lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Walter Chalmers

message: This page should not be deleted because it forms part of a series:  
T. Wheatley 1867-1874, Dugald Drummond 1875-1882, Matthew Holmes 1882-1903,William P. Reid 1903-1919, W. Chalmers 1919-1922. Biscuittin (talk) 09:04, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that this article should not be considered in isolation.  Are Chief Mechanical Engineers of pre-grouping British railways (as a class) notable or not?  I would argue that they are notable and that stub articles about them should remain, so that people have the opportunity to expand them. Biscuittin (talk) 11:25, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but the way to et this firmly established is to expand them at least a little yourself. You should summarize the information from your source a little. Are there any published non-web sources on this railroad--you will want to add them also. the practice here, good or bad, is that incomplete articles that do not themselves demonstrate notability clearly enough tend to get deleted, you it would be a very good idea to actually say something more than this. DGG (talk) 23:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion
Talk:Temporal Key Integrity Protocol

message: The article sort of implies WEP-TKIP is breakable - the article needs to state how bad it is.  Tempshill (talk) 05:56, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How weak is it? 

message: Just FYI... the text of part of this article looks to be word for word identical to:
http://www.networkworld.com/reviews/2004/1004wirelesstkip.html?page=1  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.16.222.122 (talk) 21:33, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like that was added by an IP User 98.207.235.138. I'm restoring most of what was there before, and redoing the rest. In fact, the text that was replaced is not as good as the previous text. For instance, WEPs problem was not its keylength (at least not in 104/128 mode), but rather its key scheduling (so to speak).LH (talk) 05:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 

message: I've expanded and updated the Security section in response to the Beck-Tews attack. If my description/explanation of the attack is incorrect, please correct it accordingly, and provide additional information here on the talk page. LH (talk) 05:15, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New TKIP attacks 

message: The attack by Toshihiro Ohigashi and Masakatu Morii has no public implementation. The authors never seem to have proven it actually works. One of the few tools available to attack TKIP, which is the tkiptun-ng tool of the aircrack-ng toolsuite, has no mention of this attack. This is contrast with the other practical TKIP attacks mentioned on the page (those all have an implementation). Unless someone objects, I wouldn't consider this an attack on TKIP, in particular as it only claims to be a minor improvement anyway.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thenetsec (talk • contribs) 23:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ohigashi-Morii Attack
Talk:Drown in My Own Tears

message: I was uncomfortable with it being classified as a blues song so wrote to my expert on the subject.  I got back, "I wouldn't quibble with "bluesy" but I would vote against "blues." and then the clincher, "For god's sake, it has a bridge and a diminished chord."  Is that enough? Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 16:56, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  I just removed "[[Blues music|blues]] " from the lede
Talk:Moll's gland

message: I would like to suggest that ciliary glands be redirected here.
Any thoughts?
The ciliary glands are the glands of Zeis, not Moll. They are sebaceous and secrete into the hair follicle of the eyelash.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.210.250.55 (talk) 12:33, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Walter Aronsson

message: Sources differ as to the spelling of the name: The Swedish SOC source has Aronson while the other source has Aronsson.  Both spellings are common in Swedish, see Aronson and Aronsson. Maybe we have to come up with more sources, especially Swedish ones, to be sure what the correct splling is but the situation now can't persist, namely to have an article title Aronsson while the article text spells it Aronson. Either the text has to be corrected or the article has to be moved. --Proofreader (talk) 16:23, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Category talk:Deck arch bridges

message: How can a Stone Arch Bridge be described as a bridge where the deck is carried above the arch.
Show me a Stone Arch Bridge where the deck is carried below the arch. Early stone arch bridges had the deck, roadway or railroad suppport integrated into the structure with no separate deck structure visible.Gregorydavid 04:43, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am refering to the categorisation of the Jade Belt Bridge in this instance.Gregorydavid 04:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition of Deck Arch Bridge
Talk:Harlequin cabbage bug

message: Hello! I will be making a significant edit to this page. Thank you.
- Sticksect
Hey all, I suggest migrating this page to "Harlequin bug" rather than "Harlequin cabbage bug," as that is the offical common name recognized by the entomological society of americahttps://www.entsoc.org/common-names?title=&field_scientific_name_value=murgantia+histrionica&tid=&tid_1=&tid_2=&tid_3=&tid_4=, BugGuide https://bugguide.net/node/view/557. Does anyone have objections to this? plcoffey (talk) 17:13, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Melona

message: Can someone edit this so it makes sense? I can't even tell what it's supposed to mean. If you don't speak English stop editing the damn page.  "intended to cover the domestic market with green color"
Just so you know people, Melona bars aren't popsicles. They are ice cream in a shape of a bar, otherwise known as Creamsicles. I got experience because I love this stuff and I eat 'em =) . Jaewonnie (talk) 22:24, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: My edit to note that it was available in Canada was initially deleted. If there is something needed to keep this edit, please say and I'll try to accommodate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Digimer (talk • contribs) 04:12, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian Availability
Talk:Logarithmic mean temperature difference

message: 2021 April, please check this alternative (causal) LMTD heat exchanger formula Introducing the analytical causal closed-form LMTD
Just added a quick derivation of LMTD as a distraction from study. Maybe someone can make a quick diagram up and fix any errors in the formulas (maybe fleshing bits out that I neglected).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.239.133.247 (talk) 12:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Derivation of LMTD 

message: There are mistakes in "assumptions and limitations" in this article "A particular case where the LMTD is not applicable are condensers and reboilers" & "It has also been assumed that the heat transfer coefficient (U) is constant, and not a function of temperature"- are both incorrect.  Somebody needs to read the original research paper by Colburn where LMTDs are introduced (
Colburn, I.P; Mean Temperature Difference and Heat Transfer Coefficient in Liquid Heat Exchangers. Ind. Eng. Chem., 1933, 25 (8), pp 873–877)
and summarise amongst other things the assumptions, to quote Colburn:
"Assumptions: 
(1) The over-all heat transfer coefficient, U, is a linear function of temperature t; i. e., U = a (1 + bt),
where a and b are constants, and t is the temperature of one of the fluid streams. The specific heats are constant, and heat losses
are negligible.
(2) The derivation is limited to the following cases: (a) Two heat transfer mediums in countercurrent flow are changing in temperature in such a way that the decrease in sensible heat of one is equal to the increase in sensible heat of the other; or 
(b) One heat transfer medium is at a constant temperature, such as a condensing vapor or boiling liquid, and the other is changing in sensible heat as indicated by a temperature rise or fall"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.95.54.63 (talk) 08:36, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assumptions and Limitations 

message: I miss the See also section. Specifically, I'd like to see the NTU method being mentioned at least somewhere in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hummeling (talk • contribs) 12:18, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also section
Talk:Walter P. McConaughy

message: When did he join the State Department?  Are his private papers available somewhere in the U.S.?  Googling the term "oral history walter mcconaughy" nets some fruitful results.  Much work still needed on this piece.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Liushaoqi (talk • contribs) 07:36, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work required
Talk:Boyzilian

message: This page serves absolutely no purpose. All it does is rehash the exact thing it says in the Brazilian waxing article. I think it should be deleted.
Superslacker87 04:59, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll redirect per WP:BOLD.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 13:39, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the point?
Talk:AVM Productions

message: Hi, ive created the infobox for the AVM Productions. Seems like this wiki page is really stub. Pls help to maintain the wikipage with more infos. --killerserv 05:02, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Created Infobox

message: sorry about the table, its the best one i could find. Xxxsacheinxxx (talk) 17:29, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  table 

message: The Tamil and Telugu film Ramu (film) is also the AVM Product. But is it released in 1966 or 1968. According to IMDb, it is 1966 film.http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1463199/ Can someone clarify and add to the list.Dr. Rajasekhar A. 04:18, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ramu film
Talk:Waltrip brothers

message: Cyberknights 
https://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?Search_Arg=cyberknights&Search_Code=TALL&PID=eyYFKVnCQU73s1LOEPAubANMElgCe&SEQ=20240521203628&CNT=25&HIST=1
https://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?v1=2&ti=1,2&Search%5FArg=cyberknights&Search%5FCode=TALL&CNT=25&PID=QdH7KEIoCVnfATXedI5DPX0Ld5-G1&SEQ=20240521203641&SID=1
https://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?v1=1&ti=1,1&Search%5FArg=cyberknights&Search%5FCode=TALL&CNT=25&PID=QdH7KEIoCVnfATXedI5DPX0Ld5-G1&SEQ=20240521203641&SID=1
This comic book was one of two comic book series that James Emrey Barnes had worked on with artists in the late 1980. 
It was through the contact with Eternity Comics and Imperial Comics for the publishing of Dark Comics (with John Bridges) that Emrey tried to get a contact for the publishing of Cyberknigts. This was how Eternity Comics learned about John and Jason Waltrip.
The deal fell through on Dark Comics after a dispute with the publisher wanting to combine Dark Comics with a funny animal comic into single issues. Two issues of Dark Comics were completed. One was published.
At this time, the first issue of Cyberknights had been sent to Imperial Comics to try to get the publishing deal for that book, but it was rejected (most likely because they didn't want a writer and needed artists for the Robotech comic book on the Eternity Comics side).
Two issues of Cyberknights were created. They were combined into one issue that was independently published and holds the copyrights listed above.
WereTech (talk) 00:46, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Keystone Centre

message: I'm reverting the image, the new image seems to showcase a bunch of vehicles and a parking lot more then it does the actual facility. I'm all for a new image for this page but this current one is not up to standards.Krazytea (talk) 20:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Lone Pine International

message: I need to fix a problem with the scores in 1975.  It indicates 10 rounds (although an even number of rounds is unusual for a Swiss), but many of the scores add up to 9.  Also, the lede says the tournaments were from 7 to 11 rounds, but the info on the individual tournaments indicates 7, 9, or 10 rounds.  Also, the Further reading section includes Louis D. Stratham International Chess Tournament, Lone Pine, California, March 29-April 8, 1981 with Statham's name spelled wrong.  If the typo was actually in the title of the published book (this seems unlikely) it should stay, otherwise it should be fixed. Quale 22:45, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stuff to fix 

message: I think it would be better to take the date range out of the section titles and put them in a column of the table or the text of each section.  Leave just the years in the section title.  Any opinions?  Bubba73 (You talkin' to me?), 03:10, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds fine to me. Quale (talk) 23:03, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Do you have a preference for putting the dates in the table or in the text? Bubba73 (You talkin' to me?), 03:30, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates
Talk:Warren Angus Ferris

message: I removed the following information from the page. It wasn't cited, and it looks like a conversation best left on a talk page. 
:"As payment for his surveying services, Ferris was granted the land upon which now lies most of downtown Dallas.  At his death, no family members came forward to claim this land and it was then reclaimed by local government. Several of his descendants, many still in Texas, have attempted to regain legal possession of this valuable land, but all attempts have failed. This is inaccurate,  at his death his children were run off the land and it was claimed by the state. Several attempts have been made to reclaim the land but we have been told there are no records to prove we ever owned it. - a descendant" Amgisseman(BYU) (talk) 16:39, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed paragraph from "a descendant"

message: This article seems full of errors with regards to Ferris' activities in Dallas. See http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/ffe11. At the time of his death, he owed debts to the Caruths and their general store and his debts were settled from his land holdings. The land was never reclaimed by the government. Ferris had acquired the certificates for the land through his work, but law prevented him from claiming the land in his own name. He put the surveys in the pseudonym of his half-brother, C.A. (Joshua) Lovejoy, with whom his relationship soured. Because he feared attempts by Lovejoy to claim the land, he put it all in the name of his wife or children. His wife predeceased him and her will stipulated that the land not be distributed for five years and only to the children who remained on the farm for that time. Ferris did not lay out the streets, merely the land surveys which, when later subdivided, established the alignment of the roads. I understand that this information needs to be put into the article, but in lieu of having time to properly edit the article, I am mentioning it here and will come back in the near future to revise.208.180.241.48 (talk) 22:30, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Substantial Errors
Talk:Patriarch (Latter Day Saints)

message: I don't see a need for two articles "Patriarch (Latter Day Saints)" and "Patriarch emeritus".  In a since, the Patriarch emeritus is just a retired Patriarch.  We don't include a separate article for "emeritus Seventies".
If you put the entire Patriarch emeritus article as a subsection in this page it will improve the Patriarch (Latter Day Saints)]] article and remove a LDS stub.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 15:28, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it; the Patriarch emeritus article is unlikely to get any bigger than it already is, and you're right that it's useful material in Patriarch (Latter Day Saints). -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different Merge proposal 

message: I think this page's focus is all wrong.  When reading it, both the LDS Church and Community of Christ Sections focus almost exclusively on the office of Presiding Patriarch and Presiding Evangelist respectively.  These are distinctly different, albeit related, position from "Patriarch" and "Evangelist" in both sects.  After reading this page, it almost seems like a re-hash of Presiding Patriarch.
In the LDS Church Patriarch considered to be an office of the Melchizedek priesthood. These Patriarch are married high priest who are normally at least 55 years old.  There are normally one or two in every Stake. They are responsible for patriarchal blessings.
An evangelist in the Community of Christ ordained office of the ministry.   The primary duty of an evangelist is the giving of sacramental "evangelist's blessings"; it is for this reason that evangelists are often referred to as "ministers of blessing".  These blessings were considered one of the eight sacraments in the RLDS Church.  While I do not understand what that exatly mean, it sounds alot like a patriarchal blessing
Additionally, and to add to the confusion, other sects, such as the Bickertonites have Evangelists/Patriarchs also, and since this page seems to focus on the Presiding Patriarchs/Evangelist, it fails to make mention on any other sects such as this.
I think that page need to be refocused away from the Presiding Patriarch's and to the General office of Patriarch.--- ARTEST4ECHO (talk) 18:56, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I was WP:Bold and just did it.  However, if anyone object, I'm more than happy to change it back.--- ARTEST4ECHO (talk) 20:16, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think this page's focus is wrong 

message: The RLDS is mentioned with a beginning date 1872, and "Patriarch/Evangelist" in that same community from 1835. How would that be possible?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.91.216.198 (talk) 17:01, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem of date in the paragraph "Patriarch in the Community of Christ"
Talk:Mellow Yellow (song)

message: It's not about a dildo? According to John Basset McCleary in The Hippie Dictionary: A Cultural Encyclopedia of the 1960s and 1970s, ISBN 1580085474, Donovan later revealed that the subject of the song was an electric dildo.  Dlabtot 05:42, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  meaning of title
Talk:Tillamook County Transportation District

message: All articles need to meet notability requirments, and for this type of article it needs to be WP:CORP as that covers organizations. Two sources that are not independent of the subject do not demonstrate notability. Try finding newspaper articles from The Oregonian or the local Tillamook paper or other reliable sources. Aboutmovies 03:02, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Currently not notable
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-09-10/Jimbo interview

message: I'm afraid that interview was too short. IIRC, Jimbo had to step into a shower so I don't think he meant to end it prematurely. Will he schedule another one soon? --70.179.175.240 05:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He did have to take a shower, but I believe he had a dinner guest coming in when he left, so as far as I know, he wasn't planning on coming back after that.  I'd be interested in doing more interviews with Jimbo and other important Wikimedia figures, but at this point there aren't any plans to do more interviews.  Ral315 » 16:29, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Hey,
just for the record, Mabel is not Princess of the Netherlands, but princess of Oranje-Nassau :) (Or Orange-Nassau, if that is localized).  effeietsanders 18:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mabel
Category talk:Defunct courts

message: If a court existed in the past and was then reorganized, essentially being reconstituted into a different court, is it considered defunct for purposes of this category? My view is yes. For example, I have added to this category Court of Appeal in Chancery and Federal Court of Canada. --Mathew5000 06:08, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope of this category?
Talk:Krasnochetaysky District

message: The population is mainly concentrated into two uphill areas in the west and east. There is a forest belt covering the west bank of Sura River and then turning toward eastern direction. The forest separates also the two main population areas in the area.
There are following settlements and villages:
From north toward south. From west toward east.
Western upland area: Pandikovskoje (less than 100 inhabitants), Loba (less than 100 inhabitants), Motshei, Ispuhany, Uromovo, Kumarkino, Hvadykasy, Kark-Sirmy, Zhukino, Torhany, Pitishevo, Mizherkasy, Koshkildino, Pandikovo, Osinovo, Hirlukasy, Bolshoi Atmeni, Malyi Atmeni, Alikovo, Motshkobashi, Sholja, Lipovka 1, Aktshikasy, Jamashi, Kalugino, Bajmashkino, Shumshebashi, Tomlej, Izhekej, Tsherepanovo, Krasnyje Tshetai (adminstrational center), Jangildino, Piterkino, Kubjashi, Ptshelka, Vishjenery, Horabyr, Tarabaj, Sosnovo, Togarishi, Shopovo, Atnary, Lipovka 2, Sormovo, Beresovka, Tsheremushki, Krasnyi Jar, Kishlja.
Eastern upland area: Verhnyi Akkesino, Kuznetshnaja, Aktashi, Sankino, Vtoryje Horshebashi, Horshebashi, Atai, Novyi Atai, Tsherbaj, Koshlaushi, Jamaly. Hozankino, Jagunkino, Staryi Atai, Russkije Atai, Kjurlevo, Lesnaja, Shtanashi, Obykjevo, Arankasy, Vyla, Gorbatovka.
In the western upland area only Tsherepanovo, Krasnyje Tshetai, and Piterkino which all three have been merged in practice into same band settlement, have more than 1.000 inhabitants each. In the eastern upland area only three villages, namely Verhnyi Akkesino, Atai, and Shtanashi have each more than 500 inhabitants. All other villages have less than 500 inhabitants.  
Could anyone provide Chuvasian names?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.112.189.41 (talk • contribs) 
:This list is quite outdated, not grouped by rural/urban settlements, and the names are not romanized in accordance to WP:RUS.  If anyone needs a complete and current list, please let me know.  I don't have the Chuvash names, unfortunately.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:57, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Krasnotshetajskij Rajon
Talk:Pentahedron

message: a pentahedron is a shape that has five sides and is formed by a pentagon 
a penthedron is one of the hardest shapes to draw and it is scenitificly proven that it is has 26 sides not 25
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.192.50 (talk) 06:24, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I beg to differ. According to MathWorld, the only regular polyhedron that can be formed by pentagons is a dodecahedron, which has 12 sides. The point is, a polygon with five regular flat sides is impossible, at least in our dimension or whatever. I emphasise "flat" because it's possible to have a sphere cut into 5 identical faces, but they're not flat. HУтaяtalk2mecontribs 18:10, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments
Talk:Củ Chi district

message: Need etymology. Badagnani (talk) 03:50, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology