Talk:Cucurbitaceae

message: For example, the number of species is given inconsistently in different paragraphs!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.21.145.28 (talk) 08:39, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: A generic name can be used more than once in taxonomy, provided that it has not been used before in that particular kingdom, like, example, Proteus the salamander versus the genus of bacterium.--Mr Fink (talk) 03:20, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs rigorous editing 

message: I add the ref Ghebretinsae et al. because I consider an important source based on both nuclear and chloroplast genome, but I disagree partially with their conclusions that the genera Myrmecosycios, Oreosyce and Cucumella should be regarded synonyms of Cucumis, since that there was weak bootstrap support and polytomy (anagenesis) for this. Berton 19:10, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ''[[Cucumis]]'' and related genera

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Cucurbitaceae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101213041459/http://delta-intkey.com/angio/ to http://delta-intkey.com/angio/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070103200438/http://delta-intkey.com:80/ to http://delta-intkey.com
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:16, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Cucurbitaceae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111028061200/http://www.cucurbit.org/family.html to http://www.cucurbit.org/family.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111028061200/http://www.cucurbit.org/family.html to http://www.cucurbit.org/family.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://delta-intkey.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:02, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article could mention how members of this family are typically known as squashes, and distinguish summer squashes (such as cucumber or courgettes) from winter squashes (such as pumpkin or butternut squash). Vorbee (talk) 16:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not all members of this family are "typically known as squashes"; some are cucumbers, bitter melons, etc. (I would never myself call a cucumber a "summer squash"). Squashes are dealt with at Squash (plant). Peter coxhead (talk) 16:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: A) Cucumbers are not officially considered summer squash, and B) plenty of well-known curcubits are never referred to as "squash," like gourds, and watermelon, for example.--Mr Fink (talk) 16:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Squashes

message: So there is a Sechium article, and the article on the chayote uses that generic name. On the other hand, Sechium doesn't show in the list here, and there is an HTML comment saying it's a synonym of Sicyos. One, why are we hiding important information in HTML comments? Two, which article(s) should be corrected, this one or the chayote and Sechium articles?
IAmNitpicking (talk) 11:21, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The title of the article at Sechium is based on the now obsolete database The Plant List. The more up to date Plants of the World Online uses Sicyos, and the article should be moved to this name. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:24, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Should this article maybe mention Sechium as an obsolete synonym? Real question, not rhetorical: what is the Wikipedia standard for taxonomic changes? I don't know.IAmNitpicking (talk) 19:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: If you look at organism articles, synonyms are listed in the taxobox. If a plant has been well known by a different name, then I would certainly expect this to be in the text of the article, even in the opening sentence. Peter coxhead (talk) 21:38, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency in Wikipedia taxonomy: Genus Sechium.?