Talk:Sennacherib

message: Gabby Merger keeps changing the name of the Hebrew god referenced in the article from Yahweh to Jehovah. Can other editors please explain to the user that Yahweh is the form preferred by scholars, and that the article Yahweh is about the deity in keeping with the context of the link, whereas the article Jehovah is about the alternative name. Thanks.--Jeffro77 (talk) 05:52, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The god's name was YHWH. How that was pronounced is anyone's guess, but we can be sure it wasn't Jehovah. Yahweh is the convention among scholars. PiCo (talk) 11:52, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The section was heavily skewed towards a discussion of the bible instead of Sennacherib. It's now more focused, and the problem of the divine name has gone away (there's no reason to mention it at all).PiCo (talk) 12:35, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yahweh or Jehovah 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Sennacherib. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090313015906/http://www.biblestudymagazine.com/interactive/sennacherib/map.html to http://www.biblestudymagazine.com/interactive/sennacherib/map.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101009085208/http://www.sennacherib.net/ to http://www.sennacherib.net/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101117041758/http://www.isaiah666.com/sennacherib_campaign.pdf to http://isaiah666.com/sennacherib_campaign.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:46, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There are references in this section (numbered like this [9], [10], [11] etc.) that are plain text. I don't see the books or articles they refer to. Ideally, we resource them and enter them properly but in the meantime should they be removed? Seleucus123 (talk) 09:09, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing references 

message: Hi,
 
The below statements were identified by an AI as having minor POV issues. The aim is to detect weasel words and inflated/ambiguous language in the statements automatically to aid in article review. Please let us know inline if these below statements indeed have NPOV issues. Feel free to leave general comments on my talk page. Your valuable feedback will help us evaluate the AI and refine it for practical use. See the discussion on FAR for more information. Sumit (talk) 04:14, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't see how any of these passages have POV issues. Ichthyovenator (talk) 15:03, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement Quality Predictions 

message: As part of the FAC review, it was suggested that the note that explains Sennacherib's name in Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform (rather than the later Neo-Assyrian version) was to be removed on account of the source of the information being somewhat cryptic. I'm saving the note here on the talk page in case of future discussion:
Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform:  {d}SIN-PAP-MESH-SU in 
::Without special fonts installed, those show up as numbered boxes, anyway - a jpg or some other graphics format would be preferable.50.111.51.247 (talk) 02:36, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed note on name in Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform