lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Radjah shelduck

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Tadorna radjah - Centenary Lakes.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 24, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-02-24. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:14, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Tadorna radjah - Centenary Lakes.jpg]] to appear as POTD 

message: :Raja shelduck →  – Far more often referred to by "radjah" than by "raja" (100 vs 17 Google Books results). This name is used in the Handbook of the Birds of the World and by BirdLife International, and is the historic name of the species. While WikiProject Birds uses IOC World Bird List names by default, in this case usage is clear. --Relisted. Dekimasuよ! 03:11, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Amer Sports

message: Change Douglas Gilbert(CFO) to Andrew Page(CFO) and Revenue 2.6 billion euros (2021) to 3.4 billion euros (2023). Oloihminen (talk) 10:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: CFO updated; Revenue was unreferenced.  Spintendo  11:17, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  edit COI
Talk:Underdogs (song)

message: This article is in dire need of attention. It needs: 
*A year of release
*the record label
*critical acclaim
*consideration of whether the song merits an article of its own, rather than forming a section of Send Away the Tigers
*inline citations providing references to respectable sources in order to verify information.
I would be glad to help, as a fan of the band myself and am watching the page so I may make improvements at a later point. HJ Mitchell (talk) 02:30, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagging

message: There is no evidence at all within this article that the song satisfies Notability (music) and is deserving of its own article. Lachlan Foley (talk) 00:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:Kino precision

message: Is the name of this company "Kino" as referred to in the title of the article? In the article the name of the company is referred to twice as "Kiron". Is this a typo? Vaniac 11:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of lens maker

message: The talk page is the place to ask for help or to communicate to other editors, not the article itself. Thanks. Vaniac 12:42, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk pages

message: The result of the AfD as referenced above was to merge this article into Kiron Lenses.  Note that there is no new information from this article to merge so I have merely changed it to a redirect.  It was noted in the AfD that it seemed unusual to merge the company into the brand name but that was the consensus.  Any proposal to merge that info back here and make the redirect point to the company should be discussed on the talk page before proceeding. Arkyan • (talk) 21:57, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to [[Kiron Lenses]]
Talk:Your Love Alone Is Not Enough

message: Doesn't  "I could have seen for miles and miles" verse has something to do with Pete Townsend's song of similar title, huh? 212.76.37.142 20:41, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics 

message: Does anyone have any sources describing this song's video, please? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:32, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video
Template talk:Rugby squad player

message: I came here looking for help on how to use the template.... Murkee 11:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So did I... this is a frequent problem with rugby union templates I'm afraid! Mbwa mwitu (talk) 14:55, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Documentation and instructions have now been posted. --Bob (talk) 00:07, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Talk:DNA Oyj

message: A paid editor made contributions to this article, and has disclosed that fact on this page, therefore the paid contributions template is a matter of fact and does not require discussion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 13:28, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the policy "if you place the Paid tag, you should promptly start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what is non-neutral about the article." As a paid editor I'm not allowed to remove the tag myself, but if any volunteer editor thinks that the neutral point of view of the article is ok, they are free to remove the tag as told in the Template:Paid contributions instructions: "If you do not start this discussion, then any editor is justified in removing the tag without warning."Jjanhone (talk) 16:57, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Paid contributions tag
Talk:Fiskars

message: A paid editor made contributions to this article, and has disclosed that fact on this page, therefore the paid contributions template is a matter of fact and does not require discussion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 13:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the policy "if you place the Paid tag, you should promptly start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what is non-neutral about the article." As a paid editor I'm not allowed to remove the tag myself, but if any volunteer editor thinks that the neutral point of view of the article is ok, they are free to remove the tag as told in the Template:Paid contributions instructions: "If you do not start this discussion, then any editor is justified in removing the tag without warning."Jjanhone (talk) 17:02, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Reviewed the article, did not identify any neutrality problems, removed template per above. --Cornellier (talk) 23:46, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Paid contributions tag
Talk:Nasdaq Helsinki

message: The section "Currently listed stocks (followed by quote symbol)" should be eliminated. and a section of "trading rules" should be added. Jackzhp (talk) 16:10, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and have removed the list. Sargdub (talk) 02:34, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Trading rules
Talk:Huhtamäki

message: Hutamaäki has three production sites in Germany Ronsberg im Ostallgäu , Forchheim  und Alf. The site with 500 workers in Göttingen was closed in 2005. []  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stone (talk • contribs) 20:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Germany
Talk:Iittala

message: I will be updating this page soon with more detailed info's about Iittala's company history, design history, designers and any other relevant information that I find in the books that I am using. Any input into the changes is more than appreciated, thanks.
Stephanag (talk) 07:25, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Tone is wrong and often sounds promotional. Iittala's designs may be stunning, but Wikipedia shouldn't be telling you that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imonomicon (talk • contribs) 14:48, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality disputed. 
Talk:Kemira

message: A paid editor made contributions to this article, and has disclosed that fact on this page, therefore the  is a matter of fact and does not require discussion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:36, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the policy "if you place the Paid tag, you should promptly start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what is non-neutral about the article." As a paid editor I'm not allowed to remove the tag myself, but if any volunteer editor thinks that the neutral point of view of the article is ok, they are free to remove the tag as told in the Template:Paid contributions instructions: "If you do not start this discussion, then any editor is justified in removing the tag without warning."Jjanhone (talk) 17:05, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just reverted a COI tag blanking. This article has significant due weight and tone issues;  is not encyclopaedic language, and neither is we don't care what companies say about themselves in marketing materials, we care about what reliable sources have to say about them. It's also filled with press-releaseish history that strikes me as excessive. Blablubbs|talk 14:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The lines mentioned here have now been removed. Anything else? I read "press-releish" history as poor references. What are those exactly? Jjanhone (talk) 11:05, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

text: Hello Sadads & KarimKoueider! You've edited this article earlier, do you see some problems in its content? Jjanhone (talk) 13:26, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Paid contributions tag
Talk:Outokumpu

message: whoever the unregistered editor was, who deleted this info and termed it irrelevant: women quotas are hardly irrelevant, especially in a company, that so wants to please investors with sustainability here and governance there. my guess is you work for Outokumpu. you could thank me for cleaning up/ updating "your" page. 
check out this article: Germany set to introduce legal quota for women in boardrooms  The Independent Nov 18,2013--Wuerzele (talk) 05:38, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  deleting "all male" from leadership team 

message: and  I assume these are 2 accounts of the same person ? thanks for editing the date of the Thyssen and Outokumpu announcements. I re-inserted the Thyssen side, because it adds a little bit more information and is not the same what you wrote instead.  I realize that this is a site about Outokumu, but on encyclopedias context is always a plus. 
Quick question: Do you work for Outokumpu? --Wuerzele (talk) 08:18, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thyssen Outokumpu story 
Talk:Outotec

message: GSS added the tag that Outotec might not be notable enough for Wikipedia so let's start a discussion about the issue. Talouselämä magazine studies the 500 biggest companies in Finland every year by their revenue and this year Outotec was number 59. The news is behind a pay wall unfortunately but I could take a screenshot to prove this if needed. Is this single fact enough to prove the notability or what kind of evidence should I start digging? Jjanhone (talk) 13:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to start from removing unreliable and self-published sources and put some reliable, secondary sources that establish notability. Most of the sources are not in English so I'm unsure about their reliability and depth. Please see WP:CORPDEPTH for more. Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 14:13, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! I've removed most of the self-published refs, see . Is this enough already? And the Finnish sources I've used here are from the biggest news media in Finland, independent of Outotec.Jjanhone (talk) 19:28, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: How about now, is there still some refs that are seen unreliable? Jjanhone (talk) 10:39, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi all, I am a native Finnish speaker and knowing the media landscape in Finland a little bit, I can state that in my eyes the used Finnish language media sources are from independent and respected publishers.Qtea (talk) 10:54, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks Qtea! Is this enough evidence for you GSS? :) If not how about you Finnusertop&, can you confirm that the refs I've used are ok? I would like to get the warning "Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable." removed now that the notability warning has been removed. And thank you for that GSS&Finnusertop. :) Jjanhone (talk) 13:19, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'd be happy to remove the tag about unreliable sources, unless someone can name sources in the article that are actually unreliable. The bulk of sources used are from reputable Finnish media. A few are by Outotec themselves, which is not ideal and should be replaced where possible (and even then, that would be , not reliability, and isn't a big issue with the present article). – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 14:25, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've removed the tag. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 06:45, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Rautaruukki

message: According to the policy "if you place the Paid tag, you should promptly start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what is non-neutral about the article." As a paid editor I'm not allowed to remove the tag myself, but if any volunteer editor thinks that the neutral point of view of the article is ok, they are free to remove the tag as told in the Template:Paid contributions instructions: "If you do not start this discussion, then any editor is justified in removing the tag without warning."Jjanhone (talk) 16:47, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the paid edits tempalte as there is no paid editing related problems. However the article itself would require updating as the information is rather old. When article is updated it would be benefical to use more references. --Zache (talk) 16:55, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Paid edits template

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:42, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:SSH Communications Security

message: I sincerely question the sense and fairness of the notability template slapped on this article. A quick look shows that it has sister-articles on 3 other Wikipedias. Have they all failed to recognize this article as non-notable? And a company already 20 years on the stock exchange is not an average IT-company. Was the a proper WP:BEFORE before slapping down this template? The Banner talk 05:45, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Sanoma

message: Somewhere in this article a mention should be made of the extreme left wing processes and censorship prevalent on Sanoma media. The Dutch nu.nl news portal (owned by Sanoma) for example censors and bans all comments on news articles as soon as a centre right or far right view is added. Comments are then disabled for everyone. It's noteworthy that so many news articles have 0 comments because commenting any non-left wing views results in comments being banned for everybody.
77.250.197.189 (talk) 17:12, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Extreme left wing views and censorship
Talk:Agrin

message: I dont know who ranked this low... but with all due respect, that is not appropriate.
Agrin is necessary for formation of the neuromuscular junction - making it pretty darn critical in neurobiology.
It's not fo low importance.
Please change that.
Gacggt 22:22, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Takefumi Sakata

message: Akira Kouchiyama
I think that this revision is the translation from the Japanese version. However, this article has no information about the inheritance of the page history from that. Therefore, I strongly suspect that this is a GFDL violation. Moreover the Japanese version hadn't specified any source, and hasn't been a reliable information. Almost all the articles created or added by this user seem to have a same GFDL problem. Regards. --Akira Kouchiyama 18:31, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The two are slightly different but close enough that I added an attribution tag. Wizardman 15:18, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly copyvio
Talk:Stockmann

message: The section "Lindex" contains the sentence: "Lindex operates in 16 countries with 469 stores in 16 countries at the end of 2012." In my opinion this is a little redundant, I think. 81.175.146.238 (talk) 23:23, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Is this really supposed to be in the category :Category:1862 establishments in Germany? The article says that in 1862, Georg Franz Stockmann took control of a store in Helsinki. Although G.F.Stockmann was German, the store was Finnish. This article is about the company, not its founder. JIP | Talk 20:42, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I see this was already handled, thanks! JIP | Talk 21:56, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  1862 establishments in Germany?
Talk:Finland Steamship Company

message: At the moment this article is (obviously) named Effoa, which I originally chose as it's the name I had heard this company most commonly being referred to as in Finland. However, of the 107 years that the company was in existance it was known under the name "Effoa" for only 14 years; during the vast majority of it's existance it was known as Finland Steamship Company (which is actually a slight mistranslation of the original Swedish-language name, but that's besides the point). Finland Steamship Company also seems to be the form commonly used in most English-language material outside Wikipedia. Therefore it is now my belief that the article should be renamed to better reflect common usage. In case someone might oppose the move I thought it better to ask opinions first. — Kjet (talk · contribs) 18:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 
Talk:Battle of Sidi Bou Zid

message: I really want to start working in the article but i need some sort of help with the grammar. In the other hand i have some books and a lot of time, if you want to cooperate with me reply here.
best wishes. Miguel  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.62.146.244 (talk) 16:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need help! 

message: Article used to say that germans shelled The 1st Armored Division with 8.8 cm KwK 43 anti-tank guns, which is obviously wrong as KwK 43 is not an anti-tank gun, but a tank gun, and it was not in use at the time of the battle. The sources state only that 88mm guns were used. I'd say that the guns were FlaKs, but cant find anything to verify this. --UltimateDestroyerOfWorlds (talk) 19:15, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably meant the PaK43 anti-tank version ofthe KwK. 1812ahill (talk) 14:16, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  88mm guns 

message: Did a tidy-up and made start on citations and references.Keith-264 (talk) 07:32, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Recent edits, if anyone wants to discuss the recent edits, remembering WP:civil, please go ahead.Keith-264 (talk) 11:42, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  CE 
Talk:Greg Sarris

message: * A little more on Sarris' biography
* more on his education
* more on his career
* more on his connection to the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria
* photo would be nice
* in-line citation
* references to published sources with professional credentials(please review Wikipedia's living-person's biography policy)
CJLippert 23:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do to improve 

message: The materials under the section called “The Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria” in Greg Sarris’ biography are unsourced or poorly sourced contentious materials.  These materials are not relevant to Mr. Sarris for purposes of a biographical entry and mirror the problematic sections in the Wikipedia entry for Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria.  Please see rules on Wikipedia: Biographies of living persons.  Please also see my comments on the talk page entry under “The Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria” where I explain why that article in its current form violates a host of Wikipedia rules.  To be consistent with Wikipedia rules and policies on biographies, particularly given the extra protections given to biographies of living persons, I strongly recommend deleting the existing content under the section in question and replacing it with something along the lines of the following:  
“Sarris serves as Chairman of the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria, a federally recognized Indian tribe with offices in Rohnert Park, California.” 
GoPerelandra (talk) 20:06, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needed Revision
Talk:Dae Jung-sang

message: The word “乞乞” may have been read either in goguryeonized reading or in Middle Chinese reading for Hanzi.
Let’s look at the Goguryeo reading for Hanzi. The personal name of the King Micheon of Goguryeo was 乙弗 (a transcription into Hanzi) or 乙弗利 (a variant transcription into Hanzi). The variation of the personal name of the Goguryeo king shows that the consonant-final sound of the character “弗” was not “T” but “L or R”. This is one of the some examples which proves that Sino-Korean reading is close to Goguryeo reading for Hanzi. For reference, “乞乞” in Sino-Korean pronunciation is [klkl]
So, I postulate that Goguryeo reading for the character “乞” was pronounced [k+(vowel)+l]. As for the Middle Chinese reading, considering the diverse reconstructions of the reading by linguists, I postulate that the Middle Chinese pronunciation for it was [k+(vowel)+t].
And the Korean native reading for “大” is exactly [kl]. Possibly [k+(vowel)+l] or  [k+(vowel)+t] was Old Korean or at least cognate with the Korean word. To the contrary, Manchu word for “大” is [amba], hardly to imagine to be cognate with above mentioned reading.
After having become the royal family of Balhae, the family of Dae Jo-yeong felt the need to create a surname which could represent their dynasty diplomatically to the neighboring countries. It is easy to imagine that their native surname meaning “great” was turned into “大” which was equivalent in meaning to “乞”
It could be a good example to study how native Korean surnames have changed into Chinese-like surnames.
Jagello (talk) 09:28, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "乞乞" was probably Old Korean or at least cognate with the Korean word. 

message: Qisi 乞四 is a Mohe/Malgal noble name which derived into a Jurchen name Chi-tzan (赤盞) and a Hungarian name Csiszar.
Sources :
* The Far-East Ancestors of the Magyars:A Historical and Linguistic Excavation (The above comments was made at 09:35, 5 June 2007 by Whlee according to wikihistory)
According to volume 113 of the "Canonical history of the Jurchen Jin Dynasty" (金史), in 1232，General 赤盏合喜 (Chizhan Hexi) guarded Kaifeng and used explosives similar to nowadays grenade to defend against Mongol's attack (「其守城之具有火炮名『震天雷』者，铁礶盛药，以火点之，炮起火发，其声如雷，闻百里外，所爇围半亩之上，火点著甲铁皆透」。).  The general 赤盏合喜's ancestral line is unknown, but very likely from this Qisi family.--Jiejunkong 04:16, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Etymology" of Qisi (Piyu)
Talk:Nammo

message: Here is a source for more info on all three of the rockets in the North Star rocket family, the North Star 1 and North Star 2 "green" sounding rockets and also the North Star Launch Vehicle (NSLV), the orbital launcher capable of placing 10kg nanosats into polar orbit:
* NorthStar rocket family, January 2013.
Cheers.  N2e (talk) 18:22, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for more info on the Nammo orbital launch vehicle 

message: I added citations directly from Nammo's website to corroborate the claims of their ammunition products. I could not find two of the listed types in the handbook (I have commented them out in case somebody else finds them later). I also removed the internal links for ammunition types that do not have their own articles to clean up the page. Removed citation needed tag. AndersLeo (talk) 14:45, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation Tag Removed