Talk:Moët & Chandon

message: I'm going to move this section that User:Agne27 removed arbitrarily and without moving it to the Talk Page to discuss. I believe citing refs. for this section is not hard, just need to find the lyrics and tag as necessary. I will start the work in a few days and move this section back in to the main article body. Payam81 14:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not just a matter of reference but also encyclopedic relevance. Moet & Chandon are serious champagne producers and Wikipedia's readership deserve at least GA glass article on this producer. There is nothing in the "pop culture" reference that offer any pertaining value or demonstration of this producer's reputation or influence that couldn't be summed up as Moet & Chandon is well known wine brand that has been mentioned in lyrics, books, and film with a single cite about the wine's influence. I would also point to WP:TRIVIA as well as Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information for other pertinent reasons to leave the cruft out. AgneCheese/Wine 09:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Image:Mandc.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This image appears to be a copyright violation, and looks to be simply lifted from the internet. The picture of the bottle is more of an advertising picture, not encyclpedic for the article, and could easily be replaced with free content (i.e. someone could take a picture and replace this copyrighted content with free content). I'm removing the link. If the author thinks otherwise, please defend.Veritasjohn 05:22, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Mandc.gif

message: This article was automatically  assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 07:32, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: :Image:Moet-brute.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 17:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Moet-brute.jpg

message: I removed the following regarding the "Be Fabulous" limited release:
This bottle has been sold in auctions for more than $2000 due to its rarity and limited quantity.
I did a web search and promptly found a bottle for under USD$100, and no mention of any such auction results. Manning (talk) 22:21, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed claim

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 03:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: I noticed that this article erroneously claims that Benedictine monk Dom Perignon invented the double fermentation method for making champaign. See Dom_Perignon_(person). Please rectify.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.100.197 (talk) 06:33, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dom Perignon

message: Some of the content in the Dom Perignon section comes from the merged article Dom Pérignon (wine). That article has sat dormant for quite some time and doesn't look to have any growth potential beyond the minuscule amount already written. As a wine brand, it is in the readers best interest to present this material within the greater context of the parent winery article. AgneCheese/Wine 18:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is probably because your account isn't yet "autoconfirmed". If you make 10 edits total then you shouldn't be prompted again when adding a link. Camw (talk) 14:51, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution note

message: Substituted at 00:34, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment