Talk:Fortaleza

message: Fortaleza does not seem to be a world city at all! WhisperToMe 02:27, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:                               

message: It's clear that the "tourism" section was written by someone who can barely communicate in English. The tone also suggests that the author works in the tourism industry, which is not a problem of course, but  a more level headed synopsis of Foraleza's attractions would be more proper for a Wikipedia entry. A rewrite is definitely in order, preferably by someone who has visited Fortaleza, Brazil and speaks English fluently.
so right, wikipedia ignores the high crime rate not one mentions as usual!  puff pieces  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.163.162.160 (talk) 16:36, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yikes. 

message: I am wondering what is the goal of all those hearts♥ at the end of every paragraph...? what do they mean? Noaa 08:38, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hearts

message: The main problem with this page is that it was written only by natives. It is not a problem in itself, but if you have not travelled abroad you can not properly grade your own home. And that is the source for sentences like "the wildest monday of the world". If your "world" is your own city, this becomes a proper sentence. English mistakes should be corrected by english native speakers (I have probably committed many mistakes here myself).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Martins346 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simple mindedness 

message: The reference to the Federal University of Ceara (UFC) is linking to "Ultimate Fighting Championship", which is non-sense  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.107.228.18 (talk) 20:59, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  UFC 

message: Hi, I have added an external  link to the Fortaleza page and it has been removed being judged a promotional link. However, almost all links in the Fortaleza page have promotional content (mostly concerning tourist accommodation in Fortaleza), therefore if my link should be removed than it is only fair that almost all the other links are removed as well. Otherwise my link should be allowed like the others, rules should be the same for everyone.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.36.159.13 (talk) 12:52, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Per Editor assistance request, your link was inappropriate. However there was a whole subsection of links that did not meet our guidelines for external links so I have removed the subsection. Some links were commercial, most self published, none were officially related to the subject, some were non english language (this being en:WP), none were referenced from the article text and Wikipedia is not a directory of links or a travel guide (that is what Wikitravel is for and we have a link to that). Relevant material from those links should be integrated into the article with primary, and non self published sources. If anyone thinks any of them merit inclusion they should discuss them here rather than re-add them. Mfield (talk) 18:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fortaleza External Link 

message: In my opinion, Fortaleza is the 4th largest city in Brazil by population. Brasília doesn't have a larger population than Fortaleza. What is usually taken as "the population of Brasília" is, in fact, the population of the Federal District. And I don't think that Planaltina, Sobradinho and Gama are the "same city" as Brasília.  Siaraman (talk) 19:14, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This is exactly what you pointed it out to be: an opinion. Thus WP:OR or your WP:POV. Regardless of what people think, Brazilian census information places the city at the fifth largest city in the country. 08OceanBeachS.D. 22:11, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, the Census is wrong, because it uses wrong criteria. The "indivisibility of the Federal District" creates this distortion. Siaraman (talk) 13:08, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's the 4th largest city in Brazil 

message: The passage about "social problems" is a mere claim, and at least controversial, so I think it should best be deleted. Other sources claim that the north-east of Brasil and Fortaleza in particular is one of the most dangerous areas in Brasil (actually, it has the 10th highest homicide rate in the country). The whole passage seems to be rather anectodic. There seems to be organized crime, see the robbery of the Banco central: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banco_Central_burglary_at_Fortaleza. On January 3, 2012, the whole public life broke down during a strike of the police, when looting by gangs took place.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.223.106.29 (talk) 21:09, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Security and criminality 

message: There appears to be a typo in the climate chart. The "Mean monthly sunshine hours" for August reads "167.4", but this is not consistent with the other data. I suspect a typo for "267.4" but can't be sure. Eclecticology (talk) 05:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate 

message: What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content. Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 15:17, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Timeline of Fortaleza]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Fortaleza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070928155316/http://blog.mmapredictions.com/2007/07/14/move-over-rio-make-room-for-fortaleza/ to http://blog.mmapredictions.com/2007/07/14/move-over-rio-make-room-for-fortaleza/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070703024153/http://www.fortaleza.ce.gov.br/diom/dom13338.pdf to http://www.fortaleza.ce.gov.br/diom/dom13338.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080416022636/http://www.sister-cities.org:80/icrc/directory/Americas/Brazil to http://www.sister-cities.org/icrc/directory/Americas/Brazil
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:10, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Fortaleza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6H7Jql2A9?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.brookings.edu%2Fresearch%2Finteractives%2Fglobal-metro-monitor-3 to http://www.brookings.edu/research/interactives/global-metro-monitor-3
*Added  tag to http://www.reference.com/browse/fortaleza
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.inmet.gov.br/webcdp/climatologia/normais/imagens/normais/planilhas/Temperatura-Media-Compensada_NCB_1961-1990.xls
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.inmet.gov.br/webcdp/climatologia/normais/imagens/normais/planilhas/Temperatura-Maxima_NCB_1961-1990.xls
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.inmet.gov.br/webcdp/climatologia/normais/imagens/normais/planilhas/Temperatura-Minima_NCB_1961-1990.xls
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.inmet.gov.br/webcdp/climatologia/normais/imagens/normais/planilhas/Precipitacao-Acumulada_NCB_1961-1990.xls
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.inmet.gov.br/webcdp/climatologia/normais/imagens/normais/planilhas/Numero-Dias-Precipitacao-Maior-ou-Igual-1mm_NCB_1961-1990.xls
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.inmet.gov.br/webcdp/climatologia/normais/imagens/normais/planilhas/Insolacao-Total_NCB_1961-1990.xls
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.inmet.gov.br/webcdp/climatologia/normais/imagens/normais/planilhas/Umidade-Relativa-Mensal-Media-Compensada_NCB_1961-1990.xls
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Deplorable is the paragraph that wikipedia uses to advertise a specific municipal management. Please abolish the partisan paragraph.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.36.172.27 (talk) 03:08, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please no political propaganda 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Fortaleza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.brookings.edu/research/interactives/global-metro-monitor-3
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/Constituicao.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130925080407/http://www.metrofor.ce.gov.br/index.php/mapa-das-linhas to http://www.metrofor.ce.gov.br/index.php/mapa-das-linhas
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706160845/http://www.aprece.org.br/site/?prefeitura=41&acao=destaques&subacao=exibir&codigo=676 to http://www.aprece.org.br/site/?prefeitura=41&acao=destaques&subacao=exibir&codigo=676
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:27, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Fortaleza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911142609/http://www.oktiva.net/oktiva.net/1364/nota/54393 to http://www.oktiva.net/oktiva.net/1364/nota/54393
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131113122200/http://www.oktiva.net/oktiva.net/1364/nota/54403 to http://www.oktiva.net/oktiva.net/1364/nota/54403
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140222045329/http://www.fortaleza.ce.gov.br/amc/ctafor to http://www.fortaleza.ce.gov.br/amc/ctafor
*Added  tag to http://clipping.planejamento.gov.br/Noticias.asp?NOTCod=349005
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070920194232/http://www.setfor.fortaleza.ce.gov.br/ to http://www.setfor.fortaleza.ce.gov.br/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:55, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: "municipality's GDP per capita was R$17.359,53."
Should it be R$17,359?
I wonder if it was copied over from some other language and that's how they wrote the number?
75.142.254.3 (talk) 18:27, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo?