lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Code Name: The Cleaner

message: Could it be worth adding what video game he likes that's the reason he thought he was a secret agent? TheBlazikenMaster 16:40, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video game. 

message: The article currently includes a section "See also" which includes a link to a German film Mord ist mein Geschäft, Liebling. I do not see how these two films are related in anything but the most vague sense of both having mistaken-identity-hitman plots. Perhaps someone else can clarify, but the section probably needs to be removed from both articles. -- 109.77.88.99 (talk) 23:12, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also
Talk:Colour Me Kubrick

message: I don't know when, but this film was definitely released way before 2007. -Gohst 04:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Release Date

message: Not enough info in this article to stand alone. Kingdom(Hearts)Come (talk) 14:41, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Colour Me Kubrick (soundtrack)]] into [[Colour Me Kubrick]]
Talk:Amda Seyon (disambiguation)

message: which one is the usurper? it's not all that clear--BBLove 19:53, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Amda Seyon is almost always used to refer to the famous early 14th c. King, so I am moving this page to Amda Seyon (disambiguation), adding a disambig template to the top of Amda Seyon I, and making this page a redirect to Amda Seyon I. — ዮም (Yom) | contribs • Talk • E 02:54, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:GWR 111 The Great Bear

message: I seem to remember seeing the valve gear/motion from The Great Bear (later Viscount Churchill) on display at the previous Swindon Museum many years ago (before it moved to STEAM). If so does anyone know what happened to it? Also have the name/numberplates also not survived? Andywebby (talk) 16:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: One nameplate appears to be at the NRM. You may have seen the wooden mockup of the scissors valvegear from No. 40, which was at the museum. Ning-ning (talk) 08:42, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's unlikely that the valve gear/motion from The Great Bear was preserved. As built, the cylinders and motion (and several other items) were identical to those of the Star class (except no. 40, later 4000, as noted above), and therefore also identical to the components used on the Castle class. Thus, when no. 111 was rebuilt as a Castle in 1924, most (if not all) of the valve gear components would have been re-used; but in time, as they wore out, they would have been replaced with new components, and few originals would have been left by the time of withdrawal in 1953. Since they were standard parts, some may have been reconditioned and fitted to other Castles. --Redrose64 (talk) 13:44, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Surviving Artifacts
Talk:NOOMA

message: i changed the company name to flannel. flannel is the non-profit company, nooma is the product.  --divinevelocity 04:10, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Company Name Change

message: According to the Nooma Facebook group, they are shooting an upcoming film called 'She':
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=388373&o=all&op=1&view=all&subj=21600640369&aid=-1&id=501627878&oid=21600640369
I'm not sure if this is just speculation as I've heard no official word other than this picture. Should this be added to the page in a tentative state or left until further confirmation?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JoelCornah (talk • contribs) 12:52, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Future Noomas

message: It would be nice to have the release dates for all of the Nooma's. Maybe I'll get inspired when I get out of work :) --rob3r
these videos are awesome - i can't believe wikipedia is considering deleting it! the videos reflect how to live a better life and how to look at events that happen to us.  Jesus lived a perfect life and we can live a better life by learning how to be like Him.   bkent  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bktours (talk • contribs) 02:31, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Release dates

message: The proposed deletion of this article was declined.  The concern was "Per Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Non-commercial_organizations and Wikipedia:Notability (films) - notability not established, no secondary references, promotional tone. Unable to find any secondary references to denote notability in google."    If some good independent reliable sources are added to the article, then of course it should stay.  But otherwise, sorry, it should go to Articles for Deletion debate.       Eclipsed   (talk)   (code of ethics)      16:14, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Velvet Elvis is ref'd, and is a reliable source.  Additionally, these are considered independently-produced artistic works/publications, themselves.  They were originally linked to the Rob Bell article, but because the series is owned by Flannel and not fully limited to Bell, Nooma became a separate article.--Lyonscc (talk) 17:46, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: On related note, please see active discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Velvet Elvis: Repainting the Christian Faith (2nd nomination)      Eclipsed   (talk)   (code of ethics)      17:12, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Declined Proposed Deletion
Talk:Parade (1974 film)

message: https://www.criterion.com/films/28123-parade
https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/parade-1986
https://letterboxd.com/film/parade/
https://www.jonathanrosenbaum.net/2018/07/parade-2/
https://www.criterionchannel.com/parade
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0071968/
220.253.95.243 (talk) 07:33, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  External references
Talk:Hampton Court Palace

message: If anybody wants to argue that Hampton Court palace isn't in Middlesex, perhaps they would like to take it up with the editors of the Victoria County History of Middesex, who include Hampton Court Palace in their volume Middlesex II. Zythophile (talk) 12:05, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It was in 1911 when they published. It isn't now. Johnbod (talk) 14:12, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's in Middlesex 

message: Surprised no mention here. His article says: "He was prolific and received many commissions, including at Hampton Court Palace, Melbourne Hall, Castle Howard, Buckingham Palace, and Chatsworth. Many of his statues were cast in lead." Martinevans123 (talk) 15:38, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[John Nost]] 

message: The article states "which was intended to rival the Palace of Versailles". Is there a realiable source for that claim? Clearly, Hampton Court does neither compare in size nor style, so it seems doubtful what the intentions were. ♆ CUSH ♆ 05:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Versailles 

message: Not a single mention of the county where it actually is...
"Hampton Court Palace, Hampton Court Way, Molesey, East Molesey, Surrey, England, UK."
Danstarr69 (talk) 07:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the postal address but the border between Richmond and Molesley is the River Thames here. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 09:59, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surrey 

message: I am returning to England in June and want to again visit Hampton Court Palace but in checking your web site there is no mention of ticketing.  Can/should I buy tickets in advance?  Do I need to? If so are they only good in a specific day?
thank you so much,
chonna 67.216.150.81 (talk) 16:35, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Suggest you look at their website, this is not a travel guide. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 16:40, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tickets
Talk:The Sorrow and the Pity

message: According to his article, Ophuls prefers to spell his last name without the umlaut, since his father dropped it when he took French citizenship, and indeed his article does not use it anywhere. The French article about the film likewise does not use the umlaut. Yet we do.
Is there consensus for removing it from this article on that basis? Daniel Case (talk) 01:15, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No objection having been voiced or comment made, I'm doing this. Daniel Case (talk) 20:04, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the umlaut
Talk:Hurricane Jose (1999)

message: Should this article be merged? Not too much useful content, and much of it can be placed easily in the seasonal article. Hurricanehink 20:43, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree,but i have this storm in my LNBS hurricanes.It'll do better there.HurricaneCraze32 23:02, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Me too. This one is even less notable than its companion Kyle (2002). Definately merge this one. -- §HurricaneERIC§ archive 01:00, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, than it's agreed. What should be kept? Hurricanehink 04:32, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Impact and Lack of Retirement.HurricaneCraze32 23:41, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure. Axe ready. -- §HurricaneERIC§ archive 18:30, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Hella von Sinnen

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 01:24, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: You find them on German wiki--Nicetobe 20:07, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Dirt Dog

message: 5/28/07 - I'm adding Kevin Millar.
would appreciate it if people editing the page took the time to explain their removal of totally validated sections. Lionelxhutz 20:32, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The guy who added that (Mack Daddy) doesn't have any other edits to his name, so I'm not sure this is just a vandalism thing. Mack Daddy, if you come back and want to replace the language, just add a source - while may be 'astute,' I'm not sure it's true. --Gopple 19:46, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey 68.64.168.213, I see you added the racism/race-baiting language back into Dirt Dogs, albeit in a different section. I have no problem keeping it there if it is sourced. But I don't think it should stay there as a random opinion. In the meantime, I've removed it again.  --Gopple 00:34, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Quintus Lutatius Catulus (consul 102 BC)

message: The stemma of the gens Julia is well-known, even if that for the gens Lutatia is less so. Regardless, that Q. Catulus was born Sex. Julius Caesar, was first cousin to C. Caesar's (ie. the dictator's) father, and was adopted into to gens Lutatia from gens Julia is, as far as I call tell, pure rubbish.
First, the dictator had no first cousin. His only uncle (Sex. Caesar, praetor in 123 BC) left no known children. Second, the praenomen of Q. Catulus' father is known, and it isn't Sextus. The son's filiation - Q.f. - shows that he was the natural son of a Quintus. Thus the son of another Q. Lutatius Catulus.
See T.R.S. Broughton (1951) Magistrates of the Roman Republic Vol.1 p.567; C. Settipani (2000) Continuite Gentilice et Continuite Familiale dans les Familles Senatoriales Romaines a l'Epoque Imperiale p. 67.
82.44.82.167 (talk) 10:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Catulus Caesar"
Talk:Shakes the Clown

message: Why is this film saddled with a big infobox across the bottom that has all of Adam Sandler's films listed? Sandler's role in Shakes was relatively minor. Somebody who loves Sandler is working to be a completist but I'm envisioning a future wherein the article becomes bogged down in filmlist boxes for some 32 actors and perhaps even filmlist boxes for directors, composers, best boys and catering. Can we get rid of this filmlist box without upsetting somebody's applecart? Binksternet 04:16, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: People use Navboxes as an excuse to include a whole lot of irrelevant links that would be deleted if they were included in any other section of the article. One Navbox, the most relevant to the primary topic for any article, usually the director should be more than enough for most articles. In this case the navbox for Bobcat Goldthwait is plenty. -- 109.76.134.165 (talk) 19:49, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: proposal to delete Adam Sandler filmlist

message: The part of the male barfly who looked like Milton Berle was played by Martin Charles Warner. Berle was not in the movie. Binksternet (talk) 15:14, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Milton Berle
Talk:Scouting in New York

message: I was looking to create a page for the Adirondack Council. The Adirondack Council () is a non-profit with a $2.5M annual budget as per their webpage (). It's widely featured in news articles about the park. Googling suggests several dozen news articles in 2022 alone from the New York Times and various Adirondack publications among others.
So imagine my surprise when I found out Adirondack Council directs here. There should at least be a disambiguation page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CallOftheLoon (talk • contribs) 21:55, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: , hello! I just created Adirondack Council (Boy Scouts). You can use the redirect as you see fit. Good luck with your effort. --evrik (talk) 22:10, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adirondack Council
Talk:Death to Smoochy

message: The lede paragraph contains this line, "This film also shows [Robin Williams] as his antithesis incarnate, since he plays a corrupted, nearly psychopathic children's TV host." I do not understand what this is supposed to mean.Seantrinityohara (talk) 19:16, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: What Does This Mean?

message: Would it be appropriate to list some of the tactics Rainbow Randolph uses to discredit Smoochy?  I wouldn't describe entire scenes in detail, but short summaries  ought to be OK...(For instance, Randolph switches the cookies and curses on live TV; he poses as a children's TV advocate in order to trick Smoochy into performing at a Nazi rally.)  --ISNorden 21:19, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sabotage attempts--more detail needed? 

message: Anyone care to mention the apparent cult status of this film now? Mcflytrap 21:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can personally state that this film is a cult classic. It's popular with a large number of intellectuals, as the movie has a lot of hidden social commentaries. For the dangers of mass marketing and the effects media has on children, there is a lot of material in the movie that people overlook. Coolgamer (talk) 02:50, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Any 'big-name' third party reliable source would certainly be appropiate for the article. Has a nationally publicized movie critic called it a cult status? Lots42 (talk) 08:16, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cult Status 

message: "... for its vulgar humor"?
I don't think it is. It's not like it's South Park or something. In the film, the absurdist-parodical comedy and the satire are just as prominent. Sources, or is this just something someone made up? ~Switch t c g 04:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Known mostly... 

message: Nothing more to add here. :-) Waltham, The Duke of 09:45, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The second reference (about the film's cult status) does not work
Talk:House of D

message: Hey, did anyone mention that this was rated one of the worst 25 movies of 2005 or something like that? ForestAngel 20:56, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hey

message: Can someone tell me the use of the hyperlink to the USD-page? Alibobar (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 03:17, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: $

message: this does not explain enough about the show Squirrely2 (talk) 01:37, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  what about
Talk:The TV Set

message: Though this film was competently made and the acting was in no way poor, as a whole this film does not exceed the standards of the American Television Industry, and indeed it seems that it did not attempt to be much above a passably entertaining piece of work which only lightly lampoons the television industry.  Its main theme seems to be that television is aimed at the least common denominator of the tv watching public, and that anything which attempts to rise beyond that standard will inevitably be consigned to the scrap heap.  The pilot, the main 'actor' of the film, begins as a genuine piece of artistic effort, with a comedy driven by the tragedy of human experience, as many great comedies are... but through 'focus testing' and with the assistance of the superior television experience of the studio executives, all trace of art is bashed down, pared off, and polished into a brilliant gem of mediocrity.
If someone wants to reword the above to make it less POV and more encyclopedic, feel free, it's my impression, having just seen the movie.  I would rate it a solid 6 on a scale of 1-10, and no more, yet there is not really anything I could really complain about.  The acting is competent, the technical side is fine, it just really seemed not very great, and it seemed as if that was exactly what it was trying to be. User:Pedant 01:31, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance of this film/review
Talk:Connie and Carla

message: Connie and Carla  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.68.32.86 (talk) 17:33, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connie and Carla 

message: No word about the inspiration?
31.154.8.98 (talk) 18:58, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some like it hot
Talk:The X-Files (film)

message: What about the lone gunmen? Aren't they main characters? Gvanrossum (talk) 03:47, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Five main characters from the television series appear in the film" 
Category talk:Buffalo, New York

message: Folks: I am adding some things to the Buffalo category that others might argue belong in the "Erie County" category.  My reasoning is that the E.C. cat is loaded with small, outlying towns and cultural entries will tend to get lost in that listing.  I think it is better to gather the cultural stuff in the Buffalo category.  Feedback? -- Pinktulip 20:18, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have added a few things, mostly Love Canal related, to the Buffalo category because the Niagara Falls category seems to be mostly about the Falls rather than about the region. -- Pinktulip 12:43, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Niagara Falls
Talk:Scouting in Mississippi

message: :- ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 13:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: *OPPOSEThe 'Scouting In Mississippi' article contains almost zero info on councils.  Merging it with it current Pushmataha Area Council information would make 'Scouting In Mississippi' cumbersome.  To lose this information would be detrimental to the body of knowledge.
*Oppose Seriously, someone wants to merge that whole article into this one? No thanks. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 04:52, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pushmataha Area Council

message: Isn't there a venturing troop in MS?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Poohman0 (talk • contribs) 00:35, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venturing 
Talk:Accident (1967 film)

message: The Accident is based on an event in the life of the Oxford Don Raymond Carr. Carr was a friend of Nicholas Moseley. After the appearance of the film he feared he might lose his job, but the scandal blew over and caused no lasting harm to his career. The incident is referred to in a review of a biography of Raymond Carr called Raymond Carr, La curiosidad del zorro by María Jesús González that appeared on 23 August 2011 in the Times Literary Supplement. The article is entitled Oxford, Spain and the High Life and is signed  by Ronald Fraser. Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 17:44, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raymond Carr 
Talk:Very Happy Alexander

message: I removed the previous sentence because, even in French in English-speaking wikipedia, it makes no sense.
Ultrogothe 10:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk removed

message: An anon added a POV, but interesting, comment about an analysis of the movie, setting the tone of this piece of art & linking it to the major event the year after its release : May 1968 social uprising events in French society.
The comment is in French, in WP:FR. I might be able to translate it properly. As I said, it is clearly a POV ; yet since the article is currently empty, is it worth to translate it (I liked the comment, that's obvious).
May be a first step to set an article for the movie ?
Ultrogothe 10:09, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment by an anon
Talk:William Crooks (locomotive)

message: In consulting official sources, I find that the William Crooks has not been actually listed on the National Register of Historic Places.  I'm guessing a nomination was submitted in 1974 but it was never officially accepted, likely due in part to the uncertainty about where it would end up at the time.  Although a couple non-governmental sources claim otherwise, neither the NPS Focus database nor the Minnesota Historical Society's database confirm that this locomotive is on the NRHP.  I am removing the NRHP content from this article. -McGhiever (talk) 00:28, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not on National Register 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:William Crooks at station.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on . You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2018-11-18. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 23:01, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image from this article to appear as POTD soon 

message: How is it that the locomotive was built in the year the U.S. Civil War began, but named after someone who earlier served in that war? SlowJog (talk) 00:42, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that choice of phrasing is suspect and have changed it. More knowledge about the actual Mr. Crooks could help solve the mystery. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 05:23, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Namesake history confusion
Talk:Scouting in the United States Virgin Islands

message: The content of Virgin Islands Council should be merged to the NCAC article leaving a summary. --  Gadget850 (Ed) talk 20:10, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  VIC 

message: The website still calls it "council", reading the language, I am not convinced it was an acquisition.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 07:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  acquired or affiliated?
Talk:Weisslacker

message: With regard to the recipe:  Beer is a general term, are there specific types of beers that work well? (Should one use a beer that is similar to the beer one would be drinking/dipping with the cheese, or a different beer to have a contrast...).  Also, I assume "bottle" means 12 oz. (I'll be updating the article to support that theory).
* It appears to me that the recipe I deleted has nothing to do with Beer cheese which is a specific kind of smelly cheese that has nothing to do with combining beer and some other kind of cheese. --Droll 04:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recipe