Talk:Triple talaq

message: --Striver 23:50, 16 July (UTC)
Sakina Asghar (20 july 2001) a student of University of Delhi had given her views regarding the triple talaq. she made this  clear in an interview with DD channel  that triple talaq has nothing to do with the shia community as divorce is a very difficult process in shia muslim.she is greatly influenced by Dr sayed Ammar Nakshawani and she explained it dfggcgg
all the facts based on sayed 's lecture.
other students also expressed their thought and claimed triple talaq as an evil..  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.69.245.132 (talk) 16:22, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

message: Note:
From 22 August 2017 Supreme court of India declared Triple talaq Illegal in India.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.227.224.58 (talk) 07:32, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Tell That to Umar and his followers. Shia agree. --Striver 21:48, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I was raised Sunni, they (most) consider it Haraam and has been the subject of comedy abd satire by many sunnis--The Brain 22:55, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, but that dosnt change that there are Sunis that deem it Halal. --Striver 16:16, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  triple Talaq has to happen on three different occasions 

message: I removed this string of Arabic text and placed it here. If someone can translate it (and it's relevant to the article), please do so and place it back in the article. Kerowyn  Leave a note  04:38, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation=

message: I've removed the blatent POV intro. Here it is for those who want to review it (I've abridged the quotes):
----
(...Quote...)
This verse is self-explanatory: there is no concept of three divorces in Islam. It is after the second divorce that a man can retain his wife or get separated. The concept Of "Three Divorces" does not exist in the Quran.
The concept of "triple Talaq in one sitting"  or "Instant Talaq" is alien to the Quran. The misconception that issuing "so called Three Talaqs in one sitting" will terminate nikah (marriage) and will result in irrevocable talaq is nothing but mockery of the laws. The Holy Quran explicitly lays down principles for talaq and marital discord as follows:
Surah Nisah ....4:35... (...Quote...)
In this ayat of Surah Nisa, Allah clearly asks for arbitration and reconcillation with the help of relatives. Therefore,it is clear that no Talaq can be effective without their interference, whether given once, twice, thrice or a hundred times.
The Surah Talaq Verses 1-12  (...Quote...)
Thus, it is clear from the above surah that the concept of "Three Divorces" does not exist in the Quran.
The concept of triple talaq in one go was just an innovation by Caliph Umar and doesn't find any place in the Holy Quran.
The scholars and religious bodies who validate triple talaq in one sitting (without arbitration, reconciliation, and many other conditions as required in the Quran) need to learn that the Laws of Allah are above sayings of any Caliph. Even if it served during the reign of a caliph it can not be applicable to for all times to come, as it is only the Quran which is to be followed for all time.
----
Here is an abridged version;
*The Quran is self-explanitory on the matter. There is no concept of three divorces in Islam. 
*The concept Of "Three Divorces" does not exist in the Quran. 
*The concept of "triple Talaq in one sitting"  or "Instant Talaq" is alien to the Quran. 
*It is clear that no Talaq can be effective without interference of reconciliation. 
*It is clear from a quote that the concept of "Three Divorces" does not exist in the Quran. 
*The concept of triple talaq in one go doesn't find any place in the Holy Quran. 
The concept of triple talaq in one go was just an innovation by Caliph Umar. The scholars and religious bodies who validate triple talaq need to learn [despite being scholars, and reputable religious bodies not merely a single pov-pushing wikipedia editor] that the Laws of Allah are above sayings of any Caliph. 
----
It should be fairly obvious why this is a blatent pov-rant. Hence why I've removed it. Newman Luke (talk) 02:39, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  blatent POV intro 

message: There is a merge discussion here Pass a Method talk 13:28, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge