lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Noun phrase

message: http://www.tesol-direct.com/guide-to-english-grammar/nouns-and-noun-phrases  explains it to some extent although they are not correct on data  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.113.91.38 (talk) 17:52, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  plurals 

message: It'd be great if the example in the first box actually worked 
"Those five beautiful shiny Arkansas Black apples sitting on the chair" is a noun phrase of which apples is the head. To test, a single pronoun can replace the whole noun phrase, as in "They are delicious".
«They sitting on the chair.»? Umm no. This demonstrates the opposite of what is being argued… the long noun phrase cannot be replaced by a single pronoun. Perhaps the original "sitting on the chair" should just be "are delicious"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.171.144.116 (talk) 07:22, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken example 

message: The section "Status of single words as phrases" seems to imply a false dilemma. Either a single word (a noun or a pronoun) is a (noun) phrase, or it isn't. But a better way to think about this is that the test for what's a noun phrase is not to do with how many words it contains, but whether it can be nested. A single word that's a noun *can* be a noun phrase, since that can be nested. A single word that's a pronoun cannot be a noun phrase since it cannot be nested. So, the word count in a phrase is the wrong way to think about this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.165.103 (talk) 19:42, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  False dilemma 

message: User:Birbal Kumawat, you want to add a lot of material, for example in this edit, notably:
:In our modern grammar no other theorist but Geoffery [sic] Leech has ever been able to give Noun Phrase a clear-cut and comprehensive look. The Palgrave Macmillan Press has the everlasting prestige for publishing Leech’s “English Grammar for Today” that gives a clear-cut and the most comprehensive explanation to such basic units of grammar as word, phrase, clause and sentence.
This is misguided on so many levels that I hardly know where to start. What is "our modern grammar"? By "Geoffery Leech" I suppose you mean Geoffrey Leech. In an encyclopedia you don't award prestige, let alone "everlasting prestige", for anything. I've no doubt that Leech explains these basic units of grammar well; so does (for example) The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, and I'd be surprised if the Comprehensive Grammar by Quirk et al (which I don't know well) doesn't do as well. 
Now, just what is it that you want to add? Please get consensus here for adding it. -- Hoary (talk) 09:43, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Praise for Geoffrey Leech, etc
Talk:List of World War II ship classes

message: I removed this class. No offence meant but the list is intended for fighting ships and an oiler - even a naval one - is not built to fight. Inclusion of classes of support ships, landing craft, etc would make the list even more unwieldy than it is and also subvert its purpose. It may be good to start a new one for such vessels - the idea has potential. Folks at 137 (talk) 15:21, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and have removed it. I sugegst that we set up a "list of support vessels classes of World War II" or similar and probably for clarifiaction rename this one to a similar form with "combat" or "warship" in the title. I note also the Kyototu Maru article needs work. GraemeLeggett (talk) 11:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kyokuto_Maru_Fleet_Oilers
Talk:Broadcasting in the Soviet Union

message: The lead image of Valentina Leontieva looking intently to the right, off into space, drawing our attention away from the article, to the edge of our computer monitor, is a good example of "image facing" (see image style guidelines) -- and how not to face an image (peoples faces should be turned looking into the text). However, very rarely, there comes a time when it's artistically appropriate to stare off into empty space at nothing, and this article might be that singular case in a thousand. I hope it was purposeful and not an accident, it sends a powerful message about the subject matter. --Stbalbach 23:41, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not put the image there, sorry.  Can't help you out. -Daniel Blanchette 01:52, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Image faceing

message: Would need some citations. - Francis Tyers · 16:39, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article
Talk:Patsy Gallacher

message: This article was created by someone in the midst of a vandalism spree. It may well be total B.S. Feel free to nominate it for deletion if there is nothing here that can be saved.--Srleffler 23:39, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

message: The image currently illustrating this article, :Image:Patsy Gallacher.jpg, has possibly dubious source and copyright information which has been challenged, and may be deleted. If anyone has infromation on the actual source and photographer of this image, such information would be appreciated. Also, if anyone knows of alternative sourced and free licenced images of the subject, please share that information. Thanks, Infrogmation 13:53, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Hans Wehr

message: For further and more accurate information see German wiki. - th.kohl  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:FB:E713:9B00:CD5E:485F:10F:7A05 (talk) 10:35, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strongly onesided and biased article 

message: Given that many Arabic students and teachers accross the English-Speaking world (I can't speak for German students) refer to the dictionary itself as 'Hans Wehr' - "I hope you've all brought your Hans Wehrs to class today?" - with all due respect to Wher's biography on this page, short though it is, I have added a top link from this page for those who land on this page, like I did, looking for the much more extensive information provided in the article on the Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic by the same author. Madeinsane 21:00, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's my 'Hans Wehr' 

message: Why is the word "the Arabs" in quotation marks? Can someone explain the reason?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.75.135.34 (talk) 19:25, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Arabs
Talk:Shannyn Sossamon

message: Where did anyone spot her in the Da Funk video?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktPHIqW2sxs —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.132.162.97 (talk) 13:20, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: could be her leaving the bar at 5:05 here youtu.be/mmi60Bd4jSs  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.4.89.249 (talk) 10:41, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Da Funk 

message: IMDB has her date of birth in 1978.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.111.81.41 (talk) 21:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Age

message: Didn't she name her kid Audio Science, or something simularly odd? You'd think that would make a mention here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.153.121.72 (talk) 01:24, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A good article re: Audio and Mortimer.  https://pimiso.com/mortimer-sossamon-and-audio-science-clayton-shannyn-sossamon-kids Ipebblecrusher (talk) 20:44, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Her kid

message: Article contains this text.
This debate does not belong in the body of the article, but I'm not qualified to correct the article.
Undiscovered was a box-office and critical failure, but Kiss Kiss Bang Bang performed well at the box office, grossing more than $17,000,000 and was significantly praised by critics Wiki entry for kiss .. bang states the film grossed about 15 million net. Please cross check and verify..  -          Article corrected
user:shoka not logged in  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.130.24.186 (talk) 13:22, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs review

message: She has an unmentioned third tattoo on her lower back. It appears to have a word and possibly a pair of eyes, but I am unsure of the details.
:Please sign your posts (wp:sign). -- Narnia.Gate7 (talk) 14:05, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not important -- Narnia.Gate7 (talk) 14:05, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Third Tattoo

message: Why do she and her sister have different surnames? It would make sense that, both being born within their parents' marriage, both sisters were 'Lindberg', and subsequent to their divorce Sossamon made the decision to use her mother's surname whilst her sister didn't; why would their elder daughter be given the mother's maiden name and the younger be given the father's surname?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.207.34 (talk) 15:33, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth Name
Talk:Andranik Margaryan

message: The English transcription of Armenian words is needed here instead of a transliteration. Please move the article to Markarian. Thank you.
:There is no reason to use the "Markarian" spelling. Most of Armenian sites use "Margaryan" themselves, for example Margaryan's official site itself : . Eastern Armenian (the only form of Armenian language official in the Republic of Armenia) has a pronunciation different from Western Armenian spoken by the diaspora from the Ottoman empire. In Eastern Armenian, գ is pronounces rather "g" and կ is rather "k". In Western Armenian, it's the contrary. The name of every Armenian citizen must be transcribed following the Eastern pronunciation. Švitrigaila 11:23, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have created a redirect page at Andranik Margarian because apparently there are two ways of spelling the name in English (see Washington Post for the alternative spelling) --Ghormax 11:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Margaryan, not "Markarian"
Talk:Dr. Gonzo

message: Since the literary connotations of this page refer directly to the name's usage by Hunter S. Thompson, perhaps it should be merged with the article about the writer himself.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Grammar nazi (talk • contribs) 
:Dr. Gonzo was Oscar Acosta, not just a figment of HSTs imagination so it would make more sense to merge it with the article on him instead. However I'd prefer it to be left seperate so the connection between HST, Oscar Acosta and gonzo journalism (an important one) can be made clear. - Drrngrvy 02:24, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been "dabbed".--Rockero 22:49, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:ThreadX

message: This article needs to be expanded and written in better english. --Shell 00:14, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: Also, the articles talks about "Deeply Embedded". I don't see the term explained in Wikipedia.
192.114.175.2 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 09:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  deeply 

message: All links to rtos.com now redirect to azure.microsoft.com, and in most cases the original page has been removed instead of being moved over. . Please see Help:Using the Wayback Machine for instruction on fixing this. 
Timeline:
* 27 March 2005: Typical 2005 website, but they were definitely featuiring ThreadX.
* 05 March 2019: The website is a lot more flashy, but they were still featuring  ThreadX. 
* 18 April 2019: Same as before, but now they have a notice: "EXCITING NEWS! Express Logic Joins Microsoft!! Today, we are very excited to share that Express Logic has been acquired by Microsoft. Effective immediately, our ThreadX RTOS and supporting software technology, as well as our talented engineering staff join Microsoft."
* 29 May 2020: Now there is a large "Azure RTOS is now available from Microsoft" popup.
* 03 November 2020: And now the site is dead, redirecting to a Microsoft page.
--Guy Macon (talk) 17:26, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  rtos.com
Talk:Game physics

message: The phrase "game physics" has another sense in referring to liberties of physics taken to allow a better game design. For example, almost all platform games allow the player to change direction in midair. This is of course impossible in real life, at least in the fashion it is seen in games. In other words, it's the equivalent of the term cartoon physics, though not the same thing (different laws apply to game physics than cartoon physics; true cartoon physics is uncommon in games). Should this sense be noted in the article? - furrykef (Talk at me) 13:02, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another sense 

message: Computer animation physics or game physics involves the introduction of the laws of physics into a simulation or game engine, particularly in 3D computer graphics, for the purpose of making the effects appear more realistic to the observer.
This doesn't seem an accurate definition (if you can even call it a definition).  It reads to the effect that "game physics" means the endeavour to reproduce the physics of the real world with the aim of achieving realism.  I disagree with this: surely game physics are the laws of motion that apply within the world of a particular game, regardless of how true to the real world (or not) they are.  And why in 3D computer graphics in particular?  Surely it applies equally to 2D and 3D game worlds, and moreover the graphics and the physics modelling are entirely separate from each other.
OK, so later in that paragraph:
Additionally, games may intentionally deviate from actual physics for gameplay purposes
Does this mean additionally to implementing game physics, or as an aspect of game physics that is additional to aiming to achieve realism?
I might have a go at rewriting this.... — Smjg (talk) 20:11, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition
Talk:Prétear

message: Why aren't the other characters (Kei, Goh, Mannen, Hajime, Shin, Kaoru, Natsue and Mayune) listed? They should at least have an honorable mention or something. They're all factors in the story, no matter how minor. R e i k a 03:52, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article only lists the major characters here. And the others are mentioned in the plot. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:53, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just don't understand why the minor characters can't be listed as well. Not much information is needed for the profiles of the minor characters, so it shouldn't take up more than a couple of paragraphs worth. Actually, I came here to confirm some information on Kei, only find his profile deleted, and I don't trust fansites since Wiki is usually more accurate. R e i k a 04:06, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because they are minor characters and in the articles current shape, it was putting too much plot information in the article. If you want to see the previous entries, you can look at this older version of the article, but it has a lot of OR and just bad stuff in it. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 04:17, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I see. Okay, I think I understand now. Thanks for clearing it up. R e i k a 04:28, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now restored the entire character list. It needs cleaning up, but the ability of shorter series to have a separate character list is being challenged, so this one may not get to get a split. :( -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 17:28, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters 

message: Most of the plot elements of the article need refocusing on the manga first, rather than the anime. I am finally getting a chance to read the manga, so I'll be completely rewriting the plot section based on it, rather than the anime. The character section also needs to be redone, so that the characters as they appear in the manga are noted first, then differences in the anime noted at the end with the voices. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 17:28, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: Just a quick note: the Japanese is not a dub, so I'm not sure why it's consistently called that in the text? It's the original language. A "dub" in this context is a re-recording of the audio track of a work, usually in a different language. I hope someone gets a chance to fix this. Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.93.47.157 (talk) 23:10, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dub"
Talk:Jesus Army

message: I guess the article ought to reflect Noel's death. An anonymous editor attempted to do so by editing a source, but that is surely the wrong way to do it! I've flagged up Noel's dates, but some better change would be helpful. John Campbell (talk) 14:48, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not apparent to me how the article in its current state needs changing. It's not about Stanton and I suspect it will take a while before the history books can talk about the changes in the group which likely have followed his death. We can only write what we have sources for. Daask (talk) 00:31, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noel Stanton (1926-2009) 

message: Soon after moving to Northampton,I learnt that the Jesus Fellowship are sometimes known as the Bugbrooke Community. This is implicit in the article rather than explicit.Vorbee (talk) 21:39, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Daask (talk) 00:29, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Bugbrooke Community

message: The subject of this article is the Jesus Fellowship Church, which has for a few decades publicised itself under the name Jesus Army. However that name is no longer in use, so most continuing references to 'The Jesus Army' are now perhaps misleading. I propose this is addressed by changing the title of the article to 'Jesus Fellowship Church' and replacing all references to 'Jesus Army' except quotations, JA specific items and a reference to the name change, as for all intents and purposes the information in this article now relates to what is now known as Jesus Fellowship Church.
An example of how this continued name-duality is confusing: the line "the Jesus Army has a comparatively high proportion of young members" - well the Jesus Army no longer exists as an appropriated identity, so "they" don't.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aidanashby (talk • contribs) 11:53, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change from Jesus Army to Jesus Fellowship
Talk:King's Head Inn, Aylesbury

message: I have found some pictures here. Do you think it's appropriate to for Wikipedia?--Sennaista 00:43, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: One assumes those images are copyrighted.  UK law on copyrights is very different to US law. -- Francs2000  01:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Paul Martin Sr.

message: This image has been tagged as lacking a valid non-free content rationale for a long time. Absent a valid rationale it is likely to be deleted. If you can do so, please add one. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 18:02, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Paulmartinsr.jpg]] lacks a non-free content rationale 
Category talk:Insects

message: I'd like to propose that subclasses and infraclasses not be used in the category structure - they end up making too many small subcats, and deepen the hierarchy excessively. A "flat" category of insect orders would be quicker for navigation, especially if you recognize "flies" or "blattodea" but are unsure of what "exopterygota" includes today. Stan 00:51, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I fully agree. I'd just had the same idea. --Stemonitis 13:24, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved all the categories for the orders into :Category:Insects, but at the same time, I've left the old hierarchical system in place for the time being. --Stemonitis 13:30, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:WTCN-CD

message: For preferred GFDL compatability, here is the page history for the time it was on the WTCN disambiguation page before the split to here: (note that some did not pertain to the WTCN-CA elements)
*(last)  14:26, September 22, 2005 24.61.119.222 (I have relocated WTCN-CA to a new page)
*(last)  18:24, September 5, 2005 JLaTondre m (disambiguation link repair (You can help!))
*(last)  14:06, September 3, 2005 68.223.186.99
*(last)  23:55, August 14, 2005 Blueboy96
*(last)  23:55, August 14, 2005 Blueboy96
*(last)  02:08, June 22, 2005 Susvolans
*(last)  19:41, January 18, 2005 Mulad
*(last)  19:30, January 18, 2005 Mulad
WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: == Factual accuracy dispute ==
I'm concerned about 's recent edits to this article. His refrences cannot be proven (there are no links to any articles), and I've never heard of it being a WB affiliate before 2005, which is how the station website states it. Can anyone possibly do a little research, and confirm if the refrences at the bottom of the page are indeed true? —Whomp t/c 22:32, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: WTCN had been airing Kids' WB programming before 2005, but they've only been a full WB affiliate for one season (2005-06). -- M (speak/spoken) 14:40, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I talked to , and he said that The Palm Beach County Library, where he says he gets the imformation and refrences, allows its patrons password access to NewsBank, which is probably some database. According to him, it is not availible online or the general public. He did say that the refrences are true, though. He mentions that he also added information to WWHB, WEAT, WLDI, and WFTL. Sam 21:11, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: I'm concerned about 's recent edits to this article. His refrences cannot be proven (there are no links to any articles), and I've never heard of it being a WB affiliate before 2005, which is how the station website states it. Can anyone possibly do a little research, and confirm if the refrences at the bottom of the page are indeed true? —Whomp t/c 22:32, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: WTCN had been airing Kids' WB programming before 2005, but they've only been a full WB affiliate for one season (2005-06). -- M (speak/spoken) 14:40, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I talked to , and he said that The Palm Beach County Library, where he says he gets the imformation and refrences, allows its patrons password access to NewsBank, which is probably some database. According to him, it is not availible online or the general public. He did say that the refrences are true, though. He mentions that he also added information to WWHB, WEAT, WLDI, and WFTL. Sam 21:11, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual accuracy dispute
Talk:Newman College, Melbourne

message: With its lush Quadrangle Newman College is also one of the few places in suburban Melbourne that the native animal, Rattus norvegicus foras induviae can be found. 	 
		 
It is believed that the triac was discovered by a student while residing at Newman College
The Brown Rat originated in China and is a pest. If you meant a different animal, please find the right link.
The TRIAC is an electronic component, "TRIode for Alternating Current". If you meant something else, please find the right link.
pfctdayelise 00:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ugh. Why does an encyclopedic article on a historically interesting building need a trivia section anyway? Is it some Newman injoke, about the rats and the TRIAC? Whatever. I'll continue to remove the TRIAC comment until a source is cited. See WP:CITE and WP:V. pfctdayelise 02:45, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

text: They have their place, Schgooda, but let's have a sense of proportion, you know? Like, it might be nice to have a few things like a list of deans, major financial supporters, famous alumni... before we worry that the rats get their place. Anyway, I look forward to seeing what improvements you can make to it! pfctdayelise 05:52, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed material

message: To the person who keeps adding the stuff about the current administration: I'm going to assume for the sake of argument that the stuff you're trying to add is sincere.  You will need to rephrase it in a way that reflects a NPOV and is verifiable.  Otherwise, it's just slander.  -- De Guerre (talk) 05:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rumours about the current administration