Talk:Doctor Who – Battles in Time

message: (Or grammer, or however you want to spell it)
Reading through this article, most of it just doesn't feel grammatically correct. I don't know what it is. Possibly all the bullet points, and not enough explanitory sentences to go with them. Needs fixing, anyway.--Ninty 21:20, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Completely agree. I have made some dramatic changes. Please tell me what you think. Flutefluteflute 08:58, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Great start. Could you do the same to Doctor Who Adventures? --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 09:13, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar

message: For what it's worth - we subscribed to the magazine and back-ordered from the website, and have received nothing 5 weeks later, yet the funds were taken from our credit card on completion of the various forms.  There's also no contact information besides a postal address.  Issues are 
appearing in the shops, but not on our doorstep.
Even if they have been having demand issues, besides being incredibly naive, they should put some information up that everyone, especially customers can read.
If you're condsidering it, for entertainment (not collection/ebay reasons) then I'd suggest you steer clear for now.
I've been getting the magazines with very little hassle. Are you perhaps too far away for the magazines to reach? 82.32.48.236 14:21, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Battles in Time website 

message: :Image:Special battles in time.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Special battles in time.jpg

message: Is the Abzorbaloff really the next issue? The anon editor whose added it says that it's in the back of the Carrionite issue; but that one isn't out for another two weeks! Does anyone else know anything about this? --OZOO (vote saxon) 20:09, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abzorbaloff? 

message: The comic section was taking up too much space so I cut it down to the basic information and gave it a main artical of its own.--Wiggstar69 10:15, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Comic Section 

message: I only own up to issue 19 aince my local shops stoped selling the magazine, i've ordered them online but they have not come yet, if anyone has the issues 19 and onwards please could you, in the same fashon I have complete the comic stories on the Battles in time comic page that I havn't done yet. Wiggstar69 09:48, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issue 20 and onward for the Comic BIT page 

message: A new pack named 'Invader' will be available on wednesday 5th of september, this set will be based on the charicters seen in the 2007 series, (series three) and will include 225 new cards.[2]
The cite is for issue 22.
I've gone through issue 22 (Abzorbaloff issue) and it says nothing about 5th of September or 225 new cards. Unless the original editor made a typo and it is a later issue I haven't recieved yet, I don't think this is right...
:Online there are sevral sites saying its 225, but unless it says it in the issue we should hold back.--Wiggstar69 09:17, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invader 

message: someone on ebay is selling super rose invader golden ticket! Is this correct? Can someone tell me? Rose isn't in series three so why would they repeat it making it less rare? surely the invader golden ticket is something else entirely??? if so WHAT? if anyone knows please reply. many thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.240.25.229 (talk) 21:54, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  invader golden ticket 

message: :Image:Battlesintime01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 09:59, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Battlesintime01.jpg

message: Could someone please tell me why all the links and #'s have been removed from the issues sections? Also, why was the "The magazine" section missing, until I restored it? Thanks, --OZOO 18:34, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: When i got joyful adipose, its intelligence was 9300, more than the doctors! Why is that?
I have no idea. It's likely an error. Mine is the same. --213.83.125.225 (talk) 12:40, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Joyful Adipose

message: This focuses on magazines mainly and i believe there should be a lot more information on the cards. The main reason i belive the magazine was made was BECAUSE of the cards. You could get the cards seperatly and everything. Does anyone think more info on the cards should be added? --213.83.125.225 (talk) 12:40, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: More info on cards