lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:World riddle

message: 28-October-2006: I named the article with the lower-case "riddle" since the term appeared in many searched webpages as "world riddle" (lower-case).  Today, I have created several other WP synonymous terms stored as "#REDIRECT" to the "World riddle" article, since it is an unusual term known by several names:
::* "world-riddle" - as a hyphenated term;
::* "World Riddle" - mapped as upper-case "Riddle" to the article;
::* "Welträthsel" - as the German spelling with umlaut "a" + "th";
::* "Welträtsel" - as the German spelling with umlaut "a" + just a "t" (no "h");
::* "Weltraetsel" - as the German spelling with vowels "ae" + just a "t" (no "h");
::* "Riddle of the Universe" - English title of Haeckel's book, without "The"
Google had over 3,600 references to the "world riddle" as the English spelling, and Haeckel wrote about the term over 100 years ago, so there should be numerous other references, such as within books.  It is a famous term within philosophical debates.  -Wikid77 17:33, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: I have noticed several references to the "world riddle" in explaining the analysis of musical compositions, but haven't added details, yet.  -Wikid77 17:33, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music 

message: Please note that Haeckel does not refer to Nietzsche's view on world riddles, at least not at first place. Haeckel's major aim was to reject or solve Emil du Bois-Reymond's seven world-riddles, formulated in 1880. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emil_Du_Bois-Reymond
Maybe someone whose first language is English and who is more capable in editing wiki-sites than I am could correct this. Greetings from Germany.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.13.47.39 (talk) 12:22, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Did Nietzsche actually use the term in Also Sprach Z., or was that term derived by by Haeckel, et al.?  Nietzsche refers to [On or Of] the Vision and the Riddle, but I don't believe the term "World Riddle" (Welt Rätsel, Welträtsel, etc. ) is used. ~Eric F 74.60.29.141 (talk) 19:03, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nietzsche: "World Riddle"?
Talk:List of South Park children

message: Kevin's last name is not Chang and Craig's is not Nommel.  These names are purely speculative and inappropriate for an encyclopedia-style entry.
Who has deleted the Bill, Terrance and Fosse article? They have had many appearences and are recurring. By the way, what is it with people changing surnames and altering stuff that doesn't need it?
*Mr. Garrison
:I continue to delete them because it's non-factual information.  If you insist on giving them surnames and giving names to all the goth kids, then please cite a proper source.  I find it hard to believe that I've missed all this info for as many times as I've watched every episode.  Every credible site I go to has no listing of surnames for these characters.  Furthermore, www.spscriptorium.com shows no reference to names for the goth kids in their three appearances. Tweeks Coffee 03:43, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Upon further inspection, I found this FAQ, located at www.southparkstudios.com
Q. - I've heard from quite a few sources that Craig's last name is Nommel. True or false?
A. - Craig has never been given a last name on the show.
I can provide a link later, but if you just search that site's FAQ page for "Craig" it's the entry date 5/6/06 Tweeks Coffee 15:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

text: My apologies, clearly I had confused myself there.  The surname issue hasn't resurfaced for a while, it seems to be a mostly moot point now. Tweeks Coffee 21:12, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:DNV

message: The articles lacks of reliable and independent sources. More references should be added. (Onrop007 (talk) 22:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There has been major changes to DNV GL since the merger, e.g. pertaining to number of employees. Perhaps we could ask some employees to contribute with facts? Also, the headline must be changed; I don't think I can do this.Bjornte (talk) 08:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name & organizational change 
Talk:Diocese of Bjørgvin

message: I've added the new Bishop, but there is no CC image of her. I was also unsure if I should change Hordaland and Sogn og Fjordane to Vestland. In any case, someone with more experience updating such pages can look over it as well. Momsemann (talk) 12:36, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating the page
Talk:Diocese of Hamar

message: I don't think it's legitimate to directly equate the pre-Reformation Catholic diocese with the contemporary Lutheran diocese. Perhaps there should be a separate category under Catholic dioceses called "former dioceses" or something along those lines. --Leifern 20:59, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Will do. Yet another cognate. Benkenobi18 (talk) 09:06, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catholic diocese?
Talk:HCG 87

message: HCG 87 group of galaxies → HCG 87 — The words "group of galaxies" are redundant, as nothing else in astronomy or on Wikipedia is named "HCG 87".  Moreover, articles for astronomical objects with the object type in their articles' names (such as "Spiral Galaxy Messier 108") were moved to simplified names (such as "Merrier 108").  The same should be done for HCG 87. GeorgeJBendo 17:36, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Add  * Support  or  * Oppose  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
*Support for reasons given above. GeorgeJBendo 17:37, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: *There was no opposition, so I have moved the page. —Mets501 (talk) 16:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: I just removed a PROD tag for notability. I found five results in the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS), perhaps I can take a stab at demonstrating notability. Ifnord (talk) 03:13, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:BBC Knowledge (international)

message: This page should be updated with a logo and infobox and extra info on the channel BBC Knowledge --User:tamper911 8:01pm, 21 September 2007 (BST)
What about BBC Knowledge HD ? source: http://satkurier.pl/news/61090/bbc-knowledge-hd-oficjalnie-zapowiedziany-w-n.html   Akomor1 (talk) 22:37, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Attophysics

message: Hi, I'd completely leave out the following sentence because it has nothing to do with ATTOphysics. Seems that more than 50% of the article consists of the comparison with these techniques.
“High temporal resolution measurements were first demonstrated in novel experiments such as the famous photograph of a bullet penetrating an apple, or even Eadweard Muybridge's 19th century photo series which proved that horses hooves do leave the ground at a running pace.”
--PassPort (talk) 23:39, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes — done. Eric Drexler (talk) 19:23, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  unnecessary/misleading sentence
Talk:B − L

message: The article states that there are gauge bosons associated with B-L called X and Y. This is wrong. GUTs like SU(5) usually have X and Y bosons, but if we just gauge B-L we end up with one neutral gauge boson, in the literature denoted as Z' (Z-prime). The statement about neutrino mass is also questionable; the truth is, if B-L were exact, neutrinos would have to be Dirac particles, which is perfectly fine. Breaking B-L usually leads to Majorana neutrinos, but not always, as it depends on the B-L charge of the scalar field one uses to break the symmetry.
Someone should definitely rewrite the article, if I find the time I will do it in a couple of month.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 133.28.47.102 (talk) 03:29, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gauge bosons 

message: It should be clarified which is meant, global or local U(1) symmetry. These are different symmetries. Charge conservation is related to global U(1) symmetry, while gauge invariance is a local U(1) symmetry.
Aoosten (talk) 21:18, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  global/gauge U(1) symmetry 

message: A newly published article claims to prove that B-L is not possible as a symmetry under AdS/CFT:
https://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.191601  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TricksterWolf (talk • contribs) 20:05, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Violated in AdS/CFT
Talk:List of Triumph motorcycles

message: Triumph made a small engine model between 1914 - 1925. The LW (Light Weight) was Triumph's first venture into two stroke engines. 12000 machines were produced, 9000 21/4Hp up to 1923 & 3000 21/2Hp.
Manufactured between 1913 and 1926, the Model LW - Light Weight - was a new direction for Triumph and may well have been born of an idea by Seigfried Bettmann’s partner, Mauritz Schulte. Schulte’s three daughters often enjoyed rides seated behind Works Testers, and the story is that Schulte took the first Model LW home for his daughters. 146.200.47.92 (talk) 18:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unlisted model
Talk:Boskednan stone circle

message: The number of stones remaining is 11 rather than 10 - I have photographs dating from 2011 that prove this. I know that the cows now roaming the 9 Maidens Common have damaged the stone circle, but they haven't removed any of the stones!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teleprinter Sleuth (talk • contribs) 00:24, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Drottningborg

message: More content needed to avoid deletion. Dahliarose 20:57, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

message: The Norwegian articles have more inf about it. I'm not convinced it's worth an independent article, but there is certainly enough there to make a paragraph either at:Grimstad or at Norwegian Lutheran Mission, to which this can then redirect. I can do this, but not immediately. HeartofaDog (talk) 00:20, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed PROD
Talk:Baryonic dark matter

message: The article asserts that brown dwarves are "balls of hydrogen and helium with masses < 0.08M_\odot".  Okay, fine, but what the heck is a M_\odot?  Megagram? Moon's mass?  Some other (presumably large) amount of mass? Nibios (talk) 14:52, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Only half a decade late, but correct, that is the standard symbol for a solar mass. I've clarified. —Alex (Ashill | talk | contribs) 14:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What unit is this? 

message: Black holes should not be considered baryonic dark matter.  There is no difference between a black hole made from WIMPs and a black hole made from hydrogen atoms.
Zakbas (talk) 18:53, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is a black hole baryonic?
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Bobabobabo

message: User:Bobabobabo
Category:	7
Image:	378
Mainspace	1057
Talk:	21
Template talk:	3
Template:	21
User talk:	185
User:	107
Wikipedia talk:	2
Wikipedia:	23
avg edits per article	2.62
earliest	19:46, 12 May 2006
number of unique articles	689
total	1804
Bobabobabo's editcount summary stats as of 17:45, October 28 2006, using wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 17:47, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Beam emittance

message: I don't believe the formula for the emittance is correct. It's a naive approximation that leaves out correlations in the 4 dimensions of transverse emittance.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.107.13.185 (talk) 15:51, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like the 4D emittances are included in the article as of 2022. The 2D emittances are also fairly important for application when the beam doesn't have correlation. ElectronsNStuff (talk) 18:25, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Emittance and Projections of Emittance

message: If conservation of emittance means that just as much rays enters as leaves then I don't think lenses can apply. --Nabo0o (talk) 18:32, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really sure what you mean; conservation of emittance with quadrupoles (lenses) acting on the beam is pretty much the reason why it is useful. This article would be helped significantly by having a phase space ellipse (or a couple showing different beams). If someone has the time please make one! Cambion (talk) 10:27, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ops. Sorry I got something mixed up there ..... I was thinking more in terms of radiation intensity than the actual number of rays--Nabo0o (talk) 18:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: About the conservation of emittance

message: I think the article is pretty confusing. It seems to mix optics of light and "optics" of particle accelerators. Personally I've never used 'brightness' in a particle beam - only luminosity which is a more useful metric. However, I see how it makes sense in some respects. I suppose when I did all this we just pretended the particles in a bunch don't affect each other so including how many particles there are is just not relevant. Cambion (talk) 19:34, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion 

message: The article states emittance has dimensions of length or length*angle, which makes sense once you remember angle is dimensionless.  (I had to look up to make sure angle is dimensionless.)  Should we state that angle is dimensionless to make this clearer?  RJFJR (talk) 19:52, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: We should rather speak about the fact that we use very often a "small angle" approximation and blend angles and slopes ;) 77.197.180.90 (talk) 17:39, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Do we need to state that angle is dimensionless?

message: I started adding detail on emittance measurement technique. Not sure if it will be warranted to break them off into their own article soon, or if leaving them here is more appropriate. ElectronsNStuff (talk) 18:27, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Emittance Measurement
Talk:Belle experiment

message: Hello,
do everyone know what does mean Belle? Is it an acronym and if it is, what does mean every letter? Thanks. Pamputt (talk) 12:38, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does mean Belle? 

message: Article currently reads in part anticipated to start operation in 2018. Unless we can enlist the services of Dr Who this anticipation is on shaky grounds. (;-> Andrewa (talk) 17:11, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed
Talk:Betatron

message: It's been a while since I researched this, but it is my recollection that Steenbeck developed the theory but didn't get his device to work. I think his design had some issues. I recall it was like a standard power transformer with a rectangular core -- wires were wrapped around one side and the vacuum chamber was around the other. Dlenmn 22:18, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who developed the Betatron 

message: I commented on the subject article to bring attention to the following statement: 
 
§ "a Betatron was also used to provide electrons converted into neutrons" 
 
... which is nonsense. As I wrote, there is no process by which electrons are converted to neutrons. 
The weapon-test cited in the article clearly states (correctly) that the Betatron's electron-beam 
was used to generate high-energy X-rays (NOT NEUTRONS) which initiated fission. 
67.233.255.149 (talk) 09:13, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Betatron 

message: It says in the text that Michio Kaku tried to build a betatron while in High School. He only built a large electromagnet so I really don't think that it could count even as _trying_ to build a particle accelerator...
I tried to build a sun while in elementary school, but I only did the drawing :)
In other words, I really believe that it is totally irrelevant to mention the above in the text.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bjornebarn (talk • contribs) 08:59, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michio Kaku 

message: The articles says "Außerordentlichhochgeschwindigkeitelektronenentwickelndenschwerarbeitsbeigollitron",
which is not correctly copied from the source.
There, it is "Ausserordentlichhohegeschwindigkeitselektronenentwickeldenschwerarbeitsbeigollitron"
which also has a typo ("...entwickelden..." -> "...entwickelnder...").
If the sources has quoted from memory or from an oral discussion among colleagues, it probably missed
some spaces. The term
"Ausserordentlichhohegeschwindigkeitselektronen entwickelnder Schwerarbeitsbeigollitron" is easy to understand.
Perhaps someone with access to the source can find the 'friend' who suggested the name.
I hope we can solve this important matter.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:71:6F0C:D00:1109:B5E1:FCA7:DE1A (talk) 12:24, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The funny long name
Talk:Petrushka

message: I found this page redirecting to the talk page of the ballet for some reason. Could somebody investigate into this matter? My common sense told me to remove the redirect. Thank you. 64.231.82.53 (talk) 23:59, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: The article both states that Petrushka was known as early as in the 17th century, yet later follows that Pietro-Mira Pedrillo could have been the prototype.--Adûnâi (talk) 06:40, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency 

message: — Assignment last updated by Zipperbrown (talk) 15:43, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Art Librarianship
Talk:Raze's Hell

message: I completely disagree. While the article may be uncyclopedic at present, that's can be fixed. I also think that it's a little extreme to say that it's unnotable. That said, I'm going to start working on the article and hopefully I can bring it to a point that qualifies it for remaining in Wikipedia. Anyone else who wants to contribute to it, go right ahead.
:Okay, I've rewritten the article and expanded it. Insane99 18:22, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion Proposal

message: Hello! I not only own Raze's Hell but I have beaten it. Thus I have updated this article with all the information I have gotten from the game. There are spoiler tags in the appropriate places too.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.162.8 (talk) 03:43, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New Information
Talk:Back at the Barnyard

message: NOOOOO!!
I loved this show, and now it's ruined!  I need to know if this is just vandalism, after all, the person had no citation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.97.36.226 (talk) 17:36, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anime 

message: Is there any website that prooves that this actually exists?
Narfbite 17:55, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: seem to mention this. Although this is somewhat crystal balling which should be avoided. Weregerbil 12:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's on the Barnyard DVD for fall 2007.   91  BOY | talk  22:01, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Existince 

message: Is it OK to move this article to Barnyard: The Series?   91  BOY | talk  22:39, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move page 

message: The series isnt Back at the barnyard, its Back TO the barnyard! It said so in an issue of Nick magazine.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.176.130.15 (talk) 17:29, August 20, 2007 (UTC) 
nope your wrong it is back at the barnyard  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.197.5.190 (talk) 10:51, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong name

message: Isn't his name Eugene?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.214.203.72 (talk) 18:22, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Snotty Boy 

message: Shouldn't a controversy section been added? many parents don't like the fact that some of the cows are "male".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.109.74.182 (talk) 16:53, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy section? 

message: Stop removing my edit Killerboy29912 (talk) 05:15, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It's unsourced, it's not a minor edit, and I question whether we need to mention when a show aired in reruns on one particular channel. Meters (talk) 05:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

text: already answered this user elsewhere. Meters (talk) 19:49, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A dude that keeps on removing my edit 

message: Oct 17,2020 Has anyone noticed that the "plot" section of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Back_at_the_Barnyard is lifted entirely from the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_Tendency and has nothing to do with the Back at the Barnyard page? Is this an error or sabotage? Can it be reverted to a version that has to do with the subject at hand?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8800:2B80:1E3C:E8F6:80CB:7A8E:E8C5 (talk) 05:21, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong information currently in "plot" section
Talk:Wei Wu Wei

message: "The identity of Wei Wu Wei [...] was not revealed at the time of publication for reasons outlined in the Preface to the first book..."
Why are these reasons not explained? What are they? zaiken 20:56, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for Wei Wu Wei Pseudonym
Talk:National College of Music

message: This article is woolly in the extreme.
A small number of honorary fellowships are awarded each year to those who are considered to have made an outstanding contribution to the world of music or the arts. 
To whom? Who are the present holders and where and when did they receive their awards?
The BBC journalist Raphael Rowe, who was one of the M25 Three, has recently accepted an invitation to join the College's Advisory Council. It was felt that his presence would help to enable young people of all socio-economic backgrounds and creeds to realise their musical and artistic potential. 
Exactly how does a non-musician acheive this?
Recently an initiative has taken place in Birmingham, which offers opportunities for young people from less affluent areas in speech and drama. 
What initiative?
Where are the examination centres, and who are the examiners? How many people hold Associate and Licentiate diplomas?
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that deals in facts. At present this article reads more like an advertisement than an encyclopedia entry as it contains not a single verifiable fact, and the only link is to the college's own site.   ♦ Jongleur100 ♦ talk 09:04, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've deleted all the promotional text and provided a couple of references, although one of these is the NCM's own website. This really needs attention from someone with knowledge of this organisation's importance or otherwise.  The original editor seems to have been a SPA who is long gone.--Plad2 (talk) 17:06, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Talk:NBA 07

message: This page needs some major help!  The idea that Billy Joe Cuthbert bet merged here is absurd.  I am removing the proposal.  Andrew 18:43, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is it absurd? It really should be discussed before having it removed. I am adding it back on pending a resolution. You have not resolved it. --Downwards 00:21, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Farmand

message: Intersting definition: A farmand (or farmann) was a Norse tradesman. If the norse tradesman never went out of his village (but still trading) was he then a farmand? 
I believe that this is not a very scientific definition. During this time, the word kaupferðum was much more a tradesman. Dan Koehl (talk) 01:07, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition