Talk:Royal Observer Corps

message: I am extending the History section about the Corps - I hope that this doesn't cause any conflict with others plans.  Please make contact with me here.  John Saltmarsh 09:43, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no plans to extend it, go ahead. I have an interest in ROC underground posts, so created a stub, but no extensive knowledge of the Corps. -- Rwendland 10:15, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

message: :Image:ROCcrest2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Rationale added to image article. Johnmc (talk) 06:29, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:ROCcrest2.jpg

message: My personal copy of Derek Woods' Attack Warning Red history of the ROC is buried in my garage during home renovations. As soon as I get a chance I will dig it out and complete this article with its references.21stCenturyGreenstuff (talk) 01:05, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Now that the build is almost complete, all that is missing is a section on the various Commandants that cannote be done until all the individual articles have been completed, it is pretty obvious that the ROC article is now simply too big. I plan to split it down into a number of separate stand alone articles with links and precis on the main page. It will go into the diary as a job in progress 21stCenturyGreenstuff (talk) 02:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Split the article

message: Having attended the Corps' 60th Anniversary Royal Garden Party at RAF Bentley Priory in what I seem to recall was 1985, why is the inception date stated as being 1929? (See ROCA web site for confirmation). Endrick Shellycoat 20:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes and a lovely day it was too....except for the official photographer corps having scooted round the corner too quickly and all of them missing a snap of me being introduced to and chatting with HMQ...same thing happened in 1991 as well....don't suppose I will ever get another chance now. As regards the inception date I have always been something of a purist and preferred 1929 when the corps was taken up by the RAF, the first Air Commodore was appointed Commandant and HQROC was first established at RAF Uxbridge...but I am happy to go with the flow and accept 1925...feel free to change them all back, not a problem. Good work on the article by the way, especially the infobox...how confident would you be at trying to add a pole, crown and tassle to the banner pnx? 21stCenturyGreenstuff (talk) 20:53, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see your point and would be inclined to agree, if it were not for the liklihood of generating some confusion on the part of readers who, like me, understood 1925 to be when the clock started ticking. As you've no objection, I'll change it to 1925, thanks. I was due to be presented to the D of E, however he chose instead to engage the rather attractive Observer (W) standing next to me in conversation. Can't think why he chose to speak to her instead of me... ;) Regards, Endrick Shellycoat 22:38, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well that is just stunning, what a talent. I have just upped your ROC ensign to RAF Bentley Priory and alongside the RAF ensign the colours are different....but from my memory of putting up and taking down the ensign each day I reckon your colour blue is the most accurate of the two. 21stCenturyGreenstuff (talk) 18:49, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.171.118.80 (talk) 12:23, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  If Wes Anderson doesn't use some of this in his next film, he's really missing out. – AndyFielding (talk) 10:54, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Inception date

message: This article is capable of GA or FA Classificiation, if references and in-line citations are added. Can somebody with access to these add them please, as it is a waste of an excellent article to be stuck at Start class. (I have down-greaded it from B-class due to the lack of referencing.Petebutt (talk) 17:44, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification

message: An image used in this article, File:Royal Observer Corps Ensign.PNG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011 
;What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:06, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Royal Observer Corps Ensign.PNG Nominated for Deletion

message: An image used in this article, File:Royal Observer Corps Stable Belt.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:09, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Royal Observer Corps Stable Belt.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Royal Observer Corps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091004223804/http://www.truroroca.co.uk/newsletter.htm to http://www.truroroca.co.uk/newsletter.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:55, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I've improved some headings to make them more encyclopedic and make them follow military terminology. If you disagree with these edits, please discuss it below as not to start an edit war (haha the irony).
Cheers! Double Plus Ungood (talk) 03:21, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikified Headings 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:20, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:48, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion