Talk:Man-hour

message: There is no doubt that Man-hour is a phrase with sexist connotations.  It can refer to many kinds of work, regardless of the gender of the worker.  However, the term itself refers specifically to the "man" aspect.  An over-sensitive person might even suspect that the term implies that women are incapable of work; however, that is mere speculation.  The inherent sexist implications are not.  Citation not needed to back that up, thank you.  Sorry for bothering you. ^_~ Nagyss 23:00, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: About other languages it should noted the German :de:Personenstunde and the Spanish :es:hora-persona.--86.125.186.250 (talk) 12:23, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexism in the phrase 

message: It is not a sexist term, now 'gender-challenged' my pro-speak way of naming the woman gender, is debatably offence to women.
Supersonicjim 06:36, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RIDICULIOUS! 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support as usage. Change English usage, then Wikipedia. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:02, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: The sentences in the lead about researching and writing a college paper seem inappropriate.  Calculating man-hours to complete a specific task refers to a team approach.  Using man-hours in the context of completing a college paper implies a team, rather than an individual, effort.  Does anyone mind if I delete these sentences?  Please discuss.  Thank you.  Respectfully,   Tiyang (talk) 11:09, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Lead 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Man-hour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131102011213/http://www.wabo.boku.ac.at/uploads/media/raupe_pnw99_e.pdf to http://www.wabo.boku.ac.at/uploads/media/raupe_pnw99_e.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060722155057/http://www.onr.navy.mil/02/matoc/05_09/solicitations/docs/05-0002-02.pdf to http://www.onr.navy.mil/02/matoc/05_09/solicitations/docs/05-0002-02.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041230063731/http://ifptelocal32.com/CA/Report%205.htm to http://www.ifptelocal32.com/CA/Report%205.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:44, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. Unanimous oppose, with no recent updates. In line with previous two discussions. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ASUKITE 02:03, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Man-hour →  – Trying this again as, if this would be based on ghits it seems like the latter has more results now since 2013, so it's now this site lagging behind the trends... 92.0.5.48 (talk) 10:06, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 September 2021