Talk:Prince Albert, Saskatchewan

message: The city of Prince Albert has a much more beautiful skyline that what is depicted in the photo. Please can someone photograph the city and replance the one we have now. As of now we look like a small prarie town, not a city.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by KermitCrack (talk • contribs) 00:36, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: City Picture

message: Time for some discussion about Prince Albert.
Considering the history of the last 100 years, what is in store for this City and inhabitants over the next 100?
There is some questionable stuff on this page (particularly the mentions of small non-notable bands from PA who only played one gig "to a small audience"), but some of the silly-sounding stuff has a folksy quality to it that adds colour to the page (I particularly like the bit about the local high school that performs gothic romances and light-hearted kids shows).
We have to remember that if we are to delete much of the information that we have deemed "questionable" then P.A. starts to look like the typical dull prairie city. Until we are able to add more cultural statements on the city, these will have to do. As long as it is to do with Prince Albert, in my mind it has legitimacy.
edit: what PA looks like as a result of the editing process is not important so long as a factual representation is put forth. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a promotional tool.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.208.29.5 (talk) 06:41, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Next 100 years

message: In order to be unbiassed and tell the whole story, it may be worth noting somewhere on the page that many Saskatchewan residents, including people from Prince Albert, consider it an undesireable place to live.  Racial tensions, segregration, high crime rates, etc. could be discussed along with the demise of local businesses since the introduction of big box retailers in the town.  The obesity epidemic may also be worth noting.
:As a resident of Prince Albert, I do not see it as an undesirable place to live.  The problems mentioned earlier are evident in many cities across Canada, and shouldn't be relegated specifically to Prince Albert, Saskatchewan.  Yes, local business are suffering due to big box retailers, but the same thing is happening everywhere.
If anything, it should be specially noted that the Indigenous Peoples residing in and around Prince Albert are making headway in regards to self-government and their justice systems.  Racism is not as evident in this city as in others, as many native and non-native people have learned to live with each other in harmony.  Prince Albert is the only place where I've seen native people employed in a variety of jobs and working with the public.  It is something you don't find anywhere else, and should be applauded.
:Well, Prince Albert does have a big base of Native people and so we try to put in jobs off all sorts. Mr. C.C. 17:04, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, I just entered that exact string (both with and without quotes), and the first link is to the Wikipedia page. --Paul EJ King 00:47, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems with the city

message: St. Paul's was the first church in the Prince Albert settlement about 100 years or so ago.  They just celebrated it's birthday a week or two ago.  Mr. C.C. 17:11, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: St. Paul's Presbyterian Church

message: Is it really necessary to have a picture of the man, Prince Albert, at the head of the page?  Most residents have no idea who he was or what he did.  I would suggest a picture here of the the city's skyline and have the picture of Prince "What's his name?/Who cares" down below.  Good Ninja
:Prince Albert is named after the prince after all.  It wouldn't hurt to put a picture of him on the page.  Mr. C.C. 17:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. It does make the article more interesting. The point of an encyclopedia, after all, is not to reflect to people what is already familiar to them, but to show them soemething they can't get elsewhere. I think it raises the profile of the whole article. In fact, my first reaction was: Great! Where did they get that picture? Apart from that, the PA skyline does not make it stand out from other small-city skylines, so I'm glad you chose not to highlight it. --Paul EJ King 00:55, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added a note to tie in the picture of the person to the article itself.  That he is the namesake.SriMesh | talk 21:12, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Prince Albert's (the person) Picture

message: I though the population is just over 40,000.  We are larger than 34,000 from the last census.  Mr. C.C. (talk) 07:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population 

message: :Image:Flag of Prince Albert.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Flag of Prince Albert.gif

message: *Demographics could use template for statistics such as at North Battleford, Saskatchewan, else could be put into prose format.
*Interesting Facts section could be put into prose format and not bulleted list format, and added to history or elsewhere in article.
*More sports are happening (I thinks) in Prince Albert than just hockey.
*Festivals could be written in prose and not list format, with less red links and more citations.
*Famous Prince Albertans could be their own list, with citations again, and those notable Prince Albertans added to this article in prose format as to their contribution to the Prince Albert community.  A tabular format for lists of people works well such as List of Athabasca University people
*The external links section repeats wikilink references, which are not necessary to have in both areas.  Web sites are better listed as references within the article rather than in an external link section. 
Some external links are questionable as to the information gleaned about the city of Prince Albert such as...Cooke Municipal Golf Course..does this website talk about the city or is this a tourism destination in Prince Albert.  The golf if notable in Prince Albert could be added to the sports section, with an inline reference to Cooke Municipal Golf Course instead.
*The Arts and Entertainment section is very very full and lengthy, it should be its own article, with edited important highlights within this article, and reference to ...Main article here....  The arts and entertainment scene it is much larger than Prince Albert's other sections, which are also important and notable to Prince Albert in their own right as well, but are being foreshadowed by the Arts and Entertainment section.
*Can the editor who added the Arts and Entertainment section add citations? There are not too many online in this regards.
*Also, is...Carlton Comprehensive High School (largest high school in Saskatchewan)..the largest in student population or the largest in square feet (sauare meters)?
IMHO...70.64.182.182 (talk) 22:41, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added to the music and entertainment section, along with other sections, but we there needs to be some references in the rave/electronic, alternative rock, and punk rock sections.  Mr. C.C. (talk) 05:50, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  For the references, is it possible if you are that close to the scene, to list something other than a web site...
Citation choices possible an article in a newspaper or use the conference report or paper template for a paper or report given by the school, project, drama theatre etc.  If the citation of how to access the paper is given, it is a valid reference, that someone can go to a school/public library and verify, even if it is changing, they can find the historical paper/book etc Kind RegardsSriMesh | talk 02:22, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Revisions

message: I found some history of Prince Albert on the P.A. Tourism website.  Someone should take a look at it and see what could be added to the history section already in place.  It would provide to be useful for citations.  Mr. C.C. (talk) 07:35, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History Of Prince Albert 

message: These are WP cities guidelines and WP settlements how to for a guide where applicable.SriMesh | talk 22:17, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions and renovations

message: Who is Chris Kent- BK? what is a BK and what has he to do with PA?SriMesh | talk 04:08, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That is what I am wondering.  Stick a citation needed tag beside that listing on the entry.  Or just remove it all together.  Mr. C.C. (talk) 16:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Chris Kent]]- BK

message: Notable people had included Matt Wyllie - singer/songwriter without citation or reference.  Can only find his facebook page.  Should probably have a different source for notability.SriMesh | talk 03:49, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If he plays at Turks Coffee Shop, than he is not notable at all.  Mr. C.C. (talk) 17:26, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Matt Wyllie]] - singer/songwriter

message: The notable citizens heading seems a bit cluttered with the way it is has been expanded.  You are adding extra. stuff that doesn't need to be there.  I mean you totally left Blair Morgan out of the athletes section.  If you check the Saskatoon notable section, you will see that you can have all the information while still keeping the list bulleted.  Mr. C.C. (talk) 00:03, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Citizens 

message: Just to let you know I've nominated :File:Carlton Trail Railway - EMD GP30 Train 2508.jpg for deletion at FFD, you can find the discussion here if you wish to comment. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 17:21, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Carlton Trail Railway - EMD GP30 Train 2508.jpg]] 

message: There are too many nicknames entered in the infobox. "P. A." the initials of the city is often used but the others are not in use.-- Kayoty (talk) 20:52, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Nicknames

message: This section offers no real information and is of interest to only a few people. -- Kayoty (talk) 08:07, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Local Vernacular ? 

message: Moved list of Prince Albertans to new page List of people from Prince Albert.-- Kayoty (talk) 08:09, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prince Albertans 

message: Removed some material relating to climate, attractions and education that are not notable and that are not referenced. Some sections on attractions and education need references and clarification. The section on government needs to be expanded. The section on railroads appears to be too long but could eventually be moved to a new page such as "History of Prince Albert, Saskatchewan".-- Kayoty (talk) 02:48, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further editing needed 

message: For updatining, please, read this: . --Kerchemer (talk) 10:45, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "needs update" - diamond exploration 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:51, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion