Talk:New York Stock Exchange

message: Since a comprehensive list of companies listed on the NYSE takes up about a dozen columns of tiny print in the New York Times, is it meaningful, useful, or necessary to name a handful here? --Charles A. L. 20:57, Nov 16, 2003 (UTC)
: I agree, especially as some of the examples seemed to be picked a bit randomly.  I've removed them, but added a reference to the DJIA nearer the top that people can link to if they want examples of NYSE listings.  Also tried to address Ryguasu's point above about the link between the Dow and the NYSE being tenuous -- the Dow is supposed to be the list of the 30 biggest listed companies in the US, and while almost every big blue-chip company lists on the NYSE they will always be very much associated with each other.  ben 10:03, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: List of companies

message: I'm thinking of adding something to this page about the recent criticisms people have been making of the NYSE.  The main things I am thinking of are:
* the specialist's conflict of interest between maintaining an orderly market and making a profit out of it, including the recent SEC settlement with six big specialist firms
* the NYSE's resistance to electronic trading, and Arca and Instinet's claim that the trade-through rule helps maintain the NYSE's monopoly
* bit more on Dick Grasso and the compensation committee, plus the board's dual role as regulator and maintainer of a profitable organisation.
Oviously a lot of work needs to go into making sure it remains NPOV by giving the NYSE's arguments against all of these criticisms.
What I'm not sure about is whether to have a separate section about it recent controversies, or to extend the article as a whole and then drop in the issues where appropriate (e.g. explain who the specialist is and what they do, then bring in the conflict).   Possibly blending it in would suggest a more NPOV than a separate section, but then again they are pretty big issues and their resolution could end up changing the way the securities industry operates dramatically.
Any thoughts?  ben 10:19, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  NYSE Controversy 

message: Leading sentence in para 2: "NYSE trades, unlike those on some other more "virtual" exchanges (e.g. NASDAQ), always involve face-to-face communication in a particular physical location."
NASDAQ is not a 'virtual' exchange, it is a real exchange with read bid and read ask prices.  This sentence implies some mock superiority to me.  Those that trade on the NYSE do not necessarily do it face-to-face, the technical function of the market isn't necessary toexplain what the market is - perhaps a statement saying the market is technically implemented through a 'specialist', rather than a 'market maker' (like NASDAQ, LSE, etc).  Happy to draft a link to 'specialist' v. 'market maker' page (have not found any such article on Wikipedia)... Investopedia explains the difference here (http://www.investopedia.com/university/electronictrading/trading1.asp) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.137.85.47 (talk) 20:37, 13 August 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Real exchange

message: If someone can add notes about when the ginormous flag first appeared, that would be great.  I don't remember ever seeing it in TV footage until after September 11, but it might have been used for a special event or something (4th of July, for instance).  From what I can tell, it's not usually there today except for special occasions, but I'm halfway across the continent and it's not exactly on my drive to work (even if I had a job ;-)...  —User:Mulad (talk) 06:02, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)
:Here's a story about the flag: http://www.zitopartners.com/the-flag-on-the-nyse-facade  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.157.207.146 (talk) 11:18, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag 

message: Something should be mentioned about what time the NYSE usually opens and closes. -- AllyUnion (talk) 07:01, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Is it open on weekends? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.218.161.59 (talk) 06:27, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Another issue regarding the bell - The NYSE site offers a pretty scant history. Apparently, a gong was used initially, but there has always been a bell at the new (1903) site. Meanwhile, there's no information about when they started allowing and inviting "guest" ringers. The mindless clappers up there when trading opens and closes has always bothered me. 72.177.96.237 (talk) 23:50, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening and closing bell 

message: The April 2005 announcement was of the intent of NYSE and ARchipelago to merge, and separately for the new entity to become a public, for-profit company.  This merger is subject to law suits, and regulatory approvals.  As of July 2005 NYSE is still a not-for-profit member owned organization.  The formal changes will likely take place sometime in 2006. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.153.255.134 (talk) 21:52, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger is intended, not yet effective

message: I am reading a book I stumbled on to at a used book sale entitled "Road to War: America 1914-1917" published in 1935 by New York Herald Tribune correspondent Walter Millis. It is there that I have learned for the first time that NYSE in 1914 had its longest closure-far longer than all the others combined-of 4 1/2 months, although the author states that a vibrant street market on the sidewalk outside the exchange's closed doors quickly emerged.
Your brief comment on this indicates that the exchange reopened in late November 1914 after having been closed since late July (in order to prevent panic selling of Euro stocks according to another source) initially to allow limited trading in bonds and then on a full service basis in mid-December 1914.  The part about initial bond trading, however, is accompanied by the comment that this was done to aid the war effort, a statement that only the passage of almost a century, makes it seem not as politically loaded as it should be.  Moreover, the first Allied War Loan was not floated privately until late September 1915 via the House of Morgan so the bonds traded could not have been European War bonds, although Morgan had been acting as the purchasing agent for the British's non-munitions purchases in a context, due to the British Navy's supremacy on the seas and its blockade of Central Powers shipping, that favored one side from the get-go and was in fact a contentious political issue at the time itself, during the period of what is described as Colonel House's clownishisly naive peace feelers and shuttle diplomacy.
Why is this significant?  Because America was neutral in 1914 and did not enter the war until April 1917.  In fact, Millis' book-an example of the isolationaist sentiment of the 30s, but nonetheless a brilliant work-sort of the "Best and the Brightest" of WW1 by someone who lived through it, talks about the ambiguoius and conflicted sentiment in this country, even among key policy players and how Americans-even those in high places like Wilson and Colonel House (Wilson's central advisor based in the White House and a precursor-and sadly also a caricature-of the Kissinger like "national security advisor") were naively manipulated like stereotypical American rubes by the British authorities in a situation that was not at all akin to that faced in the Second World War.  Secretary of State of William Jennings Bryan, however, to his everlasting credit, believed in scrupulously adhering to neutrality and filed a formal protest against British violations of American neutrality in January 1915 in the context of the devastating impact on American business due to the loss of the German and Austro-Hungarinan markets particularly that for cotton.
As a matter of fact, notwithstanding substantial pro-British sentiment across the board, the prospect of us joining the war on the side of the Germans on a limited basis as we did with Napoleon in 1812 in order to defend our shipping rights was not an incredible option at least prior to the Lusitania (RMS Lusitania) episode of May 1915 (another story).  Germany in WW1 was not the Third Reich, it was a constitutional monarchy like Britain with vibrant opposition parties that voted for the war during the patriotic hysteria of 1914. Britain, saddled with an increasingly Junker like aristocracy of its own, presided over the largest empire in human history that ruled over places as disparate as India and Ireland with less than kid gloves.
Most ironically, many of the German-Americans in this country at the time were Jewish who hewed to their loyalty to the Fatherland.  Jacob Schiff, for example, a stereotypical top-hatted Jewish capitalist refused to join with Morgan, a rabid anti-semite, in floating the Allied bonds. (see also, "House of Morgan" by Ron Chernow). Why, not just because it violated neutrality but because-and we should never forget this-one of the "Allies" was Tsarist Russia, the most autocratic, feudal and viciously anti-semitic regime in Europe at the time with vicious lynch-mob like massacres of Jews called "pogroms" being a feature of their culture and history, a regime Schiff abhored the prospect of aiding.
Consequently, Lord Grey ranted and raved against "Schiff and the Jews of Kuhn-Loeb" that were standing in the way of his bringing the U.S. into the war, a task that was made easy from the beginning by the British Navy's severing of the German and Austrian trans-atlantic cables, British businesses' ownership of the neutral cables and the fact that most U.S. papers' European bureaus were based in London and often staffed heavily by English people causing most US news, already Allied skewed, to go through the British censor.  Thus the gross exagerrations-and even outright fabrications-about German atrocities in Belgium etc.
In conclusion and with apologies for the extended polemic, if anyone has more information about the 1914 closure I would appreciate its being posted.  Thank you, Tom Cod — Preceding undated comment added 20:58, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 1914 NYSE Closure

message: I visited this article after reading this bbc article. There is an inconsistency between them and one have to be wrong. See statements below:
:NYSE is the largest stock exchange in the world, although its trading volume was exceeded by that of NASDAQ. That is from wikipedia
:The NYSE will now become the world's second-biggest publicly-traded stock exchange by market value, behind Deutsche Boerse. That is from BBC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wk muriithi (talk • contribs) 02:27, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual error?? 

message: For historical purpose, a paragraph of ownership arrangement when NYSE was private would be enlightening. This can serve as a good starting point
Also, instead of being owned by its 1,366 members, many of whom rent out their seats on the exchange and can be slow when approving changes, the NYSE will be shareholder-owned.
NYSE members will earn $300,000 (£172,000) for each seat and share 70% of shares in the new company.
I am curious, if a seat is not similar to a share, would it be close to a voting right in co-operatives? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wk muriithi (talk • contribs) 02:47, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  A seat is the right to do business. It's not a share of the business! I suppose you could think of it as a condominium, the ownership of which allows you to trade listed shares with other condo owners. Similarly, you can own (and rent or sell, if it comes to that) a condominium apartment, garage or parking space, or boat slip. If the information above is correct, $300K for a seat is very low, given that a seat sold for $4 million in 2005. Obviously what is happening is that the members are getting stock in the new corporation plus a bit of a sweetner in the form of a cash payment up front. Archernewland (talk) 20:15, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seat?? What the heck is that? 

message: I am reading a book about Jay Gould that describes a trading venue on Wall St in the 19th Century known as "Gallagher's Evening Exchange" where stocks would be traded after hours.  Does anyone have any further information about this?  In addition, there is discussion of NYSE trading on the "Open Board" and "Closed Board" at that time.  The only reference to it online that I could find follows below. Tom Cod 21:54, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gallagher's Evening Exchange?

message: Something is clearly wrong in the first part of the article. A lot of nonsense in there. I have no time to fix it :/ Jobjörn 10:32, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsense 

message: Now I've recently heard in work that the NSE's older auction style system of trading is responsible for a failure rate hich can be as high as 20% and that all of this can be attributed to human error which would be eliminated if it switched to an electonic trading platform such as that used in the UK. does anyone know anything about this? - BTW, when i say "i heard in work" i mean in a seminar in work, not off the office bore in the canteen so i guess it must have a basis in fact? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.43.13.101 (talk) 15:23, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  High trade failure rate of the NSE 

message: This article provides *no* history of the NYSE from 1817-1914.  This article should provide a much fuller history of the institution its supposed to describe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThaddeusFrye (talk • contribs) 18:02, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  1817-1914? 

message: So exactly how many companies are in the NYSE? The intro paragraph only says second largest compared to  the NASDAQ, but not a number, which would be better. --70.111.218.254 03:36, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of companies 

message: The trading floor picture of the NYSE is from the early 1990's, I happened to notice this because I am a regular viewer of CNBC and that is not how the floor looks today. Can someone please update that photo?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.127.4.140 (talk) 05:50, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trading floor picture 

message: What time does the NYSE trading floor open and close?  What days does it operate? --1000Faces 11:38, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Monday through Friday 9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time. As part of the Euronext merger, we may see a much longer trading day (16 hours or so.) (At least that's what Thain has indicated)  —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 19:37, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operating Hours? 

message: Regarding the addition of :Category:Self-regulatory organizations, this category will need to be removed shortly, as NYSE is merging its regulatory side with that of the NASD. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 19:35, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-regulating? 

message: I tried and failed to put the financial markets template into this page, can someone who knows wiki formatting please put it in so it looks decent? 19:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Elipongo (Talk|contribs) 08:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. That template cluttered up an already overly cluttered section. Remember, not all readers have huge screens. You can probably use a navbox at the bottom to achieve what you wanted. Zain Ebrahim (talk) 07:48, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Financial markets Template 

message: Just a thought, but shouldn't information about unexpected closure(s) be included here somewhere, maybe just a paragraph in the history section or something. it was a pretty big deal when Rage Against The Machine caused the closure in 2000. And to my knowledge that was the first (and only?) time it happened... - DevAnubis 11:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Questioning the RATM inclusion as a bit pop culture-y/hipster cute.  Seems out of place within the general context of the article.  Agree closures might be interesting but would that open the door then to all service interruptions?  That would be almost its own page.  Ziquemu (talk) 02:25, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unexpected Closurs 

message: I've uploaded another picture of the building. I think it's better than the ones shown on the page, but I'm biased since I took the picture.
I'd be pleased if you'd want to use it on the page. I haven't added it myself since there are already plenty of pictures and I'm not sure which one to remove to make place for mine.
Gfk 23:21, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another picture of the building 

message: Aren't there a lot of pictures when having the actual size of the article in mind? How about a gallery at the bottom? TobykwAn 11:40, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery? 

message: I find the lead confusing.  If Bombay has 4800, NASDAQ 3200, and NYSE 2764 listings, then NYSE will be the third largest by number of listings, but the lead says it is the second largest by this criterion.  Have I misunderstood, and could the lead be rewritten more clearly? --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 22:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the assertion that it was 2nd highest - that makes no sense to me given the other information. The problem we now have is that the lead says that the NYSE has a different number of listings than the infobox. Which is right? Anyone know? Zain Ebrahim (talk) 07:50, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead paragraph

message: american owned or american based companies only?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.104.67.222 (talk) 16:00, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New York Exchanged 

message: I would like to start a category on Companies Formerly Listed on New York Stock Exchange.  Any suggestions on a name (or does it exist already).  Thanks. Americasroof (talk) 12:36, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Companies Formerly Listed on New York Stock Exchange Category

message: I really don't think that "Black Wednesday" was a name given to October 13. Those kinds of names are only really used a few years or even decades after the event. Unless someone can source that their is a concensus on this name, I'm deleting it.JakeH07 (talk) 21:48, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Black Wednesday" 

message: The first sentence says that nyse has "2,764+ listed securities". The second says that it has listings for "3,200 companies". This is very confusing. Each company's stock is a security and the only securities the exchange handles are stocks, so why are these numbers different? Bobbyi (talk) 14:37, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A single company may issue several different securities - e.g., it may have preferred shares and common shares, and it may have several series of preferred or common shares.  So the number of companies and the number of securities should be different; but the number of securities should always be larger than the number of companies.137.186.53.25 (talk) 16:54, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "securities" vs "companies" 

message: Please note that the coordinates in this article need fixing as:
*
your wrong. red dot is precisely off the mark. your welcomeSuperscript text
(Previous comment added 2008-10-26T20:59:59 by 75.172.166.138 .)
:From today, there were three separate sets of coordinates in the article. I eliminated the Coord template from the bottom of the article (in edit mode), since we could use either of the infobox coordinates to display at the title. I embedded Infobox NRHP into Infobox Exchange, allowing the potential to reduce the coordinates further to one set only. The locator map pin (the "red dot" from the above comment) apparently only works with the "lat_degrees long_degrees" format, so I chose that format for the coordinates. BrainMarble (talk) 15:35, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 

message: # of companies listed and market cap need updating (spring 2009)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.207.140 (talk) 16:50, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: Where did the "founded" part of the infobox go? How come it doesnt show? Tri400 (talk) 16:34, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. Good thing someone caught this in less than a year... right. Fixed. Gary King (talk) 01:38, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founded in Infobox?

message: There is nothing related with the huge american flag that is there. Is the flag always there? Why? Who had the idea? Which measurements it has? All I'm wondering should be added. --Catalaalatac (talk) 15:25, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I would have to add, if you're looking for a picture to illustrate the architecture of the building, and the columns are particularly mentioned in the caption, a picture with a flag covering practically all the columns and a good part of the entire facade is really not the best choice. 71.176.111.94 (talk) 17:52, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag 

message: I think that the article should have a separated section dedicated to the ceremonial ring of the opening bell, its meaning, history and so on. I was looking for it and I just found the caption for one of the images. --Dia^ (talk) 10:21, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ring of opening bell 

message: I do not know how to remove the two older logos (the blue ones). Those are no longer in use. Current logo should be kept.Sposer (talk) 03:20, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505123_162-57560197/intercontinentalexchange-to-buy-nyse-for-$8.2b/
Kristinelark  tilde, tilde, tilde, tilde  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kristinelark (talk • contribs) 03:03, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in last line of 3rd paragraph, which has no edit button. I think $5 billion should be $11 billion. 

message: Removing a recently added sentence about NYSE takeover of Libor administration because it is not directly relevant to the New York Stock Exchange. This page is about the stock exchange, its parent company is NYSE Euronext which is creating a new subsidiary, NYSE Euronext Rates Administration Limited (see announcement at http://www.bba.org.uk/media/article/bba-to-hand-over-administration-of-libor-to-nyse-euronext-rate-administrati), a London-based, UK registered company, regulated by the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority. (see chief executive of the BBA's article at http://www.cityam.com/article/libor-now-has-new-administrator-our-reforms-have-gone-much-further). This subsidiary will administer Libor from early 2014, while the New York Stock Exchange is a separate subsidiary of NYSE Euronext. The change in administration is covered on the pages for NYSE Euronext and Libor. --Whizz40 (talk) 10:52, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Libor Administration 

message: I have removed the following two paragraphs from the tail of the "Notable events" section, and copied them here. Reason for removal: they look like a biographical sketch for an individual, and as such they do not seem to have proper place in the article.
On 18 August 2014 Sam Jordan most recently served as CFO. In 2013, Mr. Sam Jordan responsibilities were expanded to also include oversight for global operations and information technology. He held a variety of positions in corporate finance in America and abroad while at The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation.
Mr. Sam Jordan has served on the boards of ProQuest, the Madison Square Boys and Girls Club, and Westchester County Association.  He earned an MBA in Finance from the McCombs School of Business of The University of Texas at Austin, with CPA Certification in the State of New York, and holds a Corporate Law in Accounting from the University of Delaware.
glopk (talk) 13:24, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed bio-sketch from Notable events section 

message: Would that warrant its own article? Iamahashtag (talk) 01:53, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  July 8 Computer Glitch 

message: Is it overkill that we have three separate history sections? History, Notable Events, and Timeline. Kendall-K1 (talk) 01:52, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: It seems to me we have way too much detail on the "Sleep Now in the Fire" incident. This is the longest paragraph in the "Notable events" section, longer than the 1929 crash paragraph, and about as long as the corresponding section of Sleep Now in the Fire. Readers can click through to the main article if they want this much detail. Kendall-K1 (talk) 18:33, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sleep Now in the Fire 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on New York Stock Exchange. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131029193653/http://www.nyse.com/about/listed/nya_characteristics.shtml to http://www.nyse.com/about/listed/nya_characteristics.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100515175903/http://www.nyse.com:80/about/history/timeline_chronology_index.html to http://www.nyse.com/about/history/timeline_chronology_index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:56, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on New York Stock Exchange. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130120184408/http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_22230588/nyse-ice-shares-halted-sale-talks-reported to http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_22230588/nyse-ice-shares-halted-sale-talks-reported
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120201223924/http://www.cnbc.com/id/46216847 to http://www.cnbc.com/id/46216847
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:34, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The New York Stock Exchange traces its founding to the signing of the Buttonwood Agreement (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buttonwood_Agreement) on May 17, 1792 not the creation of the 1817 constitution.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.110.3.4 (talk) 15:30, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founding date of the NYSE 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on New York Stock Exchange. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130120184408/http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_22230588/nyse-ice-shares-halted-sale-talks-reported to http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_22230588/nyse-ice-shares-halted-sale-talks-reported
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120201223924/http://www.cnbc.com/id/46216847 to http://www.cnbc.com/id/46216847
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:55, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Euronext has been separated from ICE per Euronext#Listing_of_Euronext_and_separation_from_ICE, and so we should update the Euronext info in the lead section. --Mathieu ottawa (talk) 22:52, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Has it been done?--Dthomsen8 (talk) 16:50, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Euronext has been separated from ICE 

message: Are NYSE companies inherently notable on Wikipedia? I would suspect so, but I welcome other opinions.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 21:56, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  NYSE companies inherently notable? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on New York Stock Exchange. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100611125227/http://www.nyse.com/about/history/timeline_trading.html to https://www.nyse.com/about/history/timeline_trading.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.nyse.com/press/1222772889985.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070925210452/http://www.nyse.com/pdfs/closings.pdf to https://www.nyse.com/pdfs/closings.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: This page contains registered trademarks of Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, Inc. ("ICE") or its affiliates that are being used without an indication that they are trademarks. On behalf of ICE, we suggest the following be added as the last sentence of the lead section:
“The terms New York Stock Exchange®, NYSE®, The Big Board®, Intercontinental Exchange®, NYSE Composite Index®, The Closing Bell®, and NYSE ARCA® are registered trademarks of Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, Inc. or its affiliates.”  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.175.3.8 (talk) 21:07, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of ICE Registered Trademarks 

message: There is plenty of ways to dial in a more attractive P&L... SCAC being one 8 figures a week is the average of a logistics brokerage dealing in DOD loads, any further ideas or concerns please contact me I generally will guarantee market share growth and quarterly numbers if I have an incentive, honking is great but my Oynixa doesnt understand and needs to take a look at ://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/news/tom-york-on-business-crowley-s-new-etug-ready-to-make-green-w Crowleys Etug Ill be learning about and hopefully somehow get a more private way of "crossing the mainframes" or what have you. Have a great day open Amtrak doors... 198.49.31.146 (talk) 16:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  SCAC