Talk:Carte Blanche (TV series)

message: This show is no doubt very good and very important; however, such gems as
:"In a continent of 53 countries and thousands of cultures and languages, it is vital that there is a unifying force."
:"With live web chats, interactive guides, polls and discussion forums, viewers are brought closer to the stories that affect them."
the article gets a little mushy and opinionated. --Lionelbrits 04:28, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I've trimmed a lot of the mushy stuff. It's a single-editor article and I've put  tags next to a number of statements that need citations. These are mostly about awards, stats and viewership. The awards should be easy to cite, and hopefully there's a source for viewership figures. Some of the stats might be available on a brag page on the Carte Blanche website and if not, they shouldn't be published here. I'm not sure if all the stats are notable either. Zaian 22:32, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

text: The original author works for Carte Blanche--Magnito 10:35, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
Carte Blanche → Carte Blanche (show) — Carte Blanche should probably redirect to the disambiguation page Carte blanche. Korg (talk) 16:34, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
#Support.  Seems logical, especially with several uses for this spelling.  Vegaswikian 02:13, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 18:42, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
#Support.  Seems logical, especially with several uses for this spelling.  Vegaswikian 02:13, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 18:42, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: #Support.  Seems logical, especially with several uses for this spelling.  Vegaswikian 02:13, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move

message: #
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 18:42, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in opposition to the move

message: Any specific reason why all the references are inline, and not using the standard  format? I was tempted to change them all, but wasn't sure if there was a specific reason the original editors didn't go with that format. --GrahamDo (talk) 14:41, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inline References?