Talk:WDAZ-TV

message: To all editors, please see the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Newscast_schedules.2C_redux, where the issue of removing locally originated programming schedules is discussed. Calwatch 05:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of newscast schedules?

message: Was there a relationship between WDAZ going on the air in 1967 and the introduction of cable to Winnipeg in 1967? Did WDAZ essentially rely on Winnipeg advertisers in earlier years? --PsychoJason 09:12, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The signal from Fordville only reaches so far into Manitoba.  CITI, Was--Spiddy 00:08, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1967: Winnipeg cable connection 

message: Should I add information on the "Emo" story, since it gave WDAZ national exposure via YouTube and eBaumsWorld.
Is it appropriate to talk about their national exposure on the Internet on Wikipedia? 71.209.107.26 15:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll add something about it.--milk the cows (Talk) 15:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you think mentioning the emo report is really warranted or necessary? --MatthewUND(talk) 20:30, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

text: It was aired on CNN Headline News just an hour ago, and replayed on Seattle radio last night. The DJ called it the "Stupidest thing he'd ever heard". So, it's getting national attention.--milk the cows (Talk) 23:01, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's even been on Headline News now? That's crazy! Was it just on the regular news updates or was it on a program (like Glen Beck)? --MatthewUND(talk) 05:46, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

text: It showed the video clip during regular news during this afternoon. It was labeled as "the next threat to North Dakota".--milk the cows (Talk) 07:19, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[Emo (slang)|Emo]]" report 

message: :Image:WDAZ.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:46, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:WDAZ.jpg

message: I know some TV listings have WDAZ-DT2 as a CW affiliate, but it is incorrect. I have a digital TV and there isn't a 8-2 (just a 8-1), though WDAY-TV has The CW on digital (6-2). I contacted the station, and they also say it is incorrect.--milk the cows (Talk) 21:12, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WDAZ-TV|WDAZ-DT2]] [[The CW Television Network|CW]] 

message: I'm sorry, but this employee list is getting way out of control. I can see including a list of anchors and perhaps even reporters, but secretaries and production crew? Too much information...I'm editing the list. --MatthewUND(talk) 20:59, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Employee list