lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Radicalz

message: Who's to say that their size didn't "translate well" ?
Why is it assumed that their size "translate well" in Canada? 
Paul Heyman didn't "introduce" lucha libre to the US. 
This section sounds like a kayfabe article in PWI. 
I recommend something like this, "Benoit, Malenko and Guerroro toured together in Mexico, Japan, Canada and the US before Paul Heyman booked all three to ECW. During this time, the three would face off regularly. In ECW they met Perry Saturn, but he did not become a member of the group until they all signed contracts with WCW." 
Instead of
"Benoit, Malenko and Guerrero toured the world before signing with WWE. Their lack of size didn't translate well in the United States, but their respective styles were popular in countries like Mexico, Canada and particularly Japan. The trio would face off repeatedly, forcing them to spend a lot of time together. Their matches were usually considered to be so good that they were frequently booked in the same matches again and again.
They caught the attention of Extreme Championship Wrestling Booker Paul Heyman. Heyman was keen to introduce the Mexican lucha libre style to U.S. professional wrestling fans, and he saw Guerrero as an ideal example of this. He also loved the purist, technical styles of Benoit and Malenko. So Heyman booked all three men in his company. It would be here that they met Perry Saturn, but he did not become a member of the group until they all signed contracts with WCW."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shackleferd (talk • contribs) 23:03, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Pre-WCW section 

message: On the basis that they were effectively the same group, just performing under a different name when in different companies, I propose merging Revolution (WCW) with this article, The Radicalz. For comparison, let's take the Legion of Doom (wrestling), also known as the Road Warriors. While they used different alias in different promotions, ultimately they're both covered in the one article. The same should apply for Revolution/Radicalz. CeltBrowne (talk) 20:11, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger discussion
Talk:Iglesia ni Cristo/Archive 3

message: As I try to edit this page, there's a sign that says "This page is 106 kilobytes long. This may be longer than is preferable; see article size."
It's also harder to read through this long talk page. Who here feels we should separate the talk page into different sub-pages? For example, we can have a talk:Iglesia ni Cristo/links for the discussion of the links page, talk:Iglesia ni Cristo/politics for the politics section, etc. I've seen it work with other active talk pages.
* Just split it into multiple archives (e.g. Talk:Iglesia ni Cristo/Archive 1). We never know when the article might be reorganized. Just a suggestion. Ealva 00:13, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Splitting the talk page into sub-pages

message: I've wondered this to the time back when I was an INC Member, but never got around to asking. If the officers make up the church administration, such as the deacons and ministers, do the choir members, financial officers and the secretariats make up the administration too, even though their positions are largely non-administrative?--Onlytofind 16:41, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about offices in the INC

message: Will the more exprerienced of the WP members explain to me what happened on this edit history page:  http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Iglesia_ni_Cristo&diff=15460839&oldid=15460363
The reason I ask is that it looks to me like Onlytofind added a line about a report about FYM stealing a turkey...and then the next edit on the edit history page (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Iglesia_ni_Cristo&action=history) contains this quote by Onlytofind:  "Emico, you are not the judge on factuality for this article. Why not let Ealva and Glenn take a look at this? Also removed turkey accusation for lack of proof and dubious necessity."gcessor 04:03, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: A question concerning edit history

message: We've got a few vandals here:
* 192.55.40.96 , 192.55.40.97 , 192422212  seems to be one person, judging from the edit history
* Emico 
* 203.190.89.130 seems to be a member of Ang Dating Daan who has every reason to discredit the INC
Beware of their edits. Ealva 06:53, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandals in the INC articles 

message: I did a few redirect fix-ups for the Felix, Erano, and Eduardo Manalo articles:
* Felix Manalo, Felix Malano, and Felix y. manalo now redirects to Felix Y. Manalo, also moved the discussion page
* Eduardo manalo (small M) now redirects to Eduardo V. Manalo
* I also listed the old redirects in the redirects for deletion page  (did I do it right?)
I hope this cleaned up the articles a bit. Ealva 02:22, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uniform Redirects
Talk:Rufus Shinra/Archive 1

message: The line in the opening part of the article is inaccurate as Rufus was obviously not wielding a shotgun. If that were the case he wouldn't have been able to shoot it with one hand while falling. Another factor is that he would have blown Kadaj's freaking head off at the same time. A shotgun shoots in a spray pattern not a straight shot. Anyway my point is if anyone has a point to argue this it may or may not change but I didn't want to be nit-picky about it.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by LaYF (talk • contribs) .
:This is Final Fantasy; things can happen which can't happen in real life, such as using a shotgun one-handed.  In the game itself, when you fight Rufus and he shoots his gun at you, his attack is called "Shotgun".  "Shotgun" is clearly written on the screen when he attacks you.  I could probably come up with a screenshot from the PC version if it was absolutely necessary.  Also, note that a shotgun can be loaded with solid-shot, in which case it would fire a straight shot, though not with any particular accuracy.  Kasreyn 22:38, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The weapon he used in Final Fantasy 7 was definitely a shotgun. The weapon he used in Advent Children was clearly not a shotgun, but some variety of pistol. It wasn't the same weapon. Schicksal 23:46, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd have to agree. The weapon utilized in Advent Children differed greatly in appearance to the weapon Rufus used in the original game. Not only that, the shotgun in FF7 made a distinct shotgun-like noise (and even effect), whereas the gun used in AC was most noticably making the "noise" of a pistol. For developers who prided themselves on attention to detail, I hardly think they'd attach a pistol noise to a shotgun. Though I don't blame the confusion. The pistol in AC has an awkwardly long barrel. MidnightWolf 09:26, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In the Reunion Files book, it indicates that Rufus' gun in AC is a "special model" and is "cutting-edge Shinra technology". Obviously because it's designed to "fold" open and close to keep it easily concealed. WtW-Suzaku 16:00, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a Shotgun
Talk:Batman Forever

message: Dr. Chase Meridian is mentioned five times, with 4 different links:
 1. Dr._Chase_Meridian → List_of_Batman_supporting_characters#Film
 2. Dr._Leslie_Thompkins     !!
 3. no link
 4. Dr._Chase_Meridian → List_of_Batman_supporting_characters#Film
 5. List_of_Batman_supporting_characters
Worth noting that the #Film fragment identifier works well only because Dr. Meridan is the first item in the unordered list following the “Film” mw-headline. Sbauman (talk) 17:00, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Chase Meridian inconsistencies
Talk:Military history of Argentina

message: I'm trying to turn this article into a list of argentine military conflicts involving foreing armies. Internal affairs like military coups should be part of another article. I think with the recent adding of the "almost war" with Chile in 1978 stoped by the Vatican before the breaking of armed forces, the list is complete. The task now is to expand details and stuff. --Furgonero 14:19, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: top
Talk:Ma Tau Wai

message: Was Ma Tau Wai are walled village? — Instantnood July 4, 2005 08:06 (UTC)
:I think so. HenryLi 19:04, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Cattle Depot is actually near Ma Tau Kok and To Kwa Wan, but not in Ma Tau Wai. — Instantnood July 4, 2005 08:07 (UTC)
:Yes. Matthew hk (talk) 00:31, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: (no title)
Talk:The Roly Mo Show

message: I have just removed the following from the page:
* "Little Bo is pink and obviously named after Little Bo Peep" (this is an assumption, with no evidence to back it up)
* about Rockitt: "but unlike the other characters appears as himself (i.e. a puppet)".  All the characters appear as themselves, so the statement is superfluous.
Feel free to discuss. Burns flipper 08:43, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the article is better with your changes, but I think I can explain the meaning of "but unlike the other characters appears as himself (i.e. a puppet)". The Fimbles appear in the Roly Mo show as cartoon characters in puzzle games; Rocket, on the other hand, appears in the Roly Mo show "as himself (i.e. a puppet)" in the main part of the show. --JimmyTheWig 14:14, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarifications
Talk:Battle of Groix

message: Not a hoax. This is one lazy stub though.
Not so lazy, anymore. 23:08, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to the entry for HMS Royal George, there was no Royal George in commission during the battle. Where is the error? 23:08, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Which Royal George?

message: That's which Royal George. V. Joe 23:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Royal George (1788)

message: This battle is actually the Second Battle of Groix Island. The first battle had taken place a few days earlier on 15 June, where Villaret de Joyeuse chased another small British squadron under the command of Vice-Admiral William Cornwallis. --Ken Johnson 17:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Distinguish between the two subsequent battles

message: Hello, 
it seems that since , we've had a Révolutionnaire mentionned in the French fleet. Since the frigate Révolutionnaire served in the Royal Navy at the time and the 110-gun Révolutionnaire (ex-Bretagne) was in no condition to sail at the time, I can't really see what ship is mentioned there. Would it be HMS Révolutionnaire misplaced in the French rather than the British squadron? Rama (talk) 09:09, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that is correct, yes.--Jackyd101 (talk) 00:21, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Révolutionnaire'' 

message: This is just a notice to any one interested in this article that I will be developing a fully explained and sourced version of this article in my userpace over the next week or so, to be uploaded here once complete. It will be loosely based on the current text, but will be extensively sourced, expanded and rewritten. The orders of battle will be removed for space reasons, and a new article Order of Battle in the Biscay campaign of June 1795 created to replace them. I note that apart from User:Rama there has been no serious activity on this page, but should any one have any comments, requests or questions then please notify me either here or at my talk page and I will do my best to respond and incorporated the results into the finished article.--Jackyd101 (talk) 00:21, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have completed the new article, using British and French sources to create as complete a picture as possible of this battle with the resources available to me. I have also developed the OOB promised above at Order of Battle in the Biscay campaign of June 1795. For the sequence of edits leading up to the new version of text, which I have pasted over the old version, see User:jackyd101/Battle of Groix. I welcome further additions to this article, particularly from French sources, which seem to cover it in even greater detail than the British (unusual for a defeat). I will also be working to integrate more of User:Rama's work into both articles over the next few weeks. Any concerns or questions please send them my way.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:39, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice
Portal talk:Technology

message: Subpage Portal:Technology/Recognized content has been created. It can be used with  in the "Featured article" section. —⁠andrybak (talk) 08:33, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:RECOG]] 

message: Section "Selected pictures" has been overhauled using Template:Portal pictures. Now, Wikipedia:Picture of the day can be used to very quickly and easily add new selected pictures to the portal. You can look up appropriate pictures using the search box below. —⁠andrybak (talk) 09:37, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selected pictures overhaul 

message: 2601:340:8201:4C20:F05F:F751:C62A:2DFB (talk) 03:04, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 04:00, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 July 2022
Talk:Viennese coffee house

message: The German version appears to have a section about beverages typically served, but my German isn't quite up to translating it - could someone possibly add a bit on that here? Deleuze 08:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Beverages?

message: Why does "Pharisäer" redirect here, when it is not even mentioned in the text?
Sejtam (talk) 06:35, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right, doesn't make sense at all. --MisterGugaruz (talk) 13:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  The redirection has been deleted. --MisterGugaruz (talk) 20:13, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pharisäer 
Talk:The Bon Marché

message: This is the discussion page for work on the Wikipedia article about about the former American department store chain Bon Marché. For the discussions regarding work on the article about the famous department store Le Bon Marché in Paris, France, from which the US chain got its name, please visit this page. Thomas Blomberg 21:51, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Doug Church

message: Why has the Virtual reality pionners catergory been retired? Modern 3D owns everything to the guy.
:Because virtual reality and 3D computer graphics are not the same thing. Basically, someone would probably need to be involved in projects such as the Oculus Rift or Sony´s VR goggles, or be working on games specifically made for such devices to qualify for that category. Or be Yokoi and do it all 20 years earlier ;) ~Mable (chat) 08:32, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Technological escalation during World War II

message: Both articles cover about the same subject and Technology during World War II seems to be much more complete.84.231.99.112 18:14, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Technology during World War II? 

message: "Unlike technological escalation during World War I, it was generally believed that speed and firepower, not defenses or entrenchments, would bring the war to a quicker end" Of cource WWI-era people believed in speed and firepower too! It was just those tactics and technologies that were used at the begining of the war and developed during the conflict. Of course it just happened, that defensive technologies and tactics had advanced faster, but this was by accident and not because people "believed that defenses or entrenchments, would bring the war to a quicker end"! The sentence is thus wrong and doesn't do WWI-era leaders and inventors justice. 213.243.181.212 18:50, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was No consensus.  —Wknight94 (talk) 17:24, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  vs. WWI 

message: As others have noted, there are many problems with this page; I believe it should just be merged, that way there will be a more comprehensive article on what is essentially a huge legacy of WWII.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.32.110.42 (talk) 22:47, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Will this page be merged?
Template talk:See details

message: I think this template should be formatted
 Main article: Foo
and moved to Template:Main. Fredrik | talk 11:24, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Style

message: The definition of  has been changed.  Discussion in Template_talk:Main#Template_usage_changed. (SEWilco 04:35, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of Template:Main changed
Talk:Palo mayombe

message: I think that discussion is limited here due to the paucity of editors in this area and hence a lack of people interested in the matter. However, as an active editor in this area (African diasporic traditions), i would like to simply present a conclusive case that  Palo Mayombe and Palo Monte should be merged and a disambiguation page or disambiguation links must be created to distinguish the two forms of Palo religion from the Palo, Leyte page. I urge that this be done as soon as possible, because i am working in a bunch of pages that should reference Cuban Palo religious traditions collectively, but i have so far been unable to make the links because i lack a firm, decided-upon place for those links to land. As a hopefully fluent writer,  i cannot work up sentence structures that direct readers to both Palo Monte and Palo Mayombe, but directing them to Palo as a collective religion lands them in the Philippines. I suggest creating Palo (religion) containing the merged Monte and Mayombe texts and Palo (Leyte) for the city to fix the problem. SPEEDY resuloution by someone with administrative experience and skill is required. Thanks.  I am also posting this to Commander Keane's talk page, as the Commander has been extremely helpful to me in the past.  NOTE: As part of the proper names of these religions, both Monte and Mayombe should be capitalized. Catherineyronwode 18:43, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please Merge and Disambiguate with Palo (Leyte)
Talk:Michael Lynch

message: the following Michael Lynch, thinking "energy consultant" too vague to establish notability.
:* Michael C. Lynch Energy consultant 
--zenohockey (talk) 20:15, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the name because he was the most vocal opponent to the peak oil moment, but since I have no references outside news quotes and his own business, not much could be said by me. Notability is a funny concept to me. Entertainers get a free ride for their own self-promotion and real people affecting business and government policy on vital issues have to be defended as notable by some magical criterion, not that any sane person would want to have a wiki-page on them anyway! WELL, thanks for moving it to talk here. Maybe someone else will be interested in him too, and more motivated than me. Tom Ruen (talk) 23:48, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

text: Interestingly, just looked, he's (open)-wiki-linked on peak oil as Michael_Lynch_(economist). Tom Ruen (talk) 00:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michael C. Lynch 

message: Michael Lynch has bachelor's and master's degrees in political science from M.I.T.  He began working on petroleum economics in 1977 and has continued in that field since.  He was a Research Associate at the Energy Laboratory at M.I.T. in the 1980s and in the 1990s, a visiting fellow at the Center for International Studies, as well as Executive Director for the Working Group on Asian Energy and Security.  He spent about 3 years at WEFA, then DRI-WEFA after a merger, where he was chief energy economist.  (DRI-WEFA is now part of IHS Markit).  Subsequently, with Ronald Denhardt, he formed Strategic Energy & Economic Research, where he is still president.  He is also a Distinguished Fellow at the Energy Policy Research Foundation, a Washington based thinktank.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MichaelCLynch (talk • contribs) 11:36, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michael Lynch Background
Talk:Frank Calvert

message: Where is the dispute on the article's neutrality? Stevenmitchell (talk) 06:11, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed neutrality?
Talk:Bordeaux wine

message: Since Claret is just a British name for Bordeaux Wine, it ought to redirect to this page.  At present, someone searching for 'Claret' would be led to think that we only have very sparse information on that topic.  The information on the Claret page should be added here, or to history of Bordeaux wine as appropriate.
Havelock Jones (talk) 12:03, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree The content of claret easily fits into the history of Bordeaux wine, either in Bordeaux wine or History of Bordeaux wine. It might be best to add a little about claret in Bordeaux wine's history section and add fuller detail in History of Bordeaux wine. Encycloshave (talk) 12:56, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

text: Support, the two are synonyms and can be easily worked together. 89.100.207.51 (talk) 17:34, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to merge [[Claret]] with this article 

message: The section on viticulture and winemaking is currently disproportionately long, and I suggest that it contains much more detailed information on these topics than the casual reader will typically want.  Therefore I propose that it be splintered into its own article and replaced with a summary.
Havelock Jones (talk) 09:44, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to split viticulture and winemaking 

message: The wines of:  Bordeaux wine, Burgundy wine, and Champagne have similar price ranges and reputation.
174.22.10.232 (talk) 12:43, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Price range and reputation 

message: The bulk of the text is over a decade old, and the urls are being replaced en masse with links to the Web Archive.  If anybody has the knowledge and inclination to re-write the entire page, I'm sure it would be welcomed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:7117:900:F808:1E4C:34CF:2C47 (talk) 20:18, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Badly in need of an update