lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jeff Passan

message: Seriously, can someone please nominate this article for deletion? There is zero reference for any awards actually won, I removed the one reference since it wasn't to him winning an award, it was a reference for coming in 5th, which doesn't even get someone an invite to the awards dinner. Also, being quoted by other sports writers is not anything that makes someone notable.
Just because someone is employed by a place like Yahoo, doesn't make them notable, while I would say he could be mentioned as an employee or talked about in reference to the book he was mildly a part of, but he does not deserve his own article here. While I cannot reference it, it is known that he was only included on the book as a professional favor by Wetzel because they are co-workers and Yahoo asked Wetzel to try to include him in order to try to up the status of Yahoo writers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.20.233.173 (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Yeybox (talk) 19:31, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Media Culture -BN
Talk:Craft Northern Ireland

message: Craft NI is a not-for-profit, devlopment agency for craft in NI. It is important that this organisation is inserted into wikipedia, set up in 2005, it is the first and only organisation to support craftspeople on a regional basis in Northern Ireland. It will contribute to knowledge about craft and northern ireland.
People can reference the organisation as part of knowledge on culture in Northern Ireland. Other similar organisation that are referenced on Wikipedia are:
Arts Council of Northern Ireland,
Belfast Exposed Gallery,
Audiences NI
:Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Please see WP:ORG and provide sources to establish the subject's notability. Of course, the need for sources goes beyond notability. Information added to an article must be verifiable, and facts included must be attributed to a reliable source. Thanks. --Evb-wiki (talk) 13:39, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Enron International

message: May I suggest that this page get merged with a main Enron article of some sort. Not fully sure it needs to be its own article and could quite easily be covered I think under Subsidiaries or something (not a great head for business here sorry). Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:35, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. This article is fairly useless. There are multiple articles dealing with the Enron meltdown and fraud, but none do it justice, in my opinion. There should be consolidation and expansion perhaps reserved to only one article. Activist (talk) 10:10, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Porters Pass

message: I just removed the claim that this is the third highest point on New Zealand's State Highway network, because this seems to be untrue: the North Island's Desert Road is higher (1071 m, on SH 1), as are Lindis Pass (971 m, on SH 8) and the Homer Tunnel (945 m, on SH 94). So at 939 m, Porter Pass is at best fourth. This sort of claim should be sourced. --Avenue (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: And during the period that it was a State Highway, the Crown Range summit was highest of the lot. The fascinating thing is that despite Australia being a flat and relatively mountainless place, they have towns at 1100 metres in the Blue Mountains. dramatic (talk) 08:43, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Not the third highest NZ highway

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Porters Pass with Big Ben Range, Torlesse Range, New Zealand.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for March 25, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-03-25. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:50, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Danseys Pass

message: I'm currently going through Wikidata entries for (mostly) localities in Otago to complete them by adding coordinates, the district in which it is located, and the NZ Gazetteer ID number if any of those are missing. Once I had completed the Wikidata entries, I imported them into Google Earth (where I have boundaries for territorial authorities and regions). It turns out that many of the entries located in the Waitaki District are wrong and this is one of them. The Waitaki District straddles two regions (Canterbury and Otago). Most of the localities within Waitaki District that are in Canterbury were recorded as being in the Otago Region. What may have added to the confusion is that the regional boundary was traditionally the Waitaki River. Yet another complication is that LINZ has "survey districts" and the vast majority of Waitaki District (with the exception of Lake Ōhau) falls into their Otago district.
In the case of Danseys Pass, the boundary between Waitaki and Central Otago districts go across the pass. Whilst the process is precise, it doesn't lend itself for normal referencing. Schwede66 20:02, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Geography
Talk:Argentine Regional Workers' Federation

message: Last paragraph:
The article claims that the FORA V was dissolved, yet it still exists. This should be clarified. Oblivioid (talk) 23:46, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article says that it was FORA who could not afford sending a delegate to London, but in the meeting's article it says it was CORA. --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 02:02, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which was it?
Talk:Mark Handley

message: Hey i would love to read the original Theaterplay ! And i was wondering of there is a translated Version in German ?
👋🏻❤️ 2A01:598:B977:93CF:C3C:9C3A:2E22:E6EE (talk) 10:37, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where can i get the Play Idioglossia from Mark Handley?
Talk:Christopher Pelling

message: A search on Google Scholar shows Pelling's works widely referenced with his two key books both cited in 15 sources. I have now added TV & Radio appearences. Anyone any suggestions on how to change the page to clarify Pelling's notability?--Ashley VH (talk) 14:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Danish Football Player of the Year

message: On dbu.dk it is Rommedahl http://www.dbu.dk/page.aspx?id=317 
Ehr... how do we explain this: http://www.uefa.com/competitions/ucl/news/kind=1/newsid=643585.html ?--Sorensen ru (talk) 14:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Rommedahl has been awarded by the Danish Football Association (DBU), while Agger was awarded by the Danish Professional Footballers' Association. As this page uses DBU as a source, Rommedahl is the person to list. And under no circumstances should any players be listed as 2008 winners, that's about a year early.. Poulsen (talk) 20:39, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Agger or Rommedahl
Talk:Salamanca (Congress of Deputies constituency)

message: Falling electorate is perfectly fine, see here, here in a British parliamentary document, or books such as J. Vernon, Politics and the People: A Study in English Political Culture, c. 1815-1867 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 32-45. Valenciano (talk) 19:48, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Touché Buster Seven Talk 20:48, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Monivong Boulevard

message: ... is actually somewhere on Mao Tse Toung or Kampuchea Kraom blvds, not Monivong. I shall get off my arse and take some real photographs of the road - tomorrow!. Cheers, Paxse (talk) 11:30, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think that photo... 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI!  04:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Church of God Preparing for the Kingdom of God

message: Okay, this is how it goes.
I came across some COG-PKG articles.
I checked Wikipedia for general information on PKG. Didn't exist.
The PKG's mother-church did, so, all things being relevant, I started this page.
It is in fact different from the Worldwide Church of God, as the PKG almost appears to claim that the WCG is defunct in some way.
I'm lazy and don't have much spare time, so I figured I'd try to get the ball rolling.
Thanks much.
--TheDefiniteArticle (talk) 14:28, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've just finished major cleanup of this article—updated, added citations, fixed grammar and link errors, generally copyedited. Done for now; let me know if I made any serious errors. Michaelmas1957 04:32, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I also intend to keep updating it to reflect new developments (seeing as his tax evasion case is now beginning, and this is the year he has described as the end times). Michaelmas1957 22:19, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finished cleanup 

message: Would Someone Explain about a Prediction Withdrawl that he Did?T-Nuggett (talk) 02:45, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Withdrawl Prediction 

message: Why call it "Great Disappointment of 2019", if June 9th is still in the future? --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 14:47, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyway, noone answered and we are almost on it, so... --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 12:21, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joke?
Talk:American liberalism

message: A redirect should go to a parallel topic, that is, American liberalism is parallel to liberalism in the United States, modern American liberalism is parallel to modern liberalism in the United States.  Rick Norwood (talk) 14:33, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I think the redirect should go to the article that contains the information the visitors is most likely attempting to seek. When a peson searches Wikipedia for "American liberalism," he or she is most likely looking for the ideology currently called "liberalism" in the U.S. (the info found in Modern liberalism in the United States), not a history of liberalism in the United States (the info found in Liberalism in the United States). Signaturebrendel 23:43, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

text: As confident as I am in my assumption, I suppose leading them to the "general" article, is not going to mislead them, so let's leave this redirect as it is. Signaturebrendel 21:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Maskineri

message: Butikken opp å stå and Smil far is the same song, "Smil far" is just what it's popularly called.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.167.96.196 (talk) 04:27, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  scrapped tracks, same songs 
Talk:Brendan I. Koerner

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section:
* Cite templates will be used where possible.
* I prefer capitalization and punctuation to follow the standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, rather than "title case".
* Links (either direct or indirect) to potentially unreliable or incomplete digitised copies and to booksellers may be removed. 
This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 05:14, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Daniel Ho

message: Hi Viriditas,
Thank you very much for your assessment of the article Daniel Ho.  I noticed you added a  tag to the article indicating that you have doubts as to whether or not the topic fulfills WP:MUSIC.  Item 8 of that guideline, however, notes that groups or individuals who have "won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury or Grammis award" are considered notable--Daniel Ho has won two Grammys in the new Hawaiian music category, which means he satisfies the criteria.
I've gone ahead, then, and removed the notability tag to reduce confusion.  I don't intend on expanding the article much further myself until it's had a chance to draw some other editors, so feel free to note any other issues you may see with it.  Mahalo! --jonny-mt 04:22, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability tag on [[Daniel Ho]] 

message: Daniel seems to have been born in the 1960's.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.139.78.20 (talk) 13:15, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date 
Talk:Diana West

message: I would not be surprised if Diana West wrote this article  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.110.53.34 (talk) 23:27, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

message: The Washington Examiner has a very short bio of Ms West here.
Townhall.com has a much longer bio here. Out of laziness, I added that as an EL; someone should use it for references for the article body ... any volunteers? CWC 11:51, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:William Gentle

message: Colonies Chris you have tagged this article with "No such date! and wouldn't it have been the Manchester Guardian back then?". I've corrected the date. It was a typo. The Guardian archives give the publication title as Guardian. I've just followed that.
** OK, thanks for sorting it out. Colonies Chris (talk) 16:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dispute on Source
Talk:Byzantine–Mongol Alliance

message: The Revision as of 1 January 2008 (Creation) contain the EB1911 attribution template , but I can not find an article in EB1911 that contains any of this text. So I am going to remove the template. Please do not put it back unless you can supply the parameters for EB1911 article name |wstitle=name |volume=num |page=num -- PBS (talk) 16:43, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  EB1911
Talk:Włodzimierz Brus

message: Lviv (known as Lvov in Polish) - Lviv is not known as Lvov in Polish. It is known as 'Lwów'.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.146.238.235 (talk) 15:31, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *Fixed, thanks.--Carabinieri (talk) 19:57, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

text: You're right, but Brus did not want to leave his wife to move back to Poland. She couldn't could, so he didn't want to either.--Carabinieri (talk) 19:57, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

text: What you're saying is ridiculous. Anti-Semitism and the Holocaust didn't only exist in the Jews' minds. He was admitted to the university, although many of his fellow Jews were not (because they were Jewish). This is referenced just as the rest of the article is. (Ever bother reading the articles linked in the footnotes?) Mentioning anti-Semitism is not POV, but an accurate depiction of history. He was forced to flee from Western Poland. If he hadn't, the Germans would have killed him.--Carabinieri (talk) 21:27, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Sorry for taking so long to answer. Where was I arguing ad hominem? I was calling what you wrote ridiculous, not you. My mentioning of the Holocaust was referring to your claim that Brus was not forced to flee. I am willing to settle on having the "forced to" removed, mostly because it makes very little difference in its meaning. I insist, however, on mentioning the part about Polish universities discriminating Jews. This is relevant to the article, because it was a challenge Brus had to overcome to attain his education. This claim is not only based on The Guardian (why would this newspaper make up this claim?), but also on the Featured Article about the History of the Jews in Poland. I have to admit I am also curious why exactly he decided to settle in Britain, but unfortunately the obituary doesn't say anymore than what I wrote in the article.--Carabinieri (talk) 01:11, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Brus' obituary in the Royal Economic Society's newsletter mentions that "He was offered a Fellowship at Wolfson College and then, in 1978, became a Professorial Fellow."  If he was also appointed to any academic departments, that could be useful to record.  (In what departments, for example, were his DPhil students housed?) Colin Rowat (talk) 10:16, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brus' position in Oxford
Talk:We Are Robin Hood!

message: clear it up a bit more! it's a bit confusing... there is no happy ending?
*I've added what I can. The ending is hard to describe: I thought Guy of Gisborne was going to kill the Sheriff and Robin and Marian would get married at the end. I never expected Guy to instead kill Marian and escape with the Sheriff, not to mention King Richard getting shot in the back with an arrow by the Sheriff, (he survives though). However, after Guy stabs Marian, he does back away looking guilty and afraid as he realizes what he's done. I'm glad King Richard survived. James Emtage (talk) 19:59, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ending
Talk:Schiebel Camcopter S-100

message: I do agree that the category name could be somewhat misleading, as it refers of course not to a work originated by, but rather in the holdings of the museum; and to which the museum has bestowed recognition comparable to that of a major design award.  What about shifting this to :Category:Industrial design collection of the Museum of Modern Art instead?--Pharos (talk) 16:13, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Exhibit categories are not really appropriate for aircraft articles, some aircraft types appear in many museums so would be overwhelmeed by such categorisation. Most aircraft articles do have a listing of aircraft on display in museums and I dont have a problem with a mention in the text with a reliable reference, but sorry not a suitable cat. MilborneOne (talk) 17:16, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, such a list would be appropriate. Good idea. I really question the existence of that category. — Huntster (t @ c) 22:13, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category name 

message: Many of them were just trials and not purchases  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.137.89.64 (talk) 22:34, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operators 

message: What's the cost of the Schiebel Camcopter S-100?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.65.57 (talk) 09:36, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  How much does this thing cost? 

message: Does a range of 180km mean 180km out and 180km back or does it mean 90km out and 90km back?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.65.117 (talk) 21:16, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The brochure gives an endurance of around six hours with a typical payload and an economical cruising speed of 55 knots, so running the maths I'm fairly sure that the range data is actually the radius of action, e.g. 90km there and 90km back. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 10:20, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query about the range 

message: I saw that it has been marked for cite needed and since i personally can see that it's an VM-V and not an S-100 i guess i have to show with pictures that it wasn't an Horizon Air S-100 but rather VM-V helicopter target and make it possible to remove the CN request.
The page i will use for images of VM-V is the official homepage  I will also use images posted by the Ukraine government of the wreck  For the picture of S-100 i will use the one from this wikipedia article, it should be clear where the images comes from that i will edit to show that it's actually an VM-V and not an S-100.  shows that it's an VM-V and not an S-100.919181512a (talk) 08:34, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: 20 April 2022 shot down
Talk:Twang!!

message: This is a very short article providing no content to the reader, and not enough (if any) google/yahoo hits. Λua∫Wise (talk) 15:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean by "not enough (if any) google/yahoo hits." Twang! is famous in theatrical history. If you type "bart" and "twang" (avoiding unrelated uses of the word) there are thousands of hits. --Paul B (talk) 11:09, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

text: The article has been expanded, but still has a long way to go. It must also provide verifiable sources.Λua∫Wise (talk) 15:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

text: If only the anonymous editor from January 2011 could have addressed the perceived "inappropriate tone for Wikipedia" on this page?  Without any constructive suggestions and failing to identify themselves- I am going to remove the posting they left on the page. --DamienSlattery 21:07, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Reviewing

message: The title of the show famously has two exclamation marks, and it is spelt thus in the article, so why does the article title just have one? (Twang!! redirects to this article, so it can't be a technical issue). AndrewWTaylor (talk) 16:39, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Googled this one, and you're right, of course!! Tried moving it but it wouldn't go!! - according to the error message because "Twang!!" is on a "black list" of titles (??) Much more serious - found a review of the show on another site that is word for word the same as our article - suspect that ours is NOT the original, and we are therefore breaching copyright (oh dear!).--Soundofmusicals (talk) 00:49, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

text: Of course it may very well be that ours IS the original, it happens that Wiki is sometimes plagarised. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 20:55, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw that various other sites, including discussion forums, copied from Wikipedia.  I believe DamienSlattery.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:22, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exclamation marks in title 

message: For an article about about a "minor" musical this is actually not that bad really. I have removed the tags - I suggest that anyone wanting to reinstate them bring up specific things on this page, or, much better still, do some further research/rewriting themselves. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 21:15, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  STILL far from being a "good" article BUT... 

message: This article should be moved to Twang!!.   As stated above, for unknown reasons, the exact name is on the title blacklist.  Can anyone kindly communicate with the powers that be and get them to open up the name? -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:11, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Name again; title blacklist
Talk:History of unmanned combat aerial vehicles

message: This should be included in the article. Parsecboy (talk) 16:32, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Naval Aircraft Factory TDN]][ 

message: This art is a mess as of now. It should be rearranged by history, not countries or products. Zezen (talk) 17:48, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: A mess