lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:GWR road motor services

message: Greetings  … a couple of clarifications regarding your 6-Sep-2020 revert of my positioning of an image on this page…
To be clear: I mostly did the edit for aesthetic positioning of the image on the page. You'll see the positioning isn't so great after your revert. (Maybe left-side would help?)
:"images go inside the most relevant section, not at bottom of previous"
My change wasn't necessarily between one section and another. I actually moved the image from a sub-section to the containing section. The image is appropriate for the section "Services elsewhere in England," which my edit placed it in.
KKelvinThompson (talk) 19:44, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The section name is "Slough", and the caption is "GWR Omnibus at Burnham Beeches near Slough, circa 1914". The image is directly relevant, see Wikipedia:Image dos and don'ts and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images#Vertical placement. Putting an image before the relevant heading also causes an accessibility issue, as described at MOS:ACCIM item 8. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 10:09, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historic omnibus image
Talk:Francine Rivers

message: I am new to Wikipedia. I wrote a one-paragraph summary/assessment of REDEEMING LOVE (on the Francine Rivers entry), which someone later omitted but with no discussion or comments. I wonder why? Glennhopp 20:40, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm sorry I don't often engage in active use of wikipedia but I think this sentence from this page:
"As is customary with fiction intended for a faith-based readership, the book propounds explicitly and moralistically ideas that a mainstream novelist would probably suggest implicitly."
should either be removed or properly cited.  Thoughts?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.15.13.56 (talk) 04:14, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed? 
Talk:Rudston

message: The name rud comes from the Norse for Red (and become rudd) and is actually pronounced Rookg rather then rudd. The name Rudd (or Red) in the lineage of "Eric the Red" the Viking Warrior that was famed with discovering Iceland. Descendant of Eric the Red, invaded Scotland and England during Viking raids, but some settled and the name spread to Wales and Ireland too, other spread through Europe. It is said that the Rudd descendants to spread from a place called rudston in Yorkshire, where out side of a village of rudston lies a Monolith that is meant to mark the meeting place of the Rudd’s  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.17.5.1 (talk) 12:43, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Apparently there are no less than four cursuses here according to the Wiki article Cursus. If someone knows where they are it would be good to mention them. Aarghdvaark (talk) 04:28, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: PastScape has some detail see CURSUS A, CURSUS B, CURSUS C and CURSUS D. Keith D (talk) 11:03, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks, used these to add a paragraph to the article :) Aarghdvaark (talk) 01:52, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cursuses
Talk:Dear Angel (vinyl)

message: Id like the cover in better quality, but I havent it.....if someone have it, please upload it.
I found the pic of the articule and this
--Maestrotaku 13:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Teck Resources

message: The citations here indicate a non-NPOV article. Lazarusloafer (talk) 19:50, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: with respect, that is irrelevant.  About half the article is negative to Teck, so if there is a POV it's apparently anti-Teck (or anti-mining, anti-business, anti-capitalist or whatever the last editor's beef is).  Companies typically don't get third-party citations for getting on with their business so a well-managed company is unlikely to have any, and the company's website is as good a source as any for basic facts.  This article does not contain the hyperbole associated with a minority of company articles which are apparently written by their PR people.  If you can be specific about what material contains a pro-Teck POV, something can be done.  As it is, I dispute the neutrality of your tag and comment Chrismorey (talk) 00:34, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I concede this was an impulsive tag, not well-considered.  Removing it now. Lazarusloafer (talk) 04:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Article cites company website

message: Cominco needs to be its own article, not just a passing mention in the lede; as the mining and smelting branch of the CPR, it's not just a predecssor company or a Teck acquisition.Skookum1 (talk) 03:38, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Cominco]]

message: The section on selenium contamination is also in the article on Lake Koocanusa.Oceanflynn (talk) 23:33, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Content also in Lake Koocanusa
Talk:Hesselberg

message: Tirkfl 09:15, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: should this be Ridge and furrow? JMiall₰ 12:12, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really, I read the article, and as I understand, it refers to the hills that occur by ploughing. But I followed some links and now I think that "open fields" or "strip cultivation" would fit well. -- Tirkfltalk 07:26, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation issues

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
*If there is not a free use image in the top right corner of the article, please try to find and include one.[?]
*Avoid including galleries in articles, as per Wikipedia:Galleries. Common solutions to this problem include moving the gallery to wikicommons or integrating images with the text.[?]
*When writing standard abbreviations, the abbreviations should not have a 's' to demark plurality (for example, change kms to km and lbs to lb).
*Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with articles ('the', 'a(n)'). For example, if there was a section called ==The Biography==, it should be changed to ==Biography==.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.[?]
*Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[?]
*Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
**Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant -  “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
**Avoid misplaced formality: “in order to/for” (-> to/for), “thereupon”, “notwithstanding”, etc.
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Tirkfl 13:41, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Automated peer review
Talk:Honda CB600F

message: The 2004-2006 Honda CB600F, also called the Hornet in Europe or the 599 in the United States and Canada, is a motorcycle powered by a liquid-cooled, fuel-injected 599cc in-line 4-stroke 4-cylinder DOHC engine that produces just under 100 horsepower (75kW) and weighs 401lb (182kg) dry. The bike has a six-speed transmission. Its suspension consists of a front cartridge fork (inverted in 2006) and a rear single shock with adjustable preload.  Its brakes are dual-disc in the front and single-disc in the rear. The rake is 25°, trail is 98mm, wheelbase is 1419.9mm, and seat height is 790mm.  The engine is based on the unit from the Honda CBR600F3.  It is manufactured in Italy using a small selection of Ducati components.
As a sport-oriented motorcycle that provides an upright riding position and lacks a 
fairing, it is considered a standard or "naked bike". Honda has had a CBR600 model since 1987.
Related is a 919cc fuel injected version called the CB900F (Hornet). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Roguegeek (talk • contribs) 03:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  From Honda 599 

message: 1st reference link goes to a yamaha comment on the Times which is unreachable
80.101.213.19 (talk) 12:15, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Offline references are perfectly acceptable on Wikipedia. --Biker Biker (talk) 12:34, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: True. Although in this case the article is online. I omitted it the first time. --Dbratland (talk) 18:55, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  1st reference link goes to a yamaha comment in the Times which is unreachable 

message: No information about abs? Or combined brakes?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.21.99.180 (talk) 16:23, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abs? Brakes? 

message: Remember: in Brazil is another version of the 250: the 300 (search for it)
You can set it by the list of Hornets  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Repsolh (talk • contribs) 10:50, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The CB300R is not called the Hornet, although some forums have referred to it as a "mini hornet" --Biker Biker (talk) 11:23, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hornet 300 

message: Should the 650F not be a seperate article of it's own? 213.123.251.85 (talk) 07:55, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  CB650F
Talk:Daisy Irani (television personality)

message: There is a current RFC on certain content in Singapore artistes BLP articles that editors watching/editing/passing through this article may be interested in weighing in: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs. This article may be affected due to the inclusion of :Category:Singaporean actors‎ and/or one of its subcategories in the article. RobertskySemi (talk) 23:48, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC on content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs
Talk:Maple Ridge, Tulsa

message: For any copyright issues, please see our talk page. Tulsapreservation 13:43, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Richard Ovenden

message: As an paid employee of the Bodleian Libraries, I have a conflict of interest, but I would like the following facts added to the article:
Ovenden is a trustee of the Chawton House Library"Trustees, Staff and Patrons", chawtonhouse.org Accessed 16 February 2016 and vice-chair of the Kraszna-Krausz Foundation."People" kraszna-krausz.org.uk Accessed 16 February 2016 In 2009, he was elected chair of the Digital Preservation Coalition, replacing Dame Lynne Brindley in a post he held until 2013. "New Year - and New Chair for DPC: Richard Ovenden" Digital Preservation Coalition Accessed 16 February 2016"Richard Ovenden" Balliol College, Oxford. Accessed 16 February 2016 He was elected to the American Philosophical Society in 2015."Richard Ovenden" bodleian.ox.ac.uk Oxford University. Accessed 16 February 2016 He is a Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries of London, having been elected in 2008."Fellows Directory" sal.org.uk Accessed 16 February 2016.
For further reading, note this interview in The Guardian and this book chapter about the Bodleian written by Ovenden.
Thanks in advance for any help, MartinPoulter (talk) 21:05, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 
Template talk:Protected areas of Colorado

message: Of Colorado's six National Monuments, five are managed by the National Park Service and one is managed by the Bureau of Land Management.
Of Colorado's two National Recreation Areas, one is managed by the National Park Service and one is managed by the National Forest Service.
Of Colorado's 41 National Wilderness Areas, 39 are manged by the National Forest Service and two are managed by the National Park Service.  --Buaidh 13:46, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Federal cross agency management

message: State Forest State park is what was formerly known as the Colorado State Forest.  The state forest part of template has been removed. --Footwarrior (talk) 22:40, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: State Forests

message: The  National Natural Landmark is in Larimer County where Sand Creek flows across the border into Wyoming.  Colorado has several creeks called Sand Creek and it's easy to get them confused.
:Thanks for catching this.  Yours aye,  Buaidh  15:31, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sand Creek National Natural Landmark 

message: At the bottom of the Protected areas of Colorado template there is a category Other > Trails and listed are a small selection of the many trails managed on protected lands. A trail may be built, maintain, or closed at the direction of a protected lands manager, typically with consideration of reducing impacts and increasing sustainability, but to me that doesn’t make the trail itself a protected area. Roads and parking lots are also built by land managers after similar considerations, and I wouldn’t consider them protected areas either.
Please note that I agree that federally designated national scenic and historic trails should be included in the template, as they are. Federal legislation establishing these trails can include conservation and preservation dictates or recommendations on protecting sites, trail corridors, and viewsheds. 
I took a look at the protected areas templates for a few other states (AZ, CA, NM, NV, UT, WY) and didn’t find inclusion of local and regional trails.
Should the Other>Trails category be removed or is there an explanation for its existence? I’d appreciate insights. Thanks.--Zapus (talk) 21:58, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: National Recreation Trails are federally designated and locally maintained and protected. Regional Trails are designated and maintained by non-profit organizations (such as the American Discovery Trail Society, the Colorado Trail Foundation, the Adventure Cycling Association, and the Colorado Plateau Mountain Bike Trail Association), and are locally protected, often with the assistance of the National Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management. So I think we should include these trails as protected areas. Yours aye,  Buaidh  talk e-mail 16:12, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Local and regional trails are protected areas?
Talk:Public Schools Act 1868

message: :although now disliked by the original nine schools and their representative associations
Please could we have some evidence for the suggestion that the original nine public schools and their representative associations dislike being called public schools.--Oxonian2006 13:52, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Term "public school" disliked?

message: Eton certainly isn't in London, and I'm not sure if Harrow was in 1868 either. Westminster and St. Paul's certainly are, as are the 1868 sites of Charterhouse and Merchant Taylors'.
Lexiconius (talk) 00:48, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Six in London? Really?

message: Whilst the Clarendon Commission did investigate the nine public schools mentioned in this article, the Public Schools Act of 1868 only concerned itself with seven of the schools. St Paul's and Merchant Taylors' had successfully argued, during the commission, that they were in fact private schools; this and the fact that they were day schools, excluded them from the definition of a public school and therefore they were not included in the act of parliament. 
A copy of the act can be accessed here: Public Schools Act  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.98.129.169 (talk) 01:05, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nine Public Schools?

message: An editor, working from different IP addresses, has repeatedly added Brighton College to the list of schools that were investigated by the Clarendon Commission, and dealt with by the 1868 act – in this article, in the Clarendon Commission article, and in the Public school (United Kingdom) article. I have been sceptical about this claim, but in view of this edit, with its justification that "Brighton College was excluded from this list. When inspecting 'A practical handbook to the principal schools of England (Charles Eyre Pascoe, 1877), it appears they were added at one of the final stages. Checked with Brighton College archives too.", I have assumed that there might have been some element of fact behind it, and that the edits were made in good faith. I have now come to the conclusion that they are simply vandalism. There is certainly no mention of Brighton College in the text of the 1868 act (a link to which the IP has deleted in their last edit). They have several times cited Pascoe's 1877 book, and linked to it on Google Books: as it hasn't been digitised, that's not particularly helpful, but I have now checked a physical copy, and it contains no mention whatsoever of Brighton College (or, indeed, any discussion of the Clarendon Commission or the 1868 Act). I have also looked at a copy of Colin Shrosbree's 1988 book on the Clarendon Commission, and that contains no mention of Brighton College either, though it does make the point that the original parliamentary proposal was for a Royal Commission to investigate all endowed schools, but that for practical reasons that was cut down to nine. I am therefore reverting both this and the Clarendon Commission articles to the last clean versions. GrindtXX (talk) 14:49, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brighton College
Talk:Owen's Defence

message: John Owen an English vicar would of certainly known it was a defence. SunCreator (talk) 01:46, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I fully agree.  Fischer Defence would look equally odd.  See Talk:English Defense for a couple of failed attempts to fix a similar problem. Quale (talk) 14:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that Owen was a Brit, I also agree. Krakatoa (talk) 00:11, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name: Owen's Defence 

message: If Owen's Defence is to be defined as 1. e4 b6, then what name is given to 1. d4 b6 and 1. e4 e6 2. d4 b6? These are usually regarded as being "the same" defence since they almost always transpose to the same position. 2.25.130.227 (talk) 18:25, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomenclature
Talk:Poisoned Pawn Variation

message: 'Poisoned Pawn' is a concept so it can occur in many games, not just openings, here is a game example.
The following are the occurances in opening theory. List is likely incomplete. 
*1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.f4 Qb6 Najdorf Sicilian
*1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 Ne7 7.Qg4 French, Winawer
*1.d4 Nf6 2.Bg5 c5 3.d5 Qb6 4.Nc3 Tromposky.
*1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5 3.Bc4 fxe4 4.Nxe5 Qg5 5.d4 Qxg2 Latvian
*1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Bf4 c5 4.e3 Qb6 5.Nc3 Queen's Pawn ChessCreator (talk) 22:48, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variations 

message: Could there be, perhaps, a more specific explanation of what a poisoned pawn actually is within the first few lines of this article? This article does a very good job of explaining where it occurs and notable games in which it has appeared but isn't it more than just a variation? why is it called a 'poisoned pawn' what's poisoned about the pawn? I think it would benefit the layman (me) to understand these things. --Kurushi (talk) 18:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Perhaps this link would assist if added to the text. Poisoned Pawn. SunCreator (talk) 19:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Perfect! Thanks SunCreator. --Kurushi (talk) 19:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition? 

message: Wouldn't a more suitable title for this article be Poisoned Pawn. Yes, 'Poisoned Pawn' is a variation but 'variation' is not it's name. SunCreator (talk) 02:46, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  Bubba73 (the argument clinic), 05:25, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree.  "Poisoned Pawn Variation" is its name, or rather the name of more than one opening.  "Poisoned pawn" is the b-pawn, although it is sometimes used informally as the name of the variation, just as "the Scotch" is used informally for the Scotch Game, or "the English" is used informally for the English Opening, etc.  Quale (talk) 05:01, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think it would be better for the article to discuss the "poisoned pawn" and then show how the P.P.V. comes up in openings such as the Sicilian and French.  See Glossary of chess#Poisoned Pawn. Bubba73 (the argument clinic), 05:11, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: What about this?
* 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 c5 4. Nf3 Nc6 5. c3 Qb6 6. Bd3 cxd4 7. cxd4
Here for black, ...7. Nxd4 loses a queen after 8. Nxd4 Qxd4 9. Bb5+ and 10. Qxd4 BleuDXXXIV (talk) 11:52, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another French Defence
Talk:Sicilian Defence, Accelerated Dragon

message: Is the following naming correct?
:1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 g6 - Hyperaccelerated Dragon or Hungarian Variation
:1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 g6 - Accelerated Fianchetto or Accelerated Dragon
:1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 g6 - Dragon SunCreator (talk) 21:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No. (Apologies: I overlooked that you have 2... Nc6 in the third line. As the user below states, it should be 2... d6.) 91.105.1.194 (talk) 22:50, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming

message: I think this article should be merged with Sicilian Defence, Dragon Variation. This article is somewhat short. Mast303 (talk) 02:55, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge