lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Free festival

message: The article at present claims that the Windsor Free Festival was the "...first intentionally free festival...".
The page also mentions the Glastonbury Free Festival 1971 - which is clearly earlier. (Phun City 1970 is also mentioned, but the article for that explains that it was not originally intended to be free.)
The term Free Festival I think also needs to be more precisely defined before one can claim that there is any such thing as the first of its kind. For example how large does it have to be before being counted? FrankSier (talk) 17:59, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "...first intentionally free festival..."?
Talk:Card Player

message: I changed the redirect because Card Player (magazine) has, for the past 15 years, been the major magazine of poker. It should definitely not be a redirect to card game. It was not at all obvious for me to find out that there even was a Card Player (magazine) article, until I searched for CardPlayer (no space). I think that the majority of people searching for "Card Player" will be searching for the magazine. There are many other terms that one would search for first if you wanted to reach card game, and if you wanted the article on a generic player, you'd search gambler or poker player first. --Storkk 22:23, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: redirect of [[Card Player]] explanation

message: PS. I'll be fixing the double redirects as soon as I am sure I won't get reverted. --Storkk 22:29, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: double redirects

message: Hi, can you put the link to www.cardplayeritalia.com (about cardplayeritalia magazine)
thanks, Massimiliano Lupi, Direttore Responsabile CardplayerItalia  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.18.66.22 (talk) 00:03, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's in Italian, so that would only be linked from an Italian Wikipedia article when/if one is ever made. 2005 (talk) 00:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  link www.cardplayeritalia.com
Talk:La Década Perdida

message: This page needs to be cleaned up (grammar, spelling, wording...) after being translated, too early for me to do so! thanks!
makeyourself 09:23, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled 1

message: "The Mexican peso would then be devaluated by a 500%." Does this mean that its value would be negative? Maybe the author meant 5/6 (= -83,3%)? 85.180.127.88 (talk) 13:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled 2

message: I am adding to the translation from the Spanish article. To start I am going to translate the introduction and the sections labled general and the second lost decade. I am trying to make the translated version of this article more faithful to the original Spanish version. I found one source in Spanish to help add validity to some of the datapoints but there is still citations needed for this translation. Anything that could be added would be appreciated. 
Gpiazza123 (talk) 02:29, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation from original Spanish article
Talk:Reversible addition−fragmentation chain-transfer polymerization

message: Figure 3 still uses methacrylic acid as the monomer and then makes polyacrylic acid as the product. One of the two needs to be fixed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:B350:B270:353C:E4C8:7564:EBA9 (talk) 00:00, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Fix request

message: I've noticed a week or so ago that this page contained false and misleading information and has typographical errors. I intend to invest some time working on this page. In particular the section on the Mechanism contains false information and the Applications section seems confusing to me. Suggestions on my edits, as they appear are welcome. AussieScientist (talk) 20:52, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Page cleanup

message: There is a picture labeled "figure 2" with this caption:
Figure 2. Two examples of RAFT agents.
The picture shows chemical structure and two chemicals in bottles. What are these chemicals? Can the names be provided, or are they strange chemicals with no common name?  Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:34, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Figure 2

message: Subtopic, not notable enough for standalone article. Enterprisey (talk!) 07:12, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 11:32, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Enz-RAFT]]
Talk:Disability Discrimination Act 1995

message: Why exactly is Disability discrimination legislation so sringent in Britain compared to many other countries of the world? for example, new transit vehicles are rquired to have colour contrasted doors, why is still not required in most countries.Myrtone
Interesting question:  UK disability legislation is often said to be among the most comprehensive in the World - but certain US states have had legislation for longer, and Canada (Ontario in particular) is also a real trailblazer.  I do not know whether these jurisdictions have equivalents to Part 5 DDA (which gives the Secretary of State powers to make accessibility regulations for trains, buses and taxis) - but if they don't, it may not just reflect the relative strengths of the disability movement in different countries, but also the relative importance of public transport in different places.  Sjoh0050 15:42, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Two drivers apply, the Health and Safety Act, from the 1970s onwards, and an EEC Directive, which you'll have to look up. Essentially, disability extends to people with reduced, but still marginal, visibility, and experience establised that colour contrast was very helpful to them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.213.9.109 (talk) 02:15, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

text: From a wider angle, it was realised that although particular classes of individual had gained various protections individually, a common set of factors, either natal or life-induced, reduced the normal capacity of a significant proportion of the population, and so a wider net has been provided to level the playing field. Hidden disabilities are now part of the agenda too. Essentially, the debate is fiscal, between Socialist causes and Capitalist politics.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.213.9.109 (talk) 02:22, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't the entries on the 1992 and 1995 DDAs be brought together with an inclusion of details of the 2005 act?
No.  The 1992 Act is an Australian Act.  The 2005 Act is an amending Act, so it is correct to talk about the 1995 Act, as amended by later legislation (which the entry explains.  Sjoh0050 20:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  DDA 1992, 1995, 2005
Talk:The Terminator: Future Shock

message: There's alot of confusion on the release date between different sites, but I found a few consistent dates between Gamespy, Gamestats and the like saying it was on May 24, 1996, which seems about right to my memory... I'll send an e-mail to Todd, and see what he says. LordJumper 13:51, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date sources 

message: I think that one of the most notable facts about this game, is that Todd Howard was the producer and designer of it. To quote the article about him (why it is notable): "Todd Howard is an American video game designer, director and producer. He currently serves as Game Director and Executive Producer at Bethesda Game Studios, where he has led the creation of Fallout 3 and The Elder Scrolls video game series. GamePro magazine named him to the Top 20 Most Influential People in Gaming over the last 20 years.[1] He has also been named one of IGN’s Top Game Creators of All Time.[2]". 85.224.184.20 (talk) 20:03, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I obviously mean that I think it should be noted. 85.224.184.20 (talk) 20:05, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Fact Missing
Talk:Doctor (disambiguation)

message: We had a debate on a talk page of mine, whether the term Physician comprises other practicing medical professions (i.e. surgeons) or not. We haven't come to a definitive result, as there seems to be an US/UK difference and I am from neither. If some US English speaker could comment on this..
:User_talk:DabMachine#All_Physicians_are_doctors_but_not_all_doctors_are_Physicians
Maybe this could also help to clarify this disambiguation page. -- Ravn 09:42, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure I understand the problem as this is "Doctor (disambiguation)" not "Physician (disambiguation). My understanding though, is that surgeons are a subclass of physician. Some medical specialists (biochemists for example) would generally not be considered physicians, though they would be considered doctors. Dv82matt 04:38, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyway, this should be at "Doctor," not "Doctor (disambiguation)." 210.189.164.104 06:27, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguating Doctor / Physician / etc.
Category talk:Security identifier types

message: A disabiguation point in regard to the name of this category. 
In government parlance the word security is often misused, but always implies something on the lines of keeping the bad guys from doing dangerous things to people we're (theoretically) responsible for. The Department of Homeland Security in the US uses the word in this sense. 
In computer and network use, the word security is used in the same sense, though of course not with respect to people with actual bombs, or runaway vehicles finally ending their misbegotten lives against trees and buildings and abutments, and suchlikr uses. Though metaphorical ones of all classes are frequent. The book Security Engineering by Ross Anderson (Professor at Cambridge) captures this use well as do the endless series of less well written books on Computer Security or Network Security (some for Dummies and some not). In discussions about cryptography, the term is used always in the following sense, "The security of this encryption algorithm depends on determining whether the shaken-not-stirred problem belongs in P or NP. If the former, its security is a bit dicey as someone might come up with a fast algorithm for the problem and make attacks practical. If the latter, we probably good to go for a very long time."
None of these meanings have anything to do with stocks, bonds, or any other tradeable (or non-tradeable) financial instruments. Those are securities. As in "My secutities trader has turned out to be a mini-Enron, and I'm going to lose my shirt! Do these windows open?"
As one from the computer side of this multi=way divide, may I ask that the name of this category be changed to "...Securities..."? Thank you. ww 09:43, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The meaning being used in the category title is explained at the wikipedia article: Security (finance).  As we use it in the singular form for that article, I don't see a problem with keeping this category as is.  If you are convinced that the singular form is wrong, maybe try taking it up on Talk:Security (finance).  If they change the name of that article, I would see no problem in changing the category name to follow suit. --DDG 15:42, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Marie C. Brehm

message: Was Marie C. Brehem really the first legally qualified female vice presidential candidate, or wasn't that Marietta Stow? Шизомби 09:54, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: When I started this entry on Marie C. Brehm on 28-10-05, I used Temperance Movement Groups and Leaders of the U.S. as the source.David Justin 02:40, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: David Justin / Dr. David J. Hanson, You have been persistently been spam linking to your sites mainly using sock puppets such as those blocked in this case: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/David Justin (2nd).
You claim that the page you created on 28-10-05 is based on http://www2SPAM.potsdam.edu/hansondj/Controversies/1124913901.html 
However, if we examine the page using the Waybackmachine http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www2.potsdam.edu/hansondj/Controversies/1124913901.html , we find that at February 14 2006, http://web.archive.org/web/20060214182339/http://www2.potsdam.edu/hansondj/Controversies/1124913901.html this page does not mention Marie C. Brehm at all.
You appear to have copied the text from Wikipedia more or less verbatim into your own page some time during February 2007 and you are now claiming that your page is the original source!
Did you really think your sleight of hand wouldn’t be found out? It is hardly likely to enhance your reputation as an academic. Wham Bam No Thank You Spam 08:35, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Claim of being the source

message: Hi Wham- With only the date changed, the observation of respected editor John Broughton says it well:
:May I point out that the text that was "copied" into the potsdam.edu page was created by User:David Justin on September 10, 2005, and that contributors to Wikipedia retain the copyright over their own contributions.  You're not really accusing Dr. Hanson of plagarizing himself, are you?  -- John Broughton   (♫♫) 14:59, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The source

message: Hi Wham- Please note that  the source for this Wikipedia entry is “Temperance Movement Groups and Leaders in the U.S.,” from which the material in bold was taken. Thanks.David Justin 01:36, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Source documentation
Talk:Dow theory

message: Article talks about 3 trends - uptrend,downtrend and recurring trend. Here are three trends which are primary, secondary and daily fluctuations. Looks like correction is due. --Tigga en 19:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed that too.  I also noticed that there is no mention of lines (trading ranges).  In the book Technical Analysis Explained by Pring, "Lines indicate movement" is one of the tenets.  Would anyone mind if I did some editing? PushMePullMe (talk) 22:34, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 1st tenet

message: Does the Goetzmann & Brown paper  meet the standards for inclusion in the article ? The authors include the following comment: "Very Preliminary! Comments Welcome. Please do not Quote."  I believe reference to the paper should be suppressed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.184.84.10 (talk) 12:11, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference
Talk:Lion taming

message: inky 09:58, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Zoos?

message: This article has lots of potential for expansion. How about the profession of lion tamer? Famous lion tamers? Species of lions that are used? A discussion of lion tamer casualties might be in order, too. Also, I heard somewhere that the shows are usually unisex (lions only, lionesses only) and that being in the cage with both lions and lionesses at the same time is more dangerous. --85.160.11.130 06:59, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: The following moved from article's list of lion tamers - belongs in yet-to-be-created "In popular culture" section (which might not be such a bad idea):
* (in fiction) "Ronder, of course, was a household word. He was the rival of Wombwell": Sherlock Holmes: The Adventure of the Veiled Lodger
~E:74.60.29.141 (talk) 20:51, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture 

message: I modified a statement to reflect source material.  The cited source does not mention anything about "accusations of cruelty in recent years". The only mention of "cruelty" is: "...the cruel use of animals in circuses was the very issue that prompted our founder, Irene Heaton, to establish CAPS back in 1957." ~Eric F:74.60.29.141 (talk) 01:55, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source material 
Talk:Isle of Wight Steam Railway

message: Today I removed this;
In addition to the lines described a branch line once connected the village of Bembridge with Brading, the latter a stop on the Ryde to Ventnor line. This track followed the River Yar as far as the village of St Helens. From here it went along the harbour causeway to its final stop in Bembridge. Turntables at Bembridge and St Helens reversed the direction of the small tank engine.
It does not seem to be relevent to the article, and anyway the information provided is more or less all there in the diagram anyway. However it might find a home elsewhere. Naturenet | Talk 10:08, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The majority of it is now at the Isle of Wight Railway article, which still needs work. --Peeky44 (talk) 23:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed text 
Talk:Test suite

message: Only one example is given, which is a bit biased. There were two more examples, but they have been removed on July 18, 2011
* The ACE supertest suite, an industry leading C/C++ compiler test suite.	
* Modena Software, a leading compiler validation testing company which provides test suites for C++ and Java compiler.
This was not spam IMHO.
Vasywriter (talk) 06:58, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: They appear to have violated WP:SPAMLINK: "Adding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam." We're not here to sell products but to be an encyclopedia. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

text: Books are not products in the same way so you may want to read WP:EL to clarify external lists. As for the list, you should discuss that there, not here, but you may want to read WP:LIST before you do since so far, all you've been doing is inserting your opinion and not applying policy or guidelines. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:14, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

text: I'm sorry for the confusion. I misread the link as Prentice-Hall. The remaining link is also a SPAMLINK. Removing. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:38, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links - Examples of test suites
Talk:Sannin shogi

message: Does anyone have any boards of this, or set up in play?
In addition, the article talks about the limitations of HTML to prevent them from displaying the pieces properly, but the Hexagonal Chess article uses illustrations that correctly show hex pieces. The look & feel of this artcile could greatly be improved upon if the person/s who created those illu. could create them for this article as well.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.201.148.152 (talk) 04:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Finally got around to it. It does make a difference! kwami (talk) 07:38, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  board photos?
Talk:Calvin Kingsley

message: The sentence "In 1844 Kingsley successfully debated someone of the Universalist faith, an overwhelming triumph deserving of the thanks of all denominations." does not conform to wikipedia's principle of Neutral point of view.  (Universalists could be expected to strongly disagree with the sentiment!).
I have therefore removed everything after the word "faith", so that the sentence now reads "In 1844 Kingsley successfully debated someone of the Universalist faith".
BrownHairedGirl 10:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Five Little Speckled Frogs

message: This article has been kept due to lack of consensus at this AFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:34, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: AFD

message: Why and where does this article need additional citations for verification? What references does it need and how should they be added? Hyacinth (talk) 01:24, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Citations are needed for verification, throughout the article. Reliable sources discussing the song should be cited. - SummerPhD (talk) 03:15, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations

message: the melody of this song is so familiar, but i cant quite place it .... it's possible that at some point when i was younger, i heard a nursery rhyme that was a derivative of this, and assumed it was the original, having never heard the version with frogs.  but I can't track that down either.  mostly putting this here as a reminder to myself so i can remember what it is. —Soap— 18:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Melody 

message: "A little girl on a public bus in Cambridge"? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 00:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bus source 

message: There are three names related to this song, namely, Lucille Wood, Louise Binder Scott and Virginia Pavelko from various web pages.  Its original title might be "Ten Little Frogs" and then adapted as "Five Little Frogs" and in later versions it is re-titled to "Five Little Speckled Frogs".  It is probably not a traditional song at all but one written in 1950s. Please verify this article again. — HenryLi (Talk) 16:36, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is not accurate and the source is unreliable.
Talk:Bombay Company

message: This seems to be an ad or plug. --Splitpeasoup 10:50, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Husband

message: Since this is no longer my "personal" article and there were a number of other editors, I rephrased the paragraphs, and added more sources. Still, there are other things to do:
*Buddhism
*Islam (history vs. contemporary customs and traditions)
*What the "other regions" section should become
--FlammingoHey 15:22, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further goals 

message: This article states that sex outside marriage is frowned upon in Islam, but Ma malakat aymanukum and sex says the contrary.
:200.175.81.104 (talk) 01:10, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ma malakat aymanukum and sex 

message: Please stop Insulting gay partners by using the term husband for their type of relationship. Husband is only used for straight couples. Gay couples prefer to be called each others Life Partner as it is more fair and equal than the dominating sounding term husband. Please stop undoing edits that correct this.75.174.112.26 (talk) 19:05, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:   Husband is an Insulting term for gay couples. Please stop using it. 
Talk:Inuit Circumpolar Council

message: A map depicting member entities would be helpful. Like the one below. //Big Adamsky 11:10, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Kmusser 19:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Map?

message: I have finally gone public with my new article:
* Reindeer hunting in Greenland
-- Fyslee/talk 08:11, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New article: Reindeer hunting in Greenland 

message: Reading this article it seems like the only thing this council has done is discourage the use of the term Eskimo. I'm sure there must be other things that they do but it isn't evident here. --71.75.123.187 (talk) 01:41, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What do they do?