Talk:Police

message: Regarding section 
4.6 Military, the current photograph there only shows military police of one country, Russia. That could be joined by or replaced with another photograph that shows military police of more than one country. This https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:NH_73239_International_Police_patrol.jpg would be ideal, partly because it also shows a civilian police officer. Dreddmoto (talk) 18:16, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photographs 

message: — Assignment last updated by Lucashodges (talk) 18:24, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Senior Seminar

message: I have removed the recently added POV one sided sub section concerning the Police abolition movement from this article presented under the Conduct, accountability and public confidence section. I did it for various reasons such as: 1. General overview article covering the whole world, and that movement was already noted in many places on the page even if it is really active in just some countries, with a lot of criticism and with limited if any success for now. 2. Not a place for advocacy of any kind as per "what Wikipedia is not", especially not a place for POV sections and subsections as undue weight. 3. Better as it was, links and sentences about that movement incorporated into the body of this article exactly as it was. So just to mention, without eventual strong consensus and everything according the Wikipedia policies of what Wikipedia is not, neutrality, undue weight etc, I will always, everyday, remove those eventual changes and restore previous content. This is one encyclopedia not a blog or so. Period. Nubia86 (talk) 13:37, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello Nubia86. 1. The topic is relevant to the article. 1a. The topic was mentioned in passing in a section about police use of force and connected to one event - when the basis for the topic is broader both in geography, history and cause (hence the expansion). 2. The section wasn't advocacy; it was outlining a response to the article subject, connected to other sections within the article. 2a. Removing edits and saying they were POV does not make those edits POV. 3. "Better as it was" is your POV, it seems. --Woofboy (talk) 16:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Better as it mean also long-standing version, and any major change needs consensus, and for now, I don't see any reason for any change. My arguments are also pretty well explained, and stays all what I wrote about, especially about to this is general global overview article, the movement about abolition is with a lot of criticism and with very limited if any success for now, and better about that content and links to be incorporated into the body of this article and present subsections than creating pov subsections what should be avoided at Wikipedia. So that is it. Nubia86 (talk) 17:19, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent content removal

message: What is the background of Police? 210.213.212.92 (talk) 13:23, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criminology 

message: hi?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by God Steve (talk • contribs) 15:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 March 2023