lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Carthusian horse

message: A number of things about the existing article concern me.  The first is that there is a lot of word-for-word content taken from the existing sources.  Next, the "warts under the tail" are probably melanomas, common in gray horses generally!  Third is that, like the so-called "Egyptian Arabian," if this isn't really a separate breed, it shouldn't have its own article, it should be merged with Andalusian.  I get a little nervous about articles attributing   I am also amused that, if the sources there are correct, we have drop dead PROOF that the Andalusian has Arabian blood, which the breed purists hotly deny.    The frontal "bosses" thing pops up in several breed articles besides this one, and may need to have some digging done to further figure out that one...I'd tag for merge, because this is a bloodline group, not a breed. Montanabw(talk) 18:39, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd agree,all my books say it is a strain or bloodline within the PRE (Andalusian).Arsdelicata (talk) 05:12, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you take "all my (your) books" and peek at Andalusian horse?  We are trying to crank it up to GA quality, but the breed politics are screaming weird and the "pure horse" obsession of some of the hardcore aficionados is such that we want to be very careful that we have verifiable sources... you are the closest to the Spanish breed stuff and I think your input would be valuable.  Dana has been leading the GA push and working very hard...   Montanabw(talk) 02:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've performed the merge, and I'll drop a few more comments regarding it on the Andalusian talk page. Dana boomer (talk) 14:46, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article improvement
Talk:New York State Route 341

message: Note that this covers all highways in New York that have been numbered 341.
;Earliest known alignment; coverage to be in NY 55
*by 1933: went from N of Wingdale @ NY 22 to CT line (became CT 55) (1933 NE RMcN)
*by 1935: supplanted by an extended NY 55 (1935 RMcN)
;Next alignment; coverage to be in this article
*1930: NY 55 continued due east from NY 22 in Pawling to the CT line by way of modern CR 67; doesn't appear to have connected to any route on the CT side (1930 GD)
*1932 and 1933 RMcNs don't show the extension of 55 eastward but also leave the Wingdale highway unmarked
*by 1935: NY 55 realigned to follow NY 22 north to Wingdale; former routing of NY 55 east of Pawling designated NY 341 (1935 RMcN)
*removed sometime around the early 1940s
**last map to mark it is a 1940 Gousha; GD never marked the route and the 1940 RMcN omits it as well – TMF 18:56, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: History notes
Talk:The Letting Go

message: eh, i'm not sure what i did, but i think i messed something up - the tracklisting and the external links are now missing, and I can't figure out why.
Furste 01:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Apodicticity

message: I think that's a great idea merge away.
LoveMonkey 01:48, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Although, it might be sensible to rename to apodictic... Anarchia (talk) 05:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from apodeictic

message: What does "The True and the Evident" mean in reference to Franz Brentano? Is that a title? Bestowed by whom? -Ac44ck (talk) 18:00, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is the title of a work written by him. - Ac44ck (talk) 00:46, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Franz Brentano
Talk:Anna Seward Pruitt

message: I just completed the requested page move, and merged the history from Anna S. Pruitt to this location. -GTBacchus(talk) 19:45, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alastair Hannay

message: I wrote the stub for this. Will work on rest of article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grammatophile (talk • contribs) 14:22, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs review of Hannay's own work 

message: The second sentence does not appear to make a grammatical sentence. It could do with a comma in place of a full stop, but this would make the sentence too long. I guess that what I am saying is that this whole article could do with a re-write. Vorbee (talk) 18:05, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs a re-write to be grammatical
Talk:Henry Sidgwick

message: Please fix the problem with the reference no. I. The source is: Rawls, J. 1980. 'Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory'. In: Journal of Philosophy 77 (1980).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.89.85.75 (talk) 04:05, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: "Bart Schultz's 2005 biography of Sidgwick sought to establish that Sidgwick was a lifelong homosexual, though it is unknown whether he ever expressed his inclinations in intercourse. According to Schultz, Sidgwick struggled internally throughout his life with issues of hypocrisy and openness in connection with his own forbidden desires." Since Sidgwick expressed no outward characteristics of inversion, either through speech, writing, or behavior, and there were no witnesses in Sidgwick's dormer, I assume that Bart Schultz possesses the enviable ability to read minds. He has succeeded in reading the innermost thoughts of a man who has been deceased for quite a while. That is truly a noteworthy accomplishment.Lestrade (talk) 00:31, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: As Usual

message: Is that part really that relevant to deserve nearly half the article? --88.78.62.70 (talk) 16:52, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with this six year old comment even today. I would like to suggest a solution: Sidgwick's interest in parapsychology ought to be covered, because he saw it as deeply connected to his work in philosophy for which he is most notable. It should be possible to create a well-sourced section on his interest in parapsychology, and why it is relevant to the rest of his work, that incorporates the information from this section as it exists in abridged form - Keegan.Landrigan (talk) 07:44, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: hi , agree that, as it stands, the article does look unbalanced, noting that this section was added by  in a number of edits in November 2013 (see here), unfortunately they appear to have retired from WP so cant be asked about this, also, that all the information is included in the Eusapia Palladino article. suggest being bold and go for it, reducing this information to a couple of sentences, with additional words on Sidgwick's overall interest in parapsychology. Cheers. Coolabahapple (talk) 20:47, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eusapia Palladino
Talk:Dosidon

message: The name is Dosaidon. Sai means rhino.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.236.150.27 (talk) 19:49, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That may be true, but aren't the Japanese names for Rhyhorn and Rhydon Sihorn and Sidon?  So wouldn't Rhydon's evolved form keep the tradition with the "Si"?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.163.190.31 (talk) 20:29, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: NO, IT's SAIHORN AND SAIDON! Please change it back!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.242.175.18 (talk) 22:52, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Serebii.net is behind in some trivial aspects; they never bother to update with official Romanizations and more often than not simply use romaji.  The katakana are "dosaidon", yes, but the Romanization is Dosidon.  Which is presumptuously pronounced identically...—ウルタプ 00:51, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: dosidons english name has NOT been confirmed as rhyperior, so i have deleted its 'english' name from the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chaosemeraldking (talk • contribs) 20:46, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  Most people would leave it in there on Serebii's say-so. -Jeske (v^_^v) 21:15, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I couldn't care less if it's kept as Dosidon or changed to Rhyperior. It's true Serebii isn't a reliable source, but in the last couple months, when have they been wrong? :P --NukeMTV 18:59, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  english name 

message: The games will be out April 22nd, and no other name has been confirmed. The name IS Rhyperior and needs to changed.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wolf Link 555 (talk • contribs) 17:20, 5 April 2007  (UTC)
:Let's see, breaking this up:"The games will be out ..." -- They're still not out yet, though. Maybe let's wait till then for some confirmation - it's not that long."No other name has been confirmed" -- Why would another name be reported? Is there any reason the names should be assumed to be confirmed at all before Diamond and Pearl's release?"The name IS Rhyperior ..." -- No, this is the problem - you have no reliable source to back this up. And no, Serebii does not count because his information is attributed to an anonymous source. – mcy1008 (talk) 20:54, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since when did the date confirm anything other than the date? You have to actually have a source (the game would count, though Rhyperior isn't exactly a Pokémon you get near the beginning of the game...) – mcy1008 (talk) 01:15, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name has been confirmed as Rhyperior
Talk:Phenol red

message: I removed the structure picture :Image:Phenol_Red.gif since it is incorrect. The correct structure can be found here. AxelBoldt 19:49, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've drawn a new structure here: . In good faith, I asked that the commons file which the original was linked to be replaced with my version. Your structure seems like there is a keto-enol tautomerization of sorts. Is the NIH version more accurate? I googled the structure and most of the hits were like the one listed here: http://www.usca.edu/chemistry/spectra/phenlred.htm. --Rifleman 82 20:22, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It exists in two structures, depending on pH. Here are the two structures:  . Regarding your picture: I don't think it's needed anymore, since commons has this: :image:Phenolrot.png. We need a picture of the structure under acidic conditions though, when the cycle closes. AxelBoldt 23:56, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Sorry, my fault, I should have cleaned my cache first. The picture is fine now. AxelBoldt 00:26, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I purchased the sodium salt from sigma- from the chemical formula it is the mono-anionic form. Although the crystals and a concentrated stock solution appear red, at 10 uM in water it is yellow, with a broad peak at 432 nm. Adding excess NaOH it turns red, with a sharp peak at 559. This must be di-anionic- presumably deprotonating the phenol OH. In ~24 mM HCl  the peak is 504 nm.  So the yellow-red transition is from the anionic to dianionic form, which I believe is consistent with what is in the page's text now.Eaberry (talk) 06:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

message: The text gives the pKa as 8.00 in one place, and 7.7 in another. Sigma-Aldrich reports 7.92. I suspect the largest value is the thermodynamic pKa extrapolated to infinite dilution, and the other two are at more reasonable ionic strengths. Because the dianionic red form is stabilized by high ionic strength more than the mono-anionic yellow form, ioonic strength will favor dissociation, making it a stronger acid. Does anyone have a reference to the determination of the pKa, preferably with ionic strength dependence?
I purchased the sodium salt from sigma. When dissolved at 10 uM in the standard pH 7.02 phosphate buffer used for calibrating pH electrodes, the molar ratio of the dibasic 559 cpd to monobasic 432 nm compound was 0.187, consistent with a pKa of 7.75 at this ionic strength (which I suspect is rather high). Eaberry (talk) 05:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the pKa?
Talk:Subtitle (titling)

message: I like the Shakespeare addition, but what does "spoofed the vogue" mean?
*(Hello there, I just put in a sentence with a link to List of books with the subtitle "Virtue Rewarded".) It means that subtitles for plays were fashionable in Elisabethan times, and Shakespeare parodied this fashion by giving Twelfth Night a meaningless subtitle. He makes it sound like he wants to put in a subtitle for fashionableness but can't think of one: "It's called Twelfth Night, and then the subtitle is... uh... OK, the subtitle is whatever you want it to be (=what you will)". I'll expand it a bit, let me know if you think it gets any clearer. Well, I will if the page ever reloads, maybe I'll just give up. --Bishonen 18:16, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chevrolet Camaro/Archive 2

message: With the official announcement of the Camaro going into production again for the 2009 model year, there's not a lot of info in the article that is outdated. An example would be comments like "with the Camaro's demise in 2002". These kinds of things are no longer valid. I have already started cleaning up everything, but it's something we should all keep in mind when editing going forward. Roguegeek 20:12, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2009 Camaro 

message: We are in serious need of factual information about what specifically was delivered with the 35th Anniversary Edition option and on which cars it was available.  The article originally stated that it was only for the SS, but my '02 Z28 has the 35th AE package, including the dash plaque and stripe kit (not installed; still in GM packaging and set safely aside.)  I have also seen the base (V6) model with the 35h AE option as well.
Can someone please provide legitimate sources that tell what exactly the package consisted of?  Option code?  Stuff like that is needed.  I'm more than happy to do the writing if someone else will do the research or at least point me in the right direction.  --BRossow 18:21, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  35th Anniversary Edition 

message: I think it would be terrific if someone took it upon himself/herself to add the various generations in infobox format to this page.  Here's the template: Template:Infobox Automobile generation.  If no one else steps up first, I'll do it when I get around to it unless there's a strong consensus objection.  Anyone?  --BRossow 00:25, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox improvement? 

message: Why is it that they have totally gone against the body shape of the camero from the 90s onwards?? Its given up its sporty looks to look like a freaking bmw? why? Jackpot Den 23:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Um...what?  The fourth-generation Camaro looks like a catfish (and I say that with my family having owned two, a '94 and a '01).  Hardly sporty.  I also don't see the BMW, unless your automotive tastes are such that anything with round headlights mounted in a vertical, rectangular grille automatically is a Bavarian überwagen.  It's quite clearly taking its design cues from the '67-'69, which is regarded by the majority of the automotive world as the best looking Camaro bar none.  The values of a restored '67-'69 reflect that. Ayocee 16:39, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your family owned two catfish? (^_^)Gzuckier 18:07, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, one with a LT1 and one with a LS1.  Fast as hell, too :D Ayocee 00:51, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New generations - meant to piss on their heratige? 

message: Could someone who knows how make the production numbers for each generation into little breakout boxes that sit on the right side of the page near the top of each generation's section? It would tidy things up and shorten it a little, of which the article is in dire need. BabuBhatt 20:11, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Production numbers
Talk:Maxim (philosophy)

message: There's a comment on the page saying that the article is a copy? If someone thinks that that's the case, I can rewrite the content. If I do so, it probably won't be as eloquent, but it wouldn't be a copyright infringment, partially because I haven't read that entry. Also, FYI, I'm not watching this page, so ping my talk page if you'd like me to do so. McKay (talk) 16:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: Are quotes in other languages okay? Is there any value at all?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meitme (talk • contribs) 20:12, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  German quote? 
Talk:Metaphysics of Morals

message: Hastie's translation, The Philosophy of Law,  vn2, says:  "It appeared soon after Michaelmas 1796, but with the year 1797 on the title-page.  This has given rise to some confusion regarding the date of the first Edition, which is now usually quoted as 1796-7.  (Schubert, Kant's Werke, Bd. ix, viii., and Biographie, p. 145.)" Errantios (talk) 00:20, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication 1796 or 1797
Talk:Gardens of the World with Audrey Hepburn

message: Can anyone list the gardens she visited in her TV series?198.177.27.23 (talk) 07:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of gardens visited 

message: Were there 9 episodes or 8? 96.232.173.175 (talk) 23:22, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Discrepancy
Talk:Modern Moral Philosophy

message: Leaving aside the question of whether a single paper (which is not in fact as influential as the article claims) warrants a separate article, this needs wikifying and copy-editing. --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 10:09, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added , which fixes this. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 17:19, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006–2007 discussions

message: I have fixed the sourcing of the theses. I also doubted its notability when I first saw it, but at least three academic books, the first of which had multiple contributors, have been published which are largely geared around this specific essay:
* O'Hear, A. (Ed.). (2004). Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521603263.
* Richter, D.J. (2013). Ethics After Anscombe: Post "Modern Moral Philosophy". Springer Netherlands. ISBN: 9789401714785.
* Regan, M. J. (2023). The 'Should' of Elizabeth Anscombe's 'Modern Moral Philosophy' and Philip Foot's Natural Goodness to Flourish. Abhinay. ISBN: 9781805244288.
It is uncommon for specific papers to have that kind of impact, so I think the article should stand, at least after improvements are made. I am unable to access the last book, but I hope to improve the article later with material from the former two. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 17:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, I've done it. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 15:42, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: State of this article, 2023-10-30
Talk:Philosophical Fragments

message: The Oxford World's Classics series translates the title as "Philosophical Crumbs" (published 2009). Maybe someone could create a page with this title as a redirect to this article (I have no idea how to do this). Thanks and regards. 81.83.141.139 (talk) 13:15, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative title 
Talk:Oxygen window

message: Shouldn't this article be renamed? The oxygen window is not specific to technical diving - it relates to all decompression doesn't it? Wouldn't Oxygen window or Oxygen window (decompression) (in case there is another type of non-diving oxygen window) be better? Mark.murphy 19:56, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming

message: In "and to push gradient at the shallower depths of the decompression curve, thus creating an S-shaped curve":-
#What is a "decompression curve"?
#What is "pushing gradient"?
Anthony Appleyard 17:20, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What is a decompression curve?

message: Rubicon Foundation per se have nothing to do with the subject. If there is pertinent info in the repository details of the search parameters would be helpful. Perhaps the general DAN link is also inappropriate here - searching on "window" only produces their Newsletter! Both links seem to be there primarily to promote a website. Either link might be acceptable on a more general page on diving. Finavon 22:27, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rubicon Foundation 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: page moved.  Andrewa (talk) 19:08, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Oxygen window in diving decompression →  – A glance at a Web search suggests the term "oxygen window" is overwhelmingly used in the context of diving, and so this article should be at that name as the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Old discussion on this page suggests the term may see use in other contexts, but seeing as the effect is always based on the same underlying physiology, a single article can probably address these aspects in different sections. 47.155.96.47 (talk) 22:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 July 2021
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Organized Labour/Outreach

message: I have publicized this project in two ways:
1. An article in the British monthly magazine Labour Research, which is also published to my blog, here.
2. A message to the 45,000 email subscribers to LabourStart on 7 September 2006 which read:
WIKIPEDIA: TRADE UNIONISTS GET ORGANIZED
Many of you will know about the Wikipedia -- the free online encyclopedia with its five million articles in 229 languages.  But what you may not know is that a group of trade unionists has gotten together online to ensure that the trade union movement is properly and systematically covered.  This is a hugely important enterprise and I strongly encourage you to have a look, sign up, and do your bit.
Eric Lee
ericlee@labourstart.org
:Good work! :) - Francis Tyers · 15:34, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

message: This page is under discussion, and the format currently displayed should be seen only as my personal suggestion. I hope this is a starting point to something.--Bookandcoffee 19:25, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added a boilerplate welcome template, could do with some Labour specific details. - Francis Tyers · 15:37, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: under construction
Talk:The Sickness unto Death

message: This is a nice summary. It would be better if it included a fuller description of the Kierkegaardians self. The description of despair should include Kierkegaards technical formulations. Also, there should be something about the formulations earlier in the work before considerations about the relation to God.
D. Winchell (talk) 02:35, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page states grossly inacurate views as to the content and meaning of this work, which is very misleading.  The first two paragraphs and the last one give the strong impression that Kierkegaard was pro-Christianity.  In fact, he was very much anti-Christianity, and this book was aimed at the current Christian mentality, which he despised, and as is stated throughout his text.  Similarly, how does Kierkegaard equate his concept of despair to the Christian's concept of sin?  Kierkegaard, in several passages, claims that the Christian concept of sin is irrelevant and obsolete.  One is not supposed to interpret his use of words, such as "God," in a literal sense.  Many believe that his book was positing a secularist perspective, and the concept of God was to be used as a metaphor.  There was also a mention of Kierkegaard being in-ligne with Socrates, which is also fictitious.  While he admired Socrates, he thought Socrates had it all wrong.  
Sincerely,
a Columbia University student who has just written 2 dissertations on Kierkegaard.
72.89.117.54 (talk) 06:42, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inacurate representation of The Sickness Unto Death