lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:String Quintet, Op. 104 (Beethoven)

message: Reverting my inclusion of the reference to "An Equal Music" by Vikram Seth seems more than a little strange. No serious justification for the reversion was given. The description of the novel as "pop culture" is incorrect and given without any argument. Even were it possible to construct a reasoned argument for designating the novel as "pop culture", the prohibition against such an inclusion does not seem reasonable. I have not yet reverted the reversion by DavidRF but it certainly seems a perfectly reasonable thing to do. Why should the page on the novel include a reference to the Beethoven quintet but the page on the quintet not be permitted a reference to the novel? A link in both places, to the other, makes more sense. --Mark R. Diamond
I've removed: "The quintet features prominently in 'An Equal Music', the novel by Vikram Seth." from this article - this really has no place here, especially in the main discussion - it would, of course, be very necessary in a page on Vikram Seth.   The reference here is spurious at best. HammerFilmFan (talk) 22:38, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Appearance in [[An Equal Music]] by [[Vikram Seth]]

message: If Vikram Seth's introduction to the concept album for "An Equal Music" is to be believed this Quintet was not well known for much of the 20th C. The relevant text is:
It gives me particular pleasure to introduce one piece of music to listeners. Several readers, including some musicians have written to me after reading An Equal Music, asking whether Beethoven's String Quintet in C minor, Op. 104 really exists - as if I would have had the gall to invent not merely a fictive work but an opus number as well! It is an obscure work, but it does indeed exist...
Seth, Vikram, "A Note From The Author", Vikram Seth, An Equal Music:Music from the Best Selling Novel, DECCA, 2000, p.7
The notes on the back of the CD claim that the recording of the Op. 104 Quintet made for the album was the first recording made for CD.
This might be a worthwhile aspect of the Quintet to study and add to the article.
Graham1973 (talk) 02:03, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noteablity of this composition prior to "An Equal Music"
Talk:Woolwich Ferry

message: I have reverted changes by 82.132.246.234 because no sources were given for this change and I can find no evidence of it anywhere.
If this change was genuine please respond here with some suggested sources. Martin Hogbin (talk) 12:29, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of operator 

message: As part of t he GA review, I revised the map to show the DLR extension from King George V to Woolwich Arsenal (and added same image to Woolwich foot tunnel, replacing the non-free image there). If you wonder why it isn't there, you probably need to bypass your cache. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:18, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  New map 

message: The history section claims that the ferry became Roll on, Roll off in 1963! So what was it before, all vehicles craned aboard? It was always roll on roll off, but was side loading. The 1963 ferries were designed for end loading but used side loading until the new terminals with link spans opened in 1966. It was at this point that the ferry became accessible to HGVs. Ambak51 (talk) 17:03, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Roll on, Roll off"
Talk:Big Eight

message: Which German TV stations fall under the Big 8? --88.77.247.110 (talk) 11:55, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  German TV 

message: No mention of the Big 8 accounting firms?  That was a phrase in use for over 50 years! 98.248.180.183 (talk) 04:34, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big 8 Accounting Firms
Talk:Big Seven

message: I went to a bit of trouble to include the Big Seven 1920s battleships, and someone with even more spare time than me promptly reverted it with the sniffy little note, "For god's sake, please do away with those anime memes or at least try to provide a reliable source." What the hell are you on about, anime memes?  It was part of the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty.  FFS, does no one go to school any more?
Zgryphon (talk) 04:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  I seem to have angered the Culture Police
Talk:Big Six

message: This page could do with a purge, (as per Big Four; see talk there). Any thoughts? Moonraker12 (talk) 14:56, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup? 

message: I think that this article should point out that in my country (the United Kingdom) the term "Big Six" would most commonly refer to the "Big Six" supermarkets  - these are Asda, Morrisons, Tesco, the Co-op, Sainsburys and 
Waitrose. 15:03, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Big Six supermarkets

message: M30 engine by BMW was called BIG SIX. Especially M30B35.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.53.75.96 (talk) 21:07, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  BMW BIG SIX
Talk:The Night the Animals Talked

message: This is very likely to be untrue. Corporate intellectual property doesn't usually become public domain because the copyright holder goes under. If this is the case here, great - but support is needed. Merenta 03:17, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Adding "likely" into the above quote, as the author has done, just adds a weasel word, and I have tagged the article as such. On a related note, it's really not likely at all; when corporations go under, their property doesn't just disappear - somebody still owns it. They have corporate successors or else their property (including copyrights) get sold. If that's not the case here, great - but we still need cites, not weasel words. Cheerio and happy editing. Merenta 19:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I reworded the section involving copyright and the public domain, as the previous editor (perhaps unintentionally) linked bootleg copies and public domain status in an incorrect way. The only real linkage between these things is that it's not really possible to have a bootleg copy of a public domain work - or if so, it's not in the usual sense that one means "bootleg". I changed the copyright text to read that the copyright status is uncertain, which seems to be the case. I'm standing by my assessment that this work is not in the public domain, but I have been unable to find sources to support my position. Cheerio and happy editing! Merenta (talk) 16:08, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "With the demise of Gamma Films, the film has passed into the public domain."
Talk:Bonding jumper

message: Someone suggested merging "Bonding jumper" with the Electrical conduit article.
===In favour of the proposed merger===
*1.
*2.
*3.
===Oppose===
*1. Someone suggested merging "bonding jumper" with this article.  Oppose - a jumper is not a conduit and has uses other than a conduit system. --Wtshymanski (talk) 03:42, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: *1. Someone suggested merging "bonding jumper" with this article.  Oppose - a jumper is not a conduit and has uses other than a conduit system. --Wtshymanski (talk) 03:42, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Oppose
Talk:Orly Air Base

message: Added the little-known World War I history of Orly Bwmoll3 (talk) 21:26, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Major rewrite and expansion

message: Why is this here? The correct name would seem to be either "Paris-Orly Air Base" or "Orly Air Base" both of which are now redirects here. So I think a move is in order. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 15:22, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: THanks. I wan't sure if there was some really good reason for it being at the other title. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:53, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: 10 citations doesn't seem enough for an article of this size. I also think we need more info about the airfield itself.Feitlebaum (talk) 16:23, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs more citations
Talk:New Indian Ridge Museum

message: #Include what specific organizations have recognized it
#Cite the decade of the most recent artifacts
#Discuss what areas the Col. Researched
#Since when has Matt operated the museum? (Lised on page. Opened in 2000. Feel free to double check but I am pretty sure it is there)
#People who contribute to the NIRM
Just did some editing and I hope you like it.
Toadwildride 03:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes that should be made to increase the quality of the article

message: Is that apparent misspelling an accurate quotation of an unusual motto, or just a goof? I am reluctant to change anything within a quotation. Chris the speller (talk) 05:54, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perserving 

message: The entry needs revision beyond the copyedit I just completed as follows:
- there is a good bit of extraneous material in the article not relevant to the museum.
- I deleted several of these extraneous details that also had no citation but appear to be the author's opinion.
- I am not certain if this venue can actually be called a museum as it is not open to the public.  See ICOM museum definition  as of August 24, 2007: “A museum is a non-profit, permanent institution in the service of society and its development, open to the public, which acquires, conserves, researches, communicates and exhibits the tangible and intangible heritage of humanity and its environment for the purposes of education, study and enjoyment.”
- in reviewing the museum website, there is considerably more that could be noted to summarize their collections.  However, the article focuses more on the individuals involved in founding the museum than the actual museum. Robertnola (talk) 20:08, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need considerable citations and reworking of content 

message: In tracking down citations, I note that the format given is not complete.  Suggest reviewing all. Robertnola (talk) 20:26, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation format
Talk:Saad Attiya

message: I was not aware of the process to not update a page after the copyright notice was placed... so my error. I did attempt to fix the page after talking with user:the evil spartan. I agree that the initial content was just a paste from another site. However, I have enriched and rewritten it substantially.  I'm not a lawyer, but I believe it it is perfectly permissible to have substantially similar content as long as it is not identical or largely identical.
I have also enriched the content, added new information and sources.  That's all I have to offer at this time. I think the page is worth keeping and no longer at risk of violating the copyright standards, but then I'm new here, so I won't be the one to judge. --Pearrari 03:50, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It actually isn't as bad as I originally thought; I happened to keyword search just the right words. You will notice that the current text still has certain phrases: At the age of 16; coach Hamad gave him a place in the first team and Saad Attiya [was/is] the youngest member of Iraq’s successful Olympic team. Just a little more would probably be good; sorry for the hassle. The Evil Spartan 04:02, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible copyright infringement
Talk:Jeffrey Overstreet

message: Removed all possible alleged copywritten material. Proper citations are also used for remaining material. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Djhofrich (talk • contribs) 
:Looks much better, thanks for your contribution. The Evil Spartan 04:04, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:RAFVR (T)

message: This page uses content from Air Cadet Central. The original content was at RAF VR(T) and is available under the GNU Free Documentation License. The list of authors can be seen in the page history.
The link above states "All pages on this site ©1999-2007 Air Cadet Central, All Right Reserved." This appears to be a copyright infringement. Greenshed (talk) 22:19, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
File talk:SeattleI5Skyline.jpg

message: Where's the Space Needle?! Madcoverboy 20:16, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Behind the buildings. This shot is taken from south of downtown and the space needle is north of downtown.  Actually it is quite far away from the downtown core.  The photos of the space needle are generally taken from Queen Anne hill, which is close to the space needle and far away from the downtown buildings and therefore makes it look bigger than it actually is.  Cacophony 22:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Agricola (board game)

message: Scott and his friends are sitting in the lab playing Agricola in season 3 episode 7, "Community of Dreadful Fear and Hate". Later in the episode, the game is used as a diversion to trick Delphine. Davogotland (talk) 15:49, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphan Black 

message: The game received many awards, but also criticism:
Instructions make no sense, so as to require unofficial guides ('Your best bet is to find someone who knows how to play and have them teach you, because the instructions are beyond useless') 
Euro-games are inherently single-player and should ditch the social component altogether ('having extra people doesn' t add much fun'). 
I think a balanced Reception section would make the article more encompassing. Will give it a try if I get time this weekend.
JudgeGregg (talk) 10:39, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: I think this article in its current state deserves better than a C. In my opinion, it now fulfills at least the B-class criteria and maybe even higher. So I guess the time would be right to reevaluate it. Need another person to do the reassessment, apparently. JudgeGregg (talk) 18:39, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update article class? 
Talk:Blacker (security)

message: I was adding references when it was marked for speedy deletion.  Let me know if it still does not qualify as a stub. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cjcollier (talk • contribs) 05:16, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to be enough context here for stub quality, so I've removed the speedy tag.  ARendedWinter 05:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jay Nunamaker

message: Content is coming very soon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaron.elkins (talk • contribs) 
:What's the five-second summary of why he's notable? Merely being a professor - even a department chair - does not equate to notability. Without evidence of notability, the article is prone to be deleted. —C.Fred (talk) 05:37, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Regents Professor is a clear indication of importance/significance - try following the link. Phil Bridger 09:21, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He is considered to be one of the most influential MIS researchers of all time as well as the father of modern Collaboration Technology, please follow some of the links such as to the Electronic Meeting System while I add the 5 second summary of his importance.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.228.35.205 (talk) 20:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Someshwari River

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.india9.com/i9show/Someswari-River-52412.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sminthopsis84 (talk) 13:40, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Intervertebral disc arthroplasty

message: Most people search for "Artificial Disc Replacement" not "Intervertebral disc arthroplasty" so I suggest the article be renamed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Misterjag (talk • contribs) 02:58, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a redirect from Artificial disc replacement directly to this article. The primary name is per WP policy.  Riverpa (talk) 17:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename this article 

message: I think the regulatory and history sections could benefit from additional information. A better timeline: when the procedure was introduced in Europe, Japan, and the US (major markets where the procedure has undergone significant development). Under regulatory, we need a better timeline for significant studies and approvals in Europe and US (e.g., FDA: 2000-2018). Accessible studies are published and citable. We can add (without editorial) that recent clinical data that demonstrates significantly better patient outcomes than fusion control patients (citable). Insurance companies are changing policy and covering the procedure for patients well into their 60s (citable). Article surprisingly only mentions limitation by CMS for one aspect of the procedure (special conditions apply; if we mention the limitation then we should also add the special conditions). If we're going to mention insurance coverage, should we also add carriers that have been successfully challenged in court (citable). Article mentions lumbar, what about cervical? What about thoracic? 
Looking for guidance and support. Thanks! Wikieditor 3833 13:43, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regulatory & History
Talk:List of islands in the Houtman Abrolhos

message: Hartley Island removed, since it is not in the Gazetteer of Australia. Nor can it be verified otherwise. Its purported location  is in water.--Ratzer (talk) 10:30, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The islands (or rocks) that I added today (Barge Rock, Second Sister, Shag Rock, White Bank) are all in the Gazetteer, and the Department of Fisheries of Western Australia has area figures for them (to be added). With the exception of Second Sister, the new islands are also mentioned in the Inventory of the Land Conservation Values of the Houtman Abrolhos. In the latter documents, several unofficially named islets are also mentioned (e.g. Helms Islet 1 and Helms Islet 2 close to Helms Island), to be exploited for the main article.--Ratzer (talk) 10:42, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Hartley Island
Talk:Spirit tablet

message: I think that there should be a mention of the word "ihai" in the kanji transliteration as well as kana for it as well. Anyone know how to do this at all?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.114.16.32 (talk) 03:24, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Transliteration of Kanji

message: :A spirit tablet is not the same as an idol.
seems either needless [generally speaking, idols are statues and spirit tablets are just writing, a point already made] or (which is actually the case) defensive and unsourced POV injection, trying to draw a line between "pagan" worship and what's going on in East Asia. Lord knows what the status is post-Vatican II but it's a fairly huge deal in religious history that—albeit from a place of extreme ignorance—the Catholic Church took the official position that veneration at spirit tablets is idolatry. Moreover, it's simply false that idols must be statues; there are definitions of the term that certainly apply to spirit tablets. — LlywelynII 00:59, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a witch
Talk:Bharunda

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:44, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 

message: bharunda is a great village but not than pomawa beacause pomawa is a leading village in our district in education and culture  and all young boys played vollyball every days 5pm to 7pm. but the boys is played vollibal very carefully. me lalit meena apko accha khenlne ke liye kheta hoo. Thanks every b.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.99.60.118 (talk) 07:02, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  bharunda is grate village
Talk:Junius P. Rodriguez

message: Mj0514dr and 198.88.216.101 appear to be the same person.  Ditto Nola394 (timestamps, style of edits). Tedickey (talk) 13:47, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit-history

message: Suggest review again for deletion - little change.Parkwells (talk) 20:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: it's now much improved--and he's won national recognition for his many books, including the top prize of the American Library Association.  Rjensen (talk) 11:44, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: No improvement in three years

message: I made some minor improvements to better show this article's notability, but more could probably be made. I can see that this article probably is notable enough to keep, as can be seen by the two unsuccessful deletion attempts. However, at least at first glance, this article still seems like an unnotable promotional biography of an academic (and academics, even those not notable enough for their own articles, do have some impressive work). More work needs to be done to show how Rodriguez is notable enough to have his own article, IMHO (such as by clarifying in the intro, etc.). --1990'sguy (talk) 21:47, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs to be more clear on why it is notable
Talk:Li Siyuan

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Emperor Taizu of Later Liang which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 17:31, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: As far as I know, the article seems so longer. Now your article was promoted to C-Class. If you have suggestions, you may go to my talk page for discussions. Apollo C. Quiboloy fans (talk) 21:50, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promoted to C-Class
Talk:Liu Chengyou

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Emperor Taizu of Later Liang which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 17:31, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Nedbank Golf Challenge

message: Some recent sources give Ken Green as a joint runner-up in 1988, eg the list at http://www.golftoday.co.uk/tours/2013/Nedbank_Golf_Challenge/index.html . However contemporary sources have Allem on 278 (72-71-66-69), Pooley on 279 (67-72-74-66, $200,000) and Green on 280 (67-72-70-71, $100,000) and I have gone for this. As per The Times, http://www.itnsource.com/shotlist//RTV/1988/12/05/BGY603030052/?s=woosnam, https://www.myheritage.com/research/record-10450-8911459/canberra-times-act Also the official 2016 programme here: https://issuu.com/nedbankgolfchallenge/docs/ngc2016/162 (zoom in to see) has Green third which seems to remove all doubt. Nigej (talk) 07:05, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  1988 runner-up
Talk:Min (Ten Kingdoms)

message: Min is the name of the river on which Fuzhou stands.  Surely this is a more likely explanation for the name of the kingdom.  Not that the people are snakes or insects (silly!) but that the river was once infested by them.  Yes/No?  Zoetropo (talk) 04:43, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Min derivation