lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Communist Party of Portugal (Marxist–Leninist) (1974)

message: These two articles are so wrong that only with a merge they can be made in something valid.
From the Communist Party of Portugal (Marxist-Leninist) article:
"The Communist Party of Portugal (Marxist-Leninist) (in Portuguese: 'Partido Comunista de Portugal (Marxista-Leninista)') was a political party in Portugal. Also known as the 'Mendes faction of PCP(M-L)'."
Both the 'Mendes' and the 'Vilar' factions claimed to be the true "PCP(M-L)"; and that was the 'Vilar' faction that was legally registred as "PCP(M-L)".
"In 1974 a splinter-group broke away from the party, forming the Popular Unity Party."
The PUP was not a splinter-group from the 'Mendes faction of PCP(M-L)'; it was the name that these faction adopted when it was legally registred.
"At the time of the 1976 elections PCP(M-L) launched the slogan "For Independence, For Democracy, For Social Progress! - Vote for the lists presented by PCP(m-l)!" (Pela independência pela democracia, pelo progresso social! - vota nas listas apresentadas pelo PCP (m-l)!)"
"That" PCP(M-L) was the 'Vilar faction', not the 'Mendes faction'.
From the Communist Party of Portugal (Marxist–Leninist) (1974) article:
"On November 17, 1974, Vilar's party launched the Worker-Peasant Alliance (AOC). The party took part in elections through AOC, since the name PCP(M-L) was taken by their adversaries."
No. Both the names AOC and PCP(M-L) where  taken by 'Vilar faction' (the 'Mendes faction' used the names PUP and "Comité Marxista-Leninista Português"); the reason why it was two different names was because the PCP(M-L) was supposed to be the "vanguard party" and AOC the "mass front".
Because the history of 'Mendes faction' and of 'Vilar faction' is so confused in these two articles, I think that, for now, the better is a merge between the two (and, eventually, a new splint in different lines).--194.38.144.2 (talk) 15:02, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Swiftcover

message: I've added this as its one of several UK insurance providers missing from this category section. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Insurance_companies_of_the_United_Kingdom
Jelsden 15:41, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

message: A number of the editors only contribute to this page, which gives me the impression that it is being professionally managed. References to their banned ad has been removed twice, even though it is properly sourced. I will put it back again, and if it is removed again, will take it further. Hyper3 (talk) 14:43, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Professionally managed

message: I think we can  remove the wikify and newsrelease boxes. Anyone disagree? Hyper3 (talk) 12:30, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove boxes

message: Somebody keeps removing a relevant link the purpose of which is to clearly provide an independent review of the Swiftcover website. The reason given is they believe the link to constitute spam. I would be interested to hear how this spurious conclusion was reached.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by James Christian Read (talk • contribs) 19:18, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of relevant link

message: Hi there - I work with swiftcover.com and wanted to suggest an addition to bring the page up to date. Iggy Pop no longer fronts the campaign: see  http://www.swiftcover.com/about/press/swiftbrother-campaign/  and  http://www.marketingweek.co.uk/swiftcover-drops-iggy-pop/3032724.article for further information. Is it appropriate to add this information in? Happy to go ahead and do it myself or step back and let someone else do it. Let me know. Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.27.45.112 (talk) 19:40, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Marketing
Talk:Relativity and quantum mechanics

message: The remark about spinning a particle is just wrong.  One does not spin a particle.  Spin simply is a property that particles have.  It is not even spin in the sense that we normally consider (e.g., a baseball or a soccer ball); it is so called because the equation describing the property is practically identical to the equation describing the angular momentum of a spinning ball.  All subatomic particles have a characteristic spin value, either an integer or a half-integer (1/2, 3/2 and so on).  Particles which are entangled with respect to spin, will exhibit correlations (e.g., the direction of one may be "up" and the direcion of the other will be "down") during a given pair of measurements.  After those measurements are done, nothing further can be said about the spin of those particles, and subsequent measurements in different directions (e.g. "left" and "right") will show no correlation whatsoever.  Now, I am just a physics amateur; somebody who really knows this, please write a correct description of this phenomenon. --Swwright 20:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article "Relativity and quantum mechanics" now re-directs to Quantum gravity.  The above comment is therefore now irrelevant. — SWWrightTalk 22:39, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Particle Spin

message: It is simply seriously flawed, and not much of it is correct. Besides, the article Quantum gravity already exists, is as far as i can tell (not very far, that is), accurate, and a lot of fun to read! So why bother about this one? - Saibod 12:15, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: see also Stevertigo. - Saibod 22:40, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  delete this article!
Talk:Jiří Čunek

message: I removed the POV tag from the article as there had not been any discussion regarding it. If adding it again please specify your objections on this talk page. – Yarp 15:50, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag 
Talk:IAccessible2

message: This is supposed to be part of a new category of Accessibility APIs. Then in "List of screen readers", or in pages about particular applications, compatibility with a given API can be specified, and readers can visit the page to learn about that particular API. I've also created an article for "Microsoft UI Automation" as information about UIA really doesn't belong in "Microsoft Active Accessibility". Snce, as far as I understand, it's a completely new API with a different licence and intended to be cross-platform, people wouldn't necessarily search for MSAA to find out about it. If we'd prefer one big fat article, a possible alternative would be to create a single article called "Accessibility API" (in the "Assistive Technology" category) and discuss the various minor/new APIs (IAccessible2, UIA, Java Access Bridge, possibly the proposed QT Bridge) under headings there, with links out to AT-SPI and MSAA. Would that be preferable? I didn't go that route initially because I can't think of much useful to say about the APIs as a group.
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis 15:52, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moving improper source reference here incase someone else can make good use of it. IBM press release: "IBM Helps Disabled Users Get More From Assistive Technology, on More Computer Platforms. Accessed 2007-02-06. NipokNek 13:32, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Here's another reference moved off the Article. See Rich Schwerdtfeger's blog: "Project Missouri and IBM's donation of IAccessible2 to the Free Standards Group" (2006-12-14), accessed 2007-02-06; and Elizabeth Montalbano, " IBM project aims to help blind use ODF applications", Infoworld (2006-11-03), accessed 2007-02-06. NipokNek 14:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I'll try and help out as I can as far as making it all nice and pretty, but I'm no expert on this subject. Feel free to revert anything I may do that changes the proper meaning of the text. NipokNek 21:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Tiger! Tiger! (Kipling short story)

message: The following was the only reference in this article, and it appears to be broken so I removed it. It was placed by itself at the very top of the article, so there was no indication of what it was intended to relate to. If somebody knows a reliable reference to replace it, or any other references to support this article, please add them in!
:http://firstsearch.oclc.org.vortex3.uco.edu:2050/WebZ/FSFETCH?fetchtype=fullrecord:sessionid=fsapp2-35613-hudcx51k-2hxg55:entitypagenum=26:0:recno=11:resultset=9:format=FI:next=html/record.html:bad=error/badfetch.html:entitytoprecno=11:entitycurrecno=11:numrecs=1
--Gronk Oz (talk) 08:51, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link to Chambers Library at the University of Central Oklahoma
Talk:Tigerfibel

message: I think we should get a picture of the Tigerfibel.--ItsJodo 16:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: The last word isn't really accurate, it's chosen more to try and rhyme with "approved", it means more like "will be taken care of" (meaning killed or wiped out). Historian932 (talk) 19:03, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translated lines
Talk:To Be the Man

message: Was Ric Flair's "To Be the Man" book released as a autobiographical DVD? If it's a yes then I'll edit the article straight away. If it's a no then I'll leave it alone. Kyrios320 (talk) 12:29, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just wanna know
Talk:To Light a Candle

message: This article was tagged for a copy edit.  After reviewing the article, I've determined the article is not ready for a copy edit, because it needs to be substantially rewritten to comply with WP:MOSFICTION etc.  The plot section needs to be cut way down, and discussion of the work in a real-world context needs to be added.  The article has been tagged with the appropriate maintenance banners, and the copyedit tag has been removed.  After the article has been rewritten, please feel free to re-add the  tag. —Darkwind (talk) 16:37, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedit declined
Talk:To the Finland Station

message: This is one of the worst entries I've yet seen of an important book on Wiki. Poorly laid out and written, missing info on it's initial failure but subsequent success. Has no thoughts from critics. Doesn't even mention Wilson's knowledge of what was actually happening within the USSR before the book's completion, but that he went ahead and published a pro-Soviet work anyway....apologizing in a later 1971 edition. 
This page needs major improvements, yet considering how old the Wiki project is already, I guess Wilson's status as an important writer has dwindled since the entry remains in such bad shape.
:Removed TRIVIA reference to Pet Shop Boys, as it's utterly irrelevent to subject at hand.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.249.147.179 (talk) 16:17, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Spar Aerospace

message: * I think that the page should be moved from Spar Aerospace to SPAR Aerospace and replaced with a redirect -- the company's name in all published literature (and on the L-3 SPAR Aerospace website) is listed as SPAR, since, as the article states, SPAR is an acronym. ContivityGoddess 15:59, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Tongdian

message: Please excuse me for my redundant article on the "T'ung tien". I went looking for an existent article and I could not find one; in fact there weren't even any articles on the Books of Tang. I wish I'd known about this article at the time.
I have redirected that over here, and I have edited my links in the Tang sites to point here too. I have also merged some verbiage into this article, and I have performed some reorganisation.
--Zimriel 04:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Apologies
Talk:Tools for Thought

message: This article ought to be about the book Tools For Thought by the British scientist C. H. Waddington, and not merely a more recent book of the same name by some other guy. 92.3.77.143 (talk) 12:31, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tools For Thought, C. H. Waddington, 1977
Talk:Peter Butt

message: Kareneski inserted the text "made by members of the nuclear establishment" into the sentence "The complaint was rejected although the panel did find that the documentary was not balanced." This very much smacks of poisoning the well: suggesting that there was something dastardly about about even raising the complaint, because of course that weasly nuclear establishment would do nothing but lie. In fact, the complaint was raised by one person (Dr. Tony Woods), not "members". And while Dr. Woods is a qualified nuclear engineer and a former engineering manager at ANSTO, he is very far from being a member of the "nuclear establishment" (which hardly even exists in Australia.) Rather, he has not worked there for years and is now a frequent and strong critic of ANSTO, and widely and favourably quoted by environmental activists.
I also added the word "alleged" to Kareneski's parenthetical "about Australia's attempts to acquire nuclear weapons". Allegations that Australia attempted to acquire a nuclear arsenal are very controversial, and citing them without a qualifier such as "alleged" are therefore biased. -- Securiger (talk) 06:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poisoning the well
Talk:Touched with Fire (book)

message: do not move Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:33, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Touched with Fire → Touched with Fire: Manic-Depressive Illness and the Artistic Temperament —
*:Touched with Fire →  — Full name; apparently, this is blacklisted? — Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:38, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move?
Talk:Cornwall (UK Parliament constituency)

message: The WP article on Walter Raleigh does not mention his election for Cornwall. Vernon White . . . Talk  21:31, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The New DNB says:
For the time being both Ralegh and his wife were banished from court—the ban on Ralegh was not lifted until 1597—but he was elected a burgess of Mitchell, Cornwall, in the parliament of 1593. He had been knight of the shire for Devon in the 1580s, and this borough seat was distinctly less exalted. Nevertheless, it was at least a stepping-stone back to favour, and in the next two parliaments he was returned for county seats: Dorset in 1597 and Cornwall in 1601. He was unique in Elizabeth's reign in sitting for three counties, a keen parliament man, actively concerned with borough patronage and with the business of the House of Commons.
DuncanHill (talk) 21:39, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hope you can add a section to Sir Walter's WP article on his Parliamentary service. Best wishes Vernon White . . . Talk  21:57, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Tis done! DuncanHill (talk) 22:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1601: Walter Raleigh 

message: The WP article on Edward William Wynne Pendarves does not mention his election for the county Cornwall 1826-1831. Vernon White . . . Talk  22:25, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The West Briton obit in the references there does . DuncanHill (talk) 22:31, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edward William Wynne Pendarves 
Talk:Toward Soviet America

message: What was their agenda? Zezen (talk) 18:19, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Toward Soviet America was written in the context of the 1932 Presidential election, in which William Z. Foster (the book's author) ran for President. So it was in some sense campaign literature; its "agenda" was to convince people to vote for Communist candidates and to support or join the Communist Party. --Ismail (talk) 15:32, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Details?
Talk:Trevenson

message: The grid reference and coordinates seem to belong to the campus at Penryn rather than Trevenson itself. The red dot is nowhere near Redruth.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 19:55, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grid reference
Talk:Tracks (novel)

message: Hi!  I am a graduate student at Indiana University's School of Library and Information Science, located at the IUPUI campus in Indianapolis.  I have developed this article for a class on adult reader's advisory.  This is my first article.  Please be aware, this page was formerly a redirect to Louise Erdrich.  I originally developed the article in my sandbox, but encountered some difficulty moving it out into Wikipedia because this page already existed.  Unfortunately, I have been unsuccessful in the past several weeks with getting the help I need to properly move my article.  At this point, I have removed the redirect and copied/pasted my article in small chunks onto the present page.  I am aware that this practice is generally discouraged, but I wasn't sure what else to do - and with semester deadlines fast approaching, my grade was on the line.  Please see my user sandbox for a complete revision history of the article.Kalorton (talk) 14:49, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Development

message: How the religion is présent in this novel 154.0.27.234 (talk) 22:50, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The religion in L.E.s track
Talk:Khalif Barnes

message: Is there any proof that he was born in San Diego city limits and not outside city limits, beacuse I believe he lived outside city limits. -ChristopherMannMcKay 16:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:ABX test

message: Why merge this?  ABX tests can be done on entities other than codecs.
166.34.148.192 16:08, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

message: The ABX test is far more general than this article implies.  Please see this:  .  Alfred Centauri 14:26, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Mostly fixed, IMHO. Some more info would be much welcome.. :) --Kjoonlee 18:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ABX history 

message: Hi, I think the current wording is slightly misleading, because ABX tests don't prove transparency; ABX tests prove (or fail to prove) a perceivable difference. This is very different from a difference not existing, since you can fail to prove an existing difference.... --Kjoonlee 18:34, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording
Talk:Treason by the Book

message: It's ridiculous to say this article cites no sources, because it is a summary of a book, ergo, the book is the source for all the assertions. The real question is: is a book summary a legitimate entry? I would say no. The article should be focussed on the plot against the emperor, and then rewritten using  not just Spence, but other sources as well. If the summary writer doesn't feel like undertaking the work, then delete the entry.  
Theonemacduff (talk) 00:02, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The book merits its own article provided there have been non-trivial reviews. There are quite a few. Perspicaris (talk) 22:40, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  absurd 
Talk:Trends (short story)

message: The section on the story's genesis says "The story had its genesis in research Asimov was conducting on behalf of an academic writing a book on social resistance to technological change."
From the book "The Early Asimov" (1972) Asimov writes "[...] I applied for and received a National Youth Administration (NYA) job designed to help me through college. I received fifteen dollars a month [...] for a few hours of typing. The typing I did was for a sociologist who was writing a book on the subject of social resistance to technological change."
Thus, Asimov was not conducting research, but rather, typing up someone else's research, according to the account Asimov relates in "The Early Asimov".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snapdragon630 (talk • contribs) 23:12, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification of story genesis: typist not researcher
Talk:Tuatha'an

message: Could people please stop romantically blending who the Tuatha'an are with Irish cultures?
The Tuatha'an and the Pavees have very little in common, other than the fact that they are itinerant people. The Pavees were not unique in being tinkers. They are not unique in singing around camp fires.
It is more accurate to say that the Tuatha'an are based on a cultural homogenisation of itinerant peoples from around the world.
Secondly, "Tuatha'an" and "Tuatha de Dannan", I mean really. There's no connection between the two.
One means something akin to "The People/Community/Land" or "The Second People/Community/Land badly" badly translated into Irish using an Irish idiosyncratic word like "Tuatha".
Tuatha de Dannan means "The People/Community/Land of Annan".
Just because they both have the same word at the start doesn't mean one came from the other, it's a bit ignorant to assume they do, in fact, much like claiming that "The Wheel of Time" gets its name from "The Wheel of Fortune" because they both have the word wheel in it.
Akari no ryu (talk) 20:46, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irish stuff
Talk:Tuesday (book)

message: I question the interpretation that the dog "joined their adventure". I think they spooked the dog, which ran away. (They'd spook me!) ----  Robina Fox (talk) 15:54, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The dog 

message: should there be a section on here about this books current use in the UK autism+adhd test? i'm not entirely sure how standardised its usage is, but i know from personal and anecdotal evidence that it's been used by multiple physicians at least. Worth further research? 2A00:23C6:A014:6301:9016:A89C:2BF6:A836 (talk) 13:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autism
Talk:Mapping cylinder

message: a minor point: "no two points (x,t) in X x I equivalent" is not correct if f is not injective. Thus we need a reformulation of the equivalence relation. - Saibot2 16:19, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not correct 

message: Shouldn't we have:
:([t,x],s) \mapsto [(1-s)\cdot t,x], (y, s) \mapsto y 
Or does this not matter/have I got something wrong? 2404:4408:4A1A:EE00:9CD:330C:402D:FD82 (talk) 20:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deformation Retraction R
Talk:Twenty Five Years of an Artist

message: the link mentioned for the references 1 + 4 is broken. apparently, the page does not exist any longer.
96.63.2.100 (talk) 12:25, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed them accordingly. Freikorp (talk) 09:24, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: broken links
Talk:Indian River Lagoon Scenic Highway

message: Is Pre-1945 Florida State Road 252 (a/k/a the Jungle Trail) part of this or near this? Want to know so as to see if it can be added to this article. --Ebyabe 16:31, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jungle Trail 

message: Propose: Merge County Road 402 (Brevard County, Florida) & County Road 515 (Brevard County, Florida) into the article as per the CRs they are part of this Scenic Highway. And it kills a stub. --Admrboltz (talk) 04:12, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Stasia Czernicki

message: PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS ARTICLE!!!!!!
I just ran across this article while Googling the family name and was totally surprised! I am one of Stasia's sons and assure you that there is a lot of reference material (newspaper articles, television show records, magazine articles, candlepin bowling association records, etc.) that should support her inclusion as a notable Wikipedia article.
I need to get up to speed on editing, formatting, etc. and will then edit the article adding a lot of interesting information.
I hope this post will keep you from deleting the article on Stasia Czernicki long enough to allow me to get the editing done.
Thanks,  CAPT Cz 16:20, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the above - a little bit of research found some glowing information about the subject.  PKT 13:28, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Two Concepts of Liberty

message: The document "TLDOC: Berlin's two concepts of liberty" has gone 404, as of 2009-01-06 -- 58.187.23.93 (talk) 11:34, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  404 link 

message: If there's going to be an "rhetorical abuse of positive liberty" section, then surely considerations of balance indicate that there should be a "rhetorical abuse of negative liberty" section.  Moreover rhetorical abuses of negative liberty are arguably much more relevant in the current political climate, regardless of whether or not "positive liberty" was abused in the 20th century...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.144.107.159 (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Abuse" of concepts of liberty 

message: The introduction includes Berlin's definition of negative liberty, but his definition of positive liberty should included in the introduction too. 86.27.249.220 (talk) 23:03, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Positive liberty should be defined in the introduction