lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Scottish Westminster constituencies (style 1)

message: I am trying to build a series of articles listing and describing Scottish Westminster constituencies for different periods from 1708 to the present, but I am finding this template difficult to relate to. I have already moved List of UK Parliamentary constituencies in Scotland to Scottish Westminster constituencies from 2005, which now includes links and protolinks for other articles in the series.
I was thinking of moving the template to Template:Scottish Westminster constituencies from 2005, but because it lists constituencies by party it will not fit that location indefinitely. An election will change the pattern and the template will not cover the entirety of the "current period" (which will end when results of the 6th Periodical Review are implemented). Besides, I am otherwise not happy with that way of listing constituencies, not least because for anyone looking for a link for a particular constituency it presumes prior knowledge of political condition.
Laurel Bush 14:32, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move template? 

message: Life might be simpler in the long run if I work Template: Scottish Westminster constituencies into this one, putting content of this one effectively into a section called Current constituencies. Laurel Bush 11:42, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work in [[Template: Scottish Westminster constituencies]]? 

message: ::OK, I have done a few drafts: see
::*User:BrownHairedGirl/Scots 1983-1997
::*User:BrownHairedGirl/Scots 1997-2005
::*User:BrownHairedGirl/Scots 2005-present
::I have made a test age to demonstrate how they would look : see User:BrownHairedGirl/Aberdeen_North_constituency#Footnotes
::What do you think? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you use the "show" button which expands the boxes? Then you'll see the lists of constituencies, inside the box. I will put one below this comment, and since it'll be the only one on the page it should be expanded when the page loads.--BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:19, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Plus another draft: User:BrownHairedGirl/Scots 1708-1832. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:41, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Well, if you're happy with the layout, I can finish off the series and start deploying it (not too hard a job with AWB). What do you think of the way I have divided up the constituencies into burghs and counties?  It seemed like a good idea to split the lists, and since there is no stable geographical division, the county/burgh split seemed like the best idea. The only real downside I can see with it is that county/burgh split is less relevant in recent times. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:15, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draft of separate constituency boxes 

message: What happened to the template that seperated the seats into parties, that was much better? Talk!!</small></sup> 15:11, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old template
Talk:Sugar Baby (song)

message: http://www.folkways.si.edu/TrackDetails.aspx?itemid=1899
Sugar Baby
Track Artist Paul Clayton
Genre(s) Ballads; Folk songs--United States; Folksong revival
Instrument(s) Appalachian dulcimer; Guitar
Someone might like to mention this version as well? 
EDLIS Café  12:31, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paul Clayton
Talk:Sweet Betsy from Pike

message: Don't forget about Jimmy Driftwood's version, one that sounds about as real American as you can get.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.152.235.216 (talk) 20:13, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aosDwhwOSLE ?  --213.225.34.180 (talk) 17:06, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about 

message: The tune of 'Sweet Betsy from Pike' comes from the hit comedy song published in London in 1853, Villikins and his Dinah.  This parodies an existing English street ballad, William and Diana, the lyrics of which were certainly in circulation in the UK by 1842 and perhaps earlier.  (See http://ballads.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/search/?query=william+and+diana) 
What no-one seems able to say is where the influential tune came from.  Was it the original melody of William and Diana but with the comedy singalong chorus added from another source?  Apparently versions of the original non-comedy ballad William and Diana were still being collected in England in the early 19th c.  You'd think somebody who could read music could check what the tune was it was being sung to. If it was the same as Villikins then that makes a good case for the tune being an early 19th c original.  And unfortunately anonymous. ~~ RLamb (talk) 14:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of tune?
Talk:Hough Green

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Infobox to be added (use Template:Infobox UK place.)
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.) 
Snowy 1973 14:42, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 

message: Unless there is some compelling reason, yet to be made clear in any of its content, this article should surely be merged in with Widnes. It shows no sign of being in any way Notable in its own right. Comments?  DDStretch  (talk) 00:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm happy for this merger to take place. Sometimes suburbs and small localities benefit from their own articles (Sholver and Greenacres - both written by myself - come to mind). I don't think this is one of them. -- Jza84 · (talk) 00:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: Even though I live in Hough Green I am not so sure as to why this page exists, so thats why i agree with  DDStretch  (talk) and believe that it should be merged. Zak123456789  (talk) 09:50, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Pointless
Talk:Panji tales

message: I've added links to Thai and Indonesian pages. I think we should change the title to a more suitable one, maybe "Panji Cycle", as the article offers so much more than the story of the prince himself.  Matahari Pagi (talk) 05:04, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change to Proper Title 

message: I've renamed the article to Panji tales, since this is the term used in the UNESCO inscription, etc. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:31, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: 2020
Talk:Marple Aqueduct

message: The photo shows the canal viaduct in the foreground, but the viaduct in the mid-ground is much more prominent. Without looking at the caption, most viewers would think the viaduct is the aqueduct. Does anybody have a better photo? P.S. I've checked on the commons, and there isn't a more usable photo there. --VinceBowdren (talk) 11:58, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a small gallery of three images from a trip across Marple Aqueduct. Feel free to use any or all or none. Renata (talk) 20:20, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Is this mentioned anywhere? 86.5.127.74 (talk) 00:02, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legging tunnel at Romiley
Talk:Legend (disambiguation)

message: I have cleaned up this page as follows per MOS:DAB:
* Removed pipes
* Formatted links, commas, and overlinking consistently per MOS:DAB
* If an item doesn't have the exact word legend in it, it should go into the "see also" section.  So "legends," "legendarium," etc don't belong in the main part of this page, in my opinion.
* Just because something has the word legend in its name, it doesn't necessarily need to go onto this disambiguation page.  Items that are just "the legend of suchandsuch" have been removed.  For example, people wouldn't go searching for "the legend of Zelda" by just typing the word "legend." 
* Removed cleanup tag. Bry9000 (talk) 20:17, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I propose that Legends, Legende and The Legend be merged into Legend (disambiguation). According to WP:DPAGE, singular and plural forms of a word, variant spellings and terms which differ by the presence or absence of an article can be combined subject to editorial judgment. I think it is likely people looking for information on one of these four pages may not find the content they want because they may be unaware that it can be found through another disambiguation page. Merging them all together would probably be helpful. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:00, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: They can be; There's a Latin Grammy Award winning The Legends (Tejano band), so I've moved the Swedes to (Swedish band) and fixed six or seven links. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:55, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks- don't know why I didn't spot them earlier! I've added a  hatnote at the Swedish band for the moment, until we get a unified dab page for The Legends to point to. PamD 13:06, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Legend disambiguation. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  DannyS712 (talk) 06:12, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Legend disambiguation" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Does anybody know the legend of Korra Olks2580 (talk) 16:25, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does anybody know the legend of Korra
Category talk:Codes of conduct

message: This category is too broad in its inclusion. I deleted a few non-codes of conduct such as five solas and affluenza, but there are a ton more that should be excised. I can help with this via AWB, but I didn't want to do it unilaterally since it is such a large change. What sayest ye? What sort of thing belongs here and what doesn't? --Flex (talk/contribs) 14:59, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold. I might get rid of Humanitarian crisis, Jesus movement, City upon a hill, Ponzi scheme, USA PATRIOT Act, Dianetics, Eternal sin and Uniform Vehicle Code, too. None of these discuss codes of conduct.Phyesalis (talk) 05:55, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

text: You could remove WWJD because it is essentially the same as some others. Fleetflame (talk) 02:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Too broad

message: This category is too broad in its inclusion. I deleted a few non-codes of conduct such as five solas and affluenza, but there are a ton more that should be excised (e.g., Higher Power, Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy, Social Gospel, Disciple (Christianity), etc. etc.). I can help with this via AWB, but I didn't want to do it unilaterally since it is such a large change. What sayest ye? What sort of thing belongs here and what doesn't? Gray areas would include entries such as Norm (philosophy), Pledge of Allegiance, Blue Laws, etc. --Flex (talk/contribs) 13:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold. I might get rid of Humanitarian crisis, Jesus movement, City upon a hill, Ponzi scheme, USA PATRIOT Act, Dianetics, Eternal sin and Uniform Vehicle Code, too. None of these discuss codes of conduct.Phyesalis (talk) 05:55, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

text: You could remove WWJD because it is essentially the same as some others. Fleetflame (talk) 02:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: RFC: too broad

message: Rename to :Category:Codes of conduct per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (categories)? Cander0000 (talk) 09:18, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename?
Talk:National Republican Guard (Portugal)

message: The old talk page was never moved with the article.
Now it was.--71.185.193.98 04:47, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:The Blackfly Song

message: The redirect Blackfly" (song) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 10:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Blackfly" (song)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Claude B. Hutchison

message: This article incorporates text from farmhouse.org.  FarmHouse Fraternity International, Inc. has agreed to license its contributions under the GFDL.  To verify this agreement, please contact either  or , citing Message-Id: <E1IXHcM-0008U2-61@mchenry.wikimedia.org>.  — madman bum and angel 15:04, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:D. Howard Doane

message: This article incorporates text from farmhouse.org.  FarmHouse Fraternity International, Inc. has agreed to license its contributions under the GFDL.  To verify this agreement, please contact either  or , citing Message-Id: <E1IXHcM-0008U2-61@mchenry.wikimedia.org>.  — madman bum and angel 15:04, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Robert F. Howard

message: This article incorporates text from farmhouse.org.  FarmHouse Fraternity International, Inc. has agreed to license its contributions under the GFDL.  To verify this agreement, please contact either  or , citing Message-Id: <E1IXHcM-0008U2-61@mchenry.wikimedia.org>.  — madman bum and angel 15:05, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Christopher Reich

message: I've expanded & cleaned up the article - it's only a stub, but I don't think it's a speedy. Exxolon 15:08, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the assertion of notability?  Just having written novels isn't an assertion of notability; have they been reviewed significantly? -FisherQueen (Talk) 15:24, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One of his books is number 16 on this NY Times bestseller list -  - I'll add the ref to the article. I'll see what else I can dig up. Exxolon 15:44, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  And 12 on this one . Exxolon 15:51, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:2007 PASOK leadership election

message: That reference is "dynamic", from what I've understood. It updates according to every day's news and doesn't have a direct link. I can't find an as comprehensive list of Venizelos supporters anywhere else for now. I assume there will be time to replace it later with a non-dynamic one. Keep your eyes open and change it as appropriately please. (for those who still can't locate it, it's the one in www.megatv.com that reads "Crisi sto PASOK" (translation redundant)) NikoSilver 15:19, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mega news reference 
Talk:River Somer

message: Assessed as stub and low importance for WP:WikiProject Rivers.  Needs further referencing, map and could benefit from expanding into structure as suggested at project page. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:06, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Lots about Midsomer, but what about Somer itself? Arminden (talk) 05:00, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I live in Midsomer Norton.  In my experience locals don't call it the River Somer, they call it "the brook".  I have heard a local story that that is what it was known as till Victorian cartographers from London turned up and asked locals what the river was called.  When they responded "the brook", the outsiders thought they couldn't put that on a map, so speculated that the town's name might indicate a position on the river, and named the river "Somer".  I know this is anecdotal and I can't find a reliable source, but to local people I think this would have the ring of truth.  Peteinterpol (talk) 09:51, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of name 'Somer'...?
Talk:River Huntspill

message: Assessed as stub and low importance for WP:WikiProject Rivers.  Could benefit from expanding into structure as suggested at project page. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:30, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is difficult to see how most of the structure suggested at WikiProject Rivers would be relevant in this instance, as it is essentially a reservoir. Bob1960evens (talk) 17:24, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:River Frome, Somerset

message: Assessed as stub and low importance for WP:WikiProject Rivers.  Needs further referencing and could benefit from expanding into structure as suggested at project page. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:20, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Mequinol

message: This is also referred to as MEHQ (short for Methyl Hydroquinone), so would someone mind making a redirect? I'm not familiar with how to put those together.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.36.184.52 (talk) 07:43, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Funny - I just created such a redirect, having bought a bottle of ethyl acrylate and finding this redirect missing.  Now I come here and see your comment.  Sorry it took three years....Walkerma (talk) 22:57, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect from MEHQ?
Talk:The Load-Out

message: I made some changes to the article based on what I heard and have seen on the YouTube video. Jackson Browne & Lindley sing the last verse of "The Load-Out," then Rosemary Butler sings the first verse of "Stay." After the instrumental break, David Lindley (the steel guitarist) sings the 2nd verse of "Stay," using his funny Tiny Tim voice. Finally, Browne sing the last verse of "Stay." You can see the video at   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTJ9g1pIkzM
I don't yet know how to do a proper citation, but my husband is going to help me tomorrow. As soon as I learn how to do it, I'll fix the actual article.
Bri4daz (talk) 06:31, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a frickin' "Tiny Tim voice". It's a falsetto. Just as falsetto, like many other singers have used. Like the guy in the ORIGINAL RECORDING. Bringing up a crappy novelty act from the Tonight Show is irrelevant, and I've removed it from the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.20.184.42 (talk) 07:44, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I didn’t think it was a Tiny Tim voice, but rather a Frankie Valli voice; the Four Seasons had a major hit with their version of “Stay” and Lindley’s falsetto sounds to me like Valli’s. 2600:1014:B040:8755:D529:580E:E827:35A5 (talk) 18:59, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

text: "Tiny Tim voice" ignorance of music abounds in that statement; look up "falsetto" then listen to some do-wop, geez.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elsnod (talk • contribs) 07:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Who sings what

message: singles have a box to the right with basic info of the current single and it's predecessor to the left and the successor to the left unless this is a promotional only single and causes some new conflict.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elsnod (talk • contribs) 13:47, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox missing
Talk:RAF Merryfield

message: "A road that was closed when the airfield was built was re-opened making use of part of the main runway." There is no evidence of this from the current aerial pictures. Are you sure? CS46 20:38, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Road reopened?

message: Both the articles RAF Merryfield and RNAS Merryfield talk about the same place (just different parts of its history), therefore it would seem more sensible just to have one article & redirect the other one, in the same way that RAF Lulsgate Bottom redirects to Bristol Airport.— Rod talk 18:35, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Support: If they both share the same location and reperesent the same name then it would seem sensible to merge them. Looking at the RNAS Merryfield, it wouldn't seem important enough since it is a lot shorter and conatins less infmormation. They do both have a lot in common. Jaguar (talk) 17:26, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

text: Definitely - Considering that they are about the same article. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:32, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Merger now done.— Rod talk 18:03, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Journal Citation Reports

message: Can anyone confirm that it is still available on CD-ROM? I found the contrary on the webpage.Koczy (talk) 14:53, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  JCR on CD-ROM? 
Talk:The Moonshiner

message: The lyrics transcribed are from the American version.  The Irish traditional recorded by the Clancy Brothers and others substitutes many lines, including the hook "I'm a rambler, I'm a gambler". https://genius.com/Clancy-brothers-moonshiner-lyricsGenacGenac (talk) 22:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely. The two songs are not the same melodies either. I'm working to address this now. Trumpetrep (talk) 00:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics 

message: It would be helpful to track down the origin of the Irish waltz tune that is used for "Moonshiner".Trumpetrep (talk) 08:30, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Melody
Talk:Machine Learning (journal)

message: I consider it appropriate to mention that the journal was originally published by Kluwer Academic Publishers and printed in The Netherlands.
--Luisgui (talk) 02:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I encourage you to be bold and include that information as it is certainly relevant. Currently the article talks mainly about the schism and could certainly use more information about the journal itself and its history. If you do decide to add other information, make sure to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's verifiability policy. The Academic Journals WikiProject also has resources to help. Opencooper (talk) 02:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Original publisher
Talk:Sigma Alimentos

message: The Brands-section of this article baffles me. Am i wrong, or should it all go? Greswik 15:36, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Is the brand name Nochebuena or Noche Buena? Besides that, brand name is not to be confused with either the beer Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma Brewery#Noche Buena or the feast of Nochebuena. Can this be sorted out? Peter Horn 22:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify the brand name please, etc.
Talk:Publow

message: This section needs checking with an original source; the Henry Hastings who is linked does not have the dates 1517-1570 which are given for "Earl Becher". NinetyCharacters (talk) 18:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Owners of the manor

message: I note a merge banner has been placed at Publow with Pensford and Publow. If it can be shown that the civil parish has been renamed from "Publow with Pensford" to "Publow" then I would not oppose but I find this surprising as Pensford is considerably larger than Publow.— Rod talk 15:47, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like maybe it was never formerly renamed, it is "Publow" currently and the citation for the 2011 census appears to say "Publow" but that link is dead. I will ask  who added much of the content and knows a lot about this. I expect that the rename wasn't notified inline with the statutory requirements. Crouch, Swale (talk)  11:30, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: . Crouch, Swale (talk)  12:30, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Priston

message: I prose the merger of Wilmington, Somerset into this article as Wilmington is a small hamlet which is unlikely ever to be more than a stub. Population data is by civil parish (the whole parish only has 332 people), and I am unable to find significant history or other indicators of notability for the hamlet.— Rod talk 21:11, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge This may be odd for me saying this but I do agree. A small hamlet might stay a stub forever but with no landmarks or notability a small settlement may not be worth mentioning in the wealth and might of Somerset. Jaguar (talk) 21:24, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

text: *Thank you for moving it. I did get the parish wrong.— Rod talk 15:42, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

text: *Thanks Images of England does record steps and gateposts of the former Wilington Farmhouse still exist although the building has been demolished. I still beliieve it would be best as a sub section of the Priston article.— Rod talk 16:21, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

text: *OK in the light of these comments I have removed the merge proposal - it would still be good to expand Wilmington, Somerset.— Rod talk 19:06, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal (Wilmington)