lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Vic Moore

message: I can't find anything on this guy. Does anyone know his hight or weight? Only thing i can find to compare his size to is his battle with bruce lee, and that is not much to go on.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:9:5900:424:DCB7:A2DF:C2A2:B3AA (talk) 05:42, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: With respect to the original author, I would have to assert that the entire "speed test" section is factually incorrect, and given that video evidence exists which disproves the claims made herein, should it not be edited to represent matters more accurately? Unedited footage (and also footage which has subsequently been restored) from the 1967 Longbeach Karate International is widely available across several platforms.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.149.142.16 (talk) 14:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speed Test Details are blatantly erroneous.
Talk:Gift Grub

message: The paragraph about WWE is rubbish and has been malicioiusly edited.
I can't remember any wrestling sketches off the top of my head. Anyone else know different? Alib999 13:13, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Monday, November 06, 2006 : "Gift Grub stars in stand-up row over new CD money" in the Irish Examiner. --candle•wicke 01:36, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oliver Callan
Talk:Tasbeeh

message: The articles  and  are the about the same thing and are the same Arabic word, romanised differently. 'Tasbeeh' has been around since 23 April 2006, and 'tasbih' started on 15 July 2007. Previously, the article now at 'misbaha' was at 'tasbih'. — Gareth Hughes 13:43, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. There was really only one line in here that wasn't already covered at tasbih or misbaha, so I move it and redirected this to tasbih – cacahuate  talk 03:35, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Operational Reactor Safeguard Examination

message: I am disputing the writing style of Subman758. I agree most of what he said but the writing style is sensationalist. I have written him on his talk page about it and I am waiting to hear back from him before anymore editing. Webprofessor
Ummm...I don't see anything wrong with the article or writing style...?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.56.129.195 (talk) 17:31, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sensationalist Writing Style Dispute
File talk:Microsoft-Staff-1978.jpg

message: On a serious note... Is it worth replacing this with a better quality version, such as This? I mean without the green artifacts? Fosnez 16:47, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Better quality version

message: omg now that picture is funny :D
--84.47.24.103 15:45, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The picture of Bill Gates is just hilarious. Khoikhoi 00:47, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  OMFG LOL 

message: I wished I could have worked with gates... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheQaq0 (talk • contribs) 03:19, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Couldn't that easily be fixed with a copy of POHOTOSOP? Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 18:47, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awsome 

message: The full set of 20th century evil nerds! It cannot and mustn't be used! Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 18:44, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unfair to use

message: The non-free use rationale was disputed for some articles.  At DRV, the deleting admin acknowledged that the rationale was good enough for at least one article where the image was in use.  That is enough to keep the image.  If the rationale is not good enough for other articles, the solution is to remove the image from those articles, not to delete the image.  GRBerry 13:51, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-free use rationale
Talk:Adaptive step size

message: The article by Ilie at al is controversial, see the paper by E Novak and H Wozniakowski (two respected researchers in numerical analysis) on arxiv:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0904.4441
Szepi (talk) 06:27, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the paper by Ilie et al be cited? 

message: There was a notice dating from 2009 that this article contained 'how to' content (contrary to WP:NOTHOWTO). This is true, but I have removed the template because I don't think this is a problem for the article. For articles such as this one on mathematical methods, a 'how to' may be the best way to illustrate the method being talked about. Of course, there should be discussion about other aspects of the method as well -- who came up with it, when it is used, and so on. --jftsang 16:02, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  'How to content' 
Talk:Shipton, North Yorkshire

message: There is no question that the village was around at the time of the Domesday Book, but when you put it in the OpenDomesday website search, it comes back with no entry, though refers you to the Phillimore translation, hence my slightly vague referenced entry. When you look at the images of the relevant extracts on the site, my untrained eye can't make out any entry that looks like Shipton or its old name of Hipton. The original text was unreferenced but more certain in its tone than it is mentioned in the DB. Has anyone got a definitive, referenced, answer? Rimmer1993 (talk) 21:44, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Domesday Entry
Talk:Crest Girls' Academy

message: This is clearly written by the school itself as it is in the first person. It reads like a prospectus not a wikipedia article
Streona (talk) 23:52, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: STYLE

message: Since the 3 previous academies have now combined into The Crest Academy, and this article's content has been updated to reflect that, I suggest moving (renaming) the article accordingly. Thoughts and comments are appreciated. CrowTalk 20:02, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename Article?
Talk:Peter Phillips (disambiguation)

message: It is not obvious that Princess Anne's son is clearly the most notable person of this name, should he be the primary meaning on Wikipedia? PatGallacher 13:57, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How is it "obvious"? I believe he is the most famous person of this name, certainly in the UK and to be honest abroad as well. Indeed Peter Mark Andrew Phillips should be at Peter Phillips really. There are only 3 other people with articles of this name, a sociologist, economist and artist, and I do not believe any of these are well known at all, especially the first two. --UpDown 14:47, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
File talk:I35W Bridge.jpg

message: This photo looks like it is viewed from the south. --72.220.227.42
: You are correct.  The concrete archways on the other side are the 10th bridge.  (SEWilco 05:44, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay - I fixed the description. (not sure if it'd transfer here though) - Looking north/viewed from south. --Addict 2006 15:51, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect viewpoint
Talk:Jeff Rich

message: Why did he leave Status Quo?
From the quotation at the end, I'd infer that he started to lose his hearing. But this should be spelled out if it is the case. Widmerpool (talk) 23:28, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The font is not appropriate for Wikipedia.  Do change it. Sposato (talk) 17:06, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Font 

message: I appreciate that Jeff now makes a living teaching drums to kids in schools, but the link to his website in the middle of the article was blatant advertising, I've removed it and had a general tidy up. Jacobsdad (talk) 11:29, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising
Talk:Print media in Omaha, Nebraska

message: I want to merge three articles: Television stations in Omaha, Nebraska and Radio stations in Omaha, Nebraska, and Print media in Omaha, Nebraska to create a more comprehensive article called Media in Omaha. I think that would be a better type of article for a media market the size of Omaha, and allow readers a more comprehensive scan. – Freechild (¡!¡!¡!¡) 21:22, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Regina Leader-Post

message: The article is missing the year when the Leader and Post merged. 68.146.47.196 14:11, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: When did merger occur?
Talk:Media in Omaha, Nebraska

message: I want to merge three articles: Television stations in Omaha, Nebraska and Radio stations in Omaha, Nebraska, and Print media in Omaha, Nebraska to create a more comprehensive article called Media in Omaha. I think that would be a better type of article for a media market the size of Omaha, and allow readers a more comprehensive scan. – Freechild (¡!¡!¡!¡) 21:22, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:1st Horse (Skinner's Horse)

message: I added the category "British colonial regiments" to this page. Please correct it if this category isn't applicable, or let me know and I'll find/create a more appropriate category. thanks! kateshortforbob 14:18, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category

message: Many army units all over the world have been issued with yellow coats, for instance the Spanish dragoons in the 18th and early 19th centuries, and "The Canaries" (Neuchatel Battalion), a Swiss infantry regiment in Napoleon's army (and the yellow coat in homage to the local coat of arms).
:"http://servicios.elcorreo.com/especiales/guerra-de-la-independencia-1808/uniformes-espanoles/pages/dragon-regimiento-almansa.htm"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.85.148.202 (talk) 18:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: "http://www.kronoskaf.com/syw/index.php?title=Lusitania_Dragoons"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.85.148.202 (talk) 12:25, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: And in the 17th century Spanish army there was an infantry regiment called Amarillos Viejos (Old Yellowcoats).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.85.148.202 (talk) 18:12, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yellow uniforms, unique in the world...
Talk:David Wright (disambiguation)

message: Move David Wright (baseball) to here (an admin would have to assist) and move the contest of this page to David Wright (disambiguation) (which currently redirects to here). Enigmamsg 20:50, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I second that motion. Mad Thinker (talk) 13:04, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

text: This discussion has been superceded by the requested move. 76.66.193.224 (talk) 03:37, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:David Wright (baseball) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 00:00, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:St Thomas' Church, Strasbourg

message: (− but yesterday a King!)
--Edelseider (talk) 18:03, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Just for clarity: we see now St Thomas' Church, Strasbourg, an English format for a French church. Tired ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:17, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Based on the model of a church in Copenhagen, Denmark. Sounds reasonable. --Edelseider (talk) 18:27, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

text:  And, by the way, when the church was built, Strasbourg was German... So, jawohl. :) --Edelseider (talk) 18:28, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

text: Yes, this is better, and should be the normal formula. Johnbod (talk) 18:37, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  The "formula" works when an article is [only] about a church building, but not when the parish is also a topic. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  But the article, as far as I can see, is only about the church building. Unlike :fr:Chapitre de Saint-Thomas and its subordinates, :fr:Stift and :fr:Médiathèque protestante de Strasbourg (all three articles should be translated, btw.) --Edelseider (talk) 10:33, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, but "formula" suggested (to me) that it would be good to be used generally, and I don't think so. For my church, it would not be a common name, and simply wrong for the parish part. If "St Thomas' Church, Strasbourg" is a common name for this church, I don't know ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:50, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Tis done 

message: Without that discussion above, I wouldn't have thought of writing this article: Gottfried von Hagenau, so thank you everyone! Edelseider (talk) 08:33, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  A gift for everyone 
Talk:Whizzgo

message: Per Wikipedia policy, "Articles about companies and products are acceptable if they are written in an objective and unbiased style. Furthermore, all article topics must be third-party verifiable...." As it is, this article cites no third-party sources and is written like promotional copy. Neutral point of view is one of the core policies of Wikipedia; phrases like "How does it work? Like a dream!" are not NPOV. --Moonriddengirl 14:31, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement on Wikipedia

message: An editor had earlier today moved this article to "Whizzgo", by copying it there to replace the redirect (ie not using the formal "Move" process which preserves the history of the page as is necessary for GFDL reasons, I believe).  
But I also think that "Whizzgo" is the correct name for the article, as Wikipedia:Name#Use_standard_English_for_titles_even_if_trademarks_encourage_otherwise specifies.  It makes an exception for items where the second letter is the only one capitalised, like eBay, but not for other names written in CamelCase (which seems to be a self-referential exception!).
So (a) I believe that the correct name for this article is Whizzgo, and (b) if you want to move (ie change the name of) an article, please use the "move" button at the top of the screen, rather than doing a cut and paste job.  PamD (talk) 11:25, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I also note that the logo was replaced after being deleted as lacking a non-free use rationale (see above) but without this being provided, so have now added it at .  As the rationale specifies the article in which the logo is being used, if the article is moved that will also need to be updated. PamD (talk) 12:05, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undoing move to WhizzGo
Talk:Suttons Bay, Michigan

message: There are many business in Suttons Bay that have been popping up since the mid 1970's that have established the seasonal economic community.  A community that would not exist without them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.13.71.110 (talk) 19:26, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments welcome

message: The redirect Suttons Bay, Michgan has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Voxl (talk) 23:58, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Suttons Bay, Michgan]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Music workstation

message: This History section appears to be greatly improved, and addresses most of the issues raised below. -- 18:48, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The HISTORY section needs to be rewritten. I can start working on that tomorrow. 【 MqaTalk 】 15:23, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

text: I did a complete rewrite of the "History" section. It is still very small, but at least I removed all the inaccurate and irrelevant information. I also did a rewrite of the "Operation" sub-section, and replaced some inaccurate information. 【 MqaTalk 】 15:23, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: On section "Third generation music workstations", the concept of Groove machine had been explained as if an invention of Roland Corporation in 1996.
However, it is clearly biased.
In truth, the concept of Groove machine was already realized in 1980s as:
:* Linn 9000 (1984, designed by Roger Linn)
:* E-mu SP-12 (1985)
:* SCI Studio 440 (1986)
:* Simmons SDX (1987)
:* E-mu SP-1200 (1987)
:* Akai MPC60 (1988, designed by Roger Linn)
:etc
and, especially the products by E-mu and Akai have established the genre in late 1980s. (Note: it is almost simultaneously with the popularization of "Second generation music workstations" by the release of Korg M1).
Biased explanations should be removed and fixed. --Clusternote (talk) 05:27, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV: Roland-centric explanation on section "''[[Music workstation#Third generation music workstations|Third generation music workstations]]''" 
Talk:Great Stork Derby

message: "Great stork derby", it is easy to understand "great" & "derby", but why "stork"? can someone clarify this? Jackzhp 14:42, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: the name

message: Any information on how many babies were attributed to the derby? 82.81.239.131 (talk) 08:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  demographics
Talk:Clitoria ternatea

message: To the editor who has been adding material attributed to he religious website https://pushparpan.com/. Wikipedia has standing policies on what material can be added. The first is WP:RS which states that any material you add has to be attributable to a reliable source. As you will notice if you read that page, self-published webpages such as pushparpan.com do not constitute a reliable source. Another policy that you need to be aware of is WP:BRD. In a nutshell, once I revert your edits, you are obliged to discuss it either here on the article talk page. If you continue to revert without discussion then you will find yourself blocked from editing. Thank you. Mark Marathon (talk) 10:50, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Material attributed to pushparpan.com/ 

message: Collection of tendril Sankhasubhra Datta (talk) 13:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clitoria ternatea 

message: It might be interesting to add the information of which chemical components of the flowers produce the vivid blue color. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 23:07, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Which chemicals make it blue?
Template talk:Death

message: I was the one who edited out Reperfusion if anyone feels it needs to be discussed.  Kind of a no-brainer, though, if you look at the link, I think.  --mordicai. 15:06, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reperfusion

message: Edited out any references to religion except in the context of comparing views of all beliefs, religious and secular. 72.192.216.234 (talk) 16:20, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Keeping the template secular

message: Questioning why this is included with death; there is nothing inherently dead or death-causing about PVS over other, less severe conditions also resulting in a need for tube feeding - eg muscular dystrophies, severe cerebral palsy, advanced Alzheimer's etc. etc. In particular nothing much differentiates it from even only very slightly milder disability caused by brain injury - see minimally conscious state.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beccaviola (talk • contribs) 06:35, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Persistant Vegetative State

message: Surely 'funeral' is about the body, and the death certificate is generally about the body. If the items below body were about the soul for example there could be a good reason for this seperation of topics, but they don't seem to be. 2.97.166.23 (talk) 08:19, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: "Afterlife" is not a section, it's just the first item (in alphabetical order) of things that have to do with the Death of a person that are not directly related to the body. A Funeral is NOT about the body: after all, there are funerals without a body (when it is missing or cremated), and there are dead bodies and even burials without funerals (the burial of paupers; the undiscovered bodies of pioneers, explorers, soldiers, etc. which lay where they died). The second line are customs or beliefs that affect how the body is treated; thus, things that indirectly affect a dead body. I tried to make the distinction by adding the lead word "Other" before the second line. Boneyard90 (talk) 10:38, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Afterlife section 

message: I added Sky burial to the list of ways of disposing of bodies. I don't think this is controversial, but I'm making a note here just in case.Travelpleb (talk) 10:11, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sky burial 

message: Apologies if this is in the wrong template talk, feel free to move it if it is. Can any rules be found anywhere on what constitutes a person's death place in a time of war, eg. in an unclear location in open country or at sea etc? For instance, for deaths at sea, a user, Supaidaman0, is going around adding the ship the person was on as their "death place" (see William Miller (footballer, born 1875) for an example). We don't know that he died while on the ship or while in the water. So what is his death place? To me it's just "Aegean Sea". Beatpoet (talk) 14:00, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death places
Talk:Whitefield Academy (Kentucky)

message: whitefield is not catholic. it says "under Highview Baptist Church." Note the Baptist part?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by OJ Buyer (talk • contribs) 21:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: parochial school

message: I'm not too hip on Wikitext and coding. For some reason "" in EL took it to the Westboro site. I replaced it with the actual site.
Those who hate this school might want to create an article here.   (Wikipedia:Alternative outlets)DMBFFF (talk) 10:39, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: January 2020
Talk:Oil body

message: Yes, but what does it DO?68.101.123.219 (talk) 22:43, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: This article may provide some useful information for disentangling information about liverwort oil bodies from seed plant oil bodies, which seem to be two quite different things. Here is a quote from the article:
:Liverwort oil bodies are intracytoplasmic secretory structures bound by single membranes that originate from the dilatation of endoplasmic reticulum cisternae (Suire, 1970; Duckett and Ligrone, 1995). They have no subcellular equivalent in spermaphytes and are unlike plant seed oil bodies that accumulate mostly acyl lipids surrounded by a monolayer of phospholipids containing basic proteins, oleosins (Tzen and Huang, 1992).
This makes it sound like the reference to oleosin in oil bodies belongs to the seed plant sense, not the liverwort sense. Since it was also added in the edit that added seed plants to the discussion, I'm going to remove it; also removing a reference that went with the seed plant discussion but didn't get removed when I removed the other seed plant material.
This article gives a brief historical discussion of the literature on oil bodies and other oil-storage structures in seed plants, and the different terminology that has been used for them (oil bodies, elaioplasts, oleosomes, spherosomes, oil droplets; it sounds like even in the scientific literature there is some terminological confusion.
Steorra (talk) 20:39, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I've attempted a rewrite to include information about both kinds of oil bodies and distinguish between them. I'm not particularly knowledgeable about biology and may well have made some mistakes but I'm pretty sure my disentangled version is an improvement over what was there before. Steorra (talk) 21:40, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disentangling info about liverwort oil bodies and seed plant oil bodies
Talk:Madden NFL 2003

message: This was Randall Cunningham and Ryan Leaf's final Madden appearance, right? Kendall Simmons was the only first-rounder to go by the position-uniform number format instead of his real name. I noticed all this in the PC version of this game. Please add this to the Trivia section. 72.14.252.136 15:19, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw on Bruce Matthews' page that he was included as well.  WAVY 10 19:15, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Spokes Mashiyane

message: I've not read anywhere that says that Spokes is so called because he fashioned his first whistles from bicycle spokes and it's hard to see how this would be possible. I've heard that Spokes is a Tsotsitaal nickname for someone that uses a sharpened spoke as a lethal weapon, like the character Butcher did in the film Tsotsi. Mbaqanga 15:22, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Either way this is a sadly meager article I think I'll add to my own to-do list.--T. Anthony (talk) 12:53, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [untitled]