Talk:List of systems of plant taxonomy

message: No time right now, but there is an important series in progress, The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants edited by Kubitzki et al., that should probably be added even though the "system" itself is not yet complete. MrDarwin 20:16, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is until now 7 volumes: Vol. 1 Pteridophytes and Gymnosperms (1990), Vol. 2: Angiosperms: Magnoliid, Hamamelid and Caryophyllid Families (1993), Vol.3:Lilianae except Orchidaceae (1998),Vol. 4:Alismatanae to Commelinanae (except Gramineae)(1998), Vol.5: Capparales, Malvales and Non - betalain Caryophyllales, (2002) Vol. 6: Celastrales, Oxalidales, Rosales, Cornales, Ericales (2004) and Vol.7: Lamiales (except Acanthaceae including Avicenniaceae)(2004). Berton 12:27, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Finally, something Berton and I can agree on! Unlike the APG classifications (which are basically just lists of names of families and higher taxa, leaving us to guess at where particular genera go), the Kubitzki volumes provide precise definitions, descriptions, and circumscriptions of orders, families and genera; moreoever, most treatments are written by specialists in those groups. MrDarwin 17:44, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent, well writing! Berton 17:52, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Kubitzki system"?

message: "A system must be taxonomic, that is deal with a large number of plants, by their botanical names. Secondly it must be a system, i.e. deal with the relationships of plants."  I think that the Raunkiær system fails both--isn't it one of the systems actually given as an example of a non-taxonomic system of plant categorization?  KP Botany 00:32, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My apologies: you're quite right.  I'll be more careful next time. Clicketyclack 09:50, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raunkiær system 

message: Why are the three versions so far produced by the APG treated as three different systems in this list? Both the APG II and the APG III papers make clear that they are intended as revisions/improvements on the first APG system. There are more changes over time in, e.g., Thorne's "system", than in the 3 APG systems. I would like to move all three APG versions under one heading, but hesitate to start a long argument. Peter coxhead (talk) 22:23, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As no-one has dissented, I have grouped the 3 APG systems. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:54, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  APG systems 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on List of systems of plant taxonomy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.sil.si.edu/smithsoniancontributions/Botany/pdf/sctb-0058.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.sil.si.edu/smithsoniancontributions/Botany/pdf/scb-0071.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130702041527/http://www.biologie.uni-hamburg.de/b-online/systems/reve1.html to http://www.biologie.uni-hamburg.de/b-online/systems/reve1.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161225080234/http://www.sinauer.com/plant-systematics-a-phylogenetic-approach-817.html to http://www.sinauer.com/plant-systematics-a-phylogenetic-approach-817.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131007100503/http://www.insecta.bio.spbu.ru/z/nom/~Rafinesque1815.htm to http://www.insecta.bio.spbu.ru/z/nom/~Rafinesque1815.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:59, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified