Talk:Clairvoyance

message: The article's picture is extremely unsettling and poor quality, I suggest a replacement.--Sığe |д=) 22:55, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creepy/poor picture 

message: A recent diff (among other things) changed the capitalization of section headers. It's my understanding that section headers follow MOS:HEAD and should be in sentence case. I'll fix these if there's no objection.
Some of these terms for other flavors of clairvoyance seem unlikely to me. "Clairofactus", for instance. Do more reliable sources exist than some devotee's website glossary?  —jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 23:46, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah, I undid that edit  – I have no opinion on or rs's for that specific terminology, though. Debouch (talk) 15:59, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  September 2016 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Clairvoyance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160314213256/http://archived.parapsych.org/historical_terms.html to http://parapsych.org/historical_terms.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160314213256/http://archived.parapsych.org/historical_terms.html to http://parapsych.org/historical_terms.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:23, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Would a "References in Pop Culture" section be an appropriate addition to this article? Kenneth Sweezy Talk to me..... Please? 23:56, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The term is also used figuratively to describe any keen insight in general.  Clinton Daylight Time (talk) 16:50, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  References in Pop Culture 

message: Although its name says , Rudolf Steiner's works show that it is anything but clear, and clairvoyants, even if we assume that it is not hallucination, may easily get lost in their own clairvoyant experiences.
 could you produce a quote to that extent from Steiner?
I don't suggest to call his point either true or false, just state the point he made according to WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV.
AFAIK, Steiner wrote something like . tgeorgescu (talk)  14:28, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oh, the irony 

message: I still hold the stance that claivoyance is hallucination. However, Rudolf Steiner understood its mechanisms. That's why various clairvoyants are able to agree upon the images induced by eurythmy.
My reasoning is the following: if clairvoyance, clairaudition, and so on, were giving deeper insights into natural phenomena, the vast majority of the Nobel Prizes would go to clairvoyants. Since this hasn't happened, they don't. The ordeal of mainstream science and mainstream scholarship is that Anthroposophy is full of pseudoscience and of pseudohistory. So full that most scientists and scholars don't take Anthroposophy seriously. While scholars of religion studies examine it, they are by no means bound to agree that it's true. tgeorgescu (talk)  23:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Later thoughts 

message: Clairaudience redirects to this page.  Yet this page does not mention 'Clairaudience', not even a single time.  Is this appropriate? Jamesdowallen (talk) 10:26, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Claircognizance too. See: Wiktionary:claircognizance. --Timeshifter (talk) 09:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clairaudience 

message: Why does this article fail to describe one of the most famous cases of clairvoyance in history, that of Emmanuel Swedenborg? Swedenborg was at Gothenburg when he saw a fire, many miles away near his home in Stockholm. He saw that it stopped just several houses away from his own house. When he was back in Stockholm, he found that a fire had happened, just as he had described it. Rollo August (talk) 21:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:CITE WP:RS to that effect. tgeorgescu (talk)  22:55, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing reference to Swedenborg

message: Was wondering which religious or other groups were being referred to by the pagans comments? Surely there must be other groups than just Christians referred to throughout the world? TykeLass (talk) 00:18, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pagan