Talk:WVBR-FM

message: * The schedule in Specialty programming section needs to be removed.  WP:NOT#DIR specifically says that this kind of content is not appropriate: an article on a radio station generally should not list upcoming events, current promotions, phone numbers, current schedules, etc. Removal of this information has been reverted several times, I'd like to get some consensus from other editors. --Rtphokie (talk) 18:59, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe WVBR-FM's specialty programming IS historically significant.  I concede that this section would be far better as prose rather than a list, however it is significant in the context of this radio station.  Weathermandan (talk) 19:05, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

text: If the list of programs are included in either form and not in the "5a to 9a - whatever show" form, this will allow the list to remain and clear the WP:NOT#NOT rule.  Take Care...NeutralHomer talk|edits 19:16, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  current schedule 

message: As has been noted in my edit summary, this article suffers from violations of WP:NOT#DIR, WP:NOTWEBHOST, and WP:IINFO to name a few. WVBR-FM is not the personal nor professional website for radio station WVBR-FM. User:Weathermandan has admitted his association with this station () which may be leading to a violation of WP:COI. WVBR-FM is NOT a webpage for the history of this radio station. JPG-GR (talk) 02:51, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing of extensive cruft

message: WVBR is a commercial radio station without any formal relationship with a university.  Traditionally, area students hold management roles, but it's in no way exclusive.   I am quite familiar with WP:COI - and I clearly stated I am a former staff member and member of management of this radio station.  Any edits I make on Wikipedia are objective.  I'm glad to see that JPG-GR has taken it upon himself/herself to delete half the article without any semblance of consensus here on the Talk page.  I also like how Rtphokie recruited the help of his/her minions after he/she reached three reverts on the article.
Oh, and I love the snide comments made on the WikiProject Radio Stations talk page.
Well, I've also reached three reverts today, but I'm not going to ask my friends to help me out.  It's editors like you that make editors like me run away from Wikipedia.  Weathermandan (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 03:02, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm gonna follow WP:AGF and assume you've read WP:AGF. Additionally, consensus is not required to enforce policy, such as WP:NOT. None of the information I removed has any place in a Wikipedia article. If WVBR-FM wants to put that information on a subpage, so be it (based on the lack of history acknowledgment by most television and radio stations, I doubt it). Simply, and crudely, put: Wikipedia is not Geocities. JPG-GR (talk) 03:21, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Hmm... WP:ATTACK comes to mind. Plus, who said anything about a personal website? And what does NH have to do with anything? I think we have the cliche mountain out of the molehill here. JPG-GR (talk) 23:06, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  So much for consensus...