lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Manu propria

message: For a discussion, please see Talk:List_of_Latin_phrases#Manu_propria_merge.
:I have actually been looking for a document containing "m.p." which I might scan and add to this page, but now that it has again (and without any comment this time) been redirected to that tragic "List of Latin phrases" there seems to be no point whatsoever in pursuing this course of action. It seems to me that those redirects are carried out by people who have never learned Latin and who think that that ancient language can be reduced to one unmaneuverable article. <KF> 00:11, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You might try uploading such a picture and restoring the article. Perhaps with the picture it will be considered more encyclopedic. --Iustinus 16:57, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What's wrong with making a Wiktionary article and adding the image there? Surely wiktionary:manu propria could use the work, and then we could link to that from here. And I've even been considering trying to find a way to implement images on List of Latin phrases, by putting small ones in the far side of the "Notes" box; I'd gladly discuss such additions on Talk:List of Latin phrases or Talk:List of Latin phrases (F–O). And an image would certainly increase this article's odds of qualifying for being encyclopedic; most other Latin phrases don't have that much. The page was merged into List of Latin phrases (after an improper merge the first time around that didn't actually put the text or information in the List) because it was a dictionary-def stub with limited potential for growth; if you can expand the stub with examples, historical information and background, cultural significance, etc., then nothing could be better! The great thing about Wikipedia is that article merges, and even article deletions (though this was no deletion, all the info's still in the history), are supremely easy to revert at any point in the future. -Silence 18:01, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

text:  One famous example is declaration of war on Serbia in 1914, starting World War I. Every law in the today's Czech Republic ends with equivalent v.r.. I restored the article with more content. Pavel Vozenilek 22:31, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:805 Hormuthia

message: I think this article. Who ever heard of a "minor planet," I tell you.
*        --User:Michael Simpson
: The name "minor planet" is the official nomenclature, so everybody in this field has heard of it. BTW: A talk page is to be used to discuss the related article. How is your question relevant to this one? Awolf002 18:56, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow 10 Planets? 
Talk:Electronic test equipment

message: Merge discussion can be found at Talk:Automatic test equipment#Proposal for merge to Electronic test equipment. --Abdull (talk) 16:31, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Why isn't there an article/disambig/redirect for test equipment?  There are already articles on Electronic test equipment, Automatic test equipment, and Built-In Test Equipment, so some signposts for navigation would probably help.  70.250.179.129 (talk) 22:43, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Test equipment 

message: Can someone please create a redirect from test equipment? 70.247.162.84 (talk) 21:33, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Test equipment would also refer to other kinds of test equipment, such as automotive test equipment. Inspection gauges would be test equipment. Tensile strength, hardness, and other mechanical properties also come to mind. Equipment for non-destructive testing such as finding fatigue failures in aircraft skins. Glrx (talk) 18:13, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  But right now, if I try to look up "test equipment", I don't get anything useful, and this is a term I hear all the time.  70.247.162.84 (talk) 18:05, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  I created test equipment as a disambiguation page. Glrx (talk) 23:18, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Beautiful!  Thank you. 70.247.162.84 (talk) 15:33, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Test equipment 

message: If anyone would like to pitch in, we are disputing as to whether https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Oscilloscope2.jpg or https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Test_Equipment_Stack.jpg would be a better image to display at the top of the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tpdwkouaa (talk • contribs) 20:37, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  How about :File:Test Equipment Stack 1.jpg instead? Glrx (talk) 19:22, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Better than either of the other two. ~Kvng (talk) 23:02, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I also support this optionTpdwkouaa (talk) 23:46, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I replaced the Tek 475 with the image on the right. If you want to keep the 475, then reinsert it. Glrx (talk) 21:04, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Header Image
Talk:Amherst Regional High School (Nova Scotia)

message: Removed link to notable alumni, "Matthew Gallagher - Fashion Designer/Socialite", as no information on the web exists to support this claim.
I have twice removed the notable alumni "Jonathan Imber, Graduate 2003", and will continue to do so unless a link can be provided to back up the claim of being notable. - ZakuSage 04:27, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have some photos of ARHS (I'm going into Grade 12 this year), I do not know if it is alright to post photos of buildings on websites such as Wikipedia with prior authorization of the building owner, principal, or school board (CCRSB).
Please respond on my Talk page, thank you. Ampersand2006 ( & ) 21:13, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos? 

message: Seriously, people are going to have to stop adding their names to the "Notable Alumni" list.  For one thing, it has several 2008 alumni, who are obviously NOT alumni.  I am an alumni of ARHS, and so if they are on there, then does that mean that I should be on there?  I do not know what these people have done, and so if there's no evidence, then I will remove them from the list.  However I will leave Dylan White on the list because him and his father are well known within the town and area (as far as I know). azure talk × contribs 19:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not believe that Dylan White belongs on the list simply because he is known in the community.  WP:N#General notability guideline does not seem to be satisfied.  I've flagged the entry as in need of supporting evidence.  -- Tcncv (talk) 01:15, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable alumni????
Talk:Hindu eschatology

message: — Assignment last updated by Adirrao (talk) 22:05, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: India in Global Studies
Talk:Ball and Chain (Social Distortion song)

message: I realize there is an ongoing discussion regarding the Single and Song templates (See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Songs#Infoboxes) but this song was not released as a single as far as I can tell through my research. I've looked on the Social Distortion website, Amazon, Billboard, Artist Direct, etc. and the only three "Singles" Social D apparently released were Mainliner/Playpen (1981), Another State of Mind (1983), 1945 (1985), Story of My Life...And Other Stories (1990), and Bad Luck (1992). Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong though. Downstream 17:38, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I realize this comment was from a year ago, but anyways...the band's official website  lists it as a single.  Not 100% sure on the singles' chronology, will work on that next. Tarc 21:57, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Single vs. Song

message: It is my opinion that Social Distortion's song Ball and Chain is Christian in theme. The "ball and chain" in the song refers to the narrator's sins, and he is praying for Jesus to take away his many sins. -- Jruml
:are you kidding? ReverendG 22:33, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian Themes
Talk:Sean Kelly (Canadian musician)

message: *Crash Kelly Online - official site"""
Cheers!
Sean 00:49, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:AUTO. Ardenn 03:39, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Let the article stand up to the AfD decision before you decide to keep undoing my edits. No hard feelings though, I do see your POV :) But, who says there's no more than one Sean Kelly in existence ... ? Sean 06:01, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: The dispute is simple. This article is edited by it's subject and violated WP:AUTO. Ardenn 06:54, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is assumed, not proven, that the article is edited by its subject. The dispute is whether it is coincidence that my user name (and real name) and the name of this article's subject (Sean Kelly) are one and the same. Sean 06:58, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

text: It can be asserted back and forth whether I am the article's subject; it cannot be proven either way. Perhaps a neutral third party could be bold and rewrite the article themselves from a NPOV if the article is deemed biased or unverifiable ... although I truly believe that the article as it stands is factual. Sean 07:03, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dispute

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 23:11, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate
Talk:Altiris

message: This article reads like an advertisement.
: It really does. Mathiastck 19:21, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed advertising POV Mokwella 18:02, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article form

message: This article needs a real clean up. It does look like an advertisement. I will try to put a neutral POV and also state what products and remove the technical features and products specifics. I will try and group the last section into CATAGORIES.
--Visik 12:01, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles need to be revised

message: Oct. 3rd 2008 - It still looks like a pure ad. Ff it cannot be fixe, delete it.
Feb. 24th 2009 - I found the article useful, and not at all like an ad.  It is much more useful to my needs than the Altiris website.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.16.204.211 (talk) 17:17, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  still pure advertising 

message: This piece doesn't give much information. it is short and like an advertisement ..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryanvw (talk • contribs) 16:43, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  not much here 

message: Because I work for Symantec, I'm not going to edit the article myself. But the SMP is at version 7.6 HF5 now, and, more importantly, it should be noted that Deployment Solution has a HF6 and that it then becomes Ghost Solution Suite 3. GSS3 is a direct upgrade path from DS 6.9 SP6.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.6.33.13 (talk) 15:41, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is out of date
Talk:Horatio Seymour

message: " In 1864, he served as permanent chairman at the Democratic National Convention, where the opposition of many delegates to the nomination of General George B. McClellan led many to seek out Seymour as an alternative before the governor made it clear that he would not be a candidate."  But, according to the Wik article on McClellan, he got about 5% of his party's support at the national convention, as opposed to Horatio Seymour's 17% (are they related?) and McClellan's 77%. Kdammers (talk) 07:40, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: See United States presidential election, 1864. The 17% went to Thomas H. Seymour. The political New York, Vermont and Connecticut Seymours seem to have been all related, but I suppose it's not easy to ascertain their exact relationship. Kraxler (talk) 13:25, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  1864 campaign 
Talk:Operation Dark Storm

message: I removed the "mergeto" tags from the top. Not only do I think it is unnecessary but the people who proposed it never even bothered to mention why it should be done in the first place on the discussion page and it detracts from the over quality and presentation of Wikipedia.
:Well, it's a fractional element of a segment of a direct-to-home-release movie. It's fully covered in great detail in the target article, so what makes you think it needs to be separate? -- nae'blis (talk) 21:25, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the merge suggestion, essentially for the reasons mentioned by the above user - it's really not notable or extnsive enough to have its own article. Also, I think that the number of articles on the Matrix series is excessive (the minor characters need to be merged into a single article) - one of the common criticisms of Wikipedia is that pop culture fancruft abounds. --Nick RTalk 22:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To me, the pop-culture coverage is one of Wikipedia's biggest strengths. Ausir 07:59, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but I think, that it don't have to be in another article. I werged it, and created REDIRECT to The Second Renaissance. Hołek ҉ 15:31, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:List of haplogroups of historic people

message: Who exatly ever claimed that this corpse is in fact Gleb Svyatoslavich ?  --85.249.40.129 (talk) 15:39, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agree, the Ruriks would more be of haplogroup N after several tests of noble russian families. We can't take this "VK542" I2 result for granted at all. 80.217.160.207 (talk) 19:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually Russian boyards were mostly R1a. Ps1946 (talk) 03:20, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gleb Svyatoslavich 

message: I think the article could benefit from including some subSaharan historical examples. Ealtram (talk) 03:41, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  SubSaharan examples 

message: It's a bit of a man party  in this list. 75.161.145.178 (talk) 21:53, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Surely the obvious solution is to add more mummies to the list. 86.132.153.8 (talk) 16:51, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  More famous women please? 

message: Does anyone know if because hitler has a E1b1b y haplogroup that it means that his male line is not ethnic germanic? If it is said that 9% of males in germany have the same y haplogroup that Hitler has could all those males in germany be middle eastern as well? In the history of the land of germany, jewish males have lived there for a long time and in that time could have bred many german women and that is where the E1b1b comes from. 172.79.178.254 (talk) 04:53, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hitler's male line is not ethnic germanic?
Talk:Shell Mex House

message: Could it be that this building was the original inspiration for the pyramidal shape George Orwell gave to the Ministries in "1984"? -- mawa 01:00, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "hieratic" does not mean invisible.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 07:32, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:The Woolwich

message: I agree.  Removed until proven. Carbonix 12:04, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An IP keeps adding a link to Wates Group in the "see also" section. The IP claims, through edit summaries, that the Wates family who were involved in the early history of the Woolwich are cousins of Wates Construction family. There is currently no mention of such a connection in this article, sourced or otherwise. The link to Wates Group in the "see also" section has already been removed by several editors but the IP keeps re-inserting it. Even if a citation can be found to support the connection, I doubt whether it is notable in the context of the history of The Woolwich. I should add that the IP has also made personal attacks on my talk page and, in an edit summary, against another editor. Dormskirk (talk) 20:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Wates Group
Talk:PCP

message: The Portugese Communist Party was listed twice, to the same page, so I deleted on of the links/descriptions
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was no consensus, but no primary topic dab. Moved. —Nightstallion (?) 08:38, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted one 

message: from the page: "Miscellaneous:
The Fallen Clan, a member of The Fallen community, Private Cutie Patootie, also known as Kiru, Lone Wolf, C. "Brat" B., and Arctic Wolf, who also claims to be a man."
Am i missing something here or is that vandalism?IchiGhost (talk) 20:19, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Fallen 

message: The article [] uses the abbreviation PCP for it. --Helium4 (talk) 08:40, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  progressive (progressing) cavity pumo 

message: I've removed
: * Prior comparative period, an accounting term that enables financial reports to be compared to a similar year rather than just the immediately preceding year
since no one has found the term to be worthy of even mention, let alone presentation of any information about the concept or practice, in that article.   No doubt a more thorough treatment of accounting practices (GAAP?) could have a section to which such an entry could link.--Jerzy•t 11:35, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prior comparative period
Talk:Headless Chickens (UK band)

message: Headless Chickens was also a NZ band of note.  Achieved some notoriety in Australia.  Album "Body Blow", Singles Gaskrankinstation, Cruise Control, Donde Esta La Pollo, etc.
Should F***house/James Hanley/Saddads etc not have a separate page of its/their/his own? Widmerpool 02:25, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1978 American League Championship Series

message: fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 01:31, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

message: Unfortunatly, as I pointed out during the AFD process, this content is not> about the 1978 AL Championship Series. Where this content probably belongs is in an article about the 1978 AL regular season or the New York Yankees, but certainly not in this article. I'm pasting the content below and will replace with a proper stub. No Guru 04:50, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Replacing this content with stub

message: An anon editor, who has made vandalized other pages, recently made several changes to this article: .  These changes should be reviewed and reverted if necessary. — Myasuda (talk) 15:39, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced changes by anon editor
Talk:Eric Zorn

message: How do we know that Eric can no longer dunk a basketball??  WBcoleman 01:22, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See this where he explains that he cannot in fact dunk a basketball. Whether this is encyclopedic is a different question. Superdosh 05:01, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Thanks to Zagalejo for the great work he did on this article. He turned a fan page with no reliable sources into a quality, fully-sourced encylopedia stub. He told me he plans on expanding it. Great job! --76.189.109.147 (talk) 09:10, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: He explains his positions on several specific issues, which are clearly liberal positions. Your change was unnecessarily wordy -- we should be as concise as possible. --1990'sguy (talk) 02:01, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it to be concise and say that he's a Democrat who holds liberal positions on several issues. This is what he says in the source, directly and indirectly. --1990'sguy (talk) 02:03, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major cleanup 

message: This describes billions of people without saying anything, and doesn't look like something found in an encyclopedia.
You said about Zorn "He explains his positions on several specific issues, which are clearly liberal positions", which is true only about some of his positions.  Democrat, liberal, progressive are not synonymous labels.  The news source doesn't describe the positions as "liberal".   What is worse, you deleted all of those explanations, and replaced them with "Zorn is a Democrat who holds liberal positions on several issues."   At least half the people in the US hold "liberal positions", so readers will look at your sentence and wonder who let Capt. Obvious edit this page.  I've tried to fix it for you.Holbach Girl (talk) 03:18, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: a Democrat who holds liberal positions on several issues
Talk:The Beautiful Country

message: As usual, another orientalist portrayal of an Eastern setting, from a Western point of view. Old cliches that have relatively little sympathies or concerns among people living in Vietnam. Portrayals are endless in Hollywood cinema of mixed children trying to find their fathers is kind of an insult to Vietnamese women and their country. Great cinematography though. It makes Vietnam look rather cheap and dependent. User:Le Anh-Huy.
:The film wasn't really about him insulting his mother by leaving her, nor does it make (IMO) Vietnam look cheap. But I do agree that it is slighly misconstrued and off-center, being that it was written by a non-Vietnamese person. Calicore 06:20, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is Norwish-American, is this a new term? (fifth word in the article)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.61.200.199 (talk) 06:34, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Norwish-American
Talk:Dilong paradoxus

message: http://www.calacademy.org/exhibits/dinos/images/Dilong_paradoxus.png
Should we use this picture of the sculpture since it does a better job of showing of Dilong's head? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nitron Ninja Apple (talk • contribs) 13:06, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I need a picture of Dilong for my user sub-page.  --Sneaky Oviraptor18talk edits tribute 17:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New picture? 

message: Our current taxobox image doesn't really work. It's a photo of a largely complete specimen of Dilong, but this specimen is crushed and you can't really notice any details. If you don't know where to look, you can't even see where the head is. I suggest we switch to a photo of a skeletal mount, just as what is being done in the Caudipteryx article. Now, the current skeleton mount photo we have in the article is bad, but I have uploaded a new photo to Commons, of the same mount, but with better clarity and angle. I want some more opinions on this matter. BleachedRice (talk) 16:26, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me. Note that the old photo of the reconstruction was formerly in the taxobox, but was removed because it was thought to be Raptorex (see above section). FunkMonk (talk) 22:06, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Now we just need to show the actual specimen instead of the old blurry photo of the reconstruction. FunkMonk (talk) 01:15, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxobox Image 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
----
* :Dilong paradoxus → 
* :Dilong → ?
– Extinct animal articles are named for genera, not species. An anonymous username, not my real name 16:23, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: pages with content, such as Dilong are ineligible to be new titles in move requests unless they are also dispositioned. :Dilong → ? has been added to this request to satisfy that requirement. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 18:28, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

text: Problem is it's taken by a dragon, Dilong. FunkMonk (talk) 16:32, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

text: WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA says  Given that the name of the genus by itself is ambiguous, the current name of the page is as expected, and I don't see the need to move it. William Avery (talk) 07:44, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Damn it, you're right, I agree completely. I don't know how I failed to miss that it was already an article. An anonymous username, not my real name 10:33, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 March 2023