Talk:RBI

message: Just a quick glance at the What links here, of about 150 links to this page, none of them appear to be anything but Runs batted in.  Does anyone think this should be a disambig or redirect right to the main article? Metros232 12:36, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted your cut and paste move. Please refer to Wikipedia:Requested moves for more information on how to proceed. Ewlyahoocom 08:17, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright. Thanks. --Grubb 18:03, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A disambig? 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support - I agree with this one since there a so many potential meanings for "RBI" and I don't feel the baseball term is the principal one. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) 20:14, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I'm not going to relist the move for the moment, and I take the point above that baseball fans are probably a majority in Wikipedia. But surely, that's not the issue.
Is it really suggested that an obscure baseball term is the primary meaning? http://data3.blog.de/media/132/2333132_da3e2cd0e8_m.jpg gives the logo for Radio Berlin International. Most Germans speak English. English Wikipedia caters for all English speakers, not just native speakers. In India, of course, RBI means Reserve Bank of India. Fewer Indians speak English proportionately than Germans, but there are a lot of Indians. Few of them would have any idea what run batted in meant, or even even recognise it as a well-formed English phrase. Andrewa (talk) 02:01, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was no consensus for move. Per the discussion, the baseball term is put forward as the primary topic by the opposers and since no one provided any research to back up that basis for opposition, I note that this search verses this search supports that contention.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:48, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: More on the move

message: How many people outside US even know of baseball? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:20, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Lots. See History of baseball outside the United States, Baseball in Cuba, Baseball in Japan, and Baseball in the United Kingdom. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:38, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

text: I see....4 countries...that's it..... IMO, that isn't NET Nuetrality.....it's partiality.... --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:32, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Net neutrality has no bearing on WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Similarly, although I personally don't care about the sport of cricket and would (if it were just up to me) choose the insect for the primary topic of Cricket, consensus has it that the sport (that doesn't get much play in the U.S.) is the primary topic.  Is that also partiality? -- JHunterJ (talk) 17:41, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Run Batted In 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :RBI and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 27#RBI until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 19:35, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "RBI" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]