Talk:Bosenova

message: I have written a rather absurd interpretation of quantum mechanics 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fx303#Vector_Energy_Interpretation_of_Quantum_Mechanics
which, however, is based on solid math and science references.
''
The purpose of this interpretation is not a serious attempt to explain QM, rather to provide a means for alternate views to be expressed through semantic games over "real" and "imaginary" numbers and when to toss the imaginary component.  This is for the purpose of helping someone see it in a new light and come up with a real explanation.
The VEIQM would run like:
The missing atoms are not missing.  They converted to negative vector energy photons and went to the universe's bank of energy-time uncertainty from which other parts of the universe can borrow.  Somewhere, a bunch of atoms were needed, so that void borrowed from uncertain energy-time and brought them into existence there (wherever there is).   To conserve stuff, whatever was needed took place (like creating a neutrino - hah) and all laws were satisfied.''
''
As silly as it sounds, maybe someone finds a new line of inquiry and actually figures it out from reading this.
I propose the idea to you as last editor of that article, the above is my contribution and explanation of intent.
Your call what to do with it, as a newcomer I would request to defer to you on this issue.
Fx303 (talk) 14:13, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Welcome, and thanks for contributing! I was the last editor of that article however I only did a minor formatting edit of the layout to conform to Wikipedia's Manual of Style and I have no knowledge or expertise on the subject. I forwarded this message to Bosenova's Talk page and to WikiProject Physics' Talk page where I'm sure someone can help you with this. Sounds like it could be viewed by some editors as violating Wikipedia's Original Research policy however you mentioned it was based on "solid math and science references" so just be sure to cite your references, and go ahead and be bold! I'll help with any copy editing or formatting you may need. Expanding stubs is in my opinion the most productive way to contribute to Wikipedia so I'm grateful we have knowledgeable editors such as yourself that can do that.  OlEnglish (talk) 22:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forwarded from [[User:OlEnglish|OlEnglish]]'s [[User talk:OlEnglish|talk page]], new contributor seeking help. 

message: Any relevance?
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/23625/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.127.128.2 (talk) 17:12, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  BEC Acoustic Blackhole 

message: See Link
http://www.lhcfacts.org/?tag=bosenova  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.127.128.2 (talk) 18:51, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  LHC Bosenova Information and Bosenove Micro-Blackhole Debate 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bosenova. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080705163559/http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/generalscience/supernova_lab_010723.html to http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/generalscience/supernova_lab_010723.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:58, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified