Talk:Mamoru Shinozaki

message: link title== When did the Japanese nationalists get ahold of this article?  ==
There are some pretty vitriolic claims that he misrepresented Japan,  and the source is...  an old article by a Japanese person,  in a book I'm not sure we have access to.  I wish butthurt special snowflakes would quit editing this article.  I'm as much of a Nipponphile as anyone (anime gen) bit Japanese racist war atrocities are pretty well-known.  Could someone edit article for facts and tone?  I don't know enough about this fellow to do it efficiently. Tabbycatlove (talk) 23:44, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The lede's obviously been given a once-over by some Nippon Kaigi type, but the body text in turn is credulous and sourced almost entirely to Shinozaki's own memoirs (or sources that just repeat them uncritically. The Singapore Infopedia article is actualy waaaaay better than what Wikipedia has rn. Basically Shinozaki probably did something to help Singaporeans but the famous "good conduct passes" are completely undocumented by anyone other than himself. So the article's a bit of a mess all around. 135.0.27.43 (talk) 07:11, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Mamoru Shinozaki. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070612154926/http://infopedia.nlb.gov.sg/articles/SIP_1222_2006-12-09.html to http://infopedia.nlb.gov.sg/articles/SIP_1222_2006-12-09.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070612155815/http://infopedia.nlb.gov.sg/articles/SIP_1221_2006-12-29.html to http://infopedia.nlb.gov.sg/articles/SIP_1221_2006-12-29.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070612160839/http://infopedia.nlb.gov.sg/articles/SIP_1220_2006-12-29.html to http://infopedia.nlb.gov.sg/articles/SIP_1220_2006-12-29.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:39, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: With the greatest respect, when the first (critical) source is from a Japanese government institution, it leads me to be concerned about the neutrality of the opinions stated. Indeed, the article remains poorly sourced throughout. It needs a rewrite. · | (talk - contributions) 21:35, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: To that extent, I'm adding a NPOV template. There's been a previous discussion on this, seemingly, and I don't think that concerns have been resolved all that much. · | (talk - contributions) 21:37, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Adding template is not a helpful method to improve this article, I think. Writing Shinozaki's article is very difficult because his autobiography is filled with lies, and many books which based on  Shinozaki's autobiography may reproduce Shinozaki's lies. Furthermore, not only the articles which written in English but the articles which written in Japanese and Chinese are important to know his true career　and acts. I don't know your mother language but if your mother language is English, I recommend you to read old day's Straits Times through this site, and don't rely　on Shinozaki's autobiography or books which suspected to cheating Shinozaki's autobiography. I also try to do so.--UikiHedeo (talk) 13:33, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: My temporary works ended. Please check the contents and if my edition solved NPOV problem, plese remove the template. If there still exist such problem, please point it out again.--UikiHedeo (talk) 11:52, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: A week has passed. I added citations and I guess that the NPOV problem resolved. So I removed NPOV template.--UikiHedeo (talk) 09:03, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deep concerns about the neutrality of this article 

message: I've tidied up some of the grammar but some of the sentences need to be made clearer. As I'm not familiar with the subject matter it's difficult to know how to best edit some of the text. PlantSwordfish (talk) 11:45, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. Thank you for your edition of the article. Would you point out which sentences need to be made clearer? I want to explain them more clearer.--UikiHedeo (talk) 14:38, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentence structure needs to be clearer 

message: How can I resist to such attack? --UikiHedeo (talk) 16:33, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page might be removed from Google search result