Talk:Jeffboat

message: Since I live only 3-4 blocks away, I'm pretty much forced to have wrote this article.  Should I write a separate article for the Howard SHipyards, or include it here?  I have a pic of the old shipyards from the Baird's book, but it is just as "high-quality" as the other pics I took from that book.--Bedford 20:25, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think they were distinct businesses, so I would say they each deserve an article. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 21:08, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate article for Howard Shipyards?

message: According to http://www.aclines.com/JB/Jb_about.asp, the history behind Jeffboat does not seem to match what is in this article.  Will have to do some more research and find better info.
Supersquid 09:47, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Inconsistancies

message: I have worked at jeffboat as a machinist for a number of years, and was involved in the "wildcat", and subsequent labour actions, including the recent decert campaign: The "labour update" was mine, written before I had a login. My question is this: Why was my text edited? All "facts" were supported by independent McMedia articles (Courier-Journal and the local Jeff paper); and, as well, the final vote tally was certified by the NLRB (649-190 to retain local 89). Is the person responsible for "editing" some sort of management stooge? Perhaps a salaried or supervisory employee at Jeffboat, or some where else? If so, why is their NPOV not challenged? I realise the importance of NPOV, but when information is supported by "outside" sources......................... Wanagi49 11:16, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did the edit. I have no connection with the company in any way; I live in Alabama, though I'm familiar with Jeffboat having lived in the area for many years. I removed the old section because I believe it was heavily slanted pro-union and anti-management, which is a definite NPOV problem, and I could not find the source of the certified vote results. I stand by your right to back your union, but you must remember that Wikipedia prides itself in presenting a neutral point of view, so you must keep any editorializing to a minimum. (Believe me, I have to police myself on that many times.) If you can find a source article from the C-J or the J-ville paper (or the NLRB itself) with the results, please include a footnote/reference to the web page, and all will be well. I remind you also of this note which you will find at the bottom of the page every time you edit anything in Wikipedia: If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it. Realkyhick 04:40, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "belly of the beast" 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Jeffboat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070928224820/http://www.lifeatjeffboat.com/ to http://www.lifeatjeffboat.com
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:29, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have started a list of ships built at the Jeffersonville Shipyards. I am listing all of the steamers I can find from Way's Packet Directory, 18481994. I completed all of the ships with names starting with the letter "A" from this book. It would be interesting to see just how many ships were produced there. Oldsanfelipe (talk) 00:40, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: List of ships