lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rudolf Spanner

message: This article really needs more biographical information about Spanner.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tchernobog (talk • contribs) 05:39, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

message: Why is Spanner's nationality skipped in the article? Didn't he have any?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.127.96.85 (talk) 00:43, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHY DON'T YOU MENTION PROFESSOR SPANNER'S NATIONALITY? 

message: everyone has their own story about soap and whats in soap.somepeople needs to know the real story about soap.can someone email me some true facts at l.i.lwest38@gmail.com  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keon jackson (talk • contribs) 07:36, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  whats in soap? 

message: The Polish version of the article cites the results of the investigation by INR as a confirmation that human soap was produced (albeit in small quantities), this version focuses on the alternative theory. Both articles could complement one another. Also, the fact that Spanner was a Nobel-worthy physician is a bad argument against his involvement in scientifically worthless experiments. It wouldn't be the first "great man" to feel they can do as they please with impunity. 89.64.14.110 (talk) 22:27, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: He was not involved in any experiments at all though. Thats the point. That some "soap-experimentation" took place is literally made up. He was just a normal teacher/professor accused to give the "concentration camp soap" myth (which was totally unrelated to Danzig Institute/Spanner) some legs to stand on when it became apparent that it was not true. --Havsjö (talk) 14:53, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

text: The very same article you are spamming the articles with by "freelance historian" admits that Spanner confessed to making soap out of human corpses.
--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 23:26, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That human soap is not part of the Holocaust. Nothing criminal is related to Spanners "human soap", which is why he was declared innocent of all accusations and is considered as such by the Polish state --Havsjö (talk) 16:44, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two one-sided descriptions
Talk:Fanuatapu

message: This is one of many senseless one-line articles of Wikipedia. Maybe after searching the whole web, one can make a three-line article out of it.
The point is, this island is one of four of the Aleitapu Islands. Does each of this tiny islands need an article of its own? Or would it not be better to have a comprehensive article about the group, where each island gets a section of a few lines?--Ratzer 16:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps you are right in this case.  --Seattle Skier (talk) 11:24, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Show Me Love (Robin S. song)

message: The actual Korg M1 preset is called 'Organ 2' rather than 'Percussion Organ' although the author is right in that it is a percussion organ sound.
How can this be released in 1990, when Robin S wasn't even active then ? See the info box - it says she's active from 1993 - present, so it is not possible for this to be released at this time.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.217.0 (talk) 18:12, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

message: I've come to notice that the article mentions that it has been sampled by Charli XCX and Beyoncé but how come "Don't wanna go home" by Jason Derulo is mentioned nowhere on the page. I canot see it anywhere. Pepper Gaming (talk) 01:02, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't Wanna Go Home by Jason Derulo 

message: Robin S.’s ‘Show Me Love’ Is Back in the Spotlight — As Are Old Disputes Over Its Credits Swayzeiee (talk) 03:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction to Joey Carvello attribution.
Talk:Wisconsin Death Trip

message: This page is kind of a mess, honestly. The book and the film are two entirely separate things, made by different people - they should have separate pages. The book, for what it's worth, has a place in the history of American photography and narrative; the film is a derivative work & probably less worthy of attention, even though it is more recent. dan visel (talk) 21:25, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure of the article 

message: I feel Theory of Negativity is notable enough to have a wikipedia entry.  I request an article be made.  --Emevas 16:19, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theory of Negativity 
Talk:Royal Moroccan Navy

message: There has been ordered a frégat ($500mln) by the RMN during the visite of Sarkozy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.71.64.132 (talk • contribs) 14:37, 23 December 2007
:Ok.  And?  This article already says that a FREMM has been ordered ...  --Kralizec! (talk) 19:54, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: FREMM class
Talk:CovertAction Quarterly

message: The website displays the last edition, #78, being from 2005. Is this to be taken as a sgin that the publication is now defunkt? __meco 16:25, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunkt? 

message: Any editors: I've enquired at book/magazine retailers several times in recent years & they always say it is listed as a current periodical but it's never in stock. I think for all practical purposes it should be considered defunct. I think a line or two should be added to the article about http://covertaction.org/ which hosts downloadable copies of all the issues from the magazine's inception in 1978 thru 2000. I've sent email to both the Covert Action website and the Cover Action Quarterly website for any clarifying information. The message to CAQ bounced "due to extended inactivity" at that mailbox. -Mal, 1 January 2008
:Contributor William Blum speaks about it as defunct here.John Z (talk) 06:56, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've used that reference in the article. __meco (talk) 08:24, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magazine's current status 

message: I suggest this page be moved to covertAction. Thanks 
2A00:1FA0:499:6764:0:55:91CE:BF01 (talk) 05:57, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  suggested move
Talk:A Day in the Life (Battlestar Galactica)

message: lowest human population count--158.123.153.254 16:25, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They've apparently been busy those pesky Colonials, jumps to 41,400 in next episode, hehe. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 16:28, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bad Luck and Trouble

message: I am going to change the spelling.g of "defence" to the customary U.S. spelling for consistency.  Grant chooses to place his novels mostly in the States, styling almost all characters, including the protagonist as ericans.  'Nuff said.  Rags (talk) 08:31, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Talk:List of Arkia destinations

message: Isn't Tblisi a scheduled destination, or Tashkent? I remember when I flew Arkia two years ago the magazine listed Riga, Tashkent, and Tblisi as scheduled destinations but things might have changed. NYC2TLV 16:26, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scheduled Destinations 

message: maybe it's not that needed  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.65.168.167 (talk) 20:30, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article hasn't been updated for 2 years.
Talk:Magisano

message: The User:The Anomebot2 put in coordinates of 39-01N 16-27E which agrees with the world gazetteer entry I cited, however Google Earth and the Italian article for Magisano both say the town is right around 39-01N 16-38E which is what I changed them too. -AndrewBuck 16:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Geo Coordinates
Talk:The Ford Plant

message: The  Ford Plant is a local phenomenon and holds little to no means outside of the city of Brantford. I'm surprised this article stayed. I really don't feel that a local music venue should have a wikipedia article. If that was possible, any small bar or club could have an article just because. - Anonymous  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.214.60.130 (talk) 12:46, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Film still photographer

message: Why is a still photographer not a stills photographer?
A car mechanic is not a cars mechanic.
A house painter is not a houses painter.
A book publisher is not a books publisher.
A school teacher is not a schools teacher.
A copywriter is not a copieswriter.
A runway model is not a runways model.
An Ear, Nose and Throat Specialist is not an Ears, Noses and Throats Specialist.
A still photographer, is not a stills photographer.
Jmedland 16:33, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Still" photographer not "Stills" photographer 

message: Should this be merged with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_still_photographer ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.112.14.151 (talk) 08:48, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate articles?
Talk:F visa

message: Pretty sure that F-1 students are allowed to work part time (maximum 20 hrs [or 16.2 mhrs {metric hours}]) only on campus of their respective school.--160.94.154.47 15:05, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: F-1 working status

message: Actor/Director/Buisness Man Sandes Ghimire (talk) 13:52, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sandesh Ghimire
Talk:0-3

message: Hello.
I am a member of WikiProject Medicine, a Wikipedia wide project that maintains and improves articles that fall under the scope of medicine. Since your article has fallen under our scope, I have placed the correct template(s) on this talk page for verification. Upon reassessment of the article, I'd like to make a few points, as shown below:
*Assess article with class and importance factors
*Added EMS task force
*
Leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! Renaissancee (talk) 16:39, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Reassessment for [[WP:MED|WikiProject Medicine]]
Talk:Said Salih Said Nashir

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 20:08, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Another useful link is the The Guantanamo Docket it is an interactive database provided and updated by the New York Times. The database is searchable and has the Pentagon documents (CSRT and ARB) included. Additional documents and reliable New York Times research regarding the detainees at Guantanamo are also provided. This is the link to the documents and research regarding Said Salih Said Nashir. IQinn (talk) 11:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rough work
Talk:Zunnar

message: Removed the "citation needed" since the Canada.com article clearly mentions the nature of the article which falsely reported on the issue. Also, moved a strangely misplaced sentence fragment. PotatoSamurai (talk) 18:38, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed 

message: Seeing as Wikipedia is meant to be based off of secondary sources and no original research, it seems that this article should be deleted unless someone can find sources to back it up. The only source cited is a primary source from the Pact of Umar as quoted in on a site dedicated to primary sources. Perhaps someone could either do the research to find a secondary source that explains what a Zunnar is, or the article is deleted? Khateeb88 (talk) 14:10, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research 
Talk:Baby Doe Law

message: this section refers to telephone hotlines that were established to enforce the Baby Doe Law.  To my understanding, the hotlines were established prior to the Baby Doe Law, following the executive order in 1982 which defined nontreatment as a violation of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.  I may be wrong, however, it has happened before ;)
164.111.209.233 13:30, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes in Regulations section

message: The article says this "The law went into effect on June 1, 1985, but was only in place for a few years before it was overturned in Federal Court" but surprisingly this isn't mentioned in the intro nor are any details offered for what is clearly a key issue when it comes to this law if I'm understanding this correctly Nil Einne (talk) 01:59, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Overturned?
Talk:Factual association

message: Since I have studied law in Belgium, I can confirm that this article is entirely correct. Berchemboy (talk) 21:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the "Verify" tag 

message: A factual association is a form of legal personality, and not a business related issue, so I have omitted the links to franchise and joint venture. Berchemboy (talk) 21:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing two "See also" links 

message: In the external link mentioned in the article, all relevant information and references can be found. Berchemboy (talk) 21:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the "Reference" tag
Talk:Fahd Muhammed Abdullah Al Fouzan

message: I think default sort is a mistake for individuals with Arabic names.
People with Arabic names don't inherit a surname, like people with an European do.
Traditionally the closest thing they have to a "last name" is their father's first name.
And it is absolutely clear to me that it is a mistake to use default sort for the Guantanamo captives -- because the US Department of Defense can't consistently figure out what their names are. 
Therefore I just reverted an edit where a well-meaning contributor imposed default sort on this individual.
Please don't impose default sort on these guys without discussing it first. 
Cheers!  Geo Swan (talk) 05:14, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I think default sort is a mistake for Arabic names
Talk:Fahed Abdullah Ahmad Ghazi

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 19:50, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Another useful link is the The Guantanamo Docket it is an interactive database provided and updated by the New York Times. The database is searchable and has the Pentagon documents (CSRT and ARB) included. Additional documents and reliable New York Times research regarding the detainees at Guantanamo are also provided. This is the link to the documents and research regarding Fahed Abdullah Ahmad Ghazi. IQinn (talk) 11:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: rough work
Talk:Zircon affair

message: There's a lot of overlap between these two articles, and in particular a satellite project that was never realised is unlikely to sustain it's own article- what is probably more notable is this article, which deals with the outfall from that. Rodhullandemu 23:57, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose, the satellite does warrant its own article, although I would support a merger in the other direction. --GW… 10:16, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

text: Sort of oppose. What is really needed is a page on the actual Secret Society series, with the controversy over Zircon and Cabinet included in it. The satellite itself should have a separate page. Nick Cooper (talk) 13:40, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger of [[:Zircon (satellite)]] 

message: Article currently contains this erroneous sentence:
"In early February Strathclyde Police conducted a raid of BBC Scotland's premises in Glasgow which lasted for 28 hours on 24 January 1987."
The raid on BBC Scotland's premises in fact took place on 31 January 1987.
My father, John McCormick, worked for BBC Scotland at this time, and was closely involved with the Zircon affair; he confirms that the raid was 31st rather than 24th January. He has been contacted by the BBC to contribute to their series of films on the issue due to his close involvement.
This date is particularly notable for him as it is his daughter's birthday; he was called away from the birthday party to deal with the police raid.
Thanks.
Stephen McCormick
mccormickstevie@gmail.com
:Stephen, I've done as you requested. The cites given for that statement in fact imply the 31 Jan, so looks like it was a mistake when edited in. The second cite says 2 days after 29jan, first cite says raid lasted 28 hours but gives no date for the raid. Sorry about that, and thanks for the notification. Rwendland (talk) 17:31, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I am closing this request as answered due to Rwendland's comment above. Z1720 (talk) 22:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request
Talk:Section 123 Agreement

message: The Indian government has overcome the opposition by the left front to the 123 agreement. I also survived a vote of confidence on the issue. The agreement is expected to move forward soon.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.28.249.38 (talk) 15:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How about a note about the recent problems with the USA - Russia 123?
http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2008/09/109256.htm
Hcobb (talk) 18:31, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russia?  

message: The Us And Philippines on fri, nov 17 (Philippines time) Officially signed the nuclear 123 deal.
Amids the Apec summit.
I'd like to request to edit the Philippines in, in the "Has" Section of this agreements. 143.44.216.50 (talk) 02:51, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philippines
Talk:AD 127/U/Kep/12/1966

message: *:127/U/Kep/12/1966 and PP 10/1959 → something else or merge with Anti-Chinese legislation in Indonesia —(Discuss)— Titles like these have just got to be violating some kind of wikirule.  Please weigh in. —  AjaxSmack  04:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to state your position on the renaming or moving proposal below.'
* Support merging with Anti-Chinese legislation in Indonesia . Article is too short to stand on its own and the name is awful. Davidelit (talk) 08:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move or merge

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming or moving proposal below.'
* Support merging with Anti-Chinese legislation in Indonesia . Article is too short to stand on its own and the name is awful. Davidelit (talk) 08:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Based on the disucssion above, I have merged the material from the articles here and here so :127/U/Kep/12/1966 and :PP 10/1959 can be turned into redirects.  All information including references has been preserved. —  AjaxSmack  22:54, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Bad originalism

message: This seems to me to be a POV fork, so I'm suggesting a merge. Originalism is a fairly long article, so it may be that what is really needed is some careful editing to note this concept in that article and then leave this somewhat in place. I'm not sure, though. Erechtheus (talk) 02:50, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree it should be merged.  This is a POV fork.Ferrylodge (talk) 20:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Originalism]]

message: This article needs to be made more clear and easier to understand. Also it is not clearhow prominent or notible this 'bad originalism' view is. Otherwise it should just be a 'criticism' section within the Originalism article. m.e. (talk) 15:16, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify please
Talk:Obshchak

message: The article should be rewritten. As the notion of common criminal fund is not Estonian specific, it is widespread on all the ex USSR territory.
And the Estonian specific data would be included in the separate section if it is relevant to the topic at all.Artur Zinatullin (talk) 10:14, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: The error in  from 26 February 2017, more than 5 years. 
There are no RS about nationality of Tarankov, only "родом из Могилева" (borned in Mogilev).
Correct.
— Yuri V. (t•c) 07:18, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  correction 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved.  Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Obtshak →  – WP:COMMONNAME: the most common form in English-language reliable sources (corresponds to romanization by the modified Library of Congress system widely used in academic and popular-academic literature).  —Michael Z. 22:59, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

text: In the last 35 years, the proposed spelling has represented 70% to 100% of the top two spellings. (The current spelling appears in an all-time total of about three books.)  —Michael Z. 04:36, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

text: Support per nom. I see that you've proposed a lot of transliteration changes, maybe it makes sense to do it in a centralised place. Alaexis¿question? 09:14, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the bigger picture might warrant a reevaluation of WP:RUS. But this handful of article titles each depends on the clear usage in sources of one particular name, so I don’t see the need for a combined vote.  —Michael Z. 14:43, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 December 2022
Talk:Occasional Conformity Act 1711

message: I think that this Act was repealed by the Promissory Oaths Act 1871 (c.48). It is listed in Part 1 (Acts wholly repealed of Schedule 1 to that Act (as the text of the Act appears in the Statutes at Large) and the Chronological Table of the Statutes (HMSO) does not mention a repeal in 1719 or any other repeal.
I also think the long title is not quoted in full.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by James500 (talk • contribs) 14:40, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of repeal seems to be wrong 

message: The Act outlawed the practice of occasional conformity.  What provisions did it enact that accomplished this? J S Ayer (talk) 02:49, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: as I read the law:  It applied to any national or local official in England or Wales who was required to attend Church of England services and take the Lord's Supper.  If such a person attended "any coventicle, assembly or meeting" of any other religion, they would be subject to a penalty of £40 and permanently barred from government employment. For full text see   Rjensen (talk) 04:52, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content
Talk:Bagman

message: Isn't a bagman a homeless person who wheels around a shopping cart full of his stuff? If so why isn't it it this article, or some other article?
64.163.222.115 (talk) 03:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The common term is baglady which redirects to the article on Homelessness. Why there's no male equivalent of the term with this definition I don't know. Nor have I ever heard of a shopping cart lady. :) -- OlEnglish (Talk) 23:15, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Homeless Guy

message: Perhaps this should be converted into a disambiguation page? -- OlEnglish (Talk) 12:41, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It certainly should. The term "bagman" is an old one and has a strong tradition outside of the USA and usually refers to someone with a legitimate function. In Canadian politics, it generally refers to a party fundraiser, and despite what one might think of politicians and their staff, what those bagmen do is quite legal; in Britain it's a traditional term for a club's treasurer once one leaves the lofty heights of government and guild.Stan Rogers (talk) 06:52, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: In British police dramas a Detective Inspector's partner is often referred to as a bagman. I don't know if this corresponds to real life.Elfonleft (talk) 00:59, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Notable example is in the series Endeavour, in which Morse becomes bagman for Detective Inspector Thursday, so perhaps someone can clear this up and add an ecxplanation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.101.54.196 (talk) 21:21, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  British Police Drama