Talk:Doctorate

message: The article says that research doctorates are awarded (obviously as the name suggests) on the basis of completion of original research that is publishable in a peer-reviewed vehicle and represents "at least a modest contribution" to knowledge in the area to which the research is related. I believe the use of the term "modest" understates somewhat the requirements for a research doctorate. Most universities in the US require an extensive body of original research that makes a  so-called substantial or significant contribution to existing knowledge. The contribution can be narrow, but should not be modest as suggested by the article. 
Also, it should be emphasized that, contrary to higher doctorates like the LL.D or the Litt.D, a research doctorate like the Ph.D is always awarded by examination. In the US, that takes the form of one or more preliminary/qualifying exams in addition to the final oral exam. 161.24.19.112 (talk) 20:33, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Research Doctorates 

message: Hello. This article has borne edit tags for sometime and I'd like to get it up to par. I've archived a couple years' worth of talk, and I created a new List of doctoral degrees awarded by country to help get some of the lists off this page. If you notice weird things in the next couple weeks, bear with me or simply comment on the talk page here. Any help appreciated. Thanks! --Eustress (talk) 01:36, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article overhaul 

message: I recently removed the following phrase because it doesn't make sense, I'm guess due to translation issues. If the original poster (User:Carau) would please present the text here in Spanish (or Castilian), I would be happy to offer translation so it makes sense in English. Thanks. (Text to follow:)
Regarding the recognition of the PhDs programs, the 46 section of the Higher Education Act N° 24.521, sets out that the National Commission for University Evaluation and Accreditation must provide the PhD validation prior completion of a Major or Master degreeQuality Standards Higher Education Quality in Argentina, in Castilan: Especialización o Maestría, all of them by stating a fully agree with the standards set forth by the Department of Education, Science and Technology together with the Universities Council.
--Eustress (talk) 01:54, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Argentina issues 

message: Should this be included in some way?  which is a diploma mill  but some unexpected people have their 'degrees'. (Unsigned comment by User:Dougweller)
:From my research, it does not appear this "degree" is yet notable, so I would be against its inclusion. --Eustress (talk) 20:14, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Grand PhDs' - diploma mills? 

message: "There are no first degree doctorates but medical students can obtain a "Dr.med" after one semester of mostly undergraduate research or data evaluation. The "Dr med" is not equivalent to a PhD but to a masters degree. Medical Students going into research can obtain a genuine doctorate (PhD) in some subjects, such as molecular medicine or human biology."
</br> That's technically incorrect. Although German med students can complete the doctoral thesis during undergraduate studies, the Dr. med. is legally not equivalent to a masters degree, but to any other kind of German doctorate. The  masters-level professional degree in medicine is the State Examination - taken after 6 to 7 years of undergraduate studies - which must be completed before the doctoral degree can be officially awarded. Also, it is true med students can take a second "genuine" research doctorate, i.e., a Dr. rer. nat., however it is rather uncommon to do so. Most medical researchers and professors did not take a second doctorate, but prefered to proceed to habilitation. Hope this helps. Fred Plotz (talk) 14:35, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. As you can tell, the section is very poorly sourced, so any sourced contributions are welcome. --Eustress (talk) 14:51, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I can provide sources, but they are all German. Don't know if this is very helpful in this respect. Fred Plotz (talk) 14:57, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I can't find any policy on that, but it would be better than what we currently have. The WP:Cite web template has a field to indicate the language (|language= ). Thanks. --Eustress (talk) 15:13, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I'm going to change that and expand the Germany section a little. But it might take a day or two. So long! Fred Plotz (talk) 16:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

text: You can change your Personalausweis so that the Dr. is stated there, but that does _not_ change your name. It is an addition to your name, not a part of your name. See for instance http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akademischer_Grad#Akademische_Grade_als_Namenszusatz --Biologos (talk) 15:19, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

text: I guess it depends exactly what you mean by "name": some people and/or jurisdictions make a distinction between someone's personal name, their title and whatever postnominal letters they might be entitled to.  In the UK, for example, the whole thing tends to be left fairly nebulously defined, and as long as you're not trying to misrepresent yourself for fraudulent purposes, nobody usually minds.  In Germany, though, I believe the law is rather stricter, and from what I can tell there is a careful legal distinction made between one's personal name, title(s) and postnominal letters. -- Nicholas Jackson (talk) 10:49, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Germany 

message: I'm sorry that I don't have more time to improve the history section right now.  But in my research of the J.D. article, I know that there is more specific information out there on this topic. For example, this source is useful: Herbermann, et al. (1915). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Encyclopedia Press.  The article section as it exists is very vague and not useful.  I expect that is the reason why it was removed in the first place (I didn't remove it). Zoticogrillo (talk) 02:21, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: It is not useful to include a long list a professional doctorates, particularly when the long list includes less common doctorates that are all in the medical field. Zoticogrillo (talk) 08:20, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  list of professional doctorates 

message: I've removed this from the short list of example research doctorates, because (a) that paragraph only needs a few examples, which it already has, and (b) the PhD is already mentioned a sentence or two earlier.  (It's also not clear to me why the PhD in Management warrants an (admittedly comprehensive and well-sourced) article of its own, when there are large numbers of other subjects in which it is possible to do a PhD, but which don't have a separate article of their own.  I may be missing an important point here, though, and I'm happy to be corrected.) -- Nicholas Jackson (talk) 15:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  PhD in Management 

message: I have read the Forni article recently cited to by editor Viscountrapier in support of his recent edit re terminal degrees and professional doctorates.  The article does not support the claim for which the citation is offered.  However, interestingly, it does state that, quoting other sources: that a professional doctorate such as the N.D. or M.D. is a doctorate, there are distict tracts of professional and research degrees, that neither is necessarily superior to the other, and that doctorates (including professional doctorates) are the highest degrees in a particular field and in the particular tract (see pp. 431-432).  All of which supports the content previously in tact, and reverted to by editor Nicholas. Zoticogrillo (talk) 21:08, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viscountrapier edits re terminal degrees and citation to Forni article, "Models for Doctoral Programs" 

message: There is NEW GRAND Doctor of Philosophy Degree (Grand PhD) and can be given by WIDU.us official site. It is known as "SUPER PhD" degree. To obtain this degree, the candidate must already possess PhD degree and must complete 100 scientific papers and did 3 monographs (Dissertations) and have participated with least 10-20 PhDs.
This degree is highest possible in the world, is also rarest degree and is MUCH higher than ALL doctorate degrees includes MDs. HOWEVER, they are research based doctorate degree only, not medical doctorate degree. Once anyone get GRAND PhD (SUPER PhD) degree, their degrees CANNOT be revoked by anyone for life!
Danielcg (talk) 00:25, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This would seem to be roughly analogous to the tier of "higher doctorates" awarded by universities in the UK, Ireland, and some Commonwealth countries (where an eminent academic with a strong research record will sometimes submit a portfolio of their most influential and important peer-refereed work for formal consideration for the award of a DSc, DLitt, etc).  However, the World Information Distributed University seems to be of questionable provenance (see here, here and here for some further details).  I would therefore suggest that this "Grand Doctor of Philosophy" "degree" be omitted from this article unless anyone can find more reputable sources, or evidence that a real, accredited university has begun awarding it. -- Nicholas Jackson (talk) 01:19, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  This section I wrote is for discussion section only and I did not place the story on the article at this time. I will keep my eye on any events that can give the evidence and I will put the story on the article upon verification of the evidence. If I doubt about any new evidence, I will add new story here rather than the article. Anyone can put any new evidence here. Danielcg (talk) 07:00, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grand Doctor of Philosophy Degree 

message: This is what I put in.
However, for many programs a master's degree is not required for acceptance into their Ph.D program, nor are they expected to have mastered the material covered for a masters degree. Many programs simply gauge the potential of a student applying to their program and will give them a masters degree upon completion of the necessary Ph.D course work. Once the person has finished Ph.D qualifying exams he/she is considered a Ph.D candidate, and may begin work on his/her dissertation.
It was deleted because, "contradicts previous sentence and is, in itself, not entirely true".  I put it back in, but I would like to know why people don't think this is true.  Most programs that I have personally looked at (MIT, Cornell, Brown, Princeton, Courant, University of Toronto, McGill, Boston University, Northwestern, University of Maryland, Delaware, NJIT, etc) assert this is true.  Furthermore, this is how I will get my PhD in Applied Mathematics.--Aminhungryboy (talk) 17:14, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe this is not true (i.e., mastering the masters-level material *is* necessary to completing the PhD for those who choose to "skip" the masters). It is the case that a PhD student can simply apply for a masters upon completion of the PhD course work. However, the PhD courses are (at least in my experience) beyond the level of the courses required for the masters. For example, at my alma mater, the masters courses were all 400 and 500 level. The PhD courses began at 600 level. One could complete the 600 and 700 level courses, but not the dissertation, and apply for a masters. But, those who did the masters in the traditional manner would never had hit the 600 level courses. Wikiant (talk) 22:57, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah I see.  I am currently an undergrad, and I have/am taking MS/PhD level courses (my department doesn't separate MS and PhD courses).  My advisor was telling me however, that PhD programs in applied math don't require prospective students to take graduate level courses.  Most of the PhD students in my department have never taken graduate courses when they were undergrads.  Perhaps that's only true for some departments.  Also, the only differences between our MS and PhD programs are the number of courses and dissertation.  I have yet to do my PhD so I was just going by what the departments I have spoken to told me.  Also, I noticed that most professors I know never did their MS, just went straight to PhD.  --Aminhungryboy (talk) 02:18, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

text: Your statement may be true for some departments at some universities, but is definitely not true in general. In fact, I know of *no* instances in which a student sitting in a first-year doctoral-level course is not expected to have the background of a masters student. By "expected," I don't mean that the student is expected to be able to pass as masters-level exam on the first day of classes. I do mean that the professors make no allowances for holes in one's knowledge resulting from the lack of a masters degree. Wikiant (talk) 19:04, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Granted my experience is limited to one graduate program, however I also received the same advise with regards to securing funding from the advisor at my undergrad institution.  The specific graduate program I was in loaded up 4 core classes in the first year that were required both for the MS and Ph.D followed by a qualifying examination at the end of the year.  Students who were unable to get the threshold GPA in the core classes and pass the qualifier had to finish up with an MS (after completing the required thesis and technical electives), while those that passed the hurdles skipped the MS thesis and the corresponding degree and after another 3+ years finished their doctoral work if all went to plan.  I think there were only 5 or so other technical courses I took, and most were taken in year 2 and 3.  Admittedly those courses would have been more painful to take in year 1.  And yes, if you take the harder classes early on the professors do not cut you any slack - as you said, you may not know the background material on day one, but you are expected to take the initiative to fill those knowledge gaps on your own time and keep up with the class —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.41.200.149 (talk) 03:37, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there is confusion over what is required for entrance into a graduate program and what is required for acceptance into a PhD program. A student is accepted into a graduate program with a bachelor's degree and would not be expected to have knowledge of master's level material (whatever that might be). At some point during his/her graduate career there would be a determination regarding entering into a doctoral program. Depending on a variety of circumstances (policies of a particular school, academic performance to date, a series of qualifimg tests, etc.) a student might be invited to skip the master's degree, earn the master's before going on for the doctorate, or take a terminal master's degree or maybe even be kicked out of the graduate school. I doubt very much that any graduate school in the US would expect any student entering directly from an undergraduate program to have any knowledge beyond that of any undergraduate degree holder. Wschart (talk) 12:10, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Many programs don't require an MS and MS is given after completing PhD coursework 

message: Information regarding Spain is not completely correct and outdated (new laws in 2005 and 2007).  Needs to be updated. Ripero (talk) 00:01, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If you know more up-to-date information then please edit the article accordingly. -- Nicholas Jackson (talk) 09:31, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info about Spanish doctorate very outdated 

message: "All universities have the right to award doctorates in their assigned fields.[25] Universities of applied sciences (ammattikorkeakoulu) do not award doctoral degrees. "
GeneCallahan (talk) 14:08, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a Finnish peculiarity. Only the 16 universities mentioned in the University Act (558/2009) and the National Defence College are considered yliopisto and called universities in the English language. The ammattikorkeakoulu-type institutions translate their names as "universities of applied science" but they are not considered universities by the Finnish legislation. The Ministry of Education translates the word ammattikorkeakoulu as "polytechnic". So, there are "universities" and "universities of applied science". Only the "universities" have the right to award doctorates. --MPorciusCato (talk) 16:21, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consecutive Sentences Contradict Each Other 

message: There seems to be a strong tendency in the article to identify the medieval doctorate with the Islamic Ijazah to the point that the former was a direct adoption of the later. However, the very same George Makdisi, indeed a notable serious scholar, comes in another article of his to the opposite conclusion. George Makdisi: "Madrasa and University in the Middle Ages", Studia Islamica, No. 32 (1970), pp. 255-264 (260):
Perhaps the most fundamental difference between the two systems is embodied in their systems of certification; namely, in medieval Europe, the licentia docendi, or license to teach; in medieval Islam, the ijaza, or authorization. In Europe, the license to teach was a license to teach a certain field of knowledge. It was conferred by the licensed masters acting as a corporation, with the consent of a Church authority, in Paris, by the Chancellor of the Cathedral Chapter... Certification in the Muslim East remained a personal matter between the master and the student. The master conferred it on an individual for a particular work, or works. Qualification, in the strict sense of the word, was supposed to be a criterion, but it was at the full discretion of the master, since, if he chose, he could give an ijaza to children hardly able to read, or even to unborn children. This was surely an abuse of the system...but no official system was involved. The ijaza was a personal matter, the sole prerogative of the person bestowing it; no one could force him to give one.
For the fundamental difference between the Christian medieval university and the Islamic madrasa, please see also here. I believe this all makes it clear that we are dealing with two different concepts; therefore, I tone down the whole claim. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 00:36, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That was from a much earlier paper by Makdis written in 1970. In a later 1989 paper, Makdisi revised his views based on more recent research. This pretty much makes his earlier outdated view irrelevant. Regards, Jagged 85 (talk) 13:11, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Where does he say that he "revised" his ealier views? I did not find any statements of his to that extent, do you? Gun Powder Ma (talk) 15:31, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medieval doctorate and Islamic [[Ijazah]] 

message: I changed the adjective "terminal professional" to "first professional" (describing the J.D.) in the first paragraph for several reasons. WP has a page describing the J.D. as a "first professional" degree. The citation given for this statement comes from a nursing journal. Also, the journal cited seems not to exist (or rather, I cannot find it via a google search nor via several library databases). Wikiant (talk) 19:30, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminal vs. Professional 

message: There is debate about whether to retain the content in this article in second paragraph of the introduction which reads, "...a distinction is sometimes made between terminal professional degrees (such as the J.D.) and terminal research degrees (such as the LL.D. J.S.D., or S.J.D.)" or whether to change the wording of "terminal professional degrees" to "first professional degrees."  It appears that the main opposition to the content is with associating the J.D. degree with the term "terminal professional degree," however no dispute over facts has been raised in the editing summaries.
The paragraph containing this content addresses terminal degrees, and therefore using the term would be consistent with the topic of the paragraph.  It also maintains the parallel phrasing of the clause.  Replacing "terminal" with "first" would result in content which is awkward and confusing to the reader.  In addition, in my opinion the reasons given thus far for the change (because of another wiki article and a vague dispute with a citation) are insufficient.  It appears that the editor has motives other than the improvement of the article.  Nonetheless, the content of another wiki article is insufficient to justify the awkward change to this content, and the citation provided does in fact discuss the topic of the paragraph in depth.
Therefore, I will remove reference to the J.D. degree, even though the example is helpful to the readers, and retain the content to read, "first professional degrees." Zoticogrillo (talk) 20:11, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  terminal professional degrees and first professional degrees 

message: For some reason, there are a lot of Latin translations given in this article, and I don't see the relevance. I was going to go through and delete them but I thought it would be better to mention it here so that somebody more knowledgeable on the subject can make a more informed decision. 82.33.61.156 (talk) 10:48, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you give some examples?  I only see it twice--once in the lead and at the beginning of "History," in both cases to discuss the origin of the term.  Throughout the text, numerous foreign languages are used, and I think that Latin even shows up a few more times when not explicitly called so (like ex auditorio in the case of Denmark), but I assumed that's because those are the official terms used in that country.  For instance, in the U.S., most doctorate degrees are called "PhD," which stands for the Latin philosophiae doctor.  In other words, in the U.S., the official term is in Latin.  Perhaps that's what you're seeing here.  If there are, however, specific places where the Latin seems odd, please post here--it's possible that extra unnecessary Latin has crept into the article over time.  Qwyrxian (talk) 23:33, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much Latin 

message: In the table on Professional Doctorates in the U.S., this degree is listed with a reference to the Northeastern University site. However, the doctorate that NEU lists for Law and Policy is a Ph.D. [] I think this entry should be removed. --Tim Sabin (talk) 18:26, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doctor of Law and Public Policy (L.P.D.) 

message: There is a lot of uncited assertions made in the research doctorates section. I can't say for certain if they are true or false so I just added fact tags. I know from personal experience no two PhDs at any school are the same so if they aren't cited reasonably soon I personally believe we should just get rid of the uncited facts as per WP:NOCITE. Random2001 (talk) 14:28, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Research Doctorates in the United States 

message: It seems pretty odd that this isn't included anywhere in this article since Canada has many schools that award doctorates and has for a long time. If any other users wish to add information I invite them. Alternatively this article could use a serious overhaul and areas with similar practices could be grouped (e.g. doctorates in Canada are similar in structure to most major American schools so perhaps a North America section would make more sense). --Dhall27 (talk) 04:06, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In the French Wikipedia they did it better, look there, please. --13Peewit (talk) 09:02, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Research Doctorates in Canada 

message: The link to the CONEAU site is broken, probably due to a reorganization of the site. In the recent times, the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology was splitted in two: Ministry of Education on one side (mineduc), and Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (mincyt).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.135.31.242 (talk) 22:45, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Practice by country, Argentina 

message: Another editor has replaced part of the lead of this article with the following text:
It is not a standardized degree, meaning that different Ph.D holders, even in the same discipline do not necessarily have the same knowledge and skills and even though they can be considered experts in their specific fields of research they can not be considered experts in a specific discipline. For example a Ph.D holder in economics may not claim to be an expert in economics but can claim to be an expert in his specific research area in Economics. A Ph.D is not a professional degree and usually professional degrees such as the ACCA, the ACA and the CFA are more respected in their respective professional sectors such as accounting, investment and commercial banking, financial analysis and asset management. Ph. D. holders often need to obtain a professional qualification such as the ACA, ACCA or CFA in order to leave academia and join the industry. The research doctorate, or the Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) and its equivalent titles, are known as junior doctorates and represent the second highest academic qualification after the senior doctorate offered by some universities.
I have reverted the edit because it seems to be dubious and opinionated original research, especially the parts about PhD holders not being experts in their discipline and "often need[ing] to obtain a professional qualification such as the ACA, ACCA or CFA in order to leave academia and join the industry."  The first claim is at best inaccurate and the second claim seems to be quite overwrought.  In any case, both claims need to be supported by reliable sources.  Further, the lead of the article should be a summary of the body so material about these claims should be added to the body of the article first and then we can figure out if they should be added to the lead. ElKevbo (talk) 14:27, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with removal for much the reasons mentioned above. Also focusing on UK based accountancy regulation seems hardly global in outlook. Similarly PhD as junior doctorate should be sourced, and is unlikely to be considered as such around the globe (many countries have no different doctorate levels). Arnoutf (talk) 14:52, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: PhD holders aren't experts in their field?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Doctorate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061031095524/http://gfme.org:80/global_guide/pdf/13-18%20Argentina.pdf to http://www.gfme.org/global_guide/pdf/13-18%20Argentina.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091030082049/http://gsas.harvard.edu:80/publications/history_and_organization.php to http://gsas.harvard.edu/publications/history_and_organization.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:50, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is a hidden note in the article in one section stating: "Note: The following isn't meant to include a comprehensive list, just a few illustrative examples from various countries. Please don't add any more without discussion on the talk page." Stating that editors have to propose edits on the talk page prior to editing is contrary to the Wikipedia-wide consensus set out in the editing guideline WP:Be bold. The guideline states "Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BOLD) can be explained in three words: "Go for it". The Wikipedia community encourages users to be bold when updating the encyclopedia. Wikis like ours develop faster when everybody helps to fix problems, correct grammar, add facts, make sure wording is accurate, etc. We would like everyone to be bold and help make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia. How many times have you read something and thought – Why aren't these pages copy edited? Wikipedia not only allows you to add, revise, and edit articles: it wants you to do it."OnBeyondZebrax • TALK 15:05, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That note is there because more can be worse, rather than better. Creating indiscriminate long list of trivial facts makes the text more difficult to read, while it does not add relevant content. Something that seems to be difficult for many editors to grasp is that editing is at least as much about (boldly) removing texts as it is about adding. In this case the information is available on Wikipedia, as a more comprehensive list and is referred to in the section where these entries are added. Arnoutf (talk) 16:59, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hidden note requiring talk page discussion before changes 

message: The name, usage, topic and scope of Postdoctoral researcher is under discussion, see talk:Postdoctoral researcher -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 05:52, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "Postdoctoral researcher"

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Doctorate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120127015732/http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ous/international/usnei/us/doctorate.doc to http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ous/international/usnei/us/doctorate.doc
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.handbook.uts.edu.au/courses/c02027.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080930110055/http://berkley-u.edu:80/hon_deg.html to https://berkley-u.edu/hon_deg.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100825190643/http://ezra.cornell.edu:80/posting.php?timestamp=1052974800 to http://ezra.cornell.edu/posting.php?timestamp=1052974800#question19
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080612113035/http://www.coneau.edu.ar:80/index.php?item=29&apps=16&id=428&act=ver to http://www.coneau.edu.ar/index.php?item=29&apps=16&id=428&act=ver#
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061031095524/http://www.gfme.org/global_guide/pdf/13-18%20Argentina.pdf to http://www.gfme.org/global_guide/pdf/13-18%20Argentina.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100825184546/http://www.coneau.edu.ar/index.php?item=29&apps=16&id=428&act=ver&idioma=en to http://www.coneau.edu.ar/index.php?item=29&apps=16&id=428&act=ver&idioma=en
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080916080225/http://spuweb.siu.edu.ar:80/studyinargentina/pages/study1103.php to http://spuweb.siu.edu.ar/studyinargentina/pages/study1103.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081206183421/http://www.coneau.edu.ar:80/index.php?item=3&apps=64&idioma=en to http://www.coneau.edu.ar/index.php?item=3&apps=64&idioma=en
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426041947/http://download.sns.it/SNSguida_eng.pdf to http://download.sns.it/SNSguida_eng.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111104111953/http://www.italgiure.giustizia.it/nir/1980/lexs_88887.html to http://www.italgiure.giustizia.it/nir/1980/lexs_88887.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101217152308/http://ib-groep.nl/international_visitors/Diploma_assessment/Coming_to_the_Netherlands/s20_an_academic_title.asp to http://www.ib-groep.nl/international_visitors/Diploma_assessment/Coming_to_the_Netherlands/s20_an_academic_title.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080216045313/http://www.upm.es/laupm/organos_gobierno/normativa/NormativaDoctorado0203.pdf to http://www.upm.es/laupm/organos_gobierno/normativa/NormativaDoctorado0203.pdf
*Added  tag to https://www.micinn.es/teseo/listarBusqueda.do
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120609114041/http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2011/02/10/pdfs/BOE-A-2011-2541.pdf to http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2011/02/10/pdfs/BOE-A-2011-2541.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140727124120/http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2007/10/30/pdfs/A44037-44048.pdf to http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2007/10/30/pdfs/A44037-44048.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100613180335/http://www.owen.vanderbilt.edu/vanderbilt/Programs/phd/phd-admissions/index.cfm to http://www.owen.vanderbilt.edu/vanderbilt/Programs/phd/phd-admissions/index.cfm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120127015732/http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ous/international/usnei/us/doctorate.doc to http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ous/international/usnei/us/doctorate.doc
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:27, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 13 external links on Doctorate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161114124147/http://erhard-weigel-gesellschaft.de.dedi2970.your-server.de/biographie-weigels/ to http://erhard-weigel-gesellschaft.de.dedi2970.your-server.de/biographie-weigels/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161030080003/http://philosophy.cua.edu/faculty/wippel/cv/ to http://philosophy.cua.edu/faculty/wippel/cv/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161213104206/http://www.aqf.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/aqf-qualification-titles-pdf-2b3-1b.pdf to http://www.aqf.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/AQF-qualification-titles-PDF-2B3-1b.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://courses.handbooks.uwa.edu.au/courses/c2/2081
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://berkley-u.edu/hon_deg.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://ezra.cornell.edu/posting.php?timestamp%3D1052974800
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.coneau.edu.ar/index.php?item%3D29%26apps%3D16%26id%3D428%26act%3Dver
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://spuweb.siu.edu.ar/studyinargentina/pages/study1103.php
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.coneau.edu.ar/index.php?item%3D3%26apps%3D64%26idioma%3Den
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.kmk.org/wissenschaft-hochschule/internationale-hochschulangelegenheiten/fuehrung-auslaendischer-hochschulgrade.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090910032346/http://www.iblaw.ynu.ac.jp/english/law/program_i.html to http://www.iblaw.ynu.ac.jp/english/law/program_i.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.yale.edu/opa/newsr/97-04-21-01.all.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111104111953/http://www.italgiure.giustizia.it/nir/1980/lexs_88887.html to http://www.italgiure.giustizia.it/nir/1980/lexs_88887.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:06, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Doctorate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/663YfpV8X?url=http://www.sns.it/scuola/istituzionale/regolamentointerno/download/statuto_sns.pdf to http://www.sns.it/scuola/istituzionale/regolamentointerno/download/statuto_sns.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090225221743/http://www.mgmt.purdue.edu/programs/phd/admissions/ to http://www.mgmt.purdue.edu/programs/phd/admissions/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:13, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified