lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Members of the Privy Council of the United Kingdom

message: How about, for naming Prince Philip and Prince Charles, given that they're rather especial cases, a preceeding space-character to cause them to appear on their own at the start of the list?
James F. (talk) 17:20, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I hadn't thought of that, but I like it. Proteus (Talk) 17:25, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: 2004 

message: What's the policy for this cat when a member dies (i.e. is it a cat of current members, or of those who have ever been members)?  I was thinking particularly about Robin Cook, but there are bound to be more. -- Finlay McWalter |  Talk 10:11, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
:It was supposed to be only for living members. Others can be identified by "The Right Honourable" before their names (or "PC" after their names if they're peers). Proteus (Talk) 10:44, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing the dead

message: I have recently renamed this category, closing the debate at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 June 28 to which three Wikipedians contributed a definite "yes".  In the light of another Wikipedian's understandable consternation that we have people in this category who, it seems, were never members of the Privy Council of the United Kingdom, and of the above comments (that the category was created for current Privy Councillors only), perhaps some recasting is necessary.  My two-penn'orth: what about a category "Privy Councils", and sub-categories for current Privy Councillors together with a sub-category for each historical Privy Council?  I don't really know enough about it to suggest more.  --RobertG ♬ talk 14:50, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category renaming controversy 

message: Afterwards we can divide it into current and past if folks so wish. - Kittybrewster 00:33, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: No such thing as PC of the UK

message: I suggest we divide these folk into :Category:Current members of HM Most Honourable Privy Council and :Category:Previous members of HM Most Honourable Privy Council. - Kittybrewster 17:00, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Divide category
Talk:Harvest

message: Removed this:
:In Western Canada, the annual wheat harvest starts in late August or early September and farmers must balance readiness of the wheat versus the time before the first hard frost in the fall.
:In the era before mechanization the difficulty of providing for the increased volume of labour needed for the harvest was an perennial concern. In many agricultural areas school holidays were set to allow the children to work on their parents' farms.  In Canada, immigration was timed to have most new arrivals land in the fall. Most dramatic were the harvest excursions, which saw thousands of labourers voyage to Western Canada each year. The development of the combine harvester that could bring in many crops mechanically solved many of these problems. Even today, harvesting of some labour-intensive crops, like fruits, sees significant labour shortages. It is not uncommon for the farms of southern Ontario to import labour from Mexico and other parts of Latin America.
Can be reincorporated in an expanded version of this article. Tsavage 05:24, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Oppose. Harvest here is a noun, not a verb, and the second sentence of the article already used it in this sense. I've fixed the first sentence to make it consistent. Andrewa (talk) 14:50, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Any additional comments:
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
I have a suggestion to make a section containing the importance of harvest in pre-industrialized societies. Think of the ritualistic human sacrifice most cultures had at some point and the fact that most people would work on the land during harvest  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.94.55.29 (talk) 13:03, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: What is harvesting 157.48.199.92 (talk) 14:19, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biology
Talk:MAC address

message: Why do the ranges specified only have five octet addresss e.g. X2-XX-XX-XX-XX? 2A00:23C4:DB3D:E901:90CA:4ED5:72C:E339 (talk) 12:19, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently a typo – fixed. --Zac67 (talk) 13:53, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ranges of group and locally administered addresses
Talk:Debbie Meyer

message: What is source for 20 World Records and retiring in 1972?  --Tbonefin 14:23, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Familiar (disambiguation)

message: Does Canis lupus familiaris count as a use? Booger-mike (talk) 19:24, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't seem like it. Does anyone refer to this species as just "familiar"? -- Fyrael (talk) 21:17, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dogs
Talk:List of Basque Presidents

message: The word lehendakari (literally, "firstlier") was a neologism. Before the establishment of Standard Basque in the 1970s, it was spelled lendakari.
:Changing the spelling of a word does not make it a neologism. I changed this sentence. --zeno 18:23, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, lendakari was a neologism. -- Error 00:28, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried to make it all clearer by giving both versions of the charge. "Euzko" and "lendakari" were words made up by PNVists. What about "jaurlaritza"?--Erri4a 00:49, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure about jarurlaritza but those neologisms made up by Sabino Arana or some enthusiastic followers are called "aranisms", some of them are strongly estabilished and have been accepted by Euskaltzaindia under the principle that speakers make the language, many others have been rejected and replaced even by Spanish loanwords in some cases. In general "aranism" is a despective term nowadays. --Sugaar 19:34, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neologism
Talk:Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor

message: This article passes over much of the information about COX-2 inhibitors quickly, then spends the bulk of its wordage on *potential* uses + controversy/fraud/etc and I find this odd. It ought to look more like the wikipedia entry for NSAID with a more thorough introductory description, examples, uses, mechanism of action, adverse effects, contraindications. I don't have the time or energy to do this hence I'm just adding my 2 cents to the talk page.Niccast (talk) 23:31, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs better balance 

message: The last two paragraphs reference apoptosis, a well known biological function of programmed cell death. But the wording is a little too dramatic, in my opinion:
"Coxibs such as Celebrex (celecoxib), by selectively inhibiting the overexpressed COX-2, allow p53 to work properly.  Functional p53 allows DNA damaged neuroblastoma cells to commit suicide through apoptosis, halting tumor growth."
Also, this really ought to link to apoptosis, rather than suicide. ThreeRocks (talk) 03:05, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apoptosis
Talk:Peccary

message: If anyone more skilled than I can wrap the text around the side of my javelina picture, while still leaving the caption below it, I would be grateful.Hayford Peirce 18:58, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format ''et al.'' 

message: The writing in this article would be less awkward if the page name were the family name Tayassuidae rather than the awkward plural "peccaries".  69.3.72.249 (talk) 19:49, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The general rule is to use to the most common name of something as the article title, where possible. In this case, "peccary" is the common name, so that's the one used. I'm not sure what you mean about the plural being awkward, since the page name isn't the plural, anyway. Anaxial (talk) 20:04, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, this article is about the family Tayassuidae.  The common name of the family, if not Tayassuidae, is peccary family.  Reading this article, for the first paragraph or so I thought it was about one species, not the family. 69.3.72.249 (talk) 22:44, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If there were a species called simply "peccary", I think you'd be right. But, since there isn't, we follow the same rule as at bear, deer, gibbon, dormouse and so on. Anaxial (talk) 19:45, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name 

message: The three pictures showing the different peccary species at the bottom of the Species section are mislabeled.  The picture labeled Collared Peccary is clearly not of a collared peccary.  While the picture labeled Chacoan Peccary does look like the Collared, there is enough difference for me to not be sure.  I would re-label the pictures otherwise.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by NMOutdoorsman (talk • contribs) 16:00, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: I have read several articles over the years that state that javelinas are not pigs at all but are "New World" animals that are more antelope than pig.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flyzone100 (talk • contribs) 20:14, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin 

message: In South America pig are spreading in the wild forest and there can be chance that there can be hybrid of peccary and pig.The demographic dynamics of the interaction between feral pig populations and those of two native species of peccaries (collared peccary and white-lipped peccary). Airstrike117 (talk) 19:45, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hybridisation between peccary and pig
Talk:Lefty Grove

message: In his two latest books Bill James reluctantly concedes that Walter Johnson was probably greater than Lefty after all, but only because of the length of his career....Hayford Peirce 19:18, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵💸 12:42, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: No mention here of the Lefty Grove Award, as mentioned here. Spicemix (talk) 00:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The mention on the Ed Cheff page should be to the Lefty Gomez Award, per . I'll update that page and provide the source, as the source now provided at Cheff's page does not mention the award at all. I'm not familiar with any "Lefty Grove Award," and certainly not from ABCA. Tyrol5 ▸ [talk] 01:42, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lefty Grove Award
Talk:Taiwan and weapons of mass destruction

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support per consistency with parent article Taiwan. Consider multi-moves for such matters in the future. --BDD (talk) 21:58, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: This is starting to look like a repeat of what happened in the last few days at Hsiung Feng III, with disruptive editing by the same IP-based editor. That page is now Page Protected. There is no point in leaving messages on his/her talk page, because the IP address keeps changing. merlinVtwelve (talk) 23:39, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes and other articles like Brahmos,Brain size faced similar disruption today. Some of these pages were later SEMI Protected on my request. This page is not protected yet and thus continues to be disrupted. I have requested Page protection but an administrator has yet to respond on that. I think we can refrain from an edit war until then since this is currently going nowhere. Thanks. Adamgerber80 (talk) 00:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

text: Also, the IP user has clearly violated 3RR by reverting 3 times within a period of the same day. I am unclear how this rule applies to an IP editor but we should make note of this fact. Thanks Adamgerber80 (talk) 00:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Noted, I've been hoping to steer clear of it myself, but it's easy to lose track. merlinVtwelve (talk) 00:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disruptive editing by IP-hopping editor
Talk:Party of the European Left

message: This is not a far left party. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, left-wing parties in Europe were much less likely to support revolutionary socialism. Traditionally, far left means revolutionary socialism. Rather, this party is close to the "liberal" Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) in the United States. In fact, the United Left, which is closely related to this party, has been compared to the CPC by observers. Mureungdowon (talk) 04:30, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Far-left?
Talk:Hugh Hoyles

message: I noticed that there was an article at Hugh W. Hoyles that was more developed than this one. But there are more links to this article and the article itself does not refer to the "W." in his name. For the most part, I replaced the content of this article with the other. However, I used the color image that was here rather than the B&W--I thought it looked a little better, but I don't really care one way or the other, in case anyone else does. One discrepency that I can't resolve: the article that was here gave the year of birth as 1814, while this one gives it as 1815. older≠wiser 20:17, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ithaca (island)

message: i am pretty sure i did it right but if not please tell me
Caucasianhamburger (talk) 14:58, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  oh yeah baby check that updated census data
Talk:Homestead strike

message: As of the date and time I'm typing this, a search on the article for the word "Schwab" finds ONE occurrence. And it's not "Mr. Schwab", nor "Charles Schwab", nor any other FULL NAME. It's just "Schwab". SINCE WHEN is that the editorial style of Wikipedia? Typically it would be "Charles M. Schwab" on first mention. But you don't even give an explanation of who he is or his connect to events in this article.2600:1700:6759:B000:7067:91E5:88C0:C993 (talk) 01:45, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Schwab?
Talk:Binoculars

message: A section on the history and development of the device is needed. Toyokuni3 (talk) 02:04, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  History  

message: It would be good to have section on image-stabilized binoculars, mentioning their mechanics, cost and the typical amount of increased magnification they make feasible for hand held use. The existing Image stabilization article is not very helpful, being concerned mainly with still and video cameras. CharlesHBennettW (talk) 10:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image stabilization
Talk:Asdf

message: This article is so good in its current state that it really shouldn't be NPOVed ;) -- Fredrik | talk 20:57, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)

message: www.asdf.com!!!!! EVERYONE VISIT ASDF.COM TO GET THE TRUE MEANING OF ASDF!!!! EVERYONE VISIT IT NOW OR ELSE!
~WWW.ASDF.COM STAFF~
removed.
jerks can promote themselves elswhere
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.68.125.220 (talk • contribs) 20:22, 18 May 2006  (UTC2)
: www.asdf.com has been added again to the external links. I am going to remove it again. — Tobias Bergemann 08:26, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe not.  I've visited that site before (I think by randomly typing in asdf). This could just be knee-jerk reaction to the staff adding it. Superm401 - Talk 02:15, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ASDF.C*M Spam  

message: "'asdf' is worth 8 points in Scrabble."
Pfft.  'asdf' is not in the Scrabble dictionary as of 4th edition (TWL06, USA dictionary).  Plus, something so trivial shouldn't even be added.  At all.  I deleted it. 68.231.62.45 18:31, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scrabble ref? 

message: I'm just curios as to why MBM5 redirects here
Was looking for an article on Motherboard Monitor 5
"Asdf
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from MBM5)"
--FuriousV 17:43, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why redirected from MBM5? 

message: "SOMETIMES WHEN YOU POOP IN A BLENDER AND MIX IT WITH ICE CREAM IT SMELLS LIKE BLACK PEOPLE SWEATING ON A HOT SUMMER DAY....BALLS."
Is this supposed to be there? Or is it vandalism. I would be happy to delete it, but I am not sure if it is vandalism. Orthodoxy 17:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you really need to ask? I mean, assuming good faith is one thing but I think this is pretty obviously vandalism. In the future be bold - if you're mistaken it can always be corrected. --Darksun 10:04, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Normally you can safely assume that an addition to an article is vandalism when it is in capital letters, mentions poop, and/or includes the word "balls". Like Darksun said, be bold. People can always undo your reversions if you turn out to be wrong (and in some cases, even if you are right). --LuigiManiac 13:19, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Did we ever find out if this was vandalism or not? jp×g 00:21, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  ?
Talk:Maryland County

message: The flag in the infobox is that of Maryland, USA, I suggest removing it or replacing it with the true Maryland, Liberia flag  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barfyman (talk • contribs) 16:26, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know when it was fixed, but the issue is resolved as of now, so no more worries. EytanMelech (talk) 02:02, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Maryland flag 

message: vivi information 41.57.95.60 (talk) 10:47, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prehistoric
Talk:Samuel Smiles

message: In the Biographical works section, there is the following listing:
Lives of the Engineers, Vol 2, Harbours, Lighthouses and Bridges - John Smeaton and John Rennie 
Question is, which John Rennie? The link points to a disambig page, and I can't tell which one to link to: John Rennie (engineer), who designed London Bridge, or his son, John Rennie (railway engineer), who built London Bridge?
Or is it both?
Kevyn 21:10, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Its John Rennie (1761-1821), designer of the London Bridge. There was also George Rennie (1791-1866) son of John amd brother of Sir John Rennie (1794-1874), builder of the London Bridge Apwoolrich 06:45, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks!  Kevyn 21:11, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Which John Rennie?

message: Wikipedia has a category for "Self help writers" and also a category "British self help writers" - do people consider it appropriate for this to be placed in one of those two categories? ACEOREVIVED (talk) 23:20, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Self help writers category
Talk:List of football clubs in India

message: I removed speedy deletion tag because of this ZeroFuzion 21:28, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: in which case the page should be created in the same style as those, as List of football clubs in India rather than just 'clubs' ... --VampWillow 22:28, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have updated the tables in this page as per the current leagues the clubs play in. Please rectify if there are any mistakes. - Milesandkilometrestogo (talk) 17:12, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's good for now. In fact you are doing really well. Well done. I am actually going to wait till June (when the leagues officially end) before I begin to go deep into this. Some clubs are missing and also I am not a fan of red-links. If the club is not notable then the name should not be highlighted. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 18:00, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok. Thank you. -Milesandkilometrestogo (talk) 18:44, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  League Updates 

message: This article really needs to be updated Adityadebnath 1234567890 (talk) 14:04, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:Selective surface

message: the ways of rays through materials depend on the reflectivity of the matters interface , again depending on the refractive indexes of the involved phases . polished metal normally reflects infrared rays , thats why thermobottle has mirror to keep the warmth . to avoid reflection a inhomogenity in the phase transition must be intruduced by varying the refractive index . this was done already in anti-reflection coating or by gradient index optics . --Konfressor (talk) 09:34, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  reflectivity aspect
Talk:Stephen Moore (actor)

message: Whoops, when I split this article, I should have moved the article "Stephen Moore" to "Stephen Moore (actor)" in order to preserve the history. In my haste, I copy/pasted, and then made the "Stephen Moore" article into the disambig page. So the people who contributed to this article are in the Stephen Moore disambig article, and not here. My bad, sorry about that. Won't happen again.  - Eisnel 22:42, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Khmelnytsky (disambiguation)

message: What is Erroneous?
I am not clear as to the meaning of the disambig statement:
"Pereyaslav Khmelnytskyi, a city in Ukraine (erroneously)"
What is erroneous? The name, or that it is in Ukraine? Please clarify.
Kevyn 22:46, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:USS Alaska (CB-1)

message: After discussions, the advice is to use naval ensigns, not jacks - see Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships/Tables. The correct US flag has been selected by a template - see the US entry in Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships/Ensigns. Folks at 137 19:06, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Which flag?

message: "The thin cloud layer having rendered radar largely useless" - radar is not blocked by cloud, so I doubt if this statement can be true. Tim Vickers (talk) 20:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clouds that block radar?

message: I've been guilty of this myself, but I've committed not to do it anymore, and that is using the Allied nicknames for Japanese Pacific War aircraft, such as "Betty" for Mitsubishi G4M, "Baka" for the Ohka, and "Judy" for the Yokosuka D4Y.  Instead, I suggest using the Japanese names or nicknames, such as "D4Y" or "G4M".  These are more neutral terms for the aircraft, since it uses their real names, not the Allied names for them. Cla68 (talk) 06:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of Allied nicknames for Japanese aircraft

message: The article mentions Alaska's main battery being directed by "Mk 34 directors": A pair of Mk 34 gun directors aided gun laying for the main battery. This cites Friedman's US Cruisers, but the original source is in error as Alaska and Guam were equipped with Mark 38 directors. This should be updated -- Friedman's later publication Naval Firepower mentions the Mark 38 Mods 8 and 9 for the Alaska, Guam, and Hawaii (with Mod 12 spare for an Alaska). I only have this as an e-book, but the mention is on pg 418 location 5450 on Kindle. Cheers Ian.b.roberts (talk) 21:09, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the correction! I've made the change. Please consider sticking around and fact-checking other articles! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:35, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark 34 directors mentioned in the article