Talk:Operation Infinite Reach

message: The problem not settled, so 911 could succeed.   Maybe should have a critise chapter in this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lynxlea (talk • contribs) 01:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cruise missile strikes is it too weak? 

message: The page on the US Embassy Bombings says 212 PEOPLE were killed at Nairobi, INCLUDING 12 Americans.  This page says 224, INCLUDING 12 Americans.  Having made a serious study of parallel errors in other contexts, my money is on there having been 212 killed in all; I could cite other instances in which a number like this has been swollen by having one component added twice.  In other words, reporting too many is a more probable type of error than reporting too few.  Still, I note this in the hope that someone with more ready access to first-hand sources will correct it and save me the trouble of digging.  (I always say that.  It hasn't happened yet, but hope springs eternal.)
Terry J. Carter (talk) 23:33, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bring Out Your Dead 

message: I'm not sure this belongs here: 
Notable Misinformation
On November 1st 2011, Condoleezza Rice stated these attack were targeted against Iraq and as lending legitimacy for the Iraq War during her interview segment [25] on The Daily Show. No such attacks were launched at that time.
Also, this seems to have been posted in response (under the wrong subsection). 
Does anyone else have an opinion on the suitability of this content for this article? KConWiki (talk) 04:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Condoleezza Rice on Daily Show 

message: It would be great to use this article for information about the strikes and al-Shifa in particular. GABHello! 01:44, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  CW in al-Shifa 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Cruise missile strikes on Afghanistan and Sudan (August 1998). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.library.cornell.edu/colldev/mideast/sudbous.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:18, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The section declaring the attacka a failure and an al-Qaeda propaganda victory is subjective opinion and not neutral POV.
It doesn't matter if a source also gives that opinion--plenty of people have opinions--that's not a neutral fact that belongs in an encyclopedia.
If nobody wants to rewrite it objectively, it should be removed,24.93.185.231 (talk) 23:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: The opening line of the article states that Operation Infinite Reach was the codename for "cruise missile strikes on al-Qaeda bases". This seems imprecise to me as it implies that all the targets of the strikes were indeed Al-Qaeda bases, which is highly disputed in the case of the al-Shifa pharmaceutical factory.
Would it be better to say something like "Operation Infinite Reach was the codename for American cruise missile strikes on an al-Qaeda base in Afghanistan and an alleged al-Qaeda base at the al-Shifa pharmaceutical factory in Sudan"? Zinedine Socrates (talk) 23:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it right to say the strikes were "on Al-Qaeda bases"?