lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Karan Kapoor

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.london-photographic-association.com/site/pages.php?fid=0,359,600. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 17:35, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I would like to add a photo of Karan Kapoor on his Wikipedia. How do I go about it? Ripalparmar (talk) 14:42, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karan Kapoor 
Talk:The Deadly Years

message: Any truth to the rumor that that's Shatner's actual scalp and hair?
--68.41.122.213 17:29, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, he's still wearing a hairpiece.  It's just placed a little higher up on the forehead and combed straight back. Viewers can easily make out the lace for Shatner's toupee - particularly with the additional clarity of the Blu-ray version.THD3 (talk) 16:37, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Falcon Lodge

message: This page is regularly being vandalised by people I can only refer to as local to this area. They are posting comments which would offend people. Now, I agree that the estate is rough with people lower down on the British social ladder, however, making distasteful comments about them and blaming them for the estate's state is not what Wikipedia wants and is certainly not what the residents of Falcon Lodge want. Please refrain from vandalising the article other wise action against you will be taken. - Erebus555 17:30, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Total Science

message: Whoever, did this article; you should put like a discography, to make it more formal looking. Peace.--Let me see the lightuh...Lightuh! 17:43, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've attempted to get the promotional tone of this article in check by removing the weasel statements and flowery promotional phrasings. There is a long way to go, however, as some of the remaining details cause the article to read like a story rather than an encyclopedia. Sourcing is also an issue. After looking for more sources, it seems that available ones are either self-published by the band or their record labels. This brings up the question of their notability. Any other opinions out there on this? Any way this article can be sourced to the point that it meets WP:NM? Skeletor3000 (talk) 22:32, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Made some adjustments to tone... but are they notable?
Talk:Vellala Gounder

message: Sir,
Why do you meddle with internal link options?I never did with ur article vellala gounder.This will spark a erase-counter erase program again.Please co-operate.I know ur Ravindran Ganapati and lets be good friends. Thanking You,
Pon Dheepankar,Delhi University
:The foramt fot Dissam pages in Wiki is like this 
:* Gounder  caste...
:* Gounder  title...
:Please follow the format
:RaveenS 13:58, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

message: dear friend,
the research of urs can be appreciated to have study value but the authenticity is purely speculative.please give references of inscriptions,plates,texts,grants,etc..,
with love,
pondheepankar k
delhi university. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.141.141.36 (talk) 11:23, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  the research is purely speculative and lacks solid proof......... 

message: The origin of groupism i.e., caste seems to have started with people trying to refer to themselves as one group. There was no divisions and sub divisions until different people started competing for the same resources and had to organize themselves into groups to improve their chances in competing. 
Lathead 12:05, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Groupism i.e., Caste origin 

message: Another reason for groupism came from the profession followed by the differnt groups. As people changed professions, they also had to change names to reflect those professions. However they needed to differentiate themselves from people who were already using those professional names. So as people took up farming they had to call themselves Vellala. However since other groups were using Vellala as title, different groups with additional names were created. Thus were created the various groups of Vellala.
Lathead 12:05, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subdivision origin 

message: You have written gounders don't use brahmins..........will you please clarify what then is the Kulaguru?
For example mine is Elumathur kadai kootam and kulaguru is Pasur Akilanda Deeksitar so pls dont put junk based on Dravidianist propaganda.
love
Pon
D.U
Sir,
I never seen any Kongu Vellala Gounder marriage conducted by brahmins. In other way, i only seen marriage conducted by Arumaikarar, i only seen Gounders Marriage. Kurumban 19:26, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  brother/machi
Talk:Francis Meres

message: Where is Francis Meres' list of Shakespeare's plays?
I'm not sure, I remember seeing them here at one time. There are plenty of references to use online, can someone add them back in?
- anonymous
I supplied the list of the plays. I also edited for neutral POV and supplied a basic summary of the significant role that Meres has played in the Shakespearean authorship question, with reference to one new and very important article. This article still needs a lot of work, including references, which are very weak. There's a lot of scholarship, especially on Palladis Tamia, and I only supplied the most obvious bits. Please help out.--BenJonson (talk) 01:25, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plays?
Talk:Terry Hershey Park

message: www.terryhersheypark.org —This unsigned comment was added by 69.44.230.240 (talk • contribs) .
:I added the link - appears to have good info, maps, and photos -SCEhardT 19:27, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Link suggestion

message: This article is "Stub" class.  Very little content would be left if POV and OR was deleted from it, leaving just a stub.  Jacksinterweb (talk) 03:28, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating
Talk:Kevin Dooley

message: Green Lantern had become stale and boring, despite the fact that the Green Lantern comics were best-sellers before he became the editor, after which the quality and sales began plummeting
This particular line is at odds with the Emerald Twilight write-up:
The editorial decision to shake up the Green Lantern series was eventually justified by revitalized sales and critical acclaim for the series.
So, which is it?  Or, given the sheer animosity that Silver-age Green Lantern fans hold towards Dooley, is it even known one way or another? 156.34.221.174 17:54, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hal Jordan fans were the least of Dooley's troubles as an editor; his lack of competency is well-documented and, frankly, puzzling.  Yet you have a good point.  Claims about circulation numbers should at the very least have some clear source, so I am changing the article. Luis Dantas 10:40, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Green Lantern
Category talk:Musicologists

message: Surely a musicologist is someone who studies music.  Someone who studies musicology would be something like a metamusicologist. --GuillaumeTell 18:08, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Semantics? A musicologist does study musicology, at least while in school. Historians study the past and history. Hyacinth 06:53, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm happy with "practises" - much better! --GuillaumeTell 11:05, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Standards of spelling.  "Practice" is a noun.  "Practise" is the verb.  It may be that this distinction isn't observed in the USA any more (or, maybe, never was) and/or it is being eroded elsewhere.  If so, it's a symptom of the Collapse Of Western Civilisation As We Know It.  Or something like that. --GuillaumeTell 22:00, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, good to know that our ignorance goes both ways. Hyacinth 09:17, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Studies __?

message: The parent category :Category:Music scholars is basically empty except for the :Category:Musicologists.  Distinctions between these categories are apparently not observed by Wikipedian editors.  Can we merge them together?  And if so, which is the preferred category name -- Music scholars, or musicologists?  --lquilter 16:03, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Senate Democratic Caucus

message: This article says there are 3 independents caucusing with the Democratic party members for a total of 51, and Party leaders of the United States Senate#Current floor leaders says 4 independents, again for a total of 51.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  17:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction
Talk:Infraspecific taxon

message: I don't know much about this subject, so I won't edit the page, but I do know that infra = below, not inside. Intra would be inside.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Radulfr (talk • contribs) 31 March 2006 (UTC)
: In taxonomy, below implies inside. There is no contradiction. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:07, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  infra vs intra 

message: There is a redirect, but it does not lead to here. I suppose that there are some botanical/zoological incomprehensivenesses, but some cleanup should be made IMHO. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:07, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Infraspecies]] 

message: Although a taxon and its name are not exactly the same, the unreferenced article as of 08:06, 15 April 2011 says nothing that does not appear in the much longer and properly referenced article Infraspecific name (botany). So I've made it a redirect to that article. Peter coxhead (talk) 21:15, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Made a re-direct
Talk:Passive speaker (language)

message: "passive speakers" comes from the article on the Ainu people. The original author states they were just trying to flesh out what was a red link, but I believe they were guessing at the meaning.
I began to totally rewrite the article because of its terrible quality, but I realized while researching that nothing seems to turn up about passive speakers in linguistics. There are, however, passive speakers in sound systems.
Liastnir 18:29, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Passive speaker#Primary topic.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:11, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[Talk:Passive speaker#Primary topic]]

message: — Assignment last updated by Cchen310 (talk) 04:45, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Multilingualism and Language contact
Talk:Johannes Agricola

message: This page is currently about the historical person.  I have reverted its conversion to being an article about the Browning poem.  I'll visit the talk page of the editor to help straighten it out. John (Jwy) 18:42, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Person, not poem

message: The alternative article has him born in 1492. Chicheley 16:26, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth verification
Talk:A Touch of Class (band)

message: Assuming there is significant information about each group, I think it would be a good idea to split this topic into two, each focusing on one of the groups. While the current article does a fairly good job of distinguishing which band is being talked about at any given time, there are still a couple of ambiguous sections (it's hard to tell which band the "current status" section is talking about. It also seems odd to have an info box about only one of the two bands listed. Echnaret (talk) 15:41, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Split 

message: "The DJ and producer ATB successfully took the band's record label to court, and they were forced to change their name to A Touch Of Class." What did they change their name from? The article presents both bands as always being named "A Touch of Class." Echnaret (talk) 15:41, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change 

message: The website that it links to is not correct. It's a random wix.com website that someone else owns that has some info about the band. It links to their social media. They were not in the band.
100.2.58.199 (talk) 00:46, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Website
Talk:Carl Bohm

message: User:Santo Neuenwelt obtained permission to use this text under the GNU Free Documentation License and provided this documentation to Wikipedia. See note at User_talk:Alabamaboy#Have_Taken_Your_Advice for more information.--Alabamaboy 18:43, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text licensed under GFDL 

message: I do not undertand why this page was marked as a copyright violation. I am the copyright holder and I granted permission und the GNU free documentation license for its use and distribution etc. back in March of 2006 for the information to be used. Administrator Alabamaboy approved it, so I do not know why suddenly it is a violation. Please restore this page. R.H.R. Silvertrust, Managing Editor of Edition Silvertrust. User name Santo Neuenwelt.
:My mistake. Reverted to version immediately prior to copyvio mark. -- cmh 02:48, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio
Talk:Constantin Dimitrescu

message: User:Santo Neuenwelt obtained permission to use this text under the GNU Free Documentation License and provided this documentation to Wikipedia. See note at User_talk:Alabamaboy#Have_Taken_Your_Advice for more information.--Alabamaboy 18:44, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text licensed under GFDL 
Talk:Theodore Gouvy

message: User:Santo Neuenwelt obtained permission to use this text under the GNU Free Documentation License and provided this documentation to Wikipedia. See note at User_talk:Alabamaboy#Have_Taken_Your_Advice for more information.--Alabamaboy 18:44, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text licensed under GFDL 

message: The subject of this article is duplicated by the article Louis Théodore Gouvy - his full name. The contents of this article should be combined into the other article (which is generally better, contains a photo, has better sources, and is under his full name). Then, it should be deleted. - - I do not know how to combine and delete articles, or I would do it myself. Help is needed. Merci. Bien amicalement. Charvex (talk) 06:50, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: One of them should be deleted, I am not sure which. Naming convention guidelines need to be carefully examined. But no, not deleted- this would be replaced by a redirect to the other article. But they do need to be merged. Schissel | Sound the Note! 20:08, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The shorter name is normally preferred - if there are no other Theodore Gouvys out there. However I see the longer title is used by the French and German pages. What does Grove use? --Kleinzach (talk) 04:39, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Will check. The 1880 edition uses Theodore Gouvy (easily google-book checked) but will access the latest Grove soon. Schissel | Sound the Note! 02:18, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicated article, Please Delete
Talk:Chamber Music Journal

message: User:Santo Neuenwelt obtained permission to use this text under the GNU Free Documentation License and provided this documentation to Wikipedia. See note at User_talk:Alabamaboy#Have_Taken_Your_Advice for more information.--Alabamaboy 18:45, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text licensed under GFDL 
Talk:Duane Pederson

message: Is there some confirmation to the claim that Duane Pederson "coined" the term "Jesus movement"?  In the late 1960s, many social movements were active: the civil rights movement, the free speech movement, the anti-war movement, the hippie movement, the black power movement, the human potential movement, et al.
The movement was variously known in the media as the "Jesus movement", the "Jesus People movement", the "Jesus Freak movement" and other terms. Why do we believe that Pederson invented the term?
EricP 18:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coined the term "Jesus movement"? 

message: Although attributed with coining the words Jesus People, Fr. Duane Pederson clarified in an audio interview that those exact words were placed in his mouth by a news agency when he said "We're people who love Jesus."
Here is the audio interview: http://www.hollywoodfreepaper.org/interview.php?id=1 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Johngberry (talk • contribs) 20:55, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't know about "Jesus Movement", but... 
Talk:Alexander Taneyev

message: User:Santo Neuenwelt obtained permission to use this text under the GNU Free Documentation License and provided this documentation to Wikipedia. See note at User_talk:Alabamaboy#Have_Taken_Your_Advice for more information.--Alabamaboy 18:49, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text licensed under GFDL 

message: I slapped the "Wikify" notice on this page because I think it needs some severe polishing - right now it's way too conversational to constitute a decent article. --AlbertHerring 20:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikification

message: I did my best to Wikify this and remove some of the conversational attitude from it, including the "slipping away from test tubes" phrase. Please take a look and let me know if this is at all an improvement. Thank you! Emmegan 17:33, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikification 

message: In books, his name is usually spelled Alexandr in direct transliteration. A google of both names shows a slight preponderance of Alexandr rather than Alexander, and yet the article makes no mention of this spelling, although it offers several variants of his last name and variant spellings of his cousin, Sergei.
Suggestions?
--UnicornTapestry (talk) 01:17, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The preponderance is actually for Aleksandr if we're going for accuracy. "Alexandr" – which is, of course, not a direct transliteration of Александр – is really rather rare, at least on the net. -- Picapica (talk) 11:00, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's a filthy hybrid.  The Russian кс is converted to Latin x, but all the other letters have their own individual translations.  It's as bad as transliterating Пётр as Pёtr, which used to be astoundingly common.  --  Jack of Oz [Talk] 11:14, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alexandr 

message: I don't know diddly about this guy - I was only looking here to make sure I wasn't confusing him with Sergei Taneyev. Regardless of where the text of this article originally came from, it badly need some references. I choked on "among his best works", and with no knowledge of him whatever, changed that to among his better-known works, which might pass muster a little easier. Milkunderwood (talk) 07:45, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Among his best works 
Talk:Zero crossing

message: My understanding is that zero crossing detection is also used in devices like digital audio players (when changing volume) and other digital systems where an instantaneous change in gain takes place that would produce an undesirable artifact. I'd add it to the article but I don't have reference nor experience. --Ktims 18:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be the smart way to do it.  I'm not sure if anyone actually does, though. — Omegatron 18:58, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: After doing a small amount of research, it looks like at least most of the general purpose audio codec ICs in use for this purpose support zero-crossing detection for volume control, and from the datasheets it looks pretty easy to implement, so I don't see why they wouldn't be. Incidentally, the Wolfson (iPod nano ) and TI (iAudio ) datasheets reek of plagiarism in that section...Anyway, after finding production ICs from 3 major players, barring dissent, I'll add it to the article. Here's a $0.95 DAC part from National that does it too . --Ktims 23:05, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sounds good.  ;-)  — Omegatron 00:06, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The page title should be "zero-crossing". This is a crossing of zero (that is, the x-axis), not a crossing that is equal to zero. "Zero" is an attributive noun here, not an adjective, and the hyphenation makes this clear. — Paul G (talk) 15:20, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title 

message: This article doesn't seem to have a topic. Maybe it could be split up, or turned into a disambig page. Bhny (talk) 17:16, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  rambling disambiguation page
Talk:Baragon

message: Please don't re-add this article to "Fictional dinosaurs". It is clearly identified in the article as being a therapsid - not a dinosaur. -pinkgothic 13:01, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category: Fictional dinosaurs 

message: Ok, I'm not even sure why people are calling Baragon a "Mutated/Irradiated Triceratops". HE'S NOT! Baragon (In the Showa era, at least) is a generic (IE: Not of one particular genus or species or whatnot) mutated dinosaur-thing, and he's an ancient guardian-type monster in GMK. Seriously, Baragon doesn't even look like a Triceratops. I'll point out the differences for those who cannot see them-
*1. Baragon has ONE horn, Triceratops had THREE, 
*2. Baragon has floppy ears, Triceratops had a frill, 
*3. Baragon ate MEAT, Triceratops ate PLANTS, 
*4. Baragon has razor-sharp teeth, Triceratops had a beak, 
*5. Baragon could burrow underground, Triceratops cannot, 
*6. Baragon is a surprisingly good jumper, Triceratops couldn't jump at all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.220.144.243 (talk) 18:46, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baragon is NOT a Triceratops