lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:South Pasadena High School

message: This page is locked, but I would like to suggest a few changes: Egor Orlov and David Allen are not notable alumni, please remove them. There are some others on there that are un-sourced and worth removing as well. Also, the fact that "100 Years" was voted for "overwhelmingly" is simply not true, as well as lacking source. In fact, another song won, but the students in charge wanted that song instead so it was chosen. This whole page is a mess and filled with information that has no source, I hope someone with the power can make the changes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.33.238.186 (talk) 10:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

message: This article is one of a  number selected for the early stage of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue   are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.
The following request appears on that page:
Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Pending changes"  would be appreciated.
Please update the Queue page as appropriate.
Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially
Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 00:06, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pending changes
Talk:South San Francisco High School

message: Non-notable, unverifiable, off-topic... The whole Athletic section should be deleted unless a quality non-primary source can substantiate the claims & names. Zedla 07:14, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Athletics
Talk:Irish Son

message: To me, this entire article seems unencyclopedic, and more like an advertisement for both the artist and the album. Though personally, I don't think that the article should be nominated for deletion, for I believe if it was cleaned up a little it could be a useful article.
I would clean this page up myself, but I have neither the resources nor time and am not familiar with the subject of the article.
Things like, "His enthusiasm for the music is infectious and invigorating. Unencumbered by the past, Brian talks about the single and album with all the energy and excitement of someone making their first record," just don't seem to belong in the encyclopedia to me.
Are there any thoughts? Would someone who is more familiar with the album be willing to make this sound less like an advertisement page? --Evening Breeze 08:08, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Dreadful advertising puffery. I'll delete it and reduce to a stub description. DWaterson 22:36, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion?

message: I have removed the above category from this page because there is nothing in the text which even remotely address any religious issues, let alone specifically Catholic ones. If text to substantiate the claim is added later, please feel free to restore the category. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 23:33, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Anti-Catholicism]] 
Talk:Southampton Shoal Light

message: The nautical charts show Southhampton (double h) as the spelling for this location. --Kevin Murray (talk) 21:40, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The US Gazetteer and almost every other reference gives "Southampton Shoal" with a single 'h' and no plural. see . I see that nautical charts use a double 'h', but almost nothing else follows this spelling. It seems that it would be better to rename the article to Southampton Shoal Light with a redirect from the double 'h' spelling and a mention of this alternative spelling in the article. Are there any objections if I proceed with this approach? Rupert Clayton (talk) 16:16, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Southhampton or Southampton
Talk:Boys Like Girls (album)

message: I have accidentally deleted the genres section of the info box in the article and do not know how to restore it. I apologize for the inconvenience. Ded Meem (talk) 00:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  help
Talk:Southern California Bight

message: A bight is an oceanographic feature. There are no human inhabitants of a bight. This entry seems to be about Southern California indigenous cultures, not about the bight. These cultures certainly used and depended on the resources of the bight, but it shouldn't be the sole emphasis of the entry.
207.172.129.17 13:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This entry doesn't make sense. 
Talk:Southern California Fusion

message: If there's going to be a wiki link to Aviara park, someone should actually create the page. In fact, all the names of those players are in red, which means there's no wiki page for them either. And I don't beleive each of them would pass the notability requirement to have wiki pages on them. I suggest that Aviara park and each of the players names should be written in plain text, without the wiki brackets, until those pages can be created. Seeing lots of red letters makes the article look incomplete. --Eric Bekins 03:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed on the players and I will remove the redlinks per concensus at WP:Football. Jogurney 14:13, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aviara park and wiki pages 
Talk:Southern California Institute of Architecture

message: Is there any objections if I add the name of the founders Morphosis (Thom Mayne and Michael Rotondi) and Ray Kappe? 128.97.84.173 (talk) 19:52, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  School's founders 

message: I removed two people who attended SCI-Arc but did not receive academic degrees from the school (one of them received an honorary degree).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serop2 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alumni List Edited
Talk:Southwestern College (California)

message: What organization accredits this school?   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.7.247.217 (talk) 05:39, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accreditation 

message: Since I am enrolled in this institution for continuing education credits I have noticed that a large majority of the student body are ESL students, and a noticable percentage of the vehicles in the ever expanding parking lot have Baja California Plates.  Should this not be noted in the article? 207.114.206.48 (talk) 07:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  High Percentage of Cross Border Students
Talk:Spahn Ranch

message: also mentioned in the The Frighteners (1996) at 1:26:13 in the movie.  Crazy fbi agent mentions it in reference to why he is so insane.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.135.185.48 (talk) 22:05, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: EDIT REQUEST
Photos linked to this article clearly show the name of the ranch as: "SPAHN'S MOVIE RANCH."
The article needs to be corrected to read "Spahn Ranch, also known as the Spahn's Movie Ranch,"  Ammobox (talk) 16:00, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ranch name 

message: The push-pin map for this article has the push-pin for Spahn Ranch placed way over in Ventura County, when obviously it should be somewhere in the northwest corner of Los Angeles County. I don't have the foggiest notion how to move the push-pin myself, or I'd just do it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Petronius2 (talk • contribs) 02:18, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Push-Pin Map 

message: The bit about Mansonette sexual favors rendered to keep the old boy happy and cooperative, noted in vague form last December (not by me) and then quickly deleted as unsourced, is, IIRC, to be found in Ed Sanders' book. My copy is well-entombed and inaccessible. 66.249.172.66 (talk) 10:14, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sex
Talk:Vivien Greene

message: Added many sourced references about her marriage to Graham Greene. Also broke article into sections make it more readable and also make editing more logical. 172.56.11.222 (talk) 06:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Added Sections

message: Nothing from the Daily Mail should be considered accurate and therefore usable as source material for anything. I am deleting the paragraph(s) cited.184.145.94.107 (talk) 19:43, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now removed much of it.  Gnome de plume (talk) 20:14, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scurrilous article shouldn't be used!
Talk:Spaulding Square, Los Angeles

message: move to Spaulding Square, Los Angeles. --RegentsPark (talk) 16:27, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Spaulding Square → Spaulding Square, Los Angeles, California  Spaulding Square, Los Angeles
* Neighborhood naming convention mandates inclusion of city name. Purplebackpack89 (Notes Taken) (Locker) 20:01, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Yakovlev Yak-44

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Nigel Ish (talk) 20:56, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Source of the suspect text was Gunston, Bill. Yakovlev Aircraft since 1924. London, UK: Putnam Aeronautical Books, 1997. .Nigel Ish (talk) 20:58, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Spreckels Organ Pavilion

message: This makes no sense at all. The Spreckels Organ Pavilion is in San Diego, CA. The Spreckels Organ (I guess) is in San Fransisco, CA. They are over 400 miles apart. About the only thing they share is a similarly sounding name. Why does this article say that the organ is on display in San Fransisco? That's like saying that the White House is on display in Boston. These are no mere pianos! Please unf*ck this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.8.220.125 (talk) 03:54, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are two different "Spreckels" organs. This one is an outdoor organ in San Diego, the other is in San Francisco. They are not the same, so please don't re-merge them or undo the revert. Sorry if I seem strident, it's just that the pages are so obviously about different organs and yet they were merged and remained that way for well over a month. Geoff Canyon 05:53, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was this merged? 

message: At 5,640 pipes, the Massey Organ in the amphitheater at Chautauqua, NY, is the world's largest. Please correct this misstatement.Wrstewart (talk) 04:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected. Remember that anyone can correct errors in articles, see here for help in editing. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 22:40, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is not the largest outdoor pipe organ
Talk:Spreckels, California

message: Spreckels is not in the CA 20th Congressional District; it's the 18th Congressional District. Zoe Lofgren, not Kevin McCarthy (of all people). https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/CA/18 Coyote6 (talk) 21:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong congressional rep
Talk:Polled livestock

message: Complete list (I started it, but I'm not even sure what breeds are naturally polled since many of them don't say)
Find some history on polled cattle
List advantages and disadvantages
Cite Sources (always the most important one)
Dukemeiser 17:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To do (2006)

message: can this article be moved to polled gene as a section, /*cattle*/, and similar section created for sheep?
I don't really think there is sufficient material for two articles.
The article Poll Merino has a good discussion of the poll gene (espec. as relates to merinos)
Garrie 02:40, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polled gene is a redirect 

message: "Polled" means without horns, naturally or not.  A polled animal may have had its horns cut off, may have been disbudded (the horn buds burnt out when young) or it may be naturally polled.  The term "naturally polled" is only needed because it is one of several kinds of polling.  The definition and article title are therefore inaccurate.
I've removed breeds from the list which are not normally polled naturally.
I think there is probably a need for the following articles:
*Polling gene, covering cattle, sheep, goats and any others in which it occurs or may occur (Polled gene is currently a redirect back to Polled cattle).
*Polling (animal husbandry), covering methods of removing horns or preventing their growth.
*List of naturally polled cattle breeds – the nearest to what this article is at the moment.
A similar list for sheep breeds might well be too complex, because it would have to cover all the various arrangements – polled in male and female, in female only, in neither, or with multiple horn pairs.  It would be better to cover it in List of sheep breeds  --Richard New Forest (talk) 18:40, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition and title

message: These articles should not be merged, the content is extremely different.  They both could stand expansion, but the difference is almost like comparing apples to "road apples"  LOL!  The poll on an animal is, depending on who you talk to, either the poll joint between the occipital crest and C1, or another name for the occipital area itself.  Polled livestock are animals that normally could have horns but don't.  Horses, for example, have a poll, and it is very important in riding, but they cannot nor never could be polled livestock!  Montanabw(talk) 07:50, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Poll (livestock) versus Polled livestock
Talk:Tax revenue

message: This hasn't been edited in over a year, and it's a pretty important topic.  This needs attention. Silvdraggoj 01:15, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would like to see figures, charts, and statistics. Phaldo 17:14, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lots of work needed

message: I've added a few citations, not entirely positive (I cant find any actual credible economists that believe in the laffer curve, outside of the austrian crank set) to the article. To be honest, the whole laffer curve section should probably be deleted. The concept is borderline pseudoscience. 59.167.111.154 (talk) 14:42, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laffo curve
Talk:Springville, California

message: There is/was another Springville located in Ventura County, California. Located in the area of Artisian Well, it thrived in the later half of the 1800's until the US Government purchased most of the land to build the Oxnard Air Force during the 1940's.  The base closed around 1970. Camarillo Airport now occupies the multi use property and shares the large facility with many local government training facilities such as the Ventura County Fire and Sheriff's Department.  
The only standing structure leftover from this Springville is the Springville Grammer School built in 1887.  It's replacement one room schoolhouse, built in 1930, is a Spanish style adobe and has been converted to the 'Springville Winery'.  It stands at the corner of Pleasant Valley Road and Wood Road, just a strawberry field away from the Camarillo Airport.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.118.141.33 (talk) 22:28, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Sproul Plaza

message: It might be helpful to add what is the proper pronunciation for "Sproul" on here. I have heard the "ou" pronounced both as "oo" (uː) as in "spool", as well as "ow" (aʊ) as in "scowl". And the UCLA Sproul Hall section lists the latter pronunciation. I want to know which is correct for Berkeley. --164.67.235.98 (talk) 08:00, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation? 

message: I don't know if the Occupy protests merit either a mention here or an article to themselves, though they are certainly newsworthy, at least at the present time. 66.234.204.13 (talk) 07:06, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Occupy Berkeley protests 

message: Prior to my edits today, this article had read that Emmy Lou Packard and her ex-husband Byron Randall, together had built the bas-relief mural together however it was not cited. I found a cited source that did not mention Byron Randall working on the mural at all. I updated the article and added citation today to reflect what I discovered in the source I found. If you can find something that disagrees with my findings and named Byron Randall please feel free to update the article and write on this talk page. Thank you. Jooojay (talk) 09:37, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Bas-relief mural in Lower Sproul

message: The live cam link at the bottom of the page in external links to a page on Berkeley's sight stating "Page not found
Whoops!
The URL you are seeking was not found. The file may no longer exist or you might have typed the URL incorrectly." 173.66.69.186 (talk) 20:51, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Live Cam Page Not Found

message: — Assignment last updated by Zr-gpp-1 (talk) 04:00, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Global Poverty and Practice
Talk:Tupolev Tu-95LAL

message: From the article's description section:
Although some Western intelligence agencies claimed that the Tu-119 was successfully tested, once more reliable information was available, it was discovered that the Tu-119 was only tested and never put into serial production.
This is rather confusing and I suspect the author really means that the Tu-95LAL was successfully tested. It would then logically follow that based on the Tu-95LAL testing program, plans for the construction of the Tu-119 (or even some other designation) were made but they have never progressed beyond the drawing board.
It would appear that the Tu-95LAL testing program was successful in that it proved that the concept of a flying nuclear reactor was indeed possible or at least feasable enough to begin planning for the Tu-119.
See: www.tespilot.ru
I'll try and incorporate some of this soon (the translation is difficult to follow...), unless there's any objections of course. --RdeVjun (talk) 02:47, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Description section is confusing

message: Someone has confused the Tu-95LAL with the Tu-119.
The Tu-95 LAL is the aircraft described in the article.
The Tu-119 was to have been the next step with two nuclear powered engines inboard, but the programme was cancelled before the Tu-119 was completed. Can we have the article written to reflect this or better yet, re-name it to the name of the aircraft described!Petebutt (talk) 07:22, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion 

message: I find the movie source heavily dubious. Discovery Channel is known to be hugely biased against Soviet tech, and furthermore, I couldn't find any info about reactor shielding being inefficient in Russian sources. There weren't even rumors of a cover-up. In fact, even the most Western sources cited in the article say that the shielding was efficient. Khathi (talk) 10:04, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Shielding efficiency

message: Article currently reads in part The main purpose of the flight phase was examining the effectiveness of the radiation shielding, which was one of the main concerns for the engineers. Liquid sodium, beryllium oxide, cadmium, paraffin wax and steel plates were used for protection. (my emphasis)
That's a rather strange claim. Liquid sodium is virtually transparent to neutrons, and not quite as dense as water, so its shielding of gamma is not good either. And those two are the main hazards. Alpha will bounce off a sheet of paper, beta is a little more penetrating but still not a problem. The source given for this particular claim is not online, but if it really says that I question its reliability. Andrewa (talk) 01:47, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: And sodium
Talk:SS Jeremiah O'Brien

message: This article has consisted mostly of the text from http://www.ssjeremiahobrien.org/welcome.html since 2004, without assertion of permission. I've removed it as a copyright violation. If you want to re-add it, please make sure it fits our copyright policy and an appropriate permission is given from the rights holder. Sandstein 22:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violations removed 

message: There is claim in article that Jeremiah is one of just 2 surviving Liberty ships.  What about SS Lane Victory.  It is just a few rows after SS Jeremiah O'Brien in List of National Historic Landmarks in California.  It states it is a WWII "Victory" ship (they meant Liberty ship?).  Jeremiah is then one of at least 3 surviving.  Who knows how many more will pop up. doncram 21:37, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Victory ships are not the same as Liberty ships.Fl295 23:45, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim regarding one of just 2 surviving Liberty ships

message: These can also be seen on :File:Jeremiah O'Brien (Liberty ship, San Francisco).JPG, at full resolution. Here's the full story, from the photographer: "This is at the bow of the ship starboard side. You can see it in the other wikipedia photo. In fact, that photo shows two of them. I forgot about the one on the port side.
If I remember correctly, the docent said that she was painted on their maiden voyage to France and then painted back over before they landed. People forgot about it until 50+ years later when they were restoring the ship and found her as they chipped away the old paint. I forget, but I think the thong is a modern addition."
Pretty amusing story. Cool that the restorers brought them back to light.  Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 02:27, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  S.S. Jeremiah O'Brien pinups 

message: I created the gallery and put a few of the pictures I took in it, and integrated some others. Others are located here, if anyone wants to sort through and include them: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1832211/ss%20o%27brien/index.html - there are some great engine room shots, among others. Earthpig (talk) 23:06, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Gallery

message: Couldnt change the wrong numbers:
5 inch are 5 x 2,54 cm = 127 mm
3 inch are 3 x 2,54 cm = 76,2 mm
--79.211.145.61 (talk) 17:21, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info-Box Armament 
Talk:SS Lane Victory

message: This boat also has a twin 40mm, as I noticed in person last week. I dont know if they put it on there for show, or what, but the specs dont show it to be on there.????.?? --Kvuo (talk) 04:19, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: guns

message: This article states: "The engine housed in the Lane Victory's cargo hold was used as the engine for the USS San Pablo in The Sand Pebbles (film)." Well, yes, the engine used in that movie is currently housed in the hold of Lane Victory, but that's only because someone moved it there to be part of the ship's museum long after the fact. Thus, it really isn't an example of this ship being used in a Hollywood production as the heading in the article would suggest. Now, Lane Victory has herself been used as a prop in many a TV show, commercial, etc. which oddly enough isn't really mentioned.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.61.140 (talk) 19:54, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Usage in Hollywood