Talk:Hugo Wolf

message: Someone who is a real Wolf scholar and/or not so enamored with the sound of her own voice ought to hack this one apart until it's presentable. Bonus points for finding good PD pictures. Mindspillage (spill your mind?) 09:24, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: On a read-through I think it's quite presentable.  PD pics on Wolf are hard ... maybe a trip to a library to find an old book and a scanner within walking distance of each other... Antandrus  (talk) 23:35, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. Agne 02:38, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Re-Review and In-line citations 

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Composers review of its B-class articles.  This article is B-class, but has some notable room for improvement: expanding the works list, and adding inline citations are the major tasks.  My full review is on the comments page; questions and comments should go here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 13:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review

message: I've come across this quote from Wolf:
* There may be people sufficiently serious to find this opera comic as there are people sufficiently comic to take Brahms's symphonies seriously.
Does anyone know which comic opera he was referring to?  Google has not helped me on this occasion.  --  Jack of Oz [Talk] 02:07, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Quote ID

message: Substituted at 18:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: I was reading this article by the Mahler Foundation and thought it sounded familiar. I realized it was essentially identical to this Wikipedia page. The Internet seems to indicate the MF article was written in 2015, and the edits to this page which are plagiarized were made by a variety of users beginning in 2004, which is why I believe the Mahler Foundation copied Wikipedia rather than, as I initially assumed, vice versa. This is made all the stranger by the fact that the Mahler Foundation doesn't necessarily need and article about Hugo Wolf. Is it a common thing for webmasters to simply copy and paste Wikipedia pages to beef up sites?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohalloranbooks (talk • contribs) 22:27, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes -- not only is it common for other websites to copy our content, but it's encouraged, under the terms of the license. The only thing they did wrong was not attributing the text to us, and indicating that it retains the CC by SA license, so others may use it similarly. Their copyright notice is vague about which of their text is copyright and which is not, and obviously the article on Wolf, being a copy of our article, is not. At least they didn't put a copyright notice on the Hugo Wolf page (you'd be surprised how often this happens -- often enough innocently, by a webmaster who just puts it on every page without thinking). Antandrus (talk) 23:28, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think the Mahler Foundation plagiarized this article