lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Abingdon Abbey

message: "In 1258, following a dispute, the land was formally appropriated to the abbey and a vicarage was ordained. As it was close to Abingdon Abbey, it was probably run by the monks themselves rather than being left to a steward. In 1278, however, Hugh de Courtenay, Lord of the Manor of Sutton, sued the abbey for advowson. An allegedly biased jury was impanneled and in 1284 it found unexpectedly for Courtenay. Solomon of Rochester, the chief justice of the eyre, who presided over the jury, was the first to be partitioned by the Courtenays."
This passage is very unclear. 1. A person is normally ordained, not a vicarage. 2. Why should a steward or monks run a vicarage? 3. "the first to be partitioned"? What does "partitioned" mean here? It links to advowson, which has nothing to do with partitions. Does this mean the first vicar to be appointed? 4. The refs have page numbers of over 100 even though they only go up to 38 in the source. Dudley Miles (talk) 13:10, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear text
Talk:Brit Air

message: http://britair.yms-admin.com/photos/swf/phototheque.swf?categorie=1
http://britair.yms-admin.com/photos/swf/phototheque.swf
http://www.bea.aero/docspa/2003/f-js030622p/htm/table.htm
http://www.bea.aero/docspa/2003/f-js030622/htm/table.htm
WhisperToMe (talk) 08:37, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Stuff to archive
Talk:Aigle Azur

message: :Image:Aigle azur logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 02:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Aigle azur logo.gif
Talk:Air Méditerranée

message: * English: http://cxfile.advences.com/airmediterranee/cgv/en.pdf - http://www.webcitation.org/67Jlp5Uvv
** Still says HQ is at "Le Fauga, 31, France"
* French: http://cxfile.advences.com/airmediterranee/cgv/fr.pdf - http://www.webcitation.org/67Jlqefsh
WhisperToMe (talk) 19:43, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Conditions of carriage
Talk:Bidhuna

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:41, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Excessive details in this entry: is it necessary?! Have a look please.Super48paul (talk) 17:05, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  DETAILS?!
Talk:8th October Revolutionary Movement

message: In English-speaking countries, the term "Marxist-Leninist" has been hijacked by Stalinists, but this is not the case in Brazil. As a result, other than the MR-8 themselves, and of course the right, to which the terminology is indifferent, no one considers the MR-8 Marxist-Leninist in Brazil.
And of course, it is hard to understand why anyone would. It is not organized along the Leninist principle of "democratic centralism", and it is part of a political party that Marxist-Leninists consider a bourgeois party. Participating within a bourgeois political party is anathema to any orthodox Leninist. Ninguém (talk) 18:53, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if your argument on Brazilian definitions of ML could be backed up by reference, it would be interesting. However, we generally don't apply country-specific definitions of ideologies. In the whole its generally preferable to use self-identifications to label parties at wikipedia. MR-8 identifies itself as Marxist-Leninist, its difficult to see why that claim should be questioned. --Soman (talk) 18:51, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not to add that this definition is self-atributed? MR-8 activists undoubtely consider themselves as fervent Stalinists, and identify Stalinism with "Marxism-Leninism" - a term coined, by the way, by Stalin himself, when he described Leninism as "Marxism for the imperialist epoch"; Trotskists, instead, prefer to describe themselves as "Bolshevik-Leninists".Cerme (talk) 13:56, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: yes, but the problem is that PCdoB, PCB, etc. are also self-attributed MLs. We can't have every wikipedia article starting like "PCdoB is a political party that considers itself as a communist party..." --Soman (talk) 14:16, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Marxist-Leninist" 

message: This article hasn't been touched since 2008 as far as I can tell, and the organization it refers to has since gone through many changes. These changes are detailed in the brazillian portuguese article, which also goes a bit more in depth about the group itself. I would be very happy to translate the current portuguese article in order to replace this one with a more updated version, but just to make sure I'm gonna announce my intent to do so here and wait a bit before actually doing it. It's actually also because this is my first major contribution on wikipedia and i'm nervous, but that's less relevant. --CityBreakingDown (talk) 17:02, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is very outdated. It would be very beneficial to translate the brazillian portuguese article, which has been updated recently
Talk:Servair

message: This article reads like a press release from Servair. Someone ought to put a NPOV warning on it!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.130.170.174 (talk) 05:02, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Long Ditton

message: It might help the ordinary reader if the 2001 census population had been quoted in the paragraph: "Long Ditton ward's population at the 2011 census was 6,343 living in 2,504 households. The total area was unchanged from ten years before at 214 hectares (530 acres) and density had increased to 27.2 to 29.6 persons per hectare." --Oldontarian (talk) 12:48, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population of Long Ditton 
Talk:Bilram

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—223.185.39.197 (talk) 10:03, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't said what you think is wrong with the coordinates in the article. I've tweaked them a bit, as they were somewhat to the northeast of what appears to be the correct location; but if you still think that there is an error, you'll need to provide a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 19:51, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Rugby league in Georgia

message: While I don't know if there was a rugby league domestic league in 2005 (I doubt it but will change my mind if I see proof) there most certainly isn't one now. The national team were entirely ring-ins from rugby union and the national team got thrown out of the world cup qualifiers after forfeiting a fixture in Russia in the first round. They have since been expelled from the RLIF and the game no longer exists in the country. I would just edit the article but it is in more detail than I know. I'll try to edit the national team article.James Bowes 19:24, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Georgia Thrown out of RLIF
Talk:List of MTV slogans

message: This should be on Wikiquote
:On the other hand, there's a whole list of corporate slogans of equal importance to MTV slogans, so this should really stay. Eptin (talk) 05:54, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Complaint from [[Special:Contributions/87.212.14.119|User:87.212.14.119]]
Talk:Hachette Livre

message: Y'all should place on this article a template to translate from French.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.208.37.3 (talk) 21:18, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done but not by "Y'all".--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 21:45, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Littlehampton Book Services redirects here, but the article makes no mention of it.  Was this a former name, or was it acquired by Hachette?  AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 10:35, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Littlehampton Book Services 

message: The redirect Littlehampton Book Services has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Isla🏳️‍⚧ 00:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Littlehampton Book Services]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Lafora disease

message: * Example link
Regards, Sześćsetsześćdziesiątsześć 19:32, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: Wikipedia policies do not permit the inclusion of patient support groups or fundraising events.  External links are generally supposed to be used to point the reader to information which is either more authoritative or more extensive than what this article provides.  Please see the external links policies if you have any questions.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:42, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of inappropriate links

message: Can anyone supply some of the latest research material? I don't have time as I am on holiday in a few days time.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.192.192.195 (talk) 16:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Can

message: Can soomeone add the information about the genetics of Lafora on here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdulha (talk • contribs) 09:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Genetic information
Talk:Panopticons

message: I am the marketing officer for Mid Pennine Arts and the Panopticons project.  I have included a caveat on the copyright page of the Panopticons website which specifically states that text is allowed to be reproduced on Wikipedia.
I hope that's satisfactory for allowing Panopticons to continue to be included in Wikipedia.
http://www.panopticons.uk.net/copyright.html
For further discussion please contact me at gayle@midpenninearts.org.uk
Gayle Knight 
01282 421986
*That's helpful. May I suggest that you also send an email from an address associated with www.panopticons.uk.net to permissions-en at wikimedia dot org to assert that permission is given to reproduce text from the Panopticons website.  That should cover all bases. Regards, --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:57, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: This article (and related articles about Rossendale, Rawtenstall and Haslingden) are being defaced with the inclusion of links to website about the Haslingden Halo. This website is not official (and does not appear affiliated with any official organisations). Additionally, the quality of the content is very poor with low resolution photos, and poorly written content (with no source or citations). It seems somewhat plausible (although speculation) that this website is commercially motivated, with numerous adverts.
Therefore, inclusion of this link is unhelpful, and lowers the quality of the respective Wikipedia entries.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.253.184.200 (talk) 14:23, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Haslingden Halo website Spam
Talk:Suez Company (1858–1997)

message: It is part of the British mythology that the Suez Canal company was French. Since the project was in Egypt and required the approval of the viceroy (and the ratification by the Sultan) it necessarily had to be an Egyptian company. According to its statutes (≈ Memorandum and Articles of Association), its "siège = seat" (≈ registered office) was in Alexandria, only its administrative headoffice was in Paris. Lesseps had intended it to be a "universal" company not under any specific national influence. One has to keep in mind that at that time, company law was in its early stages and that a similar concept has only recently been made possible on a narrower scale by the Societas Europaea. Lesseps offered the shares to investors in the whole world (in the sense of those days), i.e. in Europe (including Britain!), Russia and the U.S.A. Only after investors from most other countries were reluctant, the company turned out to have a majority of French private investors (and the viceroy saw no alternative but to subscribe for the remainder of the shares). Napoléon III of France (his wife Eugénie de Montijo was related to Lesseps) helped Lesseps in his difficulties (caused mainly by the British government) but did not invest in the company. For a British historian's view refer to Arnold T. Wilson, The Suez Canal on Google Books. --AHert (talk) 20:06, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Egyptian Company 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Compagnie Financière de Suez and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 16#Compagnie Financière de Suez until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.   -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 07:25, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Compagnie Financière de Suez" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Titus Interactive

message: Titus software decided to enter the American market in 1988 but Titus software were releasing commercial software, in Europe, on the Amstrad and Thomson 8-bits computers a year before they went on to release software for the Amiga or PC. In 1987, they released a number of titles for the Amstrad and Thomson 8-bits computers, "Balthazar" and the "Titus Classiques Volume 1" as examples.  These old games can be downloaded on webpage - http://dcmoto.free.fr/programmes/title.html.
Titus software released "Erebus" for the Amstrad and Thomson 8-bits computers in 1986 see webpage - http://www.cpczone.net/index.php?game=2204
Before 1985, Eric Caen and his close friend Gil Espeche had written commercial games but other software publishers released these games.  For example, "Caspak" was written by Eric and Gil but released by the computer software publisher "Loriciels", for the Oric home computer in 1983.  
It's also forgotton they developed a game (or two) for the Sega Master System - Fire and Forget 2 springs to mind. Ross 77.100.12.167 (talk) 00:59, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early years before the Amiga and PC 

message: Many of the games on the list of "games developed" were only published by Titus and developed by other firms. Therefore I renamed the list to "Games published" and included an indication of whether it was developed by another company. -Ψαμαθος 07:11, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titus Software as Publisher 

message: On the French version of this page, an SVG file is used for the character's head. For this reason, something similar could probably be done here. mechamind90 17:09, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The image could probably be replaced with an SVG 

message: I have a slight issue with the sentence "Titus is most infamous for its reputation in the creation of bad games". Citations have been recently added, but they only outline that several games from Titus appear to be very bad (Superman and Robocop). It is a bit of a stretch to say from this that Titus is only known for bad games. I'd prefer a more neutral way to introduce this part, such as "Titus has created several bad games over its history". Cochonfou (talk) 11:23, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titus and bad games 

message: This article has multiple issues:
1. Its biased. 2. It makes no mention of the first games the company developed or the purchase of Palace software hence their sequel to Palace's Cauldron games.
I shall be rewriting it from scratch.
SamTylr (talk) 08:23, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't looked at this article in quite some time. It does have its fair share of problems. I am removing some overwhelmingly POV and original research statements immediately. If you need a hand at all rewriting the article, want a second opinion on anything, or have any other specific concerns you would like to address let me know. Freikorp (talk) 12:50, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

text: Agreed. If it doesn't have a reference this should be removed. Freikorp (talk) 05:01, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is terrible or as the french might say c'est terrible
Talk:Compagnie Générale Transatlantique

message: Although illustrative images of advertisements, brochures, etc. and other graphic art do enhance the quality of this article, I would construe photographs as more "encyclopedic."  In due course, I would like to see graphic art relegated to a gallery at the bottom of the page because a superior array of photographs has been uploaded.  Until then, the artwork remains a good step in a constructive direction. 
I wonder if other editors share this view? --Tenmei (talk) 14:27, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisment/graphic art
Talk:Hotchkiss et Cie

message: Hotchkiss did nothing between 1940-45?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.129.203.92 (talk) 18:34, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WWII

message: Can someone please recognise that the designation as 13CV or 20CV car like the Hotchkiss refers to the Fiscal (or taxable) ratings and has nothing to do with the power (CV or bhp) developed so conversion into kW is pointless and irrelevant.
Gardencitizen (talk) 13:31, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Power conversions 

message: The stapler manufacturing company and the arms manufacturing company share nothing besides a coincidental family relationship and a surname.  Even the provided source indicates no connection between these two.  I am removing the section about staplers.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 00:00, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Eiríkr noticed the mistake and contacted me via my talk page, we had a good conversation and Eiríkr provided a translation of the relevant material on the Japanese Wiki. Please see the relevant section here: User_talk:Rickinasia#Hotchkiss_and_staplers ₪RicknAsia₪ 01:29, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Staplers -- different company 

message: For anyone interested in illustrating the article: https://bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.es/BVMDefensa/i18n/catalogo_imagenes/grupo.do?path=141433 Ain92 (talk) 16:56, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Hotchkiss album from ca. 1880s
Talk:Société Nouvelle des Forges et Chantiers de la Méditerranée

message: The article for MY Le Ponant says "It was built 1991 by the SFCN shipyard in France". I can't find any real mention of that shipyard.  Obviously this company was closed by then, but could Le Ponant have been built at this company's former yard, and the name somehow been misconstrued? -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 11:35, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't think so. See  Lyndaship (talk) 11:49, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ah, super, thank you. I see the Villeneuve-la-Garenne article lists two shipyards, including "Chantier de la Société Française de Construction navale" (where I believe chantier just means "worksite"). Unfortunately the FR wikipedia doesn't have anything (either under SFCN or variants, or the article for Villeneuve-la-Garenne. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 15:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  MY Le Ponant?
Talk:Blashyrkh

message: (Blashyrkh, Might Ravendark!) 
Gatesofawesome! 19:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

message: If this is just some place that the band made up it really should be merged into the band's article, Immortal (band). -- œ™ 07:05, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Decathlon (retailer)

message: Journalists at the newspaper company ZEIT interviewed some suppliers for decathlon in Sri Lanka about working conditions. The article can be found here:
https://www.zeit.de/wirtschaft/unternehmen/2017-11/decathlon-arbeitsbedingungen-herstellung-textilien-asien/komplettansicht  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.253.50.113 (talk) 08:16, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Critics
Talk:Mazars

message: Has been in place since June 2011, with no contributions here. Apart from one bit of puff which I have replaced today with something more factual, this seems to be a verifiable and encyclopedic article. Propose removal of COI tag.Matruman (talk) 11:34, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag 

message: Is Mazars known as a Jewish accounting firm?  Thanks in advance to anybody who knows. 80.41.53.5 (talk) 09:04, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Mazars known as a Jewish accounting firm?
Talk:SpeedFerries

message: Which page is the master; this one or Speed_Ferries?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.32.3.83 (talk) 18:18, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say the SpeedFerries page is the master. It is the title used by the company. It also has the most content, and is better referenced. I'd suggest that the Speed Ferries page should be a redirect to SpeedFerries. Mjroots (talk) 07:33, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:SeaFrance

message: I have deleted the unsubstantiated claim that two of the vessels are already sold.  That would seem to be impossible, at least regarding SeaFrance Nord Pas-de-Calais, as the judicial decision has not yet meen made - postponed until 11 June.  The Minister of Transport met the workers cooperative (SCOP), preferred bidder (Eurotunnel) and others on 7 June.  A separate sale of SeaFrance Molière might be possible as she is owned by a leasing company, rather than SeaFrance, and not part of the same judicial process.
http://www.lavoixdunord.fr/economie/seafrance-le-ministre-des-transports-frederic-cuvillier-ia0b0n498498
http://www.porttechnology.org/news/french_court_postpones_seafrance_decison_for_third_time/
Davidships (talk) 11:34, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liquidation - Vessels
Talk:Chhatari

message: hello my name is Amardeep my home town is chatari I am living in ravidas mohalla harijan basti my father name MR.JAYANTI PRASHAD my friends names KAMAL CHAUHAN ,GAURAV , NITESH CHAUHAN, VIKASH, MY BROTHER NAME BIKRAM CHAUHAN, BHARAT CHAUHAN,  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.72.58.247 (talk) 03:13, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Chhatari details
Talk:Chhibramau

message: I removed this section as neither the text nor the images were specific to this town. – Fayenatic London 06:12, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Festivals
Talk:Chitrakoot Dham

message: I removed the entire ancient history section per NOR. Can anyone find any sources to back up the statements made in the history section? The two tags on this article (copyediting and citations) could both be solved by finding an actual source. I don't currently have the time, but perhaps this will get the attention of someone that does. Pecopteris (talk) 03:29, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations