lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Altocumulus cloud

message: I've brought together some images from other spots on Wikipedia, but now I am wondering whether some of them might not be cirrocumulus. It is difficult to judge the height of the clouds from the pictures alone. -- Solipsist 15:01, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've heard that altocumulus clouds form dramatic "flying saucer" shapes and can be mistaken for UFOs. Should this be entered?
:Altocumulus can form lying saucer shapes, but that is a special type of altocumulus called a Lenticular cloud (Altocumulus Lenticularis). They are formed on the lee side of mountains. --The High Fin Sperm Whale (talk) 17:51, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I would expect that they are formed from water droplets due to their height and appearance, but I'm not sure. --The High Fin Sperm Whale (talk) 17:51, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistaken for UFOs 

message: The cloud infobox says it is not a precipitation cloud, but :File:Virga 05.jpg shows Altocumulus virga. But isn't virga a form of precipitation? --The High Fin Sperm Whale (talk) 23:08, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Cloud types#Storm_Clouds|Precipitation cloud]]? 

message: In the text, only four species are mentioned, and Altocumulus floccus has been omitted. However, this species of cloud has been mentioned in the infobox, where five species are named. Search in Google Scholar and Google Books reveals enough reliable sources going back many years that have A. floccus as a recognised species of Altocumuls cluds. This needs to be included in the main text. Ashwin Baindur (User:AshLin) (talk) 11:42, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Altocumulus floccus not mentioned in main text
Talk:Janet Lee Bouvier

message: It seems improbable that the subject ever used the name "Janet Norton Lee Bouvier Auchincloss Morris", or that it is the name by which others would most commonly refer to her. Do the sources confirmt that this is the name she used or was best known by? -Will Beback · † · 23:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there's been no debate on the topic in three months I'll assume it isn't controversial and move it from "Janet Norton Lee Bouvier Auchincloss Morris" to "Janet Lee Bouvier".  ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 23:03, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move

message: Her birth year is listed as 1907 in the first paragraph, but she's included in the 1906 births category down at the bottom. Which is correct? --agatehawk  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.38.216.134 (talk) 18:05, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date

message: It is claimed in the list of Irish Americans that she was mostly of Irish descent. Where is the evidence for this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ausseagull (talk • contribs) 08:19, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Irish?

message: That is a fine picture of her home in Georgetown. It would be of interest to know what street it was in. Valetude (talk) 00:21, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her home
Talk:Lee Radziwill

message: Apart from the mention of parents there is nothing of ancestry in that section. - It should b e removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:16B8:5C2A:6600:4C68:5D23:E94:9633 (talk) 18:32, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early life and ancestry 

message: The information box shows three marriages.  The first is Michael Temple Canfield, which lasted from 1953 until it was “annulled” in 1962.  The second marriage is the Polish prince (1959-1974).  So what happened here?  She married someone while the status of her previous marriage was unresolved?  Well, no.  As the article on Canfield indicates, they were divorced in 1958.
The truth of the matter is that the “annulment” was merely a “Catholic divorce,” granted by Pope John XXIII.  Back then, the Catholic church was stiff and starchy and generally uncooperative about granting “annulments” so as to permit remarriage after divorce, but, hey, by then, she was the sister-in-law of the Catholic President of the United States, so the Pope could bend the rules for them.  Ordinary Catholics did not get the benefit of “Catholic divorces” until after the Second Vatican Council.
The article needs to be changed to show that she and Canfield were divorced in 1958, not that their marriage was “annulled” in 1962.  There is no reason to portray her and her Polish prince as bigamists.  71.223.77.216 (talk) 14:16, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Marriage Information is Inconsistent
Talk:Sub-provincial division

message: Is Guangzhou a subprovincial city?  — Instantnood 15:54, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
:From VI. The Local Administrative System:
2. City governments with sub-provincial ranking 
These refer to governments of relatively large cities whose economic plans are separately listed in the national planning, whose administrative status is lower than that of a full provincial government and which are not administratively controlled by provincial governments. These 15 cities are Shenyang, Dalian, Changchun, Harbin, Jinan, Qingdao, Nanjing, Ningbo, Hangzhou, Xiamen, Wuhan, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Xian and Chengdu.''
:Will add it to the list?--Huaiwei 13:18, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: This article should expand to other countries or be renamed to Sub-provincial city (PRC).  In Vietnam, there are 29 thành phố trực thuộc tỉnh which essentially have the same meaning. DHN 19:21, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The latter seems like a better idea. This article seems made to cover the PRC concept. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 21:06, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone ahead and done this. Following the pattern in other articles, I've used (China) as the disambiguator rather than (PRC). Heimstern Läufer (talk) 21:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other countries
Talk:Gynophilia

message: This is one of the worst articles I ever saw on WP. 99% of it are a rant how current concepts like homosexuality or transgender are baaad, but, besides not even bothering to state a reason for this assumption, this is hardly encyclopedic material. Compare Androphilia, that will make the problem clearer. Don't have the time right now to edit this BS, will do so later. -- AlexR 16:10, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Latvian National Armed Forces

message: I'm confused by the repeated vandalism of 'Raimonds Vējonis' as the Commander in Chief. He is no longer CiC, and was replaced by Otto von Sniegapika—Last January! Can anyone explain? I update and it gets turned back repeatedly, calling it 'vandalism'. This has become incredibly frustrating.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.27.229.128 (talk) 18:51, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Bad joke! Dukurs (talk) 16:05, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Repeated Vandalism

message: I am puzzled by the term "Swedish-Finnish model": for start, the Swedish and Finnish militaries are not very much alike, the Finnish system doesn't resemble the Latvian one much at all. Can anyone explain? -- 62.248.128.124 16:23, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No idea either, but it's what it says in an official US Department of State document, which is why I believe it to be correct. US Department of State on Latvia Solver 18:05, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: some pictures here http://sava4.narod.ru/photoarmija.html-- mrg3105mrg3105   09:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latvian forces in 1920s-40s 

message: There is a template at Template:Military ranks of Latvia which may be of use to editors of this page. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:41, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template 

message: You do realise that the regular Latvian land forces are bigger than the entire regular Latvian combined forces?
Someone needs to go over these numbers.
11:57, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size
Talk:Private good

message: Is "depletable" and "rivalrous" interchangeble? At least according to the Week 5 lecture they essencially means the same. Am I right? Anyone care to explain? wangsh45 (talk) 23:54, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Depletable" vs. "Rivalrous" 

message: I corrected some spelling and grammatical errors, also added a ISBN number and hyperlink on the reference.wangsh45 (talk) 17:47, 27 October 2011 :(UTC)
I added a little paragraph about free rider problem. Free rider is often associated with issues in public goods. Since it's already stated private good is the opposite of public goods, I think it helps to explain further the differences between private and public good by adding why free rider problems are unlikely to happen to private goods. wangsh45 (talk) 17:30, 27 October 2011 :(UTC)
I added a little change already by loosely defining what a "good" is and I hope it's ok if I add another key point to the definition. Private goods should also be depletable. 
SADeGroot (talk) 16:25, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summaries of Edits 

message: Overrall your edits were good and added relevant material to the article, there's still a long way to go though. I've made some changes to format your additions according to Wikipedia's house style which you'll learn as you go along. I'm suprised how poorly covered this topic is, and having studied Economics, I'd be happy to work with you on it. If you focus on adding substantive material I can copyedit and do clean-up tasks as you go, the changes I make after will help you learn about formatting on Wikipedia. Apologies for my delay in responding to your request. Best, --Ktlynch (talk) 13:04, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments on these edits
Template talk:Law by year cat

message: `I've taken the individual "X in law" categories out of the root "Law by year" category since they're all in "Xth century law" categories which belong to law by year anyway. I feel this is in accordance with the guidelines at Wikipedia:Categorization, which say "A good general rule is that articles should be placed in the most specific categories they reasonably fit in." Hope this isn't controversial, I figured I should mention my reasoning just in case. Bryan 17:00, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As I've mentioned on my usertalk page but should mention here as well for posterity, this was a dumb mistake on my part that I blame on not being fully awake yet when I did it. Odd that I had the presence of mind to explain my motivation fully but not to notice that what I was doing was all messed up. :) Bryan 00:46, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Jimmie Johnson

message: *In general, there should be more content for each year. Maybe explain the major wins and a little about the key events of the season. On the Alan Kulwicki article, I gave kept a running commentary about how his 1992 championship season progressed. This is appropriate for each of his championships.
**Such as what races, the 500, the Brickyard? Nascar1996 01:48, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: *I found a problem, a particularly big one. The Team Lowe's Racing reference has now set that page where you have to log in to see it. I'll be looking for another reference. -- Nascar1996(Talk • Contribs) 01:08, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer review by [[User:Royalbroil]]

message: Is there a source that actually states that Johnson was actually born in El Cajon? I ask because there is no hospital in El Cajon, unless he was born at home which is rare, even then. The closest hospital is in La Mesa and there are several in San Diego. JOJ Hutton 02:55, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Jimmie's official biography says he was born in El Cajon. - The Bushranger One ping only 03:18, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Well that would be some trick since El Cajon has no maternity hospital. Even in 1975 it was very rare to be born outside a hospital or at home. I realize that he is from El Cajon, but could it be possible that someone inferred that he was actually born in El Cajon simply because he grew up there? Just seems very odd and very unlikely, despite what the source claims.--JOJ Hutton 12:26, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, since multiple sources that, presumably, have gotten it "straight from the horse's mouth" (Jimmie's official site and Hendrick's driver page for him) explicitly say "born in El Cajon", it's what we have to go with, unlikely as it sounds. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:31, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm never one to edit against the sources even when I'm fairly confident that they must be wrong because there is no hospital for him to have been born in El Cajon. There is a slim chance that he was born at home, but that's very slim. JOJ Hutton 20:50, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  City of birth 

message: On June 27, 2023, Jimmie’s parents and son were murdered at their Oklahoma residence in an apparent murder-suicide. Bluesky9795 (talk) 22:07, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:33, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 June 2023 

message: 98.97.60.161 (talk) 06:28, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 October 2023 

message: Change his car number in the opening bio from 84 to 48. 67.242.49.251 (talk) 00:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: See Legacy_Motor_Club#Car_No._84_history. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:04, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 February 2024
Talk:Stan Bush

message: * Is it You've Got the Touch, or simply The Touch? --24.44.37.202 17:20, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You could be right, I will have to do some more thorough searching, since many different sources state either, with no one obviously being correct. --82.3.32.75 19:32, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: (untitled)
Talk:Bay rum

message: As the article clearly explains, Bay rum is rum but not a drink. Please stop listing it as a food-stub. Thanks. Kosebamse 17:27, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, forget it; with a little more research, I discover that my recipe is indeed wrong. -- Securiger 06:24, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Eli Thomas Reich

message: For this article, you may wish to get a picture of Sealion from circa WWII. http://www.navsource.org/archives/08/08315.htm has one marked "USN Archive photo": http://www.navsource.org/archives/08/0831509.jpg . (It's not the clearest, which is why I uploaded the 1956 one with the helicopter.)
—wwoods 07:20, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads up, it would definately be better to have the ww2 era photo on the article. Will get right on that :)  ALKIVAR™ 10:02, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Sealion'' picture 

message: The museum's website says it's in Keyport: http://www.keyportmuseum.cnrnw.navy.mil/location.htm#Map .
—wwoods 08:14, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naval Undersea Museum 
Talk:Kang bed-stove

message: This article looks like something copied from a magazine, or more likely, a website. There's no source attributed, so it looks like plagiary to me.
Mihoshi 17:38, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I wrote it. The photograph, if you will check the record attached, is from an old book that is long past the copyright time limit. P0M 06:11, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry. Didn't mean to accuse you of anything, I just wasn't thinking.
Mihoshi 03:58, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Source 

message: P0M: It's always good to add a source for the factual information, as it allows verification and source credibility assessment. — David Remahl 00:11, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of staement about source of facts

message: I went a little further than I meant in the beginning rewording the opening paragraph to be more direct. Treat it as a suggestion, and please change any edits back that you choose. Regards. Alpha Ralpha Boulevard 12:54, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Style edits

message: The article mentions masonry stoves and ceramic stoves but the word hypocaust only occurs as a bibliographic entry. Surely the hypocaust is a much closer equivalent to the kang and should be discussed in the article? 131.111.85.79 (talk) 11:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hypocaust 

message: 24.50.151.151 (talk) 19:25, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perhaps a diagram or actual pic of flue workings?
Talk:Hogan's Alley (FBI)

message: My thanks to the http://wordorigins.org discussion board for helping with the etymology of the term "Hogan's Alley", especially the 1931 NYT article reference linking it to Camp Perry, and for the proofreading and comments.  scot 17:54, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The FBI owned an older training facility named, "Hogan's Alley," that was shown in the Jimmy Stewart film in 1959, "The FBI Story."  Today, a friend of mine mentioned that Wikipedia starts the article as stating that Hogan's Alley began in 1987, and completely does not mention the history of Hogan's Alley before before that date.  According to the website, "www.diselpunks.org," "G-Men in Hogan's Alley," the original Hogan's Alley was opened by the FBI as a training facility for newer agents in the early '30's.  This deletion of history is also talked about in the website, historicalgmen.squarespace.com, in their article:  Faded Glory: Dusty Roads of an FBI ERA.  Both of the mentioned websites show the picture of the older FBI facility, and the diselpunks website talks about the development of the forgotten facility built in the 1930's.  The actual facility in the pictures of the above website is shown in that movie in 1959, "The FBI Story," and the actual facility name, "Hogan's Alley," is in the movie, and was being used in the 1959 time period.  It was showing his friend's only son walking through Hogan's Alley in the movie, making a few mistakes.  The other historical site should be in this Wikipedia article.  As a matter of fact, since there was really an actual training facility for the FBI, named Hogan's Alley, before 1987, it makes the entire article incorrect.Easeltine (talk) 17:49, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real FBI History of Hogan's Alley
Talk:Nitrosoproline

message: This seems suspicious. Never have I heard of a particle called a prolino, much less an elementary particle, none of which have yet been found. The first sentence goes "A prolino is a conjectured elementary particle, being the theorized atomic constituents of electrons". Richard Feynman did not think up an elementary particle. It is self-contradictory, too. It cannot be antimatter and a constituent of an electron at the same time, since an electron is matter. JakeGHz 18:03, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: I've done some research and a prolino actually exists in chem as an abbreviation for proline nitrous oxide. In that case, it would be proliNO. My suggestion is to reform this article to make it conform to the chemical meaning. JakeGHz 15:37, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prolino Deletion 

message: This article seems highly dubious to me.
* Per source 2 (Saavedra), proline + NO + sodium methoxide are used in the reaction giving ProliNO, not ProliNO itself. Given that sodium methoxide is highly caustic, it seems unlikely that it is part of a mixture being investigated for clinical use.
* The same source says ProliNO has two units of NO per proline, as opposed to one as given in the info box of this article. I can't figure out where the second NO is supposed to be.
All in all, I think ProliNO is a compound different from nitrosoproline, but I don't know what its structure is. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 14:04, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed 

message: PROLI/NO is different compound, than nitrosoproline. Nitrosoproline does NOT have any medical use.
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Proli_no
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/n-Nitrosoproline
88.115.35.1 (talk) 03:40, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pure confusion
Talk:Leeds Grammar School

message: Was Leeds Grammar School the first school in Leeds? Gunnar Larsson 18:31, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Deleting from his entry in Past pupils:
:... who actually went to Leeds Modern School
In fact he did not: you can piece together an assertion by him to this effect from letters exchanged in the editoial section of the London Review of Books, or you can take at face value assertions made by LGS in the Old Leodiensians report.  I'm not sure where the idea that AB when to LMS originated, but I suspect it was here on Wikipedia. --- Charles Stewart 19:43, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Following email correspondence, I'm persuaded that Bennett was at LMS from when he was 12 until when he left school.  The claim that Bennett was at LGS isn't refuted, but it looks dubious, so I'm deleting it. --- Charles Stewart 16:27, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Alan Bennett

message: There were not 3400n students at LGS. More like half that number. Looks like we have the Grammar School at Leeds number of students. --Tagishsimon (talk) 17:01, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Students
Talk:Opposition to the Charest government

message: *This article provides a very unbalanced and biased view of the subject, with no attempt made at presenting opposing viewpoints.  It appears to violate the guidelines in Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and may even constitute content forking.  Even the article title strikes me as POV.  Skeezix1000 18:36, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right: this is a content fork and the title is inherently POV. I suggest merging it to Jean Charest. Thanks for bringing the article to everybody's attention: I came across it some time ago and thought something ought to be done, but I didn't have time at the moment and, of course, completely forgot about it. Indefatigable 19:48, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't even know where to start with this article.  None of it is sourced, and much of it consists of overly broad and unsubstantiated claims.  Yes, the Charest government has been quite unpopular, but this article appears to have been written by a PQ militant.  I haven't been following the ups and downs of the Charest government closely enough to help craft a balanced, NPOV article.  Unless someone comes up with a better solution, it might be best to redirect it to Jean Charest, as Indefatigable suggests, while placing the existing text here on the talk page, so that someone could, if so motivated, take a crack at fixing this article.  Or maybe draft a short stub, with a new article title, with the problem sections moved to the talk page. Skeezix1000 13:34, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Really, the whole article could pretty much be compressed into a paragraph or two.Habsfannova 19:52, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality in dispute