lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Muhammad Ali in media and popular culture

message: Would it be fair to add a section mentioning Ali's dominant, dancing style was the inspiration for Apollo Creed ? After all, in the main article it's stated that "In March 1975, Ali faced Chuck Wepner in a bout that inspired the original Rocky."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.81.175.217 (talk) 14:25, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Apollo Creed

message: I find the following passage to be difficult to follow:
:The 1971 Barratt & Co. LTD is generally considered to be Clay/Ali's true rookie card as it meets most collector's definition of a rookie card. Although it's not his first card, it's widely accepted as his Rookie Card. Example: Tiger Woods RC is the 2001 SP Authentic /900. However, it was not Tiger's first card by a long shot. Ali did not appear on an American trading card until 1982 with an appearance in a Topps Olympic set.
The Rookie card article says that "A rookie card is a trading card that is the first to feature a specific athlete." If the 1971 Barratt & Co. card isn't the first appearance of Ali on a trading card, then what was his first card? And the Tiger Woods card issue, which is discussed more clearly in the Rookie card article, is not relevant to Ali. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trading cards 

message: I have removed the following from the article:
*City of Ali is a 2021 theatrically released documentary  details how Ali's death brought the people of his hometown, Louisville, Kentucky.
External links are not permitted in running text, and there is no Wikipedia article on City of Ali. BD2412 T 23:41, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  City of Ali
Talk:Reebok/Archive 1

message: Original Research tag added to recent news section.
There is no evidence that the given reason is the real reason behind the loss in revenue Aniket ray 13:02, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can anyone tell me what the reebok symbol is called? I have done a lot of research and cannot find it. Thanks!
The logo of reebok has a name, "Vector". I presume that the logo represents the massive magnitude and uplooking direction (as in the geometry term, "vector") that the company wishes to portray to the public and the buyers of reebok apparel.  I found "Vector" below my reebok shoe box.  See more here Sjsharksrs 09:38, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reebok Logo 

message: Shouldn't the DMX line be included in the article?
:It's added. Sjsharksrs 08:15, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  DMX Line 

message: I have heard that Reebok has their own line of bedding; is it true? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shawkf (talk • contribs) 17:14, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bedding 

message: It is not universally accepted that "sweatshops" are bad. If the labor is voluntary and those working there are better than not working there then "human rights" have not been infringed. Merely tossing this in accepts a priori that sweatshops are bad.
: Human rights is the provision of livelihood to people. If the workers work below the living wage, they are not given the necessary resources to live, their human rights are gone! Ruennsheng 11:49, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias point of view 
Talk:Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (film)/Move request

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Strong Support - Per reasons given (I'm not trying to be biased, I am a Briton anyway) Reginmund 18:07, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:List of Imran Series by Ibn-e-Safi

message: Title of this page is not correct, it is not about old and new. It should be 
List of Imran Series by Ibn-e-Safi
or List of Original Imran Series
Because Ibn-e-Safi was the original writer of this series.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LifeH2O (talk • contribs) 16:26, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Complete List of Imran Series (Old). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 24#Complete List of Imran Series (Old) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 12:08, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Complete List of Imran Series (Old)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:List of Jasoosi Dunya by Ibn-e-Safi

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Complete List of Jasoosi Dunya (Old). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 24#Complete List of Jasoosi Dunya (Old) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 12:11, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Complete List of Jasoosi Dunya (Old)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Action of 5 October 1804

message: I've been seeing on the news that there's a legal battle over treasure from a Spanish ship called the Mercedes - I thought they said it was sunk in 1805 on the news, but it may have been 1804. They say there's a legal battle with Spain and some divers over salvaged treasure from the ship. I did some perusing and I'm assuming the treasure ship is the one mentioned in this article. I'm assuming other people will find this page as the news proliferates, hopefully someone will have more information. (I just wanted to start a thread to bring up the issue). JW (talk) 17:02, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Legal battle over the Mercedes
Talk:Portal Three Kingdoms

message: Portal Second Age and Portal Three Kingdoms have only a few KB of text, much of which is either unsourced or too in-universe 
*Support: as nom pbp 18:24, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge with [[Portal (Magic: The Gathering)]]
Talk:Kisizi

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* Write here
62.255.196.83 (talk) 16:08, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: While I'm not absolutely positive, the coordinates in the article appear to be probably correct, so I'm deactivating the template. Is your objection to the coordinates or to the labeling? If it's the labeling, then the  template does not apply. I'm not watching this page; please put a note on my talk page if you want to discuss this further. — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 17:55, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
File talk:Logo of the Army of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina.svg

message: Organization and group logos (including reproductions and derivative works) cannot be licensed under the GFDL as the work of the uploader. It must either be in the public domain or appropriately licensed as fair use. Vassyana (talk) 15:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, license it as it must be... i posted this picture that I made a long time ago, I don't know what are new rules and standards. Regards. --HarisM (talk) 00:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invalid license 

message: This is seal of Army. If that must be copyrighted than you all have problem. --HarisM (talk) 23:46, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone is stupid
Talk:List of organizations in Alex Rider

message: I have redirected this article since it's just basically a whole bunch of plot detail that's already well-explained in the plot summaries of the novel articles.  It doesn't prove any out-of-universe information that would require a separate article.  For instance, the functions of Scorpia are already covered well in the plot summaries of its eponymous novel and in Snakehead and do not need to be repeated here.  The other three orgs. only show up in one novel each and are well-covered in Snakehead and Ark Angel.  The MI6 description a short stubby paragraph whose function can be explained in the main Alex Rider article, if need be. hbdragon88 (talk) 01:08, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Imran series characters

message: New characters introduced by other writers (e.g. Mazhar Kaleem and Zaheer Ahmed) should be separate from original characters. Also their descriptions should clearly mention if they have been changed by other writers.
Original Imran Series has not that many characters as there are now in Mazhar Kaleem's writings.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LifeH2O (talk • contribs) 22:12, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separation of Original (Ibn-e-Safi) characters and new characters 

message: Villains page would be created separately with enough information and story overview of that novel.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mimrananwar (talk • contribs) 08:57, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separation of villains
Talk:Dibba

message: The Template infobox settlement is intended to be used for one settlement in one country. This article, the Dibba article,  refers to a region that is divided between two countries and two emirates (Sharjah and Fujairah) in one country (UAE) of the two contries. therefor, many of the values of the parameters in the infobox can't contain information for the three settlements(Dibba Al-Fujairah, Dibba Al-Hisn, Dibba Al-Baya. So in this case, this infobox is giving wrong informaion.
The current event is the event in the "Marine Life" section.
You are right about the parent category. I thought it is OK to be used this way.
Thanks for your contribution —Preceding unsigned comment added by UAEPrivate (talk • contribs) 12:05, 3 March 2009
:And thanks for answering my request here. That's fine about the infobox; generally speaking, if you're going to make a removal like that, it's good practice to explain why on the article talk page. I've taken it out again. Also, I didn't notice the marine life section - I've added  there now. One last thing - on talk pages, please use "~~~~" to sign your comments.
:Thanks very much for your work on the article! — Hex (❝?!❞) 14:43, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: This article certainly needs a map to indicate the location of Dibba. werldwayd (talk) 13:30, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Map
Talk:WKQK

message: The station was issued a forfeiture notice by the FCC for $12k for failing to keep its antennas painted..  Their web site is now disabled, and the FCC search shows no license for WMEL - unknown if the call sign changed or the FCC pulled the license, but WMEL is part of radio history.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 03:51, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Chronic Poverty Research Centre

message: The Chronic Poverty Research Centre is carrying out work of international interest on poverty in cooperation with universities throughout the Uk, Africa and Asia.  Chronic Povery is an important concept that is currently missing from Wikipedia and those interested in poverty research would find useful resources through the CPRC and partner websites.
The CPRC is one of a new breed of Development Research Centres supported by the UK Department for International Development so the aim of its inclusion on Wikipedia is to share research knowledge and invite wider debate on this important issue. This development research will contribute to the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals.
CPRC research has been published in journals including World Development, Journal of Development Studies, Poverty in Focus (UNDP), Insights, etc
(Judith Gracey (talk) 16:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: The listed references seem to cover the topic of chronic poverty in general, with little to no relevance for the organization itself. The removed references are still available in article history, in case editors would like to use them as ressources for other poverty-related articles. But this article about 1 organization should only focus on the organization itself. GermanJoe (talk) 12:52, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Off-topic" references removed
Talk:BNIM

message: Attempts have been made by by User:Kgreen11 and 63.254.68.1 to delete the history section of the article which deals with the firm's principals contribution to the Kansas City Hyatt Regency and One Kansas City Place.  The article has been substituted with what sounds like p.r. fluff.  I am sympathetic to listing awards but please cite references for them.  No effort should be made to sanitize the firm history. Americasroof (talk) 16:17, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ad words and attempts to delete Hyatt references
Talk:Cerithiopsidae

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 22:45, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Tom Clancy's Net Force Explorers

message: I was wondering if other people thought that the table should include the actual authors of the books, since they were only created by Tom Clancy and Steve Pieczenik. I have most of the books and I could add authors and whatever other information i find in the books if people thought that was a good idea.
Thecheesinator (talk) 23:15, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual Authors 

message: Just wondering if inserting an excerpt from the book is allowed? I didn't write this article, but I was wondering.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.22.79.228 (talk) 02:31, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Excerpts
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ice-nine fusion

message: "Ice-nine" has entered the language as a term for disasterous conversion scenarios as witnessed by Nobel laureate Frank Wilczec's letter to the editor of Scientific American in 1999 that used the term to describe the scenario that was the subject of my March 2000 Web page "The Strange Matter of Planetary Destruction". RickWagnerPhD (talk) 16:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't care it was a quote from a noble piece prize winner This basically the same as the danger of conversion from the strangelets article. 58.178.129.28 (talk) 11:54, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Push Your Head Towards the Air

message: I'm unsure of the reasoning behind the odd vandalism and reversion going on here.  Do please explain why such changes should stay.  violet/riga (t) 16:33, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We avoid the term "Sophomore" because it is predominantly a term used in the US only.  The form I used is grammatically more appropriate because it avoids the horrible "Editors'", using "by Editors".  The date formats, as discussed on Talk:Editors, are a minor thing but should really be d mmmm yyyy.  You say that your changes are "more accurate and informative" but there really is nothing you added and as I stated there are "poorly structured sentences".  violet/riga (t) 16:46, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversions
Template talk:Barbel class submarine

message: I think the Dutch Zwaardvis and Taiwanese Hai Lung classes should be removed from this template, with a separate template made for the Zwaardvis class, including the Hai Lungs, especially as they were all built in the Netherlands. A similar appearance and general arrangement does not amount to "the same" class. There is no indication from the articles that assistance of any kind was received from the United States in developing these submarines. Also, the Barbel-class' beam is 0.4 meters more than in the Dutch-built classes. RobDuch (talk) 21:50, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zwaardvis and Hai Lung classes not close enough
Talk:By the Rivers of Babylon

message: OK, it's a long time since I read this, but didn't one plane get blown up with the loss of all aboard, and the other one crashed.  The article seems to say that both crash landed and had to be defended.
Aslo, wasn't it a case of a bomb on board forcing them down, rather than hijackers. --Dmol (talk) 16:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: True, one of the planes was blown up pretty fast already over the Mediterranean. But luckily all the main characters sat in the other plane, so DeMille could continue his story ;-) --92.77.155.15 (talk) 21:55, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Both planes crashed??
Talk:Eulimidae

message: This article was based on the corresponding article in Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 , which is not compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. This article has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Invertzoo (talk) 13:14, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: It seems Stiliferidae are considered part of Eulimidae by some sources. For example, WoRMS called Stiliferidae "not accepted", but concedes that some sources classify Stiliferidae as a family in their own right under Eulimoidea. Should Wikipedia follow WoRMS, or continue as it does currently, with a separate article for Stiliferidae? Inductiveload (talk) 21:11, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have copied this question onto the talk page of the gastropod project. Invertzoo (talk) 20:56, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stiliferidae as a separate family?
Talk:Cathedral (novel)

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://nelsondemille.net/books/cathedral.asp?id=desc. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 12:34, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Template talk:Blue Ridge class command ship

message: I was stationed on a LPH amphibious helicopter ship in the 1980's. I can't help but notice the Blue Ridge class amphibious ship has a similar hull design. Does anyone know if they used the LPH hull as a basis for the Blue Ridge design?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.165.17.120 (talk) 08:30, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blue Ridge class based on LPH class? 

message: According to U.S. amphibious ships and craft: an illustrated design history By Norman Friedman, the Blue Ridge class was based upon an LPH hull with modifications.
See http://books.google.com/books?id=oWX-x0b4pw4C&pg=PA429&lpg=PA429&dq=lph+hull+ridge&source=bl&ots=evs06-BKoF&sig=5M8T8Qi39tr6i1sDe33vMVgcpcU&hl=en&ei=sxiwS5_MJYGB8gb_0O3qCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=10&ved=0CBwQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=lph%20hull%20ridge&f=false  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.171.103.106 (talk) 03:10, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Answer
Template talk:Brooklyn class cruiser

message: The American cruiser templates seem to all insist that the Portland class ships came after the New Orleans class. Despite USS New Orleans being assigned CA-32 and USS Portland receiving CA-33, the Portlands were an older design and were, in fact, built first. Therefore I'm rearranging the order in the templates to reflect this. Dziban303 (talk) 05:17, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  rearranging order
Talk:Mashup (digital)

message: This is not intended to be an advertising page. If the objection is to the use of "YouTube", then I will edit that to something not involving a brand name.
:I don't believe that there is anything inherently wrong with your page, but some references would be good. Mh29255 (talk) 16:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  untitled 

message: show your opinion  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.27.51.145 (talk) 13:10, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should YouTube Poop get its own page?
Template talk:Buckley class destroyer escort

message: I've combined the two USN sections ("completed" and "Completed as Charles Lawrence-class…") in this template for a couple of reasons:
#All the ships in the USN section were Buckley-class destroyer escorts at one time, regardless of what they were later converted to. (For example, we don't break down other navboxes by other ship fates, like "Yorktown-class aircraft carriers sunk in battle")
#Since Template:Charles Lawrence class transport also exists, there's no point in Template:Buckley class destroyer escort repeating the same information
#A navbox doesn't have to give all information about everything. The class article is the best place to explain subtle distinctions like 'this group was completed as that type' or 'ships of these numbers were canceled', etc.
— Bellhalla (talk) 18:43, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charles Lawrence class info 

message: I have included this template in :Category:Frigate templates as the Royal Navy ships were classed as Captain-class frigates. Dunarc (talk) 00:01, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories