lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Iva Davies

message: references and sources are stated in the section 'Sources'
:Perhaps, but that's not the way you do it. Your sources have to be indicated within the article itself. Look at some other pages and you can see how it'd done. :o) Vince In Milan 02:20, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: His birth name is Ivor Davies according to this but became Iva because someone in the industry couldn't spell his name correctly. Peter1968 20:24, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ivor/Iva

message: Anyone have a photo of him? US 71 04:17, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo?

message: Hey... Recently, at the Sydney Big Day Out 2010, Iva Davies performed one Icehouse song ("We Can Get Together") with Eskimo Joe... I have some photos of this if someone wants me to upload them to here. 
Clofts (talk) 09:04, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Iva Davies performing with Eskimo Joe at the Sydney Big Day Out
Talk:Heterodont

message: Where it says "The presence of homodont dentition (...)", is it correct? If it is, the following phrase makes no sense: "By contrast, homodont ('same teeth') dentition (...)". I'm changing it, since I posted this message eons ago and no one has said nothing. I hope it's alright. :) Asuranceturix 11:45, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The WikiProject classification for Heterodont is Start-class. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria. If it should be a stub, then please set  on this talk page & reinstate the stub tag(s) on the article page.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  14:11, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please confirm classification 

message: For some reason, homodont currently redirects to this page. A homodont is the exact opposite of a heterodont. I don't believe this redirect should be in place, and homodont probably instead deserves its own separate page. 
WellRehearsedWhale (talk) 20:43, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homodonts
Talk:Human accelerated regions

message: Seeing as how we can expect that there will be many more HAR genes, I'd vote not to merge. In the end, these genes will most likely have a lot more to be said about them! InvictaHOG 10:12, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge or not to merge

message: From the latest publishings by Pollard et.al. --CopperKettle 09:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seems there are 202 HARs now instead of 49 

message: This makes no sense from the article standpoint because it is implying darwin's theory of evolution is fact via usage of the word "evolution"...evolution is a theory, not a fact.  It's not the end all be all, and this article, of all, should portray such an element as separate.  Why not state there would have to have been 18 out of 83 gene mutations, instead of saying that we magically evolved in 6 million years from stuff that didn't evolve for 300 million years.  I am definitely not a scientist, but you can't post facts without putting it into perspective of all potential theories or none at all.  We don't have enough facts to turn evolution into a law.  I pose a request for people to stop using it (and other theories) as a law to describe other things which are facts.  Theories can never be used to define laws or truths (ok, maybe this might work somewhere, but definitely not here).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.108.3.103 (talk) 06:51, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This sort of question has been dealt with in detail many times elsewhere, eg. here. --Paul (talk) 18:58, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darwin's Theory of Evolution?
Talk:Elisabeth Becker

message: A German politician? That doesn't seem to be supported by the article. I suggest removing the stub template. 83.130.1.184 14:15, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the article, it's been stated that she fled the camp on January 15, 1945. Nazi Germany was still in power on that date. Why should've she fled the camp while she didn't have any threats? Aminabzz (talk) 15:50, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: the date of flee

message: Why is Danzig written as part of Germany in 192 2A02:C7C:E024:D200:870:C72A:E53F:FCB4 (talk) 09:15, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth: Danzig, Weimar Republic?
Talk:David H. Kelley

message: I have assessed this as a Stub, as it only contains the basic information on the subject, and of low importance, as I do not feel that many people outside of the field of the subject would be familiar with the subject of this article. Cheers, CP 16:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 
Talk:Guards Crimean War Memorial

message: Can anyone explain why this Crimean War Memorial article should be so overwhelmingly London-centric? Or why it should be regarded as solely a memorial page to the Brigade of Guards? There are numerous memorials to the Crimean War located around England, often close to military and naval garrisons. One such example being on Southsea seafront in Portsmouth, UK. There was an image posted several years ago of the rather striking Southsea memorial, yet it was removed, and the article was reverted to remove any reference to memorials outside London. link to the Southsea example. 5.70.56.16 (talk) 13:27, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, I'm not one of the article's contributors, but it would seem to me that this article refers to a specific Crimean War memorial, rather than to all Crimean War memorials, which would be the reason for its focus. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 22:51, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: London centric
Talk:Richard James (musician)

message: MySpace link doesn't appear to be working, but assuming it will come back soon, since it used to work, and is linked from http://www.gorkys.com ... M-1
update: removed myspace link for now, since according to edits, it's been broken for at least a couple days.
udpate: I believe the myspace link is appropriate because it's the closest thing the subject has to an official website.  The old official website link was dead. M-1 (talk) 04:58, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Philip I, Count of Flanders

message: It can be inferred that Philip was ELDER than Matthew, as it was HIM who succeeded his father, not Matthew. But in Wikipedia Matthew was always ELDER than Philip. Only the Russian article said that Philip was born in 1136 and thus elder than Matthew.Heinrich ⅩⅦ von Bayern (talk) 16:44, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth year under doubt
Talk:Toki Wartooth

message: is there really a need for character pages for any of the members of dethklok, let alone toki? there's barely enough information about any of them for the articles to ever be anything more than stubs. cma 10:29, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think it's fair to mention that usually when there's a Toki-centric music video, it's a upbeat, fairy tale thing. Mostly the Cat Dream song, his love song for Caroline, and Underwater Friends. I'm scared of editing, so I'ma just mention it here. 71.62.146.183 (talk) 18:22, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toki's music
Talk:List of Type 97 Chi-Ha variants

message: Would a better title be 'List of Type 97 Chi-Ha variants' ? Marasmusine 10:30, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Was done. Kierzek (talk) 17:53, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Hello. Just out of curiosity: why is this article not part of Type 97 Chi-Ha? --Chris.w.braun (talk) 18:44, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Due to length and there was enough information for a sub-article. Kierzek (talk) 23:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why not part of Type 97 Chi-Ha article?
Talk:Flag of Liechtenstein

message: ...use the FIAV designation for civil, government, and military land use for the flag , while the English Wikipedia uses only the civil designation .  Which designation is correct?
:Having read Article 19 of the appropriate law (Wappengesetz), I suppose the German and French Wikipedias are right. I changed the English article accordingly. Gugganij 13:05, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The German and French Wikipedias... 

message: Is the crown on the flag a copy of a real one or just an idealized one to symbolize independence? Timur lenk (talk) 19:46, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The crown on the flag? 

message: Crown position on construction image and actual flag image are off. Under Construction it shows 4 parts from left to right is crown but on actual flag image it is more around 4.44 parts. Bafelmauk (talk) 17:19, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The crown positioning on flag
Talk:Flag of Monaco

message: In this article there are four flags, but there are only three described: Flag of Monaco, State Flag, and Princely Standard. The last flag pictured, a white field with red diamonds (sorry if that is not the technical term)has no description.
User258 (talk) 16:52, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the Flag with Red Diamonds? 

message: Adopted in 1881 and it's one of the world's oldest flags?  It might be in the older half but is that really old enough to be noteworthy? NJHartley (talk) 16:20, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Oldest Flags

message: The same. Mention it in the article!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.62.21.230 (talk) 02:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag of Indonesia 

message: In Flag of Indonesia article, they list the exact shade of red used (#FF0000 in hex).
Here it does mention that it’s darker, but does anyone know the exact shade? Stansult (talk) 20:39, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I see here that it is #ce1126. Is this a reliable source? Stansult (talk) 20:42, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exact “red” color
Talk:Robert E. Kennedy

message: Is the Robert E. Kennedy Library at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo named after this Kennedy?—Leif Arne Storset 10:36, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Library

message: I think this article should be split into two articles, one for each man. --MatthewUND(talk) 08:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. -- Basar (talk · contribs) 19:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two articles? 

message: What's the copyright status of the REK, SJ section of this article? It appears to have been copied from another site.—Nat Krause(Talk!·What have I done?) 03:00, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think he is notable anyway, so I removed him. -- Basar (talk · contribs) 19:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright status
Talk:Flag of San Marino

message: I don't think this flag is similar to the one flown in San Marino or any other sammarinese flag flown anywhere else. It should be changed, the previous one was better.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecad93 (talk • contribs) 08:05, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  16 August Flag 

message: What is the exact source for the design of the 1465 flag? It sounds a bit Original Research to me.--194.113.40.62 (talk) 09:16, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  1465 flag 

message: might be of interest:
Schmöger, M (2011) Arms and flag of San Marino - recently redefined. Nordisk Flaggkontakt 53: 14-28, see online version--Sukaq (talk) 22:45, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  article about arms and flag of San Marino 

message: I added a small "blurb" on the municipal flags of San Marino as they are very similar to the national flag. --Mikeduke324 (talk) 18:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Municipalities
Talk:Flag of the Lithuanian Soviet Socialist Republic

message: The article says that the top 2/3 of the SSR flags had to be red as per the USSR flag but the bottom 2/3 could be customised by each republic. This is true of the LtSSR and LvSSR flags. However the RSFSR and Byelorussian SSR flags have a vertical design, the patterns on the Estonian and Tajik SSR flags take up more than the bottom 1/3 of the flag, and the Georgian SSR flag is a completely different design. If the article is to mention design guidelines then there needs to be a definite citation.31.185.179.17 (talk) 00:14, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 1953 flag design guidelines
Talk:Flag of the Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic

message: Is that Comic Sans?
:I was just about to ask that. Elanorea 21:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shaving brush

message: This article is a direct re-edit from a 'classic lifestyle' sales website devoted to wet shaving.  There's a link to the website down at the bottom of the article embedded along with a few other links.  My NPOV criticism here is regarding the anti-synthetic/boar opinion, which is unsubstantiated, and like the rest of the article, without references or sources.  In addition, there is nothing here regarding the sourcing of badger hair.  I find this ironic, because the article goes on at length over the various properties and grades of badger hair, yet fails to mention how the animals are hunted, farmed, and/or killed and whether or not there are any environmental issues to consider.  All of these failings add up to an article that violates all of wikipedia's stated guidelines for content (verification, neutral point of view, no original research).  I would support the correction of these flaws if anyone has the time and inclination to do the work. Strike71 18:52, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article NPOV, advertisement for lifestyle choice 

message: I've left one of the links, the rest weren't to anything specific to shave brushes. I'm very tempted to remove the last one as it is a link to a page of a vendor or (among other things) shave brushes, and something more neutral would be better. --Lijnema 08:50, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links
Talk:Flag of Gibraltar

message: Support the 2020 proposal to merge List of flags of Gibraltar to here; there's no need to split the content, as both pages are short; there is currently considerable overlap between them too. Klbrain (talk) 11:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Not quite sure it really makes sense to say: "The union jack is widely flown as a standalone flag within the territory" and to list the union jack as an alternative flag. 
It's not really an alternative flag, the reason it's flown in Gibraltar is because Gibraltar is a part of the UK, and therefore the flying of the union jack represents the UK, not Gibraltar specifically.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:3A87:9A00:3E28:B44B:8CBF:87DA (talk) 21:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative flag??
Talk:King of Kvenland

message: In 1230 - 1240 AD, in Egils saga - presumably by Snorri Sturluson (1179-1241 A.D.) - discusses Faravid, the King of Kvenland (source:  KVENLAND / KAINUUNMAA, 1986, page 73 - includes a picture of an old manuscript - Professor Emeritus Kyösti Julku).
- - Steve Wondering 11:16, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Another missing Kven king source added:  Faravid

message: Through ancestry.com and find-a-grave.com I can trace one of my lines to Fornjot "The Ancient Giant" King of Kvenland. I think that further support that he is real. Born is 184, he would be my 46th great grandfather through his son Kari Fornjotson, King of Kvenland c. 189-240. 47.213.156.125 (talk) 22:09, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Able to trace lineage to Fornjot
Talk:Jan-Carl Raspe

message: I have removed categories relating to people who have committed suicide as his cause of death is still highly contested. Somearemoreequal 10:48, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reinserted these categories. Your addition of the Cause of death disputed category is enough. -- Matthead discuß!     O       21:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I distinctly remember how some Norwegian wrote a book where he claimed to have been in a gay relationship with Raspe, and later his friend during the years after JCR's arrest, entitled "Kaere Jan-Carl" (Dear Jan-Carl!). This should be looked into. 192.121.232.253 (talk) 14:12, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal life
Talk:Flag of Republika Srpska

message: Mh. So, it should have been done by now -- has the law been changed? —Nightstallion (?) 11:09, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina on 17 and 18 November 2006 —Preceding unsigned comment added by PKo (talk • contribs) 18:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually the court has voted against the flag for both Bosnian entities on January 27, 2007. Here is the link: Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina ruling. Thanks, Vseferović 04:59, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the constitutionality of the flag I
Talk:Coat of arms of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina

message: The Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina on 17 and 18 November 2006
:Actually the court has voted against the flag for both Bosnian entities on January 27, 2007. Here is the link: Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina ruling. Thanks, Vseferović 04:59, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Coat of arms of Bosnia and Herzegovina

message: Is it known who designed the socialist flag and arms and who was responsible for the re-invention/revival of the fleur-the-lis arms and flag?--80.57.69.150 11:57, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Of course it's not true that coat of arms from Fojnički grbocnik comes from 19. century. It comes from 14. century and that symbol is found medieval monuments in Bosnia and Croatia also.--78.3.11.166 13:04, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fojnički grbovnik - 19. century? 

message: Coat of arms of Bosnia and Herzegovina (1889–1918).svg|Coat of arms of Bosnia and Herzegovina (1889–1918)
File:POL COA Pogonia.svg|Pogonia coat of arms (since 1434)
I wonder if the two are related? --Sobiepan (talk) 22:41, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Pogonia
Talk:Michael Lapsley

message: The article stated that the letter bomb was sent to him by SWAPO cadres.  The SA government is usually blamed.  Which is correct?203.184.41.226 (talk) 23:52, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't see evidence presented for neither. So how do we know it was SA.GOV? Or is this simply assumed for convenience sake. --105.4.118.51 (talk) 20:10, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

text: Nobody knows, no one came forward at the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (South Africa) to claim responsibility. It is assumed that the Apartheid govt was responsible because their operatives were responsible for many similar attacks, see Ruth First for example.Wayne Jayes (talk) 08:38, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who sent the bomb? 

message: The article refers to "1973...during the height of apartheid repression".  However there was little repression in 1963, as there was little militancy in the early 1970's.  The wording is also POV and unencyclopaedic. I suggest the deletion of the words "during the height of apartheid repression".203.184.41.226 (talk) 23:54, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: User:105.224.243.88 added a second instance of Redeeming my past this time by a different publisher.  What is the purpose of this?  My gut-feel is to remove the second publication , I don't see what value it adds to the article.  Wayne Jayes (talk) 15:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publications
Talk:Flag of the Republic of Artsakh

message: This is a word for word duplicate of what's already in that article. Why should it be separate? FunkMonk (talk) 10:42, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose they are different subjects, and this article can be expanded. Super Ψ Dro 13:16, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, since it's essentially the same flag, it is very limited what can be said about it. Also why there is a single article for the North and South Ossetian flags, they're just basically the same: Flag of Ossetia. In any case, if it is kept separate, it shouldn't be duplicated in its entirety in another article? FunkMonk (talk) 15:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

text: Oppose. They aren't the same flag, they are different. The article can be expanded and explain the development of the special Artsakh flag, for example, who's the idea was to putt that white pattern on it, and what it symbolizes? When it was adopted by the Republic of Artsakh? For example, Flag of the Croatian Republic of Herzeg-Bosnia isn't part of the Flag of Croatia article; Flag of Republika Srpska isn't part of the Flag of Serbia article. --Governor Sheng (talk) 18:19, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, as far as I can see, those articles aren't duplicated in full in other articles. FunkMonk (talk) 22:21, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding that issue, as  and I have said, this article can be expanded. And again, there are of course, political implications – is Artsakh really part of Armenia? --Governor Sheng (talk) 06:22, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

text: Oppose - They are just purely not the same flag, sure they have a similar design, why does that matter? The two flags deserve separate pages. If the two pages have different pages, and if you feel that the pages are too similar perhaps that just means that the Flag of Artsakh page could use some work, not that it should be merged into a different page. NDV135 (talk) 19:44, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Flag of Armenia]]
Talk:Segmental bridge

message: These bloody text boxes muck up the whole page layout. Can't they behave like pictures instead? MadMaxDog 10:55, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In explanation - I am trying to add a picture, and also to add sections - all these cause weird things to happen because of that stupid box. Having the section header lines go through the box seems the least of it. MadMaxDog 10:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Flag of Chechnya

message: For a few years now there's the black flag of Jihad added in (alike the red stars to many flags once). It's cut-and-pasted on the green field, in the oval-shape. --HanzoHattori 16:42, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "New" (not really) separatist flag 

message: This Wikipedia article states the Chechen Republic's horizontal bars are in the proportions 4:1:3
This isn't true. If they were in that ratio, the white bar would be a little thicker and higher up. Experimenting with ratios on my own and comparing it to the SVG leads me to believe that it's closer to 11:2:6, though even then, the white bar is a little too wide. 24:4:13 seems to be the closest I can get, but at that point, I question if ratios are the best way to convey this information.
I'm not sure if this is an issue with the SVG or if the claim that the bars are 4:1:3 is just incorrect, so I haven't made any edits. MinecraftMinun (talk) 07:02, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bars of the flag aren't actually 4:1:3
Talk:Flag of the Republic of North Ossetia–Alania

message: The article states that the width-height proportions are different from those of the North Ossetian flag, but the flags shown in the two Wikipedia articles have the same proportions. Mats (talk) 08:55, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be fixed then. Notice the difference between the two from FOTW: , . Khoikhoi 09:13, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I edited the North Ossetian flag on Wikimedia Commons (here), to be 2:3 instead of 1:2. It comes out correctly on all pages except in the thumbnail on Flag of North Ossetia-Alania, for some reason. Mats (talk) 10:31, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, try clicking here! Khoikhoi 16:38, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proportions 
Talk:MFI Group

message: "MFI has been famous for many years for the excessive frequency and length of its sales". Not sure what this sentence is intended to mean? Britmax 10:57, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:To-Mera

message: To-Mera live at The Pitz can be found on Veoh:
http://www.veoh.com/videos/v341344X9jFBM9j?searchId=5722009023925866282&rank=0
To Mera (το μέρα) is simply "the day" in Greek  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.60.228.210 (talk) 01:35, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Live Video

message: Fails WP:NMUSIC. No reviews. No assertion of notability.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 05:46, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Exile (To-Mera album)]]