Talk:Texas Transportation Museum

message: this http://www.youtube.com/TXTransmuseum is the museums official youtube account can somebody post it thank
(yes I am a member of the museum)   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.179.184.154 (talk) 03:04, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  can somebody post my website accoun 

message: Can anyone tell me when TTM moved up to Wetmore from the Pearl Brewery?  I'm working on the TTM synopsis over at the Pearl Brewery article, and I found all the info I need from TTM's website except the date the Wetmore location opened up.  --Brownings 11:04, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll ask this weekend. --Amreatsf4620 05:29, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 1967.  --Amreatsf4620 05:41, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks for finding out for me John.  I'll update Pearl with the information today.  Thanks again.  --Brownings 10:55, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wetmore Rd. move

message: Ok, the changes by the non-reg member are getting old.  If AMRE has two websites, the simple thing is to list both, which I've done.  Please stop making changes back and forth, back and forth.  The changes aren't adding a single bit of useful information.  Instead, focus on another section.  Really, this article could do with a little history and background.  If you're wondering where to start, try answering these questions.  Who started TTM?  Where did TTM start?  Why was TTM started?  Does TTM receive any state or federal funding?  What is the annual attendance to the museum?  What's was TTM's involvement with Hemisphere 68?  See, there are plenty of things to write about which will actually add to the encyclopedic content of this article.  --Brownings 02:53, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: AMRE websites

message: I cant make the infobox work.  I added to it but but the new info won't show up.  --John 05:27, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunatly, the infoboxs are somewhat locked down.  They'll only accept/show certain fields which are in the infobox's master design.  So, fields like Manager, Secrtary, and Curator won't show up unless they're added to the master.  I just put in a request for the additional fields on the infobox's talk page here.  For now leave the stuff you added.  Hopefully someone will update the master and then your information will show up automatically.  Oh, I'll also tweak the logo size tonight.  The current size is just a little large.  --Brownings 10:57, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  InfoBox 

message: Take a look at this I found while sorting though some of the paper's archives.  Might make for a decent start on a history section.  --Brownings 20:51, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Express-News article from 1994

message: Nice cleanup work John.  The article looks much better and seems more organized.  I'm really hoping to get out to TTM soon to take some pictures for the gallery.  Thanks for all the hard work!  --Brownings 11:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This looks great! Glad to see a good ole' Texan like myself taking an initiative to post this on here! Scorpionman 04:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nice cleanup

message: Hey why did ya'll erase Alt.jpg, that other logo isnt the "new" logo.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by GEGenesis (talk • contribs) 23:24, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries, no one here is out to get you, or keep anyone from contributing.  If you look back through the logs, you'll see that the image was removed automatically by a Wikipedia Bot.  More than likely the image wasn't tagged properly and violated someone's copyright status or something.  If you were the one who uploaded it, I'd suggest that you ensure the image has been released into the common domain or properly tag it as a trademarked image.  --Brownings 02:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alt.jpg 

message: Several editors have removed the unencyclopedic opening hours, ticket prices etc. info from the article per WP:NOT#DIR and WP:IINFO (As explained in the policy introduction, merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.). Museum of Modern Art is a good example of an article to emulate in building a good museum article. feydey 06:53, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article cleanup 

message: Yes, museum schedules are unencyclopedic, as they generally do nothing to further understanding of the subject.  Readers interested in knowing the museum's schedule can follow the external links to its website.  Someguy1221 (talk) 00:43, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed they are, they're a violation of WP:NOT#DIR and WP:NOT#TRAVELGUIDE.--Jac16888 (talk) 03:11, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thirded (probably unnecessarily, but toward the establishment of a clear consensus); details of the sort at issue here are unencyclopedic. Joe 05:03, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC: Is text unencyclopedic? 

message: When I visited the museum last summer I was told that center cab was a 44-ton (am I wright in thinking it is even numbered 44) well your wrong! This is a GE 45-ton...check your facts. Your own website even has a photo of the manual which says "45 Ton 0-4-4-0". http://www.txtransportationmuseum.org/LOCO42.htm
Brakeman Billy 19:00, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any museum members out there?