lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Do-Ashkaft Cave

message: Just I am curios,does the name Do-Ashkaft Cave mean a cave with two floors or ... :)? Gülməmməd Talk 18:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name 
Talk:Stone Tape Theory

message: This page contains no real information; is there anything more to this, can more sources be given, can WHO makes these claims be cited, and should this even be a seperate page from whatever article talks about proposed explanations for ghost sitings, if such a page exists? Titanium Dragon 10:18, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrible 

message: Stone tape theory
Since the discovery of the stone tape theory it’s been a big notion explaining ghosts. Researchers suggest that the recordings get stored during a period of high stress. The energy can be stored for any amount of time. It’s unknown how long but can be triggered by an individual with the right aspects. These aspects include stress level, brainwaves, etc. The replay of sound can be the entire event or just certain aspects.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymous777985 (talk • contribs) 09:44, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this be added?
Talk:Eliphaz (Job)

message: There's a template on this page from a year ago that says this page doesn't cite any sources. Technically, that's no longer true now that I've added a reference to scholarly work on the etymology for Eliphaz's name. In reality, though, the article still needs plenty of work. Alephb (talk) 11:50, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I've updated the template. Ibadibam (talk) 18:08, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template now outdate
Talk:Kaduna State

message: Someone added an entry in Marsa, please feel free to expand it.--「ѕʀʟ·✎」 17:37, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marsa 
Talk:Craugastor omoaensis

message: Have added more information about the uniqueness of the creature and an article of its IUCN red-list status. However can find no digital image of this very rare species - does any exist? Before creating more subsections, i believe a image is needed  OannesMission (talk) 20:53, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Carmunnock

message: Both of these links provide good info on history of the town. Think a lot more needs to be included in the article.
* http://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=2807&p=0 - Carmunnock Conservation Village Leaflet
* http://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=3978&p=0 - 'CARMUNNOCK CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL'  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arossmorrison (talk • contribs) 13:47, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need More on History
Talk:Ross Prio

message: ross prio is my great grandpa if any1 has any pictures it would mean alot of me to see them
Ross Prio was my godfather. Tom & Josie Merlo were friends of the Prios and they would often come to visit.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pbohlen (talk • contribs) 17:01, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Zechariah ben Jehoiada

message: Hi,
After trying to edit other Wikipedia articles unsuccessfully, I am a bit gun-shy to try again.  So, would someone who is the moderator of this article please see II Chronicles 24:1 and II Chronicles 24:20-22 (whole chapter can be found here:  https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Chronicles+24&version=KJV ) to see that Zechariah ben Jehoiada lived during the reign of King Joash, whom  William F. Albright has dated  to 837–800 BC, while E. R. Thiele offers the dates 835–796 BC.[3]  See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jehoash_of_Judah.
This is about 200 years prior to Nebuchadnezzar's seige of Jerusalem, during the reign of King Zedekiah, dated to 587 BC.  See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Jerusalem_(587_BC) 
If someone would please change the wording to reflect these facts, I would really appreciate it.  
I would do it myself, but after having quotes from the Bible be rejected and told it was not verifiable for me to make the changes from quoting direct sources (I did not quote another scholar saying the same thing I was saying), I am not quite sure how to make changes to articles that have wrong information in them, according to primary sources.  
Thanks so much,
Shelley Houser,
Username chemistmom Chemistmom (talk) 16:26, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zechariah ben Jehoiada lived during the reign of King Joash, not Nebuchadnezzar
Talk:Eliezer

message: This article breaks standard article structure guidelines.  It starts off as an article on a few historical figures, then suddenly turns into a disambiguation page.  It shouldn't try to be both. Zerotalk 04:45, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, I wasn't sure how to do it. I just moved most of the content to Eliezer (disambiguation). Yoninah (talk) 12:52, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nature of this page 

message: Is it me, or could this edit do with expanding a bit to explain more?  "Help" and "Court" seem like very different ideas.  Is the article presenting two basically different translations / interpretations of the name?  – SquisherDa (talk) 21:53, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:   "Help/Court of El"?
Talk:Micaiah

message: Who asked who about help with taking back Ramoth-gilead? Ref. 1 Kings 22 vs 4 And he (the King of Israel) said to Jehoshaphat, 'Will you go with me to battle at Ramoth-gilead?' New American Standard Bible 1995 
Surveillant Spotter (talk) 15:03, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy 

message: I can put in some examples if necessary of an entire line of English Sea Captains and Magistrates in the C18 and C19 of the name "Micaiah Malbon". Is it a current trend to have the name as female only, and is that what is being referred to? Reynardo (talk) 16:55, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unisex 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:05, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Segregation in Northern Ireland

message: Have a look at my sandbox; I think they fit quite seamlessly into each other. Feel free to mess around! --Victor falk 20:25, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: mergefrom|Religious discrimination in Northern Ireland

message: This is a useful article. Glad to see the issues over the naming of the article didn't prevent that.
I think the article Peace lines could do with expansion and some referencing and background information copied from this article (indeed this should be the "parent" article for the article "Peace lines").
zoney  ♣ talk 10:25, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useful article 
Talk:Mary Johnston (novelist)

message: I was searching for more information or photos of Mary Johnston (novelist), when I came across this page 
    http://www.littlecolonel.com/MaryG.htm).
Painter and writer Mary G. Johnston lived until 1966.  The Mary G. Johnston page has that same photograph, plus others of her at various ages.  I later searched for Kate Matthews, who is named as the photographer for that image on the MaryG page, and found that same image, plus references to her work for the mother of Mary G Johnston.
Amazon.com has a book listing for the Mary Johnston (1870-1936) novel "Hagar," published by the University of Virginia Press (April 1994) which has this cover photo (the image is copyrighted):
    http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0813915260.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
123dd 09:59, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The photograph may be of a different Mary Johnston
Talk:Rail services in the West of England

message: Ths article is still being created, and will um up all rail services within bristol. mark999
::Could do with better attention to layout and a good lead. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:43, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article

message: Sorry for those edits - got mixed up with pages! Welshleprechaun (talk) 19:30, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: December 2009

message: Following the discussion at AfD, see banner at top of this page, I have merged in the contents on that article.  At least on section of this is now fully referenced! Jezhotwells (talk) 09:30, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Greater Bristol Metro scheme
Talk:Iddo (prophet)

message: Is this Iddo the same as the grandfather of Zechariah? I don't think so as the latter returned to Jerusalem when Cyrus released the Jews. Yes? If so, it should be mentioned here that there were two.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thmazing (talk • contribs) 18:58, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Encyclopaedia Biblica, those are two different Iddo's so because this article is about Iddo the prophet, Zechariah's grandpop doesn't need addressed, unless someone finds a reliable source that says they're the same character.Alephb (talk) 00:51, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Crossodactylus aeneus

message: I was writing the SEWP article on this species, and I noticed that ASW lists C. aeneus as a synonym for C. gaudichaudii.  Sometimes herpetologists do that. Sometimes they do that and then later change their minds, deciding that yes they were two separate species after all. Do we have anything definitive on this? Darkfrog24 (talk) 13:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Synonym?
Talk:List of United Kingdom locations/botreq

message: For each of the pages in List of United Kingdom locations, replace:

[[Image:Uk-map.svg|right|thumb|300px|The United Kingdom]]
This is part of [[List of United Kingdom locations]]: a [[gazetteer]] of place names in the [[United Kingdom]] showing each place's [[county]] and geographical coordinates.

or:

[[Image:Uk-map.svg|right|thumb|300px|The United Kingdom]]
This is part of [[List of United Kingdom locations]]: a [[gazetteer]] of place names in the [[United Kingdom]] showing each place's [[Local government in the United Kingdom|local authority]] and geographical coordinates.

with 
 — Madman bum and angel (talk – desk) 22:35, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Step One

message: On each of the listing pages, replace:

{| class="wikitable"
| style="width:240px" | Town
| style="width:120px" | Local authority
| style="width:130px" | Co-ordinates
| [[Ordnance Survey|OS]] [[British_national_grid_reference_system|grid reference]]

with 
 — Madman bum and angel (talk – desk) 15:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you again. I've subsequently sub-divided a few pages, so you may need to re-check your lists before starting phase 3. Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 15:56, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Noted.  — Madman bum and angel (talk – desk) 19:05, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Step Two

message: Any comments or issues? Should we remove the link from the OS Grid Ref, as coordinates are more precise? Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 19:03, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would retain the link from the OS Co-ord as it is the the I always use at it is usually correct where the other entry may be incorrect as it is more difficult for people to get right. Keith D 20:07, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:NASA Astronaut Group 3

message: I added... Seven were Air Force, four were Navy, and three others. 2601:589:4801:5660:8CED:58:5795:D261 (talk) 11:35, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  NASA Astronaut Group 3 - 'The Fourteen' - 7 were Air Force, 4 were Navy, and three others
Talk:Pricking

message: In the second section of this article, it refers to tools being used that could release blood to ensure guilt.  This does not appear to make sense, because the accused would only be named a witch if the area of skin did not bleed.  If the tool released blood, this would seem to prove the accused not guilty, and the 'expert' would not be paid for a successful find.  Am I reading this wrong, or can someone who understands this concept modify the article to make it more clear? *Vendetta* (whois talk edits) 19:04, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with both of you; the wording in this piece is entirely ambiguous. Unfortunately, I have no idea which way would be considered correct. :| 12.19.84.33 (talk) 15:36, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just wondering about that as well. It doesn't make sense at all, and yet another such mention is made in section two; it says that some pins contained blood that could be released on demand, adding further evidence. It doesn't add up to the first few sentences in the article. And besides, from what I've always read, it was a lack of pain and blood that condemned witches. I agree with Jisjustme concerning the re-wording of the sentence. 24.36.150.124 (talk) 21:34, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Unclear?
Talk:WMVQ

message: I understand the switch from WMVQ to WSPJ-LP but will readers? I'd suggest either re-naming the article - which I don't know how to do - or closing out this one's history and starting a new article under WSPJ-LP. Allreet (talk) 20:31, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  WMVQ vs WSPJ: confusing call letters
Talk:Anscombe transform

message: I created this page since I believe this subject is missing to Wikipedia. This transformation is part of the common knowledge of people who do image processing in X-ray and Astronomy. Doing some researches on it for the purpose of this article I discovered that it is also used by statisticians before regression or Anova on poissonian data. I'll add a section about that while developping this article.
--Bixbis 19:08, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As it stands now, the article makes no attempt at all to say what the Anscombe transform is.  That should appear prominently. Michael Hardy 15:18, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Edalorhina perezi

message: — Assignment last updated by CalJS (talk) 23:19, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Behavioral Ecology 2022

message: A lot of really yummy info added to the entry! The mating and parental care sections were really well written; they had great flow. The section on description I understand its a tedium to digest for the reader and much easier to leave it as is w/ the anatomical terminology but jargon makes it impossible to read for the average reader. I made some minor grammar and wording edits in the rest of the entry. Overall solid job :) 
Lead
Changed passive to active voice
Removed, “However, this was assessed in 2004, so an update is needed.” Appears to be an opinion?
Description
“The body is a concave shape” this is unclear
Removed comma splices
General grammar edits
Removed colorful words like decorated and assumptive words like random
Explain instead of using jargon e.g. dextral vent tube, terminal oral discs, filiform median ridge, etc. 
Geographical Variation
I feel like this section was paraphrased instead of summarized, there is too much jargon
Habitat and Distribution, Diet, and Mating
These sections are well written, concise, and easy to read/understand. The Mating section is really well done.
Reproduction and Life Cycle
“the tadpoles grow to a total length of 10.5 mm.” removed because it appears to be discontinued Elwhoelwu (talk) 00:49, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entry Peer Review 

message: This was a really strong, well-researched, and clear article. Well done! I had a few minor edits that were mostly for formatting or grammar/clarity.
I italicized several species names that were not previously italicized, changed the section heading “population phylogeny…” to "Taxonomy" and moved it higher up on the page. I also changed the order of some sentences to “lead” with the more important fact or subject of the sentence, or reduce the flowery-ness to just focus on the the fact. I also added a ew hyperlinks to other wikipedia entries. I also took out the word "interesting" to reduce opinions (even though I agree that the fact in question was really cool).
I had a few comments as well- see below. 
What is Pleistocene? More information on what this is would be helpful for readers!
I think that an image would have helped break up the text in the article as well, and made it more visually engaging. 
 Gracedekoker (talk) 15:32, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review comments and changes
Talk:Pristimantis actinolaimus

message: :@Quadell, BDD: Cleaning up after these moves is is a much, much more laborious process than just doing the moves, which was negligible by comparison. First, identifying what would need to be done is key I suppose. So we need to replace the old title with the new in the lead and in the infobox and the the defaultsort. Then, what about the genus, species and binomial names? And if we are changing that, then the binomial_authority would have to change as well, yes? All that prior information was cited to the IUCN red list, but would it still be verified by that citation or should that change as well? I couldn't begin to tackle this without input from people in the know as to proper scope and methodology for the cleanup (and I think this is really a bot task, if possible). Can polbot clean up after these moves if we identify what needs to be done? (Should this thread be somewhere else where more subject matter experts will see it?)--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:45, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, I'm not able to run bots anymore, so Polbot can't be of assistance here. (I wish she could!) You could ask at Wikipedia:Bot requests, although I'm sure they'd want to be sure the changes made are in line with both policy and the sources.  – Quadell (talk) 14:52, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaning up after the move
Talk:Mensa

message: Based on my girlfriend's description of what "mensa" means, I think a reasonable English rendering is "gullible" (but that's rather close to "stupid" in meaning, so I'll keep the other word).  Since Wikipedia is getting to be more careful about sources, I'll comment on using this as information to put in the Wiki. Using the intuitions of a native speaker of a language is a reliable source for information about said language; it's a primary source, so should be treated with care. Samboy (talk) 17:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mensa in Mexican Spanish
Talk:Air Anglia

message: I do seem to recall that, when working at Aberdeen Airport in 1976/77, a Fokker Friendship from Air Anglia suffered a partial undercarriage failure whilst parked on the apron in front of the old airport terminal. Rumour at the time was that a ground engineer accidentally retracted one of the main undercarriage legs whilst performing ground checks.  Whatever the reason, the aircraft dropped on one side and the wing hit the floor, apparently knocking it slightly out of true.
The aircraft was righted pretty quickly but it sat on the apron for some time until a volunteer crew flew it back to Air Anglia's repair base at Norwich Airport.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.210.36.140 (talk) 14:48, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting but it would not be notable enough for inclusion. MilborneOne (talk) 20:14, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incidents and accidents
Talk:Merry Men

message: I believe that there might have been some vandalism with respect to Will Stutley.  No source is cited and it certainly doesn't marry with the reference at the bottom of the page.  Maybe I'm wrong?219.114.103.192 (talk) 06:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Will Stutely 

message: You may want to put a lock on this article for a little while. I have sent the following email to Radcliffe and Maconie (I am a fan of the show and they know me as a regular correspondent):
Hi Mark and Stuart,
Can you please not ask people to vandalise Wikipedia in future? There are a lot of people who work hard as volunteers maintaining the integrity of the site, and they could do without stuff like this.
Thanks
Martyn Smith from Croydon
Martyn Smith (talk) 14:17, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lock? 

message: I've added a "not in citation given" to the claim about merry's "archaic meaning".  The link simply says that "merry man" has been used to describe an outlaw's companions since the late 14th Century.  It doesn't tell us anything about the meaning of the word "merry" by itself, or suggest that it meant anything different in the past.  As the lead currently stands, it's like trying to claim that the word "jolly" meant "pirate-related" in the early modern era, based on its use in the phrase "jolly roger".
It may simply be that bands of outlaws were traditionally portrayed as being care-free and jovial in the Middle Ages, leading to the popular phrase "merry men".  In either case, the citation given doesn't teach us anything about the history of the word merry or its "archaic meaning", but the lead makes it sound like it does.Señor Service (talk) 19:57, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Archaic sense of the word "merry"

message: blablabla  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.96.97.172 (talk) 07:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  bla
Talk:Ústí nad Orlicí District

message: At the beginning of 2007 three villages were removed from Ústí nad Orlicí District to Svitavy District. These villages are:
* Sloupnice
* Vlčkov
* Němčice
That's way recategorization, I have made, was needed.
Some other villages from Pardubice District and Chrudim District were shifted to Ústí nad Orlicí District. Other Wikipedia users are requested to correct the list of towns and villages in the article.
Nautil2 19:18, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Fortified Hill Works

message: Hey Nyttend, here ya go  File:Fortified Hill Works Squier and Davis Plate VI.jpg , wasn't sure if you have checked my talk lately. Wasn't sure where to add it on here, since its so stubbed right now, thought I would leave it up to you. One thought tho, on the page where you have its uses as "fortification", I doubt that that's the current theory on its purpose. From what I've read all of the "fortified works" were ceremonial sites that wouldn't have actually functioned well as forts. It may say so at NPS.gov, but I'm sure thats probably a remnant from a hundred years ago, LOL. Heironymous Rowe (talk) 16:15, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Squier and Davis