lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Heloise (disambiguation)

message: Yikes!  There are two Heloises of note.  The article deals mostly with the eleventh-century correspondent.  I just added a paragraph about the twentieth-century columnist/author.  Normally, confusing the two would be difficult, but seeing the 11th-century Heloise appear as a 1951 birth is a bit disconcerting.  Any thoughts on how we could split this into two articles, and what they might be called?  Ventura 23:12, 2004 Oct 6 (UTC)
Twelfth century (1100 = 12th c.) 
StarTigerJLN (talk) 01:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I adjusted the disambiguation to work more like Abelard's redirect to Peter Abelard with a reference back to the [[Abelard (disambiguation)]. The disambiguation page for Heloise is important, but had unnecessarily been named "Heloise" to default as a primary article rather than a disambiguation. As other articles about women named Heloise are not solely titled "Heloise" but "Heloise (columnist)" or "Heloise (surname)", there is no need for the Heloise disambiguation page to be the bearer of the redirect from "Heloise". To aid scholarship, I renamed the disambigation page "Heloise (disambiguation)" and redirected Heloise to Héloïse. The diacritics are not universally used in scholarship and a redirect is necessary to "Heloise" if the surname D'Argenteuil is dropped. StarTigerJLN (talk) 01:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: There is consensus that Héloïse is the primary topic of "Heloise", so this page should be moved to (disambiguation). Note: this move does not imply any consensus to move Héloïse.   (t · c) buidhe 22:03, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Heloise →  – Heloise the scholar should have her own page without diacritics. Her disambiguation page should resemble Abelard to Peter Abelard's redirect and reference back to the disambig. She is a prominent 12th century philosopher and writer and the current setup inhibits scholarship. It's somehat disturbing that a prominent thinker's name redirects to a page mostly trying to sort her out from a household hints provider. StarTigerJLN (talk) 21:03, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: See Talk:Héloïse#Requested move 7 February 2021 for alternative to redirect HeloiseHéloïse if this request is granted. P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 00:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

text: *Gentle reminder that move requests run for at least seven days. Since there has been some objection, this request should stay open for now. P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 00:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 7 February 2021
Talk:Charles Follen McKim

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Charles Follen McKim by Frances Benjamin Johnston.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for August 24, 2020. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2020-08-24. Any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be made before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:23, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Charles Follen McKim by Frances Benjamin Johnston.jpg]] scheduled for POTD
Talk:Flogsta

message: In what year did the Flogsta Scream start? 
How long is the time duration of the average Flogsta Scream?
Does seasonal night length affect the duration of the Flogsta Scream, and if so, how?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.101.104.17 (talk) 06:57, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  History and statistics
Talk:Orbit equation

message: Angular momentum is conserved. I fail to see how l, which is defined to be the angular momentum (specific or not), can possibly be a function of theta.  But, there it is, plain as day... --2601:8:A200:5DC:654F:9CAF:C091:1180 (talk) 10:16, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Central inverse-square law force incorrect equations? 

message: The equation given in this article seems to deal exclusively with orbits in two dimensions, which is all well and good in basic theory, but in astrodynamics an orbiting body moves in three physical dimensions.  Is there an all-encompassing equation which can be graphed to show an orbital path in three dimensions?  If so, what is it?  Should it be added to this article?
AlmightyFjord (talk) 20:46, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This equation describes a two-body situation, and all two-body situations are planar. The 3D solution simply places the plane of the ecliptic within 3-space. Darekun (talk) 09:54, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Given any two bodies, we can define a 2-D coordinate system.  The orientation of the plane of an orbit with respect to another arbitrary plane is, well, arbitrary.  Isaac Newton proved that in a two-body system all orbits stay within a single constant plane.  You dont have to consider a third dimension unless you want to talk about things outside of the orbital plane. And yes, whereas real orbits are far more complicated than that, subject to perturbations and do in fact change in all 3 dimensions over the course of eons, its insignificant in the short term and no one has ever solved the n-body problem anyway, so there is no help anyone can provide. --2601:8:A200:5DC:654F:9CAF:C091:1180 (talk) 10:13, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three-dimensional orbit equation? 

message: This is to oppose the recent merge proposal: discussion is offered here. Terry0051 (talk) 00:04, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal opposed
Talk:Safe operating area

message: Shouldn't this page be renamed to "Safe operating area" (with o and a in lowercase)? It is used that way in the article itself. --Pt 00:14, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It can be used both ways. Capitalized if it's used as a spelled-out acronym or proper noun, as in the article title, and uncapitalized if it's used in a descriptive way for the "operating area that is safe". The bolded words are some gray area though. Rather than to uncapitalize the title I'd be inclined to capitalize them instead. OR WE COULD AVOID THE ISSUE ALTOGETHER LIKE SOME DATASHEETS DO AND PRINT THE WHOLE THING IN ALL CAPS... Femto 13:54, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Duran Duran (1983 video)

message: Nice work, Feduciary!  You've done a great job expanding my measly stub.  Sorry to remove your name from the text -- that's not standard practice at Wikipedia, but your contributions are easily visible on the article's "history" page, so your credit remains intact.  Look forward to more collaboration on other articles.  Catherine | talk 00:18, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Deviant behavior

message: * Information on more theorists.
* Cleaning up, adding more information on the discourse on the functions of deviance.
* For the "types of deviance" section, there is information from the Social Deviance Wikibook.
* Possibly shortening the description of theories in the three schools in order to streamline the article, so that people can get a general sense and then study further by clicking on links. Boneheadmx 08:56, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To do

message: I disagree with the listing of several subcultures as deviant. Deviance requires violation of cultural norms; however, in a subculture there's a conformity to a smaller culture but a culture nevertheless, hence I don't see why it would be categorized as such. Sarge Baldy 00:18, Oct 7, 2004 (UTC)
I'm confused why labelling deviancy:
"Encourages social change"
Don't you mean discourages social change?
Johnflux 22:11, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Subcultures really deviant?

message: Should this page be merged with Sociology of deviance?--ColdFeet 07:46, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I'm not sure why the above text has been crossed out, but I agree that this should be merged with sociology of deviance.--(unsigned)
Note made later by another user: all the "crossing out" was because of a (probably misplaced) unclosed tag which I turned off. --starfarmer 02:09, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: At the end of the last paragraph of the first section it says:
The Italian School is a criminological school that studies the biological factors which may contribute to crime and deviance. Syafriwaldi, Criminology
I looked up "Syafriwaldi" on Google and didn't come up with anything that made sense; I had assumed that it was a reference that hadn't been properly bracketed.
Anyone got a clue on this? If not, we should probably delete it.
--starfarmer 02:09, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning not clear...typo? 

message: This article and Sociology of deviance substantially duplicate each other. I propose that they be merged into a common article Deviance (sociology). Madcoverboy 03:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger to Deviance (sociology)
Talk:Neil Diamond

message: The article says he is "American". America has been the name of the whole continent since 1507, when Martin Waldseemuller wrote it on a map for the first time, and he wrote it over Brazil. America comprises 35 countries. Justin Bieber is American from Canada. Pope Francis is American from Argentina. Get the concept? The name of the country would be more accurate. Neil Diamond is from the United States, which is one of the 35 countries in America.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.47.183.193 (talk) 02:40, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: How weird. What would you then say is the word for someone from the United States of America? You're suggesting that a person from Canada is not a Canadian but an American? That an Argentinian is called an American? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.102.9.114 (talk) 15:49, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh give it a rest.  Diamond is American because 'Brazilian" sounds fine, "Canadian" sounds fine, "Argentinian" sounds fine, but "United Statesian" does not sound fine at all.  I was born in the US, I've lived all but one of my 63 years in the United States, and I'm American, thanks. 2600:6C5D:5A00:B1D:4080:5B12:54AD:B8B7 (talk) 01:10, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

text: And I apparently responded to the wrong comment. 2600:6C5D:5A00:B1D:4080:5B12:54AD:B8B7 (talk) 01:11, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguous Nationality 

message: I don't know how to edit the Neil Diamond article -can someone help or do it for me? Here's the edit:
Nick Fradiani, who won American Idol in 2015, succeeded Will Swenson as Neil Diamond in "A Beautiful Noise" on October 31, 2023.
Multiple sources, including Broadway News. Marlene41 (talk) 05:09, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update Neil Diamond
Talk:Psychosexual disorder

message: This page is redundant with Paraphilia.  It should be merged into that article if there's anything here worth saving.  -- Beland 01:28, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: from VfD:

message: I removed the sentence, "A classic example of such a disorder is 'O'Sullivan syndrome', in which the victim is overcome with a desire to fornicate with armed forces servicemen" as this is obviously bogus. A Internet search reveals no such syndrome. Someone obviously has inserted this in here to diss a woman with the surname O'Sullivan.Shemp Howard, Jr. (talk) 14:07, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing "O'Sullivan Syndrome"
Talk:The Way of the Tiger

message: The Way of the Tiger was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP
The co-authors of this rather obscure series of books are already on VFD (here and here), so this might as well get nominated for good measure. --DMG413 01:41, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Phantasy Star (video game)

message: Am I missing something or is this an omission? There was a Game Gear port too. Thanks.
https://www.kultboy.com/index.php?site=pic&id=5270&s=1  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:D4:9713:677A:C173:C73C:91B1:245 (talk) 15:59, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a different game, Phantasy Star Gaiden. It's mentioned on the Phantasy Star series page. TarkusABtalk/contrib 17:05, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Game Gear port mentioned at all
Talk:Giovanni Arnolfini

message: Rick, why do you insist that this be a redirect?  The article you redirect to doesn't even contain this information. anthony (see warning) 01:50, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The fact (if fact) that Giovanni de Arrigo married in 1447 doesn't mean at all he had not been married before. This seems to me a typical speculation of some modern scholars. They are always rewriting the history in order to get themselves known, probably write some book with great new ideas and earn a little money in the end. They have no other chance, do they? It's just vanity and opportunism and a bunch of semi-truthful speculation pretending to be a detailed scholarly research. Why do you believe them?
It's possible to point out that the subject could have been married previously without the overarching personal attack on all modern scholars.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.95.126.178 (talk) 19:02, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  rewriting history 

message: The text says Jacques Paviot made his discovery in 1994, but then dates his article on the subject to 1997. Is the implication that it took 3 years for him to get his findings into print (which is quite plausible, but could be made clearer), or is one of these dates an error? The Arnolfini Portrait article refers to "a chance discovery in 1997". GrindtXX (talk) 19:10, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the implication is that it took 3 years for him to get his findings into print. I've added a "published" to the painting article. Johnbod (talk) 23:40, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dating issue
Talk:Oreo

message: No idea 68.237.29.149 (talk) 22:39, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: no idea 2601:8A:4200:9B60:355E:E4A2:63C0:DC80 (talk) 00:45, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Googling for oreos halal gets a bunch of useful results. DMacks (talk) 00:48, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

text: They are kosher: https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2008/02/getting-lard-out-koshering-oreo-cookie 2607:FA49:5F02:9D00:955A:35EE:84E6:FE48 (talk) 17:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are oreos halal 

message: Parks may be on to something. Check out the fruit cupules on the oreodaphne:
thumb
They look just like Oreo biscuits. Well, the culls anyway. 2601:196:180:DC0:B8F0:5F33:A824:67EB (talk) 18:49, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parks name hypothesis  

message: I skimmed over the article rather quickly, so it might already be there, but I think that the partnership with Space Perspective is worth noting. I mean, can we all just stop and appreciate the fact that in this day and age, we can buy a box of cookies and be entered into a raffle where the prize is to literally go to near space?
- AAEexecutive (talk) 19:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Space Perspective partnership 

message: The redirect Dsrl has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  CycloneYoris talk! 21:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Dsrl]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect DSRL has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  CycloneYoris talk! 21:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:DSRL]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: In the list of limited edition Oreo flavors, I wanted to add "Oreo Trio": a Mexico-exclusive variant consisting on two halves, one chocolate, one golden with a strawberry filling. Provided are two pictures uploaded back in 2010 which show the oreos in question:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jenniferjpan/4626529661/in/photostream/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jenniferjpan/4627135750/in/photostream/ BlackBolt97 (talk) 01:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Flickr is user-generated content, and the photos don't verify these details (exclusive to Mexico, flavors, etc). These photos are also copyrighted and can't be used on Wikipedia. Jamedeus (talk) 01:25, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 April 2024 (Adding LE flavor to list)
Talk:Primate of All Ireland

message: Should Archbishop of Armagh really redirect here?  Shouldn't it be the other way around?  Isn't this rather like having King of England redirect to Defender of the Faith? john k 03:22, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Actually, the two things should be quite separate. Curiously, I see that the CoI has a distinct Archbishop article now, and the RCC does not... The "day job" is Archbishop of Armagh, the superior titular role of Primate coming into play on limited occasions. Mind you, the roles are more tightly combined, and more notable perhaps, in the CoI, where the Archbishop of Armagh / Primate of All-Ireland is distinct from all other bishops, notably having a unique form of election. And then there is the question of perhaps merging this article with the Primate of Ireland one, which actually contains more on the disputes between the two (whereas the Diocesan History currently listed as covering same has little to say on the matter, with more on other disputes between Dublin and Armagh). 195.96.72.22 (talk) 10:26, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name?

message: I am proposing to merge this article and Primate of Ireland.  I have opened a discussion at Talk:Primate of Ireland#Proposed merge.  Scolaire (talk) 21:32, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge
Talk:Reciprocity

message: Does someone know how to pronounce this word? Even some native speakers don't know. Is it pronounced Reessiprokity? Or Rekiprossity? Rekiprokity? Reessiprossity? Or maybe even something else??? -- 79.238.164.100 (talk) 20:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought I had already looked it up in the dictionary without finding it, but I was wrong. I had not looked it up, it is there and it is pronounced reessiprokity. -- 79.238.164.100 (talk) 20:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not right.  The pronounciation is given as "s" in OED, Collins and American Heritage dictionaries.  Are you looking in an English dictionary? SpinningSpark 14:41, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronounciation
Talk:RT-23 Molodets

message: content is from this site.  i do not think we have permission to use this.  could not find any not on useage other than "all right reserved."  putting up for speedy. Cavebear42 05:27, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Permission

message: The appropriate infobox is  -MBK004 06:59, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox?

message: The article states that 36 of RT-23 was silo-based and 56 railbased but in links the numbers are shifted: 36 on railcars and 56 silo based...What is more -I do remember that previous versions of that article also stated numbers as such.....
193.25.0.13 (talk) 13:49, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shifted numbers 

message: i know , we know those stuff, RT15 25 are from RT2\M\P for srbm mr ir ranges , there was projects for RT-22 26 other twenty class
rt mean raket tvjordytoplivo , solidpropellant rocket , RT-25 is correct ?! i think need to be checked
i can advice militarytomsk , russianspaceweb astronautix , have other two three good info sites ik .
--Zafer14ur8 (talk) 19:30, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  RT-25 RT-15 error oder confusion
Talk:Yasui house

message: i believ Yasui refers to a city in Iran called "yasuj". this city is not the capital of the Chahr Mahaal and Bakhtiari province, but the capital of the neighbouring province of Koh-ge-louyeh va boyer ahmad.
the capital of Chahr Mahaal and Bakhtiari province is called Shahre-Kord which is corruption of the word "deh-kordeh" which means " village where shoes are made" (This comment was NOT by me, but moved here from the main article Gerritholl 07:33, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Momus

message: What's with the "retirement" and "shot glasses" and "taxes" parts of the introduction?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.247.153.23 (talk) 16:48, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: As proposed by Heiko_A, I think that the article Momos should be absorbed into this one, and Momos to redirect here.   I started a disscussion on the Momos talk page.   Would appreciate any input. --VonWoland 00:40, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger of Momos

message: According to "Der Olymp, oder Mythologie der Aegypter, Griechen und Römer" by Prof. A.H. Petiscus (Berlin 1832, 5th Edition), Momos is the son of Morpheus. Sadly, he doesn't mention any sources. 93.215.35.144 (talk) 15:11, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parents 

message: The policy of allowing the transfer of articles from the out of copyright 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica was always a mistake, particularly in the case of this article. The EB style does not fit Wikipedia's, being often opinionated and unsupported by references. The language is old-fashioned, while scholarship has moved on in the century or more since those articles were written. In the case of the article on Momus, it was a disgrace even back then, being little more than a largely unconnected list of miscellaneous facts, to which editors here have added since without attempting to draw connections between them. This will explain the reasons for reordering some of the material, while omitting more trivial mentions. As per WP:MISC, not every occurence of the name is significant. Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 09:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision 

message: I added a sentence about a writer taking "Momus or the laughing philosopher" as his(?) 1779 nom de plume in Westminster Magazine or the Pantheon of Taste, one of a plethora of literary publications of that era for which we still don't have articles. It was reverted because I had not sufficiently explained its relevance. It might belong better in the comedy section than social satire, though it's a fine line. I don't see it as any less relevant than any of the other examples. Any objections to re-adding it? --Carbon Caryatid (talk) 21:20, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, per WP:OFFTOPIC. The article is about the god, not those who assume his name. At the head of the article there are links to others who have used it. You would have to create an article about the writer, not just dump a random fact you've discovered into this one. Sweetpool50 (talk) 21:39, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Georgian laughing philosopher
Talk:Game On (British TV series)

message: What actually appears on screen has primacy, and in the case of the third series that is emphatically (all lower case) "episode one," "episode two," etc. The first run Radio Times also did not list any titles, so there is certainly no reason to suspect that what may have appeared in the TV Times was anything other than description-based speculation. I am therefore amending the page accordingly. Nick Cooper (talk) 21:04, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spurious third series episode "titles" 
Talk:Snow (Spock's Beard album)

message: Created the page- linked from The Who - Tommy. Apologies for stylistic errors, it's 11.30 am and I haven't gone to bed yet. Jelly441 10:27, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled