Talk:Eragon (video game)

message: The reason for the cancellation of the GameCube version was pretty obvious...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.160.7.221 (talk) 16:43, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible reason of GameCube version cancellation

message: I'm not the best writer in the world, so could somebody fix it —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.234.4.254 (talk • contribs).
I bought this game because I'm an avid fan of the books. I just want to tell you this is the worst game I have boughten in two years and unfortunatly i must give it 1 out of 5 stars —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.40.241.111 (talk • contribs).
Ha ha ha dumbass of course it was awful it was based on a movie.
71.251.77.125 02:32, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is too much like an advertisement for the game

message: I'm looking at the difference between this article and the Starcraft article, which is featured. Due to the nature of this game, we won't have as much content (yet), as A) this is only a film adaptation and B) it is unlikely to remain as popular as StarCraft.
* The article seems to focus on the PC/main console version with very little on the GameBoy Advance, Nintendo DS and PSP versions. Perhaps we could add an "other versions" section describing the differences between between the versions (and perhaps if they were received by critics in a different manner). I don't own any of the games, so I wouldn't know.
** I've split the Previews and releases into, imaginatively, a Previews and a Releases section. The Releases section deals with the different versions released. UnaLaguna 20:04, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current problems which need sorting out 

message: I removed the following section from the preview section:
:In the videogame, there are some levels with mist. In these levels, Urgals (your enemies) will run blindly through fog and knock Eragon down.
First thing's first: this doesn't belong in the Preview Section. Really, it should belong in the Critical Reception section and requires a source (presumably some game footage would suffice, even if it was made by one of us?). UnaLaguna
: I would suggest a sentence in a more complete Gameplay section describing the game's various situations (standard combat, dragon, misty-bits) would cover it. Sourcing would be another matter, though. Hyperspacey 04:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  AI comment 

message: * Publisher's page about the game, with some key dates (announcement, etc)
* The official game website (possibly worth putting in the external links section >_>)
* Article on the game on Inheriwiki
* Article about the game on The Inheritance Encyclopedia (a lesser-know Inheritance wiki)
* Screenshots from the games on different platforms can be found at Shurgutal.com (console, presumably promotional, Game Boy Advance, probably also promotional, PSP, probably promotional, Gameplay screenshots taken by Shurgutal staff). This article direly needs screenshots of gameplay. What is the state of copyright with these images?
I'll see what I can do with these links, and feel free to add stuff yourself. UnaLaguna Never mind, those images all have watermarks in them, so we can't use them. I'll find another image or, failing that, I'll download the demo and get a screenshot from that. UnaLaguna 07:16, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Found some websites which might be of some use 

message: I'm going through and following the suggestions made by the good people at CVG Peer Review. Of the fourteen points, I've done seven. But those are the seven easy points. UnaLaguna 07:28, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/Eragon (video game)|Peer review]] 

message: I don't know of any sources that really cite such comparisons, and my time with the Eragon video game is very limited, but would it be a fair assessment to suggest that Eragon plays in a similar vein to the Drakengard games? Would this be worth noting in any capacity if the similarities are truly there?--Hailinel 18:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If there are suitable number of similarities and they can be sourced then it's a possibility. But there are other games, such as Drakan: Order of the Flame which have dragon-human gameplay. Unless sourced statements are available, no similarities for any games should be added to the article.UnaLaguna 18:36, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eragon/Drakengard? 

message: Far and few between, I know, but that hasn't stopped Smith Jones trying:
:A more positive and fiarminded review is the one foundhere as well as the other extreme good reviewEragon Game Information page.
#For one thing, the spelling and grammar are incorrect in places.
#Secondly, you're meant to put the external links in the references section using the Cite Web template, not the main body of text.
#A preview and a review are two different things. That's why that Xbox 360 article is so "fiarminded": because they haven't played the game!
#I couldn't find a review from the link you stuck there. And, um, I really wouldn't link to a fansite's review anyway. It's essentially the same as linking to the official page in the Reception section and using the PR drivel they come up with there. A fansite's review doesn't count as a reputable source. They need to be professional and reputable reviewers, as I said on your talk page.
Tell ya what, if anybody finds a positive review (I don't think we need any negative ones), put a link here before adding it to the actual article and we'll see if it's usable. UnaLaguna 06:38, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: okay thank you for your help i didnt know that it was a review and not a preview. Smith Jones 16:22, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

text: i injected clydes links to the article but i need your feed back about on how it does working. Smith Jones 01:20, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely forgot about the handheld versions. Good finds! I tidied up Smith's addition to the article, converting the reference to use the cite web template. I'm not familiar with how the gamerevolution site grades the games, but a C+ still seems pretty mediocre. The 1up link doesn't work properly for me. Nevertheless, the GBA review was an excellent find. UnaLaguna 06:56, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: a C+ grades isnt fvery good but its not a bad review like the bashing "reviews" ma e by the other people. Smith Jones 00:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well if you look for the handheld reviews, you'll find many of good ones. Look for a few, trust me, they're there.--Clyde (talk) 23:13, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Positive "reviews" 

message: I thought this game was coming out on gamecube. Is it just me or have I been falsly lead?68.1.169.148 16:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Read the article, and you'll see it says "A Gamecube version was planned but it was later cancelled." Source:  UnaLaguna 21:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What about gamecube

message: GA On Hold
I have a few concerns with the article, mainly in terms of clarity.
Gameplay
* The gameplay section mentions some Saphira-specific levels but doesn't elaborate. How are these played out? Are they similar to the rest of the game, or do they use seperate mechanics entirely? If they're seperate, this needs to be fully covered. Additionally, multiplayer can probably be mentioned with the rest of the gameplay if it's essentially the same game.
Plot
* No major problems, but there should perhaps be some mention of differences (if any) between the Book, Movie, and Game. (Note: This isn't one of the reasons I'm putting the GA on hold, just a suggestion)
Releases
* The prose here is contradictory. The Releases section mentions "With the exception of the Xbox 360, the console and PC versions of the game are very similar, focusing on the same mechanics", then later mentions that the XBox 360 version has two extra levels and an extra foe. Which is it? Is the XBox 360 different from a gameplay perspective, or is it just the same Eragon game with a couple extras? 
* The Handhelds (for PSP and DS) can be excised entirely, as unless they're ports of the same game they should be handled in seperate articles.
* Needs a bit of copyediting. Nothing major, but items like "On December 6th 2006 a free downloadable preview of the guide was made available for download from the Sierra webpage" shouldn't repeat the same thing. It could be trimmed down to "On December 6th 2006 a free downloadable preview of the guide was made available for download from the Sierra webpage."
Aside from these items, this is a pretty solid article. Cheers, Lankybugger ○ speak ○ see ○ 20:04, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, and one more thing. Like the Plot item I mentioned this won't hold you back from GA-class, but you might want to find a brighter screenshot for the article, such as this. The current one is very difficult to make out, even at it's native resolution. Cheers, Lankybugger ○ speak ○ see ○ 20:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll get on it ASAP UnaLaguna 20:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made a few edits, and I think I've covered most of the points you mentioned. UnaLaguna 20:40, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  This now meets GA-class standards. You might wish to revisit the items I've not struck through in the future, but the article as-is looks fine. Good work! Cheers, Lankybugger ○ speak ○ see ○ 22:57, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEES!!!!!!! Life is good :) UnaLaguna 05:31, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA On Hold

message: I don't own the console games, so I can't contribute about them, but the article (except for the 'Response' section) doesn't mention the handheld version. Huh? It's a good game, and supposedly the one to get the better review of the two. 
* One interesting feature is (on the world map, she will not go into towns due to fear of being seen) that Saphira actually fights alongside Eragon in battle. 
* Another is that you get a tutorial in which you control Arya, Faolin, and Glenwing, where they teach you (using the high-level elves) how to fight and play the game.
* There's also a section before when Saphira hatches where, in addition to Eragon, Roran and Katrina are in your party.
* There are 'ruins' where you can walk up to these 'ruins' on the world map, and press A to fight a tough battle. In exchange, if you win, you get items superior to those simply found in treasure chests or dropped by enemies. In this game, Yazuac is such a ruin - Eragon instead learns how to use magic during an Urgal ambush outside town on the World Map.
* Most towns are simply places to forge, rest, and make potions. Only the story-important ones have interiors.
* Characters can choose their focus in an ability, so that they can learn special skills. Hunting is strength and combos with the bow in addition to tracking ability, Weapons is strength and combos with swords, etc. in addition to getting the right to fight tough opponents in town, Herbal allows you to pick herbs and make potions, and Magic... is, well, Magic. P.S. Endurance allows you to lift crates.
I know this sounds like an ad, but my point is that this is a unique game, and with gameplay utterly different from the console versions. So can it PLEASE be included? 169.229.121.94 03:15, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I own none of the Eragon games, but I can tell you that there isn't one handheld game, as your commentary suggests. Read the article and you'll see that there are different versions for the various handhelds (I took that information straight from the developer's website). Also, read the comments relating to the GA on hold. You'll see there that in-depth descriptions of the handheld versions don't belong in this article as they are significantly different from the others. So in answer to your question, no it can't be included in the Eragon (video game) article, but yes it can be included in Wikipedia, providing you can find reliable sources to back it up.UnaLaguna 06:51, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHAT ABOUT THE HANDHELD?!

message: :Image:Eragon-PC-Screenshot.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:54, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Eragon-PC-Screenshot.jpg

message: "They face Durza a second time" it doesn't say that they face him a first time, please add this in in the correct place.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.194.245.224 (talk) 01:29, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paragraph 9 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Eragon (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070226211205/http://www.amazeentertainment.com/ to http://www.amazeentertainment.com/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930182544/http://www.xbox.com/en-IE/community/news/leipzig/eragon.htm to http://www.xbox.com/en-IE/community/news/leipzig/eragon.htm
*Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20061117222318/http://www.eragongame.com/ to http://www.eragongame.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:19, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified