Talk:Mohammad Nadir Shah

message: This section of the article is almost completely incomprehensible. It is filled with so many grammatical errors and awkward syntactical fragments that it serves only to confuse the reader. In the interests of maintaining a standard of quality above an elementary school level, I would suggest that it be either rewritten or removed. I do not feel comfortable rewriting the passage, as I am not familiar enough with the events.    —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.36.159.47 (talk) 20:06, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin and Rise to Power 

message: I am very familiar with this claim and know it to be quite false.  The motives of the assassin as well as the punishment are far from the truth.  The shooter was promised, by a family feuding with with the Musahiban brothers, their daughter's hand in marriage in exchange for the assassination.  Only the student was executed, rather gruesomely.  That much is true.  The boy's family had nothing to do with the plot and they definitely were not harmed.  The family involved in the plot was exiled.  They were later granted amnesty and invited back to Afghanistan by Mohammad Zahir Shah.  I have first hand accounts of this.  I intend on removing this claim from the article if a solid, verifiable source is not provided.
Furthermore, I intend on removing all bias POV when I find the time.  There is clearly plenty of that present in the article.  Any thoughts?
--Khampalak 01:27, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable claim about the fate of Mohammad Nadir Shah's assassin 

message: I have rewritten the paragraph about Nadir Shah's assassination.  I've provided the two most widely known theories and have provided a reliable source.  There is still much left to be done in terms of removing seemingly biased claims which lack reliable and verifiable sources.
--Khampalak 02:43, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits - August 8, 2007 

message: Anoshirawan, you cannot simply delete this tag when another editor has inserted it.  Do it again and I will report you.  The article history documents everything you do.  --Khampalak 18:54, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the tag should stay for now. --Behnam 19:04, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  refImprove tag... 

message: The section on "Rule" seems to contradict itself about the army, saying that it remained weak, but that it put down all the rebels in just a year or two, and that the army grew to be 40,000 strong in three years!  Do we have some citations for this? --Bejnar 16:36, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Army

message: "Muhammad Nader Shah was criticised by many Afghan historians as an agent of Britain in Afghanistan. During his regime hundred of thousands of innocent people were killed in Afghanistan. His family held the highest positions during his reign. His brother Sardar Hashim was Prime Minister of Afghanistan, Sardar Mahmud was Defence Minister of Afghanistan. And most of his Ministers were from his tribe called Mohammadzai. Most of the people call him a Dictator."
All these claims but no reference? Encyclopedic content must be verifiable . If the editor does not provide reliable sources to verify his/her claims, the content will be deleted.  (Ketabtoon (talk) 07:15, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism without any reference

message: Which one is his born date, April 9, 1883 or April 10, 1880? Because upsite is writed April 9, 1883 and downsite April 10, 1880. So which one is right..?84.106.208.23 (talk) 09:51, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Born date 

message: In the info box, it seems that Shah's children are listened under "issue", if there are no complaints or if there is not some weird dynastic terminology or Afghani terminology that I am unaware of for children, then I will change this to children - AH (talk) 04:51, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox Wierd Section 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved (non-admin closure)  ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 09:20, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Mohammed Nadir Shah →  – Correct romanization of the vowel ('e' to 'a') as per local Afghan naming pronunciation.  - Furthermore, this spelling is used in this academic sourcehttps://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft7b69p12h&chunk.id=s1.17.5&toc.depth=1&toc.id=appb&brand=ucpress, this Indian government source from the 1930shttps://ignca.gov.in/Asi_data/16508.pdf, and perhaps most importantly this official script of the Kingdom constitution from the 30s.http://www.dircost.unito.it/cs/docs/Afghanistan%201931W.htm  WR 15:37, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

text: I support this move due to his ancestors Dost Mohammad Khan being referred to as the correct term. (Also aforementioned on Daoud Khan's page.) Noorullah21 (talk) 03:48, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 February 2023