lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Friends of God

message: Maybe this could be merged with German mysticism?  Nah, prolly not. But still, they're a bit too close for comfort :P Flammifer 04:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: All the information in this article is the product of nineteenth century invention.  It is what one will find in the Catholic Encyclopedia, published in c. 1910. Mauxb 22:55, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Factual Accuracy

message: Psalm 138:17, what is that? Psalm 138 has only 8 verses, and (if it's Vulgate counting) Psalm 139 has a verse 17, but not mentioning Friends of God. Best to link all to the Biblical sources, not only the psalm verse. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:33, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which psalm? 

message: I see two major problems here that need to be addressed:
1) German mysticism is a rather broader phenomenon than the Friends of God, including various other figures and schools such as Hildegard von Bingen, Nicholas of Cusa, Angelus Silesius, Jakob Böhme and his school, and arguably more recent figures. Mysticism in Germany is by no means reducible to a specific 14th century movement. Therefore, there really ought to be a separate page for German mysticism and not a simple redirect to this page.
2) The school of Rhineland mysticism, while considered by scholars to be close to the Friends of God and generally supportive of their movement, cannot be reduced to or equated with it. Meister Eckhart died 11 years before the Friends emerged, so it is anachronistic to cite him in that connection. Tauler and Suso, who did have interactions with that group, were largely considered orthodox Catholic friars. All three of them taught groups other than the Friends of God, such as the Beguines and groups of nuns, and all three were more closely tied to the Dominican Order as well as certain scholastic institutions (e.g. the University of Paris). There definitely needs to be a distinct page for this group of mystical theologians, because their activities are evidently broader than this page acknowledges.
Where was the merger into Friends of God discussed? Is the older page on Rhineland/Dominican mysticism recoverable? I would propose restoring that page and creating a new page on Christian mysticism in Germany that gives a broad overview of the various dimensions of the phenomenon. I am willing to do some of that work myself, but if anyone else is willing to help that would be much appreciated. Spelare108 (talk) 00:45, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading redirect; erroneous merger
Talk:List of German-trained divisions of the National Revolutionary Army

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:57, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: I edited the initial sentence, which previously described these divisions as Special Forces and provided a link to that article. These divisions were the best trained and equipped infantry forces of the NRA but were used as regular infantry in assault or defence. They were not Special Forces or Special Operations Forces as described in the formerly linked article, nor as those terms have been used since coined in the postwar era. Random noter (talk) 21:41, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content edits
Talk:John C. Fremont High School

message: Would information on where past Fremont students have gone to college fit in this article?
Eric323 04:54, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Early conversation

message: User:Fremontteacher has heeded my warnings about writing in a neutral point of view, to some extent, but I note from the user name that there must be a conflict of interest. John of Reading (talk) 15:22, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is suggestive of one, no?  But if they comply with the guidelines (which does not obviate the possibility of them contributing, that suffices.  I would suggest, unless there is consensus disagreement, that the COI tag be removed from the article.--Epeefleche (talk) 15:34, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest
Talk:Bristol Mountains

message: I added an image of the Bristol Mountains and removed the image request template.
--Epolk 16:48, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image added
Talk:Alemany Maze

message: Not all article needs to be a seperate page, dont be strong about that. This page is overflow because it is mention on that article. you know why the yellow tag is on that page, that page is badly written.--Freewayguy (talk) 23:03, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[San Francisco Bay Area freeways]] 

message: Merrging all of this article to San Francisco Bay Area freeways was not a good solution to weaknesses of either page.  At SFBa, it unbalanced the article, with a couple of paragraphs about Alemany Maze and a much shorter description of the more important MacArthur Maze, with a link to its main article.  I prefer the way that the MacArthur part was set up before, if Alemany and the other major interchanges were handled the same way.  It would keep SFBa from getting bloated and allow expansion of maze articles separately.  Just having a linked list isn't bad either.--Hjal (talk) 17:59, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging is not the solution
Talk:Utah Symphony – Utah Opera

message: The actual name of the organization is Utah Symphony|Utah Opera. Shouldn't the redirect be to the proper name, not Utah Symphony Orchestra? Doyn (talk) 21:10, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, this page should be "Utah Symphony|Utah Opera" unless there is enough content (or other reason) to move to two separate pages.  Given no other comments since 2009, I'm going to rename. Tvh2k (talk) 18:56, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper title of entry/redirection 

message: I think this would be better as two separate articles. All other opera/orchestra combinations are treated separately as far as I know. Comments? --Kleinzach 00:18, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anomaly?
Talk:Escalante River

message: I have two alternate photos which might be of use:
--R27182818 21:45, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate photos 

message: I think I have a picture (see page 6 as well) from when I went to the area a few years back; I just need to make sure it's actually of the Escalante River. If any Utahians (?) know the area, can you confirm that this is the correct place? --Mbell 19:38, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Image confirmed and added. Sorry about not adding an edit summary...is there any way to add one after the fact? I'll let TheGrappler decide whether or not to keep the photo request tag, as my photo doesn't show the river proper. --Mbell 21:10, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Request fulfilled as far as I'm concerned :) TheGrappler 22:08, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Initial photo discussion 
Talk:Big Cottonwood Canyon

message: I can't comment on glaciation perhaps originally carving the canyon, but the current form of the canyon, the classic "v-shape" described by another author, is definitely river caused. The quotation at the beginning may be misleading for this reason, if this was the original meaning of the quote.
Technically there IS a terminal moraine and till pile in Big Cottonwood Canyon where Mineral Fork meets up with the main canyon (Broads Fork and a few others do as well, but Mineral Fork is the most easily observed). Also, some of the ridges between Big Cottonwood Canyon and Little Cottonwood Canyon are formed of glacial tillite (particularly around Mineral Fork, Mount Superior, and Monte Cristo), but these are from a much older period of glaciation than what carved many of the other Wasatch Canyons.
Those details might confuse the text, so it may not be necessary to include them, but the phrasing in the article could be more exact. The article contradicts itself on whether Big Cottonwood has glacial or fluvial origins. Lastly, the second sentence could be split into two after "not to mention," and the grammar needs to be cleaned up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.37.76.41 (talk) 01:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Glaciation

message: This sentence: "Big Cottonwood Canyon is a watershed canyon, therefore pets and other animals are not allowed." is confusing. Canyons are all part of some watershed or another, and the connection between this fact and allowing pets in an area eludes me entirely.  The link to "watershed" in the sentence clarifies neither or these two problems; either this sentence should be explained more fully, should be linked to some article that does explain what is going on, or the confusing material should be removed (e.g., just state that pets are not allowed and leave it at that). Paalexan (talk) 23:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made the sentence more clear. Since the water from the canyon is used for drinking water, the canyon has banned pets to avoid contamination. --Glennfcowan (talk) 16:38, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sentence Clarification
Talk:Utah Olympic Oval

message: Does anyone know the capacity of the oval during different events? I have found really conflicting information about this, with the exception of the capacity during the 2002 Winter Olympics. I have read that temporary seating was brought in for the games, but then recently I have read that it always has the same capacity as during the Olympics. Any help would be appreciated! --Mangoman88 (talk) 08:17, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Capacity
Talk:Arctic Circle Restaurants

message: Who are the four actors in Arctic Circle's Mission2Pluto ad campaign? I've searched several times but couldn't find their names or if they've been in other ads, tv shows or movies. Bizzybody (talk) 17:11, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mission2Pluto actors 

message: The article and infobox contradict each other.  Do we have updated data?  Thanks. --Surv1v4l1st ╠Talk║Contribs╣ 16:07, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locations? 

message: I dejunked the origins section, which was a bunch of breathless promotional content taken from the company’s site. If anyone has other sources or details, it would be good to expand this section. Fenevad (talk) 17:20, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins
Talk:Calvin Ayre

message: Changes made. Wilipino (talk) 11:53, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested edit 

message: Hello... I saw that the Calvin Ayre page had added template messages that suggested the text resembled public relations, so I chose to edit the copy with significant reductions of what I viewed as excessive and unnecessary detail. These edits were reversed in less than an hour by Francis Schonken, which I don't understand, since I believe my edits did minimize the similarity to PR. Thanks. GorgeHoward (talk) 22:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question re undone revisions
Talk:Raley's Supermarkets

message: I've requested a new photo because the one image of a store that was in this article was so terrible that I felt it lowered the overall quality of the article rather than adding to it. It was dark and the subject was not really visible in the thumbnail. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:37, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried cropping it and brightening it up but it's still pretty bad. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:42, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:French M. Robertson Unit

message: I have removed the proposed deletion tag because a Google News archive search indictaes that there is a good chance of establishing notability. Unfortunately most of those hits ones which I don't have access to without paying, so I can't provide the sources myself, but I think that this should at least be discussed at AfD before being deleted so that other people can check out the references. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:15, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion 
Talk:Houston Zoo

message: Please add adimssion prices to this article.  It is mentioned that in 1988 the zoo is no longer free, but what are the current rates or the rate they chose to use in 1988. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.240.234.84 (talk • contribs).
:Provided admission prices isn't really what belongs on wikipedia.  Just simply click on the zoo's website link and you will find the prices there. As of January 19, 2007 it was $8.50 for an adult. Cburnett 04:05, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Admission prices

message: http://www.houstonzoo.org/pressroom/ is the correct link, not /press_room/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.64.14.2 (talk) 16:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Invalid Url

message: This section was unacceptably promotional in tone and nearly devoid of sourcing. It turned out to be plagiarized (largely verbatim) from the zoo's own promotional materials, which explains why it was wholly uncritical and chock-full of glowing descriptors and opinions that have no place in a serious encyclopedia article, including (but not limited to):
* "[They] were loved and respected by all."
* "[He] was a very special and talented individual...."
* "...his definitive book on Texas snakes."
* "...the incredible Zoo Friends organization."
* "This public/private partnership has proven to be mutually beneficial for everyone...."
* "[After] 2000, the Zoo ... just kept improving...."
* "[He] was a great spokesperson for the zoo and greatly elevated its stature in the community." 
* "[Her] passion and talent has helped the Zoo become one of the most successful non-profit organizations in the City."
In one revealing instance, the now-deleted section also retained the first-person perspective of the plagiarized materials ("Jim Brighton ... is designing our African Forest habitats"), and a whole paragraph was spent describing the zoo's future plans -- for 2015, which is now in the past. Given all these glaring issues, I thought it best to simply remove the section altogether. This article would benefit from an entirely new "History" section written from scratch using acceptable, objective sources. A major (and not uncontroversial) cultural institution of the fourth-largest city in the United States (not to mention one that received almost 2.5 million visitors in 2015) deserves as much.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.121.232.124 (talk) 09:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  I removed the "History" section for non-neutral tone, plagiarism, other issues
Talk:Western Technical-Commercial School

message: Most students disagree with many of the dress code policies which the school has adopted. They include wearing a lanyard in which a student photo identification card is attached. These policies are to prevent intruders from entering the school but are arguably ineffective as many students who forget or misplace their lanyards are sent home rather than actual intruders and many intruders who enter the school are not caught because many students do not wear their lanyards making intruders seem like any other student. However, the cards remain standard issue as administrators have not yet realised the inefectiveness of the lanyards. 
Many schools in the TDSB have a reputation as having lower standards and expectations as others, Western being one of them. 
As stated earlier, it is one of a handful of Toronto public schools to have a gifted/enriched program, but the program is considered to be not extensive enough by some as some specific courses are not offered widely enough in the senior grades and thus, students may have to take academic courses.
----
I remind the users that have written the above segment that Wikipedia is not a vehicle for your anti-lanyard agenda, the criticism of the administration, remarks about poor performance and excessive mentioning of high marks.
Taylor 06:34, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Very true. I've also removed the critical reference to an individual student's grade average, as this is flagrantly unencyclopaedic, and is IMO crossing the line into libel and e-stalking, and so does not belong in either the article or the the Talk pages. ★★Violet Fae (talk)★★ 23:22, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism
Talk:Pasadena High School (Pasadena, Texas)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www1.pasadenaisd.org/education/school/schoolhistory.php?sectiondetailid=13723&linkid=nav-menu-container-4-239710. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Voceditenore (talk) 09:16, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Dulles High School (Sugar Land, Texas)

message: Yes, John Foster Dulles knew about schools in his name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Datnotguy17 (talk • contribs) 14:09, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding Dulles' knowledge over schools in his name.
Talk:Gladys Porter Zoo

message: I added photos of the front entrance and of the GPZ logo and removed the request for photos notice. Although some pictures of key exhibits might be good to put up in the future. James E. Zavaleta T C E 09:04, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Added photos

message: This article needs to be re-written asap. The majority of it is a direct copy and paste from the <a href="http://www.gpz.org/history.html">GPZ History page</a>. Ultraviolet 23:59, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-write
Talk:Fort Worth Water Gardens

message: I changed the first sentence to start "The Fort Worth Water Gardens...". The Water Gardens are referred to as "the Fort Worth Water Gardens" by people in the area. (For example, see various articles at .) It sounds wierd to leave the "the" off, so I added it. The "Fort Worth" seems to have been lost after vandalism and a revert, so I added that back to. --70.254.165.67 (talk) 04:56, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First sentence
Talk:Federal Correctional Institution, Seagoville

message: I added a photo and deleted the photo request template.  Never having responded to a photo request template before, I hope that that was the proper protocol.  Heather 17:54, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added the interesting history of the prison, but it's my first time editing soooo...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sulilyreads (talk • contribs) 01:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yeah 
Talk:Federal Correctional Institution, Texarkana

message: I added a photo and deleted the photo request template. I hope that that was the proper protocol. Heather 18:02, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You did fine :)  Joe  I 12:48, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Media station (SEPTA)

message: The info seems to be accurate here, but the main reason to remove the template is that every station along the R3 line should have the same template if this is considered unsourced (or all removed?).  Feel free to revert it back but it doesn't make sense to me.  Smallbones 20:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  remove source template 

message: Does anybody remember the supplemental image of the Penn Central MU that ran through Media station back in 1975 ( "A PRR m.u. unit arrives at Media Station on March 15, 1975")? Was there a link to that image? ---------User:DanTD (talk)  18:50, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed supplemental image 
Talk:Imago

message: any relation to the japanese word "inago" for grasshopper?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.221.253.107 (talk) 16:03, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Term

message: Is it appropriate to have a nearly 4 MB image directly embedded in the page? 74.192.129.87 (talk) 03:59, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I second this proposition as I am one that was spooked by the image animation on the article preview. FrancOV19 (talk) 03:04, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large image
Talk:Lucid Nation

message: Created the article because Lucid Nation is a big part of the garage-rock music genre, as well as riot grrrl. --Andrew 05:54, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "...has managed to keep under the radar of mass media for over a decade."  That's hilarious.  We all know how much bands hate media attention.  :-)  dbtfztalk 05:56, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If so, then she must hate you for writing this article, huh? --Mikeblas 15:06, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are you sure you want to word it this way? 

message: After reseraching them, they really haven't been influential in material way. According to their website, they have only played one show in the last 20 years. They seem to be very interested in self-promotion but haven't managed to accomplish much so I can't agree that they were a "big part" of garage-rock or riot grrrl. — Preceding unsigned comment added by COIRobotuser (talk • contribs) 22:23, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: September 2021 edits

message: After five years of editing the page, user Theinfinite314 has declared that they are connected to the band. The page has been cut down, but it may require further edits.  --- Possibly ☎ 20:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: COI editor

message: Stage name is not Tamara it's Tamra, those are also published pen names. I have COI as an associate of the band.Theinfinite314 (talk) 21:26, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , I've changed this to the  template—use that for requesting edits on pages you have a COI with. Perryprog (talk) 22:06, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

text: All done.  --- Possibly ☎ 23:17, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested edit

message: A solid source for the importance of Lucid Nation to the riot grrrl movement p.53, paragraph 1, Anarchism and Art: Democracy in the Cracks and on the Margins by Mark Matten. State University of New York Press, 2016. "Some of the best known bands included Bikini Kill, Lucid Nation..." https://www.google.com/books/edition/Anarchism_and_Art/sdWzCwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Lucid+Nation%22+-wikipedia&pg=PA53&printsec=frontcover I have COI as an associate of the band. Not paid.Theinfinite314 (talk) 02:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The request is too vague. Please state exactly what you want changed.   --- Possibly ☎ 14:42, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

text: Not done:  Poor formatting. Quetstar (talk) 11:03, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested edit #2
Talk:Ripe, East Sussex

message: The original note, asking readers to go to Chalvington with Ripe, is unnecessary. The village is stand-alone; it is the civil parish that is a combination of the two villages. I have removed the information originally contained in the other article to this one. Peter Shearan 05:55, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

message: In accordance with  the Wikipedia notes on writing about settlements, one of the recommendations is that, in order to reduce the number of stubs, villages and other settlements within a civil parish should be in one article. Hence the proposal Peter Shearan (talk) 06:28, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal