lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:C.C. DeVille

message: "Interesting facts: CC is not a member of a political party" Why is this significant?
Have placed reference to 'Cherry Pie' in body of article, as it is not a sufficiently important aspect of DeVille's career to go in the opening paragraph. sph 5 July 05.
"His interest in music grew after having seen The Beatles perform on the Ed Sullivan Show (he was 2 years old at the time). "
Are we supposed to believe this is true? 203.206.36.254 14:58, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I can't remember who did C.C. refer to when he said he had a very famous violinist as his violin teacher when he was a kid... I don't remember if it was Jascha Heifetz or Itzhak Perlman... who was the teacher? Demf 07:24, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Who was his violin teacher?

message: Well we're not living in the past are we? OK, back in 1984, this guys-dressed-as-girls look was en vogue, but now? Couldn't we place a more recent photo of CC here than him looking like an effing woman??! -steamhammer 80.129.121.229 13:23, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Horrible photo

message: Black page, no sign of life. Looks like this will not be relaunched until he's out of jail...-steamhammer 80.129.121.229 13:28, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Planet de Ville .COM apparently offline
Talk:Paul Morand

message: I have the "New-York" book somewhere, and never guessed the author was a racist based on what I've read of it; a lot of it seems to be fairly straight travelogue... AnonMoos (talk) 01:16, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: New-York

message: The bibliography section of this page seems to be a focus on only the French titles, though there are one or two English titles thrown in. But, to date, many of Morand's French publications are available in English, and titles are often different. A lot of the English titles for Morand's books can be found here. The bibliography section could either be broken into two subsections for each language (the EN list may not be as full), or just a focus on the English titles alone since this is the English version of the Paul Morand page. French titles would then be supported in the French page, logically. --Rootwarden (talk) 07:52, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Bibliography: English vs. French titles of books

message: If anyone happens to own the book, 1900 (French version), I'd be grateful if you would get in touch. I'm hoping to get a photocopy of page 94. Thanks in advance. --Rootwarden (talk) 13:51, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Book: 1900
Talk:Southern red bat

message: I'm not sure if this is covered in the Manual of Style, but the article reads like it was written for a grade school audience. I'm not bold enough to make the changes necessary to bring this more in line with the quality of other Wikipedia articles, but perhaps someone more experienced might give it a go. TennysonXII (talk) 06:49, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could use some copy-editing love
Talk:Richard Mansfield

message: The Globe Theatre mentioned in this article is not the one where Shakespeare's King's Men performed the plays of the Bard (that Globe burned down in the 17th Century!). I removed the link from the text of this entry, as it's totally misleading.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.140.21.227 (talk) 15:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Globe Theatre?

message: An editor has altered the stated d.o.b. from 1857 to 1854. The Manchester Guardian, ("Memorial Notices", 31 August 1907, p. 8) says that Mansfield died age 50. The Times (31 August 1907, p. 3) also says he was 50. If these two authoritative sources agree that 1857 is the year, I see no prima facie reason to contest the point. It is no doubt possible that Mansfield knocked a few years off his real age – but I think we'd need some evidence in support of such an assertion, pending which I suggest we revert to 1857. Views, please? - Tim riley (talk) 18:16, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  All of his bios listed in the links and references section agree on 1857.  See this, for example.  I have reverted the change.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:59, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 

message: An editor added this about Mansfield's father:  "Maurice Mansfield's original family name was Mansfeld, having left behind a wife and five children in Hungary to live with Madame Rudersdorff."  Can anyone confirm this?  See WP:Reliable sources.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 07:10, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Father

message: I came across Richard Mansfield's name while listening to an old time radio program, "That Was the Year" and he was mentioned in 1904 as performing in "Ivan the Terrible".  According to IBDBb(Internet Broadway Database, similar to IMDb), Mansfield's name is given as Meridan Phelps.  Does anyone know anything about this?  There was also the Richard Mansfield Repertory Company and his wife was listed as Mrs. Richard Mansfield.Jtyroler (talk) 03:37, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  Meridan Phelps was only a pseudonym that he used sometimes.  I added a clarification to the article.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:49, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Names
Talk:The Singles 86–98

message: There's no question: This album can't be described as just "synthpop". Look at the SOFAD and Ultra material: There's almost no "synth pop" there at all BY DEFINITION. And even the other stuff is too different from most other synth pop material, so more genres should be listed. Alternative Dance and New Wave or Dark Wave AT LEAST should be there.
Besides, MANY albums/singles have 2-4 genres listed (or if not, should have them listed), not 1.
Though those 2-3 genres should be added, please keep the article protected so those other retards won't edit them out. Angry Shoplifter (talk) 04:38, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the second time I've seen you be abusive to other editors. Please stop of you will be reported to admins. --JD554 (talk) 08:03, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTF is this genre war for 
Category talk:Smartphones

message: Should this be in :Category:Personal digital assistants, or are there some non-PDA smartphones? -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 08:34, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorization

message: I think that the definition that the phone has Personal Information Management capabilities is insufficient. Nearly every Nokia S40 phone could be considered a smartphone by that definition. I would argue that the main defining characteristic of a smartphone is the question whether the mobile operating system supports installing applications beyond Java and BREW applications. Andries (talk) 16:41, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition
Talk:Export–Import Bank of the United States

message: The Export-Import Bank has the longest vacancy for its IG position, totaling 2,111 days, or almost six years. Trump sent a nominee to the Senate in October 2019 for that position.https://www.federaltimes.com/management/leadership/2020/04/06/nominations-for-longstanding-inspector-general-vacancies-arrive-at-senate
X1\ (talk) 07:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  EXIM Inspector General ([[Office of Inspector General (United States)|EIB-OIG]]), in article?
Talk:Point group

message: Is there a difference between Rotoreflection and Improper rotation, in the opening of the article?
(And since this is about higher dimensional geometry, shouldn't this be removed?--GuenterRote (talk) 17:05, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there is a difference. I simplified the sentence and linked improper rotation, unless someone else can clarify it. From Coxeter's reflection POV, a rotation is the product of two reflections, and an rotoreflection or improper rotation is the product of 3 reflections, so this applies to any dimensional geometry 3 or higher. Tom Ruen (talk) 00:41, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rotoreflection? 

message: This is mentioned twice near the beginning of the article as a modifier to "point group", but is never defined.  I think this should be done so, or removed. Sounds like from the previous discussion it is important; I take it excludes groups like C∞, yes?  Baccyak4H 19:15, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "discrete" 

message: Tom, I don't get it: the table seems to say that changing the colors of the dots changes the group order. —Tamfang (talk) 05:10, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for the slow reply(!) There's color and node indices. So if two nodes have the same index (or color), that means there's a symmetry operation that maps one onto the other, and doubles the symmetry (or factorial order increase if multiples). So like in Coxeter notation o o o o --> [2,2,2] has order 16, and [4,3,3] has order 384, 24 times higher. But with 4 same-"colored/indexed? nodes, this is represented as [3,3[2,2,2]]=[4,3,3], where the order [3,3] symmetry family exists in all permutations of 4 nodes. And the simpler case of doubling, like [ [3,3] ]=[1[3,3]]=[4,3], with [1] as a bilateral symmetry within [3,3] that raises it to [4,3]. Tom Ruen (talk) 20:45, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  duoprism groups 

message: The E6 Coxeter diagram has mirror symmetry, so there exists an E6×2 group , which is not included in the page.
The 1_22 polytope has this symmetry, for example. --Goomba1729 (talk) 21:57, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  E6×2 

message: What's "Conway" notation, which has its own table column name in Point group#Three_dimensions? It links to Conway the guy, not the notation. It doesn't appear related to Conway notation (knot theory). Orbifold notation already has its own column. This entire table was added here in 2011 by . Please add a reference or link for this notation if it is current; otherwise I'd like to remove the column. –MadeOfAtoms (talk) 03:45, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Conway" notation?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Community/General/WikiPraxis

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Community/Strategy#The_WikiPraxis_specification says that this is supposed to be a column in the Wikipedia:Signpost.  If this is the case, this should be explained on this project page.  Right now, there's just some pretty but nonsensical stuff about engines and motion and Wikipedia community.
The "MERGE" line is also quite disturbing - I hope no one is planning on merging these very distict pages.  Perhaps this is just a weird way of saying what projects this "beat" is supposed to cover?
But it's my understanding that Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom is the coordination point for that sort of thing.  Also, no one seems to be actually writing this column.  So is this page really needed?  Can it be deleted? -- Beland 21:10, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Anything on Wikipedia can be deleted. I was just attempting to put some energy, fun and enthusiasm into the WikiProjects.Sorry if it don't fit into your way of thinking. I'll have someone delete the darn thing if it's a problem. Sheesh. Quinobi 22:59, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: What is this page for?

message: Note that Praxis is a disambiguation page.  Perhaps the desired link is Praxis (word)? -- Beland 21:11, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead and delete it. I've merged everything into the main project space and/or moved it out altogether. Quinobi 21:04, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Praxis
Talk:David Gilmour

message: This group needs to be added to associated acts.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.216.245.136 (talk) 18:08, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Dream Academy 

message: I think David Gilmour deserves better than this "Gilmour performing live in Brussels". Please replace this with a photo in which he can actually be recognized. This photo is tiny and not really in focus and it is not clear who is who. Hskoppek (talk) 11:15, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  obscure photo
Talk:Jamaat ul-Fuqra

message: According to profile of al-Fuqra by the National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism (MIPT), the group was falsely believed to have been founded by Pakistani cleric Sheikh Mubarak Ali Gilani Hashemi in 1980.
"Falsely believes"?  What's correct then?  Needs sourcing and cleanup.  /Blaxthos 16:49, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory statements 

message: I completely acknowledge the potential controversy that might be involved in dealing with topics like these, but applying a NPOV violation template without providing the specific details of *what* you find to be non-neutral about the article is less than helpful. Other editors require that input in order to work with you to get the neutral "fact" based article that I'm sure both of us desire. I have no objection whatsoever to the template being re-applied, provided that you name specific issues so that they can be addressed in a way keeping with established policy here on Wikipedia.
Deconstructhis 23:50, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re Alleged Non-Neutrality of Article 

message: Jamaat ul-Fuqra (alternatively Jamaat al-Fuqra) (Arabic: جماعة الفقراء, "Community of the Impoverished") is an organization
Should be changed to
Jamaat ul-Fuqra (alternatively Jamaat al-Fuqra) (Arabic: جماعة الفقراء, "Community of the Impoverished") is a terrorist organization
This is a proven terrorist organization whose activities are listed even in this article and should be identified as such from the beginning.  Barring any disagreements, I will make this change in approx. one-two weeks. ProtektYaNutz (talk) 17:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of beginning 

message: Reference 13 does not point to the named article. It points to the main page for the Colorado Attorney General's Office.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Strippy6 (talk • contribs) 01:53, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misdirected reference lnk 

message: It looks like there are two different Muslims of America organizations and one, a far more peaceful body, wrongly redirects here. I am not sure how to rectify this.  Philmv (talk) 21:20, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong redirect?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Red Link Recovery/Repeated letters/1

message: Are people removing these things once they've been fixed?--Mitsukai 5 July 2005 00:16 (UTC)
:Mostly, yes. I do come across some that are already completed, but I assume these are due to random cleanup edits not associated with this WikiProject. - BierHerr | Bier holen gehen 15:35, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airlines

message: We need to do a new RFC for Airline destinations tables as the old one was from 2018. So we can find what the current Wikipedia community views are on them being included. CHCBOY (talk) 18:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I was thinking that we should wait a few months before doing the new RFC, just because we've had a lot of discussions on the topic recently. We can plan the RFC here and make sure it's worded properly. Sunnya343 (talk) 13:43, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Please, no. We just did this about six months ago and it was messy like it always is. I'm not sure why we need to keep having this RfC every year to always get the same result....   ✈ mike_gigs talkcontribs 13:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually that was for Airport specific tables not for the individual airline destinations tables. CHCBOY (talk) 18:35, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: AH, I see. I mixed up what you meant - my apologies. Ironically, I do support an RfC on this subject. I think it would be smart to plan a well worded RfC, but we may not want to wait too long as a lot of "List of XX Airline Destinations" articles have been showing up at AfD and may need to be recreated depending on the RfC results.   ✈ mike_gigs talkcontribs 19:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed very true. Are you any good at starting one? CHCBOY (talk) 05:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems like people including me realized at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2024 April 3 that having more AFDs is a time sink, so I don't think there will be more. I started the last two AFDs and won't be doing any more for that reason.This is arbitrary but how about doing the RFC in July (3 months after the last AFD)? Though we could start planning it whenever. Sunnya343 (talk) 13:56, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems ok to start in July. It's only 6 weeks away from now. CHCBOY (talk) 00:02, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

text: How would a new RFC be useful to improve the Airline destinations lists? Axisstroke (talk) 11:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It will help finding a consensus by users on Wikipedia of what can be included in the list. CHCBOY (talk) 19:31, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New RFC for Airline destinations tables 

message: A couple months ago, WestJet Encore, a featured article, was tagged with several "Primary sources" orange banners. Is anyone willing to address these concerns on the article's talk page? If not, this may be sent to WP:FAR. Z1720 (talk) 01:20, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary source concern at [[WestJet Encore]] 

message: Hello, somebody please provide me a link to sign up to WikiProject Airlines. I am a member of the Aviation WikiProject, but I can't join WikiProject Airlines. BuddyHeigh (talk) 20:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you mean the Wikipedia:WikiProject Airlines/Participants page? CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 14:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Join WikiProject
Talk:King David Hotel

message: My mother visited Israel with her family in the early 1960s (certainly before the 1967 war--the Old City was under Jordanian control at the time), and she says that she stayed at the King David then.  This would indicate that the article's implication that the hotel was closed between 1948 and 1967 is incorrect, but we should probably get more information on the hotel's status then.
It's currently owned by the Dan Hotel chain, and this too should get a mention.  Beinsane 00:40, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates of opening 

message: it the bombing in oklahoma city by McVay is listed as an act of terrorism, why isnt this one? is there one standard for american terrorists and another for Jewish terrorists like Begin?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.45.61.254 (talk) 03:36, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  an act of terrorism 

message: Who is exactly the queen dowager of persia mentioned in the article-neitherno date given  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zanganeh (talk • contribs) 12:28, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnamed person
Talk:Wartburg Festival

message: Although "Bundesakte" is now standard orthography, I think the original spelling should be retained in titles (as listed  here for example.) Sparafucil (talk) 21:01, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling book titles

message: 'After the German War of Liberation against France and Napoleon, many people were bitter about dreams of German unity shattered after the Congress of Vienna. Democratic reforms were stalled, and governments had cracked down on press freedom and rights of association.'
The sentiment of this statement is broadly true, but perhaps something of a debate needs to be opened up/acknowledged here. Whilst democratic reforms had, of course, been enabled in Bavaria, Wurttemberg, Baden and Hesse-Darmstadt, these were the only four states to create elected assemblies with constitutions. Similar movements existed in Germany but almost certainly not Prussia or Austrian lands. The point of 'many people were bitter' needs to be qualified/expanded on in my opinion. That's my opinion, of course.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.249.56.149 (talk) 16:38, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical accuracy
Talk:High Times

message: I heard that in a recent issue of High Times there was an insert containing the leaf of a male marijuana plant. Is this true? If this is true how can they legally do it? 67.165.189.233 16:45, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The leaf of a male marijuana plant is the rough equivalent of catnip, and its THC level is often below legal limits.--Cberlet 02:09, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, for purists, there is no THC in catnip, and studies show that you have to smoke a whole lot of catnip to get a buzz, which is the point...the leaf of a male marijuana plant has relatively little psychoactive content compared to the resin that collects on the surface of the female leaf.--Cberlet 02:15, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What issue is this male leaf supposed to have been inserted?  Not aware of it.  Is this an Internet legend?--Cberlet 02:26, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaf Insert 

message: Would you like to make an input into Greg Green. A HT contributor says that HT cites Green. If you have anything to offer, please do. (Backlit 07:55, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Greg Green]] 
Talk:Medical residency

message: Combine with "Residency" page?
Disagree.  In the practice of medicine requiring an MD or DO there are subfields such as dermatology, various kinds of surgery, general internal medicine and its subfields (such as endocrinology, gastroenterology, etc.) refered to collectively, in law and commonly, as "medicine". Thus "medical residency" can include pediatrics, psychiatry, neurology, surgery, pathology, etc. as well as the subfields of internal medicine.  Matching plans deal with nearly all of the these residencies (and a few non-medical training programs, e.g. clinical psychology).  The question should be, move  "Residency" into "Medical Residency" ?
Agree. The subject matter is the same. Dryman 05:51, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to agree that Residency (medicine) is probably the better title. The article needs to be more comprehensive as well. — Knowledge Seeker দ 05:22, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
Agree I like the residency(medicine) better. That way all the concerns about the term Medical Residency can be folded into a nice catch-all term InvictaHOG 00:31, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Tōnalpōhualli

message: This is a start, but could use work from someone who knows the Aztecs better Salsb 5 July 2005 01:24 (UTC)
Hey, what's the reason for recating ? Salsb 02:23, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: A start

message: for discussion on the merge proposal, see talk:Aztec calendar.--cjllw | TALK 01:52, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal (Nov 06)
Talk:Federal Center SW station

message: Does this station have 2 platforms or 4?
Tabletop 5 July 2005 01:35 (UTC)
:Federal Center SW has one single island platform.  Schuminweb 23:09, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Theban Cycle

message: The edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Theban_Cycle&oldid=994955209
I don't have time to go through it all and fix the various errors that still remain. Some look so weird as to resemble vandalism, such as Ethereum for Eteocles.
Cerberus™ (talk) 01:27, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Many errors introduced in large addition made by Artemisbbb on 18 December 2020‎
Talk:Virgin of Paris

message: There is no specific "Virgin of Paris". --Wetman 5 July 2005 02:01 (UTC)
:You said it, brother. Randy Kryn 23:45, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: — Assignment last updated by Kmdavis7 (talk) 18:04, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Information Literacy and Scholarly Discourse
Talk:Sasaram

message: * Those who are interested in developing this page are requested to follow the norms laid down in Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Cities. Please provide a proper reference or source of whatever you add to this page, in order that others can verify the facts from that reference. -- P.K.Niyogi 07:22, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Guideline

message: Is the location correct? If no, then please give the correct location!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.46.245.108 (talk) 20:51, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sasaram HVDC back-to-back station