lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:St. Croix River (Wisconsin–Minnesota)

message: Needs section on history of waterway. (Began 11/4/2005)
Needs section on Noteable Bridges
:Hi (to anyone still here after 3 years!) - I'll take a hack at starting this section, and expanding the History section. Pfc598 (talk) 02:30, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  To-do 

message: Not sure what the protocol is, or at least the standard, on providing so many names in alternate languages. I like it and find it very interesting personally, but we don't give the names in other languages for the United States in the article about the United States. I don't want to delete it, but it certainly is something worth talking about. Any thoughts out there in Wikiville? the dharma bum 02:33, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the inclusion of Native names for geographic features of the Americas is relevant and informative to the history and context of these features and their regions, as is the inclusion of variant names assigned by early European explorers (i.e., there were French names for various features in the upper midwest, some of which were kept, some of which were translated to English, and some of which were discarded).  Malepheasant 03:29, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought some more about it after I posed the question last night and pretty much came to the same conclusion, especially based on the historical insights the names provide. Thanks for the thoughts. --the dharma bum 15:34, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other languages 

message: I'm concerned that an unpublished source should not be used here, these are unverified claims and also probably could be considered unfair to the marinas. Discuss? -- Dskluz 06:35, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New fishing section

message: Would like to add a small section (one-two sentences) about the St Croix River Association, just not sure where/how to add it.  Thoughts?  Archivist100 (talk) 19:26, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on the breadth of their focus, I would think about creating a new section entitled something like "Conservation efforts". Most of the last two paragraphs in the "Geography and hydrography" section (starting with The St. Croix River was one of the original eight rivers to have...) could be moved there as well. It's designation as a Wild and Scenic River is mentioned, but there's no explanation of why or the people who made it possible. Mentioning the SCRA would be a start. Minnecologiest,c 19:41, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: St. Croix River Association?

message: If the construction of an interstate bridge imperils the state of the lower reaches of the river, surely it should be possible to cite some proof of this.  AHMartin (talk) 15:57, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bridge peril 

message: Is it pronounced in the French manner, or in some other way?Sylvain1972 (talk) 20:38, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Template talk:Gloucestershire-geo-stub

message: I have removed the coat of arms from this template because that image is not clearly labeled as being free.  Nonfree images are not allowed in stub templates.  If you want to restore the image to the template, obtain convincing evidence that that particular coat of arms is public domain or otherwise ineligible for copyright.  Kelly Martin (talk) 22:07, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Erm, it's the coat of arms of Gloucestershire, how can it not be free?! --kingboyk 15:40, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

text: *Failing presentation of evidence that indicates the image in question is licensed under some fair use license, we must presume that its use here is under a fair use claim. Wikipedia:Fair use criteria item #9 proscribes the use of such images in templates. --Durin 22:33, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Madge Weinstein

message: Should this be organized a little better?  Possibly with subsections for Podcasting and Video Podcasting? Or should those be separate from the Biography? --Robby 22:13, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Madge Weinstein ISN'T really a man. Richard Bluestein may be, but his character is not. This article is about the Internet personality Madge Weinstein, not Richard Bluestein. [Although we really should create an article for him also] Pinchofhope 23:38, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: And no mention of the creator of the character? 151.132.206.146 23:14, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you're going to use the argument that "Weinstein ISN'T really a man.  Richard Bluestein may be, but his character is not." then you need to seriously edit the article.  Weinstein as a fictional character doesn't manage anything.  Weinstein is a fictional character, and the biography insinuates that Weinstein is a real person.  Kythri 00:56, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I'll whip something up later when I'm bored doing work. Pinchofhope 10:48, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography 

message: On Eat this Hot Show #38 Richard Bluestein stated that Madge did not die. It has also been hinted that Madge will one day return. Mike E Fresh 03:25, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Madge Didn't Die
Talk:Contesting controversies

message: This page is not intended to be a discussion forum for controversial topics in Amateur Radio Contesting.  The article is intended to document what the controversies are, for historical and informational purposes.  A secondary purpose of the article is to provide a place for these issues to be documented other than the primary Amateur Radio Contesting article.  Please do not abuse this article by promoting your personal agenda or position on any of these issues.  If you do, however, see something that is inaccurate or could be clarified, please feel free to improve the article.  Also, feel free to add any other historical controversies that might be worth documenting. --Kharker 22:19, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

message: Is this  revision NPOV or not? Proponents and opponents of contesting don't seem to agree. (same discussion as on Contesting)
Again, a partisan viewpoint that does not address the weight and serious of the complaints against contesters. Yet again this is in breach of the impartiality required by Wiki as it is written by contesters who want to present a particular viewpoint that supports, condones and maintains their stance.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.51.214 (talk) 07:53, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request comment 
Talk:The Keeper of Traken

message: Does anyone know if the name "Melkur" was a hat-tip to 	J. R. R. Tolkien's Silmarillion character of Melkor? Capedude2005 (talk) 03:25, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I always wondered that as well Wavy (talk) 08:13, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lord Of The Rings Influence
Talk:Gakushuin University

message: The original Gakushuin ("Peers School") was not a university, and is not the same thing as the university by the same name it has subsequently begotten. This redirection of Gakushuin to Gakushuin University is a textbook example of Wikipedia fiddlers wrecking an article about a subject they know almost nothing about - now people are left with the incredibly misleading impression that Yukio Mishima (a Todai graduate) and Yoko Ono went to university at the age of 12 or something. 
86.140.113.167 22:25, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:The Mysterious Planet

message: The plot section is WAY too long!  I know little oin the subject and don't want to take this on myself, but can someone please reduce it?
Tetty2 22:23, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, someone has been putting up some pretty long plots that I've not had time to reedit myself either. Irritatingly someone else has been taking off tags I've put on other long Who articles Alastairward (talk) 10:50, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 
Talk:The Twin Dilemma

message: "His convulated explanation of how the regenerative process works"? Could we get a quote for this point, please; it sounds hilarious. NP Chilla 14:30, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Target novelisation 

message: I'm pretty sure this is not the first opening credit where two pictures are used for the doctor... one serious and one smiling... I seem to remember it happening in the opening credits for the third doctor, too, at least. 142.76.1.62 (talk) 22:53, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Opening titles did not feature the Doctor until the eleventh season. In that season (which was the last Jon Pertwee season), a full-length picture of the Doctor was used in the opening titles, but not a face-only, or head-and shoulders, pic. Further, it was a single photo, so did not change expression. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:03, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a correction, opening titles featuring an image of the Doctor started with Patrick Troughton way before season 11. DonQuixote (talk) 01:42, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh rats, my bad, you're quite right of course. Those used a single photo, no change of expression, which is I think what the original poster is querying. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:41, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening titles

message: Would it be noteworthy to include the fact that some of the computer graphics on display contain (in teletext form) a hidden message from, I think, Dave Chapman, the effects supervisor? I don't have a translation of it at the moment, but can rustle one up if I can find the screenshot. David (talk) 19:15, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: the message is as follows: "mon nom bog off you twit ass face bu"/"dr who rules ok so does daves progra". I'm not kidding, that's genuinely what two lines of the block teletext graphics in episode one translate as. David (talk) 22:53, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hidden message
Talk:Irving Braxiatel

message: I wonder... would it be original research to link "impending threat against Gallifrey" or "inevitable fall" to Time War (Doctor Who)?  I mean, in the metafictional sense it seems bloody obvious that that's what Alan Barnes was referring to when he wrote that plot point, but since Big Finish's license forbids them from using aspects of the new series, they probably can't admit that.  Thoughts? —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 02:30, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's probably the television Time War, but the "everything is canon" sprite in me says that it's actually the "War in Heaven". Either way, though, I think it's going to be OR. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 10:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Braxiatel's manipulations in ''Gallifrey'' series 3
Talk:Jason Kane (Doctor Who)

message: Just how much information do you need to remove the stub tag?  I think this article covers just about every appearance of Jason. Konczewski 03:24, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still a Stub?? 

message: There are a few details of Jason's biography that ought to be included, I think:
*His sometime career as an exotic gigolo to aliens of all shapes, species and genders
*His subsequent parlaying of that into a career as a successful author of xenopornography
*The period he spent trapped in a demon dimension (left there at end of NAs, eventually extracted in The Infernal Nexus, I believe
*Whatever happened to the woman he married in Deadfall?
I'd add these myself, but I can't remember which books most of them occurred in (and the Doctor Who Reference Guide, my usual resource for this sort of thing, appears to be offline at the moment).  I'm mentioning this here as much as an aide-memoire for myself as a hope that someone else will add them. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 07:22, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A few more details
Talk:The Fight (band)

message: Hi NJZombie.  Thanks for the edit on this.  I could not figure out a good way to keep people from confusing this pop punk band with this hardcore punk band from Long Island.  I know I was confused for a sec as they're both punk – but certainly not the same.  Do you know of any way to do this?  Perhaps there's another disambiguate template or method that does not create links. Regards. 
*As there is no article about the Long Island band, there is no need to disambiguate between the two at all. The purpose of disambiguation links are to help avoid confusion between two similarly titled articles, not to help people avoid confusion in their day-to-day life. If they start reading the article about the pop punk band, with the intent of reading about the Long Island band, they'll realize on their own that there is more than one band with that name and this one isn't a hardcore band. NJZombie (talk) 14:31, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any way to disambiguate a band that's not in an article?
Talk:Sylvia

message: Note the following:
#There is another given name disambiguation page, named Silvia.
#Neither of the two pages links to the other.
#This page contains several people whose names are spelled Silvia rather than Sylvia.
#There is also a page Sylwia.
All this is too confusing. I'd recommend either a merge of the articles (possibly with different sections for different spellings), or that the articles stay separated, are provided with links to each others, and are kept consistent with their separate names; which inter alia would imply moving the instances of Silvia to the article Silvia. JoergenB (talk) 16:14, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion with Silvia
Talk:Suicide pact

message: Thanks for providing a novel and painless way to die, in the way of CO from briquettes. It sounds much better than throwing myself under a train or grabbing live electric wires. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.45.119.4 (talk) 22:36, November 1, 2006 (UTC)
:People who contemplate violent suicide are not the same people that would kill themselves painlessly. __meco 10:21, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks 

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvia_divinorum#State_legislation Look at "Brett's Law". The link is broken, but I read it some months ago, and it basiclly says what's on the page; he killed himself via carbon monoxide poisoning. On a side note regarding the motives, he become highly nihilistic after using Diviner's Sage, S. Divinorum, a not unheard of occurance with ego-dissoving "psychedelic" psychotropics. FerventDove 08:00, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This section is incidental to the article and I have proposed that it be moved. Also there is another article altogether dealing with the subject of charcoal suicides. __meco 10:18, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charcoal 

message: There was a sentence basically saying that the largest pact EVER, involved "seven people."  This is obviously ridiculously incorrect, and the BBC source that was listed in fact said seven people died the largest suicide pact "in Japan".  Read carefully!-DMCer 08:00, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Largest number" deletion 

message: I was surprise to find that this didn't include any notable or famous examples of suicide pacts. I'm tired of being bold, so I'd rather just ask if others think this would be a good addition to the article? Dlabtot (talk) 07:54, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, like how about Adolf Hitler committing suicide with Eva Braun, that sure is famous. 110.20.130.141 (talk) 06:31, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

text: (Or maybe "Just like Romeo and Juliet", or "Just like Bogey and Bacall", i dunno what to think...)--Jerzy•t 10:51, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  No notable examples? 

message: Did I see Rocky and Bullwinkle? Jillianrunkle (talk) 12:53, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: (Or maybe "Just like Romeo and Juliet", or "Just like Bogey and Bacall", i dunno what to think...)--Jerzy•t 10:51, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Maybe a supposedly notable example?)
Talk:Death Comes to Time

message: Knowing that Jon Culshaw tends to portray George W Bush as a moron on Dead Ringers, I would suspect that it is not a coincidence that following the opening bars of the US National Anthem, there are a few notes from Dueling Banjos from Deliverance.  I would suspect that it is intentional - does anyone know of a source that verifies this fact? (For those who didn't notice it, but have the CD, check out track 12 on CD3) StephenBuxton (talk) 07:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deliverance Comes to Time

message: I assume the article must have been composed by people familiar only with the audio version. The version originally webcast was accompanied by animation. I have added this point. 68.146.64.9 (talk) 19:39, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Animation
Talk:Project Lazarus

message: Do we really need the disambiguation notice at the top of the page?  Is anyone really going to stumble upon this article while looking for the Biblical Lazarus or another use of the name? —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 14:13, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambiguation notice 
Template talk:Seattle Radio

message: What happened to the AM stations? All they show is FM.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.214.164.91 (talk) 00:28, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

message: KMTT 103.7 changed their call letters to KHTP on 9/12/2013.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.168.206.54 (talk) 15:22, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: KMTT is now KHTP

message: On March 16, 2016 KLCK-FM changed their call letters to KVRQ.76.27.198.89 (talk) 15:11, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: KLCK-FM is now KVRQ
Talk:Lip

message: This article cites medilexicon.com 7 times out of a total of 12 citations. Needs to be redone/expanded with authentic sources.
TheGarvitGupta (talk) 19:42, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing this out. I'd support any change you made in this regard, @. --Tom (LT) (talk) 11:55, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly cited article 

message: According to studies that measure the lips physically, men have larger lips. Women have overall smaller faces however and narrower lips. For whatever reason I've often seen it mentioned that women have larger lips though. I think it's partially due to a desire to legitimize changes in beauty standards, seeing as full lips are particularly trendy. Should I link some studies here that show the measured differences? Sleepyed (talk) 09:42, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Male/Female Lip Size

message: }
No need for separate articles - needlessly fragments and duplicates topic. Easily presented on a single article. Tom (LT) (talk) 22:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Support merging both to this article. Matthew Ferguson (talk) 18:40, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

text: Support merging both to this article and I combined the sections into one discussion. Two discussions is unnecessary duplication too :) Legacypac (talk) 03:47, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Upper lip]] and [[Lower lip]] into [[Lip]] 

message: I propose that Tubercle of the upper lip be merged into Lip. I think that the content in the Tubercle article can easily be explained in the context of Lip, and the Lip article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Tubercle will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. PepperBeast (talk) 03:09, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, merge. You can also leave a note about this at WP:Anatomy. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:39, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Ecohydrology

message: Started adding content to this stub.  It's currently a little biased toward soil moisture dynamics, my own particular area of knowledge.  Future contributions could address the energy balance, ecohydrology and evolution, and plant-atmosphere interactions in a ecohydrological context.
--Gmiller 23:00, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

message: Referrng to soil moisture and soil water content levels as levels of soil saturation is unatisfactory.  Saturation generally means "thoroughly full".  More accurate terminology should be employed. I do not have access to the references relied upon - do they literally employ the variable  "s" as meaning soil saturation? I hope not. -- Paleorthid 15:06, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "s" is indeed used in the hydrology community to denote the degree of saturation or unsaturation. It ranges from 0 to 1. It is the fraction of the voids occupied by water. Theta is the volumetric water content. Daniel Collins 00:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  saturation 

message: — Assignment last updated by Azadirachta indica (talk) 23:33, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Plant Ecology Winter 2023
Talk:Roy McWeeny

message: I hope I have done justice to Roy McWeeny. I started this page, but I had not realized I was no longer logged in. Please add to it.Bduke 23:00, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I tagged that article as a copyvio coming from this page.  I notified the original author who believes that the copying may be the other way around, and is investigating.  I have no reason to doubt him, and have reverted the page-blanking while this is being checked out. -- Whpq 16:28, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for that. I e-mailed the Royal Society of Chemistry and have got a reply that they have passed it on to the person who added the bio of Roy McWeeny to the RSC web site. Hopefully that person will reply to me soon. My recollection of writing this article is now clearer and I recall the sources I used. My fault then, in my first few days on WP, was to not reference the article. I will do that today. --Bduke 22:06, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Royal Society of Chemistry have agreed that their page on Roy McWeeny as the 2006 winner of the Spiers Memorial Medal is a copy of Wikipedia and they have agreed to remove it from their site. It will be replaced by a page on the 2007 winner, but that has not yet happened. --Bduke 12:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Copyvio
Talk:Wang Tiande

message: I've just nominated Jim Jiangbo (an almost completely similar article) for deletion. For now, I won't nominate this article for deletion, pending the vote on Jim Jiangbo. If that article is kept, this should probably be kept as well. If Jim Jiangbo is deleted, this should probably be deleted as well. Aecis praatpaal  23:05, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Small (cricketer)

message: John Small has gone through 10 edits and has exactly two lines to show for all that effort :-) Tintin 23:12, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[John Small]] 

message: Surely it was John Small who found the Prince Regent's coach stranded in a ditch and having helped to extricate it was presented with some clothes. In return he sent a bat and balls to the Prince thus helping to popularise the game at court.
Or have I just made that up? johnnybriggs (talk) 09:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Nearly right but you've merged two stories into one. The Hambledon players had a wagon which they used for travelling and this once overturned, the story being that Peter Stewart refused to disembark and somehow stayed inside while the vehicle was being righted again. Small received a violin from the Duke of Dorset and sent him two bats in return (this is in the text).  --Jack | talk page 06:37, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Stories