Talk:Pro-democracy camp (Hong Kong)

message: The term "pan-democracy camp" is long out of date, and as the article notes, when it is used, it tends to be used pejoratively. As a Google search will show, the term "pan-democrats" has been the standard description in both media and across party lines for years now, so how about changing the title to reflect actual usage? 
Thinginblack (talk) 08:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Time to change the title?

message: I went through and rewrote almost the entire article, removing run-on sentences, adding context to poorly-defined statements, removing local jargon, adding basic definitions for those who are unfamiliar with the subject as a whole, removed unnecessary redundant phrasing, removed multiples of repeated nouns/verbs and replaced them with synonyms. Please let me know what you think. It's my goal that china-related articles like this one (typically written in mandarin or standardized chinese and then translated to english) will be more readable for first-language fluent english speakers like myself, and make the affairs of the chinese people more interesting and accessable to english readers. Cheers! Dragonnas (talk) 18:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: fixed Poor English Translation

message: The image :Image:Civic party.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:03, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Civic party.svg

message: I found plenty of original research materials without references in this article. Too bad. STSC (talk) 10:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  O.R. 

message: As the Yellow ribbon colour represents the Pro-democracy camp, can use the yellow colour?Marxistfounder (talk) 08:57, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yellow ribbon colour 

message: *From Chinese Wikipedia discussion :zh:Talk:民主派 (香港), Yan Kai-wing (甄啟榮) defines himself as an independent democrat facebook profile of 甄啟榮, and judging from his recent announcements 香港獨立媒體網——深水埗「關鍵一席」 甄啟榮：曾加入建制派是遺憾一生, he can be regarded as a member of Pro-democracy camp (Hong Kong). Should we count him in 2019 Hong Kong local elections, and say that Pro-democracy camp won 389 seats? UU (talk) 05:37, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Use secondary source, summarized what RS say. If RS did not have the same conclusion, may be marked as a footnote . There are way many people at their primary source claimed as independent / democrat  but secondary RS interpreted their actions as Pro=Beijing. Matthew hk (talk) 07:56, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: (no title)

message: The Chinese version of this article has it, should we also put it here?
--Hkfreedomfighter (talk) 16:34, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Pro-Dem election committee seats? 

message: A couple of editors recently have added it to the infobox without any prior discussion and have repeatedly re-added it when I've removed it, should it be kept in the infobox or should it be removed? Lmmnhn you seem like an expert at this, could u mind giving ur opinion? Thx. Hkfreedomfighter (talk) 18:04, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we keep CPPCC and ExCo? 

message: In the "2020 resignation en masse" section, "as they deemed as unlawful" is missing what it was, they deemed unlawful.
--Damunik (talk) 10:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing word