Talk:Audrey Raines

message: Victim of a kidnapping by Cheng Zhi prior to the events of Day 6, Audrey is set to return on the April 9th episode of the show, on FOX (10pm - 11pm).
What is the source on this? The way this sentence is written, it sounds as if Audrey has been captured by the Chinese, too? There has been no evidence of this. Is this just a case of poor syntax? RPM 03:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading? Needs a source 

message: I doubt its reliability! Is it used elsewhere. And besides it is just speculation, not official. Please post otherwise. Superbowlbound 22:16, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: BuddyTV is a reliable source. This is not speculation at all - scripts were leaked, and the people working for BuddyTV (a website that specializes in spoilers for many programs) know about what happens later on in the series. The burden is on you to demonstrate that BuddyTV is unreliable if you don't agree. --DLandTALK 17:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I had just posted almost the same thing. I used the Halo 3 page as an example. The only reliable sources are ones run by bungie and microsoft. It will look pretty bad if we are wrong, and look bad if we are right but using random sources. Superbowlbound 03:09, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Ok, I am going to delete the pre-release spoilers for now. Yaksar 21:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, I believe the website. I just don't think we should post it. It seems it will be right so far too. Superbowlbound 13:26, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Please make that readable? I really didn't understand. Superbowlbound 01:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok then. According to Wikipedia policy (here), it is unacceptable to delete information that is "relevant, neutral, and attributable" just because it is a spoiler. The paragraph in question fulfills all three of these criteria, so it should not be deleted, according to Wikipedia policy. --DLandTALK 01:52, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll take your silence as affirmation. --DLandTALK 04:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I take it you don't live in America? You posted at 1:50 in the morning. That is why I didn't respond. But by saying what you said, I think I'll make my own website with fake spoilers.Superbowlbound 12:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Note that the "leaked scripts" were early in the process of production as it is quite common that details often get changed to reflect continuity (such as a "successor" to a scene that was deleted in a previous episode at last minute) or availability of the actor(s) involved (Kim Raver's availability was a question mark once The Nine became a regularly scheduled series... and was put in hiatus a few weeks later. There have been similar scheduling and cast changes in the last several weeks, including the addition of a character that was not originally in the season outline... and the availability of the actor to play him in a four-episode arc). So confirmation would still be needed to take this out of the "speculation" category. 147.70.242.40 01:35, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While that may be true, as long as it is attributed to a source, there is no reason not to mention it. --DLandTALK 02:10, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A reliable source (as defined by Wikipedia policy/guidelines - there has been a battle over this for quite some time now), perhaps, if the same source makes it very clear that it was a preliminary (not necessarily a shooting) script and that fact is indicated in the Wikipedia article as well. What happens/happened after the release of the script would still fall in the "speculation" department without further documentation. And the last time I checked, fan blogs and fansites still are not considered "reliable sources" for much of the speculation that has been posted for "future" episodes. 147.70.242.40 17:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: Her DNA was tested...it's Audrey.  Besides, making speculation about a character has no place in an encyclopedia.  I am going to change Presumed Deceased to Deceased. - BlackWidower 21:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Although there is no actual proof they tested the DNA, you can't speculate. Agree Superbowlbound 23:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

text: No body...Superbowlbound 02:20, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

text: You misunderstand me. There shouldn't be speculation. I was saying that taking picture of a dead body proves nothing. They don't have the body. She may still alive. But we shouldn't put that. Superbowlbound 00:45, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculation 

message: DLand, most have already agreed that the information you keep adding has no place in wikipedia. Please stop adding it. 
Yaksar 16:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaked info 

message: Could someone who was paying closer attention than I was to tonight's episode (4/30) confirm what I heard?  I thought I heard Jack say that Audrey was born in Albany, NY.  Maybe he meant raised there, but in any case the article says she was born in Rhode Island.  Just wondering if that needs to be corrected. --Roehl Sybing 02:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  place of birth? 

message: Looks like the writers slipped up.  In Day 4, Heller makes references to his late wife, "Susan".  Yet when Jack had Audrey in the basement of CTU in last night's episode (4/30/2007) he said her mother's name was Elise or Eloise or something like that.  Does somebody have it DVR-ed so they can put Audrey's mother's correct name in? I've already deleted the episode off of my DVR.  Zkissane 15:10, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audrey's Mother 

message: Keep this article as it is.  Audrey was a major character in Seasons 4 and 5, a driving plot for the second half of Seasons 6, and is expected to be in the upcoming 24 movie.  This merging madness has run amok. --MiB-24 (talk) 06:59, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging