Talk:AdventureQuest

message: The AQ Updates page says the game is in version 35.0, while the Wikipedia page says it's at 35.05. see:AQ:UpdatesExoKiller4 (talk) 23:51, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Version 35.0 or 35.05?

message: Artix Entertainment Announced that they are currently working on another game named 'Warp Force'. It is suppose to use the storyline from Adventure Quest and continue from that. Should we add a sub-section for it? Eugenekoh12 (talk) 09:03, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A small one with only very GENERAL info on it AND a link to the Wikipedia page for it. Its a separate game compared to AQ, wether or not they ARE the same storyline. It should not be really in a separate page that has little to do with it. Mr Kirby XIII (talk) 21:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Warp Force

message: I have recently created a Wikiproject Called Wikipedia:Wikiproject Artix Entertainment. If you guys could join and help out that'd be awesome! We really need help with starting some Artix Entertainment related Articles. Thanks! :^) §†SupaSoldier†§ 01:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What is a Wikiproject?! I've seen it a lot, but I have no clue WHAT it is. Please, someone give me an answer. Thanks. Mr Kirby XIII (talk) 21:10, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Wikiproject Artix Entertainment]] 

message: I have archived the talk page. Will get to the Dragonfable page in a few days.
ɫ§Veonyx§ɫ ~Talk to Me~~My Acts~ 01:19, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There's not much of a need right now - I'd wait till there around 30-40 posts. Unless we want to keep an on-going archive where we do part at a time and then add more to it later. That could work. Also, you generally don't archive discussions that were recently posted on. --Eruhildo (talk) 02:31, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived 

message: I don't see how Z-Tokens fit for Guardianship at all. If it were Upgrades like Mechquest and Dragonfable pages, it could go under but Z-Tokens have nothing at all to do with being a Guardian except the extra boost of 300 Z-Tokens. --Den5328954 (talk) 23:52, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. Could you please fix that? I don't have the time to do it myself right now. --Eruhildo (talk) 15:57, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Z-Tokens 

message: How are we suppose to include 3rd party sources when battleon isn't that big yet?
ɫ§Veonyx§ɫ ~Talk to Me~~My Acts~ 00:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We may not be able to find any for a while, but I'll look around for some next week. --Eruhildo (talk) 01:17, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is obviously going to me a major problem for the project later. Good third-party references are almost non-existant. We can't produce something that doesn't exist, so what is it we're supposed to do? I'm as confused about this as the rest of you might be. --Netaviofhell (talk) 18:38, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Actually you get a random amount between 1 - 20.←Fridae'§Doom→ 08:16, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

text: I believe Adventurers get 1-25 and Guardians get 1-50.ExoKiller4 (talk) 04:33, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Header 

message: OK, so I haven't been on Wikipedia all that long, but how much vandalism is a lot of vandalism? This article has been vandalised six times in the past two days, and it's barely even noon where I live. How much vandalism does there need to be before it's bad enough to need to protect the page? Alinnisawest (talk) 15:18, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like it may be enough to bring it up with WP:RFP. Can't hurt to try - at the worst they'll tell you "no". ^_^ --Eruhildo (talk) 03:43, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you done it yet? Otherwise, I'll go post there. Alinnisawest (talk) 18:36, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Never mind, we have semi-protection! For three months!' Thank goodness, maybe now there won't be vandalism every time I log in! Alinnisawest (talk) 19:07, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: I've noticed someone on the Adventure Quest page keeps putting down Normal Knight Armor and Heavy Knight Armor. There is no such thing as Heavy Knight Armor. There is only Knight Armor! Huntsmanguy (talk) 19:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, just make note of such things in your edit summary. --Eruhildo (talk) 03:49, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually Heavy Knight Armor is available from that Rogue Quest where you fight that guy in Heavy Tank Armor at least to my recollection.←Fridae'§Doom→ 08:18, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heavy Knight armor. 

message: I added the houses on the list . It is right , isn't it ? -- User : Andra2404
:Yes, it was right. I have tweaked it to include the brand new estate info. This has been long overdue. Thanks!
:ɫ§Veonyx§ɫ ~Talk to Me~~My Acts~ 03:24, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Houses

message: I do not think it's necesarry . AdventureQuest's article is already too long and AdventureQuest has many characters .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andra2404 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree this article is too long. Unfortunately, I haven't had time to clean it up myself. Once the character list has been trimmed down to just main characters and this article has been cleaned up, I don't think merging them will be a problem. --Eruhildo (talk) 05:38, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: While I agree with the sentiment, I must ask how main characters would be defined in a game such as Adventure Quest.  The character of Zorbak tends to pop up often, but his character is more comic relief than central to any story.  Galrick was a major character in the latter parts of the Devourer Saga, but his character had virtually no presence outside of the those quests and cutsceens directly tied in with The'Galin's arrival.  Is Artix a major or minor character?  What about Galanoth?  Cyrus?  Safira?  Wolfwing?  Cerena?  Twilly?  The clan leaders of Paxia?  The list goes on and on.  And with the exception of Twilly, all of the aforementioned characters have had story segments devoted to them.  The problem, however, is that most of those story segments don't share a common ground which would unify them.  So the question again becomes how we define "main" characters in a game as non-linear as Adventure Quest? 141.166.234.196 (talk) 05:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say that if a storyline is available for a player who has started playing at any point in time (in other words part of the permanent storyline), it is probably part of the main storyline. Though I agree that AQ is rather non-liner as far as RPGs go. As for who counts as a major character, that's a little hard to say. Let's discuss that on the project talk page. --Eruhildo (talk) 03:31, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Characters of AdventureQuest Merging

message: I came to get information on the RPG AdventureQuest and all that was on the page was TYLER IS STUPID!!!.  I am not sure who erased all the information on the page and put that, but I do not think that it is appropriate and it seems as though this has happened before.  Therefore, I was wondering how many times does it take for a page to be vandalized before it is protected?
Since I am new at editing Wikipedia, I felt it was necessary to leave a message here and let the expert Wikipedia editors and those that know the game get rid of it and re-edit the page.  Thank You (｡◕‿◕｡)  --Pugpugsley (talk) 18:04, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I restored the article and send warning messages to the two vandalisers.--Megaman en m (talk) 18:08, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Vandalism happens - some people out there are just jerks. Looking through the history, I notice that vandalism has picked up again, so I put in a request to have this article semi-protected. We'll just have to wait to see if they think it's been bad enough. --Eruhildo (talk) 17:03, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism ~ Once Again!!

message: Hey.
This article features too much stuff like "Warlic's Shop" or whatever and that will just throw the reader off if he/she doesn't know what they are.  We should write other pages about these parts of the games and link there.
:Naah, there isn't much description there. Only used once. Can you give me all the jargons? --Mark Chung (talk) 12:16, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Create other links? 

message: I think I might replace the gameplay section with the one in my sandbox soon. Just a warning (although I don't think anyone will protest if I do). I think mine's much better written and has some unneeded sections removed.
±µŒ ¤₦€ ₮ł-łË \/ʉ₦฿ʉ£§ ₣ÆÅ₩ ( ₮ / ©) 04:24, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Eh

message: When I used to play adventure quest, I remember how it was very interactive with its players. It often had special events for real holidays. One main thing that caught my eye about AQ was how it had a certain crowdsourcing aspect about it in which the game designers made it so fans and players could suggest ideas for the games. These ideas could and were often small things such as a new weapon idea, or a new monster for the game. Sometimes larger things were suggested like story lines.Dracothejuggler (talk) 03:19, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A crowdsourced project 

message: i think that we need to put something about the species you know vampire, werewolf, werepyre, and dracopyre  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.145.78.183 (talk) 01:22, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: species

message: I noticed this while I was reading the article, and it seems to contradict itself:
Server cap
There is a limit to the amount of free players who can play simultaneously, depending on the time of day and factored server load. The limit was fixed at 4,000 during the early days of AdventureQuest,[citation needed] but it currently fluctuates from 2,000 to 4,500.[4] Guardians and X-Guardians may login at any time, regardless of the server limit. Due to the server cap, free players trying to log in at busy hours of the day, and even still, the server limit often spontaneously decreases when slots become available or filled.
Newly created free accounts are given 24 free account (not character) logins. AdventureQuest also provides an account confirmation that upon completion grants users another 48 hours of unlimited free logins.[5] Artix Entertainment defends the server cap as a way of controlling server load and covering the cost of hosting the game.[6] As of July 14, 2011, the Server Cap was removed forever.
Anyone feel like fixing this? Also, doesn't the sentence about the server cap need a citation?
Oh, and another point; Under the 'Houses' sub-section, it has the following text: "A few days after this was released, the cheapest Estate; the Forest Log Cabin Estate, was removed and became rare. It only costed 3,100 Z-Tokens." However, I'm looking at the shop right now, and the Forest Log Cabin Estate is still there. I also brought one about a month ago, well after the supposed removal of this House.
This article needs updating, and a good amount of TLC :)
--Phoenix Pyres (talk) 11:06, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Error? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on AdventureQuest. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.battleon.com/
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://forums2.battleon.com/f/tm.asp?m=15348788
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on AdventureQuest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20020802000307/http://www.battleon.com/ to http://www.battleon.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:08, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified