Talk:Anarchism without adjectives

message: What no mention of these?  I notice that in older variations of this page they were mentioned.  Do people think that they should be excluded from adjective free anarchism?  --AFA 05:45, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither existed when "anarchism without adjectives" was first used. It is doubtful that Malatesta would have included either of them in the anarchist camp, for example. BlackFlag 09:19, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  anarcho-capitalism and "national anarchism" 

message: Please don't try and bring it onto this page. It isn't relevant and I will resist such attempts. Many happy returns... Wtfaaaaa 14:47, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  anarcho-capitalism 

message: Is it relevant that the writers of the An Anarchist FAQ say that anarchists without adjectives should not tolerate anarcho-capitalism? They themselves are not anarchists without adjectives so what's the point of including this? OF COURSE the writers of An Anarchist FAQ are going to be opposed against anarchists without adjectives tolerating anarcho-capitalism. They're not anarchists without adjectives! Anarchists without adjectives by definition tolerate all schools as long as they don't want to force others to join their system. Operation Spooner (talk) 01:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Stop making sense! neutral points of view and historical accuracy are strictly and implicitly forbidden here on wikipedia.  --Thorsmitersaw  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.78.145.1 (talk) 17:18, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  An Anarchist FAQ 

message: Why are they listed as part of the "Anarchists without adjectives" infobox? Rocker was a syndicalist, and Malatesta was a communist. I think it's factually incorrect to describe either of them as anarchists without adjectives. Supersheep (talk) 17:23, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They are included in  navigational template because they both cited as anarchists without adjectives.
*Malatesta
*Again 
*Rocker. Skomorokh 18:04, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malatesta and Rocker 

message: "It seems like everyone who's an anarchist these days uses the word 'anarcho-' as a prefix to attach to everything they like, to the point where it's not even really meaningful anymore." Tisane (talk) 19:28, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  LaughingMan0X quote 

message: I don't know if this article has done much for me, as far as I can see, most anarchists in my neck of the woods hang out around seedy looking bookshops reading mouldy old books. But it did give me a wonderful new concept. I can now refer to someone as being an "unhypenated arsehole". It seems to mean so much more. Myles325a (talk) 11:27, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  new concept 

message: This edit removed the following
:
While I didn't remove this, I wanted to leave a note here in case anyone chose to revert the edit thinking it was vandalism. I checked that book and it says nothing of the kind. What is stated on that page is one person's opinion.
:
Overlooking that it is just Fred Woodworth's opinion, the quote above doesn't state that anarcho-capitalism is compatible with anarchism without adjectives. He claims to be an anarchist without adjectives because he believes that many variations could work.
This was added by OhByJingo in an edit which also fudged a referenced quote by slipping in another bit about anarcho-capitalism even though the original quote said no such thing. Anarcham (talk) 21:21, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anarcho-capitalism 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:36, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: This sentence doesn't make sense, but I don't know enough about the subject to fix it. The problem is that anarcho-communism is contrasted to itself. One of these must be anarcho-capitalism or something, right?
"As time progressed, most anarcho-communists saw that ignoring the labour movement ensured that their ideas did not reach the working class while most anarcho-communists stressed their commitment to communist ideals and their arrival sooner, rather than later, after a revolution."
104.32.149.71 (talk) 15:25, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsensical sentence