Talk:Skweee

message: I thought it'd be more interesting to link to Swedish music rather than Norwegian, since that's what the article mentions. 213.132.125.46 — Preceding undated comment added 21:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As I initialized and wrote most of this article i felt obliged to add some references. Not much, besides this article - Actually this article seems to be the main source of primary information for other media covering the subject. Simono (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 09:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

text: You have done no such thing. Notability has not been addressed... you mention Spin, but where is the sourcing? Myspace links in the body of articles are not acceptable at any stage... you're making the page look like an advert. There is no distinction whatsoever between Myspace and Myspace Music; if that's the band's only website that's a fairly good indication that it isn't notable. You preferably need substantial coverage in third-party, commercially published print sources to establish notability. Spin will be a start if you actually source it properly. Don't remove tags without addressing the issues properly, don't remove categories... that's vandalism, plain and simple, without justification. Finally, "an impressive twenty-two releases"? Seriously? Blackmetalbaz (talk) 14:43, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In the interests of genuinely trying to be helpful, I'm looking at the Spin website. A search for "skweee" reveals nothing; there's no mention on the page for April 2009. Google Books, News and Scholar similarly turn up nothing. If sources aren't produced (that don't include Myspace links) this may well be an AfD candidate. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 14:53, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Blackmetalbaz is 100% correct. Skweee = lo-fi electronica. NOT a new genre. Please people. Use your brains. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.185.130.13 (talk) 07:11, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: well, then: Skweee = a genre of lo-fi electronica — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.232.228.210 (talk) 10:46, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: say what? chiptunes are lo-fi electronica. You could make a skweee album using James Brown samples and a Casio keyboard from 2007. I would simply say it's underground. And to Fashoom, not every single skweee record label uses Myspace as their homepage... are you sure you didn't post that in 2005? AfD or not, skweee doesn't need a Wikipedia article to be recognized as a fun, legitimate genre by its legions of european fans. Just wait until it gets big in the US and UK, and you'll have lots o kiddies spamming this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.251.224.75 (talk) 22:10, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Skweee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091214135721/http://www.myspace.com:80/lofifunk.records to http://www.myspace.com/lofifunk.records
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:30, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The first link in the recognition section must have moved/been deleted, and now redirects to a shady looking site. 73.250.3.159 (talk) 01:44, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malicious link