Talk:Mary Sue

message: This archetype is also known as The Omnicompetent Woman, the feminine form of The Omnicompetent Man.
Both are descendants of the more classical Demi-God/dess archetype. --Studio 126 (talk) 18:05, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Source? —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 19:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also Known As... 

message: Villain Sues are counterpart of Mary Sues who do malicious deeds as a fictional canon villain. 136.158.59.157 (talk) 03:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Source? —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 19:32, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Villain Sue? 

message: I agree it's a good fit for the article to explain the phenomenon's history and origin, but surely the copyright is owned by Paula Smith or the Menagerie group. Heaven knows I'm no expert on copyright practice on WP, but I wouldn't say that "short quotations" at WP:COPYPASTE applies here. Or... maybe the fanzine was published under a free license, or the copyright has expired early? I wouldn't know, so that's why I'm asking.
And while on the subject... if the text is free to use, surely its illustration is too and can be included for this article? Just a thought. Gaioa (T C L) 07:56, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, I've removed the full-text transcription. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 19:28, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  How come we can include the full text of 'A Trekkie's Tale'? Isn't it copyrighted? 

message: Star Trek contains examples of a slow Mary Sue where special talents are added to a character by successive writers to provide a plot twist (or a kind of Deus Ex Machina rescue as noted below). TV series typically have multiple writers, some of whom only work on one or two episodes. In the last episode of Season 1 of The Original Series, Spock's blindness is suddenly reversed by the revelation that Vulcans have a nictitating membrane. Note McCoy's cynical comment "he'd turn up with something like that":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQH-jGSD_ks (see Operation_--_Annihilate!) Martindo (talk) 21:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: "Spock's blindness is suddenly reversed by the revelation that Vulcans have a nictitating membrane" That is not a talent, nor something specific to Spock as a character. It is a matter of the physiology of his species. I don't see much of a relation to the Mary Sue concept. By the way, deus ex machina plots in ancient Greek tragedy typically involved the actual intervention on one or more deities. Not convenient coincidences. Dimadick (talk) 20:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Spock was the only Vulcan among the recurrent characters in TOS, it's reasonable to say that"suddenly revealed" traits were perceived as his character development by the audience. It was a simple trick of writers, leading in this episode to a KIND of deus ex machina (assuming the writer is a "god" who rescued him). The Vulcan mind meld was another trait "suddenly" added to his repertoire, in the Horta episode IIRC. In contrast, Kirk isn't the smartest guy in the crew, doesn't always win fistfights, and often refuses to be a team player. What exactly is the set of "always desirable traits" (typical of the Mary Sue concoction) that would apply to him? Martindo (talk) 02:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: In Kirk's case, the "desirable traits" seem to be that he is irresistible to women (numerous love interests), fearless, a supposedly brilliant strategist, and able to consinstently outwit or intimidate opponents. Personally, I liked the original Star Trek Series but I found Kirk to be a rather annoying depiction of machismo. Dimadick (talk) 07:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: How exactly are those traits typical of a Mary Sue character? He is definitely unlike James Bond, whose set goes way beyond suave: skilled at numerous languages (no for Kirk), superb at unarmed combat (a weak maybe for Kirk), adept at using special devices (minimal evidence for Kirk, if any), excellent memorization ability (no evidence for Kirk that I can recall), and at ease pretending to be someone else in order to gather info (Kirk, or at least Shatner, didn't blend in at all in the episode where they infiltrated leaders of a mafia planet in Season 2 A Piece of the Action). Martindo (talk) 08:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spock, not Kirk 

message: I suggest mentioning the protagonist of The Pursuit of Happyness (2006) as a Marty Stu character. He is a victim of undeserved misfortune which seriously impacts his life, but he does not seem to have any visible internal flaw.—Anita5192 (talk) 15:59, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there an independent, published source that says as much? Otherwise this analysis would be original research. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 19:29, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chris Gardner in ''[[The Pursuit of Happyness]]'' 

message: I've been reading sci-fi including fan fiction for over 30 years, me Da started back in the late 50's, early 60's. The Mary Sue characters certainly were not limited to the female gender, but they early on radiated out from the crowd, they were the most beautiful woman ever to be saved and could instantaneously use quantum mechanics to calculate how to save the planet. My dad talked about this many years before the term was coined.
The current article holds "Media-studies researcher Christine Scodari says there is a tendency within slash fandom to label major female characters such as Nyota Uhura in the 2009 film Star Trek as "Mary Sues", because of a perception that development of the female character takes away screen time from male characters."
I searched through academic source for expanded media studies research by Christine Scodari, I was left disappointed, this article implies some sort of gendered ideal behind Mary Sue. I don't have the understanding to improve this page properly but when it has "development of the female character takes away screen time from male characters", I know it is in desperate need of revision. BeardedChimp (talk) 03:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Scodari is describing a perception among sci-fi fans, not the reality. Wikipedia articles are based on published, reliable sources such as , not user's personal experiences. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 15:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overtly self referential fan fiction community comments.