lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Antiobesity preparations

message: Should be listed by generic
--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't get it... what do you mean? I don't see any trade names. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:21, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Listing
Template talk:Antithrombotics

message: Should this new row be created based on classification at http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/full/126/3_suppl/265S/T1? Initially would contain fondaparinux and Idraparinux (two new studies at http://content.nejm.org/content/vol357/issue11/).Badgettrg 03:06, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the template largely follows the WHO's classification, I'd be cautious about adding new rows. For now, my recommendation would be to create a new article Factor Xa inhibitor, using the above link as a source, and then adding that article to the template, and use parenthesis to indicate the structure. --Arcadian 11:44, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New row for Factor Xa inhibitors?
Template talk:Phosphodiesterase inhibitors

message: Note that many of the phosphodiesterase inhibitors listed here are not highly selective, most of them inhibit at least two or three different PDE subtypes to some extent. Where possible they have been placed in the category which reflects the PDE subtype they inhibit most effectively, but readers should not assume that this is the only subtype that is inhibited in vivo. Meodipt (talk) 23:33, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Oralin (insulin)

message: I dont know how to format this article further, since i am new to wikipedia 76.237.132.99 17:30, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Okay, I logged in, and added the reference from where I took it. Someone please format it the way it is supposed to be for the reference, since I dont know how to do it. Lithdoc 00:30, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Estrogens and antiestrogens

message: Okay, I'm trying to sum up the results of the above discussion. Please contradict me if I got anything wrong.
* Consensus for keeping the ATC-based navboxes (called medicine-associated above, although they are part of WP:PHARM as much as of WP:MED, but never mind).
* Consensus for keeping the mechanism-based navboxes. Boghog raised concerns about the boxes getting too large, but as long as they are collapsed (and, my addition, placed below the ATC boxes), and given el3ctr0nika's intention to remove redundancies, this is hopefully not a big issue.
* No consensus on removing redlinks. Although redlinks violate WP:NAV, I won't keep nitpicking here. WP:NAV is not policy, after all.
el3ctr0nika, unless you or someone else have complaints about this summary, would you be so kind and reinstate the ATC-based boxes? These are ,  and , and any others you might know of. I'd ask you to add them on top of the mechanism boxes, because (as has been pointed out somewhere above) they are probably the most useful for most people and certainly the easiest to navigate. Hope everyone is happy with my conclusions. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 13:49, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me. Though I should note that I may or may not be able to reduce redundancy in the mechanism of action navboxes in the way that I'd like to (due to potential limitations with the template system). In any case, I'll sooner or later get around to seeing if it can be done and implementing the changes. I'll look into reinstating  and  as well. Though, it should be noted that I'm starting to develop wiki burnout, so I may procrastinate. If anybody else wants to do it instead please, feel free. Also, it should be noted that the  template just redirected to  when I edited it, so that navbox did not actually exist (at the time at least, I don't know if it did before or not). And finally, sure, I always do med/indication templates followed by pharm/mechanism of action templates for navboxes anyway. Seems like the best order. el3ctr0nika (Talk | Contribs) 04:11, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving forward
Template talk:Cell wall disruptive antibiotics

message: Per comments on the Help Desk, the # appears to be cryptic. I suggest:
* Replace # with 
* Replace # = WHO-EM
 with 
This will show as:


---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 19:46, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Or use an asterisk, also a common method of footnoting in situations like this. – ukexpat (talk) 20:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  #
Talk:Supreme Hockey League

message: I don't think that Soviet Class A2 should be redirected to this league. Pervaya Liga was the second highest league in the Soviet Union and there was another even lower league which was then the Soviet Class B. Vysshaya Liga or Russian Major League has been created in 1992 and then it became the second highest league in the Russian hockey, not in the Soviet Era. --Vnnen (talk) 16:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I dunno. It's still the legal successor to Class A2 was this,  as it was run by the FHR from the soviet union until present...--Львівске (talk) 18:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem with redirect
Talk:Chimango caracara

message: This bird could definitely be placed in :Category:Birds of Patagonia and :Category:Birds of Tierra del Fuego, but I wasn't sure if adding it to those meant it should be removed from :Category:Birds of Chile and :Category:Birds of Argentina. Hopefully someone who knows the category guidelines better can do the right thing here.
IanGreenleaf (talk) 05:20, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Talk:850s

message: I can't find a reference for anyone named "Samara the Sweet" outside this article and its mirror pages. Also, "Queen of Spain" would be rather unlikely, as "Spain" proper did not exist in the 850s. So I've excluded the comment that she was born in this decade by making it a hidden comment until further notice. Alekjds talk 17:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Samara the Sweet
Talk:White-throated caracara

message: Much of the information in the previous version of this article (and the entire Diet and Reproduction sections) applied to other caracara species. Some other info was reasonably accurate for this species but its citation was to a Cornell Birds of the World hummingbird article. Hence an almost complete rewriting was necessary. Craigthebirder (talk) 00:36, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  February 14, 2023 edits
Talk:Variable oystercatcher

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Haematopus unicolor - Point Chevalier.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for May 13, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-05-13. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:35, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Markham's storm petrel

message: *HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, volume 1 (esp. on taxonomic change)
*The population estimate from here based on Brooke (2004), presumably Albatrosses and Petrels across the World (Bird Families of the World) First Edition ()
*Jahnckea, Jamie (1994). "Biología y conser vación de la golondrina de tempestad negra Oceanodroma markhami (Salvin 1883) en la península de Paracas, Perú". Informe Técnico (in Spanish). APECO. The source is offline so any help here would be great.
*If you took a photo of a Markham's storm petrel and want to upload it follow the steps here at the Commons: Release
Thank you! Therapyisgood (talk) 22:49, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should be also posted in WP:Birds talk page so they'll know you need help, I copy pasted it there. This looks like GA potential Therapyisgood. 171.49.253.43 (talk) 23:12, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  If anyone has these sources feel free to add information about them to the article. 

message: *
* Therapyisgood (talk) 00:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: and another:
* 
- Aa77zz (talk) 18:38, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources to add 

message: We are currently preparing this article for re-nomination at WP:FAC. Since we are close to get this done, let's have a list of outstanding issues that need to be solved before nomination (please feel free to add if you spot an issue!). I start with two still outstanding issues from my old review at FAC:
* After further exploration in November 2013 based on the recording,[20][26] in 2019 – I can't quite follow; is it 2013 or 2019 when the discovery was made? --Jens Lallensack (talk) 15:48, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: * Corrected. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 12:04, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

text: *These seem to show the effects of climate change (which habitats would be suitable under different scenarios predicted for 2080). We need to include this information in the text, too. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 17:08, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

text: *The first issue I can't find in the text anymore. The second issue I don't really see: Saltpeter and potassium nitrate are not precisely the same. If "saltpeter" makes problems, we can also replace it with the more general "salt crust". --Jens Lallensack (talk) 17:08, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outstanding issues
Talk:Black-billed gull

message: How about a copy of :File:Chroicocephalus bulleri.JPG (very clear image at full size) thumb just before "references", get rid of the over processed :File:Black-billed Gull RWD.jpg, and replace lead photo with a cut down version showing less of the post that it is standing on? -Tony Wills (talk) 09:14, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustrations 

message: The German article appears to have more info if someone cares to translate. --Tony Wills (talk) 10:56, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand? 

message: The reference for "endangered" status in the sidebar is from a 2012 report. A 2016 report has since become available. The status remains the same but it would be good to keep the citation up-to-date, especially as less authoritative sources are currently referring to the bird as "critically endangered".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cameron.coombe (talk • contribs) 05:09, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:25, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update BirdLife International Reference?

message: A good-size colony has made its home right in the centre of Christchurch, on a demolition site known as "Philip Carter's swimming pool". Given that the Catholic Church is in the process of buying up that block for their replacement cathedral, I suspect it won't be long before there's media coverage. I've taken a few photos; quite an impressive sight actually. Schwede66 21:02, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Important Bird Area? 

message: The redirect Tarāpuku has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  ArcticSeeress (talk) 17:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Tarāpuku]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Sallins and Naas railway station

message: my own info is that Sallins stn closed to passengers 09/09/1963, closed to goods 11/01/1977. But if you know different? Suckindiesel 17:46, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Closing date

message: in List of closed railway stations in Ireland i have provided a link to naas railway station which in the future i will create a page for, until then could i remove the redirect link for naas, as sallins station and naas station were two different stations. In the naas artcile, i'll make a note that it has in effect been replaced by sallins (hence why it was renamed to include "and naas"Halowithhorns89 (talk) 09:24, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirection
Talk:Elegy (film)

message: "Paz Vega auditioned for the leading part, but lost out to Penélope Cruz."'
I find this dubious becuase from what I have heard Cruz was on this project since she read the book over five years ago. Please provide a reference for such statements. 
207.69.137.6 (talk) 18:59, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: After review the edits made by the person who added this, it looks like they are just adding smack to see what they can get in Wikipedia articles, without any verifiable basis. I will now remove. If you find a citible-verifiable-source, you can add it back. 207.69.137.6 (talk) 19:06, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casting: Paz Vega 

message: * ... plot synopsis, review, cast, production credits, awards
Reference available for citing in the article body. Erik (talk) 19:55, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allmovie 

message: POVIn the german version of this film he told her "that his car has been broken down on washington bridge!". A mere excuse for not beeing a representative man  where is hood?  or decisive for a party. So that shown relationsship manks a little responsibility; I think. Sex and love at a university level told, ends up with her cancer. Mirrowing his hv... Victims who victimizes each others by revealed unconciousness are visible. Good (k)night prince! means a romantic format which is somehow been seen satiric.--Raskollnika (talk) 06:23, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  tide tables...
Talk:Saunders's gull

message: Would someone please correct the title of this page?  Obviously, it was created by someone with a poor grasp of basic English punctuation. 220.136.230.124 (talk) 06:11, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, this is the correct usage according to all of the governing ornithological authorities.  John Trapp (talk) 21:06, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Numb (2007 film)

message: It's not an article, it's an advertisement.
Rewrite it or get rid of it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.162.209.213 (talk) 19:50, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oooh, get you two. Rewrite it yourself if it's so bad. Brad 18:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: AGREEDKp.murphy (talk) 20:24, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obviously written by the studio
File talk:Banamex logo.png

message: The original was provided to the web as a high-resolution jpeg.  Having the Wikipedia version of the same resolution doesn't provide new material for potential brand piracy.  I don't see how that policy applies here. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 17:54, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A high-resolution image here doesn't add any encyclopedic value above and beyond the low-res version - also, it's policy to use low-res per WP:NFCC#3b. Also, don't forget much of the world is still on dial-up. Videmus Omnia  Talk  17:57, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: High-res fair use
Talk:Carmona, Cavite

message: i'll be help to improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. thank you..
Galingko (talk) 09:49, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You can either wait the 4 days until you become WP:AUTOCONFIRMED or see WP:RFR to get confirmed rights.  Also if you have specific changes you would like made you can post them here before the 4 days is up and someone will look at them for you. --Jnorton7558 (talk) 18:16, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi to both of you, the table containing the timeline of historical accounts is already re-written. gerryyabes 17:13, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from , 6 November 2011 
Talk:Scott information system

message: "D(A) will be a Scott domain when T is countable". I think you are considering Scott domains with countable bases, which is not the definition given on the wikipedia page. I propose to move the sentence to after the equivalence, and reword to "D(A) will have a countable basis when T is countable". OK? Sam Staton 17:56, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm, if we remove the stipulation that T is countable D(A) might even fail to be algebraic (and thus not a Scott Domain by either definition!) --NoizHed 12:24, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Ok I see what you mean now. I have edited it accordingly. --NoizHed 12:28, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:AROS Research Operating System

message: With regards to http://merlancia.us/amiga-hyperion/35-5decmcewenexhibit5show_case_doc.pdf mentioned in the Hyperion Entertainment entry, should some mention of AROS's potentially disputed legality be mentioned here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.104.34.212 (talk • contribs) 2007-12-23T20:16:45Z
Well, yes, problem is that original sources were cloused source, even OS 3.0 or OS 3.1
So, no matter how useful, advanced AROS is, this remains a problem.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.121.33.231 (talk) 19:25, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Threats to legality? 

message: The AROS Mascot is called Kitty and she is a cartoon that was drawn on the original 68K Classic Amiga systems. The AROS operating system is being ported to i386 and PowerPC systems mostly, but has plans according to the AROS web site of ARM, Sun SPARC, MIPS, and other processing platforms. They are looking for open source developers to port open source programs to AROS for a bounty. It tries to be compatabile with AmigaOS 3.1 at the API level like WINE and UAE. Plus a version of it runs under X86 Linux. An Introduction to AROS should help the article. As well as the FAQS on AROS settle the legal issues and how AROS was made and what it can and cannot do. Orion Blastar (talk) 01:49, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  AROS portability and trivia 

message: Could someone please find a reference to this statement?Xorxos (talk) 15:47, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Reference added. On schedule and rocking did not mean OS4 but AmigaOne. Xorxos (talk) 22:09, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: On schedule and rocking

message: Could someone upload a picture that doesnt have 'furry' animals on it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.0.252.105 (talk) 07:05, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Screenshot

message: What about AspireOS???? In-Correct (talk) 18:01, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: AspireOS
Talk:White-necked petrel

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Pterodroma cervicalis - SE Tasmania.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on October 9, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-10-09. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:35, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Pterodroma cervicalis - SE Tasmania.jpg]] to appear as POTD
Talk:Soft-plumaged petrel

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Pterodroma mollis light morph - SE Tasmania 2019.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for February 11, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-02-11. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:55, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Papuan king parrot

message: I think you are right about the photo - now to find out something interesting for DYK for this one...Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:16, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Any ideas?? Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:12, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I note your agreement with the species identity of the infobox photograph, please add something to complete the discussion on the bird talk page. "DYK that Papuan King Parrots are often unnoticed because they feed quietly in dense forest". This is probably the best hook for most readers, although I find some aspects of the various plumage patterns fascinating. Snowman (talk) 09:53, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I noted on the bird discussion. My other idea for a hook was "DYK..that the Australian Museum curator Edward Pierson Ramsay was the first person to describe the Pig-nosed Turtle, Giant Bandicoot, and Papuan King Parrot." ? Casliber (talk · contribs) 17:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Talk:Red-tailed amazon

message: I've just finished a clean-up of the first sections (essentially the intro, and subsections Description, Habitat, Behavior, and Breeding). This leaves the last two major sections; Threats and Conservation efforts. I have not looked at them, but seeing they were added by the same person who added the majority of the text I just checked, please note that: 
* Do not assume the claims are correct. Check them if possible (there were several misunderstandings in the section I just corrected). 
* Check for copyvio. Some sections were fine, but some of the sections I just corrected were direct copy&paste of large sections from the indicated references, i.e. copyvio. 
• Rabo³ • 21:00, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up

message: Is the current low resolution unsharp cage image really better than the one that it replaced?  
:File:Amazona_brasiliensis_001_1280.jpg
I am losing interest in contributing to Wikipedia.
Tomfriedel (talk) 22:09, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 22:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Image? 
Talk:Yellow-billed amazon

message: I added a DYK nom here, though there might be a better one. Be nice to get Linnaeus's original description as a quote in the reference. Will be on one of the scanned copies online somewhere which I keep losing track of...Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:39, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a link in "Cited texts". Were you looking for a translated version? Snowman (talk) 12:53, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a quote= parameter in the fields of cite book, and this is where we can add Linnaeus' descriptions - see Common Raven. They are often just a few Latin words anyway and I think look good :). Just need the page numbers...I need to get off the computer soon so will have a look in a few hours if you don't get round to it first. Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:10, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Festive amazon

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved (closed by non-admin page mover)   * Pppery * it has begun... 03:52, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have amended two lines of the proposal to use "Saint" rather than "St." since those two pages were redirects rather than articles.  (talk) 06:32, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for fixing my error - much appreciated. Iloveparrots (talk) 12:33, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 July 2023
Talk:Kawall's amazon

message: # Forshaw specially says the names White-faced Amazon and White-cheeked Amazon are inappropriate, because it has green cheeks. I have nominated a name that I think is appropriate, but if there is a specific reason why "Kawall's Amazon" is not appropriate, I would support "White-chinned Amazon", but not "White-cheeked Amazon".Snowman (talk) 19:53, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Support

message: # IOC-name. Argument based on coloration is Original research, as WP uses the names used, not what we think is the best for a species.-- Kim van der Linde at venus 13:41, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Oppose

message: The IOC changed the name back to the eponymous name in Dec 2009; see IOC updates. The article is now at the eponymous name. Snowman (talk) 16:56, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of page