Talk:Azuchi–Momoyama period

message: I have just performed a major and, if I may say so myself, BOLD edit for readability. I hope that most people, even those with a vested interest in this article, will find that it is now much improved. If you don't, please dicuss the reasons here so that we can all work in the same direction instead of arguing back and forth.
===Major points===
*I have removed all the kanji except for 安土桃山時代 at the beginning of the article. This is an English language article and the gratuitous addition of a foreign language, especially at every instance of a name, is distracting. If someone has a problem with this, please let's discuss it here before we get into an editting war.
*I have tried my best to retain all the information that was in the earlier article, but I have done considerable rearranging and have also added a lot of new information. Please let's try to avoid duplicating the same information in different sections.
*I am not a professional historian and may have introduced some factual inaccuraries, for which I would appreciate corrections. I also, however, have removed more than a few, which I hope do not find their way back in. One example is the idea that any lord with a domain of 10,000 koku or more was a daimyo. To the best of my knkowledge, that particular distinction was implemented by the Edo bakufu and is irrelevant to this period,which predates that usage.
Spventi 06:24, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Major edit for readability

message: *I have removed all the kanji except for 安土桃山時代 at the beginning of the article. This is an English language article and the gratuitous addition of a foreign language, especially at every instance of a name, is distracting. If someone has a problem with this, please let's discuss it here before we get into an editting war.
*I have tried my best to retain all the information that was in the earlier article, but I have done considerable rearranging and have also added a lot of new information. Please let's try to avoid duplicating the same information in different sections.
*I am not a professional historian and may have introduced some factual inaccuraries, for which I would appreciate corrections. I also, however, have removed more than a few, which I hope do not find their way back in. One example is the idea that any lord with a domain of 10,000 koku or more was a daimyo. To the best of my knkowledge, that particular distinction was implemented by the Edo bakufu and is irrelevant to this period,which predates that usage.
Spventi 06:24, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Major points

message: The Korea conquest of Hideyoshi strongly influences the Toyotomi clan's fall and the Tokugawa clan's success. I wrote the first half of this article. Afterwards, the user Caspian blue rewrote it. 
He wrote the deletion reason. 
Any reason for deleting generals' name and replaced "A king"?
Two Koreans (Won Gyun and Yi Eok-gi) whom I deleted are not known in Japan.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eichikiyama (talk • contribs) 07:16, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Korean War

message: An edit war is tiresome, even for those who only watch from the sidelines.
Historiographer -- As you know, cooperation and consensus represents a better way forward.  You will notice that each paragraph has been tagged "citation needed."  Why not add citation support to at least one of the sentences you want to see in this article?  A small step in a constructive direction. --Tenmei (talk) 19:21, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cooperation/consensus

message: Historiographer -- Your persisting changes of a section heading do not encourage the development of consensus.  Without an accompanying discussion thread in this venue, your "edit war" tactic cannot become part of a process which evolves into a successful strategy.  Have you invested time in thinking about the differences between a mere "tactic" and a "strategy"? --Tenmei (talk) 18:24, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Section heading

message: Sengoku AND Muromachi... it makes no sense. I would think it's muromachi then Sengoku then Azuchi...--Hitsuji Kinno (talk) 01:59, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Preceded By

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:23, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion