Talk:OGame

message: Sorry all if this messes anything up, it's my first edit =)
Should there be any mention of the controversy raised by officers, as in them being the first benefit available in game that gave a significant advantage through payment?Xela King (talk) 18:08, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there should. There is even a petition online that asks Gameforge to remove the officers. Nyme (talk) 17:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Officers

message: As someone who hasn't played this game I'm a bit confused by the numbers in the first paragraph: "over two million gaming accounts worldwide. The German Ogame has 61 'universes' (servers) with a maximum of 14,000 players each".
Doesn't the second sentence contradict the first? 61 * 14,000 = a maximum of 854,000 players. Just curious what the correct (realistic) number of players is.
That only takes into account the number of players on the German Severs. There are other servers as well, English, Polish, ect. That allows for there to be more then 2 million accounts.
     There are about 300 servers in multiple languages on the first 2 pages of a Google search for "Ogame", if they all had 5000 
     players (as most servers don't have anywhere near the max amount of 14,000) then 300*5000 = 1,500,000 which is close to what they 
     say and even closer when u add the other languages that ain't in the to 2 pages of Google page 
     results.(Figjam88au 17:59, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of players

message: Google shows 6 million hits for "ogame" (and all the first page links are to stuff related to the game). If that is not notability, then what is? Please do not put up for non-notability again.
Many, many thousands of people have played this game spending massive amounts of time (me once included, for several months in 2005) and the two million accounts claim does not ring all too wrong from the scope I saw this game have among online browser gamers.
Max robitzsch 12:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm putting it back for the moment. The article itself does not state how this article meets the criteria in WP:WEB. --InShaneee 12:27, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added info about notability, removed notability tag.
Could the editor that tagged this page please explain the reasons a bit more?  Seems pretty silly to make this a VfD... --JD79 02:10, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

text: As I said, he said in his edit summary that he didn't see this article meeting the standards set down by WP:WEB. --InShaneee 23:38, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Defence and Colonization... Are we using English or American English?
: It is German, thus European. British English is in order. Rama 09:38, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  German made yes. American based (.org) American translated. XD Anubis1055 01:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  There is an American server (.us) seperate from .org.  The .org servers are mainly for European countries that speak English and Australia, even though many Americans and non-English speakers play the .org because it usually runs faster and has more players to begin with. Spartan123209 (talk) 19:34, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: English

message: Don't copy and paste explanations for technologies and buildings directly from OGame. Use them as guidance, but don't plagarize. λλλ - Shiri 22:32, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)
Yah... okay.  I was fixing them up and changing them fairly significantly, but I'll totally rewrite them in the future. A. S. Houdini
The page is starting to look good. Good show. That clean-up tag'll not be necessary soon. λλλ - Shiri 03:39, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)
: There still are some changes that could be made. I don't think we really need a "Different versions" section. --Zarel 19:21, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Please...

message: If you have a problem with it, say something. I've made the page more similar to the other Wikipedia articles about games, in that I explain features of the game instead of making it a bloody player's guide. I figure that's what the external links are for. ~~ Shiri 04:29, Mar 25, 2005 (UTC)
I was thinking there could be a brief description of each ship and the moon features but that'd probably be a little bit too "player's guideish." Da Dohboy 13:08, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Huge copyedit

message: Looks like a 4th universe just opened Wormeyman 09:57, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Uni 15 came out a couple of days ago by the way. Just updating this. ^^ 08:01 EST, Feb 10, 2006 Da Dohboy 13:05, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  4th universe 

message: Anybody know anything about the Russian, Spainsh, etc. versions and would like to discuss them under the community section? ~~Shiri —  Talk~~ 17:58, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
I know a bit about the Turkish version.... --193.140.194.104 06:31, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other languages

message: It exists an ogame novel but it is in german. You can find it also in the german article bout ogame. But I am not sure if it's so important for the english article. --134.147.115.45 17:23, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There is also now a picture of the novel. U can find it here. --134.147.116.209 09:55, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ogame Novel

message: Please be carefull a guy had written here complete nonsens. I had rechange it. But please take a look. Thx --134.147.73.118 18:52, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit War 

message: There is no "Balkan Language"...
The "Balkan Countries" have their own languages (Turkish, Greek, Romanian, Bulgarian, Albanian, etc.
Thanx
* Actually, it should probably say "Bosnian" language. According to http://www.immigration-usa.com/country_digraphs.html .ba is code for Bosnia and Hercegovina. 212.200.52.11 10:00, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balkan language, Forums, etc. 

message: what are the copyrights of ogame? is it open source? can clones be made? where can i find htis info?
It's not an open source. <_< It's a GameForge game, so ask the administators of the game for the info. Da Dohboy 12:43, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Its copyrighted... This means you cannot use any images, website code, or any other applicable copyrighted material.. ANYWHERE. Clones get shut down very fast by the legal team. So do websites caught using copyrighted material. See it all the time lol Anubis1055 01:19, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyrights of ogame? 

message: I think there are a bit too many links.. could someone please short it? especially the different languages which are also available on the website are unneccessary
Done. I was finding that pretty annoying also. This is the English version of the Ogame page. Links to all the different languages is redundant to those pages.
The links are needed as ogame.org is not just for english users its for International users. Whereas the other ogames are only for their given contry.I dont think there are two many links in it either...if you want to see a shitload of links go to the ogame fourm in the Tools and Sims section.
:why were ALL of the links deleted?  The OGame wiki was relevant. --JD79 02:09, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  external links 

message: Please post here everything we can use to prove notability of OGame since somebody thinks its not notable.
Here's some alexa ratings:
: .org - 8.499
: .de - 7.947
: .fr - 12.677
: .com.es - 3.732
: .pl - 7.779
: .com.tr - 3.966
This should show that ogame is pretty big, esp. since its multilingual.
Found some stuff on Google Scholar, but not everything is english: Google Scholar search
Anything else? Shinhan 21:11, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Those aren't great Alexa ratings... --InShaneee 18:37, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They are for a browser-based game. I'd go so far as to say that Ogame is probably one of the top-ranked browser-based games on Alexa, if not the highest ranked (aside from Runescape.) This utility is an Ogame combat simulator; it's #80 on Sourceforge overall and has almost 2.5 million downloads. That would be impossible to achieve if the game weren't notable in some way. (Or if somebody downloaded the program a few million times for no apparent reason.) syphonbyte (t|c) 02:53, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: The screencaps in the article are dated. OGame recently changed to better-looking images. Could someone with a decent amount of planets provide a new screen cap to reflect the changes? I would, but I only have one colony, and fear I would not do justice.NME 07:34, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New screencaps? 

message: I have just merged the Intergalactic Research Network article into the buildings section of the OGame article. As I am unfamiliar with the game, does anyone know of a better section for it? Or is it ok?
Garydh 08:36, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted the Intergalactic Research Network portion in buildings.  IGN (as it is commonly abbreviated) is a research (an upgrade).  A section that may be neccesary to add to this article.68.70.149.142 11:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I, for one, don't understand why you deleted that paragraph. It's listed in the game under "Buildings." I don't see the point in not having it in the "Buildings section of the article. -- Ben 15:21, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because IGN has little to do with buildings. 68.70.149.142 14:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you please re-include the material somewhere in the article? It defeats the purpose of the merge if it is deleted from the article. -- Ben 15:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The best solution would be to create a seperate section for researches. I'll go create it.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.70.149.142 (talk) 03:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Merge 

message: It appears that McGeddon wishes to follow me here from Starships! (a little creepy, I know), so I'll be moving on to a different game and work on sourcing there. This will either have the effect of ridding me of this editor, or ridding you guys of him. Either way it's a good deal for somebody. McGeddon, please don't follow me again. Matt Brennen 18:30, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello. I only chanced across this article because you were attempting to cite the Spanish social-bookmarking entry for it as a source for Starships. Please try to assume good faith. --McGeddon 20:29, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  You two should work together you seem to have a shared interest in this subject. It may even be worth starting a project thingy to try and save those not already deleted Bjrobinson 09:43, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Be easier just to join this one really. DarkSaber2k 09:45, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving On

message: A notable web site review...
GameFAQ's
--Armanalp 06:36, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The key phrases there are "Reader Reviews" and "You can submit your own review for this game using our Review Submission Form". Wikipedia requires reliable sources for its articles: reliable sources are credible published materials with a reliable publication process; their authors are generally regarded as trustworthy, or are authoritative in relation to the subject at hand. --McGeddon 09:37, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ntoablility proof 

message: :Image:Ogame.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ogame.JPG

message: I've read all the article and found no reason for deletion except a possible speculation about the reason why some players are banned. I've made a small change on that part of the article. Some players on ogame.pt have complained about being banned because they've become a threat to other players, without giving proper explanations or facts about it, though.
Hyperdanny 03:19, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you think that you can add something meaningful to the AfD discussion, please feel free to speak up over there. Posting here might be spitting in the wind. But your comment here doesn't really indicate that you are prepared to address the concern over whether or not the subject meets the criteria outlined by WP:WEB. -- Ben 05:51, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No aparent reason for deletion 

message: Does this article really need to list out all the missions and researches? I think it's gratuitous. I think it's one big step towards making the article a game guide. Any thoughts? -- Ben 05:11, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I would say so for the fact that this is about the game.  These are relative to the game part of it. You use these just as you would any other part.  Jason 17:27, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Full details probably arnt needed. This seems to be more of a "what is ogame and what does it do?" kind of page. just how i see it
Anubis1055 15:26, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is good as it is now, althrough we don't need the costs of defenses and ships in Wikipedia. But the details on every ship is ok, they do have weapon lists in first-person-shooter articles, why wouldn't strategy games have lists too? Nyme 18:21, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a game guide 

message: Please help me fill in the rationale for fair image use, the images were obtained from the homepage of ogame.org and is entitled for free user viewing.Yulu 16:38, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Free user viewing? not sure i follow. are you asking if its ok to use them on your site? if so then you must get permission from gameforge as all material on any ogame site is copyrighted. if you dont get permission you risk a lawsuit. Anubis1055 21:23, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: i dont know them all so if you know of an ogame site (ogame.de, ogame.fr) etc. then plz add it to the article with a note as to what language it is. <3 66.169.101.151 17:49, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other ogame sites 

message: I have removed excessive external links to OGame websites in different languages as per WP:EXTERNAL. If you think this was unhelpful (and you have a reason), feel free to revert. Joshua Issac 21:13, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: replaced links as allowed WP:EXTERNAL. if you were going to troll wikipedia then you could have done that instead of blanking the entire section. took me an hour to find all the sites...Anubis1055 00:45, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: Sorry for my last edit. I messed up some things, but i've noticed that everything is in place again.
Adding link to references -> site with the complete list of the servers
--82.106.116.216 15:52, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Servers List 

message: as the subject says... this is NOT a game guide.. this is a what is ogame and what does it do page. lets refrain from turning this into a user manual please...Anubis1055 (talk) 19:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOT A GAME GUIDE 

message: and this includes overzealous mods... if you are going to edit this page edit it ONLY if you know what it is. do not be an asshat and troll wikipedia... Anubis1055 (talk) 18:32, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Trolls 

message: I recently added Ogameblog as a link to the tools page. Anubis then decided to delete it. I can't imagine why, as it is a valuable tool. So, shouldn't it of stayed up? Wikipedia is here to support factual information presented to the user, it is not to have only one side of Ogame shown.
MatCauthon (talk) 13:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The site contains a cheats section which has LONG lists of proxies, bots and other programs considered illegal in OGame rules. Yes, the site claims "Whether there is a point in using cheats is not for me to decide. I only inform the OGame community of them". Think about how many people who use them use them for, say, recognizing other cheaters? Not many. Listing these cheating programs does more harm than good for OGame. The OGameWinner edit war's (solved now) reason was that the side had one proxy. OGameBlog seems to have a LIST of proxies (not to mention the list of bots), which is even more blatant. Sorry, but the site doesn't exist in Wikipedia if the cheats section isn't removed. Nyme (talk) 16:34, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There are several reasons why i removed it. i left a note on your IP Addresses talk page as you wernt logged in. ill start from the top. Cheats. redundant i know... harms the community. Proxies. an issue well understood by the administrators of wikipedia (got one of them involved on the last dispute). the editor removed the proxy and his site has been allowed to remain. slander. i could quote a few things but im sure you already are aware of the lies your site has on it. the site is blatantly offencive and insulting. this is a what is ogame and what does it do page. this is not a page where you can post slanderous websites up and get away with it... do i need to call a wiki admin again? please stop.Anubis1055 (talk) 17:19, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

text: It was another user who undid Anubis' edit. On why he said "your site" is because of the former edit war I spoke of earlier (there the author of the site was adding it here, and I too thought you were the owner of the site). But about the site again... there are no "lies" for what I saw when I looked through the site. There you are right. But why do you call us biased? Because we remove a site that conflicts with the rules of the game it is about? Do you call the government biased when they punish people for their crimes? By all means, ask an admin but you are not going to get anywhere. Nyme (talk) 09:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Right, they don't own Wikipedia. Exactly, it is here to present a neutral point of view. But providing this kind of information for the masses is somewhat like writing 'OGame is a game where one can cheat with minimal risk of getting caught. Here are some links to bots, proxies and everything you need to play unfair.' It's somewhat like promoting cheating. This is what I feel, of course it isn't the only true opinion. I haven't completely read through all Wikipedia policies and guidelines, but actually, if you look at any other "cheating in video games" article (for example, aimbot article), are there any links? Nyme (talk) 17:58, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ogame Blog

message: Several external links were removed from the article as per the WP:EL guidelines and unanimous agreement on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Listing every official site of every country in the world in External links. The two reviews are still listed but should eventually be removed from the External links section and be used (if necessary) as references instead. Megata Sanshiro (talk) 16:10, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: put external links into its own section.
1) please use the sandbox before you edit to make sure you know what you are putting on the page please
2) unanimous agreement on another wiki page is not the ogame page. sorry... but no. economicsguy edited the links back in a few months ago. wiki admin puts them back in then its permitted.
3) thank you for making the discussion on this page. however when doing a discussion on a users talk page its common practice to leave the person who made a comment on your page a message on theirs so they know to check for a response.64.183.198.42 (talk) 01:43, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do not add all those inapproriate links again.  They plainly violate the encyclopedia's external links guideline and will just be removed. This page is subject to both external links guideline and consistency with other games articles.  It is not special.  No consensus exists anywhere for such a long list of repetitive links. To the contrary wikipedia is not a link farm. That is encyclopedia policy. 2005 (talk) 02:09, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And to add to what 2005 said, one Wikipedia admin making an edit does not override Wikipedia guidelines that were created by community consensus. NeoChaosX  (talk, walk) 03:30, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And for that matter, User:EconomicsGuy isn't even an administrator to begin with. NeoChaosX  (talk, walk) 01:53, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  wasnt economics guy. if you look farther you will see it. Anubis1055 (talk) 15:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Heya Anubis, doesnt really matter. Admins cant really over-ride guidelines without a good(and specified) reason. John.n-IRL 15:34, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

text: FINALLY! i cant believe it took ALL THAT WORK to get them to protect this article... bloody hell... thanks for the help guys. Anubis1055 (talk) 04:41, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: Refs: Page has 4 sources. The first one is a site which appears to fail wp:rs, 2 more in German, which is not the issue but both are used for one sentence. The final one is a primary source which is used once. Please fix this, or much of this article may be deleted. John.n-IRL 22:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not appropriate to add a "no" references tag when in fact there are references.  Bad references should be dealt with, and a refimprove tag can be used.  But "no" means "zero".  It sould not be used for other purposes. 2005 (talk) 03:07, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done John.n-IRL 03:21, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Exactly where does the article still need references? I see that account numbers are already referenced. I can't think why information like game resources and technical aspects should be referenced. Nyme (talk) 09:06, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course it needs a reference, go look at featured articles, such as Halo 3, the gameplay section would be similar to what you describe and this of full of references. For an article of this length to have so few resources is a bit ridiculous. Also, anyone who is familiar with this article, why is there so little real world information in the article? This is all in-universe information. John.n-IRL 15:09, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright. It's pretty hard to find references outside the game or its official forums. The forums, however, are the main channel between Gameforge and the players and is used for informing. I recently used the rules thread as a reference, but I don't know if this is advised. I didn't really find any guideline which advises against this (or perhaps I didn't look for it hard enough). And if it can't be done, it will be hard to reference the article better. Nyme (talk) 17:18, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is, if you cant find a reference outside of a forum, then its an indicator that perhaps its not suitable for the article. This article contains a tiny fraction of non-universe info, while the "gameplay" section takes up the rest. Alot of what this article contains would be more suitable to an ogame-wiki. John.n-IRL 09:01, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for the tag(Refs) 

message: To make you aware, all the images in this article are missing Fair Use Rationales, they each require one for this page. John.n-IRL 02:08, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I provided the rationales. It's been for some time but didn't remember to tell it here. Nyme (talk) 06:17, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images - Fair Use 

message: i spend about 2 months trying to draw attention to this article with so many links at the bottom of the page and then do all that work to piss people off to get the page protected and now its unprotected again? i guess its safe to say... "welcome back editors who wish to edit in obscene and cheat related sites". freaking BS... Anubis1055 (talk) 18:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We'll see if the situation gets worse. Perhaps the vandals have left the article. Now when there are almost no links to 3rd party sites, they won't perhaps add their sites because there is no place for them. Nyme (talk) 06:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: that may be gone but problems still remain. for example. this bit of vandalism that was just recently reverted. it continues... should have been permanently protected....Anubis1055 (talk) 16:36, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You were right. The link spam began again. It should be permanently protected. Nyme (talk) 08:23, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  protection removed? 

message: as seen here and in many other articles it is entirely appropriate to leave the game creators link in the external area. please stop removing. this was also confirmed on another talk page that you were a part of.Anubis1055 (talk) 18:32, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  continuing removal of gameforge link 

message: Categories: Stub-Class video game articles | Low-priority video game articles | WikiProject Video games articles
Ogame is by definition a Text Based Browser Game. Not a video game. Why are these categories listed?Anubis1055 (talk) 01:26, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  not a video game 

message: I have nominated this article for deletion, discussion can be found here. (Sorry for the many...many mistakes in the edit field, more tired than i thought). John.n-IRL 22:24, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Nomination for Deletion 

message: I think GameForge deserves a page. I don't know enough about the company to write an article about it, but someone should. Luckytoilet (talk) 03:40, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A GameForge Page? 

message: Alright, now that the deletion debate has passed, we can focus on modifying the article. It was agreed that it should be stripped down to what can be referenced from the existing sources. The most obvious person for making the chances would be a german, but since it may not be available, we must talk about what shall be reserved and what shall be removed. I'd say we keep the header, rules, refs and external link sections. Then we can delete the rest. However, we should make a short gameplay section with a mention on interface and the general idea. Nyme (talk) 12:47, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Rules should probably go under gameplay with only a brief mention, try to have only two or three paragraphs on gameplay/rules. John.n-IRL 14:41, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is too game-guide-esque. Most sections can be summarised by a short paragraph. Details on how the player can obtain each resource should be deleted, detailed percentages and maths regarding game mechanics should go, sections such as the Fodder section should be outright deleted, to name but a few examples. This article also requires some out-of-game information, (development, critical reception, etc). The prose is also fairly weak in places: use of second person "you" (e.g. "your fleet") should be removed, where lists contain encyclopedic information they should be converted to paragraphed prose, stuff like that. Una LagunaTalk 15:22, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: shoulda seen this page about 6 months ago. it literally was a game guide. 3 or 4 of us worked to reword it and remove the guide part (mostly)Anubis1055 (talk) 20:05, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

text: I'm familiar with the game. I'll make the changes. Someone can then revise the article. Nyme (talk) 11:18, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The future of the article 

message: please cite.
"OGame is a text-based, resource-management and space-war themed online browser game. an updated version of the classic MMO game Galaxy II,"
ogame is copyrighted to gameforge google has no reference to a galaxy ii game. google search  76.233.100.17 (talk) 19:34, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Galaxy II 

message: The reference published on heise.de was removed in this edit, with the summary "Can't use heise.de article, as it is either referencing Wikipedia or is a copy of a Wikipedia article". The article is neither referencing Wikipedia, nor is it a copy of a Wikipedia article. The section is just a list of URLs where the reader can read more about the subjects in bold. For example, http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/MMOG for MMOGand http://www.ogame.de  for OGame. If you still think the reference should not be added back, please state why not. --Joshua Issac (talk) 17:49, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Use Google Translate for translating the article and the links if you do not believe me. --Joshua Issac (talk) 17:57, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If there is no objection, then I am re-inserting the citation. --Joshua Issac (talk) 23:02, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  heise.de 

message: Neither of the two articles cited corroborate the fact for which they indicated. Neither article mentions BioWare let alone indicates their involvement in production and development - please also note this GamingBol article the CEO of BioWare does not indicate any relationship between OGame, GameForge, EA or BioWare-Mythic. Further, a search of EA's, BioWare's, OGame's and GameForge's websites does not indicate any relationship. If the statement regarding BioWare's relationship is to be made it should at least be corroborated and preferably include official press releases from at least one of the relevant corporations. Quadrifrons (talk) 21:04, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  BioWare 

message: https://itunes.apple.com/en/app/ogame/id553453991?mt=8  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.173.27.236 (talk) 14:05, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ogame is also on iPad 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on OGame. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060714104155/http://www.labusinessjournal.org/article-46-ogame.html to http://www.labusinessjournal.org/article-46-ogame.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.br-online.de/wissen-bildung/artikel/0603/25-computer-games/index.xml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120427043715/http://board.ogame.org/board703-miscellaneous/board156-archive-version-2-0/board705-help-questions-archive/board631-faq-s-guides/167079-how-a-fight-works/ to http://board.ogame.org/board703-miscellaneous/board156-archive-version-2-0/board705-help-questions-archive/board631-faq-s-guides/167079-how-a-fight-works/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:40, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified