lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Virgin Prunes

message: Isn't the band name just Virgin Prunes, where did "The" come from?
"The" Virgin Prunes is a variation, while Virgin Prunes is used mostly.
You can see it on their album covers Virgin Prunes CD covers at Discogs.com (82.43.99.178 (talk) 01:20, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Virgin Prunes, not "The" Virgin Prunes 

message: Please do not copy and paste material from virginprunes.com - it has happened twice so far, and is a clear copyright violation. I have emailed the maintainers of the virginprunes.com web site, and in response they have clearly stated that they do not give permission for their content to be incorporated into the Wikipedia. As such, please respect the author's copyright, and do not copy any material from their web site - it does not help, and in fact it only creates work for others who need to revert any such copyright violations. -- All the best, Nickj (t) 02:00, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please do not copy and paste from virginprunes.com 

message: Where is the discography section?????Dr. Who 13:28, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography

message: I did a little bit of clean-up, mostly prose, and added some wikilinks as well. I didn't find entries for some of the albums; if I can find the time I may start those up. --aguasde13013 kickin' it just for you 17:54, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up
Talk:Fort Macleod

message: New record likely. https://weather.com/weather/monthly/l/CAXX1474:1:CA
B137 (talk) 01:24, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  104 deg F August 10 2018 

message: I was talking with a friend about this place, and he continually pronounced it "Mac-lee-odd", despite my suggestion that it was correctly pronounced "Macloud", as several Scots acquaintances of mine (two of the name itself) would aver.  Either one of us would be correct, as there is no mention in the article of its correct pronunciation.  If there is somebody who knows authoritatively, would they include a note to that effect please?162.196.161.203 (talk) 03:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a youtube video here of an interview with the then mayor of Fort Macleod in which the pronunciation is clearly "McLoud". That clinches it, so I have added the IPA equivalent as a courtesy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.196.161.203 (talk) 20:35, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Nue

message: Is the japanese blackbird the thrush known as "zoothera dauma" (scientific name)? Or what would it's scientific name be?
Yes, that's right. Nue isn't a blackbird, but a White's thrush (Zoothera dauma), whose common name today in Japan is toratugumi (トラツグミ in hiragana katakana, 虎鶫 in kanji). The bird warbles in a thin voice in a forest at night, so this makes people feel creepy.
(1) This feature of this bird explains the composition of the kanji of nue; nue (鵺) consists of night (夜) and bird (鳥). (2) This trait of this bird's warble also gives an account for the etymology of nue, the ledendary chimera; according to the legend, nue warbles in a creepy voice like a thrush, the original nue. Therefore, strictly speaking, nue is a name for the bird, not a name for the legendary beast; the beast is only a creature warbling in a nue-like voice. In the common use in Japan, however, the word nue refers to the beast, rarely to the bird.60.236.113.249 14:24, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thrush

message: This PS2, PS3, Xbox 360 and PC platform MMO has a Notorious Monster named Nue of the Tiger family.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.185.197.6 (talk) 00:38, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final Fantasy XI 

message: Nue is a 10 minute song by the Japanese Metal band, Onmyouza.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.167.246.137 (talk) 15:43, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Onmyouza
Talk:Heavy as a Really Heavy Thing

message: Gene says it's 42, but it is actually only 33. I've placed this fact back in- and if it's removed again, at least remove the whole Hoglan quote- it's incorrect, so why keep it? Chiiild (talk) 11:33, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "S.Y.L." F-count
Talk:Killing Me Softly (film)

message: Seems to me that we have a slight dispute over which of the images to use. I personally prefer the one I uploaded, Killing-Me-Softly-Film.png, but I'm open to persuasion. Rob Church Talk | Desk 02:20, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I replaced the existing image with the poster for the unrated version of the film :Image:Killing_Me_Softly_Poster.jpg. It has less artifacting than the previous image, and is only slightly bigger in size. --Fizan 11:19, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cover Image

message: Is it necessary to show pictures from the sex scene? Wikipedia is, after all, an encyclopedia, and the entry for "pornography" usually isn't accompanied with pictures. If there is no logical reason for the pictures to be there, they shouldn't be. They add to the article in no other way than either a.) arousing some high-school kid using a family computer, or b.) unnecessarily showing pure gratuitous nudity to anyone who comes to the article (children can use the internet, too). I'm reworking the article, if you feel that it needs to be changed back, please discuss it on my talk page. Thank you. Zchris87v 09:25, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: Heather showed her boobies! Yay! Tool-apc (talk) 00:03, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heather Graham 

message: was the sex on this show real?!?!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Weatherbed (talk • contribs) 20:35, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I highly doubt that it was real, as this is Heather Graham we're talking about here, but still, it looks pretty real, and it'd be nice if it was. Tool-apc (talk) 01:06, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: sex
Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion

message: Talk:Gibraltar/primary sources
Talk:Gibraltar/secondary sources
2 pages created by  back in 2010/2011 and have never been used.  The editor hasn't logged in since 2020.  As housekeeping I tried to suggest deletion at MFD.  When I try to add I get a malformed code "{{mfd|1={{mfd|1==Unsorted=".
I can't see what I'm doing wrong? WCMemail 10:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, nominated as a Speedy G2. WCMemail 17:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village Pump (proposals) § Bump XfD heading sizes  about potentially increasing the header size of XfD discussions. Primefac (talk) 06:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at [[:Wikipedia:Village Pump (proposals)#Bump XfD heading sizes|Wikipedia:Village Pump (proposals) §&nbsp;Bump XfD heading sizes]] 

message: Silly "humour" essay that encourages users to violate WP:NLT. 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:81C1:298E:8E2A:1CE6 (talk) 12:45, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Noting here for reference that this page was nominated at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Yes legal threats following this IP editor's request. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 06:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  MFD request: [[Wikipedia:Yes legal threats]] 

message: On the main article, regarding the deletion of one own talk page or sandbox, it says this:
"If you wish to clear your user talk page or sandbox, just blank it."
Does this mean, just Edit it and delete everything (which leaves a copy in the View History page), or is there a tool that actually blanks it? Some clarification would be appreciated. Raven-14 (talk) 12:45, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes; the policy which governs what you can/can't do with your own talkpage is at WP:UOWN. More experienced users tend to archive material they want off their talkpages rather than blanking it. How to do that can be found at WP:ARCHIVE. Grandpallama (talk) 13:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at WT:Deletion process § Deletion sorting should be advertised on all XFD venues.  Nickps (talk) 21:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[:WT:Deletion process#Deletion sorting should be advertised on all XFD venues|WT:Deletion process §&nbsp;Deletion sorting should be advertised on all XFD venues]]
Talk:Piebald (band)

message: I love piebald, but this is one of the most POV articles I've ever read.  It reads like a press release.  I would fix it, but I agree with everything that's been written.  Someone who likes them less should do the work.  Antimatter--talk-- 06:27, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Travis Shettel really does warrant his own article, or at the very least a red link.  He's certainly a proficient enough lyricist, and he's started two reasonably successful bands.  Also, can someone find some free use pictures of piebald?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.231.124.65 (talk) 20:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Travis
Talk:508th Infantry Regiment (United States)

message: This page should be moved to U.S. 508th Parachute Infantry Regiment to conform to other units in Wikipedia. WikiDon 02:45, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Page should be moved

message: Isn't it highly unlikely that an 82nd paratrooper (Robert P. Mathias) was the first casualty of D-day?
As I understand, mission Albany (101st drop) started at around 00.48hrs whilst mission Boston (82nd drop) started about one hour later at around 01.51hrs. As the 101st airborne divison also suffered many casualties during their flight and drop it is more likely a 101st trooper / officer is the first American killed on D-Day.
--Dutchdoc (talk) 14:48, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: first American officer killed by German fire on D-Day??
Talk:Milsons Point

message: This page was moved from "Milsons Point" to "Milsons Point, New South Wales" as per the naming convention set out at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (places) – Ianblair23 02:46, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: It appears that this locality was previously known as Dind's Point. See for example Bell's Life in Sydney 28 May 1853. William Dind was a theatrical and sporting promoter whose residence was in Alfred Street South, on the corner of the present Fitzroy Street. Dind Street is a little further south of this intersection. See Dind's obit. in Town and Country Journal 2 February 1895 Bluedawe 22:45, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dind's Point 
Talk:517th Parachute Infantry Regiment

message: This page should be moved to U.S. 517th Parachute Infantry Regiment to conform to other units in Wikipedia. WikiDon 02:51, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Page should be moved

message: I see why "U.S." was added to "1st Infantry", many countries have a "1st Infantry".  But 517th PIR is a unique name.  Do we really need to do a move (and the resulting disambig.)? Beanbatch 21:27, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: adding "US"
Talk:506th Infantry Regiment (United States)

message: Uh hello? We have them listed for overlord and marketgarden, but the bulge? I'm going to add it, anyone who sees its lacking in anything please add. --LtWinters 23:54, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Battle of the Bulge

message: Why does it say stuff like Soebel was the initial officer in charge and Speirs the last ? It makes it sound like the 506th ceased to be after WW2. I think whoever wrote that part is confusing fiction (Band of Brothers) with reality.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.105.148.84 (talk) 14:21, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notables 

message: "The demolition section of Regimental Headquarters Company inspired the book and subsequent film, The Dirty Dozen."
Umm.. What?
What does this have to do with the subject?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.192.19.110 (talk • contribs) 
:I deleted the line. The relationship is extremely tenuous; in his novel, E. M. Nathanson made no reference to the 506th.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk  18:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification? 

message: Is this a typo? Shouldn't that be 506AIR?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hitesh0630 (talk • contribs) 22:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Unit designations can be confusing. I've flagged both paragraphs in the section as needing citations.Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk  21:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The colors of Company A, 504AIR were reactivated as HHC, 1st Airborne Battle Group, 506th Infantry" 

message: The 506th Parachute Infantry has a squadron in Enlisted, as shown by the eagle with the dice, and the name 70.172.125.204 (talk) 07:12, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New appearance in Game
Talk:Tyndall Air Force Base

message: In order for this template to be displayed on this page we need to have some information pertaining to BRAC and this facility. Because their is no information on the page, I am moving the templete here until the information can be uploaded. For more information, Template_talk:BRAC#Instructions click here. TomStar81 03:31, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: BRAC template

message: The caption says it is a westward looking photo, this is about 140 degrees off. That photo is taken from a aircraft to the Southwest of the base, with the camera pointing East Northeast. I used to fly into TAFB nearly everyday for nearly three years. Need more validation, look at a modern photo or in Google Earth. You will see the SW - NE runway remnants (it is actually a closed taxiway now) and the northern taxiway is the Hot Pad now. Cessnac172r (talk) 00:03, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in the 1944 photo caption 

message: Remember visiting the base for the first time in 1981 - besides TDY a/c, there were squadrons of T-33s, F-101Bs, and F-106s, not to mention a ramp full of PQM-102s (think those were still around). Was there for WT 82, 84, 86, and 94 too when the place was really hopping with a dozen teams of F-4s, F-15s, F-16s, and CF-18s on top of all the local birds and TDY targets. Can't imagine how slow things are now with just one squadron of F-22s permanently stationed there (and maybe some QF-4s) - there's got to be more airplanes on poles around PC than sitting on the ramp...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.48.11 (talk) 12:29, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: BTW, the two F-22 squadrons are the 43rd and 95th (yes, Mr. Bones is back as of 11 Oct 2013).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.51.66.32 (talk) 22:54, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Must be mighty quiet on the flightline these days 
Talk:Robins Air Force Base

message: In order for this template to be displayed on this page we need to have some information pertaining to BRAC and this facility. Because their is no information on the page, I am moving the templete here until the information can be uploaded. For more information, click here. TomStar81 03:32, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Base Realignment and Closure, 2005

message: As someone who works in the History Office of WR-ALC, it is obvious that this article is not complete or entirely correct.  There needs to be footnotes citing sources instead of just listing them randomly at the bottom of the page.  You can't write an article and just put in the information that you deem important; everyone needs to be careful that what they put on the internet is factual. Paisley Gumdrops (talk) 17:58, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The article has very little footnotes or citations. I have added a citation template in hopes that it will get the attention it needs from appropriate users. Brinkley32 (talk) 22:49, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: This article needs to be re-worked....

message: An over-the-horizon radar  was built in the 1980's on Robins, to give a little bit of extra warning of an incoming submarine-launched ballistic missile, but was never more than minimal tested for fear of microwaving Savannah. I'm surprised that I can't find any info on it here or there or anywhere! --Pawyilee (talk) 13:03, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Over-the-horizon radar
Talk:Hickam Air Force Base

message: In order for this template to be displayed on this page we need to have some information pertaining to BRAC and this facility. Because their is no information on the page, I am moving the templete here until the information can be uploaded. For more information, click here. TomStar81 03:32, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Base Realignment and Closure, 2005

message: Who in the world really believes Hickam AFB became Hickam Field when the joint base was established?  A little authority, please. --Lineagegeek (talk) 01:07, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hickam Field? 

message: The common name (and it appears to be official as well, given some of the sources) is Hickam Air Force Base as seen though: http://aviation.hawaii.gov/airfields-airports/oahu/hickam-fieldair-force-base/ ; http://www.military.com/base-guide/hickam-air-force-base ; https://m.facebook.com/HickamAMC/ (an official Air Force Facebook page); https://militarybases.com/hickam-afb-air-force-base-in-honolulu-hi/ ; http://www.airforcemag.com/MagazineArchive/Magazine%20Documents/2016/November%202016/1116namesakes.pdf ; http://www.15wing.af.mil/Library/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/376295/hickam-passenger-terminal-amc/ ; http://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/104483/pacific-air-forces/ ; https://www.stripes.com/news/remains-of-3-marines-killed-in-osprey-crash-near-australia-recovered-1.484496#.WbrhrEhMHYU. If anyone disageees please comment below. Garuda28 (talk) 19:16, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose rename to Hickam Air Force Base 
Talk:Sirajul Islam

message: Since there hasn't been any expansion of the article in the last two years, I think we can just merge it with Banglapedia. As it stands now, it doesn't merit its own article with only 2 sentences. If there aren't any objections, I'll merge it into Banglapedia. --Ragib 08:21, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a very nice idea. Please, do. Cheers. Aditya Kabir 09:24, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Agree. Not notable enough for own article. I'm surprised it's lasted two years. Could easily be a candidate for CSD :) → AA (talk • contribs) — 20:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just read the AfD and am surprised that being a chairman of board of editors makes him notable. I guess if there were multiple non-trivial sources on him, it would stand. → AA (talk • contribs) — 20:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The merge tag has been in place for over a month. I will therefore do the merge next week (unless one of you guys do it first). → AA (talk) — 20:39, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have started to expand the article. The first step was collecting a few sources. I hope I can get this stuff to at least a B-class in a week or something. This guy is really notable as he has edited most of the bigger tomes on Bangladesh history, chaired the department of history in Dhaka university and the center for historical research of the university, is one of the core people of Asiatic Sciety of Bangladesh and the Banglapedia Foundation, and author of numerous fundamental research in BAngladesh history. Just give it a week. Cheers. Aditya(talk • contribs) 21:08, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No problems. → AA (talk) — 10:23, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Sigh* Not getting there yet. Aditya(talk • contribs) 02:45, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: This page was created in the name of Sirajul Islam, the Chief Editor of Banglapedia: the National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh. Later, some editors became confused and started treating him as Muhammad Sirajul Islam, the former vice chancellor of Islamic University, Bangladesh. They added some information to this page regarding him. It needs to be corrected. Factcheckerhuman (talk) 14:39, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Need Major Correction
Talk:Abby Hayes

message: I have only read three of these twenty books but I love them! I am hoping to get the whole series for Christmas. I recently did a book report on the #2 book Declaration of Independence. This series is amazingly intertaining. I'm not really sure why I'm hooked on the series. The reason I first picked out the book is because I read on the back it was about a young girl who loves to write. I encourage any young girls that love to read to check it out.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodolcountryg1rl (talk • contribs) 00:21, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Love This Series! 

message: Just out of curiosity, because there seems to be no mention of whether or not it did. I'm just suspicious of that because #20 seems to be the last book in the series... Anyone agree?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.76.29.118 (talk) 16:29, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did the series end? 
Talk:Esquivalience

message: Sorry about removing the deletion sign. However I do believe the article could be a good one with some work and definitely relevant, I think it is a worthy and interesting piece of trivia. Comments welcome.
:I remember reading that mapmakers add nonexistent features to their maps so they'll know if other maps are illegal copies. Brian Pearson (talk) 05:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevancy 

message: ... It's in there, too - also based on the 'Oxford American Dictionaries'. Of course, there's no indication that it's entirely made up - which is a shame, because it's a rather useful word! --HiddenInPlainSight 11:45, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  MacOS X dictionary 

message: I know it isn't considered a reliable source, which is why I haven't added it myself, but I think we should link to the Urban Dictionary entry for this word, which was apparently written by Jakob Maria Mierscheid. :) JulesH 18:45, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urban Dictionary 

message: As soon as a word is created and given a meaning, then it is a real word. It doesn't matter HOW it was created, and it doesn't need the consensus approval of the world's dictionaries. You could use this word in context, in conversation, and somebody familiar with it would know what you mean. An example of it being used in context, if such a thing can be found, should be included to demonstrate this. Sordyne (talk) 20:24, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Fake Word" Fallacy