lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Antipas, Cotabato

message: hiloo cana-an antipas cotabato..................im here in tagum city davao del norte..............i am a college student of tagum city institute of technology foundation,inc.
musta na kaU dyan,........musta na family ko sa cana-an........sana nasa mabuti kaung kalagayan....ingats kaU dyan...........ilove U
FaBa
ilove U all...................
MABUHAY ANTIPAS NORTH COTABATO......................
MAYOR.CRIS CADUNGON
BY:janfernan_fankers@yahoo.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.99.118 (talk) 07:44, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

message: the coordinates of antipas should be 7.25,125.05, please change the data.
The following coordinate fixes are needed for —Evaristo26 (talk) 00:21, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: by requester. — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 15:19, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 
Talk:M'lang

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.mlang.gov.ph/index.php/about-mlang/the-municipality-of-mlang.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 03:47, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Libungan

message: 112.210.202.108 have change the official language to Manobo. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Libungan%2C_Cotabato&action=historysubmit&diff=432130932&oldid=427023428  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonvallite (talk • contribs) 07:22, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another vandal 
Talk:Escalante, Negros Occidental

message: There is a discussion regarding the removal of the word "city" from the article titles of Philippine cities.  This may imminently affect the article name for .  For city names which are not unique, disambiguation alternatives are also being presented.  Formal request for page move may follow after a reasonable time of discussion.  If you wish to participate, please post your comments here.  --JinJian (talk) 05:09, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: <Cityname> 
<City>


message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Alaminos City which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 06:16, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Extreme points of the Philippines

message: This should be included in the list as well. --Filipinayzd (talk) 15:43, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: But it is not an extreme point. --Howard the Duck 16:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

text: I've added  tags to both articles. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:04, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Geographic Center

message: Im not sure what "extreme points" refer to now, shouldn't they be the farthest point on land (i.e, Saluag Island in Tawi-Tawi instead of Frances Reef tho it may be farther?) or are undersea features also considered? Cos if they are, then I guess we should also adjust our east point at Benham Rise and the west point at the westernmost reef/cay being claimed by the Philippines in the Spratly Islands? --RioHondo (talk) 14:53, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Undersea features as extreme points?

message: Added here the Pole of inaccessibility for Luzon and Mindanao.  The way I did this was to use a radius tool in Mapdevelopers, and try to fit the biggest size of the circle in Luzon as well as Mindanao.  From there, the center point of the circle was marked as the Point of Inaccessibility. Bootkinero (talk) 06:03, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Pole of Inaccessibility

message: Wikipedia is not a venue for self-promotion and use of the project for promotion is forbidden and can lead to loss of editing privileges and blacklisting of sites. Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, so additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. DrexelWiki (talk) 17:46, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refrences 

message: Re Southernmost island (1968): Sebatik Island, Sabah 4°10′02″N 117°47′02″E:
The article for Sebatik Island says it is split between Indonesia and Malaysia, with no part of it claimed or in the Philippines. The table in reference 4 does not mention Sabatik, either; its southernmost point is Frances Reef, at 4º24’54".
Therefore I am going to be bold and remove the pertinent line. Dgndenver (talk) 02:46, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sebatik Island
Talk:Croxetti

message: Both articles indicate that the pasta are similar to one another, and I have at least one source indicating that they are, indeed, the same thing - which would make sense given the fact they come from the very same area and seem to have no discernible elements. Thoughts? Popo le Chien throw a bone 17:19, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: After discussion with Italian contributors as well. Popo le Chien throw a bone 08:03, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[corzetti]]?
Talk:High Forest (Forgotten Realms)

message: The name of this page conflicts with one needed on high forest, a woodland structure and its associated management techniques.
I therefore propose that this page is moved to High Forest (Forgotten Realms), and is replaced with a disambiguation page directing thence and also to a new one called High forest (woodland).
Any comments please?--Richard New Forest 13:43, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move
Talk:Story of Pao

message: Heck I can`t speak Vietnamese..should cua be capitalised or not? If so please move page Andycjp 13:44, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Limay

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this subsection with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Oppose move of Limay: I don't see the Philippine municipality as having more long-term significance than the municipality in France or the river of Argentina. It may receive more pageviews, but this fact becomes largely irrelevant if you consider that the dab page itself receives barely any views (about one hit every other day), so there'll be very few readers who will benefit from being taken directly to this article. – Uanfala (talk) 13:40, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Orani

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this subsection with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Oppose. Judging by the relative popularity of the two main articles, Orani, Bataan is a winner by a wide margin, but the pageviews for the dab page itself are so low – barely one hit each day – that any attempt to infer actual usage is likely to get lost in the statistical noise. More to the point, I don't see a reason why the Philippine municipality should necessarily have more longer term significance than the Italian one (its higher population notwithstanding). Also, noting that I've added a few more entries to the dab, mostly minor (except for the "see also" entry for a major region of Algeria). – Uanfala (talk) 13:17, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Abucay

message: This article could use some cleanup as the grammar in some places is off. Usb10 (Let's talk 'bout it!) 02:06, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 
Talk:Philippine kinship

message: I have removed a post by a retired editor who recommended that this article be moved because it was too short. This article has been lengthened and more reference has been added, and thus should be considered as new when evaluating. I would also like to note that in my research on this subject I have been able to find very few authoritative references on the Tagalog language and its colloquial use of familial terms. I see new references popping up all the time and will revisit this article in a few months and see if I can add more good citations and informative references. Feel free to do so if you have access to anything that will help.
HaztechGuy (talk) 03:48, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think your edits are good, and really help expound upon the topic.  Thanks! - Alvincura (talk) 18:41, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

message: This article mentions Cantonese as the source of some of the Kinship terms. That is incorrect. The source is Hokkien. The term kuya is from Hokkien kuya (姑爺), and was originally used by in-laws to call their son-in-law. 
It would also be good if the page explained that kapatid, kapatid na lalake, etc. are dervied and not basic terms. The root and affixes could be explained.
112.204.3.76 (talk) 11:33, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  incorrect ascription of origin of term 

message: Where are the references for this article especially in the introduction? 136.158.57.18 (talk) 23:13, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  References for this article?
Talk:290 (number)

message: 293 is a special number since there are 293 ways to make change for a one dollar bill. Can we include this? Atomicswoosh (talk) 04:34, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think not, because that's only true if you include 50 cent and 1 dollar coins. See this post that explains more about this "Snapple fact". Mark M (talk) 15:57, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Snapple Fact
Talk:Green Cross International

message: The bibliography appears to be a publications catalogue, ie advertising. The article is referenced entirely to the organisation's own website. This looks promotional. Shouldn't this be changed? OsFish (talk) 12:30, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography/references - is this advertising? 

message: I would oppose a deletion on the grounds that there are clearly lots of mentions to be found through google news, Google Scholar and google books. The subject is notable. I know it is better for me demonstrate the case by editing the page, but as I don't have much time right now, I thought I would post this to help others.OsFish (talk) 08:12, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion? 
Template talk:V for Vendetta

message: I've removed this template from all its articles.
Which, I agree, is fairly provocative. However, I don't see how "V for Vendetta" deserves this on its own, or what useful information it provides. Surely the links in the articles are sufficient? If people want to revert my changes, that's fine by me. But please reply to this post so we can get a discussion started. At the moment I see no reason why the template should exist.
At the very least, I think you should make it a collapsible template (like, for example, the Alan Moore one) so it isn't as intrusive. Maccy69 14:00, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I've made it into a less obtrusive, collapsible, template. I'm a bit happier if people put it back into articles, now (although I still don't see the point). I also removed the link to This Vicious Cabaret as it only redirects to the main article, anyway. Maccy69 14:50, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted my edits on all the articles and requested a template deletion instead, see below. Maccy69 17:47, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What purpose does this serve? 

message: Template: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Maccy69 17:47, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of [[:Template:{{ucfirst:V for Vendetta}}]]
Category talk:Korean War destroyers of the United States

message: You are missing Desron 11 completly:
USS Wiltsie DD 716
USS Hamner DD 717
USS Chandler DD 718
USS Chevalier DDR 805
This group was DesRon 11 of Des Div 111.  Wiltsie was the command ship.
First group of destroyers to go to Korea in 1950.  Served nine months 50/51, seven months, 51/52/  and returned for the third time January 1953 till the end of the firing. 
Repectfully submitted, Hartley Johnston ( ET, USS Wiltsie DD 716, October 1950 -  January 53.)
----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.151.171.200 (talk) 02:41, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.  Thank you for bringing this to our attention. TomTheHand (talk) 20:35, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Ships
Talk:384 (number)

message: As far as I know, each of the 6 lines can have any of 4 values (moving/static yin/yang) for 2^12 or 4096 possible hexagrams. Does anyone know where the 384 figure came from?
Almonaster (talk) 02:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Ching
Talk:A Second Chance at Eden

message: This is an encyclopedia, not an ad. This kind of teaser-text is not appropriate; "but leading where? And is the craft as empty as it seems?", I don't know, that's why I looked it up in an encyclopedia. Can someone who has read the collection, or can find an appropriate source, replace the teaser-text with actual plot details?
-- PaulxSA (talk) 05:25, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoilers good / Teasers bad
Talk:Miami Township, Clermont County, Ohio

message: I have repeatedly reverted changes by  for several reasons:
*He is uploading vast amounts of text from the township website with nothing on the website to permit such copy/pasting and no attribution to the township website
*He is deleting large amounts of sourced, properly formatted text
*His text introductions are altogether unwikified, and his pictures' licenses are doubtful, except for the obviously copyvio seal that he has twice uploaded
*His edits are drastically POV: "Today, Miami Township hosts major employers, offers an extensive selection of newer homes, a high level of services and an excellent quality of life."
Nyttend 14:11, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: the post above refers to edits like this one.  — Athaenara  ✉  23:40, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I've warned the user with  and prepared a report for WP:AN/3RR in case this continues.  — Athaenara  ✉  01:10, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry to say that I accidentally violated 3RR: not because I was intending to win at all costs, but because I wasn't paying attention.  We may do more than three reversions in the case of vandalism, and this seems to me somewhat like it, but I still shouldn't have done that and didn't mean to.  Nyttend 01:17, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I understand that, sorry if I wasn't clear.  Your edit summary here certainly supports my perception that you're conscientious :-) — Athaenara  ✉  01:46, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Timpennington reverted again and also attempted a content fork ("Miami Township in Clermont County, Ohio USA").  My report of his 3RR violation is here.  — Athaenara  ✉  06:30, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

text: (An administrator blocked him for 24 hours.)  — Athaenara  ✉  06:33, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Timpennington's changes
Talk:Scalphunter (Marvel Comics)

message: The character's alias has been changed to his surname Greycrow recently as the former alias portrays native americans in a negative light. With that in mind i suggest moving this page to "Greycrow".
Intoxicação_Alimentar (talk) 03:04, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving the page due to the character's alias
Talk:Kalingalan Caluang

message: I am Elcanir Tawasil, my great grandfather was Hadji Hassan Tawasil son of Maharadja tawasil,sad to say the leaders in our place are Corrupt, Dictator, Uneducated person, Unethical didnt even know how to make his flatform for land and people. this political dynasty should end and eliminate. thank you  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.118.141.4 (talk) 12:57, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  political corruption 
Talk:Panamao

message: Official name of municipality is Panamao, conventially it is referred to as Old Panamao or Panamao (Old) to differentiate it from New Panamao, created under PD 1663,  that was renamed a year later to Panglima Estino under PD 1757. 
Commission on Audit refers to the municipality as Panamao, see. As of 1995, laws that refer to the municipality used only Panamao, see. -- Namayan (talk) 03:01, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official name is still Panamao
Talk:Maimbung

message: It is horrible, when just now, the bodies were exhumed here: torture and genocide to exhume bodies of ‘Maimbung massacre victims' --Florentino floro (talk) 06:45, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: February massacre
Talk:Patikul

message: Very short article. It's best to be merged to the article of the municipality itself (with addition of history or a relevantly-worded section for the article "Patikul"). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:48, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Patikul, Sulu shootout]] into [[Patikul]]
Talk:Texas RioGrande Legal Aid

message: this article is important because this organization is the largest legal aid provider in Texas and the third largest in the state.  it is an important firm that is largely funded by the legal services corporation.  most importantly, looking at the lsc wiki page, it seems that wiki is generally lacking information on legal aid providers.
Enygma8 14:25, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 06:24, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:S.O.S (Jonas Brothers song)

message: This image looks more like fan-made to me. i mean there's a username and it's blurry! ♥, calliegal_x (talk) 04:46, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Correct title for this song is "S.O.S." (with final period). 128.151.71.16 (talk) 21:49, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Eyewitness identification

message: So far this article is very focussed towards the US. I will enter some information about English law and rearrange to allow for information about other jurisdictions to be entered.Dubitante 14:29, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: International focus

message: I marked the article for POV-check, because the article as it stands seems to be more concerned with presenting arguments that eyewitness identification is unreliable than with giving a good overview of eyewitness identification. For example, the article begins with the criticism "Eyewitness identification evidence is the leading cause of wrongful conviction in the United States. Of the more than 200 people exonerated by way of DNA evidence in the US, over 75% were wrongfully convicted on the basis of erroneous eyewitness identification evidence," not even bothering to describe what eyewitness identification is and explain how it fits into and affects legal proceedings.
Pahan (talk) 00:28, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible [[NPOV]] problem 

message: Part of the POV problem of this article, in addition to the content of the "Causes of Eyewitness Error" section, is its placement above the section that explains how such testimony is admitted ("The Law of Eyewitness Identification..."). Can anyone explain why they shouldn't be reversed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.73.119.217 (talk) 04:02, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section order 

message: A significant number of researchers in this area also make money by testifying about their academic research. They also have edited out several additions I have contributed that cite to articles critical of the academic studies they rely on. This is both anti-wikipedia, and also shows how defensive these "experts" can be when they are criticized. It is unfortunate to have to continually replace the critical sections because these Eyewitness ID accolytes do not want to acknowledge contrary views.
Womenshoops (talk) 21:23, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unediting by accolytes 

message: I think that the section on the Illinois report isn't good enough! I may find time to fix it but it needs work. It may even be important enough to write an article about it.RobertHannah89 (talk) 05:43, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The Illinois Report

message: Is there any academic work specifically on the reliability of witness identification of colour (e.g. of clothing, vehicles, etc.)?Gilmorehill (talk) 12:23, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Colour

message: I think Psychologist Elizabeth Loftus' research on the weapon-focus effect mentioned very briefly. The description of the study can be more detailed to provide a better explanation of the relationship between the focus shift and eyewitness identification. Elif Tunaboylu (talk) 11:26, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Presence of a Weapon
Talk:Areas of Aberdeen

message: These columns are presently entirely empty and should probably be removed or put to use. Do people feel that longitude/latitude co-ordinates (which could be auto-linked to maps) are possible and non-misleading (i.e. not overly precise to a fixed point) for these areas? Or would a concise textual description, perhaps just compass points and distances relative to the city centre, be better? Or even reference to boundary roads/features, if these can be established? – Kieran T (talk) 01:29, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I was puzzled by these empty columns.  I think the location should be a simple coordinate (with :Template:Coord) or grid reference (with :Template:Gbmapping).  Anything else might get complicated and controversial — some of these areas probably have no formally defined boundaries (where exactly is "West End", for example?).  I think I would remove the "Notes" column unless anyone can come up with a good (i.e. well-defined) purpose for it.  --Deskford (talk) 09:36, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've put in the location data for the first two entries with articles, which already highlights that the first article locates Altens with woeful inaccuracy. But it's a start. Does anyone know if there's already an equivalent of the coords geohack template for OS references? – Kieran T (talk) 11:08, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the first few grid references....  --Deskford (talk) 12:14, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location and notes columns