lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Aerial bombing of cities

message: During the Cold War, the Strategic Air Command's 1st Combat Evaluation Group deployed radar bomb scoring units from Barksdale Air Force Base on board military railroad cars  to score simulated thermonuclear bombing of cities in the continental United States.
Maier
References
--Pawyilee (talk) 17:54, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Training for atom bombing of cities 

message: The article, and the linked article mention Germany bombing Britain and (now) British bombing plan. What of German activities against French towns and vice versa etc.? GraemeLeggett (talk) 07:34, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have read that the French and Germans bombed towns on the border in the opening days of the war. (165.120.184.15 (talk) 15:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWI city bombing 

message: This article is inconsistent.  It begins by stating "A species of strategic bombing, the aerial bombing of cities began in 1915 during World War I".    It then goes on to list cases of aerial city bombardment going back to 1849.  Mat Teja (talk) 09:19, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earliest aerial bombing of cities 

message: The 'cities' limitation is silly; you can't discuss the bombing of towns and villages? Such an article also wouldn't limit itself as "a species of strategic bombing," would not focus exclusively on bombardment during warfare, and would reference 'policing' and terror bombardment of civilian populations during the colonial and neo-colonial eras.Haberstr (talk) 08:04, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  A more sensible article would be "aerial bombardment of civilians" 
Talk:Blizzard Entertainment

message: Also, a few months ago, there has been a legal disputes regarding Microsoft's acquisition of Activision Blizzard, specifically, with FTC, the European Commission, and Britain's Competition and Markets Authority trying to block the deal, with FTC filing a complaint back in December. Should this topic be added to the Blizzard's section on legal disputes? On one hand, this deal directly affects the company, but on the other, the media focus is mostly on Microsoft, so again, I wanted to hear more perspectives on this. J.Pan79 (talk) 06:11, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  FTC complaint on Microsoft's Acquisition of Blizzard 

message: I've updated the paragraph explaining Blizzard's most recent projects to include the most recent updates for each of its game franchises since most of the projects listed as recent were outdated by some years. I've updated Blizzard's most recent projects to be accurate up to 2023. Please feel free to update and discuss any changes that need to be made. VN4066 (talk) 20:38, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blizzard's most recent projects 

message: Do you have any proof or sourcing that all of the various offices that Blizzard maintains in various cities are actually discrete subsidiaries? The subsidiary field is for literal corporate subsidiaries, not just the fact that Blizzard maintains a presence in multiple cities. -- ferret (talk) 15:40, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Boyohboy231 Communication IS required on Wikipedia. Can you provide sources that these are subsidiaries or should I go ahead and revert? -- ferret (talk) 14:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: do what you want Boyohboy231 (talk) 06:40, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Offices versus Studios
Talk:Samuel J. Tilden

message: "In the vituperative pamphlet war of the contested election, the phlegmatic Tilden was preposterously called "a liar, a traitor, a hypocrite, a briber, a conspirator, a thief, a counterfeiter, a defrauder, a perjurer, a robber, a swindler, a railroad wrecker," a drunkard, a syphilitic, a criminal, and a disgrace— but not a sodomite. Still he confided to a friend that he had never slept with a woman in his life." This seems to have come mostly from http://www.historyhouse.com/uts/tilden_hayes/ . If there is something to be asserted about Tilden's sexuality, shouldn't it just be asserted? What's the point of saying what he was not accused of? And then that "still" suggest never having slept with a woman somehow implies being a "sodomite"?  18:47, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Wondering whether Tilden Lane, and (perhaps by extension) Tilden Middle School and Tilden Woods Park were named after Samuel J. Tilden. The road is not named in 1865, but surely is by 1934. I'd appreciate any feedback. Marty Mangold (talk) 19:58, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tilden Lane (etc.) in Maryland
Talk:City of Palaces

message: From VfD:
Assuming that this isn't a copyvio, merge into Calcutta.  RickK 19:38, Jul 22, 2004 (UTC)
*hm.  We have pages for Second city and the Big Apple; on one hand this would seem to be a parallel, on the other I don't see anything here that wouldn't be better off in the main article.  If there was something a bit more notable about the phrase or its history (as there is for Big Apple) I'd vote keep; as it stands I abstain.  Jgm 19:52, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Quim (footballer, born 1975)

message: Quim is also an archaic word for vagina, which might be mentioned.
::Not archaic - people I know use it all the time. --Sachabrunel 21:28, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Still in much use - I dare say more so in the English speaking world than a Portuguese footballers name. Perhaps give the page his full name, or a disambiguation for 'quim'. Immature as it is to giggle at a funny word - 'Quim' should probably at least have a link the female anatomy 86.162.249.81 (talk) 13:33, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Female genitalia 

message: It's actually pronounced KIM not KWIM.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.16.124.153 (talk) 17:11, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but KWIM is much more amusing. AuntFlo (talk) 13:33, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kim 
Talk:Ultra Bra

message: Anyone know where they came up with the name Ultra bra?
I don't really know, but atleast the words "Ultra bra" is a type of larger brassiere in the English language. bbx 14:11, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I agree. Zarxos 23:16, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
Yes, the brassiere name "ultra bra" sounds to us Finns like "very good". I think it's funny play on words.
(I'm trying to find a name for a concert with 100% songs of Ultra Bra. I was searching for lingerie names, but all I can find is this strange Finnish band here ;-) Kassu 213.138.138.89 10:53, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomenclature

message: "The week before it was released, all of Finland was focused on Ultra Bra." Hardly. I was there, I wasn't. QED. In other words, unencyclopedic. 82.181.211.242 (talk) 21:58, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hype
Talk:Perseus

message: In this article I added 2 new sections of information that I thought would add to the article and added sources to backup that information. I also changed some wording. Anyone is free to add to my sections or edit them.
JCSmith123 (talk) 19:15, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits made. 

message: How long did it take for to travel over and sea 2600:1005:B14C:26AA:8C9F:F150:B0D5:A4E9 (talk) 00:34, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How long did it take Perseus to travel over and sea 

message: Anschluss called Persians the children of golden rain in his play, Persian. 2A02:A210:20BB:C980:6180:3D42:4883:E5F8 (talk) 09:02, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Persian and Perseus
Talk:Guadalupe caracara

message: Google shows that this article is a direct copy of .  I'm rewriting it with other sources and more info.
So he shot it before he set off from America in 1920?
:Rollo Beck? Yes, this is correct. There were none left when he left.Dysmorodrepanis 05:10, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There has been a discussion about the removal of two illustrations. I have collected them under a single headline. RhinoMind (talk) 15:51, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That it wasn't scientifically named doens't mean it wasn't known. The article also states it was common by 1876, the year given for it's naming. There's also the possibility that the year of description in the article refers to when it was moved from Polyborus. FunkMonk (talk) 17:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The Guadalupe Caracara was discovered in the 1870s so Audubon was not able to illustrate this bird --Melly42 (talk) 15:49, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed illustrations 

message: Just to inform that  removed this 2 images. --Pixeltoo (talk) 13:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images removed 

message: Please give a correct lable at Commons. Neither Brehm nor Audubon have known the Guadalupe Caracara (Audubon was already dead when the Guadalupe Caracara was first described) --Melly42 (talk) 06:44, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That it wasn't scientifically named doens't mean it wasn't known. The article also states it was common by 1876, the year given for it's naming. There's also the possibility that the year of description in the article refers to when it was moved from Polyborus. FunkMonk (talk) 17:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The Guadalupe Caracara was discovered in the 1870s so Audubon was not able to illustrate this bird --Melly42 (talk) 15:49, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers/Archive 8

message: I think that the whole discussion about the range of sizes appropriate for hectares is misguided. The difference in usage of hectares and square kilometres isn't in the size but what they are used for. Square metres and kilometres are measurements of surface area (size of one's appartement, area covered by a city, area of a country, surface of the moon), while ares and hectares are measurements of land used for some purpose (farming land, forests, etc.).
So, a 20,000 hectares of forest on a landowner's estate can change into 200 sq kms of forest in a newly established national park. Zocky 14:14, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size doesn't matter 

message: Bobblewik, could you provide some evidence for your (repeated) assertion "the hectare definitely is less understandable than the km² ?" I'm not ready to believe it without some support, e.g. a nontechnical style guide. 
Everything I look at suggests to me that "hectare" is the common and easily understood unit and that it has what I'll call a cultural correspondence to acre, i.e. it is used in the same context in which acres are used.
If I look up "acre" in the American Heritage Dictionary, it refers me to a table of "Conversion Between Metric and U. S. Customary Units." For "acres," the only conversion offered is to "hectares." In the other direction, the only conversion offered for "square kilometers" is to "square miles." I believe that the kilometer and the mile are culturally corresponding units, that the square kilometer and square mile are culturally corresponding units, and that the hectare and the acre are culturally corresponding units.
If I look up "metric system" in the (year 2000) World Almanac, I find a section of "tables of equivalences" in which, under areas, it shows 1 acre = 43,560 square feet, 4840 square yards, and 0.405 hectare. No other conversions are offered.
If an article said that a European car got 12 km/liter, I would very annoyed if someone "helpfully" tried to convert this to 30 inches per minim, even though this is a perfectly correct conversion into U. S. customary units. Dpbsmith 11:48, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: For a European car, you should actually say 8.5 l per 100 km, as that is the common measurement. Zocky 13:52, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Hectares: Evidence for culturally corresponding units?
Talk:Brian Bolland

message: The detailed description of the plot and themes of The Killing Joke seems redundant, since it is already covered in detail in the article for that comic book. Remove?  Mortene 20:59, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :" producing "a proper illustration of Jazz bassist Buddy Guy."[8] " 
The Buddy Guy that I know, and the one linked to here, is a blues guitarist, not a jazz bassist.  I understand that this is footnoted, so am reluctant to mess with it, but using something as a source that it wrong seems like bad wikipeding to me.  Einar Carptrash (talk) 16:19, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am wondering about this sentence. 

message: Couple of citation needed tags in the lead. These should be sorted out before nominating. If the cites are in the body then you can simply remove them. They should be sorted out soon or it could be quickfailed. AIRcorn (talk) 11:39, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  GAN Nomination 

message: Is he still working ? I see nothing much after 2013. Or is it just that the article has got out of date ? --  Beardo (talk) 20:29, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent work 

message: I've had a look at the book and it is clearly not independent of the subject. Bolland holds the copyright for the book, and it is all written like an autobiography. It can be a useful source for the article, but not for all the claims that it currently suports. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 00:35, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Art of Brian Bolland
Talk:Research and Analysis Wing

message: Can Sierra Six (one of the Gray Man novele by Mark Greaney) be added to the popular culture? CarverSindile (talk) 13:36, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes 2402:8100:2632:1FC0:39B2:971:7EF3:3A30 (talk) 09:20, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: There are no articles about it. सानू (talk) 16:49, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is the source about UAV program
Talk:Gina Torres

message: I didn't specify the date of her marriage to Laurence Fishburne because of the lack of definitive evidence. Various internet sites place the date at either September 20 or 22 of 2002, while IMDb.com sets it at September 29, 2002. --xjaymanx 22:15, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Marriage

message: Gina starred in the show pilot, parts 1 and 2. 1994 I believe. Episodes can be seen on <Fancast.com> Jimbcool (talk) 01:07, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  M.A.N.T.I.S. 

message: All the sources about Torres' work in DC Universe are too poor to be used in a BLP. . --Lexein (talk) 15:55, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you about the article I added that was dated 2012 so I deleted it but if you look at the link I added http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qxf6bUKpaDk, it is a video with Jens Anderson, the developer of DCUO, talking about the new DLC and he specifically talks about the fact that Gina Torres was replaced by Susan Eisenberg and all of her dialog was re recorded with Susan's voice. So Yes, that is a Recasting of the character previously voiced by TorresTheycallmetheDoctor (talk) 19:56, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Good. It's an official video, so it's potentially the best source so far. I see it happened at the 4:20 (!) mark. In future, can you note the minute mark where specifics are mentioned - that's a recommended practice when citing video or film. See . Thx. --Lexein (talk) 20:21, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better sources needed 

message: I assume consensus is to include the  navbox. Discuss? --Lexein (talk) 19:02, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No actors in navboxes per Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers/Consensus summaries. Therefore navbox doesn't belong here per WP:BIDIRECTIONAL.  --Rob Sinden (talk) 21:22, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Wrong. TV series, not film. Sorry. --Lexein (talk) 21:30, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not a rationale.  It makes no difference whether it's a TV series or a film, there is consensus against including actors and acting roles in navboxes.  Let's centralise discussion on your talk page, where the conversation first started.  --Rob Sinden (talk) 21:37, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

text: Please see discussion at Template talk:Firefly#Actors in navboxes.  However, as currently the actors are not included, per WP:BIDIRECTIONAL we do not transclude navboxes onto article pages that are not linked in the template.  --Rob Sinden (talk) 09:43, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Firefly navbox 

message: I believe she self identifies as Afro-Cubano.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:989:4203:2A00:ED64:7535:9FC8:1CBF (talk) 02:57, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnicity
Talk:B. Montgomery Pettitt

message: From VfD:
*This looks like a resume and an advertisement for this individual and not a valid article. Indrian |  Talk 22:29, July 22, 2004
*Delete in present form/ask the contributor to rewrite it.  This is an actual, honest-to-goodness CV.  The figure is notable, but a Clean Up crew probably can't know enough about him to write this in a narrative form.  On the other hand, the author of the article can easily make this look more like an encycl. article. Geogre 13:47, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Woodstock, Georgia

message: What/Where is Dean's Store? -jocago
:It houses the Woodstock Visitor's Center on South Main Street.  There's a little bit about it on the history page here:  Emily 20:55, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

message: The list of subdivisions needs to be removed as it includes neighborhoods that are in unincorporated areas and omits others. In general, it is just unnecessary. The same goes for the list of schools, alot of them are outside of the Woodstock city limits. Swatson1978 13:24, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subdivisions and schools 

message: The history is slightly off.  Woodstock Presbyterian Church dates into the 1800s.  I will try to run down an exact date.
Backer2 (talk) 17:59, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 
Talk:War of the Oranges

message: Looks like a copy of . Thue | talk 23:14, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: copy?

message: History of Portugal (1777-1834) is now being peer reviewed. Please, if you want, go there and state your opinion. Thank you. Gameiro 19:50, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to state that it is now a featured article candidate. You can support or oppose here. Thanks. Gameiro 01:54, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review 

message: It's not clear why the war is named as such in the article. I've hear ostensibly folk historical explanations about a French officer poaching oranges from Portuguese territory. 125.236.146.83 (talk) 07:15, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The article clearly states the origin of the name. --Technopat (talk) 09:53, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name?
Talk:Spanish–Portuguese War

message: Also covered in a very similar and better titled article at War of the Oranges. Thue | talk 23:17, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The scope of this article hichly surpasses the War of the Oranges, which is but one of the conflicts between Portugal and Spain. The Ogre (talk) 21:39, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Covered
Talk:GANDALF trial

message: There is an irony in that the presiding Judge over this case, David Selwood, has since been outed as a peadophile  Not sure how this can be integrated with the text in an NPOV way, but it ceratinly made me shake my head, esp as i gave evidence for the defence in the GANDALF trial thus witnessed his pompous 'superiority' face to face. quercus robur 23:24, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The current state of this article is very POV, basically it's an attack on the editors of Green Anarchist. No mention either that Steve Booth has since renounced the views he expressed in The Irrationalists, or that Saxon Wood was held exempt by most of the anarchist press for some of the, shall we say, more 'peculiar' views being expressed by the GA collective at that time.
A heavy NPOV edit and general rounding out of this article is needed.
quercus robur 23:59, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, the 'show trial' didn't 'collapse': Booth, Molland and Wood got sent down for 4 years each, although this judgement was overturned on appeal. Lets at least have some accuarcy here... quercus robur 00:02, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Well I've done a little more editing taking these issues into account.Harrypotter 16:23, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Harry quercus robur 21:57, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV tag

message: I'm curious as to the source of the SchNEWS allegation, given that their website coverage at http://www.schnews.org.uk/hotstuff/gandalf/index.htm seems completely favourable towards the defendants. --Black Butterfly 11:12, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SchNEWS 

message: After some search I’ve seen this article which seems to be a great source of information with some references and links.
http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/stephen-booth-operation-washington-and-the-gandalf-trial-a-personal-view-by-stephen-booth.html
"source/markup" version
Lanodan (talk) 17:23, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Anarchist Library
Talk:Johann Reinhold Forster

message: According to the Colombia Encyclopedia ( http://www.bartleby.com/65/fo/ForsterJR.html ) and the Britannica ( http://www.britannica.com/eb/idx?idxid=214014&alphakey=f&seq=117144 ) he was German. Not Polish, not Greek, not Chinese. Burschenschafter
The articles you quote are stubs, if that. They don't mention the place where he was born which you constantly try to "germanize". We go into a lot of details. Instead of "Ger. Expl." we explain : "Polish born of German descent". He was born (and his whole family) in POLAND, not Greece, China nor Germany. Especially, not Germany!Space Cadet 19:48, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Although many encyclopedic sources cited here assign J.R. Forster to the Lutheran denomination, probably more or less automatically because he was a subject of the later very Lutheran kingdom of Prussia, he was in fact a pastor of the "Reformed Protestant" (i.e. Calvinist) church in Dierschau (which had no Lutheran church); this also fits his Scottisch family origins. See also the "Talk" for the Wikipedia entry on his son George. I have replaced the first footnote by a reference to his 1878 biography (in German) in "Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie", where this is clearly stated.
--83.76.130.1 (talk) 17:17, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lutheran pastor ?? 

message: This Article has some serious mistakes. The place where he was born was in this time NOT Poland, it was Germany (State of Prussia)! It was only after 1945 occupied, so many hundred Years later. And he was of cause German.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.204.246.135 (talk) 15:54, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Before the First Partition of Poland, the place was in Poland... —Kusma (t·c) 16:02, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  He was German and born in Germany