Talk:No Platform

message: Is there any source for organisations that are subject to no platform policy?Asifkhanj (talk) 10:41, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Source for current list

message: The original author appears to disapprove of the policy. This article requires input on the history and reasons for the policy, for purely encyclopedic reasons as well as "balance". LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:19, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  re NPOV template 

message: This is the most biased and poorly written article I have read in a long time. This clearly contravenes the aim of wikipedia. There is already a neutral article about No Platform. This was obviously written by the shameless author to support the anti-no platform stance and thus give it false credibility.
:You seem so passionate about it yet you didn't sign your post? Hmmmm... Atraxus 01:12, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  re Article 

message: I just learned about this phrase from This 2014 New Statesman article. If there was anyone left who could merge this back into a better ref'dm NPOV "No Platform" article (which currently redirects here, it would be great. I'm not going to do anything and unwatching this page. But just a thought. Carolmooredc  (Talkie-Talkie) 01:32, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Updating and "No Platform" article

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on NUS No Platform Policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140930131642/http://www.nusconnect.org.uk/pageassets/about/minutes/necminutes/NEC_210512_PapersV2.pdf to http://www.nusconnect.org.uk/pageassets/about/minutes/necminutes/NEC_210512_PapersV2.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:42, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on NUS No Platform Policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20160105032545/http://www.nusconnect.org.uk/pageassets/about/democraticprocess/NUS_Articles_Rules_Aug12.pdf to http://www.nusconnect.org.uk/pageassets/about/democraticprocess/NUS_Articles_Rules_Aug12.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131228085743/http://www.nusconnect.org.uk/pageassets/about/policy/LGBT_2012.pdf to http://www.nusconnect.org.uk/pageassets/about/policy/LGBT_2012.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:42, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on NUS No Platform Policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.dur.ac.uk/vm.jcr/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1561&Itemid=496
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:24, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: So the lede states this is a policy of the NUS and then in it's final sentence states "The policy does not extend to students' unions who are part of NUS..." I've no idea what information this is trying to convey, is it or isn't a policy of the NUS, since I'd say a policy which doesn't extend to anyone isn't actually a policy. --86.5.93.103 (talk) 09:32, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing 

message: The latter half of this is about a film not being shown which was on the basis of political imbalance due to being near to an election. This seems to have nothing to do with "no platform" unless the individual or the tory party are "proscribed" which I don't believe is the case. Surely this is something completely different to "no platform". --86.5.93.103 (talk) 09:41, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  How the policy works 

message: Hi,
Proposal is we merge no platform into deplatforming.
Deplatforming talk page is marked as controversial so I have copied all users who have edited/talked  deplatforming or "no platform"
 
Google scholar and search results.
("deplatforming" or "deplatform")  AND (university OR College) - google scholar 91 search 16200
("deplatforming" or "deplatform")  search 5540
("no platforming" or "no platform")  AND (university OR College) Scholar 151 Search 4680 (1260 UK)
("no platforming" or "no platform")  search 13200 BUT 
the phrase "No platform" is used often with railways, construction, games, and computing. It is also used in the sense of a party having no political platform in an election - people can still listen but the politicians have nothing to say. 
Google Trends show no platforming decreasing and deplatforming increasing.
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=no%20platforming,deplatforming
User:Abedecian  User:Alan_Liefting User:Alekksandr  User:Altzinn Asifkhanj  User:Bensin  User:Bobfrombrockley  Carolmooredc User:Chessrat  User:Closeapple  User:DanielRigal  User:David_Gerard  User:Davide_King  User:DavidJ710  User:Derek_R_BUllamore  User:Dewritech  User:Dr_Gangrene  User:Enginear  [[User:EveredUx  User:GCarty   Atraxus User:George100  [[User:GUi_le_Roi  User:IceKarma  User:JamesAM  User:JamesR  User:Jayjg  User:Joe_Roe  User:John_wiki  User:Jprg1966  User:Koavf  User:LessHeard_vanU  User:LilHelpa  User:Lopifalko  User:Lwarrenwiki  User:Magioladitis  User:Mahahahaneapneap  User:Mannanan51  User:Marcocapelle  User:MarioGom  [[User:MaUls User:Mathglot User:Maximillion_PegasUs  User:Metamagician3000  User:Neutrality User:Nizolan User:Nealmcb User:Philip Cross User:Philip_TrUeman  User:Qwfp  [[User:Rich_FarmbroUgh  User:RichardLyons74  User:RJFJR  User:RjwilmsiBot User:Rodw  User:Sceptre  User:SkyWarrior  User:SmackBot  User:SpanishSnake  User:TFOWR  User:Timrollpickering  User:Wegesrand  User:Wolfdog User:Zezen User:ZfJames   Wakelamp d[@-@]b (talk) 12:45, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with deplatforming