Talk:Southern Bug

message: Although I see why Western Bug was kept with the -G, I still cannot understand why the southern Bug was added an -H. Yes its very right to put a note not to cofuse the two rivers, but there should be some consistency in the naming, to not further confuse the two, although I am not sure myself to be honest. On one hand Bug, like Kiev is much more common in English, on the other hand the Buh helps to add to the differencese yet takes away consistency. I say call a vote, and make sure majority of voters are English editors not Maidan ones.Kuban kazak 23:14, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked a little bit too. Most press uses Buh in the last two years if uses it at all, since Ukraine is rather an obscure place in the world news. Also, Britanncia's article is also called Southern Buh. So, I think we can keep a new name  but that's just my opinion. I don't feel too hot about this and here at least both names make sense unlike some other moves and name changes done by the user you have in mind. --Irpen 23:17, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Buh or Bug

message: I was bold and moved it to "Southern Bug". It's far more common name in English and the policy is clear about this.
Google Books:
*Books 1 - 10 with 258 pages on "Southern Bug".
*Books 1 - 6 with 6 pages on "Southern Buh"
10:12, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved to [[Southern Bug]] 

message: Per Britannica, and lack of notability, I would like to revert this unannounced/undiscussed move back to Southern Buh. The following Google searches show neither a significant amount of use in English language, nor a large degree of difference between Bug and Buh. The move too bold.
*"Southern Buh" river -wikipedia—728 English-language pages
*"Southern Bug" river -wikipedia—942 English-language pages
*"Southern Bug" river-173 English-language books
*"Southern Buh" river-11 English-language books
--tufkaa 01:16, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Too bold

message: Ladies and gentlemen, I've never been good with images placing. In small articles, I just resort to galleries which is a degenerative solution since pics taken apart from the text are not really "illustrations" Somebody please take them neatly in relevant secs while I learn. Ukrained2012 (talk) 18:54, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In my opinion the article suffers mainly from way too many images to support the prose. Placing them alongside the text will be impossible for this amount of text without severely overillustrating it. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 19:16, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout help needed 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
----
Procedural close. An undiscussed page move to Southern Buh has been administratively reverted. Editors may begin a new RM at any time to discuss a rename to a new title. Thanks and kudos to editors for your input; everyone stay healthy! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'r there 04:28, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Southern Buh →  – Common name. The Google Ngram viewer shown here [] indicates "Southern Bug" being used more than "Southern Buh". Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 14:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 October 2022