lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Holy Ghost Preparatory School

message: "Allocated"? Do you mean "acclaimed"? BillFlis 13:15, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Allocated

message: User 146.145.221.130 is vandalising other pages - perhaps someone with knowledge of this page subject can check his edits here they look less obvious atm I have reverted for the moment.Alci12 16:43, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: Since January 2019, Arizona2015's only contributions have been removing content from the article from other users. See contribution history Special:Contributions/Arizona2015 - 71.185.64.183, 20 March 2021  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.185.64.183 (talk) 19:32, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Article is moderated by sources too closely related to the subject matter
Talk:Eden's Bowy

message: Somebody replaced my text with a cut-and-paste of the text here. What do you think of it? Purple Rose 13:23, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio?

message: I have reverted the cover image to the original one. – Matthew A. Lockhart (talk) 12:09, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover 

message: The author who wrote the original 14-volume manga for Eden's BoWy is named Kitsune Tennouji (sometimes Tennoji). Here's a reference:
http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/manga.php?id=5911&page=28
Don't you think you should mention it?
Timothy Perper 21:50, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No manga?
Talk:Mujaddid

message: From an encyclopedic perspective, I see there being only two possibilities for potential candidates for this list: individuals whom reliable secondary sources have said were mujaddid, called mujaddid or claimed to mujaddid (with the possibility of distinguishing somehow between those identified as mujaddid and those who simply claimed it for themselves); and those whom reliable secondary sources have said none of these things. In this context, what on earth is a potential mujaddid? Does anyone have an answer? And if not, can we agree to dispense with what seems to be an overly ambiguous wording, and ensure that this list only includes individuals somehow connected directly with the term mujaddid in reliable secondary sources? Iskandar323 (talk) 17:33, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the word potential is not particularly useful. But beyond that, I think  all we can do is continue to include those who claimed to be or were claimed to be, per reliable secondary sources. It's possible we could add a little explanatory text about each claimant and their following. PepperBeast (talk) 21:28, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: What is a potential mujaddid?

message: Can someone add Taqi al-Din al-Subki to 7th century please Galaxy21ultra (talk) 19:52, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taqi al-Din al-Subki 

message: Shaikh Mahmud Efendi an-Naqshbandi al-Mujaddidi al-Khalidi can be added to the Mujaddids of the 14. century. He is often claimed to be the Mujaddid of this century. The sources often say 15. century but the century starting in 1979/1980 is meant.
These would be the sources:
https://www.ismailaga.org.tr/hicri-15-asrin-muceddidi
https://kashmirreader.com/2022/06/29/sheikh-mahmud-effendi-the-great-orator-of-islam/ Davut al-Maturidi (talk) 14:53, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mahmud Efendi 

message: The activities of a Mujadid is like a heretical person, for those individuals in political office.
09:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heretic 

message: 182.185.181.63 (talk) 08:23, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. User:CanonNi (talk|contribs) 08:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 April 2024
Talk:SoulO

message: i removed the entire album info section: its sounding like a review and bias Tomba 13:31, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Jaz drive

message: " it was largely unnecessary to transport a gigabyte worth of information at a time when hard drives were still only a few gigabytes". Actually in those days, hard disks were measured in megabytes. The largest hard disk that systems based on IDE could handle were 540MeB (512MiB). The statement is kind of vague and obviously speculation so I won't edit it. But just so you know :-) Jac Goudsmit (talk) 18:33, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: IDE may have been limited to 540MB, but there were 2GB SCSI drives available by 1993.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.184.250.4 (talk) 00:04, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 1GB was BIG

message: I had a Jaz drive, and experienced a lot of reliability problems.  I'll try to do some research and expand this article.  Blaxthos 12:44, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I also had a 1GB Jaz and had the click-of-death as well as corrupt data. It was a $600 flop! I ended up with several unusable and very expensive cartages. DavidRavenMoon (talk) 17:11, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Reliability

message: changed "Winchester hard drive" to "hard drive" as Winchester is redundant and will mean nothing to most people Bangers 13:32, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Symantecs

message: Should this read
*The Jaz drive was a removable disk storage system
or
*The Jaz drive is a removable disk storage system
The question comes up sometimes. 98.82.34.167 (talk) 08:23, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verb tense 

message: Nice consistency here. This is a redirect from "Jaz drive" to "Iomega Jaz drive", but "Iomega Zip drive" is a redirect to "Zip drive". Huh? So the company is relevant for Jaz but not for Zip? 82.141.93.49 (talk) 10:54, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirects 

message: "The Jaz drive is less prone to failure than is the Zip drive.". Bullshit. That was the worse piece of technology I ever owned, and losing 1GB of data is much worse than 100MB.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.30.124.150 (talk) 19:04, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  less prone to failure than zip drive 

message: The article should say how big these things were, or the photograph should be replaced by one with a ruler in it. --76.71.6.254 (talk) 05:32, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dimensions
Talk:Destroy 2

message: I removed a  tag from this article, since I feel it meets WP:MUSIC because it's one of Yamataka Eye's bands. Also, this is more on the album than the band, and albums by musicians deemed notable are mostly deemed notable too. However, I have no abojections to a proper AFD discussion of this article if somebody does not agree with me. -- grm_wnr Esc 13:37, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Clonfert Cathedral

message: This seems to be mostly correct, it may be based on the following web article:
My Place Amongst The Stones.
I believe it is still a current CofI church.  Will see if I can find a more definitive source.
--Yeah I agree, I am removing the  tag--Trounce 14:55, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct

message: References for this article need a lot of work, but I'm not ready to start on that yet. I include the old but interesting link below since it may some day prove to be of use:
* Insula Sanctorum et Doctorum
*History of the Irish Hierarchy]
*Monasticon Hibernicum
This article is missing lots of key information and dates on the history of the structure. Many of them can be found here, though there are likely even better sources:
* 
* 
Between these two, we can set the date range of Church of Ireland/Anglican Bishop Edward Wolley's reconstruction of the cathedral to 1664–1678. We also know what the coat of arms associated with the bishopric was (as well as Wolley's own). Another source on the CoA:
*  – Requires some interpretation; Welland is neither the originator of the arms nor the author of the database entry, but the 19th-century architectural artist who drew the record of the arms and recorded what he saw. He got one tincture as "Argent" (silver/white) when the other source says "Or" (gold/yellow), but given the degraded state of the original painted wooden panel (as seen in the source before this one) such uncertainty is not surprising.
 — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  00:24, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Archibald Roosevelt

message: Archibald Bulloch Roosevelt, Jr. (Foreign Service Officer)
I have created a new article on him. SimonATL 12:00, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks Tweed for Adding Archie's son

message: This article has so many problems with references and sources that I can't detail them all. Being a spokesman for "extreme right wing causes", being "expelled from Groton", the "National Economy League" with a "proposal to cut appropriations to veterans by half", and to close, the whole section titled "Right Wing Firebrand" is strewn with statements, that even in that distant rash past appear to be out of line, even racist and unprovable. Basically, there are not any good references to back any of the above questionable statements. The general article seems ok, but the challanged stuff has to come out unless supported.--TGC55 (talk) 00:38, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Source & reference problems with article

message: Wikiquote & Wikisource has no files related to Archibald Roosevelt. Somebody more knowledgable than me will have to use a proper search technique for those Wiki's. From what I didn't find, I'd say that those links should be removed. There are files on Wikicommons.--TGC55 (talk) 01:41, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikisource & Wikiquote 

message: Trying to read this article is, well, trying. There are incomplete sentences and non sequiturs throughout. Possibly from too many after-the-fact revisions.Bdcrph (talk) 17:29, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help! Text editor needed! 
Talk:Jon

message: I removed "Jon" Paul Jones (since it's actually "John") and added Jon Lord
--Purple74 (talk) 07:57, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Jon (singer) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 18#Jon (singer) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  MB 04:50, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Jon (singer)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:The Most Beautiful Girl in the World (Prince song)

message: I take it this is distinct from the Rodgers and Hart song of the same name? If so I'll update the link on that page. Cdyson37 13:47, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rodgers & Hart

message: According to the Mayte Garcia entry, these two were married in 1996, not '94 as this entry says. IMDB also lists 1996 as the year, but since infomation is submitted by users, it may not be accurate. Whichever year is correct, both entries should be modified to be in agreement. ---Jackel 20:35, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of marriage to Prince? 

message: I!dont believe my eyes when i see Nacho Cano (member of spanish famous group MECANO ) who is playing on the syntetisor in the clip of the most beautiful girl in the world 2A02:A03F:65B9:3E00:39AE:491:D551:3A4B (talk) 12:10, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pianist on the video clip
Talk:Harry Vail

message: By "Syracuse" I think is meant "Syracuse University". BillFlis 13:52, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I belive that is correct, and Wisconsin i am pretty sure refers to University of Wisconsin. --Boothy443 |  trácht ar 04:17, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact, it says "University of Wisconsin" at the top. Also, "Poughkeepsie title" seems to refer to something other than the city. BillFlis 11:18, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh yea, didnt catch that their, suppose might do unlinking the second refrence, even though it does to a different article. As for "Poughkeepsie title", i don't know what that would be, it's Union college up that way, figure thy might have something to do with it. --Boothy443 |  trácht ar 04:12, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a "Poughkeepsie Regatta" on the Web, a precursor to "IRAs" (Intercollegiate Rowing Assoc. Championships?). I'll insert a link to a future article. BillFlis 11:10, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I created a small article on the Regatta. I also changed the city/state links in question to university links. BillFlis 11:27, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:TNT (Australian TV station)

message: Hi.  For tens of millions of American TV viewers (as well as Germans, Spanish and Turkish viewers), "TNT" usually means "Turner Network Television," so shouldn't this page have a disambiguation link to that page as well?  Thanks.122.26.35.196 (talk) 04:38, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: TNT should be linked/disambiguated to the American cable station TNT as well

message: Please see Talk:TNT#Proposed_name_change to read and reply to this proposal, thanks. Ubcule (talk) 15:21, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed name change of [[TNT (TV Channel)]] and [[TNT (TV station)]]
Talk:United States congressional delegations from Illinois

message: It would be nice to get some details as to the area that congressional districts covered over the years. Does anyone have a source of maps or descriptions of the Illinois congressional districts prior to 2003? --Dual Freq 05:22, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical apportionment

message: Hi - don't know if this is the best talk page to ask at, but I'll try....
I found a Find-A-Grave bio for a representative that appears to be missing from this page, and from Wikipedia: CARLSON, Cliffard Dale (rep 1972 - 1973; filled the vacancy after Charlotte Reid stepped down) - his bioguide is at , his Find-A-Grave entry is at . I'm under the impression that some bot is creating the skeleton entries for the representatives - could someone perhaps get the job done for this guy? --Alvestrand (talk) 20:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: answering my own question - Cliffard D. Carlson was created in May 2009. Thanks! --Alvestrand (talk) 18:44, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Representative? 
Talk:List of prominent operas/Archive 1

message: The addition of Ascanio and Alzira must have been a show-off ludibrium. Orfeo and La Serva padrona raise more serious issues, discussed by User:Jerzy. Antandrus raises a major issue: "It does seem that "standard rep" is a dynamic concept, and what is standard rep in ten years might be different from what was standard rep in 1950." Absolutely! This aspect should be treated in a subsection at Opera, which I'm starting as a stub right now. Please go and help!
Can any Wikipedian append simply the number of CDs available to this list of operas, so that a reader can judge whether some opera not on the list is "famous" or not. 'Famous" is so easily assessed. The 21st century repertory is directly reflected in available recordings. This axiom should be in the introduction. Any disagreement? Wetman 23:39, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Opera|History and dynamics of the opera repertory]] (2004)

message: I notice many (perhaps all that have not been screwed up by people like me adding operas w/o having their dates) of the operas are in chronological order within author.  That's an amenity i expect in the author article, but IMO it serves little purpose here.  Wouldn't it be more useful to order them alphabetically, since for many of its users the chrono order is esoterica that they'll look on the composer page for, when they're ready for it, anyway?
(I admit that the date and city are so compact as to be worth the slight distraction, and premier cities of, e.g., Fanciulla & Aida are great fact-lings.)
--Jerzy(t) 18:27, 2004 Jul 4 (UTC)
:Alphabetical order is more important in printed media. On a web page, one can easily locate an item of interest by using the browser's "search" function. Keeping a composer's operas in chronological order seems to me to make more sense. - Nunh-huh 06:13, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm partial to chronological order by composer, but that might just be the pedantic residue of too many years of graduate school.  Anyway, unless the scope of this list changes there probably won't be too many operas under any given composer.  Antandrus 06:17, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of operas (2004)
Talk:Gulf of Khambhat

message: Is Graham Hancock really an authoritative reference? --Brunnock 14:09, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graham Hancock? 

message: It'll be great if there was a map of the gulf.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by John010117 (talk • contribs) 05:00, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:The Language of Empire: Abu Ghraib and the American Media

message: The quote is not a copyvio, see fair use. --Striver 14:15, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it is fair use, Striver.  From the fair use article see e.g. "The third factor assesses the quantity or percentage of the original copyrighted work that has been imported into the new work. In general, the less that is used in relation to the whole, e.g., a few sentences of a text for a book review, the more likely that the sample will be considered fair use."  The article The Language of Empire: Abu Ghraib and the American Media consists pretty much entirely of material from Amazon.com under copyright, without additional material by you or other editors.  Don't tell me to improve the article myself, as I'm having a hard enough time doing that for one of the other articles you added. Schizombie 22:11, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:United States congressional delegations from Maine

message: It appears that the names of US Representatives for the 25th-27th Congresses for the third, fourth, and fifth districts are in the incorrect columns.
* I've fixed it, o anonymous reader. Next time, maybe you could edit it?  Be bold! —GoldRingChip 03:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixed-up Representatives
Talk:Christian Democrats (Denmark)

message: The Christian Democrats have not been represented in the Danish Parliament since the 2005 elections. It seems the template has not been updated with the results from the 2005 election? If that is so, the results were as follows:
Venstre, 29.0%, 52 mandates
Socialdemokraterne, 25.8%, 47 mandates
Dansk Folkeparti, 13.3%, 24 mandates
Det konservative Folkeparti, 10.3%, 18 mandates
Det radikale Venstre, 9.2%, 17 mandates
Socialistisk Folkeparti, 6.0%, 11 mandates
Enhedslisten, 3.4%, 6 mandates
Kristendemokraterne, 1.7%, 0 mandates
Centrum-Demokraterne, 1.0%, 0 mandates
Minoritetspartiet, 0.3%, 0  mandates
--Jakob mark 14:27, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just looking at the numbers again, and it seems I was wrong. What must have happened is that Kristendemokraterne somehow got the 6 mandates that should have gone to Enhedslisten. Good thing I didn't just correct the template, then --Jakob mark 14:30, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/KJV

message: "to sort out expressions of community consensus and response to them."
:If this case is accepted for that reason, I think some things should be kept in mind:
:*The standard forms of generating consensus have traditionally been the AfD (where most votes/statements come from uninvolved parties browsing the list), and consensus on talk pages involving the contributors to articles.  Centralized discussions seem to achieve the consensus of a basically different group (I came into the issue via -Ril-'s advertisements on Bible-cruft, as did probably many other participants).
:*The limited consensus in the case  of the Matthew discussion was often driven by assertions that (as Radiant put in in the intro to the Matthew discussion), "merging does not lose content, it simply organizes content."  The language of "merge" was taken as a mandate to redirect verse articles to Matthew 1, etc., which remained unchanged (not merged in any meaningful sense).
:What role should a consensus in what is typically a policy domain (AfD, centralized discussions, etc.) play in dictating disputed article content?  Are contributors free to use common sense and/or WP:IAR to interpret policy such as "no primary sources", or is the intervention of non-contributors valid since it is to some extent a question of policy interpretation?  There is no question that the topic of Matthew 1 is encyclopedic; should AfD-style polls take precedence over the active contributors to a valid article?  I don't know the answers to these questions, but maybe that's just because I haven't spent enough time in policy discussions.--ragesoss 14:34, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

message: If I understand this ruling correctly, like all arbitration rulings, no content decisions have beeen made.  Thus editors are free to recreate articles on individual verses so long as appropriate consensus is reached with objecting editors.  If I've misunderstood this ruling, please correct me.   Thanks.
(Personally I believe there's an opporunity for a wiki Bible commentary.  Whether it's here or in wikibooks will have to be negotiated.)  Samw 03:10, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interpretation
Talk:List of Chicano Caló words and expressions

message: The article Calo (Chicano slang) is not a duplicate of Caló (Chicano) * DO NOT REDIRECT * There are reasons for the existence of these two separate articles, i.e., primarily the difference on the spelling of the word "Calo" vs "Caló"; and the former's desire to maintain a list of Chicano slang / Calo words and expressions while the later desires to "not" maintain such a list. These are two very big differences. Space needs to be maintained for both of these respective directions to flourish. Cityside Seraph 06:14, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NOTE

message: Since most of what is here is already in the main article, I propose paring this down to a list and renaming it List of Chicano Caló words and expressions. I like the format of Wikipedia:Lists#Definition_lists, but am open to suggestions. I'd also prefer a table, but those tend to be discouraged for lists, so I'll wait until others chime in before making major changes. Unless anyone has any major problems with the rename, I'll do it soon.--Rockero 16:34, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed rename 

message: There are many inaccuracies made by someone who is not a mexican spanish speaker, I will try to correct as many as possible. I speak like this in my everyday language. --GodEmperorOfHell 04:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Gee thanks.--Rockero 17:55, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who made this? 

message: What do yu mean by "with altered meaning"? This doesn't make sense to me. Perhaps an elaboration ot a rephrasing is in order?--Rockero 17:55, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification
Talk:HAL

message: I have changed the name abbreviation from Harold to Henry.
See Henry IV, Part 2 for an example.
I can find no mention of it being a shortening of Harold.
--JimmyTheWig 14:45, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_recurring_characters_in_the_Metal_Gear_series#Hal_Emmerich
Shouldn't that be added? Hal Emmerich, MGS Charecter. NekoKiyo (talk) 10:22, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hal Emmerich
Talk:USNS Titan

message: ;removed text :USS Titan (Star Trek) - A fictional star vessel in the Star Trek universe.
The Star Trek "USS Titan" is linked to from the USS Titan disambiguation article. surely there's no need to disambiguate this article, as "AGOS-15" is a Navy specific designation, and could not be confused with the Star Trek ship -- which has a different number. A user seeking that data wouldnt be directed here by mistake. -- CaptainMike 14:47, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The US Navy ship article has been correctly named, moved and re-directed.  Now the Star Trek USS Titan pages can be fixed by someone who knows about that subject. --JAYMEDINC 04:08, 29 December 2006 (UTC)