lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Christopher Walken on stage and screen

message: I stumbled across this very memorable video on YouTube featuring a guest appearence of Christopher Walken on a Jonathon Ross entertainment show, Saturday Zoo back in 1993. The video in question is of the better quality of all version on YouTube but not to mention it lists the airdate as well, where the others don't.
If this is acceptable for inclusion could someone please do so? I would but Wikipedia has changed dramatically from when I last made an edit some years ago and I fear I'd make a meal of it.Bellboyjr (talk) 16:47, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  1993 Saturday Zoo appearence 

message: I have just completed an entire ref list for Walken's filmography.  Perhaps there can also be ref lists for both his television and theater contents? Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 04:36, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref list 

message: I don't see any mention of the work he's done for Kung Fu Panda as the tiny villain Tong Fo... apparently because this guy is actually voiced by Jeff Bennett... best impression I ever heard. Should we mention the impersonations of Walken as his influence on popular culture or something? 184.145.18.50 (talk) 17:21, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Voice acting

message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyCU7CrFg4E
If an interested editor would like to double verify,
I'm unsure Christopher is in the referred to song MV.
The Angel included in said MV is a youth. eARTspI . TOK . 3bs 17:32, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Skid Row music video reference...
Talk:People (Australian magazine)

message: I'm trying to get in touch with my pictures and also my old photographer from about 2001 2 2003. My name was isiris maybe isiris Varuna. My photographer's name is Bill or William Smith. It's been a while ago. He also had a website called allaussiegirls.com maybe .au. I was on the website under the same name and was with Ivy. I'm trying to get a hold of him, and the editions. I really want to get back InTouch with him and I'm worried. If anyone has any information about this please call me on 0416094493 or email me back please. Thanks again isiris Varuna  Isiris varuna (talk) 10:00, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm trying to find my photographer from Brisbane Caboolture area
Talk:Complication (horology)

message: Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving. -- Yamara 12:17, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Time/Assessment|WikiProject Time assessment rating]] comment 

message: The way the lead is currently worded ("In horology, the term complication refers to any feature beyond the simple display of hours, minutes, and seconds in a timepiece."), it sounds as though this applies to electronic as well as mechanical timepieces.  I would guess that it should be limited to mechanical ones? --Macrakis (talk) 21:30, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not necessarily. Apple apparently uses the term "complications" to refer to something on it's new watch.  <sarcasm - maybe/> Perhaps we should include it? Jimw338 (talk) 23:01, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Only mechanical

message: It looks like user 175.176.173.30's edit at 2016-02-01T18:01:30 should be rolled back.
Ultra-coglicatd?
I'm not sure if that's a typo or whether (together with other issues) the entire edit is an act of vandalism.
Perhaps someone more familiar with horology than I am can confirm? Dotyoyo (talk) 20:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible vandalism

message: The lede originally stated "In horology, the term complication refers to any feature beyond the simple display of hours, minutes, and seconds in a timepiece".  At 16:20, 5 May 2014‎, an anonymous editor removed all mention of seconds (from the lede, and another paragraph).  By implication, the second hand is therefore a complication, although this is not actually stated anywhere.  Is this correct?  If so, it should be made explicit.  If not, the old text should be restored. Iapetus (talk) 14:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Oddly enough, I once bought a Elgin pocket watch that was made without a seconds hand because I was amused to think "It took enough work to remove the second hand from a production pocket watch that it should be considered a complication."  In any event, I corrected the issue at hand: seconds are a part of a simple movement and not a complication. I'd cite that but.....seriously....removing seconds was borderline vandalism.Mad Bunny (talk) 21:36, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the second hand? 

message: This article contradicts itself on which is the most complicated pocketwatch in the world.  The bulleted list says the Patek Philippe Calibre 89, Supercomplication, and the Star Caliber 2000 are the 3 most complicated, then underneath it says the The Vacheron Constantin Reference 57260.  The few sources given are only based on press releases from the companies themselves, reprinted on watch promoting websites.  If the article is going to make promotional claims like this, they should be supported by an independent WP:NPOV source such as a watchmaking book or Guinness.  --ChetvornoTALK 22:37, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article contradicts itself on which is the most complicated watch
Talk:Incisura lytteltonensis

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:58, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Ischnochiton circumvallatus

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 19:32, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Ischnochiton granulifer

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 19:32, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Ischnochiton luteoroseus

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 19:32, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Kerguelenella innominata

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:16, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Kerguelenella stewartiana

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:15, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Lepidopleurus finlayi

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 07:42, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Lepidopleurus inquinatus

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 07:42, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Lepidopleurus otagoensis

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 07:42, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Self-guided tour

message: This section of "Examples" that was removed I believe are very revelent to the article. They were removed because of Wikipedia:External links which states that:  Adding external links can be helpful to everyone, but they should be restricted to those that are most meritable, accessible and relevant to the article. Some are external links to Self Guided tours and some are brochures associated with Sefl Guided tours. These were put here to show examples and are most  relevant to the article.
The first one is a brochure of a University - "Self Guided Tour of UCLA" - an educational facility.
It is quite common that people do self quided tours of educational facilities.
*Educational facilities 
The next one is a "Self Guided Tour" (wording on brochure) of at Meriam Library at California State University.
*Personal research 
The next one is a self guided tour with a "GyPSy Guide" electronic device that plugs into your car stereo.
*Canadian Rockies Self Driving Itineraries with GyPSy Guide
The next one is an external link to Randonnée Tiours - a North America leading specialist in self-guided active tours since 1990. 
*Self guided vacations 
The next one is of self guided tours with association to audio devices. Here the Biltmore Estate would be another example where most people tour the facilities on their own (self guided) with an audio recorder telling you what you are seeing at each step.
*Self guided audio experiences 
The next one is a self guided tours with the National Park Service (brochure says: Self Guided Auto Tour).
*National Park Service 
The next one is of self guided adventure tours tours. 
*Adventure experiences 
The next one is of self guided tours with Brookgreen Gardens as a perfect example as well as other gardens in other cities.
*Botanical / sculpture parks 
:San Francisco, California 
:Albuquerque, New Mexico 
:Las Vegas, Nevada 
Unless there is a better reason that is valid I will be putting these prime examples of Self Guided Tours back that are  relevant to the article. --Doug talk 12:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would suggest that an appropriate compromise is to trim the list (it was pretty long) and to focus on retaining those with minimal corporate advertiseyness.  For example, the NPS link is excellent.  The GPS tour thing (that you're citing here by product name) looks like an ad.  UCLA free PDF?  Good.  Randon's dot-com?  Ad.  So I'd recommend culling the list on that basis.  Also, note that WP:EL recommends linking to HTML rather than direct to rich media (like the NPS and UCLA PDFs) if possible -- if there's a good web page for that, then it's preferable, but PDF is certainly fairly commonplace if that remains the best option. — Lomn 06:04, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Leuconopsis obsoleta

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:55, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Leucosyrinx pikei

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:53, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Lima zealandica

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 20:00, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed