lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Staatskapelle Dresden

message: I recommend changing the name of this article to either Sächsische Staatskapelle Dresden or Saxon State Orchestra Dresden.  If the word "Staatskapelle" isn't going to be translated for the article title, then the full name (Sächsische Staatskapelle Dresden) should be used.  And Dresden Staatskapelle is completely wrong.  
I'd offer to translate more from the German page as well, but I'm currently in the middle of a few other translating projects, so anyone else is welcome to it.  Tnmusikherr 13:52, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To be honest, I think the article could be just "Staatskapelle Dresden". Most people know the orchestra just by these two words. --Karljoos (talk) 21:04, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to agree that "Staatskapelle Dresden" would be the most appropriate title, as this is the name most widely used by concert promoters, record companies, radio stations and music critics in English language contexts. I note that this article has been renamed from "Dresden Staatskapelle", which was once more commonly used in the English-speaking world but seems to have fallen out of use. I also note, however, that the orchestra itself seems to prefer the full name "Sächsische Staatskapelle Dresden" even in English language usage. The question is, should an encyclopedia reflect common usage or officially preferred usage? --Deskford (talk) 13:27, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

text: The official website has no Dresdner Staatskapelle, so why was this moved? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:19, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I see no discussion leading to the recent move. It should be moved back to the established title unless there is consensus for the change, which I think is unlikely. --Deskford (talk) 09:30, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've put a request at WP:RMT for the move to be reverted. --Deskford (talk) 09:43, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: I removed Hiroshi Wakasugi's name from the list of chief conductors because there is no record anywhere of him holding that title.  He was, to be certain, a regular conductor with the orchestra for a number of years, but without the actual title of chefdirigent. DJRafe (talk) 23:58, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Chief conductor list, Hiroshi Wakasugi

message: §History: "However, Luisi resigned as chief conductor of the Staatskapelle in February 2010, effective immediately, after reports that the management had secured a contract with the ZDF network for a scheduled televised concert on New Year's Eve 2011 without consulting him at all in his capacity as the orchestra's GMD." Abbreviation not explained. General Music Director, maybe? 
13:53, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  GMD
Talk:From Eroica with Love

message: ANN Jason Thompson
--KrebMarkt (talk) 20:59, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s) 
Talk:Fujimi Orchestra

message: *http://www.animate.tv/news/details.php?id=1337129567 - Interview with Shōta Takasaki about the live-action movie.
*http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKNO5bE_prM Video interview with the movie stars, by Cinema Today, Japanese film news site.
*http://psycho-drama.com/index.php/film-reviews/333-fujimi-orchestra Movie review (English) by Jed Medina. Might not be RS.
-- Brainy J (previously Atlantima) ~✿~ (talk) 03:14, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference dump
Talk:Full Swing

message: I completely reworked (not logged in though) the previous plot which resembled a color sports commentary. It still needs a good copy edit and most likely some synonyms and punctuation changes. But, it's much more professional than the last one. --Gunblade (dicemus) 03:39, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Plot Summary 

message: It's hardly a stub now, is it ;) JONJONAUG 16:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed the stub 

message: If the caption under the picture on the template is going to be kept "He really swung the bat" (which is also found in the plot summary), then somewhere, Haruko's profound quote, "Nothing can happen until you swing the bat" should also be placed as it is monumentally important to the episode as well as Naota's actions.  --Gunblade (dicemus) 13:35, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template Caption 

message: As this was a redirect I have changed it to a disamnig page since Full Swing was also the name of a short lived quiz show in the UK hosted by Jimmy Tarbuck and involving golf and general knowledge. TheRetroGuy (talk) 14:03, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambig 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:In Full Swing#Requested move 25 March 2018.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:30, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[Talk:In Full Swing#Requested move 25 March 2018]]
Talk:Braxton Hicks contractions

message: This really ought to be called "Braxton Hicks Contractions" as that is the formal name and if you search under that name you can't find a page.
The sentence "It has since been found that Braxton Hicks' contractions are much less noticeable during exercise, whereas real contractions are not" is wrong grammar, and does not make sense. it should not say "not" at the end of it- "B/H is not noticeable during exercise, but real contractions are."
#i have removed the bottom text "when should i call my doctor" since i feel an encyclopedia does not have things like this.wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a medical guide.(Akhwandk (talk) 08:55, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The entire "Alleviating factors" section has specific recommendations for alleviating the contractions but has no sources. The information seems questionable at best. --TaviRider (talk) 20:53, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for alleviating factors

message: Wikipedia re-directs both "false labour" and "false labor" here. If the phrase "false labo(u)r" refers to a phenomenon that is not the same as Braxton Hicks contractions, then why is there no Wikipedia article on that other phenomenon? Since Braxton Hicks contractions feel like labo(u)r but aren't, it would be correct to refer to Braxton Hicks contractions as "false labo(u)r" UNLESS there is some other phenomenon that is different from Braxton Hicks contractions for which the term "false labo(u)r" is formally reserved. (If a plant looks enough like clover that many people will believe it is clover, but it is not clover, it is correct to call it "false clover" UNLESS there is a specific taxon of plant FORMALLY named "false clover", to the exclusion of other plants that look like clover sufficiently to fool people.) I'm not saying Braxton Hicks contractions are the same as false labo(u)r. I'm saying that the assertion that it is "incorrect" to refer to Braxton Hicks contractions as false labo(u)r is insufficiently sourced/explained unless there is more information about a phenomenon that is not Braxton Hicks contractions but is "correctly" called "false labo(u)r".2604:2000:C6AA:B400:DC5E:4DC6:49D6:61D8 (talk) 02:36, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is it 'incorrect' to call it "false labo(u)r"?

message: The history part refers to some singer but it should refer to a medical doctor Aop (talk) 19:01, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  History part is false 

message: This article could use more information and citations. We plan to use the signs and symptoms Wikipedia template as a guide to reorganize and expand on the following: definition, associated conditions (include a table comparing to "true" labor), pathophysiology, diagnostics, management, epidemiology, and history. 
Simc823 (talk) 17:50, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Work Plan
Talk:Futakoi Alternative

message: It seems the DVD reordered episode 3 to be two episodes later. Can anyone confirm? And does anyone know why? Mrthefter (talk) 23:16, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode list
Talk:GERWALK

message: Oppose.  I'd be tempted to oppose the merge on the basis that whoever threw up the tag couldn't be bothered to leave a rational, but more to the point, I came to GERWALK via The Super Dimension Cavalry Southern Cross.  & Yes, this isn't Wiktionary, but I think a great many reader of Wikipedia might not know what "GERWALK" means.  --mordicai. 03:06, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Gacha Gacha

message: The summary for the capsule part is an expanded version of the ann article summary, which may cause copyright problems. Ninja neko 15:11, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary 

message: Mania.com: 
*series 1 vol. 01 series 1 vol. 02 series 1 vol. 03 series 1 vol. 04 series 1 vol. 05
*series 2 vol. 01 series 2 vol. 02 series 2 vol. 03 series 2 vol. 04 series 2 vol. 05 series 2 vol. 7 series 2 vol. 11 --KrebMarkt 14:33, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s) 
Talk:Yevgeny Shaposhnikov

message: This following article says: "Later that night, Yeltsin's photographer called around midnight to offer me photos of Yeltsin sitting with General Shaposhnikov, the new head of the Russian Armed Forces (he had prevented an air attack on the Russian White House during the August Coup, and had been well rewarded)" 
http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2011/12/20-years-since-the-fall-of-the-soviet-union/100214/
I think that they're talking about Yevgeny.  Anyone know of a more authoritative source for that claim though?
174.119.228.150 (talk) 23:51, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prevented air attack on Russian White House during 1991 coup attempt?
Talk:Gamerz Heaven

message: Ha! I've waited as long as 7 years for some of the mangaka I collect from to finish a series. They run out of ideas & it takes a few years of notebooking & finishing othr projects, sometimes they get bored & start new series & only work on the hiatused one in-between, sometimes they just hold-out & switch publishers. Some of them scrap their projects & recycle the characters.
:Uh, the problem isn't the mangaka/artist - it's ADV.  They're pretty much defunct now when it comes to publishing manga.  Gamerz Heaven is still running in Japan.  ADV has completely dropped the ball on publishing it.  Get your facts straight before engaging in long-winded assumptions. 70.234.1.188 22:58, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: indefinate hiatus?

message: "It is overall an amazing manga. Murakami makes you love ALL the "good guys" as your favorites, and you just melt when you see Nata's cuteness. The story is awesome and well written. The uniforms are also amazing. You will LOVE Gamerz Heaven when you read it! Check it out at your public library or local bookstore."
...Yeah. I'm just going to WIPE this entire paragraph now.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.28.254.254 (talk) 05:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: THIS ISN'T BIASED AT ALL, IS IT?
Talk:Grigory Kulik

message: You think this is a stub, do you? OK, you do better. Adam 14:10, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Kulik must have commanded the artillery of some other formations, e.g, the 10th Army in 1918. 108.45.79.25 (talk) 22:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  1st Horse Army wasn't formed until 1919 

message: The article includes statements like “It also did not help that Kulik personally despised tanks and armored vehicles altogether”. In “The Red Army and the Second World War” Alexander Hill directly contradicts this. When the article mentions Voroshilov shortly after it does seem to portray him in a much better/more neutral light. With statements like the one above and “His miserable performance resulted in him being replaced” being included in the article, with no explanation being provided on why he preformed that miserably, I don’t think it can be considered neutral. This is made worse by the near complete lack of citations in large parts of the article. I will delete some of the most POV statement (which aren’t supported by any source and are contradicted by my source on the subject) immediately. If you have a valid reason to want include them I will just copy-paste them back in. Dorromikhal (talk) 01:17, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality (or the lack thereof) 

message: The section on this page about the Katyn massacre is really strange. It doesn't tell any coherent story unless you already know what the massare is and moreover doesn't reference Kulik at all. Perhaps it can be simply deleted? Unless someone can expand it to relate to Kulik? Parabellummatt (talk) 16:05, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Katyn Massacre Section?
Talk:Geobreeders

message: *THEM Anime Reviews
*EX Online
*Sequential Tart
**Book one (again)
**Book two (again)
**Book five
*Mania
**Anime
**Breakthrough
**vol. 1 (again)
**vol. 2 (again)
**vol. 3 (small edition)
**vol. 4
**vol. 5
*ANN: vol. 2
--Gabriel Yuji (talk) 21:13, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews
Talk:Gestalt (manga)

message: This article appears to be based mostly on the anime OAV and not the manga, despite the fact that it is indicated next to the title in parenthesis.76.6.32.68 (talk) 22:09, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *Mania.com: Manga vol. 7 Manga vol. 8 --KrebMarkt 16:06, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s) 
Talk:Getter Robo G

message: Would a screenshot from Metroid Fusion referring to the speed-powered move as "Shinespark" count as a citeable reference?  Kouban 00:43, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  That only illustrates that the Metroid series has a movement called the Shinespark.  That doesn't say anything about the purported link between Getter Robo and Metroid.  A citeable reference for this fact would be one from, say, an interview with one of the Metroid developers that specifically mentions that Metroid's Shinespark move was based on or inspired by the move in Getter Robo.  Otherwise, it can't be reliably proven that it's more than just coincidence, and that qualifies as Original Research. :/ — KieferSkunk (talk) — 07:04, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shinespark
Talk:Origin: Spirits of the Past

message: I added the music section and listed two songs by KOKIA. Argel1200 (talk) 23:16, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music 

message: Mania.com Special Edition --KrebMarkt (talk) 12:03, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s)
Talk:Glass Mask

message: This is fascinating.  Please provide some reference when/if you would like to move it back to the main article  Utawoutau (talk) 13:22, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miuchi redrawing previously published Glass Mask chapters 

message: No references were provided for the following sentence in the main article, so it was moved here  Utawoutau (talk) 13:22, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculation on the future of the manga storyline 

message: The following paragraph was removed from the main article because it doesn't feel like it should be in the primary article about Glass Mask Utawoutau (talk) 13:22, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similarities to other works 
Talk:Glass Fleet

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support, the official English title is Glass Feet, and Legend of the seems to have no actual source for being there. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 23:12, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Gravion Zwei

message: Do you think we should merge this article into the Gravion anime article because of it's small amount of information?
24.84.59.132 01:03, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Bikasuishin (talk) 16:01, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Most definitely. --Eruhildo (talk) 20:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As do I. Which is why I went ahead and did it. Marshall Stax (talk) 08:17, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Vasily Blyukher

message: ==Untitled==
The article Battle_of_Lake_Khasan states that Blyukher was executed; however, this article states that he died of illness while imprisoned. This contradiction needs to be resolved. With references, obviously! Aprogressivist (talk) 12:24, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction with Battle_of_Lake_Khasan article

message: The article Battle_of_Lake_Khasan states that Blyukher was executed; however, this article states that he died of illness while imprisoned. This contradiction needs to be resolved. With references, obviously! Aprogressivist (talk) 12:24, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Guru Guru Pon-chan

message: The volume section sounds more like a teaser than an encyclopedia with all the question in them, hence the tag. Ninja neko 08:42, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone

message: A really important piece of information that should probably be added to this article is the rating.  Is it mature, everyone, teen, or older teen?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.11.138.183 (talk) 23:11, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating? 

message: *ANN: Jason Thompson
--KrebMarkt (talk) 07:21, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s)
Talk:Sergey Akhromeyev

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/akhromeev.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  — Diannaa (talk) 13:52, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Margaret MacDonald (visionary)

message: We need references here. -Rey
Note: I've now made Margaret Macdonald (Prophecy) into a redirect to this article. See Talk:Margaret Macdonald (Prophecy) for that article's talk page. -- The Anome (talk) 11:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The spelling of her name is supposed to be "Mac" - as in Margaret MacDonald.
The article is not NPOV. There is no evidence presented for the associations, yet the article weaves in 7 references to dispensationalism and 6 to Darby.
Dave MacPherson is the one who originated the argument about MacDonald and the supposed association with dispensationalism. However scholars have shown that Dave MacPherson's arguments are untenable. First, there is the evidence that Darby wrote about his view in 1827, at least 3 years before the MacDonald prophecy came about. Second, MacDonald's prophecy - when read closely - show that she advocated a posttribulationist partial rapture. Its not a two staged event. But to try and make it into a two staged event, MacPherson's argument is based on highly speculative interpretation of certain words. Third, there is the glaring fact that neither Margaret MacDonald or Irving were dispensationalists themselves. Adding to these are other factors, such as that MacPherson's arguments depend on accepting the existence of a conspiracy among dispensationalist leaders (i.e. his book Incredible Cover-up). Lamorak (talk) 03:57, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Lamorak.  I just now changed the title of the article to "Margaret MacDonald (visionary)" (corrected the spelling of "MacDonald"). Wideangle (talk) 20:57, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling and NPOV
Talk:Domino Recording Company

message: Given the relevant importance of defunct labels versus current labels, I am going to suggest moving the current article titled Domino Records to Domino Records (defunct), and moving Domino Records (UK) to Domino Records.  Given that modern Domino Records have a significant base in the United States, its current article title is misleading.
Please vote on proposals at Talk:Domino Records.
DJR (T) 14:14, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Domino "UK"

message: Although this is now a vast improvement I maintain, for the record, that I think that Domino Records (1993), with the link line at the top to provide DAB, should be moved (here) to Domino Records.  My rationale is based on WP:DAB - Section 4.2:
:Primary topic
:When the primary meaning for a term or phrase is well known (indicated by a majority of links in existing articles, and by consensus of the editors of those articles), then use that topic for the title of the main article, with a disambiguation link at the top. Where there is no such consensus, there is no primary topic page.
:Ensure that the "(disambiguation)" page links back to an unambiguous page name.  The unambiguous page name should redirect to the primary topic page. This assists future editors (and automated processes).
::For example, the primary topic Rome links to Rome (disambiguation), where there is a link back via Rome, Italy (rather than directly to Rome).
This is a clear example of such a situation.  Taking a quick look at "What links here", and you will discover that 99% of the links are for the 1993 Domino Records.  Of course, a bot will shortly take care of that so it will be impossible to see, but my point remains.  Hopefully others will see this and a remedy can be agreed.  DJR (Talk) 18:36, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: DABs

message: *Domino Records (1993) → Domino Records —(Discuss)— Primary usage per WP:DAB 3.3.2 —DJR (T) 00:46, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: new move request

message: *Support - as nom.  DJR (T) 00:46, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: *And what will happen to the DAB article? Vegaswikian 22:28, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dicussion
Talk:Muktananda

message: We need to be very careful with using Rodarmor as the only source of extraordinary claims. Firstly, such claims must be corroborated by other sources independent from Rodarmor. Secondly, Rodarmor himself is very careful and purposefully vague. For instance, he has has not written anywhere that Muktananda himself issued death threats. In absence of direct quoting, we should really avoid going beyond what's in the source. — kashmīrī TALK 07:39, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rodarmor as the source 

message: Regarding this revert, edit-summary
which removed
see the same page 25:
Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 02:36, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That's Caldwell's take. But his autobiography (on cursory glance) doesn't mention the existence of any Tantra or Kaula teacher. It;s no secret that Muktananda was self-taught on Tantra, and from Hindi books since his understanding of Sanskrit was quite poor. Even assuming that he secretly admired Abhinavagupta (obviously, without studying his Sanskrit works), can we blindly copy Caldwell's assertion on Kaula here? For once I agree with the IP editor to remove the passage. Muktananda's acts were not Tantric practices IMO; it was sexual molestation and rape, plain and simple. — kashmīrī TALK 02:56, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't write about our opinions, we write about what WP:RS say. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 03:04, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  We need to assess the value of sources ourselves. And we can judge that Caldwell has no idea about Kaula. — kashmīrī TALK 09:34, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tantra