Talk:Neo-noir

message: I'm going to delete the examples Confidence and The Ice Harvest because I think these two films are a.) not really popular (compared to  most of the other examples) and b.) are not really praised by critics. I'm going to add Se7en because this film a quintessential example of this genre. --Wutschwlllm 20:00, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm surprised Batman and Batman Returns made it on the list. They both seem like typical Hollywood fare. I can understand "Batman Begins" being on the list, maybe not so much the visual cues, as opposed to the character development. But I'm no expert on film studies, so I couldn't really define neo-noir.--Fshafique 03:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples

message: There's been no case made for this merger proposal. I'll briefly say I oppose it: the film noir article is clearly designed to survey the entire history of film noir, from its aesthetic roots, through the first readily identifiable examples of the form in the 1930s, through the classic era of the 1940s and 1950s, through the post-classic years to the present. Given that the "neo-noir era" is well into its fifth decade, the current length of its coverage in the article seems appropriate. The neo-noir article certainly could be expanded, in order to provide coverage outside the scope of the film noir article: detailed discussion of specific neo-noirs and their interrelationships, a detailed survey of definitions and theoretical considerations of the contemporary field, the connections between neo-noir filmmaking and contemporary hardboiled/noir fiction writing, etc. The neo-noir section here might be used as a guideline for some of that, but needs to remain in this article to give a comprehensive picture of the film noir field.—DCGeist 16:05, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with that. KarlBunker 17:26, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I support the merger. The film noir article requires no detailed discussion of neo-noir but an overview. Interested parties can and will click to the main article (Neo-noir), which has long been in need of well-researched fleshing out. That's in keeping with the format of Wikipedia. Jonathan F 22:51, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What are those opinions based on? The definition of Film Noir itself is so amorphous that is seems entirely open to debate to state that up to the year 19xx is "regular" film noir, and after that year is this other thing, "neo-noir," which belongs in its own article. Rather than arguing that the Neo-noir article needs fleshing out, one could just as easily argue that it should be deleted as "such a minor branch of a subject that it doesn't deserve an article" (per Wikipedia:Deletion policy). KarlBunker 01:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neo-noir merger proposition (copied from [[film noir]] Talk page) 

message: I'm not sure if Neo-noir qualifies as a portmanteau because it seems to me that neo is used more like a prefix, or something external to the word attached to it so that it is not confused with classic—in this case—noir. I may be wrong, and that's why I didn't delete/re-word the sentence, but I thought if I pointed it out, a portmanteau expert could make the proper change if any is required. JamisonK (talk) 04:56, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A portmanteau? 

message: Seriously? do i really have to say anything else?? how in the world is this neo-noir?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.116.115.174 (talk) 02:49, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fallout 3? 

message: this topic is more developed on film noir and thus makes no sense out here on its own.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.207.35.246 (talk) 19:30, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I understand how that video game can be listed as "neo noir". It's a typical American psychological thriller where the characters are trapped in a difficult situation and make choices out of desperation or nihilistic moral systems. The ambiance is loaded with reference the 1950's as is the soundtrack. Mylochris (talk) 10:20, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fallout 3 

message: Now, as this is quite clearly an encyclopedia, I expect to be benefitted by knowledge upon opening and reading this particular article, I, of course, a disappointed (else I would not have written this). I will now voice a concern many different Wikipedia Lurkers have, this Article, quite frankly, doesn't mean shit. 'As a neologism, neo-noir is defined by Mark Conard as "any film coming after the classic noir period that contains noir themes and noir sensibility"'? What the fuck does that even mean? You've used noir four times, and haven't even explained the context! Forcing the reader to go and read yet another article, wasting even more time. Fix this, please. Regards, 79.68.146.162 (talk) 10:04, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some contructive criticism 

message: hello 31.205.7.7 (talk) 04:17, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello 2600:1016:B00A:B35F:AC5A:E4E6:62D3:79B3 (talk) 03:17, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  basic instinct