Talk:English orthography

message: In Irish place names, /ɒx/ (for most speakers merged with /ɒk/) spelled “ough” is a common anglicisation of Irish ach(a), och(a), uach etc., e.g. Glendalough /ˌɡlɛndəˈlɒx/, Ardclough /ɑːr(d)ˈklɒx/, Loughrea /lɒxˈreɪ/, Loughmoe /lɒxˈmoʊ/. But on this page it is listed as an exceptional one word pronunciation in "lough". Maybe it should be added to the "typical pronunciations" list? Also, in Oughterard (another place name), ough represents /uːx/, is this applicable for the one word exception list? 2A01:B340:86:C412:485C:1635:9B2A:A464 (talk) 22:12, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ough in Irish place names 

message: I suspect this is a side-effect of a link somewhere in the article to an Israel-related page, but it seems rather unusual to have the page image be the flag of a country whose official language is not English. Is there a way to fix this? -- LWG talk 01:43, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's the result of vandalism to a module that was transcluded on the page. It's been reverted and the cache updated so it seems to have gone away. Nardog (talk) 02:10, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the hover-page preview for this article the Israeli flag? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Emmasarkan (talk) 20:39, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Linguistics in the Digital Age

message: Proper nouns in English are capitalised and non-italicised, which may have caused the confusion that these foreign proper nouns are English words. Frankly, they are not English words as they are romanisations of foreign languages, and do not follow existing English orthotactics. Thus, I'm fairly certain that they should be removed or moved into a different list under the grounds of not being English -- English speakers usually require a sound guide or be seperately taught how to pronounce these words, and the fact that they exist on the page merely clutters and complicates the list.  Sidesyci (talk) 02:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Wehrmacht', 'Dzongha', 'Nietzschean' and 'Qin' is generally considered to be not English orthography 

message: The Spelling-to-sound correspondences section "Combinations of vowel letters" contains the typical pronunciation of each vowel letter combination in all possible environments, including when followed by <r>, which is nearly always a separate category requiring a separate row. However, there is also a section "Combinations of vowel letters and ⟨r⟩" which contains the same information as was in the "when followed by <r>" rows of "Combinations of vowel letters" . This is unnecessary duplication of information, and means that any edit to the "vowel letter followed by <r>" pronunciation has to be made in two places. It runs the risk of an editor making an edit in one of the tables and neglecting to make it in the other one, resulting in the information getting out-of-sync.
We do not need to list the information twice, so we should either remove the "before <r>" rows from the "Combinations of vowel letters" table, or remove the "Combinations of vowel letters and ⟨r⟩" table altogether. Since the "Combinations of vowel letters" table is incredibly long and cluttered, not helped by nearly always requiring a separate "before <r>" row, sometimes multiple "before <r>" rows, for each vowel letter combination, I propose the former. Remove the "before <r>" rows from the "Combinations of vowel letters" table, adding a note that this excludes when followed by <r>. We can then have the "Combinations of vowel letters and ⟨r⟩" table as the sole home of this information, which will be a lot more readable and eliminate the unnecessary duplication and editing problems that I mentioned. Offa29 (talk) 12:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication of information on vowel letters followed by <r>