lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chinese Democracy Tour

message: Told ya!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!--201.199.71.26 (talk) 14:34, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concert in Costa Rica 

message: Is there any article of them saying that?
If so, it needs to be cited.
"At first the audience refused to welcome us to the jungle, but by the time we took our final bow, it had become paradise city. Although Axl tried to November rain on our parade, no sweet child o' mine can derail the EODM night train. We say live and let die." Ganon391 (talk) 12:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eagle Of Death Metal 

message: I suggest that this page be split into multiple articles. These shows are NOT all a part of the same tour. The page spans seven years of touring with two different bands. I suggest separate articles for at least the 2002 and 2006 tours. Everything else can remain here, with the 2002 and 2006 sections having a "main article" link. Superior1 (talk) 23:30, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not too happy with the current situation either but since WP:GNR is dead just be bold.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord2 23:37, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the article, as you can see, to be Chinese Democracy Tour Series, instead of just Chinese Democracy Tour. This shows that it is a series of tours, rather than one tour, with each tour (2001 EU; 2002, 2006 and 2007 worlds) as legs. I have created the Guns N' Roses European Tour 2001 article, and the rest will follow soon. Thus, it is pretty much being split. Andre666 (talk) 12:22, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Split Proposal

message: why do all the s.america dates keep changing? can someone post all the rumored dates and just state they are all rumored?Rocknroll47 (talk) 19:10, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: South America dates?

message: http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=155545
if it is confirmed, lets remember to add a 2011 section with this date.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.22.89.36 (talk) 15:29, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rock In Rio to be confirmed today? 

message: im trying to update the infobox on the side of the beginning of the article to say that their are so far 3 dates confirmed for 2011 and not just one. But I can't find the editing option. Any help?Rocknroll47 (talk) 14:21, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: wtf?

message: I'm guessing this article probably had one of the worst link-rot problems I've ever attempted to resolve. However, what's holding up the removal of the  tag is a single image reference at #87. If someone can properly label this image, the tag can probably be removed. All other bare urls in this article appear to be covered by  templates, which of course is a different issue altogether.  -- WikHead (talk) 02:27, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link rot
Talk:Misanthrope (band)

message: Their website seems messed up. Anyone know what's up with that ? zubrowka74 15:31, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I did post on your user talk page that it could be down permanently, and that could be what happened, which would be unfortunate. Other than that, I do not know what has happened with the website and how it came into its current state. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 20:23, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Web site
Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Adelaide/Meetup 2

message: Thanks for making this happen Alex. Derek.munneke 01:26, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks

message: Just joking around a bit here and rambling on, But how many people have actually had a Wikipedian Birthday Party? For me it's a big number seeing as I am legally allowed to get my license. Yes, I would be Sixteen (It has a ring to it)I find it a bit crazy that the meeting it the day after my birthday even though it is a 1 in 365 chance of it being on the day of my birthday. bring out the birthday cake. An Apple a day keeps -The Doctor- Away.. Or does it! (talk)(contribs) 14:02, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthday Party?
Talk:Echo boom generation

message: I presume this is a US-specific phenomenon, and that what is described - over 4 million live births per year - refers to the US. Please clarify this.
Varchoel 12:56, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The echo boom also occurred in Canada and some European countries (I will get a source for this). Meanwhile, I've adjusted the wording. Sunray 06:20, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Bias? 

message: I'm having trouble with the math.  Baby boom: 1946- 1964  If we assume a generation is about 22 year, then the "echo" of the boom should have started around 1968-1990, and the oldest echo boomers would be 31 when the first article appeared in 1999.  Most sources seem to refer to a much younger group that sound like they would be the grandkids of the Boomers. Anyone figure this out? ThanksDennisboomer 04:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This certainly isn't scientific, but of the Baby Boomers I know (including my parents), many of them married and had children later rater than sooner. This may (or may not) account for the discrepancy. Amphy 03:29, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Doesn't add up

message: Merge: Since May there has been a merge tag proposing the merger of Echo Boom into this article. There has been no discussion on this, but it makes sense to me to merge the content of the stubby little article on Echo boom, and change it to a redirect to this article. I will do that if no one objects within the next couple of days. Sunray 21:52, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm, same names... Looks like it's just 2 articles for the same generation. I agree, merge. OSbornarf 12:27, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged. Sunray 06:09, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Is there any evidence of the use other than by S&H? If not, it should be deleted. DGG (talk) 08:13, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: or possibly, merge into Generation Y ? DGG (talk) 05:36, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As a whole I think that naming a certain generation is a dumb thing.83.228.89.2 (talk) 20:12, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: sure it is, but yet people do it quite a bit, so the ones they use are notable. People do many dumb things, and WP has a few hundred thousand articles that might well be considered to be about them. DGG (talk) 14:44, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Looking atthe presnt definition, how can a group of people born during a 4 year period, 1988-1992 possibly be called a generation? DGG (talk) 02:15, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: I am prepared to edit this page and turn it into a redirect if no one disagrees. Generally the term "Echo Boomer" is used as a term that businesses use when discussing marketing and recruiting to the generation otherwise known as "Generation Y" here, here, and here are some external references to this usage. Of course, like the page says the dates dont exactly match up, but all the same I think it's clear that this page is unreliable. anyone have any problems with me proceeding with this action? %%-SYKKO-%% (talk to me) 09:10, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:John Russell

message: While we're at it, how about deleting all of the John Russell Taylors, Youngs, Bartletts, etc.  unless there is some authority that they were ever known by the name "John Russell" alone. Matchups 02:10, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur. There would be no reason for people to look here for those names, and it just clutters the page. --MCB 06:14, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle Name Russell 

message: I encountered the name John Russell as the author of several books on art, including a massive one on Matisse.  Doing some basic research, I found he was chief art critic for the New York Times, was born in England in 1919, and received an award from the French government in the 1980's.
I want to add him to the disambiguation page and wonder if he would be considered significant enough for which to construct a short page.JeanEva 03:10, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding John Russell, art critic (NYT)
Talk:List of U.S. Highways in Indiana

message: Can US 31W, US 31E, and US 37 be added to the list? Charlotte Allison (Allen/Morriswa) (talk) 01:15, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: yes, and you can add them yourself. I just built a table out of what was here before, which was a bulleted list of numbers and no other details. Those three highways weren't on the previous list, so that's they weren't added. Imzadi 1979 →  01:40, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions? 
Talk:Oglala

message: How is "Oglala" pronounced? NerwenGreen 01:33, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've heard it pronounced O-gla-la or O-kla-la... oncamera(t) 19:54, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronounced? 

message: Which is preferred,  Oglala Lakota or Oglala Sioux?  The variation is used inconsistently here and elsewhere.  What is the difference?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:46, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Oglala Lakota or Oglala Sioux  

message: It would make the article look way better and be more relevant to today if there were at least a few more images (there is only one now) of Pine Ridge and modern day Pine Ridge and Oglala. People get the wrong idea that Pine Ridge is place from the past and/or everything is bad. Images like this are great:.
If anyone has some and would be willing to either give permission to use them or release them into the public domain that would be great. The article Pine Ridge Indian Reservation could use modern images too. They could be easily uploaded at Wikimedia Commons7mike5000 (talk) 14:31, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Modern Day Pine Ridge and Oglala Images

message: The description of the flag appears inaccurate or perhaps the flag image is wrong. The text indicates or at least implies that this is the current flag. The text describes "The circle of nine teepees on the flag..." but I count only eight teepees on the flag. Additionally the description states "The blue represents the sky..." and I am unable to see any blue in the attached flag image. It's possible that the image and meanings are both correct but further explanation might help.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.33.90.240 (talk) 01:07, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oglala Flag 

message: Aside from a paragraph on the Sioux Alliance in the 1820s and 1830s and an apparently unrelated paragraph on Surrounded by the Enemy, there's nothing there.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.232.62.96 (talk) 14:14, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm shocked that this comment is 10 years old, and the history section is still so small. Also, I came looking for the Oglala peoples' history, which didn't begin when Europeans arrived. Why is there nothing at all about the origins of these people? 2601:1C2:1B7F:1630:D4B7:94F1:E2BF:2575 (talk) 13:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's up with the history section?
Talk:Freddy Heineken

message: Julius Petersen, a friend of the Family Heineken is his real grandfather, Freddy's father was born out an affair Freddy's grandfathers Gerard wife had with Julius Petersen. So his real name should be Freddy Petersen, by life he and his close relatives knew this fact.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.170.245.115 (talk) 12:31, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Real Grandfather
Talk:Wrestling Ernest Hemingway

message: Just for the record, the plot summary here is just awful  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.96.205.14 (talk) 06:09, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: I have not watched this movie for a long time, but I dont remember any reference to Frank being from Ireland. I know Richard Harris was Irish, but in this movie, I believe he was suppressing his accent.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.98.205.206 (talk) 18:03, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irish Seaman?
Talk:Ronald Dominique

message: How can a man who frequented gay bars and raped and killed 23 men be "reportedly" gay?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.149.198.207 (talk) 12:48, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: He is a Horrible man sorry god but hope he goes to hell 2601:19E:4082:D620:5DCB:9957:B292:F3BC (talk) 19:02, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary word 

message: Is it really appropriate to have the list of Louisiana killers appended to this article? The relationship to the subject is tenuous at best. This kind of thing should be done as in the overall list of serial killers or by categories.Tkotc (talk) 17:24, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary section 
Talk:Táin Bó

message: The plural of táin is tana, not táins.  MaryJones 01:44, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ha! You beat me to it.  Hi, Mary :-)  Yes, I found this page today and came here to make this exact point.  This article needs renaming.  If we're going with an Irish name here, it should be correct, not an English/Irish hybrid that is incorrect in both languages.  If there is no objection in the immediate future, I'm going to move this... unfortunately, Tana is a disambig.  Perhaps something linke Tana (cattle raids) or Tana (Irish tales)?  I think I prefer the latter.  Any other suggestions? - Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 01:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Other options Tana (literature) and Tana (Irish literature) - Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 20:03, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I think the best solution is to keep it singular, and call it Táin Bó - which I've done. --Nicknack009 21:19, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's better!  Thanks, Nick, it's looking good now. - Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 05:56, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Nicknack/Patrick--works for me! MaryJones (talk) 04:40, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In modern Irish, táinte.  Marcas.oduinn (talk) 18:16, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I think Táin bó Regamain and Táin bó Regamna on Van Hamel's CODECS are the same, viz,
* Dublin, Trinity College, MS 1318  cols 573–958 ... cols 646–648
* London, British Library, MS Egerton 1782 [1516-1518] ff. 81r–82r
:They're not. Táin Bó Regamna is a story of Cú Chulainn's encounter with the Morrígan. Táin Bó Regamain is a story about Ailill and Medb's attempt to recruit a man called Regamon to join them on the Táin Bó Cúailnge by marrying their seven sons to his seven daughters. You can read translations of both in Volume 2 of A. H. Leahy's Heroic Romances of Ireland. --Nicknack009 (talk) 21:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for that. See also British Library, MS Egerton 1782, with: Táin Bó Regamna, f. 76v-77v; Táin Bó Regamain, f. 81r-82r. Marcas.oduinn (talk) 22:21, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regamon / Regamain / Regamna
Talk:Pendergrass, Georgia

message: I have heard the same rumor about the amount of revenue Pendergrass pulls in from tickets. However, such inflammatory data needs to be cited and supported by credible external evidence. Please include a citation for your facts.
DChapii 01:47, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

message: If you would like to know why I assessed the article the way I have, please use my talk page. Ethan (talk) 23:41, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment
Template talk:!!

message: This message is to inform people monitoring this talk page that there is an "editprotected" request involving this and several other templates at Template talk:! --- cymru.lass (hit me up)⁄(background check) 20:02, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editprotected request involving this template 

message: Wikipedia has not yet added the new relief funds. After the co-founder died of cancer on 2/11/13, they made an 'Official Erik Shirt', sold for 1 ticket, and they made an official memorial by his kids. They donate an amount of money for each 'Erik Shirt' bought. I would like to edit this, as I know a lot of details about this.
JoshDeMay (talk) 22:26, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the template . Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 25 February 2013 

message: 168.11.166.20 (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: it's not clear what changes you want made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. --Ahecht (TALKPAGE) 20:41, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 24 August 2015 

message: {{subst:trim|
{{subst:void|State UNAMBIGUOUSLY your suggested changes. Other editors need to know what to add or remove. Blank edit requests will be dec±ἤΐΐΐῒ
:Disabled bogus edit request. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:50, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 28 November 2016
Talk:Cool Beans World

message: ...this page on 15 March 2007 as a result of tidying the entry for Scarlet Traces. There's curiously little info on Cool Beans World available on the web. Even to establish the month in which CBW closed down I had to solve a puzzle (if you feel like retracing my steps, the clues are in reference number 1 ;) ). The writer Ian Edginton says "Cool Beans shut down production, in somewhat deeply dubious circumstances it later transpired..." Mysterious. So if anyone can supply more detailed information, you'd satisfy my curiosity as well as "helping Wikipedia". Jack Garfield 01:53, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Created
Talk:Statute of Uses

message: The idea that the statute of uses was a means to facilitate the dissolution of the monastries is a very interesting one. No doubt the church had a great interest in ensuring that the device was one which could be enforced, and prior to the Statute of uses it was enforced by the Court of Chancery. However this is the first time I have come across the contention that it was primarly motivated by Henry VIII's desire to dislove the church. I would like to know the source for such a contention
89.100.253.127 01:54, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dissolution of the monasteries

message: The article contains the following: "More importantly, the Statute led to the development of the trust as a replacement."  But under English_trust_law#History it says:
"However, when Henry VIII was gone, the Court of Chancery held that it had no application where land was leased. Moreover, the primacy of equity over the common law was reasserted, supported by King James I in 1615, in the Earl of Oxford’s case.[8] The institution of the use continued, as new sources of revenue from the mercantile exploits in the New World decreased the Crown's reliance on feudal dues. By the early 1700s, the use had formalised into a trust:[9] where land was settled to be held by a trustee, for the benefit of another, the Courts of Chancery recognised the beneficiary as the true owner in equity."
It's not clear from this whether the trust is the use by another name, or if it is a new type of object. Count Truthstein (talk) 20:52, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The latter, in many ways; I'd note that the other article is a poorly-referenced, overly long mass of randomly-placed links and tremendously large paragraphs. Ironholds (talk) 21:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trust as a replacement for use 

message: This article is very nearly incomprehensible.  It badly needs a much clearer explanation of the history and nature of uses as background for the rest of the article.  It seems to assume that the reader has such a background.  Few will.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.21.69.172 (talk) 18:23, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomprehensible
Talk:Slav

message: I changed the redirect back to Slavic peoples.  Prior to doing this, I checked the wikilinks to Slav and every one I checked was intended to link to Slavic peoples.  However, to avoid any possible confusion, I did add a redirect5 template to Slavic peoples.--Kubigula (talk) 01:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Changing redirect
Talk:Meram

message: Great infobox! At this juncture with the article a stub, it seems facetious, but eventually Meram the city, needs to be in a separate article from Meram, the district. Student7 (talk) 13:37, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Forking article
Talk:Self-employment tax

message: Please note that Federal Insurance Contributions Act tax is the main article on the U.S.'s FICA tax. Therefore, it is probably better to add any further expansion on that topic to that article, rather than to this one. — Lumbercutter 01:57, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note that Federal Insurance Contributions Act tax is the main article on FICA

message: I started this article a few days ago, but I now realize that it is awkward to break "Self-employment tax" out of Self-employment, which already has "Taxation" subheads for various countries. So it makes more sense just to redirect. Done. — Lumbercutter 01:38, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Most logical just to make this a redirect; done.
Talk:Lorenzo Ghiberti

message: A copy of the doors is viewable in San Francisco, California, USA.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grace_Cathedral,_San_Francisco#Ghiberti_doors  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:204:C400:F951:3402:B355:5DCB:F72 (talk) 03:58, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casting Made from the Original Florence Baptistery Doors

message: Apparently Lorenzo Ghiberti had a son, Vittorio Ghiberti, but it's not clear if the son is notable. The son may be buried at the Basilica of Santa Croce, Florence. --Marc Kupper|talk 20:15, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vittorio Ghiberti 

message: This is a major disruption to the article.  in fact, it's what you call "highjacking". 
Prior to the Renaissance, a clearly modern optical basis of perspective was given in the period between 1028 and 1038, when the Arab polymath Alhazen (al-Hasan Ibn al-Haytham, d. ca. 1041 CE) in his Book of Optics (Kitab al-manazir; known in Latin as De aspectibus or Perspectiva), explained that light projects conically into the eye, discussing perspective. By the 14th century, Alhazen's Book of Optics was available in Italian translation, entitled Deli Aspecti, and Ghiberti relied heavily upon this work, quoting it "verbatim and at length" while framing his account of art and its aesthetic imperatives in the “Commentario terzo.” Alhazen’s work was thus "central to the development of Ghiberti’s thought about art and visual aesthetics" and "may well have been central to the development of artificial perspective in early Renaissance Italian painting." 
Basically, it doesn't matter how accurate the material may be, or how well referenced it is, if it isn't on the subject of Ghiberti and his work, then it doesn't belong here. 
Yes, Alhazen's work should be referred to as a source, used by Ghiberti.  No, the paragraph ought not be primarily about Alhazen.  
Amandajm (talk) 13:23, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who watches this page?  

message: This article has many biased claims such as calling work "superior" and "exquisite". It also has some questionable sources; source 3 is a lifestyle website promoting Italy and Kahn Academy is referenced as a source. Rubywatts (talk) 01:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language and Source Bias 

message: Clearly, more care is needed formatting. There is a stray reference to Bluffton College at the base of the Reference section, could someone more savvy please remove it? I'm not quite sure how, although I cleaned up the unformatted Bluffton link in the External Links section, in which there is also a dead Khan Academy video link, which has a stray reference displaced to the base of the section. Could someone please either remove this entirely or tidy it up? Rsaum (talk) 10:40, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  References and External Links