lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:José Antonio Reyes

message: Reyes is a left winger now for club & country. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.149.129.3 (talk • contribs) 
Reyes was actually born in Utrera and not Seville —Preceding unsigned comment added by LiquidSwords (talk • contribs) 
Utrera is in Seville province —Preceding unsigned comment added by Burgas00 (talk • contribs) 
: Right. Utrera is a town in the province of Seville. The capital of the province of Seville is the city of Seville.
Should the FA Cup 2004/5 be included amongst honours won when red carded players do not receive medals?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.18.76.52 (talk) 22:44, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk

message: He has not yet moved to Real Madrid 
:Apparently they have agree with Real Madrid  --No.13 13:37, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transfer 

message: More needs to be said about his time at Sevilla at the beginning of his career. Inexplicably, it isn't even mentioned in the section titled "early career". -Estesark (talk) 10:48, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balance of article 

message: It's sourced now and doesn't need removing Spiderone (talk) 16:43, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gitano
Talk:Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union

message: The KPSU never bore the name Communist Party of Soviet Union (Bolshevik). No historical source confirms the claim that on 17th party congress was any name change. -- Vít Zvánovec 15:59, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I also see this delirium. During the WWII the party's name was ВКП(б).--Nixer 18:19, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Communist Party of Soviet Union (Bolshevik)

message: What was the difference between Party congresses and Party conferences? Do we have a list of the latter on WP? Drutt (talk) 17:37, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a list of them in Russian Wikipedia: :ru:Конференция КПСС. --Martynas Patasius (talk) 23:02, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Conferences
Talk:Chang (surname)

message: There is a proposal to create a precedent that names are not encyclopedic. Articles about names regularly show up on various deletion pages and are summarily deleted. Perhaps - since you've been working on an article about a name, you hold a different opinion that you'd like to express.  Please do: Wikipedia:Deletion policy/names and surnames SchmuckyTheCat 17:05, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some thoughts on this article, which now seems likely to be kept:
*Let's put a list of people known in English by the name "Chang" (whichever one) in Chang, at the bottom.
*Should we make this page a disambiguation page for the different surnames spelled "Chang"?  (If so, why not merge it into Chang?)
**Should articles/sections on specific surnames be put here, when/if created?  If so, which ones should go here and which should be filed under Jang or Zhang? -- Visviva 12:52, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorting out 

message: This article was recently nominated for deletion but kept by default of no consensus being reached.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Chang (surname) for the archived discussion. -- Francs2000 | Talk  11:26, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  VfD discussion 
Talk:Child prostitution

message: The sections about child prostitution in various countries ought to be removed due to being mostly redundant (there is already a table with statistics) and miscellaneous trivia, much of which lacks citation. As there are already separate articles about child prostitution by country, and adding incomplete portraits of country by country info only makes this article look disorderly, it is unnecessary to include this information here (none of which was part of the article when it became a GA). --Maryam.Rosie (talk) 18:52, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Prevalence

message: There is no such thing under federal law as a "child prostitute". This should be merged with child trafficking. 24.236.197.234 (talk) 03:59, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: "federal law" What does German federal law have to do with the topic? Dimadick (talk) 10:04, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:The Citadel

message: it's noted that Conroy's depiction of life in the institution was regarded as 'highly unflattering' - but was it considered unfair or exaggerated? I think that's what matters here. Notreallydavid (talk) 00:06, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Lords of Discipline 

message: The ring ceremony for fist class cadets and veteran day students was returned to the Chapel in 2022. 143.147.49.213 (talk) 15:13, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ring Ceremony Location
Talk:List of Schedule 1 substances (CWC)

message: This article has been on VfD and kept. Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of Schedule 1 substances (CWC). Sjakkalle 06:50, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Anarchism and anarcho-capitalism

message: This article was written (or compiled from other articles?) when WP was young and very different—mainly, we are significantly stricter with sources now, and do not use random websites. This article is written like an essay, with few verifiable citations to secondary sources, and would need to be rebuilt from the ground up. In reading what I have, I think it makes far more sense to instead expand on criticisms of anarcho-capitalism and vice versa in the relevant sections of their dedicated articles. Only when there is enough material, we can expand summary style to encompass what can be said and, more importantly, sourced about the debate.  czar 23:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite or merge
Talk:K Video Compression Dynamics

message: The following comment was originally posted directly into the article by a user at 204.52.215.118.  The link in question is http://www.tus-kvcd-group.com/forum/ -- Davnor 13:17, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to "The Usual Suspects" 

message: This is very confusing and unclear. The text is ripped directly from http://www.kvcd.net/portal/index.php
I still don't understand what KVCD is nor its advantages. The existing text sounds like an ad with lots of exaggerations.
Response:
Despite the fact that the technical specification may sound like an ad, it is an accurate, if overly technical, description of what KVCD is. There are no exaggerations. For the lay person, KVCD is a version of the existing MPEG 1 and MPEG 2 video compression codecs with modifications on how the data is "organized" and "arranged" (handwaving explanation). KVCD's major advantage is that it can achieve high compression ratios without losing much video quality. The downside is that it is not an industry-recognized standard, and so may not be supported everywhere.
Would it be possible to add a link to a player compatibility list? 216.229.91.244 06:31, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments from July 2006 

message: The KVCD article is hardly more than a stub, restating what XVCD is, and that KVCD is a variant, with a particular quantization table, and sometimes using a higher resolution.  A fairly short (but larger than it currently is) mention of KVCD in the Video CD article (under the XVCD section) should explain KVCD well enough.  Support?  Suggestions?  Objections?  I'll wait at least a couple weeks.  Rcooley (talk) 09:40, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:List of Islamic texts

message: Good start, IFaqeer! Zora 17:43, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't take all credit; the thinking behind it came from an outline Grenavitar (talk • contribs) had on his (her?) page as a To Do item for a while. I took that and expanded it.—iFaqeer (Talk to me!) 19:41, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
NIce work guys . but Gospel of Barnabas ?? I know its relevence with islamic view of Jesus ... but then ... dont U think its not a part of Islamic texts Farhansher 21:10, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

text: I admit I know nothing of the text, but on the wiki page for Gospel of Barnabas it seems to imply, under the Islamic perspective section, that some scholars deem it authentic. Perhaps apocrypha is not the best title. Am I misunderstanding the page's explanation? freestylefrappe 00:35, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Strut

message: Does that part near the end, about mounting points near the middle, make sense to anybody? I left it in though I'm not sure. Gzuckier 18:18, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense to me, but then I think I might have written it...  --SFoskett 22:15, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
Hi none of this makes sense—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.173.141.114 (talk) 22:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree.   But if it is to be clarified, the job needs to be done by someone who reckons they know just what it intends to mean: I don't.  So for now I have left it.   But if it hasn't been clarified in a couple of weeks, I suggest someone - maybe you - removes it.   Or - if you have a sufficient understanding of the matter - at least reword it so that it says something useful.    Regards Charles01 (talk) 08:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

message: Does anyone else think the picture of automotive struts makes no sense alongside the paragraph? The text exclusively refers to the struts that are part of the shock absorbing package that attach to the wheels, but the picture showcases the parts of the body that hold the roof above the passengers. Maybe those are also technically struts, but it doesn't help demonstrate the paragraph text at all, to me. Brady (talk) 07:27, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  I have removed it --64.118.218.140 (talk) 18:44, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Automotive pillars/posts image

message: Hello all, 
I made a numerous amount of edits on the automotive portion of this page. I wanted to include the history of why struts became to be. I felt the history helps the reader understand progressively more information about the function of the struts that was outlined previously in the heading. I wanted to also include a portion on how some vehicles have the option of not using struts which connects to the progression of the past history. I also wanted to cater some information to the importance on maintaining the struts and a simple troubleshooting method. I would love for people to expand more on my edits and make this page increasingly help the reader understand the concept even more. I feel like my edits will help the audience understand more about automotive struts overall. 
Sincerely,    
ChipperJonesFan37 (talk) 01:15, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits Made On 2/13/2020
Talk:Vulpecula

message: I've removed cat Astronomy from this article since the Constellation category is already a member (eventually). Ian Cairns 19:19, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cat

message: Sources differ on how many square degrees: some say 268 and some say 278.  I have made the change to 268, because more sources say 268 (especially if you exclude Wikipedia mirrors), and also some sources that say 268 give higher precision: 268.2 or 268.165.
The only way to know for sure would be to look up Delporte's exact 1930 boundaries and do the calculation using spherical trigonometry. -- Curps 18:39, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, there's another way to be reasonably confident of the result: the total area of the sky is 4π steradians, or 4π × (180/π)2 = 41252.961 square degrees.  The total areas of all 88 constellations have to add up to this. Putting the information from List of constellations by area into a spreadsheet, we get the right result if the area for Vulpecula is 268 degrees, not 278 degrees. -- Curps 19:20, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Area

message: Where does the figure for the distance come from? According to the Bright Star Catalogue Alpha Vul's parallax is 0.014" which translates into 233 light years. I won't change it for now but would like to know the source of the existing value. --Kalsermar 16:06, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously Hipparcos. The BSC values are long out of date. Skeptic2 (talk) 22:37, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distance 

message: May I suggest a disambiguation page, for people looking for information on the Trichosurus vulpecula?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.239.32.109 (talk) 14:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation? 

message: The page states that NGC 7052 is an edge-on spiral galaxy, it is really an elliptical.
108.18.181.48 (talk) 20:40, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  NGC 7052 is an elliptical galaxy
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Libraries

message: I have nominated Digital media use and mental health for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:06, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAR for Digital media use and mental health 

message: Hi I am refining content on Wikidata about sound archives, I have drafted this navigation template Draft:Sounds Archives for enwikipedia. Before I add some red links, please change it further. Alexmar983 (talk) 09:52, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved it to the teplate namespace, not inserted.--Alexmar983 (talk) 09:14, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  It seems it was refined, since there is no opposition and it's not controversial, I am going to insert it.--Alexmar983 (talk) 17:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I am inserting it. I continue tomorrow.--Alexmar983 (talk) 02:20, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Navigation template about sound archives

message: Hi all
I just finished an article for a young Indian librarian, Muskan Ahirwar. I would really appreciate some help in improving the article, especially any additional information and formatting. 
Thanks very much
John Cummings (talk) 06:23, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Muskan Ahirwar]] 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Muhammad Khatami#Requested move 6 January 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 01:11, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Muhammad Khatami#Requested move 6 January 2023]] 

message: I have just posted on the talk page of the article List of libraries in Australia in the hopes of input from other Wikipedian's regarding the list's current cluttered state. Please have a look and give your thoughts on the topic :) -- NotCharizard 🗨 03:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cluttered list
Talk:Duden

message: I removed the following sentence, which 169.200.215.17 (welcome, by the way!) put in after the first sentence in the opening paragraph:
:Its English-language equivalent would be the Oxford English Dictionary (OED).
I can think of a number of good reasons why this comparison ought to be here (for example, it means that the Duden is very important), but I can think of even more reasons why the comparison is misleading. For example, the history of the normative status of Duden orthography is unique. Also, the Rechtschreibduden can be found in pretty much every home and office in Germany, while the OED is a rarer sight in the UK. Moreover, the structuring of the Duden into volumes is completely different from the OED's. Etc.
Maybe we can find a healthy comparison that is equally good at explaining Duden's significance (if that was 169.200.215.17's aim), without simultaneously suggesting misleading equivalances to OED? Arbor 19:51, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Duden = OED?

message: I see that both the English and German entries for Duden call it a dictionary. I'm not sure if I would refer to the 12-volume series as a "dictionary", because the series is essentially a comprehensive reference for the German language, and also because Duden has dictionaries, such as the Universalwörterbuch. 
Translated, Wörterbuch is a dictionary, and there are no fewer than seven Wörterbücher in the Duden series, not including Volume 1 Rechtschreibung which really is a dictionary as well.  It seems awkward to me to have a dictionary contain sub-dictionaries when each stands on their own as a reference work in and of itself.
Duden's web site does not refer to the Duden as a dictionary, but rather a series, die Reihe Duden.
Anyone have any thoughts, or care?  I would like to see this entry refer to the Duden as a 12-volume German language reference work.
Michael Poplawski (talk) 21:35, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Is Duden a dictionary, or something else?
Talk:The Housemartins

message: This song deserves some emphasys, being by far their most recognizable work, doesn't it? Luis Dantas 05:43, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Build"

message: "The Housemartins' lyrics were an odd mixture of Marxist politics and Christianity, reflecting Paul Heaton's beliefs at the time."
Reductive in the extreme - or, to put it another way, crap. Most of the Housemartins lyrics were social observations not a million miles removed from those of ray Davies or even Randy Newman... as a matter of fact I can't think of a single Housemartins song that is particularly Christian or Marxist, although these were the groups beliefs. The political commentary in the songs, apart from the republicanism, is broadly left wing in a way that wasn't particularly identifiably Marxist during the polarised Thatcher/Scargill era. A lot of it reads like the post-Punk socialist anarchism of Class War.
Well, the sleeve notes did say "Take Jesus, Take Marx, Take Hope" - so it seems fair enough to me.
What is it with the song " Five Get Overexcited " having a gay subtext in it ? 129.102.254.253 (talk) 18:30, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lyrics

message: Why the Fatboy Slim discography at the end? This is a The Housemartins page.
:It is a template located at the bottom of every Fatboy Slim related page. Foetusized (talk) 02:36, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fatboy Slim Discography

message: Does anyone actually believe that The Housemartins were an indie rock band, and have sources to prove it? There has been a genre warrior adding multiple genres to this article and the Build (song) article for a while now, so let's see if there is any consensus for keeping any of those genres in the article. --Michig (talk) 06:10, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thought not. --Michig (talk) 06:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

text: No support from me for these extra genres.  Just reverted the IP genre warrior once again -- Foetusized (talk) 14:13, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

text: It can be shown that The Housemartins belongs to several genres such as Jangle Pop or Indie rock, which are and are alternative rock styles. - levimedina-  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Levimedina (talk • contribs) 02:05, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: So show it using reliable sources. --Michig (talk) 06:02, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genres 
Talk:Chapman strut

message: I used the mcpherson strut picture. what the heck.Gzuckier 20:06, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: http://www.ridgeap.com/tips/macpherson_struts1_2.htm mentions the difference between the MacPherson and Chapman struts.  It would be nice to think that there was a public domain pic out there of a real Lotus with a real Chapman strut.   (comment by ip addr: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/131.252.209.128)
Listen, I found the difference between McPherson and Chapman struts a bit confusing - unless you mean that the McPherson allows the wheel to SWIVEL (as required by the steering)?  I really was puzzled by the idea of the strut rotating.  Or have I got this completely wrong?  (If I haven't may I plead with you to change rotate to swivel?) Edetic (talk) 18:58, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

message: The image shown is for a front passenger side wheel in countries that drive on the right hand side of the road.  In the US, automotive parts are referred to in the industry as viewed from the driver seat, so the image of the strut is for the front right wheel, as the strut is on the left/inside of the wheel.  Body panels, seats, tires, etc are most often called left /driver's side, or right/passenger side to distinguish exactly which part is needed.
It appears the image was called "Left Front" from the perspective of somebody standing in front of the vehicle, which is incorrect notation.  If the image is of a rear strut, which is possible due to the description, then it would be a left rear strut.  
The differences of the MacPherson strut also need clarification, here an animation may be in order, though I do not have the skills/software for such.
8r455 (talk) 05:34, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Front Left Strut?
Talk:Martin Bashir

message: In response, Bashir and his personal cameraman released a rebuttal interview
Is this right? Who released a rebuttal interview?Createangelos (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: A pathetic attempt to preserve a positive image for a disgraced journalist who should be prosecuted for fraud and other crimes. RSR, DBA (talk) 23:23, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Amen he is a scumbag who deserves to be prosecuted and sentenced to jail 2600:1700:BCD0:2E30:C147:2BF5:61EB:5E9A (talk) 16:53, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo? 

message: In response, Jackson and his personal cameraman released a rebuttal interview, which showed Bashir complimenting Jackson for the "spiritual" quality of the Neverland Ranch.
Shouldn't that be ,"In response, Bashir..."? 2601:147:8280:DF20:7C14:EB51:FD46:EB94 (talk) 23:19, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Like create Angelo's said, typo?