Talk:YouTube/Archive 3

message: ***Request to add Tony [thewinekone] and Kevin Nalts [nalts] into ==Fame beyond YouTube== section
Proent 04:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Add to famous youtube users

message: Youtube ran considerable ads wit adbrite and they had a huge IPOD giveaway promotiont hing too.
I think it was a free ipod every day and they where big advertisers with adbrite. I remember adbrite used to send out in there emails when youtube started getting a little more popular that they did heavy advertisign with adbrite.. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by alexenderaa . I gonna like to add couple of.......my favorite  http://www.ebay.com, http://www.blogger.com, http//www.webdesigningcompany.net 08:56, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising 

message: The YouTube website has been banned in Iran, information on and about this should be included, thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.177.182.218 (talk) 04:31, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube Banned In Iran 

message: Poseidon01 21:15, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Google bought Youtube a month ago. dposse 02:15, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Google has bought them. And Youtube will continue to post copyrighted material (I have no problem with that!) and Google will take on the legal costs. The marginal benifits greatly outweigh the marginal costs.
-G —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 134.117.157.7 (talk) 19:31, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why it's bad to let people post anything 

message: The earliest date for videos I have been able to find are from user BootieChrist. April 24, 2005 is the date of the uploads. Here is a link to one of the videos: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebKlgRwnpFY
Of course the videos stink, but for historical perspective, it may be good to include a link to an early video. Can anyone find an older video? Alf rules 04:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First uploads? 

message: I just read this on page C1 of the Windsor Star (Ontario, Canada), Friday, December 22 2006, and I think it would be worth adding to the page, but because it's locked I can't. If someone with pull reads this it's probably on their website, so post it up. windsorstar.comGregor Dee 18:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: what? that was not right KanuT 04:33, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hamilton Police Used YouTube to Identify Murderer 

message: I don't know why, i was accessing you tube for 15 minutes and then was blocked again! I'll see on the TV and then I post more informations... 200.148.83.202 14:01, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind it my friend. They banned it in Turkey too. Damn we are a democracy and nobody knows what the government is trying to do. You can't reach your political goals by banning websites! I have to watch Top Gear and our digital platform doesn't contain BBC 2 so I need YouTube at least for that. Deliogul 14:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  You tube is blocked again in Brazil 

message: This is just to raise the issue again since the previous discussion was archived.  If anyone lives in San Bruno near YouTube, please take a good picture of the new headquarters if you get the chance.  I assume the trees have lost their leaves now so it should be easier.  I am too busy myself to drive into the vicinity of YouTube, find public parking on the street in the residential neighborhood half a mile away (since YouTube picked an office park with no public parking and poor mass transit access) and walk all the way into the complex to get a good shot.  Again, I strongly suspect YouTube picked its current location (the former headquarters of the Gap) specifically for privacy (which its former headquarters in the attic of the pizza parlor clearly lacked).  --Coolcaesar 07:08, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The photograph issue again 

message: Does anyone know why it's called YouTube? My little brother asked me if it was related to Senator Ted's Series of Tubes speech, and, while I know it predates that, I couldn't give him an answer and wikipedia didn't have one for me. Kingkiki217 18:26, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think tube refers to tv. Then why not YourTube I dunno. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.240.10.181 (talk) 11:04, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: YouTube was founded on the idea that its users would want to publish their own, personal videos. The intention of the title was likely to express that 'You' would be on the 'Tube.' Makes sense to me! — Zioroboco 18:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of Name 

message: there has been a GREAT deal of controversy over YouTube as a video clip sharing website.
please consider adding a section showcasing where YouTube stands and where it is going. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.173.120.92 (talk) 19:36, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  consider controversy section 

message: Does anyone know the limit to how many favorites you're allowed? I got up to 304, then I got a message saying limit reached. Now, even though I've removed loads (I'm down to 200), it still displays the message.
Should this "limit" be mentioned on the article with a link? --rjcuk 00:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Favorites allowed? 

message: Does anyone know what the policy is for deletion (assuming nothing contraversial)? Does it depend on the video's rating, number of viewings...?
80.42.192.187 22:08, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think they remain permanently.--Orthologist 14:22, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How long do videos remain available for? 

message: There needs to be mention made of the growth of the book trailer on YouTube and perhaps also some of the common synonyms such as vidlit and litvid.  There is currently a new page for this on Wikipedia named Trailer (book)
Vidlit 02:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Book Trailer category for the YouTube page 

message: Does anyone want to start this section? I may start it myself if I find the time. Svetovid 16:08, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural references to YouTube? 

message: I'm trying to find another reference to "YouTube Bug Leaks Passwords To Homepage" it's an article that describes how YouTube leaked it's users passwords to the site. This is an extremely important event in YouTube history because every user appears to be affected and the ramifications of every users password, email address and full name been leaked to the Internet is huge. I tried adding this to the Wiki but you know what it's like trying to add controversial content to a Wiki. If you find another reference to this event it would be valuable to add it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.167.111.109 (talk) 00:36, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube Bug Leaks Passwords To Homepage 

message: I got fed up with this problem because I had to use Javimoya's Video Downloader on many videos just to watch it's full content! Basically, it just downloads a portion of the video, the downloading grinds to a halt then sooner or later the whole bar fills with red colour and the player shows the two buttons that allow you to share or watch the video again. It happened to me several times that I remembered that this article had some content that addressed this issue. I think it happens when YouTube's servers are overloaded or if one's internet connection is horrible or overloaded. Reloading the page with normal/forced refresh sometimes works and sometimes doesn't. I've readded this issue to the technical limitations section, albeit with just enough info to be a "section stub". Some editting help is appreciated. --Bruin_rrss23 (talk) 15:13, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That sometimes happens to me too ∆ Algonquin 12:13, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Videos ending prematurely 

message: In October of '06 Youtube agreed to use filtering software to stop copyrighted music from appearing on Youtube. It's February of '07 and they still haven't done it. Viacom is forcing them to remove any vicaom videos from the site because of this.
:How do you know this? Have a source? dposse 16:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here are some links to articles about this:
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2007-02-02-viacom-youtube_x.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/03/technology/03tube.html?ex=1328158800&en=d8c0953ce2250931&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.167.106.33 (talk) 19:21, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Acoustic Fingerprints

message: Will the one which wrote that the video of YouTube became able to be searched in Google Video not be better?--Naohiro19(Talk Page/Contributions) 12:08, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google video 

message: Can someone please add infomation from that news article into this article? All of the details of the deal need to be in here. I tried, but i'm not sure how to write it into the article without plagiarizing. I'm not very good at putting things into my own words. Thanks. dposse 16:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  update on the google deal. 

message: "To capture a YouTube video would require a camcorder and video output, and player artifacts cannot be defeated."
This is completely wrong - as described in the article! Please correct this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.51.229.101 (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --h2g2bob 18:55, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section "Reports" 

message: There were numerous reports of users uploading clips of teachers without consent, including angry teachers.  For example, a user used hidden cam to show a teacher making a violent outburst because a student brought a cell phone, and he broke it.  When the officials found out about this, they felt violated and had to deal with this situation. Look at LATimes.com or Google, and see for yourself. —Gh87 03:06, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it. If anyone wants to use it, here's the ref.
Balsa10 23:46, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clips of teachers that went "angry" at school 

message: There isn't currently a link to any example of a third party application for downloading Youtube videos. I would've added a link, but this page is protected. A good example is youtube-dl, a cross-platform python script(program) under the MIT license. I'm not trying to advertise for them or anything, I just use it and think it's a simple, well-written program that (perhaps) more people should know about. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 160.36.119.134 (talk) 06:06, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd party application 

message: It would be interesting to include what OS and web-server software YouTube is using.  Of course Adobe Flash video format and player is used for the video itself.  DonPMitchell 19:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Software 

message: Did you know Sesame Workshop ordered YouTube to remove all clips related to old Sesame Street closings? 66.153.65.92 15:01, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sesame Street Closings 

message: I would be interested by the question : what is the technology used by youtube to serve its content? Which language/platform do they use? PHP, ASP, PYTHON, JAVA ?
Thank you. MatthieuWiki 12:47, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Web Technology used to serve pages 

message: How much data is there on the YouTube servers?--Moonlight Mile 02:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Servers/Size 

message: Should YouTube really be externally linked to youtube.com as the first word of the article? Isn't it enough that it's in the External links section -- doesn't WP:EL advise against ELs in the body of the article? --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 05:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. --Alex (talk) 03:38, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link of YouTube 

message: I am promoting this article to GA because it meets WP:WIAGA and seems to be fairly stable. Good work :) Some things that I thought might be worth working on for the push to FA:
The recent events section is broken up into too many sub-sections and interferes with the flow of the article.
The social impact section could be expanded more I feel, YouTube is referenced in popular culture all the time.
--Veesicle (Talk) (Contribs) 20:50, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA promotion 

message: Shouldn't its internet popularity be mentioned in the introductory paragraph with a little more than just 'it is popular'?  I think that the Alexa Internet Rating should be added to it.  Currently, YouTube is the fourth most popular internet site.  Obviously, this fluctuates, but it is consistently ranked in the top 10, usually even the top 5.  Shouldn't this be added, it is an interesting fact, and it adds credibility to the popularity claim.  I think that the intro is the proper place for it.  Anyone agree? By the way, the link to the statistic can be found here.  Wikipediarules2221 01:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popularity 

message: I added about this on the article because it's recent in Turkey. Ont 02:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see how that's relevant, especially since the sources used aren't in English. If it's important enough for inclusion in the article, I'm sure someone will write an English article about it. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 02:22, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I was right, wasn't I? It's received some significant attention since then-- in English. If this were a less prominent subject, then it wouldn't be true. However, since everyone and their mom uses YouTube, mainstream press are quick to pick up stories about it. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 23:11, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Violating YouTube videos againist Turkey 

message: I have many different cases in which authorities have used YouTube as part of their investigation. Would this be notable enough to be added?CityPride 07:59, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As long as it's well-written, well-referenced, and you use the proper citation templates, I think it could be a good addition to the article. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 20:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Uses by the authorities

message: I'm just wondering: is there a site similar to youtube in size and organization, but focusing specifically on music rather than video? (i.e., user-created music) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hermitage (talk • contribs) 23:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  equivalent venue for music? 

message: As everyone has probably noticed, I finally found an excuse to be in San Bruno on the weekend and got a decent photo of YouTube's new home on Cherry Avenue.  Unfortunately it was overcast at the time.  San Bruno is usually overcast and foggy, like San Francisco and the rest of the northern Peninsula.  This is why San Francisco International Airport is notorious for fog delays. --Coolcaesar 13:18, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Well, I finallly got a decent photo of YouTube HQ 

message: The BBC is now putting some of its content up on youtube, should this be mentioned? Boyinabox 20:03, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention BBC? 

message: The word "tube" is a Scottish insult, like idiot, a-hole etc. So "You Tube" is just a fantastic name for a website if you're from Scotland! I love it!
The French will have an even better laugh if YouTube starts a French outlet and name it J'entube. Cretanforever 12:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Scottish Insult

message: The band  Barenaked Ladies have many youtube celebrities in their new video for their song "sound of your voice". They include Brooke Broddack, Barats & Bereta, and geriatric1927.
This should at least get a mention on the page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.42.27.72 (talk) 20:15, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Barenaked Ladies

message: One of the most popular dubbers on youtube and is best known for creating the Yugi-Oh Abridged series, and as of March 10th 2007 has had the first two videos of his series removed for copyright infrindgement, which has infuriated many youtube users. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Speedfreak69 (talk • contribs) 05:16, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would not be notiable enough for inclusion unless ther is not trival media coverage of this. --67.68.154.176 06:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  LittleKuriboh 

message: I have added it to the infringement complaints section of the article. Look out for more information on this. 
*(Reuters) - Also on CNN, Fox News
*(AP via MSNBC)
Hello32020 14:52, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viacom sues YouTube for 1 billion dollars 

message: I have heard that YouTube is reimposing a 10 minute cap on ALL videos again, except for those of previous directors.  Has anyone else heard this? Sly 23:01, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  Here.  Previous directors, I'm not sure.  But still sucks.  Anyway, someone should update that in the article somewhere; I'm not familiar enough with the article to add it somewhere.  --MPD T / C 04:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New video limit length 

message: I don't know if anyone else has noticed this, but all the youtube subdomains/servers seem to have been named after airport-codes (e.g. chi, sjl ...). 82.10.181.252 13:28, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: lax, ash, and sjc are all IATA airport codes. chi seems to be an all-inclusive code for airports in Chicago. Does sjl represent the ICAO code? There's also sjl-casing. Maybe they just denote the city location of the servers. Anyway, this is all trivial and shouldn't belong in the article unless there's a source asserting significance. –Pomte 23:02, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subdomains named after airports 

message: Why are they taking down the music videos and things like that, we see it on tv all the time for free, so why we not see on the internet on you tube. All those people are getting free publicity so why are they complaining? Can anybody explain this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Angel,Isaac (talk • contribs) 23:34, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?

message: I tried the link in the article and ended up with downloading some random video. Can anybody confirm if this "Deleted YouTube Video Viewer" really works? There are ads on the site. I suggest removing the link in the article if it doesn't work as promised. 88.240.151.101 11:22, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Viewing deleted videos

message: In the history section there is a mention of YouTube being an angel-funded enterprise - something with is separate from venture capital - and then goes on to talk about venture capital. To me this seems contradictory. Biddlesby 11:31, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venture capital contradiction 

message: ERROR - under Technical notes; Video format ...
Current text:
The different files are stored in obscurely named subdomains, to make ripping the videos difficult.
Suggested text:
The downloaded files are usually stored in the browser cache, with obscure names, to make ripping the videos difficult. Some of those files can be re-viewed locally, from the hard-drive, by adding .FLV as the file extension, then using a media viewer with appropriate codecs installed.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.132.5.248 (talk) 20:46, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical notes .. Video format .. ERROR in content 

message: I think that Kimbo and Ryan Weiber should be added to the list, but i don't know how to do it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.170.44.145 (talk) 21:35, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Who is Kimbo and Ryan Weiber? A YouTube Junkie 01:44, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  fame beyond youtube 

message: User:Love4girls has repeatedly added back these links to the external links section: 
* http://youtubeforum[dot]yamour[dot]com/
* http://videos[dot]yamour[dot]com/online_video_downloader.php
These don't seem relevant or notable to me.  The "forum" only has a few non-spam posts, and the "video downloader" doesn't seem to actually offer anything. I've removed these once already and they've been added back again under the guise of "reverting spam".  Do other people agree with me?  fraggle 15:53, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  yamour links 

message: I don't disagree that Youtube is owned by Google, which is an "American" company in as much as it has its headquarters in America.  However, I don't think it really adds anything to the article to say "Youtube is a popular American video sharing site" rather than just "Youtube is a popular video sharing site".  For an Internet website, the place where the company is located seems rather irrelevant.  This just seems like an attempt to force an American patriotic point of view on the article.  In any case, the details about where the company is based are provided in the second sentence of the article.
I'd also say that for a "social" site like Youtube where the user base is important, the nationality of the users who use the site would determine the "label" of nationality that we apply to it.  Saying "Youtube is an American site" implies that it is only targeted at Americans, which is not the case:
:Founded in February 2005, YouTube is the leader in online video, and the premier destination to watch and share original videos worldwide through a Web experience.
As you can see, Youtube's website explicitly states that it is targeted at users worldwide and not just Americans.  To claim that it is an "American" site is to imply that it is targeted only at Americans, which is not true.  It is also true that there are thousands of users of the site in other countries outside America.  In conclusion, Youtube is not an "American" site in as much as being targeted as a site solely for Americans, as this is not true. fraggle 16:34, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Youtube an "American" site 

message: This article only lists Firefox extensions and downloadable programs for downloading videos from Youtube. What about this: 1. That's online, and there are many other online youtube video downloaders of which I think at least one of them should be listed in this article. Slartibartfast1992 01:40, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Downloading videos from Youtube 

message: I have found an article about youtube marketing here:
http://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.cgi?C=456008
Do you think this article's link should be placed in the youtube wikipedia entry under the 'further reading' section?
Daabomb 00:10, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Youtube marketing 

message: The New York Times devoted an entire article to defining the term, and other sources frequently use term in the absence of one better.  
A cursory search on YouTube finds substantial use.  Despite its prevalence outside of Wikipedia, however, Wiki-readers tend to get confused without a firm sense of what the term means. See Talk:Caitlin Hill I renamed the section so that all instances of "YouTube celebrity" on Wikipedia can have somewhere to link.  Ichormosquito 08:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I gave back section its old name for now but kept citations for "YouTube celebrities".  Should I rename the section? Ichormosquito 08:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "YouTube celebrities" 

message: It should be added to the article that the United States Military Academy at West Point banned Youtube in the US ban section.
BaronGuard 20:24, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Got a reliable source?  --ElKevbo 20:28, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  West Point bans Youtube 

message: it should also be added in the australian section that any australian school that has its own network and the capability to block sites will always block you tube foremost. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.27.231.250 (talk) 05:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We'd need a source, do you have one?  Regards, Ben Aveling 08:06, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  australian ban 

message: I am not sure i understand "youtube fame". when will this list ever end. what is fame "after" youtube. i think this is a completely ridiculous and bias idea of fame BEYOND youtube. anyway, please discuss. maybe i missed something. but to me the only famous youtubers would be maybe LG15 and renetto. but this un-ending list of people is a tad disturbing TomSkillingJr.
:YouTubers who meet the qualifications put forward by Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines, especially WP:NOTE, WP:BIO, and WP:WEB, all deserve mentions. Ichormosquito 04:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  YOUTUBE FAME GAME 

message: 82.46.12.148 23:10, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most subscirbed user 

message: I heard Youtube is going to start displaying advertisements in certain videos before they play. Anyone heard news on this? It's not in the article. Pizzachicken 06:07, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Check under YouTube celebrities.  YouTube now places advertisements adjacent to videos posted by certain well-established users.  As of yet, no one has made public exactly how much revenue YouTube shares.   Ichormosquito 04:30, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising in videos? 

message: Both of these videos by Tuğba Özay's Garanti Arkadaş service has been watched more than 24 million views. OnurTcontribs 22:28, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Videos of Garanti Arkadaş 

message: Has had over 10 million viewings (over 15m actually) as
*Charlie The Unicorn
*Charlie : Candy Mountain
and various other names.
Also on rapidshare and newsgrounds (over 1m views) as well as filmcow. Rich Farmbrough, 10:52 7 May 2007 (GMT).
:I don't think there's a way to mention it, unfortunately.  Ichormosquito 04:20, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Charlie the unicorn

message: somebody should update this section looks smosch is the most viewed video right now. 10:35, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  most popular videos 

message: Subsection has reliable source, and that so many notable Tubers regularly meet up should get a mention.  Also: its 8 organizers are YouTubers in the over 10,000 subscription range. Ichormosquito 05:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Ichormosquito 07:36, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "As One" YouTube gatherings

message: (Chain messages post)
i dont know why people think "ur mom will die" in "4 hrs" if "you do not post this message" "20 times"
however, its annoying enough (and persistent enough) to warrant as a fad in Youtube.
goddamn chain messages ruin everything. if i wanted to read that sort of shit, id go to the conspiracytube site.
69.251.13.209 03:28, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That message is actually illegal (a Type of death threat).----User:Rock2e  Talk - Contribs  19:39, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silly chainletter comments 

message: I think this article should be updated regarding YouTube resolving to a page stating that the service is unavailable. Lcarsdata 18:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ignore this. Lcarsdata 18:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube offline 

message: i found this site and it is a shameless ripoff of youtube. ∆ Algonquin 08:13, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Motiono]] 

message: Should something be mentioned about the sudden increase in YouTube spam? I've been spammed twice so far. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.67.36.230 (talk) 23:19, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You'd need a source.  Ichormosquito 04:11, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

text: You need to wait until the news media reports it.  A "screenie" would constitute original research, a Wikipedia no-no. Ichormosquito 04:03, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube spam 

message: I find youtube cool as a web 2.0 application —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.12.95.12 (talk) 10:07, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Youtube is cool