Talk:Severe weather

message: I am going to start working on this article again after a long wikibreak. Won't make any major changes for awhile except for some copyediting that I will do on my namespace. KnowledgeRequire (talk) 23:19, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Was the order of the content/structure of the article ever fixed/resolved?  Thegreatdr (talk) 01:21, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so...The RfC I filed for the structure recieved some input, but not enough to really determine what should be done. What about if in sections 4 through 8 we just make the current level 3 headers into level 2 section headers, and merged the Lightning section with the Thunderstorm Development section as a section "Thunderstorms"? Ks0stm (T•C•G) 18:34, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure we can find some alternatives, though from our past attempts, it might be best to remove some of the irrevelant contents that we(mainly me)added. KnowledgeRequire (talk) 03:22, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Which content is irrelevant? Ks0stm (T•C•G) 04:12, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If a specific phenomenon is not considered severe weather by any source, such as heat wave and cold wave, it is best reserved for the extreme weather article.  If there are sources which support those phenomena as severe weather, they need inline references to support their location within this article.  Thegreatdr (talk) 15:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe so, but I was thinking of switching the focus of the article to severe weather systems, rather than its phenomena. It would make the article coverage a lot more concise. The current length of the article is already pass normal Wikipedia article size. KnowledgeRequire (talk) 22:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has about 7500 words, which is 2500 words shy of the preferred article limit, so it's not too long yet.  Whatever you all decide.  I have no preference.  Thegreatdr (talk) 02:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time to start working 

message: 1) I archived most of your talk page. Hope this helps.
2) I used your Weather portal to establish the content outline. A couple of sections had to be inserted based on best guess.
3) Some of the material in the individual sections has been distributed to the associated Main article talk page for incorporation with those pages.
4) There are numerous CE comments that I hope will provide stimulation.
5) I added a comment banner to each section to help editors focus.
This was a challenge and after 12 hours, I hope you like the results. Happy editing Bullock  ✉ 04:07, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy Edit comments 

message: This article still needs a lot of work. References are severely lacking: not necessarily in number, but in appropriateness. I have found at least two references so far which do not support the facts they are purported to support. Several of the phenomena listed on this page are not severe weather by any definition I am aware of (clouds? really???), and several sections have no content save a link to the main article on their subject. 
I believe this article is an ideal case for summary style writing. I don't like the layout as of now; there is too much overlap between the concepts of "storm" and "precipitation" to have separate sections like this. I think the best way to separate would be "summer severe weather" and "winter severe weather", since these are relatively well-defined, with an "other severe weather" section to cover various "severe" (as cited by an official source!) phenomena which do not fit into those categories.-RunningOnBrains(talk) 23:54, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a quick note: when i reorganized your page I used the "storms" and "precipitation" sections of the weather guide on the top of the page. Clouds, Rain etc. do not fit your topic and should be removed they are bits of legacy information that I did not remove in the CE. I recommend that you keep the structure parallel with existing tools. Tighten up the sections, further reduce the redundant information. Unfortunately you got a CE who checks the weather on the "weather rock" out side, if it's wet it must be raining....With all the information that I moved out, the page's intent is clearer, I expect great things. I'll be back and look in later. Bullock  ✉ 09:30, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Next step 

message: If we're going to use a summary style format with this article (which we have been anyway), there's no good reason for a cloud or extreme temperature section.  The extreme temperature information was moved into the extreme weather article since the past year of edits and referencing continue not to indicate heat and cold waves as severe weather, merely extreme weather.  While one could argue you can't have thunderstorms without clouds, clouds in an of themselves are not severe weather.  However, I can see the thunderstorm section staying, since the shorter fused severe weather is connected with that phenomenon.  The lead is going to need expansion, because right now, it cannot stand alone as a summary of this article, which violates the MoS (Manual of Style).  Thegreatdr (talk) 12:46, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clouds and extreme temperatures are gone from this article 

message: Thegreatdr seems to know the difference. I don't. What is it?
If one lives in south eastern Australia, a heat wave is what leads to the bushfires that kill hundreds of people. I consider that severe. HiLo48 (talk) 13:01, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: We have wildfires in this article as an example of severe weather, so your point is taken.  We (as a group) have not been able to find any references calling consecutive days of extreme temperatures severe weather.  The phenomenon was extreme, but not severe apparently.  Wikipedia requires there be sourcing which defines certain phenomena as one thing or another, so when no sources were found to call head/cold waves severe, the decision was simple.  The information was removed from this article and placed within the extreme weather article.  Thegreatdr (talk) 13:58, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Severe vs extreme weather 

message: Most of the sections are well-referenced, except for the dust storm section.  Additional references may also be needed ranking the damage from various forms of severe weather against eath other in the cause section.  Once these items are done, and the current format is considered reasonable, a GAN run would be in order.  Thegreatdr (talk) 00:34, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have an issue with the inclusion of "nor-easter" and the omission of Blizzard. Blizzards are clearly severe weather; they should get a section. The Nor-easter thing is not such a big deal, just we need to note that they are not necessarily severe, but they can still produce major precipitation, wind, and storm surge. For that matter, what about storm surge; not just for hurricanes you know ;). I believe this should have a section, since it can be produced by tropical and non-tropical systems alike. I'm not sure this article is as close to ready for GA as you think it is. -RunningOnBrains(talk) 01:39, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In order for storm surge to be included, we need to find a source that says it is a type of severe weather.  We know it is damaging and has killed thousands over the centuries, but without a source stating it is a type of severe weather, it can't be included.  If someone is able to do that, we can include information relating to extratropical storms/nor'easters/European wind storms/tropical cyclones and storm surge.  Blizzards are in this article, but they don't have their own subsection right now.  If this is a significant problem to other editors of this article or within this project, it could be resplit off as a subsection.  Thegreatdr (talk) 09:55, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

text: *I might add myself that European windstorms and Nor'easters are local terms for Severe extratropical storms and should not be separate sections as if they were a class on their own. They should be mentionned as exemples in a Severe extratropical storms sub-section on the high winds and on excessive precipipitations sections. Pierre cb (talk) 11:51, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *This merger has occurred.  Since we have now had a couple opinions stating a similar thing here, maybe all of the threat sections should have a subsection for all of the weather-related systems which could cause them.  This would create a bit of repetition among subsection names. Thegreatdr (talk) 18:45, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lingering issues before GAN 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Severe weather. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090312094655/http://www.andthensome.com:80/weather/hail.htm to http://www.andthensome.com/weather/hail.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:16, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Severe weather. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to https://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/DPS/Meetings/Wshop-SEEF_Toulouse2004/Doc3-1(1).doc
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100329221032/http://oea.larc.nasa.gov/PAIS/Windshear.html to http://oea.larc.nasa.gov/PAIS/Windshear.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120813214806/http://www.erh.noaa.gov:80/cae/svrwx/downburst.htm to http://www.erh.noaa.gov/cae/svrwx/downburst.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091020071219/http://www.weather.com/blog/weather/8_10843.html to http://www.weather.com/blog/weather/8_10843.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090825020946/http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/winterstorm/winterstorms.pdf to http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/winterstorm/winterstorms.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Severe weather. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/DPS/Meetings/Wshop-SEEF_Toulouse2004/Doc3-1%281%29.doc
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.erh.noaa.gov/cae/svrwx/downburst.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090506002006/http://www.ofcm.gov/slso/pdf/slsochp2.pdf to http://www.ofcm.gov/slso/pdf/slsochp2.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090227073206/http://weathereye.kgan.com/cadet/flood/about.html to http://weathereye.kgan.com/cadet/flood/about.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.avalanche.org/moonstone/TAR/avi%20review%20articles/Of%20Wet%20Snow%2C%20Slush%20%26%20Snowballs.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120317011535/http://www.em.gov.au/sites/schools/Getthefacts/Heatwaves/Pages/default.aspx to http://www.em.gov.au/sites/schools/Getthefacts/Heatwaves/Pages/default.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 15 external links on Severe weather. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/68bsChh6S?url=http://www.ucar.edu/communications/factsheets/winds.html to http://www.ucar.edu/communications/factsheets/winds.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070205124033/http://www.cswr.org/dow/dow.htm to http://cswr.org/dow/DOW.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130716172215/http://mattcuttsalerts.com/tornado-warnings/ to http://mattcuttsalerts.com/tornado-warnings/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141219103329/http://www-frd.fsl.noaa.gov/mab/microburst/micro_course.html to http://www-frd.fsl.noaa.gov/mab/microburst/micro_course.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081217175139/http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/search?id=squall-line1 to http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/search?id=squall-line1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070817224959/http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/search?id=prefrontal-squall-line1 to http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/search?id=prefrontal-squall-line1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606103620/http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/search?p=1&query=bow+echo&submit=Search to http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/search?p=1&query=bow+echo&submit=Search
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080924175030/http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/search?id=line-echo-wave-pattern1 to http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/search?id=line-echo-wave-pattern1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606102146/http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/search?id=heat-burst1 to http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/search?id=heat-burst1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080620115657/http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/search?p=1&query=waterspout to http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/search?p=1&query=Waterspout
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071017213229/http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/search?id=adiabatic-process1 to http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/search?id=adiabatic-process1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606103908/http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/search?p=1&query=Hailstorm to http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/search?p=1&query=Hailstorm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606085246/http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/search?p=1&query=Flash+flood to http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/search?p=1&query=Flash+flood
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131105140621/http://www.noaawatch.gov/themes/coastal_inundation.php to http://www.noaawatch.gov/themes/coastal_inundation.php
*Added  tag to https://www.osac.gov/Reports/report.cfm?contentID=95454
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090531073015/http://www.fesa.wa.gov.au/internet/upload/716567526/docs/flood.pdf to http://www.fesa.wa.gov.au/internet/upload/716567526/docs/flood.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:10, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:22, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: I removed the following from two sections, as - mostly - the material did not seem to me to fit into topic of "extreme weather". If they should go back in, I would suggest improving the expression, which I would be happy to help with, if needed.
* From "High Winds" section:
 
From final section: 
* == High humidity and low humidity ==
Also the second para of "Causes" section, had been truncated here. I put back the deleted material. AukusRuckus (talk) 02:58, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weather phenomenon not in scope