lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Constitutional growth delay

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20090317072825/http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/919677-overview. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:44, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Ernesto Cofiño

message: Venerable:
Ernesto Cofiño: Opus Dei Layman Declared “Venerable” by Pope Francis - https://www.ewtnvatican.com/articles/ernesto-cofino-opus-dei-layman-declared-venerable-by-pope-francis-1993  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Na stoku góry (talk • contribs) 10:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Growth chart

message: I think that this article could benefit from hyperlinking other Wikipedia pages when relevant Angelicality7 (talk) 20:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyperlinking 

message: What is the height and weight of normal Child 223.239.26.30 (talk) 14:38, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the height and weight of normal Child
Talk:Hyperimmunoglobulin E syndrome

message: i put the 'Expert-verify' tag in the article because the key information of what the normal levels of IgE are in ng/mL or kIU/L is missing. "> 10 times normal" is rather vague when neither this article nor Immunoglobulin E have a referenced value of the normal value or a normal range. Boud (talk) 22:38, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See Job 2.7--it was Satan, but by permission from God. Tarshizzle (talk) 23:07, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  how much IgE is considered to be hyper ? 

message: Pathopysiology needs work - this is a heterogeneous group of diseases with different genetic causes and biochemical mechanisms.
Currently Pathophysiology says: "Abnormal neutrophil chemotaxis due to decreased production of interferon gamma by T lymphocytes is thought to cause the disease.[6][unreliable medical source][non-primary source needed]"  Ref 6 is dated 2000; TYK2 gene was the first gene one found, in 2006 (only 2 published cases for that gene).  Now 5 genes are known, with different mechanisms and effects. EnviroHealth01 (talk) 21:29, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pathophysiology needs work 

message: Perhaps Autosomal Dominant HIES / HIES-AD / STAT3 / "Job's Syndrome" should be a separate page, which discusses its specific facial/dental/skeletal characteristics, leaving the HIES page to and differentiate between the 5 (or more) genetic plus any acquired causes and discuss any syndromic effects of chronically having IgE >2000. DIDS, PGM3 Deficiency, & Netherton Syndrome all already have specific pages.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by EnviroHealth01 (talk • contribs) 21:37, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move STAT3 / "Job's Syndrome" specifics to separate page? 

message: I can find no reference to to this, can we revert this change? Xp fun (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 23:13, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zaria Factor?
Talk:Integrated Management of Childhood Illness

message: This article needs to be substantially expanded. I disagree that this is a low importance topic. IMCI is the major way that WHO and others propose that we deal with worldwide child mortality. Hundreds of millions of dolars are invested in it yearly. A recent randomized trial published in Lancet showed that it may not work.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffreystringer (talk • contribs) 11:54, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation

message: In the article, it says: "In 2001, Andrew Wakefield published what he said were his concerns in the Journal of Adverse Drug and Toxicological Reviews".  However, I can't find any journal of that exact name, and the nearest cite I can find is to something published in 2000.
I can find this publication by Wakefield, dated 2000: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11212459/ , from a journal abbreviated Adverse Drug React Toxicol Rev which I think expands as Adverse Drug Reactions and Toxicological Reviews. 
Is this the the correct journal name? -- The Anome (talk) 15:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: yes.... -> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12119815_Measles_Mumps_Rubella_Vaccine_Through_a_Glass_Darkly Ckfasdf (talk) 00:23, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of journal 

message: Here it is: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/jcvi-issues-updated-advice-on-covid-19-vaccination-of-children-aged-12-to-15 I'm not sure how to mention it in the article. 85.169.195.108 (talk) 12:26, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  JCVI updated advice for vaccination of children aged 12 to 15 (september 2021)
Talk:Military occupations by the Soviet Union

message: Soviet Union never occupied anything  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.130.40.170 (talk) 19:31, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make me unsee that 

message: The article states that "1944–1946, Soviet troops occupied northern Norway".  This is inaccurate.  The Soviet troops only entered into the easternmost part of one of the three counties making up Northern Norway.  The Soviets didn't cross the river Tana.  Further, most of the Soviet troops pulled back around September/October 1945.  Many refer to the Soviet activity in Northern Norway not as "occupation", but "liberation", since Soviet troops fought against the Nazi occupiers.  
There were persons among the top ranking Soviet leadership who wanted the easternmost part of Finnmark to become a part of the Soviet, but it seems that Stalin respected that the whole of Norway should remain a part of the Western world.  
One iconic quote is from the liberation of Kirkenes on October 25, 1944, when four Soviet soldiers told a group of probably around four thousand Norwegians who were hiding from the warfare in a mining tunnel in Bjørnevatn: "You are free, you can hoist the Norwegian flag".  
Joreberg (talk) 15:10, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Northern Norway

message: Was Yugoslavia a satellite state? They joined the League of Neutral Nations, after all. 2A00:23C4:2401:6D00:D43A:54FC:605A:13B7 (talk) 16:34, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yugoslavia 

message: This is a page unbecoming of Wikipedia. It has been flagged as containing original research. It asserts easily demonstrable falsehoods (most notably the absurd notion that the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, and the Socialist People's Republic of Albania, constituted Soviet satellite states (a term which the article fails to define). The image, especially, should be removed, as it uses blatantly incorrect names (e.g. the "federal people's republic of Yugoslavia" and the "people's republic of albania"). Furthermore, even a cursory knowledge of history disproves these assertions as "Soviet satellite states", as the SFRY was the leading party in the NAM, and Albania was conspicuously stalinist in the 1970s, completely contrary to the political position of the USSR at that time.
I may not be a regular editor, but I could not merely stand by while these falsehoods are being asserted on an encyclopedia that so many people rely on for factual, vetted information. Please, some editor, address this. 67.183.18.31 (talk) 22:58, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page should be deleted, or massively revised.
Talk:Cognitive informatics

message: any idea who created this page?  So much of Wang's work is cited that it seems like Wang (or his direct students) may have set it up, which might violate wikipedia's prohibition of self-promotion and lack of notability/reliability of sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.8.158.107 (talk • contribs) 12:16, 17 October 2007
:Agreed. The citation list is a bit Wang-centric. Suggest trimming down the number of Wang citations, as the current volume of them is rather comical. Tolchocker (talk) 20:16, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: self-promotion?

message: The entire article is copied from http://www.igi-global.com/bookstore/TitleDetails.aspx?TitleId=801&DetailsType=Preface, text also used in some other sources by Wang. It may be that he has the copyright and will donateit to us, but the material would have to be completely rewritten in any case to be encyclopedic.  If anyone wants to deal with it, I'll email them the article so they can use the references.    DGG ( talk ) 02:56, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: copyvio
Talk:194 (number)

message: Because 2194 - 1 = 3×971×1553×11447×31817×1100876018364883721×13842607235828485645766393 does not have a prime factor being congruent to 1 modulo another. I can't find any even number > 194 that has this property. If m is an even number such that every group of order 2m - 1 is cyclic, then 2m - 1 cannot have any prime factor congruent to 1 modulo 3; in particular, if p is an odd prime factor of m, then 22p - 1 = (2p - 1)(2p + 1) cannot have any prime factor congruent to 1 modulo 3. I could not find such a p other than 11, 23 and 97. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 00:12, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not interesting enough to be mentioned in the article, but the only group of order 2<sup>194</sup> - 1 is cyclic
Talk:Ponseti method

message: Wikipedia is not an advertising opportunity for our favorite support groups.  Please remember that patients (and their family members) are perfectly capable of using an internet search engine to find online support groups.  External links in medical articles should direct readers to authoritative, encyclopedic information which is too extensive to be included in the article.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:33, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reminder
Talk:Kamen Rider Black RX (character)

message: Due to the fact that this page is lacking in information, I recommend that we remove this page and incorporate its meager data in the character page of Kamen Rider Black. That way we can establish the connection between them. Supaagekireddo 12:31, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I merged to Kamen Rider Black (character) because both pages are about Kotaro Minami. It does not make any sense to have the pages separate.--2601:140:8200:DE:3005:7302:9C2B:33D8 (talk) 22:44, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged
Talk:Sarcoma botryoides

message: At present, Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma redirects here. However, they are not the same thing. (I'm not well informed enough on the subject to write an article about it.) ProhibitOnions (T) 11:47, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma article needed

message: *https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/001510.htm
*
:Barbara (WVS) ✐  ✉  10:26, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Didier Berthod

message: I haven't placed much information yet on Didier as I haven't got a lot at hand - I just thought I would start the ball rolling and get an entry up as Didier is quite well known in the climing community. He has put up first ascents in Utah and elsewhere. He is not a personal friend so I thought he was a worthy subject for a wikipedia article.
: Definitely notable in rock climbing (was at a time the world's top 3 traditional climber). 78.18.228.191 (talk) 19:59, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: New article
Talk:209 (number)

message: Reference 7 is a duplicate of reference 6, which appears to be an unreliable source (zero GS citations, and one of the mirrors that GS finds is on viXra, generally a bad sign). Reference 8, to the OEIS, does not use the term that this article does; moreover, the OEIS indicates that Henry W. Gould studied this sequence decades earlier, so the term used in this article is unwarranted. XOR'easter (talk) 21:36, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, you'll need an admin to make those changes as it's now protected.  The Rambling Man (talk) 21:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

text: That's okay, don't worry.  The Rambling Man (talk) 22:22, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  But don't expect anyone else to find sources for you for material you want to add. If problems are identified with your sources then it's generally up to you to find better sources, especially if other editors don't think the material should be in the article. --NeilN talk to me 22:53, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Although you should expect those editors to have a civil discussion with you before slapping templates on your talk page and taking you to an "edit warring" noticeboard in order to get you blocked.  The Rambling Man (talk) 22:55, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

text: I lean toward that being sufficient if OEIS reports the sequence is "nice" or "core", but the name is not sourced, and may be a WP:BLP violation.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 08:44, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference issues 

message: *The first two sources (presently [6] and [7]) are clearly unreliable), and should not be used.
*The third (presently [8]) is a reliable source, but doesn't mention Smarandache, and OEIS doesn't consider the sequence "nice" (particularly notable or important.)  We also need a "name" field for the reference, and using what OEIS calls it would confuse readers.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 15:45, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the unreliable sources and the terminology derived from them.  I have no strong feeling about whether the fact should be included or not, though I generally think that "appearing early in a sequence the OEIS deems nice" is a good enough criterion, so if forced to choose, I would say that this item should be removed.  I looked through all the OEIS nice sequences for occurrences of 209, and the only one where 209 appears early enough to be at all noteworthy is : there are 209 distinct graphs on 7 or fewer unlabeled vertices. XOR'easter (talk) 18:57, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smarandache 

message: Pretty far out in the sequence, and (an implied project criterion) Harshad numbers are not rare.  Now that I've replaced the Mathworld source with OEIS, there can be no question that the sequence is somewhat notable.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 15:45, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Harshad numbers]] 

message: *No, we should not include the information about Harshad numbers or sums of consecutive powers. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Rott

message: I have removed the following text from this page:
"*ROTT, a heavy metal band from the bay area, California. They have released an album called "Expectations of Idiots", it was copyrighten and released in 2005. This band is currently working on a second album, and they play shows regularly. Their website is www.rott.ws, and their myspace is www.myspace.com/r0tt. "
Regardless of whether the band in question warrant an article on Wikipedia, this is not the place for this information, which in any case reads like an advertisement. If you feel the band are notable, please start a separate article for them.
IanCR 12:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ROTT

message: A Death Metal Band from Los Angeles, Watts, California.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DMZ84 (talk • contribs) 21:14, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ROTT (L.A.)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Space Hijackers

message: Personally I think that the page is a useful point of reference, I came here from the Circle Line Party entry and would have been left wanting without it.  I do not believe it is invalid "becuase it has not been modified since 2003" - in fact there is an argument that if it has not been modified then it is a perfect article.  It gives useful links to find out more and as such I feel it should be left intact.
I second the vote to bring back the article, as it at least seems relevant enough to have an article, even if it's content is not amazing.  158.104.216.48 04:27, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Aperture Science

message: The part about GLaDOS killing every employee is wrong. At the end of the game, when you have to kill her, she tells you the morals piece ball thing that was attached to her was installed after she flooding the facility with neurotoxin. Could somebody change that? I'm not sure how to go about editing this.
Actually, I don't believe this page (the Ap Sci, Inc.) one needs to exist.  It is presently only based on in-universe information, and there's not much that is known about it otherwise.  My suggestion:
*First, the web site access details are not needed.  This is game guide type material.  We can explain information about Ap Sci based on using that web site access, but how to get there is beyond the scope of WP.
*At the present time, it makes sense to include, as a subsection to the plot, a section about Ap Sci, and how it relates to other parts of the HL universe (including the Boralis, etc.)  Unlike the rest of the plot section, this section should be wrapped with spoiler tags since it gives away information about a completely different game (Ep2).  
*Should Ep3 come out and a lot more can be learned about Ap Sci it may warrant its own article.  However, do note that it would need more out-of-universe references to support it; the current article on Black Mesa is pretty poor in any outside detail though given how it extends across many games, it does need a separate one though not as large.
--MASEM 12:48, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would support a merge of this article into Portal article. --Voidvector 13:03, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging discussion

message: What do you all think of the new content? This is actually my first wiki, so i have high hopes for this. 12:14, 14 February 2010Mastado  —Preceding undated comment added 16:25, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This won't work. We already have a section on Aprature on the Portal article as well as at Locations in the Half-Life series, so repeating the primary information is not good enough. We need to have criticism and reception information as well as information about the setting's development to break out a new article from what is already there. Duplicating the fictional timeline from the website/game is not appropriate for WP. --MASEM (t) 16:40, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: New Page Content
Talk:Hippocratic bench

message: Do we have any information on the rough period when Hippocrates invented this bench? The reason I ask is because I am wondering what it might be relative to the invention of another device which he may have also invented. This history of inversion article makes this claim:
:400 BC: Hippocrates, the Father of Medicine, hoists up a patient on a ladder with a series of ropes and pulleys to harness the force gravity in an effort to stretch his patients and relieve their ailments.
There is a picture of this here. I am looking for other ways to confirm the information. But it makes me wonder: depending on when these therapeutic traction approaches were invented, could one have inspired the other? Knowing which came first via finding out the date of the bench (assuming the 400bc date for the ladder is right) would be critical. I am not sure what to call this other device (Hippocratic ladder?). Y12J (talk) 01:36, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of invention

message: I found this article via reddit and am concerned that the only "references" that i can find to this treatment are chiropractic clinics trying to sell this stuff, with studies pointing both ways. MikeTango (talk) 16:16, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  VAX-D
Talk:Shanghai Library

message: Per Emporis, this library is taller than the W. E. B. Du Bois Library which is cited on various places in Wikipedia as being the world's tallest. Clearly then the Du Bois is not (it *is* to my knowledge the US's tallest), but I have no evidence that this one is in fact the tallest. Am marking it as such for now. ∈ntroppie 10:38, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: See W. E. B. Du Bois Library  Astronaut (talk) 01:18, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly the tallest library in the world 

message: the web dubois tower is much taller at 352 feet tall and 26 stories tall  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cymba84 (talk • contribs) 01:00, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: See W. E. B. Du Bois Library  Astronaut (talk) 01:18, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: not the tallest library the world

message: Holy mackarel... would someone please goelocate it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.1.116.121 (talk) 09:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  found the link... but can't handle chinese windows:
http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&q=1555%2C%20Huai%20Hai%20Zhong%20Lu%20(Central%20Huai%20Hai%20Road)%2C%20200031%2C%20Shanghai&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wl 218.1.116.121 (talk) 09:28, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  geo loc =

message: In which district is the main library building? Would be nice to add a corresponding geography category. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:41, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  District? 

message: Shanghai library has compiled 130 volumes of ancient books (including books about 180 thousand copies), 160 thousand (of which 2 thousand copies)，the Ming and Qing Dynasties in modern letters 118 thousand. Is it only me who doesn't understand this, or is it the wording? Can somebody please rephrase this section? Thank you. --Stilfehler (talk) 14:37, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncomprehensible wording
Talk:Internal decapitation

message: The section on people who have survived this is longer than the actual article. It also needs a cleanup. If nobody objects, I'll do it in the next week or so.
Osakadave (talk) 21:24, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Survivors

message: Does anyone have any actual information on Joseph Brodie? Someone added him to the list of internal decapitation survivors, but I can't find any definite answers to whether or not he actually was.
I'm assuming that this Joseph Brodie is the one the anonymous contributor meant, and in 1994 a Joseph R. Brodie was indeed in a skiing accident that "caused Joseph to suffer life-threatening injuries" -- but there's no mention of what kind of injuries, or if it's even the same Joseph Brodie.
So... more information needed. -- Erik Siers (talk) 00:54, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joseph Brodie
Talk:Kirschner wire

message: Deleted 'basically' from opening sentence - needless filler that has no place in a formal description  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.144.193 (talk) 16:09, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "K wire" vs "K-wire" 