lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:EudraPharm

message: This article is part of a series of articles trying to provide additional information on several aspects of clinical development (trying to fill some gaps). Pvosta 11:20, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:EudraGMP

message: This article is part of a series of articles trying to provide additional information on several aspects of clinical development (trying to fill some gaps). Pvosta 11:21, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:RAGE (receptor)

message: Hi, i created the RAGE(receptor) page. What are the suggestions for clean-up? (unsigned, 05:24, 19 October 2006 User:Inside x)
:I removed the cleanup tag it looks clean to me. linas 13:26, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Hi.  Thanks for the page, the information is very helpful.  Could you cite specific sources for the section entitled "RAGE and disease" with a linked footnote?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaynano (talk • contribs) 22:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Louis R. Vitullo

message: I'm intending to include more information about his professional career within the next 48 hours. - Mgm|(talk) 11:28, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for the delay. While I was away, I've been provided with a multitude of extra sources I need to sort and read. - Mgm|(talk) 04:57, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Upcoming edits

message: Just to note here that we received an e-mail from a relative correcting the names of Louis children. The ticket is available under #2008073010004153. Please contact anybody with access to the system if you require further information. Nick (talk) 11:24, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: OTRS
Talk:Kasganj

message: Kasganj is famaous for Making Khadhais and Sohan Papdi's.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.124.34.147 (talk) 17:14, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

message: There are many things which are famous in this region mainly on Nadrai Gate. The most Famous Is Lala Roshan Lal Sweets Centre which is very famous in sweets and very much liked by taste in neighbourhood cities. In clothing shops Rohtas Selection which is near Clock Tower is very much good and appreciated by this region citizens. It have mens,Ladies , and childs suit are also there.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prateekrohatgi5 (talk • contribs) 13:45, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous In Kasganj 

message: There are many things which are famous in this region mainly on Nadrai Gate. The most Famous Is Lala Roshan Lal Sweets Centre which is very famous in sweets and very much liked by taste in neighbourhood cities. In clothing shops Rohtas Selection which is near Clock Tower is very much good and appreciated by this region citizens. It have mens,Ladies , and childs suit are also there.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prateekrohatgi5 (talk • contribs) 13:47, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous In Kasganj 

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—106.67.106.176 (talk) 08:48, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't specified what you think to be erroneous. I've tweaked the coordinates a bit to indicate a location nearer the center of the city, but if you still think there is an error, you'll need to give a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 16:04, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: kadarganj pukhta Pramodrathoer (talk) 18:33, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  vijay Browbby Rathore 

message: Hello Wikipedians,
Citation needs to get added in the History section in the sentence beside the word " sixteenth century" 
Here is the citation link to get added as citation in the sentence "The city was known as Yaqoot Ganj in the early sixteenth century"
Link : https://dictionary.sensagent.com/Kasganj/en-en/
Please take out some time to check and consider my suggestion related to addition of citation. Prudent CAS (talk) 12:50, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition Of Citation
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/MER-C

message: Edit Count for MER-C
Total edits	18940
Main:	        8177
Talk:	        562
User:	        1168
User talk:	5361
Wikipedia:	3174
Wikipedia talk:	74
Image:	        214
Image talk:	11
Mediawiki:	0
Mediawiki talk:	0
Template:	108
Template talk:	2
Help:	        2
Help talk:	0
Category:	26
Category talk:	10
Portal:	        44
Portal talk:	7
MER-C edit count per Tangotango's edit count tool as of 11:37, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, my tool (or rather, Essjay's tool) was giving incorrect results, so here are the results from Interiot's "wannabe kate" tool as of 19:28, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Vermeer Dutch Chocolate Cream Liqueur

message: This content was taken out as being unsourced: "Critics of the drink think it has a "rather sickly taste" and on some blogs comments have been written stating that consumers have bought bottles that have "gone off". Others have criticised the "rather cheesy tagline of 'This must be what the Angel's drink' " and one went as far as to call the drink "An insult to the artist Vermeer"." I don't know where these descriptions came from or if they are notable, but I am noting them here in case someone wants to look into them. ChildofMidnight (talk) 16:10, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: criticisms?
Talk:Geometric integrator

message: This page seems a little misleading. The reason that the midpoint rule gives an accurate answer is that the acceleration is constant. The midpoint is actually the analytical solution when the acceleration is constant. However, this is not generally applicable to systems where the acceleration is not constant. Mattopia 11:37, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What makes you think that the acceleration is constant? Isn't acceleration = q = −sin q. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 12:30, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I see my mistake. The article states that the acceleration due to gravity is g=1, but actually the acceleration itself is not constant. (OK, so its a simple pendulum and it should be obvious...I guess I didn't look hard enough). Mattopia 16:05, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constant acceleration 

message: The text says:
>We plot, in \mathbb R^2, the exact trajectories and the numerical solutions of the system.
, but I don't see the exact trajectories on the picture.
89.135.16.141 (talk) 05:07, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the thin lines (closed curves around the equilibria) are the exact trajectories. The two thick lines are the numerical solutions. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 13:50, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exact trajectories are missing. 
Talk:Judge Castillo

message: The profile on the external link is inaccuare: she last appeared in 2000 AD some years after "Unjudicial Liasons," in (T think) "Cold Comfort" in prog 1225.Richard75 13:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a thread on the 2000 AD forum  where you can post suggestions for corrections of the database. (Emperor 13:55, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.Richard75 15:28, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2000 AD profile 

message: This is quite a short article, and there probably is not much more that can be added, except a picture. I'm thinking of moving it to List of minor characters in Judge Dredd. I would welcome any opinions. Richard75 20:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: She has appeared in 9 stories but I'd be pushed just looking down the list to place her role. If this entry could be expanded further then I'd say keep it but I'm prepared to accept your word for the fact that this is about as big as it is going to get, so merge it unless someone comes along saying they can add more. (Emperor 20:44, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In the absence of any dissent I have merged the article. Richard75 14:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:The Life of Mammals

message: Restoring the fair use image that was deleted might be a good idea. Richard001 (talk) 22:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: As per my efforts on previous David Attenborough series articles (see Life on Earth through The Life of Birds), I have expanded this article and will gradually add individual episode summaries, each of equal length. Chris 42 11:49, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanded article
Talk:Henry Edward Manning

message: Why is the name of this article so strange?
Unless anyone objects I propose to move the page to Henry Manning which is more inline with normal WP naming conventions.
Thruston 11:54, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: What musty old tome has most of this article been copied from?!) (undo) *--Felix folio secundus 21:11, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Well, I've been considering what this gentleman's WP:COMMONNAME is/was:
*"Henry Manning" -"Edward Manning" -"Henry Edward Manning" cardinal Archbishop OR Westminster: 6,460 hits
*-"Henry Manning" "Edward Manning" -"Henry Edward Manning" cardinal Archbishop OR Westminster: 7,150 hits
*-"Henry Manning" "Henry Edward Manning" cardinal Archbishop OR Westminster: 28,400 hits
All of which would strongly suggest that the status quo is correct. However – it does seem to suggest that the man is/was not exclusively referred to be both forenames. There is a chance that our the results above are skewed by encyclpaedias & other reference works (even this one) tending to use full names. Since it seems to me that he was called Edward, but is/has since been assumed all too often (because of uses of his full name) to have rather been a Henry, should we consider Edward Manning (bishop)? DBD 20:16, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry? Edward? Henry Edward? 

message: The article says:
For a comparison of Manning and Newman, see the section entitled "Newman and Manning" in the article on Cardinal Newman.
But this section has evidently been deleted, perhaps it was too sympathetic to Strachey's account?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.13.206.170 (talk) 22:00, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The missing link 

message: All references I can find say that Manning was born in 1808.  Unless a very reliable reference can be found otherwise then the article goes with the available references. Anglicanus (talk) 11:40, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth 
Talk:Biuret

message: Until more information becomes available, it may be productive to merge this with the Biuret test stub, with the test article being a subsection. Biblefreak123 01:34, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No thanks. The two articles stand alone. Buki ben Yogli (talk) 19:50, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Biuret Test 

message: On 2009-08-14, someone replaced this sentence
:"Biurets can be prepared by trimerization of isocyanates. For example the trimer of 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate is also known as HDI-biuret."
by this sentence
:"Although aliphatic isocyanate biurets 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate has the same functionality (NCO functionality is 3) with trimerization products of isocyanate,but biuret and trimer have different chemical structure."
The first one seemed to make more sense than the second one, so I reverted the edit.  Wouldplease some expert check and fix as appropriate? Thanks, --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 03:20, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Biurets and isocyanates

message: The preferred configuration involves a hydrogen atom of a nitrogen atom next to an oxygen atom to facilitate hydrogen bonding within the molecule, as shown in this image, but the current SMILES does not reflect this and has the two oxygen atoms pointing the same way and next to each other, resulting in unfavorable electrostatic repulsion between the two oxygen atoms. I have tried N\C(=O)N/C(N)=O, O=C(N)/N\C(=O)/N, N\C(=O)\N/C(=O)\N, and more, but none of them work. Could someone please create and add a SMILES that accurately represents biuret's preferred shape? Care to differ or discuss with me? The Nth User 02:57, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  SMILES
Talk:Inis Beag

message: Hi, I have added a text on how this work was received. I also went through the article and tried to make the text clearer. Messenger's descriptions, as reported here, don't seem particularly accurate to me (e.g. based on other writers about the Aran Islands, e.g. JM Synge, Liam Ó Flaithearta and Tomás Ó Flaithearta). However, I have not read Messenger's works and have instead tried to focus on making the article clear and moved to attribute material to the sources rather than stating things as fact. I have assumed that these sources do indeed say what they do here, though it's possible that they do not. More work needed here. Ballystrahan (talk) 11:09, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections 

message: If people were so incredibly uptight about sex, how did this outsider anthropologist ever get them to tell him all about how they had missionary-position sex in the dark with their clothes on? Credulity (talk) 00:09, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of his information 

message: This article is categorized as a fictional location. If it is one, it should be tagged using :Template:Fiction. 108.218.12.104 (talk) 17:04, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fiction 

message: I am extremely skeptical as to Messenger's study. Anyone else feel the same? EricthePinko (talk) 16:30, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Skepticism
Talk:Velar ejective stop

message: This article could possibly be merged with the article Ejective.  Do we need a separate article for each point of articulation? I am not declaring policy, just raising a question on how best to organize these articles.  There is much good material here, but I wonder if this is the best place toput it. Pete unseth (talk) 12:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not quite.  There aren't pages for palatalized, labialized, or aspirated sounds, nor for individual diphthongs or triphthongs.   "ejective" is a type of laryngeal property applied to sounds that have place and manner of articulation features that correspond to other non-ejective consonants.  [p], [t], [k], [q], and [s] are by far not the only plausibilities for consonants with ejective realizations and their selection is somewhat arbitrary.  — Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 17:40, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

message: Much of this description is describing a plain ol' /k/.
For everyone's benefit, could there be a "How this differs from English" section? That would cut to the chase, by detailing the nature of the difference between the rare sound and the familiar sound?
Thanks, Varlaam (talk) 19:41, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: For non-specialists

message: How do you say that? K-apostrophe? K-prime? K-ejective?
Varlaam (talk) 19:49, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's pronounced [k`].  Using the Unicode system of naming, the glyph would be called "Latin small letter K with apostrophe," though it should be noted that there is no actual glyph with that name (Unicode uses two glyphs to indicate ejectives).  As a practical matter, if I couldn't make the sound I would just say, "velar ejective." —WikiMarshall (talk) 06:40, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name?

message: could someone please add this, much better reference for Scottish English:
Journal of the International Phonetic Association, Volume 43, Issue 3 (Non-pulmonic sounds in European languages), December 2013 , pp. 273-298
"Ejectives in Scottish English: A social perspective" by Owen McCarthy and Jane Stuart-Smith
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100313000212  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.237.157.80 (talk) 09:03, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  better reference for scottish english
Talk:Velarization

message: I don't remember Russian having any velarized consonants. I'm deleting Russian as an example here until someone proves me wrong.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.185.21.163 (talk) 02:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The "hard" consonants of Russian are velarized. —Angr If you've written a quality article... 05:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

message: This article only seems to deal with voiced velarization (i.e. gamma superscript). Can we get some info about, for example, Lakhota voiceless velarization? Kielbasa1 (talk) 10:47, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The symbol does not imply voicing, no more than ‹ʲ› or ‹ʷ› do. Something like "/tˣ/" is basically shorthand for /tʰˠ/ (as velarized aspiration is basically [x̞] & can also be realized as [x], much like how [hʲ] = [ç˕] ≈ [ç]). Lakhota would still probably make a good example of a language that has velarization of a voiceless segment in particular… --Trɔpʏliʊm • blah 18:34, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voiceless velarization? 

message: Include... what? Tell me!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.13.238.92 (talk) 11:10, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I will agree that the formatting was challenging to follow.  I fixed it to the best of my ability, but it still is imperfect.  Is it at least clearer?LakeKayak (talk) 14:49, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other languages that have this distinction in some form include
Talk:Vocal tract

message: The value of 17.5 cm. given here does not come with a citation. I imagine it is based on the assumption that a uniform tube with one closed end, with formant values of 500, 1500, and 2500 Hz. (for F1, F2, and F3), will have a length of 17.5 cm. This directly follows from the formula for determining resonance values for such a tube (Fn = c(2n-1)/4L). These formant values are nicely rounded for the purposes of explaining the concept of resonance, but may not reflect the most typical values for adult males.
Stevens (1999) cites work by U. G. Goldstein (1980), who, in his dissertation, claims that a male vocal tract will have a length of 16.9 cm. and a female a length of 14.1 cm. I haven't read this original source, but Stevens' work is the standard for any work on acoustic phonetics. Should the value of 17.5 cm. be changed?Lingboy (talk) 14:02, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Voiced alveolar affricate

message: Isn't this also the sound at the end of the English word "heads"?·:RedAugust 20:20, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  That is analyzed as a stop + fricative.  It's a subtle distinction and phonetically is very similar.  Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 00:41, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They may say it, and while I do accept that, I still can't really believe it completely (and still believe I use the affricate!). It seems to be a pervasive thought among native English speakers that this really is [d͡z]! I wonder why? Double sharp (talk) 14:38, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

text: We should mention this in the article: why it's not considered part of English. --Makkachin (talk) 01:53, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  English 

message: the double bar in "ð̳": shouldn't this be explained?  i dont see it as an ipa diacritic or character.68.150.86.232 (talk) 09:55, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  equal sign 

message: I believe [d͡z] is at least regionally present in German. For example the "z" in Zara (the shop) is pronounced by some with [t͡s] and by some with [d͡z]. This is personal experience, so I don't have any sources to cite. IDon'tFindAName (talk) 23:57, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [d͡z] in german
Talk:Voiced alveolar fricative

message: Ashes in Vietnamese is Tro, not Gio.
lhtran  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lhtran (talk • contribs) 05:11, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Vietnamese Gio

message: I think it's far more common than a genuine alveolar tap.  and  (devoiced here) sound to me more genuinely RP than  or , with an actual tap. The amount of friction might not be the greatest, so it might be best described as a somewhat constricted apical alveolar approximant.
It'd be great if we found a source that discusses it... Mr KEBAB (talk) 13:17, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alveolar tapped fricative for /r/ in conservative RP 

message: Under the listing for the "voiced alveolar tapped fricative", under Turkish:
Even though the r in "rüya" seems to be said to be the aforementioned sound, the study cited instead mentions a "voiced fricated alveolar tap".
This is confirmed by both the recording for the "voiced alveolar tapped fricative" differing from what it actually is, and my İstanbul Turkish accent (the de-facto "standard" accent) and that of many others around me.
As I'm not a specialist regarding phonetics, I have refrained from making any edits from the fear I might be mistaken. Please make, or tell me to make appropriate changes if I am not. KaanK06 (talk) 16:02, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wrong ignore this KaanK06 (talk) 11:35, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misquote regarding the Turkish "Rüya" 

message: Under the listing for the "Dentalized laminal alveolar", under Russian: 
The translation for заезжать (zaezžat') is listed as 'to pick up'. The translation for this term is 'to drive into' or 'to stop by'. 2601:600:8F00:C3B:D12C:62C5:C318:7FDB (talk) 02:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible mistranslation regarding Russian 'заезжать'
Talk:Voiced dental and alveolar lateral fricatives

message: I'm not sure if this kind of description can be added (if it's "scientific" enough or something):
* Something between R (the Spanish version) and L
* Sounds like what small children with R disorder might say (I did when I was little; my language has Spanish style R)
--Sigmundur (talk) 21:55, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: AFAIK, neither of those are true.  — Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi] 22:33, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

text: The voiced version of [ɬ] does sound a lot like [lʒ], that's why the IPA symbol is a ligature of the two.  Lsfreak (talk) 17:06, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  more description