Talk:Queensmount Public School

message: :Image:Queensmount logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Queensmount logo.gif

message: *(Copied by me from User talk:Mr.Deathhawk -- Though is would be useful to explain why I did what I did.  It's a response to this edit on my talk page.)
It's decidedly not fixed after your changes.
* The www in the url that your restored in the infobox is invalid -- the URL doesn't work with that.
* "Viceprincipal" is misspelled in the infobox -- you restored the misspelling.
* Principal and vice-principal are already in the infobox, does not need to be in the opening paragraph
* In general, spelling and grammar are atrocious.
* The rivalry with nearby school might be mentioned farther down.
* "Wrestling Streak" -- any references??  Does anybody care?
* The fact that the students can go to nearby restaurants isn't significant for a global encyclopedia, certainly doesn't belong in an introductory paragraph, and is unsourced as well.
* I do hope that Mrs. Robertson gets better, but that's local news, not part of an encyclopedia entry.
* Members of a band at most schools get to play instruments -- the list of particular instruments isn't significant.
* Nothing is actually said about the Music and Arts program except that Mrs. Robertson is sick and students can play instruments.  What are the actual music programs?  What about the arts?
* Details of the fitness test are insignificant, the rest of the sports section is either opinion or unsourced.
* Why are the staff listed as notable, notable?  Maybe the principal and vice-principal, but they're already mentioned in the infobox.
* Trivia is unsourced.
That's why I'm going to redelete all of that.  Please consider what makes an article encyclopedic -- please take a look at Wikipedia:Article development and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not -- they should be helpful.  -- ArglebargleIV 18:10, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Response from [[User:ArglebargleIV]]