lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Henry Fitzalan-Howard, 15th Duke of Norfolk

message: Just a note for whoever authored some recent anonymous edits: this article is not a vehicle for airing the historical grievances which British Catholics may hold against the Church of England or the British government, regardless of the legitimacy of those grievances. The facts themselves are quite compelling enough without editorialising with phrasing such as "[the universities had been] wrested from the Church by Henry VIII and filled with anti-Catholic bigotry for centuries". This is not encyclopedic writing, and any future edits of this nature will be reverted.
Null Strand (talk) 12:40, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Editorialising
Template talk:Cryptography navbox

message: In the current crypto navbox the row on MACs looks like this:
  DAA   CBC-MAC   HMAC   OMAC/CMAC    PMAC   VMAC    UMAC   Poly1305-AES
Indeed, the designs of OMAC and CMAC are quite similar and these MACs should be grouped together (with the slash).
However, VMAC and UMAC are even closer (basically, it's the same design for a different word length), so I propose to group them together as well: "UMAC/VMAC".
Ultimately, one should think about putting the UMAC and VMAC related contents onto a single wiki page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.219.148.47 (talk) 23:58, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unifying VMAC and UMAC
Talk:Henry Goulburn

message: ==Untitled==
I have changed Victoria to William IV as monarch during 1834-35; I'm not entirely sure how the heir to the throne could have suddenly decided become her aging uncle who appointed Peel for his first term as Prime Minister - especially when she would have been to young to sit on the throne without a regent, notwithstanding William IV's death only coming in 1837!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.57.195 (talk) 16:45, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Reigning Monarchs

message: I have changed Victoria to William IV as monarch during 1834-35; I'm not entirely sure how the heir to the throne could have suddenly decided become her aging uncle who appointed Peel for his first term as Prime Minister - especially when she would have been to young to sit on the throne without a regent, notwithstanding William IV's death only coming in 1837!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.57.195 (talk) 16:45, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Henry Grey, 1st Duke of Kent

message: The genealogy of the article is somewhat strange. At Trent Park, Barnet EN4 0JY, England, there is the memorial obelisk to George Grey, Earl of Harold. The inscription reads "To the memory of the birth of George Grey Earl of Harold Son of Henry and Sophia Duke and Duchess of Kent. 1702." 
This does not seem to accord with the dates given for the marriages of Henry Duke of Kent.
GaryGMason (talk) 15:26, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

message: What was he styled as his father's heir apparent? Previous heirs to Earls of Kent seem to used the style "Lord Ruthin" (based on the Barony of Grey of Ruthin, even though the 8th Earl was the last actually to hold that title) - was the same true here? And in the short period between succeeding his mother and succeeding his father, did he continue to use whatever courtesy title he was using, or did he switch to his substantive title as Lord Lucas?
(That last question may even be based on a false premise: we state here: "He succeeded his father as 12th Earl of Kent in 1702, having succeeded his mother as 2nd Baron Lucas earlier the same year." However, his father died on 19 August 1702, but we have his mother dying both on 1 November 1702 (the same year as his father, but a later date) and "in November 1700" (earlier than his father, but in a different year). Something is definitely not right somewhere.) Proteus (Talk) 13:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style before/during 1702
Talk:Gunbar, New South Wales

message: I stewed on the Riverina rating of this town a fair bit ending up choosing Mid because of its relationship to William Jackson, VC (given how few VC's there are in Australian Military History).  I have no problem with a Riverina rating that is lower (based on the town being a Ghost Town) but just thought I would leave my rationale on this page.--VS talk 23:08, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand where you are coming from, but perhaps we should include William Jackson (Victoria Cross) in the Riverina project as a Mid rating.  The town was never much and it is literally a deserted hall, an attractive and well maintained church and some tennis courts now.--Mattinbgn/ talk 23:46, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep fair call.  Notice you have already - well done.--VS talk 00:24, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Riverina Rating
Talk:Cour'souvra

message: I did my best to fix this up, but it'd be good if someone familiar with these books could look it over and make sure I didn't make any glaring errors. --Alynna 01:39, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just added a few more details on the back of what Alynna has already done - I think we can remove the 'stub' and 'expert required' tags now? SparrowsWing 21:09, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  I took off the expert tag, but I think this is still a stub -- that doesn't mean it's a bad article, just that it's short. --Alynna 03:01, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert needed
Talk:Henry Hardinge, 1st Viscount Hardinge

message: Recently the files below were uploaded and they appear to be relevant to this article and not currently used by it. If you're interested and think they would be a useful addition, please feel free to include any of them.
File:Henry Hardinge, 1st Viscount Hardinge of Lahore by Sir Francis Grant.jpg
File:Henry Hardinge, 1st Viscount Hardinge of Lahore by William Salter.jpg
Dcoetzee 10:00, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New files 

message: Hardinge's term as Governer General of India is given here as 1848. But he has returned England in 1847 December itself and Dalhousie taken his place in 1848 January. (source). Do we need to change the year to 1847? --Vssun (talk) 14:12, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe Hardinge handed over to Dalhousie on 12 January 1848, see List of Governors-General of India, which means that 1848 is correct, though only just. Apuldram (talk) 09:37, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  1848/1847 
Talk:Henry Herbert, 4th Earl of Carnarvon

message: Because this is too long to put in an edit summary
# I have removed the historic Hansard source from the external links section. The article discusses the long parliamentary and ministerial career Lord Carnarvon had, but historic Hansard contradicted all of this. It listed  him as making 0 contributions. Obviously this is untrue, a thorough search of Hansard will show hundreds of contributions over 36 years. Historic Hansard can be useful, but somewhat unreliable. It is not proactively maintained, errors aren't being corrected, and it doesn't always connect spoken contributions with profiles. Because there are other good sources, I think it's safe to drop one that could be considered misleading or incorrect.
# I found it quite interesting in my search that Lord Carnarvon had such an immediate impact on politics, both taking his seat and following the Queen's Speech on the same day. Perhaps this could be elaborated on more, and how it came to be that Lord Aberdeen invited him into the political forefront. 
Editing with Eric (talk) 11:02, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historic Hansard 

message: The titles after the name are not shown in the preview. Because of this there are two commas in a row. I looked around at other articles and found that, for example, "Prince Edward, Duke of Kent and Strathearn" does not have this problem. So evidently it is fixable. I just don't know how. Could someone more wikipedia-savvy perhaps figure out how to fix it? Ribidag (talk) 06:51, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extra comma in preview
Talk:Henry Hicks (Nova Scotia politician)

message: I have assessed this as a Stub, as it contains only the basic information on the topic, and of low importance, as I do not feel that many people outside of Canada would be familiar with the subject of the article. Cheers, CP 16:15, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Henry Hicks was driving under the influence when he struck the other family in 1990. Does anyone have a link to that story? Schuylerhsmith (talk) 02:24, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drunk Driving
Talk:Henry Holland, 3rd Duke of Exeter

message: This question is for the contributor Agricolae. First, thanks for expanding the title in the citation of Todd A. Farmerie's article in the previous sentence, which makes the pertinence of the article to this Wikipedia entry much clearer.
Second, you removed my sentence "In a posting to the Internet newsgroup soc.genealogy.medieval dated 14 June 2009 , Farmerie cites definitive evidence that Sir Robert Holland was actually Henry's half-brother." In your explanation for the deletion, you wrote "remove unpublished material - for a biography of Henry it is sufficient to refute the claim that he is the father, without providing the undocumented correct solution."
If you agree that the identification of Sir Robert Holland as Henry's half-brother is in itself sufficiently noteworthy to be mentioned in this context, then it may be mentioned that it appears in a published source, namely Douglas Richardson, Plantagenet Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 3rd ed. (Baltimore, 2004), pp. 299-301. While I have always regarded Richardson's claim as persuasive if not absolutely decisive, it drew objections from some quarters; and the fact that he afterwards stated () that his conclusions were influenced by some of my own work has made me shy away from engaging in a controversy in which I might be viewed as having a vested interest. As it happens, the identification in Farmerie's soc.genealogy.medieval posting of 14 June 2009 vindicates Richardson's 2004 theory, so for the present purposes the criticism of Richardson's work is moot, and there seems to be no reason why it should not be cited. But I will leave the matter to your judgement. Thanks.
John Blythe Dobson (talk) 17:11, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually in Richardson's book, Robert Holland is listed as the illegitimate child of John Holland, the 2nd Duke, not Henry, the 3rd Duke. And that can be seen online Google eBook. A rootsweb forum or any other self-published tree is not reliable and does not have proof to back this claim up. Those kind of sources are frowned upon on Wikipedia. I also fail to see a son being named under Henry Holland, 3rd Duke of Exeter. Where is this claim coming from? According to Richardson and even Anne of York's page states that they had one daughter; no Thomas is listed. This is why there was an issue with property. Therefore I am taking out "Thomas Holland (1461)." -- Lady Meg (talk) 21:16, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship between and Henry Holland, 3rd Duke of Exeter, and Robert Holland, 'Bastard of Exeter' 

message: Please see the discussion on the Duke of Exeter talk page about whether the description of Henry Holland as "3rd Duke of Exeter" is correct. Mike Elston (talk) 15:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title "3rd Duke"?
Talk:Henry Howard, 13th Duke of Norfolk

message: Can anyone explain, where did the "Fitzalan" part come from? From Fitzalan Chapel? And for what? Just to make the surname outstanding? СЛУЖБА (talk) 05:53, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fitzalan. 

message: According to Antonia Fraser's book on Catholic Emancipation which I've just been reading, this fellow - at least I think it's him, the son of Duke Bernard - once allegedly said that poor people should be made to eat curry, and thereafter acquired the nickname "Pepper and Potatoes". I'll leave it to somebody else to add this.
AF likens the nickname to Marie Antoinette supposedly saying "Let Them Eat Cake". Paulturtle (talk) 07:04, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pepper and Potatoes
Talk:Henry Howard, 7th Duke of Norfolk

message: I am removing this uncited sentence (from the end of the introduction paragraph):
He was also known to be one of the only Muslim Duke at the time in England, alongside the Duke of Surrey.
Not only is it ungrammatical and uncited and clearly incorrect for a man who was a staunch Catholic but the only Duke of Surrey in history (Thomas Holland, lived 1374-1400) was not a contemporary.Cloptonson (talk) 21:23, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of suspected vandalism
Talk:Henry Scrymgeour-Wedderburn, 11th Earl of Dundee

message: "Henry Scrymgeour-Wedderburn"?
Has Monty Python been past here?
...!
213.246.88.102 (talk) 02:43, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  I say... 

message: Wot?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.221.205 (talk) 20:44, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  PPS to the President of Eden's board
Talk:Nightmare Cinema (band)

message: First of all, I just made sure to add the Songs template above. Second, the creator of this article just copied and pasted the text from a web page. I had to change most of the content so that it is no longer plagiarism. If there's anything else that I missed, please do your best to fix it. Thank you. --Russoc4 01:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow! Just copy & paste form the web page eh? --Λeternus 19:36, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article
Talk:Derek Keenan

message: I removed the statement "Keenan's wife is the sister of National Hockey League veteran Joe Nieuwendyk." since it was unsourced. It's of questionable encyclopedic value anyway. --MrBoo (talk, contribs) 04:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Craniate

message: Surely this isn't true? -see hagfish Fayefox 20:37, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "all craniates have skulls"

message: In common parlance, "head" designates the business end of various non-craniate animals, such as the cephalic tagma of insects. For clarity, perhaps change either to "all chordates with a head" or "all animals with a cranium"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.8.12.78 (talk) 11:29, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Craniata includes all animals with a head" 

message: "the hagfish is not a true vertebrate and thus cannot be considered a true fish."-Evolutions,Diversity and Ecology,(Vol.3) Author-Brooker.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.171.233.78 (talk) 00:38, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hagfish 

message: Craniates sure don't belong to the cephalochordates, but I don't manage to figure out how to change it. Can someone do this please?
Best wishes,
Rikske V. (talk) 19:10, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cephalochordata 

message: Are you sure hagfish (myxini) aren't vertebrates? My book says: "Hagfish have at times been excluded from the vertebrates because they have only vestiges of a vertebral column. However, recent molecular studies confirm that they are related to the other jawless fish, the lampreys. Reptiles, birds, and mammals (as well as amphibians, of which there are no marine species) are informally grouped together as tetrapods (tetrapoda) within the larger [informal] group of jawed vertebrates (Gnathostomata), which also include fish." (An ocean book I have, emphasis added.) Charizardmewtwo (talk) 14:57, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hagfish 

message: with the following edit , describing Craniata as obsolete rather than proposed. Have you got a reliable source to back this up? I see the following problems with this edit:
#It seems for living animals that Craniata has become a synonym for Vertebrata. But does this make the clade obsolete? It is still a valid clade, but one with a synonym. Using this reasoning you could equally argue that Vertebrata was obsolete because of the presence of Craniata.
#Things become murkier when you consider extinct animals, as groups like the Cephalaspidomorphi are generally agreed to be craniates; but evidence of also being vertebrates is inconclusive. This would suggest the Craniata are not obolete after all.
#Scientific papers still regularly use the term craniata: on Google Scholar, in 2017, 83 papers use the term Craniata, and 47 use the term craniate. So it is in current scientific use. 
Any comments on this? --Jules (Mrjulesd) 20:01, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obsolete? 
Talk:Henry Marchant

message: @User:Randy Kryn: Henry Marchant is considered a Founding Father by whom? Since you didn't add a citation, we have no way of telling. So please apply one so we can discuss what your source is and then what other sources have to say. Allreet (talk) 10:32, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute unsourced Founding Fathers claim
Talk:Edmonton Police Service

message: A current news article states they own / operate a 1980 Cessna airplane and are looking to buy a newer airplane. 2603:6011:C806:BA00:10F4:C0BF:4767:AA09 (talk) 21:50, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  vehicles
Talk:Henry Moor

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 23:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: You need Henry Moore disambiguation page.--Matt Lewis (talk) 03:04, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambiguation page 
Talk:Hyperscan

message: This article must be deleted because we alreadt have another article that has the correct spelling, HyperScan, whereas this article didn't capitalize the S.
-Klaus_Kratchet Oct. 28, 2006
6:32 Western Pacific Time
No, it must not be deleted. However it can be redirected and the content merged.Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 15:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Henry Petty-Fitzmaurice, 4th Marquess of Lansdowne

message: Just because he was now sitting in the Lords as Baron Wycombe, it doesn't follow that he was known by that title. The present Marquess of Salisbury was always known as Viscount Cranborne, despite sitting as Baron Cecil of Essendon. Opera hat (talk) 15:15, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style 1856-63
Talk:Baruch (His Dark Materials)

message: Not so, so sure there's an undertone there, considering they're a heterosexual couple. Methulah 02:15, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Homosexual Undertone?

message: :Angels in Pullman's stories are indeed male and female when they take human form.  Baruch and Balthamos are male lovers, yes.  In fact Baruch was a human male at some point.  I wouldn't call it a homosexual "undertone" seeing as how they are blatantly and obviously a male-male couple (I think of "undertone" as being something obscure that is merely hinted at, not plainly laid out in simple terms, like this same-sex relationship is).Rglong 06:51, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Yes they're gay, get over it
Talk:Guy Montag

message: The order of events leading to him questioning his exstince are right, but are out of order. I will fix them
DK08
10/28/06
22:16
Do they have to be numbered? NightMaj 23:50, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of events 

message: Does the name Montag have any deeper meaning? It happens to be German for "monday". -- wr 87.139.81.19 (talk) 11:53, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of the name 

message: There's currently more info on Montag from the videogame than the book. There's no info on how he was prior to the game. I feel it's necessary to get info from there.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pokelego999 (talk • contribs) 19:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the book?
Talk:Henry Rich, 1st Earl of Holland

message: I recently added a reference to the article. There is a lot of information from that source that could be incorporated into the article. I'm sure there are other useful sources as well. Psychless 03:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements can be made 

message: Because account of his Civil War activities appeared to abruptly start with his participation at the battle of St Neot's, I have tried to account for his earlier times in the wars more fully with detail cited to his History of Parliament biography. However there still appears to be a gap for which further fill in detail would be welcome between his becoming royalist General and his arrival in St Neot's.Cloptonson (talk) 13:01, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Detail on earlier Civil War activities

message: There is so much detail about the Battle of St Neot's that it would lend itself to a creation of a separate article, which would unburden this page of detail extraneous to Holland's biography.Cloptonson (talk) 14:05, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Now rewritten, content moved to separate article. Robinvp11 (talk) 19:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Battle of St Neot's detail
Talk:Phil Sayer

message: By no means geographically restricted to the stations listed in the article - I've heard the same announcements all over the country.  Be nice if someone could clear this up ... was New Street the first to implement it, etc? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.113.10.6 (talk • contribs) 03:20, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Much text in this article is about Elinor, not Phil. Should this not be in a separate article of her own? 87.112.86.2 20:09, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elinor 

message: Phil had four children, not two. Article needs correcting.Fairedited (talk) 00:53, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for bringing this to attention, . I found a source for this and corrected the article. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:03, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual error 

message: I see the link to http://www.sayerhamilton.com/ had been removed for WP:ELNO. I noticed this item under the blog section about "a "guess the voice" feature on ITV's This Morning" which might be used to add to the article:  Martinevans123 (talk) 07:54, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Business link
Talk:Cookie Crisp Double Chocolate

message: Please let it remain. It is informative. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Anirudh hungund (talk • contribs) 02:22, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

message: The name of this cereal is innaccurate, it's actually called Double Chocolate Cookie Crisp, there is no "chip" in the title. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pkibbey (talk • contribs) 02:31, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming the title
Talk:Henry Sacheverell

message: I always thought that Henry Sacheverell died on June 15, 1724, yet other sources claim that he died on June 5, 1724.  Even Find A Grave has June 5 as his death date.  Which death date is correct? --Angeldeb82 (talk) 15:20, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused again 

message: I query the statement he was suspended from ministry for three years from the trial.  When the trial finished, he was installed as Rector of Selattyn near Oswestry in Shropshire on 26 June 1710, the patron of the living being an old Cambridge pupil of his.  He proceeded from the scene of his trial in a sort of triumphal journey to Selattyn, such was public support for him.  He was, yes, appointed to his Holborn benefice in 1713, ceasing to be Rector of Selattyn that year.Cloptonson (talk) 15:12, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Suspension of ministry?

message: Is 'an incendiary 5 November sermon' meant to be humorous? 89.197.114.196 (talk) 16:55, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ha ha
Talk:Monkey Majik

message: Would someone like to update this page with Monkey Majik's new single (Together)? I believe it has done quite well on the Oricon charts...
I am no good at editing articles, so it would be great if someone else could!
121.45.58.23 (talk) 13:25, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sadly, I don't read Japanese so the reference given was of no help to me.  However, I offer the following link in response.  While Maynard may have graduated from Queen's in 1997 as indicated, he could not have moved to Japan until the following year as he served as president of the Queen's University student government from spring 1997 until spring 1998.   It would be somewhat difficult to live in Japan while being in Kingston, Ontario. PoliSciMaster (talk) 15:18, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of Maynard Plant's move to Japan 