lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Caproni Ca.310

message: The English form is "commando" and that is what AWB is using.  Is "Comando" here the American or Italian version?  I accidentally changed two to "commando" with AWB, which I will remove from the AWB spell checker if "comando" is the US version. Snowman 13:40, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, just following the exact title of the source, which is spelled "Comando." FWIW Bzuk 14:09, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yap, Italian correct word is comando with one "m". --Attilios 14:12, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I guess that the English equivalent of "Comando Supremo" is "Air Marshall".  Is that correct?  Actually, I have sometimes had to use a web-based Italian-to-English translator on some of the Italian aeroplane pages on the en wiki. Snowman 14:33, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commando or comando? 

message: Does anyone know how many Ca.310s Peru acquired? Manxruler 23:43, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Peruvian Ca.310s

message: I have tried and failed miserably to sort this out. there must be something wrong with the actual archive pages?--Petebutt (talk) 09:52, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  unknown url and date missing
Wikipedia talk:Responsible tagging

message: Robots, please be aware that the tags on the essay are for illustrative purposes only. Date them if you want, but don't remove them. Anton Mravcek 23:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Attn: Robots

message: I'd like to modify this essay in th efollowing way.
I propose that:
# To indicate that the goal of reponsible tagging is for reviewers (also read more experienced copy editors) to communicate with deditors (read domain experts) how to solve quality problems within the article.
# There are two type of tagging strategies:
## Classification Notices - these only state - there may be a problem ... e.g. lack of inline ciation notice. They do not point to the domain experts how to start to fix the problem. They are also persistant in the sense that they often remain long after the problem has been adressed.
## Prescriptive Notices - these pointing out specific issues — and show the editor how to fix the problem. Once they are resolved they can be removed with confidence by the editor.
Inline tags have a Prescriptive function, while most notices only classify the article.
This essay needs to recommend that the reviewers use the most specific tags or notices to provide colaborators with as much information as possible.BO; talk 14:39, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: 078965322` 41.113.204.113 (talk) 14:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: change in slant

message: Wikipedia:Responsible_tagging#The_multiple_issues_tag_.28multiple_issues.29 I can't believe that's a serious section.  Going to fix it up. CarolMooreDC 18:32, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a serious section. Like the rest of the article, an example of some tags has been given along with an article that may cause said tags to be applied. Op47 (talk) 22:19, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple issues vandalized??
Talk:National Climatic Data Center

message: How it is funded or where it gets it Budget from? How high is the budget per anno? -- Hartmann Schedel cheers 17:23, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You may want to have a look at the page 29 of 2013 Annual Report.--Quest for Truth (talk) 13:00, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Budget 

message: This Section is now incorrect.  NOAA’s former three data centers (the National Climatic Data Center, the National Geophysical Data Center, and the National Oceanographic Data Center, which includes the National Coastal Data Development Center) have merged into the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI).  Web links for NCDC now show text stating that the center is part of NCEI, even though the web page addresses still contain "NCDC" in the web address (e.g. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/about).  Merging the pages for the three OLDER names, and providing appropriate "Forwards" for those names to the new page is required, but may be beyond my editting skills for Wikipedia to assure it is done correctly.  
9Questions (talk) 17:40, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I would rather suggest to keep the three articles of the former data centers, and create a new article about NCEI, because of the nature of the merger, and also the already existing content in the articles. It is unnecessary to mirror the merger in the real world. Former government agencies may have their own standalone  articles. --Quest for Truth (talk) 12:26, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree with the approach of keeping the pages for the three seperate data centers as descriptions of organizations that used to exist, and having all current tense discussion of these organizations on the NCEI page.  Good solution.  9Questions (talk) 15:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the consensus not to merge, closing the proposal and removing the merge templates.  Klbrain (talk) 16:42, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  NAME CHANGE!  Inaccurate page
Talk:Diana Butler Bass

message: speedy is only for people where no notability is asserted. Saying one has published 6 notable books is at least an assertion, so I decline the speedy as the reviewing admin. 
But that is not a judgment on whether or not she is actually notable--thats for afd or prod if anyone wants to challenge it. 
DGG (talk) 00:08, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made some changes to address the concerns raised. I hope this will resolve the issue. One question: When the entry was created, her middle and last name were not capitalized. Can this be fixed?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rbdbjbeb (talk • contribs) 03:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed the opening, unsupported and unhelpful sentence: 
"Diana Butler Bass, an independent commentator on American religion, is a leader in Mainline (Protestant) and Progressive Christianity." 
That sounded like it was cribbed from promotional materials coming from the subject herself, or something. Who says she's a "leader," and who gets to define "leader?"  And what does "independent commentator" even mean?  (What in the world is a "dependent commentator?") I haven't read the rest of the article, but if it's done in similar style, someone knowledgeable about, but not intent on promoting, the subject of the article should clean it up. 72.229.42.216 (talk) 01:50, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  biased opening sentence
Talk:Powers Catholic High School

message: This article needs a lot of work. I got rid of the Grandparents Day info, as it was not encyclopedic. The only reference cited was a link to the school website, and refered to a section that didn't appear on that page, so it is gone. I moved Notable Alumni above the external links, per the Manual of Style. There are a lot of citations necessary to support some of the claims. Basically, I did some cleanup, but a lot more needs to happen. Nburden 00:16, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: , your recent edits to the article are problematic.  All the information in the article has to be neutral and verifiable and that information has to be verifiable to reliable sources.   You have added information that may be true but isn't verifiable as there was no source provided and I removed it.  Is there any reliable source that publishes ACT average scores for schools?  We would need to have that source before that information could be added.  The same goes for the claim that 100% of graduates are accepted to college, unless their is an independent reliable source for this information it just doesn't belong.  Your editing pattern suggests you are in some way affiliated with the school, if you are I would suggest you read Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.  People with a conflict of interest are discouraged from directly editing the article as they have a hard time being neutral.  If you have any questions, please ask.  -- GB fan 11:10, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: , I have no idea what Grand Blanc is, so no I am not some bitter grad of whatever school that is.  You must provide a reliable source if you restore the information again and the school is not a reliable source for this types of information as the school can say anyth8ing it wants to.  Also do not remove my posts to this page again. -- GB fan 00:00, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits
Talk:Forrest Sherman-class destroyer

message: Were these named after the Civil War generals? --BDD 16:21, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really. I haven't seen a source characterize what they were named after, but a look at :Category:Forrest Sherman class destroyers indicates to me that they were named after prominent military figures dating from the Revolutionary War (USS Barry (DD-933)) through Korea (USS Turner Joy (DD-951)). Maralia 17:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomenclature

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met.    --dashiellx (talk) 17:54, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: I removed the reference to the Mitscher-class being Forrest Sherman hulls because my research into the Shermans indicate it isn't true.  According to "U.S. Destroyers: An Illustrated Design History", by Norman Friedman, the Mitscher and her sisters were a different class altogether.  Friedman writes on page 246:
*"When the CNO rejected DD-927 as the basis for mobilization planning (16 February 1951) he ordered the SCB to develop a NEW destroyer of 'reasonable' size.  Within the fleet the sentiment was strong that the only good destroyer in existence was the Fletcher, so the SCB tried for a NEW FLETCHER.  In April 1951, it issued preliminary characteristics for a NEW standard type, at the time designated SCB-85."
So according to Friedman, the Sherman-class began as an updated version of the Fletcher class design.
Elsquared (talk) 04:05, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mitscher-class reference removed 
Talk:List of stars with proplyds

message: I've excised Cha 110913-773444 because it is too small to be even a brown dwarf. 132.205.44.5 00:22, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: excised Cha 110913-773444

message: The tables are bland, and need to look like the tables seen on this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unconfirmed_extrasolar_planets Deoxy99 (talk) 05:31, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll be working on that. Syntheticalconnections (talk) 04:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I got it. Syntheticalconnections (talk) 04:39, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color needed in Page 

message: I think the extremes is unneeded, and it seems to just take up more space on a page that is way under construction. It seems that no one with good knowledge to color the tables have been here, let alone anyone else who know enough about wikipedia to request it be colored (like deoxy).
Also, I think that we should merge some of the tables (if not all) and color code them by type. Syntheticalconnections (talk) 04:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tables 

message: I've removed a number of systems from this list that are actually debris discs rather than protoplanetary discs. I'm afraid I don't enough about proplyds to add any to the list. This leaves the list rather empty and to be honest I'm not sure there's much point in this page at all. Perhaps it should just be deleted. AstroMark (talk) 23:12, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Debris Discs]] ≠ [[Protoplanetary Discs]]
Talk:Martin Merton

message: Does anyone know who the actor of Martin Merton is?Kbbbb 10:56, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Who plays Merton?
Talk:Sandsinker

message: I don't see how this is spam; it's not really promotional. The link isn't linkspam either: it seems relevant to the topic and isn't promotional in any way. Unless there are past issues regarding this that I don't know about, it seems like a perfectly legitimate stub to me. —Scott5114↗ 00:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. When I first looked at it, it looked like a commercial link. Sorry for jumping the gun on it. --Bfigura (talk) 00:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

message: In using sandsinkers I have found out that:
1.  When compared to lead (or other metal) sinkers they don't go as far when casting INTO THE WIND.  However, when casting WITH the wind, sandsinkers go further than metal.  The wind helps them go further.
2.  If the sandsinkers is dipped into water just before casting, it casts better.
3.  If the sandsinkers are not stuffed completely full of sand, but kind of loose, they cast a lot better.
138.89.90.51 (talk) 14:54, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sandsinker Tips
Talk:Entertainment.ie

message: I changed the passage related to wins of the Golden Spider award to focus only on the 2005 win as this is the only one that I could verify on-line and I am not privy to off-line sources on the topic.  The 2005 win was documented via the Internet Archive, which only has snapshots of the site back to 2004. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:49, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Golden Spider awards 
Talk:Grillades

message: The article needed a substantial rewrite. I've added an explanation of what grillades are, and what grillades and grits (as near as I can tell, the most popular grillades recipe) are. The article seems to me to no longer be stub class, so I've removed those classifications.
I've also changed the pronunciation: /ɡrɨˈlɑːdz/ may be proper French, but /ɡree-yahds/ is how the name of the dish is pronounced in Creole country. I don't feel competent to render it in IPA; I'd appreciate it if someone who did would add an IPA pronunciation. Sam Paris (talk) 18:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Template talk:Islamism

message: Should other parties like the Turkish AKP, Iraqi [[SIIC], Islamic Dawa Party, Islamic Virtue Party, Moroccan PJD and Bahraini al-Watan parties be included? Should orgs be listed by country? AndrewRT(Talk) 00:49, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't really think we can include a list of "islamic conepts" in this template. This is because Islamists discuss almost all concepts, from spiritual to tmeporal, from economics to sex, including the major tenets of Islam and its major texts.Bless sins (talk) 02:59, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Template:Islamism

message: I noticed that Muhammad Asad, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and Sheikh Usthaz M.A.M.Mansoor are included on the template. Islamism doesn't seem to be mentioned in the articles on these individuals. Plus, the first was a Qur'an translator, the second is the prime minister of Turkey and the third appears to be an academic; on what basis are they included here? MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:55, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islamists 

message: Fatwa on terrorism is one person's view it has no historical significance or has had not even  1% impact on the ground .Hence removed.It is only a book Fatwa on Terrorism and Suicide Bombings.122.167.142.157 (talk) 05:23, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fatwa on terrorism 

message: I have added Islam and gender segregation under the concepts section because it is a key Islamist goal. Please discuss before removal.--125.25.135.162 (talk) 05:32, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islam and gender segregation
Talk:Ruger Alaskan

message: Neither story about Greg Brush specifically states that he was carrying the Ruger Alaskan, however, a series of photographs which have not all been published at reputable news sources have appeared on online blogs, forums, and spam emails that clearly show Brush holding his .454/.45LC Alaskan next to the bear carcass. I may email him and ask for permission to use that photo on wikipedia. --Jdjonsson (talk) 20:11, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I feel that the Alaskan is a part of the Super Redhawk family, not a distinct design (see http://www.ruger.com/products/superRedhawk/index.html).  This is similar to the way that the SIG Sauer P226 and the P229 are treated.  Faceless Enemy (talk) 00:21, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and have merged the articles. Felsic2 (talk) 17:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger with [[Ruger Super Redhawk]]
Talk:Ruger 10/17

message: I'm wondering if we should merge this to Ruger 10/22? It's really just a variant and it was very short-lived, so it's unlikely get grow past a stub. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 01:35, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: I redirected the page to the parent article with this edit; please let me know if there are any concerns. --K.e.coffman (talk) 02:42, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Penfield High School

message: There existed a "List of Students" section. I've removed it, as this is of no encyclopaedic value. Dsh6640 (talk) 06:16, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 
Talk:Ruger SP101

message: The SP101 was made in 9mm for a short time, however, any product pages from Ruger are long gone. The only references available for this are in Forums. Any suggestions on what to do for the citation needed?
--Chrisf8657 (talk) 10:48, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  9mm Citation 

message: Try the Internet Archive. — Robert Greer (talk) 18:59, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archive.ORG
Talk:Ahmedpur, Birbhum

message: There are two pages for this town - Ahmedpur, Birbhum and Ahmadpur, Birbhum, and incidentally both have been there for quite a long time. The earlier one is slightly older and the one that seems to be more in use. The census authorities have used the latter spelling. The Ahmedpur page was started for the Birbhum town and the Ahmadpur page was started for the Latur, Maharashtra town. It seems to have been taken over later for the Birbhum town. Now there is a separate Ahmedpur, Latur page for the Maharashtra town. For the Birbhum town, I propose retention of the older page and the newer page be marked as a redirect. - Chandan Guha (talk) 07:27, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Umbrian language

message: As i said in the title, there’s no name for what the umbians called their language. There’s no  𐌔𐌍𐌉𐌅𐌖𐌊𐌉 (ikuvins), it might be an unsourced content.So im willing for someone to delete it. If i am wrong, you can reply to me. Newroderick895 (talk) 19:49, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree; from what I can see in various online books, the word ikuvins is well attested, but it's apparently just an adjectival toponym, meaning "from Iguvium". While Iguvium may have been an important centre of the Umbri, I can find no indication that this was used as the name of the Umbrian language. If there are sources to that effect, it can of course be reintroduced. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:57, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theres NO native name for the Umbrian language by the Umbrians. 

message: Why is there no information about the actual language here--phonology, morphology, vocabulary, syntax...as there is for most other languages? If I cite everything, I hope it's ok if add some of this content. I'll try to make it parallel to the structure of such content as provided on, for example, the Oscan, and maybe eventually the Latin page. Johundhar (talk) 00:20, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you are right, there is not much information here. Go ahead, please! Alex2006 (talk) 05:14, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ars longa, Vita brevis! :-) Alex2006 (talk) 18:17, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Impoverished Site
Talk:Shooting Times

message: Someone should discuss on this or disambig Shooting Times since there is a US publication with the same name that has given rise to cartridges designed by its editors. Arthurrh 01:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different Pubs 

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:020807stcover.jpg, found on :Shooting Times, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact ST47. STBotI (talk) 00:36, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted

message: Since this publication is called "Shooting Times & Country" can we rename it to match? I mention this because there is a US publication that is also called "Shooting Times" and we should set this up to accommodate both of them - since their titles aren't exactly the same, this should be doable. Other possibilities are "Shooting Times (UK)" and "Shooting Time (USA)" etc. Comments? AliveFreeHappy (talk) 20:31, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move (title change)
Talk:Nathan Hale High School (Washington)

message: The page was flagged up in recent changes. I noticed a couple of things which I've changed, namely the Principal's name was wrong (corrected) and the school motto looked like nonsense (removed).
Please see General Tips and Structure sections of the Wikipedia Schools Project for guidelines on articles about Schools. This article is almost a year old and contains no content at all.
Note especially: The key to writing a good school article is to explain why the school is unique.
DMcMPO11AAUK 01:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: September 2007

message: I am going to go ahead and remove the maintenance template that refers to this article being written by someone with a close connection to the subject matter. As far as American high school articles go, I feel that this page is mostly neutral and provides unbiased information. Since the template was posted in 2020 the article has been cleaned up quite a bit. If anyone disagrees, please let me know on this talk page and we can figure out how to improve this article.
Chilcokr (talk) 16:44, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Maintenance Template
Talk:Jens Lindemann

message: I've removed the list of Philharmonics that Jens played "at". It didn't work: those that were not redlinked were orchestras not venues, and it is a bizarre characteristic to choose as a common thing to lump places under. Nice idea as an abstract thing, but it just doesn't really work like that. (It works no better or worse if you substitute "Pubs called the Dog and Duck" or "Sushi bars" or "Festival Halls", basically - you'll get some hits, some misses in each case.) Rather than try to sort out the ensuing de-Philharmoniced mess, I then just deleted it and patched up the wording. If we are saying he played in major venues worldwide then I really do not think we need to mention every city these might have been in like ticking them off on a list - LA, yes, London, yes, Berlin etc. Ooh yes, and Bangkok too... So I think it's tidier as it now is, and I hope you do too. Cheers DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk) 16:27, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philharmonics list 

message: A series of edits like this one remove a few words from the first sentence of this article. The editor(s) haven't brought it here to discuss, nor have they responded to messages on their talk pages. They don't use edit summaries. If they would share their rationale for the changes then we might make some progress but if they just keep removing it without explanation one starts to worry what is going on. I'm tending to restore the deleted text at the moment, but I wish that the editor(s) concerned would discuss it, or use the edit summary, or something. The encyclopaedia is supposed to work by collaboration, not just by editing as a soloist. Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 08:42, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  That German-Canadian thing