Talk:Edelweiss Lodge and Resort

message: Is this article intended to be free advertising space for this facility?  I ask because it's nowhere near "encyclopedic in nature".  The detailed current eligibility requirements for staying in this facility (which are highly subject to change) have no place here.   Nor does the naming of a particular travel agency currently located in the facility.  There is no mention of the great expense incurred in maintaining this arguably underutilized US DoD leisure facility, estimated to run in the millions of $US each year.  It would seem that the entire article was written by the facility's (or its parent organization's) PR department.  
Just as with the Wikipedia article on United Services Organization, Wikipedia unfortunately allows too much discretion in allowing the entities themselves to toot their own horn (and to remove derogatory, yet truthful information) at will, greatly damaging the reputation of Wikipedia.  
--JJ--   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:6:2347:D433:2CF1:BE2B:54D0:802C (talk) 15:16, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not only does it seem a bit like an advert, some of it seems to be copypasted from what I guess is military boilerplate. oatco (talk) 21:29, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

message: :Image:Logo elr.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:27, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Logo elr.jpg

message: :Image:Logo elr.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:12, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Logo elr.jpg

message: The long list of eligibility requirements in the lead section of this article seem first of all to be pretty irrelevant for a general audience encyclopedia (it could basically be summarized as "active duty US military, their families, and employees of the military") and second of all it seems copypasted. Surely enough, I found that  contains basically the same list, in a page with "© 2020 Army MWR" in the footer, with extra details that were . I'm also inclined to agree with the above that this article in general seems quite like an advertisement, although admittedly not exactly ready to be printed in a brochure. — oatco (talk) 21:50, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: And an archive.org link to the site in question:  — oatco (talk) 21:52, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Probable copypasting