lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:KISQ

message: https://radioinsight.com/headlines/172073/kesz-squats-on-breeze-branding-for-phoenix/
http://www.insideradio.com/free/iheartmedia-sacramento-brings-ac-back-to/article_afe4d74c-e38d-11e8-9990-679d567bf25a.html
https://radioinsight.com/ross/172026/why-soft-ac-is-booming-now/
https://radioinsight.com/headlines/171891/wisx-really-stunting-with-christmas-music/
https://radioinsight.com/headlines/172117/domain-insight-11-16-breezes-continuing-to-blow-in-across-the-land/
Theres Been talks recently that Iheart wants to Expand the Breeze name outside of San Francisco, Sacramento, and Philadelphia to other AC Stations owned by the company in their markets.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:640:C600:8270:8D3B:2F3:8F6E:4AA0 (talk) 16:07, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Iheart Expanding the Breeze Name outside of San Francisco
Talk:Kistler Vineyards

message: I added  to the article after the reference to http://www.thewineadvocate.com. That citation is too broad and doesn't lead me to the citation. It should be tightened up or removed.  Toddstreat1 05:54, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 100 Parker-poins, well, well... have I seen this kind of partial/misleading quotation of Parker before or not...? Wine Advocate # 132 Dec 2000: 1999 Kistler Pinot Noir Occidental Vineyard Cuvee Elizabeth (98-100). For those who are not used to deciphering Parker notes, (...) means a provisional note for a wine tasted from cask (or otherwise in an unfinished state). In these cases a wine is always given a point range. Quoting this as as a straight 100 is quite simply not correct! It seems that WA has never returned to this wine and tasted it after bottling, i.e., it has no final note. Also: less marketingspeak in this article, please. Tomas e 21:43, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it looks like I'm unable to tell the difference between Pinot Noir and Chardonnay... or perhaps I need to clean my glasses (spectacles, not wine glasses :-) )... The claim was about a 1999 Chardonnay, not Pinot Noir. I simply checked erobertparkeronline.com for a 1999 Kistler and took the highest-scoring I found, and that was the pinot mentioned above. The 1999 Kistler Chardonnay Cuvee Cathleen got a provisional note of (96-100) in Wine Advocate # 132 Dec 2000, and a final note of 97 in Wine Advocate # 142 Aug 2002. It's never correct to quote the provisional note after the final note has been given, and (96-100) is not 100, and neither is 97! I'm going to remove it. If anyone is intereted, the highest WA-rated Kistler wine is 2000 Kistler Pinot Noir Occidental Vineyard Cuvee Elizabeth which got 99 in Wine Advocate # 142 Aug 2002. No Kistler wine has ever been rated 100, according to erobertparker.com. Tomas e 22:08, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requesting quote: really need tighter reference 

message: I'm restoring the reference to the Judgement of Paris that User:Agne27 deleted and including a URL for further verification.  Toddstreat1 12:18, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoring Taber citation 

message: FWIW, there's a discussion of Kistler's notability going on over at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wine.  Toddstreat1 12:23, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion of notability 

message: Taken from a conversation on my talk page
I have doubts as to the strength of that reference to Kistler being a "leading Chardonnay" producer. The reference in Judgement of Paris is part of an after index "How to do your own JOP like tasting" guide and Kistler is mentioned almost in passing with no collaborating statements to back up the claim that they are a "leading producer of chardonnay" (Sales, production volume, range of distribution, history? etc). It seems like an unsubstantiated personal opinion and just a token mention at that. AgneCheese/Wine 22:18, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Leading Chardonnay producer
Talk:John Clipperton

message: This is a mere hypothesis, hardly supported by evidence. See this book p. 47-48. Teofilo talk 15:34, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magellan 

message: there is a rare book called early cir cum navigation's, which contains recorded ships logs, witch are extremely helpful and interesting   which  include cook  shevlock ect  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.254.76.186 (talk) 06:37, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  captain clipperton
Talk:Humayun's Tomb

message: The dimensions listed in this article are incorrect and have no citation.  Who came up with these figures?  Did you measure the building and dome with the tape measure from your grandma's sewing kit?
According to Glenn Lowry's article, "Humayun's Tomb: Form Function, and Meaning," 
"The plinth is 6.5 m. tall and
99 m. wide, and the elongated drum and double dome
of the monument tower 42.5 m. above the ground." 
According to a table on page 275 of R. Balasubramaniam's article, "On the Modular Design of Mughal Riverfront Funerary Gardens," the following are true:
1. N-S length of complex (garden) 34853.88cm.
2. E-W length of complex (garden) 34152.84cm.
3. Width of main causeway is 1264.92cm. 
4. Width of minor causeway is 518.16cm. 
5. E-W and N-S lengths of central platform is 11277.60cm. 
6. E-W and N-S lengths of second platform (the red plinth) 9326.88cm. 
7. E-W and N-S lengths of mausoleum plinth (marble base of building) 5029.20cm.
So to condense and simplify this information:
The garden is about 349m by 342m.
The main path is about 13m wide.
The side paths are about 5m wide.
The large, tan platform that the Tomb and the red plinth sit on is about 113m x 113m.
The red plinth is about 93m x 93m x 6.5m. 
The tomb's base (footprint) is about 50m x 50m. 
The tip of the dome reaches 42.5m from the tan platform (the ground).
Did I interpret this correctly? 
I did not write this article, and I will not rewrite this article, but I have been using this article as reference for a project and have become incredibly irritated and exasperated by how much of this article is inaccurate.  Somebody should at least go through and fix the citations.  
BilliTheCat (talk) 02:38, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Tomb, Tomb's Plinth, and Garden Dimensions. 

message: The Garden contains a Hammam, a Baradari, a Mosque, a grave platform, the Barber's Tomb, and the Nizamuddin Chilla.
There are 3 gates.  The West Gate, the South Gate, and the Nila Gumbad Gate.  
BilliTheCat (talk) 04:37, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Built Structures Contained within The Tomb's Wall
Talk:Jaswant Thada

message: (1) Does Jaswant Thada has actual tombs, and/or a crematorium inside it ? If so, then it is not actually a cenotaph !!
(2) If it is really a crematorium, perhaps it should be listed here:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cenotaph
Joe Gatt (talk) 20:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification request

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 07:11, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition
Talk:John Clements Wickham

message: Originally a supporter of Captain Hugh Fitzroy (initial captain of the Beagle) and the theory of creationism, Wickham was ultimately intrigued by Darwin's idea of evolution. Towards the end of the voyage of the Beagle, Wickham began to accept the idea of evolution as true.
:If this is true, we need a reliable source to back this up. An anonymous editor cited a DVD series, but this isn't verifiable. Can someone confirm this? Brisvegas 12:45, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: From article
Talk:KJQY (San Diego)

message: "KJQY or K-Joy was an easy listening music radio station based in San Diego. The call letters first appeared on May 20, 1979 when the call letters of beautiful music station KOZN-FM 103.7 were changed. It stayed at 103.7 (now Sophie @ 103.7) until 1995. The station had evolved into an adult contemporary format by this time.
A couple of years later in 1997, KJQY moved to what is now KLQV 102.9, and in 1998, KJQY moved over to what is now Star 94.1 and stayed there until November 21, 2001, though by this time the format had become oldies. KJQY made a final move to 95.7, but it lasted for only six weeks until January 2, 2002, when the oldies station's call letters were changed to KOCL "Kool 95.7". In 2004 this station became country music US 95.7.
As of 2007, the KJQY call letters haven't been assigned to a radio station since 2002."
Huh? This is completly incorrect, so I am changing it. Essentially, San Diego had two different KJQYs at two differnt times. I know this information because, well, I actually worked for the second version!
Garyboroda (talk) 04:12, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracies regarding KJQY's history 
Talk:Shamlaji

message: Hello @Redtigerxyz, I saw you put a tag up on this page in 2021. I do want to ask what your reasons are for this suggestion before I offer my opinion Chilicave (talk) 04:53, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Chilicave, the Shamlaji temple is a notable WP:N temple and deserves its own separate article, while this article can focus on the place of Shamlaji as a town.--Redtigerxyz  Talk  06:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Redtigerxyz, I could not find any reliable sources about the Shamlaji temple outside of the one's mentioned in the article. When looking at WP:N,  I'm not sure we have enough sources to be able to split off this entire section into a new article, unless you are able to find some sources. Chilicave (talk) 03:50, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting the article
Talk:Vidyasagar Setu

message: and when commissioned on October 10, 1992, it became the longest span bridge of this type in the world.[6] At that time it was the first cable-stayed bridge in India, the largest in Asia and the third largest in the world
First sentence (referecned) say it was the longest span. Second sentence say it was the 3rd largest(different definition?). From List of largest cable-stayed bridges there appear to be two cable-stayed bridges that were open and had longer spans.
*Skarnsund Bridge in Norway 530m opened 1991.
*Ikuchi Bridge in Japan 490m opened 1991.
Note: Vidyasagar Setu isn't metioned on List of largest cable-stayed bridges and it should be. ShakyIsles (talk) 02:48, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: How is the Vidyasagar Setu the longest Cable Stayed Bridge in India? At 5km+, the Bandra Worli Sea Link is a longer cable stayed bridge. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 20:04, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: , cable-stayed portions of sea-link are 600 and 250 metres. ❯❯❯   S A H A 11:51, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for answering, albeit a little too late. :) --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:30, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , not much, just five years  ❯❯❯   S A H A 16:10, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longest
Talk:KKJZ

message: KKJZ is no longer located on the campus of CSULB. The station moved to Westwood in 2015. 2600:6C50:1A3F:950A:4D5F:E024:6845:8ABE (talk) 11:27, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated Information
Talk:Kallanai Dam

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
Admins, I would like to rename this article to Kallanai which is the original name of the dam. 'Grand Anicut' could be redirected to Kallanai. Currently, it's the other way around. Lotlil 05:55, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Britannica calls it the Grand Anicut. Even recognizing that "Kallanai" is an older title, isn't "Grand Anicut" the commonly accepted name in English? Dekimasuよ! 04:29, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for looking into my request. The "Grand Anicut" is the anglicised version of Kallanai. I ran a quick Google query and while Kallanai returns 2110 hits, "Grand Anicut" returns 870 hits. Lotlil 05:26, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: so?  Sarvagnya 06:21, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. --Stemonitis 10:37, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested Move 

message: Kallani DAM, also called as Grand Anaicut in English is belongs to Thanjavur District, state of tamilnadu. I had noticed in one of Tamilnadu Favourite film star(Rajinikanth) movie, called Lingaa.... he is saying that it is in thiruchirapalli district, suddenly i was shocked and googled it, even in wikipedia its mentioned as kallanai belongs to Trichy, But actual its under the district thanjavur,  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.153.101.27 (talk) 20:19, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  /* Corrections*/  

message: Femal 103.164.241.76 (talk) 13:02, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kallanai dam
Talk:Stanley Reservoir

message: Even with just a few lines, this article is incorrect.  It states that all of the displaced persons were relocated in Mettur.  However, Savariyarpalyam was rebuilt near the new Stanley Resevoir, with a fraction of its original inhabitants.  Many of the former residents of Savariyarpalyam were moved north of the Pallar River to the Martalli, which is now in Karnataka.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Martalli (talk) 01:36, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Savariyarpalyam?
Talk:KLAA (AM)

message: KCAA Web site is now empty.  Suggestion that most of the information about this format change belongs in the history section (if at all) - not in the introductory lead section. Wikipedia is not a newspaper with breaking minute-by-minute developments or an industry gossip bulletin board.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 06:57, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

message: No sources, program unlikely to meet N. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:31, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Females Uncut]] 
Talk:Hawa Mahal

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 07:07, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 

message: 7 2409:4050:2E32:6232:0:0:57CB:490E (talk) 05:20, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hawa Mahal 

message: Shall a topic of tourism be added? 45.64.224.86 (talk) 16:41, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shall a topic of tourism be added? 
Talk:KLAC

message: The following paragraph was removed from the article due to what I believe is POV. The paragraph is not sourced, and likely contains original research. Any thoughts, sources? 
===Reactions from San Diegans===
After the format move to 570, many who live in the San Diego area had complained that they were unable to get the station's new signal, fueling the complaint that AM 570 had "Los Angeles-ized", and no longer catered to San Diego's sports teams and listeners.
This also came to the attention of Premiere Radio Networks, Jim Rome's syndicator; XEPRS-AM, "the Mighty 1090," a rival radio station that broadcasts in San Diego and parts of Orange County and Los Angeles (and run by the Broadcast Company of the Americas, whose CEO John Lynch administered XTRA Sports Radio in San Diego from the mid 1980s to its merger with 1150 in 2002), picked up The Jim Rome Show in September 2005. 
As the radio flagship home of the Los Angeles Lakers, KLAC normally put much more emphasis and focus on the team, possibly very much to the chagrin of listeners who are not supporters of the Lakers. This was especially evident in the midday program The Loose Cannons, then headlined by Hartman, Jacobs and Laker radio broadcaster and former player Mychal Thompson.
--ḾỊḼʘɴίcả • Talk • I DX for fun! 01:19, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced POV paragraph. 

message: After the format move to 570, many who live in the San Diego area had complained that they were unable to get the station's new signal, fueling the complaint that AM 570 had "Los Angeles-ized", and no longer catered to San Diego's sports teams and listeners.
This also came to the attention of Premiere Radio Networks, Jim Rome's syndicator; XEPRS-AM, "the Mighty 1090," a rival radio station that broadcasts in San Diego and parts of Orange County and Los Angeles (and run by the Broadcast Company of the Americas, whose CEO John Lynch administered XTRA Sports Radio in San Diego from the mid 1980s to its merger with 1150 in 2002), picked up The Jim Rome Show in September 2005. 
As the radio flagship home of the Los Angeles Lakers, KLAC normally put much more emphasis and focus on the team, possibly very much to the chagrin of listeners who are not supporters of the Lakers. This was especially evident in the midday program The Loose Cannons, then headlined by Hartman, Jacobs and Laker radio broadcaster and former player Mychal Thompson.
--ḾỊḼʘɴίcả • Talk • I DX for fun! 01:19, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Reactions from San Diegans
Talk:M. A. Chidambaram Stadium

message: I remove the following unverified claim from the 'Facts and figures' section
:The Electronic Scoreboard at Chepauk was purchased second hand from the Melbourne Cricket Ground
If this is indeed a fact, please add it back with proper references ~ srini 15:36, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electronic scoreboard 

message: The end names are 'Anna Pavilion End' and 'Walajah Road End' aren't they ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.75.131.138 (talk) 02:56, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  End Names 

message: The capacity of MA Chidambaram Stadium was not clear for years 
Now CSK Ceo confirmed that it would be 40,000 
So I request to change the capacity to 40,000 49.205.85.3 (talk) 15:58, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capacity 

message: @Ragavcricket7 Where is it mentioned that KMK stand end is the new name, send a photo or attach a source please. The stand is new but the end is still Anna Pavilion. The players entering the stand in the back, the sign is still called Anna Pavilion Anirudhvee (talk) 01:54, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stand names
Talk:Arun Jaitley Cricket Stadium

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 04:00, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: We could really do with a photo of the stadium. Can someone upload one to Wikimedia Commons please? Axl ¤ [Talk] 10:11, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: In the history section, the history discussed is of the staristics, not of the ground. Could someone add the history of the ground please? —usernamekiran (talk) 00:56, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of the ground? 

message: Every ground should have an area/dimensions section so that readers/visitors/observers/thinkers can inherently develop the framework in their mind to visualize the area in terms of SI units like Hectare. —saunsh (talk) 03:18, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area/Dimensions of the ground? 

message: I see that this page was moved last year after a formal renaming by the owners. Was there ever any proof that the WP:COMMONNAME has changed as well as the official name? I also don't understand the statement that says "Interestingly the ground would retain the name of Feroz Shah Kotla Ground" What is the difference between the Stadium and the Ground?Spike 'em (talk) 15:36, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , it should be moved back to the Feroz Shah Kotla and the lede should have Feroz Shah Kotla Stadium (officially Arun Jaitley Satdium), as we do in all other articles. I thought it was done through a discussion, COMMONNAME did not change, will never be as no more matches will be played at Kotla anymore or there will be hardly any. Drat8sub (talk) 00:17, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move / common name? 
Talk:Sector 16 Stadium

message: Note:  Project Banner with Chandigarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chandigarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:04, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Chandigarh workgroup Addition
Talk:Purana Qila

message: I note that several different spellings are used for the 'Old Fort', as the article calls it - Purana Quila, Purana Qila, Purana Killa, and Purana Qi'lah. Would it not be more expedient to use one spelling, seeing as all these are pronounced the same anyway?
I can also see that a picture of the Sher Mandal is labeled as a tomb. Piouspiast 07:26, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slightly Confusing Names 

message: What's this concept about a "Hindu Hero" king? It has no links to anywhere. Nowhere in history have we read about Hemu being a Hindu hero! He was a warrior & a king. That's it! What is this right-wing attempt to corrupt information on Wikipedia.
I request all references to Hemu as a Hindu hero or as re-establishing a Hindu Kingdom be deleted from this section. No one refers to Chandragupta Maurya as a re-establisher from Greek to ancient Indian religion. No one refers to Ashoka as a Buddhist establishment. Please stop Hindutva in it's tracks now before they corrupt Wiki & history all over!!!
Aman Zaidi (talk) 12:41, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unverifiable 

message: The history section which has been removed might have to be re-added
Salilb (talk) 10:07, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 04:05, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: There seems to have been an attempt to insert historical assertions regarding Indraprastha and, more sinisterly, to suggest Humayun deliberately destroyed the city to build the Old Fort. Indraprastha can only be considered a mythological city and I am therefore editing these assertions to make them NPOV. 122.176.206.221 (talk) 15:29, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Indraprastha" 

message: The introduction talks of the fort itself being the oldest structure in Delhi. It also asserts that it was built by the 'Pandavas' before the 'Mahabharata War'. Pray, tell me when did the war happen? Who actually were the Pandavas? When did they live? 5000 years ago? Before the dawn of the Vedic Age? As said above, it is an attempt to saffronize history.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.216.172.133 (talk) 18:05, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baseless assertions
Talk:Karla Caves

message: I have found a painting in the great chitya hall of Karla Cave. It is on the top backside of the 10th piller of right side of entrance. To see that painting a person has to use a light of mobile phone . Place the lights focus on the top of piller which I had said earlier . Because painting is not in clear state . And it is in darkness. This is the painting which I am talking about.On 18th December 2021 I had captured this painting in my phone. Can I add this image.Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 17:59, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Painting of Karle Cave