lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kentucky Senate

message: Is there a reason only half of the members are listed?--T. Anthony (talk) 09:19, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think User:CJS Hammer is in the process of adding them all. He just isn't done yet. Acdixon (talk • contribs • iki=wikipedia&lang=en  count) 16:19, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Thomas Howard (American football)

message: After the forensic investigation is completed, details of the crash should be added to the article.  From initial reports it is already evident that Thomas Howard caused the crash, having rear-ended a tractor-trailer rig while traveling over 100 miles per hour, far above the posted speed limit.  His car rolled several times and then vaulted over the center divider barrier, finally crashing head-on into an oncoming vehicle, killing its driver as well as himself and demolishing both cars.  The only remaining question is whether Howard was intoxicated, or had suffered a medical event.  Considering his young age, the former is more likely. — QuicksilverT @ 16:30, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death details 
Talk:Legislative Research Commission

message: added a couple links Legislative groupie (talk) 17:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Françoise David

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 10:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]]
Talk:Françoise Hardy

message: When listing her discography, shouldn't it be mentioned that all but five of her albums up to 1972 were officially untitled? The titles displayed are colloquial, not official. Holidayruin (talk) 16:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled/Self-Titled Albums

message: Here it says FH appeared in Masculin, féminin Francoise Hardy as "Woman with American officer"  RuthieK (talk) 19:08, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Masculin Feminin 

message: Radio Luxembourg isn't a British radio station, as the text claims. However, during the 1930s it started beaming English-language popular music to the UK during the evenings, funded by advertising and sponsorship.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.108.145.34 (talk) 07:34, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I was misled on that as Francoise called it a "British radio station" in the BBC interview. I've changed it to "English Language". Richerman (talk) 21:01, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radio Luxembourg 

message: I don't think "shy" is in any way the correct term for this woman who is a performer and actor. If she can do that but still prefers to read in bed she may be considered an introvert but she's certainly not shy. Ikuto.yagawa (talk) 22:12, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shyness vs. Introversion 

message: Why is novelist Patrick Modiano listed as after stating: "Hardy began to work with more renowned songwriters such as..."? Since when was he a 1960s/1970s "renowned" songwriter? He wrote the words for some songs, she sang one. Daisne (talk) 23:27, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patrick Modiano
Talk:Françoise Mouly

message: The majority of the material in this section was an unnecessary echo of material in the ToonBooks article. As the awards cited went to the entity "ToonBooks", that article is the proper venue for such detailed material. 
On the whole, the article, especially in this section, is overly PR-ized. Careful and conscientiously objective editing will improve all sections.
JTGILLICK (talk) 02:07, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reduction of ToonBooks material
Talk:Kentucky Transportation Cabinet

message: I ordered a new license a couple weeks and just looked at the receipt and my auto correct corrected my address instead of the address on my license and now it hasn’t came in the mail 2603:6010:5900:5291:9C68:6BC0:3A57:1F6F (talk) 23:22, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  My renewal license
Talk:Thomas Schlamme

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Shoe Money Productions. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 20#Shoe Money Productions until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:02, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Shoe Money Productions" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Frank Calder (politician)

message: It is mentioned that Frank A. Calder was the first aboriginal to be elected to a legislative assembly in Canada. I believe that this isn't the case since Ludger Bastien, Huron of the Wendake reservation, was elected to the Quebec legislative assembly in 1924 where he served until his defeat in 1927 .
Sorenhes 00:27, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First elected aboriginal? 
Talk:Frank Auerbach

message: Is there any attribution for the remark about Cezanne? It's not cited, and it isn't evident to me from his work, not that I'm an art critic, but I've probably seen as much Cezanne and certainly more Auerbach than the average museumgoer. - Jmabel | Talk 02:05, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cezanne? 

message: The character of the artist Max Ferber in Sebald's 'The Emigrants' is based in part on Frank Auerbach, according to this article in The Guardian, as well as in this blog
Is this something that could be added to the original article as a reference, or something of that sort? Eam531 (talk) 13:44, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional treament in W.G. Sebald's 'The Emigrants' 

message: Based on the discussion at FFD, there is a policy-based consensus that the two non-free images at Frank Auerbach should be reduced to one. As discussed in the close, I'm organizing an RFC on the matter. I've organized a single discussion section at the bottom to discuss these works. Otherwise, I'm pinging  -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:12, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC: which non-free images should be kept on this page? 

message: *If only one can be kept, I would choose Julia. It adds a bit of colour to the page. According to this article, she sits for him about three time a week, so the painting is representative, The other can be seen by anyone interested on the National Galleries of Scotland website (maybe an external link at the bottom?) Also, WP:ILIKEIT.—Anne Delong (talk) 11:17, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep [[:File:Auerbach, Head of Julia.jpg]]
Talk:W3C Markup Validation Service

message: Hi. I could not find an article about the W3C HTML Validator when searching and have since created my own (W3C's HTML Validator). I think it seems only sensible to merge these articles but I do not know how to add the tag on the article page. Any suggestions for merging (I can't delete articles - I'm not an administrator)? Should we merge the articles? --Jatkins 14:25, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the extremely long time over which this debate has run (since April 2007) and the lack of agreement to merge the articles, I will go ahead and remove the merger tags. The complete merger discussion is located on the talk page of the W3C article. I have also expanded this article, added some logos and a reference to it. Please feel free to help out and add more text and references! - Ahunt (talk) 19:33, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger with [[World Wide Web Consortium]]

message: It's been that way quite a while. Anyone have any information regarding this?Ldfifty (talk) 10:17, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I used it yesterday and just checked it a few seconds ago - it is working fine. - Ahunt (talk) 11:59, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  W3C Validation service down? 

message: Am I the only one to find that section useless? --Chealer (talk) 21:48, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, me too. In any case, it is original research, which should not be here. I will remove it. Drkirkby (talk) 15:37, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of markup validation for common websites 

message: Hello:
As a courtesy I wanted to take the discussion here if any editors have issues with my recent edits. The statement that W3C compliance has 100% zero effect on SEO is untrue and the sources given were not credible or stating anything that was supporting the statement. One reference I removed was a company selling their services, SEO optimizers. The other source was the Search Engine Journal, which is OK but they are not really journalists and are clearly selling services as well.
Code compliance is not a guarantee as far as SEO, but it can hurt a page's rank for a variety of reasons. I softened the statement and I think the whole assertion should be revisited. A. Ward (talk) 05:45, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction edits regarding SEO
Talk:Three Rivers, Texas

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 21:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POv tag 

message: I wrote maybe 75% of what once existed in this article, back when I was in high school and didn't completely understand citations.
Now that I'm about to graduate from college, I better understand citations, I understand why most of what I wrote needed to be deleted, because there was no proof what I wrote was true.
However, I still know that it was all 100% true, because I have lived there for 21 years.  There is no book on Three Rivers, no website, nothing I can possibly reference except for my own extensive, 100% true, and surprisingly unbiased (I kind of hate the town, but also am kind of proud of certain aspects of it) knowledge.  Is there any way I could possibly cite myself as a well-informed resident?  It's not like I was even stating arguable facts like "Three Rivers is 970 years old", it was things anyone could observe about the town itself by visiting it.  
Basically I'm asking those who know more than me if there's anything I can do to have my hard work replaced in the article, but I want to do it properly this time.
Thanks, Brady (talk) 03:53, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation Question
Talk:Hakim Bouchouari

message: Runcorn 14:26, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Template talk:Texas A&M University System

message: I know it's currently part of TAMU-Kingsville, but the San Antonio campus will become its own University at some point in the future. Should we note that in this A&M System box? How about an article on Texas A&M University–San Antonio? I'm not knowledgeable enough on the plans or timetable to write an article myself, but perhaps someone more familiar with it could write one. (I noted the plans in the TAMU-Kingsville article already.) — Bellhalla 14:38, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I do agree that the San Antonio campus will need its own article in the future however currently the facilities leased in San Antonio are temporary. A&M is currently searching for a location in south San Antonio for the construction of a permanent campus at which point the land leased at the current time will be relinquished. Your edit in the TAMU-Kingsville article for the moment is the most appropriate until the Board of Regents formally decides on a campus location at which point I will assist in the creation of an article for the new campus. -- Hut101 17:18, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A&M–San Antonio
Talk:Tika Sumpter

message: I have contacted the Fan club for permission to use a photo. I will be updating the personal content as well. This will be my first major edit. Please let me know if you have any objections before I begin and keep me updated on any changes. --Shaymer (talk) 15:57, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info & photo 

message: Hey girl I love U in the Haves and have not is one of my fav show ever I can't wait to June 21 I c ur bdy is one day before the show come back on ur bday June 20 show cone bk on June 21 love U Tika write back  Mswatts2016 (talk) 20:56, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  hey chic
Talk:Tim Bogar

message: Bogar is often seen as a potential managerial candidate and has been under consideration for previous managerial jobs. Due to his extensive minor-league managerial experience, he is seen as a more desirable candidate than current managers Robin Ventura of the Chicago White Sox and Mike Matheny of the St. Louis Cardinals, who were given their managerial positions without any experience at all.
*1) I have never heard this
*2) it's arguably biased showing a point of view in favor of mr. bogar. 
I am suggesting it be removed entirely until sourcing is found...thoughts, comments, concerns?
--Boston Burkenation (talk) 15:30, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced statements
Talk:Felix Grundy

message: I'm new to contributing to Wikipedia and would very much appreciate your help.  I have tried to post a new biography that published this week on the historical figure, Felix Grundy.  I've tried to post this biography as a reference on the page for Felix Grundy but it keeps getting deleted.  Can you tell me why or if I am doing something wrong with posting?  I can be reached at <redacted>.  Below is the post I was trying to make and here is the Wikipedia page on Felix Grundy - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felix_Grundy  Many thanks, Betsy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Betsy Cragon (talk • contribs) — Betsy Cragon (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. 
HERE IS THE LANGUAGE:
Heller III, J. Roderick. Democracy's Lawyer: Felix Grundy of the Old Southwest. LSU Press. Published in 2010. 
AND HERE IS THE ACTUAL CODE I'VE USED TO POST IT:
*
:This new account is an obvious sockpuppet of User:Democracy's Lawyer, an s.p.a. only used to advertise this same book; and has been blocked as such. That does not necessarily mean that the book is irrelevant to the article; but neither the spammer nor their sockpuppet account has ever attempted to make any case for adding it to the article, being content to add spamlinks to it. --Orange Mike  |  Talk 16:20, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked the link to the book - it is indeed perfectly on-topic for the Felix Grundy article and is published by a university press. It's unfortunate that some prior user added it as a reference to some less relevant articles, but I can't see any reason to remove it as a reference in the Felix Grundy article, still less to conclude this a sockpuppet rather than a good-faith edit. By all means blacklist spammers, but it would be a dangerous policy to blacklist references to books, particularly academic books - it would be too easy for someone who wanted to suppress a book to covertly spam references to it in order to get it blacklisted (not that that is likely to have happened in this case). 
This seems to belong on Talk:Felix Grundy, so I have copied it there. I have no prior interest in this topic or association with any of its editors. Enon (talk) 23:57, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC comments - Copied
Talk:Tim Floyd

message: this article needs a table for this. –Howard the Duck 02:36, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I added it. –Howard the Duck 18:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NBA coaching record
Talk:Frank Brooks (baseball)

message: Like the subject line... That ain't frank brooks. This man looks like an accountant. Frank Brooks never heard of that vocation 2600:1001:B01E:3ABA:84FA:1897:62FF:AB4D (talk) 19:11, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Stop using big words. Frank no know them 2601:8C:4781:8C80:4897:DB62:A1AC:3AB2 (talk) 03:29, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  That isn't frank brooks
Talk:United States Penitentiary, McCreary

message: Will there be any inmates from mccary county penitentiary be released soon by the first step act Mandaboo (talk) 13:59, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free jack banks 
Talk:Frank Cady

message: At the beginning of the Wikipedia article, it says that he died in 2012, but in the paragraph labeled “death,“ it says he died in 2008. One of these two references must be mistaken. 2601:194:8280:7170:B046:F4F2:2D65:7737 (talk) 13:41, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: As I read the "Death" section, Cady's wife died in 2008. He died in 2012, which matches the date in the lead. Eddie Blick (talk) 21:45, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death
Talk:Frank Caprio

message: I just removed a few lines that were copied directly from their copyrighted sources. This is not to say that the general content should necessarily not be included in some reasonably rephrased manner, I'm just not the person who will deal with that at the moment. --Nat Gertler (talk) 22:39, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violations
Talk:Frank Chamberlin

message: Reports say he died on November 17, 2013.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.34.211 (talk) 21:46, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Death 

message: How could his career have started in 2000 if he wasn't drafted until 2002?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.164.181.54 (talk) 22:35, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Draft
Talk:Frank Chin

message: I'm not sure how we should handle his long-running "war" with Maxine Hong Kingston, but I'm sure that the present approach (complete omission) is wrong. See, for some basic discussion of this, Sara Solovitch, Finding a Voice, San Jose Mercury News, June 30, 1991. He was brutal in writing about her early work; her third novel Tripmaster Monkey is generally considered a response in the form of a roman a clef about him (see in particular Solovitch's remarks on page 2 of the same article). I've read the book, and the resemblance seems to me, also, to be beyond question.
Any suggestions? - Jmabel | Talk 03:04, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute with Maxine Hong Kingston 

message: There is a 1970 interview with Chin, with many elements of biography, p. 305–311 in Judy Yung, Gordon H. Chang, and Him Mark Lai (compilers and editors), Chinese American Voices, University of California Press (2006). . I recommend it to whoever is working on this article. - Jmabel | Talk 03:08, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A useful source 

message: If his Chinese surname is 趙 (Mandarin Zhào), why is his English surname Chin, rather than Zhao or Chao? According to Zhao (surname), one variant (apparently Cantonese) is Chiu; could it be somewhere in his family history Chiu got misspelled or misread as Chin? Angr (talk) 17:28, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surname 

message: I added a photo to the article. 
This :File:FRANK&GUITAR1975.jpg is another option.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 19:28, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Talk:Tish Hinojosa

message: The text of this article was copied and pasted from www.mundotish.com/bio.doc .  Someone should rewrite it in his or her own words.  Emoll 16:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now removed. Those who wish to work from it to guide rewriting can either access the history of the main article page OR go to the site from which it was copied. We can find citations for items about music others have covered, etc. Lawikitejana 14:39, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied and pasted from Hinojosa's website
Talk:Frank Crean

message: The headline in The Australian on the report of Frank Crean's death, "Former minister Frank Crean dies" was wrong. It should have been "Former Deputy Prime Minister Frank Crean dies".
The Deputy Prime Minister of this country should be given the same kind of respect and courtesy that the Americans give to their Vice Presidents. A Deputy Prime Minister should not be treated as simply just another minister. --The Shadow Treasurer (talk) 1:36, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The only problem is that the Australian, in their wisdom, used the form of words "Former minister Frank Crean dies" for their headline.  We might prefer it if they'd written what you say, but they didn't.  We quote book and article titles with the exact wording chosen by their authors, and we don't even correct spelling mistakes or typographical errors, let alone add new words.  I don't believe we have any authority to suggest the title of an article is X if it's in fact Y.  One solution would be to find another article that has the preferred headline.  --  JackofOz (talk) 21:18, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

text: Sub-editors generally try and keep headline length to a minimum and that would be the likely reason behind the wording. He was also Treasurer at one stage and I would suggest a case could be made that Treasurer is seen as the more prestigious position in the Australian government. Certainly Peter Costello was seen as more powerful than John Anderson (Australian politician) and Paul Keating much more so than Lionel Bowen. The current situation with a powerful Deputy PM in Gillard seems to me to actually quite unusual. -- Mattinbgn\talk 04:35, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

text: Look, nobody here's disagreeing with you, The Shadow Treasurer. The issue in question is not whether we should refer to him in the article as minister, Treasurer, DPM or anything else.  Your beef is with The Australian for choosing to refer to him as "former minister" rather than "former Deputy Prime Minister", and I suggest you take it up with them if you feel that strongly about it.  I should warn you that they would probably say that he was indeed a minister, so the headline is not inaccurate.  Let's not spend any more time on this issue, as it's not relevant to the Wikipedia article on Frank Crean--  JackofOz (talk) 05:49, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Australian headline incorrect 

message: I'm wondering if this is a little strong, and possibly misleading.  It suggests e.g. a formal name change via deed poll.  I'm not aware that there was anything formal about his switch from Francis Daniel to Frank.  My understanding is that he simply started using the name Frank Crean, and that's how his name always appeared thereafter.  Does anyone know of anything more formal than that?  --  JackofOz (talk) 21:31, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Changed his name"