lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dance ensemble

message: Dance ensemble is the same as Dance troupe
Maybe is better making a redirect to that article, instead of "You may want to read Wiktionary's entry on "dance ensemble" instead.", which by the way do not exists! --109.53.244.231 (talk) 08:34, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dance ensemble and Dance troupe 
Talk:Dipodium punctatum

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Dipodium punctatum portrait.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on April 12, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-04-12. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:22, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Dipodium punctatum portrait.jpg]]
Talk:Tournament selection

message: The pseudo code seems wrong. It should be:
choose k (the tournament size) individuals from the population at random
select the best of the k individuals
The statement "The chosen individual can be removed from the population that the selection is made from 
if desired, otherwise individuals can be selected more than once for the next generation" is wrong. 
For a population of size n, there are n tournaments. If the selected individual is removed from the 
population, then by the time the nth tournament has been run, there will be n - n individuals who have 
not been selected. At that point there is no actual selection happening.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.15.40.22 (talk) 21:50, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The pseudo code

message: If you do the mathematics you will find that either k has to be 0 or that p has to be 1. This doesn't seem right.
--Astenorh (talk) 13:36, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, there's a (1-p)^k probability that none of the k participants is selected.  This could be solved by saying that the worst individual is always selected with a probability of (1-p)^(k-1), or dividing all the probabilities by 1-(1-p)^k.  In any case, a clarification is needed. 138.100.74.81 (talk) 08:27, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Mathematically wrong
Talk:Radio Borders

message: mmm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.242.250.144 (talk) 22:05, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

message: * Radio Borders was a full service station with a unique and respected history, GHR has no local shows, just local news and travel, hardly a radio station. 2A02:C7C:CB67:FD00:A416:FB15:54F9:1B92 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 17:26, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Split and merge
Talk:Hourly worker

message: A Google search mostly turns up links to the HR policies of various employers, so there's plenty of mention of the term and it's definition, but I didn't find a whole lot of material that would necessarily be good sources. I may try to look again later, or dig through the local library. Triona (talk) 12:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible starting places for reference
Talk:MFR (radio station)

message: The article states that MFR Two broadcasts automated music outside of its specialist programming hours.  However http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showpost.php?p=55560085&postcount=28 seems to suggest that this is the case for the DAB feed only and that MFR Two on AM simulcasts the FM feed at that time.  Can anyone from the MFR transmission area confirm what the case is? 82.25.171.232 (talk) 21:05, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  MFR Two
Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Melbourne/9

message: Now that the time and date has been finalised, I would be super-grateful if someone could spam the email/talk page of those who agreed to be spammed, to let them know. We also should get that geo-watchlist-alert thingy going for this week. Anyone know how that works? pfctdayelise (talk) 12:38, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:West Sound (Ayrshire)

message: I’ve Attempted to move West Sound Ayrshire to Greatest Hits Radio Ayrshire. I’ve discovered you cannot move a page, that’s been already been redirected. I’m trying to find how to request a move, but not having any luck or success. Please help me.~~~_ DoctorStrange97 (talk) 14:05, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Better to create a new Page for Greatest Hits Ayrshire and the old page for West Sound can relate back to the legacy station’s history. Gordonrox (talk) 17:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  West Sound (Ayrshire) 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks (contribs) 00:36, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: West Sound (Ayrshire) →  – The Radio station has changed its name from April 3, 2023 at 6 am DoctorStrange97 (talk) 14:44, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Radio Stations has been notified of this discussion. EpicPupper (talk) 15:09, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 April 2023
Talk:Finders Keepers (disambiguation)

message: I removed the entry for the Sunday Times contest because it is not mentioned in the Sunday Times article. Disambiguation pages disambiguate Wikipedia, not everything in the world. If you would like to add a mention of the contest to the Sunday Times article (preferably with a citation), then it can be listed on the dab page.--ShelfSkewed Talk 12:52, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sunday Times contest
Talk:Sapera

message: Something is seriously wrong with this article, a sapera is a snake charmer, I came to this page from snake charmer, which said that saperas are a caste... but this page says sapera is a dance, which I being Indian am unaware of!!! :-O also, romani people are european gypsies, nothing to do with Indian folk saperas!!! Lilaac (talk) 02:42, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something wrong with this article
Talk:Type 26 frigate

message: How does this article not contain a single mention of the fact that at least 6 members of the class (if not many more) will have the Aegis Combat System? 45.26.61.142 (talk) 22:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The Hunter class will have an Aegis combat management computer but wont use an Aegis radar instead using an Australian indigenous design as well as a SAAB 9LV tactical interface, as ‘Aegis’ is a whole package system of integrated weapon, radar and tactical management its not a real Aegis system. WatcherZero (talk) 02:38, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aegis
Talk:Underwood, Markham

message: As of right now, this article is a confusion of two places - a little-known neighbourhood in Markham and a village in Bruce County near Saugeen Shores, that I can see on my Ontario map.  I don't see a need for an article for the Markham neighbourhood. PKT (talk) 13:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sharpenhoe

message: Or, rarely, does it exist outside of any parish?
2602:304:CDA6:51B0:10B7:93C9:4263:8C99 (talk) 03:40, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Located in which parish? 
Talk:Bruck an der Leitha

message: Between 1918 an 1938 Bruck was part of Lower Austria, under German rule part of "Niederdonau", and since 1945 again part of Lower Austria. Bruckneudorf, the neighbouring village, was part of Hungary since 1866 (before that year hungary was not a seperate "state" in the Austrian Empire), then named "Királyhida" which means "Königsbrücke" ("King´s bridge"). From 1919 to 1921 Bruckneudorf was part of Hungary, from 1921 to 1938 of "Burgenland", from 1938 to 1945 of "Niederdonau" and since 1945 part of the re-installed "Burgenland"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.19.32.16 (talk) 08:11, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Talk:X3: Terran Conflict

message: I agree this article should be deleted. Not much information has been released about this game and so most of this information is speculation. There is mention of it in X (computer game series).Xenon_Slayer (talk) 13:37, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Incorrect, all of the information on the page is contained within the press release. ---Trekie9001 (talk) 21:24, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *One issue of the PROD is resolved already (the 'official release' source shows it's supported); and I just resolved the other. I found numerous independent sites reporting on this development, therefore it is notable; I have just added a few as references to establish notability. So the issues are now resolved, and the given grounds for deletion are no longer valid. The Zig (talk) 16:52, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion Of This Article

message: A teaser video for X3: Terran Conflict was announced in the 5 March 2008 X-Universe News newsletter. The newsletter can be viewed here. Cctoide (talk) 22:45, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: X3 Newsletter report

message: Someone seems to have forgotten to rename a page correctly. There was a few changes between X3 and X³ and when attempting to edit the mainpage you are instead sent to the redirect page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.217.188.31 (talk) 21:28, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved pages problem

message: "But since Gabe Newell (President & Co-founder of Steam) announced the loss of third party DRM from steam, this has been fixed (although not yet as of 24th July 2009)."
Okay, first off, I've never heard of Newell saying that.  If he did, cite it.  Second, what's the point of saying "This has been fixed (Oh no, it hasn't)".  I just checked, and indeed, the steam page reports the 5 machine limit is still in there.  Egosoft themselves have announced they're removing the copy protection in their next patch, but there's no announced date for that yet.  Anyway, I'm taking the whole ridiculous sentence out.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.248.161.72 (talk) 05:02, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: DRM what?
Talk:Böheimkirchen

message: Hello, the dates in the infobox will be shown wrong. I corrected at the date 2015 and shown will be 2014. Who can correct the dates of all Municipalities in the district of Sankt Pölten-Land please? Thanks and regards -- Sweepy (talk) 07:30, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who can help? 
Talk:Ministry of Textiles

message: I propose to merge Minister of Textiles into this article since there is not enough content. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 21:13, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:List of symphonies by number

message: I'm not quite sure what purpose this page serves... it seems quite repetative as well. Perhaps it would be better to have a page listing numbers of symphonies composed by different composers, sortable by their date (era?) and number, rather than making fairly generic statements about compositional tendencies. --EvanCortens (talk) 14:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose

message: See discussion I initiated at Template talk:Symphonies by number and name#Disambiguation pages?. --Francis Schonken (talk) 11:15, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symphony No. [X] pages
Talk:Red River Jig

message: Should "First Nations" be included, as it is in the opening paragraph of the article? I post this here from a series of edits (removed , reinstated , and three more back-and-forths), which ended up discussed on an IP talk page, where it was suggested by another user  that discussion be moved to the talk page here. From the editor's talk page discussion:
*From :You need to remove the fake entry no reference to any existing jigs of first nation people. You keep adding in fake info . Show your reference to a native American indian jig ?
*From :The first reference in the Red River Jig article is to Ethnologies, and the article titled "The Social Poetics of the Red River Jig in Alberta and Beyond". And the very first sentence in the Abstract is "The Red River Jig is a fiddle tune and a dance form that have particular resonance for First Nations and Métis peoples in Northern and Western Canada."   signed, Willondon (talk)  02:31, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of First Nations in article
Talk:Pyrantel

message: Pyrantel pamoate looks like a salt of pyrantel, and a common drug form form for pyrantel. Should the 2 articles be merged, possibly? --Djadjko (talk) 23:42, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pyrantel pamoate
Talk:Showbiz Central

message: It seems that the tone of this article is somehow unencylcopedic, ie. "Showbiz Central brings the hard-hitting news, hard-core showbiz issues straight to your homes!" and "In order to get the hottest and freshest news items about your favorite local celebrities, Showbiz Central's Star Trail follows the stars!". It looks like a catchphrase from the TV show itself which can be quoted or paraphrased to meet Wikipedia's quality of standard. I find it more of an unencyclopedic tone rather than an overly promotional tone, so I suggest a cleanup for this article. Vekou (talk) 02:42, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unencyclopedic Tone
Talk:Morro de São Paulo

message: I've just removed almost half of this page. Too many weasel words, the article was looking like an advertising! I think the person who did all that can't tell Wikipedia and Wikitravel apart. I only didn't remove everything because I would have to blank the page. It would be great if anyone could improve this article (or in orther words remove all content and rewrite it completely) until it reaches Wiipedia quality standarts. For me, this article only doesn't deserve a PROD (or even a db-spam) because it's about a notable place. Victao lopes (talk) 14:50, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please, stop adding those links to "pousadaamarro". This is spam, and that's not allowed at Wiki. Once you add this link, it'll be removed, and you'll be warned, so don't waste your time, kid. Victao lopes (talk) 13:34, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is anybody watching this article??
Talk:Sibonga

message: Surely an article about Sibonga should have a section on this well-known Christian shrine and pilgrimage place. 222.101.209.145 (talk) 12:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simala shrine 
Talk:Siege of Baler

message: consider reading also this book since there are some discrepancies noted in this article versus the said publication. The are more details about the siege that may be worth considering. kalibkib (talk) 01:58, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flames Over Baler by Carlos Madrid 

message: there is no need to show the american troops as combatants, all they did was to TRY to save the spaniards but it was the filipinos vs the spanish in this siege--EuroHistoryTeacher (talk) 21:02, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S. involment? 

message: Anybody who understands Spanish who wants to cross-fertilize both articles? See :es:Sitio de Baler. --seav (talk) 03:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanish version of the article is extensive 

message: I've moved this section here.
Per WP:MOS#Article titles, the word Seige should have a lower-case s. I would have changed that, but the text of this section is so badly garbled that I've just moved the whole section here instead. Please de-garble it before moving it back. -- Boracay Bill (talk) 00:39, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved section ''After the Seige'' here 

message: The Filipino flag in the article's box is wrong. As the Philipines were at war, the red band should be on top, not the blue!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.155.211.67 (talk) 21:19, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong flag! 

message: I quote from the article: 
"... and then in November, Captain Las Morenas succumbed to beriberi. Command fell to Lt. Saturnino Martín Cerezo when Las Morenas died in December."
When did Las Morenas die? One sentence says Las Morenas died in November and the next sentence says he died in December.  Anagnorisis 12:49, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: 23 November, according to pages 52-53 here, although those are not the pages cited in that source. The other cited sources are not available for perusal online; I don't know what they say. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 13:19, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: The caption of the lead photo of this article caught my eye. It's apparently been in the article for some time, and it reads: "Filipino troops of Colonel Tecson in Baler, May 1899. Tecson is to the right of the cannon, Novicio to the left." With this caption it seems reasonable that the article ought to explain who Colonel Tecson is, but it does not. I dug around a bit online and didn't find much; there is , but it's not previewable online. Could someone please fix this? Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 15:56, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simón Ocampo Tecson (more info needed)
Talk:Rose Township, Oakland County, Michigan

message: The dot indicating Rose Township's location is wrong, Oakland County is in south eastern MI, it currently indicates Ogemaw County as the location of Rose Township  Quickone (talk) 14:58, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed this, somehow the infoboxes for this article were in Rose Lake Township, Michigan, while that township's infobox was in Rose Township, Ogemaw County, Michigan. older ≠ wiser 01:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Multinational Division Central-South

message: I feel that this edit, while updating a few things, also removed a lot of useful information.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  16:46, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Update?

message: I am not sure if the Division still exists? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  02:02, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Status
Talk:Static timing analysis

message: This article is heavily biased towards timing analysis in integrated circuits.  "Timing analysis" is an important part of software development.  Real-time systems, embedded systems, multimedia applications are examples of software systems where timing analysis is important.  If this article is only about integrated circuits the name should reflect this.  Pgr94 (talk) 14:59, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Integrated circuits only?

message: Define what a corner is, please.
71.139.161.30 (talk) 17:11, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corners
Talk:107th Street station

message: This article would almost seem to define lack of notability.  What's next?  Every bus stop?  On the other hand, if that floats someone's boat, who cares? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.34.28.215 (talk • contribs) 08:05, February 23, 2009
:It's a railroad station. It's automatically notable. Somebody else raised the same stink over Tri-Rail stations in Florida. ----DanTD (talk) 14:43, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?
Talk:WWNN

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for a Fibre Channel storage networking technology is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the storage networking technology. - Dravecky (talk) 00:17, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page

message: Current discussion at Draft talk:WRBD on whether this should be split from WWNN. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split proposal: WRBD
Talk:Israeli–Palestinian conflict/Records

message: *Splendid. There is a consensus among active editors to this article, Jaakobou, Nickh, and Pedro Gonnet, to delete the phrase as seen by both sides from the sentence Core issues in the conflict as seen by both sides are the future of the remaining Israeli settlements built in the occupied territories, .... (emphasis added) (Several other active editors may be read as having given tacit acceptance, including Ceedjee, Durova, Nishidani, SJMNY, Sm8900.) 
*It is my view, which need not engender further discussion, that the consensus reflects an understanding that: (a) 'occupied/occupation' territories is terminology used by most mainstream sources and sufficiently encyclopedic. (b) Such terminology may not be suitable in certain narrow situations, though, e.g., when paraphrasing a particular viewpoint, including the Israeli view. (c) The terminology clearly may be needed to describe aspects of the conflict, as in this case, but it shouldn't be used excessively in articles (e.g., when geographic terms are adequate). 
*As a matter of good faith editing, editors who accept this consensus are expected to consistently apply and support this consensus wherever there is a question about 'occupied/occupation' terminology regarding the Isr-Pal situation. The consensus may not reflect your preferred choice, but acceptance means (as stated above) you would not contest the edit and even help restore if it gets disrupted (absent further consensus). 
:As a favor to me and my effort here, active editors are requested to join the new WikiProject set up to promote cooperation among editors on Isr-Pal topics. By joining, you would be affirming the Project but not making any specific time commitment. Thanks very much for your cooperation and patience here. HG | Talk 15:52, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Occupied terminology 

message: Considerable discussion and effort went into the drafting of the current introduction. These have been archived here. It is assumed that as this was a consensus effort, these archives will be read before any serious edits/discussions take place. Suicup (talk) 07:18, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction
Talk:WSRF (AM)

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for a family of OASIS-published specifications for web services is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the specifications. - Dravecky (talk) 01:03, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:Voice of change

message: I have made some small changes to this entry inorder to remove the charge of bias against the author. I also included a reference to the groups site so it is no longer unauthenticated. I also note that the charge of disputed copyright has been delt with by a statement from the original arthor who has said it his own work, which I think we must accept. 
This now appears to be an accurate entry with references which I feel Wiki will have no reason to delete.
I have made some small changes to this entry inorder to remove the charge of bias against the author. I also included a reference to the groups site so it is no longer unauthenticated. I also note that the charge of disputed copyright has been delt with by a statement from the original arthor who has said it his own work, which I think we must accept.
As for the suggestion that an internal group of a political party, is not worthy of a seprate entry, please see 'The Monday Club' (Tory party) and 'Tribune' (Labour party). 
This now appears to be an accurate entry with references which I feel Wiki will have no reason to delete.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.40.248.70 (talk) 15:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Constitution of the Republic of Texas

message: Hey Texans get off your duffs give this article the time it deserves. The state has awesome history but you would not know it by looking at this page. No sources and still a stub. Time to Mess with Texas and Git R Done.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.40.234 (talk) 06:23, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time for some attention to this article.