Talk:Cairo Conference

message: The various "Alternative Meanings" should be at the TOP of the page, as a disambiguation option, not waaaaaay at the bottom. I'm looking at my kid's homework and thinking he's crazy. Someone, please, disambiguate this page. I'm not capable. Nirigihimu 14:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Link was added 21:32, 26 Oct 2004 by User:Choster
See:
* Cairo Conference (disambiguation)
* List of conferences in Cairo
Pdfpdf (talk) 12:39, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Cairo Conferences... 

message: This statement was removed:
:However, in 1955 after the World War II, being asked the question whether Formosa should be handed to the Communist China according to the Cairo Declaration, Churchill told the House of Commons, "The Cairo Declaration contained merely a statement of common purpose." And since it was made "A lot of things have happened" he added. His Foreign Secretary, Anthony Eden, also said that the Declaration was merely a statement of intention that Formosa should be retroceded to China after the war, that never materialized.
I removed it because it is out of context and needs to be tied in with the overall political status of Taiwan. Britain, unlike the US, had at the time already switched recognition to the PRC, but it was a member of the western block and was interested in stopping the spread of communism. Therefore, "China" here likely means "the People's Republic of China" and not the Republic of China. The fact that sovereignty over these islands were ultimately given to the ROC is not presented and the British did not express oppositon to this act in the interests of containment. --Jiang 02:57, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: But I do think the political status of Taiwan needs some coverage here, but we should jump to a particular detail without first mentioning the general situation. --Jiang 03:08, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)

text: * The Declaration was actually signed on 27 November 1943. They were not there because the issuing of declaration was delayed by an order of the allies. The declearation was released in Communique on 1 December 1943. Please see the external link for more information. [] Enlarge the picture, which is a telegram to inform the radio operators to broadcast the declaration. There is a strict time and date that for that. Well... I guess there were either censorships or some strategic considerations at war time.
Xplorer 23:17, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Ryukyu Kingdom was a tributary state of Ming & Qing China, but never a controlled/occupied territory. Therefore, to whatever extent you want to claim that it was "stolen", it was not stolen from China. Secondly, the Ryukyus were invaded by the forces of Satsuma domain in 1609, and formally annexed in the 1870s. So none of the major Ryukyu islands were "occupied territories" as a result of WWII. LordAmeth 12:02, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taiwan 

message: The closest thing that actually existed was a "PRESS COMMUNIQUE"-- and it's not signed, because none of the three participants where present. In other words, the press communique was entirely made up.
This non-existant “Cairo Declaration” resulted in the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of Taiwanese on 2/28/1947 (see 228 Incident). Thanks to this "declaration" and EXTENSIVE bullying on PRC's part, Taiwan's international recognition has never been realized. What's worse, Taiwan is now only three votes away from being officially voted off as "part of PRC" in the UN!
What is the truth: See http://www.taiwannation.com.tw/ecairo.htm
Again, mister, your statement was misleading; due to KMT’s corrupt rule in Taiwan, the 228 incident was suppressed by KMT/ROC, although CCP did arm local forces to revolt KMT's rule in Taiwan. By the time 228 incident happened PRC had not even established.--Jerrychen0067 06:53, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Due to recent events, the UN should verify that the so-called "Cairo Declaration" IS A FAKE before it's too late. 

message: I got links from the Japanese National Library stating the document is signed. http://www.ndl.go.jp/constitution/e/etc/c03.html &
http://www.ndl.go.jp/constitution/e/shiryo/01/002_46shoshi.html
The Cairo Communiqué was a press release forward to all the radio operators to annouce the actual declaration resulting from the conference through air. At the time, it was in a form of a telegram. It is like our email today. Can one physically sign an email?  Therefore it is real no point to state that the Communiqué is unsigned, which the Declaration itself was signed. The external link to the Japanese National Library clearly states the was signed. Please take a look.
For people who has question on if the Cairo Declaration is valid.  I think the following will mean something. Japanese Instrument of Surrender, which is surely signed, clearly states the acceptance of the Potsdam Declaration which referred to this Cairo Declaration. So even if it was unsigned, it was accepted by all the countries signed on the Japanese Instrument of Surrender. 
Please control your emotions. We only discuss facts and it is not a place merely to express your opinion. Please note that your personal website does not have any accreditation to serve as an evidence.     
--Xplore
:Above links to Japanese National Library do not suggest there's a Cairo Declaration aside from the Cairo Communiqué that we know. The source also does not indicate the Communiqué or the Declaration (if exist) was signed. Just want to share the observation. >g2g886 (talk) 18:51, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Communiqué could not be signed but the Declaration was signed and formally accepted. Please stop saying the Declaration was unsigned

message: Can someone please tell me where did they fine the codename? Kind of interesting
Xplorer 04:08, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: codenamed "SEXTANT"

message: since some years - every year there is a big meeting of the global anti-war movement in cairo which is called cairo conference. this is why i found this article - eventually it would be good to make a second page?
See:
* Cairo Conference (disambiguation)
* List of conferences in Cairo
Pdfpdf (talk) 12:39, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  new cairo conference! 

message: Hello! I read there "The Cairo Declaration was signed on 27 November 1943" but in Cairo Declaration there is "Cairo Declaration is unsigned.". Which one is right?--OsamaK 20:28, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signed or unsigned? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Simmygreen (talk) 18:22, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: North African History, AFH 4302

message: After the announcement of the Cairo Declaration, Emperor Showa convened the Imperial Council, at which moderate forces rose, and in October 1944, former Prime Minister Konoe Fumimaro's brother Konoe Tadamaro secretly negotiated peace with Chiang Kai-shek's side based on the Cairo Declaration through the Eryusha [10]: 2600:1700:E540:6120:18DE:671D:C560:63AC (talk) 20:46, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No sources availble for purchase or viewing in US to confirm this