lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Genghis Khan II: Clan of the Gray Wolf

message: I've recommended that this article be merged with Genghis Khan 2. Both articles are basically talking about the same game and perhaps merging the information from both authors will bump the article up from a stub level to a start level :). --Rambutaan 23:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I would be interested in learning more about the tactical battles. SharkD (talk) 05:35, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tactical battles
Talk:Cook–Craigie plan

message: I have to agree thoroughly with the need to improve this article. I have made some changes to that end, though I believe that still more could be done, so I have left the box in place for now. I have not been able to add anything to the original author's content, so perhaps another contributor would be able to expand the article further. I have added citation requests where I believe they are most necessary. I also think that the last sentence of the first paragraph in particular would benefit from a few specific examples; it is far too vague.
I have removed some content, as follows:
"When the changes settle down, a set of construction jigs are built and laid out on the factory floor, used to hold the various parts together while the aircraft is being built." - Taken from the second paragraph. The tone is not appropriate, but it may still be relevant to the article and worth keeping if it could be improved and expanded upon.
"...often long after the original designs were drawn up." - taken from the end of paragraph two. I think this is a vague statement, and probably stating the obvious when discussing post-war military avaiation development. Again, could be improved and re-added.
"Unfortunately the design was later cancelled, largely for economic and political reasons." - Taken from the reference to the aborted Avro Arrow. Seems to weaken the argument in favour of this development method.
Which brings me to my final comment. I this article does nothing, as it stands, to satisfactorily assess the significance of the Cook-Craigie system, as it fails to present clear arguments for and against beyond a very brief mention of the risks inherent in the development. There is certainly scope for expansion.
If anyone can do more to improve this article, feel free to edit my edits! -- Adrian M. H. 23:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Initial editing work
Talk:Neanderthal 1

message: Just a couple of questions I think this article should answer.
Was this the first neanderthal fossil identified as a new species?
Is this the most recent remains found of this species?
Soloist (talk) 07:41, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some questions 

message: Hi! 
I happened to come across the article a couple of days ago. It is in a rather pitiful state. Its German counterpart is a featured article, though. Since i like the subject and did a similar translation before (Mauer 1) - well, i am on it.
cheers
Wikirictor (talk) 00:04, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: let's end this pitiful state

message: Hi!
i am done with the text. I put a translate tag on top here. For now i simply copied the refs, which are not ideal - i see what i can find to replace them. 
PLEASE - check the translation and CORRECT!
ATB
Wikirictor (talk) 07:21, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Refs

message: i suggest this section - although i simply copied it from Neanderthal's head section - because many of the genome project's samples were derived from Neanderthal 1. Additionally it deals with open topics of the above section (excavations of 1997 and 2000). Please correct me, if i am wrong. Thanks
ATB
Wikirictor (talk) 16:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: last section (relation to modern humans)

message: Please see the Discussion page for File:Neanderthal position.png at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Neanderthal_position.png#Usefulness on Wikimedia Commons.--Frans Fowler (talk) 00:01, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usefulness of the Location Map
Talk:WSX Championship

message: The show just debuted on MTV,should people already be spoiled with the history before it even televises it's first show?Linknumbers 04:41, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Should we count title changes before they're even televised?

message: I grabbed a screencap of the belt and put it up.  Linknumbers 04:41, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wonder if anybody can find a better pic of the belt? Jeff Silvers 13:52, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: If this show is indeed canceled, we should probably go ahead and list Ricky Banderas in the title history since the episode wherein he wins the title will never air.  Of course, we should wait until there's some actual confirmation of the show's cancellation, but once that occurs, we need to add him. Jeff Silvers 13:48, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  If this show is actually canceled 
Talk:William Talman (actor)

message: In the Bio box, he's listed as having 5 children; 1 with his first wife, and 2 each with his second and third wives.  In the Anti-smoking advocacy and death section however, he is quoted as saying "Before I die, I want to do what I can to leave a world free of cancer for my six children... ". One child is unaccounted for in the Bio box.  Racwp (talk) 15:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction on page 

message: I removed the following from the part of his arrest: "of any immoral conduct"  This quote is the rest of the relevant sentence in citation #6 and should be included for clarity, since being naked in a private home cannot possibly be a crime. The bold and italic emphasis is as it was in the article. This violates Wikipedia's rule on neutral POV as it's less an attempt to clarify something as it is more of an editorial comment. It is also factually inaccurate.
__209.179.101.75 (talk) 01:53, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  My edit of 18 Oct 2014 

message: Talman (Emmett Myers) was described as having "his right eyelid partially paralyzed" on a radio broadcast. It seems true. In his many appearances on "Perry Mason" I have noticed something funny about his right eye. Did he get that in WWII, or was he born with it, or what? It's just like a genius like Ida Lupino to write that into the script, anyway. Wastrel Way (talk) Eric Wastrel Way (talk) 01:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  In "The Hitch-Hiker" ...
Talk:Plummer Terrier

message: "While the Plummer Terrier generally breeds true in appearance, the standard is a working terrier standard. The most common serious health fault in this breed is cleft palate, followed by foul mouth, patella luxation and cryptorchidism."
Exactly what is "foul mouth" ? Is it just halitosis, a misalignment of teeth, or a tendency to swear? I added links to cryptorchidsm and patella luxation, as I really didn't know what those were. Although I assume "foul mouth" is just bad breath, possibly caused by some genetic oral issue in these dogs. I really can't be certain; maybe "foul mouth" is a special term in dog breeding circles?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by OwlParty (talk • contribs) 03:01, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Future/Health Issues
Talk:Mantaur

message: I removed some wording suggesting the notability of these two jobbers, as well as generalized their professions. A Google search for Howard finds a featherweight boxer (not super-middleweight) by that name, who competed in the late 50s/early 60s. Googling Scott finds some references labeling him a "karate instructor" (and alleged child molestor), not a "martial arts expert". If references establishing notability and backing up former descriptions can be found and added, this sentence can be reverted. InedibleHulk (talk) 03:16, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leroy Howard and Gary Scott 

message: Crazy mf didn’t know him till he shows up at my door step with cops looking for some bitch we don’t even know. after searching our house and finding nothing but weed and swisher guts, they left our home. the stalking didn’t stop after that though. what a great surprise it was to find out this boi mikey over here was a wrestler though. Billyeditz (talk) 05:03, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there some reason you're telling this story here? InedibleHulk (talk) 10:36, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cancelled
Talk:Fli4l

message: I'm flagging this article NPOV and advert for, among others, the following:
*The distribution is particularly notable
*However, despite its age, the most recent release is very suitable for a basic firewall system, and remains customizable by its nature
*extensive usage of second person and lack of encyclopedic distance both to the subject and the reader in general
*overzealous list of features/advantages
Apart from that, general improvements of language appear necessary as well.
68.184.213.180 (talk) 21:53, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagging

message: I removed the proposed deletion notification because this article is in the process of being rewritten based upon the german original article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.101.238.172 (talk) 13:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That is fine, but it still doesn't have any references that show that the subject is notable. I'll wait until you are done and then we can re-assess whether it should be sent to WP:AFD. Is a week enough time to finish your work on it? - Ahunt (talk) 14:05, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. I thought, I could do it on short notice but something came in between. I'll need more than a week. --Ajv39 (talk) 14:41, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem, I'll check back at the end of the month then. - Ahunt (talk) 15:00, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed PROD

message: Ahunt wrote (see History): usually called "further reading" on Wikipedia, fixed. It is not clear that this book even mentions this subject however, needs a review
:*Thanks for fixing.
:*A preview of the book including a complete contents listing is here: Preview PC-Netzwerke. The subject is in the book from the first edition on. - Ajv39 (talk) 15:11, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay I see that. I'd like to suggest then that given that we know what it says that the book should be used as a ref, rather than "further reading" as it strengthens the argument that the topic is notable. - Ahunt (talk) 15:15, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: [x] done - Ajv39 (talk) 20:09, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Super. I think we have the bare minimum to argue WP:N now. I'll see what else I can find. - Ahunt (talk) 13:20, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a couple of refs, more for would helpful, though. - Ahunt (talk) 15:31, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks a lot! I added some references too from the German magazine c't (Editor Heinz Heise). There should certainly exist more useful refs (Google has 617000 hits on "fli4l"). - Ajv39 (talk) 21:10, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I found lots of hits as well and it is a unique name, but, of course most turn out to be blogs, spam, forums and other not-very-useful results. It is always a matter of finding the wheat in the chaff. - Ahunt (talk) 22:02, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Book
Talk:Bulkeley Bridge

message: The Conn-DOT page here says that the bridge was completed in 1907. However, websites here & here say the bridge was completed in 1908. I'm not sure where the 1906 date given in the article comes from, but since the sources say that construction began in 1903, perhaps 1906 is the date the bridge opened to traffic, even before it was completed? Anyone know for sure? --Elipongo 00:10, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The 1906 date is from the National Bridge Inventory. The structure number is 00980A. --Polaron | Talk 02:00, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've got the different dates figured out now. It says here that the arches were completed in 1906. Here it points out that the bridge was opened for traffic in December of 1907 and that there was a dedication celebration and ceremony in October of 1908. I'll be working this information into the article soon. --Elipongo (Talk|contribs) 06:44, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening Date 

message: I went over this bridge today after getting images of four crossings south of here.  Getting images of this bridge is going to be tough.  There's a plaque on the bridge too, which may be impossible to get.  Any suggestions? Denimadept 03:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It wasn't as tough as I thought it'd be.  Posting soon. Denimadept 21:04, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getting pictures 

message: The subject of Ms Fox - is somewhat urban-legendish + definitely needs some sources. 
While I was digging about on the subject, I came upon the following: https://www.courant.com/courant-250/moments-in-history/hc-250-g-fox-highway-construction-20140723-story.html which is somewhat interesting. The Courant confirmst Ms Fox - definitely was involved in the discussions due to her standing in the community. Her being the decisionmaker in the routing of traffic from the bridge, however, is most likely incorrect. There is some conflict on whether the interstate was used as a bargaining chip between Ms Fox and planners ... or whether there were some community-related motivations for the choice.
The article, though, makes it appear as if she had strong influence/sway on the decision rather than final decisionmaking power.
Summary - That Ms Fox made the decision herself ... is not correct information.
Kyanwan (talk) 03:50, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beatrice Auerbach Fox
Talk:Leprechaun: Back 2 tha Hood

message: That last bit of Trivia is irrelevent and original research, who cares if 6 doesn't show up anywhere or they aren't in In Universe Chronological Order. Perhaps we view them as stories told from someone much after the fact, a story teller in the 2300s or something. Who cares?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 08:58, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: " Plot" in this article has one word."sex"Vandalism.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.142.162.252 (talk) 20:58, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism?
Talk:Villefranche-de-Rouergue uprising

message: This article makes little to no sense. It really needs to mention what actually happened and establish some kind of narrative. What was the "tragic fate"?
I've never heard of this before, so would who ever created it like to fill in the gaps?
:I beleive it is speaking of the 13.SS Mountain Division 'handschar', which was the only Waffen SS division to mutiny.  Not sure it should count as a battle though, according to the son of the divisional commander (not the defector) the division was infiltrated by Communists before it left the Balkans. user:Pzg Ratzinger
::Found this site , which appears to confirm the event. Also looks as if there's been a cut-and-paste job, so a rewrite will be needed before someone deletes it. BTW, please sign all contributions, as mentioned on the header, above. See 13th Waffen Mountain Division of the SS Handschar (1st Croatian): I suggest a merge. Folks at 137 23:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Musix GNU+Linux

message: The last sentence of the second paragraph uses the word "distribute" a bit too much.  And now Distribute doesn't sound like a word anymore.
Is there any chance someone could word this a little differently? ZappyGun (talk) 13:21, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: the post above asks others to do what could easily have been done by the poster. is there any chance someone could comply with the poster's wishes?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.110.223 (talk) 13:22, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distributed from a distribution site that distributes...  Wait, what?
Talk:My Life (film)

message: Was inspired by this film into research that has benefitted many, but is not as recognized in medicinal fields, and at the same time, is comprehensive enough to be used, along with medicines for comprehensive results that can be accounted for in measurement. Pharmer in the Dell *)75.201.61.114 (talk) 18:59, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stargates
Talk:Political Affairs (magazine)

message: I simply think that this article reads too much like an advert for the current incarnation of this publication, and that is enough to warrant the NPOV tag.
--Smallbone10 00:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

message: According to this article in People's World, there is an archive of all the past published articles in Political Affairs. Unfortunately, the link to said archive appears to be dead. Is there any way to recover it or find an archive somewhere else?--Somenolife (talk) 03:39, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archives? 
Talk:Romeo Is Bleeding

message: Really? I would like to see a real source on that. The reference merely goes to a NY Times announcement of the DVD release! --213.130.255.33 (talk) 12:52, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: My crew and I went to see it in the theater.   17 years later, we still agree it's the 'Citizen Kane' of the 90s.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.67.104.4 (talk) 16:54, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cult following?
Talk:Silicon microstructures inc

message: SMI is part of an international business corporation (Elmos, as linked in the article), which is operating worldwide and continues expanding. SMI is also known here in Germany, playing a considerable role in Europe's automotive business. This should satisfy importance criteria. The company should appear in English WP rather than in German due to its location and its operating language. Therefore I am requesting the admins to accept it permanently. Also, I recommend to move the article to capitalized Silicon Microstructures Inc, since it is a proper name. Thanks -- Helle66 00:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance 

message: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_go1900/is_200410/ai_n7330512
http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/summary_0199-2340026_ITM
Not sure if this adds anything to the discussion.
INULL 05:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hm
Talk:Asadora

message: Reading this page I sensed that these might be similar to "Soap Operas", however there is no mention of that term. It would be helpful to me, and presumably to other readers, if there were either a statement saying that this is a similar phenomenon, or a clarification contrasting the two genres. --This statement was unsigned by User:69.180.201.215
:Two things. First, the term "soap opera" is not clearly defined to the level where all viewers will watch a given show and say, "Yes, this is a soap opera." Look at the debate within the Korean drama community; there's a division between people who call Kdramas soaps and those who don't want their dramas compared to something like General Hospital. Therefore, we can't say in this article whether or not an asadora is a soap opera or write in any other text that will finite the style and genre without actually citing reliable sources. That would clearly cause a debate. Along the same line, asadora is not porn and it isn't a documentary, but we're not going to write that into the article either. It isn't encyclopedic to include things in the "not" category. Another thing, asadora is no different than a Japanese dorama, so you should look to that article for style and genre information, and apply those ideas to asadora. The only difference between a prime-time dorama and an asadora is simply 1) the time slots, and 2) the length - both which are defined in the asadora article. Groink 00:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unanswered Questions 

message: Does "noted series" means "notable series"? If so, why are these ones so notable? It just seems like the most recent ones, plus one from the '80s. If it just means "series that are noted here," it's an incomplete list that doesn't even reference all of the ones in between. Can someone add prose to clean up the section? Douggers (talk) 13:11, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Noted series
Talk:Inline figure skating

message: I've tried straightening this out, but perhaps it is better merged into Artistic roller skating? -- ArglebargleIV 00:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know. It seems quite a different "sport" ... and on the Dutch wikipedia, User:Hsf-toshiba objected to the addition of inline skating in the "Artistic roller skating" (:nl:Kunstrijden) article, as it are different sports, and inline skating isn't governed by the same national federation, etc etc (the advertising and spamming style of the inline skating authors didn't help either). I think you did a great job straightening out this article, and it's fine as a good seperate wikipedia article now :-) --LimoWreck 00:37, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In the US, at least, inline figure skating is indeed governed by the same national federation as the quad artistic skaters. For that matter, FIRS governs it as well. There are other organizations that have been formed, but that's the one recognized by the IOC. The EIFSA organization linked from this page doesn't have any official status. I personally think this qualifies to be its own page (and could be expanded), but the federation reason isn't the basis for this. ManekiNeko | Talk 02:56, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: It took me quite a while to figure out where to look for inline figure skates. So I feel it may be helpful to include them here to make other people's life easier in finding these skates. I am not associated with any of them and do not intend this for commercial purpose. It is not among the more popular kinds of sports. The availability of information is relatively low from my perspective. Also, I found online that PICSKATE is closer to ice figure and Snow White is closer to quad figure. XG (talk) 04:03, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  some skates manufacturer links added
Talk:Rocks Cluster Distribution

message: The Rocks Cluster distribution is an open source non-commercial Linux distribution that has been around since 2000.  It is a notable on its own right, as can be seen by the Google test (1,950,000 hits).  Although it is not generally used by end users for personal desktop installations, its used in cluster server farms and in the grid computing space is relatively prominent.  Constructive suggestions for specific improvements to this stub article are welcome. -- Bovineone 00:01, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion nomination

message: I'd hate to see this page go. We know that "cloud computing" got a major boost in popularity towards the end of 2007, with Google and Amazon vying for the top spot in "elastic computing". Eucalyptus, a project of UC Santa Barbara, just released their product aimed at delivering a real, usable open source cloud computing environment based on Xen and Rocks is the most preferable way to deploy the environment.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.42.208.182 (talk) 20:11, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Eucalyptus Cloud Computing