lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1980 in British music

message: The chart of best selling singles in the UK for 1980 on this page appears to be the same chart counted down by Tony Blackburn on Radio 1 at the time, which include sales data until the end of November/beginning of December (a point he made on the programme himself).  
However, I have found evidence of lists of the 100 best selling singles in the UK for each year in the 1980s which takes into account sales for the period not included in the lists which have been added to Wikipedia i.e. the sales for most of December.
For your reference, the webpage is here.  The parent site (index) also includes further information on best selling lists in the UK for the 1970s to 2002.
I think this situation applies to the sister articles for the early 1980s in British music.  Most of the time, the changes when comparing the charts are minor, but it does mean songs that peaked in later November/December are rated in higher positions.  For example, the chart that counted sales for the calendar year 1980 placed Abba's "Super Trouper" at 4, Blondie's "The Tide Is High" at 6 and John Lennon's "(Just Like) Starting Over" at 10.
Which of the charts do you think should be featured on this page? Col2006ie 23:41, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top 40 of 1980
Talk:Wazap!

message: - This article has been written and submitted by an employee of Wazap, however, to maintain Wikipedia's neutrality and to not use Wikipedia for any marketing purposes, all attempts to maintain factual, qualitative aspects of Wazap have been made.  
- If other Wikipedia users can demonstrate that aspects of the Wazap entry are misleading, non-factual or too "markety", that would be a good discussion to have.  Community input will strengthen the overall entry.  
- There have been no attempts to deceive, modify, cloak or hide the fact that this  has been submitted by a Wazap employee.  While this is not strictly forbidden by Wikipedia, it absolutely warrants peer-review to maintain neutrality.
JP Sherman 23:44, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of Interest

message: This article only has 1 small mention of any notability, a single award. No secondary sources, speedy deletion may be more appropriate.Wolvereness 21:03, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Deletion 

message: Ability to measure notability is subjective in this case. Secondary sources and citations will be added in response to the deletion to further ensure both relevance and notability.
lrprice 17:59, 12 November 2007
With secondary sources and citations, this article will be fine. Without such within a few days, it goes up for WP:AFD. -- Signed by Wolverenesst c 05:34, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objection to Deletion 

message: Wazap has discontinued operation in the English language and now serves only the Japanese market. How should this change in business be reflected in the article? Tgcondor (talk) 19:36, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of Business 

message: Upon further research, the Japanese operation of Wazap was actually founded before any of the other operations (Dec 2003); the date given refers to the debut of the service in Germany. As a matter of fact, the service is still operating in Japan.
I believe that an extensive rewrite is needed to address this bias. I'll edit the article with this in mind. Mannyneps (talk) 09:14, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Extensive Rewrite Needed
Talk:2RN (RTÉ Networks)

message: According to RTE, the name may have been inspired by the last three syllables of the song title Come Back To Erin.   
Is this sufficient to address the dubious annotation in the article?  It'd be helpful to locate the naming convention used by other early broadcasters at that time.  jxm (talk) 04:53, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of 2RN
Talk:South African Gentile National Socialist Movement

message: How were the Greyshirts different from groups like, the Ossewabrandwag? ----DanTD 23:47, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Christoph Marx ('The Ossewabrandwag As a Mass Movement, 1939-1941', Journal of Southern African Studies, Vol. 20, No. 2 (Jun. 1994), p. 208) the Greyshirts differed from the OB in that they were less about Afrikaans identity and more about co-opting the Aryan notions of Hitler and applying them to South Africa. As such they were active amongst the various white communities of the country rather than concentrating on the Afrikaans like the OB. That being said, he also states that a number of Greyshirt leaders later ended up in the OB where they brought in a stronger emphasis on anti-Semitism. Keresaspa (talk) 14:42, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greyshirts vs. Other South African Nazis 

message: Talk:Greyshirt#Requested_move_20_July_2015 In ictu oculi (talk) 01:23, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Greyshirt
Talk:Aarón Sánchez (chef)

message: Place of birth has conflicting information.  Quick facts say Chihuahua, Mexico while the biography section leads off with El Paso, TX. Vktnt (talk) 04:04, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of birth 
Talk:RTÉ.ie

message: This looks like an AfD? (Sarah777 23:45, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While I agree that the website is typed www.rte.ie, i disagree that the article should be called Rte.ie, especially considering that from the Logo, it is branded RTÉ.ie howth575 (talk) 21:56, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Jill Davie

message: The Career section in this article is virtually identical to a section of Jill Davie's bio on the Food Network web site. As such, I am removing the offending section per Wikipedia's policy on copyright violations. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 04:13, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 
Talk:Charlotte "Chuck" Charles

message: These redirects are a particularly nefarious form of "deletionism" because the content becomes tough to track down.  There is no consistency in the redirect of this article, as Olive Snook and Emerson Cod have articles.  These are secondary characters, and their articles exist, while the articles for the leads were redirected.  The recent mass deletions and redirects of articles on television characters and episodes has greatly diminished the quality of wikipedia and removed one of its best attractions for television researchers and watchers.  The rationale for this redirect makes little sense with the continued existence of the Emerson Cod and Olive Snook articles.
128.138.42.218 23:54, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Earp family

message: I removed mention of Martha's alleged son, the original entry of which was:
:*Martha Elizabeth Earp (September 25, 1845, in Kentucky - May 26, 1856, in Monmouth, Illinois)
:**Wyatt Berry Stapp Earp (March 19, 1848, in Monmouth, Illinois - January 13, 1929, in Los Angeles, California)
Since Martha would have only been 2½ yrs old when this person was born, I find the information dubious. And the link just goes to Wyatt's main page. --Evb-wiki (talk) 17:39, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Martha's offspring 

message: It's a well-known piece of mystery amongst Earp historians and genealogists alike that Virgil married a French girl 10 years his junior in 1870 and three years later no longer considered her his wife as he had taken up with Allie (his third wife) in 1874 (no official record of their marriage has ever been found).  For this reason, I have reverted the ommission of the information on Rosella Dragoo.  If anyone has any compelling reason why this is not interesting nor pertinent information to the "extended family" section of this article, post it. SkagitRiverQueen (talk) 15:52, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide a source for this "well-known piece of mystery". Per policy that is a good enough reason to remove anything. --Evb-wiki (talk) 15:56, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. SkagitRiverQueen (talk) 16:16, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rosella Dragoo 

message: Is anyone going to tackle the allegations, and fairly common ones, that all of the Earp wives were at one time or another prostituted by their husbands? 65.79.173.135 (talk) 17:55, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's been established that one or more of the Earp brothers' wives were "solied doves" before, after, and during their marriages (well...common-law marriages, at least).  However - I'm fairly certain from everything I've ever read about the Earps that the pimping allegation was nothing more than an unfounded rumor, spread by their opponents and enemies.  Of course, if anyone can come up with a reliable reference to back up the claim...the information should probably be then added. SkagitRiverQueen (talk) 22:04, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earps as Pimps 

message: Josiah, the son, is born before Walter, the father.  Clearly impossible.  I don't know the correct information, but this isn't it.
96.46.20.164 (talk) 06:21, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  impossible birth dates
Talk:Rowington

message: Seeing that Catherine Parr owned the manor it would seem odd that she didn't ever live there. So I am reverting edits to include that fact. Cls14 00:31, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also Blythe is Lord of the manor as he is mentioned in the House of Lords link. Unless being in the House of Lords and being in charge of the manor doesn't make you Lord of The Manor? Cls14 00:33, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Jenny Talia

message: I am in contact with Jenny Talia, getting the required information to prove notability.
The page should be fleshed out a bit more fairly soon.
(Although, having said that, being the daughter of KBW should be notability in and of itself.)
--Flapjackboy 01:01, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability issue
Talk:Oral microbiology

message: I should explain why I tagged this article. 90% of the article was written by a single user who has ties to Caister Academic Press.  This user has been spamming wikipedia articles with citations to Caister material.  Note that all references in this article, except for one (entered by a different user), are books from this one publisher.  The article gives undue weight to obscure topics in oral microbiology such as "Veillonella," which does not deserve an entire subsection.  The appearance is that this subsection was created so that books from Caister could be cited.  CatPath (talk) 16:23, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I think just a general section for bacteria, fungi, virus would suffice. Might have a go at this article at some point. Matthew Ferguson (talk) 18:11, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the explanation. I still think that  conveys your concerns more than , unless it were tagging a particular section. I'm a little confused as to why the information is being retained in the article if it isn't important to the topic. There's no reason why sections need to remain just because one editor made them. If the information is relevant and could be summarized, that should be done. Otherwise, I would think that it should just be removed. The real issue seems to be with a user or publisher. If they are a problem across articles, it should probably be addressed in a central location. I can't recall ever seeing a publisher singled out like this, so I'm not sure if there is precedent. —Ost (talk) 19:24, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I agree with your argument.  I put the  tag back.  I raised the problem with the user here a year ago, and others raised the issue at ANI back in 2008.  There may have been other discussions that I'm not aware of.  Most of the problematic articles have been rewritten or removed, although I still run across sections or even entire articles that the user copy-pasted from the publisher's books. I removed the copy-pasted sections from this article a while ago.  The other issues with the article will go away with the merger with Oral ecology.  Needless to say, I'm in favor of the merger.  CatPath (talk) 03:20, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest, books from a single publisher being promoted 

message: — Assignment last updated by AOXQueen (talk) 13:45, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Science Communication

message: — Assignment last updated by Kmaez (talk) 22:02, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Microbial Symbiosis and Microbiomes
Talk:East Lynne Theater Company

message: Please consider the entry about East Lynne Theater Company a valid one.  Other theaters are listed in Wikipedia.  Thank you.  Should you see any necessary changes that should be made, please let me know.
:Just because one theatre is listed on wikipedia doesn't give the automatic right for every theatre to be listed on the same grounds. Some theatres are more notable than others for a variety of reasons. If you want your article kept you'll have to write it in a good format in line with other articles. You will also have to justify its notability. --Marc Talk 01:43, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Nigerian Tulip International Colleges

message: 102.215.56.132 (talk) 10:12, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  SilverLocust 💬 23:40, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Nigerian Turkish International Colleges →  – DUE TO THE CHANGE IN THE NAME OF THE SCHOOL ... 105.112.6.143 (talk) 13:54, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  change of name 

message: * Requests to change an article's title should be submitted using the  template specifically as a controversial move request process requiring discussion amongst the wider community. 
* A controversial requested move typically takes about 7 days to complete. Before taking this step, please ensure that you are acquainted with the requested move process by thoroughly reviewing its procedures. More information can be found at requested moves.
Regards,  Spintendo  11:04, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 12-JUL-2023

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  SilverLocust 💬 23:40, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nigerian Turkish International Colleges →  – DUE TO THE CHANGE IN THE NAME OF THE SCHOOL ... 105.112.6.143 (talk) 13:54, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 July 2023
Talk:Bronx River Houses

message: This article is basically a copy paste of 
http://gis.nyc.gov/nycha/im/AddressMap.do Bronx river houses. Not granted this is just about the only place to find authentic reliable information, copy / pasting isnt allowed here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.202.93.55 (talk) 01:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Isnt she from here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.23.240.226 (talk) 23:30, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sonya Sotomayor
Talk:List of numbered Brooklyn streets

message: Though the article isn't tiny, it is small and has a narrow purview: Brooklyn streets, 1-101.  There isn't any article about the other street grids, for example the Alphabet Plain to the east of this grid, and how they clash and meld.  I propose to rename it as simply "Brooklyn streets", make the current article a section, and expand the new article with such material.  Jim.henderson (talk) 23:45, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Too small

message: I've tried to delink 86th Street, which has been deleted, and place the article text within the table, however everything I do seems to screw up the table formatting. The text of the deleted article is:
86th Street is a major four lane street in Brooklyn, New York, running from Shore Road in Bay Ridge to McDonald Avenue. East of 18th Avenue/Cristoforo Colombo Boulevard till 25th Avenue, the BMT West End Line 'el' tracks run overhead; the street loses one lane in each direction through this stretch in order to accommodate the track's pillars. The 86th Street station on the BMT Sea Beach Line is near the eastern end of this street. 
If this is added to the table, the edit summary should state it has come from the article 86th Street (Brooklyn) to comply with copyright. Espresso Addict (talk) 00:36, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 86th Street

message: All the numbered streets are in the article up to 71, and then the list randomly jumps to 86. Is there a reason for this, and should I edit it to contain the missing material? Fiveproductions (talk) 19:42, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  72-85 Streets are missing
Talk:Buffalo Niagara Region

message: This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses the Category:New York stub on the article page.
*If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
*If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the  above to the appropriate class and removing the stub template from the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SkiersBot (talk • contribs) 01:31, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Eelam War II

message: As stated they seem to be phases in an armed conflict, not individual wars in all aspects. Additionally, these articles seem to only talk about civilian massacres rather than the actions during the war; general battles and the like are not mentioned. Therefore, it is probably beneficial to simply merge the articles, but I will await an expert's opinion. AnyOwl (talk) 10:58, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Sri Lankan Civil War is extremely long. Splitting it into the various stages seems sensible but nobody seems to have put the time and effort into making Eelam War I, Eelam War II, Eelam War III and Eelam War IV encyclopedic articles. They have used them to score political points instead.--Obi2canibe (talk) 11:42, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

text: Understandable, I would love to put it together but I am no expert in this topic, not even close. Here's to hoping someone will undertake the task. Thanks for taking the time to reply. AnyOwl (talk) 18:17, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge the Eelam War Articles?
Talk:Utica Children's Museum

message: Please see the notices at the top of the page. Clearly a real-world feud has spilled over into this article. That is not acceptable. Frankly, I expect better from people who work in museums. You should know the importance of neutrality in reporting and recording of facts. When the newspaper in Utica writes about your museum, do they just let you write the article yourselves? I should hope not. I would suggest that you please suggest edits you would like to see here, on the talk page, and cease editing the article directly, allowing neutral third parties to evaluate those requests and keep the article free of bias. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:07, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest 

message: Greetings from Elizabeth Brando, executive director, Utica Children's Museum.  Thank you for your suggestions and instructions on how to keep our wiki entry complete and correct.  I ask that someone please correct the spelling of the word "museum" in the history section.  Ebrando (talk) 01:13, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I make a ton of typos, and sometimes when I'm using my wireless keyboard it seems to break my spellchecker. One of these days I'll figure out why that is... Beeblebrox (talk) 01:24, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request edit on 20 January 2016
Talk:Northern Theatre of Eelam War IV

message: I propose merging the battle of the FDL into here, as it seems that "battle" is a campaign and engulfing the whole north. Furthermore, there's no such sourced term Battle of the Forward Defence Lines --TheFEARgod (Ч) 16:36, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am against it, the Sri Lankan generals, who are leading this campaign, have called it on numereous times the final "battle" of the war, although not a good example because that's just propaganda. But, if you feal that "battle" is not the apropriate term and the term Battle of the Forward Defence Lines is not apropriate eather I have another proposal. Don't merge but change the name to something like for example 2008 SLA Northern offensive. I admite it is more of a campaign than a battle but it should not be merged into Northern Theater of Eelam War IV. Merge sections of it, but don't redirect this to that. It should remain as a distinct battle in the war as are the Helmand province campaign and the Diyala, Anbar and Ninawa campaigns in the Iraq and Afghan wars.89.216.236.45 (talk) 18:06, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: may be a good idea--TheFEARgod (Ч) 10:00, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge-from 
Talk:The Cardiff Team

message: I've looked closely at the article. My first question was regarding the notability of the book. The notability of the author is established. However, while this collection of stories has attracted some reviews, and incidental mentions in articles on the author, it may not pass an AfD discussion. Certainly the parent article, Guy Davenport, could handle discussion of Davenport's output quite comfortably without the need to spill out into a standalone article for this, and Apples and Pears, and it may be considered merging the best content of this and Apples and Pears back into Guy Davenport and putting redirects in place.
:I agree.  SocJan 22:30, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. SocJan 22:30, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Again, I am in agreement. SocJan 22:30, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

text: For the record: I will never object to a neutral description of a fictional work that includes reference to the sexuality of the fictional children, including instances in which that sexuality is observed or expressed with/by other fictional characters who are not themselves defined as children in legal statutes prevailing in our non-fictional real world. But I will object forever to any automatic characterization of such material as "child abuse" -- especially if the fiction in question includes nothing that fits the ordinary dictionary meaning of "abuse". As for "pedophilia", I find the subject so poorly defined and definable as to be a dubious subject by which to categorize fictions. My main objection has been to the portrayal of Davenport stories as showing "child sexual abuse", as Tony has repeatedly tried to assert. This characterization of his could not be further from a neutral, established, critical consensus. Besides being OR and NPOV, it happens to be wrong-headed. But I should not have to argue that. OR and NPOV violations should be sufficient to get such material taken out of Wikipedia. SocJan 22:30, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Third Opinion
Talk:Abraham Verhoeven

message: Can you tell me more about Abraham Verhoeven when did he died what year was he born how old is he before he died whats his wifes name how many children they had where did they live please?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.134.29.21 (talk) 09:43, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: He was born in 1575, died in 1652, was married twice (don't have the names or dates to hand) and had at least two children (perhaps more) by his first wife. I can flesh these details out more with reference to a couple of source, but not off-hand. Are you planning on improving the article? --Paularblaster (talk) 20:37, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  please help me answer my questions. 

message: http://www.gocomics.com/peanuts/1981/02/23  A2Kafir (and...?) 03:00, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misspelled reference in "Peanuts" of 1981