lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Turing tarpit

message: G'day,
I removed the stub tag  because this article seemed quite sufficient and informative for such a specific topic. I'm a layperson (a pharmacist -- no mathematician!) and I think it's important to remember that all of Wikipedia should be accessible to the layperson. If there's more important info then please add it (editors) but this seems complete as is. ben 17:51, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good call. A lot of articles labeled as stubs shouldn't be, and this was a clear-cut case. —Keenan Pepper 18:32, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer a stub 

message: Why is Haskell included in "see also" If there is some reason for it to be here it should be specified in the article. Haskell neither strikes me as a Turing Tarpit nor the opposite.  174.7.99.85 (talk) 03:22, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haskell 

message: This doesn't seem desirable.  A Turing tarpit is only one type of esoteric language, and shouldn't be shoehorned into the general article. -R. S. Shaw 03:50, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: proposed [[Esoteric programming language]] merge

message: Move the article or change the lead. Bye, Shinobu 06:05, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tarpit or tar pit 

message: I would like to propose the PHP framework Symfony as a great example of a Turing tarpit.  How do I go about creating a case for this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.237.62.254 (talk) 16:06, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symfony 

message: It would be nice to see that link somewhere useful.
96.236.201.154 (talk) 02:33, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Like printing "hello world". Or reading two numbers from input and printing their sum. Try either in Brainfuck and you will understand. -- DevSolar2 (talk) 13:33, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does "common tasks" mean
Talk:Acumen Nation

message: I vote for removal of the recently added link.  It is horribly out-of-date.  Sovex 17:53, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: I'm changing the "Acumen Nation was an..." to "Acumen Nation is an...". There has been no indication either way that the band was calling it quits, and they have been playing shows as recently as last month. Things are still up in the air, given the death of a key member, but the text of the article should remain "is" and not "was" until someone can provide a citation showing that the band has officially broken up. Since this has not happened, this citation does not exist (yet).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.232.5.178 (talk) 17:26, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: was/is
Talk:Sharpen Your Teeth

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 17:54, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: <^>v|This album is connected|v<^>
Talk:Colton Crossing

message: a stub for now. needs expansion of land use and natural features in the area and an area setting plus refs to move up to "start class". Anlace 00:01, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment per proj california

message: http://www.sbsun.com/general-news/20130827/new-rail-overpass-in-colton-finished-ahead-of-schedule-below-cost  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.115.250.17 (talk) 21:35, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Completion of flyover 
Talk:Psathyrellaceae

message: I just merged this article with much of the material from "Coprinus", as well as the articles "Coprinopsis" and "Coprinopsis cinareus". This was done to reflect current taxonomic understanding of the genera Coprinus (which is now restricted to Coprinus comatus and its close relatives), Coprinellus, Coprinopsis, and Parasola. I'm basing this merge on established scientific consensus and will post the proper references soon. Several of these genera and species may very well justify having their own articles, however, I merged everything until there is enough material on these species or genera to justify their own breakout articles. I ask that my rewrites and merges not be blindly reverted.
Also, in my opinion, the listing of Coprinellus disseminatus and Coprinopsis picacea as notable species is questionable – I suspect these were merely listed so that there would be an excuse to post images of them. Peter G Werner 18:06, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite and merges
Talk:Sheila Gallagher

message: I met Sheila last week, initially as a colourful photographic subject and later in a brief conversation I learnt that she is moderately famous within the City. I must confess that in this and another brief talk the following day, she completely stole my heart. --Jumbo 18:13, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What has this got to do with the article? Btline (talk) 14:54, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Met Sheila

message: Hmmmmmm - is a lolipop lady "notable" enough? To be on Wikipedia? Btline (talk) 14:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: She's got an MBE... Seems pretty notable to me. 78.149.129.123 (talk) 16:20, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?
Talk:Tronichord

message: I don't really think this is a stub anymore. It's still short, but really, how much is there to say? If anyone wants to delete the stub tag, go for it. Solarbird (talk) 06:41, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  no longer a stub? 

message: Revision 19:06, 15 January 2016<200e> 75.174.198.52 talk<200e>  3,500 bytes +158<200e>  →<200e>Tronichord Players added:
*Detroit troubadours, Mega Powers performed Pink Floyd's entire album Dark Side of the Moon on a Tronichord for their album Third Man from the Sun.
Revision 01:58, 14 March 2018‎ 2601:406:4001:98c7:bde3:73fc:24d1:1d07 talk‎  3,511 bytes +14‎  →‎Tronichord players updated it to:
*Country troubadour Ron Elsensohn performed Pink Floyd's entire album Dark Side of the Moon on a Tronichord on his album Cruci Fried. 
Neither reference is attributed and a web search fails to turn up any relevant hits.
72.173.126.165 (talk) 17:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing vandalism in Tronichord Players
Talk:Ilia

message: Firstly, this should be merged into Elijah. Secondly the "The Endtime Ilia" section seems 100% pure WP:OR, not to mention WP:POV. -- Avi 18:15, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added the external link Wikipedia articles with Ilia in the title on Google because there is at least a dozen and probably four dozen biographical articles on people with Ilia in their name. It would be too cumbersome to list them all here (and maintain said list), it doesn't seem deserving for a category, and if people type "Ilia" into the search box we don't want them to have trouble finding articles not listed on the disambig page. If anyone has a better solution, be bold. BigNate37T·C 23:47, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good job, BigNate! -- Avi 00:11, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

text: You are right, actually the romanian version is Ilie. --Roksanna 20:00, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia articles on people named Ilia
Talk:Blind Willow, Sleeping Woman

message: Does anyone know the original title of "Crabs"?  Looking through a bibliography of Murakami's I've identified all of the other stories that appear in BWSW but I don't see a short story that would correspond with "Crabs".  I haven't read it, but I understand that 野球場 has something to do with crabs, maybe that's it?  I live in the US and BWSW hasn't been released here yet so I have no basis for comparison. CES 18:18, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, and good work on this article!  I had been looking around for the table of contents to BWSW and this was the only place I could find it.  CES 19:30, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Crabs

message: This is a horrible article. It is borderline for deletion/merging debate. I wouldn't even call it an article. It is a poorly written big list. --GoOdCoNtEnT 07:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Article

message: Firefly is not an extract from Norwegian wood, it's a standalone story that was used as a study for Norwegian wood. I'll try to find more info and include it, if no one else does that first. TomorrowTime 21:01, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Norwegian Wood was written in 1987 whereas Firefly was published in 1983.  Some of Murakami's long stories are written based on his own short story and Norwegian Wood is one of them. NKEISK (talk) 11:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Firefly
Talk:East–West Shrine Bowl

message: The East-West Shrine game was first played in 1925, not in 1926 as was previously stated here.  I happen to have a 1925 game program, and the game's official website also states that it's been played since that year.  I've corrected the information.Bricology 23:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First game

message: Suggest that the section on Canadian Players be moved lower in the listing - at least to after the the section on game history - it is an interesting, but relatively minor aspect of the game.  Also, note that some of the text in the section on Canadian players is repeated almost verbatim from the introductory section. Suggest that this repetition be cleaned up by shortening its appearance in one place or the other.
Cigar95 (talk) 19:40, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Have a go at it. DoubleBlue (talk) 19:44, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Canadian players section
Talk:ReliaQuest Bowl

message: Yes, due to NCAA punishments, several years' worth of Penn State victories were vacated. However, they did play in the Outback Bowl several times over that period, and those scores should be listed in this article, even if the win no longer counts towards the school's official tally. Listing "Vacated" as a participating team in the table of scores is inappropriate and confusing. --Zeng8r (talk) 04:14, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Penn State vacated wins
Talk:New Mexico Bowl

message: The New Mexico Bowl is in the future. Must have already taken place to be considered for Wikipedia.  Mattisse 00:43, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not true. The event is on the schedule, and there is a lot of verifiable information on it. —C.Fred (talk) 15:07, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's against the rules to write about an event that hasn't happened yet. 

message: I removed the entry "Many" from the "Sponsors" Infobox field as it refers to title sponsors (which you can see by looking at Sugar Bowl, New Orleans Bowl, etc.) Many bowls have various non-title sponsors, so this is nothing special. And since to my knowledge, the New Mexico Bowl has no title sponsor, I have said so. I recall reading somewhere at some time that the New Mexico Bureau of Tourism has some contract to keep the name "New Mexico Bowl", which could qualify as title sponsorship, but I couldn't find such an article anywhere so I am quite probably mistaken in thinking that. If anyone has also heard this and can find a source, please add it. Smartyllama (talk) 19:24, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sponsor
Talk:Famous Idaho Potato Bowl

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Oppose - Changing the sponsor does not change the name of the bowl game. See Holiday Bowl, Sun Bowl, Gator Bowl, etc. Dohn joe (talk) 19:56, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Is this a bowl game named by the Idaho Potato lobby or something? Should we be discussing how the heck a bowl game got named "Famous Idaho Potato"? Because a nonsporty type like myself is a bit bemused. I mean, I'd understand it being the "Idaho Potato" bowl. But the Famous Idaho Potato bowl? Like why isn't the Famous Duke's Mayo bowl? Pretty sure sugar is extremely well-known, too. Why aren't all the bowl games famous? Maybe the Poinsettia lobby is like, "Daaahhhling, we don't have to announce it. Everyone knoooooows we're synonymous with Christmas deco"? It's pretty funny. There must be a story somewhere. Valereee (talk) 03:46, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the heck's a "Famous Idaho Potato"?
Talk:Liberty Bowl

message: There should probably be mention of Terry Baker's 99-yard TD run in the 1962 Liberty Bowl-- it is the longest play from scrimmage in NCAA history, and is not physically possible to be broken, only tied, so it is a pretty important historical feat that occurred at this bowl game.128.193.163.234 (talk) 21:39, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

message: Remember Paul "Bear" Bryant, Alabama's legendary football coach?  He coached his last game at the 1982 Liberty Bowl.  At the time he was the most winning coach in the history of college football.  If I remember correctly, one of the streets near the stadium was renamed in his honor.  Shouldn't he get some kind of mention in this article?67.45.112.143 (talk) 16:09, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of Bear Bryant??? 
Talk:Texas Bowl

message: I propose that this page be merged with the Texas Bowl page, because in reality the Texas Bowl is a continuation of the former Houston Bowl. The stats for all the previous Houston Bowls are listed on the Texas Bowl page as well, so there really is no need for this page to exist as it is. --172.165.67.117 05:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Holiday Bowl

message: "However, after an investigation by the NCAA into illegal benefits given to Oklahoma players, that win was vacated"
should be removed.
Why doesn't this article list which school's teams played in each year's Holiday Bowl???  That seems more relevant than MVP's or broadcast teams.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.79.190.186 (talk) 21:17, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article should include a paragraph stating that the Holiday Bowl should not be confused with the Bowl game of the same name, played in the 1950s by college teams belonging to the NAIA.   The wikipedia page for the NAIA has such a statement saying their bowl game should not be confused with the Holiday Bowl of the NCAA.  Marc S.  206.192.35.125 (talk) 19:43, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: NAIA

message: There is absolutely no reason why Holiday Bowl broadcasters should be split from Holiday Bowl. That list is a stub that is only 3kb long. The main article is 19kb long, much of which is tables and lists, well within the limits of WP:SIZE. A single article is only 21kb long, which is permitted, so there is no reason why the article should be split. Reywas92Talk 17:48, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No reason to split 

message: The Bridgepoint Education logo is outdated.  It should be replaced with the new 2013 sponsor logo for National University.  I have the .gif of the new National University logo in my possession ready to go.  How should I proceed? Nuwebdev (talk) 18:11, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Sponsor Logo 
Talk:Hawaii Bowl

message: The game was cancelled because of a lack of team caused by COVID-19, not because of COVID-19 (yes I'm playing the "died with" vs. "died from" card here, but semantics are crucial), and thus I think the teams should still be listed, but with a footnote stating that the game was not played (or Hawaii being slashed out). ViperSnake151  Talk   04:36, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I think this is the right approach to presenting the situation. Aoi (青い) (talk) 04:48, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

text: Fair point. I had put the canceled language into the "Game results" table (to match the 2020 entry) as I was updating content; I just further updated it to still list the teams, while noting that the game has been canceled. Dmoore5556 (talk) 05:04, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  2021 cancellation
Talk:68 Ventures Bowl

message: Can someone please update the bowl logo? I tried to but it is not allowing me to. MABowl (talk) 17:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  68 Ventures Bowl Logo
Talk:Gator Bowl

message: There is absolutely no reason why Gator Bowl broadcasters should be split from Gator Bowl. That list is an ugly little stub that is only 3kb long. Gator Bowl is 35 kb long, much of which is tables and lists, well within the limits of WP:SIZE. In the edit summary here you are correct that there was never any consensus to split; it was split without any reason given here. A single article is only 37kb long, which is permitted. There is abolutely no reason to be split. Reywas92Talk 16:22, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's wait until a discussion commences.--Levineps (talk) 17:31, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split is unnecessary 

message: The article currently reads:
:In the early years of the bowl, from 1946–1952, it featured a team from the Southern Conference against an at-large opponent. Beginning with the 1953 game, it switched to generally featuring a Southeastern Conference (SEC) team against an at-large opponent.
As written, it appears to be showing a change starting in 1953, but there is no change at all--both before and after 1953 the game featured an SEC team against an at-large team.  Could someone who knows about this fix it? Unschool 04:30, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? Early Years Confusion. 

message: Near the top of the page "2017 Matchup" score is reversed. 
Mississippi State 31 Louisville 27
That's the correct score, which is stated correctly at the bottom of the table.
I was there. Hail State! Myboo127 (talk) 23:07, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  2017 score error
Talk:Pop-Tarts Bowl

message: The redirect Cheez-It Bowl (2020–present) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Dmoore5556 (talk) 06:42, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Cheez-It Bowl (2020–present)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Tennessee vs Iowa is advertised as the Cheez-It Bowl at this stadium fire 1 January 2024. Bluespapa (talk) 20:36, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2024 it's back to being called the Cheez-It Bowl
Talk:Citrus Bowl

message: There is nothing about how much money is paid out for the bowl. Anyone know how much it is? (Cardsplayer4life 22:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: $4.25M - source here.  I'll add to the article. AUTiger ʃ talk/work 00:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Payout

message: Any idea when/how this bowl dropped its segregationist policy?  Rklawton (talk) 05:48, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Racial segregation

message: There is absolutely no reason why Capital One Bowl broadcasters should be split from Capital One Bowl. That list is a stub that is only 3kb long. Gator Bowl is 31 kb long, much of which is tables and lists, well within the limits of WP:SIZE. A single article is only 34kb long, which is permitted, so there is no reason why the article should be split. Reywas92Talk 17:20, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No reason to split 

message: Big Ten, in context of the conference, must be written out as "Ten". It should never be stylized as Big 10.71.212.11.111 (talk) 07:08, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Style
Talk:Ahearn Field House

message: The article should be moved because the proper name is "Field House".  Kgwo1972 18:36, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: I note that the web page says "Ahearn Field House was erected in 1951....". It cannot therefore have been opened in 1950 as stated in the article (though it might have been "dedicated" in 1950).
I also note that the web page refers to "Nichols Hall" not "Nichols Gymnasium".
The infobox also suggests that "The Old Barn" is a nickname. Perhaps this should be mentioned in the article?
CaughtLBW (talk) 15:34, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have any references on it, but as a former student I can say that "Nichols Gymnasium" was what we called the building before it was gutted by fire because it was... well... a gym!  After the fire, the building was retrofitted for classroom use and became "Nichols Hall" -- fair enough?--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:21, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The page for Nichols Hall makes no mention of it ever being called "Nichols Gymnasium", so I guess that was a colloquial usage. In any case, I've done the obvious, which is to link to the Nichols Hall page. CaughtLBW (talk) 01:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Other disparities with the k-state web page
Talk:Wars of the Roses (disambiguation)

message: Deleted a line saying: "*War of the Roses (game), war game created by Avalon Hill". The game's actual name is Kingmaker and has an entry in Wikipedia.
:Doh.  I stand corrected. PerlKnitter 15:01, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Avalon Hill) 

message: The war of the roses should not come here. redirectedFOARP (talk) 10:26, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That's too little info about what FOARP did. I'll try and come back  to look into whether reversions is needed because of stubborn literalism in disregard of user's reasonable interests.--Jerzy•t 17:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

text: This is the diff they effected 2 minutes later; it converted The war of the roses from a Rdr targeted at Wars of the Roses (disambiguation) into one targeted at Wars of the Roses. You could argue that The War of the Roses reflects either the real name of the film The War of the Roses, or a mangling of the dynastic struggle's name, and that the change slightly penalizes the well informed and meticulous to accommodate the ignorant and/or slovenly. The dog i have in that fight is yapping, a good sign that i should limit myself to the "You're a good boy, good boy, arnchoo?" role on this.--Jerzy•t 03:30, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ("War" vs. "Wars" distinction) 

message: This:
: War of the Roses", a term used by sports writer Jim McLennan to describe the meeting between Major League Baseball pitchers Jorge de la Rosa (Colorado Rockies) and Rubby De La Rosa (Arizona Diamondbacks)
is an incredible longshot for ever being a Dab entry, and utterly unjustified at this time:
# The only kind of legitimate dab entry with two links is one where the blue one sucks and the red one is begging to be written so the blue one can be thrown away.
# The single blue link in a Dab entry has to point at an article where there is discussion of the relevant thing bearing as name the term being Dabbed. 
# There has to be reliable sourcing of the use of the term in the sense in question.
As to this specific case, our standards don't say everything that's obvious: If you're Mel Allen you're super-notable, and your private obsessive quirks have a decent chance of being notable. Let's find out first if this bush-league announcer Jim McLennan's himself (let alone his silly and quite possibly insulting distortion of their respective ancestors' names) even approaches worthiness of notice beyond his station's licensed coverage area.   Uh, did i mention i took the entry off the accompanying Dab page?--Jerzy•t 17:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Messrs. de la Rosa and De la Rosa