Talk:Together TV

message: :Image:Community Channel logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:57, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Community Channel logo.gif

message: :Image:Community Channel logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Community Channel logo.gif

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Community Channel (UK). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130314075451/http://www.redhotcurry.com/archive/entertainment/tv/kismet_road.htm to http://www.redhotcurry.com/archive/entertainment/tv/kismet_road.htm
*Added archive https://archive.is/20140219130919/http://www.theacademy-ssea.org/latest/news/708_street_soccer_scotland_founder_is_change_maker_of_2012 to http://www.theacademy-ssea.org/latest/news/708_street_soccer_scotland_founder_is_change_maker_of_2012
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070518163956/http://www.chargetv.co.uk/ to http://www.chargetv.co.uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:39, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I've just had to edit out a large amount of text that was obviously written by Community Channel or people working for the channel. A lot of sections praising and promoting themselves and their programming without due cause or citations. Lots of peacock terms. Et cetera. Looking back, turns out this article was actually created by an account called "Communitychannel", so I've no doubt that they've continued to edit and add to this page.
Community Channel folks, if you're reading this, I'd highly recommend that you stop editing your own articles. It's blatantly obvious when you do and it's a prime example of a conflict of interest. Don't.
188.39.91.66 seems to be the main person contributing these, at least as far as I can be bothered to look back. Pigammon (talk) 13:45, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, fair point, although there don't seem to have been any further edits beyond the (reverted) attempts at the end of January. I trimmed some of the worst excesses in mid-January but if further issues remain then either go ahead and edit, remove and improve, or perhaps tag the article with a COI template if its problems are more systemic. Bonusballs (talk) 19:01, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest (COI) edits