Talk:East Stirlingshire F.C.

message: Champions League? --TheMadTim 02:02, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: What is this all about. 24 hours after East Stirlingshire was mentioned in a Norwegian comedy show, a fan club was created and now they have over 1000 members. Quite amazing. Should this be put in a trivia section?
* Not 1000 members, but 5044... It's free to join the supporters club, so it isn't that amazing. The most amazing thing is this: "The new away kit sponsors will we Lifeskills Solutions, with the reverse sponsors the Norwegian fans' website, www.norwayshire.no." --Sosekopp 18:59, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Norwegian fanclub 

message: I feel there are too many colloquialisms and the article is overly sympathetic to the club. I want NPOV.80.41.46.19 (talk) 02:34, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: This page really does read like a magazine feature 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on East Stirlingshire F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130130171412/http://scottish-football-historical-archive.com/stirlingcup.htm to http://scottish-football-historical-archive.com/stirlingcup.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111120012802/http://scottish-football-historical-archive.com/clublist.htm to http://scottish-football-historical-archive.com/clublist.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:47, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on East Stirlingshire F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160617174847/https://eaststirlingshirefc.co.uk/newsp.php?modnews=1854 to http://eaststirlingshirefc.co.uk/newsp.php?modnews=1854
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130924214203/http://scottish-football-historical-archive.com/midlandleague1.htm to http://scottish-football-historical-archive.com/midlandleague1.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150706110201/http://scottish-football-historical-archive.com/centralcombination.htm to http://scottish-football-historical-archive.com/centralcombination.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130129065422/http://scottish-football-historical-archive.com/elections.htm to http://scottish-football-historical-archive.com/elections.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130603145152/http://www.scottishfootballleague.com/stats/records/league-championship/league-tables/1910-1919/191213/ to http://www.scottishfootballleague.com/stats/records/league-championship/league-tables/1910-1919/191213/
*Added  tag to http://scottish-football-historical-archive.com/cdiv.htm/elections.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130603163748/http://www.scottishfootballleague.com/stats/records/league-championship/league-tables/1970-1979/197980/ to http://www.scottishfootballleague.com/stats/records/league-championship/league-tables/1970-1979/197980/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130224125148/http://www.scottishfootballleague.com/club/east-stirlingshire/ to http://www.scottishfootballleague.com/club/east-stirlingshire/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on East Stirlingshire F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120530010459/http://www.statto.com/football/teams/east-stirlingshire/records to http://www.statto.com/football/teams/east-stirlingshire/records
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150406043848/http://www.statto.com/football/teams/east-stirlingshire/1931-1932 to http://www.statto.com/football/teams/east-stirlingshire/1931-1932
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130314210820/http://sport.stv.tv/blog/217375-stirling-albion-could-push-for-the-play-offs-after-campaign-turnaround/ to http://sport.stv.tv/blog/217375-stirling-albion-could-push-for-the-play-offs-after-campaign-turnaround/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150910103508/https://eaststirlingshirefc.co.uk/ to https://eaststirlingshirefc.co.uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:36, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: Almost exactly the same time as this article, including its History section, passed a Good Article review in 2013, a separate History of East Stirlingshire F.C. article was populated with identical info. The situation has barely changed since then. Could anyone interested please indicate their preference for either the section of the main article to be severely truncated, or the History article to be returned to a redirect (taking care to include any differences in the added content since the fork). No need for both to remain at the size they are. Crowsus (talk) 17:27, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think they should be merged, I don't see why a separate article would be needed, especially when the information is basically the same. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 23:11, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I'll wait for others to contribute but I kinda think the same. The issue is whether the history is too long as a section but I don't really feel it is, and the length was similar at the time of the GA seemingly with no problem, and no attempt made to chop it down in the 8 years since, so nobody seems to mind. But silly to have it in two places in such detail. Crowsus (talk) 23:30, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agree with merge too Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:47, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is history here and in separate article?