Talk:Richard Scruggs

message: I'm not trying to offend anyone, but I read this article today and found the ending of it incomprehensible. I researched Scruggs' criminal problems and learned that not only was our article unreadable, it was also factually inaccurate. So, I re-did the ending. It now is chronologically correct and gives a thumbnail sketch of what actually happened, without the extraneous material on issues that aren't really related to this kind of article. And the ending now has citations. If you want to add information, please make certain you include citations to credible sources. And keep the article in encyclopedia/Wikipedia form. Scruggs might be a convicted felon, but this is still an article about a Living Person. Doctorfun (talk) 06:05, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: LATEST CHANGES TO THIS ARTICLE

message: The article now contains information on Scruggs' indictment, as well as the Ritalin litigation, tobacco litigation, and asbestos litigation.  If you think that something in the article is presented in a non-NPOV manner, can you please specify the non-NPOV content?  If you think the article is non-NPOV because something is missing, can you say what you would like to see included?  Otherwise, if no one objects than I think the neutrality-dispute tag should be removed from the article. - Walkiped (T | C) 23:38, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is the neutrality of this article still disputed?

message: "[...] documents were improperly sent to Hood's office" - this is a non sequitur. Did something get chopped somewhere along the line? Facetious Nickname (talk) 00:10, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Hood? 

message: Th Backstory section has some inflammatory language that is aimed at trial lawyers in general, and is unsourced. Added POV banner to section and pointed out areas needing citations. Sctechlaw (talk) 03:34, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Section "Backstory" and POV

message: The first two paragraphs of the "Backstory" section are lifted verbatim, without any quotation marks, from a story on Scruggs in the May 19, 2008 issue of the New Yorker (page 47). Seefoodandeatit (talk) 22:04, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Richard Scruggs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_wires/2007Nov30/0,4675,LawyerIndictedProfile,00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:50, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Richard Scruggs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://djournal.com/news/dick-scruggs-headed-back-to-prison-%EF%BF%BDsays-hes-found-new-life/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141011084324/http://oxfordeagle.com/2012/11/breaking-news-richard-dickie-scruggs-to-be-released-on-bail/ to http://oxfordeagle.com/2012/11/breaking-news-richard-dickie-scruggs-to-be-released-on-bail/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:28, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)