Talk:Madlax

message: While updating the infobox, I noticed that there are six genres: Action, Heroic bloodshed, Mystery, Psychological thriller, War, and Drama. This should be reduced to the three most relevant genres in accordance with WP:MOS-AM. --Farix (Talk) 00:32, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Heroic bloodshed" should be the first to go. 1) It's not really a genre; 2) it is commonly associated with Hong Kong action films, specifically those directed by John Woo; and 3) beyond the gun-play, Madlax has nothing in common with the heroic bloodshed films. Those films are basically wuxia films set in modern times, with guns in place of swords.--Nohansen (talk) 01:03, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

text: In that case, I'd suggest leaving action, mystery, and war drama (it's supposed to be one genre, hence no comma, but there is not such entry on the Pedia...). --Koveras ☭ 05:46, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genres 

message: Well, I've rewritten the story section and captions for the two screenshots, so the warning box can be removed now... right? --Koveras ☭ 10:33, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. :) -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 13:53, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Third stage

message: The correct way of dealing with information on Wikipedia you perceive as erroneous is to find a source that claims the opposite and add it to the article with a write-up along the lines of "However, other critics have found the shoujo-ai content of the series weak to non-existent, compared to other Bee Train series such as Noir and El Cazador." Removing paragraphs, images, and screwing up refs just counts as vandalism. --Koveras ☭ 12:28, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yuri content 

message: Madlax Complete Collection (2009 Edition) --KrebMarkt (talk) 17:57, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s) 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Madlax. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6EFK0Rjut?url=http://www.jvcmusic.co.jp/-/Discography/A018153/VICL-35646.html to http://www.jvcmusic.co.jp/-/Discography/A018153/VICL-35646.html
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5w4ALtY4Z?url=http://www.hobbyjapan.co.jp/madlax/ to http://www.hobbyjapan.co.jp/madlax/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:47, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Reading through this article has me thinking that this does not meet FA standards. Just skimming through it comes off as it being bare and not well-researched on the anime. Just thinking this needs a complete overhaul. GamerPro64 02:43, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It was reviewed for FA back in 2007, and the FA requirements have risen a lot since then. If you want to nominate it for for a new review, now is as good a time as any... --Koveras (talk) 11:15, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Part of FAR rules is that you have to raise concerns about it before nominating it for review. GamerPro64 18:23, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raising concerns