Talk:Albert Rosellini

message: What the hell is this: "Alleged reports have been filed with Law Enforcement that have Rosellini either linked or involved in Organized Crime at a high-ranking level as Boss or Top Advisor to the Colacurcio Crime Family based in Seattle." Since when are the terms "law enforcement" "organized crime" "top advisor" "top advisor", etc. capitalized? C'mon people - let's respect the integrity of Wikipedia and refrain from putting crap like this in it! Whoever wrote that is not only factually challenged, but also has a major literacy problem. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dmanning (talk • contribs) 07:32, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved comment from 209.91.49.157

message: This article has been heavily sanitized and reads like a hagiography rather than a biography. It also takes a very informal tone. The article itself should not refer to its subject by an affectionate nickname (i.e., "The Gov"), though it may certainly provide a cite and note that others use this term of endearment. What's more, while it lists Gov. Rosellini's accomplishments and quotes a number of very nostalgic, glowing character pieces, it mentions none of the controversy or allegations that surrounded his leaving office - all of which are a part of his legacy. It glaringly omits his long, public, and often criticized ties with Frank Colacurcio Sr that date back to the 1940's. One may certainly say allegations of misconduct were never substantiated, but to pretend they were never made, or that the police did not question "The Gov" pertaining to his acquaintance with Colacurcio, let alone the "Strippergate" affair, is bad faith. There is a difference between a fair, critical biographical article and a white washed piece of candidate propaganda. He was an effective governor. He was also one with some controversy attached to him. As a public figure he has to live with that being a part of his public legacy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.139.181.179 (talk) 00:04, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this a hagiography or biography?

message: Who was his GOP opponent in the 1956 election? Did he win overwhelmingly, solidly, or (as in 1960) barely? I'm surprised these matters are not mentioned. --Haruo (talk) 03:24, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  1956 opponent? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Albert Rosellini. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050123013229/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002156584_danny21.html to http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002156584_danny21.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:17, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I leave it to someone else to decide, but I think :File:Gov. Albert D. Rosellini, ca. 1957 - DPLA - a46b08ab81da3ed47704a67d3b7fd9cf (page 1) (cropped).jpg may be a better photo of him than the one currently in the Infobox. - Jmabel | Talk 02:00, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image