Talk:Uniform Code of Military Justice

message: Since when are ROTC cadets and midshipmen subject to the UCMJ? The article states they are: "Also, Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) cadets and midshipmen as members of reserve components are subject to the UCMJ while on inactive-duty training." All Army cadets are in the United States Army Reserve Control Group as cadets but are exempt from the UCMJ. If a cadet is ALSO in the reserves such as SMP, then yes he or she is subject as a member of the reserves, but not as a cadet.Scalga (talk) 20:08, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: They are not. Art. 2 of the UCMJ that establishes jurisdiction mentions cadets and midshipmen, but both of those terms are defined in Art. 1 as meaning cadets and midshipmen of the service academies. It does not include ROTC cadets. See also  GregJackP Boomer!  08:44, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  ROTC 

message: I think the citation to the statue is incorrect. The UCMJ is codified at 10 U.S.C. 801 et. seq. If I'm not mistaken, can someone please change the cite? Zandar555 (talk) 09:06, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation 

message: Is the Uniform Code of Military Justice at  or ?  It looks like it's both.  Was it moved? —Markles 21:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 10 or Title 50? 

message: AWOL, missing movement, and desertion all link to desertion. These charges are completely different and carry completely different penalties. These links should change and have pages correctly written to show the differences in the charges.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thehotshotpilot (talk • contribs) 05:29, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Desertion 

message: A more extensive listing than I expected. But some additional specifics of interest- can the following under certain conditions could the following be subject to UCMJ: behavior of press while embedded or with a military unit in field or operational status, or what about civilian (non-uniformed) members of the Department of Defense ( or even contractors.  In some television show, under some circumstances personnel in these categories were subject to UCMJ for their actions. 
Wfoj2 (talk) 00:40, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: While POTUS has the Constitutional authority as Commander in Chief over the armed forces, s/he is not a member of the armed forces. Nor are the service secretaries. Thus the UCMJ does not apply. The article is correct in that it tells us who -- e.g., members -- are subject to the UCMJ. No change is needed.--S. Rich (talk) 19:30, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks...   NitPicker769 (talk) 03:14, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jurisdiction 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Uniform Code of Military Justice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719173532/http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/RL34697_20081006.pdf to http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/RL34697_20081006.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:56, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hi, I'm working on a book, but I can't access the UCMJ laws page. Can someone copy and paste please? Faithful15 (talk) 17:49, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I mean from the links, not from the Wikipage Faithful15 (talk) 17:50, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  UCMJ laws 

message: Doesn't this section belong more under the court's martial page? Chefs-kiss (talk) 12:13, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jurisdiction Section