lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Caledonian Antisyzygy

message: My edit of the Syzygy link to Syzygy (disambiguation) was deliberate, per WP:FURTHERDAB.  This is done so that disambiguators can easily tell that the dab link is deliberate when looking at the article's "What links here" page. Nick Number (talk) 19:14, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I see, didn't know that rule. --Thrissel (talk) 05:43, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Syzygy link 

message: Thomas of Norwich = Sir Thomas Browne.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.66.226.95 (talk) 14:10, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the clarification. I see that the Thomas Urquhart article indicates that the two were contemporaries. I've changed the link to point to that article.  If you would like to do this sort of thing yourself in the future, see the instructions at WP:PIPE. Nick Number (talk) 16:54, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thomas of Norwich link
Talk:Reino Aventura

message: since the two are names for the same park the current name should have then entire story, full history, facts, and trivia. while this page be made into a redirect, possibly with a direct jump to the section about when this was the name for the park --Qazwiz (talk) 05:54, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  MERGE INTO CURRENT NAME - Six Flags Mexico
Talk:Rockaways' Playland

message: So the article is saying that the Park closed in 1982 because of insurance rates rising in 1986? Somebody please explain. 73.174.36.17 (talk) 07:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion of years around closure 

message: The sentence about the Noah's Ark attraction raises more questions than it answers.  Was it a ride, a menagerie (live animals), a walk through display (images or sculptures of animals), etc.?--Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 18:13, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Noah's Ark
Talk:Big Bold Sun Music

message: the content of this page has been deleted, because it wasn't notable.. now i would like to make it a redirect page, but unfortunately i cannot because of the speedy deletion template. --Meesheek 23:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure you can. Someone did. Realkyhick 23:42, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Polka Dots and Moonbeams

message: Don't have time to look up the recording right now, as I'm winding down this archive-browsing session, but I did find mention of PDaM in a concert review from 1963: "Large crowd hears swinging concert at Winona State gym," Winona Daily News, October 2, 1963, page 9. Just couldn't figure out how to work in this item neatly since present version focuses on recordings. (They definitely DID record it, because I have theirs on my iPhone, but unfortunately don't have the album info since this track is from a mix someone gave me.) Lawikitejana (talk) 15:51, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another performer - Four Freshmen
Talk:UMTS frequency bands

message: Seeing that the reserved bands have been removed on the LTE frequency bands article, should the same be done on this page or should we leave it as is? Joshua Shah (talk) 00:15, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we may leave them here, as there are not too many bands specified compared to the LTE standard, but one might use grey text colour for the respective columns. Nightwalker-87 (talk) 22:36, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Noted. Joshua Shah (talk) 22:09, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reserved bands 

message: Are the Center frequency range and UARFCN equation columns necessary because these columns add unnecessary clutter to the page and may violate WP:DIRECTORY. Joshua Shah (talk) 02:53, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree - WP:TOOMUCH may apply as well. Nightwalker-87 (talk) 21:34, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  So should we remove those columns or leave it as is? Joshua Shah (talk) 16:44, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'd agree to have them removed. Nightwalker-87 (talk) 19:33, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok I'll get to it then. Joshua Shah (talk) 23:38, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Should the UARFCN info be kept or should it be removed as well? Joshua Shah (talk) 23:43, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

text: I'd keep the latter, but one may think about optimising column width in order to improve the filling degree of the respective fields. Nightwalker-87 (talk) 13:50, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Center frequency range and UARFCN equation
Talk:Transport in Belgrade

message: Would it be true to say that the old main railway is a slow deadend station, while its replacement is a faster through station; like Stuttgart?    Tabletop (talk) 11:22, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deadend or Through station? 
Talk:Ultra (hill)

message: Some people might notice that 654 + 357 + 209 + 119 + 84 + 54 + 39 ≠ 1524.  This is because the 8 new ultras have apparently been discovered, but have not yet been put on peaklist.org.  — ras52 23:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding up

message: there were two versions of this page, the other was Ultra prominent peak. I have merged the two.--Greatestrowerever (talk) 23:21, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Miloslav Kabeláč

message: Unfortunately there is going to have to be a rewrite.  The main body text presented in this article is taken almost verbatim from a CD booklet of Kabelac's music.
--71.176.128.225 (talk) 20:06, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism
Talk:Franz-Zeno Diemer

message: I have access to BMW Archive material, but I cannot use them due to copyright infringements.  This article needs help with images.QwazywabbitMsg me 23:56, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is not use of  BMW Archive material WP:OR?TSRL (talk) 22:34, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  need images 

message: The BMW Group Archive has a labeled photo identifying the aircraft as a DFW- F 37/III ("C-IV"). I found it by going to http://www.bmw-grouparchives.com/ and searching for Franz Zeno Diemer. I am new to contributing so I need to ask, cannot that label be used as a reliable source, even without using the photo?  
I will mention, too, that I have original copies of most, if not all, of the photos related to this event in my personal collection. Am I assuming correctly that I can grant use of my own copies even while BMW controls the use of its copies? 
BluecreekMontana (talk) 17:16, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  reference needed
Talk:Second Edition (quartet)

message: What was 'ironic' about it? Presumably if it was the second version, then it was quite natural to call the quartet Second Edition, wasn't it? What do we reckon? Fix it? Brequinda 23:57, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The name makes sense only to the audience that knows they were Harrington Brothers. The other audience (that doesn't know) is puzzled.  Hence Irony.  LeadSongDog 00:31, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yvon Gariepy

message: The material, subject, and citations clearly show notability.  A sub-cabinet official, there are sufficient independent sources to verify his notability. Bearian (talk) 00:32, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Order of Karađorđe's Star

message: There will be new awards of this order on 15 February 2012.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.189.216.208 (talk) 23:47, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone have a WP:RS for what degrees the Order was awarded in? And who was awarded what degree? Cheers, Peacemaker67 (talk) 07:34, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not a WP:RS, but this is a possible answer
first class		Grand cross
second class		Grand officer
third class		Commander
fourth class		Officer
see . Peacemaker67 (talk) 12:07, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In WWI a dozen or more of the lower degrees were awarded to Australian officers and soldiers, mostly non-commissioned officers. Peacemaker67 (talk) 12:22, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What degrees were they awarded in? 

message: So far as I am aware, the name "Order of Karađorđe's Star" has been created on Wikipedia, whereas the name almost invariably used in English-language reliable sources is "Order of the Star of Karageorge". See, for instance, the list following. Does anyone see any objection to the page being moved to Order of the Star of Karageorge? Moonraker (talk) 01:12, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed page move

message: I would like to add a list of notable recipients. What do others think? RevelationDirect (talk) 18:22, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Please, provide WP:reliable sources. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:29, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable recipients
Talk:Agnes Taylor

message: This article was hit with a references tag while I was still creating it. That was quick. I have now finished, and there are several references. I will remove the tag. --TrustTruth 01:13, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Those are some impressive references. I'm still a bit concerned about notability, though. From what I can tell, the claim here seems to essentially be that Ms. Taylor is the relative of some important people. Am I missing some other basis for notability? I'm not going to add the notability template at this point, but I'd really like to discuss this a bit. Erechtheus 01:55, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. There's this incident that happened in Nauvoo, Illinois, that makes her notable. I'm trying to get a good reference for it before adding it. Basically, she and some others were put in prison by their husbands for wanting to go west with the Mormons. She got them out and even got money from the men to use going west. I will get it in as soon as I can, I just want it to be well referenced. --TrustTruth 17:50, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:List of As the Bell Rings (American TV series) episodes

message: I highly doubt there is a Season 3. There are no sources cited. The episodes were completely different from the last time I looked at them. Besides, Demi Lovato is in emotional rehab (bless her) and Tony Oller is busy with the TeenNick series Gigantic.
I would remove the entire section personally, but I'm afraid I'd have too many nay-sayers on my case.
Any thoughts?        --The Wing Dude, Musical Extraordinaire (talk) 02:49, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 3, Seriously?
Talk:Sava Centar

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
Coordinates for Sava Centar place it in the middle of small river peninsula at 44°47'60.00"N  20°25'48.00"E.
Real coordinates should be closer to  44°48'32.00"N  20°25'52.00"E.
Thank you.
77.105.60.166 (talk) 14:05, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Beograđanka

message: "For a long time the Beograđanka was Belgrade's highest building."
For how long? Needs more precision to be a useful info.
Also, the entire "Remodeling" section:
"The city of Belgrade plans to remodel the building by cleaning the exterior facade, reconstructing the entry to the building, and even reopening the restaurant on the top floor."
is also not really useful, because there is no date when this is decided to be done, nor when it is going to be done, nor there are sources noted. Isn't it obligatory to post a source of the information too when adding info to an article?
I am sorry I can not contribute to making this article any better, because I don't know anything about it, but at least remove this information or improve it so it can be useful to someone.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.185.127.248 (talk) 22:33, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not useful sentences
Template talk:Victorian elections

message: I've only put in elections for which there are already pages, except for 1985 - thought I might tempt somebody into going back and doing the most recent election without a page!  If anyone wants to put in all the elections at some point, they can be found here - List of Victorian Parliaments.  But I don't think it is worth creating links to fifty pages which will never be made.  George1966 00:18, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've put them all in - even if the articles aren't made, at least it allows people to see when they were. Plus having redlinks may tempt someone! Number 57 09:13, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it's a good idea - it's much more confusing, and I very much doubt that anyone will go back beyond the last three or four elections.  George1966 02:10, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How is it confusing to have the election dates in the template? Number 57 10:15, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm also in favour of having all elections in there, it's what we've been doing in all election templates for good sense. —Nightstallion 12:54, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:British International Motor Show

message: I have done a general cleanup of the article and converted the history sections into a table.
Can someone who knows the history better than me fill in the gaps? I suggest that it would be good to have a row for every show that actually took place, including the ones before WW2.
Also.. I would like to see an introduction and photo for each show as a nice indicator of how styles changed.
-- PeterEastern (talk) 06:37, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup and table 

message: There is some confusion in the way the article as evolved as the last "international" motor show was in 2008 (with 2010 and 2012 cancelled). The shows since 2016 have not been international. I would suggest that the redirect of British Motor Show is ended, and the 2016 onwards content located to that page. <B>Warren</B> (talk) 12:00, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: My suggested reorganisation is to: retain this page for the International show. Consolidate MotorFair and London Motor Show (as is already pretty much done), and move content relating to the new "British Motor Show" to a new page, rather than redirect to this international page. <B>Warren</B> (talk) 14:22, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name confusion
Talk:Palace Albanija

message: I think this claim is not true.
To this day it is the highest reference point between Terazije and Slavija.
Beogradjanka is far higher
--91.148.102.175 (talk) 11:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Highest point

message: I am of the opinion that the correct English name of this building ahould be "Palace Albanija" with a 'j', just like for instance the building Beogradjanka isn't translated as Belgrader in English. We're not talking about the country Albania which has various names in various languages, but a building whose name is simply "Albanija" in every language, not "Albania" in English, "Shqiptare" in Albanian and so on. Names are not necessarily translated the same way ethnonyms are. --Abvgd (talk) 13:16, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: --WhiteWriter speaks 11:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albania or Albanija? 

message: As far as I know, the first skyscraper in Yugoslavia was the Nebotičnik in Ljubljana, built in 1931, that is, almost a decade before Albanija. Viator slovenicus (talk) 01:37, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  First skyscraper in SE Europe?
Talk:Armour–Stiner House

message: Many images of this house are currently categorized as simply :commons:Category:Irvington, New York, when they should be moved to :commons:Category:Armour-Stiner House where they belong. Who wants to move the rest? ---------User:DanTD (talk)  22:00, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons category 
Talk:Yokohama Dreamland

message: I'm taking issue with the second sentence of this article: "When opened on August 1, 1964, it was Japan's first major amusement park [...]". I don't think this is accurate. Nara Dreamland opened in 1961, and it certainly sounds from the description that it was a major amusement park in Japan.
142.255.118.171 (talk) 23:21, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Removed the sentence. oknazevad (talk) 15:02, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overview accuracy
Talk:Tašmajdan Sports and Recreation Center

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.beograd.rs/cms/view.php?id=202468. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB 16:58, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:LeSourdsville Lake Amusement Park

message: The title of this article seems to be misspelled.  Other sources, including the body of the article, spell it Lesourdsville, not Lesourdesville. Bunnyhugger (talk) 04:04, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title spelling 

message: How does a park that is located in Middletown end up owned by Monroe? Since the only mention of Monroe is at the very end of this lengthy article, I may label the information "dubious" because it may be conflating it with nearby Fantasy Farm, which is in Monroe. Sometimes the end is only the beginning... (talk) 20:53, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've updated the page. It appears it had gone stale. I added info about Monroe's ownership. I also added a tidbit about Fantasy Farm and its creation, as not to conflate the two parks. I intend to work on this page, including removing dubious content.--P37307 (talk) 14:53, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Land Owned By the City of Monroe? 

message: I've updated the page some, incl, the current developments, added cites, reworded it. More work will be done.--P37307 (talk) 14:51, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update recent
Talk:Belgrade City Museum

message: The most important item in the collections is the Belgrade Gospel, printed in 1542 and the first book printed in Belgrade.
According to this Politika article dated Jan 2013, the Beogradsko četvorojevanđelje is kept in Blagoveštenje monastery on Kablar. Museum's website does not mention it at all. No such user (talk) 12:27, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Belgrade Gospel
Talk:Argentina elongata

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 09:29, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Potato virus Y

message: I've added the 'this section contains instructions' template to the diagnostic techniques section, as it seems to me just too much info for an encyclopaedia article. If you want to comment, please discuss it here. As someone else seems to have noted above, the article overall is quite technical, and could probably do with some slimming, but first things first! Thomas K (talk) 14:39, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instructions template
Talk:Delph Donkey

message: Sorry, but I am still learning about this site and have no idea how to edit the maps on railway related pages or even, in this case, whether I should. Can someone help/advise/do the editing?
On the map, Moorgate Halt is shown as on the branch to Delph off the main Manchester to Leeds (Huddersfield) line. This simply was not the case. Moorgate Halt was on the main line immediately before the branch diverged at Delph Junction. The single line branch then ran along the side of the main line for a few hundred yards before turning towards Delph.
This mistake is replicated on several maps and comes about because mainline trains never stopped at Moorgate Halt, only branch trains. I know this because I have visited the site, seen photographs on the internet and can back up my contention by reference to old OS maps, as at http://www.npemap.org.uk/tiles/map.html#398,404,1 Moorgate was definately on the mainline.
Can someone put this right, or does the fact that it was only used by branch trains mean that the map is in essense correct?
Thesectionalappendix (talk) 15:53, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error on map.
Talk:Bežanija

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* Write here
95.180.90.86 (talk) 17:41, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 
Talk:Lužane bus bombing

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Mkativerata (talk) 20:36, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 
Talk:Advanced CANDU reactor

message: What is SST? The acronym is not explained and it has no Wikipedia page. Tristan Schmelcher 01:10, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ACR
Talk:James W. Parker

message: Thanks for all your help, and I left you a message on your talk page, asking if this article was any better than I last - I tried to learn from my mistakes last time.  I obviously want to better my writing any way I can prior to posting a major rewrite on a decisive battle.  Thanks, John1951 01:40, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Message on talk page
Talk:KK Crvena zvezda

message: Dejan Tomasevic is from Serbia, not from Montenegro!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.143.217.107 (talk) 20:26, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I came here through Blake Schilb, and I wonder why is the FMP page under the page of Red star?
 
Like the owner said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIcAh1b1On4
:These video clips with by YouTube is proven that this is not the KK Crvena Zvezda for FMP.  Nn94 14 (talk) 12:08, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  the name 