lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Domingo Siazon Jr.

message: This article is connected to category 'Chinese filipinos', yet there is no indication of Chinese descent in the article.  Can someone find the facts and correct the article textgor delete the category, based on the facts.  Thanks Hmains 03:06, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese filipino  

message: English is not listed as the languages that he can speak fluently..?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.107.163.83 (talk) 08:32, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  English 
Talk:Dominic Barrett

message: The article currently gives the subject's date and place of birth as "30 July 1985, Cambridge", but this isn't referenced.  The only live reference on the page here which gives any information says that he's from Walton-on-the-Naze, with nothing about his age.  Is there a more definitive source for this information available? Tevildo (talk) 20:26, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed for date and place of birth 
Talk:Market overhang

message: If you do a Google search for "Market Overhang" you'll see that the definition has more to do with a company having a large amount of shares that no one knows what they're going to do with.  This lowers investor confidence.
http://financial-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Market+overhang
http://www.trading-glossary.com/m0082.asp
http://en.mimi.hu/stockmarket/overhang.html
"Overhangitis" is not a word at all. - Richfife 19:18, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm pretty sure this article is wrong 
Talk:North Union Railway

message: May I make a remark about the authorities quoted here?
Reed's exhaustive and scholarly book Crewe to Carlisle is merely "further reading", and apparently not used in generating the article. This is an extradordinary priority.
Butt, regarded as unreliable, has so many citations.
Wikipedia is a level three source, and so is Awdry. It is better to use other level three sources only in the absence of anything better.
And the original Acts are level one, the use of which is deprecated. Afterbrunel (talk) 10:25, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Priorities
Talk:Stodhart Tunnel

message: Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Stodhart Tunnel, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.pittdixon.go-plus.net/pft/stodhart-tunnel.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing. 
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
:*If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Stodhart Tunnel and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Stodhart Tunnel, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
:*If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Stodhart Tunnel with a link to where we can find that note. 
:*If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Stodhart Tunnel. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Stodhart Tunnel saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. 
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Dave.Dunford (talk) 16:47, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problem: Stodhart Tunnel
Talk:Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Company Ltd

message: I'm pretty certain that its proper title is **THE** Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Company Ltd —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.141.118.107 (talk • contribs) 10:25, September 15, 2006.
:Got a reference that says that?  If so, please list it. Slambo (Speak) 21:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subject name 

message: As far as I can tell this articles are about exactly the same thing? Pit-yacker 03:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger

message: On plates made by the company, and still in existance on carriages today, the use of "The" in title varies.   Without access to original documents, the dropping of "The" in this article allows it no to be lost amongst all other articles with headers commencing "The".
Which article is identical? Keith 16:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clearing previous points 

message: Railway Magazine said 1846, rather than 1841.Johnragla (talk) 11:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Openshaw move
Talk:Dominic L. Pudwill Gorie

message: * Generally the rule is not to mention future mission in the infobox. STS-400 is just a potential rescue mission, so this is even a worse idea, I think. 193.56.37.1 (talk) 08:44, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  STS-400 
Talk:John T. Morgan

message: Is this man a member of the Morgan Banking dinasty?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.164.52.89 (talk) 21:16, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[J.P. Morgan]] connection 

message: Regarding the move of this page, John T. Morgan (44%), John Morgan (41%), and J. T. Morgan (10%) are the only iterations of Morgan's name that constitute over 5% of references to him on newspapers.com in Alabama. Star Garnet (talk) 05:36, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name
Talk:Dominic Sandbrook

message: Surely one important point that no reviewer mentions is that this is the first post death of Falkender
All previous books memoirs faced legal onslaught from her
I suspect more to come 
Talk to Haines and Donoghue 77.76.73.58 (talk) 20:05, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wilson 

message: There are far too many cherry picked quotes in this article to make it seem balanced. Every single authored work is a quasi masterpiece based on the quotes used by favourable journalists. Balance this against the serious accusation that he has been caught out for "apparent plagiarism" (is that a sort of Schroedinger's Cat offence of blatant copying but apparently not blatantly copying? He either did or he didn't, so why the verbal obfuscation?). The article smells of paid editing or someone who either has a conflict of interest or no sense of NPOV. I'd never heard of this person until someone passed me an article he wrote about himself in the UK's worst tabloid (which incidentally was entirely self-congratulating). Note the precedence then on this person. I strongly advise that this article be shredded of all the rose tinted quotes about his published works and get back to hard facts. When an article is this pro subject and uber positive, it stinks of WP:NPOV, WP:OPINION and even WP:OR (because it's all spin to promote the subject). It needs a rewrite because this person is obviously no star if they are plagiarising other writer's work.146.199.128.158 (talk) 11:24, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, balance is needed in the article. However, the accusations appear to have been retracted fairly quickly and were not recorded. Dominic Sandbrook is still academically recognized and his academic work on 20th century British history is widely respected and influential. The article’s treatment of “apparent plagiarism” is in fact justified. JEBELLES (talk) 20:34, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV editing
Talk:Dominik Hrbatý

message: The name of this article should be changed to "Dominik Hrbaty" because that is the name used on the English-language websites of the official governing bodies of tennis, which are the Association of Tennis Professionals and the International Tennis Federation. That also is the name used on the English-language website of the Davis Cup. Finally, that is the name used on the English-language websites of the following Grand Slam tournaments: French Open (Roland Garros), Wimbledon, US Open.  Tennis expert (talk) 19:48, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: There is a long, ongoing discussion at WP:Tennis about the tournament tables found in tennis articles on English-language Wikipedia (e.g., this type of table). The discussion is about whether the "official sponsored name" of a tournament - such as Pacific Life Open - or another tournament name without the sponsor - such as Indian Wells Masters - must be used in those articles. Please join the discussion here. Thanks.  Tennis expert (talk) 09:21, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for wider input on discussion at WikiProject Tennis
Talk:Lew (locomotive)

message: With the warning comment in the text in place, and as it's a subject of controversy I'm not going to make a change about Lew's fate without discussion, but having just read the releavnt section of Bradley's book, I propose the following addition:
:According to one source, Lew was derelict for several years, and finally scrapped in February 1957.
Any thoughts?  — Voice of Clam 20:33, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Resurrecting this discussion after 12 years

message: Please see WP:BRD.  Wikipedia encourages you to be bold in making constructive edits.  However, other editors disagree with your changes and have reverted your edits.  The next step is to discuss those potential changes here on the talk page.  Please contribute your thoughts above or start a new topic below.  Wikipedia is a collaborative process and I hope you will find working with other editors a rewarding experience.  Simply repeatedly making the same change is likely to accomplish little.  Thank you.  -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 02:39, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  To the anonymous editor from Minnesota 
Talk:KOKC (AM)

message: This article needs to be merged with KOKC-AM.  It doesn't really make too much sense to have two articles on basically the same station.  They are nearly identical, anyway, except this article has no schedule and some portions are from when this was at KOMA-AM.  --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:26, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, per WPRS there should not be an article titled KOKC-AM, just KOKC (AM) with a disambiguation page at KOKC. - Dravecky 05:57, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: There was no time when the FCC moved all AM radio stations 40 kHz up. In 1941, stations were moved up anywhere from 10 to 40 kHz (with some of the lowest-frequencies not changed at all) to accommodate frequencies that were reserved for Canada and Mexico. The statement that this station moved up in the 30s seems unlikely; it would appear that both the phrases "during this time" (meaning 1932) and "all AM radio stations" are incorrect. -- BRG (talk) 17:51, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Frequency change
Talk:KOKC (AM)/Other version

message: This article needs to be merged with KOKC (AM).  It doesn't really make too much sense to have two articles on basically the same station.  They are nearly identical, anyway, except that this article has a schedule and the other article doesn't, and some portions of the KOKC (AM) article are from when it was at KOMA-AM.  --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Ron Bass (wrestler)

message: From the picture that is posted at WWE.com under their "Where are they Now" series, he kinda looks like the guy from the beginning sequences of Ace Venture Pet Detective. Can we get clarification in that so maybe it could be added to the profile? Tazz 15:09, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ace Ventura

message: I could have sworn he disappeared from the WWF in late 1989 or early 1990, but his page claims his last appearance was at the 1989 Royal Rumble but i know for sure he was in the 1989 Survivor Series and could have sworn i saw him in an episode of Saturday Night's Main Event in January of the following year which might of been taped a month or two earlier, but i can't confirm it because not many SNME episodes are available. Ultron5000 (talk) 12:30, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  When he left 

message: Ron Heard has 3 children 2 sons and 1 daughter. i know this as fact as i was his sister in law for 22 years.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marie1957 (talk • contribs) 14:37, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  children 
Talk:Dominique Moceanu

message: In the header 2000-2007, it states that Dominique is currently a student. Is this still the case now that she is married and now with baby? Shawn W (talk) 00:12, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to this interview, yes.  It says that she's taking one semester off to be with her daughter, but expects to return and graduate by spring 2009. DanielEng (talk) 03:55, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Currently a Student? 

message: How is the comeback progressing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.82.57.163 (talk) 20:14, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comeback? 

message: Why is it listed that her husband is a podiatrist, but then goes on to say a podiatrist is not a real doctor. A podiatrist is, in fact, a doctor who works on feet and ankles. Also an odd addition in the Personal Life section, the article says she has a sister that was born "without a soul." These fairly dumb additions that are not based on fact, or they are typos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.12.101.28 (talk) 03:03, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd additions 

message: Hollywood, California or Florida? This edit has brought this to my attention. The sources brought forth in that edit were not reliable, however, so I reverted. Yet I recall back at the time she and the rest of the Magnificent Seven gymnasts were getting attention following the 1996 Olympics about seeing either as her birthplace. At least one of them is obviously not true. What is currently in the article (California) seems to be the correct one, after verifying in the first few pages of her 1996 autobiography (this book), which I happened to buy not long after the 1996 Olympics. So I'd stick with California, unless another reliable source says otherwise - which at that point, we may have a dispute about this detail. MPFitz1968 (talk) 00:04, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace dispute? 

message: (talk) 01:56, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  XLinkBot revert
Talk:Don Wilson (kickboxer)

message: I am a new wikipedian: The following external link leads to a real estate inspection ad rather than to Don Wilson's official website:
*Don "The Dragon" Wilson New(2008)up-to-date official site
What is the proper way to remove this link?
Paul Maslak (talk) 04:00, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: External Link is bad

message: Sorry I didn't source. Never gotten the hang of that..
Here is Black Belt Magazine's June 1989 issue, page 24, it mentions the STAR quote: https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=29cDAAAAMBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false
Also here is STAR's Don Wilson profile, where his record is kept alongside his titles and awards: http://www.starsystemkickboxing.net/Pages/DonWilson.aspx
Surely official sources such as these are enough to validate the fact that he HAS been called the greatest kickboxer by them.
187.142.225.40 (talk) 21:16, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Greatest Kickboxer of all time
Talk:Don Airey

message: I've uploaded my own photo of Don to replace the copyrighted low resolution one. Nsoveiko 06:02, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  photo 

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 22:26, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Don does not have a north-eastern accent, so when did he actually move away from Sunderland? TomGreen 20:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accent 

message: If I'm not mistaken, Don did not play on "Corridors of Power", only on the 7" re-recording of "Falling in Love with You". Jules TH 16 (talk) 12:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corridors of Power
Talk:Don Atchison

message: Hey gang, just a note to explain my editing.  As the seal on this page says, unsourced or poorly sourced material should be removed, and that's what I did toward the end of the article.  I removed the following: "At a recent electoral debate, Atchinson's views on racial and sexual equality were raised. Over his three years as mayor, his controversial decision to fire city police chief Russell Sabo, who was widely perceived as 'Aboriginal-friendly', and instated himself as the police commissioner".
First of all, as a sentence, it simply doesn't make sense, particularly the sentence starting with "Over three years..." it starts a thought and never finishes it, and is sloppy writing.  Also this "fact" is unsourced, and very much opinion.  Until someone has verifiable documentation backing up these claims, they don't belong here.  
Thanks, Aylwinatrix, Feb 4, 07
:Agreed.  There has been a lot of ad hominem  attacks surrounding Don Atchison lately (especially the poster during the last election).  I think, for that reason, that this article should be treated with due scepticism. --bladebot 20:33, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's obvious that the last few edits, as well as ones in the past, have been written in a way to cast Atchison in a negative light.  It's written as if he is personally responsible for the rising crime rate, burgeoning public debt and cost overruns at River Landing. This whole article needs a rewrite to be more balanced. --Drm310 (talk) 15:30, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|Biographies of living persons]]
Talk:Don Buchla

message: See Talk:Buchla and Associates JASpencer 18:11, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: The article currently says
:Buchla created the Buchla Series 500, the first digitally controlled analog synthesizer, in 1971. Shortly after, the Buchla Series 300 was released, which combined the Series 200 with microprocessors.  The Music Easel, a small, portable, all-in-one synthesizer was released in 1972.
Unfortunately, this implies that the 300 came somewhere in the 1971-1972 range, which is far from correct. The 300 was sold specifically as an S-100 bus microcomputer with interfaces for controlling 200-series modules, and as the S-100 bus article explains, the antecedent Altair bus wasn't used by third parties until 1975 and the "S-100" name wasn't coined until late 1976.
And the Series 500, while technically capable of "digital control," was really designed for what we'd call "discrete control" these days, with limited support for configuration, timing, and start/stop signals, not the kind of computer-driven synthesis that the 300/200 combination delivered. If you look at it, you'll see that all the synthesis in the 500 is still traditional analog in nature.
I'd be really happy if a subject-matter expert with access to original documents, etc. would take this article under his or her wing and improve this text. 76.22.118.146 (talk) 06:27, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading text 

message: How is "Buchla" pronounced? Like "Buck-luh", "Boo-kluh" or something else entirely? TJRC (talk) 01:17, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The way I've heard his name pronounced commonly is 'Boo-kluh'. Refer to the documentary 'Bright Sparks' for more info. THX1136 (talk) 23:37, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation?
Talk:Don Burke

message: Please Change: on 26 Januarty 2010
To: on 26 January 2010
Nattybyrne (talk) 13:10, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Nattybyrne, 14 April 2010 

message: Mr Burke thinks he may have Asperger syndrome 
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-11-28/don-burkes-claim-of-undiagnosed-aspergers-angers-advocates/9199614
But could he have missed and is actually a narcissistic personality disorder?
Gogo dodo (talk) 23:49, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The Asperger syndrome self diagnosis is already included in the article and we don't speculate without the backup of reliable sources, especially on the topic of mental illnesses disorders. Please note article talk pages are not a forum. -- Longhair\talk 23:53, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

text: Point taken. My apologies. Again, without a reference, it's just speculation. -- Longhair\talk 00:04, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  self diagnosed
Talk:Ian Hecox

message: This page was just created. You can see the rationale for making this page here. More info will be added soon. JayKeaton 19:35, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article needs to be more encyclopedic. It says, for example, "He starred along side Anthony in the hugely popular video Pokemon Theme Music Video." "hugely" should be taken out because it is an opinion. It also should say the university he goes to and talk less about his personal life. CRouleau 02:55, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Created

message: ...is telling people to come here and write Ian's biography, despite knowing nothing about him besides his videos. Y'all should lock this page until someone more official tries to make an edit.
Just food for thought Baconalacarte (talk) 12:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Smosh Subreddit 

message: Ian Hecox is notable because he meets WP:BASIC, WP:ENT and WP:CREATIVE. I helped rewrite most of the page to focus more on Ian's life and individual contributions to Smosh, adding more biographical details on him while trimming info that could belong to the parent article itself. One thing I anticipate is that editors will inevitably cite NOTINHERITED or BIO1E as an argument for why he isn't notable outside of Smosh. While he owes much of his notability to Smosh, I believe a distinction should be made here. The "not inherited" argument was made to prevent topics which never received any significant coverage from obtaining their own article solely based on its relation to a notable topic. 
Although a large part of his notoriety does tie into Smosh, the difference here is he still has received significant coverage of his life and career, as proven with the Bleeding Cool, Daily Dot, Sactown Mag, Buzzfeed News and SN&R sources. They discuss his background and life before he formed Smosh along with his significant roles in Smosh itself and his other ventures. Also, per the Basic criteria, "the notability guideline doesn't require that the subject is the main topic of the source material, only that it's more than a trivial mention."
Finally, a strong argument can be made that he meets the second clause of ENT as a person who has "made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment" per Smosh, and meets the first clause through his appearances in films such as Ghostmates, The Angry Birds Movie and Smosh: The Movie. Overall, I think it should be just enough for him to merit an article once and for all. Thanks, PantheonRadiance (talk) 03:10, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability of Ian Hecox