lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Panama

message: In the Administrative divisions section under Politics, it is stated that there are five Comarcas while there are six listed below.
Essentially, please change "Also, there are five Comarcas..." to "Also, there are six Comarcas..." Kake6000 (talk) 04:31, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: per this source. Next time, please make you supply a reliable source to back your proposed change. M.Bitton (talk) 12:10, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 August 2023 

message: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16737193/#:~:text=In%20the%20general%20population%20of,25.40%25%2C%20a%20Caucasian%20origin.
In the general population of Panama, 38.72% of genes from the genetic pool have an African origin, 35.87%, an Amerindian origin and 25.40%, a Caucasian origin. 2600:1011:B120:316B:3457:1236:3428:6160 (talk) 23:25, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Shadow311 (talk) 15:46, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 January 2024 

message: Request to add Mass media in Panama under Panama#Culture. 203.149.142.34 (talk) 11:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Question: what are we supposed to do with the article's title? M.Bitton (talk) 01:26, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

text: assuming you intended for Mass media in Panama to be added to the Culture section hatnote. — Urro[talk][edits] ⋮  14:01, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 February 2024 

message: The article on the US invasion of Panama claims that most Panamanians supported the invasion. It cites a HRW report and an academic text. I haven't yet read the text, but I looked at the HRW report and couldn't find anything in it backing up the claim. I highly doubt Panamanians supported the invasion, as it levelled neighbourhouds, displaced twenty thousand, and likely killed thousands.
Here's a World Bank article that paints a much more accurate picture of Panamanian sentiment regarding the invasion:https://theworld.org/stories/2023/12/20/panamanians-remember-1989-us-invasion-and-continue-demand-justice-and Theodore.shouse (talk) 02:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panamanian Support for 1989 US Invasion
Talk:Mycin

message: :"...and only slightly worse than those physicians who were themselves experts in the field (average correct diagnosis rate of about 80%)."
Surely a differential in recognition rates of 15% is not a "slight" difference? --86.139.39.232
:Apparently it was. My guess is that it turned out to not be flexible enough, but nobody wanted to say so. --maru   (talk)  contribs 19:55, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usefulness 

message: Ok this article makes no sense to me, as a layman.  I don't even understand what the article is describing.  Is it some sort of computer system??  --Taco325i 13:21, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. --maru   (talk)  contribs 19:55, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comprehensibility 

message: Hi all the section on evidence combination is entirely based on reference 4. Should I have put the 4 in more places or is what I have done enough? EvilxFish (talk) 20:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evidence combination referencing
Talk:Portland Trail Blazers

message: The transactions section, in particular the list of draft picks, is ridiculously long and contains a lot of non-notable picks.  More than half of these could be cut from this list, and/or moved to the rather underutilized List of transactions involving the Portland Trail Blazers article.  I say keep the #1 picks (Walton, Oden, etc), league award winners, All-Star quality players, infamous picks (Bowie), and remove/move the rest. --Billdorr (talk) 09:32, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bloated Transactions section 

message: This 2008 article has significant uncited material (see the History and Front office sections) while the History section is overwhelmingly biased towards recent events. If these issues aren't fixed, a GAR may be necessary. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues with article
Talk:Printed circuit board

message: www.pcbonline.com is a commercial website with product for sale.  That makes it SPAM.  Constant314 (talk) 04:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why I am not adding this content with refernce? 

message: === File Extension of PCB Layer on Autodesk EAGLE ===
File Extension	PCB Layer
.cmp          	Top Copper
.sol          	Bottom Copper
.stc          	Top Soldermask
.sts          	Bottom Soldermask
.plc          	Top Silkscreen
.pls          	Bottom Silkscreen
=== File Extension of PCB Layer on  Altium Designer ===
File Extension	PCB Layer
.GTO          	Top Overlay
.GTP          	Top Paste
.GTP1         	Top Paste
.GTS1         	Top Solder
.GTS          	Top Solder
.GTL          	Top Solder
Top Layer     	<2-11
.G1           	Mid-Layer 1
.G2           	Mid-Layer 2
.GBL          	Bottom Layer
.GBS          	Bottom Solder
.GBP          	Bottom Paste
.GBO          	Bottom Overlay
.GM1          	Mechanical 1
.GM7          	Mechanical 7
.GM13         	Mechanical 13
.GM15         	Mechanical 15
.GM16         	Mechanical 16
.GKO          	Keep-Out Layer
.GPT          	Top Pad Master
.GPB          	Bottom Pad Master
Here : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerber_format PoxVox (talk) 06:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Types of Gerber Format Files 

message: File Extension	PCB Layer
.GTO          	Top Overlay
.GTP          	Top Paste
.GTP1         	Top Paste
.GTS1         	Top Solder
.GTS          	Top Solder
.GTL          	Top Solder
Top Layer     	<2-11
.G1           	Mid-Layer 1
.G2           	Mid-Layer 2
.GBL          	Bottom Layer
.GBS          	Bottom Solder
.GBP          	Bottom Paste
.GBO          	Bottom Overlay
.GM1          	Mechanical 1
.GM7          	Mechanical 7
.GM13         	Mechanical 13
.GM15         	Mechanical 15
.GM16         	Mechanical 16
.GKO          	Keep-Out Layer
.GPT          	Top Pad Master
.GPB          	Bottom Pad Master
Here : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerber_format PoxVox (talk) 06:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  File Extension of PCB Layer on  Altium Designer<ref name=":1" />
Talk:Political correctness/Featured article removal candidates results

message: There is an ongoing neutrality dispute. Emsworth 23:36, Feb 15, 2004 (UTC)
*I'm not saying this article should be here, but I will say that the substance of the dispute seems to be "the article is too long for such a silly topic" which isn't a very convincing objection IMO. I've asked a couple of times for a dialogue relating to the dispute, and there doesn't seem top be much interest. Sam Spade 19:46, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Political correctness]]
Talk:Wirbelwind

message: The wiki article on the 20mm flak 30 and 38 does a good job explaining the notion that the Flak 38 was a gun, mounted in various ways including the 4-gun flakvierling mount. "Vier" being German for "four", I would think it is pretty obvious. The Flakvierling is NOT a four-barrelled gun; each flak 38 had its own full mechanisms and each gun fired on its own. So it is analogous to a US quad fifty caliber MG mount, but not to, say, a true multibarrel gun such as a minigun. The current edit makes sense. Regards, DMorpheus (talk) 16:12, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly, it is similar to the Maxson Mount, which is also not a "single gun with four barrels."  Graff977 (talk) 21:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flakvierling 

message: "Thereafter, the 2 cm shells proved less effective against aircraft . . . " is messy, IMO, on a couple of counts. "Thereafter", grammatically, presupposes a 'there' for the 'after' to be after, but no date is given or even inferred. And "less effective" grammatically requires something else for it to be less effective then. Now I know that the writer almost certainly meant than the 37mm gun (in the Ostwind) but this isn't stated, and as the Ostwind hadn't been developed at this point the statement wouldn't make sense even if it were so stated.
So I am editing this to "However, the 2cm shells proved ineffective against aircraft . . . ".
Actually I am not too happy with this, as what I really mean is something like 'insufficiently effective". So, cancel the above, I am going to edit the start of the sentence to "However, in combat the 2cm shells were felt to be insufficiently effective against aircraft and so . . . "
I know - a very long justification of a simple edit.  Gog the Mild (talk) 17:12, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Thereafter . . . "
Talk:Silesian Voivodeship (1920–1939)

message: I've removed the following from the article as it is non-factual and extremely POV. The Voivodeship officially ceased to exist in Sept. 1939. There is no connection whatsoever between the current voivodeship, which was created in 1999, and the voivodeship from before the war. The current voivodeship is not in any sense a "successor" to the previous one. The last sentence is blatantly POV. I've also cleaned up the English and removed other POV statements.
"The status of autonomy was forcibly removed on May 6, 1945 by the ruling Polish Workers' Party.
Its successor is the current Silesian Voivodeship, which has the same city — Katowice — as its capital. Up today, Polish authorities don't want to give back autonomy of Silesia[citation needed]." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dominus Vobisdu (talk • contribs) 10:19, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you wrong. The Voivodeship not officially ceased to exist in Sept. 1939. From 1939 to 1945 this is occupation. "There is no connection whatsoever between the current voivodeship, which was created in 1999, and the voivodeship from before the war. The current voivodeship is not in any sense a "successor" to the previous one." - ok, I agree. LUCPOL (talk) 14:39, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You are wrong. The area of Sil. Voiv. was formally not occupied during the II WW. This area, as well as western parts of pre-war Poland were incorporated into III Reich, therefore they didn't hold an occupied territory status (see e.g. Polish areas annexed by Nazi Germany). Therefore, legally or not, but certainly for sure formally and practically - this voivodeship ceased to exist. Masur (talk) 19:03, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Practically, not oficially and internationally. Countries in the world (not connected with the Germany) did not accept new borders of Germany during World War II. LUCPOL (talk) 20:13, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup and removing POV 

message: Similarly to the Poznan and Pomeranian Vojvodeships of the era, the bulk of this Vojvodeship was former German territory. Should the page include some sort of article highlighting the German minority and their numbers like the two articles I have mentioned here have? Sandjaar (talk) 13:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  German minority
Talk:Hot reading

message: Does anybody know a good example we could add here, like John Edward is on the cold reading page? I know of James Randi intercepting the radio transmissions from a confederate a faith healer was using to diagnose the illnesses of his would-be patients before their eyes, but I can't remember the healer's name and I'm not turning anything up on Randi's webpage. Might be in one of his books.
Samnell 17:15, May 12, 2004 (UTC)
:*Peter Popoff. --BillC 05:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What about early in The Wizard of Oz, when Professor Marvel sneaks a peek at Dorothy's photo? It's a scene that a lot of readers will have seen. 129.7.152.16 05:34, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cold reading

message: The current initial reference 1 as well as primary reference for "warm" reading both are from a personal website. The Times article actually defines the term (suggesting the reader needs a definition) by directly quoting without reference either the same personal website, or this wiki article. Wikipedia should not be used to promote neologisms.
Additionally, the reference used to support the differentiation from cold reading has been reported to Firefox as an "attack site"; thus the 'dubious' tag was placed. - Steve3849talk 21:21, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs better references if not to appear a neologism 

message: I have just started a history section. Much could be added, but I will just stick to a few notable cases. HealthyGirl (talk) 17:42, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Autosuggestion

message: The article summary only says that Autosuggestion "is a psychological technique", "has not been proven", and that somebody believes in it.
These are things that a quick reader doesn't care about. What does autosuggestion mean? This is missing. 156.62.3.26 (talk) 22:20, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please review article summary 

message: The evidence section says: "In the early 20th century, Emile Coue used autosuggestion to cure patients; his work is evidence to support the existence of autosuggestion and the power of the human mind".
How is "his work" evidence? In the early 20th century, people also used radium water to "cure" patients, resulting in painful death.
Also, the "clinical trials" talks about a different technique, and says very little about autosuggestion itself. Destynova (talk) 03:00, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evidence and clinical trials? 

message: Coue is wrong about the lack of 'willpower' by which children are more susceptible to autosuggestion than adults. It has nothing to do with willpower, it has to do with intimidation. Children are intimidated by adults and want to please them. They also assume adults know what they are talking about, especially ones with 'doctor' credentials! So when Coue tells them they can't unclasp their hands, they simply do as they are told. A similar effect is at the root of Loftus' false-memory experiments. Loftus doesn't implant false memories, she uses peer pressure from family members and friends to tell the person who can't remember the false memory that they're wrong. When everyone you know is telling you you're wrong, you're going to accept that sooner or later because resisting requires too much energy. And whether it happens sooner or later is not a mechanism of willpower, but rather of ego. willpower is a word to describe what happens when a person decides to do something on their own volition, not when someone is messing with them. When someone is gaslighting you (which is essentially what Coue was doing to those children), your sense of self is what protects you from your reality being distorted. Willpower is nothing more than a euphemism for stubbornness in this context.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.5.215.119 (talk) 02:52, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Willpower
Talk:Longnose gar

message: "The longnose gar ranges in length from 60–100 cm (24–40 inches) and weighs 0.5–3.5 kg (1–7 pounds); FishBase reports a maximum size of 2 m."
Well... which one is it?  Do they range from 0.6m to 1m, or 0.6m to 2m?  There's no attribution to the 0.6m-1m, so how is anyone to even take a faint stab at figuring out which is the more reputable statement? Jrssystemsnet (talk) 20:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it means they usually get up to 1m, but can, in correct conditions, get up to 2m...Smarkflea (talk) 18:37, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  which length range is correct? 

message: I see nothing in this article to suggest the fish is in any way primitive. Shouldn't that need to be cited?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.61.208.171 (talk) 13:04, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be cited, but it's true none the less.  They have many features of primitive fish, such as bony scales and a toothed snout.  I also believe there are similarities in internal body structure as well, but I don't know enough about it.  Lime in the Coconut 19:46, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primitive?
Talk:Killing of Nick Berg/Nunh-huh

message: This page was rather annoyingly and tacitly protected while I was in the midst of editing it. Presumably because of the picture issue, as no one bothered to explain? So I'm storing the changed previewed text here. 
:Please restore or rephrase "His capture and killing was said to have been carried out to avenge abuses of Iraqi prisoners by U.S. soldiers at Abu Ghraib prison." of the first paragraph. This was the known reason why he was killed. Without this line, his death could be out of context. -- Toytoy
::Toytoy, if he was killed in Early April and The Abu Ghraib story didn't break until weeks later, isn't it likely that the reason for the act was manufactured later in order to grab headlines? - Tεxτurε 18:48, 12 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: As my (attempted) edit summary would have explained, the purported "reason" for the killing is already mentioned in an appropriate place in the article: it doesn't belong in the "lede". - Nunh-huh 18:50, 12 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Good. Update Nick Berg/Draft so we can see the whole thing. - Tεxτurε 19:12, 12 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: That's it for now (I must confess I don't see the point of protecting a page and cloning it to enforce one's "no-gory-picture" rule...now that someone's placed the picture in question on the cloned page I suppose that too will be protected.) Maybe we'll have better info on dates of birth and death when all the protectionism is over. - Nunh-huh 19:17, 12 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: ==
Talk:Afonso IV of Portugal

message: So did he die on May 12 or May 28? --Naddy 18:46, 12 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: , which portrait is most suitable to the article is debatable, but the style of the portrait you've restored is much more primitive and less painterly than the one you reverted, which is admittedly less flattering. That, however, should not be the criterion by which we judge the artistry of the portrait. Contrary to your subjective opinion of which is the better image, his rendering of the armor alone is enough to demonstrate the superior skill of the painter of the earlier portrait. Carlstak (talk) 15:24, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh I agree that whether the image is flattering to the subject or not is completely irrelevant and that the painting itself is of a lesser caliber than the original, but I think the other's actual image quality (pixels, colouration, etc.) is just horrendous, therefor I believe the better quality one (in terms of image quality and not subject quality) would be better suited - though obviously both are not perfectly ideal. Do you see what I mean? Cristiano Tomás (talk) 21:24, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I see what you mean, although personally, I would accept the degraded image quality to have what I consider an image more expressive of Afonso's character. It's not a big issue, so I can live with your choice. Carlstak (talk) 23:04, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Choice of portrait of Afonso IV
Talk:Gaussian gravitational constant

message: To Jbergquist: You keep using
:(1 + m)\,
in your formulas. Since 1 is a dimensionless number, then so must m be. What is m? You have not defined it. JRSpriggs (talk) 07:47, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is little "m"? 

message: It seems to be yet another article pasted together from several stubs, without much editing. The statement "he had already used the concept to great success in predicting the orbit of Ceres in 1801" is questionable. He probably used it for that, we have no account of what he actually did, other than what he published years later in Theoria Motus. I'm pretty sure that "It is equal to the square root of GM☉" is just plain wrong - it is equal to the square root of G, not GM. I have references for this. What does this even mean... "The Gaussian gravitational constant is related to an expression which is the same for all bodies orbiting the Sun" ...?
We have contradictions:
:The Gaussian gravitational constant is now an IAU defining constant used to define the astronomical unit.
:In 2012 the definition of the astronomical unit was changed again, to be equal to a precise numerical value,
Which is it?
What does this mean... "The term "gravitational constant" comes from the fact that k2 is related to the standard gravitational parameter" ...? A constant is a constant - a definition of a fundamental quantity.
Many other problems. Tfr000 (talk) 02:30, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Many problems with this article
Talk:Killing of Nick Berg/Archive 1

message: [Spokesman Says Berg Never Held by Forces]
Wikipedia text: 
:Berg had intended to return to the United States on March 30, 2004; however, he was detained in Mosul on March 24 by Iraqi police at a checkpoint. His family claims he was turned over to U.S. officials and held for 13 days without access to legal counsel. FBI agents visited his parents to confirm his identity on March 31, but he was not immediately released. After his parents filed suit in federal court in Philadelphia on April 5, claiming that he was being held illegally, he was released from U.S. custody. He said that he had not been mistreated during his confinement. The U.S. maintains that at no time was Berg in coalition custody. Following his release, Berg travelled to Baghdad, where he stayed at the Al Fanar Hotel. Still in Iraq, he last contacted his family on April 9, at which time he said that he intended to return to the United States via Jordan. 
:Berg's family, however, blamed the U.S. government, particularly the policies of the Bush administration that led to his arrest and detainment in April, for creating the circumstances that lead to Nick's death. Michael Berg stated that if his son hadn't been detained for so long, he might have been able to leave the country before the violence worsened. [2] His father reportedly stated: "I think a lot of people are fed up with the lack of civil rights this thing has caused. I don't think this administration is committed to democracy."
=== Draft page ===
Use this for a draft - Keep it free of horror photos. Thanks. Nick Berg/Draft - Stevertigo 18:48, 12 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Held by US Forces? 

message: Use this for a draft - Keep it free of horror photos. Thanks. Nick Berg/Draft - Stevertigo 18:48, 12 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draft page
Talk:University of Innsbruck

message: New call for action: As already previously said, please revert the last meaningful edit, thanks! Also, please correct the rest of the German text. I did some translation already, but there is more to do!212.152.150.236  00:35, 19 May 2006 (UTC+1)
Catholic Theology Faculty is wrongly linked to covenant theology! Kurusj (talk) 08:56, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of minor planets

message: How'd you guys get this done? a bot? wow!--Urthogie 21:31, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Several large Excel spreadsheets, with clever formulae. Mostly my work. Urhixidur 02:01, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How do the formalae work? Sagittarian Milky Way 03:36, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I routinely write scripts for stuff like this but I've never tried it for wiki. sed,awk, perl, etc can generate a lot of things but the real question is if you can automate the process, why is this list even needed? Doesn't NASA have a similar DB somewhere? It does seem a DB rather than an encyclopedia table, even for an electronic encyclopedia, makes more sense. Did this come up for deletion ever? Nerdseeksblonde (talk) 02:21, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Binary digits are cheap and it doesn't hurt anyone. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 19:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  How was this made 

message: Do we really need an article for every asteroid. Surely 950_Ahrensa or 976 Benjamina are not notable. I think very few of these are notable. Couldn't they just be combined into one large page for every thousand asteroids?--God <FONT FACE="Symbol">Ω</font>  War 04:19, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: agreed
U0000 is null (talk) 21:20, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

text: If someone cares enough to write an article that's good enough for me. WP:WIKIISN'TPAPER. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 19:34, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  So many pages