lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Borg-Warner T-56 transmission

message: To the unnamed user who keeps editing the first year for the T-56 in the Corvette to 1992, instead of 1997:  The T-56 was not installed in the Corvette in any factory configuration until 1997, when it was set up as a transaxle in the 1997 Corvette.  It continues to be used in the C6 Corvette and Corvette Z06 today, in the same configuration.  Prior to 1989, the C4 Corvette did not have a proper six-speed; it had a '4+3', which was basically a four-speed with an external overdrive unit.  In 1989, the C4 received the ZF six-speed transmission - the T-56 was not even available yet, and the ZF / C4 were designed around each other.  It would not have made sense for GM to switch transmissions for no real reason in 1992, when the T-56 became available.  This can be confirmed here and many other locations - for example, run a search on Car-Part.com for any Corvette between 1989 and 1996, for a transmission, and select the M.T. option - any case where the junkyard lists details, it will often indicate 'ZF'.  Please do not edit the page again unless you can find some verifiable proof that the C4 Corvette was ever shipped with a T-56 instead of a ZF 6-speed. Ayocee 16:38, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  T-56 vs ZF in C4 Corvette 

message: I just did a quick overview of things and it looks like out of the T-56's few remaining applications (more a matter of model death than anything else), most have switched to the TR-6060.  Is the T-56 still being produced for use in any new vehicles after the end of the 2007 model year? Ayocee 01:04, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It does look like the the T-56 is being gradually phased out. However, there will still probably be a few vehicles using it after the end of 2007. The Holden Commodore will continue using it into 2008 as far as I'm aware. Since its Pontiac G8 cousin will debut with the TR-6060, Holden may switch over as well eventually but unlikely before late 2008. Likewise, the Ford Falcon continues to use it but there's been no confirmation what the next generation model will use. Also, low volume manufacturer Elfin uses it on the Elfin MS8 Streamliner/Clubman. Since they still persevere with the LS1 V8, the T56 might stay around until the end of time. It might be a good idea to ask your question again next year ;) VectorD 06:22, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any current applications? 

message: I've got nothing hard on hand at the moment but I know I've heard that when they moved from BW to Tremec that some minor changes were made - namely synchromesh materials and a few other minor changes.  Do we have any verifiable sources that can confirm or deny this? Ayocee (talk) 17:40, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "No internal changes" when moved from BW to Tremec
Talk:Chloroquine

message: This article (albiet not as badly as Hydroxychloroquine) has been taken over by covid. Given the jury has come back and recommends against its use, it only merits a few sentences in this article, but obviously a lot of work went into this and I hate to just delete it. 
As a result I'd like to fork some content into a new article for historical interest -> Draft:Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19. If you see stuff being deleted, don't worry, that's where it's going. Mvolz (talk) 17:32, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help! This article has been taken over by covid!
Talk:The Squaw Man

message: IMDb, to the best of my knowledge, incorrectly lists this film as a 1914 title.  Is anyone intimiately familiar with IMDb enough to have this corrected?  Nearly every single source of information about this film available indicates that it was in fact released in 1913.  —RaD Man (talk) 08:11, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd always heard 1913 too, Radman, but all the online sources I checked say 1914... There is a mention of it being shown in December 1913, but not released till later. Maybe we heard wrong... --Rizzleboffin 04:07, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong year on IMDb 

message: I just uploaded a Sqaw Man image, which I thought was to the 1914 film: 
"Image:Squaw Man 1914.jpg" However, as I started editing the article, I found out it was to the 1906 stage production. Can anyone tell me how to rename the image to "Sqaw Man 1906.jpg"? --Rizzleboffin 04:10, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've put the image, with the appropriate caption, in the infobox - until the correct image replaces it.SkierRMH 02:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help!
Talk:Molecular machine

message: Disclaimer: Evaluation for writing course.
The content of this article is organized and understandable but is not completely comprehensive. The article gives more of a general overview of the topic. The quality of the evidence is good. The Nobel prize in chemistry is just tacked on at the end of the introduction but not given much detail. Integrating this into the article would be good. References overall are good and most statements are referenced. Article is not based on assumptions. The article has a specific introduction that is okay to comprehend but may not be good for general public reading. Introduction summarizes content of article well. There are a few headings/subheadings but not very many. Images are a bit lacking and could use some work. A lot of detail is also missing in the research section (which is harder to keep up with). The experimental side of the research is not stated at all. The single image is in an appropriate place but not general enough to cover entire article. The coverage of this topic is neutral and the facts are emphasized. Sources are all reliable because they are primary literature of studies with molecular machines.Rztumbleson (talk) 20:29, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The articles Molecular machine and Molecular machinery are on the same topic, and I think the two approaches would actually compliment each other well in a single article.  Antony-22 (talk) 06:51, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Within the Nobel project we work on a script for an explainer video about the molecular machines. The video can be then embedded into the article. You're welcome to review the script and give us feedback. You can find the document here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Simpleshow#Chemistry_-_2016-10-27
Thank you for your support! --Norma.jean (talk) 10:31, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nobel project: Chemistry - explainer video 

message: Molecular machines research is currently at the forefront with the 2016 Nobel Prize in Chemistry being awarded to Jean-Pierre Sauvage, Sir J. Fraser Stoddart and Bernard L. Feringa for the design and synthesis of molecular machines.
At the forefront of what, precisely? 
To my eye this tag-along with is a circumlocution. — MaxEnt 21:24, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circumlocution
Talk:Economy of French Guiana

message: fr:Système électrique de la Guyane contains information (sourced but in French) that should be incorporated onto this article. Both the article and the current and more recent CIA entry are out of date. Andrewa (talk) 13:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: More up to date info
Talk:Argumentum ad lazarum

message: Is it correct to use this phrase for the (very common) converse, arguing that an opponent is wrong because it is rich? Securiger 09:16, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it it's called argumentum ad crumenam. 72.139.119.165 17:32, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 23:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-01-31 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: It seems to me that the second through fourth examples are poor ones.
"The homeless tell us it’s hard to find housing. Thus it must be."
This is a poor basis for asserting a certainty, but it seems that its argument could be called an "Argument from Experience" (if such exists). Even as such it is flawed, as the homeless are not the only group with experience, but it does not seem to be crediting them with authority due to poverty - only due to experience.
"The monks have forsworn all material possessions. They must have achieved enlightenment."
In a Buddhist definition, enlightenment involves detachment from worldly desires. (Also, again the observation does not lead to certainty.) Within a Buddhist paradigm it seems that it is simply attributing an observation to a state which contains a defining element that seems to possibly have causal relationship to the thing observed.
"All you need to know about the civil war in that country is that the rebels live in mud huts, while the general who sends troops against them sits in a luxurious, air-conditioned office."
Is this Argumentum ad Lazarum, or is it Argumentum ad Crumenam? It seems to advise no further examination, which is perhaps unreasonable in itself, but it could spin either way.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Druthulhu (talk • contribs) 21:38, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  examples
Category talk:Grammar frameworks

message: I was wondering how broad we want this category to be. X-bar theory and Tree-adjoining grammar are not really grammar frameworks in the usual sense of the phrase, but I suppose it doesn't do much harm to have them in this category. What do people think? Cadr 09:25, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I didn't know there was a common definition in use...I just made up the title as a place to throw all the theories of grammar floating around Category:Grammar.  The theories of grammar which make up the majority of the entries here fall into various classes...it might be a good idea to collect articles on those classes in their own category, which I take it would include TAGs.  Alternatively, we could make the category tree divide grammar theories into appropriate subclasses, but I think there may be mroe than one way to classify each one, so that sounds like it might be too confusing.  Ithink it's fine for this category to remain "Articles about grammar frameworks and about things related to grammar frameworks", whether just for now or in the long run. -- Beland 00:57, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Women for Israel's Tomorrow

message: Is there a way to have that phrase disambiguate to this page? I had no idea what the "actual name" of the group was/is, so I typed in "women in green", and Wikipedia said there was no such page.FlaviaR 15:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Women in Green" 

message: Is the State of Israel infobox really necessary in this article? -- Nudve (talk) 13:44, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Israel template 

message: This book might go some way towards correcting the poor sourcing of this article. Zerotalk 08:15, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Much of the article is pure promotion.  Unattributed text like "unified in their love for, dedication and faithfulness to the Land of Israel" doesn't belong on Wikipedia. Zerotalk 12:04, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advert tag 
Talk:Polygonia c-album

message: Seems a little ambiguous...I presume it means in 1920 there were only two sightings?
:I've gone ahead and removed this meaningless statement, seeing as it's been on this page for eight years and noöne's figured out what it means.  — TORTOISEWRATH 03:37, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "and by 1920 there were only two sightings"

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Polygonia c-album qtl2.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on January 22, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-01-22. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! —howcheng  {chat} 23:28, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Polygonia c-album qtl2.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: "The form that overwinters before reproducing" and "The form that develops directly to sexual maturity".  This really does not make sense.  I suppose that developing "directly to sexual maturity" does not mean that the butterfly adult hatches from the egg without a larval stage, but rather that this form lays eggs in the fall and spends the winter in in egg or larval form, but the life history needs to be explained better. 72.177.123.145 (talk) 16:26, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[A]dults are of two forms" 

message: The unusual hyphen in the specific name c-album is worth a brief remark. How does it come about?--Wetman (talk) 18:51, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  c-hyphen-album 

message: I have seen (and photographed) this butterfly in Pembrokeshire last year and today, but I don't want to edit the Welsh distribution in the article without formal evidence, so just noting here for reference. Tony Holkham (Talk) 11:34, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hutchinsoni variation seen in Pembrokeshire 

message: Hi, I am currently editing the P. c-album page for my Behavioral Ecology class. I have added several sections including Taxonomy and phylogeny, Food resources, Parental care, Life history, Protective coloration and behavior,  Mating, Physiology, and Interaction with humans. Catejiang (talk) 03:06, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing 

message: Overall the article looks really good! Lots of info in accessible language. I made a few minor edits to wording and added some small descriptions of some terms I thought were unclear. Mllutz (talk) 23:09, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer edit
Talk:John de Mol Jr.

message: Should there be a remark on Controversy after the recent Boos documentary? 2A02:A210:527:9800:49C2:D543:25AF:A006 (talk) 15:33, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: @rafaellerianotv_oficial 177.69.3.154 (talk) 14:15, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rafael Leriano TV
Talk:Edward Pease (railway pioneer)

message: Edward Pease was NOT a member of Parliament, as this article used to say.  It was his son Joseph who became an MP in 1832.  I just found it out.  The mistake appears to have been based on this ambiguous website:    http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/RApease.htm.
Logophile 09:51, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that was his son Joseph Pease (1799-1872). — Dunc|☺ 21:38, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: spartacus is fairly unreliable.  Also I think Edward Pease had more than three sons.  Some sources mention Isaac Pease who died the day before the opening of the new railway so Edward Pease and his family did not actually attend the opening ceremonies.  --Erp 01:24, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The sons of Edward Pease, including Henry (currently Redlinked) are dealt with in Edward Pease's article in ODNB.   ---Vernon White 22:40, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ginsu knife

message: I've just removed this from the article (and tidied it a little), as it's not relevant to the subject.  It might be used for an article on 'Dial Media', I suppose, if there's a call for such a thing:
 
Valenti and Becher opened advertising agency "Dial Media" on a shoestring budget, writing and producing their own two-minute commercial that literally crammed the content of a twenty-five minute demonstration of The Miracle Painter within it.  The offbeat, high-energy commercials which opened with a man in a tuxedo painting a ceiling were an incredible success, leading Dial Media to expand their business to include a number of other items marketed in the same rapid-fire manner.  Many of the duo's catch phrases actually became part of the lexicon and are used and even parodied today, phrases such as "now how much would you pay?" and "but wait, there's more! Dial's use of comedy combined with research into purchasing prime television advertising time, the use of toll-free telephone numbers to place orders and acceptance of credit cards was the forerunner of today's direct marketing industry.  According to the company's website those items included:
*The Miracle Slicer
*The Miracle Duster
*Claudette Louberge Hosiery
*Royal Durasteel
*Vacufresh
*The "Chainge" Adjustable Necklace
*Lusterware Flatware
*Armourcote Cookware and the subject of this article,
*Ginsu Knives
Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 10:15, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Manic Street Preachers

message: I’ve been adding a bit of info to this page recently and it seems to me that the entire History section is way too long and detailed, even in comparison to other bands’ pages. I feel like it should be greatly cut down for ease of reading, although obviously still covering major events, all albums, etc. Does this sound like a fair idea? GloverMist (talk) 18:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, the history is far too long, especially so for some of the more recent albums there is far too much detail. Polyamorph (talk) 07:03, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

text: I've started the process of cutting it down. To be honest what remains probably also needs a rewrite and resourcing. Polyamorph (talk) 09:59, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks very much! That’s really good work, it’s appreciated. GloverMist (talk) 21:51, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup history section
Talk:St. Petersburg paradox

message: If someone plays the game 64 times he will on average win:
 $2 32 times = $64, $4 16 times =$64 $8 8 times = $64, $16 4 times = 64 , $32 2 times = 64, $64 once = $64 (plus one more go)
So he can expect just over 6*64 = 384 dollars.
Your expected winnings is (log base 2)+1 times the number of times you play. While it's true this tends to infinity if you keep playing forever, you would require a huge bankroll to get started. If they set the cost at $11 you would need to play around 1024 games to reach profit on average. So you would require around $10,000 to minimize the probability of ruin. And it would take days. 
It's not a very good casino game, or much of a paradox. 2A00:23C6:3081:4501:418A:247D:1682:B772 (talk) 00:49, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The solution is obvious 

message: ? Xx236 (talk) 06:46, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theory or [[Expected utility hypothesis]] ?
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/April 20, 2005

message: I suggest using :Image:FED3-4.jpg as a replacement image for this "featured blurb" (I'm currently browsing through them, and some are still protected from when they were on the main page - shouldn't the protection have been removed?). Carcharoth 22:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done and unprotected. —Ruud 22:55, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested replacement pic
Talk:1000Fryd

message: Very much a work in progress - please give it a few days and I (the originator) will have other people add info...
See also: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Aalborg-Denmark/1000Fryd/258154360230?v=photos (note: not sure what is the sharing status of pictures put on facebook?) 77.213.98.162 (talk) 07:39, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Russell Tribunal/Archive 1

message: Note: to make this archive easier to read, I have added subheadings and attempted to indent text where necessary.  If I have made mistakes in my attempt, please feel free and revert the changes or modify them to make things correct.  KC9CQJ 11:16, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: In what way was the Tribunal not a show trial?  -- SEWilco 20:12, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Show trial
Talk:Edge (wrestler)

message: Kinda irritating that they are constantly editing the page today. The page also has it's text rearranged. I think it looked better with the currently signed part put ahead of the part about his 31 championships User112889 (talk) 23:27, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The constant anon edits are getting ridiculous 

message: Tokyo Pro Wrestling
CCW Tag Team Championship (1 time) - with Ken Johnson[340]
CCW Tag Team Championship Tournament (1998) - with Ken Johnson[340]
change to:
CCW Tag Team Championship (1 time) – with Ken Johnson[340]
CCW Tag Team Championship Tournament (1998) – with Ken Johnson[340]
i mean should change "-" to "–" so the profile can be looked formally! 27.2.142.30 (talk) 05:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: BelowTheSun  (T•C) 13:41, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 2 October 2023
Talk:Oină

message: Is it really a sport? I thought it was some form of Romanian theater. Scott Gall 11:50, 2005 Apr 19 (UTC)
Yes is a realy  sport. Mihai ROMANIA
From the description, the game sounds a lot more like cricket than baseball. 220.253.52.9 15:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I enhanced the article with what was available on the federation's website, and an English-translated animation of the pitch. The article was moved to oină, and generally cleaned up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayceman (talk • contribs) 22:25, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I improved the article. I still have to do the „prindere la mijloc”, organizational stuff, kits, bats, and things like that at some point. Ayceman (talk) 21:10, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article clean-up and enhanced
Talk:Clayton Township, Genesee County, Michigan

message: where does clayton end so i can avoid all those cops?
*lol - yeah, ever since the new police department and millage (for a small township - that's Rod Shumaker's supervising for you), the cops have been busting speeders like nobody's business. I got a ticket last summer. I'm not bitter, though - the cops and politicians there are my friends (just not enough to get out of a ticket). DDerby 00:19, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Category talk:Society of Saint Pius X

message: I would suggest that this category be merged into Category:Lefebvrism, as Lefebvrism is, as a movement, much larger than merely the SSPX, and includes, besides the autonomous SSPX sisters, also the Transalpine Redemptorists, the Dominicans of Avrille, etc.
:It sounds like you may have something there. But there seems to be a hurdle you are going to have to clear first. There is already an entry for "Lefebvrist" and it redirects to the article on the Society of St. Pius X. That means it is basically considered synonymous, and you are suggesting it is not. It seems to me that you are going to have to get consensus first to getting a separate article on Lefebvrist/ism, and define it well. This would seem to be the reasonable, chronological step to renaming this category. Good luck! --Glossando 15:04, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please move
Talk:Von (album)

message: Sorry, but what exactly is the meaning of the 12th track? ssenkraD?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.181.83.208 (talk) 21:26, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation
Talk:Pinguicula

message: Unless someone objects, I am going to attempt to translate the German language version of this page into English, as it is much more well-developed. This will take some time, and so the page will be in various stages of development over the next few days. NoahElhardt 17:05, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've completed the translation/revision. Any and all comments on how to improve the page are welcomed. I'm thinking that the introduction could probably stand being longer, although I'm not sure what information I should use to flesh it out. NoahElhardt 14:45, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest reducing the number of headers - several short paragraphs could be combined under single headers. As a general tip, avoid using separate headers for paragraphs with less than 20 lines or so - MPF 23:07, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision/Translation

message: I'm considering moving the list of Pinguicula species to a seperate page, since this is a rather long page already and the list is over 80 members long. Yay or Nay? NoahElhardt 06:13, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. I appreciate the work you're doing in this article. JoJan 18:09, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Species List 

message: Does anyone know how to get rid of them? Kotare 08:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big white spaces between blocks of text in this article