Talk:Turbo: A Power Rangers Movie

message: I would tend to disagree with the fact that many fans cite this as the Jump The Shark moment for PR. Any issues with it being removed? JPG-GR 17:17, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Jumping The Shark

message: :Image:Turbo a power rangers movie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Turbo a power rangers movie.jpg

message: There is a huge section about the differences between the show and the movie in the article about the MMPR movie. Something similar could be added to this article. For example, I've always been wondering why Zordon looks so different in the movie. 77.47.6.23 (talk) 01:10, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Differences

message: Turbo: A Power Rangers Movie aired on Cartoon Network some time ago. I had hoped, in petitions, that the rest of the franchise would air on Cartoon Network, but now that I have been informed that the franchise has been renewed, and the series will soon air on Nickelodeon with new episodes, this makes this film the only Power Rangers program to air on Cartoon Network. I don't know if it's possible, but could someone add this piece of Trivia to the article?
~~LDEJRuff~~ (see what I've contributed) 0:59, 16 May 2010 (EDT)
:WP:TRIVIA. JPG-GR (talk) 06:47, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excuse me for pointing this out... 

message: Both AFI and British Film Institute call this film an American film. AFI indicates that the film's copyright holder is Saban. Does anyone have any details that supports that this was a proper co-pro with Toei and not, say, something symbolic, or that Toei was sub-contracted?  I know nothing of this subject. There is this copyright record that indicates Toei owns part of the copyright. Do we have anything else? We may not need it, I'm just curious. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:50, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  American–Japanese co-pro? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Turbo: A Power Rangers Movie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6Xlt3qH93?url=http://www.youngartistawards.org/pastnoms19.htm to http://www.youngartistawards.org/pastnoms19.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I just realized that the critical reception has only one review. We may need to add some more reviews from sources such as The New York Times and Variety. Thoughts? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 09:22, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It currently has four reviews but it seems unbalanced and unduly positive for a film that was panned by critics. -- 109.77.195.51 (talk) 16:21, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical reception