lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Abdelhamid Kermali

message: That whole Zidane bit is not true. Interviews with Algerian players at the time have proven this. This includes 2 of his teammates at AS Cannes who were Algerian, they said they talked to the Algerian FA about a promising Algerian youngster in their squad but the Algerian FA never bothered checking him out! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TonyStarks (talk • contribs).
:I am not sure whether it is true or false but i have a reference . If you have the reference to the interviews please bring it. Cheers -- Szvest  Wiki me up ® 15:35, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:City of Busselton

message: While I was in Busselton I read one of the local newspapers, the Shire of Busselton is eligable to change to "City of ...." currently they are considering Geograph, Vasse, Busselton and forth option that escapes my memory. Gnangarra 01:51, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change soon 
Talk:Battle of Birch Coulee

message: All accounts mention mounted Rangers when there were no mounted units mustered into service in Minnesota until after this Battle.  Additionally, all regular Army Cavalry had been withdrawn from frontier for service against the Southern rebellion.Mcb133aco (talk) 17:13, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: I added the unbalanced tag to this article as it lacks motivation or explanation for attacks by the Dakota people or any sort of "aftermath" that pertains to them. This conflict had two sides and only one side is represented here.  oncamera  (talk page) 11:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unbalanced
Talk:Plan Táctico y Estratégico de la Guerra

message: I believe TEG stands, actually, for Plan Tactico y Estrategico de la Guerra, which would be translated into Plan of War Strategy and Tactics or War Strategy Plan and Tactics. Why the P for Plan is not abbreviated, I do not understand (this would be interesting to note). But you can trust my sources since 1) I'm an Argentine person, 2) I know spanish as my primary language (Obviously) 3) I am in posession of a version of the game, and at the very side of the box, it says T.E.G.    Plan Tactico y Estrategico de la Guerra. Also, I believe this article should be more than a stub, so if I find any more information, I'll be glad to share it. Please tell me if I can edit this or if someone else will.Slartibartfast1992 04:15, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been two years... what about that promess? --Againme (talk) 16:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can I edit this?
Talk:Supergene (geology)

message: see google result:  
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Leonard G. (talk • contribs) 04:15, 3 December 2006
:Er... I'd reckon not. Or I might say: what the hell?, of course those words will show up in random arrangement in most any ore geology text. I'd suggest looking for a direct matching sentence or line in your copyvio searching.
:The article was written from off the top of my head backed up by the referenced text. I've never seen the book in your google search link. Now it seems you could have simply asked me where I got the info rather than slapping a copyvio accusation here. Cheers, Vsmith 19:36, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio?
Talk:Birds of North America (book)

message: price statement appropriate because there's a very high institutional price and a very modest individual one ($40/year). Unusual and notable. DGG 04:17, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your updates.  I attempted to fix some of the links under Reviews.  Calltech 16:48, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Prudence Bushnell

message: Added biographical info along with public domain (State Dept.) photo. Surprised to see there was no page on the Ambassador, considering her deep involvement in Rwanda and the Kenyan Embassy Bombings. --Mhatchett 04:24, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Regis Cordic

message: Rated
No mention of Mediocre cigarettes or Poindexter's Grebes? 75.5.228.202 (talk) 12:16, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I ran across this article some time ago, and was very disappointed that the Rege Cordic website had apparently disappeared. I even made some attempts to contact Rege's family to see if I could help keep the site alive. It is nice to see that it's back, maybe with a different host and proprietor. Lou Sander (talk) 04:55, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cordic Web Site 
Talk:The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Trill (The Legend of Zelda). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 5#Trill (The Legend of Zelda) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.   -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 04:39, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Trill (The Legend of Zelda)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: In the initial blurb of this article, the word "remaster" links to the article for Video game remake, despite there being a clear distinction between a "remake" and a "remaster" (which is actually discussed in the latter). Surely it would make more sense to instead link to Remaster (video game), which is a much more accurate description of the concept? --84.13.56.227 (talk) 06:17, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Sergecross73 msg me 14:54, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remake vs Remaster - wrong link destination?
Talk:Pontiac Sunfire

message: What is it about?  RCNesland (talk) 20:29, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Front [[Fascia (car)]] 

message: The Sunfire was replaced by the G5. The G6 was the replacement for the Grand Am.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.200.32.36 (talk) 13:32, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacement 

message: So what does the GT stand for in the Pontiac Sunfire? 2604:3D09:A780:2C00:346E:315:65DB:2324 (talk) 05:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: "GT" is a widely used trim level name which generally suggests higher performance or sportier handling. It's also a racing category for production-based race cars.  For the origin of "GT", see grand tourer. --Vossanova o< 17:56, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:City of Karratha

message: It's now apparently the City of Karraha
* http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-07-01/karratha-becomes-a-city/5563546
* http://www.roebourne.wa.gov.au/ also says so...
Mitch Ames (talk) 09:59, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Happy to help! The Drover's Wife (talk) 12:13, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: My gosh, that was fast work! And I see updates happening on linked  pages .... well done, all! Kerry (talk) 23:01, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  City of Karratha
Talk:Gija

message: This article needs a lot of work, as it currently reads like South Korean revisionist propaganda. The "sources" cited in this article are from far-right South Korean message boards (naver.com etc).  The evidence provided to discredit Gija's Chinese relations is weak and does not match the extremely biased conclusions and strong assertions made in the article.  --Mamin27 04:40, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that IP is an apparent sockpuppet of User:Hairwizard91, who managed to leave an impressive swath of destruction across :Category:History of Korea before suddenly disappearing.  I should note that the sources cited are not entirely trivial (although the format needs some work and the use made of them is questionable)...  the Naver encyclopedia is a legitimate mirror of the fairly reliable Dusan World Encyclopedia.  -- Visviva 09:50, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This article reads like Korean propaganda

message: Hi,
I've re-redirected this page to Jizi, without prejudice for what the correct name might be.  This was part of an old cut-and-paste move, which was followed by extensive insertions of OR and POV-pushing.  If there is anything salvageable in the history of Gija, please feel free to salvage it and include it in the Jizi article.  If anyone believes this article should be at "Gija" rather than "Jizi" -- I personally don't care one way or the other -- please use the process at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Cheers, -- Visviva 06:08, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoration
Talk:Clan Macnaghten

message: The page Clan MacNaughton is almost identical. Internet sources seem to indicate both spellings are used; since MacNaghten is the spelling of the Clan Chief (according to both articles) I suggest this article remain. 76.211.18.221 04:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody's expressed any objections so I went ahead and moved it 130.101.100.143 14:04, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: The article has been tagged since 2007! as having a lack of inline citations. I will therefore shortly be rewriting it with inline citations. I will leave in any existing well sourced information.QuintusPetillius (talk) 16:43, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article re-write
Talk:Beltzhoover (Pittsburgh)

message: How does this help to illustrate this article? And why the vague building date? Where does that come from? --Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 22:23, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Houses picture 
Talk:Bloomfield (Pittsburgh)

message: I think the history section for this article warrants review. The line quoted below appears to be without citation and as such also appears to carry a degree of bias or of capriciousness. This phrasing should be either modified or removed from the article. 
"The land here was stolen from the native Delaware tribe by Casper Taub, one of the area's earliest European settlers."
I've done a little bit more searching and this particular phrase appears to come directly from this twitter post. This appears to be POV and should likely be removed or modified from its current form. --199.234.67.50 (talk) 20:59, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited claim regarding land theft 
Talk:Mercur, Utah

message: Note that the "Sacramento mine" on the aerial photo may be the current Mercur gold mine. Cheers, 
Pete Tillman (talk) 16:50, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The old Sacramento Mine appears to be on the SW edge of the current Barrick Mercur open pit: http://www.mindat.org/maps.php?id=17197 --or in it, depending on how recent this topo is.   Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 16:52, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed the caption. See the mining Utah page. Vsmith (talk) 02:10, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of mine?
Talk:Oregon AFL–CIO

message: This is a very well-written article, however, the intro reads rather like an advertisement, and may not reflect a neutral point of view. Katr67 05:22, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There are still a few instances of cut and paste from  that need to be reworked.  The list of affiliates seems off-topic, insofar as it is a list of other unions affiliated with national AFL-CIO, and could be better "Oregonized" by listing locals rather than national unions. The article topic meshes well with projects I've taken on, and I am glad for the contribution. -- J-M Jgilhousen 10:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
Talk:Francis the Talking Mule

message: If Francis was a female mule then wouldn't she technically be considered a hinny and not a mule? 129.74.91.57 (talk) 18:09, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Over a year late, but for the record, Francis the character is a male mule, as mentioned many times (in the film Francis Covers the Big Town, it's even mentioned that "Frances with an e" would be a female name, and when queried further about his gender, Francis quips "Do I sound like a soprano to you?") Also, a hinny isn't a term used for gender but based on parentage (horse as father and donkey as mother, while it's reversed with mules). Both mules and hinnies, once bred, can be either gender, so Francis the character is a male mule and Molly, the actual animal used, is a female mule. -- Aleal (talk) 19:43, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gender? 

message: Probably needs to be moved to the fictional mules category Ealdgyth | Talk 19:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories

message: The article says "With a plot device like the later series Mister Ed, Francis would usually only talk to Peter". My concern is with the word "later" here; while the Mr. Ed TV series came later than the Frances film series, the original Ed material were prose stories that started in magazines in the 1930s, predating all versions of Frances. However, I have not read these stories, and do not know if talks-only-to-one-person aspect of Ed is present in those prose stories or not. As such, while I know that a rewording is needed here, I'm not sure what the proper wording would be. --Nat Gertler (talk) 12:55, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to Mister Ed 

message: This Flickr album has a number of newspaper clippings that go over Francis, would make for good additional research. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 03:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useful sources
Talk:Central Northside

message: It seems that there is a significant overlap between this article and the article Mexican War Streets, possibly because this one does not provide much information about the rest of the Central Northside.  Now, arguably, there isn't any "rest" of the CNS outside the War Streets; in that case, I'd suggest the two be merged.  Otherwise, they need to be differentiated better.  Isaac (talk) 20:23, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlap with [[Mexican War Streets]] 

message: I think at this point, it's fair to drop the "Also known as Allegheny City Central" bit at the top of this article.  The "Name" section of the article explains what branding consultants attempted to do, but in reality, the name of the neighborhood is and will continue to be "Central Northside", especially since the whole "Allegheny City Central" thing failed to gain any traction.  I vote we drop the text at the top but leave the "Name" section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.32.85.226 (talk) 14:59, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:East Allegheny

message: please add more about history for this article. ThanksBachfanwang 14:59, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More!
Talk:Roud, Isle of Wight

message: While not wrong most of the wikilinks in this stub need disambiguating, there are several King Edwards and more Nigels. Saga City 05:00, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes you are right. This stub needs work. And I am the first to admit it, even though most of what is written so far came from me. What I want to do  is to at least have a few rudimentary stubs for most of the towns, villages, hamlets and other locations of interest on the Isle of Wight. Some of these require quit a bit of digging to fill in, but hopefully eventually they wiill get cleaned up and more facts added.--Filll 06:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Hamiltons

message: It is obscene and inappropriate to put on Wikipedia.  Little kids go on Wikipedia sometimes!  Plus, R-ratings do not stop those same little kids from watching it if it is their parents' movie, thus providing a reason to look at the article.  This needs to be partially blocked out with a black bar or something.  -BlueCaper (talk) 21:43, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia_is_not_censored. Don't know what your  personal definition of obscene is, but in my opinion, it like beauty is often in the eye of the beholder. The image is from a poster from the film. Not everyone would agree with you that it should be blocked from view. My suggestion would be if you have children you don't think should see certain images, that you supervise their internet experience so as to guide them.   Dlohcierekim  22:26, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Poster image censorship needed

message: Although The Hamiltons is described as such in several Wikipedia-articles, I can't find any indication that it is a "highly-acclaimed" film or that it won anything at either the Santa Barbara International Film Festival or the Malibu International Film Festival. I've tagged the Hamilton-claims with "citation needed" and suggest that unless verified they be removed. --Minutae (talk) 11:04, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "highly-acclaimed winner"
Talk:Long Beach Harbor Patrol

message: Since the references you summarize the breakdown of the historical background of Long Beach Harbor, you don't need any more sources as those you provided reliable and don't contain any bias. Initially, I learned from the sources you referenced that the transporting oil was high in demand, therefore they had to expand the port to bring revenue into the markets. Geologists and field professionals that would inspect for oil spills that have been a delicate issue to this day. The timeline of the construction of the port to managing the environmental impact is sufficient information for readers to understand. The information you provided about the police patrol terminals was specific about the factors for protecting the port.  
Jujiberry (talk) 15:27, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ginkgo Petrified Forest State Park

message: I have edited the list of petrified trees found at the park. Several of the species listed were not listed by anyother source and seemed unlikely for climatic and biogeographic reasons (breadfruit, cinammon, teak). Another species (tropical gum) appeared to be based on a confusion over common names (petrified sweetgum is found in the park). Based on my visit to the parks interpretive trail I verified the first nine species on the current list. Although 50 species have supposedly been found there, I was not able to find out what the other species were (the interpretive center was closed). I therefore left six species on the list that seem possible based on climate and biogeography (the latter six species on the current list), but if someone has a full list of the trees found there, please doublecheck them. Thanks, Justinleif 03:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Petrified tree species

message: I uploaded a photo of this park's entrance (including the lovely petrified log!) here: 
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Ginkgopark.jpg
But canNOT get it to work using the syntax that I got from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Images ... which I interpreted as  
What I am doing wrong?  I will be happy to re-up-load my photo directly into wikipedia, but I understood wikimedia was preferred. rewinn 05:17, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All that you need to put is  on the page, and the picture from Commons is automatically put on. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 05:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - that was easy! 216.254.10.236 06:33, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo of park: upload problems

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support the move is at least an improvement, if someone comes up with a better alternative then Talkpage me please, thanks. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:32, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect George F. Beck (geologist). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Utopes (talk) 00:43, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "George F. Beck (geologist)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 
Talk:Gapsin Coup

message: This article should be renamed "Kapsin Coup" as per WP:UCN.--Niohe 05:29, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Does WP:UCN specify anything about foreign titles? I don't find any. (Wikimachine 20:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If "the event is known as the "Gapsin Coup" (or "Kapsin Coup") in English." is true, then we should use that per WP:UCN. Transliterated Korean name should only be used when there's no English name per WP:ENGLISH. --Kusunose 23:12, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This article should be renamed

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support a move to Gapsin Coup per WP:UE (for the "Coup" part) and WP:MOS-KO for the romanization: "Korean words transliterated into English should use the Revised Romanization, unless they are used in specifically North Korean context."  Coup of 1884 is an ambiguous less better option but is still preferable to the current title.  (More sources may use "Coup of 1884" but I would hazard that these instances are in a context of Korean history and not in more general works like an encyclopedia. —   AjaxSmack    17:37, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Septum

message: "Septum" isn't only used in biology; it's also used for a piece of laboratory equipment in chemistry. There isn't all that much to say about it, but it's still common enough to be deserving of a Wikipedia article. I can't really figure out a good place in the current article to add it to, though. It seems slightly excessive to create a separate article for it to link to that, as the article would start out very short. - Alltat (talk) 20:45, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Other uses of the term

message: This text was previously under both the chemistry and the histology sections, but there is presently no accompanying image:
The yellow portion is made of flexible cartilage, the quadrangular cartilage. The blue portion is thin bone, the perpendicular plate of the ethmoid bone. The purple portion is thicker bone, the vomer bone.
Adrian J. Hunter 05:24, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Text describing non-existent image

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Move to septum.  Septum already redirects to septum (anatomy) and there is no ambiguity in the term.  Also, move septum (disambiguation) to septa (disambiguation) since the only other listing there is SEPTA.  —  AjaxSmack  22:28, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Template talk:Unbalanced opinion

message: This template seems to be misused a bit.  The proper response to non-neutral statements is to remove or rephrase them, not add more POV. Should it even exist? Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 05:26, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose?

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Inline templates.  I've been meaning to do this for a while. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 16:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Wikiproject Inline templates'' proposed