lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:South African Football Association

message: Sure ukuba uzondi phathela the day before the opportunity and I will send the opportunity to meet with the opportunity to work in the opportunity of t I will send it to the day of the opportunity of a TEE I love it to you and I will be able to meet with the opportunity to work in a y to meet with the money is going to work in the day before and after that we are looking to work on it but I am not sure if it is going well with your company and 41.114.212.62 (talk) 20:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Our
Talk:Spanish football league system

message: A user keeps reverting and editing the page to change the format of the page to copy the Spanish version of the page leaving many parts in Spanish rather than in English, which is different from the consensus style used across every national league system on English wikipedia. For example, Italian football league system, French football league system, English football league system, etc. I am creating this section to provide an opportunity for the user to comment on why they believe this style is preferred, as Wikipedia convention is to discuss proposed changes that have differing opinions on a Talk page first. I previously left a message on their talk page where a response was not provided. RedPatchBoy (talk) 17:06, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table format change
Talk:Gunvor Galtung Haavik

message: The article currently lists the arrest date as two and a half months after this person's death.
Can someone fix this? I don't know the correct dates, so I cannot. --hack 00:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed - BsL 20:16, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date problems
Talk:Ex-premies

message: I have removed the redirect and added a short text as the Prem Rawat article does not explain the term 'ex-premies'.--John Brauns 00:22, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Jossi, could you explain why you want this article redirected to Prem Rawat when the Prem Rawat article makes no mention of ex-premies? If my text is faulty in some way, then please feel free to correct it.--John Brauns 08:56, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I would argue that this term "ex-premie" is a non-notable term about which there are no reliable sources in this context. OTOH, "ex-premie" is a widely used term in Pediatrics. I have redirected it to the disambiguation page Premie. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 02:07, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a sensible resolution, thanks.--John Brauns 12:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Turks and Caicos Islands Football Association

message: The article MFL League has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
:A search for references found no published (gBooks) support for the content of this article. Fails W:N and WP:V. Both other language articles are also unreferenced.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist.  The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 17:47, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[MFL League]]
Template talk:Philadelphia Phillies roster

message: I rearranged the layout here to make it more appealing, and as such sacrificed the three extended roster players category (and put the DL players in their respective positions). Maybe next year the September call-ups can be added back, but I think for now it should stay as the most likely approximation of the 25 man roster. JesseRafe 00:24, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  removal of extended roster players 

message: He was traded to Philly.-DANO- (talk) 21:58, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No h was not - he did not clear waivers. JustSomeRandomGuy32 (talk) 02:50, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fabio Castro 

message: Isn't Brett Myers on the DL now because of his hip? --151.205.222.28 (talk) 18:04, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brett Myers 

message: Recently called up Jesus Sanchez is a catcher, not a pitcher  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinrocke (talk • contribs) 21:29, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jesus Sanchez 

message: I'm not sure what precisely is going on, but Kendrick is definitely back on the roster and pitching today. I guess he's up replacing Moyer, who's on the DL?  The roster at MLB.com doesn't yet reflect this, but there's plenty of stuff saying Kendrick is pitching today.  Thoughts? john k (talk) 19:22, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kendrick
Talk:Armenian dress

message: No notice was placed here that this image has been nominated for deletion. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 23:08, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Other images used on this page may also have been nominated -- please check them all by clicking on them to see if there is a deletion notification on the image page.  If there is, use the link that takes you to "this image's entry" to comment on the nomination for deletion. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 01:20, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image nominated for deletion
Talk:Triumph in the Skies

message: Interesting thing, the acronym for this is the funniest ever in the TVB drama list. GamePlayer623 00:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What happened to the table with extended information about the cast? --Enfresdezh 11:06, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast
Talk:Mercedes-Benz M110 engine

message: I wonder if anyone knows if there actually was an engine M110 with KE-jetronic. There was a lambda sensor in the later models in 126 and 123, but it seems like this system is called K-Jetronic With Lambda.
Robijn 00:42, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

message: The M110.988 was also used in the 280E and 280CE W123 models, but I'm not sure of the exact dates of use so I haven't added anything. CiaranG 11:57, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing info
Talk:Phelps and Gorham Purchase

message: Among the first settlers of this area was my ancestor, John Burnett who moved to the area with his brother-in-law Lodewick Vandermark, his brother Patrick Burnett and a friend who fought with him in the Revolutionary War, Charles Hamilton. If anyone has any information on these gentlemen, please contact me. I am doing research to write a book. 68.48.233.151 00:43, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal note

message: The four related articles (Holland Purchase | Morris Reserve | The Mill Yard Tract | The Triangle Tract) are each small articles that contain much of the same information found in this article, and it's unlikely anything substantial will be added to them. Combined with this existing article, the four articles will comprise a substantive description of the purchase. AltSkitMan (talk) 23:40, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal 

message: From the article:
:For this preemptive right, they paid Massachusetts $1,000,000 (£300,000) (equivalent to about $ billion today) or 16 and 2/3 cents an acre ($41.18/km²).
:which translates to "For this preemptive right, they paid Massachusetts $1,000,000 (£300,000) (equivalent to about $ billion today) or 16 and 2/3 cents an acre ($41.18/km²)."
I think something is off with this template.  It translates to $26 billion(US), I think $26 million(US) would be more like it.  GenQuest "Talk to Me" 15:29, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Conversion error?

message: In New York, the state and federal government were dealing with identified peoples - the Five Nations of the Iroquois Confederacy: Mohawk, Onondaga, Oneida, Cayuga and Seneca, joined by the Tuscarora in 1722. These were well known; let's at least use Iroquois, or the specific nation names, such as Mohawk, Cayuga, etc. when referring to transactions related to them, rather than the generic "Native American." All the colonists knew of their claims to the lands in this region. In addition, I recommend that the article at least briefly point to issues related to 20th century land claims by these peoples, as New York state did not have the authority to treaty with them and did not get Senate ratification for some of the land deals.Parkwells (talk) 16:28, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Use term "Iroquois" or nation names
Talk:Hiroyuki Tomita

message: I will be attempting to insert a picture within the next couple of days.  If I fail, one should be added. ...GIROLLE...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Girolle (talk • contribs) 08:13, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A picture and information.

message: I've changed the quality rating on this article to class=C today, because there's a significant amount of text that is unreferenced.  In particular, the section "2004-2008" has no footnotes at all.  PKT(alk) 21:50, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality rating
Talk:Forbes Smiley

message: I found this entry to be extremely well written.Wiki-wiki-tiki 00:50, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The phrase 'it has inspired dialog on' needs a citation (and possibly rephrasing) Jackiespeel (talk) 11:29, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Talk:John Ritchie (abolitionist)

message: Shrimplin 01:03, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Jigme Wangchuck

message: The recent edits are refreshing in that someone is bothering to edit, but unfortunately are a giant, unwikipedic mess. We need to add material properly with citations, not infodump. And we cannot use honorifics like "His Majesty" when referring to the subject. Ogress smash! 05:07, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Your last edits: added A GIANT SECTION HEADER ALL IN CAPS; replaced the Dzongkha with identical Dzongkha text; and broke a wikilink to House of Wangchuck because you felt like it should be called "Wangchuck dynasty". These are not good edits for the page. Please check the manual of style if you are unfamiliar. Ogress smash! 06:41, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: Origin trace of second king of Bhutan 118.103.138.110 (talk) 11:04, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: About 2nd king 119.2.125.164 (talk) 14:29, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History about 2nd king 

message: about second king 119.2.125.164 (talk) 14:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Finite volume method

message: The finite volume method looks similar to the finite element method.
In both cases, the integral by a subdomain is approximated by a mean value...
: There are differences too; they are two completely different methods A.N. Yzelman 09:41, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Looks to me like there is a sign error in equations (4), (5), and (6). Someone should verify, but it appears that when df/dx was moved to the right hand side, it was not turned negative.
Think about it, for the amount of rho at time two to be greater than at time one, you need a net decreasing flux to the right (df/dx must be negative). Thus for the integral in equation (4) to be valid, it must be subtracted from the initial amount of rho.
The same correction is needed with (5), and with (6) either the sign on the flux integrals should be swapped, or the indexes can be.  When the equation was re-arranged in (7), correct sign convention appears to be in order again.
If this is the case and I'm not just going nuts about nothing, someone with equation-editing know-how ought to give it a quick adjust. --LANMasta (talk) 23:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Equation Error 

message: I would modify the subject "General hyperbolic problem" into "General conservation law". In fact, the form of equation there reported is the general form of a conservation law, which need not be always hyperbolic. For instance, Navier-Stokes equation without external forcing term have that same general form, but they're parabolic instead of hyperbolic. Waiting for agreement by previous authors.  Giorgio.bornia (talk) 15:45, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section heading 

message: To me the proof seems wrong from equation (6) to equation (7). While the proof describes that (7) is obtained from (6) by differentiating (6) with respect to time, what is needed instead is
1. Divide the equation by Δt,
2. Assume t_2 = t_1 + Δt,
3. Let Δt -> 0, and assume t_1 is a general time t.
Can someone confirm this? Schimmel-chip (talk) 08:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example: derivation of FVM
Talk:List of prime ministers of Bhutan

message: I don't get the numbering on this page. Why are some primer ministers with numbers between parenthesis?--Aréat (talk) 07:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Entries with tags ′Acting Prime Minister′ and ′Chief Advisor′ are in 'em dash'. The ones who are elected first time are only numbered in bold. Twice or more time elects are assigned their actual first numbers in parentheses. Elect-entries belonging to a party are assigned colors. --Gpkp (u • t • c) 17:23, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. --Aréat (talk) 17:43, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbers 
Talk:Reciprocal polynomial

message: In texts I'm reading, p*(x), is called the "Reciprocal polynomial" of p(x), and not the ' palindromic ' or "conjugately palindromic" case. Anyone sure about the actual naming?
Oyd11 01:13, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, after chking MathWorld -  and several online articles (and my textbook), p* - is the reciprocal, while the case p=p* I found as 'self-reciprocial' (which does make sense). Oyd11 21:16, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  name 

message: I think an interesting property that should be written is that:
(pq)* = p*q*
and, as a corollary, that a polynomial with integer coefficients is irreducible if and oly if its reciprocal is.
--Edriv 11:54, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiplicative isomorphism 

message: I'm not quite happy with the paragraph on minimal polynomial.  A field of definition needs to be mentioned, and if not specified I presume the rationals.  But if it means minimal polynomial of an algebraic number over the rationals, then p will automatically have real coefficients.  Richard Pinch (talk) 06:27, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minimal polynomial 

message: I believe that Palindromic polynomial should be merged into a section of this article. While working on improving that page it became clear to me that any extension would require talking about reciprocal polynomials and everything on that page is really a consequence of properties of reciprocal polynomials. There is also a high likelihood that there is a considerable amount of OR on that page which could easily be removed in a merge. This merge had been discussed on the Math Project talk page in 2012 (Sept), but nothing was done at that time (even with consensus). Bill Cherowitzo  (talk) 02:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Je Khenpo

message: Hhhh 119.2.125.176 (talk) 14:40, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yonten thaye
Talk:İmam bayıldı

message: I like the recipe section, but I'm afraid it might be out of place at Wikipedia. Should it stay or go? IrisWings 01:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recipe

message: This seems like the source to me (since it is pretty much the same stuff, in a more condensed style):
http://www.cliffordawright.com/recipes/imam_bayildi.html
- Kvetch 01:44, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: I believe this dish is also prepared and enjoyed by Armenians.  Is this correct?  Badagnani 05:30, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is correct, and they, too, call it by its Turkish name. Of course, this doesn't in any way take away from its status as an item of Turkish cuisine. It just means that Armenians (at least those whose roots are in places which were in the Ottoman Empire) enjoy it, too. Americans may enjoy Bratwurst, but it's still a German dish. No doubt many eastern Mediterranean peoples know and enjoy İmam bayıldı. Xenophon777 21:52, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armenian cuisine as well? 

message: The text seems for the most part a slightly modified cut-and-paste from the link given above. I have blanked the offending material, but have not deleted it. --Dumarest 19:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that the material I made not visible, as copyright violation, has been restored, with another source. But the text is the same as it was, and if it was in fact copied from the link suggested, it is still a copyright violation. I have reverted to the previous unless the material can be referred to and the text in the article NOT be a cut-and-paste from another copyrighted article. --Dumarest 17:21, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation?
Talk:Wangchuck dynasty

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 18:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Wangchuck family →  – Per official sites:  and the Centre for Bhutan Studies. See also:
"Wangchuck Dynasty: The hereditary monarchy of Bhutan was established in 1907"
"To secure the Wangchuck Dynasty, however, should the Druk Gyalpo be dethroned"
"Although he did nothing to undermine the retention of the Wangchuck dynasty, the Druk Gyalpo"
"the fourth king in the Wangchuck dynasty , came to power in 1972"
"story of the rise and triumph of the Wangchuck dynasty"
"The modern history of Bhutan starts with setting up of the Wangchuck dynasty". DrKay (talk) 17:31, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 December 2021
Talk:Van Helsing (video game)

message: I think the article should be Van Helsing (video game) to keep with the pattern of other articles' names. Padishar 01:27, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change 

message: I am going to start by fleshing out the story. I am still up in the air about keeping all the various tables at the bottom, some dont really seem to have much reference to subject, possibly other than creators, still dont need to be in this specific article, imo.Sheabutter98 (talk) 08:32, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sprucing up
Talk:Single-level store

message: mmap call which is used for memory-mapped files works this way. Is this really the same principle?
Yes and no. All files are accessed via the data channel management, which optimally determines if the file should be fully buffered into RAM, accessed by the disk i/o controllers, or a combination of the two. This management of data resources is global, not by application or user, and dynamically being balanced continuously.
: In most 'ordinary' systems (e.g. all variants of Unix), there is 'process memory/address space', which is really a very different kind of memory from files. Files (or portions of them) can be mapped into that address space, but the two are fundamentally different kinds of things. In SLS systems, there are no separate 'files' and 'process memory'; there are only segments, and a process' address space consists entirely of a collection of segments. Noel (talk) 16:32, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this memory-mapped I/O? 

message: How exactly is this distinguished from the (today) standard paged virtual memory system, as seen from a user process viewpoint? --ssd (talk) 04:12, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: See answer above; usually the segmentation is visible to the user code (e.g. pointers are two parts, a segment number and an offset within the segment, with a fixed boundary between them). Obviously, with a large enough single-space address spave (e.g. 64 bits) one could simulate segmentation, but up until now most systems that implemented SLS had hardware support for it, with two-part addresses. Noel (talk) 16:32, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  paged virtual memory system?
Talk:Affari tuoi

message: This article should mention the mathematics "professor" who appears on each show.   Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 02:05, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The professor 
Talk:Sikorsky Russky Vityaz

message: According to the Igor Sikorsky page, he made the first test flight on 13 May 1913, not 10 May. But then that page also has a photograph that shows him in the aircraft in 1915, whereas this page says the aircraft was destroyed in June of 1913
72.39.62.16 (talk) 16:10, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dating of test flights
File talk:Desinsertion du muscle CO.jpg

message: Ok everyone, that picture isn't that bad, just an eye. And let's just all hope that his vision is for the best. I think the picture looks pretty cool perosnally. Nicole —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.48.192.32 (talk) 15:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Bad 

message: the is absolutely amazing! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.211.91.140 (talk) 21:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outstanding Picture 

message: there are words here that i don't understand.
This was a featured photo... that is how i found it.  
what is Castroviejo?  Manson-Aebli?  Cook?
Sign your username: Newtowiki2 (talk) 22:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Castroviejo ??
Talk:Sud Aviation Vautour

message: 09:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: BION, Britain wasn't considered part of Europe until as late as 1973 when Britain joined the EEC. Before that 'Europe' didn't mean Britain.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.100.255 (talk) 19:39, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't one point out that this is basically an upscaled copy of the venerable Messerschmidt ME-262?--Cancun771 (talk) 08:33, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm assuming you have reliable, verifiable sources to prove this, and have not based this soley on looks. - BillCJ (talk) 08:38, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Design

message: Does Gunston's book really say that SNCASO adapted their SO.4000 design into the Vatour, or is the inline ref just for the date? The 4000 did have swept wings and two engines, though the latter were at the wing roots. It looks very different and was bigger and heavier and no mention is made of the Vatour on its page. Can someone check, please?TSRL (talk) 17:09, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  SO.4000 adapted? 
Talk:Sukhoi Su-9

message: The specifications state that the maximum speed is "2,120 km/h (1,320 mph, 1,140 kn) / M1.73 at 13,000 m". This implies that Mach 1=1225, which is correct at sea level. However, at 13,000 m, it is around 1064 km/h. If the speed in km/h is correct, then the mach number should be 1.99. If the speed in mach number is correct, then the km/h should be 1840 km/h. Unfortunately, I do not have references to confirm either.
Diego bf109 (talk) 01:46, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect speed
Talk:Supermarine Attacker

message: On the third of two dives, the outer portion of the starboard wing folded up and the ailerons became locked. 
Third of two? Is it third of three, second of two, or is this some Britishism I've never before encountered?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.245.118.188 (talk) 07:22, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No it is just wrong, the George Medal citation doesnt say how many dives so unless somebody has a reliable reference it can be removed.  MilborneOne (talk) 22:58, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two or three flights? 