Talk:Rephaite

message: The Rephaim, and Anak were really the same group. Deut 2:9-22 solves this. They were actually not a race, but an elite faction whose imposing height, distinguished them from lesser men. and they would have intermarried (like egyptians) to continue their physical dominance, which has a scriptual indication of 6 1/2 to 8 ft tall, contrasting the 5'5 average male of the day.
The bible mentions several individual 'giants':
*Arba--renames Hebron,"Kiryat-Arba"c. 1700 bc
*Sheshai--ruler of Hebron c. 1250 bc
*Ahiman--ruler of Hebron c. 1250
*Talmai--ruler of Hebron c. 1250
*Og--Amorite Ruler of Bashen, at Ashtarot & Edrei, has bed 9 cubits long (13 1/2 ft). c. 1200 bc
*Goliath--Philistine champion from Gath. stood 4 1/2 cubits tall (6 ft 7)according to DSS. c. 1010 bc
*Ishbibenob--Philistine from Gath c. 975 bc
*Sippai--Philistine from Gath c. 975
*Unknown Philistine from Gezer, has 24 digits. c. 975 bc
*Unknown Egyptian slain by Benaiah son of Jehoiada, stood 5 cubits tall(7 1/2 ft). c. 1000 bc.
--207.225.65.89 21:28, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

message: The Greeks had their Heroes, Giants, and Titans, born from the union of heaven and earth, Gaia and Uranus.
Thus, the Hebrew had their traditions of mighty men (Rapa'm, and Napyl'm), descended from the union of gods and earthly women. That such an ancient tradition was part of the collective Hebrew literature should come as no surprise.
The Hebrew authors used the term "Rapa" loosely to describe famous ancient warriors of antiquity, such as the tribe of Anaq, (Anaq probably a cultic name) known for men of strength and size--that is to say, the tribe of Anaq had "mighty men" (Rapa) among them, and were even associated with the gods, as an explanation for their strength and stature (Numbers 13:33)
King Og of Bashan, (Deut. 3) and Goliath of Gath (I Sam 17) and his four Philistine kinsmen (I Chron 20) were all considered Rephaim. That there were pockets of gigantic men and their clans in Bronze and Iron age Palestine is likely based on a certain degree of historical fact.
Other inspirations for giant legends could also be based on ancient Dolmens and Megalithic tombs scattered around Trans-Jordan and Hebron.
Yet, at the same time, historical giants within the vicinity of Philistia are attested to as late as c. 600 BC, as we find mention in the writings of one, Alcaeus the Lesbian, for he writes of his brother (Antimenidas) fighting as a mercenary under Babylonia, and to much admiration of the Babylonians, he slew a warrior "lacking a handspan of 5 Royal cubits in stature." Antimenidas, probably faught in the seige of Ashkelon, 604 BC, or in some other conflict within Philistia-Judah. Yet Alcaeus himself mentions Ashkelon atleast once in his poems.
For the record, the Babylonian Royal cubit was 20.8 inches, and a span half of that. This indicates that the Giant Philistine slain by Antimenidas, stood about 8-feet tall, (with or without helmet). Such stature correlates with Goliath of Gath, who stood 4 cubits and a span (According to DSS and earliest Lxx), or about 7-feet.
--71.215.157.202 23:31, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rephaim and the Titans 

message: רפאימ cannot mean dead ones. at least not in hebrew. for that matter the root for dead/death-mwt is the same in just about all semitic languages: amharic/tigrigna mot-ሞት (with the 2nd literal being absorbed by the "o" sound attached to the "m") arabic مات-mat/موت-mawt  aramaic maut/mout-ܡܘܬ  hebrew mowt-מות. The dead ones would be מותימ see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mot_%28Semantic_god%29
also the רפא this root in hebrew is associated with healing the world to heal is לרפא. if anything רפאימ would mean the healers. cf. the angel Raphael רפאל
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raphael_%28archangel%29  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.253.202.199 (talk) 13:07, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:   Rapha'im רפאימ cannot mean dead ones 

message: I am sure that Ammonites is supposed to read Amorites!!!Michaelwild (talk) 18:35, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Ammonites?

message: Shorten description per WP:SDSHORT. Editor2020 (talk) 15:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short description 

message: Whatever the situation re the Rephaites actual size, there is no description nor any reference to Rephaites being giants or of unusual size in Genesis 14:5 or Genesis 15:20. This error should be deleted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.195.187.134 (talk) 21:06, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I guess I'll just take care of this myself. I will now eliminate the false reference to giants re Genesis 14:5 and 15:20. 108.195.187.134 (talk) 21:02, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

text: Its inferred from the use of the word in places such as 2nd Sam 21:20 2601:19B:4600:5D84:C58D:59A:F10D:143F (talk) 08:25, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size description of Rephaite