Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Psychology/Assessment

message: The new revisions look good! Where possible, I also would suggest placing types of articles in each rating category, e.g., like at Wikipedia:WikiProject Indiana/Assessment, in addition to example articles. Rfrisbietalk 23:12, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Customized importance scale 

message: *Top-importance is for core topics that are so vital that an encyclopedia could not even be considered for printing without it. These tend to be broad, general areas that are critical to any further studies of psychology.
*High-importance articles are foundational topics that would probably be covered in your average undergraduate-level Psychology 101 class, so anyone with a basic knowlege of psychology would have heard about it.
*Mid-importance articles probably would not be covered in an introductory class, but they probably would be covered in other undergraduate classes. It would be considered basic knowledge for most people with an undergraduate degree in psychology but probably not for the average person.
*Low-importance articles deal with issues that probably would only be known to people who have performed detailed studies of a topic and may deal with issues that even most pscyhologists would not know about unless they have chosen to specifically study that topic. I think that this would include topics that would not be covered until one reaches a Master's level education or higher, unless you had a special interest in that topic. These articles are probably too obscure for a printed general-interest encyclopedia, although they might be found in a printed encyclopedia of psychology.
—Cswrye 20:54, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Explanation of how criteria should work

message: I request an assessment of importance of the article Karl Menninger. Karl Menninger was a famous psychologist, writer of The Human Mind  winner of the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Influential in pushing for the legal status of insanity as a reason for exculpability of crimes.Dwarf Kirlston 22:30, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Karl A Menninger

message: How do you go about asking for one of these - or does a 'turn' just come round? I've seen a site where the sole author added there own assessment of importance. Is this right? Fainites barley 23:17, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Like almost everything else in Wikipedia, anyone is free to add or change assessments. You don't need to ask permission for it or anything like that. However, be prepared to defend your rating if it is contested by another editor, and when there is a dispute, consensus will determine what the rating should be. --Cswrye (talk) 19:01, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment of Importance

message: *John Ordronaux (doctor). This is an interesting one that I have been helping a new, but very talented, editor write. My input has been on the technical aspects - linking, refs etc. It is, I think, clearly C class , but we would like to get it up to at least B class. Requesting a review from the Project. Thank you. – ukexpat (talk) 22:35, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[John Ordronaux (doctor)]] - Assessment request 

message: Can you please assess our Mechanical Aptitude page?
Coxdc (talk) 20:07, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment request 

message: I am making a page for work motivation for this class and I would like this to be reviewed so I can see what I need to work on. Jastha08 (talk) 20:13, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment request for Work motivation

message: I have been editing job analysis for this class and would greatly appreciate if someone could review it. Thank you! Mnshumate (talk) 19:06, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment request

message: My group has been editing Organizational commitment for this class. We were wondering if anyone could review it for us. Any help will be appreciated.
thank you! Mac ro370 (talk) 16:51, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment request

message: Hi! Our Wikipedia team has made edits to the Big Five personality traits article. This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. But rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale. I hope anyone could review this article and see if it is eligible for higher class article or not. Saehee0908 (talk) 22:12, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment request

message: If this is where we put our requests for WP:Psychology articles to be assessed, then I was wondering if anybody can assess Lyn Yvonne Abramson, please.  The only thing I did on my part was to clean up any potential link rot.  I'm not a member of WP:Psychology, and I don't think I would make a great member of that WP.  It's just that this article is unassessed by that WP.  Thank you in advance. --Buspirtraz (talk) 06:11, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Lyn Yvonne Abramson]] - Assessment Request 

message: The Assessment Taskforce link on the Portal page redirects here, and yet there is no information for people who would like to have articles submitted for assessment/reassessment.  I just expanded the disconfirmed expectancy page and would like to remove the "stub" class assessment, but there is seemingly no information on this portal on the proper protocol for this. Thanks, Adam Blake (talk) 05:45, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to request assessment 

message: Hi. Could you please reassess Talk:Psychological trauma; looking at :Category:High-importance psychology articles, it seems to belong there as, e.g., Anxiety. Thanks. Fgnievinski (talk) 19:25, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Trauma (psychology)]] -- Mid-importance? 

message: Hey guys, We've been working on this article. It's been submitted for grading already, but I wanna put it into the mainspace later. I'd love to hear someone else's impression of the article quality beforehand. I'd also love contributions, espcially re: secondary sources, which I've had some trouble finding any. Thanks in advance! --Hawks  09:24, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Request [[Wikipedia:WikiProject|WikiProject]] assessment 

message: Currently rated Stub class. Requesting reassessment. Biochemistry&Love (talk) 08:52, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment Request for [[Psychiatric pharmacy]]

message: Hello everyone, I expanded an article (Immigrant paradox) that was formerly rated Stub class. It is no longer rated as such but now has no rating. Would anyone mind taking a look at it? Thank you! Rsr788 (talk) 16:49, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment Request

message: Transcluded from :Template:Grading scheme documentation. --Xurizuri (talk) 01:49, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here's a list of grading scheme templates