Talk:Soyuz-2

message: The article leaves me confused about the optional Ikar stage. The infobox currently reads in part:
"Third Stage (Optional) - Ikar ... Thrust 2.94 kN (66,093 LBf)"
Maybe the kN or the LBf is off by a factor of 10. But which? Sdsds 04:12, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be 294 kN. I've changed it. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 11:51, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It most certainly shouldn't be 294kN, that's more thrust than a Centaur. The sneaky f'ing russian forum that I googled suggests 2943N / 662 lbf. But perhaps someone could find a more reliable official source.--211.30.213.51 12:16, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ikar confusion 

message: The Soyuz FG is a version of the Soyuz-2 rocket (they are all derived from the Soyuz-U). There is not really enough difference to have a seperate article for it, so I am suggesting that the Soyuz FG article is merged into this one. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 13:30, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Soyuz-FG vs Soyuz 2

message: Media reports indicate RADARSAT-2 was launched by a Soyuz FG, not by a Soyuz 2. Assuming these are different types of rockets, can we safely remove the reference to RADARSAT-2 from this article? (sdsds - talk) 08:42, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that can go. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 17:09, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RADARSAT-2 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was withdrawn to allow discussion on the issue of rocket article disambiguation in general, not just specific cases. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 17:58, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Oppose the Soyuz rocket is at Soyuz launch vehicle. This should be named to match - Soyuz-2 launch vehicle family (or without family). 70.55.85.225 (talk) 04:55, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Oppose the Soyuz rocket is at Soyuz launch vehicle. This should be named to match - Soyuz-2 launch vehicle family (or without family). 70.55.85.225 (talk) 04:55, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I put back detailed description of variants. I understand that in present form it mostly duplicates information that is already in the intro, so this should be sorted out. Still, because the article uses 2.1a and 2.1b names, they must be described.
Also, fairing types should be described.Mikus (talk) 03:56, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variants 

message: It would be nice to have some information about what caused the partial failure of the one launch. What was the result, as well.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.214.221.153 (talk) 02:14, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partial Failure 

message: Looking at the source on the launch that is listed as a failure, it seems that it was the satellite that failed, *not* the launcher, thus it should be listed as a success for Soyuz-2.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.118.88.25 (talk) 21:31, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meridian Failure 

message: The link to the BLITS satellite payload is incorrect, it takes you to an unrelated page about sound. A page containing information on the BLITS payload doesn't seem to exist.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by G.k.dub (talk • contribs) 15:23, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Links 

message: Progress MS-3 is missing in the list!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.9.127.219 (talk) 08:16, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Progress MS-03 was launched on a Soyuz-U, so it doesn't belong here. Oefe (talk) 20:52, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  that dont belongs here in this article.--Bolzanobozen (talk) 15:44, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing flight 

message: Flight 68 appeared to succeed but at least 9 of 72 cubesats were DOA http://spacenews.com/astro-digital-announces-first-cubesats-launched-on-soyuz-failed/ and an earlier article indicated that at least 2 cubesats were delivered to the wrong orbit http://spacenews.com/soyuz-launch-customers-search-for-cause-of-cubesat-failures/ ... I don't think this counts as a "partial failure" for the launch, but it's definitely worth adding a note in the launch table. Greg (talk) 17:21, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: And now it's definitely a partial failure, Glavcosmos agrees. Another ref. http://spacenews.com/mysteries-surrounding-july-14-soyuz-flight-solved-not-quite/ someone updated the article before I got there. Greg (talk) 18:00, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flight 68 aftermath 

message: There is already a GLONASS-M 755 satellite in space. It was launched on 14 June 2014. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosmos_2500  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.9.125.100 (talk) 07:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I have removed it from the list of scheduled launches (and also updated that list); it was probably an error in the source. — JFG talk 11:48, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  GLONASS-M 755 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Soyuz-2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5mqiUXlX2?url=http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/soyuz.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/soyuz.htm
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5mqiUXlX2?url=http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/soyuz.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/soyuz.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:21, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Where did you read about this? Never heard of it. — JFG talk 21:33, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: @JFG few references to it in non-public FLPP documents, they want to increase the launch cadence to reduce costs and the A62 will takeover the medium launch performance segment that Soyuz currently fills in their launcher lineup, particularly as the market is moving to GEO communication satellites heavier than Soyuz can launch. After the O3B constellation launches which Soyuz is ideal for (4x700kg to MEO) they only booked one more flight for Kourou last year (which has A62 as contracted backup), the bulk of the OneWeb launches (32-36 200kg LEO) will be from  Baikonur. --WatcherZero (talk) 07:19, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, this is very informative. There are some hints about this policy change in the interview of two CNES officials that you added at Adeline (rocket stage). Perhaps we should cite this even if it's not a high-quality source, better than nothing. Should be attributed and conditional. — JFG talk 07:27, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  — JFG talk 07:39, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

text: Lol, I think its a mark of respect to editors that when asked about Ariane 6 performance in that interview the assistant director of CNES says you can look it up on Wikipedia. WatcherZero (talk) 09:17, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that was nuts, as Wikipedians would tell him "go back to sources"!  — JFG talk 09:27, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tropical Soyuz cancelled after Ariane 6?? 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Soyuz-2's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "sfn":
From Kosmos 2522: 
From 2017 in spaceflight: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:09, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Soyuz-2]]