lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Grand Portage, Minnesota

message: Please change "Ontario" to "Northwestern Ontario".  We who live in "NWO" identify as a completely separate region from 'ontario'.  Think: West Virginia versus Virginia, except even more so (we are 1,000 miles away from Toronto and Toronto considers us a bunch of rednecks and hillbillies anyway).  Since we are completely shut out of the booming 'ontario' economy, we have nothing in common with them; indeed, we have much more in common with Grand Portage, Minnesota, and the rest of the Upper Midwest.  Thank you.
Such a change seems unneeded, even though I live in Minnesota I know that just because Thunder Bay is very similiar to most cities, Toronto is MUCH different.  Besides Northwestern Ontario could cause some confusion.65.126.173.217 22:39, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

message: It seems very strange that this article is missing a history section. Grand Portage was extremely important in the history of North America before the 19th century. Quite frankly, had it not been for the technicalities of how the treaties were worked out between the U.S. and Britain, Grand Portage very well might have become a major North American city.
A history section here would seem essential. Check out
:The Grand Portage story (there are many, many other accounts as well)
--Mcorazao (talk) 20:56, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Added a short history stub as a placeholder. --Mcorazao (talk) 21:15, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 
Talk:Lower Wekiva River Preserve State Park

message: The article cites the city of Sanford and Lake County as locations.  But Sanford is located in Seminole County, not Lake County.  Which is correct here? Gamweb (talk) 19:53, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The nearest major city is Sanford. Checking further, though, I found it's in Lake and Seminole counties. Updated article to reflect this. Cheers! :) --Ebyabe (talk) 23:36, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Which County?
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Child pornography search terms

message: : Moved here from main page. Inappropriate use of bolding removed. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 07:08, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Criminal behavior on Wikipedia

message: This was listed on a wikiproject (see WP:PAW#2005) and I'm trying to properly sort these into chronological order. It was initially placed between 2 entries, the first dated Dec 31 2005 and the 2nd Jan 21 2006. I would like to list the date that the deletion was initiated. The problem was, since it was out of order, there was something that occured on Jan 14, 2006 and I am not sure whether to put this deletion discussion before or after that entry. I just added the years now so I am not certain whether it occured in December 2005 or January 2006. Right now I left it at the bottom of 2005 with a question mark. If a mod who can view the dates could help fix that it would be helpful for recordkeeping. Tyciol (talk) 20:20, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The article was nominated for deletion on 25 January 2006 and closed as delete and deleted on 31 January 2006 (both by me). The page was blanked and deleted on 28 May 2007. Also on that date, an article by this title was speedily deleted by David Gerard ("Do not want. Deleting per CSD:WTF."). I cannot view any revisions (or even edit summaries) of either version so I presume that they have all been removed per WP:OVERSIGHT (I don't know if there is a way to check). I hope that helps. Thryduulf (talk) 09:48, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Date
Talk:WLMB

message: I have moved this article back to WLMB from WLMB-TV. Consensus on both WP:NC#Broadcasting and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations#Article_names is that the article name should reflect the actual call letters of the TV station. As can be seen here:  the call letters for this station are in fact WLMB. Any concerns regarding this topic would be best addressed here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations. —A 07:32, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name
Talk:Unus the Untouchable

message: can someone cite the specific issue in which unus apears in the ultimate x-men?
So far, as far as I'm aware, he hasn't appeared in Ultimate X-Men at least not named. 194.223.81.88 (talk) 14:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  specific issue 

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 17:53, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:41, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project

message: Unus could have died as his power pushed away all air from him. The moment he died, his power would have ceased and there would have been a sharp inrush of air to his body and lungs which could have started him breathing again, and reset his power to "normal".(185.181.236.101 (talk) 18:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Death and life
Talk:Philip Owen

message: Ugh, where to start. If I can find actual evidence to contradict these points I will go ahead and change the article myself, but for now I just want to address them.
1.
 His political longevity was not matched by widespread popularity
I don't believe this is true, but even if it is, where's the evidence?
2.
 His Non-Partisan Association party often publicly split 
 with him on policy disputes
I recall this happening in the last one or two years of his mayorship, but not before.
3.
 and led to some embarrassing compromises. 
Which were?
 As well, despite winning three elections (1993, 1996, 1999) 
 he never enjoyed widespread public support
See 1.
4.
 Much of his electoral success was attributed to a lack of capable
 opponents, as well as a general declining interest in municipal
 politics among Vancouver voters.
See 1.
*I agree with your points, anonymous user.  In its present form, it is a slap-dash article that does not address any of the issues of the Owen years (the Olympic bid, the Woodwards redevelopment, the dispute over "harm reduction," etc.), but rather reflects the original author's personal reaction to the character of the man.  If you could fix it up, you'd be doing us all a service, and I will be happy to help if you take the lead.  Fishhead64, 06:10, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh oops, didn't realise I didn't sign my post above, sorry about that. I am *really* not much of a researcher, but if I can find any reliable sources on the net I'd be happy to try to put some sourced material into the article. Any help would be most appreciated.--Anchoress 07:51, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Mentioning that he championed drug reform is misleading without mentioning that he initially opposed it vehemently, wanting to lock all the addicts up in a military base and hoping that, soon enough, they'd all be dead of AIDS.
Philologick (talk) 09:29, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drug reform 
Talk:Scarborough Shoal

message: It is so ridiculous to have random people on the internet stumble across a page on wikipedia about the Scarborough shoal, and for it to have maps right at the top listing it by a name the Chinese gave it "Huangyan".
Wikipedia being open to edit by anyone is a horrible characteristic, it means Wumao basically abuse this place, so we find so many pages of other country's islands and features and the page is using some name the Chinese call it instead, because Wumao love pushing their names for things to imply they own it. 
Sort yourself out wikipedia, you need to hire actual workers to keep on top of this, otherwise it's just like reading a bunch of Wumao propaganda half the time on wiki.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.170.1.253 (talk) 17:06, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia needs to hire someone to control the Wumao infestation
Talk:KUTV

message: It's not standard practice on Wikipedia for a television station's list of transmitters to be a separate article from the one on the television station itself. Is there a specific reason it should be allowed to stand in this case? Bearcat 10:44, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge notice

message: Given how large that article already is, I am against merging it to the main article. It keeps things organized. --milonica (talk) 22:08, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As an explanation of the history, the merge tag was removed in June 2010. It was added again to the list article in October 2011. In September 2014 the list was reduced to 6 notable people (i.e. have their own article). I have merged that list into this article today. It should be kept to only listing notable people who have (or should have) their own article. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 08:02, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Personality Merge

message: Why is this tagged with the 'Oakland Raiders Announcers' category? I don't see anything in the article that backs that up, and it doesn't seem to make sense to me.
But, perhaps I'm missing something. Anybody know? 
DaRkAgE7[Talk] 07:38, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oakland Raiders Announcers?
Talk:Lead crystal

message: Crystal (glass) → Lead crystal – {Lead crystal is a redirect to Crystal (glass), but up until I merged them there were separate articles about the same thing at Lead glass and Crystal (glass).  I feel that putting the article at Lead crystal will achieve the best of both of the titles of the merged articles.  The meaning of Lead crystal is as clear as, well, "crystal" (hehe sorry I couldn't resist) and will be less ambiguous than Crystal but more useful than Lead glass.} Pschemp | Talk 08:05, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
#Support Makes sense. 64.216.41.145 22:12, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Add any additional comments
Is there any data on the toxicity of lead crystal (the "lead" part makes it seem dangerous)? 70.33.44.69 00:08, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
#Support Makes sense. 64.216.41.145 22:12, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting

message: :Add any additional comments
Is there any data on the toxicity of lead crystal (the "lead" part makes it seem dangerous)? 70.33.44.69 00:08, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Would it be possible to add a section, or at least a distinction/definition of what "lead-free crystal" is? Davebug 18:48, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't it obvious enough?  One without any detectable lead. Alvis (talk) 06:06, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: definition of a lead-free crystal

message: Lead crystal is a glass, which is an amorphous solid. As such, "crystal glass" should be a contradiction in terms. Something to indicate whether it is indeed a crystal or if it's amorphous like all other glass would be a helpful addition to this article. I would add it myself but I don't know. James Callahan 23:41, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it crystalline? 

message: The examples given, wine and citrus juice, are extremes of the extreme end of the high-reactivity-yet-consumable-liquids scale: a solvent and an acid.  Shouldn't there be at least SOME mention of the degree to which plain old water takes lead ions out of the glass? Alvis (talk) 06:10, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality of "Lead crystal and food safety" 

message: lead exposures from lead crystal decanters.
69.107.14.34 (talk) 04:48, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  another reference 

message: How much dispersion does lead crystal have as compared with regular glass? If there is more, it should be mentioned, because it would cause rainbow sparkles. —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 15:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispersion 

message: Lead crystal was merged into lead glass. See here. Fuzzy (talk) 19:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging "[[Lead crystal]]" into "[[Lead glass]]"
Talk:KUPX-TV

message: This station was never called KOOG-TV and never existed on channel 30. Per earlier discussion, it's the license that matters in a station's history, not its callsign, programming, channel number or owners. The current KUPX - KUPX 16 - is distinct from the former KUPX - KUPX 30 - even though Paxson Communications owned both and traded with Acme Communications, and even though the studios were moved from Provo to Ogden, and later to Salt Lake City.  --dhett 07:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate history? 

message: I have completed a rewrite of the KUPX article, which describes the license history of the station as its official history, plus adds a paragraph about its intellectual unit history prior to the April 1998 swap. Since it represents an extensive rewrite of the History section, I have put the article temporarily on my workspace at User:Dhett/KUPX for the user community to examine before overwriting the current article. Comments are welcome; please leave them on the talk page before November 1st.  dhett 03:51, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New KUPX article 
Talk:KBYU-TV

message: typing "byutv" leads to this page (kbyu) instead of the BYUTV page which can be accessed by search "BYU TV" (with a space between 'byu' and 'tv')
how can we redirect a 'byutv' search from this 'kbyu' pages to the actual 'byu tv' page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.187.0.164 (talk • contribs) 20:21, 22 February 2006  (UTC)
:I have changed the redirect page at BYUTV to point to BYU Television instead of KBYU-TV. This should in effect do what the editor is asking for. —A 03:47, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added  style disambig links to the two pages. I've also changed KBYU from a redirect to a disambig page. —A 06:46, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: KBYU-TV/BYU TV

message: It's not standard practice on Wikipedia for a television station's list of transmitters to be a separate article from the one on the television station itself. Is there a specific reason it should be allowed to stand in this case? Bearcat 10:25, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion of merging these lists ongoing at Talk:KTVX#Merge notice. And a related deletion debate. Cool Hand Luke 10:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge notice

message: When did BYU TV (national version) start airing commercials? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:53, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercials?
Talk:KUEN

message: It's not standard practice on Wikipedia for a television station's list of transmitters to be a separate article from the one on the television station itself. Is there a specific reason it should be allowed to stand in this case? Bearcat 10:46, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge notice

message: 9.91 is the Audio Feed of KUER-FM with the Video Feed of KUEN Thewi2kbug (talk) 03:30, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Subchannel Add
Talk:KUED

message: It's not standard practice on Wikipedia for a television station's list of transmitters to be a separate article from the one on the television station itself. Is there a specific reason it should be allowed to stand in this case? Bearcat 10:43, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion of merging these lists ongoing at Talk:KTVX#Merge notice and a related deletion debate. Cool Hand Luke 10:33, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge notice
Talk:Complete Discography

message: I added an infobox, as well as a personnel section, so all is well now. --Switch 16:02, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tatamkhulu Afrika

message: If he was born on the 7th of December, and died on the 23rd of December, how could he die shortly before his birthday? Greenman 08:33, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:EE

message: Many definitions of EE are recently missing; I would revert the changes, because I see no rationale for removing many entries for things commonly called "EE" but given my relatively low status on Wikipedia I will withhold that action. Does anybody second my request for reversion? subxero (talk) 18:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Cite a source, please.  Google for "EE" finds matches for Electrical Engineering, Estonia, and more in the first 30 hits, but nothing for "English English". --DragonHawk 15:13, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

message: A quick check showed Estonia, Electrical engineering, then Everything Everywhere as the most popular articles with ~450K, ~300K and ~90K hits resp. in 90days (this DAB having ~50K). Note from this DABs perspective, "EE" is on the screen of 28 million UK mobile phone users, so I placed the technology section at the top for that (also bringing engineering to the top). I am not suggesting we create a primary topic due to it being UK specific, and possibly ephemeral. Widefox; talk 15:45, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most popular article
Talk:Parallel compiler

message: Er, I think this article is fundamentally wrong. Parallel compilers aren't used to speed up the compilation process; they generate code that has parallel sections (or more parallel sections) than code would if it were built with a regular compiler. Workstation users with four or fewer processors, even only one processor, will run multiple compiler instances in parallel to get better build speeds, particularly if the build ends up being I/O bound.
-- Mikeblas 08:44, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Greystone Mansion

message: Does anyone feel a list of films and TV shows using Greystone's interior or exterior is in order?  Its used quite extensively, Spiderman 1-3, The Prestige, just to name a few.
Hrhadam (talk) 18:36, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage in Film 
Talk:Buñuelo

message: I Interwikied this recipe to the Cookbook. - AKeen (talk) 19:35, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cookbook

message: It says in the article that these are snacks, does that mean they are snack food or pastries? Please notify me on my talk page if you leave an answer as I'm not watching this article. —Kri (talk) 19:34, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sweets or snack food? 

message: Hi. I took the liberty to remove the link to Luis Buñuel from the article. There is no relation between this food and the director, whatsoever, other than the name. Mrincodi (talk) 15:54, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to Luis Buñuel removed
Talk:Gold (Cat Stevens album)

message: Why is the title of this article "Universal record album", and not "Gold"? -- Mikeblas 09:08, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved it back and left a note on the user's talk page. Mrtea (talk) 15:47, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As the person who composed this article, I'd like to know who the asswipe is that made that stupid move in the first place. Mrtea, much respect for catching it while my back was turned. CJ Marsicano 20:37, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The history sees all, knows all: "23:45, 21 January 2006 Lizzy4121954 m (moved Gold (Cat Stevens album) to Universal record album)" RossPatterson 19:15, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Makaiju

message: What's ADV? --Masamage 23:59, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess ADV refers to ADV Films' official releases of the (subbed) DVDs of C and R. -- RattleMan 00:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha! Thank you, I'll add a link. --Masamage 00:13, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: The reanalysis of R had flashbacks to this time, however, all flashback episodes that refer to the entire season of Sailormoon ommited this section out. For example in th review of the previous seasons, SuperS special left this part out. Then in Sailorstars, it was the same thing. There were no flashbacks to this time. In fact all mentions of this time after this point seem to have been omitted except in th review of the season which isn't counted as a "real" episode, but a memorial. I thought this migt be somethin to include in this article. --Hitsuji Kinno 13:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is really interesting, and I'd say it's mentionable. When are their reviews in SuperS and Stars? --Masamage ♫ 15:55, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The SuperS Special where the Vampire episode debuted there is a review of the whole Sailormoon seasons up to that point. Usagi is explaining to Chibiusa (never aired in the US.) So Usagi narrates and boasts, however this section was never mentioned. Then there was another recap in Stars at the end of the series with images. None of the images from Ail and Anne ever showed. Each season had it's own memorial. However, these weren't so much "episodes" as recaps of what happened and teasers for the next season. The SMR one *did* show that section, but there was no mention of it after. Many of these memorials were half-adlibbed as well. The point though is that there seems to be no recap mention of the first part of R, like it never happened and is actually an AR....--Hitsuji Kinno 02:45, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Interesting Trivia

message: So very tired of the edit-war. Where is this spelling of "Anne" Granger coming from, anyway? Individual character names are not listed in the dub credits. --Masamage ♫ 01:59, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Could be from the Tokyopop novelisations by Tracey West?  -Malkinann (talk) 02:40, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anne
Talk:National Anthem of Colombia

message: DG (talk) 22:47, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

message: ¡Oh Gloria Inmarcesible! is a poem written in the XIXth century in a very exotic style (even for its time) to say the least...that's why the english translation seems awkward. It's well translated though and changing it into modern english will only spoil it. Rosameliamartinez 22:20, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Gracias, creo que tienes toda la razón en lo de las termópilas y ya lo cambié. Respecto a lo de la flor, no estoy segura...cuando se dice, "la flor estremecida mortal el viento hallando," el adjetivo "mortal" debe referirse al viento, no a la flor, sino se diría, "la flor estremecida mortalmente". Además el verbo "hallando" tiene que referirse a cómo halla la flor al viento, y la única posibilidad es mortal (por ello la flor busca refugio). Rosa 19:58, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation

message: "the one who died in the cross", verse 1; is that indeed how it should be understood in Spanish? As far as I am concerned, "on the cross" is what would be grammatically and logically correct.
::You're right.Rosa 21:11, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar

message: Where is that information coming from? cite please. I've heard the same thing about half a dozen of anthems "the best after the french"...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gark (talk • contribs) 18:02, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Recognitions

message: @ User:JMRAMOS0109--Maybe we could discuss translation on this page. It's necessarily a very subjective venture, but we could discuss proposed changes. I boldly changed your line "The virgin in her hairs," since that doesn't make sense. --Yopienso (talk) 17:39, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More translation 
Talk:Eric Britton

message: I see this article was somewhat already discussed at User_talk:Ericbritton#Autobiography.  Using the Google link provided on the article page  and while there are a number of results returned, I can't see anything noteworthy per WP:BIO or WP:N.  Can someone please make a case for keeping this?? —akghetto talk 09:54, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Autobiography

message: Having talked to Eric about this Wikipedia article, we are both agreed that the best thing we can do is to leave it open to the Wikipedia process of collaborative editing, refining the content and style as we go along. Aboodoo 13:24, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Work in Progress