Talk:Mexico City Metro

message: Line 12 has been officially announced, though the actual route has not been given yet, the intersections with their lines and the terminus location has been given. I'll update the description on that matter as soon as I get hard references. :) 18:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Line 12 status

message: :Image:Metro zapata.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Metro zapata.gif

message: Would it be important to mention that it is not allowed to take photos or video inside the  metro? As far as i know it is because it is considered a strategic building or something like that. Would need to find out exactly why, though. Gigakight (talk) 03:55, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: This article uses the word "superficial" several times.  As a native English speaker, I am unaccustomed to this particular use, although I suppose it's sort of correct, as one of the meanings of "superficial" is "near the surface".  However, usage of this word is normally taken to mean "little more than appearance" or "without substance".  I think it would be better to say "surface", but I am not sure exactly how the lines & stations in question are built, so this word may not be entirely correct either.   --BetaCentauri 19:31, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of the word "superficial" 

message: Hi. I'm about to start a major reconstruction to this article. My main goal is to wipe out redundant information; see for example how many times are the colours of a line repeated. The "network" section should only include a brief introduction to the lines (a single table would work) so the rest of the info can be moved into the main list of stations page. In the other hand, there are many way-too-short sentences, need to fix that up. --Fluence (talk) 14:11, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fewer tables 

message: As part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articles I have completed a merge and redirect of all the metro stations in :Category:Articles lacking sources from October 2006 or at least all the ones with article names that begin "metro".  The lack of references made all the articles fail WP:V and WP:N, the solution per Wikipedia:Notability (Railway lines and stations) is to merge them all into the main article. Jeepday (talk) 23:13, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: REDIRECT [[Mexico City Metro]] per [[WP:STATION]]

message: Was 'Total Recall' filmed here? Does anybody know the exact locations of filming? Should it be added to the article? 178.90.57.249 (talk) 05:36, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total Recall 

message: Could this be merged? Perhaps just use thumbnail images for the stations and link them to their separate articles? The geo-referencing and the sporadic blocks of texts look ugly in the scope of the article and dont add anything that cant be found on their individual pages. Mwheatley1990 (talk) 16:29, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on stations 

message: Over at commons:Category talk:Mexico City Metro stations there is now a list of those stations for which commons does not have a photograph.  Mexico City Metro photographers please take note of the stations for which we need photographs.  Thank you. 69.115.42.244 (talk) 16:20, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  request for photos 

message: Dudes, Line 12 is totally open--I've been riding it daily.  You guys need to reflect that on the map. Simply said: THE MAP NEEDS UPDATING.  Do it and help the world.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.206.143.173 (talk) 05:02, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Over the next few days I will be uploading a new scaled map based on the given location of every station. I've tried to follow the actual railtrack for each line. It counts all 195 current stations, including all 20 stations of line 12 and renamed stations on lines 3, 6, 8 and B. I'll be ready to add future line 12 stations ("Valentín Campa Salazar" and "Olivar del Conde") when needed, namely early 2014 --Fluence (talk) 07:37, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Map Urgently Needed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Mexico City Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.metro.df.gob.mx/servicios2/tarjrecargable.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:50, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Either the section has an error, or something is unclear.  One paragraph says, "The price for a single day ticket is currently MXN $5.00," or MXN $3 or zero, depending on eligibility.  Another paragraph says, "STC Metro rechargeable cards were first available for an initial cost of MXN $10.00. The card would be recharged...to a maximum of MXN $120.00...for 20 trips."  At MXN $5 or less per single day ticket, 20 trips would cost a maximum of MXN $100, not 120.  Are people paying extra to use a rechargeable card, and, if so, why?TVC 15 (talk) 09:03, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fares and pay systems 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 11 external links on Mexico City Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160821032221/http://www.metro.cdmx.gob.mx/operacion/cifrasoperacion.html to http://www.metro.cdmx.gob.mx/operacion/cifrasoperacion.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110917032444/http://www.metro.df.gob.mx/sabias/linea12b.html to http://www.metro.df.gob.mx/sabias/linea12b.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151208125525/http://www.metro.df.gob.mx/operacion/compaflu0203.html to http://www.metro.df.gob.mx/operacion/compaflu0203.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151208152557/http://www.metro.df.gob.mx/operacion/compaflu0406.html to http://www.metro.df.gob.mx/operacion/compaflu0406.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151208131831/http://www.metro.df.gob.mx/operacion/compaflu0709.html to http://www.metro.df.gob.mx/operacion/compaflu0709.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151208162012/http://www.metro.df.gob.mx/operacion/compaflu0810.html to http://www.metro.df.gob.mx/operacion/compaflu0810.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151208164301/http://www.metro.df.gob.mx/operacion/compaflu0911.html to http://www.metro.df.gob.mx/operacion/compaflu0911.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151208171654/http://www.metro.df.gob.mx/operacion/compaflu1012.html to http://www.metro.df.gob.mx/operacion/compaflu1012.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150814065442/http://www.metro.df.gob.mx/operacion/compaflu.html to http://www.metro.df.gob.mx/operacion/compaflu.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130605160817/http://mexico.transeunte.org/2009/12/09/aprueban-usuarios-incremento-a-la-tarifa-del-metro/ to http://mexico.transeunte.org/2009/12/09/aprueban-usuarios-incremento-a-la-tarifa-del-metro
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130126041730/http://www.metro.df.gob.mx/avisostc/avisostcDetalle1.html?id_avisos=26 to http://www.metro.df.gob.mx/avisostc/avisostcDetalle1.html?id_avisos=26
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:42, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: (the deepest of which are   below street level) why does sqbr not work here? Peter Horn User talk 19:05, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: "Error in convert: Ignored invalid option "sqbr"". © Tbhotch™ (en-3). 17:10, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Peter Horn User talk 01:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does sqbr (square brackets) not work here? 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:37, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: As of 1960, 38% of Mexicans over the age of five were illiterate and only 5.6% of Mexicans over the age of six had completed more than six years of school.Francisco Alba, The Population of Mexico: Trends, Issues, and Policies (New Brunswick: Transaction Books, 1982), 52.
This makes no sense. How could any child of six be expected to have completed more than six years of school? Should that say "sixteen"? Or is this just badly expressed? I have commented out that last bit until somebody can check that book (I don't have it) and find out what that should really say. Kelisi (talk) 05:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It is badly expressed at most. Not being able to access a book is not a legitimate reason to remove content. In simple terms, it is meant to say that only 5.6% of the population had finished elementary school the 1960s and 38% of the population were illiterate. (CC) Tbhotch™ 03:32, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious statistic