lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Shadowboxing (2005 film)

message: A couple notes about the recent edit:
*Could you clarify what "refuses to accept the fight's scenario" means?  
*This one also needs clarification: "The police are told to hunt Artem unofficially, however, it has no instructions and the policemen do not know why they must watch him." I added the "are told to" part because if I understand right, someone is giving them these instructions.
*What are encashers? Is this Cashiers? Sounds like maybe "mafioso" or "thug" from the context.
delldot talk 18:37, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification 

message: *Valiyev was offered to stage the fight according to some scenario. He refuses to do that, he wanted Artem to win.
*Encashers? Well, this word does not exist. I produced it from encashement, though I knew it did not exist in English. But I forgot this. It is a mistake. I should have used collectors or receivers. The original word (sg.) is "inkassator" (). Inkassators carry money and such. Also, I am not sure about the word "bankomat".
A. Demidov (talk) 19:49, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanations 

message: I usually do not make so many errors. Probably, I was really tired up. Often, I can even fix someone else's errors like those of mine. But Delldot has literally saved me from the hard work. Thanks!
A. Demidov (talk) 16:39, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Many thanks to Delldot!
Talk:Sara Davis Buechner

message: I just reverted a copyright violation from Musicians Guide, which carries the copyright notice "Copyright © 2007 Net Industries - All Rights Reserved", and therefore is not able to be copied here.  There was also some cited facts removed, and the subsequent removal of a category to which this person correctly belongs. — Wwagner 04:36, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 

message: This article needs a serious overhaul and updating. The BLP is notable for inclusion for both a career under the name: David Beucher and Sara Davis Buechner. Deadnames aside, sources that back content claims (competitions, education, etc) associated with this time period must be included in this article for verification. Present day bios or artist profiles directly associated with the BLP are not allowed. Likewise, articles such as NYTIMES, Philadelphia Inquirer, Canton Rep, NYTIMES Magazine, Arkansas Online, xtra magazine, et al need to be included to better represent the BLPs transition and how that incorporates into their career, life and education within the LGBT community. Finally, articles that highlight, review, detail the BLP's present day concert career: OUT CLIQUE, NY Concert Review, NYTIMES Review, etc need to be included. I've removed links that are WP:PRIMARY or deadlink. It doesn't leave much. This BLP deserves a better article than this. IMHO. Maineartists (talk) 04:01, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: Buechner was not “assigned male at birth.”  Buechner was born a male and, as a matter of biology, remains one.  The term “assigned” as used here is not only irrational and misleading, but deeply offensive. 108.48.37.28 (talk) 15:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The term "assigned" is the best way to handle this at WP. To say one is "born" male / female they first have to be "observed" and then "assigned" by a midwife, nurse, physician, or other medical professional. Otherwise, we wouldn't be able to say "Buechner was born a male". There would be no record of it. There is no malice or intent to offend when using the term "assigned". Perception may be individual and personal to each reader, but WP must remain neutral in its writing. See WP Sex assignment. Maineartists (talk) 16:19, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Assigned?”
Talk:Florida Trail

message: I am organizing an effort for a major expansion of this article.  If you wish to participate, please leave me a note. Carl M. Anglesea (talk) 21:22, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Expansion plans 

message: I think Philoserf the High rating should only be given for especially significant routes, for the US a trail like the Appalachian trail, say. and in Canada the Trans Canada Trail. Also the England Coast Path. Otherwise Mid importance seems sufficient. The guidelines aren't emphatic and anyhow should be modified.  Rwood128 (talk) 21:02, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Each National Scenic Trail, or other nations equivalent, has a place in some backpackers heart. Rather than use judgement case-by-case, perhaps on trail systems the editorial teams are not informed about, I like a clearer in or not criteria. At least until the editorial team can build an understanding that isn't gut feeling. —¿philoserf? (talk) 22:17, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: My concern is pragmatic. If this Project aims to improve articles relating to backpacking doesn't there  have to be a limit the number of possible high (and possibly mid) rated articles? Should all National Trails, the French GR, and European E networks, and so forth be rated high? If the Florida Trail article is high shouldn't I raise the rating for East Coast Trail from the Low, that I gave it, to high? It has a place in some many backpackers hearts. To be a little cheeky (sorry). Rwood128 (talk) 23:23, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Your judgement is as good, or bad, as mine. I trust you. Go for it. We can deal with the any real differences as they arise. —¿philoserf? (talk) 23:32, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating
Talk:Euphoria (2006 film)

message: Yo, any idea where one can find a non-Russian (tran)script (or subtitles) of the film? --91.141.114.153 (talk) 23:50, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Script/Transcript 
Talk:Cecilienhof

message: Any thoughts on whether there should be more here on the substance of the conference? Or should we keep it short and focussed on the location itself?
Also, do we need a gallery? There are a number of additional pictures on the German WP page.
Drow69 (talk) 21:51, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major reworking 

message: 'Crown Prince Wilhelm was so impressed with cottage and Tudor style homes like Bidston Court in Birkenhead (England) that Cecilienhof was inspired by it.' There is no mention of Bidston Court, or any specific building in the UK in the German wikipedia entry: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cecilienhof and neither of the references cited for this 'fact' appear to be reliable sources. Can anyone find a reliable source confirming this? Robert P Connolly (talk) 14:43, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Inspired by Bidston Court'
Talk:The Castle (1994 film)

message: What makes this the first notable screen version? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:27, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  First notable
Talk:The Sword Bearer

message: I just saw this film, and I must say that the content of this page is rather poor and misleading. I'm suggesting a redo of this page, I would correct it myself, but I don't have any sources on it. :) 
Asarolt (talk) 22:33, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of substance
Talk:Playing the Victim (film)

message: I just rewrote the whole article.  I will be resubmitting it it wikiproject films for a better rating. --Miagirljmw14 Miagirljmw~talk 20:23, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Upgraded to Start-class. B-class is rather far away at the moment, requiring much broader coverage. An image would be really nice too. decltype (talk) 03:51, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Image added, updated improvement checklist decltype (talk) 05:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Prisoner of the Mountains

message: As it stands, the only clear evidence that this is not a 19th century period piece (as its status as an adaptation of a Tolstoy story would suggest) is one mention of "flying" and the image.  Perhaps it should be clarified that this is a modernization of the Tolstoy... john k (talk) 14:40, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Time period

message: Does the plot need to include the ending of this movie? For those who may have not seen it, the write-up gives it away. The27thmaine (talk) 02:42, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: I'm sure that the film is an adaptation of a Pushkin play.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.144.233.230 (talk) 19:59, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The story line of Pushkin's 1822 writing is about a Russian nobleman taken captive by the Circassians (Caucasians), and of a young local girl that falls in love with him and later lets him go. Tolstoy's version also had one Russian prisoner, didn't it (unlike the movie's two captured soldiers)? I read the latter one a couple of years ago, but I'm not remembering it. Does it also have a "young girl" plot? I need to find a copy of Pushkin's - searching googlebooks at the moment, but not finding full version yet. The27thmaine (talk) 21:54, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tolstoj? [[Aleksandr Sergeevich Pushkin]]
Talk:Ground loop (aviation)

message: Peharps it could be improved by explaining how ground loop occurs under control and how to recover incipent ones. Thanks En51cm 18:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request 

message: "Ground loops occur when the aircraft is moving on the ground..."
Can a ground loop occur when the plane is NOT moving? Sudden high engine torque while parked, for example. Binksternet 20:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: While not moving?
Talk:Novi Zrin

message: This article raises several questions and problems. Firstly, the ruins of Novi Zrin are not situated in Croatia but in Hungary, near the villages of Belezna and Őrtilos. There were excavations carried out by Hungarian archeologists (http://index.hu/tudomany/tortenelem/zrinyi060714/) during the last year and the year before last. And according to the rules of Wikipedia the Hungarian name: "Zrínyi-újvár" or "Zrínyiújvár" should be used instead of the Croatian one. (For the correct spelling see the Hungarian version of the Novi Zrin article) --Sgn (talk) 16:44, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Entergy Tower

message: Added coordinates as per google maps D.c.camero (talk) 02:13, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 
Template talk:WikiProject Media

message: I have reverted the picture to a smaller size, as the picture is just decoration for the template, and takes up a too larger space on any talk page it is added to. The example that was quoted is only 100px horizontally, and also has the additional grading system. Bob talk 20:12, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good. Chongkian (talk) 09:10, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Size of picture

message: The image chosen for this template is altogether unsuitable. It is impossible to see what it's supposed to present. __meco (talk) 14:02, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Replaced with diff. picture, at least you can see it better. If anyone has an even better pict., please update it! Thanks. --Funandtrvl (talk) 00:24, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsuitable picture
Talk:Dead Man's Bluff

message: The English (US) title is given as "Blind Man's Bluff", not "Dead Man's Bluff". Please leave the categories sorted by the Russian title, unless the article is moved. Hoverfish Talk 17:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Now it's much closer to the thing 178.70.77.52 (talk) 14:16, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrected the plot section to better correspond to the actual movie
Talk:Voina

message: they are out of prison now, on bail paid by Banksy.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.118.158.242 (talk) 12:11, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Need update

message: I was trying to get information on the "Pussy Riot" as I see this name everywhere on the news. I therefore had a look at their wikipedia page, and then looked at information on "Voina" as I wanted to learn more about feminism in Russia. I was very shocked when consulting external links to end up on pages containing purely pornographic content, without having seen any warning message. I can totally admit that these links illustrate the group's activity, but I think a disclaimer containing a "Not Safe For Work", "Adult Only" or "Pornographic Content" is definitely essential in order to warn users under 18, or simply people who doesn't want to see that kind of images/videos. I edited the article to give a chance to people to avoid ending up facing explicit images without a warning. --SauterelleVerte (talk) 07:03, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated

message: My recent edit of today more accuarately conforms to cited article. "Money was seen as the lubricant of a system they despised. They flatly rejected its use and made the lifting of food and drink from supermarkets, guess what: a form of art." 
Pre-edit the article suggested that there was an official collective policy of shoplifting to meet day to day needs, which is not the same thing as an artistic vision of such thefts, which has a long tradition in anarchist thinking and which may occur only sporadically and with a certain degree of fanfare. It may be narcissistic, wrong and self-fulfilling, but such an act conceived as an "art form" is a different matter than such an act as part of a daily routine. The original article is somewhat ambigous, it could mean it either way, so it is best to quote the article to avoid taking a POV. Devilishlyhandsome (talk) 22:42, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversial topic stick to specifics please 

message: I don't think so... http://free-voina.org/provocateurs
Petya pidarok = "Pete the faggot"
And there's nothing remotely feminist about the museum stunt or the chicken stunt. http://radicalhub.com/2012/08/20/pussy-riot-whose-freedom-whose-riot/ MaxBrowne (talk) 00:00, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pro-LGBT?
Talk:They Chose Freedom

message: Hi! I'm curious if there was any reporting on this demonstation and the subsequent trial in the official Soviet press. If you find some info, please put it in the article. M.efimov (talk) 17:57, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Tuner

message: The DVD cover shows the lion logo from the Venice Film Festival but the article does not mention Venice. Varlaam (talk) 09:44, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venice
Talk:The Roosevelt New Orleans

message: In light of confirmation  of the return to the historic name, thoughts on moving this article to "Roosevelt Hotel, New Orleans"? -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:51, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name move

message: Why was this moved to the title "The Roosevelt New Orleans Hotel"? The website describes it as "The Roosevelt New Orleans". Wondering, Infrogmation (talk) 00:16, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Move March 2011

message: Representatives of the hotel are now editing this page. Any questions regarding sources or information can be directed to the Marketing Manager of the hotel.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Russbergeron (talk • contribs) 20:00, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Move and Updates to the Page 

message: Photo :File:LOBBY PHOTO.JPG is currently listed for deletion discussion as lacking license permission; discussion at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:LOBBY_PHOTO.JPG    -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:39, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: File:LOBBY PHOTO.JPG
Talk:Netcentric warfare

message: Difference between network centric and netcentric is still ill-defined. Is netcentric simply "network centric" or "network centered", and what are the implications of this as a warfare doctrine? Should this page simply be a redirect to NCW? I put it into the Doctrine category. Pknicker 16:18, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it is different enough to merit its own page.  I recommend we merge this into the larger article.  ComputerGeezer (talk) 18:15, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: How is Netcentric different from NCW
Talk:Koelnmesse

message: I'm from cologne and i know that 7 world fairs are taking palce here. Plz sb research it...--81.173.150.88 (talk) 21:20, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Husband of His Wife

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 21:11, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag
Talk:Turmbergbahn

message: That accident sounds like a fake. The references make no sense and the name of the award sounds incorrect in german.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.110.67.35 (talk) 09:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I immediately thought the same. The name of the award is not only incorrect but plain nonsense. Plus, you don't receive awards for your heroic deeds just two days later. I checked a couple of websites where reports about an accident of this kind would have appeared but could not find any traces there. --84.128.181.196 (talk) 01:39, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maintanance accident 

message: This article was renamed by User:Rex Germanus from Turmbergbahn to Turmberg Funicular with the comment English Wikipedia.
I have reverted this move, on the grounds that Turmbergbahn is a proper name. If there was clear evidence that there was a commonly accepted English variant of the name, then it would be perfectly correct to use that in the English Wikipedia rather than the German variant. An example of this would be to use Rhine rather than Rhein, as Rhine is the common English name for that river. However a search using Google (on English language pages only) shows no hits for the exact name Turmberg Funicular; although there is one hit on Turmbergbahn Funicular. There are 140 hits on Turmbergbahn. So I think it is clear that Turmberg Funicular is not in common English usage.
So the question then is, should we invent new names for things that look more English, just because this is the English Wikipedia. I'd say not. -- Chris j wood 20:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also note that the rename was made without any attempt to adjust the article in line with the new name. I'm cool if you still feel that the article should be renamed, but please do the whole job. -- Chris j wood 20:26, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible rename to Turmberg Funicular 

message: I included a sentences about plans to extend the line to the foot of the hill. Those plans are not new however and date back to the early 20th century. After the first World War those plans where never picked up again, but do explain the rather unusual width of the street (Bergbahnstraße) that leads up to today’s valley station.--Catflap08 (talk) 08:15, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extension of the funicular railway
Talk:Kayleigh Crowe

message: I have placed merger tags on a number of character articles. Rather than repeat the reasoning on each talk page I have set out the full argument here. Please feel free to leave comments either on this talk page or at the WikiProject. I want to try and start a debate about the whole way in which Emmerdale information is provided on Wikipedia --Amxitsa 20:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merger
Talk:Leineschloss

message: Whilst the RAF did carry out serveral raids against Hanover, this  German Wikipedia article suggests that the palace was in fact destroyed following a daytime raid by the USAAF on 26 July 1943:
:Bei einem ersten Tagesangriff durch die 8. US-Luftflotte in den Mittagsstunden wurden große Teile des Stadtzentrums zerstört – Marktkirche, Altes Rathaus, Hauptbahnhof, Opernhaus und Leineschloss waren getroffen und brannten teils völlig aus. Alte Markthalle und Café Kröpcke wurden völlig zerstört. 273 Menschen kamen ums Leben; 4000 Menschen wurden obdachlos. 
:(During one of the first daytime raids by the US 8th Air Force in the afternoon [of 26 July], large parts of the town centre were destroyed - the Market Church, Old Town Hall, main railway station, Opera House and Leine Palace were hit and completely burnt out. The Old Market Hall and the Café Kröpcke were totally destroyed. 273 people were killed, and 4000 were made homeless.)
Neither description is sourced, so I don't know which version is correct, but it needs to be clarified and one article or the other changed accordingly.
Petecollier (talk) 21:36, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Destruction during WWII
Talk:Tear Ring Saga

message: Sources for a rewrite:
* http://www.ign.com/articles/2001/07/25/nintendo-sues-over-emblem-copyright
* http://www.hardcoregaming101.net/fireemblem/fireemblem6.htm
* http://www.ign.com/games/tearring-saga/ps-749808
* http://www.ign.com/articles/2001/03/09/emblem-saga-trailer-movie-available
* http://www.rpgamer.com/games/other/psx/emblemsaga/emblemsaga.html
* http://www.rpgamer.com/news/Q4-2000/122800c.html
* http://www.rpgamer.com/news/Q1-2001/020701b.html
* http://www.rpgamer.com/news/Q3-2001/072501a.html
* http://www.gamespot.com/articles/emblem-saga-receives-name-change/1100-2705286/
* http://www.kotaku.com.au/2014/11/ten-things-you-might-not-know-about-fire-emblem/ Sergecross73 msg me 17:12, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: * http://www.nintendolife.com/news/2015/06/matters_of_import_fire_emblem_sort_of_exists_on_the_sony_playstation 
While I can't help but notice that they decided to do a retrospective just a little after I've completely rewritten the article (and cover most of the same points), but it can still offer some new info to the article, mostly reception-related content. Sergecross73 msg me 15:19, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  NintendoLife Retrospective
Talk:Ungulani Ba Ka Khosa

message: Francisco Esau cossa 197.218.108.230 (talk) 10:48, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Francisco Esau cossa
Talk:Happy's Place

message: This will be a hard page to source. You would have to contact WFFT in Fort Wayne.
Mrobinson587 20:23, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 0

message: Happy has a face book now. I don't know enough about wiki to add stuff and make it look good. There's lots of good info tidbits. It's the facebook of the ORIGINAL Happy as well. ANd no, Steve Shine was never Froggy. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Happy-The-Hobo/44222841445   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanetaker5566 (talk • contribs) 23:46, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: .
Talk:Len Rix

message: i 2600:6C40:1900:5DB4:854C:9F64:D42:901B (talk) 21:32, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please call me any time very very important
Talk:Frédéric Bruly Bouabré

message: I could not find a reliable source that could serve as an evidence that March 11 is really his birthday. Does anyone know more? 80.71.142.166 (talk) 19:41, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthday: any source?
Talk:The Granstream Saga

message: I've removed this from the opening paragraph: "It debuted at number one on the Japanese charts, bumping Final Fantasy VII out of its place, but then fell into obscurity."
This seemed unlikely to me considering FF VII released 10 months before, so I went and found the charts.  Here's the week before Granstream Saga.  The "International" rerelease of Final Fantasy VII is there, but at #18.  Here's the week of Granstream Saga's release.  Granstream Saga is the #4 ranked game for the week, though it is the highest PlayStation game.
Perhaps the original claim is from some more specific listing or non-Famitsu tracker, but if added back it should be sourced. --JoshuaJSlone (talk) 18:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: #1 Debut?

message: i might be able to write it though with information taken from the manual.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.86.142 (talk) 12:50, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article needs a character section
Talk:Youssouf Bakayoko

message: 1. Date
I have him taking office in 2005 (http://www.afdevinfo.com/htmlreports/org/org_14480.html), can anyone confirm the date stated here instead?
Archphil (talk) 11:38, 18 October 2010 (UTC)