lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bisphenol-A

message: I have not heard an scientific proof that bisphenol-A can decompose from poly-bisphenol-A, nor that it is absorbed into the bloodstream intact through the digestive pathway or through contact in any significant quantity. This entry is ignorant fear-mongering.
I recommend that the article is changed to tell some actual science about the chemistry of bisphenol, how it acts as an estrogenic, and the properties of the polymer.
Also, the grammar is bad, and the compound name is mispelled in two different ways.
--------------
I have merged this page into Bisphenol_A. 192.203.205.129 22:45, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Sinkang Manuscripts

message: *荷蘭統治之下的台灣教會語言學
Mababa 08:20, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: ) You mean 「番仔契」?? How about "contracts of the aborigines"?? I am not an expert on this. However, I thought the beside the meaning specifically refering to the compiled contracts, Sinckan Manuscripts can also be used to refer the writing form of the language. I guess that may not be an huge problem to keep the information here. However, I could be wrong. Let me express my appreciation of your work on this article. You are my hero.--Mababa 01:37, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=5CDUYQ3S-V0C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=hlnKRaZ0f4QC&pg=PA35#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=hlnKRaZ0f4QC&pg=PA36#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=abMMAQAAMAAJ
Rajmaan (talk) 23:04, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern studies of the Sinckan Manuscripts
Talk:Titanic (disambiguation)

message: Add  * Support  or  * Oppose  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
*Weak support See discussion. Septentrionalis 20:18, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: the titanic also weighed 15,000 tons (300,000 lbs)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Volkn (talk • contribs) 23:39, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Weight]

message: Here's a question I posted for guidance at the wp:disambiguation page talk page:  Are sub-articles inappropriate for a disambig page? 
I'm involved with a topic/article (RMS Titanic) where the main article is huge and the topic is huge (lots of sub-articles and related articles) with the sub articles mostly (or all) linked in-line or as "see also" in the individual sections.  I think that it would be useful to communicate which sub-articles exist, I've been at the article for a half year and am still learning which exist; it's very hard to see this from in-line links and notes in the section headers.  I first thought of listing them in "see also", but I think that the guidelines for that clearly exclude articles that are already linked in the article.  So I though of using the disambig page to list them and then listing the dis-ambig page as a "see also" in the main article, there being no specific exclusion of this here.     I was reverted at both, the person saying that dis-ambig pages are only for listing where there is true ambiguity and that the "see also" section should be used for this. I was thinking that folks here would have more of persepctive on this than I do on this.  Is it a common or OK practice to list sub-articles on the dis-ambig page? If so, possibly a mention of that could be added.   And if not, do any folks have experience on the best way to do this? North8000 (talk) 16:11, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: See my suggestion at WT:D#Are sub-articles inappropriate for a disambig page?.--ShelfSkewed Talk 16:40, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks!North8000 (talk) 20:15, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: List of sub-articles

message: The usage of  is up for discussion, see talk: RMS Titanic -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 12:34, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "{{noredirect|Titanic}}"
Talk:California State Route 3

message: I found the following on https://roads.dot.ca.gov — would it be appropriate to include it? 
SR 3
[IN THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA AREA]
"SNOW IS NOT REMOVED FROM THE TRAVELWAY NIGHTS, WEEKENDS & HOLIDAYS" FROM 20 MI NORTH OF TRINITY CENTER (TRINITY CO) TO 3 MI SOUTH OF CALLAHAN (SISKIYOU CO) /SCOTT MOUNTAIN/ - MOTORISTS ARE ADVISED TO CARRY CHAINS
Kevink707 (talk) 04:46, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: They actually do a pretty good job of keeping Scott Mtn drivable, regardless of the warnings they might not. It might be good to mention that the mountain does get a lot of snow and can be impassable in the winter, though. 69.131.171.196 (talk) 03:53, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of snow removal  

message: CA 3 passes the communities of Covington Mill, Trinity Center, and Coffee Creek. At Coffee Creek, CA 3 starts to follow the Trinity River. 69.131.171.196 (talk) 03:56, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wyntoon not on CA 3 in Trinity County
Talk:Brood parasitism

message: Suggest adding "intraspecific brood parasitism has been recorded in 234 avian species" 
This is the most up to date count on the number of bird species that perform intraspecific brood parasitism. Scolypopa (talk) 04:08, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 June 2022 

message: All or almost all species of parasite ants (where a queen invades the anthill of another species, in some cases killing the host queen, and their larvae was taken care by the host worker ants)  should not be also considered brood parasites? They seem undistinguishable from the examples of wasps and bumblebees in the article. Or are not included because the host workers also feed the parasite queen, and not only the larvae? MiguelMadeira (talk) 03:41, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Mm, they are treated rather differently by biologists. All we can do is to follow the scientific sources here. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:15, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parasite ants 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: page moved.  Arbitrarily0 (talk) 19:25, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Brood parasite →  – Consistent with Parasitism, better a page about a phenomenon than about a single individual. Taylor 49 (talk) 15:03, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 June 2023
Talk:Mary Miller (art historian)

message: On April 15, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was keep.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Mary Miller for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 00:20, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD
Template talk:Otherpeople

message: There is Template:Otherpersons for more or less the same case. -- User:Docu
:Sorry, did not see that one when I created this, I guess because it's not in use much. I used the wording found most often in these situations for this template. --Dryazan 22:44, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and redirected Template:Otherpersons to this template because they are relatively the same, but this template has an additional parameter. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 21:39, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Centrx has changed this three times, and been reverted three times.  This is a template used in an enormous number of articles, so could we please cut down on changes without consensus? Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 17:16, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, so explain why it should use the less accurate "people". —Centrx→talk • 18:49, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Persons is the correct word when dealing with multiple independent individuals. People is for collective or indefinite uses; though it is used as a mere multiple of the word person, persons is clearer and better suited. Persons is used for certain kinds of specific numbers, as in "There were 12 persons at the party", but if you were to say "The 12 people at the party were rowdy" that is an indefinite usage despite having a specific number (the rowdiness is a collective property, and perhaps some of the 12 were not even rowdy). On Wikipedia, the articles are distinct and about persons who may have lived hundreds of years apart and have no relation whatsoever. There is nothing collective or indefinite (definite is not the same as having a fixed number); it is not about the people of a country or the people that is a group of friends. —Centrx→talk • 18:42, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

text: We don't see that they are individually happy. We say "happy people", for example, because we look around and see a indefinite mass of happiness, but that doesn't include the several persons standing around not happy, but they are lost in the hub-bub. —Centrx→talk • 01:53, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

text: If you met five John Smiths, it would be precise to say "I met five persons named John Smith" ("There are a lot of people named John Smith" is a general, indefinite statement). Clearly, "people" is often used as a simple plural, but these examples are still more appropriate for that use than is referring to several distinct articles on Wikipedia. Meeting people is entirely different from articles in an encyclopedia. —Centrx→talk • 16:15, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  People or persons 

message: I've nominated the Otheruses templates for discussion on Wikipedia:Templates for deletion. --JB Adder | Talk 14:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD notice
Talk:Berenice (daughter of Herod Agrippa)

message: There seem to be two pages for the same woman: this one, and one for "Berenice (daughter of Agrippa I)". Should they be combined into one?
nmw
:Merger done --Steerpike 16:17, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have found a few issues that need to be addressed:
*The lead needs to be expanded per WP:LEAD
*For birthdate it needs to be clarified whether it is AD or BC
Once these are fixed please leave a note on my talk page and I'll check back. T Rex | talk 02:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your time. Edits done! --Steerpike 22:02, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Congratulations. It meets all the criteria. 03:16, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA on hold

message: I think it would be beneficial if an infobox was provided as well as a picture, given that this article is a good article. talk 05:45, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:Coat of arms of Jordan

message: Given that there is a new king, would the text in the scroll at the bottom of the CoA have changed? Danny 00:39, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: yes it has. It now says Abdullah son of Hussein son of Aoun. --Fjmustak 01:24, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

message: This coat of arms is obselete, and should not be used! The new one could be seen here (Jordanian State Department's webpage) . you can see a high res version of it here.   Bakkouz (talk) 16:32, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is an obselete Coat of Arms. 
Talk:Peter Pan Bus Lines

message: It would be nice to see some coverage of how Peter Pan abandoned Western CT service in the last few years.  Examples include Danbury, Waterbury and points north to Springfield.  This happened in response to CT state allowing free travel for students on the bus and coach lines without consultation with the operator in a classic example of poor policy Peter Pan said the routes were no longer economic and pulled out leaving everyone without service.
https://www.ctinsider.com/news/article/Peter-Pan-State-U-Pass-CT-drove-decision-to-stop-16907742.php
What is the relationship of Peter Pan with Greyhound Lines?  They typically share ticketing counters (right down to the agents) and Peter Pan-operated trips come up when one searches schedules at Greyhound.com. -Etoile 00:47, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Answered now, I hope, at least a little. -- Beland 17:45, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: thumb
It seems like Peter Pan bus line uses the Diseney Tinkerbell character, if not the Peter Pan character. What are the terms of this arrangement? —Ben FrantzDale 20:20, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diseney License?
Talk:Constitution of North Dakota

message: For scholarship, I have difficulty calling the constitution a document. If, for example, the document is destroyed (or even all extant textual copies destroyed), is the constitution destroyed or invalidated? I think not.  The constitution is a body of law which may be written down on paper, or recorded in some other way.  The original constitution was written on paper; today, it's recorded electronically, and may be published in various forms, like books. Nor is it quite proper to call the constitution the "most basic" law - the most basic law, in a vernacular sense, is laws that protect us against assault, for example.  Constitutional law isn't "basic" so much as a codification of high principles - it's the highest (state) law in the state.  The wording of the entire article is unusually poor for scholarly text.Sbalfour (talk) 18:39, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  is the constitution definitionally a document?
Talk:O2 Xda

message: Details of later models added, minor edits to earlier info. ajf 01:26, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC)
Added xda Neo, xda Trion and photos for all models. richardlai 01:22, June 04, 2006 (GMT)
Added XDA IIs, although couldn't find suitable picture. --F355 10:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Shouldn't the XDA Terra be added? Supposedly it's a HTC Herald.The Seventh Taylor 15:00, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold and add them (if you have information about them). ~~ [Jam][talk] 11:49, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing models 

message: Anyone know where the name Xda comes from? It looks like an acronym, but is always printed in mixed case. Strange. --Jon186 (talk) 00:27, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Found out here and added to article. --Jon186 (talk) 20:28, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name Xda 

message: I've added details of the two soon-to-be-released XDA models as there seems to be enough evidence across the internet of their brand names and equivalent HTC models. O2 themselves are already selling accessories for both XDA models which confirms their 'XDA names' and there are pages like the following which link the XDA name to the HTC equivalent:
http://www.intercitydata.com/news/2008/07/o2-launch-of-xda-mantle-in-july.html
http://www.globalcertificationforum.org/Application/onlinecertification/terminalinfo/?terminalId=1427
If that's not enough evidence and someone wants to rip this section out again then fair enough.
62.189.108.219 (talk) 09:31, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Models 

message: I saw O2's version of the HTC Touch Diamond in an O2 shop in Germany and it was branded "O2 XDA Diamond" -- not Ignito. Does the branding differ per country (e.g. Germany vs UK)? The Seventh Taylor (talk) 15:15, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, I already found the answer here: Talk:HTC Touch Diamond#XDA brand: wrong name -- The Seventh Taylor (talk) 12:27, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  XDA Diamond or Ingito 

message: The "current" models listed were released in 2008. Are there really any current Xda models or should this article by put into the past tense? --Pelago (talk) 14:35, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. The Seventh Taylor (talk) 21:24, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current in 2012? 

message: It would be great if somebody could add the Windows version for each model, notably the ones before Windows Mobile 5.0. The Seventh Taylor (talk) 23:51, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windows versions 

message: xda developer 2A02:908:959:BE60:D6D8:D7F9:5A73:89DC (talk) 12:38, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I did work on developing and optimize the GPRS network foe O2 that time was one of 3 engineers on xda HTC project
Talk:DAIWA Securities

message: I marked this with the cleanup template.RJFJR 02:16, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC)
*<S>What is the name of the bond trader who lost 1.1 billion?</S>
*<S>Billion what? (US dollars?)</S>
*References!  (I can't find it in google from what I know here).
*more details on how lost that much money
*Any legal or company policy changes as a result?
A google for Daiwa billion found a press release on the company being indicted.  That cleared up name of trader and that it was billion US dollars.  I added a link to it.  There is more material that can be added to the article. RJFJR 17:29, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: (possible) Things to do
Talk:Operation Red Sheet

message: Hello I'm new here, but I have many details I can add to this article (some already added), all from a book written about it by Dani shalom, called "Like a Bolt Out of the Blue" (in Hebrew "KeRa'am BeYom Bahir").
Since the name was incorrect, and I don't know exactly how to change the main title, I ask those who do know, to change it to "Operation Moked" or "Operation Focus".
Thank you. Greenlad 02:54, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:J. Hamilton Lewis

message: James Hamilton Lewis? J. Hamilton Lewis? James H. Lewis? Which one is it?
Being a rather old senator, it's hard to say. From the bits of research I did to piece this article together, I have chosen the second option. The actual Congress page mentioned "Hammy" Lewis, so this made the most sense to me. If anyone has any information suggesting otherwise, please say so here. --BDD 02:25, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Format
Talk:Bandiagara

message: * Article: :fr:Bandiagara
* Corresponding English-language article: Bandiagara
* Worth doing because: Important Malian city
* Originally Requested by: Darwinek 09:56, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments from [[WP:TIE]]
Talk:Decolonisation of Africa

message: FYI, this is a requested article. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:26, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Resistance to colonial rule in Africa]] 

message: the useful part of the article is the well-done chart showing all the colonies involved the main text is not well done it all, and does not closely follow the the reliable sources. I will try to fix that, starting with the French overseas empire.  I deleted several sections that look at the late 20th early 21st centuries, long after decolonization took place. Rjensen (talk) 03:39, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll be honest, for a top-importance article, I'm kind of shock how... empty this is. Rjrya395 (talk) 02:05, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Major problems

message: The government of the United States never officially ruled over Liberia. Liberia was founded by the American Colonization Society, which was a private organization unaffiliated with the U.S. government. Jaqoc (talk) 21:54, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: yes but the US government took a special protective interest in Liberia well into the 20th century --it helped finance and defend the colony.  Worldwide course many colonies began as private company operations (including the 13 american colonies and most of the German colonies)Rjensen (talk) 00:57, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it accurate to describe the United States as a colonial power for Liberia? 

message: ...Despite this continued reliance and unfair trading terms, a meta-analysis of 18 African countries found that a third of countries experienced increased economic growth post-independence...
I am not sure what the author was trying to say. Continues reliance on the export of raw materials ?
Unfair trading terms - what exactly is this referring to ? Have looked through the source cited but cannot find details  דןברקת (talk) 14:24, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economic legacy 

message: Are we discussing Newfoundland (and exactly how is that a "short-term opportunity" anyway? Same question for Massachusetts and Georgia. I concur with the lack of focus banner. Article needs surgery. Adding refimprove
Elinruby (talk) 10:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Why
Talk:The Suburbs (band)

message: New 'Burbs article, probably needs a little cleanup which I'll get to....Rx StrangeLove 03:00, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: New Suburbs

message: World War III/Change Agent came out before their first album "In Combo". So I was a step forward, but from thier initial 9 song 7" debut album.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.103.154 (talk) 18:17, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology 

message: http://www.twintone.com/
At TwinTone, the list of records looks like this:
    	- - 1978 - -                	
7801	The Suburbs: The Suburbs    	7" EP (Twin/Tone)
7802	Curtiss A: Spooks           	7" EP (Twin/Tone)
7803	Fingerprints                	7" EP (Twin/Tone)
7804	Fingerprints: Christmas Down	7"single (Twin/Tone)
7805	The Jets: Paper Girl        	7"single (Twin/Tone)
    	- - 1979 - -                          	
7906	The Commandos Commit Suicide          	live album (Twin/Tone)
7907	Big Hits of Mid-America Volume III    	double album (Twin/Tone)
7909	The Suburbs: World War III            	7" single (Twin/Tone)
7910	Orchid Spangiafora: Flee Past Apes Alf	album (Twin/Tone)
7911	Hypstrz: Live                         	7" EP (Twin/Tone)
7912	Curtiss A: I Don't Wanna Be President 	7" single (Twin/Tone)
    	- - 1980 - -                    	
8013	Fingerprints: "Smiles For Sale" 	7" single (Twin/Tone)
8014	The Suburbs: In Combo           	album (Twin/Tone)
8015	Curtiss A: Courtesy             	album (Twin/Tone)
8017	The Pistons: "Investagations"   	7" single (Twin/Tone)
8018	The Overtones: Red Checker Wagon	7" single (Twin/Tone)
8019	Curtiss A: "Afraid"             	7" single (Twin/Tone)
I am listening to a tape I make for myself of 45s which has WWIII and the Overtones single on it right now. I used to own the orginal Suburbs EP, but I lost that. Change Agent is like A Hard Days Night in that it starts with an arresting guitar chord, then the drums kick in and they never stop. That song and Prehistoric Jaws were my favorite Suburbs songs. At that point they were clearly a punk rock band, but that was short lived, wasn't it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.103.154 (talk) 19:02, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  TwinTone Records 

message: The City Pages blog which earlier announced Bruce Allen's death now includes this correction:
:Editor's note: Based on information received from several sources, City Pages initially reported that Bruce Allen passed away this morning. We regret this error. Our sympathies go out to Bruce and his friends and family on this sad day.
It's very sad, but let's not rush to put his epitaph here. MFNickster (talk) 04:40, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bruce Allen's death
Talk:Audobon ballroom (New York City)

message: I wrote the stub on Apr 28 2005.  I am a newbie so I have to work on the redirect and links.  McDogm
:I moved this article from Audobon ballroom (new york city) to Audobon ballroom (New York City).  I don't know what people want to do with the redirect from the old page. --Randolph 04:10, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audobon Ballroom (New York City)