lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Larissa Aurora

message: She's famous for her reality shows, so why can't she have her own page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krcole27 (talk • contribs) 23:19, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: * Reality show contestants are not generally notable Corpx 01:32, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

text: * I disagree, I think that Larissa is a celebrity, there are tons of reality show contestants that have Wikipedia pages. For example, Tiffany "New York" Pollard.  Does that mean she shouldn't get one because she's a reality show contestant.  Also, notabilty, means that a administrator or editor can type in the person's name and get hits relating to her notarity, so if thats the case she should be allowed to have her own page.  GeorgiaPeach86 17:46, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: update RfD nomination, relisted today (24 April) ToadetteEdit! 18:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: * Pppery * it has begun... 19:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 24 April 2024 

message: When I go to the page "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larissa_Aurora", without using "&redirect=no", I'm not automatically redirected. Does anyone know how to fix this problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Game2Winter (talk • contribs) 04:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The redirect isn't working 

message: When I go to the link "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larissa_Aurora", instead of being redirected, I see the following:https://imgur.com/a/oSNMPh6Please fix the broken redirect. Game2Winter (talk) 23:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: , the redirect is not broken. As the notice says, it is currently at WP:RFD. It's standard practice to stop the hard redirect while discussion is in progress so that users of the redirect can be made aware of the discussion. Liu1126 (talk) 11:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 15 May 2024
Talk:Photosynthetically active radiation

message: This article states that leaves are green because light at wavelengths >= that of green light does not carry enough energy for photosynthesis and because plants reflect, rather than absorb, the useless wavelengths.  The article then goes on to state that red light is one of the most important for plants.  This contradicts the earlier statement since red light has the longest wavelength of any color in the visible spectrum.
The conflicting statements from the article:
*Photons at longer wavelengths do not carry enough energy to allow photosynthesis to take place, and plants have developed, through billions of years of evolution, the capacity to scatter these photons away, hence the very high reflectance and transmittance of live green leaves.
*Chlorophyll, the most abundant plant pigment, is most efficient in capturing red and blue light. Horticulturists say that blue light is the most important for leaf growth and that red light encourages flowering.
PHaze 23:27, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photosynthetically useful wavelengths

message: I would think that PAR should refer to any wavelengths that organisms are able to use to photosynthesise and not just wavelengths that plants use. Currently the article states that organisms other than plants use near-infrared to photosynthesise - this must also be PAR. Shall I change it or is there a reason for the distinction? Smartse (talk) 15:28, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just plants? 

message: I agree. The article even speaks of "spectral range of solar light from 400 to 700 nanometers that is useful to terrestrial plants". This is a mistake. Cyanobacteria (these are bacteria, not plants, and they mostly occur in water) also have PAR. From John T.O. Kirk (1983) "Light and photosynthesis in aquatic ecosystems", Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, page 26:
"Photosynthetically available radiation (commonly abbreviated to PAR), 400-700 nm, [...]"
Kirk's book is about the aquatic environment. Note that here the abbreviation stands for something slightly different.
Another nice text involving PAR and aquatic organisms that are not plants:
limno.fcien.edu.uy/pdf/fito2008/clase1/Stomp-pigments.adaptative.diversityNature2004.pdf
Please change the text, Smartse.
OpenScience (talk) 15:28, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any photosynthesizing organism 

message: Can someone include mention of PBAR (Plant Biologically Active Radiation) in the article? I don't know where or when the term originated, but this an example of an article that mentions it: http://aip.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1063/1.4941224 . I've also seen it in presentations and terminology pages in horticulture. After that, it can be added to the Pbar disambiguation page. --Zom-B (talk) 09:30, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  PBAR 

message: References 7 and 8 are the same paper, and the last section sounds a bit self-promoting. --Radio89 (talk) 15:52, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  reference duplicate
Talk:Radziłów

message: The Polish investigation by the Institute of National Remembrance was suspended, not concluded in 2010. There was no "findings", because in law, findings are conclusions as to matters of facts arrived at through testimony heard before the court. However, the new edits as of 24 April 2011 indicate, that in fact conclusions have been drawn, which is misleading. The IPN statement makes no mention of the source for the numbers of victims, and it does not specify who the perpetrators were. Please note the passive voice in statements such as: poszukiwano ukrywających się Żydów... zabijano... pozbawiono życia... etc. There's no reason to believe that the IPN announcement was based on anything more than the blanked out deposition of Menachem Finkelsztajn as discussed by prof. Tomasz Strzembosz in his work. The cooling off period seems sufficient enough to address the problem of erroneous info and the removal of WP:RS material. — Matalea (talk) 01:19, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: 24 April 2011 section blanking and removal of reliable sources

message: "8 local Polish perpetrators were tried in Polish courts after the war" <-- Is that from Bender or from USHMM? Volunteer Marek (talk) 16:21, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It is clearly cited to USHMM at the end of the passage run. Bender also discusses a trial of the boy who set the barn alight (and gives details). The relevant USHMM passage is .Icewhiz (talk) 16:26, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification needed
Talk:Eastern Mennonite Seminary

message: I'm thinking of doing this, let me know what you think. If no one objects, I'll just go ahead and do it since I think it's a rather stubby article -- understandable since it's just a graduate theological division of an institution of higher education. I already moved all the relevant information, links, and categories to EMU. Weigh in! Aepoutre 23:29, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect to EMU?
Talk:Różanystok

message: The following is unsourced:
* A wooden home that still stands in the southwest quadrant of the village is reputed to have been built as the summer residence of a sister of Nicholas II of Russia.
* The exposed roots of a tree in the village's small forest are maintained by the village's children, who leave coins, food and flowers as presents for gnomes believed to live nearby.
If this information is important, can we please get sources and have the material incorporated into the main article itself? - Tbsdy lives (talk) 22:25, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material 
Talk:Wizna

message: Any Polish official run away or was imprisoned/deported. Who was The Polish mayor ?Xx236 (talk) 08:40, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Polish mayor ?
Talk:Basus War

message: The article's sole citation appears to not exist; per Wikipedia, the author died in 1987, which does not exactly preclude the existence of such a work but makes it rather unlikely.  [Jawad Ali] also maybe gives a 1954 date for Ali's book (whose title doesn't appear to include the word "detailed", although perhaps instead that is the date of an article about the book. 100.33.52.231 (talk) 19:10, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad cite 

message: The article writing style seems suspiciously close to the writing style of Chat GPT. Ashiqilahi123 (talk) 09:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  AI text
Talk:Raveau

message: I'd recommend to remove that non-essential link  from the introduction section, and move it to the footnotes dept. It may not be in agreement with the Wikipedia guidelines. greg park avenue 23:37, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tips from the East Coast (démographique ~ 71,400,000)

message: How is a village in France with less than 1000 inhabitants merit an entry in Wikipedia?  Did something notable happen in the village? Callelinea 22:09, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You'll want to take that question up with the geography folks who set the standards for geography articles.  Rklawton 23:12, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?
Talk:Kozy

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Largest village in Poland. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 19#Largest village in Poland until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 16:45, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Largest village in Poland" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Blizna, Subcarpathian Voivodeship

message: This is not bunker in Blizna on picture. This place is in Ocieka, about 5km from Blizna. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.244.156.134 (talk) 09:29, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You're absolutely right - my mistake, Thank's for pointing that out, I've corrected it now. :-)  01:52, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bowles v. Russell

message: This is a new article.  It is not finished yet.
The interesting part of this case was that the judge allowed an appeal and gave them a deadline, which was 17 days later.  However, the law states a 14 day limit.  The appeal was filed after 16 days but the prosecutor successfully got the appeal thrown out citing the 14 day deadline.  Justice Souter called this "bait and switch". VK35 23:50, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Czaszyn

message: How was it that this village was founded in 1450, but was part of Poland during the period 966 to 1018? Greenshed 18:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:   and 1340 - 1772 (Ruthenian Voivodeship) !
I removed some confusing references to Polish history. There are some English grammar problems, I'll work on this.GaryGo (talk) 17:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Karlików

message: Corrected false information previously written about the village history.  The village was not burned down by UPA.  It was burned by agents of PKWN (Polish communist army) as part of Akcja Wisla and related deportation operations targeting Ukrainians in Southeast Poland.  Corinna Caudill (talk) 04:27, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Charlie Brooker's Screenwipe

message: This article has problems with nreferenced POV statements based on original research about the program - this not appropriate for an encyclopedia. For instance, the way "Unsarcastic/Complimentary" section suggests that sincere praise for TV shows is very rare on Screenwipe - there is an (I think stronger) OR case to be made that Charlie Brooker's sincere praise is much more common.  Another example of a problematic line: "Screenwipe can be characterised as being intellectually harsher, however, with Brooker often making over-the-top — and slightly unbalanced — moral comparisons between the seeming attitude of certain programmes, and the logical conclusions of that attitude if it were turned towards real life." 207.151.252.32 (talk) 22:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV/OR tags

message: Too lazy to fix it myself, the spoof voiceover is at the end of season 3, not 2.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.224.198.71 (talk) 23:44, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Massively increased buget" 

message: The German "copy" of Charlie Brooker's Screenwipe, the show "Walusis sieht fern" was rewarded with a Grimme Award 2012 (entertainment)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.185.249.142 (talk) 21:26, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grimme Award for German ripoff
Talk:Płonna, Podkarpackie Voivodeship

message: I made some corrections to the article.  It's still very much a stub, and more information will be available soon.  It's important to note that this was a Lemko village prior to post World War II Polish/Soviet ethnic cleansing campaigns which resulted in the forcible deportation of all Lemkos (most considered themselves to be Ukrainian) living in the village.  Corinna Caudill (talk) 04:11, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Monumental Sports Network

message: added channel availability infojb 21:20, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  availability 
Talk:Anton Jones

message: Who keeps on adding this stuff about Anton Jones being a god? It has nothing to do with this Anton Jones  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.26.238.99 (talk) 04:55, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jacques du Broeucq

message: If you have notably more information than is currently provided in the note at Giambologna, by all means create a full-scale article for Jacques du Broeucq. If not, keep in mind that Wikipedia is not a mere directory of artists, broken down into individual two-line entries.  --Wetman 00:00, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Some rush in where angels fear to tread, apparently. All that's been added to the footnote at Giambologna is a photo with a copyright inscription right on it. --Wetman (talk) 10:11, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A redirect to [[Giambologna]]
Talk:Nyaminyami

message: This article appears to be about a noteworthy people and their cultural beliefs. However:
* It is not written in an encyclopedic tone;
* it is unreferenced;
* it doesn't link to anywhere, so the context is hard to grasp; and
* the style and layout may imply that this is taken from another source, which may (or may not) raise copyright issues.
I will make some changes to the article in a little while, but would be interested in anyone else's views on the above. Euryalus 00:01, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone of this article 

message: Since the article's new intro makes this an article about Nyaminyami, and not just about one specific legend about it (him? her?), should we move this article to Nyaminyami? --Alvestrand 21:18, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Nyaminyami?
Talk:Nsibidi

message: I think the article needs some better sourcing for the very early claim.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.254.31.36 (talk) 16:01, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree it gives no solid evedence, and shouldn't say so without it.--J intela (talk) 11:53, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  4000-5000 BC or at least 170AD: that's one hell of a range 

message: The neutrality dispute can be found here: Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Nsibidi.2C_Igbo_language.2C_Efik_language. Ukabia - talk 21:15, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  August 2011 dispute 

message: So why are the majority not being recorded? --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 00:04, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "There are thousands of nsibidi symbols, of which over 500 have been recorded"? 
Talk:Zboiska, Sanok County

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Dana boomer (talk) 01:29, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The initial cleanup edits were in February 2012, with additional cleaning done today. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Silar. Dana boomer (talk) 01:29, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Shopping Centers/Archive Jul 2007

message: An apparent SPA, using also added articles about a number of small shopping centers ("power centers")  in the Atlanta area. The individual small shopping centers have been appropriately removed by speedy, but the editor who removed them has also tried to remove the Surry Center article, which is a probably notable mall be speedy--& when speedy was rejected, almost all the content was removed, and the article has been nominated for AfD  which may or may not be appropriate. The article certainly does need information about size etc, and also a reference or two.    
:And the same editor placed a speedy on the major regional center , Atlanta Mall; this was obviously a little absurd, & I removed it, but it is also nominated for deletion at AfD . This article too needs sources and some more content.
DGG 16:48, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: over-eager additions and deletions

message: Just dropping a line to let everyone know that List of shopping malls in the United States is at Articles for Deletion. Offer your opinion at that discussion if you want. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 01:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of shopping malls in the United States]]

message: We appear to have achieved general consensus on Wikipedia:WikiProject Shopping Centers/Anchors and tenants, so I have removed the draft header from that page. When the discussion here left off, we were waiting for any comments that DGG and/or Metallic95 may have in response to revisions made to address their comments -- any further discussions can occur at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Shopping Centers/Anchors and tenants.  BTW, if anyone can come up with a pithier "nutshell" description, please do.  
It appears that we can now cite WP:OR, WP:V and WP:ANCHORS when faced with unsourced anchor lists, and WP:NOT and WP:TENANTS when dealing with endless tenant directories.  Skeezix1000 14:09, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a good thing to have. I hate crufty tenant lists with a vengance! If a given shopping centre is just the sum of the tenants then it shouldn't have a wikipedia article.Garrie 22:22, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: By the way, I've added WP:ANC to make a shorter shortcut for the anchor store essay.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:33, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Anchors and tenants
Talk:Kołbacz

message: Hi. I'm looking for an image of the abbey church for Brick Romanesque. There's none on commons. Can someone add one? athinaios (talk) 18:06, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abbey Church 

message: Ok, even if this person is "wiki-notable" is he notable enough to include in this article? Aren't there other people that could be included?VolunteerMarek 04:36, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karl-Ludwig Barths
Talk:The First (musical)

message: This page needs to be renamed to simply "The First", I'll try to do it now. (There is already a separate talk page for "The First (musical)").JeanColumbia (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh, oh, now this page needs to be renamed "The First (musical)", here goes!JeanColumbia (talk) 16:26, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Old discussion about page move

message: Can any one add a plot synopsis and anything about the background/history or critical reaction?  Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:17, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Synopsis/critical reaction
Talk:Dynów

message: I added on Nazi German atrocitites including categories as this happened in Polish town during Polish administration and concerns Polish citizens.--Molobo (talk) 14:12, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I added on Nazi German atrocitites 

message: Tzvi Elimelech Spira of Dinov 212.199.168.232 (talk) 15:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  add approx
Talk:Miller Park Zoo

message: I just cleaned things up a very little bit.  I included a reference section, neatened up the exhibits an the one external link.  Until someone can get more information from some source (the zoo's website has very little), this article may not be able to be taken much further. LonelyBeacon (talk) 03:14, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Hello, I'm not sure if anyone will read this, but I'm trying to find out more about who the farmer was. The page states "The zoo was started when a circus lion cub ended up on a farmer's farm around 1900, and was eventually given to the city of Bloomington." However, it doesn't mention the name of the farmer or anything about them. According to family legend, the land was owned by my ancestor, Samuel Miller (FamilySearch), with the park being named in his honor. However, I'm unable to confirm that. I don't want to add it to FamilySearch in case it isn't accurate. If someone could point me in the right direction for where that information on the Wikipedia page came from, I'd be most appreciative. Thank you. I'd like to note, this isn't really a 'discussion' insomuch as it is a place for me to keep track of information that I got from Wikipedia edit history, interviews, etc. I want to have this place because I'd also like to record on the page itself who the famer was.  69.174.173.120 (talk) 03:45, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm back again. The part about the unknown farmer was added by "DJ Jay08" on December 27, 2008. According to his user page, he works (as of 2008) at the "local zoo," so presumably Miller Park. However, he does not link his sources, or they have expired. 69.174.173.120 (talk) 04:00, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unknown Farmer
Talk:Józefów, Biłgoraj County

message: I suggest moving the Józefów massacre to its own page; it's certainly well-documented enough for that, and would mirror other pages on Holocaust events.
TypistMonkey (talk) 20:11, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Józefów Massacre
Talk:Prophecies about Joan of Arc

message: i propose that this article could be merged into Joan of Arc, maybe under a new section titled "Prophecies". or this article could just be merged into Joan of Arc, without the new section stuff. Realmaxxver (talk) 15:13, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  Dan Bloch (talk) 17:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into Joan of Arc
Talk:U.S. Department of Justice Office of Special Counsel

message: This article ought to explain how this office, the "U.S. Department of Justice Office of Special Counsel", is different from the now-defunct "Office of Independent Counsel" and the current "U.S. Office of Special Counsel". As it stands, it's pretty confusing. Does this new office avoid the problems raised in Morrison v. Olson? --Hyphen5 00:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled