Talk:The Series Has Landed

message: Why is this the only episode of the series named Episode Two: The Series Has Landed (Futurama episode) instead of only The Series Has Landed. It is redirected from The Series Has Landed to Episode Two: The Series Has Landed (Futurama episode), shouldn't that be reversed? --javoec 03:58, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as my understanding goes "Episode Two: The Series Has Landed" is the correct, full title of the episode, unlike the other episodes.  Hope that helps. Stardust8212 21:28, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe you're right, because in the DVD that's the name of the episode... but since that's the only one... well, nevermind.--javoec 23:33, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the words "Episode Two" where needed.  Hope that's OK...--Salvax 21:09, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree with Javoec. It seems obvious to me that its title on the DVD was just a goof. There's no reason why it should be the only one with the episode number in the front. I vote to change it. DocNox 01:45, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it should be changed just because "we think the people who created it didn't know what they're talking about" I think it is much more likely that it was done on purpose and, as I have stated elsewhere previously, that it was actually meant to be a parody of the Star Wars franchise naming scheme (i.e. Episode IV: A New Hope). Whatever we may think, this is the episode title and unless someone can prove otherwise there is no good reason to change it. /$.02 Stardust8212 02:11, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Good to know, I don't own the first season DVD's myself so perhaps I spoke out of place but the question still bothers me as to why it has "Episode Two:" on that one episode, it doesn't seem to me like an error that wouldn't be noticed before production.  I no longer have an opinion on this matter because I can't make up my mind.  Also, I'm sorry for shooting my mouth off without proper research earlier. Stardust8212 03:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries; I was just about to defend you when I pulled out the DVD and saw (initially) that you appeared to be right, before I looked at all the other names. :) I find it odd, too, that there would be such a discrepancy, but since the DVD cover art and menu were done at the same time, it can't even be argued that the episode was renamed; given the fact that there is much more evidence for the shorter title, it appears that the DVD menu name is just someone doing their own thing. *shrug* EVula 03:10, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Name Disagreement 

message: "One of these days alice, whizz! bang! straight to the moon!"
wheres that referance from?
:Its a reference to The Honeymooners. EVula // talk // ☯ // 19:54, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fat astronout referance 

message: Good news everyone! In the ongoing attempt to bring Futurama episode pages up to snuff I have found an article that might discuss this episode, unfortunately I have to pay to view it. I'm leaving the link here for anyone else that may want to work on the article, I'll probably come back to it later. If anyone else finds sources that may be helpful please note them here to help coordinate clean up efforts. Kansas City Star article Stardust8212 04:34, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Guidelines 

message: I think this section is wrongly tagged as a trivia section, the only thing there that I can see as trivia is the comment about the temperature. I think the tag should be removed, but I wanted to check with everyone first. jjthewonderboy 05:03, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Consider reading WP:TRIVIA before removing the tag. Some editors consider all unsourced cultural references to be a type of trivia. I personally don't mind if you do remove the tag but I wouldn't be surprised if someone added it back. Stardust8212 12:55, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural References tag 

message: Is it THAT hard to give a propper summary? You leave several glaring gaps in this "overview" that it'd be better to remove it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.238.179.195 (talk) 23:43, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I just love wikipedian's'zishsiz way of being retarded 

message: I don't feel like editing the page myself, but I can't believe that "Fry and Leela take refuge in the Apollo 11 lander (Which, in reality, would be impossible since the habitable section was launched from the base to dock with the Command Module)" is still in the summary.  Clearly visible behind Leela's head when she looks out the window is a plaque that reads "Lander returned to this site by the Historical Sticklers Society."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.23.133.70 (talk) 16:24, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it, it was added about a week ago and I get so tired of just reverting everybody's edits that I was hoping someone else would take an interest in fixing it. Oh well. Stardust8212 18:59, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Sticklers 

message: This episode, along with all other episodes from season one, is being reviewed to determine whether it currently satisfies Wikipedia's various policies in guidelines. All editors are welcome and encouraged to contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Futurama/Season 1 review. Stardust8212 18:40, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode review 

message: How does this relate to ancient people's beliefs about an ocean/whales on the Moon. Some people say "The Man in the Moon" is a whale, not a man. Also, is this a reference to the Lunar Whale in Final Fantasy 4(II US/IV Jpn)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.171.86 (talk) 23:03, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whalers on the Moon 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Series Has Landed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070701044641/http://www.annieawards.com/27thannieawardwinners.htm to http://www.annieawards.com/27thannieawardwinners.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:14, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :I'm gonna go build my own theme park with blackjack and hookers!. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 11#I'm gonna go build my own theme park with blackjack and hookers! until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Onel5969 TT me 01:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "I'm gonna go build my own theme park with blackjack and hookers!" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]