Talk:Il trovatore

message: I noticed that someone edited "Ferrando"'s name and changed to "Fernando" with message "Wrong spelling"? To avoid being edit again and again, I put both names there. It pronounced "Ferrando" and also written as "Ferrando" in the Il trovatore libretto but some articles and opera pronounced it as "Fernando". For reference, please go to Il trovatore Ferrando role I vote for "Ferrando" but it depends on you guys. In the meantime, I just leave it as 2 names
- Jay 07:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ferrando is definitely correct - this is the form of name that appears in all opera reference books and on all recording liner-notes.  It may look like a misprint for Fernando, but it isn't. --GuillaumeTell 00:35, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, it seems like we have to monitor the name from time to time to avoid people from changing it again. Ferrando is definitely correct as written in the libretto. -  Jay 02:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is on my watchlist (I added Template:Verdi operas to the article), which is how I came to see the above, so I'll be able to spot any reversion to Fernando.  But why don't you add it to your watchlist, too. --GuillaumeTell 16:12, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ferrando and Fernando

message: Have reverted re-installian of that section.Viva-Verdi (talk) 02:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Noted arias section in all opera articles will be deleted after the list have been incorporated into synopsis as per Wikipedia:WikiProject Opera/Article styles and formats - Jay (talk) 06:51, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No need for "Noted arias" section when all on the list have been incorporated into the text of the synopsis 

message: This page, at first glance, likes an encyclopedia from the 19th century. We have Netrebko and we don't use her (on top). I do not understand this world. She was and is and will be one of the best Leonoras ever and deserves the top spot. (Heard her twice in Salzburg). On the top of the page I do not want to see anyone else. Please, let's find an agreement, I do not like edit wars. --Meister und Margarita (talk) 23:53, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, you put up an entirely unsuitable landscape-sized image onto the top right side of the article at one point which I know was reverted by another editor.  In my opinion, the only shot on Commons right now is the one on the Spanish and German articles, but it badly needs cropping.  There's a character barely visible to the right (as though he is waiting to come onstage or hiding) and the painting slops into the frame at the left.  I'm not sure whether the licence given allows cropping, but I can easily pop it into Photoshop and get it to look a lot better.....  THEN, we can get a consensus on whether it works. Viva-Verdi (talk) 01:12, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very old-fashioned look 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Il trovatore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090423122934/http://www.uctv.tv/search-details.asp?showID=4311 to http://www.uctv.tv/search-details.asp?showID=4311
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified