lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Polly Put the Kettle On

message: If anyone knows the origins of this nursery rhyme, it would be nice to include some bacjground. Mike 7 07:01, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Origins

message: The In Popular Culture section might actually be useful if it was relevant to the article topic. 175.38.228.117 (talk) 07:05, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: In Popular Culture
Talk:Baker River (Washington)

message: Is it Picket Creek and Pass Creek, or is it "Picket Pass Creek"? Shannon1talk contribs 02:59, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Picket Creek and Pass Creek. I wrote more but somehow lost the text before saving. Got the names via the "GNIS in Google Map" link on the GNIS page for Baker River... zoomed in and view "Topo". Pfly (talk) 09:05, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picket Creek? 
Talk:Microgaming

message: This article has seen a strange history of promotion, undisclosed paid editing and sock puppetry. The following indefinitely blocked spam-only accounts have edited this article in the past:
*
*
*
*
*
The article topic, until revision 912920942, was "icroaming oftware Systems Ltd", founded in 19, before a user with the fitting name "" rewrote it to today's version and removed the  tag.
I have blocked the user, who I now consider to be part of the above list, and re-added the tag. The article has not been relieved of its main issue: Promotional speech. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:57, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A history of promotion
Talk:Okanogan River

message: :It drains a scenic plateau region called the Okanogan Country east of the Cascade Range and north and west of the Columbia, and also the Okanagan Valley of British Columbia - which is also known as the Okanagan Country, but more usually as "the Okanagan".
Well, yes, it's Interior Plateau I guess, whatever the landform is called around there, i.e. stateside, I guess Columbia Plateau; a lot of Okanogan County is Okanagan Highland, though - in fact that term was coined by a Washington geographer, cited by Holland, who extended the application into BC (I use the 'a' spelling because most of it's in BC, same reason as this article has the 'o' spelling, most of it's in WA).  I added the paranthetical bit about Okanagan Country/Okanagan - I hadn't realized Americans also used the "Country" appellation, over "County" which seems much more typically American...works for me...ask any Siylx, they'll tell you the Okanagan Country has been partitioned.... ;-).  Some of the county includes some of the Okanagan Range and also the sliver of Thompson Plateau between the Similkameen and Okanogan River....Skookum1 (talk) 06:30, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Okanogan Country/Okanagan Country
Talk:Dnipro launch vehicle/Answer to an unrelated question, no value to the rest of discussion

message: I object to the speedy deletion, but since I created the page, I will not remove the speedy-tl leaving this to a discretion of an admin --Irpen 06:09, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please answer on your user talk page. The context of this page has been moved there. --KPbIC 06:14, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I will answer here since this is the issue of a wider interest. --Irpen 06:53, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Toutle River

message: I noticed the back and forth editing on whether this photo, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Toutle_River_in_flood.jpg, was taken just before or just after the eruption of Mt St Helens. It looks to me like it must have been taken after, what with all the sediment and trees in the water. But then again, what do I know? I did try to check the source links given on the image's description page to confirm the May 1, 1980 date, and perhaps to see if there might have been some vagueness about the date at the US Army source site. But all three links given are dead. The image was uploaded over two years ago. It says May 1, 1980, but is there any way to verify that? Pfly (talk) 06:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed this too but have not yet found the answer. Finetooth (talk) 19:22, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that the Corps is moving its Digital Visual Library but that the move is incomplete. Here is the image data, but the date taken is blank.Finetooth (talk) 19:52, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo prior to or just after St Helens eruption
Talk:White River (Puyallup River)

message: That would make the whole article a lot more useful to readers and casual visitors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.84.204.10 (talk) 23:21, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we get a map? 

message: The Lake Tapps article says power is no longer generated, since 1995. It isn't clear whether the water still goes through an inactive powerhouse or just a waterway. Either way, if the Lake Tapps article is right, then this article is at least misleading to mention "turbines of the Dieringer Powerhouse" without saying that the "powerhouse" is powerless. Art LaPella (talk) 17:12, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dieringer Powerhouse 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of Xbox 360 games without region encoding

message: For everyone complaining about not knowing what games they can buy for their import 360's, play-asia maintains an accurate and up to date list on their website.
So much for Wikipedia being useful to me, if they remove the content I use.  How disappointing.  deKay
This was very useful to me. I have a NTSC-J console and this list helps me figure which games I can use. There a few such lists on the internet but this one has proved to be the most comprehensive and the most reliable. A lot of research went into this and those who would claim it isn't legitimate research would probably also like to tell me what constitutes Art. It hurts noone. It is, at least to me, a valuable point of reference, and isn't that the point? PNutHed 19:41, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A cookbook is useful.  it doesn't mean that it belongs in an encyclopedia.  See WP:NOT.  If you believe the dletion was improper, bring it up on Wikipedia:Deletion review. Ace of Sevens 02:14, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I nominated it.  The main reason was I saw how games kept being changed from compatible to not not and back.  i figured there's no way it's accurate and it's not liek we can site sources.  I wish Microsoft were paying me off to nominate articles. Again, if you have a problem, bring it up at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Ace of Sevens 04:39, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:North River (Washington)

message: This page said the North River was a tributary of the Willapa River, as did List of rivers of Washington. The USGS and other sources say the North River empties into Willapa Bay not the Willapa River, so I changed the pages to say so. This schematic map from the USGS shows the relationship clearly. Pfly (talk) 17:02, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a tributary of the Willapa River 
Talk:Animas River

message: Section title about says it all.  A map of the river's course is needed.  It'd be nice if it included an outline of the watershed as well. Unschool 05:27, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map Needed
Wikipedia talk:Episode summaries

message: This page was the subject of an MfD discussion closed on 2 November 2006.  The result was no consensus, but tag as essay. Xoloz 14:09, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: MfD Result Notice

message: Episode summaries could fall under this sentence in Wikipedia:No original research:
In some cases, where an article (1) makes descriptive claims the accuracy of which is easily verifiable by any reasonable adult without specialist knowledge, and (2) makes no analytic, synthetic, interpretive, or evaluative claims, a Wikipedia article may be based entirely on primary sources (examples would include apple pie or current events), but these are exceptions. CG 07:35, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So under this clause, I can write an article on the tree outside my window. Anyone can walk up to that tree and verify it, as long as i make no interpretive claims, right? Episode summaries are an interpretation of the episode anyway. -- Chris chat edits essays 18:52, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: They don't violate original research

message: Hell no. This has nothing to do with notability. This is a clarification page that states that episode summaries are under the same rules as other articles. -- Chris chat edits essays 17:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Solar eclipse of August 11, 1999

message: I saw this eclipse. Any chance a userbox could be created that says "I saw the 1999 eclipse"?--Energman 11:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Userbox 

message: Does anyone have a newer picture? I think the reunion of Germany took place in 1990... 194.94.240.61 (talk) 13:06, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, I never really looked close at them. The source comes from NASA, and I'd not expect old astronomical events to be updated for political boundaries. Tom Ruen (talk) 02:18, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globe 

message: The caption of the picture of the Romanian banknote reads...
"Special 2,000 Romanian leu paper made for the 1999 total eclipse of the sun, showing the eclipse path over the nation map."
I don't understand what the relevance of "paper" in this caption is, not least as the banknote is polymer (plastic).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.111.162.127 (talk) 09:46, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romanian Banknote 

message: The two citations
>KryssTal - Eclipse in Cornwall (UK)—totality not seen but scene photographed
>The 1999 Eclipse in England
Actually lead to the same website while being listed separately under different names in the sources  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.160.112.245 (talk) 18:42, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've deleted the second of the two links to the website. Only one link remains now.TowardsTheLight (talk) 21:11, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicate Citations
Talk:Rio Ruidoso

message: As I was expanding the article I wasn't quite sure if the source of the river should be the point at which the north fork and south fork of the two rivers combine, or if it should be at the the longest fork, or the highest fork. Perhaps someone can clarify that. At the moment, I put the coordinates for the source at the point where the north and south forks combine. Martylunsford (talk) 22:49, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: River Source
Talk:Richard Meux Benson

message: I plan to put this article into sections and add to the info that is already there.--§Sir James Paul<<--wikiholic§ 01:50, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  My future improvements 

message: There are now images of Richard Meux Benson in Wikimedia, category: Richard Meux Benson.Drbones1950 (talk) 20:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image Available
Talk:Eastern Catholic Community in Hawaii

message: This page used to have a number of links to articles about the priests and churches associated with the community. Furthermore, this edit deleted the Diocese of Honolulu category, which I find extremely relevant, and deleted all text about the relation of this community to the diocese. Bishop Silva has some authority over this community, even if it is a deputized authority from the eparchy of St. Nicholas. Finally, last I knew it was the accepted style in articles on Hawaii to use the okina where appropriate. Could the editor justify these changes? Gimmetrow 18:24, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is about Eastern Catholiocs in Hawaii – not the Roman Catholic Diocese of Honolulu or its Bishop. Neither is it about the internal politics between Fr. Hal and the Chancery of his Roman Catholic ordinary.  Those matters are their affair and have nothing whatsoever to do with us.  Our ordinary is and remains Bishop Richard of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Eparchy of Saint Nicholas.  We are a mission parish of that Eparchy and as such our community is Eastern Catholic and content on this page, including links, should reflect that fact.  Mar Isaac 18:48, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have restored the links while preserving your content as best I could. This is not about chancery politics. It is located in Hawaii and should be accessible from and link to the obvious place one would go to find info about Catholics in Hawaii. A See also link does not imply it is a part of the diocese. Gimmetrow 19:09, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikilinks 
Talk:Hutchinson River

message: Perhaps, as a graduate of all six years at Hutchinson Elementary School, I've no more claim of wisdom abt the lady's fate than others. Nevertheless, projecting "murder" into the ignorant nocturnal clashes of savage colonizers and colonized is, shall we say, an undertaking immune to legal analysis of culpabilities in the state of nature. I'm certain beyond a reasonable doubt that some of your ancestors and mine killed the other (probably in both directions), but it's ridiculous to pretend to settle those scores, tho fanatics  of opposite stripes pretend to know how.--JerzyA (talk) 22:06, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demise of Anne Hutchinson -- res ipse loq.
Talk:Apalachicola River

message: I believe the river is a Blackwater river but am reluctant to put it in the article without being positive. Does anyone know? Pollinator 02:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Blackwater?

message: I added a map and removed the "map needed" tag. Seeing it now at 300px wide I realize the linework ought to be a little thicker. I'll improve it when I get the chance. Pfly 21:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Map improved. Pfly 23:48, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Map
Template talk:Phoenix Suns roster

message: Hedo Türkoğlu should not be listed as a member of the Phoenix Suns as he is still with the Toronto Raptors. No trades have been made. Drsmith9 (talk) 16:21, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turkoglu 

message: Near Garret Siler's part for university, his university (Augusta State University) ended up having an * on the end of its name. Can you explain why it's there and how I can fix it. - AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 00:34, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Augusta State*
Talk:Black Warrior River

message: Hydroelectric power is found in the Wikipedia, so use it.
Use simple words like "about" instead of polysyllabic words like "approximately".
There is only one Tuscaloosa County in the world, so use it. 
Inland waterway is also in the Wikipedia, so use that. There is no need to use long and confusing phrases like "inland navigation".
98.81.11.27 (talk) 03:20, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simplify the convoluted language! 

message: I was at UA in the early 70s and remember that this river could be set on fire with a match.  Student activism was a large part of the  clean-up forced on a paper mill that was causing this pollution.  Those  days of young people getting things done are very significant and I hope somebody can write a good addendum to the article about it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.211.86.121 (talk) 05:34, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, there should be more information about the controversy due to all the pollution dumped into this river. There's a lot of important information on that online now, and it could really improve the contents of this page. There's not any mention of it,  really.Lightning1115 (talk) 03:33, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed section on 70s River Activism
Talk:Mobile River

message: I modified the article's statement about the rank of the Mobile's drainage basin.  Before my change it said simply "Its drainage basin is the fourth-largest in the United States."  My modified statement is "Its drainage basin is the fourth-largest of primary stream drainage basins entirely in the United States."  There are many more than three drainage basins entirely or partially in the US that are larger than the Mobile's, there are many more than three drainage basins entirely in the US that are larger than the Mobile's, and there are many more than three drainage basins of primary streams entirely or partially in the US that are larger than the Mobile's.  But there may not be more than three drainage basins of primary streams entirely in the US that are larger than the Mobile's.  In fact I've only been able to identify two -- those of the Kuskokwim and Brazos.  So my modified wording may not be accurate either, but it's at least possible. Oelrich (talk) 15:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, this page lists some rivers by drainage basin size. It puts the Mobile at 44,600 sqmi. The Brazos and Kuskokwim are larger. And it cites the Atchafalaya River as including the drainage basin of the Red River (Mississippi watershed), since most of the Red empties into the Atchafalaya instead of the Mississppi. The Atchafalaya empties directly into the sea. If that counts, the draiange basin of the Atchafalaya-Red is 95,100 sqmi. Other than those, I can't see any others larger than the Mobile. The portion of the Colorado River basin in Mexico is so small it seems almost unfair to disqualify it. And the Mississippi would count if you didn't include the Missouri! But oh well. Anyway, I suppose that USGS page could be used as a reference source for this claim, even if it is not stated explicitly. Also I assume by "primary river" you mean one that empties into the sea. Perhaps that should be said more clearly? Pfly (talk) 16:59, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drainage basin rank 
Talk:Polylogarithmic function

message: the article is wrong — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.123.187.29 (talk) 13:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It says right at the top not to confuse this notion with that of polylogarithm. -- Walt Pohl (talk) 14:30, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correctness 

message: Does
:  \log^3 x \, 
mean
:  \log\log\log x \, 
or does it mean
:  (\log x)^3\text{ ?} \, 
The phrasing of the first paragraph seems to imply the latter, but the former is in some respects more respectable conventional understanding of notation.  If the last meaning was intended, then I think it should be written that way. Michael Hardy (talk) 19:06, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like this has been clarified. ~~~~User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:20, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  ambiguity
Talk:North River (Massachusetts Bay)

message: According to this article (https://www.salemnews.com/news/local_news/president-jackson-s-portrait-to-make-way-for-naumkeag-leader/article_e1e382ee-d91f-5cf5-9373-f81c43ed9b13.html) it used to be Naumkeag River. Solar Apex (talk) 22:34, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naumkeag River?
Talk:FH70

message: I highly doubt this artillery was meant to replace the M114 Tracked Command Vehicle of the Viet Nam War era.  Did the author mean the m198 Howitzer? 137.53.85.122 (talk) 18:27, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Intended Replacement

message: There are suggestions that the ammo designed for FH70 is 'NATO standard', before stating that please provide a STANAG number for standard 155 mm ammo.
Nfe 10:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ammunition

message: Are these guns still in use in the british army or have they been mothballed/scrapped/sold on ?
daft, 21 July 2008.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.65.189.42 (talk) 14:09, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: UK usage?

message: I just added the Original Research tag to this article. There are essentially no references in the main body of the article. There is one reference that is never cited, and the one citation refers to a reference in Japanese that is obviously just about the Japanese use of the weapon. In addition one author basically admits to original research, based on his personal experience with the system ("The writer of this section, who worked the equipment for a number of years..."). The policy on OR explicitly says "Do not add unsourced material from your personal experience, because that would make Wikipedia a primary source of that material...". While valuable and interesting, there are reasons why Wikipedia has the "No Original Research" policy and they should not be lightly disregarded.Darkstar8799 (talk) 21:59, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research 

message: It may be worth noting that neither seems to appear in the title of the UK official documents, the official title being given against the UK flag in the article.  Therefore it's possible that there is no official version of FH-70 or FH70.  To hyphenate or not may be a matter of which country is writing itNfe (talk) 04:47, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  FH70 or FH-70 

message: I do not think the Norwegian upgrade of the M114 in the early 90s is related to the FH-70 project. The information here stating so needs to be sourced.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.162.76.240 (talk) 19:09, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Norwegian usage?
Talk:Atheist Centre

message: Pity the article has to be called Atheist Center! Peter Shearan 08:56, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? 60.231.16.132 (talk) 00:56, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved this page to Atheist Centre, since that's the spelling they use themselves. Singinglemon (talk) 13:01, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Enid Mumford

message: I observe that much of the text of this article is identical to the biography on Mumford's own website. This is probably acceptable - it appears to be authoritative without being overly egotistical. In any case, I hope her website will be maintained after her death.--RichardVeryard 08:56, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Various sources describe Mumford as a companion of the Institute of Personnel Development. I assume this is a reference to the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, which has been the name of this organization since 2000, and I have changed the article accordingly.--RichardVeryard 08:56, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  CIPD 

message: I am not sure why this has just now been tagged with living person biography when she is (sadly) no longer with us. --RichardVeryard 00:22, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Living person? 

message: Shouldn't there be any reference to the ETHICS method she developed? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.170.224.236 (talk) 13:37, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ETHICS method 

message: I can't add my contribution since I can't edit the wiki page. Up952310 (talk) 00:13, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:21, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 November 2021 

message: I have further information I would like to contribute to this wikipedia page regarding one of Enid Mumfords book 'Designing Secretaries: Participative Design of a Word Processing System'. UP900750 (talk) 06:03, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:57, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 November 2021 

message: Mumford, E. (2006). Researching people problems: Some advice to a student. Inf. Syst. J., 16, 383–389.  Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2006.00223.x 
Up934633 (talk) 11:02, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:45, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 November 2021
Category talk:Marvel 2099 titles

message: Any opinion(s) on (1) creating :Category:Marvel 2099, (2) making "Category:Marvel 2099 titles" a subcategory of "Category:Marvel 2099" and (3) making "Category:Marvel 2099" a subcategory of :Category:Marvel Comics imprints ? --EarthFurst 08:57, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sounds good homes. If you want to go ahead and do it you have my blessing.
Tullyman 01:08, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cool