Talk:RocknRolla

message: Why only quote negative opinions? Why claim the film is 'very similar' to his previous films, when it just isn't; yes it's the same theme, but that does not mean it's a similar film.
As it happens I am not a Guy Ritchie fan; but I'm disgusted at this one sided approach to his work.
Heenan73 (talk) 23:34, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Now it's the opposite and the bias is in favour of the film, because it only mentions specific cherrypicked positive opinions and the overall lukewarm reception. To be balanced it'd need to have prominent negative opinions too. Reinistalk 15:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Too Much Opinion

message: *BREAKING: Guy Ritchie Plans ‘RocknRolla’ Trilogy With Thandie Newton
Headline. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 21:31, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation dump

message: Jeremy Piven plays Mickey NOT ROMAN. Ludacris aka Chris Bridges plays ROMAN. Stop making false changes all online sources state this: movies.yahoo.com and imdb.com  67.167.180.64 (talk) 14:20, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roman/Jeremy Piven 

message: Is the film's title intended to be a reference to the Judas Priest album and/or song of virtually identical name?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.59.154.74 (talk) 00:15, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judas Priest reference 

message: There was a misunderstanding Template:Cite_news says a little different to Template:Cite_web, it does specify that the date parameter you should "write out the month in words" and you'll note I only changed the accessdate value but left those alone. I see now for accessdate it says "in the same format as the rest of the article". This is unusual for recent Film and television articles, which tend to use the format 2009-10-31 (which makes sorting really simple) so I got to thinking it was the preferred format but the there is no recommendation, not even a weak one (unless I read another completely different Cite Template). Since the article was already formatted you way I'm forced to leave the dates in the existing format you seem to prefer, even if it is unusual.  
Interestingly the guidelines explicitly specify dates should not be wikilinked. Unfortunately wikilinked dates can be interpreted automatically by wikipedia and shown according to the users preference but ordinary dates cannot, which would avoid some of this kind of disagreement. I'll leave the dates as they are but I would encourage you to look at the many film articles that use the other date format and reconsider it for the accessdate. I suppose I can at least be grateful you appreciate clarity and have not abbreviated the dates to Oct. and Nov. and suchlike.  -- Horkana (talk) 19:01, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: For what its worth Template:Cite episode specifies that airdate must be formatted YYYY-MM-DD and I misremembered that as being a requirement for accessdate. -- Horkana (talk) 21:53, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date formatting 

message: Just wondering why he has his own section. I don't know what they're called but it's at the very bottom of the page where it has [show] next to it.
It seems weird to me that some rapper/actor gets such a special mention on the page when people that played even larger rolls, Gerard Butler etc. don't have one.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.104.178.32 (talk) 12:12, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That is called a WP:NAVBOX. I'm not sure the Ludacris box really belongs on this article, he was hardly the star of this film. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:06, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does Ludacris have his own section at the bottom?