lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Iron Jacket

message: question about armour
Was he wearing chain mail or plate armour breastplate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.201.92.74 (talk) 13:10, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An editor has inexplicably reverted a set of cleanup edits. He claims that this edit is justified to preserve a category. Leaving aside the issue of his failure to preserve other improvements, the category in question specifies a scope that does not include biographies. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:19, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverts 

message: This page says his name in Comanche is spelled Puhihwitsikwasʉ, while on the Comanche article, it spells it as Puhihwikwasu'u [Puhihwikwasuʔu]. My understanding is that "ʉ" and "u" are not the same in Comanche, so which one is more correct? Aquabluetesla (talk) 17:46, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: ...Puhihwikwasu'u is correct.  puhihwi 'metal' + kwasu'u 'article of clothing ('dress' on women, 'shirt' on men)'.  --TaivoLinguist (Taivo) (talk) 12:10, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name in [[Comanche language|Comanche]]?
Talk:Washington Square (film)

message: I removed the entire section comparing the film to the original novel because it read like a term paper and as such contained a considerable amount of POV. The references cited within this section were themselves POVs expressed by other writers and didn't seem suitable for an encyclopedia article.
I also replaced the reviews from websites with some written by critics from mainstream newspapers, and added some data re: the film's production. MovieMadness (talk) 15:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: My edits
Talk:St. Joseph High School (St. Joseph, Michigan)

message: The article was pretty bad - tried to re-format and add info.  
I haven't been able to track down a lot of the history of the school and general info.  Some of things I think should be added are:
* Sports info – What years and sports was the school state champions in? (or regional, division, etc)
* Band info – same thing
* Is there anything currently notable about the school?
* How many students attend?
* What year was it built? 
* How many Sq feet is the building, and how big is the property?
* Info on major changes (like the new stadium) – when was it built, how much, who financed, etc.
* Have there been any notable grads since it was built? Major musicians, politicians, actors, sports stars, religious, people involved in major scandals, etc.
* Any other history of note (school or people that went there )
* Accreditation and other educational info.
Anyone have a resource for this stuff? Would prefer something that can be verified (and linked to).
While I left the Sports and Clubs in from the original, I would think only the highlights should be shown (e.g., Sports Achievements).  
Ward99 (talk) 17:09, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-write

message: I removed three state championship claims from the athletic section today and referenced it.  The two earliest basketball championships claimed (1920 & 1921)  predate the MHSAA record book and the claim of a state championship for boys cross country in 1979 was false.  The CC state champs in all divisions for 1979 were: Ann Arbor Greenhills, St. Louis, Jackson Lumen Christi, and Grand Blanc. Gtwfan52 (talk) 20:38, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  False and or undocumentable info in athletics section 

message: Looks like they got a new principal a year ago.  Was updated, but reverted because lack of ref.  I added one.  Here's another:
Gregrata (talk) 02:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Principal
Talk:Dusk (TV channel)

message: There's no talk page here? Anyway, this article seems to have had several names - I recently completed a hist merge between SCREAM and SCREAM (TV channel), ending at this location because this is the current location of the content - any opinions on what the title should be? —Random832 16:13, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

message: Is it possible to merge this article with ABC Spark, since Dusk is now ABC Spark?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:8FE0:2240:1906:54C1:37A:6114 (talk) 19:31, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Contamination control

message: Having external links (other than as references) is a pretty low priority at Wikipedia, since (non-reference) links don't really have anything to do with having a quality encyclopedia. Wikipedia is also not a Google replacement, so the idea that external links should be there for the users is not relevant. An external link, ideally, is only included when it offers something that could never be in the encyclopedia itself. See also: Corporate vanity policy enforcement.--Paleorthid (talk) 16:21, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: Citation and rewrite is needed for the open-ended wording that the "majority of products being recalled in certain industries are due to an ineffective contamination control system." The "certain industries" need to be specified (again with proper sourcing). I suspect the certain industries is electronics, and not the wider range of products that many would assume dominate the set of "products being recalled".  This assumed wider range would extend to the food supply, a highly visible sector with contamination challenges. The field contamination of food (and resulting recalls) is not controlled by the contamination control systems currently described by the article. Current article wording allows the casual reader to assume that they would be controlled. --Paleorthid (talk) 17:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  recalls due to contamination 

message: There is currently no article on Contamination; Contamination is currently a Redirect to Pollution.  However, there is this Contamination control article, and articles on Radioactive contamination and Human decontamination.  Decontamination redirects to Human decontamination, although non-human decontamination is also a worthwhile subject to mention somewhere in Wikipedia.  Pollution control and Pollutant used to be their own separate article stubs of an article until they were merged into Pollution, whereupon Pollution control and Pollutant were turned into Redirects to Pollution.  Contaminant redirects to Pollution.  There are a couple of articles with the word "Contamination" in their name, but these stand for for titles of works of "art".  Is anybody working on an article called Contamination ?  H Padleckas (talk) 16:08, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current status 
Talk:Tuda Murphy

message: Per the news, he capped for Jamaica, Dominican Republic (2002?) and Puerto Rico. Except Dominican Republic was supported by RSSSF and per RSSSF he also played for Cuba and Martinique, seems he is not too old for Puerto Rico, which the last met was in 1993.
Also, the new said he played for George Town SC, but national-football-teams.com had difference story. Matthew_hk tc 16:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Caps and clubs
Talk:Cooper Canada

message: I'm wondering if this is worth selling 79.69.162.108 (talk) 14:23, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canada Cooper bat for sale, little League Johnny bench 25l
Talk:Kelly Writers House

message: I think KWH passes notability criteria (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)) but the page has room for improvement. Many of the sources are directly from the KWH's website, few are secondary independent sources. Further, I worry about the significance of many of the highlighted publications. I doubt that all university publications ran from the KWH are of import. Further, some of the included photos lack adequate descriptions and I worry about their copyright. --Distancesarewhite (talk) 14:12, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving the article
Talk:Seyfarth Shaw

message: When you look at the List of 100 largest law firms globally, this firm is the only one without links or a description.  Why not have a stub and a link to the website?  It's more useful than having nothing.  You just deleted it too quickly for me to put in any details.  
NeilKT (talk) 16:43, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, being in the top 100 implies, but does not guarantee, notability.  I have removed the speedy tag and encourage you to expand it.  This does mean that the article cannot have further debate about it appropriateness on Wikipedia through an article for deletion debate.  Jon513 (talk) 18:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you confirm the citation has been done properly?  Not keen to add more content if the citations become too onerous.NeilKT (talk) 19:07, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is currently formated fine but it needs to be expanded.  You should read Wikipedia:Footnotes to learn how to make footnotes on wikipedia.  It is more important to do you best then to worry that you got everything right.  Someone can always come along after you and correct any mistakes you make.  Also these results at google news for "Seyfarth Shaw" might be helpful in expanding the article.  Jon513 (talk) 19:23, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:SS Samuel Huntington

message: The following text was unsourced and removed from the article:
If anyone has the source information for this, it would be nice to have some of the details added back to the article. — Bellhalla (talk) 00:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed text 

message: As far as I can determine, there are no photos—public domain or fair use—of SS Samuel Huntington available. — Bellhalla (talk) 11:01, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 
Talk:West Kelowna

message: Just in case this might become controversial, I'll open a thread here. My understanding from WP:CANSTYLE is that Canadian place names which have no "competition" as an article name should be titled with the simple name. Since I'm not aware of any other "West Kelowna" which needs an article, I think the simple form is best for this article.
Competitive article moving is definitely not the way to go, so let's discuss it here first and if necessary go to WP:RM. Franamax (talk) 02:16, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: I took the liberty of changing the name of Lakeview Heights, British Columbia to  Lakeview Heights, West Kelowna as per WP:CANSTYLE I kept Westbank the way it is because area is with history shouldn't be changed. RebaFan1996 (talk) 20:30, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  neighbourhoods 
Talk:Yang

message: I just removed the link to Yang (potatoes and corn) (plant): a plant indigenous to Thailand because it is the manual of style for disambiguation pages policy not to make a red link unless another article already links to the non-existing article.  see Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(disambiguation_pages)#Red_links. Pdbailey (talk) 16:48, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: plant

message: Shouldn’t this be included? Eternal Shadow Talk 21:02, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andrew Yang?
Talk:Flux qubit

message: Is the minimum flux quanta Phi_zero when there is a single cooper pair traveling around the qubit?
 It seems not: http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/8483 says there are more than 10^7 electrons moving collectively.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.250.252.133 (talk) 15:14, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions

message: Such a link was missing, so I added it on the first line. Tal Mor (talk) 10:07, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  I added a link to superconducting quantum computing 
Talk:Deputy prime minister

message: I'm not a native speaker of English. But I feel that the title should be moved to Vice Prime minister. I think vice refers to a post in the cabinet and deputy refers to person who acts as the prime minister in the absence of the latter. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 19:36, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deputy or vice 

message: I wanted to add that Gantz and Sa'ar are now deputy prime ministers in Israel but the code is too complicated for me. Can anyone help? Shacharrz (talk) 07:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Israel
Talk:Designer

message: , trying to give a balanced and objective definition and explanation of what a designer is and does. There is quite a long list of 'examples', and I guess it could be expanded further - but would that really be helpful? I think it is not helpful to have a few examples presented in detail (Costume and Game, as we have now).  We cannot have all the examples presented in that way. That should be left to the main articles about the professions. The 'See also' and 'Categories' are also not helpful as they are.
Bristolian46 (talk) 17:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Neutral: It's probably a good idea to delete them or at least shorten them and include equally short examples of all the other designers listed. The only reason I can think of to keep them is because the article lacks content without them. It's pretty much a stub without the examples. Maybe a whole new structure is needed with common subtopics like history, modern uses, controversy , etc. Oicumayberight (talk) 18:50, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Getting a balance

message: This article as it stands hardly justifies being in Wikipedia at all. It is primarily a simple, uninformative essay, with basic errors in spelling and grammar, just one inappropriate citation, and a long list. Nigel Cross (talk) 09:38, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple issues
Talk:Consular tribune

message: This article relies heavily on the a single work (Forsyth's) which is idiosyncratic in several viewpoints. It could use other sources, e.g., Cornell, Lintott. - Eponymous-Archon (talk) 02:57, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more refs Suggestion 

message: I reverted some edits from an IP. This was for the following reasons.
* The paragraph with the incipit "Modern scholars" interjected into the Traditional account section is both duplication of the same paragraph I wrote later in Re-evaluation but also was done so without citing sources.
* Some paragraphs were written which were wholly unsourced while overwriting sourced material. The new version also was wrong: there were never two consular tribunes elected.
I also added some stuff from Lomas' 2018 book, which provides a decent handling of the topic from a modern perspective. Ifly6 (talk) 15:47, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re recent reverts
Talk:Kenza Farah

message: I propose the the album articles (Authentik,Authentik Mixtape, Avec le coeur, Trésor) be merged into this article on the grounds on WP:NALBUM as no claims of charting have been made for these articles, nor have there been any sourcing attempts.  I would not be opposed to a Split of the content to a seperate discography article. Pending objections I intend to make this merge in 7 days. Hasteur (talk) 16:58, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I rather suggest keeping them on this page, and transforming them into collapsible lists. Cheers. -Dzlinker \,,/(*_*)\,,/ 12:25, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging/Spliting Albums
Talk:Herbie, the Love Bug (TV series)

message: This article is called "Herbie the Matchmaker." The show's title card reads "Herbie the Love Bug." The first episode is called "Herbie the Matchmaker," but I think "Herbie the Love Bug" is the name of the show.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.168.138.147 (talk) 09:12, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Matchmaker" or "Love Bug"? 

message: It says in the article that there are 5 or 6 episodes.  Which is it?  First it says that it was a 5-episode replacement series then that there were 6 episodes broadcast.  Wouldn't that make it a "6-episode" replacement series?  HaarFager (talk) 02:02, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It was five, as multiple sources say (see ).  I'll correct the text. Vmanjr (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just How Many Episodes Were There? 

message: While I agree that adding "(TV series)" is a good idea for disambiguation, I disagree that the comma is superfluous.  The official title of the series, as used by Walt Disney Productions, is Herbie, the Love Bug (with the comma), and per Wikipedia's MOS, we should include any punctuation included in the actual title of the work for the article name.  This comma-inclusive is corroborated by all of Disney's promotional material for the series (for example, the promotional images on IMDb ).  Without starting a move war, I'd like to propose moving the title to "Herbie, the Love Bug (TV series)".  Thoughts/objections? Vmanjr (talk) 18:37, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Didn't make sense to litter the edit description.  Proof of the comma being used in official Walt Disney Productions correspondence and in reference documents:               There is not a single reference to the show being called "All-New Adventures of Herbie the Love Bug", aside from that promotional ad (which I argue is a misinterpretation of what part of that is a title and what part is an advertising slogan).  I don't see how Star Wars plays into this - I'm not using the title card in the show itself as a reference. Vmanjr (talk) 05:41, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title
Talk:The Song of the Vermonters, 1779

message: Who is the performer of this recording on youtube? This version has minor differences and is called 'Ballad of the Green Mountain Boys'. DancesWithGrues (talk) 02:41, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: maybe we should make a Seperate Article for that song? Kingllama100 (talk) 14:24, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Principate

message: In the last paragraph of the section on the Dominate: "The political role of the Senate went into final eclipse, no more being heard of the division by the Augustan Principate of the provinces between imperial provinces and senatorial provinces."
I find this sentence really ungrammatical, and I don't think it is clear what is exactly meant by it. Please if someone knows what it means, formulate it in a way that doesn't confuse the reader. Or if I'm just being dumb, please explain its meaning. OberleutnantMarton (talk) 13:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume what is meant is: "The political role of the Senate was finally extinguished. Provinces were no longer designated "imperial" or "senatorial" as they were during Augustus's Principate." Two problems with saying that at this point in the article: (1) the article hasn't explained the distinction earlier (see Roman province#Early imperial period). It comes out of the blue as if readers know all about it. (2) I think that distinction had disappeared long before the Dominate. DeCausa (talk) 18:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Convoluted sentence
Talk:Montachusett Regional Transit Authority

message: ...why the Montachusett Regional Transit Authority's URL is https://www.mrta.us/ and that calls it "MART", but not the Montachusett Authority Regional Transit? InedibleHulk (talk) 10:15, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't find anything useful in a newspaper search. My off-the-cuff guess is that "MRTA" was too similar to "MBTA" for branding purposes. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:42, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for trying. Could also be distancing itself from "MRSA", now that you mention it. "MART" definitely feels quicker, fresher and super. InedibleHulk (talk) 09:16, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone explain...
Talk:Brandeis/Roberts station

message: Former Name
Was the Brendeis/Roberts station know as Roberts' Crossing before it was called Roberts? For example, this 1875 map https://www.wardmaps.com/viewasset.php?aid=555 marks the station with the label Roberts Crossing Depot.
Origin of Roberts
The article states that the station was named after the neighborhood of Waltham, Roberts, without any evidence. It's just as likely that the station was named first, and the neighborhood got it's name from the station.
Johnsilverarizona (talk) 00:32, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Abritus

message: The text at "...under Constantine the Great, seemingly for immigrant "barbarians"..." is confusing. Surely the wall was provided for protection from the barbarians, not to benefit them. RMcPhillip (talk) 02:08, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The wall benefitted who?
Talk:Conjectura poutama

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 ISBN 0-00-216906-1. It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:51, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Conjectura carinata

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 ISBN 0-00-216906-1. It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:38, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Conjectura atypica

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 ISBN 0-00-216906-1. It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:39, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed