lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hans Krebs (Wehrmacht general)

message: Most of this article does not appear to be about Krebs at all but about the general situation etc. It needs drastic slimming down. David Lauder 16:28, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article

message: Just read this article which says he died on 1st May, but lower down he was alive on 2nd May.  Are there any references to when he actually died?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.77.111.142 (talk) 21:35, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Krebs apparently committed suicide after midnight on 2 May, although some other sources state it occurred on 1 May, before midnight. See: Beevor (2002), p. 387 and Joachimsthaler (1999), p. 288. Kierzek (talk) 01:46, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: he actually died shortly after Hitler's death 71.221.81.33 (talk) 14:58, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ofcourse, he died after Hitler; but it was on the 1 (before midnight) or 2 of May (after midnight). No one has stated he did not.Kierzek (talk) 15:38, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death

message: This article is currently almost completely focused on events in Berlin at the end of the war in Europe - a total of four days. What about the rest of his career? Staff officers may not be the most exiting roles, but there must be available on his career than this. If he was a staff officer for the whole of the Second World War, what units did he serve with? What did he do in the First World War?Nigel Ish (talk) 17:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unbalanced coverage 

message: Mentioned twice, but where / when did he learn this fluent russian? Rustygecko (talk) 14:56, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess he Lerned it in school 71.221.81.33 (talk) 14:56, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoke fluent russian
Talk:Cut Carefully And Play Loud

message: I believe this article should be deleted. I recently created a more thorough article for Cut Carefully and Play Loud, not realizing that this article existed with the "And" capitalized. After discovering this article I have incorporated the cover image and review link into mine, and this stub article is no longer relevant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by IllaZilla2 (talk • contribs) 04:51, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've redirected this article (written by me) to yours as it's better! Dancarney 12:48, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark for deletion?
Talk:RPath

message: Which areas specifically have excessive cliches and jargon? SvenR 15:55, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the first two paragraphs. NicM 19:08, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm...compared to a number of the pages it links to, this page seems no more or less software industry jargon laden. Can you please be more specific, or propose edits that would address the issue you perceive? Bpjadam 15:41, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is much better now, the only thing now I would either define or rephrase is "divergent software development," if I knew what it meant. NicM 15:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  cliches and jargon 

message: The mediawiki appliance, for instance has been retired.  The rPath on the VMware site dates back to 2006 with no updates.  I attempted communication on the forum but got no response even to a "ping" for attention!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by John van v (talk • contribs) 22:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: rPath seems to be falling into disuse

message: This article has suddenly filled with marketing-speak and fluff. I don't have time to solve it now. --Enric Naval (talk)4
:: +1, it makes no sense at all from a technical/informative point of view —Ismael Luceno (talk) 03:42, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  marketing speak
Talk:Freestyle motocross

message: How about the possibility of expanding the section of famous riders into a new article that covers more than the famous riders. There have been plenty of riders that have been in the X-Games, ASTs, and Gravity Games that are not famous.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vetes (talk • contribs) 19:37, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Maikel Melero - Exhibición Freestyle GP Camión de España 2013 - 01.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on August 23, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-08-23. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:49, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Maikel Melero - Exhibición Freestyle GP Camión de España 2013 - 01.jpg]] to appear as POTD 

message: Why have I never seen a barrel roll someone somehow  somewhere ? 174.215.150.68 (talk) 14:31, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barrel roll
Talk:Metamorphosis (disambiguation)

message: While I realize that usually misspellings are not encyclopediac, the case of metamorphosis/metamorphoses is an exception because the dissimilarly spelled works in question (Ovid's vs. Kafka's) are significant, and the popularity of the biological term makes it all the more likely that a reader would have difficulty recognizing that they misspelled Ovid's title. rewinn 15:56, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to my dictionary, "metamorphoses" is the plural of "metamorphosis." Recury 17:25, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Common misspelling

message: I've requested that this page be moved to Metamorphosis (disambiguation) so that Metamorphosis (biology) can be moved here, per Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Primary_topic.  Thoughts? --jwandersTalk 21:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. The biological meaning is primary; the other meanings are references to it.  rewinn 21:52, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Support. Biological sense is far far more commom, and as a above. Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 10:32, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Support per nom. Crumbsucker 15:27, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Support. Recury 17:22, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Fine with me. Tamfang 20:40, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested Move 
Talk:Kenwood Historic District (St. Petersburg, Florida)

message: With respect to Historic Kenwood, the boundaries quoted in the story are incorrect. The Eastern boundry includes 21st Street and actually goes all the way over to I-275 which actually creates the eastern boundry. You can find this quoted in the Final Survey posted on the internet.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.89.249.134 (talk) 12:05, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:X Toolkit Intrinsics

message: The last link is dead (Comparison of X11 Toolkits).
----
It is probably more difficult to write software that interacts with Xt than it is to write your own version that works exactly the way you want atop Xlib.
This seems like someone's opinion; however well-founded, it would be better to have some kind of cited reference for this statement.
--Brian Gaeke (talk) 23:00, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

message: That doesn't work well, leads (as in a recent edit) to mis-remembering things. TEDickey (talk) 21:40, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  using your memory in lieu of a reliable source 

message: That comment appears to be untrue, and since there's no WP:RS, can be removed.  In a quick check of the source, these files are relevant to the comment:
  1126   444   |Convert.c                                                       
  1902   518>  |Converters.c                                                    
  1084   364   |Initialize.c                                                    
  2210   814   |TMparse.c                                                       
----------------                                                                
  6322  2140>   total lines/statements         
However, Xt is much larger than that:
 46841 14898>   total lines/statements
i.e.,. the modules for parsing are almost 15% of the total. TEDickey (talk) 11:44, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most of Xt's code was dedicated to parsing settings  

message: An edit added FLTK a while back, but checking typical installs fails to support the notion that it is "widely used" (less than 10% as many occurrences as Xaw).  Some WP:RS is needed, with actual numbers TEDickey (talk) 15:02, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Holy crap. The reason for "most" is because the list included GTK and Qt, which do in fact cover more than 50% of the toolkit dependencies. I have no idea why FLTK is in there but adding it does not cause "most" to be false. Still it should be removed rather than just putting "dubious" on things. I tried and it got reverted, no idea why.Spitzak (talk) 19:22, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

text: I agree, I just think whoever thought it was wrong should have fixed it by removing FLTK, rather than changing "most" to "some" and adding the "dubious" tag.Spitzak (talk) 01:04, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  widely used 

message: The phrase "Definitive Guides", etc., does not appear on the title or copyright pages of these books.  It is merely a promotional term which should not be part of the citation TEDickey (talk) 21:10, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  promotional term is not part of title
Talk:Chester Thordarson

message: --Smileyporkpyn 16:07, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Thordarson, an immigrant, did not finish grammar school, loved to read.  He read every book he could get his hands on.  When he was 18 he went back to grammar school and then high school to get his education.
He displayed his One Million Volt transformer at a world's fair.
He bought Rock Island for $5,300 in 1910, then built a boat house and a home on the island, but largely left the island otherwise untouched.  He was given an award for conservation by the University of Wisconsin, Madison, for his conservatory vision.
See video at: http://wpt2.org/npa/IW817thordarson.cfm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.165.198.20 (talk) 00:43, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article should have a picture of him. It would be nice if we there was a better picture of the boathouse too. I added a photo request.MeropeRiddle (talk) 19:55, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos
Talk:Alcoholism/Archive 3

message: Textually, this means that any drinking at all, whether it be often or only intermittently every now and then, is alcoholism. The "excessive" is important, and something like "habitual" or "repetitive" is also. —Centrx?talk • 07:14, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm, no, that's not the intent. I'll try to reword it. The problem is that an individual can have alcoholism but drink only rarely. A heavy drinker, on the other hand, might not have alcoholism. The disease is independent of the quantity of alcohol intake. Imagine, if you will, a binge drinker who doesn't drink for long periods of time, but then drinks to the point of oblivion, losing his job in the process and ending up in the hospital with DT's. His total alcohol intake might not be very much compared to your average college student, but he's alcoholic and the college student probably isn't. Drgitlow 13:56, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the article would be incomplete without the APA's stance that lighter drinking can also be a sign of alcoholism as well as their definition of alcoholism.  By introducing this in the opening paragraphs we're inviting more contention.  I think there is a more logical place to put the APA's stance.  To me the entry needs to be as contention proof as we can make it.  Mr Christopher 15:16, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that's the APA's position necessarily. The DSM diagnostic criteria don't address intake levels at all. I just looked through the DSM section and didn't see anything on light drinking versus heavy drinking. It's not that lighter drinking is a sign of alcoholism -- I'd never try to argue that light drinkers are, in general, alcoholics. I think in general (vast majority of the time) they are not. (We all agree on that, right?) The criteria are saying only that one need not be a heavy drinker to suffer from alcoholism. In my last edit, I tried to remove any indication of light versus heavy from the opening paragraph so that the condition is noted to be present solely based upon the effects of alcohol. I think that's consistent with the DSM definition, with the JAMA definition, and with your perspective as well, is it not? Happy 4th, by the way! Drgitlow 15:53, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well rain ended the fireworks display too soon but other than that things are swell this holiday weekend.  Yes your latest edits to the entry are good and advance the cause of consensus building as well.  Nice.  I think we have made some significant recent strides.  Mr Christopher 17:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with "intermittent or continual"
Talk:Pansori gosu

message: How about change title of this article to Gosu(Pansori) and add to disambiguation page with Gosu?
Naming 'Pansori gosu' is something ridiculous.(Most Koreans say Pansori gosu just as 'Gosu').--Nunting 16:13, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming Convention
Talk:Test probe

message: In this extract:
 "At low frequencies (where the resistance of R is much less than the reactance of C), the
 circuit looks like a resistive divider; at high frequencies (resistance much greater than
 reactance), the circuit looks like a capacitive divider.[1]"
I think at low frequencies the resistance is dominant, thus it looks like a resistive divider, and at high frequencies the reactance is dominant, thus it looks like a capacitive divider.
I have not made the edit because I may be wrong and would like others to confirm.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.209.58.71 (talk) 10:02, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passive probes 

message: Why the voltage difference in a high voltage transformer with measurement of high voltage side through a capacitive divider and low voltage side with a multi meter  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.211.96.58 (talk) 07:13, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sperate source test on Transformer
Talk:Biostatistics

message: Hmmm... it seems to me that this article is pretty much in the beginning stages.  What is written, in my opinion, is very informational, but for a layperson, I still don't get what biostatistics is.  I could gander it's the confluence of biology and statistics, and interpolate that with people like Mendel, Darwin et al you take biological informatics and push them through some statistical analysis.  But is that biostatistics?  It would seem that there should be a lot of hypothesizing and science involved that elevates the current ideas of the time through the use of this statistical analysis.  Am I off?  If so, maybe we could add the information that better describes what biostatistics is, in practical terms.  Rhetth 17:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs for article: 

message: Hi everyone, I'm wondering if it's in the scope of this section/article to give mention to Francis Galton? He is a pioneer in quantifying genetic analysis, which I feel is relevent in the field of biostatistics. Does anyone agree? Nawalani (talk) 01:05, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biostatistics and the history of biological thought 

message: We forgot about Python, Scala, C which everything is based off, and if you were to not cite C that would be plagiarism. You know everything is from C which is written in machine-code right? Databases/no-sql,sql, I mean everything can't be done in Excel right? 68.134.243.51 (talk) 22:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tools are outdated prior to 8/11/22 edit
Talk:Ad eundem degree

message: I removed this line:
:and in the universities of New Zealand where it is known as "admission ad eundem statum"
This is incorrect or confusing. Admission ad eundem statum is not the same thing as an ad eundem degree at least as described in this page. It is admission to a NZ University with university entrance/secondary qualifications other then the official New Zealand secondary qualifications (NCEA nowadays although older qualifications are obviously still NZ qualifications). For example, GCE A-level, Australian qualifications etc. These qualifications are recognised as 'equivalent' to the NZ qualifications for entrance purposes. However the university is not awarding you the NZ secondary qualifications, you don't have NCEA or anything of that sort. And this obviously has nothing to do with degree level qualifications Nil Einne 16:15, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Zealand 

message: I haven't touched the text because I'd have to consult the University Calendars (and they're in Durham and I'm in London); but I don't think that Durham has awarded degrees ad eundem since the approval of the Statutes of 1909: see Charles Whiting's The University of Durham 1832-1932 at p 182. Kranf (talk) 21:36, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You'd be right on that http://www.archive.org/details/calendar1011durhuoft is an online version of the 1910/1911 calendar and contains a copy of the statutes, which on page 563 states Ad eundem degrees shall no longer be granted.Allialliw (talk) 01:54, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Durham 

message: I'd really appreciate someone who knows inserting how to pronounce "eundem" and which syllable gets the stress, unless it turns out to be monosyllabic of course. Dick Kimball (talk) 14:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 
Talk:Edward Mylius

message: I'm going to find the cutting from The Times of the 1910 court case.
:That anonymous declaration of a quest, as yet unaccomplished, seems to date from 2006. "Freedom's Frontier"   2007 by Donald Thomas calls Mylius "an English assistant editor". He was in England, that's why The Authorities were able to Deal With Him. "Edward" does not seem the conventional French spelling.--SilasW (talk) 21:04, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shark liver oil

message: There is no evidence that this smelly substance has any effect on hemorrhoids at all.  It is a folk remedy without substance.  --69.152.169.40 (talk) 06:08, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hemorrhoid research 

message: Overfishing of sharks has caused a significant drop in shark populations that poses dangers to ocean ecosystems worldwide"
Is this really relevant to what shark liver oil is?  Should this line be included in this page?
:It depends on whether a significant number of sharks are hunted predominantly for their livers.  If shark liver oil is considered a byproduct of other shark products it is not relevant.  This could be determined by comparing the economic value of shark oil/fins/meat/etc.4hodmt 14:19, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: According to the National Geographic Society 

message: I'm looking into taking shark liver oil as a supplement, but I don't want to support an industry that has a negative impact on global shark populations.  I would like to see some discussion in this article about the sustainability of this supplement and if it does in fact impact the environment negatively.--64.81.241.188 19:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sustainability of supplement 

message: Cleaned this up a bit - originally sounded like it was written by an eighth grade student.  Do we have any source for this theory about electrical charges?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.168.203.110 (talk) 19:15, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Barometer" section 

message: The film Man of Aran documents it's use by Irish cultures as a lamp oil.  Chrisrus (talk) 01:35, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  as lamp oil 

message: Why does this article talk about the supplement not being used by american physicians?  Surely it's an international article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.123.162.38 (talk) 08:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Physicians
Talk:Calinda

message: Why Kalinda into Calinda and not the other way around? Guettarda 16:21, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: I support merging the two entries, because the "kalinda" and "calinda" are the same dance merely spelled two different ways.  I am unsure which spelling is the more preferred of the two.  I would merge the two myself if I had time at present; perhaps in the near future, if someone else doesn't do so. --Skb8721 15:40, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I merged Kalenda in as well, as they all seem to have the same origins. --70.48.230.158 03:51, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: There's a lot more to the history of the Calinda that needs to be added to the page with the proper citations of course. Calinda in Trinidad and Tobago is a lot more detailed and has many components that makes the art very unique. Sdunc2 (talk) 17:42, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements 

message: Kalinda in New Orleans http://www.frenchcreoles.com/ArtTheater/CalindaDance/calindadance.htm
History of stick-fighting (Calinda) http://www.mypanyard.co.uk/History-stick-fighting-bois.html
Another detail on the history of stick fighting http://www.unitedmags.com/stick-fighting-in-trinidad
Documentary on stick fighting roots newspaper reference http://www.guardian.co.tt/entertainment/2013-07-29/documentary-reveals-stick-fighting-roots  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdunc2 (talk • contribs) 07:57, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Bibliography
Talk:Valentina Vostok

message: "Ultimately, when Negative Man was found alive and rescued by the new Doom Patrol, the negative energy having abandoned Valentina and was thus returned to Larry Trainor."
I haven't read the relevant issue. This is a clause, not a sentence, and should not end with a period- "Ultimately, when Negative Man was found alive and rescued by the new Doom Patrol, the negative energy having abandoned Valentina and was thus returned to Larry Trainor, (something)" - or if this is intended to be a complete sentence, it needs to be rewritten; since I don't know quite what happened, someone who does needs to rewrite it so that I don't do so mistakenly ("Ultimately, when Negative Man was found alive and rescued by the new Doom Patrol, the negative energy abandoned Valentina and was returned to Larry Trainor."?  Something else? What was the order of events?) Schissel | Sound the Note! 16:57, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help with this please?
Talk:Grange Estate

message: I have deleted all but the first sentence of this article.  There are so many hoaxes and flat out lies in this article (it is part of the hoaxing of Wikipedia with the nonsense about the Eyre/Heller/Peters family, all of which has been proven to be false).  None of the information in the article could be sourced, so I've pared it down to a bare single sentence.  I would appreciate any additions to the article, so long as they are verifiable sources.  User:Zoe|(talk) 16:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of it seems to have been accurate, if  is considered a "verifiable source". Choess 08:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, when I tried to reach that site all day yesterday, it was down.  Much of the history of the place, involving the Eyres and others in the hoaxing, was definitely not correct.  User:Zoe|(talk) 23:15, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I wanted to edit the picture and the first line of the entry, but did not know how.
The Grange is not in Haverford, it is in Havertown.  It is in Haverford township, but its addrsss is Havertown, PA.  
Check the caption on the enlaged picture on the page for source.  
Thanks
:Unsigned comments moved here from main article.--BillFlis (talk) 12:53, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Location?