Talk:Urticating hair

message: The article only mentions urticating hairs on tarantulas, but they are apparently not unique to tarantulas (or even arachnids). I followed a link from Pupa to get to this article. Urticating hairs are also found on caterpillars such as the Oak Processionary. Perhaps someone who knows more about the subject could rewrite the article to reflect this. (Or correct the links on the other articles if they are directed here erroneously.) 134.58.43.46 15:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A lot on caterpillars since added. David notMD (talk) 22:22, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Species

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:31, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Reaction of human skin to urticating hairs.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: The title of the page includes the word "hair", but the the word is not used until the third section on the page. Bristle is defined as a hair or feather, but feathers are not involved here. I'd like to change "bristle" to "hair" throughout the page. Nadiatalent (talk) 21:59, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This should have been done long ago. I've done it now. The alternative is to move the article (but then plants would have to be excluded). Peter coxhead (talk) 11:41, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

text: Yet we have  "17:04, 30 April 2020‎ Skipcress +409‎  Added note that "urticating hairs" is a misnomer, as only mammals have hair. Changed all instances of the word "hair"/"hairs" to "bristle"/"bristles," except for the term "urticating hair"/"urticating hairs," as this is technically more correct."  I'm sorry, but I am confused.  "urticating hair" is correct, despite it not actually being a hair?  How is this? Perhaps this should be "Urticating Setae"?  ThomasHarrisGrantsPass (talk) 15:11, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Hairs or bristles?

message: It doesn't seem to be properly defined here, and an Internet search just leads right back here.  Do we have any source for this term ? StuRat (talk) 14:45, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No longer appears in the article; it seems to have been a typo. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Define "Ultricate" 

message: Added rash image from Brown-tail moth article. David notMD (talk) 22:22, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added rash image 

message: can the title be changed to "urticating bristles" seeing as they are not hairs?
i can't find how to edit titles, but if that is done, i will edit anything else that has hair instead of bristle
:See the comments above. This article covers plants as well as other organisms. They aren't called "bristles" in plants. They are also called "urticating hairs" in  (e.g. p. 15). Peter coxhead (talk) 10:12, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment moved