lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:French Imperial Eagle

message: The two articles are about the same thing.  French Imperial Eagle describes the things, while Regimental eagle discusses some of the various eagles taken by the British.  
It's wasteful to have two articles on the same subject.  Should be merged, although more detail should be added - the Regimental eagle article is very much British POV, but by bringing the two together, perhaps editors will be inclined to add details of other captured cuckoos. Carre 13:08, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge done Carre 10:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: I've put the POV tag against the Captured Eagles section, since it deals exclusively with the trophies captured by the British.  I've amended it slightly, by saying the Barossa one was the first taken by the Brits, since it most certainly wasn't the first taken overall;  would like to see information on others taken. Carre 10:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: The French lost eagles in the Capitulation of Martinique in 1809 and Guadelope in 1810 and possibly more. Simultaneously, the 29th Worcestershire Regiment of foots regimental history records the capture of French regimental colors (but without the eagles, as they had been unscrewed before battle)
Theres no doubt that numerous other regimental flags were captured in battle. Also there may have been other Eagles taken by the British army before 1811 if looked into.(75.118.14.255 (talk) 07:31, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Eagles captured by the British army 

message: i've started a section stub about the design inspiration since the eagle is known has being the french version of caesar's imperial eagle. also hitler's stylized eagles are clearly inspired by ceasar & napoleon's eagles as shown by the laurel crown which features the infamous swastika instead of SPQR or N. Cliché Online (talk) 15:29, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: inspiration

message: Was reading about "Faugh-a-ballagh" on Wikipedia, and noticed that there is disagreement in these two articles on the role of Ensign Keogh and what he said.  Seemed worth mentioning.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.46.114.130 (talk) 02:10, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency
Talk:Aenesidemus (book)

message: Schulze wrote Aenesidemus, which raised many very serious questions about Kant's book. Today, Kant's book is easily available but Schulze's book is almost impossible to obtain. There is one book that contains a short excerpt. It is Between Kant and Hegel by George di Giovanni and H.S. Harris, . With all of the junk that publishers print today, you would think that some university press would make Schulze's Aenesidemus available. Lestrade (talk) 01:10, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Google books seems to have the original in a 1911 edition  but only in snippet view, I wonder why as it is old enough to be public domain.  Useful if you needed to search in the book, at least. Seems to be a 50 euro copy here.   F. Meiner published it in a 1996 edition, , OP, original price ca 60 euros. Might help for library search, doesn't seem like anything in English but Between K & H.  John Z (talk) 05:05, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unavailability
Talk:Strawberry Line (Miniature Railway)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.strawberryminirail.co.uk/TheRailway.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:12, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:En-ge

message: How does the italic form of the En Ge ligature look like?
:Now shown in the article. —Coroboy (talk) 12:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Participants agreed that the proposed title is more WP:CONSISTENT with related pages. (non-admin closure)  ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 21:12, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: En-ghe →  – consistency, all other pages related to the letter ge are called ge and not ghe 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 16:07, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Writing systems has been notified of this discussion.  ASUKITE 16:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Russia has been notified of this discussion.  ASUKITE 16:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Relisting comment: Relisted due to lack of participation  ASUKITE 16:41, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 February 2023
Talk:Nicaraguans

message: It says Nicaraguans are people inhabiting Nicaragua and yet there are clearly people who aren't Nicaraguan inhabiting the country as well, should we not make this clear? I am an inhabitant of Honduras but it certainly doesn't make me a Honduran as I have not applied for citizenship. So I have added a sentence for clarity. We should try and get similar articles for other Central American countries. Thanks, SqueakBox 20:53, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. Thanks for that addition. I will try to work on a similar page for Hondurans. Hopefully i'll have some help from you and other contributors interested. -- LaNicoya  •Talk•  21:09, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Yep. Thanks, SqueakBox 21:12, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening

message: Why the percentages of ethnic groups are so different in the text and in the graphic? If someone knows the appropriate percentages please change it. --Enkiduk (talk) 04:45, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ethnic groups
Talk:Harrisburg, Ohio

message: The following is copied from the talk page of User:Zomboli, who wrote the second paragraph listed below.
Please read Wikipedia:Notability. If a person is notable (which the doctor that you repeatedly insert to Harrisburg, Ohio, seems not to be), he or she should be listed, but non-notable people should not be listed in a notable people section. Please stop adding him to the article. Nyttend 04:07, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of university dean? 

message: *The dean of the college is non-notable, and should not be included. Furthermore, a biography such as that should not be on this page. If he was that notable, he should have his own article (which, I would speculate, would be marked WP:AFD).
*Jon Warden is non-notable either. I found this page about him, and it seems he only played for a few months, and that does not make him notable.
*In the future, this list should be formatted so that all names are First Last (e.g. Jon Warden), and the names should not be in bold.
Let me know if there's anything else I can do to help.—HelloAnnyong [ t · c ] 00:29, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Third opinion
Talk:Obetz, Ohio

message: I added the WP:COI tag because much of the information in the article has been inserted by an employee of Obetz. CUA 27 (talk) 23:20, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI 
Talk:Kellington

message: Dont think the McCartneys are Councillors anymore. Also "And, GMI, after spending many thousands of pounds scuttled back to their hideout in Leeds." sounds very biased and unprofessional to me.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.242.160.232 (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes
Talk:Blendon Township, Ohio

message: Linking to the fatal shooting of a pregnant mother by Blendon Township cops: https://www.motherjones.com/crime-justice/2023/09/body-camera-footage-shows-ohio-police-fatally-shooting-a-pregnant-mother-of-two/. Someone should edit this into the page once we have a little time to get clarity on the nature of this murder.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.113.232.199 (talk) 03:55, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Talk:InfraRecorder

message: Removed:
However, InfraRecorder does not support DVD dual layer recording.
Since the website clearly states:
Supports recording to dual-layer DVDs.
http://infrarecorder.sourceforge.net/
--LKRaider 13:52, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed:

message: Somebody removed my line that said this can be used as an alternative to commercial burning software and works just fine  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.17.142.146 (talk) 06:20, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viable alternative to commercial software 

message: It's version 0.50 now.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bizzybody (talk • contribs) 03:13, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Latest Version

message: I tried to download it, IE does it fine, but the Google Chrome give me red screen saying "The site ahead contains harmful programs". I download file and check it by few online antiviruses. I'm also trying to figure out the reasons for this block. It sounds really strange - so many positive words for so populate soft and the BLOCK. Cannot find any articles about this. Shall we reflect this situation in the article? --Deviloper (talk) 23:11, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  help - chrome does not allow to download it 

message: Is this project dead?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.164.255.103 (talk) 06:59, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead or Alive? 
Template talk:University of Southampton

message: Why does the Highfield link in this template link to Highfield the place, not an article on Highfield Campus?  That's the equivalent of pointing the Avenue Campus link to Southampton Common or Highfield as well, or the Winchester School of Art link to Winchester.  I changed it once to a Highfield Campus link (it seems silly that Avenue Campus has its own article and the larger, older and more notable Highfield Campus doesn't) but someone reverted, without giving any reason. Waggers 14:01, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading
Template talk:User wikipedia/WikiDragon

message: * So it may not be perfect, but at least it is now. Fell free to modify. (I intentionally made it a little larger than other WikiFauna templates... the Dragon's way of BEING BOLD!!! VigilancePrime 14:01, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *I'm glad you liked the color choice I made, lol. I'm not even a WikiDragon, I'm more of a WikiFairy, so I think I have a nack for making things look better! ;-) For An Angel (talk) 14:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: * Oh, that was awesome! (And very WikiFairy-ish, or, rather, WikiZenMaster-ish, depending on a user's preference.) Thank you! Just goes to prove that us WikiDragons and WikiFairies really can get along!!! VigilancePrime (talk) 16:27, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Created 

message: : In spite of this, the category (thankfully) remains. The CfD was a ridiculous effort anyway. What's the point of wasting time on this pettiness? Anyway, I removed the tag. VigilancePrime (talk) 04:20, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: In spite...
Talk:Nines (Enneagram of Personality)

message: Isn't the list of "possible examples" too speculative for an encyclopaedia article? --Bradeos Graphon 14:06, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you.  I recently changed these lists of people from 'Examples' to 'Possible examples' as an interim measure but I think they should be removed as they cannot be verified in a way that is acceptable for an encyclopedia. Ontologicos 10:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Examples
Talk:Learning and Skills Council

message: Parts of this page read like an advertisement for the LSC!
:Shocking, I know.  And now changed. 208.51.44.100 09:50, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Peer support specialist

message: Peer Specialist: Individual in recovery from severe mental illness who is receiving or has received services from the public mental health system. Because of their life experience they provide expertise that professional training cannot replicate. Individuals who are functioning as Peer Support Specialists serving beneficiaries with mental illness must meet MDCH (Michigan Department of Community Health) specialized training and certification requirements. Peer specialists who assist in the provision of a covered service must meet the aide qualifications and be trained and supervised by the qualified provider for that service.
Peer Specialists who provide covered services without supervision must meet the specific provider qualifications.
from:
medicade provider manual supplement 
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mdch/MSA-07-52-PIHP_Bulletin_207606_7.pdf
 page-6  ablecore 14:17, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

message: This article may not be eligible for inclusion in wikipedia on notability grounds, by the way.  But this note to highlight that the article relies upon just one source, and it states that "incorporates text from" that source, which is itself an indication of poor referencing.  If material is copied from a source, even if that source is PD, it should be put in quotation marks or block quotes to a) give proper credit to the original source, b) keep segregation between wikipedia editor writing which is implicitly asserted to reflect general, noncontroversial facts vs any controversial assertions in the copied in text, and c) to facilitate other editor work to improve the article by adding in additional sources while keeping track of which assertion is sourced by what reference.  There is ongoing disagreement about what practices should be, see Talk at WP:REF.  Sincerely, doncram (talk) 08:15, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References improvement called for
Talk:Dharmesh Darshan

message: There have been two attempts to rewrite the article in a promotional way, adding unsourced praise to the article.(diff 1, diff 2) I undid these edits and attempted to steer a middle course instead.(diff 3) The article still relies on a single source, "boxofficeindia.com". This is not enough. To improve the article, reliable sources need to be added, and the statements in the article must be verifiable. Relevant policies:Wikipedia:Biographies of living personsWikipedia:No original researchWikipedia:Neutral point of viewRelevant guideline:Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sourcesRemoving incorrect statements is helpful, adding new incorrect statements as a replacement is not. If you have a conflict of interest, please discuss any proposed changes on this talk page, instead of directly editing the article. The following page may be helpful: Wikipedia:FAQ/Article_subjectsI hope this helps. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:02, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  More sources needed
Talk:Mahalakshmi Iyer

message: The redirect Gagori has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 22:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Gagori]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Gagori (album) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 22:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Gagori (album)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Categories (Peirce)

message: Most of the Wikipedia article Categories (Peirce) has come from various versions of the Wikipedia article Charles Peirce. 
The Tetrast 15:34, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution

message: It is somewhat preferable from a readability standpoint to reduce the number of inline external links to a minimum, using standard academic citations in the text, and either formatting the external links as bibliographic references in the References section or placing them in the External Links section at the end.  Ian Ouellette 14:24, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Inline External Links Considered Distracting

message: Peirce's notion of "third" seems to be akin to the concept of "dialectic" in 19th century thought.  I found that thinking in terms of this concept helped me understand what Peirce is talking about.  Has anyone mentioned this?  Tkuvho (talk) 11:08, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  dialectic 
Talk:Micheldever

message: I've added the IPA of what I understand to be the pronunciation intended by the description in the text. Could someone who knows how it's pronounced check that I've understood the original contribution correctly (i.e it rhymes with never and not with fever), and then delete the description? Cheers. Daffy2 14:24, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've no idea how to read IPA, but Micheldever should be pronounced Mitch-el (as in that family from Eastenders) dever (to rhyme with never), but the Dever in River Dever is pronouced as in Fever, should the IPA for the river be included just to clarify? Mighty Antar 23:56, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Similarly checks for the IPA transliteration for the river name 87.254.80.108 (talk) 05:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation
Talk:Ultra-linear

message: Why does the article mention a screen-grid in a triode? - by definition a triode doesn't have a screen grid so this is incorrect.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.107.129.190 (talk) 10:29, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A true triode indeed does not have a screen grid.  But a pentode connected in triode mode does.  It is this latter that the article is discussing. 86.176.156.193 (talk) 09:13, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

message: The McIntosh circuit was designed to eliminate DC switching pulses in the output transformers of class AB amplifiers.  These pulses cause distortion which cannot be corrected by negative feedback, local or global (see Pen-Tung Sah, "Quasi Transients in Class B Audio-Frequency Push-Pull Amplifiers", Proc. IRE, 24.11, Nov. 1936).
In the McIntosh circuit, the DC component of the flux is cancelled by splitting each half primary equally between the anode and cathode of each valve.  This cancels out the DC component of the flux under all conditions, unlike the usual push-pull circuit where the DC component is only cancelled out completely under pure class A conditions.  The other circuits mentioned cannot achieve this.
Half the signal voltage on the primary is also returned to the screen grids and to the control grids, as well as to the cathodes, all in phase with the cathodes.  This cancels out the feedback from the cathode in both the screen circuit and the grid circuit.
Therefore, in the McIntosh circuit, each valve operates like a pure pentode, unlike the Ultralinear, Quad or Audio Research circuits which feature feedback to the screen grids, or to both the screen grids (Ultralinear) or to both the screen grids and control grids (Quad, Audio Research).
Gkaraolides 14:31, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What you say may or may not be correct.  But since the article never introduced the point, why mention it here? 86.176.156.193 (talk) 09:13, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The McIntosh Unity Coupled Circuit is fundamentally different
Template talk:Inuit religion

message: I suggest, that "Tupilak" should be
* moved from the section of "God[desse]s" to the section of "Creatures and spirits" or to "Objects and terms"
* made to point to the recently created Tupilaq page, thus making the redlink blue.
Tupilaq seems to be not a proper noun (a person, having an identity). In Geenland, tupilaqs were made as magic tools, objects. In other Inuit cultures, word "tupilaq" has also other meanings, but not goods, rather spirits.
Because of local variations in meaning of this word, I suggest moving to section "Creatures and spirits": Greenlandic tupilaqs were rather man-made creatures, tupilaqs of other Inuits were ghost-like beings.
Physis 14:33, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tupilak
Talk:List of fictional European countries

message: Country of Moldavia reakly exists. It is a contry, not only a region!
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.200.34.92 (talk • contribs) 14:34, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Is the Island of Sodor a country of the UK, like Wales, or merely a crown dependency, like the Isle of Man? If not a country, it should be deleted from this list and kept in List of fictional islands. Goustien (talk) 19:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sodor

message: Are you sure that Illyria is completely fictional? In the Shakespeare play at least it refers to Albania,who see themselves as the descendants of the ancient Illyrian people  — Preceding unsigned comment added by KaptaşHero (talk • contribs) 13:34, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illyria 

message: Several of the entries are listed as being from the "Death Enrising" series. There is no citation for them, no reference to the series elsewhere on the internet other than mirrors of this article, and no reference to the countries likewise. As such I have removed them.
 Ms408 (talk) 02:07, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Death Enrising novels"
Talk:Rikichi Andō

message: In the first part it reads "...and final Japanse Governor-General of Taiwan from 30 December 1944 to June 1918." The 1918 date needs correction...Engr105th 01:36, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: date has been corrected --MChew 01:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates ??
Talk:Fort Jackson (Virginia)

message: I'm putting the article on hold. Please see my comments at Talk:Fort Jackson (Virginia)/GA1. Thanks! --Midnightdreary (talk) 23:00, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article review
Talk:Laila Halme

message: landed a tied 13rd place with 0 Points
Names of numbers in English#Ordinal numbers--Diwas (talk) 17:34, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  no valid data. Please clarify and correct number or suffix! (see also [[Ordinal number (linguistics)]]) Sometimes numbers may be wrong and suffix will be correct for the correct number.
Talk:Ann-Christine Nyström

message: The last line of this article claims Swedish was her native language, yet she only sang in Finnish or English (which doesn't make much sense). The infobox says she was born in Finland. She also represented Finland in the Eurovision song contest. Is there any evidence that she was Swedish? Editrite! (talk) 06:23, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Born in Finland, moved to Sweden in her 30s, so I wouldn't call Swedish her "native language". Wyliepedia @ 15:16, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finnish or Swedish?