lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Foe (unit)

message: The only person to use this unit seems to be Gerry Brown, who invented it. Please, add references to works of multiple other authors where this unit is used. If they do not exist, then this is a non-notable neologism that should be deleted. Awolf002 12:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This unit is referenced in other Wikipedia articles as well, (presumably) by other users.Metsfanmax (talk) 14:28, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this notable?

message: This may seem to be a piddly request, but someone more familiar with the astronomical circles should probably clarify what is meant when the word “released” is used.  Electromagnetic radiation?  The sum kinetic energy found in the force of gases expelled outwards?  The mass of Maxwell's daemons killed in the explosion?  Et c.
— JamesEG (talk) 04:59, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: All energy converted into non mater energy, so yes, electromagnetic, kinetic, gravitational waves. The first observed gravitational merger of binary black holes (BBH) - GW150914, by LIGO, released about 5300 foes of energy in GW alone (and mostly in GW). It is equivalent of about 3 sun masses annihilating into energy! 81.6.34.246 (talk) 21:19, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release of energy
Talk:Marie-Simone Capony

message: What does this phrase mean?? Georgia guy 13:37, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Roughly translated, "oldest woman in France." There's not quite an exact English translation for the word, if I'm not mistaken. I'm assuming Mr. Young has linked it, as he intends to create a list of the progression of the oldest people in France at some point? That's why I haven't delinked it (yet). Cheers, CP 14:35, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doyenne de France
Talk:Albert Falco

message: I've embedded a (hidden) infobox for use later when the article can be expanded with translated (and cited) information from the French article. -- David Spalding (☎ ✉ ✍) 19:50, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox for later use 
Talk:1905 World Series

message: It seems a little unnecessary to mention facts such as "It was the first World Series title for the New York Giants." when this was only the second World Series ever played.  I think they can be removed.  One item worth relocating to the main article would be the switch to a best-of-seven series. (Dossett 16:43, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Firsts" in trivia section

message: "Mathewson pitched his third complete game shutout, which, in modern times, can never be duplicated." This may be true for a five game series, but in a seven game series, it is certainly possible for a pitcher to start games 1, 4, and 7, and pitch complete game shutouts in all of them (especially if there are any rain delays involved)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.10.18.77 (talk) 03:41, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Invalid editorial
Talk:1906 World Series

message: Would it be better to use the names of the teams that they had at the time of the game?  I believe the Cubs back then were known by a different name.  Pknkly (talk) 21:34, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of Historical Team Names 

message: Guess this series could be called the Windy Series.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:39FC:C60:3814:4CF8:CEC6:C787 (talk) 14:09, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name for this series
Talk:1908 World Series

message: *The 1908 World Series is significant for being the last World Championship for the Cubs through 2007. 
*The 1908 World Series is significant for being the last World Championship for the Cubs.
Aren't they saying the exact same thing? Isn't "through 2007" implied by the words "the last"? Kingturtle (talk) 01:18, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This may sound silly, but if the Cubs should happen to win the 2008 World Series, and if someone forgets to update this page, it will still be accurate if it says "through 2007 season". Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 03:53, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

text: 101 years and counting, now...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.57.11.251 (talk) 21:54, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  through 2007
Talk:Apollon (strongman)

message: According to Dr Emmanuel Legeard, the French strength sports specialist, Louis Uni was born at eight o'clock in the morning on February 21, 1862 at no. 18 on the boulevard that today bears his name (Boulevard Louis Uni in Marsillargues) in the house his father Jean-Jacques Uni had built in 1845 [Legeard, Emmanuel, La Force (2005) pp.207-208]. He was the son of Jacques and Elisabeth (née Brémond) and the grandson of 2 m 03 giant.  When contacted, the civil registrar of the commune of Marsillargues confirmed the date of birth and the facts reported by Emmanuel Legeard (city hall (phone): 0033 4 67 83 52 10).
ThalèsWasHere (talk) 10:51, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 

message: I don't think Edmond Desbonnet qualifies as an "academic", since the founder of the physical culture movement in France had apparently no academic degree, whatsoever (this reproach was often made against him by his main competitor, Navy Lieutenant Georges Hébert (1875–1957), and it was the reason why Desbonnet needed the scientific sponsoring of Dr Rouhet, M.D.) But since I haven't found any document to prove anything either way, so far, the matter remains opaque (the only thing which can be held for absolutely certain is that Desbonnet never held any academic position). Could someone please check this up?
ThalèsWasHere (talk) 10:51, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uni was a friend and protegé of academic and champion of physical education Edmond Desbonnet
Talk:1913 World Series

message: how about putting the image in the infobox. it looks rather clunky where it is now. Kingturtle (talk) 14:14, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved it to the infobox.  I hesitated to put it there because it looked like this space was used for the logo of the World Series, although I realize at this point they probably didn't have one. - Mattingly23 (talk) 14:27, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think many of those logos have been removed for copyright violations. Also, as you say, back then, I don't think there were logos. I think the image looks good in the infobox. Kingturtle (talk) 16:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  image
Talk:1915 World Series

message: Why is this listed as Start-Class? It looks good to me. Bgates3 (talk) 18:51, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I just upped it to a C. It does need more work before it could be a B. I'm noticing that a lot of these World Series articles are underrated. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:00, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can someone elaborate on each game summary to make it a little more detailed? Thank you.2601:581:8402:1EE0:BD6F:F897:1336:76B (talk) 14:13, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game by game commentary/summaries.
Talk:1918 World Series

message: The series features in the Dennie Lehane book The Given Day, where he mentions that the war also caused the series to be played first in Chicago then in Boston, but no back and forth, to keep transportation to a minimum. Not sure if this is unique, but maybe worth mentioning.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.19.101.109 (talk) 19:18, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effect of War 

message: The term Fall Classic (as in the first paragraph) is not what I would consider common parlance amongst casual fans, nor is it defined or linked earlier in the article. I am not super familiar with Wikipedia convetions, but are these valid reasons for changing the lanugage [of the final sentence of para 1]? 2601:18B:8400:1650:8483:6A74:2BD6:93D0 (talk) 05:39, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fall Classic?
Talk:Agden, Cheshire East

message: #Stub needs to be massively expanded.
#Photos need to be added.
#Infobox needs to be added. Added 15-May-2007 by DDStretch
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. (See WP:References, [[WP:V], and WP:CITE for guidance.)
 DDStretch  (talk) 19:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 

message: Manchester City mucho  mejor 37.252.178.200 (talk) 21:44, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Football siuuuuuu
Talk:1920 World Series

message: There are two mistakes in the quoted paragraph:
# Charlie Johnson should surely be Charlie Jamieson.
# "first baseman Johnson" must be Doc Johnston.
Are the mistakes in the original report? If no, they can be corrected silently (and Charlie can get his bluelink). If yes, editorial footnotes will be needed to explain the situation. Narky Blert (talk) 10:28, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Who cares?  This is a quotation: it's already cited, and amending it is dishonest.  Nyttend (talk) 11:42, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Game 5 - the ''Cleveland Times'' report
Talk:1921 World Series

message: can someone give more clarification as to why Ruth didn't play in games 6 and 7 and didn't start in game 8? Kingturtle (talk) 12:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ruth's absense 

message: User:Danfost (talk) added a comment to the article text, which was subsequently removed by a bot. So, rather then his comment becoming lost I figured that I would take the initiative to at least post what he said here on the talk page (which is probably what Danfost should have done himself, but that's a different discussion):
The Series was the first to be broadcast on radio. Announcer Thomas Cowan recreated the game over Westinghouse-owned WJZ in Newark, listening to phoned-in reports from the stadium. (Answers.com is wrong in attributing this first broadcast to sportswriter Grantland Rice—Rice announced the 1922 World Series over WJZ the following year.) Eric C. Covil, "Radio and its Impact on the Sports World," American Sportscasters Online, accessed May 6, 2007This account conflicts with the information in the box at right, which says Grantland Rice broadcast on KDKA. I don't know the answer so I'm just noting this conflict.
The bolded text is what Danfost added as a comment.
I don't know the answer either, so I'm just going to point this out. Hopefully someone will come along and correct... whatever needs to be corrected. Ohms law (talk) 22:10, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  broadcast "dispute" 
Talk:Henri de Tonti

message: To take this edit war over here - this isn't even my fight.  I was just going by the comments which explicitly state not to do this.  Italy did not exist yet.  Tonti spent his life in the service of France anyway.  Calling him "Italian" is anachronistic in the same way that calling Julius Caesar "Italian" is anachronistic.   SnowFire (talk) 03:57, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems as if the confusion is from the Kingdom of Naples calling itself the "Kingdom of Sicily" as well.  I agree he was born there, but the kingdom referred to itself as the "Kingdom of Sicily", so calling Tonti Sicilian seems valid still.  I would rather omit the nationality altogether rather than use "Italian" though, which as noted above is anachronistic - the idea of an Italian people hadn't formed yet, either, so I'm not buying the ethnic group argument.  SnowFire (talk) 18:36, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationalistic debate
Talk:Ashley, Cheshire

message: #Stub needs to be massively expanded.(See Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements for guidance.)
#Photos need to be added.
#Infobox needs to be added. (see Template:Infobox UK place/doc‎ for guidance.)
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. (See WP:References, [[WP:V], and WP:CITE for guidance.)
 DDStretch  (talk) 19:54, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report
Talk:Olivier Le Jeune

message: Various references use very similar wording, saying "he was named after Olivier Le Tardif, chief clerk of the colony" (and Father Le Jeune)...  without mentioning that Le Tardif was his former owner.
Obviously, it would be NOR to include this, without a reference.  But we should keep our eyes peeled for references.  How did this happen?  It looks like someone wanted to sanitize the Province's record of slavery...  Geo Swan (talk) 19:47, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question...
Talk:François de Laval

message: The term "hagiographic" has been used in reference to this article. It appears to be uncritical or "reverential" to the subject. Any clean-up to improve this aspect of the article would be welcome.--Stormbay (talk) 01:28, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hagiography? 

message: The act of canonization of any form does not make the person a saint, but it recognizes him or her as such.  Therefore I would change the line to 'and therefore, he is now numbered among the saints' or something like that.  I won't unilaterally make the change, if the person who wrote it disagrees. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 15:06, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  'and therefore, he is now a saint.' 

message: In the section " The Séminaire de Québec" it's written : " In 1638 he appointed the previously troublesome de Queylus as the first Superior of a new seminary in Ville-Marie." 
the year 1638 does not make sense cause François de Laval was 15 years old then. Chiloa (talk) 16:18, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty sure it's supposed to be 1668 based on related content in Gabriel Thubières de Levy de Queylus.- MrX 17:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Séminaire de Québec 

message: Does this article really call for the two separate infoboxes? They seem fairly redundant, but maybe I'm missing something.— Moriwen (talk) 17:26, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double infobox
Talk:Aston by Budworth

message: #Stub needs to be massively expanded.(See Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements for guidance.)
#Photos need to be added.
#Infobox needs to be added. (see Template:Infobox UK place/doc‎ for guidance.)
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. (See WP:References, [[WP:V], and WP:CITE for guidance.)
 DDStretch  (talk) 19:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report
Talk:Bexton

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Infobox to be added (use Template:Infobox UK place.)
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
 DDStretch  (talk) 02:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report
Talk:1936 World Series

message: "The Yankees played their first World Series without Babe Ruth and their first with Joe DiMaggio, Ruth having been released by the Yankees after the 1934 season. He retired in 1935 as a member of the Boston Braves."
It's written twice - verbatim.  Better to pick one?   Gprobins (talk) 19:42, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paragraph Duplication.
Talk:1938 World Series

message: somehow the info box on this article got skewed. Can someone figure out what went wrong? I can't see it. Kingturtle (talk) 15:31, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I took care of it. A comment was placed inbetween the double brackets following a inter-wiki link which fouled up the infobox. -NatureBoyMD (talk) 17:28, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  info box
Talk:Chelford

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#More photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
 DDStretch  (talk) 09:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 

message: I've added the infobox as best I can. Can someone check that I have the UK Parliamentary Constituency correct? It was the only bit I was not entirely satisfied with (though I might have made a mistake with other bits as well.)  DDStretch  (talk) 09:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Added Infobox
Talk:1945 World Series

message: I recall reading that somewhere.  Did someone play in this series despite having left the Navy just 10 days earlier?
*****
I wrote the above in 2012.
Virgil Trucks, who pitched in this Series, was out of the Navy for less than 2 weeks.  His Wikipedia article has:
"Because of the circumstances, the leagues waived the rule requiring players to have been on the team's roster by September 1 to qualify for post-season play."
As noted in THIS article, many players were still in the military, and the 3-4 pattern for World Series home games was still used; the 2-3-2 pattern (used in 1944 despite the war, due to all games being in the same stadium) would return in 1946. Carlm0404 (talk) 04:42, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sept. 1 eligibility waived for returning servicemen in 1945
Talk:Gawsworth

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Infobox to be added (use Template:Infobox UK place.)
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.) 
Peter I. Vardy 20:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment Report
Talk:1952 World Series

message: Dick Williams played on the Dodgers in 1952, but he did not play in the Series. Was he on the bench? Or didn't he make the post season roster? Kingturtle 20:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He wasn't on the Dodgers' roster for the Series; I don't know if he was injured, in the minors, or just left off to make room for someone else. MisfitToys 00:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dick Williams
Talk:1953 World Series

message: Dick Williams played on the Dodgers in 1953, but he did not play in the Series. Was he on the bench? Or didn't he make the post season roster? Kingturtle 20:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're confusing the '52 and '53 Series, as he did play in '53. MisfitToys 00:15, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dick Williams
Talk:1959 World Series

message: The first paragraph claims the attendance of the 5th game is a record that cannot feasibly be broken.  It then links to List of Major League Baseball records considered unbreakable.  But this record does not appear in that article. Should/did it appear there? — Eoghanacht talk 21:45, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unbreakable attendance?
Talk:Michael Stewart, Baron Stewart of Fulham

message: It is my understanding that Oxford has never offered a Final Honour School or Pass School of Philosophy, but rather a number of Joint Schools in which Philosophy may be combined with one or more subjects, or, in an earlier age, the subject was most commonly taken within the School of Literae Humaniores. However, I am willing to be told that at one time such a School did once exist, although I think it more likely that this is a mistake.--Oxonian2006 (talk) 15:44, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: BA in Philosophy

message: Very frustrating, I was already refining the link to George Brown, you don't need to do it. It's really very irritating. kthxbye  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.198.41 (talk) 19:20, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit conflict
Talk:1956 World Series

message: This claim:
:The perfect game set the record for most consecutive hitless innings in a World Series; the Brooklyn Dodgers failed to record a hit in eleven consecutive innings.
doesn't hold up to an inspection of the box score or the play-by-play of the fourth game.
96.244.5.60 (talk) 02:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Dodgers got a couple of hits, and a run, in the ninth inning of Game 4. Obviously, they got nothing in Game 5. In Game 6, they got a hit in the first inning. In short, you're right, and it's hard telling where that wrong bit of info came from, but it's outa here. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 02:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Incredibly, this error was added over three years ago  and 96 just now caught it. Well, nobody's perfect. Except Larsen. And 17 others. :) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 03:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious Claim
Talk:Great Warford

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Infobox to be added (use Template:Infobox UK place.)
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
 DDStretch  (talk) 13:57, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 

message: I've made a start in structuring the article into sections.  DFH 13:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections 

message: The IPA was ambiguous. I wasn't sure if you meant /griːt/ or /grɪt/ for "Great". Please correct if I'm wrong. kwami 00:37, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronunciation 

message: Neither Dean Green, Gatley Green, Monks Heath nor Soss Moss are within the Great Warford civil parish. All are in the Nether Alderley parish. This article needs a review of the information contained. -- Phildav76 (talk) 23:04, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual errors 

message: Unless this article gains some more reliable sources soon, much of it is going to be deleted. I've already taken out a fair chunk of clear original research, promotional content and unfocussed stuff. Please take a read of some of our policies, notably that concerning verifiability. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 20:51, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work. I've not had a chance to look at it since my preferred references (all in reputable local history books) have been out of my reach in the UK whilst I am usually in China. That may change soon. I can add more sources for the local history of the parish, which should help some of the material get up to scratch.  DDStretch  (talk) 22:17, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing 
Talk:Frances Stevenson

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (names and titles)#Naming conventions for wives of peers for discussion that could lead to this article being renamed. Timrollpickering 19:29, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That link has suffered from moves/renames/bad archiving practice/deletions of useful redirects. I think the discussion is now archived at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility)/Archive 18#Naming conventions for wives of peers and knights. DuncanHill (talk) 13:26, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Article location
Talk:High Legh

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Infobox to be added (use Template:Infobox UK place.) Done 14 May 2007
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.) 
Peter I. Vardy 20:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 