lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:ZU-23-2

message: Would it help to comment on terminology?
ZSU = self-propelled.
ZPU = towed.
ZxU-cc-n where cc is the calibre and n the number of barrels. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bob Moffatt (talk • contribs) 17:11, 17 June 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: >The ZSU-23-2 is a two barrel, 23mm anti aircraft cannon mounted on a towed, 2 >wheeled carrage. Barrels can also be fully depressed to allow firing at ground >targets. It is effective out to 2500m at an elevation of 1500mm.
> This weapon was introduced by the Soviet Union in 1964. It was exported extensively, and there are a number of non-ex-Soviet produced versions.
The above text about ZSU-23-2 seems a description of a "vulgar" towed ZU-23-2. Besides, as far as I know ZSU-23-2 is simply a misspelling of ZU-23-2, caused by similar designations such as ZSU-23-4, ZSU-57-2. In those designations, "S" stands for "samokhodnaya" - "self-propelled". ZU-23-2 is towed and afaik doesn't have an "official" self-propelled version (although improvised versions exist, see photo in the article or here ). 
So... does anybody have any information about something oficially called ZSU-23-2 ? If not, the article needs to be fixed. Bukvoed 09:22, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the above text. If somebody has any information about variant called ZSU-23-2, please add it to the variants section. Bukvoed 12:06, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Text merged from ZSU-23-2

message: Could someone identify the anti-aircraft weapon in this photo? Thanks. --Vsion 02:55, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's ZU-23-2. Bukvoed 05:27, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo of ZU-23-2?  

message: Article says Finnish ItK 95 is often mounted on vehicle, i would personally say that it's never used from vehicle, only original model is used. That is what they train in finnish army —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.251.226.5 (talk • contribs)  — Preceding undated comment added 23:56, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Finnish ItK 95

message: Can we clarify that 2,000rpm is the rate of fire for both barrels combined, rated as a unitary system? I don't want to change it mysefl, not being 100% positive. AnnaGoFast (talk) 23:48, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rate of fire
Talk:The Guns of Navarone

message: If it is based then it should be mentioned so, if not then the article should say that this is only a fictional story set in the world war. Just to ensure that people don't get the wrong impression that there really existed a guns of navarone. tx. Idleguy 04:48, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
:Loosely, very loosely there was no operation that seemed very similar. There was an island at in the Eastern Med. that the Germans attacked at the end of 1943. It is possibly the last unambiguous German victory of the war. I found this link for Greek tourism about the Island. http://www.in2greece.com/blog/2009/02/island-of-navarone.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.119.36.242 (talk) 22:32, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this movie based on any real incident? 

message: It looks like someone only typed about half of it in. Can someone finish it?
:UnSane 17:32, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
::Done. Now you can be Sane again. Clarityfiend 07:54, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary is incomplete 

message: This appears to be substantially about the film, although leads off correctly with mention of the Novel. Maybe the Novel should become an article of it's own. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 09:23, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and started a new article for the film.  You can find it at The Guns of Navarone (film).  I am not sure if the synoposis for the novel is accurate, so other than removing the obvious film references, I will leave that as it is. Seaphoto 02:45, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Novel

message: Should it be mentioned that this movie is referenced in Pulp Ficiton?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.59.73.30 (talk) 15:07, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pulp Fiction

message: I got there from The Skatalites and expected this page to be about their song.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.179.202.23 (talk) 19:44, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The song is taken from The Guns of Navarone (film) theme and is written by Dimitri Tiomkin.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.216.9.238 (talk) 00:45, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Skatalities song? 

message: No plausible reason why "Guns of Navarone" should direct to book and not film, have therefore made this page a disambig page, linking to both book and film - PocklingtonDan 15:04, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Set up disambig
Talk:Javelin (surface-to-air missile)

message: Please check under Specifications / Weight.
Something is wrong there  (weight = 0.076m?)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.207.101.112 (talk) 09:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missile weight is wrong 

message: I know that Blowpipes were available to the mujahideen, but the Javelin? Is there a source for this information?--172.190.23.13 (talk) 04:13, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Afghanistan? 

message: this page is missing some relatively basic information, such as dates of use. Bstouttt (talk) 18:23, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  General improvements 

message: Did the Canadian Forces use the Javelin, or the Javelin S-15 aka. Starburst? Both articles seem to suggest they used that version. Maury Markowitz (talk) 11:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canada 

message: i was searching for the olympic sport. -ML 88.9.40.232 (talk) 00:41, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Try Javelin throw, or :Javelin (disambiguation) if that's not the correct one. BilCat (talk) 01:51, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambiguation page 

message: Why the map and the text have different information and doesn't Ukraine use javelins too? I would like an answer Smilecountry NL (talk) 13:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: sorry for this. Wrong article. Heh... Smilecountry NL (talk) 13:08, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Javeline operators map and text 

message: Remove reference to sold commercially unless a source is cited.
This is a military product with likely several ITAR subcomponents. The very fact that only militaries are operators should be apparent that this has not been sold commercially. Additionally, "commercial" is a very specific definition under the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 2.101 definition of commercial product. The creation and sale of the javelin is subject to the FAR, and calling any sales commercial is the dumbest thing I've read. Implying that a private citizen can buy one or repurchase one is dumb. 47.32.234.95 (talk) 20:47, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not sold commerical 

message: The S15 used an aiming unit head where the camera was replaced with HVM like laser diode projector , the missile then looked back at the the aiming unit and mainatined position in the laser grid projected by the laser diodes.
Amusingly when firing in training a javelin RF transmitter was used which would be detectable by foreign actors while the laser grid was not, concealing the actual guidance method 147.161.143.13 (talk) 15:54, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Javelin S15
Talk:Nathan Milstein

message: That last paragraph is completely subjective. On top of that, I think that most people would disagree with it.
*I thought the paragraph rather odd too.  Feel free to take it out as far as I am concerned. Indrian 03:51, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)
This isn't so much editing as pure question.  Does anyone know his instrument?  I'm not the biggest fan of his tone, but can't seem to find what kind of instrument he owned....
I tried to copy a photo of Milstein onto this article but couldn't do it. Would someone who knows what they are doing get a photo? Almost all the other violinists have photos. Milstein deserves one.
I agree with the lst unsigned comment. I tried too to copy a photo but I'm not doing that generic permissions thing correctly. I hope some more educated Wiki will get a photograph of Milstein up. Rexroad 13:16, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Leela (Doctor Who)

message: If Leela stayed on Gallifrey , that means Rose Tyler won't be the first assistant to die. Leela died in the Time War, when Gallifey was destroyed. Maybe this should be mentioned in the article? Digifiend 08:50, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, first of all, even if Leela died during the Time War, she wouldn't be the first companion to die: that dubious honour belongs to Katarina. Secondly, there's a lot of "ifs" - if she was in Gallifrey, if she was involved in the Time War... for all we know, she may not have been on Gallifrey, or that she had died before that of old age (pesky time travel). And really, if we want to talk about companions dying after the leave the Doctor, surely Jamie died a long time ago. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 10:39, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Not to mention the fact that Rose isn't dead... DrVxD (talk) 21:46, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Details... details...  Mr JM  01:28, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Leela seems to be "killed off" in the BF audio The Time Vampire but that doesn't seem to be out yet.GraemeLeggett (talk) 06:14, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 

message: Do we have to describe Leela as primitive?  She was a member of a tribe/family that fought to survive every day on the planet they lived on.  We don't tend to go around describing the Native American Indians at the time of British/US colonisation, or the Australian Aboriginals at the time of British colonisation primitive any more (it's offensive, loaded and untrue), why are we using this word to describe Leela?
Yes she didn't have the privilege of a Western education, but her education on her planet and her environment, as well as the rules for living in her tribe, were exactly what she needed to survive.  Most of us wouldn't last a day on that planet.
Bluebec (talk) 1:57, 8 January 2011 (GMT +10)
:The term is used elsewhere in describing her   GraemeLeggett (talk) 10:45, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primitive 

message: This badly needs a better image, that isn't distorted by a bunch of blown-out red.  Dozens pictures that turn up near the top of a Google Images search are better choices.  — AReaderOutThataway t/c 02:26, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better image needed 

message: I've removed the following from the page, after the mention of Jameson declining to return for Tom Baker's regeneration: "Leela was therefore written into Arc of Infinity, but Jameson proved unavailable for the role, so some of her parts of the story were assigned instead to Nyssa". This is not mentioned in the attributed source (), and with Arc having now been blu-ray released with no mention of this it seems very dubious. Of course, if anyone does have a source feel free to add it back with proper attribution. U-Mos (talk) 14:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arc of Infinity return?
Talk:Glamour photography

message: It's currently entirely unclear how this article differs in scope from Erotic photography. I'll quote the first two sentences of this article:
And here are the first two sentences from Erotic photography:
<insert "Corporate needs you to find the difference between these two pictures" meme>
In the merge discussion in 2017, User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) opposed by saying . There may be some people who conceptualize the phrase that way, but it's clear that the scope of the Erotic photography article explicitly does not include pornographic photos.
WP:NAD is very relevant here: 
I could see an argument for this existing as a separate sub-topic of Erotic photography with a scope like "Erotic photography from the mid-20th century on". But the only circumstances I could see for that being a valid split would be:
* If merging this with Erotic photography would result in an overly long article (see WP:SIZESPLIT)
* If erotic photography from this period is so conceptually coherent and conceptually different from other erotic photography that it's best treated as a separate subject.
But I don't currently see any evidence that either of these apply. Colin M (talk) 17:25, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisiting merger with [[Erotic photography]]
Talk:New York weevil

message: I think the name is Ithycerus noveboracensis but I'm not 100% sure... B kimmel 18:51, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It is indeed noveboracensis. Changes made.Dyanega 22:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  not nova
Talk:Vital

message: Is it possible these articles havn't been written yet? There must be somewhere they can redirect to... Sam Spade 19:17, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Vital sign]] and [[Vital signs (medicine)]]

message: Seriously, an antibiotic article redirects to this page which doesn't even have the meaning listed...
"vital for the function of the cell", etc.
The origin/meaning word VITAL alone isn't mentioned anywhere, ...'life', etc....
This is what you get with constant upgrades  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.64.17.186 (talk) 19:22, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is "vital" as "essential or indispensable for life"?
Talk:Quebec Boundary Extension Act, 1898

message: Wikipedia is not a repository for original text. I have moved the text to Wikisource, and linked the Wikipedia article to it. (Nice map, by the way). Ground Zero 19:25, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The maps are nice, but flawed, the Quebec boundaries never extended to the coast and Labrador boundaries were a thin strip of land along the coast, --Cloveious 06:23, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Quebec emigration

message: I moved this from "Quebec diaspora" to this title because disapora is a description applicable only to Jews. A. Lafontaine 19:27, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: I think the original term was more appropriate. It was move to emigration on the false perception that the word "diaspora" was restricted to the Jews. As pointed out by Ground Zero, it is used for many other ethnic groups. The term might not be all that familiar in English, but in French the expression la dispora québécoise is fairly common.
Emigration is not all that bad, but the thing is that the phenomenon really is more than just an emigration. For about a century, people would move back and forth from Quebec to New England. Same with Ontario, but in completely different waves and in another context. People who eventually stayed in New England and Ontario were faced with various social problems as a result of their cultural isolation. For a long time, Quebec politicians tried all kinds of things to avoid the dispersion, but were largely unsuccessful. Today, the communications are almost completely cut between the francophone populations of Quebec, Ontario, and especially New England. 
I suggest moving the article back to its original name.
-- Mathieugp 15:44, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I can only fully agree. --Liberlogos 18:22, 10 July 2005 (UTC)

text: We'll wait a few more days. If nobody shouts, I'll do the move. :-) -- Mathieugp 12:13, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quebec disaspora
Talk:Belleville washer

message: The article currently says:
:Stacking in an alternating direction is the same as adding springs in series, resulting in a lower spring constant and greater deflection.
Shouldn't that read "the same spring constant but allowing greater total deflection"?
(And series-parallel stackings also can be utilized.)
Atlant 19:31, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Series-stacked Bellevilles 

message: * Probably oppose -- Unless people are planning a big expansion of washer, I'd oppose the merger. A Belleville is a pretty-specialized kind of washer, not really used for the same purposes as many other washers. Atlant 21:53, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Washer? 

message: Hello all... 
An image used in the article, specifically :Image:Bellevillewasherforcediagram.JPG, has a little bit of a licensing issue.  The image was uploaded back when the rules around image uploading were less restrictive.  It is presumed that the uploader was willing to license the picture under the GFDL license but was not clear in that regard.  As such, the image, while not at risk of deletion, is likely not clearly licensed to allow for free use in any future use of this article.  If anyone has an image that can replace this, or can go take one and upload it, it would be best.
You have your mission, take your camera and start clicking.--Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:33, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image needs replacement 

message: Hello, I would like to discuss the reference currently being used as the DIN 2093 reference. It is a link to a McMaster-Carr catalog page which includes almost nothing about DIN 2093. I have tried to link to a website which actually includes the tables of DIN 2093 tolerancing, and it keeps getting changed back. The reason being, that the tables are on the website of a 'manufacturer'. I would submit to everyone here, that no one would be able to buy from a manufacturer due to the quantities required. They would be far more likely to purchase from a McMaster-Carr catalog. So that would be more inclind to this 'advertising' that is spoken of. Further more the info is much weaker than the other page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.42.160.59 (talk) 14:04, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The original link you added we no different than the McMaster reference because it just mentioned the standard. The new link is far better because it does have the table. As such, I'm letting it stand. Wizard191 (talk) 14:48, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  DIN 2093 - Disc Spring Quality Spec's
Talk:Vermonter (train)

message: Vermonter: a resident of the state of Vermont. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.143.14.82 (talk) 23:57, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vermonter 

message: I know this marks me as a non-train buff but nowhere is there a description of the route.  Is it as beautiful as other mountain rail lines or is the rail line mostly stuck behind rusting vehicle dumps in the valleys.  I have no idea which is true and would like to know.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.110.240.90 (talk) 16:17, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Physical Features 

message: Apparently Colorado Railcar is defunct. Any news on what impact this will have on the proposed equipment change? Mackensen (talk) 04:52, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Equipment change 

message: The first five paragraphs are uncited. I'm aware of no requirement that content be especially dubious in order to warrant the  template. I see its ugliness as a goad to editors to do something about that sad state of affairs. Those five paragraphs are full of assertions which might well be opinion. Unfortunately I haven't had time to research the 1990s-2000s history of the Vermonter, though it's on my to-do list. Mackensen (talk) 14:10, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: They seem truthy to me because I personally experienced it all. To be clear, I did not add that content. But OK. Jehochman Talk 14:28, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section 

message: I corrected the max speed, it goes 125 MPH in New Jersey. The Channel of Random (talk) 02:46, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Max speed correction
Talk:Endless Love (1981 song)

message: This page looks like a complete disaster. The pages before despite looking nicer, were actually a lot clearer to understand. On Wikipedia, we aim to not only provide information but display it clearly. This page is NOT clear in any way. I suggest it be split back up into the Ross/Ritchie version and Carey/Vandross version. What do you guys think? Ultimate Star Wars Freak 19:33, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely not. What is so unclear about the way the information is presented here. I am tired of the Mariah Carey sensationalism that has been going on lately. She, not any other artist, is not special enough to have articles for their versions of cover tunes. Every other article has ONE article for the song, no matter how many people sang it and reguardless of who had a hit with the same record. There's not seperate articles for any Beatles song, any Bob Dylan song, and there does NOT need to be seperate articles for any Mariah Carey song. If you think somethjing looks unclear, fix it up here in this article (also, STATE what it is; don't be vague), and do not seperate anything. --FuriousFreddy 20:17, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: *Support.  There's only one song, which happens to have been sung by a number of people.  To have a separate article for each singer is unnecessary. --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 13:10, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested merge
Category talk:Functional groups

message: 'Functional group' and 'homologous series' are becoming confused. Many of the articles listed in this category are not functional groups but are homologous series. For example, Acid anhydride is not a functional group but a homologous series. It has a functional group; the carbonyl group, but in its itself it is not a functional group.
We need a category for homologous series. I am going about expanding the homologous series page right now. I am not to confident on making whole new categories so maybe someone else can do that.
Borb 19:45, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think we should remove anhydride from the functional groups list. Obviously, in addition to the functional group category, we can include it in the homologous series category.  Personally, I don't think 'Homologous series' deserves it's own category, but I am not the final authority on these matters. ~K 00:09, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

text: I agree. I started a category called :category:substituents. Please let me know if it is ok. --kupirijo (talk) 11:02, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

message: There is a page for Quaternary ammonium cations but not primary, secondary or tertiary.  They contain R-R-R-NH+, R-R-NH2+ or R-NH3+.
These groups are very important both as intermediates and in salts or zwitterions.  See the section
Ammonium#Organic_ammonium_ions
for more information.  
A page on this type of group would be very useful :-)
Cheers, telewatho (talk) 14:04, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is no page for the primary, secondary or tertiary ammonium cation functional groups
Talk:Terror of the Zygons

message: If the link says "The Doctor" then you would be expected to be directed to the Doctor article. What's wrong with "The Fourth Doctor"? --bjwebb 19:52, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The footage used for the building in London is Millbank Tower.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.189.90.10 (talk) 16:23, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment II

message: Is it fair on the story to have the ropey & rarely shown Loch Ness Monster model as its main pic, when the titular Zygons would represent it more appropriately?
PRL1973 (talk) 18:06, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a question of image rights. If an image of one or more Zygons can be obtained where the licensing is as "free" as that of :File:Skarasen.jpg, then it might be used. Otherwise, we stick with what we're permitted to use. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:24, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox image