Talk:Craig D. Idso

message: On several pages dealing with people that hold contrary views on global warming, the writers (I'm not sure who) link to Exxon Secrets as though they are a reliable and unbiased source. I think that this is inappropriate behavior. It would be more appropriate to say that such things have been suggested or said about them, but this is clearly taking sides. That is not appropriate. I request that this be either removed or linked to as an example of criticism, but not objective fact. I expect better from you as an online encyclopedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.110.134.134 (talk) 23:32, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Funding Thing 

message: The disclaimer that "Idso has been accused of receiving funding from ExxonMobil" is innuendo. Every scientist receives funds from some source. Most climate scienticst in the UN Climate Panel, I belive, are mostly sponsored by governments. So should'n every Wikipedia article on scientists paid by governments, say that they are accused of receiving funds for politicians and government. I'm willing to put up a web site accusing every one of them of receiving funds from the government, if that's what it takes to get some justice here. Clearly, what this disclaimer is, is a piece of ideologically based innuendo, false ideology, as marxists would put it, that government paid scientist are pure, and that scientists that have received funding from non-governmental corporations are dirty. Another ideology says that it's power that corrupts. Should Wikipedia subscribe to any of those ideologies? So either this disclaimer should apply to all funded scientist, or they should apply to no one.--85.165.64.30 (talk) 13:02, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Innuendo is exactly what it is, and it breaches Wikipedia policy to slander people in living biographies.Alex Harvey (talk) 11:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Bias, bias, bias by WP...      Here we go again with the WP pro AGW position.  Let's have the very first paragraph in the Global Warming page site how many hundreds of millions in funding the IPCC pro AGW contibutors recieved to do thier studies. I'm so sick of these eco freak AGW editors on this site !!! 68.56.175.27 (talk) 00:35, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

text: FYI - Looks like there's new attempts to slander/innuendo on this point again. I just did an undo, I don't plan on babysitting it. Theosis4u (talk) 01:14, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Accused of of receiving funding from ExxonMobil" 

message: I note that we have an editor claiming to be the subject of this article and saying in an edit summary "our organization does not receive funding from ExxonMobil. This is false." 
However we also have Exxon-Mobil's own public disclosures, such as this one from the ExxonMobil 2006 Worldwide Giving Report, in which Exxon Mobil lists the Center as a recipient of significant donations from Exxon-Mobil Corporation.  Harvard Professor Dr. James McCarthy also used this disclosure in his evidence before the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight of the House Science Committee.  .
In the circumstances, a denial by the recipient carries little weight.  --TS 01:56, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Exxon-Mobil public disclosures support the claim

message: Can we add this photo of him? A quick google image search showed this image is widely distributed 
http://cloud.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Idso-Craig.gif Gise-354x (talk) 22:12, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo of Craig 

message: Section = 109 BLP articles labelled "Climate Change Deniers" all at once. This article was placed in a "climate change deniers" category. After discussion on WP:BLPN and WP:CFD the category was deleted. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 16:44, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: BLP noticeboard

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Craig D. Idso. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120104165110/http://www.nipccreport.org/reports/2009/2009report.html to http://www.nipccreport.org/reports/2009/2009report.html
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130129014955/http://multi-science.metapress.com/content/e23g446528875r35/ to http://multi-science.metapress.com/content/e23g446528875r35/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:17, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified