Talk:Shashlik

message: I'm going to make a few corrections to this article - I think it was written by someone who is not a native English speaker.
Splitting this article is probably a good idea. I think the food related meaning is wastly more common than the scientific one.
62.16.144.149 16:00, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My ketchup bottle says "Schaschlik"...wich I think might be the German way of spelling it. - Chsf 14:02, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The English-language dictionaries I consulted spell this "shashlik" or even "shaslik" (see Merriam-Webster Collegiate Dictionary).  However, in the most common contemporary transliteration schemes, including Wikipedia:Romanization of Russian the vowel "ы" of Russian would be translated as Latin "y" not "i".  As "shashlik" is not a very common term in English (most speakers would refer to this as a "shish kebab" or just "kebab"), I suspect "shashlyk" is more likely to be used by those familiar with the Russian language by rules of transliteration (although I state this likelihood without documentable confirmation), hence I left "shashlyk" as a variant.  jchristopher 03:51, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

text: See the etymology on the Chislic page - it appears the German and Russian words are similar and basically mean the same thing (Chislic is just another derivative). The name was probably passed on orally from its origins as Shish Kebabs in Persia (Iran) and Turkey and later written down using different spellings based on language.  --Daschnarr (talk) 15:13, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

message: I cut the following text from the article: 
 
If the citations are provided then it could be re-written and go back in, but as it stands it seems to violate WP:OR. Yunshui (talk) 09:18, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Russia v USA

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Shashlik. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131012203426/http://sobhtoos.ir/political/88-%D8%AE%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%86%DB%8C-%D9%87%D8%A7/30597-6lik.html to http://sobhtoos.ir/political/88-%D8%AE%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%86%DB%8C-%D9%87%D8%A7/30597-6lik.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:58, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: So you ignore Russian sources, english sites like Washington Times and books ? 
You say these sources have no weighting for you? That you do not even take the time to include certain relevant passages shows that you are  have no really genuine interest in the subject. Its simply not objective. Wikipedia is already losing credibility. 
Even if the article stays that way, ok. This type of wikipedia policy only accelerates this process, less information diversity = less editor = less global information quality = less relevance. Over time, other platforms and sources of information will emerge that make Wikipedia irrelevant. I'm sure they are already in the coming.
--85.212.110.234 (talk) 01:11, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , I understand it's frustrating when your edits are reverted. However, that will happen if you don't follow basic Wikipedia policies. The source you gave can't be used because it is not a reliable source, see WP:SPS. I'm sorry but there's nothing that can be done about that. You also removed material that was verified by multiple very reliable sources, and removed the sources themselves. Finally, you added material without any source, and made it look like it was verified by the existing source when it was not, see WP:HIJACK. If you familiarize yourself with the guidelines, you will find it easier to have your edits accepted. Also, article pages are for discussion of improvements to the article, please don't use them to make personal criticisms of other editors, or general comments, see WP:TALKNO. Thanks. --IamNotU (talk) 17:54, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  @Wikaviani 

message: In the last paragraph use of the "frying" is incorrect. The English word "frying" always means to cook in a pan or on a griddle, and most of the time means cooking in hot oil. It never means cooking over flame or hot coals. 208.115.153.53 (talk) 18:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  frying