Talk:Minke whale

message: I would split this into the different types of behavior from the minke whale. Behavior could be a topic heading and then section it off into sub-topics such as dive behavior and reproduction. Other topics to be added to this section could include preferred foraging strategies and socialization.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nazarioe11 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Behavior

message: I think this article still needs some work to bring it up to Good Article standards. For an idea of what it could look like, see Blue Whale. There is almost enough material present here, but it needs some additions, along with some wikification and referencing.
*The lead section should be fuller and more descriptive.
*Taxonomy section requires proper citations. It might also cover evolution of the species.
*Physical characteristics could be expanded, but also requires some citations
*Population and distribution section is largely unwikified, makes citations without following the right format, and could do with being rewritten for clarity.
** Note: a 95% confidence interval is a range of two values (e.g., given this sample, there is a 95% confidence that the population parameter will be within those values). The population is only given as one value. --Jeffmcneill 10:28, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed Good Article Candidate

message: In contrast to the spectacularly acrobatic Humpback Whale, Minkes do not raise their fluke out of the water when diving and are less likely to breach (jump clear of the sea surface). This, combined with the fact that Minkes can dive under water for as long as twenty minutes, has led some whale-watching enthusiasts to label them 'stinky Minkes'.
I don't understand the logic. Why would this lead them to be so labelled? Perhaps more detail is required. Ordinary Person 01:43, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *I don't know. Does anybody else have an answer?—GalacticExplorer 03:42, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Some Minkies are known as "seekers" and will quite often come very close to boats - their breath leaves a LOT to be desired, this is the main reason why they get labeled with stinky minkies ;) .... It´s breath releated basically .. so there you have it - it´s anecdotal though SammytheSeal 05:40, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

text: At least in the northeast, Minke's sometimes do have the nickname "stinky Minke".  This is because most whale-watching operators offer a refund if no whales are encountered.  And Minkes are common, but not as spectacular or exciting to see as humpbacks.  So encountering a Minke voids the refund possibility without being quite what many whale-watchers were hoping for.  Hence the nickname.Rlendog (talk) 17:00, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stinky minkes 

message: The article on "common minke whale" overlaps a lot with this article, I think that's quite bad.  I haven't checked up how much differences there is between the antartic and arctic subspecies, but maybe all three articles should be merged?  Alternatively, edit all three articles to drop all overlapping, and add clear and visible references between them?
I was searching for information on "what do Minke Whales eat" and "how much mercury (Hg) is there in the meat from minke whale?".  Eventually, I found some answers, but since I don't know what article it's best to add it to, I skip it as for now.
For the reference, through the Norwegian articles http://www.imr.no/__data/page/6538/3.3.6_Hval.pdf and http://folk.uib.no/hsk021/oppgaver.htm I find that not so much research have been done on what the arctic Minke Whale is eating (that's really a surprise, considering all the "research catches" that was done before Norwegian officially resumed commercial whaling!), but some research indicates that during the summer season it eats approx 1/3 of plankton, 1/3 of herring, and 1/3 of other small fishes.
As for the mercury containt of whale meat, there also seems to be a lack of research and information, but through private emails I've found that some samples have returned 0.2 micro grams of Hg pr kg of meat for Norwegian commercial meat.  The "safe" limit is considered to be between 0.1 μg/kg and 1.0 μg/kg depending on whom one asks and how much one eats (official limits for most fish in the EU is 0.5 μg/kg, official limits for commercially sold fish in the US is 1.0 μg/kg).  The email also referenced that other whale species caught around the Faeroe Islands had far higher levels.
tobixen (talk) 22:24, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlapping articles 

message: I made and then reverted some spelling changes. I have the rules on naming marine mammals/whales worked out now. Apologies for mistakes.(Littleolive oil (talk) 23:11, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Minke whale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110812073710/http://bed2.gremm.org/eng/pag.php?PagRef=Nws&NwsId=4475 to http://bed2.gremm.org/eng/pag.php?PagRef=Nws&NwsId=4475
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:49, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Most European languages are phonetic. The name Meinke seems German. The 'e' at the end of Meinke and Minke would be pronounced as 'e' in egg, not 'i' as in pig.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.129.96.75 (talk) 06:34, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: Most European languages are phonetic. The name Meinke seems German. The 'e' at the end of Meinke and Minke would be pronounced as 'e' in egg, not 'i' as in pig.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.129.96.75 (talk) 06:35, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Minke whale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120127220325/http://www.acsonline.org/factpack/MinkeWhale.htm to http://www.acsonline.org/factpack/MinkeWhale.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:17, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Minke whale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304025336/http://www.cosewic.gc.ca/eng/sct1/SearchResult_e.cfm?commonName=Minke+whale&scienceName=&Submit=Submit to http://www.cosewic.gc.ca/eng/sct1/SearchResult_e.cfm?commonName=Minke+whale&scienceName=&Submit=Submit
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: Bubblesorg (talk) 14:08, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minke whale photo 

message: Currently the article reports the 2004 population estimate (Minke_whale#Population_and_conservation_status). This is seriously out of date. At the provided link, reports up to 2018 are available. However, they are prepared in the best tradition of scientific committee reports, i.e., TONS of verbiage. I have been unable to extract current numbers from the most recent one without investing more time than I have available. If someone wants to burrow in and get these numbers out, that would be appreciated :) --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:15, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whaling commission estimates out of date 

message: Could someone please answer this?
Could some one please help? Thanks.--Bubblesorg (talk) 23:56, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: As the article states, there are two closely related species both called minke whales, primarily because they were originally considered conspecific. As such, it is an informal group (since they have not been classified as a subgenus). Please don't go "fixing" this all over the article now though; it's made quite clear by the current text. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:24, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Is it a species complex, or some other clade then?  If so, the manual  should be upgraded to an .  If it is only a grade, then an automated  box should be used.  I think either change could be applied without rocking the boat on the rest of the article.  The question could also be posed for the only other article in WikiProject Cetaceans using a manual taxobox, Bryde's whale. --Nessie (talk) 04:48, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are Minke whale even a taxon or an informal grouping? 

message: , I'm getting the impression you didn't quite get the point. There is no conservation status in the box because "minke whale" covers two species one of which is rated Least Concern and one (now) Near Threatened. Hence putting "LC" into the box is misleading. The material is treated in the text. Also, that stuff had not been updated (to 2018) assessment, so just hitting revert here is not only missing the point but actively preventing the provision of up-to-date information. Clear now? --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:10, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I mean, to level a poorly veiled accusation at Elmidae of being a Japanese government whaling shill solely because one is adamant in refusing to understand that taxa encompassing two or more distinct species, as is the situation with minke whales, do not receive conservation status for what should be obvious logistical problems is not Elmidae's personal failing, among other things.--Mr Fink (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  current IUCN status and box