lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Adam (Torchwood)

message: The continuity section mentions that Adam came from the void; which is where the Eternals lived.  Would it be safe to assume that these are the same as The Eternals in Doctor Who? Howie ☎ 01:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not.  In the show he doesn't say that that's where he orginated from but rather that he was trapped there. DonQuixote (talk) 04:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Eternals? 

message: He seems to be part of this season's 'story arc'.  Captain John Hart claims to have found him, but the man is a liar.  It seems odd he never mentioned this before, when he was trying to be accepted as a friend.  More secrets to be revealed, I supposed.--GwydionM (talk) 12:57, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Jack's brother's name is actually "Gray". 83.104.249.240 (talk) 21:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grey 

message: Is it worth mentioning the similarity in underlying plot between this episode and the Torchwood book Border Princes (ie the inclusion of an alien team member and the rewriting of everyone's memories so that he seems to have always been there)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.219.220.116 (talk) 14:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I certainly find it interesting. The story also resemples the Buffy episode "Superstar", aired in 2000, in which reality was also changed (including opening credits) to include another person in the team, by that person. They were all written by different people though (Jane Espenson, Dan Abnett and Catherine Tregenna). 128.176.150.225 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 05:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Border Princes? 

message: This section includes a mention of Jack and Ianto's kiss. But there was no kiss in this episode, IIRC - the kiss was in a previous episode, "To the Last Man." Lvsxy808 (talk) 10:59, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Production" section
Talk:Reset (Torchwood)

message: Can someone with access to a paper TV guide confirm that this episode is aired on BBC 3 right after "Meat" "Adam" on BBC 2?  — Edokter • Talk •  01:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Times, The Daily Telegraph and The Daily Mail all list a documentry about kids who self ham. The BBC lists Reset as occuring NEXT week after "Adam", as does Torchwood This Week. Which... this article does as well, so I don't understand the need for the question.  --OZOO 13:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My bad... So it is in fact a split-channel double bill?  — Edokter • Talk •  16:07, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Reset" aired on BBC3 (9:50) directly after "Adam" on BBC2 (9:00) - 194.72.70.113 (talk) 23:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Essentially from now on BBC2 will be airing a repeat of the episode that played on BBC3 and BBCHD the previous week in a schedule similar to E4's "first look. Benv-b92(talk) 00:47, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airing date 

message: :-"Who's been kicked out of the Doctor Who house?"
:-"It's Martha!"
Sorry I couldn't help it. --TS 21:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Door rolls open

message: After Owen saves Martha's life by destroying the mayfly in her abdomen with the alien scalpel she tells him she has a boyfriend who has saved her life. Interesting. Surely she's referring to the Doctor, despite earlier trying to convince Jack that she was over him. 83.104.249.240 (talk) 15:50, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It remains speculation who she's talkning about.  — Edokter • Talk •  15:53, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Freema said in an interview that the Doctor isn't the boyfriend.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.96.86.235 (talk) 02:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

text: It could be misdirection as well.  Too often we assume the good guys are unimpeachable and never dishonest.  It could have simply been a "little white lie" to dodge Owen's charms.  Besides, Martha isn't Rose; she and the Doctor were never an item.  It was clear to both her and Donna that he was still hung up on Rose, anyway. NathanJ1979 (talk) 09:19, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Martha's "boyfriend"?
Talk:Manfred Clynes

message: This article, posing as a biography, is actually an autobiography (in its entirety or in very large part), as internal evidence confirms. It lacks neutrality. It lacks balance, for conflicting views are not included. As autobiographies are deprecated on Wikipedia, I imagine that it should be removed.
--Fred Q (talk) 13:29, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Autobiography?
Talk:Yvonne Lim

message: Pls note that the awards section is only for the list of AWARDS and NOT nominations as the heading wrote AWARDS only. Thus, ALL nomination records of this actress have been DELETED from this page. Only award records of this actress is kept in this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.15.158.51 (talk) 15:31, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards section 

message: A segment I wrote when starting on this article of Yvonne Lim has been deleted, the one about her nicknamed "Champagne", etc. It is named "trivia" and I see no reason for it to be deleted. (it is just some background info abt the actress) It may not comply with wikipedia's writing standards, but i believe it should be improved on, instead of the article completely disappearing off the face of this page...moderator, pls take attention ~HKS  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.21.154.71 (talk) 14:21, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of page "Trivia" 

message: There is a current RFC on certain content in Singapore artistes BLP articles that editors watching/editing/passing through this article may be interested in weighing in: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs. This article may be affected due to the inclusion of :Category:Singaporean actors‎ and/or one of its subcategories in the article. RobertskySemi (talk) 00:05, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC on content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs
Talk:Arc Holdings

message: It appears to me that by WP standards, the company name--and the article title--should be spelled Arc International, rather than ARC International. In general, WP avoids unnecessary capitalizations, and the company's own documents use "Arc International" sometimes, including their July 2007 Corporate press file, and the president's message on their French and English websites. The fact that they usually use all caps might mean that the all-caps spelling is merely a marketing style rather than an essential part of the name. This does not override WP's style guidelines (e.g., MOS:TM). I see this as being in substantial contrast to the name of the ARC International microprocessor company, for which "ARC" originated as an acronym. Changing this article to "Arc" would further help to distinguish the two company--and article--names. --Rich Janis (talk) 07:33, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds fine to me.  Can a better qualifier than (household) if it's going to be moved?  Perhaps (glass manufacturer)?  Though it does make a variety of goods, glass seems to be its main product.  WLU (talk) 11:06, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Their webwsite header & Corporate press file both promote them as "world leader in tableware". How about "Arc International (tableware)"? OTOH, I've never created or changed the name of an article, so I wonder: Would the change to "Arc International" mean that it would no longer need anything in parentheses to distinguish it from the microprocessor company? --Rich Janis (talk) 20:15, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The relevant page is WP:MOVE if you're looking for it - pretty easy to do and good experience.  Arc international, ARC international, ARC international and Arc International are all redlinks, but if typed in they all link to the same page thanks to recent software updates (I think, it used to be case specific).  Be sure to fix the redirects too!  Tableware is OK, maybe a bit clunky, if you're looking for more guidance, check out WP:NAME.  WLU (talk) 00:51, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks; your suggestions were very helpful, and the effort was instructive. Based on WP:NAME's advice about minimum ambiguity, I kept parens. The "What links here" list didn't show any redirects before the move. I changed the links to this article in ARC International, Luminarc, Toughened glass, & Template:List of glass companies. --Rich Janis (talk) 09:12, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ARC or Arc? 

message: Currently, the article about the Luminarc brand has more info about the Arc International company than this article does. Also, since this article is so new, some other articles (e.g., Lead crystal) that mention Arc International link it to the Luminarc article instead of this one. Someone familiar w/ this topic might want to work on reversing this situation. --Rich Janis (talk) 09:36, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, a merge might be in order.  I'll add the tags.  WLU (talk) 13:37, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luminarc 

message: To add to article: a photo showing an Arcoroc glass. 173.88.243.210 (talk) 20:36, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article
Talk:Karl Filiga

message: Filiga has not played NRL at any level yet, and certainly not with the Bulldogs, therefore the team does not belong in the infobox.
He is also listed as a centre on the Sharks site - again, not that he has played anything so far at NRL level. See Template:Infobox rugby league biography for information on completing infoboxes. It was recently drawn to my attention that I was completing them incorrrectly as far as wikilinking - clubs shouldn't be linked from within the infobox - in fact, very little should be, especially if it is linked in the article body. Your assistance would be appreciated. •Florrie•leave a note• 15:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bulldogs
Talk:List of British architects

message: This is a list of notable British architects but there are a large number of redlinked names which provide no evidence of notability. WP:LSC gives a fairly clear guide to who should, and who should not be included in a 'List' article.
I've started to look at the list of recent/living architects and architectural practices, adding sources to the redlinked names if I can find them. There are a number of them I have been unable to find clear evidence that they are notable (as defined by Wikipedia). Most of them could possibly be notable so I've left them in the list to give someone else the opportunity to provide evidence. There were a few whose notability is in serious doubt and I have deleted them.
The same rule of thumb should apply to the long-dead redlinked architects too. Sionk (talk) 15:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: I'm looking at some material regarding Derick and intend to create a page for him in the near future. 
He's currently in the Architects who emigrated section. I think it would be a better reflection of his career if he were moved to the Victorian section as he spent almost all of his career in Britain and Ireland, with a short spell in India. He moved to USA in 1858 and died there in 1859 and had few commissions before his death.
Yes, he is was an architect who emigrated, but his primary work was as a British/Irish architect. Probably he ought to be in both sections, but if we have to choose I think he ought to be in the Victorian.
Has anyone any thoughts on this? MEDChambers (talk) 04:23, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Macduff Derick - propose he is moved to the Victorian architects section
Talk:Lane's End Farm

message: While I was researching AP Indy, I came across an article that might help here: http://www.equibase.com/breederscup/2015/bios/LanesEndRacing.pdf Lots of good stuff! Feel free to add others: I hope to get around to this some day! Jlvsclrk (talk) 05:16, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Confraternity of Catholic Saints

message: This article seemed to be a personal website. It even states its officials. Not an "encyclopedic" type of article.
WP:NOTMYSPACE
Tnavarro61 (talk) 11:54, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

message: In accordance with the deletion discussion and its result and the presence of an "advertisement" tag, I have heavily edited the article, removing the sections unrelated to CCS (John Paul II has his own article, and other saints and blessed people have, or should if they are notable) and trimming those about the organization and structure of the Confraternity. Goochelaar (talk) 11:25, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edited version
Talk:Carmell Jones

message: I have reverted the article to its September 15, 2009 version.  In February and March 2010, two editors with personal connections to the subject added large amounts of text without any attribution.  I have reverted these edits.  I'm sorry to have to remove so much text, but it was PoV, unverified and, I think, represented a conflict of interest.  WP:SELFCITING is particularly relevant in this case. Thank you, -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 02:12, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lochlann

message: I've removed the bulk of the reference to 'Llychlyn' and the Medieval Wales category. The word has no mythological overtones in Middle Welsh: it means simply 'Scaninavia' (albeit often rather vaguely). The following assertion — "The land of Llychlyn is mentioned in the Middle Welsh prose tale The Dream of Rhonabwy where it is located beneath lakes or the sea" — is just not correct. Llychlyn is mentioned twice (just checked) in the text but it is clear that it refers to Scandinavia or the Norse lands in general: no reference to it being "located beneath lakes or the sea" whatsoever! I suggest that as the article deals almost entirely with Lochlann in Irish/Gaelic lore it is best kept that way, even though Llychlyn and Lochlann are cognate. 19:48, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good move. In any case, recent research (cf. Rachel Bromwich's work in particular) suggests that Llychlyn in The Dream of Rhonabwy is an error for Llydaw, the Welsh name for Brittany, or possibly a reference to Llydaw in Gwynedd. There are a lot of references to Llychlyn as an 'otherworld' on the web, I think the Dictionary of Celtic Mythology's erroneous entry is primarily to blame. I've never seen it used in such a way in the medieval Welsh sources. ANB (talk) 19:40, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Llychlyn 

message: Hard to be sure after such a long passage of time, but I think Nyland appeared as neither Murray nor H-Smith (on p. 51) mentioned "Lochlann". As a source for a legend (as opposed to a theory of linguistics) it didn't seem incredible at the time. However, fortunately  H-Smith does refer to the Lochlann connection on p. 61, so that's fixed. Nyland would seem to be "brilliantly mad" as you suspect. Ben MacDui 08:41, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nyland
Talk:Tina Marsh

message: The tone of this article does need some work.  I'll go on record here as asserting that the subject is, indeed, notable.  I have a copy of Cadence Magazine with a Tina Marsh interview.  Someday when I have time, I'll go through it and see about citing it as a source in this article. Thanks, -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 19:50, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the text was largely copied from the CO2 website, which would explain the CoI and non-neutral tone.  I've removed the text in question and left a very short (but referenced) stub in its place.  The maintenance issues no longer apply so I have removed the tags.  I do have an issue of Cadence with a Marsh interview that I hope, sometime soon, to use for more information. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 01:37, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've made an attempt, at least we're back up to a few sentences (with references).  I had planned to add a link to Marsh/CO2's AMG page (if one exists) but currently I can't access that site. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 23:23, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mortgage yield

message: As mentioned on the yield curve spread discussion page, there are several pages on very closely related concepts. It may be helpful to rethink how all these pages relate to one another. This page on mortgage yield could be an interesting step in that direction. Finnancier (talk) 15:41, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Although the topics are closely related they are entities by themselves and can be discussed independently. At least mortgage yield can be. To merge them would not be entirely correct. A better idea would be to elucidate the relation between them on both their pages. What say? Nshuks7 (talk) 13:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Yield spread, yield curve spread, mortgage yield, etc
Talk:Charlie Persip

message: The proposal to delete this article mystifies me. Must be a mistake. Just read the article. While it is not (yet) as fully developed as it could be, clearly the subject is notable. He has articles on his accomplishments, cited here, in AllMusic and All About Jazz. Just look at the discography posted here alone: over 140 albums! Therefore, I am going to delete the templates. --Alan W (talk) 00:49, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion?
Talk:Herb Robertson

message: Why was the biography that I wrote on Herb Robertson taken down? It has been up for a year or so and is very accurate. I even asked Herb questions to make sure it would be accurate. Now there is nothing up there of any value to anyone. Please tell me what to do to bring it back.
Scott Yanow  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.235.161.117 (talk) 00:11, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alvin Stoller

message: my grandfather alvin stoller, my dad clay david stoller, my mom lisa marie stoller, me aaron job stoller.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.42.84 (talk) 01:42, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  my family tree 

message: Not sure how the anonymous user who added Alvin Stoller's death date found it. Assuming good faith, I hesitate to remove it. Maybe someone can confirm this, preferably with some publicly available source. --Alan W (talk) 01:33, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death Date
Talk:U.S. Army Heritage and Education Center

message: This could be a class=B article, if an editor could add at least three secondary source inline citations. --DThomsen8 (talk) 16:21, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More footnotes 

message: As a program assistant at the U.S. Army Heritage and Education Center facility, I will be keeping the factual data of this page up-to-date to facilitate the ease of information-gathering (trip-planning, etc) for visitors and patrons of the facility.
Karl.warner (talk) 19:16, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keeping the USAHEC page up-to-date 
Template talk:Space stations

message: I'd like to suggest that the image in the template is changed to that of Mir - whilst the ISS is the current station in orbit, we have images of the complete Mir station, whereas the ISS changes on a fairly regular basis, and so far is not complete. Colds7ream (talk) 16:17, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes sense, but to me it is more important to use a representative of current events, rather than one that was deorbited many years ago, even if it is shown complete. I would suggest to wait a week, and if no one else voices a concern, go ahead and re-add the image. Thanks for your explanation! — Huntster (talk • email • contribs) 17:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Station image in template

message: Hi. Something bugged me abbout this template and then I realized it was the mix of national-international and private projects that leads to the Developmental group's subgrouping. Any thoughts about a layout like the below?
Sardanaphalus (talk) 14:49, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In theory I like it, though there is way too much whitespace and just a bit too monochromatic altogether.  If you don't mind, I'd like to play around with your proposal a bit when I have a moment. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 08:37, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

text: *Thanks, I'd appreciate that. It's my thinking about the template too. Sardanaphalus (talk) 10:09, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative layout 

message: why are all the Salyut stations listed as `Salyut', while Genesis, is Genesis 1, and II??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.217.100.185 (talk • contribs) 02:34, 31 May 2008
:Because the Salyut program has its own topic page which covers the entire program, providing links to each one.  There are only two Genesis craft, so no real point in having a "program" page for them.  Salyut, by benefit of being the larger program, can accomplish things more efficiently. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 07:41, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency 

message: Can we removed Galactic Suite from this template since, seriously, it's vaporware? --Apoc2400 (talk) 19:53, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: While I agree regardings its viability, I'm still seeing bits in the news about it. It needs to stay until there is no possibility they are actually making whatever they intend to make; otherwise we're pushing POV. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 21:10, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  There is absolutely no reason at all to include Galactic Suites in this template.  Until there is something to give notability to this space station, there is no reason to include it here.  I can't even find any evidence that this is even a station that is under development in the first place or that any sort of "bent metal" has happened.  That there may be somebody pushing a dream perhaps, but they certainly don't even fit the criteria for a space station "under development"  --Robert Horning (talk) 13:54, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Galactic Suite 

message: Where does this fit in? The proposed section? (Pindanl (talk) 10:58, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Sun gun]]
Talk:Anthosactis pearseae

message: If anyone here knows the family, please add it to the taxobox. Thank you. Grundle2600 (talk) 16:36, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I don't know the family

message: In 2012 Anthosactis pearseae was renamed Ostiactis pearseae and moved to the Ostiactinidae family of the superfamily Metridioidea.Mario1952 (talk) 13:26, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ostiactis pearseae
Template talk:Euro accession map

message: The map is wrong, Lithuania has joined the eurozone. The original svg file seems fine but the template has it wrong. Can someone fix it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.216.218.9 (talk) 09:55, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just your cache.  Next time try WP:BYPASS.  TDL (talk) 18:49, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The map is wrong
Talk:Michael Utley

message: in the 80's, I met his wife. She offered me a job to go on tour in her place with Rita C to Austria. She was a great Lighting Designer operator. I just wonder what happened to her. Of course,I can no longer find her number. Anyone know if they are still married? Is she still working? 2600:1700:FCEC:EC00:953:EBB8:D6C5:2E50 (talk) 17:29, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  looking for info on his wife
Talk:Resistance: 2

message: I think we should merge this article into Resistance: Fall of Man because the game hasn't even been officially announced yet, so it just seems a bit pointless to me to keep the article. When the game has officially been announced the article can be recreated with more information, and just really a better article. See WP:NOT. It's not a crystal ball. We should merge the article until we've got more information.--EclipseSSD (talk) 16:46, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirected. Similar titles also redirect there, so that seems sensible. As the article was all rumor, there didn't seem to be anything to merge. Pagrashtak 18:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal