Talk:Openreach

message: "the company is structured so that British Telecommunications plc (BT) is a wholly owned subsidiary" can't be right, surely? Dadge (talk) 19:20, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: For a company of such importance to the Telecom and Internet industry in the UK this article is surprisingly poor. I will try and redo the article over the next couple of days and add a lot of missing and relevant information. --Thsyrus (talk) 12:15, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Poor Quality Article

message: :Image:Openreach.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: TheIslander 19:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Openreach.gif

message: Openreach's publications give its address as 81 Newgate Street, London EC1A 7AJ which is the address of BT Group.  I would have more confidence that Openreach is "treating the rest of BT on an equal basis as other operators" (quote from BT Group article) if it had a separate address.  Does anybody know the address of Openreach's offices? Biscuittin (talk) 22:04, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Quote from Openreach's corporate brochure: "While Openreach remains part of the BT Group, we are a separate business with our own headquarters, identity, financial reporting and commercial principles". So where is this headquarters? Biscuittin (talk) 22:15, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Companies House Webcheck, there is a company called Open Reach at 16 New Street, Stourport-on-Severn, Worcestershire DY13 8UW but it is described as "dormant". Is this the same company? Biscuittin (talk) 22:22, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is misleading to describe Openreach as "a separate business" (see above) when it appears to be a division (business) rather than a subsidiary. Biscuittin (talk) 22:36, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Openreach's address 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Openreach. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100704094514/http://www.ofcom.org.uk:80/consult/ to http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:56, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I'd like to thank user:Maudael who helpfully spotted and reverted an expansion of this article "edited from a BT office IP without attribution - this is against Wikipedia rules" (as it says in the edit summary of the reversion). There are one or two edits by others inevitably caught up in the reversion and I'll have a go at salvaging anything worthwhile. Polly Tunnel (talk) 18:31, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I have used reference 12 in the article. Polly Tunnel (talk) 17:34, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest 

message: The article incorrectly states that Openreach engineers are actually technicians. This is incorrect. Openreach engineers have the job title "Customer Service Engineers" . This is because the engineers build and maintain a structure, in this case the wires, nodes, duct, exchanges and network terminating equipment that make up the telecommunications network. This fits well with the dictionary definition of an engineer, a technician meanwhile is defined as someone who simply looks after technical equipment. Housebunny321 (talk) 20:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Openreach engineers not technicians.