Talk:Bleach (Nirvana album)

message: Well I agree the opening lines contain way to much information. I have actually just removed a line which was about two singles that were not even from this album. I also removed "Sliver" from the singles section in the box on the right hand side as this wasn't a single from this album. As for allmusic.com I think it has been mentioned in guidelines that this is a reliable website to use as a source although I don't know about, about.com. You mentioned the Finland chart position being included, well why not ? this album does not have many chart positions. As for Poland I don't think there was an albums chart back then and there certainly isn't an archive or book. I should also mention that although this album was released in 1989 it did not make the charts until it was re-released in 1992. mjgm84 (talk) 12:40, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has improved over the last couple of days but I think it really should include the track listing for the live CD that comes with the 2009 re-release. QuintusPetillius (talk) 13:18, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I re-added it.. Someone removed it per notability guidlines, however, that's a pretty popular issue of the album so I think it's notable. CrowzRSA 02:53, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening lines

message: 'The album was re-released outside of the US by Geffen records in 1992. It was well received by critics. The re-release debuted at number eighty-nine on the Billboard 200.'
What? It was released outside of the US, still it charted? How can it be possible? 85.217.47.47 (talk) 04:46, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  re-release 

message: I was in the middle of some edit changes when I got an edit conflict. I did a simple copy and paste as I didn't want to go through the changes bit by bit as the read out was rather confusing. The conflict edits will have been lost, so I'll now go through and try to restore them. SilkTork *YES! 09:13, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit conflict

message: currently redirects here, but I have proposed making that title a disambiguation page and moving the song's redirect to Big Cheese (song). Your comments would be welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 May 8#Big Cheese. Thryduulf (talk) 20:10, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big Cheese 

message: I would argue the inclusion of this category is not really appropriate for two reasons:
# Bleach was not a live album to begin with, and
# even in its expanded edition only about half of it is live material not released separately.
Thoughts anyone? LazyBastardGuy 17:10, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Additionally, I don't find any of the additional "live albums" categories to be appropriate either. LazyBastardGuy 17:11, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  English-language live albums 

message: I have unintentionally and accidentally taken part in an edit war with User:Statik_N over the past two days do to my want to include punk rock into the list of genres. I have multiple reliable citations calling the album punkhttps://www.theguardian.com/music/musicblog/2009/sep/21/nirvana-bleach-album-reissuehttp://www.uncut.co.uk/reviews/album/nirvana-bleach-r1989http://thequietus.com/articles/03458-nirvana-bleach-album-reissue-reviewhttp://www.creativeloafing.com/music/article/13030830/nirvana-bleach-deluxe-edition and although Stick N has claimed it, I have searched to try and find a consensus against the inclusion of the genre, and I have come up with no evidence to suggest that, only people saying that if it wants inclusion then there should be sources. Issan Sumisu (talk) 16:39, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't oppose including the genre in the infobox. it's just that adding punk rock to the genre field of Nirvana articles is controversial. Since I don't oppose it, find other people who do oppose it and then form a consensus with them. Besides, a lot of grunge pretty much is punk rock. See the edit page for the article Nirvana (band). it says you aren't allowed to add punk rock to the genre field there because it's been discussed extensively and is considered inappropriate. Statik N (talk) 16:42, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I can see people saying that on the edit page, but there was actually no consensus on any of the talk pages, the closest i could find was somebody saying that if they want to include the genre then they need sources, maybe it didn't archive correctly if it did happen.Issan Sumisu (talk) 16:55, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it has been discussed extensively for adding punk rock the main Nirvana page genre field and is considered inappropriate. i really don't think people will consider it appropriate to add punk rock on the Bleach genre field. besides, some grunge is punk rock anyways. Statik N (talk) 00:23, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punk rock 

message: My first press of the LP lists the spelling “Kurdt Kobain” on the sleeve. Looking at the article’s Wikitext, I’m inferring that there was a previous edit war about this and that the deniers of such spelling’s existence prevailed. And yet I’m staring at the name ”Kurdt Kobain” on this record from 30 years ago, yearning for this to be included in this article. So? Morganfitzp (talk) 19:52, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Kurds Kobain” 

message: , every time I return "hard-rock" to the genre-box for "Bleach", you remove it with insufficient reasoning. 
Your latest reason was: "The source you provided, and it only uses the term "70s influence heavy rock sound" as a over arching term to describe the Grunge sound favored by the label". This might, in your opinion, be the case, but "grunge" isn't mentioned anywhere in said sentence. The fact remains that the source describes the album as showcasing a "heavy-rock" sound, which in all other cases warrants the inclusion of a "hard-rock" genre. 
If you wish to change the genre, then your reasoning must be more substantial 
JoeyofScotia (talk) 19:21, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Also remember that just because Nirvana is a Grunge band, doesn't mean everything they do has to be considered Grunge. A Punk band can put out a Heavy metal song or album.  - FlightTime (open channel) 19:28, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , 
This has been discussed elsewhere at length on Wikipedia Wikipedia, the presence of "heavy rock" or "loud rock" within a reliable source suffices the inclusion of "hard rock" within the corresponding Wikipedia article.
Please do not remove sourced and discussed content without first consulting the Talk Page
Thanks,
JoeyofScotia (talk) 17:56, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

text:  See above discussion, thanks.
JoeyofScotia (talk) 14:50, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

text: Doesn't mean the source is calling it hard rock. just because wikipedia agrees loud rock heavy rock=hard rock doesn't mean everyone else does. many people say heavy rock to describe metal or grunge or punk. We aren't certain the source is calling it hard rock. So including hard rock is a bad idea. also, grunge kind of is a subgenre of hard rock. so should we also include simply rock as a source? since grunge is a subgenre of alternative rock, should we include alternative as a genre? it's redundant. Statik N (talk) 02:12, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hard rock"