lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kerala Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation

message: Someone is trying to edit this page as an IP User (122.178.238.165). I have reverted their edits because they are destroying useful information, while attempting to add useful info. This editor should understand what a {reflist} is, before removing it. Also, there is a convention that the subject of the article appears in bold on the first line. Try adding you material without degrading the article. Regards --Greenmaven (talk) 05:19, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misguided editor 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://msmedithrissur.gov.in/secure/admin/writereaddata/Documents/SSFile163011818139.pdf (PDF page 38). Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  John of Reading (talk) 07:19, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Zeke Moore (American football)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. per consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) echidnaLives - talk - edits 03:09, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Zeke Moore →  – no clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC Joeykai (talk) 00:41, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 January 2023
Talk:Ball turret

message: How did the gunner rotate the turret? Drutt (talk) 17:28, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Control

message: Most dangerous bomber post?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.119.2.126 (talk) 04:35, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Tail-gunner would be the most obvious rival - attacking a bomber from below was relatively tricky until schragemusik became a common thing. 62.196.17.197 (talk) 16:37, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Most Dangerous?

message: A section on people who actually did this job - aces and ordinary joes etc. would be good. Rcbutcher (talk) 15:40, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Prominent ball turret gunners ?
Talk:Puerto Rico at the 1948 Summer Olympics

message: To the extent of our research and interview of the person who carried the flag, Puerto Rico National Delegation to the 1948 Olympics held in London used Puerto Rico's Coat of Arms and not the flag of the United States as indicated in this article. That is the flag that was used during the delegation's participation in the Games' inauguration ceremony. Would appreciate it if others may comment or address this issue. Thank you very much, best regards  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RICO PUERTO RICO (talk • contribs) 01:04, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:FNFL

message: Please DO NOT Redirect this page!!
: This page was redirected by community decision ; see User talk:Leelad93 and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FNFL (American football).Not only should FNFL be a redirect, but the information about an American football fantasy league does not belong on Wikipedia. Modifying this article again breaks links in Free French-related articles and will only result in FNFL page being protected. Rama 02:52, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Romania at the 1992 Summer Olympics

message: gu efhjhuj hd hfdfjdlhi hi hih hih djfi nd  jiyfhjlnshufffjfjsjsdf sujsdfjljkfj jadfj jdfjkdj a;jdjfjdjfl jdljf lahdflhladf4jemj fj  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.232.244.155 (talk) 18:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Metaknowledge

message: I tagged this article for buzzwords.  An opening like:
:Metaknowledge or meta-knowledge is knowledge about knowledge. More precisely speaking, meta-knowledge is systemic problem and domain-independent knowledge which performs or enables operations on another more or less specific domain-dependent knowledge in different domains/areas of human activities.
makes me really wonder whether this is an article in search of something to be about. - Smerdis of Tlön 00:40, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah it's such a buzzword that the journal Science thought it necessary to define the broad topic https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1201765 Generalist1 (talk) 03:39, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

message: The DMOZ search template, and by implication all DMOZ search links, is being considered for deletion because it violates WP:ELNO #9. Anyone interested in discussing the fate of Open Directory Project (DMOZ) search links is invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:Dmoz2. Qazin (talk) 05:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open Directory Project Links 

message: This article has potential, but needs both cleanup, better in-line references, and accessible to new readers. Anyone willing to take a stab at improving this article? Harvey the rabbit (talk) 01:28, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 14 years ago! Generalist1 (talk) 03:39, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone willing to take a stab at improving this article? 

message: The TOGA metatheory is completely unknown on the four best universities:
http://search.cam.ac.uk/web?query=TOGA+metatheory     => no results
http://www.harvard.edu/searches/?searchtext=TOGA+metatheory    => no results
http://web.mit.edu/search.html    TOGA+metatheory     => no results
http://www.yale.edu/     TOGA+metatheory    => no results  Vikom (talk) 00:23, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleted again, after 5 years. We should remain vigilant. 85.193.242.133 (talk) 04:38, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why I have deleted the TOGA metatheory 
Wikipedia talk:Notability (doctors)

message: There are pages suggesting various tests of notability.  This page was created because of suggestions that a doctor was or was not notable.  It is possible that it could be merged with one of the others, or indeed all the professional notability pages could be merged back into _people_, however it seems as unlikely that one page will fit everyone as that a separate set of tests is needed for every discipline.  THe pragmatic line lies somewhere in between.  Such disputes are not common on WP, so references to this are not going to be frequent - one a year doesn't seem surprising.  213.221.231.114 00:41, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Kottapuram

message: There's a July proposal to merge Kottappuram, Thrissur to here, as they seem to be the same place (alternative transliteration) and this is the older article. However, the sources all seem to use the double-p spelling, so I suggest that the merge be to Kottappuram, Thrissur. Klbrain (talk) 18:17, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 12:34, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Agenesis

message: Has anyone had any knowledge of someone born without a kidney?  unilateral renal agenesis, I believe it is called?  What kinds of problems could be caused by this?  Thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.32.117.72 (talk) 00:41, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Providing the single kidney is healthy, none. However, such a person should take iron tablets, and anything else a kidney donor would normally take. HairyWombat 00:57, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kidney
Talk:Nonpartisan Bloc for Cooperation with the Government

message: Can we move this to Non-partisan Block of Collaboration with the Government? --Irpen 00:42, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As soon as you show this is the most popular English translation of the Polish name, yes.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  00:55, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Perhaps asking for input at WP:PWNB would be useful.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  02:53, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nonpartisan Bloc for Cooperation with the Government is pretty well established . M0RD00R 21:35, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Better translation. I withdraw my objection to moving the article.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  22:10, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Makaravilakku

message: makaravilakku, as the name expresses the idea of manually lighting deepam.But it is not known to the laypeople.So it is necessary to communicate and educate them for avoiding superstitious thoughts.The great almighty LORD AYYAPPA has the prominence in the mind of devotees without this artificially created phenomenon.Our predecessors told us another story regarding makaravilakku,that at that time when makarasamkranthi happens, in ponnamabalamedu the adivasi gothra celebrates their devotional acharam.Then htey lit deepa in connenction with their celebration.The devoties of THELORD AYYAPPA belive that the deepa glows there, was the blessing of Ayyappa.This belief makes nothing wrong to the society and they gets more courage wille seeing the makaradeepam.But now devotees are in a manner to believe this as superstitious,and ready to loose their lifes for getting the view of makaradeepam.This is ridiculas and  come the necesity of awaring them to avoid calamities.I think this superstitious thought now keeps for, only the business of travancore devaswom board.so it is very much essencial to aware the devotees the right message unless the future will treat this as a criminal ignorance.GOPAKUMARGOVINDANNAIR  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Va4712454640 (talk • contribs) 08:40, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid I don't understand what you want. Do you want to add facts to the article? Can you supply a reliable source? I'm willing to help, but I don't follow. --Muhandes (talk) 10:46, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Melamuri

message: I don't pretend to be an expert on Tamil-Malayalam culture, but this entry seems to promote one class/caste over another. Could someone more familiar with the subject matter please check it? Thank you. Wperdue (talk) 15:23, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I live at a stone's throw from this locality. This article is basically self-glorification by the editors who are presumably from the same community and locality. Except for the fact that it is populated by a traditionally business based caste who have Tamil links, rest of the article is purely nonsense. I would suggest deletion of the article if no real facts are presented with verifiable sources rams81 (talk) 10:59, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality of [[Moothanthara]]
Talk:GPT Group

message: Sorry for creating a sub-stub here. I have flagged it for attention with other editors who may be more in tune with the Australian corporate climate than myself. Orderinchaos78 15:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Como não estragar legumes de folhas rápido 200.9.22.28 (talk) 02:58, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Como não deixar legumes de folhas ruins
Talk:Ukrainian Australians

message: Is this a good title? I really dislike it — it seems like very poor English to me, as it is 2 adjectives joined together, without a noun, and without a subject!
Wouldn't it be better to give it the title: Ukrainians in Australia? This would be consistent with many of the other pages that are in the "Ukrainian diaspora" category. --Pkravchenko (talk) 00:12, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Even better, all categories listing people's ethnicity have now been standardised in Wikipedia as: ...people of...descent. So the category for this page is now: :Category:Australian people of Ukrainian descent. I therefore think this page should then be called Australian people of Ukrainian descent --Pkravchenko (talk) 02:53, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 
Talk:Indo-Greek Kingdom/Archive 2

message: What a fantastic article.  Are the authors aiming to nominate it as a Featured article? -- ALoan (Talk) 11:16, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the comments! Actually several related articles are already FA, such as Greco-Buddhism and History of Buddhism, where the Indo-Greeks are mentionned. Indo-Greeks still needs a little more work (as far as I know most of the available data is pretty much in there, but I guess the flow of the article still has to be smoothened). It's also a lot of work to get an FA through! (usually one week of intense editing to answer all voter's comments and requests): I will try to see when my next window of opportunity is. Thanks! PHG 22:40, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FAC|Featured article candidates]]

message: This article was originally given BC/AD dates. I was told (after previously editing the BCEs on a different page) that it causes alot of controverse on wikipedia and the best policy is to keep it with the dates given from it's creation. Well folks this is BC/AD...and I'll revert, and get every user I can think of to view this  page. Thank you, Chooserr
:Hi Chooser. I am the original creator of this article, and have been developing it consistently beyond its original stub state along the BCE/CE format. This choice became all the more obvious as many linked subjects have nothing to do with "Anno Domini/ Year of the Lord" concepts (Buddhism, Indian kingdoms etc...). Within the BC/AD-BCE/CE debate I clearly have a preference for the progressiveness of the latter, especially where cultural sensitiveness is required. Best regards. PHG 22:40, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ye ole BC/AD 

message: The article appears well-written and would no doubt be a good FA bet. However, I was wondering if some text in the intro can talk of Alexander's exploits in India as an inspiration to the Indo-Greek kingdom. --Gurubrahma 07:07, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alexander 

message: The section on astronomy gives a misleading impression since the Yavanajataka is primarily a work of astrology, and incidentally contains the astronomy needed to calculate horoscopes.  I would also refer to Pingree's introduction to this work for information on three periods of Greek emigration to India. Zeusnoos 15:05, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yavanajataka 

message: I recently added a brief condensation of the history of Alexander's campaigns in India.
I'm also interested to know if it has been decided somewhere that Dr. AK Narain's treatise on the Indo-Greeks would be disregarded in favor Tarn's?
-Antialcidas, hehe - love the whimsical nomenclature (unsigned comment by Antalcidas)
:I've removed your edits because they were in the wrong place: this article speaks of the Indo-Greek kingdom started much later than Alexander.--Aldux 23:49, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alexander and Narain
Talk:Pathadipalam

message: Pathadipalam is more popular spelling used and this article must be moved to Pathadipalam.Dear , why you proposed a deletion insted of moving this page?  --Ranjithsiji (talk) 12:00, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: As I stated in the Proposed deletion - we currently have Draft:Pathadipalam. This stub is not ready for mainspace but because there is already a draft with that name, it is better to simply delete this article and prepare the draft for mainspace.  Also, once an acceptable article has been submitted, Pathadipalam metro station needs to be merged into the main article. Atsme 📣 📧 12:07, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Then what happens to the contribution of the people from 2006 into this article. Just go into trash?? Is that acceptable?? Is this way wikipedia thinks ? I am not recommending that. Just merging that draft into this article seems OK for me. Not a delete. Now a days english wikipedia has more deletions and bad delete practices than welcoming and preserving users. I am against for this proposal. --Ranjithsiji (talk) 15:17, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it was barely a legible paragraph, not an encyclopedic article when I prodded it - worse yet, the title is misspelled, it has stayed that way for 12+ years, and now someone else is attempting to create an article with the correct spelling in draft space. The prod notice at the top of the page provides the necessary steps to take if you want to keep the article. Happy editing! Atsme 📣 📧 15:49, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Is these are the explanation or reasons for putting someones effort on trash?? I don't feels like it as a welcoming experience. It is the unhappy editing way. If we don't have an option then we can consider it. Still we can merge, move and other ways. And putting efforts of people into trash is defenitly not the right way. I am not supporting that. If you want to do go ahed. And the other one is a person in the event organized by me. I helped that person to create that draft. And you people must handle these complicated drafts. Not so happy editing. Feeling very bad. :( --Ranjithsiji (talk) 16:20, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of place
Talk:Soviet Decree

message: Hi! Thanks for creating this article; it looks like a lot of work. I have trouble understanding the paragraph right before the heading List of Soviet decrees. Could you rephrase it a little bit? DoorsAjar 00:59, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi and thanks for copyediting. I didn't create the article. Prior to my edits the article contained info, which is in the first section now. Hence, I have no ideas on the paragraph in question. I just compiled the second section ("List of Soviet Decrees") and wrote the lead. As to that paragraph, I don't know, maybe we should request citations, adding  tags there? Cmapm 11:16, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:UBIGEO

message: It would be useful to indicate in what contexts UBIGEO is used. For example, is it used in addresses, when sending a letter or identifying a building? Ajmasz (talk) 16:56, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage
Talk:Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford

message: I want to mention that IMHO  this particular department is historically notable; what the article needs is considerable expansion, discussing the work done there and the fame of the dept. There should be sources.DGG (talk) 09:52, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I realise it says that Mark is still department head on the website but that has not been updated to show recent events. Francis Barr has been promoted to Department Head permanently from his previous Deputy Head role. They should update this on the website soon.  Linkiscool99 (talk) 17:39, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New department head
Talk:University of Oxford Botanic Garden

message: Is there a way we can merge the Oxford Botanic Garden page with the Harcourt Arboretum page as well. The two sites have since become 'Oxford Botanic Garden and Arboretum' given how much time has lapsed since these pages have been reviewed. VictoriaWebb1621 (talk) 09:21, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's entirely possible, it depends whether the arboretum is independently notable. Typically once notability is established that doesn't change, but it may make sense to treat the topic in its entirety here. At the very least, I'm sure it would be worth doing more signposting between the page. This might be a matter for a wider discussion involving more people, perhaps a Request for Comment - they're designed to invite comment on a topic from the Wikimedia community. Richard Nevell (talk) 19:11, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, and I will add signposting in due course as suggested. VictoriaWebb1621 (talk) 13:58, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Harcourt Arboretum
Talk:Terrestrial plant

message: I found this on the article below the stub and, since it's disorganized and looks like someone's class notes, moved it here until someone who knows plants can deal with it.
* Terrestrial: plants rooted in soil or mud along an edge or bank of freshwater
* Terrestrial: The air will not hold up plant structures in the way water does. It doesn’t get enough water. 
* Types of Terrestrial plants: elodea 
* Terrestrial plants often develop deep root systems for the uptake of water and nutrients; stems are usually rigid because of the development of scleretized cells in the tissues; the leaves contain a cuticle and thickness which prevents water loss. A waxy coating may also exist on the surface of the cuticle which gives a bloom to stems. They can be armed in various ways such as sharp thorns, spines or prickles to prevent grazing.
J. Spencer 01:13, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unwikified material

message: is a agrikulture in our planet because if we dont have plants we will die
thank you mga ta nga  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.203.11.108 (talk) 11:34, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  plants  

message: please tell me the names of few terristrial plants  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucky1gill (talk • contribs) 18:20, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  terristrial plants