lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Colobinae

message: I don't understand why leaf monkey and langur redirect here when these words are not bold on the page, but actually seem to be a subset in their own group.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.177.113.91 (talk) 22:10, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirects

message: As can be seen from my See Also addition, Langur in English should not redirect here but to a disambiguation page for the ambiguous layman's term.  As genome studies proceed in Botany and in Zoology, this will be a more frequent need given the clades now emerging from the science and resulting in revised taxonomies. Layman's language or common language will lag behind for decades or longer.  But in the case of my adding the See Also section, the 'langur' in question is critically endangered.  Minimally, we must add "For endangered langur in China, see white-headed langur.
The Lutung page states: "Most of the species in this genus can be referred to as lutungs, as langurs, or as leaf monkeys" but the opening of this article mentions only Leaf variant in Boldface.
G. Robert Shiplett 14:07, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Langur can refer to all of the species in the langur subgroup of this subfamily. Since we don't have articles about the subgroups, it redirects here. Some genera have other names as well (such as lutung) while other names can also apply to all of the species (I believe leaf monkey fits that bill). - UtherSRG (talk) 16:55, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation page required 

message: In the sentence "one of langurs and the other of the "odd-nosed" species" the plural 'langurs' is a link to this very page - a symptom of what is wrong here given the lack of a langur disambiguation page.
G. Robert Shiplett 14:19, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  self-referential link
Talk:William Estabrook Chancellor

message: Is this newsworthy enough, especially when there is so much speculation about "the first Black American to achieve the highest office in the land" - Colin Powell or Condoleezza Rice?  It occurs to me, that Black aspirations, and African American pride can only be abashed at such a record - be he of African American lineage or not!  But was Chancellor right to have published - right with his facts I mean?  Or did the roorbacks exhibit a mean-spirited, nasty, brutal streak of racism?  I suspect Harding supporters would have folks say that about Chancellor ... whilst those that see his marriage into Beecher Stowe's family a confirmation, and celebration, of African American values?  Whatever it is - Chancellor's story remains largely unheard - although echoes seemed to surface in Philip Roth's "The Human Stain" - where a professor is again 'hounded from office' under the cloud of suspicion of racism;  Roth's professor, it turns out - also owns unspoken lineage ... but this time, it is the professor who has been accused of anti-Black attitudes.  John A. Murphy writes of Chancellor's experiences under Harding's dogged pursuit in his publication of 2000 - "The Indictment".  That so little of Harding's memory is remembered today may well be testimony to the gargantuan failure of his Presidency (corruption and poor policies);  so little of Chancellor's a testimony to the ruthlessness that Harding utilised in effacing his name from history.  And if we let Harding get away with it, that is as much indictment as any ... —80.40.0.111 17:47, 25 November 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Y'know, that sort of thing is not normally taken as a sufficient end to a biography. It would seem that Chancellor spent about 40 years in Canada.  The LoC doesn't have any listings for further publications, nor did I find any in the LAC, so apparently the Canadians wouldn't publish his stuff either.  What was he doing?  Lumberjacking?  Singing “Beautiful Ohio” for pennies on street corners? —12.72.71.48 13:25, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: “Chancellor moved to Canada.”

message: The article states, in different places, that Chancellor lost his job at Wooster in 1920, and in 1921. The former is probably more likely.--Wehwalt (talk) 15:01, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepency
Talk:Eddie Bracken

message: Eddie Bracken was not in Our Gang, but in a competing series called The Kiddie Troupers. --b. Touch 18:10, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Where did that come from? It's not mentioned in the article and, unless there is a reason for it, it should be removed.Ed (talk) 14:53, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: LGBT category
Talk:Stout

message: I feel as though there is too many references to Guinness on this page. Certainly, there's other stouts that could share reference, no?
NigeriaNoKamisama (talk) 04:34, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too Much Guinness 
Talk:MacDonald White Paper

message: The original author (24.177.171.251) wrote this on the page MacDonald White Paper/Temp:
: I saw no copyright notices on the source document located at
: http://www.wzo.org.il/home/politic/white39.htm
: I belived it to be very interesting and worthy of publishing in the context of history.
: If I violated copyright law, I am sorry and the copyrighter should publicly state the compensation required to reproduce the document.
: Thank you
All works are copyright of their authors; no copyright notice is required.  You need permission to use the work in original or even modified form.  I'm undertaking a stub rewrite from multiple sources since I agree that this was a very important historical document. --Minority Report (entropy rim riot) 18:44, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject South Africa/Collaboration

message: I suggest that the Afrikaans edition be considered also - and someone think about watching both and carrying things back and forth. I have lifted lots about africa from the German and French wikipedias - definitely helped by automated translators that only need minor fixup. How about nominating good Afrikaans articles that need moving to the English edition ? Might save a lot of work. Wizzy 18:44, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)
I think that's a good idea, I just have terrible Afrikaans so if you want to translate the main site describing the Collaboration, I (or you) can post it on the Afrikaans wikipedia. PZFUN 20:43, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: The first nominations was only given half a week (24 Nov to 28 Nov 2004). I propose to extend the deadline to 4 December 2004 and try get more South Africans Wikipedians to vote.--Jcw69 15:38, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extension 

message: I vote that we remove this listing.  It is not South Africa specific, and would do much better on the science COTW.  Any opinions? PZFUN 20:59, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree--Jcw69 18:05, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big Five
Category talk:School types

message: The following discussion comes from Wikipedia:Categories for deletion. The consensus was to keep both categories, but the contents of each may need to be examined. Renaming one or both categories has been suggested. (If this is to be done, the category to be renamed ought to be listed separately at Categories for deletion.) -Aranel ("Sarah") 19:01, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: CfD discussion

message: If there is a difference between these two categories, I can't fathom it.  I think they should probably be merged, maybe under a third title.  If you support keeping them both, it might not be a bad idea to articulate definitions that can be posted in the intros for future reference. -- Beland 07:24, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Academic institutions]] vs. [[:Category:School types]] 

message: Distance education needs to be listed under D, not C. 
69.138.229.246 23:59, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alphabetic list of articles 

message: American english usage of the term "school" differs from that in England and Australia. The term in the US can reference tertiary educational institutions. This is not the generally the case in England and Australia. The :Category:Schools is for individual schools generally at primary education and secondary education levels. Until this is clarified this category should also go under :Category:Education. -- Paul foord 00:29, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: American usage of the term school not same as England/Australia
Talk:Rolls-Royce Holdings

message: There are some engines listed in the products section that ceased production in the 1960s and 70s, they should be covered briefly in the Rolls-Royce Limited article. The hatnote in this article states the scope is 1987 on, the two engine navboxes split at 1971 (nationalisation of the company). Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 17:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope

message: The lead says:
Assuming the "commercial" isn't significant and maker=manufacturer, which is it, second or fourth? The Statista source is paywalled. :(
 —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 05:29, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rank
Talk:Ivanovo State University of Chemistry and Technology

message: this is really paranoya! I have added few lines from my university's webpage like name and system deleted it as copyright violation. Should I use '0' like in pr0n to make system believe the difference ?
:Actually, the system didn't delete it—I'm the one who flagged it as a potential copyright violation. Also, it is not deleted; the original version is still preserved in the history. If you can show that it does not violate copyright as described at Wikipedia:Copyrights, or if it is otherwise judged not to be a copyright violation, it will be restored. But no, you should not just misspell words so that no one notices that you have copied text from external web sites. Rather, although you may use external web sites as research for your articles, you should use that information to write original content. I know this may be  a little confusing; please ask me if you have any questions. — Knowledge Seeker দ (talk) 04:47, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Manzanita

message: Part of Cal Poly Pomona's California Flora Project
Biologycpp 21:27, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Today is the first time I've ever heard anyone apply the name 'manzanita' to Arctostaphylos uva-ursi. Try talking about 'manzanita' to a botanist working in e.g. the Scottish Highlands, and you'll get blank looks, mention 'bearberry', and he'll know exactly what's meant. I suspect the same would apply in Canada and the eastern US. - MPF 23:14, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirecting to Manzanita

message: why is the bark on a manzanita plant so unusual--a mix between dead wood and shiny maroon covering?
thanks69.167.57.22 09:15, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Many species of tree will be partially dead throughout their lifetimes. Some of the oldest trees in existence (several thousand years old) are mostly dead snags. Some of the biggest trees in existence (like sequoia) are mostly dead wood (the heart of the tree dies after a few hundred years, so that it no longer needs nutrients, yet remains firm (which is why heart wood of giant trees is excellent building material, it takes a long time to rot)). Manzanita happens to have a very high contrast between the live bark and dead flesh, as well as having the dead sections mostly as external branches and sections. Also, it only takes a few years for the dead bark to change color. -- As for why the bark is maroon, good question. It also sheds very oddly. Splarka (rant) 13:08, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  manzanita bark 

message: There is a redirect to this page from "Larb (Ute Tobacco)" but no content on the page to support the redirect. What up wit dat? 67.164.125.7 (talk) 05:32, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: See section Kinnickinnick below re smoking. If there are no objections I will add the info, & tie in "Ute tobacco" provided I can source it. D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 22:58, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Larb? 

message: Uva-ursi leaves are used by some First Nations/Native Americans both for ceremonial smudging and in the smoking mixture Kinnickinnick, see Bearberry. I propose adding a brief mention in the Medicinal Herb section; while it's not quite medicinal, it hardly seems worth a separate section for Ceremonial/recreational use. I hesitate because afaik use is confined to the one species, and in view of the discussion above re familiarity/usage of bearberry vs manzanita it might be confusing. If anyone knows of similar use of other Manzanita spp. it would help -- I'll dig a little myself. I'll watch this space for a few days before going ahead. D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 22:47, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kinnickinnick
Talk:Same-sex marriage in Ontario

message: I know I probably missed something when I attempted to repair the vandalism, so if you know what is missing, please re-add it. Spinboy 19:53, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's worth mentioning. -- Spinboy 03:23, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

text: I think it's worthy of inclusion. Links are allowed to be biased, and it adds to the article. Ardenn 02:59, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On April 11, 2006, NTK replaced the Canadian flag in the "Gay rights in Canada" template with a rainbow version of the Canadian flag. 
He also deleted the provincial/territorial flag from each provincial/territorial article. 
What are your views on that? 
Since this is only one of the articles affected, please give your comments at this central location: Template talk:GR-C 
Wuzzy 03:40, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is rainbow Canada flag better? Should provincial/territorial flags be reinserted?

message: There are a few claimants for "first legally married same-sex couple in Canada".  Xtra has a story about it that's a good reference.
There was at least one couple who were the same sex and legally married before all this: Linda Fraser and Georgie Scott of Nanaimo B.C., who were married in 1997, before Georgie's MTF sex change in 1999.  They are well known due to being the subjects of the documentary "Two Brides and a Scalpel", but I doubt that's the only case of a married person having a legal sex change.
The first legal marriages performed in recent times were those by Brent Hawkes on 14 January  2001 (Banns called 10, 17 and 24 December, 2000).  They were registered on 11 June 2003.
--Well, there's room to debate the legality there, since Hawkes violated the requirement that neither of the participants are supposed to have previously been married in order to be eligible for the banns. Lsibley 02:24, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Useful link: Who's on first?

message: I was surprised not to see anything about 1994's Bill 45 (An Act to amend the Human Rights Code with respect to Sexual Orientation, Tim Murphy's private member's bill) and Bill 167 (the government's bill called An Act to amend Ontario Statutes to provide for the equal treatment of persons in spousal relationships and/or Equality Rights Statute Law Amendment Act, 1994) in here, each early (probably first) attempts to legislate same-sex spousal rights (using the term "spouse") in Ontario.  Although 167 failed (and I assume 45 also failed) both are certainly significant.  Just read back through Hansard to see what was said.  I was actually hoping to find an external link to records of vote history on these bills, but I think Ontario online records only go back to 1995, so the 1994 votes wouldn't necessarily be available (at least, from there). 
1999's Bill 5, An Act to amend certain statutes because of the Supreme Court of Canada decision in M. v. H. is available at 
24.57.239.43 (talk) 02:46, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill 167, Bill 45, Bill 5
Talk:The Little Rascals (disambiguation)

message: I set up this page as a disambiguation page because the title "The Little Rascals" also refers to the 1982 cartoon series and the 1994 movie...and for the categories both would fall under, a browser looking for "The Little Rascals" may not recognize the "Our Gang" name.
--b. Touch 19:53, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Alleged tomb of Jesus

message: Isa is an Islamic prophet who predates Muhammed. This tomb, according to this article, is related to the Ahmadiyya interpretation of Islam, and is trans-religious. I would suggest letting the author expand the discussion of this specific historic site, as I believe there are several alleged tombs of Jesus.
This article is very new. Please give the author an opportunity to develop it, and perhaps constructive criticism in doing so. - Amgine 19:56, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Question
Category talk:Hundreds of England

message: What should be done about the wapentake espcially in yourkshire?--Jirate 20:06, 2004 Nov 25 (UTC)
The same as with Hundreds... if there are articles, categorize them as Wapentakes of England and list them under Geography of England, and History of England maybe. Sortior 03:15, Nov 26, 2004 (UTC)
In intend writing articles about the wards that Cumberland and Westmorland were divided into would it be right to place them in this category as they were practically identical to hundreds.
Penrithguy 19:21, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wapentake

message: I've divided this category by county. The category names might need to change for the counties that had wards or wapentakes, and Yorkshire could be subdivided. I'll leave that up to someone else to decide. MRSC (talk) 10:11, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Subdivisions
Category talk:Visual arts genres

message: See http://www.getty.edu/vow/AATHierarchy?find=computer&logic=AND¬e=&subjectid=300056462 for an example of the members of an art genre category Clubmarx 20:28, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)
how could abstract art not be in this category?
I agree, it needs to be included.
And why are some listed under sub-category rather than just genres? Each subcategory appears to be able to fit into genres.
It would take quite a bit of information architecture to organize everything into categories and sub-categories, then, there are those grey areas. I'm OK with having a giant list as long as there is no repetition. - jeb69
Fluxus should be added to this list. Everyone OK with that? - jeb69  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeb69 (talk • contribs) 15:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please, add Maximalism to the list.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.160.220.96 (talk) 10:20, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maximalism
Talk:William Symons

message: As with other Victoria Cross recipients, would it be possible to add when he was born and when he died? Thanks in advance, <KF> 20:31, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)
:Yes it would. Do you know the dates?--Light current 01:26, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Olaus Rudbeck

message: Should this article perhaps be moved? He usually wrote his own name Olaus Rudbeck, with the given name in its Latin form, and the family name without the Latin ending that his father (Bishop Johannes Rudbeckius) used. In Sweden today he is better known by the completely Swedish Olof Rudbeck. I don't think the situation is analogous with that of Linnaeus, who is definitely better known in English with the Latin form of the name (as opposed to the post-ennoblement Carl von Linné, by which he is usually referred to in Sweden), as Rudbeck isn't nearly as famous outside Sweden as Linnaeus is. / up+land 20:50, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of South Park episodes

message: Requested edit to the Home Media section, Season 25 (UK region 2) was released on DVD on 1st May 2023.https://www.amazon.co.uk/South-Park-Complete-Twenty-Fifth-Season/dp/B0BYF93467 Jc13jach (talk) 19:24, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 July 2023 

message: I think the reference list is broken, can someone help fix it? Xery1234 (talk) 18:12, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  references list 

message: I feel like the South Park specials on Paramount+ don't count as actual episodes. I know that the "Post COVID" specials are supposed to serve as a continuation of the "South ParQ Vaccination Special" from season 24, but "The Streaming Wars" (parts 1 and 2) and the recent special "Joining the Panderverse" don't serve as a continuation of anything, they're just regular specials that are also known as "exclusive events". 2601:195:C001:2630:C92C:700F:2AB9:FC50 (talk) 14:50, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been discussed in the past and the consensus was to treat the specials as episodes.  Barry Wom (talk) 15:28, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paramount+ specials 

message: Paramount+ just revealed a new South Park special titled "Not Suitable for Children" (no, really, that's what the title of it is). The trailer for it on Paramount+'s official YouTube channel (which is unlisted) said it was now streaming, but I don't know if that's true. Here's the link to it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8nKhZY--0g 2601:195:C001:2630:64FB:4C0:4055:43E0 (talk) 17:26, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Paramount+ special 

message: Hey, I didn't feel like doing this without asking first, but do you think we could get rid of the horizontal TOC template in the article with all the season numbers and specials? Because it's a bit of a mess. I know some of these articles already have it, like List of The Simpsons episodes for example, but for this article, I don't think we need it anymore. AndrewTheWikiEditor (talk) 00:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horizontal TOC template with the season numbers and specials
Talk:Valery Sablin

message: Taken, apparently, from 
http://www-cgsc.army.mil/carl/resources/csi/Zwygart/zwygart.asp .
Copyvio?
Charles Matthews 21:44, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Two things
Sablin was a captian third rank
The Storozhevoy was a Kirvak I Class BPK (large anti-submarine) Destroyer
read the last "Sentry"  Naval Institute Press
According to a recent radio program of France Inter
http://www.franceinter.fr/emission-rendez-vous-avec-x-novembre-1975-mutinerie-a-bord-du-vrai-octobre-rouge
whose main sources are listed on the above webpage, Sablin surrendered after the Storozhevoy had been hit multiple times and had taken numerous casualties. 
The statement "Sablin surrendered after several bombs were dropped in front of and behind the ship." seems wrong: not "in front of" and "behind", they were dropped "on" the ship.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nedboubacan (talk • contribs) 17:48, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Mutiny 

message: What do we know about his true unvarnished political views? Anybody, without propandistic POV? Dr. Dan 02:17, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Some Facts, Please

message: In this article:
"His second in command, Alexander Shein, received an eight-year prison sentence."
Compare
On the other page, about the boat itself, it says this:
"Sablin was executed by firing squad, while Shein was sentenced to prison and was released after serving over 10 years there."
It dosen't really fit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.14.175.66 (talk • contribs) 
:Both could be correct, he might have been sentenced for eight years but ultimately spent over ten years in prison! --DelftUser 09:45, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something's wrong? 

message: Hi! i recently deleted the section on Sablin being a character in the HOI4 mod TNO. Previous examples of users attempting to note a character's existence in TNO have been struck down for not reaching a notability threshold (see taboritsky's talk page.) even the creators of the mod (of which i am one!) have asked players to stop doing this: https://www.reddit.com/r/TNOmod/comments/jaieni/please_do_not_deface_wikipedia/  Charlesthe50th, Talk 03:52, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mod "the new order" lacks notability