Talk:Nike+iPod

message: How does someone change the pic for this article? The ipod nano case is hideous!
This page is totally written like an advertisement and the format needs to be Wikified!41.245.12.138 19:59, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pic

message: I agree. there is a specific point of view in this article  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.137.228.77 (talk) 00:25, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point of View 

message: Though the initial product, and still the flagship, is the one with integration with iPod nanos, that particular instance of the product is a subset of the system that works with or without an iPod.  The article should no longer redirect from Nike+, which should become the main article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.112.19.2 (talk) 21:58, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal: change focus from Nike+iPod to Nike+ with a section on iPod integration

message: Is it worth mentioning that there have been issues?
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/nike+ipod/another-ipod-bug-nike%252B-doesnt-work-well-with-nanos-310617.php Mondochrome 17:28, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note of problems? 

message: I just recently purchased a newer model iPod Touch and discovered that there is a Nike+ app pre-installed. Perhaps someone with a bit more knowledge as to how the sensor interacts with the Touch model (wifi?) could include a section on the article page.Windmillninja (talk) 07:07, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  iPod Touch Integration 

message: Does anyone know what has happened to the SportBand mentioned in the article? I was looking to buy one and haven't been able to find it anywhere on Nike or Amazon?
Here's the info about the launch from Engadget back in April so it seems unlikely they have discontinued it already. -DjD- (talk) 11:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  SportBand End of Lifed? 

message: I question the relevance of the Privacy Concerns section and how much it adds to the article.  The University of WA study is more about "what can be done" with the device than facts relating to it's criminal usage.  The Abstract states that your run route could be tracked.  This is laughable at best once you see the full unit later in the report used to track a runner.  It's the Touch Sensor joined to a computer chip joined to a lengthy transmitter- imagine that tucked into a shoe and the runner not noticing it.  This would be better suited for a spy article, or James Bond gadget blog.  While it's a fun exploration of technology and the writer's ability to tinker with it, putting jazzed up content from this report is unfitting for this great Wikipedia.  Skydive23 (talk) 21:11, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree with what you just said. That section should not be in the article, it is clearly nothing but speculation. I have removed it. TheFreeloader (talk) 01:59, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the justification for removal was sound at the time, based on the fact that only a  primary source was used to support it.  But we do have secondary sources, such as the 2006 article in Wired ("Nike+ IPod = Surveillance").  I'm not sure if the entire paragraph should be restored, or just a portion of it, but this issue was covered by reliable sources and should be discussed in some way.  Additionally, the number of notable and reliable quoted sources in the Wired article more than justifies inclusion. Viriditas (talk) 10:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Added link to further reading. Viriditas (talk) 10:39, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Privacy Concerns 

message: I've heard speculation and rumors that the sensor actually communicates over Bluetooth.  Can anyone confirm or deny this? gujamin (talk) 23:51, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No they use ANT (network) --Trounce (talk) 11:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

text: No, they don't use ANT, they use a 2.4GHz radio produced by Nordic Semiconductor, with a proprietary protocol.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.52.77.54 (talk) 23:10, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bluetooth? 

message: Nowhere in the marketing material from Apple does it mention that the battery in the Nike+ sensor cannot be replaced. This is fairly important information for anyone wanting to know about this device -- the battery can go dead in less than a year, and neither Apple nor Nike offer any guarantee on the battery life. This should be pointed out somewhere in the article.
62.202.43.167 (talk) 21:27, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battery not replaceable! 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Nike+. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110714182359/http://forums.nike.com/ann.jspa?annID=216 to http://forums.nike.com/ann.jspa?annID=216
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:00, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified