Talk:Orchid (album)

message: << the start end of "Requiem" was placed at the beginning of "The Apostle in Triumph" >>
What does this mean? Slicing 00:43, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garbled syntax 

message: One thing I wonder about, is if any of you editing this article have heard "Black metal" before.
This album has no aspects of Death metal , Even the roars on this album and Morningrise are  higher and more along the lines of the 90s Scandinavian Black metal.
It says in the article, that the album has the signature aspects of Opeth, the roaring and heavy guitar of death metal, And "Progressive" elements like singing and acoustic guitar, Bergtatt has screaming vocals, as well as clean vocals and acoustic guitar passages , And also, the "Heavy guitar" is in the style of black metal and not death metal, Not saying they didn't have more "Progressive" elements (They definitely seemed strange among the other 90s Black metal groups), Just saying that's not a good example of what's more "Progressive" about them.
Go listen to Nile and Cannibal Corpse, Then listen to Bergtatt and other early black metal albums and tell me which one is more similar. There's little, or nothing, Death metal about Orchid or Morningrise
  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spydrfish (talk • contribs) 17:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Black metal definately needs to be in there. Anyone disagree? If not, I will add it. Erzsébet Báthory(talk|contr.) 13:27, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Alright, as soon as you find the link, feel free to add it. Make sure the link is a reliable source, or it's likely to be deleted. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 04:26, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre

message: :Image:Opeth orchid.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Opeth orchid.jpg

message: Really? Can we find a source on that? -MetalKommandant (talk) 00:32, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it doesn't seem like black metal. BacktableSpeak to Meabout what I have done 04:38, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Black Metal

message: Here it says "In Mist" but on Opeth.com it says "In The Mist"?
So I really have no idea, does anyone have any proof or something like that for which one is right?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.52.27.178 (talk) 03:16, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Allmusic says it's "In Mist" (here). Best place to check would be the back of the CD/LP though (I don't own this album, so I can't personally check). MrMoustacheMM (talk) 20:48, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the name "In The Mist She Was Standing" or "In Mist She Was Standing"? 

message: Just sounds a bit daft to quote one word.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.159.216.237 (talk) 09:43, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The album was well-received critically, even being called "unique" 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Orchid (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110617081149/http://www.opeth.com/index.php/discography/show/tpl/orchid-session-diary to http://www.opeth.com/index.php/discography/show/tpl/orchid-session-diary
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110617080629/http://www.opeth.com/index.php/discography/show/tpl/orchid to http://www.opeth.com/index.php/discography/show/tpl/orchid
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110617082537/http://www.opeth.com/index.php/discography/show/tpl/orchid-session-diary-2 to http://www.opeth.com/index.php/discography/show/tpl/orchid-session-diary-2
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140727070346/http://www.opeth.com/home/chapters/chapter-iii to http://www.opeth.com/home/chapters/chapter-iii
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:38, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified