lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Short Beach

message: I went ahead and did some major cleanup on this article.  I added sections and removed the most blatantly speculative & non-factual information.  It probably needs more work as far as citing its sources goes, but for now this should be a major improvement. --Hetar 08:46, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Cleanup

message: How many of these:
:in Short Beach are the Yale Corinthian Yacht Club (YCYC), Shore Automotive, Short Beach General Store, the Adult Day Care Center, Short Beach Church, Cranberries bakery, Argentine-Italian reasturant Che Tango, a fire house. 
Items are significant?  RJFJR (talk) 15:10, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: features

message: What's up with the signs along the beach declaring it to be private. Is it owned communally by the neighborhood or something? Thanks --Jolomo (talk) 18:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Private beach?
Talk:Hanuman (2005 film)

message: "It is India's first major commercial family animated feature."
Were there minor, non-family, animated features before this one, then?  Serious question, I'd like to know. Esn 04:48, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently, there were.  This should probably be mentioned. Esn 02:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Arachidonic acid

message: The study linked for this assertion just says, that varying the linoleic acid precursor in a Western-type diet typically abundant in  LA (and even lots of AA !), does not further increase AA blood levels and with extreme LA reduction AA may starts trending (sub-significantly) a little lower. This just indicates a tightly regulated control / feedback loop, besides possibly the effect of adipose fat tissue buffering over a long time, and potential chronic overload by excess preformed AA in the diet.
This review study also is concerned with the opposite: "Elevated tissue AA levels are believed to be positively associated with eicosanoid formation and risk for a variety of chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease, cancer and inflammation. The literature expresses concern over the fact that increasing dietary LA can potentially enrich tissues with AA due to their metabolic link."
That LA to AA conversion takes places in humans is well established (many studies even show the detailed mechanisms) and there are many vegans from birth meanwhile not consuming AA.
So this assertion seems absurd, and super absurd to be drawn from that study, and should probably removed.? Kxroberto (talk) 15:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It never hurts to have a keen eye review how other editors have characterized studies. It certainly suggests revision for further clarity would be salutary.  cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 21:26, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "it is uncertain if humans can in fact convert linoleic acid to arachidonic acid.[*]"
Talk:Quantization (image processing)

message: Specifically the problem is that it shows a nice large matrix without ever saying what those numbers mean.
I kind of guessed that the third matrix is the first divided by the second, and I can also guess that the first matrix is some sort of version of the image (something that should be clarified, or linked to an article discussing it.)
But the big problem is the second matrix: that is the main point of the article and I have no idea where those numbers came from!
71.199.123.24 16:11, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi all. I wrote the Color quantization article, which seems to have some overlap with this one (I just found this article). I'm not sure whether to remove the material in this article on color quantization and add a link, or to merge them into a single article. What do you think? Deco 08:16, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and merged out the content to color quantization, briefly summarizing it and linking it here. Deco 21:09, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color quantization 

message: This page's only citations are to a now dead article but I believe I've found a copy of the same article at: http://old.siggraph.org/education/materials/HyperGraph/video/mpeg/
If it's alright with everyone I'll relink it somehow but I don't know the protocol on this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omicron91 (talk • contribs) 03:44, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations
Talk:Love Kraft

message: - moved to review page Jezhotwells (talk) 03:05, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Article Review 
Talk:Madvillainy

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 18:16, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''

message: Now that Madvillain is prepping their second album, shouldn't it be time to give Madvillain their own page, and close the redirect from Madvillain to Madvillainy? That is what I propose. -The Hams 23:13, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Madvillain's own article

message: I merged the samples page with this one. The original Madvillain Samples page should be deleted.
The line "Madvillainy was supposedly produced entirely by using a portable turntable and an SP-303." is incorrect. Only the songs "Rhinestone Cowboy" and "Strange Ways" were made on it. The rest were done in Madlib's studio, using the SP1200 among other tools.
* All sample references should be deleted unless there's varification for them.  Too many guesses and errors are being posted.  MarcelloRubini 06:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Madvillainy'' Samples

message: I was a little surprised to see no discussion of this album's early leak to the internet in an incomplete form.  This is important because: It's referenced on the album (particularly in "Rhinestone Cowboy"), it may be one of the reasons for the Doomposters (possibly), and the controversy may have helped with the album's success (possibly).  I think I heard early versions of several tracks from it in 2003 on college radio.  Review mentioning the leak:  http://www.pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/5579-madvillainy/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.82.8.154 (talk) 22:28, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  No discussion of early leak to internet? 

message: Should the Madvillainy demo released in 2013 be included in this article at the bottom? It's an official Stones Throw release for Record Store Day.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hostagecat (talk • contribs) 09:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Madvillainy Demo Tape 
Talk:Rounds (album)

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 23:16, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''
Talk:Candling

message: 72.25.88.75 edited with this comment: (I think they meant 'potency' not 'patency' maybe I'm wrong).
I've reverted it because "patency" is a medical/biological term meaning "unblocked". I'm not quite sure what that refers to in the context of checking eggs, but it seems reasonable that the person who added it knew what they were talking about, and "potency" doesn't really make any sense here. Hopefully someone who knows more about it can confirm one way or the other. -dmmaus 09:08, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Patency?

message: Shouldn't this be a disambiguation page and not a stub?  Kiln candling has nothing to do with egg candling; egg candling can probably be merged in with the egg article and kiln candling can probably be merged in with an article on ceramics.--65.203.71.227 (talk) 02:04, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: dab?

message: Article fails to explain what candling actually is. which should be the primary topic of the article. Acwilson9 (talk) 00:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article fails to explain what candling actually is
Talk:Ricky Vega

message: I deleted the advance information on Machete's future in LAX.  When it happens on television tomorrow, it can be re-entered.  Until then, I advise to stick to the same rules that apply to the TNA iMPACT! television taping results. 70.111.32.34 00:42, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Trailer Park (album)

message: Looks like it worked ok.  Page was moved to avoid confusion with Trailer park (housing).  Kasreyn 16:14, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  disamb move 
Talk:Paid tha Cost to Be da Boss

message: It states, in 2003 a lawsuit was filed against Snoop Dogg while he was in jail at the time for the MGM arena mayhem, but when reading his legal incidents to find out more about what happened causing him to be in jail, I didn't find any further information on the incident. When I click on the link for 'MGM arena mayhem' it directs me to Tupac Shakur biography and couldn't find any further information there either. S0ulr3b3l (talk) 20:55, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk: Snoop Dogg-Paid tha Cost to Be da Boss-Controversy
Talk:13 & God (album)

message: :Image:13 & God - 13 & God.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:13 & God - 13 & God.jpg
Talk:United States of America Mathematical Olympiad

message: ℳ==Untitled==№
the introduction is really poorly written..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.111.31.88 (talk) 19:01, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

message: The selection process has probably changed a lot, but it's not clear that 2001 is an interesting date. Certainly the info for "2001 and earlier" is only accurate if you go back a year or two at most, from 2001. In 1995, four freshmen-and-under took the USAMO. I believe that as late as 1998 (and as early as 1991) it was still the case that they drew a cutoff for seniors and a lower cutoff for underclassmen -- and that was the entire process. Also the first few USAMOs just invited the top 100 guys on the AHSME, as the USAMO pre-dates the AIME.
The question arises -- how relevant is all this junk? Consider that it is useful information if someone puts on their resume that they qualified for the USAMO and the employer wants to know how impressive that is. It also might be useful for other reasons, although none come to mind at the moment. UnnotableWorldFigure 09:19, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: selection

message: Was some of that section pasted directly from somewhere else? It uses the phrase "We". Crasshopper (talk) 09:38, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  selection
Talk:Organization of emergency medical assistance

message: Yes, probably needs cleanup (written by a non-native english speaker).
However, I would like to point out my aim when I created the page: centralize and sum up the various articles about the topic. Not only a navigation tool that points to Paramedic, Emergency department, Trauma center, Samu etc. but also something that tries to explain the points in common to the different systems worldwide.
For example, Emergency Medical Services is specific to North-America, Samu is specific to France, but the Prehospital care strategies is general and was thus extracted from Emergency Medical Services.
Hope you understand my point of view.
cdang|write me 09:20, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup tag

message: Simply put, this article needs sources. Actual sources. Not a source (e.g. Rules of EMS) where some dude posted some e-mail spam to a website so it could be sources for medical care strategies. JPINFV (talk) 02:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up and copy edit tag

message: I think this page needs to be merged into one of the several EMS pages on wiki, it is written very opinionated. Medicellis (talk) 03:53, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Tetrahedral symmetry

message: I added the cleanup tag because this article needs more work. I like the examples added at the end, but they should be cleaned up, and data tables (pasted from elsewhere) removed as redundant.
Well, not necessarily a lot of work, but more than I want to do tonight!
Tom Ruen 09:21, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup (Feb 06) 

message: In sentence It is the direct product of the normal subgroup of T (see above) with Ci. Ci links to Inversive geometry. It is wrong reference link. Must be Point reflection. Jumpow (talk) 21:16, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, looks like the wikilink isn't correct, whether it was at some point I don't know. I changed to point reflection as you suggested. Tom Ruen (talk) 23:00, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong reference
Talk:Octahedral symmetry

message: An octahedron has 12 edges, so there cannot be four pairs of opposite edges. Isn't S_4 acting on opposite FACES?
139.104.180.28 (talk) 02:00, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds more likely Woscafrench (talk) 16:36, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faces not Edges? 

message: I added the cleanup tag because this article needs more work. I like the examples added at the end, but they should be cleaned up, and data tables (pasted from elsewhere) removed as redundant.
Well, not necessarily a lot of work, but more than I want to do tonight!
Tom Ruen 09:21, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do not remove data tables, it is convenient to have data about examples together on this page.--Patrick 12:35, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I do not see tables from elsewhere, just selected parts regarding the subject of the article.--Patrick 12:44, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup (Feb 06) 

message: I added the Stub tag at the bottom of the page, although the cleanup tag makes it redundant. Another Redundancy! —The Doctahedron, 68.173.113.106 (talk) 22:21, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub (2011-11-24)

message: Does a polyhedron exist that has octahedral and icosahedral symmetry groups and is flag-transitive????? —The Doctahedron (talk) 22:29, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a convex polyhedron. (The only flag-transitive convex polyhedra are the platonic solids.) And not a star polyhedron either. Nor skew polyhedra, which are infinite. You would have to look at abstract 3-polytopes for any possibilities. --kundor (talk) 16:19, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: God Polyhedron???

message: It is written in the text that Octahedral symmetry contains C3h symmetry - this is not true !  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.176.182.224 (talk) 08:23, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. —Tamfang (talk) 18:58, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  C3h symmetry 

message: Here's my reproduction of Conway's subgroup presentation, from The Symmetries of things, p280. It's more organized than an explicit tree, and contains some multiple copies of subgroups based on different relations. Conway showed + groups, - groups, and one middle +/- group, which I show as yellow/green, and pink respectively. I also drew red horizontal lines showing the group order divisions. The green lines show order-3 subgroup relationships between upper-left and lower-right graphs. Tom Ruen (talk) 05:17, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conway's subgroup presentation 

message: I found the phrase "symmetry order" in the introductory paragraph. This is a phrase that virtually no mathematician or math student has ever heard. Therefore do not use it.
The next section, Details, is almost 100% incomprehensible from the first word.
Suggestion: If you have no idea whatsoever how to communicate mathematics, please don't do it in Wikipedia.2600:1700:E1C0:F340:50EC:9DF9:703F:5234 (talk) 00:50, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Without a doubt this is one of the very worst math articles ever in Wikipedia.
Talk:Tyr (album)

message: I'm removing that AllMusic "review" on the basis that it's absolutely appalling, with absolutely no discussion of the quality of the music at all besides the rating. corrupt_toolbox (talk) 08:59, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing AllMusic review

message: Why is the title for this in all caps? Previously, it was located at "Tyr (album)", which I believe would be more correct. Furthermore, I believe that the policy on trademarks also makes this clear. I will await further comment before taking any action.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 02:29, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm just going to go for it.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 17:13, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: *Agree with this move, 'Tyr (album)' is the preferred title. J04n(talk page) 17:47, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization in title?
Talk:"Weird Al" Yankovic's Greatest Hits

message: "Weird Al Yankovic Corporate Anthem" Original album: Dare to be Stupid
I can't find that song anywhere on Dare to be Stupid? —Kloth (talk) 20:35, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Greatest Hits Volume II ("Weird Al" Yankovic album)

message: The article claims that GHVII includes the version of Smells Like Nirvana with the alternate solo, but the copy I own contains the original version. At least, I think it does. I've only heard the version on GHVII, so I can't compare, but Wikipedia claims that the original is around 3:40 in length, while the alternate version is over 4 minutes. The version I have is roughly 3:40, so either the song lengths are listed wrong, or GHVII doesn't have the alternate version of the song. 24.63.145.232 (talk) 23:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The article previously had its length as 3:42, the change to 4:47 was probably vandalism (the user who changed it has had most edits reverted). snigbrook (talk) 15:19, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate Solo? 
Talk:The TV Album

message: Cover Art by MAD magazine regular, Jack Davis. 119.11.11.179 (talk) 06:05, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Jack Davis
Talk:Vol. 2... Hard Knock Life

message: This article is included to "Concept album series" category. Are there any reliable sources that classify this album as "Concept album"? If there are none, it should be excluded from the category. Netrat (talk) 22:10, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concept album series? 
Talk:Vol. 3... Life and Times of S. Carter

message: It's not explained why the song Big Pimpin is "now-infamous". I will change this if someone can't come up with a decent reason. Thesean43 16:54, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it's been 2 years and you haven't made your move, what's stopping you?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.125.159.186 (talk) 00:50, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Infamous?

message: This article is included to "Concept album series" category. Are there any reliable sources that classify this album as "Concept album"? If there are none, it should be excluded from the category. Netrat (talk) 22:17, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concept album series? 

message: Transcription using Google News Advanced News Archive Search. Chicago Tribune (Kot, Greg. 3. January 9, 2000) review of Vol. 3… Life and Times of S. Carter (1999):
Dan56 (talk) 17:35, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Chicago Tribune review

message: Transcription using Google News Advanced News Archive Search. NME (Fadele, Dele. February 16, 2000) review of Vol. 3… Life and Times of S. Carter (1999):
Dan56 (talk) 21:21, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: NME review

message: Transcription using Google News Advanced News Archive Search. USA Today (Jones, Steve. 02.D. January 4, 2000) review of Vol. 3… Life and Times of S. Carter (1999):
Dan56 (talk) 22:35, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: USA Today review
Talk:The Blueprint 2: The Gift & The Curse

message: u say in this article that jay z was dissin ja rule are u sure bout dat? 89.201.184.51 (talk) 19:03, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Jay vs Ja??
Talk:Jayadratha

message: I think its fine. As I remember Shankar Bhagwan granted all boons otherwise.
DJagadev 03:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If i remember correctly, it was Dronacharya who granted him his life and not Yudhishtara. I am changing this now, but correct me if i am wrong.nids(♂) 01:12, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The shiva protect sentence

message: I am giving a brief story about him as i remember. If somebody can provide further references, i request him to enter this on the main page.
Drona and Jayadratha were students at the same gurukul and were best of friends. After their education, they parted ways. One day, drona went to see his old friend but was humiliated by him for his poverty. Then drona decided to take avenge. When he taught pandavas, he asked them to defeat Jayadratha as a token for his Gurudakshina.nids(♂) 01:18, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was thinking that as well. I remember Jaya and the chakra and Abhimanyu.04:47, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Brief story
Talk:List of governors of the Panama Canal Zone

message: Maurice Thatcher's Congress bio claims he was a civilian governor. This page claims he was the next-to-last military governor. Sources, anyone? --Alvestrand 09:32, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Biographical Directory of the United States Congress, Maurice H. Thatcher was civil governor of the Canal Zone, not military governor. According to Panama Review:  Thatcher Ferry Bridge - Linking the Americas, he was Chief of the Department of Civil Administration which controlled Canal Zone civil affairs and he was later referred to by the unofficial title of "First Governor of the Canal Zone". For a civilian lawyer, it would appear at least unusual to serve as military governor. --AHert (talk) 11:21, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maurice Thatcher - military or civilian?
Talk:Chungmugong Yi Sun-sin-class destroyer

message: This actually should be under KDX-II destroyer, but it's not possible to move it there at this time.  Komdori 14:48, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's no longer KDX-II, it's KD-II - the eXperimental phase ended. Also, we have go by the first-of-its-class name. Deiaemeth 05:58, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  We don't need to, since it officially has a different class name (the naming conventions talk about classes named in other ways).  We should at least mention this name bolded in the lead sentence.  If you feel strongly about it, move it back (I will not move it again), but in that case it would be nice to get some other opinions on this.  Now that I'm thinking about it, I'm not 100% sure what is best. Komdori 15:45, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

message: There is no mention of heli capabilities (in spite of the DDH designation). Would be nice if someone could fix this. --Jor70 (talk) 17:15, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Aircraft
Talk:King Sejong the Great class destroyer/Archive 1

message: A very nice start. I'm not sure if there is much more to be said, particularly as (if I'm reading this right) no ships of this class have been completed, let alone seen action. But it might be nice to have some non-prose Specifications, either in just a regular text section, or in an infobox of some sort. LordAmeth 14:24, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MilHist Assessment

message: The Koreans certainly will not call the ship "Sejong the Great" as an english title is very unlikely: According to the article the name is 세종대왕. Can anyone provide a proper transcription of this? --Gunter.krebs 10:42, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Class name