Talk:American Jewish Committee

message: How come this is categorized under antisemitism?
68.150.86.20 23:51, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it fights/opposes antisemitism. The encyclopedic categorization merely indicates a "topic." It is like the case of a war: you mention both sides, not only whom you think are the "good guys." Yours truly,--Ludvikus 12:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[AJC]] vs. [[Antisemitism]]

message: The reference to AJCongress appears at the head of the AJCommittee article.  My edit was an attempt to make the two articles paralel in this regard. I'll refrain from further editing until we reach a consensus on how to make these two entries parallel. 207.197.214.38 19:33, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  AJCongress and AJCommittee 

message: Most of this entry is laundry lists of ex-presidents and departments, which seem to be copied from the AJC's web site. Can somebody write something about what the AJC has done since 1907? They were a liberal organization for most of their 100 years. What did they do? Weren't they involved in the civil rights movement in the south?
::I added some history. Rjensen (talk) 23:51, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What has the AJC done? 

message: The section is nothing but an attack on the book and contains no balance, just more anti-Zionist rhetoric.Scott Adler 18:51, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can't delete the entire "Criticism" section just because you disagree with it. 
==This section was the work of many people, who reached a consensus on it. You can add sourced material to it, but not delete it. Your deletion violates WP:NPOV and WP:NOT#CENSOR.  Nbauman 23:50, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed POV section on  “‘Progressive’ Jewish Thought and the New Anti-Semitism,”

message: There ought to be information on the AJC's interfaith activities, which are considerable.  ADM (talk) 17:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Interfaith

message: I am proposing that Unification Church antisemitism controversy by merged into this article. (I have already added some of it to the "controversy" section here.) That article is more than half about a press conference given by the AJC in 1976 and the reactions to that. Since the AJC is the subject of the article and it is only about one incident, it might as well be put here. WP does not usually have an article on a single incident like a press conference. Steve Dufour (talk) 18:01, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: However more than half the article is about the AJC's 1976 press conference. Another possibility is to expand the article with information about the church's pro-Jewish and pro-Israel positions, however this has been rejected becuase the title of the article includes the word "antisemitism." Steve Dufour (talk) 18:14, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And 100% of the article is about the UC -- making it the clearly preferable merge-target. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 18:25, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually there would be no problem to "merge" to both places. And to Divine Principle as well.Steve Dufour (talk) 18:28, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is actually, it would most probably be WP:UNDUE here -- the UC press conference is barely a blip on the AJC's 93 year history, which includes some major diplomatic victories. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 18:42, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that they are doing many good things.Steve Dufour (talk) 02:33, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

text: The AJC doesn't seem to think it's very important since they don't mention it on their website. Steve Dufour (talk) 19:06, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

text: It's actually part of the basic teachings of the church: That the suffering of the Jews, faithful Christains, and God over the last 2,000 years (including the Holocaust) are the result of the failure of Jesus' primary mission. (Divine Principle 1996 edition page 116)  No one had ever said that was antisemitic until the AJC news conference in 1976. Steve Dufour (talk) 19:03, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on American Jewish Committee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120528173423/http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?apage=1&cid=1170359796236&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull to http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?apage=1&cid=1170359796236&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: A statement in 1900-1929 flagged in 2015 as "very POV" (and also tagged as citation needed back then) needs to be justified not only for
being in the article but for being placed after mention of Judge Proskauer. The JTA obit about him doesn't make it a good idea for this "very POV" to be there... possibly not even in this article at all. BTW, it is part of text that was previously trimmed. Pi314m (talk) 05:53, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: What makes Jews foreign