Talk:European Medicines Agency

message: 78.141.41.99 (talk) 16:36, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

message: :Image:EMEA logo.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 07:39, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:EMEA logo.svg

message: The image :Image:City of London Arms.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:50, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:City of London Arms.png

message: What's the rationale behind linking Frances Oldham Kelsey in the See also section? →Alfie±Talk 23:46, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed, since no response for one month. →Alfie±Talk 20:17, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frances Oldham Kelsey 

message: The EMA's website url for searching for a drug has become more complex. For the likes of  and , I have created a subtemplate to provide the url for links - see . David Ruben  Talk  15:40, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Drug search markup

message: A new EMA organisational structure was announced on 16 September 2013. There are four new Divisions dealing with human medicines: Human Medicines Research and Development Support, Human Medicines Evaluation, Procedure Management and Business Support, Inspections and Human Medicines Pharmacovigilance. So the description in 'Operations' could do with updating as it is a bit out of date: ["The Secretariat is organised into five units: Directorate, Human Medicines Development and Evaluation, Patient Health Protection, Veterinary Medicines and Product Data Management, Information and Communications Technology and Administration"]. 
Full details are on the EMA website: 
http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/about_us/general/general_content_000112.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac0580028c2c
EMA webteam (talk) 17:15, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: New EMA structure

message: Can someone sort out the end of Brexit section? It's being used as a dumping ground for irrelevant 'reports' or random/non citations to promote specific country applications for the EMA relocation. The EMA has carried out an internal preference audit but the countries were anonymized (although that hasn't stopped people speculating). I strongly suggest we cut out the Copenhagen paragraph (no citation save a Danish blog or newspaper of some kind where I couldn't find the original report, I did find a CRA report on the EFPIA site, but it doesn't go into country applications) and the absurd Italy section. 
I've seen a report suggesting Amsterdam doing the rounds as well. We should keep clear of all of these, the EU will decide, period.
see,
http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/news_and_events/general/general_content_001707.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac0580a809a7  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carba (talk • contribs) 13:14, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Very much supported. An encyclopedia speculating in advance of the outcome of political decisions loses in my view credibility. In particular the bullshit on the endocannabinoid system should be removed. I lack the time to do it myself right now, but maybe later if no one else can have mercy on it.Axel Fredrik (talk) 20:19, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brexit 

message: Swedish politicians voted anonymously against Denmark as the place of relocation of EMA after Brexit. Scandinavic countries considered this a treason against Denmark in particular and Scandinavia as a unity. According to international experts, Sweden voted against its own interests; a relocation to Denmark would mean more jobs for South Sweden as well — both Sweden and Denmark has plans of making the Copenhagen region a "Medicon Valley". Swedish politicians used harsh tones against the Swedish anti-Denmark voters and the government has started a research on how this treason could happen. It was very big in Scandinavian media, so it's a sentence worth in the Wiki article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.188.108.221 (talk) 14:38, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swedish treason 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on European Medicines Agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100601053816/http://www.ema.europa.eu/pdfs/general/direct/74766509en.pdf to http://www.ema.europa.eu/pdfs/general/direct/74766509en.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091225201855/http://www.ema.europa.eu/htms/general/direct/visual_identity.htm to http://www.ema.europa.eu/htms/general/direct/visual_identity.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:06, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Could better sources, and if possible also English ones, be found to support this material?  Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 01:20, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest