lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Akabane orthobunyavirus

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20080719142652/http://www.couch.net.au/about/Akabane%20Paper.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  DferDaisy (talk) 00:09, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:List of homeopathic preparations

message: The column labeled Homeopathic potency and the entire section about Notes on potencies should be deleted. All unsourced claims should also be speedily removed. If there are no objections I'll attend to this. --mikeu talk 00:42, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --mikeu talk 20:35, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  potency 

message: *Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#List_of_homeopathic_preparations  Dream Focus 12:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fringe theories noticeboard is discussing this article now 

message: It appears that researchers affiliated with NHM made a great effort to compile a database of botanicals used in homeopathy. It no longer exists on their website. The description of the database is archived but not the contents. This makes it difficult to verify the footnotes. They also published in a periodical and a book that describes some 800 species and 1700 names. I'm not quite sure why they did this, but here are the refs. I hardly think that adding 800 plants and fungi are a worthwhile effort. 
* 
*  
There should be a well defined criteria for inclusion in the list and what is considered an RS on this topic. --mikeu talk 17:48, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources, notability, and inclusion criteria 

message: I've purged all the entries that were unreferenced. Feel free to restore an entry if you can find a reliable source showing that it is commonly used today per the note at top. To recover removed material see this diff. --mikeu talk 19:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  massive cleanup 

message: I've removed most of the usage column due to lack of references. This is especially troubling per WP:MEDICAL despite the disclaimer in the heading. If there are any items that can be properly sourced the material can be recovered from this diff. --mikeu talk 20:08, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alleged homeopathic use 

message: I found the following commented out in the page. Placing here for reference. --mikeu talk 20:14, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsure about what to do
Talk:Nobukazu Takemura

message: An artist of such dubious notability does not need a separate discography, nor (as are now being submitted to AfC) articles about every album. Reventtalk 04:50, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 10:09, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Nobukazu Takemura discography]]
Talk:Fluxomics

message: I disagree. Certainly deserves its own article, even though it will remain a stub for a while.Slicky (talk) 22:02, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi BashfulSimian, I think you need to add some references to the article as soon as possible to show that this term is used. I see there was a recent paper in Env. Microbiol that would seem suitable. You might find the  template helpful for this. Let me know if you are struggling to get that to work. Alexbateman (talk) 15:33, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions
Talk:Alfa Romeo Disco Volante

message: Why does this article make no mention of the 3.0 litre six cylinder Disco Volante that has been raced in recent times in historic racing by Christopher Mann? Is his car the car described as a 3.5 litre that was dismantled? If so the description is incorrect as it was also an in-period race car with the narrow hips design. It's also widely described and competes as a 3.0 litre, not a 3.5 litre. < https://www.goodwood.com/grrc/event-coverage/goodwood-revival/2017/9/this-alfa-romeo-3000-disco-volante-is-utterly-unique/>
--Falcadore (talk) 07:40, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That car is probably 6C 3000 PR see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfa_Romeo_6C see more here http://www.alfabb.com/bb/forums/alfa-romeo-history/18361-6c3000-cm-30.html  -->Typ932 T·C 07:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  3.0 Litre Disco
Talk:John R. Jones

message: I worked on this yesterday in a library and don't know when I'll be able to again. This morning I can't access the resources and have other obligations today and this weekend, even if the digital harassment lessens. The McCray book, which I only skimmed and is not available for checkout, indicates some of the bad p.r. arose because Jones acknowledged his paternity of her grandmother decades after the war. Unfortunately, the regimental history volume concerning the 33rd is one of the weaker ones of the series, without index and the statement that Jones' brigade and one of General Winder attacked at Antietam is just plain wrong--Gen. Charles S. Winder had been associated with the Stonewall Brigade, but died at the Battle of Cedar Mountain the previous month, and Gen. John Winder was a prison commander in Richmond.Jweaver28 (talk) 11:34, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  More work needed
Template talk:2007–08 NHL Western Conference standings

message: There has to be a way to post ranking right? Jmlk17 21:47, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but what do you mean by that?  Posting their ranking position next to the team name?  That was discussed and it seemed that those who responded said they preferred the rank not be displayed by number for consistency with the other standings.  If you meant something else, please explain.--Pparazorback (talk) 01:09, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number
Template talk:2007–08 NHL Eastern Conference standings

message: When I saw the extra line in the standings, I immediately wanted to remove it because I thought it was mistakenly added.  Then I saw the note about playoff teams.  Instead of the line, would a color change for the top 8 work/look better to separate the current top 8 from the others?  I know each team's season page highlights their current ranking, but a different color can be used for the other seven teams.  I'm not sure how the "self-highlighting" green team distinction would work if another color is already designated for that row, and I don't know the color codes to try it out.  I think there is room for improvement because that current line look out of place.  Thanks.  --Mtjaws (talk) 16:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That might be a better way to do it.  I only added the little "break line" because I was afraid I'd mess things up if I tried to do any more. :) Skudrafan1 (talk) 17:26, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Whatever the consensus is, whenever I update colors, lines, etc for me is a piece of cake, but whatever method used would have to be easy for other editors to modify.  With these standings transcluded onto the team season pages, are the colors ok?  Colors, lines, any other idea?  I am working third tonight so I have to get some sleep, but will be back on here tomorrow evening and will see what has been come up with.  --Pparazorback (talk) 23:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Personal opinion, I do not like the coloring, especially when the standings are transcluded onto a team season page with the darker blue, lighter blue, and green.  It does not look right.  So far, the subtle line looks a little better.  --Pparazorback (talk) 00:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Neither do I. I didnt even think about the green when I did it. No problems though, but is there a way to make a darker line? Grsz11 (talk) 03:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I liked the first example the most, with the gray line being thicker, but I think it could help distinguish between the top 8 and bottom 8 if it was made darker. I'm not sure how to do that though, if it's just as simple as a bg code, or something else. Tampabay721 (talk) 19:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work, folks.  I quite like the grey bar and it makes it look a lot cleaner.  Since a "division leader" label is included, should a "Top 8 teams make the playoffs" explanation be included too?  It would explain why there are two sections to the standings.  Thoughts?  --Mtjaws (talk) 08:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Playoff team designation
Talk:Rosin–Rammler distribution

message: This article now says:
: The function is described by
: 
:: R={e^{- \left( {\frac {D}} \right) ^{n}}}.
In view of what it says later in the article, this would seem to be the cumulative distribution function, and I'm guessing it means as a function of the variable D, although it doesn't say so.  I shouldn't have to guess, and I shouldn't have to read what it says later to understand this.  This article also needs attention in a few other respects.  Probably I'll be back later. Michael Hardy (talk) 22:26, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you be more specific?  When you say "other measurement methods", do you mean things other than mass are measured?  E.g. volume?  Or number of particles?  If so, would the distribution still be a Rosin-Rammler distribution? Michael Hardy (talk) 04:45, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

text: There are a huge variety of possible measurement techiques for measuring particle size distributions, see PSD measurement techniques for a bit of a list. Sieves analysis is one of the few methods that gives you results in terms of mass fraction, as opposed to percentage of particles. I have seen discussion related to fitting results obtained using other measurement techniques, in these cases the distribution wouldn't be fitted to a mass fraction. I think that it'd likely still be a Rosin-Rammler distribution (since making the assumption of uniform density makes a mass fraction analogous to a number of particles fraction). This needs to be researched before the article explicity states that the distribution is for use with mass fractions only. When I have more time I will try and find a reference that has an explicit statement either way. Noodle snacks (talk) 06:31, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

text: As "pure" mathematicians understand the term, it would still technically be a probability distribution. Michael Hardy (talk) 21:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Perhaps the sensible approach is to talk about the function in a purely mathematical sense, then discuss its uses etc?Noodle snacks (talk) 11:16, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

message: The two pages describe exactly the same function. The Weibull page is more mature mathematically and has been around longer, but there are a few useful notes on use with particle size distributions here that should be kept.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noodle snacks (talk • contribs) 07:20, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and nobody has disagreed, so I suggest you go ahead and perform a selective paste merger. --Qwfp (talk) 10:04, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Proposal
Template talk:Brothers Grimm

message: Is Grimm's law really a "key article"?? —ScouterSig 22:27, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose it isn't really, but if it isn't in this section, then where else could it go? (Midnightblueowl (talk) 21:24, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that it has been moved, I agree it's better where it is now (Midnightblueowl (talk) 17:11, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Grimm's law

message: The Brothers Grimm portal was recently deleted. I've removed the red link from the template. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 10:06, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: No portal, no portal link
Talk:Driving licence in Norway

message: This article is horribly written.  I have rewritten the part on driver's education, which was factually incorrect, but it still needs a lot of work.  A good starting point (for someone able to read Norwegian) would be the applicable legislation. DES (talk) 22:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style 
Talk:Waterloo Village, New Jersey

message: Thank you Jim Henderson for the "white section" edits.  I did some additional tweaking.  Hopefully I improved the situation.  About a week ago, we had another well-intentioned contributor downsizing the photos, but he forgot to compensate for the downsizing.  I moved some of the photos around and tried to get text to wrap around the photos.  If it doesn't work on your computer then feel free to further tweak it.Wally From Columbia (NJ) (talk) 17:21, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it's still a bit messy, in part because the captions are too big.  That's why making the pictures smaller didn't improve the layout as well as it often does.  It's not so bad on a low screen resolution setting, but right now I'm using a high res screen and no matter what the font size, it still looks messy, and of course articles need to be adjusted so they look good on different screen settings rather than vice versa.  A small trim of captions won't be very difficult but someone who knows the place must figure how to transfer some of the textual information from the captions to the main text.  Me, I spent Saturday bicycling from Newark to Chatham and got plenty of pictures but have no plan to visit Waterloo.  But it's tempting enough to make me ask, how many miles to the nearest commuter rail station?  Jim.henderson (talk) 14:18, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo layout
Talk:Lachlan Fold Belt

message: Not my area - I am not a geologist - but I find it odd that there is no mention at all of minerals in this article, given that the LFB is home to significant ore deposits like Cobar, Cadia, North Parkes and many, many other mineral deposits that have been mined in the past (e.g. Mount Boppy/Canbelego, Leadville, Bobadah, Gilgunnia, Mount Hope, Gilambone, Nymagee, Sunny Corner, Burraga, etc. to name just a few.).TrimmerinWiki (talk) 10:30, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minerals
Talk:Church of World Messianity

message: I'm not certain "messianity" is a word. Google it - the only results are those related to this organization. 世界救世 (sekai kyuusei) more literally translates to "saving the world" or "the world's salvation"... Is "Church of World Messianity" known to be for sure the standard English name of the organization? LordAmeth (talk) 18:19, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you answered your own question -- tons of links out there using "Messianity" as the official name.    etc... Jpatokal (talk) 04:45, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Messianity 
Talk:Paraprotopteryx

message: Don't know if this is the right word, but may I suggest the article is not just a string of technically correct terms made into links, so that it can make sense in the English language and free up the prose for browsing the article? In other words, a little more description helps rather than hurts and does not diminish the article the links refer to at all. A good example of improvement is when you put (wishbone) after the scientific term, more of this please. Makes a scientific article more engaging for readers. : ) Julia Rossi (talk) 23:00, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I'm working on it.  I'm just trying not to introduce any WP:OR. Vultur (talk) 19:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Paleontology speak
Talk:Boberg Hundred

message: Can someone who has more horsepower redirect searches of "Boberg" to the article on Carl Boberg or at least provide for disambiguation?  209.205.174.17 (talk) 23:12, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! It was almost a year since your request but it still seemed like a useful Dab to create. Tomas e (talk) 16:40, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs disambiguation
Talk:Iono-sama Fanatics

message: Okay, this is a pretty tangle. The English publisher's website gives the title as Iono-sama Fanatics, but the graphic they display (used in the infobox) is not their own -- it's the MediaWorks edition, with Iono the fanatics on the cover (yes, in English, with that capitalization). My copy of the English edition has Iono-sama Fanatics on the cover, spine, and copyright page -- same artwork as the MediaWorks version, just the title changed -- and that's what's used on e.g. Amazon. On messagebords, I've seen the series called both of those and Iono-sama the Fanatics. Google gives 3900 hits for "Iono the Fanatics" and 6900 for "Iono-sama Fanatics." (And 20 hits for "Iono-sama the Fanatics".)
So which should we be using? I think the official English version, Iono-sama Fanatics. And we need to move the article. —Quasirandom (talk) 15:27, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess the page should be moved to Iono-sama Fanatics then, and mention in the lead how it was originally translated to Iono the Fanatics by the Japanese.--十八 20:28, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  You want to do the honors or shall I? —Quasirandom (talk) 21:37, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and did it.--十八 23:24, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official title? 
Talk:Dan Healy (soundman)

message: People: Dan Healy was the man who built the Wall of Sound! It was Bear's idea, but it was Dan Healy who actually built it. It's one thing to have brilliant idea, it's another thing (not better, just another) to actually make it happen. I don't have references at hand but there are plenty. There are other issues with this article but I'd be happy if at least Dan Healy got credit where credit is due! 2A02:1210:624A:3400:48EA:D2D4:DF8D:D919 (talk) 06:56, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wall of Sound
Talk:Impossibility defense

message: Please consider this sentence in the article:
"An example of a failed attempt of law is a person who shoots at a tree stump, believing that he is committing attempted murder; that person cannot be prosecuted for attempted murder as there is no manifest intent to kill by shooting a stump."
Surely, in the example, the shooter would believe that he is committing a murder at the time that he shoots - perhaps just after, if he realizes that he has missed, he might think that he has just committed attempted murder, but, at the instant of commission, it is actual murder which he intends and believes he is committing.
101.117.107.91 (talk) 05:18, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the word "attempted" correct in this sentence?
Talk:Qt Extended

message: it would be a great idea to talk a little bit about the qtopia versions such as :
*qtopia 1.x
*qtopia 2.x
*qtopia 4.x
GNUtoo(my point of views(for npov), howto customise a signature) | talk 23:26, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Qtopia versions
Wikipedia talk:Ignore all rules/Versions

message: Sign 'em if you like. —Ashley Y 23:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Would look better, on the projectpage in my opinion if SIGS were not used. Also, links to the DIFF, and the approx date of the revision could be useful information to include, in some format or other. Newbyguesses - Talk 11:33, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Versions

message: I suggest simply listing the entries, but in bunches of five, then a space to the next bunch. The headers I tried before were over the top, maybe, so any other ideas? Newbyguesses - Talk 01:19, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: How about

message: the one from the story of the monastery: he's been clearly gaming the system, he lied :)
he never crossed the deep valley.
...
all right all right, I got the point of the story :P
A71104 (talk) 20:49, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: About the young brother

message: During a discussion about retargeting a redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2014_May_2#Wikipedia:IAP which was closed as no consensus the suggestion of merging Wikipedia:Ignore all precedent into this article was raised and it had no opposing opinions raised. The discussion was closed as "no consensus" by an involved admin after it had been open for a month, though IMHO this portion of the discussion did have consensus. For clarity I'm seeking further input on merging. The basis for merge is that Wikipedia:Ignore all precedent raises nothing new or dramatically different to warrant being a separate essay. Gnangarra 11:06, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Dangling for almost 2 years. Will remove, and leave as is, the default choice. Personally, IAR and IAPD feel different. The first is a one time dispensation b/c of specifics; the second, while similar, has a slightly broader feel, exemplified by e.g. including the potential that the stated precedent is dissimilar in some relevant detail. FeatherPluma (talk) 18:56, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that IAPD is a thing of its own and it should seek its own consensus. I think that IAR is its own thing and already enjoys its own consensus. I don't think we should conflate the two ideas. I think that ignoring rules is far safer in general than ignoring precedent. HighInBC 20:27, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

text: Sorry, I was commenting on the wrong page. I thought this was the talk page of the primary IAR page. I have no opinion on its inclusion in the /Versions page. HighInBC 20:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge -- Ignore all Precedent
Talk:Palais–Smale compactness condition

message: An anon editor added:
:Here I'[x] denotes the Fréchet derivative of I at x \in H.
Well, yes and no.  I is a functional on a Hilbert space; the domain is reflexive and the range is the reals (also a Hilbert space, but also the space of scalars).  We can make a stronger statement:
:I is differentiable at u\in H if there exists v\in H such that
::I[w] = I[u] + (v,w-u) + o(\Vert w-u\Vert)
:for all w\in H.  Thus we can write I':H\rightarrow H and I'[u]=v.
Dunno how to work that into the article in a sensible way.  I don't think it appears anywhere else in Wikipedia; for instance, it doesn't appear in the Derivative (generalizations) article.  Lunch (talk) 23:26, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  definition of "derivative" in the strong formulation