lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Studio art

message: I have created this headings so people can discuss how to improve this article. I have also moved the {verify} template to the article, which is where all templates concerning an article should be placed. 66.229.182.113 15:51, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Improving this article

message: Yes this article does need sorting. Anyone can have a studio but studio arts is something else. Afaik, "studio arts" originally referred to the classical divisions of fine art such as sculpture, painting and printmaking (and architecture) and are related to the "atelier system" where a master took on apprentices and often developed a school of followers, and where successful artists had patrons and clients, making it possible to have a space exclusively to produce work. Studio arts is the classic term for artists working in this way and to groups of artists who formed art movements. Another term for SA is Visual Arts or plastic arts where an artist materially creates unique art pieces as part of their practice, by hand and with low technology, for collection, for the museum and for viewing in galleries or "open studio" times. These practices are the opposite of manufactured mass-produced objects.
I doubt that it has anything to do with legitimacy or other of the amateur or professional - the bohemian lifestyle stereotype applied to artists. writers, poets, designers etc (see Bloomsbury group and Pre-Raphaelites) figured as outsider to mainstream society. Haven't time to dig out refs at this point, but just pointing out some limits & pov in the article. Manytexts (talk) 05:00, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  definition
Talk:List of Austrian Airlines destinations

message: Colleagues, if Kosovo was classified anywhere in Wiki as an independent and sovereign state (indicated as this in Austrian destinations)? Thanx. --Dimitree (talk) 17:52, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, Dimitree. There is a consensus to use the word Kosovo with a footnote describing it's political status. Thank you. kedadial 18:11, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: So if it is enough to put Kosovo (Pristina) as a state among other destinations? For sure, there is so called "Republic of China", but this Republic (Taiwan) was a memeber of UN. Kosovo -never. Kosovo is still a part of Serbia. I think it is better to eliminate Kosovo from AUA Destinations' list and to put Pristina under Serbia. Thank you. --Dimitree (talk) 19:07, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Destination Pristina 

message: I like to know when will Austrian Airlines be flying to Los Angeles. I read an article online and it stated that Los Angeles will be added on the destination list by 2013. If Los Angeles can be changed from Terminated to Future that will be great. Thank you. --Zebra04 (talk) 15:43, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The source you provided states that the airline "plans" to start service to LAX but there is no firm date provided. LAX can't be a future destination until Austrian Airlines confirms that they will fly there and there is an official press release from the airline itself. Right now, its just mear speculation. Snoozlepet (talk) 05:05, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Destination Los Angeles 

message: What about the charter destinations in the mediterranean countries (Greece, Spain etc)? Shouldn't those destinations be also listed? --84.113.224.54 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 18:21, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless they are operating on a daily seasonal basis then yes but if they are not then it is not. Snoozlepet (talk) 05:09, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Seasonal destinations
Talk:Starship Troopers (board wargame)

message: I will fact check it, and provide original photography Real Soon Now.  :-)--Baylink 04:54, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have this game 

message: I think it can be made clearer that the movie version is a completely new game, not simply
a redesign. I think about the only thing they have in common is the fact both use hexmaps for
movement.
Lifelike 22:21, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie version
Talk:Peter W. Barlow

message: W. C. Copperthwaite was Greathead's pupil and wrote a definitive exposition on each of the above named engineers' contributions to tunnelling shield design published in 1906 at New York. A copy of which is available from the Institution of Civil Engineers in London.
A long controversy has raged over who invented the cylindrical shield since 1869, making it a bicentennial-long conjecture. It is flat that Barlow came up with the idea first but never built it. Whilst it has been proven that Greathead designed, patented and built the first cylindrical tunnelling shield, it was not of Barlow's design or input. This became clear to me on 10 July 2018 when I spoke to the librarian at the institution of Civil Engineers in London who clarified the facts according to the minutes of a meeting of the engineers on 19 November 1895 in which the chairman asked Greathead of he was aware that the late Barlow had had a provisional patent that closely resembled Greathead's patented idea. It turned out that Greathead had no idea of the 1868 provisional patent or of the 1864 patent of his school master. I have a substantial collection of notes and the minutes of that meeting which I am collating. Hopefully ICE will allow this copyright material to be partially shown to clarify the evidence of who built the first cylindrical shield. Simultaneously, Alfred Ely Beach designed a shield of his own and built it in New York around the same time as Greathead built his in London. Beach's design was very similar to Barlow's 1864 patent. For historical accuracy, there was never a Barlow-Greathead shield since they came up with their own patents meaning differently designed enough to warrant not being the same.  Ashattock (talk) 01:08, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barlow-Greathead-Beach shield design controversy
Talk:Maurice Macmillan

message: "Maurice Macmillan, Viscount Macmillan of Ovenden": his name and courtesy title for a month.  It cannot be justified as an article title. --Henrygb 08:57, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page title

message: I have heard that Macmillan's career was blighted by alcohol. Should this be mentioned? Ausseagull (talk) 09:32, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Alcohol

message: In the titles section I've changed the honourable to Mr. MPs aren't 'the honourable' though as the article rightly says, he became Rt.Hon. when he joined the privy council in 1972.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.173.223.45 (talk) 10:24, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  not honourable 

message: Lots of public domain sources about drug misuse in the family.  It is very sad, but surely the fact that three children blighted by drug use, should also be mention in Wikipedia and sourced? 88.97.108.45 (talk) 12:09, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of drug issues in profile?  Seems quite an omission.
Talk:The Old Bull and Bush

message: I live in this area, would a picture of the front of the pub suffice?
Onlyabititalian 18:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: 1 link removed - B/W Film footage - No indication from clip informration/ uploader profile that uploder has rights to footage concerned, or is linked to the production entities responsible for it. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:09, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  You tube link removal. 

message: Does this pub have any connection to "the Old Bull & Bush" mentioned in Cats? Or is it a pure coincidence?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.255.173.237 (talk) 12:29, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Growltiger 
Talk:The Wish List (novel)

message: I disagree completely with this being classified as a children's book. I'd be curious to how many parents of children under ten would let their child read this, much less expect them to understand the concepts provided in the book. The book also has some scenes in it that may be considered innapropriate for a younger audience. I'd be glad to hear your opinions on this.
Gwickwire (talk) 01:35, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children's Book? 

message: How do you pronounce 'Lowrie'? Is in pronounced 'Laurie', or 'Laa-wrie'? HyperHobbes 15:39, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded. There's many ideas and principles in the book that children would most definitely not understand –-  kungming·2 (Talk) 05:10, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: I can't really agree that God would be a minor character in the book, seeing as he never appears, and never is mentioned.
213.65.81.4 (talk) 14:37, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor character?
Talk:Joan of Kent

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 14:35, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Consensus having been reached on the move proposed below, I have moved the article accordingly. Deb 22:13, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Not sure when this was moved or by whom, but it was a bad call in my opinion.  Joan's title as Countess of Kent was secondary to her title of Princess of Wales.  (She was also Countess of Salisbury for a time.)  She is invariably known as Joan of Kent, and that is where most of the links point.  I propose to move her back. Deb 15:45, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, she's most often known as the Fair Maid of Kent (so capped, even in running text); but if no-one else fancies that, Joan of Kent is the second best choice. Septentrionalis 21:45, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

text: John Kenney moved her in June. The current name follows the naming guidelines for hereditary peers (since Joan was Countess of Kent in her own right). Choess 22:24, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Joan, Countess of Kent -> Joan of Kent

message: The phrase: 'but the damage was done' does not seem appropriate at all.  Is the suggestion seriously that her death was caused by Richard II's refusal to pardon his brother?
Also: 'but the violent climax of the popular movement for reform reduced the feisty Joan to a state of terror, while leaving the King with an improved reputation' is really vague, and filled with loaded terms, which are not supported with any citations.  It seems to conflate the Peasant's Revolt with Lollardy, despite these being two different things completely.  Unless the writer was thinking of some 'violent climax' to Lollardy?  The printing of the Wyclif Bible?  The persecution of Lollards came well after Joan's death.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by NathanielTapley (talk • contribs) 03:13, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The latter statement is not quite correct, since Wycliffe pre-deceased Joan and he was certainly persecuted. Deb (talk) 11:47, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor points 

message: It looks like she’s holding a Cornish pasty in this picture. Do we know for sure what she’s holding and what it symbolises (if anything?) Overlordnat1 (talk) 23:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the photo of? 

message: Under Thomas Holland another daughter is listed named Maud: Maud Holland 98.198.211.216 (talk) 14:46, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Daughter Maud
Talk:Katja Kipping

message: information translated from http://www.linksfraktion.de/mdb/abisz/index.htm.
could a german speaker please verify what is said here in comparison to what is said by entering info for katja kipping into Alta Vista Bable Fish? I cannot be sure, as Bablefish can be a bit weird.
----
From http://www.katja-kipping.de:
1996 - Freiwilliges Soziales Jahr in Russland (Gatschina)
1997-2003 Magisterstudium der Slavistik/Amerikanistik/Reschtswissenschaft an der TU Dresden
I think thats a gap year in Russia, followed by university study in something I can't translate.. Secretlondon 22:20, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Home

message: "the grammar school in Leith" has been changed to "the Leith Grammar School" - was there ever such a school? The recent incarnation was called Leith Academy, but High school is an equally common Scottish equivalent of the English grammar school, which Britannica may have been using as a type of school rather than the name of the school...dave souza 16:01, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Leith Grammar School?
Talk:Rap opera

message: Obviously, whoever wrote this article doesn't understand the difference between "rap" and R&B. Every black modern musician on urban radio is NOT a rapper. Furthermore, a song/album can't be a "rap opera" if no one is actually rapping and the song is actually an R&B song. --FuriousFreddy 19:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Does it matter? This genre terminology seems exclusive to Wikipedia anyway, Trapped in the closest is the only notable example, seeing as the contributors of this stub of an article have completely abandoned the use of resources we might as well throw out the rest of the Wikipedia structure. Also no one mentioned race smart one, R. Kelly is acknowledged as a rapper and the less than notable singer on the track continues his career by featuring himself on rap tracks. 72.145.199.31 (talk) 00:53, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Trapped in the Closet" "Contagious"??
Talk:Trellick Tower

message: "However the brutalist architecture is now out of style and the building is still regarded by some Londoners as one of the ugliest in the city." - removed from the article as it's a POV without a source. Do we need "and critics of modern architecture think it's hideous!" on every article on a modern building? Secretlondon 16:06, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There is pov praise too: "iconic". What's the source for that? This building is loathed and the article should refer to that. Not to do so is manifestly biased. The articles about modern buidlings should not be controlled by modernists. Bhoeble 20:10, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brutalist architecture

message: This page states 217 - but the housingprototypes link says 317 - Anyone know which is correct?
Definitely 217 - I've delivered leaflets to all of them! Docben 16:41, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many flats? 

message: hejka, a mówi ktoś tu po polsku? xD  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.238.238.209 (talk) 17:11, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Konstantynopolitańczykiewiczówianeczanka 

message: Goldfinger designed the building to have one but it was removed for cost reasons. When the new tenants association took over it was 
finally introduced. Slight difference to the way the article has it. 16:58, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concierge 

message: I removed the references. I don't believe they have any affect on the original material and are simply miscellaneous information. The fact that a building was seen in a music video is a trivial fact. The same goes for television shows.  The section does not suggest removing trivia but it also does not suggest putting it there in the first place. The style manual does say to avoid these kinds of lists in the first place. TurtleMelody (talk) 15:54, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Pop Culture

message: "local authorities were beginning to realise the social problems they caused"
I would suggest this is more complex than to say the buildings themselves caused the social problems. Seems like an opinion rather than a fact. No citation in either case.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.111.225.8 (talk) 18:15, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion rather than fact on 'cause' of social problems 

message: This edit claims the text is "unsourced", but the next source along, citing The Guardian piece includes "". It's not pleasant, but it is sourced. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, that's weird. I removed it because when I checked the Guardian link it came back as a 404, so I took it out. Maybe the Guardian site was misbehaving. Happy it's back. GedUK  09:03, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Tower of Terror" 

message: This article needs to explain who Trellick was. There is no mention of why it is named what it is.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:C409:DA00:8D86:2C31:DC17:3E0C (talk) 16:19, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a source that says why? I haven't been able to find one. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:22, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:First responder

message: Since this page was converted into a disambiguation page that clearly runs afoul of WP:DABCONCEPT (listing types of first responders rather than unrelated concepts like books, films, and geographic locations sharing the title "First responder"), I have de-disambiguated it. A redirect does not work where there are multiple related possibilities, with no explanation of how they relate to one another. It is unclear from reviewing the articles whether being "certified" is a prerequisite to being considered a "first responder" in all jurisdictions where the concept of a "first responder" exists. bd2412 T 13:20, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:DABCONCEPT]] de-disambiguation
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Rktect/Proposed decision

message: Rktect moves 
: 1.) That the characterization of writing as being "original research" and "pseudo science" after it has been cited as taken from a source be considered a personal attack.
: 2.) That the submission of a contribution for a vfd as being "original research" and "pseudo science" after it has been cited as taken from a source be considered a personal attack.
: 3.) That the soliciitation of actions by others against a contributor on grounds of "original research" and "pseudo science" after said contribution has been cited as taken from a source be considered a personal attack
: 4.) That the reversion of a contribution on grounds of it being "original research" and "pseudo science" after it has been cited as taken from a source be considered a personal attack.
: 5.) That the repeated removal of material from Wikipedia as part of a personal attack be considered a bad faith action against the interests of Wikipedia.
: 6.) That false statements given to justify the removal of Wikification, content and references be considered a personal attack. Rktect 16:24, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:The Unknown Soldier (novel)

message: A "translation" of "The Unknown Soldier" into English was published in 1957, but English-language readers should not rely on it for an accurate idea of the book's contents (or style, as I found already in a beginning Finnish language class). See http://www2.helsinginsanomat.fi/english/archive/news.asp?id=20011106IE15
--Bront 25 Sep. 2005 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.88.86.243 (talk) 16:23, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't that effectively censorship? —Quirk 16:40, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Maybe wording should be uncopy-edited or similar. I think that this cencoring thing was only a marketing trick for "Sotaromaani". --Ekeb 07:04, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation 

message: I suggest a separate article for the novel and one for each of the film versions. Her Pegship 05:33, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. The film articles are here and here. –Mysid 09:34, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split suggestion 

message: This article showers the book with praise through and through. I don't know enough about the book to be able to fix the article but someone who is familiar should.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.87.223.123 (talk) 17:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV? 

message: Anyone? I might do one for the 1955 film but I really have to sit down with it again before I do. --TheHande (talk) 18:21, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot section?
Talk:Category (philosophy)

message: --Ludvikus 01:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Mostlyharmless 23:24, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Usefulness of Wikipedia

message: --Ludvikus 01:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why isn't this and Category of being the same article? /Popperipopp 12:30, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One reason is that the above is merely a single category. --Ludvikus 01:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Category of being]]

message: The plural is the correct usage. --Ludvikus 01:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On reflection I think you're right. But then this article ought to be at Categories (philosophy) in my opinion, with Categories redirecting to Category, since just "Categories" is ambiguous. Hairy Dude 13:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: With with your support, I've just made the Bold Wiki move. --Ludvikus 16:52, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Categories]]
Talk:Economy of Eritrea

message: After some work on this page and futher checks, who agrees we remove the cleanup tag?
ant_ie 16:55, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove Cleanup tag? 

message: Hello everyone, I am working for the International Trade Centre (ITC). I would like to propose the addition of an external link that could lead directly to the specific country’s trade data held by ITC. I would like you to consider this link under the WP:ELYES #3 prescriptions. Moreover, the reliability and the pertinence of this link can be supported by the following facts 
1) ITC is part of the United Nations
2) No registration is required
3) Trade data (imports/exports) are regularly updated
4) The link gives direct access to the trade database of the specific country
5) The addition of reliable trade data to the Economy section of the country could provide an appropriate contribution to the information therein contained. 
Thank you for your attention.Divoc (talk) 08:43, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ITC external link on trade data 
Talk:Horace François Bastien Sébastiani de La Porta

message: He commissioned the architect Visconti to build his tower ~ Tuda20232 (talk) 10:38, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  His Corsican residence was Chateau Di Tuda at Olmetta Di Tuda ~
Talk:Côte de Beaune

message: Vineyard image: I took this from the Burgundy wine article. I hope this is within the new picture uploading policy. (RJP 16:58, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's not perfect, but there's now a good basic structure in place.  Obviously all those red links to the main village appellations need to be created, but it makes a convenient 'to do' list.  At this stage I don't think we need separate articles for every Grand Cru, they can be covered by the village articles in the main.  It's really hard keeping to a NPOV when you try to do even basic descriptions of the differences in styles between the different communes, but I've tried to keep it general, and it's the sort of thing that could be referenced by citations to specific page numbers in Coates or Jancis. FlagSteward 15:26, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite