lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Regions of New South Wales

message: From my reading of the Shoalhaven pages, it seems that that area is part of South Coast. But both have categories here.  Is there a list of non-overlapping regions? Robin Patterson (talk) 12:31, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This discussion's been had on AWNB previously. We never came to an appropriate resolution which met Wikipedia's standards - ABS's categories are entirely their own. Riverina, South Coast, Central Coast, Hunter, Illawarra and the Blue Mountains are the only clear regions although their boundaries are not officially defined and considerable confusion exists at the edges. Orderinchaos 02:06, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Overlapping regions

message: No such list is apparent here. Anyone wanting such a list can look at the Genealogy Wikia, which bases its regions outside Greater Sydney on those defined by the Department of Local Government (and having much in common with Australian Bureau of Statistics districts). Each region has an article and at least one category. Settlements and even counties are being listed in steadily growing numbers. Robin Patterson (talk) 12:22, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This discussion's been had on AWNB previously. We never came to an appropriate resolution which met Wikipedia's standards - ABS's categories are entirely their own. Riverina, South Coast, Central Coast, Hunter, Illawarra and the Blue Mountains are the only clear regions although their boundaries are not officially defined and considerable confusion exists at the edges. Orderinchaos 02:06, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-overlapping regions
Talk:Toszek

message: I've reverted edits by the usual anon user who gets away with POV pushing on numerous article pages.radek (talk) 19:33, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Usual anon" is no reason to delete sourced information about the NKWD prison camp :pl:Obóz NKWD w Toszku. You better restore. -- Matthead  Discuß   00:38, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Information about the NKVD camp is still in the article. What are you talking about?radek (talk) 00:41, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

text: BTW, could you perhaps suggest to the "usual anon" that s/he should register and edit properly rather than engage in what is essentially vandalism. Perhaps s/he is more likely to listen to advice from you than from others.radek (talk) 00:43, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "You better restore". Matthead, with all respect, you are using this "You better restore" phrase for a second time. You said that to me not that long ago and I pointed that out to you already, remember?. To say, "You better restore it" in English language is very RUDE. I think that you are right about the NKWD prison camp but please say it in the nice way. Thanks.--Jacurek (talk) 05:55, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usual anon 
Talk:Tolkmicko

message: The site was first settled by Slavic Prussian tribes.
— I believe what is meant is Baltic Prussian tribes, i.e. the Old Prussians, who were conquered and Germanized in the 13th and 14th centuries by the Teutonic Knights.
Sca (talk) 00:27, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Slavic?
Talk:Myxococcus xanthus

message: I removed the "too much jargon" tag because the article doesn't use any terms that aren't linked to other pages for explanation.  If you disagree, put the Jargon sign back up. (Eclarep (talk) 21:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

message: Pooyan, I know that you are really trying to help, BUT
# Plagiarism is not allowed
# Content must be sourced.
I would like to help. Perhaps you can put your proposed contributions on this talk page, and Gargoyle, Ruby and I can help put them into acceptable form. You need some practice learning the proper way of making contributions that are up to Wikipedia standards. Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 14:09, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contributions have to be in your own words. Unsourced and Copyvio not allowed. 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jennifer Walker (talk) 21:29, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: MIBO 3500 Introduction to Microbiology

message: Our team has moved our work from our sandbox to the live article. We reworked most of the article in terms of organization but kept much of the content the same. Previous sections were changed to subsections in the larger headings of Microbiology and Complex Behaviors. Morphology, environment, and metabolism sections were added under Microbiology. More content was added to existing sections as well. To see our edit history, see User:Jkim777/Myxococcus xanthus. 
Jkim777 (talk) 19:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mibo 3500 Sandbox Move
Talk:Holography (disambiguation)

message: 2007-07-05-valentín spindler -
look also the use of -hologram- in the articles:
M.Talbot - D.J.Bohm - K.Pribram  -  
all this ref. "The Universe As A Hologram" etc.
62.37.237.168 11:42, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rajgród

message: what was undue about Encyclopedia of Camps and Ghettos, 1933–1945? Isn't that one of the most important sources on the subject? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 00:16, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with your restore. Yes, this is one of typical examples mentioned in the article by Grabowsky. Assuming this is all reliably sourced, I would certainly keep such content. But is it really a malice by GizzyCatBella or just removal of content that is arguably undue on the page? This a page about city. Yes, the atrocities by Nazi should be mentioned (as she did), but should they be described on a half of the page? Is this city so famous specifically for the German atrocities? No one objected to this removal. Such edit would never be as a reason for sanctions, for example on WP:AE. My very best wishes (talk) 23:12, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  My problem is actually more with removing the source than removing the content, if they'd just reduced the content and kept the same sources we wouldn't be having this discussion. How do you remove the best source in the article on due weight grounds? AGF would say thats carelessness, incompetence, or stupidity, to get to malice you have to not AGF. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 20:07, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

text: In other words, someone (Icewhiz) is inserting huge sections about Nazi atrocities into pages about every Polish town. Is not that POV-pushing? Personally, I do not object it, but maybe that's because I have a similar POV? My very best wishes (talk) 23:25, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Such content should be split into a subarticle if it is too long and independently notable, but here, I don't see a particular problem with it remaining. Although eventually this event should likely have a dedicated subarticle, as it does on pl wiki: :pl:Pogrom w Rajgrodzie. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:10, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

text:  Bad editing does not excuse bad editing. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 20:11, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue?
Talk:Prószków

message: My addition to the site was a simple clarification. The Polish source material which states Leopold died, ending the counthood, is being misinterpreted. The family (male lineage) did not go extinct; it did not end with Leopold. Proof of this is in a plethora of family bibles, letters, church records of birth, baptism, marriage, death and burial, and so on, from Prussia, Silesia, Bohemia, Moravia, Upper Hungary (now Slovakia), Galicia, etc. This multitude of sources would be difficult to cite as source material as it is not compiled into one unit. 
The major point is that the source material in Polish is primarily detailing the faience manufacturing aspect of the family in Silesia. It is not a comprehensive history of the town, but that is what this wiki article details. The Polish source material is also not a comprehensive history of the family, but it is inadvertently being used as such:  the wiki article on the town (namesake of the family) is claiming said family is extinct, when it is not. The source material is being "stretched" to suggest or claim points which are not indeed facts. That needed to be remedied. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.121.217.235 (talk) 
:I have no strong view on the issue, but if you are, as you suggest, using primary sources, then you must be cautious - it is generally improper to make one's own conclusions based on primary material (as, especially in this case, it can't be easily verified). A secondary source (which can be more easily cited) would be ideal. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs)  14:22, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't read Polish so I absolutely cannot help. My point on primary sources stands. I have instead asked editors at WikiProject Poland if they could help with this. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs)  17:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

text: The text says in part that Leopold was killed in a duel and nothing about him being the last descendant of anything. I am not going to read the whole book, because this detail is completely irrelevant to the subject, so I am removing it from the article. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:34, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits
Talk:Poniatowa

message: The quotation from Konrad Morgen is not, as indicated in the footnote, from an affidavit submitted by Morgen to the IMT. It is a quotation from a report that he submitted at the time of the Poniatowa massacre; in the volume cited, the report is being quoted by the interrogator of Ernst Kaltenbrunner in a pre-trial deposition; and it does not contain the words "6,000 Jews and 9,500 Jewesses". I hesitate to make these corrections without knowing whether the author of this item has an alternative source of the quotation. User talk:Jdvelleman 14:24, 26 May 2011 (CET)
I'm not sure Jdvellman has this quite right. Back when, I asked Raul Hilberg about the provenance of Morgen's "testimony". He told me it was the result of a series of questions (about Poniatowa) PUT TO Morgen by Allied interrogators at Nuremburg; Hilberg supplied me with a copy of the interrogation transcript, and there Morgen gave the inmate population numbers...which accord quite closely with those given by other authorities, e.g.,Artur Podgorski, "Arbeitslager in Poniatowa 1941-43", JEWISH HISTORICAL QUARTERLY QUARTERLY, 2010/#4, pp. 443-44. The Prosecution at the Trial then attempted to use this account against Kaltenbrunner, but that angle failed because Harvest Festival was entirely an SS/Order Police operation...no SD (Kaltenbrunner's men) were involved and he knew nothing about it. It did not, in short "implicate Kaltenbrunner" at all, and this I suspect is the reason why Morgen's otherwise significant account was shunted off into one of the Supplement volumes. I can see why (someone) cut most of Morgen's account of the mass shooting from this article, which is, after all, about the long-term history of the city of Poniatowa, not the Jewish labor camp per se. But, in this connection, am also wondering why the strict chronology of the article was also changed around to put the wartime labor camp part last, instead of adhering to the prior, straight chronology of pre-war deep history, then WW II, then postwar. I think the original sequence should be restored.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seadragonconquerer (talk • contribs) 07:24, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotation from Morgen
Talk:Pelplin

message: It is mostly notable due to brutal extermination of Polish priests and destruction of all traces of Polish culture in the Abbey by Germans in 1939, known as Bloody Pelpin Autumn.Probably should be noted in the article.--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 01:52, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Site of Bloody Pelpin Autumn 1939 
Talk:Orneta

message: why did we make train station on Orneta? Piggy8384 (talk) 13:45, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plan 

message: It is really important that Wikipedia does not permit the fanatical Polish nationalists to rewrite history as they would like to see it, and to erase historical fact. There are far too many of these pages on the English-language Wikipedia and the only sources are unreadable Polish sources. 2A00:23C4:B617:7D01:78BA:52F0:F44E:FBFE (talk) 07:22, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Propaganda
Talk:Irish Anti-Partition League

message: According to the Keele University website (http://www.psr.keele.ac.uk/area/uk/ge51/i08.htm), in the 1951 general election, Fermanagah and South Tyrone was won by an Anti-Partition candidate. This seems to contradict the article (which suggests that the League won no Westminster seats) but I'm wary of making changes in an area where others are probably more knowledgeable. Widmerpool (talk) 06:32, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The candidate that was elected was Cahir Healy a member of the Nationalist party, but also a member of the Anti-Partition League, although he stood in the election for the Nationalist party.--Padraig (talk) 09:12, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 1951 election
Talk:Differential Ability Scales

message: You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of  Intelligence Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in these issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by  suggesting new sources through comments on that page. It will be extremely helpful for articles on human intelligence to edit them according to the  Wikipedia standards for reliable sources for medicine-related articles, as it is important to get these issues as well verified as possible. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 02:50, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intelligence Citations Bibliography for Articles Related to IQ Testing
Talk:Oasis Academy Brislington

message: I didn't create the original page but oppose the speedy deletion tag. Although the page was badly formed the college referred to is significant and listed on List of schools in Bristol. I have started to improve/expand the article & I suspect those with a specialist knowledge/interest in education from the WikiProject Bristol will do more.— Rod talk 12:10, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lunch time

message: I have not written this article, which is indeed patent nonsense. I think this is a subject that can be discussed in Wikipedia, as it is an interesting topic in for example Consumer science. A small stub will appear on the article in a bit. --User:Krator (t c) 12:17, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have redirected it to Lunch for the time being. Feel free to change it back to an article in its own right if you have enough useful content for a stub though. ~Matticus TC 12:27, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Made a stub. I will try to find some good papers on lunch times. --User:Krator (t c) 12:30, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're too dang fast for me!! :) ~Matticus TC 12:55, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hangon
Talk:N,N-Diisopropylethylamine

message: How can the melting point be 0.00 Kelvin? Absurd.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.64.159.194 (talk) 22:53, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

message: what about the toxicity of this compound? why is it so toxic when it's just an amine ? 2601:40F:601:4060:D0A2:2D8C:41A9:6B37 (talk) 00:38, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  toxicity
Talk:North Idaho College

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for North Idaho College: The proper address is 1000 West Garden Avenue, Coeur d'Alene. This should be 47.676745,-116.796341 according to Google Maps; that is on campus, anyway. The current position is not even close. —Waded (talk) 12:32, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: —Coords now point at Lee-Kildow Hall, the administration building for the college. Regards, TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 15:08, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: I would like to add all the programs offered at NIC. Toothscraper (talk) 20:49, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't. This is an encyclopedia article, not a copy of the college's academic catalog. You may find it helpful to view our advice for college and university articles. ElKevbo (talk) 23:39, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Instructional Programs 

message: The situation with administration and accreditation needs to be updated and kept current. 2600:6C67:1C00:5F7E:9C05:1C61:54C5:2166 (talk) 17:15, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to change it.  We encourage you to be bold in updating pages, because wikis like ours develop faster when everybody edits. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. You can always preview your edits before you publish them or test them out in the sandbox. If you need additional help, check out our getting started page or ask the friendly folks at the Teahouse.   ElKevbo (talk) 21:31, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed 

message: I know we "can" leave these details to their bios, as stated as reason for deletion here. We "can" also completely leave out mention of them. We "can" also leave out what they do, if we include them. We "can" also include years of birth for each person - as is quite common, of course, across the project. The edits summary imho does not provide adequate support for a deletion here .. it's just this sort of thing that drives otherwise helpful editors from signing up for and contributing to the project. If an editor wants to delete, they should in edit summary indicate a wp rationale for deletion. Rather than a subjective editor "my view is..." 2603:7000:2101:AA00:64B0:AD58:68CD:DDE (talk) 23:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletions
Talk:John Alexander McCreery

message: I suspect this article may be a hoax.  For one of the "top ten" surgeons, it is strange that the only relevant Google hits appear to derive from this article.  Arkady Renkov (talk) 16:57, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A Google book search indicates that a doctor of this name existed, and that he graduated from Harvard (). I can find only passing mention though. I can not tell if he is "notable". The only assertion of notability in the article is the very odd "top ten" comment. Wasted Oompa-Loompa (talk) 16:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

text: I now see that you are concerned with the articles created by User talk:GoldsboroughRavenshaw. I think you may be on to something. Charles I. McColough is an easier article to pull apart with all the claims it makes, unlike this one where only one ambiguous claim is made. Wasted Oompa-Loompa (talk) 16:53, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoax?
Talk:2007 South American U-17 Championship

message: Can someone confirm whether the Fabio mentioned in the article is Fabio Silva who plays for Fluminense and is to join Manchester United. I am 99% sure that is the case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.206.93.195 (talk • contribs) 12:30, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was. Richard3120 (talk) 15:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Fabio
Talk:Toughsheet Community Stadium

message: The article states that the stadium is in Bolton, but Middlebrook Retail Park is in Horwich, so which is correct? - Dudesleeper talk 19:46, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like I have restored this when I reached the article on my watchlist, have just got to this change so did not realise it had been queried. I reverted back to Horwich as per the address and updated the URL for the reference. Keith D (talk) 00:12, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middlebrook 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (closed by non-admin page mover)   * Pppery * it has begun... 01:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: University of Bolton Stadium →  – Name of stadium changed on 1 July but page already created as a redirect to stop premature renaming of page Quentin X (talk) 14:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Link here from the club itself.https://www.bwfc.co.uk/news/2023/february/the-toughsheet-community-stadium/ The image in the infobox of the page actually has a photo of the stadium with the new name on it. Quentin X (talk) 17:31, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

text: *comment - bolton wanderers stadium was never used. uefa policy against sponsors was not a thing in 2005 and 2007 when bolton played in the uefa cup. in fact, they just straight up never even referred to it as the bolton wanderers stadium here is ever single match report from uefa for bolton wanderers home matches in the uefa cup ]         every single one uses reebok stadium. whoever added bolton wanderers stadium made it up based on the fact they were anti sponsor later. based on this information, i am removing this made up name hoax from the page. there are 9 sources here from uefa all calling it reebok stadium, bolton stadium is not a real name its a name made up by some guy on wikipedia. he simply saw uefa's later rule and decided to add it to bolton, without it acutally being true as it did not apply in those years. as such, this oppose isnt valid.Muur (talk) 07:58, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 July 2023
Talk:Yield spread

message: This page is very similar to an existing page on yield curve spread. Finnancier 12:35, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Belated thanks. Yield curve spread now re-directs to a disambiguation page, which links to several articles including Yield spread. The related articles are also listed in Yield spread#See also. —Patrug (talk) 22:49, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge with [[yield curve spread]]?

message: Dr. Hughes Hallett has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Hughes Hallett has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Pietro Alessandrini & Michele Fratianni & Andrew Hughes Hallett & Andrea Filippo Presbitero, 2012. "External imbalances and financial fragility in the euro area," Mo.Fi.R. Working Papers 66, Money and Finance Research group (Mo.Fi.R.) - Univ. Politecnica Marche - Dept. Economic and Social Sciences.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 19:49, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Belated thanks. I recently incorporated Hallett's comments into the article. —Patrug (talk) 22:49, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Hughes Hallett's comment on this article
Talk:Rusnano

message: If anyone got some free time and clear head, it worth investigating if it's possible to open a 'Critics" section. Altrough critics of mr'Putin's initiatives are hard to find in Russia, and western ones tend to be somewhat off.
It should be possible to find a plausable reference on the issue of the whole "nanotechnology in russia" theme being a PR\budgeting project somewhere in lines with american SOI, e.g. not so much actual science as talks, politics and budget spendings.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.141.155.11 (talk) 02:19, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hype" issue. 'Critics" section needed. 

message: #REDIRECT Russian Corporation of Nanotechnology  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.232.34.1 (talk) 16:12, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rusnano 

message: The official name of the company seems to be now simply RUSNANO. Shouldn't the article be renamed to Rusnano? I would support using non-capital letters, though. RIA Novosti also spells it "Rusnano" instead of "RUSNANO". Unless someone opposes, I will move the article to "Rusnano" soon. Nanobear (talk) 13:30, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to "Rusnano"? 