lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Samuel Harsnett

message: I'm giving this article a good going over.
n.b. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=-sQRAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA81&dq=samuel+harsnett&as_brr=1&client=firefox-a Gives his death date as March 12, 1630. Don't know why the date difference: calendar change?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarry1250 (talk • contribs) 18:36, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: There are two Moretons in Gloucestershire - Morton, Gloucestershire and Moreton-in-Marsh. Prior to my recent edits the former was linked to but according to A History of Chigwell School he died in Moreton-in-the-Marsh, almost certainly the latter. What does the source used before say - I think the spelling (Morton or Moreton) is probably key. --TAS (talk) 16:44, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, that was my fault I think. Anyhow, it's Moreton-in-the-Marsh according to this source among many others. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 16:57, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of Death 

message: It would be good if a suitable image of his brass (e.g. ,  or p128-9 (Plate 22) in A History of Chigwell School) could be found and used in the article. It is one of just two depictions of him I can currently think of - the other being a bust of him in, I think, Chigwell School pictured in A History of Chigwell School. --TAS (talk) 17:28, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I emailed the email address given on the first of those links a couple of weeks ago; no reply though. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 19:16, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It might be worth contacting the Monumental Brass Society, presumably the person listed last here  might be worth a try. --TAS (talk) 20:39, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

text: The problem is its height above ground - very height to get a good side on view of. Would be useful and, of course, in the public domain if you took the photo. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 19:16, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brass 
Talk:Splint armour

message: I assume this isnt done and the creator would not like me editing? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Poseygirl (talk • contribs).
:Most Wikipedia articles are never "done". Feel free to edit the article by adding new, verifiable information, adding free images, or improving the structure or quality of current content. --Eyrian 01:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As the 'primary' author I can say: Eyrian is right, it ain't done and if you have something to contribute than please do so. Mercutio.Wilder 12:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing 

message: One source for "Splint mail" being a Victorian "mistake":
Game of Thrones and the Medieval Art of War
By Ken Mondschein
...otherwise hundreds of D&D and fantasy books Jmackaerospace (talk) 09:13, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Mail
Talk:Samuel Newman

message: In terms of his biography, from "Paige's History of Cambridge, MA.," p. 615 a later Samuel Newman of Rehoboth (?possibly a son) appears to have married, first Hannah Bunker on 2 May 1689, and probably m. widow Theodosia Wiswall before 1709. 
Patience Newman, possibly a daughter, married Deacon Nathaniel Sparhawk of Cambridge, MA, 3 Oct. 1649, with their offspring, including Sibyl Sparhawk Wigglesworth of Dedham and Malden, who was married to the published poet Michael Wigglesworth, and was mother and grandmother to the first two holders of Harvard's Hollis Chair of Divinity. 
These might be ties worth checking out and elaborating upon, since the connections with published written work and education seem so strong.
(I don't know why it's gone to bold red and can't fix it, sorry)
108.7.186.137 (talk) 20:59, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lymphocyte homing receptor

message: This article is interesting but the link to one of the sources, Jutila M A (1994) Function and regulation of leukocyte homing receptors Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 55, pp. 133-140.http://www.jleukbio.org/content/55/1/133.full.pdf, wasn't working for me.Lmmcarle55 (talk) 03:20, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Santorio Santorio

message: Not that I really know anything about this fellow but I believe he is more commonly known as Santorio Santorio.  This is also implied by the first line of the article as it stands right now.  violet/riga (t) 23:52, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The surname was originally Svetina according to the Slovenian Biographical Lexicon. --Eleassar my talk 00:26, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: check the most recent publication on this guy (as pointed out by a colleague of mine): https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-79587-0. The Real surname seems to be Santori--132.187.247.17 (talk) 20:34, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  the Real Name was Santori
Talk:KMTK

message: This source can be used to expand the programming or history section of this article. - Dravecky (talk) 05:33, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for future expansion
Talk:Saul Levi Morteira

message: The inclusion of a denial of Morteira's being either as the first sentence strikes me as not only odd but unjustifiably antagonistic, or suggestive of antagonism, barring some context of which I am unaware and which I do not find in the article. Does anyone know why it is written so? Czrisher (talk) 13:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ashkenazi vs. Sephardim
Talk:KYVL (AM)

message: An FCC filing says KMED and KYVL will swap call signs effective January 11, 2023:
https://enterpriseefiling.fcc.gov/dataentry/public/tv/draftCopy.html?displayType=html&appKey=25076ff38563263b0185833411561fb1&id=25076ff38563263b0185833411561fb1&goBack=N -- Thomas H. White (talk) 23:34, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pending call sign swap between KMED and KYVL on January 11, 2023
Talk:Saul Wahl

message: That this story is a fictional legend ought to be made clear.  It is not as though 1587 is some time lost in the mists of history where we can't tell if this story is true or not.  Furthermore, there seems to be clearly false context about Poland provided in the article.  Firstly, is the Prince Radziwill of the story meant to be Mikołaj VII Radziwiłł?  If so, our article on him contends he was a protestant, who would thus be rather unlikely to go on a pilgrimage to Rome.  Beyond that, the claim that the Polish throne could not be empty is obvious nonsense - as an elective monarchy, there were always lengthy interregna between reigns - there was even a three year interregnum from 1444 to 1447.  At the time in question, there was an interregnum between the death of King Stephen on 12 December 1586 and the election of Sigismund III on 18 September 1587 - nearly an entire year.  During this time the standard procedure was to make the archbishop "interrex".  According to our articles, again, the interrex in this period was Stanisław Karnkowski, the archbishop of Gniezno.  
At any rate, obviously the story about this guy being king is nonsense.  But was he a real person at all?  This doesn't seem at all clear from the article.  john k (talk) 05:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  The prince in this story is as far as I can tell is Mikołaj "the Black" Radziwiłł. The story is sourced in numerous books and is obviously not nonsense at all. Shlomke (talk) 12:34, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't say that the story about being a king for a day is true. Encyclopedia Judaica says it's a "tradition" and "belief" not supported by historical data. ), but the person clearly existed and was somewhat influential in upper echelons of the government at that time.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:41, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article makes no sense and has nothing to prove it.  I am born and raised in Poland, but i have never heard this story before.  I believe it should be deleted.  Norum 05:43, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for deletion 

message: There is a bug in this article.
This is a legendary character, so he cannot be considered a provisional ruler.
I propose to correct this error or delete the article. PolishBoy123 Furaffinity (talk) 14:35, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in the article
Talk:Scipione Borghese

message: Could someone please clarify why this image is up for deletion? Are there any compromises/ other images we could use. Contaldo80 (talk) 17:31, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apollo and Daphne 

message: Mormando calls "the most unworthy Pignatelli" (Bernini -p.49) "morally compromised"; yet Pignatelli's page says "Pignatelli demonstrated himself worthy of the episcopal purple, ..." So which is it? He clearly dislikes the "unsavory" Borghese, and apparently Pignatelli by association. However, he relies on Marta, a spy for James I of England. I don't question Mormando's translation, but the disinterestedness of his source. Mannanan51 (talk) 17:03, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mormando 
Talk:Bánica

message: The cite is still a hearsay; nothing is confirmed. If not, why to write "it is believed..." --Pepemar2 (talk) 00:50, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bánica and the Parsley Massacre 
Talk:KOPB (AM)

message: Lots of info on this station available to expand this article, including this. - Dravecky (talk) 04:24, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources for future expansion 

message: This station has been criticized for a glaring lack of coverage of local issues in the community in which it is ostensibly based (Eugene/Springfield).  When the station is not channeling either the BBC or New York programs like WNYC, the news, weather, and public service coverage is centered on the Portland, Oregon area.  In the past three years there have been two severe weather emergencies in the Eugene/Springfield area which have closed schools, roads, and public services for up to a week -- neither received coverage on KOPB 1600.
The station actually has no physical presence in the Eugene/Springfield area, other than a transmitter.  There is no local mailing address, no local phone number, and no local email -- in short if you live in Eugene or Springfield and want to contact the station, you can't.  Sole contact is through OPB's central email address in Portland, and response time can be two weeks or longer.  Basically this is a large Portland metro-station which has stuck its fingers into the broadcast pie around the state, preventing local ownership of stations that could better serve their communities if they were operated locally.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.89.176.249 (talk) 20:23, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critique
Talk:KLVP

message: It should be explained in the article how the move will affect KRRC if it keeps the 97.9 frequency.  78.26 (talk) 15:40, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Tualatin 

message: As of November 2018 KLVP-FM now currently airs Air 1 on its HD2 subchannel (instead of K-Love Christmas music) and airs K-Love Classics on its HD3 subchannel.76.27.198.89 (talk) 03:48, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: HD Radio
Talk:Semyon Dezhnev

message: Is F. A. Popov and Fedot Alekseev perhaps the same person (see Федот Алексеевич Попов), or are they at least relatives?. Фёдор Алексеев links to Popov, so he might be the same person, mentioned here. --xJaM (talk) 04:15, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: F. A. Popov

message: This is a complete replacement from the Haklyut Society book of 1981.  I have not seen anything later that might correct errors if there are any. Benjamin Trovato (talk) 00:54, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete re-write 21sep09
Talk:Audio/video sync

message: Normally I would agree that the Audio Video sync and A/V sync articles be merged, sicne they refer to the same problem. The industries however have seen a significant split in usage of these terms. Television production and in particular production for non-professional applications (i.e. non technical types) tend to use audio video sync, whereas network engineering and technical people who deal with the problem on a daily basis commonly utilize A/V sync and film people and consumers use lip sync. Given the specific usage in different professional circles I think having seperate articles is worthwhile.
TVtech 00:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary, we generally have articles on things, not words.  Articles for different terms meaning the same thing should be merged; the usage of the different terms can be discussed near the beginning of the article. —Celithemis 03:47, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Didascalia Apostolorum

message: I'm not sure that there's consensus for this as the article declares. I couldn't access the relevant pages in the cited source. Stewart-Sykes, The Didascalia Apostolorum. (Brepols, 2009, p. 15) argues that the initial chapters show some relationship to the Didache, though this is debatable and certainly does not apply to the majority of the work.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hilty7 (talk • contribs) 21:02, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The quoted text, the Bradshaw that I have now in my hands, states at pag 80: "Didascalia Apostolorum: This church order is obviuolsy modelled on the Didache, ..". Modelled, or modeled just means based upon, expanded from, and it is not in contradiction with the Stewart-Sykes text you quote, and that you can surely insert in the article with its refernce. A ntv (talk) 21:48, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clearly modeled on the Didache?
Talk:KRXF

message: I had not changed the stations EPR and other stats because the fcc site said that krxf's freq was 94.1 and kxix was 92.9 i thick that there was a mix up on this info. Cnbdragon (talk) 07:39, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Station Power
Talk:Shabbethai Horowitz

message: Similar to Christopher Atkinson (missionary) and Christopher Atkinson Saville, there appears to be two separate people here; the talk page for Shabtai Sheftel Horowitz redirects to Shabbetai Horowitz; I think there should be a separate talk page for Shabtai Sheftel (who is the cousin of Shabbetai)--FeanorStar7 17:29, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: . Thanks for pointing this out. -- -- -- 03:47, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for fixing it. --FeanorStar7 (talk) 10:22, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Two people represented by one talk page
Talk:KRKT-FM

message: Note: There is some bad information on the web about this station, but Wikipedia has it right, A Google search on [ KRKT Ventura ] turns up many pages that say that KRKT is at 88.1 MHz in Ventura, California, not 99.9 / 96.3 / 100.5 Mhz. in Albany / Salem / Sweet Home, Oregon.  The FCC database says it is in Oregon: [ http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/fmq?call=KRKT ]. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:59, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:KRDM

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the ICAO code reference to an airport is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the airport. It's not about which subject is more famous, just that the radio station is primarily identified by this name while the airport is primarily identified by its full name with the ICAO code only a secondary reference to that airport. - Dravecky (talk) 23:16, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:Khaboris Codex

message: :Quote from the "Introduction to the Khabouris Codex Transcription": "Carbon dating has found this copy of the New Testament to be approximately 1,000 years old." Why then in the main article writes "It has been carbon-dated to the first decade of the 4th century"? also the introduction beggin with "The Khaburis Manuscript is a copy of a second century New Testament, which was written in approximately 165 AD (internally documented as 100 years after the great persecution of the Christians by Nero, in 65AD)." See: http://www.dukhrana.com/khabouris/files/001%20Introduction.doc --FlorinCB (talk) 07:10, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Its supposedly old date and colophon reading (in truth the colophon is illegible and no transcription has ever been published) are simply persistent fibs that have circulated around the internet. I have removed them from the article. אמר Steve Caruso 21:16, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Shlomo Ephraim Luntschitz

message: The following text was added to the introduction in a footnote by :
:Although most write this as Keli Yakar, "the second word should be Yekar" (יְקָר), as the vowelization appears in Proverbs 20:15 (Rabbi Dr. Marc Shapiro, the Seforim Blog, The Pew Report and the Orthodox Community (and Other Assorted Comments), part 1, endnote 4). This vowelization also appears in the Jewish Encyclopedia entry.
This is very detailed and potentially unhelpful. In the text in Mishlei 20:15 the grammar requires that the first vowel is a shva. By Shapiro's logic, we should be pronouncing the first word with a chaf rather than a kaf. The name of the sefer when standing alone can definitely be "Keli Yakar"; there are other examples of seforim that have names derived from Tenach but not in their exact form and spelling. JFW | T@lk 18:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Firstly this is not a violation of no original research since  reliable, published sources were referenced. As to your difficulty with Shapiro's published comment please don't take it the wrong way but your statement that by his logic we should pronounce "the first word with a chaf rather than a kaf" is simply mistaken (and what I'll say now would be NOR if included in the article) since the only reason that in the verse it's a khaf rather than a kaf is because, in the verse, the word כלי has the waw (וּ) prefix (making for וכלי). To say that even without this "ו" prefix it should be a chaf is a fundamental misunderstanding of practical Hebrew grammar. As an aside, this mistake is most commonly made by certain American Ashkenazim when they say "Bigsan and Seresh" instead of Teresh as it should be pronounced in the absence of the prefix, since the removal of the dagesh is only because the word in Esther 2:21 "וָתֶרֶשׁ" was preceded with its waw prefix. Contributor613 (talk) 19:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of sefer
Talk:KNRQ

message: On October 29, 2013 KXPC-FM 97.9 FM Aloha, OR changed their call letters to KLVP, to go with the K-Love contemporary Christian format. The KXPC calls ae now at 90.3 FM in Sandy, Oregon, that station (since 11/3/2013) is airing the Radio Nueva Vida Spanish religious format.  Therefore the KXPC-FM article should be renamed KLVP.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.27.198.89 (talk) 15:52, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: KXPC-FM becomes KLVP
Talk:Ator, the Fighting Eagle

message: That has to be the worst summarized Plot ever.  99.24.188.140 (talk) 22:36, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you mean that it's the worst plot ever, summarized. : ) Evanh2008, Super Genius  Who am I?  You can talk to me... 00:49, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worst Plot Writing 
Talk:Simon Le Moyne

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:20, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Syriac Sinaiticus

message: User:Leszek Jańczuk  was so convinced that a Sinaiticus is a noun, that he moved the article to Syriac Sinaiticus from Sinaitic Palimpsest. --Wetman (talk) 15:46, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The article is called "Syriac Sinaiticus" (ending "us").  The lead immediately states "Syriac Sinaitic" (no "us").  There is a redirect from the latter.
Surely the article title and lead ought to agree on the name.   Should one be changed?  Or should the lead open with: "The Syriac Sinaiticus (or Syriac Sinaitic) ..."?
Feline Hymnic (talk) 11:28, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which is it?  Or is it both? 

message: Can one disambiguate and wikify these awful TLAs:
 Matthew 12:47 is omitted, as in א*, B, L, Γ, 1009, ℓ 12, ff1, k, syrc, copsa.[6]
?
It is hard to read as such. Zezen (talk) 14:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Awful abbreviations
Talk:Barbarosa

message: Spanish for "Red Beard" would be "Barbaroja".  "Barbarosa" translates to "Pink Beard".  The movie was presumably named by a non-Spanish-speaker who was thinking of the Italian name, "Barbarossa".  I'm adding a footnote to that effect, but somebody with information about the production should address this issue in the article.  J. D. Crutchfield | Talk 15:34, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Barbarosa" is not Spanish for "Red Beard"
Talk:Battle of La Plata

message: TWO Battles of La Plata?
Hi.  Bit confused about this article.  Just finished Che Guevara's 'Reminiscences of the Cuban Revolutionary War' and one of the chapters is about a clash called 'The Battle of La Plata'.  However, it does not seem to be the same engagement as the one featured in this article.  Che appears to be writing about a much smaller confrontation which happened at an earlier stage of the Sierra Maestra campaign.  Can anyone confirm that there were indeed two separate battles at different times in the same area?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.174.8.253 (talk) 12:55, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Talk:For United Ukraine!

message: Is People's Democratic Party of Ukraine  the same party as Democratic Party of Ukraine? Mariah-Yulia (talk) 03:03, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, but they're both a part of Ukrainian Regional Asset. —dima/talk/ 04:24, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ?