lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cabinda (city)

message: There are numerous photos of Cabinda on Panoramio and in various other places. Really noone wants to donate a picture to Wikipedia? Especially Cabinda's biggest landmark, the Cathedral, has many photos online and we have to have a ship illustrate the city?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.238.153.122 (talk) 10:55, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Nation Radio Wales

message: Given that this article is quite detailed, and the Nation radio one isn't, would it be sensible to merge into one article under the Nation Radio name?? XFM in South Wales only lasted six months. Oxfordmale (talk) 11:59, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: OK, so the station is based in Neath, but it is transmitted from Kilvey Hill in Swansea. We need to resolve the dispute about the broadcast area - what is the normal convention used by the UK Radio task force? - to refer to the location of the studio or the transmitter? Pondle (talk) 09:59, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've contacted a few editors active in WikiProject Radio Stations to request objective comments. Pondle (talk) 23:53, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The way that other articles I have encountered and other websites usually refer to the area where the transmitter (Kilvey Hill in this case) broadcasts to, and you have to ensure that the area that a transmitter serves is a) accurate and b) what most people will be able to understand if they read the article. From this website, Kilvey Hill serves Swansea and the surrounding area, so Swansea area would be correct in my view. As a compromise, you could use "Swansea and Neath area". --tgheretford (talk) 20:47, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the feedback. I've changed it to "Swansea area" - Swansea can serve as a reference for Neath (for example Neath is part of Swansea Urban Area) but vice versa would seem extremely odd. Update: here's a source describing the Nation Radio frequency pertaining to the "Swansea area" Pondle (talk) 12:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute about the broadcast area 

message: The list of presenters should be added to this page because the page is too short and it needs to be made bigger. It also gives details of the shows broadcast on Nation. (talk) 15:08, 09 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Presenters

message: I've added a reference to Nation Radio beginning to be broadcasted in north-east Wales. One of the transmitters on the multiplex will be in Liverpool. Other interested editors might like to watch the thread on DigitalSpy's radio forum. One of the posts there implies that the ultimate transmission area will be further west along the A55 but this is being held up due to the DAB frequency clashing with a TV station in Ireland which might remain on the air until 2015. Rugxulo (talk) 22:31, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  DAB (North Wales) 

message: I have nominated :File:Logo smaller gif2.png for discussion as it may have a dubious non-free use rationale. To discuss this please see this file's entry in Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 April 7. Verbcatcher (talk) 07:04, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Image of 2016 logo
Talk:Cuito Cuanavale

message: This doesn't make sense: "The battle was considered to be the largest military confrontation on African soil since the Battle of Stalingrad in World War II."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:5CF:8000:6B60:782A:4F2E:3810:F8E6 (talk) 19:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. I have removed that and done a bit of copyediting and shuffling while I was there. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:50, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Taveta people

message: This is also described as a first-hand account in the book Marching On Tanga by Frances Brett Young, first published 1917. 89.242.103.68 (talk) 18:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  WW1 clash 
Talk:Malanje

message: Portuguese spelling and English? Matthew_hk tc 22:19, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Malange or Malanje
Talk:Soyo

message: soyo was the name of a political domain in the Kingdom of Kongo. It's ruler was in the late 17th century basically the king maker of Kongo. It also asserted its influence in Kakongo and Ngoyo to the north. John Thornton (historian) spends several pages of his History of West Central Africa to 1850 talking of Soyo the activities of its rulers. I have included some summaries of these things in this article, but am thinking a seperate article would be better.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:02, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we have a seperate article on the larger political domain
Talk:Tômbua

message: The Washington Post has an article about the place and the impact of global warming. Someone may want to include some of the content in this article.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/world/climate-environment/angola-climate-change/?
--Mlewan (talk) 16:09, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Washington Post article November 2019
Talk:Sunrise Radio

message: Didnt they originally operate as an unlicenced FM station an shouldnt the article mention this ? 92.4.228.215 (talk) 20:03, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pirate Heritage 

message: An anonymous user flagged the Background section as POV in July 2012.
The comments that appear to be clearly POV where removed in August 2012.
Since then no further changes have been made
While the station slogan as "greatest Asian station in the world" may be open to debate. It is perfectly accurate to note the use of this slogan - which I believe has been used for a long time. I'd suggest that if a suitable citation can be found to back up the fact that the station has long used this slogan then the POV warning could be removed.
Philedmondsuk (talk) 20:29, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV Dispute 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:04, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:List of hospitals in Tanzania

message: I have organised the list by making subdivisions. However, unfortunately I was not able to add each hospital to a certain region, because I couldn't verify yet in which region they are. Help is welcome! Jennes83 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 19:59, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regions 

message: This is a list of hospitals only. Therefore, specialized clinics or healthcare centres should not be included in this list. I removed clinics and healthcare centres from the list. AssadFin (talk) 09:31, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hospitals 

message: I added a few links to the article.  Should the Regions be listed alphabetically?   I think this might help in the readability.  WP:HOS  -- Talk to G Moore 13:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits
Talk:Dolphin Reef

message: An edit four years ago added biographical details on specific dolphins that I find to be largely inappropriate content for Wikipedia. Aside from being a probably outdated list, it's also unformatted, making for awkward reading, and includes a ton of colloquialisms ("king of the hill", "the ultimate Don Juan"). There's also speculation and assumption as to the animals' thoughts and motivations. We're getting into fanfic territory here. I'm tempted to remove the whole section, but for now will just remove the most egregious parts. If this is a problem, let me know. Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 00:01, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I'm removing all of it. It's unsourced. If someone wants this content here, they should be able to provide the most basic of sources - otherwise it's hearsay about trivia, and that's just silly. Jessicapierce (talk) 00:07, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trimming content
Talk:BOB fm (Hertfordshire)

message: :File:WNPT-FM Jack logo.png was removed from this article because it either does not have a Non-free use rationale or there are problems with the existing rationale. Please see Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria for the applicable policy and Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline for how to fix the problem. If further input or help is needed, questions can be directed towards Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or my talk page. Thank you. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 08:21, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-free file problem
Talk:Pennine FM

message: This list, consisting of non-notable people, is not encyclopaedic. More importantly, being unsourced and, so far as I can see unsourceable, fails WP:V which is policy. Bridgeplayer (talk) 16:37, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of presenters 
Talk:Imagine FM

message: I have changed a recent edit adding an extremely high audience share figure for April 2017. The reference in the article was left as the previous versions to cite RAJAR, the UK "radio ratings" body. It seems that at the end of 2010 Imagine FM no longer subscribe to RAJAR and as such listener figures are no longer published.
I assume the figures given must be based on something else than RAJAR, possibly some station commissioned research. While if such can be referenced it may be worth including in the body of the article, I think that the info box 'share' should only contain the industry accepted RAJAR figures.
Philedmondsuk (talk) 20:11, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Listener Share figure
Talk:Boolean algebra/Archive 1

message: This article is intended as an introduction to Boolean algebra combining minimal prerequisites with maximal clarity.   In view of the many subtopics in Boolean algebra dealing with its models, axioms, computational complexity, relationships to related systems such as propositional calculus and Heyting algebras, etc. it is expected that separate articles on those subtopics will emerge (a number already have), all of which should be able to assume this introduction as a prerequisite.
The introduction should cover the more accessible aspects of Boolean algebra at an elementary level sufficient to give a usable idea of what Boolean algebra is about, with sufficient conceptual clarity and organization to allow the material to be conveyed by the reader to a third party without reference to notes or mindlessly repeating entire sentences.   (Litmus test: does the article's overall conceptualization make it any easier for the reader to explain Boolean algebra at a cocktail party?)
Every subtopic having its own article should be introduced however briefly in the introduction and related to the other subtopics, thereby providing the reader with the list of available subtopics and some preliminary insights into which if any might be sufficiently interesting as to be worth pursuing further.  --Vaughan Pratt (talk) 20:58, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Goal of this article

message: HEY! I can't see the symbols for AND and OR in this article! What's going on?!
I can see the symbols for NOT and the other math symbols ok, but the AND and OR symbols show up as question marks in my browser.
On the other hand, the AND and OR symbols on this discussion page (up and down carets) show up fine... what's going on?
Thanks for any help, thought you'd wanna know that in some browsers your symbols are getting mucked.
76.243.129.217 (talk) 09:13, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: When reporting this behavior, please specify the operating system (Windows 7, Mac OS X 10.6.4, Fedora 12, Ubuntu 10.04, Debian 5.0.5, whatever) and browser (IE8, Firefox 3.6.3, Chrome 5.0.375.70, Opera 10.60, whatever) you're using.  This will be very helpful in diagnosing the problem.  --Vaughan Pratt (talk) 04:58, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's going on???
Talk:Lossberg study

message: I really don't think it's proper to link to a page by Holocaust denier David Irving. I'm removing it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.162.108.158 (talk) 15:59, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Syntegrity

message: josei (talk) 19:35, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference [1]: broken link

message: "Syntegrity", "Syntegration", "Team Syntegrity", and "Team Syntegration" are all registered trademarks. These trademarks were probably created by combining the words "synergy", "integrity", and "integration". Beer might have intended "synthetic" to be part of the word also, as he was a developer of cybernetics.
In fact, term's origin is: 
"Syntegrity is an artificial word made from “synergistic tensegrity".
 
http://www.syntegrity.com/science.html
Second paragraph needs rewrite, source footnote, and link to article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensegrity .
--
Done - needs help properly formatting reference  Paulscrawl (talk) 14:02, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article speculates
Talk:Scleraxis

message: The links under "SCXA" and "SCXB" on first mention appear to be dead. Lumican (talk) 04:47, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead links?

message: I've altered the wording on the proteins translated from the scleraxis genes.  Having had to look at the predicted primary sequences from both of these genes, recently, I've found they're identical.163.1.64.145 (talk) 13:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording modification
Talk:Greatest Hits Radio North East

message: Denies success of outer (relative)
planes.   Is deutschland horrible? 89.243.40.251 (talk) 21:59, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ewoks
Talk:Original 106.5 (Bristol)

message: I propose that this article is renamed to Original 106.5 (Bristol) as that is now the name. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: and so done. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:41, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename article 
Talk:Rashakai

message: Rashakai Swabi Kpk Zahoor YZI (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rashakai Swabi 

message: Village Rashakai Post Office Tarakai Tahseel Razzar Swabi KPK Zahoor YZI (talk) 17:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rashakai Swabi Kpk 

message: Please update thw content of the article 175.107.224.141 (talk) 03:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not enough content
Talk:Michael F. Land

message: This article has been tagged "likeresume", the description of which strongly suggests that the writer of the article has a conflict of interest. I would like to make it clear as the originator of the article I have no connection whatsoever with Professor Land, the University of Sussex, or anything else mentioned in the article. I will rewrite the list sections as prose, if that is the source of the problem. Pterre (talk) 14:05, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The bibliography is too long, and only has recent articles. Richard001 (talk) 22:14, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Please feel free to edit ruthlessly. I added most of the references I came across at the time; I'm not an expert in the field and I've no idea which are of most significance. Pterre (talk) 22:41, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Proud FM

message: This page served as a redirect to Central Radio (Preston), a radio station that formerly used the "Proud FM" monicker (it appears from the article that the station had switched to the Central Radio name by the time it went on the air in 2008), with a hatnote to CIRR-FM, a Canadian station that currently uses the "Proud FM" on-air name.
I have redirected the page to CIRR-FM, primarily due to the fact that the Canadian station still uses the brand name, while the U.K. station does not.  I also did a Google searches of "Proud FM", which came up with the following results:
*A search of www.google.co.uk came up with the following results in the first five pages of search results: 26 references to the Canadian station, 21 references to the U.K. station, and 3 references to other objects.
*A search of www.google.ca came up with the following five pages of search results: all references were to the Canadian station, none to the U.K. station.
*A search of www.google.co.nz (just to try a random non-U.K., non-Cdn. search engine) came up with the following five pages of search results: 40 references to the Canadian station, 6 references to the U.K. station, and 4 references to other subjects.
Although it would appear that there is no primary topic in the U.K., elsewhere it would seem that the Canadian station is the primary topic.  Coupled with the current use of the brand, as well as the Canadian station's claim to notability (first commercial terrestrial LGBT radio station in the world), this page should redirect to CIRR-FM. Skeezix1000 (talk) 19:59, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Hebraic Political Studies

message: I expanded the article with both text and independent sources. I hope it is better this way, so it could stay on WP.Jeff5102 (talk) 15:50, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the notability tag is nonsense. A peer reviewed academic journal with reliable secondary sources about it satisfies the notability guideline. It attracted big-name contributors. A journal does not need to be publishing today to have been notable when it was published. RJC TalkContribs 02:49, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The journal existed only briefly. The coverage is minor in sources that may not even be notable themselves. That "big names" published in it does not make it notable. The tag obviously is not nonsense. --Randykitty (talk) 08:44, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Better?
Talk:The Revolution (radio station)

message: Article need to be reverted to 18 Decemeber 2008 version.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.152.170.55 (talk) 11:18, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

message: This article is unsourced, contains original research and does not denote notability. It also seems someone close to the subject has been editing in breach of WP:COI. Ideally the article should be stubified unless there are sources available to support the current content. Flat Out let's discuss it 01:54, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues with article
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Academic Journals/Scope

message: What should the limits be on the scope? What are the related WikiProjects? Carcharoth (talk) 14:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A list of related projects is at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Academic_Journals#Related_projects, and Wikipedia:WikiProject_Literature#Related_Wikiprojects is another good overview.  Regarding your query on ../, I think we should include Scientific American and the like, at least until another project shows an interest in them.  (A "WikiProject Patents" would be interesting) John Vandenberg (talk) 04:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

text: *See revised scope on the main project page and related talk there. --Crusio (talk) 16:18, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Limits on the scope
Talk:Code page 862

message: Copepage 862 is not obsolete, as the article states. Windows XP systems in Hebrew use copepage 862 natively for NTFS filenames. So do Nokia telephones when writing Hebrew filenames to SD cards.
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
C:\Documents and Settings\Rhe_08>chcp
Active code page: 862
C:\Documents and Settings\Rhe_08>
Dotancohen (talk) 14:30, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not obsolete
Talk:Radio Wave 96.5

message: A10 D4 B8 209.203.45.19 (talk) 22:48, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sms win to 39975
Talk:Wave 105

message: I have just reverted an edit from Save Wave 105 as it appears to be self-promotional from the group itself and there is no references as to who the group is.
 
While it may be justified to note public opposition to the rebrand, we need to find some sources to back this up, especially if language such as "questionable legal plans" is being used.
Philedmondsuk (talk) Philedmondsuk (talk) 09:42, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Save 105
Talk:QF 12-pounder 12 cwt naval gun

message: The image showing "A QF 12-pounder on HMS Daring" is not only very poor, but it's not a 12-lb gun. It's quite clearly a 3-lb Hotchkiss anti-torpedo-boat gun. Look at the sailor: he's standing next to it, and the gun shield is barely over 5ft tall. Compare this to the similar-looking gun shield in the image below: it's between 7-9ft tall. The gun and sailor on the Daring are surrounded by a circular railing, which makes it clear the sailor is standing next to the gun, and it's not a trick of perspective. But most damningly, you can clearly (as clearly as possible, anyway) see the distinctive shoulder-braces, or "stocks" fitted to Hotchkiss guns to make aiming at small fast targets. I may be wrong and it's not a 3lb Hotchkiss, but it's certainly nothing as large as a 12lber QF gun! AnnaGoFast (talk) 00:42, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Daring later carried QF 6-pounder Hotchkisses, not 3-pounders, but you're right, it's not a 12-pounder. Parsecboy (talk) 21:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Image is gone now, but if it was of the forward gun, then it was a 12-pdr. Early 12-pdrs as carried atop TBD conning positions had the stock, as seen also on the 3- and 6-pdr guns of the time. Many photos of 27-knot TBDs show it very clearly and these were boats completed with the 12-pdr. 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:5C45:CB78:D20C:E5D4 (talk) 19:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  That picture doesn't show a QF 12-pounder 

message: I note the opening line designation of the subject denotes it as a "QF 12-pounder 12-cwt gun (Quick-Firing)". Did it actually have "(Quick-Firing)" as part of its designation on top of the standard "QF" or has this been added for clarity? If the latter, surely it should not be in bold type too? 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:5C45:CB78:D20C:E5D4 (talk) 19:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication of designation?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Academic Journals/Images

message: The images are listed on the front page. Should they be placed in a category? What is the best way to keep track of the images we use? Carcharoth (talk) 14:39, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My suggestion would be to tag them (on the talk page) with the code  (without parameters, no need for class=File or class=Image because the file namespace is automatically detected): they'll be filed in the related project category, and a bot is supposed to alert the project if one comes up for deletion. I just tagged like this the icon used by the project's banner, :File talk:1665 phil trans vol i title.png — The Little Blue Frog (ribbit) 18:26, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Organisation
Talk:Yarr Radio

message: The Yarr website is dead and it seems that on some frequencies at least it has been replaced by Punjabi Radio, also part of the Sunrise stable. Is this a simple rebranding exercise (in which case we could move Yarr Radio to Punjabi Radio or is Punjabi a separate organisation meriting its own article? MediaUK are treating it as a rebranding exercise, and Sunrise certainly has form in renaming stations. However the Punjabi website suggests that they were founded in 2006, which contradicts this article. It's on DAB in the West Midlands and Sky 0187, this article is not clear on where Yarr was broadcast. Le Deluge (talk) 20:06, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Yarr replaced by Punjabi Radio?