lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bhinmal

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:45, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 
Talk:Adiposis dolorosa

message: This article was categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM:CAT. Calmer Waters 03:13, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article categorization 

message: Endocrine involvement was doubted as early as in 1933 and further ruled out in 1952. Present-day methods have not revealed any endocrine abnormalities. An endocrine dysfunction as the etiology of Dercum’s disease has little support in the modern literature.
Source: http://www.ojrd.com/content/pdf/1750-1172-7-23.pdf
74.132.147.247 (talk) 10:54, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Endocrine Involvement 

message: This page claims the term for this disease is outdated, citing an a scientific article that does not claim the term is outdated, and uses the term over 20 times for the disease. However, let’s say I misread the cited article and the term is outdated—shouldn’t this page redirect instead of saying that the term is outdated? Most of these edits were done by RiteCode, who has an interesting edit history where they have removed sections of articles pointing out controversy and even replacing sections pointing out controversy with the actual controversial statement being discussed (see edit on 173 bytes on May 27, 2020 on Lipedema page). I want these edits reviewed, please! Catmattack (talk) 08:17, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article gutted, why?
Talk:The enemy is "Shinobazu"

message: I have proposed this article's deletion for the reasons stated on the main and history pages. I would advise people not to remove the template but to discuss it here instead. The episode comes out in a couple of days...just wait.The great kawa 20:57, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a deletion would have been fine, it would have created a red link which people would have noticed the need to fill. A redirect made it look like the job had already been done, and in fact created a self-redirect on the episode list page. Something to consider in future, maybe it would have been better just to make a preliminary stub on the information available. 86.20.30.144 09:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Deletion
Talk:Bhusawal

message: You are invited to work on Ahirani language wiki at  Ahirani Wikipedia in incubation . Mahitgar (talk) 04:36, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ahirani Wikipedia in incubation 

message: This article have lots of extra irrelevant information. WP is for just overview of any subject not for providing detail information. I suggest to clean extra irrelevant information. And some subsection don't have citation so reader is not  able to verify it I suggest to add Citation for it otherwise remove it. Kundan Ravindra Dhayade (talk) 10:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs cleanups 

message: I want to add reliable sources Dongar Kathorekar (talk) 16:24, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  how many citations required to remove the additional citationz required tag? 
Talk:Newport Baroque Orchestra

message: I don't understand the criteria for deletion if http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Trinity_Baroque is kept but Newport Baroque Orchestra isn't. Both are quite similar.
:Yeah, I didn't feel that this one should be considered spam.  You may want to consider rewriting the last paragraph to make sure it doesn't sound like you're promoting something, though. --Mr. Lefty  (talk) 21:01, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bilari

message: Can new users, please refer to Wikipedia:How to edit a page before editing this page. --Vince (talk) 09:43, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing this page 

message: 21 Or 24 kms. Sahaifamily (talk) 17:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  How far is Bilari from Moradabad by road? 
Talk:Sports training montage

message: Is it just me or should this item be like a sub-paragraph under the montage (film) topic?  While this topic is interesting and technically a real thing, I don't know if it is useful enough to garner it's own topic.  Is it too specific?  Now.... discuss. Rhetth 21:00, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you and added the 'merge proposal' tag to the article. Tocharianne 03:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The merge notice has been here for a while and no one's responded, so I've gone ahead and merged it. Tocharianne 04:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too specific for a wiki topic?
Talk:Bilha, India

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:11, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition
Talk:Stachys lanata

message: Awfully confused here.  Lamb's-ear, which is a hugely popular temperate garden plant (and weed) in the U.S., is specifically called Stachys byzantina in all our major databases--that is, 
*GRIN []
*NCBI  []
and in ITIS, Stachys byzantina is called woolly hedgenettle.  []
However, none of these three databases recognizes a species called Stacys lanata at all.  Not even as a synonym.
Furthermore, the Wiki entry (a stub) for Stachys byzantina refers to an entirely different species, which the stub identifies as woolly bettony.  But the plant illustrated there is not a lamb's ear. 
The references given for using Stachys lanata are several horticultural sites, and such sites--although they may have excellent information on the maintenance of a plant--are notoriously inaccurate in binomial nomenclature.
What am I missing?  Is there a reason this should not be changed?   NaySay 14:46, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is exactly what I found, and I concur.  NaySay 16:23, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's not native, and not particularly weedy in the States, so why would it be on the USDA list?  Check KEW and ITIS, first.  KP Botany 18:45, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

text: As I said above, the species does not exist in ITIS.  GRIN, the database arm of the USDA, which is  very inclusive of every spore which has passed through immigration, and any plant with the slightest economic impact that hasn't, does not recognize it.  If it were a fairly obscure Madagascan variety, this wouldn't be surprising.  But for a common garden plant, it would doubtless be there.    As for Kew, if you'd like to check it and report back, please do.  NaySay 21:37, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, EPIC finds some references, 4 from IPNI: Stachys lanata (epic) Mork the delayer 05:42, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this species name correct?
Talk:Budaun

message: Sai Ari Budaun The House of multi colour Printing Palce
Sai Printer's A House of Screen printing
BUDAUN WAS EARLIER KNOWN AS VEDAMAU AFTER THE RISHI BADAM. HE WAS A GREAT KNOWLEDGEBALE AND SIDDH YOGI. PANDAVAS DURING THEIR AGYASWAT PERIOD OF 1 YEAR HAD VISITED THIS PLACE. LATER THE CITY WAS NAMED AS BUDAUN. NARENDRA SINGH, BUDAUN  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.78.71 (talk) 08:24, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

message: chote sarkar  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.177.104.20 (talk) 05:23, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  bade sarkar 

message: what is the following to mean since it gives the impression to someone not familiar with India that there is a "Western Uttar Pradesh" because if you look at the map it is located in the eastern part of the state:
"Uttar Pradesh, India. It is located near the Ganges river, in the center of Western Uttar Pradesh"
Is "Western Uttar Pradesh" a region?66.74.176.59 (talk) 06:35, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is What :Uttar Pradesh or Western Uttar Pradesh ? 

message: Please add blog on this also 2409:4053:2E15:94CD:7330:C575:21F6:AA06 (talk) 08:01, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: - don't use or refer to blogs - Arjayay (talk) 10:14, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chote bade sarkar dargah
Talk:Budhni

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:22, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 
Talk:Burhanpur

message: I am going to edit the "Political History of the last two decades", toning it down to maybe the elected representative of the city. Please contribute your suggestions. --Balsumeet 13:06, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why a huge section on Politics of Burhanpur?

message: The external link http://www.burhanpurcity.com/ says this domain is for sale. I have removed it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Viveksoley (talk • contribs) 11:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  external link 

message: * Those who are interested in developing this page are requested to follow the norms laid down in Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Cities. Please provide a proper reference or source for whatever you add to this page, in order that others can verify the facts from that reference. Matter without reference is likely to be deleted. -- P.K.Niyogi 12:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Guideline

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:23, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Attilan

message: Both groups need a catchall page that all these articles can be merged into, Tonaja and Stallior do not require their own pages. They need something like this List of Avatar: The Last Airbender major secondary characters. --69.136.111.100 18:28, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor Inhumans and Evil Inhumans 

message: I wanted to add Marilla, Luna's nanny, who was killed by Iron Man. But the format of the page is so unfamilar to me I do not know how to add it in without (maybe) screwing everything up. Lots42 00:35, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marilla 

message: This page says "It first appeared in Fantastic Four #47 (Feb. 1966)", however the Inhumans page says "Their home, the city of Attilan, was first mentioned years earlier, in a Tuk the Caveboy story written and drawn by Jack Kirby that appeared in Captain America Comics #1 (March 1941)." These pages are inconsistent, and I am unable to validate either stance myself. --Roughana (talk) 07:10, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Mention Inconsistency 

message: Is simply redundant information that can be better maintained and represented in the Inhumans article. Ridernyc (talk) 21:18, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The information given in the Attilan is not the same as in the Inhumans article. There is overlap, but they are not the same and the context is completely different. The Attilan article is focused on the element of setting whereas the Inhumans article is focused more on character and plot. 42of8 (talk) 04:50, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Inhumans]]
Talk:Highland Park Village

message: Can someone please tell me how it isn't beneficial for people to know what amenities this place offers? Everyone is so quick to call it a promotion when it is just a fact they offer more than a movie theatre. Wikilove2022 (talk) 17:30, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding facts being accused of promo
Talk:Jack Learns to Jump Good

message: i seem to remember that this episode ended with jack sliceing acue, and then jack would have been able to go into a portal back to the past, right before he got to the portal, the episode ended.  What happend??  Is this episode canon??  -Chris
:Yes, it's canon, but that always confused me, too.  Presumably, Aku somehow slipped away again with the time portal after the episode ended. Caswin 14:18, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Jon Weaving

message: I've done no research beyond stepping thru the edit history, and finding that: 
: _ _ Three editors contributed virtually all the prose. _ _ The originator, single-article editor User:Aries 00, had two sessions, one ending a minute after the initial revision was saved and the other lasting 30 minutes, 6 hours later, and their edits, while inconsistent with cut-and-pasting from a well-proofread digital source, are consistent with either hand- or OCR-transcription from a copyright-protected source; they changed previously-saved wording only in one case: essentially to supplement the first sentence after the article's lead sent (which had begun with his early teachers) by mentioning his place of birth. (This proves very little, even tho most writers probably don't save the first digital draft between polishing structure and catching typos: some may thoroly draft original copy on paper, but make the the first save without catching the typos; IMO it is nevertheless cause for concern.) _ _ One of them was the single-edit editor User:Weaving.
My gut makes me suspect one or more CopyVios.--Jerzy•t 02:46, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio? 

message: I not only assume but believe that it was in good faith that  was removed, when adding "sources", w/o changes to the prose and without linking those sources to specific statements. But no presumption that they document this article is justified, and the template should have been replaced with . Eventually i noticed that one of the "sources" is the source i found for the YoB of the subject (for the page Weaving (surname)), leading me to edit the accompanying article to add that information to it as well. Having already read the piddling info that is available at the external lk, i've added refs for the three or so facts it verifies. When colleagues have, as it were, set side-by-side the article and the other Web pages in question, and clearly indicated via refs which facts they support (implicitly informing readers which remain unsupported), the article will need weighing of the level of detailed refs against the standards of WP:BLP, for consideration of the tag coming off.--Jerzy•t 02:46, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sources"
Talk:Big Dig ceiling collapse

message: Can someone confirm which of these planned repairs were executed.
http://www.boston.com/news/traffic/bigdig/articles/2006/07/18/romney_details_repair_plan_for_tunnel_ceiling/?page=full
* Attaching ceiling pieces to embedded steel beams.
* Installing 10-inch undercut anchor bolts into the concrete in areas where steel beams were not present.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.153.69.104 (talk) 04:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Repairs Executed

message: I tried to clean up some confusing text regarding the Fort Point Channel Tunnel and the Ted Williams Tunnel, which were mentioned without explaining their relationship.  Also, the article lede says that a 3 ton panel fell, while a later description says 12 tons.  This might be because 12 tons fell, but the particular panel that crushed the car "only" weighed 3 tons, but I'm reluctant to try to fix this without knowing for certain what happened.  The entire article should be swept from beginning to end, and updated . Reify-tech (talk) 21:26, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion cleanup and update needed
Talk:Eskimo bowline

message: Surprisingly, for an "ancient" knot, I don't immediately find this knot in the ABoK. Jordan Brown (talk) 21:10, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ABoK 

message: If the Eskimo and Cosack knots are indeed the same, the mirror image, minor variations, or confused as to which variation is named which, then perhaps the articles should be combined. Alexgenaud (talk) 20:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, did that now. Buz11 (talk) 20:47, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combine Eskimo and Cosack loop articles
Talk:International Bank for Reconstruction and Development

message: This article is being discussed at the World Bank Group talk page. Please visit to participate in the discussion about the future of this article. --Brettbergeron 21:17, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Revision

message: This article would greatly benefit from information on governance and decision making by the IBRD.  "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" makes the claim that the IBRD is a major factor in producing Third World poverty. John D. Croft (talk) 09:40, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Information on governance would be important here

message: Article requires expansionOther dictionaries are better (talk) 16:12, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency

message: This article is being discussed at the World Bank Group talk page. Please visit to participate in the discussion about the future of this article. --Brettbergeron 21:18, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Revision 
Talk:Socratic problem

message: In the present version of the article, there's way too much on Schleiermacher's view and not really much of anything about other views, particularly more modern views, such as those of Gregory Vlastos and Charles Kahn.  Also, something should be said about the view of John Burnet and A.E. Taylor which was prominent at the beginning of the 20th century.  Isokrates 21:25, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The lines "The Socratic problem' (or Socratic question) is the term for the situation in the history of scholarship with respect to the existing materia pertaining to the individual known as Socrates which scholars rely upon as the only extant sources for knowing anything at all about this individual, but when compared, show contradictions and do not agree. It is apparent to scholarship that this problem is now deemed a task seeming impossible to clarify and thus perhaps now classified as unsolvable."
in the lead in sound overly sophisticated to me, and I'm afraid they may be a copy-and-paste from one of the sources listed as references (specifically refs #2 or 3). Unfortunately, those texts are from a restricted access source, so I can't check. I'd appreciate it if someone with access to WileyOnline library or the Cambridge Library would check it out.
It may be that those lines are original to some Wikipedia contributor, so I haven't tagged them with a :Template:Copypaste. Even if they aren't, it would be a simple fix to add parentheses and make them an acceptable quote. In any case, the wording here is far too complex for a lead, which is supposed to be a simple description of a page's content. It's practically a tongue-twister right now. Would somebody with a better grasp of this article's subject consider simplifying/clarifying the lead?
Thanks for reading. -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 19:29, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked both sources and it looks the wording on the article is original. Either way even if it was copied and pasted from any source, we would only need to add quote marks since the sources are already correctly cited. Hope this helps. Either way will adjust the sentence a bit. Huitzilopochtli (talk) 07:52, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overly confusing lead/Possible copyright vio
Talk:Lord of the Flies (1963 film)

message: I removed the first bit of "trivia" in that section, which said that this was the first film to be shot on location. I think that should be called into serious consideration, and thus I removed it until someone gives me a source. 70.176.169.63 05:28, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia section 

message: According to Tom Chapin's (the singer and brother of Harry Chapin) own web site, Tom Chapin is NOT the actor listed amongst the credits in this film. Accordingly, the hyperlink to the Wikipedia Tom Chapin article should be removed from this article. Here is a link to the FAQ from his (the singer's) homepage 
http://members.aol.com/chapinfo/tc/tcfaq.html  Thank you.
Also, the Hugh Edwards that is linked was 60 years old when the movie was made, so he could not be the same one who actually played Piggy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.235.114.187 (talk) 03:41, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah, I am removing these links. I stumbled upon the other Tom Chapin's FAQ page over here . --Valistar (talk) 05:44, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Tom Chapin and Hugh Edwards

message: Here is says that critical reception was mostly positive but according to Roger Ebert "The reviews of Brook's 1963 film version were not glowing ("Semiprofessional . . . crude and unconvincing" - Halliwell; "Patched together" - Kauffmann). But I recall it having at least a certain force, maybe because in 1963 it was still shocking that ordinary schoolkids could be killers - that they had the seeds of evil in them, and, given the opportunity and freedom from the restraints of society, the seeds would grow."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawjam (talk • contribs) 02:32, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Critical Reception
Talk:Barbara Luddy

message: Barbara's filmography is under the external links rather than the filmography section. I'm not sure how to change it, so could somebody else please fix it? Thank you. ~Reika 21:59, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone corrected that. I don't know who did it or when, but the filmography is in the right place as of tonight. Eddie Blick (talk) 03:06, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misplaced Filmography