lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Group home

message: There is clearly another meaning of group home- is that addressed somewhere else?----Corrie2723 03:58, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've rewritten the article. --W.marsh 13:52, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is the Victorian colonies references necessary or even relevant?
98.206.96.128 07:01, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Victorian Colonies

message: Currently there is one see also link: one specific group home.  This doesn't seem useful.  Any objection to removing it?  --Alynna (talk) 02:09, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's clear that it will eventually need to be removed, since there are many group homes, and it's prohibitive to list them all here.  And categories are a much better solution for listing specific instances of a general concept.  But this article is pretty short right now, so I don't mind if it stays until the article expands a bit more.  --Underpants 23:00, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also 

message: This seems to be a terribly US-centric article.  Which state did the mandating? What on earth is "deinstitutionalization"? Philip Trueman (talk) 12:30, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I'm in the UK, where the term "group homes" isn't in common use, and found this article frustrating as it rather assumes a fair amount of US-specific knowledge. I'm not knowledgeable enough about the subject to make extensive edits myself, so I'll add the Globalize-US tag to the article in the hope that someone with more knowledge will do so. Loganberry (Talk) 17:49, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{t1|Globalize}} ? 

message: First off, the start of the page is saying that all American group homes are for adults with serious health complications, which is 100% incorrect, and is lying that everyone in a group home is a grown up, and that they're all seriously sick physically, or seriously challenged physically.
Then, it lies that group homes almost always have only six people in them. Group homes for children are significantly more than six kids per group home. Six kids is foster care, not a group home.
Whoever wrote the top paragraphs of this page doesn't know what they're talking about at all. And, the top of the page lies that that information is the United States' present norms, which is completely bogus. Most group homes in the U.S. are for children, and most of those kids are healthy.
Most group homes in the U.S. are for children in need of families, and have much more than six "residents." And, adult group homes don't require a high severity of handicapment, nor are all the disabled adults in group homes physically disabled, many are mentally disabled either from retardation, or from a Serious Mental Illness. Whoever wrote the article as it presently is vandalized the page, in my opinion.
--184.101.207.130 (talk) 03:17, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adult Bias Problem & Misinformation Biased Against The Handicap
Talk:Austen submachine gun

message: With the Austen Mk 1 this statement is totally incorrect
"They remained in service as a standard weapon of the Australian Army until 1966."
The weapon was unloved, so to speak, and it was the Owen Machine Carbine, OMC, which was the standard weapon till 1966.
The Austen was only used in WWII. The OMC was used right through from 1942 to the early stages of the Vietnam conflict, 1966, till it was replaced by the F1.
This need correcting.
TDR 15:59, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  error in statement 
Talk:4th/19th Prince of Wales's Light Horse

message: The article states that the regular component of 4/19 PWLH (1 Troop, A Sqn) was removed from the order of battle in 1965 prior to its deployment to Vietnam when it became 1st APC Troop. Can this be confirmed? According to Paul Anderson in When the Scorpion Stings (2002:2) 1 Troop, A Sqn, 4/19 PWLH  was not redesignated as 1st APC Troop until March 1966. AustralianRupert (talk) 13:48, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Regular component
Talk:The Ring magazine Fight of the Year

message: I think this category should be added to succession box data.  I did so for Tony Lopez.  I think all other fights should be in succession boxes for both fighters.
Something for someone who knows more about Wiki-formatting to check on and add:  In their 75th Anniversary Issue RING Magazine listed all of their fights of the year from 1922 to present.  Here they are:
'22 - Greb v Tunney
'23 - Dempsey v Firpo
'24 - Tunney v Carpentier
'25 - Greb v Walker
'26 - Dempsey v Tunney
'27 - Dempsey v Tunney
'28 - Loughran v Lomski
'29 - Schmeling v Risko
'30 - Kid Chocolate v Kid Berg
'31 - Schmeiling v Stribling
'32 - Canzoneri v Petrolle
'33 - Schmeling v Baer
'34 - Ross v McLarnin
'35 - Louis v Baer
'36 - Louis v Schmeling
'37 - Louis v Farr
'38 - Armstrong v Ambers
'39 - Louis v Pastor
'40 - Armstrong v Garcia
'41 - Louis v Conn
'42 - Pep v Wright
'43 - Jack v Montgomery
'44 - Jack v Montgomery
71.37.38.42 04:04, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Is Magarito-Cotto really The Ring fight of the year 2008 because boxrec.com has it that in fact Vazquev vs Marquez 3 got FOTY 2008?
http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.php/Ring_Magazine_Fight_of_the_Year
I've been trying to google it but I can't find anything else. I want to say on Miguel Cotto's wikipedia entry that it was fight of the year but now I don't know if it was.
Devonshire_Dan
Bjermaine (talk) 18:33, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  2008 

message: As pro boxers compete as individuals and not as national representatives there is no justification for all those flag icons. I've removed them. See WP:MOSFLAG.  Tigerboy1966  00:57, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flags
Talk:Sentinel tank

message: I've moved the following cmt by User:RAAR Razorback from the main page  to here as there may be some useful images here:
:"http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.php?/topic/269222-ac1-sentinel-historical-review-tier/ (if someone can save the image and upload it would be better than the link. I can't do it right now. :("
 - Thanks for adding this, however in future pls use the article talk page for comments, not the article itself (pls see Help:Using talk pages if you have any questions). Regards. Anotherclown (talk) 12:17, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible image source
Talk:Yūki Masuda

message: I really don't think "Masuda" is the correct name, as this Yuuki Masuda was born in 1979 according to the ANN, I think the person voicing K' is a WHOLE LOT OLDER than this Yuuki Masuda that is in this article.  This is a BIG debate, I can't afford the wrong person to be credited as K' for KOF guys. — Mark Kim (Reply/Start Talk) 04:05, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Aaaa...

message: Too many errors, and it appears that this article was started by someone who's not detail-oriented about the Seiyuu world, so I had to mark it as an article lacking sources. — Mark Kim (Reply/Start Talk) 02:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many errors
Talk:Royal Tasmania Regiment

message: Many overseas military units have alliances with naval vessels. It would be ideal for the Royal Tasmania Regiment to have alliances with all HMAS vessels bearing the name Hobart and Launceston.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.208.203.199 (talk) 06:33, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  HMAS Hobart 

message: Lieutenant Colonel W.M.Martin VD (Volunteer Decoration) CO (Commanding Officer) 12th Australian Imperial (Launceston) Regiment had a 1905 March 'Tasma' dedicated to him by Australian Composer Thomas Bulch
Possible biography arrived Tasmania 1839 in 51st Regiment, took command of Tasmania Regiment 1939-1943 promoted to Lieutenant Colonel 1845 while a visiting magistrate. sailed for India 1845 and promoted Colonel there in 1853 while a visiting magistrate https://stors.tas.gov.au/AI/NS436-1-17
Tradimus (talk) 16:23, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: in popular media
Talk:Harold Edward Elliott

message: It would be interesting to learn the truth of the story about the brigade running out of water in the Sinai from a more objective source. The British had been present and fighting in Egypt for over thirty years by then, and staff officers would have perfectly well aware of how much water men and animals needed. Even in temperate climates (eg. Britain) men will be dying after about 2 or 3 days without water, and in the Sinai Desert it must be far less than that, so they can't actually have been completely without water for very long. Even reading between the lines of the story the water was on its way, albeit half a day later than planned, and you'd have to have watched the movie "Gallipoli" a few times too many to think a British general would actually have preferred to see a few thousand of his own men die of thirst than have his beauty sleep disturbed. Maybe they had been issued with plenty but Australian discipline was poor (poor distribution, missing another arranged supply opportunity, or officers & NCOs were not drilled on the importance of making sure men obeyed instructions) so his men ran out quicker than they should have done, and Pompey threw a tantrum and allowed such a legend to grow up to cover his own or some other Australian's embarrassing cock-up. Who can say? Paulturtle (talk) 22:55, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: G'day, given the prominence of Pompey as an example of a WWI soldier with PTSD who took his own life, I would expect to see it mentioned in the lead. Cheers, Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 04:22, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  PTSD and suicide in lead 

message: Is Harold Edward Elliott really his most commonly used name? Should this be moved over the redirect at Pompey Elliott?  Or Harold Elliott (general) or similar? The-Pope (talk) 02:39, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this article be moved?
Talk:William Holmes (Australian general)

message: What is the process to ask an admin to move a page?
*I can't move "William Holmes (general)" to "William Holmes (Australian general)" )
*"William Holmes (general)" either needs to become a dab page, or a redirect to William Holmes / William Holmes (disambiguation)
Pdfpdf (talk) 04:13, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You could place a 'requested move' on WP:RM, but in this case I think it's a fairly trivial request (makes sense to me), therefore I've just changed your  above to an  - and hopefully one will magically appear here very soon, and see if they can move the page for you. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  04:17, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there is obviously some disagreement over the page's title, please use WP:RM as Chzz suggested. Regards SoWhy 06:06, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page rename
Talk:Frederic Hughes

message: I'm just passing thru reading up on some other stuff - Don't know who if anyone is monitoring this page but it conflicts wildly with the corresponding page on John Antill (general) regarding the Nek assault. I'm going to mention this on that talk page too.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.34.253.85 (talk) 20:38, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting information 
Talk:Edward Hutton (British Army officer)

message: In the 'Later career' section, it states that he was "...appointed Lieutenant-General". I always thought that 'Lieutenant General' was a rank (my emphasis), not an appointment. Indeed, in the same section, at the beginning, the quote is "...appointed commander [the appointment] of 3rd Division"... The normal way of things is to be promoted to the rank and appointed to the post. The 'Lieutenant General' article says that 'Lt G' is a rank. 
Could somebody, with the appropiate reference, do the honours and change it?
RASAM (talk) 14:39, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appointment/promotion
Talk:James Whiteside McCay

message: The article says that McCay customarily wrote his name “M'Cay”. I doubt that very much. He may have typed it so, but I’m quite certain he wrote it “M‘Cay” or “M’Cay”. Yes, it matters. Not a lot, but it matters. 
John W. Kennedy (talk) 16:51, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of signature

message: There's a harv error with McCay, Colonel the Honourable James Whiteside (Autumn 2005), "The True Principles of Australia's Defence". Curly Turkey ¡gobble! 01:55, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harv error 
Talk:Leslie Morshead

message: The lead to this article currently claims that Morshead "is considered to rival John Monash for the appellation of 'Australia's greatest general.'"  There's no reference for this anywhere in the article, and it's not even specified who considers Morshead to be Monash's rival to that title.  Bearing in mind that Monash, unlike Morshead, became a full general and had a town and a university named after him, the claim in the lead should be either deleted or referenced and explained in the body of the article.  - Eb.hoop (talk) 16:30, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the comparison to Monash.  Please don't add it back without a good source.  - Eb.hoop (talk) 17:39, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Australia's greatest general?"

message: Picture in the Alamein section is captioned:
"Morshead (centre) with Winston Churchill (left) and General Claude Auchinleck (right) at the Second Battle of El Alamein in August 1942"
What's wrong:
1) First Battle of El Alamein was over by the end of July
2) Second Battle of El Alamein started at the end of October; by this time, Auchinleck was long gone.
Churchill arrived in Egypt August 3 (Nigel Hamilton, The Full Monty, p.479) and was off to Moscow by Aug 12.  During this time Alexander was appointed as C in C in place of Auchinleck and Montgomery as Army Commander 8th Army. By the time Churchill returned on August 19, Auchinleck was gone.184.66.110.161 (talk) 01:34, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well spotted. Changed the caption. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:45, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad picture caption 

message: What is exact pronunciation of his name? Please add the IPA.Propatriamori (talk) 23:56, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Morse (like Inspector Morse) Head. Someone else will need to do the IPA. Cavalryman (talk) 00:07, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:John Sanderson

message: Why are John's medals all over the place as opposed to in the order of wear? Nford24 (Want to have a chat?) 21:52, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Awards
Talk:Zoque people

message: This is a longish stub, but stub, none the less.  Considering that this tribe have 41,000+ members, much more can be said.  So, with that, how about these thing to help improve this article.
* move the explanation at the bottom of the page into a transwiki information box, with a request for translation help from the es.wiki to the en.wiki.
* provide all the typical ethnic information in a Wiki ethnic box
* provide a population section
* provide a cultural section
* provide a language section
* provide a demographics section
* provide a pre-Hispanic history section
* provide a Spanish Colonial history section
* provide a Mexican history section
* provide a status of the Zoque today in Mexico section
* citations, citations, citations (probably, most will be in Spanish, so if used, be sure to let people know!)
* "External links" and "Additional reading" would be really nice.
CJLippert 22:07, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: To do to improve
Talk:Amalner

message: At every point be it temple or person "famous" word is overused. I believe, it is known (or famous) hence it is having a place here. Although at some points it is okay to have.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Umakantp (talk • contribs) 12:59, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous 

message: There was a reference to a myth where someone tried to internal edit. If it is going to be considered fact, it needs references.  It can be changed to something like "people believe" but I took it out until it can be backed up. Dreambeaver (talk) 21:17, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Myth 

message: You are invited to work on Ahirani language wiki at  Ahirani Wikipedia in incubation . Mahitgar (talk) 04:36, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ahirani Wikipedia in incubation
Talk:Malaysia My Second Home

message: The reference stating that Serbia,Montenegro and Israel points to a link that isn't valid. I removed the reference and replaced it with a citation needed tag. Please put back only if you can find a valid link or reference
99.26.91.2 (talk) 15:37, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference to Serbia, Montenegro and Israel

message: * Started the article for MM2H and will add more content in the coming days. Please feel free to comment. Parnell88 09:32, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction

message: I cleared away the list of links to 'licensed agents', directories and forums. The list will grow endless if all agents put links here. Please provide links to additional and specific info as compared to the Wikipedia page they link from. Ancos (talk) 08:11, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: The article needs a NPOV clean up, especially around the last section in critisms, specifically statements like "This report is obviously wrong." Obvious to who, and why should it be so obvious that the report is wrong. Preferably some decent citations should assist.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.2.148.75 (talk) 12:19, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Would also be nice to know what teh source of "it has been reported" is. Sloppy all round.58.152.80.152 (talk) 04:43, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Henrik Klingenberg

message: Are members of notable bands automatically notable?  Has no other claim to fame. Eluchil404 04:25, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They are. Unless you wanna delete a few thousands of articles.—♦♦ SʘʘTHING(Я) 05:53, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd be happy to; but there is no point in fighting the consenus.  Eluchil404 02:33, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 04:38, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Maybe it could be interesting to note that his name is fully Sweddish, and that he is from Aland, where 95% are ethnic swedes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.253.128.236 (talk) 18:45, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sweddish orign 
Talk:NUS No Platform Policy

message: I added the thing about Nick Griffin coming to Bath. When this actually happens I'll change it to report what actually did happen. Pej
:the text of this is not 100% accurate I don't have a reference for it but I did attend the meeting myself - happy to alter this if it won;t be edited. Mark  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.32.74.60 (talk) 18:12, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nick Griffin at Bath University

message: This article should include more details of the NUS's No Platform policy, which I believe was introduced during the presidency of John Randall (1973-1975). Unfortunately I don't have a reference for that. It also could do with a reference to Nick Griffin and David Irving's invitation to speak at the Oxford Union, and more discussion of the no platform concept and how it differs from restricting free speech.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.175.184.0 (talk) 03:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No Platform
Talk:Union County Industrial Railroad

message: Wow, this is a real nightmare to unravel. Here are the current players:
*UCIR: has contract to operate former Reading Williamsport Line from Winfield to Allenwood, former Reading Catawissa Branch West Milton to Milton, former PRR Bellefonte Branch between Lewisburg and Mifflinburg. Lines from Lewisburg to Mifflinburg and New Columbia to Allenwood out of service account bad track. Controlled by Robey Railroads (now Susquehanna Union Railroad?).
*Lewisburg and Buffalo Creek Railroad: owns track from Winfield to West Milton. Non-operating, although it may have operated tourist service in the past.
*West Shore Railroad: owns out-of-service track Lewisburg to Mifflinburg (operation ceased 1997, track out of service 1999 due to hurricane).
*Union County Industrial Development Corporation: owns track from West Milton to New Columbia (also out-of-service ex-Reading track north of Allenwood)
*Westmoreland Industrial Development Corporation: owns track from West Milton to Milton.
*White Deer and Reading Railroad: owned by SEDA-COG JRA, owns track from West Milton to New Columbia. The local NRHS chapter also runs short excursions over this track.
According to a 1997 STB notice, the UCIR once owned the line from New Columbia to Milton, and was going to sell it to the West Shore Railroad. At the same time, another Robey subsidiary, West Shore Railway Services, Inc. was merged into the UCIR. Since the West Shore ended operations from Mifflinburg to Lewisburg in October 1997, I'm not sure if the transaction came off. The company running Mifflinburg-Lewisburg excursion trips was "West Shore Rail Excursions"; I don't know what relationship it bears to any of the others. 
West Shore Rail Excursions was a privately owned corporation completely separate from West Shore Railroad Corporation.  West Shore Rail Excursions leased the line from Lewisburg to Mifflinburg for excursions.  Other than a speeder and a SW-1 locomotive, all motive power and passenger consist was owned by West Shore Rail Excursions.  The SW-1 locomotive was also eventually sold to West Shore Rail Excursions.  West Shore Rail Excursions also utilized the Lewisburg and Buffalo Creek Railroad property for excursions.
If this hurts, don't worry: the STB confused the WSRR and the WSRy in its original notice and had to print a revision three months later. Any new data on UCIR's former ownership of track and other operations is appreciated. Choess 20:38, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Post-Conrail history of UCIR lines

message: Thanks for all of your hard work, Choess. I tried to clean up the article based on the above and the PA RR map cited. I removed the contradict tag and, since I did not know where else to put it, am dumping the former History section below. I also somehow became logged out while making the edits (it was a long slog), but I made the cleanup edits, Ruhrfisch 05:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Attempted cleanup
Talk:Biretta

message: There are variations in the doctoral biretta.  The 4th ridge is the essential difference.  The piping/tuft is apparently optional, although I suppose anyone who went out of their way to get one would get the colored options too.  The only link a google search for "licentiate biretta" gives is a store, which only has it available with blue tuft/piping for all subjects.   Gimmetrow 04:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: doctoral biretta

message: Does anybody know why the flat side goes on the left? There must be some reason.72.227.136.130 23:48, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Peakless Corner

message: :) - Gobeirne (talk) 07:35, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Kudos! -- Secisek (talk) 07:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Userbox anyone?

message: OK, there is the reference to academic biretta.  It is no longer to be used by a priest who has reached a prelatial rank (cardinal or bishop).
(I don't know the source, but I do remember reading that.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.20 (talk) 20:30, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  academic biretta outranked by prelatial one 