lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Our Lady of Lourdes High School

message: This article is terribly written. Surely, there has been MUCH history since there were separate schools built in 1970. For a fact, the old OLL building, in the city of Poughkeepsie, was no longer used for classes beginning in 1996. However, I am aware of sports practices taking place there until the Construction of the new Gymnasium in 1999. I am a 2001 Alumnus of this school, and surely someone can find resources to better construct this article. The PoV is not neutral, and the article is lacking factual credentials. Any suggestions? WiiAlbanyGirl 19:17, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly Written 
Talk:Optical theorem

message: why doesn't anyone defines what a "forward scattering" is!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.100.172.24 (talk) 18:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

message: The last step requires that:
   Re (f(0)/i) = -Im(f(0))
However the opposite is true:
 Re (f(0)/i) = +Im(f(0))
However, this will either change the statement of the optical theorem, or the physical interpretation after this line will need rethinking to explain another sign change.
I am not sure how to do this, but the statement of the optical theorem is probably right (matches textbook equations).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.110.5.90 (talk) 19:10, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Mathematica gives (Integrate[Exp[I k x^2/2/z], {x, -Infinity, Infinity}])^2=ConditionalExpression[(2 I \[Pi] z)/k, Im[k/z] > 0], hence the integrals are wrong.  Fixing it now.  2A02:21B4:1E66:8000:845A:81AE:AEC4:2411 (talk) 16:25, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in Last Line
Talk:List of renamed cities in Ukraine

message: It's hard to draw the line between the previous city names vs. names in different languages. But I would rather keep these two per info in the provided links, which indicates that the cities were rather renamed:
*Tarnopol → Ternopil (1934) --- per 
*Lemberg → Lviv (1918; Polish:Lwow, Russian:Lvov) --- per 
MapLover 03:03, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ternopil and Lviv where not renamed. We simply started to use a Ukrainian name instead of a foreign one. In German langiage they still Lemberg because this the German version of the same name. Similarly in the Polish language they still write Tarnopol. These were no more renamed than Cernăuţi's being "renamed" to Chernivtsi. Most cities' names sound different in different language. This has nothing to do with an actual renaming, like in the case of Yekaterinoslav. --Irpen 20:22, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old names vs. names in other languages

message: The possibilities for inclusion are nearly endless, but I think we should limit our scope to something reasonable. As it happens, Ukrainian Wikipedia already has a well-defined scope. :uk:Алфавітний покажчик населених пунктів України, які були перейменовані states:  That gives us a start and end date (although the latter could still be updated in the future), and a source to work with (as all current entries are unsourced). As the previous talk section pointed out, we need to talk about official administrative names, not just how cities were unofficially named (in other languages) in the past before they took on official names. In other words, we are not looking for exonyms, but for official name changes. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 12:24, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope
Talk:Orthomode transducer

message: In my opinion, the article belongs more specifically to "Electrical Engineering" (high frequency equipment) than to "Physics" (too general). -- WikiReviewer.de 12:44, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it's probably better included in the Radio Frequency Engineering  Read-write-services (talk) 12:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  There is no such WikiProject, so that is not an available choice.  Note that it is perfectly ok to put an article in multiple WikiProjects – this is very common. SpinningSpark 15:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electrical Engineering

message: Some small changes are the correct 40dB ratio and I need someone to check the isolation of what is the Transmission Frequency filter used to isolate the transmitted RF from entering the LNB, I'm not aware of a -100dB filter, I could be wrong but the equipment I teach Satellite Ground Station (SGS), technology, I think the common value is actually around -60dB at best. To whomever reads this, Please check if you can! --Read-write-services (talk) 12:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: 40dB isolation is not .0001%.  It is a ratio of .0001 but as a percentage it is .01%.  I have reverted your change.  On the filter, the article does not say the filter provides 100 dB isolation.  It says the filter provides additional isolation bringing the total to 100dB.  You say filters can be up to 60dB.  The 40dB from the transducer plus 60dB from the filter make a total of 100dB, as claimed, unless I am completely misreading that. SpinningSpark 16:10, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections
Talk:Oxygen-burning process

message: Isn't the 2 superscript on D redundant? It seems like consistency would be best, ideally any (non-1) superscripts on an H base, although the links could obviously continue to point towards the specific isotope's page. --Belg4mit 05:43, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  <sup>2</sup>D 

message: * Why are the two equasions under "Alternatively" in a seperate diagram? Why is there no information about the energy released?
* Can somebody add the required size of the star for oxygen burning to this page? (Similar to the Neon burning process page)
SkyLined (talk) 00:03, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style 

message: This page doesn't seem to say how many solar masses a star typically needs to be for the oxygen burning process to initiate. I'm assuming it's comparable to Carbon Burning (4 MSun), but could anyone verify this? --Xanthine (talk) 10:48, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Carbon burning process says it would have to be at least 8 solar masses (stars of 4 to 8 solar masses tend to lose too much mass).  But someone who knows this material should add it. RJFJR (talk) 20:49, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: We should distinguish between initial (maximum) mass of a star, and the mass of a star during a certain burn phase.Abitslow (talk) 22:28, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solar Masses 

message: "Once oxygen is exhausted, the core ceases producing fusion energy and contracts. This contraction heats it up to the point that the silicon-burning process ignites." This makes it sound like the temperature goes from high, to low, then back to high and even higher. But if the heat produced from fusion prevented contraction before, why doesn't heat from contraction stop that contraction later, before temperatures rise past the previous high? Maybe what is actually happening is that layers around the core stop fusing, or that convection stops? If layers cooled down, the star would shrink and pressure in the core would increase, causing temperatures to increase, even if those layers are still cooler than when fusion was occurring in them. 2601:600:8500:B2D9:437:47EB:9414:3B0E (talk) 23:50, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Understanding ignition process 

message: I have added a lot of new content to this page and used a few (9, I think) references/sources. However, I want to make sure these sources are agreeable and reputable in the eyes of the community, and that I cited all the statements that should be cited. It would be nice to do enough work to get rid of the refimprove tag on this page. Thoughts? Ncsu physics1 (talk) 19:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refimprove Tag Discussion 

message: Granted the interior of massive stars is the only location where these reactions routinely occur, but still they can occur elsewhere.  For example, in a type I supernova there is runaway fusion in a white dwarf, usually starting with carbon and oxygen.  Essentially the same reaction, but maybe some differences that could be mentioned?  Lithopsian (talk) 15:12, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only in stars?
Talk:Particle number

message: Both this and the  Particle number operator are short stubby articles. They would work better if they were in one place. Err, I'm sort of changing my mind. This article talks about air quality, so dumping a bunch of nasty QM formulas into it would be a bad idea. All this suggests that Particle number operator should be renamed to Particle number (quantum mechanics) and given a proper lede. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 00:33, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge from [[Particle number operator]] 

message: Conetituent particle 27.61.77.146 (talk) 05:58, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science 

message: Particle number (PN) is a metric used in air quality, which will get more relevant in the future in addition to PM2.5 and PM10. PN is a traceable metric according to ISO 27891:2015. I suggest to create new page for this metric.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsaturno (talk • contribs) 19:14, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Particle number, the air quality metric, as a separate page?
Talk:Oktogon (intersection)

message: Note that the text below should take you to a page with many links for different overhead views of Oktogon, but the tool appears to be disabled at the moment.  Should it ever start working again, please replace my existing Google Maps link with this:
* Maps, satellite, and aerial imagery of the Oktogon junction.
--Thisisbossi 03:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Maps, Aerial, and Satellite Imagery
Talk:Ananda Temple

message: Actually, it's Westminster Abbey, and the first three references the article links to don't support the quote! MeegsC | Talk 04:03, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "West Minister Abbey" 
Talk:Phenomenology (physics)

message: Since there are no comments, one could assume that Phenomenology(science) is not going to be merged here. As an entomologist using this approach, I would rather keep the more generic article rather than restrict the meaning to particle physics only. Against merging from the general topic to the restricted topic. Acuster 03:26, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Clearly, these article titles imply that the two articles should be very different. However, some/much of the content of Phenomenology (science) should be copied into this article. linas 00:09, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure that there is much in Phenomenology (science) that would add value to this article.  Even though that article starts out with "The term phenomenology in high energy physics...", most of the discussion doesn't really have much to do with what particle physics phenomenology actually is.  The way the word phenomenology is used in Phenomenology (science) is very different from what particle physics phenomenologists mean when we use it.  HEL 22:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge

message: Or at least say that it is distinctly separate from the idea of Phenomenology (science).  Physicsmichael (talk) 10:37, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page should define phenomenology as it applies to this topic 

message: The page currently describes phenomenology as making predictions with experimental data, as opposed to the scientific method which performs experiments to test a theory. 
But ... isn't that exactly the same thing?  When you apply a theory to make some predictions,  aren't you testing the underlying theory?  
Wouldn't it be more accurate to describe phenomenology as a particular application of the scientific method?
If this is not the case then perhaps the page should explain more clearly the difference between the two.
79.168.216.158 (talk) 15:20, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Polar Apposite (talk) 18:58, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't "phenomenology" just a particular application of the "scientific method"? 

message: I have some doubts that the noun phenomenology is used by physicists in the narrow and strange sense described here. Instead, they use the adjective phenomenological for so-called phenomenological models, and for (the values of) the parameters of such models. (Example of use: .) The back-formation of an imagined concept of phenomenology in physics as if it is a thing on its own seems misguided.  --Lambiam 19:23, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Phenomenological model is adequate. IMO, this page should be changed to a redirect, with some relevant text moved there as examples. Evgeny (talk) 21:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is being defined here?
Talk:Path-ordering

message: Would it be appropriate to merge ordered exponential into this page (perhaps as a detailed example)? Akriasas (talk) 18:33, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the ordered exponential is a special case of path ordering, but could it be viewed as an important enough example to warrant a separate page?  I think so.  I feel that ordered exponentials are related to Stone's theorem on one-parameter unitary groups, but they deserve separate pages.   I think a physicist might find the (time-)Ordered exponential more concrete and therefore more appealing than the more general Path ordering concept, but that's just my opinion. --S.Wilson (talk) 12:51, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The ordered exponential article also appears to be more general. This article deals only with bosonic and fermionic permutations; the other article, as currently written, seems to allow for more general commutation relations. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 22:30, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: No, this source (Richard Feynman in Volume I Section 39-3 "compressibility of radiation"; see ) does not support the claim. Not at all. I revert. See User talk:196.224.27.85 for the third warning.
Boris Tsirelson (talk) 19:27, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contribution of 196.224.27.85 

message: "{T} is variable in dimension 4 like that of the black hole, but constant in dimension 3 ." (From Section "Time ordering".) I do not understand this phrase. Do you? Or should it be deleted? Boris Tsirelson (talk) 06:25, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: This phrase was added by the same anonymous user whose later content was removed by you for being unsourced. It can be safely removed - I have done so. --Qucumatz (talk) 16:16, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange phrase
Talk:Permeation

message: Is there any reason why the units are described as being 'American' rather than 'Imperial' or 'European' rather than SI?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ClimberTom (talk • contribs) 16:36, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Units in Simple Approximation

message: I think this article should explain the measurement of permeation rate in mol･m/m2･s･Pa, as used in various ANSI standards.  --Westwind273 (talk) 00:10, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units of Measurement
Talk:Positron–Electron Tandem Ring Accelerator

message: * PETRA III website
* DESY website
 
 
 
:Category:Particle physics facilities
:Category:Gluons
:Category:Buildings and structures in Altona, Hamburg
:Category:Synchrotron radiation facilities
:Category:Particle accelerators
Redactrice at DESY (talk) 12:38, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: —Quondum 15:07, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links

message: Just wondering whether there were any comments of questions for the edits proposed above. If not I'll implement them during the course of next week. Redactrice at DESY (talk) 09:27, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any comments or questions? 

message: The edits proposed above were published on 7 September. They extend the stub, compare and and partially merge the article with the information from the DESY main article. The second paragraph in this stub is replaced by the more informative text about PETRA II and PETRA III in the DESY main article. Redactrice at DESY (talk) 12:38, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit published
Talk:Phurba

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 22:43, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Kīla (Buddhism) →  – Phurba is the most well-known term used for this implement. That is because use of the phurba is primarily restricted to Tibetan Buddhism and maybe Japanese (Shingon), but its Indian Buddhist equivalent, kila, hasn't been natively used for centuries. There is also a dispute as to whether the implement is native to Tibet or not. Those biased toward the "not" tend to use the term kila, although it's not in current usage in Tibetan or other Buddhism. So it's not an WP:NPOV title. (This article also had a fork of Vajrakilaya in it, due to the position of the editor who created this article, which has since been separated out to where it belongs.) Skyerise (talk) 17:26, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 June 2021 

message: ‘ One of the principal methods of working with the and to actualize its essence-quality is to pierce’
Is there a word missing between ‘the’ and ‘and’ in this sentence? 2001:8003:3020:1C00:75F0:C12C:7F0B:920A (talk) 07:22, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing word?
Talk:Namkha

message: "is a form of yarn or thread cross composed ... which employed namkha to capture malevolent spirits and thoughtforms."
Any info about this?
~~Ed~~ 2607:FEA8:4A2:4100:21D2:54F6:19BC:D682 (talk) 07:25, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Namkha as spirit catchers
Talk:Physical Review Letters

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Physical Review Letters A. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.   Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:20, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Physical Review Letters A" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Fort McPherson

message: I met an American Indian who is involved in the casino business who told me he was in Atlanta for talks regarding turning over Ft. McPherson to a Native American group. He claimed there was a precedent in California and the US government found giving up military bases to the Indians was an easy way to settle old Indian land claims. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.145.179.91 (talk • contribs) date
:We'll just have to see if that comes to pass, unless you find a source you can cite, I suppose. - Boss1000 17:11, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article reassessed and graded as stub. --dashiellx (talk) 20:13, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: someone needs to make the first step and take all this long winded and completely unreferenced stuff down.... marked since 2009.--Wuerzele (talk) 00:57, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  unreferenced out of date page of the Fort McPherson Public Affairs Office 
Talk:Open letter

message: Should we have a list of open letters for people to add to, or is against wiki guidelines?
Comperr 03:33, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There should be some useful examples on en.wikisource.org. John Vandenberg 05:03, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Can everybody engaged in this multiple edit war please listen? The last edit with the above 2 letters is OK, but simply way too long. So let the editor who introduced it before, please trim it down to the same lenght as all other open letters. That is all! Good luck! In the meantime I will stop MY edit warring.... Super48paul (talk) 09:48, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iran's supreme leader
Talk:Lotus case

message: Hi-
The list on other nations that have objected to the ICC is clearly off topic on this case; the fact that the US invoked the Lotus principle regarding the ICC just barely so.
130.64.110.168 14:49, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Irrelevant list

message: The Lotus principle as currently described in the article is essentially a rule to say that when a sovereign state is not explicitly prohibited from acting in a certain way by international law, it is allowed to so act, again under international law.  Again, as currently described in the article, the 1958 High Seas Convention gave an explicit rule about which sovereign state could exercise jurisdiction over sailors on the high seas.  To overrule a principle is to make it so it is no longer a rule or no longer applies.  In this case, however, the convention does not overrule the principle itself, it just changes the result of the principle's application with regard to exercising jurisdiction on sailors in the high seas.  IMHO (talk) 18:30, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Lotus principle not overruled by the 1958 High Seas Convetion
Talk:Mattathias

message: it says he is father of the Judah i think it should just be father of Judah—Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.224.105.84 (talk • contribs) 
:Amended already. I've added he was also the father of the others. --Dweller (talk) 13:06, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How do we know for certain that מתתיהו בן יוחנן הכהן is his name?  We know from Septuagint he is Mattathias, son of John, but we can only assume that John means יוחנן, not יהוחנן.
Nachother (talk) 21:51, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hebrew Name 

message: Please see Talk:Eleazar Avaran#Naming conventions on WP for the Maccabees. Discussion: How should the original Maccabees, the father Mattathias and his five sons, John (Johanan), Simon, Judah (Judas), Eleazar (Elazar), Jonathan be known on Wikipedia? Thank you, IZAK (talk) 11:11, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming conventions on WP for the Maccabees 
Talk:Pike High School

message: Can we use the picture they use for Pike High School on their main webpage or no? Gamloverks (talk) 17:02, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: School Picture
Talk:Hilbert basis (linear programming)

message: So I thought my original reference to Integer Linear Programming was more appropriate, because Hilbert bases are so specific to integer programming, but currently there is no article for Integer Linear programming specifically, so this is also fine. Some definitions apparently omit "minimality" in Hilbert basis definition. Vkuncak 03:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aljafería

message: * I have started the translation of this page from the page in Spanish. It really could use some work to make it sound more fluid. --Cybersayer 03:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation

message: Would anyone object if I moved this to Aljafería? "La Aljafería Palace" just sounds ugly; "Aljafería Palace" would be better, but I see no reason to keep the "Palace" when the name doesn't refer to anything else. --Blisco 18:30, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I'll assume silent assent. --Blisco 11:46, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: The "history" section should begin with the building's construction and the context in Zaragoza when it was built.  It currently starts with what happened after those people were defeated and ownership change d hands. Krobin (talk) 19:44, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  11th Century history