Template talk:LaVeyan Satanism sidebar

message: I hope I did the colors right... I mean, Satanism subject deserves its dark colors but I am not sure how well it goes with the wikipedia color theme =\. Insights will be appreciated.
--Vitalyb 23:06, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've fixed up the template just a little, scaling down the font sizes and adding a picture for the header: :Image:Pentagram with one point down (de Guaita).jpg. I couldn't find a better image though, but I believe this one will do. --...Wikiwøw 15:54, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But for some reason, it has messed up all the articles with the template. For now, I've reverted it, but the template should still be fixed. Not that it matters much, but the template itself is quite ugly and doesn't fit with any proper format. --...Wikiwøw 15:58, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

message: How can you link Objectivism with Satanism? This is absurd!!--Arado 13:13, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Anton LeVey did. And that's reason enough. -- LGagnon 13:24, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not so sure that it is. Just because one branch of Satanism was inspired by one branch of Objectivism? If your goal is to be complete about linking anything remotely related to any branch of Satanism in this template, there are other things to worry about than Objectivism. Christianity has had much more of an influence on Satanism than Objectivism has, I'm sure you would agree. samrolken 04:16, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objectivism 

message: What does the Moral Majority have to do with Satanism? The link is not made clear in the Moral Majority or Satanism articlse. --SigPig\SEND - OVER 04:06, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moral Majority 

message: I've added The Satanic Scriptures into the template, as well as having created an article for the book. I hope this is acceptable. Darkahn 22:42, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Satanic Scriptures 

message: Since I and the Sinagogue of Satan are two different things how is it a personal plug?
The banner is Biased and so was your edit.Rev. Michael S. Margolin 00:59, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It most more then likely removed because it was a personal plug, in the form of you being the founder of this Sinagogue. ≈ The Haunted Angel //The Forest Whispers My Name// 01:01, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree with the second part, but unfortunately most people here would deem what you're doing as advertising - or they would say the Sinagogue isn't notable enough for a place on the template or a major mention. I'm not an expert on your brand admittedly, so I can't say how popular it is (the first I heard of it was by chance clicking on your User Page a while ago). Although it's position on the template is a dubious one, one thing I would be in favour of is an article on the Religion. Unfortunately, the article was deleted and protected to prevent re-creation - which now leaves the problem that the link on the template (or the one that you are proposing be added) is a dead one, leading to an article which no longer exists. Tell me, what were the reasons for the article being deleted in the first place? ≈ The Haunted Angel //The Forest Whispers My Name// 01:14, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Yeah, see WP:3RR. Anyway, if you believe the article to be biased, go ahead and edit it. However, the Wikipedia community has unfortunately deemed your "Sinagogue" as un-notable, and if it is not really worthy of an article, the unfortunately it cannot be expected to be on this template. ≈ The Haunted Angel //The Forest Whispers My Name// 01:44, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

text: If you wish to change the deleted status of your article, then I would suggest doing it here. ≈ The Haunted Angel //The Forest Whispers My Name// 03:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Sinagogue of Satan 

message: Should the template be revised overall? Link to the different Satanism articles and the articles of organizations that are now covered in Wiki? WerewolfSatanist 20:00, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to keep up with current changes?  

message: I don't know why "Lex Talionis" was taken out. It is very much a related concept. Lex talionis is "the Law of Retaliation" or as LaVey said, "If a man smite you on one cheek, smash him on the other." WerewolfSatanist 03:52, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lex Talionis as an associated concept! 

message: Associated Organizations:
The Church Of Satan
WTF?
The Church Of Satan, founded by Anton Szandor LaVey, has nothing to do with Karla LaVey's ripoff. These two "Churches" are anything but associated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.133.187.187 (talk) 14:36, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Associated Organization?