lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gerry House

message: I am going to clean up this article. Things like- "They got married in 1974 and had one daughter, Autumn, who has followed her father's footsteps into music, and now works at Capitol Records in Nashville after working as a song plugger for Reba McEntire's company and Madonna's Maverick Records." sound like Fancruft and have no sources. A majority of this article has no sources and reads like it was written by a fan or family members. I will work and check this article daily to improve it. If anyone would like to help feel free to help me.--99.177.250.140 (talk) 01:45, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 

message: I am removing the following. 1) "His mother (who died in 1997) was a homemaker and his father (who died in 1989) was an electrician. As well as Gerry, Homer and Lucille raised a daughter who was 13 years Gerry's senior."
There are no sources for this and what is his sister's name who is "13 years his senior"?
2)House met his future wife, Allyson Faulkner, at elementary school in Walton, Kentucky. House was 3 years her senior.
Again,no sources and reads as Fancruft.
3)They got married in 1974 and had one daughter, Autumn, who has followed her father's footsteps into music, and now works at Capitol Records in Nashville after working as a song plugger for Reba McEntire's company and Madonna's Maverick Records.
Again,no sources and again Fancruft. This reads like a publicist wrote it.
4)"In the early 1980s, WSIX-FM, a pioneer country music-formatted FM outlet, became the market's leading country station, and the station appointed House to host a new morning show."
No sources and "pioneer and "leading country station" sounds biased. Also there is nothing in the article to back up the station was a "pioneer" and the "markets leading country station".
5)"The House Foundation was split up in 1985 when House left for a WSIX competitor, WSM-AM, citing politics within WSIX's ownership as the reason. At WSM, he was the final host of the long-running Waking Crew show, a program that featured the last remaining live radio orchestra in the U.S"
No sources for any of this. How do we really know he left because of " politics within WSIX's ownership"? Also there are no sources for "a program that featured the last remaining live radio orchestra in the U.S"
6)"House disliked the culture at KLAC and wanted to be back in Music City with his friends."
This is ridiculous and has no sources.
 
7)"House also has his much-talked-about "palace" in Pegram, Tennessee."
I believe this statement speaks for itself. It is biased and unsourced. Also what determines a home to be a "palace" exactly?--99.177.250.140 (talk) 02:36, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes
Talk:Ikuno-ku, Osaka

message: "Rohto Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. is headquartered in the ward. This area of Osaka is well-known for its yakiniku (Korean-style barbeque) restaurants and the large number of Korean-Japanese citizens living there. "
I deleted the above sentences because it isn't exactly encyclopedic. Osakadan 05:41, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of some facts 

message: The following two sentences were removed because they describe the Zainichi in too much general than appropriate to fit into this small article about a ward of Osaka city.
 While some Koreans freely chose to immigrate to Japan, many were forced to move to Japan when the Japanese occupied Korea. Many were forced to work in factories, in mines and as labourers, often under appalling conditions.http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20000430b2.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mantokun (talk • contribs) 12:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two sentences deleted
Talk:Ambulocetidae

message: The article says that the skeleton found of Ambulocetus was "very complete."  This may be an overstatement.  "Partially complete" would possibly be a better term.  As well, the article says that there is only one other genus in the family, however, Himalayacetus is clearly listed as a species within the family.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.29.88.67 (talk) 22:23, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 18:36, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems with the Article
Talk:Protocetus

message: I don't think the description of this species is accurate, particularly "it still had small hind flippers, and its front flippers had webbed toes... The shape of the bones in the tails suggests that it may have evolved tail flukes, like those of modern whales,"
Given that only the skull and some vertebra of this particular species were discovered, it seems a bit presumptive to speculate on the front or hind flippers or the tail.
If this Protocetidae is similar to the other genus in this family, it was semi-aquatic and would have moved on land with all of its limbs.
I suggest this article be edited to reflect this.
Rooples (talk) 01:46, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Please be aware that our policy on original research requires edits be reliably sourced. If you have a reliable source, please add a citation when you make these changes. CityOfSilver 01:48, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Details of species not supported by linked articles. 
Talk:Harry Miller (auto racing)

message: Didn't Harry miller also build a small number of roadgoing convertibles in the late '40s? Without commercial success AFAIK...  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  16:36, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: IIRC only one was built.  I've seen mention - and photos - in Mark L. Dees' "The Miller Dynasty" (I think).  Enormously long bonnet and front-wheel drive. Mr Larrington (talk) 15:23, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That's more than I know about it. Thx.  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  00:57, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miller time? 

message: Would like to see something added about the Locomobile Junior 8, which was an ohv 199 cid version of his racing engine sold as Locomobile's first straight 8.
(No I won't add it myself. Too many pissing wars). 2601:2C7:4281:C060:6100:C048:844B:3E47 (talk) 15:20, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adaptation of his racing engine to production cars
Talk:Bematist

message: Hello. I just opened this thread. But why does it have no contents box? Gun Powder Ma 05:57, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Contents box

message: Hi, why are the measurements and actual distances given in English miles, instead of kilometres? We could also give them in Roman miles, of course, or Scots miles, or any other outdated measurement system, but it would be more fitting to a 21st-century encyclopaedia to use a modern unit which any educated person in the world knows. Note for the American readers of this talk page: the unit NASA uses, not that unit a contractor for NASA used, causing the loss of a Mars orbiter. Bever (talk) 21:54, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the page is written in English, the analogous English measurements are given. Conversion formulas can easily be found online. Kocinka (talk) 20:04, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Kocinka, since reader's convenience is priority, we have the template to convert obsolete units (feet, inches, whatever, imagine measuring length in body parts in 21st century) to normal international units. 'Cause leaving them as is and forcing 99% of readers to search for conversion formulas is exactly what WP:SYSTEMICBIAS is about. Backward countries are a tiny minority, just look at this map. a!rado🦈 (C✙T) 05:35, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miles
Talk:Timeline of STS-115

message: no expand
Jer10 95 04:27, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article expansion

message: please improve the articleso it could be  on the GA list.
*Jer10 95 04:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: improvement

message: To standardize shuttle missions, see STS-116, STS-117, STS-118) I have merged Timeline of STS-115 into STS-115, and this Timeline page can probably be deleted. I'll tag it and it can be discussed, but it has been orphaned since March 2007, and we're trying to standardize all the mission articles into the same format. See WikiProject Space missions. Ariel♥Gold 00:10, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging
Talk:Panoz

message: I am an OTRS volunteer posting this request in behalf of a company representative who requested changes in OTRS ticket .
Request is as follows:
* Change the third sentence: "Founded in 1989 as Panoz Auto Development by Dan Panoz, son of pharmaceutical and motorsport mogul Don Panoz"
*:to this: "Founded in 1989 as Panoz Auto Development by Dan Panoz and currently owned by pharmaceutical and motorsport mogul Dr. Don Panoz"
* Change the fifth sentence: "Panoz products have included the Panoz Roadster and AIV Roadster, and the Panoz Esperante."
*:to this: "Panoz products have included the Panoz Roadster and AIV Roadster, the Panoz Esperante, and the Panoz Avezzano."
* Remove the 6th sentence: "All Panoz road cars are tested at Panoz-owned Road Atlanta in Braselton, Georgia and built at the Braselton workshop." because the company neither owns nor tests at Road Atlanta anymore; they sold the track to NASCAR. The sentence can be replaced with "All Panoz vehicles are manufactured at the factory in Hoschton, Georgia, located 2 miles from the Braselton office."
* Discard sentence 7: "Electric vehicle company Green4U,..." because Green4U is no longer the parent company.
* Change the products info to "Limited-production luxury sports cars" and please get rid of the parent company info.
The correspondent indicated that more change requests may come in. I have asked him to introduce himself here and continue. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:43, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 28 September 2018 

message: # The entire lead section was insufficiently paraphrased from the source material and was removed/replaced with the proposed text.
# As the replacement text was not linked to any of the sources given in the prior text, these references were removed. The one source maintenance template was placed in the article, taking the place of the more citations needed template. The section templates noting no sources were left untouched. 
# Duplicate Wiki-links, common wiki-links, and those which did not link to the given title were de-linked to clear the sea of blue.Regards,  Spintendo  06:39, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 29-SEP-2018
Talk:Riley Technologies

message: Should Riley & Scott and Riley Technologies be considered the same company? Wasn't the original R&S wound up when Reynard was closed down, and didn't Bob Riley found Riley Tech independently from the previous R&S operation? --Pc13 (talk) 14:19, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The articles are currently a single one because there was little information. If you are able to write a separate Riley & Scott article, feel free to do so by writing it over the redirect and subsequently remove the information on Riley & Scott from this article except mentioning that Riley is the Riley from R&S. -Drdisque (talk) 15:34, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Since nobody objected, I went ahead and forked Riley & Scott into its own article. -Drdisque (talk) 03:53, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Gender pay gap in the United States

message: Greetings! Regarding this revert of this text:
:The federal Equal Pay Act of 1963 made it illegal to pay women less simply based on gender. The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 made all sex discrimination in covered workplaces illegal (with exceptions), and this coverage was expanded to the basis of pregnancy by the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act.
I'm not sure what sources you are requesting. I described this material as "self-documenting" because the body text refers to the documents being summarized, so no footnotes should be needed for verification. It's true that the names of the documents are also internal links, but that's just for readers who want more in-depth information about those documents. -- Beland (talk) 02:06, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello and thank you for collegially taking this to the talk page. I agree with you that this sentence is pretty benign and strikes me as very likely correct. Still I am not seeing these points established in the body of the article and they should be backed up by sources. I have added the sentence back in with a citation needed tag. -Pengortm (talk) 16:53, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations for laws 

message: You cannot take earnings data alone and draw all the conclusions suggested on this page. Are they working exactly the same job with the same level of experience and output, for the same amount of worked time? If there is a difference in any of those things the data here is meaningless. Even among a single gender there will be large differences in pay for the above factors. Statements about these issues with the data need to be voiced as ignorant people will draw false conclusions based on this incomplete argument. 172.56.40.213 (talk) 18:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Data is incomplete to make useful conclusions 

message: — Assignment last updated by PurplePhoneLaptop (talk) 14:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Race in America, sec 1
Talk:John Raymond Broadbent (major general)

message: :John Raymond Broadbent (1914-2006) → John Raymond Broadbent (Major General) - Better disambiguator. Pdfpdf (talk) 03:18, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal 

message: If there are no objections in the next 48 hours, someone will move:
*:John Raymond Broadbent (1914-2006) → John Raymond Broadbent (Major General)
*:John Raymond Broadbent (1893-1972) → John Raymond Broadbent (Brigadier)
--Pdfpdf (talk) 11:21, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid I don't follow your logic. Only one of them was a Major General. Pdfpdf (talk) 15:17, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Support for the younger; Oppose for the elder Yes, fine so Major General can be used, but they were both brigadiers: the elder in 1945 and the younger in 1956–8, so that shouldn't be used. DrKiernan (talk) 15:40, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

text: I'm afraid I don't follow your logic about both Brigadiers; only one of them was a Major General. However, I can see merit in using profession. Pdfpdf (talk) 15:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, how about "Major General" and "Quartermaster"? DrKiernan (talk) 15:36, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Lack of) Action 

message: *:John Raymond Broadbent (1914-2006) → John Raymond Broadbent (Major General)
*:John Raymond Broadbent (1893-1972) → John Raymond Broadbent (Quartermaster)
Pdfpdf (talk) 23:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Another proposal
Template talk:Chola history

message: The crux of the problem seems to be the choice of the words to describe the Cholas of the Sangam period. The two articles in questions Early Cholas and the Legendary Early Chola Kings, both record the names of the names of the earliest Chola kings. Both articles clearly document the fact that "...kings recorded for whom there is no verifiable historic evidence." The second article clearly denotes the names of kings dating back to around 3000 BCE are legendary and apocryphal. This article was created to clearly distinguish what is accepted in the historical and academic circles as to what is myth and what is history. 
The Cholas documened in the Early Cholas article cannot be classifed as 'mythical' because of the fact that the names of the kings found in the Sangam poetry are corroborated in later Chola epigraphy. While this on its own may not be accepted as historical proof, contemporary writing by Greek travellers and Roman merchants corroborate the descriptions of the Chola state found in the Sangam poetry. Asoka's edicts mention Cholas as one of the kingdom lying outside the mauryan empire. Historical method states that literary evidence is an accepted primary source. Moreover, some of the kings mentioned in the Sangam poetry are also found in the earliest epigrpahy found in Tamil Nadu. 
The above reasons are why historians such as Prof. Basham and K.A.N. Sastri treated the early Chola kings such as Karikala Chola, etc as historical figures in their books rather than merely mythical.
;Citations
*Nilakata Sastri and Srinivasachari, Advanced History of India, pp 177
*Nilakanta Sastri, The Colas, pp 30 - 56
*A.L Basham, The wonder that was India, pp228
- Parthi talk/contribs 22:22, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early Cholas or 'Mythical cholas'
Talk:Vision Racing

message: Most of this article appears to be plagiarized from the Rolex Sports Car Series website
--DOHC Holiday (talk) 01:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch, I rewrote it using an older version as a baseline. -Drdisque (talk) 02:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism?
Talk:Fernández Racing

message: Is Fernández Racing considered an American team, or a Mexican team or both, i.e. should it be included in :Category:American auto racing teams and/or :Category:Mexican auto racing teams? DH85868993 11:02, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It has a Mexican owner but its shops are in the United States. I guess you could consider it both. -Drdisque 16:55, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added it into both categories. Thanks. DH85868993 14:05, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality
Talk:Fort Bell Army Airfield

message: This article has been incorrectly named against the Naming Conventions. --JAYMEDINC 17:21, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move

message: ...that Fort Bell was never the name of the Airfield. The first part of the base created was Fort Bell, which housed army engineers and civilian builders who built the airfield. The army kept the title Fort Bell to refer to those areas of the base OTHER than the completed field, which was titled Kindley Field (operational from 1943). Whether Kindley Field was seen as an element of Fort Bell, or...as the largest piece of real estate, and the functional part of the base, once construction was finished, a neighbour is difficult to surmise from the available references. In any case, the title of this article in now blatantly incorrect. It would be better to title it Kindley Field, if only one name must be in the title.
Aodhdubh 01:22, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, it isn't my intention to in-correctly name any articles.  I just want them to meet the Wikipedia Naming Convention guidelines. I have now proposed the split to agree with your last post. --JAYMEDINC 01:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: As author of this article, I must point out

message: ===Support===
If the base changed from Fort Bell, to Kindley Field that is how the two seperate articles need to be named. --JAYMEDINC 01:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split discussion

message: If the base changed from Fort Bell, to Kindley Field that is how the two seperate articles need to be named. --JAYMEDINC 01:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Support

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:39, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Talk:Sanair Super Speedway

message: There should be a circuit diagram, map location in relation to Montreal, and a photo. The flying S logo would be nice also. 70.51.8.110 (talk) 09:43, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Some more track diagrams would be good, for the other track configurations other that the road track currently indicated (like for the ovals) -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 08:41, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: ReqImage

message: Sanair redirect is missing for this article. 70.51.8.110 (talk) 09:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In the future be bold and add it yourself. -Drdisque (talk) 16:22, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sanair 

message: The 1986 Rick Mears lap time is the qualifying time, not the fastest race lap. Fastest race lap data is not available for IndyCar races prior to 1992. --Mark McWire (talk) 01:13, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rick Mears has qualy record but not race lap record
Talk:Quartier Mangin

message: I think the map has the wrong location, I thought the airbase was further northeast than the small map would indicate, worth double checking  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.195.113.2 (talk) 15:38, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Location on map

message: Beautiful article, well-sectioned, lots of pictures. I wonder if the intro can't be cleaned up and expanded somewhat. LordAmeth 09:09, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MILHIST Assessment

message: :The facility was first established in the late 1930s as a French Air Force grass airdrome named "Laon-Chambry"
Isn't Laon-Chambry the grass airfield at 49.595 N, 3.630 E, which is just another airfield? --Antheii (talk) 16:10, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laon-Couvron versus Laon-Chambry 
Talk:Resinol

message: This article is about a proprietary product. I think that the medical type info should be added to the pages on resocinol, petrolatum, and barrier creams/ointments. The brand name Resinol might be mentioned somewhere on these, but if the product is notable in itself, under its own name, then that should be established. Any thoughts? ben 06:34, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move info from this page
Talk:Victorian Legislative Council

message: The article Provinces of the Victorian Legislative Council refers to subdivisions that will soon cease to exist, limiting what can be said about them.
AGREE or however you vote in favour. --Crazycrazyduck 07:13, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: It seems a bit ridiculous that we have maps for the LC provinces/districts that existed in the 19th century, but not the regions of today.Colonial Overlord (talk) 01:42, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we get a map of the modern regions? 

message: I would dispute including the 'Current Distribution of Seats' heading for the section on Councillors elected at the last election.  They won't take their seats for some time.
Also, how come Labor and Liberal, on 13 and 15 seats respectively, are both on 35% of the council?  Surely this should be 32.5% and 37.5% respectively.Felix Dance (talk) 02:11, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Councillors will take their seats in a matter of days. The Labor and Liberal seat numbers were incorrect and have now been corrected. Colonial Overlord (talk) 03:35, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impetuous Inclusion of newly elected councillors 

message: I used an image (the original LC boundaries) from this page on the page for Parliament of Victoria. I forgot to cite this in the original edit summary. Thanks so much to whoever made it, it's fantastic! :) Vision Insider (talk) 22:56, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Forgotten citation
Talk:Brigade (disambiguation)

message: These may belong on a list in international brigade, or something...:
Non-traditional military units:
*Jewish Brigade (British Army)
*Lafayette Escadrille (French Air Service)
*International Brigades (Spanish Republic)
*Abraham Lincoln Brigade (Spanish Republic)
*Black Brigades (Italian Fascist)
*Brigade 2506 (American CIA)
*Red Brigades (Italian revolutionaries)
*055 Brigade (Al Quaida)
Civilian international organizations:
* Venceremos Brigade (Cuba)
* Boys' Brigade
--Jerzy•t 06:45, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Simple Mail Access Protocol

message: What's the point of the protocol? All the mentioned advantages are either available in IMAP directly or through extensions (Namely: BINARY - transfer decoded attachments, URLAUTH+CATENATE+BURL - part of the Lemonade initative, mail is transferred only once). --82.208.37.229 06:51, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: SMAP aims to provide those features without needing extensions, while staying simpler than IMAP.  --Piet Delport 22:17, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

message: "As of 2005" - what is the latest on this protocol after 14 years? --91.135.7.169 (talk) 09:50, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status since 2005