lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mark Oakley

message: *This proposal was made by another user on the basis of naming policu. I support it, despite the existence of another Mark Oakley at Mark Oakley (disambiguation). This article should not be here; presumably its subject will someday cease to be an archdeacon. If the comic book writer gets an article separate from his book, we can dab them then. Septentrionalis 17:09, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On the Walsall page, Mark Oakley is stated as being born in Pleck.  But his personal page gives place of birth as Shrewsbury.    Cadpah (talk) 14:51, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark Oakley 
Talk:Rodney Street, Liverpool

message: I whizzed through quite a few articles on Liverpool streets earlier today, adding links for the Paradise St article, Like that one, I was astonished at how poor a lot of the content was but I was only skimming stuff. Perhaps there is nothing more to say but in this article, among other issues, it made an unsourced claim that Rodney St is known as the Harley Street of the North. It may well be but I removed it because (a) it was not sourced and (b) who knows it as that? In my edit summary I noted that John Street in Manchester has a similar set-up of posh private consulting rooms in Georgian era houses and I know some people have referred to it as being akin to Harley Street, so the chances are that the Rodney Street version is a local term, not something disseminated more widely.
I really don't care - I live in both cities, as well as somewhere else - except from the perspective of our policies and guidelines. In this case, WP:V and WP:NPOV would seem to apply. There are plenty of ways to phrase things to avoid NPOV issues but first we need to see what the sources say. And I do mean sources, not source. - Sitush (talk) 15:54, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harley Street of the North 

message: We prefer prose to lists. Those people who are mentioned in the section on buildings - Chambre, Gladstone etc - should not also be in the list. It isn't as if this is a massive, complex article, so the reader should not need to be reminded. - Sitush (talk) 18:39, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists and prose 

message: There are a lot of listed buildings, not all of which are what the ordinary person would call a building, eg: the Mackenzie Monument, but try as I might I cannot get to the 60+ figure. I think the solution may to be, er, list them. Since UK listed buildings are inherently notable, they all should or could have standalone articles. - Sitush (talk) 03:30, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Over 60 Grade II listed buildings? 

message: Please do not use the Good News Liverpool website as a source in this article. For example, their article of 2016 is pretty much a copy of how ours looked in 2015, together with various linked bio articles. I suspect GNL is not reliable for anything but certainly in this case it is a mirror. - Sitush (talk) 03:48, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not use Good News Liverpool
Talk:Gun on Ice Planet Zero

message: Can you say "Incredibly blatant rip-off of the The Guns of Navarone?" Yep. Fan-1967 17:20, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to mention The Dirty Dozen. Put it in the article!. Ellsworth 22:25, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Young Marvelman

message: REVISION NOTICE - APRIL 2010
This article will shortly undergo a major revision to match the Marvelman revision currently underway. It will include the standard 'publication history' section and 'fictional character biography'. Any comments, views and suggestions always welcome, here or on my talk page. Thanks Archiveangel (talk) 12:29, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just a preliminary notice, I'll be proposing changing this article to Young Marvelman closer to the time of revision. Rationale: the character was called Young Marvelman in the original, longest, run, plus the whole Marvelman/Miracleman business is now solved with Marvel Comics having bought the rights to the characters in 2009 and reverting to Marvelman. Archiveangel (talk) 12:53, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Name Change 

message: In Nostalgia, Anglo lists "Roy Castle" as one of the YM artists at Gower Street. That can't be THE Roy Castle, can it? BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 21:06, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Roy Castle"
Talk:Shandaken, New York

message: I'm thinking that the Big indian, new york article doesn't really merit a page by itself. Any suggestions or objections to the merge? Just as a note, the Belleayre ski center article may be affected by this. fintler (talk) 18:14, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: For starters, it looks like the Big Indian article needs to decide whether it's about Big Indian or Bearsville, or at least to explain the relationship.  Other than that, I see no obvious reason the Bearsville/Big Indian article can't stand on its own-- there's probably a lot more history to the place that could be added.  And there are plenty of precedents for very short articles on very small places.  -- Mwanner | Talk 19:47, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Erm, I might have to retract the above-- I have never seen a hamlet with so little info online.  So sure, I'd support a merge.  If anyone comes up with a decent amount of info on the place, they could always change the redirect to an article. -- Mwanner | Talk 22:18, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: On third thought (having cleaned the thing up a bit) it occurs to me that what is there is a respectable stub that could be expanded by adding hiking info for the area-- there are a bunch of mountains nearby; see  for example. True, it could be dealt with in the Shandaken article too... -- Mwanner | Talk 22:32, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been determined through consensus that all verifiable locations are inherently notable, and warrant an article. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 03:10, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Tracer (DC Comics)

message: Did THE Tracer, or a robot Tracer die in issue 3 (of 6) of DC Countdown Presents Lord Havok and the Extremists (Feb 08)? .... or did he die?  You never can tell with a lot of these comics... especially with the infinite earths that DC is jumping around in.  - Antmusic (talk) 16:42, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did THE Tracer, or a robot Tracer die in issue 3... or
Talk:Inle Lake

message: Should a sentence about the Jumping Cats monastery be included in this article?
please see this image: http://people.tribe.net/jewelz/photos/7d737247-2278-4171-a51e-4771c91a0879
thank you Minako-Chan* 00:24, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I will get on it. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 05:15, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jumping Cats Monastery 

message: I'd like to see a citation regarding the debate over the morality of visiting Inle Lake and spending money there.
NonsuchDan (talk) 23:54, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, this comment is nearly ten years old. Anyway, a juistification to visit Myanmar even in the days of the dictators wasa that they try to isolate their population, and by traveling there as a tourist you prohibit that. Rbakels (talk) 15:18, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political situation 

message: We could use a map in this article, please. Cheers, Pim Rijkee (talk) 10:01, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Took a map from OpenStreetMap.org and indicated the location of the lake, but it isn't a good map at all. We need a clear map of both the location of the lake in Myanmar and a topographic map of the lake itself. Anyone? Pim Rijkee (talk) 12:59, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: The surface area can be measured. No reason to "estimate". Intended is probably to say that the surface is about 116 km2. Which is even redundant: no one would think the surface is 116.000000000000000 km2. Rbakels (talk) 15:22, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Estimated surface area"
Talk:Wicken Fen

message: Parts of this seem to be copy and pasted from the official Wicken Fen site. I'm sure they don't mind but we're still breaching copyright.--Santahul 17:29, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A note

message: The Wicken Fen Vision website no longer seems to exist at the URL I bookmarked some years ago.
http://www.wicken.org.uk/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.184.49.32 (talk) 23:11, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wicken Fen Vision website 

message: This phrase jumped out at me "it is almost impossible to imagine how it must once have all looked"- this strikes me as more poetical than factual, so I'd suggest the article might need editing to focus on a more encyclopaedia style entry? thanks --mgaved (talk) 08:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have deleted, but more changes needed. Dudley Miles (talk) 08:40, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A bit poetic- change to factual?
Talk:Henrietta Street, Dublin

message: I added a few  references  as I was passing the article and expanded the early history of the street by a few lines. There are (more than) enough sources out there to develop the article - the Georgian era expansion of Dublin is amply recorded. I was thinking that sections on the early history (say up to 1800) and either one or two sections on the decline of the street post Act of Union through to the 20th Century and  the recent restoration work  would be appropriate.
I added a "citation needed" tag to the statement that the street was the model for Georgian Dublin, which seems a bit broad as a statement. In addition,  while the street is regarded as the  first major Georgian development in Dublin, it might not have been the first. But minor quibbles aside, there is scope for a few thousand more words here; not bad for a street that's only a hundred yards long.:) FlowerpotmaN·(t) 16:16, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion of article
Talk:Claude Bazin de Bezons

message: This article was translated from the French version on 1 November 2006 by me.--Theloniouszen 17:32, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Macgillycuddy's Reeks

message: Those references; they are a blog (all the same blog) so is this adequate? It also looks messy the way they've been listed. I'll look at an alternative to this. Pikemaster (talk) 19:10, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Per Irish academic Paul Tempan, the author of Hills and Mountain Names in Ireland (and an expert in Irish placenames), the spelling is MacGillycuddy's Reeks.  Redirecting page to correct spelling. Britishfinance (talk) 15:04, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  It Is MacGillycuddy's Reeks, not Macgullycuddy's Reeks
Talk:Slieve Bloom Mountains

message: No one in their right mind would consider dindshenchas as history. I’ll rename this section Meaning and do some reformatting. —☸ Moilleadóir ☎ 01:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  History? 
Talk:Central Mountain Air

message: AC Network Weather external link included because Central Mountain Air serves some destinations on behalf of Air Canada.
DSatYVR 17:37, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Galtee Mountains

message: this page states that the mountains are a result of both the caledonian foldings and alpine orogeny... make up your minds...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.210.35.24 (talk) 00:28, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am proposing that we merge this article with Galty Mountain, as per Purple Mountain and Brandon Mountain.  The article will cover the main Galty peak but also the Galty range and list all the peaks in the range.  Avoids duplication and stuff going out of date (more chance of a single bigger article being kept, than many disparate ones).  For big ranges, i.e. MacGillycuddy's Reeks, there is still a separate article for the range and the individual mountains, which makes sense. Britishfinance (talk) 18:44, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  re-direct and merge with Galty Mountain
Talk:Silvermines

message: Should this article be renamed as it is currently not about the Silvermines Mountain range (Silvermines_Mountains), it is about the village of Silvermines (Silvermine_Mountains).Lukemcurley 15:57, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If there are two articles about the same place they should be merged. What name does the other Silvermines article go under? (Sarah777 20:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Samuel F. Tappan

message: Not a single reference listed.  Came to this page by way of his cousin's page, which has recently been deleted for copyright vio.  --KeithB 17:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References?

message: One of the sources listed at the bottom is a website about spiritual enlightenment. It has nothing to do with Tappan in any conceivable sense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Periwinkle1993 (talk • contribs) 14:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources?
Talk:Philosophical language

message: Thomas Urquhart's Logopandecteision is probably better described as a satire on philosophical languages than a straightforward project for a philosophical language.  See the linked Wp article. --Jim Henry 17:40, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logopandecteision 

message: I do not support the statement that Tolkien's constucted languages are a priori. They obviously adopted at least some grammatical features of real languages, e.g. the affix system of Finnish.
: I also think the sentence For example, J. R. R. Tolkien's Quenya and Sindarin, (...) are both a priori but not philosophical: they are meant to seem like natural languages, even though they have no relation to any natural languages is not entirely true. Tolkien's fiction is made so that Middle-earth is the ancient past of Europe, and Tolkien spread some puns in his invented languages so that some real-world words would be derived from his invented languages. More of this has been discussed in the TolkLang mailing list. Albmont 19:03, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A posteriori Elven Tongues 

message: Should we merge this into Engineered language?  Students of conlangs generally classify philosophical languages as a subset of what at now called engineered languages. --Jim Henry (talk) 15:05, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: I wonder, shouldn't Solresol be included / mentioned on the page, since it strikes me as a rather well-known (via "Close encounters of the third kind") taxonomical language. Am I mistaken ? Summsumm2 (talk) 09:16, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solresol
Talk:Cécile Vogt-Mugnier

message: Please see Talk:Oskar Vogt for the Cleanup issues.  The comments there apply to this article as well.
:Article has been expanded, reorganized, and cleaned. -Iamozy (talk) 23:37, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I initially thought the spouses should not be named in the lead of each scientist's lead, because that seems to imply that they are notable because of their spouse. But I can also see that since they worked so closely with each other, mention of the other spouse may be too important to leave out of the lead. Any opinions? --Iamozy (talk) 15:41, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: In this case, since they worked so closely together, I think he should be mentioned in the lead.  1bandsaw (talk) 17:38, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention of spouse in lead 
Talk:Aérospatiale N 262

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 17:47, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Adi Dravida

message: The origin of groupism i.e., caste seems to have started with people trying to refer to themselves as one group. There was no divisions and sub divisions until different people started competing for the same resources and had to organize themselves into groups to improve their chances in competing. 
Lathead 12:05, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Groupism i.e., Caste origin 

message: Another reason for groupism came from the profession followed by the differnt groups. As people changed professions, they also had to change names to reflect those professions. However they needed to differentiate themselves from people who were already using those professional names. So as people took up farming they had to call themselves Vellala. However since other groups were using Vellala as title, different groups with additional names were created. Thus were created the various groups of Vellala.
Lathead 9:18, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subdivision origin 

message: This article talks about the Adi Dravida as if they exist solely in Tamil Nadu. However, our :Adi Andhra article redirects to it and I know that Adi Dravida are also a Scheduled Caste in Andhra Pradesh. Are these two Andhra Pradesh communities the same as the Tamil Nadu one or should we have separate articles? I suspect they're the same. - Sitush (talk) 16:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andhra Pradesh 

message: Adi dravida refers to untouchable castes originating from Tamil Nadu. Similarly Adi andhra refers to untouchable castes originating from Andhra and Telangana. The same applies to Adi karnataka.I have a friend from Tamil Paraiyar caste who is registered as Adi dravida.My another telugu friend who belongs to the Telugu Panniyandi caste is registered as Adi andhra. Both of their Caste certificates are registered in Tamil Nadu.
Refer this link..
https://www.annauniv.edu/mba/pdf/community.pdf 
Adi dravida and Adi andhra should be separate articles.
தம்பிரான் (talk) 17:01, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Same
Talk:Adi Karnataka

message: Adi-karnataka is not the same as adi-dravida. There are several differences.
1. adi-karnataka people speak only kannada. They have nothing to do with tamil or never spoke tamil in their history.
2. adi-dravida are tamil-speaking people and are also called as "mAdigaru" in karnataka != adi-karnataka.
3. categorisation should therefore be under people of karnataka. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nareshov (talk • contribs) 20:05, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong redirection
Talk:Continuous positive airway pressure

message: Currently article opening sentence reads; ....which applies mild air pressure on a continuous basis to keep the airways continuously open in people who are able to breathe spontaneously on their own. Shouldn't it read UNable? Not sure...thought I would check before changing ―Buster7 ☎  16:30, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It is to support breathing in those who are already breathing spontaneously. It is not to ventilate a person who is not breathing. So yes currently correct.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:46, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead correction

message: Somehow BiPAP is being redirected to CPAP, and then never mentioned in the article.  BiPAP (bilevel positive airway pressure) and CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) are distinct, though related, technologies.  At least the redirect should be broken, if there is no page or even a mention of BiPAP here. Unitsquarehead (talk) 23:35, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect redirect BiPAP to CPAP 

message: UK, China and Italy used them to help Covid-19 patients. CPAP devices are less invasive than a ventilator, for which patients have to be heavily sedated and have a tube inserted into their airway. Early reports from Lombardy in Italy suggest about 50% of patients given CPAP have avoided the need for invasive mechanical ventilation. 
UCLH critical care consultant Prof Mervyn Singer: "These devices are a halfway house between a simple oxygen mask and invasive mechanical ventilation which requires patients to be sedated. They will help to save lives by ensuring that ventilators, a limited resource, are used only for the most severely ill."Duncan Young, Prof of Intensive Care Medicine, University of Oxford: "The use of CPAP machines in patients with contagious respiratory infections is somewhat controversial as any small leaks round the mask could spray droplets of secretions on to attending clinical staff."Mervyn Singer's respone: "if a tight seal is maintained on the mask or, even better, a helmet is worn, and clinical staff have adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) then this risk would be minimised."   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Setenzatsu.2 (talk • contribs) 19:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  COVID19
Talk:Telephone numbers in the Americas

message: "540" is the area code for rural western Virginia, including the city of Blacksburg. It is not a premium area code.
The article does not say it is a premium area code.  It says that in some areas 540 it is an exchange prefix for premium calls.
Mexico is not central america, I am editing.
:You are right. According to one definition of North America, it includes all Central America; that's of course not the definition used here. According to the other definition, North America begins at the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, and therefore almost all of Mexico is in North America. On the other hand, Mexico is not part of the North American Numbering Plan, so the North America section must be divided accordingly.132.192.14.232 01:03, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I think that calling Mexico mobile phones from outside Mexico requires a 1 after the country code but before the city code. (ie 011+52+1+81+8d for a Monterrey mobile) I believe this is a caller paid service.  Unfortunately I can find little documentation of the caller paid comment, but the 1 after the country and before the city is on http://www.kropla.com/city_mexico.htm which I have been using for many years and consider a reliable and vetted authority. If I find a credible source for the caller paid portion I will add it here (or perhaps edit the page). Mdoneil 04:04, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I found something on AT&T website, the link is in the article itself.  It states that "1" is required before the area code when calling a mobile phone and "Calls to a mobile number in Mexico will include an additional per minute mobile termination charge (MTC)". I think the MTC is something like caller-pay. As AT&T is a major US telco, its website should be quite reliable. I will add something about this into the article.--Joshua Say "hi" to me!What have I done? 13:42, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Calling to Mexican mobile phones

message: As it stands, the article is stating that N0X/N1X exchange prefixes (i.e. codes with a middle digit of 0 or 1) were not permitted until 1995, which is not correct.  Exchange codes of this format started to appear as early as 1973 in the Los Angeles area (213), and circa 1980 in New York City (212 area) due to demand.   The 1995 date is correct with regard to AREA codes being allowed to have a middle digit other than 0 or 1 (the first such being 334 in Alabama). 
Historically, the reason for N0X/N1X exchange codes not being allocated was because under the DDD plan numbers were all to be of 2L-5N (i.e. two letter, five figures) format, hence with no letters on the 0 or 1 dial position the middle digit could not be 0 or 1.  That's why area codes were assigned specifically WITH 0 or 1 as their middle digit originally, in order to provide suitable discrimination.   By the time Los Angeles was starting to run out of prefixes in the 213 NPA the all-number format was in use there, hence the ability to assign N0X/N1X codes, even though it meant a change of dial plan to accommodate them.
This whole section could do with a rewrite. 
PBC1966 (talk) 11:40, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  N0X/N1X exchange prefixes