lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Welcomenh

message: Please add the following:
 
 ----
 
 ==See also==
 * Template:Welcome
 
-- Zondor 04:44, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. howcheng  {chat} 18:39, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Done. howcheng  {chat} 07:49, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  link to {{tl|welcome}} 

message: Have the <noinclude> directly after the non-breaking space on the same line and with no space in between, I experimented with it and doing this solves a problem where a space is put after the template. Thanks! --WikiSlasher 04:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  J Di talk 17:48, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix template 

message: Please see Template_talk:Welcome#Suggesting_wording_change_to_simplify -SCEhardT 02:28, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed wording change 

message: Could an administrator transclude the documentation subpage to the main template? Thanks. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 348° 59' 30" NET 23:15, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts?   01:06, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

text: WOSlinker (talk) 17:54, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documentation
Talk:Bharat Rashtra Samithi

message: Merging will take place soon if no objections. Ekantik talk 01:20, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: The political position in the infobox was not cited. In an edit Special:Diff/1030912919/1031114354, it was changed from centre-left to centre-right. What are the sources for either of them? -- DaxServer (talk) 09:51, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the political position? 

message: Hi, Since the party renamed itself as Bharat Rashtra Samithi, should we replace the word Telangana with Bharat in the election articles prior to 2022 since this article already provides the fact that the party has been renamed itself. Other alternative is to continue using the word Telangana in election articles prior to 2022 and using the word Bharat in the election articles after 2022 for historical purposes. 
Personally I come to a opinion that we should follow the second alternative instead of replacing the name Telangana with Bharat in articles prior to 2022 so that the historical factor is preserved and respected. Please put in your opinions so that we can reach to a concensus to maintain consistency among the articles. 456legend (talk) 06:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @456legend Agree with 2nd alternative. No change should be made to earlier election/ assembly pages. Dhruv edits (talk) 09:46, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical name usage in articles?
Talk:Baire function

message: Can someone add an example of a Class 3 function? Eric Kvaalen (talk) 18:58, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid, this is rather hard; see , and maybe the first item in , and Theorem 2.7 in , and the last page in: H.H.Pu, H.W.Pu and T.H.Teng, "Symmetric and approximate symmetric derivatives for symmetric functions" (1979), and .Boris Tsirelson (talk) 11:30, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

text: Really, there is an old good way to construct a class n set for every finite n (and even not finite...); transition from sets to functions should not be hard (relatively...). Some explanation of that way are available in Sect.1c of this course. However, for class 1 and class 2 we have much simpler examples. The question is, whether for class 3 we still have a "special" example much simpler than the "general" one. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 16:43, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

text: See "On a hierarchy of Borel additive subgroups of reals" by Ashutosh Kumar, a preprint of 2009 available here. For now, not a reliable source... Boris Tsirelson (talk) 14:14, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

text: See also Sect. 3 in Kumar's thesis available from the site of Steffen Lempp. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 14:44, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Class 3

message: The Cantor set example is wrong (it is of Baire Class 1, not 2); I tried to give the right example, but somebody, without any discussion, reverted it back to the wrong example.
The right example is in Oxtoby's book, p. 33.
Manta (talk) 13:26, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Class 2
Talk:Volga–Don Canal

message: It would be useful to know the maximum size vessels that can transit the canal.  --  Geo Swan 06:01, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Length, Width, Depth?
Talk:Aqua (Asia album)

message: The article had Grant Hart listed as a co-writer on one songs and his surname listed on another. I looked this up in the ASCAP and BMI databases. Grant Vernon Hart is represented by BMI. The song "Lay down your arms" is represented by ASCAP, and the songwriter with the surname Hart listed is Gregory Nigel Hart. The other song, "A Far Cry" does not come up in either database. No other songwriting credits are listed for Gregory Nigel Hart. This leads me to believe that the song is not written by Grant Hart.--Larrybob (talk) 19:25, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Grant Hart as co-writer? Probably not.
Talk:Logan Huntzberger

message: okay, the info is all great and such, but a picture really needs to be added.
:I agree, but let's not add a picture just for the sake of adding a picture.  I just removed logangilmore.jpg because, aside from not being a particularly good photo, it has a giant blank spot on the right edge.  Furthermore, the copyright status is unknown.  There have got to be plenty of images that are better than that one that will not infringe copyright.  I will keep up the search, but others should do so as well.  -Pjorg 00:13, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: PICTURE NEEDED
Talk:James Hogue

message: Same guy.
http://www.kpho.com/Global/story.asp?S=4457693&nav=23Ku
http://www.telluridewatch.com/archive_news/2006/january/012006/hogue.htm
( by anon - text removed to avoid possible copyvio)
* Good. Link to the news in the article would have been enough. - Skysmith 11:05, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article
Talk:Craig Janney

message: That should be mentioned somewhere in this article.  Seeing him decide to sit home rather then play for the Vancouver Canucks during that one season was quite arrogant of him.  Then seeing the Blues, have to trade to get him back was quite ridiculous.  Only Craig would do this.
--Pstrife (talk) 23:45, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Craig Janney's bias towards playing in Canada
Talk:Queen's York Rangers (1st American Regiment)

message: The text is mostly the same as the History section of http://qyrang.org/qyrhist.htm. I have reverted to the last good version. See [history] for the deleted text. Its entry on the copyvio list can be seen here. Greentubing 06:17, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Investigating the website, it seems to be a regimental website rather than a government-endorsed one, so on the face of it I see no claim for crown copyright either. Greentubing 06:22, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio?

message: Officialy the regiment is founded in 1866.http://www.cmp-cpm.forces.gc.ca/dhh-dhp/his/ol-lo/vol-tom-3/par1/arm-bli/QYR-eng.asp 84.23.155.84 (talk) 08:59, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  1866 not 1756 
Talk:Securities and Exchange Board of India

message: THe section below External Links and Stub message should be here... hence moving it here
"It is incorrect to state that till recently SEBI lacked the legal expertise needed to sustain prosecutions/enforcement actions. It is doing injustice to the dedicated team of legal professionals who have been working in SEBI's legal department on permanent basis. The recruitment from top law campuses has started way back in 1994. It is fatually incorrect to state that it has recently started recruiting from top law campuses. It is doubtful whether it has found reasonable success in such recruitment. It is a different case whetmployment Echange laws."
Vivek 11:04, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  discuss on talk page 

message: One or sebi more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Whpq (talk) 13:29, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Propose a new section for significant events, rulings, milestones. We can also contemplate expanding on early days, how SEBI gets its teeth, etc. Basically, think like a student asked to do a 10 page report on SEBI. Nshuks7 (talk) 07:46, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: New section for significant events/milestones
Talk:Henry Bain sauce

message: I am pretty sure (as of 3 years ago) that you could still buy Henry Bains sauce in Louisville.  I did a google search and found a website that sells a Henry Bains sauce.  Maybe the original editor meant to say that the official Pendennis Club recipie is no longer bottled and sold?  Biomedeng 17:17, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  henry bains sauce for sale 
Talk:Ghot

message: ...yes, it's non-notable; but there's also a separate, distinct article for every one of hundreds of Pokémons. See Ho-Oh, :Category:Flying Pokémon, :Category:Pokémon species by type, &c. These articles look completely worthless (and copyvios) but we've got 'em. John Reid 06:31, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I agree but...
Talk:Chris Sawyer's Locomotion

message: Are interchange stations between two train lines allowed?
:Yes; just build a two or more track station and run the lines through different platforms. smurrayinchester(User), (Talk) 07:32, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Interchange Stations

message: Is there a place that you can down load maps or exchange them —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 125.236.189.209 (talk) 10:22, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, take a look on locomotion-fanpage.net or tt-forums.net 85.164.119.2 17:56, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SC5 Files 

message: I'm removing this list. It doesn't really add anything to the article and only serves to artificially extend the length of the article. If a game site has the list it can be linked to, but its unnecessary in the article.--Crossmr 21:09, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scenario list removal 

message: I have to say, that Chris has changed since rct1 and 2, the scenarios on this game are much easier, and from his "woe on him" stunned demo he seems to have been money hungry and rushed this out. Can't even find this game most places, let alone know if Chris Sawyer is even still alive... Very dissappointed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.196.20.248 (talk) 02:26, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Okay

message: this article used to make this game look good, like it is. now there isnt even any reference to the massive amounts of quality player made mods out there. should I add some pictures of awesome trains for this game?  Noofnoof (talk) 08:29, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  what happened? 

message: Also ties into 'what happened' above.  Can we get a sense of whether the negative reception is stated to only be from back at the instant that it was released on Steam, or from what point in time, and whether the negative reception is no longer true with all game's community's activity on Steam from 2015 to current.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.34.128.118 (talk) 23:10, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  regarding Reception section
Talk:Gezhouba Dam

message: The article currently reads:
:"The navigation lock No. 2 on the third channel was, when built, one of the largest in the world."
At 280 meters it is slightly longer than a Seawaymax lock.  But its depth, at five metres, is just 60% that of the St Lawrence Seaway.  The largest vessel to traverse the Seaway was 28,000 tons.  There are over a dozen locks on the Seaway.  The Panama Canal, Manchester Ship Canal and the Kiel Canal also have larger capacity locks.  --  Geo Swan 06:46, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of the largest locks in the World? 

message: shouldn't it be "gezhou dam" as 'ba' means dam in chinese  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.180.26.63 (talk) 15:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  gezhou dam 

message: "The reservoir has a total volume of 1,580 m3 (55,797 cu ft)." is obviously wrong, because that's the volume of a large swimming pool, not the volume of a 3,11GW hydroplan... --Pcmadman (talk) 09:08, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. It should be 1.58 km3. It is fixed now. Beagel (talk) 09:30, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  1580m³? 
Talk:Clones of Kyo Kusanagi

message: profiles need aligning.--Dangerous-Boy 07:02, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't quite understand what you mean by that statement. Could you be more specific..? -ZeroTalk 11:58, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, i've discovered why the profiles need alignment: when you removed the cats and did some "categorizing", you inadvertedly ruined the template allignmet. Please don't do it agian. -ZeroTalk 11:51, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. --Dangerous-Boy 07:38, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  pics
Talk:Västerbotten

message: I've now several times had notions of the historical province Västerbotten deleted. e.g.  and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=V%C3%A4sterbotten&diff=37734669&oldid=37643254
]. As the only one in support of this, I'll leave it out for now, but it should be noted that this has indeed been written, for those he consider the current version not sufficiently POV. / Fred-Chess 07:28, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I have merged Umeå Court District into here, since the notability of that article had been questioned. In fact the article was a very short stub without sources, so the information is probably best presented here. 
I noticed that there are a number of similar articles, linked from the "Historical jurisdiction" section, which are also mostly unexpanded stub. Perhaps these could also be merged. --B. Wolterding 08:53, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Court districts
Wikipedia talk:Verifiability/truth

message: "If there is a consensus amongst the editors that something is not true as far as they have ascertained to the best of their endeavours, then: 
#they should not include it, even if it complies with all other requirements of WP policy 
#:OR 
#if it complies with all other requirements of WP, they can include it, but it should be indicated in the article that it is not thought to be true (but not necesarily thought that it is not true either. ie presented in a reported manner. (It is said by many/some that so&so is a raving...) "
--Light current 04:52, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Basic rules: a discussion

message: * Non significant viewpoints should not be included in an article, even if they respect all other requirements of WP policy. 
Note that it is implicit here that the editors will assert the significance of the viewpoints to the best of their endeavours, and that a consensus will be seeked in case of doubt or dispute. This rule is essentially identical to the rule that uses truth, but it replaces it with "significant". Experts behind the Wikipedia policy explain that the meaning of "significant" is self-evident and need not be precised. See talk page of WP:Neutral point of view for more details. --Lumière 21:55, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here is a rule that is not negotiable 

message: I would like to know why these two words are now heavily emphasised at the top of the page, when before, the the statement regarding verifyability was a lot milder, and was containd further down the page where it fitted better (IMO). 
Can people not see that the present version gives the impression that WP is not interested in truth at all. As I asked before, would all editors playing on this page like to see that first line as the headline in a newspaper. It could happen if it remains here in this form. Dont say you were not told!
--Light current 06:42, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Truth 

message: Just as a matter of interest, try putting 'Not truth' into Google. The result should worry everyone considerably. How long before this gets to the news papers--Light current 07:18, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very worrying development 

message: I suggest most strongly that serious consideration is given to modifying the first sentence to read:
The criterion for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not just truth.
ie emphasising verifyability, but also mentioning truth or accuracy as being necessary. Otherwise we leave ourselves open to the accustation of publishing any old rubbish as long as its been printed in a comic!--Light current 06:54, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modified Wording
Talk:Mary Brooks Picken

message: I removed the "linkless" tag added in November 2006.  I have added: reference to her advisory work on the "Army Green Uniform", links to digitized versions of her pamphlets, and a bit more biographical data (there isn't much out there!).  Also made all the internal references to the Fashion Dictionary link through to this article.  I have a photo from the dust jacket of the 1957 edition of the Fashion Dictionary but it's in pretty bad shape.  I will scan it and see if it can be made usable. - PKM 20:20, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Links

message: This woman claims on her webpage to be a relative: http://www.sjgreenerquilt.com/Bio.htm
She gives Picken's name as Mary Brooks Picken Sumner.  Anyone have details, did she marry late in life? Crypticfirefly 05:40, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another name? 
Talk:Logical reasoning

message: @Phlsph7 In what application were you testing the preview? In my case (Telegram), the SVG is shown. Yes the current wiki source code is hacky, but it works :) PhotographyEdits (talk) 17:58, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I was referring to the regular preview function on the desktop version when hovering over a wikilink or in the search results. I saw you added the template "CSS image crop". It seems this solved the problem. Thanks for figuring it out! Phlsph7 (talk) 18:21, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Phlsph7 Ah I see! You're welcome. I wish there was some real feature to make it hidden except for the preview, but I haven't been able to find it. PhotographyEdits (talk) 18:48, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Circle of Death (drinking game)

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move to Circle of death (drinking game). —Nightstallion (?) 17:53, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

message: It seems that this is Kings (drinking game) with variation rules. Hmwith 19:19, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that this is an encyclopaedia, it would be much more appropriate to simply add a paragraph describing the importance of local rule variations in drinking-game culture. An exhaustive list of individual variations might make good content for a book of drinking games or a social study, but are inappropriate content for a factual encyclopaedia that requires its information to cite reliable, published sources. --McGeddon 11:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, that's great.  Someone should do that.  (I would, but I'm not really sure exactly how to make it unbiased etc.) 129.237.92.180 07:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Max von Essen

message: Wussup with people changing "von Essen" to "Von Essen"? The first one is correct, the second one is wrong. - Nunh-huh
*When the name is categorised it needs to be spelt with a big "V" so its goes into the category in alphabetical order, otherwise the name will appear at the very end of the category, which can’t be correct. The name will appear in the Category with a small "v", so I don't think it should be a big problem. Philip Stevens 09:28, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:San Gorgonio Inn

message: I'm pulling a lot of this from memory as online info is ridiculously (and surprisingly) sketchy.  A comprehensive history of the place is printed on their menus, so if anyone is in the area before I can get there, please grab one and feel free to add to this. - Lucky 6.9 07:46, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:RAAF Base Townsville

message: This article is in no way a stub. I usually don't argue and let people with better judgment do what they think is appropriate (after i removed the potential start article's stub tag) but seriously, this does not look like a stub. Please consider removing the stub tag. Tho in the end of the day if u don't want to its cool, just if u plan on improving it even further, try to keep in mind to eventually remove it.. hehe thanks...calaka 10:29, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Calaka, I have requested a reassessment, assessment needs to be done by people who are independent of the article, it probably will be rated as start class, but the complete lack of references is a bit of an issue for this article. Thanks, WikiTownsvillian 10:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the reply :). I look forward to seeing this article continue to grow. Later mate. calaka 10:46, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:T Tauri

message: Have changed the date for Otto Stuve from 1858 to 1968 as the astronomer had not been born at the earlier date
John D. Croft 08:05, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, I think it must be 1958, since he died in 1963! --IanOsgood 18:06, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are absolutely sure that Otto Struve is the one refered to? I mean: he was the grandson or so of a family of astronomers moving back and forth between Russia and Germany. It could as well be Otto Wilhelm von Struve, his grand-da? Said: Rursus (☻) 15:40, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date 