Talk:Black Orpheus

message: The depiction of Brazil in the film is fairly controversial (and was even at the time of release). Many thought it was candy-coated. I'll try to add a section on this soon - AKeen 03:39, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: :Image:OrfeuNegro.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:OrfeuNegro.jpg

message: As BMK wont discuss this, I'm raising this here. Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Accessibility#Headings clearly states "Do not make pseudo-headings using bold or semicolon markup." Until BMK can show me something that goes against this, the MOS will be applied. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 17:14, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: A "pseudo-heading" using a semi-colon fouls up screen readers because the semi-colon creates a definition out of the text which follows, which is confusing and doesn't searve the article.  One made with bold simply creates a bolded word, which is acceptable, especially when it's followed by a bulleted list.  A bold word followed by a list doesn't confuse the screen-reader, or the "reader" who is listening to it. In this respect, ACCESS, which is a guideline and not mandatory for good reason, is incorrect in advising against the use of bold. BMK (talk) 17:16, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have restored the MOS-complaint, and accessible, headings. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 17:23, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

text: It's quite cleary shown in the fourth table (titled "Pseudo-headings") that using bolding to make a heading is wrong, so it's not acceptable. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 17:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry, do the two concepts: "MOS is not mandatory" and "In this case, MOS is wrong" not mean anything to you?  Are you familiar with WP:IAR? No, don't answer, I understand your motivation entirely, how petty. BMK (talk) 17:25, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

text: Just a note for other editors.  Lugnuts has been banned from my talk page since January 16, 2014, yet persists in trying to "discuss" things there, knowing that I will revert his edits without reading them.  He then uses that against me as he did here, saying "BMK won't discuss this", which is, if nothing else, intellectually dishonest. BMK (talk) 17:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You kept a note of the date?! Well, as long as you don't have any issues. How quaint. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 17:29, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pseudo headings 

message: When you write the controversy section, do your homework on primitivism and post colonial studies.  To say it is "candy coated" is not very scholarly.  First, to what extent was the original playwright from a privileged class rather than a favela dweller?  Then, there is the whole question of a French modernist looking to escape the failure of Western civilization after 2 world wars - how does he shape Brazil into a care-free, sexualized paradise/society (vs. the "remake" which deliberately engaged with the problems of society).  How is slum life framed by the West?  There are scholarly articles on this and many yet to be written. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.240.250.63 (talk • contribs) 04:41, March 30, 2007 (UTC) 
:Can you please provide some references on this - I'd be very interested to read them!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.76.213.205 (talk) 23:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Right now there is no controversy section, though there could be.  I'm certainly aware that the film has been criticized.  The term "candy-coated" comes from another editor's Talk comment in 2006 (above), not from the article,so it doesn't really matter if that is the best term to use or not.  Also, keep in mind that the point of an article is not to do an analysis of the work, but to provide an encyclopedic view of of the work, which may include a summary of important scholarly positions on the article.  To move this forward, it would be helpful to have secondary sources that talk about the film from the perspective you reference.  David.thompson.esq (talk) 22:40, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: <Sigh!> It's truly disappointing that, after all these years, this section has never been written. Barack Obama's intriguing remarks (reported in the "Influence" section) are notable in their own right -- but it would be so much better to present them in the context of the larger controversy. Surely there must be a knowledgable editor out there who could undertake this sorely needed task! Anomalous+0 (talk) 19:10, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primitivism controversy

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Black Orpheus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928000107/http://www.culturevulture.net/Movies/blackorpheus.htm to http://www.culturevulture.net/Movies/blackorpheus.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:48, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Black Orpheus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140709173856/http://playbill.com/news/article/193206-Lynn-Nottage-Will-Pen-Stage-Adaptation-of-Black-Orpheus-George-C-Wolfe-to-Direct to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/193206-Lynn-Nottage-Will-Pen-Stage-Adaptation-of-Black-Orpheus-George-C-Wolfe-to-Direct
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:46, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified