Talk:Yasin Hassan Omar

message: This artice, despite being rather amusing, adds nothing to Wilkpedia's academic credibility.
Shouldn't this be at Wikinews?
* Doesn't it qualify as a short biographical profile? --68.239.153.119 15:04, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Regarding Sir Ian Blair's exclamation: what exactly was the 'incredible risk' of using a stungun? ie, was it dangerous for the police or the suspect in his view?
:ok, found my answer here . article ammended appropriately. --81.154.236.221 23:36, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: An incredible risk

message: Sandpiper 08:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've updated the article to include what I can find, mainly that he pleaded no guilty and that his fiancée was arrested to. In this article on the BBC News site, it says he was due to stand trial sometime w/c 9th October, but I can find nothing at all on him after that. If anybody can find something I'm missing (it is quarter past 4 here at the moment) that would be great. It doesn't help that the BBC decided at some arbitrary point to start spelling his name 'Yassin' and leaving out the 'Hassan'. Lawful Hippo 04:18, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: So what happened to him after being arrested a year ago?

message: Would somebody like to tell me exactly what those are because I've been fairly meticulous in making sure everything is cited back to a reliable news source. I'd also challenge the expand and wikify tags to a degree, because I honestly don't believe there is much scope to expand this article - its not like this is ever likely to be the kind of biography to Julius Caesar, we just don't have the information. And I can't see a lot wrong with its quality, and I charge that boxes like the wikify one are terribly unhelpful without some explanation on the talk page about WHAT is wrong with the article.
I'm quite willing to hear someone out if they believe the boxes should stay. Lawful Hippo 16:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited sources? 

message: :Image:21 July 2005 London explosions suspect2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:04, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:21 July 2005 London explosions suspect2.jpg