lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Steve Parker (Neighbours)

message: Am I right in thinking that the character had never been mentioned before his entry, despite both brothers having lived in Ramsay Street for years?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MartinUK (talk • contribs) 00:20, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *Character written out - JuneGloom  Talk 21:14, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Should the page title be edited to include some sort of specification of the nature of the page, given the number of alternative "Steve Parkers" that exist on Wikipedia?  E.g Steve Parker (television character)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by WienerCornDog (talk • contribs) 16:57, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this discussion should have been left open for more than one day, so that other editors could have the chance to join in. It's too late now, but I would have pointed out that Steven Parker already incorporates all the Steve Parkers, and the correct disambiguation for this page would be Steve Parker (Neighbours). - JuneGloom07 Talk 01:55, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You should have waited for the discussion to happen. Why bother asking the question if you were not willing to discuss it.. You created the article about the artist Steve Parker and had already made your decision.Rain the 1 10:23, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title
Talk:Henry Ramsay (Neighbours)

message: * - 1 H&A AnnualRain the 1 BAM 12:14, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You will have a really good chance too with Henry. The ref is in use at Bobby Simpson, as ref number [1] - that is if you need all the work/title/publisher info... =)Rain the 1 BAM 17:02, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! - JuneGloom  Talk 17:03, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Christina Alessi

message: What does anyone else think about changing Christina's name back to Alessi? That is what she is/was best known by before she got married and since she is no longer married to Paul, her name would be Alessi again. - JuneGloom07  Talk?  15:27, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, since no one has objected I'm moving the page to Christina Alessi. - JuneGloom07  Talk?  15:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Surname

message: Also the name of a financial news reporter on Bloomberg Financial TV. Note spelling difference.
http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=17389826&authType=NAME_SEARCH&authToken=qatc&locale=en_US&srchid=9f13377b-dc09-4da0-84f8-1f559cfaff81-0&srchindex=2&srchtotal=3&goback=.fps_PBCK_*1_cristina_alesci_*1_*1_*1_*1_*2_*1_Y_*1_*1_*1_false_1_R_*1_*51_*1_*51_true_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2&pvs=ps&trk=pp_profile_name_link
http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Alesci_Cristina_1290216291.aspx
http://www.linkedin.com/in/cristinaalesci
71.110.202.44 (talk) 21:45, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:Joel Samuels

message: *Rain the 1 BAM 15:58, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Marco Silvani

message: * - Sheepish looks.Rain the 1 BAM 04:17, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Bree Timmins

message: Wikipedia doesn't discuss speculation; its standard is wikipedia:verifiability.  I've removed a reference to rumors that this character will return. --TS 12:59, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rumors
Talk:Nina Tucker

message: The soap show ref is laid out on Serena Bishop (ref number 2) and is ready to be put in this. The info is that Nina's planned relationship with Connor was scrapped and given to Carmella after Goodrem's diagnosis, which Blair explicitly states in the interview.RAIN*the*ONE BAM 17:04, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it going to be added, I don't know where to put it.RAIN*the*ONE BAM 14:26, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: What time does this occur in the interview? - JuneGloom  Talk 17:22, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

text: It's part 21 she mentions the info about Connor from the start, part 20 1:00 in she talks about delta.RAIN*the*ONE BAM 17:47, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers, I'll add it in a bit later. It's just in case someone (most likely the GA reviewer) asks. - JuneGloom  Talk 18:00, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Source
Talk:Salatut elämät

message: "First and only Finnish soap opera"? Hardly! For example Kotikatu is older than "Salkkarit".--85.76.51.143 (talk) 19:27, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Fur wedge cap

message: There were DEU versions being issued in 1992; I still have the one I was issued in Cornwallis, with the 'bag' being black (aka "navy blue"). I also remember one of the gents in my section having an Air Force blue 'bag' on his. I'll see if I can find out from someone in the supply system when this item was discontinued as issue kit.   ¥    Jacky Tar  06:12, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

message: This article seems to be the only usage of this unusual term. It isn't in ref 1. Ref 2 isn't; a live broadcast from 2008 isn't available 16 years later. Humpster (talk) 18:50, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Envelope busby
Template talk:The Bold and the Beautiful

message: There are currently two characters by year lists, The Bold and the Beautiful characters (2013) and The Bold and the Beautiful characters (2014), that need adding to this template. I was unsure where they should go, so I'm hoping someone with a knowledge of the template or the show could help. - JuneGloom  Talk 16:33, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters by year
Talk:Fitness First

message: I think some reference should be made to Fitness First contracts and how difficult it is to leave the club without incurring heavy fees or direct debits for the rest of your life---
219.90.251.132 (talk) 00:40, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Fitness First is an international company, yet this article seems to focus explicitly on Australia, even mentioning some seemingly trivial "complaints" about the company, which are more to do with that specific location than the company as a whole (e.g. the person getting pushed down the stairs). I recommend a lot of the Australia-specific stuff be deleted, unless it is in the form of an example. The complaints section should be trimmed to what's relevant for Fitness First, not for individual locations. Thoughts? MatttK (talk) 22:55, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: International or Australian?
Talk:Ringlestone

message: What's the pronunciation supposed to be? kwami (talk) 09:02, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Having lived locally for some 25 years, I have always understood it to be "Ringle-" (as in 'jingle' or 'tingle') and "-stone" (usual pronunciation). I put the IPA formulation together but I'm not a linguist so am happy to be corrected. Dick G (talk) 01:19, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the IPA was fine, but it didn't match the sound-alike transcription, so I thought maybe there was something unusual going on. kwami (talk) 01:26, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: This place is in the Domesday Book and there is some other coverage so I don't think this should be merged. Crouch, Swale (talk)  11:08, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Closed with no merge given this objection and no case for. Klbrain (talk) 13:30, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Juan Domingo de Monteverde

message: --2601:241:2:8E30:84C4:2068:EA59:6457 (talk) 21:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Levan Mchedlidze

message: Hey, thanks for creating this page. --Rastrelli f 07:20, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome! --Gaúcho 13:10, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Toledo

message: I do not find in the list the name of cardinal Consalvo Rodriguez (+1299), buried in a magnificent tomb in basilica Sta Maria Maggiore in Rome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.83.11.134 (talk) 07:22, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Names

message: Is this vandalism? This name was added 14 years ago by an IP at . (it might break WP:RECORDS!) ―Eduardogobi (talk) 21:05, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Ubayd Allah ben Qasim

message: This really should not just  be a long list of bishops, surely this could use a history section like every other diocese. A list of prominent churches would also be appropriate. Magjozs (talk) 14:10, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This needs a history section.
Talk:Caroline affair

message: I have assessed this as Start Class, as it contains more detail and organization than would be expected of a Stub (barely) and of low importance, as I feel the events in question are more critical to Britain and the United States than Canada. Cheers, CP 16:32, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: I wonder if the quotation contains a typo.  In "though of holding them responsible," should "though" be "thought"?  I am sure that is the meaning, but unsure if this could be an alternate spelling or a mistake in the original source.
:Looks like a typo to me. I've fixed it. Pburka (talk) 02:18, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotation typo? 

message: :
So, beyond 2087? —Tamfang (talk) 08:00, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've put the sic template at that point.  It could be a typo for "over 150 years"? But I don't have the source to check it. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 19:05, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  centuries 

message: This article states that Amos Durfee, the alleged rebel martyr, was African American, but doesn't provide a direct citation for this. Does anyone know where that information comes from? LeftAlberta1968 (talk) 20:58, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  African American? 

message: The article doesn’t say whether the British actions in the Caroline affair passed the Caroline test.  —Michael Z. 02:13, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There was no international or binational tribunal that assessed the issue, so not possible to say.  The US and Britain settled it by the treaty. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:44, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, but it’s not even clear whether in the treaty they agreed that the affair had been justified or not.  —Michael Z. 13:32, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Treaties are generally prospective.  The parties enter into them to resolve issues, but generally without commenting on past liability:  "agree to disagree" sort of thing.  The treaty in this case provided solutions going forward, such as Article X, which provided for extradition of fugitives.  Treaties that allocate blame don't always fare so well, as the "war guilt" clause in the Treaty of Versailles demonstrates. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 19:50, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  —Michael Z. 14:13, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pass or fail?
Talk:Laura Winslow

message: yeaaaaah merge  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.91.2.124 (talk) 10:12, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, why should we merge it? A mere statement such as  "yeaaaaah merge" is just the same as the various non-arguments in arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Please, explain why we should merge these articles? [[Briguy52748 (talk) 12:29, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: merge
Talk:KKSS

message: S 41.36.114.59 (talk) 22:23, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ZamalaK1911 

message: S 41.36.114.59 (talk) 22:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zamalak1911
Talk:Frances Pinter

message: (See above comment by creator of article and template headings): The article needs to comply with Wikipedia:Neutral point of view as well as its other editing policies; see links above.  It may need further rewriting; it should not merely be a copy or (after changed) mostly a reflection of the subject's point of view on herself.  --NYScholar (talk) 23:41, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality and full citations
Talk:Your Face

message: This page has been deleted, and protected to prevent re-creation. why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.192.186.102 (talk • contribs)  --Vlad|-> 16:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems the content would be very similar to Your Mom insults.--65.93.163.81 01:18, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Defence Research and Development Canada

message: The following tags were added to this article in June 2016:
The article looks very different now than it did then, and I don't see any glaring issues remaining, so I've boldly removed the tags. I did notice lack of (inline) references in 'Research Centres' and 'Civilian achievements' sections so added Template:Cite-section tags. 213.233.155.157 (talk) 18:49, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I mostly agree, but I have now removed the sections lacking independent sources since 2016. There had been neutrality issues remaining, praising the "numerous innovations and inventions" of the article subject. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:56, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed multiple issues tags
Talk:The Guardian of Education

message: Does anyone have an image of part of the Guardian of Education that we could use for this page? Thanks. Awadewit | talk 16:17, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: Thanks to all of the vandal-fighters who worked hard to revert vandalism during this article's appearance on the main page! Awadewit (talk) 23:06, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thank you!
Talk:Malua (horse)

message: Malua is a notable Australian Thoroughbred racehorse of the 19th Century who won the 1884 Melbourne Cup, the Australian Cup and Grand National Hurdle. The creator of the article is a newbie. Please give him time to expand the article. - Cuddy Wifter 08:21, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:S-1 Executive Committee

message: There is another picture of the group at the Bohemian Grove in the Stephane Groueff book Manhattan Project (1967, Collins, London) talen in the same place (fireplace) but with 9 people including Oppy & Nichols Hugo999 (talk) 11:11, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

message: We can see in the section of S-1 Project as below:
:On December 18, 1941, Vannevar Bush held a meeting to organize an accelerated uranium-235 research project managed by Arthur Compton, with Harold Urey researching gaseous diffusion for uranium enrichment and Ernest Lawrence to research electromagnetic enrichment techniques.
:The next day, the Japanese Empire's attack on Pearl Harbor led to the United States entry into the war. Four days later, Germany declared war on the United States. At a meeting on December 18 the S-1 project was dedicated to development of a uranium bomb.
The day when Japan attacked on Pearl Harbor is 8th December 1941 (7th December 1941 in USA time). I wonder if the date of the meeting that Vannevar Bush held is wrong.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bletilla (talk • contribs) 01:07, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: The date of the meeting that Vannevar Bush held
Talk:Bounty

message: Please think about adding reference to bounties paid by countries for export (similar to export subsidies).80.235.62.140 08:35, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: (Export) bounty

message: 'thing', could we not use a different word than that? What about object?
91.106.66.182 11:21, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bounty (reward)
Talk:Crowd control

message: * What about crowd control during heists? Isn't that phrase used fairly commonly?--Dominik92 (talk) 05:41, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heist 

message: In the introduction, the term 'line management' is used: "Crowd control is also the term used to describe the specific products that are used to implement line management..."  Could this be clarified or given a link because I don't know what it means, so others may not either.  Maybe it's a USA term that isn't used in the UK.  Thanks.  AndrooUK (talk) 23:07, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Line Management' 
Talk:British armoured fighting vehicle production during World War II

message: I'm not sure of the relationship between the DIrector and Chief Engineer in roles and responsibilities.  Several sources quote the Director as still being the same man, but he's not on the tank board any more, once Robotham is brought in.  There doesn't seem to be any definition of responsibilities that I can find.  Lkchild (talk) 06:54, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it and updated article  - he was outside of the hierarchy, but coordinated between DTD and industry  [[[User:Lkchild|Lkchild]] (talk) 23:49, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Chief Engineer /Director of Tank Design

message: I've added some detail, but I'm really not sure on the production numbers - there are some wildly different numbers in different articles. Lkchild (talk) 09:47, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Carriers
Talk:Peter Cox (author)

message: I'm not sure how to move the existing Peter Cox page to a page just for that particular person, because there needs to be a generic "Peter Cox" page pointing to the various others, as this is a very common name.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnbuckman (talk • contribs) 09:17, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment 2

message: If God did not want us to eat animals, they would not be wrapped in meat.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ga1lyons (talk • contribs) 03:55, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The content of author's work... 

message: The gallery at Peter_Cox_%28author%29#Other really should go. None of these pictures contribute anything new to the article that the main picture does not. They are clearly promotional shots. Wikipedia is not a promotional tool. One illustrating portrait is enough.
If anyone would like to suggest any of the other pictures to become the main pictures, you are welcome to do so.--ZayZayEM 07:19, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Narcissm 

message: I see nothing here to substantiate the "best-selling vegetarian book of all time" quoted in DYK.  Is there any evidence?  I'd add a  tag if it was in the text of the article.  PamD 07:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I now see it's sourced in the lead sentence... in 1994.  There's been a lot of interest in vegetarianism since then, so this looks a bit iffy. PamD 09:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  source for DYK? 

message: I feel this article is too one-sided. Whiilst Cox's book may well ahve been a best seller in its time, it does not have a sales ranking currently on Amazon and there are plenty of other books on the subject which are still being sold. Anyway, what does "The best selling book on vegetarianism" actually mean? There are plenty of vegetarians but do they buy cookery books or books about animal cruelty or books on how to be a vegetarian? Dunno, but the first 2 I think. 
The advert section needs to come out. The point about his being President of the vegetarians for 6 weeks and then having to leave could do with a longer discussion. Taken with his argument with his Headteacher (Johnny could not then go to university) this may suggest difficulty in working with people, or,  expecting too much of them. 
I know nothing of him or the veg. soc. but this article needed more balance. He may be a wonderful person, but at present it looks like hagiography. 
Fifthmonarchist 
FifthMonarchy 08:52, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  General approach
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Books/List of books by title: M

message: mohamed nomer Almadani
penseur arabe
Ecrivnt, journalist ,  rechercheur  syrien  tres connu  au  monde  arabe
Diplome  universitaire
Interresse aux recherché religieux et  psychos.
 Il a  9 livres  en  Arabic tres connus et lisant.
Nee` 1961 Damas. Musulman.
Ses livres:
Jewish  opposition to Zionism
 L`islam regit – il L`europpe?
 Loi d`holocaust , foi de detruire selon les juifes.
- (Knots Andalusiaand Islamization of Europe)600 pages 
monomr@yahoo.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.144.0.101 (talk) 09:20, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Infobox Anglican Church

message: Surely Anglicanism refers to the many denominations, provinces and churches that make up the Anglican Communion? As such, isn't it misleading to use the term "Anglican Church" as the name for this infobox? Unless, of course, the infobox is only intended to appear on pages of those individual churches which: (a) consider themselves to be members of the Anglican Communion; and (b) are not otherwise part of any province or denomination? ;-) GrahamSmith (talk) 06:52, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox name
Talk:Vice-Admiral of Cheshire

message: Per official sources from the RN, Navy List, the title was a command position listed under "Admirals of the coast of Great Britain sources also list" the title as "Vice Admiral of the coast of" have added military command info box in line with other RN fleet and command articles.--Navops47 (talk) 05:13, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved article
Talk:Lockers

message: The page "Lockers" appears to duplicate the page "Locker" - that is, until I added a couple of entries to the "Surname" section of "Locker", which have appeared only in "Locker" but not "Lockers" - thus showing that the two pages are independent, even if they began with identical content.
I understand that titles of Wikipedia pages that are nouns should usually be in the singular, not the plural, or that, if a plural entry is considered worth including, it should be merely a redirection to the main entry under the singular title.
So I would propose that this page should be deleted, although I don't feel sure enough of this to do it myself.  My editing of the singular version shows that there is a danger of two essentially identical pages (one superfluous) diverging from each other as a result of edits, and maybe ending up quite different from each other.
(Should I add my surname entries to the other article too, or delete the superfluous one, or just let the two diverge from each other?)
M.J.E. 09:43, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Category talk:Salvation Army officers

message: How does this work the Salvation Army doesn't have "Clergy" :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:01, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Renamed in Jan 2014 from clergy to officers. – Fayenatic London 10:40, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Template talk:Army units

message: This template currently depicts Battalions and Squadrons as synonomous.  While this is true in some armies, in others (such as the British Army), the Squadron is synonomous with the Company.  Should the template be changed to reflect this? MartinMcCann 10:07, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Battalion/Squadron/Company

message: There should be a pair here (like Canadian fireteams, or a sniper pair - shooter and spotter) 70.51.11.224 (talk) 06:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pair

message: an individual combatant is the smallest military unit. Everything is based around this unit. (until replaced by robots) 70.51.11.224 (talk) 07:01, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  individual 

message: Is this template necessary, it seems to have all the information the "Chain of Command" box has. We don't really need two do we?--$1LENCE D00600D (talk) 04:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Necessary

message: This table attempts to display current NATO unit symbology, but is incorrect. It displays a single dot for a fireteam, which is incorrect. A circle with a line through it, as seen in the information on the page on Military Organization, is the correct symbol. This chart is actually wrong all the way through. I think it should be deleted or corrected with a current military manual.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.111.181.124 (talk) 22:57, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Symbology

message: The page for chalk has issues, but it ought to be included under the temporary category. I'm going to add it, and refine the chalk page in the near future Glazerr (talk) 19:53, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chalk