Talk:Otto Rössler

message: The LHC launches this wednesday, September 9th, we should stay alert to any related events!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.45.71.82 (talk) 13:36, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Still here.129.2.167.219 (talk) 18:32, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous discussions without headers

message: Dr. Rossler's history as a visiting Theoreretical Physics position at Lyngby University in Denmark was removed without prior discussion.  I temporarily reverted the reference while it is researched for verification.  I suggest that if the reference is disputed that a few days be given to verify the reference.  --Jtankers (talk) 01:13, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I verified the reference at Otto DBpedia.org and University of Tübingen, Germany and Physical Review On-Line Archive.  --Jtankers (talk) 01:16, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits without Discussion 

message: Referring to the "LHC controversy", should there be an article about those "Hippie"/"New Age"/"(so-called) Humanist" scientists defending the Good Nature against the Nasty Human Technology?  (There is a bunch of them in the French speaking world, which I know best: Hubert Reeves, Albert Jacquard are clearly at the forefront of those.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.209.199.21 (talk) 13:38, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hippie scientists article? 

message: I don't (yet) have an opinion on whether this should be deleted, but I notice this:
: 
:: Rössler was born in Berlin. At the age of 17, he became an amateur radio operator (DR 9KF). After considering becoming a monk, Rössler chose to major in medicine, with a speciality in immunology, for ethical reasons.
: 
The material appears BEFORE any statement about why he's notable.  That shouldn't happen. Michael Hardy (talk) 03:40, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Though I agree with Michael and the article really needs a re-write, the prod description of not notable is incorrect as with minimal research it's clear that even outside his notability for his opposition to the LHC, he has achieved notability in the fields of chaos theory and Rössler attractor. Even in its present state the article meets the first four of the general notability guidelines, I will remove the prod and suggest the editor if he wishes to pursue the deletion take it to AFD. Regards Khukri 07:56, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've trimmed down the article and removed alot of ambiguous statements, that he was the strongest critic etc. The article certainly gave undue weight to his anti-LHC position including self published statements. I've added a reliably sourced article to show his involvement with the lawsuit etc and added his primary notability in the lede of the Rössler attractor etc. Khukri 09:08, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  The "Rössler Attractor" itself is not notable, even though it has a Wikipedia page.  Note the "Citation Needed" tags at that page.  There's an article on the "Rössler Attractor" at Scholarpedia, but that article is co-authored by Rössler himself, hence "original research" Cgwaldman (talk) 17:08, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Google scholar, 1600 other papers cite Rössler's fundamental work on this attractor. "Rössler+attractor" Google books also has around 1400 hits. To me, that makes it look quite notable. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:21, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  reorganize this article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Otto Rössler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070313161815/http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/Chemie/Chemie/PC/Profs/roessler.html to http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/Chemie/Chemie/PC/Profs/roessler.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:45, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)