Talk:Erich Wolfgang Korngold

message: I'm not sure what this is trying to say:
*Korngold for years attracted almost no critical attention, and considerable critical disdain.
It seems to me that "considerable critical disdain" means that the attention he got was far from "almost none".  It might have been negative attention, but it was attention nevertheless.  JackofOz 11:39, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe it should be something like "For many years Korngold attracted little positive critical attention."  I know that for a long time he was derided as a "movie-music" composer and it is only in the last couple decades that people have begun to discover the astonishing music he wrote in his youngest years (I'll never forget my own initial encounter with Die tote Stadt -- when previously I mainly knew him as the composer of the music that accompanied Errol Flynn dancing around a sound-stage).  Antandrus  (talk) 15:14, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I like that suggestion.  I only know the couple of well-known arias from Die tote Stadt, but my favourite of his lesser-known works is the Sinfonietta, Op.5.  Astoundingly assured writing for any age, let alone a teenager.  But I still admire his stirring film music as well.  Film music in general really has been given an undeservedly bad rap.  JackofOz 04:06, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I guess this is just commenting on the conversation here and not the article, but have you (by "you," I mean Antandrus) ever listened to Korngold's film music a little more closely than by just cursorily analyzing it as it passed between your ears as you watched those old Errol Flynn swashbucklers?  Have you ever noticed that when you listen to a cue of his divorced from the screen, its form and melodic continuity sound as if they were conceived of for there own sake, but when you listen to that same cue with the scene for which it was written, you suddenly realize that every single point of even the most minor significance in the cue precisely matches up with something of equal significance on the screen?  I don't know about you, but I don't know of any other composer who has written for film that could write mickey-mousing music like that that could, at the same time, have such firm integrity on its own.  In fact, there is such a dearth of composers who can write convincing mickey-mousing music that the notion of "mickey mousing" has come to be known as something almost inherently derisive to anyone who employs the technique.  Batman Jr. 06:10, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Might I suggest Korngold for years after his death attracted almost no critical praise, but considerable critical disdain. This would accord with the postmodern trend to re-evaluate the work of long-deprecated creative artists. Consider the art of Norman Rockwell, pictorial works once thought sentimental bordering on schlock, now celebrated. And we might add a whole raft of women composers whose music was of its time but fell out of fashion, now championed as 'suppressed'.60.241.173.20 (talk) 20:29, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Critical attention

message: Comment made to person removing the box:
I am aware of the heated discussion about inforboxes for composers and that many have voiced against, not sure that being a concensus though. Personally I believe that they are very helpful in particular for less known composers as the box may contain all that people may wish to know.
I am not sure whether it is all right to go and remove a box from an article which you have not otherwise contributed to - perhaps you should have raised the question on that article's discussion page.
In any event, as the box contained information not available in the tag line I suggest, politely, at least you go back and ensure that the deleted information be added to the tag line.Classickol 16:57, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean the information surrounding his death? I'm sorry I missed that in the first place. Thanks for pointing this out to me. I've added it back in. By the way, perhaps the article should say where, exactly, he died in the USA? Cheers, Moreschi  Talk 17:18, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Korngold is a significant composer and it would be disappointing if people just read the box instead of the article. "Genre: Classical (romantic style)" hardly explains what Korngold was about. It's good that the box has gone. -Kleinzach 17:34, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Left the field for "needs infobox" for the overall Biography project blank. Not my fight. :) - Yamara 23:10, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 23:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: :Image:Korngold.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
(Karpaten1 (talk) 01:42, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Korngold.jpg

message: I read here that 'Among other things, [the 'Robin Hood' score] features some quotation of the third movement theme in Beethoven's Fifth Symphony'. I believe this claim to be completely false; however, can anyone point out to me what the original writer was referring to...? Pfistermeister (talk) 21:42, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Robin Hood' and *Beethoven 5*...?? 

message: I think this template should be removed. Anyone agree? Francesco Malipiero (talk) 19:11, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: No footnotes template

message: I believe the picture is unnecessary and confusing. It can be reached with a click of the hyperlink, and bares no direct relation to Korngold. --86.183.225.202 (talk) 11:49, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reinhardt Picture 

message: ===== American, Czech, or Austro-Hungarian? =====
The text classifies Korngold as an American composer "of Austro-Hungarian birth", but is this really correct? Korngold only moved permanently to the United States at over 40 years of age and was a naturalized citizen for just the last quarter (14 years) of his life; similarly only the last quarter of his oeuvre was composed while he was a US citizen. That he died a naturalized citizen isn't an argument; the same would apply to Béla Bartók and Sergei Rachmaninoff, who nevertheless are classified even in Wikipedia as Hungarian and Russian composers, respectively. That he was born in Brno doesn't make him a Czech, either, since the Czech Republic (or it's predecessor Czechoslovakia) didn't yet exist; at the time of Korngold's birth, Brno (or Brünn) was capitol of the Margraviate of Moravia, one of the lands constituting the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and it's populace (Jews included) were largely German-speakers. Korngold characterized himself as Viennese, having moved to that city at the age of four and having lived there for most (37 years) of his life. Considering that Korngold was already an eminent composer when he left Europe for good, it might be better to call him an Austro-Hungarian-American, Austrian-American, or (if you must) Moravian-American. "American composer of Austro-Hungarian birth" suggests that he was only born in Austria-Hungary but did all of his composing in America, while he actually composed most of his oeuvre in Austria-Hungary and post-WW1 Austria.--Death Bredon (talk) 15:05, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The New Grove has "Austrian composer."  I wouldn't mind doing it that way, and citing them.  (He's no more "American" than Stravinsky or Schoenberg, for that matter.) Antandrus  (talk) 15:17, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

text: I would suggest that Erich Korngold clearly chose to become an American citizen and was naturalized. He was an American when he died and is interred in America. Clearly, it is an insult to the great composer and his descendants to suggest that he is not an American! The Wikipedia article is correct as written "an American composer of Austro-Hungarian birth". The same is true of Rachmaninoff, who became an American Citizen the year before Korngold. Jay Gregg (talk) 19:46, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "American composer"? 

message: The text classifies Korngold as an American composer "of Austro-Hungarian birth", but is this really correct? Korngold only moved permanently to the United States at over 40 years of age and was a naturalized citizen for just the last quarter (14 years) of his life; similarly only the last quarter of his oeuvre was composed while he was a US citizen. That he died a naturalized citizen isn't an argument; the same would apply to Béla Bartók and Sergei Rachmaninoff, who nevertheless are classified even in Wikipedia as Hungarian and Russian composers, respectively. That he was born in Brno doesn't make him a Czech, either, since the Czech Republic (or it's predecessor Czechoslovakia) didn't yet exist; at the time of Korngold's birth, Brno (or Brünn) was capitol of the Margraviate of Moravia, one of the lands constituting the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and it's populace (Jews included) were largely German-speakers. Korngold characterized himself as Viennese, having moved to that city at the age of four and having lived there for most (37 years) of his life. Considering that Korngold was already an eminent composer when he left Europe for good, it might be better to call him an Austro-Hungarian-American, Austrian-American, or (if you must) Moravian-American. "American composer of Austro-Hungarian birth" suggests that he was only born in Austria-Hungary but did all of his composing in America, while he actually composed most of his oeuvre in Austria-Hungary and post-WW1 Austria.--Death Bredon (talk) 15:05, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The New Grove has "Austrian composer."  I wouldn't mind doing it that way, and citing them.  (He's no more "American" than Stravinsky or Schoenberg, for that matter.) Antandrus  (talk) 15:17, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

text: I would suggest that Erich Korngold clearly chose to become an American citizen and was naturalized. He was an American when he died and is interred in America. Clearly, it is an insult to the great composer and his descendants to suggest that he is not an American! The Wikipedia article is correct as written "an American composer of Austro-Hungarian birth". The same is true of Rachmaninoff, who became an American Citizen the year before Korngold. Jay Gregg (talk) 19:46, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  American, Czech, or Austro-Hungarian? 

message: About the sourcing so far, RMS, the refimprove tag at the top of the page isn't too useful. The article is fairly brief for a biography, yet includes 28 good sources evenly added throughout. It should first have some inline cn tags where necessary so someone can fix whatever details need sourcing. --Light show (talk) 21:57, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page tag 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Erich Wolfgang Korngold. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141019190330/http://www.korngold.jp/index-e.html to http://www.korngold.jp/index-e.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:58, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article would be improved by classifying Korngold's style, stating it up front, and expanding on it in the section on Composing Techniques & Style.  For example, if he were Tchaikovsky or Rachmaninoff, he would be classified as classical romantic school.  If he were Mozart, he would be classified as strict classical.  Debussy or Ravel would be impressionist.  Michael Nyman and John Adams would be minimalist.  So how do you classify Korngold?  Is there any better or more thorough classification than "late romantic"? From what little I have heard of Korngold he has a disoriented modernistic sound to which IMHO "romantic" should not be used since it is too far removed from Tchaikovsky and company.  Also, whatever other composers belong to his school should be mentioned as such, like Mozart and Haydn go together. I think he might be (also) classified as a composer of background music; music by the vast majority of people, not enjoyed as orchestral performance, though unconsciously enjoyed as background to a movie.  (PeacePeace (talk) 17:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Style? What School? "Composing Techniques & Style" Section 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
* 
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:37, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion 

message: In this article, there are two viewpoints from critical sources about Korngold's proficiency in incorporating counterpoint into his music, and they generally conflict, right in the same section (in Composing techniques and style). The first mention is in the yellow floating box quote from The New Grove Dictionary of Opera: "..., but is deficient in contrapuntal vitality.". The second mention is in the last paragraph: "...[Korngold] created intensely romantic, richly melodic and contrapuntally intricate scores,..."  
Do we think it is worth resolving, or at least "pointing" out (see what I did there), that it's a matter of debate? When I first read this whole article, I was rubbing my eyes wondering if I just read one of these wrong. Both sources seem to have generalized about all of Korngold's output, not just film scores vs. operas/classical works.  Culveyhouse (talk) 08:46, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clear up Korngold's strength or deficiency of counterpoint in his music? 

message: it's yet another Errol Flynn movie, and is one of the scores he repurposes in his Violin Concerto. Deliusfan (talk) 02:06, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Prince and the Pauper should be added in the significant film list