Talk:Savannah (actress)

message: The reverter gave this rationale: "No tangible improvement, please discuss on Talk if any edits are significant". Obviously, s/he didn't recognize the need for improvements I'd made to the grammar/mechanics/references/readability. Moreover, not sure why that person feels so proprietary about the page.  I can see reverting changes that detract from an article or that add unreferenced information.  But in this case, the person misused the power of reversion. - Froid (talk) 04:38, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: For the most part you edits were inconsequential and not any significant improvement. You made minor grammar changes (calling them "Major copy edits" in the edit summary, an abuse in and of itself) and added no content. You also messed up some coding in one of the sections that I just fixed along with several references. Thank you for your interest in the subject and the article, but your changes are so minor, I'm not going to bother to revert them. Regards, --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 05:28, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: One, your nasty tone reflects the very reason why Wikipedia's editorial culture is criticized. I suggest trying on a more civil, professional one. Secondly, I can't believe you're happy to live with grammatical errors (as your post indicates you are).  Thirdly, I've set up my account so I'm alerted if I break any formatting so I can fix it.  Fourthly, you don't own the article -- no one does: not its originator, and not any of the editors.  Accordingly, you might want to reevaluate your proprietary stance toward the article. Froid (talk) 15:44, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Since this communication is written, the only "nastiness" involved is what you have created in your mind. So I suggest that you take your own advice. I invite you to fix actual grammatical errors where ever you find them, but also ask that you to remember that this is an encyclopedia and not a tabloid. By the way, I am a member of the Pornography Project. If you are interested in articles like this, you are welcome to join the project and be part of a group effort. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 18:43, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Undid reversion

message: An RfC which may affect this article's title is currently taking place (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pornography#RfC: Should a person who has appeared in exclusively pornographic films be described as "(actor/-tress)" or "(pornographic actor/-tress)"?). Rebecca1990 (talk) 07:39, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  (actress)/(pornographic actress) RfC 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Savannah (actress). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://avnawards.avn.com/past/winners/1992
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:31, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified