Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-06-06/In the news

message: ::Suggested Additions
::#Aussie overtaken in cat and mouse game, Daily Telegraph (Sydney, Australia), May 2, 2005
:::Directs readers to Felix the Cat as web resource with additional info.
::#Media: Dispatches: Online journalism: News of the world wide web, The Guardian (London) - Final Edition, May 2, 2005
:::Article devoted to Wikinews - Highlights: " From the makers of Wikipedia - the online encyclopaedia that allows anyone to edit and update entries - comes Wikinews..." "...Wikinews's international network of contributors could potentially compete with the news heavyweights, such as Associated Press."  "And, before we take Wikinews too seriously, take this example of "original" reporting on the site last week: 'I watched the take-off live on BBC News 24. Not a whole lot to say.'"
::Now you know, Christian Science Monitor (Boston, MA), April 29, 2005
:::"Now you Know", a random factoid column, cites Wikipedia as a source.
::A colourful career in more ways than one, Daily Telegraph (Sydney, Australia), April 27, 2005 
:::Article directs readers at the end to explore the Al Grassby page.
::Just browsing,  Times-Picayune (New Orleans), April 27, 2005 
:::"Wikipedia is an astonishing resource"
::ENVIRONMENT, SCIENCE & SPACE ; SCIENCE FACT ; A WHOLE LOTTA DATA, The Houston Chronicle, April 26, 
:::Wikipedia cited as the sole source.
::Winnipeg Sun (Manitoba), May 1, 2005 Sunday,  FINAL EDITION, LIFESTYLE; Strange But True; 
:::"ASo-called "polydactyls" may have six or more digits on either their hands or feet or both, an inherited condition, says Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia."
::Two thumbs out: Sight gags, good casting and Earth's destruction almost add up to 42,  National Post (f/k/a The Financial Post) (Canada), April 29, 2005 
:::"The guide itself (think Wikipedia.org but with more advice on pubs)" Sig: Wikipedia is no longer the resource to introduce, but in the judgement of editors - a reference point
::GETTING HITCHED,  Calgary Sun (Alberta), April 27, 2005 
:::"Douglas' concept of an all-encompassing storehouse of knowledge written by its own users predated Wikipedia, a popular online encyclopedia that recently received backing from Yahoo.
Wikipedia allows anyone online to make changes to entries but relies on a final review by a core team of about 1,000 users."
::Rowe Turns Tables on Jackson Prosecution; Bride-to-Be Search Intensifies,  CNN, SHOW: CNN LIVE TODAY 10:00 AM EST, April 29, 2005
:::"And Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia that people contribute to, has a fine site to devoted to 42 and the answer to the meaning of life." (LIVE mention)
Lotsofissues 00:30, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

message: Any idea which article Mayfield vandalized?  RickK 22:19, Jun 7, 2005 (UTC)
:The source didn't say, and I at least have no idea. Since the point of his demonstration was to show that it would be fixed by the time he came back to it, he would want his vandalism to be an easy mark. The best way to make sure of that is to edit a popular article (possibly that day's featured article) from an IP address. But this makes it harder to reconstruct after the fact. --Michael Snow 22:41, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia vandalised by Socialtext CEO

message: http://www.cumberlink.com/articles/2005/06/06/news/news05.txt says that Poison Hemlock (not the Dame's Rocket, is poisonous.  The Sentinel piece uses information from Conium. 
How does the Signpost handle corrections? -- Beland 05:04, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In most cases, The Signpost handles corrections the same way everything else on this site does; it's a wiki, so anyone who sees the mistake can fix it. I don't think this one is of a magnitude to require too much formality over it. --Michael Snow 05:17, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error