lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hop Farm

message: On 14 December 2010, an unregistered user tagged this article as a copyright problem. Unfortunately, no suspected source was supplied. I have done a search of the internet, but the only matches I found were to "mirrors" of Wikipedia, including this site which quotes us without attribution. We can verify that they are quoting us because their quotes reflect later edits, cf. . If a source that predates this article has been located, please identify it when returning the "copyvio" template. We do appreciate readers and contributors who remain conscious of these concerns. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:19, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright concerns
Talk:Irish Daily Star

message: Are there significant differences in content between these two editions? I seem to recall an article in Private Eye which said that the green-top Irish Star had a very strong pro-Republican stance and regularly published anti-British and anti-monarchy articles, whereas the Irish Daily Star did not. 217.155.20.163 19:22, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Irish Star (green Northern Ireland version) versus Irish Daily Star
Talk:Dolly (French band)

message: I have written the basic biography based on the English sources and some French sources translated with Babelfish. Could someone, who know more about the band and can read French, write a more comprehensive biography of Dolly? It would also be interesting to know more about the members; Date of birth etc.
I haven't found any source to back up that Dolly's (or actually Dolly & Co's) first album was named Dolly & Co. It's in the article because it was mentioned in the first version of the article.
Cryonic07 19:22, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center

message: I'm surprised this page never existed before now. Talk about an article literally in my backyard! Wildthing61476 19:28, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to this source Baltimore City Hospital became Mercy, not JHBMC. Does anyone have sourcing for this claim? Yworo (talk) 20:59, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baltimore City Hospital 

message: This is a list of possible sources to include in this article:
*Bayview Asylum
*"Johns Hopkins plans $469 million expansion and modernization of its Bayview Medical Center"
*Pictures of Bayview Hospital and Asylum
*"Hopkins unveils Key Pavilion, renames eastern site Bayview"
*The History of the Bayview Medical Center
*Clinical Excellence at the Bayview Medical Center
* Adding citations
* Evaluating articles and sources
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Conradsay (talk • contribs) 20:02, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Exeter, Rhode Island

message: Anyone know these?
76.102.31.185 (talk) 03:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates of settlement and incorporation 
Wikipedia talk:Upload

message: Not sure if this is the right place to bring this up or if it has already been discussed, but I have a suggestion. When a signed-in user wishes to upload a new version of a file, he simply clicks on Upload a new version of this file. However, if he is a non-user or is not signed in, he sees nothing. That link simply vanishes. On at least one occasion this has caused some confusion. My suggestion is to leave that link in place, and if it is clicked on by a non-user, he is taken to a page that tells him to either sign in or sign up. This is a very common (and useful) way to handle such a situation. (It would also be desirable to extend this change to commons and all wikis.) JBarta (talk) 21:43, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Upload a new version of this file" 

message: Please add the interwiki hi:विकिपीडिया:अपलोड for the corresponding upload form on hi-wp.
Query:
Shouldn't the page text in div id autoconfirmedusers be invisible to IP users? I see both the autconfirmedusers text and the newusers text when logged out (and yes, I cleared my cache).--Siddhartha Ghai (talk) 08:16, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't answer your question about the CSS, but I've added the iw link as requested; thanks for pointing that out. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:25, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interwiki Editrequest and query 

message: Cross-posting: see proposal at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#New Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard: ready for production. – Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:52, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New upload wizard 

message: Hi. Please revert to the old upload form. This requires moving Wikipedia:Upload/old back to Wikipedia:Upload. This test has had a good run (a little over a month) and data from it can now be gathered and analyzed and hopefully the results of such data can be incorporated into a proper solution that's integrated with MediaWiki. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:01, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:29, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please revert test 

message: Please change the redirect to point to Wikipedia:File upload wizard (lowercase) to avoid the double redirect, as the page was moved per the recent RM (permalink). Thanks! Tol (talk | contribs) @ 05:07, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: — xaosflux Talk 11:50, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fully-protected edit request on 29 December 2022
Talk:Popular Front of Estonia

message: In summary for , Petri Krohn argues that since the Popular Front of Estonia had views that were inconsistent with the idea of Estonia having been occupied by Soviet Union, the background of this article should not refer to the occupation.
This is an interesting argument, but unfortunately wrong.  The background description is factual, which means it is about facts, not about views of any particular organisation -- even if it's the organisation in question.  Thus, since the occupation was factual, PFE's views on this matter do not matter.  At the very most, they may be explicitly stated as PFE's WP:POV, if it fits into the narrative and has sufficient notability and relevance. Digwuren 23:34, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organisation-specific [[WP:POV]]s 

message: Petri Krohn has repeatedly, both here and elsewhere, replaced references to occupation with euphemisms such as "incorporation into the Soviet Union", apparently under the pretense of the word 'occupation' constituting hate speech.  I consider this vandalism of the silly kind, analogous to a Klansman going through articles and replacing references to black people with references to human-shaped creatures of highly light-absorbing skin. Digwuren 14:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Commercial mortgage

message: I have seen a lot of commercial loans, and they are always nonrecourse or they have a personal line of credit for a certain dollar amount. I've never seen a borrower attach a guarantee to pay the debt regardless of how far under the property goes. I only work with larger sized loans (above $5m) so maybe this is more common with smaller loans. It is probably difficult to find a source on andecdotal information such as this, and I'm not going to change the text for now. Williameis 19:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercial Mortage Summary Section

message: Should this section be deleted? Would talking about leverage increasing returns be more useful? Williameis 20:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uses 

message: I added a citation needed tag for agency lending taking over the apartment sector.  There are still a lot of non-agency mortgages for apartments and I question if agency has taken over much as the page implies. Williameis 20:49, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agency Mortgages 

message: The page you wanted to link with is already attached to an item on the central data repository which links to Hypothec on this site. Items can only have one page per site attached. Please choose a different page to link with. P.S There is a wikidata error but I don't know how to fix it.--Dellmatron (talk) 21:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The page you wanted to link with is already attached to an item on the central data
Talk:Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series

message: I strongly believe the hatnote should be remove, the distinction is enough, it is unneeded. SoapFan12 00:04, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Many readers should know what they are looking for. The Daytime and Primetime has very similar spelling but : To make it easier to, someone should add something in the lead saying : "This awards also recognize outstanding achievement of an actress who has appeared in a programming beetween the hours of 2:00AM and 6:00AM or something." The readears will know when their programming is broadcast. SoapFan12 00:40, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the hatnote clears any confusion up right away, so additional sentences in the lead aren't necessary then. I just think it's much easier to have the hatnote, to avoid any confusion on our end, and for the reader's sake.Caringtype1 (talk) 00:56, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hatnote 
Talk:South Beach (nightclub)

message: I would have figured "neartown" is closer to "W. Gray" and "Allen Parkway". The Montrose has always been referred to as a section of a city unto itself.
Also, if this is left on here, perhaps it should be placed in a subcategory for "Gay Bars in Houston" to be inclusive to the area. While I'm interested in expanding this (and Montrose overall), I think the nightlife should have it's own little section whether it's gay or straight and still maintain a certain neutrality. --Hourick 17:01, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Montrose is located within Neartown's boundaries. I'm not sure, but I believe South Beach (nightclub) is the only Houston gay bar on Wikipedia. I would suggest that a new article "Nightlife in Houston, Texas" be created for the entire city, organized by location, music style/genre, etc. Create a "Nightlife in Houston, Texas" category and put the new article and any club/bar articles in this category. We can then link the new "Nightlife in Houston, Texas" article from the Houston, Texas and Culture of Houston as a "See also" reference. Postoak 20:49, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough, I think a mention in a "proposed nightlife" section would do nicely then. Generalities mentioned and observed, of course. --Hourick 22:45, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Near Town or Montrose? Gay Bars.. 

message: *https://www.chron.com/entertainment/restaurants-bars/article/South-Beach-nightclub-in-Montrose-is-closed-for-12544931.php
---Another Believer (Talk) 18:40, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: *https://houston.culturemap.com/news/restaurants-bars/07-11-22-south-beach-nightclub-dance-club-reopening-lgbtq-charles-armstrong/
---Another Believer (Talk) 14:45, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:Statistician

message: This article is far too focused on the United States, and requires the inclusion of information regarding statisticians in other countries to have real encyclopaedic value.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.212.86 (talk) 23:07, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Other countries?
Talk:Races of Destiny

message: Is it possible to get the picture from any number of selling sites (Amazon etc)? 88.111.15.149 (talk) 19:49, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to come up with a fair-use rationale and the possibility of getting a free image of the front cover HAS TO BE ZERO. -Jeske (v^_^v) 21:20, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Wikipedia talk:Deletion review/Log/2007 January 11

message: Ok, I admit trying to fabricate a new word (Jamify) to promote a new website.  So, I understand it falling into Wikipedia's snowball policy.  The reasoning behind the submission was because other music web sites had entries.  
Here are some neutral-party conversations linking "jamify" to music.
  http://www.bebo.com/Profile.jsp?MemberId=1481184664
  http://www.xanga.com/Msock
  http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=62577099
  http://www.myspace.com/worldradiostar
The terms "Wikify" and "Jamify" have a similar tread of meaning.  For a word it's the act (or process) of achieving recognition in the wikipedia community.  For a musician it's the act (or process) of achieving recognition in the music community...  Well, that's how http://www.jamify.com would like to understand the word.
So, if Jamify can't be an official word, how do I get it wikified?
--Cliffloehr 19:52, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Rubicon (English band)

message: Although there's no link from this page, the link on the Fields of the Nephilim WP page to Andy Delaney redirects straight to the page for Big TV!: is this the same Andy Delaney? If so, the link should also be included on this page. Dom Kaos (talk) 00:57, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Andy Delaney

message: There was also a New Zealand band by this name, the lead singer was Paul Reid who used to be on Shortland Street.Number36 (talk) 05:21, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New Zealand band of the same name
Talk:Cyclone Warehouse

message: This article makes no sense. It begins "Cyclone Warehouse is a semi-autonomous zone..." What they hey is a semi-autonomous zone, in this context? Is it something like Kurdistan? Danzig? Sound like that, but then it starts going off about artists... I have place a no context tag, and if somebody doesn't straighten this out... Herostratus 20:04, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a simpler first line.  Also, I cleaned up the formatting and added references.  :) Rururudy 20:48, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, but it still says "semi-autonomous zone". What is that pray tell? Does it mean that the President of France and the Bishop of Urgell are co-princes? Or what? Do they have representation at the United Nations? Herostratus 16:29, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lonely Planet has a book on micronations -- many with no representation in the UN. .  I am not the expert, but I would propose that that area of town has little governance by the USA -- little to no city maintenance and less city 'protection' from the police.  Things have happened there -- on public land -- that don't happen on most streets without governmental interference. :)  Rururudy 20:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What is this?
Talk:Slade Hall

message: The house is here on rightmove http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-16738854.html. The estate agents blurb seems quite close to teh wikipedia but without a quoted source. Are they a copyvio or are both copied from a third sourceBilllion (talk) 20:03, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Estate agents blurb
Talk:Apache Ivy

message: I am currently adding more content to this page, please do not delete until I have a chance to flesh it out.
Also, this is my first WP edit, please be gentle.  Advice is encouraged.
I request that the page be allowed to live until 12 AM, 17 May 2007, to allow sufficient content to be added to satisfy the speedy deletion warning.
Cl4rk3 20:25, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, You have some time. Rettetast 21:39, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Can we please at least have some info about what this app even does? DarkAudit 04:06, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Upload/Uploadtext/en-ownwork

message: This message includes :Image:Exquisite-khelpcenter.png. That image is tagged as being superseded and more importantly is not protected, while the image that supersedes it, :Image:Information icon.svg, is protected. Please replace :Image:Exquisite-khelpcenter.png with :Image:Information icon.svg. Thanks – Gurch 20:19, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: - cohesion 01:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Wikipedia talk:Upload/Uploadtext/en-usgov

message: Superscript text
{sudo}
This message includes :Image:Exquisite-khelpcenter.png. That image is tagged as being superseded and more importantly is not protected, while the image that supersedes it, :Image:Information icon.svg, is protected. Please replace :Image:Exquisite-khelpcenter.png with :Image:Information icon.svg. Thanks – Gurch 20:19, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.--Commander Keane 00:53, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

message: 
In Step 3 of the U.S federal government upload page can a link be added to one of these tag pages:
*Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/USA (preferable since it is specifically for U.S tags only)
*Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/All#United States government
so that people can choose from a greater selection of copyright tags than are listed in the pulldown menu.
Also, in Step 3 can a note be added to copy and paste one of those tags to the bottom of the summary window if a tag can't be found in the pulldown selector menu.
Please see commons:MediaWiki talk:Uploadtext/fromgov#Copyright tags where this idea has already been discussed and implemented on the U.S. government upload form on the commons. --Timeshifter (talk) 13:44, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Look good? --- RockMFR 23:10, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Looks great. Might add something like this to the end of Step 3: Don't forget the  around each end of the license tag! --Timeshifter (talk) 01:27, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S. image copyright tags 

message: Could someone add the CDC public domain template  to the "License" selection dropdown? -- Jrtayloriv (talk) 01:51, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: CDC photos
Talk:Boothferry

message: The village is Booth not Boothferry the road is to the Ferry at Booth written correctly is Booth Ferry Rd
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a02:c7e:48c:3600:6955:bca:7f35:dffd (talk • contribs) 09:05, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Rival Factions

message: Also, since I couldn't find any article named "Rival Factions", could you also change the article name from "Rival Factions (album)" to "Rival Factions"? Thanks in advance.
--SKA-ed for Life 20:31, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Name

message: Is there enough information about this DVD to warrant article on it? Discuss ...
--SKA-ed for Life 15:24, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DVD - "I Want Something You Have"

message: maybe someone could put the different album covers here. 202.138.180.33 03:17, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The album covers

message: Project 86 Sixth album is a mix of industrial rock and post punk and gothic rock and hard rock and alternative metal sound all into a one genre this album is a good amazing and has all the things that have project 86 have but more powerful 2A00:23C5:4523:DD01:71EE:D6D4:DED5:F56B (talk) 21:26, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project 86
Talk:Synthetic monitoring

message: In fact synthetic transaction monitoring can be applied to monitoring databases, services, message queues, TCP/IP ports, or other areas. Therefore it is not, strictly speaking, a form of website monitoring. When I have time I will return to this page and deal with this. SunSw0rd 20:28, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Limited to Website Monitoring

message: This statement seems incorrect to me.  How can an external test script make requests to a web server without web traffic?
BenjaminGSlade (talk) 19:56, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: This type of monitoring does not require actual Web traffic

message: As someone with only the most rudimentary understanding of programming, I found this article so incomprehensible that I gave up half way through the first paragraph.  Someone with more familiarity should do a major rewrite of this page for the benefit of people who don't already know what synthetic monitoring is. --JDspeeder1 (talk) 01:50, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please consider the non-programmers in the audience 

message: What's the origin of the term? --Benklaasen (talk) 08:30, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Some more history, please
Talk:Heaven's Basement

message: Roadstar did spilt up, Heaven's Basement feature only 3 members of Roadstar. There was a 1 year gap inbetween Roadstar and Heaven's Basement.
Heaven's Basement no longer play any material from Roadstar, its a totally new band.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by CR83 (talk • contribs) 14:01, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision

message: Should the EP have it's on own page? Newsteadgirl (talk) 11:47, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: EP, have it's own page?

message: I was surprised to see question if HB meet the notability guideline for music. This is big mistake. I have been visiting England for 2 weeks. In that time I have seen them in last months Classic Rock Magazine and also in this months; in last weeks Kerrang Magazine and this weeks; in Rock Sounds magazine that has just come out and in The Sun Newspaper on 1st February. In addition Ive heard them on Radio 1 and Kerrang Radio and they are frequently on Sky TV (Scuzz) and I heard a 20 minute interview on Xfm radio. All of these are highly respected national publications (I think, but  XFM might just be London)
I must stress that these are what I have seen and heard in only 2 weeks in England, people at the gig I got to told me of many other newspapers, radios and TV and a simple google search shows very many online magazine articles.
All of these are "substantial", "non-trivial", "independent", and "reliable" publications. Very clear that my experience alone shows the criteria has been substantially succeeded just in these 2 weeks and the question about notability is a mistake that could easily be checked.
The same editor questions the neutrality of the article but the article reads very neutral to me, I can not work out what part of it caused him concern. If that editor would like to do the good job and explain his concerns here we could understand and correct if necessary but a general statement, with no explanation or evidence can not be addressed.
If he thinks the band are using Wiki for personal promotion they are not doing it very well as they have not even updated it to present their new album which is currently #9 in the BBC Album Chart. I think this is all a mistake.
I would add the Album myself but I'm new here and dont want to do it in a wrong way that will bring more criticizes. Maybe someone else will. I have put a sentence in the article.
I have removed those tags until anyone who has concerns tells what they are in here.
Thank you from Sweden Yoda Bignose (talk) 21:57, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Suits index

message: Created page for Suits index.  Comments are greatly appreciated. Perkinsms 20:32, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Question - does the Suits index work strictly using income as the base for progressive measurement?  Under sales, vat, or other consumption tax system - is the tax base of consumption used as the base or is income used as the base?  Using income can create an arbitrary relationship. If a rebate or exemption system were used in a sales tax model, how does the Suits index rate it.  For example, a excise on luxury items like a yatch.  A rebate on sales purchases can create an progressive effective rate on consumption - so while 100% of income is consumed on taxable goods, they may pay a 0% tax rate.  I'm asking as the current state of this article seems to base progressivity solely on an income base, which may or may not be accurate in the normal definition of progressivity.  Is this a limit of the Suits index and what it is designed to measure or are we excluding factors in the index that sould be included that measure other means of tax incidence. Morphh  (talk) 14:13, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  My guess is that unless the reporter of the Suits index (research paper author, etc.) says otherwise, the basis is economic income.  I'm working to secure the original 1977 paper (I work near the library of congress) since I don't really want to pay $10 to download it.  If I get my hands on the paper, the article will get much better.  It should be noted that the Suits index can be used to estimate the progressivity of any public policy.  I'm sure it would be possible if you had the data to calculate a Suits index for a consumption base, as it's just a matter of calculating areas under a Lorenz curve.  Cheers.  Perkinsms 19:52, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled