Talk:Mu'tazilism

message: As stated before, this is an opinion that is stated via a farfetched website based on economics. 
The first 3 website that appear on google regarding the Mu’tazilites don't mention anything regard them being celebrated. I would rather take the BBC, Britania, or the Oxford Bibliographies that give a neutral introduction over a random quote from a random website chosen to cherry-pick the editor in questions opinion. 
The person who kept changing this and called me a "troll" even admitted it was a minority opinion on the edit history page. If I wanted I could also find a million sources stated the Muʿtazila were hated - but I am not biased so I would not.
Please removed the "celebrated" comment, because as stated above, the main sources regarding the Muʿtazila do not mention this.
: The is no doubting to the fact that the Mutazalites were a very well known group during the Islamic Golden age, but the cited source is not a reliable one. I have removed that claim from the the article for now. Thank you. Mosesheron (talk) 14:42, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stating that the Muʿtazila were celebrated.  

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: MOVED.  Hadal (talk) 20:03, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Mutazilism →  – This page was recently moved from Mu'tazila to Mutazilism with the rationale "The current page title is a collective noun for adherents of the theological school, not the noun for the theological school itself, and needs to move to the format consistent with its peers: Atharism and Maturidism".I agree with the rationale, but omitting the straight apostrophe in the move target was a mistake: the version with the apostrophe is much more common, e.g. Google Scholar yields 347 results for "Mutazilism" vs 1,850 results for "Mu'tazilism". This is of course also consistent with what we have at Ash'arism. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 19:06, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 March 2023 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: WP:RMEC: initiated by a sockpuppet, and no other support for the move request at this time.  Dekimasuよ! 15:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Mu'tazilism →  – per WP:COMMONNAME.
* JSTOR: "Mu'tazilites" 1,416 results - "Mu'tazilism" 417 results
* Brill Publishers: "Mu'tazilites" 997 results - "Mu'tazilism" 250 results
* Taylor & Francis: "Mu'tazilites" 259 results - "Mu'tazilism" 60 results
* Google results: "Mu'tazilites" 149,000 results - "Mu'tazilism" 35,900 results  
And for consistency with former Islam-related sects such as Kharijites, not "Kharijism", Kaysanites, not "Kaysanism".  Kermanshehi (talk) 16:18, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Islam has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:00, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Religion has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 January 2024