lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Front kick

message: Perhaps this article should be moved to Front kick (Taekwondo) as there is already a short description of the basic front kick under kick.--Daveswagon 14:25, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That or remove the heavy slant that implies TKD own the kick. Did some but needs a re-write --Nate1481( t/c) 10:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Looks like actual text should be indeed moved or needs heavy edit. Current article is about TKD front kick, not front kick in general. Otherwise some parts look plain wrong (like one on application of front kick) and biased 23:54, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Taekwondo

message: Umm... Armyboy here is using a sidekick in the second image. That's not a frontkick at all. It's also not a good thing that he is obviously pushing somewhat in the first image (since his knee is above a straight line from his hip to the target). That may be a variant of the front kick which is easier to use with shoes and the lot, but it is not what is practiced in karate, taekwondo, hapkido, etc.. Actually all chinese, japanese and korean styles I can think of at the moment try to avoid that pushing unless it's meant to be a push, which is a different action altogether. The method of kicking shown in the picture is the kind they teach in "street safe" courses and military training camps, not the pure front kick of the established martial arts.
I couldn't agree more. Glad it was changed. Ravstein 06:18, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The picture is wrong 

message: The kick article mentions the term "teep", but this article doesn't. It should. – kentyman (talk) 03:43, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teep 

message: He is NOT the Bruce Lee of our time, i acknowledge that whoever added that in was a big fan of modern day MMA and most likely the UFC as well and saw his friend Anderson kick Belfort at event 126, but you sort of came off like a fanboy and i couldn't tell if you were just vandalizing or not. I am going to remove it (the Bruce Lee part) but i will leave the first sentence about him perfecting the kick because we still haven't seen somebody else use the kick to great effect on a bigger stage except for Anderson whom he helped perfect it. Anderson acknowledges that Seagal helped him perfect the kick.
--Eidetic Man (talk) 22:48, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steven Seagal
Talk:David Wilkie (artist)

message: There is a lot of great information here. Just needs to be reorganized and broken up into coherent sections.
P0per 06:20, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 'In the works which Wilkie produced in his final period he punched his own mother in the face, with the detailed handling, the delicate finish ...'
I would personally change it back I've no clue what it should be changed to. --98.215.162.228 (talk) 06:56, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism?
Talk:Elections in South Korea

message: I don't understand what makes the Korean name of the National Assembly of South Korea particularly relevant here.  Those who want to know the name can easily find it in that article.  -- Visviva 13:08, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: At least they can after I fix that link. -- Visviva 13:09, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

text: There is no reason to put it in bold; if it is in bold, it looks like this article is more relevant to the NA than to the president. Wikipeditor 15:05, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Korean name
Talk:Byzantine (disambiguation)

message: There are probably a lot of other things that can be disambiguated here, judging by the amount of "Byzantine X" topics we have. Maybe it is better like this, rather than a redirect...I don't know. But now that it's not a redirect, there are probably hundreds of things that should go to Byzantine Empire that go here. And it's probably my fault, since I am always too lazy to make a proper link... Adam Bishop 06:38, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: I am working on fixing things that are linking to this page. This seems like a useful dab page to me so far. The strange thing is that there is a page titled Byzantine (disambiguation) that redirects to this one. I think it should be the other way around:  The info on this page should go on the  Byzantine (disambiguation) page, and this page should be a plain redirect until such a time as someone finds a need for an article to develop here that is something more than dab. --Iggle 09:09, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usefulness of  "Byzantine" dab page 

message: I think that Byzantine should redirect to Byzantine Empire, with a dab page linked from there. Almost everything I see that links here is in reference to the empire, and articles such as Byzantine architecture, its language and a list of its emperors, are all linked to on the Byzantine empire page anyways. We can still create a dab page for them (and the others at the bottom unrelated to the empire), but it does not seem to be logical for Byzantine to not link redirect to Byzantine Empire. --Gregorof 09:09, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not... I came across something similar with Boxer. Every single link (about 230) should have been boxer. However, in that case i don't think that it should have been changed. In Byzantine... since it's pretty much inextricably linked, I would marginally agree with you. There may be some policy or guideline that I'm overlooking though. --Storkk 09:53, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Agree.  The term "Byzantine" inherently refers to the Empire, either literally or figuratively, so Byzantine Empire is clearly the primary topic referred to by Byzantine.  This page should redirect to Byzantine Empire with a  hatnote at the top for "Byzantine".  --Russ (talk) 10:55, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, pending no objections I will go ahead and do that. --Gregorof 04:04, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not here
Talk:Juan Ponce de León

message: May you pls put source 174.76.113.101 (talk) 14:47, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 15:02, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 2 May 2022 

message: in section" First Voyage to Florida, 8th paragraph, it says: it would soon become the primary route for eastbound ships leaving the Spanish Indies bound for Europe Correction: ships leaving the Spanish West Indies, (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_West_Indies) WeatherOrg (talk) 14:44, 14 October 2022 WeatherOrg (talk) 18:15, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Juan Ponce de Leon - Correction: Spanish West Indies 

message: Please remove the errant ref tag here:
* </ref>
Thanks. 76.14.122.5 (talk) 20:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Jamedeus (talk) 21:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 May 2024
Talk:Anti-worm

message: This page and Helpful worm are both listed as orphaned articles, though Helpful Worm seems to have at least a few links to it. (I haven't checked on links pointing to this article; I hit the other one via Stumble Upon and didn't intend to spend as much time as I have looking at this.) Should the two be merged? --Short Circuit (talk) 19:24, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. Both are articles on cyber-security jargon, but that does not mean that they shouldn't be merged and instead use a redirect. Helpful worm, while linked more, contains a lot less content. Kjerish (talk) 18:36, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Christocentrism

message: I've seen this term used in ecumenical and syncretic groups to refer to more Christian-oriented practices within them- is this a separate definition, or just a misunderstanding of the term?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.2.40.144 (talk) 13:22, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ecumenical groups

message: There is a related term known as pneumatocentrism which describes religious teachings that tend to focus on the Holy Spirit instead of Christ, such as the Charismatic Movement. When theologians focus on the divine Father, the associated term is theocentrism, while Church-centered discourse is called ecclesiocentrism. This could perhaps be mentioned in the article. ADM (talk) 08:04, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pneumatocentrism

message: There is a clear bias towards trinitarianism, which does not describe "Christianity," and there are many politically incorrect generalizations. Just because Catholicism is Christian, does not at all mean that Catholicism is all of Christianity, there are other beliefs. It needs to be less biased towards Catholicism. 206.180.218.213 (talk) 16:21, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very outdated
Talk:Agnomen

message: "An Agnomen is a nickname or an alias. It is not a pseudonym as it is a real name."
But the wikipedia link to alias redirects to pseudonym. Me am confused. --Bacteria 16:59, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem

message: The plural of agnomen is agnomina. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ultor Solis (talk • contribs) 20:22, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: For the record
Talk:JHOVE

message: Today I just saw the result of the deletion debate, which I hadn't previously been aware of.  Just a couple of clarifying notes: The original entry wasn't created by any of us at OIS, so it wasn't a "vanity" entry in that sense. Eventually I got around to expanding the article, after the discussion (which I didn't know about) had happened.  I wrote most of the JHOVE code, so perhaps it's now a vanity article. :) But I hope it's more useful with the expansion. GMcGath 10:14, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note on deletion debate 

message: JHOVE is currently up to v1.9 (Project page). I don't know about the backward compatibility, so I'm going to ask the developer to check and update the page. --Thnidu (talk) 22:05, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs updating 
Talk:Moiety

message: Isn't the chemical meaning identical to that of Functional group?
--Cancun771 17:45, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

message: This was tagged in July 2009. No reason was given, but several reasons were obvious, which I've addressed, I think. I left the cu tag on in case anyone felt there was more to be done. I'll check again in a couple of days, and if there's no more suggestions then I'll remove the tag. Thanks, Boleyn2 (talk) 18:15, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up
Talk:Åland Islands dispute

message: Tuomas: Please explain why you think 15% of the mainland population (i.e. the Swedish-speaking) considered themseves to be Swedish??? This appears very POV.
I can see  your point in that the Ålanders considered themselves Swedish, but not the mainland Swdish speakers. I am of Swedish-speaking Finnish descent myself (Hangö, Bromarv), and none of my grandparents or other relatives EVER considered themselves to be Swedes at that time (1917)! User: 85.76.95.40
There's lot's of discussion about this. My understanding, based on following these discussions, is that the Ålanders have a quite different identity compared to the Swedish speakers in Finland. I'm not sure exactly what the differences are, but generally it seems that they see themselves as more Swedish than the Swedish speakers in Finland.
Osli73 21:12, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Articles history has a deleted statement: "Swedish diplomats tried to deceive the League of Nations by distributing faked maps that translated the Åland's main islands circa 20 km towards the Swedish coast." I recall that an YLE document G. J. Ramstedtin maailma mentions that the Swedish diplomats really offered faked maps to other diplomats. Perhaps this is a historical fact that should be inculed in the article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.93.216.248 (talk) 10:36, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  On political dispute 

message: In 1921, again despite the fact that 90 percent of the islands' population was Swedish — and that they expressed an almost unanimous desire of being incorporated into Sweden — the League of Nations determined that the Åland Islands should remain under Finnish sovereignty,
This article is clearly pushing a point of view and needs a complete re-write. --Kieran Bennett 08:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I added the refimprove tag as in the very few places that this article does cite references it is only of one source and most of the article is not referenced at all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Allie cabab (talk • contribs) 11:57, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: references
Talk:Bai people

message: Ok, now we need an article on the Bai language.
Gringo300 07:25, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bai language 

message: Sometime I've read this quote: "Bai is Thai ethnic in some meaning !". Is that right ? Who can give me the explaination? What's the real relation between the Bai and the Thai ethnics ?
Thanks,--Redflowers (talk) 05:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bai is the Thai ethnic in some meaning? 

message: gosguppl=tards  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.175.26.140 (talk) 13:22, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  pAr se nodrshit 
Talk:Bonan people

message: tell the NAME of the language the Bonan speak. Gringo300 07:27, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the name of the language to the article. Gringo300 07:15, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The article should 

message: How can the ancestors of the Bonan be both Muslim soldiers and Lamaists? There should be a clarification. — Stevey7788 (talk) 21:47, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: The picture descriptions in commons say nothing about them being bonans, and theres two other muslim ethnic groups in Jishishan. J.K Nakkila (talk) 15:38, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures
Talk:Bouyei people

message: For dedicated editors of this page: The "Related Groups" info was removed from all  infoboxes. Comments may be left on the Ethnic groups talk page. Ling.Nut 20:24, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "related groups" info removed from infobox 

message: Where in Vietnam do they live? Badagnani 08:46, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where? 

message: Hello, 
most groups are lacking a wikilink. What should be done?
Kind regards––Sarcelles (talk) 10:31, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subgroups
Talk:Palaung people

message: Another article that needs to tell about the language the ethnic group speaks...
Gringo300 07:34, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Language

message: How is De'ang pronounced?  Is it D'ang, Dae Ang, or Dee eng?  Judging on how the language sounds, I suppose D'ang. CanCanDuo 16:51, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: Mention of Blang should be made in this article. 173.88.241.33 (talk) 18:45, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Blang]]
Talk:Gelao languages

message: I seem to be unable to put up a link to the article on the ethnic group itself. Gringo300 07:44, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nanai people

message: The main page should be Nanai, and Hezhe should re direct to Nanai, simply because there are
more Nanai in Russia than Hezhe in China, and Nanai is the closest name to what these people call
themselves, which is "Nani".  The Hezhe of China do not call themselves Hezhe.
Another article that needs to tell about the language of the people... --Gringo300 07:47, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 06:55, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Aisin Gioro Y chomosome DNA was found in "Xibe, Outer Mongolians, Inner Mongolians, Ewenki, Oroqen, Manchu, and Hezhe" males and number around 1 million people. Their ancestor was Nurhaci's grandfather Giocangga, whose descendants made up the Qing dynasty nobility. But the Y chromosome was not found in the general Han Chinese population.
The Y chromosome cluster is specifically C3c, part of the General Haplogroup C-M217, which Genghis Khan's lineage is a part of, although the Manchu Aisin Gioro Y chromosome is part of a different cluster than Genghis Khan's
The reason it spread among these specific minority groups, but not among the Han Chinese population, is because the Qing Manchu nobility was concentrated specifically in the ethnically Manchu Eight Banners and not in the Mongolian and Han Eight Banners, and the specific ethnic groups which made up the Manchu Eight banners were "Manchu, Mongolian, Daur, Oroqen, Ewenki, Xibe".
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1285168/
http://www.cell.com/ajhg/pdf/S0002-9297(07)63394-1.pdf
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002929707633941
http://www.genebase.com/learning/article/23
Rajmaan (talk) 21:37, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Qing dynasty Aisin Gioro Y chromosome DNA found in Nanai 
Talk:Operation Lifeline Sudan

message: Peer Review by James Gunn:
Work I am reviewing: Daniel Hershfield Operation Lifeline Sudan 
Lead Evaluation:
The lead paragraph is a robust summary of Operation Lifeline Sudan (OLS). It provides all the important information while remaining brief. 
Content Evaluation: 
This user has yet to expand upon the lead paragraph. It is clear from there lead that they have a few avenues they can pursue. I suggest they look at the history leading up to OLS and the timeline as it happened. 
Tone and Balance Evaluation:
This article has a neutral tone throughout. None of the claims appear to be heavily biased towards a particular position. I do not think any viewpoints were over or underrepresented. None of the information seemed to be persuading the reader to favor one side over the other.
Sources and References Evaluation:
The first source directed me to the UN page but said that it no longer existed. I am sure the user will add more sources as they expand on their research. 
Organization Evaluation:
The lead paragraph was well organized. The order of information made sense. As you continue I suggest you create a few sub sections (history, timeline, etc) to make it easier for the reader to navigate through your article. 
Images and Media Evaluation:
The article has one map of Sudan that shows how the country is divided and where the major roads and train lines are located. It is a helpful addition to the article. 
New Article Evaluation:
This article meets the minimum requirement of two sources for it to be considered notable. I am sure the user will add more sources as they continue. 
Overall Evaluation:
The article is a strong introduction into the topic. The lead paragraph does a good job setting up the rest of the article to come. 
JamesAGunn (talk) 22:31, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Astromech droid

message: I'd like to know where this information came from. The R5 series replaces R2 units in the EU as far as I'm aware, unless the pilot of a starfighter already owned an R2 unit or only R2's were available. Also, R2 units develop personality traits and get named (Artoo, Whistler, Shiner, Jawaswag etc), as do R5's (Mynock), and yet Wedge Antillies R5-G8 (Gate) unit seems to develop no personality even after years of service.
*Some of this information appears to come from the various role playing game sourcebooks. -- saberwyn 22:08, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

message: One bizarre feature of R2-D2 in the Star-Wars film is that he cannot speak, but rather "speaks" in beeps which can only be understood by C3PO. This never made any sense to me - I guess it looked cute to Lucas, but it doesn't make any engineering sense. Obviously, contemporary technology does allow droids to speak, so why not R2?
The reason given in this article "The likely reason is to conserve space that would be used, speakers for example are useless in a vacuum." Is quite unlikely. First of all, the hardware involved would not take up a lot of space (I didn't see C3PO have any problems in that area). Second, R2 already *can* speak, with beeps, so apparently he must have some speakers already! All that's missing is a speech generation chip or software or whatever - something which obviously exists in the Star Wars fictional universe.
84.108.167.132 (talk) 07:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If everything was suppose to make sense, then people might start asking why all the aliens usually humanoid in shape and size, and everyone can breath the same air wherever they go.  Or if you could make droids that smart, why need human labor for anything at all?  Don't expect everything to make sense.  Its just entertainment.  Dream Focus 12:33, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cannot speak 

message: R2D2 clearly is more then a simple droid; his constant zany (for lack of a better word) behaviour, in the films, leads me to believe that he isn't really a robot, but a diminutive half-human warrior with a funny grin, with a robotic shell for show!
...seriously though, is R2 sentient? Perhaps in a similar way to an infant child?--CaptainSurrey talk
Sort of... You see, RD-D2 is a royal Naboo astromech (they make the best kind) and he has never had his memory wiped, ever. So it's possible Artoo is semi-sentient. Superstarwarsfan 16:50, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He had his memory wiped at the end of Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith.  Maybe be of royal design, they added in more chips or whatnot, allowing him to be far more than any other.  Dream Focus 12:36, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infantile Quirks 

message: T3-M4 (from the Knights of the Old Republic series) is not, in point of fact, an astromech droid, but a 'utility droid', and a custom built one at that. Wannablessedbe 11:43, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  T3-M4
Talk:Vincent Connare

message: This guy also has a website (at http://www.connare.com) but
I can't get past the front page.  It has the audacity
to tell me off for having the "wrong" version of
Macromedia Flash.  Thus I don't feel motivated
to link to it.  If anyone can provide a link to a
suitable page inside the website then we could link there.
Richard W.M. Jones 08:16, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Website

message: Why are there so many external references leading to sites and articles about the controversy over Comic Sans when there isn't a mention of that controversy in the article. We either need to add something about that controversy to this article and how it relates to Mister Connare, or this nonsense should be removed, as none of it relates to him, only to something he created that people, a decade on, have decided they hate. 216.41.16.82 (talk) 16:38, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comic Sans

message: Why is "God" in the See Also section for this guy?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.104.212.15 (talk) 02:19, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  See Also Section 

message: It should be noted that the subject of this article wrote a significant portion of this article and even uploaded his own photograph. He also may have contributed anonymously through one of the IP addresses in the UK... Stevenmitchell (talk) 23:14, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The subject of the article contributed heavily to the article itself
Talk:John Henry Williams (baseball)

message: http://www.minorleaguenews.com/features/raves/articles2004/030804.html suggests he died in Feb 2004, not March.  Could the editorial be dated wrong? Josh Parris#: 01:37, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death 