lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:For a New Liberty

message: * Thanks for getting this page started. It's been on my mental "To Do" list and am glad you have beaten me to it. :) -- RayBirks 02:12, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Startup comments

message: Is there actually a difference between the 1989 and 2006 editions? Aldrich Hanssen (talk) 02:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A difference? 

message: Is it really accurate to say that it was the "first modern free-market anarchist manifesto"? What about The Market for Liberty, which was published in 1970? EVCM (talk) 03:53, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "First modern free-market anarchist manifesto" 

message: "It is the only book for which Rothbard received a mainstream publishing contract." Really? Van Nostrand , Columbia University Press , Richardson & Snyder  and others are not mainstream?  – S. Rich (talk) 18:50, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mainstream publishing contracts 

message: The article appears to have been written by Rothbard's fellow travelers, insofar as it presents his fringe philosophical views as if they were accepted fact. Consider this passage on education:
Chapter 7, "Education", voices opposition to government involvement in education. He notes that the very nature of the public school requires the imposition of uniformity and the stamping out of diversity. Social conflict is unnecessarily generated by the school system having to choose between traditional or progressive, segregated or integrated, rather than letting each school and each customer choose individually what is best for them.
And another passage on the non-aggression principle:
He points out that while [the nonaggression principle] is almost universally applied to private individuals and institutions, the government is considered above the general moral law, and therefore does not have to abide by this axiom. Herein lies the fundamental distinction of libertarians:
Note that these fringe/extremist assertions are either said to have been "noted" or "pointed out" by Rothbard, or are presented without even being attributed to him; the clear implication is that these assertions are established fact. For a New Liberty's "encyclopedic" entry is a disgrace. We need to find independent mainstream RS (not from Rothbard's employees who wrote reviews for "Mises Academy" or whatever) evaluating the views expressed in this book. Steeletrap (talk) 19:03, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Because no one has made any meaningful attempt to address these issues over the last two years, I have the taken the initiative by simply removing most of the description of Rothbard's book. It was very poorly written and poorly organized, as well as bloated and overly detailed. I have a copy of the book (actually, I'm the proud owner of no less than two different editions), so it will be possible for me to gradually add something better as a replacement for what I removed. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 10:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Disgraceful bias
Talk:Empress Jitō

message: The following text was posted in the main body of this article, but no references are given to validate its factual basis.  The  brief paragraph is moved here pending further clarification:
Her son, Prince Kusakabe was an ordinary prince. However, her elder sister's son, Prince Ōtsu was an able prince. She had him commit suicide by the plot . However, Kusakabe had died before he became an emperor. Therefore, her grandchild became an emperor. 
Of course it can be restored in a moment .... --Ooperhoofd 21:37, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needing reference/source
Talk:Carrier protein

message: Would it be appropriate to put this article into :Category:transport proteins, or is there a difference between carrier and transport proteins?  If not, should this article be merged with transport protein?  Thanks, delldot | talk 07:18, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cat

message: According to the IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 2004, the term "carrier protein" has several meanings:
1. Protein to which a specific ligand or hapten is conjugated.
2. Unlabeled protein introduced into an assay at relatively high
concentrations which distributes in a fractionation process in the same
manner as labeled protein analyte, present in very low concentrations.
3. Protein added to prevent non-specific interaction of reagents with
surfaces, sample components, and each other.
4. Protein found in cell membranes, which facilitates transport of a
ligand across the membrane.
The present article focuses only on definition #4, but should be amended in some way to reflect the various meanings rather than focusing on just one. Anyone know how to handle this situation?
bwbrian (talk) 16:23, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Could move this article to say cell membrane carrier protein and make carrier protein a disambiguation article ? Keyhole_limpet_hemocyanin#Use_in_biotechnology says it is used as a carrier protein in antibody manufacture - Could be meaning #1 ? - Rod57 (talk) 19:54, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: three other meanings

message: The active transport section said (2/23/2012, 16:40): "Active transport involves the use of an electrochemical gradient, involves  (sic) proteins s opposed to (sic) rier pro, and does not use (sic) nergy produced in the cell."  And wasn't formatted correctly, appearing in a "code box" (I assume it's meant for computer code) instead of a normal paragraph. But I thought that the definition of active transport (as opposed to passive) was that it did use energy.  I fixed for formatting of the code, but I don't know whether what was written was actually correct.  What should this paragraph say? Jimw338 (talk) 00:03, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of Active Transport section? 
Talk:Empress Kōken

message: Could more be added to this article about this emperor's relations with Tang China (and Emperor Xuanzong of Tang)? 173.89.236.187 (talk) 17:05, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relations with Tang China 

message: Please, can you somehow expand on part of her main biography? I have added as much verified information as I could to the part of her short biography, but, unfortunately, I do not have more extensive reliable information backed up by sources. Please, if any editor has such, let them write part of her Basic Biography, as it is too scarce. Super20020917 (talk) 12:11, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to Editors
Talk:Method of image charges

message: The resulting potential when the imaginary charge is INSIDE the sphere is valid OUTSIDE the sphere. The article says it's only valid INSIDE the sphere. If you agree with this, change the article. Also; It's quite simple to derive the magnitude and position of the imaginary charge. If there is interest, I can provide the derivation in form of a picture and some of you guys can add it to the article. 
Edit: nevermind, I saw now that the image charged is outside the sphere and the "real" charge is inside. I was confused because Griffiths got it the other way around. 
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.113.82.187 (talk) 18:29, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Valid OUTSIDE the sphere

message: I wrote an article on uniqueness theorem as the one provided here is rather sad... Perhaps the section in this article can be eliminated (or else should be rewritten)? IlyaV (talk) 21:32, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree JabberWok 02:44, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Uniqueness Theorem

message: What is \rho\, in the formula    V\left(\rho,y\right) = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \left( \frac{q}{\sqrt{\rho^2 + \left(y-a \right)^2}} + \frac{-q}{\sqrt{\rho^2 + \left(y+a \right)^2}} \right) \, ? --Saippuakauppias ⇄ 12:33, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the radial coordinate in cylindrical coordinates, that is, the distance from the axis of the cylinder (which in this case is the line through the charge and its image). —Keenan Pepper 18:26, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  rho 

message: The article says the image moment is rotated by pi radians azimuthally, but I believe this should be a polar rotation (about the z-axis). That is the rotation given in the equation, and in the figure. Please change if you agree.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacobbaron (talk • contribs) 16:11, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conducting Plane Reflection for Electric Dipole Moments 

message: I think the Method of Images page should be merged with this page. Pratyush Sarkar (talk) 14:10, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with another article
Talk:Lake Superior Chippewa

message: Further research into the La Pointe Band of Lake Superior Chippewa didn't reveal much in the way of sourcing on the band. That article is a short stub, and it should be merged with this article based on Reason 5 in the merger reason list. Merging wouldn't make this article unduly long. M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 00:38, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Support Elinruby (talk) 03:35, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge La Pointe Band into this article
Talk:Jack Sarfatti

message: I have re-tagged the article with  and . There are plenty of sources that criticize Sarfatti, such as this article from the Skeptical Inquirer which says  You can also look in the seven(!) archives of this talk page for more, including some legal threats by (someone claiming to be) Sarfatti himself. (The account making said claim was personally banned – not just blocked – by Jimbo.) While older revisions on the page were biased against Sarfatti, the current version excludes criticism of his ideas. Therefore, I have re-added the aforementioned tags. HouseBlastertalk 00:57, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Tags
Talk:Gary Public Transportation Corporation

message: The lemma reads like a come-on for the GPTC site. The lists of routes are of interest to locals only. Put up a schematic image of the line network instead. The history part is weak, with few dates, the name "Gary Railways Inc." on a transport token isn't even mentioned. There is no list of bus and other equipment types used in the past or even now and nothing on historical logos and liveries. Peterk2 (talk) 16:01, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wish list
Talk:Human Head Studios

message: Should we say something about the fact that Human Head wants to stay indepentant? That, as I remember it, is the reason they broke away from Raven. TVRJomar 02:50, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: So now that Human Head is shut down and the entire team has been relocated to Roundhouse Studios, should we move this article to Roundhouse Studios, or make a separate article altogether? 2605:A000:1417:483C:E6CE:8FFF:FE77:9C95 (talk) 04:31, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Roundhouse Studios? 

message: https://www.reddit.com/r/Games/comments/1fqkcx/ign_bethesda_tried_to_kill_human_head_prey_2_to/
https://www.ign.com/articles/2013/06/05/what-went-wrong-with-human-heads-prey-2 2.136.173.47 (talk) 12:28, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human Head DON'T "close his doors",... was killed by bethesda to buy it at cheap price, please, don't stole the truth too
Talk:Bellvue, Colorado

message: I have lived in this area for over 40 years and in the Bellvue Post office jurisdiction for over 32 years. The name is NEVER spelled "Bellevue". I have removed "(sometimes spelled "Bellevue")" from the article.
Dagme (talk) 04:13, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 
Talk:Urethritis

message: Should the first sentence end with "increased frequency"  ?
Tbsmith 02:52, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First sentence

message: The length of the cotton swap insertion is obvious vandalism, and I'm unsure what the correct length is. I'll research it. **I just reverted it instead**. --Thehiddenmind (talk) 04:50, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: The "prevent" section should be rewritten, if not deleted. Nazgul02 (talk) 11:04, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prevent 

message: This page needs the attention of an expert. There are some problems with the information. The last sentences are particularly problematic in terms of syntax and grammar - as well as content. Jm3106jr (talk) 23:24, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 

message: After I began an attempt to improve the article I noticed there is another article that has a slightly narrower scope: Non-gonococcal_urethritis. Perhaps the Urethritis article should evolve into a simple summary article that refers to Non-gonococcal_urethritis and perhaps either the clap or a new gonococcocal urethritis article. VIOLENTRULER (talk) 06:17, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: Introduction: Include more information regarding subtopics listed.
Include population, clinical manifestations, epidemiology, etiology, causes, pathophysiology, treatment management, patient education, diagnosis (different types), signs and symptoms. A.Nono, Future UCSF PharmD. (talk) 
:Hi Group 30, welcome to Wikipedia. I'm glad to see folks interested in medicine-related pages here; there's lots to be done. I'll try to keep an eye on this talk page, so if you have questions as you get to editing, feel free to ask here. To help guide your thinking and research, you can find a list of sections that we often include in articles on diseases/syndromes here. Otherwise, happy editing! Ajpolino (talk) 21:39, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Foundations II 2020 Group 30 proposed edits
Talk:Winnipeg Goldeyes

message: The article needs to explain why the Northern League version of the Goldeyes played so few league games; this was due to the fact that this incarnation of the Northern League was a short season Class A League, whereas the 21st Century American Association, as an independent league, is free to set its own season length and uses 100 games, considerably more than short season leagues but far less than the 140 games of full-season MLB-affiliated leagues.  2600:1004:B149:6EC2:0:53:9A6:2801 (talk) 21:57, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season length
Talk:South Coast League

message: Whomever added the bulk of the history section comes across as very bitter and jaded.  That the league folded is, of course, under no dispute.  However, things like "Poorly conceived and weakly executed, the league was a disaster from the start as they could only get leases in less than desirable baseball markets" speak of nothing neutral at all.  Besides that, the citation following that sentence has nothing to do with prose (it's a link to ballparkreviews.com entry on one of the stadiums used).  I wouldn't even know where to start with fixing this one.  Sliver7 (talk) 19:54, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Neutrality
Talk:Frontier League

message: Don't all professional baseball players receive meal money in addition to their salaries?  I'm sure that it's just at the independent league level like the Frontier League it is just that it is a larger proportion of the compensation.  72.105.0.89 (talk) 03:22, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meal Money 

message: Does someone know what level is the Frontier League? Like AAA? AA? 192.139.231.252 (talk) 14:06, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: None. The rankings of Single-A, Double-A, Triple-A apply to teams and leagues in Minor League Baseball, not to independent baseball leagues like the Frontier League. You can find various opinions of what they're comparable to, but there is no official answer. -- Pemilligan (talk) 04:46, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  level of play 

message: Is there a supporting reference for a New England team? -- Pemilligan (talk) 00:47, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated with the league's press release. -- Pemilligan (talk) 01:04, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New England?
Talk:St. Joe Blacksnakes

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect St. Joseph (team name TBA). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Regards, SONIC678 04:48, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "St. Joseph (team name TBA)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:VF-74

message: VF-92 Silver Kings was a separate squadron if I recall correctly. This unit was paired up with VF-96 Fighting Falcons and flew F-4 Phantoms until they were disestablished in 1977. VF-74 may have at one time had VF-92 as a previous designation but the Silver Kings are totally separate from the Bedevilers and actually existed at the same time. Wikiphyte 15:18, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just going to write the same message. Sadly, it is four years later. Thanks, Wikipedia!--172.191.224.101 (talk) 23:44, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  VF-92 Re-Direct error
Talk:Double tracking

message: I sincerely wish amateurs and lay people would not attempt to edit technical pages. I have been a recording engineer for over two decades, and a student of Recording for longer than that, and I have never seen or heard of "single tracking" in ANY recording sourcebook or document, let alone in any studio. I have only seen the term used in lay articles, used to illustrate the difference between a doubletracked and non-doubletracked vocal. Zephyrad 03:02, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I couldn't figure out how to put this in the article as a citation, but I found this by checking against the Buddy Holly article:  --User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 14:20, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pioneered by Buddy Holly 

message: Since Geoff Emerick invented it when the Beatles recorded, Buddy Holly who died in the fifties could not have used it. Dbaps (talk) 19:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Who says Emerick invented it? ~Kvng (talk) 15:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buddy Holly could not have used double tracking 

message: Hello , you recently removed the audio examples I posted with the comment that there are already enough guitar samples and a vocal sample would be better. I agree with you on this ;) However, I think that the examples of artificial double tracking with delay, chorus, detune and copy-paste are encyclopedic per se and thus make a useful addition to the article. What do you think ? Skimel (talk) 16:08, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is confusing to include so many examples. We should focus on an example of what's covered in the article. Everything in the Examples section is about vocals. Guitar is not mentioned in the article but could be implied by the "play along with" statement in the lead so I'm OK to leave the one guitar example until we get something better. If you want to add some information about guitar double-tracking to the body of the article, you're welcome to but please cite some reliable sources. IME, what is demonstrated in some of the examples I removed would be more likely to be described as layering; double tracking tends to be specific to vocals but, if you disagree, let's have a look at what sources say. ~Kvng (talk) 16:18, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audio examples of automatic / artificial double tracking
Talk:Hawaii Winter Baseball

message: The Former teams section lists some teams that were never actually fielded. I believe the Kona Navigators and Lahaina Whalers only existed as logos for selling additional hats.  The Kaneohe Bay Dawgs and Kona Man O'Wars were announced as expansions teams, but Kaneohe was later withdrawn, and I think the same goes for Kona.
-- Pemilligan (talk) 16:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not former teams 
Talk:East Dubuque, Illinois

message: Right now, according to the map in the article, E. Dubuque is in Iowa.  News Flash:  It's in Illinois.  Someone needs to correct this.  I'd do it, if I knew how. HuskyHuskie (talk) 04:20, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Somebody needs to move the dot 
Talk:Constitution of Utah

message: Shouldn't this page be in a layout with every article and section in a nice order instead of random interesting facts.  Sodaplayer  talk contributions  04:16, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it should. I just wanted to create something and so did this. It does need to be corrected though. 68.39.174.238 00:39, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout 

message: This random listing of facts looks similar to , right down to the exclamation point at the end of the prohibition on the trading of blacklists...  How odd.
:You are referring to a mirror site—another website that has simply copied Wikipedia's material. It happens all the time. GeorgeLouis (talk) 04:44, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curiouser and Curiouser
Talk:Yoyoy Villame

message: Added a reference about his music but more sourcing needed. Capitalistroadster 22:13, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference
Talk:Comandos Autónomos Anticapitalistas

message: I've reverted to the version 26-July-2006, which was most correct. The two last changes done after it were problematic:
* Error changed CAA for CAAC, yet the actual acronyme was CAA.
* Mountlive added the sentence even though it engaged on the same later on at the end of the article, refering to ETA's attitude towards killing politicians. That's more proper of the article on ETA, the original sentence wasn't ambiguous anyhow as it says clearly at the time. 
--Sugaar 03:17, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't see why pointing out the fact that ETA engaged later on in killing politicians should be erased. Actually it gives a good point of its "evolution" on the matter and the fact that the CAA where first in this regard. But if it makes you happier, then we'll leave things as they are now, I don't have time nor appetite for editing wars. Thanks. Mountolive 04:39, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because we are not discussing ETA in this article. C'mon! --Sugaar 03:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're probably right, the at the time, while maybe falling a bit short, should be ok anyway. Mountolive 03:52, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion 

message: This better treated on a single page. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 00:17, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 10:36, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Mendeku]]
Talk:Fan Dance (exercise)

message: 24 hours to do 24km? The Selection pass time is less than 4 hours. The author must have got confused with the Long Drag which is 24 hours (preferably less than 20 hours in good weather however)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.105.252.245 (talk) 13:54, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Times 

message: I removed some information from the Pen y Fan page about the Fan Dance. That page already links here, and the information was badly formatted and not exactly well-written.  Rather than try to rewite it, I thought it would make more sense for people just to find the information on this page.  If anyone watching this page wants to review my commit and see if any of the information is actually worth saving on this page, please do: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pen_y_Fan&diff=prev&oldid=537957936
duncan (talk) 00:01, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pen y Fan 

message: I don't know much about this topic and this article has not helped having clearly been doctored by unsigned contributors (presumably members/sympathisers of special forces). I would suggest that the whole thing simply deserves a paragraph in the Special Air Services article especially if discussion of problems associated with the exercise are deleted with unreferenced assertions. Hughwill (talk) 10:47, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really poor article