Talk:Kentucky/Archive 1

message: How did Kentucky become a southern state?  It was on the Union side during the Civil War.  Pollinator 03:27, 10 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Southern state

message: I read with surprise the statement that Kentucky was the 13th State to join the Confederacy.  Kentucky never joined the Confederacy.  Below I quote from Kentucky's Official Tourism cabinet webpage, which describes some of Kentucky history during the Civil War:
"On April 12, 1861, Confederate troops bombarded Fort Sumter, a Union position off the coast of South Carolina. Defending the fort was Kentucky native Major Robert Anderson. With the fall of the fort, war began.  Following the capitulation of Fort Sumter, President Lincoln called for 75,000 troops to suppress the rebellion. Governor Magoffin refused, stating, “Kentucky will furnish no troops for the wicked purpose of subduing her sister Southern States.” The next day, however, Magoffin had to turn down a similar request from Confederate President, Jefferson Davis. Although Magoffin stood for the state’s sovereignty, many Kentuckians favored neutrality and hoped the Bluegrass State could hammer out a compromise between the hostile sides.
On May 16, the Kentucky House of Representatives voted that Kentucky would remain neutral during the conflict. Four days later the senate and governor approved the policy. Any hopes of mediation were eventually crushed, however, for a majority of the legislature supported the Union cause. 
Although neutrality had been adopted, Kentuckians flocked to both armies. Soon, the Federal and Confederate governments began procuring arms for Kentucky sympathizers. On August 5, 1861, state elections ended the policy of neutrality. As Southerners boycotted the election, Unionist candidates won a sweeping victory."
 
User:Flaubert 6:15, July 30, 2005
*Another reason for neutrality is the Kentucky is the birthplace of both U.S. President Abraham Lincoln and Confederate President Jefferson Davis. Although admittedly, I'm not sure if it's a **major reason** for neutrality, it is an interesting historical fact,... Dr. Cash 19:35, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Changing the introduction to delete reference to Confederacy 

message: That List of famous Kentuckians is atrociously ugly!  If there isn't room on this page to do it right, it really should be on another page.  RickK 02:40, 4 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Ugly!

message: I removed this offensive material from the page: it seems obviously beneath the Wikipedia standard. However, because I don't like deleting material wholesale, I have copied the material here. Is there anything else I should do? Alan Canon 18:05, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a case where a simple revert (aka "slap in the face") would have been just fine.  :) — Stevie is the man! Talk | Work 20:40, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

text: Ticks me off. They call us premative but can't even spell primitive correctly. What hippocritical shame. Эйрон Кинни (t) 07:12, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Offensive Stereotype Removed

message: I'm the one who added the part about how the metros only make up 45% of KY's population. Here's the evidence. I'm amazed. I thought it was a strong majority. Copy and paste. -Amit [C:\Documents and Settings\Amit Thakkar\My Documents\kymetro.htm]
That would be a file on your PC, no one can access it.--Dp462090 01:15, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: KY and the metros 

message: I have started a Cuisine of Kentucky page and wonder if any of you all think it should be polished up before I link to it in the main article. --Rakista 22:20, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cuisine of Kentucky 

message: I removed the text: "As in other areas of the South, the Republican Party dominates state government and federal government." This misrepresents the current and recent state political party control. Fletcher, elected in 2003, is the first Republican gov. in 30 years. The next year, the person he defeated, Dem. Ben Chandler, won the U.S. Congress seat that Fletcher vacated to take office. The Kentucky Senate is controlled by Reps. The Kentucky House is controlled by Dems. Kentucky AG, State Auditor, and State Treasure are Dems. Sec. of State and Agriculture are Reps. The mayors of the two largest cities are Dems. Kentucky is a divided state. It is not dominated by one party.--FloNight 01:08, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: R vs D state

message: Neutral and broader description of this important passageway.--FloNight 04:39, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cumberland Gap 

message: Is Kentucky in the South or the Midwest? You may answer the question right here. Heegoop, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
:It depends on whom you ask. Like many places along a "border" between regions, Kentucky could be classified as either the South or the Midwest. In the article on the Southern United States, note that Kentucky is shaded on the graphic at the top of the page. Much of the complexity relates to the history of the U.S. Kentucky was a western (at that time) frontier state, formed by settlers from both the North and South. Both Lincoln and Jefferson Davis were born in Kentucky, and Kentucky (for a time) declared its neutrality in the American Civil War. I usually tell people that Kentucky is part of the "Upper South," to be distinguished from the "Deep South" (Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi, for example). But it really depends on where you travel in the state. Culturally, Louisville is more of a midwestern city. Northern Kentucky (suburban Cincinnati, OH), is also more midwestern. Lexington is more southern in character. Then there's Eastern Kentucky, which is Appalachian, and thus culturally distinct from both the midwest and the south. --Tom Allen 02:36, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I'd say South, because it is also commonly listed as such and is part of the Bible belt. As a border state in the Civil War, there are many differing opinions. Эйрон Кинни (t) 07:55, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Region Kentucky is in

message: Mostly Southern (call it 80/20), but with some Midwestern traits. 
For example, Kentucky's hilly topography with many streams and rivers are typical of the South, but the "United We Stand Divided We Fall" motto is totally opposite of most "State's rights" mottos in the South.  Economically we area somewhere in between, having a better economy and population growth than most Midwestern states, but still behind true sunbelt states like Georgia, Tennessee or the Carolinas. Food and accent wise we are definatly southern.
As For Louisville,I think that the "old stock" native Louisvillians are  midwestern in accent and attitude, but Jefferson's County nearly doubled it's population from 1940-1960 with people mostly from south central and western Kentucky which really altered the culture. Econmoically, Louisville today has less of a heavy industry based economy  city than it use to be, but instead has employment concentrated in a few "high tech" automobile factories and in the service industry, making it less Cincinnati and more like Nashville. Brando03, April 20.
I don't think that I really got my point across for the state of Kentucky as I did for Louisville I have to say, I have rarely, if ever, been more offended in all my life. Kentucky is the South, has always been the South, and, so help me God, will always be the South. As Southern as Georgia, as someone said! I’m offended as a Kentuckian, as an historian, and as someone who has spent his entire life studying the history and culture of the South. Red-faced angry offended! There shouldn’t even be an argument, though, God help me, I know that there is. When someone can prove to me that the Ohio River has been moved south of Kentucky, as well as the Mason-Dixon line, I might entertain the argument. Until then, I am inclined to believe that anyone who would call Kentucky “Midwestern,” which is offensive to every fiber of my being (did I mention that?), is misinformed and doesn’t know much of what they speak. Truly, you don’t know the South if you don’t find it in Kentucky, and I don’t really care where you claim to be from or know. You can’t pigeon-hole the South! It’s much more than anything you might be inclined to believe. People want to judge every state in the South by the Deep South, I’ve come to believe. Well, the South exists in two (maybe, three) parts: The Deep South and the Upper South (some might add Mid-South, as I note a few of you have). The accents aren’t all identical, but the culture is--or is very well close. 
Now, about Louisville. I do see why you’d think it has a Midwestern under-culture, but it is a major city. The same argument, I assure you, can be made of New Orleans, Atlanta, Charleston. Major cities have major immigration, and people from all over the country--and the world--make their homes there. Sad as it is, it has shown its effects on the cities, but I assure you, at Louisville’s core, is the South. It has even been said that during the darkest days of the war, Louisville had more “Johnny Rebs” and “Southern Belles” than the entire state of Mississippi. As an historian, I might be inclined to believe that. Having mentioned Southern Belles, you’d be well advised to note Sallie Ward was a Louisvillian. Her portrait is often named “The Southern Belle.” That is because she was THE Southern Belle in the ante-bellum days. More Scarlett O’Hara than Scarlett herself! Literally, she was considered THE belle of the South! None of that is even mentioning that, as someone else noted, Louisville is a river city, giving it all the more reason to intermingle cultures. Nonetheless, to the trained ear, one can hear the traces of Southern accents in downtown Louisville, and thick as molasses accents among some of the older residence. Step outside the city limits--you can no longer judge the South by its cities. Anyone who lives in a Southern city will note the changes over the years. They’ve become melting pots, good or bad! Oh, and what is Louisville’s nickname? You don’t know? Let me tell you, “Gateway to the South!” That’s a take on its old days as a river port, and its being a Southern city, noted for two great Southern pastimes, horseracing and bourbon!
The Ohio river is a true divider of North and South. Just imagine how it held in cultures before the days of advanced transportation! 
I have no desire to get into specifics of “Civil War” loyalties, other than to say a few things, beginning with no state, country, or person, in my opinion, has been more egregiously misrepresented in history than has Kentucky. Kentucky was no more divided than was most of the South, and certainly no more divided than Tennessee and Virginia. History is recorded inaccurate folks. That’s one of the first things one learns as a historian. Part of “to the victor go the spoils” is writing the history, and there’s a very strong argument that Kentucky was a Confederate state, not only because it was considered the Confederacy by the Confederacy following a secession, but also because that secession was reported in Northern newspapers.
If Kentucky had all the soldiers they claim, every man, woman, and child--maybe even horses and cattle--would have had to enlist in one cause of another. Historically, the South’s influences were so strong in Southern Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio than Lincoln feared he was going to have to fight them too. It was also a Kentuckian who defended Atlanta from Sherman! 
I would also say that Kentucky’s accent and culture are identical--as is the climate--to Tennessee. That’s been stated time and again by people who are far more qualified than I. The accent is considered predominantly “Mountain South,” moving westward into “Plantation South,” and often a “Delta South” accent along the Mississippi. That goes for both states, though Rand McNally, I believe, published a book of maps aimed at Middle School aged kids, where the states were broken into regions (Kentucky and Tennessee were South), and they called Tennessee the Southern state most similar to the North. By the way, if I were from Tennessee, that would offend me too. 
Lastly, I want to thank those of you who have defended Kentucky. I do appreciate your efforts, and, without question, I feel I can speak for the whole of the commonwealth. I agree with Indy, in that I am insulted! Geographically, cultureally, historically,. Kentucky IS Southern. This argument would have gotten you shot 100 years ago!
Also Brandon if you're going to simplify things then you shouldn't shove all the information handed before you away and give a totally different analysis. Louisville's history is given a factual indebt description on the post before yours that would clearly conclude that Louisville was Southern before the whole industrial 1950's and what not. From having one of the largest slave owning populations to being known and priding itself as the gateway to the South/and the manufacturing capital of the South for centuries. It's safe to say Louisville is indeed a Southern city with  a hint of Midwestern influence and there's no doubt that Kentucky is a Southern state.  (Above commentary written by ) Pollinator 05:23, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The simple answer is...

message: Um, the article talks about all these bluegrass legends, and in the middle of it talks about the Backstreet Boys.  Presumably someone's idea of a joke.  MDuchek (talk) 15:03, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: hehe. That, or some really poor editing on someone's part. Fixed. Acdixon (talk · contribs) 15:12, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music 

message: 50.96.245.253 (talk) 12:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kentucky is officially a Southeastern State. 

message: Not sure of it's natural place on this wiki page but I've been placing them in the other 5 "sinkhole" states Economy section. Kentucky is one of the most indebted states and I felt that including this info was valuable and timely.  Feel free to revise/amend as you see fit. StickerMug (talk) 20:01, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the removal was correct. Every advocacy group, think tank, and quasi news organization out there compiles lists like this from time to time. What makes this one more special than any of them? Besides, in such a high-level article as this, I think this fact looks fairly trivial. Maybe if there was an article on Economy of Kentucky or Government of Kentucky or maybe Politics of Kentucky (all presently redirects), it might be appropriate (or not), but for the main article (which has in the past been tagged as too long to begin with) I don't think it is important enough to include. Acdixon (talk · contribs) 21:19, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I appreciate the feed back.  Thanks Acdixon. To avoid the "compiling of lists" phenomenon which can come off as self-promotional, I just provided the neutral stat on "taxpayer burden" which is representative of the economic situation but not promotional.  Let me know if I should revert. StickerMug (talk) 18:34, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm looking at Minnesota as an example because it is a featured article. It actually has a whole section on the state's taxes, which is probably more helpful than this in the long run. However, this article is not even close to being FA, so I won't let the perfect become the enemy of the good. (Not that this is my article, but I'm the only one who has commented so far.) I do think that the statement should say – in the prose itself – who estimated the tax burden. Also, it's not clear to me what the ranking 46th means. Is that the 46th highest burden (which would be good from a taxpayer standpoint) or is it the 46th lowest burden (which would, of course, be bad for taxpayers, since only 4 states would have higher tax burdens)? That may need to be clarified. Acdixon (talk · contribs) 15:33, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I just read the referenced source and attempted to clarify the article accordingly. However, it is not clear to me that the referenced source should be considered reliable and objective. Saying that they are non-partisan and calling themselves "the Institute for Truth in Accounting" really means absolutely nothing. In fact, I would tend to be much more suspicious of the validity of statements that come from an organization that puts "Truth" in its name than from an organization that doesn't. —BarrelProof (talk) 17:35, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Worth a trip to the reliable sources noticeboard? Acdixon (talk · contribs) 18:05, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kentucky as a "Sinkhole State" according to non-partisan "Truth In Accounting" org 

message: I'm very new to wikipedia so I wouldn't want to try editing, especially on a major subject such as Kentucky. I was just wondering if there's ever been a discussion if the high number of dry counties in Kentucky should get a mention? For an outsider such as myself it is one of the more striking aspects.
02.30, 12 October 2013  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.217.169.109 (talk) 01:33, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Dry Counties

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 17:33, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: How 'bout a seperate page for the Geography section?
It seems to be the largest section on the page, with enough information to form a seperate page ("Geography of Kentucky" or the like).
It would also help the article meet Wikipedia Article Size requirements.
Thanks.
Jakob Russian (talk) 23:18, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I clarified the claim and gave a books.google.com link to the reference.  The key is that it's a "continuous border of rivers" running along three of its sides, not that they necessarily are the entirety of all three sides.  The text in the source is awkward, but looking at any U.S. map demonstrates it. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 01:17, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for clarifying, Stevie is the man!  I thought it was a cool claim until I thought about my home state (Georgia).  Your wording makes it valid. Phildm (talk) 04:09, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

text: I take it back.  Illinois has the Wabash River in the east, Ohio River in the south, and Mississippi River in the west.  All three are continuous border of rivers.  Maybe the uniqueness is that Kentucky's three border rivers flow into each other.  Tug Fork -> Big Sandy -> Ohio -> MississippiPhildm (talk) 06:37, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography 

message: Substituted at 20:38, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: The assassination took place on January 30, 1900.  Technically the start of a new decade or century is January 1 of the year ending in 1 (There is no year zero in the Gregorian calendar).  At the least it should precede the Black Patch tobacco wars which ran from 1904 thru 1908.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markglass2000 (talk • contribs) 12:44, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the catch. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 22:01, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assassination of Governor Goebel not in the 20th century 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Kentucky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060626140323/http://corbinkentucky.us:80/fishing.htm to http://www.corbinkentucky.us/fishing.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060323200601/http://docjt.jus.state.ky.us:80/history.html to http://docjt.jus.state.ky.us/history.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111118011236/http://2010.census.gov:80/2010census/data/apportionment-pop-text.php to http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/apportionment-pop-text.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20141224151538/http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0056/twps0056.html to http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0056/twps0056.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140812223422/http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_12_5YR_B04001 to http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_12_5YR_B04001
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080601090945/http://kentucky.gov:80/Pages/unbridledspirit.aspx to http://kentucky.gov/Pages/unbridledspirit.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120420023626/http://www.kde.state.ky.us:80/KDE/About+Schools+and+Districts/Kentuckys+Schools+and+Districts to http://www.kde.state.ky.us/KDE/About+Schools+and+Districts/Kentuckys+Schools+and+Districts/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120420022820/http://www.kde.state.ky.us:80/KDE/HomePageRepository/News+Room/Kentucky+Education+Facts.htm to http://www.kde.state.ky.us/KDE/HomePageRepository/News+Room/Kentucky+Education+Facts.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060422111720/http://www.ajc.com:80/travel/content/travel/southeast/ky_stories/0305/09lvgetaway.html to http://www.ajc.com/travel/content/travel/southeast/ky_stories/0305/09lvgetaway.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061223053331/http://littlesturgisrally.net:80/ to http://www.littlesturgisrally.net/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061213232500/http://www.kdla.ky.gov/resources/KYSymbols.htm to http://kdla.ky.gov/resources/KYSymbols.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080601090945/http://kentucky.gov:80/Pages/unbridledspirit.aspx to http://kentucky.gov/pages/unbridledspirit.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: In the last few days, some anons and users have been playing with changing the governor's name in this article. We are in a period of transition, and perhaps any of both names could be included, but the constant switching creates disruption. I suggest editors interested in this article reach a consensus about what to do rather than wasting time in moving names back and forth. It raises unnecessary flags of vandalism. Thanks. Historiador (talk) 11:08, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Changing Governor's name

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Kentucky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5QkXwvPBH to http://kdla.ky.gov/resources/KYSymbols.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:10, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Please check out the new RfC that seeks to decide what to do with three rendition lists in the article.  This is to help resolve an ongoing dispute. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 13:43, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC: [[My Old Kentucky Home]] rendition lists 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Kentucky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130117104812/http://fw.ky.gov/app/news/newsdetail.aspx?id=542 to http://fw.ky.gov/app/news/newsdetail.aspx?id=542
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Kentucky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130117104804/https://www.aar.org/aboutus/Pages/default.aspx to https://www.aar.org/aboutus/Pages/default.aspx
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070410021419/http://www.cincinnati.com:80/visitorsguide/stories/071100_dinnertrain.html to http://www.cincinnati.com/visitorsguide/stories/071100_dinnertrain.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Kentucky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thinkkentucky.com/kyedc/pdfs/kyecotrd.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:54, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: "...ancestry that is predominantly American." Just because some Americans are too stupid to understand that nationality isn't the same as ethnicity, and who have no idea what their ancestry is, that doesn't make it actually correct that their ancestry is "predominantly American." It has no meaning. If you were born in the USA, then your "ancestry is American." It has zero value for differentiating between different American ancestries.76.105.216.34 (talk) 19:33, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like you may have to take that up with the US Census Bureau. TimothyJosephWood 19:36, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  `Murican Ancestry 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Kentucky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://kdla.ky.gov/resources/KYSymbols.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111015012701/http://egsc.usgs.gov/isb/pubs/booklets/elvadist/elvadist.html to http://egsc.usgs.gov/isb/pubs/booklets/elvadist/elvadist.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761554924/Kentucky.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thinkkentucky.com/kyedc/pdfs/kyecotrd.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120920170324/https://www.flylouisville.com/about-the-airport/ to http://www.flylouisville.com/about-the-airport/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://srdc.msstate.edu/poverty/ppts/womack.ppt
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761554924_12/Kentucky.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060926112913/https://chfs.ky.gov/NR/rdonlyres/6AD56B4B-7551-4E34-AE5B-E067472C503E/0/October_2004.pdf to http://chfs.ky.gov/NR/rdonlyres/6AD56B4B-7551-4E34-AE5B-E067472C503E/0/October_2004.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://kdla.ky.gov/resources/KYSymbols.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:54, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Kentucky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://kdla.ky.gov/resources/KYSymbols.htm
*Added  tag to http://0-dictionary.oed.com.clicnet4.clic.edu/cgi/entry/50126019
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761554924/Kentucky.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://danville-ky.com/attractions2.php?category=History%20and%20Museums
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070827133601/http://history.ky.gov/sub.php?pageid=23§ionid=8 to http://history.ky.gov/sub.php?pageid=23§ionid=8
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130603095042/http://www.businessweek.com/ap/2012-11-15/maker-of-hair-care-products-to-expand-in-kentucky to http://www.businessweek.com/ap/2012-11-15/maker-of-hair-care-products-to-expand-in-kentucky
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thinkkentucky.com/kyedc/pdfs/kyecotrd.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070420210040/http://www.revenue.ky.gov/business/salesanduse.htm to http://revenue.ky.gov/business/salesanduse.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761554924_12/Kentucky.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130730173629/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_20020902/ai_n12639955/pg_5 to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_20020902/ai_n12639955/pg_5
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://kdla.ky.gov/resources/KYSymbols.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:18, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kentucky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.kde.state.ky.us/KDE/About%2BSchools%2Band%2BDistricts/Kentuckys%2BSchools%2Band%2BDistricts/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150622061626/http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/21000.html to http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/21000.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:36, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kentucky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101103115412/http://geology.utah.gov/emp/energydata/statistics/coal2.0/pdf/T2.7.pdf to http://geology.utah.gov/emp/energydata/statistics/coal2.0/pdf/T2.7.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:55, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The Marching Band state in Kentucky selected in the 2019 Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade!
The Second Time Arounders Marching Band, St. Petersburg, Florida; Pulaski High School Red Raider Marching Band, Wisconsin and One More Time Around Again Marching Band, Portland, Oregon are applying for the 2019 Macy's Parade!
Wesley Whatley announcement of 10 marching bands selected in the 2019 Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1017:B428:2846:8CB5:5756:2901:6BE6 (talk) 16:49, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: That's nice, but it's hardly definitive of the state itself. Surely you aren't proposing adding this to the article on the state of Kentucky? Acdixon (talk · contribs) 18:29, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

text: This is block evasion by a long-term disruptive editor. Meters (talk) 20:26, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Marching Band State in Kentucky selected in the 2019 Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade 

message: The first sentence of the music section in this article reads, "The breadth of music in Kentucky is indeed wide, stretching from the Purchase to the eastern mountains." I don't understand what this means (otherwise I would try to fix it). Can someone help? 206.248.156.150 (talk) 19:00, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the sentence was strange. I just deleted it. —BarrelProof (talk) 21:07, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  First sentence of music section 

message: Information to be added or removed: I propose adding the below text in quotes to the education section of the page:
"Kentucky ranked 35th in the nation for educational performance, according to Education Week’s Quality Counts 2018 report. It earned an overall score of 72.5 out of 100 points and a grade of C-minus. By comparison, the nation received a score of 75.2 or a C.
Kentucky posted a C in the Chance-for-Success category, ranking 37th on factors that contribute to a person’s success both within and outside the K-12 education system. Kentucky received a mark of C-minus and finished 33rd for School Finance. It ranked 31st with a grade of C-minus on the K-12 Achievement Index."
 
Explanation of issue: I believe this text would enhance the page, adding information on the quality of the state's K-12 education which is not currently available on the page. I'm asking your consideration because I work for Education Week. I apologize if I've misformatted this or left out information you need to make a decision - I'm rather new at this.
References supporting change: this is the source I'd cite: 
Csmithepe (talk) 17:57, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kentukcy. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Steel1943 (talk) 22:34, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Kentukcy" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether :Portal:Kentucky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Kentucky until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 13:26, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[:Portal:Kentucky]] for deletion 

message: Otherwise, the Governor is still Bevin.2600:1700:EDC0:3E80:DCC5:58F5:F982:54B9 (talk) 03:44, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does the Governor-elect and running mate automatically take office when elected in Kentucky 

message: "Dimensions
 • Length 379 mi (610 km)
 • Width 170 mi (250 km)"
I honestly feel this is backwards. I live here. There's no way this state is only 170 miles across. Mari Adkins 06:19, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: From the article on length:  "Length is commonly understood to mean the most extended dimension of an object."  So the longer dimension would be its 'length' (which can conflict with the left-right sense of 'wide' or 'width', for the other dimension). SwineFlew? (talk) 20:12, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Dimensions? 

message: As a Kentuckian and a Kentucky colonel, I made several minor edits to the page and would appreciate some consensus on them, as the Talk page suggests to "be bold". First of all since bourbon is something that only comes from Kentucky, I changed the last paragraph of the description to reflect this by removing the word distilleries, Kentucky is more famous for "bourbon" than its bourbon distilleries.
I was tempted to edit "horse racing" to "thoroughbred horses" and "Kentucky Derby" because while Kentucky thoroughbreds and the Kentucky Derby are both well-known, Kentucky is not especially well-known for horse racing except for the Derby. Perhaps someone may make that edit?  
Also since it is cited in the article, in governmental documents, in the KRS, Wikipedia itself, and numerous articles that Kentucky colonels are officially Kentucky's goodwill ambassadors I added that Kentucky is also famous for "the Kentucky colonel" considering there are well over 100,000 people alive that have received the honorary commission. I also added under the corresponding sub-heading, the fact that Kentucky colonels are goodwill ambassadors which is not only well-known, but it is the only legal function of a Kentucky colonel today in contemporary society based on letters patent issued by the governor. Problemsmith (talk) 17:15, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kentucky colonel 

message: Good morning, and I would like to inform that I switched templates, knowing that Kentucky is a Southern, not Midwestern state. I also switched categories as well. But anyway I do hope that this doesn’t cause any trouble and that we not have any edit war over this. I am open to objections in case anyone objects. Heegoop 09:23, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Southern vs. Midwestern template 

message: Please update registration statistics 
https://elect.ky.gov/Resources/Pages/Registration-Statistics.aspx
Thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.121.243.237 (talk) 23:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: This section is for all practical purposes, bare.  The common litany is that Harrodsburg was the first permanent European settlement in Kentucky, established 1774. Do you know your history?  It's only possibly the first settlement; in any case, it is safe to say that no whiteman was in Kentucky at the close of 1774. Yes, they were there, and due to drownings, disease, and attacks by Native Americans, they fled in abject retreat until the spring of 1775. There is considerable scholarly redoubt about when the first permanent structures and residency by Europeans in Kentucky began.  It can be no earlier than March 1775, and was certainly established by mid-1776.  Then we need to examine the claim that it is the first permanent European settlement west of the Appalachians (What about Ouiatenon, est. 1717?). There were considerable squatters settlements north of the Ohio near Fort Henry, VA (now WVA) built in 1774, culminating in the establishment of Martin's Ferry ~1779. There were whitemen in Ohio from 1774 on, and whitemen in Kentucky from May, 1774.  Boonesboro, Maysville, and other settlements in Kentucky existed from 1775 on. So, we need to be cautious about grandiose statements of "first" here. Sbalfour (talk) 23:57, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  European settlement 

message: Who (European) discovered Kentucky?  What Year?  Where was he (what did he/they see that indisputably placed them in Kentucky?) Not LaSalle (save me). Not many Historians seem to know the answer, though there does seem to be an answer, or two possibilities. Sbalfour (talk) 02:54, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who discovered Kentucky?