Talk:Jackalope

message: What'cha all think? I've pretty much run out of ammo. Montanabw fixed that Huichol thing that's been bugging me since Day One and a bunch of other things too. I'll probably see more little glitches and baggy prose tomorrow, but I think I'm basically done. What's still missing, confused, wrongheaded, or messed up, or is everything approximately A-OK? Finetooth (talk) 05:21, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we are ready for the GAN. I'll help birddog it and if I see any wikignoming edits I can do along the way, I'll help there too.  It has been hilarious and fun to have happen! Montanabw(talk) 23:35, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Super! I hope to do this tomorrow, February 7. Finetooth (talk) 04:13, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Time for a run at GA?

message: A Jackalope does NOT have antelope horns;  it has Deer antlers, mostly whitetail type and only 2 points on each side! Please change the descripton.--Wyocop (talk) 19:23, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Amortias (T)(C) 19:55, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the existing article makes clear that although the imaginary creature is a combination of antelope and rabbit, the taxidermist jackalopes that you can buy in a store or by mail order are, as you say, made with deer horns. Could you point out where in the article you see a problem? Which section, which sentences? Finetooth (talk) 20:40, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 April 2015 

message: The article says a Jackalope has antelope horns. That is not the case the Jackalope has deer antlers, usualy 2 points on a side,, please change the statement. thanks in advance JohnB End request 184.167.163.76 (talk) 13:47, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: - this has been requested before and the answers are the same as the thread from April 6, 2015 MarnetteD|Talk 16:29, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 May 2015 

message: This article's interwiki link for Russian incorrectly points to a template in ruwiki, while the related wikidata item (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q908923) has correct data for :ru:Рогатый заяц. What is the reason? Fedor Babkin (talk) 06:00, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I thought I would reply so that you know someone is listening, but interwiki links are something I know nothing about. Where is the interwiki link you refer to? I followed your link to the wikidata page and looked at that setup. That doesn't help with the other one, though. Could you make the correction? If so, that would be fine with me. Finetooth (talk) 20:10, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly  can help, he understands wikidata.  Montanabw(talk) 00:05, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks , I have some experience with wikidata, but this case is beyond my capacities. Let's wait for a wizard to come and make the correction. --Fedor Babkin (talk) 05:25, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  . The interwiki link was specified directly in the infobox template code. Therefore, this links was shown in all articles that use this template. --Michgrig (talk) 07:00, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks . Does that solve the problem, ? Finetooth (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes it does. --Fedor Babkin (talk) 17:31, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ru interwiki 

message: The article used to feature mentions of jackalopes portrayed with pheasant tails and hind legs. although no longer common, there was no reason for this information to be deleted as this is a still relevant piece of information. why was this deleted from the article? i feel it needs to be returned because it is a little known fact that this interpretation does exist, and is not just an incomplete wopertinger or antlered skvader.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.120.253.58 (talk) 16:34, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: We can certainly add that if you have a reliable source to support the claim. Are you sure you are not thinking of the Wolpertinger? Finetooth (talk) 20:55, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pheasant parts 

message: Went through there, got jackalope photos:    Fun!  (Also got my non-resident jackalope license! LOL!)  Montanabw(talk) 20:29, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Douglas, Wyo 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jackalope. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150128112559/http://www.gamematics.net/guild-wars-2-impressions/ to http://www.gamematics.net/guild-wars-2-impressions/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:57, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jackalope. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140330194001/http://www.pixar.com/short_films/Theatrical-Shorts/Boundin' to http://www.pixar.com/short_films/Theatrical-Shorts/Boundin%27
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150201041400/http://nahlodessa.pointstreaksites.com/view/nahlodessa/odessa-jackalopes-hockey-1 to http://nahlodessa.pointstreaksites.com/view/nahlodessa/odessa-jackalopes-hockey-1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:24, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:53, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion