Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Woodworking

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 04:10, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: :Category:Green woodworking tools is up for deletion here: :WP:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 March 24#Category:Green woodworking tools
 Andy Dingley (talk) 22:52, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  CfD of [[:Category:Green woodworking tools]] 

message: Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone.  Articles were selected based on their assessed  importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Woodworking-related articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details.  You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Sunday, November 14th. 
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end  of November, 2010.  As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide.  Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback! 
If you have already provided feedback, we deeply appreciate it. For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 16:39, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woodworking-related articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release 

message: Hello, my friends: A group of us are working on clearing the backlog at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Articles_lacking_sources_from_October_2006. The article in the above header has been without sources for the past four years and might b e removed if none are added. I wonder if you can help find one or two good references. Sincerely, and all the best to you, GeorgeLouis (talk) 20:17, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Bead (woodworking)]] 

message: The usage of Carpenters is under discussion, see Talk:The Carpenters. 64.229.100.153 (talk) 04:40, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Carpenters"

message: I just started this, and don't quite know what I'm doing. Please help improve it. Then I will add it to articles. Many thanks.
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:11, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New navbox 

message: I was invited to join this group. I see there is a list of "members" but I do not see how to join. It seems to me there should be a way to join the group on this page. Thanks. Jim Derby (talk) 13:15, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Ease of joining Project Woodworking

message: Hello,Please note that Hammer, which is within this project's scope, has been selected to become a Today's Article for Improvement. The article is currently in the TAFI Holding Area, where comments are welcome about ideas to improve it. After the article is moved from the holding area to the TAFI schedule, it will appear on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Today's Article for Improvement" section for one week. Everyone is invited to participate in the discussion and encouraged to collaborate to improve the article.
Thank you,
TheOriginalSoni (talk) 07:30, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: TAFI

message: I just added the WikiProject Woodworking template to the article on Green woodworking. Its only a stub but I assessed it as high importance.  Feel free to downgrade that if you think that is too high. Alexbateman (talk) 12:19, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Green woodworking added 

message: Has there been any discussion of adding a statistics table such as found here to the Project? These are a good way to easily keep track of how many articles are in the project and find ones that need attention. Alexbateman (talk) 12:26, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I just added this.  I hope I got the plumbing right. It seems that the table refers to Woodworking-related as the name of the WikiProject. Perhaps that is an historical name. Anyway, some work to do to rate the unassessed articles. Alexbateman (talk) 07:56, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project statistics 

message: The usage of  is under discussion, see talk:tortoiseshell material -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 02:44, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "{{noredirect|tortoiseshell}}"

message: :File:Rupintojas.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 70.24.244.158 (talk) 07:54, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Rupintojas.jpg

message: *Portal:Technology
I've nominated Portal:Technology for featured candidacy. Comments would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Technology. — Cirt (talk) 01:58, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portal:Technology for featured candidacy 

message: A notice about red rot has been placed at WT:CHEMISTRY -- 70.24.244.161 (talk) 19:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Wood redrot

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: Hello,Please note that Sun deck, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article was scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! 
Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:08, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement! 

message: I just requested an article for my Company Wikipedia:Requested_articles/Business_and_economics/CompaniesWe are a Hardwood Flooring company who is the pioneer of radiant heat wood flooring.
Launstein Hardwood Floors 384 S Every Rd Mason, MI 48854 (888) 339-4639
If anyone is interested I would love the opportunity to collaborate with you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dan P48854 (talk • contribs) 17:32, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Author Request Hardwood Floors over Radiant Heat Sources 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Goat Canyon Trestle#Inaccuracies.  RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 01:30, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[Talk:Goat Canyon Trestle#Inaccuracies]]

message: A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
:– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new newsletter directory is out! 

message: Hello! Is this WikiProject still inactive? I would like to join, should I sign my name under "participants?". I am currently writing articles for women woodworkers, studio furniture makers, and craftspeople. See Wendy Maruyama, Janice Smith, and April Stone. I would love to start tackling larger articles such as Studio Craft, American craft, and Studio Furniture, but would need more than one brain on those articles. 
Thanks! Terasaface (talk) 17:49, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still Inactive? 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: Hey there,
I'm looking for comments / additions / re-arranging of this template. Thanks. François Robere (talk) 19:30, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cataloguing patterns and motifs 

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources 

message: FYI, the article CCG Profiles has been proposed for deletion (WP:PROD). The first sentences summarize the subject thusly:
*
The nominator wrote this summary of their concerns:
*
If you agree or disagree with deletion, there are instructions on the deletion notice for what to do.
Thanks,
--A. B. (talk • contribs  •  global count) 15:18, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed for deletion (PROD): [[CCG Profiles]]