lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Educational Series

message: A section should be added regarding the 10 Dollar Denomination that was designed but never printed in money form.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeno333 (talk • contribs) 21:04, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Perhaps good info: http://flyingmoose.org/truthfic/1896.htm
 sorry for the tag* but I came across this page with some high res scans and I don't have the subject matter expertise to compare it with existing Commons images and determine what, if any, material supercedes existing Commons material. Nor do I know how to bring this to the attention of currency fans in general rather than a specific user.
https://www.deviantart.com/zeno333/gallery/scraps
_* Found you on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Numismatics/American_currency_task_force Anonymous-232 (talk) 06:35, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want to reach a wider community of numismatic Wikipedians, you might try bringing this up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numismatics.  In the meantime, here's my personal opinion on the images.  While the scans you found are of a higher resolution than most of those found on Commons (including the official BEP scans), they all have the border cropped out, creating the illusion that the printing was larger on the banknote than it actually was.  That said, if you wish to upload the images to Commons anyway, I strongly suggest that you ask permission from zeno333 first.  There is a small chance that the images may have been modified in some way (other than cropping), so it would be wise to have permission from zeno333 as well as confirmation from them that the images were not edited. - ZLEA T\C 08:41, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes and help request
Talk:USS Monterey (CVL-26)

message: Does anyone know why this ship never became a museum ship?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clrichey (talk • contribs) 05:32, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Museum ship 

message: What aircraft did she fly?  Are those Vought F-4U Corsairs?
-G (talk) 15:34, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aircraft complement
Talk:USS Princeton (CV-37)

message: It says in the CV-37 article that Hoskins was the CO of the previous Princeton (CVL-23).  But, in the CVL-23 article, it says that Hoskins was only on his PCO tour, not the actual CO.  Which is correct? Alan.sheets 16:45, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: PCO or CO?

message: Under the heading "Amphibious assault carrier (1959–1970)" the article states" .....and in April 1962 when she delivered Marine Corps advisors and helicopters to Soc Trang in the Mekong Delta area of the Republic of Vietnam (South Vietnam)." However the Princeton was in the Yard in Long Beach at that time where she had been for several months.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.97.161.181 (talk) 16:54, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction of Date Needed!
Talk:USS Rendova

message: Presumably the ship was named for the Rendova Island and its PT base during World War II.  Looking for a source for this though. — MrDolomite • Talk 16:19, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: After a long time, here is a source confirming it: https://www.navsource.org/archives/03/0311427.pdf --GDK (talk) 08:45, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Namesake

message: Contrary to the text, the ship was not "completed as Willamette". This is likely a misreading as the ship was completed "completed at Willamette Iron and Steel Works" (see e.g. https://www.navsource.org/archives/03/0311427.pdf) --GDK (talk) 09:18, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Also the name "Willamette" was also not in the originally cited source. --GDK (talk) 13:41, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Never named ''Willamette''
Talk:USS Tarawa (CV-40)

message: I reverted a large revision, which was addition of the following text:
:The Terrible "T" Made a shake down cruise in 1951 to Gitmo.In the fall of 1951 about October she departed Quanset Point Ri. for a 6 month tour in the Med. In the fall of 1952 she was sent back to the Mediterranean for a second tour with the "Sixth Fleet". The normal six months tour was extended while her relief the "Hornet or the Wasp" was being repaired after hitting a commercial ship in New York harbor. ON Nov.12,1953 the Tarawa was again sent to the Mediterranean where she compeated with the USS Midway in flight deck operations. The "Tarawa" Received the navy "E" for it's operations. The "T" was selected to make a World Cruise.She was subsequentially reassigned to the 77 Taskforce out of Japan. She spent forty days up along the Korean coast.In Sasebo Japan she was picked to represent the United States at the first Battle of Midway celebration; along with the USS O'Bannon DD who was in the battle, and Admiral William "Bull" Halsey, also in the battle. After visiting Sidney Au. and the celebration,she continued to Melbourne Au. and Wellington N.Z. Leaving N.Z. for Pearl Harbor, one day out,She was diverted to Manila P.I. at flank speed. Arriving Subic Bay P.I.she was ordered into the sea between China and Formosa. The Chinees were massing for an invasion of Formosa. After several days in the fog we made Hong Kong then Pearl and San. Fran. through the Canal, "HOME" to Quonset Pt R.I.m September 11,1954
There are at least two errors in it, which makes me worry about the rest: 1) O'Bannon was commissioned late June 1942, so could not have been at Midway; 2) Wasp did not collide with a commercial ship: here is the text from the Wasp wiki article:
On 26 April 1952, Wasp collided with destroyer minesweeper Hobson while conducting night flying operations en route to Gibraltar. Hobson lost 176 of the crew, including her skipper. Rapid rescue operations saved 52 men. Wasp sustained no personnel casualties, but her bow was torn by a 75-foot saw-tooth rip. The carrier proceeded to Bayonne, New Jersey, for repairs and, after she entered drydock there, the bow of aircraft carrier Hornet (CV-12)—then undergoing conversion—was removed and floated by barge from Brooklyn, New York, and fitted into position on Wasp, replacing the badly shattered forward end of the ship. This remarkable task was completed in only 10 days, enabling the carrier to get underway to cross the Atlantic. On 2 June 1952, Wasp relieved Tarawa at Gibraltar and joined Carrier Division (CarDiv) 6 in the Mediterranean Sea. After conducting strenuous flight operations between goodwill visits to many Mediterranean ports, Wasp was relieved at Gibraltar on 5 September by Leyte.
While I respect the author of the edit, who must have been a crew member at the time, the material clearly needs to be fact-checked and edited for grammar.  I recommend he check the history of the ship at DANFS.--Busaccsb (talk) 21:40, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion of Edit 5/30.09
Talk:USS Valley Forge (CV-45)

message: The article and the summary bar on the right give vastly different launch dates for this ship.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.38.132.1 (talk) 16:27, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The inserted copyright warning indicates possible copyright violation due to copy and past from DANFS. However, DANFS is public domain, as noted at the bottom of the page, so why is the copyright notice there, especially since most other USN ship articles also heavily quote from DANFS? Brooksindy (talk) 03:23, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a common mistake for those tags to be placed. DANFS has been properly attributed per WP:FREECOPYING. --Dual Freq (talk) 23:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That was my mistake. I was working on another article last August and I drive-by tagged this one while linking, not recognizing at that moment the truth both of you have clearly expressed. My apologies both for drive-by tagging and for failing to recognize my error. BusterD (talk) 03:18, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright warning 
Talk:List of secondary schools in Hong Kong

message: Alexander the Mans 08:11, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

message: We should actually make/or start up a project on this,and actually have some information,and a picture(s),for each of the schools that are on the list!.. clcheung 05:55, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FURTHER COMPLETION 
Talk:USS Yorktown (CV-10)

message: Not sure how relevant this is, but the Yorktown is used to portray the "U.S.S. Polaris" during a "Tiger Cruise" in the 2020 USS Christmas movie that appeared on the "Hallmark Movies and Mysteries" channel.
Also, planes with the VMFA-142 markings are shown as part of the squadron that flies off the "U.S.S. Polaris."
Don't know if this should be part of the article, but thought I'd mention it for the possibility. 2600:8800:785:9400:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 04:41, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, have a look at WP:MILPOP, and if you believe, based on that guideline, that the film warrants inclusion in a pop culture section, and there is sufficient sourcing to support it, then go ahead and add it. Good luck - wolf 05:27, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hallmark movie 

message: following our laat discussion, my take going forward was to use the "Namesake" parameter in the infobox for the original namesake, (in this case here, the Battle of Yorktown), and if the article subject was named for previous ship (again, with this case here, Yorktown CV-5) then to make note of that in the article prose where the ship naming is discussed and supported. My understanding is this is a take you agree with. But as you see, the article was edited again today, changing the namesake paramater. (Interestingly, this was only the 9th edit made by this new account, with the summary: ""...?!) 
Anyway, I'm not sure if this is a continuing issue on other ship articles, but if perhaps a note were posted at WT:SHIPS (and a notice pointing to it at wt:milhist), it will bring about a wider discussion, and hopefully some resolution. (If you recall, I gave this a try back in September 2021, so if you give it a shot this time, maybe there'll be more responses and even a consensus. I'll be watching , and if you choose to give it a go, you'll have my support. Cheers - wolf 14:36, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Namesake ''redux''
Talk:1987 Edgecumbe earthquake

message: The claims of casualties, etc. ought to be verified with newspaper citations or the like.
Iproteus 08:17, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Uuntitled

message: This page currenly says:
:"The earthquake was the most damaging New Zealand has experienced in recent decades, with approximately 50% of the houses in Edgecumbe being damaged by the quake. "
This statement may need to be revised after the damage estimates of the 2010 Canterbury earthquake are finalised.
220.101 talk\Contribs 11:26, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've weakened it to say "one of the most damaging". --Avenue (talk) 12:21, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most Damaging Quake ??
Talk:ABBAMAIL

message: This article is nothing but a bunch of self-promoting garbage, and represents everything wrong with Wikipedia. It's ironic that this article promotes the myth that ABBAMAIL promotes free speech; this group routinely kicks out people who dissent at all with the mailing list's owners. It's also a lie to say that ABBA List has "faded into obscurity"; it's thriving on Yahoo Groups, and should actually fare better than ABBAMAIL now that ABBAMAIL charges a membership fee now that it can't sell bootlegs anymore - a fact Wikipedia conviently overlooks. ABBAdork 08:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gina Birch

message: Is this the same Gina Birch who was featured on BBC television 12.10.06 regarding adopting 2 Chinese children (news item featured said person playing guitar and rehearsing band)? There can't be that many. Whatever, not notable in itself, but good on her.LessHeard vanU 08:35, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Build automation

message: Maybe the list of build tools should be sorted per programming language. Also, the make-like programs may be placed together. --Philippe 09:04, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I would like to include a table with the following categories: Platform (Operating Systems, Languages), and Description Language (e.g., XML for Ant).
Eddiehu 19:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing the Build Automation article 

message: This section seems to be an unrelated list of software bromides. What's going on here?
Mistercupcake (talk) 07:28, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best Practices? What is that doing here? 

message: Disadvantages should be listed too, also questions, why do we need something like build tools can guide us to a interesting question.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.97.9.127 (talk) 20:14, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advantages and Disadvantages 

message: This page lacked appropriate and valid citations. Content was outdated; It lacked changes that the software industry has experienced. I took out self-promotions  and added updated content that is accurate and has reliable sources. Kharnagy (talk) 18:23, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Rewrite

message: Rewrote since:
* Build automation is _not just_ the process of automating; it is that (the act of creating/configuring automation), but it is the larger practice of building in an automated way which encompasses the creating/configuring of the automation
* CI is not build automation; but build automation is required for CI
* Build automation was not historically accomplished via makefiles; Make is a big part of automation in the past and still is, but I don't think build automation was ever limited to Make
* Just link to list of tools rather than listing some
* The "Depending on the level of automation the following classification is possible" was nonsense; invented for WP
Stevebroshar (talk) 12:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Template talk:Workpage

message: __TOC__ 
Add issues below as you see fit, sign with ~~~~
* Doc. Note:
** Important to use subpages in Talk namespace -- see guideline above
** Linking to destination article will create a backlink. Some readers may get sucked into the workpage through "What links here" while others, one supposes, might find their way back to articlespace. I say the cost outweighs the very slim benefit. The engine already creates automatically a link to the root of the subpage hierarchy; editors don't need the convenience. 
: John Reid 09:21, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: (Upload photos)
Bob Shawn is one of our precious remaining veterans of World War II. His is a wonderfully interesting history, including 323 completed missions in a P-51 Mustang fighter plane. 
Bob currently lives a very active life, enjoying exceptionally good health. His doctors say his heart beats like that of a 23-year-old.  On a recent cold night in March (2014) he was doing his regular volunteer duty with the Herndon police (VA) out on the streets catching DUAs.  All this from a man 93 years old, coming 94 on March 6, 2014. 
Enter list of medals provided by Dennis Shefski.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juliaagzoepap (talk • contribs) 17:22, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Col. Robert A. Shawn (ret.) 

message: Please remove the line  - protection templates are automatically handled by the documentation page. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 06:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:52, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 22 March 2019
Talk:Leukocyte adhesion deficiency

message: It could be useful to cite the relevant literature on fucose in this article, considering that oral administration of fucose to some LAD II patients has beneficial effects.  --Antelan talk 18:35, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: note

message: The different LAD types have different gene defects. For example, )at least) one form of LAD II has a defect in a GDP-fucose transporter , which is not explained in the article. This is a note-to-self (or anyone else who comes along) to update the article to more fully explain LAD. Antelan talk 20:06, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  LAD Types
Talk:Voyages of Christopher Columbus

message: The map of the first voyage is based on Pickering's fringe theory that San Salvador/ Guanahani is Plana crays. I've reviewed an immense amount of academic literature on this topic and can find no support for Pickering's beliefs whatsoever. 
Watling's/ Modern San Salvador clearly is the most favored choice among scholars. This is also acknowledged in the Guanahani article which says Watling's "remains widely accepted as the most probable candidate". (The statement is well-sourced too, referencing a 2012 encyclopedia entry which seems to be the most recent scholarly take on this issue)
Some historians have argued for Samana Crays or Grand Turk but even they remain minority viewpoints. Hence, the map must be changed to reflect the broad consensus on the route taken by Columbus. 
There may be some copyright issues though. Can we attach this map from BBC? (Only including their "commonly accepted route" of course) Jack234567 (talk) 03:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map of the first voyage must be changed 

message: The article says that Columbus brought back the pineapple on his first voyage, but all the sources say he brought it back on his second voyage. Viriditas (talk) 20:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Pineapple 

message: Why does this article only mention his name name in English? 124.170.102.102 (talk) 09:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a note next to his English name with his name in other relevant languages. Thanks for pointing this out. Carlstak (talk) 14:04, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cristoforo Colombo
Talk:Joint Combined Exchange Training

message: I'm reasonably sure this article isnt a duplicate of another somewhere, however I found it a little hard to believe that an article on this doesnt already exist, though I did search as thoroughily as I could.--SGGH 09:35, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm really quite partial to pictures, and you've got them. Sure, this article could afford to be longer, but what you've got is well-organized, professional, and detailed. Plus there's a good handful of references. It does need quite a bit of expansion to be worth going up to GA or A-class, but I think B is fair. It's a lot longer or at least prettier (pictures!) than what I usually consider to be Start class. LordAmeth 23:58, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:World Food Day

message: We need an article about World Food Safety Day. MaynardClark (talk) 02:39, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: World Food Safety Day - June 7
Talk:Nike Air Max

message: Nike has acquired Wikipedia!? That's the reason of this article!?
Looks like a commercial advertisement; Maybe we'll see one from Burger King next.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.104.170.41 (talk) 01:35, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely has WP:NPOV issues. Orphic (talk) 07:36, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

message: "The Beatles' song "Revolution" was used in a television commercial to promote the shoe. It was the only time that a song performed by the Beatles was used in a TV ad.[citation needed]" 
Not only irrelevant in the history section, but also a false bit of trivia. Well done.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.2.204.254 (talk) 14:15, September 20, 2009
:Thanks for pointing that out, although I do vaguely remember a Beatles song being used in a Nike commercial, that bit has been tagged as uncited since October 2007. So i've removed the sentences. Next time, if you see something unsourced that you know to be false just go ahead and remove it. -- œ™ 02:57, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Beatles' song "Revolution"

message: the article is listed as having multiple issues but the issues seem to have been fixed... I am fairly new, and i don't want to go ahead and remove the issues but should I? The page is decent in its content I think, and I can't find evidence for the issues stated. Any help/advice/thoughts? Callum radiator (talk) 21:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  page issues resolved? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Zmuhl (talk) 22:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Writing 2 - Digital Futures

message: Merge Nike Air Max 97 into this article, it's short and mostly covered here, and the Satan Shoes stuff is covered under its own article and Nike, Inc. 70.163.208.142 (talk) 20:58, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: 70.163.208.142 (talk) 00:55, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal May 1, 2023 

message: Can someone more knowledgeable than me add a section for the relatively new Scorpion model of Air Max? It's an interesting shoe 👟 🕵 168.235.211.71 (talk) 01:41, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air Max Scorpion
Talk:Prasthanatrayi

message: Prasthantrayi should probably redirect to this article.
Breedentials (talk) 09:59, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular Alternate Spelling 

message: Should the introductory sentence specify that this is a topic related to Hinduism? If I hadn't linked here from an article on hinduism it wouldn't have been immediately apparent. PurpleChez (talk) 01:21, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  opening
Talk:Philomel (musical instrument)

message: Is this real? I can't find such a definition in the Oxford English Dictionary, or in Groves Encyclopedia of Music. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SemperBlotto (talk • contribs) 03:24, 12 October 2006
:One wonders and it's a pity there's no provenance for the picture, but Encyclopedia Britanica 11 must be verifiable. "Accordance" for tuning sounds like translationese, and  "Monaco di Baviera" would have to be Munich. MGG (to which I don't have full access) seems to have a hit for Philomele' in the article Streichinstrumentenbau. If only we had a blue link for bowed melodion, missing from Schlesinger's contributions! Sparafucil (talk) 07:45, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this real?