Talk:Genetically modified organism

message: Why is this article protected from editing? 50.107.133.126 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 19:39, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: To prevent vandalism and the like. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:21, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected articles 

message: Congrats and appreciation to all the editors who raised this page to a GA! --Tryptofish (talk) 22:08, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Congrats on GA 

message: Please remove this website:
wple.net/plek/numery_2007/numer-10-2007/908-912-koszowskigoniewicz-czogala.pdf from article. This is new website about nutres. Protector164 (talk) 10:54, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've retrieved a Wayback Machine archive from 2013 for this page and amended it to the citation. MagPlex (talk · contribs) 16:21, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 October 2020 

message: Hello,
Shouldn't it be "genetically-modified organism", as "genetically" modifies  "modified"? I don't know whether or not I'm right about that. Any input is appreciated. Thanks, DesertPipeline (talk) 04:55, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Has been without hyphen for years. Assume there is a consensus. David notMD (talk) 18:47, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

text: See MOS:HYPHEN #3, bullet 4. Generally no hyphens after -ly adverbs because they are already assumed to be modifying the subsequent word. –CWenger (^ • @) 19:11, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, CWenger. I hadn't read that. Regards, DesertPipeline (talk) 11:34, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyphenation 

message: During my research on crops and their modification it should be noted under controversies the companies that drive these controversial topics and how they are involved in the process of GMOS.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shantasukra (talk • contribs) 00:54, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  GMO companies and their involvement. 

message: Hello,  
I would like to add this into the controversies section.
The companies involved in the controversies how they function in the process of GMOs and chemicals tied to crop GMOs.
"Monsanto and Bayer have become one of the largest companies that control the seed and pesticide market in both the united states and Europe now that their deal is complete.  These are one of the major players in the GMO world that drive new innovative ways to have new GMOs this also includes Pesticides and herbicides that are used in crops."
--Shantasukra (talk) 01:02, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the addition. The generalizations are not in line with how sourced statements typically appear on wikipedia, and overall language is vague, "new innovative ways to have new GMOs" particularly so. I see that you are a student editor, and I suggest that you choose a different area of focus. If you contact the wikiEdu staff assigned to your class, they can help you switch. GMO-related pages are an area of particular controversy on wikipedia and subject to WP:1RR. Most GMO-related articles are also fairly mature articles, and are going to be hard for a new editor to make improvements to even apart from the 1RR issue.Dialectric (talk) 23:26, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies GMO companies involved