Talk:The Libertine (2005 film)

message: Depp's prologue
:"Ladies, an announcement. I am up for it  … all the time."  etc
reminds me of  The Duke. And you know he's a fan, I wonder if it, er, informed his part? Paul Tracy|\talk 21:51, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Prologue

message: As this was first shown in 2004, but released in 2005, should the title be The Libertine (2004 film) or The Libertine (2005 film)? sjorford (talk) 11:01, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In the entertainment industry, a film is not considered "released" until it's put in theaters. The AMPAS Oscar rules, for example, peg the release date to the first theatrical showing, not the first film festival showing. When the movie is available to the unwashed masses at a local cinema, then it's "released." If it's only screened at a place like the Cannes Film Festival, it's not officially "released." This whole thing can be complicated because some films will be screened at a film festical and simultaneously released in theaters. The Tribeca Film Festival is sort of famous for doing this.BehroozZ 16:24, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year? 

message: According to the official site (and others), the film is not released yet... Supposed to be released in the USA March 10, 2006.  I think that the page should reflect this, and possible reasons why, if they are known? 70.252.51.251 03:28, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The film had a limited one-week release on November 25, 2005, to qualify for 2005/2006 awards and then had a full release on March 10, 2006. BehroozZ 16:37, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release Date 

message: :Image:The Libertine film.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 12:17, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:The Libertine film.jpg

message: Do we really need this huge list of violinists etc.? There are so many red links... and the list is really not important to the film at all.--Welcome to the dark side. (talk) 01:13, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personnel of the Orchestra 

message: The plot section of this film entry is much too long, overly detailed, and poorly written. I intend to return to tighten it up, if no one objects. I've already cleaned up the article a good deal. Comments and suggestions welcome. --TEHodson 23:00, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You can use WP:FILMPLOT as a guide. Let me know if you need help researching real-world coverage of this film. Erik (talk | contribs) 16:53, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I think this is much better. What did you have in mind for "real-world coverage"? --TEHodson 06:59, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: We could have a production section and a critical reception section. There may be enough critical analysis for its own section; I found this and this. It looks like Depp has a few books about him in which this film is discussed. Also possible is a historical accuracy section, but it may be best merged elsewhere. This mentions historical accuracy. Erik (talk | contribs) 13:33, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you want to go ahead and start? I spent many hours shortening the plot section (and after the first night, when I spent 6 hours on it, I came back to find someone had flagged the plot section "too long." I couldn't believe it! They should have seen what was here before--a short novel practically, and not even a well-written one. But I shortened it some more and removed the flag. I'm a bit burnt out on this, but I love the film, so if you want to rough in what you think should go into the sections you've named, I'll be happy to come back and talk about it, make suggestions, etc. Do you think the plot is tight enough yet, or should it be briefer still? --TEHodson 06:47, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've cut it down a bit more. Red Fiona (talk) 17:26, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Libertine (2004 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928042241/http://www.hollywoodjesus.com/movie/libertine/notes.pdf to http://www.hollywoodjesus.com/movie/libertine/notes.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:24, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified