Talk:Tony Mooney

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mundingburra_state_by-election,_1996
I am asking that editors stop removing the information about him being a candidate at the Mundingburra by-election.
It is a fact that he was a candidate at that by-election and the editors who are removing this information have clearly little or no knowledge about this subject matter and will ask they cease and desist at that. If there is further tampering with my edit of this information I will consider it as harassment towards me. 220.239.167.151 (talk) 23:01, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want to add information to the article please cite a reliable source that actually makes the claims you are trying to add. If you want to add stuff like: "Davies ran as an independent in order to prove a point that he could have won if he had been retained as the ALP candidate.", then that must be backed by a reliable source. And Wikipedia is a community, if you thing that editing based on reliable sources and consensus is harassment, then you should not be editing Wikipedia. King of Nothing (talk) 07:16, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

text: This is getting ridiculous. There is no editor out to get you, no editor out to harass you, no editor that has anything against you at all. You don't own articles, and you can't dictate who can edit an article. You keep claiming that other editors know nothing about the subject and therefore shouldn't edit them. Well frankly, an editor doesn't have to know anything about a subject to know that Wikipedia policies are not being followed. When other editors try to explain this to you, it results in you attacking the editors, accusing others of harassing you, telling them not to edit the article again, and not to contact you again. Your contribution history clearly shows that this is nothing new, you have reacted with the same type behavior time-and-time again. When reverted, you take the same route everytime, attack the other editors and accuse them of harassment. If you think this is how Wikipedia works, then you have a very flawed view of Wikipedia. If you can't take constructive criticism, refuse to work with other editors, and resort to attacking those who try to help you, maybe Wikipedia isn't the best place for you. When you think of it, if there is any harassment going on here, it could appear to some that it's actually coming from you against other editors, not the other way around. 142.166.90.155 (talk) 21:13, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because there is other stuff on Wikipedia that violates policies and is not up to standards doesn't mean that you can keep re-adding information that violates basic policies, Other stuff exists and But it's true! is not justification for adding unsourced original research and edit warring. King of Nothing (talk) 23:14, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

text:  If you can't understand what original research is, then you should not be editing Wikipedia. The burden is not on me, the burden is on you. I don't have to remove every unsourced bit of content and every bit of original research to be able to remove the original research that you have added. You need to end the hostility and stop adding unsourced original research. King of Nothing (talk) 12:07, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tony Mooney contested the Mundingburra by-election