lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Heteroflexibility

message: Improve article by adding well done studies using secondary sources
Team 5B cites a study with a specific example of what heteroflexibility is. The team explains heteroflexible men as being attracted to male genitalia but not identifying as bisexual. Overall the team does an excellent job; if anything I think another study would be beneficial for the reader’s understanding since the article itself is relatively short. 
Team 5b presents a neutral perspective by citing a study and explaining the history of gender fluidity over time without any bias. DanielPerez144 (talk) 16:28, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foundations II Group 5b Goals 

message: Do the group’s edits substantially improve the article as described in the Wikipedia peer review “Guiding framework”?
* Yes, this team added in a lot of new information from a good quality source.
Has the group achieved its overall goals for improvement?
* Goal: Improve article by adding well done studies using secondary sources. Team 5B cites a study with a specific example of what heteroflexibility is. The team explains heteroflexible men as being attracted to male genitalia but not identifying as bisexual. Overall the team does an excellent job; if anything I think another study would be beneficial for the reader’s understanding since the article itself is relatively short. 
Does the draft submission reflect a neutral point of view? If not, specify…
* The group provided information and statistics on the prevalence of heteroflexibility among women and men with a neutral point of view. They also neutrally cited a study that focused on the behaviors and thoughts of heteroflexible individuals. Christinewmin (talk) 16:41, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  UCSF Peer Review of Team 5b by Team 5a  

message: Multiple phrases express a similar concept to the title of this page, as the introductory paragraph mentions. The phrase "mostly heterosexual" has become predominant in the academic literature, and as such changing the title from "Heteroflexible" to "Mainly Heterosexual" would be desirable.
:How about Cultural Strategies for Avoidance of Bisexual Self-Identification?
:Nuttyskin (talk) 23:54, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving page title
Talk:Force (cereal)

message: This article has been kept following this AFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:12, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: AFD debate link

message: Surely not, right? These are American products, after all, and calling someone 'Sonny Jim' is extremely Scottish.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:448:C300:6E10:9CDE:B474:4524:AE30 (talk) 07:35, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did the food brands actually inspire the slang term?
Talk:Telephone number pooling

message: Needs examples, this is a step away from plain ol gibberish to a reader not acquainted with many of the terms.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.208.242.182 (talk) 00:32, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

message: Seconding the above. This is very poorly written. For example, it's entirely unclear where specifically the 'pooling' comes in.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.68.94.86 (talk) 10:09, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: A step away from plain ol' gibberish

message: I should note, for completeness' sake, that I created this article with a  tag in it, because I can't back it all up with specific references (a lot of telecom info is not publicly documented) -- some of it is based on the general understanding picked up from what are primarily marketing sources. I marked it with the Dispute tag to encourage others who can confirm/deny my statements to do so, while providing reasonably good detail into a now-common but fairly undiscussed U.S. telecom practice. Better IMO to provide decent but imperfect info rather than no info. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ 07:15, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added some sources and removed the tag. K7L (talk) 16:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Preemptive dispute
Talk:Ofwat

message: This page will need to be renamed. As from 1 October 2005, OFWAT will be known as "Water Services Regulation Authority".--Smiker 07:52, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed requested move because (a) the new name (and structure) will now not be in place until 1 April 2006  and (b) the name change is uncontroversial and not impeded by technical difficulties, and therefore should simply be carried out, at the appropriate time. Rd232 09:09, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As the initiator of the request, I concur. Thanks for the (more accurate) information. --Smiker 09:21, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the renaming task from the to-do list. At present there are no plans to rename Ofwat to the WSRA; instead, the WSRA is just replacing the role of the Director-General. "Ofwat" will continue to exist after 1st April 2006. RichF 15:10, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: I've been wondering whether it's necessary to have a list of the water companies on this page. I realise that Ofwat regulates the water companies, but perhaps there should be a separate page listing these companies, as with the list of US companies. Any thoughts? RichF 17:47, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You're quite right - a standalone list would be better. Rd232 talk 10:14, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. RichF 12:12, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are the water company links required? 

message: Declaring an interest as an employee of Ofwat. I've amended the list of Ofwat board members to reflect the up to date list on the Ofwat website.Ea pdm wmaster (talk) 15:20, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amended list of Ofwat board members
Talk:1975 New Zealand general election

message: * http://www.elections.org.nz/elections/FPP_seats_won.html
* http://www.elections.org.nz/elections/elections_dates_turnout.html
* http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/encyclopedia/n/ne/new_zealand_elections.htm
--2mcmGespräch 08:14, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: The Waitakere electorate existed for general elections from 1946 to 1966 and 1978 to 1984, having been replaced by Henderson for 1969, 1972 and 1975 (with Martyn Finlay as the MP). See for Waitakere results Norton pages 374 & 375. Hence I have removed references to Waitakere in this article. Hugo999 (talk) 10:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work, Hugo. I've tidied up . Schwede66 19:51, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waitakere electorate
Talk:Goodyera repens

message: What is the reference for it beeing the most common orchid in Scandinavia? I am a norwegian, my flora does not mention this. I am not sure, but I would think Dactylorhiza maculata is more common.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knut kbjno (talk • contribs) 16:04, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most common orchid in Scandinavia? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Maxine1947 (talk) 02:39, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Plant-Microbe Interactions Spring 2023
Talk:Constitution of the Soviet Union

message: How can the USSR have had a constitution in 1918, when it wasn't formed until 1922?! Silverhelm 08:43, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: old talk

message: Really? Who says so?Xx236 (talk) 13:54, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm guessing the constitutions themselves, although I haven't read them. If your issue is with the use of "guarantee," remember that no rights are absolutely guaranteed, by any constitution or government. If the Soviet constitutions said "the people have rights x, y and z," then that's a guarantee of those rights, even though it may not have been worth the paper it was written on.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.241.214.138 (talk) 02:14, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Yes, this text contradicts itself. This article is unsourced and terrible. I corrected it a little, but it needs a lot of work.Biophys (talk) 01:41, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just want to let it be known that I take issue with Biophys's edits, which I find to be transparently POV-pushing, but I'm too lazy/disinterested to get into yet another WP battle.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.241.214.138 (talk) 04:37, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Soviet constitutions guaranteed certain political rights, such as freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and freedom of religion
Template talk:Wikisourcecat

message: Shouldn't the link point to the English subdomain of Wikisource, i.e. http://en.wikisource.org/ and not http://wikisource.org/? --surueña 08:43, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikisource subdomains 

message: Hi fellow wikipedians! I have tried to make this template work more dynamic like
the Template:Commons, that is, making it accept option variables of where to
point to in Wikisource:

Variables can still be left out, that is, just stating  still works.
I hope it works like I intended it too. For safety, I have have saved the old code in the template (just commenting it out).
If I have made any mistake, I'd appreciate a message on my talk page.
My regards, Dennis Nilsson. --Dna-Dennis talk - contribs 06:54, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dynamics like in [[Template:Commons]]
Talk:José Luis Clerc

message: Cited link tenniscorner.net has no information whatsoever of the 1978 Florence open won by Clerc. Information of that tournament can be found at tennis.webz.cz. Mariano(t/c) 08:54, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The name of this article should be changed to "Jose Luis Clerc" because that is the name used on the English-language websites of the official governing bodies of tennis, which are the Association of Tennis Professionals and the International Tennis Federation.  This is also the name used on the English-language website of Davis Cup.  Tennis expert (talk) 05:02, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Elspeth Ballantyne

message: ==Untitled==
I noticed a Date of Death appeared and then was removed. Can anyone clarify? Essexmutant 09:02, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead or Not?

message: I noticed a Date of Death appeared and then was removed. Can anyone clarify? Essexmutant 09:02, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Spectacle Island (Hawkesbury River)

message: According to my (admittedly 10 year old) copy of UBD Sydney, the local government boundary goes down the middle of the main channel of the Hawkesbury River, leaving Spectacle Island to its north, in the area of Gosford City Council and hence outside metro Sydney. However the GNB web site (as quoted in references) explicitly states the island is in Hornsby Shire and hence (by the rules in the article List of Sydney suburbs) inside metro Sydney.
As the GNB is on the face of it the later source, I have assumed the boundary has moved since 1995 and gone with the GNB information. But I'm not very convinced; the boundary in my UBD seems such a natural boundary and it would seem perverse to move it just to include an uninhabited island. Can anybody throw any light on this?. -- chris_j_wood 09:35, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As I mentioned at Talk:List of Sydney suburbs, the GNB entry cannot be considered a later source (gazettal was in 1976). For local government boundaries, I think the GNB LGA maps are generally up to date, but I'd go with the Department of Local Government site  - they might have strange lists of suburbs, but they're the authority on the LGA boundaries. Both of these sources have Spectacle Island in Gosford, with the boundary as you describe. (And no, a parish is not the same as a suburb - the parishes are not used in general, like the counties. The GNB map puts it in the suburb of Mooney Mooney.) JPD 11:39, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  In metro Sydney?.
Talk:Multinomial distribution

message: The "Statistical inference" section should include a link to the "Multinomial test" page in Wikipedia - and viceversa. Rigonz (talk) 08:49, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multinomial test 

message: It is unclear that the support is positive integers.
The use of « x_i » instead of « n_i » as in the french version, or « k » as in the binomial distribution makes this further unclear.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scharleb (talk • contribs) 23:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that using x_i instead of n_i to denote counts is generally confusing. Furthermore, there is a confusing change in conventions along the article: the sample size originally denoted by n (lowercase), becomes N (uppercase) in the section of asymptotics and concentration theorems, while n denotes there the number of categories (microstates in statistical physics), originally denoted by k which in the section of conditional sampling denotes the number of empirical constraints.  I would suggest to use N for the sample size referring to large-N effective theories (large deviation theory in the standard language of statistics), n_i for sampled counts and L for the number of categories p_1,...,p_L OreLouk (talk) 11:20, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Concerning the number of independent linear constraints imposed on multinomial sampling, I would use d or D alluding to the dimensionality of a "model"  distribution q_1,...,q_L in the dual parametric formulation of I-divergence minimization. OreLouk (talk) 11:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Support
Talk:Robert de Grimston

message: I added a link, which is more complete. How long has the official website been under construction. I remember it going down c. 1997? Was it ever up again? In any case, somebody add it if and when there is a current one. I hope to eventually start The Process Church of The Final Judgment page. If I haven't by the time this is read, and you're interested, I'd like to help. Khirad 09:49, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Communist Party of Sweden (1995)

message: "Shortly thereafter, the entire KU district in Gävleborg joined APK."?
- No, it didn´t! My parents (for example) continued to be leading figures in KU also after the split.--194.71.24.5 10:05, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, but didn't the district change affiliation en bloc? which doesn't necessarily mean that all individuals in the district joined APK. --Soman 14:58, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is that part of the article name? It doesn't seem very fitting. Obviously, some distinction has to be made to differentiate it from the other Communist parties of Sweden, existing and former, but "(1995)" doesn't feel right. Jobjörn 21:43, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It goes in line with how other parties with identical names are differentiated. 1995 is the year the party was legally refounded with the name SKP. --Soman 09:44, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why (1995)? 

message: Should this article be split? (and a separte formed for APK) APK and SKP are the same essentially in every aspect except for the legal, but perhaps it would be easier to describe the historical development of APK in a separate article (and the events leading up to its formation). --Soman 15:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split article 

message: Iw ould be worth mentioning somewhere in the article that the party engages in Holodomor denial. http://www.skp.se/levande_historia/ukraina.htm --Dorpater (talk) 18:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Holodomor denial]]
Talk:Magnus (Marvel Comics)

message: Hi,
Does any one know what Magnus means??? I am trying to assimilate all the details, every single piece possible about 'Magnus'. Lemme know if you know of some good source where i can get such data...
-Gowtham.
gaumee@yahoo.com
:It's apparently from Latin and means "great", "big" (magnus). Brandmeister 23:12, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaning of the name

message: The original intro paragraph was taken, word for word, from Exiles #1 p14 - the scene where the Timebroker introduces Magnus to the team. Accordingly, I've deleted it. We could use a longer replacement intro, though. --Mrph 23:40, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Re: EM & flight--
The "official" explanation for Magneto/Magnus' flight powers in the Marvel Universe is the his personal magnetic field interacts with the Earth's magnetic field, allowing them to repel each other, essentially a form of magnetic levitation (wouldn't work in the real world, of course,  but comic book physics can be very forgiving). --  Noclevername 07:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright material?

message: Propose that the article be moved to a namespace like a host of other Marvel characters, and, the Magnus (comics) be utilized for :Roberto Raviola, commonly known as the Magnus (of comics), more so than the fictional alternate universe-son of Magneto.  Anyone have strong feelings and good reason why not? Murghdisc. 07:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No strong feelings about it, I agree in general to this move. Fram 09:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, having waited a few days this seems not controversial and I'll make the move. Murghdisc. 19:59, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: I know that the Magneto-Magnus is probably both more notable, and more well-known, but isn't it standard to have the oldest-appearing character shown first?  I don't have any strong feelings about this; just wondering. 24.148.15.188 06:49, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ordering of characters
Talk:Lim Chin Siong

message: When I first started editing Lim's wiki article, I realised that there were sections below such as:
"Questions about Communism"
"Description of Lim Chin Siong's politics from declassified British documents"
Which I felt doesn't quite add to the article. I've beefed up the parts concerning his life (from early years to later years), and will modify the section on "Legacy" instead to discuss the "communism" part.
--Owentan (talk) 13:21, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the irrelevant parts from Lim's bio 

message: The Article's first line states that Lim Chin Siong dies in 1996
However in the section 'Later Years' he is mentioned to  have dies in on 4 February 2017. 
That is in fact the date his earlier comrade Fong Swee Suan died. See https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/infopedia/articles/SIP_2013-07-29_173512.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sejtam (talk • contribs) 16:08, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mix up with Fong Swee Suan
Talk:British royal genealogy

message: Rather than re-spell it, can't we delete it? This is all better covered elsewhere. --Wetman 10:28, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

message: From Wikipedia:Guide to layout: "The subject of the article should be mentioned in bold text (subject) at a natural place, preferably in the first sentence, or else in the first paragraph. The name of the subject is normally identical to the page title, though it may appear in a slightly different form from that used as the title, or may include variations.  If the article is long enough to contain several paragraphs, the first paragraph should be short and to the point, clearly explaining the subject."
The subject of this article (?!) is not given in bold text in either the first sentence or the first paragraph.  Moreover, there is no first sentence, paragraph, or any introductory content at all. -Acjelen 15:15, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikification 

message: Hi, I'm Jim, I created this page and I took all your comments and used that to help make it better.
I am open to more comments. I want to make this page better.
Please note that pages should not be moved (renamed) by cutting and pasting the contents. See Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages for more details. DJ Clayworth 21:35, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Creator

message: I am redirecting this page to the "improved version" at Genealogy of the British Royal Family. -Acjelen 19:44, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Stem and leaf diagram

message: I feel that this article has accidentally duplicated another titled Stemplot. If anyone else agrees with me, I would suggest deleting it and redirecting any search on "Stem and Leaf" to the Stemplot page (unfortunately I'm not yet sufficiently competent to do that myself).
Jon Rob 15/9/05
:No problem, I will merge the two articles. My first intuition would be to use "Stem-and-leaf plot" as a name for the merged article, but it may be just a bias. Any opinion ? I should probably go back to one of John Tukey's books and see how he called them. Schutz 08:28, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: stem-and-leaf display seems to be the original name, according to the table of contents at , so we should maybe keep this one. Schutz 14:24, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

text: In fact, you are right, there is not much to merge from this article into stemplot - I will just add a redirection to the other one for now, pending a choice for the canonical name Schutz 14:24, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Goralenvolk

message: The information in here is mostly based on the website linked to at the bottom. It would be nice if someone could take a look at this who speaks Polish and can transfer some information from the Polish equivalent. Disclaimer: I had never heard about the Goralen before one hour ago, so I'm definitely not an expert. --Emilio floris 10:51, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yrjö Sirola

message: Could anyone who speaks Finnish please expand this article. I suggest by translating the longer article about Yrjö Sirola, that already exists in the Finnish Wikipedia. Thank you. 
User:Bronks September 15, 2005.
*I have translated it. It still needs proofreading by someone who is more familiar with the Finland-related articles on the English Wikipedia. — JIP | Talk 16:57, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: My database indicates that Sirola died of natural causes in 1936. Unfortunately, I don't have a record of where I gathered that tidbit, but I will point out that the Ezhovshchina (Great Terror) in the USSR that obliterated over 1 million people (and which struck with particular severity three groups to which Sirola belonged -- Communists, Comintern functionaries, and Finns) seems to have been green-lighted by Stalin, Molotov & Co. at the Feb.-March 1937 joint plenum of the Central Committee and Central Control Committee of the Russian Communist Party. In other words, Sirola's death apparently PRECEDED the Great Terror, which was essentially a 1937-38 phenomenon.
While it is not impossible that Sirola died in secret police custody in 1936, I would like to see a documented arrest date before I would jump to that conclusion or to commit to that outcome in print. I've removed reference to his death in the Great Terror pending this research and will look myself for some sort of definitive details about cause of death myself.
Tim Davenport -- Early American Marxism website -- Corvallis, OR -- Carrite (talk) 19:09, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Sirola's death was natural. According to his biographer, Erkki Salomaa, charges were being collected against him while he was still living, but he died before arrest." (Jukka Paastela: Finnish Communism under Soviet Totalitarianism Kikimora 2003, p. 114–115.) Sirola had been ill for few months before he died of stroke. (Erkki Salomaa: Yrjö Sirola Kansankulttuuri 1966, p. 345–348.)--Ap4k (talk) 14:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Death in the Purge?
Talk:Ted Owens (contactee)

message: Sources? Citations? Any actual backup information to justify these claims? --Firien § 11:09, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently just the Mishlove book, which User:Intelligences regards as gospel truth. Gazpacho 20:06, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled