lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Theresa of Portugal, Countess of Flanders

message: Teresa was Countess consort of Flanders until the death of her first husband. Then she was Duchess consort of Burgundy until her second husband repudiated her. 
Because Duchess of Burgundy is technically superior to Countess of Flanders, do you think we should move the article to Infanta Teresa, Duchess of Burgundy? Joaopais 04:02, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of Portuguese monarchs which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RFC bot 21:31, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in process
Talk:Denis, Lord of Cifuentes

message: I'm not even remotely certain what this means, and the topic is not brought up in the Portuguese Wiki article, so I have no reference point:
:"Considering Denis an Infante of Portugal is a debatable subject. Some historians consider him a natural son of Peter I, so the title Infante of Portugal could never be attributed to him. Other opinions refer that after the death of Inês de Castro, ordered by Pedro's father King Afonso IV of Portugal, the Prince after inheriting the throne admitted that he had married Inês secretly, and because of that she was a lawful Queen of Portugal." •Jim62sch• 13:54, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: huh?
Talk:Enzyme catalysis

message: Would this mention belong better in the acid/base catalysis section? I wouldnt know.... - Zephyris Talk 00:16, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No it is a form of covalent catalysis, despite the name, and is in the correct section. TimVickers 00:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Schiff base catalysis

message: In the section about induced fit catalysis care should be taken to distinguish between the free energy of reactionand(ΔG)amd the activation free energy (ΔG‡). The sentence "...have been evolutionarily chosen to minimize the ΔG of the reaction" e.g. is misleading, it should read ΔG 555+‡ instead.  - Marsipan Talk 2:27, 24 September 2007 (GMT)
In the introduction it says:
The reduction of activation energy (ΔG) increases the number of reactant molecules with enough energy to reach the activation energy and form the product.
This confuses me. Is it trying to say that change in free energy (ΔG)=activation energy? Am I right in saying that it should be changed to: "The reduction of activation energy (Ea) increases the number of reactant molecules with sufficient energy (>Ea) to form the product"? --158.39.91.162 (talk) 10:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've always seen the diagram as presented. That is, E+P is at a higher free energy state than EP (due to decreased entropy from product solvation? I would think the enthalpic difference would generally be negligable, since water and amino acid residue side chains can hydrogen bond equally well and the high dielectric constant of water washes out any coulombic interaction differences). The converse is thus true for reactant binding. Pdcook (talk) 21:11, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Free energy vs. activation free energy

message: What about cofactors such as pyridoxal phosphate or thiamine pyrophosphate? Perhaps they should be mentioned in this section. Pdcook (talk) 20:21, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, since no one seems to be saying no, I'll add a couple of examples. Feel free to improve my additions. Pdcook (talk) 17:13, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Covalent Catalysis

message: There seems to be a common misconception that enzymes can actually alter the equilibrium of a reaction.  Since this is more than just a simple, No They Can't statement (if you couple it with ATP, a non-catalytic reagent, you actually can affect equilibrium), I thought I would put it into talk so people could work hard to arrive at a correct, but not confusing, analysis.  --  עבד יהוה   talk 16:59, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Equilibrium
Talk:FokI

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:57, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: FokI (biology) → FokI — Now that the article Foki (programming) has been deleted, there's no need for disambiguation. Yaron K. (talk) 04:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:HindIII

message: Italic usage for HindIII is variable through article  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.210.154.64 (talk) 16:37, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I believe this was the first restriction enzyme that was synthesized or produced, from all restriction enzymes. I am not 100% sure though. Either way, I think it would be useful if the article mentions WHEN it was discovered and WHEN it was first produced; I am quite certain it must be among the first restriction enzymes produced, perhaps even the first one. Either way it should be mentioned IMO. 2A02:8388:1602:6D80:C080:419D:679D:C9F8 (talk) 02:18, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: I think it is important and proper to give a reference citation to the discovery of the target sequence AAGCTT. This was one of the earliest type II restriction enzymes for which the target sequence was determined. That reference is RW Old, K. Murray and G. Roizes J Mol Biol 92(1975) 331-339. 2A00:23C7:639F:5101:A4AC:51:1675:773C (talk) 16:14, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hind III
Talk:Berth (album)

message: In the song, contains a sample of the song "New Noise" by Refused.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chemikalero9 (talk • contribs) 02:31, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maybe Memories 
Talk:Battle of Pločnik

message: What the heck is a "historiography"? It's in the paranthetical in the first sentence. Why not simply use the word "history"? Sorry, I mean "utilize".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.175.68.173 (talk) 07:25, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is Serbian oriented, biassed and does not give a neutral point of view. There are no references to the Ottoman sources that exist and not even the name of the battle in Turkish is given. The Serbian bias is so evident when a person who is an "assassin" from the Ottoman point of view, Miloš Obilić, is described by as "later a hero at the Battle of Kosovo". He may be perhaps be described a "hero" from a Serbian point of view but he was definitely a "low-grade killer" from an Ottoman point of view. By analogy one can look at the article on Gavrilo Princip, the Serbian assassin who started the First World War, and describe Milos Obilic not as a "hero" but as a Serbian "assassin" which he was.Noyder (talk) 23:12, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Milos Obilic "later became a hero in Serbian folklore" - this is 100% neutral point of view. Also, according to the earliest preserved record, a letter from the Florentine senate to King Tvrtko I of Bosnia dated 20 October 1389 (only 3 months after the battle!), Murad was killed during the battle! Check Battle of Kosovo about that. Note that letter was respond to Tvrtko's letter, that was not preserved. But we can assume that Tvrtko's letter was written in September, only two months after the battle. The major problem in this article are numbers of soldiers. There is no way that Lazar alone was capable of deploying 30,000 solders at Plocnik. That is the size of combined Serbian forces at Kosovo, few years latter. Lazar's army at Kosovo was under 15,000. --N Jordan (talk) 01:53, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Serbian bias

message: We need to identify this "Kula Şahin Paşa" or "Şahin Bey". If this Şahin and Lala Şahin Pasha are not the same person, and the former fought at Pločnik and Bileća, then there needs to be changes made at several articles. There are indeed Gbooks hits mentioning Lala Şahin Pasha as the commander at both battles. What does Namık (1982) explicitly say about this matter? It should be noted that the later Hadım Şehabeddin (d. 1453) is commonly also known as Kula Şahin Paşa; I find only hits on this, except the following:--Zoupan 23:15, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Şahin
Talk:Isoschizomer

message: Heya! I just came across this article and corrected that last paragraph about methylation analysis... I hope you guys will agree with me! I deleted the first sentence of the paragraph (only repeats the very first sentence of the article). It is not true for all pairs of isoschizomers that one will recognize the methylated state whereas the other will not. I therefore edited the paragraph, adding remarks such as "in some cases". Finally, some minor changes to the style. --M!ke (talk) 15:12, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Recess, County Galway

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* Write here
The map Northing and Easting given come out in County Kilkenny, not Galway.  Still searching for accurte info.
87.82.5.225 (talk) 22:59, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: The conjecture about the name is completely wrong. "Sraith" does not equate with "sruth". In addition, the sign is correct when "variants" (which can be checked in dictionaries) are taken into consideration. 146.0.216.195 (talk) 19:43, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. I don't really know. Reverted because there was no explanation for the change. Apologies, I have restored your edit. Sarah777 (talk) 21:19, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name
Talk:Specificity constant

message: the last equation in the article is written as : V/E = Kcat/Km x (S/S+1) 
false unit=> L/min ≠ L/(molxmin)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gassan8 (talk • contribs) 00:05, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  the last equation in the article is mathematically incorrect
Talk:Trypsin inhibitor

message: Should guar beens be included in this article? The guar article food section mentions this article. jrun (talk) 20:52, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Guar]]

message: The article incorrectly states that "Trypsin inhibitor is present in various foods such as soybeans, pineapple, papaya fruit, cereals and various additional legumes."  However the reference clearly states that pineapple and papaya fruit have proteases (that break down protein), rather than trypsin inhibitors, that prevent such breakdown.  This needs to be corrected.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.248.33.194 (talk) 09:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Protease vs. Trypsin Inhibitor]]
Talk:Roundstone, County Galway

message: I suggest that the article on Sean Gorham be merged here.  He is only notable for one event, which can be adequately covered in this article, and per WP:BIO1E a standalone article is not needed when there is little to say about him. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:32, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. He's barely even notable enough to need anything merged in here (though I'll check my copy of Tim Robinson's book about Roundstone later to see if he turns up in there at all). --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 10:26, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No mention of him in the Robinson book. Go ahead and merge anything you think is worth keeping - I'd suggest the archaeology rather than the discoverer. --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 12:41, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger from Sean Gorham
Talk:List of Indianapolis Colts seasons

message: According to the GA criteria, lists can not be GAs. Consider improving individual seasons to nominate that have inline citations, excellent prose, proper images, etc. Let me know if you have any questions on my talk page. --Nehrams2020 21:21, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA failed
Talk:1967 FIS Alpine Ski World Cup

message: The slalom in Jackson Hole in March 26th, the last race of the season, was decicive: Nancy Greene won (being 0.07 of a second faster than Marielle Goitschel); ulltimately she had a margin of 4 points. 213.225.10.48 (talk) 16:44, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last woman race decided for Nancy Greene 

message: When the World Cup started nobody did know how all would come in progress, may be it would go wrong. Such a formula wasn't given before. maybe Team Officials or media representatives did mistrust. I dont't know about " Live Television Broadcasting " of the initial race and the following races, but I know that the Austrian TV broadcaster ORF didn't broadcast. In the later years, the ORF (and maybe Swiss television broadcasting SRG) did live broadcast if there the host TV station did provide as an offer. Maybe, in a few cases there technological possibilities were insufficient (but ORF or SRG, maybe others like German's ARD or Italians RAI, did spare no effort to broadcast a report in the later afternoon). Live broadcasting from Alpine Skiing World Cup races outside from Europe didn't occur. - First beginnings were in the later 1980ies when there were races held in New Zealand and Australia in August (and Swiss and Austrian television audience could see it in the early morning). Maybe, since 1994, there live broadcasting from Canada, the U.S.A., Japan and South Korea did start. 
It is a little peculiar that first Word Cup season was dominated by the French team (never mind that Nancy Greene was able to argue and to win the Overall Title). It could be that dominance of the French was an aftermath of its excellent performance in the FIS Alpine Skiing World Championships 1966? Maybe, the new formula was seriously undervalued by the Austrian Ski Federation (being the most important Ski Federation for long time). I don't know about Swiss or German team very much; the only reason for sporting prowess of Swiss Ski Racers maybe found that they couldn't achieve medals in the big challenges (World Championships 1962 and 1966, and Alpine Skiing Events in the 1964 Winter Olympics) in the recent four years. Maybe, the German Ski Federation had to recover after retirement of excellent ski racers? Skiscout (talk) 20:40, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start on January 5th, 1967
Talk:John, Duke of Valencia de Campos

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of Portuguese monarchs which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RFC bot 21:31, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in process

message: This reads like someone ran it through Babblefish.  Could it be rewritten?--24.42.88.109 (talk) 18:13, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Wat?
Talk:Joan of Portugal

message: what are the sources for 31 march birthdate?I've got 20 March 1439.--14:57, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources?

message: When was she banished from court by her spouse? And when did she become a nun?--85.226.47.128 (talk) 21:58, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which year? 

message: The lead begins too far down the page. The large amount of white space needs to be removed at the top.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 06:47, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Too much white space
Talk:Hankou

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=GJStnRC6pfQC&pg=PA7#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=tfVN0Gwx67YC&pg=PA230#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=t8wdOqCde-YC&pg=PR24#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=KbE04q1lXLoC&pg=PA198#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=azXW683kls0C&pg=PA13#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=AjBX_gBhnI0C&pg=PA86#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=qhe6vP66jN0C&pg=PA209#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=RYGw2QYA3swC&pg=PA225#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=40VJugPCFzkC&pg=PA233#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=EisnZHAMbqkC&pg=PA225#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=QV5Wp2fJbzMC&pg=PA275#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=gl6x2tpkyQMC&pg=PA74#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=fEqIVI501B0C&pg=PA66#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=PNJOxyP0SqEC&pg=PA126#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=s7PLqfBXbwMC&pg=PA87#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=jlRHZdWJlV4C&pg=PA76#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=VW67uwsVuh8C&pg=PA85#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=EKwbAQAAMAAJ&q=Armed+threats#search_anchor
http://books.google.com/books?id=UCMjFlnsggUC&q=Recovered+Hankou+jiujang+#search_anchor
http://books.google.com/books?id=V2d12iZkgOwC&pg=PA1166#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=D3BeGTxGD0wC&pg=PA149#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=saJxAAAAMAAJ
http://books.google.com/books?id=uVpziLD6u5IC&pg=PA51#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rajmaan (talk) 06:46, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Northern expedition in hankou 
Talk:Luisa de Guzmán

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was page moved. @harej 01:12, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Luisa of Medina-Sidonia → Luisa de Guzmán — This woman is never referred to as Luisa of Medina or Luisa of Medina-Sidonia. The current title is invented. English language sources published after 1990 (including Britannica and books about Portugal, Spain and royalty) refer to her as Luisa de Guzmán. Surtsicna (talk) 22:51, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
As shown by Surtsicna above, she is called "Luisa de Guzmán" in English-language sources. DrKiernan (talk) 09:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

text: I concur. The "de" in her surname is not usually translated in English, so moving or re-directing this page to "Luisa of Guzmán" is inappropriate and should not be completed without a move request. FactStraight (talk) 07:16, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Luisa de Guzmán
Talk:Eleanor of Portugal, Queen of Denmark

message: Can someone upload this image of her?--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 21:58, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image Request 

message: Someone should look at the italian article on her and used the references there. That article is really cited.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 22:20, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:İkizdere

message: twin-rivers  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.89.239.68 (talk) 06:24, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there a river called the Kalapotomos near here? Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 19:23, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Kalapotomos
Talk:St. Catherines Island

message: I found the coordinates by Googling "St. Catherine's Island South Newport, Georgia address". This page was the 13th result (1 May 2008) giving coordinates for tides at certain points around the island. From there, I googled the coordinates and zoomed out. After moving the pointer to the middle of the island, I converted the coordinates to DMS and added them here to be able to display a map. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 03:41, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 

message: perhaps there should be a disambiguation for St.Catherine's Island, as there are many islands with this name not least the island fort of St. Catherines in Tenby, UK.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.195.169.78 (talk) 00:00, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:Pedro de Alcântara, Prince of Grão-Pará

message: Relative to today's revert war, The Royalty Digest is considered neither obscure nor biased per se, rather it is a generally reputable source. That said, the article used as a citation here clearly takes the side of the Petropolis branch in the dynastic rivalry, which is no doubt why that branch's website has linked to it. Still, the article can include it and remain balanced, by noting the precise words & circumstances of Dom Pedro de Alcantara's renunciation, and of his son's claim: although my recollection is that Dom Pedro Gastao did not claim the throne immediately upon his father's death, but did so only after the legal dispute with the Vassouras branch over the family's vast Petropolis properties in the mid-40s, exacerbated by the rivalry during the referendum on the monarchy in 1992. I'm editing both views in, so that it is clear that even if Dom Pedro did not consider his renunciation legally binding (after all, it was signed post-monarchy), he appears to have considered it morally so, since he did not claim the throne when his mother died, nor openly dispute his nephew's claim, nor assert a claim on behalf of his son. More sources will continue to shed light on the matter and should be added if reputable, but as of now, I see no further grounds for the sides to excise each other's content: the active competition began after Dom Pedro de Alcantara's death and thus doesn't belong in this article. FactStraight (talk) 04:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reneged renunciation
Talk:Infanta Maria Teresa of Braganza

message: If her husband died in May 1812, how could her son be born posthumously in 1811 -- which is his DOB according to his own article? Also, the links to and from her husband are totally screwed up! --Michael K. Smith (talk) 12:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kalkandere

message: www.kalkandere.net  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.228.46.140 (talk) 10:48, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  www.kalkandere.net 

message: I'm guessing that part of this article is in Turkish because someone is currently in the process of translating it from a Turkish source. Koro Neil (talk) 04:49, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turkish
Talk:Sea Island, Georgia

message: The following paragraphs were removed from the article because they are inconsistent with WP:V:
.
* Many streets on the island were previously maintained by Glynn County. In fact, the company deeded the roads to the county in the 1960s. Recently, however, the company asked the county to give up its rights to utility easements and various roads on the island in order to enhance security for the island's residents by way of restricted access. 
* Sea Island Company recently built a fishing pier at Gascoigne Bluff on nearby St. Simons Island since the public will no longer be able to fish from the bridge over Black Banks River, an 80 year tradition. 
* Many visitors to Sea Island consider themselves “regulars”; they travel to the island multiple times a year to spend time with family and friends.  The network of people creates a warm and friendly environment in which visitors can relax and enjoy leisure activities in the company of friends.  Although many of these “regulars” have been going to Sea Island for their entire lives, new comers are always welcome.  The atmosphere is ideal for meeting new acquaintances, and possibly life-long friends.  Popular activities in the area include golf, kayaking, swimming, tennis, bike riding, and many other social events. 
Of course, this material can be restored with verifiable references. --Tenmei (talk) 03:10, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Paragraphs without reference citations
Talk:Microarray analysis techniques

message: Three pages cover very similar ground and could be considered for merger (or at least organisation of information between them).
#Microarray analysis techniques
#Significance analysis of microarrays
#Gene chip analysis
Any opinions? T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 02:24, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Support merge; there is significant duplication of both scope and content, while the Gene chip analysis page is poorly referenced (all but two small sections have no references at all). Klbrain (talk) 18:30, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: For Significance analysis of microarrays,  Klbrain (talk) 21:39, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

text: For Significance analysis of microarrays,  Klbrain (talk) 21:50, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 