lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Supercentenarian tracking

message: The title of this article appears to be a neologism.  Is it in wide use?  Powers T 17:07, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm. Possibly. Supercentenarian is OK, so maybe I'll move this to supercentenarian research. Carcharoth 17:14, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I thinking that I was the ome who suggested the current name, but I agree that Supercentenarian tracking is better. But whatever name is used, well done Carcharoth for making a start on the article. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure any more what the article title should be. I suggest we leave it for a few days and see what Mr Young can do with this stub. Carcharoth 17:20, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: Having visited the CfD on supercentenarian trackers, I think this article should be merged with Extreme longevity tracking. Any opinions? Carcharoth 17:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See Talk:Extreme longevity tracking. Carcharoth 17:27, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged. Carcharoth 17:48, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Bochs

message: "it is useful for capturing screen shots in researching old DOS software"
this is a ridiculous comment! in what way is capturing screenshots useful for researching DOS? and what about the other miriad of virtualisation or emulation tools that can be used to research DOS; is Bochs any better suited? i think not... and who is researching DOS these days? it is hardly the most cutting edge area of research in computer science. there are far better things to say about Bochs, for example it has a powerful internal debugger which is useful for research into current operating systems.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.128.100.78 (talk) 17:11, 2007 November 9 (UTC)
:Not to mention that it is impossible to run AmigaOS or MorphOS under BOCHS, as those are 68k/PPC based, and BOCHS only supports x86.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.176.231.100 (talk) 10:50, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Also reported, at 2016-02-20, to run on Android. 
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1465365&page=21#204 
Regards, ... PeterEasthope (talk) 16:39, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Android 

message: dunno how else to say it but I removed a couple things that were seemingly arbitrarily in this article (both unsourced, the former being pretty much pointless, and the latter having a pretty poor introductory sentence). meanwhile I should actually sign up to wiki when I'm not on a public network (lol).
worth also mentioning the history section is extremely badly worded but idk how to fix it to something better. 195.194.248.7 (talk) 11:45, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  why I removed a few things 

message: So, who owns it now? --jae (talk) 20:44, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "owned by Mandriva"
Talk:NADH dehydrogenase (quinone)

message: The article is clear and easy to understand; however, there should've been more in-text citation so that the reader would know how to get the needed information. Also, it was mentioned that the enzyme is used in the respiratory chain, so it would be better if that role was explained, and some pictures were put to clarify the idea. Nalhazmi (talk) 11:26, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Middlemarch/Archive 1

message: I added this. (God, I'm literate! :-)) SmokeyTheCat 14:43, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morrisey trivia 

message: Citing some article second-rate journal seems like poor excuse to me for making the 'criticism' section notable.  Judging by its lack of other citations its either a direct summary of the article, which doesn't seem encyclopedic, its using unsourced statements, or original claims.
Without any arguement for in the next week I'll cut the section since it's unecyclopedic no matter how you slice it.
Wilhelm Ritter 04:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism of Dorothea

message: I deleted the suggestion that Causabon perhaps had asperbergers. This is interpretation, and a rather spurious one at that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.43.227.18 (talk) 04:21, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Causabon 
Talk:PerformancePoint Server 2007

message: Please feel free to post your edits here. Microsoft's PerformancePoint Server 2007 is a complex application and any corrections to errors of fact are welcome and encouraged. Please avoid the use of marketing language or hype as it violates the rules of Wikipedia and your edits will probably be deleted.
--24.17.147.114 17:21, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Lolcat

message: Someone's going to grouse that I changed this archive, so I need to explain myself.
*  accidentally (?) removed the nomination reason when providing his or her input.
* I delved into the discussion history to find what had been removed and why.
* When I did, I found that many of the contributions to the discussion had been placed at the top of the page before prior contributions as opposed to at the bottom in continuous chronological order.  Whether this was done on accident, or to lend credence to their input as opposed to those who came before them, I don't know.
In my reconstitution, I replaced 's original deletion nomination, as well as restructured the discussion in chronological and discussional order.  I made no other changes to the comments and input of the contributors, as verifiable in this diff.  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 17:24, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  reconstitution
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Bencherlite

message: Category talk:46
Category:1907
Image:12
Mainspace5587
Portal:1
Talk:718
Template talk:15
Template:34
User talk:3176
User:312
Wikipedia talk:175
Wikipedia:839
avg edits per page 1.40
earliest19:59, 22 July 2006
number of unique pages9132
total12822
* The edit count was retrieved from this link at 17:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for Bencherlite

message: If anybody is still watching this, thank you for your support and I look forward to having an adminship as uneventful as this RfA! BencherliteTalk 08:46, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks
Talk:Radioactive scrap metal

message: Is there any systematic attempt to monitor scrap metal at collection, shipping, warehousing, and usage locations, to detect radioactive contamination?  Previously, monitoring was done only around a small number of large industrial or research facilities specifically dealing with radioactive material.  There was discussion of widening the monitoring for radioactive materials, and this idea spread more widely after 2001, but have there been any significant changes as a result?  The cost and practicality of small radioactivity detectors has improved dramatically over the past century, but has this resulted in more widespread deployment of such devices, like the proliferation of miniaturized video cameras?  Reify-tech (talk) 20:07, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Preventive detection and monitoring?

message: Hi, contacted authorities as found potential contamination in some steel pins sold with a children's art kit.
One pin actually registered high enough that my counter showed a warning light after 40 minutes of exposure.
Any ideas? These things seem to be quite common and there was a similar event a few years back with 5G "pendants" that contained thorium and other radionuclides that made the news yet not mentioned here. 78.111.195.1 (talk) 20:51, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible 2023 incident?
Talk:The Dying Earth

message: I just finished reading this particular book and I don't recall the sandestins being seen or mentioned. Perhaps my memory is faulty, they appeared without that name, or their existence was inferred or implied, but if I'm right about this, then shouldn't they be removed the "Creatures of the Dying Earth" section of this article? Please let me know. --Thylacine24 (talk) 23:53, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Were the sandestins seen or mentioned in this book? 

message: Has no-one else noticed that this character appears in two of the stories and dies under different circumstances in each one?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.28.132.199 (talk) 21:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. But when he reappeared I always assumed that he was just badly wounded and somehow recovered after his first appearance. I don't think it's actually stated that he died, just described that he was (almost?) dying. Daranios (talk) 21:23, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liane the Wayfarer
Talk:KDYL (AM)

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the ICAO code reference to an airport is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the airport. - Dravecky (talk) 04:49, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:British land speed record

message: Perhaps this should be renamed National land speed records and expanded to include various nations? 70.55.200.211 (talk) 02:57, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: more nations?

message: An obvious question is over what distance were the records of Fallows and Newby timed over? Do they get a certificate? How are the records recorded? By the MSA? See:  Note some of these records are incorrect. Rupertlt (talk) 10:11, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Details of records

message: Definition of the Flying Mile should be included, as well as the fact that actor Idris Elba set a new record recently.
http://www.gizmag.com/bentley-continental-gt-flying-mile/37421/
"A Bentley Continental GT Speed driven by actor Idris Elba has set a new British land speed record. The "Flying Mile" takes the average speed of a vehicle across two rolling-start runs of a mile (1.6 km) each. Elba achieved an average speed of 180.361 mph (290.263 km/h)."
74.61.33.210 (talk) 22:26, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: New Record Set 2015/05/08

message: FWIW, the first seven paragraphs (and title) of our article's section 'Historical records' are reproduced word-for-word (bar reformatting of dates from dd month yyyy to month dd, yyyy) on this web page (which is the first entry in the article's External links section) without any visible acknowledgement to Wikipedia. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 2.217.209.143 (talk) 05:30, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unacknowledged copying
Talk:KUSU-FM

message: This article is confusing translator, repeaters and simulcast.
A translator (in the United States)  has a callsign of ?xxxZZ    (? is K or W, xxx is the FM channel number, and ZZ is a unique identifier).  Translators are limited to 250 watts.
A licensed station with a 4 character callsign ?ZZZ is a fully licensed station which is permitted to originate its own programming.   Other than the station ID near the top of the hour and 30 seconds of fund raising on non-commercial stations, a translator is not allowed to originate any programming.   The fact that a licensee chooses to simulcast their programming on another fully licensed station does not make that radio station a "translator".
The term repeater doesn't apply to broadcast FM radio.  A repeater is a transmitter used to listen on one frequency for any low power input from any source (like a handheld radio or car transmitter) and rebroadcast that signal on a different frequency with a stronger signal from an antenna up higher (like 2 Meter amateur radios, public safety, cabs, etc...). 
See http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/translator.html#WHATIS
69.37.2.254 (talk) 12:51, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translator vs repeater
Talk:KUMT

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the ICAO code reference to an airport is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the airport. It's not about which subject is more famous, just that the radio station is primarily identified by this name while the airport is primarily identified by its full name with the ICAO code only a secondary reference to that airport. - Dravecky (talk) 14:48, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page

message: Re: "after a few days of stunting". What the heck is that supposed to mean? Bhami (talk) 15:28, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "stunting"?
Talk:Sulfite reductase

message: This is obsolete, see EC link. Here: https://www.rhea-db.org/reaction?id=10544 is stated there was not enough evidence. --SCIdude (talk) 08:29, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: As per this page and this site: "EC 1.8.99.1 is now covered by EC 1.8.1.2, assimilatory sulfite reductase (NADPH) and EC 1.8.7.1, assimilatory sulfite reductase (ferredoxin)", so this page needs to be split into those two. Or I guess moved to one and then another be made. KingisNitro (talk) 19:25, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted
Talk:1931–32 Toronto Maple Leafs season

message: In the section of the team roster, both Bob Gracie and Earl Miller are listed as having uniform number 14. Gracie and Miller were with the team during the playoffs, so I don't see how they could wear the same number at the same time. Is there an error here?--Rockedaz (talk) 15:56, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Uniform Numbers of Players
Talk:1963–64 Toronto Maple Leafs season

message: The info about him in these article ("Free agent") is incorrect (see Milan Marcetta and the sources in that article)--Unikalinho (talk) 22:23, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Milan Marcetta 
Talk:Welsh poetry

message: This article describes "stafell Cynddylan" as the earliest recorded literary work by a woman in Northern Europe.
Firstly, is the writer accepted as Heledd? I thought that was generally accepted to be a literary conceit, and we do not know the name or sex of the composer.
There is no definition given of "northern Europe", and no references for evidence of no other female writers in the area (not that that matters if the sentence above is correct).
Should this bit of information be deleted?
And possibly get rid of the adjective "haunting", which seems a bit of an odd word to use. ("Which some people call haunting", with a reference seems a bit over the top and -well, useless.)
Don't want to alter it immediately myself without anyone else chipping in as my knowledge on this subject is minimal, but just seems oddly written.
Ceiniog (talk) 00:51, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

message: This article needs to be developed, or deleted: It started long ago, but seems largely to have stood still. Energy might better be spent on the two main Welsh literature articles. Rwood128 (talk) 20:24, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete article? 
Talk:University of St Andrews RFC

message: As a member of St Andrews University RFC and to celebrate our 150th anniversary next year I am in the process of completing this entry with the permission of the UStARFC Sesquicentenial web page creator, another club member. I will endeavour to cite all relevant data and resolve any copyright issues. The club history remains the intellectual property  of the UStARFC. Willbunn 18:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read the guide to requesting and formalizing permission to use copyrighted works on Wikipedia.  Note that, in addition to copyright requirements, the article must still comply with notability guidelines, advertising prohibition and avoid conflicts of interest. — Coren (talk) 18:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: My feeling is that this club does not deserve a page to itself — general consensus has been in the past that student societies do not get their own page, unless particularly notable. This club *may* be notable, but only if its history can be established via independent sources, and is sufficiently interesting to warrant mention. Given the lack of information on this page at the moment, I feel it would surely be better to merge this information to the university's main page. Rlfb 15:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Right to silence in England and Wales

message: I moved this section from Right to silence but it needs a lot of work in terms of style and references.Dubitante 18:32, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: The article completely fails to mention Schedule 7 f the Terrorism act of 2000. Schedule 7 threatens people detained under it with a prison sentence should they refuse to answer any and all questions posed to them. Even though this is supposed to be only used in terrorism cases, this restriction is not respected in practice. Apparently, UK authorities consider any political activist working against the government or the ruling elites a Terrorist under schedule 7 and treat them accordingly (for examples, see here and here). So why is this not mentioned? Wefa (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Schedule 7?
Talk:Water Resources Development Act of 2007

message: "The bill authorizes the projects but does not appropriate the money for them. Appropriation of funds will have to be taken care of in subsequent legislation."
from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/08/washington/08cnd-spend.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
swain 18:35, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Funding

message: I added this template because this article has a lot of quotes that are nothing more than opinions, many of them containing non-factual or colorful language that I believe is inappropriate for Wikipedia 199.123.72.97 (talk) 17:51, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: POV Check
Talk:Open carry in the United States/Archive 1

message: At this time, this entry is in it's early formation. I just posted the first draft a few seconds ago and found that the neutrality is disputed, as this is not an opinion article but factual references to the topic added into Wikipedia's great compendium I see no cause for early debate.
*As I've asked on your talk page, please stop removing NPOV tags without discussion. --JChap 07:24, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First draft

message: I've been a copy editor and technical editor for years.  This article was listed as needing copy editing.  I've made some changes.  Let me know if there are any questions/disagreements. --PTR 20:32, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyediting
Talk:Great Beijing Wheel

message: Articles :Great Beijing Wheel and :Beijing Great Wheel duplicate each other. The company and sources cited call the wheel "Beijing Great Wheel". Also, Beijing Great Wheel was created first and it has more content. I suggest merging and redirecting "Great Beijing Wheel" there. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I merged these articles and added a redirect to the unofficial name Great Beijing Wheel article. Timsdad (talk) 02:20, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate articles
Talk:Castle Pines Village, Colorado

message: There is no CDP named The Village at Castle Pines, Colorado. This article was merged to this title in 2018, but I think this was done in error. There is a housing development called The Village at Castle Pines, but it's juts one of thousands of such developments in Colorado and it's not incorporated. The real name of the CDP is just Castle Pines, at least according to the Census Bureau's website. There is also the City of Castle Pines, but this is completely separate from the Castle Pines CDP.
I am wondering if this article was changed to "The Village at Castle Pines, Colorado" to promote the real estate aspects of the housing development. 
The article says the name was "officially changed" but there's no reference to back this up, the CDP's name has not been changed. I think the move was not warranted. I think the name of the article should be "Castle Pines (Census designated place)."
As it stands right now, this article is providing false information. It says that The Village at Castle Pines is a CDP, and that's not accurate. Any comments? Jeffrey Beall (talk)  20:09, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is no CDP named '''The Village at Castle Pines, Colorado'''
Talk:Government of the 1st Scottish Parliament

message: As someone who originally raised the name change of the Scottish Executive to Scottish Government (a bit early it turned out!), i'm not sure this is at the right name.  At the time it was the Scottish Executive, so shouldn't this sit at Executive of the 1st Scottish Parliament? Regan123 19:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I created and then subsequently moved Executive of the 1st Scottish Parliament for consistency, its either or with me the Executive was the Executive (government) so the current title still works. --Barryob  Vigeur de dessus 20:55, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK.  Could we alter the intro line to make it clear it was the Executive at the time.  I do go for consistency normally, but here I think the "rebranding" may turn out to be a more significant event in the future.  Clarifying the change is good for our readers. Regan123 21:27, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done :). --Barryob  Vigeur de dessus 21:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - that was quick!  It's nice to come across articles like this - clean and effective. Regan123 21:44, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem previously all the lists where on one page see here and it was getting quite messy so I broke them up and swiped the layout from the Irish Government . --Barryob  Vigeur de dessus 23:05, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: Why is there no information on what the various Scottish governments/executives actually did? Surely that is more important than the names of ministers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.168.190.109 (talk) 11:42, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Policies
Talk:Fembots (Austin Powers)

message: There's not a whole lot to this article and it could easily be stripped down and placed into Characters in Austin Powers. I'd do it myself, but don't have time at the moment. 
The non-free images on this page are probably worth looking at, as well. Forteblast 19:17, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Kugelpanzer

message: A free illustration can be found at :ru:File:Mashina nabludatelya.JPG --Ghirla-трёп- 00:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: text very close - could be interpreted as copyvio. GraemeLeggett (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: "The Kugelpanzer is simply listed as Item #37 and is painted gloss gray."
"no metal samples are allowed to be taken from it"
Isn't it really negative description of the museum? I mean all museums are enlisting items, however part of Kubinka collection is described here like "unique artifact lost to the civilized world". If you wanted to mention Kubinka, you could say something about great job they are doing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.70.158.137 (talk) 03:05, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  negative description