Talk:Arundel Castle

message: What about the 4 ghosts living in the castle? there should be some reference  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.17.252.156 (talk) 00:33, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ghosts 

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*  Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
*  Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[?]
*NA  You may wish to consider adding an appropriate infobox for this article, if one exists relating to the topic of the article. [?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
*  As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of (if such appeared in the article) using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.[?]
*  Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with articles ('the', 'a(n)'). For example, if there was a section called ==The Biography==, it should be changed to ==Biography==.[?]
*  Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
**Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant -  “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
**“In the year [of] 1138”
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, MortimerCat (talk) 00:02, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Automated peer review 

message: Substituted at 08:22, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Arundel Castle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100329161358/http://www.arundelcastle.org:80/_pages/02_gardens.htm to http://www.arundelcastle.org/_pages/02_gardens.htm/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:33, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The second paragraph of the lead opens with "From the 11th century, the castle has served as a home and has been in the ownership of the family of the Duke of Norfolk for over 400 years." Obviously this needs to be reworded.
The article details that with a few reversions to the crown followed by restorations to the family, the castle has remained in the same family since 1135 - the 12th century, not the 11th. It did not actually come into Norfolk hands until 1580 when the title of Earl of Arundel was inherited by Philipp Howard from his maternal grandfather. Philipp was the son of the 4th Duke of Norfolk and great-grandfather to the 5th duke (the title was in abeyance from 1572-1660). It would be correct to say the castle has served as a home of the ancestors of the Dukes of Norfolk, though it did not actually belong to the Howard family until 1580 and was not the home of a Duke of Norfolk until 1660 when the title was restored.
So... how should we reword this?  History Lunatic (talk) 16:49, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing lead 

message: The numbering for the Earls of Arundel here and elsewhere seems to be completely screwed up.  The page John Fitzalan, 7th Earl of Arundel I think is correct that the 7th Earl was born in 1408.  But you've started numbering from someone much earlier making the one who died in 1272 also 7th Earl.
The book "The Fitzalans" by Michael Burtscher, ISBN9787904396949 says Richard I Fitzalan, born 1267, was the first to be styled Earl of Arundel. -Hunting dog (talk) 14:32, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earls of Arundel