lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Outline of production

message: "Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation.  The Transhumanist 00:08, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines
Talk:The Three Johns

message: The band is on itunes, it is relativly famous (look at allmusic), it has John Peel sessions, it's not some insignificant teenage outfit, it played a significant role in the New Wave movement.
:New Wave? I see a lot of references to Indie and Post Punk but not New Wave Edkollin (talk) 19:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:T. H. Vinayakram

message: (Radhatanaya (talk) 09:12, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

message: can we remove the reference or sources tag? the first two links on the page (along with a google query for vinayakram) are ample evidence that vikku is one of the big legends of indian classical music.
it also accounts for the notability tag to be removed, but the article needs more work before that. in any case, please do not delete the article without discussion! --ti 23:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  detagging
Talk:Institute of Cultural Affairs International

message: This article isn't NPOV or very informative. The group has a history that involves some controversy. I grew up in the group, which during my childhood was an experimental intentional community, and the controversy has to do with to what degree ICAI (or ICA, as it used to be called), could fairly be described as a cult, either in the past or in the present. I have no objection to ICAI's writing an article about themselves that presents information about their organization, and don't wish to say anything negative about them, but if there's an encyclopedia article about ICAI it seems to me that it should provide factual information about the group's nature and history. I'd like to suggest that either they edit their article for NPOV and to make it more informative, as an actual encyclopedia entry, or that the article be deleted. Carolp999 23:13, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:GPS (band)

message: Is it beneficial to have all track names for Window To The Soul formatted as links? Four point to non-existent articles, others to irrelevant disambiguation pages and the rest to articles which have nothing to do with GPS (e.g. Written on the Wind). Unless there are objections I will consider tidying this as I think it unlikely pages will ever be required for each individual song.  Andy Berry 20:57, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If a song doesn't have its own article, then don't link it.  The album doesn't even have its own article. FotoPhest (talk) 12:58, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track names as links 

message: That brings me to my next point.  The album should have a separate article.  There will be another album, Dreamscape, later this year.  When I have the info for that, I'll make an article for that album. FotoPhest (talk) 12:58, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Window to the Soul
Talk:Hawker Woodcock

message: :Length in article 25' 7" v 26' 2"
:Span in artice 34' 8" v 32' 6"
:Height in article 9' v 9' 11"
:Wing Area in article 356 sq ft  346 sq ft
The figures for the Woodcock II in the article differ from those given in Putnams's "Aircraft of the Royal Air Force since 1918", anybody have the source used to check, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 20:05, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Dimensions were for the Mk I - I must have made a transcription error when I first entered them in 2007 - now fixed.Nigel Ish (talk) 20:41, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that, I dont have the Hawker book. MilborneOne (talk) 20:45, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Specifications
Talk:Fear of death

message: For such an important topic, it is very badly written, isn't it? --Onias 17:23, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I think the article desparately requires information pertaining to the subjective experience of this fear, not just the scientific information. Then again, I don't know how one might put in this information and keep the article NPOV. GenericGabriel 02:01, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

message: This article is not very informative, and just showed up this year. I've also got a hunch that much of this is original research. I think we should take what little good stuff is in here and move it to Necrophobia. --Explodicle 21:56, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The difference is that a phobia is necessarily irrational; it's part of the definition. Fear of death is perfectly logical and therefore they are different phenomena.144.89.184.190 04:22, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Then maybe we should merge it with Self preservation? --Explodicle 12:08, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Ok, discussion has pretty much stopped, and the article hasn't really gotten any better. If no one has any objections I will start merging with Self preservation --Explodicle 21:23, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

text: *I was just going through the article for what to merge and what to lose, and I can't find anything that doesn't seem to be original research. If there is anything that anyone thinks ought to be kept, please add it to Self preservation. Otherwise I'm just going to delete it all and redirect. --Explodicle 20:31, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to necrophobia?
Category talk:Snooker people

message: This category needs another name ('Snooker figures off the table'?), as many of its members are former or current players who happen to have other roles [The previous unsigned comment was posted by , 20:54, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just put them in both this and the relevant player category. Look at the HTML commenting on the categorization of some of the people already in the category. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]   ‹(-¿-)› 21:33, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename?
Talk:Rob Cavallo

message: Rob Cavallo produced Avril Lavigne 's third album The Best Damn Thing.....thats is not in the text!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.189.114.245 (talk) 23:22, 16 January 2007
:"I'm doing my ballads with Rob Cavallo, I give my pop-rock songs to Butch, I give my rock songs to Deryck, and Luke has been experimenting with different sounds and stuff," she said.
:He's not doing the whole album, just the ballads.  If you want to include it, you may, but I'm not going to edit it.--Jude 07:35, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Grandpa Gohan

message: Article discussing Grandpa Gohan being the toughest fight for Goku ~ https://screenrant.com/goku-greatest-battle-heartbreaking-grandpa-gohan-dragon-ball/
Article discussing about why Goku may or may not wanting to revive Grandpa Gohan ~ https://www.cbr.com/dragon-ball-why-grandpa-gohan-never-revived/
Article discussing about Son Goku and Grandpa Son Gohan being reunited ~ https://comicbook.com/anime/news/dragon-ball-goku-gohan-touching-fan-art-anime-manga/
Article discussing Son Goku's first kill which was Grandpa Son Gohan ~ https://screenrant.com/gokus-first-dragon-ball-kill-grandpa-gohan-is-tragic-origin/
Article discussing Grandpa Son Gohan's death ~ https://www.cbr.com/original-dragon-ball-went-too-far/
Article discussing most powerful humans ~ https://www.sportskeeda.com/anime/10-powerful-humans-dragon-ball-ranked
Article talking about Goku and Grandpa Gohan even more ~ https://bleedingcool.com/games/dragon-ball-super-previews-history-of-goku-grandfather-son/
I believe "Grandpa Gohan" should be made again, with correct articles like the ones I've listed. Grandpa Son Gohan has also recently gotten really popular than usual because of the EZA event. (https://twitter.com/AirDokkan/status/1552670579123265536) BigLemonJuice (talk) 08:23, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Admin note: above comment copied over to Talk:List of Dragon Ball characters. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:41, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate Page For Grandpa Gohan
Talk:Private Trains (domino game)

message: Does anyone know what the difference between Mexican train and Private train they sound the same to me.--Psjoding 23:27, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Instead, players can place a tile on Mexican train if they have a matching tile."
Erm... Wrong game... I don't know the rules of this game, or I would re-write this sentence.
69.65.232.61 (talk) 10:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mexican Train written in article?
Talk:History of Seoul

message: Colonial Korea's Fu(府)s is written as the same as Fu(府)s in today's Japan. However, fus in colonial Korea actually were not at the same level of fus today's Japan. The former is a municipal level for being under control of a province and the letter is a prefectural level for being an independent metropolitan entity. Thus, Colonial Korea's Fu(府) should be translated to "(municipal) city" other than "prefecture".
Finefir2001 (talk) 15:43, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colonial Korea's Fu(府) and Comtemporary Japan's Fu(府) 

message: What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content. Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 17:07, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Timeline of Seoul]]
Talk:Rollatini

message: Is this a southern Italian-style dish?  Most online sources seem to point that way.  Badagnani 23:35, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This dish does not exist in Italy, period.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.170.154.95 (talk) 22:27, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Southern?
Category talk:Pool people

message: Pat Fleming of Accu-Stats Video Productions should be in this category, even though he used to compete professionally.  His Accu-Stats formula is used as a measuring stick for how well a player performs in matches. RailbirdJAM 22:48, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He is in :Category:Cue sports inventors and innovators for that.  There are not enough articles yet to break that out into :Category:Pool inventors and innovators as a subcategory here yet. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 09:47, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pat Fleming
Talk:Willy Puchner

message: I've deleted a substantial portion of the article. This portion obviously came from this page (plus necessary grammatical conversions for normal prose). I can't see any explanation on the site that text there is released under GFDL and therefore deleted it as a copyright violation. -- Hoary 09:40, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 06:21, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Havoth-Jair

message: In all likelyhood, the cities of Havot-Jair refer to settlements which were attributed to a founder named Jair--the same as the Gileadite Jair. The fact that there would be 2 Jairs, both from Mannasseh, both descendants of Makir, in the same general location seems unlikely.
Joshua 17:1 says that Makir, son of Mannasseh, was the first to settle Gilead and Bashan. Makir's son was Gilead, and his grandson Segub, and his great grandson was the Jair who governed 60 cities during the period of judges--whenever that may have been (1200-1100bc?)
Let's assume that Jair was ruler of Havot-Jair in 1150 bc. If his great grand father Makir conquered Bashan from the Amorite king Og, this would have been 3 generations ago, or approx. 85 years earlier.
This would then suggest that Bashan was inherited in c. 1225-1250 BC if Makir was the first settler to obtain the land from the Amorites.
--71.215.154.31 23:39, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: In 2 Samuel, King David's Officials are mentioned, and Ira is his priest. How should this be placed into the article? Twillisjr (talk) 23:11, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ira (King David's Priest)
Talk:333 South Wabash

message: I am the author of the http://steveandamysly.tannerworld.com/features/cnaplaza/ page that I noticed someone linked to in this Wikipedia article.  (Thanks, by the way).  I'd be open to contributing some of my photography of the CNA window lighting designs for inclusion in this article.  How would I go about doing that? :) Tannerman 04:12, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I've gone ahead and added some more context and photos regarding the lighted window messages.  Hopefully, they fall within Wikipedia guidelines.  If not, please hack away! Tannerman 04:12, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Author

message: Add these to the article when there is room for them.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.0.139.105  (talk • contribs) 20:25, 11 May 2010
:I have created a gallery for them.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  14:32, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures
Talk:Mexican oil expropriation

message: In section International opossition: 
I recall Mexico did not traded petroleum with fascist powers, there is a letter that Cardenas sent to Roosevelt mentioning to him that if he allows his goverment to boicot Mexico, then he will be forced to trade with the fascist countries. As soon as I get the reference I will post it.
macross 23:41, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are some details here Lázaro Cárdenas#Oil expropriation that aren't found in this article.  That should probably be rectified. I'm noting it here because I don't have to time to do it right now. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  22:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorporating material from [[Lázaro Cárdenas#Oil expropriation]]
Talk:Push It to the Limit (Corbin Bleu song)

message: This article is looking really good. One problem, though: lyrics should not be included unless they are small excerpts, for copyright reasons. It's certainly good to discuss them, though. Everyking 08:49, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Why was he allowed to make that song? Their is already a song called that. DAMN! Why does this have the spotlight now? DAMN! --172.143.232.224 20:36, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GODDAMMIT! 

message: "THERE IS ONE FEMALE BACKGROUND SINGER!"
ignoring the irrelevance, it's in all caps, which sometimes means vandalism, what do you guys think? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MichaelACookII (talk • contribs) 14:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Femal background singer? 
Talk:Douglas XB-43 Jetmaster

message: I am concerned that this article contains text (i.e. the entire history section) from another site.  Not being too familiar with protocols, is this acceptable to take without citation?  How would we cite the whole section?  Earthworm Makarov 03:41, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree, needs inline citations to be a B-class. --Colputt 18:22, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smithsonian merge 
Talk:Jacula

message: Can we get some references for this page?
I'm looking around the net for some suitable refs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by GDA9 (talk • contribs) 19:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Look at the Discogs entry on Antonious Rex: http://www.discogs.com/artist/332069-Antonius-Rex
And here for Jacula: http://www.discogs.com/artist/1039835-Jacula
It's the same band, just with a different name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.42.44.222 (talk) 20:52, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jacula and Antonious Rex 

message: Excuse me... AllMusicGuide is mentioned as the source stating that Jacula disbanded in 2017, but I didn't find any mention of this in that page.--NuM3tal95 (talk) 10:41, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disbanded?
Talk:Southbank Centre

message: I propose that this page and all associated links should revert to South Bank Centre. 
THE SOUTH BANK CENTRE remains the title registed with the Charity Commission for England and Wales for charity 298909 and the trustee body remains incorporated as THE SOUTH BANK BOARD Company No. 02238415.
I have serious doubts whether this latest rebranding will last any longer than the disastrous attempt to rebrand the Queen Elizabeth Hall as RFH2 and the Purcell Room as RFH3 in the mid 1990s.
I do not consider it acceptable for an encyclopedia article to be renamed to align with a corporate makeover, if there has been no change to legal form or the generally accepted title.
--Lang rabbie 23:59, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the article should match the commonly accepted styling, rather than the legal form. Personal preference shouldn't come in to it.  Writing this 9 years later, the rebranding seems to have stuck. If necessary have a redirect from the latter to the former. Matt Whyndham (talk) 09:40, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

text: However, I do think the article should explain where and when the current styling comes from (a rebrand in 2006-7? don't know the details personally) rather than silently dropping the South Bank Centre form (which I remember using in my youth, sigh) and moving to the new Southbank Centre form.  Something like. "In 2007 a rebranding of the Centre was commissioned from <agency> with the result that the name of the organisation was now to be styled as the Southbank Centre. This form appeared on all the Centre's published materials from that date." Matt Whyndham (talk) 09:40, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Talk:Friuli

message: What about these topics ?
* economy:
* politics;
* demographics;
* images;
* etc.
Adetrax 08:33, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone is slowly replacing the article with translated text, but unfortunately, it's either a computer-translation or the user is translating the text literally. Thus, the current article makes little sense. In my opinion, a well-written short article is much better than a long incomprehensible one. I believe the most recent version of the article (before the translated text was added) is here. BuddingJournalist 21:33, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing topics

message: This article is already on Wikipedia (see Friuli – Venezia Giulia). I believe a redirect is in order. Comments? The Utahraptor Talk 01:07, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Be BOLD. Redirect. NielsenGW (talk) 05:05, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: I made some change to the part talking of Venetian Era. I have not made pro-Venetian changes, instead I tried to give a more balanced and historical-like view of that centuries of the history of Friuli, also making some small correction.
Filippo83 (talk) 17:13, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venetian Era 
Talk:World Pool Masters

message: I should have said this a long time ago. I'm not sure if this can be sourced in any proper way but this was mentioned by an announcer in a recorded match. FoxLad (talk) 23:35, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  European Pool Masters 

message: See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cue sports/Archive 1#Event pics available for details. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 09:23, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Event pics available
Talk:Sepia novaehollandiae

message: I just noticed that Sepia hedleyi currently redirects to this page. The redirection is an error, as the species Sepia hedleyi is valid in its own right. See ITIS for details: http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=556046 I don't know how to correct this problem, so I'm entrusting it to another more experienced editor. --Danimations (talk) 12:45, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect redirect
Talk:Arnd Klawitter

message: Since somebody has started the process to delete this article: 
Arnd Klawitter presently is one of the most frequently cast german actors between 30 and 40 in tv movies and is everything but "not notable". On Google I got more than 23.000 hits for his name. --Vully 00:18, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:New Jersey Route 77

message: This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 06:04, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: . Dough4872 (talk) 23:24, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: USRD GA audit
Talk:Glenn Coffee

message: As Oklahoma State Senator Glenn Coffee goes to work this legislative session, there may be opportunities to expand this article. ProfessorPaul 00:32, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Another article for "the Project"
Category talk:Wikipedians in Nebraska

message: Do former residents not from or living in count? User:Christy747 example? just curious. --Xiahou 00:34, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See :Category:Nebraska Wikipedians.   Buaidh  talk contribs 22:52, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Operation Show Me How

message: When did this operation take place? I see no information on this occurring. This is such a small article and how did it earn a DYK? Chris 02:47, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline of operation 

message: This article has insufficient references and if it were not a current DYK, I would nominate it for deletion. The external link provided gives very little information on this operation - not even the year when it happened. I ran a Factiva search for "Show Me  How" and "Interpol" and received zero relevant hits. I found this magazine interview which gives the operation a mention and dates it as starting at around 1998 but gives no end year for the operation. BUt the interview does not support the article's claims that this was an encyclopedically notable operation . The claims that this was an unprecendented drug bust involving unusual use of the postal system are so far unverifiable, as is the claim about the children's colouring book. Even if proven, I'm not sure how these amount to encyclopedic notability. I'm having difficulty understanding why this is a DYK too. Bwithh 05:43, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referencing problem
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Scott Johnson (artist)

message: Many who are discussing on this page are new users that seem to be created solely to argue in this afd, see here.
:"Velt Cardio Says:
January 16th, 2007 at 4:09 pm
Ok, so i made myself a username, i plead for the scott johnson entry to stay"
- Ocatecir 00:39, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Drift ice

message: Does anyone else see this article's animation as a distraction? Uninformative? A static map would be more effective in my view. The animation reminds me of early web days when people used to throw up blinking text all over the place-- good at snagging the eye -- that's about it. Fishdecoy 00:39, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem with this image is that it pulsates too fast. A static map would occupy much space. A good idea could be a controlled pulsation. Is it possible? `'mikka 11:07, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Animation 