Talk:Frozen (House)

message: The plot summary was lifted right from:
http://tv.ign.com/objects/907/907453.html
So I deleted it, per wikipedia policy. Llamabr (talk) 18:10, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: Should article include speculative example of breaking the forth wall? The second example is speculative & both examples lack references.
:I agree with the deletion.  The whole argument shows why the guidelines on original research exist.  I'm not generally against trivia if it is interesting trivia, and doesn't take up much space, but in this case it is generating far more controversy than it's worth, and can be rightly deleted under WP's guidelines for lack of reliable sources.  BTW, the term is "fourth wall" as in the number four, not "forth." Its WP entry explains why.Fritter (talk) 17:26, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *I don't think this article should include fourth wall speculation without secondary sources providing evidence. Its an interesting idea, worthy of discussion here on the talk page, but it must be classed as WP:OR until sources can be found. I recomend deletion too. --Gavin Collins (talk) 10:02, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

text: It's a rather unremarkable example of the way television and similar articles get written without sources. Since it looks like speculation rather than spelling out what is obvious to any viewer, the article is better off without it. --Michael Snow (talk) 19:12, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree, I don't know why that would be included, to be frank. nedragehtnistercesruodeirubew 18:54, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC: Should article include speculative example of breaking the forth wall?

message: there is one logical mistake in the diagnosis:
house orderes her to make a complete x-ray of her whole body; discussing the pictures with wilson, you can see that indeed pictures of kate's body were made. someone should have noticed the broken toe there... --91.11.109.37 (talk) 18:18, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logical Mistake 

message: Since  refuses to discuss differences of opinion on talk pages, and I don't wish to edit war by repeatedly reverting his edits, I am opening up discussion here. I believe removal of sourced information is inappropriate, even if mentioned in another article, and even if TenPoundHammer disputes that a source is reliable. It should be discussed here, per WP:CON as well as common courtesy. Cresix (talk) 18:21, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Please wait for others to comment rather than instantly reverting. Cresix (talk) 18:43, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Do we get a say in all this, you know as the people who contributed to those pages. You could have marked them for more sources or citations, you are going ahead without a community consensus or so much as a warning that these pages are going to be removed. It might be a while but I'm going to guess that others might also have a problem with this, there are a few people who took the time and compiled links and provided sources which you blatantly wrote off.--Theo10011 (talk) 18:53, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of sourced information 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Frozen (House). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051001064816/http://tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1%2C1002%2C272%7C%7C%7Cweekly%2C00.html to http://tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1%2C1002%2C272%7C%7C%7Cweekly%2C00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Frozen (House). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100130193650/http://foxflash.com/div.php/main/page?aID=1z2z2z83z6z8&ID=4725 to http://www.foxflash.com/div.php/main/page?aID=1z2z2z83z6z8&ID=4725
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110923041206/http://www.fox.com/house/recaps/season-4/episode-11.htm to http://www.fox.com/house/recaps/season-4/episode-11.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified