lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Roan (color)

message: The Following page disputes there is such a thing as a lethal Roan gene.
http://www.geocities.com/Baja/Outback/2936/Roan.html
The relevant quote is:
There is no known study documenting a lethal condition associated with a homozygous roan horse.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.4.163.56 (talk • contribs) 20:19, 1 June 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a study now, and it refutes the theory.  For details see Dr. Bowling's study as noted at bottom of arcticle now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glassjar99 (talk • contribs) 04:08, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Lethal roan gene?

message: I really think this nice section belongs in the sabino article, not here, so parking it until it can be moved.  Also, SB-1 is only one of the sabino complex genes mapped, and the roaning seen on some sabinos isn't just sb-1. Also, the bit about pink skin is a bit confusing;horses almost always have pink skin under markings, and not under the rest of their hair coat.  The sabinos with roaning do not have pink skin under the roaned sections, just under white spots and lacy white spots.   Montanabw(talk) 03:34, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Parking SB-1 section

message: The caption to the photo says it is of a Red Roan sometimes called a Bay Roan. The text says these are different. The text suggests the photo is of a Bay Roan, not a Red Roan. 83.244.221.116 (talk) 13:46, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the article Roan (horse): "Red roan used to include both chestnut and bay roans. In 1999, the American Paint Horse Association changed its coat color descriptions: roans with a chestnut background coat are registered "red roan", while "bay roan" is its own category." William Avery (talk) 20:16, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads up, we'll fix that. Montanabw(talk) 00:16, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction between photo and text 
Talk:Gleicheniales

message: Wikipedia is not a crystal ball - unless sources are cited that say ferns perhaps may span two classes, that information isn't encyclopedic. Ryan Prior 20:22, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
:They do as it seems, though ranking them as classes is overkill. Source provided and statement removed. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 01:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:2–3–4 tree

message: I'm planning to expand the article to include a walkthough of all the 2-3-4 tree operations, a la red-black tree. I'll put the draft-in-progress below for comment. —Ghakko 13:41, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draft 

message: === Lookup ===
To find an element, we look for it in the root; if it's not there, we descend into the child whose interval the element is in and repeat.  If we encounter an empty child, the element is not present in the tree.
=== Insertion ===
Don't mean to be harsh, but this isn't a 2-3-4-tree. Over Christmas I will have a go at improving this.
* Split 4-nodes on way down (splitting root node heightens tree by one).
You don't do this, instead you put the middle element into the node above and point it to the other two elements and 4 children of this node. Only the root node can add a level like this.
** 
* Insertion is at leaf.
** 2-node leaf insertion (2 cases).
***  
** 3-node leaf insertion (3 cases).
***   
** 4-node leaf insertion (4 cases).
You can never actually insert at a 4-node, because it would have been split by the node before. This is trivally wrong as it generates 5-nodes.
***    
131.111.8.104 03:40, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operations 

message: Don't mean to be harsh, but this isn't a 2-3-4-tree. Over Christmas I will have a go at improving this.
* Split 4-nodes on way down (splitting root node heightens tree by one).
You don't do this, instead you put the middle element into the node above and point it to the other two elements and 4 children of this node. Only the root node can add a level like this.
** 
* Insertion is at leaf.
** 2-node leaf insertion (2 cases).
***  
** 3-node leaf insertion (3 cases).
***   
** 4-node leaf insertion (4 cases).
You can never actually insert at a 4-node, because it would have been split by the node before. This is trivally wrong as it generates 5-nodes.
***    
131.111.8.104 03:40, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insertion 

message: The height of a 2-3-4 tree with n \,\! elements is O(\log {n}) \,\!. 
* Worst case is a tree of 2-nodes. 
* Suppose the height of the tree is h \,\!.
* n \geq 1 + 2 + \ldots + 2^{h - 1}
* n \geq 2^{h} - 1
* \log_2({n + 1}) \geq h
* Best case is a tree of 4-nodes: O(\log_4{n}) = \frac{1}2\ O(\log {n}) \,\!.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.196.239.127 (talk) 12:57, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Analysis 

message: I was thinking of writing an implementation of a 2-3-4 tree using the object-oriented design pattern. I was considering Python/Java, do any of you think that would be a useful thing to include in this article? —Programmerer 19:12, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Implementation 

message: The link to "2–3–4 Trees: A Visual Introduction, 2017" seems to be dead.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.179.246.152 (talk) 05:52, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:Country rap

message: Hey, Cowboy Troy's not  the only one mixing country with rap! I added a few examples, I have a few others but it gets a bit murky where to draw the line between country rap and talking blues country. See eminemmylou.com Isn't Nelly part country rap, look at some of his lyrics and hooks
--archola June 1, 2005 3:57 pm CDT
:Eminemmylou? Sounds like a joke...
::Well, it's a jokey stage name for a real Brithop artist from Brighton, Sussex, England, UK. She's currently with Latest Records. She used her real name before adding Country to the mix (can't remember what that name was, though. Archola Sept 1, 2005 11:11 AM CDT
The Cadillac Zack mention section seems a bit long for one artist in the genre, a bit non-encyclopedic, and, lastly, not put together in sentence very well.
216.250.6.63 01:39, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Eminemmylou is also known as Angi Mariani, a country songwriter who does country songs with rap and hip hop, and also does Eminem songs with a banjo such as The Way I Am, and has battle-raps with 50 Cent in the style of a hip hop Kitty Wells, with her feisty response rap, L.I.M.P. Her album Muthabanjo includes When Gram met Eminem, and a cover of Gloomy Sunday, the banned "suicide song" which she has turned into an anti-suicide anthem, with rapper, Legs MC. She says she's going to put country rap on the map.  thelatest Sept 29, 2005 5:40 pm CDT
The Cadillac Zack mention section seems a bit long for one artist in the genre, a bit non-encyclopedic, and, lastly, not put together in sentence very well.
216.250.6.63 01:40, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Pimp C from UGK first originated "Country Rap"... I found it pretty weird to hear that it came from somewhere else when he had been boasting that style since '92...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.250.78 (talk) 20:19, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pimp C 

message: Do the somewhat earlier Travis Shredd and the Good Ol' Homeboys merit mention here, perhaps as a precursor? - Jmabel | Talk 20:25, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Travis Shredd 

message: The redirect Countrycore has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  FMSky (talk) 01:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Countrycore]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Geert Adriaans Boomgaard

message: Results from http://www.genlias.nl (civil records)
Source 	Civil register - Marriage (Groom)
Archive location 	Groninger Archieven  
General	Municipality: Groningen
Type of record: Huwelijksakte
Record number: 28
Registration date: 04-03-1818
Bridegroom	Geert Adriaans Boomgaard
Date of birth: 23-09-1788
Place of birth: Groningen
Bride	Stijntje Bus
Date of birth: 05-03-1797
Place of birth: Oude Pekela
Father bridegroom	Adriaan Jacobs Boomgaard
Mother bridegroom	Geesje Geerts
Father bride	Jan Jurjens Bus
Mother bride	Anna Huisinga
Additional information	beroep bruidegom: schipper; beroep vader bruid: 
molenaar; bruidegom 29 jaar; bruid 20 jaar
Source 	Civil register - Marriage (Groom)
Archive location 	Groninger Archieven  
General	Municipality: Groningen
Type of record: Huwelijksakte
Record number: 31
Registration date: 17-03-1831
Bridegroom	Geert Adriaans Boomgaard
Date of birth: 23-09-1788
Place of birth: Groningen
Bride	Grietje Abels Jonker
Date of birth: 19-05-1788
Place of birth: Sappemeer
Father bridegroom	Adriaan Jacobs Boomgaard
Mother bridegroom	Geesje Geerts
Father bride	Abel Warners Jonker
Mother bride	Anna Maathuis
Additional information	beroep bruidegom: schipper; beroep bruid: dienstmeid; beroep vader bruidegom.: schipper; beroep vader bruid: scheepstimmerman; bruidegom 42 jaar; bruid 37 jaar; weduwnaar van Styntje Bus
So he was married twice, and both records state his date of birth on September 23, 1788 (not September 21, 1788)
Taka 21:04, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Despite the above entries in marriage records,detailed investigation of his lifespan has ascertained that he was BORN September 21st and BAPTIZED September 23rd,according to Gert Jan Kuiper,my correspondent on Netherlands supercentenarians and a longstanding authority on that topic.--Louis Epstein/le@put.com/12.144.5.2 22:42, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course it is possible that such old civil records hold incorrect information. Is there a way to get a reference to the research by Gert Jan Kuiper, a website or a publication maybe? Taka 12:20, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Who is Pierre Darcourt?  There is no other listing for him on Wikipedia and even a Google search didn't tell me anything. 211.58.227.144 05:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pierre Darcourt?
Template talk:Saint-stub

message: There is a saint-stub. 
It is used in many countries. 
And as you know the Christianity was divided about 1000 year ago. 
And the saint-stub uses the icon of Francisk from Assisi. 
But he is not a saint for some Churches. 
Therefore we need (in that stub) to use a saint that are accepted in all Churches. 
Then he must be from time before 1000. 
I suggest the Saint George. 
What do you say?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.25.120.81 (talk) 15:05, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I see your point. Personally I'd prefer the image that the portal, navbox, and (in a slightly different version) the  project template use, namely: :File:Gloriole blur.svg. That would be consistent, visually appealing (unlike rendering any face at a very low resolution), and neural (all major Churches use halos to represent saints, and a halo alone represents no particular saint; the visual tradition dates back to early Christianity). The lead image of the article Saint also features halos. That association is strong. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:44, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  This stub does need another image (icon)
Talk:The City Waites

message: Looks like a copy vio - appears to be the blurb from a CD sleeve.
:OK you got me fair and square. I copied it from the blurb on "Musicians of Grope Lane". Don't you just hate perfectionists! I don't know, you buy an obscure album, it goes out of print for several years, you then gather together the best discography of that groups that exists anywhere on the web, you put it into Wiki, and then you get accused, very prominently, of copy vio. Grumble, grumble. I hope you approve of my improvement.Ogg 09:41, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Original postings follow

message: :Why? As far as I can see it has neutral language and the copyright issue has (apparently) been rectified. In any case is a copyright violation an NPOV issue? --Silver149 6 July 2005 08:15 (UTC)
::I am removing it. I know nothing about the band itself and whether or not there are any controversities about it, but there is no POV in the article. — Kkmº 20:58, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV sticker 

message: To describe Lucie Skeaping as "For an academic... stunningly glamorous" is rather a back-handed compliment to Lucie Skeaping and an implied slur on all the male and female glamour on show in academe. Nor am I sure it's right to refer to her as an "academic". She's certainly a music scholar, and seemingly a good one but she doesn't work in academia which I think is the only sensible definition of an "academic". Since this sentence tells us nothing except that she's very fanciable - which is not relevant within the context of the  article - I suggest you remove it. Your link to the City Waites website will enable people to view the lovely Lucie for themselves.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.29.104 (talk) 11:00, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fortunately, academia and performance in Early Music are integrally linked in the Historically Informed Performance movement, by the Schola Cantorum Basiliensis, internationally, and the Academy of Ancient Music at Cambridge, nationally. The BBC Radio 3's Early Music Show is the main outreach of the movement in the UK, and Lucie is one of its leading presenters. Lucie heself is on the faculty of London's independent Gresham College, and her husband Roddy is a fully-fledged academic: the premises of your hypothesis are incorrect. The essence of the work done these last fifty years in this domain has taken the academic onto the performance stage in a very active dialogue, and the fact you don't know that the work was started by David Munrow and Roddy Skeaping, who went on to found the City Waites with Lucie and Dr Graham Wells, Head of the Music Department at Sotheby's before becoming head of the Galpin Society, really rather disqualifies you from comment. That rather sums up a fairly heaviweight academic in the real world, in my book (and I work in academia). And what she looks like and how she dresses is entirely her own business and nothing to do with you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.218.129.144 (talk) 16:08, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Academic glamour
Talk:Neighborhoods of Minneapolis

message: It might be noted that the graphic accompanying the article is outdated. Phillips has since been split into different neighorhoods: Ventura Village, West Phillips, East Phillips, and Midtown. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.73.52.36 (talk) 23:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phillips Map 

message: I have created two alternatives to the current Minneapolis neighborhood template. They are available for viewing on the template talk page. The two templates categorize each neighborhood according to what community it is located in. Currently, the communities and neighborhoods are listed separate from each other. Eco84 | Talk 00:20, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *I like alternative #1 best.  Good job.--Appraiser 11:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposals for template change

message: Since Neighborhoods of Minneapolis is mostly about official neighborhoods, I've reworked the commercial districts section into "unofficial neighborhoods." Most of the content is still there, just reframed to note the different ways unofficial neighborhoods relate to the official neighborhoods. I'd suggest that further discussion of commercial districts go to the general Minneapolis, Minnesota article.--Natcase 03:25, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have Javascript enabled, on the History page there are two columns which you can use to select two versions, then press the button to view the differences between those two versions.  Just as if there had been a single large edit.  -- SEWilco (talk) 04:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unofficial designations

message: I've tagged the image :Image:Mpls.png as having no source information.  I'm pretty sure the image is from the city's website  and if so would not be a work of the federal government. Someone might want to create a free map of Minneapolis to replace it. Eóin (talk) 22:43, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've created a replacement, but it's not the greatest. Seeing how :Image:Mpls.png has been deleted, it'll have to do until someone can make a better one. Eco84 | Talk 00:02, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map of neighborhoods  

message: Anyone working on articles about individual Minneapolis neighborhoods might benefit from the images taken by Max Hailperin, whose blog All of Minneapolis documents his journey walking Minneapolis neighborhood by neighborhood, in alphabetical order. Images are licensed CC-BY-SA-4.0 and include both neighborhood landmarks (churches, libraries, etc.) and less notable buildings/locations (community gardens, walking paths, houses, stores). The project is, as of January 2019, in the Ls, so about half of neighborhoods have been walked (and photographed) so far. If you do upload them over on Commons, make sure to tag the pages with  so a reviewer can confirm their external license (example here). Best —Collint c 15:09, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useful images
Talk:Q. Are We Not Men? A: We Are Devo!

message: *Very strong support for move to an article title with a question mark after "Men". This page-move has been one of the ones haunting my dreams for months. I think about it constantly: will it ever be moved? Should it? Of course it should. Why hasn't it already? It's even given as an example of the ideal way an article should be named when "Q:", for example, is impossible. It has seized my brain like a fever. Let the madness finally end that I may find peace; please, for the love of god, move the article. -Silence 22:48, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: What about moving it to Q. Are We Not Men? A. We Are Devo! with periods instead of colons? --Jordan Elder  talk 04:14, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move idea 

message: Track listing should reflect album as originally issued (i.e., LP vinyl/cassette) per WP:ALBUM: "Albums originally released primarily on vinyl or cassette should similarly list the tracks of each side separately under sub-headings named "Side one" and "Side two". "Cloonmore (talk) 18:21, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You wouldn't believe how much flak I get when I do it the "correct" way (side one-side two) for certain albums made before 1987, even when I point people to that paragraph. The operative part is "should similarly list" rather than "should always, except under expressly-stated conditions, have listed" . No arguments from me. Fantailfan (talk) 01:17, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: LP sides

message: This article reads like crap. Cloonmore (talk) 06:12, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there's always Wikipedia:Civility, but I've tried to clean it up. That list stuff in the middle is all very trivial and cites imdb, which needs to be cleaned up and inputted with more useful information. I'm not the best and writing, but I'm trying my best. If you see something you dislike about the article grammar or syntax wise, why not help clean it up? Cheers. Andrzejbanas (talk) 06:39, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

text: There we go! Thanks for cleaning up the page! I think we should add information about themes and style of the music in the album before submitting it for a GA. Thanks Cloonmore! Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:23, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: GA?Cloonmore (talk) 03:16, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: GA! Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:36, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Syntax? Grammar?

message: Wikipedia now has Template:DISPLAYTITLE to fix titles like this. I'm not sure how to do it. Could someone who is confident enough fix it? -Taras (talk) 00:33, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: For posterity, the reason this is not done is because the page titles are not equivalent: Warning: Display title "Q: Are We Not Men? A: We Are Devo!" was ignored since it is not equivalent to the page's actual title. — cBuckley (Talk • Contribs) 15:11, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  DISPLAYTITLE to fix display title 
Talk:New Traditionalists

message: This doesn't make sense. How can New Traditionalists be "markedly different" from Freedom of Choice, when that's classed as being different from its respective previous album for the exact same reason?
"Freedom of Choice is an album by New Wave musicians Devo, released in 1980 (see 1980 in music). It was highly unlike Devo's previous albums, full of synthesizers and outright synth pop elements. The album is considered to be quintessentially Eighties."
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_Choice
New Traditionalists is a 1981 album by the New Wave rock band Devo. It features the minor hits "Through Being Cool", and "Beautiful World". The sound was markedly different from the previous album Freedom of Choice, with synthesizers moved to the forefront, and guitars more subdued . The lyrics are extremely dark and vitriolic, as well.
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Traditionalists
--86.130.116.148 08:43, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Amazing how few changes can make an article much better. Thanks, cat. --Fantailfan 12:18, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Markedly different" sounds? 

message: As noted in interviews, Gerry Casale was forced to edit some of DEVO’s music videos, to get MTV airplay. But, for the “New Traditionalists” Tour, it apparently was “anything goes”. Specifically the “Love Without Anger” video, only released in edited form to home media, had a couple of changes. For example; the scene with the innocent DEVO choir boys, singing from a book titled “Love Without Anger”, there was a reverse shot to show the contents of the book - two toy dolls having sex. DEVO, it seems, wanted concert goers to get the real truth about de-evolution! 75.106.32.81 (talk) 22:24, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate Music Videos Used In Tour.
Talk:List of ancient Egyptian sites

message: What is middle egypt?
Egypt was only split into Upper & Lower.
: That is correct, however from about Al Fayyum to Asyut (200-300Km) you have an area that is not really part of neither Upper or Lower egypt. The term is in use and some even use it all the way down to Sohag/Abydos. Just tab in "Middle egypt" in google and you will see it is in use. And beside that it makes such a large list more managable. Twthmoses 22:42, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Middle Egypt?

message: This list could do with an brush up. It could be ordered by nome ? Markh 17:53, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Order

message: This isn’t my area of expertise, but can I suggest (if it isn’t too difficult) that we have some more detail about the sites listed here? 
For example; what it was, where it was (co-ordinates, nome, present name), and in what period (roughly) it existed. 
And (to get over the difficulties of what order to put things in) have it in  sortable table form? Moonraker12 (talk) 16:23, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  List, again
Talk:Mikhail Khodorkhovsky

message: I do belive that an article on this person is warented, the tone and content of the article is sigificantly slanted and biased towards an anti-goverement stance, and needs to be singificantly rewritten. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 21:59, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, article is alternative spelling for Mikhail Khodorkovsky--Boothy443 | comhrÚ 22:02, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: POV