lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:New England hotspot

message: It would be nice if someone could add detail to the starting point, the stuff about what's in Ontario, and what's said about some potential volcanoes in Africa. 76.66.200.21 (talk) 06:05, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Potential volcanoes in Africa?  That would take a hundred million years or so, wouldn't it?  Geo Swan (talk) 15:58, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There are no volcanoes in Africa created by the New England hotspot. The info is about the seamounts created by the New England hotspot on the African Plate in the Atlantic Ocean, not in Africa. BT (talk) 16:26, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

text: I'd be interested in learning why a spot that appears to be much closer to Africa than to the northeastern United States is termed the New England Hotspot. PurpleChez (talk) 14:57, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It is named after the New England Seamount chain. Volcanoguy 04:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: expand

message: This story is a classic example of unproven make-believe passed off as science.
::"The lack of an obvious track west of the Monteregian Hills may be due to either to failure of the plume to penetrate the Canadian Shield, to the lack of recognizable intrusions, or to strengthening of the plume when it approached the Monteregian Hills."
Of course, the lack of an obvious track could mean that these features were not created by the same mantle plume, or a mantle plume at all.  As could the lack of an obvious track between the Nashville Seamount and the Meteor Seamount.  
Has anyone made any attempt to prove that a mantle plume can cross an upwelling plate boundary like the Mid-atlantic ridge?  What exactly is postulated to be the cause of a mantle plume?
A simpler explanation for the New England sea mount chain is a fault line that extruded intermittently along its full length, possibly forming all the sea mounts in a relatively short period of time.Cadwallader (talk) 23:45, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Every thing in the article is from geological references. If the volcanics were related to faults, the volcanism would not likely be older to the west and younger to the east. Insted, it would be a mixture of ages like volcanoes found in volcanic arcs. BT (talk) 20:52, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Factcheck

message: Should Great Meteor hotspot track be merged into this article? Also, what is the origin of the name "Great Meteor"? What if anything does the hotspot have to do with meteors?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.161.67.209 (talk) 14:49, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no reason for merger. That would be the same as merging Hawaiian–Emperor seamount chain with Hawaii hotspot. Volcanoguy 20:42, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger?
Talk:David Bell

message: I removed the reference to David Bell, Founding Father of geological engineering because it was linked to no articles and when I did a search in both Wikipedia and Google, I could not discover any such person. Admittedly this was not an exhaustive search, but given the scope of the claim it seems surprising that there is nothing readily available out there. — scribblingwoman 04:09, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Bell, Founding Father of geological engineering
Talk:Kernel method

message: "Because of the particular culture of the research community that has been developing this approach..."  What does this mean?  It sounds like there are some politics going on, and maybe if someone else had been doing the work, they would have pursued some other approach?  (OK, I guess that's likely in any case.  But the "culture" reference seems odd, almost POV.)   Mcswell 19:14, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the merge proposal. KM related articles on wikipedia are too scattered. --09:18, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

text: Absolutely, the Kernel trick article must be merged with the general kernel methods article. It makes no sense to have a separate article. The sooner the better. Jerappelle (talk) 01:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

text: I agree. The Kernel Trick always uses Kernel Methods, and the concept is essentially outlined in the Kernel Methods article anyway. User:aenikata:aenikata  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aenikata (talk • contribs) 22:20, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Completed. I urge everyone who supported the merge to copyedit the resulting page. I also added an informal overview while I was at it. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 18:59, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:New York Yankees managers

message: Does pinella need to be linked to twice? >-{ Brandonrush }-<
The listing shows the order of succession.  You'll notice Billy Martin is linked 5 times.  Linking names makes them bold when the template is placed on each manager's page and easier to see.  Averyisland (talk) 18:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Piniella
Template talk:CC BY-SA 3.0

message: Could someone please move the "This template should only be used on file pages." sentence from the template to the /doc? Thanks 
Mhiji (talk) 13:17, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: (e/c)(non-admin comment) I think this is a misunderstanding, and that the text needs to stay in the template. When the template is used correctly, on a File/Image page, the text does not appear; but if anyone tries to use the template in another mainspace, the message warns them that they have used the template wrongly. -- John of Reading (talk) 21:03, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Mhiji, 13 December 2010 

message: I've implemented a tweak in the sandbox version, namely 
instead of coding  directly.  Specfiying dw=yes will supress the categorisation in :Category:All free media, for derivative works where the subject shown is non-free, and thus can't be moved to Commons.
It would be appreciated if this straightforward change was implemented in the main template.
: Done. Please also remember to update the docs (although I'm sure you know this already as I've told you quite a few times by now :P). — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 11:55, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images of non-free works 

message: Not sure where to put this... Change the Chinese(中文) interwiki to zh:Template:CC-BY-SA-3.0 please. Thank you very much. --211.91.223.83 (talk) 14:58, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done — I'm not an admin, but I did this for you.  Wikipedia:Wikidata explains how to edit or add to the interlanguage links shown in the left column. —RP88 (talk) 18:46, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese Interwiki 

message: ...this stuff needs to be done. --Glaisher (talk) 17:57, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[m:File metadata cleanup drive/How to fix metadata]] 

message: Can someone change Image: links to File: links, replace the underscores to spaces, and remove the unneeded  sort key?
Thank you!
Stranger195 (talk • contribs • guestbook) 06:55, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: These changes wouldn't make any difference to how the template was parsed, but on the other hand, they would take up server resources. The WMF has a big enough server farm that re-rendering 65,000 file information pages is just a drop in the bucket, but we should probably still only make changes that make an actual difference. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 16:02, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 3 October 2015
Talk:Daniel Jones

message: This page has a problem on the google hit. In the summary of the page google has archived a littered version of the page. See image here M9matr0902 (talk) 21:22, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google cache problem 

message: This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --78.133.41.39 (talk) 00:03, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:Daniel Levy

message: A move discussion is taking place at Talk:Dan Levy (producer)#Requested move 17 June 2019 which may be of interest. -- Netoholic @ 12:54, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 
Talk:Little Greenbrier (Great Smoky Mountains)

message: I have seen these two spellings used interchangeably, so I went with the spelling on topographical maps and park maps.  Bms4880 19:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Greenbrier vs. Greenbriar

message: This article needs a general history section.  I have had trouble finding enough source material (most sources focus on the historical structures in LG, rather than the community as a whole).  Bms4880 19:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History section
Talk:Reschensee

message: a (only English) google search results in 15.600 for Reschensee, 8.450 for "Lago di Resia" and just 745 for "Lake Resia" (and 451 for "Lake Reschen") - therefore per naming convention moved the article to Reschensee. --noclador (talk) 00:02, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Joyce (name)

message: I'm not a linguist, but there's no way that anything containing 'Joy' is of Latin origin.  'Joy' just screams an Anglo-ish origin.  That seems to be supported by some 'name meaning' web sites as well, such as: http://babynamesworld.parentsconnect.com/meaning_of_Joyce.html
Other sites seem to be quoting this article verbatim for the meaning of Joyce, but I'm fairly convinced that this article is wrong. 74.83.12.82 (talk) 05:19, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joy + ce .... Latin origin? 

message: I promised in an edit summary
: 05:45, 12 September 2011 Jerzy (talk | contribs | block) (986 bytes) (Undid revision 448494356 by 98.85.95.35 (talk) disruptive & unsuited, tho joyce meyers will be added to Joyce (name)if absent.) 
We already have "Joyce Meyer", the evangelist, and it appears to be (another? the same?) evanagelist who comes up under "Joyce Meyers". "Show host" can embrace many evangelists, tho i was picturing a more vanilla anchor or interviewer. I think i've done the best that could be hoped for in giving up now.--Jerzy•t 11:03, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "joyce meyers" - "show host" 

message: Lede is barely altered from cited source. 50.37.113.64 (talk) 07:03, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  COPYVIO 

message: This doesn't read to be very encyclopedic. I typically don't write these types of articles so someone who does can this please be fixed? --Donald Trung (talk)  09:18, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google it?
Talk:Landmarks of Montreal

message: This section is approximately as long as the Griffintown main article. It needn't and shouldn't be, as per the other neighbourhood summary paragraphs. Thanks, Shawn in Montreal 14:18, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Griffintown

message: It is my opinion that this section of the article be split into a new page called Downtown Montreal (much like Downtown Toronto, Downtown Vancouver, Downtown Calgary, etc. MTLskyline (talk) 04:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Downtown Montreal]]

message: Please see the appropriate page: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Places in Montreal.
MTLskyline (talk) 05:03, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: How Wiki typical - I went to the Montreal article specifically looking for this type of information for a friend who is visiting the city. The entry is very well layed out, with links to more expanded entries for each area. So, of course, someone wants to delete the damn thing. God forbid a truly useful entry be allowed to exist on Wikipedia. 24.24.211.239 (talk) 22:00, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomination for deletion
Talk:Juanfran

message: * Support but preserve the resulting redirect. It is harmless. Disagree that this is not properly a disambiguation page, is that based on some policy or guideline? This edit which removed the hndis template and added instead Category:Given names seems to be contrary to the intention of the category, see :Template:Given name: Do not use this template on disambiguation pages that contain a list of people by given names. Instead categorize the disambiguation page by including the given name parameter with the  template, but perhaps that needs clarification. Andrewa (talk) 16:28, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Late !vote caught in a race condition with closing of request
Talk:Fundy-The Isles-Saint John West

message: In the 2018 election Rick Doucet will be facing Progressive Conservative candidate Andrea Anderson Mason. She is a local lawyer, business woman, mother and wife that is passionate about the people and chose to move to the area 18 years ago. Feline mafia (talk) 03:24, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  2018 Election
Talk:Saint John Harbour (electoral district)

message: An electoral district, as it is described here is a 'riding.'  Depending of level of government elections, ridings have different names and maps in an attempt to create electoral equality.  This suggests that "Saint John Harbour (electoral district)" might better be Saint John Harbour Riding (electoral district) as it is a map diagram distinctly for the MLA position. --John Bessa (talk) 19:29, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harbour Riding
Talk:Ryan's Well Foundation

message: This article is nothing like it was when it was started - the foundation appears to have taken it over and slanted the POV to the point that it reads like an advertisement! If no one cleans this up before I do I will clean up later this week. Sidatio (talk) 22:58, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article has run amok! 

message: There was a merge tag on this article, so I merged it, with a redirect to the specific section. Well, not a true merger, because there was only one uncited sentence about the three educational programs that is being used. The rest of a block of text, probably, from the foundation's website is not used. The rest of the content that was already in Ryan Hreljac's article.--CaroleHenson (talk) 22:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge tag
Talk:Dave Hill

message: A quick look at Google indicates to me that there is no primary "Dave Hill" so I suggest the article Dave Hillbe moved to Dave Hill (guitarist) and this dab page be moved to Dave Hill ... this seems in line with mos:dab. Abtract (talk) 20:15, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Primary topic
Talk:Fred Everything

message: I think I got all the copyvio. If I missed a version that needs rev del, please ping or feel free to handle yourself Star Mississippi 14:47, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD
Talk:Wingnut (politics)

message: *Comment  , BMK. We  talked about non-neutral RfCs during the above RfC only a couple days ago. Please reword your RfC statement to be neutral. You can add all of the surrounding context, including the bit about your 12KB addition, in your response in the "Survey" section. Every time this sort of thing happens, it derails an RfC into a bunch of Bad RfC !votes interspersed with pieces of relevant discussion that actually help achieve consensus. The non-neutral wording is posted by the bot on the main RfC page, which should not include your analysis of what the refs show and whatnot. I again request that you reword the RfC statement per WP:RFCNEUTRAL. AlexEng(TALK) 23:16, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: *I didn't think it was particularly non-neutral, as the information provided was a straightforward description, but I've acceded to the comments and requests and reworded the RfC. Because of this All !voters should take a look and decide if they want to change their !votes or not. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:58, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC wording
Talk:Civic Holiday

message: I've removed the sentence "It is the only provincial public holiday" from the article.  I think St-Jean Baptiste day in Quebec is also a provincial public holiday, and I believe the Western provinces have a holiday specific to them too (at a different time of year). 74.59.88.113 20:06, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I'm in Ottawa, no one calls it anything but civic holiday here. 
--69.165.148.83 (talk) 00:05, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: Contrived sounds a little POV to me.  Maybe it could be supported with a source, if it is to stand?--24.85.68.231 (talk) 19:12, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can't find an official reason for it, then it is contrived. The period between Canada Day and Labour Day is Summer Vacation time, so maybe this holiday is for those unfortunate souls who have to work during the summer ;) Pendragon39 (talk) 10:39, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contrived? 

message: I was trying to find British Columbia Day, but was redirected here. I can't see why all the different holiday's are grouped here, since they are all provincial or locally declared holidays and a national holiday. It is also lacking history and background on most of them, outside of Alberta and Ontario. In BC, it is never mentioned as civic holiday, and can lead to confusion. I don't know the rational around this, so I'll wait on an answer. Cheers  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.16.8.23 (talk) 22:56, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  inclusive 
Talk:Cessna 350 Corvalis

message: Is there any reason why this page has the 400 specs instead of the 350 ones?
ANHL 12:36, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just an oversight I suspect - fixed! - Ahunt (talk) 23:01, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Specs

message: There have been several recent attempts to add the word "Corvalis" to every mention of the Cessna 350 in this and other articles, including attempting to rename this article to "Cessna 350 Corvalis". In general these attempts have been reverted because that article nomenclature would contradict the consensus-agreed naming standards of WikiProject Aircraft, which states: "US civil aircraft: Manufacturer and name or number as appropriate according to common usage: Boeing 707, Cessna Citation, Cessna 172, Convair 880 (not "Convair Skylark" or "Convair Golden Arrow"). Try to avoid using name and number unless it is clearly needed for some reason." It is for this reason that the Cessna 172 article is under Cessna 172 and not "Cessna 172 Skyhawk" and the Cessna 182 article is under Cessna 182 and not "Cessna 182 Skylane" etc.
Please note that the FAA Type Certificate Data Sheets do not recognize these names, as they are not part of the type designation and are merely marketing names.
The article does mention the marketing name Cessna has given the aircraft, including its origins and that is sufficient - it doesn't have to be included in every mention of the aircraft or in the article title. If you disagree then discuss it here and gain consensus rather than edit warring. - Ahunt (talk) 18:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name and article name

message: The main photo provided on this page shows a Columbia (Cessna/Corvalis) 400 model, not a 350.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.82.0.45 (talk) 15:00, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite right, thanks for bringing it up.  - Ahunt (talk) 15:08, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect photo
Talk:Unique visitor

message: How is unique visitor different from unique user? The difference needs to be spelled out, or the articles need to be merged. --Mrs Scarborough 20:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: User/Visitor Difference?

message: Unique user and Unique visitor should be merged, as already proposed in 2007. Trofobi (talk) 03:33, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I would propose a rapid merger of Unique visitor and Unique user, as the larger, more detailed of the two (Uu) states repeatedly that the two are synonymous, and the smaller of the two articles (Uv) is very short and based on a single source. Transfer of the content should be fast and simple, with addition of a sentence that Uu is (it appears) more often used my the coding communities, and Uv by business/marketing individuals. Cheers. Le Prof  User:Leprof_7272 Leprof 7272 (talk) 16:17, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge request
Talk:Flora (spread)

message: Becel and Flora are the same product, so shouldn't they be the same article? AndrewRT(Talk) 20:21, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: There is a lot more that could be said about the history of Flora. But I don't have all the dates and details to hand, maybe someone does?  As I recall it:
*1960s?: It is thought that saturated fats, as in butter, are unhealthy, and Unilever comes up with Flora, made from partially hydrogenated vegetable oil.
*early 1970s: evidence starts to emerge that partially hydrogenated vegetable oils are slightly carcinogenic. Unilever continues to advertise Flora as a healthier alternative to butter
*1990s: It is established that partially hydrogenated vegetable oils are risky because of the trans structures they are likely to contain. Unilever quietly changes the formula for Flora to avoid trans fats.
Maproom (talk) 12:16, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: More history

message: This starts with "Flora is a brand of butter...". Surely it isn't butter at all, and that's kind of the point of it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.191.176.32 (talk) 09:05, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, this is a ridiculous statement. Flora is basically margarine mostly consisting of rapeseed oil. AFAIK it contains no butter at all. I'll change butter to margarine. --Ef80 (talk) 22:15, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Butter? 

message: The Guardian (April 7th 2017) says Unilever are stopping producing Flora. Is it still on sale?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.133.175.27 (talk) 07:17, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Done?

message: The title should be changed to Flora (spread).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MartinPeace (talk • contribs) 08:49, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: * Done. Lard Almighty (talk) 16:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not margarine