lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Stacey

message: I found a reference to "Gymnast Stacey", a doll, and I did a search here but found nothing. Okay, I could use a search engine, now that I think of it, but what I did end up finding revealed some deficiencies in Wikipedia.
There is nothing under "Stacy" telling you to come here if the spelling is different. The alternate spellings of Staci and Stacie aren't dealt with in a convenient way.
The doll is actually Stacie Roberts. I did know it was a Barbie-related doll, but I had to go to the Barbie article to find her.Vchimpanzee ·  talk · contributions · 20:49, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger
Talk:Jönköping

message: "Jönköping is considered the second-most beautiful city in southern Sweden, after Gothenburg.". Which jury has made this ranking? --Andhanq 22:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I was surprised to see American spelling in the article. Is that the current standard now in Swedish education?Varlaam (talk) 06:05, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  US spelling 
Talk:Fred Emery

message: I've tried to put the material in chronological order, and created sections and wiki links. More work is needed, and I too was struck by the oddity of the above claim. --Memestream 13:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology 

message: The section "Summary of his work" contains parenthesized numbers (1) .. (4) which appear to be intended as references.  Some of the entries in "References" are not numbered or linked to, but there is no obvious correpondence between these and the phrases containing the numbers.  Ian S (talk) 18:37, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Category talk:People from Minnesota

message: Can we PLEASE try to get all the subcategories on one page?  There are only a few and it shouldn't be difficult to do.  Thanks.  Badagnani 23:02, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *I'm not sure what you are proposing.  They land on the pages alphabetically.--Appraiser 12:57, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Subcategories
Talk:Spunk (Sex Pistols bootleg album)

message: Added this as a new article. The sources I used are cited at the bottom of the article. Please check these out before requesting further citation evidence - it's all in those sources. :-) --DaveG12345 23:02, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Original Spunk Bootleg
Talk:Operation Golden Pheasant

message: Operation Golden Pheasant → US intervention in Honduras Propaganda names should not be used as article titles. Añoranza 11:17, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~''
*Support as per above. Añoranza 15:33, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If this is about the date we can use the title United States intervention in Honduras in 1988. If you think this operation is only part of the intervention please expand on it. Añoranza 04:05, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

text: In how far incorrect? Añoranza 04:05, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

text: In how far does participating in an operation make you think that its article should be entitled in a way that will give most readers no idea what it might be about? Añoranza 04:05, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As a participate - all paperwork and logs were titled as Operation Golden Pheasant.Oldwildbill 08:47, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes when I am not in the desert.Oldwildbill 11:36, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Add any additional comments
===Result: No move===
It is very obvious, no support for the move. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 17:20, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~''
*Support as per above. Añoranza 15:33, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If this is about the date we can use the title United States intervention in Honduras in 1988. If you think this operation is only part of the intervention please expand on it. Añoranza 04:05, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In how far incorrect? Añoranza 04:05, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

text: In how far does participating in an operation make you think that its article should be entitled in a way that will give most readers no idea what it might be about? Añoranza 04:05, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As a participate - all paperwork and logs were titled as Operation Golden Pheasant.Oldwildbill 08:47, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes when I am not in the desert.Oldwildbill 11:36, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: It is very obvious, no support for the move. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 17:20, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Result: No move
Talk:The Castle of Fu Manchu

message: Actually, this is a mainly British production (one of the 9 Franco/Towers films). The IMDB info is wrong, as it happens very often. All the books on Jess Franco quote it as THE CASTLE OF FU MANCHU. Die Folterkammer des Dr. Fu Man Chu is only the title of the German distribution. Please, write me for every question. --Al pereira 23:06, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. At the end, the copyright is 1968 Towers of London(Films) Limited. (Cyberia3 (talk) 15:37, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: The source of the article on the main page is the film itself. How is life on Mars?(Cyberia3 (talk) 15:37, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Duh!
Talk:Blaster Master: Blasting Again

message: Just a while back, I posted a tag stating that the article was "under construction". Well, it also turnsout people have asked me to do several other articles, so I decided to put a hold on this one for a while until some of the other previous work can be done. It would be great if someone could do some work on this one, it wouldn't be too difficult, and is a HUGE game, so go nuts! Hucz 23:08, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I skimmed over the article a couple of months ago but it didn't seem that bad. Boy, how thigns have changed now that I cchecked it out again. I'm going to have to go nuts...this article needs work.--Claude 16:04, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding the "underconstruction" tag
Talk:Dreadknight

message: Can somebody with better english than me add some stuff about him in the new ultimate armor wars comics? --Baruch ben Alexander - ☠☢☣ 19:30, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ultimate 

message: This article is way too short and needs to be expanded the character's fictional biography needs to be expanded in more detail and the character's publication history needs to be added to the article since it is missing from the article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:14, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs Expanding
Talk:Rh (digraph)

message: I think this symbol is preferable in IPA to the one on this page /r_0/. Wikipedia doesn't have the voiceless diacritic in the table below, but here it is:  ̥ . I'm not sure if it will show up or being copiable, but let's see. Do you think this should be the symbol we use here? Interlingua  talk 23:13, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the most commonly used one.Cameron Nedland 22:47, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  r̥ is the IPA symbol for Voicless /r/
Template talk:Social Distortion

message: I'm going to remove the red links to The Hangmen and The Lewd unless someone has a strong objection. The title of that section is "Related articles" so an article shouldn't be linked to if it doesn't exist (imho). Downstream
:Never heard back so I'm going to remove them. Downstream 01:50, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Red links

message: I propose we create a new line called "Touring/Non-album members:" for those that were never on an album. Or we could just remove them from the template as it's getting kind of jumbled. Thoughts? Downstream 23:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Following up.. I didn't hear anything back and it was really bugging me so I made the recording members more prominent.Downstream 17:27, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Touring/Non-album members

message: I removed the related articles section as I don't see the direct connection between Social D and The Adolescents or Operation Ivy, etc. besides the fact that they're all punk bands and share some of the same members. Users can get to this information already if they are interested in those band members. I don't like having the dates in there either as it seems to "junk it up" and users can get this information from the Discography. Let's discuss it if someone feels strongly the other way or is aware of a standard on this issue. Downstream 20:21, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Related articles & album dates
Talk:Criticism of Adventist Hospitals

message: The statement appears contradictory. The fact that one hospital has settled fraud allegations, in no ways appears to be a criticism, but a statement of fact about the hospital willing to settle grievance. That another hospital settled a completely different matter in court pertaining to a completely different grievance, again hasn't anything to do with criticism. Also, the fact that only two hospitals are mentioned out of the thousands of hospitals in the U.S. doesn't appear to justify the statement whatsoever and falls under original research. Ste4k 10:58, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  contradiction
Talk:Jedna si jedina

message: The author's fondness is touching, but it's POV. Remove the POV and merge to the main article. Interlingua  talk 23:20, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purge and Merge 

message: May somebody elaborate why the two others community found themselves excluded by this anthem? -- Dans
This Anthem is good...It has words the new one is bull shit....This talks about the county of Bosnia not the Bosniak people...Why the Serbs and Croats don't like there own Country...????
I'm a Bosnian Croat and I love this anthem. In my opinion it doesn't exclude anyone, it even mentions the opposite. - Mayhemma  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayhemma (talk • contribs) 10:53, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for Elaboration 

message: Are the proper lyrics: "Zemljo hiljaduljetna" or "Zemljo tisućljetna"? Hiljadu is usually used by Bosniaks and Sverbs and tisuću by Croats, both words meaning thousand.80.80.40.208 (talk) 17:58, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics 

message: Song lyrics, even national anthem song lyrics, are frequently under copyright for many years after a song's creation. (See , for instance.) There are some on Wikipedia who feel that national anthems themselves should be treated differently (see Wikipedia:Lyrics and poetry), but this is not the official policy. Policy at WP:NOTLYRICS notes that "Most song lyrics published after 1922 are protected by copyright, and any quotation of them must be kept to a minimum, and used for the purpose of direct commentary or to illustrate some aspect of the style." See also Wikipedia:Do not include the full text of lengthy primary sources. Whether the lyrics of former national anthems can be included as some "special" fair use or not, however, translations of them are subject to their own copyright. And since policy does not make exceptions for national anthems (current or former), as the administrator reviewing this listing I have no choice but to remove the lyrics altogether in compliance with our actual copyright policy. Please keep in mind the policy at WP:NOTLYRICS in developing this article. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:52, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright concerns
Talk:J. J. Nickson

message: The only source cited in this article says nothing about work on the Manhattan project or about work as a medical officer during WWII. Did any of that actually occur? Was it the same person? —BarrelProof (talk) 02:31, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops, sorry BarrelProof, meant to respond to this a while back but it slipped my mind. The sources currently in the article don't confirm it, but the stated claims are backed up by some of the sources I listed in the move discussion above. Cheers!--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:10, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verifiability
Talk:Abies concolor

message: From "Flora of North America:"
* Flora of North America: Abies concolor
* Same: Distribution map:
Saturday, Jun 17th--Mmcannis 23:28, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Distribution map

message: Viewing many of the pages for this category, it seems "Essential Oils" image is being placed in the pages, is this actually an advertisement for "Essential Oils"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Patriot Woodworker (talk • contribs) 23:21, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Spam  

message: Visited Sequoia National Park last week and found notable differences between the bark of different tree species there. This Sierra Nevada white fir gets quite large there. Would like to see the text description of the gray bark augmented with some photos. 50.237.249.100 (talk) 02:41, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos of the bark?
Talk:Education Minnesota

message: * The 'controversies' section, I would argue, is not appropriate for Wikipedia. If articles on labor unions were to include discussions of each union's political positions, we would have lengthy articles which changed very frequently as politicians, political issues, budgets and union leadership changed. Additionally, the section made no logical sense.  The facts about the Crosby-Ironton strike were true (although vague; how hard would it have been to mention that the strike lasted 39 days and ended on April 7, 2005?), but the strike was not linked to the Pawlenty administration's policies. Nor, in my mind, could it have been; newspaper reports about the strike indicated that the strike was caused by the recalcitrance of the retiring school district administrator (who wished to make a statement against the union as a final act). It might be appropriate, I think, to include a section on EM's general policies, such as funding for schools, class size, tenure, NCLB, etc. But such a section would need to be referenced and be broader than the union's disagreements with the Pawlenty administration.  23:38, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Narcissism

message: Please change his to their in "used to discribe when a person treats his own body in the way..." RebornSociety (talk) 03:17, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 October 2023 

message: It’s a bit weird that narcissism isn’t thought of as a symptom of personality disorders but instead, as a way of being obnoxious 71.178.33.122 (talk) 12:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also a term in deviant psychology 

message: The word "echoism" doesn't appear on the Narcissism article even though the Echoism (psychology) article redirects there. Not sure where I could place a new section about echoism, but I also do not know what specific sources would be suitable for backing up the concept of echoism as a reliably sourced entry. There's some sources out there about "echoism", but some of the websites are on the Wikipedia blacklist, implying that these links are problematic and thus are unreliable sources. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 08:20, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Echoism psychology redirect
Talk:Cinematech

message: Hey guys, theres no need for a deletion or anything, cause apparently, this show is coming back, and this time, it's better then every before, so go and check it out, ok: 
* Cinematech Reboot
So I hope it helps, and hope that it soone becomes very useful for this article, ya know! ;)  Norozco1 (talk) 21:46, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reboot: the Show is back, and better then ever
Talk:Barbara Epstein

message: Galenet's Contemporary Authors Online gives her date of birth as August 30, 1928. However, its intro states it was 1929. For now, I am going with the more precise date unless we have different sources. Capitalistroadster 23:48, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth

message: There's also the Barbara Epstein, a left-wing writer, for Monthly Review and Z Media. See http://www.zcommunications.org/zspace/barbaraepstein Dogru144 (talk) 14:57, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Third Barbara Epstein?
Talk:The George, Dublin

message: edited age giving opening date and making it less like an advertisement. the eorge is dublin's oldest gay bar so merits the page! Previous unsigned comment was made by 89.100.207.169 (talk) at 15:20, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I believe that the history of this establishment goes back way further than 1985. First off, in the 1960s/70s, there was a bar called The George not far away on Lower Stephens St, somewhere near where the Drury Court Hotel now stands. It had a reputation as a discreet meeting place for homosexuals, at a time when such activities were completely illegal of course. I've no idea if there is any connection between that original location and the present one, or if it's just a copy/reuse of the name. 
But in any case, the current premises on S Georges St have been a public house with various names for nearly two centuries. We might want to try and reflect that heritage in this article; it shouldn't be too difficult to uncover more info on the topic. jxm (talk) 22:55, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Older than 1985? 

message: The article claims in the History section that The George "was the only large gay venue in the city" (I flagged this as ). The Hirschfeld Centre 
on Fownes Street contained Flikkers disco before The George and the venue continued after The George opened.
The article contains conflicting information about the year the pub opened as a gay venue ("In 1984 the area above the pub was transformed into a gay disco bar" and "Opened in 1985"). These dates are after the Hirschfield Centre opened during the 1970s.
While the mixed gay-straight Sides nightclub on Dame Lane might not have been a designated or dedicated gay club, it was certainly gay-friendly during the 1980s. Spideog (talk) 14:11, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hirschfeld Centre
Talk:Dicknail

message: This article has undergone an AfD with the result of keep/speedy keep.  See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dicknail. CanadianCaesar Cæsar is turn’d to hear 00:05, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Stuart Murdoch (musician)

message: The reference to a "faith healer" reported by Murdoch to have cured his CFS illness is sourced to a personal blog.  The reference has existed in this article for a long time, but it also currently appears to redirect to an unrelated article. (First appeared here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stuart_Murdoch_(musician)&oldid=290072815) Either way, it is not a reliable source so I will remove the information and the reference entirely.  See WP:WHYCITE  Mherlihy (talk) 03:57, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Faith Healer

message: This article could be quite a bit more organized. It tends to jump around. Someone who's a better writer than me should clean it up.18.246.7.129 04:19, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: General editing

message: The opening paragraph includes a fairly typical summary of who he is, but then the way it throws "He also suffers from ME." in at the end feels very out of place - shouldn't this only be in the Personal Life section? Giovata (talk) 07:14, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening paragraph
Talk:Media Watch

message: Media Watch (TV program) is the only item in this list that is actually called "Media Watch".  Shouldn't the TV program have primary disambiguation at that name and this paged be moved to Media Watch (disambiguation)? -- Chuq (talk) 01:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  ENeville (talk) 13:39, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation?
Talk:Dor (political party)

message: I put a "citation needed" tag on the following sentence:"As a result of the coalition talks with Kadima, Gil agreed to become a division of the Kadima party in return for the Ministries of Pensioners Affairs and Health."For the reasons, see Talk:Kadima#Citation tag.  I suggest any discussion be placed there.  6SJ7 00:30, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation tag 

message: Did the party split? I read that they have four ministers now. Valley2city 16:39, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gil split?
Talk:Cathar yellow cross

message: Anyone interested in creating an article on the cross of Toulouse ? John Bunberry 00:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

message: I think this should be merged with Cathar.  Upon reading the article, only the second section has any information that would not be included in the main article, and it is fitting to place it there.  The only information that is novel to this article is:
 
:# The picture of the yellow cross
:# The note of the forced yellow cross wearing
Both are minor points not warranting a whole article rehashing the Cathar plight
Amicuspublilius 15:21, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not very keen on this idea - there is enough here for this as a handy sized piece which is interesting enough to warrant it's own piece - with a reference  / link over from the main Cathar page. I'm not sure those subject to wearing a cross would find this a minor piece of information! The article doesn't re-hash the whole Cathar article - but merely sets the piece in a context for the general reader. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 16:08, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The article is also full of typos and POV wordings.  I'm sure members of the Church that were the majority at the time would find the POV to be more than a minor piece of information.  I must point out again that there is not more than a paragraph of information here, tops.  Amicuspublilius 04:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please help by correcting the typos and POV - this way we all get a better article! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:19, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 06:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Cathar]]?

message: I'm not sure where the rounded cross is supposed to go, but where it is put right now, it is not clear what it belongs to or what it is....someone with knowledge please correct it! 
da_baitsnatcha 15:53, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Layout messed up
Talk:The One: Making a Music Star

message: The bottom of the section for The One is an opinion. Wikipedia is not a place for opinions. --S-man 19:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not an opinion. That is fact. Also, mabie someone can move that text to The One: Making a Music Star controversy? FellowWikipedian 02:58, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The One

message: I think it says a lot about the interest level in this show that:
* The largest section in the article is about the CBC controversy.
* While virtually every other reality competiton currently or recently on the air (American Idol (Season 5), Canadian Idol (Season 4), Rock Star: Supernova, So You Think You Can Dance (Season 2), America's Got Talent 1, Big Brother (USA season 7), even Canada's Next Top Model) have contestant info and are updated after each episode with the night's events, nobody's tried to do it for The One. I'm not watching it (turned it off after 2 minutes on Tuesday), so I'm not going to be the one to do it, but if anyone is; it would be a good idea to be doing this... Kirjtc2 12:21, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Interest in the show

message: Are there any sources giving opinions on why this show failed so miserably? "Criticisms," that is?24.130.115.108 (talk) 04:13, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Reasons for the Fail