Talk:Chicken Little (2005 film)

message: The web site "http://www.the-real-story.com/" has copied the complete text of the Wikipedia articles Chicken Little and 50 Cent and has placed its own copyright notice places on the articles. There is no email address listed on the site, but a whois on the domain turns up "IQ-TESTING-ONLINE.COM@domainsbyproxy.com" as the administrative contact. I will send a Standard GFDL violation letter there. - Brian Kendig 16:26, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation

message: According to the news, selected theatres equipped with Dolby Digital Cinema system will show this movie in 3D.  Any more info on what kind of technology is that?  Kowloonese 06:21, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: More on 3D version?

message: Does anyone know if Disney officially considers this one of The Animated Classics? As they don't even seem to differentiate between theatrical and direct-to-video titles anymore, I suspect the idea of certain theatrically-released traditional animation films being considered special is fading away. tregoweth 02:04, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind; see my comments at Talk:List of Disney animated features. tregoweth 03:28, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Canon? 

message: The german voice of Mayor Turkey Lurkey is Christian Ude the mayor of Munich.--LaWa 12:28, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: :
: Chicken Little joins his school's Little League baseball team in an attempt to recover his reputation and his father's pride, he is unfairly made last and Foxy always got the winning pitch, even when he was on it umped him or something happened and Foxy caught it with newspapers amazed by her "miracle catchs", and by batting a home run on the last match, it appears he's well on his way. But that night back at home, he is hit on the head by a strange stop-sign-shaped object which he recognizes as a piece of the sky. He summons his friends to help figure it out.
:(previous article revision)
Can anyone make sense of that passage?  I can't.  It's important to mention something of the baseball game in the plot summary, but having not seen the whole movie myself, I don't know what to replace it with.Stratadrake 00:54, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Say What? 

message: Classifying the characters in this film as male and female, and comparing it with the original fable version, how similar are the 2 lists?? Georgia guy 00:38, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Male & female characters 

message: :Image:Chicken little poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Chicken little poster.jpg

message: There's a mark next to this assertion (in the, unfortunate, Trivia section of the main article) claiming this needs to be cited.  It is actually stated in the DVD extras; they go so far in the extras as to show a short, apparently untextured rough render of the female version of the character in bed from before the concept was replaced with the male character.  I don't know how to cite this, but anyone with the DVD can verify that it's true.
I, for my part, am sorry I know this, but I'm glad to help wikipedia out. :P 74.36.50.246 17:49, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chicken Little was originally female 

message: The Trivia section mentions that this film has no humans in it whatsoever.  But isn't Harrison Ford briefly seen in the theatre during the opening scene?
:Correct. I'm not sure this piece of trivia is all that meaningful anyway. "The fifth" Disney film with no humans hardly warrants any special notice. McJaje 13:40, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Human?

message: If not it should be moved to Chicken Little (film). TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 09:38, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are any other movies with this name? 

message: This sentence makes it sound like Chicken Little was the first CGI film not created by Pixar in all of history. That is incorrect. The sentence should read something like, "Chicken Little is the first 3D movie released/published/distributed by Disney which was not created by Pixar studios." I don't know how to massage this in to the first two sentences, so I'll leave the duty to someone who cares more about this article  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.148.236.252 (talk) 14:58, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I edited the introduction to fix this problem. Ordinary Person (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The sentence is still awkward. ("This was Disney's first fully computer animated film, as Pixar's films were distributed but not produced by Disney").  This implies that Disney did not produce any Pixar films, when they did provide production $$ to Pixar in the beginning.  I'm sure the editor meant to imply that Disney did not physically work on the Pixar films, but the double-meaning of the film-production word "produce" in the sentence can be misleading. Any suggestions on how to work around that and make it better sounding? SpikeJones (talk) 05:52, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "The first fully computer animated film ANIMATED and RELEASED by Disney Feature Animation (without the involvement of an outside studio, such as Pixar)" ?? Something like that? SWatsi (talk) 21:06, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Does sound better, but there should be a way to phrase the sentence without the parenthesis.. SpikeJones (talk) 14:07, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it doesn't need the parenthesis, that really is just extra, extra explaination. I don't think it has to say that its NOT BY PIXAR if it already says WHO IT IS BY. Link Disney Feature Animation to the Animation studios page and that should also explain what is 'Disney Animation'? Just a thought. SWatsi (talk) 20:04, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the first full CGI film not created by Pixar" 

message: When will there be a Chicken Little 2?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.3.67.81 (talk) 10:16, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That is something ultimately up to Walt Disney Animation Studios to decide, and this really isn't the forum to discuss it.  --McDoobAU93 14:16, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A sequel 

message: According to the article, it says that Chicken Little was released onto VHS and DVD on March 21, 2006. However, I highly doubt that this movie would've had a wide VHS release, as the format was beginning to be discontinued around that time. Home on the Range was the last Walt Disney Animation Studios film to have a standard VHS release when it had its home media release in September 2004. If Chicken Little did have a VHS release, it probably would be like Cars and be a Disney Movie Club exclusive and would be very rare. Believe me, I've done my research on VHS releases. --JCC the Alternate Historian (talk) 15:00, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: VHS?

message: According to it's Reception info, it say's that Chicken Little currently has a 36% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Just recently now when I looked on there, it's now says it has a 37% approval rating now, the info needs to be update according to the rotten tomatoes source. 174.192.24.253 (talk) 23:56, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: - Taketa (talk) 06:51, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 December 2017 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chicken Little (2005 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160529192756/http://bvifinland.fi/uploads/text/ChickenLittle_ProdNotes.doc to http://www.bvifinland.fi/uploads/text/ChickenLittle_ProdNotes.doc
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: I feel like cutting out the part with the Chicken Little: The True Story really feels like your messing with the plot information. Is there anyway to shorten the plot a little bit to keep it in? DrkWebber (talk) 14:07, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot length 

message: Change "Runt (who a cowardly pig)" to "Runt (a cowardous pig)" 109.150.193.251 (talk) 20:11, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: M.Bitton (talk) 23:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 May 2024 

message: There is a typo in the plot summary's sentence: "Their ship have broken camo panels that fell and hit Chicke Little on the head". Can someone please add an "n" to the word "Chicken"? (ty) 2603:6010:8B00:44FF:7112:6FAD:151D:8BCE (talk) 02:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Ternera (talk) 03:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 June 2024