Talk:Great Rann of Kutch

message: Gujarat says: "The Rann of Kutchch covers a large portion of western Gujarat .... Only 500 years earlier, the area was the Arabian Sea." 
Rann of Kutch says: "The area was a vast shallows of the Arabian Sea until continuing geological uplift closed off the connection with the sea, creating a vast lake that was still navigable during the time of Alexander the Great." (Alexander the Great 356 BC - 323 BC). 
What are the facts here? When was this area actually part of the sea? -- Writtenonsand 21:07, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: When became dry land?

message: Little Rann Of Kutch was once a part of Arabian Sea. Many signs can be seen of that at near by village Zinzuwada. It seems that the whole of Saurashtra region was first an island, clues can be find out from a strip of land from Bhavnagar to Maliya Miyana where one can find the strip of that land is stil salty.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.169.51.169 (talk) 09:53, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have separated the article for Little Rann of Kutch, please help develop both.
mrigthrishna (talk) 06:55, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little Rann of Kutch 

message: More appropriate name: Changing name to "Great Rann of Kutch" as per old British India Maps: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bombay_Prov_north_1909.jpg ALSO SEE: Imperial Gazetteer of India, v. 26, Atlas 1909 edition, "Bombay, p. 36. http://dsal.uchicago.edu/reference/gaz_atlas_1909/pager.html?object=42
mrigthrishna (talk) 04:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Changing name (moving) to "Great Rann of Kutch"

message: The following sectionwas in article Little Rann of Kutch, obviously out of place. I am putting it here, for possible merging. 
Please remove it when merge is completed. Yceren Loq (talk) 16:42, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  a piece from Little Rann 

message: An image used in this article, File:Royal Enfield in The Rann.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:34, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Royal Enfield in The Rann.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Few issues, please read, reply and only then take action:
* Ref 1: Dead link, overly long ref name.
* No references are being used in the proper format.
:If needed, Add this to your vector.js : importScript('User:Smith609/toolbox.js'); . It'll add a Cite addition tool. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:50, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you're going to add a citation, please use the following format:
 ... 
Please refrain from just using the link and link name in between "[]". --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:13, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks a lot Srikanth, will take care of those all things in future. --Subha (Talk) (talk) 04:34, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:41, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I wonder about the history of the rann, especially about the story of it once being part of the Arabian Sea. As to my knowledge swamps, moors and fens come into being after the work of humans only. That is, solid ground is removed and fills with water and organic matter very slowly. A new ecosystem develops which is totally different from the one before, with flora and fauna as well as chirr battis.
The question is: Is the ground of the rann below sea level or below the surface level of the nearer environment? And has its water the same salt like the sea? 
My suggestion is as follows:
- early settlement; deforestation and mining activities; this led to extended 'wholes' in the ground taking whatever incoming water and matter; the shallow lake of a remote past turns into a permanent swamp. 
A moor takes about 1000 years to develop after the human activities stopped (in Middle Europe, without the monsoon which perhaps has a larger effect on the processes).
Mining could have included ore (copper, silver, iron) and/or salt, and touched veins at or hardly below the surface of the ground.  
The salty character of the marsh or fen could then result either from
- a layer of salt in the ground which was not processed and is below the soil, or
- the remains of the salt mining, creating a new soil together with the incoming organic matter
- the mixture of different qualities of ground water from different ground levels, i.e. the confluence of light acidious and light base water which results in salty or brackish water.
A further raw material in the region could have been clay. Exploitation of clay fields leaves larger hollows in the ground as well, which, filling up, develop into a swamp, marsh or moor. The development of a thicker clay or loam layer in the ground needs a (natural) water basin already, with heavy clay/loam being the deposit of matter brought in by a river or stream. 
Another question is linked to that: Was the clay, if there was, mixed with salt and did this produce another type of bricks, perhaps harder bricks than pure clay bricks? (I remember a form of pastime or hobby material, a material called 'salt dough' (German: Salzteig), something like plasticine, which was burnable and much harder than the burnable plasticine or loam/clay. It further had a different colour, a whitish/greenish color with brown or grey spots after burning. The material was used for making things, decorations etc. with the hands by children. It could be formed very well, was heavy, one exemplar was twisted like a plait.) 
Reports of a shippable lake where there is now the rann hint to the end of mining activities at least 2000 years ago. The intake of sweet water of the area in the past could have been considerably higher, filling the ground, while at the same time the flowing off stopped or was reduced. 
I cannot see how the sea enters the area or how it shall be possible that it is lifted up as a whole. As little I cannot imagine mangrove forests in the interior.
There could be a historical link to the so-called Indus valley culture, a so-called outpost of which was determined at Lothal, which is near today's Khambat near Ahmedabad in Gujarat.  A connection to Kalibangan can be assumed, too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.115.115.88 (talk) 21:51, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  history of the rann 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Great Rann of Kutch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090114034106/http://cities.expressindia.com:80/fullstory.php?newsid=253114 to http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=253114
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110129003324/http://www.cicmanipur.nic.in:80/html/hr_c_syll_enggen.asp to http://cicmanipur.nic.in/html/hr_c_syll_enggen.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090410164431/http://www.education.nic.in/cd50years/q/6J/B3/6JB30202.htm to http://www.education.nic.in/cd50years/q/6J/B3/6JB30202.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:47, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Great Rann of Kutch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.cisce.org/data/Syllabus%20for%20ISC%202011/ISC%20Appendix%20-%20I%20-%20List%20of%20Prescribed%20Text%20Books.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Great Rann of Kutch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101212123416/http://gujarattourism.com/downloads/nov_2008.pdf to http://www.gujarattourism.com/downloads/nov_2008.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120118073306/http://www.gujarattourism.com/showpage.aspx?contentid=511 to http://www.gujarattourism.com/showpage.aspx?contentid=511
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120109012437/http://www.gujarattourism.com/showpage.aspx?contentid=1668&lang=English to http://www.gujarattourism.com/showpage.aspx?contentid=1668&lang=English
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131202222431/http://learnhub.com/lesson/8204-love-across-the-salt-desert to http://learnhub.com/lesson/8204-love-across-the-salt-desert
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131202231316/http://learnhub.com/lesson/8205-love-across-the-salt-desert-know-more to http://learnhub.com/lesson/8205-love-across-the-salt-desert-know-more
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120118073306/http://www.gujarattourism.com/showpage.aspx?contentid=511 to http://www.gujarattourism.com/showpage.aspx?contentid=511
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:58, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Great Rann of Kutch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721162346/http://www.portal.gsi.gov.in/portal/page?_pageid=127,693641&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL to http://www.portal.gsi.gov.in/portal/page?_pageid=127,693641&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:39, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: The Rann of Kutch has been added to the List of territorial disputes as an active dispute by  and the same has been mentioned in the lead of Rann of Kutch. Can you look into this. It is clear that the dispute is limited to Sir Creek (which is already on the list) not the Rann of Kutch which was settled way back in 1968 by an international tribunal, as mentioned in the source (Globalsecurity.org) cited by the user themselves. 
Globalsecurity is talking about the 1965 war, when talking about the Kutch dispute, and not the disputes now (including the "Kanjarkot fort" which has been mentioned by the user in their edit summaries), even they make it clear in the later part of their article that the dispute is now limited to Sir Creek. And the "new maps" by the Government of Pakistan only mention and display Sir Creek as disputed. These seem to be clear egregious WP:OR edits with a poor or deliberate misunderstanding of the sources cited. Gotitbro (talk) 04:53, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to mention that the former dispute and its settlement are already mentioned in this article, Great Rann of Kutch (whose Talk page I was redirected for some reason). Gotitbro (talk) 05:09, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, it was settled by arbitration. It is not a dispute any more. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:44, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I will be reverting your edits per the above discussion and explanation unless you have something significant to add here. Gotitbro (talk) 06:05, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Territorial dispute?