Talk:Dee Bliss

message: it was told on August 21 2009 that Dee Bliss will return in late 2010 or 2011.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.133.87.22 (talk) 13:39, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What's your source? This rumour crops up every so often, and unless it can be sourced, it should be removed. If someone wants to add this information, then it MUST be sourced.--HillbillyProfane (talk) 00:23, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Return'' 

message: * - A wedding to remember.Rain the 1 BAM 18:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, I might use that for both development and reception. - JuneGloom  Talk 18:50, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Dee Bliss. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5volr71CR?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sheknows.com%2Fuk%2Fentertainment%2Farticles%2F811570%2F8-most-memorable-neighbours-moments-1 to http://www.sheknows.com/uk/entertainment/articles/811570/8-most-memorable-neighbours-moments-1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:10, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I propose that the section on Andrea Somers be merged to this article. I have made this change under WP:BRD earlier, which was reverted: see diffs for this page and Andrea Somers for details of how this would look. There are multiple reasons why I believe this to be appropriate:
#The current major storyline West is involved in is deliberately not informing viewers which character she is playing. It is therefore a direct and blatant WP:OR violation to include details on either article if they remain separate.
#Significant critical attention on the 'Dee or Andrea' narrative - a two minute search alone produces     in the last couple of weeks, and that's from only a single publication source. On top of the OR situation, Andrea as an individual character does not warrant a full article anyway - but Dee's article as is stops in 2003 so has no place for these commentaries. And it's critical citations we should be aiming for, not just story synopses.
#Andrea is inextricably linked to Dee. Upon entering the series, West was reported to be playing her previous character, and thus all information on that from late 2016/early 2017 is (correctly) found here. Having all information following the reveal of Andrea as a separate character in-narrative creates an illogical disjunction, and again prevents the information on the 2017-18 storylines from reaching their encyclopaedic potential by being divorced from Dee's storylines, casting etc. This is compounded by the current secrecy over the character West is playing.
In summary, keeping these articles separate is of clear hindrance to their effectiveness for providing encyclopaedic information. This is a rather unique situation, so I don't think there's any issue with giving it a unique solution. Any thoughts? U-Mos (talk) 02:00, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I oppose this merge. Yes, West is not credited as any character at the moment, however, IF it is confirmed that she was playing Dee Bliss for the uncredited stint then the article will be updated accordingly and the same will done IF it is confirmed she was playing Andrea for the uncredited stint at the Andrea Somers list entry. IF it is confirmed that West was playing Dee all along, then I would say that would be the moment that the entry will be merged with this article. But for now, they are different characters so it should stay as it is. — Hatio93 Talk 06:30, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The issue is that even after we discover who West is currently playing, problems will remain. Regardless of the resolution to the storyline (after all, these ambiguous episodes - and indeed the ones from early 2017 - will always exist regardless of any context attached to them subsequently), its entirety is highly relevant to the Dee article - where it's currently only mentioned in passing. There are already significant holes in the coverage, which would seem to be down to there being nowhere obvious to place the new information. Linking to a section of list article for further information seems illogical, as that section will always be less comprehensive than a full article (which has reception and production-focused sections). Clearly a full Andrea Somers article is not required, so the straightforward solution is to merge. Then all the good stuff around the current storyline can be used, as part of the larger whole of 'Dee Bliss'. U-Mos (talk) 12:02, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

text: Support as per reasons U-Mos has made.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.212.178 (talk) 19:53, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

text: Shortly before I logged off for the night yesterday, I did actually start a discussion at Talk:List of Neighbours characters (2017), but in my haste I forgot to notify anyone, so apologies for that. My plans to edit and discuss this issue today were curtailed by a persistent headache, but I think others have said most of what I was thinking and I also oppose this merge. - JuneGloom07 Talk 02:16, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

text: Oppose It is worth noting that confused readers logging on to Dee's page would read the "Return" section, and have access to the 2017 information as it was released to the public. The Dee article clearly outlines the introduction of Andrea, and any further combining of the two should probably wait until we have more clarification. SatDis (talk) 03:16, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger with [[List of Neighbours characters (2017)#Andrea Somers]] 

message: I haven't managed to find any info on this, but just in case anyone else has - is there any reporting on West obviously having had to leave filming sooner than intended this year? What a sadly ignoble end... U-Mos (talk) 09:56, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Botched exit