lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ghanaian name

message: I found a couple references and on put on this article.  The subject looks to pass WP:N but the references could be better addressed for WP:V if anyone has better references please add them.  Jeepday 12:54, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I noticed that this article has a misleading article title and is a duplicate of another title "Akan names". The various ethnic groups in Ghana have a completely different system so the Akan system cannot possibly speak for all. The title should have been "Akan names" but since another article with the same title exist I suggest a merge the two articles or deletion of this one.
Masssly (talk) 20:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading article title Suggestion
Talk:Tunghai University

message: I've edited the article to remove the brochure/marketing guff. It is now comprised of simple, verifiable statements primarily from the university's own website. --Shannonr 08:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Edit
Talk:Open Base Station Architecture Initiative

message: Should the page title be OBSAI rather than Obsai? The specification uses OBSAI throughout, as does the remainder of the article.--Gareth8118 12:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, as per the guidelines on article titles, the name should be Open Base Station Architecture Initiative so I boldly moved it thereto. W Nowicki (talk) 18:27, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: Further review of this article shows several spelling mistakes and a general lack of wikification. I know a fair bit about the subject matter, I may take a look at doing it in a couple of weeks but until then I've tagged with  and .--Gareth8118 19:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: The chapter Reference point interfaces contains nonsense. RP1 interface is not "interface between the base station and the user equipment", it is interface between control block and the other three blocks, as it is said in the previous chapter. Viewing the history, I notice that the chapter was originally about WiMax R1 interface. But R1 has nothing to do with OBSAI.
If that incorrect sentence is removed, what remains in the chapter is just the release dates of the specifications. Is that information actually needed? Should the whole chapter be removed, or should we move the information about RP1...RP4 from previous chapter into this chapter?
-- PauliKL (talk) 12:57, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No comments? OK, I removed the chapter Reference point interfaces, combined relevant info to chapter BTS structure, added sub-headings and some more info. -- PauliKL (talk) 16:13, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference point interfaces 

message: Does OBSAI still exist? Was it maybe merged with CPRI?
Clear: the link shall be removed. But, can we replace it by something better than archive.org?
In Sept 2019 obsai.com was archived in archive.org. The captures in 2022 show already the domain seller. BernieM (talk) 23:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  obsai.com and obsai.org are offered by domain grabbers
Talk:Raccomandata con Ricevuta di Ritorno

message: This band is considered one of the more important Italian progressive rock bands. See for example ratings on  and review on . RRR are also notable for having released a narrative concept album. Their LP has been reissued on CD. I don't understand why the article is nominated for deletion. Narssarssuaq 12:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion?
Talk:Sleeping in Flame

message: I just added a comma to make the sentence about Little Red Riding Hood make more sense, but it needs one more change. She shows up "to tell Walker he is dangerous." The problem is, there are two possible antecedents for "he" in that context - Walker and the son - and this phrasing, as it currently stands on the page, doesn't indicate which of them is intended. I believe it's the son, but it's been over a decade since I read the book, and my copy is not currently accessible to me. It would be great if someone who has a copy on hand could clarify that sentence. 4.131.33.246 10:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Her actual words are: "You're dangerous", addressed to Walker, so I've amended it accordingly. Thanks. PhilipC 13:55, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary Correction 
Talk:List of war crimes

message: simply seems too long, and still needs expansion. WT79 (speak to me | editing patterns | what I been doing) 18:13, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: *Split by war or country. -- Maudslay II (talk) 12:34, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

text: what about by century 149.20.252.131 (talk) 18:15, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

text: Sounds good. Dunutubble (talk) 16:23, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems enough, will close the split discussion. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: The proposal to split an article because it is "too long" is a dumbing down exercise. But more than that, it dilutes and diminishes the serious nature of the subject itself. There must be a point of reference for this subject which is both comprehensive and general with references to sources of information and details on the contexts that these crimes occurred in. Hence a separate article detailing Britain's list of post 1945 military operations and genocides in Africa and the Far East requires inclusion in a general list of war crimes and not quietly tucked away within another ("too long") article. 2A02:C7E:1C6E:B400:3DA9:E027:4EFE:6AB0 (talk) 09:14, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  split 

message: I think it would be a good idea to reorganize this article in the following ways:
1. Only put 2 types of things in this article: lists of notable/major war crimes, and summaries of incidents during a specific conflict/time period. This is because it is impossible to list all, or even most, war crimes in a specific area. Instead, users should be directed towards the topic-specific list for a complete list of war crimes (and not just the major ones).
2. Sort this differently. I think the current chronological sorting format is hard to read, so I think it would be better to sort it by general area/general time period instead (eg. group modern-era imperial war crimes together). This pastebin would be an example of such a sorting format.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SentientObject (talk • contribs) 01:05, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganize article (mainly by changing how things are sorted)  

message: The article makes strenuous effort (the Sudan article) to point out genocide, and ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity. However, I'm unsure of the treatment of sources. It is understood that "genocide" is a label thrown around freely by both sides, however the numbers look fairly egregious. This is not to mention attacking aid workers, looting food meant for the people, &c. Overall, the 2023 war in Sudan article is very good and I just wanted to point out that the war in Darfur was reopened in 2023 and maybe that should be be discussed here, since it is a fairly detailed compilation.  98.109.137.129 (talk) 11:20, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of 2023 war in Sudan?
Talk:Annabelle Bond

message: Ms Bond once climbed all seven summits in aid of charity: a great achievement. to describe her as a mountain climber suggests that she does that sort of thing regulary (lke bonington or hinkes). she does not, it was just the once. her website is merely full of pictures of her with 'famous people' (and james bond) at flashy events. there's not a great deal of mountain climbing going on! the facts suggest that she is a fund raiser and socialite.
:You appear to be putting personal bias into your decision to edit this article. I really don't think that there is a set frequency one has to climb mountains to be a mountain climber! If someone who has climbed all Seven Summits isn't a mountain climber, than who is? Professional guides only? 
:Then it leads down a slippery slope. How often does one have to climb to be a mountain climber? Two mountains a week? A lot of climbers have day jobs and don't climb often but are still climbers.
:You may not like her and you may think that she climbed the mountains for attention, and that's fine, but if someone who has completed the extremely difficult and rare feat of climbing all seven highest mountains in the world (and became the fastest woman ever to do so) isn't a mountain climber, than who is? Maybe Edmund Hillary, Reinhold Messner and that's it. --Mezaco 21:38, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
File talk:Billbuckner.jpg

message: The article as it currently stands at Bill Buckner literally reads as follows:
:With two outs and no one on base, New York struck back with three straight singles off Calvin Schiraldi, and tied the game on a wild pitch by Bob Stanley. Mookie Wilson fouled off several pitches before hitting a slow roller to Buckner at first base. Aware of Wilson's speed, Buckner tried to rush the play. As a result, the ball rolled to the left side of his glove,[22] through his legs, and into shallow right field, allowing Ray Knight to score the winning run from second base.[23] Had Buckner fielded the ball with Wilson safe at first, the score would have remained tied for the next Mets batter. Had Buckner put out Wilson at first base, Game 6 would have gone to an 11th inning. 
And the image illustrates this point, very effectively I feel! - Chris.sherlock (talk) 05:54, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Jameh Mosque of Isfahan

message: Is this mosque also known as the Blue Mosque of Isfahan? I have some text-books that refer to a Jame mosque in isfahan of similar dates - if so, it is supposed to have one of the earliest know examples of a jali screened window - does anyone have a picture? --Joopercoopers 13:30, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think what you are looking for is actually Shah Mosque AKA the blue mosque of Isfahan. Nevertheless, you can find more pictures of Jame Mosque here. - Marmoulak 16:38, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions

message: I just finished some revision and expansion of the page, but I wanted to make one possible suggestion for the future: the "present-day" section could be replaced with a larger "Architecture" section (or something to that effect) where the mosque, as it currently stands, can be more fully described in detail. The history section is very much needed, but since not all elements of the building are reliable dated some things might be easier to describe in another section, instead of trying to make them fit in one of the historical periods. Even elements like the Seljuk domes and the mihrab of Uljaytu/Oljeitu, which are precisely dated, are important enough that they could still be described in more technical detail in a separate section (and you can probably find academic studies that focus on them). Some readers might even appreciate a more systematic physical description of the mosque to compliment the historical summary.</br>
For a general description of the building, the ArchNet entry might be very useful as it's accessible, detailed, and has a large catalogue of pictures with accompanying captions. (Just note that ArchNet is not an academic source itself, so if it conflicts with other sources then scholarly sources should take priority.) Cheers, R Prazeres (talk) 23:18, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  General comment and suggestion
Talk:World Series of Darts (2006 tournament)

message: Good spot - I've just double checked the result don't know how that sneaked in..... Seedybob2 21:48, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kuczynski v Mardle
Talk:2007 plot to behead a British Muslim soldier

message: This article is much more comprehensive except for the criticism of the raid, BUT 2007 Plot to Behead a British Muslim Soldier is a much more descriptive title. Hypnosadist 13:34, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree completely AndrewRT(Talk) 18:35, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree lets do it! AndrewRT(Talk) 21:47, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: The article stated as if it was fact that "the plot involved kidnapping a British Muslim soldier" etc. Although these claims have appeared in the public domain, there is a good chance they will be disputed (ie, if the defendants plead not guilty). Although it is arguably not disputed yet, as they haven't had a chance to plead, with a court case coming up we can't assume that it won't be disputed either. What is a fact is that newspapers reported there was a plot to behead someone, not that the plot existed. I have edited the article to reflect this. It may seem overly fussy, but now that proceedings are "active", this is an article about a forthcoming court case. We can't say "The group spent months to compile a hit list of 25 potential targets" as if it is a fact, especially as "the group" clearly refers to the defendants in this case. Under English law at least, they are not guilty of compiling a hit list or anything else unless a court finds otherwise. Also - although I have edited the section rather than removing it, I feel it should be removed per WP:BLP. At this point, the men named in this article have been "Charged with failing to disclose information" and "Charged with supplying terrorists", as the article correctly states, and that is all. Police and prosecutors have NOT alleged that there was a plot to behead anyone. We might perhaps suppose that they will do so when the case is heard next year, but they have not done so. I realise there are sources for these claims and therefore have not removed them, as I imagine other editors might object. But I hope other editors will consider the issues I have raised and perhaps respond. Hobson 18:07, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe these newspaper claims should be in the article, but as you have done with your edit correctly shown to be newspaper reports not facts. Hypnosadist 00:17, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The plot

message: The article does not say if these guys are currently detained or not, nor does it mention if a court case is forthcoming. It only says people have been charged. If anybody has this info, it would be nice...  --Commking 02:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Heres the BBC reports on the trial http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7250697.stm . (Hypnosadist) 13:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Heres the secretly taped recordings. (Hypnosadist) 13:29, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Current status

message: What an unusual title. Looking at the history it seems to have been decided to call it this. But shouldn't the Plot not have a capital P? --➨♀♂Candlewicke  ST   19:55, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd title
Talk:Jali

message: There seems to be thousands of older sources in the public domain that discuss jali.
*
 Peaceray (talk) 18:46, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public domain sources
Talk:The Transformers

message: Why do people have to make such a big deal of a movie that critics are not that wild about and what a lot of people are saying is boreing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.181.171.10 (talk • contribs) 23:32, 6 July 2007
:Ah... you mean the movie that has been breaking box office records around the world? --  JediLofty User ¦ Talk 09:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big deal 

message: Perhaps an overview of the franchise and a timeline should go here? mkehrt 17:27, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah. I keep saying that I want to turn this into a general overview of the entire franchise, but I'm an awful procrastinator. Chris Cunningham 10:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overview 

message: It should be re-written to mention that the toys came first, then the comics and cartoon were based on them. psy1123eu 06:59, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! --  JediLofty User ¦ Talk 09:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorder
Wikipedia talk:Adminship survey

message: The title of this is ambiguous. Are you surveying admins, or is it a survey about adminship, to which anyone can and should contribute? Consider renaming. --Dweller 13:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ambiguous article name

message: As with all such surveys, there are a lot of leading questions. I think the outcome is going to be biased towards whatever the writer (unconsciously) wants to see. --Kim Bruning 13:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments about the survey

message: I added the survey to :Category:Non-talk pages with subpages automatically signed by HagermanBot. Hipocrite - «Talk» 15:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: HagermanBot doesn't sign comments starting with '#'. --ais523 17:50, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot 

message: "Certain !votes deserve to be ignored outright" is a leading question with a 'yes' bias. You can't change it now as people have responded, but for the next time try a more neutral approach. JoeSmack Talk 16:33, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Canvassing!  I kid, I kid... - CHAIRBOY (☎) 17:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Certain !votes deserve to be ignored outright" 

message: What is the purpose of this survey? What will be happening with the results, if anything? --Majorly (o rly?) 20:37, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume that people intend on looking at the results to determine where people want a change. -Amarkov moo! 21:25, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would hope so. Alex43223 Talk | Contribs | E-mail | C 09:43, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the purpose of this? 

message: As part of the section on existing administrators, I think it would be good to ask if the respondants if they have examined or know about the current RFC's on Use of administrator privileges?  Since the respondants seem interested in if adminstartors are acting acceptably maybe we can uncover some reasons for the low number of responses.--BirgitteSB 16:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the question on RFCs from the last poll might shed some light on that question. Christopher Parham (talk) 17:30, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Add another question? I don't see why not. Do note the date/time the question was added. --Kim Bruning 00:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Please do. - Mailer Diablo 03:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the general consensus is that RFCs on user conduct are pretty much pointless, and have been so for a long time. It's just that apparently nobody's had a better idea yet. >Radiant< 09:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  IS it possible to add another question?
Talk:George Washington Bridge Bus Station

message: the facility's home page at Port Authority's website (http://www.panynj.gov/commutingtravel/bus/html/gwb.html) and throughout the facility's section of the site uses "George Washington Bridge Bus Station" as the appellation.
why is article entitled "George Washington Bridge Bus Terminal"?--68.173.2.68 (talk) 07:57, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It shouldn't have been. It appears the mover thought that it was the proper name as the signage at the adjacent 175th St subway station uses "terminal", but as is noted here, the name is actually GWB Bus Station. I moved it back, though there may be a few dozen links to the redirect. oknazevad (talk) 18:59, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  why "George Washington Bridge Bus Terminal"? 
Talk:Akatsuki makes its move

message: I don't have the time to write a plot summary. Could someone else do it? — Nazrila 13:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub class 

message: anyone have any idea what these are to be used for???
in the hour special they showed 4 of them and i have them written down
*for what i assume is the first episode(Homecoming)
**Shi
**a small tsu
*For what i assume is the second episode(Akatsuki Makes Its Move)
**Pu
**U
i'm not fluent with Japaneses so I'm not sure if it spells out something or what ever but i thought I'd ask if anyone knew
i will also be posting this in the discussion for (Homecoming) so just to get a greater collaboration.
thanks for listening Ancientanubis 21:07, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The symbols spell out the name of the new show so far, Shippuuden. The small tsu makes the symbol 'pu' have 2 times the continent sound (It gives it the ppu look in romaji). The keyword segment is probably a contest in Japan that Dattebayo(The fansub company) left in there for fun. Yagikaru 14:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ah, that makes more senseAncientanubis 03:55, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Present Keyword
Talk:Type 63 assault rifle

message: If the name is really the 'Type 63 assault' rifle, shouldn't the main page be 'Type 63 assault rifle' and 'Type 68 assault rifle' redirect to the correct page? Semi-Lobster (talk) 17:18, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If no one objects, I'll move this soon. Ominae (talk) 03:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Looks like no one's objecting. Will move it now. Ominae (talk) 03:41, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Insensitive (House)

message: The "I got shot" quote should be removed.  It's kind of dumb to have it there unless you have the entire dialog, or, at the very least, what the girl said first.  Cameron's sex comment should also be removed for a similar reason.
I'll try to find the complete quote and fix it. Please remember to sign your posts. BethEnd 15:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the entire text of both quotes in question.Cheers — WilsBadKarma (Talk) 16:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Happy Hooligan

message: Does anyone know if this comic strip fell into PD?  The author died 71 years ago.--Ivo talk / contribs (join Project Portugal) 01:10, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public domain status 
Talk:Monona Grove High School

message: I added two new references for data in the information box, which created new references, but was unable to correct the format for those references as the editing option for the references did not allow me to make changes.. This will need to be corrected. Bethfahlberg (talk) 15:34, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, and thank you for bringing your concerns to the talk page. I have resolved the issues. Regards, Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 02:13, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Bermuda rig

message: I removed this :Image:Bermuda sloop work boat.jpg from the article because it didn't show the rig very clearly and cluttered the article. - Davandron | Talk 13:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed image 
Talk:Walton-le-Dale

message: Much of the historical information here is 'lifted' straight from another publication from 1901. A history solely based on only one written in 1901 is not of much use. Time to re-write I think. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlie odd (talk • contribs) 13:59, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Info

message: I used to live on St Mary's Close, and the postal address was/is "Walton-le-Dale, PRESTON, PR5 4xx". Nonetheless, this was/is in the Bamber Bridge West electoral ward.
How far from Cinnamon Hill does Walton-le-Dale actually extend? Does it really extend almost to Brownedge Lane/Road?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uncriticalsimon (talk • contribs) 22:13, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  How far does Walton-le-Dale extend?