Talk:Rambo III

message: "This was then edited to read "people of Afghanistan" during the post 9/11 era. A shining example of the hyocricy of American foreign policy. When the Mujahideen were fighting Russian invaders, they were "brave fighters" suitable to having Hollywood movies in their honor. But when they are fighting American invaders, they are terrorists and savages."
Changing this because it's ridiculous, I've had editors nit pick minor edits so how on earth did this one get missed...
N3v (talk) 16:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 2011 comment

message: The prescense of cultural developments and relations are so represented in Rambo III, and when it came out on my Birthday, I was sincerely in awe. Personal beliefs have nothing to do with films? This makes no sense in reality, and Wikipedia could be a little more personal sometimes. Is this such a bias idea? Tigger v/s Fox75.203.143.63 (talk) 08:15, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rambo 

message: In the article it says: 
"The original VHS release had in the end credits: "Dedicated to the brave Mujahideen fighters", although this was later changed to "Dedicated to the gallant people of Afghanistan."[11]"
I really have to question that because I saw it in the theaters and on VHS/TV and I don't remember such a dedication. It was always "to the gallant people of Afghanistan". Researching this further in the New York Times Archives, I came across a May 25, 1988 review of the movie (by Janet Maslin) that said this: 
"'Rambo III is dedicated to the gallant people of Afghanistan, and it clearly intends that its politics be taken seriously."   
I also confirmed this in a few other books published prior to 9/11/01: 'Civil War in Pop Culture' (on p.152) and 'Vietnam war films: over 600 feature, made-for-TV,.....' (on p.355). Both books were published in the 90's. 
I also remember seeing 'People of Afghanistan' in 80s, but in my mind registered as 'Brave People of Afghanistan' Hydman (talk) 19:44, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I am inclined to agree with you. Someone would have to buy a vintage tape off eBay and watch it. I don't think it will be easy to remove this entirely from the article because people have convinced themselves this is a real thing and may even falsely remember seeing this. I initially believed this story but having looked at the discussions on Reddit and StackExchange I now think the still images showing the Mujahideen dedication are doctored as they don't use the same background scene. I think it is likely someone started the hoax by taking a scene at the end without any text superimposed and took a still and added the text in digitally. I personally have never seen a video excerpt online of the credits showing this dedication. The problem is that the hoax has been picked up by movie trivia sites so anyone who doesn't want this removed from Wikipedia will say it is has citations (from sources that are likely wrong and themselves not sourced). Rja13ww33 can you please add a line to that section in the article saying there is now scepticism regarding the truth of this story, citing the sources you mention above to support this view? That way people visiting the page can make their own evaluation. Simgrant (talk) 00:53, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Let me think of a way to state it that captures both sides of the argument and I will post it here and see what you think. (I like to build a consensus (on the talk page) before I change anything to avoid a edit war.) Give me about a day or two to think it over.Rja13ww33 (talk) 01:14, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, how about this: “Some have claimed that the dedication at the end of the film has been altered at various points in response to the events of 9/11. [Insert Ref to Imdb here]. Specifically it is claimed that the dedication was (at one point) “to the brave Mujahideen fighters” and then later changed to “to the gallant people of Afghanistan”. However, reviews of the film upon its release and later publications (prior to 9/11) show that the film was dedicated “to the gallant people of Afghanistan” prior to 9/11.[Insert the references I cited here]”Rja13ww33 (talk) 03:00, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds fair and balanced, make the edit. Will wait and see if anyone disputes this. Simgrant (talk) 03:35, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Thanks for your feedback.Rja13ww33 (talk) 00:28, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone has taken out the IMDB reference for the claim of a altered dedication as IMDB is not a reliable source. I agree, but the whole point here is that it is a internet legend. Does IMDB have to be considered reliable even as proof of a urban legend? Let me know what you think. For now, I will revert the edit. But lets discuss it here.Rja13ww33 (talk) 15:57, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: IMDB is not a reliable source, so rumours and "internet legends" should not be sourced to it. If a reliable source cannot be found for the claim then it should be removed altogether. Betty Logan (talk) 16:34, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure how you can have a reliable source for what is essentially a internet legend in the first place. If it was that reliable, it would not be claiming it. Looking around, I've seen it on reddit.com and mentalfloss.com. I've seen it debunked on some skeptic web sites. (Perhaps that is sufficient.) Maybe there is a way to ID it as a internet rumor (which wiki has debunked in its articles before) and then take it on with the info I found.Rja13ww33 (talk) 19:20, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: If it has never appeared in a reliable source how can you know it is a "legend"? People add bullshit to IMDB and Reddit all the time. If this claim has not been investigated by somebody with an iota of credibility then it shouldn't be on Wikipedia. Betty Logan (talk) 19:42, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I know it is a legend because it is all over the place. (Including a previous edit of this article that was up for quite some time before I changed it). Just Google it. If it is as wide spread as that, is it not worth addressing? As far as credible people addressing it, not sure if you consider skeptics.stackexchange.com credible, but they debunk it there.Rja13ww33 (talk) 20:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: If reliable sources don't cover it then it is most likely not notable enough to include in the article. Betty Logan (talk) 20:49, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't know about earlier releases, but the newest 4k UHD version of this film includes a dedication to the Mujahideem fighters and it's a new scan of the original film.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.144.238.218 (talk) 06:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

text: Ironically it turns out years ago I reverted a change which removed this edit years ago because I believed it was a true story at the time. Now that I have seen the reviews contemporary with the films original theatrical release, which say it was dedicated to the "gallant people of Afghanistan", I am convinced I was wrong. Simgrant (talk) 01:02, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Betty. The reason I used "claim" is because I couldn't think of a better way (but looks like you have). MOS:CLAIM doesn't prohibit the use of the word....it just (as you say) cautions against it. As far as the dedication itself goes, as I said in a edit summary, I cannot find a single source written prior to 9/11 that says anything other than the "gallant people of Afghanistan". The NYT review notes it and it makes virtually no sense that it was altered after release (prior to 9/11) then changed back to the original after 9/11. My guess on this (if there is any truth to it at all) is perhaps a release in another country had this wording. But I have seen no proof to that affect. I saw it myself in it's original release (in American theatres) and it had the "gallant" dedication.Rja13ww33 (talk) 16:49, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I am pretty satisfied with 's change so the sentence is in line with WP: CLAIM now. As for the factual accuracy of the mentioned change from "to the brave Mujahideen fighters", I am not really interested in continuing an edit war over it so I am fine whatever. Not going to push the matter further. My only regret is I cann't at least upload a picture of the movie's ending on my old VHS that I mentioned (confirming it says Mujahideen), since it would be considered OR. I think the reason you have not seen this version of the ending is because in Europe we had movies on VHS mostly distributed from the UK, which changed the movie titles on occasion for instance or often cut some scenes, etc. In any case cheers and happy editing! :) EkoGraf (talk) 01:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: If you still have the video tape it can be cited as a primary source. Obviously we can't use the image but if we had sufficient citation details (i.e. distributor/year) then we can cite the tape as an example of a release that actually had this testimony. Betty Logan (talk) 02:37, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've got a VHS version of the movie around too. Will see if I can hunt it down. (And cross compare if necessary.)Rja13ww33 (talk) 02:49, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

text: Ok....FOUND IT. (Lots of digging in a junk/storage room of mine.) This is a 1998 VHS release by Artisan Entertainment. And the dedication at the end is to the "gallant people of Afghanistan". Also, I borrowed a version of the DVD made in 2004 off of someone I know because it had a director's commentary version. The director said nothing about any change of the dedication (also to the "gallant people of Afghanistan") when it came up. If anyone needs anymore info: let me know. And by the way, I think I have another VHS version as well (earlier; IIRC, I got the Artisan version because it was re-mastered). If I find it, will post that as well.Rja13ww33 (talk) 17:06, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dedication 

message: The only portion listed under accolades are golden raspberry awards, which really are not accolades. Could that be changed to 'Awards'? Hydman (talk) 19:44, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Accolades?