lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Felixstowe Fury

message: Both versions of Rolls Royce Eagle engines are described as "334 hp (249 kW)", but with the later versions being "more powerful". Is one of the sets of horsepower/wattage figures wrong?
It would be great to have an image of this aircraft. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 09:29, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More powerful engines 

message: Although listed as J.F.Arnold, the correct name is J.F. Armitt
Refer to the Casualty card in the RAF Museum online Archive, particularly the back
Armitt ADM273 card in the National Archives is reference ADM 273/15/124Airhistory (talk) 18:26, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for noticing that. I found it was reported in Flight at the time so used that.  GraemeLeggett (talk) 18:37, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crew members on the last flight 

message: As the Fury was built at Felixstowe we have a reliable reference the it was Delivered to Felixstowe 31 October 1918. Does anybody know where it was actually built and is the 31 October date just the hand-over date to the Ministry/Air Force. MilborneOne (talk) 18:53, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, does this mean that the people who constructed the hull and then assembly it, then handed it over to the "ministry" for testing and it is likely that the boat never actaully moved very far when it was "delivered". ? MilborneOne (talk) 19:22, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems the base had its own boat builders and aircraft engineers, more likely the delivery was a hand over effectively. I also heard Rolls-Royce had a section there, but this is not verified. British Anzani offices were just up the road from the former site, but I do not know the history behind this - see Anzani Avenue.80.229.34.113 (talk) 19:57, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Construction
Talk:Circular line (New Taipei)

message: Should this article be merged with Line 6, Taipei Metro? -David Baron (talk) 18:13, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm moving this page to Circular Line (Taipei Metro). Please merge Line 6, Taipei Metro into Circular Line (Taipei Metro) after the move is complete. Thanks. Szqecs (talk) 13:30, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

text: NVM I did it myself. Szqecs (talk) 17:17, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Line 6 article 

message: We need a map for this article. – Kaihsu (talk) 09:20, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map needed
Talk:Smalleye smooth-hound

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 08:52, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Lamba people

message: The term "tribe" as used by Westerners to describe African ethnic groups is inappropriate. It connotes "primitive" and other pejorative racial ideas. This is true in spite of the fact that some Africans continue to use the word "tribe" when communicating in English, which is not their mother tongue. They are using it in their own context without the "pejorative" baggage that the word has when used by Westerners. The complete explanation is at: 'Talking About Tribe," <http://www.africaaction.org/bp/ethall.htm>.
I couldn't figure out at first how to change the name of "Lamba (tribe)" so I tried unsuccessfully to create a new "Lamba" article and proceeded to screw things up.Kjmorris (talk) 00:42, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:SkySails

message: The current version of the article is certainly a lot like an advert.  Tempshill (talk) 05:42, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Advert-like

message: I just added the German article to Duolingo for translation see here. It can take anywhere from a few days to a few months basically depending on how interesting the article is to the community. I would recommend checking it from time to time and adding content as it is translated. Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 08:34, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation from German article 

message: The article currently sort of stops at "In early 2010, the company announced that it had sold one". Now it's almost 11 years and no updates
on this. What is the current state? Is it still functional? 2A02:8388:1604:F600:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F (talk) 10:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Ximen metro station

message: An IP has been changing content relating to Ximen Station's location and layout, and I thought I should address that here.
*Firstly, the station is a three-level station according to the source here (BL6, in Chinese): .
*Next, according to the official station page, its address is listed as on "Baoqing Rd." instead of "Zhonghua Rd."
*Lastly, Wanhua District keeps being removed, but the station does in fact lie on the border of Zhongzheng and Wanhua. The following map is harder to see, but you can clearly see the district border running over the station icon: 
If there is a reason to change any of this, please at least provide another source or discuss it here. Thanks! -Multivariable (talk) 17:16, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station layout and location 
Talk:11th Street station (Indiana)

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—41.113.169.235 (talk) 18:21, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't explained what you think is wrong with the coordinates. I've tweaked them slightly, but if you still think that there is an error, you'll need to provide a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 19:21, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Guthrie Historic District (Guthrie, Oklahoma)

message: Photos and/or photo uploads are needed.
*HABS photos may be available for some building in this district.
*Many NRHP photos linked in article are taken by Susan Kline, who may be a NPS employee, hence would be public domain and can be used.
*New photos would be helpful.
:Deleted photo request banner and have linked some photos from Wikipedia Commons. Bruin2 (talk) 14:50, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: This article meets the requirements for Class C I have made this change for WP:Oklahoma.Bruin2 (talk) 14:50, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Article reclassification
Talk:Crown Books

message: This article is 50% larger than that of its much larger competitor B. Dalton, Bookseller. One wonders if all the names (including those who opened each store) are necessary.
The article does not appear to be neutral. It uses words such as "fortunately" and "hounded."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:3E0B:BA00:1501:7F08:4812:646D (talk) 23:37, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too long, not neutral 
Talk:Airbus Corporate Jets

message: I improved the text for the A380 as the previous entry did not make much sense, but I did not appreciate being reverted with the comment If you think its badly written, improve it, but do not remove cited statements. as I had re-written it and the cited references were not particularly relevant. Although note that the references used have nothing to do with the Prestige.  I replaced This extraordinary large jet has been currently ordered just once with One executive variant of the Airbus A380 has been ordered. No woffle just a plain factual statement. The space.com reference quotes the number ordered . It has two full decks in the widest cabin as standard, and as a unique feature even the cargo-deck is high enough to be partly usable as a third deck. which I replaced with the multi-deck configuration allows a number of different VIP configurations to be fitted. The first quote is based on the references which describe the standard A380 not the prestige. My change was to make a relevant comment on the prestige. The Flying Palace quote really needs a more official reference and it not really appropriate for a section header. Note that WP:HEAD advises against using links in headers. Your comments welcome MilborneOne (talk) 12:39, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[A380]]
Talk:Joseph-Beth Booksellers

message: Not sure is this is in the scope of the article, but I was in the Jo-Beth's at Legacy Village yesterday and the entire CD section has been removed.  All that remained was a lonely box of closeout discs, and a small display of the new Beatles CDs.THD3 (talk) 16:13, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Recorded music selection
Talk:Austro-Polish War

message: In the article:
"Polish forces took the major cities of Lubin (14 May), ..."
I believe that should be Lublin, not Lubin. Other towns listed are close to Lublin and Lublin is on the eastern side of Vistula river as are Sandomierz, Zamość, and Lwów. Lubin is in western Poland.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slawekk (talk • contribs) 16:53, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, typo corrected, thanks for noticing it.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  17:55, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lublin

message: More Polish propaganda. What a bonus Wikipedia has been to them. In legal terms Poland did not exists as an independent national entity at this time so it was NOT the Polish-Austrian War at all. It was a part of the continuing conflict between the Austrian Empire and Napoleon. 81.131.121.246 (talk) 12:43, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Anon's rant
Talk:Sunny Sweeney

message: To the person who keep reverting other editors' edits, please take note on the guidelines on biography WP:BLP that the article should be written on a neutral point of view, have a source supporting the content, and should not contain original research.  Also note that when you are removing sourced content, please try to explain why you are removing them. Hzh (talk) 09:48, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content dispute 

message: do you have a source for the birthdate? This information has previously been objected via OTRS, so unless there's a solid source it shouldn't be included per WP:DOB. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 13:57, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate
Talk:Fountain of Eternal Life

message: Well fellow wikipedians, a lot of good images (opinion) are getting flushed down to toilet these days.  Is it really making wikipedia a better, or more legal place?  Not in my eyes, but I am now starting to remove all my sculpture images (several hundred?) because I'd rather do it myself than have someone else do it.  Carptrash (talk) 01:24, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article states: "Four granite carvings, representing the geographic civilizations of the world, are placed around the sphere."
But which four civilizations are these?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.109.239.218 (talk) 04:53, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which 4 civilizations?
File talk:Soil profile.png

message: B Horizon 
the B horizon is the subsoil.sub.subsoil is made up mostly of clay, small pieces of weathered rocks and minerals.
the B horizon gets its nutrients from horizon A then horizon C gets all its nutrients from B.  (hopefully leaching will not occur or all the plants will die.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.54.182.62 (talk) 22:57, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Scotichronicon

message: "Queen Scota's name means "blossom" in Irish and Scottish Gaelic. Scotti was once a synonym for Irish, indicating that they (Irish and Scots) are "people of the blossom," or descendants of Queen Scota"
The word  for 'blossom' in  both Irish and Scots Gaelic is bhlàth
As such,  unless the languages have changed radically, the sentences quoted above would appear to be erroneous.
If this is an assertion of fact, it needs to be backed up with a credible reference. 
If this is simply an assertion made in the 'Scotichronicon,' that should be made clear.
JF42 (talk) 21:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scota's name means "blossom" 

message: Hi, y'all!  I found an English translation of Bower's Latin story; done by A I Jones of the Latin text given in Child, III, p 41, via https://d.lib.rochester.edu/teams/text/bower-continuation-of-scotichronicon. I need an appropriate landing spot for my wikilink from A Gest of Robyn Hode#External_evidence. Should be posted within the next week or so. Ta-ta for now!  --AnalyticalHistoricalHobbyist (talk) 16:15, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: UPDATE1 - Hi, y'all! Getting started ... I am also re-arranging the order of the sections so that the article flows better. Tally-ho!  --AnalyticalHistoricalHobbyist (talk) 17:04, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Will be adding a new section re Bower's Robin Hood story
Talk:Tonalism

message: Contemporary tonalist painters should be included in this article. There are such painters who are famous, good, and worthy of mention here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Msft watch (talk • contribs) 05:57, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There are fine contemporary painters indeed. But the article refers to a movement and its associated artists from a particular era. As in the article on Impressionism, a list of artists is best limited to those who were most important to the movement during it origins and most influential period, and does not include subsequent practitioners. One of the benefits of adhering to this is that it eliminates the possibilities for promotion. JNW (talk) 12:27, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

text: I really have to knock off for the day, but I'll try a brief reply now: I agree re: the permanence of good painting, regardless of style, but not for the Tonalism article--its reach as a movement really is circumscribed by the dates of the introduction to the article. A think a 'later' section would look tacked on, and raise questions of promotional motives. There are many good and successful plein air painters today, but I think one would be compelled to stick with the most famous and successful ones, like Rackstraw Downes or Antonio Lopez Garcia-- they don't conform to the American template of rapid outdoor painting, but they are acknowledged modern masters who paint outside from life. That's what I mean by notability, artists with museum shows and major monographs. Finally, though I know something about this, mine ain't the final word, so it might be interesting to have a few other art contributors weigh in. Probably best for us to talk on the Tonalism discussion page. Thanks for dropping a line. JNW (talk) 05:46, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is, incidentally, a fine show right now at the Clark Art Institute in Williamstown, Mass, which focuses on this theme , and features Whistler, Chase, Inness, Dewing, and others. JNW (talk) 18:42, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No contemporary artists or information?
Talk:Iron Mountain (riverboat)

message: I have removed this ship from Ghost ship and propose to remove her from Category:Ghost ships as she was, and was claimed to be, neither a mysteriously-appearing ghostly vessel like the Flying Dutchman nor a real derelict like the Marie Celeste. If she had disappeared, she would belong in Category:Missing ships.  As she did not disappear, I suggest that she belongs in Category:Shipwrecks. Alekksandr (talk) 18:45, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Ghost Ship?
Talk:Chevrolet 210

message: I like most of the photographs included with this article, as they represent the car as it was sold. However, a couple of them should be removed as they depict the customized version. Yes, I know some people like the shape of the mid-1950s Chevrolets but not the bland interiors, and while that may be understandable, such pictures do not represent the car for an encyclopediac article. Perhaps if someone were to include them in a documented section about people using the car's body for a customzing project, that would be OK, but unless that comes about, I think the pictures of the customized cars should be removed. [[Briguy52748 (talk) 01:23, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photographs

message: this is the base for the Project X car--109.54.201.175 (talk) 19:51, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Project X

message: I don't know if Chevrolet has formally list their model name as Two-Ten instead of 210 here. Rjluna2 (talk) 12:24, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  210 versus Two-Ten
Talk:The Dead Guy

message: I am now rewriting the page so it has plot and characters, and a brief overview.  Sorry for the delay!  Thanks, Aggiew (talk) 01:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: I was a bit confused about the hangon process, but I am requesting to keep this page now that it is a full article with an external source leading to an acutal copy of the script.  I realize that The Dead Guy is a new play, but it is gaining popularity and I want people to be able to quickly research it.Aggiew (talk) 02:27, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keeping this Page Up
Talk:Group army (military unit)

message: The word "" in Simplified Chinese refers to Combined Arms Armies of the Soviet Army like 6th Army (Soviet Union)(), or Armies of the US Army or other nations like 6th Army (Wehrmacht) (). So the  of PLA should also be translated as Armies instead of Group Armies or Army Groups.
During its formation in 1985, PLA "s" might be composed of 5 or even 6 divisions, as big as a Soviet Army combined arms army. Then they get smaller and smaller with the downsizing of PLA ground forces.
The word "集团军" in Chinese means "a group("集团") of Corps("军")", as Armies that day were composed of several Corps. 
The word "" in Simplified Chinese refers to Corps, like V Corps (United States)(). The "s" before 1985 are actually Army Corps() stead of Armies. In 1985 all remaining Army Corps are converted and renamed as Armies, so the Relationship between Army Corps and Armies in PLA is as same as that in Soviet Army after 1957.
There were real Army Groups in the history of PLA ground force, as . It is a military formation composing of three or more corps, and under the command of Field Army(). 
So MY SUGGESTION is just forget about all those silly translations, and:
*Use Field Army for "";
*Use Army Group for "";
*Use Army for "";
*Use Army Corps for "";
*Use Corps for "";
regards, Nikolai Ezhov 13:21, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: The ''Group Army'' or ''Army Group'' is a Terrible Translation Mistake

message: PLA is not my strong point, but some of you may be interested in this article: http://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2089218/xi-jinping-plans-first-shake-chinese-army-corps-names CsikosLo (talk) 12:18, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restructuring of Corps in 2017 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/RC-0722

message: User:RC-0722
    run at Fri Jan 18 02:00:10 2008 GMT
Mainspace              302
Talk:                  69
User talk:             83
User:                  46
Wikipedia talk:        2
Wikipedia:             10
avg edits per page     4.16
earliest               00:36, 5 November 2007
number of unique pages 123
total                  512
2007/11  167
2007/12  165
2008/1   180
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes
edits without an edit summary)
             Mainspace
81 Star Wars: Battlefront II
23 2007 New England Patriots season
23 Tim Tebow
16 Larry Johnson (American football)
12 LaDainian Tomlinson
8  Spider-Man
7  Sonic the Hedgehog (character)
6  Clone Trooper
6  Star Wars
6  Bill Cosby
5  Super Smash Bros.
5  2007 New York Giants season
5  Marvin Harrison
4  Christmas
4  The Catch (American football)
               Talk:
20 Star Wars: Battlefront II
14 2007 New England Patriots season
6  Tom Brady
4  Hulk (comics)
4  Super Smash Bros. Brawl
3  Clone Trooper
2  Star Wars galaxy
2  Tim Tebow
2  Wii
    User:
37 RC-0722
9  Burner0718
    User talk:
34 Burner0718
12 Tommy Boy
4  Wknight94
3  71.57.32.24
3  GlassCobra
3  Jj137
3  88.7.105.91
2  Pats1
2  RC-0722
2  99.247.120.178
2  B
2  Pigman
2  TonyTheTiger
           Wikipedia:
3 Requests for adminship/RC-0722
2 Good article nominations
           Wikipedia talk:
2 WikiProject National Football League
If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at User talk:Interiot
.
Based directly on these URLs: [1]
* The edit count was retrieved from this link at 02:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for RC-0722
Talk:Chinese women in space

message: — Assignment last updated by 1namesake1 (talk) 00:25, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: WRIT 340 for Engineers - Fall 2023 - 668386
Talk:Kaituozhe (rocket family)

message: Is this 'kāi tuò zhě' ? That doesn't seem to mean "explorer", rather, it seems to mean "pioneer".
There's a Kaituozhe-1 at Genius Hi-Tech UAV which is a drone, instead of this rocket. 
-- 70.52.11.217 (talk) 06:16, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: From the other Chinese space articles here on WP, this seems to be "开拓者", so pioneer, and not explorer -- 70.52.11.217 (talk) 08:29, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: 開拓者 / 开拓者 / kāi tuò zhě
Talk:Spoofed URL

message: The strongest qualities of this article is how the lack of bias throughout and use of clear information. Someone who has no idea what a "Spoofed URL" is could come in and immediately learn the key points. The structure flows well for a reader with what could be considered the more important topics on the top. Some of the things that can be improved are maybe a little mores structure inside each of the subtopics. Some of the topics like prevention bring up good points, but it could be improved if it showed each possible prevention technique under a bullet-point or highlighted. Other than that however there is not much else you can find wrong with it the information found is very useful.[User:Ryan.stern12|Ryan.stern12]] (talk) 11:24, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer review

message: Say how  is accomplished. What is the method used? Jidanni (talk) 02:06, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Method 

message: I find a common attribute to computer illiterate persons is that when told to go to a certain website, they always type in "www.(website).com", and have no understanding of top level domains, automatic-searching address bars, and not needing to type "www". These people are much more susceptible to spoofed URLs. TheOtherSiguy (talk) 13:15, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  computer illiteracy and URL spoofing 

message: There is a dead link on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spoofed_URL#Phishing near citation number 9.
old link: http://www.dspblackrock.com/investor-centre/dspbr-online/dspbr-online-security-tips/phishing-spoofing-vishing.aspx
I have an article explaining about Phishing & Spoofing and how to protect online users from it.
New link: https://www.https.in/blog/phishing-and-spoofing-your-guide-to-protect-against-them/
Can author/verified member make this change ?
--Kiran247 (talk) 09:45, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need a minor change in Dead links in Phishing Section
Talk:Long March 2C

message: The current info-box image is for the original version of the 2C from the 90s (35m length, tiny fairing).  There were two evolutions of the 2C since then: a version with stretched 2nd stage used for commercial Iridium launches from 1997 to 2004, and the current version with all stages stretched and a much larger 3.35m diameter fairing.  We should update the image to match the current offering. --IanOsgood (talk) 18:06, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need updated image