lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Elysia chlorotica

message: It may make it's own chlorophyll  - http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/01/green-sea-slug/ - 208.71.237.254 (talk) 16:41, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Makes it's own chlorophyll? 

message: I find the section on the Feeding mechanism of the Elysia chlorotica unclear. First it says that the slug is capable of assimilating and using the chloroplasts of the algae Vaucheria litorea for it's self. Next there is a large technical paragraph (about the expreience of Sven Gould) (There are no references about this) which says that slugs that can use chloroplasts do not seam to have any advantage as compared to the ones that can not. Does Elysia chlorotica feed through photosynthesis?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sethyvenatem (talk • contribs) 15:16, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feeding section 

message: For the life cycle section, it could use more information, most of the information is about feeding, while the other sections lack the amount of attention that this section does. This article could also talk about any other uses for the chlorophyll besides for feeding purposes. This article could also talk about how the slug came about getting this unique ability.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larentap (talk • contribs) 02:17, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions 

message: Cannot find a definition of the word Elysia, so saying Elysia chlorotica have a typical elysiid shape is self-referential. I suspect this may come from the source's having confused it with the geometric three-dimensional shape ellipsoid. If it come from Elysium or the Elysian Fields (Ancient Greek: Ἠλύσιον πεδίον, Ēlýsion pedíon) that is no help, for Elysian is not itself Greek, but of unknown origin and meaning. That may indeed have a bearing on the selection of the name, but without a better source, the simplest move would be to change elysiid to ellipsoidal. —Pawyilee (talk) 08:17, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elysia 

message: what sources support the claims of the photosynthesis abilities? 2A0D:6FC2:4470:1601:FCCA:389D:C3A9:DC85 (talk) 19:50, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photosynthesis?
Talk:Elysia viridis

message: Though the references are solid, this article lacks considerable amount of vital information, e.g. more consistent info about life Cycle, detailed ecology, anatomical description and such. It also lacks illustration. By all means feel free to undo the reassessment if you don't agree.--Daniel Cavallari (talk) 15:51, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A comment on the reassessment
Talk:Roy A. Tucker

message: FYI, if you have this page in the OS, his death is not reported. Here on Wikidata I put some sources about it. It occurred on March 5th, probably, but I kept it more generic since I cannot be 100% sure.--Alexmar983 (talk) 17:44, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please update
Talk:Glaucidae

message: As it turns out, neither Cratena nor Caloria belong here. Any chance someone with B&R can check the genera remaining for correctness? Seascapeza (talk) 14:57, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Further problems with classification

message: This page seems to have a huge overlap with Facelinidae, so I presume that is where everything else was now supposed to have been shuffled? 
Shall we just scrap this page, and replace it by merging Glaucus and Glaucilla both to here instead? (How much of what is known about those two is common, and how much is different between them? So, to minimise content duplication..) Cesiumfrog (talk) 04:32, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: By the way, here's a source affirming that Glaucidae has been emptied out, and here is the main source which made Glaucilla obsolete. Cesiumfrog (talk) 22:21, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  post Facelinidae
Talk:Wire Pass Trailhead

message: Uhh... who put that in there? "Written like an advertisement." It's not a commercial interest. It's a National Monument.  Removed that idiotic banner. Wikitards at work. 
Darrellx (talk) 14:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written like an advertisement -  Really? It's a National Monument...
Talk:TJ Woods

message: I have placed merger tags on a number of character articles. Rather than repeat the reasoning on each talk page I have set out the full argument here. Please feel free to leave comments either on this talk page or at the WikiProject. I want to try and start a debate about the whole way in which Emmerdale information is provided on Wikipedia --Amxitsa 19:44, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merger
Talk:Papawera zelandiae

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:56, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Ouachita National Recreation Trail

message: This section needs to have some descriptive info added, perhaps on the model of Appalachian Trail#Lodging_and_camping. I'll leave that for someone with more familiarity with the area and the shelters themselves. I'm just a poor failed thru-OT hiker (early 1990s) who got washed off of the trail by storms, but I plan to get back and try again some day, hence my interest in the subject. TY!
Dave (talk) 17:57, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shelters section 

message: The OT is nicely mapped at OpenStreetMap.
Or perhaps a better way: .
Dave (talk) 00:50, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  OpenStreetMap
Talk:Bolinus brandaris

message: I would like to see more than its shell. Is there a picture of the snail out of it's shell? --Hitsuji Kinno 19:35, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures of the snail?

message: It says the snail is extinct on the east coast of the mediterranean but what about the rest of the world? 213.55.221.178 (talk) 08:08, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extinction Status?
Talk:Golden Age of Latin literature

message: While the term Golden Age persists mostly in older publications, the accepted term in the field is now Augustan. I propose that the page be renamed to reflect this fact. If there are no serious objections, I will do this after March 7, 2007. --Nefasdicere 19:26, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "the accepted term in the field is now Augustan". Are you sure? I thought the Augustan period was simply the latter part of the Golden Age. How are Lucretius, Catullus, Cicero and Julius Caesar "Augustan"? --Folantin 19:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Fallen Idols (CSI)

message: Should the page not reference TV.com as the extract is word for word. Specifically http://www.tv.com/csi/fallen-idols/episode/959181/summary.html?tag=ep_list;title;16
:the recommend links (see e.g. Cross Jurisdictions) includes a TV.com link. However, if it is taken word for word from TV.com that is copyright violation and needs to go. I've had a look and can't see the similarity so I assume it has changed. If there are problems like this report them to the CSI Wikiproject and someone will look into it. Link in the header above. (Emperor 19:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As cool as this article is at explaining the plot of this CSI episode, does this information really deserve to be in an encyclopedia?  Does an episode from the CSI TV show deserve a whole page just for itself.  I have seen smaller movie plots than this one.  I would have settled on one long page with all the season's episodes, talking about the basic plots of each one.
Does this really belong in an encyclopedia? Fiver2552 (talk) 23:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whole Episode Page
Talk:Yuriy Oliynyk

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 20:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Mykola Leontovych

message: There's a "Semen Barmotin" in text. In , (ref name="composers"), spelled as "С.Бармотіним", and it seems not a general name splling . In other hands, Semyon Barmotin is in wikipedia. (here is the spelling , БАРМОТИН Семён). Are these two people the same person? --Suisui (talk) 03:28, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semen Barmotin? 

message: The lead lists his death date as 23 January 1921.  However, the body says he was murdered on "the night of 22/23 January 1921", but then later says he was shot at "7.30 in the morning".  The date and time of day are inconsistent. —Bagumba (talk) 17:54, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death date conflict
Talk:Landsberg Prison

message: Due to reasons stated here and here, the hanging picture in the article appears to be from Landsberg prison and also shows Karl Morgenschweis, but not Franz Strasser. I could not find information on who is being hanged here. I will thus change the caption of that picture to refer to an unidentified war criminal. Ception (talk) 14:52, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The hanged man in the photo is not Franz Strasser 
Talk:Julie Enfield Investigates

message: I could not see how the article could be a stub - it contains just about all the publically available information.  Frankly, the distincitions between B and A class seem just plain nitpicking at the level of detail available for a short, not-well-known, radio series Brunnian (talk) 11:58, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hydrobiidae

message: The phrase "This family was originally named by........ between the Lithoglyphi and Ancyloti." appears to have been taken from Kabat & Hershler's "The Prosobranch Snail Family Hydrobiidae (Gastropoda: Rissooidea): Review of Classification and Supraspecific Taxa" (page 3), which was already referenced twice in this section of the article. The name there is Troschel, not Stimpson. And it seems to me that the phrase should either be quoted as is or left out altogether.
In the 2013 paper describing the new hydrobiid genus Karucia, Glöer and Pešić consider Troschel the family authority and so do Wilke et al. (2001), also referenced in the Taxonomy section of the article; however, Bouchet & Rocroi's 2005 Classification and Nomenclator of Gastropod Families, as well as most online databases (ITIS, Catalogue of Life, GBIF, WoRMS etc.), credit Stimpson with that. So the family authority in the taxobox can remain as it is, at least for now. XenoVon (talk) 09:54, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomy: Troschel vs. Stimpson
Talk:Martin Bodenham

message: I have followed all known conventions in submitting this article - however, please notify me here or here first if you believe it requires modification, or indeed if it is nominated for deletion. Refsworldlee(chew-fat)(eds) 19:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hawkhurst

message: This is my first proper foray into Wiki editing so thought I should bring my quite minor point here. The sentence "By 1745 it is estimated[citation needed] that 20,000 people were smuggling along the Kent and Sussex coast line."  appears to be based on information from Geoffrey Morley's 'The Smuggling War' but a review of this book in Policing and War in Europe (ed. by Louis Knafla) points out several errors made by Morley including the specific 'A witness before the 1745 Committee of Enquiry reckoned there were 20,000 smugglers in Britain, not just on the Sussex coast'. This being the case would it be best to change the sentence to something like:
'A witness before a 1745 Committee of Enquiry estimated there were 20,000 smugglers operating in Britain.'
This I think addresses the fact that not only was it throughout Britain but mentions the fact that it was a primary source that gave us this estimate and so is not 100% reliable.
Like I said this my first edit so I'll wait for comments but if I don't receive any I'll go ahead and change it. Thanks Riled Ignatius (talk) 15:44, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation Needed 

message: The use of this name is inappropriate, The Kingdom of Kent was never conquered by the Nirmans, hence the county's motto "Invicta" (unconquered). The correct appellation is either William the Norman or William the Bastard.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.68.218.183 (talk) 15:41, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  William the Conqueror
Talk:2006–07 Minnesota Wild season

message: I've added 'all' the Wild captains of this season. I'll add 'all' the alternates later (when they're available, at Minnesota Wild official website). GoodDay 02:05, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Captains & Alternats
Talk:Hermann Oberth Space Travel Museum

message: "Space Travel Museum"? Really? Unfortunately the museum doesn't seem to have an English webpage, so I can't tell if that's an official designation. Certainly keeping the original German name would be better than inventing some unofficial translation, when dealing with an institution's proper name. --BjKa (talk) 14:26, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lemma
Talk:Fissurellidae

message: Part of this article was based on the corresponding article in Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 , which is not compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. This article has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites or books as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Invertzoo (talk) 21:37, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: "For respiration, the shells of fissurellids have a single apical or subapical perforation ("keyhole")."
interestingly, there are fissurellidae that do not have the "keyhole", like Scutus breviculus.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.150.112.111 (talk) 22:34, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  common biology
Talk:Knobbed whelk

message: The photo attached to this article is NOT a knobbed whelk, it is a lightning whelk.
A knobbed whelk has more prominent knobs, but more importantly the aperture of the shell is on the wrong side for a knobbed whelk. A knobbed whelk opens to the right while a lightning whelk opens to the left.
Furthermore, the knobbed whelk is NOT the largest whelk species. The lightning whelk gets up to 16 inches (and I have such a specimen myself) whereas the knobbed whelk tops out at 12 inches.
See this page for more info:'
http://crd.dnr.state.ga.us/content/displaycontent.asp?txtDocument=367
Note that the the distinctive coloration that gives the lightning whelk its name, as obvious in the photo of the page linked to above, typically fades as the whelk reaches the upper limits of its size, which is why the lightning whelk shown in the photo on the knobbed whelk page is whitish.
*Added new photo of two knobbed whelk shells found on the beach. Geoff T C  23:13, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Igor Markevitch

message: There is a good deal to be done here, mostly in the realm of additional information; some bits need rewriting too. I will do what I can when I can, but I urge those with more knowledge to jump in too! --Wspencer11 (talk to me...) 17:09, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  State of the article 

message: Why not use the musical artist biographical infobox for this article? There apparently seems to a problem about using it. --Boguslav 01:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  infobox 

message: The whole "Igor Markevitch descends from a Jewish merchant" thing is still not actually fleshed out in any of those links. All they say is that the "Markevitch" family may or may not be descended from a Jewish forebearer. That information is interesting but how it's relevant specficially to Igor Markevitch and not the dozens of other famous people who come from this family I don't understand. So I propose to simply put in this article that Igor descends from the famous Markevitch family and then make a separate page for the family, where we included this information about them possibly deriving from a Jewish forebearer. 160.39.224.243 (talk) 21:35, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to make [[Markevitch]] page

message: The Wikipedia article on the kidnapping and murder of Aldo Moro has a section on an alleged involvement of this composer with the brigades, not mentioned here.
Kidnapping and murder of Aldo Moro#Role of Igor Markevitch Claverhouse (talk) 12:00, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The way that section was written does not make clear what Markevitch had to do with Moro's murder. It seems to tease that he allowed his house to be used, but how and why isn't explained. The Corriere della Sera citation is offline, but I think I have access to its online archive. Will check later. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 15:46, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red Brigades
Talk:Erching transmitter

message: I'm working on this but need to do a little research to clear up some points.--killing sparrows (chirp!) 23:39, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyedit 

message: Presently, they are dependent on the German Federal Intelligence Agency.   What do you mean ? thisisace 22:28, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit

message: What frequency was used ? What languages were carried on LW ? 213.40.103.188 (talk) 12:37, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Frequency for VOA

message: The link opens the wrong place (Erching in France), but I do not know how to change it. Most likely because there is no en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erching page. There is a correct German one, however: de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erching  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.158.23.122 (talk) 13:19, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to Erching
Talk:Ahlden House

message: I've called this Ahlden House because it's a country house and that's what they're usually called in English. It's definitely not a castle, for which the usual German word is Burg not Schloss. A schloss can be a palace, a stately home or country house. Sometimes they are referred to as "Foo Castle" because they were converted from a Burg and the name has stuck. --Bermicourt (talk) 11:58, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Metacomet-Monadnock Trail

message: It would be great if someone expanded the article in the following ways:
* More information on species and habitat. 
* More specific information on the geology of the upland plateau region.
* More specific information on conservation history.
* Other historic locations on the trail.
* More information on the genesis of the trail.
--Pgagnon999 (talk) 20:17, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article expansion 
Talk:New Palace, Stuttgart

message: Is 'New Castle' the official translation of 'Neues Schloss'? I'm only asking because this type of building would usually be called a palace in English, not a castle, and 'Schloss' can refer to both castles and palaces. Jammycaketin (talk) 21:37, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This issue has come up on other nearby castles - such as Castle Solitude. In this instance it is the reference to the older, fortified and castle-like Altes Schloss that made the continuation of the castle name logical. See also the Stuttgart tourism page (though their English isn't good, this is the name they use too): Stuttgart Tourism. Also worth noting: Castle Howard in North Yorkshire. BuzzWoof (talk) 13:50, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the explanation. Jammycaketin (talk) 21:20, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Although, their own website:  calls it the New Palace. MorganaFiolett (talk) 08:44, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

text:  And the German Tourist Board  also uses Palace. MorganaFiolett (talk) 08:47, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's really interesting, Morgana Fiolett. Thanks for pointing that out! I also noticed that the official website lists the Altes Schloss as the 'Old Palace', not 'Castle', and Schloss Solitude has become 'Solitude Palace'. If Staatliche Schloesser und Gaerten Baden-Wuerttemburg refers to them as palaces on their official websites then it's certainly worth considering referring to them as palaces on Wikipedia. Just a thought. Jammycaketin (talk) 13:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

text:  1) There was an old castle. It was replaced by the locals, without changing the format of the name in German. It's a new castle. In the article it clearly states "The castle, which is more of a palace, stands adjacent to..." BuzzWoof (talk) 08:03, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

text: New Castle is a bad translation, and apparently not the most common English language name. The "Castle" Howard argument is weak because that is just about the only post medieval classical building in England called a castle: nearly all classical mansions in England are called "house" or "hall", and nearly all the post-medieval buildings named "X Castle" are gothic. Therefore I am going to move the article to New Palace (Stuttgart), though I do wonder if using the German name might not be a better option. Luwilt (talk) 20:07, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Castle?
Talk:Poor Relatives

message: Left filmimage tag here, reaaly needs better resolution pic. SkierRMH 08:29, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled