Talk:Kerplunk (album)

message: Reception section wasn't making sense and wasn't written too well, removed for now and will attempt to replace with references at a later date. Tbfoster (talk) 02:25, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: i removed the sentence "Billie Joe Armstrong said about the song "One of My Lies" that it was of a record no one has at Woodstock '94." from the album notes section as, aside from being worded very poorly it makes very little sense. especially when you consider the fact that the album was redorded in '91 so it would be kind of hard for a song off of it to be about an event that wouldn't take place for 3 years.69.211.149.52 18:45, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think what it meant was that the song was on an album which nobody owned, which was said at Woodstock 94. It's not notable enough for the article anyway. -Joltman 10:54, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  makes no sense 

message: Discuss the merge of Dominated Love Slave and 2000 Light Years Away into Kerplunk here. --JoeBlowfromKokomo 21:14, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: "As of June 2005, Kerplunk! has sold 680,000 units in the US, and is certified platinum."
I thought one million are required for platinum. -newkai | talk | contribs 11:06, July 24, 2005 (UTC)
680,000 units have been sold in the US.
worldwide sales have made it platinum. --JoeBlowfromKokomo 02:03, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  680,000 = Platinum? 

message: I'm not sure that the exclamation point in the title is necessary, especially seeing as it is not included on Green Day's own website and they do include the exclamation point in the title of International Superhits!.  The album cover itself doesn't even feature the exclamation point, only the back cover and a few other areas.  I feel that, especially because the typeset of Nimrod and Warning have recently been changed, this must be fixed.Ringer7 04:38, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be acceptable, only because the front and back cover are inconsistent. --PEJL 09:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

text: iTunes has a host of titular errors, they are not an authority.Ringer7 (talk) 23:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exclamation Point in Title 

message: I think the genre should be Pop Punk  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.136.120.111 (talk) 04:19, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pop Punk 

message: This album DID NOT reach #1 on the Billboard charts. It didn't even chart on Billboard at all. http://www.billboard.com/#/album/green-day/kerplunk/139584 The official Billboard website even says "This Album has never charted" on the album's page. Someone fix this, please. We don't want to lie, do we?  
And I've taken the liberty of deleting the entire "chart box" as everything in it was exaggerated. It didn't reach #1 in the UK or US and the sales were greatly exaggerated.—Preceding unsigned comment added by KILLER BOB11694 (talk • contribs) 14:11, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Billboard position 

message: I don't really see a point for this, so i'm gonna remove it. --Chickenguy12 (talk) 04:54, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singles from Kerplunk? 

message: I bought a used copy of Kerplunk today, and I found a joke-ish fictional story about a girl killing her parents to go on tour with Green Day. It's not in copies of the booklet anymore, but we might want to add it to the article. {{cite web | Rocker10000 (talk) 16:42, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional Story In The Booklet? 

message: It says here that 17 January 1992 was the release date, but i have a discography book that says it was released December 1991? What should we do with this information - was this an limited edition initial release or something?--92.237.84.183 (talk) 15:10, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date 

message: Is this review giving the album a 6.2 or an 8.5? I can't tell from the text, and it seems to me like it would be the 6.2 because Kerplunk is listed before the other album's name just like 6.2 is listed before 8.5, but in the URL Kerplunk is listed second. The 8.5 in the ratings box here seems to have been here for some time. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 19:21, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review score unclear 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Kerplunk (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120225185749/http://new.music.yahoo.com/blogs/chart_watch/61449/week-ending-aug-8-2008-taylor-swift-returns/;_ylt=ArAeEgxOOW0tUjDN0w.P8IAPwiUv?page=2 to http://new.music.yahoo.com/blogs/chart_watch/61449/week-ending-aug-8-2008-taylor-swift-returns/;_ylt=ArAeEgxOOW0tUjDN0w.P8IAPwiUv?page=2#comments
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Substituted at 21:08, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment