Talk:Holmfirth

message: I shall revert edits by 213.177.254.57 to the last version by Adambro regarding the use of apostrophe in Lodge's. The supermarket in Holmfirth along with a number of others in the Huddersfield area were owned (prior to the Co-op acquisition) by F. & A. E. Lodge. Consequently, stores of the Lodge family were Lodge's.
--R.carroll 21:19, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lodge's/Lodges 

message: I note that the category 'Town and village of the Peak District' has been removed, with the editor stating that Holmfirth doesn't lie within the boundary. While I'm aware it's a few miles outside the Peak Park boundary, Holmfirth seems to be generally considered to be within, or at least on the edge of, the Peak District -- see the Peak District talk page. I'm not aware of any formal boundary, other than the Park one, for the district? Espresso Addict 21:28, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As no-one responded, I've restored this category, according to the policy developed at the Peak District page. Please see the Peak District talk page for more details, or to enter the debate about categorising places in the Peak. Thanks. Espresso Addict 12:38, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Peak District boundary

message: Isn't the description of the River Holme a bit misleading as the river actually rises from Holme Moss?Tyke abroad (talk) 10:00, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see a description of the river on this article, just a link to the the river's article page River Holme. Any discussion on that pages description of the river should take place on that articles talk page not this one. Though I don't really see a problem with the description that has been provided there, which is accurate! :0) Richard Harvey (talk) 17:42, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I just don't see the relevance of Holme Styes here - both these rivers are fed from a variety of sources (Brownhill, Yateholme, Digley, etc.). Plus this description makes it sound like Holme Styes is the head water for both rivers - something it clearly is not.Tyke abroad (talk) 10:16, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see what you mean! However the problem is now resolved as I've deleted the information from the article lead.  It was not only incorrect, but also irrelevant to the article. Richard Harvey (talk) 18:21, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: River Holme

message: No mention that the show was filmed in Holmfirth? I'm surprised! TR (talk) 11:56, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps you missed the first paragraph of the section titled 'Description'. Holmfirth was the setting for the TV series, however the majority of filming encompassed a very wide and diverse area, not all of which is within the area around Holmfirth, such as Jackson Bridge, Hepworth, Meltham and Marsden. Richard Harvey (talk) 13:38, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last of the Summer Wine 

message: Can anyone find a population for Holmfirth, besides the current one that inlcudes the whole ward.  I would have estimated the population of the town alone would have been around 6,000- 7,000.  Mtaylor848 (talk) 19:44, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If you just mean the 'Settlement' area of Holmfirth and not those in the adjoining ones, such as Underbank & Cinderhills, Burnlee, Cartworth Moor, Upperthong, Wooldale, Thongsbridge, etc then you are looking at a current figure around 1,980 - 2,000. Richard Harvey (talk) 08:55, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population 

message: Richard Harvey zaps my link to Holmfirth Festival of Folk as spam. I see above that this has happened before. 
I don't have the time (or to be honest the interest) to read up chapter and verse about this, or the slightest inclination to get into an edit war over something so trivial, but someone seems to be getting a bit carried away with wiki-dogma here. Surely the concept of spamlinking concerns cynical attempts to use Wikipedia to boost the rankings of or visitors to a website for commercial ends. A link to a community folk festival which is part of the culture of Holmfirth and one reason someone might have heard of the place is clearly not that. With no disrespect to cricketers I think it probably has more light to shed than the website of the Thongsbridge Cricket Club Junior Section.
If no linked site can contain any links to any commercial sites, then a truly vast number of useful external links on WP will have to be deleted. It will be impossible to link from the page about a festival to its official website, which frankly would be ridiculous.
Best wishes, Flapdragon (talk) 21:53, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand your meaning and concerns. However as you noted above the link has been removed before See this question and reply from the Spam talk page concerning that specific link:- External_link_to_community_event. Have you considered creating an article about the folk festival, to which you could add the link? Richard Harvey (talk) 08:20, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holmfirth Festival alleged "spamlink" again 

message: Hi Folks, sorry for the lack of Wikipedia experience, would it be possible for someone to add details re the Food and Drink festival?  website is http://holmfirthfoodanddrink.org.  We had 40,000 people in Holmfirth for the 10th anniversary in 2015 - http://www.examiner.co.uk/news/west-yorkshire-news/thousands-come-out-celebrate-10th-10140810  Please let me know if you need any more info/sources.  Thanks for your expert help!  Jamie Jimmy2bob (talk) 22:34, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That website link is simply a promotional / advertising page for the 2016 event. That type of external link is not allowed and would be deleted by any editor.  Richard Harvey (talk) 00:01, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Holmfirth Food and Drink Festival

message: Substituted at 18:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment