lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chuck

message: It seems to me that this long list of people whose first name is "Chuck" should be removed from this disambig.  Such "named" folks can be found easily enough with a search, and an article on "Chuck" should contain people or things that are referred to as chuck and chuck alone, since Wikipedia is not a directory and disambiguation pages are not search indices.  Any thoughts?  I'll give it a week, and if nobody objects, trim the page.   ◉ ghoti 18:32, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, done.  Please see WP:D#Lists rationale.   ◉ ghoti 14:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing "People"? 

message: Does anyone think that Chuck Norris should be mentioned on this page? I mean, isn't he sometimes referred to as just "Chuck"? I just wanted to make sure before I just put it on there. --Superpika66 (talk) 23:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Chuck"... Norris? 

message: Given WP:NCP#First name only and looking at some other nickname pages for guidance (e.g. Pete, Larry, Mike), I've restored the non-name Chuck articles to this page and redirected Chuck (disambiguation) back here. Is there a compelling reason to ignore the naming conventions and common practice and split the two lists? -- Intractable (talk) 08:07, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That conflicts with WP:MOSDAB guidelines. Disambiguation pages typically should not contain lists of people by first name unless the person is commonly known by the first name only. They also should not contain non-disambiguation content about the name, such the  template. older ≠ wiser 13:07, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

text: PS, if you want to propose removing the list of names and the infobox, with a simple reference to Charles, that may help. Without any sources or substantial content about the name, such lists of people that share a first name  are unencyclopedic. older ≠ wiser 13:12, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I missed WP:MOSDAB. I agree wrt keeping the name stuff in Charles or if there's enough material to justify an article Chuck (name). --Intractable (talk) 17:49, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  restoring Other section
Talk:Abbott's duiker

message: Nothing at Flickr. Richard001 (talk) 03:45, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I seem to have found an image without a copyright here Takinzinnia (talk) 02:05, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: This article has less number of citations kindly provide proper citations and try to improve article according to Wikipedia policies and kind expand it and if you allow my self I can certainly help you in expanding it. Thanks.--Faizanalivarya (talk) 13:50, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanding and citations required 
Talk:Aders's duiker

message: Combined two articles about the same species. Inks002 02:28, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:African clawless otter

message: According to the last revision (Version 1.10, December 3rd 2023), all the species of Aonyx (A. capensis, A. cinereus and A. congicus) as well as the sole as the only extant member of the genus Lutrogale (L. perspicillata) are moving/were moved to the genus LutraGimly24 (talk) 16:00, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aonyx species + Lutrogale perspicillata --- > Genus Lutra
Talk:International Ornithological Congress

message: FYI, For 10+ years, wikipedia has usually capitalized common bird names in article titles.  There is now a proposal to reverse that convention.  Read more and if you like comment at Talk:Crowned CraneNewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 12:18, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bird article name (capitalisation) 

message: Following discussions on Talk:Crowned crane#Requested move, on Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2014 March#Black crowned crane and especially on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Bird common name decapitalisation, it is now clear that the consensus is not to capitalise the common (vernacular) name of all species.
The guidelines are detailed on Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Animals, plants, and other organisms.
Coreyemotela (talk) 11:11, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name of species are not capitalised
Talk:Culmen (bird)

message: Autochthony writes.  This page is a definition - a very clear definition, I think, but still just a definition.
I tentatively suggest that this page could be merged into a single page of 'Bird parts' - a list of terms used to describe birds' anatomy, appendages, etc.; each term would have a short [like this article] defintion, with a picture if applicable.
Autochthony therefore suggests this.  2020z 23 July 2009.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.161.194.33 (talk) 20:21, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be merged into Beak.--Brambleshire (talk) 03:13, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Angolan genet

message: thumbnail|Angolan Gent  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Axingmayra128.119.169.64 (talk) 19:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

message: The picture on the front page might be the Common genet instead of Angolan genet. The difference between Common Genet and Angolan genet is the common genet with the white tail tip rather than black one. Also, the Common Genet has smaller spots than the Angolan genet. Both species are with back 'socks' on rear legs and have almost same outlook and behavior.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Axingmayra (talk • contribs) 19:50, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Olympic station

message: Does this MTR station have a licence from the International Olympic Committee to use the trademark "Olympic"?--Briguychau (talk) 14:45, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Licence 
Talk:University of Colorado

message: We should rename the page because the entire University of Colorado system went through a change to rename, one we all know verbally different is that the "at" is removed from all school names, even Boulder.
University of Colorado Boulder
University of Colorado Denver
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
University of Colorado Colorado Springs
Although all the schools use the new names and brandings offcially, it does not reflect on some of their websites and documents. we should make the Wikis reflect the changes. They are all going through the branding change right now.
Source: https://www.cu.edu/brand  —   SituAsian (talk • contribs) 18:07, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Naming 

message: There is no University of Colorado Golden as mentioned in the introduction, this can be verified on the University of Colorado page (https://www.cu.edu/).  
The introduction also erroneously states that the system consists of private institutions. --Samuronin (talk) 15:34, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors
Talk:Day of Atonement (Nation of Islam)

message: The article does not discuss its subject but simply states the Pledge. There are no references to NPOV sources. Without either of these there is no clear context for the article, which gives it a polemical slant. andy 19:00, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree, the article should be expanded, but as it is there is no NPOV issue. - RoyBoy 00:57, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Liu Shao (Liu Song)

message: He had an actual imperial name. What was it? — LlywelynII 01:06, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Surely
Talk:Champagne glass

message: This article is directly contradictory. Gas from carbonated drinks is expelled in direct proportion to the surface area of contact between liquid and glass, NOT liquid and air. It can't be both at the same time as stated in this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.118.56.68 (talk) 13:51, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nucleation sites in champagne glasses 

message: I removed the James Bond film reference.  Although properly cited, this reference is really about "champagne stemware in popular culture".  While such a section might be developed in the future, it would be massive and extensive.  Inserting a single claim at this juncture provides undue weight (reader assumes the Bond book has a major cultural impact which is not supported by citation). The claim and citation should be re-added, once a more comprehensive section is developed.  I also removed the Teichroew claim in the "Innovations and novelties" section. The citation in question did not mention her, did not mention sales by MOMA, and did not discuss the unique shape of her glassware (although it was visually depicted). I also removed the "Coupe Stack" claims in the same section.  The citation in question did not mention a ledge, and did not mention that it was for single-tower stacking. If appropriate citations can be found for the Teichroew and "Coupe Stack" claims, they should be re-added with the proper support. - Tim1965 (talk) 18:29, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bond reference and novelties 

message: How is coupe pronounced?  Coupe like koop?  Or coupé like koo-pay? TuckerResearch (talk) 00:29, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm guessing just coop. TuckerResearch (talk) 13:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Coupe simply means -- and is the same word as -- cup. Coupé means "cut" or "cut off". Therefore it's not this word. (But thanks for asking, rather than running around saying "coupé" just because it sounds more French.) Laodah 00:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is coupe pronounced?
Talk:Aaron Rouse

message: While Rouse was certainly "affiliated" with the Arizona Cardinals organization, as he was never part of their active roster during any games during the regular season, did he actually "play" for them?  I would suggest that the basis for a determination would be whether he would've received a Super Bowl ring and share at the end of the season had they gone to it, and don't know for certain whether he would have or not.  I won't edit about this or belabor the point unless I have more information, but wanted to bring it up as a potential issue about people who were on a team's roster for a while, but never actually took the field for them or were even on the active roster for a regular-season game.  75.246.12.46 (talk) 19:34, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Playing" history 
Talk:Troy High School (Michigan)

message: more pics? refs? Victuallers 19:08, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures and references

message: * Nick Cotsonika, author and journalist for the Detroit Free Press
* Sutton Foster, Tony Award-winning Broadway actress
* Ann Gordon, artists and critiquer
* Ellen Hollman, film and television actress
* Emily Hsu, Broadway and television actress
* Kraig Kitchin, CEO of Premiere Radio
* Steve McCatty, former MLB pitcher and coach
* Donna McKechnie, Broadway, television, and film actress
* Christy McDonald, television news reporter and anchor, WXYZ-TV
* Lauren Molina, Broadway actress, musician and cellist
* Roop Raj, television news anchor for WDSU-TV
* Susan Stellin, writer for the New York Times
* Aileen Wuornos, serial killer and inspiration for the movie Monster
needs sourcing
WhisperToMe (talk) 04:25, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable alumni and former students
Talk:Abdul Muntaqim

message: Hi 2403:6200:8830:26A2:ED9D:2BDC:BACC:3D9D (talk) 08:13, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello 2402:800:629F:79A2:ED44:BDB8:3131:DE41 (talk) 09:19, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi
Talk:Abi Finley

message: In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 
* "icliverpool" :
** IC Liverpool 
** IC Liverpool.
DumZiBoT (talk) 19:10, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot report : Found duplicate references ! 
Talk:Florida International University School of Architecture

message: WIth the news of the Lincoln Road location. I was wondering if that information should be added to the page.CSLoomis ( talk | contribs ) 02:55, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facilities 
Talk:Adam Lovell

message: Can you have more than one photo posted on an article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.205.203.170 (talk) 07:19, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Aditayadornkitikhun

message: According to the RTGS rules, the name "ติ๊ด" is romanised as "Tit", not "Tid".
The consonants ฎ, ฏ, ฐ, ฑ, ฒ, ด, ต, ถ, ท, ธ, ศ, ษ, and ส, when ending a syllable, provide the sound of [t] and are all romanised as "t". Please see the RTGS romanisation table.
This is solely a matter of romanising a Thai word, that is, writing a Thai word in Roman letters. There's nothing to do with the English slang/vulgarity "tit".
--YURi (talk) 20:01, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:   You need to be civil and stop the nonsensical edit war. The form "Tit" is the correct one according to the linguistic rules. --YURi (talk) 03:42, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

text: --YURi (talk) 06:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The policy is to follow the RTGS (however much I personally dislike RTGS). So let's follow it 100 percent. It would be folly to use it sometimes and sometimes not depending on one's tender feelings. By the way, see Tit. Widely used without anyone's knickers getting twisted.  Seligne (talk) 08:24, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  RTGS romanisation 
Talk:Whitney Port

message: Can we get a source for her membership in Kappa Alpha Theta? In an episode of The Hills when she is in New York she tells a fellow USC student that she did not belong to a sorority there. 67.80.72.205 (talk) 20:12, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Where is the criticism section in the article (vacuous TV show / all surface and no depth / produces clones like this / fashion industry lap it up for PR - and not for good reasons like real creativity or originality etc.)?
One thing's for sure: she's just not hip. A square would like her would never get a decent job in fashion in the UK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.163.155.196 (talk) 12:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism section 

message: Is she a Jew? Any info on this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.98.239.109 (talk) 18:40, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, according to her website, she is Jewish. All Hallow's (talk) 01:28, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish? 

message: Did Whitney go under the knife?
Yes she did she mentioned it in a vlog but I don't remember which one 173.35.240.92 (talk) 00:08, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nose Job? 

message: https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/whitney-port-says-she-regrets-041641728.html
Majinsnake (talk) 21:48, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leonardo dicaprio
Talk:Adrian Palmer, 4th Baron Palmer

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- HornandsoccerTalk 23:19, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Ahmed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum

message: This is a duplicate, there are 2 records for the same person  with bin and one with Bin , some crap bot has reversed my deletion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.2.136.102 (talk) 04:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have merged Ahmed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum into Ahmed bin Rashid Al Maktoum.  I am also removing the project tags from this talk page as there is no longer a corresponding article.  Thanks.  Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 22:16, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Haji Akbar Turajanzade

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 17:18, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Why is the tajik name Ҳоҷӣ Акбар Тураҷонзода in the first sentence and the title of the article transliterated as Haji Akbar Turajanzade, and not as Hoji Akbar Turajonzoda, as would propose the article about the tajik language? But then, in the text itself he is referred as Turajonzoda. That is strange and inconsistent. I wouldn't like though to just fix every mention of him to the form Turajanzade: I would like to have an explanation, why not to spell him Hoji Akbar Turajonzoda.1260 truthworthy web finds on 2022 10 10 use the name Hoji Akbar Turajonzoda, comparing to merely 50 using Turajanzade, probably some of them being influenced by the current wikipedia text ThomasPusch (talk) 19:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transliteration
Talk:Akihiko Tago

message: This article is clearly notable. This amateur astronomer seems to have a much wider variation of observations than just the common comet or asteroid hunting, and seems to be aware of how to contribute to science. I think the notability flag is clearly unjustified for exactly this article. Said: Rursus (☻) 14:34, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Above notable
Template talk:Christianity and LGBT topics

message: The existence of these two templates seems like an obvious redundancy. Anyone mind if I go ahead?
Dybryd (talk) 03:00, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since this has been done, redirecting Template:LGBT and Christianity and Template:Homosexuality and Christianity to Template:LGBT topics and Christianity, I think we can close this discussion. Debresser (talk) 01:46, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger?

message: We are looking at replacing 'issues' in articles that start 'LGBT issues and/in ...' or end '... and LGBT issues' with 'matters', as some people are not keen on issues, and just 'LGBT' doesn't seem much better.  The proposal is to replace 'issues' in the two templates concerned with 'topics' (ditto for categories), so this template would become 'LGBT topics and Christianity'. Mish (talk) 23:35, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues with issues 

message: This template has articles on views within Christianity about sexual orientation and an article about views within Christianity about transgender (which is related to gender identity not sexual orientation). To reflect this I renamed this template to “Christianity and LGBT topics”. --Devin Murphy (talk) 21:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Renamed to "Christianity and LGBT topics"
Talk:Alvis Woods

message: Just as a correction here, Alvis Woods did not homer on the first pitch he saw in the major leagues.  His first at-bat was against White Sox pitcher Francisco Barrios, and the at-bat was as follows:  
Ball (high), Strike (looking), Foul ball, Foul ball, Home Run (to right field).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JT Dutch (talk • contribs) 21:51, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Botley Hill

message: I have edited this article to reflect the change in location announced by Alan Dawson at the June 2008 Marilynists meet.  The exact summit position was established on 28 July 2008 by a differential levelling survey by John Barnard and Mark Smith using a Leica NA730 optical level.  The surveyors' estimate of height was 270 +/-1 metres but they have adopted the conservative figure of 269m.Galltywenallt (talk) 19:28, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Alan Haines

message: Fair enough - there are refs on the net but they all come back to the Wikipedia article. He was filmed in that role last year - unless it is cut and refilmed or the movie is pulled he will be in it. But when there is a WP:RS we can put it in the artilce. NBeale (talk) 09:30, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solomon Grundy 

message: I hope people will forgive the slightly elastic attitude to WP:RS in reporting Alan's death, but I assure you the information is correct. NBeale (talk) 06:08, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 
Talk:Alan Merrill

message: User 68.174.74.143 has twice removed the (newly added & brief) lead and the 'references' tag, the first time adding in the edit summary "The most recent edits are misleading, malicious in intent." and, in the second "Information recently added is redundant. All relevant sources and references are in the links at the bottom of the pagef for research.". My response to this is 1) The lede is always redundant - it merely summarizes the article and the subject's main claims to notability. 2) External links are not satisfactory references - see WP:SOURCE. I did warn the user after the first edit, I will revert again and appeal to him/her to respond here.  Wwwhatsup (talk) 20:51, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Vanwalker has just repeated 68.174.74.143's edits. One has to assume they are the same editor. I have upped the 'references' tag to 'unreferenced' since there is not one ref in the article, and again replaced the lead. I have left a warning on Vanwalker's page that he/she is in danger of violating WP:3RR. Wwwhatsup (talk) 05:49, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good. Now maybe we can get down to work! Wwwhatsup (talk) 23:26, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  User:68.174.74.143 removing lead and references tag 

message: Rather than hack up the article I propose to gather what third party refs we can muster here, and then work them in once we see what we have. Wwwhatsup (talk) 23:26, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Alan White (English footballer)

message: Has anyone got a free source that says he played 3 times for Middlesbrough? I can find plenty of things that say he made no league appearances, but only that site (which I can't view) that says he did.
--Iae (talk) 14:58, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 games for Middlesbrough 
Talk:Albert Mehrabian

message: This entry does not really contain any significant information on Albert Mehrabian but rather some outlineinformation on a particular part of his work: non-verbal communication.  A lot of information about him can be obtained from his website at http://www.kaaj.com/psych/bio.html  However I think that this is not sufficiently objective to be used "as is".
I suggest that the current article be changed to stub status and those parts of the article (the majority of it) be refiled under another title, e.g. "Silent Messages".
What do you think?
LookingGlass 18:34, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography???!

message: Just removed a direct copyvio from here which was added last December as the only edit of Special:Contributions/Psychscience. I agree with the comment of LookingGlass above, but use the material as a source, don't just paste it in. Vsmith (talk) 14:56, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio removed

message: This article reads like a rant about how a particular part of Mehrabian's work has been "misquoted" and "misinterpreted". While this may be right, it's certainly not very encylopedic. I can't quite figure out how to fix it without knowing the subkect matter more closely and having more experience with this kind of issues. Help would be much appreciated. Kranix (talk | contribs) 10:35, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV and tone issues 

message: iads9 rwj8wbeeg
 eh he
nwy
ngwfwn
2h
rnatqruqey
eybe
hnow
g iwg
 9w
 o
qhqdoja q
Qt 9skj;++(///✓ 151.44.90.27 (talk) 16:03, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  pren
Template talk:LGBT

message: Asexuals and demisexuals aren't inherently LGBT, thus they do not belong in this template. Tdmurlock (talk) 20:04, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I respectfully disagree. Asexual and demisexual people are subject to related discrimination and misunderstanding as sexual minorities and thus belong under the LGBTQ umbrella. Thisisnotatest (talk) 20:45, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing asexuals and demisexuals 

message: I believe the community is moving toward use of LGBTQ+ as an acronym, and would like to see this here. Thisisnotatest (talk) 20:46, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  LGBTQ+ 

message: There is a note 11 but not a note 12. Romania is marked with note 12 and no country is marked with note 11. Is Romania actually note 11? Thisisnotatest (talk) 20:49, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Romania associated with note 11?