Talk:Natasha Hamilton

message: Far be it from me to criticise anyone's artistic ability, I wonder if we should use the actual photograph of Natasha in the infobox rather than the sketch?  Budgiekiller 14:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is nothing available which is free (except for of a course non-commercial picture. I tell you disallowing non-commercial pictures makes it impossible to find copyleft pictures) and there is no single cover either, because nothing has been released. And some are starting to get paranoid about screen captures as well, so I prefer to move to appropriate place before people start to delete that stuff again. KittenKlub 18:15, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

text: If you also remove fansites then that chance isclose to zero. Try working with people and not against them.KittenKlub 19:37, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Bullshit. At least one fan site is allowed and especially calling rubbish is what is wrong with your behavior! KittenKlub 20:27, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Do you have nothing better to do than labelling everything people do rubbish? I think you have a serious additude problem! KittenKlub 20:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

text: And read the fucking rules before you start your crusades!! KittenKlub 20:31, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

text: You started it by insulting people left and right. And the fan site offers a lot more than an official site and it is not my site. And the site is allowed and stays. KittenKlub 20:38, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

text: First you insult my sketch and then you insult sites with people made with love and then YOU talk about civility? KittenKlub 20:44, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

text: And fansites are not fancruft. They serve a legitimate purpose as an additional information source. Dozens of them should be avoided, but a couple are no problem whatsoever and help to compliment the article. In fact most people first visit a fansite before the official site, because they contain more and better information. KittenKlub 20:47, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

text: You said ""not to criticise, but..." is the typical way to critize somebody. I decide to donate it because at least it was free, and you even call it a dangerous precedent. Look at Spice Girls. The biggest girl group has no picture despite google and amazon stretching the definition of fair use to extremely wide nowadays. And there is more to that site than "What does the name Tash mean?!" and sites are supposed to be fun as well, so let them add that. And if you get yourself a real browser you'd never see pop-ups again. KittenKlub 21:00, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

text: It isn't a precedent BTW. Madonna had a painting for months for the exactly same reason, because it was the only copyleft image. And uploading their version is what this site will become if they keep on restricting the rules, because so many new users have lots of messages about their images nowdays, because it is completely and totally unclear and nobody is helping them; it's just incomprehensible bot messages. So if you don't agree, find a copyleft image to replace it, because that's the deal. KittenKlub 21:16, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

text: It's cool again. Well soccer players have the same problem, and the only images you can find of them without royalties, are screen captures. Images remain a problem, because the infoboxes which are now standard, invite people to upload pictures. Be gentle on fansites, because they are the people most likely to update wikipedia. Delete all lyrics site, because those aren't real sites, since it is just a scam on the online advertisers, but fansites are the target audience for updating WP as far as the music sections go. And for sub top artists, it will just be a couple of sites, and it'll never become a link farm. KittenKlub 22:06, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The 'sketch'

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Natasha Hamilton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120218200057/http://strictmochine.blogspot.com/2005_09_01_archive.html to http://strictmochine.blogspot.com/2005_09_01_archive.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:45, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Natasha Hamilton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20121201020443/http://www.rearoftheyearcompetition.com/history.html to http://www.rearoftheyearcompetition.com/history.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:48, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified