lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Starburst galaxy

message: "Starbucks coffee galaxy"? sk4p (talk) 21:51, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. This was on my watchlist too - sorry for missing it... --Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 23:26, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Starbucks?

message: Shows "Wolf-Rayet galaxies" as hyperlink to "Wolf-Rayet galaxy" which redirects back to this page.  IMO not useful.  Can someone educate me about the self linking policy if any? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ConradPino (talk • contribs) 23:47, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Resolved April 27, 2007 19:49 by User:Platyfish625. Conrad T. Pino 07:27, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Types of starburst

message: The caption "located 12.2. billion light years away, currently creating 4000 stars per year" seems a little off.  I know, I know, relativistic dogma says that this is right now in some frame of reference.  Still, when you strike an average of all the mass out to 12 billion light years, we know we're pretty near to at rest in some absolute frame of reference, with nearly all the velocity we see accounted for by Hubble expansion away from us in all directions.  So in some practical sense it is fair to say that the light is from 12.2 billion years ago, the distance as we see it.  And if you want to go by strict relativity... then what does "currently" mean?  This is something that probably could use a style guideline (hmmm, maybe it has one somewhere...) but for now an ad hoc fix seems appropriate. Wnt (talk) 06:58, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Currently"... 

message: I have added a link in the "See also" section to the "Pea galaxy" article as I'm sure that it is relevant to this subject. Richard Nowell (talk) 11:16, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pea galaxies

message: They shouldn't have changed the name ;-) M0ffx (talk) 07:44, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opal Fruits galaxy 

message: Newly burst (I couldn't resist) upon the scene.  Jim.henderson (talk) 20:16, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  COSMOS-AzTEC-1
Talk:Theudas

message: The problem with expansion on this particular article is that there are, literally, two sources for any information on the fellow whatever.  One is Josephus, who mentions him briefly, and the other is the Book of Acts, which mentions him briefly.  In other words, I think a little is all anyone knows, and therefore I'm not sure that the expansion tag is really going to be helpful here.  I would love to be proven wrong, though. Geogre 20:29, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's discussed quite a bit in some reliable sources. Eg   (p.162),  . I should also point out the the mention of the census in the article is a bit problematic as which census it was isn't that clearcut. Dougweller (talk) 06:05, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed it is not clearcut, but Acts is addressed presumably to the same Theophilus as Luke's gospel, which had a parenthetical comment about the "taxing" (census) in the days of Cyrenius. The speaker in Acts 5 however is Gamaliel. The fact that Luke does not qualify or comment on Gamaliel's words seems to indicate he was referring to something well known to those present. Have any archeologists discovered the secret cave with the answers to all our questions yet? Oh well.Thanks for those 4 links. —Telpardec (talk) 02:25, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded?  If wishes were fishes...
Talk:Parlour game

message: In this edit, User:Connel MacKenzie linked "Guess who" to the disambiguation page Guess Who, asking if perhaps that wasn't more of a board game than a parlour game.  I suspect the original intention was not to reference the Milton Bradley board game "Guess Who?", but rather an unidentified non-board-game of less recent vintage which probably goes by multiple names in addition to "Guess Who".  However, I don't know for sure.  Powers T 14:04, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Guess Who

message: Are the called parlour games because they were played in the parlour, or are they called parlour games because they involve words and talking ('parler')? 88.97.18.12 (talk) 14:59, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of name

message: Why does Carol Burnett's character call "Sorry" a "parlour game"?
Drsruli (talk) 06:19, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sorry"
Talk:Valentinus (Gnostic)

message: Quote: "According to Tertullian, Valentinus was a candidate for bishop but started his own group when another was chosen."
This is of course a POLITICAL statement made by Tertullian. Valentinus never "started his own group", but until his death considered himself a member of the universal church. Tertullian (et al.) were actually more concerned with the Valentinians than they were with him, and rather than theological, their differences pertained to the institutionalization of the church.--Sparviere (talk) 16:27, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Revived discussion

message: sv:Valentinus (gnostiker)?--NERIUM 20:39, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted link 

message: Does anyone know if the Ptolemy who was the student of Valentinus is the famous Ptolemy of Alexandria linked here?  I couldn't find any evidence either way, but I didn't look hard. --Bmorton3 19:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know either, but look at the dates - Valentinus was only about a decade or so after Ptolemy, so I'd tend to doubt it. --maru   (talk)  contribs 23:29, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No he wasn't. --Wetman 10:04, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ptolemy

message: ::Why not mention that Tertullien suggested that Valentinus was a serious contender for Bishop of Rome/Pope and almost won the election, with a reference, without the slanderous part of the quote? SquirleyWurley
:::It is mentioned in proper fashion. Str1977 (smile back) 07:41, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: contender

message: the article says: "Ptolemy is known only for this letter to a wealthy Gnostic lady named Flora", but ptolemy's article says flora wasn't a gnostic, but a christian. which is right? Tjenare 21:20, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: flora

message: this page states his death date at 160ce.
G.R.S. Mead, via Hoeller,  http://www.gnosis.org/valentinus.htm  claims Tertullian placed Valentinus death much later than 160ce. by claiming that Valentinus lived after 175ce.   However, Tertullian himself was  born in 160, therefore if Tertullian was speaking first hand as a personal acquaintance it would mean that Valentinus death was later than the listed 160ce.  However, I'm not entirely sure how much of Tertullians history can be trusted as he also placed Origen and Valentinus as personal acquaintences, but by any timeline they could not have overlapped.   
Could someone please note these problems to at least educate the reader for potential errors? 
Which death date is correct? 
signed by, Zoshac  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoshac (talk • contribs) 22:52, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  which death date is correct?
Talk:Petrus Plancius

message: "...a North East passage through North America"
: I thought the Northeast Passage was through north Russia and the Northwest passage was through North America. Any clarification? Kortoso (talk) 21:23, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: True, it was also removed a while ago (21 December 2017), it has been in the article for the past five years though (summary :"Somehow no one caught this erroneous addition by User:Wetman for five years, despite him mentioning it in his edit summary. The Northeast Passage, which Barentsz did seek, did not go through North America; that's the Northwest passage."). So first Plancius wanted to find a passage crossing the North Pole/through north Russia, but this failed (ice, bad weather conditions), later he helped in finding a passage north of Canada, this also failed, but they founded New York/New Netherland instead.Dubito, ergo cogito, ergo sum (talk) 02:41, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  North East passage?
Talk:Apple Developer

message: I think I have adequately expanded the article, and so I have removed the expansion notice. TDS  (talk • contribs)  04:06, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion Notice Removed 

message: Could be "B" class, however lacks independent reviews, value for money, comparison between other developer programmes and criticism (if any). Nja247 (talk • contribs) 09:32, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: I've readded the advert tag. I think the "Benefits" section needs to be rewritten; as it stands, it seems almost verbatim from the ADC site. A criticism section would be good, too, but I'm not sure how much in the way of independent reviews is available. bou·le·var·dier (talk) 09:38, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement

message: The membership types are no longer applicable: Now there are only two options: Mc Developer or iOS Developer, each for $99 / year.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.128.31.9 (talk) 12:31, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I updated the article a lot, but it still needs a little bit more work. AriX (talk) 00:26, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Now there is only one type of membership as the iOS and Mac Developer programs were merged. Nathan Osman (talk) 06:03, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Membership types 

message: The Apple developer program is at https://developer.apple.com/, not the link to the fake site that is currently in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C2:200:2230:5978:AC3D:CBFA:C52C (talk) 23:21, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phishing attempt 

message: I have added the template because the article's tone seems quite informal compared to most articles. I will help to try to improve the tone, and will remove the template if the problem is resolved. 1980fast (talk) 06:05, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup template added
Talk:Archibald MacLeish

message: I created this from Most Wanted Pages.  The biography is solid, but I don't know literature so the discussion of his actual work is embarassingly short.  If someone with more literary knowledge could expand it, that'd be appreciated.  Isomorphic 15:39, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Also add a list of his works ··gracefool |☺ 04:42, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 14:44, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problem

message: This article could use a citation cleanup, unifying all of the citations to that one book using Shortened footnotes or WP:NAMEDREFS. 121a0012 (talk) 03:10, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 
Talk:National myth

message: The section about China, what part of Sun Yat-sen in his role for the creation of the Republic of China a myth? The wikipedia articles on gunpowder and compass clearly indicate those are Chinese inventions. Are we saying these articles present myths? --Kvasir 02:44, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Myth?? 

message: As a French person I was rather amused to see your choice of myths. This selection would still have been acceptable 50 years ago, but I think later events (the Resistance for example), loom larger in French memories. And the best remembered episode from the French Revolution is not the execution of King Louis, but the storming of the Bastille.--Anne97432 15:49, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  France 

message: The entry for Estonia lists Kalevipoeg.  I'm not sure it's entirely appropriate alone, as this does not appear to fully match the definitions specified above.  Perhaps, myths dating from the Estonian War of Independence should be added. Digwuren 00:02, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Estonia 

message: This section is about the myth of nationalism as an ideology itself, rather than national myths. How can this be clearer? Should i move it somewhere else? Drew Stanley (talk) 18:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary myths
Talk:Salavan province

message: An internet comic strip <xkcd.com> raised money to construct The Kengthan Incomplete Primary School in Laos Salavan Province on Road No. 13 South. To see pix, go to http://blog.xkcd.com/  and scroll down to 
Speaking of which, here are pictures of the xkcd school nearing completion in Laos: 
--Pawyilee (talk) 10:18, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Kengthan Incomplete Primary School

message: Do the numbers denote postcode? They seem to be out be one (ref: www.addressdoctor.com) any thoughts? 129.78.220.7 (talk) 03:37, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbers
Talk:Polarization (psychology)

message: Perhaps this article should be merged with one or both of Attitude polarization and Group polarization. What do others think?--Srleffler (talk) 05:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: While I don't object to this merge, I do have some problem with the discussion, as this appeared to have never been posted at the (former) attitude polarisation article (which I am following) so the first thing I noticed of this was the actual merger. For future cases, please make sure all relevant pages are notified (and that notification is active on all those pages at the time of merger). Thanks. Arnoutf (talk) 12:55, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

text: Hi Artnoutf, thanks for your reply. I'm fairly new to the editing world of Wikipedia, so it's entirely possible my approach didn't adhere to protocol! Thanks for letting me know, I'll be more mindful of that in future. However, I believe there was discussion of the merger on the attitude page prior to the merger, as I did check to see if this was proposed on both pages, and I tried to adhere to the Wiki page on how to complete mergers. Still, I'll keep this feedback in mind moving forward.Lmgoldst (talk) 03:28, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: :Hi all, after further consideration and after merging the attitude polarization page into the group polarization article, my conclusion is that this page should be deleted, and readers should be redirected to group polarization page. There is no unique information on this page that isn't better explained in the group polarization page; furthermore, this page has minimal basis in research. As polarization in psychology is almost exclusively discussed in the context of groups and attitudes, I'd argue this page is not helpful or unique. What do others think?Lmgoldst (talk) 03:09, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposing Deletion of Page
Talk:Sebastiane

message: "The only film made in Britain with English subtitles"...I find this highly unlikely as the must be any number of Welsh language or 'Bollywood' style films made in the UK.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.10.209.178 (talk) 19:32, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, I've seen some English films with heavy dialect (such as some of Ken Loach's stuff) and with English subtitles. I'm going to remove the assertion as unsupportable. TheEvilPanda (talk) 04:04, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Subtitles?
Talk:Treaty of Lambeth

message: On different parts of this website, it is suggested separately that a) there was one treaty, known as the treaty of Kingston or the treaty of Lambeth, and b) there were two treaties, the treaty of Kingston followed by ratification at the treaty of Lambeth. 
Which is correct? 
My own source (The Oxford History of England vol. IV, "The Thirteenth Century") makes no mention of a Treaty of Lambeth, and goes into the Treaty of Kingston in depth. The last revision of my book was in 1968 though, so I presumed that the term "the Treaty of Lambeth" had gained common currency over the Kingston nomenclature. 
However, I am uncertain. It is possible that the material I have added should be copy-pasted into a new page for the Treaty of Kingston, and the old page should be restored and edited slightly. RJ Gordon (talk) 09:46, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kingston or Lambeth?
Template talk:Jewish-hist-stub

message: Note: This stub is for subjects and articles that cover secular Jewish subjects as well as many broad subjects, topics, and articles from Jewish history of all eras. For those subjects and articles that are clearly related and connected to the Jewish religion i.e. Judaism, please use the  (:Category:Judaism stubs). For articles that deal with the Hebrew Bible or Torah or Tanakh use the  (:Category:Tanakh stubs). For the modern State of Israel-related subjects or articles, please use the  (:Category:Israel stubs). Thank you. IZAK 04:19, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose of this stub
Template talk:Israel-stub

message: Note: This stub is for subjects and articles related to the modern State of Israel. For subjects and articles about the Jewish people that are not directly related to the State of Israel, please use the  (:Category:Jewish history stubs). For subjects and articles dealing with the Jewish religion please use the  (:Category:Judaism stubs). For articles dealing with the Hebrew Bible or Torah or Tanakh please use the  (:Category:Tanakh stubs). Thank you. IZAK 04:38, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose of this stub
Template talk:Judaism-stub

message: Note: This stub is for articles that are directly connected to the Jewish religion i.e. Judaism, in some way or other, including non-Biblical Jewish religious texts. Those subjects that deal with the Hebrew Bible or Torah or Tanakh articles have their own  (:Category:Tanakh stubs). The Judaism-stub is not for secular subjects or articles which are covered by the more general  (:Category:Jewish history stubs). There is also a separate stub for the modern State of Israel-related articles  (:Category:Israel stubs). Thank you. IZAK 04:24, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose of this stub

message: * :he:Template:קצרמר יהדות
* :ja:Template:Judaism-stub
: --Sheynhertzגעשׁ״ך 22:40, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added those to the template, now that there's <noinclude> --Mairi 07:12, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related interlings 

message: Hi, I disagree with the use of a specifically blue Magen David. Although the Magen David is indeed an ancient Jewish symbol, this image, specifically in the colour blue, has come of late to be associated with zionism, which is a historically new movement that is by no means universally accepted in the Jewish world, and thus the use of this particular image is POV. I suggest that it be changed back to the neutral image on an earlier edit: a black Magen David. This image could be used, an image that is still in use for the Judaism bio template:  Thanks in advance. --Yehoishophot Oliver 14:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 14:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

text: See Blue in Judaism. There was no consensus for this change. I personally dislike black Magen David. BTW, if we are looking for an ancient symbol, a better choice would be menorah: Magen David became a Jewish symbol only in the Middle Ages. ←Humus sapiens ну? 22:58, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no objection to changing the symbol to a Menorah. Yehoishophot Oliver 00:50, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We can have both; stop making everything political. Jayjg (talk) 01:19, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  request for colour change 

message: Can you please add the interwiki to Macedonian Wiki mk:Шаблон:Јудаизам-никулец. Thanks a lot --B. Jankuloski (talk) 09:53, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:37, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mk interwiki 

message: Please add the :ro:Format:Ciot-iudaism interwiki. Also the above request for :mk. thanks Ark25 (talk) 09:05, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:37, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ro interwiki 

message: Hello, could you please add el:Πρότυπο:Ιουδαϊσμός-επέκταση, the link towards the greek Wikipedia? Thank you in advance. Atlantia (talk) 14:26, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  El interwiki 

message: ar:قالب:بذرة يهودية. Thks. --Helmoony (talk) 14:38, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ar Interwiki
Talk:Joe Johnson (basketball)/to do

message: * Article contains small-ish POV problems.
* Writing not encyclopaedic.
* Needs wikification.
* Needs Picture.
* 2nd paragraph under College career makes no sense referring him as Johns and U of L at H is not descriptive enough.  Possible vandalism.
: Above 3 added by Animated Cascade «talk» 07:38, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: To do
Talk:Decimal hour

message: This entire article is full of factual errors.  It is not even "metric hour", but decimal hour.  It was never part of the metric system, nor ever called "metric hour".  The 1793 decree stated:
:XI. Le jour, de minuit à minuit, est divisé en dix parties ou heures, chaque partie en dix autres, ainsi de suite jusqu’à la plus petite portion commensurable de la durée. La centième partie de l'heure est appelée minute décimale; la centième partie de la minute est appelée seconde décimale.
Translated:
:XI. The day, from midnight to midnight, is divided into ten parts or hours, each part into ten others, so on until the smallest measurable portion of the interval. The hundredth part of the hour is called decimal minute; the hundredth part of the minute is called decimal second. 
And what does "The name of the unit was something like Chron" refer to?  Clearly the writer has no clue.  It also has nothing to do with the grade.  -- Nike 07:43, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: I moved "Metric hour" to "Decimal hour" and edited it accordingly.  However, I am thinking that this does not warrant a seperate article, as it's already covered in the decimal time article. -- Nike 05:33, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved