lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Little Yellow Jacket

message: I have categorized this article and also have linked it to some other sites.  Also to address notibility, I think that the bull is worthy due to his history, and just as Bodacious has his own page I believe Little Yellow Jacket should also.
Kirksch 21:55, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have tagged this article with  due to words such as "astonishing" and "hopefully;" in general, it reads more like a magazine article (or perhaps press release) than an encyclopedia. Matchups (talk) 03:07, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone 

message: To further address notability, this bull is notable because he is in the North Dakota Cowboy Hall of Fame, the first animal to be inducted. He was the first bull to win the PBR World Champion Bull title 3 times which he did in a row. And then in 2011, he received the PBR Brand of Honor, which is pretty much the PBR's equivalent of a Hall of Fame. Dawnleelynn (talk) 22:23, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further notability notes 

message: I started engaging in a major expansion of this article a couple days ago. It just occurred to me to document that in the talk page. That way, editors can avoid re-editing loops until the project is done. I will just note in it when I have finished. On the other hand, though, I would be happy to consider any constructive suggestions along the way, especially considering this is my first major article expansion. I have lots of source since this bull is considered to be one of the greatest bucking bulls ever. I am also planning to solve the lack of sufficient citation situation. Okay, that's it, here I go. Dawnleelynn (talk) 21:08, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I just added a good deal of content again today. I have made sure that every fact has a citation, whether I wrote it or not. Which means I got to remove the template, yay! I feel pretty sure that I am done adding any more major content for this expansion project. I will be spending the next few days just doing some editing. Mostly copy editing, and a little bit of substantive editing. I may drop a small bit of content in only if I find I missed something along the way. Also, the career section needs some organizing in terms of order of facts and paragraphs to make the information more chronological and have a smooth transition from beginning to end. Dawnleelynn (talk) 04:12, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Expansion Project
Talk:RTI Producciones

message: RTI is NOT a network, but a production company. --Julián Ortega - drop me a message 22:04, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Since this article is nothing but a list of RTI telenovelas, I have renamed it as such. Anyone willing to start an RTI page from scratch, please do. -- azumanga 01:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved article 
Talk:Penn State Nittany Lions football under Joe Paterno

message: Do we really need to go back through each line and change the final score line to "forfeit" or can we make a footnote with citation stating that all wins from 1998-2011 were vacated due to the 7/23/12 NCAA sanction? 173.86.66.61 (talk) 14:46, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that we have to (since they are no longer wins), we should also change the "Last Penn State Win" at the top to reflect the forefits.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.98.19.20 (talk) 19:06, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Vacated wins are explicitly different than forfeits; forfeits result in a change in the other team's record (that is, if a game is forfeit after the fact as the result of action by the NCAA Committee on Infractions, the result flips. In the case of a vacated win, the opposing team's record isn't affected; the game simply has no winner and wins (and ties) are removed from the penalized team's record (both for the season and all time). It wouldn't be correct to say that Kentucky won the 1999 Outback Bowl. That game simply was no winner. Noting that wins affected by the sanction are vacated is appropriate, but changing them to a "loss" isn't accurate ("forfeit" is questionable, "vacant" or "vacated" would be more accurate). That the last Penn State win occured in 1997 is accurate, though, so it might be a good idea to update that table.Murphyr (talk) 21:15, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This sounds reasonable and I've seen that somebody has started the work. I just didn't want somebody vandalizing the site in haste; just an accurate reporting of "this was the score on the field" on a given date, but now it is vacated. Thanks for the clarity on the opponents' records. Bob305 (talk) 22:07, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I just changed the "Last Penn State Win" section above to reflect the Vacated Wins, I should mention that I did most of the subtracting in my head (while glossing over each years records) while doing the percentage calculations on a calculator if anyone wishes to double-check it for accuracy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.98.19.20 (talk) 03:25, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vacated Wins vs. Forfeits 

message: The losing school in vacated games recognizes the loss. As such, Penn State would be listed as (for example) 0-5 in conference play rather than 0-8, if they won 3 games on the field and then vacated them. Six Sided Pun Vows (talk | contribs | former account) 17:05, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  VACATED GAMES ARE NOT FORFEITS 

message: It looks like I have pretty much finished re-instating the wins for Joe Paterno (I was responsible for re-instating the years from 2002 to 2011).  Thanks for letting me re-instate most of the wins, as a Penn State Grad I sort of felt it was my duty to do so :).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:B:9F01:7B70:F0E0:17F5:7C04:F085 (talk) 20:44, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reinstating of wins pretty much finished
Talk:Alfred E. Smith Building

message: Does anyone have any sources that we can use to verify when the observation deck was open and when it was finally closed? From what I understand the observation deck was closed due to lack of security stopping suicides, since it, like the Empire State Building which was built slightly later, had an open air deck, not inside behind glass like the Corning Tower.  From what I was told the Corning Tower was not originally supposed to have an observation deck but a top floor was converted to one at the last minute (which I was told is the reason the Corning Tower's observation deck does not include windows facing the west side). If you look closely you can see the railing at the top of the building where the observation deck is. I dont know if its possible for people who work there to gain access or not or if OGS (I assume that is the proper state agency that maintains jurisdiction over state office buildings) would ever let someone go up to take pictures so wikipedia could have some. Does anyone have personal knowledge of the observation deck or if its a myth or better yet some written proof?Camelbinky (talk) 00:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info on an observation deck?
Talk:Canadian Idol season 5

message: what do you think of creating an article for each of the top 22 contestants?  They'd have to start out as stubs of course.  Baiter 01:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Usually the contestants don't get their own articles unless they've gone quite far within the competition (like Top 5) or have made themselves notable for other reasons (e.g. Sanjaya Malakar).  For now, I've created redirects to this page from the names of the Top 10. ... discospinster talk 17:58, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello discospinter, We can now start working on the Brian Melo page. I know his birthday is August 15, 1982, from Hamilton, Ontario. Found that out from his friends on Facebook because his birthday is one day after mine. He's winner of season 5 and use to be a construction worker. Parents came over to Canada from Portugal. Plus I have some photos of him as well. He even has a brand new fan site online at: http://www.brian-melo.com/ Nhl4hamilton 04:38, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Aren't really conforming to the Wikipedia standards WestJet 05:13, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Judges Comments
Talk:Joseph Schuster (cellist)

message: "On a trip through Russia, the famous Russian composer Alexander Konstantinovich Glazunov (1865-1936) heard young Schuster and was impressed with his talent."  As this statement is written, Glazunov was making the trip.  If, as I suspect, the traveler was Schuster, we need something more like "When the young Schuster made a trip through Russia, Russian composer Alexander Konstantinovich Glazunov (1865-1936) heard him and was impressed with his talent."  Trouble is, I don't know which is correct, and without any references, I can't quickly check.  That raises a second, and more serious, issue: the article needs references.  I started the ball rolling by setting up the heading and adding a reference for a factoid that I added regarding a subsequent owner/user of Schuster's cello, but I fear that's just a drop in the bucket. Drhoehl (talk) 03:32, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The reason he "left" the Berlin Philharmonic in 1934 was that he was expelled due to his Jewish ancestry.
This is documented in Misha Aster's book , "The Berlin Philharmonic and the Third Reich"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.119.204.117 (talk) 04:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expelled from Berlin Phil
Talk:Aeon (album)

message: The exact date of release is completely missing. Only the year? Someone needs to get on that.
— Tha†emoover†here (talk) 22:35, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release Date
Talk:Music Idol

message: Wondering if someone should add that this version has been amazingly popular for the viral videos currently circulating around the web.  It's notable because the general consensus is that this version has been absolutely ridiculous. -Blaine  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.29.124 (talk) 15:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viral Videos? 

message: It's already covered in the article. Do we really need it? And it doesn't look good too. Tsvetan93 (talk) 09:17, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finalists (in the show info box) - Do we need it? 
Talk:John Harding, 1st Baron Harding of Petherton

message: Might be worth noting that he was one of the fast-track students at the Indian Staff College in 1936-7, being instructed by Monty, who feared he would be too old for the forthcoming war, and put his heart and soul into teaching these young high-flyers.
Harding and his colleagues were the ones who defended Monty's reputation in 1939-40 when a lot of top brass wanted him out.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.244.180 (talk) 00:03, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mutual influence on Monty 

message: It seemed odd that he had time to attend KCL, when he left school at 15 and joined the army at 18. This is cited to the DNB (but the claim predates the citation). I have tried to verify this information, but all the indications are that it is incorrect. There is no mention of KCL in another publisher biography I found . He is not included in the list of matriculated students of the University of London who served in WWI , which he should have been if he had joined KCL before giving into the army. KCL do not list him as one of their notable alumni , which given that they claim famous people who attended evening classes at the college on that page would really be expected. Could somebody with a British library subscription check what the DNB actually says? Robminchin (talk) 05:11, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Heathcote does not mention KCL either: it seems unlikely and I have removed it. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 10:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  King's College London?
Talk:List of Australian Test batsmen who have scored more than 5000 Test runs

message: This list does have defined membership criteria, and a reasonable chance of being maintainable. 5000 is an arbitrary number, but is recognised as a significant achievemnet for a batsman. Here is a better set of data, but I don't presently have time to format it properly for the page. I captured it from the referenced website, pasted it into Excel for sorting, then dumped the batting-related columns here. --Scott Davis Talk 22:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod response
Talk:Jabril ibn Bukhtishu

message: Please provide valid sources for controversial edits. --Mardavich 22:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He was Syriac perhaps originally  from southern Iran (Ahwaz)however he was not Persian because he never wrote in Persian he only wrote in Arabic and Syriac (from wikipedia), also i added one source in one of these articles (Bakhtishu)and i'll try to find more sources later --Aziz1005 00:16, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sibawayh, who originally developed Arabic grammar was also not an Arab, but a Persian. And the Syriac tongue is no stranger to Iran, since Pahlavi derives its script and much of its vocabulary from written Imperial Aramaic, from which is of the Syriac family. Aramaic was in fact a tongue spoken in the Persian Imperial courts as well.. Hope this helps clear the confusion.--Zereshk 09:07, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

text: The homeland of Syriac and Aramic people is Syria .And  the name Bakhtishu according to (كتاب عيون الأنباء في طبقات الأطباء) Kitab oyoon al anbaa fe tabaqat al atebaa from the 12th century for ابن أبي أصيبعة ibn abi usaybia means ومعنى بختيشوع عبد المسيح لأن في اللغة السريانية البخت العبد ويشوع عيسى عليه السلام  (servant of  Jesus) in Syriac language . also you should mention that Yuhanna ibn Bukhtishu became Bishop of Mousel (893 CE) (northern Iraq) الموصل العراق  .Also this family moved to Baghdad and later on to Northern Syria .Hope this helps to expand the articles --Aziz1005 15:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added your info to the Bukhtishu article.--Zereshk 21:07, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:History of Milwaukee

message: This article needs an introduction. Other contents are the same as that in the history section of Milwaukee.Miaers 23:54, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction

message: Obviously Juneau was not the first person or even the first white person to come to Milwaukee. The native americans were the first people to come to the Milwaukee area. In the Pre-1800 section, it outlines the Europeans who first came to the city. Juneau was the first to found the settlement of Milwaukee but a claim cannot be made that he was the first to come to Milwaukee. Perhaps a claim could be made that he was the first "founding father" to come to Milwaukee but that needs to be specifically stated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by PaulRaunette (talk • contribs) 17:00, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Solomon Juneau
Talk:Charlie Matco

message: Strongly support merge – There is absolutely no reason for this pseudonym to have a seperate article, except as an attempt to make it more difficult to root out non-notable content by spreading it out at much as possible. — Swpb talk contribs 22:24, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is that with the spat on keeping or deleting the Terry Shannon article, these references to the infamous "Charlie Matco" have been deleted. The fact that one of the coffee mugs is now on display in the Computer History Museum in and by itself makes this entry notable. Discpad 12:53, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Fort Nassau (North River)

message: The article states that Fort Nassau was built "near" Albany, NY.  The fort was built on Castle Island, and Castle Island is today better known as the Port of Albany and is within the city of Albany.  Another name for Castle Island is Waterloo Island (with or without two o's).24.182.142.254 (talk) 01:33, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Castle Island issue

message: Where was Fort Nassau (South)?  There is no article of that name and I can not find any references to it.  The wikipedia New Netherlands project has it listed but no article of that name.  Camelbinky (talk) 01:53, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fort Nassau (South River), among others. — LlywelynII 12:28, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Fort Nassau (South)

message: There were hatnotes here and at Hendrick Christiaensen: aside from the fact I oppose (both are notable; the stub at Christiaensen can be expanded but is no reason to merge), there were no arguments at all presented on either page to justify the merge. Removed the notes. — LlywelynII 12:18, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with founder
Talk:Phred quality score

message: Hi, please don't delete my page, I am new to this and am trying to create a tutorial page on how to use a Phred score- a molecular biology tool currently used by much of the academic community.
:Tutorial pages fall under the "instruction manual" clause of WP:NOT.  Wikibooks is a better place to put the material.  ColourBurst 23:10, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I corrected some factual errors in the "history" section (gleaned from the documentation and commercial distributor), but it occurred to me that this article is really more about the program "Phred" itself, of which the quality scores are evidently only one aspect of. The article should probably be re-configured (and re-titled) appropriately – feel free to do so. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 15:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs Basic Overhaul

message: I followed Agricola44's suggestion and split this article into two pages - one describing the program Phred titled Phred base calling, and one (this one) that just concentrates on quality scores. A lot of the original content was moved to Phred base calling. Added some historic information and relevant citations. Genomesequencer (talk) 16:49, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overhauled: split off description of Phred 

message: Base 79 of the image is called as G even though it's blatently A. Having worked with chromatograms all summer I find it hard to believe Phred would mess this one up... has the file definitely not been edited or anything? Evercat (talk) 19:48, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: This seems to be a term that non-experts would not know about. It is used in the first paragraph.
-DW  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.151.110.58 (talk) 05:18, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is an "sequencer trace?"
Talk:Alice Anderson

message: The article is currently written like a (gushing) review.  "She has an amazing way of telling stories", for example, is a subjective opinion, not a verifiable fact.  Most of the article is about as far from a neutral point of view as you can get.  I'd do some more cleanup, but I'm a bit short on time right now.  Xtifr tälk 22:27, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Inappropriate tone

message: Various sites indicate her birth year as 1976 Saatchi Cinematheque art-action. More reliable refs would be useful, though. Dl2000 (talk) 04:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: DOB check
Talk:HMS Defiance (1861)

message: Is this photo this Defiance? If so the caption on Commons (and on the IWM website) is incorrect as it had been scrapped by the Second World War.Nigel Ish (talk) 16:20, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: what happend to it 2A02:C7E:3119:900:B4F9:6A5A:1EF5:FF1E (talk) 09:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paper weight
Talk:Jules Chevalier

message: I've changed the "Holy picture" image of Jules Chevalier to a photo. Popular images of both holy people and revolutionaries are tinkered with to convey their propaganda. A photo never lies. The image being shown showed wavy brown, brown hair and not a wrinkle or crease anywhere. We editors should be very careful of using such images, especially when photographic images are available. A photograph is a primary source of information, whereas a drawing, painting or manipulated photograph, can - at best - be only a secondary source ... perhaps it's been changed several times ... perhaps the head doesn't belong to the body, etc etc. Francis Hannaway (talk) 22:16, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo trumps drawing/painting
Talk:Hang Em High (EP)

message: Could someone move this page to Hang Em High, as that's how it's spelled on the cover. Thanks. 88.107.174.42 (talk) 11:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alice de Janzé

message: I can't do it 
Spicer, Paul (2010). The Temptress: The scandalous life of Alice, Countess de Janzé. London: Simon & Schuster. .
and there is a link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fr%C3%A9d%C3%A9ric_de_Janz%C3%A9  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.104.57.144 (talk) 06:22, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 

message: Why people says "De Janzé" when it's spelled "Janzé", without the "of", when the title is not here?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.91.51.235 (talk) 04:53, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Count of Janzé
Talk:Dockerty Cup

message: Most of what I considered to be the pertinent information from FFV State Knockout Cup I've already copied to the Dockerty Cup page some time ago. Perhaps there's more to come, but the detail on the format for the old competition is perhaps no longer relevant or as relevant today.  Matilda Maniac (talk) 07:07, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I think these should definitely be merged in.  If there are no additional comments in the next week or so I might just make the change.  --TinTin (talk) 06:21, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  .  Nothing worth keeping from the FFV State Knocout Cup that wasn't already replicated on the Dockerty Cup article, or the specific season articles. --TinTin (talk) 06:55, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:New York Court of Appeals

message: I was wondering if any of the editors here know when Court of Appeals judgments become final. Specifically, does Lt. Gov. Ravich become entitled to preside over the Senate immediately, or only after 30 days when the time to file for rehearing is past? -Rrius (talk) 21:07, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finality of orders 

message: Why did Judges of the Court of Appeal stop being elected in 1974?
Was the State Constitution amended? 213.205.240.185 (talk) 23:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Election

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
* Oppose. Although they use that at some locations on their Web site, WP policy and practice is to use the most common name, which is the New York Court of Appeals.  Furthermore, the official name is actually the Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Both usages are present in their annual reports: the official name in more formal passages and the common name in less formal ones. --Coolcaesar (talk) 07:45, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey