Talk:RSM-56 Bulava

message: what's the difference from bulava to sineva and R-29RMU2 Layner ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.247.184.173 (talk) 03:19, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: same missile?

message: Just a note for when this article is cleaned up and expanded:
"The first in-flight test launch was conducted September 27, 2005 from the Dmitry Donskoi, a Typhoon class ballistic missile submarine."
From RIA Novosti at 
Hope it's useful somehow. Oceanhahn 01:28, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added it in. Rmhermen 15:52, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Because it failed, that's why. Actually, several officers were fired or reprimanded for leaking this fact to the media. I also heard that Summer 2007 test was also less than fully successful: while missile didn't break up on lauch, as is all three 2006 tests, and flew all the distance, RVs didn't hit the target. Buth then it might be the airframe test, to check whether the errors were indeed corrected, and not the complete run. --Khathi 16:39, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: Do not post unconfirmed reports as factual.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.109.115.2 (talk) 20:21, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dec 9th 2009 UNCONFIRMED 

message: The section should be either removed or clarified. What kind of nuclear blast ? Nuclear bombs explosion energy can vary from 1kt of TNT to 50MT and above, i.e. 50.000 times! Also in what environment? Effects of blast would be very different on the surface, under water, in the atmosphere or in the space. In it's current form the statement about Bulavas ability to withstand nuclear blast at distance 500 meters is rather dubious.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.130.6.175 (talk) 06:13, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capability to withstand nuclear blast 

message: The 2009 Norwegian spiral anomaly article has been proposed to merge into this article. No rationale for said merger has been given.
*Oppose - Article has received significant international coverage and has sufficient notability to remain separate. Mjroots (talk) 19:38, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The merge should happen because the "2009 Norwegian spiral anomaly" (ugh, what a horrible wikineologism) was a launch of this missile, and it is simply a flash-in-the-pan news event best dealt with as part of the larger subject of the (failed) tests of this missile. Fences&Windows 02:59, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 2009 Norwegian spiral anomaly merger

message: Nice work on the new Flight test section. However I did get a little worried after almost three years of collecting news for this section. It seems well written so I wont protest.Walle83 (talk) 12:32, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the appreciation. I believe most of the material I removed was either redundant or obsolete. I think the following structure would be the best: the "development history" mentions those tests which were especially important for the program. The timetable lists all tests. Perhaps in the future I will (re)add some information further information about the tests either to the table or the history section. But right now it seems fine. Offliner (talk) 12:50, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flight test section 

message: There is speculation, that a Bulava missile was test fired from a submarine in the Mediterranean on June 7, 2012.
* 
* 7 June 2012: Russia displays intercontinental nuclear ballistic superiority
-- Petri Krohn (talk) 09:16, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  June 7, 2012 missile test? 

message: some says SS-NX-32 some SS-NX-30 and SS-N-30A not 27 3M14 klub wtafh?! idk .
--Zafer14ur8 (talk) 08:37, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  confused infos about code designation