lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:RF (disambiguation)

message: It's unclear if Russian Federation and France really belong here, since it doesn't seem likely anybody would enter "RF" if they were looking for either of those.  I'm leaving them in for now, but if anybody's got opinions one way or the other, I'd like to hear them.  RoySmith 14:36, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, maybe, someone could appreciate the little RF in the French euros and try to guess what it is by entering it in WP... --euyyn 23:59, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Countries?

message: Radio frequency is the primary topic and should have this title.  The existing page should be moved to RF (disambiguation).  Does anyone object to this happening? SpinningSpark 07:33, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no one has objected, Ihave moved the article. SpinningSpark 15:30, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary topic 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus. No consensus after extended discussion. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 08:59, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: RF (disambiguation) →  – The base name RF is being used as a redirect to radio frequency, which is not the primary topic for the acronym. There are 27 different "RF" articles listed at the dab page. Dr. Vogel (talk) 23:07, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 July 2022
Talk:Bryan R. Wilson

message: This article primarily consists of attributed quotes which are presented as fact; this makes it inherently POV. The quotations need to be presented as such, with clear distance, and the main article needs to present a neutral point of view.--Eloquence* 14:39, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
Quotes are not facts, if properly attributed. All quotes as far as I can see are attributed, so it is well within NPOV.  --Zappaz 18:29, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While there's no question as to Wilson's notability, the article is not properly sourced. 2 footnotes are not enough. Ideally, every time a fact is inserted, it should be sourced. Read WP:SOURCE for more information. Drumpler 12:17, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Have identified and added sources for the majority of statements and re-written some of them where they were copied verbatim. Jayen466 09:41, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not enough sources
Template talk:Europe-royal-stub

message: I think "European noble" refers to far more people than "member of a European royal family", and therefore it would be appropriate to have a separate (though similar) template for the latter. Anyone disagree? KissL 14:53, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

message: I';ve removed the word "continental" from the template, since it also includes Irish royalty and last time I checked, Ireland wasn't on the European mainland. Grutness...wha? 06:35, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Continental"
Talk:Planning Commission (India)

message: search for "planning commission" dumps one to this article on India's Planning Commission.  The search should send one to a generic article (if not one already, there should be) or a disambig page.  There are probably articles on other jurisdictions' planning commissions.  also, needed is an article on Planning Commission (New York City)--68.173.2.68 (talk) 12:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See New York City Department of City Planning--DThomsen8 (talk) 12:14, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs disambig page 

message: Oppose - These articles should not be merged as they are two different bodies. The Planning Commission (India) article should stay intact and note that it has ceased to exist. The new NITI Aayog article should also continue to exist. It is not as though the Planning Commission has been renamed. It has been abolished. The new NITI Aayog has a very different mandate and charter. In the United States, the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) was replaced by the NASA in 1958. Both articles exist, as they should exist. Do not merge here either. --Hunnjazal (talk) 01:14, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not merge 

message: What does Aayog mean?--DThomsen8 (talk) 12:10, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The term in Hindi for Committee/Commission. The Masked Man of Mega Might (talk) 15:05, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aayog? 

message: Rudimentary economic planning, deriving from the sovereign authority of the state, was first initiated in India in 1938 by Congress President Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose,Atul Tiwari ,P Jawaharlal Nehru who had been persuaded by Meghnad Saha to set up a National Planning Committee  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.131.8.107 (talk) 06:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean?
Talk:People's Court (Germany)

message: Can somebody provide a good translation of the German version of this article?  --Der Sporkmeister 15:07, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of German version 

message: *16:22, 2 May 2006 Philip Baird Shearer m (moved Volksgerichtshof to People's Court (German): Use English)
*16:26, 2 May 2006 Philip Baird Shearer (replace Volksgerichtshof with People's Court)
*12:17, 25 May 2006 Philip Baird Shearer (Not a loan word)
*20:01, 2 June 2006 Kelisi m (moved People's Court (German) to Volksgerichtshof: It is most commonly known under this name, and not the English translation that makes it sound like Judge Wapner's TV tribunal.)
*23:25, 2 June 2006 Philip Baird Shearer m (moved Volksgerichtshof to People's Court (German): Policy WP:NC. Beevor uses it in , Berlin: The Downfall 1945, Page 74)
"Use English" See WP:NC#Use English words. Kelisi, where do you get your information that "It is most commonly known [in English] under this name"?
What is the difference between the naming of this article and the naming of the Supreme People's Court (最高人民法院; pinyin: Zuìgāo Rénmín Fǎyuàn)?
--Philip Baird Shearer 09:47, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page name

message: Lubbe is listed as having been sentenced to death by the court. The page for the Reichstag fire says: "the Leipzig Trial took place and was presided over by judges from the old German Imperial High Court, the Reichsgericht." Also, most of the people accused in this trial were found not guilty, which does not sound much like the workings of the people's court. -- 80.186.89.217 04:50, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lubbe? 

message: The section on the February 1945 bombing came from our article on Roland Freisler, but was inserted without cites.  I have added cites from that article to this one, and have also used cites from the articles in German and French wikipedias on the court and Freisler.  I have accepted the cites on good faith and have not reviewed the sources on which they are based with the exception of those available online. Kablammo (talk) 08:06, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attribution 

message: K.C.Lammers documents the direct reason of foundation of the Volksgericht in Goebbels TB 2/III, entry 9 Nov. ‘33. Specifically, Goebbels arguments against the communist leadership’s responsibility for the Reichstag fire were dismissed by the Reichsgericht judges, which he declared a reason to establish “a court protecting the German people”. 193.91.124.69 (talk) 19:44, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Direct cause of foundation
File talk:Reservoirdog.jpg

message: From WP:IFD:
*:Image:Reservoirdog.jpg UE, CV, NS, OR, OB by :Image:433px-Reservoirdog13.jpg whitespace not needed, character names could be put as text in footer.— Jeandré2005-07-05t19:18z, 2005-07-08t19:30z
**I'll support if you make a version without the whitespace and character names and put it in. Superm401 | Talk July 6, 2005 01:15 (UTC)
***UE — Jeandré, 2005-07-08t19:30z
**** Object.  You should start with the 468px version, and just upload it over :Image:Reservoirdog.jpg.  :Image:433px-Reservoirdog13.jpg should then be speedy deleted as a thumbnail.  dbenbenn | talk 21:48, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:GEICO 500

message: "1977 Davey Allison - (178 laps / 473.48 miles, darkness- caused by long delay caused by repairs to repair damaged catchfencing in a Lap 22 crash)"
Wasn't this the race when Bobby Allison had that spectacular crash?
AppleMacReporter 13:43, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1987 Event 
Talk:Prioperception

message: I believe this article was started because of a typo for proprioception. I started formatting it when I noticed the problem.
The only information that I did not merge with proprioception and Post-polio syndrome was the original author's personal account, which I don't know how to insert in a normal article. I am hoping that he will do it eventually.
PS: I am 18.38.6.195. The original author (24.170.181.166) identified himself as R.T. Mckeever. EmilioSilva 15:52, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Proprioception and Post-Polio Syndrome? 

message: Is this typo or neologism noteworthy?  I don't think it is.  And if it isn't, surely it has no place in Wikipedia?
In short, I believe we should delete the page "Prioperception".
yoyo (talk) 19:08, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this typo or neologism noteworthy?
Talk:The Hand (comics)

message: Confused -- is the Hand the same Hand as the one The Mandarin was in in Iron Man? -- grant 03:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. But the Hand has many sects. --Loremaster (talk) 15:11, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Mandarin?

message: The copyedit tag is on this article, but the feel of the text is like it might be taken directly from a comic or something--it's not particularly badly written, just has a storytelling tone. Can someone who has read the relevant books comment on this? --The Famous Movie Director 08:42, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: These issues seem to be have been resolved since the copyedit tag was removed. --Loremaster (talk) 15:14, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright issue? 

message: Hi,
There's also a Golden Age Hand.  He's in The Golden Age of DC Comics: 365 Days under February 25. Dawn22 22:59, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to create a Wikipedia article for this character. --Loremaster (talk) 15:14, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Golden Age Hand?

message: Why does "The Beast (comics)" redirect here? It's far more commonly used to refer to the X-Man under Beast (comics)... J'onn J'onzz (talk) 16:19, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously because Beast and The Beast are two different names associated to two different comicbook characters. --Loremaster (talk) 17:43, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This may very well have been the stupidest redirect in the history of Wikipedia. It has been fixed. oknazevad (talk) 05:01, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: The Beast

message: Doesn't this appear in the film as the retainers of the Yashida samurai family/keiretsu? With Harada as the most prominent member? (Black Hand?) -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:52, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Wolverine 2013  film
Talk:Ed O'Neill

message: What was Ed's number when he played at YSU? 2600:1700:DEF0:9260:58B0:CBD0:C07D:DE89 (talk) 02:37, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ed playing at YSU 

message: Ed oneil was in blue chipd 2601:647:682:4B10:614C:FC07:635C:43A6 (talk) 03:16, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  He was in blue chips
Talk:Funeral in Berlin

message: This article could be improved by stating who, exactly, rates this as being "probably the best" of the four novels, and properly attributing that point of view to someone. Uncle G 15:59, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avoid weasel terms 

message: Am not sure if the film and novel are now dated, I feel that since the Cold War has been over for more than 15 years and we are well passed the height of it in the 1960s and 1970s it is more "historical" than "dated". Benson85 00:10, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dated? 

message: The section about fireworks seems to have been written by someone who feels that
in this "more safety-conscious age" anyone would agree with the strongly stated POV
of the character quoted at length in the section.  It may be true (sadly, in my POV)
that this view has become more popular today, but it certainly isn't universal and the
section needs a rewrite that doesn't assume it is.  Note that the passage "censored"
could reasonably be viewed as defamatory (which presumably explains how Brock's were
able to "force" changes); I think it inappropriate to quote it in full.
In addition, the section begins with an imperative, which is not proper encyclopedic tone.
207.176.159.90 00:23, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fireworks dispute 

message: I too found the passages mentioned here objectionable. i have a 66 copy of the book, confirmed no blacking occurred. all the facts still need references, though. removed the language and comments that are unencyclopedic. plot summary needs expansion, and of course, would have to include spoilers, otherwise its not accurate. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addressing above concerns
Talk:Colonel Phillip Green

message: I have added a quality assessment rating and importance rating to this article. Feel free to change them as the article improves! Also, feel free to add more issues to the list below, and strike them out (strike) when they're completed. — OranL (talk) 00:59, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Ultimate Spider-Man

message: Nothing on this yet? I'd edit it in, but I really don't have many details except for the new Spidey's name that got released yesterday. Eticketjedi (talk) 18:09, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death of Peter Parker / Miles Morales 

message: It happens in the Ultimate Fallout #06 issue. I'm on mobile so I can't cite it properly right now. 71.197.196.100 (talk) 11:21, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  May and Gwen emigrating to France 

message: Does Peter really “die” in Infinity War? He is resurrected in Endgame. Would a better verb be “erased into dust”? Chickenmonger (talk) 23:12, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Death
Talk:YellaWood 500

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Talladega 500 (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#Talladega 500 (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 08:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Talladega 500 (Disambiguation)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Flag of Greenland

message: Ovbiously the Aachen design doesn't use the annoyingly bright and irreproduceable RGB green that's in the image.  I'm making a new image that's toned down to a more probable pale green, but I'm not sure if that's more correct than a straight Crayola green.  If anybody knows better please let me know. Dyfsunctional 13:57, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: RGB Green

message: The article states: "It is also the only Nordic flag without a Nordic Cross". 
There are, of course, probably thousands of flags in the nordic countries without a cross, but if we assume that the article means that is a flag that represents a notable geographic/cultural entity that has significant official recognition, this statement is still false. 
The flag of the Sami (Lapps) is officially recognized in at least Norway and it does not contain a cross: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sami_flag.  92.231.107.234 (talk) 15:30, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Could be good to clarify the meaning of the sentence, or remove it if it can't be clarified... AnonMoos (talk) 17:13, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Only nordic flag without a cross?

message: this would look nice Czechia2016 (talk) 23:09, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's similar to the design that lost in 1984... AnonMoos (talk) 14:27, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Idea

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Greenlandic Dannebrog and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 31#Greenlandic Dannebrog until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  eviolite (talk) 00:51, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Greenlandic Dannebrog" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The current image is not complete
The entire flag measures 18 by 12 parts; each stripe measures 6 parts; the disk is 8 parts in diameter, horizontally offset by 7 parts from the hoist to the centre of the circle, and vertically centered.
The image above is better. 87.2.163.187 (talk) 06:12, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Construction sheet
Talk:Technology roadmap

message: Suggest the author looks at http://www.ams.mod.uk/aofcontent/tactical/techman/content/rm_intro.htm   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.120.209.248 (talk) 16:57, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

message: Only talking about a software product context is wrong. Technology roadmapping is done
in other sectors (IC technology) and at different levels (programme of projects, e.g. ITEA, MEDEA, PROGRESS)
--Stephan Eggermont ,83.80.64.130 10:44, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context 

message: I have two bits I'd like to discuss and ultimately clarify:
# Do roadmaps really emphasize the uncertainty of the forecast, or do they merely allow for it?
# How do roadmaps relate to strategies?
--Jwthornton 16:32, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two questions 

message: This article appears to be opinion backed up by opinion.  Wikipedia is not the place to describe ideas that have not been published elsewhere.  I'm sorely tempted to delete the entire article!  Someone please give me a reason not to!   Nickmalik (talk) 19:11, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research? 

message: Returning to this article and not much has changed in the past couple of years.  It is still a long discussion of how to create a technology roadmap, with almost no references.  Wikipedia is not a how-to.  And it is not a place for original research.  In the coming months, I will return to the page and delete unsourced content, so if you don't want stuff deleted, refer to verifiable sources. Nickmalik (talk) 16:30, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia is not a how-to 

message: On a very quick scan of this article I see no allowance for the need to adapt the roadmap to change circumstances.  In particular if a roadmap is published externally the publisher may need to indemnify for the possibility of roadmap changes.  for example: [disappearance of Oracle Solaris 12 in January]
Note: I've actually come here from a roadmap (well lifecycle plan) discussion of Spacewalk (Software) and wouldn't like to link here due to depth of the this article.
Djm-leighpark (talk) 12:42, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allowing for roadmap changes 

message: I really hate the term 'roadmap' as it doesn't make sense in this context. I know the term is quite widely used but a roadmap shows you all the possible roads you could take to reach whatever destination you could possibly choose from whatever point you're starting from. What we are talking about here is a plan to take a particular route to a particular (technology) destination from a particular starting point (more like a route planner than a roadmap). Are there any other terms used synonymously that could be incorporated into the article? --Michig (talk) 08:50, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Batter name for this?
Talk:Adolf Wahrmund

message: Adolf true mouth? http://216.239.39.104/translate_c?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://lexikon.freenet.de/Adolf_Wahrmund&prev=/search%3Fq%3DAdolf%2BWahrmund%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D Same person? --Sourduck 16:30, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Petit Jean State Park

message: Does it make sense to mention Petit Jean Mountain as a link, seeing as how that just redirects back to Petit Jean State Park? N0YKG 16:37, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. It is against policy. Jecowa 18:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-linking through redirects 

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—76.172.62.228 (talk) 17:55, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There doesn't seem to have been much wrong with the coordinates in the article, and you haven't said what you think is wrong with them. Nevertheless, I've reduced their precision and moved them somewhat nearer the center of the park. If you still think the coordinates are erroneous, please provide a clear explanation of the problem. Deor (talk) 21:44, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: Target article is small; no reason for this to be split out in separate article MB 02:06, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a good idea to me. The CCC history of the place is well-told throughout the park. It is definitely an integral part of the park, not just a side topic. Brandonrush Woo pig sooie! 04:00, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 06:19, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[CCC architecture of Petit Jean State Park]]
Talk:Uniform Penny Post

message: These lks from what is now penny postage may be about Hill's picture being on them, and perhaps are irrelevant here.  Or are they from the period discussed?
* ==See also==
*Penny Black
*Penny Red
*Two pence blue
*VR official
--Jerzy·t 16:49, 2005 July 19 (UTC)
:Sorry, don't understand where this text was cut from. I've restored the links as all are definitely relevant to Penny postage, being the first stamps of that system (as per their articles). JackyR 00:06, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 2005 edits
Talk:Ottawa Marriott Hotel

message: Dang it. Are we going to have an entry on every single Marriott hotel in the world?  What, if anything at all, makes this one notable? jglc | t | c 16:53, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the sixth tallest building in Ottawa, for one thing. -- Earl Andrew - talk 08:46, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Then maybe you should put that on the article page. jglc | t | c 14:07, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes