lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Acraman impact structure

message: As per either a recent request at or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: image assists in lifting this article above stub  However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question. ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the "Requesting an assessment section", and someone will take a look at it.--VS talk 08:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: VS, I've looked at this article a few times and have been intending to upgrade it as I have lots of references to hand. I'll get on to it shortly and will let you know in case you want to do a second review. --Zamphuor 12:27, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment completed for [[{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]

message: Someone may want to apply crater template

--YakbutterT (talk) 23:24, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Crater Infobox?
Talk:Veevers crater

message: "The crater was discovered in July 1975[2] during a government geological survey and named in honor of Australian John James Veevers who had worked in the area in the late 1980s[3]"  
There is something wrong here. Reference [2], which was published in 1976 describes the crater as being Veevers Crater, yet reference [3] says that Veevers worked in the area in the late 1980s.  I wonder if this is a 'typo' and should really read the 1960s?
Greg Winterflood (talk) 08:39, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Resolved.  J.J. Veevers worked in the area in the late 1950's. (personal communication, 17 May 2011)
--Summerdrought (talk) 06:06, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

text: Done--Summerdrought (talk) 05:14, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Georgios Poulos

message: Article reassessed and graded as stub. --dashiellx (talk) 15:37, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Old Campus

message: This topic clearly does not deserve an article of its own, and it should be moved to the Yale article.
--Awning 15:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This topic is notable and the Yale article is too long already.  Staib 20:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to move 

message: Nobody says The Old Campus, it's just Old Campus  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.36.54.186 (talk) 00:51, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The" Old Campus?
Talk:Valerian (medication)

message: I couldn't find a definition of "comproved", used in Uses and Benefits paragraph 1:
"Because its largely comproved benefits..."
Idiomatically I think this should read "Because OF its largely ??? benefits..."
but I couldn't figure out what was intended by comproved - inferred? observed? suspected? anedotal?
Hope someone knows how to sort this out!
74.104.110.56 15:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All of the information on this page belongs in the Medical uses section of the article on the valerian plant. I suggest a merger. Fuzzform 20:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I propose that Valerian (medication) and Valerian (plant) be merged into a new page "Valerian".—Who123 18:32, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger
Talk:Rapoport-Bick (rabbinic dynasty)

message: I started this article by moving the section 'Rapoport / Bick Dynasty' from Medzhibozh (Hasidic dynasty). --Redaktor 15:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start of article

message: A long-simmering editorial dispute between  and  over how to deal with information about certain Hasidic topics has reached the Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal. Please see and provide any helpful input at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-04-29 Mezhbizh (Hasidic dynasty). Thank you, IZAK 15:59, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mezhbizh (Hasidic dynasty) at Mediation Cabal
Talk:Viaticum

message: This article deserves to be developed, but somebody's adding info that is poorly sourced and not very well explained. Also, my sources (I provided the long note on Charon's obol as pre-Christian viaticum) say that the Church condemned the practice of placing the wafer in the mouth of those already dead; the viaticum was only supposed to be administered to those still living. It nourishes the soul for the journey. Cynwolfe (talk) 22:11, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Messy edits

message: How is "viaticum" a haplology for via tecum?  Same number of syllables.  Some other figure of speech, perhaps, but not haplology. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 21:07, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  haplology?
Talk:Milton (horse)

message: Anybody got a good photo of him? -   Culnacréann  19:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't think of any in the PD off the top of my head, but I'll have a look when I get chance. There has to be at least one somewhere, given how well known he was. Faerie Queene (talk) 02:48, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo of Milton
Talk:Harry Blackstone Sr.

message: The text includes the following: "When the magician suddenly pushed the perforated front of the cabinet backward, she seemed to be pierced appeared through the holes in the font of the box (to the accompaniment of her blood-curdling scream)."  The phrases from 'pieced' backward, and from 'appeared' forward don't seem to go together well.  As I do not remember the illusion (it's been way too long), I don't know what you are trying to describe.  In short, the sentence needs work.  7&6=thirteen (talk) 10:50, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This sentence doesn't make sense
Category talk:Computer hacking

message: I removed Category:Hacking as a subcategory of :Category:Computer crimes because only a handful of the articles actually talk about crimes or convicted criminals.  Most of them are either about legitimate hackers (ie security experts), or hacking tools (which aren't necessarilly illegal), or ethically questionable but not necessarilly illegal computer activities (eg cheating in computer games).  Therefore this category isn't a good subcategory of "crimes" or "computer crimes". Dugwiki 15:46, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed from parent category [[:Category:Computer crimes]]
Talk:Pig Island (novel)

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  12:28, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:S (programming language)

message: How does this language compare to APL and/or LISP?
:Read the paper from Becker (in PostScript format), as he discusses both these languages, and how they influenced the development of S. Probably the best way to compare the languages is to experience it first-hand. If you don't have access to S-PLUS, then get R, which is a GNU dialect of S. There are many many examples on the web showcasing R examples.+mwtoews 20:46, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you mean this one, then there is no relation. +mt 12:33, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

message: The link for "A Brief History of S" does not work as of today
orzel -- 2009-05-17  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.225.154.2 (talk) 01:18, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Works for me. Do you have a PostScript reader/converter? +mt 16:24, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: This 
"The R implementation, part of the GNU free software project, is the top statistical language in the TIOBE index (position 18 in September 2013), three spots above the commercial software SAS."
is not true anymore.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.228.187.106 (talk) 21:27, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obsolete reference 

message: In the release notes of R 4.4.0 it is said "is.R() is deprecated as no other S dialect is known to be in use." 
193.166.223.5 (talk) 09:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the original S "dead"?
Wikipedia talk:Association of Members' Advocates/Requests/March 2007/tuben

message: This is a frivolous case created by an editor with an admitted conflict of interest, who seemingly will only be happy if the article named Robert Coulter is the one about his non-notable employer, and any other Robert Coulters are at a different location. Rather than create an article at say Robert Coulter (organ maker), User:Tuben has repeatedly moved and disrupted the existing article as much as possible, as there are two Robert Coulters one of which is his boss which he states here.
The original Robert Coulter article was created on 24 January, as I have had the deleted page temporarily restored here.  User:Tuben edited the existing article on 7 February and changed it from an article about the politician to an article about his employer, then performed a copy and paste move to Rev Dr Robert Coulter as can be seen by this diff. This clearly should not have happened as it's against the manual of style on naming conventions, and also causes GDFL problems. It should also be noted that he didn't even add an  link or anything from his Robert Coulter to the politician's article.
His Robert Coulter was speedy deleted  as NN on 11 February, after being moved from Robert Coulter to Robert I. Coulter.
Since then he's blanked the page of the other Robert Coulter, and on two occasions changed the article to his Robert Coulter.
He's then decided that his Robert Coulter should be at Robert Coulter and moved the other article accordingly, but hasn't created an article for his Robert Coulter yet. 
I brought this up at ANI and the politican Robert Coulter was rightfully moved back to the correct place and the redirects created during all the moves deleted, and an endorsement was made regarding the non-notability of the organ maker. I didn't even move the page back, it was moved by administrator JzG.
User:Tuben is welcome to create an article at say Robert Coulter (organ maker) but has repeatedly chosen not to do so, repeatedly moving the existing article to a variety of different names so that his article can be placed at Robert Coulter. I suppose we should be thankful that his boss isn't called Elvis Presley, as no doubt the existing article would have been moved to Elvis Presley (singer) or something similar to make room for his boss.
His claim that he created the page about his boss and it was then edited to be about a politician is clearly false as can be seen by the history of the deleted page here, the article about the politician was there first.  He left a message on my talk page stating he would continue to disrupt the article, I took that to mean in terms of either moving or editing the existing article, so I left a polite message on his talk page.
It should also be noted that various versions of his Robert Coulter article are nothing more than a copy and paste of Coulter's biog from his own site.One Night In Hackney303 15:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Frivolous
Talk:Kate Seelye

message: The last section, "As a paid up member of the Hillary for President campaign...", etc., is surely about Katherine Q. Seelye of the NY Times, not about Kate Seelye.  It should be removed. Johnabdl 21:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aren't the last two paragraphs about the NY Times Seelye, not this one? 
Talk:Llapingacho

message: Deleted entire page, as it was the text of a non-existent and non-related article on Tiko Tiko the clown.  If the text is needed, see history.
You realize that the list of restaurants is just a filler to make the article look longer. Besides, as you said, llapingachos are typical from the highlands and the restaurants of the list are mostly from Guayaquil. This is very contradicting. You should write down some restaurants that are from the highlands, because the best llapingachos are made up there. No one who eats llapingachos in the highlands would ever eat them in the guayaquil. And saying that guayaquil is the main city of Ecuador is very biased and it is your personal opinion. If guayaquil was the main city, it would be the capital.--141.30.219.173 (talk) 09:21, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:GoMusicNow

message: I'm pretty sure that you cant download songs more than twice.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.110.194.11 (talk) 20:31, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unlimited Downloads

message: This is not true (now anyway, since I just bought September by Earth, Wind and Fire and downloaded it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.216.15.197 (talk) 08:59, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Site non-functional
Talk:Francesco Canova da Milano

message: I am fairly new to doing any talking/editing with Wikipedia.  However, having consulted Wikipedia pages many times, I am somewhat familiar with your editing standards.  For example, in your Mozart article, he's referred to as "Mozart" after the first reference.  Same with any number of others.  However, Francesco Canova da Milano is referred to as "Francesco."  If this is because "da Milano" simply means "from Milan," then it should be explained.  However, place names seem to be commonly used as last names in the case of U.S. Italians and we don't refer to them by their first names only.  Thus, it would seem appropriate that since "da Milano" is used as a last name here, then he should be referred to as "da Milano" or "Milano."  You do have him filed under "Milano" in your alphabetic listing of Talk pages.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueIris2 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Fort Apocalypse

message: In the lower caverns ("crystal caverns" with the light blue walls) there are the words "PLEXAR WAS HERE" written inside the wall. This can be seen in this C64 longplay video. According to some forum discussions in the web Plexar was the nickname of a hacker (see this German forum talk) or programmer (another chat, also in German, sorry). On the other hand, I remember vaguely the story, that Plexar might have been the name of a monster (some kind of alien spider) in a preceding game from either Synapse or one of the programmers, and the graffito was just a reference to that game. However, I haven't been able to find out which game this could have been, nor any other web search result in this direction.
Maybe someone remembers an arcade game with a monster with this name, or whoever or whatever Plexar might have been (I cannot really believe the hacker story since it might. Since the graffito is part of most forum talks about Fort Apocalypse (but yet not fully answered), this information would fit well to the article.--SiriusB (talk) 13:56, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Plexar was here"
Talk:Anita Bose Pfaff

message: This page was redirected to Anita Bose-Pfaff, with the surname hyphenated. I have reverted it back to this page, based on a Google search revealing that press sources do not hyphenate Frau Pfaff's surnames, and nor does she. Please don't change the title of this page without raising it for discussion first. Many thanks. -- TinaSparkle 16:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I'm happy with that - thank you. I think it's generally better to use the name that the person herself uses, especially seeing as this is the English-language Wikipedia, but I do see what you mean about the German rules. -- TinaSparkle 10:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title of page

message: "Anita was never given her father's last name and grew up as Anita Schenkl."
So then why is the page address and main title 'Anita Bose Pfaff' and not 'Anita Schenkl Pfaff' like the first words on the page actually call her? And throughout the rest of the article she's referred to by many names; Pfaff, Anita, Anita Bose, Anita Pfaff etc. I thought the idea was that a person would be referred to by their last name. Example from hitting the Random Article button until I got a decent one, Steven Blum is referred to as 'Blum' throughout his page, not 'Steven' or 'Steve' or whatever. So, what does she actually use as a last name? Just Pfaff? Bose Pfaff? Schenkl Pfaff? What?
Probably not 'What' actually, that wouldn't make much sense. 86.29.7.17 (talk) 02:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried to fix some of your objections, all very valid.  I'm not sure whether she has actually changed her name to Anita Bose Pfaff, or the Indian media has unilaterally changed it.  Will look into this.  Fowler&fowler«Talk» 15:24, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: She does (herself) use the name Anita Bose Pfaff or Anita B. Pfaff, or Anita Pfaff in her academic publications.  See here.  Fowler&fowler«Talk» 15:34, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Name 

message: What is a trunk office?  I couldn't find a definition using Google search.  Terms not commonly known and also not easily found in a dictionary, encyclopedia or with a normal Internet search engine should either not be used or be explained.  The purpose of Wikipedia is to supply information.  Using terms or grammar that are not readily understandable does not further this purpose. 37.99.32.90 (talk) 02:08, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:   trunk office
Talk:Twilight Syndrome

message: Going off of my understanding of the Twilight Syndrome franchise, the way this page talks about Moonlight Syndrome is rather inaccurate. Although it calls it a "non-canon side-story", it follows straight on from the previous games in the series as a sequel. It is only later games that ignored it, like a retcon; calling it a "non-canon side-story" seems to be more like (inaccurate) fan-speak than actually presenting the history of the series. The thing is that this series is so obscure, especially in English, that I don't have any good sources to back this up. Furthermore, the conception of Suda's games being a "trilogy" is also something invented by fans; the interview cited has the interviewer bring this up, but not Suda himself, so I'm not sure if that can be considered as a source to be saying what this article says it's saying. These are just some thoughts that better editors than me should use, I'll only be changing things that are just not said anywhere in the sources. 67.168.184.59 (talk) 22:08, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding Moonlight's place in the series, I think calling it a gaiden is more accurate. In this interview, Suda says: だから『ムーンライト』は『トワイライト』をベースにしつつも、自由にやろうと思ったんですよね。This translates to roughly: "Even though Moonlight was based on Twilight, we thought to create it with a degree of freedom." The remarkably different tone in the game, the change in title, and the release of Twilight games after Moonlight is also testament to Moonlight being a side story. Regarding Moonlight's place in a trilogy, I agree. Kill Screen cites Silver Case, Flower, Sun, and Rain, and Killer7 as the "Kill the Past" trilogy HERE. The source that refers to Moonlight being in the trilogy seems less reliable to me. And honestly, the notion of any of these games being in a trilogy is so rarely referred to, that it doesn't make sense to include. I think we can definitely say there are relations between the games, but calling it a trilogy is a tad too far. TarkusABtalk 02:07, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Moonlight's place in series
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Acalamari

message: Acalamari's edit stats using "wannabe Kate" tool as of 16:25, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I like the long, civil and honest arguments in the oppose section, and their counterpoints; this is the way RfA should be. I wish more people offered reasoned explanations behind their opinions and were allowed to challenge other peoples' opinions constructively without being censored for it. Grandmasterka 23:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, every oppose has been very sincere and offered the candidate ways they can improve, Kudos to all involved Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 23:27, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sweet, sweet discussion
Talk:.ch

message: "Family names in many Slavic languages ends with ch (i.e. -ich, -vich, -vych, -ovich), so .ch is very interesting to them."
Huh? 165.155.110.11 (talk) 19:21, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obscure comment 

message: I know where it comes from.
Read this line again:
"The ".ch" domain does not come from the name for Switzerland in any of its national languages; "die Schweiz", "Suisse", "Svizzera" or "Svizra"."
It DOES!
German: sCHweiz!
82.12.1.173 (talk) 15:39, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe no one noticed, or maybe they thought you were not serious. Are you serious? If so, can you point to any other sources (book, newspaper, website) that would support your suggestion?  At the moment many editors might guess you created that idea in your mind alone. —fudoreaper (talk) 23:18, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where .ch really comes from 

message: What is ISO 3166-3 ?    ----MountVic127 (talk) 19:28, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume you meant to refer to ISO 3166-1 alpha-3. If that's the case, then Switzerland's code there is CHE. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 19:43, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is Three Letter Code for .ch
Talk:Zionist Organization of America

message: I have removed the following two sentences from the article:
:"The Zionist Organization of America was instrumental in mobilizing the support of the U.S. government, Congress, and the American public for the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948.[citation needed] Former ZOA presidents during the period included Brandeis, Louis Lipsky, Daniel Frisch, Stephen Samuel Wise, and Abba Hillel Silver.[citation needed]"
because they have both been unsourced since February 2017.  Either or both sentences may be accurate, but if anyone wishes to return them to the article, they must be supported by citations from a WP:RS. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:58, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of unsourced sentences
Talk:History of rail transport in China

message: Please don't nominate incomplete articles and stubs to DYK. This article doesn't even have a lead! We are rewarding incomplete work...
:In other ways, however, it's more completely than many other DYK's. Xiner (talk, email) 03:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Critique

message: This is odd: numerous Chinese sources including the Chinese Wikipedia claim there was a ½-km exhibition line (the 德小铁路) constructed in Beijing in 1865 by a "British capitalist" named "Durand" (杜兰德) before being dismantled by the emperor.
It seems plausible, but a few fishy aspects: the only prominent Durands at the time were in the British India service or inventing canned goods, the guy's first name is never mentioned, the "sources" in the articles above are all non-scholarly, and of 6000 Google hits for this thing all but 2 are exact copy/pastes of the exact same material. Was this just invented by the Beijing Railway Dep't to knock some of the steam out of the Shanghainese?
English-language sources (who would tend to notice things like failed exhibition railways in the Forbidden City) don't include even so much as a debunking of this thing. — LlywelynII 23:02, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: First railroad

message: Do you know anything about "Pioneer"? --NearEMPTiness (talk) 08:35, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Pioneer"