Talk:Arrest and assassination of Ngô Đình Diệm

message: Assassination implies targeted killing, and execution implies killing by authority.  This article sounds like he was killed in a moment of emotion, rather than a deliberate act.  doesn't that make the title and lede inaccurate? Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 19:59, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I fixed up the lead. The execution was widely regarded as being a hit job. Blnguyen  (bananabucket) 09:16, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TOC 

message: Why is mention of the CIA excised from the first sentence of the  Featured Article?  It is the same sentence the begins the main article, except that the phrase "CIA-backed" is edited out.  Reading the Featured Article gives the impression it was a revolt to strike a blow for freedom of religious expression by the horrified ARVN leadership.  I suppose it's too late to alter the Featured Article and this post to the talk page isn't likely to be seen by those who read the Featured Article without reading the main article, where "CIA-backed" very correctly appears in the first sentence.  Or is it too late?  Admins???
69.17.65.50 10:51, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I edited it so CIA-backed doesn't appear in the lead either. 88.191.29.92 23:41, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "CIA-backed" is edited out of the Featured Article on Main Page 2 Nov 2007 

message: since it barely has 20 references!!!!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nergaal (talk • contribs) 13:50, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I took everything from those pages of the book I quoted. If there was only one ref per para, that's because the whole para came from the two pages that I sourced and so forth. It's all inline. Blnguyen  (bananabucket) 00:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is this a FA?

message: There is already a link to 1963 South Vietnamese coup before the article. There is no need to make another link to it in the article itself. I've changed the link to go to Coup d'état and I'd appreciate it if people would just leave it alone. DonSlice 02:52, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coup d'etat 

message: I don't know where I can put it on or it is useful or not. Magnifier (talk) 22:28, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catholic Church of St. Francis Xavier 

message: Dear fellow contributors
MOSNUM no longer encourages date autoformatting, having evolved over the past year or so from the mandatory to the optional after much discussion there and elsewhere of the disadvantages of the system. Related to this, MOSNUM prescribes rules for the raw formatting, irrespective of whether or not dates are autoformatted. MOSLINK and CONTEXT are consistent with this. 
There are at least six disadvantages in using date-autoformatting, which I've capped here:
Removal has generally been met with positive responses by editors. I'm seeking feedback about this proposal to remove it from the main text (using a script) in about a week's time on a trial basis. The original input formatting would be seen by all WPians, not just the huge number of visitors; it would be plain, unobtrusive text, which would give greater prominence to the high-value links. BTW, anyone has the right to object, and my aim is not to argue against people on the issue. Tony (talk) 12:32, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to remove date-autoformatting 

message: Why is there no info on their graves? According to every magazine and newspaper accessible on the net, they were first buried in unmarked graves at the military headquarters by the airport, then moved to unmarked graves in Mac Dinh Chi cemetery in 1965, then in 1983 moved to their parents' cemetery in the province.GLY63 (talk) 03:22, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to have accurate info on their graves 

message: The article intro states that the Diems were "executed", but this implies that they had been tried, convicted, and sentenced, while none of these occurred.  Should a more accurate term be used?
--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 18:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "executed"? 

message: I was wondering whether some Catholics in Vietnam have ever considered Đình Diệm to be a kind of martyr, since he was incidentally assassinated outside a church, and that he had articulate religious views which led him to be hated by US Liberals, North Vietnamese Communists and South Vietnamese Buddhists. His assassination also coincides with the beginning of the long period of persecutions for the Vietnamese Church, which suffered greatly in the following years after the Communists gradually took over the country. ADM (talk) 12:24, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Martyr ?

message: Regarding  latest revision by user:YellowMonkey:
* The caption: "US ambassador Henry Cabot Lodge, Jr.'s apparent reluctance in helping the Ngo brothers to asylum raise eyebrows" deserves  tags. Also, the English is wrong. His reluctance may have raided eyebrows (past tense) but "raise eyebrows" is present tense. The correct grammar is: "raised eyebrows in the past," "still raises eyebrows today", and "will raise eyebrows in the future".
* Changing "kill" to "execution" is wrong. Execution redirects to capital punishment for a reason, as it's usually a legally authorized killing. In a coup, legal authorization is unclear, and in any case, judicial executions have trials, and afterwards the "authorities" doesn't try to cover them up as suicides. That suggests precisely that somebody doesn't want to take responsiblity and authority.
* The usual practice in non-BLP material (as here, since the Ngo brothers are dead) is to add  tags where you'd like to them, not simply remove material, which is rude to the previous editor. Worse still, you should know very well that the material on the life of Duong Hieu Nghia is referenced by citation in his own BLP, since you yourself added the citations! One presumes you don't think they're adequate in the BLP? If not, remove the BLP! Furthermore, the BLP assertion that Nghia "brutally tortured" anybody is not only slanderous, but unencyclopedic, too. Do the citations say this? How do they know, since the only other people present are dead and there was no trial? So that article on Nghia achieves a two-for-one violation. But you worked on it, not I. WP:SOFIXIT, why don't you? 
* I wasn't aware that you actually owned this article. Was there a place where I could go to see that you'd registered as primary author? Your pardon if I missed it. SBHarris 04:09, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material? 

message: This article is written from an American POV. Rather inappropriate, all things considered. In particular, why is there nothing about domestic reaction, for instance?122.59.167.152 (talk) 01:45, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vietnamese reaction 

message: This request was inserted by somebody in the main body of the article; I've removed it from there and created this entry here because this (i.e. the Talk page) is the proper place for such a request.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.54.232.175 (talk) 07:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please explain what is meant by "CIA-backed coup d'état" in the opening paragraph.  7/8/2017. 

message: The link to Republican Youth under Diệm's escape redirects to the Sinn Féin Republican Youth
Arrest and assassination of Ngo Dinh Diem#Diệm's escape
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Republican_Youth&redirect=no
--Frosted butts (talk) 21:12, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect link 

message: The following biography of Lucien Conein is relatively recent and outlines his role in the 1963 South Vietnamese coup:
:
Perhaps someone more familiar with subject matter can tell where it might fill in the gaps. - Location (talk) 19:02, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential source

message: Someone, some years ago, mirrored this image on Commons. Is it correct? RodRabelo7 (talk) 15:13, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mirroring of the image