Talk:Pidyon haben

message: Considering this is an article about a Jewish practice, I cannot understand why the verse in Numbers 3 is translated here using the King James Bible.  I don't doubt the accuracy of this translation, but it would seem more appropriate to use and cite a Jewish translation of the Tanacht.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.233.168.219 (talk) 01:28, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of Numbers 3 

message: Please add some information at the top of the page as to the reasons WHY the child is redeemed.
Thank You. —Preceding unsigned comment added by NoahWolfe (talk • contribs) 9 May 2007
:Hi! There is great disagreement as to "why" the ceremony was/is performed. These differences are discussed in part in the sections on "Traditional Interpretation" and "Biblical Criticism Perspectives."  Because the issue is complex and Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy precludes taking an unbalanced position, the matter is defered to where it can be discussed in detail. Best, --Shirahadasha 16:03, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There doesn't seem to be a "Biblical Criticism Perspectives" section anymore.  I'd be interested in it.  If not in this article, is there another article where I might find this info? 67.218.162.142 (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason in Lede 

message: Currently this section is sourced only to "Peake's Commentary". Would it be possible to provide complete citations including an edition, ISBN number, and page numbers? The content currently says things which appear to be contradictory. One paragraph says that "the Jahwist's text argues that the male firstborn were to be sacrificed in commemoration of the event, and thus firstborn human males had to be redeemed from this fate", while another paragraph says that this argument is one being made by contemporary scholars, rather than the text itself. I'm not aware of any Bible text that makes the first argument directly. Would it be possible for someone with access to Peake's to verify this issue and provide more complete citations? Best, --Shirahadasha (talk) 04:45, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biblical criticism perspectives 

message: Reading this article I'm a little confused. Is this a ceremony to excuse someone from priestly duties, or just performed by priests. Some clarification is required. If it's both, then what actually are the duties they'd have to do otherwise. This should all be in the lead paragraph.–OrangeDog (talk • edits) 17:05, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither.  The father redeems the boy from the Kohen.  There is no alternative; if the father doesn't do it, then when the boy grows up he must do it himself.  -- Zsero (talk) 15:32, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion 

message: Is a "first-born son" a son who is also the eldest child? Or is it the eldest son? I think the article should have a definition, somewhere near the top. I read the whole thing and was still confused on this question. It says something about how the ceremony is not performed if the eldest child is female, which would suggest the first interpretation; but it also says that the ceremony is performed because traditionally "the duties of a priest fell upon the eldest son of each family", which suggests the second. Thanks. 172.15.167.69 (talk) 05:26, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: My parents had two children.  First a girl, then me.  I'm told that my father redeemed me using five Silver dollars.JDZeff (talk) 01:15, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Was the Kohen told about the girl? Something's wrong with this picture. Pi314m (talk) 04:35, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is a first-born son? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pidyon haben. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090118061402/http://www.lind.org.il/features/bnotkohanim_v24.htm to http://www.lind.org.il/features/bnotkohanim_v24.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:09, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is a remarkable lack of history of the birth, origin and evolution of this bizarre practice: no approximate dates of its introduction and later 'redemption', no the littlest mention of reasons why it started to be imposed (for animals seems that the goal was to prevent 'perfect' exemplares to can reproduce themselves improving the species, maybe to hinder the evolution, a concept in contrast with the claim of the bible that animals were create as they are without any evolution). By Wikipedia I expect a deeper report about whatever instead to picture it statically and as  came 'out from the blue'. GianMarco Tavazzani (talk) 20:19, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, it does need some attention. I'll take another look at the book I read and see if I can help. It's about the first born and sacrifice. Temerarius (talk) 04:36, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  when the pidyon haben was adopted to overcome the previous general rule?