Talk:Roll Over Beethoven

message: i don't know about elo, but the beatles pronunciation, seems spot on. 'move on up,just a trifle futher', comes out pretty clearly—Preceding unsigned comment added by Thelegendofrory (talk • contribs) 11:00, 27 July 2007
:I agree (referring to the version on With the Beatles).  Arguably, the "a" is elided, but I've removed the mention.—Dah31 (talk) 04:37, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: He was probably talking about ELO's version, not Chuck Berry's. Stonemason89 (talk) 21:11, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Berry recorded several versions, with a 1972 live video performance with very clear pronunciation: he is clearly pronouncing the word with an initial 'zh', or even 'dj' affricate plosive, answering to Tch- . The following vowel nucleus is reduced to schwa, which is more conformable to a reduced 'ai', than a reduced, but still slightly lip-rounded 'o'. Live, 1972, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sij1R6cjh4A If paused at the 1:00 mark and set at .25 speed it is even absolutely clear there is lip-spreading on the vowel, conclusively diagnostic of an intentional (reduced) 'ai'. JohndanR (talk) 22:38, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I created a template for The Beatles' album With The Beatles so that there is no break between the previous track Please Mister Postman and the following track Hold Me Tight. The only minor problem is that there is no listing of the other tracks on the album, because that would take up too much vertical space. (The other songs on the album have articles with a template that lists all of the tracks on the album.) DAK4Blizzard (talk) 09:10, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Does the infobox really have to be all the way down there. For most other articles of song The Beatles covered, the infoboxes were grouped together, so that they would go down consecutively down the side of the article. Why not do that? Democraticmacguitarist (talk) 13:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it doesn't have to be way down there. The page works better with the infoboxes stack on top of each other, and I am going to change it. — John Cardinal (talk) 14:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Template for The Beatles

message: "Rockin' pneumonia"  refer to Huey "Piano" Smith's "Rocking Pneumonia and the Boogie Woogie Flu".  
I removed this, because it's demonstratively false. Chuck Berry's song came out in 1956; the Huey "Piano" Smith recording wasn't made until 1957. If anything, the reference should be the other way around: Perhaps the Smith song was influnenced by Berry? There's no way Berry got the reference from Huey Smith unless he was clairvoyant. Cheemo 04:20, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rockin' pneumonia

message: :Image:ChuckBerryRollOverBetthovenLabel.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:ChuckBerryRollOverBetthovenLabel.jpg

message: "A Shot of Rhythm and Blues" was not written by Alexander but by members of his band, so what is said in the article is not true.Suso de la Vega (talk) 03:50, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: A Shot of Rhythm and Blues

message: To whoever wrote that The Tennessee Waltz is an example of "a song about songs" needs to back that up.  That seems dubious to me. The title of the song references the song that  was playing when a "friend stole" a "sweetheart" from the  speaker.  The song title is therefore just a reference point for  the speaker. --Jackbox1971 (talk) 01:39, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Tennessee Watlz: Metasong?

message: The citation for rs500s, (), does not seem to have the cited comparison between the intros to Johnny B. Goode and Roll Over Beethoven. Peaceray (talk) 08:26, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  rs500s does not have comparison cited 

message: A black musician singing about his hate against white man's music...if that isn't RACISM, what is? 93.219.135.34 (talk) 09:20, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Dunno. What is what? This is an article about the song "Roll Over Beethoven". You need to find the article about the musician/singing that you have in mind. I don't know of any such, so I can't help you any further. JohndanR (talk) 22:09, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  racist song? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Roll Over Beethoven. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604173020/http://www.rollingstone.com:80/music/lists/the-500-greatest-songs-of-all-time-20110407/chuck-berry-roll-over-beethoven-19691231 to http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/the-500-greatest-songs-of-all-time-20110407/chuck-berry-roll-over-beethoven-19691231
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:18, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This song bears a remarkable resemblance to the earlier Honey Hush, by Big Joe Turner: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLYkj2MDS6E  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:205:3:DEE2:A5EA:5EB4:D8F5:C3E3 (talk) 02:58, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honey Hush 

message: Yes, this is how it's commonly interpreted, and not just on Wikipedia - I can find several books from the 1990s making this assertion too. But is there any reliable secondary source that this is what Berry really meant? Could it not just be that Beethoven should move over and make room? --Rpresser 13:53, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I am also rather sceptical about this. Some contemporaneous evidence would be needed, surely? Francis Davey (talk) 22:04, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

text: The English idiom to roll over in one's grave is an expression of disapproval because of a contemporary development. It reflects the object's will to resist the development, not their willingness to acquiesce. Further inclusion of such "willingness" must include a citation. These pages are read by non-native speakers perhaps unfamiliar with the idiom and it does them a disservice to lead them astray. ReedScarce (talk) 13:03, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does it really mean Beethoven should roll over *in his grave*? 

message: Should Roll Over Beethoven (Beatles cover) have been split from this article per WP:SONGCOVER? It has been done with significant cover versions of other songs, but I thought there should be a discussion since it is not often done and generally discouraged. Thanks. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 15:44, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: (Transcluded from talk page) As the creator of this article, I don't think the article should be merged back into the Roll Over Beethoven article. While it's true that the content here is primarily lifted from that article, this cover version has enough long lasting significance to warrant a spinoff from the main article, particularly as a cover song by a very notable band (The Beatles), and has room for expansion by connection to the wide bibliography available about the band's songs. I also believe the article in its current form, irrespective of the potential of expansion, meets the notability requirement at WP:NSONGS, and therefore passes the criteria you mentioned. Bandit Heeler (talk) 11:10, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Beatles version