lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Targa Tasmania

message: In addition to this being rather poorly laid out article, there is a strong bias in the introductory section about the original concept of the event, which is not referenced. Needs to be fixed, this is an article about what the event actually is, not what it might have been. --Falcadore (talk) 00:10, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Formula Holden

message: Thought Hangar had used a Ralt RT4 Formula Atlantic car to win the Oz Boss title. --Falcadore (talk) 03:07, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007 series

message: Which car was designed by Garry Rogers Motorsport, and what were the circumstances? That sentence now reads badly but before I ammend I'd like to know the details. --Falcadore (talk) 07:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There was one for sale on my105, but it has just sold. I gather that GRM manufactured them using a March design. xbgs351 6 March 2008  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.243.254.204 (talk) 04:52, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds unliekly to me. GRM did not acquire the manufacturing ability to support their touring cars until 1999, yet they had the ability to manufacture open wheelers ten years earlier? If you are referring to the venerable March 87B chassis that raced sporadically in F-Holden, there was a March 87B F3000 chassis imported in 1988 which was used to prove the viability of the concept of bolting the Buick V6 engine to a F3000 chassis.  The car raced briefly with Chris Hocking originally before being used by Chas Talbot for several seasons, but how GRM got involved, (considering back in 1989 GRM did not really exist and did not really start becoming a professional race team until about 1993) is a little baffling. --Falcadore (talk) 08:43, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: How about rebuilt Marches then?  http://forums.autosport.com/showthread.php?s=3afe09826a16fb2c8b0b3b4ce3302b35&threadid=66554 123.243.254.204 (talk) 01:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly wasn't by GRM though was it? I'm removing the reference. --Falcadore (talk) 03:06, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GRM Formula Holden 
Talk:Gold Coast Indy 300

message: According to the IRL media quide, the present IRL Dallara is essentially the 2003 car, not the 2002 car, but each year they have aerodynamic updates and fiddles. So the correct chassis designation would either by IR3 or IR8, I've seen both used, but certainly IR2 is wrong. --Falcadore (talk) 05:05, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dallara IR2 

message: Given that the race is no longer on the IndyCar series calendar, I think that the page should be moved to Surfers Paradise Street Circuit, as it will no longer be referred to by it's previous name once it becomes part of the A1 Grand Prix series. Thoughts/comments? TheChrisD Rants•Edits 09:38, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Split rather than moved I think. 18 years is a lot of history, and its straddled the IRL/CART war, the Indy 300 probably deserves to be retained as its own race article. --Falcadore (talk) 11:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Sorry for the LONG delay in this, but I've split all non-American open wheel race information to Surfers Paradise Street Circuit. Now to begin the arduous task of changing those links which matter to point to the right page... TheChrisD Rants•Edits 19:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to [[Surfers Paradise Street Circuit]]? 
Talk:PGA Tour of Australasia

message: What are the requirements for registering in the Q-School?
122.57.65.18 (talk) 11:36, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joining 
Talk:National colours of Australia

message: According to this article, but there was no Australian tour in England in 1899 listed, so one or the other must be wrong: History_of_Australian_cricket_from_1890-91_to_1900
--217.45.170.19 (talk) 14:37, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The claim here is sourced, but the source is dead. Baggy green has a couple of sources that tell us that cap was first used in 1877. Could wwe use them? HiLo48 (talk) 17:41, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cricket team first wore them on tour of England in 1899 

message: It is strange that the only kit diagram is of a kit not in the colours of the article. If kit diagrams are available, please could they be added, and before the not-green-not-gold counter-example. JDAWiseman (talk) 20:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  G&G kit diagrams
Talk:Acacia pycnantha

message: To check later...., , ....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:53, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Director Marc Klasfeld with Lil Wayne" instead of the plant.?  Tenorcnj (talk) 14:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Image vandal

message: Right, I have removed these - the talk at Doon Doon I can't find anywhere online. It appears to be one person's finding of mateiral in one tree (possibly related to this as in same area of NSW and mentions Itra Cortex?). The other fact strikes me as pretty general for plants and would be worth including if there were some lay significance or ended up in other journals/research, but I can't see any specific for A. pycnantha. If someone thinks we should keep in..or has any opinion, please comment. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:46, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Phytochemistry material

message: colors Virgilio c baldovino (talk) 13:39, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Umm, can you elaborate? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:36, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  #garden culture 

message: ...I don't know the source cited, but it's totally considered a weed in the Bay Area.  It lines roads in Santa Cruz, and is a pest.  My local guides all name it, and I can't find it on the UC SC pages, but it's there somewhere... I gotta say there needs a better source. 50.136.158.31 (talk) 16:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There is precious little online about it and the one page I have found is already in the article. Links to any more would be great if anyone finds any. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  California Naturalized 
Talk:Ironman (surf lifesaving)

message: I added a section describing the race itself. If anyone has any images or other info to add that would be great
Monkeybusiness101 (talk) 04:34, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: The Race
Talk:Cliff Young Australian 6-day race

message: I have added more information about the race. Please re-evaluate your comments concerning notability in the light of interest in this topic and its place in the multiday running arena as one of the longest running 6 day events in the world.
I Wonder 00:37, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Colac, Victoria

message: Added photo of old building - is it a bank? Can anyone identify it. Now used by Colac ACE. Also added photo of the Old Beechy line walking trail. Peterdownunder (talk) 07:04, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos
Talk:RadioWorks

message: RadioWorks is now defunct and has been merged into its owner, MediaWorks New Zealand, as per this page. As a consequence I have done the same to this page, and removed the WikiProject New Zealand and WikiProject Radio Stations tags from this talk page, and redirected this page to the MediaWorks New Zealand page. If you disagree, feel free to revert my edits and discuss. Cheers and smiles. --Matamike (talk) 07:43, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Grandmasterka

message: *User:Mradyfist first made me fully aware of Wikipedia; he is an avid reader of articles, but has only two edits. I now have around 4000.
*I am in four Wikiprojects now; the only one I have made what I would call "major" contributions to is Wikiproject Porto.
*Spanish is a very common language here in Minneapolis (and is one of four official languages here; the other three are English, Hmong and Somali.) Portuguese is exceedingly rare. I grew up in the vicinity of Spanish language speakers and I actually use it at work most days. I'm still not the greatest at it and it's more useful for conversation than for writing encyclopedia articles (my first article attempt on ES.WP was deleted as "illegible"... Ouch!)
*I want to get ahold of a textbook to fully learn Portuguese, despite my limited resources at the moment and the rarity of the language in my area. Besides my major interest in it now, I want myself to be a good ambassador to Portuguese editors, and I have some very basic communication skills, but I can do more for editors such as this guy, rather than just the passive interpretation of the language that I have exercised up until now (although it's easy to read with a background in Spanish.) I wanted to be pt-2 by the end of the summer, but that may be a somewhat lofty goal at this point... We'll see.
*I have patrolled :Category:Conspiracy theories a few times... I've helped in cleaning up a few of these pages, directly or indirectly (this is how I found New Chronology (Fomenko).) You should try patrolling certain controversial categories sometime; patrolling this category has given me experience in cleaning up some of the ugliest articles on Wikipedia, and experience in the effective application of the undue weight section of WP:NPOV. Grandmasterka 05:01, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What Got Cut:Things I thought of including in my answers but ended up leaving out
Talk:Sharelle McMahon

message: Bamawam in box, recent change, typo. 
Bamawm in text, changed Aug 2016, from Bendigo. 
MBG02 (talk) 21:49, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bendigo maybe
Talk:Football Queensland Metro

message: I think we really need to consolidate the information on the Football Brisbane, Brisbane Premier League, Brisbane Premier League Division 1] and  Brisbane Premier League Division 2. At the moment we've got basically four stub class articles but if combined I think we'd be able to make a nice solid article. Thoughts? Bongomanrae (talk) 11:05, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, at the end of the day, they really don't need to have an article each. Perhaps also include information about Junior and Women's football on this page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.31.240.10 (talk) 11:39, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge articles
Template talk:User lzh

message: lol can someone explain the meaning of the words 203.218.88.254 08:27, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Haha I didn't understand it because I didn't realise which direction it was written. But why are 2,3 and 4 completely different? Shouldn't they all be variations on 此人略通文言文? Native (that means this one) is fine though. 219.77.98.166 13:10, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly, I don't think anyone on earth can understand what the words mean. What's astonishing is there're users who actually put up the template on their user's page. You never know...--K.C. Tang (talk) 05:03, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:NexG PrePaid

message: *Page created on 9'th July 2006 at 16.27 (+8 GMT). Pavithran 08:28, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Created

message: *The article is not an advert, it's meant to explain what NexG is. But I do agree that at the moment the article does indeed look very much like an advert and there are issues with notability. It's your call Mr.Admin sir.--Pavithran (talk) 10:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion
Talk:Janine Ilitch

message: I just removed a good amount of content from the article as not verified through cited reliable sources. Per policy on biographies of living persons, inadequately referenced material is to be removed immediately. The version of the article before I performed the removal is this. If you can, please find sources that verify any of the information before adding stuff back. Thank you. Dancter 14:19, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, no. If you actually read the policy, it says that you should do this is if the material is contentious. The content isn't negative, and it isn't even questionable. This article, like most of Wikipedia, lacks sources. The solution to that is to actually do the work and find sources, rather than spending ones time needlessly stubbing articles. Rebecca 10:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As I understood it, harmful information does not need to be negative. If you examined some of my edits, I did do some work trying to find sources, add added them in. WP:BLP stressed that the article needs to be right. A page I pulled up in a search contradicted the listed birthdate, and while I'm not sure about the accuracy of that page, it did alert me that the article's birthdate was not supported by a source, and for all I knew, could be wrong. Paragraphs two and three struck me as POV. As a reader with no prior knowledge and some search page findings, I questioned quite a bit of the article. I wasn't trying to perform a careless drive-by stubbing. But you've been around much longer than I have, and are trusted by the community, so I'll defer to you. I've been performing similar removals on other living persons articles, though not to the same extent, but perhaps I should back off from those, as well. Dancter 15:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The appropriate thing to do in that instance would have been to put a fact tag on the birthdate, and tidy up the second and third paragraphs, stripping away the POV, rather than blanking them. I can't see anything in there that is factually disputable once one removes the spin - just fairly mundane, easily referenced, career facts. Rebecca 00:57, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: content moved from the article as unsourced
Talk:North Queensland Broomball Association

message: Can we please have a game description??
As an "Encyclopedia", people generally look something up in Wikipedia to find out what it is.
Either a general [referenced] description of rules in great brief or generality, or some clear description of play as the game unfolds.
That is the prime point of an encyclopedia; it is somewhat a more thorough treatment than a dictionary, with implications for culture, region, etc., etc.
Thanks very much.(Denidowi (talk) 01:37, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game Description??
Talk:Capital Football

message: I had proposed that Capital Football be merged into Football (soccer) in the Australian Capital Territory, but have determined that there should still be two articles.  This Capital Football article remains to refer to the organisation alone.  The competitions are now included in Football (soccer) in the Australian Capital Territory. Tomperc 02:36, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Partial merger
Talk:Cockbite

message: I realize that this article has been speedily deleted multiple times. As such, I think that a rationale explaining another creation is in order. I'm going to create a redirect to Rooster Teeth Productions here, the rationale being as follows:
*As stated in the lead of the target article, Rooster Teeth is a self-defined euphemism for cockbite, an insult the group used in one of their trailers.
*A redirect may prevent the creation of dicdef articles as seen in the deletion log.
— TKD::Talk 08:33, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for redirect
Talk:Queensland Rugby Union

message: I intend to change this redirect into a disambiguation. The Northern Rugby Union was the early name for the Rugby Football League in England as well as being the early name for the Queensland Rugby Union. Any objections?GordyB16:06, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Northern Rugby Union
Talk:Australian Chess Federation

message: Hi! from
* VIAF search: "Chess Federation"
* http://viaf.org/viaf/122520794/#Australian_Chess_Federation
More information soon. Regards ‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏T‏·‏m‏:‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 08:37, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  VIAF:122520794
Talk:Australia A cricket team

message: I don't understand the table headings at all:
:"First-class v A team" "Other first-class" "List A v A team" "Other List A" 
No idea. jnestorius(talk) 19:58, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Table
Talk:List of South Australian Lacrosse Premiers

message: I've added the premierships won by Adelaide Uni back in the 1890's. This information has been garnered from contemporary photos in posession of the club. The club were runners up in 1897, I can't find reference to whom they competed against. Ozdaren 12:12, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adelaide University 

message: got extra info from an old SA lacrosse article ... listed AULC premierships in 1890, 91, 94-95-96-98, 1902 and 1908 ... no mention of 1893 ... ? also won unofficial premierships in 1942 and 1944 (war years) ... apparently West Torrens won in 1945 Lukeoz (talk) 05:21, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  old premierships 

message: came across an article from the Observer newspaper dated Saturday, 27 August, 1904, pages 19 column E and 20 column A ... with a great lot of detail that listed the premiers and runners-up from 1888 to 1904
also found an article from the Express and Telegraph dated 30 May, 1888 (page 7g) that twice mentioned North Adelaide as "last year's premiers" ... I have added North Adelaide as premiers for 1887 (their first year of existence) though it might be unofficial as SALA wasn't formed until 1888. Lukeoz (talk) 06:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  premierships 1887-1904
Talk:Sydney Football Stadium (1988)

message: Has anyone got a good source for the capacity being 45,500? The stadium's site itself says 44,000, so what's the deal? Macktheknifeau 05:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Capacity

message: I'm not getting much of a response at Template talk:Infobox Stadium so I'll ask here - what do people think of the sample tenants section in the layout displayed at: Template_talk:Infobox_Stadium#New_.27tenants.27_format? (please reply on that page to keep discussion in the one place) -- Chuq (talk) 08:31, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox suggestion 

message: I'm no expert here but it's no longer called Aussie stadium, it's back to being the Sydney Football Stadium. Also, the Sydney Cricket Ground is a circle, not an oval. Google earth it and see for yourself ;)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.101.43.100 (talk) 19:55, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Misinformation

message: A discussion that involves this article is taking place at Talk:Sydney Football Stadium (2022)#Primary topic. Verinaliad (talk) 10:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary topic
Talk:Mental process

message: * This article should be removed completely and redirected to the philosophy of mind!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.92.9.55 (talk) 12:02, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: umm, what is the difference between a procedure and a function? BriEnBest (talk) 12:04, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: are choices (specifically those involving actions) mental functions?  BriEnBest (talk) 12:04, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  choices 

message: None of the mental processes listed overleaf meets the requirement of being a process as defined elsewhere. Calling them mental is really mental and detrimental.
Genezistan (talk) 15:01, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Process vs. abstractions

message: Mental processes seems to link itself to cognitive function and intellectual function with cognition just being a subtype of mental processes. Is this redirect necessary?
Idiacanthus 16:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: as it stood it wasn't a proper article. No sources at all for over 6 years and unclear. What do you suggest? Doug Weller talk 17:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  What if we made some sort of disambiguation or directory to its child pages? Idiacanthus 12:28, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm not sure exactly what you're proposing, but the text of Intellectual function is "Intellectual function is an accepted way of saying mental function and broader than cognitive function in that it includes psychomotor components. This fundamental distinction is not made clear anywhere else in Wikipedia." No sources and of course the meta-statement doesn't belong there. Doug Weller talk 17:01, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Alright, that's fair. On that note then, should Intellectual function perhaps redirect to Cognition as well? Idiacanthus 20:28, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Necessary Redirect?
Talk:Programme Towards the Elimination of the worst forms of Child Labour

message: Sorry to 196.207.47.60, as I accidentally reverted your useful edit. Immediately reverted my own revert. --Killfest2 08:57, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apologies 
Talk:FBI Seeking Information – Terrorism list

message: Please be scrupulous, if you are editing this article, in identifying which of the individuals described have been formally accused (indicted) or convicted of terrorism-related crimes. You should also note if possible whether charges have been brought in the United States or elsewhere; the procedures for conviction in an American civilian court, in an American military tribunal, or in a country such as Yemen or Saudi Arabia are all very different.
Because many of these people are still living, and because these charges are of course very serious, a high standard of conduct should regulate the tone and content of this article. Stating or implying that an individual is a terrorist here, when they are merely suspected of terrorism but have not been accused, tried or convicted, is obviously problematic.
Lastly, this article should be properly sourced. I've been making some changes to tone and removing unsourced assertions, but the article would benefit from new sources. Will work on this when I've time. -Darouet (talk) 19:11, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrorist versus alleged terrorist 
Talk:CFA Training College

message: From what I can tell, it seems that "Fiskville" is an alternative name for the facility, and that there is not a separate populated place named Fiskville.  So I would think the article should be titled "CFA Training College", with explanation that "Fiskville" is an alternative name.  Rather than implying that there is a CFA Training College located in a town of Fiskville. 
Note I set up a disambiguation page at Fiskville, which used to redirect to this page. --Doncram (talk) 19:22, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title?  Possible move?
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Randall Brackett 4

message: #::This was not Vitriouxc, this was an IP address.  — The King of Kings 02:35 July 09 '06
#:::Someone restored the !vote saying it is, but that too was from an IP address. Vitriouxc, please log in to confirm your identity. joturner 03:54, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Flag of Victoria (state)

message: The file :File:Flag of the Victoria Police.svg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Flag of the Victoria Police.svg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 06:47, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Flag of the Victoria Police.svg]] 

message: Currently the article claims the flag was adopted in 1865, I believe this is a result of a mis-reading of the original cited source archived here, which only dates the passing of the Colonial Naval Defence Act to 1865, which would ultimately lead to the adoption of the flag. The updated version of that page here, is clarified a bit better; the aforementioned act empowered colonies to provide, maintain and use vessels of war, requiring that said vessels would fly a Blue Ensign with the Seal or Badge of the Colony in the fly and a Blue Pennant. However the seal was only created by a proclamation of the Governor on the 4th of February 1870, with the flag created following that and first flying on the 10th of February 1870. Explicitly referred to there as the inauguration of the new flag.Number36 (talk) 21:43, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, well there's been no counter-arguments, and I think the above is straight forward so I'll update the article.Number36 (talk) 20:34, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  1865 should be 1870?