lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1990 Brazilian Grand Prix

message: Reviewing the video the three cars involved are Alesi, who lightly taps de Cesaris, because he is being squeezed from the other side by Patrese. Nannini at the time is about 5 car lengths behind the event close up on the back right wheel of a Ligier. However I have no source to confirm this other than video, which as far as I know I cant really use as a source on wikipedia {:-(
82.13.35.10 (talk) 11:52, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nannini not involved in first corner
Talk:Pathologic

message: Is steampunk really an accurate descriptor for Pathologic? OsmiumTrioxide (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 08:43, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , reliable sources barley ever referred to it as such and the claim was not given in the article. I removed the category for now. Regards, IceWelder [✉] 08:50, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding game category 

message: I felt that Eli Goren, the games art director ought to be included with Dashina in the artists section of the infobox but when I go to edit it the field for artists and roles other than director aren’t there. Is this an issue other people are experiencing or is there something I’m missing? Haruspicus (talk) 15:08, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The infobox gets that data from Wikidata; autoconfirmed users will see an edit icon on the infobox that links to the appropriate property, but you should still be able to edit it without that permission.  You'll need to create a new item for Eli Goren (unless  is the same person or there's already an item by a Cyrillic name that I can't find), and then add that item to . (Some instructions on how to create an item that can be found at d:Wikidata:Tours, d:Help:Modelling/Other_domains#People, and d:Wikidata:Living people; there also might be some more specific guidance that I haven't found.) --Pokechu22 (talk) 23:58, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can’t make changes to artist section of infobox? 

message: The Gameplay or Plot section could benefit from being formatted similar to how the Russian version of this article is, in regards to there being dot points for each of the three characters, which proivde descriptions for each one. NOKO444 (talk) 00:41, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding character descriptions
Talk:Quantum Gate

message: concerning articles :1:Quantum gate, 2:Quantum Gate and 3:Quantum Gate (PC game)
previously, 3 redirected to 2 which held the info about the game, which i thought was very confusing, as it was clear to me that 2 should redirect to 1, with 3 holding the information about the game, so i moved the game information from 2 to 3, and redirected 2 to one, this will be coppied on the other two articles' talk page 193.60.83.241 (talk) 11:47, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Quantum gate (PC game) confusion
Talk:Mary Stanton

message: Beaufort and  company 
You missed out on that series in her books. http://marystanton.com/angels/116/mary-stantons-beaufort-company-mysteries
The love that lasts?
 Are you sure its from the same person since she never mentioned it or was it banned or something?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.126.81.24 (talk) 12:04, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:English cricketers of 1946 to 1968

message: What is the significance of 1968?--Brownlee 14:41, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was the last season in which the County Championship was the predominant domestic competition.  In 1969, the Sunday (now National) League began and caused a reduction in championship matches; they were further reduced in 1972 when the B&H Cup began.  1969 was in effect the start of the limited overs era.  --BlackJack | talk page 15:03, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough; thanks.--Brownlee 13:28, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Hippocampus (mythology)

message: I have cleaned away links that are irrelevant to the subject at hand, which is Hippocamp. I hope that won't seem too disciplined. Not every noun in a text need be blue-linked, simply to emphasize words. If we think of the Wikipedia reader, who needs to pick out the relevant links, or ones that will explain terms, we'll sense that "tree" and "sea" and "bronze" don't need linking here, interesting as each phenomenon may be. --Wetman 14:42, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I have noticed that the text uses noth "hippocamps" and "hippocampi" as plural form interchangeably. Although both are correct, I suggest deciding on one form as to not confuse the reader. Plus, one could take "hippocampoi" to be correct also, from "ἱπποκαμποι",  the correct Greek plural. Wethertisnobler (talk) 20:46, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hippocamp Plural 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support Sounds reasonable. I don't think I've ever heard this term. --BDD (talk) 17:30, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Any additional comments:
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
its big 3m  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.249.178.107 (talk) 11:23, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:One-cushion billiards

message: I don’t know why it says there is a point deduction in case no object ball is hit. This is not the case for any official carom discipline. Hoegholm (talk) 08:42, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  No point deduction exists
Talk:Montagne Sainte-Victoire

message: Why not "Mont Sainte-Victoire"? Surely this is far more common? Johnbod 18:37, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Montagne is more common, though arguably not correct. But everyone says la montagne sainte victoire...Zigzig20s 18:49, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

text: In French, locally, perhaps. But Cezanne's paintings are always described as of "Mont" SV, which suggests that is what should be used in WP. Johnbod 19:52, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Basically, 'Mont' is arguably more correct because some say it is not high enough to be a mountain. But I really don't think Cézanne should have his last say on the whole thing, so to speak. There is more to the Sainte-Victoire than just Cézanne.Zigzig20s 04:37, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

text: WP policy is to use the most commonly used term in English; it didn't help that the article did not even have a redirect from "Mont" - I had great difficulty finding it. Mont is used in other contexts in English also - I had never heard Montagne before. That would of course keep a redirect. I think there should be a poll. Johnbod 14:32, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Does anyone have pictures of the infamous 1989 fire? That would be interesting to see...Zigzig20s 05:59, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1989 fire pictures? 

message: Image:Mont Sainte Victoire 2.jpg|Panoramic view of the Montagne Sainte-Victoire.
This is a composite panoramic view that gives a pretty good impression of the mountain.  How about it?  - Benzband (talk) 19:45, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panoramic view 
Talk:Stuck Mojo

message: ----Strident (loud, harsh, grating, or shrill; discordant) is a judgement.  I am replacing with "strong".  Even that is pushing it.  The band has stated they have nothing against moderate Islam. 12.10.223.247 00:54, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

message: The Mark Jenkins quote doesn't make any sense. Rage Against the Machine also heavily criticized the Democratic party (protested at a DNC for one). Being anti-Clinton does not make one the opposite of leftist. Also, the same song Jenkins mentioned criticizes the "crooked figurehead" for adopting a Republican foreign policy. I think my main problem is the current sentence " Mark Jenkins of The Washington Post noted the conservative viewpoint..." reads as if there really is a conservative viewpoint, whereas this is really a poorly-supported conclusion of a journalist. If no one disagrees, I'll play with the tone while keeping in the quote.
--Tekhnofiend (talk) 04:14, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Mark Jenkins quote?
Talk:Path integration

message: The usual problem with these kind of descriptions is that sometimes some terms are not properly defined. I take the sentences
...is information from the vestibular organs, which detect movement in the three dimensions. 
Together, these sources of information can tell the animal which direction it is moving, at what speed, and for how long.
* Probably the word movement, should be accelerations, since inertial sensors can only measure accelerations, that is changes in the state of motion, not the state of motion itself.
* direction, speed, how long are relative terms. Accepting that direction may be easy to measure and that internal biological clocks can provide a good estimation of how long. The term speed remains undefined. Is it velocity respect to what? The word speed makes not sense unless a reference is given. User:Kakila  —Preceding undated comment added 09:25, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frame of Reference
Talk:Sheldon Adelson

message: Four times now, someone has added unsourced information claiming that Adelson had a son by a woman he had a relationship with. The person adding the information claims to be that son.  User:BostonCasinoKid, please do not add this material to the article. You can, if you wish, come here to the talk page and explain why you want to add this information and what kind of sources we can use to support it. -- MelanieN (talk) 19:19, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced additions from someone claiming to be Adelson's son 

message: I think that only the information that she has an MD, her previous marriage, and her children are relevant to this article since she has her own article that contains all the other information (and that is obvious from her name in blue here as a link, which it should be regardless of if it is linked elsewhere, so that those interested in her can click from there.)
=== Was it the same uncle both times? === 
This passage: "He began his business career at the age of 12 when he borrowed $200 from his uncle (equivalent to $3,010 in 2021) and purchased a license to sell newspapers in Boston.[26] In 1948, at the age of 15, he borrowed $10,000 (equivalent to $112,784 in 2021) from his uncle to start a candy vending-machine business."  Was it the same uncle both times or were two different creditor/uncles involved? Either way, it should say so, no?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.79.210.190 (talk) 02:45, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove extra information regarding his widow since she has her own article 

message: This passage: "He began his business career at the age of 12 when he borrowed $200 from his uncle (equivalent to $3,010 in 2021) and purchased a license to sell newspapers in Boston.[26] In 1948, at the age of 15, he borrowed $10,000 (equivalent to $112,784 in 2021) from his uncle to start a candy vending-machine business."  Was it the same uncle both times or were two different creditor/uncles involved? Either way, it should say so, no?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.79.210.190 (talk) 02:45, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was it the same uncle both times?
Talk:Dorothy Bussy

message: I have a problem with saying that Bussy's novel Olivia was published by Virginia Woolf.  Ms. Woolf died in 1941, and so could publish nothing at the time Olivia was printed.
I think it is much better to say something along the lines that Olivia was published by Hogarth press, the publishing house established by Leonard and Virginia Woolf.
What do others think? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lsisson (talk • contribs) 02:35, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Olivia, Published by Leonard Woolf and Virginia Woolf 

message: I can’t seem to find a reliable source on Dorothy Bussy’s affair with Ottoline Morrell. Apttoget (talk) 22:06, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship with Ottoline Morrell?
Talk:Saint-Maximin-la-Sainte-Baume

message: The photo of the basilica has had the words "Conservative 13th century..." attached like a wart on its nose. Everywhere this photo of the building goes, its name is preceded by the words "Conservative 13th century..."! Why? 
Someone had inserted the pic into the article Gothic architecture and written a blurb about its "conservative" style under the photo in a section about "decoration"! 
The point is, it is not "conservative 13th century Gothic" and it doesn't show a strong backward association with the Romanesque, as otherwhere stated. So I tracked down the details. 
Aha! It wasn't begun until 1295! It is only just 13th century! The building program appears to have continued, despite interruptions, to the original scheme. It was built mainly in the 14th century. 
So it is indeed a conservative building to have been erected in the 14th, not the 13th, century.
However, the adjective "conservative" is just one of many that could become a permanent accretion on this magnificent edifice. And it is a virtually meaingless adjective unless the reader wishes to do a detailed analysis of architectural style. Let's try "majestic" instead, or is that too POV? ... ! 
--Amandajm 05:09, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Magnificent" is as uninformative as "fabulous!" would be and doesn't accurately characterise a building almost without enrichments, one that is specifically "conservative in taste and sublime in effect". Rather than simply substitute one's own effusions, why not find an evocative quote and note the source in a footnote. --Wetman 05:33, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basilica of Saint Mary Magdalene 
Talk:Belgium–Luxembourg Economic Union

message: As all the points listed have been replaced or abolished by the EU, what did the new 2002 convention actually contain? And how does that relate to the Benelux and the EU?- J Logan t: 22:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What is it now

message: "The original treaty lasted for fifty years, expiring in 1972; this was extended for ten years in 1982 and again in 1992. On 18 December 2002, the two countries and the three regions of Belgium signed a new convention." What about the ten years between 1972 and 1982? According to this the treaty expired in 1972 and then 10 years later was extended from 1982 to 1992 and again from 1992 to 2002 before being replaced by a new convention in 2002. How could it have been extended in 1982 when it had supposedly expired ten years earlier? --Khajidha (talk) 00:44, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Check the math
Talk:Jane Bowles

message: Is there any truth to the rumours that she was poisoned which caused her "stroke" in 1957? Opiumjones 23 (talk) 00:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: poisoned

message: Jane Bowles deserves a rather more academic page than this. It smacks of the pr her husband's circle have maintained. the lady deserves better. Her writing and life is and was far more interesting than this page reflects. Her lesbianism etc have been ignored. Her  husband Paul Bowles marriage despite his sexuality and his murder attempt etc.   i will research and provide some sources. Opiumjones 23 (talk) 00:45, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Your foolish comments will probably scare any serious biographer away from this page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 (talk) 16:29, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: This page misrepresents the subject

message: I only added a footnote to info an anon user had correctly added. Plus added the reasoning given in Michelle Greenes's book that she was driven to it by her husband's interest in Yacoubi. as ref 
see
Opiumjones 23 (talk) 00:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Re deletion by BKLisenbee and his comment

message: The article says that just before her death: "Her health continued to decline, despite various treatments in England and the United States, until she had to be admitted to a clinic in Málaga, Spain.
"...until she had to be admitted to a clinic in Málaga, Spain"? Why did she "have to" be admitted and what happened there that cured her, since it says her health deteriorated, despite various efforts, "until..."?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.126.150.30 (talk) 04:00, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not sure what to make of this 

message: Please would an interested editor assess the material added at User:Cybulskia3/sandbox, incorporate what is useful, blank that page as WP:COPYARTICLE, and leave a note here when done? – Fayenatic London 22:24, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abandoned user draft 
Talk:Polly Adler

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article.-- Jreferee 22:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I have heard repeatedly in my research that Adler's autobiography A House is Not a Home was ghostwritten by Robert Condon.  Can anyone provide a cite for the Virginia Faulkner claim in the article? Monkeyzpop (talk) 22:08, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Autobiography ghost

message: I have suggested that A House Is Not a Home (book) be merged to this article because the book is not notable enough for its own article outside the context of this article. -- Mikeblas (talk) 16:13, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge 
Talk:Jean Garrigue

message: The section as it is is not encyclopedic: it does not provide a solid historical overview of her career, but is written more as a eulogy of her greatness. I suggest that the Work section give a solid overview of her publishing career. I will move most of the current content to a new section on Reception, which is a more appropriate title for what we currently have. Best, Aristophanes68 (talk) 05:49, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work section needs lots of work
Talk:American Me

message: The film basis part reads like an essay that someone wrote, including cliff notes and personal opinions... Replacing it with a regular movie summary that someone can add to. 
It needs a better plot summary.
Here it says Olmos applied for and was granted a concealed weapons permit; if you look up the Mexican Mafia it says the permit was denied? What's the truth? What else in the article is false? --Freepablo 08:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I placed that info in the article at one time and I think I had a source for that.  I'll do some research and see what is going on.  Can you please place a reference about what you mentioned.  If the info came from a web site, well do they have a neutral source re that piece of information. Let's not jump into hasty generalizations about the article from one potential problem area.  We'll get it straight.  Off to dinner, and I'll work on it when I return.   Oh yes, when writing on the TALK page good grammar is expected.Luigibob (talk) 00:51, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs major editing

message: He spent 18 years in prison but he's adjusting to 30 years being absent from society?  How is 30 = 18  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.245.213.213 (talk) 14:34, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doesn't make sense 

message: Pointing out that the person who character Santana is based on tried to steer the real La Eme gang into "left wing activism", and "unsuccessfully", seems a bit hyperbolic, and totally unnecessary to a film synopsis or even the background of a film.  Nowhere in the film are La Eme's political leanings, that don't directly involve prison gang business, discussed.  So why would they be discussed in the film's background?  La Eme not having killed the person Santana is based upon, and another prison gang killing him instead, is indeed relevant.  The reasons as to why, which are not germane to any part of the film, however, are not.  Such content would seem more relevant on the La Eme gang's own wikipedia page, not on a fictional film's page that is only loosely based on the gang, and which doesn't cover the politics of the gang in the slightest.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.208.98.232 (talk) 07:37, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real EME's political leanings, necessary to a film synopsis?   
Talk:2007 O'Byrne Cup

message: ==Untitled==
Who did DCU beat in the prelim round? (Gnevin 15:32, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DCU

message: Who did DCU beat in the prelim round? (Gnevin 15:32, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Marjorie Garber

message: Why is her name given as Marjorie Long?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RJTeeter (talk • contribs) 05:06, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name?
Talk:Brignoles

message: Can anybody subsantiate Mariette Delangle ran a Bugatti at this or any other French GP in '31?  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  17:05, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Oh Hellé
Talk:Muriel Rukeyser

message: What does her being bisexual have to do with her literary accomplishments? 2600:6C60:6A7F:A6E3:80F0:7192:DBC7:8E71 (talk) 20:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does her being bisexual have to do with her literary accomplishments? 

message: https://murielrukeyser.emuenglish.org/2021/06/02/bill-rukeyser-interviewed-by-dennis-bernstein-february-16-2021-kpfa-flashpoints/https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5896df3559cc68bf0460617a/t/5c033cd9032be408b0cf6ef2/1543716073045/Tor+House+Newsletter+2018.pdf
https://lithub.com/yearning-for-my-grandmother-muriel-rukeyser-and-grappling-with-her-legacy/
A google search will turn up more sites I was not able to access. Readingpro256 talk to me contribs 21:10, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  rukeyser's son
Talk:Asian Formula Three Championship

message: This article has now received a major re-write and expansion, with additional research. It would still benefit from citations in a couple of areas (which have been tagged accordingly). I have provisionally opted for a B-class rating, as there is not much more to add to it. Adrian M. H. 20:39, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Draguignan

message: In the climate section, the table gives units as h/year and d/year. I think it would be worth spelling out as (presumably) house per year and days per year, but that can't be the case with rain. I suspect Draguignan doesn't get 734 days of rain per calendar year, would this be millimetre's per year instead? Richard Nevell (talk) 20:06, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate units
Talk:United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America

message: Throughout the article, the union is praised — it is "highly regarded", its structure is held up as more democratic than others (the implication of being better than others is obvious), others are depicted as wasting tons of money on executive salaries, its bargaining is wonderfully careful at investigating grievances, it's standing up for the rights of workers being oppressed day-to-day by the eeevil employers, it was the only group to fight against stark bigotry (which "placed UE far ahead of other unions"), and it's fighting for the rights of government workers who lack the "right" to strike against the public interest, anywhere, anytime.  Nyttend (talk) 15:04, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag 

message: There are currently indicated a couple of affiliations, these appear to need updating.
From the infobox: affiliation= ICEM, PSI
ICEM no longer exists, merged into IndustriALL Global Union. IndustriALL does seem to indicate UE to be affiliated. However, PSI does not list UE as an affiliate. I was unable to spot anything in article text explaining these affiliations. The only UE-created list I've yet managed to find is ambiguous on whether these are actually affiliations or a looser connection. djr13 (talk) 17:20, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Federations 

message: This article is shameless propaganda from start to finish and ought to be deleted. Intelligent Mr Toad 2 (talk) 23:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Propaganda