lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Heinrich Caro

message: Caro is a Jewish name. Rabbi Joseph Caro (or Karo) is the Rabbi who 400 years ago wrote the "Set Table", the book of Jewish rules, followed by all orthodox Jews. Heinrich was born in Poznan, where there was a large Jewish community. He started his career working with Jaques Meyer father of Viktor Meyer. 
He then worked with Karl Lieberman and Carl Graebe.
Carl Graebe (here in English Wikipedia for some reason listed as Grabe with an umlaute on it, while in the German wikipedia he is listed with English letters) himself seems to be of Jewish descent. His father was trade minister of Frankfurt, and he studied at the what seems to have been a Jewish school - Abel and Simon's school.
Working on Indigo and discovering the process of creating blue, red and purple dies was a Jewish quest. See Techelet and especially the discussion on Yigael Yadin's findings at Massada (actually found in the Bar Kochba caves in the Judean desert).
פשוט pashute ♫ (talk) 08:59, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish? 
Talk:Joint Institute for Nuclear Research

message: The following coordinate fixes are need for JINR. 
The current coordinates point to an apartment complex  two blocks from JINR. Since JINR is not conspicuous in satellite images, that's enough to throw off a user. Here are better coordinates: 
Lat 56.7465 Lon 37.1893
Lat 56 deg 44'46 Lon 37deg11'21
—Pulu (talk) 00:34, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 21:01, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error and fix suggestion 

message: Shouldn't this article talk about Flerov, whom some authors describe as the founder of the lab and its most important researcher?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.55.231.76 (talk) 17:52, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Georgy Flerov 
Talk:Heinrich Czolbe

message: Parts of this article appear to be plagarized without attribution from Nadeem Hussain's essay "Nietzsche's Positivism," European Journal of Philosophy 12:3 (2004): 326–368.
For example, from the Wikipedia entry: 
And from Hussain's essay:
--128.220.159.6 (talk) 18:46, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagarism 

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Helge S. Kragh (2013). Entropic Creation: Religious Contexts of Thermodynamics and Cosmology. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, page 120, and http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/friedrich-lange/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:50, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: And, based on the comment higher up this page, also from "Nietzsche's Positivism," European Journal of Philosophy 12:3 (2004): 326–368. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:50, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Kerma (physics)

message: To explain a chage i have made...Note that the only difference between gamma rays and x-rays is their source. Gamma rays are produced in the nucleus of atoms, and x-rays are produced outside. X-rays are commonly described as having lower energies (higher wavelength) than gamma rays on the electromagnetic spectrums charts, but x-rays can be produced with higher energies (shorter wavelength) than gamma rays. For example, in radiotherapy, a Cobalt-60 teletherapy machine produces gamma rays (photons originating from the nucleus) at 1.17 and 1.33 MeV (MeV=mega electron Volts, which is a unit of energy). However, a modern linear acceleratorg can produce x-rays at much higher energies, eg. 18 MeV. The photons produced are x-rays, because they are produced outside the nucleus, by bremsstrahlung radiation. A lot of people have the misconception (probably tought in secondary school physics) that there is a particular energy above which photons (or electromagnetic radiation) is a gamma ray, and below they are x-rays.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drchessman (talk • contribs) 01:40, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Large Helical Device

message: Wow, this is impressive upon cursory research. (Today's issue of the journal Nature said "a Japanese stellarator known as the Large Helical Device, in Toki City, has held its plasma for more than an hour.") We need more information on the advantage of this compared with the Joint European Torus etc. – Kaihsu 11:31, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: An abstract with data here - Rod57 (talk) 16:27, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Impressed
Talk:Heinrich Georg Stahmer

message: As the first para says he was (1892-1978) I will alter his birth year from 1894! Hugo999 (talk) 07:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Best of the Best 4: Without Warning

message: Please feel free to expand the article if you find any new information, such as the date of the movie. Thanks in advance. Kiwi8 14:20, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Date added October 20th, 1998 found in release dates section on IMDB. --Chad 10:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date
Talk:United States lightship Portsmouth (LV-101)

message: I am proposing to standardize US lightship and lightship station article names. I welcome contributions to the discussion here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ships#Lightship_naming_revised_proposal. 
* Under this proposal, this article would be renamed United States lightship Portsmouth (LV-101), with redirects:
** United States lightship LV-101
** United States lightship WAL-524
** United States lightship Charles (LV-101)
** United States lightship Relief (LV-101)
** United States lightship Overfalls (LV-101)
** United States lightship Overfalls (WAL-524)
** United States lightship Stonehorse Shoal (WAL-524)
** And the above, without "United States"
*The naming is still highly misleading to readers unfamiliar with light vessels and light stations. The vessel is never named the station name. The big letters only denote the station, not the vessel. The issue should be examined across the light vessel articles and corrected where necessary to prevent the misconception from getting into sources relying on Wikipedia. Palmeira (talk) 00:39, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed rename
Talk:Nepenthes × sarawakiensis

message: Yes, the stresses are perfectly placed for the variations; the former being the Bahasa intonation, the latter the English assumed pronunciation - thank you!  I question the change of /ɪ/ to /ɨ/ as the difference is merely a question of height versus centrality across the Atlantic.  Please elaborate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Attenboroughii (talk • contribs) 08:19, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sarawakiensis IPA 
Talk:Chinese Rocks

message: The first recorded and correct title for the song is "Chinese Rocks", Dee Dee even refered to it as Chinese Rocks... not sure why the Ramones dropped the s when they recorded it. - Deathrocker 14:32, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: What version does he sing "Hey Dee Dee, do you want to go suck some cock?". I have almost every version of this song and cant locate that lyric?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peeky (talk • contribs) 17:34, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was part of a performance on the Hey, is Dee Dee home, documentary by Lech Kowalski, although just as an alternative line. 惑乱 分からん * \)/ (\ (< \) (2 /) /)/ * (talk) 13:28, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other usage 

message: There was an error in the article where it said the Dee Dee had said he started writing "Chinese Rocks" because Johnny Thunders was going to try to write a song better than Lou Reed's "Heroin." The person Dee Dee said was going to write the song better than "Heroin" was RICHARD HELL, not Thunders, so I changed it. There's a footnote in the article that gives the correct reference from the book "Please Kill Me"--but in the book ("Please Kill Me"), on the page listed, it's Hell, not Thunders, Dee Dee is quoted as saying is trying to surpass "Heroin." Roosterer (talk) 13:13, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  altered quote from Thunders to Hell 
Talk:Neutron emission

message: The article has got a nice looking table of isotopes, but it is not very informative and fairly confusing. Some isotopes have got different colour for some reason and there is an upper dashed line? Is there any figure text or link to the original? Yikkayaya (talk) 16:24, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The grey colour indicates stable isotopes. The other coloured squares are various relatively long lived isotopes. Isotopes above and to the right of the upper dashed line decay by proton emission. Most of the unstable isotopes between the two dashed lines decay by beta-minus or beta-plus decay; Be-8 decays to He-4+He-4, and is classified as an alpha-emitter. Lavateraguy (talk) 17:36, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not very informative table 

message: The lede and following table covers spontaneous neutron emission the ground states of proton-deficient nuclei. The article then wonders off into the weeds of neutron emission from excited states of other nuclei (more or less on topic) and neutron production in spontaneous and induced fission (not on topic), though a sentence and link at the end of the lede wouldn't go amiss. Lavateraguy (talk) 17:07, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused subject
Talk:Heinrich Hoffmann (author)

message: Hoffmann was born in Frankfurt to an architect father, Philipp Hoffmann, who was responsible for the city's streets and waterways. Hoffmann's mother died when he was a baby. His father later married her sister, Antoinette Lausberg, who was a loving and more than adequate mother to him. Lazy and easily distracted, Hoffmann at first struggled at school, but became a successful student after conforming to the strict discipline imposed by his demanding father. At university in Heidelberg, he immersed himself into the corps student culture aptly portrayed by Mark Twain (in his ??). His zest for dueling was small, but owing to his sociability, good humour and wit, Hoffmann soon became the center of many social circles, a pattern that would later repeat itself in his hometown. His progress in his medical studies was slow because of the many distractions. To flee these he left Heidelberg for Halle, where he concentrated on his studies under Professor Peter Krukenberg, the founder of a charity clinic. His first brush with medical practice coincided with a cholera outbreak in Halle. After getting his medical degree, he intended to spend a year in Paris (funded by the Frankfurt Bethmann bank) to improve his knowledge of surgery. But due to the deteriorating health of his father, he had to return home early.
Hezarfen67 (talk) 21:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early life and education

message: This section describes Philipp as Heinrich's father, despite the former being only three years older than the latter. Could anyone please tell me what to do here? Thylacine24 (talk) 02:28, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philipp Hoffmann couldn't have been Heinrich's father
Talk:Hadith of prohibition of Mut'ah at Khaybar

message: http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/086.sbt.html#009.086.091 --Striver 14:46, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Maybe they should just all be knocked out and have a reference to the original.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.191.169.117 (talk) 20:04, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotations 

message: Half these hadiths talk about donkeys. Not mutah marriage. why?Zaza8675 (talk) 16:54, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: donkey or muta?
Talk:Culture Shock (Sam & Max)

message: Is that really a screenshot from the game? Looks like to me that it's a capture from the teaser trailer instead... Anyone lucky enough to GameTap it willing to update it? // Gargaj 14:47, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  screenshot 

message: Shouldn't this article be called Sam & Max Episode 1: Culture Shock? I'm pretty sure that that's the correct name of the game. -- Kicking222 15:48, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: This has no info outside a long, unsourced plot synopsis that isn't found in the main article, Sam & Max (computer game).  SHould they be merged?  Milto LOL pia 11:18, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, easily.  (though correct page is Sam & Max Season 1 to avoid redirect).  Same with subsequent episodes --Masem 14:35, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, definently not. see my reasoning on the "Abe Lincoln Must Die" discussion page. - Count23 23:13, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: There is one trivia I know about this game that is about a small reference to Sam & Max Hit the Road when sam - talking to bosco about buying an item - says: "Do you have any vegetables in shape of a famous naturalist?" (It references an inventory item in Sam & Max Hit the Road).I was just wondering, should I add it to this page or to the setting part of this page?           N.samimi island (talk) 20:42, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia
Talk:Georges Painvin

message: There is a picture of this person on the French Wikipedia, but I can't add it to this article because the copyright tag doesn't give enough information. Hut 8.5 14:49, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the assertion on fr: that their photograph is in the public domain may be incorrect, I don't know. There's a photograph supplied by Painvin in David Kahn's Codebreakers which dates from 1914; it's reasonable to suppose that the photo on fr: dates from the same period (possibly even the same series of photos). If we don't know the author or publishing date, then "in all other cases (anonymous works, works made for hire, unknown author or death date unknown), the work is considered copyright protected until 120 years after its creation" Wikipedia:Public domain. — Matt Crypto 16:40, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Simon Singh in The Code Book gives the credit for that picture as "David Kahn Collection", which makes me think it may be copyrighted. I expect we'll have to wait until 2034 then! Hut 8.5 19:10, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  We could reasonably use a fair use rationale; no alternative exists or could be created that is free. — Matt Crypto 21:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. I've uploaded the one that you suggested. Hut 8.5 18:55, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Heinrich Porges

message: Porges was the illegitimate son of Franz Liszt, a fact widely known during his lifetime (but never publicly acknowledged). Photographs of Porges' daughter, the playwright Elsa Bernstein, were staged specifically to showcase her unmistakeably Lisztean nose and profile; there was scarcely a musician in Theresienstadt who didn't know that Liszt's blind granddaughter was locked up with them, confined to the camp's "House For Notables." So why is this no longer general knowledge, here or elsewhere on the web? I know there's historical documentation of the "paternity rumor", so why aren't online biographers clued in? Sandover (talk) 14:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Making a Liszt (and "Czeching it" twice...)
Talk:PLUTO reactor

message: Does anyone know the details of the leak from Harwell? it happened in the late 50s I think. I vaguely  remember that all the farm-milk in the area had to be dumped for some time, because of  radioactive Ceaseum contamination. I was only about 6 or 7 at the time, so details are hazy.--dick (talk) 12:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Williams FW18

message: How many were built and where are they all now?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.176.105.148 (talk) 14:58, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This webpage states that 6 were built and lists the current location of 3 of the cars. DH85868993 (talk) 11:00, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Small Tight Aspect Ratio Tokamak

message: Need explanation or link here ? - Rod57 (talk) 16:55, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  MAST says START used merge compression - but not explained here
Talk:T-15 (reactor)

message: 'Reactor' is far too vague. - Rod57 (talk) 19:33, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Fusion reactor. Still a reactor, in fact a prototype-research one, in nuclear context. T-15 (fusion reactor). 17387349L8764 (talk) 08:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could move to [[T-15 (tokamak)]] 

message: "Effects of the Chernobyl Nuclear Accident on Utility Share Prices. Rajiv Kalra, Glenn V. Henderson, Jr. and Gary A. Raines. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, Vol. 32, No. 2 (Spring, 1993), pp. 52–77."
I do not see how this belongs here and adds to T-15. The article paragraph "This combined with the USSR's desire for cheaper energy ensured the continuing progress of the T-15 under Mikhail S. Gorbachev. It was designed to replace the country's use of gas and coal as the primary sources of energy." is uncited and not part of this research paper, which talks about something completely different. Example from abstract "This study measures stock market reaction to Chernobyl using the event parameter approach, which uses dummy variables. Results indicate negative price reactions to the accident"
Second, the paper does not reference anything in the article, but just as 'further reading'. Hence will be deleted, if no adequate rational is given. KR 17387349L8764 (talk) 08:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effects of the Chernobyl Nuclear Accident on Utility Share Prices
Talk:Carrier Air Wing (video game)

message: This article could use some more information. For instance, there are cut songs from the soundtrack that implies that there were going to be other stages that never made it into the game. More information about the development of the game would be great.
CognitiveBehavioralTherapyWizardTheIX (talk) 02:41, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: This Article Could Use Some More Information
Talk:Technetium-99m generator

message: "is reasonably done every 6 hours or, at most, twice daily" Seeing as there are four 6-hour periods in a day, this seems to be a rather non-sensical statement. --Belg4mit 04:35, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not if you're a nuclear medicine person who only works banker's hours! There aren't too many emergency nuclear medical scans. Thus, the generators get milked at most twice in a daytime hour work day. SBHarris 22:02, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Milking 

message: Would it be possible to have a diagram of the function of the generator? 120.146.157.227 (talk) 02:56, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram 

message: Yeah but how does it work?? What is it; a box of material?
Write something like: "It is a kit for separating the Tc from the Mo by elution." Be terse.
2600:1700:4CA1:3C80:857A:BCFD:8971:6F26 (talk) 15:35, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does it work? 

message: What is done with the Technetium-99 waste? If it is excreted by patients is it simply released into the environment as sufficiently diluted to be of no concern? Are there other forms in which this waste can collect or release into the environment? Hobbitschuster (talk) 17:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waste
Talk:Thermal-neutron reactor

message: There is something missing in wikipedia: The definition of a (neutron) spectrum. Typically when people outside of wikipedia talk about fast vs. slow with regards to reactors, they use the terms "fast spectrum" and "thermal spectrum". However, wikipedia avoids using the term "spectrum". Now there might be valid reasons that the term "spectrum" should not be used in scientific literature, however when I try to look up terms from the "real" world it would be helpful to find an explanation here. 
If there is somebody here who could define "fast spectrum", "thermal spectrum" or "(neutron) spectrum", this would be greatly appreciated – I am not qualified to do that, I fear. Tony Mach (talk) 09:50, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's a spectrum? 
Talk:Dharti Pakar

message: What are people's take on this?Bakaman Bakatalk 15:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing to merge here. Either just redirect or create a disambig page including another link for the Sahara TV show and yet another for the generic term that has evolved out of it -- Lost(talk) 17:38, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Set the Booty Up Right

message: 'Nuff Said. Please list the label in the infobox.--Leahtwosaints (talk) 01:27, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Need to list the label please

message: Hi! I recommend to rename the title of this page since the EP is named Bonin' in the Boneyard - Set the Booty Up Right. The cover has both titles, on the side of the CD it only has "Fishbone  bonin' in the boneyard" written out. Zoli79 (talk) 14:13, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:HMS Foudroyant (1798)

message: This text appears to have Kendall taking over before Puget officially left the ship. It's possible the paperwork was messed up at the Admiralty, but this seems odd. rewinn 02:07, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ?Puget/Kendall Dates?

message: Article states "This Foudroyant remained in service until 1991, when she was taken to Hartlepool and renamed back to Trincomalee."
Really, thats a long time to remain in service. I dont recall any saling vessels in the Falklands or Gulf War. Perhaps the date is wrong?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.4.26.202 (talk) 21:22, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The date is quite correct, see  for further details, and  for her history from 1987 to the present. Of course as a sailing frigate, like HMS Victory, she was not used in front line service. Benea (talk) 23:33, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 1991?
Talk:Abraham–Lorentz–Dirac force

message: This page fails to define the symbols used in its equations, and fails to provide any indication of the implications or value of the formulas. Brews ohare (talk) 20:46, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  I was trying to learn more about this force, but this page only confused me.  There are many other science articles that have this problem.  I don't know enough about the subjects to fix them, but I hope someone does before everyone gets a headache from trying to understand gibberish.  Lets have some real world implications and some better explanation of crazy equations on here! Testmasterflex (talk) 01:19, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notation

message: It should be made clear that the "non-relativistic form" etc. don't describe the ALD force but rather Larmor's formula.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.139.44.222 (talk) 13:22, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Larmor formula 

message: It seems, that signature (+, −, −, −) is used in the formula for the force. Since on both special relativity and Minkowski space pages use signature (−, +, +, +), this can be confusing. Therefore I'm changing the formula to be agreeable with (−, +, +, +) and adding the comment about the signature used. Corrections are welcome. Vikasatkin (talk) 21:36, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signature