Talk:Gender in English

message: Under Modern English it has this note: parentheses "()" — unusual usage. But in the table, "they" is in parentheses—even though it's very common. I suggest changing "unusual" to "unusual/nonstandard", but I wanted to see what other people had to say about it.
68.127.11.20 (talk) 00:45, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unusual? 

message: A section about irregular (though sometimes widespread) usage like "This man really loves his boat/car, he cleans HER every day" would be a nice idea. 89.231.114.97 (talk) 22:44, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You clearly have misunderstood the meaning of a metaphor.-- Île flottɑnte~Floɑting islɑnd  Talk  00:06, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metaphors 

message: There are a number of pedants (on TV Tropes, for instance) who insist that French-derived words should maintain their gendered forms in English. For stuff like masseuse vs masseur or fiancé vs fiancée, this is not really grammatical gender and is equivalent to actor vs actress, but I've also heard that men are blond whereas woman are blonde, which is a matter of grammatical gender. Wikipidia's article on blond supports this, though it does endorse using "brunette" for men with brown hair in that article. Should we address this as well? Ace of Sevens (talk) 00:53, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: fiancé(e) may be another example --Rumping (talk) 23:45, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  French-derived words 

message: Is A/An gender?
A box.
An ice.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cool Å2 (talk • contribs) 00:23, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that has nothing to do with gender at all. It's purely dependent on whether the following word starts with a consonant or a vowel. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 14:30, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

text: It's a relic of sandhi. —Tamfang (talk) 10:57, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  A/An 

message: The existence of "gender specific words" clearly shows that gender is alive and well in English. Referring to a woman as a "waiter" is extremely awkward. Moreover, it is ungrammatical to refer to a waitress in one sentence, and then in the next clause use that as an antecedent for the pronoun "he".
:Upon entering the restaurant, I was greeted by a waitress. {He*/She} greeted me cheerfully and showed me to my table.*
This whole article is NPOV.  Gender in proper nouns like Jennifer, and words like waitress, and pronouns like she, isn't going anywhere. 192.139.122.42 (talk) 23:03, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not full-fledged gender just to have words referring to male and female beings. Full-fledged gender is, among other things, referring to things that are neither male nor female using pronouns usually used for things that are male or female. Latin is an example, where the moon is "she" and the sun is "he", and if you switched it around, it would be ambiguous what you were referring to. English isn't like that. — Eru·tuon 02:53, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: the article says ' With the exceptions of the traditional, optional uses of *** and *** pronouns for ships (and analogous machinery) and for nation states (e.g. "Britain and *** allies"), all other gender-related grammatical differences have vanished.', what about mother tounge? its kinda simulair, and is it worth noting?Z11o22 (talk) 12:52, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That's semantic gender (used as a metaphor) rather than grammatical gender. There is some sense in which your native language can be described as the "language of your mother". This is not the case for the other examples. --EminentCluster (talk) 03:35, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No gender in modern English: bollocks! 

message: In English, cats are given a feminine grammatical gender, dogs are masculine and ships are feminine, regardless of their actual physical gender. I wonder if this is documented somewhere? Kortoso (talk) 18:24, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Both cat and dog (hund) are masculine in Anglo-Saxon. Kortoso (talk) 18:42, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

text: Where do you live that all dogs are considered male and all cats are considered female? In my part of the U.S., most people refer to cats as "he" until they learn the correct gender, then they switch if necessary.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.120.205.101 (talk) 00:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cats, dogs and ships 

message: The gender of the person they are named after has nothing to do with it.
http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2014/feb/01/ask-grown-up-boats-called-she
: "Many Indo-European languages have "male", "female" and sometimes "neuter" words. English instead has evolved into using neuter words such as "the". So it could be that making ships female and calling them "she" is an example of a really ancient, English-speaking practice of giving a gender to an inanimate object."
Kortoso (talk) 22:01, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ships 

message: There is no singular "they" in the English language, as the article suggests. This is an article about grammar, not about politics; it should therefore adhere to objective and correct English grammar not to a certain ideology, which would be POV.
154.123.101.242 (talk) 20:05, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singular They 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gender in English. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5kwpdH4jo?url=http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761564210_2/English_Language.html to http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761564210_2/English_Language.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:46, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: "Increasingly, the "male" form of such nouns is used for both men and women."
Or... English author, poet, actor... are unmarked, like teacher, friend, cousin, i.e. they're genderless, thus free at least in formal terms for both m. and f. (whereas in a language with grammatical gender like Catalan, 'my friend/cousin Marta' forces amiga/cosina, outlaws amic/cosí). Granted, not as simple as just these examples might seem to imply (e.g. the marked forms are fading at different velocities: authoress and poetess by now archaic, actress losing ground only recently, waitress fairly robust), but still, introduction of the concept of marking very early on in this article would inform readers of a basic principle, and enable smoother and more straightforward exposition further on. Barefoot through the chollas (talk) 16:21, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marked (actress) / unmarked (actor) would be useful here 

message: When was the last time a non-neutral pronoun for an inanimate object other than a ship (or machine or country) was used in literature? At least as late as 1557 it was used in the introductory poem of https://archive.org/details/TheWhetstoneOfWitte, referring to a stone. ◄ Sebastian 14:28, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last use of gender for inanimate objects in literature? 

message: "Most transgender people use the standard pronouns (he, she, etc.) that match their gender identity".  This statement makes no sense, because (1) everyone (transgender or otherwise) uses all the pronouns.  For example, I use the pronoun "I" when talking about myself, "he" when talking about Donald Trump, "she" when talking about Hillary Clinton, and so on.  And transgender people do the same thing. (2) It is rare to talk about oneself in the third person. So, this statement "most transgender people use" such-and-such pronouns is actually an incorrect way of stating "most transgender people request/expect others to use the standard pronouns (he, she, etc) that match their gender identity".  I'll edit the article accordingly.  Please, don't misuse the word "use".  86.170.115.181 (talk) 20:54, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi , thank you for your message. I do think that 'use' is pretty fine, as people have to use their name and gender pronoun more often than you might think. Filling out forms for example. By your formulation, you would exclude this kind of action, while transgender people do use their new gender pronoun for filling out forms etc. Furthermore, the actions 'requesting' or 'expecting' are weaker than the action 'use', as it is not indicated by the reference that generally transgender people assertively request or expect others to use their preferred pronoun. This is my humble opinion, so if you get consensus for your point, I won't be bothered by any change. Cheers, Pyrite Pro (talk) 18:50, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Misleading statement

message: The article suggests that contact with old Norse sped along the decline of gender in English. But old Norse had gender (of a very similar kind to old English), so why would contact with it cause English to lose its gender distinctions? Furius (talk) 17:52, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contact with old Norse 

message: Maybe define what this means?  It is not clear in the context.  I assumed it meant that English was in the process of reducing the number of infections, but that is not clear from the gist of the previous paragraph, and furthermore it seems to be contradicted by the following sentences relating to subsequent influence by languages with genders. Laikalegrand (talk) 22:36, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  inflectional reduction?