lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Saint Joseph Central Catholic High School (Fremont, Ohio)

message: Listing all league and individual state titles is not appropriate for this article. These kinds of articles are about the school, not every detail about the school and definitely not just about the athletics program. The article should give a thorough, but general, overview of the entire school. Even without the league and individual titles, athletics still currently takes up half of the article. What about the curriculum? Other activities beside sports? Arts? Demographics? Other accomplishments besides athletics? Please become familiar with the article guidelines for school articles, as well as policies such as WP:SCOPE and WP:TOPIC, along with WP:FANCRUFT. While it's certainly acceptable to summarize the many individual and league titles the school has won, listing each of them overwhelms the article, which already has a significant amount of lists. That would also require the athletics section being converted to prose instead of lists. --JonRidinger (talk) 02:33, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep. A list of sports offered isn't appropriate, nor are sports accomplishments at the sub-State level. In other words, I don't see any "Notable state finshes[sic]" that qualify. The league memberships can easily fit in a sentence. So, at this point there is one sentence of sports content that can remain. tedder (talk) 20:51, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  League titles and individual state titles
Talk:Elmdale, Kansas

message: Please review the following:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
• Sbmeirow • Talk •  15:16, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Tips Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Roz Kelly

message: What's with the "dunkin arrow" references? Smells like vandalism. Or just random nonsense. Anyone know what that's about? -LafongLafong (talk) 03:49, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ain't you never heard o' Pinky Dunkin' Arrow?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.220.41.194 (talk) 22:41, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

text: It's just vandalism by 98.220.41.194, unfortunately, it has been replicated on many of the sites that replicate Wiki information, as this Google search shows. Robman94 (talk) 16:51, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dunkin Arrow?

message: Ms. Kelly's appearance on the Jenny Jones Show was an uncomfortable moment.  Jones, seemed ill-prepared, and Kelly had to repeat that she was not a cast regular, but had done a couple of scenes. Jones kept pushing the "tell me about all the great moments," and Kelly kept telling her that she came in, did her scenes, and left.  I felt sorry for Kelly. ClevelandExPat (talk) 16:14, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jenny Jones Show
Talk:Rua Tipoki

message: * Some think he captained  Bay of Plenty in 2004 - but he simply "played a major role" in the victory"
* In fact, it was Wayne Ormond who was captain.
Good spotting 27.252.42.65! - this incorrect "fact" has been in this article since 2006 , so be aware that there's many references on the net that have used Wikipedia as a source. Snori (talk) 17:41, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Ranfurly Shield?
Talk:Rubén Díaz Sr.

message: Given that his name is properly written "Rubén Díaz", I propose the article be renamed (with a redirect from the current non-accented name per WP:Proper names.)  —EqualRights (talk) 03:38, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done (though I'm not sure that Ruben Diaz should continue to redirect to this article rather than the Rubén Díaz disambiguation page...) —EqualRights (talk) 15:20, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

text: I did indeed end up changing the redirect to the disambiguation page —EqualRights (talk) 23:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to Rubén Díaz 

message: The article gives undue weight towards his positions on same-sex marriage and abortion and away from his positions on other issues. --Mr. Guye (talk) 00:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The article references sources. Perhaps it is he who gives undue weight to those issues.--The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 14:36, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue weight
Talk:Grimm–Sommerfeld rule

message: The body of this article says only this:
:: The Grimm-Sommerfeld rule applies for the bond lengths: If the sum of the atomic number is the same, the interatomic distances are the same.
It links to Grimm, which is of course a disambiguation page, then to Sommerfeld, which is also a disambiguation page, then to bond, which is a disambiguation page that begins with stuff about finance (a bond is a debt security).  At the word lengths, I'm thinking maybe if a bond that I buy today matures X years from now, then X is the "bond length", but I read on, and find it seems to be about the chemical bond.  If I'm right in so surmising, the link should be structured thus: bond.  And if I'm wrong, it still probably should not link to the "bond" disambiguation page.  I think it should start by saying the rule is about the chemical bond, so that the lay reader who comes here via special:random will know first whether it's on a subject he or she is interested in, and then say what it says.  Now, the sum is the same as what??  Did it mean the sums (plural) are (plural) the same, meaning the same as each other?  If so, it should be plural.  Furthermore, a bit more context-setting should precede this sentence: saying just which sums of which atomic numbers, etc., before saying their the same as something.  Since all these points are perfectly obvious, whoever wrote this must have spent about ten seconds on it.  How can anyone link to "bond" without expecting that it will be a disambiguation page? Michael Hardy 20:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I have rewritten this article to state the versions of the rule in use. Axiosaurus (talk) 13:51, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite Jan 2013
Talk:Rubens de Falco

message: "De Falco's last television appearance as an actor came in 1994". This is certainly not true as he appeared in the 2004 version of "A Escrava Isaura" as Almeida. Bagunceiro (talk) 19:29, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Television Appearance 

message: "He was homosexual, unmarried, and had no children.": I replaced this rude sentence (made without any reference or citation) with the most elegant phrase "He was not married and left no descendants".
The fact was that Rubem de Falco died and left no children, if he was or wasn't homosexual is not our matter of concern and adds no value to this article. The only notability of the man was regarding his various TV and cinema works, not what he did under bed sheets. --Homem de Letras (talk) 19:55, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced information removed
Talk:Rüdiger Sünner

message: As it says in the tag, it has been suggested that this article or section be merged with Schwarze Sonne (book) and Schwarze Sonne (film), see the afd: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rüdiger Sünner. Zara1709 14:02, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Josip Stadler

message: This entire section is an enormous reach. It details extensively crimes against the Serb population....on a biography page? Stadler's name is mentioned once in the first paragraph, otherwise it is just a description of events during the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, which have nothing to do with the biography of Stadler. It literally mentions the Austro-Hungarian goverment encouraging riots--again, what does this have to do with Stadler? Mentions of assaults, razing buildings, pillaging--again, no mention of what this has to do with Stadler. Then "later that night" some agreement is reached with numerous people--Stadler's name is finally included--but with no mention of how the earlier events were Stadler's responsibility. Then the second paragraph continues to discuss what the city government did--again, with no mention of Stadler.
This reads like someone has a personal agenda that they are determined to push. I've read the sources and Stadler did not approve of  "pogroms". There is an big attempt to put him at fault for a meeting between the government and police. A very big reach. 
Right after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, the Austro-Hungarian government encouraged anti-serb riots in Sarajevo, in which Serb civillians were assaulted, numerous houses, Serbian Orthodox churches, schools, shops and institutions owned by Serbs were razed or pillaged. Leading to divisions unprecedented in the city's history. Later that night, an agreement was reached between the provincial government of Bosnia and Herzegovina led by Oskar Potiorek, Sarajevo city police and Štadler with his assistant Ivan Šarić to eradicate the "subversive elements of this land."
The city government issued a proclamation and invited population of Sarajevo to "fulfill their holy duty and clean their city of the shame through eradication of the subversive elements." It was printed on the posters which were distributed and displayed over the city during that night and tomorrow early morning, which signaled the continuation of the pogrom. Two Serbs were killed on the first day of the demonstrations, and many were attacked, while numerous houses, shops and institutions owned by Serbs were razed or pillaged. 
If we are going to include any religious leader as "inciting" riots, then why are the pages of Serbian Orthodox priests from the 1990s Bosnia-Herzegovina not similarly filled with descriptions of crimes committed against Bosniaks and Croats and how the Orthodox priests contributed to them? Jesuislafete (talk) 22:13, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role in "anti-Serb pogrom" 

message: https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%88%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BF_%D0%A8%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%80 212.200.65.248 (talk) 10:37, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link
Talk:R. Hollis Gause

message: I looked - the guy is legit, but there is not a lot of data on him.  He may not meet the WP:BIO guidelines.
--Juda S. Engelmayer (talk) 22:15, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Found what I could 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved (non-admin closure)  ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 22:18, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Rufus Hollis Gause →  – This seems to have been the name he was published under/known by. Should not be moved until AFD concludes. Jahaza (talk) 22:04, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 January 2023
Talk:Rufus Hound

message: 17.07.08 - Rufus Hound has in truth been described by Stephen Fry as "The rich man's Simon Pegg". The previous entry was a hoax.
Why does this article say "He has likely been described"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.24.171.88 (talk) 23:12, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I wondered that too. I move that the sentence is scratched. 217.155.138.250 (talk) 20:40, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Probabilities inappropriate - hard facts please 

message: ...as written by the subject or his agent.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.211.97.199 (talk) 22:13, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like a quirky biography 

message: Needs an update, surely the most notable ommission being Hounded, the children's sci-fi comedy series presumably written and designed by him  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.5.89.149 (talk) 10:14, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Careers section 

message: Apparently rufus has not appeared on the one show, but this says he has.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.246.201.101 (talk) 21:17, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Specifically, he joked on You Have Been Watching that the show's researchers must have got that from Wikipedia, as it wasn't true. As it's unsourced, I'll remove it. --McGeddon (talk) 22:37, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The One Show 

message: Not sure if I'm right in this but I just removed;
"As a live comedian he seems to MC, most notably at Komedia in Brighton where he lives. He has also worked for Merrill Lynch as an MC at corporate presentations. He was at the Best of the Fest, Brighton Comedy Festival on October 16th 2009 and was shockingly bad, dying an agonising death in front of a large audience. Homophobic, misogynistic, nasty and crude. Don't go and see him live."
I removed the entire paragraph - the latter half because it is not encyclopaedic and the beginning because it isn't quoting sources - even though it reads true I wasn't sure if it was put in by the same person who added the abuse.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lanzarotemaps (talk • contribs) 22:58, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abusive comments removed 

message: Is being "the blue team captain... dressing up as Cheryle Cole" really the most outstading encyclopedic facts about Hound? 132.185.240.122 (talk) 17:15, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really? 

message: The Express is tabloid gossip, it's not a source for an encyclopedia. If there is valid material to be added it will be reported in valid, reputable sources. Mramoeba (talk) 19:04, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: In future do not edit other editors' comments or section heading to change its meaning, see here The section is regarding the Daily Express as a source. Please also refrain from questioning the integrity of fellow editors without foundation Mramoeba (talk) 05:40, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daily Express 

message: Appeared on the Weakest Link 2024 Percy2345 (talk) 21:13, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Weakest link
Talk:Rufus Edmisten

message: There is only one source listed in the entire article.  For some reason it appears that a hit and run editor decided to delete the only portion of the article with a source (and it seems to be a credible source).  The remainder of the article is completely unsourced with some significant redundancy. In fact, much of the article reads like a PR blurb.  It doesn't have an appropriate tone for an encyclopedia article.  
I will attempt some basic cleanup, but sources will still need to be added.  Some of the basic information may not require extensive inline references, but specific claims such as delivering the subpoena need to be sourced.  I removed specifics about the organizations Edmisten seems to have been involved with.  Basic information may be appropriate here, but details about those organizations would fit better under an article on those organizations (assuming they are important enough to merit articles).  This article should remain focused on Edmisten.  I also removed the Secretary of State wikilink - North Carolina Secretary of State is wikilinked in the first line and is a much more appropriate link for this article.
I'm sure this still needs work, but it is marked as low priority so it may be a while.  LUxlii (talk) 17:22, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources and tone issues
Talk:Kabyle

message: ==Untitled==
This is very imprecise, not to write inexact. The town was, at most, re-established during the Early Hellenistic era. Maybe 'Hellenistic settlement' is a better alternative, 
although it does not account for the very long history of the site.Ivan Marinov (talk) 11:51, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancient Greek colony 

message: This is very imprecise, not to write inexact. The town was, at most, re-established during the Early Hellenistic era. Maybe 'Hellenistic settlement' is a better alternative, 
although it does not account for the very long history of the site.Ivan Marinov (talk) 11:51, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Maurice Delafosse

message: I first came upon Delafosse's work when writing a thesis regarding the Serer people back in the 1990s, and I was shocked when I came upon Delafosse's work and falsehoods not supported by any credible scholar. In 2012, I was editing the Sundiata Keita (see my clean notes, and final edit ) when I came upon more of Delafosse's falsehoods and fabrication of West African genealogies and history. I wanted to find out what other credible authors said about his work especially relating to West African history and genealogies, as I've never taken him serious. As noted in my notes and edits all those years ago, which I see has been used in the Ghana Empire article, he was heavily criticised by historians as stated in my notes below:
:Delafosse merely linked different legends (i.e. the Tautain story etc.) and prescribed Diara Kanté (1180) as the father of Soumaoro, in order to link the Sossos to the Diarisso Dynasty of Kaniaga (Jarisso). He also failed to give sources as to how he arrived to that conclusion and the genealogy he created. Monteil describes his work as "unacceptable". The African Studies Association describe it as "...too creative to be useful to historians". See:
:*African Studies Association, History in Africa, Volume 11, African Studies Association., 1984, the University of Michigan, pp 42-51
:*Monteil, Charles, Fin de siècle à Médine (1898-1899), Bulletin de l'lFAN, vol. 28, série B, n° 1-2, 1966, p 166
:*Monteil, Charles, La légende officielle de Soundiata, fondateur de l'empire manding, Bulletin du Comité  d'Etudes historiques et scientifiques de l 'AOF, tome VIII, n° 2, 1924.
:*Robert Cornevin, Histoire de l'Afrique, Tome I : des origines au XVIe siècle (Paris, 1962), 347-48,(ref. to Delafosse in Haut-Sénégal-Niger vol.1, pp 256-257)
:*Crowder, Michael, West Africa: an introduction to its history, Longman, 1977, p 31 (based on Delafosse's work)
:*Delafosse, Maurice, Haut-Sénégal-Niger: Le Pays, les Peuples, les Langues; l'Histoire; les Civilizations. vols. 1-3, Paris: Émile Larose (1912), (editors: Marie François Joseph Clozel)
Since this man's work is being cited in many West African medieval history and genealogies which were based on his own psedo history, I believe a section showing critism of his work is necessary. Tamsier (talk) 12:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critism section may be necessary
Talk:Rupiah Banda

message: I initially had the article say he was Foreign Minister from 1975 to 1976, but 1976 was recently changed to 1978. No really good source seems to exist on the Internet about this, but in this interview he seems to refer to it as lasting only one year: "All that year, I was travelling constantly to all parts trying to broker a ceasefire for peace in Angola." What source does User:Perspicacite base the 1978 date on? Everyking 08:38, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am now almost certain that 1976 is the correct date, based on several sources I've found mentioning Siteke Mwale as Foreign Minister in 1976, so I am going to change the date. None of the sources are really any good for this article, since they don't mention Banda himself,honestly, but they certainly confirm that Banda could not have remained FM until 1978. The sources include such things as a visit by Mwale as FM to Romania in Nov. 1976, and a quote from Mwale on Google Books in which he expresses condolences on the death of Mao (Sept. 1976). I have excluded sources such as Geocities websites and Rulers.org (which also give 1976). Everyking 07:06, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Foreign Minister from

message: this is rather bizarre:
CNN:
:"In Zambia last year, journalist Chansa Kabwela sent photographs of a woman giving birth on the street outside a major hospital (where she had been refused admission) to the president's office, hoping he would look into why this had happened.
:Instead, the president, Rupiah Banda, ordered the journalist prosecuted for promoting pornography. She was later acquitted."
Possibly add this to the article? Burtthompson (talk) 21:08, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Inappropriate behavior
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Plot of Naruto: Shippūden

message: Keep.  I don't see any copyright violation at all.  If this article is removed, might as well remove all Shakespeare plot summary and forbid anyone talking about plots of any movie/book/TV show that he/she had seen.  The plot summary on the other hand allows me to enjoy the show more and indirectly adds value to the show.  Good job in creating this article.Wonster 21:09, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Russ Rhea

message: There are COI issues as subject of the article made numerous substantial edits himself.  Article history also shows the author made edits to the Hahn, Texas Communications page that Reah authored.  There is no question in  my mind re conflict of interest issues here. 4804BT (talk) 01:49, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of Interest

message: There is no evidence of true Notability under Wikipedia standards.  A fine person no doubt, but a local journalist-turned-PR advocate in one town is not necessarily notable.  Show evidence of notability. 4804BT (talk) 01:49, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Only three citations, ONE OF WHICH is his own biography on his own created web site.         
I would welcome the author to provide fixes, but even that will not clear up the COI issues.  I'd be glad to help or offer suggestions.  Contact me on my talk page.  4804BT (talk) 04:29, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of citations

message: * Suggest perhaps you get other editors to give their opinions about the Hahn Texas deletion and/or about possible edits.  They may or may not agree with me.  Or ask for a third-party opinion or peer review WP:REVIEW.   4804BT (talk) 02:37, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: By the way - Other Opinions Count, Too

message: Page has no links from within Wikipedia.  It is also the only link to Hahn, Texas Communications and this site appears to have been written for the purpose of providing Hahn Texas with a link. Therefore Hahn Texas has no links either.  See also Hahn, Texas Communications Talk Page  4804BT (talk) 01:49, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Orphan
Talk:Russ Wilcox

message: I agree with Smithy501 that the "personal life" section is inappropriate. The source for the marriage is a public record, not to be used for a BLP per WP:BLPPRIMARY. Sourcing regarding the son is somewhat more ambiguous, but ultimately I don't think either meets Wikipedia's standards of reliability. A Google News search didn't find any better references discussing Wilcox' family. Thus I'll remove that section again; it's irrelevant to what Wilcox is known for, and we should err on the side of privacy. Huon (talk) 01:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand regarding the marriage, but can't agree on the son, it's cited by two reliable sources. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:13, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see that 11v11.com has the editorial oversight required of a reliable source; corbytownfc.co.uk is a club's own website, a primary source, not third-party coverage. Huon (talk) 02:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal life
Talk:Russell Allen

message: Just noticed the quote, "He also was a backup singer in Dream Theater in their early years (1991)."  Is this true?  Google only showed a bunch of quotes from Wikipedia, and that self-referencing didn't prove anything.
I'm putting Citation Needed unless someone can provide one. Irishnightwish (talk) 17:32, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Backup singer for DT?