lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:William II, Prince of Orange

message: Did William have a title prior to becoming the Prince of Orange? Theroyalhistorian (talk) 02:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  William's Title 

message: It says he's Willem with an E instead of IA  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.20.194.233 (talk) 03:35, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  William's portrait
Talk:Hassan Mohamed Hassan

message: Hassan is my Granpa. All suggestions are welcome on this page. Thanks. --DesertMoh 01:55, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:William Jaggard

message: I'm wondering why it is being assumed that Hemings and Condell were responsible for the choice of Jaggard as the publisher of the folio project. The existence of the syndicate indicates, on the contrary, that Jaggard spearheaded the project because he had access to the requisite rights in copy. Alternatively, the entry should also consider the possible role of Lord Chamberlain Pembroke in encouraging the enterprise.
Is there any evidence that Pembroke had a role in encouraging the First Folio? This seems wholly speculative. As for Jaggard's or the syndicate's role in spearheading the First Folio, here again the evidence seems lacking. Ugajin 04:53, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hemings and Condell 

message: Further to the point above, doesn't Isaac's name, along with Blount's, on the title page First Folio more or less settle the matter of which Jaggard, father or son, led the printing process?--Jbnisenson (talk) 14:16, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jaggard Sr's role in First Folio
Talk:Lowercase people

message: Per Wikipedia's style guide concerning non-capitalised trademarks, I've changed the style convention of this article to normal English capitalisation. Please see Adidas for a comparable article (and about a company far more notable than Lowercase people records). Joshua (talk) 23:54, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Style

message: "Please keep this article. TWLOHA is a great organization, and I've spoken to the founder face-to-face only a few months ago. They are an amazing group of people with an excellent cause.
Notability isn't a problem, they are notable, they just have not been around long enough for much new information to be added. Renee, the young woman who the organization was started for, has successfully been treated for cocaine addictions and depression. Her life has taken a 180 turn because of this group, and if that isn't notable, I don't know what is.
Please do not delete this article. Any further questions can be directed to this page or straight to my talk page. I'll do the best I can to defend this organization. Streetsabre 05:40, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Please keep this article

message: It's been confirmed by the band. don't delete that section please. thanks!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.4.93.215 (talk) 19:33, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lowercase People Records
Talk:William Lenthall

message: The article gives his date of death as 9 November 1662, but Britannica and the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography both say 3 September 1662.
Dataguru64 (talk) 20:38, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Death 

message: William Lenthall was the subject of the unfinished ghost story "Speaker Lenthall's Tomb" by M. R. James. It perhaps isn't enough for a section on its own, but if Lenthall is included in any other works of fiction, then they could be included in a new section. --xensyriaT 00:02, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speaker Lenthall's Tomb
Talk:William Lilly

message: The mysterious tag that got slapped on this article stating that the contents of this biography (!) did not reflect all "significant VIEWPOINTS" is comical!  What facets of the life of a 17th century English occultist and astrologer insults your sense of fair play?  Are there crucial facts about this man's life that are not being included?  Well, if so, why didn't you use your precious time to *include* them, rather than to put a tag on the article?  Is it possible that you can't even imagine what information has been excluded?  I'm going to remove this silly tag and request instead that if you have something to say, you come out and say it -- in the article, preferably.  This is an expanded blurb which needs more scholarship -- for sure! -- but hardly some sort of manifesto.  NaySay (talk) 14:18, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've made a start on adding references to the text and developing the content, so have moved the 'references-needed' tag to where it applies.Tento2 (talk) 13:05, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Developing content
Talk:Combat America

message: At the time this was filmed, Prince Henry was Duke of Gloucester. He was Duke from 1928-1974, when the Dukedom was assumed by his son, Prince Richard, upon Prince Henry's passing. 2603:6000:CA01:7000:E8C4:4247:DCD:7889 (talk) 22:03, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combat America
Talk:William Lockhart of Lee

message: I'm not sure that changing to Lanarkshire (Parliament of Scotland Constituency) really helps much. In 1654-1658 (the relevant timeframe) there was no Parliament of Scotland. Lockhart was elected to the Parliament of the Protectorate (i.e. England, Scotland and Ireland) - see First, Second and Third Protectorate Parliaments.
Macquants (talk) 19:25, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parliament of Scotland
Talk:William Monson, 1st Viscount Monson

message: I have deleted and recreated this article as a stub.
This is because Wikipedia Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License allows commercial distribution, but the current licence used by the British Civil War website is Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which places a restriction "Non-Commercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes." which the Wikipedia license does not.
Providing the requirements of the Terms of Use and WP:plagiarism are met there is no reason why information from the British Civil War website can not be summarised and and cited like any other copyright text. But it can not be copied under its copyleft licence into Wikipedia articles because its licence is more restrictive than the Wikipedia licence. --PBS (talk) 13:53, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyleft problems
Talk:William Noy

message: He was apparently known by the anagram I moyl in law.  I cannot cite the authority for this.  --MWLittleGuy (talk) 20:25, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anagrammatic abuse 

message: I wish I had acceptable citations, however I don't think they existed for anyone in Noy's day, way back when, yet I am fairly certain the stones that did him in, were gall. And a miserable late life indeed, stones can make a man know he lived in hell, I did, and am most thankful that to day's life can be lived in heaven. -Dirtclustit (talk) 07:07, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stones 

message: Theres alot more info on Noy at https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Noye,_William_(DNB00). If someone has the time to add it? Talskiddy (talk) 09:33, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki source info
Talk:Daffy – The Commando

message: If anybody needs evidence of the Wehrmacht (apparently) pin-up girl mentioned in the article, here she is. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  00:17, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poster in the Background 

message: "When Von Vultur opens the curtain, Daffy makes an ugly face similar to the stereotypical Japanese faces used in cartoons at the time (see, for example, Bugs Bunny Nips the Nips), causing Von Vultur to run off frightened."
This is not correct, nor is it cited from any reliable source. Daffy Duck is using a variation of the pejorative English gesture known as "cocking a snook", it is not in any way a call-back to racial stereotypes in concurrent culture or wartime propaganda. Neither does it resemble the faces 'pulled' by Bugs Bunny in 'Nip the Nips'.
This article is inaccurate, unsupported, and should be corrected or removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:189:8201:B000:10:ED37:329D:F2DA (talk) 04:49, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stereotypical Japanese Face
Talk:William Sacheverell

message: I'm getting confused here.  William Sacheverell was the son of Henry Sacheverell, yet Henry was born in 1674 as the "son of Joshua Sacheverell"!  Weren't William and Joshua brothers?  And is their father the other Henry Sacheverell?  I need to know, okay? --Angeldeb82 (talk) 15:13, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't get it 

message: It seems he was also Governor of the Isle of Man for a while, ca. 1688, unless that's another William Sacheverell. Source:
:
 — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  11:56, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like a son - see An Account of the Isle of Man, pages viii to x. Sworn Deputy Governor on 9 May 1692, 8 June 1693 took oaths as Governor. DuncanHill (talk) 14:08, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Governor of the Isle of Man?
Talk:William Scroggs

message: Might it not be time to solve the neutrality issue?
Chrisdoyleorwell (talk) 20:01, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the Neutrality issue? Rjm at sleepers (talk) 07:32, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  As far as I can see, the chap who added the neutrality tag didn't give any reasons. Some changes were made later that year addressing bias. I suggest that if no-one objects, the tag can be removed. Rjm at sleepers (talk) 07:39, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

text: No objection after seven days, so I'm removing it. Rjm at sleepers (talk) 06:01, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality
Talk:William St Leger

message: In June 2022 this article has been very much improved by a spurt of very valuable additions and corrections by the eminent Wikipedian User:Robinvp11 who brought in is indiscutable expertise in military history and many other matters (he has a degree in History and Politics). However, he also changed the layout of this essentially biographical article from a succession of 7 sections leading from "Birth and origins" to "Irish wars and Death" to a new structure consisting of sections "Personal details" and "Career", with subsections "The Netherlands" and "Ireland 1627 to 1642" under "Career". This has the advantage of giving some depth to the previously flat structure. However, I would feel that a "from birth to death" structure is prescribed by MOS:CHRONOLOGICAL, which states "In general, present a biography in chronological order, from birth to death". I was tempted to boldly re-establish the previous layout but not being a very experienced editor and lacking academic background, I thought I should consult and see what more experienced and knowledgable Wikipedians have to say. With many thanks and best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 09:50, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The article still follows a clear chronological order, I've just simplified the section heads, while putting "Personal details" first ties into the Infobox layout and follows a convention widely used elsewhere in Wikipedia. I'm not sure what the problem is. Robinvp11 (talk) 10:58, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section layout: from birth to death?
Talk:Primrose path

message: Leading someone down the "Primrose Path" is similar to "being lead down the garden path" the latter probably being a bastardization of the original Shakespeare quote. Being lead down the garden path more suggesting a person was deliberately deceived or gulled. 
Primrose Path...
"A course of action that seems easy and appropriate but designed to end in calamity." Such as in a court of law when a witness is cleverly cross examined - putting them at ease, then turning evidence about proving a contradiction, leading to calamity.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.121.186.28 (talk) 12:12, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think the definition is wrong
Talk:William Wade (English politician)

message: Reading through the above article and more particularly the DNB article (currently being transcribed), I would disagree that this is a typical politician/parliamentarian.  While he spent a small proportion of his public life in parliament, much of the remainder seems to be in more public service types role
** clerkship of the privy council
** envoy roles
** servant of the crown or the lead powers of the crown (eg. Walsingham)
billinghurst (talk) 04:01, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputing classification as '''English politician'''

message: Majority of references for the period refer to as William WAAD, with only occasional WADE.  I propose to rename to William Waad, and have a direct from William Wade.
-- billinghurst (talk) 17:24, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose to rename WAAD
Talk:William Walwyn

message: I have deleted this article and recreated it as a stub.
This is because Wikipedia Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License allows commercial distribution, but the current licence used by the British Civil War website is Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which places a restriction "Non-Commercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes." which the Wikipedia license does not.
Providing the requirements of the Terms of Use and WP:plagiarism are met there is no reason why information from the British Civil War website can not be summarised and and cited like any other copyright text. But it can not be copied under its copyleft licence into Wikipedia articles because its licence is more restrictive than the Wikipedia licence. -- PBS (talk) 13:07, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyleft problems
Talk:Winston Churchill (Cavalier)

message: Can anyone tell me why there is a redirect here??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by OLEF641 (talk • contribs) 05:40, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There are two redirects here. Are you referring to this one: Winston Churchill (1620-1688) or this one: Winston Churchill (died 1688)? --Dweller (talk) 05:58, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect???
Talk:Wu Sangui

message: This is the "popular" version. However it has been pointed out there could be many other reasons. 1) He was Ming and should crush the rebels. He only wanted Manchu help, not let Manchu take over. 2) His father had either been flogged or executed and head hanging outside of Beijing.
These could definately lead a man to fight those rebels. I think it is a quite unfair judgement of him put on by Ex-Ming scholars who branded him as a traitor.
I'd also like to ask for a historical source (not a historical fiction) citing his reason of collaboration with Dorgon is because his concubine was captured. It's not unreasonable to see that he collaborated with the Qing thinking that it would give him a position in the new dynasty. Big Wang (talk) 12:37, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  His Concubine 

message: Was it in 1678 as in this article, or was it on December 1673, as in the Featured Article, the Spanish version of Kangxi Emperor(es:Emperador Kangxi)? Avihu (talk) 20:53, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: he declared himself the emperor of a new Zhou Dynasty in 1678,  Hans yulun lai  (talk) 13:53, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  to Hans, the picture painting depicts Wu Sangui, not Kangxi, I know it confused me too has he had a Qing imperial dress on, first I thought he looked like Kangxi too,lol, it took me a while to figure it out when I look more closer to the face, Wu has broader jaw bone like that of a tiger :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.221.152.189 (talk) 14:31, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did he declared himself the emperor of a new Zhou Dynasty?
Talk:Cho Man-sik

message: The best source I have on his fate is here:
Note footnote 80. His ultimate fate is not documented. This reference makes it clear we cannot say for certain he was executed. Mindme (talk) 14:27, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a good point.  I appear to have picked up the date 15 October 1950 from the Korean article, and this article should probably be changed. In 2002, Lankov presumes Cho's death, and relates how this story came to the West. This recent story speaks of his execution in 1950, though it's not as definitive a source as either of the two books we've listed. Most commentators do seem to accept that he was executed during the Korean War. What do you suggest for this article? Something like "he was thought likely to have been executed", or something else? (I took the liberty of formatting the link in your post, hope you didn't mind; feel free to revert me.) Regards, — BillC  talk 20:51, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Bill. In the Koryo Hotel w/u I wrote "When United Nations forces threatened to overrun Pyongyang in October 1950, it is thought he was executed." with a ref to the google book view.  Mindme (talk) 14:40, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I saw that after writing my comment above. I'll adjust the text in this article accordingly. Best regards, — BillC  talk 17:11, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Execution
Talk:Jeff Grubb

message: Article is still a stub but notability should be established by extensive works by this author. Guild War references also help to reference. Please discuss here first before reverting notability.Stextc (talk) 04:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Extensive works by the author are primary sources; notability can only be established by citing content, context, analysis or critical development from reliable secondary sources. Please do not remove the Notability cleanup template until content supported by reliable secondary sources have been added. --Gavin Collins (talk) 11:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: * Interview with GamingReport.com
*Interviews with Jeff Grubb in Dragon #111 and #247  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Craw-daddy (talk • contribs) 17:09, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I've decided to be bold, I'm afraid - the article has been extensively extended. I think I kept most of the previous work, but I've moved it around a lot. I hope that this is ok - if not, it can always be reverted or rewritten. As an aside, my major problem with the extensive use of notability tags (especially on stubs) is that it tends to lower the quality of the articles: editors need to spend all of their time adding references, rather than developing the content to an acceptable standard (or at least to start class). Thus I figured that this article needed a framework in which to add the references.  should add that I removed the notabilty tags - I think Craw-daddy fixed that with the Pyramid references, but either way Sci Fi Weekly, IGN and JS Online should be enough. Bilby (talk) 15:56, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, in my opinion, notability is now demonstrated under WP:Notability (people)#Creative professionals.  c.f. The "collective body of work" part in particular.  --Craw-daddy | T | 16:13, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps - it should come under "multiple independent periodical articles or reviews", if nothing else. Given Jeff's reputation within the field, a combination of body of work, Pyramid (and other) reviews, and common sense may be sufficient too, although I'd be loathe to rely on the common sense argument if I could avoid it. Bilby (talk) 16:30, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Extension

message: Could anyone come up with links for Grubb's Alternity-era credits? Right now there is a gap. Newimpartial (talk) 18:26, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternity
Talk:Yom-Tov Lipmann Heller

message: I was perusing through the pages here. I wanted to see what was going on with my 12th great grandfather's page and I saw a few glaring omissions, mistakes etc. For starters his name was Gershon Shaul Yom Tov Lipman. One of my cousin's went to his grave and did a lot of research, would it be an acceptable source? http://web.mac.com/lmort/Vivian_Kahn_Family_Website/R._Yom_Tov_Lipman_Heller.html --Saxophonemn (talk) 18:36, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I recommend keeping the title "Yom-Tov Lipmann Heller" and specifying the full name with "Gershon Shaul" in the text, since he is most commonly known as Yom Tov Lipmann Heller, and his works are attributed as such. See the MOS for more info. As a side note, some scholars believe that "Gershon Shaul" was added to his name towards the end of his life (in accordance with the Jewish custom of adding to a person's name during grave illness). -shirulashem(talk) 21:52, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I second. Debresser (talk) 04:52, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections 

message: Most of these people do not have Wikipedia articles. Should these lists be kept in the article? Debresser, any thoughts? Enigmamsg 22:34, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think not. Debresser (talk) 09:43, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lengthy ancestry and descendants 

message: "It is possible but unclear whether the addition of Oettingen and Wallerstein to their names means his ancestors had connections by marriage with the noble families of the House of Oettingen-Wallerstein." As marriages between Jews and non-Jews were very unusual in those days and were certainly never recognized as legitimate, this seems far-fetched. Probably the names were added to their names because, as the article says elsewhere, they had political or other connection with the Wallerstein nobility. MikeR613 (talk) 23:00, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wallerstein 

message: The link for "Rabbi Yehoshua Heschel of Crakow, the author of Maginne Shelomoh" appears to be for another Rabbi Yehoshua Heschel [i.e. Avraham Yehoshua Heschel].
According to this article for Heller the Heschel of Crackow mentioned was head of the yeshiva in 1643 and died around 1647. He was dead before the 1648 Chmielnicki uprising/massacres started. However, Avraham Yehoshua Heschel linked was appointed head in 1654, was alive to have a position on allowing a agunah to remarry follow the Chmielnicki uprising/massacres, and died in 1663.
Fdgzoid (talk) 00:36, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The right Rabbi Yehoshua Heschel of Crakow linked?
Talk:4th Dalai Lama

message: how can he have been born in 1589, died in 1617 and be 35?  see last paragraph  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.213.126.179 (talk) 21:43, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Austerlitz -- 88.75.71.60 (talk) 19:48, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Neiwan line

message: I added details about the temporary closure of the line. I wasn't sure how to add a reference, but the information came from the Taiwan Tourism Bureau website http://202.39.225.132/jsp/Eng/html/news_event/news_content.jsp?id=4927&date=03/28/2007 Davidreid 02:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Field desorption

message: Field Desorption and Field Ionization are two different effects, the assumption that both are the same were already proven to be wrong in the early 60s!
FD was discovered by Müller in 1941, as stated in the referenced book by Beckey.
FI was first discussed in 1928 by Oppenheimer and observed in 1951 by Müller. As stated in Müller and Tsong, 1973, Field Ion Microscopy, Field Ionization and Field Evaporation
Field Desorption requires the preceding adsorption of the analyte on the electrode surface.
Field Ionization ionizes the atoms/molecules of a gas  at very low pressure using electron tunneling inside a sufficiently (1-10 V/°A) strong electric field and cannot occur below a critical distance x_c of the emitter.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leticron (talk • contribs) 17:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  FD vs FI
Talk:Trevor Blackwell

message: Existing, verifiable facts indicate that Blackwell was *not* the first to create a dynamically balancing biped robot.  Wikipedia must insure that such claims are verifiable, presented in a neutral point of view, and take into account the existing evidence.  Wikipedia biographies cannot present a biased view.
It's inappropriate for a biography to contain a lot of argumentation about priority claims, especially when the supposed claims aren't referenced. If there's an external website giving a chronology of various claims about walking robots, it'd be appropriate to reference it here.
65.96.199.13 03:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled