lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bertrand's theorem

message: --Guerinsylvie (talk) 10:45, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: V(\mathbf{r}) = \frac{-k}{r^2},?
LDCorey (talk) 04:50, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-perturbative demonstration

message: It is well known that power potentials with n > 3 do have a stable, circular (therefore closed) orbit, thus invalidating the "necessary condition" written in the derivation that "Here we show that stable, exactly closed orbits can be produced only with an inverse-square force or radial harmonic oscillator potential."
In my opinion, what is lacking is that all orbits are like so for those potentials, whereas the circular orbit is the outlier for the other powers.
I am making that correction in the article but would appreciate feedback anyways. Bcpicao (talk) 18:26, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closed orbits vs Stable orbits
Talk:Muwashshah

message: Which is correct, موشٌح ,موّشــح, or موشح? Badagnani (talk) 08:27, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: When it says "up to three azwan are used," does it mean "awzan" (plural of wazn)? Badagnani (talk) 01:46, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Azwan/awzan 
Talk:Blood Red Sandman

message: The article mentions that the song could be refrancing Freddy Kruger in the general song, but the lyrics:  The called me the leather apron, the callled me smiling Jack, are more akin to jack the ripper, as the leather apron was another of jack the ripper's nicknames.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cranium metallus (talk • contribs) 22:08, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freddy or Jack? 

message: I've noticed a lot of similarities between the video for "Blood Red Sandman" and the second Evil Dead film.  Is this worth mention on the page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.33.211.29 (talk) 05:29, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It will be worth a mention if we can get a source to back it up (rather than just using the video and film in question as sources - that's not allowed. By the way, nice one for spotting the similarity - Mr. Lordi did that as a tribute to the film, so it's aimed at the few people who notice it, knowing most people won't. Hehe, check the user id of who's replying to you, too... Blood Red Sandman (Talk)  (Contribs) 11:25, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I pretty much figured that linking to the video wouldn't be a good solution.  Not a frequent contributor here, so I thought I'd put something in the discussion page before smearing YouTube links all over the place.  I'll see if I can't find an intervew with Mr. Lordi that mentions this later on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.33.211.29 (talk) 11:06, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

text: It would appear that someone along the way decided to put those mentions in without any sourcing. I'll remove the references out until such time as it can be sourced. Nashville strigoi 14:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evil Dead Similarity 
Talk:Nakasi

message: The link to a Japanese article goes to "Nagashi" but this article is "Nakashi". Which one is correct?
If the English name is correct, the reading over in the Japanese article should be updated to be correct.
If the Japanese name is correct, the title of the English article should be renamed.
58.173.133.147 (talk) 08:27, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency / correctness of links
Talk:Blue Bayou

message: It's unfair to Orbison to state that Linda Rondstadt 'made the song popular'. It was already popular. True, her cover version was a hit, but its not like the song wasn't already well known and liked. I've edited the text to reflect this. --TomFriend08 (talk) 07:30, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

message: Anything to say about the message behind the song that could explain its popularity? Valetude (talk) 14:27, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of song? 

message: I gave a bit of additional info on Ronstadt's Spanish version, which was pretty extensively promoted apparently, even though it wasn't included on the Simple Dreams album. What I couldn't indicate is whether it charted anywhere. 70.73.90.119 (talk) 15:11, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ronstadt Spanish version
Talk:New Prog

message: Why put Marillion on here?  Marillion has been around since the 80s, and basically is neo-prog.  I'm deleting it. Splent 21:51, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't really compared 80s Marillion to 00s Marillion, but presumably their sound has changed due to the front man changing or something. LupusCanis 08:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Marillion's sound certainly did change from archetypal neo-prog when Fish fronted the band to something different under Steve Hogarth. Their current sound has some similarities, to my ears, to New Prog, but I think the article should have some citations making that link explicit if they are to be mentioned. Bondegezou 10:41, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marillion? 

message: I just finished reading the citations. If this article is to have any kind of credibility the citations require revision. Not only are there more "citation needed" tags than actual citations, the citations are about as blunt as a baseball bat. The articles only vaguely refer to "new prog" and some only refer to _new_ prog i.e. prog which is new. The Muse citation for instance points out that Muse reviles being referred to as new prog - not the opposite. The Mew article doesn't even refer to new prog. Something needs to be done in the name of credibility. Terppa 21:39, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Anything that's had a "citation needed" tag for a while with no citation forthcoming can certainly be culled from the article. Bondegezou 22:51, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: Isn't Showbiz Nu Prog? --Stefán Örvarr Sigmundsson 05:20, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muse
Talk:Hamilton's principle

message: This should be merged with Principle of least action. JRSpriggs 03:53, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: yes. F = q(E+v×B) ⇄ ∑ici 15:16, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: THIS IS ABOUT TO BE MERGED WITH Principle of least action. PLEASE DO NOT EDIT YET. F = q(E+v×B) ⇄ ∑ici 15:53, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. F = q(E+v×B) ⇄ ∑ici 18:25, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I object against this hasty merge. Hamilton's principle is one form of the principle of least action. Maupertuis' principle is another (and older) one. -- Crowsnest (talk) 20:44, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

text: I will revert back to the old version. See also here. Apologies for this... F = q(E+v×B) ⇄ ∑ici 19:16, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  I can't see what is the difference with the Principle of least action. If there's a difference , it isn't pointed out in the article. If there isn't, it should be merged Esponenziale (talk) 23:40, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

text:  Updated Link to the referenced discussion on WikiProject Physics from 2012. I cannot find anything that would explain the alleged difference between the two principles. In fact, the articles seem to describe the same thing. Theowoll (talk) 22:30, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Blue Is the Colour (song)

message: Two things; I could be wrong but this has to be copyright (only recorded about 1972); and I think you'll find the line is "sing loud and clear till the day is done". (It was half my record collection at one time so heavy rotation isn't the word). Britmax 19:28, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Blue Monday (1954 song)

message: This source gives a peak of only number 9 for three weeks in February 1957. But the article says "peaking at number five" and gives the source as Whitburn (2004). Which is correct? Martinevans123 (talk) 22:14, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart position 

message: Herb Hardesty's baritone sax solo has been sourced to this reference: "Davis, Hank (1993). Fats Domino: Out of New Orleans. Bear Family Records. p. 42." But the only source with that title, that I can find online, is here and it's from Record Collector No 172, December 1993. p.122. and it's by Andy Davis not Hank. So I've added a second source (The New York Times) which is available online. Over at the Herbert Hardesty  artcile there is a full quote from the same alleged Davies source. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:49, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Herbert Hardesty]] solo 

message: The article states:   "Blue Monday" is a song written by Dave Bartholomew, first recorded in 1953 by Smiley Lewis and issued as a single, in January 1954  .... It was later popularized in a recording by Fats Domino in 1956".  My emphasis.  So, why does the page title say "1955 song"?   Ghmyrtle (talk) 16:24, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. SilkTork (talk) 20:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank heavens. SilkTork, you've got to get your rest, 'Cause Monday is a mess! Martinevans123 (talk) 20:17, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title
Talk:New Zealand reggae

message: I have decided to adopt this article and am currently attempting a total rewrite here on behalf of the Music genres task force and in support of WikiProject Reggae and WikiProject New Zealand.
If anybody has any suggestions, constructive criticism or can point me in the direction of potentially useful and reliable sources they would be welcome. ThurstenEgorGreene (talk) 13:26, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Adoption
Talk:Blues in the Night

message: Who performed the song in the film? (Whilst I want to know, for my CD collection database, please add answers to these questions to the article, as they're quite vital info). --kingboyk 23:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  So, whose version counts as original? 

message: I remember in the cartoon Bugs Bunny Gets the Boid an instance after Bugs pretends to surrender and let Beaky Buzzard capture him after he gets tidied up, he then sung a variant of the song with words that were a less-than-subtle slap at the slow-witted buzzard. Also, earlier in the scene, Beaky sung a version with the words "Bring home somethin' for dinner" replacing the original 2nd line.  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 16:07, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looney Tune usage 

message: I would have thought Big Joe Turner's version from 1942 would be among the notables, but then, I am steeped in the blues so maybe some bias there. His version certainly counts as a blues classic and is found on countless compilations.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevensims (talk • contribs) 06:03, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joe Turner 1942, is this not notable?
Talk:Bodies (Sex Pistols song)

message: The edit by Joie de Vivre had a number of things wrong with it.  Firstly, if we have to use "pro-choice" rather than "pro-abortion," then we have to use "pro-life" instead of "anti-abortion," according to NPOV.  Secondly, the article doesn't make sense if it says that Lydon isn't pro-choice but believes that the choice must be the mother's, since this is the very definition of being pro-choice.  If someone wants to tease out the language to be more NPOV/PC, go ahead, but please keep it accurate.  Finally, just because John Lydon of the 21st century is pro-choice doesn't mean that that's how he and his bandmates viewed things in writing the song decades ago.  Lydon may condemn those who believe the song is against abortion, but it takes a lot of tortured interpretation to look at the lyrics of the song and think of the song as being pro-choice.  Calbaer 23:12, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough.  Joie de Vivre 23:20, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Joie de Vivre edit

message: Or should that be attitude NAZIs?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.49.229.107 (talk) 09:25, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That you, John? If not, good impersonation.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.102.149.115 (talk) 15:03, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gosh darn Karma Police 

message: Lydon is not on the record claiming that it is a pro-choice song.  In an interview with VH1 he said that it is neither strictly pro-life nor strictly pro-choice, but that its message is to "think about it", and apply rationality to the issue instead of a knee-jerk response either way.  This should be addressed on the page, which right now shows clear liberal bias.--Kshymanik (talk) 04:05, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe the message is there is no message. It's just a song about an abortion, not pro or against abortion. Having an abortion is not a pleasant experience for anyone. But sometimes it's the only thing you can do. John Lydon is not pro or against abortion, he just describes it as it is, period. 81.53.227.59 (talk) 19:36, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pro-Choice? 

message: "In 2000, John Lydon went on the record as pro-choice[3], supporting the choice of a 13 year old French girl to use the morning after pill without her parents' knowledge." From what I can read in the article, the story of 13 years old French girl did not happen for real, it's just an example. "If you're a 13 yo girl, you can...". 81.53.227.59 (talk) 19:39, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example 

message: The song is about the disturbing behaviour of a person (Pauline) in a state of diminished responsibility.  Being pro or anti abortion doesn't come into it.  It was Pauline's gory stories and waving around of foetuses which motivated Lydon to write the song.  Faesces are pretty gross and some mentally ill people like to parade their stools around, but a song about that would not amount to a song opposed to going to the bathroom.62.190.148.115 (talk) 11:00, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's about Pauline
Talk:Marianne du 14 Juillet series

message: :Image:Marianneluquettvprf.jpg is one the stamps from the series the article is about. Sebjarod 17:54, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Body Talk (Ratt song)

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 05:22, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: I really don't think you can describe this song as Speed Metal  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.180.120.127 (talk) 12:18, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Speed Metal?
Talk:Nuevo tango

message: I agree with the comment below. The article is poorly writen. confuses people and instead of describing tango nuevo, the writer spends time talking about the criticism towards tango nuevo. It contradicts itself, it states that tango nuevo is not a form of dance, but a form of analysis of the movement and form of instruction, and then it adds photos of specific tango nuevo figures, lists music groups as tango nuevo, that being incorrect as a music style and analysis of the movements are unrelated. Nobody needs electronic tango to dance in a tango nuevo style.
Collaboration with other people more informed in the subject is necessary to make this article informative.
98.247.209.223 (talk) 06:18, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Elden Auker

message: Auker died in Vero Beach, Fla., where he had lived since 1974.
::Yes.  Auker was a regular at meetings of the Central Florida chapter of the Society for American Baseball Research.  Although ninety years old, he was a great story teller. WHPratt (talk) 20:33, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Among other things, Auker spoke of the closing cerermony at Tiger Stadium.  After Elden's stirring speech that charged athletes with providing good examples for youth, a later-generation Tiger star got arrested on the spot for unpaid child support.  See the Ron LeFlore article. WHPratt (talk) 12:33, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Some comments
Talk:Ondo (music)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved as uncontroversial. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 02:26, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Ondō →  – long vowel is exceedingly uncommon; for example, the 明鏡国語辞典 dictionary records only おんど without the short vowel. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ondō&action=history. Fish bowl (talk) 01:21, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 April 2022
Talk:Oom-pah

message: I've just added something to this artical but I don't no how to add refrences etc. PLease could someone add some please. 77.99.14.179 (talk) 16:47, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have heard a cellist, returned to the US after ten years in an Austrian chamber orchestra, use "um-chung" to refer to this type of ostinato. __Just plain Bill (talk) 20:18, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate name
Talk:Bonnie George Campbell

message: The lyrics are in the public domain, as they have have been published in several books before 1914 . Phil Bridger (talk) 17:05, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright and Wikisource 

message: There seems to be some variation in some of the lines. http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=Www_AAAAIBAJ&sjid=OE4MAAAAIBAJ&pg=1639,6005677&dq=bonnie-george-campbell&hl=en In this 1930s newspaper they are fairly different. What is the date of the version of the text used in the article? RafikiSykes (talk) 17:24, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Variation
Talk:Pagode

message: The sentence about "lesser" forms of music appears highly POV, but I don't feel adept enough to rewrite it at present.   Just wanted to mark it so someone who feels up to the task can do so. - PhilipR (talk) 19:55, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have adjusted the text. - Al Lemos (talk) 21:12, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  pov-check
Talk:Boogie with Stu

message: If I recall correctly, Ian Stewart was present for this song because the band employed him also for "Rock and Roll" on IV.  I'm not sure, so I'll let someone else add that to the article.
:: Yes, indeed. Both were recorded between Dec 1970 and Feb1971. Other stuff: The acoustic guitar could also have been played by John Paul Jones. I really don't hear any bass guitar (verified trhough personal spectral anylysis) sound (just of the bass drum and acoustic guitar). So my personnel section would be:
*Robert Plant - vocals, handclaps + laugh at the end
*Jimmy Page - mandolin  + laugh at the end
*John Paul Jones - acoustic guitar
*John Bonham - drums
*Ian Stewart - piano
In addition : which guitar synth? I thought they were intotruced in 1977 (see: guitar synthesizer). The sound is of the mandolin, the acoustic guitar and the reverb. Saemikneu (talk) 12:12, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recorded at the same time as "Rock and Roll" 

message: Whether or not a particular song was "heavily influenced" by another is a matter of subjective opinion that can not be stated using Wikipedia's "voice".  If the statement is to appear in the article, it must couched in language such as "Writing in his [NAME OF BOOK], {NAME OF PERSON] opined that the song was "heavily influenced" by ... ".  That's what is meant by in-text attribution and that is what is needed here.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:42, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering the song was the subject of successful legal action, I'm not so sure that this is a subjective opinion as it is a legal argument with considerable merit.  Nonetheless I'll ruin the continuity of the sentence to address your concerns  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.29.97.165 (talk) 23:51, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Heavily influenced"
Talk:Boogie Wonderland

message: This phrasing is confusing. What does it mean? Was the song written for the EWF singer's cousins? Then why was it recorded by EWF? Or, grammatically possible but less likely, was the song written for the lead singer among EWF's cousins? Can a band even have cousins? Martin Rundkvist (talk) 06:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "written for the lead singer of Earth, Wind, & Fire's cousins" 
Talk:Merengue típico

message: If Merengue cibaeño is another term for Perico ripiao, shouldn't it redirect here? - AKeen 15:41, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I merged the two - AKeen 18:12, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Yes, but which one is more widley known? I would have said it was the former title.  Asteriontalk 10:20, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a good point. Perhaps there should be a discussion as to what should be the main page name for this article, and what should be the redirect pages. Merengue típico gets more Google hits than Perico Ripiao. Any others have ideas? - AKeen 16:26, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Boom Bang-a-Bang

message: Has no reputable source ever commented on the similarity with "Goodness Gracious Me", written nine years earlier by David Lee and Herbert Kretzmer? Martinevans123 (talk) 21:52, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big Sellers 

message: Why? ‘The gulf war’ is no explanation. More info needed. 2A00:23C7:E287:1901:B8E3:471F:AD98:D6EC (talk) 17:55, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Banned