Talk:Aaron Taylor-Johnson

message: A Third Opinion is requested in a dispute between Lx 121 and myself myself over the inclusion of the date of birth and place of birth of Aaron Johnson. You can read our exchanges to date on his Talk Page and on mine. This is a summary of them:
Lx 121 insists on including this material, but does not include any inline citations for them. Instead, he merely lists four urls in the References section (claiming that the need for inline citations is just my personal opinion), two of which are of the Internet Movie Database, and two of which are fansites. Fan sites are not reliable sources, nor is imdb. When Lx asked me to point out where on Wikipedia this is stated, I directed him to the Reliable Sources Noticeboard, where there are countless discussions on the matter. On the first page of search results alone, there are 20 discussions, and of those, users in at least 15 of them indicate that imdb is not reliable, with the other discussions exhibiting a bit more ambiguity or dissent on the matter. This is easily a consensus, but Lx insists that it is not, without explaining why. I also pointed to this policy page, which says imdb is not reliable for notability. Lx's position is that this matter is not about notability but reliability. In my opinion, this is hair-splitting, since, if it is not reliable for notability, then why would it be reliable for verifiability? Lx insists that I am trying to impose my "opinion" on others. I tried to explain that the only "opinion" I had on imdb was that it was reliable, and only stopped using it when I was informed otherwise, but he has not responded to this, preferring only to repeat the original accusation, in violation of WP:AGF. He also claims that it is reliable because he and others in the film industry rely on it, and that for a site with user-generated content to "criticize" another is due to "professional jealousy". I tried to explain that this judgment is not a "criticism" nor "professional jealousy", but merely an observation that sources without full editorial control cannot be reliable, which is a core part of the Verfiability policy, but he argues as if "I use it, and so do others" somehow supersedes the Verifiability policy's criteria on editorial control.
Lx also insists that I should look for sources for this material myself. He also argues that since it's only the date and place of birth, that we can "assume" it's correct, unless I prove the material's inaccuracy. Dates and places of birth are not exempt from WP:V, and as I have tried to explain to others, WP:Burden requires the editor who favors adding or including the material in question to source it, and not others. This is not only policy, but is a far more fair and logical distribution of responsibility, since it properly assigns responsibility to each editor who adds material, instead of giving them a blank check to dump any ol' information in an article, and leave others to clean up the mess. I made this point to Lx, but he did not respond to refute WP:Burden, or any interpretation of it.
Lx also says that I am in danger of violating the The Three revert rule. By this he is referring to my reverting the material at 03:20, 24 July 2009 after he added it, and then again at 06:28, 25 July 2009 after an anonymous IP editor reverted it. As I tried to point out to Lx, that rule forbids reverting material more than three times within a 24-hour period, and doing so twice in 27 hours poses no danger of violation, specifically because it does not apply to reverting vandalism or blatant policy violations. He responded by insisting that what I did violated "its spirit". In fact, the intent of the 3RR is to discourage edit warring, and Good Faith reverts of a material that an editor believes clearly violates WP policy, first by one editor, and then by another editor 27 hours later, does not violate the spirit of 3RR. This is common sense, but is also indicated explicitly here. Once Lx began disputing the material in question with me, however, I stopped reverting it, as continuing to revert during such a discussion is not permitted. Indeed it is interesting that Lx himself did not abstain himself from doing this, as he continued to revert even after we began discussing our dispute, but somehow it's my prior reversions that violate this rule.
In addition, he continues to revert other edits I make to the article, even ones that he did not indicate previously that he disputed. Specifically, when I tried to delink a date (not remove it, mind you), citing the Manual of Style in my Edit Summary, Lx reverted it, commenting in his Edit Summary, "copyediting the intro & edit conflict, again." Whether he is doing this out of spite, or also wants to challenge the policy that indicates that dates not germane to an article's topic should not be linked (or thinks I am misinterpreting it), I don't know, but I posted a link to that policy on his Talk Page. Nightscream (talk) 17:35, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Third opinion on disputed material from IMDB

message: Can anyone find a verifiable, reliable source on Johnson's date and place of birth? Someone added High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, UK as his place of birth, and 13 June 1990 as his date of birth, but without a source that satisfies WP:RS, so I moved that info here per the discussion on Jimmy Wales' Talk Page until it can be sourced. Nightscream (talk) 00:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Material in need of sourcing

message: The opening section lists Angus, Thongs and Perfect Snogging as one of his 'earliest roles' and The Illusionist as a film he has appeared in as a 'young adult'.  Given that the Illusionist is a 2006 film and Angus is 2008, can this be changed? Sounds like distancing from a less flattering role.
Not done. That is a matter of copyediting and sourcing. Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "Sounds like distancing from a less flattering role." Sounds like I wasn't aware of when Angus came out when I wrote that. Please see WP:AGF. Nightscream (talk) 23:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{txl|editsemiprotected}} 

message: This is probably the third time I've edited his fimography section of the article. For future references, let's just leave his role in Kick-Ass as it is, okay? They're both the same character in the movie, he plays both parts, and that's the way he's listed in the credits. There's nothing erroneous about slashing in his superhero persona, especially when it's useful information for those who have yet to see the movie. This is an information source, and anyone reading the page needs to know he's the main character and starring role, not just some random mook that appears in the film. SJCrew (talk) 17:56, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmography 

message: ===Music Videos===
 Music Videos
Year	Video         	Notes
2011	Uberlin by REM	Dancer
Focusedontruth (talk) 18:11, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Focusedontruth, 13 March 2011 

message: Music Videos
Year	Video         	Notes
2011	Uberlin by REM	Dancer
Focusedontruth (talk) 18:11, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Music Videos

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 12:07, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree with that he is easily the most widely notable person by that name.RafikiSykes (talk) 21:31, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
*An admin should reinstate this.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 22:15, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Aaron Taylor-Johnson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150404070713/http://www.hgss.co.uk/default.aspx?id=373 to http://www.hgss.co.uk/default.aspx?id=373
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.whatsonstage.com/news/theatre/london/E0607221502/Rufus%2BSewell%2Bto%2BReturn%2Bto%2BStage%2Bin%2BMacbeth.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://variety.com/2013/film/news/elizabeth-olsen-bryan-cranston-circling-godzilla-1118065783/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-godzilla-trailer-widespread-destruction-bryan-cranston-20140225%2C0%2C942729.story
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://marvel.com/news/story/21563/official_elizabeth_olsen_aaron_taylor-johnson_join_avengers_age_of_ultron
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://popwatch.ew.com/2014/03/14/captain-america-the-winter-soldier-premiere/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140522213458/http://www.sheptonmalletjournal.co.uk/50-Shades-Grey-film-directed-Sam-Taylor-Johnson/story-19367650-detail/story.html to http://www.sheptonmalletjournal.co.uk/50-Shades-Grey-film-directed-Sam-Taylor-Johnson/story-19367650-detail/story.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150107145128/http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/style/articles/2015-01/05/best-dressed-men-2015 to http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/style/articles/2015-01/05/best-dressed-men-2015/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Aaron Johnson (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 16:01, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress