Talk:Lacticaseibacillus casei

message: *I've removed this text from the main entry as I've been unable to verify the status of L. casei shirota at any of the standard nomenclature sites (here, for example). If anyone can provide a authoritative reference for this sub-species, I'll be happy to integrate the info into the text. MarcoTolo 04:12, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ''L. casei shirota''

message: I don't think that these sentences are suitable for the article. They are too much specific. And when you read the article you feel that it goes suddenly from very general to too specific.--ArazZeynili 09:56, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Research 

message: The third paragraph for this article has some lines that are exactly the same as the article linked below.  Other lines are very similar.
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/healthnews.php?newsid=42290 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.20.127.214 (talk) 03:00, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  plagiarism? 

message: The drink DanActive brags incessently about how they have L. casei Immunitas in their drink and how this makes their product incredible.  I want to know more about this so I can tell if this product is actually worth buying.AThousandYoung 08:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ''L. casei Immunitas''

message: The first three paragraphs all need citations! (dont know how to do this)
Dont want to remove the info yet, but you cant have unsourced potential lies on here. ClamsonJ (talk) 21:45, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations!

message: From . See discussion: --Ronz (talk) 17:58, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential references

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lactobacillus casei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120610204805/http://www.chifountain.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/evidence-based-review-of-probiotics-for-antibiotic-associated-diarrhea-and-clostridium-difficile-infections.pdf to http://www.chifountain.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/evidence-based-review-of-probiotics-for-antibiotic-associated-diarrhea-and-clostridium-difficile-infections.pdf
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120913100237/http://www.pediatricsdigest.mobi/content/109/4/678.short to http://www.pediatricsdigest.mobi/content/109/4/678.short
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:24, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The old casei vs paracasei problem plagues the entire article. It plagues the taxonomy section (cleanup template placed), the Dairy section with the casual ATCC mention, and even the probiotics part. Yes, the entire probiotics part.
Remember DN-114001 and Shirota, and how  manages to sequence them? Here's the thing. The sequence classifies both as paracasei. See:
* DN-114001 (LcA): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/AQPP00000000 (NCBI reclassified in 2018, check "Taxonomic-Update-Statistics-START"), https://gtdb.ecogenomic.org/genome?gid=GCA_000400585.1 (GTDB)
* Shirota (LcY): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/ARNV00000000 (NCBI reclassified in 2018), https://gtdb.ecogenomic.org/genome?gid=GCA_000388095.2 (GTDB)
There will be no end to this pain. Well, by that I mean this is going to take hours of checking EVERY SOURCE and assigning EVERY STRAIN it mentions to the currently-correct species, then moving the content accordingly. (Or we actually need an article for the whole species complex. Still a lot of content movement.)
I'm just going to give up for now and chuck down some yogurt. Artoria2e5 🌉 13:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serious paracasei problem