lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Evanescence band members

message: I created a timeline. I'm not sure about all the dates. See where is the correct place to use it. (Sorry my bad English)
ImageSize = width:800 height:350
PlotArea = left:100 bottom:60 top:0 right:50
Alignbars = justify
DateFormat  = dd/mm/yyyy
Period = from:01/01/1995 till:01/01/2010
TimeAxis = orientation:horizontal format:yyyy
Colors =
  id:vocals    value:red    legend:Vocals
  id:lguitar   value:blue   legend:Lead guitar
  id:rguitar   value:green  legend:Rythim guitar
  id:drums     value:yellow legend:Drums
  id:bass      value:purple legend:Bass
  id:key       value:pink   legend:Keyboards and Programming
  id:Lines     value:black  legend:Albums
 
Legend = orientation:horizontal position:bottom
ScaleMajor = increment:1 start:1995
BarData =
  bar:Amy       text:"Amy Lee"
  bar:Ben       text:"Ben Moody"
  bar:David     text:"David Hodges"
  bar:John      text:"John LeCompt"
  bar:Rocky     text:"Rocky Gray"
  bar:WillB     text:"Will Boyd"
  bar:Terry     text:"Terry Balsamo"
  bar:Tim       text:"Tim McCord"
  bar:Troy      text:"Troy McLawhorn"
  bar:WillH     text:"Will Hunt"
  bar:WillSH    text:"Will 'Science' Hunt"
PlotData=
  width:10 textcolor:black align:left anchor:from shift:(10,-4)
  bar:Amy        from:01/01/1995 till:end           color:vocals
  bar:Ben        from:01/01/1995 till:01/10/2003    color:lguitar
  bar:David      from:01/01/2000 till:01/01/2002    color:key
  bar:John       from:01/01/2003 till:01/01/2007    color:rguitar
  bar:Rocky      from:01/01/2003 till:01/01/2007    color:drums
  bar:WillB      from:01/01/2003 till:01/09/2006    color:bass
  bar:Terry      from:01/10/2003 till:end           color:lguitar
  bar:Tim        from:01/09/2006 till:end           color:bass
  bar:Troy       from:01/01/2007 till:01/01/2008    color:rguitar
  bar:WillH      from:01/01/2007 till:end           color:drums
  bar:WillSH     from:01/01/2009 till:end           color:key
LineData =
  at:01/11/2000 color:black layer:back
  at:04/03/2003 color:black layer:back
  at:03/09/2006 color:black layer:back
Arlindo 88 (talk) 11:11, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A consensus has established that the current-style chart is acceptable; that a graphical chart is not needed--a table is fine. ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 15:28, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you're the only one here aying it isn't. I challenge you to show me this consensus you speak of. Crisis.EXE 02:52, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, he's not. I am as well. Unless there is further discussion showing why this new system should be implemented, do not readd. You were bold with the change, the change was reverted, now discuss. See WP:BRD. — Huntster (t @ c) 03:31, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Members Timeline
Talk:Spring Lake Regional Park

message: Does anyone know the history of the huge earthen dams around Spring Lake? Or the massive water diversion channels?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stuartdole (talk • contribs) 20:51, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The main dam was built in 1963, apparently for flood control.  See Santa Rosa Creek Reservoir. —Stepheng3 (talk) 21:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dams
Talk:Nishan-e-Pakistan

message: I have found no original source that proves Emperor Akihito was awarded the Nishan-e-Pakistan. His name was added to the article in January 2014 with no citation. There have been a few subsequent articles and lists published online that mention Akihito as a recipient, likely using this page as a source without substantiating it. I have added a citation needed tag for now. Nontrivial0 (talk) 23:32, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emperor Akihito 

message: He was given the Nishan-e-Imtiaz, not Nishan-e-Pakistan. http://www.rediff.com/news/1999/jul/14dilip1.htm. Nishan-e-Pakistan is only given to Foreign Heads of State (technically people with Head of State status ... so some religious leaders can get it). Removed his name from the list.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kas1234567 (talk • contribs) 10:32, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dilip Kumar 

message: I (removed) a section from this article, as there is already an article about  Hilal-e-Pakistan with more information. If you have any question, concerns or feedback, please ping me. Thanks TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 18:13, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section removed 

message: Hi, please move Recipients of the Sitara-e-Pakistan section to another related article and keep Nishan-e-Pakistan award for the single purpose only i.e recipients of Nishan-e-Pakistan only.  thanks. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 03:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove section 
Talk:1st Tank Brigade (Ukraine)

message: Buckshot06, Kges1901, I've found out most of Ukrainian units were renamed back in November 2015, removing Soviet decorations. News: , Source: .
Does it mean all those orders of Ukrainian units should be removed at all? Or is it applied just for unit's name? --VoidWanderer (talk) 16:27, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be covered in the history section, exactly as it is done on this page. [Date] original award and reason ; [Date Nov 2015] removal of orders. Buckshot06 (talk) 20:28, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the information to all affected units we have articles on. Kges1901 (talk) 22:06, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

text: Yes. Kges1901 (talk) 08:09, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brigade was renamed 
Talk:Pan Feng

message: About the line "吾有上将潘凤，可斩华雄". The word "上将", literally meaning "High General", implies a high ranking soldier/general. Simply making that "brave warrior" just doesn't sound quite right. I am confident that my translation is better than the original one, but any suggestions are welcomed. Blodance the Seeker 06:46, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Quantumentanglement

message: This matter may now be moot.  Rklawton (talk) 02:34, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone will need to restore everything here (it appears I'm not able to do so), while the discussion did end, the conduct of the editors involved needs to be observed with scrutiny and the request needs to be archived for future reference. Thank you. Quantumentanglement (talk) 02:42, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Human impact on the nitrogen cycle

message: The original author had written the article using references like (Author 2000) instead of inline references. I've sorted them all out and found a link to the papers. There was one problem in that there were two (Galloway 2003) possibilities in the bibliography. I've merged them both into one, this isn't ideal but it's no worse than it was before. There were a couple of links in the bibliography that weren't cited in the article so I've moved them to a Further reading section. Smartse (talk) 04:59, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: This article is too technical. Someone with subject matter expertise should translate the study conclusions into something laypeople can understand. Most importantly, the lead section should summarize these conclusions. Also, there is a lot of language along the lines of "N saturation can result in ..." The question is not so much what human impact can have, but what human impact does have. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 22:09, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical 
Talk:Cardiac input

message: Cardiac input is theory that inverts the [Adolph Fick] solution for [Cardiac Output][Systole]. Systole is about half of the time phase of a single [heartbeat]. Diastole represents the opposed and remaining half of the same heartbeat.
Archived and present day European thought suggests [diastole] as a [Windkessel] and contains a vast wealth of understanding of the exchanged compliance of the peripheral vascular and pulmonary beds.
Other theories regarding diastole are considered as left sided determination of flow across the mitral valve, split into two time phases, [E wave][Early filling phase] in health representing 70-80% and [A wave][Late filling phase] in health 20-30%. Decline in E:A ratio is well understood as incrementally compromised LV performance. Echocardiographically proven and disclosed theory well describes performance of the left ventricle [LV].
LVEF remains a substantial but quartered determinant of CO and global performance.
Contemporary volumetric theory echocardiographically well described for many years by many authors lends itself to [Ejection Fraction] or [EF]. EF remains an expedient, inexpensive and noninvasive determinant of systolic heart function readily applied to every day clinical practice. EF is now being examined as right/pulmonary and left/systemic determinants, and may be further studied  as LVEF + RVEF = EF. 
Posit that an EF over 65% indicates a stiff, noncompliant myocardium. Posit degradation of compliance leads to negative inotropic remodeling of the myocardium. Inversion of Fick for diastole remains to be investigated. The [Guyton][sump] model opposed to a systolic [Adolph Fick][pump] is perhaps the first historical mention of the abstract notion of diastole. [Guyton]s' sump and [Windkessel] physiology strongly suggest that diastole is not a passive /relaxation phase.
Injection Fraction [IF] is posited as an indicator of diastolic definition to the extent that Ejection Fraction [EF] is posited as an equivalent of definition systole.  Given EF=ESV/EDV, would the inversion to solve for diastole be IF=EDV/ESV? If so, this could represent promise in further useful noninvasive, inexpensive clinical data regarding diastolic heart failure.--Lbeben (talk) 04:10, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Ahom script

message: :Looks like a good outline of things to come; flesh it out more and it should be pretty good.  Try to be more detailed about what distinguishes it from other southeast asian abugidas.  Some pictures of the actual script would also go really well on this page. 
:--Arjun X3nodox (talk) 04:31, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please add information and references for the script, not the language or the people. There are different articles for each of them.  Chaipau (talk) 12:21, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. Glennznl (talk) 21:15, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I edited a bit and the lead sentence needs work now, ugh! Chaipau (talk) 10:17, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think it looks fine now.Glennznl (talk) 10:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

text: Some suggestions: the "Other Names" content could be integrated into the opening paragraph. Development and Current Usage could perhaps be combined into a single history section. The technical details on the diacritics, etc, in the opening paragraph could be moved into a new section. In this section maybe there could be some samples of Ahom script.Rofflebuster (talk) 14:20, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Queen's Personal Barbadian Flag

message: Why is this article called the Queen's Personal Barbadian Flag and not the Royal Standard of Barbados for Queen Elizabeth II in her role as Queen of Barbados with the symbols of Barbados. The only thing that is personal to the Queen is the disc of the royal cypher in the centre of the flag that is taken from the Personal Flag of Queen Elizabeth II. Mr Taz (talk) 21:21, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal Standard of Barbados
Talk:Queen's Personal Jamaican Flag

message: Why is this article called the Queen's Personal Jamaican Flag and not the Royal Standard of Jamaica for Queen Elizabeth II in her role as Queen of Jamaica with the symbols of Jamaica. The only thing that is personal to the Queen is the disc of the royal cypher in the centre of the flag that is taken from the Personal Flag of Queen Elizabeth II. Mr Taz (talk) 21:24, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal Standard of Jamaica
Talk:Operation Sea Angel

message: The detail in this article is small enough that 1991 Bangladesh cyclone should just include the whole paragraph.  Therefore it should be merged. — jdorje (talk) 03:23, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. johnpseudo 14:24, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I'll merge it. --Hurricanehink (talk) 02:35, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Visual Interactive Voice Response

message: This is an unprofessional value. Video IVR is the name used to clarify the subject to Telecommunication professionals who know IVR but not 3G based services.
The right term is IVVR (Interactive Voice and Video Response).
Please use your Wiki internal tools to redirect this value to a value titled IVVR.
: The above comment was somewhat correct, in that Video IVR was a subset of the technology for Visual IVR, as distributed by Microsoft and other companies. So I've moved the page and adjusted the information to make the page more broad. Jeremy112233 (talk) 18:44, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Korovai

message: ...that korovai is a traditional Ukraіnian wedding bread, baked from wheat flour and decorated with braids?--Riurik(discuss) 21:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  dyk suggestion 

message: Here is a discussion about the history and etymology of the word "korovai" that goes all the way back to Greco-Roman traditions. The discussion is in Russian, and they do not cite sources. Like many traditions, there are many versions of korovai depending on the region.
http://otvet.mail.ru/question/3129683/
http://otvet.mail.ru/question/11434543/
If someone has enough time and interest, maybe these people can be contacted for their sources, because they sound like they know what they're talking about. Or maybe a translation of this page would suffice. USchick (talk) 01:20, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  another suggestion 
Talk:Uncle Liam

message: I have one minor question in regards to the information regarding this individual.  If Liam is brother-in-law to both Phyllis and Elaine he cannot be great-uncle to Bekka Wallis who is the daughter of a sister of John Grey.  Nor can the reverse be true.  It follows then that if the former case is true, it is definitely true that Liam cannot be a brother-in-law to the Greys through John Grey. If someone could inform me which is the correct version I will edit the page accordingly.  Strongholyscholar (talk) 03:35, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Naich (clan)

message: Naich tribe is a brave tribe.mostly Naich live in all provinces of PAKISTAN.like KPK,Balochistan,Sindh and Punjab.Mostly are settled in lower Punjab(south Punjab).Naich is a lively tribe.
Some of Naich tribe settled in near Jampur,district Rajanpur,punjab,pakistan.
As mostly people know MALIK UMER FAROOQ NAICH.He is a famous and popular man of this tribe. Faiq Farooq (talk) 19:03, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  NAICH tribe
Talk:Women's rugby union

message: The article states that "the UK's Daily Herald newspaper includes photographs of girls' teams training in Thornhill, near Dewsbury in Yorkshire in 1965, and at Tadley in Hampshire in 1966."  But the Daily Herald ceased publication in 1964 and was relaunched later that year as The Sun. This apparent chronological anomaly needs to be straightened out or explained.--ShelfSkewed Talk 17:00, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daily Herald 
Talk:List of prehistoric foraminifera genera

message: I removed the irrelevant suggestion regarding needed references appearing in the previous edit. Such garish notices detract from the professionalism of articles. Not that the concern raised isn't valid. But these are not homework papers to be corrected. If you believe something essential is missing, such as inline references, add them your self. But let's let those subjective reminders die by the way side. J.H.McDonnell (talk) 00:48, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Its not a "suggestion" its a policy, (decided in by the wiki community) that allows the readers of articles to actually identify the sourcing of information in an article.  Its also following the peer-reviewed article formatting that uses inline citations.  If you add information, add an inline template citation.  its not going to hurt you.--Kevmin § 14:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference suggestion
Talk:Hurricane Ridge

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20080613213058/www.hurricaneridge.net/mountain.htm and http://web.archive.org/web/20080602173823/www.hurricaneridge.net/club.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 17:50, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Template talk:Heraldic achievement/chart

message: This ... really does not look very nice. I think it's something to do with the lack of contrast where the blue link text covers the black lines of the diagram? —SamB (talk) 05:21, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried to clear it up a little bit. Chicbyaccident (talk) 19:57, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crowded 

message: Do you mnd to at least move out deleted detailed information to other templates, please? PPEMES (talk) 11:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stripped
File talk:TubeMapZ1 TFL.png

message: It says it has no free alternative. I disagree. I think that a geographically correct map of Zone 1 would work. It also says it is little use as a map but I can use it easily. --91.84.86.19 (talk) 17:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Image:TubeMapZ1 TFL.png]] 

message: Transport for London do not claim copyright for the tube map in any place where it is published (either as wall posters or 'give away' pocket maps.)  This makes sense because London Transport used the map for years even though they had no claim to the copyright (If the copyright belonged to anyone, it was to Harry Beck as he did not conceive it in London Transport's time).  DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 19:10, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright status
Talk:Nora B-52

message: *What is the diameter of the gun? Some sources (for example the first link on the page http://www.odbrana.mod.gov.rs/odbrana002/63-65.pdf) say it is 155mm while others say it is 152mm. Also on the German page it says that the M84 NORA had 152mm gun, while the NORA B-52 has 155mm gun. Also in the http://www.odbrana.mod.gov.rs/odbrana002/63-65.pdf it is said that the 152mm gun and a Russian M-46 130mm gun converted to 155mm were considered as the gun for Nora B-52. It continues to say that the 155mm gun was used on Nora B-52. АндрејаКо (talk) 22:40, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Users 

message: Dear wikipedians, to me the article needs some editing as it reads a bit "funny" as if it had been automatically translated into English from another language. Can anyone please help? Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 15:11, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text needs editing 

message: # What does the “52 calibre” signify?
# What units does the “52 calibre” employ?
--Ronbarak (talk) 18:09, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is Calibre? 

message: Militaryfactory.com is paraphrasing Wikipedia articles thus representing unreliable source. Loesorion (talk) 23:04, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreliable source used in this article
Talk:Isabella (grape)

message: Susceptible to which mildew?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.224.120.26 (talk) 20:57, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Susceptible
Talk:The golden compass

message: This page was twice altered to redirect to the 2007 film based on this book instead of the book itself.  But it is more logical to link to the original work rather than a later derivative.  Indeed, this is the prevailing practice on Wikipedia: for example, The Fellowship of the Ring redirects to Tolkein's book, not to the movie.
:I agree that it should redirect to the novel, and had already changed that a week or so ago. seresin ( ¡? )  04:45, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Tolkien film and novel shares the same name. That's not the case here. When I typed in The Golden Compass, I expected to and wanted to read the article on the film. Imagine my surprise to find it redirected to a novel with a different name. There's already a link to the novel in the very first line of the article to the film. --60.241.170.216 (talk) 12:48, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

text: When dealing with multiple works of the same name, it is, of course, logical to link to the original work. However, this is not Lord of the Rings, and the novel was never even intended to be called The Golden Compass, as is stated in the articles. Add to this the fact that His Dark Materials: Northern Lights actually redirects to the film, while all the ones with the film's title redirect to the novel, and you have a complete redirection mess. I'm sure that those who are interested in the novel can click the link in the first sentence of the film's article. It is also a good idea to keep in mind that redirection is for common spelling/wording/capitalization mistakes, not for correcting perceived intentions. --24.78.39.156 (talk) 02:56, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirection: To the Book or to the Film?
Talk:Todd Herzog

message: Sure, he won Survivor: China, but I'm concerned that his Dr. Phil appearance and alcoholism may or may not make him more notable than what's he's very known for, despite meeting WP:SUSTAINED. Sure, the Dr Phil show may have garnered him great attention from Survivor fans and viewers of Dr. Phil... and non-fans. However, I don't think many guests of Dr. Phil are notable just for appearing on the talk show. Even if they are, certain Dr. Phil guests who hasn't done anything else noteworthy IMO may still fail WP:BLP1E... or WP:BIO1E, whichever applies more. Speaking of which, I'm unsure how exempt from BLP1E the winner is. I'm unconvinced that his current marital status can save the article either. George Ho (talk) 16:53, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Biscione

message: Usually considered to be eating a child... AnonMoos (talk) 03:55, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Child or man, eating or disgorging?

message: Woodward's Heraldry (if memory serves) suggests that it is an eel (anguilla), canting for a lordship of (something like) Anguivaria. —Tamfang (talk) 17:58, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  heralds don't pun ... 

message: Dietrich von Bern links here as this is part of his Legend. Why no mention here?2601:806:4301:C100:C84:2660:4EA2:BD28 (talk) 04:08, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dietrich? 

message: Apparently Museo Storico Alfa Romeo (Alfa Romeo Historical Museum) says the Alfa Romeo logo depicts a human emerging from the snake and not the other way around. This is supposed to represent the process of man reinventing himself . The following article discusses this and several other interesting tidbits of knowledge about the logo's history. I do not read Italian so I cannot verify the sources linked to in this article but hopefully this can help the editors of this article who are fluent in Italian. 
: * https://jalopnik.com/alfa-gives-us-the-official-line-on-whats-up-with-their-1627173581
172.88.130.119 (talk) 15:08, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biscione: swallowing child/man OR birthing child/man ?