lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hillhead High School

message: Hi, I dont know who it was but on the October 13th clean-up page; it wasn't on it. So I re-listed it as October 21st. -- Kilo-Lima 11:30, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I cleaned this up a good bit; any further improvement will require the help of someone with actual knowledge of the school.  One important question: Is there a reason that we're listing a "recurring alcoholic" (Tristan Robinson) as a notable alumnus?  I didn't remove him because I don't know if maybe he's a local quasi-celebrity or something, but I suspect that he needs to be removed, particularly given the mention of vandalism below.  Anyone know any more about it? --edi 21:45, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Aaaaaand now we have two alcoholics listed with the recent addition of "Kinnon Clark, resident alcoholic".  What's up with this??  I'd appreciate any information anyone can give.  Thanks. --edi 15:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Article is currently protected due to vandalism. Iolakana•T 18:01, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Protected

message: A good start. You need some more content, pics and references to advance to a B. Mid importance because of the interesting alumni. Dahliarose 11:54, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: No longer present at the school, can someone please remove it? --217.42.234.252 (talk) 17:19, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Modern Studies
Talk:Luan Krasniqi

message: I have a couple of problems with this article. One is that it's not that neutral in tone. The other is that the underlying text seems to have been taken wholesale from here. Mayhaps someone could sit down and rework the text to a better standard?
Tabercil
----------------------------------
Of what Dardania today is writer of this article speaking?? I'll rename that to Kosovo/Kosova... 
"He has often said that he had a happy and active childhood, growing up in Junik, Kosova (Ancient Dardania, during Ancient Illryian Albanian Empire)"
...what does that have to do with him?? totally unnecessary... and of what Illyrian Albanian Empire are you speaking??????
maybe the roman province Dardania?! at that time Albanians were a tribe living in the area of northern Greece...
this article is a clear propaganda and it should be written again or deleted...
----------------------------------
I edited the article so it has more connections with reality now...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.1.116.118 (talk) 08:41, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Luan Krasniqi kommt aus dem Ks=Kosovo ein starker albaner mit sehr viel mut und stolz er besiegte viele gegener aber wir hofen das er es schaft doch ein herausfordere ist star zu stark Wladimir Klitschko ist sehr stark und Champion obwolhl ´wir lieber Krasniq heten Ole of Ks OLe  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.108.177.91 (talk) 23:40, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  aus welchen land kommt krasniqi ? 
Talk:The 9th Company

message: Anyone know where to find details on the real story behind 9th company? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Henrylee100 (talk • contribs) 11:43, 21 October 2005
Type in "battle for hill 3234" in the seach engine, that should solve your problem buddy ;)
(1sttomars 01:53, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Real Story

message: The wikipedia article about the battle says that
"The Soviet forces sustained 37 casualties (out of a force of 39 men), including 9 men killed and 28 injured"
Which is right?--Roece 08:45, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  battle for hill 3234 

message: Characters, storyline etc? This article needs more work. Is the Russian version any more fleshed out?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.10.195.188 (talk) 04:25, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synopsis? 

message: The "paratroopers" do not receive any apparent jump training. Is that historical, or omitted from the movie for reasons of time perhaps? Varlaam (talk) 16:52, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paratroopers 

message: Do we know what nationality that character is likely to be? Kazakh? Kalmyk? Varlaam (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There were several. Pinochet was Chechen (he said he was Muslim from Grozny). 'Khokhol' is common slur for Ukrainians. Oriental looking guy's ethnicity was not mentioned. Or at least I didn't catch it. Errarel (talk) 15:10, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Soviet non-Russian 

message: "In reality, the story was quite accurate as well. "
This line strikes anyone else as weird? I remember it being "In reality, x and y happened"
When was this added/changed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.91.109.191 (talk) 19:27, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  text 

message: The end credit states the battle took place on Jan 8 1989... When the real battle happened on Jan 8 1988.. surprised no one else has pointed this out yet..  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.26.41.19 (talk) 00:54, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The US Version? 

message: The first sentence states that this is a: 
"The 9th Company (Russian: 9 Рота) is a 2005 Russian–Finnish–Ukrainian film." 
What was the Finnish involvement ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.150.16.201 (talk) 15:29, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Finnish company Matila Röhr Productions was involved. According to credits Ilkka Matila was responsible for Visual Effects, financed by Finnish Film Foundation. Errarel (talk) 16:02, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finland ? 

message: Lester W. Grau wrote a book entitled "The Bear went over the Mountain: Soviet Combat Tactics in Afghanistan".  I think that needs to be added in the see also section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.180.108.177 (talk) 02:05, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional connections?
Talk:Southport and St Anne's lifeboats disaster

message: I don't understand this article. The title seems to imply that both the Southport and St Anne's lifeboats were lost, but all the article says about the St. Annes lifeboat is that it launched, rowed out to five hundred yards, and then sailed to a point two miles off Southport.
The article clearly states that 13 crew of the Southport lifeboat were lost. And later that 28 lifeboatmen were lost in total. And the quotation does sound like it is talking about a different incident to the one that hit the Southport boat. So it does sound likely a second boat was lost, but nowhere does the article say this. It is almost as if there is some text missing.
I'm adding the template cleanup to the article, to try and get this resolved. -- Chris j wood 11:44, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah. Having reviewed the history, I understand. Back in April Avriette was doing cleanup work on this article, and changed the order of two paragraphs. This orphaned the quote, which was intended to continue the story of the St Annes lifeboat, and made it look like it was talking about the Southport boat (or even the Lytham one that survived). I've changed the para ordering back to the original, which I think makes things clearer. -- Chris j wood 11:57, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Pozzolanic ash

message: 1. I believe that the statement from the text:
"Most pozzolans, with the exception of fly ash, result in high early strength in concrete"
is wrong. If I remember well pozzolanic concrete has lower early strength than simple Portland cement and higher strength much later.
Someone please verify before correcting the entry.
Yes please change this. Kpeyn 23:13, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm merging this article (redirecting to) Pozzolana, as that is the name of the natural volcanic ash with pozzolanic properties; I've also created an article on pozzolan, which covers natural and artificial (industrial by-product) pozzolans. 
Also, see Cement chemist notation for more details about the C-S-H abbreviation. Argyriou 00:22, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merging with [[pozzolana]]
Talk:Proto-Baltic language

message: that is reconstructable by comparative method. Almost all the isoglosses that connect Baltic languages, and that leave Slavic languages aside are either 1) trivial 2) provably secondary development among already differentiated Baltic dialects after the separation of Slavic 3) do not display any kind of relative chronology (the most important thing!). There's just too much mismatch between Western and Eastern Baltic - their common ancestor must necessarily go all the way to Balto-Slavic period. No wonder this article is a two sentence stub ^_^ --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 12:04, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  There's no Proto-Baltic language 

message: Old Prussian and Latvian share more commonalities with Slavic languages than Lithuanian.
I'm guessing this means, Old Prussian and Latvian share more commonalities with Slavic languages than Lithuanian does.
But it could also be taken to mean, Old Prussian and Latvian share more commonalities with Slavic languages than with Lithuanian. Koro Neil (talk) 14:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: the correct sentence would be Old Prussian and Latvian share more commonalities with Slavic languages than Lithuanian does.--Ed1974LT (talk) 20:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguity 

message: However, critics point out that the phonology and morphology, which is shared by all known Baltic languages, is much more archaic than that of Proto-Slavic, retaining many features attributed to other attested Indo-European languages roughly 3000 years ago.
Shared archaisms are not evidence of a close taxonomic connection. Archaisms can be shared by languages quite distant from each other on a linguistic family tree. It is shared innovations that determine taxonomic relationships, particularly when they are numerous. The question is, what innovations do the Baltic languages share that can be determined to be absent in Proto-Balto-Slavic? Koro Neil (talk) 23:07, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shared archaism
Talk:History of Angola

message: Factors that led to the defeat of the Angolans? 102.146.123.155 (talk) 18:33, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Newton, Kansas

message: Please review the following:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
• Sbmeirow • Talk •  22:03, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Tips Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Annie Easley

message: As I mentioned, I have no problem with WP keeping the article, assuming that Ms. Easley is notable (which has been somewhat established.) 
I don't quite understand AAAAA's reaction to me placing the potential vanity tag on the article. The article, at the time I placed the tag, didn't make a clear case for notability/importance, however it did not appear that there was no notability whatsoever, so being unsure, I tagged it with PotentialVanity. Keep in mind that this is PotentialVanity-I wasn't sure, and the presence of the word "potential" I think is a good indicator of that. However, this seemed to stick in AAAAA's craw, as he removed the tag and seemed a bit put off in his comment on my talk page. It is somewhat funny that AAAAA makes it out as if I was trying to "destroy" his work. Firstly, because that isn't what I was trying to do (and unless I wipe his hard drive, I pretty much couldn't do, anyway) and also because another user accused me of being a Destroyer concerning another article. It is also good to keep in mind that even a well-written article, possibly the work of many hours, might be speedy deleted if it is out of place on WP. Again, the Easley article doesn't seem to be, but the fact that someone took the time to compile the info and make an article of it really means nothing in this context. (Of course, those who do so deserve credit, and if AAAAA gathered this info and posted it then credit he does deserve. I'm just saying that it's no argument against deletion.)
Thanks everyone and wikilove to all. Paul 06:26, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: AAAAA, thank you for commenting. It is both interesting and helpful to know something of the background of the article.  I appreciate the contributions you have made to Wikipedea. Paul's actions have increased the awareness of the Annie Easley article, and THAT IS A GOOD THING. I count six edits by three different editors since Paul's RfC. I would still like to add something of the context, e.g., Jim Crow segregation, etc. On the other hand, Paul might have used the importance tag as [User:Mendel] did, or left a message on your talk page or the Annie Easley talk page, and that would have been A COURTESY that would have been appreciated, I think. That said, Wikipedea needs vigorous editors AND vigorous contributors and I hope that we all appreciate one another.  -Walter Siegmund 14:48, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Response to AAAAA 

message: This source was given for Ms. Easley's birth info.
*
That source has this information wrong. Her married name was Easley - not her birth name.
--Lightbreather (talk) 16:54, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preserving source
Talk:Maltesers

message: A friend recently suggested that you can’t melt a Malteser in your mouth and I think you can. Thoughts ? 2A02:C7C:E136:9B00:342A:57D0:DE7A:DAFC (talk) 14:45, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Melt in your mouth 

message: Not impressed with your Maltesers advert.  I find it disgusting and stupid, what has an elderly man eating Maltesers anything to do with advertising Maltesers would actually put me off buying Maltesers again. 2A02:C7F:D5C:B900:7588:D80F:FC75:6ACD (talk) 16:25, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maltesers advert
Talk:White Center, Washington

message: From the moniker article, "moniker" is an adopted self-reference and "nickname" is given by others. It seems unlikely that White Center leaders adopted the name for themselves, but there are various theories as to its origin (see, e.g., the Rat City Rollergirls FAQ). Lupinelawyer 13:57, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rat City nickname 

message: Can someone provide a source for the assertion that "White Center is King County's most crime-ridden neighborhood."? That way we can monitor it and pass along the title to other deserving neighborhoods as such statistics change. Lupinelawyer 13:57, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the reference. If someone has RECENT information about crime in this area (and preferably from a reliable source, not from an editorial written by a high school student), please add it. DFS (talk) 03:43, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crime Stats 

message: White Center Jubilee Days is a celebration of community held every summer in White Center. It is the result of thousands of hours of volunteer labor and generous donations from the local business community and others. This locally run festival has roots stretching back more than 80 years and has been appearing in roughly its present from since the early 1980's. It features a two day street fair (on the third weekend in July), parade, golf tournament (on the second weekend in July) and carnival. The street fair includes free entertainment on two stages, beer garden, kids center and street vendors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.31.53 (talk) 07:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jubilee Days 

message: Any explanation for the sudden, and enormous, collapse in population over the last ten years?FrFintonStack (talk) 19:03, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Population collapse
Talk:Coercive monopoly/references

message: This Talk page is for quotations and citations. Please include a reference for each quotation. Not everything on this page will be added to the coercive monopoly article, but every reference and quotation in the article should be listed here. This page is not for discussion. Please place all discussion on the Talk:Coercive monopoly page. Thank you. -- BBlackmoor (talk) 14:01, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Marines

message: ===Which countries to include?===
Currently the By country section includes countries that don't have marines but have army units with the amphibious warfare role. They are not actually marines so why keep them in this article? They could be moved to the List of marines and naval infantry forces article which could be renamed as List of amphibious forces. Dreddmoto (talk) 15:59, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Those in the amphibious role are mostly there because of how they're treated (analogue). I think the article is fine, but I'm open to suggestions to make it better even though I just drop references for stuff I'm able to stumble on.. Ominae (talk) 16:46, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  By country 

message: Currently the By country section includes countries that don't have marines but have army units with the amphibious warfare role. They are not actually marines so why keep them in this article? They could be moved to the List of marines and naval infantry forces article which could be renamed as List of amphibious forces. Dreddmoto (talk) 15:59, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Those in the amphibious role are mostly there because of how they're treated (analogue). I think the article is fine, but I'm open to suggestions to make it better even though I just drop references for stuff I'm able to stumble on.. Ominae (talk) 16:46, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Which countries to include?

message: ===Which photographs to include?===
Currently, the introduction and history section include modern photographs of Spanish and Finnish marines which also appear with the country sections they portray. That is duplication. The introduction and history section could be improved if those photographs were replaced with others from wikimedia commons, like this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:USS_Wasp_Vs_HMS_Reindeer_Engaged_In_Combat.jpg or this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:160414-N-QF605-124_(26412609076).jpg Dreddmoto (talk) 22:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree to replace duplicate image on lead/introduction section. Personally, I like the first image as it describe on of the role of Marines to board enemy vessel during combat. Ckfasdf (talk) 22:29, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photographs 

message: Currently, the introduction and history section include modern photographs of Spanish and Finnish marines which also appear with the country sections they portray. That is duplication. The introduction and history section could be improved if those photographs were replaced with others from wikimedia commons, like this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:USS_Wasp_Vs_HMS_Reindeer_Engaged_In_Combat.jpg or this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:160414-N-QF605-124_(26412609076).jpg Dreddmoto (talk) 22:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree to replace duplicate image on lead/introduction section. Personally, I like the first image as it describe on of the role of Marines to board enemy vessel during combat. Ckfasdf (talk) 22:29, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Which photographs to include?
Talk:Cyclone Gafilo

message: Impact. Jdorje 20:26, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see Gafilo has been named as the strongest cyclone of its' basin on record, but there have been stronger - for example, Daryl-Agnielle had estimated MSLP of 885mb.--Mikoyan21 14:03, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo
Talk:Rigo Tovar

message: ... is questionably true, it lacks a single citation, and this is not noted. I've been listening to quite a bit of Texican, Norteño, banda, corridos, cumbias, etc. lately and although it is great to have my own ideas and opinions repeated, I prefer  Verifiability.  72.177.123.145 (talk) 00:40, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. If you have any sources, please update the article ... it surely needs to comply with the standards. ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 01:32, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  While every word of this article .... 
Talk:George Herbert Mead

message: I reorganized the bibliography a bit:
-Added a few books, including the important Philosophy of the Present
-Put the three most important books by Mead first
-Separated Mead's work from secondary literature
Qwerty18 04:20, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 

message: I added a bit of biographical material.
Qwerty18 04:43, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biographical Material 
Talk:Meekatharra, Western Australia

message: no railway in meekatharra anymore 124.178.175.82 22:45, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that; SatuSuro has fixed it. Hesperian 04:48, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comments

message: Wikipedia does not give advice - is there any opinion either way on the section as found - removal or re-wording?
My suggestion would be: -
Travel in the region like all outback regions of Australia requires care - check local authorities for advice and information - any thoughts? SatuSuro 03:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say remove it. An encyclopaedia could cover past incidents tracked to reliable sources, assuming they can be covered within WP:UNDUE, but the risks are not particular to this town (and it should be noted Meekatharra, Western Australia is focussed on a town). Orderinchaos 04:32, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: travel precautions
Talk:A Fall of Moondust

message: I remember this being dramatized for radio sometime in the late 1970s or early 1980s on CBC Radio or another Canadian radio station.  I don't remember exactly when or on what program or station.  Possibilities include CBS Radio Mystery Theatre (carried by CFPL London, Ontario) or even, possibly, an X-Minus One episode from the 1950s.
GBC 14:38, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Radio show

message: I seem to recall Arthur C. Clarke being interviewed by CBS News commentator Walter Cronkite on the subject of Clarke’s “A Fall of Moondust” at some point during the Apollo program missions.
I don’t recall whether a question that always occurs to me regarding this book—ergo why the moon does not, in fact, have seas of moondust as Clarke had proposed—actually took place in that interview or not.
Does anyone have any recollection of this interview?
Filmguy24p 07:43, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarke with Cronkite 

message: The section entitled "Politics" reads like a school essay has been grafted on to the article - it does not sit well with the rest of the article and is far too long and verbose in my opinion.
158.234.250.71 (talk) 18:01, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I have removed it. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 01:27, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politics section 

message: Does anyone know who currently owns the movie rights to this story?
--Xxl filip (talk) 11:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie Rights 

message: I added this into the category for 1960s science fiction novels.  Transcendentalist01 (talk) 05:11, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 

message: According to Wikipedia, it's David Tennant's Doctor who features in the episode "Midnight". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midnight_(Doctor_Who)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.174.32.152 (talk) 00:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Doctor Who?