lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lochner era

message: I removed an "unreferenced" tag from this article.  While more references can surely be found for this subject, and a much broader article written, the article cites references in text: specifically, several US Supreme Court decisions, each of which has its own article with full citations available.  The tag does not belong because the references are incorporated into the text. - Smerdis of Tlön 13:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed unreferenced tag: unwarranted

message: Added a reference to the West Coast Hotel v. Parrish dissent at the end of the libertarian-view paragraph as requested in an HTML  comment in the article text. Removed comment from article text.  Doonhamer | Banter  05:33, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference to West Coast Hotel v. Parrish dissent

message: I think someone needs to add a whole section to this thing.  A good bridge to what I think should be added is someone's question, "why should it be noted that those last two cases were decided during this era."
There needs to be a section disscussing the era's relationship with substantive due process.  Lochner, and the era, basically depend on substantive due process, but that isn't in here.  So, we need those last two cases to discuss this important issue and fill a giant hole in the article.  Anyone willing to do the work? Piratejosh85 (talk) 05:07, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Hole!
Talk:Electoral district of Condoublin

message: The district was officially spelt with a u, Condoublin, from 1894  to 1901  and this is the spelling used in the NSW election database. Confusingly the parliament members list uses the modern spelling of Condobolin -  & . Find bruce (talk) 01:38, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Talk:Bazooka (chewing gum)

message: Miss Bazooka (Virginia Owens) appeared November 16, 1949 (Wednesday) as a You Bet Your Life contestant. .... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 16:12, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: you_bet_your_life_1949-11-16_secret_word_grass
Talk:Fairy chess

message: Disagree with merge --Java7837 05:32, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, may be we can have a separate article for this, since it is a genre of chess problems. But how to prevent duplication of this article content and chess variants article? Andreas Kaufmann 20:47, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

message: FIDE album is relevant, why removing? --AndrejJ (talk) 05:33, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That passage seems to be about how FIDE Albums are organized. Is it just there to say that there are fairy chess problems in official FIDE publications? If so, it should say that, because as it is currently written it seems tangential, and is kind of incoherent (it doesn't even contain real sentences). — Gwalla | Talk 00:39, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  FIDE album
Talk:Thelma Bates (character)

message: Lesbian sex edit
Cassie and Thelma don't have sex in the dream they makeout and cassie wakes up. 
After this, Cassie tells Thelma to stay out of her dreams, and theres no evidence given to imply that Thelma disobeys this. 
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.238.237.233 (talk) 22:19, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Australian Touring Car Racing

message: see discussion at the V8 supercars talk page. - Ctbolt 05:43, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What years did each series run from and to? 

message: I'd like to know why this template is placed on articles about Bathurst 1000 races (prior to 2007), as the links in this template do not go directly to any other Bathurst 1000 article. I feel that there should be a new subheading in this template called Bathurst 500/1000 with links to the appropiate articles. - Kytabu (talk) 00:38, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Withdrawing it from the Bathurst 1000 race articles is justifiable, and certainly should be done pre-1973 when the regulations differed. However I'm personally against adding Bathurst to the template is the template will quickly get oversized and cluttered. Certainly don't think anything beyond main game touring car and V8 Supercar summaries should be listed. Because where then does Super Touring go, AMSCAR, Sun-7 series, Toby Lee series, etc --Falcadore (talk) 10:24, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bathurst 1000 

message: Should a section be added to this template that includes the years of the Development Series?? - Kytabu (talk) 06:29, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No. The pages from 1999 onwards are titled V8 Supercar season, so they should be incorporated more into that. By way of example, have a look at 1995 Australian Touring Car season. The issue has been broached previously here and here but did not gain any further comment. Perhaps it would be best to review those discussions as it covers this issue. --Falcadore (talk) 10:13, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development Series
Talk:Nagasaki Electric Tramway

message: Just a couple questions: It says there are officially 4 lines, but 5 are listed. Also, why are there parentheses around certain stops (such as Dejima)? BilabialBoxing 05:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lines 

message: What is the track gauge? Peter Horn User talk 04:02, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track gauge
Talk:Hathazari Upazila

message: Ghh Md Khorshedul Alam (talk) 10:26, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garduara
Talk:Stephen Chan Chi-wan

message: Can't help thinking that the ICAC probe section would be a better fit at wikinews than here. I'm tying myself up in knots over tenses, the present tense fits best with a current and changing event, but doesn't sit well with an encyclopedic article.KTo288 (talk) 21:41, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to wikinews?

message: This was originally in the Stephen Chan article until it was put into a new article.  It could be expanded into much bigger size.  It should not be merged.  Whether anyone will expand it in the near future, maybe not. Benjwong (talk) 07:42, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it could be expanded.  But this article may be one of those articles that forever sits in a "could be expanded" state, while being a relatively small size.  The article hasn't expanded since March, and the Chinese version of the article is not much bigger.  I am leaning toward merging.  Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 13:32, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

text: ... weak support on the merge due to WP:BIO1E. Tvtr (tlk–cntrbtn) 16:30, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Object against merge. Stephen Chan has already become notable for his talk-show before the corruption investigation. Although media coverage of the corruption investigation centred around Stephen Chan, he is but one of the many TVB officials involved in the scandal. Stephen Chan got much more media coverage only because of his prior notability, which ironically made Wikipedia editors think Stephen Chan was notable only for the scandal, and the scandal was notable only because of Stephen Chan. --Deryck C. 01:51, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There is enough materials for a long article. For that reason it should not be merged. What is difficult is that the ICAC never fully came out with a final statement.  Once the investigation went private, everything became unknown. Benjwong (talk) 02:42, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Should not merge
Talk:Lohagara Upazila, Chittagong

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Lohagara_Upazila_(Chittagong_District). Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Rubbish computer (talk) 21:24, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: In Baker Ali Para have a Fazil Madrasa,A Primary School ,A Post Office And A Community Clinic.People of this village mostly Educated.Woman Councilor  of 7,8 and 9 ward named Jesmin Akter lives in Baker Ali Para and she is An Ideal model of Women leadership in Lohagara.Great Shufi Shah Abdul Khalek was born here. Shaiful Islam (talk) 19:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baker Ali Para,South Sukchari ,Lohagara,Chittagong 
Talk:Mirsharai Upazila

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Mirsharai_Upazila. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:08, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Saraighat

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Oppose. This is not a problem. The article can be expanded to cover other aspects of the area. Dekimasuよ! 04:12, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Raozan Upazila

message: Sarkar para, Huzur er Bari. Raozan Chittagong Ths Munna (talk) 13:16, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maolana Mohamad Abdus Sabur. X principal Mohammadia Adarsha Madrasa,Muniria Madrasa. (1945-2010) 

message: An old neutrality tag that appears to have no active discussion has been removed from this page per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever any one of the following is true:
:::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
:::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
:::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant
The article has been edited extensively in the three years since the tag was added, at this time there is no obvious overarching NPOV problem, and no evidence of ongoing discussion of neutrality, so I've removed the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! --Worldbruce (talk) 04:45, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed stale POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
Talk:Sandwip Upazila

message: Sandwip is an Upazilla of bangladesh. I am suggesting to keep the article Sandwip Upazila as main and Sandwip a Redirect.
রাহাত | ✉  06:42, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is the usual procedure to have separate pages about each geographic feature and each political division, so there would be one page for the island, and one for the upazila that includes more than this one island. I've posted a notice at Wikipedia talk:Notice board for Bangladesh-related topics#Merger proposal for Sandwip Upazila with Sandwip to see what members of wikiproject:Bangladesh think about this matter. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 14:21, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

text: Please see the map in Banglapedia here, which shows two islands in Sandwip Upazila. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 12:44, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

text: I don't know, I'm just going by that map. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 12:39, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicate
Talk:Rang Ghar

message: The meaning of Rangghar is not Red House but Recreation/Entertainment House. The word ৰং in Assamese means leisure/recreation etc. As the Rangghar was used as a pavilion to watch various entertainment activities, so is the name
Priyankoo (talk) 23:52, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of Rangghar
Talk:Satkania Upazila

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* Write here
123.49.63.34 (talk) 03:58, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't say what you think the problem is. Judging by this map, the coordinates currently in the article indicate a spot that is roughly in the center of the upazila, and the view one gets from the Google and Bing maps is wide enough to show the whole of the upazila. Where's the error? Deor (talk) 15:43, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Satkania_Upazila. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Rubbish computer (talk) 21:21, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Barura Upazila

message: Barura Upazila is very nice and very well upazila in Comilla district. All information collection was unknown our skill so when open this web side i am learning hold upazila so it's major benefit for us.Specially thanks all collector.  i suggestion to all collector actually all information some clearly read  form web side so very fine.(saiful islam)
thanks all of you  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.191.127.4 (talk) 04:55, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from:  http://www.banglapedia.org/HT/B_0328.HTM. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sminthopsis84 (talk) 21:29, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:20 to 1: Aussie Parties and Pastimes

message: Why does this have an article? Does this mean I can also create an article about episode 468 of Prisoner (TV series)? Format 03:06, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why does this have an article?

message: The individual episode articles for 20 to 1 are now being reviewed according to episode notability guidelines.  Please contribute to the discussion on Talk:20 to 1#Episode review. Thanks. -- Ned Scott 04:33, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  episode article review notice
Talk:Mannose receptor

message: I am a final year undergraduate biochemistry student and I intend to edit this page as part of my coursework for a Science Communication module I am undertaking. 
Abro2701 (talk) 15:35, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Identical with MRC2, see various databases linked. הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) 16:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[UPARAP]] 
Talk:USS Colorado (BB-45)

message: I found a website dedicated to this ship.
http://www.usscolorado.org/History/history.htm
Might it be of any use to the article?
96.243.206.236 (talk) 04:21, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Website

message: Friedman, on p 368 of US Battleships says the 5in/25 were not replaced by 5in/38 but only shielded.  The photographs on that page seem to bear this out.
Anyone have a definitive answer?
Subspace1250 (talk) 06:49, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 5 inch guns

message: Early WWII chronology appears garbled. 71.83.153.74 (talk) 20:45, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, yes specifically "The work was completed by 31 March 1942..." sentence appearing after "On 31 May, she and Maryland patrolled near Golden Gate Bridge to protect San Francisco from any Japanese attack...". I attempted to fix this while copyediting this article previously, but it was changed back with this edit: . I am not certain why it was reverted, but will not make the change again as I potentially got it wrong. I will ping the GA nominator.  G'day, are you able to address this issue? Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 01:16, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Chronology

message: The Wikipedia entry says the grounding was on the Diamond Shoals of North Carolina, with references to articles in the Times (London).  I’m not able to check those Times articles to confirm they say the North Carolina location.  However, several American newspapers (New York Times, Washington Evening Star, New Britain [Connecticut] Herald) all cite, at the time and with photos, the ship grounded in New York harbor, on the Diamond Reef near Governors Island.  This was an important event for the USS Colorado, so it deserves a close look to have the correct entry. WanderingGator (talk) 02:30, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Pinging , who added the lines a while back. Can you double check what The Times articles say? I'd guess they mistook the Diamond Reef for Diamond Shoals. Parsecboy (talk) 12:45, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grounding in 1927
Talk:Provolone

message: The term Provolone (meaning large Provola) hi appeared around the end of the 20th Century
</blockquote>
Shouldn't that be 19th century?
* Aye, it should. Have edited it accordingly. 83.217.175.193 12:20, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I wondered if american provolone was produced differently than the traditional stuff.  In America, there certainly are many companies that produce it, with wildly varying quality.  Just wondering why.72.78.154.193 (talk) 05:45, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Provolone 

message: "non original" was removed from the North American variant statement.  According to Wiktionary, a definition of variant is "Something that is slightly different from a type or norm."  There are likely only two reasons to add the "non original" adjective:
*as a derogatory term to belittle this variant
*as redundant describer indicating the variant isn't the same as the type or norm
In either case, it's not needed.ndyguy (talk) 01:37, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.181.235.120 (talk) 22:47, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

text: Is there any reason to leave those words in?  I'm not familiar with Italian provolone so I don't know if the comment is justified or not, but if not, it should be removed.JDZeff (talk) 03:42, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non original variant 

message: I always pronounce the final 'e.' Evidently, SubWay trains all their employees to pronounce it as a rhyme to "roam alone."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.172.110.244 (talk) 08:56, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation? 

message: Need more details on what lipase products, e.g. which fatty acids, give the distinctive provolone flavor in comparison to milder or different tasting sharp cheeses like cheddar. CharlesHBennett (talk) 23:40, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lipase and flavor 

message: I realised a not insignificant problem: in this encyclopaedia there is the wikilink "provolone" on many words "provola", but these are two different cheeses, although similar: https://it.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provolone; https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provola. JacktheBrown (talk) 21:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The most "straightforward" solution would be to change the current redirect of "provola" to "provolone" into its own bona fide article.  The alternative is to change the pages linking to "provola" to link to  which displays like this:  (i.e. clicking on the "it" link displays the "provola" article from the Italian wikipedia.  There are only about a half-dozen pages that actually reference "provola" cheese rather than some particular type of cheese that has "provola" in the name. Fabrickator (talk) 23:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[Provolone]]" and "[[provola (cheese)|provola]]"