Talk:Cosmotheism/Archive 5

message: But, you had to find out for yourselves. Ah well. Soon he will be gone, I'm sure. Wikipedia will join the other 20-30 internet sites and forums that have banned him.
Nat 03:00, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: nobody likes an 'I told you so' ;)  Sam Spade 04:47, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)

text: But only if he "greatly" increases his "use" of quotation "marks" - DavidWBrooks 14:47, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: I told you so...

message: Given the disputes you're involved in, have you considered the use of mediation between you and those you're disagreeing with as a possible way to resolve the disputes? Jamesday 21:28, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Perhaps mediation?

message: I try not to waste too much of my time dealing with extremely bigoted and obtuse fanatics of any persuasion, but occasionally there excesses will prompt me to some action, even if it is only to comment.  
Archaic and little known but valid definition: cosmotheism = pantheism. ACCEPTED. 
Absurd and appallingly ill illogic: 
cosmotheism + bigoted, "racialist", solipsistic nonsense = Cosmotheism, AND THUS cosmotheism = Cosmotheism, and THUS  EQUALS the ultimate representative of all "True" pantheists, and is THUS justified in appropriating all manner of dignified and well heralded names of any philosopher or thinker past, present or future to its "Holy" cause. That it is plainly not the dominant view of all "right-thinking" individuals is only because of nefarious "ZOG" conspiracies, and the like.
I AM ENLIGHTENED! My Holy Universe! How could I not see it before! PV has the ultimate POV of GOD! ALL HAIL his stupendous genius! — since I am not deranged I do not ever say such things save with wearied mockery. 
Some people seem to have far more time to disrupt genuine progress in the world than to make any attempt at actually understanding it. The catalog of great thinkers who were NOT "Cosmotheists" in the particular sense is an interesting and yet invalid appeal to claiming that everyone who doesn't embrace "Cosmotheism" is an incompetent moron, and the dupe of "Zionist" conspiracies. Even with the wide range of nonsense that exists in the world, I don't think too many people are going to get hooked on PV's particular form of it. Thank the  KOSMOS! 
(By the way PV, I'm not "David Gerard's" "sock-puppet", and to my remembrance I have not as yet had any form of dialog with him anywhere.  As in many other things you seem to be a bit overconfident in your assessments of what is likely, what is real, what is true, and what is rational.) I assert that despite my irritation at your obstinacy, and your being an insulter of most people's intelligence, and an accuser of anyone who disagrees with you of being pathologically narcissistic (try and see beyond yourself and actually think about that diagnosis a bit), in your being a nuisance to a lot of other people, I have no ill-will towards you, and truly hope you someday come to know the true joy of really understanding that not everyone in the world who is inclined to disagree with you on anything is a total idiot.  ~ Moby  22:45, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Please discuss your suggested additions or changes on the talk page before adding them to the article.  Thank you. - Tεxτurε 15:39, 3 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  A response by Moby