Talk:Ignacio A. Santos School of Medicine

message: :Image:EMIS.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:EMIS.jpg

message: I consider the previous information about EMIS's results in the Mexican "Examen Nacional de Residencias Médicas" is important for the reader. That's the reason why I decided to place it again on the page, and I don't know why I'm continously reverted and received a message telling me my edit is considered vandalism. The information has reliable sources that prove what's being said. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.160.54.29 (talk • contribs) 
:...and why should it stay up when the original account to add it (User:Epididymus10), who has a history of vandalism, was unjustified in adding it per this comment?  Also, the edit inappropriately places the  template below external links, which is out of keeping with the manual of style.  WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 01:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit about EMIS's results in ENARM

message: I've been taking a closer look at the information that was previously added several times, and it seems the last source is correct and up-to-date (EMIS was ranked second place in 2010, the first one being Universidad Panamericana, and historically it has the greatest percentage of alumni enrolled in a medical residency program in Mexico since the ENARM was implemented as an evaluation tools for Mexican students interested in having a medical specialty). I'm a member of the Educational Commision for Foreign Medical Graduates (US organization responsible of selecting foreign students for a medical residency in American hospitals and institutios), and I'm aware of how good this school's (EMIS) performance has been within the last years. However, please pay close attention to the source being cited, because new 2011 ENARM results will be available in October/November and statistics might change. RaspberryKlonopin (talk) 07:40, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I imagine, however, that this still suffers from the OR problem noted above?  I have reverted it, for now, to wait and see what others think.  Dbrodbeck (talk) 11:22, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The source is primary, but it's reliable (unfortunately it's the only Mexican institution that has the authority for publishing this particular type of information, and I'm not able to find a reliable secondary source). It seems we should include the information and add the "original research" template for other editors to be aware, what do you think?RaspberryKlonopin (talk) 04:38, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a thought yeah, but I still would like to wait for others opinions, assuming they are still watching the page, the other user was a vandal, and  a POV pusher, so it was hard to take him seriously.  However, that is not the case here I think.  As I said, let's wait a few days and see. Dbrodbeck (talk) 04:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Reconsidering previous "controversial edit"

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ignacio A. Santos School of Medicine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060517013928/http://dcs.mty.itesm.mx/index.html to http://dcs.mty.itesm.mx/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:41, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified