Talk:Christian mysticism

message: There is some rule somewhere on picture size (I think Ywore reminded me on that one), but I've forgotten where... Anyway, according to  picture sizes may be accomondated. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 11:10, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you wish to  accomondate something? Or you are telling me that is OK to do so? Hafspajen (talk) 11:30, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Eh... good question. Both, actually. I was corrected several times for adjusting pictures; but according to this help-article it seems to be acceptable. Greetings, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 15:26, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure it is. That is why the tool exist...Hafspajen (talk) 19:42, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

text: Hi, you made some very nice additions to the article. Thanks for your suggestion, but there is a good reason to do so.  The reason is that these pictures are now the same size of the sidebar. Also these pictures are quite big in real life and the thumb size is not quite enough to give a god image, for example Stigmatization of St Francis, by Giotto, is covering a whole wall in reality. Same reason why Sabbatai Zevi uses 350px in the lead. We already agreed that we will keep the size of the pictures like they are, hope that it is not to big problem for you. It is not forbidden to do so. Logged in users can choose from widths between 120px and 300px,  .          I think that covers it.  Are you interested in mysticism?  Hafspajen (talk) 13:54, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  The size of the images is a minor detail and I won't be upset about it one way or the other. Editor2020 (talk) 21:31, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

text: That is lovely, because you really do a good work on Wiki. Hafspajen (talk) 16:16, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture size 

message: Is there a reason that all of the icons and art are post-Schism? Are there issues with with using early icons of the Church or post-Schism Orthodox icons? Mecurl (talk) 18:44, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iconography Examples are limited to post-Schism 

message: Eastern Orthodox mysticism and :Hesychasm are suspiciously missing here. Western bias? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:49, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eastern Orthodox mysticism and Hesychasm 

message: At Wikipedia: WikiProject Council, I have made a proposal for a new WikiProject  - WikiProject Mysticism. Please let me know whether any one reading this article would be interested in joining such a WikiProject. Vorbee (talk) 18:01, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal for new WikiProject

message: This article uses "c.q." a few times, presumably as an abbreviation for "casu quo" which is a somewhat obscure bit of Latin. I would like to edit those instances to be clearer, but I am not certain of the intended meaning. For example, in the lede paragraph I'm unsure of the relationship between "contemplatio" and  "theoria." Can someone help clean up this mystical Latin? 73.242.100.208 (talk) 13:24, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the term; it seems to be a 'standard' term in Dutch, but not in other western languages. Dutch equivalents would be "oftewel" ( in other words, i.e., aka) and "danwel" (fairly untranslatable, but "or" would come close). Regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 14:21, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  c.q.