lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Duchy of Saxony

message: ;Could this article become part of a new history of lower saxony? feb2006 
—Preceding unsigned comment added by  Foundert  (talk • contribs) 20:23, 26 February 2006 re:user talk: Foundert
re: User:Petri Krohn placed Mergetags:  () 12:14, 20 March 2006, user Talk: Petri Krohn 
No Merge— expand! Historically based articles like this should never be merged together, each has it's own independent context and corpus of literature, public, private, and archival that refers to it within the context of the times. Moreover, the geographic boundaries rarely if ever line up with such successor states, and only when they do should a merge be seriously entertained, but that then orphans the title plus the place in it's times, and buries the context of same trivializing it within the greater article obfusticating understanding by people that run across these terms in references—which is why they (our customers) are looking for more information herein! Q.E.D. <B>Fra</B>nkB 22:25, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: True, but can't this be covered at, let's say, Saxons? Then Old Saxony could be a redirect there. I guess the question is if there is anything to say about Old Saxony besides that it is the original territory of the Saxons. Chl 16:57, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Made some minor deletions. I have deleted statements about the Anglo-Saxon conquest of Britain that were false at a detailed level: e.g., calling Britain "England". The very name "England" is from the name of one of the three invading tribes. Anyhow, detail about the Anglo-Saxon conquest is off topic in an article on the Duchy of Saxony. For one thing, the Duchy didn't exist yet. Hurmata 04:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge suggestion discussion from 20 March 2006 

message: Did Saxe-Wittemberg really partition off of the Duchy of Saxony?  Wittenberg was to the east of the original stem duchy, so it looks like the Duchy was completely dissolved and the Ascanians simply created a new one using the lands they held, including Wittenberg which was previously in the March of Lusatia.  Emperor001 (talk) 14:15, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Saxe-Wittemberg

message: Please take down the coat of arms. It has very very little (if not nothing) to do with the stem duchy in the map so the way it is now is misleading.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.125.249.57 (talk) 21:53, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coat of arms
Talk:Personal unblocking key

message: Should this not be renamed to Personal Unblocking Code?
As it is defined in the standard as "unblocking" not "unlocking"?
Gleffler 20:37, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  Thank you for catching that.  Falcon 01:48, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Actually, I think it should be moved to "Personal unblocking code" as in my (perhaps incorrect) judgement it's not really a proper noun.  It is a generic (for lack of anything better to call it) noun, and as such, shouldn't be capitalized.  There seems to be a widespread misconception that just because a phrase has an initialism it should likewise be capitalized, whereas only initialisms for proper nouns should (e.g., NATO).  However, cleaning up the resulting mess (changing all the articles that link to the improper capitalization) is (to me) a large task--one I don't wish to undertake.  -- Joe (talk) 02:19, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: PUC/PUK is an acronym, and therefore should be capitalized as shown.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.40.111.98 (talk) 18:16, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: PUC naming

message: The phone is blocked permanently when PUK code is incorrect 8 times
NOT 10 Time 
Thanks Shrirang kahale (talk) 11:42, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes should apply 

message: This article talk mostly about PIN not PUK. How many digits contain PUK?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.19.22.24 (talk) 19:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarify
Talk:Cobourg Museum Foundation

message: Hello, Revstani! Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: 
*How to edit a page
*Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
*Picture tutorial
*How to write a great article
*Naming conventions
*Manual of Style
*The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
*Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
*If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this (~~~~); they will expand into your name and the date. You should always sign talk pages, but not articles. If you have any questions, please see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! AnnH ♫ 20:39, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welcome
Talk:Jodi Lyn O'Keefe

message: I believe that this article needs to be cleaned up and improved. Most of the information on this entry cannot seem to be proved and do not seem to contribute to this article. Does anyone else see this the same way? - 12:45, February 26, 2006‎ User:Ajwebb
:Yep, couldn't agree more. I've done some basic stuff, but it needs citations desperately. Things to work on later when I have more time. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 21:11, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: I saw an image was needed. Why can't you use the picture on the page of her Prison Break-character? 145.53.61.225 (talk) 21:06, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 
Talk:Laysan albatross

message: Its my impression that the Laysan Albatross' range only extends north to a bit
past the Aleutians...making it not an Arctic bird.  I won't remove it from this category just yet, but I think that's probably what should be done. Iancrose 20:47, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is mentioned in the main albatross article, I guess the only reason it isn't here is that no one has gotten around to it yet. Or maybe because it isn't specific to the Layason, also having been used about the Black-foot. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 01:58, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It states that the feather hunters of the 1880-1900's lead to the protection of the species and the northwestern Island chain. What I read says that the protection didn't happen until the 1990's so I find this "dubious" that the two are related other than circumstantial. If the editor or anyone with good facts on this could corroborate or fix it.  It seems like a lot of work has been done on this entry and I don't want to just erase that due to what I feel is possible bad info.  Thanks speednat (talk) 04:13, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've provided a reference, which is available through Google books.  The destruction of birds on various atolls, including Laysan, Midway, Guam and various Hawaiian islands, led Teddy Roosevelt to establish the first protected area there—many decades before 1990. See here, pages 36-37 and 57. Or do an "in book" search for "feather hunting". MeegsC | Talk 08:36, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Protection from slaughter
Talk:Placozoa

message: The first sentence says they haven't been observed since 1896, but the rest of the text implies that they have been rather more extensively studied (even gene sequenced) and are "easily collected in tropical and subtropical latitudes around the world." For that reason, I'm tagging this article as contradictory. Deranged bulbasaur 16:08, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is the possible second species Treptoplax reptans that hasn't been seen since 1896, not Trichoplax adhaerens. Mgiganteus1 16:14, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How recently have they been observed? 

message: The article states that have rarely been observed in their natural habitat, but then goes on to say that they are easily collected in tropical regions.  Isn't this a bit of a contradiction??? "Trichoplax were discovered on the walls of a marine aquarium in the 1880s, and have rarely been observed in their natural habitat.[5] The full extent of their natural range is unknown, but they are easily collected in tropical and subtropical latitudes around the world." 129.170.66.218 (talk) 15:42, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rarely observed but easily collected? 

message: Might be useful --Philcha (talk) 14:40, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I found it more relevant at Trichoplax.  May also be possible to use it here but I think more recent molecular work has been done. Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 17:46, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: http://i.imgur.com/UO7VV.png
I wasn't particularly certain if is was unanimously visible, but it concerned me that it existed at all. This seems to have appeared in a year-and-a-half-old edit, ("03:10, 4 January 2011‎ Smith609 (16,141 bytes) (-100) (Automate taxobox)",) when Smith609 seems to have 'automated' the "taxobox"? I'm uncertain how Wikipedia articles are operated, but I wanted to bring this to somebody's attention, since I didn't want to take matters into my own hands, and I was rather certain that it wasn't supposed to look like that. 71.83.238.195 (talk) 07:42, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garbled Text 

message: The page on Eumetazoa specifically excludes Placozoa from that sub-kingdom.  This page, however, lists Placozoa under the Eumetazoa clade.  I personally have no idea which is correct, but it ought consistent!  If anyone knows which is correct, please change the incorrect page.  Ge0nk (talk) 01:27, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eumetazoa 

message: Please, someone make a better lead than to say the Placozoa are 'invertebrate'.88.157.194.238 (talk) 17:53, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead
Talk:Best: The Greatest Hits of S Club 7

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Oppose.  I'm not sure which naming conventions are being cited but normal English grammar rules call for a subtitle to be offset by a colon.  It's done for other albums at Wikipedia that don't have punctuation on the cover such as ABBA Gold: Greatest Hits, Fields of Gold: The Best of Sting 1984-1994, and In Time: The Best of R.E.M. 1988-2003.  —  AjaxSmack   03:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Blackadder's Christmas Carol

message: Patsy Byrne also appears as the future (robotic) version of Nursie, but I don't recall the character's name. Lee M (talk) 18:40, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Patsy Byrne

message: Who added this?  He's not in it!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.231.73.131 (talk) 17:16, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Mmm, good spot. No idea when that got in there. I suppose can see a resemblance, though - case of mistaken identity? Bob talk 00:50, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Kenny Everett?

message: I think some of us ignorant people need some elaboration on what a "moustache shop" is. I just checked the introduction, and it does not say "moustache shop", but simply, "the moustache" -- and the store is named Blackadder Moustache. Does anyone know what this means? (google was no help to me) I don't think this equates to a "moustache shop" either way. Luminifer (talk) 16:33, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless someone explains this, I'm going to put a tag back in. Luminifer (talk) 05:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's called a joke! As in a shop that sells moustaches - absurdist statements are something quite common to the series - just watch Hugh Laurie's narration at the start of the episode "the moustache shop of one Ebeneezer Blackadder". (!) Bob talk 08:45, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly - that's what I thought. The shop does NOT sell moustaches. Given that it is a joke, I don't think it's appropriate to state it as fact in the article. Luminifer (talk) 14:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

text: Sheez, it's an article about a comedy series, and throwaway comment as it might be, that is what his occupation is supposed to be! If you want a citation, however:  Bob talk 21:58, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not a notable source... My only concern is that the line is _very_ confusing, and to American audiences it's not clear where the joke actually lies. It is a confusing statement that needs elaboration or removal. This is similar to when Stephen Fry joked that his middle name was "My bottom is a treasure trove", and it got added to his article as his actual middle name, with a reference to when he said it. This is contrary to reason. Luminifer (talk) 02:00, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

text: I don't really see how it will confuse "American audiences" - are you playing devil's advocate here or something? Anyway, to avoid confusion, or the possibility that somebody might take a situation comedy too seriously, I've put the joke about his occupation in inverted commas. Bob talk 02:32, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I was genuinely confused myself, as to whether it was a joke or whether 'moustache' has an obscure Victorian meaning. Thanks for making it clearer - I think the rewrite does help. Luminifer (talk) 04:22, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Moustache?
Talk:The Beta Band (album)

message: "Jim Steinman ... wasn't too pleased at first and insisted that the band re-record it without the samples, but he soon had a change of heart and the track went ahead" - sorry, but that reads like something from a fanzine. Could someone who has some kind of citeable source for this please incorporate it while rewording the whole paragraph so it comes across as something a little less, I dunno, chatty?  Dom Kaos (talk) 19:43, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No other comments, so I'm deleting that section for the moment. If anyone wants to have a go at re-writing it and adding it back in, go for it!  Dom Kaos (talk) 11:24, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure
Talk:Honey to the B

message: I have the UK album.  The track times (as Windows Media Player gives them) are slightly different - mostly two seconds more than given here.  But I've kept the times as they were, as I suspect that it may be a difference in how the times were measured, and mixing two measurement methods would make the article a little inconsistent. -- Smjg 14:10, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track times 

message: It says on eBay, Amazon and HMV Online that a track called I Want Candy is on this album ... but I've heard of it nowhere else. Is it true?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.32.86.68 (talk) 18:22, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Want Candy? 
Talk:This New Day

message: The track listing is all wrong for this album, it's
No Use Crying
Nature's Law
Target
Sainted
I Can't Come Down
Celebrate
Exploding Machines
Even Smaller Stones
The End is Near
This New Day
and on the latest, World At Your Feet is a bonus track at the end of the album.
Nikevs 09:41, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:In Defiance of Existence

message: I linked the album cover to this article and updated the image page for fair use here.
Kresock (talk) 03:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CD image
Talk:Party

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Suisare and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 20#Suisare until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  TartarTorte 21:03, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Suisare" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Death Cult Armageddon

message: I recently bought this album, and my album art is different than what is on the article page. Mine is a pentagram (upside down) in the center, black background, the artists name at the top and the album name at the bottom. Yet there is no mention of it on the article page itself. Any thoughts on this? § Eloc § 09:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover 

message: Should we add that the album is heavily influenced by Star Wars?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.220.252.190 (talk) 17:46, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Wars? 
Talk:For all tid

message: what it mean "for all tid" ?
In English it translates as "For All Time" marnues 21:44, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  hi 
Talk:Spiritual Black Dimensions

message: Could someone comment on the picture on the inside of the sleeve? It appears to be flesh with fish-hooks in it, but I could never quite make it out. Could be added to the article too. Zuiram 06:14, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Why are Tjodalv and Nagash featured on the sleeve photos if in fact it was Nick Barker and Vortex that played on the album? I was under the impression that Barker and Vortex actually joined after the recording of this album... Demonofthefall 13:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Line-up? 

message: How is this their "first foray" into speed-laden black metal? If memory serves me, Enthrone Triumph was pretty fast-paced. 216.220.90.98 (talk) 15:48, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  speed black metal? 

message: You Shall Not Work! --SwissAirForceSoldier (talk) 23:34, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Puritanical Euphoric Misanthropia

message: Did Simen Hestnæs also do clean vocals on this album? Especially Sympozium and Kings of the Carnival Creation.
Yes he did. marnues 04:17, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ICS Vortex 

message: I bought the album a few days ago and it doesn't have Burn In Hell. Does anyone have information about which versions do and which do not include Burn In Hell and maybe add this information to the article? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.10.20.7 (talk) 11:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: German pressing. -- Borameer ™ 19:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not that simple, but it's the Special Edition (NB 527-0). You may find that song also on the Double-Disc-Version of Death Cult Armageddon (NB 1047-2).JM.Beaubourg 21:16, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burn in Hell 

message: Why is there pro wrestling info in the main section of this article? It should be in a "trivia" section. And who the fuck cares about Type-o Negative? Even if they didn't suck, it's not fucking relevant.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tetsuo669 (talk • contribs) 02:30, 9 November 2007(UTC) 
I stand by my post that this WWF and Type O Negative BS is irrelevant to this album. Vote to remove. Tetsuo669 (talk) 19:45, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrestling Info? 

message: I think the solo at the end of this song should be named the best solo in the album or the best solo from dimmu borgir being ever made, since the end being so deep. Give it a Thought.
Tambocho (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 09:49, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not a forum. Maintain NPOV. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 18:41, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Devils Path: Best Solo?
Talk:You May Now Kiss the... Uh... Guy Who Receives

message: What is the real name of the device news reporter Tom calls Uncle Spinnie dervish? --Abdull 13:18, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reporter device 

message: I wonder why the scene where Ricardo and Stewie spoke in Tagalog was deleted? 61.9.126.41 00:57, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We can only speculate. I'd say 1) because Jasper is wearing a dress, but more importantly, 2) because it contradicts earlier dialogue between Jasper and Stewie which clearly establishes that Jasper and Ricardo have a consenting sexual relationship and there would be no wedding night surprises for Ricardo as Stewie's deleted dialogue would seem to indicate. But that's just me speculating. ShutterBugTrekker 23:09, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted Scene 

message: I'm not sure if it's worth mentioning or not, but I've just cleaned up some problems in the plot summary where an anonymous editor changed the ending to make the episode sound like it was against gay marriage, when of course the complete opposite is true.  The supposed "resolution" was that Jasper and Ricardo are shot for being gay, and that Stewie gives a speech against homosexuality.  Lois also remained convinced that marriage should be between a man and a woman.  Needless to say, it is completely inaccurate.
I'm simply warning people of this, as the vandal may come back, and it's something that's easy to miss if you're just skimming the article.  I doubt it's worth much concern, but seeing as how this page is part of the WikiProject LGBT Studies, I thought it was something that should be brought up.
199.107.215.138 09:35, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-Gay Vandalism 

message: Anyone know where I might find an image of the Paul, the elephant-penguin kid that Moses gets all mad about on the arc in this episode? Thnx in advance! Scott Free (talk) 20:18, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elephant-Penguin Kid 

message: Can somebody explain why this scene with Quagmire singing the Witchdoctor is funny. Or the "purpose".
I especially don't get why McFarlane was willing to pay that money for a joke that doesn't even in the slightest relate to the original topic (signing the petition). Is it something from the lyrics of the song?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.226.141.4 (talk) 00:03, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  10,000$ Joke
Talk:Spot the Pigeon

message: I'm changing: "giving Genesis their second hit" to: "giving Genesis their third hit" as "Your Own Special Way" was a hit, albeit not a very big one.  Yours pedantically, --Cal42 18:14, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure how useful this is. By saying this was their third hit you inevitably have to name the first two, unless the article is part of a series of hits. For instance if you said that Trespass is their second album, you wouldn't have to name the first album because there's a link to it in the category box. Is there a page of "Genesis hits" to link to? What is considered to be a "hit" and what is not? JamminBen 03:21, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Was Match actually a "hit"? I guess the first two were I Know What I Like and Your Own Special Way, but neither song was much of a "hit"... their first true "hit" was Folow You Follow Me. IKWIL and YOSW were singles, but not really hits. Genesis released a lot of singles before FYFM, but none of them made much of an impact and the band was strictly an album-oriented group until the 80s. Match was not the third single - they had released a lot of singles by that point. Scott1329m 11:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, how about ditching the " giving Genesis their x hit" altogether?  It was a top twenty hit in the UK, same as IKWIL if I remember correctly. Your Own Special Way placed about number 43 or something, but still technically a hit.  Might be best just to remove that bit unless someone wants to set up a page for the other singles? Cal42 09:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Works for me. JamminBen 11:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Genesis' third hit

message: The article states that the EP was a seven-inch with variable speeds. Was this how it originally came out in the UK? I've got what appears to be a 1978 pressing from Canada, it's 12", 45 rpm on both sides.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.116.18.216 (talk) 20:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seven Inches?
Talk:Dyson Root Cyclone

message: The introduction to this article is rather vague. It's great to know that this cyclone was developed by some British guy, but what is it??? `T. S. Rice 04:56, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made an attempt to fix this myself actually. I'm not sure if the link in the intro is proper, but it helps describe the topic better, which is what we need, eh? `T. S. Rice 05:21, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Can you cite this? T. S. Rice 00:23, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description/intro