Talk:Anacostia station

message: Why does the Anacostia station have a 'longer platform' as stated in the article? The watertable/295 do not make any sense to me as reasons for a longer platform. 295 might lead to a shorter platform (though 8 car trains would limit that option), and I can't figure how a high water table would shorten it. The station does look wider, however, perhaps that's what is meant? Even so, I'm still curious how a high water table or 295 lead to this widening. Rmeskill 19:32, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Longer platform?

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 15:03, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject class rating

message: "...due to complaints of the higher cost of transferring to Metrorail by Southeast D.C. residents and also of crime in Anacostia by Prince George's County residents."
Were the Prince George's County residents the ones complaining about the crime or the ones responsible for it? StaticElectric (talk) 08:56, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The ones complaining; they'd have to take the bus to Anacostia and then transfer to the subway, and were afraid of that. --NE2 09:07, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ambiguous wording

message: Looking over this article, has anyone considered trying to go for Featured with this one? SchuminWeb (Talk) 21:30, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *Do you think it is too long to be encyclopedic? I fear that's the article's biggest drawback. It's a great article (but then, I'm biased) and very complete, but I fear it's too detailed. - Tim1965 (talk) 00:09, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

text: **It should at least go for good article, then it'll get some more attention from other parts of Wikipedia. Geoking66talk 02:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

text: **:Detailed is good. We should nominate it for Good Article. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:06, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *I support going for GA. I will help with improvements once it's nominated. - Tim1965 (talk) 02:52, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Go for featured?

message: :you're killing me. the wmata page is already a ref, and its copyright status is unclear. the flickr have cc licenses, (even if NC,ND) and better pictures.  Slowking4: 7@1|x 14:25, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's really the same issue in both places. Both are derivative works of the original copyrighted artwork, and so the copyright situation is the same for both instances (i.e. the CC license is likely invalid due to the images' status as a derivative work). Would feel far more comfortable using the official sources. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:40, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: no the cc is on the photo, not the derivative, and you don't have a cc on the wmata photos. i don't know why you feel more comfortable with "official" wmata site, if the derivative status is the same? the post office official postion didn't help them in court about the Korean War Veterans Memorial. (and we're just linking to them anyway)  Slowking4: 7@1|x 20:34, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Art

message: What's a "notable place"? And what does "nearby" mean? I'm all for helping to make people aware of what is near a Metro station. But we don't want to run afoul of WP:NOTADVERTISING or WP:LINKFARM.
Furthermore, of the 21 stations on the Green Line, just a third of them have "Notable Places Nearby" sections. (The stations are: :Suitland (WMATA station), :Waterfront (WMATA station), :L'Enfant Plaza (WMATA station), :Archives (WMATA station), :Gallery Place (WMATA station), :U Street (WMATA station), and :Prince George's Plaza (WMATA station).) But almost all stations have a "Location" section. It seems to me that "Notable Places Nearby" is trivia; if the place is really notable, then it should be discussed in the text in the "Location" section. Right? Wrong?
I am also concerned that "notable" for Wikipedia is not the same as being notable in an article of this type. For example, the Smithsonian station is going to have a long list of "notable" places nearby. But West Hyattsville? Probably not. Nonetheless, notably could be established for a number of businesses, historic sites, and geographic locations near West Hyattsville, and Wikipedia articles generated about them which meet Wikipedia's standard for notability. But is that the same as the rationale for including those in an article about a Metro station? It seems to me, at first glance, that the rationale for including mention of a nearby notable place in a Metro station article is much different, or else we run afoul of the first two guidelines mention above.
I'd ike to hear what comments others have. - Tim1965 (talk) 16:32, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable places nearby 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Greenbelt (WMATA station) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 16:30, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Greenbelt Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 17:15, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Anacostia station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110524195459/http://transit.schuminweb.com/transit/wmata/green-line.php?station=F06 to http://transit.schuminweb.com/transit/wmata/green-line.php?station=F06
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:30, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anacostia station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100108141832/http://planning.dc.gov/planning/frames.asp?doc=%2Fplanning%2Flib%2Fplanning%2Fpreservation%2Fpdf%2Fanacostia_historic_brochure.03.07.pdf to http://www.planning.dc.gov/PLANNING/frames.asp?doc=%2Fplanning%2Flib%2Fplanning%2Fpreservation%2Fpdf%2Fanacostia_historic_brochure.03.07.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:13, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There's a lot of information here. But the most helpful information for people that are going there is completely buried - things like parking and daily operations. I just made crime a top level heading since people care about that. In general, for such a long article it should have more headings to index/divide it up. Mulehoss (talk) 05:53, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganize and improve heading heirarchy?