Talk:Canadian Tire Financial Services

message: I believe this page to be biased and advertises the Tire Financial Services, though I am not sure whether a consensus of people agree, so I called for this review.
Danielspencer91 18:18, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I've heard criticism of the service before. If we could have a criticism section, it would make probably it more neutral.  16:34, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased 

message: :Image:Canadian Tire Financial Services logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Canadian Tire Financial Services logo.gif

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Canadian Tire Bank. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110826151711/https://www.ctfs.com/AboutUs/ to https://www.ctfs.com/AboutUs/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:52, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Thanks to  for not removing the reference to Midland Shoppers Credit, Limited, in this article. I think it's an important development in the corporate history. I did a few Google searches to try and find another source, but I think if we can try and leave in those corporate developments and just add rationale to the citation needed tags as BarrelProof and I have done, that'd be great.
Perhaps we could add a to-do list to this Talk page with things needing attention? I'd look up how to add a to-do list, but figured BarrelProof probably knows how. Doug Mehus (talk) 15:20, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there is anything wrong with having  tags in the article that identify facts that are stated but not supported by references. Generally speaking, we should not be presenting information to readers unless we are able to determine that the information is correct, and I think it is desirable for readers to be able to see which facts are lacking verification. —BarrelProof (talk) 15:36, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, I agree with you. To be clear, I had no issue with those tags...I just think we should be adding optional rationale to the tag so people can mouseover and see exactly what's missing and help out (as you did with your most recent edit and I did as well). Doug Mehus (talk) 15:44, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Good. I certainly support that. —BarrelProof (talk) 16:11, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Midland Shoppers Credit, Limited