lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Miloš Jakeš

message: his name is Milouš, not Miloš!!! --213.235.102.135 15:53, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Am I the only one who is wondering what is such a section doing in a serious encyclopedia article? --- Sandius 19:42, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would definitely keep the current text, I do nor remember any other speach of communist leader that was distributed as pirate casette tape copy among the citizens, turned into a dance song etc. Maybe the section could be renamed "Trivia" and moved to the end of the article. JanSuchy 05:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am definitely for keeping the section. It describes an important cultural phenomena in the period around the Velvet Revolution. --pabouk 09:27, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Target of jokes" section 

message: From the article: "official Czech pop music singers when pointing to their allegedly super-high incomes (None of us earns so much!). "
1) What is an "official Czech pop music singer"?
2) Is the "None of us earns so much!" a quote from this man? It looks like something a vandal has snuck into the article.
--Khajidha (talk) 11:44, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree this is misuse of "official" but it probably refers to the "state-endorsed" artists as opposed to the underground scenes. In those times pop music was regulated by the state. As for the quote, yes, he did say it, it's in the video – "Žádnej z nás nebere takový platy, prostě, jako berou oni". The English translation doesn't quite capture the implied smirk at him for using Common Czech rather than speaking formally. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  09:48, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two questions 

message: I've just removed a load of unsourced, controversial stuff from this article. This is a WP:BLP and it was in an absolutely terrible state. Anything returned should be properly referenced. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  09:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP
Talk:Nikolai Fyodorov (philosopher)

message: **What's with the spelling???—Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 11:57, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
***If Poles and Turks can, why Russians cannot? :-) mikka (t) 15:44, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved from Russian Portal board

message: :—Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.136.22.172 (talk • contribs) 
::Yes until we can revive him. Date of death listed Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 21:25, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  so, is he dead
Talk:Irish Republican Army (1922–1969)

message: Hey everyone I just currently added additional information to the Post-WWII IRA section, though I added a significant amount of information there still could be improvements made. For example, there could be more information added to the power vacuum the IRA experienced during this time period. Furthermore, I think there could be more information added to the Border campaign and traditionalist nationalism. I'm interested to see how this wiki page improves in the coming months. 130.74.163.250 (talk) 19:30, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding information to The Post-WWII IRA section 

message: The above section in the article is inaccurate and ahistorical. Yes there was an emerging band of fascists in the IRA at the time however these were one of many factions within the IRA, the others being the Communists, the Liberals and the Conservatives. The IRA had a smorgasbord of ideologies at this time, of which fascism was one of many and in fact was a minority position.PailSimon (talk) 11:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed or amended various headings, including that one. I have no objection to them being restored with a more neutral wording if deemed necessary. I realise some content may still need to be added to the Russell section that contained that one. FDW777 (talk) 11:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ideological shift to the hard right"
Talk:Vail, Colorado

message: I'm working on replacing the Vail locator map with the map of Eagle County at the right.  It looks right in Konqueror, Mozilla, and Internet Explorer.  How about other browsers?  dbenbenn | talk 00:51, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: And why is their bearly anything about skiing? Banana04131 17:34, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Oldest messages

message: What does everyone think about splitting the ski resort and town into two separate articles? Jameschipmunk 22:01, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ski/Town split

message: Hello all,
I've been one to argue about external links and whether or not they should be included in articles. That being said, I figured I'd pose my argument before anyone deleted a new link. 
I'd like to add VailPM.com to Vail's external links. The site is a huge resource for the entire Vail Valley. It contains an interactive directory of all the businesses and goings on in and around Vail, as well as a constantly updated calendar, photos and video from around town, and a forum for users to discuss the Valley. The site is extremely useful for both locals and visitors alike, and I think it would be a great addition for those looking to learn about Vail and the Vail Valley. I'm going to add the link now, and if anyone doesn't agree I'd be happy to discuss. 
Thanks!
Searles2sels (PJ) 16:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of External Link 

message: The "Stay" section consists only of this: Exclusive Vail Rentals [1] provides luxury vacation home rentals throughout Vail and the surrounding area. 800.630.8402.
Surely this is advertising, something Wikipedia does not want to promote.  If this must be in here AT ALL, then the phone number should be deleted AND the word "luxury" removed, as it is pure propaganda.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.243.240.4 (talk) 18:18, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Stay" section
Talk:Christian Community Bible

message: I've created a section with a table that shows the differences between the Christian Community Bible, the Catholic, and Jewish orderings of the books in the Old Testament/Hebrew Bible. I am not sure what Wikipedia's footnote style is, so if anyone could correct my reference to the 17th Edition's Introduction I would greatly appreciate it.Fralupo (talk) 02:51, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table of Old Testament Books 

message: Website doesn't seem to work for me, but shows up on Google, so maybe just a temp. problem Wegsjac 16:29, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Website working?

message: THis article is in large part a copyvio from http://www.bible.claret.org/bibles/bmain.htm. -- Avocado 19:16, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If anyone decides to delete this page for copyvio, please first split the Chinese section (with the "Online versions" and "References" sections) into its own article. Thank you.—Gniw (Wing) 14:15, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

text: I have split the article myself—Gniw (Wing) 05:35, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partial copvio 

message: This section cites no references.  For such an important section casting doubt on the credentials of a major bible translation the author should cite sources.
Continued controversy regarding the French translation: Replacement Theology is a central tenant of Catholic Theology. This is a Catholic translation of the bible. Without replacement theology Catholicism would have no sacraments. Therefore why is this comment relevant? -
Of course observant Jews are not going to like being told by Christians that Christianity fulfils the promises of the old testament, and that the new covenant fulfils and super-cedes the Old Covenant.
In the same way the Christians total reject the authenticity of the Aprophrical Gospels which suggest that Jesus was only a man and not divine, while the Muslims accept some of these as proof that Jesus was a Prophet who foretold the coming of Mohammed.
Such comments have a place, but not on this page which is specifically about a particular translation.  
Anruari (talk) 09:55, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversial Editions
Talk:Tuburan, Cebu

message: What determines what "class" a municipality falls in?  Why is this one "3rd class"? JDoorjam 16:35, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the income classification based on the past three years. See here. Hmm...there should be a Wikipedia article with that info... Coffee 17:11, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Gustnado

message: We just had a very good example of a gustnado yesterday (July 31, 2005) in Vail, Arizona. Vail is a small community at the southeast edge of metropolitan Tucson. We all thought it was a tornado, but meteorologists were split: one declared it to be a big dust devil, while another declared it to be a gustnado.
I'm with the second meteorologist. I've never seen a dust devil kick up during a storm in Arizona. They occur on hot, dry days PRIOR to our monsoon, not right in the middle of a monsoon rain in progress. But then again, I've never seen a gustnado before, either.
To see good pictures, follow this link to the site of the meteorologist claiming it to be a dust devil: http://www.kvoa.com/
Paul Allvin
Vail, Arizona
: That was a gustnado if it was produced in the outflow winds gushing away from a storm. Dust devils form in air strongly heated by sunshine.
Hey, just a week ago or so, in Pahrump, NV, I was standing in a gustnado and took a picture real close after it passed by my house. How do I upload this photo?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coffee4binky (talk • contribs) 05:35, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A few handy references for terms are:
* AMS Glossary of Meteorology
* NWS Glossary
* A Comprehensive Glossary of Weather Terms for Storm Spotters (NWS)
Evolauxia 01:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terms 

message: I just edited two of the links in the article since they were both dead.  They were links pointing to a blog on the USA Today website, via a separate website.  All I did was take out the stuff before the USA Today URL and they worked, so I fixed the links in the article.  I'm writing this because the same link appears under both the External Links section and the References section and I didn't know if one should be deleted or not.  I don't know the proper protocol for that kind of thing, so I figured I'd mention it here and let someone else edit the article if necessary. 68.97.2.111 (talk) 04:07, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: EDIT: Did this incorrectly. Thought I knew what I was doing. Sorry. 68.229.40.204 (talk) 06:09, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pahrump, NV, gustnado photo
Talk:Silent synapse

message: Yes, thanks Nrets, that is a more accurate description
OK, Synaptidude, I think all that stuff about alternative explanations is a bit of overkill for this kind of article.  You definitely seem to have more of a stake in this than I do! I think that the review article I suggested simply showed that there had been some sort of controversy, not necesarily to push an agenda.  As far as spillover is concerned, I am not completely convinced that in some cases, what appears to be a silent synapse may actually be NMDAR detecting glutamate spillover.  This is not always the case and it will really depend on the specific anatomy and release probabilities of a given set of synapses.  Rather than put that long controversy in the article, perhaps you can move it to the talk page.  If you want, please add a ref. to a different review article that compliments the one I put in. Nrets 01:57, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Yes, you are right, it was overkill.  I took it out, although I had fun writing it.  I'll paste it below in case we want to use any of it sometime.  I do have a problem with the Voronin review however.  Despite being recent, is completely out of date.  This field might not even be particularly appropriate for a wikipedia article because it is emerging and moving fast.  Most of what Voronin has in the review has now been discredited.  Besides, it's less of a review and more of position piece.  It is he who is pushing an agenda in that paper, and unfortunately, one that has been soundly disproved by later experimental evidence.  So it doesn't really represent where knowledge of the field is.  The authors of that paper are like the Japanese soldiers you sometimes hear about who have spent 60 years on an island, unaware that the war is over.  They are firing their gun but the battlefield has moved on and they have no bullets. Synaptidude 05:52, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Took out overkill

message: Please add some info on/from this study to the article, possibly into a new section. It's currently featured in 2022 in science like so:
A study deploying protein imaging of adult mice suggests adult brains contain, at the tips of filopodia, many (~30% of all dendritic protrusions) "silent synapses" that are inactive until recruited as part of neural plasticity and flexible learning or memories, previously thought to be present mainly in the developing pre-adult brain and to die off with time.
* University press release: 
Notifying main authors of the article:   
Also please fix the section header levels of the above talk page entries and collapse the deleted text (wrap it in a template that can be collapsed).
 Prototyperspective (talk) 11:09, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please update with: "Filopodia are a structural substrate for silent synapses in adult neocortex"
Talk:Greatest Generation

message: Members of the greatest generation are also the parents of the Silent Generation, and can sometimes be the parents of their same generation. --TheLennyGriffinFan1994 (talk) 18:35, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  More offspring 

message: The article entirely ignores the racist political and social structures of the time, nor does it consider the conditions of any other group than white people (and mostly men). Unless you count the reference to jazz. It's understandable, because being seen as the lynchers and segregationists they were damages the Greatest Generation brand. CRT to the rescue.. 67.245.48.136 (talk) 21:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Race 

message: That seems like some very basic info which should definitely be there. 98.175.40.11 (talk) 00:48, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article doesn't mention how many people made up the Greatest Generation.   

message: Why is there a photo of small children from Australia under the subheading "United States / Adolescence"?
It doesn't seem to belong there either by age range or nationality. I would move it but there doesn't seem to be a specific subsection about Australia. I don't feel qualified to make the decision to simply remove the photo but did want to draw this to the attention of editors with more experience. 2600:100A:B109:3F0E:0:47:E919:FB01 (talk) 22:09, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo Placement 

message: Yes, the title is US-centric, even though it does mention Germany.  I mention Germany here because the german WWII generation cannot really be called "the greatest", now can it?  I say that as a German who lost his biological grandfather in WWII on the Eastern Front… surely not the "greatest generation".
And regardless of that, the term is "the greatest generation of Americans" as mentioned in the text.  That makes the title not just US-centric, it makes it US-exclusive. jae (talk) 23:34, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this article is US-centric, as are all the "generation" articles. Baby boomers is probably the least US-centric, but even it is overloaded with a US perspective. HiLo48 (talk) 00:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  US-centric
Talk:Écriture féminine

message: typically 'French'
Brilliant. This article needs massive work. I'll see if I can get my French professor involved... Still, adding the globalise template.163.1.48.136 (talk) 19:13, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added a couple of appropriate quotations and references, did a little editing, and removed the "clean up" template. This is still very much a stub, but it is, I hope, a little tighter. scribblingwoman 20:02, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Article is poorly written and rambling. It needs a thorough clean-up. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:01, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 

message: In what way does it "literally" mean "gendered women's writing"?  It doesn't.  It means literally "female writing", or "feminine writing".  Widsith 13:07, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "translation" 

message: I would like to remove Monique Wittig from the list of theorists in the following sentence: 
This strand of feminist literary theory originated in France in the early 1970s through the works of Cixous and other theorists including Monique Wittig, Luce Irigaray,[2] Chantal Chawaf,[3][4] Catherine Clément, and Julia Kristeva[5][6].
You will notice that she is the only one without any source for her inclusion in that list (besides Cixous whose sources are given in the following section). That is because she was herself against the very idea of "écriture féminine" and argued a great deal against that concept. She explains it herself in the postface of her traduction of La Passion by Djuna Barnes: she argues that there exists no such thing as "écriture féminine", as "the woman is an imaginary formation". She adds: 
"Ecriture féminine is the naturalising metaphor of the political fact of the domination of women. [...] Therefore, to talk about an "écriture féminine" amounts to saying that women don't belong to history and that writing isn't  a material production" Wittig, Monique (1982). Postface, Djuna Barnes, La Passion, Paris, Flammarion, p. 111. ISBN: 2-08-064460-2. 
(My traduction from french). She specifically stood up against écriture féminine.
I'm therefore removing her name from the list and would like it not to be added again without a quote from Wittig herself justifying it. 
2A01:CB19:817D:2400:F914:50FE:51A4:7FD4 (talk) 19:51, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monique Wittig
Talk:You'll Rebel to Anything

message: References to being first studio album to include tracks from Alienating Our Audience and Pink should be removed. The former contains tracks from the 1999 studio album Tight and the latter is a compilation released many years after You'll Rebel to Anything in 2014. I tried to make these edits but they didnt take for some reason. 71.232.159.132 (talk) 15:37, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect info
Talk:1983 World Championships in Athletics

message: Is there any way to fix the width on the tables?  I have added the hypens at the bottom so they have at least a minimum size but this seems to be very crude. If the tables are all the samer size i think it will be easier to scan the results down through all four of the tables. David D. 17:30, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I now realise it is not the table width that is important but defining a size for the cells.  Is this something that we need to do? Now I look again at the other years it does not look so bad with the tables being distinct sizes.  One distinct advantage of not having a fixed cell size is that the tables reduce their size a bit as the browser window is made smaller.  David D. 17:40, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Fix width
Talk:Chen Gong

message: i am here to explain my last edit at 17:31, 1 August 2005, which removed a significant amount of content added previously by user DengMao. i hope the deletion would not offend anyone, especially him (or her). The deletion was because i believe that the full record of Chen Gong's life, as it was presented in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, is unnecessary. It would suffice to note the significant difference between the historical record and the novelistic version, in this case the fictitious meeting and parting with Cao Cao and the dramatized Battle of Puyang. --Plastictv 17:39, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Phew. :) --Plastictv 13:03, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing significant amount of content under ROTK section
Talk:Le Sud-Ouest

message: The borough does not use the french deffinate article in its own publications (see ). I've heard the borough in question refered to as "The South-West Borough", "The Sud-Ouest Borough" and "Sud-Ouest" but never "Le Sud-Ouest" in English. - Farquard 18:08, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it does use the article in its own publications, though this is recent, so not everything on the website is up to date. (You cited a 2004 publication; compare the June 2005 edition of the borough paper.) For another example, a recent internal publication that I came across at the borough office was quite categorical about the fact that the "Le" is part of the name. See also the Commission de Toponymie entry here. - Montréalais 22:48, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case, request withdrawn. - Farquard 23:13, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Why is there a "Le" in the title of this article? It's like naming this article "The" South-West 70.55.203.112 (talk) 10:02, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See above, please. -- Montréalais (talk) 01:22, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Le" Sud-Ouest?
Talk:Whispering gallery

message: Didn't a President use a Whispering gallery in either the white house or the capital to easedrop? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.241.245.49 (talk) 18:10, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Eavesdropping

message: The mention of Caltech/JPL should route to Whispering Gallery mode, and the external link therof should be purged and moved to the WGM, too. MKV 20:52, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: External Link

message: The mention of Whispering Gallery Modes from the University of Bristol was moved to the Whispering Gallery Waves pageFemtoquake (talk) 02:57, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision of article

message: I believe the explanation of the effect is partially incorrect, or at least misleading. It looks like the assertion is that a curved wall behaves as a conventional reflector with a focal point (as in geometrical optics), but looking at the introduction of the article for the Whispering-gallery wave effect, one can see that the above explanation is simplistic in that the effect depends on resonance which would allow the acoustic wave to take the less direct path (mode) across the curved surface of a wall, and not directly through the air. 
This is a significant distinction. While direct acoustic reflection obviously occurs in some cases (parabolic reflectors in a science museum is the classic artificial example), this other propagation mode which depends on the wave nature of sound is not even mentioned in this article. I'm not confident enough in my assertion to edit the article myself but I would be curious to see some input about this. 
130.199.3.165 (talk) 20:45, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scientific Explanation Problematic 

message: For the United States the sequence of entries appears to be random. Some thoughts
1. Order by name of feature. 
2. Order by state and within state by city and within city by name of feature? Note: One entry is for two states? 
3. Sequence does not matter. Greenwayfriend (talk) 01:33, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sequence of examples
Talk:Anniemal

message: Nice article! Rusty8 (talk) 20:33, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Intro" is sampled from "Gimme Your Money" (DJ Kicks: Annie)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.128.244.232 (talk) 03:22, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro Sample 
Talk:Sky High (2005 film)

message: The Sequel section probably should be deleated for the following reasons:
1. There's no references for it.
2. It's opinion based
Andrewnuva199 (talk) 03:13, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sequel? 

message: Changed "vegan" to "vegetarian" for Layla, since she offers cheese to Warren at the dance. --Noclevername (talk) 22:58, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Veg out

message: The redirect Sky High 2 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.   Jay 💬 09:17, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Sky High 2]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]