lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Whitehead No. 21

message: The article writes "Later analysis by aviation historians concluded that the design as a whole was flimsy and aerodynamically unsound.[4]" Yet the article goes on to cite 22 successful flights by replicas of the aircraft (20 Kosch, 1 Robertson, 1 German.)
Each word of one job title begins with a capital (Local Connecticut High School Teacher) while another does not (local entrepreneur and creator of Captain’s Cove Seaport).
The sole reference to the Wright brothers does not contain the customary link to their article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:3BCD:D200:55D7:D5C1:E64D:E1BD (talk) 23:14, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aviation historians' opinions dubious 

message: I'll italicize 'No. 21' in the title and text (or does the common name include "Whitehead"?) but the title and text differ on spacing. Is it 'No. 21' as in the title or 'No.21' (with no space) in the text? Or, as the Gustave Whitehead page uses, is the name fully spelled out as 'Number 21'? Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 04:14, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Spacing and name
Talk:Charles Cuprill Oppenheimer

message: Don't delete, he is a retired General, he founded teh Ponce School of Medicine, was 3 time dean of Ponce school of law, was Governor of Puerto Rico rotary, was 2 time president of Phi Sigma Alpha, more info on his biography will be found but I think it is established that this man deserves a Wikipedia article.
Eljohnson15 (talk) 07:38, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:An Tư

message: What are the Han tu for this name? Badagnani (talk) 00:26, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Han tu]] 

message: Have to do the D bit. See edit summary:
:This template is used on thousands of articles, and the term "Han-Nom" certainly exists) (current)
::The altering/creating/pasting of this template relates to the creation of Han-Nom duplicate. Therefore reverted again. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:52, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a temper tantrum. Whether or not you get your way at Han-Nom is not logically connected to the template issue. Even if we got rid of the article, my understanding is that we would keep the template, including the descriptor "Han-Nom". Only the links would be adjusted. Kauffner (talk) 14:00, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:BRD, twice

message: Toghon Temür was born in 1320. So it seems unlikely that he led an army in 1285. -- Wassermaus (talk) 22:01, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was this Toghon Temür??
Talk:Toaster (Battlestar Galactica)

message: I accept that this page is not really needed as such, - the definition I put in the disambiguation page is probably adequate. However I felt a proper detailed definition might be helpful. This is my first page and more an experiment than anything else - I also acknolage that as an article it needs tidying up, what is here is more  a first draft than anything else.
As for the term itself, I have heard it used several times in relation to robots and machines, it is provably used in the sci-fi and it seems the kind of generic term that one would expect people to pick up. - There are quite strong generic links between robots and toasters. 
As for the term being used to describe people I'm not so sure but there is an established use of the word robot to describe people. (I could not find it in the Wikipedia disambiguation page but noted that the page needed serious work anyway. As a slang word it certainly fits. I used it quite naturally and I'm sure others have. 
To me the term also connects within the context of AI.
Lucien86 (talk) 07:39, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Langkawi International Maritime and Aerospace Exhibition

message: Rollermonkey1 (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Talk:List of NATO reporting names for surface-to-air missiles

message: The article mentions the name Volga. However the article on the S-200 missile gives the names  Angara/Vega/Dubna but not Volga. It would be good if the correct names could be sorted out and listed in both articles.
It also mentions that the SA-5 designation was first applied to an anti-ballistic missile RZ-25/5V11 Dal with Nato reporting name "Griffon" but that this missile project was a failure and cancelled. Maybe this should be included in the list.150.227.15.253 (talk) 14:11, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  SA-5 Names 

message: I'm having a hard time finding any kind of source saying there's a "Growler" missile reporting name. It seems like this is some Wiki invention and not a real thing at all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.181.232.114 (talk) 11:30, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  SA-21 "Growler"
Talk:Great dirhombicosidodecahedron

message: This is the only contribution by User:Howellsm!
: The shape is also significant mathematically. At a 1972 Pasedena mathematics conference Dr. Steven McHarty, a professor of mathematics at Princeton showed using number theory that the Wythoff Conversion allows for inverse magnitutes of infinite series. This means that there are more points along any edge than are contained within the surface area of the shape, and more points in the surface area than are contained within the volume of the object.
Do tell.  What in heck are "inverse magnitutes of infinite series"?  — Seems to me I read somewhere (sadly the only reference that comes to mind is fictional) that the number of points is the same in any number of dimensions.  —Tamfang (talk) 07:46, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm skeptical
Talk:Angkasa Pura

message: * Get logo from id.wikipedia - done, need to update template with fair use haydn_likes_carpet (talk) 21:30, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  To-do 

message: I think it is time for make separation between AP I and AP II due to both are developing fast by about 15 percent passengers a year.Gsarwa (talk) 05:23, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: AP I and AP II should be separated
Talk:Terri Schiavo case/Archive 48

message: 70.231.140.181 wrote, above, that there was some feedback on the FA (?) process. I assume that means that someone or a panel looked at the article for quality, and said it needs some work, and specified what they thought the areas needing work were, or the directions along which they thought the article needed to change. 
I cant find that. I looked in the latest archive.
 Martin |  tk 07:59, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FA Feedback? (I cant find any feedback) 

message: Please see this diff of the Government_involvement_in_the_Terri_Schiavo_case page for details. Input sought - as I have a clear conflict of interest.
The links in question have been on the page for ages -without conflict -until I just recently started posting; Either the links are bad - or Calton is trying to provoke another editor -or both.--GordonWatts 08:16, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the links are gone because I found them while looking for spam: look whose name floats nearly to the very top when doing a link search for geocities.com. And Gordon, there's no statute of limitations for bad material, bad external links, and conflicts of interest (it's YOUR site, so doubly bad). If your actions can't stand up to scrutiny to the point you have to resort to ad hominem fallacy arguments to distract people from them, you ought not to do them. to begin with. --Calton | Talk 16:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am sure that you are aware that Gordon does have a special standing in this case, one that does not apply to you or to me: He was a petitioner in a case that was commented on by the Supreme Court, and so, as to that petition, he is an original source of information. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MartinGugino (talk • contribs) 07:42, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is correct, but I will not comment much on this here - other than to say that the world's wisest man had something to say about Martin's comment. Observe: "Let another man praise thee, and not thine own mouth; a stranger, and not thine own lips." Proverbs 27:2 (King James Version) To understand this in context, it means that Martin or another person offering positive feedback or confirming praise about me carries more weight than anything I might say -even when I speak the correct truth. That is because he can be objective, while I can merely be subjective and correct.--GordonWatts 19:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here: WP:EL#Links_normally_to_be_avoided #11, WP:EL#Advertising_and_conflicts_of_interest, & Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Using_online_and_self-published_sources - don't make up nonsense, Gordon. So Gordon's "special standing" notwithstanding, not even a borderline case. Of course, that "special standing" claim is utter nonsense to begin with, as laid out here. --Calton | Talk 00:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''More current'' dispute involving [[User:Calton]]
Talk:Terri Schiavo case/Archive 51

message: 72KB. Too big. Where is there room for compression. That whole "Five years of family conflict" section looks like a good place to start. The pace of the whole article really bogs down there.--SallyForth123 11:19, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. —Viriditas | Talk 02:08, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Do not delete other peoples' comments.  Instead, you should archive the older comments.Ferrylodge 17:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is too big
Talk:Kansas City Open Invitational

message: Actually the first KCO was held at Hillcrest Country Club, in 1938. As for the other dates in which the tournament was held at Hillcrest, I can not verify. I suppose what information you have is correct. (Comment moved from article page Tewapack (talk) 19:15, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: First KCO

message: As noted above, there were earlier PGA tournaments played in Kansas City. Here is a link to the 1946 Kansas City Invitational won by amateur Frank Stranahan.
https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1144&dat=19460715&id=rQkeAAAAIBAJ&sjid=zkwEAAAAIBAJ&pg=3766,5842584&hl=en
Whosnext23 (talk) 23:49, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  1946 Kansas City Invitational
Talk:Walsall Anarchists

message: Having been reading John Quail's The Slow Burning Fuse, I came across this article and was dismayed to discover that large portions of it are almost exact copies of segments from Chapter 6. This means that much of this article could be considered a copyright violation and will need to be rewritten or risk speedy deletion. Leutha appears to have copied the majority of this article over 15 years ago, with later additions made largely to bring some structure to the article but without changing the main body. I have re-written as much of it as I could, but the article still needs any direct quotations to be given the proper attribution and inline citations added. --Grnrchst (talk) 19:32, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violations
Talk:St. Paul Open Invitational

message: Is the author certain the name was changed to "St. Paul Open Invitational?" It doesn't quite make sense since the two mean different things.
Fschneid001 (talk) 12:54, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, look at Raymond Floyd's PGA Tour page here. Lots of tournaments were "Open Invitationals" in that era - part of the PGA's attempt to keep black players out of their tournaments even after giving them membership. Tewapack (talk) 16:05, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Blackjack Pizza

message: My company has never supported Planned Parenthood and never will.  Possibly one of our franchisees donated to planned parenthood and that is where the confusion comes from.  Vince Schmuhl owner/founder Blackjack Pizza (talk) 18:23, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if the basis for the boycott was correct or not, but there is nothing to indicate that it is a notable boycott attempt and therefore I don't think it belongs in the article in any case.  I have now removed it.  Gnome de plume (talk) 19:54, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction 
Talk:GQ Lupi

message: The use of the infobox  instead of  et al. is superior in two ways:
# The template does not display unnecessary fields with unknown values, which are filled with question marks.
# The template has the more precise section header "Observed projected separation" instead of the imprecise "Orbital distance" (which is linked to Semimajor axis, definitely incorrect in this case.)
:Therefore, I believe that the article is clearer if the template  is used. Spacepotato (talk) 01:51, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I do agree that this template has its positives.  However, this template only worked good for a small amount of pages.  Other than that, I do agree with that you state. — NuclearVacuum 02:10, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, glad that's cleared up. Spacepotato (talk) 02:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:Trover

message: seems longer that the max suggested by the style book.  Piratejosh85 (talk) 20:24, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: too long

message: In the section "Trover as an extension of detinue and trespass", the jargon terms "bailor" and "bailee" are used. However, they are not defined anywhere! What do they mean? Without adequate definitions this section is useless. Hairy Dude (talk) 12:42, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undefined terms 

message: thumb|right|Actions in trover were often applied to cases where chattels had been placed in bailment, such as goods transported on a ship (Russian frigate Shtandart pictured), which were lost, used or stolen.
I get it, it's a nice looking picture of a sailing vessel. But not all vessels are the same. This is a (replica of a) warship. The original carried predominantly naval guns, not goods. 
--2A10:3781:26A9:1:49F1:3C9A:8691:814A (talk) 21:37, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't think warships transport many goods
Talk:Breach of confidence

message: I have reverted this edit. If you think something can be saved and inserted using a proper format in the article, please feel free to do so. Thanks. --Edcolins (talk) 19:40, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Greta Johansson

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drives
Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips for writing better articles. -- Yamara 09:30, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Province of Sassari

message: Since 2021, the Province of Sassari doesn't exist anymore. It was split up to the "Città metropolitana di Sassari" and "Provincia del Nord-Est Sardegna".
The Italian page of Province of Sassari already was updated and links to the follow-up pages: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provincia_di_Sassari
The follow-up pages don't exist yet in English and it would be great if they could be created (I don't know how, I just edit typos):
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citt%C3%A0_metropolitana_di_Sassari
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provincia_del_Nord-Est_Sardegna
Also, all municipalities of those new provinces would need to be updated, both in English and Italian, maybe in other languages too.
Thank you. Garfield42 (talk) 13:44, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Follow-up page for Metropolitan City of Sassari
Talk:Step It Up and Dance

message: Re: "Perfect Partners" challenge edits.
Oscar's return comes with a footnote that he "won" the eliminated dancer's end of the challenge (which will be explained in a footnote). Michael has no "score" on the elimination table this episode because although he was featured in the episode, he did not take part in the challenge. James, Adriana, and Tovah who all took part in the challenge and were still eliminated earned another "OUT" status. Lastly, Jessica was scheduled to perform in this challenge (much like Nicole in episode 1), but left before the challenge and thus earns "WD" status. If there are any edits you wish to make, please discuss what you wish to change here and why. Any undiscussed changes may be reverted. Thank You. Projectlongbeach (talk) 19:26, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:William Stewart Simkins

message: For the record he does not seem to be a direct descendant of Eldred Simkins, despite what his father's first name would suggest. -- Kendrick7talk 05:36, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Geneology

message: I believe with the recent news of the push to rename Simkins hall, this wikipeida page should be protected. I found in this article a statement claiming that Simkins wanted the south to overcome its racist past. This statement may or may not have been true, but the statement seemed misleading. It seemed to indicate Simkins was not indeed racist, but in the same source used to show is push to overcome the "Souths racist past he also made statements such as this.   "I was staying at the hotel in my town when one morning a lady came in apparently quite frightened and in tears. I asked her what troubled her. She said she had been insulted by a negro. Ascertaining the name of the negro I seized a barrel stave lying near the hotel door and whipped that darkey down the street and into the Freedman's Bureau. While an information was filed against me they sent the negro out of town and dismissed the information without any effort on my part to interfere with the prosecution" He also talked about the creation of the Ku Klux Klan as an group that helped police the black belt of crime and inflammatory speech. He also derided the 14th Amendment, a Amendment that gave African American's citizenship. I am not claiming that he was racist, but I feel that the article is biased leaving out at least some of this information. Given the current situation at UT, it seems that this article needs to be updated with an eye for the impartial.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.101.70.7 (talk) 22:28, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for stewardship
Talk:WGOD

message: I've just finished the WGOD (AM) page and am in the middle of creating the WGOD-FM page which should be complete within the hour.  - Dravecky (talk) 09:46, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Both articles have now been created for your educational and disambiguous pleasure. - Dravecky (talk) 10:31, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: December 2007
Talk:List of minor planets/1–100

message: The list of asteroids 1-100 (article "List_of_asteroids/1%E2%80%93100") was created on 2-November-2005, by User:Python eggs.  Since then, more than 1,900 related list articles have been added, using a standardized format to coordinate and access the data recorded about 173,100 asteroids (or more). -Wikid77 (talk) 14:58, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Created

message: 14-Jan-2008: Now, in January 2008, I have added a redirection-name to the article at the end of the list: List_of_asteroids/end.  As more lists are added, then that redirection should be updated to point to the current end of the list articles. -Wikid77 (talk) 14:58, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Added end of list

message: 20-Jan-2008: The article "List of asteroids/1–100" generates 100 sets of date/year links.  Linking of every date, even when repeated, allows the selection of date-format preference; however, the year does not need to be linked: even if a registered user clicks "my preferences" to set date-format as ISO yyyy-mm-dd, the complete date can be reformatted by wikilinking just the month/day portion while leaving the year as plain text.  In the case of the 173 articles of thousand-asteroid lists, each 1,000 year fields can be unlinked to reduce wikilinks overall by 173,000, or 2*173,000=346,000 fewer year links across both the 100s and 1000s asteroid lists. -Wikid77 (talk) 06:23, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Year links NOT needed for date-format
Talk:Play It Again, Charlie Brown

message: In very general such lists are best served by sites like IMDB.  Perhaps, if there are wiki links to the characters and actors... but really... I don't think it is a great addition.  sinneed (talk) 21:40, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I can't agree, nor really do I see the need for the voice cast section just added.
Talk:WRRA

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for a sculling group in Ohio is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the Western Reserve Rowing Association. - Dravecky (talk) 11:12, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution/Archive 10

message: "Prior to the 1895 U.S. Supreme Court decision in the case of Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.,[6] all income taxes had been considered to be excises (indirect taxes) required to be imposed with geographical uniformity."
Shouldn't that be "not required to be imposed with geographical uniformity?" It was direct, not indirect, taxes subject to the apportionment requirement, right? -- Mwalcoff 01:53, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Article I Section 8 specifies that Congress could impose direct, apportioned taxes, or indirect, uniform, taxes.  — Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 01:57, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear Mwalcoff: This statement is correct: "Prior to the 1895 U.S. Supreme Court decision in the case of Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., all income taxes had been considered to be excises (indirect taxes) required to be imposed with geographical uniformity." Indirect taxes (excises) are required (and have always been required, both before and after the 1895 Pollock case) to be imposed with geographic uniformity. The geographic uniformity requirement (for indirect taxes) and the apportionment requirement (for direct taxes) are two separate concepts. Yours, Famspear 14:04, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't this a mistake? 

message: I put the Saturday Evening Post article link at http://www.restoreliberty.com/incometax.htm back in the article because the editor who deleted it did not explain why he believes it is an unrelaible source. Mpublius 22:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Saturday Evening Post article
Talk:Waltraud Dressel

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drives
Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips for writing better articles. -- Yamara 10:34, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Hermine Stindt

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drives
Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips for writing better articles. -- Yamara 10:40, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Grete Rosenberg

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drives
Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips for writing better articles. -- Yamara 10:41, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Klara Milch

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drives
Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips for writing better articles. -- Yamara 10:43, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Secessio plebis

message: How many secessio plebis were there?
According to the "plebs" Wikipedia entry, the secessio plebis "is recorded to have happened five times, although only the last (in 287) is believed to be accurately documented." So how come that this article only records three instances ?
Joe Gatt (talk) 10:44, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments