registers in Ontario).--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 20:22, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This unsourced claim that he will be running for "Ontario First" has been added again, this time by an IP User. I have added a citation needed tag but not removed the content.  If it is going to remain in the article, we are going to need a WP:RS.  Leaving the content here without one is likely offside of WP:BLP.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 23:48, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hillier running under PPC banner 

message: I constantly see in the history that right wing is added and removed from the first sentence. I think it should be kept off because of Wikipedia's POV rules regarding neutrality. It's also inconsistent with most other politicians wikipedia pages.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SailingOn (talk • contribs) 23:50, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuous Back and Forth regarding Right Wing in the introductory sentence
Talk:Verbandsgemeinde

message: What is the exact English translation of the term "Verbandsgemeinde"? --Criticalthinker 22:43, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I think this type of government is a form of a county with more power than a traditional US county or a Verwaltungsgemeindschaft. You can't say it is a collective municipiality because people could think you mean a super city. A Verbandsgemeinde is not trying to re-organize settlements, rather it carries out various functions of city government, such as resident registrations and summary prosecution of civil infractions (traffic ticket, etc.).
I am thinking about writing an article "counties in European countries" and put links in there to the articles "amt", "Verwaltungsgemeindschaft" and "Verbandgemeinde". I think that would clarify a lot and relate articles of the same complex matter. Chris.usnames (talk) 17:57, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Verbandsgemeinde" translation

message: Who put the districts of Rhineland-Palatinate into this article? Is there any common sense reason for this? They belong into the article districts in Rhineland-Palatinate, not into an article about the Verbandsgemeinde. Also scrap this map and put a new one, which shows the Verbandsgemeinde counties of Rhineland-Palatinate, in. Chris.usnames (talk) 18:03, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed both lists. There is a link to the categories further down the article anyway. Agathoclea (talk) 12:43, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are Districts in this article?
Talk:Gambian epauletted fruit bat

message: The Gambian epauletted fruit bat has recently been repeatedly documented in urban gardens in Niamey, Niger (see iNaturalist.org), suggesting that it's range also includes the western panhandle region of this country -- or at least the Niger River valley. This represents a modest extension of the range indicated in the Wikipedia article on this species, and information to this effect can be incorporated by adding Niger to the list of countries in which this species is indicated to be found.
41.138.38.242 (talk) 08:47, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled