lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Liang Fa

message: Just a note. It seems that in most Western sources the man is known as Liang Afa. Since this is an English language article it might be good to feature this name a bit more prominently and include it in search results (since Afa is what westerners will be looking for.)
Zotlan 20:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: — LlywelynII 03:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: I understand the "some Chinaman" attitude of the Brits during this period but you can't cite Davies for Liang's work when Davies doesn't mention any Chinese workers at all. 
* .
is only a source for Dyer's work in Malaysia, which is irrelevant to this article. You need some source saying that Liang was involved with it.
There are entire paragraphs of this article that aren't about Liang at all. The passage on Hobson belongs in his article () and this
: The Methodist Church in England sent missionary George Piercy to China.. In 1851, Piercy went to Guangzhou, where he worked in a trading company.  In 1853, he started a church in Guangzhou. In 1877, Chau was ordained by the Methodist Church, where he pastored for 39 years (incumbent 1877-1916).
belongs with an article on Hok Chau, not here. — LlywelynII 03:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: What a mess

message: Much more at McNeur, including this affecting passage regarding his punishment and details re: his wife. — LlywelynII 00:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for article expansion

message: This article strongly implies that Liang Fa distributed his works to Hong Xiuquan.  Jen Yu-wen in The Taiping Revolutionary Movement 14 (1973) claims this is not possible (and IIRC other books have stated the same).  The link to the PDF source backing up this claim appears to be broken.  Is there any recent, credible scholarship in support of this claim?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbrote (talk • contribs) 06:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hong Xiuquan 
Talk:Masaki Kobayashi

message: Odd how much my idea of what makes an acceptable entry has changed in the last two years:  Here's a bit I cut myself, which I added two years ago.  No word on whether the film Kwaidan--or its director--influenced the name given for Keyser Soze's lawyer in The Usual Suspects. ... Similar removals at John Sayles.  ^_^  Koyaanis Qatsi 02:58 28 Jun 2003 (UTC)
In the reference I don't see anything about Kobayashi refusing to fight. It merely says he refused to become an officer. JC114.172.214.148 (talk) 01:10, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: And time goes by, so swiftly now...
Talk:20th Century Studios

message: Home Sweet Home Alone, which was released on November 12, 2021, and it became the first and only film released by 20th Century Studios on Disney+, as subsequent projects were transferred over to Walt Disney Pictures. However, Night at the Museum: Kahmunrah Rises Again became 20th Century Studios' fourth and last film released by Walt Disney Pictures before subsequent projects were transferred back to 20th Century Studios just like the Hulu original films. Animation134 (talk) 17:23, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  20th Century Studios films released by Walt Disney Pictures from Diary of a Wimpy Kid in 2021 to Night at the Museum Kahmunrah Rises Again in 2022 

message: Look I know there has been edit wars alot about Disney distrubuting 20th Century stuff but I just don't understand. Even the pages say "Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures distributes and markets the films produced by 20th Century Studios" yet no one removed it and the previous person said it is incorrect and even the movies 20th does never mention "Distrubuted by Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures" so for every movie 20th does are we not gonnna mention Disney at all its as if people still think 20th Century is a seperate studio instead of being owned by Disney. NakhlaMan (talk) 07:34, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No, we're not going to mention Disney. InfiniteNexus (talk) 05:45, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Any reason why?  NakhlaMan (talk) 08:54, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Per the four five reasons I very clearly outline in the section above (#Distribution). InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:48, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Distribution Kerfufle again...
Talk:Seere

message: Can you give us a cite for who says this? Are there standard demonological texts which agree on this, or is this from a single source? -- The Anome 07:26 28 Jun 2003 (UTC)
:This is an old question, but I will answer it. First of all, I dont know what you consider "standard demonological texts" , but this demon is only mentioned (as far as i know) in the Pseudomonarchia Daemonum, which is a very canonical work on demonology by Johann Weyer. I haven't cross referenced the text in the wikipedia with the text of the Pseudomonarchia, but judging from the structure of it, I can tell that the first paragraph (except the "also known as" part) is copied verbatim from Weyer's text. I promise I will cross reference the text and delete the content that is not in the Pseudomonarchia. --Legion fi (talk) 07:37, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Well, first of all I would like to correct myself. This demon is only referred in the Lemegeton Clavicula Salomonis. I've checked the most widely know translations of the text(which are those of Peterson and the Mathers/Crowley one), and I can confirm that most of the content of the article can be referenced to them. There is some minor interpretation, but I will edit that later. Also, in both texts the canonical name is Seere, not Seir, the latter only mentioned in the Mathers/Crowley version (as well as the other a.k.a.). So I'm proposing a move to Seere and a redirect of this article to that one. If no one objects I will move this article next weekend. --Legion fi (talk) 21:49, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  About sources for this article and some other things
Talk:Demonology

message: I have to say, yes it is an occupation as it is a job a few people do for good money (look at the Warrens). This is not some kind of endorsement , as both "occupation" and "professional" means you get paid to do it, not that you are any good at it (or indeed that what you do is not a con job). Slatersteven (talk) 18:49, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you suggest a WP:RS for "Demonology is also known as a career path"? Perhaps more relevantly as an editor, would you think it worthwhile including such a statement to preface brief mentions of prominent demonologists? NebY (talk) 19:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No, and no. Brunton (talk) 19:44, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

text: I did not suggest "Demonology is also known as a career path", and yes I would say if they did it as a paid job say so. Slatersteven (talk) 20:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I know, I was quoting this, which is where this started. There's a difference between saying that so-and-so made money or a living out of being a demonologist and saying that demonology is "also known as a carreer path" or "also known as an occupation". NebY (talk) 20:49, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Occupation 

message: The redirect Ars Millennia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Veverve (talk) 16:01, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: want to join 41.81.81.124 (talk) 09:02, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Too late, done and dusted. Slatersteven (talk) 09:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Ars Millennia]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Ars Millenia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Veverve (talk) 16:01, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Ars Millenia]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Bank and Monument stations

message: The connection to Monument is an escalator, not a Travolator. There is a moving walkway (no longer an Otis Travolator) in the complex, between the W&C platforms and the Central Line. More at CULG (natch). --rbrwr 13:59, 28 June 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: The moving walkway runs between the booking hall and the W&C not the Central line and W&C Wilmot1 15:36, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As a passenger who uses it a lot I know that 'Bank Northern' is effectively closer to 'Monument District' platforms than they are to 'Bank Central'. For all practical purposes to get to Central from Northern one is walking the full length of King William Street underground. 92.10.41.176 (talk) 04:45, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: connection to Monument

message: Although they are connected, the stations are surely so far apart that they should have their own seperate articles. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 12:59, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Could we at least have the correct lat-longs for each bit? Railwayfan2005 (talk) 21:37, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Split?

message: I am not sure if this is the correct place to add my comment. I remember using Bank/Monument station when I was aged 11 in 1968, as far as I can recall there was an additional underground train line that was operated by the post office. The trains were smaller than the Central Line trains and the train conveyed passengers as well as parcels. Is this correct? 
adlington.robert@gmail.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.130.247.70 (talk) 10:50, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That'll be London Post Office Railway a.k.a. Mail Rail. "Passengers" were only carried on special occasions. Nick Cooper (talk) 10:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Post Office line

message: Woudln't it be sensible to rename this article simply Bank-Monument station, considering that it is also served by the DLR (not part of the London Underground)? Don Quixote is awesome (talk) 19:32, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this should move to Bank and Monument stations. We seem to be inventing a double barrel name here that doesn't exist outside Wikipedia.  MRSC (talk) 05:48, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually quite a few TfL and media sources call it Bank-Monument. I think the main talking point is usually the complex which surrounds the three stations (Bank LU, Monument LU and Bank DLR). CrossHouses (talk) 06:15, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you got links? I see bank and monument far more than Bank-Monument. In particular from TfL sources   MRSC (talk) 09:02, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New title 

message: According to TfL, free OSIs are only valid for Bank and Monument with surrounding NR stations but not other tube stations, i.e. Cannon Street and Liverpool Street. I wonder if it's still free to touch out Bank-Monument, in/out Liverpool Street NR and lastly in Liverpool Street tube. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 01:45, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of OSI
Talk:Commodity

message: Since the SEC has determined that bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are considered commodities, it would be prudent to add a section on this interpretation of what constitutes a commodity (vs. fiat vs. security). Niubrad (talk) 01:21, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cryptocurrency 

message: Gujarati 2409:4041:2E05:4B2E:A71C:2FB1:A520:2E3C (talk) 03:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commodity 

message: Reading this article in its current form, you would be excused for thinking that Karl Marx invented commodities, or certainly its definition. It's a pretty good indication of Wikipedia's bias though. 89.8.26.93 (talk) 10:38, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karl Marx invented commodities
Talk:National Coalition Party

message: "Finnish: Kansallinen Kokoomus; Kok.; Swedish: Samlingspartiet" --So the Finnish party name includes the word "National", but the Swedish version of the name doesn't (it just means "coalition party" - correct?  Any idea why this divergence? 86.186.41.239 (talk) 14:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: never ask about the accuracy of translations of skandinavian parties Braganza (talk) 08:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Eric XI of Sweden

message: King Eric had a club foot and was also called Ericus Balbus. The English word halter is the closest possible translation of the Swedish "halte". Educated English-speakers know that the English verb "halt" is to limp. Non-Swedish natives do not flatter themselves by being masteful about the English language or trying to ridicule English natives using English correctly. SergeWoodzing (talk) 10:35, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Epithet translation 
Talk:History of Wikipedia

message: In October 2023, a generative artificial intelligence capable of verifying the correspondence between text and cited sources, evaluating the degree of reliability of the sources and selecting alternatives from the web was tested in the English Wikipedia. 176.200.82.175 (talk) 08:28, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct, in my opinion, it’s relevant and this is commonly used when editing articles with adding content. -“Userbase3913” (talk) 03:44, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not notable?it's relevant for the future  

message: I get there's drama about him and Wales but it feels like bad page design 142.113.236.167 (talk) 05:20, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks a bit better now. —Panamitsu (talk) 05:41, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the first hyperlink for Sanger's name so far down?
Talk:Left ventricle

message: there is an error in pressure values. The left ventricle receives blood from lungs during diastole at very low pressures, just few mmHg. Mentioned 80 mmHg are in aorta during diastole, not in the left ventricle.
----
how long has it been since we finnaly new about all the bicuspid and tricupid valves? when did humans discover this in the human anatomy?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.188.254.194 (talk) 17:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  error in pressure values of the left ventricle
Talk:Ketuvim

message: I added a section regarding the canonization of the Ketuvim as a part of the Hebrew Bible and the Christian Old Testament. There is still a lot that could be done with this section.
I would like to get back to this page and add a section regarding the criteria to which a text was held in order to be counted among the Biblical canon of the Ketuvim.
Any other assistance in this arena would be excellent!
Nws106 (talk) 05:25, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canonization 

message: I've changed the article to give the latter instead of the former as the "actual Biblical Hebrew", in accordance with the spelling "כְּתוּבִים" and the transliteration scheme employed by Thomas O. Lambdin in "Introduction to Biblical Hebrew" and which seems to agree with where I have seen Biblical Hebrew transcribed elsewhere. However, I've put a note here, partly to defend my modification, and partly cause I'm not 100% confident in it... for a couple reasons:
# I have seen the apostrophe used in some places instead of the schwa, e.g. "l'chaim", so I'm not immediately ready to call its use here "incorrect". I think that might only be a convention of Modern Hebrew, but I'm not sure and haven't asked anyone, so maybe I'm wrong.
# I'm unaware of whether the spelling "K'thubhim" has any conventionalized usage anywhere. Additionally, "K'thubhim" (as well as "K'thuvim") both get way more Google hits than "Kəṯûḇîm". However, "Ketuvim" gets more than all three of them combined. I think the version as I have edited it makes it clear that "Ketuvim" is the commonly used, grandfathered-in, mostly-phonetic spelling while "Kəṯûḇîm" is the scholarly, historical transliteration of the original Hebrew. "K'thubhim" doesn't seem to fit either role that well.
Also, the spelling "K'thubhim" wasn't accompanied by any citation that supported it. Cevlakohn (talk) 05:50, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  K'thubhim vs. Kəṯûḇîm 
Talk:Teletext

message: Per MOS:CONSISTENCY,  with  I've just changed a few spellings of "analogue" to "analog". Both were used in the article, but it seems to be consistent with "color" as I am assuming a preference for U.S. spelling.
That being said, the article has perhaps greater "ties" to the U.K. per MOS:TIES, so perhaps these should be changed to use British English. 89.147.70.16 (talk) 09:02, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[MOS:ENGVAR]] 

message: There should be a section explaining the types of content available. --Error (talk) 18:56, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uses
Talk:High Court of Chivalry

message: I remember reading in a book about heraldry a long time ago that the ruling stopped the theatre company using the coat of arms on the company seal yet allowed it to continue to use the coat of arms upon the safety curtain of the theatre until such time as the safety curtain was replaced as a result of normal replacement due to wear.
----
"About the Court of Chivalry " is broken.
: Fixed. Thanks.
: James F. (talk) 12:29, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: To which court would appeals (theoretically) be directed?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.2.122.83 (talk) 19:37, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: To the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. I have added new text to that effect. Lyndwood (talk) 01:56, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

text: I have amended Andrew Gwilliam's new wording to try to reflect the fact that, although appeals lie to the Privy Council since 1832 there haven't actually been any (yet). Lyndwood (talk) 08:00, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Appeal
Talk:Myalgia

message: Either he's putting it on for the camera, or someone should phone an ambulance.  It just doesn't look genuine :-)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.48.95 (talk) 01:07, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This is unnecessarily rude. Please be kinder in the future. 162.237.194.208 (talk) 22:48, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The picture 

message: Is "Myalgia" the same as Myalgic Encephalomyelitis or are they different conditions? The Rod 05:21, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: i'm pretty sure they're different - i was diagnosed with myalgia last year but the doctor is adamant that i won't get M.E. - i think that M.E. is much more severe as it involves constant fatigue as well, whereas myalgia is just having problems with muscles [[User : han] han] 17:35, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't get ME through myalgia. It's a post-viral disease, with myalgia as a consequence. Guido den Broeder (talk) 10:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Myalgic encephalomyelitis is still the WHO's official name for this disease. CFS is a working diagnosis. There is no proof that the name ME is wrong. Guido den Broeder (talk) 10:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Myalgic Encephalomyelitis 

message: Some items of relevance I thought people should know.  Tetanus vaccine can induce myalgia as can sudden cessation (known on the street as 'going cold turkey') of opioids (at abusive doses).  I should probably mention that in patients taking β1-blockers this is not just possible but probably with tetanus vaccine.  DrMorelos 18:51, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Injection site pain is a common adverse event with any vaccine and is not specific to tetanus nor is it "myalgia" in the usual sense since.  Looking at  and the package inserts for ADACEL ( toxoid), Baytet (), and Boostrix (), I don't see any mention of any interaction with beta blockers.  The injection site pain event is usually on the order of 10-20%.  Myalgia is mentioned in the Boostrix package insert as having been reported in uncontrolled postmarketing studies, but it's not an AE that took place in clinical trials involving 3,080 subjects.Somedumbyankee (talk) 23:42, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added to the List 2006-11-24 

message: Can't myalgia also be caused by taking Tryptophan supplements (although I believe they are now banned in the US)? --Marshmellis (talk) 22:26, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tryptophan supplements 

message: It can worsen the muscle state not improve it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.113.184.161 (talk) 15:39, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zocor is not a good medicine.
Talk:Gold chalcogenides

message: I am not always in favor of merges, but this topic is such a tiny niche that the content might be more useful in the article on gold.  The chalcogenides of gold are extremely rare and usually unstable (hence gold does not tarnish).  At least that is my impression.--Smokefoot (talk) 18:56, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good luck writing up the gold tellurides, that info would be welcome.--Smokefoot (talk) 22:18, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge
Talk:Edlin

message: what is it less powerful than? and is this NPOV? Iammaxus 04:53 29 Jun 2003 (UTC)
----
An anonymous user, User:148.126.100.80, is repeatedly removing the paragraph below from the article with the edit summary: Again: This is not a quippy advocacy blog. I'm sure that is very funny to all 16 zealots who run this place, but unless there is PROOF it should be removed or reworded. -- "The edlin line editor was thrown together in two weeks in 1981, and was expected to have a six-month shelf life. Some industry pundits have suggested that this is the only Microsoft-written MS-DOS program that is bug-free; this is entirely false, however, as Seattle Computer Products, not Microsoft, wrote EDLIN."
I don't know which is "correct" but I think that the burden of proof is on User:148.126.100.80 to demonstrate what is NPOV about that paragraph.
Thanks, BCorr|Брайен 16:59, May 25, 2004 (UTC)
:Yeah, well, this sentence is a very good joke, but the way it's turned it took me quite a few seconds to catch it, so considering that the may goal here is not being funny... Oh, or maybe it is anyway. :-)
:By the way, my Win2k version of EDLIN does not work properly. --Valmi ✒ 22:55, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The "shelf life" part of the comment is certainly false. It displays a misapprehension that EDLIN was only intended as a basic text editor for users. EDLIN (with FIND and SORT) was part of the data-processing facilities of DOS, and was documented as such. Replicating similar utilities on mainframes and minicomputers.  These utilities remained available because they were used by system scripts, even when they had long been superseded for end-user use.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.162.148 (talk) 01:17, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Coriander

message: Cilantro can be planted in the spring after the last frost date or in the fall. Cilantro grows best in cooler weather, so avoid planting it in the summer heat. Cilantro has a tap root and doesn't transplant well, so direct seeding is recommended. Sow seeds 1–2 seeds per inch, ¼–½" deep, in rows 12–18" apart. Before planting, you can prepare the seeds by gently crushing the husk that connects the two seeds and soaking them in distilled water for 24 to 48 hours. Cilantro needs moist soil, so check the soil every couple of days and water plants in beds about an inch per week. You can also use a soaker hose or drip irrigation. When growing cilantro in containers, you may need to water more frequently, especially as temperatures begin to rise. When cilantro plants reach about 2 inches in height, you can feed them with a water-soluble fertilizer. You can also encourage prolific leaf production by regularly feeding with a water-soluble plant food. You can harvest cilantro leaves once they are large enough to eat. Avoid harvesting more than a third of the plant at any one time. The plant will continue to produce leaves for a month or two before it dies. FloridaGardener352 (talk) 03:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultivation