Talk:Kuznetsov-class aircraft carrier

message: The Kuznetsov and Varyag are two very unique vessels, and compared to the US supercarriers most people know very little about them. This is our chance to change that mates. I'd like to see a subsection on it's complement of aircraft (one regiment of Su-33 Flankers, Kamov Helix helicopters. It should be noted, before anyone goes off and says anything about the Yak-141, that the Freestyle never entered service. 
Your time and effort is much appreciated, and good luck! (USMA2010 05:11, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs Improvement

message: :Add any additional comments:
Please hold the discussion at the related page: Talk:Soviet aircraft carrier Kuznetsov#Discussion
Hmm...I dont know that much about russian carriers but dosent the 72 meters beam sound a little oversized? The Nimitz-class is only 40 meters.
Walle83 16:05, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Much of the text in this article has been copied from http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/kuznetsov/
The reference is acknowledged, but cut-and-pasting the text is not justified.
I am rewriting to eliminate all this copied text.
--Rich Rostrom (Talk) 06:41, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article contains copyrighted text. 

message: An image used in this article, File:Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrier bridge.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrier bridge.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Article name should be amended (reverted) to read "Kuznetsov class aircraft carrier".  Justification ofr change is that the class name should be simple and succinct.  Also "Admiral Kuznetsov" is not the ship's actual name.  The actual name is: "Fleet Admiral of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov".  Clearly this is too long for a class name.  Let's keep it simple and just go with "Kuznetsov".  There are no ambiguity issues in using this name.Федоров (talk) 00:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amend article name to "Kuznetsov class aircraft carrier" 

message: Not to ask anything too arcane, but what does it use for fuel?  Thanks. CountMacula (talk) 02:58, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: We could use much more detail on the boilers in general. I understand that they're both somewhat unusual, and a problem in service. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:14, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fuel 

message: There's a nice photo of the Kuznetsov being escorted by HMS Liverpool earlier this year available under the OGL if someone wants to do the honours - search http://www.defenceimagery.mod.uk/ for 45153590.jpg. Shows the skijump particularly well. 86.25.7.71 (talk) 22:04, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: The Liaoning is listed here as a Admiral Kuznetsov-class aircraft carrier. It is not. The Hull was originally destened to be a Admiral Kuznetsov-class aircraft carrier but it never was. The Chinese carrier, the Liaoning, is not a Admiral Kuznetsov-class aircraft carrier. The current wording in the article makes out that the PLA has an Admiral Kuznetsov-class aircraft carriers where as the Liaoning's has be extensively modified and now bears little reselbelence to the original Soviet class design. Rincewind42 (talk) 13:34, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liaoning 

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/kuznetsov/
*:Triggered by \bnaval-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:43, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: The section about the ship's boiler reliability is incorrect. The boilers is actually one of the ship's advantages. The boilers is of very robust manufacture that allows the ship to burn a variety of fuel types in case of fuel shortage, including waste.
This is also used to tactical advantage, in which case oiled fibre is burned to create a heated smokescreen to disrupt IR detection and tracking accuracy. This can be easily observed when the ship passes close to nations displaying hostile intent and/or rhetoric.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.182.9.198 (talk) 14:37, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Information About Reliability 

message: Any comment purporting to ascribe Soviet motives for the typing of the KUZNETSOV as an aircraft-carrying cruiser and such comment made without the citation of any sources should not be included in the Wiki article.  On this basis I continue to delete unsourced comments until there is: 1) a source cited and/or 2) the comment is worded as conjecture.Moryak (talk) 18:28, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type justification 

message: It makes sense to include Liaoning, or Type 001 class, because the vessel was technically built as a Kuznetsov class vessel, the Varyag.
Shandong Type 002 class, while derived from the Kuznetsov, is not formally part of the class and should not be treated as one.
For example in Wikipedia the Japanese missile destroyer classes Maya and Atago are acknowledged to be derived from the Kongou class, but each occupy their own article. Chokoladesu (talk) 13:48, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove Shandong 002 from article. 

message: Have a look at the photos, Wikipedia article on Istanbul ,
The ship looks to tall to go under some of the bridges,  I don't think you will see it in the Black sea supporting the attack against Ukraine Sudzydoogiedawg (talk) 12:26, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Istanbul bridges 

message: The Soviet Navy does not exist anymore so should we add "former" to it in "Operators" in the infobox? Or "historical" or something else? Poopykibble (talk) 23:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add "former" to soviet navy in operators 

message: It appears based on content from the page for the MiG-29K that they are being used on the Kuznetsov class as of at least 2016.  Is anyone aware if the MiG-29K is not in use, has replaced the Su-33, or coexists with it?  It's pretty minor overall but looks like it may need some updating. Mrobinson1997 (talk) 06:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Air Wing update needed