lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ina May Gaskin

message: There are a range of Wikipedia sources that can help you out. All articles must meet WP:V. To learn how to a proper citing style, consult WP:CITE. For what kind of external links are acceptable, WP:EL is a useful set of guidelines.  Good luck! GBYork 18:07, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: [removed blacklisted link] Disguised Rosencomet link. So I removed it to make her article more professional without such links lowering its credibility.  Timmy12 22:22, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree, and have returned it. Please see admin Samir's talk page, where he states that the links to rosencomet.com are valid citations. Ekajati (yakity-yak) 22:39, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm an admin too, and yet funnily enough my opinion is worth no more than yours, Timmy's or anybody else's. The key point here AFAIC is that this an article on Ina May Gaskin not an article on every event she ever attended (she's a popular speaker, right?). A secondary point is that the link in this article was not of citation quality - it was a link to a search page. I've removed it. --kingboyk 11:26, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article seems credible w/o disguised Rosencomet link 
Talk:Vlastimil Hort

message: The German page on Hort states that he moved to Germany in the late seventies (playing professionally for a German club) and kept his Czechoslovakian (later czech) citizenship until now. According to that page Hort only took up German citizenship in 1986 and kept playing for the Czechoslovakian side for a long time after his move. That would contradict the defection claim made in this article. 194.246.46.15 (talk) 08:48, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defected?
Talk:Vlastimil Horváth

message: However interesting it may be, etymological information is of little relevance, if any at all. Should anyone feel the urge to include that kind of data, links to the respective articles dealing with names will more than suffice, I believe. ;-) Feel free, however, to include any accomplishments, awards, albums and the like, as they are exactly the sort of articles that should be included. Thank you. --Pětušek 11:23, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Good comment, thanks for bringing this up. I have removed the sentence. - Darwinek (talk) 19:54, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevant information
Talk:Vlatko Stefanovski

message: A Serbian friend of mine says that Mr. Stefanovski is currently teaching at an American university, but does not know which one. Can anyone confirm/deny this and if confirmed, tell us which university? Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.32.143.49 (talk) 23:53, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Shades of pink

message: It has been suggested that Category:Shades of organge be moved to either Category:Variations of organge or Category:Varieties of organge.  Where this move to go through all Shades of ... categories and their associated templates should also be moved.  The discussion is here. Jimp 01:46, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving to ''Variations/Varieties of ...''

message: Currently there is a link to a color called Japanese Pink on this template. The link is to a subsection of Rose (color). However, there is a problem. On the rose page there is no subsection called Japanese Pink. What do we do about it? Remove the color? Darth Newdar (talk) 14:49, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: C'mon - somebody talk to me! Darth Newdar (talk) 16:25, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

text: I removed it from the template. As an aside, I'm of the opinion that only colors with stand alone articles and not 'sub'-shades should appear on the navigational templates. PaleAqua (talk) 17:52, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese Pink

message: Apricot is linked in the pink navigational template, but on the article it says it is 'Apricot is a light yellowish-orangeish color' and makes no mention of pink. Should it be removed, or should pink be added to the article? 124.184.79.125 (talk) 17:49, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Apricot
Talk:Ginger Baker's Air Force

message: Jazz-fusion is a bit of a stretch. This group's music was more like pop afro-funk.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.212.7.70 (talk) 17:21, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 
Template talk:Shades of white

message: It has been suggested that Category:Shades of organge be moved to either Category:Variations of organge or Category:Varieties of organge.  Where this move to go through all Shades of ... categories and their associated templates should also be moved.  The discussion is here. Jimp 02:16, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving to ''Variations/Varieties of ...''
Talk:Voja Antonić

message: I made two corrections. First, his date of birth is July 12 (Serbian format), not December 7. Second, I made a note about his non-working site and provided a link to the Archive.org snapshot. 82.208.235.171 (talk) 03:08, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two corrections 

message: Voja Antonic is not notable as a cellular automatist.  The only reference to his work in this field is his own website supposedly describing work on a machine to display Conway's Game of Life on an 8x8 matrix of LEDs.  This does not qualify as notable.  I will remove the category, Cellular automatists. Fartherred (talk) 18:13, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect categorization

message: www.paralax.rs seems to be a dead link, and it is most of the links in this article (also, it's the subject's website so this is not WP:RS).  We need new, independent, references.  RJFJR (talk) 20:02, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead links
Talk:Jesse Wolf Hardin

message: There are a range of Wikipedia sources that can help you out. All articles must meet WP:V. To learn how to a proper citing style, consult WP:CITE. For what kind of external links are acceptable, WP:EL is a useful set of guidelines.  Good luck!  GBYork 18:09, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am both the creator of and major contributor to this article. I don't think the subject has made any really controversial edits, and I bow to his preference as to the tenor of the article and his perception that some of my edits have given it an apparent bias that was inaccurate. I don't think he has any other editors changing his edits or objecting to them, and I don't intend to make any edits of that kind, though I may correct grammar and punctuation or supply a citation or two when one is requested. I think the prod should be taken down pending some actual disagreement about something; there will be none from me anymore now that I am satisfied that the editor calling himself Jesse Hardin actually IS Jesse Hardin. I only reverted what I did because I thought it was AGAINST the subject's wishes. Other editors are free, of course, to edit as they see fit, but I don't think the prod is needed at this time.Rosencomet (talk) 18:02, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: COI by Subject
Template talk:Shades of cyan

message: Does adding this template to a page automatically add it to the shades of cyan category? Because the page for category: shades of cyan includes itself as a sub category
:Yes, it does, but I've adjusted these templates to allow for this automatic inclusion to be turned off.  If you want the template on a page without having that page listed in the category, use .  Note that this works of all shades of ... templates.  Note also that it doesn't have to be yes: you could use y, 1, X, を or any character. Jimp 03:21, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Automatic inclusion into category

message: It has been suggested that Category:Shades of organge be moved to either Category:Variations of organge or Category:Varieties of organge.  Where this move to go through all Shades of ... categories and their associated templates should also be moved.  The discussion is here. Jimp 03:21, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving to ''Variations/Varieties of ...''

message: Since cyan is a subset of blue in English, why are the colors in this template not a subset of 'shades of blue'? Several, such as cyan itself, appear neither in that chart nor in 'shades of green'. And the colors which are included do not form a coherent unit. kwami (talk) 08:05, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  why not a subset of blue & green?
Talk:Girl You Know It's True

message: There are -at least, two different pressings of this album. Both of them include the songs in the same order, but four of them are different mixes in the second pressing:
Track 2. Baby Don't Forget My Number (4:16 vs 6:28): The second pressing (6:28 version) contains samples of Laid Back's "White Horse".
Track 3. More Than You'll Ever Know (4:32 vs 4:00): The second pressing (4:00 version) has a different middle, more overdubs and a cold ending.
Track 5. Take It As It Comes (4:15 vs 3:41): The second pressing (3:41) has new lyrics in the second verse. 
Track 9. I'm Gonna Miss You (4:24 vs 3:57): The second pressing (3:57) is an edited version.
These four different versions are in turn different from the European release of this album (1989), and also different from the original European album (1988).
  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.47.59.66 (talk) 02:37, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

message: Girl You Know It's True was only 7 weeks at No.1 (and not 8). On the Dec. 30 1989 Phil Collins' ...But Seriously was No.1. The last week when Girl You Know It's True was No.1 was the Jan. 13 1990. In the printed paper of the Billboard magazine (page 74) from Jan 13 1990 it is written that it was the 7th week at No.1 for Girl You Know It's True:
https://www.americanradiohistory.com/Archive-Billboard/90s/1990/BB-1990-01-13.pdf
1st week: Sept. 23 1989,
2nd week: Sept. 30 1989,
3rd week: Nov. 25 1989,
4th week: Dec. 02 1989,
5th week: Dec. 09 1989,
6th week: Dec. 23 1989,
7th week: Jan. 13 1990.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schorsch.landmann (talk • contribs) 21:47, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The album was only 7 weeks at No.1 

message: Here it's written June but on the page about the single itself it's written November. What is right? 2A00:801:7B9:4BC6:4B71:CD0D:FDC3:AB81 (talk) 15:37, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date for Girl You Know It's True? 

message: Guitars:
Ike Turner
"The Ike Turner"? of Tina Turner?  because Ike Turner here placed without a link (not in blue written) Musicworldvision (talk) 22:01, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personnel  Session musicians  IKE TURNER?
Talk:Volker Schlöndorff

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article.-- Jreferee 18:39, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Give Me Immortality or Give Me Death

message: Unrelated to quality, but rather a question of source:  The article claims that the eyeball hat references are in part references to The Residents.  In this interview,  David Ossman says:
That's a funny story. We were writing, and as sometimes happens, we get weird catalogs in the mail. And this catalog, whatever it was, came in, and Phil Proctor said, "Look at this. Look at these eyeball hats." And we saw this picture of this gooney guy wearing this green eyeball hat, and it was just so funny. We immediately ordered four eyeball hats. [Laughs] We said, "We've got to have these . . . we've got to have these . . . these hats mean something somehow." So we ordered these four hats from the catalog and it just became something that entered the world of the album in many ways. "Eyeball" became "Ebola," the CBS eyeball, it just wrote itself in. It became, "Who are the guys in the eyeball hats? Who exactly are they?" Well, that's one of the puzzles of the album, is who the guys with the eyeball hats are. It's one of those unknowns in the album, because there's really no way that you can truly find out. We never reveal who the guys in the eyeball hats are. Actually, the eyeball hats are an extreme mud boarding sports [thing]. It's like a snow board thing, and they're made by a perfectly reputable company of young people in Colorado. I sent them a copy of the album saying, "I hope you enjoy it." They've got their eyeball hats plastered all over it. [Laughs] I don't know what they're going to think. I haven't heard from them, which kind of amazes me! 
It could be that, as part of "writing itself in," The Residents get a nod, but it seems like it could be a stretch too.  Do we have a source for that speculation, or is it the speculation of the person who wrote it in the Wikipedia article? --Mr z 15:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was being tentative when I wrote that. Please note that I wrote "seems" rather than claiming anything. If I am alone in seeing the association, then the passage should be deleted; but if other people might be similarly misled, then your clarification might be worth adding to the article. Richard K. Carson (talk) 06:57, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eyeball hats
Template talk:Shades of red

message: It has been suggested that Category:Shades of organge be moved to either Category:Variations of organge or Category:Varieties of organge.  Where this move to go through all Shades of ... categories and their associated templates should also be moved.  The discussion is here. Jimp 01:54, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving to ''Variations/Varieties of ...''
Talk:Volodymir Gustov

message: Google count for Gustov cervelo is 13,000; for Hustov cervelo it is 152.  His employers use a G, as did his previous employers, and as do the TdF site, the UCI, cycling news, cycling weekly ...   Really seems to be very little evidence for the current (Hustov) name of the article. Kevin McE (talk) 07:42, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gustov/Hustov 

message: Penultimate letter of forename on team site, UCI, cycling news etc is I, not Y.
Using "cervelo" to eliminate other Voloym(i/y)r (G/H)ustovs, Google gives: 
*i/G  3,510 hits
*i/H  0 hits
*y/H  165 hits
*y/G  568 hits
Page moved in accordance with 82.7% of the hits.  Kevin McE (talk) 07:57, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's just how someone wrote his name one day and it stuck. And for the ease of readers, there are wiki guidelines which tell us to use the most recognizable name for a subject (c.f. Wladimir Klitschko -- this is an article on the English Wikipedia, and we know he is Ukrainian, however, that is how the Germans transliterated his name and now most readers would be familiar with seeing the first variant rather than the "more correct" Volodymyr Klychko variant. Same here with Volodymir Gustov... --ddima (talk) 08:37, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Volodymir/Volodymyr
Talk:Glasgow Sunday

message: Anyone fancy taking a look at the Overview section? It's an excitable journalistic review rather than an actual overview. It is an important album in Jandek's canon and something should be said to place it in proper context but this version needs Wikified or even redone from scratch. If no-one responds, I'll have a go myself but I would warn that I would be scrapping the majority of what's here just now. Ac@osr 17:32, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Von Hayes

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article.-- Jreferee 22:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment

message: What bad act did he commit? "Infamous" is not a fancy synonym for famous. 141.154.55.72 (talk) 19:19, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It was trivia/original research. Removed. Thanks. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 19:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infamous? 

message: Was the trade controversial just because it was 5 for 1? It is mentioned as being a big deal on this and Julio Franco's article. Perhaps, 5 for 1 was much less common at the time. WesUGAdawg (talk) 13:28, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Garbage from an IP in 2006 .  Removed from this article and Julio Franco --CutOffTies (talk) 13:54, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  5 for 1
Talk:March 2-4-0

message: Pity this wasn't developed further - I'd love to know whether the car would have had insurmountable levels of understeer at speed, with those rear wheels basically keeping it in a straight line... 121.216.102.74 (talk) 06:28, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pity 

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyrrell_P34
"Contrary to popular belief, the idea of the smaller front tyres was not to have a smaller "frontal area" to reduce drag, as the frontal area was still determined by the width of the standard-sized rear slicks. In fact, the six-wheel design reduced the lift caused by two larger front wheels, improving frontal downforce, increased the total contact patch of the front tyres and created a greater swept area for the brake discs."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_2-4-0
"The thinking behind the Tyrrell P34 was that this drag effect could be reduced by using smaller diameter tyres at the front. At the time, conventional F1 front wheels would measure around 16" (40 cm) diameter but Tyrrell planned to use just 10" (25 cm) diameter wheels. The corresponding loss of front-end grip was overcome by incorporating two front wheels per side thus actually increasing grip as well as decreasing drag. The design incorporated a system whereby all four front wheels could steer the car."
Neither statement is referenced, so pick your favourite LOL :)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.205.250.57 (talk) 13:34, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tyrell 

message: Is this subject named 'March 2ndash4hyphen0', or is it 'March 2hyphen4hyphen0'? It seems there is an inconsistency between the title, which is the latter, and the body text, which indicates it is the former. --Ohconfucius ¡digame! 04:15, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's 'March 2hyphen4hyphen0' (like the locomotive wheel arrangement) - the ndashes were introduced by a bot. I've fixed them. Nice pickup. DH85868993 (talk) 10:56, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification on the name 
Talk:Von Wafer

message: The altercation has been reported widely on national and regional sports networks, so I don't see why it it should not be included in the article. People will obviously search for information on Wikipedia for it and I'd say getting in a fist fight with a player on one's own team is a notable feature of a career.--TM 05:42, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If we do mention it, we should at least try to say something specific, and explain the significance. The sentence that was in the article was vague and poorly written. Zagalejo^^^ 05:45, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  go a long way to help do that if you are so inclined.--TM 06:43, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Altercation with Delonte West 
Talk:Vreni Schneider

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article.-- Jreferee 20:27, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: The figure of merit to come to this assessment is undefined. If it's by number of world cup victories, she just turned fourth. Pkoppenb (talk) 12:59, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd most successful racer 
Talk:Samuel Doak

message: Article would be clearer with added heading before "Doak delivered the following sermon…" Suggest "Battle of Kings Mountain" or some such. OR, move those two paras (closing with "LORD AND GIDEON. AMEN." under CAREER heading. As it stands, it looks like the Kings Mountain material is part of Abolition efforts.
--DET (talk) 00:32, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization and Headings 

message: * This lengthy prayer attributed verbatim to Doak simply did not exist before 1895 when Theodore Roosevelt was writing his book (along with historian Henry Cabot Lodge) Hero Tales from American History, nor was this verbatim Doak prayer cited by historian Lyman C. Draper within his 1881 copyright book King's Mountain and It's Heroes, nor was the verbatim Doak prayer (as presented within this Wikipedia article) ever recorded within J. G. M. Ramsey's The Annals of Tennessee.In his book King's Mountain and It's Heroes, Draper only cites a "few stirring remarks" and "closing with the Bible quotation, "The sword of the Lord and Gideon;" within a footnote referencing a June 21, 1880 letter from J. G. M. Ramsey who attributes only this barest citation almost one hundred years after the supposed September 25, 1780 Doak prayer at Sycamore Shoals to "the tradition of this country, and I fully believe it."
Bee Cliff River Slob (talk) 18:17, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supposed 1780 Doak prayer at Sycamore Shoals 

message: The above portrait was prominently featured in the article. It is on display at Tusculum College and is apparently assumed to be an accurate portrait. There is no information about its provenance. I raised some concerns about it on its Wikimedia Commons talk page. 
First of all, this is a modern copy of an earlier work that is also apparently anonymous. Here's an image of the earlier work, as displayed with the Tennessee Encyclopedia article about Samuel Doak: (Portrait of Samuel Doak). Comparing the two makes it plain that the Tusculum College painting is based on the work shown at Tennessee Encyclopedia. 
The modern copyist made serious interpretive errors. The main errors in the copy are: 
# Where the original work shows a man with longish white hair covering his ears and adhering to the top and sides of his head, the copy shows a man with a kind of white hood that completely covers his hair. (In fact, the hood seems to be attached to the garment under his waistcoat, suggesting a modern hoodie). 
# Where the man in the original wears a loosely tied neckband like a cravat, the copy has a vaguely sketched necktie with a four-in-hand knot — an anachronism, to say the least.
Therefore, with apologies to Tusculum College, this portrait is not a reliable portrayal of its subject and should not be treated as a historical image. Therefore it does not belong with the article. — ℜob C. alias ALAROB 18:31, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I removed the portrait
Talk:J.U.F. (album)

message: Should "Jewish" be in German? Xemxi 12:31, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It would appear from the looks of the band's site that "Ukrainishe" should be in English.  I am not familiar with this group.  Hopefully the page creater can clear this up. Sampm 05:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As their official bandpage is located at http://www.myspace.com/jewishukrainianfreundschaft, it's quite clear the it should be in fact "ukrainian".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.101.7.83 (talk) 20:13, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish-Ukrainishe Freundschaft? 

message: Should the album info listed here be transferred to a page of its own?  This may take the chance of neither article being notable, but I think it would be appropriate. Sampm 05:12, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seperate page for album? 

message: this isn't a studio album!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.26.49.48 (talk) 13:38, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, it's a studio album released by an artist called J.U.F. that happens to contain people from two other acts. A split album is by two totally different acts who do not appear on each other's songs. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:14, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a split album!
Talk:Gold Mother

message: It has been bothering me for some time that none of the versions in the article had the same tracks in the same order as the copy I own.  So I fixed it.  Main source was discogs;  specifically Gold Mother and James.  82.13.91.100 (talk) 08:59, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  There are at least 26 versions of this album!