Talk:Emperor Nintoku

message: According to this article, Nintoku's reign was traditionally dated as beginning in 313, yet his father's reign was said to have ended in 310.  What, according to the traditional dates, happened in that three-year interregnum? Nik42 01:13, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traditional Dates 

message: It seems pretty important, but I don't know anything about the subject.  Also, why does it say that the other tomb is "probably" located there?  Does no one know where it is?  It seems like it would be large and noticeable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Quantumelfmage (talk • contribs) 03:19, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is there not a separate article for the tomb? 

message: The Imperial  mon (emblem) in the Notes section was removed in 2012 here. Zenwort's edit summary is clear and reasonable --img of Imperial seal removed, this was not used before the Muromachi era 
The use of this symbol is justified because this emperor and this article is an important part of a grouping of articles about the emperors of Japan -- see Imperial Household Agency (Kunaichō):  仁徳天皇 (16).  Does this rationale provide a good enough reason for it to be restored? --Enkyo2 (talk) 13:44, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it's historically inaccurate, and wikipedia ought to provide useful AND accutrate information, I don't see any sense. --Zenwort 15:30, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The use of this symbol is not inaccurate.It is accurate to note that the life of this historical figure and his misasagi are within the context which is considered significant and related to the former Imperial system.  The subject of this article remains similarly within the purview of today's Imperial Household Agency.  In other words, the kamon is a useful as a visual clue which links together 125+ articles.  This unique article is best understood and evaluated as part of a larger panorama of related articles, is it not?Please step back a bit, and look at this from a slightly different perspective.  Consider the use of the term tennō at the Imperial Household Agency webpage which is linked above.  According to Encyclopedia Britannica, [t]he term was first used at the beginning of the Nara period (710–784) as a translation of the Chinese t’ien-huang, or “heavenly emperor,” and replaced the older title of mikado, or “imperial gate.”  This fact does not de-legitimize the use of tennō by the Imperial Household Agency when it identifies misasagi of pre-Nara period monarchs.I wonder if it help to suggest comparing the perceived usefulness of the stylized chrysanthemum in ? --Enkyo2 (talk) 16:11, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Image of Imperial symbol 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Emperor Nintoku. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120207003146/http://narashikanko.jp/english/aria_map/map_pdf/302.pdf to http://narashikanko.jp/english/aria_map/map_pdf/302.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:11, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Was his tomb excavated in 2018? 173.88.241.33 (talk) 06:38, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Excavation of tomb