Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cartoon Network/Archive 2

message: "Why this article is a part of WikiProject Cartoon Network?" To answer that question, I have new ideas.
* In the articles about Hanna-Barbera's works:
	
This article about an animated short, a feature film or a television series produced by Hanna-Barbera is within the scope of the Cartoon Network WikiProject, 
a project to protect and maintain articles relating to Cartoon Network. If you would like to participate, 
you may join at the project page.
* In the articles about Warner Bros.' animated program:
	
This article about a television series produced by Warner Bros. and therefore broadcast by Cartoon Network is within the scope of the Cartoon Network WikiProject, 
a project to protect and maintain articles relating to Cartoon Network. If you would like to participate, 
you may join at the project page.
* In the articles such as Dexter's Laboratory, The Powerpuff Girls, Ed, Edd 'n' Eddy, The Cramp Twins, Codename: Kids Next Door, Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends, Robotboy and Demashita! Powerpuff Girls Z‎:
	
This television series is an original production of/for Cartoon Network or a joint project in which Cartoon Network is involved. Therefore, this article is within the scope of the Cartoon Network WikiProject, 
a project to protect and maintain articles relating to Cartoon Network. If you would like to participate, 
you may join at the project page.
* In the articles such as Atomic Betty and Pet Alien:
	
Cartoon Network was not involved in the production of this television series. However, there is a contract that Cartoon Network broadcast this television series across the world. Therefore, this article is within the scope of the Cartoon Network WikiProject, 
a project to protect and maintain articles relating to Cartoon Network.  If you would like to participate, 
you may join at the project page.
* In the articles about a version of Cartoon Network, its sister channel(s) such as Boomerang, Pogo, Cartoon Network Too or a television block such as Toonami and Miguzi:
	
This article about the Cartoon Network channel, its sister channel or a television-programming  block on that channel is within the scope of the Cartoon Network WikiProject, 
a project to protect and maintain articles relating to Cartoon Network.  If you would like to participate, 
you may join at the project page.
By the way, are these within the scope of the project?
* Adult Swim and its original programs.
* A television series that Cartoon Network broadcast in some countries or at least in one country such as Code Lyoko, Totally Spies! and Winx Club.
JSH-alive talk to mesee my worksmail to me 08:05, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, nice of you to drop by! Odd question because I've never wondered what we cover and nobody I know has asked it.  These however don't as they fracture what we cover down way too far and as mentioned some shows don't count. Personally, I feel that most productions before 1993 don't fall under our jurisdiction and are covered by more capable projects and WB shows do air on CN frequently in and outside of the US so count but are low on our importance. All that said though it's best we don't overstretch ourselves and label absolutely everything aired in any country which recieves CN or it's sister channels since the start of CN. There's also a high risk of just labelling everything so I propose that for now we stick to the core programmes which air right now generally everywhere in the world which'd mean Code Lyoko, Totally Spies! and Winx Club, heck even ol' Naruto wouldn't count seeing as all 4 of those don't air where I am on CN and not in other places either from what I know. --treelo talk 00:32, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Really? Don't see why someone can't make suggestions if they feel they'll benefit the project unless they're clearly talking out of their butt then you can tell them to run home. "Hanna or Barbera" though, classy. --treelo talk 00:32, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New talk page message ideas. 

message: Right, going away for one week to unmuddle some stuff and try and figure out the best way forwards for here. Anything for me can be plonked onto my talkpage, don't change too much whilst I'm gone.
Oh yeah, before I set off I'd like to tell you all that I've archived some of the talkpage (don't touch it), I'll be thinking about implementing the class and importance system I've mentioned and to clear up the confusion surrounding what our project scope is it's very simple. Anything after 1995 is ours, WB produced and CN aired shows are also as the European co-productions, licensed shows are not, no matter where they show. Have fun whilst I'm gone, I need more input from Squirepants, Black Kat and Vinch so get them in and start knocking some heads together! --treelo talk 00:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm back from my break but really I wonder why nothing occurred here on the talk page since I left. Did the project just go pop whilst I left because I was the last person to edit this. This type of thing makes me seriously doubt the existence of this project with such lack of commitment. Nonetheless, we got 2 new members (though I am holding judgement on if the most recent additions bring anything to the table) let's get some action going. --treelo talk 18:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I've begun with the KND situation, I can't really make the "prose" better, though I have atleast cleared up some space for future work. The lack of time prevented me from doing anything else, but here you can see my first attempt at cleaning up these articles. Any comments? —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 18:41, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taking a Wikibreak 

message: Notice a new addition to the template? That's the assessment scale, something to help us push articles to our much-loved B-Class status. We will need to do two things, add the template to the remainder of the articles under our steely glare and and class them as per the assessment scale here.
Simple to add, use the old  but with the added element of the |class=? just after the work Network, e.g  generating:

The system goes a bit further on the Assessment page for the project but here's a quick rundown. 

Further details are on the assessment page, usage details on the template page. Now go forth and classify! Any question, just add 'em. --treelo talk 22:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ahem, I do mean what I say! We have only 54 articles with templates so far, we need to add it to more and classify them so the system works. The weakest link in the chain is you, blah blah blah. --treelo talk 14:09, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Assessment scale 

message: Ok, this page was purged from most of the non-notable characters, one timers definitely got deleted. How's it look now? —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 16:51, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massive cleanup 

message: OK, we don't have any policies whatsoever but I had no idea what else to call it so here goes. I'm proposing that any of the edits relating to the touchy subject of fancruft can be discussed at the fancruft talkpage which I created. Respond in the usual manner for decisions using Oppose or Approve. I was going to shift T-borg's recent edit summary to the page but until a consensus is reached, it'll remain here. --treelo talk 20:34, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, what's the deal with this "fancruft talk page", Treelo? I don't see other WikiProjects having separate talk pages for topics like cruft and such. Plus, unless you don't want others seeing what's on it, I also suggest adding a link to it at the top of this page at least. And still please explain it's purpose, as it seems it'll just be duplicating the purpose of this page. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 20:47, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

text: The deal is that lots of discussion about it could easily detract from whatever else is going on. Lots of talk could be made about it and it's not duplication seeing as the purpose of the project is not solely to keep the threat of cruft-filled articles down to a minimum. There'd be a link but it's not intended to replace or act as duplicate of any talkpage you can mention. So no other WP is doing it, that doesn't matter at all, the thing is that I foresee a lot of talk about who edited what and if it was correct to do so and so on, that'd easily distract if something besides cruft edits came up. You may not see a purpose yet, I see one which help out way more than just dumping everything here because cruft makes up 80% or so of basic editing duties for us.  You can oppose, just say so. --treelo talk 22:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I still have some doubts about the idea, but ultimately, consensus will show. Thanks. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 22:37, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Policy Update