Talk:Volvo Cars

message: I know for a fact that there is a VCC operated assembly plant in Luqiao, China. I believe it opened during 2016, but I am not sure. Also something should be mentioned about the new plant being built in South Carolina, Volvo's first ever on American soil: http://www.volvocars.com/us/about/our-company/south-carolina-factory  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.24.213.186 (talk) 23:22, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This reply may be too late, but I created the List of Volvo Car production plants page a few days back. Coincidentally, I stumbled upon your Talk page entry today... I thought I'd leave this note here if anyone is/was interested in a full list of Volvo-owned or Volvo-joint venture plants. There are also multiple contract assembly plants (not Volvo owned) which are missing from the table... I will try to include them as well in the near future. Cheers, Aero777 (talk) 15:37, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assembly plants 

message: This new section, in its current form, seems problematic. It has many sources that all fail to explain where they get their numbers from, most sources are repeated dozens of times and most of the content is a direct copy from the given sources. Can someone with more experience take a look and determine the best way forward? 2A04:4540:1712:1501:A1D7:E56C:7D76:3AC4 (talk) 18:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a question at theWikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard in July 2017, but it was never answered. The website does look like it's self-published, and there is no way to know what kind of editorial control and fact-checking they use. I also think that the section may be overly detailed, and almost WP:FANCRUFT or WP:NOTSTATS. I've asked for comments at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles where there probably are some editors that have discussed the source and similar lists before. Sjö (talk) 06:38, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The annual sales figures by country were eventually sourced, and proved to be a copy-paste WP:COPYVIO and has now been removed twice.   Just because the info is attributed, doesn't mean we can plagiarize it.  Pease do not re-add it without an OTRS ticket from the copyright holder.   Toddst1 (talk) 17:17, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that  has now been blocked for continuing to add this material. Toddst1 (talk) 16:03, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

text:  Facts cannot be copyrighted - Sales figures are just numbers & facts. As far as I know, only the expression of facts can be copyrights, but the article is just quoting facts listed on some external sites. Raysonho (talk) 13:25, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  As per your own text the expression or in a broader sense the way information is presented can be copyrighted. Which makes the copy+paste nature of the whole section a potential problem. Or is that okay? I would also disagree that the article is just quoting facts, given that the website in question is a self described blog and does not give proper credit to its sources. As such at the moment there are no facts quoted, only numbers. The same content had been removed once before in January so I fail to see what has changed. 2A04:4540:902:D00:31B8:C628:CC65:31F4 (talk) 18:22, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I sort of agree. We can make the section present the data in a different way. Raysonho (talk) 00:06, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sales figures 

message: It’s written as if it’s something innovative, but I’m sure that other car manfrs have offered similar deals for years.  Care to agree?  If so, please cut it.  Thanks.  Boscaswell talk 21:22, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete final para. in History section? 

message: * Volvo electric Supercar (www.motor1.com)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.34.85.148 (talk) 23:22, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Good-News"?! (Italian Web) 

message: Change:
The company's main marketing arguments are safety and its Swedish heritage and design.
To:
The company's main marketing arguments are safety, it's Swedish heritage and design. 24.232.57.8 (talk) 17:39, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: That would be less readable and grammatically incorrect. Actualcpscm (talk) 21:02, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 June 2023