Talk:Rivonia Trial

message: I am putting back the nationalities edited out. It was apartheid, and I think very interesting. Wizzy 14:18, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationalities of those arrested 

message: There are several broken links in the list of defendants. Could some one please fix this? Being a newbie with a dumb sig, I don't know how. Until next edit, SonicBoom95 16:48, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Links 

message: I'm removing the external link to the Warwick University magazine article about Liliesleaf Farm as there's nothing there.  Also corrected the reference to where Mandela was in prison at the time of the Police Raid. He was only moved to Robben Island after the big trial. 
(I'm very happy with my very first contribution which is an article on the Farm. I live only 4 kms away.)  With help from ZAIAN !!
Colinvlr (talk) 20:52, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link 

message: I know that there's a reference, and that the cited reference has the quotation in quotes... but can it REALLY have been "ferment"? --Dante Alighieri | Talk 16:29, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There are a number of sources that use the "foment" language, although there are more (via Google) that seem to use ferment. I do not find this convincing, however, since many of the "ferment" pages clearly have their origins as the Wikipedia article. I've bypassed the issue by removing the quotation altogether. If anyone has access to the audio/transcripts mentioned here, a validated quotation can go back in. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 16:39, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ferment/foment? 

message: "The trial was essentially a mechanism through which the apartheid government could hurt or mute the ANC. Its leaders, including Nelson Mandela, who was already in Johannesburg's Fort prison serving a five-year sentence for inciting workers to strike and leaving the country illegally, were prosecuted, found guilty, and imprisoned. The apartheid regime's attack on the ANC's leadership and organizers continued with a trial known as Little Rivonia, in which other ANC members were prosecuted in accordance with international laws on terrorism. Amongst the defendants in this trial was the chief of MK, Wilton Mkwayi who was sentenced to life imprisonment alongside Mandela and the other ANC leaders on Robben Island."
The Following I feel are POV:
- "essentially a mechanism through which the apartheid government could hurt or mute the ANC"
There is no source stated to prove that it was the reason of the trial.
- "The apartheid regime's"
The term regime is POV as it is debatable on whether it should be called such, unless a legal South African source that says such it remains POV
Unless i here valid counter arguments and sources put in place I will remove the POV terms not before 22 September 2010 --Scottykira (talk) 21:01, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: An Image of the Rivonia 11 (those who stood trial) can be found http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/mandela/accused11.jpg I think it might be a useful addition to the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.132.39.224 (talk) 21:07, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rivonia 11 

message: In the current way the article reads, it seems that Mandela was already arrested by the time the others were arrested and in Johannesburg's Fort prison for inciting workers? It was pointed out to me that he was in fact arrested in a roadblock in Natal subsequent to the other arrests.
The following link also states it: http://v1.sahistory.org.za/pages/governence-projects/organisations/MK/armed_struggle.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CheekyB (talk • contribs) 19:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mandela's arrest 

message: The July 7 2013 article "The Day The Dry-cleaning Van Came to Liliesleaf Farm" has details of the arrest at the farm in Rivonia. It also mentions that the raid may have been from a CIA tip-off although no evidence is provided, except that a CIA operative active in South Africa at the time neither confirmed or denied the allegation. 105.229.59.109 (talk) 21:58, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sunday Times 

message: Nelson Mandela's address to the court is widely regarded as one of the great speeches of the 20th century.  Is there any reason that it goes totally unmentioned in this article? Nandt1 (talk) 03:48, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You might want to take another look - there is a prominent quote from the speech in the "Results" section. It can probably be expanded. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:59, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've created an article about the speech which is now linked from this article.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 19:38, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, Dodger, but a two sentence extract was hardly the kind of substantive discussion the speech and its arguments merited.  Anyway, now we are making progress in the right direction. Nandt1 (talk) 00:26, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Why no discussion of Mandela's speech?

message: Helen,  You reverted my expansion of the treatment of Mandela's speech in this Rivonia trial article, arguing for a concentration on the new article on grounds of redundancy and consistency.  While fully in agreement with you that we should continue to strengthen the new article, I want to make the argument in favor of the modifications I made here.  My main concern, to be frank, was that the text as it stood was potentially misleading.  It spoke of a campaign of violent opposition.  Without the qualification that I inserted (to explain that we are talking about acts of sabotage against property) that statement could very well be misinterpreted to point to acts of unrestricted violence.  I also believe it is appropriate to give a very brief synopsis of NM's statement of the political differentiation between ANC and the Communist Party, which was at the heart of his defense.
I suggest that most people who read this article are not going to follow the link to the new piece.  What is in the trial article will be all they learn about the speech.  As such, without going on at extreme length, the treatment here should be self-contained on the key points.
If you still have issues, let's by all means discuss what should reasonably be in the main trial article before we get into an editing war, but I do plan in the meanwhile to revert back to the somewhat fuller discussion.  Best wishes for your future edits on Wikipedia.  Nandt1 (talk) 13:17, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I will leave it up to the other editors involved in the new article to respond if necessary. At any rate, I am glad that you are now also working on the main article. For what it's worth, and please don't take this as anything other than constructive criticism, your last sentence comes across as patronising at best and sarcastic at worst. Rather just focus on content issues in talk pages. HelenOnline 14:00, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear me.  Neither sarcasm nor patronization intended.  I try to wish the other Wikipedia editors with whom I correspond best wishes with their editing with the intention of promoting good will and civil relations among our editing community.  No one has ever reacted like this before.....  Nandt1 (talk) 14:42, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: This article's discussion of Madela's speech

message: This article and the "I am prepared to die" article offer mutually inconsistent statements vis-a-vis the death penalty: one says that the death penalty was initially requested by the prosecution but they were outmaneuvered, the other says that the prosecution never formally requested the death penalty, but it was understood [how? how reliably?] to be what they really wanted.  One of these statements might be correct, but not both -- and possibly neither.  I have no idea what the facts are -- and restricted access to the sources -- but surely we should be able to achieve greater precision and consistency on this rather basic point? Nandt1 (talk) 00:18, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yutar did not explicitly request the death penalty, but there is a wide agreement among the people involved in the trial that it was very strongly implicit in the way he argued his case that he found that to be the appropriate sentence - Mandela and his lawyers certainly considered this the case as did the international observers, and the government also made it explicit that they considered it appropriate. Yutar himself in late life claimed that by not explicitly seekng the death penalty he had saved the lives of the accused, and saved South Africa from a blood civil war fueled by the existence of martyrs for the ANC cause.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 00:37, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Maunus.  I am myself very much an outsider to this material.  What you say does, though, seem to confirm that the present article is inaccurate in saying that the death penalty was initially requested.  If you have sources that could be cited as part of a corrected account (e.g., if you feel the article should go into the question of Yutar's thinking at the time of the trial, in addition to his actions) would you care to take a stab at editing the article to get the facts straight? Nandt1 (talk) 03:04, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Having not heard back from you on this, I took it upon myself to redraft the relevant section in line with your account on this page.  I hope, though, that you and others with closer knowledge of the case than mine will feel free to add citations to the article on this point.  Thanks again for your help. Nandt1 (talk) 14:20, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I see now that you had inserted a reference under Charges. What I did just now was to edit the (conflicting) language in the Results section.  I have now pasted in your reference to Frankel there as well.  Nandt1 (talk) 16:02, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Inconsistency over Death Penalty

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Rivonia Trial. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060113175344/http://www.anc.org.za/ancdocs/history/trials/toward_robben_island.html to http://www.anc.org.za/ancdocs/history/trials/toward_robben_island.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:48, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:52, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion