Talk:Monolingualism

message: Doesn't γλοσσα/γλωσσα(sp?) mean tongue? The artice Glottis says a glottis is the space between the vocal cords. My high school Greek is rusty but why glotta?
I would like to know to what extent one can call another a monoglot. I'm fluent in only one language, but I consider myself able to speak French and Spanish to a quite advanced standard. Does monoglottism cover those who only speak one language without speaking any others at all, and/or those who are fluent in only one but are near-fluent in others? 81.77.111.231 23:39, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see why this term is so difficult. If you're raised in a country where everyone you ever meet speaks only your native language, and you read no foreign books, films etc, and visit no foreign countries, then you're a monoglot. You may be aware of other languages, and you may even know how to say Qui in French, but you can only communicate in a single language. The fact your brain hasn't been exposed to thought patterns in any other language than your first is probably why that study reached its conclusion (but what do I know?) 85.227.226.168 14:00, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The belief about English having "the most words" isn't true in any meaningful sense; see http://www.economist.com/blogs/johnson/2010/06/counting_words, for example.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.107.33.85 (talk) 20:53, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

text: Accent is largely irrelevant to fluency. The two aspects haven't much to do with each other. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 20:20, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: "and are perhaps more likely to believe their native language is culturally and economically influential than those who understand or speak more than one language[citation needed]."
I propose this part is removed. This reads like a simple rumour and has no place on Wikipedia unless verified, and even then the "perhaps" must go. 85.227.226.168 13:55, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  perhaps what? 

message: The section of Belgium seems a bit biased in that it only seems to take in account the "immigrant language" of Turkish, disregarding the high-prestige native language of French, and other high-prestige European languages, such as English and German. The viewpoint of Turkish would likely still be prejudiced, but it isn't really per se a sign of promoted monolingualism. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 20:26, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Belgium 

message: This whole article appears to violate NPOV because it is one large slam against monolinguism and people who cannot learn a second language (something that appears to be omitted from the discussion), and it's all in favor of bilingualism. What happened to neutral point of view? 68.146.52.234 (talk) 00:00, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV violation

message: I'm not very experienced with citations and sources on Wikipedia, so I'm not editing this, but the section "Verbal and non-verbal cognitive development" cites what appears to be a Chinese news site as a source on what I'm fairly certain is this 2012 study ("Bilingual Effects on Cognitive and Linguistic Development: Role of Language, Cultural Background, and Education").  The Chinese news article doesn't provide a link to the study, and I thought it bizarre a non-English source was used in the first place.  Like I said, I have no experience, so I'm putting this info here in case someone else would like to edit this.  Or if I one day learn how to Wikipedia and do it myself.  No one looks at talk pages anyways so the latter is entirely possible. Cheers.  --2602:306:C5A6:1480:9DC8:E3BB:C58E:4384 (talk) 09:19, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird source used 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Monolingualism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120822104004/http://www.cal.org/resources/Digest/digestglobal.html to http://www.cal.org/resources/Digest/digestglobal.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:26, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018)