lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mikyö Dorje, 8th Karmapa Lama

message: This article Tsultrim Allione says, Mikyo Dorje, the 8. Karmapa, had a brother whose seventh incarnation is still alive.
Is the name of that brother known?
:Austerlitz -- 88.72.26.231 (talk) 14:09, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Relationship/relatives

message: The Mandala of the Sun (Dültika Nyima'i Kyil Khor) by the VIII Karmapa, Mikyö Dorje
Ocean of Miracles (ngo mtshar gyi rgya mtsho), Biography of Bodong Chogle Namgyal (1376-1451) This title is retrieved from Diemberger's book.
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.81.137 (talk) 19:54, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Austerlitz -- 88.75.81.137 (talk) 19:59, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

text: -- 88.75.92.117 (talk) 09:02, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: His texts

message: *
:Austerlitz -- 88.72.29.147 (talk) 11:27, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: -- 88.72.29.147 (talk) 11:42, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: His life

message: Is there an explanation to those Yeshes of different colors?
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.82.71 (talk) 19:55, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Thangka

message: *Diamond Way Meditation Practices
At the bottom of the site it is said:
"Eighth Karmapa Meditation
Eighth Karmapa Meditation This is a 'Meditation on the Lama' also known as 'The Guru Yoga in Four Sessions (Tib. Tun Shi Lame Naljor), this practice was composed by the Eighth Karmapa Michoe Dorje. It is used after having completed the Four Foundational Practices."
*
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.210.141 (talk) 14:44, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Meditation Practices
Talk:Mori Nagayoshi

message: A tag has been placed on :Mori Nagayoshi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://prabook.com/web/mobile/#!profile/2086531. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here. 
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.   JaneciaTaylor (talk) 20:19, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Mori Nagayoshi]]
Talk:Barry Streek

message: I am still in the middle of working on this article so please be gentle on the criticism.  Please let me know if there is any thing that I should add or rewrite.  I am still planning to add a couple of pictures and greatly increase the content on this article.  I also plan to use more references, I have so many at the moment I hardly know where to start. Thanks, --Discott 20:52, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of presenters of the Academy Award for Best Picture

message: Some of the names on the list are identified as the presenters for the completely wrong ceremonies. For example, John Wayne is listed as presenter for the 52nd ceremony. He actually presented the award for 1979's 51st ceremony, and he died in 1979. Just calling attention to some facts before I consider re-formatting it.24.99.207.243 20:53, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The John Wayne error has apparently been corrected.  John Wayne is currently listed as the Best Picture presenter at the 51st Academy Awards ceremony held on April 9, 1979, which honored films of 1978.   (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 02:36, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors in article 

message: I don't think Horowitz should be listed... I mean, he announced the winner, but he wasn't an official presenter. 2605:A000:4C86:AA00:D91F:123D:59BC:F8BB (talk) 02:50, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Jordan Horowitz
Talk:Nicholas Grimald

message: A team of college students that I am a part of will be editing and adding references to this page this coming week, Oct. 20-25, 2013. The research that we have done is thorough and backed by legitimate sources. We believe that Grimald deserves a page that highlights his work and the contributions that he has done. With all new information that will added, we will insert our sources and the references we used to complete the page. If you have any questions feel free to contact me, or our Professor at SUNY New Paltz, username: Redcknight. --Canarycage (talk) 16:46, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Substantial Changes
Talk:Nicolaus Olahus

message: as i have said this is english wikipedia. if hungarian names are used within the article instead of enlish names this will only confuse readers. if you want to have all hungarian names there is a place called hungarian wikipedia. there you can use whatever names you want. while you edit on english wikipedia you shall repsect the comunity guidelines and use only the internationally accepted place-names and the english correspondent when naming people, if that is the case and if the respective person is not internationally known by another name other than the english version.79.113.44.169 (talk) 13:25, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  hungarian names 

message: The English-language source where the text is taken from, Catholic Encyclopedia (1913), uses the form Georg Szatmáry 79.117.165.88 (talk) 18:32, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Georg Szatmáry'' vs ''György Szatmáry''
Talk:Ninan Cuyochi

message: Born 149, died 1500s? So he lived over 1000 years? Something's wrong here... 68.238.252.98  —Preceding comment was added at 18:33, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: NC is said to be an "infant" when chosen as HC's successor, yet the same entry claims he was in his 30s. I find no precedent for an infantruler in the Incas list, by the way, and I feel it would be impossible given the Incas' policy of having hundreds of children and basically letting the strongest claim the crown.--Menah the Great (talk) 06:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflicting data
Talk:Nishina Morinobu

message: I had been pressing for the removal of the "Takeda Nobumori" page because the story told there was in clear contracdiction with the confirmed whereabouts of Shingen's fourth son and successor, Takeda Katsuyori (武田 勝頼).  As I trace the anecdote cited there about the Takeda commander cutting off the nose and ears of the monk sent by the Oda commander, I found that the story was actually about Nishina Morinobu (仁科 盛信), Shingen's fifth son and the commander of Takatoo Castle (高遠城).
In sum, the mistakes in the original version of the said page include:
* Incorrectly records the name of "Morinobu" (盛信) as "Nobumori" (信守), hence confusing him with irrelavent historical figures bearing the same name;
* States that Morinobu was the fourth son of Shingen -- in fact, the fourth son was Katsuyori, and Morinobu was the fifth son of Shingen;
* States that Morinobu became the ruler of the Takeda clan "following the death of Katsuyori" -- in fact, Morinobu never had a chance to "rule" the Takeda clan because he himself died in advance of Katsuyori, and the designated successor of Katsuyori was his son, Nobukatsu (信勝);
* There was no such a place as "the Shinano castle" -- the castle Morinobu fortified himself in was Takatoo Castle (高遠城) in southern Shinano;
* It was Oda Nobutada (織田 信忠), the designated successor of Nobunaga (信長) and commander of the Oda forces, who send the monks, not Nobunaga himself.
Hence, I propose to merge the "Takeda Nobumori" page into the current page.Fuenping (talk) 20:56, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with the misguided "Takeda Nobumori" page
Talk:Oda Nobuyuki

message: When you say the castle was "reduced", do you mean "conquered" or "destroyed"?114.161.229.100 (talk) 06:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Suemori Castle

message: While later accounts list this person as "Oda Nobuyuki" (織田信行), documents issued by him are never signed that way. The names "Nobukatsu" (信勝) shows up in period, as well as the name Nobunari (信成) and Tatsunari(達成). It looks like the name used by scholars now is Nobukatsu (for example, Ikegami Hiroko in her recent (2012) biography of Oda Nobunaga).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.204.26.157 (talk) 07:04, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Nobuyuki" probably isn't his real name
Talk:Yogini

message: *History of Nepal Von Wright Daniel, Daniel Wright
Quotation:
"There were the four Joginis. Mani Jogini, who appeared for Raja Manichur; Bajra Jogini, who appeared for Aryacharya; Bidyadhari Jogini, who appeared for Apjasi Pandit; and lastly Hingu Jogini.
footnote 5: Mani Jogini's shrine is at Sankhu; Bajra Jogini's at Sankhu and at Phurphing; Bidyadhari Jogini's below Swayambhu; and Hingu Jogini's south of Thapatali and also west of Patan."
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.69.84 (talk) 13:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Austerlitz -- 88.75.69.84 (talk) 13:36, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

text: Austerlitz -- 88.75.198.144 (talk) 15:59, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional stories and legends

message: It appears that all of the quotes are from American women, none from people in Asia. This leads one to question the statistic cited in paragraph 2 of the lead: "the vast majority of modern practitioners are female". Does this claim refer to the vast majority of AMERICAN practitioners?
It is salutary that Hindu temples in India are mentioned, but the geographic range of this token reference to Asia is limited. Nothing about Hinduism in SE Asia (Angkor Wat, Prambanan, Bali) nor about Tantric Buddhism in Sumatra (Srivijaya Kingdom).
The ideal of equality and complementarity set out in the first paragraph of the article soon fades into American feminism POV. But a larger problem is that the article is presented as something distant and abstract, full of technical terms about magical powers. How about some excerpts from actual lives of yoginis in order to balance the theory with descriptions of practical accomplishments? Martindo (talk) 23:28, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural Bias and POV 

message: The quotes cited here sound inspirational or political but hardly shed light on WHAT a yogini can accomplish. I'd like to see this section reoriented as "Modern Examples of Yogini" or "20th Century American Yogini" or something along those lines.
Instead of quotes (such as the Baker one, which is lifted from her own WP page verbatim), we would show readers what yoginis have actually accomplished. Talk is fine, but a WP page that endeavors to explain a very old and essential mystical role for women should provide concrete examples.
The WP page on plastic shaman is recommended reading to help us avoid an excess of New Age jargon and too much celebration of eclectic approaches. In particular, shamanism, alchemy, and other related topics should be differentiated rather than lumped together as background. This might be accomplished more clearly by extracting that info from "Past and Present Contexts" and putting it into a new section titled something like "Other Types of Wisdom Women". Martindo (talk) 23:29, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganizing sections
Talk:Charles of Mount Argus

message: This article, in common with most articles included ín the WikipediaProject "Sts" reports miracles uncritically and without providing links to allow the reader to form their own opinion on the merits of the extraordinary claims made in it.
As it is currently written it belongs in a devotional pamphlet and not in an encyclopedia.  I have made some small improvements to the text (see history), but what it really needs is either a thorough re-writing or a set of links backing the original writer's texts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaimehy (talk) 14:11, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is not objective. 
Talk:Olympia Fulvia Morata

message: Why is her name spelt 'Olympia' with a y, when the original is Olimpia? If no-one can explain in a reasonable time I'll change all occurrences to the orignal spelling. Safebreaker (talk) 22:46, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The letter "y" was pronounced the same as a short "i" in post-classical Latin. Both versions would have been correct during her lifetime, before spellings were standardized in modern languages. French secondary sources seem to prefer "Olympia," Italian ones "Olimpia," but I've seen it either way in English. It would probably be useful to add a note about this in the article lead. ~~~~ Mockingdove (talk) 22:02, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling
Talk:Orchard Square

message: The term "shopping centre" doesn't seem to apply here. (The Wiki-link indicated itself describes the term as "A shopping mall (or simply mall), shopping center, or shopping arcade is a building or set of buildings that contain stores, with interconnecting walkways enabling visitors to easily walk from store to store. The walkways may be enclosed"). An earlier edit to precinct (as used in the analogous fargate article) was reverted. Any other suggestions? cheers,  Wikityke 21:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Paolo Giordano I Orsini

message: I have restored my edit of 16 March 2013 because I think it is important that Elisabeta Mori's view, that Orsini did not murder his wife, should be reflected. I think my additions were supressed under the pretext that "alleged" was the wrong word. I have changed this to "widely believed". Fair is fair, eh? 92.138.42.37 (talk) 11:39, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Paul de Foix

message: The Gallia christiana reference is useless.  And in any case, it, and the other 'references' are actually Bibliography.  It leads to no information about Paul de Foix.  Better to point to the appropriate volume at books.google.com.  That would be Volume XIII (Paris 1785), 58-59.
Vicedomino (talk) 07:12, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference
Talk:Samuel Peploe

message: Would someone be so kind as to include the pronunciation of his surname for people who don't know? DBlomgren (talk) 10:16, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Since A) insanity is doing the same thing and expecting different results and B) Wiki editors love to correct mistakes, I decided to make up a pronunciation and see if it gets corrected. If it doesn't, now we all know how to pronounce "Peploe". DBlomgren (talk) 20:28, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation of "Peploe" 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Samuel Peploe - Still life- apples and jar - Google Art Project.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on October 16, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-10-16. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:35, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Samuel Peploe - Still life- apples and jar - Google Art Project.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 
Talk:ACES Educational Center for the Arts

message: Why are most of the famous alumni just random people adding themselves.
hee hee! i'm in the visual arts department! it rocks!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.2.193.162 (talk) 00:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Pedro Damiano

message: There is no white king in the mate in 5 diagram. Is that correct? Peter Ballard (talk) 07:06, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No king?! 

message: Chaturanga is a Sanskrit word - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaturanga  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.87.1.167 (talk) 08:06, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That aligns with what I've heard as well, though I'm not an expert on the subject. I wanted to add that this wording in the intro is confusing: "In this book Damiano suggested chess was invented by Xerxes which would be the reason why it was known in Portuguese as Xadrez and in Spanish as Ajedrez. In fact, these words come from old Persian chaturanga via Arabic xaţrandj." Does this sentence mean that Damiano believed the etymology was due to Xerxes' name, but that he was mistaken? In any case, the Persian-vs-Sanskrit question above should also be resolved. Attention from an expert would be helpful here :). Proxyma (talk) 02:30, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

text: On further investigation, the History of Chess article is somewhat confusing on this point too. It says "The precursors of chess originated in India during the Gupta Empire, where its early form in the 6th century was known as chaturaṅga." However it's unclear if it "was known" by the name in India or Persia. Proxyma (talk) 02:38, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: Shouldn't there be an English translation for Damiano title? Maybe someone who speaks Portugues can do it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samwri (talk • contribs) 22:10, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of the Book's Title
Talk:I Am Spoonbender

message: It's a rough sketch at the moment.
Notability per WP:MUSIC:
# It has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable.
## Punk news
## Chart Music Magazine
## Uri Geller swears by them
## Discorder mag
## Pop Matters
# Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable).
## Mint Records and others
# Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable; note that it is often most appropriate to use redirects in place of articles on side projects, early bands and such.
## Pansy Division and Thought Industry - Duncan
## cub (band) - Robynn
-- Xinit 21:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Peter Vischer the Elder

message: Unreferenced; contains uncited opinions; and contains such confusing prose as "The general form of the shrine is Gothic, 1 but the details are those of the 16th-century Italian Renaissance treated 1". At least part of this may be a cut-and-paste job. - Jmabel | Talk 23:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A bit of a mess 

message: How we got to where we are. Originally, it was less than a stub.  Then the two Vischer stubs were combined to create a Vischer Family of Nuremberg page and greatly expanded and referenced.  Then the Peter Vischer the Elder portion was pulled out into separate article without references by someone else.  I just put references back in.--CSvBibra 23:13, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A bit of history 

message: "In technique few bronze sculptors have ever equalled him, but his designs are marred by an excess of mannered realism and a too exuberant fancy." This sounds like a copy-paste from a reference, one written by someone who happens to like a different style, I don't see how that opinion is valid here, or very encyclopedic? JTdale  Talk 21:58, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: As the refs make clear, the text is based on/largely from the 1911 EB, when he was well out of fashion. Feel free to update it, with sources. Johnbod (talk) 01:19, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language on style
Talk:Philippe de Carteret I

message: I found the de Carteret pages while trying to sort out genealogical records on FamilySearch. There is some discrepancy and some matching. I believe the "they had two children" part is incorrect. Please see the record for Sir Phillipe de Cartert, b. 1553 and his wife Rachael Paulet (1550-1650), dates of life not seeming quite plausible and their 13 children, which includes the two listed. MindCapers (talk) 21:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The reference and the external link have no information about Philippe de Carteret I. Live links are needed.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 11:52, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  No reliable references
Talk:Pier Luigi Farnese

message: Article has more information for able translators. -LlywelynII (talk) 14:54, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: French wiki
Talk:Piero Soderini

message: I noted that the date of birth given in the article (March 17, 1451 – June 13, 1522) disagrees with brittanica.com which says Piero di Tommaso Soderini (born May 18, 1452, Florence Italy—died June 13, 1522, Rome, Papal States Italy).
I also noted that Treccani has two entries: Piero di Tommaso Soderini (1452-1522) written in 1936 and Piero Soderini (1451-1522) written in 2018 (1451 and 1452) Using automated translation I suppose that both entries describe the same person. Can anyone clarify the date and year of birth? --Kallichore (talk) 19:45, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year and date of birth?
Talk:Pierre Alamire

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composer project review of its B-class articles.  This article is B-class.  It needs an image or two (manuscript pages?), and could use more space on anonymous works suspected of being his.  Read the detailed review on the comments page; questions and comments can be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 16:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Hollygrove, New Orleans

message: Even though this article:
* Emery, Theo. "The Big Easy's Next Test." TIME. Thursday August 17, 2006.
says "At the Mary McLeod Bethune Elementary School, tucked into the city's residential Garden District, the hallways smelled of fresh paint, and new books were on display on the library shelves. In fact, everything was new in the school, principal Mary Hynes-Smith told students and parents assembled on the playground outside. "This is going to be a wonderful, wonderful school year," Hynes-Smith said. "We're going to make these kids the smartest kids in the world.""
In fact it is in Hollygrove, which is a distance away:
* Schleifstein, Mark. "Reaction cool to planned school shuffle." The Times-Picayune. Monday May 2, 2005. "A prime example is the proposed closure of Mary M. Bethune Elementary in Hollygrove, which received a positive two-star rating from the state, with a school performance score of 101 on a scale of 250. When the accountability system was introduced in 1999, the goal was to get all schools to score 100 by the year 2009."
WhisperToMe (talk) 07:01, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: * Per neighborhood designations, 4040 Eagle Street (former Bethune Elementary, now International School of Louisiana, is neither "Garden District" nor "Hollygrove", but rather in the Dixon neighborhood.  Here's one of photos of the building on Commons - but it doesn't belong in this article, so I'm removing the request to add it.  -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:29, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bethune Elementary is in Hollygrove, NOT Garden District 

message: — Assignment last updated by DauntlessTim (talk) 21:39, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: XCOR 1012, Digitizing New Orleans