lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Talant Dujshebaev

message: I'm really doubtful that Dujshebaev played 133 games and then scored 726 with USSR, Unified Team (7 games and 47 goals) and Russia. In this interview in French, we can read that from 21th March 1995, he can play for Spain two years after his last match with Russia (the 1993 World championship finale indeed was played 20th March 1993). Considering that his first cap with USSR was in 1990 (he didn't play at 1990 World championship but do played at the Goodwill Games in July 1990), it would mean that he played 133 games in less that 3 years, at a time when USSR was collapsing: for me, it's far too much. Whether the number are totally fake, or they include matchs with junior NT, or B team, or universitary team, or military team (he played for CSKA, the army club), etc. Nowadays, in the same previous interview, it is said that he played 81 games with USSR, CIS (meaning Unified Team ?) and Russia, which seems more likely than 133. This Danish article, this spanish blog, the another post on same blog and this fan blog (not very realiable source) also say he played 81 matches for Russia or USSR.
Unless a reliable source is given for the 133/726, I think that the 81 caps should be considered--LeFnake (talk) 09:05, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matchs and goals for URSS and Russia
Talk:Mount Wrightson

message: *http://www.flickr.com/photos/rowleypics/3724617094
*http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2012/04/06/20120406men-recover-history-related-tragic-scout-hike.html
*http://www.dovemountaincivicgroup.org/Hike%20Baldy%20MTN.htm
--evrik (talk) 17:17, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Ruger Blackhawk

message: the ruger vaquero is listed as a variant of the blackhawk,but I would consider the former somewhat completly its own model,and not a fully true "variant" of the latter.can anyone contest this?Keserman (talk) 21:09, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  vaquero 

message: The History section of this article contains entire paragraphs without citations. Multiple claims about the production, public reception, and function of the Ruger Blackhawk are made without sources. EMCstudent56 (talk) 10:43, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing citations in History section
Talk:Thomas Fremantle, 1st Baron Cottesloe

message: Any connection with the wife of IDS?  Seems to be implied in a Daily Mail article at http://www.fmwf.com/health/2010/07/betsy-told-me-it-was-cancer-her-words-took-my-breath-away-iain-duncan-smith-talks-for-the-first-time-about-his-wifes-illness/ .  Should be linked to the Wikipage on 'BetsyGate' at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betsygate if accurate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.70.234.144 (talk) 23:29, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestor of Betsygate - Ian Duncan Smith's wife? 

message: Could someone explain why an eighteen year old non-noble Briton would be made a baron by the Emperor of Austria? john k (talk) 07:44, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it is not correct. His father Admiral Thomas Francis Fremantle was made Baron Fremantle of the Austrian Empire. His son Thomas Francis Fremantle inherited the title when he was eighteen year old and his father died. Since his name is similar to his father's, probably this produced the error. However, he received a royal warrant himself which officially authorized the title in the UK. This royal warrant is still valid. Dr. D.E. Mophon 09:47, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, but please provide a source - the Austrian barony is not mentioned in the DNB article. I also don't think it should be included in his title at the beginning, regardless, since the title (assuming it existed) wasn't used. Before he became Lord Cottesloe, he was called Sir Thomas Fremantle, not Baron Fremantle. john k (talk) 14:54, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why an Austrian baron?
Talk:Sabino Canyon

message: If anyone is a caretaker for this article, it could really use some maps. I would imagine, at least one for general location (placement near Tucson) and another for the canyon/park itself.  AUTiger ʃ talk/work 19:36, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Maps

message: I suggest the statement of 8000-6000 year old beginning plant life be removed. Plants have always invaded newly formed mountains. A whole section, in other words: ==Sabino Canyon flora== should go into this article. .... and I'm changing the importance to High. Sabino Canyon is one of the premier canyons, and hiking canyons of Arizona, especially since it is so close to Tucson, and has good trails.  ..(from the HotSonoran,... desertNearYuma...)-Mmcannis (talk) 20:06, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Plant life in the canyon
Talk:Juan Belmonte

message: The article states that Belmonte published his autobiogaphy, but then goes on to state that it was written by another person. This would, of course, make it a biography, not an autobiography. Can someone clarify which Belmonte's book is?ROG 19 19:56, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Autobiography or Biography

message: The description of his death seems a little ambiguous, if not prudish. Does "engaging one more time in his final passions" refer to the smoking and drinking, or to the women, or all three? Essentially, did he get his end away one last time before he shot himself? Tsuguya (talk) 11:27, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Death

message: "prescribed".  Should be "proscribed" 8.9.91.223 (talk) 04:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  spelling
Talk:Manolete

message: I, for one, think the person article should be put back here, with a link to the movie page. Having a disambigous page here is like having a Disambigous Page at John F. Kennedy saying: For the airport... For the President... etc. --Falcorian (talk) 19:14, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the person article should be put back here with a link to the movie. Oysterguitarist 19:35, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've put in a request for a move. --Falcorian (talk) 23:32, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I fixed everything now. Since there are only 2 items named "Manolete", the Manolete (disambiguation) appears really superluous, but I'll spare it. Duja► 07:19, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Move

message: There is a phrase that I don't understand here: "rather than giving the passes separately." Can that be worded more clearly? 155.213.224.59 (talk) 16:03, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear phrasing 

message: He has the nickname "Manolete" but there is no indication here when, where, how or why he received it. That would be good info, if anyone has it. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 16:03, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nickname 

message: I was very surprised there are no photographs of Manolete in this article. Then again, I couldn't find a copyright-free photo online, though I'll admit my search skills are limited. 
Surely someone has a photo they can upload, of someone who must have had millions of photos taken during his lifetime. Thank you Evx (talk) 19:56, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs a photo of Manolete
Talk:Type 54 pistol

message: Removed 
*
Because the reference (https://sites.google.com/site/worldinventory/wiw_as_bangladesh) is not WP:RELIABLE and/or may be WP:SELFPUB. A random blog that isn't well-known and that doesn't post its sources is not reliable. — Safety Cap (talk) 19:45, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bangladesh
Talk:Felidae (film)

message: Rewrote the entire page.
Can't find a list of the English voice cast anywhere. How annoying.
Zekiw (talk) 00:15, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Header

message: This article does not meet the project's B-Class criteria at this time. The main issue is a lack of content; "Release and Reception" is quite short and does not cover reception; "Production" is just two sentences; "Differences from the Novel" is unsourced and looks like original research. Beyond that its just plot, cast and characters. The article will need more to advance from Start-Class. PC78 (talk) 19:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment for [[WP:FILM]] 

message: I just tagged the claim that the role of Deep Purple was played by Michael Habeck. My rationale is as follows: Deep Purple appears dead throughout the entire film. The claim is incredible. I mean this isn't Carl French's latest film we're talking about. -Thibbs (talk) 01:08, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 

message: The article says nothing about critical reception or how it did at the box office. Why?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theworldisbig (talk • contribs) 14:37, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Success 

message: Someone keeps using IMDB and Wikia as reliable sources when they're not at all. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 08:55, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMDB and Wikia 

message: I have no idea if anyone did, but should we include the link to the English Dub on YouTube? It might be useful for people to use who don’t wish to look it up themselves. And I don’t see much of a point of saying it’s on YouTube and not including a link. Many other Wiki-Pages on Wikipedia that talk about videos and movies and such include a link to the video they are talking about. Šüīçįdåł Śøñgbìrd (talk) 00:45, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  English Dub on YouTube
Talk:Galesi-Brescia

message: I could find no information on this company. This article needs to be either deleted or merged into Handgun but there needs to be at least some reference available. Otr500 (talk) 12:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:Four Peaks

message: I modified the statement, "During most winters, Four Peaks offers much of the Phoenix metro area a view of snow covered peaks," and rephrased it to read, "On rare occasions".  I live in Phoenix, and I've only rarely seen snow on Four Peaks. Magnetic Rag (talk) 01:05, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I also live in Phoenix, and I see snow on Four Peaks 2-3 times per year.  I don't recall ever going a whole winter without seeing any snow on Four Peaks.  Even in the winter of 05/06, when we had a five month drought, Four Peaks still managed to obtain a blanket of snow in March.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.47.205.126 (talk) 16:35, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Snow on Four Peaks 

message: As a new user, is it okay to add a section for the four peaks wilderness? I found a few good articles and sites I could use to improve this one. Any help is much appreciated. Squanto1998 (talk) 03:34, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The sites I found are Four Peaks Wilderness Area and The Lone Fire as well as Four Peaks Wilderness Squanto1998 (talk) 17:34, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Four Peaks Wilderness 

message: Traditionally called “Wiigidjessa” by Yavapais, translates to “chopped up mountain”. The name u have “We:khoba” is a literal translation of four peaks. 70.166.192.1 (talk) 13:36, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Four peaks name
Talk:Colt Buntline

message: The item linked at the foot of this very article exposes the Buntline Special as a myth. I have altered the text accordingly.
Agemegos (talk) 05:57, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is a myth 

message: I'm not sure that image is of a Colt Buntline with a 16 inch barrel. Looks a lot closer to around 12 inches. 71.94.167.106 (talk) 07:42, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image barrel length.
Talk:Colt Cobra

message: Bonjour. J'ai lu cet article un peu en diagonale. Je ne sais pas d'où il sort, mais j'ai une certitude, globalement c'est du charabia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scoperh3 (talk • contribs) 17:23, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

message: According to the Colt.com serial number search site, s/n 17474LW belongs to a Colt Agent manufactured in 1952. The wiki page states a first year of manufacture for the Agent to be 1955. It should read 1951 as the first year of the Agent. 2600:1700:4E40:2D80:6C17:C415:1775:F44D (talk) 02:31, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable date of manufacture for Colt Agent
Talk:Waka-jumping

message: As this article needs to be a worldwide view I think the line "As the actions of the Progressive Party in 2002 showed, parties can still find ways around such law." needs expanding Brian | (Talk) 07:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, the information about Donna Awatere Huatas removal from Parliament needs to be added, as it was effected by the Electoral Integrity Act - which shows that MPs can't always get around it. --Lholden 07:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Added information on Donna Awatere Huatas removal and legal challenges to the Act.--wikicharlie23 09:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand

message: Is it fair to list Peter Dunne as waka-jumper for going from Future NZ to United to United Future? It wasn't really a case of him leaving one party and joining another, but rather that in each case the party merged with another. His move from Labour to Future NZ seems like a classic waka-jump, though. Thoughts? Robyn2000 (talk) 03:22, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Schwede66 07:00, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Have removed the United to United Future part as that was just a party rename, however I think leaving his Future NZ party to then join United instead qualifies as a waka-jump. Kiwichris (talk) 08:30, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Dunne 

message: The article says: 'The term waka-jumping is a variant on the phrase "jumping ship".' without citation. This doesn't seem right. Jumping ship means abandoning ship and swimming to land, whereas waka jumping is jumping from one waka to another. Wiktionary in the linguistics sense defines "variant" as: "One of a set of words or other linguistic forms that conveys the same meaning or serves the same function." As waka-jumping does not serve the same meaning or function as jumping ship, and is not close to the same meaning, we shouldn't call it a variant. I propose deleting it. If there were a wikipedia page on jumping ship we could say "This differs from the concept of 'jumping ship', involving a return to land." and link to that, but there isn't. Any other ideas?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schnackal (talk • contribs) 09:18, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it perhaps related to waka hurdling? Jumping waka canoes over wooden hurdles for sport? See Draft:Waka hurdling. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:38, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: For discussion and references, please see Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Humanities/2020 June 19#Party switching and crossing the floor and Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Humanities/2020 June 22#NZ parliamentary bills (particularly my comments here: ). Mathew5000 (talk) 03:58, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legislation passed in 2018 but article says it is still in committee
Talk:SD Teucro

message: The link to your website is incorrect, it's .es, not .com (teucro.es).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.47.74.208 (talk) 21:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect web link
Talk:Penny Mordaunt

message: This is mentioned in relation to the coronation, but when was she appointed to the PC? Seems like an important point in her career and should be mentioned here. 2A00:23C5:E99B:C101:28B2:9A17:728F:BB96 (talk) 08:43, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Privy council]] 

message: As above, the coronation is mentioned but we could use an article on the British swords of state, not just the general topic. There's the one held by Mordaunt in the coronation, then the new one made for Scotland. 2A00:23C5:E99B:C101:28B2:9A17:728F:BB96 (talk) 08:46, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Sword of state]]
Talk:Smith & Wesson Model 17

message: This page is inappropriately named.  It is called Smith and Wesson 17 but is actually about the Smith & Wesson K Frame series of handguns. I am proposing the name be changed to Smith and Wesson K Frame Handguns. Digitallymade (talk) 13:23, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name 

message: I removed the "Problems in Use" section which was unsourced. Preserving here. –dlthewave ☎ 23:13, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced content 
Talk:Schofield Model 3

message: MODEL3SW ... this model Smith & Wesson is unique enough to warrant its own page.   Salvatore R. Raimondi, Sr., contributing editor on Antique & Collectible Smith & Wesson firearms, to Steve Fjestadt's Blue Book of Gun values.    —Preceding unsigned comment added by Model3SW (talk • contribs) 01:17, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

message: As per WP:GUNS#Variants, variants of firearms should be merged into the parent firearm's article. In this case, the Schofield was a variant of the Smith & Wesson No. 3 Revolver and this article should really be merged into that one, with an overall expansion for both. Thoughts? --Commander Zulu (talk) 11:56, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Ruger GP100

message: +P provides a nice run down, in the Standards section, of the meaning of the +P and +P+ designators.  I'd accept your statement that SAAMI may not set a standard for +P+, but it does exist, and ammunition labeled "+P+" is sold commercially. - Thaimoss 23:44, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: U238, that's an excellent point.  I checked out the GP-100 Instruction Manual at <BR>http://www.ruger-firearms.com/Firearms/FAProdSpecsView?model=1705 off the Sturm, Ruger & Co, web page <BR>http://www.ruger-firearms.com/Firearms/FAProdView?model=1705&return=Y.  
<BR>Interestingly, here is what they say on the ammunition (page 11)
RUGER® GP100® revolvers will chamber the .357 Magnum, .38 Special +P,
.38 Special +P+, and the .38 Special cartridge. Ruger revolvers are designed for
use with cartridges of the correct caliber which are manufactured in accordance
with the U.S. Industry Standards. Be certain to use proper cartridges of the
correct caliber. See “Care and Cleaning,” p. 20, for important information on
chamber cleaning.
While the +P+ is explicity noted as supported, your comment about SAAMI not defining it, makes me wonder at the second sentence and its reference to "industry standards".  Is there another recognized standards body that Ruger would be refering to here? - Thaimoss 23:49, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  +P+ 

message: For the use of "Hogue" the rules for names and brands in Wikipedia must be observed. 
It should be marked, that "Hogue" is not a plastic or rubber material but a trademark or brand for gun grips and other individually shaped grips of plenty different materials and designs for different devices and aesthetical or functional goals. That company offers plenty of different stile grips for the GP100 - and other guns. So Sturm&Ruger obtains the grips from an external supplier and manufacturer and seems not to be in control about their production or designs, an important additional information which should be mentioned in the article, too. I have not found out, if this is a collaboration, a kind of joint venture, an excluded or licenced production on demand or just a budget decision for the cheapest standard grips from the mass production. Maybe Hogue cedes their low budget black rubber grips to Sturm&Ruger for a very low price or for free, just to make them the accessories supplier of the first choice for the customers who desire a conveniant grip. I havn't found out...--46.114.136.38 (talk) 12:45, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hogue grips
Talk:John Pollexfen Bastard

message: Hi, you removed People from Devon and People from Truro. You obviously know more than I do but can't he keep the from Devon cat? Glad you removed the dodgy ref. Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 08:45, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Everyone who was MP for Devon is associated with Devon, so the cat is unneeded. ミラP 16:20, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  People from . . .
Talk:Smith & Wesson Model 3

message: I have to say I personally think that the Schofield Model 3 article should be merged into this one, rather than the other way around- Schofield did not actually make revolvers, AFAIK, so maybe an article entitled Smith & Wesson No. 3 Schofield Revolver (or something similar) may be in order?--Commander Zulu (talk) 13:49, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say it should be merged into here. It does seem to be a variant of the Smith & Wesson, and WP:GUNS#Variants specifies that the variant should be merged into the parent's article. I suppose one thing we should also do is expand this article greatly.--LWF (talk) 15:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've merged the articles; There's been a "Merge Notice" up since April- I think that's enough notice. ;) Commander Zulu (talk) 07:27, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I would suggest that the article to which this is talk page be moved from "smith & wesson no. 3 revolver" to "smith and wesson model 3".If i may point out,this article clearly states within that it is a revolver,and purely as an example i state that the  smith and wesson model 19 or smith and wesson model 36 do not have "revolver" included in the titles of their wikipedia pages.Or most revolvers,really.Anyone with more than none to very,very basic or in some cases partial knowlege of firearms actions will recognize it from the picture(s) as a revolver,and those who have very little to no knowlege can figure it out from within the article,and links to the page "revolver".As a person very knowlegeable of many firearms including this one,i say that i don't know of a non-revolver firearm by this name.And as far as i know,the more proper designation would be "smith and wesson model 3",not "smith and wesson no. 3".Though the "no. 3" works understandably,i think it less proper and official.thank you,and i respect any dispute,so dispute me as you see fit with an objection as a new section.i may do it myself,but i think i may wait a few days to see if i have been disputed.but i may not.thank you again,Keserman (talk) 16:55, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  should be moved? 

message: Try a little proofreading.  According to the specifications section, this pistol is 10 feet long.  It should probably be millimeters rather than centimeters, with the correspoinding recalculation of length in inches.24.61.30.217 (talk) 18:09, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hog long? 

message: *The "Ona" Revolver from "Obea Hermanos"
*Trocaola, Aranzabal y Cia. Catalog
*Gangarosa, Gene A., Jr.  "Second-string Handguns from World War I."  Surplus Firearms VI, 1997, pp. 18-22.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.32.64.107 (talk) 11:09, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  For further reading 

message: In the page for the 'Gunfight at the OK corral' it is stated that Wyatt Earp used one of these pistols in the famous fight. Should this not be mentioned in the article? It seems more significant than some video games which are mentioned.Dean1954 (talk) 20:53, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  OK Corral