lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Olympus E-3

message: Just to clarify this claim made in promotions, the essence of which is set out below, quote:
"Among digital SLR cameras available as of October 17, 2007. When the ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 12-60mm f2.8-4.0 SWD lens is used with the E-3 at a focal length of 60mm (120mm: 35mm equivalent). Based on Olympus's in-house measurement conditions."
I.e the claim is only good for the E-3, used with that lens, at that particular focal length (60mm).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.42.43.176 (talk) 21:14, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 'Worlds fastest AF' claim
Talk:Piers Wenger

message: The Guardian article says that Wenger is 35, which means he was probably born in 1972.  However, I didn't add that to the article because it's possible that his birthday is in late December, which would mean that he was born in 1971. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 23:59, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: With any luck his bio will be in the BBC press office pages soon!  --Karen | Talk | contribs 07:10, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthdate
Talk:He, She and It

message: I'm going to prod this article but a small {one liner) could be placed on the author's page. (my opinion). --Stormbay (talk) 00:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No way. This is a very notable book with a significant amount of scholarship dedicated to it. I removed the prod. Also, did you not notice that it says in the lede that this book won the Arthur C Clarke Award? That's a notable award, too, and winning it per se establishes notability, frankly. (Plus, an article written 3+ years ago with more than 30 edits is not really a good candidate for PROD.) --Lquilter (talk) 00:23, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Martin Luther King High School (Riverside, California)

message: I hope to soon be adding a section about the controversy surrounding the naming of Martin Luther King High School. I am in the process of collecting scholarly sources about this, as I can't rely on my memory alone. A section about "King High Remembers" should be added, as the relevant link in "External Links" is not explained and it's is a major program at the school. The "Choirs", ""Riverside Kingsmen" Band and Colorguard", and the "Athletics" sections need major cleanup, both grammatically and stylistically. Choirgrl27 (talk) 03:14, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: A lot of content about the school's academic and extracurricular achievements were removed in  this and similar edits. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:35, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Academics and extracurriculars
Talk:USS Ontario (1863)

message: Ships with DANFS entries are inherently notable. Give this article a chance. Ships that were never completed can have enough information to become featured articles with a little research. See  (Featured Article) and  (A-Class/FAC); both of these ships were never completed. -MBK004 00:10, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CSD Contested
Talk:Premature convergence

message: Don't know if it's sufficient now. if it's not, please tell. If it's enough, then someone can remove the context-tag, i don't dare to! --Private meta (talk) 00:16, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Context Tag

message: The panmictic population model often used in EAs can be regarded as a possible reason for premature convergence. This has been described in a new section.
In my opinion, the article suffers from its focus on genetic algorithms, although the described effect of premature convergence occurs in all or at least most EAs. This is also evident in the present text, for example when Ingo Rechenberg and Günther Rudolph, two researchers known for their work on evolution strategies, are quoted. I have therefore taken the liberty of replacing the term genetic algorithms with evolutionary algorithms in appropriate places. In addition, the term evolutionary strategy was changed to the commonly used term evolution strategy. Studi90 (talk) 16:54, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New section about "panmictic populations" and some remarks
Talk:Seeb

message: Is Seeb really a different city or it is now included in Muscat city? Paolotacchi (talk) 18:18, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Seeb and Muscat

message: Assalamualaikum,hello Good morning, 
 Im talking about the road work going ahead in Mabellah industrial area Road No2. Alhamdulillah working is going good but one big issue is when rain or flood happens the water stays for more than months on that road for which our work and business both stops, so me and my other brothers are requesting you to lift da road little higher than before size ,i mean not to put its old size again please because workers are from Al Turki they told us to contact Municipallity about this issue, almost all shop people facing this problem and they want it to sort out in better way. Make Road No.2 more in height to the level of all shops for which rain water should not store. Thank you 37.40.212.25 (talk) 15:36, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Road No.2 working in Seeb mabella Industrial area
Talk:Short-term conflict alert

message: Have re-worded and added some content - does this make the article easier to understand? A300st (talk) 00:28, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

message: I found this article confusing in some ways.
1) The STCA is a "concept", but is also an "element" in the ATC system? Does that mean TCAS, airway and flight plan are physical things, but STCA isn't? 
2) What "other safety nets" would have failed by the time STCA is used?
3) Does an STCA actually monitor the other "failed" systems? Or is there just an overlap in the time STCA and other systems are covering planes approaching one another?
4) The STCA alerts controllers: but aren't there also similar things that alert pilots? It would be interesting to know how they work together, since according to the article, there are different STCAs.
Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 08:53, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information needed to clarify 
Talk:Singapore Airlines Flights 21 and 22

message: Two different times are given as the landing time, both in the same time zone. This is a minor issue, but unfortunately I do not have the availible time to research the landing time of this flight and fix it. When i do, I will fix the article. Until then, maybe someone else will get it done.littlebum2002 14:37, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The article says that the flight took off from Newark at 23:00 EDT and landed in Singapore at 16:05 EDT. If my maths are correct that's seventeen hours and five minutes. The article also says that the flight time was 18.5 hours, and most newspaper reports describe it as "almost 19 hours". Has something gone wrong with the time conversion, e.g. by not accounting for daylight savings time? Frustratingly the only sources for the schedules I can find are mirrors of Wikipedia or the shells of autogenerated schedule listings that no longer work.  -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 21:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Time Problem

message: Goh Choon Phong explained that the A340-500s consumed too much fuel, they decided to sell back the aircraft to Airbus. (Video interview: http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/despite-turbulence-low/2315558.html) Xizuki (talk) 04:01, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  SIA CEO explains the reason the flight was retired 
Talk:Project Strato-Lab

message: Created content from the Victor Prather and Malcolm Ross (balloonist) articles. I intend to replace this content by a new researched article when I get time. I want to review Malcolm Ross articles, which may require traveling to a library or other archive that has old aviation materials. I also corrected a statement in the initial stub, which had indicated that the 5/4/1961 flight set a general aviation record for highest manned flight. In fact, the first manned orbital flight had already been completed on 4/12/1961 by Yuri Gagarin. On April 18, 1961 Georgi Mosolov reached a world-record altitude of 34714 meters (113901 feet) in a jet. The Ross/Prather balloon flight was for one day the highest flight by any American, and is currently still the highest altitude attained by any manned balloon flight. Catrachos (talk) 16:22, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments on Preliminary Article 
Talk:Cycling at the 2000 Summer Olympics – Men's individual road race

message: A Danish version of this article, Landevejsløbet ved de olympiske lege i sydney, was created on 30 January 2014 and now redirects here.  Here is a translation of the two paragraphs it adds to the article. Since they are unreferenced and not fully neutral, I'm placing them here for consideration.
:Jan Ullrich had a reputation for coming to races poorly prepared, especially early in the season, and therefore often had to get himself into shape during the Tour de France. However, he was in top form when he arrived at the Olympics, with the result that he won gold in the road race and silver in the road time trial. Ulrich won on a breakaway with his two trusty captains: Andreas Klöden and the later Olympic gold medallist Alexandre Vinokourov, who in 2000 were both competing for Ullrich in Team Telekom and won bronze and silver, respectively.
:In the group after the three leaders were several of the favourities, including Lance Armstrong, Danilo Di Luca, Michele Bartoli, Paolo Bettini, Axel Merckx and the best of the Danes, Frank Høj, who finished sixth. However, Lance Armstrong was later disqualified for admitted doping, the only rider to whom this happened, although almost all competitors in the first two groups were later caught doping.
Yngvadottir (talk) 17:17, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Added material in Danish version
Talk:Vectoring nozzle

message: Don't know who wrote this stub, but he/she is dead wrong.  In the well-researched "Air War South Atlantic", by Jeffery Ethell and Alfred Price, they have this to say (pg 175): "Because there was scarcely any fighter-versus-fighter combat, Sea Harrier pilots never used VIFF (thrust Vectored In Forward Flight) while engaging enemy aircraft." And later on the same page: "Once Sea Harrier pilots had enemy aircraft in sight, the usually pounced from above, closed rapidly to within missile firing range, and loosed off a Sidewinder." The Army's version of the Harrier was not used in any air to air combat during that campaign. As far as I have been able to determine, VIFF has never been used by Harriers in air-to-air combat in any conflict.  98.255.85.245 (talk) 02:05, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In addition, the two paragraphs about the use of thrust vectoring would be better at home in the thrust vectoring page.--Jean-Marc Liotier (talk) 11:56, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viffing in the Falklands 

message: The "Nozzles" section in the thrust vectoring page has a high level that I believe would have a better home in the Vectoring nozzles page. Is anyone interested in merging it to this page ?--Jean-Marc Liotier (talk) 11:59, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging the nozzles section from the thrust vectoring page 

message: The definition is incorrect and misleading since it focusses on only one of many capabilities. I have deleted it.User:Pieter1963|Pieter1963]] (talk) 01:26, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Except you have left the article without a lead definition. --ChetvornoTALK 08:42, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: definition for vectoring nozzle
Talk:Wet wing

message: I was hoping to find some history of this idea here.  Who did this first?  The Seversky SEV-3? DonPMitchell (talk) 17:46, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  History? 

message: '.. wing root bending moment caused by the lift generated by the wings in flight is decreased.'
Does anyone know why this is the case?
I understand that the wing root bending moment that is generated by the weight of the wing and thus its inertia is reduced through reducing the weight of the wing.
Thanks from Stefan  Lodidol (talk) 06:42, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I think is is because in general on a wet wing the fuel can be located closer to the wing root than with tanks, but I agree that it isn't clear in the article. - Ahunt (talk) 13:38, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  decreased wing root bending moment 

message: Hi, I think this article need a picture/diagram. I think the picture below would be a great choice, since it clearly shows the fuel carrying parts of the wing (not always easy to visualise). Not everyone agrees and my edits have been reverted. 3rd opinions welcome...  --MBiR (talk) 10:14, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: While the diagram may show a wet wing fuel cell arrangement it isn't specific and doesn't add a lot to the reader's understanding of the subject. Don't we have a better image somewhere? - Ahunt (talk) 16:38, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram
Talk:Williams F107

message: More references linking the two would be a good strat. No objections per se.--Petebutt (talk) 13:16, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The forecastinternational backgrounder is pretty explicit about the F107/F122/F415 being only variants.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 06:07, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No one ever bothered adding those variants to this article before the new articles were created, and creating redirects here from the other designations so they wouldn't show up on the missing aviation articles list. Yet somehow someone always is willing to suggest merging after someone else has done the heavy lifting. - BilCat (talk) 06:44, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

text: Never mind, and apologies for the snarkiness. Go.ahead and merge. - BilCat (talk) 12:47, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 12:27, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have worked at Williams international for over 40 years.  First, I’m not aware of an F122 engine.  The F112 is a modified version of the F107.  The f107/f112 engines are a two spindle design with the LP shaft with two turbines driving an IP fan/compressor group and an HP shaft driving a centrifugal compressor.  The LP shaft and the HP shaft spin in opposite directions.  Second, the F415 is a single shaft engine with an IP fan/compressor/turbine design.  Third, the f107-105 engine currently in production is a hybrid of the f107/f112 engines.  This engine is currently going into the an Air Force air launched missile not the Tomahawk. 65.130.173.217 (talk) 04:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Also, the F107-WR-105 has a thrust that is less than 700 lbs. The FJ33, FJ44 engines are rated at a thrust of 1300 lbs and above but are mainly used on commercial aircraft. 65.130.173.217 (talk) 04:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: As mentioned in the Merger proposal, as the F107/F122/F415 are variants of the WR19, should the article reflect the company name for the project, with specifics about variants within? Dustball72 (talk) 15:31, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of Title?
Talk:Frank Lowe (advertiser)

message: Today I was listening to "Fresh", sort of a Thelonious Monk tribute from 1975 by the American tenor sax player.  Was I ever surprised to see a later recording of the saxophonist Frank Lowe mentioned as the work of advertising agency founder Frank Lowe!Ccex 15:54, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To say the least. I guess the article needs splitting in two. I have no idea if the ad agency guy deserves a wiki page but the saxophonist certainly does. --ND 19:33, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the advertising business, an 'advertiser' means a corporate client, who employs an advertising agency  -  as reflected in the 'Incorporated Society of British Advertisers' (ISBA). Lowe was an advertising agency chairman, and should probably be designated as 'Ad agency chief' or 'Advertising tycoon'. Valetude (talk) 00:20, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertiser?
Talk:Sumner High School (St. Louis)

message: see speedy keep and alumni Victuallers (talk) 23:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shootings have happened here on campus and they should be put on the main page
On March 18, 1975, two students got in a fight and one of the students tried to shoot the other but missed and killed 16-year-old bystander Stephen Goods.https://www.abc7chicago.com/school-violence-shootings-shooting-how-many/5697522https://www.gunownersofcanada.ca/showthread.php/22936-1975-SCHOOL-SHOOTING-Brampton-tragedy-sparked-calls-for-changes-to-Canada-s-gun-lawshttps://www.google.com/books/edition/From_School_Administrator_to_School_Lead/zzbLCQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=sumner+high+school+st+louis+march+1975+shooting&pg=PA122&printsec=frontcover
On March 25, 1993, female student Lawanda Jackson shot and killed her ex boyfriend Tony Hall in a school hallway. Jackson was convicted of first-degree murder and armed criminal action and was sentenced to life without parole.https://www.newspapers.com/clip/19813079/st-louis-post-dispatch/https://www.newspapers.com/clip/17632570/st-louis-post-dispatch/https://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-xpm-1993-03-26-9303250687-story.htmlhttps://scholarly.cmich.edu/?a=d&d=CMUGR2015-91.1.178&e=-------en-10--1--txt-txIN%7ctxAU%7ctxTI--------
On October 10, 1996, 17-year-old Lamon Jones was shot and killed by 15-year-old Kembert Thomas during a fight among several students. Thomas was convicted of second-degree murder.https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/141875579/https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519244.pdfhttps://archive.org/stream/ERIC_ED519244/ERIC_ED519244_djvu.txthttp://www.readbag.com/psychceu-school-violence-savdhttps://www.docplayer.net/amp/9605532-National-school-safety-center-s-report-on-school-associated-violent-deaths-page-1-of-45.htmlhttps://www.newspapers.com/image/141747938/?terms=Kembert%20Thomas&match=1 2601:206:301:6300:3F73:D6C4:A678:A13B (talk) 02:06, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shooting incidents on school Campus
Talk:Sheffield High School, South Yorkshire

message: The present day section comes across as biased at the worst and unreferenced at the least. Statements like "the vast majority" are unhelpful. What do you consider to be the vast majority? 60%? 75%? 90%? 99%? This needs proper referencing and the style needs to be changed to take the subjectivity out. 
General notes on this article
-There aren't any references. I'll edit the article to add as many as possible. 
-The tone is off for Wikipedia. Some odd choices of trivia to put there. 
-A section with notable alumni probably wouldn't go amiss. I don't have a lot of time to spend editing this page and researching alumni but I'll add what I can. There's quite a lot of rewriting needed here.
Edits I made - changed a few typos/grammatical errors and added in that alumni section, although I don't have the information that would allow me to flesh it out much further. This article really, really needs references. At the moment it just reads like a current member of staff wrote it. I've added in tags and changed the typo of "Sherriff" (!! wtf??!) to Shireff. Ohgodiva (talk) 00:37, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''NPOV??''' 

message: The 'former pupils' category associated with this school has been nominated for renaming, along with all similar categories. Comments are invited at the categories' entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Occuli (talk) 15:22, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories for discussion: nomination of various 'Former pupils' categories
Talk:Boeing 80

message: I don't think such an airline exists, and I am considering to remove it from the list. TYelliot (talk) 21:17, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It may not exist now, but it did exist. See Robert Campbell Reeve article where it is referenced. I can add refs to this article if that is desired. Mjroots (talk) 21:18, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ref is Flying Beats Work, Chapter 4. An online mention of the airline is here. Mjroots (talk) 21:25, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monterey Peninsula Airlines 
Talk:Aggrotech

message: I suggest the page being redirected to List_of_post-industrial_music_genres_and_related_fusion_genres#Aggrotech .  This section provides a description of this type of music, without unnecessarily giving it its own article.  It also provides much more information than Industrial Music, the article that Aggrotech currently redirects to.   Sovex (talk) 00:07, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested Redirect

message: This should be redirected to the aggrotech section of the electro-industrial page, where it is most relevant. Aryder779 (talk) 02:30, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New redirect

message: Aggrotech is now covered substantially at Electro-industrial#Aggrotech, rather than at List_of_post-industrial_music_genres_and_related_fusion_genres#Aggrotech. The redirect should point there. Aryder779 (talk) 15:20, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Speedy Close Changing the target of a redirect is the job of WP:RFD Redirects for discussion and not WP:RM. --70.24.178.195 (talk) 18:06, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

text: also the new target is called Post-industrial music genres and related fusion genres. --70.24.178.195 (talk) 18:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Could the following text:
Category:Protected redirects
...please be replaced with the following text:
...so that the redirect is is put into the category via a tranclusion in an Rcat template rather than a category transclusion? Thanks! Steel1943 (talk) 06:51, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:05, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 19 September 2014
Talk:Caledonian hip hop

message: This article was mostly a direct translation from the French page. I fixed the grammar and took a look at the French Wiki's "Rap Caledonian" article, however the French version did not have any more detailed information about this sub-genre of hip-hop.  Removed Copy Edit tag as there wasn't much to edit. Lazulilasher (talk) 00:35, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

message: I think the page should be deleted unless s/o knows more about the subject...? There wasn't anything on the French wikipedia except the exact same article in French. Lazulilasher (talk) 00:36, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for deletion
Talk:How the Grinch Stole Christmas (TV special)

message: I have put in the correct release date - the IMDB was wrong, and I am now going to submit them a correction. I have verified it by going to the Time Magazine Archives.AlbertSM (talk) 01:15, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

message: I felt compelled to add a few words to the lead justifying why this is being referred to as an animated short even though no one else has ever done so in the production's 41-year history. 68.146.41.232 (talk) 14:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Animated short' descriptor
Talk:Clare Mallory

message: Not sure about this paragraph which has been in place since the article was created in 2007:
"Brenda Page was another influence on Mallory's writing. Page's 1927 school story Schoolgirl Rivals is obviously Mallory's inspirational source for Juliet Overseas. In the early chapters the similarities between the two books are particularly apparent with sentences being transposed with slight or no alteration; she was a stranger in a strange land becomes She was a new girl in a strange land; a crowd of passengers from another train swarmed across the platform becomes a little crowd of passengers from another train hurried across the platform. As the stories progress however Mallory strikes off firmly on her own taking her story to a level of excellence in characterisation and plotting that far surpasses the earlier book."
This is unsourced and looks like original research. The first quoted parallel does not read convincingly in any case as possibly both books are referring to Exodus 2:22. I'm considering removing it but will wait until others have had a chance to respond. Tacyarg (talk) 10:48, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brenda Page reference
Talk:Carolina Bermudez

message: This girl is hot...can we get some pics up or something?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.181.77.170 (talk) 11:25, 1 November 2010 (UTC)