lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Live food

message: Are there any instances of live food for humans? I can only think of examples in science-fiction for non-humans, i.e. gagh for Klingons.--DrWho42 (talk) 19:10, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The first ones that come to mind are 'Drunken Shrimp', Casu Marzu(that maggotty cheese), and raw oysters.  And to paralell Gagh, there's the raw, still-squirming octopus tentacles of Sannakji.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Dishes_involving_the_consumption_of_live_animals
74.78.24.255 (talk) 07:16, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Live food for humans
Talk:Adrian Dingli

message: Please can someone who knows the subject disambiguate the redlink Civil Laws on this page to one of the alternative articles shown under Civil law? Thank you. Certes (talk) 20:52, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civil Laws 
Talk:Trough (geology)

message: This article is a mess. More text or less pictures. Right now it looks like a damned collage.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timothyjosephwood (talk • contribs) 07:49, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - did some image culling. The article itself needs a lot of work, it's one of those terms that's much less used these days, at least by geologists. Mikenorton (talk) 09:43, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Holy pictures Batman!
Talk:2007 Preakness Stakes

message: Does anyone else think that the wikitable of prep races does not belong? I think the table here is redundant, as the same thing exists at 2007 Kentucky Derby (with the exception that the latter race is included in the table here.) Most likely, when 2007 Belmont Stakes is created, the same table will be included again. Either the table here should be removed with a link to the 2007 Kentucky Derby article replacing it, or a new page (for example, Major preparatory races for the 2007 Triple Crown) should be created and both tables replaced with links to it.--Grand Slam 7 | Talk 23:26, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Health Care Service Corporation

message: changed the flag "relies larhgely upon a single reference" to "refimprove", because this stub is unreferenced. 
i inserted the only ref for the 2 sentences which i added. the rest doesnt depend on "a single source" so that flag is incorrect.--Wuerzele (talk) 08:48, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  changed flag 

message: I'm not sure how to format it, but the citation needed in this section can use the overview page on the HCSC site - http://www.hcsc.com/overview.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kcorless (talk • contribs) 00:57, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company Structure citation needed 

message: I have recently added a new section: Educational Opportunities which mentions their Blue university, I thought it should be added there since it is quite unique about this company. I'm trying to add more information about the company as a whole.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LegendaryBlob (talk • contribs) 00:22, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Educational opportunities
Talk:Tony Gauci

message: Tony Gauci (6 April 1944 – 29 October 2016) ... Gauci died on 29 October 2016, in Swieqi, Malta at the age of 75.
Can somebody please fix that? By my calculation: 2016-1944=72, 72≠75 Kelisi (talk) 14:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Accoring to reference 5 he died in 2016 at the age of 75, however I actually can't find anything saying he was born in 1944, I suggest we either change it to (1940/1941 - 29 October 2016) or just (d. 29 October 2016) D348vR (talk) 14:42, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What?!
Talk:Mary Fenech Adami

message: What is the problem with this article? Mrs. Fenech Adami is notable in Malta and worldwide.
 Maltesedog (talk) 20:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Draft talk:Feeding America

message: This organisation claims that 15% of US population "is facing hunger" (whatever that means). However, that definitely contradicts the ikipedia use of term "Hunger". I think this should be covered in the article. --Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii (talk) 13:55, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Term "[[Hunger]]".
Talk:Trampas Whiteman

message: I am removing the notability tag from this article as the original creator already explained why Trampas Whiteman is worth including on Wikipedia and the article cites that he is author of several published books. He is a well known figure in the D&D community and has won an Ennie Award for his fansite. This tag has been removed before and no reason was given for putting it back, so I'm going to remove it again. Big Mac (talk) 04:17, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm removing the notabilty tag from this article
Talk:Outcrop

message: Hi, i have noticed that the links for 2 and 3 are missing and go to a non existing links. Laxanan (talk) 03:56, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I reverted the edit by Awickert of this article, with apologies, because I don't see Outcrops are regions but as a geological feature.ping (talk) 07:46, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK - that's it. I was thinking along the lines of a region of the ground. I'll re-word, and I'm sorry I missed this when I undid you. Hopefully you'll like it better, if not, feel free to change and/or revert me. Awickert (talk) 08:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Region

message: recently i was in Western Australia. Outcrop there has a function of captioning rain water that falls maybe once every five months. 
http://picasaweb.google.com/woepwoep/AUS#5449975401487551058  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Woepwoep (talk • contribs) 16:45, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Outcrop in WA

message: thumb|Aufschluss von Ton- und Sandsteinen des Keupers am Schwanberg bei Iphofen
These three pictures from the German WP might be used in the article; the third one is of an outcrop on the planet Mars (at the the moment the article just covers outcrops on Earth).--Johnsoniensis (talk) 08:51, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Extraterrestrial occurrences &c
Talk:Snakeskin gourami

message: Dragonbite 03:23, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Bochr (talk) 03:30, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo request
Talk:Silver Knights (video game)

message: Did some major, major cleanup. Now looks more like an encyclopedia article that has some value.Jhonkaman (talk) 11:28, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Nature Trail to Hell

message: I have reverted the redirect to reinstate the article content, as I believe that a short article is warranted on this song. I have also removed the notability tag that was present prior to the deletion and undeletion, per the discussion on DRV. Comments welcome. Newyorkbrad 23:39, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In the absence of any reason for thinking this non-single song to be notable enough for a stub that shopws no sign of being expanded to anything more, I've returned it to a redirect.  If some genuine reason is given for having an article it can of course be discussed. --Mel Etitis  (Talk) 20:56, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Okay, this may seem weird, but I have heard that Nature Trail to Hell (and Christmas at Ground-0) were at some stage made into an extremley crappy movie. I only have Stomp Tokyo as a resource for this, so it'd highly likley that it's a load of crap, but seriously, is there any information this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.90.204.139 (talk) 22:25, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Movie
Talk:Anteclise

message: I propose a redirect to Massif, a largely synonymous term that is used much more widely. One of the examples listed in this anteclise article (the Voronezh Anteclise) already redirects to the Voronezh Massif article. GeoWriter (talk) 10:56, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to "Massif"
Talk:Syneclise

message: Although not a precise synonym, the usage of "syneclise"  overlaps greatly with the term sedimentary basin. Some of the structures given as examples, such as the Dnieper-Donits Basin are only rarely described as a "syneclise". I propose a redirect to sedimentary basin as suggested by  at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geology#Syneclise. Mikenorton (talk) 17:07, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to "Sedimentary basin"
Talk:River rejuvenation

message: Conclusion on the topic river rejuvenation 197.184.167.28 (talk) 15:31, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography 

message: Background of river rejuvenation 41.13.10.177 (talk) 19:34, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography river rejuvenation 

message: How it forms 105.0.7.49 (talk) 07:23, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social
Talk:Shabnam Masood

message: Aged 22 on 16 May 2008. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 21:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note 

message: British Soap Awards interview with Thakrar and Ghadami
:Interviewer: How does Shabnam feel when her big secret comes out?
:Thakrar: Well, it is something she's been dreading for many years so like with any secret that you've been holding for that long, it is like ripping a plaster off or a burn or something, you know, it is absolutely devastating for her and that is one of the reasons why it is frosty between Kush and Shabnam. It is because she has to keep him at a distance because she is scared that she is going to loose him, which inevitably she pushes him away into Stacey's arms and it is kind of her own fault.
:Interviewer: Do you hope in the long term Shabnam might want to be a mum to this child?
:Thakrar: We don't know - I would hope so. I don't know what they [show bosses] are planning but I would love to see that. I'd love to see her trying to make amends, well I don't know if you can ever make amends for something like that, but you know, try to build a relationship with this little girl and then when the secret does come out to Masood, which is soon, that is quite explosive. People keep making jokes about him being a bad ass Masmood.
Soaper1234 (talk) 16:36, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants v Osborne

message: It's not clear that the scope of Osborne is very great at all.  Any new union would have been be capable of having a political fund in their rules form day one.  Moreover existing unions which did not have such a rule could probably adopt one by vote, and if not create a successor body which did.  All the best: Rich Farmbrough 11:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope
Talk:S wave

message: I think it might be a bit misleading to have the P-wave shadow diagram on the S-wave page - the caption makes sense but a casual observer will probably just glance and think the waves in the diagram are S-waves.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.171.98.21 (talk) 14:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the s-wave is a awesome thing that was discovered!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.49.30.66 (talk) 23:06, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  s-wave 

message: But they are so lame!§
i love leaning about the s-wave p-wave and surface wave i like that it is on wikipedia! this site has every thing:)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.49.30.66 (talk) 23:09, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  waves 

message: How long do s waves typically last for in an earthquake?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.92.83 (talk) 09:53, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duration 

message: Shear waves are not limited to seismic applications. As the article also handles the general shear-waves, this should be handled fist, though its names S-wave and not shear wave. The name S-waves and even more secondary wave seems to be more specific for seismic shear waves. The introduction is rather long anyway, at least for an article with automatic table of contend. So I suggest moving much of the more specific seismic part down to a section like "seismic waves". Ulrich67 (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: There are also medical applications. See Talk:Shear waves. Biscuittin (talk) 20:51, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  General and seismic meaning 

message: The hard section claimed "These waves do not diverge". Is that correct?I suppose that was a reading of the divergent being zero.  But that does not mean that the wave does not diverge (spread out).  Does it? --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 18:44, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Do not diverge"?
Talk:Fault scarp

message: I removed the paragraph on the Maruia Falls, as they were caused by a landslide triggered by the 1929 Murchison earthquake . The earthquake did cause a 4.5 m high fault scarp, but we don't have a picture of that. Mikenorton (talk) 15:40, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Maruia Falls
Talk:Vertical seismic profile

message: Everything within this article is relevant to the topic, however the article assumes the reader already has a great knowledge of seismic profiles. The article itself never truly discusses what a vertical seismic profile does or what the purpose of drafting one can be. It just discusses how one operates, which can confuse someone who does not understand the purpose of a VSP already. The information within this article is not outdated as it utilizes a source from 2014. This article has room for improvement and could use more information on what a vertical seismic profile does for scientists. Scientific information within the article is presented in a confusing manner; each time a point is made a letter (A) is listed afterwards as if to emphasize the point. This gives the opposite effect and makes it confusing and hard to understand. The article utilizes jargon and is accurate, but it lacks clarity. The article does link to multiple other wikipedia articles for related topics, which makes this article multiply into 8 other articles if one is to truly understand it. 
Mkistner6 (talk) 18:56, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Amplitude versus offset

message: This article needs an explanation of the Intercept and Gradient concepts. It could also use a definition of the 4 basic classes of anomalous AVO responses. Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 14:34, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reworked the introduction, added some background theory and I'm working on this now. Nwhit (talk) 15:11, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intercept and Gradient 

message: User:Nwhit has made an excellent diagram for the intro section of this article but it has 2 small errors. Other than that, it's all looking great!
*The "offset" definition should probably be something like R_n-X_n. But I think it would be even more useful to just draw a double sided arrow showing the offset distance directly on the digram (above the common midpoint) and not on the legend. Something like this:
<------Offset_3------>
<----Offset_2---->
<--Offset_1-->
*The angle shown on the diagram is not the angle of incidence, it is it's complementary angle. The angle of incidence if measured between the ray path the vertical.
-Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 00:52, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small errors in the Intro Diagram about the geometry
Talk:Aleutian Trench

message: The way the Aleutian Trench article is written, it includes more information on the Alaska-Aleutian megathrust than that article contains. I think these articles should be merged because 1)  Both features are caused by the subduction at this plate boundary, and will contain a lot of redundant information if properly fleshed out. 2) This article currently contains more information about the megathrust and its seismicity than the article on the megathrust. 3) People looking for information on this plate boundary should not need to find both articles in order to get all the information. 4) There simply isn't enough information in total to justify multiple pages.
Elriana (talk) 16:22, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge 
Talk:Breakwater (band)

message: thats what people who like funk are called  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deanostrodamus (talk • contribs) 18:07, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately your undo removed all of the cleanup unrelated to the word "funkateer". Please be more careful of the undo option in the future. Just64helpin (talk) 19:10, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  funketeer
Talk:Memeology

message: Hi,
I was looking for the science of history known as cliological studies in a book by micheal flynn known as country of the blind. Where different societies are trying to create a future based on manipulating the present using predictive technologies. When I went browsing for the science of history there weren't many links to anything except for a few web pages. I found from a website that the real science of history is known as memeology. Then doing a search on memeology the earth society has an explanation. Their interpretation is found in:
http://members.earthsociety.org/index.php?title=Memeology
As this is my first new page, I will make any changes or accept that it can be removed if it is not regarded as relevant as I most definitely want wikipedia to be the best information source that it can be. This reference is a stub and needs to be expanded with more information. Unfortunately that might constitute original research and thus be not allowed. I will think about this and try and come up with more information on this subject.
Drugged monkey 00:20, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Gelifluction

message: #http://www.physicalgeography.net/physgeoglos/g.html#gelifluction
#http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0033589476900405
#http://www.arlis.org/docs/vol1/ICOP/55700698/Pdf/Chapter_064.pdf
ForbiddenRocky (talk) 23:13, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible references
Talk:Nimbarka Sampradaya

message: The other Sampradaya articles Sri Sampradaya, Brahma Sampradaya and Rudra Sampradaya describe some philosophy, foremost dvaita vs. advaita, Achintya-Bheda-Abheda a.s.o.. This one? ... said: Rursus (bork²) 12:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Philisophies?

message: I've merged :Nimbarka into this article; the articles overlap, while much info is still missing. I'll also merge :Dvaitadvaita into this article. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:30, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged 

message: I've created separate pages for its founder Nimbarka, and the philosophy Dvaitadvaita so that it is consistent in its structure with the articles for other Vaisnava sampradayas. (User talk:Madhav kiran sodum) 12:26, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no need to have three pages on the same topic. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 14:01, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separated 

message: * Andrew J. Nicholson, Bhedabheda Vedanta, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
* Aleksandar Uskokov, Nimbārka: "There is no scholarly consensus about the date of Nimbārka."
* Vijay Ramnarace (2014), Rādhā-Kṛṣṇa’s Vedāntic Debut: Chronology & Rationalisation in the Nimbārka Sampradāya, PhD-thesis
Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:09, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: this move, from Nimbarka Sampradaya to Kumara Sampradaya, was undiscussed; would one of you be able to move it back? Thanks! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 12:08, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks! Ehm... also the talkpage? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 12:50, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undiscussed move
Talk:Oxford Clay

message: Here is a list of non-dinosaurian reptiles from the Oxford Clay:
Plesiosaurs:
1. Liopleurodon ferox Sauvage, 1873
2. Marmornectes candrewi Ketchum and Benson, 2011
3. Simolestes vorax Andrews, 1913
4. "Pliosaurus" andrewsi Tarlo, 1960
5. Peloneustes philarchus (Seeley, 1869)
6. Pachycostasaurus dawnii Cruickshank, Martill, David, and Noe, 1996
7. Cryptocleidus eurymerus (Philips, 1871)
8. Cryptocleidus richardsoni (Lydekker, 1889)
9. Tricleidus seelyi Andrews, 1909
10. Muraenosaurus leedsi Seeley, 1874 (=Tremamesacleis platyclis [Seeley, 1892])
11. Muraenosaurus beloclis (Seeley, 1892) (type species of Picrocleidus Andrews, 1909)
Ichthyosaurs:
1. Ophthalmosaurus icenicus Seeley, 1874
Pterosaurs:
1. "Rhamphorhynchus" jessoni Lydekker, 1890
Marine crocodiles:
1. Suchodus brachyrhynchus (Eudes-Deslongchamps, 1867)
2. Suchodus durobrivensis Lydekker, 1890
3. Gracilineustes leedsi (Andrews, 1913)
4. Metriorhynchus superciliosus (Blainville, 1853)
5. Steneosaurus edwardsi Eudes-Deslongchamps, 1867
6. Steneosaurus leedsi Andrews, 1909
7. Steneosaurus durobrivensis Andrews, 1909
8. Steneosaurus obtusidens Andrews, 1909
9. New genus and species (Young et. al., in press)
Young MT, Andrade MB, Brusatte SL, Sakamoto M, Liston J (2012) The oldest known metriorhynchid super-predator: a new genus and species from the Middle Jurassic of England, with implications for serration and mandibular evolution in predacious clades. J Syst Palaeontol. In press. 68.4.28.33 (talk) 20:29, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Palebiota expansion
Talk:Endoclip

message: How and when are the endo-clips removed, or are they to be left in-place indefinitely?  The "safety" section of this article says that endo-clips may be dislodged after 1-3 weeks or may be retained up to 26 months, but doesn't say whether either outcome is a good or bad thing.
108.45.179.167 (talk) 18:34, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct usage of endoclips?
Talk:Kraków szopka

message: ...is currently at this address -Yupik (talk) 23:40, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Culture.pl's link
Talk:Marquis Downs

message: SriMesh | talk 00:40, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of terrorist incidents in Pakistan since 2001/Archive 1

message: I added a lot of info, but also deleted some figures which I deemed unimportant. This article is much better now, and features important terrorist activities in Pakistan. I have also tried to reference every event with some reputable media source. The entries that don't have references are usually cited by the neighboring entry. And lastly, it would be better if this article is merged with Terrorism in Pakistan. Razzsic 00:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Improved Article
Talk:Itacolumite

message: Currently (at the time of writing this), this entire Wikipedia article consists of only 4 paragraphs. That seems awfully short to me, especially for a science-related article. That said, I know virtually nothing about geology or anything surrounding geology, so I don't know how much more could or should be added to this article. TheWizardG (talk) 04:57, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this article be marked as a stub?
Talk:Sydney Basin

message: The article should be extended to provide more information on geology features. Solarapex 00:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20120320115902/http://www.friendsberowravalley.org.au/html/landscape_-_geology.html and http://australianmuseum.net.au/The-Sydney-Basin/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:31, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed