Talk:List of Knights Templar

message: The Grand Master of the Knights Templar should probably be moved to Grand Masters of the Knights Templar, and linked from the main Knights Templar article, which currently has a duplicate of the information (except is better hyperlinked).  Elonka 04:28, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: When I started reading the list, I was thinking in finding King Arthur, although I didn't find him. I was thinking, did King Arthur was connected to them, was one of the knights, or even be a Grand Master? 
I have some supporting information that could prove my affirmation, but I shall put them later. First, one detail, I've heard and studied some facts and events that made me think of King Arthur being one of the Knights Templar. 
One interesting thing is that both King Athur and his Knights of the Round Table, and the Knights Templar were having quests and some events including he Holy Grail at the same time period(which both powers ranged until the mid-1400s). 
If you guys please help me about this or have any opinion, I would be pleased to read it.
Mr. Mario192 - 1/26/07  (UFC)-(68.56.105.191 00:37, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you joking? Adam Bishop 04:51, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  King Arthur and the Knights Templar 

message: I'm not sure it's worth keeping a list of every Knight Templar, considering that there were many thousands of them throughout their 200 years of existence.  Perhaps we should limit the list to only those members who either have their own articles, or potentially could have their own articles someday, by being a Master of a local order or perhaps a key figure in a battle somewhere.  What do others think? --Elonka 22:36, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I've removed the following from the article:
==Most important Templar Knights==
From England
* Sir Ralph St. Leger (1186 - 1202) 
* Sir Ralph St. Leger (son) served with his father 
* Sir Roger St. Leger, Master Templar 1216 
* Geoffrey son of Stephen, occurs 1180/1185 
* William de Beaulieu
From France
* Sir Jean De St. LEGER (1096) 
* Payen de MONTDIDIER (1130)
* Evrard des BARRES (1143 - 1147) 
* Guillaume de MALLAY (1286) 
* Jacques de Molay
* Hugues de Payens
From Poland
* Boleslavus Soltan
* Thibault from Halych 
* Mieszko from Lwów 
* Boleslawus Soltanowicius
* brat Fryderyk von Alvensleben 
* Jan from Halych 
From Germany
* Hugo de Gumbach
* Alban von Randecke Rhin 
* Friedrich Wildegraf Rhin  
There may be some good information here, but without links or any kind of references, and by the fact that it was just dropped in at the very beginning of the page, I'm uncomfortable with leaving it there.  Can anyone provide a source for how these knights are listed as the "most important" ones? --Elonka 21:32, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New list

message: Is this list ever going to be useful? Right now I'm not sure whether any of these people were Templars, or whether they are just the names of random people who thought it was funny to vandalize Wikipedia. We should just delete the whole thing. Adam Bishop (talk) 18:37, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concerns (still...) 

message: I have done a bit of cleanup:  Replaced ALL CAPs names with capitalised lower case versions, and replaced numbered lists with bulleted lists, except where it appears the numbered list is one of consecutive masters.  It still lacks a coherent style, however, with some sections having dates first, some names, &c.  If i feel like it and have time i'll take a look in a bit. Cheers, LindsayHi 05:38, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Reading this article I noticed the list of countries is based on countries who exist today.
A number of knights are listed to a country of which in those days they certainly did not belong to.
Someone who lived in Lille in the 13th century lived in Flanders - ennemy of France. On this page this person is listed in France...
A huge number of templer adherants (at least 2 of the original 9 knights) lived in Flanders - now part of Belgium. This region / country is not present in your list.
Kind regards,
G. CLAES
29-04-2012  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.164.178.221 (talk) 15:09, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: More than 10 years post factum, but... Well, basic history: the County of Flanders wasn't "the enemy" of France, it was part of France. Even though nowadays Vlaeminghskes want to deny this, it is a historical fact. Histarius (talk) 17:53, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  France is not that old 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of Knights Templar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051110055243/http://www.templiers-ardennes.fr.tc/ to http://templiers-ardennes.fr.tc/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051110014415/http://www.templariusze.org/templarroute/templarroute.htm to http://www.templariusze.org/templarroute/templarroute.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:25, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Can a 32nd Mason get in with THE KINGHTS,WITH NO PROBLEM!?
Lloyd 32 166.182.83.137 (talk) 22:19, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  CAN A 32ED DEGREE MASON  GET INTO   

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus for Knights Templar, moved for Knights of Columbus. (closed by non-admin page mover)  feminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 (talk) 06:12, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment - I'm not entirely familiar with either of these organizations beyond a basic knowledge that they exist, so my question would be is it common to refer to a member of each as a "Knight Templar" or a "Knight of Columbus". If so, then I would say it's best to keep as is. But if not, then I would support the move. estar8806 (talk) ★ 18:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't find much on the Knights Templar, but a cursory search found that the Knight of Columbus often refer to their individuals as members, and not as knights (1, 2, 3). Also, the literature here includes a mission statement that reads: “To actively engage Knights of Columbus members in order to aid the parish and sustain visible Catholic action through works of charity in every parish and mission throughout the Order, and in sustainable parishes to form the Round Table into a fully functioning Council.” Woko Sapien (talk) 15:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 December 2023