lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Josip Plemelj

message: I've made a start on cleanup, as requested by the cleanup tag.
The corresponding article on fr.wiki is a nice target, which was based on this one, but is a lot more streamlined and flows rather better.
Still more to do, if anyone wants to take this up.  Jheald (talk) 11:52, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: I'm writing regarding copyright issue about Plemelj's geometrical constructions. I just inform here that whole quotations are my linear literal translations from Slovene source, which is given. At the time of writing that, I think Wikipedia did not have such restrictions. First about the source. It was published (first in Slovenia) in the OMF 1992, and as it is noted there – that was a publication in unchanged form of Plemelj's talk, which he gave in 1949 at 1st Congress of Yugoslav Societies of Mathematicians, Physicists and Astronomers in Bled. Text was firstly published, as it is mentioned by source investigation, in 1951 in Belgrade [Prvi kongres matematičara i fizičara FNRJ - Naučna saopštenja i obavještenja 1951, 1–6]. If you think that the whole text is just a speech Plemelj gave at this congress, and do you think that text that was translated (not the whole of course) is really an example of extensive quotation and that "the quote is too lengthy for current copyright policies". My opinion is that it is not, although it take really 3 pages on 170 × 238 mm format at the OMF. I also think that current solution was a bit 'harsh'. So what it is to be done? Together with a whole text also accompanying diagrams were removed from article. All three diagrams are original works from me, based on printed diagrams – is redrawing such diagrams also a copyright issue? My propose is this: to return/restore (at least in suitable form) meaning of quotations, and (at least one) of mentioned diagrams (which might also be turned from original GIF to SVG format btw). Would that be all right? I plan also to add some material regarding his constructions of regular heptagon, according to his and Hladnik's report(s). --xJaM (talk) 17:16, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plemelj's geometrical constructions
Talk:Bean

message: The first sentence of the last paragraph of the Nutrients section (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bean#Nutrients) states: 
"The Canadian government recommends that adults have up to two (female), and three (male) servings."
It should state: 
"The Canadian government recommends that adults have up to two (female), or three (male) servings of meat and alternatives per day."
Not only are numbers of recommended servings useless without a timeframe, but this is ambiguously worded in a way that makes it appear the Canadian gov't recommends eating up to three servings a day of just beans, when in reality they recommend meat and alternatives such as beans. This can be confirmed by viewing citation 31 (https://web.archive.org/web/20170530233136/http://hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/food-guide-aliment/choose-choix/meat-viande/need-besoin-eng.php). Foxtrot7azv (talk) 02:31, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The previous content in the nutrition section was for baked beans - a separate article for a unique preparation of cooked, canned beans. I replaced it with nutrition information for raw green beans, with this edit. With numerous edible bean species and cultivars, prepared as food by various methods, we need a basis for evaluating bean nutrition, for which the simplest presentation is raw green beans. Comments? Zefr (talk) 18:23, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 December 2022 

message: Is it possible to add that archaeological studies show that beans were consumed ~15,000 years ago in Huaca Prieta, Peru?
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.1602778 
Also in Caral ~3,000 BC. 
https://cdsa.aacademica.org/000-066/938.pdf
Milamianno22 (talk) 01:39, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request: evidence of earlier human consumption of beans in South America 

message: negligble = negligible 2603:8000:D300:3650:4C1D:B062:2D04:9F66 (talk) 06:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Thanks for the alert. HiLo48 (talk) 06:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 2 September 2023 

message: Change reference for "Currently, the world gene banks hold about 40,000 bean varieties, although only a fraction are mass-produced for regular consumption.[18]" (Number 18) to https://www.seedvault.no/about/the-seeds/ (the offical website for the Svalbard Global Seed Vault), or add it as an additional reference as the one currently used is a third party source (that is, the USDA) and the link is dead (not dead link: https://agresearchmag.ars.usda.gov/AR/archive/2006/Jun/viral0606.pdf or https://agresearchmag.ars.usda.gov/2006/jun/viral/)
Also add a greater than sign (>) directly before the 40,000 figure (E.x. Currently, the world gene banks hold about >40,000 bean varieties, although only a fraction are mass-produced for regular consumption.[18])
Thank you, GlitchTime GlitchTime (talk) 18:17, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: and modified with this edit. Zefr (talk) 19:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 November 2023
Talk:Bruno of Querfurt

message: Bruno of Qurfurt in his work (Vita quinque fratrum eremitarum; Vita vel passio Benedicti et Iohannis socorumque suorom) does not mention Ahtum, but he relates his missionary work among the Black Magyars. Therefore I suggest the following wording: "Bruno tried to convert the Black Magyars, but they insisted on their faith." instead of "Bruno tried to convert Ahtum, Duke of Banat, who was an Orthodox. Bruno encountered strong opposition, including that of the Greek monks there." (Borsoka (talk) 20:13, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ahtum or Black Magyars 

message: I know him as St Boniface of Querfurt, and an alternative name given here is Boniface, but when you search for Boniface, he doesn't show up. Can someone knowledgeable about such things fix it so he can be searched as Boniface? (I'm not asking for the page to be re-named, merely the ability to search for the name I recognize, and we acknowledge on the page.) Thanks 155.213.224.59 (talk) 11:41, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Search request 

message: Why is his feast day in October? In many cases, it's tied to death dates, but that isn't the case here. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 14:18, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feast Day 
Talk:Babenberg

message: The mentioning of Adalbert of Prague is certainly wrong. Adalbert of Prague was a) not a Babenberg by a long shot (he was Czech) and b) Born around 50 years AFTER the Babenberg feud. However, in lieu of any better sources to make the section better I'm just going to note it here.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Karajanis (talk • contribs) 21:49, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adalbert of Prague 

message: Shouldn't this article be renamed into House of Babenberg in order to be in compliance with other royal houses such as House of Windsor and House of Bourbon, as well as the categories themselves? Gryffindor 08:49, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I urge caution.  Both of the other examples are currently reigning; in these cases the "House of .." is necessary for disambiguation purposes.  How important does a family have to be in order to be "House of ..."?  Is Hohenlohe important enough?  How about Rothschild or Hearne? Noel S McFerran 10:16, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

text: This is an important house, so I would support the renaming. Charles 16:14, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose. House of Windsor disambiguates from Windsor Castle, Windsor, Ontario usw. The dynasty here is clearly the primary usage; we don't even have an article on the eponymous castle, or the brook. Let's keep things simple, and avoid masking links. Septentrionalis 22:23, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For the rest, I propose condensing this discussion on Talk:Wittelsbach, where it seems to have started. Septentrionalis 22:27, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I revert and agree with Septentrionalis and Noel S McFerran. Gryffindor (talk) 18:50, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  rename article into House of Babenberg? 

message: What exactly is a "count of the march"? Is march somehow a reference to Austria? yougetsew  —Preceding undated comment added 03:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Count of the March"
Talk:WYSIAYG

message: I don't think this is worth a seperate encyclopedia article - instead, it should be integrated into the WYSIWYG article.  --Robert Merkel
:Although WYSIAYG as an abbreviation is obviously WYSIWYG inspired, it is an entirely different concept. It doesn't belong on the WYSIWYG page. This article needs an extensive rewrite, but not a merge or delete. Shinobu 21:53, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with WYSIWYG

message: Ties WYSIAYG to WYSIWYG. However any relation between the two terms is only historical, if existant at all. Whether something alows for WYSIWYG is an interface question. WYSIAYG is an entirely different issue about reusable styles and structured documents.
For example Word and Tex can both be used to create documents that do and don't suffer from WYSIAYG. One is WYSIWYG, the other is not.
In HTML CSS can be used, or not. Whether a WYSIWYG editor is used doesn't matter (in sofar as it supports CSS that is). If you don't use CSS, the document will suffer from WYSIAYG, whether you used a WYSIWYG editor or not. Shinobu 18:29, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: I've encountered two meanings of this word:
*The issue described in the WYSIWYG article.
*The issue described in this article.
Note that these issues are not the same. Shinobu 09:56, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning
Talk:Otto II, Holy Roman Emperor

message: 6/22/08:  Deleted the ==Notes== section for the following reasons:
1. It wasn't a footnote.  Neither was it the  it was formatted as.  It was, at best, an external link.
2. It linked to a page in Italian with no translation available: that's not appropriate for an English language wiki.
3. The linked page appears to be part of a brief overview of Italian history, generally sourced from 8 other histories of Italy.  The content page cite had no paragraph or sentence numbers, nor does the external page cite any specific references, making the material unverifiable.
4. My Latin is a bit rusty, but I'm pretty sure "Anni dal 983 al 1002" translates pretty close to "Years from 983 to 1002"; and "Il Periodo di Ottone III" is something like "The Life of Otto III".  Since the topic of the wiki article is "Otto II", who died in 983, I believe the Italian article is concerned with his son and (aside from it's other problems) would be more appropriate in Otto III's wikipage.
AnonTech (talk) 07:25, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted ==Notes==  

message: The titles are not capitalized accurately. 
Lexiga (talk) 06:18, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar and Titles 

message: It would be good to have a photo of his tomb for the article, if possible. Richard75 (talk) 15:29, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo of tomb 

message: I said in the discussion on this page that I would do a separate RM for Rudolf II and Joseph II. I did not clarify that I would only do that if there was consensus for this move, which there clearly is not. I will not be doing any such RM, as this RM, which was of a similar nature, was rejected by overwhelming consensus. UmbrellaTheLeef (talk) 16:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addendum on RM
Talk:City of London

message: Hi  Would you mind assessing why you deleted the documentary film > 
–How Britain's Bankers Made Billions From The End Of Empire, by Timeline - World History Documentaries, 1:16:20 min., published on 20 August 2019 on YouTube
″Timeline - World History Documentaries″ is ″the home of world history. Every week we'll be bringing you one-off documentaries and series from the world's top broadcasters, including the BBC, Channel 4, Discovery and PBS.″
–https://www.pbssocal.org/179-history-documentaries-you-can-watch-right-now-no-membership-required
The information I linked to is indeed not in violation of copyright and it does comply with our policies and guidelines. Should I consider using our upload template > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:YouTube ? 
Thank you.--87.170.192.136 (talk) 10:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It does not comply with our inclusion standards, and we do not link to everything that is related to a subject.  --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:52, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documentary film 

message: All the maps currently shown are sketchy. It is very difficult to work out where those sketches fit onto the topography, e.g. streets and rivers.
The initial location map as a small dot in the middle of Greater London is nigh on useless.  It should at least be zoomable in and out. Cvhorie (talk) 08:33, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. The Equalizer (talk) 16:20, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Street Map of London needed 

message: The City of London's role in illicit financial activity such as money laundering has earned the financial hub sobriquets like ‘The Laundromat’ and ‘Londongrad.’https://www.icaew.com/insights/viewpoints-on-the-news/2022/jun-2022/ec-londongrad-how-the-city-became-a-moneylaundering-haven 
London’s role as the world’s dirty money clearing house is well-documented but efforts are being made to clean up through legislation, e.g. authorizing  unexplained wealth orders. High-value properties are sought after by criminals and money launderers legitimising their gains by investing in the city’s prestigious real estate.https://www.worldfinance.com/banking/the-end-of-london-as-the-worlds-dirty-money-clearing-househttps://financialcrimeacademy.org/money-laundering-through-real-estate-in-uk/https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/11/opinion/pandora-papers-britain-london.html
In case of revert due to hurt feelings, see above.Oathed (talk) 12:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Money Laundering  

message: How can the form of government of the City of London be termed? --95.24.68.61 (talk) 19:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Form of government 

message: Who is editing these articles? They need to be fired. I've consistently seen that area for many cities globally are being misreported in wiki.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London 61.95.254.10 (talk) 11:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: If you don't believe something, check the citation. It says: Greater London 157,208ha; Inner London 31,930ha; City of London 290ha. --Cavrdg (talk) 12:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area of London 2.9 km2? wtf?
Talk:Venice

message: https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-solutions/2022/11/26/venice-floods-mose-barrier-climate/ Jo3sampl (talk) 14:54, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update on the MOSE anti-flooding project (in use) 

message: Thanks. Apokrif (talk) 19:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent text: 126 or 118 island?
Talk:Hijackers in the September 11 attacks

message: Why is there no mention of the involvement of members of Pakistan's Secret Service and Army?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/jul/22/usa.september11  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrLeonP (talk • contribs) 08:17, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Pakistan Connection 

message: I added... militant Islamist group al Qaeda. Militant Islam was the cause of the terrorist attack on 9/11. 2601:589:4801:5660:B1C7:7A45:9E90:1C31 (talk) 11:45, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Militant Islamist Group Al Qaeda Attacked On 9/11 

message: The second introductory paragraph now includes conspiracy theories about Hani Hanjour. Khatores (talk) 09:53, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleted unsourced conspiracy nonsense. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 10:39, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro paragraph includes conspiracy theories
Talk:Johann Mühlegg

message: Question: the article doesn't say when his naturalisation to Spanish citizenship occurred, and as a result it's not clear for which country he competed in 1999.  That's something we should clear up, if possible. -- Finlay McWalter 00:20, 19 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Right-O, done (a quick Google-search helped me out; I thought of this at my first edit, but such is one's sloth, y'know...)  I guess the guy technically could compete for Germany until the day of his Spanish naturalisation, although 1) he was by that time thoroughly p-o'ed at the German national team, and vice versa, and 2) practicalities of season would come into play. --Wernher 10:04, 19 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:12th century BC

message: In the wiki article concerning the 12th century BC (New Section) we find the following;
"1197 BC: Ramses III of Egypt repels attacks by northern invaders (the "Sea-Peoples")."
However Wikipedia also has an entry concerning Ram. III, which gives a differing view of his dates!  Should not someone make the corrections or offer a reason for the disconnections?69.92.23.64 (talk) 19:28, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real dates of Rameses III
Talk:History of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

message: By itself, it is "The Church of", but when something else is prefixed "the" is no longer the first word and orthographically it loses the capital. Anyone have a problem with me changing it? deisenbe (talk) 23:49, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I do. A big problem. The common name of the Church is "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints." So whenever referring to the full name thereof, "The" is always capitalized, per this policy, and this policy, among others. If there are references to what "the church" does in articles where the full name is not being used, then neither of the two words in such references should be capitalized. And all of that is further detailed in the relevant manual of style that Wikipedia uses for all such articles. If I am minsunderstanding your question, please feel free to clarify your question. Thanks. --Jgstokes (talk) 21:36, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capital on The in the title 

message: The title of this article, along with a provision at MOS:LDS, violates MOS:THEINST, a site-wide guideline which trumps WP:LOCALCONSENSUS. Please participate in the discussion at . Thanks. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:56, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title capitalization 

message: I've noticed many edits by brand new Wikipedia users lately. Is editing this article part of a student assignment? If so, it might be helpful to read the information at WP:Student assignments. Bahooka (talk) 19:14, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think this is part of a student assignment. Based on the automated tags on the edits, it looks like this page landed on the "Newcomer task: copyedit" list auto-generated by some algorithm. It likely happened when the "Tone" tag got added here. I am finding the signal-to-noise ratio on these edits to be extremely low. Removing the tag would probably get the article off that list, if the low SNR has become problematic. FAQ #2 at  might also indicate another route. --FyzixFighter (talk) 20:36, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

text: yeah, I don't think FAQ #2 would actually lead to anything useful unfortunately. Adding Template:No newcomer task might be the appropriate action, given the low SNR. Would anyone disagree with this template being added? --FyzixFighter (talk) 20:44, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @FyzixFighter, no objections here. User:Jgstokes (talk)—We can disagree without becoming disagreeable. 22:17, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @FyzixFighter, thanks for adding the template. Bahooka (talk) 06:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is editing this article part of a student assignment?
Talk:Optimizing compiler

message: "good compilers can often generate better code than human programmers" is a blatant POV. For one, my POV, as a person which way too often looks at assembly output of compilers, is opposite - even "good" compilers often produce visibly suboptimal code, whereas "mediocre" ones emit outright atrocious contraptions. 89.103.73.49 (talk) 16:34, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and have removed those POV statements. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 22:16, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV? humans

message: I think with a little review and touching up this article could become featured.
--24.239.174.223 22:50, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very good article 

message: I think the definition of compiler optimization can do with some work as its a little disjoint.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.173.82 (talk) 09:47, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition 

message: I've corrected the description of sparse conditional constant propagation (SCCP), which claimed that it's equivalent to iteration of constant propagation, constant folding, and dead-code elimination. In fact, it's more powerful, as the linked Wegman & Zadeck paper showsWegman, Mark N. and Zadeck, F. Kenneth. "Constant Propagation with Conditional Branches." ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 13(2), April 1991, pages 181-210.:
“Many optimizing compilers repeatedly execute constant propagation and unreachable code elimination since each provides information that improves the other. CC solves this problem in an elegant way by combining the two optimizations. Additionally, the algorithm gets better results than are possible by repeated applications of the separate algorithms, as described in Section 5.1.”
(CC is conditional constant propagation, which the authors made “sparse” using SSA.)
Essentially, what can happen is that value A is constant only because block B is dead, but B is dead only because A is constant. Since dataflow and control flow interact, analyzing them in isolation is less informative.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luke Maurer (talk • contribs) 02:18, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  SCCP is greater than the sum of its parts 

message: It's described as "[rearranging the] expression tree to minimize resources needed for expression evaluation"; is this referring to the Sethi–Ullman algorithm?  If so, whilst, as I remember from a paper I read a long time ago but have been unable to find, you can use that algorithm to generate code that reduces evaluation stack depth on stack machines, but it also can reduce the number of registers used on non-stack machines.  (Note that stack (computer science) points to  on the stack disambiguation page. Guy Harris (talk) 19:54, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  To what stack is "stack-height reduction" referring?
Talk:August Ferdinand Möbius

message: In think this article could use a good picture of August Möbius, wich im sure could be found anywhere, rather than only of his Möbius strip. The reason I dont do it it's because i'm not sure how.--64.32.92.84 23:33, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What about a picture

message: Why are there two different dates of birth in one article? I don't know his real birthday, but only one of them can be right! Erwin 13:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth

message: An i.p. editor (claiming irrelevantly to be a descendant) changed Herr Möbius's first name in the Möbius strip article from August to Augustus. I have reverted because (1) it should match the spelling in this article and (2) a majority of reliable sources I checked say it's August. However, it may be worth noting that the Columbia Encyclopedia says it's Augustus. That may be an error, but the Google hits are just about equal for both forms and not all of the –us hits are junk, by any means. I thought I'd bring this up here, in case anyone eventually wanders by who can shed any light. Rivertorch (talk) 07:35, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First names 