lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ernő Gerő

message: For my part, I agree. Both pages are very short: the Gerő interregnum article would fit well as a section of Ernő Gerő. The Gerő interregnum could then redirect to here. But, beware, the Gerő interregnum page is a member of at least one significant category, which would need to be preserved. I will, therefpre, leave this to a more experienced Wikipedia editor than I to perform. TheAMmollusc (talk) 12:07, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Gerő interregnum]] material 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: works by Johanna Granville. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:01, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Instructional design

message: On improving the instructional design article:
    
The article could be greatly improved with some organizational redesign, general introductory sentences in the lead, and flushing out some of the less explored details in the heart of the article. For example, in the origins section under history, there isn't a strong link between behaviorism in psychology and its effect on instructional design. Robert Gagné is also not introduced in the Lead, which could be helpful.19:17, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

message: Is there influence from ancient to modern military training on instruction design?  
There are military training books dating back to Roman times. 2600:1700:D591:5F10:5823:241B:346A:709C (talk) 22:42, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military training history
Talk:Chris Robinson (singer)

message: According to kate Hudson in Irish magzine Chris has some polish jew blood in him. Does anyone else know his back ground better ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Irishmonk (talk • contribs) 03:52, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ethnic back ground 

message: Ok, so I re-did the article to suit more of a personal biography rather than that of The Black Crowes. If anyone has any more info please add because all I did was a rough outiline. (Crowes.garden 21:35, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Now, Chris!

message: This is not the only "Chris/Christopher" Robinson that is a musician. The other musician seems to go by his full name, Christopher, which this one does not. Could we have a 'Chris Robinson (musician)' and leave the other as 'Christopher Robinson (musician)'? I think perhaps we should distinguish them by either nationality (potentially a problem in the future, maybe) or by genre. It's not like Chris Robinson is merely a singer; he is a musician beyond his voice as instrument. Any thoughts?--SidP (talk) 18:32, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: He is notable as a singer. There are a number of people in the entertainment industry with this name. Personally I think this is the clearest way of putting it. Karst (talk) 19:08, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation change proposed
Talk:Nyotaimori

message: Can we please get some actual history and origins for nyotaimori and nantaimori? Feminist critique isn't relevant to a wikipedia article. I was hoping to find how widespread, how common, and how old the practice is.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.79.61.198 (talk) 18:13, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: the currently used sources are obviously *not* of encyclopedic quality. In other words, the samurai claims are quite obviously pure bullshit if only because sushi in it's modern form (Edomae zushi) was created near the end of the edo period, several centuries after samurai infighting had ceased. The cizo.com Japanese source seems to have done some pretty decent research, (including documenting that before refrigeration it would have been just too dangerous to serve sushi on top of a hot body), and it's claim should be used instead, which that this appeared during the 60's in some hot spring cities where competition for customers in an soaring economy led them to develop various adventurous sexual services to lure them. --Jmdwp (talk) 20:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  History? Origin? Anything? 

message: The models in these photos are all wearing g-strings. This seems to be a Westernisation as traditionally a geisha would not wear anything on her body and while food may be placed as strategic covering these may often be the first to go. Biofase flame| stalk  17:08, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image accuracy
Talk:Zot!

message: Instead of linking to a nonexistant extry on The Golden Age of Science fiction, maybe it should link to the Golden Age part of the history of science fiction article?  I'll leave that to someone else as I leave it to others to learn the Wiki script.  Scott Dubin
Does anyone know the details of Dekko's storylines, other than Hearts And Minds? I am dying to know what his previous plots were. -- BBlackmoor (talk),  2005-10-29 T 05:45:30 Z
Dekko was an artist (Arthur Dekker, as I recall) and a friend to Zot's uncle Max.  He developed cancer, and had to have his arm amputated and replaced by a robotic prosthesis.  Unfortunately, the disease had spread, and over time more and more of his flesh had to be replaced.  At the same time, Arthur's relationship with his girlfriend began to fall apart, his art became more and more abstract and less and less humanistic, and he eventually became obsessed with the machines slowly replacing his body -- to the point that he started designing their appearance himself (hence the Chrysler building head).  I think his girlfriend died in here somewhere, but I don't remember the exact details (sorry!). Dana 03:41, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

message: I tried to come up with a way to add a sentence or two to the main article to discuss the bizarre nature of Zot's world--being stuck in a permanent retro-"1965".  Nothing sounded right, per Wikipedia guidelines.  Someone else want to take a crack at it?
SteelWheel 08:43, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1965 

message: I have a hard time referencing stuff, but a reference for the award nominations is http://www.hahnlibrary.net/comics/award/eisner.php  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Setitup (talk • contribs) 01:16, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Award references 
Talk:O-mikuji

message: I do not mean any disrespect to the author of this page, but in my two years of visiting Japanese temples, I never encountered an omikuji that functioned in the fashion described (the fortune, rolled up, falls from the hole). In my experience, a stick is removed from the box instead, bearing a number. This number corresponds to a drawer in a cabinet, which contains the appropriate paper slip.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.102.54 (talk) 10:18, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed that "falls from the hole" thing too and removed it. While it may be like that at some shrines, I've never seen it. But you can get your omikuji in many different ways. Drcwright (talk) 05:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccuracy regarding obtaining of slip

message: I have never encountered omikuji that costs just 5 yen. Every shrine I have visited asks for 100 yen. Even the omukuji vending machines used on this article have "100 Yen Coins Only" written on them. Is there a citation for the 5-yen donation being widespread?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.216.30.67 (talk) 02:32, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Cost
Talk:TT

message: moved from artcile page: Dubious entry i live in the uk and watch this program frequently and have never heard this term used for it
(unsigned but from Plugwash)
:It is not uncommonly referred to as this on its forum and the mailing list of forum friends (neither notable enough for articles of their own). If others feel it doesn't merit an entry here, then feel free to remove it, I won't revert. Being an active contributor to the forum and mailing list, I'm not in a good position to judge its wider useage. Thryduulf 15:56, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Time Team]] entry

message: Isn't the proper term 'Smiley'?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.113.50.32 (talk) 23:51, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chat Icon?
Template talk:No license

message: For some reason I interpreted this phrase in the template as asking for the identity of the copyright holder. I would suggest it be changed to say something like "Unless a public domain or fair use claim is provided...", if that is what is intended.  Gimmetrow 15:41, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template text: Unless the copyright status is provided... 

message: Please edit the template so  is instead . -- tariqabjotu 02:19, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd prefer to keep the current wording rather than have two exact dates, but if this charge is made, it must be +8, not +7. ×Meegs 03:56, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This wouldn't change the image will be deleted seven days after this template was added (  2006).; it would instead change Also consider adding  to the image captions, which is currently incorrect because 10-09-2006 (10-09-2006) is not the same as 2006-09-10 (2006-09-10). I suppose I could change , but all that does is use the  template, as I suggested above (albeit incorrectly). -- tariqabjotu 09:13, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, right.  I've made the change here and to .  already had it. I used +7 since it's better that people think they have less time than they really do than more. Thanks. ×Meegs 17:36, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Request 

message: :Plz, add ru-wiki ru:Шаблон:No license. Alex Spade 13:58, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done --ais523 14:00, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Tra (Talk) 13:01, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interwiki
Talk:Postal order

message: This the correct spelling, with a capital O. See talk page of 'Postal order'
I intend to revert this page and make 'Postal order' the redirector.
Lincolnshire Poacher 16:57, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This should be merged with Postal Orders of Great Britain. - (Aidan Work 10:20, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears from the article that postal orders are not exclusive to Great Britain. Hu 06:13, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

text: I disagree with the merge suggestion. The Postal Orders article is about Postal Orders in general but the Postal Orders of Great Britain is specific to that country and if expanded can be a great article in its own right just like the Postal Orders of Ireland already is. It would a waste of time to merge and then have to de-merge later. If the merge should take place then the logic is that you should also merge the Postal Orders of Ireland into the general article too. I don't think there is any viability in that. ww2censor 14:23, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm untagging this as there has been no recent interest, none since 2006 and no consensus. ww2censor (talk) 12:51, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Can someone please fix the external link, which depicts some Malaysian postal orders? - (203.211.79.176 23:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Please fix the external link

message: It was a safe method in times past, but nowadays offers very little advantage over cheques or electronic funds transfer.
Very little advantage? I'd say it offers one absolutely huge advantage over these methods if you're under 16 and/or (shock! horror!) don't have a bank account, namely that it's actually possible. 217.155.20.163 (talk) 22:53, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advantages? 

message: The article mentions only something no longer in use, but postal money orders are still in use here today.Bill (talk) 03:04, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Canada
Talk:San Lorenzo fuori le mura

message: The other articles on Italian basilicas use their proper Italian names because they are known by their Italian names, even by English-speaking people: Basilica di Santa Maria Maggiore, Basilica di San Giovanni in Laterano, Basilica Palladiana, Basilica della Santissima Annunziata di Firenze, Basilica di San Lorenzo di Firenze, Basilica di San Miniato al Monte, Basilica di San Zanipolo, Basilica di Santa Croce di Firenze, Basilica di Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari, Basilica di Santa Maria Novella, Basilica di Santa Maria della Salute.  That establishes precedence to move this article to the proper title with a redirect from its more uncommonly used English translation.  --Gerald Farinas 18:23, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Are the deaths of the seven workers who accidentally saw the body of St. Lawrence according to a letter from Gregory the Great to the Empress Constantina related to Pelagius's work with San Lorenzo fuori le Mura? The letter in question merely suggests that Pelagius had ordered "improvements" to be made when the accident occurred and the workers died. 128.6.30.197 (talk) 05:17, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  San Lorenzo and a Letter from Gregory the Great? 

message: Why was this basilica "demoted" to a minor basilica? Many of the basilica articles relating to the Pope mention this basilica, but not why it is no longer part of the Pentarchy (even Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem does not mention it).  What happened, when and why? 71.234.215.133 (talk) 11:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Until Benedict XVI, there were 4 major basilicas. All the others were ipso facto "minor basilicas". Benedict XVI’s theological act of renouncing the  title of "Patriarch of the West"  had as consequence that Roman Catholic patriarchal basilicas are today officially known as Papal (Major or Minor) basilicas. In the case of San Lorenzo, it should read "Papal minor basilica" as strict denomination. See here for a full list: . I modified the page accordingly. Alberto Fernandez Fernandez (talk) 12:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor basilica 

message: In the article on Pope St. Hilary it is mentioned that he is buried in this church.  If this is so, shouldn't this be mentioned in the section on burials? Caeruleancentaur (talk) 12:43, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pope St. Hilary 
Talk:Pathfinder International

message: Thanks a bunch to  User:lotsofissues for starting starting this article about us.  I work for Pathfinder, and as such I'm disinclined to start or edit the article about us.  I posted a request for someone to start the article, and now someone has.  
I would still like to encourage further development of the article.  
* If anyone's ever interested in doing so and I can help them in any way, please contact bnardone@pathfind.org, or leave me a message  on my talk page.  Email's probably the better bet, as I don't check this site very often.
-:)Pfwebadmin 16:59, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks for starting this article.
Category talk:Irish mathematicians

message: I've included the "British Isles" template here because some mathematicians counted as "Irish" were born in what is now the Republic of Ireland at a time when it was part of the UK, and indeed some were UK citizens all their life. Northern Ireland may present a problem later; see the talk page for Template:British Isles mathematicians for suggestions on that. VivaEmilyDavies 17:03, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Maury Maverick

message: I have removed a claim that Vice President John Nance Garner supported liberalism and civil rights.  There is no citation for this claim.  All that one can get from the Web is that he opposed FDR's deficit spending and court packing. 
In general, this article is in serious need of documentation for its claims. Dogru144 17:09, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Garner's supposed liberalism
Talk:Aeronca Aircraft

message: Kindly set the image to a more manageable size? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.218.222.31 (talk • contribs) 17:19, 11 April 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems that there's a distinct lack of Wikipedia articles about individual Aeronca aircraft types. Given their importance in U.S. civil aircraft history, surely the Champ and Chief deserve their own articles. Is anybody already working on this? If not, I might be willing to take up the challenge. Carguychris 15:28, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am a previous owner of an Aeronca chief, and will begin working on an article for it. Shoe1127 18:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

text: The copy of Jane's that I have includes stats for three Aeroncas - the L-3 Grasshopper, Model 65 Super-Chief, and Defender. The L-3 already is pretty set, but I'll get the others typed up shortly and start some stubs. ericg ✈ 03:53, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

text: On this note, it would really seem that information about the particular models has taken over this article--which seems to be the same thing once in light detail and then repeated in a little more detail.  Maybe I'm thinking about this the wrong way, but I would think the article should focus more on details of the corporation and its history, leaving the details of particular aircraft to articles on each design.  There's a lot about the company that just doesn't come up here--their various locations, the reasons for some of the moves (flood, etc.), the name change.  Can anyone offer some wisdom on this?  I don't want to just start hacking away.  SkipperPilot 19:09, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

text: No, you're absolutely right. This isn't the place for anything more than a list of aircraft. Hack away! ericg ✈ 22:31, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks.  I think I'm going to start at the top, add and incorporate where appropriate, then cut.  SkipperPilot 01:17, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good. I already duplicated the Aeronca C-2 at its own page - I'll start work on a table of models much like that at List of Lockheed aircraft in a bit. ericg ✈ 05:37, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individual Aeronca aircraft types 
Talk:List of Chinese musicians

message: Ambiguous as it stands Paul foord 14:06, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are these ethnic chinese or musicians of China? 

message: the Chinese singers is so great my eyes can pielout when IAM starting to lissten too them@ 41.116.184.118 (talk) 09:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yeah they are
Talk:Business oligarch

message: To my knowledge, the term "(business) oligarch" has been an exclusively post-Soviet  phenomemnon. Not without similarities to other countries, but also with unique history and circumstances: lightning-fast (in historical scale) robbing a huge country into private hands of few.
If the term acquired a more general application over last 20 years, this must be thoroughly documented. Ralph Saroyan (talk) 16:10, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  My deletion of large text 

message: ol·i·gar·chy
/ˈäləˌɡärkē/
noun
noun: oligarchy; plural noun: oligarchies
    a small group of people having control of a country, organization, or institution.
    "the ruling oligarchy of military men around the president"
        a country governed by an oligarchy.
        "the English aristocratic oligarchy of the 19th century"
        government by an oligarchy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.44.156.130 (talk) 01:43, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  An "Oligarch" is a member of an "Oligarchy".  Has nothing to do with "Business" or being a "Business Magnate".  

message: Surely oligarch is just another name for MAFIA 51.6.43.1 (talk) 11:35, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oligarch
Talk:Shebang

message: It's unfortunate whenever an article gets caught up in the Unix/Linux flamewars (as this article seems to be trending). We've now actually gone through several iterations of whether bash belongs to Unix, Linux, or both. Personally, because bytes are cheap, I preferred the version that included both and let the reader choose which link to follow, but someone else changed that recently.
What does everyone else think? Should bash be followed by just Unix, just Linux, or both?
Atlant 17:41, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: bash was also default on BeOS -before- it was guaranteed to be the default on a Linux box. I remember Linux distros with tcsh as default in the early days, for instance. So its not Linux only. I also have it run, as a later option, as default on my IRIX and NetBSD machines, and its an extremely portable programme. --Kiand 20:16, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boring Unix/Linux wars 

message: Note that (as pointed out in the book "Classic Shell Scripting" by Robbins and Beebe) that some [admitedly obscure] systems look for "#! /" (pound, bang, space, slash) to trigger invocation of programs.  And no extant system is bothered by a space after the bang.  So for portability you'd want
 #! /bin/sh
for an sh invocation you'd really want
 #! /bin/sh -
to keep user options to the script from being taken as options to sh.
Nahaj 17:44, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  space 

message: The links for the etymology of Shebang from char-a-banc are very questionable.  The first link states "other sources suggest a derivation from French char-a-banc..." but don't list these sources.  The second link doesn't mention char-a-banc.  Without sources for the proposed etymology, the "suspected origination" in the article should be removed.    68.195.209.181 03:48, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shebang etymology 

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 06:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message
Talk:Blaník

message: Let's move this page to Blaník: the ISO-8859-1 character set, which is the limiting factor of article titles, does contain the "í" character. -- Sandius 17:45, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Blaník 

message: WHICH 'newly built theatre'? It seems to have gone through several such renewals. Bluedawe 02:30, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: All original foundation stones can still be seen in the exhibition in the basement of the National Theatre. Yes, it burned down once on 12 August 1881 and fire destroyed copper dome, auditorium and stage of the theatre, but was rebuilt again. In the exhibition is also a white marble plaque by Czech expatriates from Chicago with the inscription "What blood binds, the sea does not divide", which however did not arrive until 1871.1 Jirka.h23 (talk) 12:08, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stone from Blaník included in newly built theatre..?