lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Baby shower

message: It seems the first part of the article refers to the tradition in one country, and then there is an 'other countries' section for elsewhere. It is never stated which country the beginning refers to. --81.109.145.143 (talk) 10:20, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree that the article should be neutral. Baby showers are quite US-centric. Other pre-, peri- and post-natal celebrations should be recognized, but this doesn't seem to be the location, since baby showers are separate and seem notable enough themselves to have an article. The lead does seem confused about whether the article is country-agnostic, but the rest of the article (even prior to my edits?) seemed quite US-centric, with links to other practices and stray information about international alternatives. I think it should be updated to explain how baby showers are quite American (assuming we have a citation for that and I'm not mistaken, since I'm from the UK)? Throne3d (talk) 05:10, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is generally US-centric. 86.139.218.163 (talk) 11:35, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Countries? 

message: A US idea exported by US TV (which must be some of the worst that I've seen in the world) to the hard-of-thinking in other countries as a culture substitute.  Fortunately, it is relegated by the more intelligent people in those countries to the 'US over-consumption' bin.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.104.126 (talk • contribs) 07:47, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  US idea 

message: The addition of the "Ancient traditions" is so puzzling to me. Some of these are completely unrelated to the topic. It feels like it was added to add some petty credibility to this modern tradition. Antari.koko (talk) 07:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  In fact all of the "Ancient traditions" are unrelated to the US event.  As long as sell-whenever-you-can remains the US way it will have trouble being great, let alone great again.  The saying outside the US is that US-ians know the price of everything and the value of nothing. 86.139.218.163 (talk) 11:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ancient" section is unrelated bloat.
Talk:Snus

message: The section about creative use feels really out of place, just like vodka tampons would, if we had added a "Creative use" section on the Vodka article. In my mind it conflicts with several notability requirements, like WP:NOTTEMPORARY, WP:SUSTAINED etc. 
Most importantly of all, it just feels stupid, and cheapens the article quality to include the latest teenager scandal of some Danish tabloids. KristofferR (talk) 02:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove "Creative use" section? 

message: Parts of this section, which has a warning label, are muddled and have little to do with the subject of the article. I've tried editing it. Material cut appears below. Chrismorey (talk) 17:00, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Health risks 

message: "Snus users had lower systolic blood pressure than tobacco nonusers in the unadjusted data." Do we really want this in an encyclopedia? If it is unajusted, it does not mean much. In general, I feel the article should rely more on reviews and healthcare recommendations than single studies, per WP:SECONDARY. Ffaffff (talk) 19:51, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I will remove that bit then. Ffaffff (talk) 00:02, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Studies on snus 

message: Upperdecky is common name 2600:1017:B01F:1063:C571:CF2:893B:4556 (talk) 19:17, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upperdecky
Talk:The Nose (opera)

message: As an opera fan and a Shostakovich fan I gotta say, great that you guys started this.  Unfortunately I have a gripe: probably the The Nose article should be the short story, which I am fairly certain is better known than the opera.  How would you guys feel about moving this to The Nose (opera)?  --Chinasaur 07:47, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally all I know of the story is from the opera, but then these things are very subjective.  Are you planning to write an article on the story?  We don't have many articles on individual stories, as opposed to books, so unless someone has a specific plan I doubt that one will materialise. Markalexander100 09:36, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)

text: That seems reasonable. Markalexander100 02:51, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed a note about Freudian imagery in the plot since Gogol's story was written 20 years before Freud was born.  I have to agree that many Gogol stories (Pushkin too) have elements that seem very Freudian.  But I don't think we should call it that; more likely the detailed psychological characterizations of these authors influenced Freud (anybody looked into this?).  If the opera has somehow additionally Freudianized the original story that might be worth mentioning, but from what I can tell the plot is pretty closely derived from Gogol.
:I finally read the story last night to check up on Freud, and the plot is very close, but I've separated the pages to show the differences (mainly in structure).   Markalexander100 02:48, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freudian "influence" 

message: The article states that the 1975 Gennady Rozhdestvensky recording was released on Melodiya without libretto. In fact it was released on 2 LPs by EMI Melodiya as SLS 5088 with transliterated Russian text and English translation. It was the 2007 Melodiya rerelease on CD, coupled with The Gamblers, that had neither text nor translation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.173.183.83 (talk) 07:04, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  1975 Recording under Rozhdestvensky 

message: Posted info re: Met Revival 2013 and HD Simulcast. I don't mean it as advertising, but it is an unusual opera that most people won't otherwise have a chance to see. 77.97.23.235 (talk) 22:33, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This is reasonable under WP Opera guidelines - and you've even referenced it.Viva-Verdi (talk) 23:54, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Met Revival 
Talk:Venlo

message: Not to forget: Venlo is where people from the Rhine-Ruhr area come to enjoy a good smoke. 84.44.169.198 22:11, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "going to Venlo" is a synonym for "getting dope" 

message: or ? – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:29, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  IPA
Talk:Wharram Percy

message: Removed possible copyright violation:
The Black Death of 1348-9 ...  room for extra sheep pasturage.
This is the same as the text at Lost Village Sites of Yorkshire: Wharram Percy
If you used the text by permission, please indicate so. Thanks. --138.37.188.109 10:33, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Ooops, well done and sorry. Overzealous of me. 138.37.188.109 11:02, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 

message: Does the DMV site designation include neighboring sites like Raisthorpe? -FZ 20:15, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 1 

message: How many houses were there? What was the maximum population? Is there a museum showing findings? - 178.0.203.83 (talk) 12:44, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 2
Talk:Portuguese language/Archive 2

message: Maybe its time to split these page, its above 40 kbs. I suggest a series of articles. What do you say (Pedro??) MvHG 15:06, 17 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article split 

message: "cerrar" is correct portuguese. look up in your dictionary. Haven't you ever heard anything like "os jogadores tentam cerrar mais a barreira"? granted, encerrar is more commun, but cerrar is closer to the given spanish word, that's why I thought it was more appropriate. --Cataphract 23:05, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Other

message: 'Also, many words of Portuguese origin entered the lexicons of many other languages such as "arigatô" to mean "thank you" in Japanese (from "obrigado")'
I believe it has been proven that arigato gozaimasu (thank you) was in use in Japan long before contact with the Portuguese.  However, Japanese does have words of Portuguese origin ... I do not know Portuguese so I cannot verify the accuracy of the original words.  In Japanese they are: kappa (raincoat), karuta (playing cards), tabako (cigarettes/tobacco), pan (bread), and botan (button) to name a few. CES 00:22, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: that is not what I came to know in a Investigation in Japan some years ago, that clearly stated that the japanese did not had a word for "thank you", so they used the Portuguese. Different cultures does not allways have a word for a given concept. We are talking about a contact made since 1543 and Portugal made great influence in the country, visible even today in a village in South Japan. There is also Bidoro (from Vidro - glass), saya (from saia - skirt) and some more.
for information:
*Japanese - Portuguese 
*kappa - Capa
*karuta - Cartas
*tabako - tabaco
*pan - pão
*botan - botão
"ão" in portuguese is a nazalized sound, should not be read as "ao" but as "ang". If not... the word is very similar to the Portuguese, a coincidence? What I know it came via Portuguese, if you say it aint then you may have info on that. --Pedro 02:02, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arigato 

message: Many SAMPA sounds that was in the article since yesterday were wrong (especially vowels). I'll also include IPA (using its images, that are prettier and everyone supports). I used IPA in preference to SAMPA. What do you think? .-Pedro 11:24, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  SAMPA/IPA
Talk:Book of Days

message: I usually make the mistake of thinking that a Book of Hours is actually called a book of days. However, I suspect the term could also be used to refer modern books of aniversaries or on this day type lists, in which case feel free to replace this redirect with an article. -- Solipsist 11:24, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)

message: I have not read the dab page rules in a while, but I think the general convention is it is for navigation purposes, not to list every possible usage .. so if there is no article for it, it may not be appropriate for a dab page. -- Stbalbach 03:16, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  dab page criteria
Talk:Peak oil

message: As of 2024, it has been recognized that conventional oil production has peaked around 2006.    
Is it for the world or the US? Because it smells a little US defaultism here.           Kristo Mefisto (talk) 12:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It's world. TheFella03 (talk) 21:07, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  We should distinguish US oil production and world oil production
Talk:Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus

message: I know I'm supposed to fix the double redirects that I created by moving this article, but I have deliberately refrained from doing so in case a debate springs up over the choice of "sensitive" or "susceptible".  The three existing references on Wikipedia use the former option, while all the examples I can find on the Web use the latter.  If nobody notices this within, say, the next week, I shall delete the "sensitive" version and remove the double redirects. -- Heron 13:05, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sensitive or susceptible?
Talk:Commodore 128

message: It is said that Previous Commodores had only two cursor keys, which required using the shift key to move the cursor up or left.. This not true, as the computers of the 264-series (C16, Plus/4, and C116) had four cursor keys. Only VIC20 and C64 had 2 cursor keys.Leo72 (talk) 20:51, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cursor keys 

message: The phrase "previous commodores had only two cursor keys" was not correct, because it let mean that C16 & +4 had 2 cursor keys too but they instead had single cursor keys (for a number of 4). Fiexd.
Leo72 (talk) 09:39, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cursor keys
Talk:Peter Robinson

message: :Is Peter Robinson the real leader of the DUP? Is the DUP for or against power-sharing? (217.41.240.18 13:42, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Both of those questions are matters for some debate just at the moment, are they not?  ;-)  Gerry Lynch 14:17, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politician 

message: Partial list of articles with a formerly-incorrectly-linked Peter Robinson that I could not correctly link.  Please remove them as they are properly linked.
# 23:00, 17 April 2008 (hist) (diff) Everything You Desire‎ (dewikilink Peter Robinson. It's not clear which if any of the people at Peter Robinson (disambiguation) this belongs to) (top)
# 22:58, 17 April 2008 (hist) (diff) m Lola Ray‎ (dewikilink Peter Robinson, not sure which if any person at Peter Robinson (disambiguation) is this person) (top)
# 22:55, 17 April 2008 (hist) (diff) m Tom Griscom‎ (dewikilink Peter Robinson) (top)
# 22:51, 17 April 2008 (hist) (diff) m Silk and Steel (Five Star album)‎ (dewikilink Peter Robinson, not clear which if any person at Peter Robinson (disambiguation) is this guy) (top)
# 22:49, 17 April 2008 (hist) (diff) m If You Love Me, Let Me Know‎ (dewikilink Peter Robinson, unclear which if any persons listed at Peter Robinson (disambiguation) is him. Probably the founder of The Strangers but not 100% sure.) (top)
# 22:38, 17 April 2008 (hist) (diff) m Behind the Sun (Eric Clapton album)‎ (Disambig Peter Robinson to a redlink Peter Robinson (musician) as there are at least two other articles that talk about him) (top)
# 22:33, 17 April 2008 (hist) (diff) m Dorothy Perkins‎ (→History: dewikilink Peter Robinson, it's unclear which if any of the people in Peter Robinson (disambiguation) is him. It looks like none.) (top)
# 22:32, 17 April 2008 (hist) (diff) m Long Live Love‎ (→Track listing: dewikilink Peter Robinson, no such article, if you create one add it to Peter Robinson (disambiguation) and check other non-wikilinked occurrances of Peter Robinson) (top)
# 22:30, 17 April 2008 (hist) (diff) m Isaac Roberts‎ (→Life: dewikilink Peter Robinson, no such person, if you create an article please add it to Peter Robinson (disambiguation)) (top)
# 22:28, 17 April 2008 (hist) (diff) m Heysel Stadium Disaster‎ (→May 29, 1985: dewikilink Peter Robinson, no such article, if you create one, add it to Peter Robinson (disambiguation)) (top)
# 22:27, 17 April 2008 (hist) (diff) m You Can't Hurry Love‎ (→Phil Collins version: dewikilink Peter Robinson - no known article about him. If you make one, add it to Peter Robinson (disambiguation)) (top)
davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 23:09, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Recently dewikilinked instances of Peter Robinson April 2008
Talk:Low church

message: I have merged the article Low Churchman into this one.  aliceinlampyland 15:28, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: The article could maybe find room for discussion about Low Church theological currents within non-Evangelical and non-Anglican Christianity. Since the Second Vatican Council and the constitution Dei Verbum, the Church has made a good deal of room for the study of the Scriptures, to the point where many Churchmen could at least in theory be called Low Churchmen. There is a good amount of information already in the article Evangelical Catholic. Similar comparisons could also be made with the Eastern Orthodox. While in practice these liturgical Churches are known for their high degree of ritualism, the High Church sensibility is not always required among all the clergy and laity. ADM (talk) 17:25, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Low Church and Roman Catholic Church

message: "More traditional low church Anglicans, under the influence of Calvinist or Reformed thought inherited from the Reformation era, reject the doctrine that the sacraments confer grace ex opere operato (e.g. baptismal regeneration) and lay stress on the Bible as the ultimate source of authority in matters of faith necessary for salvation. "
Is this correct ?   "Down-playing" or "de-emphasising" particular aspects of the doctrine is not the same as "rejecting".Eregli bob (talk) 11:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious assertion
Talk:Time–frequency representation

message: Whoever created this page did a nice job.  Solid information and well written. jeffo 14:50, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I wrote this page. Thanks. I put a lot of time and effort into writing a thorough introduction to the subject in [http:// www.ffconsultancy.com/free/thesis.pdf my PhD thesis]. I also contributed significantly to research in this area (see the Hilbert-Hermitian wavelet) and commercialized my work in the form of [http:// www.ffconsultancy.com/products/CWT/ a Mathematica add-on]. If you want to do time-frequency analysis accurately, the maths gets very hard very quickly. So I'm not sure it belongs on Wikipedia. Maybe a cutdown version based on Gabor/Morlet would be ok. Jon Harrop 13:31, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

message: If I am not mistaken, the set \mathcal{C} in the paragraph named Quadratic forms is always convex as it is always empty.  I do not the correct version of this statement, I am guessing that it should read something like If for every T \in [0, E_0] the set \{ (t, f) \in \mathbb{R}^2 : |E(t, f)| > T \} is convex, then the QTFR E(t, f) is cross-term free.
46.142.36.29 (talk) 22:48, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Empty Set
Talk:Medium-chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency

message: The present page is:
:written from the perspective of a paediatric pathologist, largely intended for parents and other family members who have experience of Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy. I hope the biochemistry will be checked and refined by biochemists
I know absolutely nothing about this, but I've moved it from MCAD, which now redirects here, as I don't believe pages should be titled by acronyms (with AIDS as one possible exception). JFW | T@lk 14:49, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved from the original page

message: I know a baby with MCADD.  She was diagnosed via a routine blood test shortly after she was born.  That possibility isn't mentioned in this article, and that's the only change I can think of.  Any time she's not keeping food down, she needs to be taken to an ER and put on a glucose IV - just saline and sugar.  No lipids, which are fats which contribute to the problem, and apparently commonly used in IVs - it was the ER doctor's main question the first time this baby went in, answered clearly in the letter from the baby's metabolic specialist to the ER doctors.  First time was two nights in the ER, second time was one night.  Just kept on the IV until she could keep down food reliably (formula / breast milk).  So, while the serious need to get to an ER is certainly exciting, treatment was very straightforward.  She's about three months old, and this has happened twice. —
Darxus (talk) 18:12, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  My experience 

message: I just finished and copied over from my user page, a fairly major rewrite of the article.  Reliable, secondary sources, and hopefully fairly understandable. Canada Hky (talk) 23:40, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: I have added the ICD-10 Code as per the reference but the connecting link does not seem to work. I cannot detect the problem. I would be glad if somebody can contribute.
DiptanshuTalk 04:28, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: ICD-10 Code
Category talk:Dutch painters

message: 40 of these painters with a surname prefixed by the article "van" sort on the surname, not the "van".
8 of these painters, including "Vincent van Gogh", sort on the article "van" first, then the surname.
It should probably be consistent. for all categories that include someone with a Dutch name.  Personally, I think we should sort on the article first.  --  Geo Swan 02:16, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  sort order
Talk:Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

message: Can we really consider Geothe to be a romantic writer?
He should be considered a pre-romantic, he is closely associated with Weimar Classicism and the Sturm und Drang movements, which paved the way for the Romantic movement, but cannot truly be considered part of the Romantic movement.
Dadadali 21:12, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goethe: A Romantic writer? 

message: I am very confused as to why the "Works" heading contains a list of works about Goethe rather than his own works, particularly since there is a link at the top of the section linked to the article on Goethe's biography. If anything, these could go under the See Also heading rather than misleading people into assuming they are about Goethe. DynaGuy00 (talk) 14:52, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography and "Works" Heading 

message: The factbox gives Goethe's nationality as "German". Isn't this anachronistic? No doubt he is regarded by modern Germans as "German", and as the greatest German writer, but since there was no country called "Germany" then, surely he was not a "German national".
59.153.114.235 (talk) 23:50, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no  parameter in Template:Infobox writer; so it'll better stay as it is. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:44, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't fill para nationality, and suggest to do so here as well. Places of birth and death should suggest sufficiently where to locate him in history. - Will do, please discuss here if you think differently. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:24, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Calling Goethe "German" is anachronistic, and I agree that the "nationality" parameter is better left blank. Carlstak (talk) 11:51, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

text: Thank you. 157.7.194.173 (talk) 12:13, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goethe's nationality "German"? 

message: Should mention be made of Goethe's drawings?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.244.137.86 (talk) 02:37, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amateur Artist 

message: is there a reason the pronunciation is in a footnote not next to his name as usual?
Bufobuff (talk) 22:55, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just to make the lead section less cluttered. Kornatice (talk) 00:43, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ipa