Talk:Klymaxx

message: :Image:KlymaxxPromo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:23, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:KlymaxxPromo.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Klymaxx. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160308060120/http://charts.org.nz/showinterpret.asp?interpret=Klymaxx to http://charts.org.nz/showinterpret.asp?interpret=Klymaxx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130225031458/http://riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH_RESULTS to http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH_RESULTS&artist=%22Klymaxx%22
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120409063716/http://top30-2.radio2.be/ to http://top30-2.radio2.be/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:47, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Klymaxx. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100709215538/http://klymaxx.outofprintsoulandfunk.com/ to http://klymaxx.outofprintsoulandfunk.com/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110714065320/http://www.meefers.com/features.asp?id=298 to http://www.meefers.com/features.asp?id=298
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:06, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There are label credits for Klymaxx songs that are false. There are original member names not included. The timeline of members being added is incorrect and is the same exact wording from Bernadette Coopers page. There is a reference to the “official Klymaxx website” that is fraudulent as it contains no one who ever sang on an original Klymaxx record. The word “official” has unfairly diverted traffic away from all other members. I see 60% of all external links to 1 person and Thegooduser suggests that I am biased for wanting to add correct info about other members. I’m not sure how this all works as I spend no time here but Seth Godin talked about “the deletionists” from this site on his Oct 3 podcast. The page also says that the history section has no history or sources so why is it there? It’s there because the deletionist has a bias toward incorrect info and likes it. Bios about living persons whose credits are attributed to someone else, then corrected, then deleted and replaced by the same fraudulent statements causes damage.  JBreezy7 (talk) 01:04, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: , I understand that you are probably frustrated that your hard work has been removed by me, I am not here to discourage you or stop you from editing Wikipedia at all, I am not here for that, You are more than welcome to add the information back if you cite a Reliable Source, and like I mentioned, please read The Conflict of Interest Guideline, and if you are receiving compensation for your edits You must disclose it on your userpage, Thank You, and I hope you will enjoy Wikipedia. :) Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 23:43, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factually inaccurate and information that keeps being promoted by Thegooduser