Talk:Mitsubishi GTO

message: They actually aren't exactly the same car.  Same base model but with enough changes to warrant it's own article, in my opinion.
* The 3000GT and the GTO are the exact same car. What changes are you talking about? --ApolloBoy 01:41, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actually not. 

message: Non-Auto person here.  If there is this much to put into one article, why should it all be on one page?  It would just make one huge article that should be split anyways.--Attitude2000 18:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big enough to have it's own page 

message: Might I ask what the purpose of this section is for? And I do agree with Attitude2000. Big pages are extremely discouraging and oftentimes harder to keep up with. Colonel Marksman 22:35, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recall

message: I'm starting with the cleanup work. Feel free to do other edits, but maybe we can wait for splits, merges, and trimming until we've got a clean article to work with. -- Mikeblas 23:37, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's it; I think I've done everything I can for the cleanup. I'll take another pass through and try to offer conversions for more uints, but I've done the best I can to improve the existing text. The article is a little shorter, but there's still some redundancy, particularly in the descriptios of the different models (and the different options over time), the description of the special features (which also explain which models had which options over time), and the generation discussion (which explains which features were on which model years). That's a little more than I'm ready to address. --Mikeblas 14:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, and: the giant quote could probably just be deleted, since it's got little context and few ties to the rest of the article. And the whole thing needs references. -- Mikeblas 14:50, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted the huge quote because I didn't feel like there was anything I could salvage from it. -- Mikeblas 16:06, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I've removed the cleanp tag. I hope ya'll agree that the article is a much better read now, even though it is a bit redundant. -- Mikeblas 01:47, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup 

message: Was the car available in Canada, or not? Under "History", the first paragraph says that "Canadian 3000GTS were distributed". The second paragraph says "the 3000GT was never sold in Canada". Under "Models", the article says that Canadian models included the base, SL, and VR4. -- Mikeblas 15:59, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canada? 

message: I've just finished a major rewrite of the Mitsubishi GTO article, which basically involved splicing together everything on that page and this one and doing some pruning. I reckon it'd be OK to now redirect this page to that one (something that's been done in the past before this page was recreated). Any thoughts or will I be bold...? --DeLarge 14:45, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks pretty good to me. I'm glad you folded the long reundant text in this article (about features being added and removed over time). I stopped short of the merge because people here were still arguing about the cars being of the same lineage. -- Mikeblas 15:53, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, no other feedback, so I'm going to be bold: making this a redirect. --DeLarge 23:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ready to remerge? 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Mitsubishi GTO which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 04:15, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress