Talk:Common Language Runtime

message: Hi all, I'm a little surprised by the statement that over 40 programming languages are now supported by the Microsoft CLR;  at first I was thinking maybe somebody thought it was referring to human languages rather than programming languages.  But, with the many lesser known & specialty programming languages out there, this value of "> 40" might just be true... Does anybody have a reference to support this estimate? - Harris7 17:13, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Just for completeness: Microsoft .NET Languages - Mark Hurd 04:31, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: clr

message: As noted in the article, the CLR is MS's implementation of the CLI spec.  The article on the CLI gives details about the technology.  This article should remain short, and serve largely to provide an informatitive redirect to the other.  Leotohill 03:13, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article should remain short 

message: I'm having a problem with CLR == Microsoft's implementation of the CLI. In the Mono article, we have: 
Mono is a project led by Novell (formerly by Ximian) to create an ECMA standard compliant .NET compatible set of tools, including among others a C# compiler and a Common Language Runtime.
  So is it the Mono article that is wrong or this one? If CLR is microsoft's implementation of a runtime for CLI, it can't be Mono's too.   66.130.179.31 04:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CLR: Microsoft's implementation or standard?

message: but it doesn't much that version. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Common_Language_Runtime&oldid=53946705  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.132.81.63 (talk) 19:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's said that the record is from 18/05/2006 

message: This article is very surprisingly very small.
There is so much more i want to know.
There is also a version 4 coming up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.64.35.91 (talk) 12:30, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please update this article. 

message: The article says "The CLR allows programmers to ignore many details of the specific CPU that will execute the program", but not what details, or why, or compared to what other environments (which don't allow me to ignore these unspecified details?).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.232.11.50 (talk) 15:43, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What can I ignore, and why? 

message: I believe that Clojure (as "ClojureCLR") has been implemented for the Common Language Runtime. Should it not feature in the list of languages? UnknownSage (talk) 16:25, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clojure? 

message: The external link to "Components of CLR" is broken.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AngryElephant (talk • contribs) 10:59, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Link 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Common Language Runtime. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110425220519/http://www.visualbuilder.com/dotnet/tutorial/clr-%28common-language-runtime%29/ to http://www.visualbuilder.com/dotnet/tutorial/clr-%28common-language-runtime%29/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:25, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified