lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Deletionist versus Inclusionist Controversy

message: Posting here since this doesn't concern the deletion debate itself: I find it very ironic that no one else, especially those calling to keep, sees fit to contribute to the article to resolve any of the issues. You're either basing your opinion of the article on its current state (the wrong way to go about participating in AfD), or you are basing it on the quality you think it would obtain if completely sourced, but this isn't really knowable unless you actually do the work, and we should all think that AfD doesn't come down to arbitrary personal judgments, even if it often does. Well, unless you are promoting some sensationalist view about Wikipedia's reputation and grand purpose... this is the real self-reference to avoid. –Pomte 22:27, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:The Beat (Sirius)

message: The article sections that talk about format changes are not appropriate. --KJRehberg (talk) 22:28, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research 
Talk:John Coxon (pirate)

message: I have removed this article from :Category:Pirates of the Caribbean, as that category is for subjects relating to the film. DuncanHill (talk) 01:48, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, good idea ;) I hadn't noticed it was there! BlackPearl14[talkies!•contribs!] 03:54, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 

message: Seventy guys, one canoe?
I raise the bullshit flag AND call "shenanigans" on this one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.5.200.58 (talk) 21:05, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  That's one hell of a canoe. 

message: :Category:17th-century people is a container cat, but I'm unsure what subcat is appropriate for this. --Slivicon (talk) 16:37, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorization 

message: It would be good to add some dates to the events in this article, because I'm unconvinced that they're correctly ordered. I've added Haring as a refidea (see top of talk page), since that source discusses relevant events in the autumn of 1679. —AlphaMikeOmega (talk) 17:12, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Chronology
Talk:Glass reinforced plastic

message: Let it be suggested then that wiki get a more respectable page on FRP being as how it is the future of many engineering fields. One paragraph if disgusting by any encyclopaedic standards, even a free ones. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 141.117.95.161 (talk • contribs) on 23 January 2008.
:I would appreciate, if someone impoves the article on fibre-reinforced plastic. It would be great if you have enough knowledge and time to expand it. You might also want to join the discussion at talk:glass-reinforced plastic. There are several other articles related to composite materials including that on glass-reinforced plastic which should be improved, too.--Vierzehn (talk) 18:21, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Karmaisking

message: hey, all i did was a dd a brief intro paragraph, and some sub-headings. where does that add up to POV-pushing? at least you folks realized that i actually exist, and I'm not a sock-puppet. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 22:44, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: note on procedure
File talk:Hyperbolic functions.svg

message: Just as an improvement the red lines presenting where the values for cosh and sinh are located are a bit missleading. I think that some people will interpret the red line to show the point on the axises' where that value is located. To show that it in fat means the distance on the paralel axis to the line curly-type indicators would be better i guess... Gillis (talk) 22:46, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Histone deacetylase 2

message: I think the problem with the overlinked is in the Interactions Section. I think it would be better to either remove this section or expand one sentence on each one of these enzymes. R00m c (talk) 12:50, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Overlinked

message: Hi,
I find the information on the amino acids surrounding the active site and the foot pocket very useful.
Yet I'm wondering if there isn't a mistake in the sequence numbering. According to the UniProt entry for the isoform 1, the text should read "The active site is connected to Gly150, Phe151, His179, Phe206, and Leu272. The footpocket is connected to Tyr25, Met31, Phe110, and Leu140.", although the numbering used in the article is consistent with the Bressi & al. paper.
Should we correct the numbering or leave it as taken from the paper and add a note that all residues numbers are shifted by 4 compared to the canonical sequence?
Perditax (talk) 15:02, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Residue numbering in the "Structure and Mechanism" section
Talk:HDAC3

message: The "Function" section should have sources, and more links to several of the definitions references to introduce HDAC3. What are the known targets of HDAC3? That information would be useful for this article. No biases, all information in this article is evidence based. However, the "Alternative functions" section should be more broad and talk about several Hdac3 deletion studies if it is going to be brought up.
There are no ongoing discussions on the Talk page. The article is rated as a Stub-Class article, and is part of the WikiProjects for Molecular and Cell Biology.—Ochitnis (talk) 23:36, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Reflections in a Golden Eye (novel)

message: The article for this novel does not give any possible source for its unusual title. Could it be that McCullers drew on the line - "Reflected from my golden eye." - in the poem "Lines for an Old Man" by T.S. Eliot? This was written, I believe, before 1934.
GianniBGood (talk) 13:40, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title source in T.S. Eliot's "Lines for an Old Man"?
Talk:HDAC7

message: If anyone wants to improve the article, I suggest to read this article : Hutt et al. Nat Chem Biol. 2010 Jan;6(1):25-33  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.105.137.207 (talk) 18:33, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  HDAC7 role in Cystic Fibrosis
Talk:HDAC11

message: T cells lacking HDAC11 have increased effector functions and mediate enhanced alloreactivity in a murine model. says "these data demonstrate a previously unknown role of HDAC11 as a negative epigenetic regulator of T-cell effector phenotype and function." - Lets see if its replicated/confirmed - or widely discussed. - Rod57 (talk) 11:01, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible role in T cell activity
Module talk:Location map/data/Bolivia

message: user:Blofeld of SPECTRE removed "Bolivia departments, blank.png" as it wasn't the actual map being used as of Jan 11, 2008.
I think,:image:Bolivia departments, blank.png is a very pretty map. Why not use it? Are there any errors? --Obersachse (talk) 23:09, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:Nigora

message: At least one major contributor to this article appears to have a close personal or professional connection to the topic, and thus to have a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting  (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request, or by clicking the link on the lowest yellow notice above. Requests that are not supported by independent reliable sources are unlikely to be accepted. 
Please also note that our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:19, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest
Talk:Tattershall

message: The name is article linked to that on Tom Thumb the storybook character but that article does not link him with the man whose gravestone is in Tattershall church.  The citation linked to Tattershall community website makes no apparent mention of the reputed height - which is given in the article in cm! (A unit invented in France almost two centuries later.)Citation to a work that gives the man's height would be appreciated.Cloptonson (talk) 20:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Tom Thumb

message: I fear that the section on the college reflects a common misunderstanding. Colleges were communities of secular priests or canons, not educational institutions. Tattershall Holy Trinity was a collegiate church, like many of the large medieval churches, with a community of resident priests The college was dissolved in 1545, as part of the abolition of chantries and colleges in Edward VI's reign. The relevant volume of the Victoria County History has a brief history of the college. As it happens, the priests were accused in Henry VIII's reign of neglecting the education of choristers. Sjwells53 (talk) 14:41, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The reigning monarch in 1545 was Henry VIII, Edward VI only succeeded in 1547.Cloptonson (talk) 21:28, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Colleges
Talk:Naked Blood

message: I just saw this film, and you have the plot wrong. The girls don't seek out the My Son drug. Eiji puts it into their IVs, that are for an experiment in contraceptives by his mother. They do not know they have had the My Son drug put into them, and neither does the mother. That's what makes the film so disturbing, is that they didn't choose to be a part of the experimentation of My Son. Violet yoshi (talk) 11:29, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Plot is wrong 

message: I don't know what the English says, I know but I don't get it, but apparently the japanese title has the word women and sadism in it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.77.30 (talk) 01:13, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  the title
Talk:North West Radio

message: The article uses the "Western People"  as a source. It should be pointed out that the "Western People" (along with other local newspapers) is a shareholder in the station and that its coverage of controversies involving NWR and/or MWR tends not to be exactly impartial. 94.0.215.167 (talk) 10:16, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Western People

message: The article states. Many people in the south of County Donegal would have preferred to have received Highland Radio from Letterkenny instead of N.W.R., or Ocean FM, for that matter, from Sligo Town.
Is there anything to back this up ? A preference for (County Donegal based) Highland over either of the Sligo based stations is understandable but why would a Donegal listener be more more likely to prefer Ocean over Northwest than a listener elsewhere in the franchise area ? 
Also worth mentioning that many parts of South Donegal can get Highland anyway and many parts of North Mayo and Sligo can get both Midwest and Ocean. Such listeners now benefit from having a choice of stations which they didn't really have with Northwest (as most of Northwests programmes were the same as Midwest). Other than the Donegal statement the article does seem rather biased against Ocean. It doesn't state whether or not Ocean has matched the listenership figures achieved by Northwest or whether Oceans programing has proved to be more diverse, of higher quality or has served the locality better. 90.199.167.57 (talk) 22:03, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Donegal
Talk:Actinoleuca campbelli macquariensis

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Whpq (talk) 12:52, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Travis Stork

message: Obviously PR agency account is working on this article.  Tagging til they stand down. Jytdog (talk) 03:45, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: COI

message: I changed the box on the right to also mention the divorce after reading something about this quickly on the help desk page, and it looks like it was already changed in the rest of the article so making the box on the right consistent.  -KaJunl (talk) 19:33, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, if it's decided that the source isn't reliable, maybe anything about his marriage can just be deleted.  Is it really so notable that it needs to be in this article to begin with?  -KaJunl (talk) 19:37, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  divorce 

message: The article is kinda sparse.  I'm not sure how reliable this source is, but at least it lists his specific date of birth (March 9, 1972), along with a few miscellaneous personal details. 
What Happened to Travis Stork - News & Updates
63.92.241.249 (talk) 04:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  DOB 

message: This: "2014 study in the British Medical Journal determined" -- It is inappropriate to include that detail in his biographical entry here. However accurate or inaccurate it may be, this isn't about him. It's a broad statement that does not apply to him specifically. If someone can find a detail about this that applies directly to him, then that's appropriate. It looks like a sloppy attempt to balance whatever controversy might be perceived in him. But it's so broad that it applies to many more people than him, and as such it really belongs in a separate article on TV doctors.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.178.228.126 (talk) 20:18, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unrelated fact should be removed. 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 23:46, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Travis Lane Stork →  – WP:COMMONNAME, sources almost universally refer to the subject as Travis Stork, not by his full name. I'm honestly surprised that it wasn't under the common name prior, given its conciseness. JeffSpaceman (talk) 22:38, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 April 2024
Talk:Honda Vigor

message: This article could benefit from photos of the JDM Honda Vigor first and second generations. (Regushee (talk) 15:07, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Logan Talk Contributions 17:07, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

message: Where's the engine? – especially for the third gen.  From this article, it's a fairly common (Audi-like) FWD, front-engine design. There's a transaxle behind the engine (as this article states). 
However the Front mid-engine, front-wheel-drive layout article claims that it uses that layout – where the engine is behind the transaxle, as for some Renaults and Citroens. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:49, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engine layout
Talk:Memetic algorithm

message: I have extended the previous stub to a fully-fledged article. I acknowledge my debt with my English teacher, Ellen, for a very encouraging review process. I have used some ‹div› tags to make internal links to some bulleted list items, but the layout of those items has been somewhat altered. Josedavid (talk) 08:44, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't see any Lamarckian learning on wiki at all and all I can find is the Baldwin effect, which I think should be expanded to discuss it as a learning process. Maybe these should be listed briefly on this page which could some day migrate to their own pages?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.135.223.100 (talk) 23:54, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections or pages for Lamarckian and Baldwinian learning? 

message: Since most implementations of the memetic approach are done with the help of EAs, an appropriately adapted pseudocode has been added. A section on the theoretical rationale for MAs has also been added.
The template on Wikipedia's quality standards that section headings should not be phrased as questions has been removed because the headings have been changed. I don't think it looks any better now, though. The recommendation may be appropriate in many cases, but what better wording for questions to be decided than questions? Studi90 (talk) 11:27, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remarks on revisions and additions from February 2023
Talk:Don Elder

message: It isn't very well written...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.189.142.162 (talk) 05:41, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If you would like this page nominated for deletion, please go over the deletion policy and the alternatives to deletion first. If you still believe it should be deleted, you need to follow all three steps at WP:AFDHOWTO. Note that this requires you to register an account. If you do not wish to register an account, you may leave me a message on my talk page with a detailed rationale for deletion, and if your rationale is remotely within policy, I can complete a nomination on your behalf. —KuyaBriBriTalk 21:00, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page should be deleted or fixed
Talk:Citroën C3

message: The section about the second generation desperately needs a rewrite. It sounds like someone got the information from a Citroën brochure or something. Chevymontecarlo. 18:50, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second generation section rewording. 

message: The second generation C3 has been recently released in Brazil. It has a few differences with the European version.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.108.89.82 (talk) 03:08, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  South American C3 

message: So I created a table out of a list, but some items also had 'Airdream+' or 'Auto' added near the end of the list. 'Auto' may mean type of transmission, but I don't understand how or where to categorize the 'Airdream+' moniker. I know it's probably a marketing term on Citroën's part, but confusing when some engine trim levels are called "Airdream", while some other non-Airdream+ trim levels can have what appears to be the Airdream+ pack. So someone in the know should clear up the confusion. -Mardus (talk) 17:42, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Citroën C3#Variants|Variants]]: Airdream+ and Auto 

message: "The C3 is the fastest product sold in the world"
What does this even mean??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.144.76.131 (talk) 14:12, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fastest product sold in the world??? 

message: Diea it have a spare tyre 86.4.201.129 (talk) 16:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spare tyre
Talk:Citroën Saxo

message: This article is weird, for a start the fact that the car was facelifted is only mentioned once in passing, but there are many other problems. there are weird modifyng ideas, and the over use of "By modern Standards", yet this car is only one generation old and thus still reasonably modern. It also seems to have been written solely from a UK point of view and misses off alot about special editions, notably the LHD only Bic special edition which marked an important aniversary for bic.(Morcus (talk) 15:38, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work to be done. 

message: This model wasn't built in Vigo, Spain. http://www.vigo.psa-peugeot-citroen.com/index.php?id=203 87.221.72.174 (talk) 15:27, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Where you are sure of your ground, and especially where you can quote a plausible source, there's nothing to stop you entering the correction.   Except that now I've done it.   Regards Charles01 (talk) 17:03, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  It wasn't built in Vigo, Spain. 

message: I have seen an electric version of the Saxo parked outside our house (in Norway). Seems it is mentioned at the Citroën Berlingo électrique page. Searching for "citroen saxo electric" and "citroen saxo electrique" gives quite a few hits. --V79 (talk) 08:09, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citroën Saxo électrique
Talk:Scheduling of Emmerdale

message: In my TV listings magazine, and in the Radio Times which I have just checked online, the episode broadcast 29/01 was called Shot by Both Sides. However, the editor who added the title as Blood Betrayal was also correct, as this was what was displayed at the beginning of the episode. I have thus put both titles in the text with an explanatory note. I wonder whether this is a one-off or whether this has happened with previous titled episodes and I have just not noticed? Also, this is something to watch out for in the future. I have added the episode titles for the next two weeks from the Radio Times (online), so look out at the start of their broadcast and check that they have the same name. TomPhil 18:02, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that the Radio Times have now changed next week's episode title to Fair Game, which is clearly wrong, as that was the title given for this week's episode. I'm getting very confused as to why every episode seems to have two or more names (both of which, incidentally, seem to fit the episode in question, which seems to dispel the suggestion that they are just included in error). Although I am getting the "alternate titles" from the Radio Times, it is not just this magazine that is printing these titles as I have seen others doing so also. I suppose ultimately the authoratitve title is that shown at the beginning of the episode, but I'll continue to add both for now, unless anyone else has any suggestions. TomPhil 23:54, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Shot by Both Sides

message: """Scottish Television used the 7pm slot to show daily regional programmes resulting in Emmerdale moving to 5:10pm. Scottish Television had always given preference to their own countryside soap opera Take the High Road, which was accommodated in a 7pm slot. After only several months in the earlier slot Scottish returned Emmerdale to the 7pm slot"""""
I know this say this in the 1990 -1992 Section BUT STV Moved it AGAIN in sometime 1995 - 1998 back to 5.10 Tuesday, wed, Thursdays! This was stop in 1998 For a new line, fro 5.10pm taking H&W and 6pm getting other programmers, mainly other networked show  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.205.118.64 (talk) 21:56, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Scheduling in Scotland
Talk:List of Emmerdale spin-offs and merchandise

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Emmerdale Films and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 26#Emmerdale Films until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  – DarkGlow • 22:33, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Emmerdale Films" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]