Talk:Royal Moroccan Army

message: I am very concerned about the accuracy of the figures re this articles. I've seen different figures changing but none is referenced. Could you please tell us guys about your references? -- FayssalF - Wiki me up ® 17:01, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Figures and sources

message: Pour les T-72bv y'a une brigade qui s'appelle là brigade Russe avec que du matérielle russe performent ( AT-11 pour les munitions ) elle et stationnées en partie prés de la frontière Algérienne ( le profil du T-72 et plus apte a la géographie qu'un M60A3TTS )
-http://www.air-defense.net/Forum_AD/index.php?topic=8464.105
Potentially '6eme BRB'
Buckshot06 01:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you need to include the content into the article or just translate it? -- FayssalF - Wiki me up®  03:02, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Needs translation. Buckshot06(prof) 19:49, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Russian Brigade'

message: Hi i am --Hispania2 (talk) 11:05, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of Battle of the Moroccan Army 2006 

message: The purchase of 150 VT1A is already confirmed by many international medias...so there is no need to erase all the time the post.
As we can see in the link of M1 abrams, Moroccan GOV is already workin to purchase the tanks, is already preparing the know-how with American Army and the facilities, etc...
It is that enought to respect the aquisitions of both tanks and stop erasing it all the time???  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.83.120.23 (talk) 17:16, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: So show me those 'international medias'.  All that have ever been used as a citation are personal blogs, and Chinese propaganda sites.  Find something that meets the criteria off a good reference, and it will stop getting deleted.  Ditto with the M1 Abrams - Morocco is a potential[ buyer, but no money, and no tanks have ever changed hands, and no contracts have been signed.  Please stop adding it until these have become official - and even so, they would not belong in the current inventory list, but in a future acquisitions list. - Jonathon A H (talk) 15:07, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Addendum - Please look at your sources for the VT1A - None of them meet Wikipedia's guidelines for a reliable source.  Please, please, please read WP:IRS.  All you have right now is a bunch of fan sites, and second hand information that keeps getting passed around and creating a feedback loop.  If Morocco has actually purchased these tanks, where's the official Moroccan newspapers or other legitimate media outlet publishing a piece on the buy?  Where are the recognized Defense analysts and news sources like Jane's commenting on it?  Don't you think it's funny that all you ever see are links from Chinese defense blogs, and forums which copy information from said Chinese defense blogs?  No?  Think here... - Jonathon A H (talk) 15:13, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

text: Neither says anything of the sort. One says 'Estimated Future Buys', which means the vehicle sale is estimated, and the other says 'FY 12', which means July 2012-June 2013, which is also in the future. Discuss this on the talkpage and come to a reasonable wording, or you will be blocked for edit warring. Buckshot06 (talk) 21:44, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: If you only object to what's "on order" or "confirmed purchase" you could edit just that. You reverted other constructive changes. --Tachfin (talk) 22:17, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I was hasty. Too much dealing with nationalist POVwarriors. I've reverted myself, though removing the strange POV material seemingly copied from some government website. Buckshot06 (talk) 15:18, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but you are wrong, I'm not an a "nationalist POVwarrior", event if I don't understand what POVwarrior means. Some info, is true that I found it in government webs, such as history or others, but i'm just trying to get this page more useful and accurate. If we couldnt get to a conclusion you could ask before shooting, cause as you could see, I found a way to put our two ideas in common, creating a "future purchases" part, having both reason in our expressions. Next time, if try to read the full history before imagining the ending. If you realy can read French, try to read the french version of this page, and see the diferences, and try to read the history of page, and see all my contributions, not only in this page but in others too. Tabrisius (talk) 18:58, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I was not meaning to imply you were one of those who insisted upon their own Point of View though all indications to the contrary. I mean I've had too many run-ins with others (often on Azerbaijani Armed Forces) who do the same thing. The rest of my changes speak for themselves; I am not clear why the armed forces motto was here, for example. Buckshot06 (talk) 16:47, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I apreciate your changes, I think is better this way. So Thanks ;) Tabrisius (talk) 11:45, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  VT1A and M1Abrams 

message: See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaba_I
Reference used: Chris Cook and John Stevenson. The Routledge Companion to World History Since 1914, 2005. Pages 321-322.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tabrisius (talk • contribs) 17:32, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, I've seen that. Do you have further information? Buckshot06 (talk) 16:50, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've found this: http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field%28DOCID+zr0186%29 (Library of Congress) 1.500 moroccan soldiers fighting in Shaba I with Zairian "Army"... Tabrisius (talk) 11:44, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shaba I (under Colonel Loubaris? - operation Bonite?)