lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Derby Tri Junct railway station

message: Chevin - Nice article - perhaps just a little too enthusiastic for its subject to be truly NPOV?
Bob Linuxlad
People, perhaps, don't know much about Derby's history. I've seen text books that write as if Cromford is close to Manchester, for instance and, of course, Nottingham is a much bigger city. I felt it necessary to explain why:
* Derby investors had money burning holes in their pockets
* Why they needed transport
* Why the railway, compared with Nottingham investors relative lack of interest. See Midland Counties Railway
Chevin 18:03, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

message: There is some confusion as to the location of Castle Fields.
Pixton suggests an original proposal was the station to be "nearer the town centre at Castle Fields, yet most writers record the present site as Castle Fields, indeed the National Heritage has the North Midlands address as Castle Fields. Today the Main Centre, part of the Eagle Centre, is also known as Castle Fields, and the original Castle, which disappeared just after the Norman Conquest was on what later became Cockpit Hill. On the other hand, Burdett's map of 1791 shows Castle Fields as a house in the area of what is now Liversage Street.  I would imagine that it was originally a farm of that name. Castle Ward extends over this area, though oddly, the station is in Litchurch Ward.
Chevin 11:52, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Castle Fields

message: In the first attempt at this article, I included a rumour that the station was originally further south, but I couldn't find any confirmation, nor did it seem likely. I have more recently found a document by the Derbyshire Archaeological Society suggesting that there was such a station - a temporary arrangement in 1839 by the Brirmingham And Derby Junction Railway. Chevin 08:34, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Earlier Station to the South

message: I've at last managed to sort out the problem with Castlefields.Chevin 16:05, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Castlefields

message: My copy of Pevsner (Buildings of England, Derbyshire, 2nd edition, 1978, edited by Williamson)  says of Midland Station 'Incorporated into the building is the tower of Francis Thompson's celebrated Trijunct Station of 1839-41, built jointly for 3 companies. ...
Anyone know if it's still there after the recent mods?
* There were two towers, one at each end. What Pevsner must be talking about is after the refurbishment of the booking hall and the addition by the Midland of the porte-cochere at the front(I think that what its called,) like Nottingham and Leicester. However since the 1990 rebuild it's all gone. 16:59, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Designer

message: I have finally found good information. Castlefields was an estate extending from the present Castlefields in the Eagle Centre out to Litchurch parish. Hence the station was, after all, built in Castlefields, but not nearer the town as some literature suggests. Chevin 07:24, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Castlefields (again)
Talk:Lunatic

message: I am not confortable about this article being in :category:mental health. Would it be more appropriate to put it in :category:mental illness, an alternative, or neither? I would be interested on others' people's thoughts on this matter. --Vincej 13:53, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

message: I removed the section about women's menstral cycle being about equal to the lunar cycle. It doesn't relate to the rest of the section unless PMS is assumed to be a form of lunacy (a view that at least 50% of the world would have a problem with). A discussion of how this belief has led to the institutionalization of 'deviant' women, I think, would make this an appropriate item--this discussion could include a reference to the origion of the term hysterical which derives from the greek word for womb which early doctors saw as a source of madness. The sentence is copied below for easy reference.
"Many women suffer from premenstrual stress syndrome, which can involve depression and irritability.  The menstrual cycle is more-or-less the same length as the lunar cycle."Antonrojo 15:57, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Non Sequiter

message: I to think that it should be under mental illness!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.179.114.107 (talk) 21:23, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Totally Agree! 

message: This article does not mention that "lunatic" is used either as a) a dated old fashioned term from the 19th C or earlier, as in 'lunatic asylum', and signifying out-dated views of psychiatry, or as b) an informal derogatory term. 84.13.42.164 (talk) 23:07, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old-fashioned 

message: So humanity have lived with the moon for like... several thousands of years... And not getting used to the moon cycle?
But when we suddenly gets electricity, then we get used to it and get less crazy!
Just a random note, not to be taken seriously, but I somehow needed to say it. Maybe the moon made me.
// Alice  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.78.215.131 (talk) 20:59, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something I do not get 

message: I'm researching this topic and can't find any reference in Pliny's writings to the moon affecting the brain. All citations for it I've found go back to the Kelly article but he doesn't actually cite or quote Pliny himself. Maybe that line should be removed? 212.221.15.99 (talk) 12:53, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pliny attribution
Talk:Price–Anderson Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act/Archive 2

message: Cut from into:
:It also makes available a pool  of insurance funds to compensate people who are injured or incur damages from a nuclear or radiological incident.
During the Mediation, one or more people said that this sentence was a problem. Uncle Ed 13:52, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
::Ben said so, but it's better than the inaccurate line "The Act promises taxpayer-backed indemnity for extraordinary nuclear incidents while providing for limited compensation to victims". Simesa 00:03, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute over pool 

message: I did a third archive. Everything here is "post moderated" if that makes sense. --Woohookitty 20:55, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Archiving

message: Simesa mentioned this on the moderated talk but just so its here too...the article should be reprotected when Ed leaves for a week or else chaos will ensue, I assure you. :) "Inmates running the asylum" is a good term for it. --Woohookitty 00:39, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Note for Ed

message: Let's not be hasty and start accusing each other of things like:
*over-zealously applying text moves.
*gaming the system
It takes a while to get used to the new rules. We might want to adopt a convention which says that when A moves some text which B wrote (or otherwise approves), then B is not allowed to replace it with something similar. Rather, A and B both should agree on a formulation which satisfies them both. 
And maybe even C should be the one to replace the mutually acceptable version. 
Try to work it out. Aim for unbiased text which does not take sides but which describes both sides. Uncle Ed 01:36, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
:Respectfully, I stand by my original statement.  Do you disagree that those kinds of edits are counter to the text move rules you established?  I ask not to be obstreperous but to have a clear ruling on how exactly we are to interpret your rules.  Is it considered a "revert" of a text move if we reword a sentence to use different words that convey the same meaning of a disputed item that was moved prior? · Katefan0(scribble) 02:59, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
:My only problem is...as we've said before...this article is already mostly criticism. So we're walking a fine line here. The language that Ben wants is going to have to not sound like criticisms of Price-Anderson. Otherwise, we're going to take a tilted article and make it into a near diatribe. I wish myself that we would ban the buzzwords I mentioned earlier because they don't get us anywhere. They are just derisive and dividing. --Woohookitty 02:36, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: New rules
Talk:María Teresa Rodríguez del Toro y Alaysa

message: As far as I know, in Venezuelan history Rodriguez is nothing but Bolivar's wife, and that is alraedy said in the article. I think that the tag is not necessary anymore. --Jdiazch 14:08, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance

message: user:Elmidae I looked and didn't find anything in the MOS about not having refs in the lead (but I didn't look all that hard.)  Can you point to something in the MOS that discusses this? RJFJR (talk) 18:15, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: it's at MOS:LEADCITE. I've always taken the standard to be "only put refs in lead if statement is likely to be challenged, otherwise keep it free of refs". None of these seem controversial, so I'd move them out. In addition ref 3 is ONLY in the lede, which is a definite no-no, and should be attached to wherever that item is treated in the text body. - Probably should just do this but I was in NPP mode at the time and not intending to do much copy-editing along the way. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:19, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you.  That was what I was looking for and couldn't find.  (That page also answered something I'd been meaning to look at and hadn't gotten to.) RJFJR (talk) 22:25, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Refs in lead
Template talk:Chicago metropolitan area

message: Rockford is in Chicagoland?! --goethean ॐ 14:20, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

message: I have done away with the regions section of the template and replaced it with "States" because only two, very loosly defined regions were listed. The whole template deals with a region, and splitting Chicagoland up into smaller sub-regions seems futile as there is an overwhelming number of possible regions. In this case, only two were listed and they covered a very small part of Chicagoland. IMO, if you are going to pick two regions, I would not have picked those two; they dont even have articles. --Gpyoung talk 16:28, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regions ---> States 

message: I've added counties to the Chicagoland template that are listed as being part of Chicagoland.  Was there some reason for previously excluding them? Thanks. Ufwuct 15:14, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Counties

message: Should we bother making the distinction between these two categories? perhaps should we just catagozrize based on size, making the top something like 60,000, and the middle 30,000? Is the current distinction really useful? --YbborT 21:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cities vs. Towns vs. Villages

message: Titling this template "Metropolitan area of Chicagoland" is annoyingly redundant. Notwithstanding the usage concerns, can we call it either "Chicagoland" OR "Chicago Metropolitan Area" and not a mix of the terms? Speciate 19:57, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundancy

message: Used WikiCleaner to update wikilinks, only change was to 2000 Census page name.  Thanks!
Funandtrvl (talk) 19:17, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiCleaner
Talk:Morgan Spurlock

message: To add to this article: which type of cancer he died from. 98.123.38.211 (talk) 15:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It is important to note that his death is from "complications of cancer" not cancer itself. It can be difficult to determine the exact cause of death as complications of cancer could mean bone metastasis pain, hypercalcemia, and venous thromboembolism. As per noted in the previous comment, the type of cancer has not be publisized. Jurisdicta (talk) 18:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add to article 

message: Is it fair to speculate his 30 days of eating McDonald's caused his, unfortunate and early, death? 206.84.252.154 (talk) 19:48, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not fair to speculate, as there is not a factual link between eating fast food for 30 days and dying of cancer. I would say his lifetime alcohol addiction (of which he speaks about in his 2017 Twitter post) is more likely the cause of his death, and his liver complications seen in the 2004 documentary, "Supersize Me". He stated that he was never sober for more than a week, and had been drinking since the age of 13. 73.73.196.31 (talk) 21:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow. I had no idea. Thank you for clarifying. 206.84.252.154 (talk) 15:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Talk:Der Doppelgänger

message: I've just restored a few well-meaning but wrong corrections of the text. I'm putting a note here for the benefit of future editors who might be inclined to make the same corrections.
* Heine definitely wrote "demselben Platz", not "dem selben Platz".
* He definitely wrote "du bleiche Geselle", with a lowercase "d", despite the preceding exclamation mark. He may possibly have written a comma rather than an exclamation mark.
* He probably wrote "eigne", not "eig'ne".
Sources:
* Breitkopf & Haertel edition of Schubert's complete works (ed. Mandyczewski), 1895, as reproduced in the Dover edition of the Schubert song cycles: "demselben", "eig'ne", "Doppelgänger! du".
* Moore, "Singer and Accompanist", chapter on "Der Doppelgänger": "demselben", "eigne", "Doppelgänger, du".
* Liner notes to Schreier & Schiff's recording of Schwanengesang: "demselben", "eigne", "Doppelgänger, du".
* Gutenberg etext of Heine's Buch der Lieder: "demselben", "eigne", "Doppelgänger! du".
* 22nd edition of the Buch der Lieder, Hoffmann und Campe, 1864: "demselben", "eig'ne", "Doppelgänger, du".
* Manchester University Press edition of the Buch der Lieder, 1920: "demselben", "eigne", "Doppelgänger! du".
I've gone with the last of these on the grounds that unlike the others it's an actual scholarly edition and shows every sign of having been carefully researched.
Gareth McCaughan (talk) 00:39, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A few textual details 

message: Does the text shown here refer to Heine's or Schubert's version? The original poem notably says Doppeltgänger, whereas Schubert omits the 't'. It should be clarified which version is referenced here and the difference might be worth noting separately. Zitronensorbet (talk) 10:38, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doppel(t)gänger
Talk:Venezuelan War of Independence

message: In the spanish wiki we are using the more conventional use for Venezuelan War of Independence (see es:Independencia de Venezuela), that goes since 1810 until 1830 (or maybe 1824, with the victory of the republican army). The interwiki is then setted from this page to that of independence. In the english wiki there's not such a page, the closest is Bolivar's War, but it also includes other independence processes. Maybe a new article is needed. --Jdiazch 14:43, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Article's name

message: As I am by no means an expert on this and I could have misunderstood but certain points in this article seem to contradict the one on Bolívar's War, in particular the time around 1811 and 1812. In this article it sounds like a bloodless truce has been reached and Bolívar has received an official post in the Venezuelan army and shopped Miranda to the Spanish, whereas in the other article it seems that he had by this time fled after Miranda was defeated by the Spanish and captured. It would be good if someone with far better knowledge than me could clarify this as I think these are really important events in history. 
Cameronlad 10:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy 

message: I've rewroted the article so it can fit all the war(1811-1823), instead of being dispersed everywhere like it currently is;i'll keep writing it when i get better source--Andres rojas22 15:16, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes 

message: Unification of the discussion in one place. (see here) --Muwatallis II (talk) 14:44, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy over the aggregation of the British Legion in the infobox 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ovenly Furnace (talk) 11:03, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Academic Writing II 2pm
Talk:Schwinger's quantum action principle

message: From looking at good books (like Joachain, 1975) on scattering theory on Schwinger variatonal principle, I really don't understand what is the relation of this article with what is known in the literature under this name.  Is the Schwinger variational principles really so simple?  Since I don't know what is SAB, I cannot judge.  But as far as I know I am thinking at a crackpot!
* I agree with the user above, the value of SAB should be indicated although if its an action perhaps is of the form:
 S_{AB}= \alpha (\dot X )^{2}-V(X) 
where X is the position operator and V is the potential..
::Also, a definition of S needs to be given. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:59, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't understand
Talk:Catnip (disambiguation)

message: Merge this with Nepeta and do away with the ridiculous title.--Daveswagon 15:04, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Catnip is usually only used for Nepeta cataria.  I think the catnip specific part of Nepeta should be merged into Catnip, rather than the other way around, and Nepeta should be a genus-level article as its title suggests. -- WormRunner | Talk 01:39, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Au contraireidoodly my friend. "Nepeta is a genus of the mint family, Lamiaceae, the members of which are known as catnips or catmints" I.e., "catnip" refers to the genus, not the species. Whatsisname 01:52, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I very much disagree about this move.  WormRunner | Talk 03:50, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Cordwainer Smith

message: The following two from 2006 comments were inserted inside the text that is now inside the box in this subsection's parent section, between its first two 'graphs, apparently as comments on the content of that 'graph.--Jerzy•t 06:27 & 07:59, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You seem to have forgotten about Atomsk in your list of novels. --maru  (talk) Contribs 22:14, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In the same edit, Marudubshinki also became the first of three editors to change the removed content; details in my succeeding contrib to this section, with identical timestamp.--Jerzy•t 06:27, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

text: It's mentioned in the lead, but is not described as science fiction. - BanyanTree 22:19, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Re post-removal comments on, and changes to, the removed text)  

message: There's no mention of how Linebarger got involved with the science-fiction world, how he became a writer, where he published his fiction, etc. Surely something should be added about this. The part called "Science-fiction" is good, but it describes what you may find in his stories and novel, it doesn't provide an outline of his career as a pro writer.--93.40.110.126 (talk) 18:43, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: He was an amateur. During his writing career, he was very secretive. Few details exist. If someone did start adding a bunch of bio stuff, I would be skeptical of it. Modinyr (talk) 00:04, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: What is Missing in the Life section

message: Do we really need the definitions of cordwainer and smith, especially in the intro? Did Linebarger ever state there was some significance in his choice of pen name? Clarityfiend (talk) 05:55, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The name "Smith" is so common in English-speaking societies that it's bound to rub against almost any other English word sooner or later.  Without a source, this is WP:OR... AnonMoos (talk) 22:57, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Word meanings 

message: There is no mention of his mother.  I understand: hr was not forthcoming, but he certainly looks oriental in the photo, and his father and he have very Anglo-Euro names.  Anyone know?  rags (talk) 18:22, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  mother
Talk:Estienne de La Roche

message: This page was difficult to copyedit, due to what appeared to be an autotranslation (judging by the sort of errors that occurred). I've corrected what I could and looked at the French language page for information, but I know nothing about this person, so someone familiar with La Roche and the controversy regarding his book should take a look at this. I may have created some errors by guessing wrong on the peculiar English. I'd be happy to work with a French speaker on improving this article to make the translation smoother. Deirdre 15:08, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact checking & edits needed 
Talk:Cham Albanians

message: "Later, in 1258 when groups of Albanians around Dyrrachion (Durrës) were allied with the Despot of Epirus, Michael II Doukas, there was no evidence of Albanians in Epirus"
While 2 sentences before, following appears: "During this time, the earliest mention of Albanians within the region of Epirus is recorded in a Venetian document of 1210 as inhabiting the area opposite the island of Corfu"
I somehow do not understand the context. I also failed verification for the first claim. AlexBachmann (talk) 19:32, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the source: , hence it refers to specific Albanian groups and their movement southwards. Such a movement is indeed undocumented but Albanians were already present in the region in 1210 and as Lopasić (1992) writes:  which means that there's no reason to include the statement about 1258 in the article. --Maleschreiber (talk) 19:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ?
Talk:T. T. Durai

message: What does TT Durai's name T.T stands for? Please help. Mr Tan 15:51, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full name 

message: Indeed. This issue is really too complicated, it needs a more neutral tone... Otherwise it will not be a successful Wikipedia article. Ruennsheng 14:28, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yep 
Talk:Red river hog

message: English isn't my mother-tongue. I have just translated this page, hoping not to have done bad mistakes. However, I think this article should be wikified at least.
--Suhardian 15:22, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Would it be helpful if I put where the latin name stems from? Cheeseman1
Sadly, the citation used for the hog's voice sounding like the Rite of Spring's bassoon solo does not actually include any information on the hog's voice at all. Would it be helpful if someone requested further citation? cranhandler  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.217.246.186 (talk) 14:11, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: There are two different species of bush pigs (=genus: potamochoerus): The "real" Bushpig (Potamochoerus larvatus) and the Red River Hog (Potamochoerus porcus).
The article says the Red River Hog is also called bushpig? Is that correct? If so, it's confusing. If not, it should be corrected. There should also be a notice in the article to clear up the confusion!
--Spdobro 15:52, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Porcus vs. Larvatus 

message: It is confusing that the weight is given in pounds followed immediately by the metric height  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.230.178.1 (talk) 03:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misc