lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Stroma (tissue)

message: Stroma, as a tissue, must be viewed in a broader sense than now, which is strangely limitated to animal tissue. In histology stroma is used to refer to any surrounding and suporting connective tissue in an organ, not only in animals, so also in vegetal structures o mycological preparations. --Bestiasonica (talk) 23:31, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In order to assess my opinion is that this article must be rated at Stub / mid level. --Bestiasonica (talk) 23:35, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: MCB importance should be high; I am surprised at the lack and accuracy of content here.The fundamental definition of stroma given here as having a structural role and not contributing to the function of an organ is extremely out of date, and entirely incorrect. For example, lymph node stroma has an important role in antigen presentation within the B cell follicular regions, and stromal remodelling following vaccination or infection is highly important for effective immune function. Stromal cell biology is a large field, from organogenesis/embryology to stem cell/regenerative medicine and stromal cell immunology. This article would be better if reduced to its first sentence, no facetiousness intended. 143.167.166.41 (talk) 01:08, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccurate content

message: Cancer related articles mention stroma but don't explain it. Should it be a section in this article ? or in tumor/neoplasm ? Could use The role of tumor stroma in cancer progression and prognosis: emphasis on carcinoma-associated fibroblasts and non-small cell lung cancer. for detail ? eg it says "The tumor stroma basically consists of (1) the nonmalignant cells of the tumor such as carcinoma-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), specialized mesenchymal cell types distinctive to each tissue environment, innate and adaptive immune cells,13, 18 and vasculature with endothelial cells and pericytes19, 20 and (2) the extracellular matrix (ECM) consisting of structural proteins (collagen and elastin), specialized proteins (fibrilin, fibronectin, and elastin), and proteoglycans (Table 1).21" and "During early stages of tumor development and invasion, the basement membrane is degraded, and the activated stroma, containing fibroblasts, inflammatory infiltrates, and newly formed capillaries, comes into direct contact with the tumor cells"  We could confirm that the stroma is a component of the tumour, rather than a layer around a tumor ? - Rod57 (talk) 12:25, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need explanation of tumor stroma
Talk:Michael Stonebraker

message: Hello, I have a conflict of interest for this article because I am being paid by Paradigm4 to help them add information below.  I would like to add the paragraph below to the SciDB section and change the name of the section to SciDB and Paradigm4.  I understand that I am not supposed to edit articles where I have a COI, so I’m asking for someone to do it for me.
The DBMS is developed and maintained by Paradigm4, a Waltham, Massachusetts-based company  that Stonebraker cofounded with Marilyn Matz, who is the CEO.Cohen, Peter  “Paradigm4: The Next Big Thing in Data” Forbes. Feb. 7, 2014. Stonebraker serves as CTO.Darrow, Barb  “Boston is a database hub. Here are 5 startups to watch” Gigaom. March 2, 2012. 
SciDB was designed for big data, which is large volumes of diverse information crunched on thousands of nodes in distributed data centers.Clarke, Gavin “SciDB: Relational daddy answers Google, Hadoop, NoSQL”  It takes S matrices as inputs to analyze big data such as satellite data, geospatial data, and genomic data.
The DBMS is multidimensional and uses array-based scaling. It is also “write once, read many,” which means it allows bulk load rather than single load insert, provides parallel computation, is designed for automatic rather than manual administration; and works with R, Python, and Python.Bcooper87 (talk) 16:24, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Request  

message: He won the Turing award for 2014, the introduction saying he won it "in 2015" is confusingly worded - to me at least.
Use this source instead: http://amturing.acm.org/award_winners/stonebraker_1172121.cfm
It's the same used in the Turing award wiki page: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_Award#cite_note-43"  
K-stz (talk) 21:10, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turing Award 2014 "in 2015"
Talk:Stromule

message: The following paper published in Plant Cell shows no protein flow between plastids connected by stromules:
Https://academic.oup.com/plcell/article/24/4/1465/6102381
The same author(s) put out another article discussing potential flaws in previous experiments and reaffirming that stromules do not interconnect plastids:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00709-014-0666-4 Alyxice (talk) 11:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Protein flow between plastids
Talk:Bacteriochlorophyll

message: "Groups that contain bacteriochlorophyll conduct photosynthesis, but do not produce oxygen. " Well then what does it produce? Anything? --Dave1g 05:53, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What about chemical structures of all particular bacteriochlorophylls? They are needed in the article...
178.235.146.101 (talk) 17:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The Chembox now has my drawing of bacteriochlorophyll a and I have added a gallery of most of the others mentioned in the text from Wikipedia Commons, although some have minor drawing errors that expert chemists may notice. Michael D. Turnbull (talk) 14:11, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have redrawn all the structures to the same Wikipedia / ACS standard, correcting some minor errors. Michael D. Turnbull (talk) 15:25, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemical structures
Talk:Plastocyanin

message: There is no reference on the pKa of 4.4. Here is a paper that disagreesA. G. Sykes, “Tilden Lecture. Structure and electron-transfer reactivity of the blue copper protein plastocyanin,” Chem. Soc. Rev., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 283–315, 1985.. It depends a lot on the organism, but none report a value of 4.4  Umolich (talk) 14:37, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  pKa?
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Margret Heater

message: Just looking at what the mirror had on about.com there were two cited sources in the article, granted as I have said time and time again, they could have been more, but it was not completely lacking in citations. Also I just noticed that they were signed to Fowl Records at one point in their career, another article I need to get back to working on, but nonetheless it was an established record lable, thus adding to the many notable facts about this band. Proving more and more to me, that the deletion was completely and utterly unthoroughly researched and uncalled for, again, please revert so I can continue to bring it up to proper standards. immunity 21:45, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post post follow up
Talk:Common descent/archive 2007

message: *Move - This article is primarily describing "universal common descent" and since there are beliefs that disregard "universal common descent" but accept "common descent" I feel the name should be changed. The only thing referring to common descent specifically is the definition at the beginning of the article, the rest of the article is about "universal common descent." Pbarnes 21:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Examples: The first sentence in the history section is referring to universal common descent specifically: "The first suggestion that all organisms may have had a common ancestor and diverged through random variation and natural selection..." The sections "universality and similarity" and "the argument from irrelevant differences" are all arguments for or against universal common descent not universal AND non-universal "common descent".  Pbarnes 21:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move Survey
Talk:Photoinhibition

message: I've nominated this for a GA assessment as it looks to be fairly complete and it would be good to have some pointers as to how it could be improved. I haven't edited it much but it was written by a researcher in the field and so should hopefully be pretty complete. I don't think there is a problem with it, but they did include their own paper, saying it was the most recent proposed mechanism for photoinhibition so reviewers may want to consider whether this is neutral or not. Smartse (talk) 14:56, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Didn't go read the GA criteria, but glanced over the article a bit and the main thing I noticed is the need for a longer WP:LEAD which among other things explains more about what the significance of all this is (does it explain why some plants grow better in the shade, etc). Kingdon (talk) 02:53, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the need for a more comprehensive lead.  I think that photoinhibition doesn't affect the rate of photosynthesis under normal, natural conditions because the damage is constantly being repaired. So the effect on plant physiology, ecology, etc. is likely not very significant. Though maybe that should be said (with a source, of course). Diderot's dreams (talk) 04:37, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

text: That was presumpous of me.  Photoinhibition certainly does affect physiology, ecology, etc. and this needs examination in the article.  Here's one source talking about at leaset one aspect of that.  Diderot's dreams (talk) 11:36, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

text: As for the way the author of the article presented their own work in the history section, I, too, think this isn't a biased or unfair way to present it.  The way all the theories are summed up, "there have been x theories, the most recent is this theory" is a reasonable way to word it as the latest idea probably should be most prominently mentioned in the history.  All the theories are discussed elsewhere.  If they weren't, then I'd have a problem with it.  Diderot's dreams (talk) 05:01, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA nomination
Talk:Start codon

message: "Interestingly when an alternative start codon is used, it gets translated as methionine - even if the codon might normally encode a different amino acid. This is because a separate [tRNA] is used for initiation."?--ScottieB (talk) 18:24, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference?

message: I'm seeing far too many small articles like this - surely it would be better to keep this in Genetic code#Start/stop codons. Half the article is just explaining background, which is duplicating material already elsewhere, and the rest is hardly enough for a stand-alone article. It certainly isn't so big as to clog up the genetic code article, and there are no other relevant parent topics that would support the existence of a separate article. Richard001 04:38, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, its not a standalone concept or topic unlike the other things in the translation template box 129.31.72.52 18:39, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed as well. How do you get that going?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by LostLucidity (talk • contribs) 00:03, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: This should actually be ATG. You are stating TAC which is the reverse complement. Consider if you have ATG (which truly starts an open reading frame) and then you have it's reverse complement TAC. The polymerase only uses TAC as the template for reading the code, however, the "coding" or "sense" strand is actually the ATG strand. You may confuse people by putting TAC. Hence I changed all the anti-sense strands to the sense strands which is more acurate.
Biochemr2 (talk) 10:34, 3 September 2009 (EDT)
This change actually confused me a lot.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.89.80.154 (talk) 19:24, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: TAC

message: It is true that different organisms, even eukaryotes, may use slightly different start codons.
The article mentions that Candida albicans uses CAG. If I understood the article then this will also be Methionin. I do not necessarily doubt this, but could more references be added to reinforce that statement? To me this part was new. I knew before that different starting codons are used, but I was unaware that they all will become methionin anyway. 2A02:8388:1641:8380:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F (talk) 18:47, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative start codons 

message: It occurs with a certain encoding gene and/or special tRNA. CutePikachu08 (talk) 16:09, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  In special cases the Amber and Opal STOP codons can encode for amino acids, Pyrrolysine and Selenocystein respectively.
Talk:List of Australian television ratings for 1999

message: the grand final is listed twice, once at number 6, and the other at number 14. please fix this up. The game was played between Melbourne and St George Illawarra. 210.50.133.48 23:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: nrl grand final

message: Would it be possible to expand this list with the details like the preceding ratings lists had? This is just the network share table and most watched broadcasts (which is pretty much just Friends).
Could we have the Highest Rating Programmes and the Top Rating Regular Programmes? This would help very much as I am using this data to add more real-world data and ratings data to Australian television programme articles.
It would also be very handy is we could establish uniformity over the rating pages, maybe have each with the same sets of data (and maybe same spelling (stick to either program or programme)).
Thanks, Daniel99091 (talk) 03:34, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion???
Talk:Hoogsteen base pair

message: There is a "In this manner" just in the beginning that really doesn't refer to anything.  Now if someone could put the manner before that statement I would be happy.  Otherwise, maybe it should be changed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.113.201.101 (talk) 03:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mullinavat

message: Loads of information, but now its like a big text book. who is actually gonna trawl through it all. It needs to be condensed a bit. And some photos pics and maps and diagrams to break it up a bit. Bilwalsh  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilwalsh (talk • contribs) 01:57, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: make it look nice

message: A good amount of info on here, but it'll need some work as too much looks like blatant copyvio.  --BrokenSphere 23:25, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: WP:DATE says: "Wikipedia has articles on days of the year, years, decades, centuries and millennia. Link to one of these pages only if it is likely to deepen readers' understanding of a topic." Linking to every single year in the article is not consistent with this, and just adds unnecessarily to the clutter of the article. If you disagree with the Wikipedia Manual of Style, you can take up the issue at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers). Ground Zero | t 03:57, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date linking

message: I'm not sure when the ringlink reference came in, but I'd be interested in any further info including real life contact info as I can't find any other reference to it on the web! Muxxa (talk) 20:42, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ringlink 

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* Write here
-7 not 7 in the west co ordinate . Clicking brings you to German at 7 east
83.147.141.53 (talk) 09:58, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 
Talk:Reading frame

message: According to Lewin's Genes XI, the reading frame should on the mRNA rather than on the DNA. the DNA needn't be divided into the triplets, because the molecule translated is the mRNA rather than DNA.And the enzyme just transcrips the DNA, not divide it. The dividing happens when the ribosome is reading the mRNA. --  パンツァー VI-II  ❂Fu7ラジオ❂In the Republic of China 103rd.民國103年 14:24, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 
Talk:Initiation factor

message: I completed a copyedit of this article. I made minor grammatical changes, as well as cross-referenced. I was able to verify references 3 and 4. I was only able to access the 3rd and 4th references, therefor I could not check the first two. -Jessica Mugfordjl (talk) 00:58, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Chromosomal inversion

message: The sentence "However, in individuals which are heterozygous for an inversion, there is an increased production of abnormal chromatids (this occurs when crossing-over occurs within the span of the inversion)." need some further clarification. A reference would also be great here. Jahibadkaret (talk) 11:46, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  I would like to see a list of common inversions as well, or a link to such a list.  Mathiastck (talk) 20:09, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some clarification needed 

message: Planned changes: Create sections, insert citations, talk about chromosomal inversion consequences. Cag1143 (talk) 19:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Advanced Ecology and Evolution
Talk:Dzmitry Rabchanka

message: Did some clean up and moving around of the article. Is in desperate need of references. --Ozgod 23:25, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: February 14, 2007
Talk:Melbourne Science Fiction Club

message: How to start.
Members of the MSFC were instrumental in organising and running three World Science Fiction Conventions.
Notable members/past-members of the MSFC include Lee Harding, Damien Broderick, and Martin James Ditmar ("Dick") Jenssen (after whom the Ditmar award was named).
The MSFC also houses a library of over 8,000 volumes and a huge collection of fanzines. It is listed as a special library (still seeking a resource for confirmation) for researchers.
Mfgreen 23:36, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability? 

message: Many of these would be in print format. What should be included?
203.56.94.28 (talk) 02:47, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third party reports =
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan/Evidence

message: I dont know if this means anything but I would appreciate if you didnt, "jump the list" on the evidence present page. Please move your evidence to the bottom of the list. It works like a queue. So if you came here after me, you will have to post your evidence below mine.
Thank you --Unre4Lﺍﹸﻧﺮﮮﺍﻝ UT 23:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, edit conflict.JFD 12:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  User:JFD - Your evidence

message: I am not planning to follow this RfA, but since I have been named for "Plotting with Bakaman to write a hate article on Pakistan Studies", I must say that I am indeed planning to write an article on Pakistan Studies, since being a compulsary part of the curriculum, it deserves an article. I have nothing to say about my "personal attacks" or speculation that the article I might write will be a "hate article". deeptrivia (talk) 02:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on [[Pakistan Studies]] 

message: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan/Workshop. You guys know you can use this to interact as well, to make proposals and such, and to discuss them, right? Blnguyen  (bananabucket) 00:30, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Workshop page
Talk:Thomastown, County Kilkenny

message: Very good article with a nice focus on the history and geography of the town. Anybody have info on the pubs, music, or social scene in the town? 213.202.177.17 (talk) 21:40, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article
Talk:Luciferin

message: This article needs to have citations, especially for the "Types..." section.  If anyone has time, please help, otherwise I'll get to it as soon as I can.--Bfesser 01:16, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Is luciferin a pigment? I think it PRODUCES light by means of a chemical reaction (even in darkness). A pigment doesn't produce light but REFLECTS some wave lenghts of light and absorbs others. The wave leghts it reflects produce in our eyes the perception of color. Am I wrong?--Miguelferig (talk) 18:03, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch.  Pigments absorb not emit light.  Luciferins may also be pigments, but this is incidental to their main function to emit light when oxidized.  Hence calling them pigments is misleading and confusing.  I have therefore changed the wiki link from biological pigment to heterocyclic compound, since it appears that all luciferins are heterocycles. Boghog (talk) 12:52, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Likewise it's in the category "Fluorescent dyes", which reinforces the common misconception that luminescence and fluorescence are the same phenomenon. Nanderson95 (talk) 02:50, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's true that these are all separate concepts that are easily confused. But it's also apparently true that luciferins have all three properties. I think that having them separately in a list helps distinguish them from each other (otherwise why would there be separate terms listed?). DMacks (talk) 03:00, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Pigment
Talk:Antonio Caggiano

message: As it stands, the article relies far too much on the opinions of Horacio Verbitsky who has deep ideological and sectarian reasons to be bias on this subject. Firstly, he was a member of the Montoneros, a far-left Peronist terrorist group which carried out various kidnappings, assassinations, bombings and killings during the 1970s (so of course he is going to be bias against the government trying to stop them doing this). Also, the subject of this article is a Catholic cleric, Mr. Verbitsky is Jewish, so may not be neutral on the Catholic Church. Torchist (talk) 16:33, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verbitsky , Verbitsky , Verbitsky
Talk:Slot 1

message: :Neither this nor the Slot A articles give a hint of why the traditional sockets were abandoned for a time. This would be a big plus to the articles(as I recall, sockets came back because the slots had their bandwidth maxed out). BioTube (talk) 20:03, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

message: "Some Pentium-II 450MHz processors, and all slot-1 Pentium-III's, came in the improved SECC2 variety."
This is not right. There are two very early versions of the Pentium III with 450 and 500 MHz using SECC. Their sSpec's are SL38E and SL38F as described in the Pentium III specififcation update, page 11 on ftp://download.intel.com/design/intarch/specupdt/24445355.pdf  Would someone please do the changes? For not being a native englisch speaker, I don't feel competent enougth to do it.--84.57.218.113 23:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pentium III and SECC