lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chinese ironclad Dingyuan

message: I came across this article when cleaning up "German gold mark". And I found this page say "In 1881, ..., 1.7 million taels of silver (6.2 million German gold mark)". I know that at least one of the two numbers are wrong.
Around that time, currency exchange rate did not float much. And it's usually proportional to the pure content of precious metal in the silver/gold coins. And I am certain of the following facts
# 1 Chinese yuan = 0.72 tael = 26.4 ~ 27 grams of 900‰ silver. Taking the average of the two, that means 1 yuan = 24.03 gram of pure silver.
# 1 gold mark = 5 grams of pure silver.
So 1.7 million taels
= (1.7 million / 0.72) yuan
= (1.7 million / 0.72 * 24.03) grams of silver
= (1.7 million / 0.72 * 24.03 / 5) German gold mark
≈ 11.35 million German gold mark
--Chochopk 04:58, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numeric accuracy 
Talk:Operation Nekka

message: I favor consloidating this article with the defense of the Great Wall artilce.  Operation Nekka should provide the network for the whole, with the battle of Rehe and the Defense of the Great wall within it. 
Asiaticus 18:50, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know much about this topic, but I proposed the merge because of this sentence here: "Known to the Chinese as the Defense of the Great Wall." This sentence suggests that the two are the same thing...if they're not, some things need to be clarified. _dk 01:33, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Order of Blue Sky and White Sun

message: doesn't 青天白日 means clear sky white sun? not blue sky white sun?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.12.227 (talk) 12:25, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I know I'm 2 years late, but 青 ≠ 晴 ≠ 清. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 12:57, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  青天白日
Talk:Saturday Night Slam Masters

message: Does Tetsuo Hara owns partial copyrights of the series? It seems odd that Capcom never had any of the characters introduced in this series cameoed in other games? I've seen characters from more obscure games than this referenced in games like Namco X Capcom and Card Fighters Clash. Not to mention they didn't even bother including the games in any of the compilations. Jonny2x4 (talk) 02:51, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Remember that Strider is partially licensed from the character's designer, Moto Kikaku.  If you play Marvel vs. Capcom for example, you'll see that Moto Kikaku's name is always in the credits at the beginning.  I strongly suspect that you are correct and Capcom have been unable to keep the license to use Tetsuo Hara's character designs in further games although I don't have any evidence.  I would have loved to have seen some of the Slam Master's characters in modern fighting games.  El Fuerte should have been replaced by El Stinger/Stingray in my opinion. 95.148.8.39 (talk) 14:08, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyrights? 

message: appearances are rather similar, trademark move is the same (rapid-fire "bladed" punches), and, if classic american pro wrestling is to be believed, the majority of pro wrestlers w/a "foreigner" gimmick are usually american in real life. also, capcom has been known to include characters from other series in street fighters, so it's not a completely out-there suggestion. --173.103.148.70 (talk) 06:07, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  sf3 alex = alexei zalazov?
Talk:The Simpsons Wrestling

message: Hi all, at the end of the first section of the page, we have this sentence;
"The game was widely panned by critics, and has since been considered by many to be one of the worst video games of all time, though the audio track was praised."
I don't have much knowledge about the game, and most of the review links appear to be dead. Is anyone knowledgeable enough to provide clarity on what "audio track" means in this context? Soundtrack, voiceovers, or just "sound" would be more descriptive and more conventional terms to use. "Audio track" lacks clarity and is not a conventionally used bit of video game terminology.
Thanks! 104.221.54.89 (talk) 23:46, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of "audio track" at the top of the page
Talk:Mark Martin (cartoonist)

message: I just want to see if there is evidance that he is a notable comic artist.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Team6and7 (talk • contribs) 14:37, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  is he notable enough for wiki 
Talk:Tecmo World Wrestling

message: The following note appears in the article: All information in this section, other than "Other Notes," comes from the game.   Does that mean that, as I suspect, the "Other Notes" section is entirely OR?  162 etc. (talk) 03:58, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it.  WP:PROVEIT 162 etc. (talk) 07:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Wrestlers" section
Talk:Virtual Pro Wrestling 64

message: Several edits were made on February 14th, 2014 by the IP address 67.247.242.31. I reverted their changes as best I can, I'm not too good with wikipedia and I probably could have hit a button to just undo all the vandalism, but it's gone now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.212.127.94 (talk) 09:20, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism fixed.
Talk:WWE Crush Hour

message: Question: Why is my revision regarding Junkyard Dog continually being reverted? For 1) I can't find anything that states he's even a character in the game. 2)If he is, I find it hard to believe that his vehicle would be a station wagon. I say not impossible to believe because WWE does do some whack things, but c'mon, a black man driving a station wagon huh? That's headin' down the racism path imo. Anyone have any hard facts on this issue? Thanks. InFlamester20 (talk) 22:45, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Junkyard Dog's station wagon
Talk:WWE Raw 2

message: "Another flaw during gameplay is while playing Royal Rumble, you can exit the ring on your own terms and still not be eliminated."  - As long as your'e not over the tope rope it's not an elimination..... SUCKA!!! 83.73.234.148 18:42, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a flaw 

message: How come it says Jeff Hardy is in the game. He is not in it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.236.129.214 (talk) 16:55, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And it should not speciffcally say he's not in it, that's like saying "A.J. Styles is not in this game, because he works with TNA" it's irrelavent. any fan of wrestling knows that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by L0W3R1D3R (talk • contribs) 14:38, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jeff Hardy 

message: isnt eddie guerrer oin this game?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.143.42.195 (talk) 11:30, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  eddie guerrero 

message: Why You can't edit superstars voices I wanted to know.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.120.121.249 (talk) 02:08, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voices 

message: A member had deleted all the previous content on the article, replacing it with just two lines of content. This is ridiclous as it was a pretty big article and now it's basically nothing. Muur (talk) 20:36, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it possible to restore any of the previous information to this article?
Talk:The X

message: The x → The X — This is a disambiguation page, all items on which relate to the phrase 'The X', none of which relate to the phrase 'The x'.
===Survey===
:Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
* Support per nom. David Kernow 19:24, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) 11:58, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
* Support per nom. David Kernow 19:24, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) 11:58, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:WWF Attitude

message: Does anyone now what the date was when this game was released. --TG 50 21:57, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date 

message: I think a screenshot of the game may help the article.--Someguyudontknow 07:36, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenshot? 

message: Jeff talks about it in his recent IGN interview - http://sports.ign.com/articles/842/842317p2.html
*"Didn't you do motion capture for WWE Attitude?
*Jeff: Yeah! Back in the attitude era, Matt and I put the suits on them with all the little balls on them, it was brutal, man! We did well over 1000 moves, and if one of those things come off, you had to do them all over again. I don't know if that's still around, or how they make games today, but yeah, that was brutal." Ladder4321 (talk) 04:42, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matt & Jeff Hardy did the mokap work for the game 

message: I have no idea what the hell this section is talking about or who wrote it, but clearly it makes no sense, and is just some random kid listing some CAW's he created in his game and wants to include as if they were actual wrestlers in the game.  This section should be removed.  AndarielHalo (talk) 16:46, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Custom Wrestlers section 

message: I did somewhat of a rewrite of the article for grammatical & spelling errors as well as rewording it flow better (IMHO).  Hope that is ok.  Also broke up the development because, again IMHO, I think it flows & sounds better.  GZadmin 01:15, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:WWF In Your House (video game)

message: The article is currently titled:
*WWF in Your House
yet the bold intro spells it like:
*WWF In Your House
The difference being the capitalization of the "i". Furthermore, if we look at the logo, it should actually be spelled like:
*WWF iN your House
Should this be changed? Ranze (talk) 18:40, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not. Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks: "When deciding how to format a trademark, editors should choose among styles already in use (not invent new ones) and choose the style that most closely resembles standard English, regardless of the preference of the trademark owner." In Your House follows this convention. So, the article should really be at "WWF In Your House." --Jtalledo (talk) 19:00, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stylization 
Talk:WWF King of the Ring (video game)

message: Having difficulty finding primary sources for reviews for this game. Giant Bomb has no references for it's Critical Reviews section; so would like something more concrete. Lee Vilenski (talk) 20:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Critical Reception
Talk:WWF War Zone

message: Could we mention fun with ahmed?  Go on YouTube and search it.    99.253.190.185 (talk) 14:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope - it's funny, but that's about it. Definitely not worth mentioning. --Jtalledo (talk) 22:09, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fun With Ahmed 

message: This page needs a list of playable wrestlers, I think.  I'd add it now but I'm far too tired.  If I remember in the morning I'll go about putting the list together. Aaaantoine (talk) 06:07, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As per WP:PW, there's no consensus on adding lists of wrestlers to articles about wrestling video games. --Jtalledo (talk) 10:32, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  In that case, where on Wikipedia might find out, or write down, whether Ahmed Johnson makes an appearance in this game, like I was trying to find out last night? Aaaantoine (talk) 21:17, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Nowhere. Try Wikia. --Jtalledo (talk) 01:30, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Playable Wrestlers
Talk:WWF WrestleFest

message: There was an actual WWF event called Wrestlefest, that was "straight to video". (see Amazon for evidence) --Jameboy (talk) 23:09, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Event

message: Article should mention that the new version, WWE Wrestlefest, was cancelled when THQ went under . BZ11110 (talk) 00:21, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Version Cancelled
Talk:WWF WrestleMania 2000 (video game)

message: Removed Booker-T form game roster, he wasn't even on the WWF payroll at the time.  Remember he was still in WCW during these years, he didn't even show up in the WWE video games until Xbox had their RAW series.
~Chaz  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.190.56.195 (talk) 23:33, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:WWF SmackDown! Just Bring It

message: This article is not NPOV at all. HorseApples 02:27, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Point of View

message: I can get why you'd not want trivia on an encyclopedic page, but by removing it you've defeated all or much of the purpose of even having this article, seeing as it gives virtually no information that couldn't be dug up from a rapid search on any random game site. I thought Wikipedia was about information? --Kaizer13 18:01, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Information, not random cruft. See WP:TRIVIA.-- bulletproof 3:16 02:22, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So you won't even bother to extrapolate, and instead point people in direction of "accepted guidelines"? Heh. --Kaizer13 15:01, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia? 

message: Insert formula here
HBK wasn't on this game,but his moveste were  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.86.230.17 (talk) 22:14, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  HBK 

message: Eddie Guerrero IS in this game. He has Black tights with gold and blue designs, his own music/titantron, named moves (Eddie roll up) and specific lines in commentary for him (Eddie Guerrero looked great...Last night!). I have no form of gameshark, I haven't unlocked him and my memory card has no JBI info on it. I have the "Sony Greatest hits" edition, but I doubt that's the reason I have Eddie. You want proof? Gamespot has him on their roster page. Not concrete evidence but the best proof I can offer you on the internet. However, I encourage you to play the game and look at the roster. I am sure he'll be there. Tobythegreat (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 14:19, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep. Another instance of people who haven't played the games screwing up. --Kaizer13 (talk) 18:28, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eddie Guerrero 

message: How many wrestlers are in this Game? Which wrestlers are in this Game?
i believe those infos would improve this article.  GBK
GBK666 (talk) 15:32, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, Wikipedia just do not like including useful information that wouldn't make their articles completely redundant most of the time. It's life son. --Kaizer13 (talk) 17:34, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Informations
Talk:WWE SmackDown! Here Comes the Pain

message: This article really needs some clean-up. HorseApples 02:37, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up

message: Can anyone confirm where Linda McMahon and Jonathan Coachman are seen in the game? I have the game, and I've seen all of the others (Ross, Lawler, Cole, Tazz, Chioda, & Hebner), except for those 2. Also, can you talk to them backstage, or can they only be seen in a Season Mode cutscene? I've tried Googling this, but no website in the results mentions those 2 as characters that are in the game (but are not playable).—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.244.144.174 (talk) 00:13, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Jonathan Coachman can be seen asking you something backstage in season mode during a storyline, but i've never seen Linda Mcmahon in the game any were.--Adam Penale (talk) 19:55, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-Playable Characters 

message: whats the difference between raw 1 and raw 2 and smackdown 1 and smackdown 2?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.129.245.46 (talk) 17:26, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 82,129,245,46 talk 17 114.5.212.185 (talk) 07:12, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Raw and Smackdown Arenas

message: what wrestlers serve as base models in the create-a-wrestler section?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.235.162.12 (talk) 04:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CAW 

message: 'Batista' currently links to the wrong article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.239.48.164 (talk) 22:39, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Heads Up

message: Aabhi Oadam 2401:4900:52FC:2C6E:A45A:420C:420F:973F (talk) 08:30, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aartu 

message: I am a soldier and my favourite collector is undertaker 103.75.225.94 (talk) 17:14, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please give my download in mobile 103.75.225.94 (talk) 17:14, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:Charlie Biddle

message: Biddle joined the Army late in the war, and based on the references, it's unknown if his deployment to Burma was during the war or just after it. However, it would be interesting to determine if he had a role in the Ledo Road. See African Americans in the “Forgotten Theater” of World War II". Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 20:58, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: World War II service
Talk:Dark angel (poem)

message: This poem was written by Lionel Johnson. As an English assignment, I chose to explain and analyze this poem. I do not have any sources however, but the poem is indeed authentic. I do not believe it should be deleted. It can be verified by various texts, however I do not possess the text in which I received the poem, therefore I cannot make reference to it.
The reason I posted it for deletion is because it's in the wrong place. It should be in WikiSource. It is appreciated that you tried to expand Lionel Johnson's poetry, but it was the wrong method. Thank you, if you have comments please leave it on my talk page. Yanksox 01:24, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Gar-Field Senior High School

message: I have reverted the demographics section to what appears to be the last non-vandalism version. I attended this high school from 2006-2007 and the ethnic makeup was very evenly distributed. -Gulp Dratsum (talk) 20:05, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Demographics Section
Wikipedia talk:TheTrueSora's UBX Proposal

message: Please use this space to discuss issues related to the proposal itself. Please note that I have offered to do the programming required to make the Userbox: namespace usable, if non of the developers would like to do so. // The True Sora 01:37, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Is what this proposal proposes even legal by a "whatever-space" standard if there is one? Homestarmy 01:32, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know of one, but if there is one, I don't see why it would be. I have, by the way, volunteered to do the coding within the MediaWiki codebase to achieve this, if the actual developers don't wish to do so. // The True Sora 01:37, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Tony, like I said above, the MediaWiki software is open source- I could do the programming myself. // The True Sora 01:57, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because you could easily create a patch doesn't mean the devs would incorporate it into the main code. They're not going to add something that was developed for an isolated issue such as userboxes; it's bad software design. You could create an extension though, and if consensus supported it, they might enable it on en for us. ~MDD4696 19:07, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it won't get added if the developers don't want it. That said, has anyone really asked them? I've only seen second-hand statements at best. Jay Maynard 01:23, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Take a look at Wiktionary. They have a Portal: namespace, which is not in the default code- and from all the developers I've talked to, it'll take about 2 lines of code- hopefully, the developers won't mind that much. // The True Sora 01:53, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First question

message: *This proposal is head & shoulders above any other I've seen.  It doesn't leave the userboxes in Template: space as the inclusionists want, but it doesn't kill userbox templates wholesale, as the deletionists want.  Community & diversity are preserved, while article space is sanitized.  It comes closest to the middle ground, in my view.  Thanks, Sora!--Ssbohio 23:38, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Support

message: I assume this proposal allows POV userboxes? - • The Giant Puffin • 12:51, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course; if it didn't, it wouldn't exactly be a compromise, would it? // The True Sora 13:07, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Some folks in this debate seem to think "compromise" means "do it my way". Jay Maynard 13:10, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

text: It allows userboxes that express a point of view. As in, "this user thinks that [insert belief here]", or "this user is an [insert ideology here]", or something like that. Obviously there is a limit to what a user can say; as mentioned on the proposal page, a userbox that states "this user wants to kill all [insert group of people here]" would be eligible for deletion – Gurch 13:09, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Kusudama

message: Please don't merge this article! There is a significant difference between a Kusudama and Modular origami; they are historically distinct objects. A kusudama is much older, and is put together by stringing the units together with thread and needle, wheras modular origami usually employs the insertion of flaps into slits and pockets created by the folding process. Under modern terms, kusudamas would not be considered as origami by many due to the fact that they require the paper to be modified (other that folding it of course). Ahudson 01:39, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I have removed the merge tag from the article. the wub "?!" 11:54, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger?
Talk:Marine Corps Intelligence Activity

message: The seal of the MCIA can be found at http://www.military-graphics.com/MCIA.png
72.243.192.113 (talk) 07:33, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seal 

message: I am suggesting that Marine Corps Intelligence be merged into this article. They are both basically discussing the same thing. The other page has more info, (though some of it could be trimmed), while this page is basicallly a stub in size, but the article title is the proper name of the organization that is part of the United States Intelligence Community. The other article discusses what takes place within the agency described in this article. There really is no need for two articles, and the two pages together could make for a much better overall article. To keep the discussion in one place, please post your responses here, not there. Thanks - theWOLFchild 16:37, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge For our purposes, and in the interests of dealing with a discrete entity, best course is a merger. Buckshot06 (talk) 05:37, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Weapons company

message: The numbers don't add up, for example: 
* "Eight-man section headquarters, which includes a section leader, two ammunition men, and a fire direction center with two forward observers (FOs)" - that is only 5.
* "five-man mortar squads. Each mortar squad includes a squad leader, a gunner, assistant gunner, and three ammunition men" - that is 6.
And so on. Which is correct? LamontCranston (talk) 12:14, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  marine corp weapons company figures
Talk:Marine Forces Reserve

message: Wouldn't this be a major command and not a MAGTF? I'd think it would be similiar to calling HQMC a MAGTF because it is over ground, aviation, and support units. Besides, you won't see 4th MarDiv, 4th MAW, and 4th FSSG deploying together in one cohesive unit. Maybe elements of each organized into a MEU or the such, but that would be the MAGTF, not the entire MarForRes.Gelston 21:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm adding a comment that most enlistments in the reserves are 6x2, just based on my own experience. There are a couple guys who tell me they have 8x0 (yes, the full 8 years in the SMCR). I don't know if they're misreading their MOL or if they really got shafted. --Cuervo, not logged in, 76.212.167.62 05:58, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enlistment lengths