Talk:Wimbledon

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support: Per nom. —Wknight94 (talk) 13:56, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Thе Wimbles should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 25#Thе Wimbles until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.  1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:07, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Thе Wimbles" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Wimbledon, London which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 19:01, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI, the discussion was closed as no change. Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: Simone de Almeida and James Hunter should be added to the notable residents list because they are Laureates representing Richmond. Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:EAD1:7B00:55D2:F733:B8C4:AE41 (talk) 14:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request edit 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: No consensus for the disambiguation page, but tournament moved to Wimbledon Championships. Since the two moves were for different reasons, they are to have separate conclusions.
* The primary topic debate failed to reach a consensus. The opposition implicitly argued that the namesake town had competitive long-term significance and lack of confidence on the usage while the tournament is not running, while the supporters relied on the brute force of pageviews evidence. Nobody can budge. A rerun of this issue in another RM could help clarify an answer.
* Participants generally rejected the original proposed tournament title, and multiple opposers in addition to a supporter and a neutral party supported Wimbledon Championships instead; the appeal of this other suggestion across disparate opinions of these participants made this appear to be the title with the firmest consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 05:50, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose. Works fine as it is. The Championships is even at the top of the disambiguation page. Furthermore, people tend to google it, and will find the correct articles pretty easy. Sine Cera, Infobesity (talk) 12:16, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: *Do you have any evidence that the tennis tournament is not the primary topic? The tournament is currently in the news now, but even excluding current events, Pageviews show a clear PT. Natg 19 (talk) 07:22, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

text: *These arguments in support of a move have already been movedrefuted.Tvx1 09:38, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: *Huh? What does this mean? Natg 19 (talk) 07:23, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 July 2022 

message: There is also a Wimbledon close to where I live.
https://www.google.com.au/maps/place/Wimbledon+NSW+2795
It's even smaller than Hobbys Yards but we have articles for even smaller places in the US, so maybe... Andrewa (talk) 00:47, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added it, it seems to be legally recognized. Crouch, Swale (talk)  07:38, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wimbledon, New South Wales