Talk:Naveen Jain

message: I have removed these details from the lead again. The listing of professions and activities in the lead section should focus on the topic's main professions and activities, and reflect the coverage and weight of details in the article's main body (omitting occasional and secondary activities). With the current minimal coverage of these aspects in the main text it is clear that these details are not noteworthy enough to be included in the lead for now (see MOS:LEAD). GermanJoe (talk) 14:21, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Philanthropy generally is not "one and done" activity so excluding that is opposite of the value of an article about a person? You, Ronz, and others act like adding more, verifiable, TRUE information is the end of the world. Why? What does it personally harm any of you to add these verifiable details about this person? You shout, UNDUE, SOAP, COI, and so many other slurs to scare of or block other editors. Articles in sources like The New York Times, meanwhile, are blatantly ignored! Just what is the COI going on here, and what miracle of press would it take to convince biased COI editors of the truth? Finally, in regards to the Seattle Times source (used almost exclusively???) that is a regional publication. Unless that material was syndicated by the AP (it wasn't) then you're taking regional details and exploding them out to global proportions WHILE ignoring the actual global activities like Moon Express. You should be ashamed of yourselves. It's well past time to shine the light on these activities! Mike in il (talk) 15:34, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read WP:AGF and WP:NPA (unproven personal allegations are a form of personal attack on Wikipedia), and comment on content not on other contributors. For the record: I rarely edit this article, and am not connected to the topic in any way or form (neither pro- or anti-Jain). Content-related disagreements happen all the time as part of the collaborative process on Wikipedia. Such criticisms are not "slurs" or some kind of conspiracy against the topic or disagreeing editors. Also, WP:NPOV (including the referenced "undue weight" aspect) is one of Wikipedia's core policies - this policy is not negotiable, and any content violating it should be removed or improved. Regarding your concern about coverage: notable related sub-topics like Moon Express have separate main articles. Information about such related topics should only be covered in succinct summary style here. Additional detailed information about the company and its activities should be placed in the linked main article (to avoid redundancy and content forks). GermanJoe (talk) 16:51, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inventor and philanthropist 

message: I'm not finding past discussions.I'm unaware of problems using TechCrunch as a source. I believe there are many more sources available to use. Let's see what we can find: --Ronz (talk) 19:31, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Found a past discussion: Talk:Naveen_Jain/Archive_2#Intelius_settlement --Ronz (talk) 20:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

text: RSN discussion that didn't get much response: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_87#techcrunch.com --Ronz (talk) 21:21, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

text: As far as problems with using TechCrunch, the recent discussions highlight their use of press releases, problems reporting where they have a conflict of interest, and inconsistent quality: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_221#Are_news_articles_written_by_TechCrunch_staff_considered_RS? --Ronz (talk) 21:30, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Intelius consumer complaints

message: Re: . Give the discussions above, I think that this latest bit of edit-warring is disruptive. I've left an discretionary sanctions alert and think that Arbitration Enforcement is the next line of dispute resolution for this situation, regardless of whether or not there is paid editing involved this time around. --Ronz (talk) 14:38, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latest attempt to remove aspects of notability from this article