lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mint chocolate chip

message: It is Sir Thomas Sherwood's  favorite flavor of ice cream.
It is mine too.. - Aemaeth  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.48.185.54 (talk) 22:34, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sir Thomas Sherwood 

message: Is it really relevant to the article that Timothy McVeigh ate mint chocolate chip ice cream before he was executed?—Biosketch (talk) 02:52, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timothy McVeigh
Talk:Artisanal fishing

message: This article has been chosen for monitoring and improvement by the Stockholm Environment Institute SDG 14 project (see here). We will be monitoring improvements to July 2022 using a scoring tool devised of both automated and expert evaluation. The score for the entire article on Feb 11, 2021 was 64.6/100. For the lead it was 40.7/100. Suggested article improvements: 
* more examples from  different countries
* article needs more detail and sections - the footer template is rather good is full of linked terms and should be the basis for a more comprehensive article
* the lead image could use a more complete caption
* the several images in the article could use more complete captions. ASRASR (talk) 14:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Housekeeping comment: we didn't get around to making further improvements as part of the mentioned project. I hope someone else will... EMsmile (talk) 15:10, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Scoring and suggested article improvements
Talk:Remainderman

message: Remainderman is a concept of English law. A purely American term, such as "IRA custodian" should be avoided, at least not used without clarification. The entire reference to "required minimum distribution rules for retirement accounts" should be under a separate heading for American tax law - assuming that it needs to be retained at all, as it seems only remotely connected with the subject matter of the article.
"Incidentally, I doubt that the Irish Republican Army(IRA) had much to do with remaindermen!Royalcourtier (talk) 01:44, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  American-specific terms 

message: What's "chattel"?  It's used in the article.  Thanks, DavidMCEddy (talk) 18:14, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chattel
Portal talk:Telecommunication

message: WikiProject Portals is back!
The project was rebooted and completely overhauled on April 17th, 2018. Its goals are to revitalize the entire portal system, make building and maintaining portals easier, support the ongoing improvement of portals and the editors dedicated to this, and design the portals of the future.
As of May 2nd, 2018, membership is at 60 editors, and growing. You are welcome to join us.
There are design initiatives for revitalizing the portals system as a whole, and for improving each component of portals.  So far, 2 new dynamic components have been developed: Template:Transclude lead excerpt and Template:Transclude random excerpt.
Tools are provided for building and maintaining portals, including automated portals that update themselves in various ways.
And, if you are bored and would like something to occupy your mind, we have a wonderful task list.
From your friendly neighborhood Portals WikiProject. Hope to see you there. Sincerely,      — The Transhumanist    07:47, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice from the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals|Portals WikiProject]] 

message: Hey, i wanted to pring this :d:Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control#ITU radio emission designation to your attention. Lots of standardized radio transmission modes and even basic modulation types are lacking Wikidata statements to an internationally agreed system for classifying radio frequency signals such as the ITU designation. I would be happy about your opinions and support on Wikidata. Thanks! --Ptolusque (talk) 17:34, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Property proposal for ITU radio emission designation on Wikidata
Talk:José Youshimatz

message: He currently has a soon, his name is Manuel Alejandro Youshimatz. He is cycler too. Is the future Jose Youshimatz, he is one of the most handsome teenager on sports.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.167.51.128 (talk) 05:09, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Europa Universalis: Crown of the North

message: I noticed through new page patrol the disagreement over whether or not to merge/redirect those two articles here. Rather than discussion through edit comments I thought it might be useful to have a real discussion. I'm happy to participate (as someone who has played Paradox games, I have some interest) but am pretty agnostic as of now whether or not these should be merged/redirected. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 14:46, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This merge has been proposed, but I'm opposed to such a merge under the current title. Europa Universalis: Crown of the North is the English title for Svea Rike III, and therefore has nothing at all to do with the first two games. The lead section of this article is also about the third game, not the first two. If a merge is made, it should use a title and lead that adequately covers all three games. Rua (mew) 14:48, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

text: And in three years you haven't added any notable sources to those articles. --Mika1h (talk) 21:46, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  That's irrelevant. Delete them for all I care. Just don't redirect them to the wrong article. Rua (mew) 08:45, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge/Redirect Svea Rike & Svea Rike II?
Talk:Batman: The 12 Cent Adventure

message: I removed the PROD as there are better solutions:
1. The justification of just being a one-shot isn't sufficient as we have a number of one-shots (there is even a category) however, it would need to be shown to be an important one to keep.
2. That said as this is a prelude to Batman: War Games it would make sense to merge it there.
I'll leave the floor open for discussion and other ideas and if nothing better presents itself in a few days I'll propose a merge (which is what probably should have been done in the first place). (Emperor 16:50, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: PROD
Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/AC/DC/archive1

message: Videmus Omnia, may I ask why you chose to initiate a FAR and "post notification" to the WikiProjects and editors and WP:FUR instead of 1) editing the article, and 2) posting a note on the article talk page? -Susanlesch 13:40, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Those are the instructions at WP:FAR. Simply deleting the audio files is too bold a move for an article which was approved as featured with these audio files (although the non-free content criteria has tightened since then). Videmus Omnia  Talk  13:58, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about notification
Talk:Joe and Eddie

message: Several sources -- a couple of liner notes, as well as Eddie Brown's website -- make reference to Gilbert having some sort of medical problem or mental illness which he overcame. I've been unable to find anything to indicate exactly what this was. I think it's an important part of the story and should be added if anyone can track down the information. More detail can also be provided regarding Eddie Brown. The article makes it seem as if his career ended with Joe's death, when the bio on Brown's website indicates otherwise. 23skidoo 13:58, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Joe Gilbert's health problem and Eddie after his death

message: The image currently leading the page will need to  be replaced. Wikipedia's rules on image use don't allow for record covers to be used, plus this particular image seems to be tiny, anyway. I'll see if I can get a better image from a frame grab. 23skidoo 14:03, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Main image
Talk:Nongmaithem Pahari

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:43, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Battle of the Kerch Peninsula

message: The below sentences begin with one name and follow up with another...
The 46th Infantry Division under General Hans Graf von Sponeck was the only division in a position to be able to block the advance. Von Manstein believed it could contain the landing,
there is a problem here. Did something get deleted?Ryoung122 15:45, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Who is Von Manstein?

message: I will try to add some additional material and expand the article generally around next week or so, after I gather some more sources. GABHello! 00:50, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intend to get working 

message: What is the basis for giving the size of merchant vessels in long tons?  Displacement is the common measure for naval vessels, but not for civilian ships.  Does the cited source actual say long tons or displacement for all of the listed vessels? Kablammo (talk) 22:48, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed units of weight from the descriptions of merchant ships.  Kablammo (talk) 13:03, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: In a related matter:  I have also removed "short tons" from the article as there is no indication that the sources used such a measure.  Kablammo (talk) 12:58, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size of merchant ships 

message: *What was used, is this documented in the sources or does it use the more vague term Poison Gas as well
*Was it Old WW1 Stock of Blistering Agents ,  or was it Zyklon B, etc
*Minor detail, but i thought i'd ask
--Eric Lotze (talk) 20:14, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Further Detail on the Poison Gas
Talk:Highlander: The Last of the MacLeods

message: There is a rumor that Highlander: The Last of the MacLeods across the web, that it was releaced in 1994, let my tell you that it is not true because, the Atari Jaguar CD was releaced in 1995, to avoid speculation Im gonna change the releace date to 1995. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 21:11, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of releace?!
Talk:Profit (real property)

message: Hello, 
Today (14 January 2021) I edited the introduction of this page to include additional information, but the changes I made were reverted within one minute. 
I would be grateful if anyone could advise why this decision was reached, and as to how I ought to proceed with improving this page. 
Thank you.
Chilli plant (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 15:10, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Kadyrov Grozny International Airport

message: When looking at the map position of the airport and Grozny itself, based on the map coordinates provided in both articles, the above description of the location of the airport seems incorrect. Judging from these data, the airport is located directly to the east of Grozny. __meco (talk) 08:02, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "9 km north of Grozny" ?
Talk:Carlson School of Management

message: Aaron Clarey Graduated from here but he's being frequently removed from the notable alluimia due to him being associated with the alt right and qualifies to be on here given he's sold over 1 million copies of his various different books. make sure to re add him if he's removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7000:9e3a:2da:844b:11b0:e12d:400a (talk • contribs) 00:02, April 7, 2024 (UTC)
:No, he's been removed because he doesn't have a Wikipedia article and thus doesn't seem to be "notable" like the other people already included in the list. ElKevbo (talk) 13:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested addition of Aaron Clarey to notable alumni
Template talk:Detroit Red Wings

message: If the Legend of the Octopus exists as a page, why isn't it linked on this page? —OverMyHead 00:39, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Octopus 

message: The 'Victoria Cougars' are not (to my understanding) the same franchise as the Detroit Cougars/Falcons/Red Wings. Perhaps it should be deleted. GoodDay (talk) 18:19, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Victoria Cougars 

message: Would it be appropriate to include Hakan Andersson in this template, perhaps in the Culture/Lore section?  Rejectwater (talk) 15:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hakan Andersson 

message: The Detroit Red Wings portal was recently deleted. I've removed the red link from the template. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 10:51, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: No portal, no portal link
Talk:WNRS-FM

message: Thank you Neutralhomer for the civility; I learned your point just now. Is the any WMOS section for reading up on 'standard layouts' for the lede?. (I'm very ok with the idea --just don't know where to find it when needed for an article review.)--Jbeans (talk) 04:04, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure if it is in the WP:MOS (though I would think it would be), but we (members of WP:WPRS) use this as our lede layout.  I have tweaked it a little over the years so it "flows" better.  What you see on the page here is an example of that "tweaking".  As for the article itself, well, that needs some trimming. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 10:46, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Layout
Talk:Peggy Levitt

message: I am in the process of getting new and improved material approved to be posted for this article. 
Dgandco 15:04, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Approved by whom? If you're concerned about it, put it on the talk page for us to look at before it hits the article. —C.Fred (talk) 21:58, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stratification (mathematics)

message: I changed the section heading from 'New Foundations' to 'Set theory' in the hopes that it would be clearer at first glance that we're talking about 'set theory' of which NF is one axiomatization. Zero sharp 15:06, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New Foundations

message: Question. I am mostly self taught when it comes to the formal logics, and I've found propositional and first order predicate logic fairly intuitive. I am trying to understand stratification as it applies to negation in the bodies of HORNSAT rules. Looking at the 'In mathematical logic' section, the need for stratification in clauses with negated atoms is understandable, yet I can not find any definition (here or elsewhere) that explains what the stratification number (S) represents or how it is derived.  This is an issue that seems to impact more than just Wikipedia's explanation of the topic, giving me the impression that the implicit stratification number of a predicate is something that students would grasp out of context.  However, with multiple definitions I've read, the definition of the stratification number itself and the manner in witch it is supplied are never explicitly stated, only that a rule head must be greater than or equal to (unless negated, then just greater than) than all of the atoms in the body.  Is this number related to the concept of safe horn clause rules (no free variables in the head that are not also refrenced in the body)? In regards to the article, is this something that needs to be explained more clearly? C4Cypher (talk) 15:23, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Stratified Negation

message: There is a further definition of P-stratification, for various properties P: a P-stratification of a constructible set A is a partition of A into a finite collection of constructible sets each having property P.  See   Deltahedron (talk) 17:07, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stratification in field arithmetic
Talk:Highlander: The Series season 3

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems 
Talk:Highlander: The Series season 4

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems 
Talk:Highlander: The Series season 5

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems 
Talk:Khamaria, Jabalpur

message: Hello, I was wondering what that '8 secrets of india' is. I couldn't find anything on google. Should it be in the article? --BackToThePast 15:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think someone added it for fun. So I am removing it. Sgangan (talk) 10:34, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:18, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Assyrian nationalism

message: I have imported the "continuity" paragraph from [[names of Syriac Christians". The question of cultural continuity is a topic of Assyrianism (in the sense that Assyrianism needs to postulate continuity). 
The quotations seem to boil down to the situation that the question is unsettled and somewhat disputed, but that there does seem to be a good chance that some amount of Assyrian continuity may have survived in the lowest strata of society. It will obviously be impossible to gauge its precise nature or extent since there are no sources (it is impossible to get a clear picture of the lower classes anywhere in ancient history). --dab (𒁳) 10:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I think the section about continuity claims is making the article disproportionately long. Would anyone mind if I move it to a separate article and keep a concise mention here?--Rafy talk 00:59, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time to split? 

message: Upon reviewing edits made by User:Qworty, it was noted that he removed this quote in 2009.  I will leave it up to the active editors on this topic as to whether it should remain deleted or be reinstated.  Content follows:
According to Dr. David B. Perley, one of the founding fathers of Assyrianism, Assyrian is defined as:
Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 23:38, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content removed 

message: These two pages overlap in the sense that the Assyrian independence movement is Assyrian nationalism in practice. Nationalism is the theory by which the indepdence movement operates, I don't think it's possible to seperate the two. Can someone else please give their opinion? Ramsin93 (talk) 18:30, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Assyrian independence movement]]
Talk:64th Flying Training Wing

message: the 64th at reese was actually a rebadged 3500th. This was done to continue the heritage of wartime units...when I figure out how this works i'll be back  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Patton610 (talk • contribs) 00:48, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: I've merged the 64 FTW with its newest incarnation, the 64 AEG. Ndunruh (talk) 16:14, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge 

message: The two are not the same unit.  --Lineagegeek (talk) 22:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Split