Talk:Papal tiara

message: An image used in this article, File:Johnxxiii-color-tiara-sm.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:14, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Johnxxiii-color-tiara-sm.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: #Related_uses
"For tiaras unrelated to the papacy, see Tiara used to prove that he is the DEVIL on earth and has been known to be the most evel prson the have ever lived. the pope was also Hiterls personal advisor and is where Hitler got the ideas of world domination and race supiriority."
I hope this qualifies as vandalism. I'll take the liberty of deleting it. At the very least, it lacks a citation :)
Edit: I can't manage to find where in the source the slander is placed, and I suspect it is locked away in some template. IDK. Could some experienced editor step up and fix this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.163.83.149 (talk) 00:36, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It was leftover in the cache from some reverted vandalism. I performed a null edit to remove it completely. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Elizium23 (talk) 00:48, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silly + Overt Vandalism 

message: Could someone please fix it? It should definitely redirect to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitre instead. Thanks. 2602:306:32D3:EF0:CC42:68E2:2FE:B2E0 (talk) 07:16, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  A mitre is not a tiara.  Esoglou (talk) 07:28, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Papal Miter is redirecting to this page 

message: An IP editor is repeatedly inserting his/her view that it is incorrect to call the three-tiered papal tiara a triple tiara. The IP editor advances arguments such as "'tiara' in this case is not a synonym for any of the individual crowns, circlets or diadems but is the name of the entire headdress".  A tiara is a tiara whether the headdress has three crowns, two, one or even none.  A triple tiara is a tiara with three component elements.  Like the triple jump.  Like the triple point of a substance is the point of temperature and pressure at which the three phases (gas, liquid, and solid) of that substance coexist in thermodynamic equilibrium.   Like the Triple Entente, which was an alliance between three countries.
Unsourced arguments advanced by a Wikipedia editor are not grounds for making a statement in Wikipedia.  Wikipedia accepts only what is stated in a reliable published source.  Read WP:OR. It seems arrogant, on the basis of a Wikipedia editor's unsourced personal opinion, to tell the authors of the reliable sources that call the triregnum a triple tiara (only three examples of such sources are given) that they, not the Wikipedia editor, are wrong.  Esoglou (talk) 11:41, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and have just reverted the IP. They need to understand that they (a) need a source for the statement that it is erroneous and (b) they need to join the talk page discussion to gain consensus. FWIW, I think it is quite possible that "triple tiara" is loose use, but a source still needs to be found to confirm that. DeCausa (talk) 12:23, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triple tiara 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Papal tiara. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for //www.home.earthlink.net/~herald97/guyselvester/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:50, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This section has a quotation that's so large as to verge on plagiarism. It really needs to be cut down. Hairy Dude (talk) 01:19, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tiara of St. Sylvester 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Papal tiara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120827125632/http://www.truecatholic.us/nop/p6tiara.htm to http://www.truecatholic.us/nop/p6tiara.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Are you sure?  The grey shape split into three looks like a simplified representation of the tiara and is placed in the identical place. 109.249.181.62 (talk) 05:33, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  coat of arms missing tiara