Talk:List of tornadoes causing 100 or more deaths

message: Sorry,hi
 I meant to leave a more detailed edit summary of the chocolate tornado but I pressed Enter by accident. What I was going to say was, the article quotes some guy from UCAR in saying there is uncertainty as to whether it was a single tornado or a family. However, saying there is uncertainty is not the same as saying there is debate; pretty much all scientists agree that it was a single tornado for the majority of its path, including Tom Grazulis, probably the foremost authority on historic tornadoes, in his book Significant Tornadoes 1680–1991; as well as Chuck Doswell, one of the foremost authorities in severe weather in this presentation, which quite unfortunately is a dead link and the archive does not seem to be working. It is listed over and over and over as the deadliest single tornado in US history by authoritative sources and without caveats.
It is quite remarkable, the completeness and consistency of the tornado damage path (shown in this other piece by Doswell; unfortunately he does not repeat the claim that it was clearly a single tornado). It is also quite impressive that they have managed to reconstruct the path so completely from historical data. The data is in stark contrast to most other historical tornado paths of over 100 miles, where gaps in the damage are long and there are areas where damage is suspected to be non-tornadic. Unfortunately the online sources are spotty, but Grazulis is quite clear in his book that the Tri-State Tornado was almost definitely a single tornado (summarized here on his website, and this seems to be the general consensus of the scientific community. I feel I have made a significant case to change the wording back to how it was; any objections? -RunningOnBrains(talk) 04:40, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not from me. Thank you for the thorough explanation. Sounds like the media is confusing uncertainty with debate. TimL (talk) 06:35, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tri-State Tornado 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on List of tornadoes causing 100 or more deaths. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110515204603/http://www.spc.noaa.gov/faq/tornado/killers.html to http://www.spc.noaa.gov/faq/tornado/killers.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:40, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of tornadoes causing 100 or more deaths. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070814075710/http://www.torro.org.uk/TORRO/research/whirlextreme.php to http://www.torro.org.uk/TORRO/research/whirlextreme.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of tornadoes causing 100 or more deaths. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090202102711/http://www.phenomena.org.uk/waterspout.htm to http://www.phenomena.org.uk/waterspout.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:54, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article, 1996 Bangladesh tornado, refers to a 1996 tornado in Bangladesh which killed over 600 people. However, the citations in the article seem to be unclear on whether this toll was from a single tornado or a tornado outbreak. Should this tornado, or information on this outbreak, be added to this page? It is possible that the article linked is simply wrong about the event as it is written by one user and seems to contain some errors.
 MCRPY22 (talk) 03:46, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  1996 Bangladesh Tornado 

message: The revision reflecting that the Tri-state's record has been superseded (aka broken) is premature to say the absolute least.  First and foremost, is because the question of whether it really was ONE tornado and not a family is still being evaluated by the NWS survey team.  Secondly, and this ties back into the first point, the survey is still ongoing and remains incomplete; Until the National Weather Service officially announces/verifies this fact, it remains unconfirmed.  This is further supported by the fact that the article covering the December 10 - 11th outbreak states that it remains unknown as to whether it was one tornado or a family.  Again, until such time as the Weather Service confirms it...you are jumping the gun.  Given this is a meteorological event, the go-to authority for sources is NOT the standard media channels from other events, we are to rely on information provided from the National Weather Service instead, and according to the latest from them...the prevailing opinion is that Quad-State was a family of tornadoes.  So, once again...reverting back to the November version of the article.  Please do not change it back to reflect quad-state's questionable existence, without a citation from the Weather Service.
GokuSS400 (talk) 00:52, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quad State revision