lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sahg

message: The article reads like a friend's band bio. Needs to be more objective and generally cleaned up.
130.240.217.153 (talk) 06:48, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaning up

message: Hello, i added a picture of the band i took a few months ago. I licensed it as a free "public domain" picture, hope it helps ! I also created a french version of this page... would someone tell me how to link it here ? Thanks !
Dexxie (talk) 12:46, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added picture
Talk:Heat therapy

message: Here is the content that bothers me the most: "Another use is the treatment of infection and cancers by the use of heat. Cancer cells and many bacteria have poor mechanisms for adapting to and resisting the physiological stresses of heat, and are more vulnerable to heat-induced death than normal cells.[citation needed]"
Instead of just putting a [citation needed], can't it just be deleted until a proper reference is found?
Medicalcaremark (talk) 06:45, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The request for citation is dated 2011. If you think the content is controversial it can be deleted.--Auró (talk) 22:21, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with some content 
Talk:IFL (chemotherapy)

message: The WikiProject classification for IFL (chemotherapy) is Start-class. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria. If it should be a stub, then please set  on this talk page & reinstate the stub tag(s) on the article page.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  14:11, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Reclassified as stub. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 11:06, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please confirm classification
Talk:Indication (medicine)

message: didn't we used to use the word effects insted of indications..... not many people will know wtf indications mean, i for one didn't! Pinner458 (talk) 17:27, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effects 

message: In the following sentence, it says that the FDA includes indications for medications, but this seems strange as normally the pharmaceutical company would include the package insert: 'In the United States, indications for medications are strictly regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which includes them in the package insert under the phrase "Indications and Usage".' Would it work to change "which includes them" to "which are included"? --BB12 (talk) 07:51, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, lolthe entity including them is not clear. It may be the FDA, the pharma company, the larger government, or consumer demand. It is better to use passive voice.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:09, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who includes the indications? 

message: We are a group of students who would like to make the following edits on this page primarily in the drugs section:
* Add information on how drugs are approved for labeled indications Kristinignacio (talk) 05:32, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pharmacy Students' Suggested Wiki Edits 

message: Group 15 Peer Review:
 1. Does the draft submission reflect a neutral point of view? 
 This group added a lot of new content to this wikipedia page, and I believe that all the draft submission reflects a neutral point of view because the statements added are facts rather than opinions. In addition to writing the information in a neutral tone, the group also provided pros and cons of the application of a medical indication to allow the reader to weigh both the benefits and risks of the use of an indication use. -Stephanie Sin (Stephaniesin (talk) 20:49, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the introduction section was brief and added a summary of what we discuss in the "Drugs" section! JN1018 (talk) 09:14, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pharmacy Student Peer Reviews
Talk:Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

message: should be combined with larger article Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) since HIPEC is more commonly used term.  (Perform google search and literature search to confirm)
* "Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Chemotherapy" (IPHC) 5,500 results
* "Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy" (HIPEC) 50,000 results
* "Intraoperative Chemohyperthermic Peritoneal Perfusion" (CHPP) 492 results
* "Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Chemoperfusion" (IHCP)  15,900 results
all refer to the same procedure.  search results results returned from google search with the search term placed in parentheses so that only exact phrase is matched.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.15.232.10 (talk) 23:46, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: Pulled this from the article:
[quote]
It is no longer considered an experimental cancer therapy.http://appendix-cancer.blogspot.com/2010/12/cigna-covers-hipec.html
The NCCN guidelines on colon cancer as of version 3.2014 still consider HIPEC to be investigational. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/colon.pdf MS-43.
- Emt147 Burninate! 00:28, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Investigational status
Talk:Ceftobiprole

message: Please check the stereo at the pyrrolidine ring  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChemSpiderMan (talk • contribs) 03:48, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The stereochemistry in the image in this article matches the stereochemistry in the structure at the pubchem link.  Do you think there is an error?  -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:53, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stereo in structure 

message: From the article:
:It has been shown to be statistically non-inferior to the combination of vancomycin and ceftazidime...
I understand the term is used in the context of clinical trials, but "non-inferior" certainly sounds awkward. Especially when you can just as easily say "equivalent or superior". --David Iberri (talk) 21:54, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed that non-inferior sounds weird but in statistics there's a distinct difference between non-inferior and superior.  It would be incorrect to say the drug is superior to vanco/ceftazidine, but I think saying they are equivalent would be appropriate. Hojoseph99 (talk) 23:44, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Non-inferior"?

message: Regarding: "Ceftobiprole has been approved for use in Canada and Switzerland, and is under review by regulatory authorities in the United States, the European Union, Australia, Russia and South Africa."
Perhaps it should be mentioned that Janssen-Ortho has discontinued sales in Canada in response to recent regulatory recommendations in the United States and European Union to not approve ZEFTERA for this indication due to concerns regarding the conduct of clinical trials.
See Health Canada website for more information:
http://hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/medeff/advisories-avis/prof/_2010/zeftera_nth-aah-eng.php  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Undefinedobject (talk • contribs) 22:44, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zeftera (ceftobiprole medocaril) is discontinued in Canada 

message: The left-hand-side of the structure is incorrect as drawn. 
A large number of cephems have heteroaryloxime moieties. This is not the same as the (incorrect) nitroso alkene tautomer that has been drawn. 
Somebody please correct this. 
Also, please just draw the protons at C6 and C7. And remove the wedge between C6 and the b-lactam nitrogen. It's just ugly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.156.179.178 (talk) 01:23, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure 
Talk:Ionotophoresis

message: I have just inserted a "See also" section, in the Hyperhidrosis article, and put in a reference to this Ionotophoresis article. Then, I noticed that the main body (Treatments, other) already has a reference to Iontophoresis. This page is a stub (in its most extreme form), and an orphan; the other is a substantial article that seems (to me) to cover this article's material completely. I assume, therefore, that this article is a miss-spelling, and can be proposed for deletion. However, I am no expert on this, so I had better leave it to someone who is, to perform the Prod operation. TheAMmollusc (talk) 12:09, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to delete this article
Talk:Isoliquiritigenin

message: I think this page may need an expert. The study cited saying that the compound is more potent than diazepam reports a higher binding affinity (0.4 (ILTG) vs 0.06 (diazepam) micromolar or something like that.) But i thought a higher number of that value actually indicated weaker binding. As in, it takes a higher concentration to have an effect, or some such. morsontologica (talk) 08:06, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  More potent than diazepam? Confusing info in study cited
Talk:Jaipur foot

message: Please note that the obituary for Dr. Sethi in New York Times indicates he developed the Jaipur "foot" (as it is referenced by NYT) with the help of "Ramachandra Sharma, a semiliterate craftsman who had been teaching lepers to make handicrafts and who became his assistant".  The Wiki article here should be updated if the NYT obit is accurate.
Thanks -
Todd Todd (talk) 13:08, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Lancet obit refers to him as "Ram Chandra", "Chandra" and "Ram Chandra Sharma". I wonder if the Sharma is an honorific? Espresso Addict (talk) 09:09, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: So far I have references for $50, 250 rupees or 3 euros, $28, $80 or $50-$100, $65, $33 and $45, which is what the article currently says. Any ideas for a more authoritative source or a way to reconcile these numbers? I suspect the actual answer is that it varies significantly based on who is making it and where, the materials used, etc, but I can't find a source to back that claim up. Rusalkii (talk) 21:59, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cost
Talk:Jendrassik maneuver

message: I thought the reason why this maneuvre works is a disinhibition of Ia - afferences caused by it???
91.113.31.84 (talk) 16:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: I think it is important to expand on the mechanism of action of the maneuver, as this is probably what most people are looking for when visiting the page
86.155.110.81 (talk) 11:11, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mechanism of Action
Talk:Joint injection

message: * Add history and epidemiology of joint injection (MA)
* More succinctly summarize efficacy in osteoarthritis. Summarize efficacy in other indications (other inflammatory conditions, specifically rheumatoid arthritis) (PI)
* Add risks of joint injection (KJ)
* Add general principles of joint injection/modalities (DD)
* Remove references to primary literature and replace with secondary literature (MA, PI, KJ, DD)
D Dickinson SF (talk) 20:59, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Foundations II Group 14 Proposed Edits
Talk:Lumpectomy

message: To this article I hope to add more information about the history behind lumpectomies as well as a general in-depth description about the procedure with citations to verify all the information and make sure it is all reliable.
Potential Bibliography: 
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12393820
https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/lumpectomy/about/pac-20394650
https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/treatment/surgery-for-breast-cancer.html
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28391871
Celsisa (talk) 03:50, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: note
Talk:List of field marshals

message: http://northafricapost.com/18986-libya-haftar-receiving-israeli-weaponry.html
they designate haftar as a field marshall in this article you guys
:Yes, does appear to have been promoted FM. I've added him. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Khalifa Haftar]]

message: I noticed USA is not here, thought I should bring it up PointyPenBoy (talk) 19:33, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: America doesn't have any field marshals. They either had the 5-star General of the Army or 6-star General of the Armies (and neither rank is currently in use). - wolf 00:38, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for the addition of America
Talk:Medical restraint

message: Nothing on people's right not to be restrained? ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 13:48, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing on people's right not to be restrained? 

message: — Assignment last updated by MiGraber (talk) 13:45, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ENGL 101 English Composition
Talk:Medical tattoo

message: While there is no trade group of tattoo parlours or artists, a medical group such as the AMA should standardize the many tattoo designs and their location 
http://www.diabetesadvocacy.com/tattoos.htm
so that EMT's and ER physicians cannot miss the tattoo.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2009-05-13-medicaltattoos_N.htm?csp=34
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/DiabetesResource/Story?id=4028385&page=1
Since medic alert bracelets can break and be lost in a crisis, this is an important trend.
rumjal 11:31, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Standard Design and location

message: I have removed some crap, but I think it is highly likely that that other example of medical tattooing should be removed or changed. We may report that there is/was speculation about the possibility that certain tattoos were medical tattoos, but I did some googling and that revealed that much of that speculation came from sources I would not consider reliable. Would you please be so kind to take a look? (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk)  20:49, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I see what you mean.  Will look.  Not today... Jytdog (talk) 20:50, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you. The first two paragraphs of the History section made my bullshit detector tingle. (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk)  20:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculation about old medical tattoos
Talk:Medihoney

message: Why can this not just be a section in the Manuka honey article? Alrich44 (talk) 17:19, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  I merged this into the Manuka honey article. Alrich44 (talk) 21:58, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Manuka honey
Talk:Royal Oldham Hospital

message: Proposal: merge Radio Cavell into Royal Oldham Hospital.
This has a terrible amount of detail, and is not clearly notable. It has been tagged for over a decade for various issues. Let's just merge it, which should be non-controversial. Bearian (talk) 20:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi - I think a case could be made for its notability as the birthplace of Louise Brown. And in recent weeks, sadly, Greater Manchester has been at the epicentre of the COVID crisis in the UK. Just my view. Dormskirk (talk) 23:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  The proposal is to merge Radio Cavell into Royal Oldham Hospital (but I agree that wasn't made very clear). The hospital is definitely notable. Lennart97 (talk) 22:53, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Welcome to Durham, USA

message: I have been told that this movie has a significant amount of bias. I live in Durham myself, but I have not seen the film yet. Can anyone back the whole 'bias' thing up? I'd like to hear from others.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.111.215.191 (talk) 02:36, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias?
Talk:Oldham East and Saddleworth (UK Parliament constituency)

message: If the election result was void (not voidable), as the ruling says, that means that it never occurred, and Phil Woolas has not been the MP since 6 May 2010 - since then there has been no MP. I presume this needs to be changed?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.40.149.194 (talk) 14:49, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No that's wrong the seat is not vacant, Phil Woolas is still the MP but is barred from sitting in the Commons.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.19.42 (talk) 15:55, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The current legal situation is that there is currently no Member of Parliament for this seat but the by-election is on hold pending the former MP's attempt to seek a Judicial Review.  - Galloglass 18:09, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This problem is now resolved as the reviewing Court upheld one of the voidability arguments.  The distinction is regularly misunderstood, even by lawyers who do not practice in litigation or contract law (void or voidable?).  Void can mean void ab initio or void from the date of the judgment (aka "set aside or unenforceable from xx date) which are the more clear and common terms used), which means any transactions during Mr Woolas's tenure: money he has earnt or expenses he incurred can, under the law as it stands and judgment as made in accordance with historic rulings, be kept.  Adam37 (talk) 12:05, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding Phil Woolas's Election Result
Talk:Demographics of Zagreb

message: It's important and relevant to have that statistic so one can see how many Serbs were forced to leave the city. 44.384	6,27%  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.240.132.194 (talk) 08:19, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can find the statistical source for the 1991 census (if there was one that year or one the previous year before or whatever) ethnicity figures then feel free to add it in Tweedle (talk) 09:45, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statistics for 1991? 

message: There is an error in the ethnicities table. The numbers add up to 779,185 instead of 779,145. Admiral Norton 20:37, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed now; the numbers were incorrectly copied from the 2001 census data. Admiral Norton (talk) 16:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in a table 

message: Can somebody present source of police data? If not, I'll delete sentence with number of voters. Plantago (talk) 09:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voters? 

message: Does anyone have data on the demographics of zagreb before the war? that includes the 1961, 1971, 1981, and 1991 censuses? Almost all other cities of the former Yugoslavia have information on this except for Croatian cities. However I am unable to find information on this anywhere. Can anyone help?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yugo91aesop (talk • contribs) 09:53, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  demographic history? 
Talk:Stanley Steemer

message: I was under the impression that the carpet cleaners were actually the last vestige of the stanley co, which made cars called (officially and unofficially), Stanley Steamers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.235.56.24 (talk) 06:53, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no connection between the two companies other than the coincidentally similar name. Night Ranger (talk) 18:46, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

text: I'm told they did make a legal agreement with the Stanley family for use of the name back when they were a small local company.  I wonder if I can find published mention of that.  Not R (talk) 14:11, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection to Stanley automobile?
Talk:Prince Charming (Shrek)

message: The article says he is killed in Shrek the Third, but there is no evidence to actually say this. It looks to me like the tower fell so that the window was over him. He could easily still be alive. Though he apparently isn't going to be in Shrek Forever After....
Mollymoon 23:34, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death?
Talk:Inverse hyperbolic functions

message: Corrections were made noting hyperbolic angle as the value of an inverse hyperbolic function, and the correct hyperbola as xy =1. The fact that areas correspond equally to angles for this hyperbola has frequently caused confusion when the hyperbola x2 − y2 = 1 is used, for then the areas are of half the size, just as in the circular case. The larger hyperbola became the standard of reference in the early days of transcendental functions when Gregoire de Saint Vincent found the area properties of that hyperbola, setting a grounding for the natural logarithm.Rgdboer (talk) 23:29, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The hyperbola used should be either 2xy = 1 or x^2 - y^2 = 1 for consistency with the unit circle interpretation of circular functions. An infinite number of possible other quadratic forms might be chosen instead, with arbitrary scaling. But the fraction of \tfrac12 is an important part of the area here (given the unit-length square as a conventional unit for area). –jacobolus (t) 05:36, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area
Talk:HMS Trafalgar (1887)

message: http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/yourpaintings/paintings/hms-trafalgar-1898-24670
©Geni 00:49, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's PD if Henry Morgan died before 1941. This link : http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/yourpaintings/artists/henry-j-morgan states he lived from 1839 - 1917. So his work appears to now be in the Public Domain : we are free to upload them to Commons. Rcbutcher (talk) 02:06, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've uploaded this and some of the other paintings by him to Commons. Rcbutcher (talk) 09:23, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible pic
Talk:Noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant

message: I made a number of changes to this article.
*The lead of the article refered to "selective" rather than "specifc" serotonergic antidepressants. I changed this to "specific" for consistency with the title.
*Previously the article stated that NaSSAs are agonists for "specific serotonin" which struck me as nonsense (what is "specific serotonin")? My understanding, based on the mirtazapine article, is that NaSSAs are specific because they have affinity only for certain serotonin receptors. Changed the article to reflect this.
Questions for someone with more knowledge about this:
*Is mirtazapine an example of a NaSSA, or is it (currently at least) the only NaSSA? This should be clarified.
*Do NaSSAs by definition have affinity for 5-HT2 and 5-HT3, but not 5-HT1A and 1B? Or is this just mirtazapine, and other NaSSAs could have affinity for different serotonin receptors? In the article, I wrote as if the latter is true, but I'm not sure, so please correct this if I am wrong.
:-Zefryl (talk) 16:52, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple changes 

message: I say merge this with SNRI because there's no clear difference on wiki and off as to the differences.  The structure is different-TeCA v. SNRI-but it seems like a marketing gimmick to me, and this type of drug is already listed...71.247.102.31 (talk) 02:08, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. --Arcadian (talk) 03:29, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?