Talk:Spit (album)

message: :Image:Kittiespit.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Kittiespit.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Spit (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/kittie/albums/album/302361/review/6067655/spit
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:36, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Something in the article needs to talk about how she left the band after recording and how Talena Atfield joined afterward. dannymusiceditor  Speak up!  16:19, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tanya Candler 

message: I was going to start it myself, but I figured it might be better done by , the article's main writer.
Anyways, the lead/intro needs to be reorganized a bit. A lot of the information is good, it's just that the ideas aren't really grouped together very well. For example, looking at what it looks like at the time of writing this:
In this order, it mentions:
#Album release date of Jan 2000.
#Band forming in 1996.
#Band signed to label in 1999.
#Album recorded in 1999.
#Album certified Gold in 2000.
#Album finished in 1999.
#Album delay lead to release 2000.
#Tour was in 2001.
Conceptually and chronologically, it jumps all over the place. Similarly, the critical and commercial reception are mentioned in different paragraphs.
I'll leave it up to you on how you want to reorganize, but you probably want to rework it so things flow more in chronological order, similar ideas are mentioned together, and some of the sentences can probably be merged together or cut out. (ie it mentions being recorded in 1999 twice.) Sergecross73 msg me 17:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Improved the lead. What do you think of it? Statik N (talk) 20:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's...a step in the right direction...but I don't feel like its fully fixed... Sergecross73 msg me 14:00, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: What else should I work on? Statik N (talk) 22:10, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrangement of info in [[WP:LEAD]]