lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:High School of Music & Art

message: WP is not a directory. the list of alumni should only include people who have WP articles, or who are likely to have one created based on their current or past notability. for all redlinks, references should be provided for EACH name showing A-they are an alumni of the school, and B-they are notable. otherwise its just a magnet for self promotion or memorializing.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:52, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, I can't find what the asterisks in the alumni list are supposed to signify.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.208.81.193 (talk) 21:34, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed, this list needs cleanup.  All unsourced redlinks should be removed. --Elonka 16:33, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:40, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Alumni
Talk:Bill Harris (Ohio politician)

message: This page is in serious need of a complete rewrite, as it is clearly a promotional/campaign biography. Until either I or someone else can get a new article up, I have tagged the article as POV and in need of wiki-ing. Tytrain (talk) 19:44, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.ohiosenate.gov/bill-harris/fullbio.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 20:21, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --VWBot (talk) 12:20, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has been reverted by a bot to this version to remove User:CAFESDO's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. VWBot (talk) 12:20, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Sampradya Bhajan

message: I thought I could help a little with this article, but there is no discussion at all.  I'm not clear on the neutrality dispute in particular.  I don't see where it takes a stand one way or the other on any controversy at all - I'm not sure what the controversy would be...?
I'll come back and put some context/background into the introduction (it should at least define Bhajan and maybe explain the liturical & historical contexts), but someone more knowledgeable may be needed for the details in the body.  
Curien1000 01:06, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

message: I'm doing POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 20:56, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV Tag
Talk:Xu Simin

message: It's very hard to determine what romanization would be appropriate for his name. He was from Hong Kong, so Cantonese seems likely; but he was pro-Beijing, so Mandarin is equally likely. The SCMP calls him "Xu Simin" https://www.scmp.com/article/607408/veteran-beijing-loyalist-xu-simin-dies-93 , but China Daily calls him "Tsui Sze Man": https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2007-09/11/content_6096419.htm . The article is also inconsistent, alternating between Cantonese and Mandarin readings of his name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:B011:1005:70E3:18A9:3605:F850:246C (talk) 08:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romanization?
Talk:Yoshio Kojima

message: Yoshio's former group, Wake, lists several pieces of information from his height of 180cm to his dislike of having acne scars. The Japanese Wikipedia entry is also much more informative. How acceptable is it for me to simply translate from the Japanese and post it in the English entry? BC Baron cheese 14:47, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think thats a perfectly valid thing to do. KTo288 (talk) 23:25, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Agreed, as long as everything is properly sourced (WP:V). Shinobu (talk) 14:48, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Translating okay?
Talk:Zeke the Wonder Dog

message: I have removed what I consider to be an unwarranted Notability tag, as this article specifically satisfies the main guideline: "it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."  Several of these reliable and independent sources, each of which is a published article with Zeke as the main subject, were included in the article at its creation. In addition, Zeke is notable for a relatively large constituency, i.e. MSU alumni; and while I happen to be an MSU alumnus and a long-time fan of Zeke, my interest in creating this page is not self-promotion nor advertising. Kevin Forsyth 01:16, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I moved the mention of what is purported to be Zeke's official website to an "External links" section, and out of the lead paragraph.  In my opinion, this external site does not satisfy Links normally to be avoided #1, in that it "does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a Featured article." All the information provided at that site already exists within the Wikipedia article. Kevin Forsyth (talk) 01:41, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Official" site
Talk:Bill Perkins (politician)

message: User:Delaywaves recently added Perkins's date of birth to the lead section. The infobox already included his date of birth and listed it as April 18, 1949. I am removing the date of birth altogether because it's unsourced and because a quick online search did not turn up anything that corroborates it. Also, I see two sources that draw it into question. A Feb. 2019 article from the NYP (https://nypost.com/2019/02/01/councilman-bill-perkins-blames-bizarre-behavior-on-health-issues/) lists Perkins's age as 68, which makes a 1949 DOB impossible. Second, this source (https://www.thehistorymakers.org/biography/honorable-bill-perkins), which may or may not be reliable, recites a 1944 date of birth. Does anyone have a source that would clear up this confusion? Amandil21 (talk) 02:13, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth
Talk:Bruce Dedrick

message: There is no blatant advertising on this page at all.  There are no external links.  It is merely a discussion about an artist from the band Free Design.  Please re-review to determine what criteria has been violated.
:Wikipedia is not a discussion forum. Articles need to be encyclopedic. Dedrick is mentioned at the Free Design article. If there is other verifiable information with third party sources, they can be added to establish notability. This is not a judgment on Dedrick, but the article as it stands is merely fancruft, not an encyclopedia article. Look at some other articles on musicians for formatting and text examples. Freshacconci 01:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Mindfulness (disambiguation)

message: A clean presentation of the Buddhist concept would be aided by a disambiguation page that allowed for other material. DCDuring 01:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needed because of Buddhist "imperialism"

message: The subject of mindfulness is presented rather chaotically in the English Wikipedia.
A thorough re-edit is probably warranted.
Mindfulness has been taken from it´s Buddhist origins and used in Western culture and medicine.
Articles should link:
* Mindfulness to the Eightfold path
* Modern founders and teachers like Nhat Hanh and Jon Kabat-Zinn
* Mindfulness-based therapy like:
** Mindfulness-based cognative therapy
** Mindfulness-based stress reduction
** Acceptance and commitment Therapy: ACT
JHvW (talk) 18:45, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mindfulness-based therapy
Talk:Spartanburg Regional Healthcare System

message: Trying to update the Infobox on this page so that it won't display that the "country" is unknown. So far, unsuccessful. DrSerenity 01:53, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Removed this from the article, seems to be an unnecessary and uncited list of awards. Feel free to add back (with citations) if you see relevant. -TG 13:48, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: SRHS Superlatives
Talk:Doom (2016 video game)

message: http://archive.is/J8O5Y#selection-1509.0-1545.4SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 14:09, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:   The !!!shocking!!! proof of 2016's DOOM being actually written DOOM 

message: I figured this should at least have a passing mention. Sorry I can't do it myself right now. --uKER (talk) 15:24, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incident to be mentioned in the article 

message: Under the "Gameplay" section, the article states: "Many enemies also return from the original game, such as the Revenant, Pinky, Mancubus, and Cyberdemon, with many also redesigned." This is innaccurate, as the Revenant and Mancubus are from Doom II, not the original game. Does this need to be corrected, or is it too insignificant to change? Suspicioussandwich (talk) 13:11, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: very very late, like, just not even in time, but i did it anyway. thought to move the hyperlinks from the next paragraph too but eh cogsan (talk) 15:54, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect demon origins
Talk:List of people from Virginia

message: I am rearranging this article as at the length that it will become with proper maintenance, it needs to be alphabetically arrange, with notation for non natives. MsDivagin 02:54, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: what do you mean notation for non natives ?--ProfPolySci45 (talk) 23:56, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Rearranging
Talk:Lava Man

message: Those headings go way over the POV line. Lot of good content but no encyclopedic. Would do it myself, but don't know enough about US racing. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 17:15, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Headings

message: Seriously, this article need references or it will be gutted. Tigerboy1966  18:58, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Working on it! Jlvsclrk (talk) 06:30, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced
Talk:Parachute Woman

message: There is no written evidence that Brian Jones played electric guitar on this track. There is, however, discussion whether Mick Jagger or Brian Jones played harmonica.
Zapspace (talk) 14:12, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Guitar and harmonica
Talk:Monte Vista Christian School

message: Does anyone else see this? This page just sounds like a poster board for the school's agenda and is completely devoid of actual content and objectivity. (Not to mention the terrible writing present: "classes are also offered as part of the curriculum.[1] and some"..."some?" Some what???? Finish your sentences! Where were you during the first grade?)
"the pain will only be passing-you should survive the process"
Irenicus21 03:35, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The claim to be the first in the world to use the ipad is supported only by an Italian article, based on Apple PR, and as such not a reliable source. 
See http://www.nujournal.com/page/content.detail/id/512977.html for another institution claiming to be the first.
Follow up to above comments:
This is widely known to be true. The article you refer to does not even make mention of them being the first. It also has two typos in the title of the article :) Furthermore they mention that the kids are using them in the principals office (they only have a small amount and plan to order 320 of them soon) and that the school plans to distribute them to teachers in the spring. Monte Vista's pilot program started immediately.
You have extremely selective (biased?) Google search results.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.4.248.199 (talk) 18:39, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ipad claim removed 
Talk:Leslie matrix

message: Has anyone considered expanding this page or adding a page on the Euler-Lotka equation? I was searching for information on the E-L equation and despite finding many references to Euler's work in physics I see none to his fundamental contribution to ecology. 
I'd add some myself but I'm trying to find a reference on how to edit equations in WP! 
thanks
Atyre2 03:48, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Have a look at the Help page on formulas and  How to write a Wikipedia article on Mathematics -- 134.2.62.179 (talk) 14:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

message: School is doing a project on it. im at hs so we might see some massive vandlisimFirl21 (talk) 15:02, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  LOCK THIS PAGE NOW
Talk:Ahimsa in Jainism

message: The article title uses the "Ahimsa" spelling, and the main article in Wikipedia is also "Ahimsa".
I noticed that the lede spells it "Ahinsa", though.  Is there a reason it is spelled that way?  Should it be changed to "Ahimsa"?
— 135.180.216.150 (talk) 21:41, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of Ahinsa vs. Ahimsa
Talk:Liuzhou

message: Why were two sentences deleted without comment in these edits? Badagnani (talk) 08:16, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Apologies for the lack of comments. The sentences were removed because Liuzhou coffins were not made of Nanmu. The information was inaccurate. I have re-edited to give a cited explanation of the wood types. Liuzhou (talk) 06:05, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletions

message: I just removed a long section of tourist information which was clearly inappropriate, not only for it's length but for the detail (opening times, phone numbers, bus details), as specified in WP:NOTTRAVEL. After removing it I did a quick search and it further seems to be copyright material, copied from  here, so could not be used even on travel related wikimedia projects. --JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 00:12, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tourist information 

message: A prior version of Hefei Luogang International Airport might have more information as well, but as the previous editor confused Liuzhou, Luzhou, and Hefei into one location, I had no idea what should go where prior to someone rechecking the original sources. — LlywelynII 17:33, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Alleged videos of occupation and recovery here. — LlywelynII 17:35, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Liuchow Airfield

message: Maybe there should be mention of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luosifen - the wildly popular noodles that originated in Liuzhou.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.114.92.25 (talk) 02:14, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noodles 

message: To add to the header of the article: what does it border? 173.88.241.33 (talk) 17:18, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article
File talk:John Edwards Pittsburgh 2007.jpg

message: Holy crap someone remind me to nom for delist in a few months. I can't believe I let this scrape through without a scathing criticism. --⁪frotht 04:17, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a Livestrong wristband, yes. In fact, this picture is in that article. --Herald Alberich (talk) 06:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

text: *Actually looks up Wriststrong* Oh. No, it's not. --Herald Alberich (talk) 06:44, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:San Francisquito Creek

message: The History section focuses on random items relating to the Ohlones, Spanish explorers, and so on. The creek itself is barely mentioned. Instead, I suggest reworking the material to summarize the various chronological actions and events that are discussed in the subsequent sections. jxm (talk) 22:13, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevant history?
Talk:Successor function

message: Currently, this redirects to an article that references the Successor Function, but doesn't even hint at its meaning.  I actually got here trying to figure out what it was.  The Primitive Recursive Function article explicitly defines it, so I'm redirecting there. -Bigmantonyd 04:31, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

message: I am trying to teach myself more math stuff, specifically as it relates to lambda calculus and Church Numerals. But I am having trouble because a lot of these articles are very partial in their explanation. For instance this: " 5 + 2 = 5 + S(1) = S(5 + 1) = S(5 + S(0)) = S(S(5 + 0)) = S(S(5)) = S(6) = 7." from the article has absolutely no explanation. What is up with this notation system? Why is it like this? What is going on and what does it mean? These things should be better explained. Thedonquixotic (talk) 22:16, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The explanations are given before in the article. "S" denotes the successor function, so e.g. S(1)=2, this should explain the first equation in the chain. m+S(n)=S(m+n) is the second part of the recursive definition of addition ("+") in terms of successor ("S"), applied to m=5 and n=1, this should explain the second equation in the chain. And so on. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:38, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  There needs to be more full explanation of these concepts and their notation 

message: 212.75.236.148 (talk) 18:45, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does this really need to be a separate article from [[Increment and decrement operators|this]]?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Richard Wagner/Archive 2

message: I have now also assessed :Category: Compositions by Richard Wagner. I have rated them all as stubs. The only one I had any doubts about was the Wesendonck Lieder. Perhaps you would like to check what I have done? In most cases there wasn't much to assess, but I thought to would be best to cover all the articles in the Wagner categories. -- Kleinzach 05:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As I've now caught GT up, I'll look at the lieder tomorrow rather than Lohengrin. Obviously we haven't got a marking scheme for this. Has anybody discussed assessment with WP:CM? If anyone should develop markign schemes for song cycles, it should be them. --Peter cohen 10:09, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, no let's not involve other projects! It would be too complicated and it's only one page after all! There are plenty of precedents for different projects to work in parrallel to each other - they can read each other's assessments anyway. -- Kleinzach 10:34, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Before starting the Ring operas, I am assessing Der Ring des Nibelungen: Composition of the text and Der Ring des Nibelungen: Composition of the music. (Incidentlly these lack pictures but otherwise IMO would be good candidates for GA.) -- Kleinzach 10:44, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I've used what I can of the opera scheme and am marking out of 80. I've gone for Start on the lieder and really think it won't be too much work for someone with the right books to get it to B and thinking about GA.--Peter cohen 11:13, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article assessment 6: [[:Category: Compositions by Richard Wagner|Compositions by Richard Wagner]]
Talk:LeSean McCoy

message: Good  luck with your efforts to go GA. Checkingfax (talk) 02:22, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good luck  with the Great Article 

message: If the trade isn't finalized till the 10th people will keep editing it and or vandalizing it. Semi lock would prevent this. Buffaboy (talk) 00:14, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Already done by Gfoley4. Natg 19 (talk) 00:23, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Great. --Buffaboy (talk) 01:23, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh, I saw the news on twitter and I waited for someone to change his team to the Bills then immediately protected it! —GFOLEY FOUR!— 21:18, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

text: Why not just say "A trade was reported on ESPN but is unsubstantiated at this time." 67.83.41.135 (talk) 04:24, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi lock it 

message: https://twitter.com/PHLEaglesNation/status/1443592528880615425
Eagles Nation (1-2)
@PHLEaglesNation
LeSean McCoy is retiring, and signing a one-day contract to do it as a member of the team
THANK YOU SHADY 
@CutonDime25
I don't know the proper protcol to change the page. But this should probably be added.
:So regarding this, it said he will retire as an Eagle on a one day contract. But it will happen on October 1 (tomorrow as I'm writing this). I just checked the Eagles Instagram and that's what the caption said about the retirement. So he's still technically a free agent until the Eagles basically announce it tomorrow. Swagging (talk) 23:18, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retirement
Talk:Lauren Cohen

message: Although I'd hate to slap  tag on the article or nominate it for deletion, I've been unable to find independent non-trivial coverage on the man using google and I'm afraid the sources cited by the article right now are not enough to establish notability. If notability is not established, I'll have to nominate this for deletion.--Carabinieri 00:12, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur; self-written resume by all appearances. --LeyteWolfer 02:26, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not self-written.  I explain my relationship with bio subject in AfD discussion.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM)  19:16, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Dr. Cohen (a former classmate of mine) informs me that he was born on July 6, 1979 in Athens, PA.  I do not have a WP:RS from the public domain for this content.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:58, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:PRIMARY]] content excluded
Talk:Duilio Arigoni

message: I created this article on 2007/09/19. You can make contributions by adding relevant information. RS1900 04:52, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duilio Arigoni 
Talk:Prinsjesdag

message: Princelings? what about young princes? Arthurian Legend 04:59, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The current "princes" is a wrong translation. Prinsjes means little princes. Taketa (talk) 15:47, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it means prince, not princes. Also it does not mean little. It is a contraction between prince and day, which looks like little prince, but it is prince's day. I've change the entry. --80.101.163.191 (talk) 15:22, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Princeling