lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Egg (roundabout)

message: It's been referenced in a few places on Wikipedia (The Egg (disambig.), Roundabout and Magic Roundabout (Hemel Hempstead), so I thought it may as well have its own article. I can't find much information about it though - it's known as "The Egg" in Google Earth Hacks and in a forum post, Ankerdrive in the survey by Saga and on a list of fun junctions, and both on Road To Nowhere, since deleted (Google Cache). SABRE makes reference to Ankerdrive island here and here. The reason I didn't title it "Ankerdrive" is that all the map data and Fixtures Live suggest that Ankerdrive is a part of the roundabout, but not the roundabout itself. Does anyone have more authoritative sources? Elektron 13:47, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Egg/Ankerdrive 

message: I don't see what all the fuss is about. I've driven round the egg plenty of times and there's nothing wrong with it. Also it's far, far too big to be considered a round about in it's own right. It's more of a weird ring road. MatthewFP 14:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Egg User 

message: I propose that The Egg (roundabout) be merged into Tamworth, Staffordshire. I propose this a I don't think a single roundabout is big enough to have its own article and I think it could easily just fit into its own section on the Tamworth article. C. 22468   Talk to me 14:37, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Xylopia richardii

message: The photo on the page shows a snowman, not the flower.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.201.155.2 (talk) 18:57, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Talk:EFCO

message: This article needs attention  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.252.70.195 (talk) 19:03, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

message: I would like to open a discussion to find out in what ways this article is written like an Advertisement and what content should be changed to ensure it's neutral standpoint.
I hope to hear from Alksub on this subject who tagged it as such.
--Lumber Jack second account 21:35, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This looks like it was stolen from the marketing materials for the company. Probably entirely written by the company themselves. 173.27.50.201 (talk) 19:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag Advertisement 

message: IMHO this company is very notable for it's sector.  However, I would like to invite everyone intrested to share their views on EFCO's importants. I hope to hear from Alksub on this subject who questionend it's importance with a notability tag.
In the meantime here is a some info given for the World of Concrete (the most important Construction fair in North America) EFCO corp.
--Lumber Jack second account 21:46, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: EFCO is very notable in construction area. --Manop - TH (talk) 19:18, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: That IP is owned by EFCO. They're turning this into a marketing piece for them. 
If it can't be rewritten without those contributions, the page should be deleted. 173.27.50.201 (talk) 19:49, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  All revisions or additions made by 65.164.105.62
Talk:Mycolactone

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://iai.asm.org/content/73/6/3307. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 17:17, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Matayoshi Kobudo

message: Itokazu sensei has retired as the chief instructor of the Matayoshi Kodokan Hombu Dojo.  He now heads his own organization called "Matayoshi Kobudo Shinbukai" - The "Shin" character recognizes the Matayoshi lineage such as Shinko and Shinpo Matayoshi.  As of right now, I do not know if there is another chief instructor appointed yet, only that the head students currently run classes on their own. 73.217.52.67 (talk) 07:40, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matayoshi Lineage
Talk:Zanthoxylum integrifoliolum

message: Though also the UICN list mentions the name Zanthoxylum integrifoliolum, it seems the correct name is Zanthoxylum integrifolium
(See the for instance http://tai2.ntu.edu.tw/upennimage/label/998%20UpennSpecimen/687/68733.jpg , or better, check out the Spanish wiki page, which has the correct name, plus some references.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iloiloman (talk • contribs) 15:16, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correctness of name 
Talk:Molniya-1 No.2

message: According to some sources, including Encyclopedia Astronautica and Gunter's Space Page, the launch on 4 June 1964 was a Molniya communications satellite. In fact, I can find very little reference to a Zond mission on that date outside of Wikipedia and its mirrors. The only one I could find is the one that this article references, which is entitled "Tentatively Identified Missions and Launch Failures" - I think that title speaks for itself in terms of the reliability of the source. Is there any other evidence to support this being a Zond mission, not a Molniya? --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 16:55, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did this actually happen? 
Talk:God in a Pill?

message: I think the article misses a criticism section for completeness. Something along the lines of: 
"Some people, like Albert Hofmann and Stanislaw Grof, claim that mind-altering substances, in particular psychedelics such as LSD, psilocybin and mescaline, do not produce spritual visions and revelations themselves, but make them only accessible to the conscious mind with the human brain being their actual creator. Under this assumption they assert that they are not any less valuable for one's spiritual advancement than e.g. spontanous mystical experiences, meditation, prayer or holotropic breathwork. However, they also emphasize their dangers, if they are abused in a non-clinical/non-cultural setting."
The section should also include that the following statement made by Meher Baba is scientifically not supportable, at least not for mentally healthy individuals not possessing latent schizophrenia: 
"Baba stresses that repeated use of LSD leads to insanity which may prove incurable in mental cases, even with LSD treatment."
Moreover, one should note that there has not been put forth any scientific evidence to support the claim that LSD or psilocybin causes any physical damage to the body or brain in recreational dosages despite the numerous attempts to do so. In rare cases they can however trigger (not cause) latent psychoses and cause HPPD, PTSD and/or delusional beliefs. 139.18.149.71 (talk) 13:49, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: As Hoverfish correctly stated, the article does not give a view about drugs. Rather it gives some relevant "facts" about the subject of the article, which is a well-known 1966 pamphlet. The article contains no views about the content within the pamphlet, only the facts about those views in it. Also, to add viewpoints regarding the pamphlet, one would need to cite sources, or it would be Original Research. See, for an example of how criticism of a pamphlet is handled on Wikipedia, the article on Common Sense (pamphlet) by Thomas Paine, a very famous pamphlet. Note that the criticism is of the pamphlet, not of the idea of Independence from Britain. Also note that such criticism is citied from sources. Dazedbythebell (talk) 23:46, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: If you would like to add the views on drug-use by other writers to Wikipedia, then a good place to start might be Recreational drug use, which is on the broader subject of drugs themselves. This article would not be the appropriate place. Dazedbythebell (talk) 23:54, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism
Talk:Allan Sekula

message: With regards the notability concern - Sekula should definitely have a page on Wiki - The entry should be expanded rather than deleted. Fish Story, especially, has been discussed as one of the most important artworks of the 1990s. Ed Krcma 14:52, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I agree, he needs a page, albeit a much better one. He is definitely significant. I'll see what I can do to clean it up. --74.108.215.50 22:33, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Most of this page is taken up by a list of exhibitions. Should this be here? Totorotroll (talk) 09:58, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I was about to write the same thing. It seems like a postmortem CV rather than an assessment of Sekula's workActio (talk) 02:50, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the list does establish notability.  I've added wikilinks to many museums where the exhibitions took place.  Oddly some significant European art museums don't have Wikipedia articles yet. --doncram 19:09, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of exhibitions 
Talk:Saptakoshi River

message: This article is ignorant of the fact that "Saptakoshi" literally means "Seven Koshis", i.e. the traditional counting of seven large upper tributaries.  Instead it implies that this is one river.  Nevertheless the material on fishing is probably new.
There already is a substantial Koshi River article in addition to a Sapt Koshi stub.  I propose a merger of the new material into the Koshi River article, with redirects of Saptakoshi River and Sapt Koshi. LADave (talk) 14:53, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Both Sapt Koshi and Saptakoshi River should be made redirect pages to Koshi River. There is nothing to add from unreferenced pages, except probably a line on fishing. - Chandan Guha (talk) 23:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:List of films set in ancient Rome

message: This is a new list created on 24 August 2007 after I edited the Fiction set in ancient Rome list and added a new movie Jupiter's Darling.  It seems to me that such a list would help those looking for films partly or wholly set in the city of Rome during the Roman republic or empire.  (I was one such person looking for a list or category).  
If you have questions or comments, please address them here or on my talk page.  If you have other films to add to the list, please help out!
Sincerely wikibiohistory 14:53, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm moving these films to the Roman Republic. The Republic didn't become an Empire until Octavian became Imperator Caesar. Cleopatra died 3 years before the Republic became an Empire. Also, I'm not quite sure if the Cleopatra films should even be included. Sure her life involved dealing with Romans, but Egypt didn't become a part of Rome until after she died (her being the last Queen of Egypt of course). Which brings up the question if this article should only include films set IN Rome or include films involving Romans? If that's the case, than the articles name should be changed to something more appropriate. Opinions?JanderVK (talk) 08:13, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Julius Caesar and Cleopatra

message: The Eagle set in ancient Britain, as is Centurion and King Arthur. Agora is set in ancient Alexandria. Very little (if any at all) of Starz' Spartacus series is set in Rome, instead having Capua as its primary urban setting. Chances are any number of these movies that I haven't yet seen aren't actually set in ancient Rome, but in other places in or around the empire. Perhaps a better title, such as List of films set during the Roman Empire, is in order for this page? Spartan198 (talk) 21:29, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Many of these productions aren't even films, such as the aforementioned "Spartacus" series.  Ancient Rome in film and television perhaps? 24.149.37.233 (talk) 03:35, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name 

message: The 2 films named "Kampf um Rom" are set after the fall of Western Roman Empire, when East Emperor Justinian tries to reconquer Italy. I suggest the creation of a new "Bizantyum" category for tose two films
Rober2D2 (talk) 22:17, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post Empire Films (Bizantyum)
Talk:Westside School, Gibraltar

message: Added a list of the subjects offered at the school just like the one in the Bayside article. Gibmetal 77talk 09:11, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subjects offered 
Talk:AON Hanoi Landmark Tower

message: Per CTBUH
https://www.skyscrapercenter.com/building/keangnam-hanoi-landmark-tower/364
if the occupied height is 309.9 meters, which extends above the height of the top floor, then wikis stating a top floor height of 336 meters are incorrect.  However, we cannot simply edit the wiki with a correct top floor height fact sourced from the publicly visible database at CTBUH Skyscrapercenter.com because the top floor height is not listed publicly there. Pecan mom (talk) 21:11, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect roof height
Talk:Paul Bailey

message: There is still another one which may be relevant:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3260476/Horrifying-footage-shows-moment-British-millionaire-loses-control-750-000-Porsche-skidding-crowd-emerging-car-covered-blood-Maltese-charity-event.html
as he led a communication company (and now is known worldwide since this crash).--Mideal (talk) 11:07, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Pamela Bach

message: According to the official Bravo Otto site (http://www.bravo.de/online/render.php?render=026213) Pamela Bach is no Otto Winner. The german Wikipedia entry about the Otto Bravo does not mention her either (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bravo_Otto) 92.193.39.64 (talk) 14:36, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Otto Award
Talk:Jimri

message: Both of my sources state that Cimri means “the Leper.” While not denying that cimri in contemporary Turkish means “miser,” it is possible that the word has undergone considerable semantic change since the 13th century. One unpleasant quality over time has come to signify another. I would like to keep the translation "leper." Aramgar 17:29, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The meaning of ''cimri''
Talk:Afrika Korps (game)

message: and I don't have alot of free time to discuss this matter in depth, though I don't believe there are any violations, though a thorough explanation for why the .jpg is fair trade or use hasn't been given. And I don't know enough about the matter to say more.
That .jpg of the Avalon Hill Afrika Korps game board ..., wow, ... memories.
----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mergatroidal (talk • contribs) 21:45, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm just passing through ...
Talk:Saint-Thibéry

message: Note: If someone fills this page in the so-called Roman Bridge (Via Domitia) across L'Herault isn't in fact Roman but was rebuilt in the Middle Ages - as it fell down after a storm (according to the local tourist office). Martin Packer 16:30, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mary Pat Gleason

message: Reflink found which appears to support Burbank, California (Providence Saint Joseph's [Providence Saint Joseph Medical Center in Burbank]) as place of death, to wit:https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/04/entertainment/mary-pat-gleason-died/index.html Any opinions? 2604:2000:EFC0:12:7922:1B66:98F2:E6E1 (talk) 20:53, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Place of death
Template talk:World Trade Center sidebar

message: I've changed the title of "Tower 5" to "130 Liberty Street (Tower 5)", even though World Trade Center Tower 5 is the official article name. I don't see why it shouldn't have its future address and likely future official name listed here per the other WTC buildings, where there is absolutely no chance of confusion with the Deutsche Bank Building since (Tower 5) is specified. Rai-me 16:37, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 130 Liberty Street

message: There is no new world trade center.  There's only a planned new world trade center, and in architecture that's a big difference.  I'm correcting the template. Superm401 - Talk 13:17, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New? 

message: I don't think the listing of heights is necessary. It is making the template very wide. Heights are listed on the individual building articles, but they don't really need to be listed in the template. Rai-me 13:24, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am going to be bold and remove them, as no seems to have any opposition towards it. Heights are informative content that are really not needed in a navigation template. Cheers, Rai-me 02:58, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Heights? 

message: 7 World Trade Centre's line is the light blue color, it should be white. I can't fix it due to protection. Just to let you know. :) vıdıoman (talk • contribs) 00:26, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slight error in colors 

message: This is a layout table not a data table, so it should have no header elements. This change is under the hood. —surueña 09:16, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done —surueña 21:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accessibility problem 

message: * The relocation of The Drawing Center to the WTC was withdrawn in 2005.
* The proposed International Freedom Center was canceled in 2005.
* The official name for the memorial is the World Trade Center Memorial.  The name Reflecting Absence refers to the winning submission to a design competition held in 2003. patsw (talk) 01:43, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated to July 2008 

message: I propose reframing this template from the rebuilding of the WTC to the WTC itself, past and present. There is a need for such a template, as evidenced by the fact that the current one is used simply on any NYC WTC article. Also, the lead article on "rebuilding" does not actually exist. It redirects to the Ground Zero article. Ergo Sum  15:46, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Ergo Sum  21:58, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refocus template
Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Frater FiatLux

message: :I'm the blocking admin. It would have been nice if I had been informed about this request, as apparently my neutrality is being questioned. At any rate, I think this request is unecessary, as I blocked Kephera975 based on an evaluation of the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Kephera975. Which account is the master and which the puppet is also irrelevant, as both were operated concurrently over a long period. --Akhilleus (talk) 03:51, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also object to the characterization of my actions in this dispute. I filed the sockpuppet report solely because there was strong evidence of sockpuppetry. Like most regular editors, I encounter content disputes regularly. It takes a lot more than a content dispute for me to suspect sockpuppetry. It requires 1) several brand new users coming into the dispute and doing no other editing 2) a pattern of evidence strong enough for me to believe there may be sockpuppetry. Sometimes the reviewing admin doesn't agree, and I am learning as I go how strong the evidence should be. You will also note that I filed the previous request for checkuser to try to clarify the matter without filing a further SSP report, but it was declined. I believe I have strictly followed process in this matter and accucations of retaliation are misplaced. IPSOS (talk) 12:47, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Apollo High School (Minnesota)

message: Perhaps we should put in some more about Apollo. For example, our extracurricular groups of note. Our Mock Trial Team went to stte this last year, and our Speech Team is very good. We have chapters of SADD, CARE, TARGET, and the GSA, as well as NHS. Our theatre recently became one of the first high schools in the nation to perform 'Cats'. Or the academics could be mentioned, somewhat.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by EmDoy (talk • contribs) 14:23, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Tattoo (Jordin Sparks song)

message: Anyone care to explain how this is a country song? SpigotMap 21:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country song? 

message: Based on the audience data given in the article, "American Idol", the audience data that used to be there, and promptly deleted, is utterly wrong.  If not, will someone please verify this?  If not, it should stay deleted. 70.101.160.105 (talk) 21:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mediabase audience data

message: Please note that the iTunes chart is not the official UK Singles Chart.84.92.246.225 (talk) 19:35, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: UK Charts

message: An on-going sock puppet case involves the continual addition of unsourced sales figures. (Often, the number is changed while the source for an old figure is left in place.) Any unsourced sales numbers and/or certifications will be reverted on sight. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 20:56, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced sales figures
Talk:Kokoity Fandarast

message: Tamarasheni, Eredvi and Liakhvi is not all across SO. All of them are in Georgia-controlled part of it. Alæxis¿question? 06:35, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  All across 

message: This is encyclopedic article and the attempt to delete this article is POV pushing by politicized users of this web site like Proco. I suggest to stop vandalizing this article. I have reviewed the sources and they are all valid from UNAMIG, etc. You have no right to delete any information of encyclopedic character which has been supported by sources. Also review latest news. I have included more reference and NPOVing some sentences. MIGAbkhazeti 18:04, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Politicized POV pusher Proco still vandalizes this article with deletion tagging. Even after i made NPOVing and added more sources. This user should be warned against vandalism and POV pushing. Somebody also should protect this page.  MIGAbkhazeti 16:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Deletion tag means only that the article had been nominated for deletion (rather obviously). It shouldn't be removed until the discussion over the deletion is finished. This article is unlikely to be deleted so please refrain from indiscriminate personal attacks against fellow users. Alæxis¿question? 16:55, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Encyclopedic article and vandalism