lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Henninger Turm

message: It shall not be not demolished despite statements, which claim the opposite.
what does that mean!
:Presumably there were reports that the tower was going to be demolished and that is not the case.  Bollar 03:25, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
::Demolishion of the tower starts 7th January 2013. It will be replaced by a 130m tower with luxury flats. Uwe Sommerlad (talk) 15:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The Henninger Turm is demolished now. Development on the site begins in April 2014. Uwe Sommerlad (talk) 09:42, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It is clear that the new building needs, if at all, a new entry. Here the text mixes with the old silo tower, which had a very different function, and a very different importance as a historic landmark, while the new one is a building with luxury flats - neither a reconstruction, nor a homage, as the only reason it slightly reminds of the old Henninger Turm lies in the protests of the Frankfurt citizens against the demolition of the old tower. And it is a disgrace to the silo tower that even as a photograph a picture of the new luxury flat glass skycraper is used now!94.79.141.186 (talk) 13:39, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Henninger-Turm
Talk:Windmill

message: I don't think Wind turbines and windmills are the same thing at all. Windmills are clearly machines that use wind to mill e.g. grain. Wind turbines generate electricity (like a gas turbine or a steam turbine). In my view, the term 'windmill' is used disparagingly to create the perception that modern wind turbines are an archaic technology. Grandwilly (talk) 00:17, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wind Turbines vs Windmills 

message: From the first section;
"It has been claimed that the Babylonian emperor Hammurabi planned to use wind power for his ambitious irrigation project in the seventeenth century BCE.[7]"
This is a pretty dubious historical claim. The reference is a scientific work on windmills, without a doubt, but the author being cited has no credentials in history. The references that the author gives is to other non-historical academic works. According to Pennsylvania State University, windmills originated in the 9th century AD, i.e. the middle of the Middle Ages. That makes the above sentence so dubious that it ought to be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wallingfordtoday (talk • contribs) 22:13, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate sources on the history of windmills 

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether :Portal:Windmills is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Windmills until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 10:32, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[:Portal:Windmills]] for deletion 
Talk:Stress fracture

message: This reads very much like a copyvio, but I can't locate a source online.  Avocado 01:43, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
The phrase "more than 110 tons of energy" echoes the deceptive phrase used by marketers of hikers' trekking poles.  It should not be used here, copyvio or not, bcz energy cannot be measured in units of weight (unless you are doing total conversion of matter to energy ala Einstein.) --Jerzy (t) 19:21, 2005 Apr 29 (UTC)
* Yeah, I "loved" that line too -- so much I left it in. lol  For now it's a placemarker till I or anyone can find the real values for the stresses on leg bones, one of those mind-boggling numbers that makes you impressed to be a human being. If anyone out there beats me to it, even better. addesso 20:00, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: note

message: I've made a few additions and rearrangements. Could I suggest that the comment about '110 tons of energy' be refactored somehow?  Simply make the point that the lower limb is weightbearing, and that sudden increases of workload increase the physical stresses on the bone. - Richardcavell 08:37, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I've cleaned up a bit 

message: I have cancelled merger of this article with March fracture. I again searched for material regarding stress fracture and march fracture. I found that Stress fracture is a broader term, and a March fracture is the stress fracture of metatarsal bones only. so I think both the articles can coexist in wikipedia.  Ganesh Dhamodkar  (Talk) 02:49, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cancelled Merger 

message: "Investigations are not necessary to diagnose a stress fracture." I removed this sentence because it makes no sense at all. The Marriam-Webster on-line dictionary site defines "investigations" to mean  "to try to find out the facts about (something... to try to get information about". So this sentence says it is not necessary to get information or facts from the patient to diagnose a stress fracture?!?! I don't think so. I am guessing that the word "investigations" has a technical meaning in medicine or (more likely) this was written by a non-native English speaker, because the word would not be plural otherwise. Nick Beeson (talk) 12:24, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Investigations
Talk:Huggies

message: The advertising part needs to be messed up. It's really professional.
I concur  Xiecfox (talk) 19:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

message: If I can I will try to find out what took so long.  Perhaps the existing product line, Kimbies, was quite successful and they were afraid to risk confusing the public.  Or maybe the diapers were designed so much differently from previously existing diapers that they really did need ten years to make really sure they were doing the right thing. —Soap— 14:39, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  It took them ten years to bring it to market?
Talk:Runesocesius

message: All of these articles on Lusitanian deities are in need of serious editing.  Unfortunately, I have no resources available regarding the mythology of the Lusitanians and thus am not able to do more than correct some of the spelling and grammar.  Please feel free to expand this article in any way you can.
:I can find no credible sources that this deity even existed. Can anyone else? Paul S (talk) 18:38, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Wait, I can find him: Bulletin de la Société des Antiquaires de la France, 1899 pp. 269-273 by someone (Portuguese) calling himself J.L. de V. He describes a Roman dedication SANCTRVNESOCESIOSACRVGLIC...QVINTCINV...BALS which he interprets at containing two Celtic elements *run- meaning "mystery" and cesius as an allograph for 'gaesius' from *gaiso- meaning a spear or javelin. Hence this "mysterious javelin god". How is he part of a trinity, though? Can anyone else discover more? Paul S (talk) 19:50, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It all becomes clear: someone's Spanish is even worse than mine (which is saying something) 91.84.79.51 (talk) 11:25, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Serious editing

message: 95.69.111.27 reverts all my changes without explanation, putting them back to unsourced neo-Pagan fluffy-bunniness. Reversions reverted, and the admins will have to sort it out. Paul S (talk) 15:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit War

message: Okay, re-written again, hopefully there are now enough sources and explanations and the article is now completely neutral. The amount of debate this obscure god is generating is all out of proportion to what we know about him. Paul S (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 22:50, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Do have in consideration that   the Tartessian language is also open to debate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.214.77.101 (talk) 01:29, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh yes, nobody's 100% sure what Tartessian was. A year or two ago someone said they could read it as Celtic, but I've heard nothing else on that since then and imagine that this theory sank without trace in the end. I don't think I've heard anyone suggest that Tartessian was Lusitanian, though. Paul S (talk) 10:11, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Editing
Talk:Endovelicus

message: None of the external links is currently working. How are we supposed to deal with this? --Xyzt1234 (talk) 22:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  404s 

message: Here’s all that Olivares of the University of Alicante has to say in his article on the god at http://www4.uwm.edu/celtic/ekeltoi/volumes/vol6/6_12/olivares_6_12.html:
"The first thing that is seen from his inscriptions is the relationship of the god with the private or family environment. Of the 51 inscriptions to the god that have a named dedicator, 17 were by women, some 33% of the dedications. This is a very high proportion, much higher than for the rest of the Hispanic deities (excluding Arentius and therefore Vaelicus) and is similar to the data that we have for the dedications to the indigenous gods Apollo and Mercury in the rest of western Europe. The oracular and healing character of Endouellicus, and his association with the individual and the family are, in our opinion, the most outstanding features of the inscriptions, and they profile a divine typology comparable to that which we have for Lugus or Arentius, which is not contradicted by the location of the sanctuary of this god on a small hill."
Quite whence all the 'information' about 'Lucifer' in reference to this theonym comes in the temples and cults section, I'd love to know! The Spanish and Portuguese versions of this Wikipedia article are not nearly as lengthy. Clearly more must have been written in English about this god than in the languages of the countries of the Iberian peninsula where he was once worshipped!!!
G.M.Gladehall (talk) 12:51, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: What Olivares says

message: I am deleting the depiction of Endovelicus. Self art should be treated as self-investigation: original material, not relevant. Voj 2005 (talk) 11:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self art 

message: The link to the Paleohispánica magazine was deleted because it doesn't hold anything relatable to Endovelicus or the Lusitanian gods (but to Tartessic ones, at best): https://ifc.dpz.es/recursos/publicaciones/21/92/_ebook.pdf Voj 2005 (talk) 14:37, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted link
Talk:Ares Lusitani

message: JORGE DE ALARCÃO wrote that Estrabon might have mistaken the Lusitanian god of war Arentius/Arentia with Greek god Ares, because of the names similarity and the fact that both names refer to war gods. Should this article name be changed?189.70.125.239 (talk) 06:09, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Arentius
Talk:Ataegina

message: All of these articles on Lusitanian deities are in need of serious editing. Unfortunately, I have no resources available regarding the mythology of the Lusitanians and thus am not able to do more than correct some of the spelling and grammar. Please feel free to expand this article in any way you can.
:I've left the assertions by Moisés Espírito Santo in for now, but can anyone find sources? How respectable a source is he? Can anyone find anything about her assocation with cypress branches? Paul S (talk) 23:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not at all a respectable source. He is basically seen as an excentric inventor of mythologies. His works is held in little or no account, and is contradicted by almost all archeological and linguistic data (he is a sociologist, not at all and expert in historical, linguistic or archeological analysis). He defendes the crazy and impossible hipotesys that the Portuguese are basically of Phoenician (Canaanite) origin and spoke a Semitic language until the Middle Ages...! He should be left ou. The Ogre (talk) 16:17, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay - anyone who wants to keep MES speak now or forever hold your peace... Paul S (talk) 12:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

text: I left a message for Babel2675 who first added (fringe) theory, but (s)he doesn't seem to still be active (no talk for nearly 2 years) I'll snip the MES stuff. Paul S (talk) 19:45, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Serious editing
Talk:Robert G. Cole

message: I was amazed this MOH recipent has no Wikipage. I heard about him from BiA and felt he needed one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leavebeaver2me (talk • contribs) 01:51, April 22, 2005 UTC
This is so NOT written factualy "Dropped" "Shot up" "cold steel" this is written as if it were from a comic book.
^^^Well dude, I got that info from "Citizen Soldiers", one of the most acclaimed WWII history books, so there. Siegfried Waldgrave 16:44, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There was so much wrong with this I didn't know where to start to fix it, so I deleted it whole. The charge was not over "swampy" ground but along a dirt road leading from the highway to the farm house. There was no way to "outflank" the hedgerow--it ran from the farmhouse to the riverbank. The causeway was the only way into Carentan because the railroad embankment the Germans had used had been blown up west of town. The troopers were under constant mortar fire throughout June 10 and June 11. Both air and artillery support fires were used by the 101st in Normandy from D-Day on--a battalion of SP 105mm and a battalion of parachute 75mm howitzers supported Cole. The Germans jammed his radio frequencies until late in the battle. Throughout Normandy the Germans had to be rooted out of the hedgerows by infantry--supporting fires did not cut it.--Buckboard 09:37, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Criticism" deletion

message: The article mentions two birth dates: March 19, 1915 and April 17, 1915. Which one is correct? Wammes Waggel (talk) 18:31, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: birth date
Talk:Subject-object based metaphysics

message: The claim was made by user:Niteowlneils that this "smells like original research" I looked up this so called term and realize that it is the very thing that keeps wikipedia so static.  Anyhow, it is to some extent necessary.  So to address your remark I will say that this is Robert Pirsig's term for something that is crucial to another article the Metaphysics of Quality and the sources are his two books.  Defining  the "subject object metaphysics" in its own entry is no different than creating an entry for a character in a Dickens novel e.g. Ebenezer Scrooge... so you can't call this "original research"  I'm not introducing anything... real "original research" would be if I went out on the street and discovered something about the world and created an article about it.  For example... lets say I proposed a theory about cats, and how all the cats on my street are pregnant... THAT is original research.  What I did here was a small piece of a "book report." Haha and I am sorry for my poor abilities with spelling and grammar... that is why there are wonderful people like you to go around cleaning up for messy people like me... I mean this sincerely, thank you.  Without more detail oriented peopel this whole project would be a mess haha --Wraybm1 01:53, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research
Talk:Stratford, Ontario

message: What is the "Ontario freeway system". Any King's Highway can be a freeway, like neighbouring 7/8/85 in Kitchener, 2A, parts of 6, etc and any 400-series highway can be an expressway or super-2, like 406 and parts of 420. Suggest this section be reworded.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.55.4.235 (talk) 17:23, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ontario freeway system

message: The caption for the photo of Stratford's city hall reads:
City of Stratford, Ontario, Canada's Location.
huh? I'd change it , but it appears to be generated by a template. -Dhodges 17:48, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo caption 

message: 3rd paragraph states the name of the festival as it once was
in its founding year, but now that name is no more.  And it's NOT only "SHAKESPEARE fans" who come to see it, but many who don't even like Shakespeare come to see all the other plays. --Dunnhaupt 20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Shakespearean ?? Festival 

message: How is Bieber not in here???  I'm no fan, but c'mon...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.0.188.204 (talk) 13:17, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable Residents

message: Sorry guys, the music section should NOT be a place to advertise or otherwise plug virtually unknown singers and/or bands.
And on that note, it's simply ludicrous to have names such as Richard Manuel and Loreena McKennit on the same level as, say, Dana Manning and Colin Fischer, no matter how much they and/or a select fan may like to draw that parallel.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.92.203.29 (talk) 13:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music Section 

message: I have added the Canada/Ontario project tag and given an initial quality rating of "Start". The higher "B" rating might be earned if more references and citations are added to this article.  PKT (talk) 22:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality rating

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—131.100.160.133 (talk) 03:16, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't said what you think is erroneous about the coordinates. I've tweaked them a bit to indicate a point nearer the central business district of the town. If you still think that there's an error, you'll need to give a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 16:26, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error  @ com 

message: Please add to the Media section:
The Stratford Local is a local news, events and information site and mobile app.
If you wish to check it out first, it is at www.theStratfordLocal.com
Thank you. Fcmoore29 (talk) 19:06, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add to the Media section a new local news outlet called The Stratford Local
Talk:Edward Emerson Barnard

message: He spent only two months of his early life in school, receiving all of his education from his mother. Forced to help support her, Barnard took a job in a photography gallery when he was nine.
I see my lil' paragraph about E. S. Holden has been tagged for neutrality disputed. Probably a good thing - but what is the procedure here? Should I edit this to make it more neutral or leave it to be considered (I'm fairly new at this)? Lesonyrra 22:03, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I understand that in 1904 E.E.B. made the first known observation of a Trojan asteroid (the first discovery was by his friend Max Wolf in 1906).  Only recently was his observation identified as Trojan.
See http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/pressinfo/TheFirstTrojanObs.html  "The Earliest Observation of a Trojan" - Brian G Marsden.
94.30.84.71 (talk) 20:46, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  First recorded Trojan 

message: First section of this article states that Edward Emerson Barnard discovered Barnard's Star.
But article about Barnard's_Star state that "...E. E. Barnard. He was not the first to observe the star".
82.135.241.187 (talk) 07:47, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible contradiction
Talk:Highly Evolved

message: I do not think that the forwarding from "In the Jungle" is at all appropriate for this page. It is only the title of one track on this album and (I presume, since I have never heard this album or the band who recorded it) that that track is a cover of a famous song that has nothing to do with the band.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.151.168.127 (talk) 14:34, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect forwarding 
Talk:Tribal

message: Hi!
I think this page misses to cover the "art-form" called tribal.
Google Image search for tribal only results in tattoo-art, so why is it not mentioned here?
http://www.google.com/images?q=Tribal&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:de:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=univ&ei=kiQrTeG8MIXKswbmqIzcAg&sa=X&oi=image_result_group&ct=title&resnum=3&ved=0CD8QsAQwAg&biw=1152&bih=757  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevthethief (talk • contribs) 15:26, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tribal Art?
Talk:Duane Michals

message: Marked as a stub since the article still needs, list of publications, info on his big works, etc--nixie 02:55, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lyle Mays

message: Why have these selections been chosen for the "See also" section? --1000Faces (talk) 02:28, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also? 
Talk:Stallion (disambiguation)

message: I have not changed links to this page, as they appear to all be links to define stallion as a male horse. Taking the one-line definition to a new page called stallion (horse) and relinking all those pages just seemed unneccessary. --ScottDavis 03:27, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Although this is covered in the Wiktionary, and thus no link attached due to redundancy with the info-box, colloquial usage is not addressed by the main article, and shouldn't be. --Vorik111 (talk) 17:05, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metaphor
Talk:Pastry fork

message: As regards the Leites Culinaria, while it was an interesting read it doesn't explain anything about dough mixing or the handedness of pastry forks. It only mentions pastry forks once in a list and probably doesn't belong in this particular article, but perhaps could be useful for a more general one instead. Techhead7890 (talk) 19:24, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leites citation
Talk:Falling Up (band)

message: Why was this article deleted in the first place?  Was it before the band released a CD with a decently major Christian record label?  (Also, see Falling Up (album).) --Idont Havaname 03:40, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: "Recreation of deleted article"?

message: This should probably be merged with Falling Up, as the band and the album are closely related. I have tagged this article with a merge tag; if you disagree, please discuss here. Apologies if I lose interest in this; I guess I'm somewhat of a policy wanker, and have made this specific problem of VFD/VFU my current crusade. Now that it's over, I hope others will come in to deal with whether this should be merged, so I can go back to transportation-related stuff. --SPUI (talk) 23:11, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: The result of relisting this article on VfD was to keep.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Falling Up (band) for a record.  Postdlf 07:19, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second VfD 

message: I figured that this page is probably the best place to dump this suggestion. Thinking at this point it would be plausible to create a page for Jessy Ribordy, frontman for Falling Up. At this point, he's the frontman for Falling Up, The River Empires, and The Gloomcatcher, as well as having been actively involved with A Dream Too Late, and is currently producing the upcoming album for Becoming an Archer. Just thought I'd throw this idea out there, and see if it garners enough support. Maktesh (talk) 05:01, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Jessy Ribordy Page