lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bill Elliott's NASCAR Challenge

message: Is this still a start-class article? --Guroadrunner 13:03, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Upon assessment (two years after asked), I think it meets enough criteria to be a c or b-class article.  The recourses are a little thin, but b-class isn't too much of a stretch.  I won't change the wp:video games box since I'm not part of that project.Mustang6172 (talk) 07:07, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still a start class article? 

message: See this:
http://www.mobygames.com/game/richard-pettys-talladega
This Commodore64 game was released in 1984 and features Richard Petty. Could it be that this was the first game to feature a NASCAR driver?? -- Guroadrunner 02:23, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important information
Talk:Castle of Illusion Starring Mickey Mouse

message: The article states that the Game gear version is identical to the master system version. Whilst they're incredibly close, there are differences between the versions. One difference is that in the toyland stage in the master system, there's a wall you can walk through to get some hidden items, in the GG version, the wall simply doesn't exist. Also, the PAL version of the game on the MS runs slower than the game gear version.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.193.229.185 (talk) 17:32, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game Gear version differences. 

message: --Niemti (talk) 09:34, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to name the remake article? 

message: I propose that Sega Ages: I Love Mickey Mouse be merged into Castle of Illusion Starring Mickey Mouse and QuackShot. The Sega Ages article is only a stub, and the game is merely a combined re-release of the two earlier games, and doesn't really need its own article. --Danjewell (talk) 05:37, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal
Talk:Columns (video game)

message: This article contradicts the Magic Jewelry article. According to the top article, Columns was in 1989 while claiming Magic Jewelry was Column's predecessor. However, the Magic Jewelry article states that it was made in 1990, a year after Columns  -- TheDarkArchon 04:05, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Columns game proper (as created by Jay Geertsen for X Windows and ported to MS-DOS by Nathan Meyers) is from 1989. The Sega version was released 1990-06-30, as stated in the sidebar. It is therefore entirely possible that Magic Jewelry was released before Sega Columns. -- 213.47.127.75 09:01, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction

message: Topic, was there ever a Columns 2?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.206.124.190 (talk) 11:06, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Arcade only, though. It's full name is "Columns II: The Voyage Through Time". AdamantBMage (talk) 07:32, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to Columns 2? 

message: Digital Eel's Big Box of Blox is a Columns clone with some twists (that can be toggled), unsure how remarkable it is.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.173.12.68 (talk) 13:10, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital Eel's Big Box of Blox?
Talk:Cyberball

message: With all due respect, it would be wise to properly verify a proposed change to an article before committing.  The "onside kick" was indeed a bug present in the original Cyberball that was removed in the Tournament version, and was specifically mentioned in the article as the most notable bugfix between versions. Sangrito 13:58, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

message: See . Equinox (talk) 15:09, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also a game used in scientific studies
Talk:Dragon Quest IV

message: Is there any reason that some characters names include localizations (such as that Torneko is localized as Taloon) while others do not (such as Maya and Meena not being mentioned as localized to Mara and Nara)?  TheDonny (talk) 05:11, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name localizations 

message: May I nominate this article for GA, anyone who contributed or watches this article? I would help guide it through the process! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:43, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: GA nomination
Talk:Dragon Saber

message: Just an FYI, I will be reworking this article to fix its stub-like current nature. For reference on my past work in video game article creation/reworkings, please see The Amazing Spider-Man (Game Boy), Gargoyle's Quest, and Dead Moon (game). --MOE.RON talk | done | doing 15:43, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reworking
Talk:DragonStrike (video game)

message: I've played the NES port. It is rather unique for a shoot 'em up and doesn't fall into any traditional category. The dragon has two altitude levels that it can change between to attack different targets. More importantly, the dragon can be turned completely around so that the direction of flight is not necessarily up (like an RC car), although the levels seem to end at the top.--SkiDragon (talk) 23:32, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:DuckTales: The Quest for Gold

message: I can remember the flying saucer from when I played this as a kid - I was on a DOS PC though.  It was pretty rare to see...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.97.250.138 (talk) 02:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flying Saucer 

message: I remember the flight sequences being very similar to Sopwith (computer game). Can someone verify this? --Abdull (talk) 07:35, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sopwith 

message: The following has been removed from this page: 
==Trivia==
*The contest between Scrooge and Glomgold is reminiscent of the one they had in the Firefly Fruit Contest four-parter from the series. Although the contest on the show was held by the Grand Kishke of the Island of Macaroon, in this game, it is being run by Dime Magazine. However, at the end of the game, Scrooge and Glomgold do weigh their fortunes on giant scales on the Island of Macaroon, and the player can make a trip there to drop off their acquired treasure for safekeeping.
*Many of the locations and treasures featured in the game have been taken directly from specific episodes of the television show. Examples include the locales of Montedumas and Swansylvania, which originate from the episodes The Duck in the Iron Mask and Ducky Horror Picture Show respectively. Examples of treasures include Drakesphere's lost play from the episode Much Ado About Scrooge and the pearl of wisdom from the episode of the same name.
*One of the game's treasures is Bombastium. If you manage to obtain it, Gyro will use it to build a matter transporter that can transport you to any location from Scrooge's office instantly, although it may malfunction and send the player somewhere else from time to time.
*Fenton Crackshell has a small cameo in this game as Scrooge's accountant. Although he appears, he doesn't appear to actually do anything aside from reminding the player to stop swimming in the vault and continue on with the game. Additionally, Fenton wears a blue jacket in this game, even though he wears a purple one on the show. Gizmoduck is nowhere to be found.
*In at least the Amiga version of the game, a flying saucer can rarely be seen during the flight sequence. The condition which triggers the event is not known.
*The DOS game features copy protection in the form of a unique password system. When the game is booted up, you must use a key script (located in the game manual) to translate symbols on the screen. If you fail, you are identified to the game as a Beagle Boy invader, and it will send the user back to the DOS prompt to try again, and there is no way to play the game without deciphering the code.
I would like the Duck Tale's editors opinion of these deletions. Ikip (talk) 21:23, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The trivia is fine to be removed.  What makes people think that this kind of stuff belongs in an encyclopedia formatted like that is beyond me.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of material from this page
Talk:Flood (video game)

message: The box art says "Free" something... what was free with the game? A poster or something? Hollowaynz (talk) 12:14, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Free poster inside". --Mika1h (talk) 23:03, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Free ?

message: "The total number of levels is 42, which is coincidentally the Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything." If it's a coincidence, then it's relevant how? --Elmyr (talk) 23:26, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: The character finally exits the sewers and gets run over  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2404:440C:17A6:D000:BCD3:C313:47EF:F3E (talk) 04:32, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  End of the game
Talk:Fountain of Dreams

message: it's also a stage in "Super Smash Bros. Melee" and "Super Smash Bros. Brawl". 79.78.194.42 (talk) 12:46, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's Kirby's "Fountain of Dreams". It's a bit different. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 01:54, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  SSBM 
Talk:Ahmad Sohrab

message: I just threw a bunch of stuff in here.  Please help add and cleanup.  Thanks. Wjhonson 07:53, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: It's interesting these newspaper articles I'm finding on Sohrab, are pushing back the beginning of his "notable period" you might say.  Here is one which gives us a slew of people to check for to see if they were *somebody* or not.  Personally, at the moment I don't recognize any of them, but who knows.  I didn't know who Chanler was until I looked. Wjhonson 03:55, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Washington Post 

message: Ahmad Sohrab was a Bahá'í.  On March 31, 1941, the New York Supreme Court dismissed a court case brought by National Spiritual Assembly and Trustees of the Bahá'ís of the United States and Canada against Mirza Ahmad Sohrab for the use of the word "Bahá'í."  The judge granted a motion to dismiss, stating that "the plaintiffs have no right to a monopoly of the name of a religion. The defendants, who purport to be members of the same religion, have an equal right to use the name of the religion..."http://bahai-library.com/sohrab_vs_us-nsa_1941
Regards, A35821361 (talk) 17:26, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I happen to agree, and that is not relevant to the material being deleted. The label "Free Baha'i" is a modern invention that posthumously chose to confer membership to Sohrab. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 22:59, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ahmad Sohrab was a Bahá'í.
Talk:Gaiares

message: I thought Gaiares was from Gaia and Ares, both gods.  Was it determined this was wrong? 142.167.79.161 (talk) 09:45, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: What happened to all the screenshots?  Why are we limited to just the picture of the box?  It's one thing to delete a pic, is another to delete everything.  Starze 06:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pics
Talk:Gargoyle's Quest

message: An anonymous user has added a link to this site a number of times, and it has been removed each time (I'm assuming because that user was spamming the link). However, I would argue that it's probably worth keeping. Although it's primarily focused on the Ghosts 'N Goblins series, Gargoyle's Quest is also covered in a decent amount of detail. Perhaps we should just link to the Gargoyle's Quest page there. Any arguments against? -Jacquismo 01:53, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of The Ghoul Realm

message: Someone really should add the European release date of this game to the article.  I'd do it myself, if only I still remembered. Kalamrir (talk) 13:43, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: European release date(s)
Talk:Hard Nova

message: The last sentence is biased towards feminism. How should it be rewritten? 17:49, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I altered the sentence a bit and removed the NPOV tag; feel free to revert or write a better solution in. SethHall (T/C) 06:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Hatris

message: I just want to add, Alexey and Vladimir aren't "a pair of benevolent, bearded midgets". They're the developers of the game. They inserted themselves for fun. It's explained in the instruction manual I believe.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.190.155.145 (talk) 05:43, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

message: All literature, such as the NES game title screen, manuals for the NES and Japanese PC versions, and magazine adverts and reviews, all state that the developer, trademark and copyright for the game lies with ParaGraph Intl. and it is only licensed to Bullet-Proof Software.  —Flicky1984 (talk) 20:07, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Developer
Talk:Journey to Silius

message: Listening to the music from the first stage on a .nsf player.  Gotta say, it's even better than a lot of SNES music.
Vechs (talk) 07:13, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

message: Hey, is the bit about the soundtrack really all anyone can find about the game's reception? I'm too busy with other real-life stuff to do much dedicated research and am also too much of a Wikipedia newbie to feel particularly comfortable adding it at this point in time, so please chime in if you can find anything. Otherwise I'll see if I can dig anything up at some future point. Ping me back in a few months if I forget about this.
Also, I'm not entirely sure the OverLooked ReMiX project is relevant enough to warrant a mention on here. Is it mildly interesting? Yes. Historically relevant? Maybe not. Opinions? NinjaPenguinDan (talk) 06:27, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception
Talk:Penguin Wars

message: If the game was called "Penguin Wars" in North America and "Penguin-kun Wars Vs." in Japan, where was it called "King of the Zoo"?  Shouldn't it be moved to "Penguin Wars"? Dpv 22:43, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Penguin Wars 

message: As far as I know, penguin wars was previously made (than in Gameboy) to other platforms, like MSX. (MSX ver is also a much better version than gameboy) Someone should add something like this in article. SSPecter ☎|✉ ♠ 20:49, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other platforms 

message: This appears to have been a clone of a 1980s arcade game named Penguin-Kun Wars. 2fort5r (talk) 15:27, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arcade
Talk:LHX Attack Chopper

message: Now I played this game a lot as a kid... and I can say this is all true.  But is there anyway we can find some sources?  (I wish I could be the source, I LOVED this game!) GormnT (talk) 03:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need Sources
Talk:Menace Beach

message: Wisdom Tree produced strictly Christian themed games. This was not one. This was produced by Color Dreams, the company that eventually became Wisdom Tree. I am changing the Producer and Developer to Color Dreams. Ryratt 07:38, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wisdom Tree vs. Color Dreams 

message: Since both games are virtually identical save for the storyline and some minor graphical changes, there needn't be two separate articles. Sunday Funday should be merged into Menace Beach since the latter was developed earlier and more widely released. --Jtalledo (talk) 20:37, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Sunday Funday]] 
Talk:Midnight Rescue!

message: Is this a Windows or DOS game? 2fort5r (talk) 15:41, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Old question, but it's both. There was a DOS version, a Mac version, and a later Windows touch-up; some other Super Solvers games got this treatment (Treasure MathStorm! for example). Despatche (talk) 00:27, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Ninja Gaiden II: The Dark Sword of Chaos

message: I noticed that this article has been tagged for having a plot summary that is way too long. I would like to help correct this.  All I ask is that someone review my revision to ensure that it doesn't suck.  I'll get started right away. Larrythefunkyferret 06:05, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Plot Summary 

message: Just having watched it on YouTube (I'm too lazy to play the game all the way through and beat it to see the ending.), and, unlike the first Ninja Gaiden game, the sun sets right before it fades to the credits. I even got that messed up when I first rebuilt the article :) –MuZemike 01:05, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The sun sets in the ending 

message: I found this: Electronic Gaming Monthly review. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 04:40, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, Ref #26 is where I have that review referenced; I have the entire issue of that magazine available. –MuZemike 06:15, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference material 

message: Ninja Gaiden '88 was take place fifteen years after the events Ninja Gaiden II: The Dark Sword of Chaos. 2001:48F8:300B:3DB:D731:1600:3045:D274 (talk) 09:02, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comic book continuity
Talk:Operation Neptune (video game)

message: The article is good, but it contains a major plot spoiler at the end and an incorrect reference to gameplay (the game does not occur in undersea caverns, but along various locations in ocean reefs and ocean trenches.) I've fixed it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.153.65.36 (talk) 16:42, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:German submarine U-2513

message: The article states that Harry Truman became the first American President to travel on a submarine when he visited U-2513 on 5 December 1947. I thought Theodore Roosevelt was the first American President to travel on a submarine off Long Island Sound aboard USS Plunger (SS 2) on 25 March 1905.  http://www.submarine-history.com/NOVAtwo.htm 98.240.51.222 (talk) 19:05, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The claim that Truman was the first president to travel in a submarine is supported by the cited source, a newspaper article. But then, the newspaper didn't have Wikipedia to use for fact checking. -- Donald Albury 22:06, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  First American President to travel on a submarine
Talk:German submarine U-2511

message: This page had a Reference to German Maritime Museum Website.
http://www.dsm.de/Pubs/23_12.htm
Listed under External Links. This link went dead sometime between Feb & Sept 2007. Hence any text referencing it can not be maintained. For now I have copied the text from the reference Page onto this page. 
I request a senior Editor to look into this issue so we can put the issue to rest.
Secondly, There is an Excerpt from C.D. Bekker's Book Kampf und Untergang der Kriegsmarine available. Published Düsseldorf, 1953.
http://www.ww2f.com/atlantic-naval-conflict/13892-new-u-boats.html
According to this Excerpt, Korvettenkapitän Schnee deposed to the Royal Navy Commission in Bergen aboard HMS Norfolk. During this deposition, he is said to have requested a comparison of Norfolk's Ship's Log to that of the U-2511. The comparison is said to have revealed that the Cruiser indeed was at that position making the recorded speed as per the Sub's Log.perseus71 (talk) 20:34, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Norfolk Controversy 

message: If a link goes dead, it can still be found via web archive.  Look here.  I will paste the text.
Reinhard Hoheisel-Huxmann
Der Fronteinsatz des Ubootes U 2511 – Wirkliche Dichtung?
Deutsches Schiffahrtsarchiv (DSA) 23, 2000, S. 347-372
Article printed in German, with English and French summaries, 4 ill.
Abstract
The submarine U 2511 in action at the front: A real myth?
After World War II, a widely circulated rumour claimed that the type-XXI submarine U 2511 had made a blind attack on the British cruiser NORFOLK during the final phase of the war. An investigation carried out in 1998 came to the conclusion that, on the basis of the spatiotemporal data, this episode was impossible and therefore a myth.
The article begins with a critical look at the basic information supplied by the various sources, as well as at the arguments that led to the verdict passed by the 1998 study. The focus then turns to the description of a scenario in which the known data are summarised in a logically conceivable set of proceedings. The scenario is not a historical reconstruction of the event but a concrete model of what would have been spatiotemporally plausible according to the data.
The results clearly indicate that there is no sufficient or solid basis for concluding that the encounter between the U 2511 and the NORFOLK was a mere invention. 
Author's addresses:
Dipl.-Geogr. Reinhard Hoheisel-Huxmann · Deutsches Schiffahrtsmuseum · Hans-Scharoun-Platz 1 · D-27568 Bremerhaven · Germany  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.14.11.254 (talk) 02:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference to link that went dead
Talk:Fort Abraham Lincoln

message: I realize that this article is currently part of a school project, but I think it would be good for me to remind the students and instructor working on this project that articles should not contain an excessive amount of material which is only of interest to readers in the present or near future. Wikipedia articles should be written in such a manner so that they wouldn't sound outdated to a reader a year or two from now. The article currently has material about upcoming events at the park. This type of material is best left out of an article. Think of it this way, if you looked this state park up in a regular encyclopedia, would you expect to see a list of upcoming events at the park? It is best to include only material that is of a lasting interest to the reader. By the way, I've made a couple of minor changes to the article to bring it back in line with the usual format of an article. --MatthewUND(talk) 00:04, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, this is a good reminder. Feel free to chime in in the "workshop" section at User talk:1013-whittney if you have more guidance for students. 1013-josh 00:08, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it would best best to actually remove this section in its entirety. --MatthewUND(talk) 23:21, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm curious why the "Events in 2007" section remained in place even after the problems with it were brought up? This section is unencyclopedic and is out of place in a Wikipedia article. --MatthewUND(talk) 00:27, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whittney, your thoughts? Matthew, feel free to be bold and remove it. 1013-josh 02:00, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timely information 
Talk:Powermonger

message: Corrected slight mistake in rotation in the first para. It was possible to rotate in small intervals. Queex 10:04, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In mentioned in [1] commercial, there is a state "from 1991" - it does not mean that it was released in 1991. In DOS game there are two dates "Copyright 1990, 1992". In many sources there is "1992" as release date of DOS version. Please, verify correct date of PC release. Thanks. 2A02:A319:C142:9A80:5C80:57B3:A52F:C23B (talk) 14:53, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date of PC version