lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:History of philosophy in Poland

message: What about Jewish philosophy in Poland?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.82.227.246 (talk) 22:01, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What about it? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  07:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Jewish

message: How about nominating this article for WP:GAC? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  07:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It would make a nice project for someone who would first like to do articles on all the red philosophers' names. I don't know that I'm up to it right now, myself. Nihil novi (talk) 10:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Plenty of scope for new good articles :) I'd suggest merging some short paragraphs, then applying for GAC. WP:RED supports red links, and it would be valuable to see what else the reviewer(s) would ask of that article before it can be considered a GA status; I believe it is pretty close to it already (Good job!).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  19:34, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GAC?

message: This important article is completely missing! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  04:06, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[philosophy in Poland]]

message: There is no mention of any representative of contemporary non-analytical traditions represented in Polish philosophy (beyond Ingarden). What about other phenomenologists, thomists, marxists, and post-marxists?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pernambuco1 (talk • contribs) 17:53, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-analytical Philosophy

message: An understatement of the century. The Communist period should be explained to Western people. http://www.journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/FOLIA/article/view/5209Xx236 (talk) 07:51, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "a disproportionately prominent official role was given to Marxist philosophy" 

message: What about the 21st one?Xx236 (talk) 07:53, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "20th century" 

message: A short list from Polish Wiki Leon Chwistek, Jan Salamucha, Adam Zieleńczyk, Władysław Spasowski, Jakub Segał, Jan Mosdorf, Bolesław Miciński, Michał Sobeski, Stefan Rudniański, Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewicz i Salomon Igel.
Xx236 (talk) 07:56, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tens of philosophers died during WWII 

message: http://bazhum.muzhp.pl/media//files/Kultura_i_Edukacja/Kultura_i_Edukacja-r2007-t-n3/Kultura_i_Edukacja-r2007-t-n3-s49-61/Kultura_i_Edukacja-r2007-t-n3-s49-61.pdf Xx236 (talk) 10:11, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewicz ? 

message: Philosophical Society?
:Weryho lived in Warsaw. The 1904 Society was organised in Lwów by Twardowski. https://encyklopedia.pwn.pl/haslo/Polskie-Towarzystwo-Filozoficzne;3959954.html Xx236 (talk) 10:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  1904 or 1907?
Talk:Vampires: The Turning

message: Why does everyone think this movie is a sequel to John Carpenter's Vampires and John Carpenter Presents Vampires: Los Muertos? This movie doesn't have John Carpenter's name on it and it doesn't refer to the previous two movies anywhere that I'm aware of. Where does it say that this movie is part of the same series as the previous two?
I've confirmed that this is not a sequel as it has a completely different vampire origin story. I've editied this page.
:They think it's a sequel because for some reason it's included in a DVD box set with the John Carpenter movies.--MythicFox 10:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A sequel to John Carpenter's Vampires?
Talk:MacIntyre

message: Just out of curiosity, I set up a Clan Macintyre page a while back, is there a specific reason you started up this one rather then just keeping with that one and adding to it?.Etemenanki 14:25, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In line with other Mac/Mc Names, I suggest merging this one into McIntyre. Please contibute to the discussion at Talk:McIntyre. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:14, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge suggestion
Talk:James Nayler

message: I have removed the obvious inaccuracies/spoiling of this section.  I am not religious so someone with expertise should correct the section.Mike163 (talk) 20:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bristol Event 

message: This article currently has a large number of scare quotes - "followers", "messiah figure", "activists", etc.  Per MOS:SCAREQUOTES, I would recommend that these be removed, unless there's a good reason to keep them - and, if there is a good reason, we should have references to support it. Tevildo (talk) 14:57, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed all scare quotes apart from "naked as a sign". Tevildo (talk) 18:59, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Good job! Thanks. warshy (¥¥) 19:13, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scare quotes
Talk:65th Aggressor Squadron

message: "End of an era: 65th AGRS set to deactivate" http://www.nellis.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123426010  — MrDolomite • Talk 03:13, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  2014 Deactivation 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 65th Aggressor Squadron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090325124757/http://www.airforcehistory.hq.af.mil/Publications/fulltext/combat_sq_of_the_af_wwii.pdf to http://www.airforcehistory.hq.af.mil/Publications/fulltext/combat_sq_of_the_af_wwii.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 17:58, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Kama (weapon)

message: Has this page been vandalized? It is all a mess. Gonna make some corrections, make it a little more useful
Theblindsage 17:09, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mess 

message: Added the disambiguation link as I was looking for the region in Russia, Googled it, and got this page.  From there I had to edit the url and drop (weapon) in order to get to the disambiguation page.  Thus, to help other Wikipedian's in a similar situation, I have added the appropriate linkage. Glandrid (talk) 01:17, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
Talk:Alaskan Command

message: So it seems that Alaskan Command is some sort of unit of the US military??? Perhaps the article should state this in it's
first sentence. As it is, the first sentence describes ALCOM's _mission_. For somebody coming to the page wondering wtf ALCOM actually is, this is unhelpful. 130.225.25.207 (talk) 07:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weak Start 

message: I'm uncertain whether Alaska Command is part of PACOM anymore.  I thought the 2011 Unified Command Plan put Alaska under the NORTHCOM area of responsibility.  Can anyone verify?
Dymaxion (talk) 03:37, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Updating and Additional Review 
Category talk:Military engineering

message: List of all pages in category Military engineering retrieved by PockBot.PockBot is currently Undergoing Trials. If you have any comments on its performance please leave them at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/PockBotArticleClass / StatusMilitary engineerBCombat engineeringnot yet classified911th Engineer Companynot yet classifiedCanadian Military Engineersnot yet classifiedIntegrated Logistics Supportnot yet classifiedIsraeli Engineering Corpsnot yet classifiedRoyal Engineersnot yet classifiedSappernot yet classifiedSiege towerBSupport engineeringnot yet classifiedUnderwater Demolition TeamStartFrederick Henry Baddeleynot yet classifiedJean-Charles de BordaStartHenri Alexis Brialmontnot yet classifiedLazare CarnotBCharles François de MondionStubClearance Divernot yet classifiedMenno van Coehoornnot yet classifiedCésar Cuinot yet classifiedDiades of Pellanot yet classifiedGeorg Wilhelm de Genninnot yet classifiedCharles George GordonBIvan Gravenot yet classifiedConrad HaasStubEmilio Herrera Linaresnot yet classifiedPercy HobartStartPierre Charles L'Enfantnot yet classifiedLeonardo da Vincinot yet classifiedGiffard LeQuesne MartelStubMinentauchernot yet classifiedJames Gabriel MontresorStartJohn MontresorBMozinot yet classifiedPhilo of Byzantiumnot yet classifiedKazimierz Siemienowicznot yet classifiedErnest Dunlop Swintonnot yet classifiedTaccolanot yet classifiedNiccolò Fontana Tartaglianot yet classifiedLennart Torstensonnot yet classifiedEduard Totlebennot yet classifiedVaubanBCharles Warrennot yet classifiedWilliam Yollandnot yet classifiedZhuge Liangnot yet classifiedUnited States Army Corps of EngineersB20th Engineer BrigadeStartBonnet Carré Spillwaynot yet classifiedHarry Burgessnot yet classifiedCalifornia Debris Commissionnot yet classifiedChief of EngineersNACold Regions Research and Engineering LaboratoryStubCorps Castlenot yet classifiedEngineer Officer Basic Coursenot yet classifiedMississippi Valley Divisionnot yet classifiedClarence S. Ridleynot yet classifiedSouth Pacific Divisionnot yet classifiedWaterways Experiment Stationnot yet classifiedBernardo Buontalentinot yet classifiedFra Giocondonot yet classifiedGirolamo Magginot yet classifiedWikipedia:Template messages/Image namespacenot yet classifiedLake Allatoonanot yet classifiedLake Hartwellnot yet classifiedLake Laniernot yet classifiedLake Seminolenot yet classifiedLake Strom Thurmondnot yet classifiedOld Hickory Lakenot yet classifiedRichard B. Russell Lakenot yet classifiedWalter F. George Lakenot yet classifiedTemplate:USACE lakesnot yet classifiedPockBot 11:06, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  PockBot - Category articles summary as of 11:6:8, Thu Dec 7, 2006
Talk:Concordia University (disambiguation)

message: I don't want to cause a giant commotion again, but...
is it necessary to have Concordia University Montreal listed twice on here?
Couldn't we delete the first reference "Concordia University is a university in Montreal"?
Uac1530 03:49, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've eliminated the double listing of Concordia University System... for Uac1530's reasoning. Ccccccccccc 04:07, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: double listing

message: I see a lot of secondary schools creeping into the US section for a list that should be disambiguating universities, colleges, seminaries, and other post-secondary schools. Since none of these high schools or school boards would be referred to as a university, I'm removing them. If you disagree, please explain why they should be listed on a disambiguation page. —C.Fred (talk) 23:06, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope creep
Talk:Secure attention key

message: There is, of course no assurance that "only the kernel" can detect/catch this key, and on PCs this assumption is actually always false, it being easily remapped. 75.30.240.49 03:50, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Remapped how? --Ihope127 00:53, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Brooklyn Friends School

message: Recent edits are biased and violate Wikipedia's Policy. They have been removed.
:I've reverted all the edits back to my last revert to remove vandalism. --Ahc 00:50, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Defacement  

message: I've removed an entry for Darrick Hamilton. Possibly this was Darrick Hamilton but there was not enough information to verify that he was the same person. If he is please restore the entry with a reference for his attendance and a wikilink to his article. 
Meters (talk) 23:39, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alumnus
Talk:Dromon

message: The ship in the upper illustration is not a dromon but a 17th century galley. The fresco is an icon of St. John Chrysostomos and the removal of his remains, now in Byzantine Museum, Athens. 85.130.132.54 03:54, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: None of the links at the end of the article work or are helpful/useful. We should try to fix them/link to the exact useful site. The first two are '404:file not found's and the last one is a central site that doesn't obviously connect to the Byzantine empire/dromons. 72.93.78.209 (talk) 18:22, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Link Errors

message: This part is almost directly copied from the nationmaster.com encyclopedia. 
The dromons had a central tower (xylokastron = wooden castle) near the main mast, from which the marines could use their bow and arrows or throw spears and other projectiles. Dromons were frequently equipped with flamethrowers (siphones, hence the ships were described as siphonophoroi dromones) that discharged Greek fire and catapults capable of hurling 10 kg projectiles up to 250 meters.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Esk3 (talk • contribs) 02:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copied??

message: The Byzantine Navy article includes more info about the Dromon than this article does. Should we incorporate some of that info into this article and thin that one out, or just leave them??? Esk3 (talk) 02:27, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Having rewritten the Byzantine navy article to its current form, I intend to flesh the dromon article further out, but I am rather busy in real life lately. If you want to copy the info from the Byzantine navy article, do so, but do not "thin out" the latter. A general overview of the dromon is essential there. Constantine   ✍  10:04, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Byzantine Navy Article

message: In what way are the chelandion variants actually dromons? From the article it's not entirely clear since I assume that a dromon is a specific type of war galley. If so, why are the ousiakon and the pamphylon not described as separate ship types of their own? What is the actual common denominator other that they were all used by the Byzantine navy?
Peter Isotalo 16:16, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chelandion 
Talk:102nd Intelligence Wing

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 102d Intelligence Wing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.house.gov/list/hearing/ma10_delahunt/mmrcct.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110923175757/https://www.defenseimagery.mil:80/imagery.html to http://www.defenseimagery.mil/imagery.html#a=search&s=102d%20fighter%20wing&n=90
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 11:29, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: [[
File:Mississippi|thumb|readying
Small text
==== --199.44.218.30 (talk) 15:13, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  mississippi 
Template talk:United States federal executive departments

message: Kickoff of discussion of inclusion of Proposed departments on the navbox?
*My gut says no, per not a crystal ball.  Warrants an article, but not inclusion here, yet. — MrDolomite | Talk 03:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Have gotten rid of.  It's rather unlikely ever to happen. If it was a proposal from someone who had a serious chance of making it happen, that might be another thing.  Morwen - Talk 07:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Department of Peace

message: Should there be a category for former cabinet-level departments that have been "demoted"?  After all, the Department of the Navy still exists; it's just been placed under the purview of the Department of Defense.  Admittedly, the Department of the Navy is, to the best of my knowledge, the only Cabinet-level department to be reorganized this way, unless you count the Post Office.  Thoughts? --Micahbrwn 19:03, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes- and shouldn't the Department of the Army be in there too? 69.145.66.213 (talk) 19:30, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New status?

message: I was thinking, would it not be more appropriate to order them in the other in which they were created instead of alphabettically? Andy120290 (talk) 18:30, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change the order?
Talk:Damage controlman

message: Since the article is centered on what a damage controlman is/does, shouldn't a picture of some damage controlman in action be the profile photo instead of just a high-ranking enlisted damage controlman in whites at ground zero? I'd be glad to upload a few personal ones.136.160.157.190 (talk) 20:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: This is a real weak article. For the US Navy, Damage controlman as a rating has not consistently existed, It has undergone periods of disestablishment. That information should get added. I write and think of this from the United States Navy perspective= what about other larger Nation's navies? 
Wfoj3 (talk) 22:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating History
Talk:Albert Canet

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article.-- Jreferee 00:19, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Atambua

message: There is a new famous shopping centre / mall on Pasar Baru, it's called Jabal Mart Supermarket/Swalayan. It is located at Jl. Gajah Mada, Beside the Governor House, Atambua 85711. Jolly98 (talk) 21:45, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The new jabal mart @ atambua
Talk:Afro Costa Rican

message: I removed the part about the conquistadores. As I seem to recall (from my history lessons, back in high school!) "african jamaican" people were bought as slaves during the colony, not the conquest. I also have heard that they were prohibited from coming to Cartago or any other region of the country even during the begining of the past century. Also I have never actually heard the term "Afro Costa Rican", but I can´t think of another "politicaly correct"  term! --196.40.10.246 04:07, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:U.S. Army M1943 uniform

message: This article, and the others in the series, REALLY, REALLY, REALLY need illustrations. --Michael K SmithTalk  20:21, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Lists price and store selling reproductions of a uniform.
Kevin32s (talk) 22:14, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement?
Talk:Philippines men's national basketball team at the 1990 Asian Games

message: This article of the Philippines Dream Team should be about the 1990 All-pro national team coached by Robert Jaworski.. the 1994 was not a dream team - its a PBA franchise, San Miguel Beermen with loan players from the other teams and from the amateur ranks... the 1998 already had a name and that is the Philippine Centennial Team... peads 04:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I agree that the article should only be about the 1990 team. Also, the wording in the article needs to be changed. The text looks more like an expression of disappointment in the Philippine national team's past failures ("embbarrasing finish", "many Filipinos question if these players deserve to be called 'professionals'" etc.) rather than an entry in an encyclopedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 125.60.243.83 (talk) 13:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1990 team only, article content 

message: the article has now been changed to the 1990 squad. feel free to put more info on their performance in the Asian Games. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nastrans (talk • contribs) 12:21, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  entry replaced 
Talk:Goapele

message: Ethnicity should generally not be emphasized in the opening unless it is relevant to the subject's notability, I would agree. But here I believe that it is relevant to the subject's notability. For example, she is listed on the Wikipedia list of Black Jews. Pls revert. Tx.  --Epeefleche 04:19, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Could a knowledgable Wkipedian please convert gwa-puh-LAY into the International Phonetic Alphabet, please? Peace. —MuzikJunky (talk) 04:53, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: IPA
Talk:New trade theory

message: There are several problems with this page.  The biggest one is in the opening sentence.  If we define New Trade Theory (NTT) as those theories that take into account internal and external economies of scale then NTT is not a critique of free trade in and of itself.  Yes, one can derive results from NTT that show that free trade can make a country worse off, but many of the results provide more support for free trade.  "International Economics" by Krugman/Obstfeld provides many of these arguments.  I would edit the page myself but my knowledge of NTT is limited.  However, I do know what I just wrote above.  Stankweed111 06:14, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have to agree. Every theory is a collection of something. The opening part says almost nothing on the subject.--AsiBakshish  (talk) 09:05, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems 

message: Dr. Roson has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Roson has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Roberto Roson & Kazuhiko Oyamada, 2014. "Introducing Melitz-Style Firm Heterogeneity in CGE Models: Technical Aspects and Implications," Working Papers 2014:04, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 16:28, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Roson's comment on this article 

message: What's going on with the paragraph that says some guy at MIT came up with the theory first and showed it to some other guy, but they decided it wasn't important and never wrote a paper about it or anything?  No citation, no evidence? John Moser (talk) 20:29, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  My friend invented it first
Talk:Life on Mars (disambiguation)

message: Someone searching for "Life on Mars" could, legitimately, be looking for information on the Lego Space theme.  The fact that the Lego theme is not considered significant enough to warrant an article in its own right doesn't mean that it shouldn't appear on a disambig page (Lego Space does indeed have a section devoted to LoM).
Similarly, see the disambig page John Smith - many of the John Smiths listed (specifically, the fictional characters) are not significant enough to warrant their own article, but because users may be searching for them, and information on them is included on other pages, those pages are listed. FiggyBee 05:01, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. I adjusted the text to better fit the format of disambiguation pages (WP:MOSDAB), and adjusted the link to point directly to the appropriate section of the Lego Space article. I took out the reference to it being the "last" such theme, since that could become incorrect if Lego were to release another. Information that needs to be kept up to date is better kept in the articles, rather than on a disambiguation page where it might get overlooked. --Srleffler 05:15, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lego Space Theme 

message: See Talk:Life on Mars#Move?. Andrewa (talk) 14:42, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Page moves

message: As the name of this Wikiproject may provide confusion with the article located at Life on Mars (to which is it unrelated to), I thought you'd like to know about a change to the naming of that project, see WT:WikiProject Life on Mars -- 67.70.32.20 (talk) 06:08, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:WikiProject Life on Mars