Talk:KV64

message: I created KV64 with a title Kv64...too bad.
So I put a redirection page. My job here today is complete.
Sandeepmdas 09:27, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Start

message: Below is a communication from Zahi Hawass ...
:"In a letter to USA TODAY, he writes, 'If what Mr. Reeves says is true, then why didn't he present this report to the Supreme Council of Antiquities.' He adds: 'Radar can also show anomalies that are not necessarily tomb shafts. It seems to me that Mr. Reeves wants publicity more than conducting his work through a scientific approach. For this reason, I am writing you to state that the information is not true.' 
Should this article exist ?
Markh 07:46, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There are tons of articles (and rightly) on Wikipedia that deal with false information and with information that is officially denied.  That is not even mentioning articles on fictional topics.  The truthfulness of a topic is not a reason for inclusion or exclusion.  Its notability is.  The anomaly currently known as KV64 is certainly notable, and therefore should have its own article, which presents an accurate, NPOV picture of the situation, including the reaction of authorities such as Zahi Hawass.  --Cromwellt|talk|contribs 18:10, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official line 

message: This line seems unclear to me:
:"Nicholas Reeves[3] and his team believe that since the anomaly is situated in a part of the Valley that was out of bounds to earlier excavators probably right from antiquity,"
Should this read "a part of the Valley that was inaccessible to earlier excavators"? If not, in what way was it out of bounds?
--Pharillon 07:33, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify "out of bounds" 

message: The name "Reeves" appears in the article without any previous explanation.  It is only when we reach the second section of the article that we discover a) that his name is Nicholas Reeves and b) that he is the leader of the team who discovered the anomaly and later published the findings.  According to style, we should have his full name early in the article, followed by his last name in all other instances.  We should also find out why his name is mentioned in the same sentence as the first mention.  --Cromwellt|talk|contribs 18:13, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reeves 

message: The article says that "[Reeves] had alerted Hawass and the Supreme Council as to KV 63's location in August 2005" except the KV63 article says that it was discovered AND announced earlier. Uncompetence (talk) 06:53, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time Citation Flaw? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on KV64. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/feedarticle/10042363
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:48, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on KV64. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081010060352/http://www.nicholasreeves.com/item.aspx?category=Comment&id=81 to http://www.nicholasreeves.com/item.aspx?category=Comment&id=81
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100621113057/http://www.kv-64.com/ to http://kv-64.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:39, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified