lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cimișlia

message: I've done what I can on this. There are a few phrases toward the bottom that I couldn't translate. I've italicized them. If you can, please do. -- Jmabel | Talk 19:30, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)
Bogdan got most of it. One remaining phrase: "cu hiparioni de tip turolian". -- Jmabel | Talk 17:54, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)
:  Hipparion fauna of Turolian type: google acually finds a link with this expression :-) Bogdan | Talk 20:45, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: The following massive dump of unwikified Romanian-language material, with no cited source, was added by User:Bebelush 18 April 2005. It was also pasted into the article itself, where I have deleted it. Expressions like "Elevii nostri" and "Ne bucuram mult" make me suspect that this may be copyrighted material. Would a native Romanian speaker please have a look? And I'll drop a note at User talk:Bebelush. -- Jmabel | Talk 05:59, Apr 19, 2005 (UTC)
 In Cimislia activeaza 5 institutii prescolare:
   Gradinita "Ghiocel" - 180 de copii
   Gradinita "Randunica" - 140 de copii
   Gradinita "Fat-Frumos" - 85 de copii
   Gradinita "Viorica" - 25 de copii
   Gradinita "Scufita Rosie" - 50 copii
    Gradinita"Foisor"-75 copii  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.138.33.242 (talk) 19:52, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you hold the copyright, that much is good. If you want to place this material in Wikipedia, it has to be rewritten from neutral point of view; and if you want to place it here in the English Wikipedia it will have to be in English. You can probably more quickly prepare it in Romanian for the Romanian Wikipedia. - Jmabel | Talk 03:41, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Info dump
Talk:Parody advertisement

message: After talking about Energizer and the Energizer Bunny, it says "In an ironic twist, in 1991, Eveready Battery Company...".
Are Everready and Energizer related then? Or is this a mistake?
- Jax
:Energizer used to be known as Eveready Battery Company, which Energizer brand batteries being made by them but then later they where sold and their name was later changed to Energizer Holdings. See  --Cab88 01:06, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Energizer vs. Eveready

message: What about the "Ineligible Beer" commercials with the referee calls? I think it was Budweiser who did it, replacing Miller Lite with Bud Lite. Miller responded with their version where, after having their beer replaced, the drinkers chased the refs because they "didn't want that beer".
===Simpsons v. Burger King===
This "suing" does not seem to exist. Burger King made several legitimate Simpsons commercials, and a Google Search turns up nothing. The section also has no source. If no one has an objection, I will remove this. --Jedravent 23:02, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ineligilbe Beer

message: This "suing" does not seem to exist. Burger King made several legitimate Simpsons commercials, and a Google Search turns up nothing. The section also has no source. If no one has an objection, I will remove this. --Jedravent 23:02, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Simpsons v. Burger King
Talk:DVI (disambiguation)

message: Apparently, the move is being blocked because someone edited the redirect. DVI currently redirects to Digital Visual Interface, but it seems that the disambiguation page would go better there. “alerante” 19:52, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[DVI (disambiguation)]] &rarr; [[DVI]]

message: I am in favour of the primary meaning being Digital Visual Interface, and have promoted to the top. I would be in favour of moving this back, and having a redirect as primary. As there's debate above (in agreement) and history, I want to gain consensus first... Widefox; talk 12:27, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No opposition, so just like VGA, making this the primary meaning Widefox; talk 14:12, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move against consensus above

message: DVI is also Disaster Victim Identification - we need a page on that ... http://www.interpol.int/INTERPOL-expertise/Forensics/DVI  David Thrale (talk) 23:59, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Disaster Victim Identification
Talk:Cofradía, Cortés

message: Placed in the wrong group of language links. They do not refer to the Honduras Cortés department place name that is documented by this article. The language links refer to a religious notion, Cofradía, 
:como término general universal, designa diferentes tipos de cosas, como hermandad, gremio, compañía, unión o reunión de individuos.
It appears now that the Spanish version links to Confraternity. I couldn't find any equivalent article in the Spanish Wikipeda for this one (village of Cofradía in Cortés).--Catrachos (talk) 20:48, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanish language link (under Languages) not correct 

message: As of March 2017 the inhabitants were trying to convert the village classification to the 299th municipality Honduras and 13th of Cortés (Quieren convertir a Cofradía en el municipio 13 de Cortés):
:Esa situación ha llevado a un grupo de pobladores a continuar con un proyecto que estaba engavetado y es el de convertir a la Villa de Cofradía en el municipio 299 de Honduras. Conformaron un comité pro municipio de Cofradía que ha iniciado una serie de actividades para llamar la atención de la realidad de la Villa y la necesidad de ser el municipio 299 de Honduras y el 13 del departamento de Cortés.'
The article summarizes data as of that date:
:En la parte baja o urbana del sector hay 64 colonias con una población de 195,000 habitantes sin contar con la población rural en la parte del El Meredon, que corresponde a Cofradía y que tiene más de 62 aldeas y caseríos. No hay datos del número de habitantes en este sector.
--Catrachos (talk) 20:39, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  2001 Demographics appear out of date
Talk:The Beiderbecke Affair

message: Removed as POV:
:[T]he series have a warm feel, like a favourite old cardigan, which belies the sharpness of the writing.
Lee M 20:09, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This links to Cub Scouts (Boy Scouts of America)- I don't think this is correct. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 02:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cubs 

message: Is the text in the entry copy/pasted from the IMDB entry synopsis, or is it the other way around?
How can one tell? 203.211.72.105 (talk) 08:09, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like much of it was copied from the IMDb plot summary. But I wrote that IMDb plot summary and I have no objection to it being used here as well -- SteveCrook (talk) 05:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied entry? 

message: Are they really brothers (siblings)? Or are they just "brothers" in the sense of "All men are my brothers"? Is it right to call their enterprise a "family business"? -- SteveCrook (talk) 07:32, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big Al & Little Norm 

message: A recent change to the article pointed out to me the description of Big Al as neurotic. Neurotic? Eccentric, anti-authoritarian, yes and also many other things. But I don't see him as neurotic -- SteveCrook (talk) 21:29, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Big Al neurotic? 
Talk:John Swartzwelder

message: You know, it would be fascinating if this were true:
:John Swartzwelder is pseudonym used by writers of the animated television series The Simpsons. Other writers of the show have created a "John Swartzwelder" character, a long-haired, potbellied chap with a moustache, which has been seen in a few episodes of the show.
but as far as I know it isn't, so I've removed it. sjorford:// 20:19, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That shouldn't be too hard to do. Krupo 17:45, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

text: This it? Zagalejo 07:28, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What needs to be updated?  00:17, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I placed that there a while ago because the article said nothing about the Season 9 commentary.  I've removed it. Zagalejo 02:26, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update? 
Talk:Demographics of Indonesia

message: Can the writer or anybody help? I'm now translating this article into traditional Chinese. We do have a Chinese version so far, but I think it would be appropriate to have the whole contents shared with people who care to know. Thanks in advance for your kind attention.ThomasYehYeh (talk) 07:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to citation for this section "Fertility rate and aging population (by province)" has been permanently dead
Talk:Mantle (mollusc)

message: Are there any differences to be explained about mantles of, say, snails and squids? To my uneducated view, I would expect some. Mikkalai 20:40, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Out of curiosity--What does the picture of an octopus have to do with the article? wouldn't a diagram of the mantle be better?69.249.20.210 (talk) 20:07, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Firstly, it is a squid (ten legs) not an octopus (eight legs) ;-). Secondly, squids are typically 75% mantle (including viscera) and 25% head/legs. Lycaon (talk) 11:10, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't count the legs. :P. I assumed it was an octopus from the coloring. And I still think that people who don't know that (and who are dumb enough not to read the talk pages) would get a bit confused.69.249.20.210 (talk) 02:09, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Battle of Chaffin's Farm

message: Text of the article was obtained from public domain site. - Darwinek 22:55, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You should cite it specifically in ==References==. Hal Jespersen 16:26, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Corpus Juris

message: I removed some paragraphs making wild claims about habeas corpus and other rights. Since these rights are constitutional or treaty guarantees in all EU countries, the claims are incomprehensible. David.Monniaux 21:26, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: I merged this with Corpus juris and created a redirect.  --Eastlaw 07:26, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:The Dirty Fork

message: Should be merged with "the Restaurant sketch" 70.51.122.7 05:49, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm inclined to agree. Lokicarbis 00:58, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I also agree. The two articles are distinction without a difference. Lou Sander 05:22, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger?

message: Is there some reason the video wasn't up or did no one just get around to it?--Mr.Brownstone 20:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone placed a link to YouTube, i replaced it with another YouTube link of the sketch but with higher quality BritBoy 21:02, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: video

message: I removed the deletion notice because it appeared to me to be an arbitrary notice placed on several Monty Python sketches. While its true that this skit and several others can not be absolutely defined as notable, I would argue that was actually the nature of Monty Python. Some of the funniest bits of that show were not the sketches which are commonly known, such as Spam but really the segue pieces. I am therefore removing the deletion notice on the grounds that it is arbitrary, and that Wikipedia provides an excellent repository for showcasing Monty Python skits. There are after all 100s of Monty Python Skits and only a handful that have been made into articles in Wikipedia.--10stone5 20:20, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: deletion notice

message: I'm removing the deletion notice again because of the arbitrary nature in which these articles are being cited for deletion. One individual is making the call on what should or should not be deleted on some 10 or so Monty Python articles.--10stone5 20:31, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: again, removal of deletion notice
Talk:25924 Douglasadams

message: IS this really a stub, or just a very small but valid entry.  I would suggest the latter. Rich Farmbrough 21:38, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post 

message: As of 2017, 25924 Douglasadams has been rewritten and brought to a start level. Rfassbind – talk 22:03, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 2017
Category talk:Bible chapters

message: What the heck is the purpose of having encyclopedia articles on individual chapters of the Bible? Is the goal to produce a chapter by chapter, verse by verse commentary?!? Seems impossible to do from a NPOV, but I'd love to hear what's really intended here. Thanks. Wesley 21:40, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Why would it be impossible to do NPOV? Can we write articles on LeVey's Satanic Bible, Homer's Odyssey and other religious works NPOV - if so, we can do this. --Oldak Quill 00:48, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Advanced modular arithmetic theory

message: Linas wrote in the article:
:The first encyclopedia entry on modular arithmetic was written by Euclid, in Book 7 of Euclid's Elements.
Now, was it encyclopedia what Euclid wrote? The Euclid's Elements page says it was a mathematical treatise, aka, an Abramowitz and Stegun before its time. Oleg Alexandrov 22:11, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes well, encyclopedia is an 18th century Enlightnment concept, so, by definition, anything written before that time cannot technically be called an encyclopedia.  On the other hand, the Elements, along with Aristotle's works and Pliny's History, come close to what in modern times would be called an "encyclopedia".  So I think the usage is entirely approriate. A&S is an excellent reference work, but its neither encylopeadic nor is it a treatise. linas 00:17, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Now we are getting into fine points about what an encyclopedia is, and whether Euclid wrote about modular arithmetic or ordinary arithmetic. Thus, never mind. Could you check the talk page of Fixed point theorems in infinite-dimensional spaces? I have a question there about the paragaph you inserted. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov 02:16, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Wikipedia talk:Portal/Guidelines/Archive 6

message: User:Czar asked: As for those advocating for portal consolidation, where would y'all draw the line between major and minor portals? czar 00:52, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Threshold for worth keeping 

message: See Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#RfC about marking the Featured portals process as "historical". BencherliteTalk 19:38, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Did this conversation continue elsewhere? Are we looking at deprecating portals altogether? I see a lot of footdragging, ostensibly in acknowledgment of the work that was once put into these, but there does appear to be a clear movement towards (or at least in baby steps towards) their wholesale removal czar 07:14, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: , that was the extent of the discussion about closing down the featured portal process and it was thereafter marked as historical (with no subsequent complaints). What if anything should happen to the portal namespace is another issue. BencherliteTalk 11:07, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  I was referring to this part of the close:  and where any subsequent discussion has taken place. czar 15:47, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC on marking the featured portal process as historical 

message: While looking at one example, one Portal which is pretty significant and should not be left abandoned and stale, is Chemistry.
: Portal:Chemistry Featured portal candidate 30 November 2006
: Chemistry FA candidate, not promoted 16 March 2007.  (Appear to me to be begging to be lifted to FA level)
Should Portals contain their own unique attribution history, edit history, style and unique content?  Or should portals be technically ties to the articles they showcase?  For example...
Should Portal:Chemistry/Intro be a transclusion of the lede of Chemistry?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That looks like a reasonable proposal to me. Have you suggested this on the relevant project? If it is inactive I would suggest be bold and do it. Cheers,
· · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 10:40, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portal text, transclusions of article ledes? 

message: Relevant RfC Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:24, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ending the system of portals 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at  Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Portals#RfC: Adopt as a MoS guideline . - Evad37 [talk] 03:00, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Portals#RfC: Adopt as a MoS guideline]]
Talk:Endocytosis

message: As far as I know, endocytosis and phagocytosis are two separated ways of intake of matter, not the one being the form of another. Phagocytosis is active, mediated by pseudopodia, while endocytosis is not. --Eleassar777 23:35, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Endocytosis vs phagocytosis

message: Hm...I'm confused again. Acording to a As-level textbook, "Biology 1" endorsed by OCR, phagocytosis is only restricted to phagocyte engulfing a pathogen. Other cells "eating" other materials are referred as endocytosis. Why is that? Cherubfish 17:12, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: UK standards?

message: Also i'm not sure (being a relatively new student) but isn't it also true that exo and endocytosis happen by fairly unconnected mechanisms? So it isn't really true to call them opposites. -Unknown
:The molecular mechanisms that control endo and exocytosis can indeed be different. However here what is meant is that the function of endocytosis is the opposite of that of exocytosis. -Unknown  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.36.64.135 (talk) 13:37, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Endo/Excocytosis
Talk:Andrew Reed (police officer)

message: Don't know what "KNT" means.  Also there are an awful lot of notable "Andrew Reed"s, this wil have to become a disambig page at some point.Rich Farmbrough 23:47, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Occupations entry from Reed's form for the 1911 Census confirms the "K.C.B.; C.V.O.; L.L.D." part of this biography. Wbakker2 (talk) 20:50, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Information from the 1911 Census of Ireland
Talk:Glenbrook South High School

message: Has anyone noticed that this article is basically Glenbrook North High School, except for "Notable mentions and events", with North changed to South.
Hi there, Superdosh. I'm not exactly sure of the procedure for verifying and authorizing additions to Wikipedia articles, but I can provide some insight into Mr. Beyrak's credentials. I'm a Glenbrook South alum who graduated the same year as Ilya (2003, hardly long enough ago for him to become a "Sucessful International Entrepreneur" of anything), and I'm 99% sure that he added his own name onto this Wikipedia article to feed his ego. The guy runs a website where you can buy RAM, which isn't exactly an encyclopedia-worthy accomplishment. I love Glenbrook South and I'm proud of its history and the accomplishments of many of its alumni; even so, this article obviously cannot list every sucessful businessperson, politician, artist or ahtlete who has graduated from that school. The list of notable alumni in this Wikipedia entry needs to be reserved for those graduates who have become exceptionally sucessful, influential- even infamous, if that situation were to arise. What it cannot be is a forum for self-serving former students to post their résumés.
:Kyle Gyondla
:Glenbrook South High School, Class of 2003
:University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Class of 2007
:18:27, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Anyone?
Talk:Mark White (Texas politician)

message: Where can we reach Governor Mark White right now?  We want to speak with him.  thanks!
Art Thornton—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.148.77.147 (talk) 23:52, 5 February 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Bill Eastland 21:32, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of appointment as Secretary of State 

message: Someone should mention that he appointed Myra McDaniel as Secretary of State.  She was the first African American female to serve that office in TX. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.190.134.148 (talk) 05:40, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Myra McDaniel 

message: Although White served in the army during the Vietnam War era, no reliable sources found as of yet state that he served in Vietnam. Accordingly, :Category:American military personnel of the Vietnam War was removed from the article for now until a reliable ref is found. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 11:55, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Vietnam War service
Talk:List of Peruvian steam frigates

message: This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of Peruvian steam frigates.  The result was to keep it.  dbenbenn | talk 23:55, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: So do i say. — Daniel FR 17:34, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: This "article" is a bad joke.

message: Surely, we don't need to expand the talk page, do we? --RoySmith 17:03, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion? 

message: So do i say. — Daniel FR 11:20, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: This "article" is '''still''' a bad joke.

message: So do i say. — Daniel FR 21:43, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Bad" in "Bad joke" means it's not funny!
Talk:Sticklepath

message: Valid topic but right now it's a copyvio. Please re-write or else it'll get the copyvio tag. --Woohookitty 00:02, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Where has it been copied from? Biscuittin (talk) 20:12, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The original version of this article was a cut'n'paste job from http://south-zeal.com/bv/page063.html, which appears to claim (c) 2004. Even the sourcing to two books/leaflets was copied verbatim. Although it's possible that our IP editor was the same person who wrote the south-zeal.com pages, we couldn't be sure of this now even if he reappears (it was a dynamic IP address), so I've reduced this to a stub, pending a rewrite. The other 13 Jan 2005 contribs from 82.153.65.137 were presumably also copyvios - to be investigated.  —SMALLJIM  17:13, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think this section may be incorrect. Hugh de Courtenay was not born until 1248 so how could he have married in 1242?  Biscuittin (talk) 20:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Courtenay family