Talk:T-84

message: How many have been built? If anyone knows, please add it to the article (YoungRoger 00:34, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: How many have been built?

message: Who's messing with the modern tanks thing at the bottom, why rearrange it? And if you feel like you need to please label your catigories accordingly. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Counterstrike69 (talk • contribs) 03:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  modern tanks  

message: There is blatantly contradictory and potentially incorrect information in the section titled Development of the T-84-120. The article claims that 120mm gun of T-84-120 can fire AT-11 Sniper missile designed for 125mm gun. The AT-11 Sniper article itself says the missile was designed for 125mm gun. Also, the source is very suspect and cites a user post on the War Thunder Forum  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baljeet931 (talk • contribs) 15:14, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development of the T-84-120 

message: Does anyone have infos about how many tanks the GAF wants to buy in total or if they plan to replace their whole amount of T-72s with T-84s ?
There is no info at all about GAF wanting to buy T-84s, other than an allegation by Konovaliuk, which was dismissed by Minister of Industrial Policy. Ceriy (talk) 05:58, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  In service of the GAF 

message: So, what does Oplot mean? A few sources state that it's Stronghold but I can't find anything definitive, and it doesn't seem that oplot translates solely and directly into stronghold. Official name, wan-fank, or what? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 18:27, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's official name. Oplot mean stronghold.--Юе Артеміс (talk) 06:19, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oplot 

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.army-technology.com/news/newsrussia-t90s-battle-tank-peruvian-army
*:Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
*http://www.army-technology.com/projects/oplot-m-main-battle-tank-ukraine/
*:Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 12:51, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on T-84. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091129023958/http://photopribor.ck.ua:80/en/products/defense/btt/pnk-6/ to http://photopribor.ck.ua/en/products/defense/btt/pnk-6/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:29, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: 10 tanks were delivered by beginning of 2016.[19][20]
For 5 years, all was done in less than 15. Order 49. Actually all T84 is cut from the corpses of T80, to build one of several pieces. And it confirms Google.
http://vz.ru/world/2016/4/29/807986.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.162.80.47 (talk) 15:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ukraine de facto can not produce tanks 

message: Hey all, bit new to editing for wikipedia so I'm gonna leave this in talk for a bit but I wanted to make something clear. It's a misconception that the T-84 'Oplot' and its derivatives including the Oplot-M and Oplot-T feature a bustle mounted autoloader. The new Autoloader design was only ever present on the T-84-120 Yatagan prototype, as a ready rack separated from the crew via a blowout box was a requirement for NATO standardization, and this required a redesign of the autoloader.
As for sourcing, there's an image on this website that clearly shows an Oplot-M turret with the conventional Carousel autoloader inherited from the T-80. (Use page translation here)
http://btvt.info/1inservice/bm_oplot.htm
http://btvt.info/1inservice/bm_oplot.files/mz2.JPG
http://btvt.info/1inservice/bm_oplot.files/mz1.JPG.
Furthermore, an official 3D rendering of the Oplot-M from UkroBoronProm shows a carousel autoloader during a transparent "look-through" of the tank (youtube link /zhPZOU_iS1E?t=63). Several official sources also claim a "ready rack" (read: how many rounds are stored in the autoloader) of 28 rounds of ammunition, identical to conventional T-80s. The Yatagan meanwhile only had a ready rack of 22.
Given that that original claim in the article is unsourced, it seems clear to me that this was a case of misinformation, I believe it's a problem of miscommunication as the Oplot turret does feature a blowout ammo storage compartment in the turret bustle, in a similar concept to the T-90M, but this is not a change to the autoloader. http://btvt.info/1inservice/bm_oplot.files/image014.jpg http://btvt.info/1inservice/bm_oplot.files/bunker2.jpg BlowoutPanel (talk) 09:47, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  T-84 'Oplot' Autoloader