lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Northeast-10 Conference

message: Since C.W. Post is an affiliate member, I am going to remove them from the member table and logo fields, which will make this conference page similar to other wiki NCAA conference pages. Masonpatriot 14:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  C.W. Post 

message: Ed, you are acting unilaterally in your interpretation of policy yet again.  There is no consensus in support of the actions you are taking. You are well aware of the ongoing discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Logos#Clarification_on_use_of_sports_team_logos. Johntex\talk 16:11, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: which by defacto makes the winner of the conference the Division II champion each year — Preceding unsigned comment added by BigKennyK (talk • contribs) 15:04, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo Removal

message: I removed the contention that although the NE-10 sponsors the only D-II ice hockey conference, that makes the winner "de facto national champions."  I don't believe anyone inside the league or hockey media has made this contention.  Can the author of that statement provide a source?  BigKennyK 15:04, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ice Hockey 

message: The expansion of the conference has increased the championship opportunities for countless student-athletes?  Really?  I was not a math major, but I would think it would be really easy to count the number of student-athletes now given championship opportunities.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shortynj (talk • contribs) 13:53, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Countless opportunities 

message: What is the Presidents Cup, can someone add information related to what it is and how its won?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:6C1:380:64A0:C52C:2DE8:F59F:3AA6 (talk) 21:32, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  President's Cup
Talk:Howard Schultz

message: There is currently a notice that it reads like an advertisement. I am not sure if it is or not, but at the least I concur that the article seems strange. It instantly jumps to Starbucks from the get go, but I think this should be at a LATER point; first introduce the person briefly. Don't open with such a huge jump-to, in particular right at 2008. The structure seems sooooo weird ... why is 2008 such an important part of this wikipedia article? Who wrote it? How did it look before that? My recommendation is to make the intro much shorter; and if relevant parts are to be retained, then put them into subparts that are, ideally, as objective and neutral as possible. Mentioning facts is ok, but they should be arranged as if someone NEUTRAL wrote them. Right now this article is simply weird ... I am not even sure if it is an advertisement, but the structure of it is very unusual. It would be best if wikipedia could have a general format for all people, e. g. not make the intro too long for one part. 2A02:8388:1604:F600:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F (talk) 17:42, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange structure of the article
Talk:Pyridoxal-phosphate

message: * Is thus a cofactor or a co-enzyme?? It's organic so shouldn't it be a co-enzyme
:* coenzymes are organic, cofactors are not.
::* I've chanded it to coenzyme. CopperKettle 17:45, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change cofactor -> [[coenzyme]] 

message: I've read that there are several. Maybe there should be a subcategory "PLP-dependent enzymes" under the "Enzymes" category? Or even a page: PLP-dependent enzymes? CopperKettle 17:56, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I agree. I'll see if I can mock up some generic mechanism diagrams for decarboxylation and transamination reactions with PLP.  It'll make it a lot clearer.  This is a well studied and important coenzyme, and there should be much more on it here. Zoffoperskof 03:23, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  PLP-dependent enzymes
Talk:Ralph Robinson (humanist)

message: This page does not require Clean-up because some of it is written in Renaissance English.
I would say that it does for other reasons. --ThreadbareSock 04:46, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up 

message: To move parts to WikiSource, there should be some evidence of the work, its author, and the licence.  There would also be the expectation that the work could standalone or be a distinct part of a larger work. -- billinghurst (talk) 16:55, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to move to WikiSource 

message: Robinson translated the work 'at the procurement and earnest request of George Tadlowe', cf. J.H. Lupton 'The Utopia of Sir Thomas More' (1895) p. 13.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pamour (talk • contribs) 15:29, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  George Tadlowe
Talk:Le ranch de Maria / Tu peux tout faire de moi / Quand on n'a que l'amour / Tu n'as pas très bon caractère

message: I declare this to be the worst article name ever. --Xyzzyplugh 14:30, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded... DWaterson 00:15, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Merchant seaman

message: Ok, why make a disambiguation page?  Well I was linking merchant seaman in a WWII story and hoped to go straight to the Merchant Navy.  Instead I was redirected to Merchant Marine.  I' d never heard that term before so I thought a disambiguation page would at least let folks know there are two terms for this kind of shipping.  
Hakluyt bean 14:30, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hannibal and St. Joseph Railroad

message: I never understand why Wiki talk pages aren't utilized & read more.  In any event:
Excellent start, I think.  But much more work needed.  E.g.:
1. We're told the year of the subsidiary event of when the first Pony Express letter was carried, but when did service on the Hannibal & St. Jo itself open end-to-end?
2. The 1860 map is excellent.  But give us a later map too, showing the Cameron–K.C. line; the K.C., St. Joseph & Council Bluffs; etc.  And am I wrong that that little segment from Palmyra to Quincy, all-important to the Burlington, was added only after the circuitous segment from Hannibal to Palmyra was built?
3. In section "Post offices on wheels," 2nd para., 1st sentence:
a. Don't start a paragraph by saying 'the railroad'. Which railroad?
b. As I once saw Darth Vader on TV, on stage with Wolfman Jack who was trying to introduce Alice Cooper, dangling the Wolfman by his throat off the ground, asking, "What is an Alice Cooper?": I'm a layman. What is a 'cutoff'?
4. The men who pushed the K.C.–Cameron line are identified, but not the Boston financiers behind the article's lead subject, the Hannibal & St. Joseph.  I mean, at least tell us a bit about James F. Joy.
Etc.
Jimlue (talk) 00:11, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: More
Talk:Brigade 2506

message: this and all related military/government articles need to include discussion of the legallity and constitutionality of said actions.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.14.223.232 (talk • contribs) 17:54, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One of the biggest drug dealers all over the world.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.3.224.9 (talk • contribs) 11:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I've restored the two comments. The second isn't particularly helpful, but the first is a legitimate request for article improvement. - Location (talk) 01:06, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I find the explanation concerning the name of the Brigade unconvincing. Given that Fidel Castro's revolutionary endeavour was known as the 26th of July Movement, which would be abreviated as 07/26 according to U.S. usage, and as 26/07  according to spanish usage, it seems to me that Brigade 2506 could have been named in reference to that date (2607) with the implication that the aim was to go back in time to the good old days of the Batista regime. Thus, the fact that the membership number of Carlos (Carlyle) Rafael Santana Estevez happened to be 2506 would have been nothing more than a fortunate coincidence for the leaders of the counter-revolutionary movement. This is just a theory of mine that popped up upon stumbling upon this article. Does any one else share this view? Am I the first to propose such a theory? Oclupak (talk) 08:23, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of the Brigade

message: I don't see how the term "terrorist" would fit this group.  The "bay of pigs" invasion was a military invasion against the government of Cuba.  As for as I unerstand they have never attacked civilians. So I don't think terrorist is a good term for them. Perhaps someone has more info to show me the light. Thanks Callelinea (talk) 16:41, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Terrorist

message: First off, the article should have mention of what became of some 2506 veterans -- Mas Canosa went on to be a powerful political force, Posada Carriles became a terrorist, Felix Rodriguez became a CIA man who received many awards (though his career was mired in some controversy at the time of Iran Contra), etc. Also, it's been documented that the name "Brigade 2506" was resurrected a few times by groups of paramilitaries in Miami who had been involved with the invasion and continued to be active as militants. Wclark2052 (talk) 20:27, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  article deserves mention of later activities of group's members and re-use of group's name
Talk:Kawanabe Kyōsai

message: Is this the same person as Kawanabe Kyosai (Gyosai)? I see that there is no Wikipedia article under Kawanabe Kyosai; I have never heard of Shofu, though the dates, painting style, and biography sound quite similar if not identical. LordAmeth 14:41, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kawanabe?

message: While flavorful, the comment about his "eccentric behavior and high-flying imagination" isn't exactly encyclopedic. Can you quote this from somewhere? LordAmeth 13:58, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: you're right, although attributes like "eccentric" (奇矯) and "rebellious" (反骨) are almost "standard" epithets applied to him. I'll try to look for some significant source...--K.C. Tang 06:53, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Beautiful, beautiful. Thank you. Sorry to be a bother. LordAmeth 14:29, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening sentence
Talk:Domitian's Dacian War

message: Can anyone provide a quote for the battle of 87 AD being at Tapae? I accept that Fuscus lost a battle in Dacia with Legion V (Philip Matyszak, The Enemies of Rome, p. 217) but to my knowledge there is no record of where this battle took place exactly. What indication is there that it took place at Tapae??? - PocklingtonDan 12:29, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Tactius says only "The news came in, the loss of all those armies in Moesia and Dacia" (Tacitus, Agricola, 41). Unless someone can provide a cite I will move the "battle of 87" contents to Fuscus Campaign in Dacia or similar, I do not believe it belongs here - PocklingtonDan 12:31, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm currently researching this and related questions, and will be resolving this by weeks end. I've located some good pdf sources on line, and will be using JSTOR to pin things down, including the appropriate names used by classical studies experts. Some developments on that already, such as Tapae is a mountain pass, where I'd thought it a strong point/fortress. Or perhaps is/was both. Cheers! // FrankB 22:21, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Believe this article is factually incorrect 

message: I have altered this in the text, as it appears to be a typo (either in source or in preparing the article) for IIII Flavia.  The III Flavia appears to be a later legion while the IV Flavia Felix was stationed in Upper Moesia at this time, according to its wikipedia entry Monstrelet (talk) 09:32, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed a typo on my own part. Many thanks!--Dipa1965 (talk) 10:14, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legio III Flavia
Talk:Arrayer

message: As the text is virtually identical, merge.  Will bring the information into two task force areas.  Recommend the merged article be Commission of Array, with redirect from Arrayer.  There is a huge amount more information on medieval practice which needs to be incorporated to get even to start class, though Monstrelet (talk) 13:11, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree merge this article into Commission of Array as Commission of Array is much the more common term in civil war writings. If however there is a significant amount of information that relates to the middle-ages that is usually under the term Arrayer then the two should be kept separate.  -- PBS (talk) 10:32, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Free State–Basotho Wars

message: after colonization 41.115.74.253 (talk) 23:31, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  ministers of Qwaqwa 

message: merge the Freestate- Basotho wars with moshoeshoe and page. EmkayPd (talk) 08:42, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moshoeshoe
Talk:Java War

message: A very nice start, but not quite long enough to warrant B-class in my opinion. In point of fact, it even has a whole bunch of stub tags on it. Expansion is needed, if possible. LordAmeth 21:11, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MILHIST Assessment

message: Who is Prince Magelang? Is he another name of Prince Diponegoro? I added  because the number of casualties in the infobox contradicts with the number in the texts. Peace. --Nielswik(talk) 05:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: re the contradiction tags, I've now reconciled the article and the info box - the problem now being that the ranges are unreferenced and so wide as to be essentially useless - we need some reliable sources. Merbabu 13:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: My changes
Talk:Grand Bahama

message: There are duplicate links for two of the same Grand Bahama websites.
One of them has replaced our links.
Http://grand-bahamas.com 
Joelle (JoelleH)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.58.6.164 (talk) 01:35, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference Links 

message: In 2001, the resort was reopened as Old Bahama Bay Resort & Yacht Harbour.
* removed link Brian W. Schaller (talk) 22:01, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  comercialink=k? 

message: You guys don't make it all that easy to correct mistakes ... or maybe it's dumb old me.  The satellite picture of Grand Bahama, on the main 'Grand Bahama' page, is upside down, i.e. the north side of the island points to the south, (or bottom of the page). The south side of the island points to the north, (or top of the page). The picture needs to be rotated through 180 degrees, in other words.
Please could someone correct this?
Thank you.
Tim Hendley,
The satellite photo of Grand Bahama Island, on the main 'Grand Bahama' page is upside down. The north side of the island is pointing to the south (or to the bottom of the page) while the south side of the island is pointing north (or to the top of the page. In other words, the photo needs to be rotated though 180 degrees.
I would correct it myself but you guys do not make it all that easy ... or maybe it is dumb old me!
Thank you.
Tim Hendley (nedseagoon)--Nedseagoon 15:01, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The caption does say that the photo (taken from space) is looking to the southwest. While it would be technically possible to rotate the image 180° and re-upload it to Commons, that would, in some sense, misrepresent the image. Personally, I think it is fine as is, as long as the caption makes its orientation clear. - Donald Albury 16:47, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grand Bahama Island photo. 

message: I added more information about Grand Bahama. I added a small detail to the lead section, as well as added new sections on the climate and wildlife of the island. I also added more to the economy section because all It talked about before was the tourism, but there are other things that contribute to the economy.
Keehan19 (talk) 16:53, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Added information

message: Do It! First landfall in grand big boy bahama. Need
Dermato1 16:55, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Hurricane Dorian]] Info 

message: What is the background of the grid of roads cutting through the forests of near the half of the island? Do they plan to built suburban settlements there (which would more than double the inhabitated area)? See https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/26.6350/-78.4896 --87.128.77.121 (talk) 11:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I, for one, do not know. If someone finds reliable sources about the clearances, they can add information about the clearances to the article, citing those sources. Donald Albury 16:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large-scale deforestation
Talk:Riccati equation

message: I reverted the reduction to an ODE, as it seemed wrong, and I could not prove the claims on my own.  DRLB 14:46, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Why is the phrasing 'in the narrowest sense' used in the introduction? It is true that the terminology might be used for further generalizations, for which the reader might need to be warned, but according to my textbook (I think also Ince) this interpretation is already the generalized Riccati equation with the 'actual' Riccati equation being
: y'(x) + a \, y^2(x) = b \, x^n 
granted my sources are rather old textbooks and the terminology could have adjusted to the fact that the 'original' Riccati equation is typically a historical sidenote but still saying this is the definition'in the narrowest sense' does not seem very accurate  Virtual Neutrino (talk) 08:55, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  terminology Riccati equation
Talk:Frederick H. Billings

message: I've made numerous updates over the last few days. I'm sure it's not a start class article anymore, but I don't want to be in the position of rating my own work. Can someone else review the article and give it a new rating?
Thanks,
Billmckern (talk) 22:30, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Can someone reevaluate this article
Talk:List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom by longevity

message: Might it be better to list the Prime Ministers by the names they used in office, rather than their subsequent hereditary titles?  More people will be familiar with "Harold Macmillan" than with "The Earl of Stockton", for example.  Tevildo 15:44, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. —Nightstallion (?) 13:14, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  I've taken out all the "Sirs", even though a few (Sir Robert Peel, Sir Alec Douglas-Home) might go back in without difficulty. Tevildo 19:00, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If the article lists PMs by 'the names they used in office' then I suggest that it should refer to the Marquess of Salisbury rather than Robert Cecil, the Earl of Rosebery rather than Archibald Primrose etc.  Compare List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom.Alekksandr (talk) 23:27, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names? 

message: when does this list start?,- clarification- I don't see any names from the 1600's and it would be nice to have a specific date--69.134.147.160 (talk) 03:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Historians generally regard Robert Walpole, who became head of government in 1721, as the "First" Prime Minister. I will add an explanation of this to the lead in the next few days. Road Wizard (talk) 07:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Start date

message: I think...
*Henry Pelham should have 3,833 not 3,844 days due to conversion to the Gregorian calendar.
*David Lloyd George should have 2,142 not 2,145 as he resigned 19 October not rather than 22 October.
*Edward Smith-Stanley should have 1,381 days as some of the end of term dates are wrong.
*Charles Grey should have 1,325 not 1,332 as he resigned on 9th, not 16th.
*Alec Douglas-Home was appointed on Saturday 19 October 1963, not Friday 18 (Mac resigned) so should have 363 not 364
*Andrew Bonar Law resigned on 20th May not 22nd so 209 not 211 days (number10.gov says 209)
Jw6aa (talk) 12:13, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Days in office 

message: It would be cool if we could organize by the start or end date of terms. Couldn't this be done if we started out with the years instead of days? Ranze (talk) 22:35, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Table improvement

message: Where did you get the precise birthdate for Spencer Compton from? It is uncited, not given in the DNB or History of Parliament (the latter of which placed his birth year as circa 1674), and it seems to be unknown to the writers of his Wikipedia biography (calling the year circa 1673).Cloptonson (talk) 21:46, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Lord Wilmington's birthdate
Talk:Green waste

message: I removed the link Japanese knotweed.  Correct me if I've missed something, but it seems to me that any plant can be treated as green waste.  We don't want to list them all, do we? Spiel496 (talk) 03:32, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese knotweed

message: Instead of giving more specifics about what plants can be treated as green waste, more information could be added concerning the collection of green waste,  green waste's role in production of biofuel, and its impact on the environment. It might also be helpful to include more information about how "green waste" differs from traditional trash and wastes. The article could also be improved by supplementing it with information about how science is improving or affecting green waste. Overall, the article needs more information about green waste as a topic and its implications for the environment.Ahandley (talk) 20:16, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Evaluation

message: Noble, R.; Coventry, E. (2005). Suppression of soil-borne plant diseases with composts: A review, Biocontrol Science and Technology, 15:1, 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583150400015904
Jouraiphy, A.; Amir, S.; El Gharous, M.; Revel, J.; Hafidi, M. (2005). Chemical and spectroscopic analysis of organic matter transformation during composting of sewage sludge and green plant waste. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 56(2), 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2005.06.002
Smith, S. (2009). A critical review of the bioavailability and impacts of heavy metals in municipal solid waste composts compared to sewage sludge. Environment International, 35(1), 142-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2008.06.009
Williams, I.; Kelly, J. (2003). Green waste collection and the public's recycling behaviour in the Borough of Wyre, England. Resources, Conservation, and Recycling, 38(2), 139-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2008.06.009
Belyaeva, O.; Haynes, R. (2009). Chemical, microbial and physical properties of manufactured soils produced by co-composting municipal green waste with coal fly ash. Bioresource Technology, 100(21), 5203-5209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.05.032Ahandley (talk) 22:57, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Bibliography
Talk:Herman Haupt

message: I have failed in a (brief) Google search to find a reference to this Society or to any successor. Sometimes, US sources mis-name foreign organisations, so any thoughts? For any UK organisation to be prefixed "Royal" implies a high level of impact and perhaps royal involvement, so this may be a bogus reference, despite the NIE reference. Folks at 137 (talk) 08:50, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Royal Polytechnic Society" of Great Britain 

message: I cleaned this article somewhat today, but can find no support for him building railroads in Mississippi circa 1851 as in the text. It's not in the International Encyclopedia nearly plagarized according to this talk page, nor Appleton's nor the Civil War railroading picturebook I found in a library. But it is interesting if that led to his preference for black construction crews per the picturebook. Perhaps I shouldn't have added his publications into the text, but do note that he mentions his pipeline experience in his memoirs (that I don't have time to read tonight).Jweaver28 (talk) 02:45, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mississippi Railroad?