lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Enamel lamellae

message: The bulk of the old paragraph refers to the enamel itself, rather than the enamel lamellae, and so I think does not belong here (there is already an article on the enamel).  Furthermore, it seems to be a copyright violation of http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=16190512&dopt=Abstract...the content, though it is published on a US government website, does not appear to be a publication of the US government (publications of the US government are in the public domain) but rather the abstract of a research paper written by a couple of Hungarians.  Your Beloved Uncle Jimbob 02:02, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice catch. There's one problem that I have, though. The Medline dictionary defines lamella as "(1) : one of the incremental layers of cementum laid down in a tooth  (2) : a thin sheetlike organic structure in the enamel of a tooth extending inward from a surface crack". So, in this context, it appears that the lamellae aren't the actual cracks, but rather the tissues extending from these cracks. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 02:06, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there a dentist in the house?  Your Beloved Uncle Jimbob 02:11, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for crashing the conversation, but I have consulted my dental histology textbook.  Enamel lamellae and enamel tufts are similar to one another.  They appear as dark lines arising from the location where enamel and dentin meet.  Tufts look like short branches.  Lamellae traverse from the junction of the enamel and dentin through the whole enamel.  Specifically, it says lamellae "consist of linear, longitudinally oriented defects fill with enamel protein or organic debris from the oral cavity".  Neither tufts nor lamellae are associated with increased risk to tooth decay.  Though the image is not magnified, you can see both tufts and lamellae in the picture I had taken. In the thin layer of enamel, you can see bundles of short dark branches and also individual lines crossing the entire layer.  Those are enamel tufts and lamellae.- Dozenist talk 02:40, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Oh, and one more thing, I added a closeup picture here. - Dozenist talk 03:01, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for explaining that, I don't have any real knowledge of the field. Would you mind correcting the stub to reflect this information? ˉˉanetode╦╩ 03:17, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Whereas enamel tufts are found at the DEJ and extend into the enamel, lamellae extend predominantly from the enamel surface inward into the enamel, but I supposed can be vice versa as well.  The chief distinction is the linear vs. branched architecture of the defect.Histology Course Review Notes, New Jersey Dental School, 2003-2004 DRosenbach (Talk | Contribs) 22:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lamellae vs. tufts
Template talk:Adventure Path

message: The update to Mordenkainen's Fantastic Adventure, Maure Castle (that's a redirect to Mordenkainen's Fantastic Adventure which contains both the orginal and the new module) could arguably go here, but if it did, it would change the character of the template. I'm thinking that perhaps there should be sections with the first section being the typical usage of "Adventure Path", listing the recent, 12-issue series. And then, the next section, titled "Other series", could include this and perhaps some of the other 3+ installment paths? -Harmil 02:02, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maure Castle
Talk:Rolling Fork, Mississippi

message: I deleted the part about Muddy Waters because he was actually born in Issaquena County. ~staple_gun, resident of Rolling Fork. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.240.45.183 (talk) 08:17, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted him again.  It's pretty well-documented he was born in nearby "Jug's Corner" in Issaquena County. Richard Apple (talk) 19:13, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The name of this place seems rather peculiar. Could someone explain where it comes from?
Franciscus montmartinensis (talk) 17:03, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: According to this source, it is named "Rolling Fork" because of the swiftness of the water at a fork in the creek there. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:48, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name?
Talk:Jiang Tingxi

message: this is ssssooooo boring go do something else-</small>==  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.109.10.103 (talk) 07:46, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  all 
Talk:Jigme Lingpa

message: an IP user inserted 'alleged' to make it clear that reincarnation is
not an uncontested fact.  While this is certainly true, I have opted for
'according to tradition'. It is incontestable (i.e. not 'alleged') that  Buddhism holds to a view of reincarnation, and Tibetan Buddhism in particular with the tradition of tulkus; irrespective of whether or not such belief is
'fact' in the scientific sense. Zero sharp 21:08, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: alleged vs. according to tradition

message: Changed:
"*Dudjom Rinpoche and Jikdrel Yeshe Dorje. The Nyingma School..."
To:
"*Dudjom Rinpoche Jikdrel Yeshe Dorje. The Nyingma School..."
Reason: Dudjom Rinpoche and Jikdrel Yeshe Dorje refer to the same person.
Sherabgyatso (talk) 00:29, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change in Reference part

message: The subtitle "Career" is maybe not as appropriate a description as "Biography", 
for example, which is used in other similar pages. Other suggestions are good. If there's no objection, I'll edit it. Thanks Pasdecomplot (talk) 12:26, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subsection name
Talk:Joan van Broekhuizen

message: What does the phrase "was born to simple parents" mean? Why "simple"? [User:140.180.171.121|140.180.171.121]] 05:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It means they weren't noble or rich, just ordinary folks, but with no implication of abject poverty.  If you would like to re-word it, go ahead. --Slashme 06:43, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Simple parents
Talk:Joan Derk van der Capellen tot den Pol

message: The article title is "Joan van der Capellen tot den Pol" but in the article the name is "Joan van der Capellen tot den Pol".  I am going to change the article text to Pol as that seems correct. Ann arbor street (talk) 03:52, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title versus name 

message: How can he have 'played a prominent role' in the establishment of the Batavian Republic that didn't appear until ten years after his death? 217.35.132.93 (talk) 15:10, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Anachronism
Talk:Johann Bernhard Bach

message: needs more info.....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.119.107.126 (talk) 20:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The claim needs a source (some "known name" and all that), but I'll agree having just heard several movements from the G major suite on the radio, that Telemann is a name they bring to mind :) Schissel | Sound the Note! 02:32, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Telemann - yes
Talk:Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach

message: Please see .
I could not find this cantata mentioned in the article. --Yoavd (talk) 10:21, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Look again; it's listed under "Vocal works/Arias, cantatas and incidental music" as "Pygmalion (Wf XVIII:5)". -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:58, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. --Yoavd (talk) 08:01, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pygmalion, cantata for bass & orchestra, HW18/5 

message: An article about his Wachet auf, ruft uns die Stimme should have which title? "(Bach)" would be unique but misleading, but all his given names are long. "(motet)" might work for a while, until we have the next one. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title question 

message: Please see: Talk Page for J.C.Bach
Two Concertos, (C minor and G major), listed as “Spurious/Doubtful” in the J.C.F.Bach catalogue, have been definitively shown to be by J.W.Hertel and G.A.Benda, respectively. Mia-attributed to J.C.Bach on a 1960s recording. Doelrich (talk) 22:16, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mis-attribution of Harpsichord Concerto recording
Talk:List of Martin Mystery episodes

message: :Please help me write summaries to this page. Dylan Damien 02:12, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More information

message: i will covert this to Episode list format to comply with wikipedia gudeliens on tv show lists, all informaiton iwll be retain teh enemies will eb amde part of hte summary as it not really required as a serperate coloum--Andrewcrawford (talk - contrib) 23:13, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coverting to episodelist
Talk:Johann Friedrich Fasch

message: I'm listening to his Overture Suite in G, and it sounds quite Handelian to me. They were contemporaries. Was there any connection between them? Did one influence the other? 2604:2000:F64D:FC00:A84F:7D69:FD78:6245 (talk) 06:15, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any connection with Handel?
Talk:Johann Friedrich Schweitzer

message: I found a notable reference for the fact he was reputed to have transmuted lead into gold. It is on pages 27 and 30 of (Walter Lang’s introduction to) Fulcanelli’s “Le Mystère des Cathédrales”.
https://archive.org/details/FulcanelliMasterAlchemist/page/n15/mode/2up
Alfy32 (talk) 10:39, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation for his alchemical transmutation
Talk:Johann Georg von Eckhart

message: According to our article on Beringer's Lying Stones, he wound up discredited and his access to the library was cut off, so that his research remained incomplete at his death. Whether this is true or not, the article fails to say anything about the aftermath of the hoax affair. Yngvadottir (talk) 21:53, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrediting needs to be covered
Talk:Johann Jakob Wettstein

message: Anybody has a clue why there's an out-of-date template at the top of this article? Are there any recent developments on Wettstein that should be taken into account? Classical geographer 07:53, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Something about his biography not being published yet, see here. Seems to be gone already. #29 (talk) 07:59, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Out-of-date template
Talk:Nonextensive entropy

message: I am wondering if we should simply redirect to Tsallis entropy? Any opinions?--Smcgrother 02:19, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The redirect might be a good idea. Do you want to go ahead with the merge? --HappyCamper 16:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, maybe I should mention why I did not put the content in Tsallis entropy here...there are other definitions of nonextensive entropy in the literature, although by far, most people equate "nonextensive entropy" with "Tsallis entropy". So, for this reason, the merge is probably a good thing to do. --HappyCamper 16:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: At the moment the article says: "Entropy is considered to be an extensive property, i.e., that its value depends on the amount of material present. Constantino Tsallis has proposed a nonextensive entropy, which is a generalization of the traditional Boltzmann-Gibbs entropy."
Certainly thermodynamic entropy is extensive in classical thermodynamics, however it's not true at all that Gibbs entropy needs to be generalized in order to become nonextensive. Gibbs entropy is extensive for extensive systems, and non-extensive for non-extensive systems. Gibbs' 1902 book carefully treated both cases in full generality.
Is it possible that the term "nonextensive" has a nonstandard meaning in this article? If so it might be good to clarify that, and to make the opening discussion of the article focus on the conventional meaning.
Nanite (talk) 14:03, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extensivity
Talk:Kunio Maekawa

message: I would support merging Kunio Mayekawa into Kunio Maekawa. They are definitely the same person. While it does seem that this architect sometimes used the aberrant romanization "Mayekawa", the majority of mentions of him in English use "Maekawa", which is proper romanization in modified-Hepburn. Per WP:COMMONNAME, the two should be merged under "Maekawa". Michitaro (talk) 02:29, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, they are the same person. References to "Mayekawa" are often found in older publications and I support merging them under "Maekawa". Kenchikuben (talk) 16:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged per above. --ELEKHHT 08:54, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:History of mass spectrometry

message: This article needs more narrative to add to (or replace) the time-line. Also more references. Feel free to pitch in. --Kkmurray 21:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Narrative format 

message: Alfred O. C. Nier played an important role in the development of mass spectrometry, but isn't mentioned in this article. I think we should add him somewhere in the Manhattan section. Ydon (talk) 19:08, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Alfred OC Nier

message: Is it accurate to call Kaufmann's apparatus a mass spectrometer? I could only find sources that claim that the 1912 parabola spectrograph experiment done by Thomson was the first instance of a mass spectrometer (parabola spectrograph being another name for it)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:630:301:5242:4070:3295:BA5C:FBD7 (talk) 21:00, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Kaufmann, 1901
Talk:Raf Simons

message: "Raf Simons is believed to be a vegetarian"
Well, that doesn't really sound like it should be in the article, does it? I'll delete it, the "citation?"-thing isn't enough.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.247.60.9 (talk) 15:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vegetarianism 
Talk:Oleanna (play)

message: I didn't know this was originally a play until I saw this article. -- 129.19.93.1 02:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of the movie 

message: Current state of article is a mess--I've reverted recent changes several times, but another contributor continues to add author's bio, numerous headings, and character analysis--the appearance is that of a term paper slowly being grafted onto the original article. What's there now is essentially two separate articles, one piggy-backing the other, without regard for WP:MOS or proper sourcing. I have attempted to discuss the editing on the user's talk page, to no avail. Appears to be, especially given the username, a WP:ownership issue. Help would surely be appreciated. JNW (talk) 22:42, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent changes

message: I can't contribute to this page but it is problematic. The second paragraph is pretty much lifted from reference [3] http://mamet.eserver.org/review/1994/Oleanna.html . I don't think it works to lift whole sentences intact, string them together, and append a reference to each one. --Gentlemath (talk) 14:12, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Work 

message: I found the recent changes by an anonymous editor very interesting. I wrote the original plot summary. While intending to be completely neutral, I am a man and perhaps that is reflected in my description. I may inadvertently be more sympathetic to John (although I think most would agree that Carol is truly the less sympathetic character in the play—blame Mamet). The new changes seem to flip to a feminist perspective. It's often subtle, for example "Carol is even more forceful to name her instructor's flaws" becomes "Carol tries to educate him in his position of privilege and power, forcing him to recognize the fact that his desires and hatreds all center around obtaining and losing power over others." I may have inadvertently been non-neutral, but it appears to me that the new changes are not either. Can we get someone who is neither a man nor a woman to settle this? ;) Fnordware (talk) 20:16, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In that one example at least, the original sentence is definitely more neutral. Just change it back. 24.70.45.226 (talk) 07:13, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, changes made. Hopefully this compromise between the two versions is more neutral than either of the originals. Fnordware (talk) 18:03, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral Point of View
Talk:Johannes Hardenbergh

message: I found that photo on commons.  It was not identified where it was.  A similar house is a B&B is at http://ww1.bbgetaways.com/wc.dll?ddm~SelectDistance~NY~Hyde_Park~20  Its caption says it was built by a grandson.  Does anybody have details? Thanks. Americasroof (talk) 03:31, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this his house?
Talk:John Adair (surveyor)

message: Due to the Library of Congress he died on 15 May 1718. Also in other sources the year 1718 occurs. -- Jesi (talk) 08:54, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death 
Talk:John Bacon (sculptor, born 1740)

message: First, the EB11 didn't cite them, it merely referred readers to them (similar to our #Further reading sections). Second, they should only be listed once they are being used to verify facts in the text of the article:
*
*
 — LlywelynII 02:55, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for future article expansion
Talk:John Bird (astronomer)

message: The body text of the article and the ref states this person was a "Scientific instrument maker", not an "astronomer". Looks like the title should be changed. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 16:09, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Astronomer?

message: I believe there is a huge content gap in the area of his early life, only mentioning where he was born, but nothing more. Also was he educated? There is no information in regards to his education or lack thereof, it simply dives straight into his life's work.Ashtonnd33 (talk) 18:17, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Education and Childhood?
Talk:Lynn Yaeger

message: |blp=yes}}
Went to Alfred G Berner High School in Massapequa Park (Long Island, NY) with Lynne Yaeger.  Her year of birth is ----.  18:39, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

message: The link for "Column Contest Winners 2008" doesn't mention Yaeger anywhere. I'm adding tags for more references/sources. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 04:08, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Template talk:Annapolis Group

message: This template takes up a lot of space.  Could you please pipe the names of the institutions as to omit the word College/University.  You could look at any number of other similar templates as an example.  Thanks, -MrFizyx 02:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Great idea. I went ahead and shortened most of the names - though I had to leave "college" or "university" in some places when schools shared the same name or when removing them left the identity of the college a mystery. Thanks for the feedback. -Classicfilms 06:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, thats much better. -MrFizyx 14:50, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  template size 

message: I changed Connecticut College's listing to its full name. The state's public university, the University of Connecticut, uses the name "Connecticut" for sports teams. Local Connecticut residents would always think "Connecticut" alone means UConn.  So I made this change to avoid confusion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.119.72.119 (talk) 03:44, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conn College 

message: I have added colors -- they are not "arbitrarity decorative" but are the colors used at http://www.collegenews.org/theannapolisgroup.xml. --King of the Arverni (talk) 22:51, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colors
Talk:John Clarke (dean of Salisbury)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved. An error (mine) prevented the uncontroversial technical request to move this page. I am correcting it now. See general discussion below. --John Cline (talk) 21:38, 10 October 2021‎ (UTC)  207.161.86.162 (talk) 23:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: John Clarke (Dean of Salisbury) →  – In line with the principle of WP:BISHOP. 207.161.86.162 (talk) 03:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:05, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 October 2021
Talk:John Collins (Continental Congress)

message: @User:Randy Kryn: John Collins is considered a Founding Father by whom? Since you didn't add a citation, we have no way of knowing. So please apply one so we can discuss what your source is and then what other sources have to say. Allreet (talk) 09:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @User:Randy Kryn, according to WP:VER, "Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed." Thank you. Allreet (talk) 01:43, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

text: My error. The above should be directed to @User:Civil Engineer 3, who made the unsourced edit and is now being alerted. Allreet (talk) 01:47, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute title Founding Father
Talk:John Custis

message: I improved the article a while ago and am glad (but puzzled) it reached good article status a year ago, apparently through the efforts of people more familiar with British terminology than American. I had planned to add a simple mention in the "death and legacy" section about one of his plantations now being within York River State Park, but, frankly couldn't, given the article's current state, which only mentions his property holdings in Northampton County, the town/city of Williamsburg (which BTW is near York County) and Antigua. I took out some passive constructions as well as references to "constituencies" as I have never heard that term used in an American context, colonial nor modern. However, I don't have time to check all the intervening changes, most of which are only for a few bytes. Today I noticed his legislative service was under "early life" and the heading "political career" started with a discussion of the odd relationship with his first wife, and ended with a discussion of his gardening, so I changed the first header to "early life and education" and the latter to "career". Nonetheless, the article still now seems chronologically challenged, not only because the Antigua messy inheritance by his first wife was not resolved in his lifetime. This man's acknowledgement of his son by an enslaved woman is mentioned in the article under the "later life and death" heading, while his marriages are mentioned sideways in the next section "personal life, family and legacy". To me that makes little sense, so I write here urging fewer passive constructions and more logic (such as he had two marriages and also acknowledged fathering a child by an enslaved woman, but the boy died before his father). I also changed the misleading infobox which appeared to have him born in Arlington, Virginia, which is several hundred miles away from his actual birthplace, Arlington plantation in Northampton County (on Virginia's Eastern Shore). The current Arlington, Virginia was named in part to honor the old Custis plantation, as well as the powerful British Lord Arlington who lived many decades before the American Revolutionary War.Jweaver28 (talk) 00:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  more work needed
Talk:John Egerton (bishop)

message: I removed the section relative to the case of Thomas Bowles as WP:OFFTOPIC for the following reasons.
# The 19th century DNB did not even mention the case
# Beyond the fact that Egerton appointed Bowles in 1766, he seems not to have been involved in answering the legal challenge, which did not begin until 1770, two years after he had moved to another position
# No reference was given to show that Egerton was called to give evidence
Three paragraphs dealing with the course of a case in which his involvement stopped with the original appointment therefore seemed unjustified. It can be dealt with in a single sentence. Sweetpool50 (talk) 13:08, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welsh language controversy