Talk:Fabric (club)

message: What was the building before it was Fabric? Given that it's underground, massive and in Smithfield, i'd guess either a meat store or something to do with the Metropolitan Railway - a goods yard?
-- Tom Anderson 2007-04-07 22:45 +0100 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.56.79.121 (talk) 21:45, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was a meat packing warehouse. Source. -- ricmitch 14:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Building 

message: Are you sure about the capacity ?
this website say 1800: http://www.venues.org.uk/profile_page.asp?VenueID=4057
and that one, 2500: http://www.fluidfoundation.com/venuedetails.aspx?VenueID=657
--Roch Delsalle 01:59, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capacity 

message: and why is there a whole section about some unreferenced thingy called matter?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.100.150 (talk) 14:49, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  who the hell are Leslie and Reilly 

message: There is a reference to Ali B, which is a rapper famous in holland.
I doubt he is also the same a the resident of the fabric nights?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.204.81.73 (talk) 14:56, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ali B 

message: The single source article insufficiently justifies the argument that Fabric's closure was a government conspiracy. Description of Fabric's closure should document the deaths, review process, laws, and then in a 'controversy' section argue that this course of events is not accepted by parties, where details of allegations can follow.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 0veritas (talk • contribs) 21:02, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the tag after recent edits that addressed NPOV concerns. The article from The Independent can be regarded as a reliable source - you are entitled to your own opinion of course, but we don't write Wikipedia articles according to these. There is no question that this action by the local authorities has been highly controversial, e.g. considering that even the Mayor of London came out against it, and per the NPOV policy the article has to reflect that, whatever your own feelings are. Regards, HaeB (talk) 15:22, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

text: I am new to this, and respect the reliability of the Independent as much as anyone, but this article contained a large amount of bias, leading rhetorical questions and ambiguity. I have removed "Operation Lenor" from the section title because it is implied in the Independent article that this was the name of a police campaign, but the evidence given shows only that it was used for the undercover inspection described in the police form. Also, I don't appreciate your snarky remark about opinions, you've been around long enough to be able to deal with them I'm sure.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 0veritas (talk • contribs) 22:37, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV dispute Official closure ("Operation Lenor")

message: The capitalization used by the mark owner is irrelevant here. The Wikipedia Manual of Style is crystal clear that the name is to be rendered as "Fabric" and not as "fabric" for this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.33.145.32 (talk) 17:14, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization 

message: As the section 2 places above this one notes, the Independent article is completely one sided and unreliable.  The subheading of the article shows it - "Council documents suggest Fabric closure was a long term plan orchestrated by a hard-up council, with the police as pawns and drug legislation as a constant, convenient excuse." Completely unacceptable to use this article. First off, all these council documents show is that there were restrictions placed on the club a few years prior due to other drug related deaths. Apparently that's a dastardly "long term plan" to close the club. The hard-up council part is even worse, with no evidence whatsoever the Independent alleges the council wants to close the club because they're somehow not making money from it??? But they will if they turn it into a block of flats like what happened once to a club in Manchester??? Seriously, read this article guys, it's terrible. 2.102.184.35 (talk) 22:03, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The terrible Independent article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fabric (club). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161120074004/http://www.islingtontribune.com/saved-fabric-nightclub to http://www.islingtontribune.com/saved-fabric-nightclub
*Added  tag to http://www.croydonadvertiser.co.uk/exclusive-police-told-croydon-bar-change-music/story-28936140-detail/story.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:27, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified