Talk:Aeronautics Defense Dominator

message: This UAV is pretty clearly a robotic derivative of the Rutan Vari-Eze or Long-EZ - are there any sources regarding its development? ericg ✈ 23:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Eric, I noticed the resemblance (minus the canards), too. I don't believe there is any "official" connection to Rutan's design. There is an effort to make a Berkut, which itself is based on the Long-EZ, into a UAV (they've been doing autonomous T&Ls at Mojave), but it's not related to this effort. I will see what I can find out. Akradecki 02:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development 

message: Does anybody have a source that states this is being used by the US Military and not just being confused with the Boeing Dominator.MilborneOne 23:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Military Use 

message: * +Maincat is :Category:Unmanned vehicles
* +Subcat is :Category:UAVs and drones
* +Sub-subcat is :Category:MALE UAVs
I think that the only +cat this article should be in is the +Sub-subcat :Category:MALE UAVs, that is why we have have a +cat hierarchy see Wikipedia:Categorization.  Headphonos 01:09, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: With all due respect, I would disagree. First, there is a Wikipedia guideline, Wikipedia:Categorization and subcategories, that specifically allows listing in main and subcats at the same time. There's a really good reason for this. See, many people will have no idea what a "MALE" UAV is, so they might not think to look there. People looking for specifically MALE articles (is that sexist??) will look there. We want the article in the main cat because that's the more likely place that folks who don't know that much about UAVs are going to look. Bottom line, though, is that there is a wikipedia guideline that specifically allows this. Akradecki 01:27, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I suggest we leave the article as it is written now...and move on to other projects.  Headphonos 02:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a plan to me, although I'm still going to see if I can dig up something on the Long-EZ influence. Same verts, same gear. No canards is especially intriguing...means they've got elevons. Note that the ship is sitting with the nose gear extended...either they have it balasted, or there's a lot of gear up front. A normal EZ has to retract the nose when it's parked. Given the other efforts to make UAVs based on the Long-EZ design, this is an interesting development. Akradecki 02:19, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: +Categories

message: :Image:Dominator UAV.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Dominator UAV.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Aeronautics Defense Dominator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312095420/http://www.aeronautics-sys.com:80/Index.asp?CategoryID=62&ArticleID=72&Page=1 to http://www.aeronautics-sys.com/Index.asp?ArticleID=72&CategoryID=62&Page=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:12, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Aeronautics Defense Dominator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090804071632/http://www.defpro.com/news/details/8886/ to http://www.defpro.com/news/details/8886/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)