Talk:List of busiest airports by international passenger traffic

message: I can find the  2007 data which shows the Top 30 list but not the 2008 data. I'm skeptical that Toronto-Pearson is #9 in the 2008 table when it was #25 in 2007 with half the number of passengers. Hypertall (talk) 16:50, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed Toronto, since the number cited was the same as the number of TOTAL passengers on Toronto-Pearson's own wiki page. Hypertall (talk) 17:05, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

text: If you double check the tables presented, they are not full-year statistics, and do not refer to the same length of time. The %change is based on source figures.--Huaiwei 13:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's still inconsistent, 2005 has a larger number of passenger over a shorter period of time so the 0.9% do not add up, to have this increase, that would mean over 14 million passengers in LHR during September 2006 (nearly 25% of the annual traffic!). Same problem with other airports. Blastwizard 17:22, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there any particular reason that Gatwick and Charles de Gaulle seem to have changed location over the years and the location of each has got less specific over time? Kae1is (talk) 23:26, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 2008 Data

message: Oslo Airport, Gardermoen should be on this list. Because had, based on this list http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_airports_in_the_Nordic_countries, 19,043,800 passangers in 2007.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.69.198.27 (talk) 11:52, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: One list with all passengers, this list should be only international passengers, I understand.Meerwind7 (talk) 10:51, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oslo Airport, Gardermoen 

message: since the use of the eurpean union passports, does this still count as international travel.
:The members of the EU are still independent nation states, though with an additional common supra-national legal structure. You still have to use a passport in airports and the Schengen Agreement only applies to land borders. 23:26, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page included passengers traveling within the EU

message: Hong Kong should probably not be on this list since the international passengers number includes a large proportion of travellers to mainland China. Those passengers should count as domestic passengers. Hong Kong has since 1997 been a part of the country of China (one country, two systems). Oberoende (talk) 15:48, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hong Kong 

message: The idea that 15 airports are ahead of New York's JFK, and that Chicago's O'Hare and Atlanta's Hartsfield-Jackson do not even make the top 30, makes this data highly questionable. We have two airports in Turkey making the top 30, but only two airports - JFK and Miami - in the entire US in the top 30. Who would believe that Los Angeles International is not among the top 30 busiest airports in the world, according to this list? This is laughable.  
Since 1998, Hartsfield-Jackson in Atlanta has been the busiest passenger airport in the world, averaging 250,000 passengers per day. Its monthly average is between 7 - 8 million passengers, or at least 84 - 96 million passengers per year. 
The main article should be modified to reflect accurate data.
Below is Oct 2012 data for Harstfield-Jackson - 8 million passengers, and 7.7 in Nov 2012: 
http://www.atlanta-airport.com/docs/Traffic/201210.pdf
http://www.atlanta-airport.com/Airport/ATL/ATL_FactSheet.aspx  
Merlin1935 (talk) 00:24, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is for international passengers only. Hartsfield-Jackson has the greatest number of passengers, but a majority of them are domestic, not international. Lawsonstu (talk) 21:35, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Questionable Data

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of busiest airports by international passenger traffic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101206022153/http://www.aci.aero/cda/aci_common/display/main/aci_content07_c.jsp?zn=aci&cp=1-5-212-1376-1379_666_2__ to http://www.aci.aero/cda/aci_common/display/main/aci_content07_c.jsp?zn=aci&cp=1-5-212-1376-1379_666_2__
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101206022153/http://www.aci.aero/cda/aci_common/display/main/aci_content07_c.jsp?zn=aci&cp=1-5-212-1376-1379_666_2__ to http://www.aci.aero/cda/aci_common/display/main/aci_content07_c.jsp?zn=aci&cp=1-5-212-1376-1379_666_2__
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:30, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The presented data is not corresponding at all with given sources. It has many factual errors and many missing entries.
I think this article should be deleted due to too many factual errors (for too many years). -- ZH8000 (talk) 12:48, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The presented data is not corresponding at all with given sources.