lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Churchill Theatre

message: I came to this article hoping for more information about the origins and planning of the Churchill Theatre, e.g. the fact that it replaced Bromley's previous theatre, the New Theatre, which was destroyed by fire in 1971. It could also be made clearer that the council took the opportunity to replace the old public library at the same time, by building a joint library/theatre complex. Lonegroover (talk) 16:29, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: More history needed?
Talk:Passion (emotion)

message: are you suggesting this redirect to the wiktionary? I don't think it should be deleted because it lacks content, that's what the stub tag is for. Why not try to improve it instead? abexy 04:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Deletion

message: Emotional connection is structure in a modern world. Feeling and enthusiasm subtract each other in a value based system. There is almighty acknowledgment of emotion. Emotional systems recover from lust when a test is impossd on their parties. There's a confrontation which occurs when passion and lust are isolated in an relationship context. 41.114.188.155 (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passion vs Lust
Talk:Georg Luger

message: In 1869 Ludwig Loewe began producing sewing machines and three years later started producing rifles for the German Army. When he died in 1886, his brother Isadore took over. In 1891 Georg Luger began working for the Ludwig Loewe Company. About the same time Hugo Borchardt developed a semiautomatic pistol (C-93) and went to Ludwig Loewe and Co. to manufacture in 1893. The following year, Georg Luger demonstrated this pistol to the US Army who rejected it, but the complaints from the Army became a checklist for his redesign which started in 1894 and resulted in prototypes starting in 1895 (https://www.germandaggers.com/Gallery/GL1.php). Originally referred to as Borchardt-Luger, production beginning in 1900 are referred to as Luger (though they were likely known as Pistole Parabellum for the early production years). The Gewehr 1888 rifle was produced by several companies including Loewe and was experiencing serious problems. In 1892 a leading anti-Semite, Hermann Ahlwardt, started blaming the Ludwig Loewe Company for defective rifles. None of the claims were proven, but the company's name was ruined. So in 1896, Ludwig Loewe Co was merged with other Loewe controlled arms and ammunition companies to become Deutsche Waffen- und Munitionsfabriken (DWM).
While you will find Wikipedia articles to validate each of these references, the 1886 death of Ludwig Loewe and 1896 change from Ludwig Loewe Co to DWM seems to have been overlooked in several articles. For example, in 1894 when Luger demonstrated the Borchardt C-93 to the US Army, it was NOT made by DWM because DWM didn't exist until 1896. Ludwig died in 1886 so the company name wasn't changed 10 years later due to Ludwig's death. Clinocio (talk) 18:48, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ludwig Loewe Co. vs. DWM
Talk:Crystal Palace Dinosaurs

message: thumb|Miniature Megalosaurus 
It seems some miniature versions of the sculptures were made at about the same time for educational purposes and spread around the world, as told in this blog post: Perhaps worth a mention, ? Sources can be found at the end of the blog post. We also seem to have a Commons photo of one of the small models. FunkMonk (talk) 16:20, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Go for it. By the way, talking of Megalosaurus, that article really should include the Dickens quote about M. waddling down the high street, it's highly relevant, and goes some way to explaining the odd shape of M. in this article too. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:20, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, , I just got this book, which is the most definitive account of the statues so far (hence my latest edit), and since this year is the 200th anniversary of the coinage of the name Dinosauria, there are various events planned, and I was thinking it would be fitting to get this article to FAC by adding missing stuff from the new book, due to the close association with the history of early dinosaur science. What do you think? As for the name "Geological Court", that is what it was referred to originally, and is so in the history section of the new book. FunkMonk (talk) 12:12, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  Then use the citation to put the name in the main text, and then mention it in the lead. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:33, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: A citation won't be needed in the intro once the article is expanded accordingly with the new source and the names mentioned in the article body with citations. It was simply a preliminary edit to prepare for a larger overhaul, so what do you think about the rest of what i wrote? FunkMonk (talk) 14:01, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, no worries. On the anniversary, yes, we could go for FAC. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:25, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool, now added and consolidated some of the citations to the new book and added Owen's original guide book. I can quite recommend the new book, by the way, it is written much more from a palaeontologist's/artist's perspective, so unlike earlier accounts, it appreciates the sculptures for how accurate they were for the time, rather than the rather moot point that they're inaccurate today.  also has the book and would like to help with expansion. FunkMonk (talk) 00:41, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miniature replicas
Talk:Parker Hale PDW

message: I propose that Bushman IDW be merged into Parker Hale PDW. 
The Bushman IDW is unreferenced and has no sources apart of 2 links to US patents.
DrunkSquirrel (talk) 01:40, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: For. Very similar, if not mostly the same design. Usually, merging into the article of whichever came first would appear prudent (this case, it seems to be the Bushman), but the forerunner in question didn't seem to have left the blueprint/patent phase, and there unfortunately seems to be nearly nothing else sourcing its existence, so fusing with the materialized Parker Hale is agreeable. 2601:5:C480:88E0:DAA2:5EFF:FE96:5BB8 (talk) 03:11, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Dennis Severs' House

message: This interesting blog entry here is by Dennis Severs' niece, and has photos of the house taken in the mid 1990's.  There are other entries in her blog that are tagged 18 Folgate Street that have information about the house and its inhabitants, Dennis Severs and Simon Pettet, as well as lots of photographs.  I don't know whether it would be allowed in the article, but it is worth noting here at least. 86.133.53.110 (talk) 18:39, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible reference 

message: The problem with  Marie Celeste and Mary Celeste is complicated. Many sources don't understand the difference, including, it would seem, this one. Since the passage works perfectly well without it, and it's a bit of OR,  I've removed it. Hengistmate (talk) 22:01, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mary/Marie Celeste.
Talk:Devonshire House

message: I added an infobox to the article, let me know if there are any issues Edward Jocob Philip Smith (talk) 10:44, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, it needs discussion. And to add the same image as we already have, so that the same image appears twice, is just sloppy editing. KJP1 (talk) 08:03, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: bro chill i started an discussion and no one answered it so i added it just so that people can access its basic information Edward Jocob Philip Smith (talk) 18:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:Donmar Warehouse

message: The history section doesn't ring true to me, I remember Donmar as a theatre lighting and equipment supplier and their warehouse being full of stock. I would regularly go there in the late eighties to get stuff like lighting gels and accessories as well as actual lanterns and other larger scale equipment.
Can anyone with personal knowledge fill in this period of Donmar's history? As a mere customer without background knowledge I feel unqualified.
82.45.220.108 (talk) 01:37, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Warsaw Concerto

message: To the poor student who's being forced to play the Warsaw Concerto and doesn't think he/she should have to and shared said sentiments at the bottom of the article (before I removed said sentiments): I feel your pain. Just get off Wikipedia, focus on the music for an hour a day, you'll have it in no time. I promise. It works for me. Kingnavland 04:52, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Waxing condescending

message: I was under the impression that "The World Outside" was based on the Warsaw Concerto, not the other way around. Which came first?
Rconroy 19:17, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The world outside - which came first 

message: I'm just listening to said Warsaw concerto for the first time and have to say, I concur with Spike Milligan. Maikel 03:47, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spike
Talk:Duke of York's Theatre

message: On 27 July 2018, Amanpour on PBS had an interview with Ian McKellen at the theatre.  A number of interiors were shown, including the Duke of York room & the bar.  The bar was where Equity (British trade union) was legally started.  Adding these to the article would improve it. https://www.pbs.org/video/amanpour-ian-mckellen-dqyywo/ — Lentower (talk) 19:59, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interiors & history of this theatre 
Talk:Patently unreasonable

message: How can this article have existed since 2003 and still have a blank talk page? That must be some kind of record -- which of course I am wrecking with this edit. Anyhoo, the article describes the three standards of review as "correctness, unreasonableness, and patent unreasonableness". The problem is that the first of these specifies the level the decision under review must meet in order for the reviewing court to let the decision stand, while the other two specify the standard necessary for the court to overturn the decision. Phrasing the standards in this way makes a somewhat confusing subject even more confusing. We could get rid of this problem by calling the three standards "incorrectness, unreasonableness, and patent unreasonableness" but I've never seen the first standard referred to as "incorrectness". If it were up to me, I would describe all three standards adjectivally: "correct; reasonable; not patently unreasonable". --Mathew5000 04:55, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've noticed that inconsistency as well. You can definitely blame the SCC for that. Though it is confusing, it's a very well entrenched standard phrasing, both in cases and in textbooks. I do not mind your proposal, but I would expect that sooner or later that a stickler may take issue with it. --PullUpYourSocks 17:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I be the stickler. It is undoubtedly an internal inconsistency, but the usage by courts entirely adheres to the inconsistency. If we want to be legally correct (which is, I would think, the only kind of correct when discussing the name of a legal standard), we should use "correctness". For now, I'm making the change, since I don't know when this will be looked at again, but I won't take offense at a reversion if someone disagrees. Also, whatever the final outcome, consistency should be maintained with Standard_of_review and Canadian_administrative_law --Rumplefurskin 20:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: need parallel linguistic construction to describe the standards of review?
Talk:Eastbury Manor House

message: Have inserted a section regarding the legend of the gunpowder plot being conceived at Eastbury.  Once I have researched, I will expand it
Danny (talk) 16:46, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Gunpowder Plot

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 13:52, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Talk:Ely Place

message: I found the following section in the Metropolis Management Act 1855
Special Provision as to Powers of Commissioners acting under 5 & 6 Vict. c. xlviii. as to paving Ely Place, &c.
CCXXXVII. 
This Act shall not divest the Commissioners under an Act of the Session holden in the Fifth and Sixth Years of Her Majesty, Chapter Forty-eight (Local), ‘For paving, lighting, watching, cleansing, and improving Ely Place and Ely Mews, Holborn , in the County of Middlesex ,’ of any of the Powers or Property vested in them under that Act, nor shall any of the Provisions of this Act in relation to the paving, lighting, watering, and cleansing of Streets apply to the Parts within the Limits of the said Local Act, nor shall such Parts be assessed or rated under this Act for defraying any Expenses incurred by the District Board for the Holborn District in relation to paving, lighting, watering, and cleansing; but such Parts shall be subject to all the Provisions of this Act relating to Sewerage and House Drainage, and to be assessed or rated for Sewerage Expenses incurred by the said District Board, and for Expenses incurred by the Metropolitan Board of Works, and towards any Sums required to be raised by such Board under this Act, in like Manner as other Parts within the said District. 
And this section in the Public Health (London) Act, 1936 
75. The provisions of the Metropolis Management Act, 1855 , and of the Metropolis Management Amendment Act, 1862 , specified in Part I of the Second Schedule to this Act, shall, as amended by this Act or by any subsequent enactment, apply for the purposes of this Part of this Act as they apply for the purposes of those Acts: 
Provided that nothing in this section shall exempt from the operation of the provisions of this Part of this Act relating to sewerage and house drainage...
(b) the parts of the borough of Holborn to which a local Act of the fifth and sixth years of Her late Majesty Queen Victoria, chapter forty-eight, for paving, lighting, watching, cleansing and improving Ely Place and Ely Mews, Holborn, in the County of Middlesex, extends.
I have located the Act referred to (but not the text):
5 & 6 Vict. c.xlviii: An Act for paving, lighting, watching, cleansing, and improving Ely Place and ely mews, Holborn, in the county of Middlesex. Received the royal assent on June 18, 1842.
Lozleader (talk) 13:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commissioners
Talk:Marie Dean Arrington

message: If she's dead, how can she be still be incarcerated. That's gross.Marklemagne (talk) 17:06, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone edit this page 
Talk:Finborough Theatre

message: This page has improved substantially, however, two things. Please ensure that the material is referenced to reliable sources (e.g. theatre archive for performance, but - say - newspaper reviews for quality and significance. Also, please restrain the language - I suspect the content is either being copied from PR releases, or being added to by the PR dept.!
The article needs to be encyclopaedic, ultimately peacock words and pure publicity will be deleted. (Also material just 'copied' from elsewhere). Thank you. Kbthompson 10:40, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone of article

message: Did my best to correct the 'bare url' issues. Please feel free to check, double-check, triple-check and, of course, correct. Cheers! Thouny (talk) 05:22, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Link rot
Talk:Yıldız Kenter

message: Professor Kenter's mother was English and She is native English speaker.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.210.117.30 (talk) 22:07, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  English Ancestory 
Talk:Frognal House

message: Today's New York Post indicates a house with this name is for sale. The story says De Gaulle lived here. The photos there do not match the photos here. I suspect they are wrong. Still, here is the link:
https://nypost.com/2021/09/03/london-home-where-charles-de-gaulle-fled-nazi-occupied-france-lists-for-20-8m/
* It's a different place. Charles de Gaulle lived at 99 Frognal, Hampstead, aka. Frognal House. But not this one! :) Jdcooper (talk) 22:52, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Charles De Gaulle
Talk:Alkhan-Kala operation

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support. feydey 10:51, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survey 
Talk:Cocktail bun

message: I'm proposing to merge gai mei baau into this article since they are the same thing.  If there are no objections, I will do so.  —Umofomia 05:23, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree.  Please do merge.  Take the categories and put it in Chinese pastry.  I think that is why I didn't find it before.  It doesn't hurt if you have both pics so the one I upload doesn't get orphaned.    Thanks. Benjwong 14:11, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge ''gai mei baau'' 

message: "gai mai" literally means "chicken tail" or cocktail.
is "gai mai" Cantonese for cocktail (alcoholic beverage)?  Or is it an idiom meaning "odds and ends", which would fit the description of the invention of the bun?
(Aside: I do quite like the English translation of the name.  It is one of the few foods that has a nice English translation.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.50.113.28 (talk) 02:20, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the name
Talk:Broadway, Bradford

message: There is more info to be found here. The start date seems to change regularly. Secretlondon 05:24, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That link lacks any search terms, so it is not very useful! --ColinFine 20:26, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I know - you need to search for broadway. I couldn't get a link to a saved search (sorry). Secretlondon 23:19, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

text: No, you're right, they've written the script so it will only interpret POST parameters. Nuisance.  --ColinFine 10:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Holland House

message: There isn't much description of the architecture or contents of the House, so there didn't seem to be a place to put the following.  I also don't know if the room still exists; I only have an old drawing of the room and this description.
* The Gilt Chamber at Holland House:  In that room the figures over the fireplace were painted in flesh color wherever bare; the rest was in shaded gold.  The lower marbles of the fireplace were black, and the upper ones were Sienna; the capitals and bases of the columns and pilasters were gilt, and the groundwork from which all the glittering decoration rose was white.
** 
--SEWilco (talk) 03:34, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There you go.  Wish it was more colorful.  -- SEWilco (talk) 05:12, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I've finally gotten around to adding these to the article!  — Scott • talk 12:08, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gilt Chamber

message: Perhaps we should mention that the guy died in this building. --Ghirla-трёп- 17:24, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Thanks!  — Scott • talk 12:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Joseph Addison]] 

message: Lloyd Charles Sanders, The Holland House Circle, 1908 (Google Books copy), seems to be the perfect book for expanding this article from. At the very least it can be referenced extensively, but I'm pretty sure it's out of copyright (death of the author plus 70 years) and can be used directly.  — Scott • talk 12:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for working with 

message: Hello. I appreciate that you've clearly put in a lot of work here recently, but you've completely destroyed the structure of the article for general readers. The table of contents has gone from being simply structured to a hyper-dense morass of names and dates of birth and death. The extra images in a column on the right stretch so far down the side of the article that they cover up the expand/contract controls on the timeline boxes at the end. There was no need to push the Greville quote into a section of its own that is unlikely ever to be expanded; likewise adding sub-section headers such as "Gilt Chamber" for single paragraphs was unnecessary. Again, thanks for all the extra content, but I'm letting you know this out of courtesy before I start making fixes. Your input is welcome.  — Scott • talk 17:49, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent restructuring has made this article look much worse 

message: Any chance of the simplifying the references, notes, and multiple bibliographical lists here? Seems quite difficult to track the footnotes, and also makes it difficult add new material and references. Why should short wikipedia articles references have so much apparatus not found in books and articles?Unoquha (talk) 12:46, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Hope Theatre

message: Hollar's long view is incorrect. The twin gabled structure is the second Globe. The Hope has no stage cover, it's to the northwest on the map.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.138.131.69 (talk) 13:17, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, by swapping the internal captions around. It's a long-standing issue which  should have been dealt with before; sorry for the delay. --Old Moonraker (talk) 08:55, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Hollar's long view
Talk:Hornsey (parish)

message: The dead link is no longer dead. Do we want it back? Pterre (talk) 08:07, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vision of Britain 
Talk:Jewel House

message: Please could someone extend the lead to cover the contents of the article. I have just written a stub article called Resident Governor of the Tower of London and Keeper of the Jewel House but from reading the lead of this article and Master of the Jewel Office one could be lead to believe that this office was still controlling access to the Jewels. -- PBS (talk) 04:29, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead 

message: At the end of the "Present Day" section, someone has added "2020 CORONA"
Does this mean something, or is it just vandalism?
The underground vault built in 1967 is home to 25,000 architectural drawings of historic royal palaces.[11] 2020 CORONA
2A00:23C6:7B80:CB01:95F5:BB71:BE6A:EA2A (talk) 12:29, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Present Day 

message: The HRP website link was broken. I've updated it to the nearest match. Alleleator (talk) 21:22, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:Kingsway International Christian Centre

message: I have reverted an addition from an unregistered user. The text was POV, unsourced, and unencyclopaedic. It was also in the wrong section (references!). If the contributor objects to my actions, I would ask that they register as a wikipedia user so we can easily discuss how to improve this article together. Sidefall 07:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled