Talk:Rukmini

message: The actual birth place of Mata Rukmini is Kundil Nagar not Haridwar. Kindly don't give wrong information. 
Kindly read this article:
https://suryanaidus.wordpress.com/tag/the-king-of-kamrupa-saindhya-1250-1270ad-transferred-the-capital-kamrup-nagar-to-kamatapur-in-the-west-from-then-onwards/
http://karsewak.blogspot.in/2008/01/ancient-history-of-northeast-india.html?m=1
https://villageinfo.in/assam/tinsukia/sadiya/kundil-nagar.html
Swadipta (talk) 15:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Swadipta - As explained in my edit summary "Wordpress is a publishing platform for self-published material so is NOT a WP:RS".Blogs are also totally unacceptable, whilst your third "reference"  an "INDIAN VILLAGE DIRECTORY" entry, which gives the population, area etc. but has no mention of "birthplace" or "Rukmini" whatsoever.You need to find references in reliable independent sources, not a source related to the claim.  - Arjayay (talk) 15:12, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth Place of Mata Rukmini 

message: Then how does you add the birth place as Haridwar. Online Material isn't available in internet. People have been ignoring Assam and its 6 sisters from past and so no one come forward to write genuine facts of Assam . This is the land where Hari(Vishnu) and Har(Shiva) started fighting against each other(Sonitpur), Bhagadutta the king of Kamrupa(Assam) got participate in Kurushetra war, this is the birth place of Mahabali Ghototkach(son of Bhim) and Hirimba , this is the birthplace of Barubahan (son of Arjun). Kindly read history of Assam and along with Kamrup(Assam) Kindom. Then you have no doubt about it. Thank you sir. 
Regards, 
Swadipta Swadipta (talk) 15:50, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issue related to birth place of Rukmini 

message: Sriji, Laadli and Kishori is the name of Radha Rani not Rukmini. Why this page is showing wrong information and misleading people. Maiou (talk) 07:54, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong names 

message: there are actually so many other names of Rukmini goddess Rukmini RucirananaMadhav (talk) 13:03, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  etimology and nicknames 

message: regards ,
added few temples and images of the goddess . Pointn‬  Pointn (talk) 11:09, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding few temples and images related to godddess rukmini to make this article more informative 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: 2409:4060:E84:63E1:0:0:D1CA:1907 (talk) 11:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rukmini temple = iskon guwahati 

message: @Kridha Please note that while Rukmini may be venerated as a chief consort of Krishna in Warkari tradition, it is not the only tradition to do so.  It is also not the only tradition to venerate her at all, as different traditions of Vaishnavism do so as well. You have objected to both of these statements in the past. I have already substantiated my points, but for your benefit, will do so again:
Chief consort of Krishna
In the Anushasana Parva of the Mahabharata (chapter 14}, Rukmini is described to be the chief consort of Krishna. https://books.google.co.nz/books?id=C5zKrCIBmBwC&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PA161&dq=rukmini+chief+consort&hl=en&redir_esc=y#v=snippet&q=consort&f=false
In Malayali tradition, Rukmini is the chief consort of Krishna. The Krishna Charitam is a work by the famous Malayali poet, Kunjan Nambiar, and verse 12.16 clearly calls her his chief consort. https://books.google.co.nz/books?id=byTKAwAAQBAJ&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PT159&dq=rukmini+chief+consort&hl=en&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=rukmini%20chief%20consort&f=false
Presence in other Vaishnava traditions
Rukmini is revered in Gaudiya Vaishnavism. She is offered adulation in the Brihad Bhagavatamrita: https://archive.org/details/sribrhadbhagavat0000sana/page/240/mode/2up?q=rukmini
The goddess is also venerated in Sri Vaishnava tradition, where she is the consort most associated with Krishna: https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/The_Religious_Sects_of_the_Hindus/ZWcwAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=sri+vaishnava+rukmini&pg=PA21&printsec=frontcover
I hope that you can see that Rukmini is neither solely venerated in Warkari tradition, nor is she the chief consort of Krishna only in this tradition. 
Theologically, I understand that you believe that Radha is the only chief consort of Krishna, but as an incarnation of Lakshmi as well, so is Rukmini. Historically, Rukmini was associated with Krishna before Radha was, according to D.C. Sircar. There exists a real regional difference in the Radha/Rukmini chief veneration across India, and to favour only one side is not objective. 
In conclusion, Rukmini is the chief consort of Krishna in several regions of India and in several texts, and in various traditions beyond the Warkari tradition. She is affiliated to Vaishnavism, not just Warkari tradition. As someone who acts under good faith, please read this and get back to me with your opinion. Chronikhiles (talk) 04:41, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand your perspective, even if I disagree with your key argument. Yeah, we've reached a consensus where the wording of the article is concerned. Also, I was not judging your beliefs, I was merely making an inference for my inductive reasoning. I am sorry you were offended by that. I am glad we can move on. Chronikhiles (talk) 06:44, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rukmini is not exclusive to the Warkari tradition 

message: User:Chronikhiles, the iconography section is currently a poetic description of Rukmini's beauty from Bhagavata Purana, and not an encyclopedic description based on an iconographical treatise. You may compare the iconography as described in Bhumi_(goddess)#Etymology_and_iconography or Lakshmi#Symbolism_and_iconography. Suggest the current section be removed. Redtigerxyz  Talk  11:35, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Noted, @Redtigerxyz. I will modify the section with the provided comparative articles in mind. Chronikhiles (talk) 11:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iconography