lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Welsh principal areas by highest point

message: What is the 'height' above?  E.g., above some sea level? Hmains (talk) 05:15, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be Ordnance datum (sea level measured at Newlyn) but it's not usual to add that detail. Geopersona (talk) 20:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  height 

message: The highest points of the first two of these unitary areas are the slopes immediately east of summits which actually lie in adjacent areas. I've tweaked the figure given for one since, as a simple glance at an OS map suggests, it is unlikely to be true (and noting that no references are provided for any of the heights in this list). The highest actual summit within Torfaen would appear to be the north-western outlier of Coity which is labelled as Cefn Coch (574m at OS grid ref SO 2201 0939) whilst the highest summit within RCT appears to be Graig-fawr (558m at OS grid ref SN 9210 9610). In truth, both these names likely refer to the edges of the flattish tops across which they're written and the tops might more properly be referred to as Pen y Cefn Coch and Pen y Graig-fawr. Only referenced names can go in the article though. I've also noted the fact of the highest points of two further principal areas lying on the slopes, southern in these cases, of other higher hills. I've adjusted the figure presented in one case as seeming more likely than the unreferenced estimate previously given. Geopersona (talk) 20:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Update - Waun Lysiog doesn't feature at all! Closer examination of the OS map reveals the highest elevation within Merthyr Tydfil county borough to be just to the west of Pwll Mere, roughly 200m west of the high point for Caerphilly - it might amount to 531m. The latter, perhaps 4m higher, is closer to SO 082111 but it's probably technically correct to label it as SO 082110 on this otherwise unremarkable stretch of moorland. The highest actual summit within Merthyr Tydfil CB would appear to be Garn Ddu (462m at SO 0274 1240) (with the nearby and more shapely Cefn Cil-sanws just 1m lower) whilst the highest in Caerphilly seems to be the un-named 442m high northern top of the Cefn y Brithdir ridge at SO 1146 0497 unless the 460m ring contour indicating a rather minor northern top of Mynydd Fochriw is to be counted suggesting an elevation of c.461m at around SO 099048. Though some of this (all of it maybe?, given WP's need for suitable referencing and no Original Research) cannot go in the actual article, I've included these background notes in the hope of assisting any future unearthing of references. Geopersona (talk) 04:40, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: But have since added hill-bagging website as a general ref which backs up what I'd added - search county tops/wales. Geopersona (talk) 05:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Torfaen, RCT, Merthyr Tydfil and Caerphilly
Talk:Yndi Halda

message: I find it just a wee bit mind-blowing that they have "been compared to Mogwai, Godspeed You! Black Emperor, Explosions in the Sky, Mono, and Sigur Rós" since none of those bands sound alike at all. Sigur Rós and Godspeed You! Black Emperor don't even belong in the same grouping with each other, much less the other three. Eris Discord | Talk 02:12, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  comparisons to other artists
Talk:William Hurlstone

message: There is a separate article, William Yeates Hurlstone, which I'm pretty sure should redirect to this one.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.3.175.242 (talk) 18:16, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly should.  I've done it now.  --  JackofOz (talk) 13:04, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I tagged for  rather than , not bcz of the source listed as such -- the admirably diligent Iain MacFarlaine's unsourced bio is essentially a blog, not a reliable source  -- but bcz the book itself (the cited page, makes no mention of WYH, and 8 fluffy ones on its "About the book" lk merely list him among fellow students) may have been a significant source, as may the on-line paper on the Trio in G. In any case, the page lacks the ref detail that it deserves.--Jerzy•t 21:43, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: I have appended a "composer stub" to the article. The article is in need of a photograph, portrait, likeness, etc., of the composer. It doesn't have one. The only photo in the article is of the composer's birthplace, not the composer himself. Erzahler (talk) 17:19, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:Wm. Knabe & Co.

message: "Notable Knabe Testimonials"???? This article is a press release. OrionClemens (talk) 15:24, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed "Notable Knabe Testimonials". It was promotion. --Peoplefromarizona (talk) 21:09, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

message: True. I questioned this so went and looked it up. Even though I was born and educated in the South, I didn't recall Maryland being a Southern State. The article Confederate States of America, and another article online, made it clear to me that Maryland was indeed below the Mason-Dixon line (map) and was a slave-state; however, Maryland was prevented from seceding from the Union and was not a part of the Confederacy. What I also gleaned from the original source material (in text version or PDF reproduction) was that in 1853 the public thinking was already attuned to a division of Northern States and Southern states.
Just a sidebar. Thanks for making me think and research this. John Sinclair (talk) 19:29, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Largest in the South?
Talk:William Lovelock

message: I have issues with this article, which is largely unsourced. There is a second Australian-born composer, who kept to the name Bill Lovelock and is occasionally confused with William. It was Bill, not William, who wrote "Snowy River Roll" (the one sourced fact here). (& there was yet another Bill Lovelock in the USA who wrote a Nina Simone song.) 
I've done some information gathering myself in the past and will work on the article in a while.  
Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 07:57, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can anyone confirm this edit is correct?  Or find any other source that supports the March date?  Thanks.  --  Jack of Oz [Talk] 04:10, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems they're plentiful.  All good.  --  Jack of Oz [Talk] 04:25, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth change

message: This section has been steadily expanding over the years. Most of Dr Lovelock's major compositions are mentioned in Stephen Pleskun's A Chronological History of Australian Composers and Their Compositions, Volume 2: 1955-1984. There is also a fairly comprehensive list of his compositions on the Australian Music Centre's site, although this also includes work by the Australian-born song-writer Bill Lovelock. Another large section of his work is in the William Lovelock collection at London's Trinity College of Music. Rather than including everything from these sources in the article, I suggest mention there be limited to such works as
#Have a known date of composition, publication or first performance
#Are of significant length
#Have a significant place in his work
#And of which recordings or video performances are available
All items in the list will therefore now require a source that mentions most of these things. Sweetpool50 (talk) 20:36, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selected compositions
Talk:William Pleeth

message: ==Comments--
I'm not yet an editor & not sure when I'll have time to learn, I've just been to a page that suggests posting here if I see something wrong with an article. 
"In 1942 he married the pianist Margaret Good. They performed together for more than forty years and made numerous recordings together. They had a son and a daughter. After the war Pleeth's solo career and his recitals with Margaret Good reached international status." 
there's a link on Margaret Good's name but it doesn't link to an article about her, neither does it link to a disambiguation page, instead it links directly to an article about an American politician of an evidently different generation. 86.159.6.54 (talk) 15:56, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Talk:William Roussel

message: Online forums not published by professional organisations must not be used as sources for Wikipedia articles. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_source_examples#Are_web_forums_and_blog_talkbacks_reliable_sources.3F. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 21:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Street Metal forum as source
Talk:David Doyle

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Per consensus, primary topic.  – robertsky (talk) 00:38, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Respectfully, no other David Doyle is getting more than 3 page views per day, while the actor averages 350 page views. That is a pretty respectful margin compared to other primary topics that have been argued at RM. Schierbecker (talk) 21:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Support Per pageviews cited. I also don't really see anything that the other David Doyles did that would give them any significant notability over the actor. Dantus21 (talk) 04:00, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 31 December 2023
Talk:William Wallace Kimball

message: According to one of the Geoffrey Baer history programs on WTTW (Chicago by 'L', if I recall correctly), Kimball Avenue was originally named Kimbell and was named for an early settler.  This site states that person was Martin Nelson Kimbell, who arrived from New York in 1836, long before William Wallace Kimball came to Chicago to make his fortune. The name was changed during a city-wide street name unification project (some time after several major annexations led to a patchwork of different names within city limits), but whether the change to Kimball was in honor of W.W. or merely a typo deserves a reliable source. Kevin Forsyth (talk) 22:41, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kimball Avenue
Talk:Winston Riley

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20080518/ent/ent9.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 03:09, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Woody Mann

message: This biography of a living person is almost completely unreferenced.  Its sole reference is a single 132-word paragraph at .  Most edits are WP:PEACOCK and consist of unsourced assertions.  If the article is not substantiated soon, I intend to cut it back to a stub consisting solely of information from the one source provided.
Actually, I'm not sure that the cited bio is a reliable source; it was probably provided to the museum by the subject himself. TJRC (talk) 15:42, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Almost completely unreferenced BLP
Talk:Wrekonize

message: Support split - Discography section is becoming long and should be split to a new article entitled Wrekonize discography. --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:38, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: * Reply - , , actually, according to WP:Manual_of_Style/Music#Discographies, "If the discography of an artist, group or work becomes disproportionately large in relation to the rest of the article, it should be split". --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:09, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see. The discography section is twice as long as the article. Perhaps the rest of the article should be made longer instead. Alternately, are the mixtapes notable? Do they need to be listed using three rows? First, they're all self-released and so a note could be placed above the table indicating that. The date and format could be on a single row. That would save some space. If space saving and article expanding does not help address the disproportionate section sizes, then feel free to split. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:07, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrekonize discography  

message: I've looked everywhere for years now for that song you sampled from Booker T. & The MG's green onions it was an awesome story about an acid trip and i miss it where can i find this song? 2600:6C5E:547F:3067:FC97:34B9:8DFD:F7AD (talk) 17:58, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably too late, but, that song, "Green Funyuns" is available at Bandcamp here, as part of The Rooftops Mixtape here. Also available at the Internet Archive here, and on YouTube here. --95.99.94.82 (talk) 09:52, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to green funyuns?
Talk:Temporal single-system interpretation

message: I have just reverted the article to the version protected by WJBscribe on 22 May, pending discussion and  consensus regarding the changes that Watchdog07 wants.  WP:CON states, "Consensus is Wikipedia's fundamental model for editorial decision-making."
Watchdog07 has explained why he thinks his version is better, as he says in his edit summary, but he hasn't justified his proposed changes.  These changes seem highly  non-neutral to me.  In any case, there is as yet no  consensus that they should be made.  Please let's discuss and arrive at  consensus before making any major changes to the article. andrew-the-k 23:41, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with andrew-the-k's rationale. Since the article has only relatively recently been unprotected, it is important that major changes be agreed to on the talk page.  Editors should try to avoid edit waring and work on building consensus. The version that was protected is the ground zero. Sunray 22:45, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  This argument is scurrilous.  When a version of an article is  protected - which it is no longer - it in no way implies that it is "the right version".  Watchdog07 15:02, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hardly a "scurrilous" argument. As Andrew has pointed out, editorial decisions are made by consensus. Let us discuss changes to the article here and work at consensus. Sunray 19:02, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverting to protected version pending discussion and [[WP:CON | consensus]]

message: Sorry, i reverted the edits because someone change a lot of the text and i thought he might not have meant to do it. Sorry.  Sunderland06  16:50, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted edits
Talk:Wylie Gustafson

message: Anyone want to incorporate the information from the lawsuit article ? DS (talk) 00:46, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lawsuit
Talk:Yabby You

message: Additions from this blog(!) are a cut and paste. Needs editing to conform to acceptable levels for Wikipedia.--Egghead06 (talk) 08:06, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Midnight Raver

message: Re. this, while some of the text is similar, some passages that I have compared were in the Wikipedia article as far back as 2007 so could not have been copied from a blog post from 2010. More likely that the blog post was based on the WP article. Or am I missing something? --Michig (talk) 20:43, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio?
Talk:Yank Rachell

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 00:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Yanka Dyagileva

message: "Dyagileva was greatly influenced by Alexander Bashlachev, who was her friend, and Letov, her lover and mentor." 
There may be some inaccuracy or even original research in this sentence. In Russian sources there is no evidience  that Yanka and Letov were lovers. Letov and others (Manager, Tcherniy Lukich, Kuzya UO etc.) had created a huge mass of rumors about Dyagileva's life and death right after she committed suicide and thus there is no reliable information about their relations.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.204.138.41 (talk) 12:04, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Members

message: Considering he founded the band and was with them through to 2009, perhaps there should be more information about him and possibly other members in the group?  RIght now searching him on wikipedia just provides a redirect to this article. Centerone (talk) 16:09, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nicky Tesco?
Talk:María Morales (triathlete)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved to María Morales (triathlete). Participants agreed with the nominator's argument, but preferred to include the diacritic in the subject's first name. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 18:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Maria Morales →  – no clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC per page views  Joeykai (talk) 09:54, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2 July 2023
Talk:Aed Carabao

message: There was news that came out in the early days of the Coup of Aed Carabao supporting the coup. He has not made any statements against the junta or written any critical songs against it. For the record, this should be noted. Under the current dictatorship, it has been business as usual for Aed Carabao and the band. Carabao's past is one of social commentary and criticism but their silence on this important issue has been very stark over the past few years considering the human rights violations of the dictator and regime.  NaturalEquality (talk) 05:58, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aed Carabao's Support of 2014 Coup and Thai Junta
Talk:Judges' Trial

message: A great start. Use footnotes to tie references to facts in the article. Also, should have a lead paragraph that is only a few sentences, then start going into details. Aboutmovies 19:23, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start class

message: "All convicts were found guilty on all charges brought before them." Isn't this axiomatic? Of course all convicts were found quilty or they wouldn't be convicts. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.211.90.75 (talk) 16:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. One convict was found guilty of only a subset of the charges. Lupo 22:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New Wording

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: The article should at least state which judges were tried and convicted. Also added should be the length of the terms they actually served and for what reason. --AdeleivdVelden (talk) 10:01, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you read the article at all? It does. Here: Judges' Trial#Defendants Lupo 22:53, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names of German judges 

message: I am sorry, but one of the references is wrong. It is not about judge Hagemann but about a man named Kusch. There is nothing about Hagemann at that website. --13Peewit (talk) 21:39, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there is one sentence about Hagemann at that page. But the reference is still wrong; the cases of Oskar Kusch and of Karl-Heinrich Hagemann (born April 8, 1908) have nothing to do with the Judges' Trial. Hagemann was the German military judge who had sentenced Kusch to death; after the war, Hagemann stood trial for this before a German jury at Kiel, Germany. See :de:Oskar Kusch, or directly Walle, Heinrich: Die Tragödie des Oberleutnants zur See Oskar Kusch, Franz Steiner Verlag 1995, . (In German.) Anyway, I've removed that spurious reference. Lupo 22:58, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference wrong 
Talk:Yulduz Usmonova

message: What is her ethnic background? I heard that Yulduz is half Uzbek, but I'm not too sure. 74.121.61.225 00:10, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've cleaned up the article. Usmonova is ethnic Uzbek. She does not have controversial ties to the Uzbek government. Actually the Uzbek government doesn't like her for being too liberal. Nataev (talk) 13:34, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yulduz Usmanova 

message: The Bilmadim album which she recorded with Jah Wobble and Ernest Ranglin in a week in 2004 is absolutely great. I read a rave review of it in Mojo back then, heard a few tracks on radio and recently bought a copy. Great singing and wonderful, soft bouncy ambient/dub/triphop production that envelops her voice. Does anyone know if she's made more records in Europe, and if Bilmadim has been released in her native country?Strausszek (talk) 17:35, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think Bilmadim was released in Uzbekistan. This album is not listed among Usmanova's albums on her official webpage. We should write in the article about this album. Can you help us find a source about Usmonova's Western recordings? Nataev (talk) 13:40, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Western recordings 

message: Additional information. 74.82.228.26 (talk) 05:15, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  She made a pop music video approximately 1991, titled "Two Bum". It aired on World Link TV's World Music show. Still available on YouTube.com.