Talk:Jacob in Islam

message: For the sake of maintaining NPOV, I have removed two instances from the "Nation of Islam" section where rather fervent assertions against the group's status as Muslims were made.  This seemed to me to be a case of apologetics.--TheBrigand 10:28, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Nonetheless, Yaqub and Jacob are really the same person. It is only Yakub under the Nation of Islam that takes a curve. I think Yaqub and Jacob should be merged, including a brief explanation and link to Yakub --Eliyak 23:32, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm not a fan of the NOI but the current article suggests it had nothing to do with Islam, which is of course not true. Perhaps it should say "the NOI (cult based on Islam)..." or something similar?
--AYBGerrardo 20:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOI? 

message: I wanted to move this article to Yaqub as it was form inception. As Islamic view of Jacob depicting the Prophet Yaqub in Islam so i believe the name of the page should also be depicting the way it is spelled and understood in Islam. Please provide your opinion regarding the move with justification whether positive or negative. -- Ibrahim ebi (talk) 08:43, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for comment on moving [[Islamic view of Jacob]] to [[Yaqub]] 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Islamic views on Abraham which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 20:14, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Abraham in Islam which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 14:59, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: The lead paragraph says "Yaʿqūb is mentioned 16 times in the Qur'an," but later the same paragraph says "Jacob plays a significant role in the story of his son, Joseph, and is referenced around twenty-five times throughout the narrative."  It's clear from context that the latter refers to the Qur'an as well, not the Bible or any other text.  Obviously the number of times he's mentioned in one particular story in the Qur'an can't exceed the number of times he's mentioned in the entire Qur'an, so presumably this reflects an error or a serious inconsistency on what counts as a reference.  Can someone please determine which is correct and make the appropriate edits? 153.31.112.21 (talk) 16:22, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory number of mentions 

message: Change "The Quran further makes it clear that Allah made a covenant with Jacob" to "The Quran elaborates that Allah made a covenant with Jacob" in order to maintain a more neutral stance on the topic. The implication that "The Quran further makes it clear" takes the stance that other religions are incomplete. While from an Islamic theological point of view, it is certainly true that the Quran is intended to make clear ideas from other Abrahamic religions, Wikipedia should take a non-partial stance on the veracity of religious topics. Especially as the other Abrahamic religions do not necessarily view themselves as being incomplete.
LiquidSurfaceEnergy (talk) 04:42, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phrasing Suggestion