Talk:Log4j

message: :Image:Log4j.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Log4j.jpg

message: The Log4j 1.3 and 2.0 branches should probably be discussed. Some 1.3 alpha versions were released, but development has been abandoned. From http://logging.apache.org/log4j/:
:Apache log4j has three development branches: a stable branch, 1.2, a discontinued branch, 1.3 and an experimental branch 2.0.
:Apache log4j 1.2 releases are widely deployed. Development on the 1.2 branch is generally limited to bug fixing and minor enhancements.
:Apache log4j 1.3 alpha releases are in limited use. Apache log4j 1.3 added many interesting features, but was compatibility with log4j 1.2 was problematic. Many features original developed for log4j 1.3 have been back-ported as companions for log4j 1.2. No further development is anticipated.
:Apache log4j 2.0 is an experimental development branch for logging services designed for Java 5 and later.
-- Ernstdehaan 07:52, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Log4j 1.3 and 2.0 branches 

message: Someone put "outdated" on the log4cxx link again.  I don't think it is outdated.  If there is a reason for putting "outdated" on the log4cxx link, please indicate what it is.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.228.195.206 (talk) 14:27, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I confirm that, according to answer received on log4j users mailing list, log4cxx isn't outdated. --Arnauld (talk) 19:02, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is "outdated" on the Log4cxx link again? 

message: We should remove all direct links to external web site selling softwares and so on...
May be also: add PatternLayout chapter integrating a TTCC subsection
Oliver H (talk) 17:10, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much advertissement links 

message: I just wanted to say how helpful the TTCC section is.  Adding links to it in my log4j.xml config files :) Here's hoping the link doesn't get removed!
--Brilong87 (talk) 16:08, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  TTCC 

message: Log4j  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.65.191.106 (talk) 08:21, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Log4j 

message: It is not very clear to me how to specify where the output file is to be located.  Description of the defaults (if any) would be appreciated too.
Dan Aquinas (talk) 23:31, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specifying Where Output Goes 

message: The log4j Levels should be ordered logically, not like posted. It should say ALL , DEBUG, INFO , WARN , ERROR , FATAL, OFF (in this order)
137.30.122.155 (talk) 23:16, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Why are the levels ordered this way?

message: It is not clear what "NLog" is. Does it refer to JSNLog (probably not)? --Mortense (talk) 21:38, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is "NLog"? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Log4j. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20121225133348/http://log4r.rubyforge.org/ to http://log4r.rubyforge.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: My (non-expertise) search did not find reliable sources that justify a standalone article on Reload4j and seems to make sense as part of the Log4j article. Singularity42 (talk) 17:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: replied on my talk page that Reload4j is a fork of Log4j he created for the purpose of trademark protection and to give the Reload4j its own identify.  Of course, that is not a valid reason for a stand-alone article, and further supports that this should be merged, and the purpose of Wikipedia is not to help products, etc. obtain notability. Singularity42 (talk) 18:11, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please, see the general notability guideline. We assess notability based on coverage in reliable sources. How much a piece of software is used is not really relevant. MarioGom (talk) 13:34, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Reload4j]] into [[Log4j]]