Talk:KAI KF-21 Boramae

message: :Image:KFX.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 12:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:KFX.jpg

message: Is there some translation error here?  The 40k pounds of thrust from the Pratt & Whitney F135 is considered to be extreme for a jet fighter engine and the Koreans really want to add 25% on top of that? Hcobb (talk) 15:34, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  50k pounds of thrust? 

message: Where exactly is the original research?  I spot like two refs per sentence here. Hcobb (talk) 04:29, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The entire specifications section, including the crew.  I actually meant to tag only that specific section however.  If there is no solid evidence on the specifications then simply leave them empty, more information will come eventually. -Nem1yan (talk) 03:59, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rush it to the OR 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on KAI KF-X. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091017094822/http://svt.se/2.22620/1.1731852/korean_anholls_for_lacka_till_saab to http://svt.se/2.22620/1.1731852/korean_anholls_for_lacka_till_saab
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111004133457/http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/news/indonesia-south-korea-launch-stealth-jet-project/456655 to http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/news/indonesia-south-korea-launch-stealth-jet-project/456655
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130215014827/http://www.angkasa.co.id/index.php/fokus/324-apa-kabar-kfx to http://www.angkasa.co.id/index.php/fokus/324-apa-kabar-kfx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131005011152/http://dmilt.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7259%3Aindonesia-mod-decides-to-continue-ifx-fighter-development-&catid=3%3Aasia&Itemid=56 to http://dmilt.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7259%3Aindonesia-mod-decides-to-continue-ifx-fighter-development-&catid=3%3Aasia&Itemid=56
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070209115424/http://www.koreaaero.com/english/major/fixed01_3.php to http://www.koreaaero.com/english/major/fixed01_3.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:42, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I think we should be careful about placing Indonesia into KAI's K-FX program as they're only investor and first hand purchaser not really involved in development in technologically way, there's no way Indonesia will get fully optional K-FX, what they're getting is very basic level of K-FX. Calling I-FX is totally wrong, Indonesia only invested less than 10% so far. Which is not acceptable when considering Koreans are doing all the hard works. --Korsentry  — Preceding unsigned comment added by KoreanSentry (talk • contribs) 06:36, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indonesian government involvement 

message: Indonesian Defense Minister leaked the name as KF-21 "Boramae" Farbne (talk) 02:18, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: [] —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 02:24, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

text: See Wikipedia:Citing sources. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 15:14, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Now known as KF-21 Boramae 

message: Test flight 19 July 2022, ref 7 dated April 2021 (bottom first para) , nice article today japantimes.co.jp "South Korea's homegrown KF-21 fighter takes to the skies for first time" 20 July 2022 
Japantimes.co.jp Sudzydoogiedawg (talk) 08:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Test flight 

message: Does anyone know if there are any plans to add the BriteCloud decoy to the KF-21? It would be a very sensible and cheap addition because BriteCloud decoys can be fitted to standard chaff dispensers. 2.25.65.76 (talk) 09:13, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  BriteCloud 

message: Does "GBU-39 SDB (Block 2 improvement)" refer to SDB II Stormbreaker or something else? 2.25.65.76 (talk) 09:14, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  GBU-39 SDB (Block 2 improvement) 

message: Wikipedia needs a WYSIWYG interface. 2.25.65.76 (talk) 10:34, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is Wikipedia so damn hard to edit (correctly)? 

message: Is there any other type of the KF-21? Is there a twin-seat variant? 2.25.65.76 (talk) 10:40, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specifications (single seat aircraft) 

message: What specific missile is this referring to? What is its name? 2.25.65.76 (talk) 13:00, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Korean long-range air-to-ground guided missile (Block 2 improvement)