Talk:Aerodynamic (instrumental)

message: Any and all references to uncleared samples on Discovery are being militantly removed. Someone will have to explain to me why articles for albums like Big Daddy Kane's Long Live the Kane and Public Enemy's Yo! Bum Rush the Show are allowed to cite an entire album's worth of uncleared samples with NO references, but doing so for Daft Punk WITH references is taboo. I don't think it follows the NPOV guidelines to completely remove any references to uncleared samples.
:The users who continually remove reference to said uncleared samples are obviously more interested in being apologists for and/or denying Daft Punk's uncleared sampling, and are not actually interested in having the article follow Wikipedia's guidelines. 67.164.79.66 (talk) 08:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If there's other articles that don't have sources, be bold and remove those items from the page. The Daft Punk releated articles are regularly maintained by a few people and check the verifiability of the sources in question. As for reverting the claims of Daft Punk using samples, a lot of the claims have no source or if there's any source, it's from a blog that anyone can create and simply make a claim. Also, there are a lot of uncleared and uncertain samples within Daft Punk's discography. The most unique one is Eddie Johns "More Spell on You" with "One More Time" which was something that was shown via YouTube. However, other uncertain samples have either been claimed by some unknown blog or even denied by Daft Punk. See the Discovery article for more information.  Douglasr007 (talk) 20:29, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncleared sample censorship

message: the articles i've readded a direct link to provide a sample for illustrative purposes, and hence are fair use. please discuss the matter before deleting them again. --Kaini 05:12, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: the readdition of a direct link to the sample

message: It's not a guitar - it's a synth that plays the "guitar" solo - it just sounds like a guitar.
Anyone who knows electronic music will know that!!
Cite page: http://www.last.fm/music/Daft+Punk/_/Aerodynamic
Cite evidence from page above: "its a synth. and if you want, ill say you its a virtual synth called "slayer". it comes with FL Studio. try it yourself." made by "[pablors_7]" on Sunday 16 December 2007.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.142.212.149 (talk) 22:37, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps I researched it wrong, but it appears that Slayer was released a year or so after "Aerodynamic". In any case, a reliable source would need to be cited for this information. Just64helpin (talk) 23:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guitar Solo 

message: :Image:DaftPunk Aerodynamic.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:DaftPunk Aerodynamic.jpg

message: I sence Hells Bells in it, anyone else? 98.166.49.125 (talk) 04:55, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hells Bells

message: There seems to be some contention regarding whether "Aerodynamic" should be referred to as an instrumental or as a song.  moved the article from "Aerodynamic (song)" to "Aerodynamic (instrumental)" with the rationale that "Songs have lyrics. This is an instrumental". Some time later  moved the article to "Aerodynamic (Daft Punk song)" inadvertently bypassing the previous "Aerodynamic (song)". When I asked about this, the user's rationale was that "...it was a matter of unifying the disambiguation terms across all entries in the series that need now or may in the future need disambiguation. The standard seems to be "Title ([artist] song)", so I moved it to "Title ([artist] song)"". This is however contradicted by he existence of Burnin' (instrumental) as well as WP:DISAMBIG, which states that disambiguation should be as concise as possible. Hopefully the users who have this contention can discuss this here to reach a consensus on the matter. jhsounds (talk) 17:28, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: A non-vocal musical composition is an "instrumental". A "song" has lyrics as it is sung. The first line of this article says "'Aerodynamic' is an instrumental..." It's simple as that.—Ryulong (琉竜) 17:45, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, move it back then. Doesn't bother me one way or the other. Sven Manguard Wha? 19:59, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instrumental or song  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Aerodynamic (instrumental). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070711002130/http://remixmag.com:80/mag/remix_robopop/ to http://remixmag.com/mag/remix_robopop/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070210012902/http://www.outersound.com:80/inreview/a-d/daftpunk.html to http://www.outersound.com/inreview/a-d/daftpunk.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:58, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Aerodynamic (instrumental). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141110224721/http://mixonline.com/mag/audio_daft_punk/ to http://mixonline.com/mag/audio_daft_punk/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aria.com.au/issue591.PDF
*Added  tag to http://www.daftpunk.de/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050902102036/http://www.virginrecords.com/daft_punk/ to http://www.virginrecords.com/daft_punk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:02, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified