lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Getúlio Fredo

message: I've taken off the proposed deletion tag, which said May fail WP:BIO WP:SPORT. Firstly WP:SPORT is not an accepted guideline, and secondly if you are not sure about whether the article fails a guideline you shouldn't use WP:PROD. If you think the article should be deleted then it should be discussed at WP:AFD. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:10, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:World Press Photo of the Year

message: 1972: "The young Phan Thị Kim Phúc and other children flee with severe burns caused by napalm, dropped accidentally by South Vietnamese planes."
accidentally ?!?!?
tonii (it.wiki)--147.162.46.106 (talk) 15:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 1972 pic

message: It seems to me there is something wrong with the linked images. 
The article links the same picture for 2011 and 2012 . The article says that the 2012 winner was Paul Hansen for his Gaza funeral image, but the linked image is by Samuel Aranda, which is also the linked image for 2011. Dlv999 (talk) 13:29, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: [Insert]: Forgot to mention I fixed that. CarolMooreDC - talkie talkie🗽 20:30, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: I added the new World Press Photo of the Year 2015. Could a native speaker please check if everything is correct?--Ururfaust (talk) 22:04, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  2015 

message: It appears that many of the image links are now broken (as of at least 2016-02-12).  They return 403 (Forbidden errors).  In fact the archive webserver that the older images were hosted on, www.archive.worldpressphoto.org, appears to be throwing 403 errors at the top level. A cursory inspection of worldpressphoto.org seems to indicate that this domain is no longer in use and that they've undergone a reorganization of their content.  It appears that all the referenced image links have changed.  For example, the 1985 photo by Pablo Bartholomew is currently using this link:
http://www.archive.worldpressphoto.org/search/layout/result/indeling/detailwpp/form/wpp/q/ishoofdafbeelding/true/trefwoord/year/1985
But the image currently resides here:
http://www.worldpressphoto.org/collection/photo/1985/world-press-photo-year/pablo-bartholomew
All the image links that reference www.archive.worldpressphoto.org likely need to be updated by searching www.worldpressphoto.org for their current location.
BrucePennypacker (talk) 14:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken image links 

message: The photos from 1971 - 2017 are all one year off. For example the pic labelled as the 1971 winner is actually the 1972 winner. This can be checked by clicking on the image link for any picture from 1971 - 2017 and you can see the website that it links to will list the photo as the following year. Simple error but I have no idea how to fix it, just thought I'd give a heads up.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.245.158.131 (talk) 12:32, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: This always confuses me. I'm sure there's something somewhere that explains that the award given in a particular year is for photos taken in the previous year, but I can never find it so can't be sure. --Lopifalko (talk) 13:25, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Years
Talk:Armin van Buuren production discography

message: I'm well aware that section titles follow similar capitalization rules to a book, however I noticed that when one clicks on the little arrow in the discography template to go to the corresponding section, nothing happens. This appears to because it was originally linking to a section called "Studio albums" (based on what went into the URL bar), and the section was titled "Studio Albums." As a result, I lowercased a bunch of titles such that it works. I'm not sure if a template rework is in order or what, just summarizing my observations and what I did. Jscottcc (talk) 15:03, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  De-capitalization of Titles 

message: All of Armin's singles under the aliases "Rising Star" and "Gaia" among others are not under the singles list  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.12.158.168 (talk) 05:40, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gaia/Rising Star Singles 

message: Armin has tons of releases, most under his own name and some under Gaia (tbh a majority of his alias-ed releases are under Gaia). Can we separate the singles with the ones under his own name, under Gaia, and the rest with his other aliases? Perhaps something like "as lead artist", "as Gaia", and "as other aliases" would work out. aNode (discuss) 13:10, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separation of singles based on aliases
Talk:Canadian chartered bank notes

message: There are a few banks on the list that did emit banknotes but were never chartered. The Banque du Peuple and Hart's Bank, for example, were never able to secure a Charter. Be very careful when using this page. It would need to have more explicit sources, or be renamed to something like "Canadian banks of  emission".--Melt core (talk) 08:12, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: N.B. The Bank of Canada (commercial) in the table and the one linked are not the same as the one in the linked article was not chartered until well after the time frame given for the notes cited.  2600:1004:B166:FDEA:40E6:F42D:781D:9475 (talk) 03:10, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Validity
Talk:Panagrellus redivivus

message: I am pretty sure that 'vinegar eels' are Turbatrix Aceti, a totally different species from 'microworms,' Panagrellus redivivus.  I'm unclear on why this article conflates the two; they're both used as fish food and both free-living nematodes but that's about where the similarity ends.  I will have a go at splitting this out into two articles unless someone wants to correct me :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewbogott (talk • contribs) 23:06, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now read the article (http://nemaplex.ucdavis.edu/FerrisPublications/pdf%20files/165Ferris2009.pdf) that is cited for the synonyms but I do not interpret it as saying that T. aceti is a synonym.  Perhaps the list of synonyms here is just a list of every nematode mentioned in that article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewbogott (talk • contribs) 23:19, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This is edging precariously close to original research, but I reached out to Howard Ferris about his taxonomy paper and he confirmed: "I do not the assert the synonymy of Turbatrix aceti and Panagrellus redivivus" Andrewbogott (talk) 17:58, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that most people who are interested in Panagrellus are raising them as food for aquarium fish. Aquaculture hobbyists raise Turbatrix aceti as well, which is also of interest to people who make vinegar and fermented foods. Aquaculture hobbyists aren't necessarily precise in which common names they apply to which species, and it doesn't help that this Wikipedia article has been misinforming the public for years. Some aquaculture hobbyists are precise though: aquariumcoop.com has separate articles on raising microworms and vinegar eels; CFLAS also distinguishes microworms and vinegar worms as well as walter worms (another Panagrellus species). Panagrellus are raised in a moist starchy medium (e.g. oatmeal). Turbatrix is raised in a liquid medium, vinegar. Vinegar eels are not Panagrellus. Whatever confusion may exist in the aquarium world isn't unraveled by having "vinegar eel" redirect to this article.Plantdrew (talk) 21:53, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Vinegar Eels?
Talk:Ted Serong

message: This article is editorialised and does not read like an encyclopedia entry. It seems like it has been lifted from a biography or a magazine article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.37.186.94 (talk) 23:37, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: FWIW this has been completely re-written now. Anotherclown (talk) 02:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Tone
Talk:2002 FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA)

message: There should be a better explanation for Why Ireland went into the UEFA / AFC Intercontinental Play-off.  For Example, was the group that would go to this play-off pre-set, was it to do with the rankings of the runners-up, or something else?  I don't know the answer myself - but the answer should be added to give a better explanation.  2A02:C7D:15A:AB00:CC4E:368E:82AA:7D5E (talk) 18:39, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ireland 
Talk:Privacy-enhancing technologies

message: This could go on the criticism section, possibly. Privacy Enhancing Technologies have had intense academic research, but very little of it actually reached the market. The article
 talks a bit about it in the section "The "Failure" of PETs" 
Cratophonos (talk) 13:17, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Section on PETs Failure
Talk:Bahram Aryana

message: Bahram Aryana is in the "Iranian collaborators with Nazi Germany" category, but there's nothing in the article which refers to this. FUNBORM (talk) 02:09, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nazi collaboration?
Talk:Barbara Whinnery

message: American Profile is a Sunday insert in major American papers and hence is a secondary source meeting WP:RS. The Acting Place page is the official page of the place at which she works--primary, perhaps, but still a source. I consider IMDb fairly reliable. What more is desired? JJL (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable Sources 
Talk:Steal syndrome

message: I split these articles on purpose to avoid confusion with subclavian steal syndrome.  Steal syndrome is a disambiguation and marked as such for this reason.  A merge does not make sense and would only confuse the two different steal syndromes (vascular access steal syndrome and subclavian steal syndrome).  I removed the merge tags. Nephron  T|C 16:47, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge of ''vascular access steal syndrome'' and ''steal syndrome''
Talk:Psychotronic Video

message: Somebody should bio Michael J. Weldon.
He, essentially, is Psychotronic Video, and he was the original drummer for Ohio's seminal punk ensemble "Mirrors."—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.55.109.95 (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Would it be worth mentioning that the Psychotronic Film Guide helped inspire the creation of Mystery Science Theater 3000, as mentioned in this interview? Kouban (talk) 19:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MST3K
Talk:Basis Technology

message: I have added some internal links, added an External Links section and added inline refs to the text, also edits to text to make it less 'advert like'. I have therefore removed the 
advert|article and Wikify|date=March 2007 notices, but will add a stub notice, since the article clearly needs expanding or rewriting  but I'll leave that to others that might know more about the company background etc.Ray3055 (talk) 22:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikify and Advert notice removal
Talk:Shigeto Tsuru

message: Virtually the entire text of the article appears to have been very closely paraphrased from Tsuru's book Japan's Capitalism: Creative Defeat and Beyond. --DAJF (talk) 14:34, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Close paraphrasing
Talk:Abersoch

message: starting a dialogue relating to pages should only really stay in their relevant page's talk, by going to their personal pages does nothing but antagonise editors who wish to help add to wiki pages, so please stick to this talk if you have any queries or issues relating tothe 'Abersoch' page, diolch Hogyncymru (talk) 22:45, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with editors? use this place instead of their userpage 

message: Oh dear, it looks like the Plaid Cymru nationalists have had a bash at this page.  Please could someone with a couple of brain cells re-write this article …   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.195.191.50 (talk) 20:03, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "English Immigration"

message: {text originality at :User talk:Hogyncymru and put here at their prompting.)
I know that feelings run high and that the closure of the school was a big blow to the community, but...... the standards of Wikipedia don't change because of that. I have removed the obvious POV and unsourced contentious statements. You might want to consider removing the image of a roundabout unless there is a good source that unequivocally links the passage of chalets to Abersoch with the removal of the roundabout. Thanks  Velella  Velella Talk   22:05, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither the original "The Guardian" article, nor the opinion piece in the "Daily Post" about that article, mentioned anything about mono-lingual signs, so, yes, it is POV.  Velella  Velella Talk   23:01, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: So if 1000 people walked into a shop and saw exactly the same, would it be classed as 'POV'? Hogyncymru (talk) 23:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia remains based on what reliable and independent sources say.  Velella  Velella Talk   23:05, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: my question was hypothetical, for the sake of documenting on wiki, of course you need evidence to back it up, however, I know you'll reply, but I shan't carry on the dialogue, nos da. Hogyncymru (talk) 23:08, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edits
Talk:HVR Consulting Services Ltd.

message: I don't think this should be a redirect.  When QinetiQ bought HVR it was a new story in the Financial Times; when QinetiQ got rid of the original management is was also a news story in the Financial Times.  These were not stubs - they were proper stories.  The Financial Times believed that QinetiQ's acquisition of HVR was important.
I think there is enough information out there do turn the original stub article on HVR into a reasonably good article.  If the Financial Times thought that HVR was notable, that should be good enough for Wikipedia.
I have put the article in its 15 March state below:--Toddy1 (talk) 08:42, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Should this be a redirect
Talk:Artificial Limb & Appliance Service

message: A great start to this article. As someone from the U.S., however, some of terms were unknown to me (i.e. all the government agencies). It's probably unnecessary to explain all of them, but pointing out anything that's significant or unusual that might not be obvious to non-Brits would be helpful. Also, some of the medical terms were a bit confusing (i.e. pathology)...can we change those to more commonly understood descriptions? The list of services would probably be more useful if written in a paragraph style with a bit more description added for the more comprehensive services...lists and bulleted points don't seem to be as big on Wikipedia as the rest of the internet. And if there are any articles about the service from major pubs that meet reliable source guidelines, such as the bbc or the guardian, they'd help with notability. I'll be happy to help dig those up. Flowanda | Talk 17:12, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing and terms
Talk:United States Marine Corps Physical Fitness Test

message: Why are the excercises different for women?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.98.58.121 (talk) 09:06, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In a crunch the lower back remains on the floor, making it impossible for the arms to touch the thighs. The exercise described is therefore a sit-up rather than a crunch. Which one are marines tested on; the one named, or the one described?
I believe this is the source of the misinformation:
:The order referenced by the page (MCO 6100.13) says crunches. So now the question is do we use the Marine Corps' terminology?Jklharris (talk) 20:57, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do marines do [[Sit-up (exercise)|sit-ups]] or [[crunch_(exercise)|crunches]]? 

message: A brief timeline of the MCOs that define the PFT:
* MCO 6100.13 (08 Aug 2008) cancelled MCO 6100.12
* MCO 6100.12 (10 May 2002) cancelled MCO 6100.3J
* MCO 6100.3J (28 Feb 1988) cancelled MCO 6100.3H
I was only able to locate the documents for MCOs going back to MCO 6100.3J , and that MCO also has the verbiage "over reasonably level ground" for the run.
MCOs prior to a certain date appear to be scarce online.  MCO 6100.3H was published on 23-Oct-1980, as per Navy report 87-26 
It would seem that the "Old Corps" style run would either be defined in MCO 6100.3H or else in an older MCO that was cancelled on or before 23-Oct-1980.
Bobert G (talk) 20:52, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Old Corps" run versus the current run 

message: I added the 5K run.--98.88.130.56 (talk) 21:31, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You added it in three places, it was overkill. It only needs to be linked in the section about the actual run. And in general, links integrated into the body text are preferred to using "See also". – Smyth\talk 14:41, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  5K run
Talk:Bacterial transcription

message: how big is the prokaryotic cell?
do you need a microscope to see it?
what does it look like? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.246.193.123 (talk) 
:The page on prokaryotes talks a bit about that.  It says they range from 10-4m to 10-7m.  I doubt any of these would be visible by the naked eye - 10-4 may be a dot - I don't know.  Read the page on prokaryotes for more info though. --PhiJ (talk) 19:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Size

message: I removed a lot of plagiarized material from this article. I found the website that it was copied from word for word... here is the link: https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Microbiology/Book%3A_Microbiology_(Boundless)/7%3A_Microbial_Genetics/7.06%3A_Translation%3A_Protein_Synthesis/7.6C%3A_Prokaryotic_Transcription_and_Translation_Are_Coupled
I paraphrased some of the information and properly cited this source.
Ashleystrenko (talk) 12:52, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information Removed
Talk:Pressure frying

message: With a pressure cooker, the high pressure increases the boiling point of water within the vessel, which of course heats the food more quickly due to the greater temperature differential.
I was under the impression that deep frying by conventional means already brings the cooking oil itself near the point of chemical breakdown, partial oxidation to long-chain aldehydes, thermal depolymerization and subsequent graphitization of the carbon from the long carbon chains, etc.  At higher temperatures and pressures wouldn't this happen even more quickly?
:No. The working oil temperature of a pressure fryer is not higher than that of a standard fryer. Quicker cooking is realized by not allowing heat to bleed off the food in the form of steam. --Sneftel (talk) 15:09, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No because a pressure fryer gets way hotter than a pressure cooker. Almost 75% more heat, which might cause your pressure cooker to fail. They are safe for use with water only, thats why there are special pressure fryers out there in the first place. --95.88.156.189 (talk) 05:44, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not sure I understand 

message: I removed the following content
It has been argued that the laws of physics dictate that, like water, oil that is heated under a pressure of 15 psi (103 kPa) cannot possibly become hotter than 121 °C (250 °F).
This makes no sense, oil can get considerably hotter than 121°C under pressure or at atmospheric pressure, this is an accepted fact. I've replaced it with a general statement about how pressure cooker gaskets are only designed for 121°C --124.149.163.27 (talk) 09:14, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed text 

message: As stated in WP:UNIT “In science-related articles: generally use only SI units, non-SI units officially accepted for use with the SI, and specialized units that are used in some sciences. US Customary and imperial units are not required.”  PlanCartesien (talk) 02:12, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Units

message: This article about pressure frying would be improved if it contained a photo of an actual pressure fryer.   While the photo of the resulting pressure fried chicken is nice, showing the actual cooking vessel might be more relevant to this article.T bonham (talk) 03:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo needed
Talk:Tax patent

message: :Discussion from user talk pages, and copied here, since it may be of interest to other contributors.
Ed,  Thanks for your edits to tax patent.  You are absolutely right about original research.  I know I was pushing it, but I wanted to make the point that it wasn't just the US.  The patents I listed are the foreign equivalents of US patents that have been classified by the USPTO as 705/36T.
Since I'm not aware of any references that talk about tax patents outside of the US, I thought I would step up to the plate and write an article on it.  Any suggestions for a publication that might be interested?
In the meantime, feel free to delete the OR if you feel is it inappropriate.--Nowa (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your message on my talk page. As far as I can remember, I haven't read anything on tax patents in Europe. It seems to be a purely US topic so far. If I find anything written on this, I will add a section. We can't just rely on original research. Otherwise, it is a very interesting article. Thanks for enlighting me (and others) on this subject. --Edcolins (talk) 17:31, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Research

message: A decision has been rendered in the Bilski case. Stay tuned..... Famspear (talk) 01:07, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bilski case

message: I added a section on the bill passed by the U.S. Congress on September 8, 2011, that includes a provision that would essentially prohibit tax patents. It's the "Leahy-Smith America Invents Act." Once the bill is signed into law by the President (assuming that happens), more modifications to the article can be made. It looks like the bill would not impair the validity of tax patents already granted. Famspear (talk) 04:01, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! Very good edit. --Edcolins (talk) 08:49, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome. Famspear (talk) 12:32, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S. Congress passes bill to prohibit tax patents
Category talk:American Speed Association drivers

message: I want to add a driver to the "H" category. How do I do that?
:At the very bottom of the driver's article, there is a category section. You would need to add Category:American Speed Association drivers. Otherwise, you could post the driver's name here, and I'll take care of it. If there is no a  in the section, then add that template too. DEFAULTSORT takes care of the alphabetizing by last name. Royalbroil 19:44, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Morgan Paull

message: please extend this article, the guy's got a long filmographyCapt Jim (talk) 17:51, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article says he lived near Los Angeles until death, but that he died at his home in Oregon.  So where did he live?  And how did he get from New York to California (or Oregon)?John Paul Parks (talk) 16:46, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Residence Facts Confusing