lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Beaumaris Castle

message: Sadly I am not familiar with Beaumaris, and the word "exhibition" links to a disambiguation page.  I have (more out of guesswork than anything) opted for art exhibition, but I realise it may also include trade fairs.  If so, please don't link to disambiguation again, as it also includes stuff on scholarships and Xzibit which, I would imagine, have nothing to do with Beaumaris.  If needs be, please say that it hosts art exhibitions and other conventions.
LeeG 14:38, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Exhibition]] disambiguation

message: Anybody know any specifics on that tag?  I think it reads quite well... Lordjim13 23:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was slapped on by an IP in April - this compares the state of the article immediately pre-tagging and now.  I think it's fine for present purposes too, so will detag.  BencherliteTalk 23:37, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy Editing?

message: I've gone through and expanded the article a bit, including adding in some of the latest research. I think everything is now referenced etc. A couple of bits to note:
*"Beaumaris Castle was positioned to face the royal llys at Abergwyngregyn " - I couldn't find a reference for this claim, so I took it out for now.
*"Roland de Velville, a reputed son of King Henry VII of England" - his reputed son status is contested in various works, so I've strengthened the referencing to him, but taken out the reputed son point, which isn't linked by the sources to his presence at Beaumaris.
*"Attackers of Beaumaris Castle would have met 14 separate obstacles" - this is uncited but seems to be a misreading of a bit in Taylor, and I've removed the claim.
*"hot oil could be poured over enemy forces" - this is a bit of a canard in literature about castles, and as it was uncited I've removed it. Hchc2009 (talk) 07:37, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion...
Talk:Asteroid Belt (album)

message: I'm not sure of what genre this album is. Velvet chain seem to cover several different genres.
Also, the guest musicians I've just listed track nos for their contributions, mainly to save typing. Would it be better to type out in full the track names? EsonLinji
Just citing sources. The info here is taken from the liner notes as well as the official web site. EsonLinji 07:18, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:President of the American Association for the Advancement of Science

message: Does anyone object to reducing the descriptive text in the introduction? Specifically, I propose removing the paragraph:
:"The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), founded in 1848, is the world's ... with membership open to everyone."
and replacing it with one or two sentences, such as the following - copied, in part, from the main AAAS wiki page:
:"The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) is a general scientific society.  The most recent Constitution of the AAAS, enacted on January 1, 1973, establishes that the governance of the AAAS is accomplished in part by a President and a Board of Directors."
That would avoid the descriptive text that is better found and better cited in the main AAAS wiki page. It would also set the stage for the current 2nd paragraph, which describes the President's term & how they become the Chair of the Board.
Aphzidos (talk) 19:01, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: Any objects to the removal of the descriptions of 2008, 2009, and 2010 presidents? 
:"The 2008 president of AAAS was..."
That doesn't seem very relevant. I also suspect the name of the current president (Fedoroff), when added, should be accompanied by details about her dates of presidency and leave the rest to the Fedoroff and AAAS pages. Any arguments? Aphzidos (talk) 19:07, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Descriptions of Recent Presidents 

message: The years used to refer to AAAS President's is confusing due to AAAS convention. As stated correctly in an earlier edit, now removed:
"In accordance with the convention used by the AAAS, presidents are referenced based on the year in which they left office."
So McCarthy should be McCarthy, President 2009, not 2008, which is the year he became president. Agre, elected in 2009, is considered Agre (2010)... unless that would be unduly confusing to the reader. AAAS employee (talk) 14:59, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Years
Category talk:Operas

message: What do you all think of the idea of a :Category:Operas by language subcategory? --Sketchee 09:41, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
Seems like a great idea; it's a beginning to what should be a larger wikiproject on opera. Wish I knew how to create it.Jahenderson 01:14, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Koichi Tohei

message: I have not compared the texts thoroughly, but some sentences - like "Tohei saw action in China and was stranded there at the end of the war until his repatriation in 1946" - are identical to the entry in Stanley Pranin's Encyclopedia of Aikido. . // Habj 00:24, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey its me Fred26 on a different comp. :) Sorry for the late reply, I've put my focus on Shinto Muso-ryu so Tohei doesn't get all my attention anymore. Anyways, I honestly dont remember adding that above mentioned text, it was prolly someone else. When I first added the article I had practically zero info on his war-years so I left it empty. 217.209.26.241 10:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio? 

message: Hello, could anyone know if Tohei sensei is still alive or dead because there are no more reports or articles about what Koichi Tohei is doing today, THANK YOU!!!Aikido Philippines (talk) 16:44, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tohei Sensei today 
Talk:First-sale doctrine

message: It seems there are more cases and sources, see:
:
:
You can help by expanding on the article using these sources. --Hm2k (talk) 01:21, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Find sources

message: Reporting an error here. From the way I look at it, the textbooks were unlawfully imported into the U.S. by people the defendant knew. This doesn't restrict a person's ability to resell a work that was created outside the U.S., then imported into the States with permission. 68.173.113.106 (talk) 23:32, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''John Wiley & Sons Inc. v. Kirtsaeng'' (2011) 

message: The article states, that 
: the same 9th Circuit panel that decided Vernor v. Autodesk, refused to apply Vernor's three-factor test in UMG v. Augusto
However, the way I see it, the court did apply the test; UMG did not impose any restrictions on the "use" of the work, so when the court applied the test, the third criterium didn't apply, so the licensing relationship was not created.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.212.53.248 (talk) 23:34, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  UMG v. Augusto confusion 

message: Is it clear why this is called "First Sale" doctrine?  Not to me.  Doesn't the same right to re-sell apply to the 2nd sale of a copyrighted item?  Gherson2 (talk) 21:56, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll have to see if I can find a WP:RS that makes this explicit... but the doctrine means that the copyright holder can exercise its exclusive right to distribute a particular copy of a work only for the first distribution of that copy, i.e., the copy's "first sale". After that, the recipient, and further downstream recipients, of that same copy can resell it without authorization from the copyright holder. The first sale doctrine means that copyright only covers that first sale of the physical article, and not the second, third, etc. sales. TJRC (talk) 23:05, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

text: I have added an explanation here. TJRC (talk) 23:25, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "first sale"?
Category talk:American people by occupation

message: Which is the preferred form for new categories - U.S. jobholders, United States jobholders, or American jobholders? I see all three in use.  -Willmcw 11:15, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It has now been agreed to use "American" across the board. CalJW 17:34, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier
Talk:Extended ASCII

message: Ignore for a moment the OR tag and absence of any sourcing, but the section "Usage in computer-readable languages" is a mess. I attempted to clean it up but on reflection, concluded that it would be wiser to get a text teased out here in talk space first. This is as far as I've got with the first para:
This is still not clear. A document written in Cyrillic, for example, will use many bytes from the top 128 (as well as a few from the base ASCII set. HTML syntax is in English, not just ASCII. This text is just confusing to the general reader; either it needs a lot of work or should just be deleted.
The second para is barely literate:
What a mess.
* "Lots of software"? "mangle non-ASCII text"?? (I think this means "would fail to process bytes in the 0x80 to 0xFF range".)
* "Supporting extended ASCII forced the compilers to be fixed to preserve the bytes in the source unchanged." Nonsense: a compiler processes code written according to the language specification, which has standardised instructions. Syntax using any incorrect syntax is flagged as erroneous. Sorry, but this just reads as meaningless waffle. Does it have any redeeming features? 
I propose that we delete the whole section and not waste any more time on it. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 16:46, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleted, with the fact that extended ascii did help UTF-8 moved to the intro section. Spitzak (talk) 19:01, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Usage in computer-readable languages"
Talk:Shamone

message: Thank god this was kept, because I needed to know.  LOL! Etoile 20:22, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First AfD

message: "often used coupled with an expletive, such as 'Shamone mother f-----'". Bad dicdef (or whatever, but doesn't belong here). utcursch 11:59, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
*Tentative Keep. People watching something like Bo' Selecta! for the first time will be wondering what it means, like me. Xezbeth 12:50, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
*Not sure it really exists outside Bo Selecta, in which case it should be merged. Kappa 16:15, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Shamone]]
Talk:Military of Australia

message: made into a root page. -- Zondor 08:07, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't a root page supposed to have a common introduction to the topic? I'm still reading the idea, and think I dislike it, but that shouldn't stop you from doing it if you think it helps.  --Scott Davis Talk 10:20, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I meant this to be an index page rather than root page, actually. -- Zondor 11:11, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's a :Category:Topic lists. -- Zondor 11:36, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: root page

message: :category:Military of Australia claims this is the main article. This index/root page does not make compelling reading for a main article. As the main article, I want to tag it as importance=Top, but I can't in good conscience. Perhaps it should return to a redirect to Australian Defence Force. Comments? --Scott Davis Talk 13:14, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fully support.--cj | talk 06:21, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, this page is basically a list of ADF stuff anyway. Unless we get some articles on defence prior to the ADF, then this page could be useful. --Peta 12:42, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: I'm going to edit this into an article. Feedyourfeet 09:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  article
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Alberuni/Evidence

message: I must say "Evidence presented by Pename" gave me a good laugh :) Here are some examples of abuse by this guy "Pename" himself. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:134.22.70.218
:my formal response is: Dear Ta bu shi da yu & Islamania Cabal, fuck you and the horse you rode in on. Sincerely, ANONYMOUS.
:go fuck yourself. stop sending me pointless personal messages if you don't want to be attacked.
:"have a think" <--- ahaha ... unlettered moron
Notice the capitalized "ANONYMOUS" above. This guy used to post with the ID Pename but after RFC was posted against him for abuse, he gave up that ID and became "ANONYMOUS" again. The guy is anti-Islamic POV pusher and abuser himself. I suggest to ignore the "evidence" by this abuser. OneGuy 13:21, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evidence presented by Pename
Category talk:Fijian golfers

message: Isn't this somewhat redundant in terms of a category? A category should gather the same types. If someone else can name ONE more prominent FIjian golfer... Else let's go to tiger woods and add the category half thai golfers etc....--Malbear 13:30, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No it isn't redundant because it is the only way of placing him in an appropriate category within golfers and Fijian people in one hit.
*Yeah, I've been making sure every athlete has a (nationality/sport) entry, and this will create some single-shot combinations. Can't be helped. (Of course, should anyone create a Dinesh Chand entry, this category will have two inhabitants.)--Mike Selinker 16:17, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Nafaanra language/to do

message: # Grammar: Tense and aspect.
# Grammar: Example sentences
# Grammar: Noun classes & syllable structure
# Grammar: Basic word order
# Grammar: Questions
# Demography: bilinguality and literacy
# Check for EAL issues (Thanks Bishonen!)
Last update:  — mark ✎ 23:43, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Gurpreet Kaur Bhatti

message: Much of the content of this page overlaps with that in the article Behzti - maybe it would be worth moving the bulk of the material on this page about the Behzti controversy there? Qwghlm 13:49, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
:I agree. Go ahead --SqueakBox 16:48, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
:: There seems to be a WP:BLP1E issue here. --RoadAhead =Discuss= 21:54, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: the award would seem to overcome that WP:CREATIVE "The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work". pohick (talk) 16:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ok, i believe that Gurpreet Kaur is a different person, bio details of this person frankensteined onto their article; restored to 2008 version there. Slowking4 (talk) 22:09, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: merge
Talk:James Q. Wilson

message: The article lists a long list of qualifications but should summarize who James Q. Wilson is in one sentence. E.g. James Q. Wilson is a well known criminologist. Kevinp2 21:22, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Has he ever held a chair in a department of criminology? If not, then it would be better to say that he has done influential research on crime. The first sentence could be a little cleaner, but it's really not that bad, ie. he is a professor of public policy at Pepperdine and professor emritus at UCLA. --Beaker342 00:02, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Who is he?

message: From this article: "A recent report by the Pew Center on the States asserts that America incarcerates too many people and in the process diverts money from higher education. Wilson notes that the report does not examine whether the slower growth of public spending on higher education than on prisons may be explained by the surge in private support for public universities. And, Wilson dryly adds, the report does not explore 'whether society gets as much from universities as it does from prisons.' A good question, but not one apt to be studied in academia." I found it funny and interesting. This may or may not be appropriate or useful for the article. --Emesee (talk) 19:27, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  quote... 

message: *
*
have a lot of info that could be used to fill out this article. --Javaweb (talk) 07:21, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obits 
Talk:Tea Tree Gully, South Australia

message: With this TTG article, are we talking about the small suburb or the large City / council area? I could contribute a lot with regards to the City of TTG, but the suburb is another matter.
[maestro] 14:56, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: this one's the suburb  -there's a link in it to the city. --Scott Davis Talk 15:05, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suburb or city?

message: Should tea tree be disambiguated to Leptospermum, Melaleuca or something else? --Scott Davis Talk 15:05, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Only if someone can determine which tree the suburb name refers to. I read the history book by Ian Auhl a while ago but can't remember which species caught the early settlers interest so - Peripitus (Talk) 04:12, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tea tree
Talk:Soviet Union/Archive 2

message: We have now the English name, the Russian name, and TWO transliterations. Perhaps we can remove one of the transliterations?
----
Weren't all the languages of the member SSRs official languages? The coat of arms contains 14 languages Dmn 14:37, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It was the thumbnail that was 6K - the full image is less than 2K. This suggests a rule of thumb[nails]: don't use a thumbnail if it has a larger filesize than the full image. --Zundark 08:32, 10 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many names!
Talk:Tommy Tutone

message: Does the link on "Jim Keller" point to the right person?--S.Camus 07:14, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Right Jim Keller

message: The name of the song referred to up front is "867-5309/Jenny" not "Jenny", as shown later in this article. mjd--71.126.132.169 (talk) 01:31, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Song name

message: What's the origin of the band name? Who is Tommy Tutone? Thanks, Maikel (talk) 10:02, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Band name
Talk:Whitehall rowboat

message: When I saw the name of this type of boat I assumed it was named after the whitehall steps, on the Thames, near Westminster.  Small, oar-powered boats had been used on the Thames for  hundreds of years.  Whitehall steps, near the seat of government, was one of the loading points.  Is the original author sure that these boats are named after a street in NYC? Geo Swan 17:32, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: has repeatedly added a paragraph about the organization "Rocking the Boat" and their project to use traditional wooden boatbuilding as a youth development activity. While I applaud this project, I don't believe it deserves mention at this article for several reasons:
# the organization itself is not demonstrated to be notable;
# there is no reliable source to indicate that this organization is building Whitehall rowboats (not all wooden boats are Whitehall rowboats).
Since Mlettera has restored this content several times without discussion, and since I would like to avoid an edit war on the subject, I am opening this discussion to get input on the matter. I believe the material should be deleted. I invite opinions from others. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:49, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the lack of engagement by , I have removed the content again. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:13, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rocking the Boat 

message: :: I too would wish to rock the boat. I am not clear after reading this article as to why Whitehall boats should be considered. Indeed, after careful reading, I realise that I do not know what a Whitehall boat is. This article needs clarification and focus. 78.114.97.77 (talk) 19:26, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rocking the boat [2]
Talk:List of English words of Australian Aboriginal origin

message: This page needs to be reclassified or heavily edited, as nearly all the words listed are not used commonly in English. They may be commonly used in Australian English, and a few of those Australian English words are used commonly in English, such as "boomerang". Perhaps this should be moved to List of Australian English words of Australian Aboriginal Origin.
Tritium6 17:57, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: 2004 Comment

message: There's a new poll here that would (hopefully) end all this "Indigenous" vs. "Aborigine" controversy. Feel free to vote. Zarbat 09:23, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: The :Category:Australian Aboriginal words and phrases gives this page as the main article. The Category has just been renamed, but I think I see another problem. I realise this is the english language wiki but the named could be more accurate.  - Fred 13:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Associated category 

message: This article implies "boondocks" is of Australian Aboriginal origin, while the "boondocks" article says it is of Tagalog origin. Which is correct?  206.9.215.136 (talk) 15:40, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict about word origin 

message: In this discussion it was decided that 3 categories should be listified and deleted.  These categories and the articles currently in them (as of 2/3/2013) are listed below.  Articles that are already linked from this article asterisked.
Pages in :Category:Dharuk words and phrases
* Boomerang *
* Burrawang         (since removed from category)
* Dingo *
* Koala *
* Kurrajong *
* Mulgoa         (since removed from category)
* Toongabbie (disambiguation)         (since removed from category)
* Wallaby *
* Waratah *
* Winmalee, New South Wales
* Woomera (spear-thrower) *
Pages in :Category:Nyungar words and phrases
* Gilgie *
* Kylie (name) *
* Quokka *
Pages in :Category:Yagara words and phrases
* Currawong *
* Dillybag
* Humpy *
* Yakka *
DexDor (talk) 07:34, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content of categories being deleted 

message: Growing up in Western Australia I heard the word 'Boondi' used to name a small projectile, believe this of Aboriginal origin, as in 'Boondi Rock' postcode 6429 Tradimus (talk) 10:51, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: others

message: I know the whole article is sparsely referenced. But this section seems to me to be completely worthless without references that show that said false assumption is common. (cf Talk:List of common misconceptions - criteria 2 and 4). I was tempted to be BOLD and simply delete it, but thought I should bring it up at the talk page first. --ColinFine (talk) 18:44, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be a valid assumption. Looking for references seems a good place to start. Most of this should be easily sourceable Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:51, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  English words often falsely assumed to be of Australian Aboriginal origin
Talk:Soul of a New Machine

message: Sorry to ask but what does that even mean? the album is part of a sentence from a book, play, etc? please explain. −₪ÇɨгcaғucɨҲ₪  kaiden  20:00, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  An album named with a sentence?
Talk:Demanufacture (album)

message: So an instrumental version of Demanufacture was used in the game Carmageddon?  Is there any way to get a hold of that instrumental version?  Don't get me wrong; I love Burton's vocals, but an instrumental Demanufacture would be incredible to listen to.... Drev19
:Oh it is great, it's my favourite game soundtrack, the perfect mix of Game and Music, I just wish I knew where my damn CD was.BathTub 15:16, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instrumental version? 

message: The present version of this article suggests that two mixes were made at the same time, one by Colin Richardson and one by Monte Conner, and that the latter's was chosen. This comes as quite a surprise, given that the 2005 Demanufacture re-release credits Greg Reely, Rhys Fulber and Fear Factory for the final mix, and the liner notes mention that this mix was made due to the rejection of Richardson's mix. At no point is it ever said that Conner mixed the album. I am going to rewrite the section concerning the two mixes of the album, as the present information is highly inaccurate. - 81.111.209.147 (talk) 04:24, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mix 