lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Vogt

message: "Further information: Grafschaft " where? did the links get mixed up?64.129.127.5 (talk) 16:31, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further information 

message: An editor is changing wojt to vogt over Wikipedia, claiming that vogt is an English word. Thoughts? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  17:03, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Is vogt an English word?

message: The language of large sections this article would benefit greatly from the editorial attention of someone who not only understands the subject but can also can write lucidly. 
Take, for example, the 110-word-long (!) sentence in the section headed "Church vogt". It opens with this clause:
  
» The three-way struggle for control of the Vogtei of the more important abbacies, played out among the central monarchy, the Church and the territorial nobility, was pretty well established as a prorogative of the nobility « 
*1) I don't believe there is any such noun as "prorogative" in English.
*2) Even if the writer meant "prerogative", it is hard to see in what way a struggle between three parties could be, or become, an exclusive right or privilege, let alone be established as the prerogative of just one of them.
-- Picapica (talk) 23:09, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Near impenetrable language 

message: The one-paragraph lede is an unreadable mess. All too often Wikipedia is not very user-friendly. --Lubiesque (talk) 21:35, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreadable mess 

message: seems like 100% overlap. I think advocatus is the more international name, and the better name to keep?--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 09:13, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Please name any difference? Vogt is just the German word for Advocatus. The French word already links to advocatus. --Andrew Lancaster (talk) 08:53, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are incorrect. Vogt is literally the modern German word which is an "advocatus" in medieval documents. There were several types, and none were definitely hereditary in the earliest phases.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 20:06, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree on the basic point. But there is also an evolution over time. In any case, to make the best article possible we really should get one article.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 20:06, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge proposal: advocatus 

message: The closest English equivalent both in function and responsibility is the sheriff, so it is surprising why it is not linked - ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.34.114.6 (talk) 17:48, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not think this is a a simple equivalence, and there are many types of "manager" which would be equally close. The position of vogt or advocatus evolved into many different variants in different areas. Maybe some particular vogts came close to a sheriff, but I don't think that is what unites all the vogts under one term.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 21:31, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: The Sheriff
Talk:Albéric Magnard

message: The first two sentences of the biographical sketch are entirely misleading: Magnard lived his whole life long from the wealth of his father, it was only his father's social connections which he didn't want to profit from. Without his father's money he couldn't have afforded not to be performed for years, he couldn't have afforded his manor in Baron and the publication of his compositions on his own costs. This aspect of the article needs reworking. - Also in French reviews you don't read much about Magnard's affinities with Bruckner, Wagner and Mahler, but instead of his inspiration by Rameau whom he favorized. But I am no musician to be able to validate such arguments. - My source is, by the side, André Segond (Ed.): Bérénice d'Albéric Magnard, Cahiers de l'opera de Marseille, Arles 2001, with an extensive biography by Simon-Pierre Perret. -- 84.162.119.131 05:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Financial Situation 

message: by whom? Searches on "French Bruckner" as often turn up César Franck or French Bruckner conductors. So - citation needed, or, especially given the succeeding "their styles were quite different"- not very good Wikipedia-writing at all - I'd ditch that entirely and suggest finding something better. His style has in fact very little to do with Bruckner, whose orchestral style was very different; and Magnard's tendency to use movement headers like "Sonate", "Danses", etc. has nothing to do with the Austrian composer at all. Schissel | Sound the Note! 00:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "French Bruckner" 

message: It is claimed that the four symphonies foreshadow Mahler. This may be a reasonable claim for the first three, which were written before Mahler's music was well-known. But certainly it cannot apply to the 4th if the dating to 1913 is accurate, since this is after Mahler's death. JBritnell (talk) 23:45, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Foreshadows Mahler"
Talk:Pastor Maldonado

message: Isn't he going to be the first Venezuelan driver in the Formula 1? 99% sure he is the first Venezuelan since at least 1990s. 82.141.72.152 (talk) 12:31, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: According to wiki articles about Venezuelan F1 drivers he was the third. But first in 27 years, the last before him seems to be Johnny Cecotto who drove his last GP in 1984. 82.141.66.232 (talk) 08:33, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

text: No, there isn't any doubt about that. At least almost any news reported he was the first Venezuelan winner. 85.217.36.130 (talk) 01:38, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first? 

message: Is Maldonado's birthday today (9 March) or tomorrow (10 March)? Although his official site says 10 March, most other sources say 9 March (he's got also an Italian personal document with 9/3/85 as birth date), and today on Twitter said thank for the birthday wishes. I tried to contact his website for a clarification but unsuccessfully. 79.11.80.8 (talk) 20:06, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's today, according to his wife: . Bretonbanquet (talk) 20:13, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthday 
Talk:Marin Marais

message: Good day
The article mentions the following sentence: «145 Pieces for viol (ca. 1680), about 100 pieces were published in Books I – III». Could you please provide information on where this information comes from and which are the remaining 45 pieces?
Jestet11 (talk) 06:20, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Michel Richard Delalande

message: According to Anne Sinclair in "My Grandfather's Gallery ". Can anyone say what the theme was called? Julianna Lees (talk) 22:07, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bizet used a theme by De la Lande in "Carmen " 

message: All the information on the very comprehensive French version of the article needs to be translated by someone bilingual and added to the English version. FlyingScotsman72 (talk) 02:34, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of the French article
Talk:Southern Federal University

message: Agree: I agree no point in two stub articles on basically the same thing.
Disagree: Rostov State University is not identical with the Southern Federal University. It is only one of its parts. Omatosan 15:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Can anyone explain how SFU works?  Is Rostov State still an extant entity, under a larger umbrella of SFU?  All Rostov State mentions on the official website seem to have been replaced with SFU.  Which would lead me to believe thatthe old name is gone.  But my russian certainly isn't up to the task.  steventity 04:22, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Help from Russian speakers
Talk:Robert de Févin

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This article is B-class; with the addition of adequate inline citations and an image (and possibly audio, if possible), it might arguably be A-class; read my review on the comments page.  Questions or comments can be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 15:09, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:George Onslow (composer)

message: This article seems to have been written by an enthusiast. For instance: "His work was admired by both Beethoven and Schubert, the latter modelling his own 2-cello quintet (D.956) on those of Onslow and not, as is so often claimed, on those of Boccherini. Robert Schumann, perhaps the foremost music critic during the first part of the 19th century, regarded Onslow’s chamber music on a par with that of Mozart, Haydn and Beethoven. Mendelssohn was also of this opinion."
I know of no indication that Beethoven was even aware of Onslow. The rest I can't speak to, but it seems more than mildly surprising. There are, of course, no footnotes for any of this. I hope somebody can truth-check this, or remove the unsupported statements.Opus131 (talk) 03:20, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It's also completely uncited.  There is a long list of references, which is highly improbably used in so short and so slight an article.  Definitely needs major work.HammerFilmFan (talk) 17:16, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I am now rewriting.--Smerus (talk) 12:35, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Truth of fancy? 
Talk:Jean Mouton

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This article is B-class; it lacks a complete works list (which a composer of this notability probably ought to have), images, and inline citations.  My review is on the comments page; questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 18:27, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Carpentras (composer)

message: Actually I woudn't say he was French. Provence was not already french (not even was it using French language in any instance) and at some poitn he wasn't even fully provençal since Carpentras was in a papal possession of Provence. Though, unlike refering to him as a French man, it would'nt be wrong to state he was provençal. Does anyone object this swich here ?--Lembeye (talk) 22:29, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: SWICH? onselete. Sorry Obselete. 116.12.90.146 (talk) 05:30, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Jacquet of Mantua

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This article is B-class; it lacks a complete works list, images, and inline citation.  My full review is on the comments page; questions and comments should go here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 15:44, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Pierre Certon

message: I am not sure if this is for everyone, but the link didn't work for me. 24.21.6.252 02:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you mean the external link to the Werner Icking Music Archive?  If so it isn't working for me either.  The site may be down.  I hope it's not a long-term problem.  Antandrus  (talk) 02:40, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad Link?

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composer project review of its B-class articles.  This article is B-class; it could use and image and/or sound, a listing of works, more inline cites. Read the full review on the comments page. Magic♪piano 16:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Mathieu Gascongne

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  The article is B-class, but would benefit from some improvement; read the details on the comments page.  Questions or comments can be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 16:14, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Pierre Moulu

message: I have reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of B-class articles.  You can find my detailed review on the comments page.  The article's main defect is lack of images.  B-class, but very near A. Feel free to leave comments here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 16:35, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Composers Project Review

message: In the "Music" section some of Moulu's supposed works are said to be of disputed authorship, but in the following list of his works several are said quite positively to be by other composers.  Why then are they in a list of Moulu's works?  The absence of footnotes in that section makes this problem harder to sort out. --Antiquary (talk) 10:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: List of works
Talk:Jean Maillard

message: Jean Maillart (or Mallard), a French poet at the court of Francis I and then at the court of Henry VIII, ...
http://www.bl.uk/manuscripts/FullDisplay.aspx?ref=Royal_MS_2_a_xvi
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psalter_of_Henry_VIII  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.30.227 (talk) 13:31, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, different guy. Since they both worked at the court they may have even known each other though. Antandrus (talk) 16:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this the same man?

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This article is B-class; there is an academic source that might be used to expand it.  My full review is on the comments page; questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 18:41, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review

message: I've removed this addition by , presuming it was meant for the talk page:
"He urges the above authors to reconsider their description of the cantus firmus treatment in the motets: for example, the long notes are likelier to appear in the tenor than the top voice, and far more often, the preexistent chant (if identifiable) will be presented in segments in a more migratory manner within a looser texture of paraphrase. Furthermore, the authors should mention that many of Maillard's works appeared only in Spain, in manuscripts, and that this may suggest that he lived there at some point (after his disappearance from Paris?). Stay tuned for more of his works to appear in print!
This expressive music deserves many more modern performances, and recordings too, in the humble opinion of RHR." Antandrus  (talk) 02:14, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed from article
Talk:Ferdinand Hérold

message: What a ridiculous statement.
This article is written in very poor English. Reads like a translation. Needs thorough sub-editing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.68.94.86 (talk) 08:57, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "which had never been done before" 

message: I am not an Hérold expert. I there someone who could be more specific concerning the four piano concertos? — Robert Greer (talk) 22:59, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  four piano concertos 

message: After pondering the above, I've tried to combine the two approaches, dealing with the accent at the outset and then going with the usual accented form, thus:
:Louis Joseph Ferdinand Herold (28 January 1791 – 19 January 1833), better known as Ferdinand Hérold (), was a French composer. He was celebrated in his lifetime for his operas, but also wrote many pieces for the piano, orchestra, and the ballet. He is best known today for the ballet La Fille mal gardée and the overture to the opera Zampa. Born in Paris to a musical family, Hérold trained ...
With this footnote (all duly cited, of course)
:
Will this wash? Glad of comments. Tim riley talk 13:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: There being no adverse comments, I'll be bold and post a new version. Tim riley talk 12:34, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion

message: Should that be Choquet? 99.229.116.186 (talk) 18:57, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It should indeed (mea culpa) and is now changed throughout. Thank you for pointing it out! Tim riley talk 19:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chouqet
Talk:Jacques Duphly

message: Isn't it perhaps a tad harsh to suggest that all of the Quatrieme Livre is half-hearted? La Pothoüin, for example, is beautiful - probably among the most tender pieces of Duphly's output.  --Irishmaestro (talk) 18:36, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book 4

message: This article was flagged for copyright concerns at Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2013_April_5. While I cannot see the entire source, a spot check of significant terms supports that complaint.  Material seems to have been introduced to the article with this edit of 2009. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright
Talk:Henri Duparc (composer)

message: Several other sources indicate that Serenade florentine, to words by Lahor, was written in about 1880. The Serenade, to words by Gabriel Marc, was written in about 1868/9 and published in the opus 2 group. The table has these composition dates switched.
However, I haven't yet changed the table because I'm not completely sure which of the 2 songs some information in other columns belongs to. Is anyone in a position to check more carefully the other details? Orfeocookie (talk) 09:16, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: The two Serenades have been mixed together
Talk:Richfield High School (Minnesota)

message: Attempted to verify policy changes in 2014. but did not find them in RHS policies.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.17.194.1 (talk) 19:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Policy changes of 2005
Talk:Jacques Mauduit

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This article is B-class; the discussion of his works (especially his surviving works) is deficient.  My full review is on the comments page; questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 15:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Claude Le Jeune

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This article is B-class; its main lack is a complete works list, but it should also have some inline citations.  My full review is on the comments page; questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 15:47, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Jean-Joseph Mouret

message: Am I missing something?  I had supposed that the dates given after the listed works were when he wrote them.  Isn't that the norm for composer articles?  But here there are works dated 1741/1742, several years after his death.  Davidships (talk) 20:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Posthumous works? 

message: Find a picture for him add it 206.85.84.192 (talk) 15:31, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why meant Jean  joseph mouret
Talk:Henri Tomasi

message: This article is in need of major reworking to account for the severe lack of references.
170.223.143.19 (talk) 16:29, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Glad to see that's been fixed in the 8 years since the template went up. --Jemiller226 (talk) 03:09, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Severe lack of references
Talk:Clément Janequin

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This is a pretty good article; very near A-class.  It does need at least some inline citations to substantiate some of its claims.  My full review is on the comments page; questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 01:38, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Delain

message: Is the logo necessary? It looks imho ugly in this context, and I think there are enough pictures in the article to illustrate the band; and an additional non-free image is not necessary. -- Bryan (talk|commons) 07:43, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: Should they have all the record labels they were on in the labels or just the one that they are on now? Delain123 (talk) 21:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  record labels 
Talk:Monsieur de Sainte-Colombe

message: Louis XIV should be at least mentioned in this article. Badagnani 19:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a good deal of ill-digested and conflicting material here about M. de Sainte-Colombe's identity. It needs expanding and resolving.--Wetman (talk) 00:36, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Louis

message: In spite of its confident Wikipedia filename, the image is unlikely to be of M. de Sainte-Colombe, whose first name we don't have. Or of any Frenchman of the second half of the C17.  Where did it come from? --Wetman (talk) 15:46, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It had been re-added but I removed it once again. --Hegvald (talk) 09:37, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Too much genealogy. While information about immediate family is valuable (when known) and a bit beyond that may be motivated if it provides relevant background to a subject's work or social position, there is now far too much about a family to which he apparently "may or may not be linked", as the article currently states. If this family is of historical significance, any details about its distant origins and mediaeval members that were possibly-or-possibly-not-related to the composer should be in a separate article. --Hegvald (talk) 09:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genealogy 

message: I cleaned up some of the grammar and readability, and restructured the article with clearer headings.  I did add two sentences which were translated from the French page (about how little is known about his parents or dates, and also about his teachers) -- the information is interesting, but needs a citation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.194.72.18 (talk) 23:07, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  27 April 2016 - Structural changes (and a minor content addition) 
Talk:René Leibowitz

message: Composer Marina Scriabina also studied with Leibowitz in Paris but has been removed from the main article. See:  Cohen, Aaron I. (1987). International encyclopedia of women composers (Second edition, revised and enlarged ed.). New York. p. 630. ISBN 0-9617485-2-4. OCLC 16714846.
T. E. Meeks (talk) 21:19, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: She is not mentioned in Grove, but there is nonetheless no reason why this person should not be mentioned in the footnote, along with RL's numerous minor pupils, as long as the citation is changed to comply with WP:CITEVAR. The comment (see edit page) can then be removed. Tim riley talk 21:35, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marina Scriabina Studied with Leibowitz
Talk:Louis Diémer

message: Some suggestions for improvement as the article is expanded:
*Appropriate infobox should be added 
*Photograph/portrait should be added from a source with a free license, if available
*Basic biographical information required, including place of birth, dates for education, positions held, any family details
*Article needs expanding and should emphasise reasons for notability of subject
*After expansion, article should be divided into appropriate subheadings
*Information on works should be expanded, and references required
*Key works list would be interesting
*References should be added, preferably in the inline format  
*External links to useful online resources should be added if available
Espresso Addict 11:53, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review comments
Talk:Sandrin

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This article is B-class; it could use an image, and it lacks a complete (known) works list; read my review on the comments page. Questions or comments can be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 14:58, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:François Francoeur

message: The French, German and Spanish WP articles all say he was born on 21 September.  The Russian version agrees with us, 8 September.  None of them seem to make any reference to there being any doubt, but since they don't all agree, how can we be sure either is the correct date?  I've also seen 8 August and 28 September in my searches.  What's the most reliably recorded date?  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 00:37, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth