Talk:Acclaim Entertainment

message: The article lists a great number of games as being for "PC."  This is an ambigious category.  While a game for the Apple II and Commodore 64 are linked to their OS, the PC is not.  Is it DOS?  Microsoft Windows?  Linux?  All those operating systems run on a "PC."  Someone needs to go through and disambiguate those references.  I'd do it, but I am not familiar enough with the games to know which is which. — Frecklefoot | Talk 21:00, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  PC not a platform 

message: Should there be a section on some of the more "questionable" advertising stunts made by Acclaim? For example, they offered to pay for a person's funeral in exchange for rights to use the person's gravestone as a billboard to advertise Shadowman 2. Should incidents like that be included? MarkLucas 22:38, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acclaim's Advertising Stunts 

message: :Image:Valilogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 12:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Valilogo.jpg

message: :Image:Acclaim.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Acclaim.gif

message: My name is Steve Perry, and I was a UK employee of Acclaim hired as a Senior Executive Producer. I did not make any marketing decisions at all for Acclaim, and certainly wasn't responsible for the controversial decision cited in the article - a decision which was made by the Marketing Department in the USA. I am not aware of any other Steve Perry working for Acclaim, and would appreciate my name being removed from the article, or the inclusion of a statement that 'Steve Perry, a Senior Executive Producer in the Manchester UK studio, was NOT involved in the crass 'Turok' marketing decision'.
217.37.37.241 (talk) 13:10, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 'Controversies' section of the above Wikipedia page 

message: No need for a separate article - merge any useful content in Acclaim Sports into Acclaim Entertainment and restore redirect Polyamorph (talk) 13:32, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Acclaim Sports]] 

message: Why where games such as the first two Mortal Kombat games and various Simpsons-related games removed from the list? 137.25.148.134 (talk) 22:53, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about the games list