lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Suresh Luthra

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 15:39, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition
Talk:Index of racism-related articles

message: There is a merger proposal present on this page to bring List of types of racism into this article.
:Opposed. I think the topic of List of types of racism is valid and relevant and necessary to separate from racism-related topics. Nobody has discussed this proposal in the 3 months the tag has been on the page; I will remove it if there's no further discussion within a week. - Freechild 04:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  A week... several months - close enough.  Removing tag.  (oh, and I agree) --ShakataGaNai (talk) 06:27, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: An RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 16:47, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC 
Talk:Interstate 59 in Mississippi

message: Any comments or questions regarding I-59 in La. or Miss. are now welcomed. --Bdj95 05:01, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, talk pages on Wikipedia are intended to discuss the article – ways to improve the article, clarifications when the text is unclear, that sort of thing.  It's not for general questions about the subject. -- NORTH talk 18:05, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: About six months ago, this article was created, combining the two states because there is very little in Louisiana. NE2 recently made the companion Interstate 59 in Alabama and Georgia; I-59 is similarly short in Georgia. Scott5114 then decided that this was a bad idea, and moved them to cover Mississippi and Alabama only, arguing that the other states can be covered in Interstate 59. NE2 disagrees, saying that it makes sense to be consistent and cover all four states in subpages.
I think I agree with Scott.  His idea is the most consistent and practical.  If a particular state's stretch of interstate highway is long enough and / or important enough to warrant its own article then of course it should get one.  Sometimes just one city's stretch of interstate is important enough to justify its own article (like Atanta's Downtown Connector, for instance).  But if a state (or a city) interstate's features can be summed up, substantially, in one or two paragraphs then I should think it could be covered in the parent article (in this case Interstate 59).  Berberry (talk) 19:54, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope: should Louisiana and Mississippi be combined?
Talk:Svend Karlsen

message: I changed "Scandinavian" to "Nordic", as the reference was to Iceland, which is not in Scandinavia... so there Robin J Thomson (talk) 17:10, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  change
Talk:List of ambassadors of the United States to Spain

message: Concerning Bonsal et Culbertson, 1946 to 51, there could be an explicative note stating why they where Chargé d'Affaires and not ambassador (even if factually, they were in power) : due to the UN Resolution of the 12 december 1946, there was no official diplomatic representation in Franco's Spain  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.13.134.192 (talk) 18:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information
Talk:Iron Mountain (Los Angeles County)

message: I don't mean to be overly nitpicky, but not a heck of a lot of rock climbing/technical skill is required for either of the two primary routes (or nearly any other route) on Iron. The trail (maintained by folks I know) from Iron to Baldy has a 3rd class section (Gunsight Notch). It being class 3, requiring no special technical skills.
Also, the Heaton Flat Trail (South Ridge, primary route, etc) IS maintained. I do not believe there is any authority that maintains it (ala San Gabriel Mountain Trailbuilders), but many of us who are up there often cut branches and move stuff around respectfully to keep the trail clear. Some years it gets a bit thick, but we always clean it up.
I would also state that this is a class 2 route, as it requires hands at some points, such as during the section north of Allison Saddle.
10-12 hours is pretty slow. A fit party should be able to make it to the summit in 3-4 hours, and back down in 3/4 of that time. Some friends of mine does it in 2:30, but that's obviously not the norm.
There are other summits, or points I should say, in the SGM that are harder to reach. Triplet Rocks is no slouch, especially from the south. Some of the peaks in the "Mermaid Massif" area (IE Pk 3702 "Little Mermaid") are arguably harder class 1-3 hikes than Iron, despite being a lower elevation.
Anywho, I felt it was more appropriate to discuss this and basically ask permission to make changes.
Cheers
TacoDelRio 08:43, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to Iron Mountain 8007
Talk:As Friends Rust

message: This article reads like it was written by someone who took a crash-course in English as a Second Language.  Almost every sentence needs to be completely re-written.  I don't know enough about this band to do so, so if someone literate comes along... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.171.33.161 (talk) 05:16, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:People of the Konkan Division

message: The reason for the creation of this page is explained here:
Talk:Konkani_people#Ambiguity_in_Title
The user who added this tag has a personal grudge against Konkani people and has also made a PA againt me anonymously--Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 05:18, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made no PAs. Infact, Deepak himself has attacked me personally by saying I have grudges against Konkani people. This article was deleted once, but still Deepak has created it, just because of his seperatist ideology.Please delete it as the matter is already covered in Konkani people and there is no such thing as "People of the Konkan Division". Konkancho Wagh 14:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article was delted in the first instance because it had no content, just one line. and it was deleted before I could make any additions. --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 05:12, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoa, whoa - you guys have a content dispute here, not a speedy deletion argument.  If you want this page deleted, the file a regular AFD and argue it there.  Don't use the speedy deletion process for this.  --Haemo 03:53, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. This chap is using Wikipedia to satisfy his biases. Can this speedy deletion tag be removed. I cannot remove it since I created the article. --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 04:57, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks!--Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 04:54, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Do not delete

message: Dawood keskar is NOT notable. He is merely notorious. Not to be included in this list.
Was Ambedkar from konkan?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.217.93.202 (talk) 03:04, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable people
Talk:Rawls College of Business

message: Someone at the HOM program created a nearly unreferenced, WP:N-failing stub about their program.  I've merged it into this article, where it belongs, and will set up a redirect here.  BTW, I think that having a similar paragraph about each of the major programs would benefit this article; it's more informative than the existing list.  If anyone finds any more stubs, or can add a few sentences about a program, I think that would be a significant improvement to the encyclopedic nature of the article.  Thanks.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:40, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: HOM

message: Here's the link to the archived list of degrees offered. It doesn't belong in the article but could still be used to develop it. NThomas (talk) 02:19, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Degrees offered
Talk:Oscar Chajes

message: America's Chess Heritage confirms most of the details in this article, so I added it as a reference.  Korn says that Chajes died in Berlin, but the article says NYC.  Do we know which is correct? Quale 05:27, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about place of death

message: I have tried my best to find biographical information on Oscar. There is very little out there about his life beyond the games of chess. Kingturtle = (talk) 15:15, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oscar Chajes is an enigma
Talk:Egg Island (The Bahamas)

message: The reference to Egg Island as where Columbus may have landed is in error; if a Royal Island, Bahamas stub is created, this fact should be moved over to that page. I live 20 miles from both these islands, and they've been confused in academic and navigational texts for centuries, although it's not clear when or why this mistake originated. As can be easily confirmed using Google Earth, Royal Island is an east-west island which is five miles long, has a large, natural harbor, and is surrounded by reefs (as per Columbus' description of Guanahani in the relevant Wikipedia article). In contrast, Egg Island is a small, round island adjacent to Royal Island which has no harbor of any kind, is not surrounded by reefs on any side, and which is separated from Royal Island by a narrow channel. This corrected attribution of Molander pointing to Royal Island is confirmed by Robert Carr's discussion of Royal Island on page 7 of the July 1991 publication "An Archaeological Survey of Spanish Wells and Northern Eleuthera, Bahamas (Bahamas A.H.C. Technical Report #1"). Thewumpus (talk) 15:55, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Fansipan

message: I'm off to Sa Pa tonight to climb the mountain over the next couple of days. I'll try to get some photos which can be used in the article. 125.235.96.130 05:30, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: From which language is the peak's name derived? It's clearly not Vietnamese. Notation about this would be helpful. 72.130.134.99 (talk) 05:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Elías Piña Province

message: The last Dominican census was in 2002 and these are the official population figures for the country and de communities. If you are going to put an estimate for another year from a reliable source, please put the reference.  tends to put imaginary figures, even for small islands that are not inhabited. And the flag in the template is under serious doubts so take the flag out or do not use the template. --Jmarcano (talk) 00:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population figures 
Talk:Ladipo Solanke

message: Was he the first person to broadcast in Yoruba ever, or just in England? howcheng  {chat} 05:32, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The ODNB article used as a reference doesn't qualify it, so I don't see any reason why it would only apply to England.  The early date, appearing to precede any radio broadcasting in West Africa, lends credence to the ODNB's claim. Warofdreams talk 12:33, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Yoruba
Talk:Tas Pappas

message: Is he even still pro? 99DBSIMLR 13:23, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As of August 2014, he is sponsored, but is technically not a professional skateboarder.--Soulparadox (talk) 14:28, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: May 2007

message: I actually PROD'd this for deletion thinking there was no way we could build an article without major WP:BLP violations. But having gone through the available sources, there's actually more than enough to substantiate an article and so I've rewritten it, effectively from scratch. This is an obvious case of WP:NOTTEMP, though an argument could be made that he's well on his way to being currently notable again anyway. Stalwart111 00:17, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, if anyone reading this has a copy of Issue #185 of SLAM Skateboarding Magazine (December 2011), please let me know. Stalwart111 00:54, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-write, December 2012

message: It would be a significant improvement to this article if anybody with records of the competitions to add in details of dates, locations, results etc.
Much of the information here so far has been gleaned from the World Cup Skating archive but that only goes back to 1999. Ideallly, somebody with old Vert almanacs would do well to complete this section.
Jamesmcdonaldmidfield (talk) 16:56, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, would be great. I posted a similar request here about the same thing. Happy to talk to anyone about how we might cite such sources if they can be found. Stalwart111 23:21, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have included content since articles have been published after the release of the documentary, but there are still no substantial sources for the contest section unfortunately.--Soulparadox (talk) 14:28, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Competition date and results clarification 

message: I have removed the birth date and have left the year, as the latter can be verified with media articles published this year. The citation tags for the birth date were over one year old, so it seemed appropriate; however, please reinstate the date if new sources are published.--Soulparadox (talk) 14:28, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date
Talk:Tea Donguzashvili

message: Please explain why this article shouldn't show Template:EC Judo W Open, having its subject winning the competiton 2006. Deancarmeli (talk) 12:53, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template:EC Judo W Open]]
Talk:Roundup (issue tracker)

message: Personally I found this web page valuable as it provides a short and concise summary of the design features of Roundup. I've added links to the issue tracker comparison page (and cross-referenced from there).
Hgibson 06:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Personally

message: Yes, it is open source; yes, it can be used for free (which is no necessarily the case for open source software). Ok, most will tend to assume an open source software to be available for free...
"Designed to be highly customizable" is fairly neutral, isn't it? Despite in my opinion it is a fact that it is highly customizable (never said there couldn't be another issue tracker equally or even more customizable, and this wording is doesn't imply anything like that either). "Designed to be customizable" is far too weak IMO; it definitely is customizable (and the article tells how). --Tobias 21:20, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no problems with the current formulation, thanks for improving it. -- intgr 23:22, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open source vs. free; customizablity level 

message: I took the liberty of removing the notability tag again.  The fact that a server operating system like Debian Linux ships Roundup on their DVD set generally indicates that a piece of server software is notable.  Cheers, --unforgettableid | how's my driving? 02:24, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The primary notability criterion states: "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.". As you can see, this has nothing to do with Debian or DVD sets. -- intgr [talk] 01:31, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed notability tag again
Talk:Ted Elliott (umpire)

message: Just going by Trove "hits", Elliott should be listed as "Ned" rather than "Ted", as it is clear that was how he was known in life. (in the decade 1880-89 8 hits v. 1); it's not until 1920-29 that "Ted" comes close (4 v. 2). However neither matches "Edward" at 33 in 1880-89 and 7 in 1920-29.
Oh, and "Hudspith" is just plain wrong. Doug butler (talk) 10:17, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ted or Ned?
Talk:Ted Phillips

message: I removed the "Controversy" section which had no direct or sourced claims towards Philips. In one sentence, Philips is blamed for not doing anything about the state of Soldier Field. Later in the section, the article affirmed that Soldier Field is not managed by the Chicago Bears but rather the Chicago Park District. The section goes to blast Phillips for not re-signing Olin Kreutz,  though the source givens never actually holds Philips accountable. If the section should be re-added, it must contain actual reliable sources that criticize Phillips and specify exact wrongdoings --  StarScream1007  ►Talk   01:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Controversy section
Talk:Falmouth, Jamaica

message: Should a section about the Luminous Lagoon appear here? 142.39.230.100 (talk) 19:43, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

message: I added an image of the town but wondered whether we could get something a little bit more up to date? Leutha (talk) 09:34, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Teijiro Tanikawa

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Steveozone (talk) 01:03, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problem removed
Talk:GE-600 series

message: How much physical memory could it handle?  How fast was it? ★NealMcB★ (talk) 16:02, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Specs on memory, cpu frequency, etc?

message: HONEYWELL is NOT a PERSON!! the corect word is WHICH and not WHO because who is used only for persons! Sofia Koutsouveli 2005 (talk) 05:34, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: By gosh, you're right. Peter Flass (talk) 11:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Honeywell is not a person
Talk:Terry Brands

message: That link doesn't exist anymore and unfortunately I don't know how to edit wiki.
By the way, does anyone know where I can get the clip of Terry and Tom training weights and stadiums, etc.  I saw it a while back and can't find it anywhere. 68.204.115.22 20:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terry and Tom Brands Video
Talk:Terry Hill

message: Following the death of the subject, could an editor with better knowledge of the policy on non-free content be able to advise on how best to include a fair-use/copywrited image? I've found the policy and enforcement of this very hard to get my head around, so I usually steer clear. Storm machine (talk) 06:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death and non-free image
Talk:Whalen v. Roe

message: Unfortunately, the original version of this article appears to have been copied verbatim from the Oyez Project at http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1976/1976_75_839, which is licensed under a noncommercial Creative Commons license that is incompatible with Wikipedia. In its current state, this article is composed almost entirely of copyvio text. Even the "Holding" section of the infobox appears to derive from Oyez. In accordance with Wikipedia's policy on non-free content and the accepted procedure for dealing with copyright problems of this nature, I am removing the offending text, leaving only those parts which were written by later contributors and do not derive from the copyrighted source. Regrettably, this leaves only a small stub. —Caesura(t) 01:21, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Tetsuhiko Asai

message: Done. I confirmed his kanji name by this page. --Nightshadow28 15:15, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese script 

message: Sensei Asai is 10 dan.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.103.52.195 (talk) 01:04, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asai 10 dan 

message: Does anyone know who the 'notable student' Thomas Preston is? A search for 'Thomas Preston karate' brought me no useful results, and I have never heard of him unlike the others of Asai's listed followers, who are all very well known for continuing Asai's legacy.
I found this guy of the same name, but it states he practiced shotokan in Nagoya not Tokyo, under a Mabuchi Sensei, and he seems much better known as a swordsman than a karateka: http://kendomuenchen.de/thomas-preston-biographie-profil-lehrer/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enreh (talk • contribs) 06:46, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Students
Talk:Single-phase electric power

message: 1. how to calculate grain?
2. what is duplet structure?
3. what is three tecmique to calculate grain boundries?
4. solid state windspeed and wind direction data logger  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.238.8.90 (talk) 12:12, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Perhaps that  the image to the right can be added to this article ? Also, an image of 3-phase windings should be shown (and perhaps 2-phase windings) so that it is clear what the differences in phases mean to the construction of an engine.
91.182.255.53 (talk) 14:43, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, way past WP:UNDUE. The only way this diagram could justify itself would be in a detailed article on induction motors, to the level of the article it was taken from. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Single phase motor wiring

message: There are only two ways of obtaining a single phase supply from a three phase transformer (distribution or otherwise). Connection from phase to neutral (if the transformer has a neutral available) or between two phases. [User:Tim@] has twice edited in an irrelevant qualification, "(without conversion)" into the third paragraph of the article, linking to an article about AC or DC to AC or DC conversion. This is out of place because the paragraph is specifically about obtaining the single phase supply from a three phase transformer of which there are precisely the two methods mentioned and no other. Using a converter in between is not obtaining the single phase supply from a three phase transformer, but from somewhere else which may be powered by the transformer.
In fact the entire paragraph is out of place in the lede because it is not mentioned in the main body of the article (the lede is a summary of the rest of the article). 109.152.184.169 (talk) 12:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single phase supply from three phase transformer.
Talk:Automatic stay

message: does the stay apply to?  7, 11, 13, all of them?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.242.72.225 (talk) 20:18, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which chapters... 

message: One of these external links appears to just be an add for a law firm, am I right?  This can't be okay with Wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.55.52.202 (talk) 16:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Link