Talk:X-COM: Terror from the Deep

message: Just wanted to point out that this is being sold on Steam.
I've seen other "old" game pages stating similar, but being a noob I'll just let someone else add it if it's considerd worth it. (also for me spelling is a big problem) --85.225.218.146 20:11, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sold on Steam 

message: :Image:XCOM TERROR.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:30, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: by Father Goose (talk) --Eruhildo (talk) 00:49, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:XCOM TERROR.jpg

message: Could someone tell me how, somehow:
#the in-game UFOpaedia, just posted on-line, is somehow "unrelibale sources".
#"isometric view" is (which links to Isometric projection) is somehow better than isometric view (which links to Video games with isometric graphics which is the article on the subject).
#"X-Com" is somehow better than X-COM (the correct name of bothe the organization and the game itself).
#"PC Zone" is somehow better than PC Zone (with italics because it was a magazine).
#http://uk.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/xcomterrorfromthedeep/review.html (as in: only the URL) is somehow better than X-COM: Terror From the Deep Review for PC - GameSpot (as in: an properly written external link with a name).
All of this you vandalized by GeoffB repeatedly... and this is hardly an isolated case.
I also just rewrote the article again, correcting some mistakes and expanding story to include the ending, cut some stuff elsewhere. --Asperchu (talk) 02:38, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:Reliable sources as to what is and what is not a reliable source by Wikipedia's standards.  If I'm a vandal, report me, and stop whining.  Geoff B (talk) 14:12, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Way to be disruptive (as usual) 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on X-COM: Terror from the Deep. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.pcgamer.com/reviews/1191.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:23, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified