Talk:Man's Search for Meaning

message: I added an info book to this. it could use some clarification in the info box. b_cubed 16:40, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Image:1frankl-book.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 23:54, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:1frankl-book.JPG

message: I have restored the quotes that someone deleted.  The person thought they were poorly written.  I disagree. I believe all of the quotes are accurate. If they are inaccurate, I think we should correct them but not delete them. I will request the user who deleted them to respond here to discuss and reach consensus before making further changes. DBlomgren 01:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoring quotations from book 

message: Frankl has dictated the book in only nine days. what does that mean? Twipley (talk) 03:05, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the nine days 

message: The original publication date for both the first writing, titled From Death Camp to Existentialism, and the revised and expanded version titled Man's Search for Meaning was 1959 by Beacon Press.  The date is clearly stated in the Pocket Book edition that was published in 1963, which I have in my library.
 —  .`^) Paine Ellsworthdiss`cuss (^`.  03:23, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication date 

message: Seems to suggest people read the book in the bookstore. I'm guessing it means second most purchased? Thmazing (talk) 19:18, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is the second-most widely read Holocaust book in the bookstore of Washington's Holocaust Museum. 

message: Currently the first reference (Man's Search For Meaning full text) seems broken.
Wouldyoujust (talk) 00:53, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference doesn't work 

message: Paragraph 3 of the article should be moved to become a second paragraph in the section "Reception." Explicit reference to other criticism, such as that of Timothy Pytell, could be added. 2604:2000:1103:81AA:19A8:733A:8EF9:D380 (talk) 19:08, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move reference to Langer's criticism to Reception section.  

message: The title in the 2nd edition graphic here uses "Psycholog"; other editions (including Penguin, 2009) spell it "Psychologe" ... is this an Austria vs. Germany spelling thing? (Was first published in Austria, later in Germany.)
Asr34 (talk) 01:57, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: "Psycholog" is (older) Austrian German. Like all Southern German dialects they sometimes drop the "e" at the ending. Even though published some decades later the title would have included "Psychologe", the "dropped e" version is clearly possible in an edition around 1950. JensOhle (talk) 15:18, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psycholog vs. Psychologe 

message: I believe that the article should have more in depth discussion about the format and a cohesive summary about the book. As well as a significantly expanded "Logotherapy" Section. I will add as I have time. I recently completed an Essay and Summary about Man's Search for Meaning available here. I will use this as source material and begin working on the article. Jroibal1 (talk) 14:14, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You cannot use a self published essay as a source, see WP:RS and WP:NOR. MrOllie (talk) 14:19, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: 10-4, I get it, thanks Mr. Ollie for protecting Wikipedia Jroibal1 (talk) 14:49, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving the Article with Summary, Additional Description of Logotherapy 

message: The last sentence of the fourth paragraph in "Reception" hardly seems impartial or informative. 
It baselessly calls published criticisms of the book  "inapt" and "misleading" and says that they "could be dismissed altogether". 
The sentence feels out of place and opinionated, and it could be omitted without making the article any less informative.
Any suggestions for replacing it? VNTRY (talk) 20:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impartiality