lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Snapcase

message: sorry but snapcase isn't metalcore, they definetly belong to the hardcore community.
:I agree, although it's kind of a one-sided argument right now.
Did anyone actually read through this and verify anything that the article said about Snapcase?  About how "many feel" that they're one of the most iconoclastic intellectual influential inspirational hardcore bands of all time?  What a load of crap.  This has to have been written by their label.
mutt is gay. 24.93.207.160 03:56, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kinetic momentum

message: This article appears to be confusing "gauge invariant" and "Lorentz invariant". I certainly don't know what "Lorentz gauge covariant" means. Melchoir 22:16, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

message: both links to additional information are dead.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.207.37.176 (talk) 14:33, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead external links

message: I tidied up the messy page: corrected and cleaned some of the notation, re-wrote the terminology. Added sources and removed the source tag. Removed the stub tab, shouldn't be anymore at this satge - it is on sufficient footing to be expanded.... Hopefully made it all clearer.
F=q(E+v^B) (talk) 21:19, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I found a reliable source for the terminology - it'll be added. Will try to find more. Also changed q back to e (my fualt), since q can be used for general coords if needed. --  F = q(E + v × B) 13:41, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Add sources
Talk:Fowler Middle School (Portland, Oregon)

message: Hi, I was just copyediting this page and wondered if maybe the two divisions (Cascade and Pacific) could be explained further.  I don't really see a point in inculding them in the article if there is nothing else to say about them.  Just a thought! HusikaSN 22:21, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cascade and Pacific
Talk:Peter Chilvers

message: Peter Chilvers does not appear to hold ANY patents related to windsurfing or sailing - DEFINITELY NOT in the USA (a search of USPTO.gov and google.com/patents confirms this) - and none can be found in EPO databases either. If you have knowledge of Peter Chilvers patents related to windsurfing, please provide links or patent numbers to support this. The reference to Peter Chilvers patents will be struck unless it can be supported with source material. Merryfrankster 18:06, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please do not delete Citation Needed tags.  You can help by contributing verifiable sources.  This article has needed cites for literally years.  You know what happens to unsourced material?  Deletionists just delete it.  I just tagged it, and it will stay tagged until improved.  --Lexein (talk) 12:36, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP editors
Talk:The Ringworld Engineers

message: ==Untitled==
I have removed the following two items from the "[publication history]".
*1970, USA, Ballantine Books ISBN-13: 9780345020468, Hardcover
*1979, USA, Phantasia Press ISBN-13: 9780932096036, Hardcover
The first paragraph states that the book was first published in 1980. Therefore, these two references must be false. It also casts a dubious light on the remaining items in the publication history.
-- pedant (talk) 11:48, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication History Issue 

message: I have removed the following two items from the "[publication history]".
*1970, USA, Ballantine Books ISBN-13: 9780345020468, Hardcover
*1979, USA, Phantasia Press ISBN-13: 9780932096036, Hardcover
The first paragraph states that the book was first published in 1980. Therefore, these two references must be false. It also casts a dubious light on the remaining items in the publication history.
-- pedant (talk) 11:48, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: how coy, lets not say what happened to her. folks, always read the novel or see the movie before reading the article here, as the plot summary should reveal all significant plot points. I would add it, but i dont quite recall exactly what happened to her.99.23.83.211 (talk) 03:04, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Teela
Talk:Invisible wall

message: I removed the wording that said the no-clip option will allow travel outside of the game's overworld invisible barriers. This can only be done through editing that feature off within the .ini file. However for all standard or interior invisible walls, no-clip bypasses them. 74.128.56.194 (talk) 18:11, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed Oblivion/Fallout 3 

message: If you can find a secondary source citing why a specific example of an invisible wall is notable, feel free to add it. Otherwise, Wikipedia is not the place to make a list of invisible walls editors happened to have found within games. No original research. Maplestrip (talk) 09:48, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples
Talk:The Fountains of Paradise

message: I'm not comfortable with adding my own edits, but perhaps someone with better writing skills can add a reference to the world wide computer network described in this book. Long before the Internet, Clark envisioned something very similar to the real world Google and 'intelligent agents' Where some abstract computer cloud network could be used to search for keywords and make a customized 'news paper' 
I think that was original enough to be worth mentioning in this article.
:University 'gopher' and so on were around at this time and are the real fore-runners of the 'web as we know it today.  Also, such global-computing networks have been used in sci-fi for decades - it would be hard-pressed to prove Clarke envisioned such before anyone else.  He still gets credit for the communication satellite idea! HammerFilmFan (talk) 16:10, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I have split the plot into a summary and a detailed subsection. Also, because the plot is driven entirely by technology and sociology while eschewing character development, I have eliminated the Characters section which didn't seem to add anything. Anyone disapprove? Hungrydog55 (talk) 13:24, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot revamp
Talk:Titan (Varley novel)

message: This novel was originally serialized in a science fiction magazine (Analog I believe) before being published in book form. Can anyone dig up and include the information on this? MK2 (talk) 23:04, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Magazine serialization

message: I think the plot synopsis is out of order somewhat -- specifically, I thought the rape happened before they encountered the Titanides.  I'm not sure if I have a copy of the book.  If I do, I'll check it and see.
Rmd1023 (talk) 20:48, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Gene was still around when they encountered the Titanides. He tried to give them explosives, or something, I think. The rape happened while they were climbing the spoke. They abandoned Gene at that point. --yycguy81 (Talk) 15:23, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot Synopsis Out of Order?
Talk:The Faded Sun Trilogy

message: I have only read the first book of the trilogy but it seems to me that the character list for the article only covers that one book. Koala Tea Of Mercy (KTOM's Articulations & Invigilations) 15:08, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters section needs expansion 

message: I have serious concerns whether Mri merit a stand-alone article (due to failing WP:GNG). Recently User:Waxworker prodded that article, and User:Bruce1ee deprodded it adding some potential sources. Unless someone feels like converting the potential sources into a section that establishes notability (which, I note, Bruce has done recently at Alliance–Union_universe#Critical_reception), I'd suggest redirecting Mri here, with no objection to merging everything (even through right now, Bruce sources aside, all we have is pretty much WP:FANCRUFT/WP:ALLPLOT...). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:51, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge to The Faded Sun Trilogy. —Bruce1eetalk 10:19, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @Bruce1ee I redirected this to Alliance–Union universe, sentient species section. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:56, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Piotrus: That's fine with me. —Bruce1eetalk 11:33, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Mri (fictional alien species)]] 

message: The introduction contains the following sentence: Both the mri and the regul fulfill John W. Campbell's dictum of "show me a creature that thinks as well as a man, or better, but not like a man."
A citation is given for the sentence, but it's from the introduction to a Larry Niven book. It's not clear if that source argues that Cherryh's fictional species meet Campbell's formula or if it is simply a source for the quotation in question. If anyone is able to verify the text of that introduction, that would be appreciated.  Handpigdad (talk) 04:39, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, the introduction in question is available on google books and it doesn't seem to directly comment on either Campbell's statements or Cherryh's book. I am removing the sentence from the article, as it appears to be original research. Handpigdad (talk) 04:43, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Campbell quote
Talk:Ja'far ibn Yahya

message: As the name implies, the villainous Grand Vizier of the Iznogoud comics is, in fact, called Iznogoud — not any variation of "Ja'far". I do not know whether Iznogoud should still be mentioned, as a villainous Grand Vizier plotting to overthrow a caliph called Harun is obviously still inspired by the popular Arabian Nights-based depiction of Ja'far (especially The Thief of Bagdad), but something needs to be done.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.34.106.158 (talk) 20:07, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I too found it odd that Iznogoud is mentioned in a way that suggests such an identification. Unless somebody can point to a statement by the authors "yes we meant Ja'far", or there are episodes where Iznogoud is called Ja'far -- which I don't recall ever seeing -- then there wasn't a reason to assume that this specific vizier was being referenced. I have removed the mention of Iznogoud. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 16:20, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Iznogoud

message: In this edit Kwamikagami changed the spelling of the name from Jafar ibn Yahya Barmaki to Jafar ibn Yahya Barmaki but ʻOkina is supposedly usually for Polynesian glottal stops. Is there a standard convention that the transliteration should use it for this name? By the way, the article gives the Arabic first name as جعفر which seems to be (right to left) the Arabic letters jīm ʿayn ghayn rah. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 14:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I was trying to bring some consistency to the articles. The okina is only used for ayin when transcribing Arabic and Persian, but {ayin} would be fine here too. — kwami (talk) 19:18, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling
Talk:Jassem Al-Kharafi

message: This page has been ridiculously damaged. How to restore it?
Hamdan2 20:18, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Paul Vanden Boeynants

message: Removed:
 Murat Kaplan, one of them, escaped again when he was granted a weekend parole, on July 17, 2006.
Kaplan joined the two Haemers-gang members when they escaped from jail. However he was not himself member of that gang and therefore is not relevant to the kidnapping of VdB. BertK 22:31, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, there is one source (Belga) that reported Kaplan being a member of the Haemers Gang. Anyways, that he broke away with 2 of the kidnappers of Vanden Boeynants seems to enough for a brief mention though? Intangible 18:40, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Murat Kaplan

message: Why refer to the kidnapping being disputed, but give no reason for the claim?Royalcourtier (talk) 09:57, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kidnapping mystery 

message: The statement that "Vanden Boeynants escaped jail but was sentenced to three years" makes no sense at all.Royalcourtier (talk) 09:58, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imprisoned but not imprisonsed.
Talk:Charlie Barnet

message: I would suggest that the section on his marriages needs to be edited to reflect a more neutral, less judgmental tone. Information about this aspect of his life has a place in the article, but moralising personal opinions about  Barnet's reported attitudes definitely don't. Dunks (talk) 13:20, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barnet's marriages 
Talk:Pennsylvania Route 97 (Adams County)

message: I proposed to merge Pennsylvania Route 97 (Adams County) into Maryland Route 97, since both highways have the same number, and the section in Pennsylvania is much shorter than the one in Maryland. Plus since there is another PA 97 in Erie County, which could provide more disambiguation between people on Wikipedia wanting to know location of the two PA 97's. By merging this article, readers can clearly tell that this PA 97 intercepts the Maryland state line. 2601:202:203:BA70:2436:4CF6:55CC:3451 (talk) 00:22, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You shouldn't vote if you're the one who proposed it. Needforspeed888 (talk) 13:51, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal
Talk:Kamal Nasser

message: Washington post is NOT a relevant source of information. Whole paragraph about his death is based on some article written by sensationalistic journalist.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.169.86.158 (talk) 16:44, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: The sentence 'All three men had made Israel's Operation Wrath of God target list for their participation in the massacre of eleven members of the 1972 Israeli Olympic team in Munich' is unreferenced and possibly false, particularly with regard to Kamal Nasser, and  should be deleted. 91.125.162.10 (talk) 23:23, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right: such a serious charge need proper WP:RS, which wasn't there. (I have no idea if he was involved or not, but the  case of the Lillehammer affair showed that the Israeli intel wasn't always brilliant, to put it diplomatically). At most we can say that Israel alleged he was part Munich planning, but at the moment not even that is in the sources. Removed. Huldra (talk) 23:50, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 April 2018 

message: Seriously, User:יניב הורון, whatever gave you the idea to insert this, unsourced?? Did you think you can say anything about a dead Palestinian, as long as you state it is  alleged....without any source? Please revert, Huldra (talk) 20:38, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  unsourced info 

message: Even though it is easy to find sources saying that Kamal Nasser was directly involved in the Munich massacre, I'm suspicious. For example this book by a well-known Israeli historian says that the assassination "seems to have little connection to Munich". Or this book which lists the three Fatah leaders killed and says that two them (the two other than Nasser) were suspected of providing support for the Munich massacre. The same formula which pointedly excludes Nasser from the involvement in Munich attributed to the other two appears in "Israel's Secret Wars" (Black and Morris, p275). Zerotalk 13:31, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Munich massacre
Talk:Philippine Idol contestants

message: Article reads like a press release or something from a teen magazine.
Lectricky 22:39, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Why should this be a stub instead of a redirect?  There are no sources, and no indication of coming anywhere close to meeting WP:BIO standards for inclusion.  When and if this person does something noteworthy, she can have her own article.  Friday (talk) 18:42, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: She's a reality show contestant.  That should easily do the trick for notability.  There's no reason whatsoever to turn this into a redirect. --badlydrawnjeff talk 18:46, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see nothing in WP:BIO about "anyone who's ever been on television."  Friday (talk) 18:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not yet, no.  Just because WP:BIO has yet to catch up to actual reality.  Besides that, reality contestants should fall under "Notable actors and television personalities who have appeared in well-known films or television productions," definitely fall under "just because someone doesn't fall into one of these categories doesn't mean an article on the person should automatically be deleted," and there probably should be a reality television clause if people need it epxlicitly spelled out. --badlydrawnjeff talk 18:54, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone who's a notable actor or television personality is another matter entirely.  This is just someone who was on a reality show.  Have you actually looked at the articles on these contestants?  They're not good.  We're better off with a single, verifiable article on the show than lots of bad stubs.  These individual articles won't tend to be good because the folks who write such stuff aren't interested in making proper articles.  And there are few if  any usable sources, so why would we want to keep this as a standalone article?  Friday (talk) 19:03, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So you know a lot about Phillippine media and publications?  I have no problems with stubs, especially when they certainly can be expanded by the right editors.  When you have a show watched by a large amount of the population, and with a public awareness factor even higher than that, they're certainly well-known television personalities. --badlydrawnjeff talk 19:24, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Stubs are for when an actual decent article could exist.  These people were just flashes in the pan, unless/until they do something else after being on the show.  I'm not saying they couldn't be mentioned in the main article, but pretending we can have proper bios on them is just insanity.  If people really want to track every tiny detail of everything that's ever been on TV, they should make a seperate wiki for that purpose and have at it.  Friday (talk) 15:38, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If stubs are for when an actual decent article could exist, than this really isn't a problematic article at all. --badlydrawnjeff talk 15:45, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect?
Talk:Daijō Tennō

message: This article and Cloistered rule deal exactly with the same topic. Švitrigaila 23:15, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  To merge with [[Cloistered rule]] 
Talk:Cloistered Emperor

message: Seems to me as the same topic as the Cloistered rule article. Should it be merged?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.213.41.2 (talk) 14:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Merging with "Cloistered rule"?
Talk:Honda CB400F

message: I was just wondering how much detail in this article could  be considered as too much detail? I probably have enough material to include refs for most of it but stuff like chassis numbers seems like too much for mc-mos?  MAbbey (talk) 06:56, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, no frame numbers, no colors, no obscure model codes unless they are necessary for clarity. Stick to information that has been published in mainstream books, magazines and newspapers. If you have to dig into a factory workshop manual or special Honda publication to find something, it's probably not appropriate. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 14:54, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent, I will have a go bringing the article up to standard then, thanks. MAbbey (talk) 17:32, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This is derived from WP:SECONDARY; we prefer secondary sources (like MCN or Cycle World) to primary sources, like a workshop manual. That doesn't mean you can never mention paint colors or frame numbers. But we avoid them unless they became notable in the mainstream press, like when the Hayabusa's copper-and-white color scheme caused a stir, or if there were errors in some frame numbers that generated controversy. And also WP:NOTCATALOG; frame numbers are mostly associated with collectors' guides or shopping guides, not an encyclopedia. These guidelines can change, however. Please discuss at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Motorcycling if you think we should do it differently. Thanks for working on this article! --Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  How much detail? 

message: As discussed above, there is too much detail regarding frame numbers and colours etc. If there are no objections I will simplify and remove overly detailed content. 
The article currently mentions the "two" models but also states that there were F, F1 and F2 models. Only the F and F2 were available in the UK so I would hazard a guess that is what has happened here. Will make the model designation and availability clearer. MAbbey (talk) 12:09, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two or three models?  

message: I have reorganised this into a list. I had a look through the MOS but I'm unsure which way is the best way to present the data. MAbbey (talk) 21:26, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variants section  

message: I have added a hat note to this article and I hope that I got it right as per WP:SIMILAR and it is appropriately used. The hat note links to the Honda CB-1 because it appears it was also called the CB400F in some markets, although which ones I'm unsure. The owners manual clearly shows both CB-1 and CB400F designations on the front cover. I have seen one in the UK and it was definitely badged as a CB-1 and US magazines seem to refer to it as the same but I thought it would help to alleviate any potential confusion.  MAbbey (talk) 18:22, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hat note
Talk:Richard M. Bissell Jr.

message: I've amended the aircraft type from B-26 Marauder to Douglas B-26 Invader. See WP articles B-26 Disambiguation and Bay of Pigs Invasion. The JFK reference needs work - I think he said "minimal", not "eight" - eight was final number derived by Hawkins and/or Beerli. Also corrected Bissell's title at CIA to Deputy Director for Plans (DDP). I'm just an aircraft historian, but if anyone wants to use biog stuff and citations, see below quotes from three relevant books. Long passages, feel free to chop it out after extracting any useful stuff for Bissell main article.PeterWD (talk) 18:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrections and sources

message: In the section Bay of Pigs Invasion plans, one sentence says, "As Bissell explained to Kennedy, this meant that the guerrilla fallback option had been removed from the operation." But a later one says, "Bissell added that even if the project failed the invasion force could join the guerrillas in the Escambray Mountains." These seem contradictory. Anyone have reliable sources to clear this up? Burritok (talk) 15:13, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction - what did Bissell tell Kennedy about the guerilla fallback option?
Talk:Yōrō Code

message: The version previous to my revision read "The Code itself, as well as the other ritsuryō codes, is now lost. However, several ulterior documents (such as the Ryō no Gige, a 9th-century document explaining enacted laws) remain and allow for its reconstruction." While I am finding that English-language scholarly commentary gives this assessment, that it is only preserved in fragments, I rewrote it on the basis of a Japanese history dictionary I have at hand, which says that of the Yoro Code, at least the Civil Code/Administrative Code part (The ryō part of ritsuryō) is very nearly preserved. I was able to google multiple Japanese sources backing this, as well as some sources in the West, if you look hard enough.</br>
The Penal Code (the ritsu part of ritsuryō) is largely lost, though a full reconstruction has been attempted on this. I realize a reconstruction is not the same as preservation of the code, and I hope this distinction is plain enough in the manner I phrased it in the article. --Kiyoweap (talk) 00:08, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  State of preservation