Talk:Apple strudel

message: Why does this article not deal with encyclopaedic matters such as origin, history, etc?  It seems to me that it is missing a great deal of information I would expect to find in an encyclopaedia  Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:17, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The purpose of this article 

message: This is stated to be an Austrian dish.  The Austro-Hungarian Empire notwithstanding, the references appear to be strongly biased in favour of purely Hungarian sources.  The current ref 5 appears to be broken currently.  I'd correct it, but I don;t have a clue where it should point.  Fiddle Faddle (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Shouldn't this be titled "Apple strudel"? I do think it's called by this English name in bakeries in the U.S. and other English-speaking nations. Badagnani (talk) 08:36, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirects handle that pretty well.  I'm more concerned about the tone of the entire article, which requires a serious cleanup.   Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:00, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Policy (not guideline) is pretty clear on this. Regardless of tone and other aspects of the article, a name change and CSG G6 of the current Apple strudel redirect is called for. Bongomatic 17:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: * http://www.zhfao.gov.cn/fyyd/cych/200907/t20090703_82832.html
--124.78.226.5 (talk) 12:52, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The chinese translateion of the dish is based on the following 

message: User:Rmhermen is reverting my removal of the "Apples" template where it was included by a novice editor wherever there was a mere tangential connection with apples. He further feels he is above the rest of us and that edit summaries don't apply to him, perhaps because he is under some kind of delusion that being en editor grants him some kind of immunity. Now on the second revert on four separate articles he filled in an edit summary on one of the four, saying "subject is in template hence the correct inclusion of the template in this article". 
If we go by that logic, that we need to add the "Apples" template to wherever an article mentions the word "apple" - every country or region that produces apples, every single dish that includes apples, every movie and song that mentions apples, Steve Job and Apple, ete etc. But then the work is only half done, for we will still need to include templates for the different types of sugar used in these products that use apples, the different types of flours, for example on the page Apple strudel, ..........
Let's be serious, that emplate belongs at Apple and the various pages on apple varieties and cultivars, as we do with grapes and wines. Or shall we add the grapes and wines templates at Coq au vin? Please, allow good sense to prevail. Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 12:27, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: If you wish to create separate templates for different aspects, you are free to do so. However as long as apple strudel is part of the Apple template (it is the dark black word because we automagically disallow self-links), it is a natural inclusion on this page as well as on any other article mentioned in it. There is no template grape but the :Template:Wines includes sections on General, Styles and methods of production, Grape varieties, and Wine-producing countries and regions and is used in articles on all those disparate subjects. Coq au vin incidentally uses template chicken which includes articles on chickens in religion, sport, food, livelihood and chicken diseases. Also "Comment on content, not on the contributor." Rmhermen (talk) 13:36, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It is my practice to "Comment on content, not on the contributor." when the contributor plays by the rules - like a little edit summary. Unless you feel it is beneath you. Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 14:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template:Apples 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Apple strudel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.wstlb.at/cgi-ma09/embed-wo.pl?lang=-de&l=6&doc=http://www.wstlb.at/ausstellungen/2007/kochbuch/rezepte/mehl/strudel/uebersicht-de.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.wstlb.at/cgi-ma09/embed-wo.pl?lang=-de&l=6&doc=http://www.wstlb.at/ausstellungen/2007/kochbuch/rezepte/mehl/strudel/uebersicht-de.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080608030627/http://www.df.lth.se:80/~thanisa/cgi-bin/wrapper.cgi?rec.food.recipes/ovolacto/apple-strudel to http://www.df.lth.se/~thanisa/cgi-bin/wrapper.cgi?rec.food.recipes/ovolacto/apple-strudel
*Added  tag to http://www.wstlb.at/cgi-ma09/embed-wo.pl?lang=-de&l=6&doc=http://www.wstlb.at/ausstellungen/2007/kochbuch/rezepte/mehl/strudel/uebersicht-de.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:35, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified