lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Abc conjecture

message: Our article currently writes "The abc conjecture originated as the outcome of attempts by Oesterlé and Masser to understand the Szpiro conjecture about elliptic curves", with no mention at that point of the Mason–Stothers theorem, which is mentioned only briefly much later as an "analogue" of the same result. However, the Mason–Stothers theorem came first, and my understanding was that it provided some of the motivation for the formulation of the abc conjecture. For instance, in "Undergraduate Algebra" Lange writes that the formulation of abc involved "evolving from the insights of Mason, Stothers, ... and others", and Baker "A Comprehensive Course in Number Theory" writes "Masser was influenced by a theorem which Mason had obtained". Shouldn't we say something about that connection, a little more prominently? —David Eppstein (talk) 21:12, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection to [[Mason–Stothers theorem]] 

message: This was added "But Mochizuki argued their opinion in his report."  Shouldn't this be "But Mochizuki argued against their opinion in his report"? Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 17:07, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It shouldn't exist at all. XOR'easter (talk) 18:29, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  new addition 

message: This part
"On April 3, 2020, two Japanese mathematicians announced that Mochizuki's claimed proof would be published in Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences (RIMS)"
has to be replaced.
It is now published as a special issue:
https://ems.press/journals/prims/issues/1507  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.248.76.166 (talk) 19:19, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replace 

message: Maniapoto Jackie Newton 122.58.0.183 (talk) 20:16, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maniapoto Jackie Newton 

message: "A number of famous conjectures and theorems in number theory would follow immediately from the abc conjecture or its versions."  Is this correct?  Will conjectures also follow, or only theorems and proofs of conjectures? 2600:6C67:1C00:5F7E:6DF1:CD52:7E5F:D359 (talk) 15:43, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  conjectures 

message: There are other mathematical theorems related to the subject of value that are not mentioned in the entry. Some of them will be able to be proven if the abc-conjecture will proven. And some with other types of relationships. You can find more topics to put into the entry in the category:abc-conjecture .  ינון גלעדי (talk) 22:48, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Please add information to the entry
Talk:Sickness bag

message: I believe that the barf bag is encyclopedic.  This page should be given a chance to expand, not prodded or AfD'd or speedied (it's not a dictdef).  -- Plutor 16:56, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

message: Currently 3 out of 4 paragraphs of the collecting section refer to a promotional campaign by a single airline. Though it probably should be mentioned, isn't it too much?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshXF (talk • contribs) 00:59, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Far too much, agreed. Though it should be noted that a press release is a valid primary source if care is given to avoid OR. See almost any article on a company, for examples. Ideally they should use Template:Cite press release. -- Quiddity (talk) 01:59, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Virgin Atlantic 

message: I feel that the term "barf bag" listed in the first sentence on the article is not encyclopaedic enough ("barf" is slang in most English speaking areas of which I know) and should be removed or moved to another section.
Any disagreements? Theoboyd (talk) 15:26, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative Names
Talk:Anders Matthesen

message: The article is very pro for Anders Matthesen, perhaps it should be a little less pro. Right now it sounds a bit like a fanpage -- Snailwalker | talk 17:14, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah it is much better now, I've fixed some language and stuff but it is quite good now --Snailwalker | talk 20:28, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Fine with me :-) --Snailwalker | talk 22:10, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
Talk:Acoustic resonance

message: "The wavelength that will create the first resonance on the string is equal to twice the length of the string."
Is this correct? The sentence before says that resonant frequencies are directly related to the mass, length, and tension of the string. How can only the length then create the first resonance?
Ecov (talk) 12:20, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vibrating string
Talk:Dayak fruit bat

message: The information at the page "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyacopterus" is a might be original research and appears to conflict to some extent with the information in the Nature paper in the references for this page. If anyone knows more about these fruit bats could they please clear up this issue. Nicolharper 17:22, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sambomaster

message: Anyone know if 性春 is Seishun or Seiharu? I have no idea what it means. Winampman 10:40, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Houkago no Seishun 

message: "They were also asked to do the main theme to the movie Koi no Mon, which became the song Utsukushi Ningen No Hibi."
But... that song isn't on the OST... and if that isn't the main theme of the movie, then which song is it? I have not been able to see the movie yet.
Heres a link to the tracklist. http://www.play-asia.com/paOS-13-71-9y-49-en-70-cnx.html
Winampman 07:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other 

message: Sambomaster are releasing a new album きみのためにつよくなりたい (kimi no tameni tsuyoku naritai). I'm not sure of the exact meaning of this English, I think it means "To be strong for the sake of you", but I'm not 100% as my Japanese is not great. So can somebody add an English translation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.194.64.194 (talk) 12:51, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated album info 

message: This article seems to me to be woefully out of date. Everything seems to stop partway through 2011, which means there’s currently 10 years of history that should be added to the article. It’s odd — I could’ve sworn this article used to include information about the band’s prominence in the anti-nuclear movement in Japan. It seems that information has been removed along the way. Nevertheless, at least updating the discography would be a good place to start if we want to update the article to keep on top of things. Crossark (talk) 08:44, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating info
Talk:Forst (Lausitz)

message: The caption on the picture of the pre-Schengen border crossing stamp says it's for crossing from Forst to Olszyn.  That can't be right.  Directly across the Oder/Odra from Forst is Zasieki.  140.147.236.194 (talk) 21:19, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the image, it's not that important anyway. --32X (talk) 07:01, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caption on border crossing stamp--incorrect?
Talk:Purna Swaraj

message: I suggest that the article be moved to Purna Swaraj as discussed some months back on the talkpage of WP:INWNB. I also believe that it is the riught title. I would have moved it myself, but found that there is a section titled "Purna Swaraj" in this and I did not want to move it, without changing the structure; I am unable to do so as I am in a hurry right now. I'll revisit this in a couple of days. Meanwhile, if someone is game, they may want to have a go for it. Thanks in advance, --Gurubrahma 03:56, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion 

message: Women 103.140.107.226 (talk) 06:37, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Michael Stipe

message: It's hard to believe the name "R.E.M." (rapid eye movement) was picked naively out of a dictionary. The name choice is brilliant; the distinguishing characteristic of the band's song lyrics is that they resemble dream sequences. Medically, REM is the dream part of the sleep cycle. I think most fans are aware of this. 2603:300A:1400:D200:1507:7EE0:4217:FD96 (talk) 08:35, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It is interesting that you bring this up, since there was just a discussion about the initials of R.E.M. on that article's talk page: . You can also read about the band name in R.E.M.'s biography here and on the previous page. Hameltion (talk, contribs) 14:48, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of band 

message: Is he also an actor?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clrichey (talk • contribs) 00:11, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , He's acted a few times but is not known as an actor. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actor?
Talk:Aryan religion

message: Please don't add religions to this list that one is oneself not sure whether they are "Aryan religions" or not. Adding for the sake of "completeness" and then  tagging is counter-productive. -- Fullstop 06:46, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: adding links and simultaneously <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> tagging them

message: Where are the reliable sources that use the term dharmic religions in the context of this article? "Dharmic religions" is a now deleted obscure neologism and should generally not be used throughout Wikipedia. A good alternative is Indian religions.  I propose leaving dharmic religions in brackets, like "Indian religions (sometimes called dharmic religions)" The number of google scholar results for "Indian religions"+"Indian religion" is (45.600 + 84.200) while it is only (492+475) for "dharmic religions" +"dharmic religion". See Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_September_8. Andries 19:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: link removed, was superfluous anyway. -- Fullstop 21:56, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reliable sources for the term dharmic religions?

message: Root of this family is yuddhistir. 2409:4042:4D8E:523E:895C:B3B3:C79F:9C10 (talk) 04:01, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aryan families
Talk:TAC

message: I received this from Scientific American:<BR>
VISION: What Is TAC and How Can It Help You Prevent Cataracts?<BR>
A reader asks, "Are there any foods I can eat to lessen my risk of developing cataracts?"
Here's our advice:
It's best to consume a variety of antioxidant-rich foods, which may provide some protection against age-related cataracts.
A Swedish study published in JAMA Ophthalmology found that combining certain foods enhanced their antioxidant effect. The study used a questionnaire-based nutrition survey of 30,607 women, ages 49 to 83, who were monitored for the development of age-related cataracts for about eight years. The researchers estimated the total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of the women's diets -- a measure of the antioxidant effect achieved by combining certain foods.
The study found that women whose diets had the highest TAC had a 12.8 percent lower risk of developing age-related cataracts compared with women whose diets had a low TAC. The most important contributors to the TAC were fruits and vegetables, whole grains and coffee.
While the evidence for a preventive effect on cataract formation through diet is not strong, there are sound reasons, from an overall health perspective to follow a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, legumes (peas and beans), fish, and lean meats and poultry. A word of caution: Avoid taking antioxidants in single-supplement forms, such as high-dose vitamin C, which may actually increase the risk of age-related cataracts.
-----
I didn't edit this into the Article because it might be either too obscure or merely coined for the occasion by the writer of the above for convenience.  <B>☺</B> Dick Kimball (talk) 14:27, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Meaning 

message: The term isn't restricted to Europe. Also used in Canada. If used world wide, the mention of Europe should be removed. Regards, ... PeterEasthope (talk) 13:03, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total Allowable Catch
Talk:List of counties and unitary districts of England by population density

message: Article needs a complete rewrite - density for each city in their individual articles is different to that in this list.
e.g. portsmouth population according to Portsmouth is 4,683 / km², according to this is 4,668. Makes a big difference with the list, as according to city pages greater london is largest
:Also, why is Greater London not split into its boroughs like the metropolitan counties? 82.5.208.124 (talk) 12:02, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

message: Square mile, square kilometre, square foot? The article does not say. Also, the two tier or unitary status of the counties is not relevant here. It would also be interesting to see the rual population density, by removing the population and areas of the towns. 78.147.146.6 (talk) 11:54, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Density per what?
Talk:Gaya

message: Gaya one of the seven holiest cities of India should have its own space. --Bhadani 17:47, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 05:49, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Emperor Ingyō

message: The Spanish version of  is the 100,000th Wikipedia article written in that language. --Slgrandson 17:48, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Another milestone in another language

message: The Imperial mon (emblem) was added in the Notes section in 2010.  In 2012, the image was removed from this and other articles about Japanese emperors -- compare here. Zenwort's edit summary is clear and reasonable --img of Imperial seal removed, this was not used before the Muromachi era 
The use of this symbol is justified because this article is an important part of a grouping of articles about the emperors of Japan -- see Imperial Household Agency (Kunaichō):  允恭天皇 (19).  Does this rationale provide a good enough reason for it to be restored? --Enkyo2 (talk) 16:50, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Image of Imperial symbol 

message: <ref>Titsingh, Isaac. (1834). Annales des empereurs du japon, p. 26; Brown, Delmer M. (1979).  Gukanshō, pp. 257–268; Varley, H. Paul. (1980). Jinnō Shōtōki, p. 112.
- Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:19, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Extra references (if needed) for the lead
Talk:Escape character

message: This article could really use a few examples of WHAT exactly an escape character would look like in various programming languages. I mean, otherwise it could be difficult for the laymen to understand what exactly is meant here.
Would someone add some code samples please? Mzanime 17:50, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples?

message: The following ought to be added to this article at some point. Derek farn 16:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  @ in C# 

message: The MoS (Wikipedia:Manual of Style (self-references to avoid)#Think about print) explicitly states:
: … so try to use terms such as "this article" as opposed to "this website". 
Why that this article considered to be a banned self-reference? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:06, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "this article" (revision of July 19, 2010 by Jayron32) 

message: Sometimes you wonder whether such entries are intentionally obfuscated. Need it be an incantation?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Breezeclimber (talk • contribs) 04:41, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obfuscated? 

message: 0x7D octet (\175, or ASCII: ) ) ——the 0x7D in ASCII should be "}". Ligand (talk) 17:06, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 0x7D octet

message: Seems a lot of this article (Escape character) is probably more suited to the Escape sequence article. Perhaps the two could even be merged together; I’m not sure. Vadmium (talk, contribs) 10:12, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, move the material on escape sequences to the correct article. No don't merge the articles, they are different concepts. Op47 (talk) 20:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Escape sequence]] 

message: OK, what is the Wikipedia escape character?  I need to write out some things that are normally processed as tags.  Seems like this page should include that. Gah4 (talk) 13:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: There's <nowiki>. See Help:Wiki markup (and Help:NOWIKI in particular). Tea2min (talk) 13:58, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  Should either this page or escape sequences explain this? Gah4 (talk) 14:23, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia escape 

message: When clicking on "German" from this article, the target is Escape (Key) https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escape_(Steuerzeichen) instead of Maskierungszeichen https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maskierungszeichen 134.102.193.253 (talk) 12:13, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to German entry is incorrect
Talk:University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus

message: I have added Business as a subject available for Undergraduate Study at the University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus NB I am an employee of the University of Exeter.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RogerRoger1979 (talk • contribs) 13:21, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Business 

message: This article was merged into Penryn Campus, per discussion on Talk:Penryn Campus.  —SMALLJIM  20:03, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged
Talk:Tracey Adams

message: Millahanna  thank you.  I still can not figure out how to either make a new article or make appropriate changes.  Maybe I will never get it and that would be unfortunate since I have wanted to correct this page since it first appeared. I asked Bart to email me..... I will ask you as well..... [redact]     Seems rediculous to have a bio on someone that doesnt even have their birth date and birth city correct.
This article is filled with incorrect information and needs to be updated and corrected by the subject. (That's me) However my contributions were deleted. Until I am permitted to correct this article it remains inconsistent and incomplete.
:I'm the one who reverted your edits on the article.  I didn't have a problem with the content itself, for the most part.  You just broke a few refs and I couldn't figure out how to fix it while leaving in your changes.  You can see what I mean in the diff of your edit here.  Scroll to the bottom "References" section and not the second reference got screwed up.  As I said in my edit summary, try again?  You'll want to watch out for WP:COI, though.  Perhaps you could provide us with some online or print sources we could use to update the page? I'm sure the people at WP:PORN or WP:LGBT would be happy to help.  I only stumbled across your edits while doing recent changes patrol.  Also, as Bart noted, it is generally considered not good to remove talk page comments that do directly pertain to the article.  Obviously that guy's opinion on the article's lack of significance never went anywhere so there's no harm in leaving it.  I suppose there's no harm in removing it either but archiving is usually a better practice.  Millahnna (mouse)talk 20:50, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: (born June 7, 1959), or June 6, 1958 (age 54)???johncheverly 17:28, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is her correct birthdate???
Talk:Proliferation Security Initiative

message: *Legislation, pushed by prominent members of the House Democratic leadership, including Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Tom Lantos and Armed Services Committee Chairman Ike Skelton, urges "with a particular emphasis" that the president work with the Security Council (where Russia and China, serial proliferators of weapons of mass destruction, have a veto) to "authorize the PSI under international law." 
This would make the PSI ineffective, which I suppose, is the purpose of the proposed legislation: to defang the PSI and promote nuclear proliferation. --Uncle Ed 18:23, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed link to United Nations

message: Does anyone know if this is related to the Bush Administration Non-Proliferation Initiative? I think some material could possibly be merged in here.--69.208.138.130 (talk) 14:23, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That section is now gone from the article; you can find it in older versions, such as this one.  I found only one good citation there, which I've added as an external link, and no text worth bringing across. -- John Broughton   (♫♫) 01:02, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bush Administration Non-Proliferation Initiative  

message: In spite of the anonymous comment above, this article should not be part of the Wiki Obama Project.  It was initiated by President G. W. Bush.  Obama's name doesn't even appear anywhere in the article.  He has done nothing with PSI other than to have inherited it from the previous administration.  There is no mention whatsoever of anything that Obama has done with it other than to mention it in an informal agenda statement.  If this is the standard for inclusion of articles in Wiki projects, then almost every existing policy under every administration would result in the inclusion of all articles related to those policies in every president's Wiki project.
Barring a substantial argument to the contrary, I'll remove the Obama Project tag soon.  (The question is also raised, Why isn't this article part of the G. W. Bush Wiki Project?) Holy (talk) 05:18, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove from Obama Project 

message: This statement... "A large portion of states which have been critical of PSI consider themselves part of the Non-Aligned Movement, which indicates that while nominally claiming objections to the initiative for "legal" reasons, actual hesitation towards endorsement might be more aligned with political considerations, such as not wanting to be seen as supporting United States or "Western" initiatives." ... is surely just a statement of opinion, umless backed by a citation?  Shouldn't this be removed as OR? 86.134.117.81 (talk) 10:06, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion? Non-Aligned Movement
Talk:Abraham Lincoln High School (San Jose, California)

message: We should be removing "But Lincoln's wrestling team is the school's most beloved sport" due to POV, lack of citation, and atrocious grammar. We should also be making various spelling fixes as well, 'league' being a prime example of what needs to be fixed. 68.96.255.13 23:10, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Various cleaning notes
Talk:Age of the Sturlungs

message: I changed two things for the following reasons.
1. A fatality rate of 7 people a year hardly qualifies as Civil War. Hence the change to internal strife.
2. The Sturlungaöld was certainly violent (although surprisingly peaceful compared to other societies at the time), but its reputation as The bloodiest chapter in Icelandic history or words to that effect is probably due to the fact that it is also the best documented until its time and, as it happens, for centuries after. For that period we know fairly precisely who was killed by whom. That does not apply to the centuries before or after.
Cheers  Io 18:20, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The number 7 pr. annum is very well documented. If you count the violent deaths of the saga period or even in the two centuries following the Sturlungöld, you'll find that, after proper deductions due to legends, that the Sturlungaöld was hardly bloodier than other periods. Read Þorgils saga ok Hafliða or Guðmundar saga dýra (both included in Sturlunga saga) for verification. Sturlunga saga is usually considered as very reliable. Its main author took part in the events and is usually regarded as a model of impartiality. And impartial he was, as you will know, if you've read the book. The main reason for the Icelandic surrender in 1262/1264 was probably not the blood toll, but rather the heavy burdens of being drafted at the time of harvest. Therefore they made made one of the conditions of the Old Covenant that the Norwegian king should be responsible for supplying the land with grain. The plain fact is that Iceland surrendered for economical reasons. Society as such, was not more violent than other societies at the time. The difference in popular perception was most likely that Icelanders were more literate than their contemporaries. Cheers Io 20:08, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough ;) -- Palthrow 20:37, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Did I actually succeed in making a point? :) Anyway, history is usually more complex than your usual textbook implies. All the best. Io 20:57, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled