Talk:Georgia (country)/Archive 2

message: The section of economy, which is supposed to be about the economy of the modern state, begins: Archaeological research demonstrates that Georgia has been involved in commerce with the majority of the world's historical empires. It is cited, and the citation has a caption National Museum of Georgia. However, if we look closer we find out that the source is a 11.11.2005 advertisement of two books "Colchis Land of Golden Fleece" and "Max Tilke Costumes of the Caucasian People", one for 10 USD another for 17 USD . Although, even here I was unable to find anything like "world's historical empires". Tamokk 05:11, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: tagged

message: The lead section says that Georgia is an "emerging liberal democracy"; however, that is only the opinion of Lincoln Mitchell and Mikheil Saakashvili, not a fact. For example, in its well-known Freedom in the World 2006 report, Freedom House describes Georgia as only "partly free" and thus not a liberal democracy. And according to WP:NPOV, "None of the views should be given undue weight or asserted as being the truth." Moreover, liberal democracy, as used in the lead section, is merely a peacock term intended to glorify its subject without imparting to the reader any useful information. -- WGee 04:31, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely right. Tamokk 05:16, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liberal Democracy 

message: I began working on the article. All literate editors are wellcomed to join me. Tamokk 12:25, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lets all work on it Tamokk and keep politics out of it, Communism or Capitalism. 
I only expresed my negativity for your editing only due to the fact that you deleted some valuable information. However, you are a very good editor so lets all improve the articles and maybe you can help me in translating this one into Basque :) Euskera 13:51, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New begining

message: Culture of Georgia section is empty, we need to add something there, Kober can you help? Euskera 17:52, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Culture

message: I tried to cleanup the article by restructuring it, I don't think it needs the cleanup tag now - even though content can be added. See Turkey or Canada to improve and balance out the article. (a culture section would be nice per above :)) Cheers! Baristarim 15:12, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, excellent work Baristarim, im amazed. Its good to see the professional editor. Article is shaping nicely thanks to you. Can i use you on Basque Wikipedia? LOL :) Please continue editing, this article definitely need your attention. Marci! Euskera 16:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Unfortunately Mr Tamok still damaging this article with POV deletions. You did not consult other users and removed valuable information which was referenced. I can detect a strong POV (political i presume) in your edits. Im sorry but i am alwasy frank. bartsho suna gaiko. Euskera 14:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Which of my edits do you think is POV? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tamokk (talk • contribs) 16:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: and what political POV? As far as I remember I have not express any political POV. Tamokk 16:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Whatever does not suit your intellect, you delete the content which i referenced and nobody except you had any problems with it. You did not ask or vote for removing the sentences among the other users, just started chopping like the Soviet censorship. Stop deleting referenced materials from this article. And discuss first before removing whole sentences. BTW use example of the editor User:Baristarim Euskera 16:47, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: if something is referenced this does not mean that it should have place in the article. and i have already indicated above what do some of the references really represent. I again reverted your edit. in the comment i did not specifically mean you. i just wanted to say that i do no more see any sense in correcting other editors irresponsible edits. the flow seems endless anyway. Tamokk 17:02, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  irresponsible edits? Just because i made one error on early medieval it does not mean i am irresponsible. I spend my time to improve this article. So you are the main responsible editor for corrections and deciding what should be or not on the article? That’s what i meant by POV. Well i tried my best to co-operate and i don’t see any point going on. I thought I was helping but now im irresponsible. Do whatever you want, your hero Stalin did the same in politics. Good luck. Euskera 17:21, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Mr. Euskara, the "early medieval" was not the only fault of your edit. See, once you have written a normal sentences I am not touching. Tamokk 04:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes Comrade :) Thanks :) Euskera 14:18, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup