lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Murder of Fadime Şahindal

message: I just heard a person on TV mentioning she wasn't a muslim, so I came hear and it says she was. What's true?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.69.79.100 (talk) 09:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, she was a Zoroastrian, i e that was her family's religious background. --81.224.126.115 (talk) 23:12, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Religion

message: User: Kevin McE reverted User:Plot Spoiler changes of the name this article to "honor killing." Rather than try to find a WP:consensus through WP:Bold Revert Discuss, User:Plat Spoiler just reverted them back. Plot spoiler also did this at four other articles.  Elsewhere User:Plot Spoiler's excuse has been "no one had edited the articles in a while."  We all can find semi-abandoned articles and make controversial changes to their names. But once someone objects and reverts, we have to discuss. That's what WP:Consensus is all about. I think it is a violation of WP:Consensus for Plot Spoiler not to revert these until consensus to change them is reached. 
This discussion has been going on at Talk:Honor_killing_of_Sadia_Sheikh#Requested_move but since all six articles are different, it is not clear that all would have the same resultant name change. CarolMooreDC 17:19, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No, he didn't. As I've already explained to you at the dispute resolution noticeboard and Talk:Honor killing of Sadia Sheikh, Plot Spoiler changed from one title to another; Kevin McE changed to a third. Fadime Sahindal was changed to Honor killing of Fadime Sahindal. Kevin McE did not revert him; he moved the article to Killing of Fadime Sahindal: an entirely new title. All of this is in the history. It's important not to accuse people of violating policies when they have not. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:05, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case, User:Plot Spoiler still should have reverted to the original name since User:Kevin McE had a problem with his change to "honor killing." This is a good example of why when people start changing titles, it should revert to the original while discussions are going on. Especially when they do five or six at a time. The onus remains on User:Plot Spoiler to do the right thing. CarolMooreDC 04:28, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  For whatever it is worth, I support the title including "Honor killing" because this spells out precisely why the event is notable and is the more descriptively specific of the two alternatives with the word "killing". Blue Danube (talk) 07:09, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert of article name vs. consensus policy

message: The article beginning says kurdish, the short description says turkish. Which is it? OmniusM (talk) 09:45, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: What's going on? There is a request at WP:RFPP to semi-protect the article but the IP has a point which needs to be explained. Johnuniq (talk) 08:34, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Mb, was too focused on the IP's disruptive pattern. I've changed it to Kurdish. --HistoryofIran (talk) 11:29, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kurdish/Turkish
Talk:Ocean Machine: Biomech

message: The "Professional Review" seems to have problems. There doesn't seem to be any kind of actual review aside from the 3 stars given, which appear to be the default for any album without a review. Perhaps it should be removed?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.175.140.33 (talk) 21:15, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:IQ classification

message: The idea that Feynman actually scored a 125 on an IQ test of some kind is ridiculous on the face of it. Yes, I know that the man himself liked to tell the story, but I can only assume that he was having his usual iconoclastic fun in doing so. The man who taught himself calculus by age 15 was in the high gifted range, to be sure, and those who accept the story on face value are flunking one of life's little IQ tests themselves. The fact that his biographer accepted it says more about the leftist antipathy to intelligence testing than it does about Feynman. Of course, I can't prove that he didn't actually get such a score on a test, but if he did, it would have been as a prankk - the kid knew what he could do. 
MarkinBoston (talk) 20:34, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard Feynman and IQ 

message: In popular media, you see lots of articles talking about how so and so has an IQ of 200-250 or something ridiculous. Since this is not feasible with most reliable tests, should there be a section discussing this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.27.204.252 (talk) 14:41, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on pop culture High IQs 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :I.Q. test results and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 6#I.Q. test results until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  An anonymous username, not my real name 02:24, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "I.Q. test results" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: its missing the lower half of the average range. Looking at the source, “normal or average” should be 90-110. Not 110
Terman's Stanford–Binet original (1916) classification
IQ Range ("ratio IQ")
IQ Classification
Above 140
"Near" genius or genius
120–140
Very superior intelligence
110–120
Superior intelligence
110
Normal, or average, intelligence
80–90
Dullness, rarely classifiable as feeble-mindedness
70–80
Border-line deficiency, sometimes classifiable as dullness, often as feeble-mindedness
Below 70
Definite feeble-mindedness 68.55.76.245 (talk) 01:24, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: done, Thanks. Moons of Io (talk) 01:27, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is wrong
Talk:Asas de Portugal

message: regarded as the finest acrobatic team in southern Europe? with two members? Where does this leave the "Frecce Tricolori" team from italy? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.18.201.174 (talk • contribs) 16:08, October 21, 2007
:Ah. I suspect the article needs a little work! I'll have a look at it over the next couple of days. Kind regards. --Malcolmxl5 15:21, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Mad Shadows (album)

message: I created this page because Mott the Hoople were a seminal influence on much of 1970s rock music and Mad Shadows is a key album in their development.
If the page stays I will be adding to it over the near future, and relating it to the other Mott the Hoople articles on this site.Mgsnr 17:03, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Soda Pop * Rip Off

message: On October 12, 2008 a Notability tag was placed on the main article that said:
This article may not meet a proposed guideline for notability (see Wikipedia:Notability (music)#Albums, singles and songs). If you are familiar with the subject matter, please expand or rewrite the article to establish its notability. The best way to address this concern is to reference published, third-party sources about the subject. If notability cannot be established, the article is more likely to be considered for redirection, Wikipedia:Merge, or deletion, per Wikipedia:Guide to deletion.
On October 24, 2008 IP 137.140.128.84 removed the tag with the rationale "This album is obviously notable: it's on a notable record label, and was produced by a notable musician/producer. It meets the requirements." There was no change to the article aside from the deletion of the tag. The tag was placed on the page in order to assist Editors in expanding this article. It's removal, with no changes being made, does not help the article meet guidelines for notability, thusly may be subject to deletion.
Using the guidelines found at Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Notability (music) this article does not currently meet the guidelines. The article does not establish that it's subject has  received "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."
There are currently no Wikipedia Policies or Guidelines that state that any release on a "notable record label", or a release by a well known artist, to be provided automatic "Notability" status and exclude an article about the release from having to follow guidelines. 
Editors who are familiar with certain topics may make false assumptions that, because they are aware of it, others must be aware of the article subjects notability as well. As English Wikipedia is freely available to readers around the world one should never make that assumption and always attempt to provide verifiable references and sources that are independent of the subject. Soundvisions1 (talk) 16:31, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 137.140.128.84's rationale was wrong as subjects do not inherit notability from related/parent topics and must it be shown through independent coverage. However, after a brief Google search and reading the AMG review, I believe there is some evidence of notability, though expansion is still necessary. Bill (talk|contribs) 22:07, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notablity
Talk:That Was Then, This Is Now, Vol. 1

message: One of the songs that got cut from this album was "Black And Brown" featuring Snoop Doggy Dogg. It was used as a teaser for the album, according to this post from DubCNN. If you want proof, I sent a MySpace message to Frost personally last week for confirmation. ElMeroEse (talk) 04:28, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional Note
Talk:The Alchemy Index Vols. III & IV

message: I just added acoustic rock as a genre due to the fact that a lot of songs are supposed to only have acoustic instruments on them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt 14 (talk • contribs) 20:08, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acoustic rock 

message: My copy of this album is from the UK. As mine has the correct Roman numerals for the earth disc, has this error only occured in the USA? Also, where the other three discs have the writing in black, my air disc has white writing. Is this also an error, and if so is it common? U-Mos (talk) 18:34, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My copy from Canada doesn't have the errors either... and my Air disc has white writing as well. Thricecube (talk) 20:55, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disc art errors
Talk:The McCartney Years

message: I've been getting the DVDs one at a time from NetFilx, and my only grievance is that many videos I like couldn't fit.  These yield for another volume.  I've got a whole list:
Bip Bop/Hey Diddle
Band on the Run (as seen on The Tube [not YouTube])
Jet
Getting Closer
Old Siam, Sir
Arrow Through Me
Waterfalls (uncut at end)
No More Lonely Nights (dance version)
Stranglehold
Only Love Remains
Press (Abbey Road version)
Distractions
We Got Married
Put It There (version two)
Ou Est le Soleil?
Figure of Eight (version two)
This One (Dean Chamberlain version)-My biggest complaint of the DVD.  I like this one better!
Get Back (live)
Biker Like an Icon (version two)
Young Boy
The World Tonight
Lonely Road
From a Lover to a Friend
Freedom
Your Loving Flame
Jenny Wren
Dance Tonight
Ever Present Past
Only Mama Knows
I suggested this to Paul on MySpace and I'll go to Rhino/Warner next (though he owns the rights).  He'll need something new to promote by the time he does tour again (you all know why we're still waiting!).  The new album won't be by then.
:Also, I'd like to see a complete solo singles compilation and box set, featuring out-of-print and unreleased material, as he said while he doesn't mind bootlegs too much, he'd like to release them properly himself (the interview's on YouTube).
::There are also some specials that only made it to VHS and TV, so I had to make my own DVD-Rs, but it's not quite the same.
:::This will be a big year for him (this facet anyway).Sposato (talk) 02:33, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volume 2
Talk:The Ukrainians (album)

message: I've literally translated the Ukrainian song titles in the article. (These songs have alternative English titles in the album.) By the way, Ukrainian word "slava" means "glory" and has nothing to do with Serbian traditions.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.120.40.180 (talk) 14:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song Titles
Talk:Life & Personal Development Coaching

message: I believe "Life and Personal Development Coaching" is the same as "Life Coaching", the former being UK denomination and the latter being American. --Dwarf Kirlston 15:25, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're correct. This should be deleted or merged. Doesn't look like there is even much here to merge though. Rray 01:02, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree with you, although I think there is a distinction between this kind of coaching and sports coaching, for example. But I think lumping executive, business, and life coaching all into one article makes excellent sense. Rray 18:32, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This one at least should be merged with life coaching and yes it is called that even in the UK, not 'life and PD coaching'.  The dating one could go in there too.  I don't know whether you'd succeed in merging 'executive' etc coaching in, but I'd suppoort that.  Sports coaching is a different, older thing I think.Merkinsmum 13:16, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Agreed! Merging is justified. Said: Rursus ☻ 15:44, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They should be merged--Hu12 (talk) 01:27, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Aehumm! "Coaching" originally referred to sports and physical activity, but it seems the term is slowly acquiring a generalized meaning out there. It seems that there are general methods used for all kinds of coaching applications, that originally emerged from the sports coaching, especially visualization techniques combined with relaxation. I think all should be in one article, or referred from one main article. Said: Rursus ☻ 22:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal
Talk:Meteorological Effects of Hurricane Felix (2007)

message: For more details on this topic, see Meteorological effects of hurricane Felix (2007)
this is a dummy text where a short summary of the meteorological effects would be.
This article then, starts out with:
:main article: Hurricane Felix (2007)
This is a dummy text that represents the first line of your article.
Make sure to keep your spunout article completely on topic of the meteorological effects: There is already an article about the hurricane itself, and it is not a good idea to repeat that information. 
Note that I changed the capitalisation to conform to the guidelines for article titles, I'll move this page to the correct capitalisation in a moment. Martijn Hoekstra 15:56, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meteorological effects 

message: I redirected it to the main article. There's nothing new here and there are no sources. --Coredesat 02:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't merge it. There is nothing here that is not in the main article and there are no sources - those are the reasons. --Coredesat 04:51, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected
Talk:Toy Ride

message: Why does the song "Russian Lullaby" link to the disambiguation page for "Made in Sweden"?  I want to confirm whether it actually is an error before removing the link. --Kitsunegami (talk) 10:48, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Volcano (Jimmy Buffett album)

message: The regular bass player is not credited. Judging by ear, the bass player on "Survive" is very different - given to soaring, contrapuntal melodies far outside the normal run of bass playing. The opening guitar solo on "Chansons" also sounds like it may be a bass guitar, possibly played by the "Survive" bassist.
It may be significant that the main studio was owned by George Martin.MartinRinehart (talk) 16:06, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't seem to find any source that says a musician went uncredited.  Geeky Randy (talk) 16:39, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing bass players
Talk:Watershed (k.d. lang album)

message: I'd like to suggest a move to Watershed (k.d. lang album), rather than having that redirect here, on the grounds that lang universally uses the lower-case form of her name and that most of the rest of our references to her on Wikipedia use this form. I don't know, however, if I'm suggesting this in the right place.
Thanks, dcd139 (talk) 04:11, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, WP uses a style guide for all English names, and her name should appear as per that, not some affectation she &/or her record company are using to brand/market her at (regardless of trademarking too — these are only used to secure rights in the business world, and should have no baring on an encyclopaedia entry using correct English name capitalisation). Jimthing (talk) 04:08, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move?
Talk:Franklin D. Miller

message: For purposes of this wikipedia article, would Miller's unit affiliation be given as 5th Special Forces Group or MACV-SOG? I've added material to the main body of the article, including reference citations and a note on MACV-SOG, but would appreciate some feedback as to how best to represent Miller's assignment to this highly-secretive task force. Azx2 19:42, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  unit affiliation? 

message: IP editor added this personal addition.  Preserving in the talk page as it's not written in third person and I can't attribute it.  --DHeyward (talk) 06:01, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP's personal account
Talk:You Fat Bastard

message: "You Fat Bastard" was a common chant from fans in the audiences of heavy rock/heavy metal bands in the 1990s onwards, usually when one of the road crew walks on to the stage to prepare some equipment before the band actually come on. It was a jovial practice that relieved the boredom of waiting.
This is also referenced in the the Faith No More live album 'You Fat Bastards: Live at the Brixton Academy'.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.137.40.199 (talk) 22:33, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Talk:In the Rain (Lim Yee Chung album)

message: Should this article be here? Looks like a Chinese album--MilesTerrex (talk) 00:58, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why here?
Talk:The Sports Reporters

message: Does the Whitlock Controversy actually belong on this page? I know he was on the show with Lupica, but no mention of the Sports Reporters is made in that section.
:It could be in the ESPN page, but it's justifiable here, for the reason you mention. It's worthwhile to note, for someone who might be curious (as I was), why a panelist who used to be there isn't there any more and might not think to look on the ESPN page. However, it could be a single sentence pointing to a more fleshed-out discussion on the ESPN page, for example. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 16:14, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

message: There is a small college in Virginia called ODU(Old Dominion University). The year 2009 was the first year there has been footbal at this college in 70 years. The program was cancelled 70 years ago for reasons no one really knows. The point is, even though their schedule was relatively weak, they went 10-2 for the year. They are an impressive young team that gets no recognition from anyone at ESPN sports. Atleast they could be mentioned.71.176.37.126 (talk) 14:55, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Virginia College ODU
Talk:Ohbijou

message: Per Wikipedia's policy on external links, the "External links" section of an article is meant for only the one or two most important and band-specific websites. Interviews with and articles about the band in media may be cited as references, where appropriate, but are not suitable for direct listing as ELs. Accordingly, the following links have been removed from the ELs; they may be cited as content references only.
*Exclaim! Magazine cover story
*Ohbijou: CBC Radio 3 Artist of the Month - August 2009
- Bearcat (talk) 21:55, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:Boulder Outdoor Survival School

message: I would like to find the students I went through, or met on this class. 
                         Delwin Lane
P.S.
I was the one who had the seizure the first day in and developed the warmth retention form, with students sitting on the road bank and people laying in there laps to combine there heat. 2605:59C8:F0:8610:E0E6:BB21:8132:5FE1 (talk) 20:15, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reunions
Talk:Quinte West

message: in quinte west ,ontario. what is the french speaking population? and why are there no signs in french if the french speaking population is 5% or more?{copyrighter}.
:there is a small french speaking population here at the air base, because the majority of air force personal only stationed in the area are French Canadians. Also, alot of the younger generation here speak french because of french immersion. there is also a small minority of Franco-Ontarians around here. and to answer your question about signs in French, it's not as if we're a French speaking community, here French is only spoken by Quebeckers living in Quinte or by French Immersion students, its more of an immigrant language. -Mike Oosting (talk) 00:38, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reworded the sentence for improved accuracy about what "separated municipality" actually means — it's an administrative separation, but does not mean that Quinte West is geographically or statistically not part of Hastings. However, strictly speaking the fact that Trenton was a separated municipality does not in and of itself prove that Quinte West isn't; in point of fact, the UWO source does explicitly say that Quinte West does still hold "separated municipality" status (p. 5: "Today, eighteen cities and towns in Ontario remain separated: Barrie, Windsor, Guelph, London, Kingston, Peterborough, Orillia, Pembroke, Brockville, Prescott, Gananoque, Cornwall, Smiths Falls, St. Thomas, Belleville, Quinte West, Stratford and St. Mary’s.") Bearcat (talk) 18:26, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Talk:KGRE (AM)

message: I don't see how how the station could become "profitable by the end of 1997" when Salazar bought it the following year (1998) and then made the changes that turned the station's fortunes around.
Could we be talking possible typos?
Just curious. 2600:8800:784:8F00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 00:30, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "El Tigre" section
Talk:Melvin Goes to Dinner

message: Information to add to this article:  box office and reception. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 02:48, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to this article

message: Unless the movie itself is strange and disjointed (which, if so, I humbly apologize and withdraw), I would recommend someone re-write the plot section of this article.  As someone who has not seen the movie, it comes across like it was created from a much longer, thorough plot summary with huge sections deleted to make it shorter with little regard to how much the final product made sense.  A few notable issues:
What does the parenthetical “after a fashion” mean in the first line? In the next line why are “mothering” and “performing well” treated as mutually exclusive things in an either/or sense? And what’s with the frenetic use of semicolons separating phrases, describing the main character accidentally contacting an old friend ; semicolon; who brings a lady friend and they arrive early but then; semicolon; “at the appointed time, four people are present”—-??
I could keep going, but suffice to say unless this is a film of the same ilk as Mulholland Drive, I would suggest a section rewrite.  I would try my own hand at it, but I’ve never seen the movie. Laced8 (talk) 05:41, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What’s with the plot summary?