lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Liang Nüying

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 20:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: This article for what it is provides an intriguing story regarding the Empress's background and events during her time as Empress, but is there any way to verify this information? There is not much in way of WP:RS that I have been able to find thus far. Jefferson76 (talk) 20:11, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving this Article 
Talk:Empress Yin (He)

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 20:37, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Fadilla

message: The article is currently flagged with the  boilerplate. As one of the children of a Roman Emperor (Marcus Aurelius) who lived into adulthood, had children and became the ancestor of another Roman Empress (Annia Faustina), it seems to me that Fadilla ought to make the cut. However, what is the threshold of notability for royals? It's true that she didn't really do anything special that we know about; however, as a member of an imperial dynasty, she could be important simply by virtue of her family ties. It's an interesting theoretical question. Q·L·1968 ☿ 17:15, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Pursuant to this discussion, under which it seems generally agreed that a mewling, puking infant can make the notability cut simply by being born to a monarch, or perhaps even to a monarch's child, Fadilla would pass with flying colours. Mind you, they are talking about the present day, which is far better documented than the ancient world. Less is known for sure about Fadilla than about many of these mewling infants ... but what we do know still tempts me to retire the Notability boilerplate. Any thoughts? Q·L·1968 ☿ 18:20, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?
Talk:Rabbi Ishmael

message: Where is the source that Rabbi Yishmael is also Elisha ben Avuya?  I have looked in several places and found no mention of this.
Also, Rabbi Nechuniah ben HaKaneh was Rabbi Yishmael's teacher, not another name for Rabbi Yishmael.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Commontater (talk • contribs) 05:27, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No idea. It is probably someone's "theory" But Elisha ben Abuya is also cited in Mishnah in a few places by this name. Also, the Talmud specifically states that Elisha ben Abuya was never granted ordination in Berachot. There is a Yishmael ben Elisha who was a high priest and martyr. And then there is this Yishmael ben Elisha who is a student of Nehuniah ben HaKaneh. The only thing I can think of is that someone would reason there are not too many laws in the name of Elisha ben Abuyah, and there are many in the name of Yishmael ben Elisha, which supiciously was the name of a high priest who lived two generations earlier. But it is original research as there are no cited sources, and certainly not the Talmud itself.96.238.211.171 (talk) 07:27, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The unsourced material was removed by an IP user (07:37, 12/Sep/12). -- -- -- 21:26, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elisha ben Avuya 

message: See Talk:3 Enoch#Two Rabbi Ishmaels for a brief discussion of why I suspect there is a dating problem for his birth, as I note here in section Life. For now I'm being bold, and am going to look up some sources to clarify this mess. --Eliyahu S Talk 17:22, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The birth date discrepancy 
Talk:Mithridates V of Parthia

message: The articles states that he rules from 129-140. That doesn't really go with him being the son of Vonones II, which died in 51. Even if he was born in 51, he would have lived to be 89 - highly unlikely during that time. Travelbird (talk) 13:40, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say highly unlikely, perhaps, but not impossible. I did my best to investigate, and I'm not seeing any contradictory statements in any reliable sources about when he was supposedly born; it doesn't appear that we're trying to say the son was born before the father or any other physical impossibility. And while it may be unlikely in general, I would estimate that the likelihood rises considerably for a king in ancient Persia, who would have had close to ideal living conditions for the time and the best medical care available, compared to a peasant or a member of a less-advanced civilization. He was the youngest of five sons, and so could have been born late in Vonones's life, which would (as you point out) make his age at least in the realm of the possible. Without any reliable sources giving his birth year or other hard information showing his father to be someone else or his reign to be wrong, I would say there really isn't a conflict here, just some potentially unlikely circumstances. CThomas3 (talk) 20:38, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 
Talk:Mind machine

message: They seem to be the same thing, right? Jonathan Harford 20:21, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect to [[Dreamachine]]?

message: The term "brain machine" seems to be equivalent to "mind machine" and is at least similarly common. Please add a redirect. (149.225.14.13 (talk) 03:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: term "brain machine"?

message: The article claims that, "rapidly flashing lights may be dangerous for people with photosensitive epilepsy or other nervous disorders."  Presumably this is intended to refer to neurological disorders rather than anxiety disorders?  Can someone confirm this? 121.98.57.188 (talk) 05:33, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, certainly.  The term "nervous disorder" usually means "disorder of the nervous system". Looie496 (talk) 06:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Nervous Disorders
Talk:Vologases IV

message: Native name is just untranslatable squares for Walagaš - can someone address? Firefox 87, with the full complement of fonts installed for other languages from Apple for Mac OS 10.14 - these probably should be rendered as a file in jpg or svg format, ancient Parthian(?) not being on many English computers. Thanks for addressing.50.111.51.247 (talk) 09:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  characters not showing up
Talk:Holywell, Cornwall

message: The piece below was cut and pasted from the Penhale article, which relates to Penhale in St Enoder and thus the information about Penhale Army camp is not relevant there. Penhale Camp is at the far end of Holywell village and perhaps someone needs to incorporate it here.
:It is home to an Army Training Camp and a Training Area.
According to Legend, Penhale was once the site of Langarroc, a beautiful town with 7 fine churches.  Mining made the town rich, but with wealth came sad moral decline, so evil were it's ways  that, one night, a storm arose and buried the town and all its people beneath a sand dune.  Even now, says the legend, when the night is stormy, the bells of the seven churchs can be heard above the roar of the sea.  There may be some truth in the story, for after high winds, ancient human skeletons have sometimes been discovered there.  
About 100 years ago, a small 7th century oratory was discovered beneath the sands at nearby Perranzabuloe, and restored.  This name in old Cornish means "the church of St Piran in the sands", and the oratory is believed to mark the spot where St Piran landed from Ireland.
Arghans (talk) 19:59, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  For inclusion? 
Talk:Artificial Creativity

message: This is a pretty lame article. Is this indeed a recognised branch of AI? (I.e. is this a real term in regular use?) Ben Finn 12:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Horrible article (I've made some very minor improvements). But artificial creativity has been gaining interest as an independent branch of AI, yes. ---hthth 09:10, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I think there's definitely cause to keep this article here and try improving it. I recently started a community project of sorts for writing an overview article of artificial creativity. Possible that it'll be viable for donation to Wikipedia, or parts of it, once it gets a bit more meat on it. ---hthth 09:10, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Salvador Puig Antich

message: For avoid an edition war, i'd be thinking. We can add "his was born in Barcelona, Catalonia" and remain his nationality. So it's clear the region and country he was. Some suggestions?. Really, i don't want get in an edition war with others users. --Ravave (talk) 15:14, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've fully protected the article for 3 days so you and User:CristofolR can work out your dispute. Obviously, any other editors can feel free to express their own views on the content issue. If you can't work it out, use one of the methods of dispute resolution.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:00, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war 

message: * Although Catalonia has an own government (Spain is a country decentralized, and every region has its own goverment), that's doesn't means nothing. We doesn't confuse nationality with ideology. Even he was a catalanist nationalist, his native country was Spain in these days and nowadays, since his born to his death. Even most of references says his Catalonian, i'd be found these they say is Spanish: --Ravave (talk) 16:54, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: His political issues doesn't has to see, although he was a Catalonian anarchist. Liked him or not, he didn't denie where is from. Wikipedia no should allow political editions despite his prefereces. Well, if you prefer, i cant write this: "Salvador Puig Antich (30 May, 1948 in Barcelona, Catalonia - 2 March, 1974 Barcelona, Catalonia) was a Spanish anarchist". So everything is clear (city, region) nationality, an that's enough, with contained references. --Ravave (talk) 06:34, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

text: Well, so do you prefer?. I know the Spanish vs Catalonian situation, and the poor economy too. The legal status says meanwhile Catalonian is from Spain, the law rules, Quebec is Canadian altough there's an independentism movement too. When Catalonia get its "independence" of its nation, then you can makes changes, OK?. Also isn't incorrect write the both, what's the problem?. In Spanish Wikipedia when i write articles about biographies, i add first the city and the province or región between parentheses and later his nationality (by the moment) of iure, meanwhile Catalonian should of facto. --Ravave (talk) 10:17, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Look, i'd be thinking about to "Spanish or Catalonian" isnt correct at all. Frecuentally the anarchists says Sin Dios, ni patria, ni ley (No God, neither fatherland and not law). I don't see logic that him were a catalonian nationalist, due that the anarchist are against to states. Maybe can remove the region and the nation and leave it [just] in anarchist. --Ravave (talk) 08:19, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Much of what has been written here is inaccurate and dishonest.  Puig Antich was an anti-capitalist revolutionary and he was avowedly against nationalism, including Catalan nationalism. Charlie Lomax  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlie Lomax (talk • contribs) 17:37, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orwellian Catalan nationalism:  Puig Antich was not a Catalan nationalist
Talk:Boyne Navigation

message: As the Boyne Navigation is separate to the Boyne River (although linked to it), it is more appropriate to give it its own page, particularly now that restoration is underway. Ewanduffy 12:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Balbinus

message: Currently, the "Reign" section states, "Balbinus was probably in his early seventies: his qualifications for rule are unknown, except presumably that he was a senior senator, rich and well-connected." However, the lede and the information side bar state that he died at 60. Can someone with a better knowledge of Roman history weigh in on which is more likely correct? Magic1million (talk) 22:36, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mismatch of Information about Age
Talk:Ii–V–I progression

message: shouldn't the title be ii-V-I because the ii is minor?68.173.5.230 12:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (technical restrictions). Hyacinth (talk) 03:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Bearing that in mind, suggest the article be re-named to avoid the current misrepresentation of its contents. How about "The ii-V-I Turnaround"...?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.97.113.215 (talk) 19:14, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ii vs II: Technical restrictions on article titles

message: The Jazz section offers examples in the key of F, whereas most of the pages that link to this page offer examples in the key of C. I will transpose these unless someone has a good reason not to. Persaonlly, I think the blues should be presented in E, it's traditional guitar key, but let's ignore bias and go for simplicity!
Also, I'm not sure that the first example's explanation is well worded, or indeed sensible. Could you please take another look? 
Thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.97.113.215 (talk) 19:12, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Jazz - Clarity

message: Article says the ii V I has been used "for a hundred years" - surely it's been around longer than that? Since Bach at least - probably before that too. Czgibson (talk) 11:57, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, the function has been around since Aristotle, I'm sure. The idiom of using Roman numerals to indicate functional analysis or compositional shorthand probably really is barely 100 years old.--76.247.105.43 (talk) 10:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How long? 

message: I have been playing blues and rock for 35 years and have a basic amount of musical theory and I can't make head or tail of this article. There must be a better way of explaining what I believe is a fundamental technique in jazz improvisation. This article is utterly hopeless for anyone who wouldn't already fully understand the technique. It therefore fails as an encyclopedia article. ElectricRay (talk) 17:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: For one, the "Jazz" section is entirely unsourced and appears to be personal commentary (tagged for original research since June 2019). Propose to remove it altogether, so others may be inclined to add more useful info. —Ojorojo (talk) 15:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Way too technical/badly written
Talk:Cao Hong

message: May I ask what are the sources for these juicy tidbits regarding Cao Hong, especially those that concerned his tendency to tease Cao Zhen's chubbiness? All I've found was a few words uttered by Cao Hong egging Cao Zhen on when Zhen was teased by Wu Zhi.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inkstone (talk • contribs) 16:38, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed some of the unsourced parts. I've no idea where they came from too.   LDS  contact me 16:06, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for Cao Hong's reputation as a prankster?
Talk:Moments In Time

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved as requested.  ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS)  01:01, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Moments In Time →  – Caps QuietHere (talk) 00:41, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 December 2022
Talk:Cao Zhen

message: A few days earlier, when I went through some materials on Zhuge's 1st & 2nd expedition, I again looked into this character, and I happened to notice some modern commentators on stating Wu Zhi and Cao Hong maliciously teased on Zhen's body shape without giving out their source, so I spent some time on the issue, and indeed found related records in Weilue. I'll paste the passages into the main article as cn soon.
Never imagined Cao Zhen as a clump of fat previously... so bad for him, he must be overburdened by his weight as a cavalry general when he tailed Liu Bei at Changban.----EkmanLi (talk) 08:56, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The pitiful, fat Supreme General Cao Zhen
Talk:Cassius Longinus (philosopher)

message: The name 'Dionysius' is definitely wrong. It is due to a confusion with the author of peri hypsus (Pseudo-Longinus) who is named Longinus or Dionysius in a manuscript. The matter is explained in the article Longinus (literature) as follows: "In the reference manuscript (Parisinus Graecus 2036), the heading reports “Dionysius or Longinus”, an ascription by the medieval copyist that was misread as "by Dionysius Longinus." When the manuscript was being prepared for printed publication, the work was initially attributed to Cassius Dionysius Longinus (c. 213-273 CE). Since the correct translation includes the possibility of an author named “Dionysius,” some have attributed the work to Dionysius of Halicarnassus, a writer of the first century CE (Grube xviii). There remains the possibility that the work belongs to neither Cassius Longinus nor Dionysius of Halicarnassus, but, rather, some unknown author writing under the Roman Empire, likely in the first century. The error does imply that when the codex was written, the trails of the real author were already lost. Neither author can be accepted as the actual writer of the treatise." But there, too, it is not properly understood that the only reason for calling Kassios Longinos "Cassius Dionysius Longinus" is the misunderstanding of the heading in the Paris manuscript. So please remove "Dionysius" (that's 19th century scholarship, the facts were already known by 1900) 89.59.29.146 21:16, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, done. Singinglemon (talk) 00:22, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Public Television Service

message: I think Taiwan Public Television Service Foundation recently took over Chinese Television System. – Kaihsu 13:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Empress Cao (Han dynasty)

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 21:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: As a 3rd century ruler she is also a 3rd century female ruler! Hugo999 (talk) 01:14, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ruler
Talk:Empress Mingdao

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 21:12, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Empress Wu (Zhaolie)

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 21:07, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Empress Zhen (Cao Fang)

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 21:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus. Jenks24 (talk) 14:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Empress Zhen (Cao Fang) →  – I don't believe Empress Dowager Ci'an was known as "Empress Zhen" in history. She was known as "Consort Zhen" before she became an empress, but that name didn't carry over. Regardless in the WP:TWODABS situation, the issue can be easily resolved by hatnotes. Timmyshin (talk) 22:56, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 31 July 2015
Talk:Fulvia Plautilla

message: The one citation that his article has is unfounded. The book referenced has been scanned by google books and the page listed (p. 535) contains no reference to a bust of Plautilla in the Lourve. Nor can I find anywhere in the book a reference to such a bust. There is only one mention of her name in the entire book. If someone can come up with a reliable source, we can keep the information, otherwise, both the mention in the article and the source should be deleted.
--75.11.190.40 (talk) 20:42, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Talk:Hiyya bar Abba

message: "Rabbi Hiyya bar Abba" is an amora living in the Land of Israel, of the 3th generation. The correct name is Rabbi Hiyya. Yanbushad 20:42, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big mistake 

message: * R. Hiyya - Amora of the Land of Israel, of the  first generation of the Amoraim sages.
* Rabbi Hiyya b. [ben/Bar] Abba - Amora of the Land of Israel, of the third generation of the Amoraim sages.  
see table: 
http://he.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D7%AA%D7%91%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%AA:%D7%90%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%90%D7%99%D7%9D&oldid=8604557
--Midrashah (talk) 21:28, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Solving the maze of the Hiyya sages

message: This article seems to be about both sages:
# R. Hiyya - Active in Tiberias (mentioned in this article) - lived there
# Rabbi Hiyya b. [ben/Bar] Abba was a dicipline of Yochanan bar Nafcha and Eleazar ben Pedath (mentioned in this article), but lived in third generation of Amoraim (290 – 320 CE), not as mentioned in the article (the article says: 180-230 AD)
--Midrashah (talk) 06:23, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional note
Talk:Huang Zu

message: The last sentence of this section seems slightly too romanticized for Wikipedia. Thoughts? --82.17.60.254 (talk) 21:09, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Downfall
Talk:Ilembe

message: The articles Ilembe: Honoring Shaka Zulu and Ilembe discuss exactly the same album; one released in 2007 the other released in 2008. Wayne Jayes (talk) 19:46, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and  Klbrain (talk) 21:08, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Galantamine total synthesis

message: Does this subject deserve so much space on Wikipedia?  A few references would do.  Could easily be incorporated in the article on glalantamine, with those few references.  Except for very, very few biochemists, who cares? Mwinog2777 05:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Alluc

message: Alluc is currently one of the most increasingly visited site everyday. The principle of the website is to provide links to thousands of TV shows and Movies to the public and members of Alluc.org. This site is very similar to peekvid.com, but in fact 'better'. We are merely adding to Wiki because this website is forecasted to become huge within the next year. Maybe you should visit the website or actually bother to read what we have written. There are many other reason why this should be not be deleted. If anymore questions to do with this website or anymore suggestions of examples what we add to this wiki page, then just reply here because it doesn't deserve to be deleted. --Dannyboy1010 13:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Mi Heng

message: This article deals with a fictional world...need a rewrite, don't know the tag. Is Mi Heng even a real person or a fictional figure? Aurora sword (talk) 01:11, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Where did you get the idea that this article deals with a fictional world? Is the article not clear about the time period and locale he hailed from? _dk (talk) 08:33, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled