Talk:Clan Grant

message: The origin of the name section really needs an overhaul. When I originally wrote the article for Clan Grant (back when it was under Grant) i had a complete history which explained various origin stories. The french one was present but more importantly was the Norse origin story. The French origin is HEAVILY disputed and should not be the single origin story in this article. Kilter 07:29, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of the name

message: We should remove the content listing uses of 'Grant', due to all of this information being presented on Grant. Someone looking for those links will not be coming through this article any longer after the afrementioned disambiguation page was setup, and thus it is now just clogging up the current article.
I'll remove this information, replacing it with a link to Grant in some manner, within a week if there are no objections.
Kilter 00:43, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grant Place/Person names 

message: In the 16thC section, it's surprising to see a reference to the 1591/2 murder of the "bonnie earl o' Murray" (at Donibristle). At least, it appears to refer to that event, and attributes responsibility, in some vague, way to Grants. I've read the contemporary notices that were published listing those "wanted" for the killing - Gordons of Huntly, their relatives and allies - and don't see a single Grant name mentioned. Nor have I ever seen any other mention of Grant involvement. (Weeyk (talk) 11:09, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Involvement in murder of the Earl of Moray 

message: An example of a DNA project gone wrong? Out of 192 kits tested, six are R1a. These six men are split into two groups - one group consisting of four men, the other consisting of two. The project admins start off admitting that they were aiming for a 'Viking y-DNA signature', and the group of two men fitted their needs because ". One of the men from this group (Kit # 21365) can only trace his ancestry back to southern England in the 17th century.
And there's this gem from the project's FAQ (boldface mine): ""
Two of 192 is only 0.010%! The amazing thing is that the ancestry of the singled out man only reaches back to England, and no earlier than the 17th century. Apparently DNA can "prove" that this man descends not only from the early 14th century chiefs of the clan, but also from Vikings, the mythical Æsir, and the Trojans who fled the Trojan War. It's amazing how in the right hands DNA can prove almost anything! I don't think the project website, all by itself, can be considered a reliable source for Wikipedia.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 06:41, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, all this does not surprise me. Very little can be learnt from DNA, the reason being that you need both the DNA of the ancestor as well as the descendant to prove a link. DNA does not survive long after death as it is not found in bones, nails or hair. Re the vikings: the tradition of burning the dead would not help matters, but some lucky finds of vikings have managed to give DNA from organic mater preserved in the teeth. In order to trace direct male viking ancestry, the candidates would need to be descended from one of the lucky finds. I think the companies marketing the DNA are taking liberties with peoples hopes and aspirations. What is more concrete, and turning out to also prove a point that has been raised by modern historians, is that DNA samples are noting that very few of the clansmen are actually related by male descendant within a clan, but rather form many small groups. This would seem to confirm that the clan is a territorial military grouping that shared resources and adopted common identifications (e.g. Name, mythology), rather than a family that has grown out of all proportions from one person. Many people mistakenly think that the mathematics of ancestry are one man has two sons, who in turn each have two sons, and these grandchildren each have two sons. Unfortunately it does not work like this, but rather follows the pattern of demography. e.g. the estimated population of Scotland in the Middle ages was about 500,000 to 1,000,000, now it is estimated to be just over 5,000,000, so there should be about 5 to 10 male descendants for every man born in about 1000. Naturally there is immigration both to and from Scotland to consider but this figure seems about right. Yours ever, Czar Brodie (talk) 10:07, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: One of those GRANTS in the FTDNA project, is said to be of the chief line. He has kit no 225600 Arthur Grant b 1683 Echt, Aberdeenshire. His DNA shows R1a North Western type, probably cluster II and L664+. There is another too, from the chief line testing North-Western R1a. I just wanted to tell that there are some people from the Trøndelag area (Trondheim) in Norway testing the same. Some of them papertrail their ancestry back to early 1600 - all the way in the Trøndelag area - where Haakon Ladejarl lived. The genetic distance between those from Trøndelag and this descendant of Arthur Grant, is around 1000-1200 years. Haakon Ladejarl had a lot of women. In the end, this was the cause of his death (read SNORRE). The Norman knight Maurice de PRENDERGAST's desendants have the same HG, so also a testing descendant of Rotrou Viscount de Chateaudun b.c. 1023 (FRANCE) and descendants of Sir Frances DRAKE http://www.familytreedna.com/public/R1a/default.aspx?vgroup=R1a&vgroup=R1a§ion=yresults  Eaglestein (talk) 21:45, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  DNA madness 

message: A cerain IP user keeps on removing sourced info without discussing it first. You must discuss before removing sourced info. If you want to say that the Grants may have come from Ireland then you must quote a reliable source to verify it. Otherwise, if it is unsourced that information can be removed as per the rules of Wikipedia. I may be forced to consult an admin if he/she keeps on breaking the rules.QuintusPetillius (talk) 10:23, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Clan Grant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150912011923/http://www.fionamsinclair.co.uk/genealogy/highlandclans/GrantG.htm to http://www.fionamsinclair.co.uk/genealogy/HighlandClans/GrantG.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130820104311/http://www.clangrantcanada.ca/ to http://www.clangrantcanada.ca/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:54, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified