Talk:List of MUD clients

message: What scripting does GMUD support? It's listed as a Windows client, so I presume it's the GMud that I know, not some GPL'd software (which would probably be "gmud" not "GMUD" anyway :) ). I've marked it off as "No" on all the scripting entries; they were all either No or blank except "Client-Specific" - if someone knows of a version that does do scripting, feel free to mark that one "Yes" again.
Also - I've written a client, a derivative of GMud, but way more powerful. Would it be a conflict of interest if I mention it here?
Rosuav (talk) 04:22, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GMud - scripting? 

message: Does running under Wine count as being able to run on a platform? Virtualisation definitely shouldn't, but as the acronym goes, Wine is not emulation.
--Earin (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 15:09, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Its a bit of a gray area, but I don't think running under Wine should be seen as the ability to run on a different platform because in that case every client can claim to be multi-platform. --Scandum 18:19, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wine_(software)|Wine]] Support 

message: Hey, I am afraid I'll ruin the Columns if I try to edit myself, but maybe somebody else is willing and able: The mud client "Savitar" is missing. It runs in OS X only and can be found here http://www.heynow.com/Savitar/
Thanks for your efforts.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.137.151.232 (talk) 14:41, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Savitar missing 

message: The Protocol Support section table header constains some acronyms linking to TELNET, but they are not mentioned on the TELNET page. For example EOR is not mentioned on that page nor here. IMHO such acronyms should be explained in some way. Either by linking to a page about them or in this article itself. JaBoJa (talk) 16:36, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protocol support 

message: I think that clients that can run with these programs should be clarified. Readers will come to this article to see if their devices will run the clients. It is unhelpful and misleading to declare that clients such as MUSHclient cannot run on Linux or Mac OS X. Axl ¤ [Talk] 01:11, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wine & Boot Camp 

message: I am a contributor to the source-code and an official forum moderator to both the TinTin++ and Mudlet Mud Clients so I think it would be inappropriate to directly make such edits but I note that links in this article for specific clients have degenerated as related articles have been revised so that internal links in this article that relate to the MushClient and ZMud clients are circular and (unhelpfully) come straight back to this page; whereas the TinTin++ and TinyFugue ones redirect to the history section of the generic MUD Client page which is not really much help in given more detail about the specific clients' entries in this article.
I would suggest removing the circular links and following the example for the BioMUD and Potato client links just include an external link to the clients' own website, for the two that I know these would be Mudlet and TinTin++...
SlySven (talk) 12:28, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's against our external links guideline to have external links like you're suggesting. I've gotten rid of the links that just redirect pas here. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 21:32, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

text: . Instead of creating more redlinks, though, I just removed the redlinks. Hope this helps. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:16, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix unhelpful links 

message: Can @Jc37 explain why they feel that the sections on MUME and MXP needed restoration? Neither are MUD Clients, the first is, instead a MUD game provided by a MUD Server and the second is a protocol for sending "Out-of-Band" data between MUD Server and Client. To be honest it feels to me that the first of these two sections is an advert, and the second should be moved to its own article if sufficiently noteworthy (though if I recall correctly that might have been the case in the past but was subsequently culled by an editor who removed such things for a number of "protocols" that MUDs make use of). SlySven (talk) 20:53, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections that are not relevant