lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Aga Khan III

message: The weighing up in gold of Aga Khan III in Bombay would be an interesting (if admittedly somewhat trivial) addition lacking in this article. MadMaxDog 11:49, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In Aga Khan II Muhammad Shah's mother is described as the third wife of Aga Khan II, not the second.  I don't know which one is right. Jvv62 16:25, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  his mother 

message: "Sir Sultan Mahomed Shah, Aga Khan III" is all in bold. Compare Aga Khan IV:
:Shah Karim al-Husayni (; born 13 December 1936), known by the religious title Mawlānā Hazar Imam by his Ismaili followers and elsewhere as Aga Khan IV
How to parse the string of boldtext?
* Sir — honorific for British knighthood?
* Sultan — Sultan (name)? Sultan (title)?
* Mahomed — given name ?
* Shah — Shah (surname)? Shah (title)?
* Aga Khan — title for the office of Qasimi Imām
* III — ordinal as Aga Khan, not as Qasimi Imām or as Mahomed 
Perhaps Indian name has relevant information re given name, surname, patronymic, etc. jnestorius(talk) 22:09, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Aga Khan II

message: Here are some suggestions on how this article could be improved:
;Lead
* 2-3 sentences should be added summarizing the main points of the rest of the article (see WP:LEAD for more info)
:* Added a few more sentences to the lead - Erdling 08:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Added information about the context of his family - Erdling 08:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

text: * Added information about the ancestry of his parents - Erdling 08:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

text: * Good suggestion...done! - Erdling 08:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

text: * Added more detail about his work - Erdling 08:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

text: * Added a bit more information about the impact of his work - Erdling 08:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

text: * Good suggestion...done! - Erdling 08:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

text: * Good suggestion....added a bit more information about context - Erdling 08:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

text: * Added a bit more information about her - Erdling 08:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

text: * Added a bit of information about how he is remembered - Erdling 09:36, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

text: * Added a few details to tie the section to previous ones - Erdling 09:36, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

text: * Added a bit more information about the mausoleum - Erdling 08:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

text: * Good suggestion....done! - Erdling 08:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks for all of your suggestions....they were very helpful indeed! :) - Erdling 08:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cimm's suggestions for this article (2007-05-09) 

message: In Aga Khan III Muhammad Shah's mother is described as the second wife of Aga Khan II, not the third.  I don't know which one is right. Jvv62 16:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing this out Jvv62. The Aga Khan III article has been corrected. Multiple credible sources agree that his mother was the third wife of Aga Khan II. Cimm[talk] 19:24, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  conflict with Aga Khan III bio 

message: The marriages and children section seems to contradict itself. We are told that the Aga Khan's first two sons died as adults but later that they both died in infancy. Which is correct, or have I misread the section? Tigerboy1966  21:05, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  First two sons 
Talk:Sha'ban

message: Per MOS-Ar. Because of the strict transliteration as seen on the AH page (Sha‘bān), the preferred standard transliteration should be Sha`ban. Additionally, googling "Sha'aban" and "Sha`ban", results in 155k and 389k hits respectively, favouring the latter spelling. I also know that in Indonesian/Malay, the month's name is pronounced in two syllables (i.e. Sha`ban, although written Syaban/Sya'ban); not sure about the Arab way, but I assume it's the same, considering the strict transliteration. My point is: the second "a" has to go. - HyperGaruda (talk) 10:10, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The Islamic month names on WP should be based (as far as possible) on those given in the main page dealing with the Islamic calendar. AstroLynx (talk) 12:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  - HyperGaruda (talk) 19:47, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

text: I notice that navbox  has "Sha'ban", but infobox  has "Sha'aban".  Pelagic (talk) 15:54, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I know. The Sha'aban/Sha`ban issue was the reason for discussing the straight apostrophe vs grave accent on MOSAR. After a revert of my initial move to Sha`ban, I did not dare to make further adjustments until the conventions were updated. - HyperGaruda (talk) 16:39, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to Sha`ban 

message: This is currently the only Hijri month page that's missing the template. It's useful for navigation and should be consistent with other pages. It is a bit cluttered with both the list of months and infobox, so perhaps the list of months could be left out, keeping it similar to the Hebrew month pages, with the category template at the bottom filling its role for navigation. I would personally prefer to have the month list at the top though. Perhaps it could be arranged horizontally like in the pages for Gregorian months? That would take up less space at least. Geobica (talk) 18:16, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I would not object if a list of months template is added to the top-right, similar to that in the Hebrew month pages. An infobox, however, adds little to what is already mentioned, it takes up a disproportional amount of space and (in my opinion) just looks ugly. AstroLynx (talk) 18:52, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template
Talk:Master Chief

message: more people are looking up the character Master Chief (Halo) than Master Chief Petty Officer. As such, this page should redirect to the article on Halo's Master Chief. --jonasaurus 01:11, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  Added dab note to Master Chief (Halo), and redirected Master Chief. FWIW, I don't see the point of having a dab page for only two articles. -- Dave C.talk | Esperanza 05:45, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Halo

message: I am curious of what the policy is on redirects that both may have merit for. Although I don't know how many users are intending to get to which article, whether it be the military rank or fictional character, I would guess more are looking up the Master Chief the scifi character. Is there any way to get some data on that?
I will revert to the disambigous page which directs to both pages instead of a simple redirect since it isn't stated which article has more traffic and therefore more entitled to the redirect. I believe that is a fair compromise until some numbers can be put on it.  TheSittingDuck 23:55, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My vote is on redirect to Master Chief Petty Officer, because halo is become a has-been game, the article about the rank/title already has the game mentioned in the popular culture section. 71.116.91.80 (talk) 22:40, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree that it should stay a disambiguation page.  While Master Chief (Halo) may be more notable to us computer-savy people, it's not going to be to everyone, and it seems that Master Chief Petty Officer is also a commonly used term.  Since it's not clear, it seems that it should stay a disambiguation page. -- Natalya 12:04, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Keep the dab page.  "Master Chief" in regards to a video game is a only well-known meaning to a certain group of people (I'm not one) and there's no reason to fight over notability and primary usage - just disambiguate them. SlackerMom (talk) 13:10, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, leave it be. There's no substantial problem to solve here. --AndrewHowse (talk) 15:18, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect or Disamg? If Redirect then which?
Talk:The Age of Reason

message: This ties in with problems in the articles Natural Law and Physical law. To an educated individual of the late 18th Century, especially one versed in the ideas of the Enlightenment, the term Natural Law would refer to what we call today the Laws of Physics, rather than referring to modes of human behavior as rooted in the natural world. Meanings of phrases and words shift over time, and that needs to be made clear when discussing the viewpoints of deists and what they speak of when they use the term "natural law." PJtP (talk) 03:07, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Natural law

message: Just a note that I got on a TFA talk page ... this article starts off "English and American political activist Thomas Paine", but the Thomas Payne article starts off "English-born American political activist" (and philosopher and other things). It would be helpful if the two articles were in sync. This article will hit the Main Page for a second time on the 23rd of this month; I'll check later to see if there have been changes to the lead. - Dank (push to talk) 00:02, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI Paine never became a US citizen. Being born after the 1707 Act of Union he was a British subject, remaining-so for the rest of his life.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.18.173 (talk) 09:38, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  TFA note
Talk:COS

message: I'm moving these redlinks here for now -- jiyTalk 01:14, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
* Card Operating System (OS, ICC)
* Cassette Operating System (OS)
* Clip-On Socket (CPU)
* 
* Concurrent Operating System (OS, UNIVAC 9200, UNIVAC 9300)
* Corporation for Open Systems (org., OSI user group)
:Why? Redlinks encourage people to create! — David Remahl 02:48, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Scratched one off the list.  One every 16 years!  Let's gooooooo!--NapoliRoma (talk) 01:31, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Redlinks
Talk:2002 World Series

message: What does this less runs-more wins paradox have anything to do with baseball?  I'm not sure what point the person who added it was trying to raise.  Team sports have always been this way and I've never heard it discussed anywhere but here.
*Agreed. Reduced this section to a single sentence. --69.236.82.135 01:03, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed the "citation needed" refering to the opening line, "The 2002 World Series was one of the most memorable classics in the history of the series". The claim of memoriability is supported by the rest of the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.188.131.148 (talk) 05:06, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  no citationneeded 
Talk:.276 Pedersen

message: I've downloaded the Pedersen patent for the en-Block clip and dressed it up for insertion here.  I've also moved the technical jargon to the bottom of the article and removed the technical tag.  Sure, it's technical.  You don't go to this page unless you want that kind of stuff.  Any comments? --Asams10 01:32, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision with Patent Image

message: Asam, the .280/30 is not actually a necked down 7.62x51 NATO. The .280/30 was created independantly from the T65/7.62 NATO cartridge and the only similarity is in its base, as the .280/30 was designed to have the same rim diameter as the .30-06 (which is the same diameter as the .308). It is not a 7.62 case necked down to accept a 7mm round - that would be the 7mm Compromise. The 7mm Compromise was a last ditch attempt to convince the Americans to adopt a 7mm cartridge by the British/Canadian/Beligians and is also known as the t65/7mm. It closely resembles the 7mm-08 with a MV of about 2700-2800 FPS, whereas the .280/30 only has a MV of about 2500 FPS. It is a minor point though - great article, I learned a lot! JamesL85 08:55, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: .280/30

message: Can anyone who access to the "numerous magazine articles" listed under references please flesh that out a bit? It'd be a big help. I'll try to find some basic cartridge and reloading info. Arthurrh 00:57, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Try "Cartridges of the World" by Barnes.  It's the only one I'm aware of with reloading information (maybe?)--Asams10 03:25, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More References 

message: "Waxed" is the more proper term. That is the term used by Julian Hatcher as well as John Pedersen in his patent for 'waxed' cartridges. Read the patent here:  The term 'lubricate' is imprecise as there was more than one reason for the coating. It served four purposes: 1) lubricate the case and ease extraction 2) protect the brass, primer, and bullet from corrosion 3) seal the bullet to prevent moisture ruining the powder 4) seal the primer to prevent it becoming inert due to oils, water, sweat, etc. In its day, wax coating was derided as 'attracting dirt' however this was not true in practice.  The real reason for not desiring waxed cartridges was an unreasonable prejudice born from ignorance.  I'd cite Hatcher on this one, but it's in 'Book of the Garand' and I left that copy back in the states.  I did bring Hatcher's notebook, though, and I'll have to gander at it and find out what he said.--Asams10 11:51, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waxed vs. Lubricated ammo 

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class    dashiellx (talk) 11:07, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Rare, yeah, but "unique?"  Don't think so.  Anmccaff (talk) 21:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Unique en bloc clip?"
Talk:3,000 years ago

message: From WP:RfD:
* 3,000 years ago → 1st millennium BC
* 4,000 years ago → 2nd millennium BC
* 5,000 years ago → 3rd millennium BC
* 6,000 years ago → 4th millennium BC
* 7,000 years ago → 5th millennium BC
* 8,000 years ago → 6th millennium BC
* 9,000 years ago → 7th millennium BC
* 10,000 years ago → 8th millennium BC
* 11,000 years ago → 9th millennium BC
* 12,000 years ago → 10th millennium BC
* Pointless Wikipedia clutter, one can simply type 5,00 years ago Supadawg (talk) 16:37, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments
Talk:Genome (book)

message: What's the difference between  and ? Should the latter also be listed?  doesn't even return any results at RedLightGreen (although it does return an obscure result at Amazon with no associated picture).—Ubern00b 01:38, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: " For each nugget of science, Ridley also includes an error or misrepresentation. Some of these derive from poor scholarship: others from his political agenda."  This is meaningless because the reviewer does not give a single example to support his assertion that there are errors, and therefore it should not be quoted.
76.122.86.169 (talk) 05:17, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  They are very well supported Coyne gives several examples in his thorough review; I've added three of them to give an idea of his argument, which is well supported. As always, it is the quality of the source that supports the statement in the article, and in this case, both the author, a leading biologist, and the publication (the London Review of Books) are of the highest quality. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:16, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsupported assertion
Talk:Sawfish

message: i was just thinking why are the sawfish endangered its for a school report
: See Sawfish#Conservation. — Sebastian 09:29, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  why 

message: Is the life expectancy correct in this article?  According to this article Buzz, a sawfish, is at least 42?  Link: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/11/15/BA3U1GCFJ9.DTL&tsp=1  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.130.34.137 (talk) 07:15, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age 

message: I added a 'cleanup' tag to the article. It's not terrible by any means, but it needs some serious work here and there. It's relatively minor stuff, but distracting nonetheless. 67.249.178.169 (talk) 14:15, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing that your complaint was about grammar, I have changed the template to a more fitting. If it only is "in a few spots", I would suggest you correct it. 62.107.214.63 (talk) 04:43, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: The photo that's been used for the Smalltooth is not a smalltooth sawfish. I clicked the photo and the owner of the photo labeled it a largetooth. I made the change in one place, but the photo is elsewhere on this page. Georgia Aquarium only has largetooth and green sawfish. http://www.georgiaaquarium.org/animalguide/oceanvoyagerbuiltbythehomedepot/greensawfish.aspx I am not sure how to fix this, but wanted to point it out to someone who does know how to correct it. Thanks!
-Daniela.bc11 12:00, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that. --Epipelagic (talk) 17:59, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect Attribution

message: The article somehow omits any and all reasons why the fish belongs to rats rather than sharks. 91.223.75.139 (talk) 12:56, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lacks even BASIC information  

message: — Assignment last updated by Jrxijown (talk) 23:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP24 - Sect 201 - Thu
Talk:Douglas F4D Skyray

message: Need a date for the redesignation as F6 Leonard G. 01:51, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Maradi, Niger

message: This page links to the disambiguation page Ground nut, but I'm not sure which sense is intended.  Links to that page most often intend the sense described by peanut, but I prefer not to guess, and I am particularly cautious about African articles because the Bambara groundnut and the Hausa groundnut are African crops, quite similar to the peanut.  Can you help?  Thanks.  — Pekinensis 01:55, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shell money

message: "Used by technologically primitive groups".  I'd have to disagree with that statement. At the very least, I think it should be edited. Sounds kinda POV, but me saying it sounds kinda POV is POV in itself I suppose (lol). Frankly i'm not sure how you would define a "technologically primitive group". If that includes anyone not using gunpowder in the 19th century, then nearly everyone outside of europe would fall into that category. The societies I know of that used shell money (specifically the Kingdom of Kongo, Mali Empire and Asanteman) were not primitive in their day. Technology wise, all of them used the same resources militarily and politically you would find outside of Africa.  I think its safe to assume the author wasn't speaking just about Africa and I'm not knowledgible enough about the other parts of the world that used shell-money as a form of exchange. To be on the safeside, I'm gonna edit the first sentence to be a bit less inflammatory.  Holla at me here or on my talk page if there's a problem with this.Scott Free 02:42, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  slight edit 

message: — Assignment last updated by Bmellerbe (talk) 01:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ARH 371_The TransAtlantic_Cross-Cultural Representations
Talk:Toad Patrol

message: Is this a book?  Joyous  (talk) 02:03, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
:No, a TV program popular with young teens.
:I suggest merging all the characters into one article with sections. Uncle Ed 00:13, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
::Seems like a good idea to me, preferably the episodes too (or at most, one page per season). --IByte 15:49, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems like with the individual episode linking, there's some sort of attempt at an episode guide being made. Is this permitted on Wikipedia? Not that I'm complaining. It's just that I haven't seen it for any other show on here before and wasn't sure if it was allowed. Agent0042 22:17, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode Guide? 

message: Can you call it an anime?
Since it was animated in korea, and to me it looks like some korean animations, wouldn't it be a manhwa-yeonghwa?
--84.94.159.247 12:54, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know -- by that standard a lot of originally North American broadcast programs could be tagged as "anime." Agent0042 (talk) 00:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is four years later, but just to settle the matter, anime proper is produced in Japan or Korea. Shows such as Avatar: The Last Airbender and this show are not anime because they are produced outside of Asia for non-Asian audiences. They definitely are influenced by anime, though. Luthien22 (talk) 22:52, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this an anime?

message: "A show sponsor page has stated that 13 episodes of the series are currently in production." 
Shouldn't there be a source/link for where this came from? As it is there seems to be nothing proving this to be true. Kohkoa (talk) 17:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source? 

message: I like Toad Patrol. I don't like it as much as some certain contributor, or enough to fix it myself, but if someone could see to it that said contributor's glaring pro-Toad Patrol bias (not going to cite examples, but come on, you'll see it) is wiped off the page, that'd be great for anyone else who might  come across the article.
Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by InedibleHulk (talk • contribs) 09:24, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Neutral Rewrite 

message: This article has a lot of issues. However the biggest one is REFERENCES!!!! I could not find a single citation in this article. The references needed tag dates from four years ago, and nobody has fixed this. Clearly this show has a devoted cult following (thus POV edits), so I'm surprised nobody could find sources for this. I'll try and help out, but obviously there have been editors on this page before me who are more passionate about this topic than me. Luthien22 (talk) 22:57, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  REFERENCES! 

message: I removed Category:Television series by Mattel Creations because Toad Patrol is not produced by the company! 85.255.233.97 (talk) 10:28, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Show not produced by Mattel Creations!
Talk:Antrax

message: I'm sorry.  Did I misread this article?  Does it really say "stalked by an ancient supercomputer"!?
- Batkins 15:05, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I reworded it to say "trapped". It's a giant supercomputer, which traps him inside of itself (it's a very large computer). -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 04:12, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording
Talk:First King of Shannara

message: Many of these links were just basic wiki links that went directly to a page like Smoke and there is still Risk. I think that many of these should be taken out. Padishar 22:24, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Characters 

message: The article Kinson Ravenlock has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
:A search for reference failed to find published (gBooks) independent references for this fictional character, fails WP:N and WP:V
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist.  The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 13:48, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[Kinson Ravenlock]]
Talk:Ilse Witch

message: I put grianne ohmsford in parenthesis after ilse witch, as they're the same character, so it would be redundant.  you could argue that since she does not consider herself to be anything but the isle witch anymore, that you should have both, but since "grianne" isn't a major character in the book... KellanFabjance (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 18:48, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  grianne/ilse witch