lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Black Star Canyon

message: I have had numerous interesting experiences in Black Star, driving down Holy Jim Trail, etc. You can see bullet holes in the signs so the locals are definitely armed, I'd say! There was this old farmhouse that looked abandoned for years and had an egg farm ruin on its land but it looked as though someone was still farming the land. We investigated it a few times and my ex bf swears he saw Satanic stuff in its basement. Quite scary! Someone said they tore it down, I hope not because I would love to see it again. Does anyone know if it's still there? 66.27.142.227 (talk) 15:34, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Liam Rector

message: I have rated this as stub, as it contains very limited information, and a low priority because he's not likely to have been heard of outside of his field, though if I am wrong, please correct the priority. Canadian Paul 22:37, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:There Goes Old Georgetown

message: I moved the lyrics to Wikisource, per the central discussion, but I do not believe the central discussion mandated that all fight songs be merged with the university article. If this were to be suggested, I would expect a standard merge discussion regardless. Thanks!--Patrick «» 16:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Just following wp:BRD. I was not merging those songs which had a life of their own outside of the Universities' athletic departments, or had a very long and well sourced article. This particular one is halfway in between, as it has a lot written, but isn't well sourced and doesn't provide any more info that how to sing it. I've merged the text into the main U.'s article, so lets see how that goes. Meanwhile I'd like to see if we can get consensus per existing global consensus at Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Fight songs to redirect this to the main U.'s page. NJGW (talk) 18:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Besides the problems of dumping this article in without copyediting or locating sources, the fight song is a minor part of the University, and three whole paragraphs in addition to the note in the Athletics section looks painfully out of place in the the main U.'s page. As I've said, it goes much better on the Georgetown Hoyas article, where this article was split off from and where I've kept a short section about it. Doesn't that make more sense to you? Not the main university page, which is primarily about academics, but the athletics page instead. As I read it, the decision was only that "fight song information has a place in the main university page," not that all articles must immediately be merged without specific discussion. Lastly, I don't expect a problem proving notability here, and I don't see any consensus for wholesale deletion of articles. Therefore, I will revert the dumping of this page into Georgetown University.--Patrick «» 20:58, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no policy or consensus on removing public domain lyrics from any article as long as the lyrics is not the sole component of the article (see WP:LYRICS). The highly questionable "consensus" reached at the general discussion referenced by NJGW contradicts existing policy stated at WP:Lyrics and consensus at WP:SONG#LYRICS. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Lyrics for more information. CrazyPaco (talk) 05:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I don't know the copyright status. As the article states, two of the three songs were written before 1923, but the third wasn't, and the combined version wasn't published until 1930. However, there is no known author and I don't know if the school could even claim ownership if they wanted. So I'll play nice and safe and leave the lyrics at WikiSource, where I moved them this week.--Patrick «» 07:33, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikisource
Talk:Julienne Irwin

message: Anyone else notice that she resembles host of So you thing you can dance, Cat Deeley? Acceptable 01:58, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resemblance to Cat Deely 

message: I have spent time following Julienne Irwin's rise to fame and I feel I have some good information to add and corrections to make to the current text.  I would like to start with the songs she sang in the AGT competition (one was omitted) and add the names of the songwriters.  I can pretty much use local links into Wikipedia to support this update.
Any suggestions?  Should I just start typing?  ;-)
I have read many of the guideline pages, I really just want someone to watch over my shoulder so I don't mess things up too much. :-)
Later when I get the hang of this, I would like to update the current status of some of her projects, citing newspaper reports as the source. 
JoeRUBZ 03:12, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am a new contributor and would like to learn how to add information to this page. 

message: The most common thing in an encyclopedia bio was the birth date.  In deciding how to improve this page, I have been checking comparable musicians, for instance Taylor Swift.  She does have the exact birth date there.  Then it dawned on me, with identity theft becoming the number one crime, and with Irwin as young as she is, one thing she probably does not need is the hassle of clearing such a theft up. Keeping a bio birth date private could make it more difficult for thieves.  At most, I may just enter the year of birth, but no more.  Please consider do the same :-)
JoeRUBZ 16:43, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please don't add her exact birthday :-) 

message: I have found very good pics of her  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lionstar22 (talk • contribs) 00:50, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do we add pics of Julienne Irwin?
Talk:Index of metaphysics articles

message: Why is there a link to Vladimir Antonov here? The page is a disambiguation page pointing at two different people with that name: Vladimir Antonov-Ovseyenko and Vladimir Aleksandrovich Antonov. Neither of them seems to be related to metaphysics. Is there a third person with that name? I'm removing the link now since it seems to be misplaced. The link was added in 2010 by User:Gregbard. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:48, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vladimir Antonov
Talk:Alfred Noble Prize

message: The prize is called the Nobel Prize. The spelling is 'Nobel', not 'Noble'!
:If you had read the article carefully, you would have noticed that this is a different award unrelated to more well-known Nobel Prize. --Hdt83  Chat 21:56, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked this out and its seems to be fixed. Cheers Risk Engineer (talk) 14:20, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Rainie Cross

message: Just letting you know there is a good one interview with Franks in Inside Soap - that's if you didn't know already.Rain the 1 BAM 20:59, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Dont mean to be rude, but can you give me the info form the poll? Like who was in it, what it was about etc. MayhemMario 20:18, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

text: I don't think that poll is worthy of inclusion. –anemoneprojectors– 13:23, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inside Soap 

message: * - Couldn't agree more with this observation.RaintheOne BAM 23:14, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: This edit summary seems fine but I can't see it on these puters. Can someone explain just so I know? –anemoneprojectors– 15:51, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The Queen Vic bust talks about the recent departee's of Walford and Rainie is shown along with others. GSorby – Ping! 16:00, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. Does that mean the actress left the cast, or just that the character departed Walford? –anemoneprojectors– 16:32, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: She did the usual disappear at Christmas act. Makes me wonder if Franks was in panto or booked extended leave. If that's the case I predict a return by approximately March. George, I thought you actually had spoken to Franks, and she said she wasnt leaving?GunGagdinMoan 18:56, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  It showed Grace has departed too. Now Im not a TV producer, but even I can figure out that if the character has departed, then at least give her a) a departure storyline b) an on-screen minor comment about her moving? MayhemMario 18:59, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "See the queen speech on the EastEnders website" 

message: I know there are certain rules regarding the duration if the character's appearances are more than a year apart, however I do think we should revise this for the case of Rainie. She did not appear continuously between 2007-2008, or between 2010 and 2011. She was a recurring character with short stints, surely this should be detailed in the duration? Alex250P (talk) 12:31, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: To be honest, she was a character who appeared between 2007 and 2011, so we could put 2007-11 and it would still be right. Saying 2007-08 and 2010-11 is also correct. 2007, 2008, 2010, 2011 is also correct but looks a bit long. I don't see why Rainie should be an exception to the rule - I can understand some others but not this one. –anemoneprojectors– 18:51, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Duration
Talk:Craig Heap

message: It would be great if someone could add a D.o.B for the article, also the history section could do with more expansion. I dont really have much knowledge of Gymnasts so if someone with a interest in the subject could expand this article it would be great--Childzy ¤ Talk 22:04, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just about to -- ratarsed (talk) 19:24, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth and expansion
Talk:Lojban/Archive statistics

message: :There are 1342 canonical gismu.
I count 1436: http://www.lojban.org/publications/wordlists/gismu.txt has 1438 lines. Subtract one line for the header and one for the blank line at the end, and you have 1436. It looks to me that every single other line defines a gismu. - furrykef (Talk at me) 07:30, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that list of gismu also includes cmavo if they have rafsi.—Nat Krause(Talk!·What have I done?) 07:44, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, you're right. The document's name is misleading, then. - furrykef (Talk at me) 05:05, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: .ie—Nat Krause(Talk!·What have I done?) 05:30, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of gismu
Talk:Elizabeth Nourse

message: Expanded at the Meetup/DC/LuceLunder editathon, but still needs work. Maybe we/I/someone/etc should use the articles on Bronwyn Bancroft and Robert Peake the elder as models to expand this. That might require reformatting things. I am only concerned about that because two of us were accidentally editing this one. Anyway, the important thing is that this is not nearly done yet. anamedperson (talk) 19:39, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not happy with how the format of this article turned out. I tried to change it around at one point but there was an error and I lost a lot of that work. I will probably come back and try to reconstruct that later. If someone else wants to try with that I wouldn't complain, though. anamedperson (talk) 20:51, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work in progress 
Talk:Crossclaim

message: I've resolved the issue, but noting it here for posterity/reference. As previously written, this article explained the "policy for allowing crossclaims"--which seemed correct to me, but needed citation (and a copyedit). In the course of looking for a good reference, I came across this Google Books result: Textbook on Legal Language and Legal Writing, by Prof. Dr. K. L. Bhatia (2010), at p.175. The definition there appears to be an exact duplicate of a former version of this article. I note that the book has a copyright date of 2010, while some of the text at issue has been in this article since it was first drafted in 2006. So I'm not asserting that the Wikipedia editor committed any plagiarism. In any case, the text was uncited, and once I found an acceptable source (which was more difficult than I had expected), I thought it best to go ahead and rewrite the text to better reflect my source and, incidentally, to differentiate it more from Prof. Bhatia's book. --EightYearBreak (talk)  14:37, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article text matched a book
Talk:Chief petty officer, 1st class

message: This information is completely wrong.  Nothing indicated above is true.  The person submitting this page has no knowledge of Navy ranks and/or ratings.
F. G. SYKES
US NAVY (Retired)
You do know that this is about the Canadian Navy, right?  Information here is completely accurate.  DP.
The only error in this article is that the Base CPO, Fleet CPO,and Formation CPO now all use the same rank insignia (The Coat of Arms above the Canadian Forces insignia).  This is the common insignia for all Canadian Forces Senior Appointments with the exception of Command CPO1/CWO and the Canadian Forces CWO which are correctly described.
CPO1 M. Magee  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.176.10.176 (talk) 02:21, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Able Seaman (rank) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 23:46, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: I want to rename this article to Chief petty officer, 1st class (Canada). the reason for this is simple; there are a large number of countries that have this same rank, in one or more branches of their military. 
this change is actually uncontroversial; because right now, it is misleading for this article to point to the rank for only one country, rather than a group of countries. 
I will allow some time for others to comment; I hope to gain consensus, and then to proceed with this rename for this article. thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 18:44, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  request to rename this article
Talk:6th World Festival of Youth and Students

message: Thanks, Ghirlandajo, your edits and corrections are good and much appreciated. Regards, Steveshelokhonov 22:30, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are welcome. It so happens that I requested this article a month ago. It would have been great if we mentioned a baby boom that followed the festival. --Ghirla-трёп- 23:11, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, many social trends stemmed from that festival: inter-baby boom and fashions boom, as well as "stilyagi" and the 60s generation; it also "revolutionized" the currency trade and boosted the black market, and pushed guitars and tape recorders to masses, so the country's mentality was updated in many ways. Steveshelokhonov 20:08, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks,  [[Ghirlandajo]]

message: This 6th Festival FOLLOWS the 5th Festival and PRECEDES the 7th Festival. Infobox has it the other way around. 2A00:23C7:CA0C:4F01:4D0A:5CB0:B612:7E4F (talk) 08:08, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox Incorrect...
Talk:Removal jurisdiction

message: Toward the end of the article, criminal case removals are mentioned, but the first sentence might lead one to believe that removal to federal court only occurs in civil cases.  I suggest a new first sentence that discusses what a removal is, and then to restate the existing first sentence to begin discussion of civil removals. Pigdog234 (talk) 12:09, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  First sentence should introduce both civil and criminal removal
Talk:Snow pea

message: The text gives two speculations why it is called snow pea. Here is an alternative one that pops out when I was trying to explain to my curious-about-anything-and-everything kindergartener why it was so called: when eaten stir-fried, it sounds "crunch, crunch" just like walking on snow.
--Minimeme (talk) 16:11, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As in all things.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 (talk) 21:43, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name origin 

message: This should fix the confusion.
Micklweiss (talk) 04:20, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a particular problem with food and culinary articles. Many US editors are very reluctant to accept that their regional terminology isn't global, whereas in fact American food culture is fairly unique and isolated for lots of historical and economic reasons. It took over a decade to globalise the canola article, and rutabaga still causes problems for non-Americans. --Ef80 (talk) 15:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  added Mange Tout (disambiguation)
Talk:Alfred Jefferis Turner

message: As Anann, 'Gentle Annie" was responsible for instructing the dying, and also for culling the weak.  It is a strange nickname for a doctor whose career included fighting bubonic plague, and using diptheria anti-toxin against a major killer of children.  I suspect that this may be an example of medical humor. Pustelnik (talk) 03:46, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gentle Annie
Talk:Adelphi Genetics Forum

message: The EES and the Galton institute were different things, the Galton Institute was affiliated to UCL in the early C19, and is not a recently renamed version of the EES. They need separate articles. I will fix this soon but not tonight. Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 22:46, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This book is in part a history of the Eugenics Society written by a historian who appears to disagree - see its Preface: ".. the society itself has changed its name to the Galton Institute." Qwfp (talk) 20:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And if you check the Galton Institute web site, they say "The Galton Institute derives from the Eugenics Education Society which was founded in 1907" and states that the institute was founded in 1989. Thomas Blomberg (talk) 14:58, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the original commenter may be confusing the Galton Institute with the Galton Laboratory at UCL, which was originally endowed by Francis Galton for research into genetics and statistics.  It continued as a named unit at UCL at least until 2013, though it may now have been subsumed into a wider department.  It never had any formal connection with the EES, and in fact the early head of the Laboratory (Karl Pearson) was quite hostile to the EES.  The EES was at some point renamed simply the Eugenics Society, and much later as the Galton Institute.86.132.140.244 (talk) 21:15, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just a note to say The Galton Institute was renamed in 2021. I'm an inexperienced editor but when I've the time I'm happy to try and edit the page if no one else has. Dontgiveupthedayjob (talk) 12:46, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renamed The Adelphi Genetics Forum
Talk:Coole Pilate

message: I am unable to access population statistics, and have therefore included just the historical figures from Genuki. Espresso Addict 22:59, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing 2001 census figures
Talk:Kenneth D. Bailey (sociologist)

message: Due to possible violation of copyright, see WP:Copyvio, I have removed the worksection of this article for now. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 08:31, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worksection removed 
Talk:General Crook House

message: I think that the connection of this house with military history as usually imagined is rather tenuous, so I am removing the WPMILHIST template. PKKloeppel (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The house was built for and occupied by several of the commanders of the Department of the Platte, including George Crook. It is integral to the history of Fort Omaha, which in turn is vital to the history of the Midwestern United States and the U.S. Army's role there. I re-inserted the project. • Freechild'sup? 15:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: MILHIST
Talk:Tert-Butyllithium

message: Its a bit dramatic here! its not like it always bursts into flames!
Somebody help me out here - I added a link to tert-Butyllithium on the n-Butyllithium page, but it does not recognize this page.  What's the deal? Does capitalization matter? ChemistHans 23:18, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, links are case sensetive. Cheers, JetLover (talk) 23:18, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Shouldn't the title of this page be Tert-butyllithium? --Vuo 09:00, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  tert is a latin and so shouldn't be capitalised (in written text it should be italicised like n-, sec-, iso etc), but might be worth putting a re-direct from that page Seansheep (talk) 19:04, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  my bad, according to IUPAC iso shouldn't be italicised  Seansheep (talk) 19:08, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  discussions 

message: I've edited this before, then reverted because I wasn't sure; the end of the article says "This compound and other alkyllithium compounds are known to be unstable in ether solvents", but the intro reads "tert-Butyllithium is readily available commercially as solutions of ethers or hydrocarbons". Someone more knowledgeable who can confirm or deny? DS Belgium (talk) 15:37, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Available as solutions of ethers? 

message: I believe the systematic name of this compound is (1,1-dimethylethyl)lithium, but I'm no chemist so I'll leave this here rather than edit it into the article.
CRGreathouse (t | c) 15:23, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Systematic name
Talk:Rhonda Jo Petty

message: I notice that some effort appears to be being made to use recent photographs of adult film stars of the 70's through 90's, when most of them have lost some or most of their attractiveness. Contrast this to the 1968 picture of Brigette Bardot in her Wiki Article. This strikes me as a subtle but definite violation of the Wikipedia policy against expressing bias. Dick Kimball (talk) 21:57, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph
Talk:Glitter Boy

message: The similarities between the Glitter Boy's main weapon and the Gundam version are not great outside of the 'sight' on the top of the weapon, and certainly not great enough to warrant a set of comparison pictures. The two mecha otherwise bare no resemblance to each other, so I removed these pictures and the listed bit of trivia.  The resemblance is at best visible only from a certain point of view, and extremely slight. the infamous rmx 23:31, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Fantan Mojah

message: Anyone know his D.O.B.? I can't find it anywhere.Kgppra17 23:31, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth Date
Talk:History of Seattle (1940–present)

message: There's a lot of great information in this article, but the way is written just seems too casual and informal. Examples:
"The World's Fair arguably reenergized the downtown of Seattle, and was generally a smashing success, even finishing with a profit."
Vague words such as "arguably" and informal language like "smashing" you generally want to avoid.
"After the war, the University of Washington also took a step forward, finally fulfilling the promise of its name."
What does that part even mean? It seems like you're editorializing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.187.175.188 (talk) 07:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: So fix it. Skyerise (talk) 01:24, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone 
Talk:List of State Roads in Connecticut

message: how is this list, though it has some of the higher numbers, needed over this list https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_State_Routes_in_Connecticut, list of state routes in CT.  the state routes list seems a little better organized.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tommyborsh (talk • contribs) 19:11, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this be merged?