lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates/delist/Wikipe-tan full length

message: Let's all be careful with the reverting here. de Bivort 04:29, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Careful

message: I think an explanation needs to be given for why it was delisted due to the somewhat heated debate. A simple statement that it was delisted is not enough of an explanation here. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:40, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to very much agree with the above. I am not a member of the Anime project, for the record. However, I cannot see that any really valid reason for the delisting was given, and I believe everyone is due a reasonable explanation. John Carter 12:44, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Aliasing.  It seems that is the remaining reason not rebutted in the argument.  Per Ned Scott, that is in process of repair. KyuuA4 17:12, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But "aliasing" is not a valid concern unless it seriously detracts from the image. As it's been used in multiple print instances, the aliasing is not even a valid issue. The only related requirement is that the image be high quality, which it is. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 02:14, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reasoning

message: Additional discussion from the delist discussion: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AFeatured_picture_candidates%2Fdelist%2FWikipe-tan_full_length&diff=168128678&oldid=168127586
-- Ned Scott 18:33, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional discussion
Talk:Tiger's Milk

message: Did the manufacturer write this? 92.15.26.152 (talk) 21:36, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like an advert 

message: what, no mention of tiger's milk ITSELF?
this nutrition bar is a spinoff/successor to the original product, an actual DRINK of the same name.  sold in powdered form in the 70s or so.  u either added it to water or to regular milk, i can't remember.  nor can i recall the taste.  i'm guessing something like malt or egg nog.
it was quite popular tho, and considered a health food; the 1973 movie sleeper (woody allen) has a line about "wheat germ, organic honey and tiger's milk."
should be like half of the article!
but i will leave it to someone who knows more about this than i.  i didn't even realize it had disappeared until 5 mins ago! 209.172.23.76 (talk) 03:32, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, we used to drink Tiger's milk every AM back in the early to mid 1970s. I think we bought it in some health food store. We liked it! I'd give it another try if it was still available. It was a powdered mix. 184.6.185.109 (talk) 15:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  powdered milk! 

message: Does anyone know 2601:647:C803:4670:147:7DEC:2DAB:BC55 (talk) 04:14, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to the original tiger milk bars
Talk:Flamboro Downs

message: I disagree with the tag that was recently placed on this article's page asking for "speedy deletion." I am the creator of the stub and have no connections whatsoever with Flamboro Downs racetrack. It was my intension of creating a stub for this local Hamilton attraction in the hope that others would add to and expand on it. Nhl4hamilton 04:58, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment
Talk:Vivox

message: I'll be expanding this section today or tomorrow. --Nate D 05:08, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: -VP of Marketing: Monty Sharma has granted me an interview later today to give a quick overview of the history of the company and other information about the company that is not very well documented which I'll record, transcribe and post on my website OhNate.com for reference here in this Wikipedia article. --Nate D 17:25, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: -I haven't yet had a chance to conduct the interview... I'll get to it.--Nate D 17:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:DotProject

message: The criticism doesn't have any references, either of the positive or negatives given in this section, and the entire section sounds more like a subjective view written in the objective style. Are there any references for either the claim of being a leading application or of the user interface objections? Ajdonnison 05:20, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 
Talk:Kingsdown, Swale

message: Wht cannot this article be simply called Kingsdown, Kent? It shows where the place is Peter Shearan (talk) 14:07, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I know! I've just seen that there IS one! But a better title might include "Swale, Kent" since it is in that District. The Parish Council is simply "Milstead and not as shown - it should be linked. I am slowly getting through a villages of Kent exercise, and will get there eventually! Peter Shearan (talk) 14:16, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  - and if it has a church, surely it is a village? Peter Shearan (talk) 14:23, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:Mork Goes Erk

message: A note: I used the WP:FA article, A Streetcar Named Marge as a model for structure, style and content ideas, when creating this new article on "Mork Goes Erk".  Cirt 06:23, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note on creation 
Talk:St Peter Claver College

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.spcc.qld.edu.au/services.php?id=59&category=about. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:19, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I've just removed a ton of unencyclopedic content from this article. Relevant guidelines for editing articles on schools are found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines; what I removed falls foul of those guidelines. In addition, it's obvious that there is some kind of group editing going on, perhaps a class project at the school; that's fine, I suppose, but such edits need to be neutral and in accordance with our guidelines. If this continues (the history shows at least three of these episodes of mass edits by single-purpose accounts, we will have no choice but lock the article and/or block the involved editors. Please see the guidelines for what is and what is not acceptable content. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 04:37, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert: addition of unencyclopedic content
Talk:La Hora Chanante

message: Broken english all over the article
----
I could´t agree more, i have tried to correct the most blatant mistakes and grammar inconsistencies but it should be rewritten altogether. It should be more concise too.--Mrfoxtalbot (talk) 13:35, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Node Magazine

message: This article has been assessed as a Fail.
The assessment is as follows :
1) The article is far too short. Its coverage needs to be expanded considerably. For instance, in the introduction it is claimed that it is "a hypertext version of the novel" but no further details of the novel are given. Considering the magazine is about the "Spook Country universe" the details linking the novel and the magazine need to be considerably expanded.
2) Two further sections of the article need to be written i) – a background section on the novel and a basic outline of the plot. I understand that the article is about Node magazine and not the novel but since the magazine is about the novel and its "universe", it's only sensible to provide a basic coverage of the novel. GA Criteria requires completeness in an article's coverage. ii) The magazine is quoted as being a "mini-wikipedia", examples needs to be given, quoted and referenced.
3) All references must be in accordance with WP:CITET
4) Wikipedia articles must be neutral in tone. The quotes sound too gushing "What the unknown Node-maestro has done is poles apart,,,,,,I believe, to a new kind of critical commentary on texts."
Tone down the adulatory language and find, quote and reference adverse criticism of the magazine in order to provide a balanced, critical perspective.
The article needs a lot of work before it can be re-nominated.
Tovojolo 15:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, MS, I've added the link. Are you the author? Skomorokh incite 17:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Status
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-10-22/Features and admins

message: No articles featured?!? Is this an error? Spawn Man 06:01, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, but you're about a week late, next issue is about to come out. The Placebo Effect 06:02, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm, my sign post didn't arrive until today - maybe the bot stuffed up. I thought I hadn't received it in a while... Spawn Man 06:10, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:McLoughlin

message: Lead is far too short, perhaps someone may add a summary of the lengthy history? Gaelicbow (talk) 09:42, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead
Talk:Kersten Committee

message: I propose moving this article to United States House Select Committee on the Baltic States. That was the formal name of the committee, and since the article is primarily about the committee and its investigation is probably a more appropriate article title. That way, it would be consistent with other defunct committees of the U.S. House. Anyone have any thoughts? I have cross posted this at Project Congress as well.DCmacnut<> 04:05, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good. The current title is goofy anyway. Renata (talk) 05:45, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Works for me as well. PetersV <SMALL><SMALL>     </SMALL> TALK</SMALL> 20:56, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move to formal committee name
Talk:Bruce Winn

message: This page should not be deleted because Bruce Winn is a contemporary Ceramic Artist that others should know about.  He has been very influencial to many students and other artists.Ceramichistorystudent 06:13, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the deletion tag and did some basic cleanup. - ∅ (∅), 07:32, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bob Odom

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Signed,The4lines |||| (You Asked?) (What I've Done.) 21:35, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Willamette University

message: Punit Renjen CEO of Deloitte  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niraj Saraf (talk • contribs) 16:05, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

message: Punit Renjen CEO of Deloitte Niraj Saraf (talk) 16:10, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Alumni 

message: most of this section is unsourced by third-party sources. I suggest we reduce the section to a general mention that there are some fraternities. Since none of the historical information is verifiable, I propose deletion. The events of 2013 should remain in the article, however, since they are verifiable. What do you think, @GuardianH? --Melchior2006 (talk) 08:48, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think the entire Greek life section should be deleted. It would probably be best to tag it with citations needed and trim all supplementary material to source. GuardianH (talk) 12:52, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good. --Melchior2006 (talk) 13:27, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek life
Talk:Saint Maur International School

message: I am the author of the first article and there will be a similarities with the one I posted at the magazine "The Weekender". I donate this article to Wikipedia under the GNU licence.
Gilles-Japon 06:37, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As stated at the bottom of the submission pages, all articles are licensed under GFDL. -Wooty [Woot?] [Spam! Spam! Wonderful spam!] 07:56, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: I think that it would make sense to merge St. Maur International School with this page. As far as I can see the offical website's name is "Saint Maur International School". John Smith's (talk) 22:33, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alternatively, you might simply overwrite current St. Maur International School with a redirect to here. There isn't much, if any, additional content at St. Maur International School which rises above advertising copy. This article does have remaining minor copyedit, POV, non-notable, and unsourced issues, but following your significant edits, this article's content and format is quite improved. This title is more correct, too. I don't think putting the two articles together as either a content merge or redirect is a controversial action requiring a wait for consensus as the two articles clearly describe the same entity. Michael Devore (talk) 01:47, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirected and cleaned up. -Wooty [Woot?] [Spam! Spam! Wonderful spam!] 07:56, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work on the cleanup job. Decremented Michael's watchlist_entries. Michael Devore (talk) 08:19, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article merger

message: * article was using a mix of British and American English - since "high school" is the most common translation of kokogatto and articles should stay consistent in usage of one or the other, I reformed the article to use American English.
* "good" universities seems like unencyclopedic language/weasel wordy. might do some research to see if this is true and if it is, replace it with more accurate phrasing.
* removed the section about grades - not really exceptional or notable.
* I'm sure this article can be expanded quite a bit, at least per the school's site if not through secondary sources. There seems to be quite a bit of history here. -Wooty [Woot?] [Spam! Spam! Wonderful spam!] 07:56, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes on article
Talk:Milestone (disambiguation)

message: Changed the description. The editions translated into english are all called Milestones though a more literal translation of the original title is "Milestones along the Road."  Qutb was not at all a trained Islamic scholar, though he wrote a multi-volume commentary on the Quran. 
Qutb didn't just want to build a society entirely on Quranic grounds. His obsession was restoring Sharia law, which uses Sunna as well as the Quran. He believed Islam was dead and had to be saved by reinstituting the Sharia. --BoogaLouie (talk) 19:44, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Qutb's Milestones

message: I moved Milestone, Inc. to Milestone (developer) because there are other companies named Milestone, Inc. ... But there is another developer named Milestone srl, so its article could also have the same title. I think it's a bit of a mess here, how does one organize this stuff? -- Stormwatch (talk) 18:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Milestone, Inc. (developer)?--Ssola (talk) 14:29, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Milestone, developers
Talk:Penn State College of Information Sciences and Technology

message: there has been an considerable amount of articles on notable and less-notable Penn state faculty from this department added to WP recently, apparently in a concertedeffort with a consistent pattern of public-relations-style writing, excessive lists of papers, and a failure to concentrate on the elements of notability a shown by WP:PROF. Please beware of WP:COI, and se WP:BFAQ, which though oriented to business, applies to universities also. I support these faculty articles when they can be supported, but unless they are written with greater care, they are nor likely to survive. se my talk page for a discussion of what is needed. I will be glad to offer what help may be needed. DGG (talk) 07:18, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Faculty

message: Link REMOVED. This website is not in any way affiliated to or related to the College. It's a smear website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.255.63.232 (talk) 12:16, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ISTBuilding.com
Talk:Green IT

message: This article does not identify any specific project, contains only arguments for green computing and a reference to a recent article.  Edits to Green computing seem more useful to the user community than a substantially redundant article. tooold 07:25, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Support.  I've put a lot of work into the Green computing article.  I was just about to add the Merge proposal myself, but you beat me to it. — EagleOne\Talk 17:54, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Proposal
Talk:Vanderson Scardovelli

message: The creator of this article noticed the Wanderson Scardovelli spelling used on his current team's roster and created a redirect from it back in Oct 2007, when this article was created, yet that spelling hadn't been mentioned in the article itself.  I fixed that.  Gene Nygaard (talk) 04:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Group method of data handling

message: Isn't that what is more commonly called a loss function? QVVERTYVS (hm?) 09:39, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External criterion? 

message: This article is missing descriptions of what the algorithm and the final model look like. The description
could just as well describe a boosting algorithm; it wasn't until I read the Schmidhuber paper that I realized this algorithm is learning layered neural nets. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:15, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Algorithm and model
Talk:Boiler feedwater

message: What us the material properties for Feedwater?
Thanks
:As I'm German, I'm only aware of a German standard describing the properties. You can find them in the article on the German Wikipedia, linked in the sidebar under "Languages" as "Deutsch". You'll find the numbers at the very bottom of the German article, in table format. You should be able to understand that section, even if you can't read German.  There is probably an equivalent standard somewhere in the ASME boiler code, or an ABMA recommendation. If somebody could cite that, that'd be great. --Tetris L (talk) 21:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I googled a bit and found this. It may help you. --Tetris L (talk) 22:06, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The German standards are used by most of Western Europe / EU. Tunheim (talk) 16:01, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Indian hog deer

message: Your edit summary for a revert edit says "unsourced, unexplained", despite the fact that I provided a source for both, and the IUCN status page also has the species under Axis porcinus. Mind explaining why? 74.68.117.176 (talk) 21:14, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: See discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mammals#Unexplained_reverts_of_a_good_edit_on_Indian_hog_deer. —  Jts1882 | talk  08:11, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

text: Agree! Placement in Axis is also in line with arguments put forward by Red List assessors Timmins et al. 2015. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 11:32, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rapid revert?
Talk:Armenian Encyclopedia Publishing House

message: On the Armenian wiki page, there is a link to all the volumes of the encyclopedia, except Volume 3. Does anyone know what has happened to that volume?Neo ^ (talk) 04:40, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volume 3 

message: Ostensibly about the Armenian Soviet Encyclopedia, the article actually gives an overview of the activities of the Soviet Armenian Encyclopedia Publishing House and its successor in independent Armenia, Armenian Encyclopedia Publishing House. The article needs to be rewritten and renamed to the latter to make sense (since Armenian Encyclopedia Publishing House exists and operates right now) or else divided into separate articles about the encyclopedia and the publishing house. Revolution Saga (talk) 23:25, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Revolution Saga, I split the articles into Armenian Encyclopedia Publishing House and Armenian Soviet Encyclopedia, is it ok now? Wikisaurus (talk) 00:37, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for split or rewriting of article
Talk:Possibilism (geography)

message: Shouldn't this be merged with environmental determinism? Auccl799 08:41, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But they are complete opposites! A reference to the page seems appropriate. 76.198.183.220 (talk) 21:30, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

message: Merging this page with environmental determinism.
--Sarah Whittenburg (talk) 18:11, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Deletion
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Accessibility/Policy proposal

message: After thinking about this, IMHO the objective of this policy should be to follow closely the W3C accessibility work to the Wikipedia, that is to adapt the WAI documents (   ) into a policy and the Manual of Style. Therefore, it's not very important to specify the disabilities we would like to cover, that's the work done by the W3C.
WCAG 2.0 is not approved yet, and current draft is very critisized, so the policy should be mainly based in WCAG 1.0 (but adapting it to new technologies like XHTML). Probably the best option is to concentrate in Level AA, because usually it is regarded as only a little more difficult than Level A, and also  Level AAA is simply too difficult to implement (and not well defined, so you cannot always verify if you have achieved level AAA or not). A recent study also advocates for Level AA. Opinions? —surueña 20:49, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoa, are you sure you're speaking English? In any case, I'll support whatever you want to do, surueña. I have full faith in your abilities to draft up an excellent policy. Let me know if there's something I can do. --(L'Aquatique: Bringing chaos & general mayhem to the Wiki for One Year!) 05:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I'll probably ask for help in a short time. Note that although I've read some articles and documents about accessibility, and device independence, I'm not an expert in the field so this draft will take me a lot of time until I collect all the info. And please, feel free to correct all my typos, I suppose yesterday I was too tired :-) Cheers —surueña 09:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Objectives
Talk:Topography of Phitsanulok Province

message: Most of this article is unsourced and thin on content. I vote to merge it with the provincial article. Seligne (talk) 12:44, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge this with Phitsanulok Province