Template talk:WWIIGermanAFVs/Foreign vehicle debate

message: Almost every AFV produced by other nations has a German name and probably some mild instances of use after being captured.  Only those vehicles which were used extensively should be listed here. Oberiko 14:29, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Foriegn vehicles (debate in 2/05)

message: This poll was created by Starfury, and consists of the issue which he considered the debate to be about
This vote is on if to include non-German produced foreign tanks that had relatively high use in a Foreign Vehicles section, including some of the most used captured types, including the Pz 35/38(t) and the Pz 34(r). 
For:
*Starfury 14:00, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, mine is not "all" foreign AFVs. It is to include a small number of the most used Foreign tanks in a seperate Foreign tank section, such as the Pz 38(t).  
* I do not consider the Panzer 35/38(t) to be non-German produced.  I only vote to get rid of the captured examples. Oberiko 16:02, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Does that include French types produced in occupied France then? Also, note that the Pz 34(r) were also ordered from factories, which were re-eqipped hulls with German eqipment.  Starfury 16:31, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you provide me with numbers/sources for vehicles produced in France?  I personally have yet to see any. Oberiko 16:53, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That what I asked him, you might try looking at these , from the site you mentioned earlier.  Starfury 17:03, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There are no numbers for production there.  Simply some conversions and which ones were captured. Any other sources? Oberiko 20:12, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Poll 2

message: * This is pretty bizarre as no one wants to get rid of the Panzer 35/38(t).  As far as I knew the only issue we had was on including the T-34 and S-35. Oberiko 16:00, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not just over if they are there, but where they are and the Foreign Tank section. Regardless, I suspect the 34, and the forein tank section will be rejected, but at least it will be done properly rather then via your shenanigans with changing polls around, and abusing you admin powers. Its likely you would have come back in two months anyway and just reverted as you already tried to do. Finally, note that we still have a disagreement about the format in regards to the line groupings.  16:41, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's something seperate.  I changed the page when I made my last comment, I didn't expect you to change it back without additional support which is why I wasn't around for awhile (being that there are other things I do).  And I've agreed to abide by whatever the outcome of mediation / comment is.  Protecting a page from constant versions is hardly abuse Starfury.  Same goes for getting a third opinion and mediation Oberiko 16:57, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No I dont think so, because you never replied on the talk page then. As for the other matter,  you locked this talk page to stop me from reverting changes you were making to a poll I had made. Im not overly optimistic about your promise, given your past history either.  Starfury 17:25, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't think I'd have to.  I told you I was against the change and expected you to respect that and not change it until you had a greater consensous.  I was surprised to come here and find you had altered it based on the same arguements I did not accept. Oberiko 20:22, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Oberiko check your talk page. Starfury 21:37, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Dual poll comments

message: That stupid "twoversions" tag is making a few dozen German tank articles look like they're heavily disputed.  Could someone remove it? --Carnildo 18:52, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I would like to, but this template is currently under dispute.  It might be best if the template was removed from the pages where it is currently displayed. Oberiko 20:08, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Could someone remove the bloody tag?

message: I believe Starfury and I have come to a consensous.  I will be removing the protection from this page now.  Oberiko 00:00, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Dispute resolved