Talk:None of the above

message: Articles about elections in Brazil around Wikipedia all clearly state that Brazil has NOTA options in elections.--86.129.139.149 (talk) 00:18, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Brazil

message: I think, "None of the Above" is used in Presidential Elections in Russia. 80.185.152.212 16:31, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 2005 - 2007 Topics

message: Adding a reference to this book would help those researching the subject. I just finished reading it, and it's very relevant. Shazazzily (talk) 00:44, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book entitled, "None of the Above" by Sy Leon 

message: AGAINST. This topic is an inherent part of NOTA, and without it the NOTA article would be incomplete. Neuralwarp (talk) 14:20, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to split off the RON topic 

message: I used to be an election official, and races for which a voter did not cast a vote were counted as "undervotes." While they did not affect the outcome of the election, they did scare unopposed incumbents and encouraged potential challengers to run against them in the next election. The only problem was races in which you got to vote for more than one candidate (because more than one were elected at once). If you voted for any number less than the maximum, it also got called an undervote. Bostoner (talk) 04:08, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference from Abstention 

message: * see entries of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:East_German_elections
* see entries of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_Germany#Elections_in_Nazi_Germany_.28formally_under_the_Weimar_Constitution.29
*According to the tabulary of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belarusian_presidential_election,_2010#Election , it seems in 2010 there was an "against all" option (like in Russia, Ukraine, etc.), but I don't know when it was introduced, if it's still actual, and if it is only at presidential elections or more general also at e.g. parliamentary elections, etc. 62.143.229.223 (talk) 16:47, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nazi Germany (One-party-system parliamentary [[show election]]s), East Germany (One-party-system parliamentary [[show election]]s), Belarus (presidential election)

message: The article is too disjointed.  I think it would benefit from a broader history section that would give a general overview and then there should be subsections about the procedures in different countries and entities.  Those subsections should be short and simple summaries with links to main articles with more detail.  There is simply to great a diversity of election systems to lump "none of the above" into one article, and because of this diversity there is little that is shared from the various systems.  For instance, how is the Polish experience related to Nevada's?  This should be a general, broad, brief introduction to the idea that then points readers onto other more detailed and in-depth articles that are country- or institution-specific.  For instance 're-open nominations" can get a paragraph or 3 here but more a more in-depth treatment elsewhere.  Same with undervote. --Bruce Hall (talk) 06:02, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  An overview section is needed for context, then links to other articles 

message: The following article suggests Mexico also allows subitting back ballots:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/06/11/a-dead-man-wins-election-in-cartel-country.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.129.243.31 (talk) 01:51, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mexico? 

message: The United States section needs a bit of work.  Cleaned up what I could.  Several of the links were bad, or simply looked made up.  Replaced with most proper references I could find.
However, I could not find an authoritative reference to the Isla Vista section.  It was cited with three false links.  SteveJEsposito (talk) 22:39, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  United States 

message: Like the title says.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.251.75.106 (talk) 04:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about 'no award' like the Hugo Awards 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on None of the above. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20151125044018/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/10/none-of-the-above-ballot_n_3576469.html to http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/10/none-of-the-above-ballot_n_3576469.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov/ballot-measures/pdf/initiatives-by-title-and-summary-year.pdf
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080119080414/http://www.commondreams.org:80/news2000/0426-09.htm to http://www.commondreams.org/news2000/0426-09.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:53, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The activities and media coverage of this party are limited to the 2015 General Election. The material would be better consolidated here with other NOTA efforts rather than as a separate page relying mainly on the party's own website. I found some more coverage, but not enough to suggest ongoing independent notability:  Fences&Windows 18:29, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I would also say it is more than a question of just coverage, more so of votes.  I would therefore also support your proposal.- Adam37 Talk 19:29, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

text: Malmanstan, the party now being moribund us relevant as it will likely gain no further coverage. The coverage is about the party as a NOTA proponent, so it does belong here. Your interpretation of their Facebook posts as indicating a wider agenda is original research; we have to rely on what independent reliable sources said about the party. Fences&Windows 21:29, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 14:46, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Above and Beyond Party]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on None of the above. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150923174514/http://www.arunachaltimes.in/wordpress/2013/10/09/nota-voting/ to http://www.arunachaltimes.in/wordpress/2013/10/09/nota-voting/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151226135840/http://www.voteaboveandbeyond.org/why-politics-must-change.html to http://www.voteaboveandbeyond.org/why-politics-must-change.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100323011710/http://www.steveofstevenage.org.uk/ to http://www.steveofstevenage.org.uk/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091109000658/http://www.interfax.com.ua/eng/main/24082/ to http://www.interfax.com.ua/eng/main/24082/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040602135355/http://www.nota.org/ to http://www.nota.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:53, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on None of the above. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130927071428/http://www.hindustantimes.com/specials/coverage/MyIndia-MyVote/Chunk-HT-UI-MyIndiaMyVote-TopStories/Voters-have-right-to-reject-poll-panel-must-give-them-option-says-Supreme-Court/SP-Article10-1127779.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/specials/coverage/MyIndia-MyVote/Chunk-HT-UI-MyIndiaMyVote-TopStories/Voters-have-right-to-reject-poll-panel-must-give-them-option-says-Supreme-Court/SP-Article10-1127779.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100416164111/http://registers.electoralcommission.org.uk/regulatory-issues/regpoliticalparties.cfm?frmGB=1&frmPartyID=167&frmType=partydetail to http://registers.electoralcommission.org.uk/regulatory-issues/regpoliticalparties.cfm?frmGB=1&frmPartyID=167&frmType=partydetail
*Added  tag to http://registers.electoralcommission.org.uk/regulatory-issues/regpoliticalparties.cfm?frmGB=1&frmPartyID=867&frmType=partydetail
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100412003636/http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/news/says-change-Bristol-candidate/article-1979014-detail/article.html to http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/news/says-change-Bristol-candidate/article-1979014-detail/article.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100712004008/http://landlesspeasants.org/?p=158 to http://landlesspeasants.org/?p=158
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110218052948/http://noneoftheabove.com.au/about.htm to http://www.noneoftheabove.com.au/about.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.mvcwestsussex.org.uk/glossary.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070824204710/http://www.democrats.org/page/content/nota/home/ to http://www.democrats.org/page/content/nota/home/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110218052948/http://noneoftheabove.com.au/about.htm to http://www.noneoftheabove.com.au/about.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090726091633/http://nota.org.uk/ to http://www.nota.org.uk/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100402050804/http://www.nocandidate.org.uk/ to http://www.nocandidate.org.uk/
*Added  tag to http://votoenblanco.com.uy/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:34, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: *Pros and Cons of none of the above voting
*Why are people not voting, and how can none of the above voting affect that?
https://www.npr.org/2018/09/10/645223716/on-the-sidelines-of-democracy-exploring-why-so-many-americans-dont-vote
https://expmag.com/2019/12/the-voting-innovation-no-ones-talking-about/
https://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/23/world/ulyanovsk-journal-only-in-russia-none-of-the-above-is-on-ballot-and-wins.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Komalbadesha (talk • contribs) 05:31, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: What will I add to the article?