lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Denominations in Wicca

message: Hi everyone. I have recently created this page and as such it is a work in progress. Please go ahead and contribute, but this article is intended purely to introduce Wiccan denominations and not organisations such as Children of Artemis or the Church and School of Wicca. I have used the word "denomination" over "tradition" because the word "tradition" has various meanings and there is no set definition, and the various groups of a religion are usually referred to as denominations. (Midnightblueowl (talk) 17:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Zero citations?  I don't think this article will stand on its own.--Vidkun (talk) 18:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm very sorry Midnightblueowl, but I don't think this is helpful. There are already pages which do this job, and this is an unnecessary duplication. As with your work on the templates, a major addition like this would be better discussed at a talk page before investing lots of your time and work in it. I'll link to the existing pages below, and suggest merging this information there. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 21:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page 

message: This article was proposed for merger into List_of_Neopagan_movements  and discussed here. It was agreed that the merger should take place and as far as I am aware the information has been transferred across. I propose to turn this page into a redirect to List_of_Neopagan_movements#Wicca unless anybody objects strongly in the next few hours! Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 12:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made the redirect. Of course if anyone needs to retrieve the original contents, they can still be seen in the History. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 17:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger into [[List_of_Neopagan_movements#Wicca]]
Talk:75th Ranger Regiment

message: Seen by some as an 'honorary colonel' for the Rangers.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2021/04/30/he-mentored-decades-army-rangers-94-hell-receive-medal-honor/
Washington Post, "He mentored decades of Army Rangers. At 94, he’ll receive the Medal of Honor." Buckshot06 (talk) 08:08, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Ralph Puckett]]
Portal talk:Current events/January 2005

message: 09-Jan-2008: The edit-buttons might not work at each day (some highly complex, peculiar article formats have been garbled). However, each day in January 2005 really is a WP article of the form:
:::* Article name: January_1,_2005
:::* Proposed name: Portal:Current events/2005_January_1
Refer to each day, using those article names. I didn't create this design, just trying to help others work with it. -Wikid77 (talk) 17:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: How to edit days

message: 09-Jan-2008: The format of article "January_2005" involves the inclusion of the 31 individual daily January-2005 articles (such as "January_13,_2005"), with all 31 articles stacked into a list. That technique is extremely simple, and should probably be used in other month-2005 articles, such as "August_2005". -Wikid77 (talk) 17:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Format

message: Any topics below are after 2007. -Wikid77 (talk) 17:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Topics after 2007
Talk:Full Circle (2008 film)

message: Was a difficult one. There's already a Full Circle (film) and both are documentaries, so Full Circle (documentary) wouldn't be a great option. Suggestions welcomed. --Dweller (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You should use the year of the film.  So I'd rename this one to Full Circle (2008 film) and redirect the other one accordingly (assuming it's not a 2008 film as well!).  The Rambling Man (talk) 17:47, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Dweller (talk) 17:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Talk:Ben Eine

message: This man’s name is Benjamin Richard HUDD not Flynn. He adopted the name Flynn after marrying a Jo Flynn but never changed his name legally. He adopts this surname  to avoid criminal charges in the name of HUDD. Please amend.  Also add long term heroin and crack addiction. 2A00:23C8:A5C6:1A01:4532:BA95:CCC5:A772 (talk) 22:46, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake on name
Talk:St. Mary's School, Kuala Lumpur

message: (Using their local names to distinguish the schools) This primary school was once combined with SMK St. Mary. SK St. Mary is likely to be much less notable than its secondary counterpart, and since they shared the same history at some point, I'm guessing it won't stand as a separate article from here.
So the problem now is, the current article primarily talks about SMK St. Mary, and I don't think the primary school should be integrated into the article like this, mainly because it looks pretty messy to me, having almost every section split into two subtitles "Primary" and "Secondary".
Summing it up, here are a few ways I came up with:
# As above, merge both schools into this article; the article name definitely stays. Article will need rewrite and reorganisation
# Only have a small section "SK St. Mary" (either section from History or new subtitle) to mention the interaction between both schools; article name will be discussed whether to keep as it is or renamed it to the secondary school local name or some sort.
# Have a larger subtitle "SK St. Mary" which talks about its basic info, like a mini article within this article.
# Google up to establish notability for SK St. Mary, in an attempt to create a separate article. This is, of course, a very good option, BUT the problem is right there: hard to get reliable websites mentioning the school, and biographies tend to not mention the primary education.
Whichever method used, the article heading needs to be fixed somehow, as well as the disambiguation hatnote. Surely, more suggestions will be appreciated. — Yurei-eggtart 12:03, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  SK St. Mary?
Talk:Tania Bruguera

message: To improve this page, citations for the categories "Exhibitions" and "Awards" have to be added. As of right now there is no information given as to where this information was retrieved from. - Blogger192AC (talk) 04:21, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Citations 

message: The recent edits and all aspects of this page seem to be coming together very well. the tone of the article is very well written and much like what a Wikipedia article should sound like. There is only neutral content, but I would like to see and read about different peoples opinions on Tania Bruguera and in what ways is she appreciated or controversial in the public eye, besides the small single controversial point already included. I would also like to see a lot more images or video clips on her work since she has done an extraordinary amount of service and art. The citations looked good and sufficient for what I was able to click on, and I feel that every citation that should be added already is. In that aspect, the article is great. What I would add is some different viewpoints on her art, her influence internationally, and images and videos.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fleming.sammy (talk • contribs) 23:12, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review of Draft and Edits 

message: moved unsourced laundry list of exhibitions and articles. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  moved unsourced laundry list of exhibitions and Awards
Talk:Tan Haoming

message: One external source "TRAGEDY OF CHINESE REVOLUTION" seems very opinionated and could be biased. The moment you enter the page you get blasted with pro-Trump and anti-CPC statements, which regardless of one's political opinions, should probably not be on what is supposed to be a historical article. Tan Haomin is mentioned only once in this article, surely a better one could be found? BonkeySmoke (talk) 15:02, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable source
Talk:Argentine Libertarian Federation

message: In accordance with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English), I would like to move this article to Argentine Libertarian Federation. The current WP policy states, in part, "If you are talking about a person, country, town, film, book, or video game, use the most commonly used English version of the name for the article, as you would find it in other encyclopedias and reference works. This makes it easy to find, and easy to compare information with other sources." Does anyone object? - N1h1l (talk) 23:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose, per precedent at CNT and lack of demonstration that that is the most commonly used English name. Skomorokh 17:00, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming this article 

message: I'm considering putting this article up for deletion. There doesn't seem to be ample notabillity for it to be in Wiki. Thoughts? 0nonanon0 (talk) 02:12, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notabillity 
Talk:Cytochrome b-245

message: I don't think that this should be a redirect to CYBB.  The Cytochrome b-245 complex is composed of two protein subunits, and to redirect to only one of those subunits I think is misleading.  Thoughts? AndrewGNF (talk) 18:15, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I kind of agree, but "CYBA" goes to an airport, and the "CYBB" text duplicates "Cytochrome b-245".—Leo Laursen ( T | C ) 19:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, good point that I noticed (then fixed) after your edit.  (Of course all four four letter acronyms should go to gene pages... ;) )  I'd propose leaving this minimalist stub there for now under the hope/expectation that a real expert will come along to flesh it out.  If you think it's too short, I can probably do some quick searches to fill out some content...  AndrewGNF (talk) 19:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  redir to [[CYBB]]
Talk:O. H. Frazier

message: Mandruss (talk | contribs), Pcfan500 (talk | contribs) seems hell-bent on having this article appear with an unjustifiable forced broken sentence. I even carried the issue to review by WP contributors and I see that again there was made an unjustifiable revert. Why this is being done can only be told by Pcfan500 (talk | contribs) and if that contributor should decide to continue with the disruptive editing then I guess it will once again be reverted and then changed to proper structure and the reverted etc etc etc. Pcfan500 (talk | contribs) can you please explain just how a forced broken sentence appears better than one string? Is there some type of "subject" related reasoning or locality expression that we all seem to be un aware? I seriously doubt that any English paper would be acceptable in such a format and this article does not appear to need some unusual format for its content.66.74.176.59 (talk) 23:10, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repeated reverts to forced broken sentence
Talk:The English Roses

message: The names of the english roses I know is amy,grace, and binah! so what are the other names? I think theres charolette because I have her card for the password! idk what to do with it! so can I have some answers? If you are NOT hidden under a rock you have read the english roses! unless you are 1 of my bffs!Destiny garms is  back stabing tarator and the jerkiest of them all. 
p.s.
destiny garms who is 9 has a crush that is Eddie Lorton  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.251.101.129 (talk) 03:42, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not a general forum for discussing regarding The English Roses, please contribute to discussions if you are adding something for developing the article. —IB [ Poke ] 07:37, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  what are the names of the english roses?
Talk:Dubuque Symphony Orchestra

message: There is no copyright issue. I have permission from the Dubuque Symphony Orchestra to use content directly from their website http://www.dubuquesymphony.org/dso/about_dsohistory.asp. I work for the Dubuque Symphony Orchestra and as part of my job they asked me to create the Dubuque Symphony Orchestra Wikipedia entry. We will put a note on the website that it re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain. You can find that note at http://www.dubuquesymphony.org/dso/about_dsohistory.asp. There is no picture on this listing, so I have no idea what the problem is there.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knoethe (talk • contribs) 15:40, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

message: I have permission to use the exact content from the Dubuque Symphony Orchestra web site. I am an employee at the Dubuque Symphony Orchestra trying to ad The Dubuque Symphony Orchestra to Wikipedia. Someone please advise me on how to avoid this page being deleted because of copyright infringement. Is this where I need to confirm that the text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License? Do I need to have my Executive Director confirm I have permission to add the same history to Wikipedia? Please advise!! (Knoethe (talk) 18:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've declined the speedy.  However, there's no reason to have material like this on for long, unless there's permission; if the procedure isn't followed in a day or two, the page will have to go.  Nyttend (talk) 04:50, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I've verified that  and  have GFDL notices. -- Whpq (talk) 15:46, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Largest United States universities by enrollment

message: From what source does this templates information come? What determines the order of the schools? --Eustress (talk) 23:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: particularly with the private universities   Astuishin (talk) 17:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't worked on the private school list, but most universities report their 21st day enrollment to the Common Data Set program sponsored by the US Dept of Ed. Those numbers are usually available on each university's website. The list is ordered by enrollment, but because there is no single source for the data that I know of, there is a chance that a university that should be on the list isn't. Also, I think this template should be renamed. We renamed the article from Largest US Universities to List of largest United States university campuses by enrollment to reflect that we are talking about single campuses, not national or multi-site universities. This template lists campuses, not entire universities and should be renamed. -Nicktalk 17:11, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: There is a conflict with this template. This template (according to the title) is a list of largest universities by enrollment, but the content is actually a list of largest university campuses by enrollment (taken from this page. Either the template needs to be renamed to reflect the campus aspect, or the content needs to change to the schools listed in the List of largest United States universities by enrollment. -Nicktalk 21:29, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename template or adjust content
Template talk:Cold War history

message: I don't know how I missed it before, but today is the first day that I have noticed this HCW template.  This template is really, really, really unnecessary.  First, we already have a main Cold War template, which already covers the history of the Cold War.  And those editors who are familiar with the main Cold War template know well that there has been extensive discussions about how to scope it and whether or not it is too large -- having this second HCW template really seems like a move in the wrong direction. And there is nothing in this template that isn't already covered in the Cold War infobox at the top of all relevant articles.  I hope that I do not ruffle any feathers, but I am going to be bold and remove this template for the handful of articles in which it is contained.  It adds nothing, and it clutters the articles with an unnecessary template.  --Skeezix1000 (talk) 18:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why, oh why
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-01-07/WikBack

message: Good article, but I think that many readers would be interested in some more information about the privacy issues involved. (On the German Wikipedia, someone tried to establish a similar external forum years ago, and privacy issues were part of the reasons why it was not accepted by the community and folded.)
The IP address and browser data of a Wikipedia contributor are considered highly personal data which is protected under the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. People like Daniel Brandt (who happens to be a Wikback participant too) have sought to collect and expose the IP addresses of several well-known Wikipedians, e.g. by evaluating IRC logs for non-cloaked nicks, or searching for edits where that person forgot to log in (this is what antisocialmedia did to SlimVirgin not long ago).
By requiring contributors to sign in under their Wikipedia user name, Wikback is collecting this data in its site logs. Now, UninvitedCompany is certainly a well-known individual in good standing, who, a checkuser, even has been given the capability of accessing this data in exceptional cases on the English Wikipedia; and a lot of people will feel more comfortable contributing to his site than posting at (or even just browsing) Brandt's. Also, from this post by UninvitedCompany, it appears that he is aware of these problems (I [...] have come to the conclusion that the most sensible policy is to refrain from any sharing or comparison of IP data between ENWP and other WMF sites and the WikBack).
But it has to be said that Wikback's privacy statement still does not address this issue in any form. 
Regards, High on a tree (talk) 18:32, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Privacy

message: Wikimedia used to host a forum like this, but as I recall, it was used primarily by arbitrators. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 23:47, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old forum
Talk:Clifford Township, Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania

message: Clifford, Pennsylvania appears to be the same place. See the town website link. Gimboid13 (talk) 18:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is a vote for merge. Dincher (talk) 22:28, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I merged them by making Clifford a redirect. Dincher (talk) 03:26, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clifford, Pennsylvania merge suggestion
Talk:David Chingunji

message: the article mentions he was killed in the Angolan civil war, in 1970, but says the Angolan civil war started in 1975?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.227.174.198 (talk) 02:11, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  timeline problem 

message: This was not a murder my gute is telling me he was held somewhere tourcherd for information and possibly brutally beat just because of his race and the time from it took place in so you are abroximently looking for a male in his 60 to late 80s possibly and probably survived has we'll 2600:6C67:1C00:EE:B97C:5825:60E3:6FC6 (talk) 17:31, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This was not a murder my gute is telling me he was held somewhere tourcherd for information and possibly brutally beat just because of his race and the time from it took place in so you are abroximently looking for a male in his 60 to late 80s possibly and probably survived has we'll
Talk:David Quiroz

message: The last name is spelled Quiroz [].  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.16.127.63 (talk) 23:09, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wayne Graham

message: From NCAA "Baseball Coaching Records" :
All-Division Coaching Records at four-year colleges
* 42nd all-time by percent (Rice 1992-2008), 787-299, .725
Division I Coaching Records
* 5th active by percent (1992-2008)
* 27th active by victories
* 22nd all-time by percent
Alphabeticalization (talk) 10:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Random Wayne Graham Records that might be useful later 

message: Could someone fill that in?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.20 (talk) 16:27, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  infobox is lacking major league baseball career
Talk:Debbie Millman

message: Change "Armit Vit" to "Armin Vit" Oscarlessthan3 (talk) 21:36, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 August 2023 

message: At a glance, I can't find any reason for this to still be a protected topic? CreativeNightPainter (talk) 07:43, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this still protected?
Talk:Deborah Hutton (Australian editor)

message: This biog is written in a very biased way, probably by the subject herself.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.68.140.219 (talk) 15:42, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An editor has recently inserted (and then reinsterted) a personal life section that talks about two personal relationships. I deleted it when it was sourced to one dodgy article (I'll come to that) and it has been reinserted with citations to four articles. One of these is a dead link, for me at any rate. So: to the remaining three: Adelaide Now, Courier Mail and news.com.au. First of all, these are all news corp sites, and they add up to one actual reference (all published in the same 48 hour period) - so this is one source, not four. And what does it say. This quote gets the gold medal: "In the interview Hutton fails to make reference to the breakdown of her seven-year relationship with hockey player Danni Roche". What embarrassing bullshit from some apology for a journalist. Note the one key word "Fails". Note the rampant POV of the journo. Who actually has no facts, and now, still has no facts. Silver medal goes for this "Hutton, who once dated former Australian Hockeyroo Danni Roche..." unfortunately followed by this: "Hutton has never spoken publicly about her seven-year relationship with Roche". Oh, and then the bronze for this: "Allegedly broke off seven-year lesbian relationship". This is rubbish. They have absolutely no information other than gathered by trawling people's bins, their kerbs, their ex-friends and goodness knows what else. If someone has a reliable source that meets the policy on WP:BLP, feel free to bring it along. Otherwise, I'm again deleting the section on the grounds of the BLP policy on "Avoid gossip and feedback loops" and the presumption in favour of privacy. hamiltonstone (talk) 12:47, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal life
Talk:Never Better

message: #Is it reasonably well written?
#:A. Prose quality:  
#:: 
#:B. MoS compliance: 
#:: 
#Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
#:A. References to sources:  
#:: 
#:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
#:: 
#:C. No original research: 
#:: 
#Is it broad in its coverage?
#:A. Major aspects:  
#:: 
#:B. Focused: 
#:: 
#Is it neutral?
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#Is it stable?
#: No edit wars, etc: 
#:: 
#Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
#:A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
#:: 
#:B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass or Fail: 
#:: 
Overall, it's an okay article. But, it really needs more references, and it DEFINITELY needs more images, with captions for each. (The one that's here dosen't even have a caption). Leave a message on my talk page when you've fixed these problems.Limetolime (talk) 20:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA on Hold