Talk:Rana Sanga

message: I have no intention of correcting this work but the introduction and text are horribly written with an obvious personal bias.  "valiant" "chivalry and generosity" "his gallantry inspired many others" "bravely" "exemplary king" "indomitable spirit" "Rajput kings were famous for their bravery, love of the country"  "The pinnacle of prosperity, the heights of valour."   
A more impartial approach would read far better.  
Hi all, I can assure everybody that the correct spelling of this king's name is Sanga, and not Sangha. Trust me on this. So please do not revert the changes that I am making.
I agree fully with the apprehension felt about the introduction. Just the fact that he murdered all his brothers seems glossed over by continuing with epiteths such as "valiant" suggest that the writer is not only biased but perhaps lacking in perception as well.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.250.177.237 (talk) 19:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are no one to represent historians for this topic considering you might only be getting to know him from this article itself 219.74.109.148 (talk) 12:05, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Heroic Myth versus History Scholarship

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:11, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 

message: At writing, the third sentence under "Conquest of Malwa" reads "Wary of his Rajput Wazir Medini Rai's power, the politically weak Mehmod sought outside assistance from both Sultan Ibrahim Lodi of Delhi and Bahadur Shah of Gujarat."  In adding wikilinks to it earlier, I inadvertently linked to disambiguation pages for "Wazir" as well as for "Bahadur Shah".  The latter of these is now fixed in such a way that the man's name links to the entry for the man, "of" links to nothing, and "Gujarat" links to -- well, Gujarat.  :^) :^)
The former of these, however, is more problematic.  Lacking any plausible and readily verifiable reason for changing it, I have retained the prior editor's visible spelling of "Wazir", but in order to avoid linking to the likewise-named disambiguation page, I have actually linked the visible "Wazir" to the entry for "Vizier", i.e., the title, rather than "Wazir", the ethnic group.  This is pure guesswork on my part.  It strikes me as the more plausible gloss of the word "Wazir" in this context, but my paucity of knowledge of the subject matter does not by any means allow for me to claim the particular link which I've selected as the only possible one.  I therefore sincerely hope that somebody who does know what I do not, here, will clarify, possibly fix (if needed), and ultimately verify whichever disposition in the matter may eventually be found through consensus to be the actual fact which we're attempting to convey to readers, here.
I do not actually know which article should be linked, but believe "Wazir" should lead to something unambiguous one way of another, because for readers (like myself) who come to this page knowing nothing whatsoever of the subject matter, the simple string of unlinked text reading "Rajput Wazir Medini Rai" may logically be parsed in several very different ways, from a four-word proper (though not necessarily personal) noun at one extreme, to a four-word formal title of some unnamed person or another on the other hand.  I personally consider that to be unfortunate, insofar as it reduces a complex, compelling story to an arbitrary string of letters utterly devoid of meaning for readers with neither the time, wherewithal, nor perhaps even the merest inclination to look into matters just a little tiny bit further than they might only ever do if the words in that phrase (and others like it) are appropriately linked.
I very much look forward to seeing how this entry continues to develop over time.  Thank you to everyone who has contributed already, making it very much well worth my time to do a little copy editing.  Cheers, Xeltifon (talk) 13:54, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rajput Vizier/Wazir Medini Rai Disambiguation 

message: why did rana sanga moved towards delhi instead of towards pakistan or afganisthan and stopped the flow through which outsiders are comming? External / outsiders are comming to delhi through pakistan and afganisthan. He would have first moved towards pakistan and afganistan so that these people would not have got help from outsiders to stay in India. If it srikrishnadevaraya living at the time he would have made a promise that "untill and unless I catch hold of Sardar Silhadi of Raisen I willnot keep my foot inside chittor".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.6.57.119 (talk) 04:01, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  general discussion 

message: Substituted at 03:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: As per the local tradition in hadoti region, the nahan (religious bath) before Holi is observed in honour of a valorous gujjar named Sanga who sacrificed his life in the month of Holi. It is to be noted that Sanga and Rana Sanga were the same person, who died on 17th March 1527 (five days from Holi). I dont think any more proof is needed to show what the truth is.
This information is available at 
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2011/20110320/spectrum/main1.htm The Real Rana (talk) 04:02, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gurjar origin of Mewar house 

message: For the ease of future editors and admins.
This article is disrupted in the past by sockpuppeter.
.Heba Aisha (talk) 23:00, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sock activity on article 

message: It is mentioned in this section that He also stopped wearing Turban and used to wrap up cloth over his head Turban is a cloth wrapped over the head so this statement seems contradictory as a result of poor phrasing.Anyone could rephrase it so that it sounds correctly?  --Navin123explorer (talk) 19:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification regarding Death and succession section 

message: Rana sanga 223.239.24.158 (talk) 05:44, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sst 

message: Sangram Singha Ali is associated with which kingdom? 2409:408A:8E00:317F:0:0:9B49:960B (talk) 07:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assam history 

message: I have Removed the Fictional Map based on Conquests of Rana Sanga as it is disscussed in the Article of Mewar-Delhi Sultanate wars.
 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mewar-Delhi_Sultanate_Wars#:~:text=The%20Mewar%2DDelhi%20Sultanate%20Wars,century%20to%20early%2016th%20century. DeepstoneV (talk) 19:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing Fictional Map