lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Operation Pin

message: Why does the article state that Operation Pin is effectively committing a criminal offence? They are advertising/running fake sites so they would fall outside of the legislation...--Purple strain 18:47, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Does anyone know why the see also link points to Perverted-Justice entry? I saw nothing that had anything to do with Operation Pin so I removed it. --DizFreak 04:20, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed that someone went ahead and added it back in without reason. Operation PIN has to do with Child Porn, Perverted-Justice is not law enforcement nor does is child porn in their mission statement. Deleting again. --DizFreak  talk 07:55, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it would be an appropriate see also to have. While they're not directly related to each other, they're both sting efforts to catch pedophilic predators. --Icarus (Hi!) 03:23, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: See Also

message: I removed the following paragraph:
:It is also a controversial scheme. In the United Kingdom at least, it is an offence to advertise locations where indecent photographs of children are shown or distributed. If Operation Pin's websites do indeed "'look like the real thing", their operators would be committing a criminal offence under UK law (the Protection of Children Act 1978, section 1(1)(d)).
This paragraph appears to contradict content stated earlier in the article. The article says that the sting sites would not contain any actual child pornography; they will only claim to show or distribute it, and it sounds like the Act makes it an offense advertise actual access to it. If this argument has actually been used against the operation, and can be properly sourced, then it can be included. But without such a source, it appears to be someone's personal analysis and a faulty one at that. --Icarus (Hi!) 03:23, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed paragraph

message: This article, regardless of it's quality, is of high importance to the law enforcement project.  It deals with several countries participating in an international project that had consequential decisions made for the future of law enforcement and laws regarding entrapment/honey-pots.  The legality of honey-pots being used in the U.S. is questionable as it is regarded by many as entrapment, which is not a legal practice by law enforcement in the U.S.   Entrapment typically occurs when law enforcement induces or encourages individuals to commit crimes they would not have otherwise committed.eximo (talk) 21:54, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance of this article for the wikiproject law enforcement: Discussion
Talk:Counselor

message: aren't there two l's?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.232.236.216 (talk) 04:08, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  counselor

message: I will add this page to my list of things to do. I recommend making a disambigution page. This page can be a disambiguation page, and we can have a page for "professional counselor", which should probably redirect to psychotherapywhicky1978 04:21, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see no problem merging this with Counseling provided that page deals with the welter of related pages, which I have now listed in the See Also section of this article.--Ziji  (talk email) 09:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: I'm now attempting to get an article on rape crisis counselor written. Simesa (talk) 23:26, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rape crisis counselor
Talk:Howard McCurdy

message: Howard McCurdy was not the first African Canadian elected to Parliament. It was none other than Lincoln Alexander back in 1968. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.60.168.186 (talk • contribs) 
He's listed in the article as the first African-Canadian elected for the NDP.  CJCurrie 04:28, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Norther

message: As far as I know the MySpace page isn't 'official' in the strictest sense but Norther do know of it's existence and it is one of two MySpace pages linked to Norther.net. For this reason I didn't move it when creating the 'Fansites' subsection but I did edit the name of the link. 
Meiriceá 04:29, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: MySpace page

message: It seems Unleash Hell disambiguates to this page, any reason why? CircafuciX 06:43, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unleash Hell disambiguation 

message: please don't be greedy with trying to get your picture up. the picture uploaded by Dgc1988 is an awful representation of the band! It just has petri-- very poor. Ambrosemp (talk) 00:33, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band picture 

message: I just noticed that the years active section only uses the years that they were known as Norther. Would it be more accurate to use 1996 or not? FireCrystal (talk) 22:10, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  years active section 

message: New song was being worked on around the end of February 2010 and will be released later this April to introduce to fans the new singer and guitarist. Kristian Ranta (it looks like) recorded his solo in the studio's sauna. Kind of interesting. Information can be pulled from this video if anyone is interested in kicking off the new album section (which sounds like it's going to be recorded through the summer). – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 19:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New song (April 2010)
Talk:Embraer EMB 121 Xingu

message: What does the French Air Force do with them? V. Joe 04:29, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: "Xingu (pronounced "shingoo")"  Is that "shin-goo" or "shing-goo"? 104.153.40.58 (talk) 01:19, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Beastmaster (TV series)

message: The article states that "It's never quite clear exactly how or why this would defeat such a powerful evil being, but it's central premise of the story in the third season." However, by the end of the series it seems that it is made rather clear that by rounding up his family, Dar will be able to then imprison this great evil in the crystal ark while freeing them from it, and in the process return them permanetly to human form.
The premise, and even Dar's companions are based on Andre Norton's novels, as was previously stated.  Why has this fact been removed?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamandrewssoul (talk • contribs) 11:02, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Defeating Balcifer

message: I keep seeing this listed as 4x01 but I can't find any info so what the heck is it?? Novadestin (talk) 00:27, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, found that it was supposed to be the episode for the next season but was never made.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Novadestin (talk • contribs) 00:36, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rededication

message: BM (in the series) used a very specific (cool looking) weapon. White, consisted of two parts that could be double wielded or could be connected and wielded as one weapon (which had length of a bo stick). one part ended with a short blade and the other with a "ball" like a mace. It was one of the signature items of the series. It would be good to add it. Setenzatsu (talk) 22:34, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weapon, picture
Talk:Under the Rainbow

message: The "Plot synopsis" section consists of about 20 paragraphs.  How the heck is that a "synopsis"?  Somebody might want to shorten this or split it into two sections. WillieBlues (talk) 23:36, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Synopsis?

message: Critics are idiots. This is one of the funniest movies of all time.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.67.119.190 (talk) 03:17, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Critics
Talk:Satan Speaks!

message: Does this book have an ISBN?  Rklawton 04:34, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Is this misspelling really in/on the book as published?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.114.238.105 (talk) 17:40, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Unorthadox"? 

message: There is no evidence to claim the author is "the most misunderstood man in America". I believe this is misleading to the reader. Please verify the claim and remove the inappropriate like "the most misunderstood man in America"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirubasuthan (talk • contribs) 05:49, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the most misunderstood man in America"?
Talk:Salad Days (manga)

message: No one is probably reading this but I'll write up an article for Salad Days and figure out how to expand the article to be a bit fuller. ShoutaShura 02:33, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article

message: Licensed as Salad Days by M&C Comics. Arsonal (talk) 04:54, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indonesian license
Talk:Hyangchal

message: A Silla era Korean poem in Hyangchal
处容歌
처용가
東京明期月良夜入伊遊行如可
入良沙寢矣見昆脚烏伊四是良羅
二兮隱吾下於叱古二兮隱誰支下焉古
本矣吾下是如馬於隱奪叱良乙何如爲理古
셔블 발기다래 밤드리 노니다가
드러사 자리보곤 가라리 네히여라
둘은 내해 엇고 둘은 뉘해난고?
본디 다 내해다마라난 아사놀 엇디하릿고
Seo'beul bal'gi'da'rae bam'deu'ri no'ni'da'ga
Deu'reo'sa ja'ri'bo'gon ga'ra'ri ne'hi'yeo'ra
Dul'eun nae'hae eot'go dul'eun nwi'hae'nan'go?
Bon'di da nae'hae'da'ma'ra'nan a'sa'nol eot'di'ha'rit'go
薯童谣
서동요
善化公主主隱
他密只嫁良置古
薯童房乙
夜矣卯乙抱遣去如
20:10, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Suspected sock puppets/Frater FiatLux

message: I've been going over user Kephera975's contributions, and something smells a bit fishy here. Theres a large gap inbetween edits (march first to june first), and I'm wondering if this is another sock, or maybe fiatlux himself.
Remember this? well zanoni never commented, just kephera, seems a bit strange. I think you've already dealt with this on Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Zanoni666 and the other evidence in on your talk page here.
*This looks like whats happening right now. Its the exact same thing thats being pushed as I write this.
As for frater fiatlux...
*here he states his ip address is 84.71.75.180, yet i recall when he first made his user page...he makes a comment on his first account, which was an anon with an ip address of 84.71.159.105here
*maybe we should document, as further evidence, just how many times hes been blocked? (block log)
:i'm also thinking that user GnomedPume and SororAC should be documented as evidence
::I hope this all helps out a bit, i'm going hunting for more :)  Zos 05:00, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok so here is where Frater FiatLux actually begins on Wikipedia. Zos 05:04, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Highlighter

message: Here is a link with a lot of information if someone wants to sort through it http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?IA=US2004035531&DISPLAY=DESC Dav2008 05:02, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Technical Information

message: It says "original research" for saying it's yellow, but I'm pretty sure we all know Yellow is the most common colour for a highlighter. And bonus 10 points for those of you who didn't see "hitler" at first when they read "highlighter". 24.129.237.34 (talk) 05:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most common hiliter colour
Talk:List of Megas XLR episodes

message: Ok, I've created this page so it's more inline with other articles on TV shows. some notes:
*The image names for the season 1 screenshots are messed up and some don't line up with the actual episode number
*The colours I've used are the colours of Megas! (they might need to be made web safe)
*Some of the descriptions are pretty bad and could do with better ones
*The air dates, production numbers are from the TV.com pages on Megas XLR episodes
well.. that's it. Enjoy! BillPP 05:06, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Created 

message: Dates are mostly inaccurate. Megas aired between 2004-5. According to this page, some of Season 2 aired while Season 1 was airing. I have yet to find an list of dates that I KNOW is accurate, because some of the episodes aired out of order, but I am working on it.
Falseinfinity (talk) 16:43, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode Air Dates 
Talk:South Auckland

message: This page needs references for its conclusion. Otherwise, it sounds like they were just plucked out of thin air. GeorgeLouis 05:17, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: One big problem of this request is that the usage is real, but it is understood only intrinsically in New Zealand.  Outside the country it is not used.  In New Zealand there has been very few serious attempts to write down and define what South Auckland because it is perceived it will only need to be done in order to explain the term to someone from overseas and "no one from outside NZ will be using it, and since New Zealanders already know the term through family upbringing, so why bother".  Any attempts to write down this usage, as at 2006, will thus have largely no written sources to serve as research references.  --JNZ 07:56, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs references

message: I would just like to say that Onehunga and Penrose are part of South Central Auckland and not 'South Auckland'. South Auckland starts from Mangere Bridge.
:Yes thats correct South Auckland does not include Penrose and Mount Wellington, the correct changes have been made. Although South Auckland does include the suburb 'Onehunga'. --HannahSamuels 05:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Most people would not consider Onehunga to be in 'South Auckland'; instead, Onehunga is on the Auckland isthmus (albeit at its southern end). 'South Auckland' is generally thought of as starting below the Auckland isthmus - i.e., beginning with the narrow strip of land where the Manukau Harbour comes close to the Tamaki Estuary - i.e., Otahuhu and south. Ross Finlayson (talk) 14:14, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Onehunga and Penrose

message: This article needs to be removed or edited to be the Counties Manukau region. South Auckland is not a real nor legal name for this area.
This page looks like it was just created by someone who wanted to make the area out took like South Central; none of the information is either relevant or accurate. Wikikohe (talk) 21:53, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming of this article.
Talk:Minor characters in Archie Comics

message: Are these characters meant to be alphabetical?  If so, it's messed up.  If not, is there some measure of sub-categories we could put here? Kilyle 05:20, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say it's just thrown together (much like the Archie universe itself) and could benefit from some organization (there is a strict List of Archie Comics characters as well which I added some organization to a while ago) ... --Invisifan 14:39, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Format

message: Should Jason Blossom and Cricket O'Dell be removed from here now that they have their own Wikipedia pages? Shadzane (talk) 20:37, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Longer Minor? 

message: I noticed someone added Chili Dog, a character who only appeared in spin-off media and never in the comics.  Is that appropriate?  Shadzane (talk) 19:38, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Never in Comics 

message: Doesn't this go against WP's no self-references policy? 86.158.191.109 (talk) 02:39, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed it!  Shadzane (talk) 08:51, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention of Wikipedia in lead
Talk:Theodore Roosevelt Sr.

message: "A participant in the dazzling New York society life, one historian 
described him as a man of both "good works and good times."
Who was the historian and what was the source?
GeorgeLouis 05:21, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for Citation 

message: What is needed in this article to make it better?
(RM MARTIN (talk) 04:46, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is needed by article? 

message: The article seems to weigh on the psychological relationship between Sr. and Jr.  I do not know that is appropriate, but if it is, it should be noted that Jr. abandoned his newborn daughter, Alice (later Mrs. Nicholas Longworth) so that he could "find himself" after the death of his mother and wife, so the trait of ducking responsibility (either by avoiding service in the Civil War or otherwise) may have been part of the family's genetic makeup.John Paul Parks (talk) 18:41, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Psychoanalysis Appropriate?
Talk:Zyxel

message: Seems more like an advertisement than anything else Missvain 05:26, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Never heard of them, they must suck" is a terrible excuse. ZyXEL is a well known brand in network hardware. --85.197.239.175 (talk) 03:25, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

text: "I'm doing some research to see just how badly they suck. Google's search results" Better expand your sources.  ZyXel is a big company, reputable enough to have their equipment used by major corporations. --122.2.226.156 (talk) 11:48, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[ZyXEL]]

message: Never heard of them but we've got a vendor who wants to set us up with their routers. I'm doing some research to see just how badly they suck. Google's search results have been getting crap of late, makes it very difficult to find decent, valuable feedback. Too many sites are just link aggregators, either linking to or reprinting the content of other sites. They're trash and should be filtered out of the results. --Gmuir 15:44, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Never heard of them, they must suck" is a terrible excuse. ZyXEL is a well known brand in network hardware. --85.197.239.175 (talk) 03:25, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

text: "I'm doing some research to see just how badly they suck. Google's search results" Better expand your sources.  ZyXel is a big company, reputable enough to have their equipment used by major corporations. --122.2.226.156 (talk) 11:48, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unbiased Info?
Talk:Wagons East

message: I remember quite distinctly seeing parts of this movie being used to demonstrate advances in SFX, by taking John Candy from one shot and placing him against a different background (the matter was complicated because he was holding a transparent bottle at the time). It seems to me this would be worthy of note, although the article says that all of his scenes were completed before his death. Does anyone have more info? David 20:07, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CGI used to complete scenes? 

message: Both Both Ethan Phillips and Robert Picardo were in ST:V starting in 1995. 2001:56A:FA85:3800:7C50:1695:6045:C6C5 (talk) 00:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Star Trek: Voyager]]
Talk:Acer leucoderme

message: I added the scan to this article. As soon as Autumn hits here, I'll get the gold leaves for use on the page. Look for flowers to come in February 2007. Noles1984 18:46, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaves 

message: Good Afternoon, Wikipedians!  I am editing this page for a school project and either adding or editing the following sections:
* Introduction
* Description
* Taxonomy
* Distribution and habitat
* Toxicity
* Cultivation
* Pests and Diseases
* References
If you're interested in following my progress, my sandbox for this page can be found here: User:Sally_Shoemaker/chalk_maple_sandbox  —Preceding undated comment added 20:55, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia School Project
Talk:Wait 'til You're Older

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 09:42, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Wait 'til You're Older →  – Correct capitalization Nicholas0 (talk) 02:54, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). --Ahecht (TALKPAGE) 18:24, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 May 2021
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Pudgenet/Evidence

message: Durin: I don't want to make this an issue on the evidence page because my evidence is long enough and I'd prefer to leave some room in case I have more to say about Pudgenet, but I see that you're putting some blame on me regarding edit warring so I'll deal with it here.
I sought your advice here, where I asked "Now, how do I go about reinserting the Brian D Foy entry without getting you mad at me?" but you never responded. I was forced to use my own judgement. I thought I had good reason to believe that Pudgenet was reverting my edits improperly, which arguably was vandalism, and I used that as my basis for reverting him. I even changed my wording based on his edit summary complaints in an attempt to please him. I also took it to the talk page to see what others had to say and changed my edits according to the desires of others (Rob).
I admit to paying little attention to the frequency of my reversions, but I was never warned after your first warning (in which you admitted that I hadn't violated the 3 revert rule), and it seemed obvious to me that I was doing the right thing. Your frustration with Pudgenet is understandable, but I think you should have responded to me when I asked how to go about reinserting the edit that Pudgenet reverted, which I actually think you should have reinserted when you gave Pudgenet the second, stronger warning for reverting it.
In your statement, you say "Both parties have been deserving of blocks regarding the revert war." I disagree, and I don't see evidence that I deserved being blocked. -Barry- 05:30, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the RFAR/Pudgenet page and so I feel this discussion doesn't belong here.  Ideogram 08:56, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here it says "All participants are subject to Arbitration Committee decisions, and the ArbCom will consider each participant's role in the dispute," so I figured I should defend myself somewhere. -Barry- 14:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no authority and I'm not going to argue with you.  Ideogram 15:03, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Clearly the nightmare will never end.
Kindly tone down the melodrama. (How's that for a civil request?) — Hex (❝?!❞) 13:31, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

message: The evidence page says "If something is put in the wrong place, please leave it for the arbitrators to move." Just a reminder. -Barry- 13:43, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "If something is put in the wrong place, please leave it for the arbitrators to move."
Talk:Deus (disambiguation)

message: What a jumble!! Shouldn't this just be on the most important meaning the Latin word for God which is the root of Deism, Pandeism and Panendeism? Shouldn't the rest of them be shunted away to a redirection page?
//// Pacific PanDeist * 05:31, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Jumble"? You are clearly unfamiliar with the concept of disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. -Silence 00:11, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm figuring it out - this was actually the page, Deus, I moved it here from there and made Deus it's own page!! //// Pacific PanDeist * 05:12, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

message: There's a video game called Deus. RocketMaster 13:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video Game
Talk:The Wedding Banquet

message: The article asserts that Chinese Opera performers are always male.  I have not be able to confirm this.  Might there be confusion with Japanese Kabuki, which has some similarities to Chinese Opera, and is only performed by males. --130.207.62.67 (talk) 22:27, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There are many different kinds of Chinese opera, and I'm only familiar with Peking opera and Yue opera; traditionally those were indeed performed only by men, although nowadays women can perform as well. But this point can just be removed from the article, as it's not made explicit in the movie, it's an assumption a Wikipedia editor has made (all that's made explicit in the film is that the characters are making a list of very high demands that they hope no one can fulfill). rʨanaɢ (talk) 00:14, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese Opera 

message: In some places, the name of the protagonist is spelled Wei-Tong, and in others, it's spelled Wai-Tung. I understand that there are multiple ways to spell Chinese names in English, but the same article should not spell the same name in different ways. Does anyone mind if I fix this? Sylvia A (talk) 06:10, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling names