Talk:Climate of Antarctica

message: Three year old talk page archived, but I'm sure it's wrong. Fxmastermind (talk) 16:37, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. . dave souza, talk 20:28, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

text: I moved the archive page to a more typical naming ("Archive 1" instead of just "archive") and added an archivebox template above. --RL0919 (talk) 22:48, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Archived

message: Just to confirm, Forbes isn't a good source for NASA data, much better to refer to World of Change: Antarctic Sea Ice : Feature Articles or NASA Visible Earth: 2015 Antarctic Sea Ice Extent. Another option is NSIDC Sea Ice Index, but these don't explain the relationship to the Arctic or some common myths. Worth having a look in AR5 4. Observations: Cryosphere and using that to update this article. . . dave souza, talk 20:28, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sea ice extent

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Climate of Antarctica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dna.gov.ar/la-antártida
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081229065611/http://www.ess.washington.edu/web/ess/people/faculty_bio/steig-bio.html to http://www.ess.washington.edu/web/ess/people/faculty_bio/steig-bio.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Climate of Antarctica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100616025722/http://wmo.asu.edu/world-lowest-temperature to http://wmo.asu.edu/world-lowest-temperature
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080507070713/http://www.aari.aq/data/data.asp?lang=0&station=6 to http://www.aari.aq/data/data.asp?lang=0&station=6
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150115054010/http://antarcticanz.govt.nz/images/downloads/publications/FieldHandbookA6Aug12.pdf to http://antarcticanz.govt.nz/images/downloads/publications/FieldHandbookA6Aug12.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:56, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I just removed a couple of sentences concerning the absence of dry ice deposition in Antarctica. As written they were incoherent; they were written in the form of a reply to a question asked in an archived post on this talk page and made little sense without that context. The reference supporting the removed sentences was also incorrect; it referred to the main Antarctica article, but the supporting information was in a post in Talk:Antarctica/Archive 2.
I considered rewriting, but discussing why carbon dioxide doesn't condense into dry ice under the conditions prevailing in Antarctica seems to be a significant diversion from the description of the climate of Antarctica, and it would have necessitated a further restructuring to avoid orphaning the sentence describing the location at which the lowest temperature was recorded, which seems to me to be much more relevant.
Darrell Tangman (talk) 18:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: After looking at that content (which I missed when it was added), I support your action. Now, if someone is aware of a reliable source that explains specifically why carbon dioxide does not precipitate at that location when the temperature is very low, than I could see the information being put in an explanatory footnote. - Donald Albury 21:18, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor content cleanup 

message: There's no data on annual snowfall. Glaciers come from snow so snowfall is important. Antartica's high mountains are like Greenland's snow making machine. 2603:7000:4EF0:9B0:C99:6F55:A836:2E58 (talk) 21:09, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article should have a section about SNOWFALL 

message: @Cyclopia While Antarctica could definitely be classified as a desert, that all depends on your definition, and that makes inclusion in the lede problematic. Most climate classifications classify deserts by PET and not precipitation alone and preclude the possibility of polar deserts by category if not by numbers, and often both (see e.g Köppen climate classification). Other definitions (see desert) often distinguish between 'true' deserts and polar deserts (as does the polar desert page), or simply require deserts to have PET higher than precipitation. The usage of 'cold desert' to refer to Antarctica, while common in colloquial speech, is also avoided in technical settings as that properly refers to something else. My opinion is therefore that "desert" should not go unqualified in the lede, if included. Uness232 (talk) 13:33, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have reliable sources discussing this that can be used for the article, then I'm very happy to take them into account. cyclopiaspeak! 14:28, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antarctica as desert