Talk:Flakpanzer Gepard

message: The used pic is wrong. It shows a dutch Cheetah-AAT, which is in many respects similair to its german vehicle but differs in some essential parts, like the radar system. Try this image, that's the right one -- 132.199.232.16 21:27, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article text explicitly refers to both the Gepard, and the Cheetah/PRTL (see also Variants). --- Kato2k6 21:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Image 

message: What should "SysFla" mean? Does anybody more information ?--94.218.248.225 (talk) 11:20, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Users/Germany 

message: I keep in almost constant contact with people interested in aviation around the world, and I've never once heard anyone call this by any other name than "Flakpanzer". That includes the gunner of one such vehicle. So why are we using the uncommon name when the general idea here is to use the most common one? Maury Markowitz (talk) 11:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Because "Flakpanzer" is just a generic term applying to ANY Flakpanzer in the world, whereas this model is the German Flakpanzer Gepard. Yes, there were other Flapanzers too, google them, though most of them never entered serial production and those who did never matched the capabilities of the German Flakpanzer Gepard. -- Alexey Topol (talk) 09:16, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's with the name? 

message: "In Germany the Gepard will be phased out in late 2010 and then replaced by "SysFla" a mobile and stationary air defence system using the LFK NG missile and the new MANTIS gun system. The mobile platform of SysFla will likely be based on the GTK Boxer.["
This is pure speculation. The phasing out took place, yes, but the "replacement systems" only exist on paper thus far and nobody knows whether they will ever work and/or be procured. Apart from that, they do not match the capabilities of the Gepard, which is a truly mobile (even all-terrain) armored system built on the base of the Leopard 1 MBT. In short, the Gepard is phased out for allegedly financial reasons (the Bundeswehr got a yearly 30 billion budget - the phasing out of the Gepard is part of a ridiculous 60-million savings plan, so put that into perspective) and the German army is left with nothing comparable.
Further reading - http://www.defpro.com/daily/details/474/ -- Alexey Topol (talk) 00:34, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pure speculation 

message: Unless I missed it, there is no mention in the article of what company manufactures this vehicle. Someone who knows the answer to this should find a source and add it. LarboardMalarkey (talk) 14:25, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manufacturer? 

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.army-technology.com/projects/gepard/
*:Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 09:22, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Flakpanzer Gepard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090317091843/http://www.forter.ro/ro/inzestrare/ghepard/ to http://www.forter.ro/ro/inzestrare/ghepard/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:38, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This being the English speaking Wikipedia, the unit conversions to PS (pferdestärken) are not of much use. Could somebody change them to, or add, hp(horsepower)? Note that imperial horsepower has a different conversion factor.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.11.31.209 (talk) 06:44, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  kW/ PS / HP 

message: As reference to my military duty made in Belgium in a Gepard crew, the name of the German (and Belgian) weapon was Gepard.
It was also known in that time that the Dutch version (with another Radar) was called "Cesar".
Also every weapon had a "personal" nickname beginning with the company letter.
And on the presentation of the weapon in Netherlands the first one was nicknamed "Cheetah" (being from C-company).
This is why (and cheetah being the english translation of Gepard)this dutch weapon is often called as Cheetah.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pcmichke (talk • contribs) 13:47, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of Dutch Gepard 

message: First three units have just been delivered: https://www.spiegel.de/ausland/krieg-in-osteuropa-ukraine-erhaelt-erste-drei-gepard-luftabwehrpanzer-aus-deutschland-a-6951a52b-1f98-4040-b92a-d88e06062684 (German) 79.211.212.150 (talk) 12:41, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future -> Current Operator Ukraine 

message: There is no evidence that the geopards are effective against Russian drones, all the info is just “trust me bro” especially when video evidence of other AA systems show them failing, and there are videos of shaheds still hitting their targets 2600:1014:B052:4EF0:112A:5B8B:8FC8:CDAD (talk) 20:21, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: They simply can't cover every spot in Ukraine, just too few of them. --Denniss (talk) 21:30, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

text: Obviously the Shahed drones are easy to shoot down for any AA system (not very high, not very fast, predictable flightpath). So the "effective" part means cost effective, it is much cheaper to fire a handful of 35mm rounds (in the range of hundreds of dollars) than a missile (e.g. a Stinger costs over 100k USD). And the 35mm ammo is also easy to produce in large quantities, unlike missiles.--2003:E2:C72D:BC00:183B:3E0E:F259:7D87 (talk) 03:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geopard Ukraine 

message: These are an extremely unique feature, which are pointed out in an image caption, but not addressed in the body of the article.  
What are they? 
Why are they? 
What do they do? 216.74.247.250 (talk) 20:43, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The muzzle velocity is measured to adjust the aim to increase accuracy. There are inevitably slight differences between different ammunition manufacturers or even batches of ammo, and the barrel temperature also plays a role, a hotter barrel contains hotter air that is less dense, that also increases the muzzle velocity. If the muzzle velocity is higher than you anticipated, the trajectory is flatter and the rounds will pass over the target, and vice versa. So instead of sticking to a standard preset to calibrate the aim, the actual speed is measured and (probably as moving average) used as a better value for the following rounds (assuming that the next round is very similar to the previously fired one). Sorry but I have no quotable source for this at hand.--2003:E2:C72D:BC00:183B:3E0E:F259:7D87 (talk) 02:47, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is there no discussion in the article of the velocity-measuring devices?