lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Flammability limit

message: Flammable limits and explosive limits are the same thing.  See D. A. Crowl and J. F. Louvar, Chemical Process Safety:  Fundamentals with Applications, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall: NY, 2002.  
Also, flammable limits are defined only for air.  They are normally at 1 atm and 25oC.  
LeChateliers rule is only an approximation.  It works reasonably for the LFL and less well at the UFL.  
The mole fraction in LeChateliers rule is a mole fraction calculated with other non-flammable gases, such as oxygen and nitrogen, excluded.
--Engineerche (talk) 00:59, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The table of examples is growing at a rather rapid rate and now seems to becreatijng am imballance in the article as it seems to be becoming a reference table rather than a few examples to illustrate the main text.  Shouldn't this listing be cut down in size?  Or failing that shouldn't there be citations for each assertion in the table?  Pzavon (talk) 01:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too Many Examples? 

message: Many years ago when working in oil field engineering I saw a graph showing the UEL for CH4-air rising to around 50% at high pressures (say, 1000+ psi).  Can anybody verify this and put up a citable reference? Casey (talk) 13:17, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  High pressure effect 

message: The beginning of the last paragraph in the introductory section of the article is only a compound subject; it is missing a predicate (or vice versa perhaps). The fragment is reproduced below for convenience (parentheticals removed for clarity):
"The highest concentration of a gas or vapor above which a flame will not spread in the presence of an ignition source." 8.48.91.162 (talk) 15:16, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete sentence
Talk:Flashover

message: The current entry for flashover seems pretty technical for the average Wikipedia reader and may be biased towards a certain school of thought, since it seems to incorporate some information that isn't in the upper-level fire dynamics book I'm looking at. Also, the fire service information seems to contain a local bias. --catseyes 23:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Floor level? This must mean 'sea level'? --Dan Bolser (talk) 22:09, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: No, floor. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:34, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ... and an incident heat flux at floor level of 20 kilowatts per square metre ... 

message: Video evidence from 2003 Canberra bushfires Australian Capital Territory Government Emergency Services Agency. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=83&v=5H1eVy6O3Fo&feature=emb_logo
David Woodward ☮ ♡♢☞☽ 11:35, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdoor flashover
Talk:Oransoda

message: The file :File:Soft Drink.svg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Soft Drink.svg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 21:39, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Soft Drink.svg]]
Talk:Langen, Hesse

message: My mother's fathers's father's 13-great grandfather, Christian Lang probably founded the town 64.136.27.231 (talk) 01:20, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: thumb|right|250px
thumb|right|250px
thumb|right|250px
:I took these pictures in Langen in about 1971.   Possibly Langen-Oberlinden or near the station.   Is anyone able to recognise and identify the street name please?
:Ich habe diese Bilder in Langen hergestellt um ca. 1971.   Vielleicht zwischen Langen-Oberlinden und dem Bahnhof.   Aber ich moechte gern wissen die Strassen Namen, bitte?   Und Danke schoen. And thank you. 
:Greetings/Gruesse Charles01 (talk)
=== Locations... ===
Yellow Beetle: Im Ginsterbusch, Langen
300px  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steevee (talk • contribs) 10:03, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Vielen Dank.   "Wichtig" und "dringend" sind gar unterschiedlich.   Mir ist es persoenlich sehr interessant, aber nicht besonder dringend! MfG Charles01 (talk) 10:32, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

text: Leider noch nicht findbar.   Aber Darmstadt war damalig von Langen mit dem Fahrrad erreichbar.  Frankfurt auch.   Charles01 (talk) 09:08, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Where in Langen, please / Wo in Langen bitte?

message: Yellow Beetle: Im Ginsterbusch, Langen
300px  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steevee (talk • contribs) 10:03, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Vielen Dank.   "Wichtig" und "dringend" sind gar unterschiedlich.   Mir ist es persoenlich sehr interessant, aber nicht besonder dringend! MfG Charles01 (talk) 10:32, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

text: Leider noch nicht findbar.   Aber Darmstadt war damalig von Langen mit dem Fahrrad erreichbar.  Frankfurt auch.   Charles01 (talk) 09:08, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locations... 
Talk:Pakola

message: Since this drink contains neither ice cream (as floats do) nor milk (as A+W bottled floats do) what does this mean? Is it perhaps cream soda flavor? 75.41.110.200 (talk) 05:42, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ice cream soda?

message: What does this mean? Have they launched a milk-flavoured version? Have they made a version which has milk in it? (or have they taken all the milk they own, loaded it into a rocket and launched it?)155.136.80.37 (talk) 14:18, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Pakola have also launched their milk." 

message: The page is being edited continuously with content that is not relevant. IrfanYashkun (talk) 15:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for semi protection of the article
Talk:Parsi Cola

message: The file :File:Soft Drink.svg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Soft Drink.svg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 21:22, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Soft Drink.svg]] 

message: The file :File:Soft Drink.svg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Soft Drink.svg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 21:36, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Soft Drink.svg]]
Talk:Fluoroscopy

message: The article lead read:
"Recent advances include the digitization of the images captured and flat panel detector systems which reduce the radiation dose to the patient still further."
Neither digitization nor flattening the detector panel inherently affect radiation dose.  Maybe these configurations are associated with higher instrument sensitivities, that allow lower radiation doses to effectively be used.
—DIV (137.111.13.36 (talk) 02:02, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This is now better addressed in the article. According to what I have read, the main reason that flat panel detectors allow reduced radiation dose for the same or better image quality is that they are more sensitive than X-ray image intensifiers; they do more with the same input (make better use of it). This is covered in the main article (flat panel detector) and in this article at Fluoroscopy#Flat-panel detectors. The main reason that digital imaging allows reduced radiation dose for the same or better image quality is that digital image processing and image analysis software make better use of the input (because signal processing can take tiny inputs from low radiation doses and amplify them while to some extent also differentiating signal from noise). Thus they, too, in their own way, do more with the same input (make better use of it). I am far from expert on these topics, but today in this article I merely brought together existing information and augmented it based on reading and lookup. Quercus solaris (talk) 23:34, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safety
Talk:Laichingen

message: Translated from dewiki--Buchbibliothek (talk) 16:17, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Pepsi Twist

message: pepsi twist is selling in turkey yet... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.247.100.43 (talk • contribs) 
CM Punk's Pepsi tattoo is not ironic. There's a whole other story with Punk and Pepsi, but basically he named the move the Pepsi Twist because of a pre-existing love for Pepsi (hence the tattoo). I really don't know how to edit the article to reflect that, though, since little (if any) explanation would be required. Nosleep1234 01:44, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Forward scatter

message: Forward scattering also applies to lights reflecting off of wet roads. It shouldn't be that hard to find a good source for it: https://www.google.com/search?q=wet+pavement+light+scattering Greg (talk) 22:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Making this article more understandable
Talk:Pommac

message: The creator of the recipe for Pommac was indeed a Finn in Sweden, but the Anders Lindahl that then marketed the drink was not the same Anders Lindahl who owned a distillery in Finland - apparently the people of Kellokoski have somehow conflated the two individuals. I have a copy of the mail conversation between one of the heirs of the (Pommac) Lindahl and the journalist who wrote the newspaper article that was used as a source for this conflation if anyone is interested, but apparently sv-wp has a proper account of the creation of Pommac. WnC? 11:36, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious material removed
Talk:Herald (disambiguation)

message: I propose merging another disambiguation page (The Herald) into this one (Herald (disambiguation), and making the previous page a redirect to the latter. This way all related articles can be located using one disambiguation page. An alternative idea is to keep both, and include some form of "see also" notice on each page. Other suggestions are welcome. -Tobogganoggin talk 23:51, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a good idea to merge with (Herald (disambiguation). Redirect from (The Herald) to it. --Timeshifter 02:05, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Only one vote (in agreement with proposed merge) after four weeks. I've completed the merge. -Tobogganoggin talk 02:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:German submarine U-953

message: The 8th-10th Patrols section here, for much of its content, relies on Herbert Werner's book Iron Coffins.</br>
This book has been subject of discussion on the Werner article talk page and at MILHIST: For the reasons given there, it cannot be accepted as a reliable source for historical fact, though as a personal memoir it is a useful insight into the thoughts and opinions of a German U-boat officer of the time.</br>
I have therefore re-written this section, and confined the content to information that can be substantiated by other, more acceptable, sources. Xyl 54 (talk) 22:31, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write
Talk:Qibla Cola

message: Editors Note:-
On looking at this articles history a mention of failure was in the notes, and there was reference to a BBC article on the firm going into receivership. But during the last 50 edits this had vanished from the current article and various edits had removed the prominence of the fact the company has go into receivership. On the basis that this is vandalism as the fact was from reputable source it has been reinstated, and moved to the lead section as the company is now defunct in the UK and not on going as a quick look would infere. The original removal would appear to change the POV of the article.  Added to WP Derbyshire as was a Derbyshire based company. - BulldozerD11 (talk) 20:19, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Receivership
Talk:Qoo

message: I Can't Damn it! The German and JAPAN!_! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.70.252.127 (talk) 14:55, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: For an China an for created language on 1999, An Created ads for 2001, Thank you For Qoo! 2404:160:A002:9305:1:0:8402:13B1 (talk) 12:35, 24 March 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The language of Chinese : Qoo
Talk:Four-gradient

message: Importance to math students: One of the first steps on graduate level. Importance in General: Between important fill & specialized knowledge (mid/lowmid) 
Two References have been added. The corresponding german wikipage has a non-english link. Maybe a link to Wolfram would be better
                                 Phi0618 (talk) 17:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance

message: The first sentence gets it backwards: it is gradient which is the more general concept. We take gradient, retrict it to four dimensions and space-time metric and only then get the usual four-gradient used in physics.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.156.47.235 (talk) 13:00, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It means the four-gradient is a space-time analogue of the Gibbs-Heaviside gradient (as the gradient-link makes clear). Though both these may logically (for mathematicians) derive from 1-forms in some abstract space, it would probably be safe to assume that historically the Gibbs-Heaviside gradient came first. --catslash (talk) 14:56, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Generalization of what?

message: As there seems to be some doubt about this, here are four works plucked from Google books which use \Box and \Box^2 for the 4-gradient and d'Alembertian respectively.
*Clifford algebras in analysis and related topics By John Ryan
*Differential forms in electromagnetics By Ismo V. Lindell
*Introduction to relativistic quantum chemistry, Volume 2006 By Kenneth G. Dyall, Knut Faegri
*The theories of chemistry By Jan C. A. Boeyens
Admittedly these authors do seem to be in a minority. --catslash (talk) 12:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Box symbol

message: Something is amiss.  I found a website claiming that although  \partial_{\mu}  is allowed,
 \partial^{\mu}  isn't and in principle, one is actually using a covariant derivative in Minkowski space. Some precision or clarification on that issue would be helpful.TonyMath (talk) 15:17, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the website? Or the info from the website?  There are quite a few 4-Gradient Usage examples that give valid physics using either a lower or upper index on the 4-gradient.  Everything I have ever read shows that index raising/lowering is valid on physical 4-vectors using the Minkowski flat spacetime metric \eta^{\mu \nu} in SR, and using the more general g^{\mu \nu} in GR.  My understanding is that covariant derivative is only necessary in curved spacetime GR.
208.104.19.227 (talk) 15:32, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Covariant derivative?
Talk:Quatro (drink)

message: I've seen a reference to this in the April 1986 issue of Zzap! 64, so I think this is decent rationale to change the date on this Knyght (talk) 21:56, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Availability

message: I have restored a couple of lines pertaining to the period of availability of the product in the UK, whilst leaving the other more dubious parts as deleted by the previous editor. If we are to remove all unreferenced content, then we have to delete the entire article. The "unreferenced" tag will suffice to show that the article shows no sources. Bretonbanquet 18:59, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Restoration of small sections
Talk:Lauter, Saxony

message: The two images in this article, other than the ones in the top of the infobox, cannot be seen because they have not been transferred from de:WP or uploaded to the Commons. Could some kind person do one of these things? I'd do it myself, but I'm working through a proxy from China and it would take me ages. Someone back home, or somewhere where the Internet is quick and uncensored could do it in a jiffy. Thanks. Kelisi 14:21, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invisible pictures 

message: The Lageplan images all need to be uploaded to the commons.  I have commented out the other image, and somone can upload it. Ksnow (talk) 21:00, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:Rivella

message: This reads like an advertisement.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.65.149.25 (talk) 23:15, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ad

message: I've removed from the article the sections that come from the following copyrighted pages:
* Rivella is about to make its debut in the UK
* swissmade.com
Momet (talk) 18:38, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation

message: The file :File:Soft Drink.svg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Soft Drink.svg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 21:22, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Soft Drink.svg]] 

message: The file :File:Soft Drink.svg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Soft Drink.svg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 21:36, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Soft Drink.svg]]
Talk:Yakovlev Yak-30 (1948)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:04, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Warsaw Barbican

message: Interesting article!  I do have one question though, should the term "Barbican" be capitalized?  It appears both ways in the article and I'm not sure which is correct.  For example, "...the Barbican was mostly destroyed, as were... cheaper to rebuild the barbican and the nearby city walls..."  So which should it be?  This should be standardized through the article.  Dismas|(talk) 01:23, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct capitalization 
Talk:Kaissa

message: Why is this labelled as a bad move?  ...Kg7 is the bad move, because it leads to mate as described.  Or is the point that it's a less bad move because white takes longer to win that way, hence having only one question mark instead of 2 or 3? — Smjg (talk) 20:45, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ...Re8'''?''' ?
Talk:FU Orionis star

message: This article should be about FU Orionis, not "fuoris" as it is written now, and most of the text should be in the article about the fuoris. But for now, it would be better just adding FU Orionis specific information in the beginning, and making a section
:the FU Orionis type of variable stars
:FU Orionis is prototype for, bla.bla.bla.
etc. where this section could be the starting material for the article about "fuoris" (whose name should be: "FU Orionis variables"). Said: Rursus (☻) 10:13, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the article was originally about the star type, I moved it to FU Orionis star and wrote a new article, FU Orionis, about the star itself. Spacepotato (talk) 01:25, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Object!
Talk:Steviol glycoside

message: The English article currently claims that one of the sugar in the glycoside is rhamnose, while the images of the molecular structure in the German and Spanish articles show only glucose moieties. Icek 10:26, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There isn't a contradiction; simply an error of omission in the German and Spanish articles. The German and Spanish articles should be fixed. There are plenty of references (this one for example) saying that rhamnose is a component of rebaudioside C and dulcoside A. Those aren't the primary components of the stevia plant, so the German and Spanish article authors probably felt no need to mention them. --- Amatulic (talk) 18:18, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, it's clear to me now. Icek (talk) 15:11, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction with German and Spanish articles 

message: The compound in the infobox is unglycosylated steviol. It should either be captioned as such or the image replaced with the glycosylated form which runs the risk of being uninformative due to compressed detail.Novangelis (talk) 17:20, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Good suggestion. There are many glycosilated forms of steviol glycoside. That's why just the aglycone is displayed there. However, I changed the label according to your suggestion. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:24, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image in infobox 

message: This article reports that "[Steviol Glycides] do not induce a glycemic response when ingested, because humans cannot metabolize stevia".
There is a Cephalic Phase Insulin Release (CPIR) for all sweeteners (artificial or otherwise) which would in turn result in a glycemic response, in particular, a glycemic drop.  Perhaps the article should report no "glycemic increase" rather than no "glycemic response".
See, for examples:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9062523
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4591378/
Scott Bowden (talk) 14:40, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: "All sweeteners" is a pretty big leap to conclude from a study that tested only three. I wouldn't call that a reliable source for such a statement. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:03, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glycemic Response
Talk:Castletownroche

message: In Historic Cork Gardens it says that these gardedns are near Fermoy. Castletownroche is near Mallow. Which is it? PeterClarke 22:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Annes Grove Gardens 
Talk:Landsberg am Lech

message: The Landsberg DP Camp was in the former Wehrmacht Saarburgkaserne. After its time as a DP camp, the base was used by a German Air Force missile unit; in the post Cold War era, it became a civilian housing area. The Landsberg concentration camps were in a different area. Also known as the Kauferring camps, they were 12 labor camps established to provide slave labor for the construction and operation of an underground aircraft factory built for Messerschmitt near the end of the war. Administratively, they were sub-camps of Dachau. As many as 30,000 prisoners were held there, and nearly half died, including many burned in their huts by Nazi guards who set fires to hide evidence before fleeing the advancing Allied forces (www.kauferring.com)
The Yiddish newspaper, published in the Landsberg camp, was the Landsberger Zeitung, not the Yiddische Zeitung.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.2.181.24 (talk) 03:16, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: DP Camp