lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tribes of Jharkhand

message: Shouldn't this page be merged with Tribes of Jharkhand, India?  It seems to me they are covering the same topic in two different articles. 70.186.172.75 09:42, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In three different articles, actually.  The merge is now complete.  Thanks to Tobias for doing all the grunt work to make the merger possible!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 20:40, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: What does this mean: "wooden artwork in the should of Tribals of Jharkhand"? I'm trawling through looking for abuse of "should of" for "should have": this isn't one of those, but I don't know what it means. PamD (talk) 12:04, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "should"? 

message: This articles is very old and not updated (it is still using 2001 census records when it should be using 2011's).Komchi✉☆ 15:55, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed
Talk:Tubeless tire

message: I have amended the wording of this article to make it more readable. It still isn't perfect, and the spelling (tire/tyre) needs tidying - I'll revisit it when I have a bit more time... Paul-b4 09:34, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: May 2007

message: "Road tubeless is gaining popularity among riders for whom the benefits are worth the costs." Of course, anything can be worthwhile if the benefits outweigh the costs. Hope someone can clarify this by adding what the advantages and disadvantages are. Sauer202 (talk) 16:26, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular among those whom the benefits are worth the costs..
Talk:Consultant pharmacist

message: I've made a start, and should be able to expand, on non-US consultant pharmacists Kev (talk) 07:15, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internationalisation 
Talk:Gielgud Theatre

message: How do you pronounce Gielgud ? ===  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.2.192 (talk) 14:44, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: With two hard Gs, like Geel-good.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:57, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: According to WP:Bookspam (part of WP:ADVERT):
::Sometimes Wikipedia sees bookspam, which is the insertion of text mentioning books to call attention to the books, rather than to contribute to the article. This often takes the form of inserting book listings into reference sections although the book is not used as the source of any information in the article. Bookspam is also seen as the addition of books to "external links", "further reading" or similar sections, although the books added do not add any useful and relevant information.
The same is true of the reference to the DVD, Great West End Theatres.  Reporting that the Gielgud Theatre is discussed on this DVD contributes nothing to the article or to the reader's knowledge of the Gielgud Theatre, but simply serves to promote this commercial product.  No information is listed in the article as being uniquely sourced from this DVD, instead the wikipedia page about the theatre is used to promote a commercial product. There may be any number of commercial products that have references to the Gielgud Theatre - but it is not the purpose of this wikipedia page to promote any of them.
NoMatterTryAgain (talk) 19:18, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not one DVD.  It is a 40-part DVD series - one DVD for each of the 40 West End Theatres that vary in length from 42 to 80 minutes each.  The series includes a DVD about the history, architecture and mechanical capabilities of the Gielgud Theatre.  See Great West End Theatres.  The Stage newspaper said that the series: "Promises to be the most definitive guide to Theatreland". (The Stage article)  So, it seems to me that this definitive documentary would be of interest to many readers of this article.  One could say that it is premature to mention it, since the episode on the Gielgud Theatre has not yet been released, but the mention does not take up much space in the article.  See the official website.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:57, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVDspam
Talk:Rubí (2004 TV series)

message: rubi luis luis perla perla  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.159.56.196 (talk) 00:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  rubi 

message: rubi e mnogo krasiva no predpo4ete parite pred istinskata liubov.no,sled kato izgubi kraka i krasotata si izgubi i alehandro
ako fernanda se vodi po vodite i shte se slu4i sashtoto i s neia  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.66.239.168 (talk) 12:54, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  rubi 

message: This article is overall fairly good, but seems to be heavily written by people for whom English is a second language. Much of the English syntax is faulty. This seems to be a recurring problem for articles on Mexican or Spanish subject-matter.--WickerGuy (talk) 20:30, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  English Syntax problems 
Talk:Leonidas Berry

message: Some of the biographical information was taken from the NLM site http://www.nlm.nih.gov/hmd/manuscripts/ead/berry.html. Although a bit modified, some is just copied because from the NLM Copyright Information page I understand that that text is in the public domain (Government information at NLM Web sites is in the public domain.) Optimale Gu 09:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NLM text in public domain
Talk:Renaissance magic

message: Are there any plans to actually go through, add proper citations and flesh out the articles content? It appears that there is are a lot of sources and ideas that could be blown up. Such as delving specifically into the individual types of magic (such as geomancy) for this time period.Jtm7dd (talk) 17:42, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Arbitrary heading 2
Talk:Organotin chemistry

message: *Organotin Compounds: Industrial Applications and Biological Investigation
*--Stone 10:02, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References 

message: There is a wikipedia article for triphenyltin hydride. Does this qualify for the important compounds list? Lavateraguy 13:24, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Triphenyltin hydride

message: The first diagram purports to show an Sn-C bonding, but the “C” appears to be “Cl” instead. 2A00:23C8:A5D9:1:500A:1D38:5EF3:D9CC (talk) 18:39, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  First diagram
Talk:C-level

message: The content of this article almost totally overlaps that of Corporate title, and there seems no significant necessity to separate them. --supernorton 10:20, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've redirected the page to "corporate title", so when typing C-level in, you will be taken to the proper place. This article was nothing more than already mentioned in that article. -Toon05 17:49, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to [[Corporate title]]
Talk:Germplasm

message: I do not think this is an adequate account of Weismann's views, but as am engaged elsewhere cannot rewrite at present. Suffice it to say that if both Francis Crick and John Maynard Smith thought Weismann was a key link between Darwin and the present day, then he deserves some attention.  Macdonald-ross 10:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

message: I split the article, but I'm not sure the links to other languages are correct. Since I cannot read them, I kindly ask people who can to scrutinize if they need to be redirected. Mikael Häggström 12:07, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: — Assignment last updated by Madisontate1 (talk) 14:10, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Conservation biology
Talk:Netvigator

message: Why does UK Broadband redirect to this? It makes no sense.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.133.14.220 (talk • contribs) 
:Because UK Broadband is, or was when the redirect was created, the company that runs MyNow, or Now Broadband, which used to be Netvigator in the UK.  Fiddle Faddle 13:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to)..  Additionally the UK part is assuredly not from the company;s literature. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:33, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: May 2007‎

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:37, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 
Talk:Orange Democratic Movement

message: I have proposed that Orange Democratic Movement–Kenya be merged into this page: the two parties have enough in common that they can be covered by one article, as shown by the fact that these two articles currently have almost identical content. If anyone disagrees, please say so below; if no one does, I will carry out this merge myself. Terraxos (talk) 23:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: the article actually doesn't say what (which ideology) the party stands for.--Severino (talk) 12:43, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content 

message: The redirect Òrange Democratic Party (Kenya) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 23:42, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Òrange Democratic Party (Kenya)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Intercalation (university administration)

message: Should this be in Wikitionary instead of here? Simesa 10:40, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Woodrow Landfair

message: On this date an anonymous editor placed a comment in the body of the article.  That comment stated the opinion that the article was blatant self-promotion.  I agree with the comment and removed it and placed a clean-up tag on the article.  The article needs to be re-written in a neutral, more encyclopedic tone.  A Softer Answer (talk) 15:51, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up for tone
Talk:Woodside tram stop

message: The station needs a separate article. A mass of former train services, its (here unmentioned) renamings are nothing to do with trams.--SilasW (talk) 08:31, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As a memo: the ry sta opened as Woodside, was renamed Woodside & South Norwood, then went back to Woodside--SilasW (talk) 11:02, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station v. tramstop 
Talk:Nepal house martin

message: :This review is transcluded from Talk:Nepal House Martin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
:GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#:: Very well written!
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#:: Very well sourced, one of the better GA's I've read in a while.
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#:: I learned a bit about this species I had never heard of before today, all bases are covered!
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#It is stable.
#:No edit wars, etc.: 
#:: 
#It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
#:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
#:: Although I'm not a big "image guy", if you want to move this up to FAC, you might want to consider a picture of the nest in that section, a minor point, but it could help the article, the ones on Commons didn't appear High-res enough to use as a thumbnail, so I didn't add one.
#Overall: Good job!  I enjoyed doing this one!
#:Pass/Fail: 
#:: 
Reviewer: Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 00:59, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Review
Talk:Pikit

message: I've cleaned the article up a bit - improved the layout and moved the census link to a ref. Hope it's OK. Tom H 22:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Can this article be updated to include which barangays will be lost to the BARMM due to the Plebiscite?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.201.128.91 (talk) 23:03, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: BARMM
Talk:Bedford River Festival

message: I used to run one of the major events at the River festival it is one of the largest UK events in terms of people attending (circa 250k).I have added BBC report on last years festival.
Mjwalshe 11:52, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Largest events in England, or UK, or just Bedfordshire?--DThomsen8 (talk) 01:11, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Largest events?
Talk:Kilsby Tunnel

message: ... this awkward sentence:
“During the tunnel's service life, there have been no major problems or difficulties with the structure have reportedly been experienced.“  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:44B8:3102:BB00:D97:DED6:BB5A:7DB2 (talk) 09:51, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. G-13114 (talk) 11:09, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please fix...
Talk:6063 aluminium alloy

message: Propose Metric units for all values
Chemical composition
Popcorn no minimum, maximum 0.10% - please rectify  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vincenthooi (talk • contribs) 03:19, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It would be helpful to all of us who want to know more about bikes frames, to have a comparison chart between standard industry aluminum alloys and the so called custom alloys that some companies claim to offer. For instance, we have the A1,M4 and M5 from Specialized or the Alpha Silver, Alpha Gold & Alpha Platinum from Trek, etc. Are they really custom made ? If so, how can we compare them to make a better purchase decision ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.53.99.4 (talk) 16:45, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison tools
Talk:Common misunderstandings of genetics

message: The lead names 4 misconceptions directly. Following the Debunking Handbook, I propose to rephrase the 4 points (and their introducing sentence), to not repeat the incorrect information, but phrase them so they state correct information. The List of common misconceptions also does this. Any comments? Nuretok (talk) 19:33, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I rephrased the entries. Please feel free to improve the wording.Nuretok (talk) 12:26, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording
Talk:Half-reaction

message: I can't figure out which is the half-reaction, the first one listed or each of the set after that. Plus of course the article needs to be expanded.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jojojlj (talk • contribs) 01:13, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In a whole reaction, electrons balance.  In a half reaction, they don't.  In electrochemical cells, one half reaction occurs at each electrode. Gah4 (talk) 00:52, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear article! 

message: In describing half reactions for electrochemical cells, it is usual to give the voltage (energy/electron) of the reaction, such that one can add or subtract, as appropriate, to determine the cell voltage.  Should this article include these? Gah4 (talk) 00:53, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  voltage 

message: The article says Half-reactions can be written to describe both the metal undergoing oxidation (known as the anode) and the metal undergoing reduction (known as the cathode).  It seems to me that often enough a non-metallic compound is used, and in the case of a fuel cell, a non-metallic gas. Can we use a different word than metal?  Gah4 (talk) 19:19, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  metal? 

message: The article says: A chemist can atom balance and charge balance one piece of an equation at a time.  As well as I know, in the majority of reactions, that is true. In math terms, one can write an equation ladder, such that one can sequentially solve the system. Less often, one ends up with two simultaneous equations, which can't be solved one at a time. Maybe even three is possible, but usually two. As far as I know, this most often happens with redox equations, which is the reason for the special treatment of redox equations in chemistry class. I don't think this is in the redox article yet, though. Gah4 (talk) 19:10, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''A chemist can atom balance and charge balance one piece of an equation at a time''
Talk:Pompeii in popular culture

message: add pompeji by deftones from the albums ohms plsplspls 2A01:11CF:4A7:C00:3C87:6850:F8ED:B6D0 (talk) 16:59, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  music
Talk:The Next Best Thing (TV series)

message: Are the judges actually "well-known"? Is their wit actually "razor sharp"? Are some of the contestants actually "really good at it"? And do people actually "watch" this crap? 63.215.28.84 11:49, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are trying to say that it should be rewritten, I agree, I just don't have the time to do it right now. Penman 1701 19:40, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:George Street tram stop

message: I've found an image here  which I think is of George Street (it's not labelled as such) - looking at a bird's eye view on Windows Live Maps has made me pretty sure. Can anyone (perhaps living locally) confirm this is correct. If so I can upload the image to Commons and add it to the article. -=# Amos E Wolfe talk #=- 19:17, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Image
Talk:Forest Hill railway station

message: 4 tph to London Bridge 
2 tph to London Victoria via Crystal Palace
2 tph to Coulsdon Town via Purley
Currently (july 2021) 2 tph London bridge  and to east Croydon. 
Victoria and coulsdon don't run.
But may be  covid limitation. Andrewblack (talk) 22:27, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change to southern service (july 2021
Talk:Brockley railway station

message: The redirect Brockley tube station has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Pkbwcgs (talk) 14:22, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Brockley tube station]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Unit trust

message: Would you consider adding an external link to http://www.Morningstar.co.uk as a resource for people interested in researching UK unit trusts further? 
Thanks,
62.190.147.3 12:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not. See WP:ELNO. Daniel Case (talk) 19:58, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedians...
Talk:Open-ended investment company

message: Wikipedians,
Would you consider adding an external link to http://www.morningstar.co.uk to assist those looking to research these funds further? We cover more than 10,000 UK open-end funds. 
62.190.147.3 12:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External link request

message: I'm planning to move ICVC back to OEIC because OEIC is by far the dominant usage and dominant usage is preferred over the most strictly technically correct. This will undo the opposite move that you did back in 2005. Please let me know if you agree, disagree about OEIC being the most common term or disagree for some other reason. Jamesday (talk) 15:42, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: DISAGREE - I see no advantage in the move.  simonthebold (talk) 12:17, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Move

message: This article is incorrect when it says that a unit trust cannot be structured as an umbrella.  This is permitted (at least in the UK): http://www.investinginfunds.org/facts-about-funds/what-are-investment-funds/authorised-funds.html 80.254.158.132 (talk) 14:42, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Umbrella Fund
Talk:Man into Wolf

message: There's an extensive article on Robert Eisler, complete with bibliography, but no articles on his books. So I wrote a piece for Man Into Wolf, his magnum opus. He's highly regarded in certain circles and I was surprised when I read the book to find that he's really a psuedoscientist. I think that's the value of having a pseudoscience category; systematically eliminating articles from it is a mistake. awins 12:57, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pakenham Secondary College

message: I understand how section names like "notable achievements" get into articles due to AfD being win/lose on establishing WP:Notability, but surely there are far better ways to present this information in flowing prose about sport, mental health and youth culture?Garrie 21:11, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I realise that I have comprehensively failed the 'flowing prose' test but I think the new headings are somewhat better. TerriersFan 22:37, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedit? 

message: Lachlan Hansen, Australian Rules Footballer for the North Melbourne Football Club, No. 3 draft pick 2006
Newzillind (talk) 15:49, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi there, I've declined this request as no request has been made to edit the article. Please make sure that in any future requests that you make you use the format "Please change x to y", otherwise it can be difficult for us to find out exactly what edit you would like to be made to the page. Thanks, Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) -  18:47, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Newzillind, 1 June 2010
Talk:Itzik Zohar

message: == Conflict between [[ma'abarot] and Itzik Zohar articles regarding whether they were still around in the 1970's ==
The article on ma'abarot says the last one closed in 1963.
The article on Itzik Zohar says he was born in 1970 and grew up in a ma'abara.
Obviously, one of these most be wrong and should be corrected.  I don't know which.  But they cannot both be right.
71.109.149.195 (talk) 07:06, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: The article on ma'abarot says the last one closed in 1963.
The article on Itzik Zohar says he was born in 1970 and grew up in a ma'abara.
Obviously, one of these most be wrong and should be corrected.  I don't know which.  But they cannot both be right.
71.109.149.195 (talk) 07:06, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict between [[ma'abarot] and [[Itzik Zohar]] articles regarding whether they were still around in the 1970's 