Talk:2005 Atlantic hurricane season/Archive 19

message: If Zeta remains in activity as far of January 1st or 2nd of 2006,  could the storm still be named as Zeta (2005) or the storm will became   Alberto, the 1st official storm of 2006? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.42.232.131 (talk • contribs) .
:It stays Zeta. That's also what happened with Hurricane Alice in 1954-55. CrazyC83 00:40, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, they did steal the name Alice from 1955, but I agree that the name is maintained. - Cuivienen 03:37, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's because there weren't any satellites back then and Alice was caught on January 1 but was later proven to have developed on December 30. CrazyC83 03:44, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry to barge in, but don't wiki to know how to start a new topic. Is there a way to get to read the Tropical Storm Zeta Advisory Archive? The National Hurricane Center's link isn't working. 66.47.77.94 13:21, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Welcome to Wikipedia, 66.47.77.94!  You're right that the NHC's link for Zeta is not working.  Try here: .  However, you won't be able to see any advisories between 5 pm AST last night and today as their archive doesn't seem to be updating (it's supposed to be automated).  Update: The link actually is working now, but you still can't see any new advisories.  -- Super-Magician (talk • contribs • count) ★ 16:25, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Why would they rename it? That would be too confusing. The present naming system may be stupid, but I'd doubt they'd be that anal about it. :-P Good kitty 14:47, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The article says that the Hurricane season is June-November.  Does this mean that naming won't start again until June, or will any possible January tropical storm be named Alberto?  Perhaps someone who knows could update the article to include what the 12-month period is for the naming of storms.  --65.91.102.204 17:04, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, even if the storm forms during the offseason it will be named after the naming list. so, if a new tropical cyclone forms in January it'll be called Alberto and if one forms in December it will be named after the next name on the list--WmE 18:03, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

text: The name obviously stayed the same.  However, it should be mentioned that if a storm were to pass from the Atlantic to the Pacific, its name would change from the Atlantic basin name to the Pacific basin name.  I'm having trouble finding an instance where this actually happened. myselfalso 05:03, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hurricane Hattie, Hurricane Cesar, Hurricane Joan. Jdorje 05:16, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  As early as 2006, it would be 'Zeta' or 'Alberto'?  

message: If Zeta survives the shear, as one model predicts, and lives to become a hurricane, then it is possible that we can have the #1 ACE season.  Then it would be significant to restore ACE charts and ACE values.  I know this has been discussed ad nauseum but with it approaching the 243 mark (it's currently at 240), it is now a possibility that we have the #1 year.  I know the storm counts as a 2005 storm, but does the 2006 info for Zeta apply to its ACE number? And the season ended 4 minutes ago...right?! Hopquick 00:04, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It counts to 2005, just like Alice2. --24.83.100.214 01:10, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, that's what I thought.  Wow.  That ACE number is getting so big. :)  Hopquick 01:19, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The last and final topic about ACE restoration

message: Help!  Someone (or someones) has mangled the footnotes!  There are 's without 's and vice-versa all over the place.  I have fixed one and commented out two cases where someone thought the parameter the a  was the URL being referenced!  However, I cannot put more time into this tonight.  --EMS | Talk 04:03, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I had noted this above... We should eventually change it to the new method involving <ref> and <reference>, but perhaps wait until Zeta gets out of the way and the editing rate dies down. --AySz88^-^ 04:11, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Since it is completely messed up now, let's just go ahead and change them to <ref> and <reference> now. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 05:45, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footnotes are messed up! 

message: I was tired of seeing Jose and Lee lonely without an image while all the others do, so I have added images for them.
If anyone objects or could do better than me, let me know. Wikipikarefulgenschu 00:35, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jose and Lee's missing images 

message: The NHC report for Tropical Storm Alpha is out. 200.119.236.216 00:21, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Only real change was the intensity was adjusted downwards from 50 to 45 knots (60 to 50 mph). CrazyC83 01:49, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Another report is out: for the least notable system of 2005, Tropical Depression Nineteen. CrazyC83 16:15, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alpha