Talk:Salford Quays

message: The Golden Tulip is no longer part of the Quays group partnership. The parnership has a website (http://www.thequays.org.uk/) which I feel would be a useful addition to this article.
The Golden Tulip is back in the Quays group marketing partnership - I know as I'm a member of that group.
:1) Whoever you are, sign your comments by appending a string of four tildes ~ 
Thanks - but I don't need your advice on signing my comments.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.0.93.134 (talk) 22:57, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 2) Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy on conflicts of interest. --Orange Mike 14:22, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Golden Tulip 

message: The article as it currently stands deals with the Quays in it's modern redeveloped form... wouldn't it be appropriate to include it's origins (the huge engineering task), history (as an inland port), disuse (its deterioration and disuse following economic changes), and then finally it's modern status?
I'm sure it would be! The Quays aren't just a shopping complex built ten years ago! Jhamez84 11:29, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely - Be bold. -- Solipsist 12:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Having looked back (that was my previous account), I was intending somebody else to do this as I do not know the area! Jza84 22:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Definitely - this article is missing a lot. I don't have a lot of time, but know the area quite well and plan on updating some of the content to better reflect it as soon as I can. As I see it, it's missing history, information on most of the major landmarks and any references to the residential developments. Guess it can be my first wikipedia project... ;o) Roobarb! 23:47, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More 

message: I've noticed that in this article, the docks previously on the site of Salford Quays are referred to as 'Salford Docks', which I don't think is correct. If you look at maps and photographs from the time, particularly ones of the main dock entrance, they are quite clearly labelled 'Manchester Docks'.
For example, see this post.
Does anyone have any problem with this being corrected? Roobarb! (talk) 12:13, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems fine to me. It was, after all, called the Port of Manchester, not the Port of Salford. --Malleus Fatuorum 11:08, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Lovely - I'll tweak this when I next get chance; the Salford Docks article could probably also do with some tweaking. Strangely, the Port of Salford is actually coming into existence now... Roobarb! (talk) 19:30, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salford Docks vs Manchester Docks 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Salford Quays. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090327122642/http://www.salford.gov.uk/milestones_v2.pdf to http://www.salford.gov.uk/milestones_v2.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120314005144/http://www.salford.gov.uk/wsc-water.htm to http://www.salford.gov.uk/wsc-water.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080608021117/http://www.thelowry.com/aboutthelowry/default.html to http://www.thelowry.com/aboutthelowry/default.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111011110722/http://salford.gov.uk/mediacityuk.htm to http://www.salford.gov.uk/mediacityuk.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928105321/http://www.broadwaymalyan.com/projects/architecture/residential/nv-buildings-manchester.cfm to http://www.broadwaymalyan.com/projects/architecture/residential/nv-buildings-manchester.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:42, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified