Talk:History of cannons

message: Spain as such did not exist until 1492 when Granada was conquered.
What we now know as "Spain" and "Portugal" was in fact mostly Muslim.
It also sounds rather inappropriate.  
I have changed this to "during the wars amongst Christians and Muslim kingdoms in Spain" which is not only less biased but also more correct as the wars in Spain were among kingdoms not among Religions and much less of "Islam" against a country that didn't even exist.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Runlevel0 (talk • contribs) 11:44, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islamic War against Spain? 

message: Maybe I'm wrong, but I do not believe Machiavelli ever said,  "There is no wall, whatever its thickness that artillery will not destroy in only a few days."  Search for it yourself: 
#http://www.constitution.org/mac/artofwar.txt 
#http://books.google.com/books?id=Hi80GUS30D0C&lpg=PP1&ots=uxZKJprDpe&dq=0226500462&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.190.118.228 (talk) 05:31, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Machiavelli Quote 

message: I moved this to the plural so that it fits History of firearms and other such articles.  It also sounds really odd as singular. gren グレン 22:01, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the main Cannon article, "cannon" is both the singular and the plural. In the cannon series, that is the plural used.  --Grimhelm 06:53, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, sorry about that.  Someone fixed my mistake.  It still sounds odd to me but my move was premature and based on my usage--not proper English. gren グレン 07:39, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article should be moved to "History of the cannon", I think--WoodElf 08:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why so? We don't have "History of the firearms", do we?  --Grimhelm 11:51, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: This article is very close to passing the GA criteria: the prose is very good, the referencing is excellent, and the photos are well-sourced. The only part of the article that is not GA-status is the "Modern cannon" section.  The lead-in refers to cannon in the past tense ("Cannon were large tubular...") and omits any reference to modern cannon.  Additionally, the "Modern cannon" section itself feels like a collection of facts rather than a section of the article: its one-sentence paragraphs drift off into related armaments like mortars and howitzers, and generally stray from the "History of Cannon" topic.  
Extend the lead-in and fix the "Modern cannon" section, and it will pass the GA criteria.  Let me know via my talk page in the next week. Tlesher 02:26, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How is it now?  --Grimhelm 12:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In a word, good.  Thanks for your hard work! Tlesher 16:25, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Article status on hold 

message: Its my understanding that the use of cannons in China preceded the use in Europe by more than a hundred years, and that the technology was transferred through the Middle East or by the Mongols.  Shouldn't the introduction reflect this?  Also, are English Cannon so notable that they should be mentioned in the introduction? --lk 06:03, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Have changed and reorganized introduction.  Please discuss for balance and NPV.--lk 10:02, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First use of cannons?

message: "--->The first cannon<--- appeared in Russia around 1380, though they were used only in sieges, often by the defenders."
Says above, it was 1240s.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.123.135.255 (talk) 17:32, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction

message: "Today, United States 152 mm artillery fires Shillelagh missiles, which are guided to their targets by infra-red beams" is not true. MGM-51 Shillelagh was retired years ago. Perhaps something about precision-guided munitions, such as the XM982 Excalibur, could be added, but my English isn't up to task. 190.224.85.197 (talk) 02:46, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  We aren't in 1981 

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Jackyd101 (talk) 12:38, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps

message: This article was nominated for manual review, then after it was passed, someone else proposed its removal (too much duplicate content with cannon).  I will discuss the issue with the relevant people - please leave any comments below. We'll try to get a consensus on whether or not it should be included.  Thanks, Walkerma (talk) 09:55, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You would probably have more success discussing this over at Talk:Cannon, more people watch that page. The reason why this page is nearly a copy of Cannon is that the history section of Cannon was better than this article, so we replaced it (I discussed it with Grimhelm, who had done quite a bit of work on both articles), because the main page date for Cannon was too soon for this article to be improved. · AndonicO Engage. 11:54, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Version 0.7 

message: Why is the adal general Ahmed Gurey not added, as he is the first african commander to use canon on the african continent? And the Adal Sultanate was part of the Islamic world.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.80.208.136 (talk) 18:48, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islamic World 

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.army-technology.com/projects/bradley/
*:Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:07, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on History of cannon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081207174248/http://www.123exp-warfare.com:80/t/03804237449/ to http://www.123exp-warfare.com/t/03804237449/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on History of cannon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080226105129/http://www.history-science-technology.com/Articles/articles%202.htm to http://www.history-science-technology.com/Articles/articles%202.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070427025528/http://www.history-science-technology.com/Articles/articles%2072.htm to http://www.history-science-technology.com/Articles/articles%2072.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hms.org.uk/nelsonsnavycarronade.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hms.org.uk/nelsonsnavycarronade.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141221105911/http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq96-1.htm to http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq96-1.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on History of cannon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080213152724/http://riv.co.nz/rnza/hist/gun/rifled2.htm to http://riv.co.nz/rnza/hist/gun/rifled2.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080319011619/http://www.raytheon.com/products/ddg_1000/tech/ags/index.html to http://www.raytheon.com/products/ddg_1000/tech/ags/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719063934/http://www.442fw.afrc.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123055695 to http://www.442fw.afrc.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123055695
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is no mention of specific muzzle velocity of most cannons mentioned in this article.   This seems an omission for an encyclopedia that should provide objective information.   What I'd be interested to know is whether any bronze or iron cannon had a muzzle velocity greater than the speed of sound (and therefore whether, like bullets from a hand-gun, they create a sonic boom).  FreeFlow99 (talk) 15:24, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Velocity 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:13, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion