lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bryopsida

message: The german article states clearly that Laubmoose is the same as the class that is scientifically named Bryopsida. --Etxrge (talk) 14:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They are using a different classification of mosses.  Their page includes the Polytrichopsida within the "Laubmosse", so it is not the same as Bryopsida sensu Buck and Goffinet as outlined here on the English Wiktionary.  The Germans are following a system unique to German literature, and which is not followed on any other Wikipedia.  Also, the German article on Laubmoose links to Moss, not to Bryopsida (or at least it did until you went and changed it). --EncycloPetey (talk) 18:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Out of 15 orders listed as belonging to Bryopsida in English Wikipedia, 10 are listed as belonging to Laubmoose in German Wikipedia. Also, the German article links to Bryopsida in Commons. Thus there are differences in delineation, but the bulk of the species correspond. Certainly, Laubmoose is the closest we get. (Given the discrepancies, maybe the article text should be less firm.) The argument that the german article linked to moss is highly inappropriate, since that linking was obviously incorrect.--Etxrge (talk) 08:33, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Verifiable statements of fact are never "inappropriate". --EncycloPetey (talk) 18:29, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: de:Laubmoose

message: Here EncycloPetey states that there are many meanings of Bryopsida. If this is true the article should be changed to describe all the commonly held variants. --Etxrge (talk) 11:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  There should be a section in this article that explains other former uses of the term "Bryopsida".  It should point to the articles that treat those other meanings.  For instance, when the bryophytes were considered to be a single division, the mosses were called Bryopsida.  But note that this should be done in a discrete section.  The article should not try to cover all the possible meanings, or it will be a mish-mash of many different topics, most of which already are covered on other pages.  --EncycloPetey (talk) 18:25, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Many meanings
Talk:Tom Higgins (footballer)

message: Twice before, it appears, this article was moved from "Tom Higgins", for disambiguation (such as to "Tom Higgins (sportsman)", and twice it was reverted. 
Please do not revert this article to "Tom Higgins" again. There is no justification for leaving the undisambiguated title "Tom Higgins" pointing to a stub about a north American football player and coach. Contrary to the myopic perception of a few north American sport fanatics, the rest of the English speaking world does not revolve around north American sports people, especially in the sport American football in which almost nobody else has even a scintilla of interest. Such people are in global terms nonentities, arguably not even notable enough to be covered by Wikipedia at all; they are certainly no more notable for Wikipedia inclusion purposes than artists, other sports personalities, and other moderately public figures who happen to have the same name! 
It is unclear to me whether previous contributors who attempted to move "Tom Higgins (footballer" to a disambiguated title went on to create the proper "Tom Higgins" titled disambiguation page with other entries. I have made a start on that, although there is only one other Tom Higgins fully written up in Wikipedia itself. There would nevertheless appear to be more than enough other people of this name of at least equal notability to be mentioned in an encyclopaedia of this kind, to ensure that no careful Wikipedian would claim that the best course for the future was not leaving "Tom Higgins" showing the list of people with that name which I have created containing seven such people.
Iph 12:38, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation of this person name
Talk:Anonymous pipe

message: i must say that i find it a bit laughable that an article on pipes goes into detail about the windows implementation of the matter and lists unix in the references section only.
yes it was laughable. I've added a stub section linking to the main Pipeline (Unix) article JonathanWakely (talk) 00:48, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Hi,
I was wondering, the article says anonymous pipe are for simplex communication between two processes, and, from what I understand, the article wants to mean that when you create an anonymous pipe, only one process can read an end and only one other process can read the other end. But is it really true ? I don't know what POSIX says about this, but on Linux, anonymous pipe are working on a "half-duplex" mode, if I can say. Both processes can write on the "write end", both processes can read from the "read end".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.135.245 (talk) 01:27, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is simplex means half-duplex here ?
Talk:Tanzi District

message: This is poorly written.  I will try to fix it up a little, add information as I can find it, and introduce sources if I can.  I will also take photos and include them as well.  I work in Tanzih Township, so the photos are pretty easy to take care of.  ludahai 魯大海 (talk) 23:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly written
Talk:J. B. West

message: In the book "Inside the White House" Ronald Kessler says that the secret service investigated missing plates and determined it was because West was letting family and friends in for unofficial tours. He says they also determined he was homosexual and they believed that made him more likely to be blackmailed or otherwise influenced, so he was "dismissed" instead of simply retiring on his own.  Ywaz (talk) 21:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homosexual and fired?
Talk:J. C. P. Williams

message: Hi , responding to your revert of my minor edit. I unlinked "New Zealand" as a nationality in the first sentence of the lead as it doesn't add anything and it looks untidy. In fact, as per 1.2.2 of Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking, it's deemed inappropriate in the situation of widely known nationalities and countries. As per my understanding of those guidelines, I only really permit it in the case of obscure countries (e.g. Benin or Palau) or where the link clarifies the nationality in instances where it could commonly be confused (e.g. Republic of the Congo vs. Democratic Republic of the Congo). I have no problem with Wellington, New Zealand being linked at the start of the first section, because it's far less prominent to international audiences and linking it makes sense. Using examples of high standard New Zealand bios like Edgar Kain, Dave Gallaher or Alfred Shout (all featured articles) or high profile NZ bios with years of constructive editing, such as John Key or Peter Jackson, we see that the highest standard is not to link this within the first sentence. Thanks --Jkaharper (talk) 00:40, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlinking concerns
Talk:Stoke, Cheshire East

message: I have proposed merging in Barbridge, which is a small settlement within Stoke CP. The current article on Barbridge contains only a (four-figure) grid reference in addition to the place's existence, and I fear that duplication of effort in maintaining two short articles on the overlapping topics is going to be inevitable. Please discuss the proposal here. Espresso Addict (talk) 12:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Propose merging in [[Barbridge]]
Talk:Fine topology

message: Changed redirect to Fine topology (potential theory) from Comparison of topologies. The rationale is that there is a difference between "fine" and "finer" and that while it makes sense for "finer topology" to the comparison of topologies article, it is more useful for "fine topology" to point to the potential theory article. I'd be happy to settle for a disambiguation page here if there is disagreement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mistercupcake (talk • contribs) 14 August 2007
: It is hard to believe that some perverse mind managed to spoil an admirably convenient coarse–fine opposition, refined from an ambiguity of "weak–strong" and having (in English) a memorable connotation to final object for "fine". Can it be true that any of potential theorists did not give a timely advice to cancel that silly "fine topology" and rename it to something else? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:18, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirection target
Talk:Center for Computation and Technology

message: This page had been heavily edited by an account called CCTPR, implying that they are affiliated with the CCT.  The article was beginning to read like a press release, rather than an encyclopedia entry.  Some of the information included in the previous versions of this page could be edited back in, but with care so as to avoid the appearance of "white-washing", or the like. kmccoy (talk) 23:15, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Adrian Gunnell

message: Re:"to qualify for the final stages of the event played in his home town for the first time":
2007 was the first time the UK Championship had been played in Telford. Had a ranking event ever been played in Telford before, or was this the first time Gunnell had qualified for the UK Championship?--MartinUK (talk) 11:18, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Telford
Talk:Communist Party of Ukraine (Soviet Union)

message: It's hard to tell what that article is about, but I think it's the same as this one. —Michael Z. 2007-08-14 23:16 Z
:No, they are two separate parties. There is a lengthy explanation on ukrainian wiki, it would be good if someone savvy in Ukrainian could help translate some material. --Soman 07:07, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In Ukrainian Wiki Communist Party of Ukraine and Communist Party (Bolsheviks) of Ukraine is one party, one article.--Юе Артеміс (talk) 22:35, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Congratulation for joining back Crimea to mother Russia from your brothers and sisters in the Communist Party USA .--Evensacornevensacorn (talk) 27:30, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Ukrainian Communist Party]] 
Talk:Valijagate

message: Valijagate gets far more GHits than maletagate, and is named in the news media, while maletagate seems to be used more often in blogs. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:21, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Periergeia indicated on my talk page that valijagate is the more popular term now; does anyone object if I redirect this page to Valijagate?  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:21, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Basically, maleta is more Venezuelan and valija is more Argentinian. I've also heard "maletíngate". Main "valijagate" with "maletagate" redirecting seems to be the best option according to ghits. JRSP 17:03, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I'll do that, since the Argentine word is getting more press play.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:27, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: This article and Maletinazo are about the same incident. JRSP 04:35, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this is the right way, move contents there and replace this with a redir. the policy/guidelines should be at Help:Merging and moving pages. JRSP 05:05, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's there (thanks)!    So if others agree, shall I do it tomorrow or the next day? Basically it's a cut and paste, but has to be well labeled. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 05:10, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think it is obvious both articles are about the same subject so I don't think anyone will disagree with the merger. JRSP 05:14, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's probably still better to wait a bit, so no one feels left out of the discussion, leading to possible reverts.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 05:16, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeap, we can wait a couple of days. JRSP 05:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If others weigh in by tomorrow, I'll go ahead and do it then.  I've been looking at the text, and there's not much to save there, but maybe we can get rid of the WP:PROSELINE problem here.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 05:28, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

text: OK, that's 3 out of 5 involved editors, so I'll put both articles in use and do the merge now.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 07:12, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Bernese Jura

message: I'm not sure if it is a good idea to have different articles for the regions in the same canton unless the parent article (Canton of Berne) becomes too large, which is not actually the case. I did the same remark for Bernese Oberland. Zacharie Grossen (talk) 18:06, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: no importance. Zacharie Grossen (talk) 18:56, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bernese Jura and Canton of Berne 
Talk:Two Trains Running

message: "It was first performed at the Walter Kerr Theatre on Broadway in New York City on April 13, 1992. It was also performed at the Huntington Theatre in Boston in the fall of 1990."  Chronological problem here.  First performed in 1992, but also performed in 1990?  Then wouldn't it be first performed in 1990?  Martinwk 23:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  first performed 
Talk:Orion abort modes

message: no, this article is not completely out of date
in a picture of a recent NASA .pdf document there is also a third option: a Soyuz-like retro-rockets land landings
we can't know if this option will be adopted until the definitive Orion design will be released
this is the August 2007 official NASA document with the image of the Orion land landing using retro-rockets:
http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/185978main_Cx_PEIS_draft.pdf
the Orion landing image 2-21 is at page 2-54 of the NASA document (or page 122 of the .pdf reader page counter)
but the same NASA document has also a SURPRISE about the Ares-V !!!
just look at the image 2-15 (page 2-29 of the NASA document or page 97 of the .pdf reader page counter) and see atop the Ares-V drawing...  :) :) :)
Gaetanomarano 10:00, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  august 2007 NASA document 
Talk:Wagga Wagga railway station

message: Congratulations to whoever accused me of being a vandal for changing the next station to The Rock, as Uranquinty has been closed since the 1990s (see ). Why is Junee listed as the next up station?? That should have BOMEN as the next station as there is still a building there!! Somebody in the WWW (talk) 05:30, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Uranquinty
Talk:Toblerone line

message: First off, is the page ONLY about the toblerone rocks, or the entire rocks AND forts defense complex?
And can I add all of this:
"The Promenthouse Fortification line, more commonly known as the Toblerone line is a 10 km long defensive..."
"...defenses are similar to the shape of the Toblerone chocolate bar, which gave its name to the line, while the original name Promenthouse comes from the river along which it was built."
"The line includes twelve fortresses. The two forts closest to the Route Suisse road were disguised as normal houses to avoid scaring tourists. The most well known being the "Villa Rose" in Gland, which was transformed into a museum and opened to the public in 2006"
Sources I guess:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPL9-L2gwzo
https://www.sincerahues.com/toblerone-trail-in-switzerland/
I rather ask than be accused of adding nonsense.--2A00:EE2:907:FF00:38D4:8B26:5ECE:7876 (talk) 00:05, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can I add this stuff?
Talk:Swiss chocolate

message: The lead section sentence should be rewritten.  First, grammatically it doesn't really make sense.  Second, I don't think swiss watches and machinery really need to be mentioned in the introductory line for Swiss chocolates.  Itsmeiam (talk) 21:37, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been improved.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.54.203.120 (talk) 11:55, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead section

message: Italians claim the swiss learned to make chocolate from their masters in Turin (Torino). 82.131.210.163 (talk) 21:26, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Any reliable source citation for that strange statement? -- JoannaSerah (talk) 18:29, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italian job
Talk:El Cajon Boulevard

message: Just out of all this argument; whether the route is a BL or not; should an infobox with the I-BL shields be added? --PCB  02:02, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox? 

message: The infobox for the article needs improvement, so it can display on the page. Also, a "|carries=" line that reads  should be added to that line, so it will show the shield and name (with link) of the roadway. Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 17:15, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox improvement 

message: https://www.cbs8.com/article/news/local/petition-circulates-to-have-andrew-jackson-post-office-in-san-diego-renamed/509-d826b541-5895-47e0-8134-397c64824082
https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/petition-calls-for-name-change-at-andrew-jackson-post-office-in-rolando/2351966/
https://timesofsandiego.com/politics/2022/11/19/rep-sara-jacobs-introduces-bipartisan-bill-to-rename-rolando-post-office-after-ex-san-diego-rep-susan-davis/
https://www.10news.com/news/local-news/san-diego-news/biden-oks-renaming-of-rolando-post-office-after-former-rep-susan-davis
https://www.sdjewishworld.com/2023/07/07/ceremony-renames-andrew-jackson-post-office-for-susan-a-davis/
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-07-06/rolando-post-office-susan-davis
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Andrew_Jackson_Station.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Susan_A._Davis_Post_Office_plaque.jpg
Please update. I have to declare a conflict of interest. -Erik Anderson Kire1975 (talk) 06:45, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andrew Jackson Post Office on the Boulevard was renamed recently
Template talk:Sigma Chi

message: Would "Sweetheart" necessarialy go under "publications?" —ScouterSig 18:16, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I actually don't remember why I put it there. I saw it listed under publications for something else but I can't remember where or for what. Acidskater 20:44, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Placement
Talk:Johnny Horizon

message: I placed Johnny in the 1982 disestablishments category because that's when the law protecting the character was repealed, but any one know when he was last used by the BLM? Caerwine Caer’s whines 00:10, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Johnny was later used by the Tennessee Valley Authority under BLM license when that agency was responsible for the Land Between the Lakes National Recreation Area.  I do not think that he has been used there since the responsibility for the area was transferred to the United States Forest Service.  2600:1004:B14F:C56D:DCD0:229E:94CB:8C9F (talk) 23:08, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Last Use?

message: ...in 1972:
http://www.gocomics.com/peanuts/1972/03/08
A2Kafir (and...?) 15:39, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a reason for that: the Bureau had arranged for Snoopy to partner up with Johnny for the cause, and was using him in brochures and such starting in 1971. You can see coverage of it here. I would add some Snoopy information to this article, but I have a WP:COI when it comes to Peanuts. I encourage someone else to add material based on that article. --Nat Gertler (talk) 00:59, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peanuts referenced him once
Talk:Ongjin County, South Hwanghae

message: 37.6761° North 125.0888° East and two islands north of it seem nameless in all sources, but what are their names? could anyone add this data here?Undead Herle King (talk) 08:30, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! --Amble (talk) 19:50, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: NAMELESS ISLANDS!!!
Talk:Weston, Cheshire East

message: The new history by Charles E. S. Fairey is available from Weston Village Shop, Englesea Brook Methodist Chapel & Museum and Nantwich Bookshop, or by contacting the author; see . Espresso Addict (talk) 20:47, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: New history
Talk:Sons of Gwalia

message: Is 'Cost per ounce' the production cost or should it be 'Price per ounce'?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wodawik (talk • contribs) 09:32, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Cost per ounce as it is the cost to produce one ounce of gold. Calistemon (talk) 10:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production section
Talk:Moldova–Romania relations

message: Forked from Foreign relations of Moldova apparently --W.marsh 00:14, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does Bucharest currently recognise the existence of an independent Moldovan state with no provisos regarding a future merger or not? I have been reading contradictory reports and had hoped that this Wikipedia article would help me, but it is quite unclear. YusufAlBinVeryNaughty (talk) 14:31, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status of curent recognition 
Talk:Rick Bognar

message: Not Rick Titan.99.149.167.252 (talk) 21:57, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  It was Ric Titan 

message: Someone put a link about Bogner's cause of death being a heart attack.  The article said the cause of death is unknown. Also it had a Facebook link which I went to and it was a dead link. It was removed or taken down probably by false information. Its a misconception saying that he died of a heart attack. Surely he could have died of a heart attack especially at the age of 49 but no reliable proof. Could be a suicide, overdose or some other health issues. What was the official cause of death for Rick Bogner? Please use reliable sources. Kingzwest (talk) 02:45, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of Death
Talk:FieldCraft (company)

message: The title does not follow the WP's naming conventions.  Fieldcraft is most commonly used as a military term and not this vendor  -- Wikipedia:Naming conflict.  I propose creating a disambiguation page and giving this page a new, related name, such as FieldCraft (company).  Comments?  -- Ctatkinson 00:23, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
Category talk:Mobile phone standards

message: I've started a massive recategorization of the pages and subcategories of this page.  All mobile telecommunications standards pages should be identified as either a 3GPP standard, a 3GPP2 standard, or other.  Only if it is a non-3GPP and non-3GPP2 standard should it be in this category.  Otherwise, the page should be put somewhere under 3GPP or 3GPP2.  Put the page in the 3GPP parent-level or 3GPP2 parent-level categories only if the standardized feature crosses multiple network types within 3GPP or 3GPP2.  Otherwise, put the page in the appropriate sub-category.Mojodaddy (talk) 20:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Nathaniel Rich (merchant adventurer)

message: I'm not clear about the connection of the Bermudas Company mentioned here, and the Somers Isles Company. Charles Matthews (talk) 19:17, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The ODNB clarifies the matter and points to Somers. I guess BC was in the vernacular. --Tagishsimon (talk) 09:31, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dody Wood

message: After reviewing the article on Dody Woods, I am able to answer the following three questions:
Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Although there are few references in this short article, the references are reliable and appropriate to what kind of information was given on Dody. Ex., all his hockey states were referenced from hockey databases.
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? It is apparent that the author was unable to find any information about Dody's life besides his hockey career. I feel that his hockey career was over-represented and his life external to hockey was extremely underrepresented.
Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? There are no found biases within the article. The information was presented in a factual tone. The author held no position on the article and did not present the research in a biased way.
Briannemacpherson (talk) 04:15, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled