lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Crypt of Civilization

message: I'm just being curious about one thing that I couldn't find anywhere on the Crypt's website, how is it supposed to only be opened in 8113? Because it seems that the purpose is written somewhere, but, it seems that basically nothing prevents it from being opened anytime before, right?
: Technically, you're correct.  *Any* time capsule could be opened at any time before the date the capsule's creators have specified.  But the reason the Crypt's creators selected 8113 as the opening date for the Crypt was because they figured that if the Crypt was created at 4000-some years after the beginning of historical fixed date recording ---- and what the Crypt represents is everything that has been achieved up to that point -- then why not have the Crypt be opened 4000 years later?  That would place the Crypt chronologically at the half-way point on the gigantic master timeline.   This point is addressed on both the Crypt's official site as well as here in the Wiki article.OUPetey 16:58, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Any particular reason for the extra spacing between sentences and paragraphs? Should it not be single space?--Doug Coldwell talk 23:37, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spacing between sentences 

message: When was the crypt sealed? This should be stated explicitly in the first paragraph. One part of the article states that the crypt was converted from a swimming pool to a storage space between 1937 and 1940, but a later section states that the crypt was sealed in 1936. J. Finkelstein (talk) 17:44, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has been corrected to 1940 as the sealing date.--Doug Coldwell talk 18:23, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was the crypt sealed? 

message: There was no 0 year between 1 BC and 1 AD. It means that there is a period in 6176 years between 4241 BC and 1936 AD. Therefore, 6176 years since 1936 AD is 8112 AD. Nicolas Love (talk) 18:23, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thornwell Jacobs made a mistake in the calculation 

message: This article is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems.  An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements.  Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page.  MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment
Talk:CHUO-FM

message: This article is not the place for CHUO to toot its own horn about how proud it is of its own volunteers — Wikipedia is a neutral encyclopedia, not a press release database. The notables section needs to be cleaned up to read like it's in an encyclopedia, rather than a CHUO fan club letter. Bearcat (talk) 03:41, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone tag
Talk:U.S. Route 209

message: Why is this article so thin? I'mm planning to create a separate U.S. Route 209 in New York article; perhaps one for PA is also in order. Daniel Case 16:19, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, the difference a few months makes... --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 08:50, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Couldn't it be devolved to the articles on the road in both states, now that they exist, with just a more general summary left here? A lot of it is really better suited for the state articles. Daniel Case 18:51, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No problems with that; however, some history needs to be kept in this article so that it doesn't turn into a stubby section. As it is now, this article is B-class - removing the history completely would demote it to start-class. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 23:09, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what I said. What's here should be a general history of the road, i.e. when it began to exist as Route 209 in both states. The state-specific histories belong in the individual articles. Daniel Case 05:30, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

text: On another note, why a US route that enters only two states needs an article for each state, I'll never know, but that's another argument for another time and place. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 23:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well ... even the NY segment is longer than a number of our state highways. I'd say that if the PA segment were written about in the depth it deserved within the same article, it and the NY segment would result in a route description that would make the article ridiculously long. Note that there are two US 13 articles as well for PA and DE.Maybe we should have a rule regarding when a separate article need not be written (we seem to be doing OK in NYSR without a separate article on the NJ portion of US 9W, and I doubt we'll ever need "U.S. Route 2 in New York" unless we want to give incredibly short US highway segments the same honor we give NY 437. Daniel Case 05:30, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ooops, my apologies. US 13 is a lot longer than I gave it credit for. Daniel Case 05:36, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History section
Talk:Boorana

message: Most of the text in this article seems to be about the Oromo in general, and is not specific to the Borana. I'm thinking that this should either be merged with Oromo, or move the more general text to Oromo, though the latter this would leave a pretty short article. (Another "merge to" target might be Gadaa; see Talk:Gadaa.) -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 04:58, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the text in question to Oromo. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 18:52, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The image have no source to back it And I changed to image that have. I don’t understand, do facts doesn’t matter? Anyone can put whatever images they want on pages? Hzted6 (talk) 04:48, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Stick Orderly

message: ===Copyeditting===
I've copyedited up the article and removed the  tag. // Pathoschild 05:07, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: October 2005

message: I've copyedited up the article and removed the  tag. // Pathoschild 05:07, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyeditting

message: I'm going to assume this is a British term, but there is no indication of where this came from. Donovan Ravenhull 15:11, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Nationality?
Talk:Tomales Bay

message: In the "see also", there's a link to "Freak wave", but no explaination there or here.  Are there frequent freak waves in Tomales bay?  --24.143.152.205 05:09, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There have been some fatal events there, in which people strolling on the beach have been washed out to sea. We should try to document a few. -Willmcw 03:43, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:British Rail Class 950

message: we would like to know about rail bus (dmu 141 )that going to out service and parking . for inform tell WHAT  there is 7 DMU  in IRAN and inservice .
: Yes, for that you would have to see British Rail Class 141, which isn't quite been written yet. — Dunc|☺ 21:12, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  dmu 141
Talk:I, Jedi

message: In I, Jedi, Coran goes to Yavin IV before going to Corellia to see his grandfather.  The information given to him has no influence over his going to Yavin IV for training. --TychoZzyx 05:50, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: True. But that's not the point. The point is that he went to Yavin IV for general Force training- not to become a Jedi.  When he visited Corellia- then he changed his mind and decided to become a CorSec-trained Jedi, not a CorSec officer with Jedi training. --Maru (talk) 18:09, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motivation 

message: Shouldn't there be some mention of Elegos, since he is a major character and Corran's conscience for the third act?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.14.236 (talk) 03:37, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters 
Talk:Nunt

message: Nunt is not a pastry, it is a a literary result of a man's journey through life.
I also don't see how nunt is a pastry, according to the Wiki definition which is:  "Pastry is the name given to various kinds of dough made from ingredients such as flour, butter, shortening, baking powder and/or eggs."  Nunt sound delicious but they do not sound dough-based.
:Part of the article is in German, suggesting it was translated from German Wikipedia? Perhaps it is a traditional German-Jewish thing? I am of German-Jewish descent, but I have never heard of this. --D. Breslauer (talk) 15:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Und jawohl: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nunt . See also the article creation summary. --D. Breslauer (talk) 15:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Jaxl

message: Gosh. I hadn't realized this was closing so soon. Dragons flight or Jaxl (or anyone else), if you disagree with my belated comments and would like to reply despite the closure, please reply here or on my talk page. I should have noted the time before posting—would probably have commented on Df's page instead. Very sorry.—encephalon 06:06, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Loogie

message: — JIP | Talk 12:21, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Old VfD

message: I deleted some of the content, which consisted of original research.  This article still sucks, but less so now. --Xyzzyplugh 22:36, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed

message: This is not used anywhere else in the world. And should be removed from the the category: vocabulary.
This article defines what is so great about Wikipedia. Good luck finding 'Loogie' in your Collier's!
"Silly Americanism," "This is not used anywhere else in the world."? How do you know? Why wouldn't it be used anywhere else? It's a natural proccess which actually helps you to do it if you're sick. That was a complete waste of time to write that; it was narrow-minded and racist. Also, what's with the line, "...Produces a temporary feeling of power in the loogie-hocker."? Why would that make somebody feel powerful? I don't feel like when when I hock loogies, and I've hocked plenty today, as I have a congestive-related illness.--WatchHawk 00:50, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A silly Americanism. 

message: As a kid in the 60's I was told that  lugurt was the proper name of spit by older kids in the neighborhood. Didn't hear phlegm untill mid 70's 2601:644:800:7820:15B4:B193:746B:E76F (talk) 07:06, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lugurt 

message: In order to help make this article more properly encyclopedic, shouldn't we add such basic information as the etymology and earliest usages of this term? 98.123.38.211 (talk) 02:40, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add to article
Talk:Bleem!

message: Their marketing for example, it was quite fascinating at the end.  It always had some anti-Sony theme to it, just watch the BleemCast! Metal gear Solid trailer.
Or the PC Bleem! issues, like David's own rant about why it was stopped.
Or the initial e-mail they sent on the internet to numerous emulation news sites in '98.
So many topics, and that is just scratching the surface.  EMU-LMAO (talk) 23:15, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  So many topics about this company can be made. 

message: 1. According to the BleemCast E3 Press release in May 2000, they launched Bleem! in May 1999, not March of 1999.  Do you believe an official company press release or some unknown source?
Selling over 250,000 units at that time.
2. Calling it by "the Bleem company" is a rather blanket term.  The Bleem! company was initially called Bleem LLC., then becoming Bleem Inc. sometime in 2000.  Early Bleem Demos and their archived website content shows this change in business strategy.
--EMU-LMAO (talk) 00:12, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors. 

message: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What about Bleem!'s other/restored website, "Bleem Park" (like the show, South Park)? Can we put that up on the article? (http://bleempark.emuunlim.com) {--2001:558:6032:0:2953:8DFE:E48F:DE8F (talk) 00:38, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The other website to/of "Bleem!". 
Talk:Laurie Oakes

message: Most of this article appears to be copied from http://news.ninemsn.com.au/general.aspx?id=63374. All the author has done is changed phrases like "which has spanned" into "spanning". This article is more like a copy rather than a paraphrased version of the source.
:Ah. That explains the phrases like this one:  "Oakes's political commentary is often cutting"  (sic) And also this one:   "His interviewing style is equally incisive, and based on good research"    203.214.155.23 10:39, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Large chunks of unverifiable and poorly copied material here, including claims that could be considered libellous. Temporarily removed unsubstantiated/weasel word-related material in accordance with Wikipedia rules concerning famous personages Malusmoriendumest (talk) 14:02, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Laurie's been known for decades as a very, very big man, but of recent months he's lost a great deal of weight.  He looks pretty healthy, so I presume it's diet/exercise/stomach stapling/whatever and not some horrible disease.  Does anyone know his secret?  --  JackofOz 15:11, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: His weight loss
Talk:List of Korean ceramic artists and sculptors

message: I have made this a composite of various potential lists.  If some-one thinks that potters, ceramic artists, and sculptors (and??) do not belong on the same page, then make a more approiate listingsystem, but be sure to correctlinksto what-ever ends up. Kdammers 07:10, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

message: Speedy deletion can only be done for very specific reasons, listed at WP:CSD. These don't include "unnotable and unneeded". If you think that this should be deleted then you need to follow the procedure at WP:AFD to list it for a deletion discussion. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:18, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Can someone put this up for AFD for me? I haven't before, Raiku Lucifer Samiyaza 19:21, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Read the WPP:CSD.  this article does not qualify.Kdammers (talk) 01:28, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion
Talk:Bill Maas

message: There are a lot of un-cited claims in this article. I was able to find sources for a couple of them, but not for all. Changed some of the wording to be more objective, because parts of this read like promotional material. Also, why is "Legal Issues" the very first section? Isn't it far more common to put them in the middle of the article or at the end? Arrowhead1014 (talk) 01:14, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Issues
Talk:Felgercarb

message: Since Frak is worthy of (only?) a redirect, it seemed logical that "Felgercarb" ought to as well. Of course, Frak is a much more used term, much more familiar, and once had its own page, as it surely will again some day. Unfortunately, Felgercarb has not caught on like Frak has and thus is currently only significant enough to get this redirect. Perhaps when Battlestar Galactica (2003) uses Felgercarb (that's an IF, really), it will gain more history and varying views on its origin, significance and relevance.
VigilancePrime 07:38, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  FULLY EXPECTING someone will revert this page back into a redirect. While I was originally against a simple redirect for Frak (not so much for Felgercarb), the mods to the BSG main pages are more than sufficient now. I, though, am not comfortable being the one making that ultimate decision, but would support Phil or Kross (more experienced on Wiki) doing such a revert. Maybe one day this can have its own (large) article on Wiki (I have found MANY articles that are essentially expanded word definitions), but not today. VigilancePrime 02:41, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Epson PX-8 Geneva

message: There was an internal 300 baud modem; I don't recall now whether it was part of the PX-8 itself or the 64k ramdisk module.
-- 
The modem was part of the ram disk unit. Concept14 22:30, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ram disk + extra battery capacity.  I have one of these at home.  It was a great machine.  One of the first truly portable laptops. Sgbeamer (talk) 00:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Special:BrokenRedirects

message: Add :Category:Redirects to special pages Dpleibovitz (talk) 22:42, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:03, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 31 May 2018 

message: Special:BrokenRedirects hasn't been updated since 10 September 2018. It is normally updated every three days. Is there a bug or anything wrong with this special page and some others like Special:DoubleRedirects which also hasn't been updated. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:24, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It is four days in and it still hasn't been updated. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:16, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

text: Update to current 2022 2603:9000:F300:7308:FC61:DB22:3F38:B4DC (talk) 20:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken redirects bug 

message: There are a few user pages that appear on the Special:BrokenRedirects list even though they have valid redirects. I guess they are false positives and they appear on every list of broken redirects I've seen recently. Is there a way to correct this and get them off the list? They are:
*User:Meisam.fa
*User:JackLantern and
*User:Mvvnlightbabe
I'd post this comment on the talk page of the bot who compiles this list but there is no information about this on the page. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 00:58, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, File:NYCS map 9.svg always appears on this list even though it isn't a reirect. But it doesn't seem like this talk page is checked very often. Liz Read! Talk! 18:37, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another bug?
Wikipedia talk:Stress alerts

message: I've removed a "sick user" alert, which has been posted up for 7 months already. It doesn't make sense to keep it, since a person who fell ill 7 months later should have recovered already, or if anything left Wikipedia, or even the Earth. --Deryck C. 14:26, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sick for 7 months? 

message: Going away----HamedogTalk|@ 05:24, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  See Ya
Category talk:Normans

message: This category is unable to distinguish between Normans and absolutely everybody born in Normandy. --Wetman 08:16, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Does this matter? I notice, for example, that :Category:Welsh people doesn't distinguish between Mediaeval Welsh people and Welsh people from other historical periods. Would Natives of Normandy be better, perhaps? Man vyi 07:15, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:North Midland Railway

message: Didn't Robert Stephenson also do a lot of work on this line?Linuxlad 09:08, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: George vs Robert

message: I've removed these for the time being as they weren't North Midland stations. Will replace with date when more info available, like Derby Nottingham Road. Chevin (talk) 16:47, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Were they Midland stations? Talltim (talk) 22:13, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Oh yes, they were built by the Midland and could be added in once articles were written, since the page describes the New Road which also was not the North Midland but part of its later development. Chevin (talk) 08:33, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for picking up on that then. I dug out my copy of 'The North Midland Railway Guide' (1842) and it doesn't show the stations. BTW do you know what the copyright status of the engravings reproduced in it would be? I would have thought that they would be out of copyright by now and could possibly used in this and station articles. Talltim (talk) 10:53, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorted it out. Whittington was not built till 1861, Barrow Hill was originally Staveley. I imagine the originals of the engravings, which were commissioned by the NMR by Samuel Russell, would be out of copyright by now. Chevin (talk) 15:33, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Whittington and Barrow Hill

message: Broomhouse tunnel (on the "New Road") no longer exists as it was opened out in 1969.
The relevant Railway Magazine article is July 1969 P409 and there`s a picture of the work in progress in the same years November edition on P636. I don`t know how to alter or amend the graphic so could someone else do that !  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JustinSmith (talk • contribs) 10:52, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevertheless it did exist originally and its history is given in the article about it. Chevin (talk) 11:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broomhouse Tunnel
Talk:Hyperion

message: This page would be more accurately titled Hyperion (disambiguation). The original Hyperion, from whom all others ultimately derive is the titan of Greek mythology. --Wetman 09:46, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Derivation is irrelevant. What is important is commonality of usage. And I think that there are several meanings of similar prominence. --Eyrian 01:51, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree with Wetman.  Hyperion, the Greek Titan, should be the default page for "Hyperion".  OhioFred (talk) 01:06, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Hyperion

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Hyperion (mythology) - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 00:40, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There's a situation with this page that going on with Jerry (given name) and Dante (name). People keep adding examples of things from Hypixel, and other people keep reverting the edits because they think that it's not notable enough. Personally, I think that the Hypixel examples belong here, but I think we should reach a consensus. Are these OK here and the other places? RteeeeKed (talk) 21:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hypixel pain
Talk:Odinstårnet

message: Height of the Tower
Note: Sources disagree regarding the correct height of the Tower. Some sources say it was 177 metres tall, others say 175 metres. --Valentinian 09:46, 1 October 2005 (UTC)