lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Edmeston, New York

message: The history series is fantastically detailed, but does it need to be on quite so many separate pages? - SimonP 00:59, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)
: Some of these 10-year periods approach the recommended limit for size.  I played around with varying the size of the periods, but even decades turned out to be easier to navigate.  Plus I'm getting more information and some pictures and don't want to have to rearange the pages again. Nonenmac 02:26, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Life on Display

message: The article for Away from Me should be merged here, since it may not grow beyond stub status. Please list any objections here, I will merge in about a week if I don't get any reasonable objections.--74.161.194.228 (talk) 03:44, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree with a merge. The song has a well-referenced charting history, as noted in the article, and that's one of the criteria for notability of songs. The fact it will remain a stub really isn't enough reason for a merge in my opinion; as long as an article is Verifiable and notable, it's in a good enough state for a wikipedia article; length of an article is not a requirement around here. Raven1977 (talk) 02:41, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree that it shouldn't be merged. It's notable enough and whether or not it grows from a stub can't be determind. Leave it alone.LoveLaced (talk) 04:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging [[Away from Me (Puddle of Mudd song)]]
Talk:Prince Michael of Greece and Denmark

message: Which prince is this "Prince Michael"? Please expand. YannisKollias 01:35, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If, as the article says, Prince MIchael's marriage to Marina was morganatic, how is it that their children have titles? Morganatic marriages prevent the transfer of a husband's rank and title to his spouse and children. Any ideas? (203.26.177.2 05:22, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: His daughters have titles, but not succession rights. Charles 15:00, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morganatic marriage 

message: In the copyright page for The White Night of St. Petersburg, the author's name is given as "Michel, Prince of Greece". Anyone have any idea why this spelling? Tualha (Talk) 15:31, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe his name may have been incompletely translated from French, which I believe is the language the book was written in first. Charles 15:32, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI: there should be some notation that "Prince Michael of Greece" is his legal name, ie his actual name, legally, per a legal decision in a court case initiated by him, not just per birth. I recall there being an interview with him and mention of this.Mowens35 17:13, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michael or Michel? 

message: The Greek State as a democratic one, following the principles of the French and American Revolutions, does not recognize Kings and other titles like them, since the abolition of Monarchy in 1974. This title is not recognized by the Greeks and has been added to this person on his own initiative.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kostandisloukos (talk • contribs) 10:07, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Feudal Titles in Greece

message: My understanding is that Michael is the only Greek royal to hold Greek citizenship. In order to do that he had to renounce all titles and honours and adopt a surname. He did so and adopted the name Michel de Grèce. As such, surely it is no longer appropriate refer to him as "Prince Michael" (unlike the other members of the Greek royal family, who maintain and assert their titles)? Vabadus91 (talk) 21:18, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renounced titles
Talk:Killing Fields

message: The banner image of skulls for the mobile version of the page (haven't been able to check yet on desktop) is from a Rwandan genocide memorial. This is even included in the caption. It shouldn't be used for an article on the Cambodian killing fields. Beggarsbanquet (talk) 11:26, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Beggarsbanquet Yeah. I second this. 95.208.242.163 (talk) 16:50, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate picture
Talk:Rumsfeld v. Padilla

message: I believe that in this case, the court has already ruled that the jurisdiction in New York was not correct, and that Rumsfeld was the improper custodian. The case needed to be brought before the Eastern Virginia district under Commander Marr (ships commander where Padilla is being held).
--24.130.189.156 03:21, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Mirthmobile

message: Not sure why people keep eliminating this article in favor of a redirect to the Wayne's World article. There are other wikipedia links to this page (the one I first discovered is on the page List of famous automobiles) and I believe that the information presented here has its own value and cannot be found in the Wayne's World article.
:The article could never be that large, though. Why not add it to the Wayne's World article? Mackensen (talk) 03:38, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Moral Code of the Builder of Communism

message: Mikkalai,
Thank you for your intriguing articles concerning contemporary (20th Century) Soviet history.  Like the article on the First Tractor, this article gave me insight into both the world view and day-to-day values of that time.  Yes, I do see similarities with the Ten Commandments, but what I find more interesting is what might be different.  For this reason, could you kindly elaborate on, say, the four values that were of a political nature?  Or, ideally, listing each of the values in the moral code one by one.
Unrelated to this is the whole issue of the Hammer-and-Cycle symbol.  I sense a great degree of ambivalence toward this symbol, not only among those in Anglophone cultures (ie: U.S.A.) but among those from the former Soviet Union.  This had led to debates in WikiPedia as to whether or not to show this symbol on USSR-related pages.  I feel that it should be shown, since this is an undeniable, and highly important part of contemporary world history.
I sense that the only shame that could have been associated with this symbol was in conjunction with Stalin.  I do not feel that one bad person should ruin a perfectly good symbol, one that is highly recognizable and uncompromising.  Every country has its controversial symbol.  The U.S.A. has the Confederate Battle Flag.  Although I am opposed to both its public display and official recognition, I do not feel it should be banned from encyclopedias.  If it were, it would allow all of us, including the youth who use WikiPedia, to forget that each and every one of us are fallable.
'nuff said  ----  Vonkje 00:13, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Please elaborate
Talk:Character group

message: Quick question: why can we not define the character group when G is not commutative? What fails? 219.117.195.84 (talk) 15:18, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well the problem depends on how you define it.  The set of group homomorphisms from any group to the multiplicative group of the field of complex numbers forms a group.  However, both the group G and the abelian group G/[G,G], define the same group of homomorphisms, so there is no generality gained in doing it this way.  A more general method is to consider the set of group homomorphisms from a group to the general linear group over the field of complex numbers.  Assuming you let the dimension of the matrices grow to any finite number, then you get a monoid under the tensor product, but no homomorphism to a group of dimension more than 1 will have an inverse.  Since this method also allows adding the homomorphisms using the tensor product, this actually turns the set into a ring, called the representation ring, which is fairly useful. JackSchmidt (talk) 15:28, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not commutative 

message: There is another definition of characters used in the literature which is slightly different that the one used in this article. These are homomorphisms
:\phi:G \to U(1)
which is a subgroup of \mathbb{C}^*. Algebraically, they contain the same information for many cases, but having U(1) as the target is useful while studying tori. For example, the dual torus of a torus V/\Lambda where \Lambda is a lattice can be found by looking at the character group
:\text{Hom}(\Lambda, U(1))
One reference is Birkenhake's Complex Abelian Varieties. Kaptain-k-theory (talk) 20:46, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add characters for U(1)
Category talk:Randomness

message: Is it really necessary to have both this category ("Randomness", first edited on Jan. 8, 2005) and :Category:Random numbers (June 2, 2004)? Conceptually, they certainly have a lot in common, which would seem to guarantee endless categorization problems going forward. Even now, "Randomness" is a subcategory of :Category:Probability and statistics and "Random numbers" is a subcategory of :Category:Cryptography, :Category:Probability and statistics, and :Category:Randomness, and both categories contain the articles Randomness and Random number. Ugh. I would prefer to just have this category and have it contain all the stuff relevant to both concepts. - dcljr 06:02, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not clear to me what this category is for and in what way it differs from the Probability and Statistics category. On the other hand, the Random Numbers category serves a clear purpose: it contains articles on the generation of (pseudo)random numbers. Thus, my first reaction is to delete this category. -- Jitse Niesen 12:39, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I decided to move all of Cateogy:Random numbers to this category instead, as randomness is not just about random number generation. A subcategory for random number generation could be created, though. But now at least we don't have concurrent overlapping categories, it's more a question of subcategories. Flammifer 13:37, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and boldly added this category to the :Category:Cryptography since randomness is a very important concept in cryptography in many ways. --David Göthberg 03:06, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Birthday Boy (2004 film)

message: Article does not discuss type or method of animation. Park is barely identified; while the article discusses awards it says nothing about the actual production of the film. I will fix the non-linked, not-called-out reference to AFTRS and add Park's name in the summary section.Sebum-n-soda (talk) 15:07, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues
Talk:Cardinal vowels

message: I have added a section to make it clear that phoneticians cannot work with an unlimited number of vowel qualities. I have cited Ladefoged's work, and it would make the point much more eloquently if I could add in his diagrams and the recording of Scots Gaelic he used. Unfortunately, I imagine copyright problems would rule against uploading this to Wikimedia.  RoachPeter (talk) 16:25, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That’s probably right, though you might as well receive a positive reply when asking Peter’s publishing house if they could kindly concede their rights regarding these few particular items to the public domain for educational, scientific and any other use. LiliCharlie (talk) 18:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limits of accuracy
Talk:Orders, decorations, and medals of Nazi Germany

message: I saw the template placed by  but the discussion does not appear to have been opened, so I'm starting it here. 
*Support merge. It seems that there's a lot of duplication between the two articles. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge of [[List of military decorations of Nazi Germany]] 

message: Preserving here by providing this link; my rationale was: "convert table to list; reduce excessive images & unsourced content". K.e.coffman (talk) 01:47, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edit 

message: While at it, why not also merge Political decorations of the Nazi Party here? PPEMES (talk) 21:15, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 2
Talk:Trinity Railway Express

message: I removed this sentence:
:It marked the first time in seventy years that passenger rail service from Dallas to Fort Worth was available.
What about the Amtrak Texas Eagle?  It makes that trip every day, and stops at both cities.  Granted, I have a feeling that not many people use it to commute between Dallas and Fort Worth, given the departure times.  But passenger rail service did already exist when the TRE opened in Ft. Worth.  (I wonder if the editor who made that statement meant something more specific?) Gyrofrog 06:50, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added a cleanup header because I think that this article can be vastly improved.  I'd like to see more details on rolling stock, including the initial set of refurbished RDCs, Refurbished 1970s Bi-Levels from GO Transit and their new stock from Bombardier.  I'll contribute as I have time.Tiktok4321 (talk) 13:03, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Let's Clean Up This Article

message: The new map that was added is slightly incorrect and a bit incomplete. AT Union Station, the Red Line to Westmoreland and Blue Line to Ledbetter aren't listed. THe Green Line to Buckner is, but the Green Line doesn't run its line to Union. At Victory, the Green Line is listed to Carrollton, which is corect, but the Green Line also runs to Buckner from there. I would have fixed it, but do not know how.FoUTASportscaster (talk) 00:42, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New map 

message: There was a "citation needed" from February 2010 on Wi-Fi service offered aboard the TRE.  I ran a Google search, and while there were a couple stories mentioning planned or previous Wi-Fi service, I could not find anything saying the TRE currently offers Wi-Fi on board.  I deleted the uncited sentence; if someone wants to put back something about past or future planned Wi-Fi, or has a source discussing current Wi-Fi, they're welcome to add it in.  I just wanted to get rid of the uncited claim, since it'd been there for so long. Shelbystripes (talk) 19:34, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wi-Fi
Talk:Red Guards (Finland)

message: The article states that striking farm workers were clashing with their employees. Is this the same event as the shooting of strikers by so called "fire brigades" that later were legalized as the paramilitary Protection Corps? The sentence seems obscure. /Johan M. Olofsson (talk) 09:16, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Employers, not employees. My mistake. Joe K. (talk) 17:48, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Events in Huittinen
Talk:Sophie Neveu

message: What is the point of this article? The Da Vinci Code page says more. Must be improved or deleted. Lapinmies 07:17, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of political parties in Moldova

message: The general rule on naming applies. That means: the parties are named in the English translation and the original native name is placed on the first line of the article unless the native form is more commonly used in English than the English form. Rationale and specifics: See: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English).
I've added MURM even though it's not yet officially a party; I didn't want it to stay a semi-orphaned article. —Nightstallion (?) 19:51, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

message: There needs to be some explanation about the alliances formed from time to time by the (mainly governing?) parties. – Kaihsu (talk) 15:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alliances of governing parties 

message: There have developed two major movements:
*a pro-Western, pro-Moldovan-Romanian Unionism and pro-European general Conservative liberalists
*a pro-Russian, Pro-Usatîi, Communist latently Eurosceptic, often anti-American and partly anti-liberal group of parties
Political camps                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          	Political camps
pro-Western and pro-European general liberal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             	pro-Russian, latently Eurosceptic, often anti-American and partly anti-liberal
Liberal Democratic Party of MoldovaDemocratic Party of MoldovaLiberal PartyEuropean People's Party of MoldovaDignity and Truth Platform PartyAcțiune și SolidaritateCentrist Union of MoldovaEcologist Green PartyLiberal Reformist PartyNational Liberal PartyUnionist Movement of the Republic of MoldovaRomanian National PartyRepublican Party of MoldovaFor Nation and Country Party	Party of Communists of the Republic of MoldovaParty of Socialists of the Republic of MoldovaPartidul NostruAgrarian Party of MoldovaChristian-Democratic People's PartySocialist Party of MoldovaSocial Democratic PartyȘor PartyPeople's Socialist Party of Moldova
Braganza (talk) 13:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Political camps
Talk:Tindersticks

message: I've moved information about the bandmembers here - there's no point having six separate substubs.  Grutness|hello?  05:28, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, but with the subsequent solo career, isn't it time Stuart A. Staples had his very own article? Ditto Dickon. --Sparklism 22:08, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm thinking of revamping the discography section to look something like the one for The Triffids. Does anyone object to this? Thanks --sparkl!sm  talk 20:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 

message: Tindersticks are probably most notable from an encyclopedic point of view for Stuart Staples' utterly incomprehensible singing, which has made them a byword for that sort of thing, at least among people who've heard of them at all. I think we should probably mention that somewhere. As with a lot of pop culture, I reckon Wikipedia needs to be a little more aware that musicians and actors and so on aren't just 'artists' but also phenomena. For example, you can't talk about Madonna as though she was just a person who sings songs but have to take into account that she managed to keep herself in the charts for however long it was by revamping her image all the time. By the same token, mention of Tindersticks makes a lot of people think 'incomprehensible lyrics', even if they can't name a single song, so we shouldn't pretend it isn't so.Sartoresartus (talk) 11:48, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Firstly, I don't agree that Staples' singing is incomprehensible, although it is noteworthy that the group have never included the printed lyrics on the albums, which implies that he wants people to form their own interpretations.  Secondly, in terms of this article, you can't just throw in some point about his singing without a reference to back it up.  Find something in a review somewhere that talks about his singing being indecipherable and we can take it from there. --Viennese Waltz talk  11:57, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Nor have I. What's the argument?Sartoresartus (talk) 03:44, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I don't understand that.  Nor have you what? --Viennese Waltz talk  07:37, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't 'thrown' anything in, though I may by and by.Sartoresartus (talk) 00:10, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomprehensible lyrics
Talk:Prince Yi Seok

message: The Joseon Dynasty recorded its history as Annals of Joseon Dynasty.
There is presently no official historian of the Korean royal family, and the Imperial records have ceased to be recorded since the Japanese invasions. Occasional references to the Korean Royal Family and its present charities and activities in the arts or in cultural preservation are found on websites on world royalty. 
* Standard references used for this site include:
* A Cultural History of Modern Korea, Wannae Joe, ed. with intro. by Hongkyu A. Choe, Elizabeth NY, and Seoul Korea: Hollym, 2000.
* An Introduction to Korean Culture, ed. Koo & Nahm, Elizabeth NJ, and Seoul Korea: Hollym, 1998. 2nd edition.
Further citations to appended.
Current articles on HIH the Crown Prince Yi Seok in English:
* Wall Street Journal, "Last Korean Prince" (qv. WSJ, subscription required; Google search:"South Korea's last living prince".)
* Korean Royal News (website), at the wwww.Royalty.nu homepage.
* Korea Times, "Korean Prince Living Vagabond's Life Campaigns for Royal Respect", again a sensational article.
* Korea Times, "Last Chosun Prince to settle in Chonju", an article which represents current matters more accurately. 08-26-2004 
* Yonhap News, "Last Prince of Joseon Dynasty Settles in Jeonju", an extremely accurate article on royal tourism initiatives in Korea.
* Washington Times, "Korean royalty seeks to restore ancestral pride", a sensational, overly dramatic and romanticized article.
Citations in Korean will be appended in a subsequent hyperlinked entry. 
En Francais.
A recent article in French was part of an Agence France Presse interview cited in Yahoo includes several new photographs.
Addenda.
(Note that there has been debate here on succession issues, as in all monarchy based sites in the 20th century and now; there are still claims of Stuart succession invalidating Queen Elizabeth and her heirs; as well as similar battles fought on other websites, magnified now by a great deal of fictional debate launched by the "DaVinci Code" that has thrown many links to the monarchies of the world into chaos; a link will be added on this forthcoming setting forth arguments on succession issues from a variety of historians and legalists, as well as citations from principle references sources as these are translated from Korean into English, and in the French entries as well.)
Hello! I am a greek royalist and try to find the email address of Korean Prince, Yi Seok, or mail address from Korean Royal Family. Can yoy help me? Thanks! Christos.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.87.18.225 (talk) 14:52, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  About references
Talk:Historic City of Ahmadabad

message: Add heritage walks, Manek Chowk etc. -Nizil (talk) 22:17, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Add
Talk:Break even analysis

message: I found this article difficult to understand, and think it could stand to be flushed out a bit.  I had preticular trouble with the graph: I couldn't figure out the difference between (TC) and (FC) nor where these functions were coming from.  The points (A,B,C) seem to mark the intersections between FC and the R1-R3 lines, but the description says that the points are plotted first, and then the R1-R3 lines are drawn, so I don't understand how the points are plotted. -Jwanders 09:48, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the critique. I have made some adjustments. I hope that helps. mydogategodshat 23:53, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''KL KL YH DIS SITE IS NOT VERY EDUCATIONAL AS IT DOESN'T HELP ME AT ALL (.)(.)''' 

message: This article is "correct" but incomplete.  Academic... it is not useful to people who would want to implement it.  
64.178.145.150 05:00, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Media:'''WAHGWAAN PEEPS WAS GUANIN YH BLESS INNIT''']]
Talk:Leo I

message: LEO is also an acronym for Low Earth Orbit RPellessier | Talk 10:06, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: True; but what would "Low Earth Orbit I" mean? Jeff Medkeff | Talk 01:10, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)
Oops! RPellessier | (Talk) 03:42, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Low Earth Orbit