lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Resonance

message: The introduction leaves a lot to be desired. It provides only a vague description of what resonance IS and absolutely no description of what causes it. It doesn't even mention the exchange of one type of energy into another, ie potential gravitation into kinetic in a pendulum. I noticed there was a talk page created 3 years ago about this exact same problem. The fact that it hasn't been remedied yet in the least bit is very dismaying. I would do it myself if I were more educated and in a better position to do so. But surely there is SOMEBODY who cares enough to change this. It's not like this is an article about some obscure phenomenon. It's a very basic and well documented phenomenon that anyone with an education in physics should be able to explain. Unfortunately I'm not educated in post-secondary school in physics so I'm not in a position to make the appropriate changes. But surely somebody is. Surely somebody HAS been since it's been brought up.
Thousands of people will be coming to this page looking for an explanation of resonance. And the fact that THIS is what they're going to get. A vague, confusing mess that explains nothing. Will only further damage Wikipedia's reputation as a credible source of information by perpetuating the rumours dating back to the site's inception that "anyone can change it so anything can be wrong." Not to mention it wouldn't teach them anything about the topic and just leave them confused and misinformed. Which I think is the opposite of what Wikipedia's goal is.
I know opinions should be left out of these pages, but I think it's very important that this issue be remedied. Again, I would love to do it. But I fear with my lack of expertise on the subject, and on editing wiki pages, I would be far out of my element. But I implore anyone in such a position to at least fix the intro. The whole page is a mess to be honest, but one step at a time. 2607:FEA8:99C0:61C0:F883:E9FA:5A34:FB67 (talk) 19:54, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horrible introduction. Needs to be changed. Still. 

message: It shall have at least few words about thermoacoustic resonance. 89.134.31.157 (talk) 11:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thermo-acoustic Resonance 

message: Per WP:NOTTEXTBOOK, the section on linear systems should be cut down, I suggest to one example. Johnjbarton (talk) 22:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linear systems section is too too long.
Talk:Temple undergarment

message: I am LDS and am disappointed that this article is here.  But, for the record, some of the information is wrong.  I'm not going to correct it, but if you're doing research on this topic, don't use this article as a basis for your information. —Frecklefoot 14:34, May 21, 2004 (UTC)
:I'd say your attitude hardly serves both wikipedia and your religion. Mikkalai
::On the second thought, I'd like to apologize; I didn't realize it could be against your religion to discuss these issues with outsiders. Sorry. Mikkalai 16:33, 21 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong
Talk:Grand Riemann hypothesis

message: Hmmm - the wording probably needs work. Critical line would usually be the line of symmetry involved in the functional equation (L-function). If this is under s → N - s, you'd have to shift the origin for s to make it Re(s) = ½, though.
Charles Matthews 14:39, 21 May 2004 (UTC)

message: I can't recall ever hearing the name "Grand Riemann hypothesis". Since Ramanujan conjecture is knowm for almost 30 years to be false, it would seem that the notion of "critical line" indeed would have to be significantly modified to accomodate such a swiping conjectural statement. Arcfrk 06:21, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this established terminology?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Particles

message: I made some pictures with The Gimp about the quark structure of barions and mesons.
You can see them here: :hu:Kvark
The Gimp sources (and pictures) are here: http://www.szgti.bmf.hu/harp/gnu/particle-physics
You can use it under GPL.
-- Harp 13:07, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Barions, mesons

message: Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory.  This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.  B2T2 00:25, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project directory 

message: Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention.  Badbilltucker 18:21, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Day Awards
Talk:Ferdinand I of Austria

message: The last time I saw the page, Ferdinand's death date was June 29, 1875. Now, the death date is at the end of his reign without any explanation. Could someone explain this to me? Other sources say it was the previous date (June 29, 1875) G0dzillaboy02 (talk) 11:58, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: There's been quite a bit of back-and-forth editing, with no discussion here. I've protected the page for a few days to give the parties a chance to explain themselvees here. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 17:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

text: This is obvious vandalism. Both the abdication and the date of death are cited, they are found in other literature and other language mutations of Wikipedia, which I also indicated in the Edit summary when I did not notice that this was vandalism and not a mistake. User  changes it without justification in Edit summary and without references. FromCzech (talk) 18:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why did the death date change?
Talk:Ken Dryden

message: Why was the section about the Israeli consul removed?  Is it not noteworthy or is it not true?  --JGGardiner 18:46, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Dryden was raised in Islington-City Centre West (then just outside Toronto) and Boston traded Dryden to the Montreal Canadiens, along with Alex Campbell, for Paul Reid and Guy Allen, whom the Bruins highly valued. 
wtf does this sentence mean -- 174.5.109.235 (talk) 01:35, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early life and hockey career 

message: Other MPs have a section for election results. Should Dryden have one too?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.226.82.162 (talk) 17:27, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Election Results 

message: There was an unreferenced mention of membership at a Cornell University fraternity. The original text said Sigma Phi but a recent editor said it was Sigma Chi. Neither participation was sourced so I removed it. Can anyone else shed some light on this? EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 12:46, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sigma Phi / Sigma Chi membership 

message: Ken Dryden's latest book 142.126.113.152 (talk) 16:12, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:Female suicide bomber

message: The subject of "Female Suicide Bombers" is a notable topic by Wikipedia's definition. Many reputable academic journals and books discuss the term and support this conclusion (Amal Amireh, Jessica Davis, Margaret Gonzalez-Perez, etc.). This page has the potential to grow and communicate relevant, educational information about the subject, and I think the topic deserves its own page. AmyPell (talk) 05:39, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm looking to update this page with proper citations and try and add a bit more content from more locations where this has occurred.Uriahdavis (talk) 18:46, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating info/ adding content
Talk:Augusta Holmès

message: I looked at the format for dates in the articles on the other composers mentioned in htis article. They all have it as monthname daynumber, yearnumber; none of them have it as yearnumber, monthnumber-daynumber. 141.217.70.237 17:09, 21 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed this text: « Saint-Saëns several times asked Holmès to marry him. » 
This is extremely unlikely since Saint-Saëns made no secret that he preferred intimate companionships with men. Charvex (talk) 05:16, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposals by Saint-Saëns??

message: in their book Creating Colette, Fernande Gontier and Claude Francis say that Augusta Holmes had an affair with Colette, although Colette's later biographer Judith Thurman has queried this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.30.54.44 (talk) 17:11, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible bisexuality and affair with Colette
Draft talk:Nedeljko Čabrinović

message: Is there any proof that Cabrinovic was actually a member of the Black Hand (as opposed to Young Bosnia)? Zocky 17:13, 21 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: black hand?

message: Wait a second! I don't think Cabrinovic missed the car. He hit it, but Franz Ferdinand threw the hand-grenade away. wasn't it so? Liberal Nationalist 18:45, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)
I'm wondering why this article gives a different story then other articles on Wikipedia concerning the first grenade.  The others claim the driver accelerated when seeing the grenade and it missed the car; yet this says the grenade was deflected by Franz Ferdinand.  In my opinion if all articles are going to detail the assasination attempt, they should say the same thing.  It looks very bad when Wikipedia contradicts itself. Krushia 16:27, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: missed?

message: i just want to read about čabrinović and it keeps directing me to the page of the assassination. Angelicaprincip (talk) 04:11, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  how do i make it so it doesn't redirect me to the assassination page?
Talk:Mayuko Aoki

message: even though this site is an encyclopidia i still think it needs pics 
i realy want to know what some o these people that make my fav games look like
:As long as the pictures used do not cause us copyright problems then that's fine. -- sannse (talk) 20:52, 21 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I know she sang 2 tracks (mistakingly posted as 4 by the way on the main article) for the Final Fantasy X-2 Vocal Collections, but I thought it might be worth expanding on the two tracks on the Final Fantasy X feel/Go Dream single (feel (solo) and Endless Love, Endless Road (a duet with Tidus' voice actor Masakazu Morita)), and 2 more tracks on the Final Fantasy X Vocal Collections (After Tears - solo, and All the Way - a group piece with Rikku and Lulu's voice actresses Marika Matsumoto and Rio Natsuki). Oh and there was a remix of feel on the FFX Vocal Collections too, but I think that uses Aoki's original lyric recording from feel/Go Dream. It just seems that her Final Fantasy X-2 Vocal Collections got all the attention, leaving the other albums as somewhat worthless. TonyKM (talk) 00:31, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singing work
Talk:Autonomous oblasts of Russia

message: The JAO ought to be more vivid, as it's easy to overlook and think "WTF is there this link to an oddly named map of Russia with no internal borders?" Indeed, all major internal divisions ought to be shown, with JAO being colored boldly so as to be distinguishable. One does not provide a map of the US without an internal borders and simply color in Connecticut with a slightly darker shade. See also Autonomous okrugs of Russia  --Belg4mit 14:47, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean something like this would be a better solution?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 12:33, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly. Although I wonder why a single map with both the JAO and autonomous okrugs wouldn't work. Unless this westerner is missing something, the autonomous oblasts and okrugs are awfully similar. --Belg4mit 21:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They are awfully similar, but they are not the same.  As we are an encyclopedia, we must show the difference.  As for the map, hopefully someone will see this note and will be able to do something about it.  I could probably paint JAO red instead of purple and attach a label to it, but that's about as far as my graphics capabilities stretch.  Thanks!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 12:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Even if they aren't exactly the same, there's no cartographic principle stating a map can only show one distinct type of thing (quite the opposite in fact). As long as the legend is clear it ought to be fine, indeed better than fine as someone could then address the differences; sure one is a "state" and the other a "county", but if they're both "autonomous" that distinction seems irrelevant. --Belg4mit 14:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I personally think the map is fine as it is, and the map is clearly labelled as what it is, anyway. —Nightstallion (?) 15:01, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lucky you. I happen to think it's unclear and not clearly labelled: it took me many minutes to even see that the JAO was highlighted, and the only indication of location is the country outline. I shouldn't hsve to know a lot about Russian geography in order for the map to be understandable. --Belg4mit 21:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coloration
Talk:Header (computing)

message: Gary D: I don't understand your entry. What do you mean by a "member"? (I'm neither a native speaker nor a construction engineer, so I hope the question is not silly.) Sanders muc 19:09, 21 May 2004 (UTC)

message: This ought to be at Header (computing) for consistency with other articles. I don't remember seeing another one with this dab suffix. Hairy Dude 16:23, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree--Lord Snoeckx 22:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move?
Talk:Trigonal crystal system

message: I concure with the contributer below. the title is confusing. I looked yp this article in reference to another article (Ettringite) while researching problems with concrete. instead of a clear susinct article on Trigonal it went off and spoke at large about Rombohedral crystal systems. Importantly without really giving a clear definition of the term Trigonal. My point of view is as an engineer not someone interested in crystals so really anything beyond a definition of the term Trigonal is wasted on me.
My reference book (a Peterson field guide) lists the same name for the 3 and 3bar classes, which I think must be a typo.  But I put it in anyway, rather than just take a guess based on the names of the triclinic classes, as I did at first.  If anyone knows better, please fix it.  Tantalate 19:46, 21 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I would like to rename this and other articles so that all of the articles describing the seven crystal systems are named the same way. For example, I would like to rename this article Rombohedral crystal system. That way it woun't be confued with the general geometric shape. Any objections? O. Prytz 17:39, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See my response at Talk:Orthorhombic, ditto for here. Vsmith 00:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change?

message: This article doesn't seem to be helpful because it doesn't define "Rhombohedral lattice system" or "Trigonal crystal system". 
It just gives vague characteristics. The problem seems endemic on crystal system/lattice/point group/etc articles. For example, is a "rhombohedral lattice system" defined as any set of points with equal length non-orthogonal translation vectors? Or does it just happen to have that property? Is it the only lattice system with that property? 
What is the difference between a "rhombohedral lattice system" and a "trigonal crystal system"? Apparently there is one because this article berates the reader for not knowing the difference and then doesn't explain it. 
For that matter, what is the definition of a crystal system as opposed to a lattice system? All of the articles either don't have definitions or the definitions refer to articles that refer back to the first article. 
This is all very frustrating. Any ideas?
--66.32.188.42 (talk) 07:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition?
Talk:Octo-

message: Octo is also the first name of MUMPS pioneer Octo Barnett. Does anyone know anything more about "Octo" as a person's first name? Is there any language in which it is a common first name? Dpbsmith 19:52, 21 May 2004 (UTC)

message: Twice in this article's history, octagon has been added. This is incorrect. Octagon belongs at the octa- article, the article for the Greek numerical prefix for 8. This article is the octo- article, the article for the Latin numerical prefix for 8. Why is this error common?? 66.245.30.85 17:04, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Octagon 

message: In the prefix articles, as well as the 8 (number) article, it says that octa- is Greek and octo- is Latin. However, elsewhere in Wikipedia, namely, at Octopus, it says that octo- can be either Greek or Latin. Any comments on changing what the articles say?? 66.245.124.50 02:59, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language of Octo-
Talk:Jeff Cohen (actor)

message: I believe Jeff Cohen meets notability guidelines, which state, "A person is generally notable if they meet any of the following standards. [Actors]
# With significant roles in notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions.
# Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following."
Travisl 18:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Cohen starred in 'Ask Max' 1986. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ask_Max
108.36.88.94 (talk) 22:18, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film missing
Talk:Flag of British Indian Ocean Territory

message: Current title is grammatically incorrect.  ナイトスタリオン ✉ 22:40, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to [[Flag of the British Indian Ocean Territory]]

message: This article describes the same thing as Flag of the British Indian Ocean Territory. Probably the content should be moved there and this left just as a redirect. --Romanm 20:39, 21 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge needed
Talk:Flag of the British Indian Ocean Territory

message: This article describes the same thing as Flag of British Indian Ocean Territory. Probably the content from there should be moved here and a redirect should be made. --Romanm 20:40, 21 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge needed 
Talk:Coat of arms of Yukon

message: Material on all Government of Yukon web sites are owned by the Government of Yukon and protected by copyright.
Material on Government of Yukon web sites may be printed, copied or reproduced for non-commercial purposes only. Reproductions must be accurate and must not be represented as an official version. Reproduction or redistribution for commercial purposes requires advance written permission from the Government of Yukon.
Copyright must be acknowledged in the following form:
© 2000, Government of Yukon
----
The actual blazon of this should be given, not just a layman's description.  --Daniel C. Boyer 23:16, 27 May 2004 (UTC)

message: I have assessed this as a Stub, as it only provides the basic information on the topic, and of low importance, as it is a highly specific topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 23:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Clocked logic

message: It seems like a worthy subject. But you need to be more intro-like in your intro. I happen to know what you are talking about, but most people would not have a clue after reading the intro :). Thue 20:46, 21 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Hopefully the intro is now easier for beginners to understand.  It's a technically involved subject, which makes the intro probably the hardest part to write and I wouldn't mind if someone else who knows something about the subject wants to take a stab at it. CyborgTosser 20:42, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: intro

message: It seems like this page needs to be merged with dynamic logic - both pages say that they are synonymous, however they have completely separate articles. odd. Fresheneesz 09:00, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: never mind... I didn't read carefully Fresheneesz 20:37, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with dynamic logic
Talk:Lady Be Good

message: In order to maintain continuity of discussion, I have taken the liberty of moving these threads to Talk:Lady be Good (aircraft). 23skidoo 20:16, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous discussion about aircraft moved

message: This page by rights should be marked as a disambiguation page but there's too much information. The plane, the movies, and the song should each have their own article. If I get a chance I will do this myself, but if anyone wants to get a jump on it, be my guest. 23skidoo 15:24, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs to be split up

message: This was becoming more about the airplane than the song and films, so I have moved that content to Lady be Good (aircraft). 23skidoo 20:13, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Aircraft section moved

message: I have given this page a long-overdue overhaul. It really needs to be a disambiguation page. I'm splitting the content up into separate articles. I don't know if the 1928 film is particularly notable so I will not create an article on that. However the Gershwin musical and the Eleanor Powell film are notable and deserve separate articles. I've removed the Wikiproject tags from here and will place them in the appropriate articles. 23skidoo 02:01, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation page created