Talk:Inman Park

message: There's a picture here of the cotton warehouse water tower which is actually in the Old Fourth Ward (ie west of the tracks). I'll remove it in a day or two. Also, this article doesn't sound very encyclopedic, I'll try to clean some of that up too. --Jolomo 17:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I almost want to tag it for a rewrite of tone the way it reads - however, the content is great.  It's more of a story than an encyclopedia article.  I didn't want to just blow in, slap on a tag, and leave though.  Does anyone object? Thanks, CSZero 18:52, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, a good portion of the history section (and the writing in question) appears to be a copyvio added by an anon from InmanPark.org's History page. Should those parts be removed entirely and an "original" sourced history written? Or can it be cleaned up from what's there now? AUTiger » talk 02:25, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: Does this article read like a historical narrative or a story to anyone? Moreso than an informative article, that is. A bit of flair adds to the reading, but there should be more information that goes with it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.238.6.18 (talk) 20:54, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Story... 

message: The bulk of the article has been copied and pasted from the Inman Park Neighborhood Association's website.  That is why it sounds like marketing and not an encyclopedia.  The entire article needs to be re-written.  A Softer Answer (talk) 03:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy and Paste

message: The photograph of "historic bungalows" is captioned incorrectly - the two homes at 923 and 925 Austin Avenue in the photo are new construction and not historic.  They were built in 2001-2002 as verified in Fulton County Assessor data.  This photo should be removed and replaced with a photo of actual historic homes, or at least recaptioned for accuracy.Ast 87 (talk) 15:02, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bungalows in photo are not historic 

message: There is a long quote from a major Atlanta paper that described the neighborhood when it was first developed.  The quote contains the sentence, "There are no negroes and not a single objectionable inhabitant."  Should this be kept or removed.  To keep it in offends the modern sensibilities.  To remove it is to remove the fact that it was a segregated neighborhood and that at the time, white supremacy was a given.  At the time, neighborhoods in ATL were being developed with covenants that decreed that they would be 'white only'.   Which is more important: historical accuracy or modern sensibility? A Softer Answer (talk) 01:59, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you kidding me? Remove a relevant, historic quote because it offends modern sensibilities? That is censorship and totally wrong. The quote needs to be there. If people are offended, as they hopefully are, it serves as a reminder about how the world was 100+ years ago. If we erase the past, we are doomed to repeat it. Keizers (talk) 05:08, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Offensive language, segregation, erasing the past 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Inman Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120317013620/http://citycouncil.atlantaga.gov/2002/images/adopted/0410/02O0050.pdf to http://citycouncil.atlantaga.gov/2002/images/adopted/0410/02O0050.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:51, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Inman Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140821183806/http://inmanpark.org/park-social/ to http://inmanpark.org/park-social/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140821132151/http://inmanpark.org/about-inman-park/npu/ to http://inmanpark.org/about-inman-park/npu/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720095322/http://www.inmanpark.org/mead_1.php to http://www.inmanpark.org/mead_1.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:30, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified