Talk:Lisa Graham Keegan

message: The WikiProjectArizona was formed to foster better articles on the U.S. state ofArizona with a spirit of cooperation. WikiProjectArizona and its subpages contain suggestions on formatting and layout of articles, which can be discussed at the project's talk page. To participate, simply add your name at the participant’s section.
 
It is intended to pull together interested and knowledgeable editors to improve all articles about Arizona. Thus, it covers the creation and editing of articles related to the U.S. State Arizona, its cities, counties, geography, transportation, culture, people, history and traditions. The aim is to build a broad and deep collection of solid articles about Arizona and Arizonans. All editors are welcome. Ways you can join in include the following:
helping create the templates necessary for the project;
reading over articles and giving your suggestions in the article's talk pages;
copyediting for grammar and clarify;
adding photos;
reverting vandalism;
citing sources;
fact checking;
minor or major research and contributions;
advertising the project by posting the WikiProject template in relevant talk pages.12.2.200.10 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 16:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: What on earth are you talking about?  What scam?  Which organizations are not mentioned?  If you have sourced and notable information about her that is not in the article, why don't you put it in, instead of mystifying everyone with dark suggestions?  -- Zsero (talk) 13:34, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's my "dark suggestion:" how about stop using YouTube sources and the National Review as credible sources? Please note WP:NPOV and words to watch, because this article is full of it. Wikipedia:Manual of Style (lead section) may be helpful as well. мirаgeinred سَراب ٭  (talk) 05:11, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

text: For an article about a woman who has worked closely with Republican politicians, "conservative" seems to be the dirty word here. Also, while the article previously said her works have been published by the NYT, I found that the term "published" has been used very loosely. http://www.nytimes.com/1998/01/11/opinion/l-closed-charter-schools-006190.html This is the only article that seemed to have been written by her. Clearly merits a mention in an encyclopedia article. мirаgeinred سَراب ٭  (talk) 05:34, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

text: Someone claimed one was public domain and that the other belonged to the user. They were clearly promotional pictures. The same pictures could be found on Keegan's websites. мirаgeinred سَراب ٭  (talk) 22:47, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

text: Read what public domain is before attacking me. If my requests for speedy deletion were in error, they would not have been deleted. мirаgeinred سَراب ٭  (talk) 23:21, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

text: Also, if you want to be more subtle about your views towards Keegan, I would suggest stop editing from the Maricopa County Government's server. I guess that would explain this as well.  If you are not familiar with Wikipedia's manual of style or its policies on neutrality, don't be so quick to attack me, and word your questions constructively. Thanks. мirаgeinred سَراب ٭  (talk) 23:37, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Lisa Graham Keegan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080922002554/http://archives.cnn.com:80/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/12/19/bush.cabinet/index.html to http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/12/19/bush.cabinet/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:09, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Is there a reason why the name of her book is formatted in bold?--Mr. Guye (talk) 02:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bold books