Talk:Hanyu Shuiping Kaoshi

message: See also the edit history of a duplicated article. — Instantnood 10:59, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: duplicated

message: The method shown here as the 'previous format' is still widely followed- in fact I think it's still the dominant one, at least in China itself.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.42.22.131 (talk) 11:32, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A lot of books and courses still follow the old format, but I'm pretty sure it is no longer possible to take the exams according to the old format. In case I'm mistaken I'd like to see an example of an *officially approved* exam that follows the old format.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.246.37.187 (talk) 15:07, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I just took the old format test in Feb, I am pretty sure it is still being offered for at least one more year in the mainland.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.192.148.62 (talk) 10:57, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

text: It is possible to take the HSK in the "old" format. You can find a list of available tests for 2011 if you go here: http://www.hsk.org.cn/news/news20101108_c.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.71.216.80 (talk) 15:37, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect content

message: In the article Standard Mandarin section Role of standard Mandarin it mentions a test called "Mandarin Level Evaluation Exam (普通话水平测试)".  Is that the internal version of HSK?  How might the two tests be related to each other?  As a reference point, it might be interesting to know if the internal one is more difficult than the HSK. Shenme (talk) 06:18, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is different.  HSK is geared towards non-native speakers while the 普通话水平测试(Mandarin Level Evaluation Exam) is geared towards Chinese people to prove their ability in standard mandarin (as opposed to a local dialect). -Frazzydee|✍ 03:11, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Is HSK same/different as test mentioned in [[Standard Mandarin]]?

message: I understand the "see also" links to other Chinese language tests, but don't understand the point in linking to Korean and Japanese specifically. There are at least 15 other language proficiency tests with pages on Wikipedia; maybe it would be better to just link to Wikipedia's list of language proficiency tests? Simplylala (talk) 11:55, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese & Korean links necessary?

message: :The lists that are currently on the page are very inaccurate. Look at the first few characters in level 5, for instance, and you'll see that many are duplicates from level 4. 67.246.96.28 (talk) 21:46, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Taking a closer look, it seems this is because the list on the article does not match Patphilly's spreadsheet. There are lots of discrepancies between the two. 67.246.96.28 (talk) 22:56, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The lists and character counts were completely changed a few days ago, and the claim inserted that the lists were updated in 2012. Since the edit looked plausible, I didn't go to the trouble of verifying it. – Smyth\talk 11:20, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  December 2013 

message: The wording of the paragraph below implied that the Hanban assessment must somehow necessarily be inferior to that of the Association of Chinese Teachers in German Speaking Countries. There is a difference of opinion, but the German-speaking association is not automatically correct just because it is a European, as opposed to an Asian, source. Therefore I have edited the paragraph to make the language more neutral.
Previous, non-neutral, wording: Hanban claims that the HSK's six levels correspond on a one-to-one basis with the six levels of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). However, an assessment by the Association of Chinese Teachers in German Speaking Countries concluded that this was a significant overestimation of the competences  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.52.40.247 (talk) 19:00, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Equivalence to CEF 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hanyu Shuiping Kaoshi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150512011944/http://www.studyhsk.com/chinese-character-lists-new-hsk-level to http://www.studyhsk.com/chinese-character-lists-new-hsk-level
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:19, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:37, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion