lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Barbegal aqueduct and mills

message: Has somebody by chance some of the articles I posted under 'Further reading' at home? Gun Powder Ma 21:35, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further reading 

message: Here's a great photo that would add a lot to the article:
http://www.mmdtkw.org/03-04BarbegalMill.jpg 
Unfortunately i can't find any contact info for the owner on the main page.  Anyone have any idea where this pic is from?  User-created?  From a book?
-Monolith2 (talk) 03:04, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great photo... copyright status? 

message: 4.5 tonnes ? per day?
for 10 thousand or 40 thousand people?
Does not compute. 100-400 kilos flour per day per person? Even if they fed all their livestock on bread? 
No way. Please quote reliable source or maybe refigure?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by EideticGeezer (talk • contribs) 14:19, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Totally implausible numbers in the article 

message: I've located a seemingly reputable sourcehttps://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/9/eaar3620 that disputes several of the claims the article currently has in regards to production figures.
The source claims that, instead of the currently sourced 4.5 tons of flour per day, "The mills had an estimated production capacity of 25 metric tons of flour per day, enough to feed a population of at least 27,000 people..."
Given that the current claim is sourced via a book that I am unable to access and a permanently dead link (in a language I do not speak), I am suggesting replacing the current claim with the citation I located.
Does anyone have access to the book, and if someone does, is it a more reputable source than the one I located? LonelyProgrammer (talk) 09:08, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed Claims
Talk:I Remember You (Yui song)

message: *:I Remember You → :I remember you —(Discuss)— Incorrect capitalisation - the song and single is officially titled and has been released as "I remember you" —Lily1104 (talk) 08:35, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Manteswar

message: There's a new article on Wikipedia called Monteswar.  The settlement it discusses bears a strong resemblance to Manteswar, once I figured out that the district has two names.  Are they the same?  If so, any good information from the Monteswar article should be salvaged and added to this one; then Monteswar can be turned into a redirect. -- Ken_g6 (factors | composites) 04:28, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The best evidence so far that these two places are the same: one MP for Manteswar has an address in Monteswar. -- Ken_g6 (factors | composites) 18:32, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  This page has now become a CD Block page. Therefore, the Monteswar page can stay as a village page. - Chandan Guha (talk) 02:17, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monteswar 

message: name of the BDO of MONTESWAR block 2409:40E1:1074:364F:3C74:C9FF:FEC1:DC55 (talk) 00:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the BDO
Talk:Sport bike/Archive 1

message: This riding position allows for more balance and control in high speed (and low speed) maneuvers.
I would say the aggressive riding position is moderately awful at very low speed; at the least it definitely isn't designed for that purpose. Suggest to remove "(and low speed)".
JRocketeer 01:25, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: "Some manufacturers produce inexpensive "beginner" motorcycles that have all attributes of sport bikes except for smaller engines ( 250-500 cc ). These are normally not considered true sport bikes (Kawasaki Ninja 250R, Zongshen 250 GS)."
While I will not say anything about Zongshen products, I wonder why a Kawasaki Ninja 250R would not be considered a "true sport bike"? Respectfully, SamBlob 23:53, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  250 sport bikes not "true sport bikes"?  To whom?
Talk:Nadanghat

message: Nadanghat last jamindar name Anuj gopal Modak 2402:3A80:1F01:3EA8:0:0:5EE:4F85 (talk) 10:07, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Newcastle Herald

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) 🌺 Cremastra  (talk) 13:51, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The Newcastle Herald →  – For the following reasons:
* The definite article is not included in the masthead.
* In the list of dailies on the parent company's website, this is one of the titles for which the definite article is omitted. Others, such as The Canberra Times, include it.
* Pages on the website omit the definite article in the <title> element and the meta og:site_name.
* It was previously branded as "The Herald", but this was abandoned in 2019 when Nine sold the newspaper but retained the domain name theherald.com.au.
In prose, I think it is still correct to call it the Newcastle Herald, like we do for the National Post or the Los Angeles Times. The page already does this, with "the" not italicised and not capitalised except at the start of a sentence. Tim Starling (talk) 12:00, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 February 2024
Talk:Cannonball (The Breeders song)

message: it was featured on e4's miss match commercial April 2007
Can someone add something relating to the importance gained due to being used in a MTV jingle in the 80's? Please?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.109.74.220 (talk) 21:34, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean like Marginal Era's "This is Heaven" that was the intro to Radio with Pictures long before it was the genesis to MTV? Now that would be ironic. 20:25, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

message: The article says that the video is set in a garage; to my eye it looks like it's supposed to be a small soundstage (it's very large for a garage). I think the idea is that we're watching the video being filmed from the inside-out. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 17:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Video

message: This article quotes almost verbatum the first cited source, which is a very positive review. Tjis does not make for a  balanced entry. ahpook (talk) 18:26, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Over-reliance on single source of information. 

message: Hello, I was wondering what this song was about. I tried to find reliable sources but was unable to find them. I found some speculation that it is about a rift bwtween the Pixies as well as that it is making fun of Marquis de Sade but I am not sure if those are necessarily reliable (it is possible Kim Deal might have been joking). Please find a reliable source for this.70.118.40.18 (talk) 21:39, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a YT video The Explosive Story of The Breeders & Last Splash and the meaning is explained around 23:50  WimbledonGreen (talk) 19:46, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the song is about
Talk:A Girl like Me (film)

message: Why is there a "citation needed" mark placed next to the one of the sentences of the synopsis? The documentary is only a few minutes long. Anyone who looks it up and watches it will have no doubts that the synopsis is accurate. --I (talk) 08:11, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a policy discussion in progress at the Manual of Style which affects this page, suggesting that the capitalization of "like" should be removed. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — LlywelynII 17:18, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Policy discussion in progress
Talk:Niggas vs. Black People

message: I have seen this video and it sounds like Chris Rock is saying niggers not niggas — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.26.94.59 (talk) 20:24, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd bet good money that a white guy wrote this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.98.16.230 (talk) 19:06, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

text: Based on the context of the routine you can be definite he is not referring to "niggas". 212.124.152.159 (talk) 21:23, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming

message: Bill's reply to this is missing.--Inayity (talk) 13:54, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill Cosby Critique missing 

message: Hulk Hogan#Scandal and departure could be listed in the 'see also' section. His use years ago in a phone call that is the subject of present controversy and WWE blacklisting is essentially identical yet he is obviously treated differently than Chris Rock in response. The only question is if a reliable source has pointed out the double standard yet. 174.92.135.167 (talk) 05:32, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Also missing

message: How come no one ever mentions that this was a Redd Foxx bit that Chris Rock took (and, sure, expanded upon) 04:01, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redd Foxx
Template talk:Søren Kierkegaard

message: I noticed that the link ("in" or "from" this template) labeled "Thorn in the flesh" actually points to the [article] title "Thorn_in_the_flesh_(Kierkegaard)".  The reason the link is red, is because that article [title] -- (with the name "Kierkegaard" in parentheses) -- does not exist.  
Then I noticed that there is an article (which does exist) with the title "Thorn in the flesh".  I did not (immediately) rush to edit the template, because the idea of doing so seemed so obvious, that I thought (I "figured") that there might well be a good reason why no one else has done so, "so far". 
Is there an important difference between the article titles "Thorn in the flesh" and "Thorn_in_the_flesh_(Kierkegaard)" ?  If not, then I (or someone) can go ahead and change this template to [instead] just link to [the article about] "Thorn in the flesh".  If there is an important difference, then perhaps eventually the article about "Thorn_in_the_flesh_(Kierkegaard)" will exist.  (It will be created).  
Just an idea, for improvement.  --Mike Schwartz (talk) 23:21, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red link in this template (is it intentional?)
Talk:Tide gauge

message: I question the accuracy of this graph.  Certainly the quality and accuracy of intruments in the 1700s, 1800s and 1900s untill around 1955 or 60 cna not be trusted because of the skill and apptitude of the measurment technitions.69.62.214.182 01:32, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Walther MP

message: The gun was apparently also a semi-automatic pistol, see here and especially here. Rare to be certain, but it should be mentioned in the article somehow. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Edwin Herdman (talk • contribs) 03:48, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it was, because I checked another source and it disagreed with your direct source.--Rollersox (talk) 19:53, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Walther MP from 1935
Talk:Best Foot Forward (film)

message: Fixed cast mixup. June was Minerva. I just saw this movie. This can also be verified at http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title.jsp?stid=68488.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.245.89.148 (talk) 17:10, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Babes in Arms (film)

message: The entire climax of the movie is basically in blackface. I would edit the page directly but I figure my changes would get edited away. But seriously... this non-ironic and mainstream racism wasn't a deal breaker for Oscars or for most of the public. In 2023 are we really going to prop this up as a wholesome entertainment? Smash your idols. Fgdesign2 (talk) 23:15, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No one has anything to say about the blackface?
Talk:Funeral in Berlin (film)

message: Actually, they spot one of the Israelis but Palmer has Broum believe that it was one of Ross's men.137.205.183.82 (talk) 07:28, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Palmer reminds Broum of the Israelis" 

message: The sounds of car horns and tires in a chase scene sounds very much like the sounds in the opening seconds of Jon & Vangelis' "The Friends Of Mr. Cairo". AMCKen (talk) 04:08, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Chase scene sounds
Talk:Tiber Island

message: How on earth did such a large section on an admittedly "fringe" theory by Barbara Thiering make it onto this page. I suspect that there is no evidence for this theory outside of Thiering's idiosyncratic readings of certain ancient Jewish writings. If I find that this is the case I will so note on the page. I am not sure that the theory is really worth the space on the page, but such is the uneven nature of Wikipedia. --Iacobus 01:46, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this whole passage is rather fishy - if the expression is permitted. I think it should be removed. greetings Uwaga budowa 21:27, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barbara Thiering? 

message: I consider the theories of Dr. Thiering highly speculative and removed the section about jewish forerunners of christianity.  As I do not want to destroy the work of others, I dumped the section here. Greetings Uwaga budowa 21:54, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed part of the article 
Talk:Kaserne

message: I'm not too sure about Ayers Kaserne holding such a distinction. At the end of the Cold War, Smith Barracks in Baumholder also housed an entire mechanized brigade (2nd Bde, 8th Inf Div - 2/68 Armor, 1/13 Inf, 1/39 Inf, 208th Spt Bn, and elements of 708th Spt Bn), as well as 8th DIVARTY (2/29 FA, 4/29 FA, C-16 FA (MLRS) - 6/29 FA was on a satellite kaserne in Idar-Oberstein). The 293rd Engineer Battalion was the other large tenant unit on Smith Barracks. If there was another kaserne in Europe with two brigades' worth of combat troops crowded on it, we never heard about it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SEWalk (talk • contribs) 19:09, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Self-declared messiahs

message: On 1/6, an editor added the following: Do not include figures where there is a broad tradition of such belief such as Jesus.  However, Jesus is in this category currently.  Should we remove the language in the category about not including those with a "broad tradition" of belief, or should we remove Jesus from the category? janejellyroll 01:56, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My personal opinion is "broad tradition of belief" is rather subjective and it would be more in keeping with NPOV to just remove the restrictions on the category added on 1/6.  janejellyroll 01:58, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed. I'm doing that now. JoshuaZ 20:51, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of [[Jesus]] 

message: What about Menachem Mendel Schneerson? What about David Koresh? Did these guys self-declare? If they did not, they sure came awfully close.--Filll 19:22, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What about Wallace Fard?Ericl (talk) 22:47, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Others?

message: High-five to the editors of List of messiah claimants. It's a good model for how the various self-claimed deity categories ought to be organized. I'm hoping someone less busy than me will undertake the task of organzing the overlap. --TheEditrix2 15:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlapping categories 

message: "Self-declared messiahs are people who have declared themselves as a figure of divine salvation."  The word "of" is a weasel word enabling an author to avoid defining messiah.  A figure of could refer to a person who claimed he was saved by God.  "Divine" is also a weasel word here.  What does it mean? Anointed by God or God Himself?  Probably what should be said is something like, "A Savior figure who claims to be either God, a god, or a person merely anointed by God." (EnochBethany (talk) 23:23, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Weasel Words
Talk:Self-destructive behavior

message: People with self-destructive behavior aren't aware of healthy coping mechanisms, so they tend to be more violent, usually, this is an emotional response to a bad past life or memory.  
Mdarrow18 (talk) 03:09, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography Notes 

message: I think this page should also include behaviours and actions that do not inflict physical harm but are rather intended to "sabotage" or "ruin" ones life in some way or form: for instance, intentionally ignoring work/study deadlines, self care and hygiene and avoiding help. Page is also lacking in holistic details. Perhaps this page should be merged with the self harm page? Cupio Dissolvi (talk) 05:07, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:Manual of Style#National varieties of English --209.244.43.122 (talk) 21:37, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self Harm & Self Sabotage 

message: "Self abuse" redirects here. For other uses, see Masturbation."
You cannot be serious?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.217.93.216 (talk) 13:35, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: (not by me though) Lova Falk talk 19:36, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Masturbation. What?! 

message: The opening image of the two persons abusing alcohol is far too comical, or satirical, and undermines the seriousness of the subject as a whole. A more serious, and sober, yet G-rated image would be far more appropriate for the article. Oceanic84 (talk) 23:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening image 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jordyn.jones0902 (talk) 20:05, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Adult Development Spring 2022

message: I'm assuming we're saying the 1895 thesis is the Aetiology of Hysteria, which Freud later rejected as true but Ferenczi famously did not. I mean, correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think the two even knew each other at this time. 2600:6C58:200:126D:84D5:CB67:FC7B:90EE (talk) 02:45, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  When does Ferenczi ever say that this is a result of fantasy, not memory?
Talk:Zulu kaMalandela

message: The title is wrong - Zulu kaMalandela, son of Malandela
ka- means Son-of - so this should be either Zulu kaNtombela, son of Ntombela, or the page title should be changed to Zulu kaMalandela. Wizzy…☎ 13:52, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can someone honestly leave us along indigenous people of south Africa write our own history own way the only way we know how and stop making everything into a mythology when this 1st zulu king lived and breath the air as we do now so if you have never been in Africa or south Africa please leave African alone and let them write their history their way because you only interfering like the colonizers did to them 200 years ago. MR JOYFULL (talk) 00:49, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zulu kaMalandela
Talk:Malatia-Sebastia District

message: Bangladesh isn't a district of Yerevan. It isn't even mentioned on Yerevan's page. It's a colloquial term - the district's actual name is Malatia Sebastia - .
Ridiculous.
TheSuave (talk) 18:32, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  District of Yerevan?
Talk:Yakubu II

message: Hi, Masssly, have you read featured article criteria before placing the FAC tp on this talk page? Well, I took my time to clean up the a article a little bit. You make sure the article meets the criteria before nominating always. Thanks. →Enock4seth (talk) 19:22, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured Article Candidate 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 16:52, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:James Temple

message: Pending clarification of the status of the category roundheads (see Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 May 14), I am restoring this to the category Parliamentary supporters in the English Civil War. Rjm at sleepers (talk) 09:28, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category: parliamentary supporters in the English civil war 

message: This article originally contained text under a Creative Commons License by 
:But it's a non-commercial CC license, so we can't use it. Ticket:2009080410066991 refers. Stifle (talk) 13:57, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see this. We are waiting for an OTRS ticket (I have sent David Plant an email with a  reply email address to use to initiate the OTRS ticket process). --PBS (talk) 14:47, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And in anycase, I have removed text that was covered by the CC license. Rjm at sleepers (talk) 17:38, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ticket:2009080410066991 now permits the content previously added from british-civil-wars.co.uk to be included, but not anything that hasn't already been added. Stifle (talk) 18:35, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://www.british-civil-wars.co.uk/biog/temple-james.htm
Talk:Sulayman of Mali

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: page moved.  Andrewa (talk) 19:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Suleyman (mansa) →  – As per the recently-conducted move of Khalifa (mansa) to Khalifa of Mali, WP:NCROY and WP:TITLEDAB indicate that the title Sulayman of Mali is more in line with Wikipedia title naming conventions. However, for consistency with Mansa Musa, for whom WP:COMMONNAME applies, Mansa Sulayman is also an option. In any case, a natural disambiguation would be preferable to a parenthetical one, and I think the spelling "Sulayman" should be favored over "Suleyman", as it appears to be the more common spelling of the name. Scholarly sources, such as UNESCO's General History of Africa, Levtzion and Hopkins' Corpus of Early Arabic Sources for West African History, and Gomez's African Dominion, seem to primarily use the transliteration "Sulaymān". "Mansa Sulayman" turns up 117 results on Google Scholar, whereas "Mansa Suleyman" turns up 69 results, some of which seem to be based on Wikipedia. Ornithopsis (talk) 18:16, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 March 2022
Talk:Esther Kreitman

message: FYI: http://tools.wmflabs.org/reasonator/?lang=en&q=Q15909409# ‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏T‏·‏m‏:‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 08:03, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikidata 