lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gene nomenclature

message: I would be ever so grateful for a small table of examples, so one could just quickly see what format to use when without thinking too hard. Grateful copyeditor. Eperotao 18:55, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Table of examples, please?

message: All uppercase letters are only for human genes and proteins, not animals. italics for genes, non-italics for proteins.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.235.144.166 (talk) 16:40, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Uppercase

message: The convention is now all lower case for both genes and proteins. Gene names are in italics and protein names non-italics. This was selected as the standard in a community survey held at the 2008 International Xenopus Conference. Segerdell (talk) 15:54, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to Xenopus nomenclature

message: Why is this article blatantly ignoring bacteria?  Could someone incorporate Demerec 1956? http://www.genetics.org/cgi/reprint/54/1/61.pdf  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lskatz (talk • contribs) 22:26, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bacterial naming scheme? 

message: There are several formats for the same gene of the same species, it just differs by the database or organization which curates the annotation (RefSeq, Entrez, Pubmed). It would be extremely useful if there was a table of examples of the different formats for the species.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Petersoapes (talk • contribs) 20:19, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of Databases 

message: The article referenced below has information that probably ought to be added.
https://www.theverge.com/2020/8/6/21355674/human-genes-rename-microsoft-excel-misreading-dates
Snezzy (talk) 20:35, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming certain genes to avoid problems with MS Excel 

message: I think that the lead length issues that have been flagged here are largely due to style issues; I plan to edit for concision. It would be great to get suggestions on how some sections may be restructured to remove some of this content into the body of the article, but I believe these edits will at least go some way to improving readability.
Chromaphile (talk) 08:04, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead length issues
Talk:Y. V. S. Chowdary

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.idlebrain.com/celeb/interview/inter_yvschowdary.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Lantrix //Talk//Contrib// 13:34, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I started developing this article complying rules of Wikipedia and without copying content directly from the acquired sources --Yashwanth (talk) 15:29, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development of this article 

message: I developed this article to a considerable extent following all rules and standards of Wikipedia. I think the Issues tag can now be removed. --Yashwanth (talk) 13:15, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of issues tag 

message: Removed "Stub" tag as the article has been developed to a good extent.--Yashwanth (talk) 03:56, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of stub tag 

message: Updated the quality scale from "Stub" to "B" as it seems to be satisfying the criteria of "B" class as specified in the below page Wikipedia:WikiProject_India/Assessment#Quality_scale --Yashwanth (talk) 16:30, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update in quality scale 

message: Hello. In these edits. I have removed which is inconsistent with WP:BLPSELFPUB (). Bulk of the information is basically taken from  this interview to a web portal. So readers would be better off reading the interview itself. Also found the content to be a regurgitation of the claims made by the subject in the interview, which is not the way an encyopedic article is written. The article has very few, if not zero references which are relibale secondary sources. Also see Verifiability does not guarantee inclusion. More clean up is needed, hence flagged the article for issues. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 19:51, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed content to comply with [[WP:BLPSELFPUB]].
Talk:Paul von Hintze

message: "Paul's father owned a tobacco plant, making cigars of the raw tobacco.."
This might be better phrased as "Paul's father owned a small cigar factory.."
The original sentence could be read in a rather absurd sense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1012:B11B:808:DBEA:CA9B:DC9C:3B59 (talk) 04:49, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paul's father owned a tobacco plant, making cigars of the raw tobacco 

message: What happened to von Hintze after the imperial government collapsed and the defeated Germany became a republic?
--Vicedomino (talk) 05:43, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Later life
Talk:Pseudotriangle

message: Good article. Surprised coverage didn't come until now though. --- ÅñôñÿMôús  Dîššíd3nt 20:44, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

message: The section "Pseudotriangles" says:
:The convex hull of any pseudotriangle is a triangle. Each of the three convex vertices is connected by a boundary curve that either lies within the triangle or coincides with one of its edges.
I can't tell what this last sentence is intended to mean. If a "boundary curve" is a path along the boundary of the pseudotriangle, then it should refer to a connecting curve that is entirely on one or more curves connecting vertices, which in the case of a polygon just lies on a sequence of one or more edges. But this would be a vacuous statement. The part about "lies within the triangle" (written so as to contrast with being on an edge) is also vacuous since by definition the pseudotriangle is simply connected.
So I'm removing the sentence. Feel free to reinstate a clarified version. Loraof (talk) 19:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not vacuous. If you choose three random vertices of a convex polygon, the boundary curves between them all lie outside the polygon. If you choose the three convex vertices of a pseudotriangle, the boundary curves between them all lie inside the polygon. Note that a sequence of edges and vertices is an example of a curve; there is nothing in the definition of curves that prevents them from passing through vertices. (The word "smooth" is not used here.) —David Eppstein (talk) 20:21, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing sentence
Talk:Manitoba Highway 6

message: I am going through all pages to do with Manitoba highways and removing unsourced statements especially regarding possible future plans for highway network expansion. Besides, PTH 6 would not be the most logical start point for a road to Nunavut. I will remove unencyclopedic content after a reasonable period to allow for source info to be added. Mersperto 18:59, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:William Andrews Clark Memorial Library

message: As per SandyGeorgia's suggestion, the Clark Library logo has been moved out of the lead.164.67.226.224 08:52, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kampong Sungai Teraban

message: Are the sub-headings under transportation really neccesarry? They seem awfully short to make them worthwhile. TecTec 23:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. --Novelty 05:34, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion 
Talk:Richard Valeriani

message: Last name in title is misspelled:  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-valeriani.  Compson1 (talk) 19:36, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
* Support per nom --Extra  999 (Contact me  +  contribs) 11:25, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Selma came out in 2014.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.38.189.88 (talk) 20:07, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: . — Wyliepedia @ 10:04, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selma
Talk:Richmond Lattimore

message: Richmond Lattimore  Themes in Greek and Latin Epitaphs  1942    A review is here:  https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/501320?journalCode=aja 2600:1700:9580:3B90:8C3C:D669:D42:3AF9 (talk) 21:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography absence
Talk:Rick Elice

message: The article states that, "He was in a relationship with British actor Roger Rees for 33 years, during which Rees voluntarily converted to Elice's Jewish faith." I have a problem with the term "voluntarily converted" and I would like to remove the word "voluntarily" because it sounds clumsy and odd. But, I do not want to do this without hearing the perspective of others. I converted to Judaism as an adult, and I would never phrase it that I voluntarily converted because I believe that conversion implies that it is a voluntary act on the part of the converted. Anyway, I am uncomfortable making this editorial move without input from others. Thank you for any perspective that you can provide. Deaklundlee (talk) 21:48, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Voluntarily converted "
Talk:Indian Brethren

message: I added a reference to the groups beliefs but it is not working right?--Boscobiscotti 19:06, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Petar Stambolić

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]]
Talk:Peter Bessell

message: 'Bessell was under threat of prosecution for fraud allegations relating to several of these companies, although the 1979 Thorpe trial meant that he acquired immunity from prosecution.'
How did Thorpe's trial bestow immunity on Bessell? 86.148.132.69 (talk) 13:06, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Because he was the chief prosecution witness.--95.147.103.57 (talk) 02:22, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  His immunity 

message: Hello,
The Times obituary of Bessell cited as the source of Bessell's school Lynwyd School. I am not aware of any such school and a quick google seems to return only results about Bessell, many of which are evidently lifted from this article. For this reason I am sceptical about the existence of the school.
Does anyone have access to any other sources?
Cheers --KingUther (talk) 20:38, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't find it either, and my father is from Bath and has never heard of it. DuncanHill (talk) 22:04, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I can confirm that the Times obituary does say he went to Lynwyd School in Bath. DuncanHill (talk) 22:10, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: That's interesting, cheers. I still have doubts about the school. It is also mentioned in Rinkagate: The Rise and Fall of Jeremy Thorpe but I suspect that is pulled from the Times. I'll keep looking! --KingUther (talk) 22:31, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have found Lyn-Wyd or Lyn-Wid used to refer to Lyncombe and Widcombe (areas of Bath), and there seems to have been a Lynwyd Hall in Bath, used by a group called the Bath Brotherhood. I raised the question of Bessell's education at the RefDesk, see Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Humanities#Peter_Bessell_-_Lynwyd_School?. DuncanHill (talk) 22:38, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lynwyd School 

message: The references ""Bloch 2014", "Waugh 1980", and "Chester 1979" are not defined. DuncanHill (talk) 21:54, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have fixed them. Looks like someone was just copy-pasting from Jeremy Thorpe without bothering to make sure the references worked. DuncanHill (talk) 11:27, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  References are inadequate
Talk:Rob Grant

message: I'm curious as to why there is reference to Son Of Soup which implies that this is a novel co-written with Doug Naylor, rather than the collection of Red Dwarf scripts that it really is. Equally puzzling is that there's no mention of Primordial Soup - the Red Dwarf script collection to which Son Of Soup is the sequel. I think there needs to be some discussion on how to deal with these two books as consistency appears to be lacking.
Ronstar308 (talk) 03:01, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Primordial Soup'' and ''Son Of Soup''

message: This article does not mention that Rob Grant co-wrote "The Quanderhorn Xperimentations" until the "Bibliography" section. Would it be possible to move this nearer to the beginning of the article? Vorbee (talk) 17:35, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Quanderhorn Xperimentations Needs to be More Conspicuous
Talk:List of investigations of UFOs by governments

message: This has a very misleading name.  I expected to find a list of governments and their actual responses to what they thought UFOs were or weren't.  Instead I found this list of links that really aren't a "list of government responses" but rather a "list of Ufology links".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.66.35.117 (talk) 16:31, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading name 
Talk:Robert Barr (writer)

message: So which is it?
86.29.235.201 (talk) 19:32, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Luke Sharpe or Luke Smart?

message: The bibliography section needs attention. Does anyone have access to a complete listing? Thank you, Newyorkbrad (talk) 14:50, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Robert Cantwell

message: The University of Oregon has given permission to use the information on their "finding aid" in bios on Wikipedia.  Mdazey 15:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Robert M. Coates

message: *1. Abstract Expressionist New York,” at the Museum of Modern Art, a grand decanting from the museum’s holdings that commands nearly all of the fourth floor as well as the print and drawing galleries on the second and third floors. The post-Second World War, made-in-America artistic revolution was a very, very serious affair.Its name, having been coined in Germany in 1919 to describe works by Wassily Kandinsky, was borrowed and put in play in the United States in 1946, by The New Yorker’s art critic, Robert Coates.
*2. The term ‘Abstract Expressionism’ was coined in 1946 by an art critic called Robert Coates, to describe a group of New York artists who were fusing two different styles.
*3. More than sixty years have passed since the critic Robert Coates, writing in the New Yorker in 1946, first used the term “Abstract Expressionism” to describe the richly colored canvases of Hans Hofmann...Modernist (talk) 19:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you totally insane? Read the quotes listed above - #s 1,2,3. taken directly from the references. It's time for you to DROP THE STICK WP:STICK...Modernist (talk) 23:05, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: ref quotes

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates for books and articles, as well as tables for organising short stories, poems and/or book reviews. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 06:34, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 

message: I just discovered that many (if not all) of the dates for the issues in which Coates's stories appear--taken from the New Yorker's own website!--are off by at least a couple of days. It will take a while to fix this, but I will try to get back to this eventually.  Krimp Varkey (talk) 10:20, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates of New Yorker issues for stories
Talk:Hydroxytyrosol

message: Here are some references that were pasted into the article, but apparently were not used to write the article.  However, they may be useful for adding new content. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:49, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional references

message: As an extract, hydroxytyrosol is a dietary supplement with no proven effects in humans. There are no data establishing adverse events and safety from long-term use in humans, no human health benefits of hydroxytyrosol are confirmed and no reason to state in the encyclopedia what rat data suggest might apply to humans, as user Hyperforin wishes to do with this edit. Including such WP:FRINGE information clutters the article with non-secondary, non-human sources per WP:NOTJOURNAL. The section can be more simply stated without using rat data. --Zefr (talk) 05:13, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Rat data is the only means of establishing a NOAEL. Or did you actually think that a LD50 was defined using human trials? --Hyperforin (talk) 05:16, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Irrelevant information for a fringe topic. --Zefr (talk) 05:21, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You are also ignorant and dead wrong about hydroxytyrosol not having proven effects in humans,. But what would you expect from someone who routinely blanks his Talk page to cover up conflicts. --Hyperforin (talk) 05:23, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Adverse events and safety

message: Repeating what I wrote on my talk page:
Per WP:MEDRS, when it comes to medical claims, it is essential that they be backed up by reliable secondary sources (i.e., review articles).  The reason for this is clear.  An alarmingly high percentage of biomedical research simply cannot be repeated and the results of clinical trials often contradict each other.  Review articles weigh the available evidence and only come to a definitive conclusion if the evidence warrants it. Boghog (talk) 20:41, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  ‎Clinical studies 

message: Concerning this edit, the FDA does not take a position on food safety ingredients, such as hydroxytyrosol, nor does it "approve" an ingredient as safe. Manufacturers wanting to include an ingredient submit a safety dossier, which the FDA reviews. If there is no FDA objection, the ingredient is considered safe or GRAS, but it remains the manufacturer's responsibility to assure safety and include public information on safe levels of the ingredient. See this. There have been four manufacturer submissions about hydroxytyrosol safety in food products, shown here, with one application pending for olive pulp extraction. Zefr (talk) 21:39, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  GRAS
Talk:Seret (Drohobych)

message: A little plus for the the meaning of the name "Seret" river. 
I think there's no meaning or in Ukrainian nor Russian. In Hungarian, the word "szeret" means "he who loves", or "it, that loves". Hungarians marched across - and maybe settled for a while - this region in the IX. century AD. Tombs of warriors near Krilos has been proven to be built for hungarian warrioirs. Hungarian experts say, these tombs are too much towards the north, but I think if you look at the map its clearly in the way, if someone comes from the north-esat, and goes towards the west, avoiding the mountanious areas of northern-Carpathians.
The villages name nearby, for example Ivano-Frankivsk are given names, this one's original name was "zabolottya", which means in hungarian "(the place where) he gives it (a horse) oat"
I dont understand, if this origins, and meanings are cleary and widely known, why they are not displayed in the article. I dont see nationalism in this, now the whole thing is undoubtedly Ukrainian territory, and it will be for a long time, but we shouldnt forget the past so esily.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.99.31.14 (talk) 09:51, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Robert Fitzgerald

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 13:34, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: His daughter M. J. Fitzgerald (or one of his daughters, I don't know) is a highly regarded author of at least two novels and one collection of stories, a translator of three Italian novels and biographer of her father (not yet published?) - and was also for nearly 30 years a university teacher of creative writing. (user: ralfdetlef --2001:9E8:566D:2500:615B:D771:6E61:D331 (talk) 16:34, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daughter
Talk:Robert Gibbings

message: The WP:IMAR interest is in his underwater art, see  ClemMcGann (talk) 01:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Underwater Art
Talk:Hakuchi dialect

message: * Сэльам уалейкум хьакIуцубзэ зышьэхэр !  <I>Абрек-Аскер</I>  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Абрек-Аскер (talk • contribs) 10:53, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Джэуап
Talk:Virginia Peninsula

message: The current map in this article is one of the best and prettiest maps I've seen in a Wikipedia article.  Sincere kudos to the creator.  May I humbly suggest that an additional map, taken from farther back, be added to the article to provide some context for the average non-Virginian (such as myself)?  It's just a little hard to see where it is in relation to the entire state. 98.82.84.209 (talk) 17:55, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map matter
Talk:Robert Lewis Taylor

message: This article lists Taylor's birth year as 1912, however, both the Washington Post and NY Times obituaries list him as 88 at his death in 1998. Math would put him at 86. This article did list his age at death as 86, but I changed it to conform to the sources. I do not see his actual date of birth listed anywhere. However, I don't want to change the listed DOB without a proper source. Is there a wikipedia protocol for this? Tchouppy (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date?
Talk:Arsheesh

message: Articles should be merged, relevant info should be incorporated. EmanWilm (talk) 00:42, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. LloydSommerer (talk) 01:42, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: It must be merged. It is too short. No more information about Arsheesh is available according to me.
Srinivas G Phani (talk) 06:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yes