lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Heat death paradox

message: I am unclear how this differs from Olbers' paradox.—RJH (talk) 20:31, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: One might consider a merge, but I'd like to see sources identifying the two first. Or any sources for this one. ;) Paradoctor (talk) 15:12, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The one source given lists paradoxes, but does not include Olber's paradox.  I suspect he just renamed it; i.e. it really is Olber's paradox. --Michael C. Price talk 23:42, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Olbers' paradox 

message: Where does this "paradox" come from? Especially, I'm interested in why the following is considered true: "Infinite size" <==> "Infinite age"
Also what kind of "size" are we talking about?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.129.111.203 (talk) 12:37, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a stub that needs references, so the statement can already be considered challenged. Re "size": Hm? The article talks of "infinite in extent". In GRT speak, that would be an "open" universe. Regards, Paradoctor (talk) 15:05, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

text: Agree. Only by the viewpoint of an infinite old and size universe could this be considered a paradox, but as our current understanding of the universe rejects either there's no contradiction in it as well it leads to the (not disproved) cosmological heat death hypothesis. Wcris (talk) 12:39, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: The author of this seems to jump to the conclusion that the universe must necessarily not be infinite in extent if it is not infinitely old. There is no reason provided as to how this logical leap was made, it seems as if the author simply assumes that it must follow as a consequence because he has a failure of imagination as to how the universe might be infinite in size and finite in age. He is personally incredulous as to how the universe could be infinite in extent if it was finite in size and so does not consider the possibility of it, much as how a creationist does not consider that evolution might be real because he cannot see how eyeballs could possibly evolve. Argument from personal incredulity. Tell me I'm wrong.
207.225.95.253 (talk) 14:54, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Argument from ignorance for finite extent of universe
Talk:Osage

message: In Canada, there's also an Osage. Maybe there're more Osages in America. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.117.192.163 (talk) 14:01, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Osages 

message: as stated — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.239.72.112 (talk) 18:10, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  no link to osage language
Talk:Thomas Preston (scientist)

message: In an earlier version of this article, a user had contributed a nice paragraph on the magnet that Preston used in his discovery of the anomalous Zeeman Effect. The photo looks legit, along with the information provided, as can be checked from Fig.6 of the following article: Unfulfilled renown: Thomas Preston (1860-1900) and the Anomalous Zeeman Effect I would suggest embedding this information and photo back into the article in some form, it is an interesting magnet; having such a device in 1890s made all the difference in being able to measure the line splitting.
: I removed that section because it was unsourced. If you have good sources, feel free to write about it. Kleuske (talk) 10:19, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Preston Magnet
Talk:Thorne–Hawking–Preskill bet

message: There's actually three different T-H-P bets: the old nakedness bet, the new nakedness bet and the info bet. All three of these should be noted here, but I'm not sure if it'd be best to do it in sections, or with a disambiguation page. --Cgranade 21:44, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three bets. 

message: I've removed the gallery from the article. Simply put, this only serves to show the three men involved in the bet, something which is already done on each person's article. Furthermore, it doesn't illustrate this article, which is the reason for illustrating an article to begin with. Just because we have free images doesn't mean we should use them "just because". EVula // talk // ☯ // 18:57, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: you could use photoshop maybe  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.230.72.81 (talk) 03:20, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed gallery 

message: I've not seen the context of the original quote but could he have been making a joke in line with the cricket ashes? This may be the case if it was made for an English audience esp seeing as though baseball is a rough equivalent to cricket. Just a thought. Tigerman2005 (talk) 10:42, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ashes comment 

message: Tonight's NOVA episode showed Kip Thorne holding and talking about the original document for the earlier bet, which he said was made in 1974. The document was handwritten by Thorne, signed by both men, stamped with both British and US postage, and finally bears Hawking's later fingerprint with the words "Conceded Stephen Hawking June 1990." The witness statement at the bottom of the document--which could only have been added at or after the time the bet was made--states "Witnessed this tenth day of December 1974". The witness signatures include one that is completely illegible, one that reads approximately "Anna Zythar", and one that is almost certainly Werner Israel's.
A low-quality scan of the same document can be seen online at http://www.star.le.ac.uk/~sav2/blackholes/xrays/Hawking_Thorne_wager.jpg .
So I'm inclined to change the year of the bet in this article and in the Cygnus X-1 article in spite of the fact that Hawking, much later, clearly said "we made the bet in 1975." Any objections? 98.247.224.9 (talk) 06:04, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  1974, not 1975
Talk:Viva Kerala FC

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 01:54, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Viva Kerala Football Club →  – Consistency with current naming conventions in :Category:Football clubs in India (also WP:PRECISE, WP:CONCISE). – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 14:10, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 December 2023
Talk:Vasco SC

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. per discussion consensus and title consistency. FYI to nominator, this should have been done as one single RM discussion, with all the titles listed. But it's easier to just go ahead and do the moves now. (non-admin closure) — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 10:41, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Vasco S.C. →  – Consistency with current naming conventions in :Category:Football clubs in India , :Category:Indian Super League teams and so on. Footwiks (talk) 06:47, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 11:32, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Many Indian Football Club article titles have FC or SC or AC, But Some Indian Football Club article titles have F.C. or S.C. or A.C. So In order to unify disordered article titles, I requested many title moves. What's wrong with that? Footwiks (talk) 15:02, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 August 2021
Talk:Time derivative

message: I dispute the sentence "Other shorthands include a subscripted t as in xt." While subscript notation can be used to refer to derivatives, I've never seen it used for a time derivative.  The reason is that the notation xt is discrete-time notation for the level (not change) of x at time t.
Unless someone objects, I will delete this sentence.  Please respond pro or con.  Duoduoduo (talk) 19:46, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notational dispute
Talk:Time stream

message: The content of this page / this article seems redundant with the content at Timestream and the two articles should be consolidated into one.  Pugetbill (talk) 23:37, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Forbes72 (talk) 20:48, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal - merge with Timestream
Talk:Hindustan Aeronautics Limited SC

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 21:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hindustan Aeronautics Limited S.C. →  – Consistency with current naming conventions in :Category:Football clubs in India , :Category:Indian Super League teams and so on. 14:55, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 11:31, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Many Indian Football Club article titles have FC or SC or AC, But Some Indian Football Club article titles have F.C. or S.C. or A.C. So In order to unify disordered article titles, I requested many title moves. What's wrong with that?
*Support for consistency. Nehme1499 20:53, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 August 2021
Talk:Churchill Brothers FC Goa

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 02:03, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Churchill Brothers S.C. →  – Per club logo, name on their official Facebook page and official Instagram page. Nehme1499 (talk) 18:43, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 16:53, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 January 2021 
Talk:Calcutta Cricket and Football Club

message: The heading says "Category:Defunct cricket grounds in India" but the article says cricket is played there. Which is it?
Also, women are not mentioned, but today women play field hockey and tennis and other sports. Do women play at this club, or is it still an all male club?--Dthomsen8 (talk) 00:28, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions of fact 

message: Hello,
In Calcutta_Cup#Calcutta_Club, it is said that the Calcutta Football Club was founded in 1873, and an internal link refers to this article.
Is this article's foundation date wrong or is the link in Calcutta Cup erroneous and should refer to another club?
Thank you, --Daehan (talk) 15:53, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops ok, these clubs were merged, sorry. --Daehan (talk) 15:55, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foundation date 
Talk:Bluebell wood

message: I heard a rumor that any wood carpeted with bluebells has been there for at least a millenium. That sounds like a very interesting fact if its true. Googling the only semi relevent comment I can find is that the Surrey woods have bluebells and have been there for at least a thousand years . If anyone can confirm this it'd be an interesting addition. --RickiRich 21:10, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A note

message: Hi. I question the worth of the "Notable bluebell woods" section, at least in its present form. The sole example in Haringey is minute, and unlikely to be notable compared with some of the really large and well-known examples. Why is it here, and why is the section here? Nomorenonotnever (talk) 16:59, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed: that section, including the "citation needed" tag has been there for over two years, with no additions. I've deleted it for the moment: if anybody feels like re-adding the info with a few other notable woods, they can always revert  Dom Kaos (talk) 19:42, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable bluebell woods - really notable?  

message: Perhaps something hi-resolution would be useful for this article.
Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:54, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Image Available 
Talk:Tunnel injection

message: Is this effect significantly different from field electron emission so as to merit its own article?  It seems to simply describe a name for field emission through a flash memory structure.  -- mattb @ 2007-03-25T23:22Z
Now that the field emission article has been revised, it will be easy to include this as a variant name for one of the applications mentioned, and to make this into a redirect page.  I'll get around to this in due course. (RGForbes (talk) 03:22, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Field emission
Talk:The Temptation of Saint Anthony (novel)

message: I suspect we may need better disambiguation on this. -- Antaeus Feldspar 21:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

message: ...book years ago and have never forgotten it. Read it and the images will stay in your mind forever.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.51.153.238 (talk) 02:39, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I read this... 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move (non-admin closure)  BegbertBiggs (talk) 15:00, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The Temptation of Saint Anthony (book) →  – I don't think this is particularly contentious, but this article has been moved twice and has been stable at the current title for 4 years. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:40, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 November 2020
Talk:Turbidometry

message: "small molecules with antimocrobial activity against E.coli and P. aeruginosa identified by high throughput screening"  R De La Fuenta et al,  British journal of pharmacology (2006)
Someone should probably also discuss its use in high-throughput screening. - Stranger
turbidometric assay-....  
strengths
*for cell growth studies turbidometric assays are superior to GFP based assays due to the poor correlation of the GFP signal to cell number - Fuente et al(2006)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.5.109.49 (talk) 03:39, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: an example of its use and a few other ideas
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Ginkgo100

message: Username	Ginkgo100
Total edits	3282
Distinct pages edited	1809
Average edits/page	1.814
First edit	01:40, 13 February 2006
	
(main)	1451
Talk	188
User	418
User talk	641
Image	25
Template	25
Category	2
Wikipedia	505
Wikipedia talk	27
Ginkgo100's edit summary stats as of 21:19, October 11 2006, using Interiot's tool. (aeropagitica) 21:20, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Persita Tangerang

message: If someone wants to have a logo with this article, they should transfer the current one from Commons to fair use here, as it is going to be deleted there. Oalexander (talk) 09:41, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Aldhi Kecut. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 22#Aldhi Kecut until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Aldhi Kecut" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:UK Dark Matter Collaboration

message: This now appears to be current (again), which means that this page, and the one for Boulby Mine, need to be updated, or at least have their tenses changed.
Sources
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/sep/07/particlephysics.darkmatter
http://www.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/ZEPLIN-III-Project/
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.88.140 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Mount Cardigan

message: User (now registered as NHguardian, previously referred to as Anonymous user (IPs 47.234.0.59 and 71.181.51.206)) continues to remove external link. No other contributors to this article have objected to inclusion of link.  Jrclark (talk) 00:41, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Due to an organization affiliation, user Lhhiker is proposing an additional external link for consideration. On the Mount Cardigan page, a third party referenced the Appalachian Mountain Club's Cardigan Lodge. Proposal is to add the link, as follows, for information about the lodge: http://www.outdoors.org/cardigan. --Lhhiker (talk) 17:51, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New external link
Talk:IRiver H100 series

message: ===Sources of information===
* What do you love about your H100 Series Player - MisticRiver forum thread
* H100 Series - MisticRiver Wiki
pabouk 09:22, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Preparations for future edit

message: * What do you love about your H100 Series Player - MisticRiver forum thread
* H100 Series - MisticRiver Wiki
pabouk 09:22, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources of information

message: I wanted to add the point that you can choose RockBox or the original OS when starting up, but I can't do this. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 12:44, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: no edit control for seciton about RockBox software
Talk:Persik Kediri

message: Note that the link to Christian Gonzalez is not linked to the right Christian Gonzalez Ludeking 10:35, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:524 East 72nd Street

message: I don't know who proposed the merge, but I have no objections to the merge. Either direction is fine; I don't mind which title gets the "main" article. --Aaron 21:24, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Technically, the official name is the Belaire Apartments. If the articles are merged, i will gladly add information to the new article.  RaccoonFox • Talk • Stalk 21:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

text: If we merge 524 over to Belaire, does the AfD go with it, or will it stop this AfD in its tracks? Like I said, I really don't mind which way the merger goes. --Aaron 21:32, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I don't think the AfD will go through. It's current news, so therefore, it's notable. It also has a major-league athlete as a casualty. if this doesn't qualify as major, what does?  RaccoonFox • Talk • Stalk 21:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

text: *Let me phrase that a little more directly; since I'm involved in the AfD to save this article, I don't think I should do the redirect. But if you, RaccoonFox, wish to merge this one over to Belaire, I'll have no objection at all. --Aaron 21:35, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with [[Belaire Condominiums]]
Talk:Persebaya Surabaya

message: persebaya harus menang melawan PSM Makasar hanya 5-0 saja jangan banyak banyak ok ok ok
dan kalahkan semua lawanmu 
putar lagi juara ISL seperti tahun 1996 dan 2004
green force mania 
maju membahu bersatu padu
----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.139.12.37 (talk) 08:08, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  adham maulana
Talk:PSMS Medan

message: he go to Persik Azmi1995 06:18, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Markus Horison]]
Talk:PSM Makassar

message: Indonesia 182.1.181.105 (talk) 13:19, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  PSM MAKASSAR
Talk:Deltras F.C.

message: The Wikipedia:Typo Team/moss spell checker has found a possible typo that a copyeditor needs help to resolve. If furiest is misspelled, it can just be corrected in this article. If furiest is a legitimate word, it should be added to the English Wiktionary (which defines words in all languages) with a definition at wikt:furiest. Feel free to leave a note in this section if you do one of those things, or if you can provide any hints about this word. Thanks! Schazjmd (talk) 19:22, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Is furiest a typo or a real word?
Talk:Gresik United F.C.

message: This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because this football club actually exists in Gresik, Indonesia. and The Mark of the Beast looks like just enjoy to interfere for me. — Dj nix (talk) 06:55, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, speedy removed, this club appears to play in the Indonesia Super League which is a Fully professional league which according to WP:NSPORTS confers notability for players, therefore it must at least have a claim of notability for the clubs in which those players play.--ClubOranjeT 07:38, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:Magic in the Fire Emblem series

message: I edited some stuff, but I want to explain a few things about the edits. In the Fire Emblem 7 heading, I removed the remark that the magic system modifications were noteable; the only spells included to balance the magic repetoire were the three new S rank spells and shine. I think I can reasonably say that the S rank spells don't do much to balance the game...and shine is my favorite general use light spell, but is it alone worth mentioning? If we do note such minor changes, we'd also be obliged to list the many more important minor changes between games, as well as list spell names for every game. This is not an option - Wikipedia is not a game guide, and doesn't need to include such trivial changes between games. Similarly, the changing of luna in Sacred stones is insignificant. The "introduction" of mages using multiple schools of magic is back in FE4, with the introduction of the RPS triangle itself (a multitude of characters could use both "anima" magics and dark or light magic), so that sentence was corrected.
I'm thinking we might want to get rid of the information on specifics of magic statistics in the FE6 heading, since we don't include the differences present in FE4/5 or 9. And these are definitely more minor gameplay differences. However, for now I just changed wording and added a little more detail.--Mr Bucket 21:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Explaining Myself

message: did you steal them from the net or make them because like i know people who got em form the net reply tokrakcrook 09:13, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I downloaded them from a FE fan site, I don't remember which it was but if I find it I will credit them Guess who i am 08:12, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm just removing them because 1) they have no source (so far) and 2) they contribute nothing to the article except maybe decoration. Axem Titanium 22:15, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: excuse me
Talk:Mount Lincoln (New Hampshire)

message: I undid a recent edit which provided a citation to the effect that the mountain was named for Abraham Lincoln. I'm not sure I trust the info, even though it was from a federal government publication. My edit summary was slightly incorrect — the mountain is in the town of Franconia, not Lincoln (which is about one mile to the south) — but the fact that the nearby town was named "Lincoln" well before the Lincoln presidency, and the fact that there is a Lincoln Brook coming off the mountain and flowing into the town, makes me doubt the accuracy of the published info. The fact that it is simply one name in a long list doesn't help, either. I hope there is a source with a fuller description of the mountain's name origin somewhere. --Ken Gallager (talk) 12:19, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of name