lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sulidae

message: I suggest merging both 'Gannet' and 'Booby' into 'Sulidae'. Any comments? Maias 03:10, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely should not be merged. Genus and family articles should be kept separate. The articles will be expanded over time. Mgiganteus1 10:03, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Mgiganteus, is the above a formal policy of the Bird Project or a personal opinion?  Further, does it apply to monogeneric families, which is at least arguable for the Sulidae? Maias 11:08, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I've found a problem in the taxobox. It was Eocene but not Late Paleocene anymore back in 47 million years ago.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheRealLTG (talk • contribs) 18:44, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Late Paleocene back in 47 million years ago, Seriously? 

message: In the article Frigatebird it states that the family Fregatidae is the sister taxon to Suloidea which includes all other families of Suliformes. However, if you click on the link for Suloidea it redirects to this article (Sulidae). So either the taxonomy of Suliformes in the articles for Fregatidae as well as Sulidae itself is wrong or Suloidea should not redirect to Sulidae. Because I suspect the latter, I propose that the rediction should be removed and that maybe a new article Suloidea should be created. Kugelfisch002 (talk) 00:16, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suloidea 

message: The lede states: "However, Sula (true boobies) and Morus (gannets) can be readily distinguished by morphological, behavioral, and DNA sequence characters." In other words, they look different and act different, but how many people in the entire world wander around with a handy portable DNA testing kit about their person, and how would they go about coaxing a DNA sample from even a friendly gannet in the first place? Asking for a friend. MinorProphet (talk) 00:29, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to tell a gannet from a booby
Talk:Navarrese Company

message: I am very surprised that no one withing Wikipedia has examined and corrected this site?  It is done in very poor English, and is hard to  understand!  This entire period of history has been clouded in darkness for far too long!  Perhaps some scholar can correct it?69.92.23.64 (talk) 23:02, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very surprised!
Talk:README

message: Hi, should we link the articles "Readme" and "Man_page" to each other? Seems useful as both are on documentation, but are representative of the 2 worlds (*nix and win32).
Nobodyspoke 03:05, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hi, should we link

message: I came across a file called DO_NOT_DELETE.ME  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.86.126.40 (talk) 06:07, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I came across

message: Is that a real word or should it be replaced? The Sanest Mad Hatter (talk) 00:17, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It links to a more thorough description, which is referenced. Yes, real. -- Quiddity (talk) 21:46, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "ASCIIbetical"

message: An anonymous user deleted the section "On GitHub" last July with the message "remove promotional literature concerning non-notable proprietary vendor behavior".  This broke a relative wikilink to the article section--following the link on the GitHub page labelled "README files on GitHub" is what lead me here.  I see that Greenrd made the new section on the current page and linked to it from the GitHub page on 8 February 2015.  No doubt that GitHub is a proprietary system, but it is also an extremely notable one:  Wikipedia's GitHub page gets more than 100 edits per year.  I also grant that Greenrd's original "On GitHub" section contained a lot of material not germaine to README files and that Snori did well in trimming it down last December.  What remains, though, is that GitHub's treatment of README files is quite notable.  This is particularly true because of its automatic conversion of the file's lightweight markup into something more readable in a web browser.
Actually, GitHub's treatment of README files is hardly unique among source-code-hosting sites and packages.  All, in all, rather than delete the section, the anonymous editor should have generalized the section to describe a feature often found among providers like GitHub--or at least waited until some other editor could have arrived at this article and done the same. NoOneAsked (talk) 16:35, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Anon user is in the wrong, but I've popped the text back, and tried to make it a little more generic - perhaps a whole section on Github was too much. The link on the GitHub page labelled "README files on GitHub" kinda sorta works even now. - Snori (talk) 06:59, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability of GitHub
Talk:Seatpost

message: In the early 1980's Peugeot offered an internally clamping post so frame has no external clamp bolt.  I have been told that over the years they have been more and more difficult to find and there are little or no manufactures that have picked up the concept - does anyone know why? or how builds these types of seatpost. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.4.69.136 (talk • contribs).
:I think it works in a similar fashion to a quill stem -SCEhardT 03:48, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Section on sizes should be expanded and rewritten (cannot do so myself as I am not an authority on the subject). For instance, section lists smallest common size at 22 mm, but I had worked on old Huffy cruiser tricycle (could be any brand back then — Schwinn, Sears etc.) which had 13/16 inch seatpost (.8125"). Some fellow in bike shop told me that was common Schwinn size from when back when, and Sheldon Brown lists that size as common on lesser-quality BMX bicycles. Curiously, Brown marks it as 21.15 mm, but simple math (13/16 × 25.4 mm) shows 20.6375 mm for conversion (Update: Brown could be just mistaken, as 13/16 = .8125, not .833 as he lists). theUg (talk) 00:14, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sizes 

message: It would be very helpful if the article described what the seatpost length refers to; i.e., how do I determine what the length of my seatpost is?  (Especially when it has an integrated seat clamp with offset.)   
It is obvious what diameter refers to, but it is not obvious what length refers to.
Analyticalizer (talk) 03:57, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length
Talk:Two-factor theory

message: This sentence in the text is not true:
While the Motivator-Hygiene concept is still well regarded, satisfaction and dissatisfaction are no longer considered to exist on separate scales.
In fact there has even been confirmation from neuroscience that this is true:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAEINhBXY6E&feature=BFa&list=SP4D6134DA073F7129  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.85.247.201 (talk) 12:36, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction needed 

message: Oakraiders3184 changed:
"found that job satisfaction and job dissatisfaction acted independently of each other"
to
"found that job liking and job disliking acted independently of each other"
I have reverted this because "job satisfaction" and "job dissatisfaction" are the actual terms used in the literature.
-Flangiel 15:04, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversions 

message: Proposal: Merge hygiene factors to two-factor theory
Rationale: As far as I know, the term hygiene factors is only used with motivation-hygiene theory. I can't see having a separate article. --Pnm (talk) 08:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge hygiene factors 

message: The phrase "Nicole Crampton at 18724 Aurora Colorado" which appears early in the article seems unconnected.  Going back over previous versions of the article, it appears that the original quote was "Please rape me" and then the name and possible address cited above.  Could this be a possible spam attempt that was only partially corrected?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.120.13.96 (talk) 08:00, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Abuse?
Talk:The One After Vegas

message: They decide to wait for signs that they should marry (for instance, taking another spin at a craps table and once again wagering on lucky eight) and are increasingly alarmed when the signs keep suggesting it's time (guess what Monica rolls).
I haven't seen this episode, but this is not how encyclopaedia should write it. I will correct it, but it will take time.-- Anupamsr|talk |contribs  14:34, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Some one needs to edit this
Talk:Catalina Hickey

message: Well, in Episond Y2K it's revealed that Catalina made it across in a truck so she came by land I believe it safe to say. But it was revealed that she is not "Mexican" in the episode where she dances at Club Chubby's so, maybe she's one of the people who came from C. America through Mexico? Or maybe she was from another Latin American country but lived in Mexico, but was not herself Mexican? What do y'all think? The Texas Drama King 03:37, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Where's Catalina from?

message: Catalina occasionally breaks the fourth wall by speaking in Spanish, usually speaking directly to the audience.
- Can someone post examples of this and translations?
:Does this count?  I mean, most of the show's audience doesn't know what she's saying.  70.50.53.53 00:04, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Misc
Talk:Mi Fu

message: The third one does not add anything to the article and the 4th have no relation to the article, it is just an advertising in Korean. Avihu (talk) 07:50, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  external links 
Talk:Monogram

message: According to the information about monograms, the New York Yankees' team symbol, as well as those of other sports' teams, would be considered monograms. I believe that adding this to the article would be an interesting and informative addition :) Twitterpated. (talk) 00:11, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sports Teams? 

message: i think that your artical makes no sence at all! u should add some definitions that make sence!
~?????  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.43.210 (talk) 02:15, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think u can do better 
Talk:RDB (band)

message: The article has obviously either been created (possibly by the band or associates of said band) to promote it. 
I have removed most of the advertising. however the current layout screams of POV. New sections should be created, and content should be organised accordingly. I will start doing this. Please comment. Sfacets 04:00, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reorganisation

message: Is that supposed to be Surinder Shinda? or Sukhshinder Shinda? I'm going to go ahead and assume that its Surinder - I don't think RDB's done anything with Sukhshinder. But if I'm wrong, please correct me. J.a.f.a.c. 03:45, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Surinder Sukhshinder?? 
Talk:National Unification Council

message: What is the relevance of these paragraphs: 
:At the 228 Incident memorial the following day, Chen, having delivered to that point a conventional ceremonial speech in the Min Nan dialect local to Fujian and Taiwan, turned suddenly to Mandarin – spoken in both Taiwan and Mainland China – and repeatedly demanded of his audience: "Is A-bian wrong?" (A-Bian is Chen's Taiwanese nickname.)
:He continued: "Is A-bian wrong in restoring the right to decide their future to the 23 million people of Taiwan?"http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2006/03/01/2003295143 Taipei Times: Chen signs NUC, guidelines into history], 2006-03-01 The crowd answered "No!" and "Go A-bian!".
:Chen then concluded his remarks in the Min Nan dialect.[ref]Video: mms://video.ftv.com.tw/video/060228/2006228P12M1.wmv[/ref] --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 06:22, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No relevance, and I have removed it.--pyl (talk) 14:00, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance?
Talk:The Federal Mafia

message: Would this work better as part of :Irwin Schiff? That article doesn't seem overly long, and this would seem to fit quite well. Seraphimblade 04:12, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was about to suggest the same thing. JoshuaZ 04:15, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Notified the author, if there are no objections I'll begin the merge shortly. Seraphimblade 04:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested merge
Talk:Judith Richardson Haimes

message: that this is not an objective article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.253.244.188 (talk) 06:50, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  it's quite obvious. 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian rules football/Players

message: Well it looks like out of the Vic teams, the bullies have absolutely rocketed away in terms of % completed.  Here is one title I am sure they will be able to win (unless they choke in the prelim).  πίππύ δ'Ω∑ - (waarom? jus'b'coz!) 04:24, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:WWF Light Heavyweight Championship

message: Could someone take out the J-Crown reings?All the champions who held the title before Michinoku aren't recognized by the WWE.Atleast don't put on the record/statistics list.--Justakija (talk) 18:26, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: We are an encylopedia. We publish what is fact. Those reigns occurred, that is a fact. WWE not recognizing them does not change that today.--WillC 21:06, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: WWF and the J-Crown

message: What is it? 215 or 220? It says 215 in this article and 220 on the champions list page.TheGary (talk) 16:00, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weight Limit 
Talk:John Wilcock

message: I spotted this article in the process of being deleted, for lack of notablity. I don't believe that should have happened, for what its worth I have some knowledge of the subject matter & it is more notable than many articles that slip through the net.--Zleitzen 04:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article states:
"The counterculture was nothing but a dull puddle until Wilcock kicked out the jams and ignited the underground press, which attracted absurd prosecutions that of course boosted circulations."
This is sentence is so richly unencyclopedic, I scarcely know where to begin.  Someone, please: rewrite it.
(Yes, the current style is amusing in a Hunter Thompsonesque way.  "Dull puddle," indeed.  But this is Wikipedia:  hyperbole is inappropriate and unwelcome here.)
Karl gregory jones (talk) 11:14, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone ahead and deleted it. Not only was the tone inappropriate, but it's also unsourced. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 19:57, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs rewrite for encyclopedic tone 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Georgewilliamherbert

message: Category talk:	5
Category:	4
Image:	51
Mainspace	1190
Portal talk:	1
Talk:	327
Template:	1
User talk:	434
User:	92
Wikipedia talk:	69
Wikipedia:	524
avg edits per article	2.30
earliest	03:20, 31 July 2005
number of unique articles	1171
total	2698
Stats generated using Wanna-be Kate's Tool. Nishkid64 04:38, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:La Calavera Catrina

message: Catrina shouldn't belong to the "sculpture" category. It was born as drawing, painting or cartoon and is a big part of Mexican tradition. Very seldom shown in sculpture. Esp. very rarely bigger than 20cm or in other material than papier maché.
Ozkar 02:08, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

message: The description of the mural is inartfully plunked down into the middle this article. It lacks coherence. The included material starts where the mural is mentioned in the Cultural Importance section then extends through the Location and Image sections.
I don't feel qualified to do the surgery. Mention of the mural and its significance do belong in this article. And conceivably some of the excised material belongs in the article on the mural itself. M.boli (talk) 10:48, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mural material should be summarized or put in a separate section. 

message: The citation superscripts in this article were added with sup elements, with the citations themselves as a numbered list at the end. Maybe somebody with a little time could replace this mess with cite elements? M.boli (talk) 10:56, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have put them inline. (I could not see where the 7th came from and have put that as an external link). It would be good if someone better as this could tidy them up. -- Beardo (talk) 17:58, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cite elements should be added to the text.
Talk:NCSA Telnet

message: Was Clarkson Telnet a derivative of NCSA, or the other way around?  I remember being at Illinois STreet Residence Hall in 1992 and helping set up the residence hall labs, and I thought we installed Clarkson Telnet, which is ironic, considering we were at U or I, home of NCSA.
Jim
----
Jim,
NCSA Telnet was written from the ground up (ok, not quite, I cribbed the terminal emulator from another project that I'd written from scratch, but in that case, I developed and owned all the code and contributed it to the U of I).   At any rate, almost no portion of NCSA Telnet was derived from another work at the time.  Sadly, there was very little available source sharing when we started working on it in early 1986, so we had to do everything ourselves.
Gaigeb (talk) 12:01, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

message: In my mind the NCSA Telnet, MIT TCP/IP and CMU TCP/IP software packages were the real beginnings of the internet as we know it today.  It was these software packages that first put personal computers on the internet.  These software packages democratized the internet and laid the ground work for the Web.
In 1988 I got the MIT TCP/IP code working on a 286 AT clone with a 3C501 network card.  Just getting this code compiled and configured probably took a week.  Later that year I got the CMU code running on a similar system.  It was slightly easier to get running than the MIT code.  About a year later I read about the NCSA Telnet project on the PC-IP news group and downloaded the code.  The code was so much neater and so much simpler that the other two code bases.  I was able to get it working in an hour or so.  These were THE 3 code bases for getting a PC on the internet in the early days. I believe it was the CMU code that first really abstracted out the driver for the different network cards.  Then the guys at FTP Software published the Packet Driver Specification.  I am sure because of the ease with which it could be built and modified, the NCSA Telnet code quickly became the predominant software used on PCs.
Laughingskeptic (talk) 15:37, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The beginnings of the internet
Talk:Pogus Caesar

message: possible reference: 
Pogus Caesar Interview, Simon Hinds, The Voice UK 1989
(from article Pogus_Caesar_Interview_%28The_Voice%29_1989) 
-- phoebe 05:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: reference

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article.-- Jreferee 22:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment
Talk:La Navidad

message: "When Columbus came back form Spain during his second voyage, on November 27, 1493 he arrived to see a bustling village but their were nothing left and when he landed, he 11 corpses of his men on the beach and only one Spaniard was alive and that was Bartolomeo Columbus. He warned them not to interfere with the Arawaks, but probably they disregarded this and aroused the anger of them. The Arawaks retaliated and destroyed the Spanish settlement."
This is incomprehensible.
-- I editted the paragraph's structure. Hopefully it'll be easier to read now. - Raimu
Bartolomeo Columbus is Christopher Columbus's brother, and didn't come to the Americas until Columbus's fourth voyage. He couldn't have been at La Navidad, seeing as he was still in France at the time. NeoChrono Ryu 02:42, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: No, the first european colony was by the vikings in Newfoundland.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.159.2.59 (talk) 23:30, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: First colony
Talk:Chōsokabe Motochika

message: The November 3, 2006 article replaces the deleted article. Fg2 05:18, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Possibly appropriate addition to this article -- but perhaps better placed elsewhere?
* 1596: Chōsokabe Motochika issues Chōsokabe-shi okitagaki.Hall, John Whitney et al., eds. (1981). Japan Before Tokugawa: Political Consolidation and Economic Growth, 1500 to 1650, Katsumata Shizuo and Martin Collcutt, "The Development of Sengoku Law." Princeton: Princeton University Press [p. 102].
Just another possibility not yet fully realized .... --Ooperhoofd 21:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sengaku House Codes 

message: I see he is also known by the name 姫若子 which appears in the Japanese and Chinese articles. Does anyone know more about this or at least know how it would be written in romaji? Thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:643:100:E62E:C97F:B7B6:CF70:96DC (talk) 10:16, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about nickname
Talk:Adulterant

message: The article starts off telling the reader that adulterants should not be in the substance they are mixed in with, which seems true enough to the definition of the word, but then chicory is included as a coffee adulterant.  Was there ever an incident of chicory being put into coffee to 'get one over on' the drinkers of the coffee?  If you want chicory in your coffee, it is not an adulterant.  It's an additive or flavoring or what have you, but not an adulterant.  --Geofferic (talk) 02:46, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chicory and Adulterant? 

message: I think it is incorrect to assert adulteration is necessarily "illegal".
In Australia (and therefore presumably most everywhere) many "medicines" MUST BY LAW be adulterated.
The most obviously well-known example is "pure" ethanol; it may not be sold without adulteration to make it unpalatable.
Likewise over-the-counter opioids may not be sold without adulteration; for example, codeine preparations must include "adulterants" such as paracetamol or aspirin. Substances included not for therapeutic reasons, but to willfully poison those who would seek to misuse the opioid.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.180.120.236 (talk) 03:12, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illegal? Wrong. Adulteration is often legislated 

message: On 19th of May 2015 AVA (food safty authority in Singapore) stated that so far they did not received any feedback about Fake rice, made of plastic.  - Therefore I was looking for other places or articles about this topic. Not sure this article can be expanded with this topic.
I just did some small search: 
* Wuchang Rice Scandal, YouTube Video about Fake Rice from 2011: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uw65n3ajZu4
* Fake rice made from plastic are on sale in Kerala: http://mathrubhuminews.in/ee/ReadMore/13398/fake-rice-made-from-plastic-are-on-sale-in-kerala/E
I also found the term: Adulterant, maybe it's better to add the above stuff to this article and only do a: See also section within Fake food. Opinions on this? --Never stop exploring (talk) 07:17, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rice section 