Talk:Engineering physics

message: The article claims that Eng phys is a fairly new degree. Is this true? I was under the impression that eng phys degrees had been around since the 50s. -Lommer | talk 01:09, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newer claim 

message: Ok this has been bugging me for a bit. Does anyone else think it's odd that we're listing every single school that offers eng phys? Not only is this list horrendously incomplete, I don't think it's neccesary. I could see it if there were only two or three schools worldwide that offered eng phys, but as it stands right now its as if we listed every school that offers aerspace engineering or even mechanincal engineering. Does anyone else think we should remove the list? -Lommer | talk 21:23, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course universities where the program is "notable" could be listed. Of course this would again boil down to it being really hard to neutrally decide where it is "notable". The list is right now a mess, if notthing else it should atleast be in correct alphabetical order.Gillis 15:10, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of schools 

message: Hey, it could be a good idea to list terms for engineering physics in a few different languages, for instance in many european countries engineering physics is in the form of "techincal physics"(Swedish, Finnish and german(?) atleast).
Also it could be noted that studying EP only to B.Sc. is the american way, eg. in finland where i study EP it is studied unti M.Sc., allthough the studies are done in the same way (after B.Sc. you specialize in something) but the degree is still called in a way that is translatable to M.Sc. in EP.
Gillis 23:28, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  International terms 

message: The Spanish article could be useful in order to improve this one.Nicoguaro (talk) 01:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanish article 

message: An image used in this article, File:DiamondSynchrotron.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:33, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:DiamondSynchrotron.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Engineering physics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120226032135/http://www.princeton.edu:80/EngineeringPhysics/introduction.html to http://www.princeton.edu/EngineeringPhysics/introduction.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:25, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Why is social science listed as an branch of engineering physics?
To show how questionable this is, might as well add economics, political science, history and so on.Magonz (talk) 14:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It isn't. The list of branches does not contain "social science." It is listed as among the disciplines that combine to form engineering physics. Whether it belongs on that list is another matter, but it explicitly is not listed as a "branch" of engineering physics. --OuroborosCobra (talk) 20:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social science 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Physikalische Technik and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 12#Physikalische Technik until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  ~~~~User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 01:59, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Physikalische Technik" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The current version of this article uses engineering physics as synonym for engineering science. However, Engineering physics is only a subset of engineering science. Other branches of engineering science include engineering chemistry. Juanrga (talk) 11:39, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engineering science 

message: — Assignment last updated by Lzepeda12 (talk) 21:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: 4A Wikipedia assignment