Talk:Consent in BDSM

message: What bearing does the picture have on the article, other than that it is, broadly, a BDSM picture and this is a BDSM article?♥ «Charles A. L.» (talk) 03:33, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture relevance? 

message: The section labeled "Consentual non-consent is pretty clearly describing TPE. You'd be hard pressed to find anyone in the scene that agrees with the definition presented in this article. 174.49.194.142 (talk) 21:44, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I edited the page to reflect this. UncommonGray (talk) 22:41, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

text: CNC does not specifically exclude safewords, and the current definition that does not mention safewords is problematic and dangerous. CNC is the one type of play where the majority of people in the BDSM community consider safewords to be essential. There are obviously people who believe that CNC can be practiced without a safeword, but they are in the minority. FlameHel (talk) 17:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consentual Non-Consent vs. Total Power Exchange 

message: Someone with a better understanding of it should edit in information about SSC (Safe, Sane, Conensual) and RACK (Risk Aware Consensual Kink). I admit I have only a passing familiarity with the concepts, but they're cornerstones of consent in BDSM communities. UncommonGray (talk) 22:43, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  SSC / RACK? 

message: Hey please bear with me while I work on this. There is so much wrong with this article. A huge example is consent is COMPLETELY NOT a defense in most places. The legal section was written by some armchair lawyer that doesn't understand things. The NCSF makes it clear in their Consent Counts campaign that it's not legal at all in the States for example. And the section itself mentions the Spanner case where it's not legal in the UK. It's not legal at all in any Anglophone country. And it's not just sexual stuff. Really it's most of the physical stuff like whipping and whatnot. Anyways please be patient with me as I work on this. If I am doing something wrong according to Wikipedia please leave me a message and explain. I have a pretty good idea of what I'm doing but I'm not really familiar with all the rules and there's so many and so much of them that it's super intimidating. I'll probably break some without realizing since they're so byzantine and crazy expansive. If I do tell me and I'll make it right. --Kinkykitteh (talk) 07:51, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Working to make it better 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Consent (BDSM). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090901004229/http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/dictionary/Consensual-nonconsent/ to http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/dictionary/Consensual-nonconsent/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929001428/http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/boards/activism/137937/ to http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/boards/activism/137937/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:37, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  SkyWarrior 01:53, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Consent (BDSM) →  – The parenthetically-qualified syntax implies that consent is a distinct phrase or concept in BDSM compared to other contexts. The article does not bear that out, and rather begins with "consent within BDSM", later defining the term as "an explicit agreement to acts, terms and conditions"—the same definition as applies in non-BDSM contexts.
To avoid the erroneous implication that consent in BDSM is distinct from consent in general, we should move to Consent in BDSM, which is a more natural title anyways.  -- Tamzin[cetacean needed]  (she/they) 00:27, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 August 2021