lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Máté Zalka

message: I don't know whether "Mátészalka" "was later renamed in (Mate Zalka's) honour", but it would be better to mention that he took the penname which later became his official name, after the name of the place where he studied.
It isn't mentioned that Zalka took part in the Civil War in Russia, on the side of Bolsheviks.
I have never seen any references to Zalka's participation in any war in Turkey, not that he was called by a Hungarian word for "general" there.
The name of Zalka's daughter, "Talocska" is for some reason spelled in Hungarian. In English it should be spelled "Talochka", which is diminutive of Russian name Natalia (Наталия). If her death really had anything to do with Chernobyl, the fact should be substantiated somehow.
I've removed supposition that Stalin was so much afraid of Zalka's popularity that he organized artillery bombardment of his car by Nationalists as doubtful.
Sorry for my English
----
It was presumably the school that was renamed. The town was not; this is a very old village/town in Hungary. It was formed from 4 villages going back to the 1200-s; two with name variants of "Máté" and two of "Szalka". In fact I seem to remember reading that in fact Zalka took his alias from the name of his birhtplace.kovesp (talk) 17:49, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the references the article gives,about a suposedly being written by a family member of Zalka not only is it hard to prove but even if proven it doesnt comply with wikipedia policies,and the five pillars.--Andres rojas22 21:12, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:German Flatts, New York

message: This article and many others in and around Herkimer County, New York is continually being vandalized by the addition and reversion to show silly content by a persistent vandal, who has used many different names {see Herkimer village talk), and has been blocked under most of them. Stepp-Wulf 01:13, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Other references state that the towns of Herkimer and German Flatts were incorporated in 1788.
2602:304:CDA6:51B0:8DEF:2AB:C283:BB67 (talk) 00:32, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorporated in 1788, not 1791 

message: Is it possible for someone to explain the difference between the place names of German Flats, German Flatts, and Herkimer? The article confuses me a bit. The history section of German Flatts starts by telling about Herkimer, an "area[s] of the Burnetsfield Patent," a statement that is confirmed by looking at diagrams of the Patent. The same paragraph later says that "the village was attacked by French...." What village is it referring to? How does the "area" of Herkimer relate to German Flatts and the "village" in that sentence?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JeffreyMGeorge (talk • contribs) 20:13, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Clarification 

message: The cited raid occurred on the north side of the river, in the German Flats District, not within the boundaries of the future town of German Flatts. There were no incorporated towns in the western Mohawk Valley at that time. A survey by Albany County, preparing for the 1788 formation of the towns of Herkimer and German Flatts (2 "t"'s this time) had placed Herkimer on the south side of the river, where General Herkimer lived, and German Flatts on the north side. A bureaucratic error occurring before the resolutions were passed reversed the names. It was too late for correction, so those town names stuck. Probably the best reference for the Mohawk Valley is "So It Was Written, A Time of Terror, Part II", by A. Joyce Berry.
2602:304:CDA6:51B0:2CC5:61B2:3A39:5A6F (talk) 22:22, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification regarding place names 
Talk:JFace

message: I have created a revised page at JFace/Temp which uses a minimal amount of content from the Eclipse wiki's original page here. As noted in their legal notice, all content unless otherwise specified is released under the Eclipse Public License, which is incompatible with the GNU General Public License. However, I am not sure as to whether this conflicts with the GNU Free Documentation License or not. -- Remy Suen 01:14, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Golf School District 67

message: I graduate this year, and also Mr. Smith isn't the principal of Hynes anymore, what did he do? 12.24.169.226 (talk) 17:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bro this school is absolute garbage
Talk:Haakon III

message: Haakon III of Norway: Why not rename the name of the article to the proper one, Håkon? The use of double aa for å was in use in Norway in the 1800s and in the beginning of 1900s and there is only one (1) Norwegian king that is spelled Haakon and that is king Haakon the 7th. I really hate to see the double aa. --FinnBjo 01:17, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How is the "existence" of Haakon III's mother disputed ?    The identity of his mother may be in some doubt,   but her existence is surely not in doubt.   He was not given birth to by his father,  nor was he delivered by a stork or found in a cabbage patch.Eregli bob (talk) 18:47, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mother ? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 06:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Haakon III of Norway →  – There are no other monarchs with this exact name and numeral. Векочел (talk) 20:32, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

text: Support alternative move to Haakon Sverresson for more consistency in names of older Scandinavian monarchs.  Killuminator (talk) 14:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

text: Support because NCROY, PRECISION (unnecessary disambiguation), CONCISION, COMMONNAME, … —В²C ☎ 04:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

text: Support per nom and B2C. The alternative suggestion by Killuminator is not bad either, the patronymic seems to be roughly as common as the numeral in reliable sources (this is only based on a quick analysis Ngrams and GBooks searches). However, Haakon III is more concise and consistency favors the numeral if one compares to Haakon II and Haakon IV (the choice of whom to compare with is somewhat arbitrary). Jähmefyysikko (talk) 07:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

text: Support per nom. I slightly prefer Killuminator's alternative suggestion, as it would appear more common based on ngrams . However, I am fine with either proposal. estar8806 (talk) ★ 01:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 May 2024
Talk:Pixie dust

message: Aside from the apparently dated information presented as current ("this summer" etc.), the article seems to be mashing two subjects into one (technology and mythology) when they would be better served as seperate articles.  --Numsgil 01:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe even deletion.  I know there isn't enough to say about the Disney conception of the stuff to make an article about it. - JasonAQuest (talk) 15:20, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

message: This article says right in the opening sentence that it is about a fictional substance.  Please don't add information about something in the real world that goes by the same name.  Create a separate article about it if it's notable enough. - JasonAQuest (talk) 18:06, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact vs. Fiction 

message: I don't know why this is tagged for the Occult and Paranormal wikiprojects, because there's nothing related to that in this article.  I don't even see any evidence that pixie dust is "real" in the sense of being something that was found in legend or folklore before J.M. Barrie made it up for his Peter Pan story.  In other words, it doesn't appear that anyone seriously believes (or believed) it exists, even in an occult or paranormal context.  Furthermore, this article seems to act as nothing more than a magnet for unsourced anecdotal trivia about how somebody somewhere called something "pixie dust".  So I propose redirecting this to Tinker Bell or Disney Fairies. - JasonAQuest (talk) 17:22, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've redirected to Tinker Bell, which is what all of the sort-of-information in the article was about. - JasonAQuest (talk) 20:40, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've restored the redirect, because the material dumped back into this article was a mixture of unsourced original research, nonsense, and material that belongs in the articles about Peter Pan and Tinker Bell.  I've salvaged the few bits of actual info and placed them in the appropriate articles.  I've seen no justification restoring this as an article; it is not a subject that warrants one.  - Jason A. Quest (talk) 01:36, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm redirecting this to the disambiguation page because "pixie dust" now has multiple meanings.--Chris (talk) 06:43, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No it doesn't.  It's been used in various places as a metaphor.  Just because someone says "X is like pixie dust" or "X is so magical that we call it 'pixie dust'" that doesn't make it a popular use of the phrase.  This is not a list of every possible thing that's been called "pixie dust".  Please see WP:DAB: "A disambiguation page is not a list of dictionary definitions." - Jason A. Quest (talk) 12:19, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, after removing the redundant items, cruft, and a barely-notable X-Men character (referenced in a hatnote on the Tinker Bell article), we're back to a simple redirect. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 22:31, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Everything's Gone Green (film)

message: I don't know much about the movie or the New Order song Everything's Gone Green, but the movie title is presumably a reference. Should there be a comment saying so? Anybody have a reference discussing the connection? Gmarsden 16:28, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Order reference? 
Talk:Deng Sui

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 20:40, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: *Was Deng Sui involved in the development of paper with Cai Lun ?--Peta 01:24, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no evidence of it.  Didn't mean she wasn't, but it would be speculative to suggest that she was, I think.  --Nlu (talk) 02:17, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Paper?
Talk:University of New England Students' Association

message: I've made an attempt at cleaning up this article but it's still wildly biased. It really needs some work from someone who's close enough to be able to document it accurately but cool-headed enough not let it lapse into a rant. Student politics in Australia are undergoing some big changes at the moment and it would be worth having an unbiased account. - Gimboid13 01:28, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: Tagged to be updated. Association no longer exists. --Biggles 09:45, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: This article needs sources! Here are some:UNE News and Events University of New England vs Samantha Aber Article about Liberal club controversy 
Also it is full of unreferenced claims and opinion.--SevernSevern (talk) 03:19, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems
Talk:Battle of Jankau

message: I see that this is already marked B class. I agree that it meets all qualifications for B class. Djmaschek (talk) 05:15, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: B class review

message: There are several places with the name Staré Sedlo in Bohemia, and it is quite clear that Staré Sedlo near Tachov has nothing to do with the battle of Jankov. Correct place called Staré Sedlo is now a part of Orlík nad Vltavou. See https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star%C3%A9_Sedlo_(Orl%C3%ADk_nad_Vltavou)
147.231.52.62 (talk) 19:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Staré Sedlo
Talk:Thelemic gematria

message: The heading for this article doesnt make any sense. How is a cipher specific to Liber AL "Thelmic Gematria" exactly? Deosnt make any sense. Just bad grammar, plain and simple. The heading should be changed to something along the lines of "Liber AL cipher" or "RPSTOVAL cipher".Also this topic doesnt merit its own page. It would be better has a sub section under the Liber AL article.--Redblossom (talk) 12:17, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems there are many systems of English gematria, and not all of them are Thelemic. The article should be moved to English gematria and expanded to include them. QaBobAllah (talk) 01:40, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk:196th Battalion (Western Universities), CEF

message: The PPCLI's last recruits enlisted for it specifically were also from universities(McGill and University of Toronto). The first ones were ex military, cowboys and lumberjacks 2607:FEA8:79EF:8E00:DCAA:1303:E410:A782 (talk) 02:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The PPCLI's last recruits enlisted for it specifically were also from universities(McGill and University of Toronto). The first ones were ex military, cowboys and lumberjacks
Talk:Battle of Humin-Bolimów

message: Does any one know what the Russian commander Smirnov's first name was?  I've spent several days trying to find out, and thus far have come up empty handed. —Salmar 01:08, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Found! It was Vladimir Vasil'evič Smirnov. Source: :ru:2-я армия (Россия). I invite those interested in this battle to have a look at my version at it.wiki --Gengis Gat (talk) 20:04, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This appears to be the article about him at ru Wikipedia: Смирнов, Владимир Васильевич (генерал) — "Vladimir Vasilyevich Smirnov" —Salmar (talk) 13:20, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smirnov's first name? 

message: I searched a bit on the internet fot Bolimov and couldn't find anything however after searching on google maps I did find Bolimów,
Poland. If this is the real name we should change the title. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.213.67.178 (talk) 15:52, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, the real name of the town is Bolimów, not Bolimov (the latter is a transliteration of the Russian spelling of the town). As such, I suggest renaming this article to Battle of Bolimów.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  19:10, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I realize that this is an awfully long time later to respond, and I have no idea whether anyone is watching this page, but I don't know whether this move was a good idea without further discussion. Most sources I've seen (I'll admit that I haven't studied the matter comprehensively) refer to this as the "Battle of Bolimov", and many that use "Battle of Bolimów" seem to be quoting, or mirrors of, this article. That "Bolimov" is the Russian spelling is not surprising because, at the time that the battle occurred, Bolimov/Bolimów was part of the Russian Empire. That the town is now called by the (I presume Polish) name "Bolimów" is a good reason to rename the article about the town, just as the article about the city formerly known as "Tsaritsyn" and "Stalingrad" is located at its current name, Volgograd. But we have not attempted to rename the Battle of Tsaritsyn or the Battle of Stalingrad the "Battle of Volgograd"! —Salmar (talk) 00:11, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real Name of Town?
Talk:Battle of Dujaila

message: I made the changes to the article (05:47, 12 August 2009 69.181.207.29 (talk) (16,136 bytes) (expanded information on the battle and combatants). There was a problem when I hit save. Any errors are mine, not some nameless person with just an IP. --HistorianBell 05:55, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fatal Instinct

message: Hardly a distinction and not sourced. Removed this line. 12.162.122.6 (talk) 20:58, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "The film is occasionally aired on Comedy Central."

message: Why is this article have a tag for Yiddish language film? The most we see is the two characters chatting in Yiddish while incognito in the park. The rest of the film is entirely in English. The tag should only apply to films whose diologue is primarily in that language. 108.57.80.72 (talk) 22:00, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yiddish language film? 

message: User:7dcf does little on Wikipedia except add links to movie reviews by James Berardinelli, and he had been edit-warring with at least two editors, User:BilCat and myself, to add this promotional linkspam to this article and to  :Welcome to Mooseport here and others. He appears to be either James Berardinelli himself or a meat-puppet. And he is violating WP:BRD by re-reverting and not coming to the talk page to discuss and to try to reach consensus with other editors. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:29, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Promotional linkspam
Talk:Battle of Providien

message: http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/yourpaintings/paintings/the-action-off-providien-11632
©Geni 14:48, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible pic

message: The page, at this time, is listed as part of the American Revolution in [https://books.google.com/books?id=AE8dQ8gvow8C&pg=PT170&dq=Battle%20of%20Providien%20revolutionary%20war&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjZ0Ja3jMfRAhUL3IMKHbBpBTEQ6AEIIDAB#v=onepage&q=Battle%20of%20Providien%20revolutionary%20war&f=false Battle at Sea: 3,000 Years of Naval Warfare
By R.G. Grant]. However, it was between the French and British off the coast of India in 1782. An IP is changing content to it being the Anglo-French War (1778–1783). Not sure what to make of this. Jim1138 (talk) 01:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whose war?
Talk:Battle of Negapatam (1782)

message: Now that you've made your disagreement known, it's necessary to discuss it on the talk page rather than continue with the revert/revert business. Given the battle was marked as inconclusive, worrying about which side gets to consider it a victory seems petty. What are your arguments?  —jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 22:34, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's entirely possible that sources written by interested parties may have conflicting opinions about who gained the most. That should be represented in the article rather than giving only one side's view.  —jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 06:46, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I will join in here - the new source doesn't explain why, whilst the previous (unexplained deleted) sources in the article does. So perhaps we can have a few quotes of Caastex to show this?  Shire Lord  (talk) 12:55, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Wrong, wrong and wrong. I didn't deleted anything, the sources were written on the article and don't said anything about a supposed british strategic victory and to quote Claastex (my translation): "This battle wasn't determinant. But it quite served the French. The next day, the French squadron sailed for Cuddalore."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheMedian (talk • contribs) 14:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Stop edit-warring
Talk:Morris Hills Regional High School District

message: Question, why is it called a "comprehensive" school district if it only includes high schools?  And, hey, do Hills and Knolls still play against each other in football?  What do we eat, what do we eat, Eagle meat, Eagle meat, how do we like it, how do we like it, raw raw raw!  (Hills class of 70-something here.)   6SJ7 01:43, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Change management (ITSM)

message: It needs to be noted that Change Evaluation redirects to Change Mangement and these are 2 different ITIL topics.  Related, but different -- not the same.  Also, with regard to "de-ITIL'izing" Change Management and that ITIL didn't invent it, while these are good points, ITIL is it's own philosophy.  It is also recognized by international copyrights.  Hobson-Johnson'ing it with similar topics just gums it up.
Change Evaluation (back to the topic) should be on its own page.
Definition -- change evaluation (ITIL Service Transition) The process responsible for formal assessment of a new or changed IT service to ensure that risks have been managed and to help determine whether to authorize the change. 
 
(ITIL® glossary and abbreviations, http://www.itil-officialsite.com/InternationalActivities/TranslatedGlossaries.aspx )
PostalMike523 (talk) 14:30, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

message: I am taking the merge recommendations the other direction, stripping down the ITIL article section to a pointer to this. This article needs further work, but I want to get people's reaction to the overall direction. The primary need is to continue to "de-ITILize" Change Management, which has various representations - e.g. IBM Yellow Books, Harris Kern Library, and I suspect numerous other variants. My goal is to fairly represent the ITIL take on Change as one perspective among many, and one that has some particular problems, scope creep in particular.Charles T. Betz 01:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merges

message: This is not an officially recognized organization and was only recently created, possibly a con. Links to it should be considered spam.—Ash (talk) 02:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to itsmpa.org
Talk:Hepialoidea

message: No fossils from dinosaurian times? A bit surprising to me. 85.76.99.100 (talk) 05:18, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

message: The article is very poor in contents and gives the reader insufficient informations about the topic. 
The page should be improved by adding more details and informations about Hepialodea, as well as more paragraphs, in order to make the article more complete.
--LIUC.Camilla03 (talk) 16:16, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions to improve the page
Talk:Gelechioidea

message: Have you been here yet?
Looks like either you or somebody who has read your Gelechioidea website has :)
"Gelechioidea is a large, poorly understood  superfamily of Lepidoptera, composed of approximately 1,425 genera and 16,250 species (Hodges, 1998). Hodges estimates that only 25% of the species diversity of Gelechioidea has been described. If this estimate is accurate, diversity of Gelechioidea would rival that of the Noctuoidea, with total species reaching counts of almost 65,000 species." - http://gelechioidea.info/overview.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.41.233.164 (talk) 00:40, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Bucheli?
Talk:Drepanoidea

message: "There are about 129 genera, distributed worldwide. " - Drepanidae alone has about 190 genera and some 1000 species. Dysmorodrepanis 12:19, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thought, it seems that the number of genera is far lower. In any case, List of drepanid genera is in need of thorough revision. I don't think I'll do it tho. Dysmorodrepanis 12:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Diversity
Talk:Campaigns of 1794 in the French Revolutionary Wars

message: Its not mentioned, but should someone become interested, here is Hood's fleet list:
*Alcide, 74, Com. R. Linzee, Capt J. Woodley 
*Aurore, 32, Wm. Essington
*Captain, 74, S. Reeve 
*Egmont, 74, A. Dickson 
*Fortitude, 74, W. Young 
*L'Impeneuse, 40, W. Wolseley 
*Le Jean Bart (gunboat) 
*Juno, 32, S. Hood
*Meleager, 32, C. Tyler
*Princess Royal, 98, Rear-Adm. S. G. Goodall, Capt J. C. Purvis, 
*Romulus, 36, J. Sutton; 
*Rose (cut), 
*St. George, 98, Rear-Adm. Gell, Capt T. Foley; 
*Victory, 100, Adra. Lord Hood, Capt J. N. Inglefield, and Capt J. Knight,
*Agamemnon, 74, H. Nelson ; 
*Cyclops, 28, D. Gould; 
*L'Eclair, 20, G. H. Towry; 
*Fox. (cut),  
*Gorgon, 44, J. Wallis; 
*Illustrious, 74, T. L. Frederick; 
*Modeste, 40, T. B. Martin; 
*Nemesis, 28, S. H. Linzee 
*Proselyte, 24,
*Sincere, 18,
*Swallow (cut), 
*L'Aigle, 36, S. Hood 
*L'Aimable, 32, Sir H. Burrard, bart. 
*Dido, 28, Sir C. Hamilton, bart.
*Dolphin (hired ship), 44, Lieut R. Retalick 
*Lowestoffe, 32, B. Hallowell
*La Lutine, 32, 
*Sincerity (cut.)
114.78.78.180 (talk) 07:55, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  British Corsican campaign