Talk:Dr. Who and the Daleks

message: A little help please - how did this film ever get on to the big screen? I've never seen it, but it looks like an insult to Doctor Who, a TV show which I love.--Codenamecuckoo 11:08, July 31, 2005 (UTC)
:It's actually not bad, in a cute sort of way, as long as you don't think to yourself that it's got anything to do with a television series called Doctor Who. It was made at the height of Dalekmania, in 1965, when you couldn't swing a dead cat without hitting a piece of Dalek merchandise, or kids running in playgrounds screeching EXTERMINATE and zapping their friends, teachers, parents and siblings. Aside from the elements of a human inventor named Doctor Who, with Barbara being his second granddaughter, a prepubsecent Susan, Barbara's boyfriend Ian and a very odd looking TARDIS interior, the rest is a not-bad high-adventure adaptation of The Daleks. Definitely higher production values. --khaosworks 11:14, July 31, 2005 (UTC)
::I just finished reading volume 1 of Miles and Woods About Time (the unofficial guide to Doctor Who), and they do a great job describing just how big Doctor Who was in the 60's.  
::Apropos of nothing, Khaosworks, but do you think this entry should still be classified as a stub?  What exactly is it lacking?Konczewski 20:52, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A more detailed plot summary could be done, for starters. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 22:36, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article currently gives the film's runtime as 83 minutes.  IMDb says it's 82.  Similarly, Daleks - Invasion Earth 2150 AD gives a runtime of 84 minutes, but IMDb gives 81 min. for that film.  I know that these things can vary depending on how the film is run, but does anyone know which is more accurate by whatever the standard measurement is? —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 08:11, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to my DVD boxset, the first film runs for 79 minutes while the second lasts 81 minutes. Home releases are probably the most reliable sources of runtime data. It would seem, therefore, that IMDb is only correct with its length for the second film, which I have already amended on Wikipedia. SuperMarioMan 22:38, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Runtime 

message: The article does not mention what company actually made this film (BBC make the TV Show, Big Finish make the Audio drams, but what company made the Dalek films?)--92.237.84.66 (talk) 13:50, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who made it? 

message: I'm not sure if project alerts are even functioning now since the actual toolserver is down. But in any case this project wouldn't get the alert since the tag isn't on the page. See: Talk:Dr. Who! (Tujamo and Plastik Funk song). 
BTW ...it would be helpful if anyone could establish (1) if the original Dr Who song ever had lyrics, (2) if this song in any way cites the BBC theme or otherwise has a connection to the TV series. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:32, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't the place for this discussion. This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dr. Who and the Daleks article. Further, even if the the song cites the BBC theme or has a connection to the Doctor Who TV series, this article refers to the first Dalek feature film, which didn't use the TV series theme. Move along, nothing to see here... Bowdenford (talk) 21:45, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Dr Who! song again

message: Early in the introduction, they make the mistake of calling the main character 'Dr. Who', instead of 'The Doctor'  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.53.150.2 (talk) 17:08, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not the purpose of Wikipedia to point out inconsistencies. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:20, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

text: In this film the character is actually called "Doctor Who" and not "the Doctor". It is not part of the TV series and does not follow the same conventions as the TV series. --Khajidha (talk) 17:23, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blasphemy 

message: Hi, could we please let the system work as intended? Both bots and editors need to know when dates were audited. Chaos would ensue if there were no system to show when that process happened. Thanks, Dawnseeker2000 15:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date auditing