lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Golden Age of Comic Books

message: Right now the Timely Comics group of characters is not showing up on this template, because the  template only allows for 20 groups, and Timely is group number 21. However, the  template can apparently be nested, to get an unlimited number of groups/lists. Could someone who understands template code better than me please modify this template, so that all of the information can be shown? Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 03:27, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Timely Comics

message: I am surprised there isn't a Silver Age counterpart to this template.--82.35.251.109 (talk) 10:31, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silver Age? 

message: Jumpa redirects to Wonder Woman.  I'm not familiar with Jumpa.  Is this vandalism?  There is no mention of Jumpa in the Wonder Woman article. --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 22:12, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Jumpa

message: Add Solomon Grundy! 2804:7F2:5A7:65FF:3137:449B:E4CB:461F (talk) 21:18, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: same as below small jars tc 23:24, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 February 2023 

message: Add Solomon Grundy in All-American Publications! 2804:7F2:5A7:65FF:3137:449B:E4CB:461F (talk) 21:34, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like this list is just for heros, but it doesn't seem to be explicitly stated anywhere ... GiovanniSidwell (talk) 23:23, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 February 2023 (2) 

message: Add Claw (Lev Gleason Publications) to characters under Lev Gleason Publications. JoeCoffee37 (talk) 12:49, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:06, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 June 2023
Talk:Don McLeod

message: McLeod's NHL.com and hockey-reference profiles incorrectly list him as being drafted by the Penguins in 1973. A center with the same name born in 1953 - who doesn't meet current notability requirements - was the player drafted by the Penguins. --151.213.55.42 (talk) 18:30, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the Penguins draft pick
Talk:Battle of the City of Legion

message: Caerleon is about 5 miles from the coast whereas Chester is about 9 miles from the coast. However, I am unsure why the proximity to the coast is seen as being relevant. My understanding is that the reference to the battle is translated as "the ninth battle was at the City of Legion, which the Britons call Cair Lion" with no mention of being near the coast Tonyddyer (talk) 10:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caerleon not on the coast?
Talk:Battle of Kushtia

message: The Bharat Rakshak page links it for Pakistani perspective, besides your content is blatant violation of WP:NPOV with words such as "disaster" and one sided. Lets discuss the content you want to add here on talk first. so as to make sure that the facts are reliably sourced and it follows WP:NPOV--DBigXrayᗙ 21:21, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  December war
Talk:Tasmanian Globster

message: If it was discovered to be a whale, why is there the word "unidentified" at the beggining?
Because they didn't find it and say, "oh look, a whale"... they found it and said "what the heck IS this?!"  The word "unidentified" simply means that they didn't know what it was AT FIRST, and it took a while to figure it out. 12.31.187.178 (talk) 22:20, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Regulator–Moderator War

message: Interesting history.  I think more can be said, but specific histories of this episode are rare and uncommon.  I've listed a couple in the history section for future reference. Deatonjr (talk) 18:34, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have heard that this was the largest blood feud in American history. It also directly involved Sam Houston, so I think it deserves some more attention. It was a major issue during his presidency. Theseus1776 (talk) 23:50, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

text: It also deserves some kind of explanation, somewhere somehow, of what "Regulators" and "Moderators" actually means, rather than seemingly assuming the reader magically knows. "Regulating" what? "Moderating" what? 192.34.130.214 (talk) 23:12, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ordinal linguistic personification

message: I think i have this because:
1-boy
2-boy
3-girl
4-boy
5-boy
6-boy
7-girl
8-Girl
9-boy
1 and 2 are brothers. 3 and 5 fight. 7 and 8 are sisters that love each other.
~i have this types of synesthesia and my friend has a different type. For me, 1 is a boasting boy with high expectations from the other numbers, but never gets them.  2 is a kind, thoughtful boy who is probably my favorite. 3 is a tomboy and a daredevil. 4 is a middle aged woman who is like a youger grandma to everybody. 5 is a bully who likes to pick on all the numbers, but especially 2. 6 is also a bully and sides with 5, but is stupid and does the dirty work while 5 thinks of plans.  7 is a girl, and very vague to me. 8 is a girl that speaks for herself in times of need, but other wise sides with 3. 9 is a boy and is quiet all the time. 0 is a loner boy. Letters also have genders and personalities for me, but they are more vague than numbers.99.51.180.26 (talk)Margaret :D
1, 2 and 3 are babies.  4 is quite sensible. 5 is always laughing.  6 is a kind woman, very homely.  7 is an unfriendly snob.  8 is an old man.  9 is an authoritarian and strict person.
I assume different people have it differently; for me 1 is a stern middle-aged man, 2 is a sad (maybe a little stern) middle-aged woman, 3 is a man in his early 30's who likes to get into dirty business, 4 is a young lady who is quite to herself, 5 is an extroverted young man considered cool, 6 is a slightly older man who is a little mean, 7 is a young metrosexual male, 8 is an older lady who has an easy-going attitude and 9 is an older and more sophisticated lady who has reached the retirement age but continues leading a very busy life.Abc85 22:36, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mine 

message: The final paragraph is written in a casual style, including emoticons and a colloquial term (“is baby” instead of “is a baby”. It also does not cite a source, and with further research there is no scholar under the name Frankie Reyna publishing research on this topic. 71.5.108.21 (talk) 17:27, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concern with experiences and reports section
Talk:Operation Model 5

message: Any objections to moving this to Operation Model 5? I believe the English name is more appropriate. However, if someone opposes using the English name in principle, the second best would be Operation Dugman 5 per WP:HE. —Ynhockey (Talk) 21:34, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Operation Dugman" is fine, but I really dislike the name "Operation Model 5". "Model" is too generic, it has too many meanings, unlike the Hebrew counterpart. No one's ever going to guess what type of model "Doogman" refers to. Besides, most literature refers to the event as "Doogman" or "Dugman" anyway. Poliocretes (talk) 00:18, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Erm, I moved the article but forgot that this discussion ever took place. Feel free to move back if you wish, but we should revisit the discussion—I believe that the name Doogman 5 is meaningless to English-speakers, so it shouldn't be used as a title. In the article itself, we can list the Hebrew name anyway. However, if in most literature the Hebrew name is used, then we should use it. However, I prefer Dugman over Doogman. —Ynhockey (Talk) 14:17, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I still prefer the Hebrew Dugman, but "Model" will do.  Poliocretes (talk) 20:33, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: The article currently states that 5 of the two seat F-4 Phantom aircraft were lost and another was damaged but returned to Ramat David, while there were 2 KIA and 9 POW.  Was one of the KIA in the damaged aircraft? -- 119.31.121.88 (talk) 22:04, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: 6 aircraft were lost, article corrected. Poliocretes (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualties
Talk:Tug of war at the Summer Olympics

message: "Sweden was also among the top countries with three medals." I only see Sweden twice in the chart? --Golbez 17:01, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Denmark and Sweden each had three men on the six-man team that won the gold in 1900.  -- Jonel | Speak 22:00, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, that was a quick response. Thanks! :) --Golbez 22:11, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Does anyone know why this event was discontinued? Rigadoun  (talk) 01:35, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was obviously too awesome for mere humans to behold. --130.76.32.15 (talk) 19:25, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Too many wins by teams local to the competition site, I would guess... AnonMoos (talk) 19:05, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The article really needs to explain why it was discontinued.  Half the events today have nothing to do with the Olympic motto of "Faster, Higher, Stronger", but this epitomized it. 98.82.24.210 (talk) 01:21, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Had that been the reason, it could have easily been remedied by restricting each country to one team, similar to what's done with soccer. 98.218.229.58 (talk) 18:30, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason discontinued? 

message: Does anyone know the line up for the London Met Semi Finals? My Great Grandfather [Albert Edward Thornhill] was, I believe one of the contestants.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.87.196 (talk) 20:22, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: question

message: The flag of South Africa is very anachronistic... AnonMoos (talk) 19:05, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed it was, but I've fixed that now.  Thanks for the heads-up!  —  fourthords | =Λ= |  21:29, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag in table

message: Can someone please explain this competition--I mean, these competitions--in more detail. 
* What is a "club"?
* What competitions occurred?
* How many competitions occurred?
* Are there multiple competitions by, say, weight class?
** Weight of individual competitors or weight of the combined team (or club)? 
* What is a "mixed team"?
--CmdrDan (talk) 05:45, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: More details please
Talk:Architecture of Penang

message: What happened to Malay part? Surely there are many houses representing this style. Islamic architecture is not the same as Malay. Malay vernacular architecture can be found in most villages in the state.Most of Malay were Islam,Malay are culture while Islam is religion. Please improve this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.48.162.157 (talk) 02:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malay Architecture in Penang? 

message: It seems this article is about some English colonial and Chinese architecture. Isn't Penang in Malaysia? So what happened to Malay and Islamic architecture???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.129.20.9 (talk) 07:06, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this article about Penang Malaysia or Hong Kong? 
Talk:Hakka walled village

message: this article describes only hakka structures known as fuijan tulous and no other type of walled hakka-culture city. if there are no other types of walled hakka structures then the article  that already exists separately about fuijan tulous should suffice (esp. since, it is far more developed and at a higher wiki standard than this article). This article seems redudant and misleading.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.141.115.176 (talk) 04:30, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge with Fujian_Tulou 
Category talk:United States battle stubs

message: I have added military operations in addition to battles as items that should be listed here. --- Skapur 21:55, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reverted this change. WP:WSS manages stub templates, and we try pretty hard to keep a consistent look for related templates. We have many "battle" templates, and this name is simply used since it is short to write. In this context, "battle" covers both actual "battles" as well as "actions" and "operations". If you seek a general rewording of the these templates, please take the matter up with WP:WSS first. If people agree there, all related templates should be changed, not only one. But please take the matter up with WP:WSS first. Thanks in advance. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 22:13, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Arab–Khazar wars

message: User:Cplakidas moved the page Khazar–Arab Wars to Arab–Khazar Wars on 15 October 2012 stating: by far the preferred form, especially in the more relevant bibliography (Brook, Mako, etc). 
Google web hits are far greater for Khazar–Arab Wars than Arab–Khazar Wars (67,900 cf. 9,110).  However, the result on Google books is the other way round, 223 cf. 72.  
"Brook" refers to 
I am therefore completing the renaming done by User:Cplakidas by changing remaining mentions within this article and in the page Khazars. – Fayenatic London 20:03, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Google web hits are not a reliable indicator, as there is a great number of Wikipedia clones out there, which would naturally reflect the former name. Constantine   ✍  20:45, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: In the section "First Arab–Khazar War and aftermath" there is the double link Caucasian Albania/Arran. I think we should pick one. It is fair to tell the reader that (Caucasian) Albania is also called Arran (and is basically modern Azerbaijan)... but how is the average reader to know which internal link to click to learn more? I am not sure which one, but I would probably go with Caucasian Albania, since that article is about the politics of the region in the period in question, while Arran (Caucasus) is a broader article. Srnec (talk) 19:50, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albania 

message: Hi ! Could you please add some reliably sourced information about Aguk Shagin to the main body of the article before adding him to the infobox? In any case, we need a source to verify this (if must be in the infobox, though that would be far from ideal). I will revert your edit in the mean time. Thanks! ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 16:27, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked up two of the sources that I could get access to, and one doesn't mention him at all (the page number given is the bibliography index) and the other just mentions his existence, without any of the details given here. Neither Dunlop nor Artamonov, in their quite detailed examination of the conflict, mention him. As things stand, his existence is quite dubious. Constantine   ✍  13:22, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Aguk Shagin]] 

message: Uploaded this coin yesterday, thought you might be interested :-) - LouisAragon (talk) 00:38, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks , added it to the article :) Constantine   ✍  12:21, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coin
Talk:Battle of Cádiz (1669)

message: User:Newsailormon and I are currently talking at that user's talk page about recent edits re: the provenance of the painting in the article, so I've walked back a few of the edits while we figure things out. I suspect we will eventually revise the article to state that the painting is by Monamy, since this is what more recent sources say (our sources which attribute it to either van de Velde are older and new information seems to have surfaced); however, the idea that the painting was modeled after the mezzotint is highly questionable at the least and I'd like to see the source for it, and it would also be nice to see if Michael S. Robinson, the source that Newsailormon has added, addresses the question of Kirkall's (the mezzotint artist's) attributing the painting he copied to van de Velde, because that seems useful information. Also, it would be interesting to find out how it was discovered that the painting was the work of Monamy (eg. were new techniques used to discover a signature that had previously been hidden?), though I admit that that may be too much detail for an article on a battle - the same way that the old GA review found that we need to cover the diplomatic expedition, but that there's too much on it to cover in this article! –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:43, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Having given it some more thought - it may be desirable to create an article on Morgan Kempthorne's battle. I imagine the RS coverage of it must exist, and that would allow us to divert the discussion of the provenance to that article since, after all, it is pretty well recognized by now not to depict the battle that is the subject of this article. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:47, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Provenance of painting
Talk:Battle of Mang Yang Pass

message: *GM100 (operation eglantine)
*GM100 (an khe ambush) w/map
Cliché Online 01:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: reliable sources
Talk:Second Battle of Porto

message: Is this one page about both the french conquest (march 28) and the british reconquest (may 12), or is there some other page about the other one?  The Gomm 02:03, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Both battles? 

message: The French general Franceschi, present at this battle is Jean-Baptiste Franceschi (or Francesqui), not Michel. You can see it at French Wikipedia as "Jean-Baptiste Francesqui" - User: 83 165 52 148 (Montes), 6 October 2007, 18:29  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.165.56.67 (talk) 16:23, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who Franceschi ?
Talk:Blockade of Callao

message: Bobmardment is not a property tittle, because it was a blockade, to avoid confusions please change it to Callao Blockade or something similar Rasdar2 (talk) 14:10, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Teh tennisman

message: Username	Teh tennisman
Total edits	343
Distinct pages edited	113
Average edits/page	3.035
First edit	03:18, 14 May 2006
	
(main)	120
Talk	22
User	82
User talk	67
Wikipedia	36
Wikipedia talk	16
Nishkid64 17:15, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

message: i am removing my request
Teh tennisman 17:17, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  im removing this
Talk:Staff of Hermes

message: The Staff (or Karykeion) of Hermes (Greek Mythology) and the Caduceus of Mercury are related. They are symbols of commerce and incantations. Neither have been traditionally aligned with medicine. The Staff of Asclepius with its rough-hewn staff and single snake is traditionally the medical symbol and probably comes from the practice to get rid of worms under the skin. A slit would be cut in front of the worm's path and as it emerged it was wound round a stick until removed. This frequently required service was advertised by a sign bearing the snake and the staff. The caduceus or staff of hermes only became associated with medicine after the Hermetic Order.
Mark Fuller 17:16, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, Mark (nearly 4 years later). I'm working on Guinea worm disease and also interested in the way that a snake or two around a rod came to symbolize medicine (at least in the USA, which is my country). --Uncle Ed (talk) 15:21, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Pursey

message: Username	Pursey
Total edits	300
Distinct pages edited	180
Average edits/page	1.667
First edit	13:00, 9 October 2006
	
(main)	108
Talk	19
User	12
User talk	139
Wikipedia	22
Nishkid64 17:16, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Bellows

message: The article should read more like a list of terms with appropriate definitions/descriptions. Maybe it should be dab page.BiblbroksTalk2me 17:32, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a myth among all bellowers (owners of bellows) that there is one man among the many who stands heads and shoulders high above all other bellowers and he is know as Lord of the Bellows. He has rights over all of the bellows and all other bellowers lawfully must obey his every bellows-related command and fulfill his every bellows-related desire wholly and truly.
No one knows his location nor his appearance. All that is known is that he possesses great powers far beyond human equality and that his name is Tom Markwell. His only known accomplice goes by the name of Lucy Brice. She claimed to have been connected with him. However, it was soon uncovered that she had past records of mental illness and her claims were ignored. However, to the bellowers, she represents the truth of the mighty one and is praised as a disciple of Tom Markwell. She is worshiped and raised above man as a god-like figure on the right hand of Tom Markwell. Her location is currently unknown.
Wakablogger2 (talk) 02:28, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lord of the Bellows 
Talk:Leopard Cat FC

message: I think that this topic should be renamed "Tatung Football Club," since "Tatung Club" doesn't really specify a sport.
→I don't know the club's actual name, but I used the name listed on the AFC's website.  If the club has Football in its name, I agree the article name should be changed. Jogurney 14:58, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it's "Tatung Club" on the AFC website, keep it at "Tatung Club," then. - Asdf1248 15:23, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename?
Talk:W. Lucy & Co.

message: Does the website work for any other people? I get an Access Denied message. Anyone else have this problem? Segafreak2 17:53, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Website

message: There are several web pages on Lucy boxes in Wolverhampton, UK - eg  and  - which is a discussion. Should these be included on the page? Jackiespeel (talk) 19:24, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wolverhampton Lucy boxes
File talk:Rossendaleunitedfc.jpg

message: I have changed the licensing logo of this image to a more accurate tag. The  more clearly defines the genre of this image than just the tag . This also improves the categorization of this image considerably as there are amny different types of logos relating to different fields of encyclopedic content. The category of this image is further classified as belonging to :Category:Football logos. --Siva1979Talk to me 17:58, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for change
Talk:Constitution of New Jersey/to do

message: *Find why the constitution was rewritten twice. 
*Suggest solutions to citing sources other than the current way in this article: a few times every section and on important issues. 
*Look for important verdicts affecting the constitution, such as gay marriage or eminent domain. 
*Look for archaic elements of the old constitution that are noteworthy. Eg: anything about slavery mentioned in any Pre-Civil War versions of the constitution, dueling.
:Looked. Can't find any, probably because it was revised in 1943. Drop a line if you find anything like that. Evan(Salad dressing is the milk of the infidel!) 19:04, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
MediaWiki talk:Category header

message: What is the purpose of naming this element? —Centrx→talk • 18:02, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know, but I presume for either hiding purposes, or addressing it via user scripts.  It doesn't do any harm, does it? JesseW, the juggling janitor 19:21, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming element

message: This template caused problems due to a software bug on 5&6 Feb 2015. More details at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 134#Visible markup on category pages. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:11, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at VPT
Talk:John Kelvin Koelsch

message: Although Koelsch served in the United States Navy during the World War II era, no reliable sources found as of yet state that he served overseas in a war zone during the war. Accordingly, :Category:American naval personnel of World War II and :Category:American World War II bomber pilots was removed from the article. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 13:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: World War II service