Talk:Americans for Limited Government

message: hi! because i'm studying land use initiatives and related legal battles, i'm interested in 'americans for limited government' and the inititaive its supports. while i agree that to organization is very conserative, i don't think it's fair to call it 'a far right' organization in the first line of the entry. better to objectively describe the debates that have arisen around ALG's activities than to begin with such a loaded phrase.Benzocane 17:24, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is obviously highly controversial policy and midwestmax is right to note that. But you can't just say contested policy has been a disaster (I recognizie midwestmax is new to this community: see NPOV tutorial). I have removed the more inflammatory rhetoric from the description and added the pro-TABOR view. Let's make this a strong, balanced entry!Benzocane 20:45, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No need to apologize. I'm studying these issues closely for a seminar I'm teaching and finding the NPOV is always tough. But I think this article is on its way... Thanks for doing your part.Benzocane 21:02, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to disagree. Supporters of ALG would admit it's been a source of ongoing controversy. The description of that controversy seems seems objective to me. Benzocane 16:25, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: TABOR

message: Stop OverSpending is also being considered in Nebraska for 2006, yet this article mentions nothing of it.  In this case, ALG is the co-sponsor for SOS Nebraska.  Things that this article should include are its affiliation with National Voter Outreach, and criticism.  For example, how Nebraska's own Secretary of State was approached by an underage 15 year old circulator, how ALG was able to get away with violating private commercial property owners' Fourteenth Amendment rights by petitioning in front of big-box stores, how ALG threatened to sue radio stations for merely airing anti-SOS ads, ALG and NVO received criticism because of the shady people that it hired to circulate this, like this nice 41 year old petition circulator from Florida that got arrested in Lincoln for punching a 20 year old university student, etc.  Oh, and let's not forget ALG's point of view.  Tuxide 04:17, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion, Stop OverSpending Nebraska

message: I reverted the recent changes by Rlorenc.  Rlorenc cut about half the article's content, including what seems like important material, without offering any justification or starting any discussion with the editors whose hard work has built the entry.  Object to specifics and offer solutions, don't just cut other editor's contributions unilaterally. Legosoldier 17:26, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a Controversy section as suggested, and grouped some of the general controversies there. Since there are no specific challenges to the neutrality of the article on the Talk page, I'm going to remove the flag on the main page as well. -Pete 04:44, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert Decision

message: The information in the article about the board of directors is three years old.  Any reason to think that is still accurate? Jkought2 (talk) 15:31, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea to add the tag; information should definitely be updated; will try to do when I get the chance. I've been working on an article about a related topic so I may have more information in a bit.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:35, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The wording of the section is that these are notable people who have served on the board, not that it is the current board. If a current list is found it should be added to the existing list, but the old list should not be deleted.   Will Beback  talk   19:23, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Americans for Limited Government. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303233408/http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?C90011883 to http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?C90011883
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified