Talk:Feminist theology

message: Changed around the third paragraph slightly; in particular, I removed the statement, "All these denominations forbid women from being recognized as religious clergy and scholars in the same way that men are accepted."  While the first half of the statement may be accurate, the second half is definitely not.  While I can only speak to the Roman Catholic Church, the failure to ordain women does not extend to a prohibition on female scholars, and many of the best feminist scholars in academia are Roman Catholic sisters or laywomen. Makrina 02:03, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-ordination / Scholarship of Women 

message: ----
I was raised Southern Baptist where women are not to be clergy.  I have since joined the United Methodist Church and like a lot of it's stuff a lot more.  As that I'm male, female ordination has never really been an issue (it doesn't directly affect me).  However, I have a number of friends who are very much into feminist theology.  I like the passage about Phebe but can't find a translation that refers to Lydia as a deacon or even a servant.  Help would be much appreciated.  :)
:I'm pretty sure that Lydia's significance was that she was that she sold purple dye. This could indicate that she was a business woman of some importance, considering that (good quality) purple dye was expensive. She was also important when it came to spreading the Gospel message into new areas. I don't know if this helps, but significant Gospel women that are referred to for womens ordination are Phoebe, Prisca and Junia - all which are found in Romans 16, also Chloe from 1 Corinthians. So after that lengthy discourse, I think you are right about Lydia. Yes, she's significant but not listed as a servant or deacon.CapHammer (talk) 12:34, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lydia 

message: Hi everyone,
Shirahadasha's excellent explanation notwithstanding, I’d like to remove the redirect to Religious feminism and copy the contents to Feminist Theology, for the following reasons:
1.	The first two words of the article are “Feminist theology”, implying that the original author was thinking of feminist theology, not religious feminism.
2.	In common parlance, “religious” frequently means “fanatical” – so the title of this article could have a pejorative connotation; viz, “Fanatical Feminism”.
3.	“Religious Feminism” does not exist as a Library of Congress subject; “Feminist Theology” does.
4.	Setting aside colloquial connotations of the word “religious”, the terms “Religious Feminism” and “Feminist Theology” mean two very different things:  “Religious Feminism” seems to indicate something like scholarship in women’s studies or gender studies that is focused on religion, whereas “Feminist Theology” is theology through a feminist hermeneutic.  “Religious Feminists” might include such scholars as Mieke Bal, Minoo Moallem, and perhaps even Simone de Beauvoir, although the term would quite likely be rejected by such scholars.  Theologians who use a feminist hermeneutic would include: Rosemary Radford Ruether, Catherine Keller, Carter Heyward, and Maria Pilar Aquino.
So if people feel that there is a need for an article for Religious Feminism, it should be a separate article.
5.	Many theologians are not necessarily religious—a few are even atheists—and would take offense at being lumped under a religious rubric.
6.	Feminist Theology is actively studied at many seminaries, whereas Religious Feminism would most likely be studied in the Women’s Studies department of a university, if it is recognized at all.
7.	Blu Greenberg (see Shirahadasha’s comments above) is referenced in the entry for Jewish Feminist Theology in the Women’s Studies Encyclopedia, and she is listed under Theology on www.myjewishlearning.com, so I think it may be a bit of a stretch to say that she doesn’t do theology.
I think that if neither Religious feminism nor Feminist Theology redirect, you will probably observe a decline in the number of edits to Religious feminism and an increase in the number of edits to Feminist Theology.  I don't know if Wikipedia has a method for tracking views of articles, but it would be interesting to compare these as well.
Webbbbbbber (talk) 20:46, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: I'm doing NPOV tag cleanup. Whenever an NPOV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.Jjdon (talk) 20:30, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV Tag 

message: The should maybe be information somewhere about reports that certain feminist theologians had been practicing feminist baptisms, baptisms involving a theological modalism that effectively replaces the names of the trinitarian persons with gender-neutral terms such Creator, Redeemer and Sanctifier. These unusual baptisms were subsequently deemed invalid by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which felt obligated to re-affirm that only the words Father, Son and Holy Spirit were     in conformity with Christ's apostolic mandate.   ADM (talk) 09:50, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Feminist baptisms

message: The following was all taken from the above page. I do not know exactly how to incorporate it here, but it's far too long for the general overview page. Zujine (talk) 14:54, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed from the [[Feminist movement]] page 

message: Shouldn't the Hindu deity Kali be mentioned in here somewhere?
Hokie Tech (talk) 19:15, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kali 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Feminist theology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140520012146/http://huc.edu:80/faculty/faculty/MargaretWenig.shtml to http://huc.edu/faculty/faculty/MargaretWenig.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130208064320/http://www.feminismeislamic.org:80/eng/index.htm to http://www.feminismeislamic.org/eng/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Feminist theology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080705015023/http://www.bwpjc.org/slc.htm to http://www.bwpjc.org/slc.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/Features/Columns/?article=WomenWhoRule
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Feminist theology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150320074746/http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2002/569/cu1.htm to http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2002/569/cu1.htm
*Added  tag to http://urj.org/Articles/index.cfm?id=11422
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:25, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:29, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: There no sentence “Mary Daly has done more than anyone to clarify the problems women have concerning the central core symbolism of Christianity, and its effects on their self-understanding and their relationship to God.” at . Not at page 242 nor at another page. Alexander Roumega (talk) 07:57, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This sentence appears in Ford, D (Ed). 1989. "The Modern Theologians: An Introduction to Christian Theology in the Twentieth Century". Volume 2, page 242. Author Ann Loades. Basil Blackwell Ltd, Oxford, UK 105.184.165.156 (talk) 12:51, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Mary Daly citation not in source 

message: — Assignment last updated by Xinyue Hu (talk) 13:29, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CMN2160B