lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:National League (English football)

message: has it been decided that Conf North and Conf South teams won't have their grounds added to the Football Conference template? or is it still to be done and nobody has got around to it yet? DJhinckley (talk) 13:11, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I did initially add them, but it makes the template look quite messy (as many are not linked as grounds that have not hosted national level football don't qualify for articles). I assume you want De Montford Park added, but really the article should be merged into the club one for the aforementioned reason. Number 57 13:18, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  it was just that there were templates for Conf South and Conf North grounds and then they were gone? I've obviously missed the discussion on the Templates Discussion page about what was happening to these templates and just wondered what was going on? DJhinckley (talk) 13:26, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  And as an afterthought, I've just checked the Main project and Notability criteria pages and there is nothing mentioned about notability for grounds that haven't hosted national level football? Criteria for Clubs is "All teams that have played in the national cup are assumed to meet WP:N criteria" so would have to assume that criteria also applies to grounds of those clubs? If there is other Notability Criteria specifically for grounds elsewhere, could someone point it out please. DJhinckley (talk) 13:54, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been discussed on WT:FOOTY a few times. The rationale was along the lines of if the players aren't notable at that level, neither are the stadiums (which really means that Conference National grounds shouldn't qualify either). The vast majority of non-qualifying ground articles have been merged already, but there are one or two that still need to be done (and now I'm reminded I'll probably try and do them next week). Number 57 15:01, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fair enough if it been discussed and decided that is the notability criteria for grounds. As long as that is applied fairly and all grounds that don't meet the criteria are merged with their main articles, ie Cressing Road, Gateshead International Stadium, Highbury Stadium, Kingfield, Lamb Ground, New Bucks Head,  New Lawn, Newport Stadium, North Street and Rockingham Road. DJhinckley (talk) 19:54, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Those ones all qualify as they have hosted national-level football (Conference National grounds do qualify despite the comment above). Number 57 21:03, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conf North & South grounds 

message: FYI.  Proact Stadium will become Technique Stadium when the contract expires at the end of July 2020. WP:RS:
:* 
--David Tornheim (talk) 01:15, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proact Stadium renamed to Technique Stadium
Talk:Eleventeen (EP)

message: On 1 Sep 2006, an anonymous IP (with no other edits) replaced the number 21 with 111. I changed it back.
The word "eleventeen" is a childish or whimsical way to say 21, or a reference to extended adolescence (still being a teenager despite being of major age). The overgeneralization from thirteen, fourteen, etc. isn't one that young children often make, but it's a common joke that slightly older children make, and it is sometimes used in "cute kid" dialog written by adults.
I'd bet that the band later known as Eve 6 intended the extended adolescence reading. At least one other band with the same name has a theme song with the words "nineteen, tenteen, eleventeen" and "don't tell me to grow up." Daisy Chainsaw's eleventeen-year-old singer KatieJane also used it the same way on the album Eleventeen.
I can imagine someone (a non-native speaker?) thinking that the pattern is that thirteen is a three prefixed by a one, etc., so eleventeen is 111. But children don't actually use it that way (or any similar patterns based on orthography), and the etymology of "teen" is obviously (even to small children) related to 10, not prefixed-with-a-one. --76.203.75.30 01:24, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  111/21 

message: In [], reference to the first Daisy Chainsaw album was removed from this page (along with a bunch of cruft). 
I think the most famous release by Daisy Chainsaw is far more notable than the least famous release by Eve 6. 
Also, the Daisy Chainsaw page actually links here. --76.203.75.30 01:27, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no Daisy Chainsaw?
Talk:Elio samaga hukapan kariyana turu

message: Please remove this entry from Wikipedia.
The title of this article is composed of obscene words from Sinahala language of Sri Lanka. Whoever cretaed this did it for fun and not any serious purpose.
Please remove.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.143.25.2 (talk) 08:40, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is an invalid entry
Talk:Elvis' Golden Records Volume 3

message: As a gift  i recieved  a elvis presley record date sometime between  1965 to 1969 while in taipei taiwan. In moving my household i found the album again. gut cannot find any referench to it. the record itself is a 33 in size but the color is orange. With japense or chinse writing it. It is called The Gold Hits / Elvis Presley the song are as ,  No More, Girl Happy , G.I. Blues, Wooden Heaart, Hound Dog,  Wear my ring around your neck,  Do'nt be cruel, Love Me tender, It's now or never, Little sister  , Good Luck Charm, Summer kisses Winter, Tears, King Creole, Moonlight Swim, Are you lomesome tonight? Cryining in the  chapel. I ccan't find referench to it anywhere? Any info   would be helpful. Cathlenne
:it probably is a bootleg album. Probably not released by RCA 67.174.19.64 (talk) 17:28, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  the golden hits / elvis presley 
Template talk:Essex Senior League

message: I undid the edit by 86.168.27.211 as it was incorrect. Romford will play in the Isthmian League Division One North for 2009-10, while it appears (although I cannot find confirmation yet) that Witham Town will play in the Essex Senior League. Awaiting definite news of ESL's constitution for next season before updating this template with the correct information. Mattwhiteski (talk) 17:09, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 2009-10 team list
Talk:Elvis for Everyone!

message: The original UK LP release had Wild in the Country instead of Summer Kisses, Winter Tears, but otherwise the same running order.  The cover had a full-length portrait of Elvis with a Gibson acoustic guitar from the set of Tickle Me.  Could someone more skilled in wiki matters add at least the first point?  Thanks. Bhasi23 (talk) 19:36, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

message: In form and intent, this LP is no different than Elvis Sings Flaming Star and Almost in Love, two albums also made of previously unreleased tracks (some dating back years) which are categorized as compilation albums. This record should be too if that's the case, especially given this example includes some tracks dating back a decade. 70.73.90.119 (talk) 15:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Should be classified a compilation album
Talk:Elvis Sings The Wonderful World of Christmas

message: Since "sings" is a verb, shouldn't it be written in capital letter? Johnnyboytoy (talk) 22:39, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, per MOS:TITLECAPS – I'm going to get it changed now. Richard3120 (talk) 15:44, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Emeis

message: This article is one in a series that has been subjected to disruptive editing for several months. Accordingly, it has been semi-protected for a like term. Logged in contributors who have been autoconfirmed are still able to edit the article. If you are not registered or autoconfirmed, you can still request that an edit be made to this article at this talk page. If the talk page is not active, you can place  (brackets and all) next to your suggestion, and another editor will soon review your request. See Wikipedia:Protection policy for more information. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:31, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article protected
Talk:Baban

message: *"Emirate of Baban" -Llc 5
*"Baban Emirate" -Llc 17
*"Baban Principality" -Llc 29 (minimum) 15
*"Principality of Baban" -Llc 8
--Takabeg (talk) 02:00, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Empty Sky

message: On the original UK vinyl the song is titled "Hay Chewed" (no hyphen), not "Hay-Chewed". 217.155.20.163 14:21, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hay Chewed 

message: Until 1975, UK and European imports of the LP, as well as bootlegs like Gulliver's Gone, filled the void.  MCA's Congress label and/or Bell Records were gonna put it out, but attention went to the self-titled album instead.Sposato (talk) 04:46, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  US availability 

message: The article currently states that the "definitive" version of Skyline Pigeon is the one recorded along with the  Don't Shoot Me I'm Only the Piano Player album. That is a matter of opinion. It's one I do not agree with. In any case , it should be removed from the article. Crawdad63 (talk) 19:09, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skyline Pigeon
Talk:Clarendon Vale, Tasmania

message: : 
: {Citation | author1=Collins, Julie | author2=Plibersek, Tanya | author3=Australian Labor Party | title=Homebuyers at Clarendon Vale to save under housing affordability | publication-date=2009-09-02 | url=https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/193060261 | accessdate=14 February 2018 }}
Also lots more if checked  JarrahTree 11:55, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  potentially usable refs
Talk:Envy (Eve's Plum album)

message: WTF is with the mean-spirited tone of this article?
24.147.94.78 (talk)Sean  —Preceding undated comment added 17:04, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mean-spirited
Talk:Episodes of a Hustla

message: the stretch armstrong link is wrng. it should be DJ stretch armstrong.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.141.85.245 (talk) 10:28, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  stretch armstrong
Talk:Epinonimous

message: It would appear that the actual title of the album is Epinonimous not Eponimous.  I would assume that the creator of the article used Eponimous as that was the title of the album referred to on the group's (Downsyde) webpage.  However as correctly pointed out by Meowy the cover of the album clearly states the album name as Epinonimous, I have checked and all sites, including Australia Music Online, refer to the album as Epinonimous. Dan arndt 00:26, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested Move
Talk:The Essential Toni Braxton

message: The article states that the track listings for the US and the Brazilian edition are the same, still, the "track listing" section includes two different ones.
Also, "The Little Things" is not a previously unreleased song. It was used as a bonus track on Ultimate Toni Braxton, along with Whatchu Need. – Alensha talk 16:17, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Brazil
Talk:Estrus (EP)

message: Is the exact date of release known? Gershake (talk) 14:47, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date
Talk:Yoshitsune Senbon Zakura

message: I'm not sure on the standards or guidelines as to plot summaries, but I am trying to summarize the narrative as cleanly and briefly as possible, while not omitting any particularly significant points. Though at this rate it's looking like this will be a considerably longer plot summary than, say, Romeo and Juliet, it is also a much longer play (~250 pages in Jones' translation). I hope this is alright. ... I hope to finish the summaries over the weekend, or by the end of next week at the latest. In the meantime, please recognize that this is a work in progress, and don't mess with it too much until I've done my bit? LordAmeth 13:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I've finished my summary. I apologize for leaving this sort of message, but in any case I am done now, and if anyone would like to come in and clean up my work, you are more than welcome to. I recognize that the plot summary has ended up quite long, but I do believe it covers all major, important, elements of the plot. Still, perhaps it could be shortened simply by word choice and sentence structure and like that. Thanks. LordAmeth 23:45, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Progress
Talk:Everybody Digs Bill Evans

message: At the end of this page there is a full Bill Evans discography with links.  This appears also in a "Bill Evans Template".  Is this correct---should every album page end with a full discography?  This is not the case, for example, for at least some albums by the Rolling Stones (checked Exile on Main St.) or The Who.  Some jazz artists seem to have it (John Coltrane), some don't (Louis Armstrong).  I think it's useful to have.  Should there be a uniform practice here, so that the goal should be to add it to (a template for?) posts on albums by all jazz, rock, pop, country, blues, R&B etc... musicians?
MorphismOfDoom (talk) 22:24, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this and every Bill Evans album page really contain a full discography? 
Talk:Everything I Am (album)

message: This article is one in a series that has been subjected to disruptive editing for several months. Accordingly, it has been semi-protected for a like term. Logged in contributors who have been autoconfirmed are still able to edit the article. If you are not registered or autoconfirmed, you can still request that an edit be made to this article at this talk page. If the talk page is not active, you can place  (brackets and all) next to your suggestion, and another editor will soon review your request. See Wikipedia:Protection policy for more information. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:35, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article protected
Talk:86open

message: It ran from 1997 til when?  It sounds like a special interest group that ran for a year, but the article makes it sound more like a consortium which was supposed to last forever. Gronky 10:18, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did it end? 

message: In response to the notability tag added today I've added several references. These include a Linux Today article, an announcement of 86open by Bruce Perens on the Debian announce mailing list, the declaration of Ulrich Drepper in the  SCO vs IBM lawsuit, and a discussion of 86open and  ELF on Groklaw.
Is 86open notable ? Ronald Joe Record (talk) 03:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I have removed the WikiProject tag, as this article is either a redirect or deleted. If you oppose, please restore the tag. Thank you, fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 16:16, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Computing
Talk:Goguryeo revival movements

message: ...is it or is it not a hoax? If not, the tag should be removed. 68.39.174.238 20:07, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To me it reads more like a plot summary of a piece of historical fiction (comic or film) than like a real piece of history - but that's a stylistic problem for the encyclopedia. It's not a comment on the factual content, because I don't know anything about the historical attempts to restore Goguryeo. --Paularblaster (talk) 15:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Having said all the above...
Talk:Everything Under the Sun (box set)

message: The song "One Cup of Coffee" was a cover of Claude Gray's country song when Bob Marley covered it. So it is a cover of a cover song. I'm not sure it matters to express this idea. 
It is currently written in the  Track listing as:
[Disc 1]
17. "One Cup of Coffee / Judge Not" (Studio) (Bob Marley covers)
It is apparent that this is a cover of Bob Marley's two songs: One Cup of Coffee (cover) and Judge Not, combined into one song; which may explain the pluralization of the word "cover" in parenthesis Wcichello (talk) 20:12, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: One Cup of Coffee
Talk:Experiments in Expectation

message: AbsolutePunk defaults to chorusfm page...leaving ref there, in case anyone else can find it... Caro7200 (talk) 18:50, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  AbsolutePunk
Talk:F.U. Don't Take It Personal

message: A few improvements:
#Try to expand the lead section.
#Consider swapping  for a table (wikitable) as the spacing will probably be better in terms of displaying the content.
#Per WP:record charts sources should be provided alongside each chart and also Heatseakerz can only be used when a song/album fails to chart on main chart.
#The singles would be better presented in a paragraph(s) of prose. 
regards Lil-unique1 (talk) 01:56, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements 
Talk:Fable (album)

message: This discussion has been merged into Talk:No_Regrets_(Faye_Wong_album)#Requested_multi-page_move
:Fable (album) →  – There is Yuyan, a person. Anyway, 'yuyan' (寓言) is translated into Fable or Legend by various sources. However, amount of reliable sources are very scarce, and the following sources were published 10 years after first release of this album: China Post, CRI, China Daily, and Reuters. I assume that they must have used Wikipedia or a fansite as a translator. I must not conclude either English title as commonly used in terms of reliable sources. We could rely on MOS:ALBUM, WP:TITLE, WP:PINYIN, or any other guideline or policy. George Ho (talk) 07:22, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Other versions[edit source]
A "Deluxe" version included a VCD with footage of Faye Wong's commercial for Head & Shoulders shampoo.[7]
Why isn't it called  "Deluxe Edition"? https://www.discogs.com/label/303371-Deluxe-Edition  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tunguschan (talk • contribs) 14:44, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken English
Wikipedia talk:Main Page/In two days

message: Exactly how far ahead does the whole "time traveling to tommorow's/day after tommorow's front page thing" go? 'WiiWillieWiki→(Talk) 13:59, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dunno. I had Main Page/Tomorrow bookmarked as my home page, but this is something else again. I don't think I could handle the wrenching time discontinuity this page causes! :-) Carcharoth 11:27, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Mandatory Iraq

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:LocationIraq.svg is wrong, considering its a 2007 map for a country 70 years before that--Jakezing (talk) 01:44, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  the map 

message: This article is not a "subarticle" of Kingdom of Iraq, the proposal was only for minor change of the article's title, not its scope. If somebody (Srnec) would like to change its scope to become "subarticle of Kingdom of Iraq". Let's make another vote here, else the status quo remains.Greyshark09 (talk) 20:15, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It is subarticle. The British period is part of the monarchical period. It's a subarticle by default: it covers a period that is a subperiod of the other article's period. Srnec (talk) 00:35, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Period
Talk:John Beal (composer)

message: Please help.  I just verified that on this section of Composer John Beal, 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Beal_(composer)#Military_awards_and_decorations
his Air Medal (the first medal on the top row) should be ONE Bronze star in the center and next to it on the right should be the NUMERAL 8.  I cannot find anything in the help sections or talk pages that show how to do this. 
Here is an image of all his medals. The blue and orange is the Air Medal.  https://scontent.fsnc1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/v/t1.0-9/167647_1380473050730_5037307_n.jpg?oh=6eed0a0a81977fa4e65ce28a9f104292&oe=57867E3E
Thank you for your assistance!
WikiBob47 (talk) 20:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately we currently cannot reproduce that kind of device. The full list of available devices can be found at Template:Ribbon devices/device. We can change the gold star to a bronze star, but the highest numeral available is "4". If those devices are the same worn on a ribbon as with the full medal, you could create a "8" image; other than that I'd suggest using the "one silver star counts as five" proxy method even though it's not fully accurate. You may want to ask the people at WT:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals for help; they may be more knowledgeable with such issues. Huon (talk) 21:06, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Favourite Worst Nightmare

message: Can anyone confirm that the album was actually leaked today (March 24, 2007)? Especially the part about it being downloaded 36 times, where was that information found? A citation would be helpful. Omer Zach 01:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever happened or not, does this information really need to be included into the article unsourced? --SoWhy Talk 13:03, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

text: That's what I was saying. Unfortunately some IP-users re-add it everytime. Such informations are in other album's articles as well tho, I don't think them that un-encyclopedic. It just needs a source like a statement from band or record company adressing the leak. --SoWhy Talk 16:16, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Has the album been released early because of the leak, I bought it yesterday (21st April) in Ireland.--Play Brian Moore 23:15, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Leaked

message: I removed it because it isn't the case on the Australian store, and thus may not be true of the others. If it is true, could whoever puts it back in mention which store they are referring to? Iorek85 10:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: iTunes criticism
Talk:Feelin' Kinda Patton

message: I'm sure the album cover is a parody of an another album...but for the life of me, I can't hook them together. Am I delusional? awkwardboyhero 05:36, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There has to be some explanation for this. The tracklist is confirmed by a few sources, but it definitely feels off. The track "Stella D'Oro/Robert Evans/The Sadness Ends" end with him thanking the audience and the emcee saying "Patton Oswalt, ladies and gentlemen!" to end the show. Then it resumes out of nowhere with "Piss Drinkers", and ends abrupty after "Easter Eggs". Unless he came back an encore, and even then, it's a pretty anti-climactic end Aoystreck (talk) 00:43, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Fifty Million People Can't Be Wrong

message: Perhaps this article should mention (once research establishes it) that this title was based on a previous one — either the Elvis album or the Cole Porter musical (or...?). - dcljr (talk) 01:14, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fifty MIllion 
Talk:La Superba

message: Y CVn (La Superbathis) is too faint to call a red supergiant.
The luminosity of Y CVn is 4,400 times solar. Meanwhile that of Mira is 8,400 times solar.
Y CVn is less luminous than Mira. Mira is a M7III type normal red giant.
Therefore , Y CVn should be a normal red giant.
The classification "I" in the spectral type "C7I" of Y CVn  means "Most luminous class of carbon stars". But this class is too faint to call red supergaint's class.
Reference information : List of M type giant stars.
1 Most luminous supergiant(hypergiant)
* VY Canis Majoris The luminosity is 400,000-500,000 times solar and the mass is 30-40 times solar.
 
2 Luminous supergiant(Ia type).
* Mu Cephei: The luminosity is 250,000-350,000 times solar and the mass is 25 times solar.
 
3 Faint supergiants(Ib type).
* Antares: The Luminosity is 65,000 times solar and the mass is 15 times solar .
* betelgeuse: The luminosity is 63,000 times solar and the mass is 14 times solar.
4 Bright giant(II type).
* Alpha Herculis: The luminosity is 20,000 times solar and the mass is 7-10 times solar.
5 Normal giant(III type).
* Mira: The luminosity is 8,400 times solar luminosity and the initial mass is about 2 times solar.
Kometsuga 14:12, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification 