Talk:Kumaon Regiment

message: :Image:Kumaon Regiment insignia.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:21, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Kumaon Regiment insignia.png

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 18:31, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 13:56, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Note:  Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article  --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:43, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Kumaon Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090410115110/http://indianarmy.nic.in/arms/kumaon/history.html to http://indianarmy.nic.in/arms/kumaon/history.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:19, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There should be a section for the 1947 battle of Kashmir.  
--Patbahn (talk) 23:28, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Engagements 

message: , I think the recent changes by  were constructive and did not change anything per our references. The changes were basic rewording of the existing content and did not warrant a revert(or at least a full revert). The same IP editor has also edited other Indian Army regimental pages and these edits look fine to me. Can you please explain your objections to these edits? Thanks. Adamgerber80 (talk) 18:23, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Beginning from lead section, the source nowhere says that It (Regiment) recruits Ahirs from North India exclusively, hence the specific area finds no place in the lead. Secondly, regarding "Colonels of the Regiment" section, the whole section is unsourced/uncited and in this case how can we amend the facts. Which source warrants the modification is certainly needed. The edits made by  said i.p. are certainly baseless. I hope you can understand the reason of revert. Thanks and regards.--MahenSingha (Talk)  20:25, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  , Fair enough. Thanks for the clarification. Adamgerber80 (talk) 22:20, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert of recent edits 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Kumaon Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140219232556/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/LAND-FORCES/Units/Infantry/111-Kumaon-Regt.html to http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/LAND-FORCES/Units/Infantry/111-Kumaon-Regt.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101231100437/http://www.euttaranchal.com/education/institutes/kumaon_regiment.php to http://www.euttaranchal.com/education/institutes/kumaon_regiment.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140219232556/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/LAND-FORCES/Units/Infantry/111-Kumaon-Regt.html to http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/LAND-FORCES/Units/Infantry/111-Kumaon-Regt.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:18, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This section's content is entirely unsourced, but I'm not exactly willing to simply remove the section, as there are a few sources that can be used, such as []. These may be POV, but it's better than not having a source at all. If someone else were to rewrite the description per these sources, it would be a great help. Solamian (talk) 19:06, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Mr. Solamian. I have now added all the relevant sources particularly the DO number of the Letter from the commander. I also took the opportunity to update the developments subsequent to 1986. 116.87.142.125 (talk) 05:25, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Walong 

message: Hi, I’ve been going through the article and thought to mention here that the section “Ethnicity of Troops” was very poorly sourced and, upon opening the references, none of them clearly gave any statistics for the same. Also, additionally, the Indian Army says that it’s totally against this caste proportion, and has also dropped naming new regiments after castes. So, I guess, as far as some ground strong references are not added, we can agree to remove that section from here. Shresthsingh71 (talk) 13:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The section Ethnicity of troops needs to be removed because of it’s disputed status 

message: credible sources and references provided. 223.233.65.21 (talk) 04:23, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Content with credible independent, various news sources are being removed as "Vandalism". Preservation of information is necessary to enrich wikipedia article. No court order exists and no defamation is caused with factual truthful content. 223.233.79.240 (talk) 21:10, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert edits where information is getting deleted