Talk:Subterranean rivers of London

message: I found this at http://www.wildtrout.org/WTT/library/features/lostlondon.asp (which is in the External links list):
:(needs rewording to avoid CopyVio) the Hackney Brook which entered the Lea, and the little Brent, running through Ealing, Perivale, Greenford and Brentford.
RHaworth 09:52, 2005 Jan 22 (UTC)
::Reworded for Lea now, plus Hackney Brook article added. Tarquin Binary 11:56, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possibly Add

message: The London Borough of Sutton external link has gone dead so I have removed it from the article and stored its address here in case it comes to life again. this article (RJP 10:12, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sutton web site

message: Does anyone know if there is a verb for "to make a river subterranean?" I'm translating another article and the verb figures quite heavily. Thanks. -Oreo Priest 09:47, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: to culvert? (better late than never) Pterre (talk) 21:49, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just went with cover. The article is covering of the Senne. Thanks. Oreo Priest 17:01, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verb 

message: This page could really benefit from a map.  Anyone know the exact paths of the rinvers and could put one together?
Gavinatkinson (talk) 19:44, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map? 

message: Okay,  there might not be any sources strong enough to completely deny the claims of the Tyburn flowing through the antique shop's basement. However the images posted here and here should be enough to allow for a "supposedly" in front of the statement, since that water looks nothing like what you see on the photo in the article. --Baumi (talk) 16:12, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Tyburn 

message: The link leads to a disambiguation page. Jackiespeel (talk) 18:59, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The Graveney River

message: A good source might be: http://www.londonslostrivers.com/ 80.150.212.245 (talk) 08:58, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source: London's Lost Rivers 

message: I could be wrong but surely the Rom is in the East - certainly not West of Brent  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phileadie (talk • contribs) 11:55, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  River Rom - East to West 

message: I removed "passing mentions" in fiction re WP:IPC. None of the books were about subterranean rivers. The River Wandle flows above ground. This strong source states that there is no evidence the Langbourne ever existed. The river on the North bank of the Thames do not all flow East to West, as stated. Span (talk) 14:10, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edits

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Subterranean rivers of London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131026162809/http://www.timesonline.co.uk:80/tol/news/politics/article4138268.ece to http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article4138268.ece
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:46, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There are passing mentions of this with reference to Crossrail -  and  probably suffice as references. A mention here or on the River Fleet page? Jackiespeel (talk) 17:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faggeswell Brook 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Subterranean rivers of London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090626222801/http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/news/100997.aspx?month=1&year=2009&coverage=National§or=Agriculture%2CClimatechange%2CConstruction%2CConsultations%2CDrought%2CEnergy%2CFishingandaquaculture%2CFlood%2CPollution%2CRegulation%2CReports%2CWaste%2CWater%2CWildlifeandconservation&persona=Business%2CEvent%2CHome%2CProsecution%2CScience to http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/news/100997.aspx?month=1&year=2009&coverage=National§or=Agriculture%2cClimatechange%2cConstruction%2cConsultations%2cDrought%2cEnergy%2cFishingandaquaculture%2cFlood%2cPollution%2cRegulation%2cReports%2cWaste%2cWater%2cWildlifeandconservation&persona=Business%2cEvent%2cHome%2cProsecution%2cScience
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090815172653/http://www.therrc.co.uk/lrap.php to http://www.therrc.co.uk/lrap.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I'm having trouble finding a difference between the Muswell Stream (it has a redlink in the article) and the River Moselle (which is bluelinked) in online sources. Most of them seem to fudge the difference, even if they acknowledge it to start with. The source provided for both Muswell Stream and River Moselle only mentions the former; the context seems to reference the latter.
Are these two waterways, or are they, as I suspect, just the one with two different names? ◦ Trey Maturin 18:23, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muswell Stream vs River Moselle 

message: I have added back in a section for the Langbourne. The original of this section was removed in 2012 by one editor without discussion. I have expanded and rewritten the original text of the section and added additional references for why this stream probably existed. It should probably be expanded to a full article. Agrestis (talk) 06:24, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Langbourne