lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dirck Tulp

message: This is a translation of the equivalent :nl:Dirck Tulp page.  It is considered notable there - why not here?  He is notable as the son of the famous doctor, for being the last of the Tulp line, and for the marriage link to Nicolaes Witsen. Neddyseagoon - talk 14:20, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy candidate?
Talk:Valparaiso High School

message: This is going on three years now since the incident. The incident is probably no longer a salient point of interest to users of the Wikipedia looking up information on Valparaiso High School. I suggest editing this section of the article to a very minor point. If it's deemed important enough, there can be a separate article on the incident (or perhaps a part of another [new?] article on "Incidents of Violence and Mayhem in American Schools," to be lumped together with Columbine and I forget where else. The VHS article could contain a link to this outside article or section.) I wanted to put the proposal out there to see what others might think. If there's no opposition (or no response) after a time, then I'll make the revision. Xenophon777 14:22, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The text is still there and is still WAY too big for the article.  I cleaned it up a little, but didn't pare it down much.Loren.wilton (talk) 02:05, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I went back and made it a more reasonable size.Loren.wilton (talk) 02:08, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Slashing Incident

message: Yeah, so I got bored and started working on this to help expand it. Hopefully everyone likes what I've done with it so far. Feel free to give suggestions or critiques. 134.240.94.56 (talk) 02:11, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worked on it some 

message: Someone should put a lock on this page because it is always being vandalized. I changed the page back to where it included the history and academics of the school. Those two sections were wiped out for no reason except for vandalism. I thought that both the history and academic sections were quite informative.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.52.61.109 (talk) 14:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 
Talk:Aristide Bancé

message: According to the Swaziland national football team article, Bancé also scored a goal in a friendly match against them that was held in January 2015. It would be great if someone could confirm that, as this piece of information does not appear in the "International goals" table.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swaziland_national_football_team  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.100.23.126 (talk) 20:11, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Ilya

message: There are factual errors in the article.
1. Since the name supposedly came through translations of religious documents originally written in Greek, it is a "borrowed" name, i.e. not of Slavic origin. Therefore, it does not have any meaning in Russian or any other Slavic languages. A good description of the name's etymology is given in 
Elijah
2. The name is common in many (most?) Slavic languages, and it did not come through the Russian language; therefore, it is incorrect to call it a Russian language form of Elija  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.232.108.116 (talk) 18:19, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Errors

message: Apparently the name  "Ilya" also means "branch" in some East African languages. Could someone pursue this and amend the article? Thanks. - KP  198.245.112.110 (talk) 17:55, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Request
Talk:Cylindrospermopsin

message: I've just added a whole load of info. The images aren't too good since they are .png so if anyone can convert them that's be cool. I didn't use Cacycle's original structure (which is better quality) as the uracil group orientation didn't really allow the keto/enol tautomerism situation, and I wanted to keep the same basic skeleton shape throughout for consistency. Cheers Freestyle-69 (talk) 03:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major edit 

message: I thought the infobox was too long (link) so i broke the IUPAC name into 4 lines. However i am not a man of science so if what i've done makes the end result different please revert it. Thanks. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 14:01, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea about the smaller text. I've changed the whole name to this for consistency, it seems to fit better. It is a bit of a mouthful... There may be a better way to do it but I'm a man of science, not one of wiki-ness :) Freestyle-69 (talk) 23:48, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:Charmion (servant to Cleopatra)

message: Why!! Wasn't Charimon and Eias the two servants of the Queen Cleopatra and Mark Anthony not mentioned after and before they met there Death along side with the Queen and Mark Anthony?
Also Charimon and Eias we've like family to the Queen this makes them important alongside the Queen was (Charimon)-(Eias)Egyptian? These two servants we've they not from another Country? What was (Charimon)(Eias)affairs with the Queen Cleopatra besides being Servants? Where does (Eias) fit into part of just being servant what was her role? 121.72.208.249 (talk) 08:23, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why!! Hasn't there been a further investigation on Charimon and Eias whom we've both important to Cleopatra and Mark Anthony where did the most 2 important people to Cleo & Mark presided in there lives?prior before there Death with the Queen herself?Was Charimon a Egytian? Was Eias a Egptian ? Can this be found within the Egptian History with Due Facts of the Queen Cleopatra herself there must had been more to her Beloved Servants?
Talk:Last Embrace (EP)

message: Where did you get this track list from? My copy of Last Embrace, bought from iTunes has the following tracks:
1. Dutch Radio
2. Everyday
3. Galaxy
4. Last Embrace
5. Let Me Out
6. This Wreckage
This is also confirmed on the "Lyrics" page on the VIP section of their website.
Only Seconds has these four tracks:
1. We're On Fire
2. For All These Years
3. Stars of God
4. Waiting
:Whoever put that got the track list from the Japanese version which has a completely different order. I completely redid the article to fix this.Kiwisoup (talk) 23:03, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tracks
Talk:The Demon (opera)

message: I have removed the synopsis recently pasted in from http://www.music.lv/opera/Demons/default_e.htm Simply because text is published on the internet does not make it public domain unless the web site explictly displays a GNU General Public License notice to that effect. The web site in question had no such notice. I have replaced it with a much shortened and re-written synopsis. I have reformatted the article somewhat to comply somewhat with the Opera Project guidelines for article format, but much more work needs to be done. I have also removed headings for empty sections. Editors should add them when they've actually written the sections. Voceditenore (talk) 15:06, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Synopsis - [[Wikipedia:Copyright violations|Copyright violation]]
Talk:Japan Photographic Society (1924–)

message: Some IP just added a list of "The professional photograpers in Japan". Such a list would contain thousands of names, the huge majority of them Japanese, but here there there were ten, the majority of them not Japanese, none of them known to me, and (if genuinely professional) unlikely to be members of JPS.
So I reverted the edit. -- Hoary (talk) 10:58, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "the professional photograpers"
Talk:Attachment therapy

message: The Controversy NPOV template meets the 2nd and 3rd criteria for removal: "It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given;" and "In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant." In fact,the Talk page for this article has no discussion of the NPOV issue at all. I propose removing it. Mapping Data (talk) 01:19, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV Template 

message: I find this article to contain information that is no longer accurate regarding the treatment for attachment disorders in children. Most of the examples of ‘abusive’ therapy/treatment are from the 90s and early 00s, and things have changed since them. Mental health professionals no longer recommend any of therapies described in the article for kids who were adopted or came from the foster care system due to liabilities to cause injury to a child. 2600:1702:3800:3C10:65A8:56F2:FC6F:56EC (talk) 15:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated and factually inaccurate 

message: I think with the recent updates to this article, its pretty thorough and explains many topics on attachment therapy. It talks about the history of attachment therapy, and how that has changed with modern resources. I think the diagnostic criteria paragraph could have been stronger. It is important to note that attachment therapy is a more alternative therapy, and the physical aspect of it is more outdated and rarely used. This physical aspect of attachment therapy is not necessary and can be approached in a different way. We can still teach children how to feel safe, trusting, and comfortable with others in a more mainstream setting. 
MalloryJoy (talk) 17:23, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overall thoroughness and diagnostic criteria
Talk:Call detail record

message: This definition seems to mix two concepts. Yes, I'm sure there are _collections_ of CDRs but 'a CDR' is a Call Detail Record pertaining to a _single_ call. Look it up on Google using "define:Call Detail Record" (without the inverted commas). 
This topic is misleading and incorrect and if I can find the right button I'll report it.
Rpineger 14:53, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  topic is misleading and incorrect? 

message: I could not find any reliable legal source asserting that law enforcement in the united States requires a warrant to obtain "Call detail records". I could not find any reliable legal source asserting that  "Call detail records" are in fact protected by reasonable expectations of privacy . This section seems to be written as a personal opinion and interpretation on legal matters . Is there any reason to not delete this section?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alsamuef (talk • contribs) 21:21, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete the privacy section
Talk:List of highest church naves

message: I'm rather curious as to why some of those magnificent cathedrals have folding chairs for the congregation and not pews.
Musicwriter (talk) 14:46, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  European cathedrals 

message: I've never visited it so I don't know but according to the Basilica of Our Lady of Licheń article that church has a nave height of 98 metres! Now if that is correct this church would well boot the current record holder Beauvais Cathedral with a nave height of 43 metres (under half the height!) into second place.Is this a typing error or what. --Ormie2 (talk) 21:04, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Basilica of Our Lady of Licheń?

message: someone should look for sources..heights of some churches seem to be overstated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.12.214.220 (talk) 14:53, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources? 

message: It seems to me that both these cathedrals have higher naves than Beauvais. St. Mary's is listed at 190 feet. Why aren't they listed here? InFairness (talk) 05:16, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  St. Mary Cathedral, San Francisco, and Metropolitan Cathedral, Rio de Janeiro 

message: How is the height of the nave defined? The very highest point from the floor to the ceiling? For instance the Church of Santa Engrácia measures about 80 meters from the floor of the nave to the highest point of the dome interior. There must surely be many more churches about taller than 50 meters interior. --62.48.249.28 (talk) 23:49, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition? 

message: There are at least 3 churches which should not persist in this list. 
In the church of Hagia Sophia and in the church of Saint Sava there is not nave at all. Their plans and constructions are diffrent, different type of architecture. They have central plan and they have no nave at all. 
The nave of church of Alexander Nevsky (in Sofia) is presented with the exterior height of its nave and this is not correct at all, since the article presents the interior height of the naves and all other naves in the list are presented with their interior height. 
So, I will edit the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Puldin (talk • contribs) 23:14, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some churches should not be presented in this list
Talk:Stuart Howe

message: To avoid plastering these all over the article itself, I'm putting these improvement tags here. I sincerely hope that the article's creator (and virtually sole editor) will read the links in the tags and take the suggestions on board and also read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest for guidance (if applicable). Note also that the article is devoid of references to reliable, published sources which are independent of the subject.
 
 
It also needs clean-up and formatting of the punctuation and linking for the opera titles. Voceditenore (talk) 14:31, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: you have to place the clean up templates on the article page not in the talk seciton.  Are they still relevant?  Argolin (talk) 04:47, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvements needed
Talk:Maastricht University

message: After checking the source of the endowment figure, it looks like this resembles total revenues and not endowment of the university. If someone has more accurate endowment figures from SWOL (The university fund) it would be informative to adjust the figure. I find it hard to believe that the endowment is this large for such a young institution.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.26.54.233 (talk) 10:08, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Endowment figure? 

message: I found this article very biased - almost an advertisement. I will keep an eye out here for unsourced and biased claims.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.209.61.107 (talk) 14:19, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Let's make this a better article by using the guidelines for improvement of the WikiProject Universities. I have already added sections on history, campuses and organizational structure. The information on faculties needs improvement. Ideally, each faculty should have a separate subpage. More sections, e.g. on academic or student life at the University, are desirable. BluLex (talk) 16:02, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased? 

message: It cant be that both the Universiteit_voor_Humanistiek and the UM are the youngest. I vote that the UM has to let go of the title. 
:Universities with a theological or ‘levensbeschouwelijke’ ground are, for the ministry of OCW, not a ‘normal’ university, a different category. UM is the youngest ‘Real’ university in the Netherlands, while UvH is not a ‘real’ university 
:http://www.minocw.nl/documenten/Voorstelvanwetophethogeronderwijsenonderzoek.pdf Mach10 (talk) 21:13, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  But wikipedia is not the ministry of OCW, and WP states that a University is an institution of higher education and research, which grants academic degrees at all levels (associate, bachelor, master, and doctorate) in a variety of subjects. -- 62.178.132.236 (talk) 13:17, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: By the above definition given by you the UvH is NOT a university, since they only grand Bachelor and Master degrees in one subject, namely Humanistiek. By this definition also the UM was not a university till 1980, before 1980 only obtaining a degree in Medicine was possible Mach10 (talk) 13:40, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Because the definition is about plural, degreeS? But I assume they gave to more then one student a degree, both the UM and the UvH, so I dont agree here. If you read Dutch, the Dutch article also states that it is actually recognised as a scientific higher education institute. But I think were taking the "whos younger" question a bit too far. You wouldn't agree when i prune the UM's claim to youth? - 62.178.132.236 (talk) 00:27, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because of the plural subjects, UvH offers degrees in one subject, and that does not agree with your definition of an University. You can put it out there, I will not change it, but I cannot speak for othersMach10 (talk) 05:14, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  youngest?
Talk:Iron Rail Book Collective

message: I've removed the deletion tag assigned to this page.  I'm not sure if this is the proper protocol, but the instructions in the tag seemed to imply that is is.  The tag claimed that the library is "non-notable."  The Iron Rail is one of the largest anarchist libraries in North America (if not the largest).   There are at least a half-dozen other American infoshops with Wikipedia articles (see []).  If the Iron Rail was some flash in the pan which had just opened and was likely to close within six months, than the notability might be questioned; but the Iron Rail has been  one of the longer-lasting institutions in the New Orleans radical community.  Maybe the article could be reworked or improved; but I can't see that it should be deleted on grounds of non-notability. Praxedis G 15:04, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion discussion
Talk:John Jackson (cricketer, born 1898)

message: Just how Chilean was he? He must have been of British extraction. He may well have regarded himself as British, like many British bred people born in the formal and informal British Empire in those days. Æthelwold 20:11, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Born and died in Chile, and played for a Chilean national team makes him pretty Chilean in my book! He is almost certainly of British extraction due to his education at Oxford and his surname, which is hardly a common Chilean surname from the little I know about the country. Andrew nixon 20:44, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chiado

message: The word 'tradicional' is used at least twice in the opening paragraph, why? If that is the name given to a traditional Portuguese shopping area should it not be hyperlinked? Copywryter 18:50, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tradicional? 
Talk:Royal Dramatic Theatre

message: I made a change to some wording that seemed confusing. I'm hoping the writer will confirm. Previously in the second paragraph of the section 19th and 20th Century it showed 
system that replaced their pro cent in the theatre-income by a set salary
It looked to me as if this meant 
system that replaced their percent of the theatre income by a set salary
If I have erred, please revert.
Ed8r (talk) 16:46, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this correct? 
Talk:John Cox Stevens

message: The claim by New York Yacht Club in his bio regarding ownership of American Eclipse needs to be substantiated. The details fit the Thoroughbred Heritage description of the horse  but they do not mention Stevens. Handicapper 15:10, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello. I have a question regarding politician Millicent Fenwick and her mother, who are a descendants/members of the Stevens family of Hoboken. Her mother was Mary Picton Stevens who married congressman and later ambassador to Spain, Ogden H. Hammond in 1907. Mary was the daughter of John Stevens and Mary Marshall McGuire. Her father, John: Was he a grandson/grandnephew or anything of this John Cox Stevens? I'd just like to know the kind of relataion between these people. Is there a possibility that the full name of Mary Stevens Hammond's father was John Cox Stevens II or III or something? Does anyone know his DOB and DOD and when and where he married Mary McGuire? Did Mary Stevens Hammond have any siblings? Any information is appreciated. I wrote the German Wikipedia articles on Millicent Fenwick and Ogden Hammond and I'm collecting information regarding Mary Stevens Hammond. Thank you, mit freundlichen Grüßen OfficeBoy (talk) 18:16, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stevens Family 

message: Edwin A. Stevens had Stevens Institute of Technology created from a bequest left in his will, so how did he later go on to be a commodore at the NYCC?thegreatco (talk) 17:11, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in last line 
Talk:Eric Dill

message: This redirect is up for discussion at RfD at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 July 22. Please add the  tag to it. BigNate37(T) 15:16, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I made that change per your request and the suggestion during the RfD. Hopefully other similar redirects can use it in the future. Cool Hand Luke 23:13, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Do you have reliable sources that can satisfy WP:BIO? This is currently a redirect because previous incarnations of this article failed to establish independant notability. Cool Hand Luke 23:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

text: The consensus at the RfD was that he has no independent notability. I think that's still true; a one-entry imdb page and self-created myspace page do nothing to establish note. Feel free to ask for this redirect to be unprotected at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Current requests for unprotection. Add  and your reasoning on a new line. Cool Hand Luke 21:37, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requires admin edit 

message: Please ban user "The Blade of the Northern Lights" from continuing to redirect and harass the state of Eric Dill's Wikipedia page.
The page needs to be unlocked and reverting back to before this users meddling and obviously ill-intended "edits" of this page.
Thank you
InfoProtector7 (talk) 01:35, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Blade of the Northern Lights - continued harassment 

message: None of the above addresses the reason I redirected this, which is that it's an unsourced biography of a living person.  Therefore, it can stay a redirect until someone gets a source; however, I'm in no way convinced he meets notability guidelines.  The Blade of the Northern Lights  (話して下さい) 14:28, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. All that's needed to have an article on this guy are some reliable sources. Nataev (talk) 10:34, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note 

message: * The article has been wikified, later will go throught out the references to access and assess the reliability and sources. Justice007 (talk) 18:15, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikified
Talk:Airport (TV series)

message: @drmargi (talk)
The material is not sourced... The link points to London Heathrow's website, which is an indication in what way that the one airport in the busiest in the world either now or at the time of production? Furthermore, numerous Wikipedia articles that are sourced by Airports Council International Statistics and Data Centre point to many other airports being busier than Heathrow right now. And the way the sentence reads in the article now suggests that Heathrow is the largest right now. Lastly, even at the original time of production in 1996, according to news articles found in archives, Heathrow was not the busiest airport according to passenger count or airplane movement count and I can't find anything stating it was or still is. One example: http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1996-02-16/news/9602160278_1_busiest-airport-flights-texas-airport
Same type of thing mentioned August 2014 by another editor with only explanation for undoing change being "There are multiple ways to measure busiest airport". That could be said in regards to any airport in the world. Ilovepancakes95 (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heathrow Airport Status 

message: No mention of Steve and Russell (I think were there names), the hapless paparazzi photographers? 2A02:C7C:88A5:1000:41B:DA4C:9FF8:7A48 (talk) 16:55, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I see they are actually mentioned, but as "journalists". I'd have called them press photographers/paparazzi. David Smith9 (talk) 07:41, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contributors