Talk:Mahatma

message: Mahatmas and Mahandas are the same name for Gandhis first name. Juicyboy 325. 11/12/04
"Great White Brotherhood" was not a term used by Blavatsky. I have removed that reference.
-Brucey
This is incorrect.  Gandhi's first name is 'Mohandas' (Mohan-das) which has no etymological relation to the world 'Mahatma'. --Bigbenboa 22:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should this page be separated into articles on the Hindu and Theosophist versions of Mahatma?  It seems to me that they're completely different concepts. Rojomoke 13:45, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split? 

message: Mahatma is a Sanskrit word that means, more-or-less, "saint".  As such, the current text of the article gives undue weight to the term as used by the Theosophical Society, is almost a completely different use of the term; many, many more people use the common Indian sense--see for instance the articles on Mahatma_Gandhi, Adi Shankara, and Prahlad Keshav Atre.  It is as if the article on saints had extensive coverage of the saints significant to a tiny group of Indian christians, and almost nothing on the Roman Catholic saints.  My preference in this would be to start an article Mahatma (Theosophical Society) and reference it in the main article.  Are there other opinions? Randwolf 07:36, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would suggest a separate section within this article to clarify the distinctions between the two concepts. Aburesz 16:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Probably a separate article isn't necessary, but there is certainly a need for more clarification.
On the "letters": the text states that these alleged letters existed as if they are physical entities. Is this correct? Can we have a reference for it? The text makes it sound like Blavatsky was passing physical letters on to other people. Correct, if so, what is the ref?
Sardaka (talk) 08:26, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

text: including the "ascended master" notion from pseudo-theosophy at the very top of this article gives a complete misrepresentation of the meaning of the word and its usage in Indian history. The "ascended master" idea is also heavily skewed from what the term meant to early theosophists. The article currently says “Mahātmā is similar in usage to the modern English term saint and can be translated to "ascended master",” which is an abomination of the meaning. It means “great soul” or “great self” literally; that is all that needs to be said in the opening paragraph. Differences in how people have interpreted the term can be given later in the article, with clarity as to who is interpreting it in what way. Currently the article gives the impression that the ascended masters interpretation is the correct one. 66.214.190.43 (talk) 18:36, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: Substituted at 18:29, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. On WP:UE grounds. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 04:45, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Mahātmā →  – Mahatma is accepted as an English word in dictionaries like Oxford, Random house, Collins . The noun is commonly asscoiated with Mahatma Gandhi, where the diacritics are not used. Redtigerxyz  Talk  14:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 June 2022