Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amiga

message: For now, I've tagged every article and category (as well as subcategories of these categories) in :Category:Commodore Amiga, with the following exceptions:
* Action Replay - This article has plenty of coverage from modern video game enthusiasts.  If you feel that the Amiga aspect of this is important enough to merit this being included in the project anyway, feel free to tag it.
* Genlock - Based on the article's talk page, this appears to have nothing to do with Amiga.
Most of the articles in the subcategories should probably be tagged, but what about the games? --Anivron 06:33, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have tagged every Amiga article (hardware, software, companies, OS4 games etc) that I could find, except all Amiga games, there are many more to tag in :Category:Amiga games. --Marko75 (talk) 16:26, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

text: But what about the games? Should all Amiga games be included in this project, it can be many. Maybe too many to focus on, or? --Marko75 (talk) 22:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Genlock: Amiga Video Connector generated natively genlocked signal. It is a common hardware Amiga fact. External devices were just used to add an incoming TV signal, and output the mixed signal directed to any VCR, or TV broadcast device. The user could also use the external device to trimmer the intensity of one of the two input signals (TV or Amiga) and output it with various intensities of visibility. I think that genlock article deserves to be categorized with Amiga too, but only if someone will create into it a section dedicated to Amiga Hardware native feature of Genlock Techology, and I am not very skilled with professional terminology of TV signals and genlocking. Sincerely, --Raffaele Megabyte (talk) 20:49, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article tagging 

message: To any participants, feel free to make the project page and policies more closely resemble the WikiProjects of other computing platforms.  Wikipedia:WikiProject Macintosh's page has many nice elements and policies, for example. --Anivron 06:41, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project Page Content and Style 

message: Just a quick point, the Amiga logo is unlikely to be fair use for the talk page template. You'd be better off using a freely licenced image of an actual Amiga (there are several on the commons ) Alexj2002 15:13, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to use this :Template:User Amiga and :Template:User AmigaOS --Marko75 (talk) 01:18, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article talk page template

message: Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory.  This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.  B2T2 00:01, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project directory 

message: Is this wikiproject still active? I've started working on the Amiga web browser articles today (as a new version of IBrowse has just been released), and I thought I'd check if the project is still active before tagging their talk pages. --Safalra 20:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course it is :) 80.28.117.98 12:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it still active? Marko75 (talk) 23:21, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

text: I have left a personal note to all members on their talk pages --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 04:45, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Project active?

message: Currently this project is INACTIVE. I propose to revive this project and make this project more active by making this as a task force of WP:COMPUTING. The pages will remain the same...It will use the common  banner for the pages that falls in the scope of this project. The banner will be enabled with this project parameters with also WP 1.0 assessment parameters. Hence the project will get seperate stats for this project / workgroup - both quality scale and importance. Thoughts ?? --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 03:16, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have left a personal note to all members on their talk pages --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 04:45, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Important Proposal

message: Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention.  Badbilltucker 17:44, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Articles are tagged with the new banner parameters and the old banner replaced --  Tinu Cherian  - 06:50, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Day Awards 

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection before December 2008, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 16:14, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Amiga 

message: Hi!  I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate.  This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group.  If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 04:43, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinators' working group 

message: Apologies for the notice, but this is being posted to every WikiProject to avoid accusations of systemic bias. Hiding T  13:21, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:NOT#PLOT 

message: Is anyone able to provide more sources for the above article, particularly those relating to the subject's activities in the Amiga community? GreenReaper (talk) 23:00, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing of [[Eric W. Schwartz]] 

message: I have started doing a tentative draft copy for the article, but I'm struggling to find sources. Is there anyone who would be willing to help me out or at least point me in the right direction as far as sources are concerned? --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 04:17, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Eyetech Article

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 02:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone.  Articles were selected based on their assessed  importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Amiga articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details.  You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010.  As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide.  Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback! 
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 00:09, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amiga articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release 

message: Would anyone be interested in article alerts for this project? Wikipedia:WikiProject Amiga/Article alerts is broken at the moment because it depends on the old  template. If anyone's interested I'd be happy to set it up to use a category. If not, I'll just remove the subscription. --Pnm (talk) 03:49, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article alerts 2 

message: Template:WikiProject Amiga has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. This is the old template that was combined into , which has only a few lingering transclusions. Pnm (talk) 04:02, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion discussion for old WP Amiga banner 

message: Does anyone know where I can find any information on Amidock? I am trying to start doing an article on it but I cannot find any information. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 13:43, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I made a brief explaination of Amidock here Amiga_software#Various_Utilities Amidock on wikipedia. Infos could be asked to AmigaOS 4.0 developers (check for them on Amiga Forum sites). To obtainn further infos you could checking on aminet repository online by inspecting who are the authors of various Amiga Dock utilities and ask them by sending some mails requesting them for infos. Sincerely, --Raffaele Megabyte (talk) 21:25, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amidock information 

message: Could someone help me maintaing the articles about Amiga software and derivates, by helping me developing a full chronology timeline of mainstream Amiga software? I am very busy with real life at the moment. Thank you in anticipation. --Raffaele Megabyte (talk) 21:28, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amiga Software Chronology 

message: The article Amiga E has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
:No sign of notability
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bulwersator (talk) 10:19, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[Amiga E]] 

message: Strange to not be able to add a discussion message on the topic site itself, so I have to place it here. The source code from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_User_Interface is not working to compile properly. It says it is a complete example but compiling with 'gcc -o example example.c' only gives: example.c:6: parse error before string constant.
92.195.108.134 (talk) 09:46, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong sourcecode on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_User_Interface 

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: I have just created an article for the World of Commodore (later World of Amiga) series of expos.  It seems to me that this topic is of prime importance to this WikiProject—these shows were where Commodore (and later Amiga Technologies) made most of its product announcements and releases.  The shows attracted significant coverage in most major Commodore- and Amiga-themed magazines, and this coverage is the main source of Amiga history.
My area of expertise is in Commodore's 8-bit line, so I'm not really in a position to make sure the article appropriately covers all the Amiga news.  (News reporting on the expos is chock full of references to Amiga companies and Amiga products, but I am not familiar enough with the technology or the names to know who or what is important.)  It would be great if someone more knowledgeable with things Amiga could expand the article with coverage of the World of Amiga expos which took place from 1995 to 2002, and maybe also check the sources against what I've already written to make sure I haven't left out anything important. —Psychonaut (talk) 23:48, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  World of Amiga 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: Hello all. I have just created the Amiga Portal and have the basic skeleton up. Any contributors are welcome to add material there (do remember that on Portals all media must be free, not fair use). I'll be trying to spiff it up over the next week or two. H.dryad (talk) 13:07, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portal 

message: Adding this to the list of defunct WikiProjects. Have tried to contact all of the active members and none replied and most have not posted anything in at least six months. Retiring this project for now. Would be willing to help if anyone is interested in getting it going again. Cheers. H.dryad (talk) 14:45, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Note not all of us are checking Wikipedia daily (eg. Marko75 edited not even 2 months ago and usualy has several months gap between edits). Sure, project is not very active, undead like Amiga... There are still some other more or less regular editors (like myelf) caring for Amiga articles without formal affiliation to project.Pavlor (talk) 07:09, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Glad to hear that. I just started editing the articles a few weeks ago and did not see that much activity but glad to see that some people are still at it. H.dryad (talk) 23:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunct 

message: The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.
Portals are being redesigned.
The new design features are being applied to existing portals.
At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template .
The discussion about this can be found here.
Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass.  Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.
=== Background ===
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    07:25, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject collaboration notice from the [[WP:WPPORT|Portals WikiProject]] 

message: On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    07:25, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background 

message: :Portal:Amiga, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Amiga and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of :Portal:Amiga during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:04, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: MfD nomination of [[:Portal:Amiga]]

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:23, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources