lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of tallest buildings in Halifax, Nova Scotia

message: This should titled List of tallest buildings in the Halifax Regional Municipality
I think this list is suffering from omissions, a few towers from the Dartmouth side of the Harbour, for instance the glass-fronted office tower by the Macdonald Bridge, and the new condo development behind Mic Mac Mall would both be taller than the CIBC building I think. 24.202.232.155 (talk) 13:40, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to add them (200 feet+) Sportyguy03 (talk) 00:30, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page: "The Maristella at King's Wharf will become the tallest building in Atlantic Canada and the first building in Atlantic Canada to exceed 100 m in height"
Also this page: The Vüze 106 m.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 Md-wikip (talk) 01:04, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maristella Tower section
Talk:Robert Hamilton (Scottish footballer)

message: Could the fact he was reffered to as RC be related to amateur status. Certainly it was common in cricket (and early football to a degree) to differentiate between players by using initials for amateurs and full names for professionals. He would obviously have been an amateur while with Queens Park, might he have also been at other points during his career? Caledonian Place 14:46, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: RC Hamilton
Talk:Age of racehorses

message: This page really should not exist, particularly considering there is no discussion of the controversies surrounding horseracing and the incredibly early age that training begins. From what I've seen so far, none of the horseracing articles are very "pro" and therefore biased. I'd like to see someone with some neutrality come through and fix up the whole category. -jett
:Why should controversies about the sport be in "Age of racehorses", the article is about a completely different topic. Would you mind specifying what you call "biased"? Thanks. Malc82 15:47, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Examples (apart from the general rough writing)
1) a criteria  (criteria is plural)
2) Why is height of a pony tacked on?
3) If a horse has a trip to another hemisphere can its notional age change? What would happen near the equator? There surely are rules for those cases.
4) Is the list of races relevant? In what land/s are they run?
5) Gelding seems of no relevance to "Age of racehorses"--SilasW 21:21, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit needed

message: I have done some copyediting and clarifications. Let me address some of the examples you mentioned:
*1 and 2 - solved
*3 - the offical birthday is determined by where a horse was bred and stays the same regardless in which hemisphere the horse currently is. Some tracks which expect horses of both hemispheres to compete in their races (most prominently Nad Al Sheba Racecourse) will declare races "for 4yo Northern hemisphere breds and 3yo Southern hemisphere breds", usually assigning differnet weights to both groups. I'm sure that racing countries on the equator, such as Brazil or Indonesia, have regulations to make sure that all their horses are counted as belonging to the same hemisphere.
*4 - The list makes clear that some of the most prestigious races are run amongst younger horses, so it might be best if it stays.
*5 - it's useful to let that stay. If only colts and fillies would be mentioned one obvious question for the passing reader would be "What about geldings?".
Malc82 11:04, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit done
Talk:Indraneil Sengupta

message: The result was that the topic is notable, probably. --B. Wolterding 16:12, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you that the subject is not notable enough to be included on wiki. But i am a deletionist so its better if we wait for some more comments.--nids(♂) 16:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert review 
Talk:J. Philip Grime

message: i disagree with the advert template... perhaps if the reference to his book in the introduction was removed the advert tag can also be removed? This is far less self-promoting than many other biographies which lack the advert tag. Jebus989 (talk) 14:13, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  advert? 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Lynotic

message: Google + Google Scholar both come up with nothing relevant for Lynotic, and nothing for the Lynotic book. Anyone find sources? --h2g2bob (talk) 14:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If "the only way to save the language is by putting it on Wikipedia," then you've come to the wrong place. Anonymous or pseudonymous Wikipedia editors cannot be, for obvious reasons, reliable sources. If Wikipedia were to allow original research by Wikipedia editors, Wikipedia wouldn't have an informative encyclopedia; it would be a misinformative blogopedia. For this reason, Wikipedia is not the place to publish things that have not been published elsewhere. If you want to publish things on this language, then do so outside of Wikipedia. If it's published in reputable sources, then those sources can be used to introduce content into Wikipedia that passes Wikipedia's core policies (verifiability, neutral point of view, no original research). Pan Dan 14:13, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If I find a external link to Lynotic would that be enough to put this article again on Wikipedia? --Janvanhorn 15:33, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have an external link to a reliable, published source that discusses this language, then that would be a good start. (More than one source would be even better.) Pan Dan 16:04, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Sources, please. What are the sources that indicate that Lynotic is another name for West Frisian? Pan Dan 17:54, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I mailed User:Janvanhorn to ask what Ǣres means. He said it means West. I remember he once said that Ǣres Lynotic somekind of frisian language was. I know it isn't a reliable source but it's more than this article now.--Arjanv 18:08, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't sais Aeres Lynotic, I said Aeres Frysk Janvanhorn 18:12, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: AEres msn community --Janvanhorn 18:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Ookwel AEres linotieks? Translated: aka AEres lynotic. Danke... --Arjanv 18:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A reliable source, please. An MSN chatroom is not a reliable source. Pan Dan 18:27, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I know doch Janvanhorn seemly not... --Arjanv 16:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Janvanhorn praat voortaan Engels of Nederlands dat kun je tenminste! --Arjanv 17:40, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hebben we dit onderwerp niet al besproken op mijn overlegpagina? ;-) --Janvanhorn 17:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hoax?
Talk:The Earthquake in Chile

message: Performed requested copy-edit. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:33, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed a  tag from the plot summary because I think it's about the right length. --Tony Sidaway 11:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary

message: "This year there actually was an earthquake in Chile that measured a catostrophic 8.8 on the richter scale"
Is completely unnecessary - there have been many earthquakes in Chile since the novella was written. 217.24.66.34 (talk) 12:27, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference to 2010 earthquake
Talk:Dimples of Venus

message: Is there any conceivable reason why the picture used is butt-ugly?  (pun intended, and purposefully not signed.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.3.9.65 (talk • contribs) 07:36, 2 September 2007
:This was the first photo i found when i looked for one to illustrate the article. Beauty was not a goal. Foobaz·o< 17:53, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beauty 

message: Rarely used obstetrical use of DOV (Dimples of Venus)
Folkplace (talk) 21:55, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uses for Dimples of Venus (DOV) 

message: This feature is not confined to females, males can have them too. I'm an example of this, and always wondered what they were or were called.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.55.189.193 (talk) 16:47, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Fact added to the article. - dcljr (talk) 08:47, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Men have them too.
Talk:Interexchange carrier

message: Surely this is poor content, the charging mechanisms between Telcos are in themselves worthy of Detail.
In europe with have a series of regulators to match, Open Market considerations will come in to play.
In the UK Offcom (www.offcom.org.uk) would have an insistance on the provison of same services to all, Openreach was formed to seperate the regulated and non regulated bit of the former State Telco BT. 
The reults has been everyone and his mother can now provide a broadband service over the old BT copper( they would deny there is Aluminium in the ground but it was cheap in the 80s); hence company xx broadband.
Perhaps this would be be rewritten by someone current on the cross connect and billing systems. 
For modern bearer (long distance)  MPLS networks in my last Telco we were subject to Regulatory requirements of Government still, for example providing  Video Conferencing Switch to a large drinks supplier (no names mentioned) put you in the domain of the FDA in the US; European deregulated markets would not even consider US Government requiremnts of such traffic.
Kind regards
David
David.misell@iee.org  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.136.203 (talk) 09:37, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Billing 

message: This arrangement is dead, or is approved to have died:
http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2012/2012-521.htm
--Mathieu ottawa (talk) 16:46, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fido and Yak 

message: I would like to add the zip code in the description of the city where i live. Also, the nearest city , which happens to be the county seat should be added. Moorermary (talk) 01:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zip code
Talk:Split (bowling)

message: I think we should make a separate page for washouts, since they are technically not splits. Just a thought.
T.Nguyen092 16:12, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be nice, if there was enough information to constitute a seperate page, which I don't think is true. Alex43223 T | C | E  03:13, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Washouts

message: * :Split (ten pin bowling) →  — Unnecessary disambig. — 
* Oppose. "Bowling" without further description is ambiguous: it often means bowling a ball in cricket. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: *Whether "Bowling" is ambiguous is beside the point.  The issue here is whether Split (bowling) is ambiguous.  That is, should Split (bowling) be a dab page with links to several articles about different topics each of which is about some kind of bowling-related split?   Since Split (bowling) is not a dab page, but a redirect to Split (ten pin bowling), that is apparently not the case. --Born2cycle (talk) 17:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

text: *That is irrelevant, unless there is an article in WP about splits in green bowling (so far as I know, that is not the case).  We don't add precision to avoid conflicts with any conceivable topic; we add precision to avoid conflicts with other topics for which articles exist in Wikipedia.  --Born2cycle (talk) 16:57, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 

message: The article contradicts itself or is at least very confusing.  First it says you cannot a convert a 7-10 split by sliding one pin into the other, and then it says you can.  None of the video of a 7-10 split conversion, however, support the second claim (by sliding).  Stephen C. Carlson (talk) 20:03, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction?

message: I was reading the Bowling News paper (or whatever its called) last season, while I was waiting for my turn in league play, and they were describing another way to pick up the 7-10 split because some youngster had just done it. It was a light ball and it traveled so slowly it bounced off the 10 and rolled over to hit the 7. Since it was in that official paper should it be added to this article as a way to pick up that split? Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:43, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 7-10 Conversion

message: I was going through the possible splits and some were not listed. Maybe they don't counts as a split but I have not found any reason why not. Here they are: 2-4-10, 3-6-7, 4-6-7, 6-7-10, 7-8-10 and 7-9-10.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JCArdussi (talk • contribs) 09:20, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other splits
Talk:Rail signaller

message: Agree with the source template. However I know bugger all about trains. Any train fans who know there stuff please update this page. But I am currently going through the links to the old signalman page, and pointing them here. Renski 15:23, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a request for help on the Talk:Railway_signalling page in order to get something here. If that fails, I'll write a few basic sentaces myself. Renski 15:56, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the speedy deletion marker, I've added a little more information up to the minimum of three sentances for a stub. But again, someone else needs to work on this. Renski 16:16, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion Held at Signalman (Rail) 

message: I am a signaller currently working for Network Rail in the UK. I have added a section to the main page titled "Duties Today". Feel free to edit or even delete if you wish if you feel I am treading on someones toes.  I am willing to add or give advice on any aspect of my work. Also, just want to add that the company itself (Network Rail) calls its employees signallers and not signalman or signalwoman. Times are changing and the past 150+ years are irrelevant. However, this fact I feel should show in the History section. Michaelduly 17:32, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signaller On Site 

message: This edit lamenting the demise of "The old railway, which was operated almost solely by blue collar workers and front-line managers such as station masters" rings true, but "rings true" cuts no ice as a Wikipedia reliable source. Tagged  and . --Old Moonraker (talk) 14:07, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That whole section sounds like a POV essay 62.252.63.179 (talk) 13:34, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  White collar and blue collar 

message: There seems to be a bit of a gap which misses-out the 'golden age' of 'levers-and-bells' signalling and jumps straight to 'Signallers Today'.  I am a passed signaller on a preserved steam railway, so I will insert a new section called 'Signalling - Historical' soon, which will deal with a little of the everyday 'nitty-gritty' of block working. 5.81.27.83 (talk) 19:49, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Signallers

message: The stub article "Switchman" should be merged with Signalman, their job description varies slightly and its often used interchangeably.  Neoking (talk) 16:02, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, good idea. But there is another pending merge proposal: "Signalman" -> "Train dispatcher" Taylor 49 (talk) 10:48, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge suggestions: "Switchman" -> "Signalman" and "Signalman" -> "Train dispatcher"
Template talk:Mortal Kombat characters

message: Should this template added to the template section of WikiProject MK, because it covers the characters of MK series? Master Spider 16:19, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Should this template have all of the characters? Bud0011 (talk) 16:32, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this template have all of the characters?
Talk:Big Brother (British TV series) series 8/Archive 4

message: She mentioned on the live feed last night that her surame is Owen. Do we have any evidence of this anywhere else? Triangle e 20:43, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: She's probably fantasising about marrying Michael Owen or something... godgoddingham 333 12:00, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Charley's surname

message: Wasn't sure how to list Billi and Charley's nominations for this week...Do we say they were banned from voting, even though they did? Or do we make a note 
that their nominations weren't counted (I'd say the latter personally). And also, do we count their nominations on the nominations table, or not, as they weren't counted by Big Brother? Babygurl1853 18:57, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we shouldn't list the housemates they voted for, that information is now irrelevant; it now needs some banned from nominations type value.John Hayestalk 23:10, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I think that we should leave their nominations in there, for posterity's sake, and maybe colour it the blue that we normally do, or italicise them, which is what I did originally... godgoddingham 333 23:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Sounds possible...godgoddingham 333 23:54, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

text: I took the initiative. Darrenhusted 00:05, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good. John Hayestalk 07:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to list this week's (week 4)'s nominations? 

message: Maybe it would be a good idea to have a counter at the show to show what day it is of the show Acasperw 21:42, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My feeling would be the fact that it would have to change everyday means it shouldn't be part of an encylopedia. John Hayestalk 23:12, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

text: I concur. Darrenhusted 23:34, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Ditto godgoddingham 333 23:55, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feature Request 

message: The bottom of the page says that Laura has recieved six nominations, but to my knowledge she has only recieved two (Carole Week Three, Carole Week Four). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.205.62.10 (talk) 05:33, 28 June, 2007 (UTC)
:Assuming the nominations table is correct that would appear to be the case. I have corrected. John Hayestalk 11:43, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination Count 

message: I feel that, since in this series the Channel4 website uses the term removed instead of rejected, this page, too, should regard Emily as having been "removed" and not "rejected". —Preceding unsigned comment added by That-E-Man (talk • contribs) 08:43, 28 June, 2007 (UTC)
:There is a long conversation on this in the archives of this talk page, If you would like to further discuss this do so on the big brother wikiproject talk page. John Hayestalk 09:30, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ejected"
Talk:Dame N'Doye

message: The 23:09, 28 September 2014‎ Geregen2 version of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia to expand a stub.--Wing (talk) 17:43, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation into Chinese Wikipedia 
Talk:Michael Papajohn

message: LOL, does he eat at Papa John's?  LOL!!!!!!!!!!
Is his original surname Papaioannou? Ioanni/Ioannis is Greek for John. 101.162.78.164 (talk) 12:45, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pizza
Talk:Fløibanen

message: Should this be merged into the Fløyen article? --Safe-Keeper 16:32, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Geschichte (talk) 16:42, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Initial paragraph reads like an advert 31.124.97.66 (talk) 16:44, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality
Talk:Compucolor

message: I remember this model, but it had a nice BASIC in ROM.  I think it was max 48K RAM too.  Was it discontinued in '93 or '83? 75.18.207.111 16:42, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note 1: the Intecolor History website mentions "an overall 64KB operating system memory allocation"...Ben Hocking (talk) 17:10, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Note 2: Also from that site: "By mid 1993, production of traditional 8001, 3800, 8800, AGS, were basically discontinued from production." I'm adding the 1993 date back to "discontinued." Ben Hocking (talk) 17:10, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: " the history depicted here is not concentrated on the Compucolor II, but on the Intecolor brand of products."75.18.207.111 02:35, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

message: The article (and title) refer to the machine varyingly as "Compucolor" and "CompuColor". Which is correct? A page move may be required. 86.139.61.114 (talk) 16:03, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone has fixed it. Thanks. 86.139.61.114 (talk) 19:11, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect capitalisation 

message: I know that the original CompuColor (model 8001) is often considered "the first desktop color graphic computer", but was it not also the first home computer in general, color or not? Being released in December of 1976, this predates the "Trinity of 1977". So was this the first all-in-one desktop microcomputer available to consumers? If so, that seems like something worth noting.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.218.24.11 (talk) 14:20, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  First home computer?
Talk:330th Aircraft Sustainment Wing

message: Zureks (talk) 20:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Permission

message: * I don't think these should be merged at all.  WWII should be treated separately from the rest of these groups. --B29bomber (talk) 20:30, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  If the units have the same lineage, then retain it as one article. Bwmoll3 (talk) 14:50, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

text: I think that's a bit unfair to the current mission.  During WWII it was one of how many bombardment groups?  Certainly it made a contribution to the allied success of the war, but today it is the sole unit responsible for the depot level maintenance for 17 different airframes including the entire strategic airlift fleet and most of the special operations and reconnaissance fleet.  With the limited size of the aircraft fleet compared to World War II its role today is absolutely critical.  True it's not winning fame by driving the Taliban out of Afghanistan, but if it wasn't doing its job planes would literally be falling out of the sky.  In short, please don't discount the importance of logistics to a war effort (and no, I'm not a loggie myself, but that doesn't mean I don't respect their contribution).--Ndunruh (talk) 18:58, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Discussion
Talk:General Electric GE36

message: The article doesn't has the potency of this turbine.How many kylos, pounds,etc. this turbine produces?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.9.110.27 (talk) 13:31, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Where's the potency of turbine?

message: It says the turbine powering the prop utilizes "the mixed air" from the F404 core...this means that it retains the low-bypas of he original and uses the cold and hot exhaust stream to power a third turbine stage? But why? It seems like you could get more efficiency by just skipping the normal fan and turbine. This way you've got to extract energy from the exhaust stream (not perfect efficiency), power a fan with it that energizes air, and the re-extract the energy from the air again with yet another turbine, wasting more power. Why not skip the fan stage? Unless of course it really needs that bypass air to cool the core, and it was cheaper to just use it as-is than to redesign it with an even lower bypass-ratio for cooling purposes only.AnnaGoFast (talk) 12:57, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fan air 

message: A GE36 prototype was donated to the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum (NASM) in the early 1990s, although it's currently not on display there. It was stored in the Paul E. Garber Preservation, Restoration, and Storage Facility in Suitland, Maryland after that, but I don't know the engine's whereabouts at this moment. It might be in the NASM annex at the Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center in Fairfax County, Virginia. Here's what the GE36 display looked like. D271l (talk) 03:02, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos requested
Talk:315th Airlift Wing

message: You need to rethink the CV2 entry (shown as 1949-52). The Caribou first flew in 1958. I suspect you mean the short period in 1966 when the Wing was at Tan Son Nhut, and had the RAAF CV-2s under command, following the redesignation of the 315th Air Commando Group to Wing.Lexysexy (talk) 04:42, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Caribou