lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Parish constable

message: Two recent edits attempted to improve the third paragraph of the introduction. I've reverted both of them because they each destroyed the sense of the phrase (that is, got it wrong.)
The original objection was (firstly) to the use of the name "London" to refer to the city of London (as compared to Greater London). I don't see that as an important distinction when talking about Parish constables in the 17th century, and anybody could have followed the link for disambiguation, but I would have left the change if the change hadn't broken the facts.
The second part of the objection was that it linked to a "City of London Police" article, when the City of London Police force isn't directly relevant. I made that link because the history section in that article is directly relevant, and contains the information required at that point. Again, I would have left the change if it was an improvement, but it wasn't.
The second edit attempted to repair the damage done by the first edit. Again, well meaning, but lost the information required at that point referring to English cities in general.
Both of you are welcome to try again: if you modify the paragraph again, it should retain the information that cities, other than the City of London, were reformed with metropolitan police forces, and a link to the information regarding the different situation in the City of London  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.224.212.199 (talk) 01:44, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cities other than London"
Talk:Euhelopodidae

message: Mamenchisaurus has been changed to "used to be" regarded as a member of this family (from "sometimes considered"). Lu et al (2006) and Royo-Torres et al. (2006) both considered Mamenchisaurus a Euhelopodid. What's happened in the two years since then? Firsfron of Ronchester 20:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Today, Mamenchisaurus has its own family, called Mamenchisauridae.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.42.180.142 (talk) 23:43, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Mamenchisaurus''
Talk:Illinois Freedom Bell

message: I am pretty sure there is only one decade between 1910 and 1920!  I leave it to someone who knows what is meant to consider altering the relevant sentence. Amity150 04:00, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I never got back to you on this. The exact date was found, so we shouldn't have to worry about this issue anymore! Thanks though.--Kranar drogin 02:54, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: math major

message: tha freeedom bell is very lo9ng and nice go and watch it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.146.131.166 (talk) 22:51, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  freedom bell about 
Talk:Yōichi Masuzoe

message: Yoichi Masuzoe,Kuniko Inoguchi,Shigehiko Hasumi and Takashi Inoguchi,they are notable academic reseachers and well-known faces on TV (Infotainments and reporting progammes)
Despite of their fine careers and achievements (including their presences on some international meetings held in U.S,U.K or Continental), 
:I wonder their few appearances in wikipedia.
Yoichi is also a pedagogy,and with his appearance of bald head , we sometimes regard him as an owarai.Uhhhhmm...----The DQN,macbeth 02:47, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 1st creator 
Talk:Transformers: The Score

message: Anyone have any information w.r.t. the "Promo" CD that appears to be making its rounds through the Internet? Like who leaked it, is it an official release or candidate for release or something?
Here's the track list I've found of that CD.
01 - Bogey Approach - Under Attack - Transformer Takes Aim
02 - Soldiers Arrive
03 - Camaro On the Run
04 - Scorpinok
05 - Pink Bike Pursuit
06 - Are You LadiesMan217
07 - Autobots to the Rescue
08 - When Feds Attack - Bumblebee Captured
09 - Hoover Dam
10 - Stumble Bumble
11 - Soldiers Retreat - Take the Cube - Megatron vs Optimus
12 - No Sacrifice, No Victory
13 - Sam Our Hero  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.86.143.192 (talk) 06:39, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The complete promo CD actually has 52 tracks, many of them under a minute long, for a total length of 1 hour, 17 minutes. These appear to be the actual music cues as used in the movie, rather than the full-length versions meant for solo listening, and many of the cues missing from the 1-disc set can only be found in that at the moment. It would be nice to have some mention of it made in the article, but I can't find any source of detailed information about it apart from torrents where it can be downloaded. —Robotech_Master 03:10, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Promo" CD score 

message: Amazon aren't taking one to three weeks to ship; I ordered my copy on Thursday night and recieved it on Saturday thanks to the insta-shippy thing. That said I did order off .co.uk, so maybe it means it just needs to get over the pond... Lady BlahDeBlah (talk) 16:10, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What shipping delay? 
Talk:Swami Ashokananda

message: May I suggest that this page be renamed Swami Ashokananda? Since a Hindu Sannyasin renounces his old name, and becomes known by his monastic name, it would be more appropriate to list this article under his monastic name. Moreover, he took the name Ashokananda early in life; for the majority of his lifetime he was known as Swami Ashokananda. Of course, it is appropriate to indicate his premonastic name in the text of the article. Sw.my 02:53, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just a note: the book Heart Poured Out, by Sister Gargi, is a useful biography of Swami Ashokananda; could be profitably consulted. Devadaru (talk) 03:16, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heart Poured Out Bio
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian motorsport/to do

message: I would like to ask as to what exactly is meant by 'Team Brock'. Team Brock was a 1970's Touring Car team run by Peter and Phil Brock, or a V8 Utes/Nations Cup team run by James Brock. Neither of which seem significant enough for articles. If it is meant to be the V8Supercar team called Team Brock, those 'Team Brock's were branding exericses only applied seperately at different times to Rod Nash Racing and to Paul Weel Racing, and as such should be covered in the articles about those two teams and not as a seperate article. --Falcadore 02:56, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Phobia (band)

message: Any sources to verify this band's notability? If not, it's headed to Afd... – ukexpat (talk) 20:36, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: , what additional reliable sources do you have for this article? czar 04:40, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources?
Talk:Peritonitis

message: Perhaps there should be a section on famous people who died of peritonitis? Like Harry Houdini.
:There is a section now. I removed the comment "he did not seek medical help" because back in this period of time there was no penicillin , surgery had high death rate and going to a doctor was no guarantee of being helped, so the decision not to seek medical help ( source needed) if true , was a reasonable one.--Mark v1.0 (talk) 17:43, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous people who died of peritonitis 

message: Does someone have information on how tubercular peritonitis infection occurs?  There is no mention in the article.  I am researching a female ancestor who died at age 23 years of this disease in the late 19th Century and I would like some more information.210.50.60.56 03:04, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I now have the answer to this question, thanks to someone who replied on the talk page for the miliary tuberculosis article.  My next question is, how common was it for tuberculosis to cause fatal peritonitis in the nineteenth century?  My ancestor was quite young (23) and lived in a western nation under quite good conditions for that time (upper middle class.) 210.50.56.58 21:45, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is difficult to assess how common a certain particular localisation of TB was in the 19th century, as obviously statistical data are lacking, and current medical textbooks are concerned with current data. However, I would say that among the various possible life-threatening manifestations of TB, peritonitis is and has always been pretty unlikely.  --Nehwyn 10:23, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your quick answer.  Much appreciated.  20:36, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tubercular Peritonitis

message: I made the templates. figured Fecal Peritonitis had very little to add and so should be merged here. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger_proposal 

message: Sentence from article "If untreated, generalised peritonitis is almost always fatal". Almost always? There were documented cases of self recovery? 91.77.247.134 (talk) 20:26, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:   Fatality 

message: Not mentioned in article. 109.157.79.50 (talk) 00:37, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "perimetritis" redirect here? 

message: It would be helpful if there were some image illustration and diagrams. TonyMorris68 (talk) 23:08, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  diagram illustrations needed
Talk:Atom probe

message: I have reverted the link to the Rouen page. If someone who is editing is actually from that research university could they please make a page, in english, that is basically a translation of the page that User:ApologeticFeet added. The pages linked to, whilst mainly in english, had minimal content  with links to other pages that mostly resulted in 404 errors which were in French. Apologeticfeet2 (talk) 08:44, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rouen page 

message: This article would potentially benefit from having some of the more notable review articles cited.  As it stands now, the only citation made where an author of the publication did not add the citation to WP is Miller's book (the white one).  Note well that I think the articles by Panitz and by Imago are good and appropriate citations, but I also think we can add more citations that would both survey other authors & would be more useful citations to readers of this article. --Karnesky (talk) 18:17, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  More references needed
Talk:MovieTome

message: It should be noted that as of late 2009, MovieTome had been working as usual again. It's defunct again now, however. —C Teng(talk) 01:22, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Briefly) revived 

message: I was one of the developers for FilmSpot/MovieTome, and for business reasons, MovieTome will now redirect to the movies section of Metacritic.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Semanticore (talk • contribs) 20:43, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  MovieTome officially shut down
Talk:Predator X (character)

message: المفترس شخصيه خياليه لاوجود له ابدن في واقع ولاكن هيا اسطيل من نسخ الخيال  بنيت على الخيال وتجسمة على افلام خيالية مابينا الشر والخيروانطبعة  في مخيلتي المشاهد @[[User:هللي|هل Hlli (talk) 21:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  المفترس هوشخصيه من خيال لاوقع لهووانهو  من اسطيل القديمه
Talk:Morrison Ranch, Agoura Hills, California

message: re: "the hubub of downtown Agoura Hills...." 
I'm not sure there IS a downtown in Agoura Hills, or any hubub. The biggest hubub is probably teenage skaters politely skating in front of the Starbucks on Kanan and Thousand Oaks Blvd. 
Suggest altering the "hubub" line. 
ElizaBarrington 03:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

message: This article insults by implying that the Morrison Highlands residents demonstrate "ostentatious displays of wealth."    I live in the Highlands and am unfamiliar with any "ostentatious displays of wealth."  Homes in the Highlands and Morrison Ranch were all built by the same builder within the same decade twenty years ago.  The homes in the Highlands happen to be larger, on larger lots and on higher ground, and accordingly, sell for prices higher than Morrison Ranch.   Highlands and Morrison Ranch residents are subject to the rules and benefits of the same home owners association. The neighborhoods are equally peaceful, well-kept and pleasant.    LisaM  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.156.53.133 (talk) 19:52, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morrison Highlands
Talk:Yu Hayami

message: "Soro soro fuyu desu nee" (released in 2024 as part of Cutie*MoriMori) should be added onto the Digital Singles table, but doing so ruins the whole order of the table (visual editor won't let me select it to edit, and source editor moves the whole table into the Albums section). I was able to add it to Iyo Matsumoto's discography, but I can't seem to do it with any luck here. 173.68.2.124 (talk) 00:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding to Discography
Talk:Takashi Inoguchi

message: is this by any chance the same author?
The ‘Clash of
Civilizations’ Faces
Evidence-based Perusal
TAKASHI INOGUCHI
UNIVERSITY OF NIIGATA PREFECTURE, JAPAN
http://www.e-ir.info/wp-content/uploads/Clash-of-Civilizations-E-IR.pdf
page: 31-38 (16-20 in pdf document)
(Not much in terms of essence, though.)
176.63.176.112 (talk) 10:23, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  criticism on Huntington?
Talk:Shigehiko Hasumi

message: Here is a suggested resolution:
# Move the article back to Shigehiko Hasumi
# Alter the lead section to something like
#: Shigehiko Hasumi (also styled Shiguehiko or Shigue'hiko) {hinongo} is  a Japanese film critic ... blah blah
#In the body of the article, not right at the top, add a note on the various stylings of his name. I'd suggest that we don't add the WP:SYNTH analysis that he has changed his preferences, or that he uses one or the other form when writing one or another language, without clear reliable sources. I'd also strongly suggest removing most of the rather dubious references currently placed after the names, since this was the product of a rather unfortunate debating style.
If you agree with this, please indicate below, and then if this is acceptable, we'll inform the admin who protected the page.
JoshuSasori (talk) 00:02, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds like a very reasonable solution. Thanks. Michitaro (talk) 00:12, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Up to additional references, this is finished I think. JoshuSasori (talk) 13:03, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested compromise
Talk:Tokyo Metropolitan Government Bureau of Waterworks

message: There is plenty of info at the Japanese wikipedia article, but it will require translation.  Google translator does not seem to work so well on Japanese.--Diannaa (talk) 03:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanding the article
Talk:Marjorie Oelrichs

message: Kim Novak did not play Marjorie  Oelrichs in The Eddy Duchin Story. The role was played by actress Victoria Shaw.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:921A:800:150F:C770:F1DC:385A (talk) 03:36, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Natalia Verbeke

message: I realize she's done all her acting in Spain but isn't she still an Argentine actress? I can't imagine a foreign-born actor being referred to as an American actor no matter how many American films he's been in. 68.166.64.193 (talk) 11:39, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello. The filmography here includes the film 'Hermanas' (2003). Neither the Wikipedia nor the IMDB entries for 'Hermanas' (dir. Julia Solomonoff) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermanas have a reference to Natalia Verbeke as one of the film's actresses. I hope this is useful. VeryOccasionalEditing (talk) 11:56, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmography error? 
Talk:Al-Qaeda of Mesopotamia

message: The translation makes all the difference in the world. Using the preposition "in" ("in Iraq") implies a connection between an external Al-Qaeda (notably the one that planned the attack on the US on 9/11) and alleges its operation inside Iraq. (More on prepositions is here.) Using "in" also creates an ambiguity, especially when spoken: is the speaker referring to Osama bin Laden's group, moved to operate within Iraq, or to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's indigenous Iraqi group? It can be impossible to tell -- which may reflect the intention of certain speakers. 
Early translations clearly used "Al-Qaeda of Mesopotamia", and  many leading news sources still do (including Bloomberg, New York Times, International Herald Tribune).  E.g.:  
"A new terrorist group inside Iraq has named itself -- conveniently for Bush's purposes -- al-Qaeda of Mesopotamia. But they had nothing to do with 9/11 since they didn't exist at the time."
"The Mujahedeen Shura, an umbrella group that claims Al Qaeda of Mesopotamia as a member, said in a statement posted on the Internet that the successor to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, had slaughtered the two Americans." 
"A former associate of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the leader of Al Qaeda of Mesopotamia who was killed last summer, Mr. Abssi was sentenced to death in absentia along with Mr. Zarqawi in the 2002 assassination of an American diplomat" 
"Military intelligence officials said that Al Qaeda of Mesopotamia's leaders wanted to expand their attacks to other countries." 
The choice of language here is crucial.  DBrnstn 03:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My redirecting the article just has to do with Wikipedia's policies; I have no idea what the appropriate title for this article should be.  If you want to change the title of an article, what you need to do is discuss it on the article's talk page (Talk:Al-Qaeda in Iraq, no one is looking at this page) and then, if you can get everyone to agree with you, move the article to a new title using the "move" tab at the top of the article (next to "history").  Creating duplicate articles like this leads to all sorts of problems that you can probably imagine.  I hope this is clear.--P4k 03:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bulletin international du mouvement syndicaliste

message: I've added a bit more information about the organizations involved in the bulleting. I hope you will agree with me that this is without doubt enough to establish notability and remove the tag.--Carabinieri 04:00, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am removing the tag now. If anyone thinks this topic is not notable enough to merit an article of its down, then that user should nominate it for deletion.--Carabinieri 07:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability tag
Talk:Trek73

message: Via a tortuous route, this article has been restored despite an AfD that ended with a consensus on merging. I have checked Google, Google Books and even Google News, to no avail. I honestly cannot see any support for notability for this article subject. Would anyone care to provide some before another AfD? Alastairward (talk) 18:03, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Mentioned in widely read book Hackers, page 187. Notable, removing notice. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:16, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I'll restore that tag, it's mentioned once apparently as a "new game", nothing else. Alastairward (talk) 15:37, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And I believe that WP:BURDEN (for those removing the tag) and WP:Notability applies here. I was only seeking the "Significant coverage" and detail required to prove notability. Especially considering that although the last AfD may not have ended in deletion, but a merging to another article. Alastairward (talk) 22:35, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: As per above, I couldn't find any notability supplied for this article. There is a trivial mention in the book noted above, previous AfD consensus was that this article couldn't stand by itself and should be merged to another. 
If anyone would like to provide any notability, please do, I'm in no hurry to renominate. Alastairward (talk) 11:31, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Probably renomination for AfD

message: "Simulation" was deleted from the body of the article and categories.  I don't necessarily object to referring to it as a game in the body, however it may be useful to categorize it as a simulation.  The Star Trek text and script games, while also primitive, are in simulation categories.  I've put the sim category back for consistency and to make it easy to find the game.  Also, it appears that for the categories game and simulation may be interchangeable. LionelT (talk) 22:33, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simulation? 

message: I have reviewed the source code. The program was published in 1973 and bears no copyright notice.  Per WP:Public domain#When does copyright expire? it is in the public domain.  This is the same process for determining whether a picture, drawing or book is in public domain and doesn't require a source.  
Is the game also Freeware?  Unlikely.  Freeware usually is released as such and bears a mark indicating so.  Additionally, the term "freeware" postdates TREK73 by 12 years .
So, the game is de facto in the public domain and should be indicated as such. It could additionally be freeware but that is undetermined. If there are no further objections, I'll remove the tag. LionelT (talk) 00:56, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: De facto? Ah, de facto. In absence of a 3rd party cite, it will have to remain tagged. An alternative would be to leave that section empty for the moment, as per other similar games. WikiuserNI (talk) 01:11, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  License
Talk:Paleoconservative worldview

message: I am against merging this article back into the main article of Paleoconservatives as this article is 60 Kb long and is about a topic specific enough to merit its own article. The main article talks about their history, influences, current status, and a brief overview of their believes. This seperate article allows for a greater focus on their believes without bogging down the main article.Rougher07 04:09, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:1991 in heavy metal music

message: There was a bullet point that said all the above bands' albums debuted at #1, and at the time they were all on tour together.  While all their albums did debut at #1 and they did tour together, Metallica and Skid Row already have their own bullet points making note of their respective #1 albums and associated feats.  Additionally, Guns N' Roses's chart feat is very unique (debuting two albums to the top two spots), particularly for a rock band, and deserves its own bullet point.  Finally, all these bands were on tour together in 1992, not 1991.  Thus, the explanation for my changes. Abog 04:15, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Guns N' Roses/Metallica/Skid Row
Talk:Mount Jackson (Montana)

message: Mount Jackson was climbed by Frank B. Wynn and his son James Wynn in August 1912. david.walters@horizon.ab.ca has a copy of the journal written by James Wynn describing the 1912 climb. James does not suggest that it was a first ascent, but Frank B Wynn was the first to climb several peaks in Glacier. He climbed Mt. Cleveland in 1920 with Harry R Horn and John F. Habber. This predates the 1924 climb of Cleveland by the Sierra Club who currently claim the first ascent. david.walters@horizon.ab.ca found the Nature Study Club of Indiana summit log book near the summit of Cleveland in 2001 showing the 1920 date. Copies available on request. (moved from article space to here)--MONGO 02:01, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First ascent information