Talk:The Roxx Regime Demos

message: :Image:Roxx regime.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:35, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Roxx regime.jpg

message: Wikipedia's guideline for album notability:
In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia. 
This is an official Stryper album, consisting of songs from Stryper's pre-Stryper days, when they called themselves The Roxx Regime. This is not a demo. The album was released on 7 July 2007 by Stryper. Notability is thusly established. Amsaim (talk) 01:26, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability is clearly established 

message: Please do not change the type of album while the AfD is still open. Thank you. Amsaim (talk) 20:38, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay Do you also want to leave in :Category:Demo albums, as it was here before the AfD as well? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:38, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Shouldn't the type be either "demo" or "compilation" as per Template:Infobox Album#Type? It certainly was recorded in a studio, but it wasn't released as a studio album. Even the lead sentence states compilation. So where is the consensus that it's a studio album? --Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:56, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: None There isn't one. Nor is there one to call it a compilation (which it plainly isn't.) Amsaim wants to take this directly to AN/I and AN/V (three times in total) without ever responding on this talk or posting to mine. He either doesn't understand or doesn't care about the nature of consensus. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:38, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  So the entire set of demos was recorded in a single session and wasn't released individually on cassette at concerts? --Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:46, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

text:  The consensus points to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Roxx Regime Demos and no consensus about whether they're demos or a compilation is reached there, although I tend to favour the idea that they're a compilation as per the discussion there. There is never even the suggestion that they should be considered a studio album. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:54, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

text: This should be categorized as a compilation album.  It's a compilation of demos, but a compilation nonetheless.  The allmusic link lists it as a compilation.  Allmusic is a WP:RS.  Seems pretty straightforward to me.  That link is even used to cite it being called a compilation in the body of the article.  Clearly, the infobox should match, and be changed to compilation. <B>Torchiest</B> (talk | contribs) 21:34, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

text: I'm sorry, I thought with admin intervention, it had been determined that compilation was the correct listing. <B>Torchiest</B> (talk | contribs) 05:07, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Was there an admin? I tend to agree with listing the album as a compilation, but I think it's best to leave it for a few days to determine what a few interested sides have to say, not just those of use who are on Wikipedia too much :) . --Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:51, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes made to type of album (studio or demo) 

message: The Rolling Stone link is broken as a result of a massive restucturing of that site; see Wikipedia_talk:Record_charts#Rolling_Stone.3F for discussion about this.  The only place on the entire site the even mentions Stryper I can find is: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/;kw=[8622,33643] Note the horrendous code and the square brackets that will need to be coded as %5B and %5D to avoid breaking the wiki markup, ie as http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/;kw=%5B8622,33643%5D: compare 
*[8622,33643 this]
*and this
 ...  --Jubilee♫clipman 22:12, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourcing from ''Rolling Stone''

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Roxx Regime Demos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100317111841/http://www.stryper.com/Discography/Albums/albums.htm to http://www.stryper.com/Discography/Albums/albums.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:13, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified