lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Indian language

message: A language with the name 'Indian' really exists. So this page should not be redirected to the languages of India. There is a number of ref. books are available in this matter. But unfortunately none of them is in English. Please remove the redirection from this page and restore the original version of the page. The article was an incomplete one which requires more reviews and edits from different sources. You can check one reliable link about this topic.
http://globalcommunity.bizhat.com/indian.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by IIHCR (talk • contribs) 
:Personal web pages hosted at bizhat are not considered reliable sources. --Onorem♠Dil 14:09, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Rowton cave

message: I think the correct spelling (from OS map) is Rowten with an E - and there is an article at Rowten Pot.  The two articles need to be combined, with plentiful redirects.  PamD (talk) 11:34, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've amended the 2 redlinks in this article from Rowton Pot to Rowten Pot and hope this is correct. PamD (talk) 09:01, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rowten?
Talk:Midvalley fairy shrimp

message: The website explictly states "Not all the information on our site is in the public domain" and does not state that this refers only to images. It's an annoyingly ambiguous statement but it has to be construed in the most negative fashion, namely that items on the website cannot be assumed to be in the public domain. For example in this article the species description may have been taken with permission from the first reference which may not be public domain - we don't know.
Where copyright is unclear it's the responsibility of the author to clarify it. In this case an assertion of permission is essential.
For this reason I've restored the speedy tag.
andy 13:09, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

message: because: The information not in the public domain on these sites is specified. Al US PD sites carry this legend, and all are used.USFWS pages are widely used throughout WP . 
:It is to be construed by common sense. Your proposed rule would require the deletion of all US PD derived material. Please discuss on WP:Copyright. 
Anyway, this is not speedy--read WP:CSD--speedy for copyvio is for unquestionable copyvios, where no assertion of permission is given is given,  and this is 1/ not unquestionable. 2/ permission is asserted.  In cases which do not meet "unquestionable" it must be discussed. 
Do not replace a speedy tag after an admin (like Pascal.Tesson)  has removed it. 
DGG (talk) 01:10, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I decline to delete this
Talk:Kirk (placename element)

message: A deletion tag was placed on this page and I have removed it.  AT PRESENT I think that would be rash, though that doesn't necessarily mean the article need be kept.  Originally we had a very interesting general article on kirk, but as it grew, some people wanted to split it up.  This list of places with the element kirk didn't fit into any of the new little articles, so I stuck it here.  It would be a shame to lose this - it is NOT all in the disambiguation article by any means.  This list is useful, and may well grow.  But I would have no objection to deletion if the material can be put elsewhere and then left alone.  --Doric Loon 13:21, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why so many splits to begin with?  This is an absurd amount of WP:FORKing for no apparent reason.  The pages aren't that big, there is no need for them to be split.  I guess PROD is the wrong way about to fixing this problem.  I say they should be merged back in. hbdragon88 19:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Talk:UAE Pro League Committee

message: I've created a new page for the 2008/09 season, can anyone create a template similiar to other Asian Leagues for the seasons? So we can keep track in the future
Druryfire (talk) 19:28, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Conservancy fairy shrimp

message: The website explictly states "Not all the information on our site is in the public domain" and does not state that this refers only to images. It's an annoyingly ambiguous statement but it has to be construed in the most negative fashion, namely that items on the website cannot be assumed to be in the public domain. For example in this article the species description may have been taken with permission from one of the references which may not be public domain - we don't know.
Where copyright is unclear it's the responsibility of the author to clarify it. In this case an assertion of permission is essential.
For this reason I've restored the speedy tag.
andy 13:32, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a note about the source of this article, that the text is taken from another site in the public domain.  I also reformated the article.  KP Botany 02:26, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: because: The information not in the public domain on these sites is specified. Al US PD sites carry this legend, and all are used.USFWS pages are widely used throughout WP . 
It is to be construed by common sense. Your proposed rule would require the deletion of all US PD derived material--and all PD material, for this exception applies whether stated or unstated--no site can give permission for material it does not own or have under free license. Please discuss on WP:Copyright.  
Anyway, this is not speedy--read WP:CSD--speedy for copyvio is for unquestionable copyvios, where no assertion of permission is given is given,  and this is 1/ not unquestionable. 2/ permission is asserted.  In cases which do not meet "unquestionable" it must be discussed. 
Do not replace a speedy tag after an admin (like Pascal.Tesson)  has removed it. 
DGG (talk) 01:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a note about the source of this article, that the text is taken from another site in the public domain.  I also reformated the article.  KP Botany 02:26, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I decline to delete this
Talk:William Stone (Maryland governor)

message: I deleted the reference to the grant of land being made by "the then current Lord Baltimore" as being Charles, because, as far as I can see, Charles didn't succeed (as 3rd Earl) until the death of his father, Cecilius, in 1675 – and Stone himself died in 1660. Needs further checking! NinetyCharacters (talk) 19:04, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lord Baltimore
Talk:Members of the Australian House of Representatives, 1906–1910

message: Is someone able to add Commonwealth Liberal/Labour/Independent affiliations post 1909 merger to this list article? It already seems to have been done at the upper house equivalent at Members of the Australian Senate, 1907–1910. Timeshift (talk) 13:14, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-merger affiliations?
Talk:Linderiella occidentalis

message: The website explictly states "Not all the information on our site is in the public domain" and does not state that this refers only to images. It's an annoyingly ambiguous statement but it has to be construed in the most negative fashion, namely that items on the website cannot be assumed to be in the public domain. For example in this article the species description may have been taken with permission from one of the references which may not be public domain - we don't know.
Where copyright is unclear it's the responsibility of the author to clarify it. In this case an assertion of permission is essential.
For this reason I've restored the speedy tag.
andy 13:36, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

message: because: The information not in the public domain on these sites is specified. Al US PD sites carry this legend, and all are used.USFWS pages are widely used throughout WP . 
 It is to be construed by common sense. Your proposed rule would require the deletion of all US PD derived material--and all PD material, for this exception applies whether stated or unstated--no site can give permission for material it does not own or have under free license. Please discuss on WP:Copyright. 
Anyway, this is not speedy--read WP:CSD--speedy for copyvio is for unquestionable copyvios, where no assertion of permission is given is given,  and this is 1/ not unquestionable. 2/ permission is asserted.  In cases which do not meet "unquestionable" it must be discussed. 
Do not replace a speedy tag after an admin (like Pascal.Tesson)  has removed it. 
DGG (talk) 01:12, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I decline to delete this
Talk:Rowten Pot

message: Someone with access to caving guidebooks etc might like to have a look at Rowton cave and Rowten Pot.  From OS map and the linked database, Rowten with an E seems to be the right spelling - but I'm not clear whether there's a distinction between R Cave and R Pot (the R Cave article had redlinks to Rowton Pot, which I've amended to point to Rowten Pot).  I wondered about just Moving the Rowton Cave article to Rowten Cave, but thought I'd better leave it to someone with sources. Googling is inconclusive.  Lots of redirects needed, to pick up the pieces and prevent any future confusion.  PamD (talk) 08:59, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rowten/Rowton
Talk:Judith Holofernes

message: "married"??
as far as it can be said, all german sources point to a marriage to the father of her child, the drummer pola roy. I could not find any resource claiming his name to be manuel. Pola Roy, the drummer, is claimed to be called Sebastian Roy originally on his german wiki entry (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pola_Roy). Please confirm your citation, as i am no expert on the band/topic, just a natural german speaking reader who also does understand some english.
It is definitely not an important fact that her mother is homosexual. I beg you not to mention this in this encyclopedia. Finally this article is about Judith Holofernes and not about her mother. Therefore we needn't mention her son's name. He might be happy later not to be associated with his mother ;).
I don't know whether I understood this sentence correctly, but there aren't more copies of her album Kamikazefliege, even after her success with the group Wir sind Helden.
-- 79.212.109.54 (talk) 16:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There's 24 sources on the German language page, I will go through them and add them to the English article when I have time.  A13ean (talk) 14:40, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination for deletion 
Talk:Chief of the Air Staff (Pakistan)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 06:34, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Kindly also see this, I searched both on Google and it shows 75,000,000 most results of "Chief of the Air Staff Pakistan", and 68,800,000 results of the "Chief of Air Staff Pakistan" now it's clear which one is the common name and plus+ i already provided official name evidence and other Second, Third, Fourth posts articles are also using official names. 223.123.85.101 (talk) 06:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The technical requests section of requested moves is only for uncontroversial requests. This is controversial and has been contested, and I have started a full requested move as such. I make no comment on whether the page should be moved or not. (By the way, those links give me 55,700,000 and 55,600,000 results respectively; raw numbers over about 1,000 are estimates and untrustworthy, and at this scale there are going to be so many false positives anyway that a raw google hit count won't be reliable. Wikipedia:Search engine test is probably worth reading.) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:42, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Military history has been notified of this discussion. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 07:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Pakistan has been notified of this discussion. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 07:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 July 2023
Talk:Kōji (Heian period)

message: Kōji may refer to:
*Kōji (Heian period) (康治), Japanese era from 1142 to 1144
*Kōji (Muromachi period) (弘治), Japanese era from 1555 to 1558
This set of nengō used to be identified as
*Kōji (first) (康治), Japanese era from 1142 to 1144
*Koji (era) (弘治), Japanese era from 1555 to 1558
It was suggested that the period designations were clearer; and the same pattern seemed useful in the cases of other homonym pairs in the list of Japanese era names:
    * 976_ 貞元 |Jōgen (976 - 978)
    * 1046 永承 |Eishō (1046 - 1053)
    * 1099 康和 |Kōwa (1099 - 1104)
    * 1131 天承 |Tenshō (1131 - 1132)
    * 1142 康治 |Kōji (1142 - 1144) ---> [Jōgen (Heian period)]
    * 1207 承元 |Jōgen (1207 - 1211)
    * 1222 貞応 |Jōō (1222 - 1224)
    * 1278 弘安 |Kōan (1278 - 1288)
    * 1312 正和 |Shōwa (1312 - 1317)
    * 1361 康安 |Kōan (1361 - 1362)
    * 1381 弘和 |Kōwa (1381 - 1383)   —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ooperhoofd (talk • contribs). 
    * 1504 永正 |Eishō (1504 - 1521)
    * 1555 弘治 |Kōji (1555 - 1558) --> [Jōgen (Muromachi period)]
    * 1573 天正 |Tenshō (1573 - 1592)
    * 1652 承応 |Jōō (1652 - 1655)
    * 1926 昭和 |Shōwa (1926 - 1989)
If you have any further comments, questions, suggestions, etc. ..., please feel free to contribute as you see fit at Talk:Japanese era name. Ooperhoofd 13:56, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Homonyms
Talk:Sulfanilic acid

message: I noticed that in the 3-D module the amine substituting a hydrogen on the benzene ring had three hydrogen atoms instead of the two usual for a primary amine.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.148.87.78 (talk) 03:27, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: And also there is no hydrogen on any of the oxygen atoms. That's because it's a model of the real compound, not just a diagram of each individual functional group...as the article states, "Sulphanilic acid exists as a zwitterion". DMacks (talk) 03:31, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Molecular Module
Category talk:Transgender musicians

message: "Transsexual"? Yikes.
Yeah, I agree with this. First of all, "transsexual" is an outdated term that has fallen far out of use and is even considered to be moderately offensive by much of the community (if I may be personal for a second here, I'm trans, and the only people I have ever heard use this term since the very early 2000s are transphobes and truscum). And secondly, wtf does "transgender and transsexual" mean? Are those two distinct categories now? --StrexcorpEmployee (talk) 16:32, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If you would like to request that the title be changed, you will need to post it at categories for discussion. The instructions are at WP:CFD#HOWTO, hope this is helpful! PohranicniStraze (talk) 06:05, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category name is bizarre
Category talk:Transgender politicians

message: Would Jackie Ryan and Jordan Evans be good fits for this category? Jackie was the first openly elected trans official in Massachusetts http://www.freedomforallamericans.org/the-first-openly-transgender-elected-official-in-massachusetts-calls-for-full-protections/https://www.hillaryclinton.com/feed/jackie-ryan/ and is also a state committeewoman for the Massachusetts Democratic Party https://www.massdems.org/your-party/state-committee. Jordan is the only openly elected trans woman republicanhttp://www.washingtonblade.com/2017/01/23/trump-team-campaign-officials-attend-log-cabin-party/, a local GOP official http://commonwealthmagazine.org/politics/a-transgender-republican-appeals-to-baker/, and is an elected constable http://linpub.blob.core.windows.net/pdf/2/95fe0a87-d42b-48e5-8466-bdf8a9c3a259.pdf and elected member of her library board http://www.townofcharlton.net/library.htm http://www.wbur.org/radioboston/2016/04/14/republican-transgender-rights. 64.134.168.55 (talk) 20:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Jackie Ryan and Jordan Evans
Talk:Batavia Institute

message: When I revised and expanded this article in 2009, I neglected to include footnotes, for which I apologize. I will add citations to this article as time permits. In the meantime (from memory):
*Information on the founders of Batavia Institute came from the original Charter (February 1853, p. 1), now located in the Archives at Beloit College in Wisconsin.
*Information on the structure itself came from the National Register Information System (NRIS) and the National Register of Historic Places Nomination Form.
*The wonderful details on the bid for the first Illinois normal school in 1857 came from a published history of Illinois State University (Normal, Illinois).
*Information on the later occupants of (and uses for) the building came from various sources, mainly Historic Batavia (1998) by Marilyn Robinson and Jeffery D. Schielke; the NRIS; and the National Register of Historic Places Nomination Form.
PlaysInPeoria (talk) 23:49, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Note on Sources
Talk:Liouville's equation

message: It would be nice to create a disambiguation page for Liouville equation.  Currently the similarly-named equation from physics hogs up all the possible variations of the name. Katzmik 14:11, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it possible to merge the two articles?  The main one already seems to have a section on geometry.  In any case, it would be better to call the article Louiville's equation (differential geometry) than to give it the wrong name just because the better ones are "already taken."  This is an encyclopedia, not a domain name registrar.. ;-)  -- SCZenz 14:15, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merging the two articles would not seem to be appropriate, as the inequalities are unrelated as far as I can see (I have seen some applications of the curvature equation in physics, and perhaps ultimately they are related, so I should say that I don't see the connection).  Actually wiki is a kind of a "domain name registrar" since someone looking for information on Liouville's equation will not think of typing "(differential geometry)" in the "search" window.  I think this case is actually very similar to the Wirtinger inequality, where the disambiguation page was created. Katzmik 07:21, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you think it's best, by all means go ahead.  The only thing you might need help with is deleting pages to make room for moves—let me know if so. -- SCZenz 07:32, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

text: You could also put a note in italics at the top of the physics article--see the top of Cosmic variance for an example--and then link to Liouville equations (differential geometry) or similar.  That's the usual way to do it when one use of a term is very common, but people might be looking for another. -- SCZenz 07:34, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Again, referring to the physics term as being very common is true with reference to physics articles.  In differential geometry, the curvature equation is more common. Katzmik 08:33, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguate Liouville 

message: As I remarked in edit, Liouville's equation is not an ordinary differential equation, but it is a partial differential equation, since the associated differential operator and therefore its solution is a function of two independent variables: also, having a look to its general solution, it can bee seen that it depends on a function, not on a finite number of parameters. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 12:21, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liouville's equation is a partial differential equation
Talk:Inclusive business

message: I removed a whole section on this which was a summary of a campaign by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) and SNV Netherlands Development Organization to promote inclusive businesses.  While the campaign may be very beneficial, this page should be about inclusive businesses in general  - if that effort (or any other) is having a big impact - changing what is known about how to develop inclusive businesses; significantly impacting public or academic perception; or something similar - it may be appropriate to put in details about that impact.  But we would need independent reliable sources that talked about that impact, rehashing a campaign to promote these businesses, or listing those who are involved in inclusive businesses is not encyclopedic.  -- SiobhanHansa 14:26, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individual organizations working in this area 

message: Why is a citation reuqested for "Large corporations traditionally target consumers in the middle and high-income segments of society, and established suppliers and service providers from the formal economy" - this is common sense in any market-based society!?!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.39.126.135 (talk) 09:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why citation needed? 

message: *2011-11-12: I did some cleanup. Needs more copyediting. Duplication Detector cleared article of copyvios. Bejinhan talks  11:56, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article checked - IEP
Talk:Müngsten Bridge

message: Thanks to Babelfish or google language tools, this article's completely FUCKED!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.60.252.166  (talk • contribs) 
Agreed! I manually re-translated the "history" section. However, I am not familiar with the construction vocabulary. Therefore, I also simplified the terminology. If someone else could translate the construction jargon properly ... it would be really appreciated! HagenUK (talk) 13:21, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Talk:HFB 320 Hansa Jet

message: "As of 2006[update], it remains the only civilian aircraft ever to use a forward-swept wing."
According to this, it is not true.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.72.25 (talk) 17:45, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled section 

message: A plan view, picture or diagram, is needed. 94.30.84.71 (talk) 23:24, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plan view needed 

message: None of the photos makes this feature visible. Surely a photo exists that better shows the wing design?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.51.29.228 (talk) 01:56, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Only one on the Commons shows the wing sweep clearly, which I have now added. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 10:37, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The aircraft's most defining feature are the forward-swept wings 

message: The citation style of this article has been changed recently without discussion. This really ought to have gone to talk page, as per WP:BRD, and reasoned out here with agreement, rather than been edit-warred into place. The style used on the article had been in place for roughly a decade, and I don't think it is clear which option to go for when bringing it into conformance, but whichever option it should be, discussion should be engaged in on this talk page if it has become contentious. Kyteto (talk) 22:06, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:CITEVAR considers helpful . There was no consistent style before merging them: 16 citations + 4 Bibliography (and only 3 used). I choose to harmonize the ref style to the style most used for the article.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 00:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation style
Talk:Llanharry

message: I've conducted a major overhaul of this article as it held spurious (and slanderous) personal material, and information that was more suited to a local paper than an encyclopaedia. I removed the section on local policing, the trouble with youth congregations and the contact address to the local councillor. This page still needs tidying, but opinion and local colour should not be placed on this page. Apart from that it's a good start.--FruitMonkey 14:34, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:National Evangelical Lutheran Church

message: The list of pastors here matches closely with the list of pastors for National Lutheran Church in Calumet, MI.  The early history matches as well.  National in Calumet joined the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS) in the early 1980's.  Any information on this concurrence would be appreciated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bsweinkauf (talk • contribs) 03:19, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  National, Calumet 