Talk:Khaled Ben Mustafa

message: This article contained two brief paragraphs of explanation of the Combatant Status Review Tribunals.  I started adding the brief explanation based on feedback I got from readers.  I agree with them that a brief explanation is appropriate and makes the articles more accessible to readers who aren't familiar with the details of how Guantanamo is run.
Another wikipedian removed it today, with the explanation that it was "irrelevant".  But I believe they are mistaken.  Further, I am going to suggest to them that this may be an instance when they are misreading WP:BOLD.  --  Geo Swan 20:45, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Relevance of a brief explanation of the Combatant Status Review Tribunals?

message: This article is one of a series that had a number of valid and useful wikilinks removed with an edit summary "unlink interpretation of questionable source".
I don't think this is a sufficient explanation, and I don't think this removal of wikilinks was a good idea.
I think the wikilinks should be restored to this article and the other articles.  Geo Swan (talk) 09:30, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Already explained and under discussion here and in a related discussion here. I have told you that and i have ask you multiple times in a friendly way to continue the discussions and to answer my questions. here and here and on other places. I think your behavior is disruptive. I would appreciate if you could answer the questions and continue started discussions. Thank you. IQinn (talk) 04:55, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  removal of valid and useful wikilinks 

message: User:DBigXray took an interest in Guantanamo articles in August 2012 -- including this one.  DBigXray applied hundreds of poorly explained or unexplained editorial tags, as they did here.  There was a huge discussion at ANI over DBig's activities. During the middle of this discussion DBig stopped participating on the wikipedia -- at least under that ID.
So it would be pointless to ask them to come back and explain the tags they applied here.
I am going to wait a reasonable period of time, and if no one else explains these tags, I am going to remove them.  Geo Swan (talk) 14:31, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Please fis the problems i have called out before removing tags. --DBigXray 14:07, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Responsible use of tags 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Khaled Ben Mustafa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5glw9fmMmPBK6o3H7k_lzmjIR4rBwD9DU5QC00
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080625052741/http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/000201-000299.pdf to http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/000201-000299.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8471907/WikiLeaks-Guantanamo-Bay-terrorist-secrets-revealed.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:44, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Khaled Ben Mustafa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140417095128/http://wikileaks.ch/gitmo/pdf/fr/us9fr-000236dp.pdf to http://wikileaks.ch/gitmo/pdf/fr/us9fr-000236dp.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312055148/http://www.cageprisoners.com/articles.php?id=14740 to http://www.cageprisoners.com/articles.php?id=14740
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:26, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified