lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1964 European Cup final

message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SG6CBDHma88
Mazzola scored on 77'--Unikalinho (talk) 03:02, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Who says the clock in that video is correct? Only the referee and UEFA had the official match clock for that game, and UEFA say Mazzola scored in the 76th minute. – PeeJay 09:13, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The clock has nothing to do with it. I watched the match with my stopwatch. So I am sure--Unikalinho (talk) 12:15, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That's even worse! You and your stopwatch are not considered reliable sources. – PeeJay 13:11, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: UEFA-site has seen something different? :) But the site can be mistaken, when it tell about archive-years--Unikalinho (talk) 13:35, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it can be mistaken, but in this case it isn't. And I say that with complete certainty as I have in my possession numerous official UEFA statistics handbooks that all say Mazzola scored in the 76th minute, not the 77th. – PeeJay 13:57, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: What more can I say? :) But I suggest you to watch the match with your stopwatch :)--Unikalinho (talk) 15:15, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because my stopwatch would not be considered reliable either. How do I know that your stopwatch is accurate? Or how do you know that mine is? What you are describing is the very definition of original research, which is not permitted here. – PeeJay 15:21, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full match (video) 
Talk:Patrick Leonard

message: Woulds it not be useful to say what he did on each of the projects rather than just having a list of credits? I.e. just a note as to whether he produced, wrote music, wrote lyrics or performed with each of the artists?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thefuguestate (talk • contribs) 16:53, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would second that. This article is rather 'thin' for someone who has been involved with so many artists. Info as that suggested above along with things like how he got into the business, first break, how he went from musician to writer and beyond. Due to personal stuff at this moment this is not a task I am able to take on, but I'm certain there are a few someones out there that may be able to make a start.THX1136 (talk) 01:31, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mana Neyestani

message: The references, including BBC one state that Neyestani is of Azeri ethnicity. It is important in the context of the cartoon controversy  so I have restored it. Alex Bakharev 23:11, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnic origin 

message: I have reformatted references in inline format. Please edit them to make them more formal (and remove if they are unreliable). BTW what was the name of Neyestani's father? I think it is worth to mention Alex Bakharev 23:10, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References about his father 

message: He currently lives in Paris, France   
--Milegue (talk) 20:50, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Talk:Administrative divisions of Yugoslavia

message: *1.) This is not original research or somebody maybe think that is original research to read peace agreement between Serbia and Bulgaria or between Yugoslavia and Italia or communist act which has given 1 or more towns to another republic ?!
*2) ??
*3) Where are this article where is spoken about that ??
**This article is ridiculous, just see its introduction part: "Border changes during Yugoslavia describes how today international borders has been changed between birth of Yugoslavia on 1 December 1918 and her death on 25 June 1991" - how can "today international borders" to be changed "between birth of Yugoslavia on 1 December 1918 and her death on 25 June 1991" when such borders WERE CREATED AFTER DEATH OF YUGOSLAVIA IN 1991??? Second: the article in fact speak about borders of present-day countries (Bosnia, Croatia, Serbia) from 19th century to end of the 20th century and the  question is "how exactly is that connected to Yugoslavia that existed only from 1918 to 1991?" (Articles related to Yugoslavia usually speak about 1918-1991 period). Therefore, the article is indeed an original research that mixing history of Yugoslavia with histories of Serbia, Bosnia, Croatia, etc... PANONIAN 17:59, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As I said: "today independent states DID NOT entered Yugoslavia" because THEY DID NOT EXISTED in 1918 when Yugoslavia was created - these states were created in 1991-1992. Therefore, the article cannot speak about non-existing things. We can only have article that speak about administrative divisions of Yugoslavia from 1918 to 1991 and that is all, but I do not see a point why would we writte such article because all of that is already mentioned in other articles related to Yugoslavia. Regarding your statement that "all of today states (not Macedonia) has been independent before creation of Yugoslavia" it is so ridiculous that it is even not worthy of commenting - did you ever heard for Austria-Hungary that ruled over these "independent states"? PANONIAN 18:40, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

text: State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs also did not existed during existence of Yugoslavia, but before it, so it is again not the subject of "Border changes during Yugoslavia". Also, there is article named Yugoslavia that speak about its birth and there is article History of Croatia which speak about Croatian history. PANONIAN 21:28, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Part of article under this name is deleted because consensus is reached on other wiki page which will be very soon deleted. Part of discussion from this page:
"If I need to choose between this version of article and deleting I support deleting. Similar to that we will need to delete part of article Administrative divisions of Yugoslavia. This part which need to be deleted is under name Origins because is speaking about very similar thing. Rjecina 16:39, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree 100%. :)) PANONIAN 00:32, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Origins
Talk:SuperOffice

message: Article deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SuperOffice, unilaterally undeleted by . - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C]  AfD? 21:28, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: With three votes?  When does process trump common sense?  Guettarda 15:10, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:HCPT – The Pilgrimage Trust

message: In our current climate the term "handicapped" is considered insensitive, and therefore it is reasonable that this term be omitted from HCPT's own publications. However, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and therefore it is reasonable that an explanation for the title "HCPT" should be given, especially as the charity continues to make itself known by those initials.
The word "handicapped" has been variously deleted and reinstated several times during the evolution of this article. I believe that, as a historical fact, it should stay. Preacherdoc (talk) 15:50, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - I volunteered on a HCPT pilgrimage a number of years ago, and until I saw this talk page didn't realise it now went under a new name.  I will detail the name change in the article, and provide a verifiable reference of the organisation's former name from Companies house. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 20:18, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "Handicapped"?
Wikipedia talk:Knights of NPOV

message: Another alleged member, I claim to see. Destroy all that is POV, we say we will. A userbox, I claim to belive is a good idea, if apparently get round to understanding WikiMarkup well enough I do. Like Yoda, I claim I will stop speaking. Soaringgoldeneagle 16:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, I do, with the userbox idea. VigilancePrime (talk)   :-) 20:11, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Userbox?
Category talk:Italian cardinals

message: Is it just me, or is this getting so huge as to be unwieldy?  Should we give it some subcategories?  And if so, what?  Two ideas that suggest themselves to me are by modern region of birth and/or by city of birth and/or by century. Neddyseagoon - talk 16:36, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Subcategories for the big cities (Florence, Venice, etc.) are a must, particularly for cardinals which pre-date Italian unification and were citizens of their respective Republic or Duchy. Within those, we could organize by century if need be. Since unificaton, we can have 19th, 20th, and 21st century categories, although unfortunately people seem to live their lives without any respect to being neatly categorized within one century. Savidan 20:31, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Chadian Arabic

message: This should definitely be Shuwa Arabic, not Chadian Arabic.  If you look in Ethnologue, you will see that it listed as Shuwa Arabic for every country but Chad.  If you look for the Baggara people, you will see they mostly speak Shuwa Arabic, both in Sudan and Chad.  Baggara of Sudan and Chad  While I have seen a lot of spellings, Showa, Shoa, Shua, etc., I have never seen this language called anything else.        What Ethnologue calls Western Sudanese Arabic is another name it uses for Shuwa Arabic.  Note that it says Western Sudanese Arabic and Khartoum Arabic are not "compatible".  Mikenassau 00:45, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: first, please don't go unilaterally redirecting without consensus. Secondly, wikipedia uses the most common English name, and I've never heard a Chadian or anyone who's lived in Chad call it Shuwa Arabic, nor a linguist. Hence revert. Drmaik 04:06, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ISO 639-3, following Ethnologue, of course, also refers to this language as Chadian Arabic.  "Shuwa Arabic" should be submitted as an alternate name to the ISO authorities for inclusion in the standard, but they are hesitant to change the primary name of a language without overwhelming linguistic evidence.  I know because I've tried to change names of other languages with them and they only added the "native name" as an alternate.  "Chadian Arabic" is what ISO uses, so that is what Wikipedia should lean towards, if possible, with appropriate redirects. (Taivo (talk) 01:47, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Right now, the distribution of Chadian/Shuwa Arabic is what is shown in Ethnologue.  Is this the same language as Western Sudanese Arabic?  If so, we should include Sudan in the distribution comments with an appropriate reference.  Just saying so doesn't make it so in Wikipedia.  Do you have a reference that we can include that will back that up? (Taivo (talk) 02:04, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Include Sudan? 

message: Since this article is apparently locked for editing, at some point someone might correct the reference to Jullien de Pommerol, Patrice (currently given under P for Pommerol). The full last name is Jullien de Pommerol; given name Patrice. 213.50.106.161 (talk) 22:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  correction to reference
Talk:Lingwu

message: It seems to me that Lingzhou is a historical name for the city currently called Lingwu.  If this is true, then these two articles should be merged under the current name of the city. Dsmdgold 16:42, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case I'm going to leave the merge tags for a few mored days, just in case someone involved in the Lingzhou article objects, and then I will merge the two articles. Dsmdgold 03:00, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Vampeaneze

message: This page is simply a copy of the Vampaneze page with a typo in the title. They have the same content, so just redirect to Vampaneze. -AtionSong 16:43, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, there's no reason to even have one article, let alon two. Redirected both to the author page, which already has a significantly big and detailed section on the topic. DreamGuy 18:59, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  On Merge
Talk:Joseph Commings

message: I've given this interesting article a copy edit.  It would be great to know where this information comes from -- I suspect it's from introductory material to the recent Crippen & Landru collection of short stories, but I don't own a copy so can't say for sure.  But it does need attribution. Accounting4Taste 16:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Unico

message: Who is it who sings the "Katy the Kitty Witch" song in Fantastic Adventures of Unico? --Ragemanchoo (talk) 09:15, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: English version song question

message: Has this been issued on DVD? The article never addresses that. --24.21.148.155 (talk) 05:01, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Saving Our Fragile Earth on DVD?

message: Seriously? Wouldn't it be more appropriate for the well-known (outside of the anime community) Unico company to have the "Unico", and this be "Unico (anime)"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.49.46.180 (talk) 23:07, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: More notable than Unico Int'l?

message: "The rights to all Unico manga and anime transferred from Sanrio to Tezuka Productions after Tezuka's death in 1989; unlike Sanrio, Tezuka Productions has no American distribution arm like Studio Ghibli, Miyazaki seems to hate Hollywood movies in the future, hence the reason why it took 25 years for the two movies to be licensed for an official North American DVD release." 
The part of this section that reads ", Miyazaki seems to hate Hollywood movies in the future," seems out of place and the sentence would read better if it was removed. - rorqualmaru (talk) 05:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home Media Section 

message: Is https://freecomicbookday.com/Catalog/DEC230025 a reliable third-party source for adding info to this article? --173.67.42.107 (talk) 07:48, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  reimagining or reboot?
Talk:My Boy Jack (poem)

message: This poem refers to the battle of Jutland and the boy sailor John Cornwell, not Kipling's son John who was never refered to as Jack.
:That seems unlikely if the poem was written in 1915 as Jack Cornwell died in June 1916 from wounds sustained in the Battle of Jutland. While Cornwell was a sailor and the poem makes frequent reference to the sea, Cornwell died and was buried in England and so there was no doubt over what had happened to him, unlike Kipling's son. The references to the sea probably allude to the fact that in those days France was really only accessible by ship from England and it took some time for news to reach the families of those serving in France/Belgium. Mztourist (talk) 13:52, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

message: When was Jack born? Does he deserve an article to himself? Drutt 17:11, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If he was 18 when he died in 1915, he must have been born in 1896 or 1897. Its not clear whether he is a notable subject, other than because of who his father was. Mztourist (talk) 13:52, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment from 2007
Talk:Ecclesiastical Licences Act 1533

message: This article in its current form (2019 May 1) is almost completely useless.
Of what value is an article that lists only the repealed sections of the law, and then only cites when and by what law they were repealed? We are left with no knowledge of what was in those repealed sections, and even less knowledge of the unlisted, uncited, and undescribed other sections presumably still in force.
An encyclopedia needs to take a different approach that looks less like a Guide to Statutes in Force. Random noter (talk) 14:37, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Showing deleted sections only
Talk:Veterinary acupuncture

message: Why is there no mention of this modality being a pseudo-science?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.161.53.229 (talk) 04:37, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello , Your edits were not reverted by bots. They were reverted by other editors who disagreed with your changes. You can discuss them here and gain consensus if you want them re-added. --McSly (talk) 17:39, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Twothirtyeight

message: When I edited this article I found that the formatting of the band's name was not very consistent. As far as I know, the name appears to be "twothirtyeight" on the actual printed albums but appears, on Tooth & Nail Records's website as "Two Thirty Eight" and, in other places, as "Twothirtyeight". I've used the latter formatting in this article but it's up for debate, I'm sure. Thecorch 17:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Twothirtyeight, twothirtyeight, Two Thirty Eight
Talk:Clancy Williams

message: The Seattle suburb mentioned in the article, was not a Seattle suburb, but a suburb of Renton, Washington called Kennydale which was north of Renton, on the other side of Lake Washington. I went to elementary school there with Clancy. but he was a few years older. I remember we used to watch him play flag football there, and he was amazing even back then when he was in the sixth grade. He was so fast and strong that he would run around and through the players who could not catch his flag. Later our parents used to take to take us to the Renton high school stadium, just so we could watch him play. It pains me, that such a great player died so young. 75.213.80.145 (talk) 09:17, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clancy Williams, Early years
Talk:See of Rome Act 1536

message: The article states what the parliament would’ve wanted it to describe. It fails to put into context England’s and Scotland’s anti-Catholicism including its treatment of Ireland. The article should at minimum acknowledge that the crown and government at this time persecuted and abused Catholics and that even today the monarch in Britain cannot be a Catholic which violates the modern norm among Western nations that freedom of religion is a fundamental right. Trwilson99 (talk) 03:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article fails to acknowledge the English and British anti-Catholic bigotry and persecution.
Talk:DVD-RW DL

message: These are not available in stores are they?
As of Early 2008, this format seems to be an incredibley rare and unsucsessful format, the DVD Forum has not seemed to have promoted them very well let alone dispatch them, I'm probably exagerating but they may have only built mock-ups of the disc type or pherhaps they have moved on to the prototype stage.
J2F Duck (talk) 22:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:President of the German Bundesrat

message: Somebody whose English is better than mine should add the fact that Jens Böhrnsen was the acting head of state in June 2010 after the resignation of President Horst Köhler. The text still says that this has never happened.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.233.203.207 (talk) 11:57, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The President of the Bundesrat was the acting head of state in June 2010. 

message: This need to be updated: Stephan Weil replaced Winfried Kretschmann on November 1st, 2013. http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pr%C3%A4sident_des_Bundesrates_(Deutschland)#Gegenw.C3.A4rtiger_Pr.C3.A4sident_des_Bundesrates
The article "Germany", and possibly other related items, require updating as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.20.197.229 (talk) 11:07, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  --Boson (talk) 20:50, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current President of the Bundesrat 
Talk:Elections in Moldova

message: I propose to remove these ones:
*Sfatul Ţării election, 1917
*Elections in the Moldavian SSR, 1940
*Elections in the Moldavian SSR, 1946
*Elections in the Moldavian SSR, 1950
*Elections in the Moldavian SSR, 1954
*Elections in the Moldavian SSR, 1958
*Elections in the Moldavian SSR, 1962
*Elections in the Moldavian SSR, 1966
*Elections in the Moldavian SSR, 1970
*Elections in the Moldavian SSR, 1974
*Elections in the Moldavian SSR, 1979
*Elections in the Moldavian SSR, 1984
The content of the first one is fork from Sfatul Ţării. The rest can be mentioned in Moldavian SSR. Dc76\talk 16:00, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:San Francisco Plaza, New Mexico

message: The location on the Map is missing and i get strange text. anyone sees why?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.44.232.97 (talk) 10:39, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Map 
Talk:Crown of Ireland Act 1542

message: My reading of  is that 1542, 33 Hen. 8: c. 1. An Act that the King of England, his Heirs and Successors, be Kings of Ireland was repealed in the Republic of Ireland in 1962, and my reading of  is that 1542 (33 Hen. 8 sess. 2) Analecta Hibernica c. 1. The King, his heirs and successors to be Kings of Ireland was repealed in the Republic of Ireland in 2007.  Hence this edit.--Rumping (talk) 20:14, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I do see your point but the lead of the article says it's about 33 Hen. 8 c. 1 and not 33 Hen. 8 sess. 2 Analecta Hibernica c. 1. The former was indisputably repealed in 1962. The latter appears to have been another statute perhaps it just said the same thing as 33 Hen. 8 c. 1 but where is the the source that says this? All we appear to know about it is that if it hadn't been repealed before 2007 it was repealed in 2007. — Blue-Haired Lawyer t 20:41, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repealed twice? 

message: Henrician Act still in effect in Northern Ireland? But wasn't the Kingdom of Ireland abolished in 1801?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.205.241.245 (talk) 06:40, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Query
Talk:Dwight Harris

message: Look for a picture of Agent Harris at the moment, if you have one please upload it and insert it!
: There is no picture of Agent Harris "at the moment" because he is a fictional charater! Alcohkid (talk) 07:33, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

message: This character is one of the main supporting chars of the series... I generally thought he deserves to have his own article... Thanks! =) Alcohkid (talk) 07:34, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I WILL SAY THIS AGAIN! This character is one of the main supporting chars of the series... I vehemently thought he deserves to have his own article... Thanks! Alcohkid (talk) 13:32, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: No to Deletion
Talk:Bismarck Monument (Hamburg)

message: I’ve moved this to Bismarck Monument per WP:UE. </br>  
And I've re-jigged some of the text for the same reason. Moonraker12 (talk) 16:17, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: I've also deleted an extended quote from something by J Heckscher (here): 
Not only was it in German, so making it inaccessible for a large proportion of the English WP's readrship, it doesn't seem to say anything of value. 
If it did have a point, perhaps someone would care to explain it here. Moonraker12 (talk) 16:23, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended quote 
Talk:Walden Belfiore

message: Does Walden deserve his own article?  He only appeared in four episodes and is a very minor character.  Many other recurring members were more significant yet do not have, or need their own article.  I suggest merging into List of Soprano crime family members.--MistaTee 00:09, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Walden is supposed to be a reincarnation of Christoper. Geeky Randy (talk) 04:48, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm an inclusionist myself, but he was quite a minor character. If he gets his own page, Mikey Palmice and Matt Bevilaqua deserve their own pages, at least. --96.52.132.224 (talk) 11:39, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  separate article?