Talk:KTTV

message: I noticed some revert wars regarding the Fox branding on several articles on Fox-owned stations. The official name of the network is not all uppercase, but that is how the company prefers it.
So, do we call it "Fox" or "FOX"? You decide. CoolKatt number 99999 02:20, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See my response at Talk:WNYW.  Rollosmokes 07:11, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fox" or "FOX"? 

message: When Did KTTV Bring Fox Kids Back?
It hasn't...as far as I know, the agreement between Fox and 4KIds TV was for only five years, ending this past TV season('06-'07), but apparently, that has changed, and now Fox Kids! is gone for good...I think...Baldwin91006 02:19, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fox Kids

message: To all editors, please see the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Newscast_schedules.2C_redux, where the issue of removing locally originated programming schedules is discussed. Calwatch 05:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of newscast schedules?

message: They are doing it in response to a news story they did last night, and they're reading the forums! Would this be notable enough for Wikipedia? No need for "primary sources", because the primary source is the raided message board! ViperSnake151 13:50, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it was more like 420chan, since although 7chan could be considered one of their "secret websites", they don't have an /i/ board anymore, but 420chan does. ViperSnake151 00:02, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  eBaum users raiding MyFoxLA? 

message: FOX News Cast in Question. I think this event has some encyclopedic value, in a similar fashion as Dewey Defeats Truman, Fear%2C_uncertainty_and_doubt#Contemporary_examples, Red Scare, Witch-hunt, etc. Its an example of poor journalism and demonization of technology. If there is reactionary occurrences or further development, I think it should get its own article. I assume I am probably in the minority here, though. Does any one have any suggestions as to where mention of this incident may be better served? ._-zro tc 08:36, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hacker Gangs" Controversy 

message: :Image:FOX11- 1991.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 07:47, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:FOX11- 1991.jpg

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KTTV/KTWV_Tower this link redirects to List of tallest structures in the world http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_structures_in_the_world
this page does not list this tower, either the / in the link screws it up, or it goes to the right page, but the page has had the KTTV/KTWV tower info removed  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.148.199.66 (talk) 05:49, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad Link 

message: The image :Image:Kttv70s.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:43, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Kttv70s.jpg

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to a list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 19:50, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on KTTV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111115041821/http://www.myfoxla.com:80/subindex/studio_11_la to http://www.myfoxla.com/subindex/studio_11_la
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:48, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on KTTV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090614204506/http://issuu.com:80/boxoffice/docs/boxoffice_111056-1 to http://issuu.com/boxoffice/docs/boxoffice_111056-1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on KTTV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080522123812/http://www.myfoxla.com/myfox/pages/Home/Detail?contentId=3894628&version=7&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=VSTY&pageId=1.1.1&sflg=1 to http://www.myfoxla.com/myfox/pages/ContentDetail?contentId=3894628
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Here is the correct subchannel lineup for KTTV: 
And here's KCOP: 
Two separate stations. KCOP is carrying 11.2 and 11.3 on its own transmitter. KTTV just has 11.1 and 11.4. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 22:28, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct subchannel lineup