Talk:Marine pollution

message: Hi I study European Environmental Law and Policy, and I am currently working on a presentation focusing on Marine Pollution.
does anyone have any material on the subject??  
Regards, 
Daniela Cassar, MaltaBold text
If the primary author will Google "source of mercury in oceans" he will find many articles that say that human-caused pollution is not a feasible explanation for the mercury concentrations that are found in oceans or in the flesh of oceanic fish.
Numerous researchers have found that concentrations found in fish haven't changed in decades (some have found none in 100 years, thanks, I assume, to the existence of old tins of fish somewhere that were made available for study). Hydrothermal vents are thought to be the principal source.
--71.217.23.46 07:38, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  marine pollution 

message: I've redirected Effects of Ocean Pollution here, as I couldn't see any reason for independent article at that title, previous content at  was mainly centred around reference at  which I'm noting here in case its useful for this article -Hunting dog (talk) 21:18, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect from Effects of Ocean Pollution 

message: PBIO4181j Evaluation
The material in this article is very well organized, you can find specific information on the topic you are looking for without having to scroll through the entire article. There is a broad coverage of the different forms of marine pollution, not just an overview. Each subcategory has a description of the subject and specific examples. The citations came from reliable sources, such as the US Department of Commerce, but there is one article I found that could be useful in the underwater noise section "http://www.nature.com/articles/srep37979". I don't think any assumptions were made, however there were a few proposed solutions to the problems. One section that I thought was well written was the toxins section. It had a thorough description and a lot of specific examples. A few sections I felt were lacking were the underwater noise and adaptation/ mitigation sections. They lacked more of the specific examples and could use a few more sources, one of which I posted above. One section that I thought could use some work was the land runoff section. It was extremely short with no specific examples. I do not have any sites to reference for that section, but I suggest looking into different locations and seeing if they have any data, such as lake St. Mary's in Ohio. They had a lot of farm runoff that produced harmful algal blooms a few years ago but no one has heard of it. 
Alexis redmond (talk) 13:45, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solutions section 

message: There are around a few links don't work (e.g. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0025326X17301558) etc. and have copyright issue that the website would not show the full article. There is an unbalance distribution between some subtitles as some include detailed physics and chemistry explanation while the others do not and are underrepresented.— ssss
This article is very well written and organized with a fairly neutral standpoint. There is information about many different forms of marine pollution, not focusing on one form. I checked a few references and they were peer-reviewed scholarly articles. There was one reference (reference number 92) that redirected me to “page not found” here:  http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?DocumentID=659&ArticleID=6897&l=en
Every time there is a fact or statistic in the article, it is backed up by a source in the references section. Many of the articles are from 2004-2009, which could be updated to more recent sources. I think the section on land run-off could be expanded and backed up by many facts about how farm run-off causes a great deal of marine pollution. But for the most part, this is a concise and valid article. Kenzie M (talk) 05:17, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation 

message: Since China has large population, so it will be more fair to rank the countries by discharge per coastal population.
Jambeck et al (2015) also give information of coastal population, so discharge per population can be calculated.  However, there're only information from top 20 countries ranked by total discharge, while the rest (from total 192 studied countries) are missing.
Science mag (via ) offer the data but need login.  Could anyone get those data?
--Ans (talk) 09:57, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Direct discharge (top countries) 

message: I've removed the further reading list as I don't think it was adding value.
*Cookson, Clive (Feb. 2015). Oceans choke as plastic waste pours in at 8 million tonnes a year (free registration required), The Financial Times
*Ahn, YH; Hong, GH; Neelamani, S; Philip, L and Shanmugam, P (2006) Assessment of Levels of coastal marine pollution of Chennai city, southern India. Water Resource Management, 21(7), 1187–1206
*Daoji, L and Dag, D (2004) Ocean pollution from land-based sources: East China sea. AMBIO – A Journal of the Human Environment, 33(1/2), 107–113
*
*
*
*Slater, D (2007) Affluence and effluents. Sierra 92(6), 27
*UNEP/GPA (2006) The State of the Marine Environment: Trends and processes United Nations Environment Programme, Global Programme of Action, The Hague. 2006 
*UNEP (2007) Land-based Pollution in the South China Sea. UNEP/GEF/SCS Technical Publication No 10
*Judith S. Weis: Marine pollution: what everyone needs to know. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford 2015,  EMsmile (talk) 04:01, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed further reading list 

message: Please contribute to the discussion on where the bulk of the content on microplastics in oceans should be located. Currently it's spread over several articles, and I would like to consolidate it in one (and then link from the others to the consolidated location). Either in this article, or in microplastics or in a stand-alone article. The discussion is here. EMsmile (talk) 03:24, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: I have now consolidated everything in plastic soup and we are now discussing a new name for that article. Please go to the talk page of plastic soup if you'd like to contribute. EMsmile (talk) 12:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Update: the article that used to be called "plastic soup" is now Marine plastic pollution. EMsmile (talk) 22:32, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which article should have the bulk of information about microplastics in oceans?