Talk:Terminal Link

message: "A cable-driven APM is the most environmentally responsible solution for transportation in high density applications."
It is certainly an opinion. Not sure that it's a "Fact".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.200.4.237 (talk) 16:12, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  The reference following that was to the manufacturer.  I attributed that to the manufacturer.  This sentence should probably be removed all together, if a third party isn't referenced.  Geo Swan (talk) 04:49, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising much? 

message: Several URLs bare urls.  Please people, never use bare urls.  I changed all but one of these to populated  templates.  The one I didn't change didn't support the paragraph where it was cited.
I found many of the references didn't support the sentences or paragraphs where they were placed, so I added some .
A new reference I found said that the rolling stock cost $56,000,000 and the tracks and stations cost $150,000,000.  The article currently says the whole system cost $56,000,000.
I suspect that if the Blue 22 system is a success it will overwhelm this system's 2000 pppd capacity.  The goal of the blue 22 system is to get airline passengers from downtown to the airport in 22 minutes.  The people-mover, as currently constructed, could almost double this.  The first time I took it was a Saturday, around noon, and the second car didn't start up until 1pm.  The article says the maximum wait for a train was 8 minutes?  It seemed longer.  I'll bet it will seem incredibly long if you are late boarding your flight.  The train itself seems quite slow.  And then there is the incredibly bad design of placing the stations up a couple of escalators, and a considerable walk for the arrivals and departure lounges.
Even if the cable car technology were replaced by a faster technology I suspect the tight curves would keep the speed down to a crawl.
I plan to keep my eyes peeled for RS that address these issues.  Geo Swan (talk) 05:13, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: References were a mess

message: I am sure the bulleted list is accurate, and made sense to whoever contributed it.  But I find it opaque.  I think it has something to do with the layout of the wheels -- but what?  Geo Swan (talk) 05:23, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opaque bulleted list? 

message: Geo Swan brought up this issue in the section of this talk page titled "References were a mess". Geo Swan provided the following discussion on this issue:
:"A new reference I found said that the rolling stock cost $56,000,000 and the tracks and stations cost $150,000,000.  The article currently says the whole system cost $56,000,000."
I did not see what source had the cost listed as $150,000,000, but if there is a source, then I agree with changing the amount as the $56,000,000 is not sourced. The source provided for the entire table I have not been able to access. 
User226 (talk) 22:37, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Contract Amount

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on LINK Train. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060721211841/http://www.dcc.at/cells/4_1/tdt.html to http://www.dcc.at/cells/4_1/tdt.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050405202545/http://www.dcc.at/main.htm to http://www.dcc.at/main.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:19, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
----
:Link Train →  – "Terminal Link" is the name used by Pearson Airport, and secondary sources like Via Rail and MiWay.  "Link Train" does not appear to be the common name. 162 etc. (talk) 04:42, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that from your links Via calls it "Terminal Link train", MiWay uses "Terminal LINK Train" and "LINK Train" in the same paragraph. UP Express still calls it the "Link Train service" while this Insauga news article from 2021 matches Via and used "Terminal Link train". I agree the service has been rebranded by the airport (per nom), and the change is just slowly being adapted by other agencies. BLAIXX 14:14, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 April 2022