Talk:Stormfront (website)/Archive 3

message: I'm just letting you know that I'm going to add an entry regarding this sometime soon:
On the SF website an article by the New Times is reproduced.  Don is quoted as saying:  "We want to take America back....White's won't have any choice but to take military action. It's our children whose interests we have to defend." I will cite the New Times article and also note that it is reproduced on the SF website.  Stick to the Facts 19:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Stormfront allows to cite any mass media articles or other print works for the purpose of discussion, whatever they may contain. There was never a doubt about that. Poison sf 16:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  don black advocating crime on Stormfront website 

message: has everybody seen this foxnews(so.carolina) "story" (it's more of an ad if you ask me) on stormfront ???? I would say LOL, if it wasn't that serious.-- ExpImptalkcon 21:05, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fox Advertising Stormfront 

message: It's best to say it's a white nationlist supermacist neo nazi site in the opening sentence. then the media reports of why it's criticized. do not whitewash the glorification of adolf hitler either. Amoruso 02:10, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: don't whitewash what the site is about

message: The media group Bertelsmann, which is now reported as the forth largest music-media company in the world(World music market), did in truth historically publish Nazi works. Would a comparative section about this be relevant or would it be too inflamative and arbitrary to even mention. This section could, by way of historically comparing Stormfront.org and the Bertelsmann group,- display current morals, current/then parlance, economy, and the way that history is subjective due to being made of chaotic individuals and their economic system/culture, that Stormfront is part of these systems too and that the system of belief surrounding the observation of these things(Nazism) is determined by strange and subtle external forces. For example the genocide of Jews by Nazi Germany and the death's of Black Americans in Prison, both being arbitrary phenomena occuring due to economic political situations, different words and setups but the same physical outcome. A section about this could come under 'unsourced wikipedia content' or 'original research', but if someone was interested in the above idea as a section or possibly as an entire article, i would be open to help, with bibliography and other external references which must surely exist. In fact this information could exist on wikipedia already, i will do a search. I think a section about this comparison is important and relevant to maybe assist cleaning up the main article of Stormfront to being more objective and using a less passionate vocabulary.Book M 12:32, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: re-reading the above i would like to point out that i do not really know how much the website Stormfront.org has to do with the Nazi or Neo-Nazi, but in vernacular terms there is a perceptive link. Book M 12:41, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: disagree. your only touching points are "media" and "fascism". you could also compare it to "Der Stürmer" or "Die Wochenschau". none of them have a relevance to Stormfront.-- ExpImptalkcon 02:58, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stormfront.org and Bertelsmann Media Group comparison section

message: Have any of you come across an article titled, "David Duke is a malignant narcissist" on Stormfront? 69.167.103.146
:I am aware of it.  Stick to the Facts 04:36, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Duke is a malignant narcissist 

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landover_Baptist_Church
Landover Baptist Church is a parody, run by a hard-core Atheist, to make Christains look like fools.
Stormfront is a less obvious parody, run by hard-core leftists, to make Conservatives look like fools.
Both organizations, ideologically identical, use exactly the same tactics.  They hide information on their organizers, heavilly moderate their forums, they are deceivers, and they rely on conspiracy theories.   Wuggsy 06:53, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely untrue. Storm front is a legitimate racist website run by legitimate racist Don Black.Wikidudeman 14:20, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Landover Baptist Church and Stormfront 

message: On a more nitpicky note, this Don Black quote: "We want to take America back. We know a multicultural Yugoslav nation can't hold up for too long. Whites won't have any choice but to take military action." occurs twice in this article.  One of these should be removed, but I haven't yet decided which one.  Anyone have a strong opinion on this?  Acornwithwings 22:25, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant Don Black quote