Talk:Model-driven architecture

message: This article was previously nominated for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Model-driven architecture.  -Sean Curtin 23:49, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nominated for deletion 

message: In OMG's web site http://www.omg.org/mda/ MDA is named as "Model Driven Architecture". So should this article be named as "Model Driven Architecture" instead of "Model-driven architecture"? Currently Model Driven Architecture is redirect to this and reverse move requires administator to delete that page AFAIK, but what are capitalization etc. rules for article names? --Thv 08:36, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name capitalization etc. 

message: In the third paragraph, I dont understand the term "MM". It is not referenced anywhere else on the page... is it too obvious, or is it a common abreviation I am not aware of, or is it a mistake ? Nicolas1981 20:51, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is MM? 

message: Just curious, a poster above mentions the article on Model-Driven Development, but it doesn't seem to exist.  Was it deleted?  If so, why?  --Andrew Eisenberg 06:49, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Erm…no, that was just a silly typo on my part. I've fixed it now. —Caesura(t) 13:29, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is MDD article? 

message: Perhaps it should be mentioned that MDA has been trademarked by OMG.
The same is true for MDD
Only MDE is a generic term, not yet trademarked by OMG—The preceding unsigned comment was added by MDE (talk • contribs) .
Since 2004, MDD is no longer a Trademark of the OMG (see United States Patent and Trademark Office) -- Horron (talk) 13:20, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Respecting the Trademarks 

message: I have removed the links to specific MDA products and tools from the external links section. Wikipedia is not a soapbox for advertising or promoting products, or a list of links. Not to mention that the links to tools were dominating the list of external links, and taking up a large amount of page space (especially the ones that included promotional text touting the tool in question). There are several existing websites that offer far more comprehensive lists of MDA tools than the list that was here (including OMG's own MDA site). I have added a couple of external links to these existing websites as a substitute for the proliferation of links to individual products. --Allan McInnes (talk) 22:23, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to specific products and tools 

message: Do you know a game called bullshit bingo ? this article is almost unreadable if you don't have any(!) degree in comp. sci. - all the funny Abbrevations are fun, but not fun to read - it would be nice if someone could stretch the article a little bit ...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.245.121.186 (talk) 04:30, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  misc 

message: I think most of the introduction of the current article is too technical for a general audience. I noticed several points:
* The use of abbreviations is unacceptable
* This article is in need of an overview section, which explains some more about the basics. This section should talk about general items instead of starting with all kinds of specifications.
* A little history about the origins of this concepts will help the general audience to put it in perspective.
-- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 19:07, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too technical for a general audience 

message: While I believe that Executable UML is an important MDA technology, it doesn't require it's own section under this Wikipedia entry and is linked via the See also section. The cut and pasted text in the section is now out-of-date as well.
I recommend this section is removed, unless some original text can be added to show that it is an integral part of MDA. --Lwriemen 8:44, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Executable UML 

message: Section "MDA approach" (2nd paragraph) states: "One of the main aims of the MDA is to separate design from architecture.". The succeeding justification/explanation of the terms "design" and "architecture" is not satisfactory to me. It's misleading or at least it needs citation to verify where this statement comes from.
I don't see the difference in "design and architecture", since the process of design results in an architecture, how could you seperate this? In my opinion MDA does not seperate "design and architecture" but "design and implementation" or "requirements analysis and design/architecture".
-Guest --84.63.100.174 (talk) 16:29, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  MDA approach: seperating design from architecture vs. design from implementation 

message: it links to 'computer model' rather than to the 'system of abstractions' definition which seems more appropriate ----  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sybernut (talk • contribs) 03:31, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: have corrected that. --Tillmo (talk) 21:22, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  link to 'models' in " which are expressed as models." seems incorrect 

message: Hello there,
The link to first reference ("OMG pursues new strategic direction to build on success of past efforts") is obsolete. I was unable to find a newer link to this article after a quick research. Can anyone update this link? Thanks.
Wikifriendly, Epok__ (✉),  22:21, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obsolete link 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Model-driven architecture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081202033636/http://www.acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=396 to http://www.acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=396
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:29, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018)