lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Anarcho-syndicalism

message: (I consider myself an anarcho-syndicalist, but I am not a scholar of the philosophy, so I'm posing this as a "Talk" question, rather than just making an edit.)
I thought and consider organization along industry "lines" (granted that such can be blurry; the IWW, based on past experience, solves this problem by classifying members as in more than one industry, when applicable, so it is not an insurmountable difficulty) to be a "basic principle" of anarcho-syndicalism (for the sake of brevity, I will assume that readers understand what this means, though it should probably warrant explanation-by-example in the article, if that isn't already there somewhere): is that not the consensus of movement pundits?  If I am (reasonably) correct, I or someone else should add that to the second paragraph of the article; if I am not correct, I'd be interested in learning why that is not considered a "basic principle."  
(Additionally, and this is perhaps more a matter of taste, though it does inform my view that industrial organization is a basic principle, I feel the article, at least the initial passages--I haven't read the whole article--gives short shrift to the theoretical rôle of anarcho-syndicalism post-revolution, i.e., the continued and continuing function of the industry-based worker organization in the post-revolution economy and society.  But again, perhaps that's "just me.") OlyDLG (talk) 17:57, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is organization along industry lines _not_ a basic principle? 

message: I keep seeing this same section popping up in a number of articles. Each time it's cited to the same source, that being Jeff Shantz's homonymous 2011 article. This begs the question: does this tendency actually exist or is it just a term coined by this one person that we're giving undue weight to? -- Grnrchst (talk) 09:07, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Green syndicalism? 

message: A very notable supporter of anarcho-syndicalism is Jacques Ellul, if someone would mind adding him as well, that would be kind. A. Jean Ness (talk) 16:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anarcho-syndicalism Sidebar: People
Talk:Honours of the Principality of Wales

message: Would I be right in thinking that these are on display at the National Museum of Wales?  Or are they back in London now? Deb 17:45, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not in favor of merging Drachenfyre 11:15, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Independent State of Croatia

message: Didn’t Italy own some of Croatia’s western lands? Why does the map show all of it under Croatian control? 165.234.101.96 (talk) 15:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: There is new scientific research considering efforts of ordinary Croats in helping Jews in NDH:
Perković Paloš, A., & Pelaić, M. (2024). Individual attempts to help Jews in Independent State of Croatia (NDH): petition letters by ordinary Croats. Holocaust Studies, 1–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17504902.2024.2320479
Worth checking. Mudroslov (talk) 00:16, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New research
Talk:Affine

message: Is that word "Scheaf" right ?  Some special mathematical terminology ?   Or is this a misspelling of the English word "Sheaf" ?
Thanks
Jake Moskowitz
jm -at- optonline -dot- net
* Thanks for spotting that; it was a typographical error (the word was embedded between a couple of "schemes" so the "c" just flew out of the fingers at the wrong time). Courtland 04:55, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling ?
Talk:Indigo children

message: Reverting vandalism is 3RR exemption. Tgeorgescu (talk) 10:51, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  3RR exemption
Talk:List of Brazilians

message: Should not also Sergio de Mello be added into this list? None of the categories cover him, maybe there should be a category of 'Diplomat' added Geoff97 22:34, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sergio de Mello

message: What about other TV celebrities, such as Silvio Santos, Cid Moreira, Renato Machado, etc. --Pinnecco 08:48, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV Celebrities 

message: Wouldn't it be better to change this from a list (article) to a category instead? --Pinnecco 07:29, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. -- Rudá 22:43, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What are the guidelines for entering names in this list?  There are 190 million living Brazilians, I am sure Wikipedia doesn't want all of them in this list.  Should we limit only to names with an entry in the Wikipedia?  It looks tlike there are more than a few "self-nominations" this list.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.67.160.233 (talk) 16:55, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What seems to work is that lists like this will have hidden text instructing editors to only add names of people who have articles on wikipedia, and that those articles indicate the person is of brazilian descent of some sort. If the name doesnt have an article, then they should be a likely candidate for an article, but the name would need at least one reference showing the persons notability AND brazilian descent/origin. I will, in time, get around to this, but anyone can do it. We can have both a category and a list for this subject, especially when the list is broken up into sections, and birthdates and other interesting info is added. this list need heavy editing and attention.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 20:22, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: there, about 2/3 done. this should stay stable for a while. sorry if it seems drastic, but when lists get this redlinked, it becomes a place for requesting articles or just unverified data. the "main" lists also need to be edited, and ultimately it doesnt make sense to duplicate the list info. It should either be a section here, or just a link to another list, not both.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:39, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change to category 

message: Shouldn't we change this into a list of lists, in the same model of the australian one, for example? LuizdeO (talk) 15:41, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change to list of lists
Talk:Swabia (Bavaria)

message: Notable people:
Please add Sebastian Kneipp
Because he was born in Swabia and lived very long time in Bad Wörishofen a city of Swabia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:D5:EBC8:CF00:E18B:6CA1:E5D0:8D4D (talk) 20:11, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

message: Marking this as a stub, since it really could use some fleshing out. uFu 07:32, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub 

message: Has anybody given it some thought to rename this page Bavarian Swabia? The current title seems precise, but a little akward. Bavarian Swabia on the other hand would be a pretty literal translation of Bayerisch-Schwaben, which is what we Bayrische Schwaben commonly call it. Whats the general opinion? EA210269 (talk) 02:31, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite right - now done.  (The German article is called "Schwaben (Bayern)", which has the same reasoning behind it.) Howard Alexander (talk) 18:28, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bavarian Swabia 

message: I came here to see where Swabia fits into Germany. There should be a map showing all of Germany, with the Swabian region highlighted. 
MarkinBoston (talk) 00:10, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a map
Talk:Arc (programming language)

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. It was merged and redirected to Paul Graham. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 02:15, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Survived

message: Hi. In 2005 this article was merged with Paul Graham on the grounds that Arc is a vaporwear language with "no publicly available implementation, no spec, no schedule for either" (see above). 
In January 2007 the page was recreated by Boemanneke, but the rationale for the merger from the VfD still holds true: Arc is still vaporwear. It still has no spec or publicly available implementation, and still has no schedule for release, and therefore, is still only notable in that it is promoted by PG.
:: --nb all of these remarks are false ~~Chief sequoya —Preceding comment added by Chief sequoya (talk • contribs) 01:49, 1 July 2009
Baring any serious objections I'll merge what I can from this article into Paul Graham and re-institute the redirect in a week.
Jorbettis 18:05, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're only creating work with this short-term thinking. --MarSch 11:02, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-merge with Paul Graham 

message: at first glance, I thought it was the end of the article, because it's only relevance seems to be to declare Arc the newest dialect of LISP. I assume it was lifted from the LISP article (where it clearly would belong). I'm going to move it to the end, but I think it should probably be deleted altogether. Cuvtixo (talk) 17:33, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is LISP timeline actually relevant?
Talk:United States presidential pets

message: I am uneasy with the inclusion of Nixon’s dog Checkers. All other animals in this article are limited to those owned during presidencies. Checkers was dead by Nixon’s presidency.
This got me thinking, since Checkers was owned during Nixon’s vice presidency, that we might want to research and compile a corresponding article on United States vice presidential pets. Details might be more scarce (particularly on early VPs), but that can be noted. Pets I can find at a cursory look are:
*Dick the Mockingbird (Jefferson)
*LBJ had a plethora of pets
*Shan the cat  (Ford)
*Millie (dog) (George H. W. Bush)
*Gore’s dog Shiloh 
*Cheney’s Labrador retrievers Jackson and Dave 
*Champ (dog) (Biden)
*Marlon Bundo the rabbit, Harley the dog, and Hazel the cat (Pence)   
SecretName101 (talk) 19:06, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of Checkers 

message: I'd like to change the existing table, primarily to make it sortable by (notably) pet type. There's currently no way to easily find all Presidents with horses or pigs or dogs.
To do that, I propose having the following columns
* President & pictures - would sort by order in office. Each would span the rows containing their pets.
* Name - would have the name of the pet. I think that some would have multiple names, such as "Him & Her". Each pet would typically have its own row.
* Type - would have a general type, followed by a dash and a more specific type/breed. This would allow for a sort, letting you see, for instance, all dogs sorted together. Or see all dogs that are spaniels. Examples:
** Dog - Spaniel
** Bird - Parrot
** Cow - Durham
* Notes - This would contain any notes on the specific pet.
It would take quite a lot of work, but would be interesting. But before starting, I'd appreciate feedback, as I'd hate to spend all of the hours doing it only to have someone revert it. RSStockdale (talk) 22:31, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think pictures of the presidents are necessary. But otherwise, the proposed changes sound fine. SilverTiger12 (talk) 00:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't thinking of pictures of the Presidents. I was thinking of the pictures that are currently in the table, although a few do show the President along with the pet. RSStockdale (talk) 12:07, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rework of table 

message: Apparently he had fish https://www.presidentialpetmuseum.com/grover-clevelands-fish/ Victor Grigas (talk) 18:10, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grover Cleveland’s fish
Talk:Roald Amundsen

message: I corrected "Spitzbergen" (the German name) to Spitsbergen (the international as well locally official name). Someone reverted it twice with the pretext "not an improvement". This is wrong: in the article this name is written once as "Spitsbergen" and once as "Spitzbergen". As a general rule any name should not be written in two or more different ways in the same article, so it is certainly an improvement to standardize the spelling. Explain please, why should it be better for this article to maintain this year-old flaw.<BR> Beside that, "rewieving" means to revert changes that <U>worsen</U> an article, not to forbid any content that doesn't come from you.<BR>
And second "beside": as long as an article is in Class C <I>("Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems")</I> I find difficult to imagine any change that is not in some way an improvement.  194.174.73.80 (talk) 16:16, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Both instances now read Spitsbergen, as per the name of that article? Martinevans123 (talk) 16:23, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, thank you, and no harm meant: I realise now that the revert was the work of some bot. With all the respect, but this bot could possibly benefit from a bit of revision: I don't think "not an improvement" is an acceptable criterion, especially when the judge is some piece of software. 194.174.73.80 (talk) 16:49, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well spotted. Please feel free to continue with "considerable editing ... to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems". Many thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:06, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reaching the North Pole / Spitsbergen vs. Spitzbergen
Talk:New York City Subway

message: A section should be added on the concept of deinterlining the NYC subway. 2600:1003:B13F:7982:8400:BC6C:8046:D94C (talk) 15:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @2600:1003:B13F:7982:8400:BC6C:8046:D94C Thanks for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to change it.  We encourage you to be bold in updating pages, because wikis like ours develop faster when everybody edits. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. You can always preview your edits before you publish them or test them out in the sandbox. If you need additional help, check out our getting started page or ask the friendly folks at the Teahouse.   Jeremyb (talk) 15:30, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

text: And through running and missed connections? Like the place the lines cross in East Brooklyn and there's no transfer. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 18:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Sadly, nearly all of the sources that talk about this are blogs or other self-published sources. I would support the addition of such a section, however, if reliable sources did discuss this. – Epicgenius (talk) 01:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: There is precedent-the 1959 switch on the IRT Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line at 96th Street, but it was not discussed as such. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 20:58, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deinterlining 

message: It seems like we forgot to update this:  Is there a way of having the month update with the text on Accessibility of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority? Thanks. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 17:55, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Kew Gardens 613, I think there is already a parameter in Template:NYCS const to update the number of ADA stations. Perhaps we may need another parameter, though, for the "as of" date. Epicgenius (talk) 18:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes-this was about the "as of" date. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 18:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I've added a parameter to  now. – Epicgenius (talk) 01:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of ADA stations
Talk:History of the Mafia

message: I would really like to re-write this whole page, as I don't think it really explains how the mafia came into being, and I feel that some parts are inaccurate. I also feel that re-writing a whole article is quite drastic, so I just want to offer an outline of 'my version' of the history of the mafia, here, so that anyone who wants to contest it can do so, and anyone who wants to champion the current version will have an opportunity to do so.
Here we go:
---
The mafia, which is not a single organisation, but a collection of organisations (think 'the press'), appeared in Sicily towards the end of The Risorgimento, as a response to the changing economic and political environment. Land reforms, anti-feudal laws, the state's attempts at centralisation and the increasing importance of industrial capitalism led to increasing tensions between the state, the rural elite and the peasantry. The mafia appeared as aristocracy-sponsored power-brokers, mediating and exploiting these tensions. By recruiting politicians and peasants, and by also violently repressing challenges from these groups, the mafiosi supported the interests of the rural elite, serving their own ends in the process through extortion and exploitation.
The Fascist era saw the decline of the mafia in Italy, immigration of many mafiosi, and the rise of international mafia. The fall of fascism saw the resurgence of the mafia in italy. These further events saw a change in the activity of the mafioso as old doors closed and new ones opened.
---
That's my outline. Perhaps some of you would like to discuss it, help to fill it out, etc. I'll do the article writing in a couple of weeks, when I have the time, if it is generally agreed that I should.
--Dan Luba 22:40, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write of article
Talk:Legion of Super-Heroes

message: Rather than many small quasi-stubs, could it not make sense to expand List of Legion of Super-Heroes members into a table?  This would also make it simpler to track where and where not there are changes between the original and rebooted versions.  unkamunka 02:15 15 Dec 2003 (UTC).
----
Is there any place in the article for a outline of the in-comic history of the Legion? --khaosworks 03:35, 24 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure!  I'd suggest renaming the History header to Publication history, and adding a new section entitled Team history or Fictional biography, perhaps with sub-sections for the pre-reboot and post-reboot teams.  This will mirror the structure I've been using for some other DC articles, such as The Flash, Green Lantern and Hawkman. -mhr 03:42, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Legion of Super-Heroes members 

message: DC has released a second volume of the 5 Years Later era of LSH comics.  At this point, the entire 5YL era been reprinted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.219.24.2 (talk) 15:48, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Five Years Later 

message: Were WP:PRODDED by . I have WP:DEPRODDED to allow the fate of these articles to be discussed here. ~Kvng (talk) 21:29, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure. Fate: merge or redirect (with some merge)? Or rescue, if someone can show they meet WP:GNG? Both seem very unlikely to survive an AfD. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:03, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: For a merge, WP:GNG does not apply to article content. ~Kvng (talk) 14:44, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: True, but most content here is unreferenced and what refs are here are primary. I don't think anything from either article is salvageable outside a redirect, but if anyone wants to try to merge stuff, I have no objection to seeing such an attempt. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:44, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of Legion of Super-Heroes items]] and [[The Legion Academy]] 

message: Can you create the page Monstress for me? Thanks Marvelvsdcvscapcomvssega (talk) 16:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Creation
Talk:Incheon International Airport Expressway

message: ----
The last sentence stated that this was the first modern, 4-lane highway built in South Korea, in 1968; but that honour goes to the Gyeongin Expressway (Route #120).  The Incheon Int'l Airport Expressway was only built for the opening of the the new airport in 2001.  --Sewing 02:42, 15 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Quorum sensing

message: This source http://bioinfo.imtech.res.in/manojk/sigmol/uniq_QSSMs.php records 5 categories of signaling systems - AHLs, AI-2, DKPs, DSFs, HAQs(, and 'other'). Some of them aren't included in this article yet. It might be good to reorganize the examples around the categories of signaling systems. - Whatsit369 (talk) 21:06, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganize around Signaling Systems? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Yp337 (talk) 20:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: The Microbiology of College Life

message: — Assignment last updated by Jason.DeLaCruz1313 (talk) 00:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: The Microbiology of College Life
Talk:Leo Frank

message: "His case spurred the creation of the Anti-Defamation League and the resurgence of the Ku Klux Klan."
Shouldn't there be an elaboration on this in the "After the Trial" section? This line name-drops the KKK but doesn't appear to explain why or how it led to the resurgeance of the KKK. If it's important enough to include in the opening of the article, surely it should be alluded to in places other than the opening the article alone? Horizons 1 (talk) 16:35, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a paragraph in the aforementioned section. Horizons 1 (talk) 16:49, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

text: This remains unresolved. Horizons 1 (talk) 00:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: +1. Also found this a bit strange 84.52.235.68 (talk) 11:38, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impact on the Ku Klux Klan Revival 

message: This article states that Jim Conley misspelled "night watchman" as "night witch".  Although it was assumed at the time by many that this was the case, it is inaccurate.
There was a belief among Southern African Americans at the time in a creature called the "night witch".   This creature was said to come in through a keyhole at night, get upon the chest of a sleeping person and take his or her breath away.  That was what Conley was referring to when he wrote "he said he would love me laid down, play like the night witch did it."
Whites were almost totally unaware of this superstitious African American belief, thus they assumed that "night witch" was a misspelling of "night watchman".  Of course, it was not in Conley's best interest to correct them, since he was alleging that Frank dictated the note, and it was highly unlikely that a Jewish man from the North would know about the "night witch". Jersey Jan (talk) 14:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Night Witch" 

message: It seems odd to me that the evidence indicating a consensus among historians is single comment from a non-scholarly news source (CNN). It's a low-quality source for such a strong claim. JDiala (talk) 00:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you read the entire article, not just the lede? Specifically the section "Later consensus: a miscarriage of justice"? Acroterion (talk) 00:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, right. Strenuously disagree (I think he was guilty), but fighting this fight is probably not worth it on my end. JDiala (talk) 04:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: What is your assertion that he was guilty based on? Longhornsg (talk) 06:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consensus of wrongful conviction?
Talk:Jerry Nelson

message: So will Matt Vogel soon be the new Count von Count since Jerry Nelson just died? -- 173.76.121.93 (talk) 21:51, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Only time will tell in the end, friend. --Smartie2thaMaxXx (talk) 00:58, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. But for right now we can still hope that he does, right? -- 173.76.121.93 (talk) 14:00, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matt Vogel/Count von Count 

message: I am confused by the insertion of a question of notability to this biography. As per WP:BIO, this actor "[...]has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions," appearing in more than a dozen major motion pictures as well as a nationally syndicated television series.
I have removed the tag; if you disagree with this, please list your concerns about the notability on this Talk page. -- Metahacker (talk) 15:27, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 