Talk:Clarence Gamble

message: I am still busy with the details, will fill in more info today.
Killerdark 16:52, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I came into this article with the notion that this man was a fan of eugenics who immorally conducted medical experiments involving birth control in Puerto Rico and Los Angeles with respect to race and was involved in a "Negro Project."  However, this article basically defines the man as a saint.  He crusaded for justice in his fields of birth control, and there are a great many references to his all-around good nature (who cares if his mother told him it's about doing the right thing and not taking credit?).
I am well aware that my point of view is biased, but the current state of the article not only is biased but leaves out some significant biographical information about Gamble. ~ magbatz 14:18, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:13, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Clarence Gamble. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111110134413/http://extras.journalnow.com/againsttheirwill/parts/three/story1.html to http://extras.journalnow.com/againsttheirwill/parts/three/story1.html
*Added  tag to http://www.northcarolinahistory.org/commentary/315/entry
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:31, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Clarence Gamble. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051221233905/http://www.pathfind.org/site/PageServer?pagename=About_Us_History to http://www.pathfind.org/site/PageServer?pagename=About_Us_History
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: We should not be referring to him as "Clarance" or as "Dr. Gable". Almost all references should be "Gamble". Also we should not use Dr. + name for his associates. In most cases we do not even need Dr. on first mention. Edna McKinnon should be refered to as McKinnion nor Edna on mentions after the first. We also do not need so much coatracking of unrelated material.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:07, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horribly written article