Talk:Doug Stanhope

message: When the so-called Campfire website is cited as being the publisher of Mr. Stanhope frontal nude pics, afterwards the pics appeared into Mr. Stanhope own personal webpage, I spotted it as being a sort of irregular advertising of external website, so I removed it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mister Nighttime (talk • contribs) 04:18, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Irregular advertising of external website

message: The article states he is running as Libertarian candidate.  I know he strongly supports the parties politics and in the past expressed how he votes libertarian, but I haven't seen anything on his site that says he will be running with any association to the Libertarian party. --Twintone 15:17, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Its up on his website now.  He also mentioned on the dvd "The Austin Incident" that he's selling on his website.  He refered to his run for president as a "half serious goof."  --GregoryEvans01 16:05, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Presidential campaign, libertarian?

message: I've protected this page temporarily due to edit warring.  If you would all like to discuss your changes here on the talk page, I'd appreciate it.  --Kbdank71 17:06, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Protection

message: From the man himself:  "An unexpected outpouring of support from factions of the Libertarian Party has solidified my decision to run for the nomination as the Libertarian candidate."
:Great thanks! --Twintone 19:37, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proof of libertarian ties

message: I read a while ago about a blog entry he had, where he bashed the Man Show saying it was juvenile, etc.  Does anybody have a link to this so we can possibly include it in this page? Chad Hennings 17:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know he does not speak fondly of doing the Man Show or the Girls Gone Wild.  On his "The Austin Incident" DVD he compares his doing the Man show to people who believe the camera steals your soul.--Twintone 17:57, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I've only heard it mentioned during his live shows, I haven't seen it printed anywhere.  Besides the Austin Incident DVD its also mentioned on his XM Radio show that they've played a couple of times. --GregoryEvans01 19:43, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Anti/Man Show blog?

message: Can we get a better photo of Doug up? I know Chris Saunders the photographer and am sure he wouldn't mind if one of his shots was used. I put a temporary one of him up that I took this weekend in Cincinnati, just until someone can get a better photo up.  Someone PLEASE get a better photo up. --JerryLewisOverdrive 03:14, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I just uploaded one from a show in Manchester too . Someone want to email Doug and see if he has a photo he'd like us to use?--Twintone 16:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'll try to take a better pic in a couple of months when I see Stanhope perform here in Austin, TX.  Modul8r (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:52, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject class rating

message: :Image:Stanhope.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 08:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Stanhope.jpg

message: "By January of 2008, all production on the show was believed to have ended. The official reason given was that production deadlines set in the contract could not be met because of the 2007–2008 Writers Guild of America strike, though many feel that Doug's deteriorating health may have been a more likely reason. In Doug's words, "They were afraid that my cancer wouldn't get the kind of ratings that their other cancers got. You can't compete with American Gladiators with a couple melanomas. This is 2008. It's sloppy, dangling throat tumors or pack your shit and get the hell out. Well, my shit's packed.""
Would like to see some citation on this. I don't believe that there are any documentations of Doug having poor health. I actually messaged Stanhope on myspace in regards to this statement, as he reads and regularly responds to most emails. Here was his response: "Its wikipedia - where all my fans can make shit up... what do you think?" Jminternelia (talk) 18:36, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Doug's health

message: :"During the first show, he took ecstasy given to him by an audience member and is rumored to have felt good."
This entry is a bit suspect, how do you tag stuff for unsourcedness or verifiability or whatever? I'm not sure how you could prove someone took ecstacy without having evidence of a crime taking place that the police would look into. Sounds made-up. This sounds more like a rumour at least, and more of something that should have 'he said' tagged to it rather than presented as a statement of fact as it is currently worded. Tyciol (talk) 17:24, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ecstacy?

message: Video here where at 12:15 Stanhope says that if he had to put money on it, he would bet that 911 is an "inside job".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tk4-xeAvWqs#!
Can someone tell me why this addition was erased? It is straight from the horse's mouth. If you're going to delete it, give a reason. The fact that he thinks that the biggest attack on the mainland in US history is bullshit, is relevant. Certainly more relevant than his stupid tiff with the Palins, which somehow warrants multiple paragraphs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.183.234.192 (talk) 17:44, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 911 Truther

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Doug Stanhope. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://sanfranciscocomedycompetition.com/articles/great-dane-took-a-bite-out-of-the-competition-in-1995
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:59, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The podcast section was absolutely shameful linkspamming to each episode, and the descriptions were a complete WP:COPYVIO of content from the podcast site. Additionally, the rampant overdetail, which even include copyvio text about each sponsor, resulted in hugely promotional content, rather than a simple episode guide. The redlink editor who added it appears to be directly involved with the article subject, possibly as a friend or publicist. Whether it's that or simply an overenthusiastic fan, this was in no way appropriate, encyclopedic content. --Tenebrae (talk) 15:17, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Podcast

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Doug Stanhope. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://twitter.com/eljefestanhope/status/713345083081232385
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060813061428/http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk:80/theatre/reviews/article1218522.ece to http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/theatre/reviews/article1218522.ece
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Doug Stanhope. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://twitter.com/eljefestanhope/status/713345083081232385
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.facebook.com/officialstanhope/info/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006100218/http://www.laughspin.com/2014/05/20/doug-stanhopes-podcast-joins-bill-burr-al-madrigals-all-things-comedy-podcast-network/ to http://www.laughspin.com/2014/05/20/doug-stanhopes-podcast-joins-bill-burr-al-madrigals-all-things-comedy-podcast-network/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:53, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is currently no source for his date of birth. If you add one, you also add a reliable secondary source, or we remove it all. Elizium23 (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth requires a source 

message: Per WP:BLPPRIMARY we are unable to use public records to support assertions about living people, such as date of birth. A reliable secondary source is required here. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 08:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secondary source required