Talk:Bully (video game)

message: There's two "Settings" under Plot? The Development section could use an expansion. There's also not a Release section. The GAN reviewers will tell you of any other issues and they give you time to fix them as well as suggestions. --JDC808 ♫ 19:23, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've taken care of everything except the release section.  What sort of information that isn't already covered by the article would be included in the section? McJEFF (talk) 06:14, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: I saw this listed on WP:GAN. There's a pretty major concern with sourcing. The Gameplay section, the Characters section, and the Development section all have no references at all. This issue was raised in the 2006 peer review but it looks like it still hasn't been addressed. There are a lot of sources, but it really needs someone to go through and map the sources to the assertions made in the unreferenced sections. Without said citations, certainly the gameplay section borders on original research, and it is a requirement of the GA criteria (specifically 2c) that articles shouldn't contain OR. Hope that helps. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:40, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-GA review 

message: Please do not add the text that states Bully II/2 is in development or announced, if so please include a reliable source. The game is not confirmed nor in development. So if you'r going to add a text stating Bully II is in development or announced, please include a source. The following is a considered a source: Rockstar Games, GAMESCON, GameStop or other Video Game Retailers, IGN, SWEGTA. The following is NOT considered a source: Youtube (unless the channel is Rockstar or the following considerable sources), Other websites. --Big Brudda (talk) 20:47, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  October 2015 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bully (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060820151153/http://www.gamespot.com:80/news/6155892.html to http://www.gamespot.com/news/6155892.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061016190418/http://www.gamespot.com/news/6159812.html to http://www.gamespot.com/news/6159812.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:42, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I don't understand why this IP insists that the Scholarship Edition is a remake and not a remaster. They don't appear to have any sources to back it up. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) 20:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Only a port with higher-res textures, not a remake whatsoever. Just warn the IP for every wrong edit it does and report them after their fifth. Lordtobi (✉) 20:37, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remaster or Remake? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Bully (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121107111243/http://www.1up.com/features/bully-afterthoughts to http://www.1up.com/features/bully-afterthoughts
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061116131021/http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3154456 to http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3154456
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131224130448/http://www.1up.com/reviews/bully-scholarship-edition_2 to http://www.1up.com/reviews/bully-scholarship-edition_2
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131225023045/http://www.1up.com/reviews/bully-se to http://www.1up.com/reviews/bully-se
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131224140518/http://www.1up.com/reviews/bully-scholarship-edition to http://www.1up.com/reviews/bully-scholarship-edition
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081023222202/http://www.gameplasma.com/reviews.php?do=view&id=416 to http://www.gameplasma.com/reviews.php?do=view&id=416
*Added  tag to http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3170883&p=1
*Added  tag to http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/bullyscholarshipedition/review.html?part=rss&tag=gs_all_games&subj=6200387
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110529052035/http://thegamingliberty.com/index.php/2009/11/10/tgl-exclusive-interview-reveals-possible-bully-sequel to http://thegamingliberty.com/index.php/2009/11/10/tgl-exclusive-interview-reveals-possible-bully-sequel/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121019122040/http://www.1up.com/do/feature?pager.offset=1&cId=3155813 to http://www.1up.com/do/feature?pager.offset=1&cId=3155813
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:31, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Is there any source for the release dates listed here?
All I can find indicates that Canis Canem Edit was released on the 27th of October in Europe, and I can't find anything about Australia. SimonBestia (talk) 18:31, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release Dates source?