Talk:Third Day

message: I'd like to propose inserting at the top of this article
:For the Wisconsin musical group Gomers, see The Gomers
as on The Gomers page, this is at the top helping direct people here:
:For the fan club family of the band Third Day, see Gomers
i hope this would be satisfactory?
Bifftar (talk) 21:00, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  link question / proposal 

message: The first person is inapropriate for an encylopedia article and some of the explanation are unclear. I will attempt to correct this. 24.137.78.34 01:21, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Before you work too hard, it may make sense to revert back to the May 5 version of the page...At that point it was in pretty good shape. -Rholton 01:31, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Dang, I didn't check that. Oh well it's mostly done now. Except for that bit about Gomers. I don't really think the whole long story is aproptiate, it sounds a bit like a sermon, not an article, but I'd like some one else's opinion who knows more about the band to see if they can improve it more consrructively. The best I could do has been done. 24.137.78.34 15:25, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm a fan of the band, but I think the current version lacks NPOV. Reads like a word-by-word promotional excerpt from their webpage. Thief12 14:06, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  style 

message: I received a message saying that this article was proposed for deletion, yet I don't see the reasons for this. The article was subject to several edits ending up in a POV version that seemed lifted from their webpage (as stated in the above comments) but I think I did a decent cleanup of it. Any words about this? Thief12 18:01, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Deletion

message: :Image:Offerings2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Offerings2.jpg

message: :Image:Offerings-AWorshipAlbum.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Offerings-AWorshipAlbum.jpg

message: :Image:Third Day Album Cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:19, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Third Day Album Cover.jpg

message: Anyone who wants to upload a free photo of the band or its members can find some at . The Evil Spartan 19:01, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some free photos 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Third Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070901212708/http://www.96five.com/page.asp?navstr=12,260&Pagecat=260 to http://www.96five.com/page.asp?navstr=12,260&Pagecat=260
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:57, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Third Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110111181114/http://www.weekend22.com:80/music.cfm?newsid=813 to http://www.weekend22.com/music.cfm?newsid=813
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060320212805/http://www.thirdday.com/timeline/99.htm to http://www.thirdday.com/timeline/99.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090525080129/http://www.radioandrecords.com:80/Formats/Charts/YearEnd/08/Christian_CHR_songs.asp to http://www.radioandrecords.com/Formats/Charts/YearEnd/08/Christian_CHR_songs.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:42, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Why does Wiki show that I made the change TO thrash metal when it was me who reverted the change? That makes no sense. I noticed someone had changed the genre from Christian Rock to Thrash Metal, and all I did was revert the change, with the comment "Uh... No" and for some reason, it makes it look like i was the guilty party. UtahCountryBoy (talk) 20:55, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: while  says "Reverted 1 edit by 71.75.51.112 (talk) to last revision by UtahCountryBoy" (emphasis mine). Can you provide a diff that shows you were reverted or made a change to thrash? Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:08, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

text: No it does not make you look like the bad guy. It makes it look like you had the last good revision. There is no edit that shows you to have added that genre. You're reading it wrong. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:30, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Happened There!? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Third Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.weekend22.com/music.cfm?newsid=813
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060320212812/http://www.thirdday.com/timeline/97.htm to http://www.thirdday.com/timeline/97.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060320212812/http://www.thirdday.com/timeline/97.htm to http://www.thirdday.com/timeline/97.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.1up.com/news/nascar-09-soundtrack-revealed
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:19, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified