lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Ballads

message: I understand that the "pop music" marketing comprises of a handful of ballads.  I also understand that ballads are overplayed on radio stations in general.  And another thing that needs to be better understood, is that some song titles in this cagegory need to be shifted to :Category:Pop ballads.  Because congestion from listing song titles occurs from having such crude criteria for media.  Personally, I don't even like listening to ballads. --Roadstaa (talk) 04:23, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pop ballads, and ones overplayed on radio
Talk:Appalachiosaurus

message: "Only a juvenile skeleton has been found, representing an animal over 7 meters (23 ft) long and weighing over 600 kilograms (1300 lb), which indicates an adult would have been even larger."Anybody have a well-informed guess on the adult size of this thing? -- 201.37.230.43 (talk) 13:17, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The known specimen is subadult, probably not too far off from being fully adult, so my own guess is it wouldn't be that much larger. Dinoguy2 (talk) 15:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd have to agree as well. 30 feet, max. (And a pretty comprehensive article, considerind how new Appalachiosaurus is and its obscurity! Crimsonraptor (talk) 18:48, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Estimated adult size?

message: “Only a juvenile skeleton has been found, representing an animal over 7 meters (23 ft) long and weighing over 600 kilograms (1300 lb), which indicates an adult would have been even larger“
No source seems to be cited to back up this statement - does anyone know what the intended source is? Wikitherium (talk) 15:40, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed for juvenile weight estimates
Talk:Fiat Coupé

message: Kayjey, good work.
No offence mate, but I tidied some stuff up and tried to conform it to Wiki's NPOV policy (for example, "In addition, and much to the dismay of existing LE customers, the 2.0 L 5 cylinder Turbo "Plus" arrived on the scene")...
Also:
Has anyone got a source for the Schumacher '0001' rumour?
Has anyone a better pic of a 16V, possibly, though not exclusively, side on like the 20V pictured? Image Use Policy
Kayjey, you've got a load of photos on your site. Are you willing to use some?
> Can anyone put up a nice interior pic? my car is a bit too tatty --88.110.208.138 21:57, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

message: http://www.polak.ch/coupemanual/Tech%20data%2020vlv.htm 
Source for top speed of 220PS 2.0 Turbo engined coupéYBSOne (talk) 16:52, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  220PS top speed 
Talk:Archaeoceratops

message: Is a dinosaur family with 3 memebers: Archaeoceratops, Liaoceratops and Kulceratops.Not only with Archaeoceratops.And this family have information.I do not understand why redirect. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 10:44, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Make it yourself! Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 21:50, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Why Archaeoceratopsidae redirect to Archaeoceratops?
Talk:Lunar: Silver Star Story

message: Having a seperate article for certain versions of the same game is unecessarily confusing. Furthermore, it's unclear which versions should fall under this article. 4 out of the 6 discreet releases (thus excluding budget re-releases) use the name Lunar: Silver Star Story without the Complete, and logically they should be under this article. However, most of them are treated under Lunar: Silver Star Story Complete. Thus, I am merging this with Lunar: Silver Star Story Complete.
Shiva Indis 02:14, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Lunar: Silver Star Story Complete]]
Talk:Archaeornithoides

message: In the article, it is written that "The body length was estimated at fifty to sixty centimetres,[3] making the Archaiornithoides type one of the smallest known non-avian dinosaurs.", with the paper from Elzanowski & Wellnhofer (1992) as a reference for the body size. Yet, besides an estimate of the skull length (50 cm), I cannot find any information on body length in this article. Could it be a mistake? Thanks in advance!--Christophe Hendrickx (talk) 02:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Body length
Talk:George Fergusson (diplomat)

message: * Needs references and sources badly.
* Too little information on this person, more needs to be added.
* Needs to be copy-edited and rewritten, unfortunately there isn't much to rewrite in the first place.
Atellus 02:20, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems
Talk:Arkansaurus

message: Oh boy, have we got some work to do here. For starters, the skepticism section contains weasel-speak and lacks even a single source. I have already placed in a few citations needed, would like some help. The bit on the Arkansaurus itself is better in the citation department, but it seems disproportionately short to the rest of the article.
Saji Loupgarou (talk) 20:11, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the skepticism section appears to derive from the second external link. The editor who created the section in this article must not have seen or did not think much of the feedback page, which backs off quite a bit. If the thing ever does get formally described, I'd suspect that the questions will be mentioned, since he asked the people who are or have been working on it, but I don't know how well the page meets reliable sources. J. Spencer (talk) 22:19, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is a mess! 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Beatles

message: We folks over at Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles have a couple of AFD's active, so I've decided to be bold and create this page for transclusion. If your project doesn't want it, please move it to Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles/Deletion sorting and let us know, there will be no hard feelings :-) --kingboyk 02:29, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Atlantosaurus

message: This page requires a Taxobox. Atlantosaurus montanus (Marsh, 1877) [originally "Titanosaurus"] is the type (and only) species. This animal is a diplodocid sauropod dinosaur, and was originally named "Titanosaurus" before its discoverer changed it to Atlantosaurus to note that Titanosaurus was already used for a titanosaur (Titanosaurus Lydekker, 1877). Since Atlantosaurus is a monotypic yet dubious genus, given the information above, it is not chimeric and should be removed from the category "Invalid dinosaurs". 72.194.116.63 00:25, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right--this is a nomen dubium, not a JSS of either of the genera listed in the article. I'll fix it up a bit. Dinoguy2 02:15, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomy of Atlantosaurus 

message: I have a personal record of another species, A. immanus. Can anyone else verify this?Ninjatacoshell 18:06, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A. immanus is considered a synonym of Apatosaurus ajax. ArthurWeasley 20:11, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another species?
Talk:Atlasaurus

message: Leo1pard (talk) 03:50, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page views 

message: It came in the news. A tail believed to belong to Atlasaurus imelakai is in Mexico, which is strange, because Mexico is not in Africa. Leo1pard (talk) 03:50, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  News
Talk:Atrociraptor

message: "Atrociraptor is most closely related to Deinonychus." Based on whose opinion? Atrociraptor is classified in the Dromaeosaurinae; Deinonychus belongs to the Velociraptorinae. Perhaps somebody got their names mixed up, and this was meant to state that it is most closely related to Dromaeosaurus? 75.210.173.183 (talk) 08:40, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Has Atrociraptor actually been referred to dromaeosaurinae, or was that done as original research based on its relationship to Deinonychus (which has tended to jump between subfamilies is studies recently)? Dinoguy2 (talk) 00:38, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't find hardly anything online that talks about Atrociraptor, at least not its taxonomic status. DinoData claims it is velociraptorine but I'm a little leery of using DD as a definitive source with nothing to back it up... although, if it is in fact most closely related to Deinonychus then the taxobox needs to be revised--obviously it cannot be most closely related to something in an entirely different family. 75.211.103.38 (talk) 05:33, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The thing is, Deinoncyhus has variously been referred to both dromaeosaurinae and velociraptorinae. So even if somebody assigned Atociraptor to dromaeosaurinae, they'd probably place Deinonychus there as well. Subfamily classification is extremely variable, especially in dromaeosaurs, which seem to shuffle subfamilies with every new study. I think it's not a great idea to list subfamilies in the taxoboxes at all, but somebody went around adding them a few months ago. I've removed it from here, barring a published referral. Also, you keep referring to "family"--make sure you're not confused on this point--both Atrociraptor and Deinoncychus are most certainly dromaeosaurids, just not necessarily dromaeosaurines. Dinoguy2 (talk) 07:59, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Subfamily. I know. 75.211.103.38 (talk) 09:20, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: You know that update it 71.172.160.155 (talk) 21:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I added it. 35.129.185.139 (talk) 20:08, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  anyone thing there should be a pop culture selection added do to dominion
Talk:Auroraceratops

message: I'm highly skeptical that a 20-cm long neoceratopsian skull was attached to a 5.8 m body. From what I remember of the clade member's general proportions that just can't be. If a good reference for either that length or a reasonable one can't be found I propose the offending statement should be removed. Dracontes 12:52, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Length
Talk:Avaceratops

message: http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a301/ZukoPunk/76.jpg
This is an exact photo of what Avaceratops looked likeUser: Punk18
:Cool! You can stick it here, Wikipedia:WikiProject Dinosaurs/Image review, to see what others think too. Cas Liber 01:41, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I found an image 
Talk:Avalonianus

message: It's not clear from the article as to if Avalonianus was the original, pre-occupied name or the substitute. I can infer that it is the substitute, but I shouldn't have to play Sherlock Holmes in an encyclopedia article. Can someone with better information fix this? I don't have the off-line resources, and my internet connection has been too buggy lately for the time it would take to do the research. CFLeon (talk) 19:18, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Dinosauria.com indicates that Avalonianus is the substitute for the original Avalonia. I've corrected the article to be clearer on this. CFLeon (talk) 23:55, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Chicken or the Egg?
Talk:Avisaurus

message: The very first sentence states that Avisaurus is,"a genus in a group of Cretaceous terrestrial flightless birds called Enantiornithes..."
This sentence is very confusing to me in several ways. First of all, I as a reader question whether Avisaurus itself is flightless, or is the broad Enantiornithe family overall considered flightless? But more importantly, the concept of both Avisaurus and Enantiornithes in general being flightless seems to contradict other facts in this and related articles. I've read from several sources, including this discussion page, that Avisaurus is viewed as being a bird-of-prey type organism, which seems rather farfetched if Avisaurus is indeed flightless. Plus, classifying the entire branch of Enantiornithe birds as flightless is equally silly, for that means that species such as Enantiornis and Eoalulavis(which was one of the oldest birds to have an alula, a special feather on the thumb that helps a bird steer in flight) are also flightless.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.3.129.181 (talk) 02:36, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flightless Avisaurus? Or Flightless Enantiornithes? 

message: Since "A. gloriae", now Gettyia was split off from Avisaurus, how many Avisaurus specimens remain? Is the genus represented only by a single bone, an isolated tarsometatarsus? If so this could be worth mentioning in the lead. Rauisuchian (talk) 11:54, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sole tarsometatarsus?
Talk:Preston (singer)

message: have added some info on them. didnt know much, so its kind of a reworded version of the original ordinary boys article. LiAm McShAnE 16:18, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Ordinary Boys

message: I've been out of the UK for two years and have no idea who this person is. I would like to say, though, that I agree with the majority of the writings above. Sachabrunel 20:41, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Yes

message: Shouldn't Samuel Preston goto the american civil war guy first? surely he's more notable. He was notable enough to have six navy ships named after him. whereas this Preston is mainly famous for being a bit of a burk on a gameshow once. Elmo 02:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Firstly, please sign your comments. And actually I would agree. I am not a Preston fan, I just want the article to be neutral, and not totally anti-Preston like many other wants. --UpDown 12:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: I'm sorry, but the fact that there's already an article on The Ordinary Boys, 'Too much small talk leads to a small mind' Samuel Preston. --77.249.207.50 (talk) 17:49, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Not noteworthy
Talk:FAP

message: Check any image board or forum that discusses these things these days. "fap" will be most prevalent. It is widely used in commercial and non commercial doujin, as well as translations of such and a variety of webcomics, pay or non. It is also starting to leak out into the real world for use in certain circles. Being used prominently at various conventions. Google result #1 for 'fap' links to the urban dictionary entry for "fap" the onomatopoeic. Otherwise, just refer to imageboards, forums and chats "fap" will be exteremly prevalent in use for such means to describe male masturbation, even nominalized or verbized: 'fapper', 'fapping' etc.
(66.41.156.63 (talk) 23:27, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Onomatopoeic 

message: Since this more of a list than an article, there's really no encyclopedic way to mention this outside of a talk page, but I wanted to mention it here since I find it interesting and amusing.  On Neopets, there are several word games, and since a lot of the site is directed towards and intended for children, certain potentionally "objectionable" words, such as "pot" and "weed", are omitted from their word database, despite having completly innocuous definitions aside from their slang usage... however, "fap" is allowed, and comes up quite often during the 3-letter round of the game Typing Terror.  ("Boner" is also allowed, but that's another story.) - Ugliness Man 07:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neopets 

message: This is the second or third time I have removed redundant mentions of the masturbation reference.  It seems like every now and then someone comes to the article, completely ignores the first sentence, and only looks at the list.  Then, noticing that the list doesn't mention this meaning, adds it.  Part of the problem, it seems, is that the reference in the opening sentence was a brief, almost dismissive, mention, whereas some people seem to think it should be the focus.  I doubt that my recent edit will solve this problem completely, but I've expanded the opening so that this definition is a little more visible, and mentioned first.  I also hope that the way I've edited it makes it clear that the list is a list of acronyms, so that adding another redudant mention of the masturbation refrence to the list would clearly be incorrect. - Ugliness Man 16:56, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Department of redundancy 

message: Why does it say a "childish" reference to male masturbation isnt that bias?(The Wise Vafhudr 04:28, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is biased. See WP:NPOV. However, it is also no longer in the page as of now. JohnSmith13345 (talk) 11:35, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Childish
Talk:Goblin Commander: Unleash the Horde

message: Downsizing to something more appropriate, getting rid of icky Gameguide information.ZappyGun (talk to me)What I've done for Wikipedia 02:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Cleanup 
Talk:B. Brian Blair

message: This article is one of [ thousands] on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it. Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed. I'm putting this message on the talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy. In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material violating someone's copyright. If you are not sure whether the link on this article should be removed or if you would like to help spread this message, contact us on User talk:J.smith/YouTube Linklist. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 00:54, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: YouTube links 

message: Okay, I hit the new content with a "citation needed" tag a day or two ago, and no one has cited a source for Iron Sheik's comments. I'm going to remove it. If someone can find a reliable citation for the shoot interview that is mentioned, feel free to add it back. IMWeazel 23:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iron Sheik Conflict additions

message: Can someone please fix this page, as there is a lot of vadalism at the start of this page. Thanks Michaelclarkc 20:27, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Di mo

message: Can someone please add the Chinese characters and pinyin for dimo?  Badagnani 02:56, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese characters

message: Proposal:  move article to "Dimo."  Dimo (following pinyin conventions) should be romanized as one word.  Badagnani 20:13, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:John Calhoun (disambiguation)

message: Two notes:
# There's an article to be written about the third entry: John Calhoun, 1806-1859, Illinois polititian, Surveyor General and pro-slavery leader in the "Bleeding Kansas" era 
# Based on What links here, it seems as though there should be at least a couple of additional entries here. 
I've no time to address these now. older ≠ wiser 03:19, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:Shadows Are Security

message: Maybe we shouldn't be taking the font so literally. Most albums have the font in all caps, but we don't name the articles in all caps. Tim Long 21:54, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, Frail Words Collapse is in all lowercase as well, but that article isn't listed in lowercase. War wizard90 17:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Redlands, Cremorne

message: This article is not well researched. The school was saved from closure by a group of parents who formed the school council.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apple9595 (talk • contribs) 22:45, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

message: Why have the scandals been eliminated from this page. History should not be forgotten. All mentions of previous bullying problems which eventually culminated in a stabbing have been removed, people who want to find out about the school would have a strong interest in knowing some of this information.
There should also be an addition about recent changes in the school, concerning building works, scandals with many of the teachers leaving and being fired, etc.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.168.163.186 (talk) 12:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Scandals

message: May I suggest that you not adjust the Wikipedia article to include obvious commercial advertising, especially if you are not prepared to register with Wikipedia and sign off on your changes to this article. Masalai 13:43, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 165.228.86.214

message: I have them of other teachers socialising with me and wife evenings and weekends but those are obviously not of wide interest. Masalai (talk) 18:23, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are there now photos of the school as it now -- and a while back -- stands and stood?
Talk:Cyber Troopers Virtual-On Force

message: Because Famitsu says so. --Stormwatch (talk) 03:43, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xbox 360 version coming
Talk:Arriving

message: The VASI lights show that you'll all be dead!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.27.83.139 (talk) 04:05, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  VASI Lights 
Talk:Melasma

message: This article was categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM:CAT. kilbad (talk) 01:15, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article categorization 

message: melasma is more abranger disease, many people in the world have this problem. the metabolism is not afect  only for the tiroidys and  sex hormonis but of the sun efects and pregnancy catabolism too.the melanocyte cell do one product melanin pigment have tropism for facial skin but deleterim action  of interferon c cause this condidion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.179.186.130 (talk • contribs) 03:30, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: One of the points under treatment smacks of advertising. I will go ahead and remove it. Please discuss here on the talk page before reverting.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TorArne (talk • contribs) 17:53, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising 

message: I think the addition of some epidemiological info would be a great addition to this article.
AriaNo11 (talk) 20:15, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  epidemiology