Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Western Sahara

message: Hello, I just happened to notice this page, and was wondering what membership in such a project would entail. Western Sahara and the plight of the Sahrawi have always been subjects of interest for me, and I beleive I would find helping with such a project enjoyable.Conrino 06:26, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Interest

message: Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory.  This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.  B2T2 15:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project directory 

message: Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 20:01, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Day Awards 

message: POV? If you have some suggestions to change this page radically, please list them. Otherwise, I founded this project, so I will revert it back to what I had previously. Why would you take off useful and relevant information (e.g. the to-do list)? -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 15:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The to-do list is there in the article not removed as you alledge. It is not because you create the project that you can write whatever you want in it. What you call useful information was a naked Pro-Polisario POV-pushing. If you find anything pro-Morocco POV or anti-Polisario, bring it to the talk page first.--A Jalil 15:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Contradiction Here's the contradiction: you want me to bring pro-Morocco bias to the talk page first, but you feel justified in deleting what you think is pro-Polisario bias without talking. Isn't that hypocritical? The template was, in fact, removed from the infobox, and that is plainly obvious. Why did you remove that? -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 15:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: POV There are other WikiProjects with flags of unrecognized countries, states, nationalist movements, etc: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Abkhazia, Wikipedia:WikiProject_Palestine, Wikipedia:WikiProject_Assyria, and Wikipedia:WikiProject_Ossetia, for instance. There is no POV requirement for the display of a flag on a WikiProject page. I'm re-starting this WikiProject, and I would appreciate it if you didn't vandalize the page with mass deletions, the removal of the template from the infobox, and bolding inappropriate categories to prove some political point. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 20:44, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV concerns 

message: * This page does not separate between WS and the "sadr".
* The "sadr" flag has nothing to here.
* All small visulas and templates must be cleaned out acordingly (WS is a territory that must be presented in neutral manner)
* I will action this step by step.
: wikima 21:29, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:WikiProject Morocco doesn't really separate between Morocco and Western Sahara, either.  It seems perversely balanced. ¦ Reisio 21:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is a wikiproject for Western Sahara, Reisio, not the SADR. I looked at the page for Wikipedia:WikiProject Morocco and there is not a single occurence of the words "Western Sahara" or Southern provinces. I think that is correctly done.--A Jalil 21:52, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yet you guys have Talk:Western Sahara marked as part of WikiProject Morocco - does that seem neutral to you? :p (rhetorical) ¦ Reisio 03:45, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Hello My name is Justin, and I founded this WikiProject. Did you read the title and scope sections? This is what the project is. If you want a different project, you can form one yourself, and I promise I will not change it around and mutilate it through entryism. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 23:53, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is ridiculous. All pages and projects in Wikipedia are founded by the community (started by one person), and no one claims ownership/patent/copyright of any thing here. If you think this is your property, then you either should change the naming to Wikiproject Justin Koavf, or find a place else than Wikipedia. As long as you claim this project is about Western Sahara, it is not yours. Sorry.--A Jalil 07:58, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right It is ridiculous to do things like, for instance, make links to Moroccan categories bold. Why did you do that? I'm not claiming ownership on my part, but entryism on yours. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 15:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: I believe this very unique culture, with a one-of-a-kind alphabet Tifinagh and history dating back as far as ancient Egypt, merits it's own WikiProject. There is a beautiful portal at Portal:Berbers, and I think Wikipedia would benefit greatly from this. Chris 02:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Berbers]]

message: Hello everyone! There is a discussion at List of countries by formation dates that concernes this wikiproject. It relates to the fact that some users include former colonies (such as Algeria or Western Sahara/Ifni) in the columm for the last territorial changes of their respective colonial power, and this because "formely" such colonies were considered "provinces". I believe this discussion and its result may interest you. Thank you! The Ogre (talk) 20:34, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Talk:List_of_countries_by_formation_dates#Algeria_a_French_province.3F_Well..._go_ask_the_Algerians.21.21.21|List of countries by formation dates]] 

message: It is my sincerest hope that this statement is not taken as being an attempt to subvert this project, take control over it, or any similar thing. However, the :Template:AfricaProject has recently had parameters put into it to allow it to provide separate assessments for all the "Africa" projects, including this one. If in the interests of reducing banner clutter the members of this project were to choose to use that banner, please let me know and I can adjust any categories accordingly to permit it. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 00:21, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project banner 

message: We're up and running! Please visit and contribute at Wikipedia:WikiProject Berbers! Thanks! Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 05:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: neighbor Wikipedia:WikiProject Berbers 

message: Template:AfricaProject was recently modified, and now contains individual parameters for all countries in Africa (see usage notes). Since project-specific assessment for all African countries can now be accomplished through the template, a proposal has been made at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Africa to consolidate all individual African country WikiProject banners.
Comments or suggestions would be most welcome. Thank you, Black Falcon (Talk) 23:30, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to consolidate African country WikiProject banners 

message: While doubtless pointless, I would note that the stated objective of standardisation and neutrality are rather in tension given some highly discussable "standard" references on terms - e.g. Sahrawi adopts a pointedly (and somewhat pointless in many ways) Polisario / Arab Leftist assertion on identity and state of society re the Western Saharan tribes. Empirically it is highly doubtful to assert tribe is no longer a referent in Saharan society, whether Western Sahara or other Saharan / Sahraoui peoples. Those referents should be modified or deleted. (collounsbury (talk) 17:30, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well that last edit is a start, glad to see some reasonableness now. But in no way enough to make a neutral overview or baseline. A review of the current Sahraoui society description which was expanded highlights the contradiction (never mind you have a comparative without a clear referant). (collounsbury (talk) 21:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay I'm happy to help; if you've got a better re-write, just go for it. I'm not concerned that you'll substantially damage the text. -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:49, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Then I will give it a go this weekend (collounsbury (talk) 14:44, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV bis 

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

message: When i saw the title and the flag of this article, I was a bit confused. There's no such thing as "Western Sahara (Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic)". Western Sahara and Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic are two different things. Western Sahara is a disputed territory mostly controlled by Morocco. So if we are talking about the territory, SADR flag should NOT be included in the article. While Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic is a government in exile, recognized by a few states.  So to be fair, the article should talk about one of those two things. And please, be neutral. Don't put neither Sadr's flag nor Morocco's flag Koumed (talk) 16:15, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Western Sahara and Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic 

message: This project really lack neutrality, and its maintainer does NOT respect Wikipedia policy. Just to remind Justin (koavf) who said "hello to a fellow supporter of the Sahrawi cause", we are not here to support Sahrawi or Moroccan cause, we give people information as it is. Someone should do something about that, Justin support SADR and this should NOT be tolerated. Plus he thinks he owns the project, and show not respect to other members' opinion. Most people think that project is pro-SADR, and nobody is taking any action. Koumed (talk) 02:20, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This project should be reported 

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:21, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Western Sahara 

message: An African cinema task force has been proposed at WikiProject Films, which would include the cinema of Western Sahara. Interested editors are encouraged to sign up - if there is enough interest, then the task force will be created! Many thanks, Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:05, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: African cinema task force

message: Hi!  I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate.  This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group.  If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:59, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinators' working group 

message: A proposal has been posted for a contest between all 200 country WikiProjects.  We're looking for judges, coordinators, ideas, and feedback.  
The Transhumanist  00:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal for a 200-WikiProject contest 

message: Can someone provide the Arabic script on this badge? :File:Scouts de Sahara.png Thank you! Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 16:20, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arabic text 

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 04:09, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: Okip   23:15, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced living people articles bot

message: Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone.  Articles were selected based on their assessed  importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Western Sahara articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details.  You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010.  As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide.  Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback! 
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:50, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Western Sahara articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release 

message: I have created together with Smallman12q a toolserver tool that shows a weekly-updated list of cleanup categories for WikiProjects, that can be used as a replacement for WolterBot and this WikiProject is among those that are already included (because it is a member of :Category:WolterBot cleanup listing subscriptions). See the tool's wiki page, this project's listing in one big table or by categories and the index of WikiProjects. Svick (talk) 20:43, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject cleanup listing 

message: The flag of the project is the SADR's flag. But Western Sahara is a territory in sovereignty dispute between Morocco and SADR. So the flag of the project must be either white or a mixed flag of Morocco and SADR (half-half) or something better : no flag and a map representing the Western Sahara territory instead. I'm saying this because the neutrality must be a rule in Wikipedia : the UN said the Western Sahara does not belong to Morocco nor SADR because of sovereignty dispute. Therefore no flags of any of these must be representing the project. Moroccan Sahara (talk) 02:43, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, it's highly inappropriate that the Sahrawi flag is plastered all over the place here, just as it would be if it were the Morocco flag. Wikipedia is not supposed to take a position on what country rightfully owns Western Sahara. Unless someone objects I'll begin removing these flags. To you Western Saharans, or Moroccans or Sahrawis, whatever you want to call yourselves: Wikipedia is not a battleground in your Western Sahara conflict. From now on anyone who wants to fight in that conflict, do it somewhere other then Wikipedia. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 09:38, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I would support that argument. (And, taking it a step further: Which flag actually flies over Western Sahara?) bobrayner (talk) 14:08, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I would think both the SADR and Morocco flags fly over Western Sahara, weather the Western Sahara belongs to the SADR or Morocco is disputed. De-facto, SADR controls the Free Zone (region) and Morocco controls the rest. To the best of my knowledge, there is no undisputed Western Sahara flag. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 02:37, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Flags flying The flag of Western Sahara/the SADR/Polisario, and the Moroccan one, and the UN flag, and probably a Spanish flag or two still. There are a lot of flags over there. None of them represent Western Sahara other than this one, though. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:46, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It represents the SADR, weather the SADR represents Western Sahara is disputed. Wikipedia has no opinion on weather it's the SADR or Morocco represent Western Sahara. When we must have a Western Sahara flag, we should probably use  or  but the vast majority of the time we don't need a flag, to unnecessarily use the SADR flag implies that SADR owns Western Sahara. Wikipedia:WikiProject North America is also about a peace of land and it does fine without a flag. The Western Sahara article doesn't have a flag in it's infobox. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 06:09, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

text: Flag That's simply untrue Emmette--the flag was designed prior to the designation of the SADR. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:14, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's still the SADR flag, my point stands. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 07:20, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

text: My point is that it isn't an undisputed Western Sahara flag, if it is why doesn't Western Sahara and Flag of Western Sahara list it as the flag of Western Sahara. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 07:27, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

text: No not Bold textirrelevant kid, very bloody relevant. As it happens the current [2016] version of Palestine project has no national flags at all. That looks to me to be good practice. Abkhazia, frankly no one cares about. This and Palestine get lots of activist attention. As I happen to visit the geography in question, it is easly reported that 75% or so of the territory is the Moroccan flag flying. The rump of course sans doubt has Polisario's flag. And no spanish flags - except when you're at a hotel where you've got every bloody country flag they can possibly put out in front to show how "international" they are. 
The project, if it is anything but a thinkly disguised partisan political project, should not put out front a partisan flag. Simple as that. collounsbury (talk) 12:28, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag of the project 

message: Hello WikiProject Western Sahara editors! Your comment is requested over at Talk:Flag of Western Sahara; there is an RfC underway there to help decide what the article contents should be. (There are a few different options, such as redirection, disambiguation, etc.) If you can take some time to share your opinion on the matter, it would be very much appreciated. — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 15:07, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments requested at Flag of Western Sahara 

message: How can I contribute to this project
GameOverTown (talk) 15:20, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  How 

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: User:Dr. Blofeld has created Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/Contests. The idea is to run a series of contests/editathons focusing on each region of Africa. He has spoken to Wikimedia about it and $1000-1500 is possible for prize money. Would anybody here be interested in contributing to one or assisting draw up core article/missing article lists? He says he's thinking of North Africa for an inaugural one in October. If interested please sign up in the participants section of the Contest page, thanks.♦ --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 20:03, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contests 

message: Dawynn (talk) 18:36, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{cl|Sahrawi people stubs}} and {{cl|Sahrawi politician stubs}} deletion discussion 

message: The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.
Portals are being redesigned.
The new design features are being applied to existing portals.
At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template .
The discussion about this can be found here.
Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass.  Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.
=== Background ===
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    08:00, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject collaboration notice from the [[WP:WPPORT|Portals WikiProject]] 

message: On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    08:00, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background 

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether :Portal:Western Sahara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Western Sahara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 03:07, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[:Portal:Western Sahara]] for deletion 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: I've started a discussion at :Template talk:Ethnic groups in Western Sahara#SADR flag neutrality issue. Posting here to possibly gain broader input on the issue, and also as reference given the broadness of the issue of SADR symbolism being used to represent this disputed territory across Wikipedia.
Rob984 (talk) 17:21, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion relating to the issue SADR flag use on ''Western Sahara'' templates in respect of [[WP:NPOV]] 

message: Hello, can anyone link me to a reliable source with information on Western Sahara's national anthem? I am looking for the composer and/or lyricist as well as date of official adoptions so that I can improve List of national anthems. Thanks in advance!  MSG17 (talk) 00:34, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anthem of Western Sahara 

message: Hi, all. I just wanted to flag that there is a lot of work to do on the article for current war (2020 Western Saharan clashes), and on making sure that the article is properly linked to from other pages on Wikipedia. I've done what I could over the last several weeks to clean up the lead and the background section, but the rest of the article is incomplete and leans heavily on propagandistic Moroccan sources. Come help out! --JECE (talk) 20:52, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  2020 Western Saharan clashes 

message: Hosted by the Wikimedia Community User Group Uganda, the first ever virtual Wiki Indaba conference is taking place online from the 5th to the 7th of November 2021 under the theme Rethink + Reset : Visions of the future. 
Wiki Indaba 2021 is a unique opportunity to come together to build the capacity of African Wikimedians both within the continent and the diaspora to foster the growth of the coverage and our involvement in Wikimedia projects. 
The call for submissions is open, please submit your session proposal either as a presentation, panel discussion, lightning talk, or workshop before September 24th 2021.
Most importantly, we would like to have you at the conference, please register here to get your free ticket and spread the word to your community members.
Looking forward to seeing you and hearing you speak at the conference.
Geoffrey Kateregga (talk) 23:45, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki Indaba 2021 is here! 

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources 

message: Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a  parameter to , which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to , and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass  a new  parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 22:31, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project-independent quality assessments 

message: Could you help to disambiguate links to Law enforcement in Western Sahara? There are over 50 articles (shown at Disambig fix list for Law enforcement in Western Sahara) which link to the dab page. It would be useful to readers if these linked to a more specific article and it is not always clear which article is most appropriate. Any help appreciated — Rod talk 17:37, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation of links to Law enforcement in Western Sahara 

message: Hello WikiProject Western Sahara: 
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a  month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts. 
We hope to see you there!
Grnrchst (talk) 13:59, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women in Green's 5th Edit-a-thon 

message: Hi all, I understand that I am new to this topic on Wikipedia but I am profusely confused by the maps of the conflict popularised on the pages under this topic, even including the logo of the topic. There is a wealth of sources that clarify the berms cross over the Mauritanian border (A couple examples of: Zunes, S. et al (2010) 'Western Sahara : War, Nationalism, and Conflict Irresolution'; this map here shared by the USC; another map on Wikipedia including the 2020 berm.) The current maps seem to all suggest that the Polisario territory is not split up by the berms, which I cannot see has been questioned despite the conflicts in some sources.
As such, I would like to bring up a discussion for the sake of whether all the maps should be corrected to include new information (the 2020 berm) and fix berms not crossing over into Mauritania.
Regards Quinby (talk) 11:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This has come up in at least one other discussion semi-recently, but I think there is a problem with there not being enough reliable map sources. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Koavf The berm is visible from Google's satellite imagery (e.g., 25°58'28.3"N 11°59'50.5"W), which seems like enough of a source to reject the maps currently in place. The wiki map I shared above seems to be the most accurate relative to the satellite imagery, so potentially it could be adapted and used instead, especially following the 2020 berm. Quinby (talk) 09:17, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential Errors in Popularised Maps 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Western Saharan clashes (2020–present)#Requested move 6 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Lolekek (talk) 05:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Western Saharan clashes (2020–present)#Requested move 6 February 2024]] 

message: Starting this July, we will see a new contest on the scene - the Developing Countries WikiContest (WP:DCWC)! Think of it as a WikiCup but only for articles and media on developing countries. 
Competitors may submit GAs, GTs, FAs, FTs, FLs, FPs, and DYK and ITN entries from/on developing countries to gain points and proceed to further rounds. Points are also awarded to those who review GAs, FAs and FLs.
Western Sahara is listed as a least-developed country for the purposes of this contest, which means Western Sahara-related and SADR/Polisario-related submissions to the contest will get a multiplier in points. I encourage everyone here to sign up and compete with editors from around the world to create high-quality content! 
Append your name to the DCWC signup page today! 
Best wishes, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (talk to me!/my edits) 04:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:DCWC|Developing Countries WikiContest]]