lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jerry Krause

message: I've read multplie versions of how Krause stepped down as GM of the Bulls. Sam Smith of the Chicago Tribune claims that Krause was forced out of office while other reports suggest that he retired due to health problems. Anyone know for sure as to why he stepped down? --TheAznSensation 2 July 2005 01:53 (UTC)
I contacted Sam Smith of the Chicago Tribune who is the beat reporter for the Chicago Bulls regarding the exact nature of Krause's retirement. He maintains that Krause was forced out of office:
"all sides agreed it to be officially a resignation. but krause was told it was time to go. many resignations are like that" --TheAznSensation 01:20, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, I forgot to add the citation when I wrote it a year and a half ago. Now it's up. -- Davis21Wylie 16:14, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Retirement

message: This article seemed very critical of Krause when talking about "how he tried to fit in"
are there lots of sources for this?
When talking about Krause, shouldn't viewpoints come from more than Halberstam's POV. This article seems very biased to me.
I totally agree...it's very biased. Someone should tag it with neutrality disputed. Bremen 20:43, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias in comments on Krause 

message: This article is amazingly biased against Krause. Krause was an idiot, but it's blatantly obvious to me that a VERY pro-Jordan person wrote most of the article. I trimmed tons of peacock terms, non NPOV allegations, added a lot of citation needed tags, and called for a major clean-up. This article at one point looked like something you'd find in a gossip rag. Major referencing is needed. 24.186.96.84 (talk) 23:52, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the "citation needed" tags are gone. I got a LOT of information out of David Halberstam's Jordan bio. Still needs quite a bit of cleanup, but it's nowhere near as bad now, IMHO. — Dale Arnett (talk) 01:48, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: This section (at least the bullet points) seems too gossipy to belong in an encyclopedia. Funnyhat (talk) 02:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Last Dance" 

message: Perhaps its my inexperience, but this article has footnote references that, when clicked and expanded, show up as empty.  I thought at first it was an aberration upon number 15 regarding Krause’s “Crumbs” nickname but it twice recurred At numbers 22 & 23. 
Upon further inspection, I found that each of these footnotes themselves pointed to an earlier numbered footnote.  I now conclude that Wikipedia is unable to resolve such multiple or “nested” references. Therefore, I suggest the author correct this to improve the referencing capability.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Btbost (talk • contribs) 20:54, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Perry Farrell

message: I  was 15/16 yrs old ....circa 1981 and Perry was laid out on the sidewalk outside a club in Hollywood and almost tripped over him getting in the door .... we were there to see Twisted Roots a reggae-influenced punk band headed up by Maggie....  my 17 yr old friend motioned to Perry and said that P.O.S. was Maggie's boyfriend  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oostende9 (talk • contribs) 00:42, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perry Farrell Origins
Talk:Alexandra Nechita

message: I've nominated this article for deletion. I do not have an account and don't wish to create one, however, so it would be nice if someone who is logged in could complete steps II and III as outlined here:
WP:AFD#How_to_list_pages_for_deletion
My reason for doing this is that I think it's pretty clear that she doesn't meet the standards for notability. Sources are not cited throughout the article, despite the many assertions made. One of the references at the bottom of the page is her personal site; not acceptable according to that policy page. Another of the sources is her IMDB page, which, in addition to being pretty scant, is also specifically not admitted as a biographical source by Wikipedia policy. The third seems to be a local newspaper article about her, copied to another (rather unprofessional-looking) site. This is a secondary source, but please note the additional criteria on the notability policy page - the coverage is not substantial, the source is not notable (nor necessarily independent), and it stands alone at the moment. Judging from the edit history this page seems to have been put up and maintained by her and/or some of her friends, who I assume will contest this deletion (which is why I did not use proposed deletion). If anyone can find some more sources, in compliance with notability policy linked above, to support her notability, then the page should be kept. But I doubt this will be possible, in which case I support its deletion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.249.92.63 (talk) 06:31, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded. How remarkable is she? Perhaps this should be deleted for vanity?
I vote against deletion.  She was on CNN's front page just the other day.  She has received a lot of awards and media attention over her career. - jsdratm
http://www.nechita.info/awards.htm
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/living/2007/11/30/ypwr.alexandra.nechita.cnn?iref=videosearch
http://www.lewisbond.com/nechita/about_nechita.html
http://www.museumsyndicate.com/artist.php?artist=513  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsdratm (talk • contribs) 19:12, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Talk:Peter Murphy

message: 84.4.56.218's latest edit seems a bit suspect to me. It isn't very descriptive in a clear and NPOV manner (except for the single strobe light thing, which isn't even completely true), and the language is so poetic that it seems to be quoted from somewhere. And all things considered, writing about Bauhaus should be kept to the Bauhaus page. Folkor 23:35, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latest edit 

message: I'm not definate whether he's a Sufi or not, but I know his wife is. I know this for definate, I've met him many many times. But I can't find any sources >.< If anyone finds any links, tell me. I do, however, have sources stating his Sufi inspiration. 782 Naumova 17:25, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sufi
Talk:Southwestern Front (Soviet Union)

message: I thought Semyon Budyonny was a commander of SouthWest too.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:86B:4A00:9108:73EE:ABB0:14B8 (talk) 19:09, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Budyonny
Talk:List of geoscience organizations

message: Would the United States Geological Survey be appropriate for this page?  So far it seems to be strictly non-profits, academic associations, and international bodies. Isomorphic 2 July 2005 02:48 (UTC)
:With the national geoogical surveys listed since the above note (China, Canada,  and India), it looks OK to add USGS. -- Paleorthid 21:05, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  In which case we probably need one for 100+ other countries, starting with British Geological Survey. Pterre (talk) 17:35, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Oak Park Heights Prison

message: I am a student at Minneapolis Community tech. College and a couple people in our class our working on this Wikipedia article to make it one of Wikipedia's Featured articles by adding three criteria that is considered to be a "featured aritlce". The three things we are adding ( or changing) is the Comprehensiveness of the article and making it better researched, also by changing the lead.  I feel the lead of this artilce is very blah and doesn't do a good job catching the readers eye and telling the reader what is all going to be talked about throughtout the artilce itself. Also by making sure it has appropriate structure and adding section headings. For example this will be done through adding or changing the 
Introduction
History
design 
security 
conclusion
Let me know if you have any other ideas  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mieritz533 (talk • contribs) 12:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

message: Hello everyone-
Would like to move the page from Oak Park Heights Prison to Minnesota Correctional Facility - Oak Park Heights. This will place its nomenclature in line with the other prison facilities of the Minnesota Department of Corrections and will be more correct to its official name. Are there any objections? Zoz0716 (talk) 23:46, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving of page
Talk:William Henry Moody

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/William Henry Moody was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 16:15, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Cuenca, Spain

message: I added the template as the hanging houses section seems to offer opinion on the city which is not attributed to anyone and is not backed up by sources. Could someone find where the information in that section was retrieved from and add appropriate references? It Is Me Here (talk) 22:08, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Template:POV-check|POV-check]] template 

message: In this edit ,  changed conquered to liberated. What's the consensus here?—C45207 | Talk 10:05, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conquered or liberated 

message: With 17,061 km2, Cuenca is not “being almost as large as countries like Slovenia or Montenegro,″, but is actually roughly 25% bigger than Montenegro (13,812 km2). Their closest matches worldwide are Kuwait and Swaziland.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.2.69.128 (talk) 11:37, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size comparison 
Talk:Joseph McKenna

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Joseph McKenna was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 15:07, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:George Shiras Jr.

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/George Shiras Jr. was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 20:49, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage

message: "Shiras was the only Supreme Court justice, as of 2013, to have no record of public (political, governmental or judicial) service."
Shiras was a federal elector in 1888, before his nomination in 1892.  See The Supreme Court Compendium (5th edition 2012) p. 359.  The sentence above should be deleted immediately.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.190.178.190 (talk) 09:20, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: ERROR
Talk:Henry Billings Brown

message: The whole paragraph on Plessy in the Legacy section reads like an opinion piece. Who is being quoted in this sentence: "Brown will always be linked with Plessy, but in the context of his entire life perhaps he should not wholly be defined by one decision—deplorable as it is—out of the thousands of cases he capably handled during three decades on the federal bench." ? It should be removed, not only because it is against Wikipedia rules about original writing, but also because it is needlessly apologetic. People should be presented with the facts and they can draw their own conclusions Pearl2525 (talk) 01:59, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy 

message: I reversed a bit of very unencyclopedic conjecture and personal opinion regarding Jusice Brown in order to make the article more scholarly. 65.28.2.172 05:52, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ? 

message: I removed the prod on this article, which said that the subject was not notable. 
An Associate Justice is clearly notable. -- Bpmullins | Talk 07:29, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  prod 

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Henry Billings Brown was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 16:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Brewpub

message: "A brewpub is a combination restaurant and microbrewery..." In my town there is an establishment calling itself a brewpub that is not a restaurant.  Does this word refer exclusively to combination restaurant-bars in other parts of the world?  Friday 2 July 2005 03:39 (UTC)
::I agree. Many brewpubs may contain a restaurant, but this is not universal. The very name itself indicates what a brewpub is: a bar that makes some or all of it's own beer. The restaurant element is not related. Dxco 00:47, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. I also take issue with "The first American brewpub was Grant's Brewery Pub in Yakima, Washington, which opened in 1982. According to Merriam-Webster, the term was first used in 1984..." While the term might be new, the concept certainly isn't. 72.131.44.247 19:11, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Dee Palmer

message: Wikipedia has an utterly idiotic policy that transsexuals have amazing retroactive sex changes, so 'she' met with Terry Ellis in the 1960s 35 years before becoming a 'she'. Every time I have seen her perform on stage, 'she' was a he and just another member of Tull.
I think we should adopt common sense, otherwise you have a [someone] who [was] with a bunch of male band members on tour for decades without marrying any of them.
The discussion up above looks at different ways to obfuscate the simple reality. The reality is really easy, so let's adopt reality here.
My understanding is that encyclopedias are about facts, not lies.
Varlaam (talk) 16:13, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: With regard to pronouns, MOS:IDENTITY is standard practice and a Wikipedia guideline, and as a result should be followed here.  If you feel differently, it would be appropriate to gain WP:CONSENSUS to change that there, not here, first.  --joe deckertalk to me 17:03, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronoun confusion 

message: Both date and place of birth appear to be unsourced. I have made the first line consistent with the infobox by changing "London" to "Wolverhampton, West Midlands", but without any indication of which might be correct. There is nothing about early life at personal bio. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:33, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: IMDb has 2 July 1937 for date. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: last.fm has "Dee Palmer (born David Victor Palmer, 2 July 1937, in Hendon, North West, London) is an English arranger and keyboardist best known for having been a member of the rock group Jethro Tull." So I intend to update to that. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:52, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

text: Curiously FreeBMD returns no David V. Palmer born in that quarter. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:58, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: last.fm is NOT a source. If you look at the article date and compare it with the contemporary version of this article, you can easily see that the last.fm editor simply copied the Wikipedia article in its then state. I know this is a problem because last.fm is user-generated like Wikipedia. So, you can either find a better source or I'll put a  template on the article.Jules TH 16 (talk) 20:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps we can agree with Wikipedia policy that AllMusic is generally regarded as a 'reliable source' (WP:RSP).  As such, I have added the relevant notation to it to support both the date, and place of birth, that was already stated in the article. At the very least AllMusic is a source and should suffice until a more reliable one is unearthed.  As a complete aside, Wikipedia's policy over reliable sources is such that virtually all online details for music related matters are not deemed sufficiently robust.  Bonkers. - Derek R Bullamore (talk) 22:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date and place of birth
Talk:Samuel Nelson

message: This article lists his term as beginning on February 14, 1845.  That was when the Senate confirmed his nomination.  He did not take his oath, wasn't sworn in, until February 27, 1845.
This article lists how President Tyler failed on previous attempts to fill the vacant seat of Justice Thompson.  However, it wrongly includes the names of Edward King and John Read.  There are two things wrong with that: first, King & Read were never nominated for Thompson's seat, they were each nominated to fill the vacant seat of Justice Baldwin; and second, John Read was nominated to to Baldwin's seat on February 7, 1845 which is three days after Nelson had been nominated to Thompson's seat.  And John Read was never "rejected" by the Senate; the Senate took "No Action" on the nomination (likely on account of Tyler leaving office less than a month later, on March 4, 1845).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by McGrupp10799 (talk • contribs) 23:36, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors 

message: On List of Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, it says retirement. On this page, it says otherwise. What's true? -- Toytoy July 2, 2005 03:46 (UTC)
* Retirement, according to the FJC. bd2412 T 16:12, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retirement or resignation?
Talk:Oliver Ellsworth

message: On List of Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, it says resignation. On this page, it says something like retirement to me. What's true? -- Toytoy July 2, 2005 03:50 (UTC)
How do you expect him to retire if he didn't first resign? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThePug (talk • contribs) 23:55, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retirement or resignation? 

message: Oliver Ellsworth made sure our government continued to be called the "United States" government by his motion, he did not create the term and he was not the first to use the term.Tomticker5 (talk) 21:30, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The naming of the "United States" 

message: I added this due to the pains he suffered which ended his career: Even if Ellsworth was viewed as "a valuable acquisition ot the Court," and "a great loss to the Senate," he resigned after just 4 years due to his "constant, and at times excruciating pains," sufferings made worst by his Europe travels, as special envoy to France.Laboratory of Justice, The Supreme Court's 200 Year Struggle to Integrate Science and the Law, by David L. Faigman, First edition, 2004, p. 34; Smith, Republic of Letters, 15, 501
--Florentino floro (talk) 06:25, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Resignation due to pains

message: "The Judiciary Act and Bill of Rights thus counterbalanced each other, each guaranteeing respite from the excesses of the other. However, with the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1865, seventy-five years later, the Bill of Rights could be brought to bear at all levels of government as interpreted by the judiciary with final appeal to the Supreme Court. Needless to say, this had not been the original intention of either Madison or Ellsworth."
The inclusion of the phrase "needless to say" is a red flag that this is an unsubstantiated bit of personal opinion. Needed is citation of a later reputable published source that relates Ellsworth's documented views on separation and balance of powers to the14th Amendment.
Jperrylsu (talk) 20:54, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Achievements as legislator
Talk:Fuzzy measure theory

message: what is Fuzzy measure theory? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Srinivasasha (talk • contribs) 04:51, 2 July 2005 (UTC)

message: TeX in section headings fails to appear in the table of contents.  It should therefore be avoided.  I found an instance of it here, and changed it to non-TeX notation. Michael Hardy (talk) 16:10, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  TeX in headings 

message: it was said in the Sugeno measure  that A and B pertain to 2^X which is wrong , it is A and B pertain to P(X) the set of subsets of X.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boutarfa Nafia (talk • contribs) 13:12, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: In the Moebus section the formula for g(E) don't hold if the subsets of E are not disjoint by intersection , the formula can also  be wrong if E=X  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boutarfa Nafia (talk • contribs) 13:17, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion
Talk:Universal call to holiness

message: ...Is it really necessary to wikify "human beings"? --User:Jenmoa 2 July 2005 03:58 (UTC)
Living a holy life, as defined by the Catholic church, has little to do with perfection? Really? It has nothing to do with perfectionism, and (especially if the "universality" is stressed) with the state of perfection, but I thing St. Thomas uses the word "perfection" for quasi-exactly this in his Summa theol., 2nd/2nd 184. And if it is a fine answer to the universal call for holiness what, say, Opus Dei supernumeraries do, the much-talked-about man in the street would quite agree with him that this word is fitting. --84.154.61.218 (talk) 20:43, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

message: This article strongly affirms that the Catholic Church has always taught the Universal call to holiness. I'm not convinced this is true. While we can creatively reconcile diverse teachings, I am fairly confident that this teaching has been emphasized in recent times in particular to counteract (perhaps misinterpreted) earlier teachings that the evangelical counsels were only for some (esp. monks), and common people could largely ignore Jesus' commands in the gospels. This article would do well to discuss this. Daask (talk) 21:35, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality and relationship with Evangelical counsels
Talk:Abraham Darby

message: I think this one can quite profitably stay in one piece for now, being about one family, and having very short blurbs on the son and grandson.  If either of the 2 latter bios grow, I'd support breaking them out to separate articles and disambiguating. Pedant 2005 July 2 04:34 (UTC)
:I agree.   Note that also the French and German article are (at the moment) still in one piece. -- Austrian 21:17, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree as well.  In time I think that the article can (and will) be expanded to an extent that justifies splitting, but it is not appropriate at the moment.  Noisy | Talk 18:03, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
Well, it was split by User:Sepand who obviously didn't bother to read the talk page.  I've tidied up after him.  Noisy | Talk 14:54, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Splitting?
Talk:Confession of judgment

message: Is this a real power?
Yes.  Whoever wrote this article doesn't know very much, seeming to imply that it is outlawed everywhere in the US.  There are quite a few states that specifically allow for Confession of Judgments.  New Jersey and Pennsylvania are 2 of them.--Davidwiz 20:28, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I think the material on this page about the Solicitor General is doubtful, and I was unable to verify it.  Please see the discussion at Talk:Solicitor General of the United States#Confession_of_judgment. —Mark Dominus (talk) 17:51, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solicitor General of the United States 

message: This article deals only with state laws in the USA. It exists or at least existed in Victorian times also in English law, so it is quite possibly also dealt with in other English-derived legal systems either as something legal or illegal. Thryduulf (talk) 00:12, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize