lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:James Alexander Smith

message: Um if his real name is James Alexander Glenn, why isn't the article in that name space, this doesn't say why its under James Alexander Smith. --Cloveious 00:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real name 

message: States in the piece that the first wounded soldier had laid against the enemy trenches for 15 hours.
The Wiki page of Abraham Acton, Smith's co-rescuer, says it was 75 hours.
I don't know which statement is true and which an error. 80.3.108.32 (talk) 18:29, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  First rescue
Talk:The Tale of Little Pig Robinson

message: This story is about a terrifying world where animals think and act like humans but it's morally acceptable to kill them.  The UK homicide law refers to the killing of "any reasonable creature (human being)". Homicide: Murder and Manslaughter  This would theoretically include the imaginary anthropomorphic animals in Beatrix Potter and other similar stories.  Perhaps the moral implications weren't considered because the whole story is imaginary.  Perhaps 19th century people were more influenced by JudeoChristian ideas that humans have dominion over animals and paid less attention to the imagined intelligence of the anthropomorphic animal. Proxima Centauri (talk) 18:06, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Great job on the history and explanation of the story but watch out for a few little grammatical errors. Maybe try to add more to the criticism section by adding something that talks highly of story to show that not everyone thought it was bad or too long. Hope this helps! --Jennie Sites (talk) 16:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Great job...
Talk:Constance Binney

message: It would be helpful to ascertain when the marriage to Leonard Cheshire legally ended.  His Wikipedia biography states he was still legally married to her throughout his relationship (1945 to 1948) with Joan Botting, which produced an illegitimate child.  Cheshire omitted the marriage from his Who's Who entry, but it must surely have been dissolved by the time he married Sue Ryder.Cloptonson (talk) 20:00, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Marriage Duration
Talk:Atlanta Cyclorama & Civil War Museum

message: Atlanta Cyclorama needs restoration, maybe much more some contend 
City's tourism execs, historians, inspired by renovation of Gettysburg exhibit. Sept 14, 2008.
http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/living/stories/2008/09/14/atlanta_cyclorama_restoration.html
rumjal 03:38, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Restoration
Talk:The Tale of Mrs. Tittlemouse

message: We have a :Category:Home invasions in film but no corresponding category for books, unfortunately, as this article would belong there. (I do think it was ungrateful of Mrs Tittlemouse to narrow her door to keep Mr Jackson out when he was the one who rid her of the bumblebees while she was having her OCD panic attack.) —Mahāgaja · talk 09:51, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home invasion
Talk:The Tale of the Flopsy Bunnies

message: uhm this is a little unrealistic considering the family-relationship (made it up :>) of benjamin and flopsy (it may be mopsy or cotton-tail but idk)
sry that im too lazy to use grammar Mapleya (MAY-peel-YUH) (talk) 04:27, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  ...
Talk:The Tale of the Pie and the Patty-Pan

message: I think this section is probably largely redundant, since we have an entire biography of Beatrix Potter already; the exception is its final sentence and a half, which could be incorporated in the appropriate place within the following section "Development and Publication". Does anyone have any serious objection if the "Background" section is cut, so we can get straight to the background of the story's creation? Alfietucker (talk) 00:17, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, a whole week has gone by without any objection being raised, so I'll go ahead and cut "Background". I've transferred some of its more unique information over to the main Beatrix Potter article. Alfietucker (talk) 22:31, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background 

message: This is a good article where 86% of the prose comes from LTA ItsLassieTime and their sock Susanne2009NYC. The article is listed at WP:CCI on the ItsLassieTime case. I think that this needs a careful review, but ILT has a penchant for using plenty of offline source so this may be difficult. There is a high level of copyright violations within this CCI, but I don't want this delisted sheerly for the sake of being edited by a sock and therefore subject to WP:CVREPEAT and presumptive deletion. Sennecaster (Chat) 17:37, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright issues
Talk:The Talisman Ring

message: The English could be better in the article '...much to his crossness' should surely be 'indignation'? The tone does read more like an article by an avid fan rather than something objective, ie, the description of the character of Ludovic Lavenham 'a very romantic character' etc. There's only one very positive quote given by way of criticism of the novel. I'm no expert on Heyer, and that image of that old cover was excellent, but I was looking for some links to a series of reviews ranging from glowing to disparaging, etc, and was disappointed just to find this.

Having said that, I realize that there isn't a lot of criticism on historical romance as it's popular literature. I'm dong a bit of research into the development of it, and have drawn a blank myself with  any serious criticism.
{{Kinrid 24 October 2014}  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.169.0.201 (talk) 10:30, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Talk:James Forbes-Robertson

message: The article has him down as being a Scot, born in Strathpeffer, Scotland, Yet in April of this year a Commemorative flagstone was laid down for him in Brighouse, England, saying he was born there. It's the Government who decide where the commemorative stones go, i.e. their birthplace. See:- https://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/news/brighouse-war-hero-awarded-victoria-cross-given-lasting-memorial-1-9127099
He cannot be born in two places at once and if Born in Brighouse he is English not Scottish.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.20.216.145 (talk) 14:17, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is something seriously wrong here 

message: This distinctive surname was notable for many years in the West End theatre. Is he any relation to any of the theatrcal Forbes-Robertsons? It's the first question many would be asking. Valetude (talk) 21:26, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any relation?
Talk:James Henry Reynolds

message: So, was he Protestant? The reason I ask is because the article on Rorke's Drift lists all those who received the Victoria Cross. There is one Irishman listed and it is this man. Other sites state that over 20% of those who fought at Rourke's Drift were Irish and the anti-Catholicism/Irish of the British Army throughout World War I was infamous so....? 89.100.195.42 16:39, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:James Hills-Johnes

message: 'Appointed a Knight Commander of the Order of the Bath in 1881 and advanced to Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the Bath in 1893, he later achieved the rank of lieutenant general in the service of the Royal Artillery. ... Hills-Johnes was High Sheriff of Carmarthenshire in 1886 ...'
This suggests that the retired from the British Army in the mid-1880s. Why was he made lieutenant-general after he retired. Generals are not promoted for corps or regimental service but higher command. Anthony Staunton (talk) 13:00, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lieutenant-General
Talk:James Langley Dalton

message: The crown copyright protected material (other than the Royal Arms and department logos) may be reused free of charge in any format or medium research for non-commercial purposes, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject to the material being reused accurately and not used in a misleading context. Where any of the Crown copyright material on this website is being republished or copied to others, the source of the material must be identified and the copyright status acknowledged.
http://www.army.mod.uk/rlc/a_proud_tradition/james_dalton.htm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaintes (talk • contribs) 02:56, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crown Copyright for Dalton Material 

message: i'd think it would be "in the act of _assagaing_ him," yes?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.98.118.254 (talk) 18:37, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "in the act of assuaging him?" 
Talk:The Temple and the Lodge

message: Notability is not a solid requirement for encyclopedic inclusion.  Being a book, it is certainly verifiable, and the book was authored by two prominent people within their field.  Granted, the article is a stub (and has been for awhile), there's no reason to for its deletion. —№tǒŖïøŭş4lĭfė ♫♪ 03:49, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Terrible Old Man

message: The Synopsis seem to include details not in the story (my copy of the story anyway). I find no mention of jewels, only old gold and silver coins. No mention of the car beeing vintage. And no mention of the boddies actually washing up at a beach. Are there different versions of the story maybe, or just a mistake? Ttias (talk) 12:18, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some details
Talk:James Morris Colquhoun Colvin

message: Much more info at Talk:Colvin family. BrainyBabe (talk) 14:32, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colvin connections 
Template talk:Reuben

message: What is the point of this template? Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 05:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To link between all related Reuben articles - much like Template:Metallica Ricmelia 09:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 21:58, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Theory of Political Coalitions

message: Dear Users,
I have an assignment to edit this Wikipedia page. I'm new to Wikipedia so if you have any problems with what I've done just let me know. I have Riker's book Theory of Political Coalitions in my possession and I will also use other theorists' work where they talk about his size principle.
I will be planning out my edits in my sandbox.
Kind regards
MorlockJoe (talk) 22:06, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future Edits
Talk:Chagall Guevara

message: I submit that this article be merged into the Steve Taylor article.  Basically, Taylor made a "band" out of Nashville session musicians, seeking to crossover into secular music.  They made one album that nobody bought. The only people who care about this "group" are Taylor fans, as the band was an extension of the performer. Yakuman 04:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion of this merger has been going on at Talk:Steve Taylor#Merger Suggestion. Sxeptomaniac 20:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Agree with the merge; disagree with the "band was an extension of the performer."  Mitchell k dwyer (talk) 21:27, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: Consider addition of box set by Steve Taylor, “Now The Truth Can Be Told.” The set includes 3 songs by Chagall Guevara from their eponymous album. “Escher’s World” is a unique edit, dropping the cross fade in the coda.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C5E:527F:EABE:7852:E7F5:3010:400 (talk) 04:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography
Talk:The Thirteen Problems

message: Could someone (who knows how to do it) have The Tuesday Club Murders, the American title, redirect to this article? The audiobook by The Audio Partners uses this title. I found this article only by the chance of the first short story having the same title, using Google search to find this article.  --Prairieplant (talk) 16:30, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  add redirect to this article for The Tuesday Club Murders?
Talk:John Augustus Wood

message: I believe that John Augustus Wood was born in Fort William, Bengal while his father, John Sullivan Wood, was stationed there, ie he is not Scottish, but of English descent.  Baptism date is given in FamilySearch as 17 Jul 1818, Calcutta, Bengal, India.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScotGirl52 (talk • contribs) 18:02, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Armando Morales Barillas

message: Being of Guatemalan heritage, I am very familiar with the town of Esquipulas being in Guatemala. Besides that, Barillas seems to be a common surname in Guatemala. This article may need to be completely rewritten, as well as the disambiguation page for Barillas. Lighthead þ 00:19, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nicaragua or Guatemala?
Talk:The Three Christs of Ypsilanti

message: I cited The Three Christs of Ypsilanti in the article dedicated to the book. It seems kinda redundant to cite a book on it's own wiki page, but I did use an excerpt from the actual book as a source. Could someone please tell me what is the most "correct" way to handle this situation? Should I use the book in the list of sources, just leave it out, or is there a better way to do this? Thanks!
Takaia (talk) 10:04, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using the Book Itself as a Source?
Talk:The Time Machine Did It

message: Adding a "This article does not cite its references or sources" tag to an entry about a book is redundant, isn't it? The book itself is the reference...
I'm sorry, but doesn't this article read like on big advertisement for the book? It's not exactly neutral or encyclopedic...81.86.117.129 16:00, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Although Double Wonderful is the 2nd book written by Swartzwelder, I removed it from the list since it does not feature Frank Burly. 204.115.253.51 17:26, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frank Burly 

message: My experience has been that Wikipedia doesn't usually allow articles about self-published books. Kennydale Books is the author's own company that only publishes his own books. The book itself isn't a bestseller or anything that might make it exceptional. Shouldn't this be merged with the article about John Schwartzwelder instead?--2601:8C3:8001:3940:1405:5A0C:CAD:BDD8 (talk) 02:57, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: No discussion x 8 months. Removing merge suggestion.  – S. Rich (talk) 01:30, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal
Talk:Texas State Highway 339

message: The article states that "SH 339 is completely contained in Duval County," which agrees with the TxDOT designation file. However, the southern terminus is at at SH 285, which never enters Duval County, so it would appear that at least a few feet of this highway is in Brooks County. (Complicating this further is the fact that, going northbound, there is a county line sign, but not a corresponding one southbound.) I'm leaving the prose as it is for now, since that's what the source we have says, but I feel like this might be worth researching further. --Kinu t/c 16:15, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Counties
Talk:The Titan's Curse

message: This article has quite a few spelling and grammar errors :o 72.192.55.156 (talk) 14:18, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: The character list seems general to the PJ books rather than specific to this one - this should be corrected. Robina Fox (talk) 07:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it is a character list specific to this one. Percy, Annabeth, Thalia, Grover, Zoë, and Bianca should be the main characters in this novel. I think we should change Nico into Bianca, since Nico didn't really get a lot of story in this one. Annabeth may also be considered to be removed...... I'm going to ask this of the other PJTF members.--Mktsay123 (talk) 12:05, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that we should add Bianca, but we should keep Annabeth. She's a main supporting character throughout the series. I also don't see why the prose tag is up there. Where are the lists? (besides the list of awards... every article on the PJ books has them) Airplaneman talk 19:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't do the prose tag thing, dunno why it's there... Ok, so keep Annabeth, add Bianca, and remove Nico???--Mktsay123 (talk) 15:09, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good :). Sorry if it sounded  like I was blaming you for the prose tag, which I wasn't... I was just wondering why it's there, as I see nothing wrong with the article. The only list is the list of awards. I'll go ahead and remove the tag. Oh, and I really think we can mention Nico in Bianca's summary, but yea, I think he doesn't warrant his own subsection. Airplaneman talk 19:26, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Extremepro is the one that placed the tag. I asked  for a reason on his talk, but he hasn't had time to reply yet. PrincessofLlyr (talk) 20:54, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm currently discussing it with him on his talk. Airplaneman talk 08:01, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: . No action on behalf of the tag needed. See link in above post. We only need to fix up the character list now. Airplaneman talk 05:12, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

text: Ok, I changed Nico into Bianca, and edited the information provided. Please check and edit it for me, just in case it's not complete. Thanks. --Mktsay123 (talk) 12:10, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Characters

message: I think that the Awards section would better as a subsection under Critical Reception. Would that make sense? Derild4921☼ 17:41, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and done. Airplaneman  ✈ 22:23, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion
Talk:The Transcendence of the Ego

message: This articel uses what I believe are philosophical jargon to exlain concepts. The explaination could be made simpler, for people without prior knowledge of these terms. Terms are used that are not explained, here's an example: 
'It was also Sartre's view, that differed from Husserl's, that 'intentional objects' are consciousness, and that the value of intended stuffs was in consciousness of them. 'Intentional objects' are therefore both objects of consciousness and consciousness ...'
--Uroojshaikh 10:40, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dorian Leigh

message: I have broken the over-long body of text - which was previously one much-too-long swath of text under the heading "Biography" - into at least two parts: (adding) "Modeling career". I do not have the time currently to edit the main body as I believe it is in dire need of heavy editing. Please feel free in the meantime to do so. I will come back at some point in time to contribute to said task.Romanmosaic (talk) 15:30, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing required 

message: I eve Lisa Fonssagrives was the first supermodel, not Dorian Leigh. ask123 (talk) 16:37, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the first 

message: Suzy Parker and Dorian Leigh were possible sources of inspiration for the character Holly Golightly.
see http://thelicentiate.blogspot.com/2011_02_01_archive.html?m=1
--Design (talk) 06:32, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Holly Golightly

message: Greetings Wikipedians! 12 of the 28 inline citations are to her autobiography. Rather on relying so heavily on her version of her own story, this article would benefit greatly from support from more secondary sources. Cordially, BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 15:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more citations to secondary sources
Talk:The Trial of Henry Kissinger

message: Why are documented facts presented as "alleged" in the article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.217.56.106 (talk) 20:49, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Because to be war crimes you need additional reliable sources saying that they were, not an allegation in a single book. Has he been convicted or even tried at the Hague? Has the UN issued a statement? Is there a warrant for his arrest? It is controversial at best, and you can read about it briefly in his article. MartinezMD (talk) 01:10, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: So the problem is in classifying his crimes as "war crimes". I agree. However, the fact that he hasn't been arrested, convicted or tried, although he knowingly supported other people's war crimes and now walks freely with no blood on his hands, doesn't make him innocent. 161.53.99.55 (talk) 11:40, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a matter of legal definition, no? And that's what brought up in the book, and why it's an allegation.MartinezMD (talk) 18:10, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  https://repository.law.miami.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2938&context=umlr or http://www.thecrimson.com/article/1973/3/22/court-declares-vietnam-war-illegal-indochina/ or thousands of other sources, just read them 95.91.210.192 (talk) 12:20, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Alleged" war crimes? 

message: The summary is horrifically vague. It doesnt say what the book claims Kissinger did, only that Kissinger was involved in conspiracies and assassinations. 2600:1012:B122:F4B7:24:1F4E:B25C:C41E (talk) 09:55, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Did He Say, Barebones Summary
Talk:The Trouble with Physics

message: I have read this book and it seems to me that the final sentence in this stub is inaccurate: Smolin does not suggest that science has entered a postmodern age in which a unified theory may be scientifically unknowable, and it is not his objective to call into question the limits of scientific knowledge.  Instead, he is critical of physical theories that do not lend themselves to experimental verification, and emphasizes that alternative theories, with direct experimental implications, should be given more attention.  Whether or not you agree with his views, I think that the current description of his book is inaccurrate and should be corrected.
KleinGordon (talk) 04:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Wondering what happened to the intro. Now it looks like a note in a libary catalogue and not such a hook into the rest of the article. It reads like: this book is a book; rather than: this box is notable because... (don't see the reason here, so anyone mind if it revert it? )  Just saying, Julia Rossi (talk) 02:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro

message: More and more experts feel that Smolin is right. LHC shows not sign of SUSY or strings, but these theories are not yet dead.
Maybe Green, Witten and others will stop overselling string theory and tell the truth. It is a highly speculative
theory and nobody knows if it get anything right.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicceg (talk • contribs) 19:17, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Later development 

message: I am constantly being told that an edit I've made is inadmissible because the source quoted is a blog.  Why therefore is something included here based on Moti's blog (http://motls.blogspot.com/2004/10/lee-smolin-trouble-with-physics-review.html)?  This is something self-published, not something published in a RS.  I personally have no problem with this reference being cited; it is the blanket use of the 'no blogs' principle elsewhere, to block a PoV that someone doesn't want to appear in an article, that I find objectionable. --Brian Josephson (talk) 09:37, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moti's blog 
Talk:Ajax Delgado

message: Here's a (very slight) verification: http://www.inc.gob.ni/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=3&extmode=view&extid=169&recurdate=1315279425 -- it mentions his death (including the date), and that he was a student activist.
The existance of the gym and police station seem to be verifiable. 
I can find some print sources on Google Books that seem to verify aspects of the article:
Nicaragua en Revolución by Bridget Aldaraca ; De Sandino al triunfo de la revolución by Lucrecia Lozano and others. We still need someone to go through these sources (and others) and fully verify the contents of the article. JesseW, the juggling janitor 04:05, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification