Talk:Carl von Bismarck

message: To C Fred: the source is the German Parliament, I can read in the history of this page that you have been incessantly changing the content of the page. Are you a paid writer? Why would you edit a page of a person you don't know and why would you doubt the German Government source?
:Pinging . On one of your questions, on WP we are supposed the edit articles about people we don't know, see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You should also look at WP:Edit warring and WP:BRD. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:57, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite the opposite. C.Fred is an administrator who has no ties (at least, not in the last 160 years) to Germany or its predecessor states. I protected the page in response to the amount of editing, particularly involving unregistered editors, that violates the Manual of Style and has other problems. —C.Fred (talk) 17:10, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

text: To facilitate debate, I have flagged the unsourced material rather than delete it. (Although, any editor is free to delete unsourced material in a BLP.) I also addressed some of the style and grammar issues. —C.Fred (talk) 17:20, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: To C Fred

message: The articles used as "citation" are old and intented to mislead readers. The NY Court dismissed all claims.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.184.96.169 (talk) 08:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Then provide new articles that cover the dismissal, so we can add to the article. —C.Fred (talk) 11:15, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

text: Sorry, we can't just take your word that the case was dismissed. —C.Fred (talk) 19:25, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of old articles 

message: Text concerning von Bismark's marriage, alcohol problems and debts has been removed as unsourced. There has been quite some discussion about this in the Teahouse and if I remember I'll post a link here for posterity once it's been archived.  did suggest there an alternative form of wording and some more reliable sources, but when I tried to turn this into a paragraph that conformed throughout to WP:BLP I ran aground and lost interest. Nick Levine (talk) 18:14, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Link to teahouse discussion: Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1138#Content dispute at Carl von Bismarck Nick Levine (talk) 12:37, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriage, alcohol problems and debts removed as unsourced

message: Just to let people know that someone claiming to be von Bismarck's wife is now making legal threats off-Wiki about the section above and previous edits. Fundamentally the topic doesn't interest me at all, so I will probably now wander elsewhere in search of a quieter life. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 09:39, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legal threats 

message: A series of editors are posting unsourced and defamatory content systematically and deleting reliable content. Supra75521 (talk) 00:09, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Many of said disruptive editors also have a conflict of interest with von Bismarck. Many of them also, like the account above, are single-purpose accounts focusing solely on von Bismarck. —C.Fred (talk) 15:37, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalized page