Talk:American popular music

message: Hi Tuf-Kat
I'd like to suggest simply one paragraph at the opening:
From its roots in West African and European folk traditions, American popular music has developed into a rich variety of styles over the last 200 years, which have had a profound effect on music across the world, particularly since the introduction of recorded music and broadcasting. These styles include ragtime, blues, jazz, rock, R & B, doo wop, gospel, soul, funk, heavy metal, punk, disco, house, techno, salsa, grunge and hip hop, and numerous, less familiar regional styles, such as zydeco, klezmer and slack-key. The genius of these styles lies in their supple, energetic rhythms, their appealing vocal lines, and in many cases their symbolic associations with the plight of the underprivileged.
Tony 05:35, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:Lead section recommends three paragraphs for an article of this size. If you really think the second paragraph should be removed, I could live with that, but the lead should be a concise summary of the rest of the article.  So I think it's important to give a broad introduction to the field. Tuf-Kat 05:58, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

text: Okay, I squished together the last two paragraphs into one, removed the second and added a slightly revised sentence -- I thought it was POV, but decided it works if "genius" is switched to "appeal". Tuf-Kat 06:21, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The first sentence doesn`t make sense..American popular music " had " influenced ... ?   It may just be a typo but if it`s not it needs to be backed up with a timeframe related to exactly when American music started and stopped being influential..this seems like an obvious mistake..the word should be changed to has shouldn`t it? 24.177.239.215 (talk) 01:20, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  new opening? 

message: "Grant would later produce CCM's first #1 pop hit ("Baby Baby"), and CCM's best-selling album (Heart In Motion)."
I remember that when "Baby Baby" came out, there was quite a stink in the CCM community. Is this really considered a CCM song? There are no lyrics that refer to anything religious. On a related note, the new additions to the article need to be sourced; this is a FA candidate, and it can't stand for just random additions at this point. BrianSmithson 11:29, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian contemporary 

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps. In reviewing the article against the Good article criteria, I have found there are some issues that need to be addressed. I am giving seven days for improvements to be made.
*The Paul Whiteman photo has no fair use rationale. 
If issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it will be delisted. If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAC. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions. Regards, T Rex | talk 23:33, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The image was removed by me, so the article keeps its GA status. T Rex | talk 18:52, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA On hold

message: Is it possible to put smaller font for references?--Vojvodaen (talk) 17:49, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Smaller font for references

message: The image :File:Because the Night - Patti Smith.ogg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --18:32, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with File:Because the Night - Patti Smith.ogg

message: The References and Notes are poorly formatted, often do not have page numbers, and are not numbered. They do not follow WP:RS and WP:CITE, as it is not possible for the reader to consult the page of the reference source to check the veracity of the citation. I can't figure out the citation method(s) being used here. The numbers that are there do not seem to match and are not in order. —Mattisse (Talk) 15:39, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References/notes need cleanup 

message: Contrary to statements introduced in several 25 October 2010 edits of the article for which this is the discussion page, Edward T. King and Eddie King are indeed one and the same person. Furthermore, King left The Victor Talking Machine Company in 1926, two years before it became RCA Victor, so he was not an "RCA Victor" A&R executive.
According to GracykGracyk, Tim with Frank Hoffman, Popular American Recording Pioneers: 1895--1925, Haworth Press, New York, 2000, pp. 153, 227--229, 299, 349., after having been with Columbia, King joined Zon-o-phone in 1905 and became Zon-o-phone's A&R manager and musical director of performances and then "began to work regularly in Victor's New York studio after Victor stopped the operation of its Zon-o-phone subsidiary in 1912."
About mid-1915, King, manager of Victor's Foreign Department at the time, hired Nathaniel Shilkret to work for him as conductor and arranger at Victor, and, in his autobiography, ShilkretShilkret, Nathaniel, ed. Shell, Niel and Barbara Shilkret, Nathaniel Shilkret: Sixty Years in the Music Business, Scarecrow Press, Lanham, Maryland, 2005, p.36, 47 and 95.  lists the Victor Talking Machine A&R committee as consisting of  Harry MacDonugh (chairman), Eddie King, Shilkret, R. P. Wielage, Porter, and Davis. Shilkret cites King as the A&R man responsible for bringing Kate Smith to Victor.
King left Victor at the end of 1926 to go back to Columbia, and his position as Victor's Director of Light Music was filled by Shilkret.Niel Shell (talk) 18:13, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Edward T. "Eddie" King

message: An image used in this article, File:Old folks at home sample.ogg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Old folks at home sample.ogg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on American popular music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110301034806/http://www.allmusic.com:80/explore/style/d2676 to http://www.allmusic.com/explore/style/d2676
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Substituted at 07:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on American popular music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.allmusic.com:80/explore/style/d2676
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050403172705/http://roughstock.com:80/history/nashsound.html to http://www.roughstock.com/history/nashsound.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:52, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article does an excellent job of treating a complex subject in a reasonable amount of space, hitting a lot of important points, and without getting bogged down in endless minutiae (like the 100 different varieties of Metal, for example...).
It also illustrates the arch-like progression of the history of popular music over the 20th century:  simple roots with a few predominant styles; innovation and new developments every 10-15 years or so; the explosion of innovation in the 1950s-1970s; and the tapering off back to a few predominant styles in recent decades.  
Might be worth mentioning something about this progression in the article.  Surely by now someone has written on the topic, so as to avoid the "original research" bugaboo?
70.89.176.249 (talk) 19:40, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article 

message: It has been proposed that American pop be merged into this article.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:51, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 10:41, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: — Assignment last updated by Isha0323 (talk) 19:31, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Black American Music