File talk:Replace this image female.svg

message: The centralized discussion page is now set up at: Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Image placeholders. A copy of all the debating here is in an archive attached to that page:  Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Image placeholders/Archive 1.
The discussion is now listed in the Centralized discussions box (see right), and at the project Wikipedia:WikiProject Free images. I've also linked it to RFC Style (not RFCPolicy) as suggested by Northwesterner1. 
I hope it's all OK. Please let me know otherwise - or go ahead and make the necessary repairs! Best etc. --Kleinzach (talk) 06:40, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for organizing this, Kleinzach. I posted a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography to publicize the centralized discussion further..Northwesterner1 (talk) 07:11, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ***Centralized discussion page now set up***

message: I can supply Legal pictures of Iga which will have no copyright issues. Unfortunatley the page is locked. I can email them  
(DigitalWebDev (talk) 05:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Iga

message: I keep encountering this thing in articles; not all editors are aware of the Centralized Discussion that nixed, by WP community-wide consensus, the use of this and similar images on article pages, and some are thus still deploying it. The status of this image as deprecated is very clear and needs to be made clearer (but it should not be deleted; the centralized and pre-centralized debates about it are of great precedential value, but would be rendered rather inexplicable if the image disappeared, as it is used numerous times in the course of the debate).
#Please place the following at the top of the image page: 
#Please also remove the HTML comment and transclusion, or at least comment-out the latter (and collapse the pointless blank lines in such a case). The transclusion in particular still strongly suggests that these placeholder images are accepted and directly encourages their use.
#The :Category:Protected redirects code should also be removed, as this page is not a redirect.
These changes should be applied to any and all images in this series. I have so far tagged two of them for this editprotected cleanup.
— SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 09:24, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: . — Huntster (t • @ • c) 09:32, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Not sure I agree, because the transclusion with the upload page still encourages use of the image. But I don't want to fight about it, so if someone wants to undo that part, go ahead. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 04:16, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe it's time to get a bot to simply remove all the image placeholders? --Kleinzach 06:35, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effectively disable 

message: Please add, 
Or similar language as users as still removing these citing the language currently on the page.  -- Banjeboi 01:45, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion .  -- Banjeboi 08:39, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Please add to text

message: 62.120.87.204 (talk) 00:12, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. Thanks, Stickee (talk) 03:00, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 62.120.87.204, 14 September 2010 

message: This page should not be speedily deleted because... I just proposed this for deletion but actually I am unsure what has happened. Someone just created this page and their content is being combined with Commons Content. The talk page needs to remain, but the page just created needs to go.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:31, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: So does a file not always end in .jpg? -Cupper52 (talk) 13:40, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: .svg