lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Martin Fry

message: The Seventh Taylor 00:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial section

message: Were ABC really a "New Wave" group? Often the term New Wave gets used as if it were a synonym for punk rock, and I would hardly have thought that ABC were in the same category of pop music as groups such as the Sex Pistols, the Stranglers, the Boomtown Rats, the Clash or Sham 69. I would have thought that it would be more accurate to describe them as a New Romantic group. This was the wing which influenced a lot of pop music after punk rock/New Wave had had its dominant influenced a lot of pop groups. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 19:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe this question would best be left on the ABC talk page instead? Best, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 14:10, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Were ABC really "New Wave"?

message: The opening to this article says that ABC had six singles which entered the top 20 in the U.K. singles charts in the 1980s, and then says "including"  - but goes on to name all six singles. Would it not be better to say "which were" than "including" here? Vorbee (talk) 18:21, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Six singles
Talk:Roxy Music (album)

message: Who wrote the songs ? -- Beardo 11:59, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing 

message: who was the model on the cover? Kingturtle (talk) 00:44, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As I recall, she's credited on the sleeve as Kari-Ann. BTLizard (talk) 11:53, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  who was the model on the cover? 

message: This articles suggests that Virginia Plain was not included in the original release. My 1972 Atco LP has it as track four on side one. Is this not the original release? Kingturtle (talk) 00:55, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not the original British release. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:45, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Virginia Plain
Talk:Stranded (album)

message: There is a policy discussion in progress at the Manual of Style which affects this page, suggesting that the capitalization of "like" should be removed from the songs listed here. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — LlywelynII 18:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Policy discussion in progress

message: Marilyn Cole claims that "she'd never heard of Roxy Music", then how was she Bryan Ferry's girlfriend at the time?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.224.75.67 (talk) 04:05, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  If..... 
Talk:Gerard Christopher

message: The statement in the Trivia section supposedly made by the producer makes no sense.  Both Christopher and Cain had prior acting experience.  If he was really looking for someone "who hasn't acted before," why was he reading Christopher's acting resume?  It looks like someone has misquoted the source, but since no source has been provided it cannot be verified. Canonblack 22:41, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Manifesto (Roxy Music album)

message: Further to the inspiration behind the album title as quoted in the article, it may be purely coincidental but I note the album was released in  the UK shortly before the 1979 general election, which was expected & subsequently proved to be of historic significance. Gwladys24 (talk) 00:44, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album Title 

message: The release history paragraph was not completely correct. As one can see from discogs, the first track to be replaced with its single version was "Dance Away", not "Angel Eyes". The disco re-recording of "Angel Eyes" was put in place of the album version in the mid 80s, when the album was released on CD for the first time. There are no versions of the album with the original "Dance Away" and the re-recorded "Angel Eyes": in fact most vinyl copies will have the opposite. Also, there is no evidence that the 1999 Remaster with the original "Angel Eyes" and the single "Dance Away" was a result of a mistake: as I've mentioned, this is the version of the album that most people probably had back then. Hope this clarifies. Zappafripp (talk) 20:14, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarifying on the single mixes replacing the album versions on later pressings 

message: In the article the compilation album The Complete Studio Recordings (Roxy Music album) is mentioned, but not in the template below. That's a strange omission. 83.85.143.141 (talk) 13:39, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template below
Talk:Carl Clauberg

message: This article seems mostly POV and lacks references.
POV??
Is it possible to be entirely neutral about Clauberg? Did he have any good sides???
Either way, the numbers don't add up, so i agree with the requirement of references.  it says that 700 women survived, but later says that 300 (400 LESS than the minimum) were experimented upon. Slokunshialgo 05:11, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: it woudln't of beencos of hmi joining th nazi party
at this time mmberships were flooding in and all these people weren't treated any were as near aswell as older member
taking that it out.  
I have heard of "The LSD Sterilization Plan of Nazi Germany". Was this drug developed by Clauberg with the intent of sterilizing humans? (I realize Hoffman is credited with the discovery but the evidence seems to point to Clauberg)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.169.166.127 (talk) 14:07, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  promotion 

message: All bibliographical references can be found in the german version. Alexandre Rongellion (talk) 23:20, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis

message: This article is simply too technical for a lay audience and, in its present state, would be more suited to a medical textbook. It is jargon-heavy and assumes far too much prior knowledge. 217.155.20.163 23:00, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article needs substantial rewriting at the moment. JFW | T@lk 07:59, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Yes, Churg-Strauss needs to be merged with Churg-strauss. They're the same, except for the capitalization of the s. I'd do it now if I had the know-how. Cajolingwilhelm 01:12, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge 

message: Leukotriene antagonists have been linked with CSS. This is probably due to steroid withdrawal. An anon added a 1997 report about this, but since then there have been many reports weakening the association.
The latest review, in French:
:
The article needs substantial rewriting at the moment. JFW | T@lk 07:59, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  LTA 

message: this article needs a section about symptoms, preferably by a doctor or researcher (not me) who knows what they're talking about.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 13:46, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: What are the symptoms of Churg-Strauss

message: why is it all these medical/medicine wikipedia pages are so hard to understand? I came here for general information on this syndrome and can't understand a thing I am reading.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.81.53.229 (talk) 20:35, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  layman's terms? 

message: This article really needs more about the cause of the syndrome.  Please improve!
As a Doctor and a patient with this condition - as far as I'm aware (I don't specialise in rhematological disorders such as this however) there isn't currently a known cause and therefore that would clearly be why there is not a section dedicated to it. You can just look at patient information sites such as http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/churg-strauss-syndrome/basics/causes/con-20028895 and see it states "The exact cause of Churg-Strauss syndrome is unknown.". I've read 100s of papers on this disease and there have been a range of hypothesis put forward but considering the scope and the lack of evidence behind most of these I think it stands to not include a causative section as it simply is not known.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.5.73.198 (talk) 01:10, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What causes it?
Talk:Willam Christensen

message: This article that was marked for clean-up appears to have been lifted verbatim from . It appears to be a retrospective of his life that appeared in national syndications and numerous newspapers. I'd say it's almost certainly a copyright violation. I've removed it and replaced it with a basic summery of the fellow's accomplishments, categorized and stubbed it. A Ballet fan will need to do the rest. Removed from clean-up. --Lendorien 22:56, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading 

message: I am the author of the original article on Willam Christensen. It was pulled because someone thought it constituted a copyright violation. I wrote to say that the copyright was mine because of the agreement I had with Ballet-Dance Monthly, which originally published it (ie, it was mine to publish elsewhere if I wished). It contained a lot of original research, as I was able to interview members of the Christensen family and dancers who had danced with and for him. Because of this, there was material in the article that can be found nowhere else. I was signed in the last time I asked for the article to be reinstated (or, for gosh sakes, at least *cited*), but as the one comment I got from anyone was "who wrote this?" let me identify myself. My handle for Wikipedia is Minissa. My real name and the name under which I publish is Karen Anne Webb. I notice that the person who wrote the current brief article admits that it would take a dance fan to make it more than a stub. I've been writing about dance for 25 years and was one of only 6 people in the country asked by the NEA to work on its pilot dance history project a number of years ago. I would like to redo the page from the perspective of someone who knows Christensen's work as well as anyone can who was not truly his contemporary. I realize that Wikipedia now has a style that it didn't have when I submitted the original article, and I'm happy to abide by that, but is there a way the article can be retrieved so I could have that data to work from? At this point, it's an older article and I would probably have trouble retrieving it from Ballet-Dance Monthly's archives (I placed it on Wikipedia about a year after that publication date). I can be reached by email at caros (at) xmission (dot) com. Thank you.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Minissa (talk • contribs) 01:25, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Willam Christensen original article
Talk:Carmel-by-the-Sea, California

message: Local politicians are not necessarily notable, but you may add information to a notable topic article even if that info would not be notable in and of itself. Still, I'm reluctant to add this because the article is already fairly long. But in case it might be useful, on pages 79–80 of this document from the city's website there is a list of the city's mayors from the beginning up to 2008.  Cheers, GentlemanGhost (séance) 13:56, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of mayors 

message: "carmelcalifornia.com" is an advocacy group intended to increase economic activities in California and since Wikipedia is not intended to boost tourism, I think its use is questionable. See what that group is about https://www.carmelcalifornia.com/visit-carmel-hid/ Graywalls (talk) 18:15, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV questionable source
Talk:Cheirotherium

message: This page makes no sense. It claims that these footprints are of a labyrinthodont (an early amphibian) but then says that it was related to the ancestors of the sauropods (long-necked dinosaurs). Why an archaic amphibian should be somehow more closely related to the ancestors of the sauropods than to any other early reptilian groups eludes me. Further, it then goes on to suggest that the "thumb" was common in - and I emphasize - "other archosaurs," when in fact labyrinthodonts are much more primitive than any archosaur (being part of a different clade altogether). And then it goes on to describe the tracks as resembling the foot of Ticinisuchus - a known early archosaur with no direct relationship to the labyrinthodonts. Something is awry here.
:And in addition: There is a misspelling, the correct name is Chirotherium --195.233.250.6 10:25, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, about the inconsistency - I'd be delighted for someone to reword this and find a better reference - maybe Kazvorpal can come back into this? for the information that I added, my reference was the Oxford University Museum of Natural History. On the spelling issue - the current one seems correct from a Greek derivation point of view and is the one that I have found in most sources. It obviously also appealed when the article was created. - Ballista 05:07, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, are sure about "cheirotherium" being the correct name? I checked the german wikipedia, they have only an article about Chirotherium, with description fitting the animal here marked as "cheirotherium".  The name Cheirotherium gives only 2 800 results in google (several being mirror sites of wikipedia), while Chirotherium 17 400. I have several older encyclopedias mentioning only Chirotherium when handling triassic footprints. btw, the statement about labyrinthodonts is IMHO... I found several sources on the net considering Ch(e)irotherium being a labyrinthodont, even found some ref (see below), although this animal is mostly being considered a "thecodont". Thus, I think this unfortunate sentence should be changed into: was probably a "thecodont" related to the ancestors of dinosaurs Best wishes --Dudo2 22:18, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Here is a link considering Chirotherium and Cheirotherium being synonymous. Here another one, a lengthy article about Chirotherium where Cheirotherium makes its appearance only once as a misspelling. Most notably, here is a possible olution to this debate, considering "cheirotherium" a junior synonym. --Dudo2 22:26, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I've changed the article over to Chirotherium but I've left any text problems for someone else to sort, as no time today. - Ballista 06:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Social status

message: Would someone who is qualified to please re-write this section. It needs to be re-edited by someone with a better ability to convey complex ideas clearly. For example, what does the sentence: "economic constraints tend to relax without any fundamental change in the pattern of spending" actually mean? It sounds like it means something, but in practice it is somewhat cryptic121.73.7.84 (talk) 03:09, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pierre Bourdieu section 

message: Please see my comment at Talk:Social position#Definitions need to be cited. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:05, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definitions need to be cited 

message: In my opinion the article can be greatly improved through adding a new section describing the impact that perceived social status has on interpersonal attraction in humans. The evolutionary theory behind social ranking deserves greater mention than the already existing section 'In non-human animals'. If no one objects I would like to work on such a section in the coming weeks, as part of my project for University.Roja123 (talk) 01:27, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evolutionary Aspects of Social Status 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Success is unbounded. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 26#Success is unbounded until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 21:39, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Success is unbounded" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Sita a muchos economistas pies de en enfoque sobre el origen tippos de posiciones y diferencias 2806:342:FDCC:17A8:688F:3ADB:F096:A725 (talk) 08:38, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Este artículo no es neutral
Talk:Physical phenomenon

message: I think these articles should be merged, they're the same concept Beast of traal T C 21:23, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I second that motion. The seem to be the same thing. Bobo the talking clown 18:31, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Schoolkids Oz

message: The article does not summarize the outcome.  Surely there was a result.  Hu 23:08, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outcome 
Talk:Residency (domicile)

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
Residency → Residency (domicile) or something else and
*Residency (disambiguation) → Residency
Although the meaning of establishing or maintaining domicile may be the most important use, the topic and the article are not particularly encyclopedic and are outweighed by the aggregate importance of other meanings of residency presented at Residency (disambiguation) (e.g., Residency (medicine), Residency (country subdivision)). —  AjaxSmack  14:21, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposals and provide opinions on a new article title. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support - I agree with this one all the way. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) 23:03, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. At the same time, residency (disambiguation) has been moved to residency. Please note that this has created a great many links to a disambiguation page that formerly pointed at an article. It would be good if as many of them as possible could be fixed to point to the appropriate meaning. --Stemonitis 17:51, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move request

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposals and provide opinions on a new article title. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support - I agree with this one all the way. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) 23:03, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. At the same time, residency (disambiguation) has been moved to residency. Please note that this has created a great many links to a disambiguation page that formerly pointed at an article. It would be good if as many of them as possible could be fixed to point to the appropriate meaning. --Stemonitis 17:51, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey and discussion
Talk:List of British fascist parties

message: I'm staying clear of the debate about the BNP as consensus will never be had but I've added the post-War groups that I feel are non-controversial (some hope). Effectively I have put in those who have directly referenced the fascist or Nazi past in order to make their appeals and, where appropriate, included cautionary notes. I've avoided non-political parties due to the title of the article as well. Keresaspa 13:39, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-war 

message: The reference and bibliography section at the bottom of the page needs to have page references to the stated information on the page, if no such references can be found then the information should be removed. added  U6j65 (talk) 15:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional page reference verification needed 

message: While lots of people don't think much of the UK Independence Party, they clearly are not actually fascist. This anon at 109.146.102.181 is looking vandal-like. Paul S (talk) 16:21, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: And now another anon with a different IP Address joins in... sock puppet? Paul S (talk) 18:22, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep. An IP starting with 86.148.244.217 has been undoing my removal of UKIP on a regular basis. Till there is a source, I'm going to keep undoing it. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:07, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who's This "UKIP are Fascist" anon?
Talk:Madison piercing

message: Why are madison piercings called madison piercings?
:Supposedly the piercing is named after the porn star Madison, whom was the first person to sport this piercing.  I've never seen any photographic data that backs that theory up, and it may be an urban legend.  I don't know anything about the individual Madison, but given that these piercings have a high rate of rejection, often leaving some really nasty scarring on the front of the neck, if she had one, it might be easy to tell from a decent photo of her neck.  Since the rise of the piercing industry in the 90's, new or experimental piercings tend to be named after the first individual bear them.  Glowimperial 06:34, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what "nasty scaring" means, and I have concerns about the general tone of the article, even after I edited it. The only study cited admits that it was "informal". It's hard to imagine that someone would not be aware that significant scaring was occurring on their neck, and very difficult to believe that such scaring couldn't largely be healed in a young person. Piano non troppo (talk) 08:17, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Rubidium oxide

message: I rewrote this article without adding much more content.  Hopefully it is better.  It would be helpful or interesting to have some reaction that Rb2O distinctively well vs RbOH.  The hydrogenation is one reaction.  Possibly Rb2O is used in glasses.  Its solid state structure merits mention.  --Smokefoot 23:21, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Unionville High School (Ontario)

message: Hello all, and thank you for contributing to this school site. I'm part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment team, and, I'm reviewing this page. I'm currently giving it a grade of Start on the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale and an importance of Low on this importance scale.
My reasoning is as follows: This article does not adaquately cite its sources and needs work on formal tone and WP:NPOV Adam McCormick 05:48, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment|Assessment]] as of March 2007 

message: Today I removed the following names from the notable alumni list:
*Amy Price-Francis, actress in "The Cleaner"
As far as I can tell, she is English. There should be a reference to confirm that she graduated from UHS.
Just a visitor comment: I attended UHS in the late 80s, and was friends with her brother. Amy Price-Francis certainly attended UHS.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.17.40.42 (talk) 16:08, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable alumni? 
Talk:The Pretty Toney Album

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 18:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''
Talk:Legend of the Liquid Sword (album)

message: whatever crackhead wrote this has no grasp of English.  Sentences like "The album was deemed amongst reviews a pleaser to most Wu-Tang Clan fans alike, yet many argue if it even compared to earlier or later releases" make no sense, and pretty much every line is like this.  The article is an embarrassment to wikipedia.  I can't be arsed to sort it out, but.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.200.161.180 (talk) 17:07, 28 July 2009 (UTC)