lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Norwich School, Norwich

message: There are substantial statistics available on schooling in Norfolk which should be able to resolve many of the questions people have raised:
http://education.guardian.co.uk/secondaries/tables/0,,1985499,00.html —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tecoates (talk • contribs) 10:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statistics on schooling
Talk:Insula

message: I still think that my edit regarding making this page redirect to insular cortex is correct, since the other pages mentioned in the disambiguation are not as relevant at all. For example, a quick google search regarding the term "Insula" shows that the results of the first three pages at least almost exclusively are regarding insular cortex and not regarding any of the other articles in the disambiguation page. Therefore I think that this should redirect to what one 99% of the time would be searching for when searching "Insula". And for the other 1%, they can go to the disambiguation page from the article regarding insular cortex. 
This is a quote from Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Is there a primary topic?: "Although a word, name, or phrase may refer to more than one topic, sometimes one of these topics can be identified as the term's primary topic. This is the topic to which the term should lead, serving as the title of (or a redirect to) the relevant article. [...] While Wikipedia has no single criterion for defining a primary topic, two major aspects that editors commonly consider are these: A topic is primary for a term with respect to usage if it is highly likely—much more likely than any other single topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined—to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that term. A topic is primary for a term with respect to long-term significance if it has substantially greater enduring notability and educational value than any other topic associated with that term."Lymoz (talk) 10:34, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Propose a proper move rather than cutting and pasting. older ≠ wiser 10:15, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Undiscussed moves are allowed assuming that "There has been no discussion (especially no recent discussion) about the title of the page that expressed any objection to a new title; and it seems unlikely that anyone would reasonably disagree with the move." Right now you're simply disagreeing with my move because of the sake of it and not because of some argument to be made regarding Insula continuing to be a disambiguation page.Lymoz (talk) 10:34, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Cut and paste moves are never allowed. If you had properly moved the page yourself or even made technical moverequest I likely would not have even noticed. older ≠ wiser 10:57, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Then I apologize for my mistake, and for my rather uncivilized attitude. I've had a bad day and I should not let it affect how I treat others.Lymoz (talk) 11:32, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation or redirect
Talk:The Futureheads (album)

message: *Does anyone know the 3 bonus tracks that were on the Japanese release of this CD?  I can't find the names anywhere... Just let me know what those 3 tracks are. --G VOLTT 20:01, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese bonus tracks? 

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 17:11, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''

message: Just bought a second hand cd of this (and remember this version being around after the Hounds of Love Single) - there's another UK version of this, has the bonus tracks but not the dvd and the original grey artwork/cover. Copyright is 2004/2005 on 679 Recordings. 109.224.137.121 (talk) 18:20, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other UK version of the album
Talk:Native Dancer

message: Native Dancer was not considered to be the top throughbred in 1953 - the honor went to Tom Fool, who won horse of the year that year. He won and was proud
"The image of "throw away" horses which are raced and then forgotten is a myth."
This statement is an opinion not a fact, and a spurious opinion at that.  Take a look at what happened to Ferdinand, a Kentucky Derby winner, who was a dud in the breeding shed and ended up being slaughtered in a Japanese Slaughterhouse.  Take a look at George Washington who was put back on the track because of fertility problems and was euthanized on the track at Monmouth Park when he broke a leg in the Breeder's Cup Classic as a 5 year old.  Take a look at the recent stories about killing thouroughbreds that don't win in Puerto Rico because they are to expensive to care for.  Take a look at the recent piece done by HBO's Real Sports about the sale of non-winning racehorses from Mountaineer Downs in West Virginia for a few hundred dollars to "meatmen" who inturn auction the horses off for a few hundred more dollars after which the horses are carted off to Canada or Mexico for slaughter.  If not for organizations like the Kentucky Horse Park I wonder what would have happened to some of the great geldings like Cigar and John Henry once they could no longer race.  I think the image of the "throw away" horse is very much alive if you look beyond the pageantry of the Triple Crown races. Scarletnite (talk) 18:08, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Great Unconformity

message: When creating this article, I could not find the correct name for this feature.  Is it Great Unconformity or The Great Unconformity? Vegaswikian 21:09, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Essentially, just "Great Unconformity", although in running text a "the" is needed for grammar. Melchoir 15:16, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: To put it simply: this article, and the references it is based on, are so poor that I am preparing to completely rewrite it.
: - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 20:08, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  I think there ought to be another section describing how "The Great Unconformity" is iconic for Young Earth creationists, but by WP:WEIGHT there should also be an explanation of why that view is totally rejected by the geology.  And I don't have (yet?) sourcing for that. - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 22:13, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite. 

message: Although I'm aware that Hutton's Unconformity is sometimes referred to as the "Great Unconformity", it doesn't seem to fit in with the rest of the article. Sections 3,4 & 5 are all about the "Base Cambrian" unconformity, which Hutton's Siccar Point example is not. Would it be better to just mention it in a hatnote? Mikenorton (talk) 23:44, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does Hutton's Unconformity fit in here?
Talk:Tree pangolin

message: I propose that this page be moved to Tree Pangolin to standardize the pangolin pages. Currently, 6 of the 8 species have the "P" capitalized in their article name. (See also: Talk:Philippine pangolin#Proposed move) dude❶❽❶❽ (talk) 20:54, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, and updated text to match title. - UtherSRG (talk) 04:48, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move 

message: is it legal to have as a pet i live in new jersy  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.5.133.62 (talk) 22:09, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  hi 

message: — Assignment last updated by Janawollesen (talk) 03:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Bio 488 Mammalogy
Talk:Zwitter

message: Is a whole page for one song necessary?
*No.  --Xcali 21:48, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I changed the bit about a "classic crescendo ending". Its not a crescendo, its a diminuendo; it gets quieter. Crescendo means getting louder.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grungedude22 (talk • contribs) 13:16, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song Desc. 
Talk:Richard Reed Parry

message: Richard Reed Parry's father and Friends of Fiddler's Green should certainly have articles of their own. Probably more so than Richard.
*Canadian Folk Music Bulletin obituary
*Bio from wife Caroline Parry's site
*Borealis Records
*Ian Robb's obit of David Parry from Sing Out! magazine
*The Friends of Fiddler's Green page
*Friends of Fiddler's Green page at Vancouver Folk Music Festival site
*History of The Friends of Fiddler's Green from The Living Tradition magazine
*Estelle Klein Award 2003
DoubleBlue (Talk) 21:48, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: David Parry and the [[Friends of Fiddler's Green]]

message: Here are references previously dumped into the External links section. They don't belong there; it isn't like a parking lot for sources! You can put them here though, as I am doing now! Once you find they have been used to the fullest extent to improve the article, just cross them out from this list here like this! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 08:06, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References available for use go here
Talk:Dark Lord of the Sith

message: From the article: "Dark Lord of the Sith or Dark Lady of the Sith is a fictional title created by George Lucas for his Star Wars universe."
Is the term "Dark Lady of the Sith" ever actually used in the star wars cannon?
Because i always thought "Dark Lady of the Sith" was just a fannon thing, based on one sith lord (Lumiya) who is called the "Dark Lady". 
Is there actually anything cannon that suggests "Dark Lady of the Sith" is a female version of "Dark Lord of the Sith"? 
Didn't all the other female sith lords simply call themselves Dark Lords? Yaksha 07:42, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Dark Lady of the Sith"

message: Is it confirmed anywhere that Jacen Solo is DLOTS?  If so, a reference should probably be mentioned.
The Jacen Solo article only says that he's treading the path of the Sith and so forth- but I see nothing saying that he's actually the DLOTS. --DarthBinky 19:32, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jacen Solo = DLOTS? 

message: Why is Sidious dated until 11ABY?  Surely his reign ended when Vaders did at 4ABY?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thedarxide (talk • contribs) 21:57, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates
Talk:James Joseph Sylvester

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 02:33, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked few other sources like MathWorld, etc. and it is definitely true that Euler invented the function itself.  On the other hand, Sylvester might have named it.  I will make a small editorial change to clarify this.  Mhym 02:04, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: The box says that his residence was in the United States.  Since he lived in the US twice, once for six months and the other time for about seven years, and otherwise lived in England, I am changing this to UK. Jhobson1 (talk) 17:28, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sylvester's residence 

message: The Chebyshev–Sylvester constant link goes to Prime Number Theorem and neither Sylvester nor his C-S constant are mentioned on that page.  Some disentangling or rewriting would seem in order... Jamesdowallen (talk) 17:30, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chebyshev–Sylvester constant 

message: The Times obit gives the street in Mayfair, London where Sylvester died (around the corner from his favourite retreat, the Athenaeum); is it likely that while on his death bed he nipped back to Oxford for a quick lecture and failed to use his return ticket?
Chrysippo (talk) 15:48, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of death 

message: I would like to see a summary of Sylvester's principal mathematical achievements, with references.  Mathbird (talk) 21:36, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Achievements 

message: "James Joseph Sylvester was called to the Bar. Rather than practising law, he gave private instruction in mathematics, and counted among his pupils Florence Nightingale."   If someone wants to follow up and add. Acorrector (talk) 12:48, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Florence Nightingale - a student
Talk:Heliotropism

message: How about heliotropism in humans? (posted by user:213.228.0.12 on January 7 2006)
:No - pretty much by definition, tropisms only occur in plants. Humans can be sensitive to the sun, yes, but that's not the same thing. DS 15:30, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heliotropism in humans 

message: "Heliotropism" implies growth, which would be irreversible, but this form of plant movement restores itself, much like Thigmonasty.  It has been proposed to me that heliotropism is a misnomer, and "helionasty" is the more appropriate term.  Is there any expert knowledge on this one? Sigil VII (talk) 18:37, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Heliotropism is a historical name, and apparently it is acceptable to professors of biological sciences. See the first reference of the article, written by a professor of biological sciences at the University of Missouri-Columbia. Ceinturion (talk) 13:56, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More appropriate term? 

message: Wouldn't replacing motion or movement to change in orientation or a single word for such an idea be make the distinction between heliotropism and phototaxis clearer to a reader without much background in biology? Obviously, land plants are not capable of motion toward or away from any stimulus, but the use of a term such as motion or movement may temporarily confuse a reader.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.219.185.3 (talk) 20:40, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification of definition definition 

message: How do the findings recently published in SCIENCE affect this article?
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/353/6299/541
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/353/6299/587.full.pdf+html
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/08/05/488891151/the-mystery-of-why-sunflowers-turn-to-follow-the-sun-solved  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seitz (talk • contribs) 04:45, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New findings in SCIENCE
Talk:Nikolai Morozov (revolutionary)

message: Another Nikolai Morozov was responsible for the New Chronology but not this one. He was principly a physicist. The other Nikolai Morozov wrote his book in 1930, "Christ", and therefore could not be this one.
:You are mistaken. The physicist Morozov and the "New Chronologer" Morozov are the same person. — Monedula 18:17, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Since no one has contradicted Monedula, & a Google search confirms his identification, I've removed the paragraph denying the identification. -- llywrch 17:49, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: For more details: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SAR23/Terrorism_%26_Terrorist_Tagging_are_POV_%26_Subjective
SAR23 15:21, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Terrorism & Terrorist Tagging are POV & Subjective

message: It is a link in the article, hence I didn't touch it, but it should be corrected.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wlod (talk • contribs) 14:04, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suvalki, not Sulvalki

message: The stuff about him enlisting as a sniper in 1942 is described as mythology in the Russian Wikipedia, which states that this invention arose no earlier than 2007, and no corroborating documents exist of him ever enlisting to serve in WWII. Cheers, --CopperKettle 18:10, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sniper at age 88?
Talk:Biblioteca Mediceo Laurenziana

message: I do not thik that some quotes from a website of public library belonging to a public institution regarding the access to the public library, the contents of the public library, like number of manuscrips and collections can be copyrighted. I do not think taht the plastic intervention of the author can make such informations copyrighted. Can I put the url adress of the library, or is copy protected?
But if the general opinion is that this in a copyright infirgerment the so be it, I'll make a table.
Considering that I don't want credit for this is not a plagiate.
And considering the sand castle nature of any wikipedia article the tag is not relevant.
And at least I have a little content I'm not alone:
I have found another two sites with copyright violations:-)
:Information is not copyright, though sources should be cited. Text is copyright. A good test is to cut and paste a sentence or two that you suspect are stolen, and google them. Enjoy catching the violators! It's a service to Wikipedia. Do you know how to sign your edits with four tildes? --Wetman 03:59, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The copy and pasted text is only a small quote (only half of the passage used by the canadian University)
It is not ok to put? the quotes and the source?CristianChirita 07:09, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:CiTV

message: Moved from article:
(Note that this list currently features mostly programmes from the 90s - additions from the 80s and 00s are welcome)
BillyH 22:26, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The programme list is pretty big. I suggest a seperate page (List of CiTV programmes). A subcat of :Category:ITV television programmes would be useful too (since the BBC has one). The JPS 19:36, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Grand Forks International Airport

message: I know that the airport sometimes technically bears the "Mark Andrews" moniker, but nobody really uses it.  Also, the airport's website doesn't even use "Mark Andrews" once (as far as I can see).  Would it be a good idea to have this article located at Grand Forks International Airport and make Mark Andrews International Airport a redirect and simply include mention of the "Mark Andrews" name in the Grand Forks International Airport article instead? --MatthewUND 22:26, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
:My impetus to start the article here was mainly influenced by some of the radio ads put up by the TSA when they were hiring, where they used the Mark Andrews name.  But the signage at the airport clearly indicates "Grand Forks International Airport."   So I don't have a problem moving it in that regard... just that we should hold off on moving the article until the wiki has been upgraded to version 1.5 -- otherwise, it would be a cut-and-paste job, and we'd lose the edit history.  Alternatively, we could get an admin to move the page straight away.  --Alexwcovington (talk) 03:03, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the page. If the redirect has no history but a redirect, you can move the page without needing to delete anything. Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 19:00, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
Someone should update the runway diagram... It is available at http://dtpp.myairplane.com/pdfs/05187AD.PDF in PDF form. The image on the current site is outdated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.220.79.160 (talk) 15:50, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:PFC Spartak 1918

message: This article doesn't really make sense. How can the kuwaiti national team be playing in the bulgarian leage. And how can the team have won the league title 339.5 times ?? ....... in 80 years? If someone doesn't provide some sources, i'll edit this article further down. Jacoplane 22:45, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stanley Rous

message: ;Sir" is often left off page titles. --Wetman 22:46, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I will redirect Sir Stanley Rous to Stanley Rous then. --Carioca 23:14, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

text: Eh? 1895 + 91 = 1986 (the year he died). Oops. Ref (chew)(do) 00:20, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi. The article claimed at one point that his ashes were scattered on a football pitch near where he was born in Norfolk. Also categorised as Born in Norfolk.
I can assure you that he was born in Mutford, Suffolk, as per his autobiography referenced in the article. I have amended the relevant category. I also assumed that the ashes-scattering reference was therefore mistaken, and happened on a Suffolk football pitch. However, having attempted and failed to find a reliable source for this information, I am forced to remove it as per the guideline. If anyone comes up with a good reference for the deleted content, please re-add it along with the reference. Thanks. Ref (chew)(do) 20:12, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Bizarrely the article had two different birth and death locations! I;ve cleared it up and added a bunch of biographical stuff which comes from good sources. I have no idea if he was cremated even let alone where his ashes may be. I doubt somehow that that's the most important thing about him! --Blue Square Thing (talk) 19:40, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ashes scattered: Norfolk or Suffolk 
Talk:SEMI

message: Since SEMI redirects to Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International (the current title), is there a reason not to move this article to SEMI? —C.Fred (talk) 18:41, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: . Page moved – wbm1058 (talk) 16:58, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Edison High School (Huntington Beach, California)

message: Lists of names in this article should be sourced in accordance with WP:BLP. As there is no way of constantly maintaining linked articles, this applies to names which have a Wikipedia article as well as those that do not. Any name listed with no verifiable citations should be removed. Refer to WP:NLIST for guidance. Fæ (talk) 05:33, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lists of names
Talk:Lauren Collins

message: This page has clearly become a fan-site; as the information is organized poorly and includes unnecessary information. I believe the trivia and tidbits can be worked in more clearly, and need not appear like they were edited by a 10-year-old. Pardon me if I have offended anyone, but I belive as-is, the majority of this page might be worthy of deletion. mysekurity 23:47, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Amen to all of the above.  Some of the fannish stuff might be suitable trivia, but most of it is not appropriate for an encyclopedia.  I'm going to get working on it.--Esprit15d 20:02, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Use pipe for categories as per this guideline.
Ianblair23 7 July 2005 02:58 (UTC)
:Sorry, you are correct. My mistake. Any thoughts on cleaning this piece of junk up?
mysekurity 7 July 2005 22:48 (UTC)
She was in Shane Dawson's Video Degrassi part 2, shouldnt that be included?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.73.144.45 (talk) 16:20, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because it's trivial content that has no place here. The constant addition of that little tidbit is precisely why the article was locked. Wikipedia isn't here to promote some YouTube celebrity. Pinkadelica♣ 20:23, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 

message: Is it important at all if she was on an episode of Shane Dawson? 68.204.47.18 (talk) 02:18, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shane Dawson 
Category talk:Lists of postal codes

message: I think this is absolutely necessary. All US state-lists could be transferred there. deeptrivia (talk) 02:33, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - US lists now in subcat :Category:Postal codes of the United States. Dl2000 21:54, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subcategory for US Zip codes 

message: Don't all the pages listed in this category and its subcategories fail WP:NOTDIRECTORY? --Stfg (talk) 18:03, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: List of postal codes in Japan was twice deleted with Template:db tagging. I understand Wikipedia has a general policy for deleting articles that users find useful and worthy of existing, because how else can we waste people hours more enthusiastically than in deletion debates? What I don't get is why we are applying speedy deletions inconsistently by country. --Makkachin (talk) 16:42, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:NOTDIRECTORY