lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mir Castle Complex

message: Do you think the influence of Flemish/Dutch masonry and style should be mentioned? Take a look at the Croy family castle in the Nederlands, as an example. Anchorite 18:36, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: From the into pgph: During WWII, it came under the dominion of the Nazi occupying force and served as a ghetto for the local Jewish population prior to their liquidation.
Liquidation where?  At the moment it's emotive rather than encyclopedic.  Anyway my knowledge may be hazy but would it not have been occupied by the Russians at some point, at the beginning or end of the war (or both)? Hakluyt bean 16:22, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  'opinion of the natives' in 1939-1941 - he, he, aren't we reading straight from the Stalin, Beria, Molotov's dispatches and the Great Soviet Encyclopedia? This is one of the best jokes I have read in a long time.. pa ka, tavarishch.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DarioTW (talk • contribs) 21:14, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second World War 

message: How is the Mir Castle Complex related to the Litomysl Castle in the Czech Republic???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.213.41.2 (talk) 09:22, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related World Heritage Sites
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Warhammer 40,000/40k Army Page Guidelines

message: I first wanted to make it clear to anyone who has come across these guidelines of a smooth and almost unnoticed transition from "fluff" to "real-world" details as they are somewhat merged and upheld together. 
I have no objections, however, if you want your articles to follow the present form it is in, (though it might irriate me a lot. The last thing we want at all is any "Wikiwar" with articles changing every hour) and otherwise prefer to keep a clear line between "fact" and "fiction". Just keep in mind, writing these guidelines took up 6 hours out of my day into thought.
If you like what you see, suggest changes below this heading and notify the editors of each page and give a link to a page of the article you wish to see follow these guidelines. (And please sign yourself with four "~") Colonel Marksman 18:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Abridgement

message: I like the series as much as anyone, but that doesn't belong here at all. It's a parody series, the only real connection is has to abridgement is the title and the fact that it is shorter. The article explains that the point of abridgement is to maintain as much of the plot as possible while cutting everything that isn't necessary while those series are comedies that ignore basically the entire plot.
 
I think it needs to be removed, but I won't do it without discussing it here first.
 
Jay42 19:07, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am removing the section on "abridgement for anime" it is either unremarkable and would follow other standard understandings of abridgement and therefore would not require its own section, or it is an unrelated parody (as is stated in the soon to be deleted section, and therefore does not belong here.  I take the latter view and I'm taking the initiative to delete.
Antwerp42 19:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Easiest way to solve the Anime Abridged Series debate is to leave in the line about parody that's in the introduction. Question: who edited that in? Raekuul, bringer of Tropes (talk) 23:17, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yu-Gi-Oh? 

message: *100% original research.  Should be removed.  Posting it here first to clear the air before I do anything. JuJube (talk) 02:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abridged as an artform 

message: Why is there nothing on here about any Abridged series?  —Preceding 
*Because Wikipedia doesn't care.
unsigned comment added by 173.13.124.40 (talk) 14:52, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?

message: I've been a long time fan of Mobile Suit Gundam Abridged by GuttedWrenStudios, and I feel that major amounts of content could be written about abridging anime series online.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.208.74.122 (talk) 19:33, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abridging an Anime Series Online
Talk:Interpretation of Schizophrenia

message: I have removed the “Antipsychiatry” category from this article since Arieti used to send some of his patients to the ECT ward.  —Cesar Tort 14:15, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No anti-psychiatrist 

message: Arieti himself was a supporter of physical therapies(anti-psychotic medication, and especially Electroconvulsive therapy, which he used on hebephrenics frequently), as mentioned previously on this page, and was never associated with the anti-psychiatry group unlike Szasz and Laing. I think the anti-psychiatry label should be removed as Arieti was obviously not involved with that movement.
Theoverfloater (talk) 14:03, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the anti-psychiatry label? 

message: I just finished reading all 700 pages of Interpretation of Schizophrenia, the second edition, and felt that this article could use an expansion with more information from the book and better explanations of Arieti's theories and their application on his patients. I hope you find the edits to be of suitable quality. Theoverfloater (talk) 22:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion of the article
Talk:The Golden Bird

message: No citing at all? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.136.87.196 (talk • contribs) 
Sorry, but it make no sense to divide countries to Western and Eastern Europe. After all, vast majority of countries you included into "Eastern" Europe are in fact Central Europe.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:830A:B20D:D300:F188:EE56:C0B8:4C2C (talk) 04:38, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Smithy code

message: This article is ridiculously complex for a layman to read.  If you are unaware of the most basic forms of chypering this article is overwhelming and confusing to read.  None of the terms herein are adequetly explained and the article on the whole is not well explained at all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.65.186.166 (talk) 20:33, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complexity 

message: Um, the proposed solution under "Possible answers" seems rather far-fetched, don't you think? Bromskloss 18:53, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite, Wikipedia is not a place for stuff like this, which is effectively original research and rather useless besides. Please do not use the article as a record of every red herring you've chased down in your personal attempts to solve the code. --Michael Snow 19:07, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculative solution 

message: Can somone please add the external link http://smithycode.wikitimescale.org/
Please follow the link and decide wheater its usefull for this article or not, if you think it's usefull, please add it.
It is a tool to crack the code or try to crack the code (since it already has been cracked). Nothing special, but I had a controversy with an admin about another story and he deleted all my external links, including this one which has nothing to do with the original controversy. I am now no longer allowed by this admin to add this link to this article.
This admin recommended to write this request into the discussion page and wait for someone other who think it's worthy to add this link.
Thank you.
Echalone 20:52, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tool for cracking the code 

message: Given the notability tag on this article - it can be transfered to  if felt more appropriate. Jackiespeel (talk) 09:37, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Tags and transfers

message: :At * No * Point * does the article even approach the most obvious and most basic question: Why?
:Why did the judge feel the need to go to all that trouble, time, etc, when he was meant to be... errr... judging!!!
:Just seems rather contextless. Cheers,
:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:50, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh?
Talk:Robert Milkins

message: I think Rob reached the World Championship last 16 in either 2002 or 2003, can anyone confirm this?
I once heard willie thorne claim in commentry that he had made a 147 in the qualiying rounds and he joked about it not being worth the £147,000 it would have beem had he made it at the crucible.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.203.254.2 (talk) 03:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Added back, because according to the source Thorne hadn't. Armbrust Talk to me about my editsreview 22:36, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Reid (music manager)

message: I just wanted to let anyone who works on this article that he has an entry in the Elton John biography titled Elton John A to Z (I am not really interested in him. I just needed to find his birth year for the John Reid disambiguation page.). I do not know how to make a clean link to the book in Google Books. Here is the link with the search I made. Hopefully it will last. The book's entries are in alphabetical order, so just scroll down. -- Kjkolb 20:53, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  He has an entry in Elton John A to Z 

message: Is this the same John Reid who was in the band Nightcrawlers and co-wrote the song "A Moment like This"? If so, those things ought to be mentioned here and he should be linked to from those pages. If not, then they shouldn't! But as they're both Scottish and both work in music, I just wanted to make sure. anemone│projectors 22:58, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same? 

message: How is the coincidence of two actors playing John Reid in different movies and then both being in Game of Thrones have any significance to an article about Mr. Reid?
Respectfully, perhaps the references are relevant in articles Gillen and Madden, but not Reid? Edokin (talk) 05:41, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular culture section
Talk:The Cross (band)

message: Dude, shouldn't we have an article about The Cross as in the symbol of Christianity? If there's already an article, point me to it. And if there is already an article, then searching "The Cross" should lead to a disambiguation page. 98.209.113.94 (talk) 02:14, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Nominalization

message: "He got an erasure, which was shaped like a Lego." A what? Did somebody mean eraser? 86.154.56.36 (talk) 10:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Erasure

message: I don't know whether this constitues a violation or not, but a few of the examples given seem to be taken verbatim from this book:
Williams, Joseph. Style Toward Clarity and Grace. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Ltd., 1995 (paperback).
Here are the ones I saw which exactly (or closely) matched examples given in the book:
* "The police are conducting an investigation into the matter. The police are investigating the matter." (book p.31)
* "These arguments all depend on a single, unproven claim. This decision can lead to costly consequences." (book p.33)
* "I do not understand either her meaning or his intentions.  I do not understand either what she meant or what he intends." (not identical but very similar, book p.33)
* some of the shorter examples earlier in the article (ex "applicability (from applicable)") but these seem less offending than entire sentences
--WayneMokane 19:01, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright violation
Talk:Willow Run Airport

message: "The B-24H differed from earlier models by having a second rear turret planed in the nose of the aircraft to increase defensive firepower." I think that should be something more like "The B-24H had more defensive fire power than earlier models. This was achieved by fitting a turret in its nose." Or "The B-24H had more defensive fire power than earlier models. This was achieved by replacing the x nose guns with a nose turret holding y guns." I suspect planed was a typo for planned but in this case I'm simply not sure. ϢereSpielChequers 06:42, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: planed/planned

message: Gang, most of the stuff in this article about the manufacturing operations really belongs on the plant's page, Willow Run, not in the article on the airport. If nobody objects, I'm planning to do the heavy lifting over the next few days, as there's been news about the plant. LibertyHiller (talk) 00:39, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major reorg/move proposed 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Shut down period

message: While Shut Down Period could be considered original research, it is definitely notable as it has evolved into a well-known if somewhat localized phenomenon. I will remove the entries that truly are nonsense in the hopes that the essence of truth will be allowed to remain. --Tanner 19:06, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The common standards for determining if any article is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia include such things as verifiability, original research, importance, and notability. Please see What Wikipedia is not and Articles for deletion for additional details. If you want to save this article, please discuss how the article meets these criteria. -- Argon233 T C @ ¶  20:56, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Shut Down Period is indeed true. Although some parts have gone to the degree of being pointless, there are many truths behind the warped views of Shut Down Period. I ask the Admins of Wikipedia to allow the creators of this article to modify the contents of this entry to meet the criteria of Wikipedia. Please allow the creators 7 additional days to modify and change the contents. I assume that upon completion, the revised article will be sumbitted to the Admins of Wikipedia for approval.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dearka (talk • contribs) 2006-04-28 04:22:47.
"Truth" is not the only issue with this article, and efforts to cleanup this article may be in vain if you do not consider some other very important issues. Anyone intrested in saving Shut down period would be wise to read the following articles very carefully:
* Wikipedia:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
* Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day
* Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
* Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
* Wikipedia:No original research
* Wikipedia:Verifiability
* Wikipedia:Importance
* Wikipedia:Notability
Good luck. -- Argon233 T C @ ¶  04:59, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Truth of Shut Down Period
Talk:Fat Bottomed Girls

message: Who's that girl riding the bike? 21:44, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cover

message: The article says that the song is sung by May in the studio, wich is horribly wrong. What a mistake.--85.224.81.244 18:52, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now it says Brian May sang lead on the chorus. Huw Powell (talk) 03:30, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Article

message: I only see 1 statement that is that relevant.....who cares what programmes have used it? Only the controversy related comment seems worthy of the article. Simon Acreman 21:44, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia section

message: I rewrote the POV statement regarding axioms as "serious" subjects. The current version should more adequately convey a neutral standpoint. Cheers. --Coldbourne (talk) 03:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Revised

message: The article states there are numerous cover versions, but it's a dead link. Has that section been removed or just overlooked?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.2.68.116 (talk) 20:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover versions? 

message: Has added Hard rock to the genre section w/o discussion or consensus. Posting here to seek consensus of other page watchers.  - FlightTime (open channel) 01:28, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hard rock
Talk:Good Old-Fashioned Lover Boy

message: (talk • contribs • Bot) 23:55, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Look at the sleeve: it's an EP. 83.85.143.141 (talk) 16:41, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  A ''single''? 

message: Good Old Fashioned Lover Boy was not a single, it was one of four equal-weighted tracks on an EP. The whole article needs an overhaul - if it's about the song, then it should be noted that it's just one of four tracks on the EP - albeit the newest, so when they promoted it on Top of the Pops this was the one they played. If it's about the EP, then it should be properly about the EP. The article as it stands says that this was the third single from A Day At the Races, which it simply wasn't.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:181A:8F00:350E:8489:8782:9A64 (talk) 03:52, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs a major overhaul - not a single 

message: Can anyone point to a possible Musical Hall inspiration for the song as claimed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acorrector (talk • contribs) 19:55, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  So what is the Music Hall inspiration?
Talk:I Want It All (Queen song)

message: Triva: I added a section about Mercury's appearance--hope it's helpful. (Gregsynth (talk) 03:08, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Thanks to the ongoing retail apocalypse phenomenon, as well as websites such as Commercials I Hate and Am I Right, we should remove references to songs used in commercials.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CodyFinke2020 (talk • contribs) 13:52, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing songs from commercials

message: Ifyduittdufyi 218.253.7.91 (talk) 01:53, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yitig 

message: Those could be added to the article. There's an early studio version with a different order of events and a backing track. Jules TH 16 (talk) 09:15, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Versions on The Miracle boxset
Talk:South Kensington

message: I disagree that South Kesington is considered south of the A4, rather it is South of Kesington High Street.
Additionaly, South Kensington is all, not part, of SW7, and some of W8 also.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Akalra1187 (talk • contribs) 20:09, 27 April 2006.
Yes. I'd fully agree with that. Cromwell Road, which disects it, eventually joins up with the M4. Maybe that what they're thinking of. Chelsea Tory 20:58, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I must assert that the South Kensington district is considered almost entirely within the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea.  The exact boundaries of it may be somewhat hazy to most, but speaking as a local resident it is inaccurate representation merely to state that the district is shared evenly between RBKC and Westminster in an archaic opening sentence on this page.  In reality, Westminster's claims to the area are equally recognised as 'Knightsbridge'.  It is acceptable to state that Westminster encompasses a small easterly part of the district (estimate probably 15%) around the Ennismore and Princes Gate Gardens at the top of Exhibition Road, however the vast majority of the district is in RBKC around South Kensington tube station, Old Brompton Road leading down to The Boltons, and Brompton Cross.
UnknownBrick22 (talk) 19:53, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Borough administration
Talk:It's Late

message: I wrote almost all of this article (about one of my favorite songs ever), and I'm very sorry to say that I don't really remember where I learned all of this, so no sources available at the moment... But I know it's all true, at least.--Gustav Lindwall 21:53, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article
Talk:Liar (Queen song)

message: Don't merge this. What's up with all this merging of Queen-singles?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.224.80.23 (talk • contribs) 
:There are a few reasons:
:*The single did not chart anywhere.
:*The article says very little about the song.
:*People are more likely to contribute to the song if its merged with the album's article.
:— miketm - Queen WikiProject - 14:03, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: "Liar" was only released as a single in the US and not the UK, and I think to claim this song as being Queen's second single is slightly misleading.  David French (talk) 11:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Single 

message: It should get a mention for alot of prog rock bass players its a very influential piece.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.11.53.25 (talk) 22:38, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bass solo 

message: John Deacon appears making backing vocals in the part when Mercury is singing "Mamma, I gonna be your slave".--Guto Valente (talk) 16:42, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deacon also sings backing vocals 

message: i don’t think it’s necessary to have it there and i think it’s better have a composition one there to make the paragraph above the info box not so big and crowded Imagine offline (talk) 06:11, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music video subheading 
Talk:Mustapha (song)

message: What language is song this in? 68.175.83.141 (talk) 13:31, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is some debate, but it is presumably English, Arabic and Parsi (http://en.allexperts.com/q/Queen-566/2008/4/Lyrics-Mustapha.htm, http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/archive/index.php/t-145490.html) --81.62.244.66 (talk) 14:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: *Farsi--Boris Baran - ✉ 18:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language? 

message: I removed the wholly uncited original research Interpretations section after a brief google search. Google found one Circus magazine interview from 1978 December and Google Scholar found, inside a basic musicology course text, Helmut Rösing's chapter discussing the song: Musikwissenschaft. Ein Grundkurs, 1998, see pages 8 and 9 under the section Exotische Zutat (translation: exotic ingredient). My inexpert cropped translation: The song begins with an imitated Muezzin's call to prayer before continuing in a familiar pop-rock style. The theme song suggests Arabic-Islamic singing. But the musical approach is one of exotic exaggeration... I used the interview as cite for "Hebrew rocker", although I've no idea what that means. Helmut Rösing's discussion looks reliable enough to source claims that the song lyrics imitate Islamic singing, but I leave that to other editors. -84user (talk) 11:34, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculations 

message: What exactly is an "up-tempo Hebrew rocker"? I don't find any connection to anything Jewish.
ICE77 (talk) 07:57, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Up-tempo Hebrew rocker 

message: the external link to queen's official site is broken: http://www.queenonline.com/en/the-band/discography/jazz/#lyrics 
80.99.38.199 (talk) 17:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  broken link
Talk:Now I'm Here

message: I doubt the Chuck Berry reference is deliberate. Martin Packer 20:19, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the song is full of Chuck Berry guitar phrases, the "queenie" quote can't be coincidence. I rather doubt that organ sound is a real organ. To me it sounds like a piano with truncated attacks (sort of compressor pumping) sent through a Leslie, the same piano as in the guitar solo. It could also be an "attackless" guitar, like the one in Liar which also sounds like an organ. --Suaheli (talk) 06:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed my mind on those organ sounds. It's most likely a real organ, indeed. And in Liar, too! --Suaheli (talk) 03:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

message: Someone said the song had an interpolation of a Rolling Stones song (near the end of the track)...is this true? --123.2.142.50 (talk) 00:16, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homage to the Rolling Stones?
Talk:Save Me (Queen song)

message: Hi there, i've corrected the details about the Save Me video being the last to feature Freddie Mercury without his trademark moustache until February 1987 when he eventually shaved it off during the video shoot for his music video The Great Pretender, although i think Mercury briefly shaved it off for the ballet scenes in the I Want to Break Free video in 1984, but later had it back on again after that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.56.206 (talk) 06:35, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Save Me Video