Talk:Estimation theory

message: I think estimation (of what's directly relevant to statistics) should be merged into [[estimation theory). Cburnett 03:25, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging

message: I disagree with this merge.  Estimation theory and an estimator are not the same.  One being a theory on how to estimate and the other being a function of estimation.  For example, estimation theory is not the same as the Minimum mean-square error, and vice-versa.  I suppose you could say mathematics is not the same as function (mathematics).
Perhaps some material can be exchanged between them, but not a merge. Cburnett 18:27, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Estimator]] 

message: Estimation Theory and Statistical Point Estimation are two totally different approaches to the same thing. The nomeclature and methods are almost orthogonal.
--Lucas Gallindo 17:36, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Against Merge 

message: I think a problem with this page is that it is very much focussed on Estimation Theory as it is understood in engineering esp. Signal Processing. There is also a mathematical science called Statistics which treates Estimation (and hence Estimators), Testing (and hence Statistical Tests), and so on. In principle Statistics is applicable in medicine, biology, physics, social science, economics,  .... engineering ... law, sport, consumer studies ... . The page on Estimator about which there is discussion above is an example of the topic seen from Statistics. Obviously people from engineering will hardly recognise that it's all, in principle, about the same thing, and vice versa. 
The subject of Estimation Theory is: construction, design, evaluation of Estimators! So one hardly needs two different pages with those two titles. I suppose that Interval Estimation is also part of estimation theory, while presently it is only treated under Estimators and not under Estimation !!!
I think there should be a general page on Estimation Theory with subtopics on Estimation theory in engineering etc.. as far as these subfields cannot identifiy themselves with the broad topic Gill110951 08:01, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Statistics versus signal processing

message: “See also“ “Grey box completion and validation“ has been removed anonymously without explanation from this and several other topics. Following advice from Wikipedia if there are no objections (please provide your name and reasons), I plan to reinstate the reference in a weeks time. 
The removed reference provides additional information on methods of estimating model details. In particular most models are incomplete (i.e. a grey box) and thus need completion and validation. This reference seems to be within the appropriate content of the “See also” section see Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Layout#See_also_section.
BillWhiten (talk) 05:20, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re Grey box completion and validation 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Estimation theory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081120085633/http://www.rsscse.org.uk/ts/gtb/contents.html to http://www.rsscse.org.uk/ts/gtb/contents.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Estimation theory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050428233957/http://gunston.gmu.edu/demt/demtp1/ to http://gunston.gmu.edu/demt/demtp1/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:14, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article really needs to be expanded. 
For example: "It is then necessary to define the Bayesian probability π(θ)." <-- even with the link, it is totally not clear why this is required and how this is done.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JHBonarius (talk • contribs) 13:46, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs improvement