lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Komsomolsky

message: If Komsomolsky is masculine, Komsomolskoye neuter and Komsomolskaya feminine, why does every link points to Komsomolsky and not Komsomolskoye that its neuter?? Just a tought. Khullah 05:27, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because masculine is considered the main form.  Also, it is easier to consolidate links this way—not every adjective would have links to as many articles as this one does.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 05:39, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Patrode

message: Its not a "How to" Article. It is an article on a very famous dish in karnataka. I really don;t understand why somebody marked this for speedy deletion. The article was created by self without copying from any website. And this page was created because there was no such page in wikipedia. --Crazysoul 05:36, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I did notice his rant on your talk page when I went there purely by accident. I had gone there to check if there was an entry there on Mangalore appearing on the wiki main page. Articles on dishes like patrode are very much required on wikipedia, much like Swedish meatballs or Egg foo young.--PremKudvaTalk 06:56, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Patrode

message: After a serious discussion over a youtube video, someone tactffully changed the reference from 'Tulunad' to 'Malnadu', Please rectify this. 2400:3C00:1:A102:DF00:0:0:217 (talk) 06:48, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone changed the reference from 'Tulunadu' to 'Malnadu'. Please rectify this.
Talk:Missale Aboense

message: This article seems to be identical, word for word, as the entry in Virtual Finland http://virtual.finland.fi/netcomm/news/showarticle.asp?intNWSAID=27057 under Missale Aboense.  Would an attribution one way ot the other be in order.  Is Virtual Finland plagiarising Wikipedia?
LookingGlass (talk) 22:57, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism of Wikipedia?
Talk:James Bab

message: Most of the minigun articles I've read, such as the GAU-17 and the M61 Vulcan state that six barrels is the norm. So -- eight? 
-- • Kurt Guirnela • ‡ Talk 01:30, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have corrected the number for tomas' version. I counted seven. Six barrels could be because to give the breechblock time and space to align the next catridge into position. The original Vulcan guns liked those used in The Last Samurai) actually has eight barrels. It's not too farfetched to build vulcans with at least nine barrels.Eaglestorm 03:29, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Gatling Gun of the 1860's (of The Last Samurai vintage) definitely had six barrels. See Gatling Gun M1865. Vulcans (which are the modern weapons) maybe, yes would have theoretically more barrels, but the old Gatlings had only six. -- • Kurt Guirnela • ‡ Talk 03:50, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eight barrels?
Talk:Azadi Stadium

message: I've seen the capacity stated on this page change a fair bit between edits. Some say 90,00 and others say 100,000
Which is the correct one, as the link I checked was Persian with no real hint of the official capacity
--81.131.91.194 (talk) 20:55, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the capacity? 

message: Azadi Stadium is the main venue of the 2015 Women's Islamic Games.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by FallandSpringOlympics (talk • contribs) 23:01, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Azadi Stadium as Main Venue 

message: The capacity of this stadium is 75.091 seats. The source for the 95.225 seats (http://www.teammelli.com/articlesarchived/azadi-stadium/) is not mentioned and also too old (not after 2013, see last paragraph "It will be also decreased to near 75,000 which stadium is set to have another round of renovations in summer 2013" ). Das popular Show 90 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navad) wanted to know the answer to this question on 17 March 2015 (here the clip: http://www.dalfak.com/w/g6mc1/%DA%AF%D9%86%D8%AC%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B4-%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%82%D8%B9%DB%8C-%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%B2%D8%B4%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%87-%D8%A2%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%AF%DB%8C-%DA%86%D9%82%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%9F, here the lines http://90tv.ir/news/77210/%DA%AF%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%B4-%D9%88%DB%8C%DA%98%D9%87-%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%B2%D8%B4%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%87-%D8%A2%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%AF%DB%8C-100-%D9%87%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D9%86%D9%81%D8%B1%DB%8C-%D9%86%DB%8C%D8%B3%D8%AA-%D8%A8%D9%87-%D8%A8%D9%87%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%87-%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B2-%D8%A7%D9%88%D9%84%DB%8C%D9%86-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B2%DB%8C-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%B2%D8%B4%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%87-%D8%A2%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%AF%DB%8C-%D8%AF%D8%B1-27-%D8%A7%D8%B3%D9%81%D9%86%D8%AF-1350, look at "۷۵۰۹۱", this means 75091), and the CEO of the Azadi Complex explained it.
Please don't start Edit-Wars.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.117.78.45 (talk) 09:42, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capacity
Talk:Clinical Document Architecture

message: Menglongwang 06:02, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Giorgio Cavaglieri

message: Thanks to Jokestress for creating the article. Capitalistroadster 05:44, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Marc Nelson (singer)

message: I added two links that were interviews featuring Marc Nelson in 2007 seven days ago and they were removed. I recommend that they be added because Marc Nelson gives a excellent and informative interview about himself and being a songwriter that can truly change millions of peoples lives. He rarely gives interviews or speaks of his departures to both Az Yet and Boyz II Men which is something many of his fans have wondered what his point of view of both situations stems from. There is only one other interview of him that has recently been done in March 2011 but the sound quality is poor and you cannot understand it clearly. But the interviews I added were clear,concise and inspiring. I didn't put them on there for Google ranking or even to get more hits I added it simply because there are millions of fans who look up this his page wanting more information about him and to be able to hear his voice and his point of view on his life, songwriting and future projects would surely be a blessing to them all.
I ask that you reconsider adding those links because he gave great information and there are so many people hungry for good information and advice in the music industry!
Elise Nashanti 18:52, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Category talk:BitTorrent websites

message: TorrentReactor.net is pretty big, perhaps it should be labeled as a prominent site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.237.217.119 (talk • contribs) 05:47, 19 May 2007
and what about oink the pink palace?
minamato 17:25, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can anybody update the list to add AniRena to this ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Power2All (talk • contribs) 16:53, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More sites

message: Some of these websites simply list .torrent files; others have actual trackers. Maybe a subcategory could be created for tracker/search engine websites. CALMsavior 04:34, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subcategories
Talk:List of turnpikes in Massachusetts

message: Among other things, the wiki-links need cleanup.  There are a ton of wiki-linked articles that don't exist.  Unless someone is planning on creating them sometime soon, I'd probably clean them up.  Also, there are many other wiki-links that lead to redirects.  Jauerback 19:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not a problem; see Wikipedia:Red link and Wikipedia:Redirect. --NE2 20:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: I've found a copy of the page which was highlighted by the dead link template → http://web.archive.org/web/20030730184029/web.bryant.edu/~history/h364proj/fall_01/tiner/ .  Unfortunately, this relates to Rhode Island turnpikes and not those in Massachusetts. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:47, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing 'list of turnpikes' reference link
Talk:Saud bin Abdul Mohsin

message: #REDIRECT Talk:Saud bin Abdul Muhsin Al Saud
Talk:Saud bin Abdul Mohsin
Saud Bin Abdul Mohsin was not the Acting Governor from 1992-1999. The Governor was still in control. He was Majid bin Abdul Aziz, may he rest in peace. Prince MAjid was active throughout his reign. According to the Saudi Embassy Dated:04/05/1999. King Abdullah of Jordan (attempting to mend important issues) on state visit to Saudi Arabia was welcomed and entertained by the Governor of Makkah Province Prince Majed bin Abdul Aziz. 
--Mccawii 05:54, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Adonizedek

message: While doing research on the character of Melchizedek, I found an unusual interpretation which asserts that Melchizedek and Jesus are the same person. Now, since Melchizedek is often believed to have fought at the Vale of Siddim, this view would practically lead us to think that Jesus himself fought in that battle. ADM (talk) 15:32, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Jesus and the Battle of Siddim
Talk:Pat Abbruzzi

message: I tried to clean this article up the best I could, but it REALLY needs some references and basics (like birth dates, places, etc.) Sundevilesq 06:04, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It really needs a POV scrub for inappropriate tone, and reliable sources are required. I've tagged the article so these maintenance issues can be addressed. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 20:39, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hope you enjoy this trip down memory lane! Six years ago, you tagged this article, but it was never improved. I got my hands on a book with info on Abbruzzi and I've added some sourcing to the article (including correcting many factual errors). I'm not going to dig into the statistics posted in the article, though. If you care to bring this to a better quality, I'm happy to provide a copy of the relevant page in my source. Up to you! ~ RobTalk 02:12, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  References (and more) needed 
Talk:Drive-by download

message: See http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2007/10/how_dumb_is_too.html?cid=nl_IWK_daily (though the URL indicates 'blog' this is a legitimate news item. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 10:30, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article mentioned in the Press 

message: Is this worthy of a mention? Esn (talk) 00:17, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prank

message: Element three on the list is a subset of two. Three defines a drive-by download as, "[a] Download of spyware, a computer virus or any kind of malware that happens without a person's knowledge", but two covers any download made in ignorance. As such, I am merging the two. 143.92.1.33 (talk) 02:22, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundance

message: Drive-by downloads may happen when visiting a website, viewing an e-mail message or by clicking on a deceptive pop-up window:[2] by clicking on the window in the mistaken belief that, for instance, an error report from the computer' operating system itself is being acknowledged, or that an innocuous advertisement pop-up is being dismissed.
The phrase is clumsy and grammatically incorrect, and does not make sense. Please rewrite. Mirrordor 21:49, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phrasing 

message: :1. Downloads which a person authorized but without understanding the consequences...
This is incorrect. By definition a drive-by downloadoccurs without the user committing to a required action. For example, the act of viewing a malicious or compromised web page is not relevant. What matters is whether or not the user is given an option to download an executable file onto their system; only if a file is automatically downloaded does it qualify as a drive-by download. If a user is tricked into downloading a file by using their browser's default behaviour, then it does not qualify (this would instead fall directly under social engineering). ~ Mere Mortal (talk) 12:16, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explicit User Interaction 

message: There was a large paragraph in the article quite obviously written off the top of the head of the editor who added it. It cited no sources, and its tone resembled more that of a forum post than of an encyclopedia article. While informative, it did not belong in a Wikipedia article as it was, so I have removed it. See WP:NOR and WP:MOS.
Turdas (talk) 01:40, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unencyclopedic original research
Talk:Victoria Road (Dagenham)

message: The article is currently very short because a large amount of material was quite rightly removed  as it had been plagiarised from a single, non-independent source. The article does need to be expanded but in the correct way, i.e. from multiple secondary sources and without violating copyright. --Jameboy (talk) 11:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Article expansion
Talk:Flitwick railway station

message: Does this exist or does the newsagent sell food (which doesn't make it a buffet)?
There have been a snack bar running for about 4 years (since ~2005) on platform 4, but it's only open weekday mornings.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.11.222.199 (talk) 10:48, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: buffet
Talk:Kempston Hardwick railway station

message: I noticed this article references the station as the least used station in Bedfordshire. However looking at the latest set of ORR statistics, this is no longer the case. The least used station in Bedfordshire is now Millbrook.
https://dataportal.orr.gov.uk/statistics/usage/estimates-of-station-usage/
I recognise the pandemic may have influenced this change.
I've made a change to this based on these updated statistics.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulwmk (talk • contribs) 16:13, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate information 
Talk:Lunatone and Solrock

message: Why are the Lunatone and Solrock articles merged into one?  I searched the archives of this, and the old Solrock and Lunatone articles, and nowhere was this move discussed!
:The move is discussed in all of the following places: Wikipedia_talk:Pokémon Collaborative Project/Archive 14#Is there any reason why all Pokemon are necessarily notable?, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pokémon/Archive 15#A combination proposal (note: the previous two are archives; bring any continued discussion to the current page, Talk:List of Pokémon (1-20)#Merged Proposal by Zappernapper, Talk:List of Pokémon (1-20)#Why are you doing this?, Talk:Pidgey evolutionary line, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon/Layout. As you can see, this merge has large consensus, and any arguments against it are either WP:ILIKEIT and WP:USEFUL. Not to mention that 493 articles are hell to maintain, and it will be significantly easier to notice vandalism when that number is cut in less-than-half. You Can't See Me! 17:09, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the hell?! 

message: Okay, it's obvious that these two are counterparts, but what source is there saying this? We can't just assume that they somehow "go together" because they are a sun and moon, and because a pair of Gym leaders use them. With no sources, I could just group random Pokémon like Delibird and Dunsparce together, even though they are unrelated. Tamajared 17:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The fact that they're together
Talk:Pats Peak

message: It appears that the vertical drop given on the Pats Peak website (here) is incorrect. If you look at the USGS Henniker quadrangle (Acme Mapper is good because you can toggle back and forth between the topo map and the air photo), you will see that the base elevation is 590 feet (not 690), and the summit elevation is 1290 feet (not 1460), for a vertical drop of 700 feet (not 770). I used the locations of the lowest and highest chairlift stations to get the revised elevations. It is true that the actual summit of Craney Hill is over 1420 feet above sea level, but this is half a mile south of the top chairlift and appears to not be part of the ski area. Does anyone know if the land above the chairlift on Craney Hill is considered part of the skiable terrain? --Ken Gallager (talk) 18:19, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vertical drop 

message: I want to make an edit to this article but wanted confirmation with multiple sources that my edit is correct. This source (NewEnglandSkiHistory) is quite accurate in their logs. I want to make an edit to the manufacturer of the Cascade Basin Triple because the installation was under the company name "VonRoll" at the time instead of "Hall". See this article on Hall Lift. Hall was purchased by VonRoll much before this installation happened. In fact, if you go there often, (this is my own observations so we would probably need more sources to validate this) you can see that "VNRL" is printed onto the base of the chair clamps.  HallCTEC (talk) 03:32, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cascade Basin Triple
Talk:Datchet railway station

message: What zone is Datchet in?  Is it in Zone 6?  If I have a travelcard for zones 1 to 6, can I use it to get to Datchet?  Thanks in advance.  Also, please add to article which zone Datchet is in.  Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.13.86.80 (talk) 11:49, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What zone is Datchet in?
Talk:Newbury railway station

message: I have given this article a large expansion and re-write. I have tried to follow a format similar to that for reading railway station. I have also introduced the adelante service to the service table and edited the articles for the other stations on the line to include this and ensure consistency.
Although I have been making edits of varying size on wiki for some time now, this is by far the largest that I have done in one go. Obviously any comment/criticism is welcomed.
I have tried to include as many references as possible but it would be fair to say that some of the edits come from my own knowledge and could be removed (esp those regarding the use of the sidings/loop). Does anyone know how to reference a timetable? It doesn't have an author or publisher.Grizzlyqi 19:40, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: First of all great job mate. The old saying is be bold! and i can't fault you on that. From a brief overview (and not knowing anything about this part of the world) i think you've done a good job. As for citing a timetable, if you look at the various option offered by the "cite" template, you can actually cite organisations that don't have a specific author (publisher would be National Rail - ie ATOC i think). Keep up the good work, and don't hesitate to ask questions! Pickle 22:45, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for info. Found that the timetable is available in .pdf online so referenced that. Will of course need updating when a new timetable is produced. Would perhaps be better if the National Rail timetable was cited but I don't own a copy of that. Maybe when I find the time I'll edit the article for Newbury Racecourse. It is only a very minor station but it has 3 through platforms and used to have 4. Might be some interesting history in connection with the race course.Grizzlyqi 08:24, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Expansion and re-write
Talk:Bromley Mountain

message: The tone of this article was tagged, so I rewrote it using the existing details.  I would suggest finding a reference for the Ski Magazine piece. Jrclark (talk) 00:58, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work. Badagnani (talk) 01:08, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 
Talk:Yellow-crowned amazon

message: The article says the three-way split "has not so far been supported by research".  Has the lump been supported, or are both views equally unsupported?
I see Amazon parrot lists Yellow-headed as a separate species and Yellow-naped equivocally. —JerryFriedman 16:54, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomic headache 

message: Considering that there are wikipedia articles for all three, I have modified the text rather heavily to match Yellow-crowned sensu stricto. Much of the info I have removed or changed (e.g. under habitat and description) related to the taxa which are treated in the Yellow-headed and Yellow-naped Amazon articles rather than the "true" Yellow-crowned. Furthermore, there were a few issues with concervation status, among other it appears there was some confusion over what taxa are included in the various IUCN and CITES treatments (i.e. as both these authorities follow the split, their status for the Yellow-crowned Parrot relates strictly to the nominate group). Should anyone feel that my edit was too heavy handed, feel free to re-modify it and/or change sections back, but if adding information relating to the Yellow-headed and Yellow-naped (but not the Yellow-crowned), please make sure that you indicate it relates specifically to these. It could be argued that the articles for the Yellow-crowned, -headed and -naped should be merged, but considering that several authorities still consider them separate species, I won't suggest that at this point (though others should of course feel entirely free to do so if they think it would be a good idea). Rabo3 (talk) 01:12, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Yellow-crowned, -headed and -naped

message: there is a (little) stable population in Stuttgart/Germany.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.216.88.244 (talk) 12:23, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  a stable population in Europe 
Talk:Enteric fermentation

message: The article says Australia has a voluntary immunisation program for cattle. 
There was a scheme to enrol cattle in 2001 to help in the development of such a vaccine. But as far
as I can ascertain the project has stopped. There are a few other projects underway to 
reduce methane, but none has got to the field trial stage.
::I deleted it - feel free to edit the article yourself whoever you are Chidgk1 (talk) 19:27, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled