Talk:List of International Cricket Council members

message: The Rankings of the full members in the forms of cricket are not up to date as of July 14 2019  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.163.154.139 (talk) 09:32, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Rankings of Full Members in Test, ODI, T20I, WODI and WT20I 

message: Should teams that have played (or in the case of Oman, scheduled to play) an ODI be highlighted in some way? What about Japan, for instance, which although affiliate has played ODI matches in women's cricket? I think this would be a useful distinction to draw in certain cases. Also, current World Cup qualifiers who are currently authorized to play ODIs against full members and even each other should probably be highlighted in some way too. TheGrappler 07:03, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps some footnotes?  Women's cricket is tricky - Ireland has played Women's Test cricket, for example, but not Zimbabwe or Bangladesh; and there is a list of teams that have played in Women's one-day international cricket. -- ALoan (Talk) 07:27, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Members who have played at least one ODI

message: What is incomplete about the list of affiliate members? The ICC website lists only those countries.
Lemmy Kilmister 11:36, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Affiliate members 

message: The colour coded map is incorrect (or at least, doesn't match the list in the article) in many points, e.g. Botswana's status. I don't know how to edit the map, but perhaps its creator can fix it.
Ordinary Person 22:57, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map is wrong 

message: The article claims that the United States is suspended, but this is not given in the cited source. -- JeffBillman (talk) 20:10, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct source added. IgnorantArmies (talk) 06:51, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status of the United States 

message: Now just two levels; Full Member and Associate Member. Source Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 08:34, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Affiliate members are no more 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on List of International Cricket Council members. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131102090613/http://sports.af/afghanistan-cricket-receives-associate-status-2013-06-27/ to http://sports.af/afghanistan-cricket-receives-associate-status-2013-06-27/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724135802/http://static.icc-cricket.yahoo.net/ugc/documents/DOC_1BA6E55AE33E6588710706CF725AF0DC_1250055256330_248.pdf to http://static.icc-cricket.yahoo.net/ugc/documents/DOC_1BA6E55AE33E6588710706CF725AF0DC_1250055256330_248.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.asiancricket.org/c_myanmar.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:53, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: In the article it is written as fact that the ICC now requires full members to fulfil certain criteria over an eight year period in order to retain full membership. However there is nothing about this in the latest news and the only source for it is an article which was discussing the proposed changes and which details Bangladesh's challenge to these changes and notes other (unnamed) members' disquiet about the proposals.209.236.26.254 (talk) 00:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've had a trawl through coverage following the recent meetings (where Ireland and Afghanistan promoted) and can't find any further mention of these proposals being passed, so am going to remove this. Spike 'em (talk) 13:30, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retention of full membership  

message: The members of ICC are the national governing bodies, not the teams that they administer. This was brought into focus as I have been trying to edit page to reflect USACA being expelled but the USA national teams still exist. If no-one objects I will change links to be to a flag and relevant governing body / cricket board. Spike 'em (talk) 13:19, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I have also edited the Template:National cricket teams, which links back here, so an alternative is to rename this list as "List of national cricket teams"? Looking at football as a comparison, I see there is List of FIFA Member Associations, a redirect to a section of List of men's national association football teams which lists teams rather than the FAs that they represent. Spike 'em (talk) 14:20, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

text: As a guide ICC members page states : Full Members/ Associate Members are the governing bodies for cricket of a country recognised by the ICC Spike 'em (talk) 14:46, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links should be to Cricket Associations, not teams 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on List of International Cricket Council members. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120629083244/http://icc-cricket.yahoo.net/newsdetails.php?newsId=20711_1340883300 to http://icc-cricket.yahoo.net/newsdetails.php?newsId=20711_1340883300
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140712065502/http://www.icc-cricket.com/news/2014/media-releases/80822/results-of-icc-board-meeting-in-melbourne to http://www.icc-cricket.com/news/2014/media-releases/80822/results-of-icc-board-meeting-in-melbourne
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120629083244/http://icc-cricket.yahoo.net/newsdetails.php?newsId=20711_1340883300 to http://icc-cricket.yahoo.net/newsdetails.php?newsId=20711_1340883300
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110924022422/http://icc-cricket.yahoo.net/newsdetails.php?newsId=10632_1277978940 to http://icc-cricket.yahoo.net/newsdetails.php?newsId=10632_1277978940
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:16, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: How many cricket teams are there in the world 2405:205:C8C9:94F4:E04D:44F9:5733:BEC (talk) 14:45, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cricket 

message: The redirect ICC members has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:48, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:ICC members]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]