Talk:List of Disneyland attractions

message: Hasn't "Mr. Toad's Wild Ride" been replaced with Pooh?  Or is that only at Disneyworld? Also, the page contains a "spoiler" warning without any actual spoilers. - Nunh-huh
:I haven't been to DW, but at DL, Toad & Pooh are in different parts of the park. Mr. Toad is still a popular ride.  I wouldn't object to spoiler note  being removed. Elf | Talk 00:11, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Good to know. It's a favorite ride of those who visited as children...and surprisingly scary at that age. The closing in WDW was a scandal... - Nunh-huh 00:14, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Mr. Toad's Wild Ride

message: Should we italicize the names of the rides/attractions? I don't think the Wikipedia style guide says anything about this one way or another. -Branddobbe 19:12, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it's needed. The main entries here are already bold, which is plenty. The names within sentences are all capitalized (except it's a small world ;-) ) and I think that's plenty. Italics are harder to read and, with so many attraction names used in the various disneyland articles, it could start looking cluttered without adding any new information.  Just curious why you were thinking about this, though, in case I've missed something obvious.  Elf | Talk 20:22, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I was looking through some articles on Disneyland rides, and while most weren't italicized, some were, and I was just wondering if there was some sort of policy on that. -Branddobbe 20:30, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

text: Hmmm, not that I know of. Let's make one! :-)  I vote for using bold if needed rather than italic.  But then, I haven't looked at lots of the other Disney or other types of amusement park articles to conduct a poll as to what's really out there. I'm guessing that'll be what someone oughta do to form a recommended policy statement.  Elf | Talk 20:37, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Standardization

message: Currently the Star Tours description states:
 The riders are "supposed to" be taking a trip on a space cruiser to the 
 forest moon of Endor, but the robotic pilot (voiced by Paul Reubens) 
 manages to mess things up and get the ship into all sorts of trouble, 
 including icy comets and battles at the Death Star, before safely 
 making it to the moon, where the passengers disembark.
I believe this is incorrect where it states that disembarkment occurs at the Endor moon.  Rex passes the moon and that's when the comets happen.  Disembarkment happens after returning to the Star Tours' base.  If memory serves C3PO states, "We hope you have enjoyed your visit to the Endor moon".  I will correct that in the article.
Kinglag 21:23, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Star Tours

message: The change to 1/100 scale in reference to the Matterhorn Bobsleds is correct.  The ride is 147 feet tall and the mountain 14,693.
Ryan Moore 21:30, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Height Discrepancy

message: I'd like to know what others think about the inclusion of Club 33 in this list.  An anonymous editor has recently added it here. I believe it shouldn't be included here, but I'm certainly willing to entertain logical counterarguments.  My reasoning is that as a restaurant (and especially as a private club), Club 33 doesn't fit Disney's definition of an "attraction" ("rides, shows, and exhibits," according to the lead), and so it doesn't belong in a "list of Disneyland attractions".  Disneyland's own literature doesn't appear to categorize Club 33 as an attraction.  Our list currently doesn't include any other restaurants or park features inaccessible to the general public; why make an exception for this one?  Anyway, that's my thinking. Would anybody like to add an argument either way? AtticusX (talk) 01:51, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That seems reasonable. Maybe the link could be shifted to the see also section rather than removed entirely? Themeparkgc  Talk  01:35, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Club 33: an attraction?