lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Paul B. Kantor

message: PBK is one of the most highly cited authors in the field of Information Science (according to SCI and several research papers on the topic), and has received a number of awards.  His biography has appeared in Who's Who in America, and in Who's Who in the World.  Thus he is arguably a "notable academic".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulbkantor (talk • contribs) 
:Hello there. The appropriate place to argue your case is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul B. Kantor, where a debate is being held on whether to keep or remove this article. Your comments are of course welcome there!   --Nehwyn 17:23, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If the lack of consensus on deletion is an indication of some interest in keeping, why is it hidden away with no mention (dab hatline) at the violinist Paul Kantor?  I'm not going to bother adding it, sinco nobody else seems to care if this can be found.  Gene Nygaard (talk) 14:58, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hidden away
Talk:Upgrade U

message: Previous editors of this article appear to have been under the impression that the song was, or is planned to be, released as a single. It isn't, and I've just overhauled the article to reflect this. 
Please make sure everything you put into the article is verifiable and confirmed by reliable sources. One of the bad things about these pop song articles is how overzealous fans like to insert a whole load  of inaccuracies and unsourced rumours and speculation based on what they read in their crystal balls. Extraordinary Machine 22:05, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not released as a single 

message: wasnt upgrade u releade on the 12" thing before listen? doesnt that mean it goes before it on the timeline? 24.218.70.219 21:44, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hold Up!

message: "Upgrade U" was not released as an official single from B'Day. The 12" was released at request of DJs and such, but it was never officially promoted or sent to radio stations as a single. To call it a single is simply misleading.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.1.175.126 (talk) 21:35, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be removed from singles chronology 

message: Hi
During the copyedit a few things came to light that may need attention:
;Music structure, theme and lyrics
*"moderate hip-hop song" - I do not know what that means, it could probably be better explained. I suspect most would imagine it is referring to the tempo, though I am pretty sure that is not what is intended!
;Chart performance
*Not sure about the UK charts listing. The official website does not hold info about it  and I cannot find any press reports about it's position on the UK charts; moreover, I would have assumed that it not being released in the UK would preclude it from being listed. Digital downloads charts would obviously be different, though there is no info on that in the article.
;Music video
*"on BET's 106 & Park" - what is BET?
;Live performances and covers
*"2 Pistols' debut single "She Got It" which features T-Pain phrases "let me upgrade u" has been used on his 2008 debut album, Death Before Dishonor". - This is a bit of a mess. I cannot tell which refers to which; is 2 Pistols a bloke, if so is it him or T-Pain whose phrases "let me upgrade u" are used on 2 Pistols' album or T-Pains? (also, does the phrase really "belong" to T-Pain? I thought it would be beyonce's phrase ...)
*In fact most of that paragraph is a little off - they are uses of the phrase, not even covers, and really seem as if they should not be there as they appear to be trivia. Indeed the only one that looks as if it might belong is the Lil Wayne one, which uses the song's beat.
;Credits and personnel
*Artist first, thing they did second (as pointed out to me during a FAR).
First run done, any problems feel free to get in touch! Chaosdruid (talk) 23:35, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  GOCE copyedit October 2011
Template talk:Shrek (franchise)

message: This template needs to be updated - templates don't look like this anymore.  I will update this. —  « hippi ippi » 03:16, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks better, eh? —  « hippi ippi » 03:38, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: Um... I think it should go.  Or at least, a new article should be made listing all the video games and a link for this article to be placed in "other" to save space.  Should this be done for Music as well,. using the :Category:Shrek music link? —  « hippi ippi » 08:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video Games 

message: Please don't add links to Shrek 5 until an article exists (which won't happen until there is significant verifiable information available on that film). There's no purpose in listing or linking to an article which doesn't exist. Zetawoof(ζ) 21:54, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shrek 5 

message: The video game templete is all over the place! I'm gonna sort them in order of when they come out, so you don't have the confusion of Shrek, Shrek 2, god knows how many more games and then finally Shrek the third. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 17:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: RE, I have made changes to this templete, and can I please say that they are all valid, as I've named these games IN ORDER, of gamespot so please don't delete them. Thankyou, mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 17:49, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

text: 2RE, My edit on the Shrek Video games templete was a bit of a mess, so this link  should be used by a skilled wikipedian, to clean up, and re-organize (in order of date of releace never the less I might add.) the templete in the video game section of the Shrek Templete. Thankyou, mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 14:03, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Video Game Templete?!

message: In this revision I added a color scheme to this template. It has since been reverted. It is very common for navbox templates to feature a custom color scheme. The Simpsons, Disney, Six Flags and Universal Studios Florida among many others all have custom color schemes. When the navbox is included in a large stack such as that on Shrek 4-D, I think that the color scheme plays an important role in easy identification. Does anyone else think that a custom color scheme for this template would be good? Themeparkgc  04:34, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color scheme 

message: Shouldn't Puss in Boots be separate from the actual Shrek films? Perhaps there should be a main series portion and a spin-off portion. I would do this myself, but I really don't know how to edit templates. Could somebody address this issue?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DietBrain (talk • contribs) 23:17, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. This kind of organization had been already in use, before somebody disagreed and merged all films: . --Carniolus (talk) 15:48, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Problem with the Boots
Talk:Beyond Tears

message: Would the person saying that this article isn't formatted properly please stop putting the notice up and just do it themselves. I did what I thought was right buit obviously I can't do that so someone else can jolly well do it. Dibs on the person putting the notice up as its them who has the problem.Mangwanani 17:42, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

message: is this a biography? the article, as written, is unclear as to wether or not it's biographical, or fictitious. In the mean time, i've stub-sorted it into the Non-fiction book stubs category. -Ohms law 18:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography? 
Talk:Lindsay and Crouse

message: Maybe a stupid question, but is this actress's name related to those folks ? 82.230.180.185 17:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. As the article notes, she's Russel Crouse's daughter and her full name—Lindsay Ann Crouse—is an intentional tribute to "Lindsay and Crouse." Dpbsmith (talk) 23:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I should have read the article, mind. 82.230.180.185 11:40, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Lindsay Crouse]] 

message: Replaced the term libretto with book.  The former is more associated with grand opera and includes the lyrics (as in grand opera everything is sung including the dialog ("recitative") there is less of a distinction.  The term book is always used in regard to Broadway musicals, the three distinct writing credits being book, music and lyrics, and are listed in that manner in published books, scores, programs, and posters.  Jszigeti (talk) 17:26, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book vs libretto
Talk:Teardrop Park

message: This is a start for the Teardrop Park article. Somebody from MVVA or the Battery Park City Authority could probably add more complete references.Farmhouse121 17:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article start

message: It appears that either this page was written using content from http://www.goodmagazine.com/section/Features/nature_playgrounds , or vice versa. 66.95.123.6 (talk) 15:17, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncredited Source?

message: Why is it called "Teardrop" Park?--DThomsen8 (talk) 21:13, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the park
Category talk:Fair use

message: As of 2006/11, This category includes mostly, but not all, wikipedia-specific fair use entries. That needs to be fixed--wikipedia fair use stuff should be segregated to wikipedia project categories, and "fair use" as a general category should be reserved for encyclopedia entries relating to fair use. For now I'm integrating it into the copyright law cat hierarchy, even though it includes off-topic material. --LQ 17:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  wikipedia vs. general fair use 

message: * copyright: important fair use cases should be classed here; also articles for each of the four fair use factors; also we need an article for the history of fair use; also an international perspectives article for doctrines around the world similar to, related to, or based upon US copyright fair use, hopefully explaining the commonalities and differences.
* trademark: important tm fair use cases should be classed here 
--lquilter 20:52, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: needed work on category
Talk:SS Murata

message: Srs:
Gostaria de estar realiando um período de testes neste time que me chamou a atenção pela estrututa e organização.
Sei que não sou nenhum Romario ( admiro ) bastante o anão, mas tenho meu valor e sei jogar uma bola legal...
Quem sabe vcs. não chegam a conslusão do meu potêncial e me deixam fazer um período de treinamento para analisar a minha condição física.
tenho 42 anos
tenho 1.75  de altura
posição: Lateral esquerdo
chuteira: 38/39
Clubes: Coritiba FC; Rio Branco; Operario Ferroviario...
Sou casado e tenho 02 filhos que são amantes da bola...
Aguardo retorno sobre a minha proposta...
Gracias,
Osni Renato de Oliveira
Meu telefone para contato 41 3329-8556 / 41 91831176
e-mail: renato_40.diplomata@terra.com.br
Cidade: Curitiba - Paraná - Brasil  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.30.151.23 (talk) 20:35, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  contratação... 
Talk:Air India FC

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. per discussion consensus and title consistency. FYI to nominator, this should have been done as one single RM discussion, with all the titles listed. But it's easier to just go ahead and do the moves now. (non-admin closure) — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 10:42, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Air India F.C. →  – Consistency with current naming conventions in :Category:Football clubs in India , :Category:Indian Super League teams and so on. Footwiks (talk) 06:40, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 11:31, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Many Indian Football Club article titles have FC or SC or AC, But Some Indian Football Club article titles have F.C. or S.C. or A.C. So In order to unify disordered article titles, I requested many title moves. What's wrong with that?Footwiks (talk) 14:51, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 August 2021
Talk:FC Amkar Perm

message: Who is always editing this article into Amkar Sperm? Getting tired of it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.84.94.140 (talk) 17:02, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Talk:PFC Krylia Sovetov Samara

message: This article has been renamed from FC Krylya Sovetov Samara to FC Krylia Sovetov Samara as the result of a move request.
 - consensus for move. Keith D (talk) 23:49, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Therefore, as stated by the policy, "In cases where there is some ambiguity as to the official spelling of a club's name in English, the name most commonly used by the English-language media should be used (as determined using the number of hits at Google News).", the article should be located at Krylya not Krylia due to its Google news hits. пﮟოьεԻ 57 01:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

text: *Comment But then we've got WP:RUS and Krylia is the correct transliteration from Russian. BanRay 10:09, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

text: **Eh? The policy states that я is transliterated as ya, which would give Krylya as well... пﮟოьεԻ 57 11:38, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *Nah, that would make Kryliya in fact since "ия = iya", which is usually simplified as ia BanRay 11:46, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *But there is no и in the name - it's Крылья. пﮟოьεԻ 57 11:57, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *I'm transliterating it based on how it sounds, not how it looks since "ь" is usually omitted from transliteration (sometimes can be transliterated as '). Krylya makes Крылыа (sounds horribly Ukrainian). BanRay 12:06, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *The closest you can get would be Kryliya, but that's too complicated and can be simplified as Krylia, so I'm opting for the latter version. It's also the most common way of tranliterating the word "Крылья", getting five times more google hits than Krylya Sovetov. BanRay 12:12, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *OK, thanks for the explanation. From my experience with Hebrew, I know transliteration can be an arse, especially when there are "traditional" methods of doing it which are actually crap. пﮟოьεԻ 57 13:09, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *So true, the problem is that there are lots of exceptions that aren't covered by traditional rules. BanRay 14:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:FC Lokomotiv Moscow

message: they have puma kits now  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.63.18 (talk) 06:39, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn’t this page be moved to “ FC Lokomotiv Moskva”? Thegameshowlad (talk) 09:29, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: “Lokomotiv coach says he is leaving role in protest against Russian invasion” . That's about Markus Gisdol, who is currently not listed in the article. ◅ Sebastian 20:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coach leaving role in protest
Talk:Oakley Court

message: Can anyone verify which St Trinians movies this house appeared in?  I have fast-forwarded through the following and I don't believe it is the building used in any of them:
*The Belles of ...
*Blue Murder at ...
*The Pure Hell of ...
*The Great ... Train Robbery'.
Thegn 17:47, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Brunel University article says the The Belles of St Trinian's was filmed there. Don't know if this is correct. The building does look quite different round the other side. Verica Atrebatum 21:13, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Calcutta South Club

message: I've reorganized the page and added some details. Is it still stub-class? What needs to be done to improve it? KeeYou Flib (talk) 03:10, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still a stub?
Talk:Fc receptor

message: I have noticed that the table in this article is almost an exact copy of a figure in 'Immunobiology by Janewat et al. Is it permitted to reproduce other people's work on Wikipedia without referencing it?
:Thank you for your comment. I can imagine your doubts, but I do not have that book and since I made the table, I'm pretty sure I did not use it. I gathered the information from different sources. Feel free to add references though!SanderB 23:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I

message: I note that there is also a 'Fc-receptor' article.  Perhaps the latter should be merged with this one.Duncan.france 12:14, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fc-receptor 

message: With requests for merger on both these pages I decided to go ahead with it!  This article now needs a big clean up though, to get rid of redundant info and to possibly reformat the table.  I'll try and get around to these things, but if you get here first, feel free to take control of the driver's seat!!  Ciar 05:29, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fc receptor/Fc-receptor merge

message: I oppose this merger.  The Fc region is part of an antibody so I feel it would be best placed in the antibody article if it is not suitable to have its own page.  Ciar 18:11, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: An Fc receptor is a distinct entity from the Fc region of an antibody that it is designed to bind. IMO The two articles should be cross-referenced, but not merged. bwbrian 17:46, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger of [[Fragment crystallizable region]] into Fc receptor
Talk:Maharashtra Open

message: I can see that offially this tournament is called as Tata Open Maharashtra on ATP official page http://www.atpworldtour.com/en/tournaments/pune/891/overview.
Also, 2018 page of the tournament is already renamed. However, there is already a redirection page with name "Tata Open Maharashtra" and hence movement of page is not working. If we agree to rename, we can request for movement of the page to admins.
Ullhas.kolhe (talk) 08:32, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion in progress at Talk:2023 Tata Open Maharashtra#Move request. Andrewa (talk) 18:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename page to : Tata Open Maharashtra
Talk:Jay Manalo

message: I included the latest news on Jay's arrest and bail.
--Florentino floro 07:23, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: =
Talk:FC Khimki

message: If anyone follows this club and could help out, it would be nice to have articles for all of its players. matt91486 05:16, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk
Talk:FC Kuban Krasnodar

message: 1 league - 1-th league - 1st league - russian first league - russian first division?
*and what is neigrovye?--Diwas (talk) 16:54, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 1 league - 1-th league - 1st league - russian first league - russian first division?
Talk:FC Lada-Tolyatti

message: Dumb question but is the club affiliated with the car company? Recury 20:03, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, of course. According to  (see the right column for the VAZ logo), VAZ and Tolyatti administration are general sponsors of the club. Conscious 09:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I just wasn't making the connection between VAZ and Lada. I'll try to make it a little clearer in the article, but if I mess something up, just revert me. Recury 20:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lada cars
Talk:The Nine Muses

message: Wow, it's about time that someone started an article on The Nine Muses.  I have a feeling that someone extremely dedicated to 18th-century studies spearheaded this initiative. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bard of Cornwall (talk • contribs) 17:50, 12 November 2006  (UTC)
Hail, Bard! With your interest in Catherine Trotter, you must be pretty dedicated yourself.
scribblingwoman 00:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Durand Cup

message: I don't think so, the Welsh Cup was first contested in 1877 Blogdroed (talk) 00:03, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: SEVEN YEARS ON ... and still people are peddling the obvious error that this is the third oldest competitoon in the world! Please check the entry for the FAW Cup and the IFA Cup for further proof! Blogdroed (talk) 23:45, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:   if you can find sources that this is the third oldest competition, shouldn't you quote them in the article rather than claim to have them in the edit summary? The Welsh Cup was first played in 1877. The Irish Cup was first played in 1881 - both of these are older than the Durand Cup. Blogdroed (talk) 23:51, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I managed to find this. But then I found this. I am not sure which is right but RSSSF make a good point. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 04:01, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure I could find articles which claim the Durand Cup to be "the third oldest tournament" - they will most likely have carried the error on from this page! There is, however, no doubting the FACT that the Welsh Cup and Irish Cup are older. Blogdroed (talk) 07:30, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You know... I believe you are right and I am sorry for being to haste about it. Now we need to see if it the oldest in Asia. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 09:01, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:   Durand's official website says 3rd oldest.   S a  h a  18:46, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:   It doesn't make it a fact! Even the Wiki page linked to in the article dismisses the claim! It is NOT the 3rd oldest tournament in the World! Blogdroed (talk) 12:44, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: THIRD OLDEST?
Talk:DY Patil Stadium

message: No 1 stadium in India  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssatam (talk • contribs) 08:01, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Here it says 
Should it not be in the article?
Raju 07:57, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion 
Talk:Field hockey in India

message: Shouldn't this be "Field Hockey in India?"  Afterall, to most native speakers of English, "hockey" is played on ice, not on grass.   
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_English-speaking_population  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.247.188 (talk) 19:27, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Talk:FC Argeș Pitești

message: This must be one of the poorest articles on the site for grammar. Does anyone know enough about this club in English?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pasadena (talk • contribs) 15:03, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar
Template talk:All That

message: The colors on this template are way too bright.  See WP:COLOR and [list of optimal colors used here].  Thanks.  --  Wikipedical 17:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Colors

message: i added this on the template cause since they arent produced by schneider, they star the some of the cast members. If anyone has a problem with this let me know. thanks.--Wikialexdx (talk) 04:20, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  secondary shows 

message: I'm not sure what at all is wrong with this change- what is currently being labelled as 'Seasons' is infact the LoE article, so 'Episodes' would be more accurate to use here. There also really isn't anything correct with using the templates for The Simpsons and/or South Park for the reverting reason: maybe the reason those are set-up that way is because those are shows with 20+ seasons, in comparison to All That, which only has 10/11 seasons.
Even looking at the template for The Simpsons, it also labels the two LoE articles under 'Episodes' with the main LoE article wikilinked with the same word, so even just going by how those two templates are setup, my change would still be correct. Magitroopa (talk) 17:22, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes