lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Religiosity

message: Deleted what was here as it referred to the first version of this article before it was redirected then the redirection was taken off.  It did not refer to the current content or a previous version of the current content.
--exmoron 22:29, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's at nost:Religiosity/Talk on the Nostalgia Wikipedia in its proper context. Graham87 07:27, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I have been at work to switch out the term "religiosity" with the more appropriate, "religious fervor" Seriously guys, who came up with religiosity, it is very childish and immature, and it is shameful that anyone who would want to learn about the topic of religion would arrive upon a very badly titled article( which also has some grammar issues, but I can't fix everything at once) So if anyone can help me with getting a higher ranking Wikipedia staff with changing the title to something more appropriate. Also I am at work fixing the whole hyperlinking system between the religion articles in general.— Preceding unsigned comment added by C.A.Spadini (talk • contribs) 19:36, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Religiosity is a broad concept and certainly is not limited to fervor. Many religions do not have a fervor as a component there are in fact many dimensions to religions such as beliefs, bonging and behavior which are not linked to emotions. It seems you want to reduce religion to fanaticism. None of the studies here even mention "religious fervor" so why switch the whole article to misrepresent what the sources say?Huitzilopochtli1990 (talk) 22:42, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "religiosity" A Woefully Bad Title 

message: I agree with others that this is not a great article. Wherever I look online, "religiosity" is defined as "[being] excessively religious". Only here does it have a really complex, science-y and apparently hard to define definition. Prinsgezinde (talk) 19:53, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a great article

message: For example, one can accept the truthfulness of the Bible (belief dimension), but never attend a church or even belong to an organized religion (practice dimension).
How is this original research? It seems to be a statement of a fact without a citation. Is that allowed?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.156.105.27 (talk) 14:35, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Original Research"
Talk:Renewable energy

message: Should we also include the "Capacity" graph in the article somewhere? And should we consider showing all other electricity sources in the Production graph? We might consider a graph showing "all renewables" together vs. other sources (oil, coal, gas, nuclear etc. separated) to show the relative share?    talk 11:09, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You might want to look at the ~29 renewable energy charts I've uploaded, shown on my Wikimedia Commons page (expand the collapsible text). There are already some "capacity" charts in this article; maybe more charts are appropriate. —RCraig09 (talk) 17:15, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible additional charts

message: — Assignment last updated by Yl10506 (talk) 19:21, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA23 - Sect 201 - Thu

message: It's supposed to be 35.6 degrees Fahrenheit Cherrycoke5 (talk) 01:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry I cannot see that error - maybe you or someone else already fixed it. In general the answer is yes - see Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle  Chidgk1 (talk) 16:38, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello, is it okay for me to edit the conversion error under drivers and benefit section? 

message: Do you think Passive daytime radiative cooling is in scope?
Do you think hydrogen is in scope? Chidgk1 (talk) 16:41, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I think they are outside of the scope and have removed those two sections now. EMsmile (talk) 10:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope of the article? 

message: Should we excerpt more here, either from main articles or from Sustainable energy which is a featured article, for example wind power? Might make it easier to keep up to date. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I would support this suggestion. There is probably also a fair bit of content that should be moved to sub-articles. EMsmile (talk) 10:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  More excerpts? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Juniper37 (talk) 23:18, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Geographies of Energy and Sustainability

message: Solve the error in reference 3, please Graph8389 (talk) 03:51, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't see the error in ref 3? EMsmile (talk) 10:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction
Talk:Robert Stickgold

message: Possible sources of info.
see also: 
# http://www.pbs.org/safarchive/3_ask/archive/bio/73_rstickgold_bio.html
I removed him from the list of American psychiatrists since he has a PhD in biochemistry and is not a medical doctor. Doc JoeR (talk) 06:19, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ringo Starr

message: Lennon did not ask Ringo to join The Beatles, their manager Brian Epstein went round on a Tuesday to Ringo's house to ask him to join the band. Source Hunter Davies book. Plus, this info is common knowledge. Ringo said that Brian Epstein asked him to join the Beatles, https://laughingsquid.com/brian-epstein-asked-ringo-starr-to-join-the-beatles/2600:1700:5AC0:4000:2033:7762:AB77:2AC2 (talk) 23:04, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Question: What part of the article exactly are you referring to that you are requesting be changed? BlueNoise (Désorienté? It's just purple) 06:01, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe they're referring to . Aaron Liu (talk) 11:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Laughing Squid is a blog that isn't made by music experts. Aaron Liu (talk) 11:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 2 October 2022 

message: John Lennon didn't ask Ringo to join The Beatles. Brian Epstein did. See here https://laughingsquid.com/brian-epstein-asked-ringo-starr-to-join-the-beatles/ 2600:1700:5AC0:4000:5D67:E294:8C70:7E65 (talk) 04:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. The lede does not say who asked him to join.  What change are you asking for?  RudolfRed (talk) 17:28, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 May 2023 

message: The authors in the section "Musiscianship / Songwriting" and in the beginning of the whole entry skip two songs to which Starr contributed as a writer: "Free as a bird" and "Real love", both released under the name The Beatles. Alejandroflopezz (talk) 15:34, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ringo has no writing credit for "Real Love", nor does McCartney or Harrison. The section is not meant to be an exhaustive list of his credits. He is listed at Anthology 1#Track listing. Sundayclose (talk) 15:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Songwriting 

message: In the Personal life section, we have Ringo and his wife splitting their time between LA and Monte Carlo at the beginning of the paragraph about his homes. But at the end of the paragraph their time is divided between LA and London. Boscaswell talk 10:23, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: But he sold the Cranleigh property 12 years ago? So they can't be spending any time there any more? The supporting source is 20 years old. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home - conflict of information in the article
Talk:Rn (newsreader)

message: Here is an example where capitalizing the title is silly.  It is not at all commonplace to capitalise UNIX shell commands as then they won't work.  --drj
----
Yes, but if you don't capitalize it, you can't link to it.  It's a software feature/bug. --LMS
----
Yes I know, that's why I mentioned it.  It's a bug in this case, IMO.  I'm sure we can live with it.  --drj
----
Early versions of 'rn' accessed the Usenet news directly from the server it ran on.
: This is not exactly a distinction.  Every news reader accessed the spool directly before this new-fangled interweb thing got started.  rn is notable because it was the first screen-oriented news reader, and its user interface is still a model today.  readnews, the original news reader, was line-oriented.  (I'm old enough to remember both.)  There was also vn, which was also screen-oriented and roughly contemporaneous with rn, which had a clunkier (more gopher-like as I recall) user interface that's similar in concept to many modern mail clients.  18.24.0.120 07:24, 14 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I've now rewritten the main article to clearly spell out what made rn important any what happened to it.  18.24.0.120 06:28, 18 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wayne Davison. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 02:21, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wayne Davison listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Regular expression

message: The paragraph waits until the end to tell what normalization is, when it should be put in easy words at the beginning of the text.
I tried to understand the meaning of Normalization in the context of RegEx.
But when I read the paragraph at Regular_expression#Unicode at the point Normalization it was telling me about Unicode and some Typewriter history just to end with the final words [...] is normalization.
Better writing style would be: Normalization means something something. And then go into examples and history lessons. GavriilaDmitriev (talk • they/them) 03:10, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad writing style in Unicode>Normalization 

message: The text on the main page says this: "Every regular expression can be written solely in terms of the Kleene star and set unions over finite words." I think concatenation is also needed; if you have only Kleene star and unions over finite sets of words, you cannot make {1} conc {0}* (sets of words starting with 1 followed by arbitrarily many zeroes). 137.132.217.132 (talk) 09:07, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perhaps an error 

message: Both "look-ahead" and "lookahead" are used in the Regular_expression#Assertions section of the page.
I imagine "look-ahead" is incorrect, but I will leave it up to someone else to either clarify that both are correct or remove the incorrect one. Llamasaylol (talk) 17:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "look-ahead" or "lookahead"
Talk:Richard Feynman

message: New subject editors are once again (and understandably) attempting to categorize Feynman under various Judaism categories, but these changes are being reverted. This issue has been discussed multiple times, with the consensus being that Feynman specifically did not wish to be categorized under any religion. If your argument is that religious rules should override personal declarations, then as an editor, you must decide which religious rules to follow. Multiple religious groups now claim Feynman as exclusively their own. For instance, according to the rules of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Feynman was converted to Mormonism in 1990, and thus he is no longer considered Jewish. Please consider that if Wikipedia's policy were to prioritize religious rules over an individual's own declaration of their religious affiliation, it would create numerous complications. The standing consensus to this point has been to respect Feynman's wishes and not assign him to any religious categories. Lexlex (talk) 13:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Feynman's Religion

message: In the preface to QED: A strange theory of light and matter, it's specifically distuinguished from *just* a textbook or collection of notes and I think should belong in the popular works section. I'm new to wiki editing and I'm not sure, so what do you think? Noahkahn (talk) 12:42, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reclassifying QED under popular works?
Talk:Race (human categorization)

message: Of these two sentences "Modern science regards race as a social construct, an identity which is assigned based on rules made by society. While partly based on physical similarities within groups, race does not have an inherent physical or biological meaning."  Only the second is true, as no geneticist would ever agree that heritable cultural traits are a social construction with no biological basis. Please, revise. 2003:A:A0B:4100:44C3:A7AE:28C0:71E5 (talk) 21:08, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the view of the scientific mainstream. We're not going to delete it because an anonymous editor just asks. MrOllie (talk) 21:14, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

text: And no geneticist or anthropologist would agree there is any such thing as "heritable cultural traits". The anonymous commenter clearly does not actually understand what culture means.  I think they probably meant "phenotypic traits that are heritable within a localized human population (which often but not necessarily loosely coincides with an ethnic group), including in descendants who move to another locality", or something like that, but this doesn't prove the existence of "biological races", only the fact that particular haplogroups exist, are heritable, were historically and to a limited extent still are geographically separated, and have effects on the phenotypic aspects controlled by the genes common to the haplogroup. But none of that has the slightest thing to do with cultures (and actually disproves "races", because we know from haplogroup divergence calculations that a particular haplogroup can sweep across a wide area in comparatively few generations while others remain unchanged in the same population, with a great deal of continuity even back to the Neolithic). The anon could save some cognitive dissonance by reading WP:R&E, especially the sections 'The "race" illusion' and 'Genes don't work the way the average person thinks they do'.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  09:55, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revise intro 

message: "do not support notion of genetically defined races" should be "support _the_ notion"? WilbaAtWikipedia (talk) 03:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep! Now fixed. Thanks! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:04, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing "the"? 

message: The article claims there’s a consensus race is social construct, and links to a few statements. However the concept is used all the time in medicine. It seems to me that the references used to support this claim are just one point of view. Mercatorial (talk) 05:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict between sources and practice
Talk:Rpm

message: I move this section from the rpm page:
:The theory of relativity sets limits to rotational speed for an object of a certain diameter.  When the rotational speed or diameter increases, a point on the perimeter will move faster, but cannot move faster than the speed of light.  If the rotational center is made to move faster, the rotating object will deform so that the perimeter moves at its allowed speed.  This effect can be noted on computer hard disks.
The last sentence: "This effect can be noted on computer hard disks" must be wrong. If a hard disk is rotating with 10000 rpm, then the diameter of the disk need to be several hundred kilometer for the velocity of the perimeter to approach the speed of light. Or am I wrong? --css
:Hmm.  A 3.5 inch disk spinning at 10,000 RPM would be moving about 104MPH at the edge.  So there's no danger of exceeding the speed of light.  However, there might be some small relativistic effect even at that low speed...?  I couldn't find any info on this.  More likely, the issue is simply one of material deformation at high speeds.  I'd be fascinated if it was the former, though. --D
----
I would have thought that the equivalent SI unit to rpm would be the Hz, since we are dealing in revolutions or rotations or cycles per unit time. The non-SI equivalent of rad/sec would surely be degree / sec or similar angular unit / time unit ?     Ian Cairns 17:16, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: First - rotational speed (r/min or 1/min or r/s or 1/s) and angular speed (rad/s or deg/s) have been confused. They are separate quantities and have different units. Second - I think 1/s (1/min) is more often used as unit of rotational speed than Hz. Hz is more often used for oscillating phenomena. Aulis Eskola 20:19, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Register

message: You know, the modern realist american painter? He deserves an entry in Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.243.218.7 (talk • contribs) 6 January 2006
:Other people add redlinks to disambiguation pages, but I don't, especially for a human being because he would often be called "John Register" or "Mr. Register" rather than "Register". I'm not sure if he's well known enough, but if he is then I think he should have his own article first. Art LaPella 20:00, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He is well known mate, trust me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.124.119.88 (talk • contribs) 8 January 2006
This was resolved by linking to Register (surname), done for the first time on 2010-08-18. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 10:49, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about John Register 

message: This DAB currently has several dozen incoming links from article space, mostly via redirects. The largest proportion of these are links to Register (linguistics), which was a parenthetical disambiguation until it was redirected here on 22 January 2013. Most of the pages linking there probably should be changed to Register (sociolinguistics), but a few may need to go to Register (phonology). Any help in changing these and other incoming links to the proper destination would be appreciated. Cnilep (talk) 02:46, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incoming links 

message: Quoting: "Wikipedia® is a registered", not the actual page title.
201.190.18.245 (talk) 03:03, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link from Google has weird title 

message: Rheisonlaurio (talk) 00:57, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Sakura CarteletTalk 01:35, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 September 2018
Talk:Homosexuality and religion

message: Generally all religions traditionally view what we would consider LGBTQ+ today as something undesirable. Sure, there are progressive sects and denominations, but the traditional view of nearly every religion on Earth regards LGBTQ+ as something negative and even sinful. 2601:98A:400:8910:992D:A09C:979B:6574 (talk) 06:50, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That's just wrong. The majority of religions don't view homosexuality as negative. Hinduism, Buddhism, Hellenic Polytheism, Paganism, Humanism, Taoism and many more don't. It's almost exclusively Abrahamic religions that are so prejudiced.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MianMianBaoBao (talk • contribs) 01:05, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I feel like Dharmic Religions have pretty strong traditional segments which are against Homosexuality, and it's largely omitted. For example, the Hindu section does mention opposition to Homosexuality, but barely touches on it, spending more time talking about progressive segments in favor of it. 71.129.228.139 (talk) 04:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traditional religions all condemn LGBTQ+ 

message: would it be Wikipedia:UNDUE to mention Falun Gong's views on Homosexuality?
link here directly to their views on homosexuality
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teachings_of_Falun_Gong#Controversies 98.59.80.64 (talk) 04:35, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  falun gong views on homosexuality 

message: — Assignment last updated by ACHorwitz (talk) 20:20, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture 320-01
Talk:Rock Bridge High School

message: The Majority of the article was straight from the Columbia Public Schools student handbook for secondary schools. A shortend version of the handbook, containing the entire part copied here can be found at the Rock Bridge High School Website on the menu, under studen handbook. Grey_Wanderer 20:24, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy Rights Violation

message: A high school athletics page, should contain history of the program, and of past championships and awards won.  It should not be a place to discuss the likely outcome of the current season, or a commentary of the next game.  It could be used to list current members or starters of a team, but to discuss the outcomes of the current season, is by nature POV (Point of View) and just asks to be vandalised. Grey Wanderer 21:29, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Athletics

message: I’ve created the :Category:Rock Bridge High School alumni for use on article about alumni of the school. If you add someone to the list please make sure they are also in this category. Grey Wanderer (talk) 08:40, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Alumni category

message: I have never tried to edit Wikipedia, but I'd like to suggest an edit. The openstreetmap currently points to Brentwood High School in St. Louis and should be fixed.
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andvan90 (talk • contribs) 07:29, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for pointing this out. The map is being generated from coordinates in Wikidata. I'll take a look at them. —C.Fred (talk) 12:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

text: Coordinates are fixed. Again, thank you! —C.Fred (talk) 12:53, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The open street map is wrong
Talk:Red

message: We need to be moving away from religion as a way to explain concepts. Suggest we remove the picture as inappropriate. 89.240.48.37 (talk) 20:18, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to change the top image collection  

message: Add that red is associated with hunger 92.249.247.166 (talk) 16:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request

message: In section 'Symbolism', subheading 'Warning and danger' there is an image of a fire danger chart. In the caption beneath it please change the word 'severe' to 'extreme'. Paper.to.pen (talk) 07:10, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Jamedeus (talk) 07:43, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 March 2024 

message: Change "some Hindu women put a stripe of sindoor in their hair to show they are married" to "some Hindu women put a stripe of sindoor along their hair parting to show they are married" 151.210.166.52 (talk) 06:49, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Charliehdb (talk) 10:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 May 2024