Talk:Catholic Charities USA

message: Some pro-life activists within the Church have criticized Catholic Charities for actively supporting health care reform under Barack Obama, given the fact that such reforms would presumably include provisions making it possible for American secular governments to publicly fund abortion procesdures with taxpayer money, something which is controversial when taken in light of the Church's strong opposition to direct abortion.  ADM (talk) 10:31, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Health care reform under Barack Obama

message: Catholic Charities is one of the biggest charity organizations in the world and does an extreme amount of good in fighting poverty, yet the article only focuses on criticism/accountability/controversies.  I believe this should be expanded to show slightly less anti-Catholic bias... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.19.100.110 (talk • contribs) 26 May 2010‎
:I've tagged the section for cleanup using .  As it is a legitimate criticism that is supported by multiple reliable sources, the section shouldn't be removed entirely; but, at the same time, the current wording places undue weight on that content, which currently represents more than half the content of the article. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:43, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: When and until more history is added to this page the clearly Gay Agenda section should be edited down to a much less prominent section. The page is currently unbalanced and reads as a propaganda page for the Human Rights Campaign. All this criticism could easily be placed on their own pages and no one would complain. 19 September 2012
Quite the opposite, I'd say. Sections don't need to be built in tandem. Often one section is beefier than another. The question is whether or not the material gives undue weight to material in relation to the subject of this entry, Catholic Charities, or in relation to other opinions (if we were discussing contrasting opinions, which we are not), not undue weight in proportion to what other editors have gotten around to writing. And your real objection is to the content of the section in question. I tried to write it with precision and attention to what the participants actually said and did. I think shortening it -- and I assume it is the Boston section that is really at issue -- would do an injustice to the participants, a group that includes some noteworthy people who should not be short-changed, including Cardinal O'Malley and Gov. Romney and Bryan Hehir, who is the author of the centenary history of the organization. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 21:49, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue weight of criticism section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Catholic Charities USA. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130219122908/http://www.catholiccharitiesusa.org/who-we-are/our-leadership/board-of-trustees/ to http://www.catholiccharitiesusa.org/who-we-are/our-leadership/board-of-trustees/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101124083904/http://catholicroundtable.org/blog/2010/10/catholic-charities-usa-celebrates-100-years/ to http://catholicroundtable.org/blog/2010/10/catholic-charities-usa-celebrates-100-years/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091127144019/http://www.catholiccharitiesusa.org/NetCommunity/Document.Doc?id=1924 to http://www.catholiccharitiesusa.org/NetCommunity/Document.Doc?id=1924
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110220081123/http://www.catholiccharitiesusa.org/Page.aspx?pid=2278 to http://www.catholiccharitiesusa.org/Page.aspx?pid=2278
*Added  tag to http://www.catholiccharitiesusa.org/document.doc?id=3152&ei=9qNfUPX2NOHu0gHQoIGQCw&
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:31, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified