Talk:Politics of outer space/Archive 1

message: Better delete this artical. even if we do politics with ET. I think we will call it Interstellar politics or somting like that not Exopolitics.
Keep.  If this page is still being nominated for deletion, I say to keep it.  Although it's on a theoretical topic, that doesn't make it any less noteworthy.  What would politics be like when dealing with an alien society?  Maybe we should connect this to Outside Context Problem or Alien Invasion.  The article does need to be cleaned up tho.  Baiter 04:02, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion 

message: An encyclopedic listing should inform.   This is a complex concept which is emerging in real time. It has profound implications and people need to know about it.  Every word in the current definition is accurate.  There is information which people can use.   Edits based upon informed understanding of this concept are, of course appropriate.   Expansion of factual information is wonderful.   Attempting to describe this concept in a few sentences unacceptable.  
"The Civil War was a conflict between American states." is not an encyclopedic article.  
One last point.  There are people who know a great deal about exopolitics.  It would be constructive if those who know next to nothing about the subject would defer to those who are devoting their working lives to the subject.
StephenBassett 10:08, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  exopolitics 

message: Yes indeed.  Correction made.  StephenBassett 09:31, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong date. 

message: A tag has been placed on :Exopolitics, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
::Please re-read WP:CSD, the rationale given does not fit any CSD category. If you still believe that this article should be removed from Wikipedia please list it up on articles for deletion. Thank you.--Jersey Devil 02:30, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion of [[:Exopolitics]]

message: Ok I am going to start updating this article today and tomorrow and for the rest of the week, if anyone would like to join me please do so (:O) -Nima Baghaei talk · contributions 20:58, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *I updated External links today, I will start adding references and citation tomorrow, join the part hehe (:O) -Nima Baghaei talk · cont 21:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *well i have updated the references a bit (i figured i couldn't wait tell tomorrow), but I will go ahead and clean up the references tomorrow using correct citation and improving on the article (:O) -Nima Baghaei talk · cont 21:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Well i couldnt help myself, I went ahead and fixed the citation style for a few of the references today, I will finish the rest tomorrow hehe (:O) -Nima Baghaei talk · cont 21:37, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *The updating process is going very well, I should put in an additional few sentenecs tomorrow or so, join the fun if you want (:O) -Nima Baghaei talk · cont 23:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating 

message: Ok I am going to start updating this article today and tomorrow and for the rest of the week, if anyone would like to join me please do so (:O) -Nima Baghaei talk · contributions 20:58, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *I updated External links today, I will start adding references and citation tomorrow, join the part hehe (:O) -Nima Baghaei talk · cont 21:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *well i have updated the references a bit (i figured i couldn't wait tell tomorrow), but I will go ahead and clean up the references tomorrow using correct citation and improving on the article (:O) -Nima Baghaei talk · cont 21:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Well i couldnt help myself, I went ahead and fixed the citation style for a few of the references today, I will finish the rest tomorrow hehe (:O) -Nima Baghaei talk · cont 21:37, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *The updating process is going very well, I should put in an additional few sentenecs tomorrow or so, join the fun if you want (:O) -Nima Baghaei talk · cont 23:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating 

message: *found the location where this was insereted in the articles history, but the user who put it in was a IP and not logged in if they have (had) an account ... so I am gonna ask some people in the space community if they know anything about this and I will also try to check some search engines, if anyone else wants to help that would be great! (:O) -Nima Baghaei talk · cont 21:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *They say it may have something to do with Paul Davies (:O) -Nima Baghaei talk · cont 02:34, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

text: *I moved it here b/c from what I getting from my searches, it seems someone may have just simply made this up, but lets keep this here in just as a backup copy in case we can find a reference, is that ok with everyone? (:O) -Nima Baghaei talk · cont 02:45, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian University 

message: This whole article seems extremely biased in favor of the existence of extraterrestrial life. Something for which there is no real evidence of. It seems like a bunch of made-up nonsense to me. 75.72.177.85 (talk) 23:27, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV? 

message: Someone rewrite the following sentence in a better way.
Exopolitics is the theoretical study of hypothetical political relations between humanity and extraterrestrial civilizations.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Srinivasasha (talk • contribs) 08:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite the first line