Talk:Dore & Totley railway station

message: The link to the National Railways timetable page, (via the station code in the info box) has been removed, twice, initially with the edit summary "(Rm stn art lnk, Wikipedia is not a timetable". The policy "Wikipedia is not a timetable" is refers to the fact that timetable information is not supposed to be entered onto Wikipedia, not that we should not link, where relevant, to it. Such links are included in the infoboxes for most UK railway stations, and I can see no good reason why they should not be. I propose to reinstate the link, unless there is demonstrable consensus against it. Andy Mabbett 11:53, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Other articles are of no significance in the discussion Pigsonthewing. You've demonstrated yourself in your dissertation above that timetable information is not suitable, it's been removed under those conventions. I propose you don't reinstate them. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 12:10, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've demonstrated exactly the opposite of what you claim. If you're arguing that your removal of the code is justified by a Wikipedia-wide policy, then other articles clearly are of relevance. And consensus here is clearly against you. Andy Mabbett 12:34, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A feeling of déjà vu; There is no consensus. QED. ;) Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 12:38, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On what grounds do you claim that there is no consensus in this case? Andy Mabbett 12:44, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: National Rail timetable link

message: After reviewing the article, your arguments, and searching relevant policy, I find no reason the station code should not be included.  This seems to me much like the ICAO codes for airports and a potentially useful piece of information in the infobox -- as is a link to a timetable itself.  As for the claim that Wikipedia is not a timetable, that link is the only reference I can find to such a policy, and it has been clearly rejected by the community after no consensus could be formed in support of its adoption.  --Selket Talk 05:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Opinion 

message: The original platforms were on either side of the line from Sheffield to Chesterfield. When the north to west chord was constructed, it was to the west of the existing station. So it was the western platform on the original station that became the island platform. That became the "southbound" platform for the new line, but was the northbound platform on the original line. The article wrongly stated that the original southbound platform became the island platform, and that is obviously wrong and I have changed it. 82.29.215.181 (talk) 19:24, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This looks to be correct, as can be seen from pre/post widening Ordnance Survey maps, and it is confirmed by the citation that I have added to the article. Thanks, —Jeremy (talk) 22:30, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Island Platform 

message: Does anyone know when the Hope Lines (through Dore Station) were singled ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JustinSmith (talk • contribs) 22:15, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have managed to narrow down the dates of the singling to between May 1982 (picture of double track - Sheffield Railcentres [pt2] p79 - S R Batty) and 1988 (station singled -Quail Eastern region track diagrams). There is a possibility it was before Aug 1983 because the same Sheffield rail centres book has a picture of the MML through Heeley with "evidence of track reduction" on it. --JustinSmith (talk) 20:19, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It was singled on 31 March 1985 (source: Weekly Operating Notice).–Signalhead < T > 21:23, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hope Valley Line Singled 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Dore and Totley railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110715150949/http://archive.railwayherald.com/Issue221.pdf to http://archive.railwayherald.com/Issue221.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:24, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dore and Totley railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060623073140/http://www.heritagewoodsonline.co.uk/2.%20Archaeology%20and%20Industry.pdf to http://www.heritagewoodsonline.co.uk/2.%20Archaeology%20and%20Industry.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified