Talk:Scrubs (TV series)

message: Ted is mentioned for the first time in the end of the Episodes section with no explanation of who he is (full name, role etc). As a minor but recurring character he should probably be mentioned somewhere before he is referred to, and his relationship with JD etc explained. Dichohecho (talk) 12:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Found his wiki link and moved it to the first reference. Dichohecho (talk) 12:29, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

text: That's because she was never a main character, but a recurring guest star; that section only lists the main characters. Jordan is mentioned in the Episodes section of the main article and her character listing is located here List of Scrubs characters#Jordan Sullivan. Drovethrughosts (talk) 14:11, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character Listing 

message: Re: Scrubs TV Series 
What I wrote creates an important issue. The requirement of Wikipedia justifies removal would be      
"no original research or opinion"  I wrote "Scrubs is was one of the rare comedic series of the era that did not have a laugh track.  One episode had one to show the contrast"  Having watched the entire series, including the one mentioned, this is factual.  A quick survey showed nothing in print that stated what I did. Unlike my claiming that I had a talk with a creature from another galaxy, this entire series was viewed by millions.  If another viewer who could refute that there was this single laugh track exception, or it was for another reason than emphasizing the contrast, that person should be able to remove my statement. 
This is a rare exception of Wikipedia allowing a statement of fact that has no printed support, but it is informative in describing a genre and an era. The key to my objection is that it narrows the legitimate scope of Wikipedia,  The phrase "One user notes" should be an acceptable variation in the rules, so that a different single viewer, in this case who has seen every episode, could remove such comments as mine. 
In effect I'm suggesting that a given statement that is interesting but not newsworthy should be allowed to stand, but conditionally, such as the words, One viewer notes, or (OVN) perhaps at the end of the statement. Perhaps this should only be available to certain users, like a long period of making edits (15 yrs for me
Arodb (talk) 15:40, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't the one who reverted you, but I can explain why. What you added was original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. Yes, Scrubs is a single-camera comedy, which is a statement that generally does not need a citation. But, you claim that it is a "rare comedic series of the era without a laugh track". The words I italicized are what moves this statement into OR territory. Do you have a source to back this up? There is several other single-camera comedies from the 2000s and even the 1990s by looking at these categories: :Category:1990s American single-camera sitcoms and :Category:2000s American single-camera sitcoms. Drovethrughosts (talk) 15:52, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Including in the article a fact that does not have published article support 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Find the Saltine and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#Find the Saltine until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 18:33, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Find the Saltine" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Knife/Wrench and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#Knife/Wrench until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 18:41, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Knife/Wrench" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Scrubs(series) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 22:20, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Scrubs(series)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]