lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Human Factor (novel)

message: To say that Davis is quietly disposed of masks the horror of what is done: a completely innocent man is poisoned and then cremated without an inquest. Also,
Daintry as head of security is senior to Castle but is not his boss.
The Lawless One (talk) 13:28, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If the movie is true to the book of the same name, it seems that Graham Greene's 1978 novel The Human Factor has a similar plot device - the 'turning' of an agent in the intelligence community.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ndywiki2015 (talk • contribs) 17:17, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  plot parallels
Talk:Block (permutation group theory)

message: There are further meanings of `block' in mathematics, see e.g.
Block Theory
and Block Design.
: Well, add them. This is a Wiki after all, be bold. Dysprosia 14:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: *Oppose merging Primitive permutation group into this article: primitive groups have been introduced a long time before blocks and are basic for Galois theory. If a merger make sense, it would be to merge this article into Primitive permutation group, as a technical generalization of primitive groups. D.Lazard (talk) 15:48, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:The Clairvoyant (1935 film)

message: "It is often considered to be one of the first horror films."
I would take exception to this phrase, since there were numerous other films released in the silent era of the 1920's which can be considered horror - Lon Chaney Sr. appearances in London After Midnight and  Phantom of the Opera, and the F.W. Murnau directed Nosferatu just to name three. 
Also, Universal's Dracula and Frankenstein were both released in 1931, three years before this film was. --The Kevin 01:29, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Anthony Adverse

message: Call him h 74.72.5.95 (talk) 23:56, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titanic
Talk:The Sea Hawk (1940 film)

message: The link to the reconstructor of Korngold's score leads to a Canadian lawyer and politician.  He seems like an unlikely person to be reconstructing old Hollywood movie scores and no mention of such an unusual interest is made in his article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.119.205.88 (talk) 23:54, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  John W. Morgan? 

message: Why no mention of the change from B&W in the first part of the film to sepia-tone for the Panama part and back again to B&W for the last, post Panama, part?
Very few films have used this technique with the best known example being The Wizard of Oz (1939 film) with the pre and post Oz parts being B&W/sepia and the Oz part in total technicolor.
With the rare use of the technique, I think it should be included/mentioned in the article/entry.
This has been added, but it says "the Western Hemisphere." The entire movie takes place in the Western Hemisphere. Maybe "New World" or "The Americas" or something would be more specific.
I changed it to "Panama" to be specific. 2600:8800:785:1300:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 09:40, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  B&W and sepia-tone 

message: When the Sea Hawks appear before Elizabeth, there is a character described as Captain Hawkins, who I think speaks briefly.  I take it this is supposed to be John Hawkins, but I don't see him on any cast list. PatGallacher (talk) 19:03, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, just found him on the AllMovie link. PatGallacher (talk) 19:09, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Captain Hawkins
Talk:National Lampoon's European Vacation

message: "Clark drives his family around the busy Picadilly Circus roundabout for hours, unable to manouver his way out of traffic"
I've managed to find someone with a worse grasp of London than the Griswalds! Picadilly Circus is the place with the Neon Billboards and the winged statue of Eros. I have corrected the main entry.(AndrewAnorak 06:14, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Was Ballad Berkley's character meant to be the Major from Fawlty Towers, or is this just a coincidence of casting? (AndrewAnorak 15:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fawlty Driving?

message: mhh? 46.114.39.183 (talk) 23:54, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  griswold vs. griswald confusion 

message: I do know that he was nominally credited, but I do not think it is necessary to include him in the infobox and the article's introduction. He had confirmed that he had nothing to do with it, after all. 136.169.224.16 (talk) 17:56, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hughes as the writer of the script and the story
Talk:Jeepers Creepers 2

message: needs a plot outline and more detail
role of scott wrongly credited, should be Eric Nenninger
izzy bohen is the real hero, when he crashes tha car against the creeper, it losts him arm,leg and wings, and nobody talk about him ¬¬  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.9.67.161 (talk) 05:01, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs a plot outlione 

message: If I cite my sources, the material should not be deleted and replaced with false information that also has no citations.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.72.173.62 (talk) 01:30, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing Struggles
Talk:Scream 2

message: Per MOS:FILM#Soundtrack, tracklists for scores are discouraged.  I think it would probably best to remove the score tracklist, as we've already got two paragraphs in prose, as suggested by the MOS. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, didn't realize a Talk thread had been initiated before I re-removed the list. But agreed. DonIago (talk) 02:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, I was going to revert it, but then I thought maybe it'd be better to take it to talk instead.  When I was looking over the MOS again, it said that tracklists are "discouraged", which leaves a bit more wiggle room than I recalled.  So, I figured it couldn't hurt to explicitly gain consensus here. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:05, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Score tracklist 

message: The movie take place one year after Scream not two years in 1998, IMDb confirms the date on the page: April 12, 1997 (talk) 15:40 13 March 2018 (UTC)
:IMDb is not a reliable source. DonIago (talk) 19:51, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Year

message: Here is an interview with Kevin Williamson about all the script changes. Good material for the production section (that also mentions this Wikipedia article) 'Scream 2' Script Urban Legend Explained by Kevin Williamson Mike Allen 22:42, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Interview about script changes source

message: I’m going to be telling you about screen @[[User:RaeleIgh| 69.125.97.197 (talk) 12:26, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screen
Talk:Soul Plane

message: I removed the reception as it was highly biased and cited no refrences or sources. If you think the movie was mediocre that's fine by me but your personal criticsms of the movies have no place on Wikipedia, a neutral encyclopedia. 68.219.26.177 (talk) 02:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reception

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. echidnaLives - talk - edits 03:41, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Mystery of the Wax Museum

message: Is it just a coincidence that the remake House of Wax (1953 film) was made the same year that they thought the only remaining prints of this film were destroyed? 70.20.209.146 18:12, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know, but that statement definitely needs a (citation needed) tag.  The Photoplayer 06:35, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 1953 coincidence

message: Article need refs, badly.  Luigibob 05:57, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: This article states that the movie was "(b)ased on an unpublished short story entitled "The Wax Works" by Charles Spencer Belden." However, the article about its remake "House of Wax" (with Vincent Price) states that the movie is "based on Charles Belden's three-act play, The Wax Works." These statements appear to contradict each other.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.189.13.145 (talk) 10:19, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Short story vs. three-act play?

message: Held here. PanagiotisZois (talk) 22:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scripts
Talk:First Knight

message: Could the title of this film be a punning reference to the medieval concept of the right of the first night, i.e., the medieval lord's right to deflower the bride?
Doc Clay
Museraine (talk) 18:17, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Could the title?

message: I removed the word "Excalibur" from the text. Of course we all know that Arthur's sword should be the famous Excalibur, but it isn't mentioned in the movie. Nor does the movie deptict Arthur's sword is anything but a piece of sharp metal. As mentioned in the article, the movie contains no magical elements whatsoever, of which the magical sword Excalibur otherwise should be one. --90.130.236.170 (talk) 04:06, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excalibur 

message: Since Wik's definition of fantasy (linked in the opening sentence) talks about having magic or the supernatural and since the FK article specifically says there is no magic in the movie, what grounds are there for using the word "fantasy" to describe it? Kdammers (talk) 06:37, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the fantasy labels. Erik (talk | contribs) 11:59, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the movie called a fantasy in the opening sentence? 

message: "Due to the shortness of the original release, bootleg versions began to appear in 2000"
What does this mean? Why should a short soundtrack make a bootleg version somehow inevitable? Rob Burbidge (talk) 13:55, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bootleg
Talk:Outbreak (film)

message: In 'In Praise of Difficult Women' by Karen Karbo 188.29.134.80 (talk) 19:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I read that Carrie Fisher worked as a script doctor on this film 

message: I note that the quotation about "director Wolfgang Petersen's rabid pacing" is an accurate transcription of the Washington Post review. Should the article highlight the fact that the review uses the word "rabid" ("of or pertaining to rabies") rather than the word "rapid" ("very swift or quick")? In light of the subject-matter, I realise that this was probably a pun rather than a typographical error by the Post. Alekksandr (talk) 21:40, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: "Rabid" can be used to mean that someone did something very quickly in a somewhat frenzied state, i.e. as though rabid. As such, it may or may not have been a pun, but it's not an error. DonIago (talk) 01:28, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Rabid/Rapid
Talk:King Creole

message: Of course, this being Wikipedia, someone who has control of an article has a major advantage over good faith contributors. However, "gangster that" is simply not proper grammar. So why did you change it back? That is only one small example of the poor text in this article about Elvis Presley's by-far best movie. In addition, a quick perusal of the plot yielded a number of easily correctible and fact-checkable, non-subjective errors, such Danny's actual reply to Miss (not Mrs.) Pearson, the quintessential old maid. Let's please write the best article we can, with proper grammar and a correct synopsis. All of my recent edits were needed and should be restored.
Dstlascaux (talk) 15:28, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please, let's rewrite this article in English, with the facts right 

message: This sentence had been in the article: "Because the more serious and gritty film strayed from the pretty scenery/pretty girls plotless formula that the legions of Presley fans wanted, it was less than a smash at the box office." - I removed it due to historical inaccuracy. While this observation may hold merit regarding Presley's garrulous series of 'Elvis movies' in the 1960s, in the 1950s those hadn't happened yet, and his four films from 1956 to 1958 were serious attempts, and taken as such by audiences at the time. The formula pictures came later.PJtP 00:56, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  sentence removed 

message: The article states that Presley never got the chance to be taken seriously as an actor again because of his post-army films. But what about the film Charro, which was a tough western where not only did he have a beard but also did no singing as part of the action? (79.190.69.142 (talk) 21:44, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article states that he never got to be taken as seriously as an actor again, not that he was never taken seriously again. Of course he was with films such as Flaming Star, Wild in the Country, Charro!, and Change of Habit. However, none of these films are anywhere near as serious as King Creole and I think many would agree that the quality of his acting in King Creole was never matched on screen again. ElvisFan1981 (talk) 21:58, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Elvis as a serious actor

message: There is no verifiable evidence that either, or both, of these persons are in the film. USColonialHistorian (talk) 15:04, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jerry Lewis and Dean Martin
Talk:Hide and Seek (2005 film)

message: I just watched this film (on TV in the UK) and it didn't match either of the two suggested alternative endings.
18:55, 20 October 2007
I searched and came up with this page which suggests a total of five endings.
I've tried to incorporate these in the article.
Someone who actually has the DVD, and ideally knows which cuts were released where should clean this up (the one I saw ends with the ward door being locked and Katherine saying she won't give up on Emily, with no Hide and Seek sequence).
Justynb 15:35, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Maybe Wiki should consider changing Robert De Nitro’s character credit to simply “David Callaway” and omit “Charlie” as it ruins the entire film.  Major spoiler! I was looking up Elizabeth Shue and the Wiki credits ruined the surprise. Johnny806 (talk) 21:44, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reveal in Cast credits
Talk:Lamé (fencing)

message: The second paragraph restates the first.  The only difference is that the first paragraph states that the jacket itself is called lamé, whereas the second states that the jacket is made of lamé fabric.  Yet the third para states that lamé fabric is the familiar shiny material so dear to Hollywood and Las Vegas performers.  Obviously all three statements cannot be true, and obviously the fencing jacket is not made of shiny drapy material.  Can someone fix please? Canonblack 13:21, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fix'd Doughboy 03:14, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Long Day Closes (film)

message: The song is now in a separate article, The Long Day Closes (song). It may well be that the song inspired the film, but as the film article was here first, the song article gets the disambiguated title. (Posted by User:Marc Shepherd in 2006)
: *nod* Wasn't sure whether the main page ought to be a disambiguation page, or if one should be preferenced. Adam Cuerden 17:21, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: Was the film's title inspired by The Long Day Closes (song)?  -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:15, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Inspiration
Talk:Love Letters (1945 film)

message: I've just revamped the plot summary and added a discussion of Rand's screenplay. Sorry, I forgot I hadn't logged in while making those changes. GMcGath 14:04, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 
Talk:Portrait of Jennie

message: The plot summary abruptly ends with: 
* "Eventually he learns the truth about Jennie and though inevitable tragedy ensues, she continues to be an inspiration to Eben's life and art, and his career makes a remarkable upturn, commencing with his portrait of Jennie." 
Yet no truth is revealed here and there is nothing about what the "inevitable tragedy" could be. This is Wikipedia, where "spoilers" are thankfully discounted. There is no reason to withhold this information; it is why I came here. Somebody in the know, please add it in.
Thank you for your time, Wordreader (talk) 22:55, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary bails on us.
Talk:Lady Frankenstein

message: Donald Glut notes the affinity with Vampirella#4, "For the Love of Frankenstein".
12:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This film's copyright was automatically restored by this Act in 1996, although no Notice of Intent to Enforce a Copyright was filed. This must be treated as copyrighted. --George Ho (talk) 04:11, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm certainly no expert in copyright law, but as we are a 100% free resource, it is best to err on the side of caution. There's no need for us to risk problems, so I have removed the links to the Internet Archive and Google video. 64.40.54.138 (talk) 09:33, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Uruguay Round Agreements Act]]
Talk:Procreation

message: WHy isn this not merged with Human sexuality? Dominick (TALK) 13:24, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. It only exists because I noticed someone created a glib article called "babymaking", and I wanted to get rid of it (articles named for slang terms make us look bad) without bothering with an VFD. jdb ❋ (talk) 19:01, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Mention under what circumstances animals might choose not to have children. Jidanni (talk) 10:15, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animals who choose not to have children
Talk:Black Sabbath (film)

message: Do you really think, that Aleksey Konstantinovich Tolstoy (August 24 1817 – October 10 1875)wrote the screenplay?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.66.189.125 (talk) 11:04, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the stories are claimed to be based of their works, but they never created such stories apparently. Andrzejbanas (talk) 07:51, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: OPLY?

message: I looked for this article because the film is airing right now, and I was curious about it. I think the plot summaries are just right; I appreciated the amount of detail without thinking it was long-winded, and I wouldn't insist on cutting them. 71.79.244.206 (talk) 07:13, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I trimmed it a bit just to have it within our guidelines. There was only a few things that needed re-arranging. Andrzejbanas (talk) 07:51, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Excessively Detailed?

message: I just performed a needed trim on the article, and in the process removed a statement that is demonstrably false.  The statement seemed to claim that Snyder and Tolstoy are fictional characters. Aleksey Konstantinovich Tolstoy is obviously not a fictional character, and the same paragraph two sentences later provided the title of his novella that was used as the source for the segment, "The Wurdulak" (and it appears to my shaky knowledge of Russian to be a fair translation of the title given in the film credits).  I therefore have no idea what the offending sentence was meant to say; Tolstoy is not fictional, the title given as the source for the film segment really exists and has a similar plot and identically-named characters. I can't vouch for F. G. Snyder, however; all references to him point back to this film.  If someone wants to restore the claim that F. G. Snyder is fictional, find a source to back your claim. 12.233.147.42 (talk) 02:51, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rem demonstrably false statement
Talk:The Raven (1963 film)

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 17:45, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: In the scene with Peter Lorre and Boris Karloff they do the Vulcan live long and prosper hand signal.
Near the end during the duel to the death, Vincent Price is threatened with moving gargoyles by Boris Karloff similar to the mives if the angel statues in Dr Who. Seusszilla (talk) 03:49, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  just caught these quirks
Talk:The Tomb of Ligeia

message: Just to confirm: although there's no The on the pictured poster (which just says "Edgar Allan Poe's Tomb of Ligeia), the word is present in the title sequence of the film itself, which says "Edgar Allan Poe's The Tomb of Ligeia". Equinox ◑ 06:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:The Pit and the Pendulum

message: There's an Iranian film called The Spell (in Persian: طلسم) which is loosely based on the script of this movie. It was released on 1986 and Dariush Farhang directed it. I say this because I have watched both. But unfortunately, I couldn't find a reference to support this claim. Aminabzz (talk) 22:04, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It sounds like it would be okay not to include that information in this article, then. Certainly, if there were an article on the movie, it could mention is origins. Maybe Edgar Allan Poe in television and film, which is basically a cruft article anyway. --Midnightdreary (talk) 14:44, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Spell
Talk:The Little Shop of Horrors

message: The problem is that most people won't be aware of the difference between two films, one of which is titled "Little Shop of Horrors" and the other titled "The Little Shop of Horrors". So it's worth putting the year in as well, to prevent confusion. FT2 (Talk | email) 09:33, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title/disambiguation 

message: #Is it reasonably well written?
#:A. Prose quality:  
#:: 
#:B. MoS compliance: 
#:: 
#Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
#:A. References to sources:  
#:: 
#:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
#:: 
#:C. No original research: 
#:: 
#Is it broad in its coverage?
#:A. Major aspects:  
#:: 
#:B. Focused: 
#:: 
#Is it neutral?
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#Is it stable?
#: No edit wars, etc: 
#:: 
#Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
#:A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
#:: 
#:B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass or Fail: 
#:: 
Congratulations! The Little Shop of Horrors has met all the criteria to become a good article. Thanks to all who contributed!Limetolime (talk) 01:14, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Successful [[good article]] nomination
Talk:Last Woman on Earth

message: The black and white screencaps on this page should be replaced with color screencaps, as the film was shot in Eastmancolor. The black and white version was created for television airings, and is not the original version. (Sugar Bear 20:10, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screencaps 

message: This film was used as the basis for a humorous "mash-up" film, title above by Mike Davis. Available on amazon video https://www.amazon.com/Last-Naked-Woman-Earth-Davis/dp
Additional music and footage. All of the original film seems to be included.
Would it be ok to add a See Also entry for this?  Mike Lacey, UK 15:16, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Naked Woman on the Earth