lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Home Nations Football Championship

message: Began this page as a stub template. Filled out the infomation I have at present (subject to further research) and laid out paragraphs in a style with ???? in place of figures I did not know at the time of writing. Will gradually replace these, and expand the article, but if anyone has any particular knowledge feel free to help out. Grunners 09:46, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: There is already a page on this! It's at British Home Championship (the official name for the tournament - I have never ever heard it called the 'Home Home Nations Football Championship'), which contains far more information than this page. I guess no one thought to search for it.
Anyway, I'll merge the pages. As far as I can tell the only information on this page that is not already on the British Home Championship page is the total winners list. 81.174.247.96 14:43, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I've done that. I've got to say that I think it's funny that someone suggested gathering information from the Free Dictionary Encyclopedia - that's based on Wikipedia! And still no-one realised there was an article about it! 81.174.247.96 14:53, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  There's already a page on this! 

message: ...a lot of people have forgotten what it was called.
I propose a redirect from Home Internationals (soccer) which I recall it being most commonly refered to and deleting this page which I have also never heard it called
:Well, at present there's redirects at 'Home International Championship' and, of course, this page. That may well be sufficent because any search should pick up these pages (but of course sometimes people don't think to search (like in this case)). Maybe just set up redirects as necessary. I don't think one at 'Home Internationals (Soccer)' would be very useful, though, because the chance of someone typing in that exact phrase is remote. Whatever happens, the entry should always remain at British Home Championship, as that's the official title. 81.174.247.96 17:55, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: There appears to be a redirect at 'British Championship' too. 81.174.247.96 18:02, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  The problem is
Talk:Terminal Island

message: added the following to the Terminal Island article:
Demographics:
The population of Terminal Island (as of 2006)was 1,500 people. The racial background of Terminal Island is 32.01% White, 23.92% Black, 1.39% American Indian & Alaska Native alone, 2.79% Asian, 0.84% Native Hawaiin & other Pacific Islander, 21.06% some other race alone, 4.11% two or more races, and 37.94% Hispanic or Latino.
Since I could find no demographics info from the US Census factfinder website, and since 1,500 people seems highly unlikely for an industrial area, I've deleted the demographics section from the article. Besides, the number don't add up. BlankVerse 14:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I forgot about Federal Correctional Institution, Terminal Island, but that articles says that there are less than 1,200 inmates. BlankVerse 11:37, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics 

message: Question: Which bridge is the site of the finale of the 1986 movie "52 Pickup"?Maccb (talk) 03:31, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question: 

message: I replaced the word "monstrous" because the plane was really, really big.  From the OED:  5a. Of unnaturally or extraordinarily large dimensions; gigantic, immense, enormous.  The extraordinary bigness of the airplane is attested to in the source that the sentence is cited to.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 03:32, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  monstrous spruce goose 

message: Hello, my name is Danny Fujikawa, grandson of Dr. Yoshihiko Fred Fujikawa and Alice May Fujikawa, nee Aoki, who were nisei living on terminal island when world war II went down.  I find it important to correct and i hope the editors are able to do so, the fact that they were ordered to evacuate 48 hrs directly after the so-called "battle of los angeles" of feb 25th, 1942; the most notorious/mysterious UFO case in los angeles' history.  it's def an interesting as well as important fact that should be addressed/fixed in this matter.  My grandparents heard the ruckus in the wee hours of the 25th, went outside and witnessed this ghastly ordeal!  this statement is incorrect:  "Immediately after the signing of Executive Order 9066 on February 19, 1942, the rest of the inhabitants were given 48 hours to evacuate their homes."
 
1. interview with Dr. Y. Fred Fujikawa:   http://articles.latimes.com/1992-05-20/local/me-208_1_fujikawa
2. http://encyclopedia.densho.org/Terminal_Island,_California/
3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Los_Angeles
Peace 
Danny  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.13.227.53 (talk) 07:55, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Los Angeles 

message: Terminal Island is located in Council District 15 of the City of Los Angeles.
Terminal Island is located within the boundaries of the Wilmington Neighborhood Council
Federal Correction Institute (FCI)Federal Correction Instituteis located on Terminal Island  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harbortown90744 (talk • contribs) 03:15, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Government
Talk:Akutagawa Prize

message: "139 2008E Yuki Kurumi for A Summer in a City(り日乳と)" - The Japanese for this entry looks rather strange (to put it lightly), and Googling brings up nothing. I think there's been a mistake.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.197.41 (talk) 04:13, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Summer in a City 

message: It would perhaps be helpful to understand how the numbering works. For example, on https://www.bunshun.co.jp/shinkoukai/award/akutagawa/list.html it says prizes 161 and 162 were awarded in 2019 but the following year, in 2020, there are two prizes with the number 163. What would be the reason for this? - Simeon (talk) 11:59, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The "year" heading is not indicating the year in which the Prize is announced/awarded in. The Akutagawa Prize is awarded every July for novels published in the first half (上) of the year. It is then awarded every January of the following year for novels published in the second half (下) of that previous year. However, there are often two winners for the same half of the year. That is why you frequently see a repeat in the Prize # and Year columns. For example, there are two winners for the 163rd Akutagawa Prize, which was announced in July 2020 for novels from the first half of 2020 (2020上). The 164th Akutagawa Prize was then awarded in January 2021 for novels from the second half of 2020, but this time it was awarded to only one novel. Sorry if it is confusing. That is my understanding of the Prize after researching it extensively. Οἶδα (talk) 17:27, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ahh, thanks for clarifying. I had understood there to be one prize per each half of the year but if there can be more than one then it makes sense for numbers to be repeated. Thanks again for responding and clarifying :) - Simeon (talk) 17:33, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries. Glad to help! Οἶδα (talk) 17:38, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

text: Done! Οἶδα (talk) 07:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  How are the prizes numbered?
Talk:BoF

message: Although it's pretty funny, the original entry
:a term used to describe persons having common characteristics or related interests. 
wasn't very encyclopedic so I took the liberty of changing it.
Uranographer 11:33, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: This page is really just a padded disambiguation page, which is the spirit in which I've added some more BOFs to it today. Content could be translocated to appropriate wikilinked articles. If I get time, I'll have a go (unless someone disagrees here, that is). Hebrides 15:01, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just done it. With the transfert of Birds of a feather, I think it's good now Comte0 12:04, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Really a disambiguation page

message: I'm quite sure I've heard people use this acronym for Buffer overflow attacks, BoF. Am I right? If I am, add it to the list. Neoecs 04:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Buffer Overflow?

message: Please stop adding this entry - there is no article (as of today), so no entry here is required. Widefox (talk) 13:15, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There is now. Please see WP:IDONTKNOWIT for further info. Comte0 (talk) 07:56, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bits of Freedom
Talk:Parliamentary system

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Parliamentary and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at  until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs)  23:48, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Parliamentary" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Here look this trash edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1182276512&oldid=1181816650&title=Parliamentary_system 
The problem: I would simply revert, but some good people like @Mr Serjeant Buzfuz edited out a little but not most of that trash, instead of me reverting the latest edits of the good guys, I'll leave this warning to get them to do it. If not, I'm a noob, so the simplest path is for me to revert until to before the vandalism, but I wait until you decide the best path. Santropedro (talk) 23:45, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Santropedro, I was editing on my phone when I did that partial revert, and obviously didn't notice how many irrelevant wikilinks had been inserted.  Thanks for drawing it to my attention.  I think I've cleaned them all up.  Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 02:05, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for doing that job! I came back after remembering this situation. I sent you a thank you notification for your edit. See you. Santropedro (talk) 20:38, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help me to revert this latest "vandalism" 

message: What is reproduction 2409:408A:2E8D:7C96:0:0:6CB:1406 (talk) 00:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biology
Talk:Electroencephalogram

message: After an anonymous edit to this article I wanted to check the true year of the discovery of the EEG. A Google search is inconclusive. It seems to favour 1875, but there are some seemingly authoritative claims of 1885 and 1887. Which is it? Can anyone offer a decent reference for a particular year (preferably the original paper)? —Rory ☺ 12:14, Sep 10, 2004 (UTC)
The history of EEG begins in 1875 when Richard Caton in Liverpool discovered the existence of electrical signals from the exposed brain of rabbits and monkeys. This discovery was done by employing the galvanometer invented
seventeen years earlier by Lord Kelvin.
REFERENCE: "Niederhauser’s Model for Epilepsy and Wavelet Methods, Page 2, section 2.1"
130.179.229.231 19:04, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discovery 

message: should this be merged with electroencephalography? - Omegatron 13:30, Sep 15, 2004 (UTC)
:Yes, absolutely. The correct article title is indeed electroencephalography, and this article (electroencephalogram) should redirect. —Rory ☺ 13:41, Sep 15, 2004 (UTC)
Absolutely not! Even though P300 could be detected using electroencephalography signal but as a matter of the fact it's an Event-related potential response, therefore it would be better to be merged with Event-related potential than anything else.
--130.179.229.231 18:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge?
Talk:Genevieve

message: Argh! The page is half about St. Genevieve the person and half about the abbey consecrated to her. The section "Canons of St. Genevieve" for example definitely belongs to a page about a church or an abbey, not about the saint. (Possibly the page "Pantheon", since the French Pantheon occupies what used to be the Church of St. Genevieve -- I'm not entirely sure if that would be the same church that the "canons of St. G." would have been attached to.) Wegesrand (talk) 14:15, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The canons were attached to the monastery at the abbey, the medieval church.--Parkwells (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation needed!

message: Should "Genevieve" be used or "Geneviève"? Both are right now used... Lapaz 18:07, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unification of typography 

message: Just throwing this out there if anyone should add Saint Genevieve influences or something... but there is a Ste. Genevieve county and Ste. Genevieve city in Missouri.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.220.221.146 (talk) 09:35, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tidbits 

message: I don't see any of her miracles here, like ship levitation, trees joining in a battle, or people that were able to levitate/fly. These should be included to show the glory of god.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.183.16.227 (talk) 02:11, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miracles 

message: It seems anachronistic that France is listed in the infobox for her birth and death, when this is contradicted by the usual practice for other biographical articles which typically list the specific polity that was contemporaneous with the person's birth/death, not one that existed later. Two examples are the bishops mentioned in this very article, namely Germanus of Auxerre and Lupus of Troyes. Both show the Western Roman Empire (though modern city names are given). I'm going to change this in the infobox. Open to dissenting opinions. Global Cerebral Ischemia (talk) 02:14, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  infobox, locations of her birth and death 

message: As I'm researching this bio, I found some interesting information about this lay confraternity, in Patroness of Paris, by Moshe Sluhovsky (pp. 165ff). There's a great deal of details that I don't think belongs here in St. Genevieve's bio. It might be better to create a new article about the Company, although you'd have to supplement it with additional sources. Just a thought, something I might take on myself someday.  Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 18:46, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company of the Bearers of Reliquary of Sainte Geneviève
Talk:Neva

message: I've added a map of the Neva.Jauntymcd 18:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map added in Geography section 

message: In Finnish neva is one sort of swamp and the area was formerly inhabited by Finns as well as other Finnic peoples, so the name 'Neva' probably comes from it. From Finnish Wikipedia --Jaakko Sivonen 02:30, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Finnish origin of the name 'Neva' 

message: Article states, that Neva is the fourth largest river of Europe by discharge. Another Wikipedia article states the Neva is sixth largest river. Perhaps this issue should be clarified.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rivers_of_Europe 2600:1010:BF08:17B4:4B71:80FB:101:62 (talk) 04:16, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rank of this river
Talk:James Stephens (author)

message: *This article is part of WikiProject Irish literature. See that page for further information. 
Moved from article
What I heard is that James Joyce once called James Stephens the true living master of the English language and he named Stephens to complete his unfinished works when he died.  It's hard to imagine that this is true, though James Stephens is a wonderful writer--but so sentimental and sugary that one wouldn't think James Joyce would much care for him.
:The claims that Joyce described Stephens to Stanislaus Joyce as "my rival, the latest Irish genius", and that for two years they discussed plans for Stephens to finish Finnegan's Wake if Joyce was unable to, is made in the introduction (pp7–8) of the Arcturus Publishing 2020 Pbk Edition of Irish Fairy and Folk Tales ISBN 978-1-83857-539-7 (originally Irish Fairy Tales, Macmillan 1920). {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 90.199.215.44 (talk) 18:41, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I personally think that the timeline should be removed.
he was  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.157.69.112 (talk) 17:25, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Timeline
Talk:Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003

message: Right?  "This act is set to expire in 2010" -- well it did expire and was renewed and will expire in 2012 now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.239.79.82 (talk) 22:51, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: First sentence needs to be updated

message: Do JGTRRA's terms change in 2011? I don't know if it's due to sunsetting or to new terms in the act, but, Fidelity's website shows changes to income tax rates in 2011. It's on a secured page so I can't link to it but I'll paste what it says:
:::What are the current federal income tax rates?
:::The Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 (JAGTRRA) accelerated the tax reductions made by the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) by further reducing the individual tax rates.
:::Marginal tax rates
:::2003-2010 10% 15% 25% 28% 33% 35%
:::: 2011 +   N/A 15% 26% 31% 36% 39.6%
Can anyone say what's going on here? Thanks 68.123.47.165 18:37, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Don't more changes kick in in 2011?

message: The federal deficit dropped from $413 billion in 2004 to $161 billion in 2007. (http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/downchart_gs.php?year=2000_2009&view=1&expand=&units=b&fy=fy10&chart=G0-fed&bar=1&stack=1&size=m&title=US) 
The unemployment rate was 6% in 2003 and dropped to 4.6% in 2007. (http://www.bls.gov/cps/prev_yrs.htm)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.126.219.143 (talk) 21:37, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Effects of tax cut?

message: This bill passed the Senate by a smaller majority than is generally required to pass legislation.  At least 60 votes are needed for cloture.  How did this bill pass with only a 51-49 majority?  Shouldn't there be some mention of this aspect in the article?  Thanks.  --Art Smart Chart/Heart 21:16, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passed Senate 51-49.  How so? 
Talk:Renegade

message: It's just a plural so why not? 86.148.169.80 (talk) 11:24, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible merge with Renegades (disambiguation)

message: Your music is great. I also like to create this sort of music on my computer. I use a program created by Arturia. The program is Storm 3.0.
Could you please tell me where you got yourdrum & bass samples from. I wiould like to use them with all different sorts of instruments and synthesizers. If you are able to send these samples, please send them to ken-suem@gonuts4free.es that´s only if you can. Thanks alot dude.
James Ryan Martin  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.151.197.233 (talk) 10:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great music.
Talk:Yellow

message: These pages should be protected because of consistency with other color pages. Blockman9000 (talk) 13:26, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be preferable, but pages are not pre-emptively protected unless actual vandalism occurs on this article or the other articles you have listed. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 05:04, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yellow, Orange and Violet colors must be protected pages 

message: Please correct: L*=97.1; C*=96.9; hab= 102.8° ZJ (talk) 14:46, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  CIELAB 

message: There's a source listed but it seems fairly dubious that yellowing leaves is considered a 5th season. Our article on seasons and general present-day Mandarin only list 4 seasons. Our other treatment of traditional 5 element seasonal mappings puts the "5th season" as the idea of the seasons changing every 3rd month, not an actual 5th season slotted in as late summer. — LlywelynII 17:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese seasons
Talk:Gömör County

message: Are you sure the position of Malohont between Tekov and Rimavska Sobota is correct? I think Tekov is pretty far from Rimavska Sobota. Is Malohont the western part of Gemer-Malohont? Markussep 14:55, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Malohont

message: I think, we need to split this article. 1, a separate article on the former administrative unit under the title Gömör County and 2, the current informal traditional region under the title Gemer. --Norden1990 (talk) 20:19, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Support, the same way as Liptó County and Liptov.(KIENGIR (talk) 09:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. There is already an article about former county. This one was before article about region as such, before they edited it, so now there are two articles about former county, although this was written as an article about geographical region. Lukáč Peter (talk) 10:51, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: As outlined above, we don't have two articles about the former county, since the other one is from only 1802, which is not identical but a successor-merger country.(KIENGIR (talk) 19:33, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Split
Talk:Carole Lombard

message: On August 18th, 2023,TCM aired To Be or Not To Be, with the following lines spoken by Lombard's character: "..he's going to take me up 10,000 feet in the air; I don't think there's anything wrong with that do you, Anna?" This could be the dialog that may have been deleted from early showings of the film. TCM'S recent airing now includes her lines about flying. StinkyLinda (talk) 19:36, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  To be or not to be..reference to flying 

message: We can include the whole short now that it is public domain. It is uploaded in two parts to YouTube. Someone would just need to stitch the two parts together and remove the audio. SDudley (talk) 14:09, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  1928's run, girl, run