lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Daniel Elmer Salmon

message: for the part "named after him, although the man who actually discovered Salmonella was his colleague Theobald Smith but Salmon claimed the credit."
:Done.Felix116 (talk) 21:14, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: citation needed
Talk:Willard Metcalf

message: The painting shown over the title "On the Suffolk Coast", is actually "Struggle for the Catch" by Edward Potthast, a mistake that seems to have gained traction on many sites, no doubt assisted by the authority of Wikipedia.  The correct Metcalf painting by that title is shown here: https://www.wikiart.org/en/willard-metcalf/on-the-suffolk-coast
173.79.180.233 (talk) 23:28, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong painting is displayed 

message: I was just wondering how many pennies are out there of the Northwoods painting by Metcalf and if so I believe I may have one of them if they might be one missing 2601:342:4200:3908:8021:D448:CC07:C642 (talk) 22:57, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  W l metcalf Northwoods painting
Talk:Conformal Killing vector field

message: --killing sparrows 19:40, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a _stub_. The context is already crystal clear. Yes, it would be great if someone expanded this article, but having wrong tags on it won't make that happen sooner. --MarSch 11:27, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it may be clear to a mathematician, but it's not 'crystal clear' to me! Could you say something like, 'Killing's equation is used in isomorphic analyses of problems related to the Ratzberger theorem of gravitational whateverthehell?' Then it would have some context. Wikipedia articles should have something to hang on for the average reader, this isn't Mathworld. Thanks. --killing sparrows 17:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I totally agree. It needs better context. Wee it's an Equation! Well, the title tells me that much. So what's it for? That why it needs context. --Lendorien 20:21, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I may be wrong, but on stubs I interpret the context template as saying that it is not clear from the context what the article is about. For example if you couldn't deduce from the article that the conformal Killing equation is some mathematical equation. The fact that there is currently very little content is a different issue. What little content there is is clear, there is just too little of it. Maybe you should have a look at Wikipedia:Requests for expansion. --MarSch 17:55, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Context
Talk:William Dyce

message: William Dyce was a figure of some importance in the Victorian art world. In addition to his painting, he designed the Victorian silver florin, an exceptionally beautiful coin. He also designed a drinking-water fountain at the heart of Streatham, the London suburb (then village) where he lived.
Dyce played a crucial role in drawing public attention to the Pre-Raphaelite painters when they first appeared and were widely attacked. In particular he drew the attention of the great critic John Ruskin to picture by J.E. Millais, which led to Ruskin's defence of the Pre-Raphaelites in The Times.
(posted on WP:WikiProject Biography by Clive Wilmer (talk) 14:45, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: William Dyce
Talk:Demetrios Pepagomenos

message: [Within scholarly purview.]
As a disclaimer, some of the sources cited in this entry may appear to conflate the Demetrios Pepagomenos of history (i.e. 13th century) with the Demetrios Pepagomenos as depicted in Byzantine Greek satire (i.e. 15th century). Readers may assume that either both figures represent two separate historical individuals or that both figures represent the same person that lived for ~200 years (i.e. 13th-15th centuries). Please note that as far as the evidence is concerned, there appears to be only one Demetrios Pepagomenos who was historically a 13th century savant and was posthumously derided in a 15th century satire by Mazaris. Unless there is preponderant evidence to accurately falsify this assessment, it is best that the entry maintain the distinction between a historical figure and how he is portrayed in satirical literature. And as always, I appreciate any good faith edits made towards improving the quality of the entry. Thank you. 
[This statement is explicitly made for the sake of the record and not for the sake of debate.] No. 108 (talk) 16:53, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Stable version
Talk:Hampton Youth Project

message: I removed the deletion nomination and opted to rewrite it as a stub, as it seems to be at least a place of some importance in Hampton. A google search for "Hampton Youth Project" returned 500 results and seemed to feature prominently in lists of neighborhood resources. So, I deleted the text drop and extrapolated what I could from the sparse descriptions that the internet tends to provide. If this does not satisify WP:DP, then please nominate for deletion again, as I've done all I can to salvage the article. Kurrurrin 19:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:William Larkin (painter)

message: I'm beginning an expansion of this article.  I have removed these two external links as essentially useless, but preserving them here in case anyone disagrees.
* http://www.wwar.com/masters/l/larkin-william.html
* http://www.artcyclopedia.com/artists/larkin_william.html
- PKM (talk) 02:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: We've got to track down a better version of :Image:Philip Herbert 4th Earl of Pembroke c 1615.jpg!  This is the only version I have ever seen, though Strong discusses the painting in the FMR article. - PKM (talk) 04:27, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: <Bangs self on head> This is a tipped-in plate in English Icon. - PKM (talk) 23:06, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I replaced it, but the print quality of images in Icon is not spectacular.  - PKM (talk) 23:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: I have nominated this for DYK - if anyone has a better hook, please post it there! - PKM (talk) 21:03, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: DYK Nom

message: *This article needs a discussion of the two trends in Jacobean painting, the "retrogressive" one pointing back to Elizabethan styles and the "psychological" one of Inigo Jones etc., pointing forward to Anthony Van Dyck, and Larkin's place in those trends.  Still mulling over where and how to include that (probably a new subhead "Critical assessment" under "Works").  If anyone wants to tackle that, go for it. 
**Started, could use expanding. - PKM (talk) 00:21, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops, thanks for catching that.  - PKM (talk) 20:49, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: To-do

message: What an informative and beautifully-illustrated article.  Thank-you, PKM. 86.134.30.105 (talk) 13:06, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! - PKM (talk) 05:12, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Well done
Talk:Society for the Suppression of Vice

message: What is the "News Ltd" web site referred to? It doesn't look like the Murdoch-run group from the context.
66.9.52.174 (talk) 08:13, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Where did this material come from?  —Tamfang 19:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  source? 

message: The article has a series of Harvard author-date references, but without full bibliographical details. "Brown 2006" is of no use to anyone. I've dealt with Hochschild 2005 (I hope correctly); and I'm guessing Hague 2007 may be William Hague's biography of Pitt the Younger (but as that was first published in 2005, I'm not making assumptions). Can someone with access to the books try to fix this? GrindtXX (talk) 21:37, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I added what I believe to be the missing Brown 2006 reference.  —PaleoNeonate – 00:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:William Roberts (painter)

message: I am a little surprised no mention is made in this article that William Roberts' fame must have grown somewhat following Penguin Books' decision to use his painting, The Control Room, Civil Defence Headquarters, as the cover art for Penguin's very successful paperback issue of George Orwell's novel '1984' during the 1960s and perhaps also into the 1970s. Certainly would seem to be worth a mention. I don't think I would ever have known of William Roberts except for that. Marty55 (talk) 14:35, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roberts association with Penguin Books
Talk:William Sidney Mount

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Mathew B. Brady - William Sidney Mount.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on November 26, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-11-26. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 05:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Mathew B. Brady - William Sidney Mount.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: I have moved the line in the lead paragraph that flagged a potential Conflict of Interest and moved it to a more appropriate section named "Notable Collections" at the bottom of the article. Please review and let me know   Aabrahamsen2018 (talk) 22:25, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please Void Conflict of Interest Message
Talk:Jan Adams (surgeon)

message: I have edited this entry to specify that Dr. Adams is an MD and I included his years of practice. It is cited from his health grades report.Dreammaker182 15:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Any idea what his residency was in? I assume surgery with probably some fellowship in reconstructive/plastics. While he may not be board certified it doesn't means it isn't board eligible and simply hasn't applied/tested. Bstone (talk) 18:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits

message: The article says the following: "On Tuesday, November 20, 2007, Dr. Adams made Larry King history by walking off the set of the Larry King Live show while on the air, taking off his microphone and ear piece."
What made this history? Was it the very first time that somebody walked off on the air? --NeuronExMachina (talk) 00:52, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently, per Larry King's own words subsequent to the event. One reference: http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/TV/11/21/adams.lkl.walkoff/index.html - Ageekgal (talk) 06:34, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Larry King history 

message: The Kanye West page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanye_west#Mother.27s_death says that his mother was getting a breast reduction while this one says it was augmentation (enlargement). Maybe someone wants to look at sources and correct either article.
Tempel (talk) 07:58, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breast reduction vs. augmentation
Talk:Hebron Academy

message: Two thoughts on the notable alumni section:
1: What attributes of an alumnus/a make that person notable enough for inclusion in this section
2: In some versions, certain notable alums have been removed as a means of censorship and I assume to avoid potential controversy.  In particular, George Lincoln Rockwell's reference was removed sometime between 2018 and 2020.  While Mr. Rockwell is certainly not an alumnus worthy of celebration, it is a historical fact https://www.pressherald.com/2017/09/03/for-years-the-so-called-grandfather-of-neo-nazis-called-maine-his-home/ that he attended the school.  His notoriety is certainly more significant than some other alums included in the notable alumni list.
3: Should the notable alums be organized in chronological order with the year of graduation included in their description?
4: Instead of listing notable alums, could it instead be a sortable table?
96.236.214.162 (talk) 23:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Alumni Discussion
Talk:Wu Changshuo

message: Chinese people now usually call him as Wu Changshuo, because 硕 in modern Chinese is read as shuò. However, in the age of Wu, 硕 was read as shí. Wu called himself as changshi too, not changshuo. He signs on his works sometimes 昌石 due to the same pronunciation of 石 and 硕. I believe the reason for the dispute over the pronunciation of Wu's name is the enactment of 国音常用字汇 in 1932. Wu lived before 1932, but not far from 1932, so his accent was the same as that of now Chinese, the only difference is the pronunciation of Chinese characters. So, I think we better call him as what he called himself. Another famous example is the dispute over 陈寅恪's name, he called himself Chen Yinque, but modern Chinese pronunciation is Chen Yinke.Sacha (talk) 17:53, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The pronunciation of Wu's name
Talk:Elwood V. Jensen

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://healthnews.uc.edu/news/?/692/. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.   ascidian | talk-to-me 21:26, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:License to Wed

message: Does a post in a blog for a regional newspaper, The Times of Northwest Indiana, followed by a few reader comments, qualify as a "controversy"?  I'm not so sure. --Jeremy Butler 11:46, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy? 

message: Add Trivia section with a note : four actors from the movie also work together in an ongoing popular TV-series The Office.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.65.192.86 (talk) 21:42, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: imdb says: Country: USA | Australia. Who knows why? What makes it an Australian Film?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.133.223.207 (talk) 19:03, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian Film 
Talk:Yang Zhichao

message: DaDao art festival webpage lists artist names with family names in all caps. YANG seems to be his family name. Not sure why last person who alphabetized specified sorting by Zhichao.--Larrybob 20:19, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Family name and alphabetization

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://franks-suss.com/chinese-artist-yang-zhichao/; http://intersections.anu.edu.au/issue23/tai.htm and http://www.culturebase.net/artist.php?3776. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:57, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Ian Theodor Beelen

message: The two published 'Works' [Commentarius in Acta...] and [Commentarius in Epistolam S. Pauli ...] has a first name of "Joannis", but this wikipedia article, plus the worldcat.org identity  both have the first name of "Ian". The second and last names [Theodori Beelen] are the same in all four. Could this mean that two different individuals are being confused here, or is the first name incorrect in one of the pairs? Th74 (talk) 23:15, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible error in this author's first name
Talk:Yocheved Weinfeld

message: I have added the COI template, as a SPA keeps adding promotional material, contrary to WP:NOT, in particular WP:NOTCATALOG, WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTRESUME to this article - Arjayay (talk) 17:33, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: COI
Talk:Zdeněk Burian

message: Most of external links are broken  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.129.249.40 (talk) 10:06, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Zhang Zeduan

message: I just added a new section to the article, along with notes and a reference.--PericlesofAthens 08:26, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New Section

message: Where did you get his dates? The only source I found was the colophon so I changed it to 11th-12th century. -- M0rph (talk) 01:21, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates
Talk:Zhao Mengfu

message: Zhao was a member of the Academy of Worthies along with Li Ti.
http://books.google.com/books?id=T7K_fHZkywUC&pg=PA165#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rajmaan (talk) 05:10, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: done - added. Thanks. Keithh (talk) 17:02, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Academy of Worthies 
Talk:Zlatyu Boyadzhiev

message: This stub needs INPUT, especially from Art Critics. I just removed some grave errors. Nemo=Nobody=Nessuno=Niemand=Nadie=Никто=Никой 21:49, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Zygmunt Ajdukiewicz

message: I've taken a look at the portrait in the infobox, and while it's painted by the artist, I can find no evidence that it's a self-portrait. Indeed, the title given on the Polish Paypal site where it comes from gives it the title "Herrenbildnis" (and the date of 1917, the year he died), which translates as "portrait of a gentleman". Under the circumstances, I don't believe it can reliably be claimed to be an image of the artist. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:43, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: *A "portrait of a gentleman" is not the actual title, and neither is this a police manhunt. The chances are good nevertheless that the painting was left unnamed because it was a portrait of self. Poeticbent talk 09:33, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox portrait: what evidence that it's a self-portrait?
Talk:Francis Adams (translator)

message: - biographical note. JFW | T@lk 11:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  J Med Biogr 

message: *
On the title page or this work he is described as a surgeon in which case by British tradition he would be "Mr." not "Dr." and would be described as a surgeon and not a doctor. -- PBS (talk) 11:54, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dr. or Mr.?
Talk:May long weekend

message: I think everything covered in this article is already covered at Victoria Day.  It might be a good candidate for a redirect.--Trystan 22:14, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to agree; this article seems redundant given the contents of Victoria Day, which is the official name of the holiday; "May long weekend" is just a colloquialism. --G2bambino 17:12, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Franciscus Donders

message: Is this the person for whom Donders' test is named? (Visual field test#Exam methods)
--shingra (talk) 23:11, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Even more credit due?
Talk:Fred Soper

message: * THE MOSQUITO KILLER GlitchCraft (talk) 06:15, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  article 
Talk:Freddie Fu

message: The tone of this article on a very successful surgeon was set in November 2011, when a WP:SPA added this , a hagiography without sources. 2601:188:0:ABE6:18BA:9D03:B907:ADF2 (talk) 22:05, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hagiography 
Talk:Frederic E. Mohs

message: Dr. Mohs's first name appears variously in Google results as Frederic and Frederick (and somewhere in Wikipedia as Frederik), the date of his invention of the Mohs Procedure as 1936 and 1938, and the date of his death as 2002 and 2003. Here is an opportunity for someone who has a definitive biography of him (or at least an accurate set of vital statistics) to improve this article.
Snezzy (talk) 01:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Details?

message: Reference 3 (http://www.mohssurgery.org/New/healthCare/history.html) is no longer functional.  -- Tucci78 (talk) 23:06, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defective reference
Talk:Frederick Zugibe

message: It would be good to have the Universities that conferred PhD and MD. Phytism (talk) 00:21, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Academic

message: Warning: the source http://eponymousflower.blogspot.de/2013/07/eucharistic-miracle-of-buenos-aires.html collects information from UCCR which is known in italy for endorsing an extreme view of catholic religion and distorting news continuously. It's at the very least a POV source and really unreliable.
I'd suggest anyone interested to replace the source with something more trustworthy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.254.223.59 (talk) 13:36, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I fully agree that material like this one should never be used as a source for a WP article on a topic linked to religion.  It cannot be viewed as reliable.  What is really strange is that previous versions of this story never mentioned Jorge Mario Bergoglio but now that he has become Pope of the Roman Catholic Charch his name appear in the story.  Finally what is even more strange is that Dr. Zugibe (ot the other physicians and scientifics involved in this story) never took the time to publish their extraordinary findings in a peer reviewed medical or scientific ournal. It is even impossible to find any copy of fac-simile of their reports on web.  Did these reports at least have a real existence? --Lebob (talk) 13:02, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you can see a YouTube video of the documenentaion on YouTube in Ron Tesoriero's documentary: The Eucharistic Miracles of Buenos Aires. 212.216.158.175 (talk) 17:00, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: POV source
Talk:George D. Lundberg

message: His being let go from JAMA was very controversial at the time. A number of  people disagreed with the arguments used to justify his firing, namely that publishing a study on the varying definitions of “had sex” right around the time of the Monica Lewinsky scandal amounted to dragging JAMA into the political debate inappropriately and that the study was outside the proper scope of JAMA. Notcharliechaplin (talk) 14:23, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been added to the article. Skeptic from Britain (talk) 13:50, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

text: I am not trying to ruin his reputation. He was fired from editing the Journal of the American Medical Association because he wrote a controversial article about oral sex. I merely added mention of this to his article, as it was a notable event in his career. Skeptic from Britain (talk) 18:52, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no mention of his controversial firing from JAMA?
Talk:George Huntington

message: Just like to point out an alternative ( or extra) picture of Huntington circa 1872..L∴V 00:03, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earlier Picture of Huntington 

message: Content in this edit is translated from the existing Spanish Wikipedia article at :es:George Huntington; see its history for attribution.
Cbr6vgn (talk) 01:29, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translated Biography Section from Spanish Page