Talk:Arlington, Washington

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Arlington, Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/64vfLAeJ2?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fgeo%2Fwww%2Fgazetteer%2Ffiles%2FGaz_places_national.txt to http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:22, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: You say this is image-heavy, but I think rather the contrary. Compare Seattle, or even Grand Forks, North Dakota, also featured articles. - Jmabel | Talk 15:59, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Seattle and Grand Forks have layout problems caused by squeezing too many images into tight spaces and thereby creating text sandwiches. Please see MOS:IM for the relevant guidelines. Finetooth (talk) 21:19, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

text: As Finetooth says, there's some layout issues, but I also think a small gallery of NRHP buildings isn't necessary when the section already links to their respective articles. The only images I think this article need are from outlying suburban neighborhoods (which I plan to drive around and get) that better reflect the character of the city. SounderBruce 01:17, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image-heavy? 

message: This is not up for discussion for this single article, as it's a Wikipedia-wide standard. We can move the discussion to the US places project, but I doubt anyone wants to rewrite their bot just to delete it, so upon no complaints, I'll change it back again. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 01:21, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The standard only exists for articles that have not undergone a more rigorous peer review, like the FA process, which this article has. Thus it should not be subject to the same "standard" (which is not documented anywhere) and should defer instead to the very fresh review. Please stop edit warring over this, it's pointless. SounderBruce 01:25, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Standard for US Places is to Have Estimates in Historical Populations Tables 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Arlington, Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170423022715/http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/narratives/washington/ to http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/narratives/washington/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:52, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Arlington, Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170416130335/http://www.pnwlocalnews.com/news/340029621.html to http://www.pnwlocalnews.com/news/340029621.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:44, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: According to the article,
Any idea why it would be named for a 17th-century English personage than, say, for another American Arlington such as Arlington, Massachusetts, or Arlington, Virginia, as are most other American Arlingtons?  —  AjaxSmack  16:51, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a conflicting account that claims this Arlington was named for the Arlington House, but it's not from a reliable source like Meany's article. Considering that the name was decided by the railroad and its executives, anything goes. SounderBruce 23:57, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of "Arlington"? 

message: 1. The Sauk had no camp at Arlington, no source I can find mentioned this. The territory of the Sauk-Suiattle was on the Sauk and Suiattle rivers, out past Darrington. The Sauk and many other tribes would likely visit the village during migratory seasons, but there were no other permanent settlements of other tribes. 
2. The prairies was a gathering ground, not a settlement, according to the Stillaguamish About Us page. 
3. The village was at Skabalko, according to every source. Stiqiyu is what the area around Arlington was called, according to Tracy Boser, who is the Stillaguamish Cultural Resource Specialist. This is from this Herald Article. 
PersusjCP (talk) 22:22, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, I think the Trafton sentence should be removed since it isn't relevant to Arlington. That information should just be added to the page for Trafton. PersusjCP (talk) 22:27, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some notes on Precontact Habitation