lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Seasoning

message: Spice trade has been nominated to be improved by Wikipedia:This week's improvement drive. Come and support the article with your vote!--Fenice 06:08, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvement drive

message: Seasonings include herbs and spices, which are themselves frequently referred to as "seasonings". 
Huh?
203.116.12.114 (talk) 10:18, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Herbs and spices

message: See talk at Talk:Aging (food)#Aging (food) and Seasoning. --Mezze stagioni (talk) 19:17, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aging (food) and Seasoning 

message: Tyme ? 2600:1009:B11D:35A8:45BD:B377:D07B:94FB (talk) 18:28, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is Tyme used in ?
Talk:Mount Nelson, Tasmania

message: To the contributors of this article - great work!  I usually manage to meddle in most Tasmanian based articles but this one has sprung up without me noticing! -- Chuq 07:13, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

message: location of signal Station Brasserie on Google earth
55 G 528087.4m E 5247543 m S elev 340 m
The following coordinate fixes are needed for
Madiha Faragr-Miller
—64.28.140.228 (talk) 15:38, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the article didn't contain coordinates specifically for the signal station, so they can't have been erroneous. I've now added them, though. Is that what you wanted? (If you're referring to the cafe at the signal station, I don't think that merits its own set of coordinates.) Deor (talk) 19:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: Is this article about the suburb or the mountain. I came here to find the elevation of the hill (it's not there), but if it is supposed to be about the mountain then I would say the quality of the article is not remarkable. If it's about the suburb then we could do with either an article about the mountain (obviously not the best option), or include geographical information in here.
BTW it's 352m. Somebody please add in whichever way you deem fits. Tilgrieog (talk) 14:50, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The mountain?
Talk:Glenorchy, New Zealand

message: These two lines were removed from under the entry for the NZ town on the Glenorchy disambig page.  They are more suitable for this article - however, someone more knowledgable about the town may want to integrate them.
**population 200
**Routeburn Track
-- Chuq 07:18, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The quality of this article has needed upgrading. I have done many changes. Any help appreciated!
--Grapeman4 (talk) 09:56, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality
Talk:List of sultans of Brunei

message: The article on Brunei is currently listed to be improved on Wikipedia: This week's improvement drive. You can support the nomination with your vote there. --Fenice 06:36, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --naz 14:44, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvement Drive

message: Is there a good reason why this section is a template? I've never seen the body of an article done this way. I'd think it should be merely text like the rest of the article (besides the footer). It's only 1 paragraph, too.--SidP (talk) 12:54, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncertainties section as template? 

message: Please 1.4.243.11 (talk) 14:48, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assalamualaikum my name is Muhammad Ali
Talk:Godalming Hundred

message: This block quote is far too long for a tertiary source such as an encyclopedia. Needs to be trimmed somehow to a succinct summary. MRSC • Talk 18:13, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have amended it, paraphrasing the original.Aetheling1125 01:44, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Domesday

message: This article is currently titled Godalming (hundred).  Putting the "hundred" in brackets suggests that the thing is normally called just "Godalming", but that it needs the "hundred" to be distinguished from "Godalming (town)", "Godalming (surname)" or whatever.  Is Godalming Hundred not called that, as a two-word term – and I'd have thought with the "hundred" capitalised?  Surely it's the name of a hundred, not a type of "Godalming".  Richard New Forest (talk) 21:12, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:Iran Khodro Diesel

message: The article reads as if it's been lifted from company marketing materials.--GagHalfrunt (talk) 23:57, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marketing puff 
Talk:Cloudsplitter

message: Is the link to wiktionary on "hermitage" really necessary-- it's just a word. We shouldn't go linking all the hard words on Wikipedia, should we?
: IMHO of all the words that are on the page - hermitage is probably the most deserving of a wiki link. It's not unreasonable for someone to read the page and think what the heck is a hermitage? The link to that word is justified. However there are plenty of randomly wiki-linked words in the article. Please proceed with de-wikifying as you see fit. Megapixie 08:29, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

message: This article has an incorrect link to Owen Brown, father of John Brown and grandfather of the Owen Brown who is the main character of the novel.
There is no biographical info presently in Wikipedia on Owen Brown, son of John Brown.
K.D. Duck
kidoduckKidoduck (talk) 16:21, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  incorrect link to Owen Brown
Talk:Government of India Act 1935

message: I wrote a stub to replace the copyrighted text-- it's not much.
:It is an important legislation, and depending on my time, I shall surely contribute. --Bhadani 16:14, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This act needs some pretty serious NPOV work.  The idea that the Constitution was bad because of its length is particularly dubious.  More cites needed for the particularly odd claims.  Also it would be better to compare it against the other Dominion constitutions, which also lacked things like Bills of Rights.
Morwen - Talk 19:34, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: I don't think the article is really that bad, but it is a bit unbalanced. I'd suggest:
*Less detail on the actual legal contents, more on the intentions
*more on the political background to the writing of it
*far less emphasis on Linlithgow (though I think the assessment of his role is accurate) - more on Zetland, on why he couldn't get Cabinet to concentrate on India, and the role of Congress in deliberately trying to sink the Act (and Congress' view of itself - it saw itself not as a poltical party among other parties, but as the one and only legitimate voice of the Indian people - not very conducive to launching a democratic reform)
PiCo 17:50, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to improve this article 

message: According to other articles, this act was used as the Constitution of the dominions of India and Pakistan in the years immediately after independence.  How did that work, exactly?  I'm assuming that it needed extensive amendment in both cases?  It would be useful to discuss here, but the narrative stops abruptly in 1939. --Jfruh (talk) 03:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Rab Butler certainly made that or a similar claim, that it helped to set India on the path of being a western-style Parliamentary democracy, and said in his memoirs that Nehru had admitted as much to him privately when he visited India in 1954. He also said that Nehru later mellowed a bit from his blood-curdling rhetoric of the 1930s. I read elsewhere that Nehru and even Gandhi himself had to keep up the anti-British rhetoric to placate the extremists in their own ranks.Paulturtle (talk) 10:47, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Act as the first constitution of India and Pakistan 

message: Sir Robert Horne was, according to what appears to be a quote from some identified source, terrified during the debates in 1935 at the prospect of a viceroy appointed by a Labour government. But, um, in 1935 the then-current viceroy, Lord Willingdon, had been appointed by MacDonald's Labour government in the spring of 1931. So, um, I'm confused. john k (talk) 23:45, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Labour seem to have been committed to dominion status for India by the mid 1930s. Maybe that was the reason.Paulturtle (talk) 03:18, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  die-hard Tories
Talk:Jacob Epstein (disambiguation)

message: I suspect the change to being a disambiguation page was a mistake. We don't have an article on Jacob Epstein (spy) and I can't find any references to him — is it possible someone has got confused with Joseph Epstein (French Resistance leader)?
In any case, the sculptor must be far more famous. I would suggest this is a primary topic Disambiguation. -- Solipsist 07:51, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well we now have a article on the spy, but it still looks like he is of dramatically less significance. Even a google search for "Jacob Epstein World War" only brings up references to the sculptor and other unrelated Epsteins with no mention of the spy. So moving back to primary topic disambiguation which will also repair 95% of the internal links. -- Solipsist 06:42, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: disambiguation
Talk:Meera

message: Can anyone verify the birth and death years for Mirabai?
The article has a section about the Mughal Emperor Akbar, and how he desired to see her. However, the article says that Mirabai died in 1547, which is 9 years before Akbar became emperor, and he would have been only 5 years old at that time.
If she died in 1547, she would have been only 49, is it possible she lived longer? Into the reign of Akbar?69.227.22.122 (talk) 00:24, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mirabai's year of death
Talk:Seiko Matsuda

message: The "It is definitely a tribute to Seiko's amazing music career" seems to me to be a bit too self-congratulatory and should be rephrased to meet encyclopaedic standards. And the boxed set release date bit needs to be revised as well - although I just randomly happened upon this page, and I don't know anything about Seiko Matsuda.Dagari 13:31, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really, seeing she's done dozens of covers of English songs, including songs by Vanessa Williams, EXPOSE, among others. Groink 06:23, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: the boxed set bit

message: Seiko used to hold the record for the most number 1 singles by a female singer (25 in all) until March 2006 when Ayumi Hamasaki's "Startin' / Born To Be..." reached number 1, making it her 26th single to top the charts. Nevertheless Seiko still holds the record of the most consecutive No.1 singles for a female artist, a record that she has been holding for two decades and not likely to be broken anytime soon (Ayumi has 16 consecutive number 1 singles as of July 2007). Is that the Japanese record, or the world record? Nik42 17:58, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: From the context and the numbers, I believe that is the world record. Lady Galaxy 03:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Record
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/UninvitedCompany

message: The subject of this RFC is UninvitedCompany.
The RFC is on the subject of the appropriateness of his use of blocking, particularly given his explicitely stated extreme bias.
There is a lot of off topic discussion.
~~~~ ( ! | ? | * ) 14:32, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Staying on Topic 

message: Would it be possible for a developer to check to see if Ril posts from an address in Iowa?  Without revealing his address.  Zoe 23:50, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
* You're not suggesting that Ril is our friend of olden time, the inimitable Adam Rinkleff, Mr. Anarchosocial-communism himself, AKA User:Lir, User:Pizza Puzzle, user:Ril, user:Dietary Fiber, [[user:I've probably forgotten a dozen more, are you?  It couldn't be.  The Uninvited Co., Inc. 00:47, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for evesdropping, and far be it for me to stick up for -Ril-, but I've little doubt that he's from the UK. His British perspective (although perhaps not manners) is consistent. Of many things he may be guilty, but not the dreadful crime of being from Iowa. --Doc (?) 00:57, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Iowa is that bad? ~~~~ ( ! | ? | * ) 01:08, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

text: Well, I read a book by Bill Bryson, and I certainly didn't fancy it :{ --Doc (?) 01:12, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: IP address?
Talk:Freya Crescent

message: I'm tempted to think that this seeming contradiction is more of a show of prejudice against the nezumi. Looking at the race themselves, neither mouse nor rat really fits very well, in any event.
Wilson 6500 20:03, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps, but it suggests to me that the person who wrote the "official" descriptions on the page did not work on the game itself. It also says that Eiko was raised by summoners after her parents died, neglecting that her family belonged to a village of summoners, and they too were summoners; and that she was raised by her grandfather, not by generic summoners. -- VederJuda 00:08, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rats / Mice 

message: I thought I'd take this paragraph by Wilson 6500 out of the main article and put it here, since it's not very encyclopaedic:
Official information on Freya is, at best, hard to find. As you (will) see above, she recieves little time in-game, and there are few resources officially discussing her outside of the game--somewhat common for a video game character. See Square-Enix's North American Final Fantasy IX page for official info—it is unfortunately a flash document, so readers will need to manually find the characters page (check the right-hand side of the flash, or use the "Menu" option on the bottom right) and the Freya Crescent page (click her silhouette). Unfortunately, although this source can be considered authoritative (the game was created by Square-Enix), much of the information therein is never directly referenced in the game, and some of it seems to contradict the game. For instance, there is no direct mention in the game of her supposed banishment, nor of her being "raised" as a Dragon Knight. It also refers to a "Mouse Clan," even though Burmecians are regarded as rats in the game, not even being called a "Rat Clan."
--Marcg106 04:35, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  references 

message: It seems like this entry gives too much story with lots of specifics that really are not needed to give a comprehensive view of the character.  Does anyone else feel it should be shortened? ZPS102 00:44, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  too much info? 

message: "Her ability "Reis' Wind" is a reference to a character in Final Fantasy Tactics." Er... what? Didn't FFT come about about four years after FFIX? 88.104.22.5 20:02, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Final Fantasy Tactics was released in 1997. Final Fantasy IX was released in 2000. You might be thinking about the vastly inferior Final Fantasy Tactics Advance. Voretus 20:09, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anachronisms 

message: Does anyone think it would be worth mentioning her similarities with the FFIV character? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dlae (talk • contribs) 12:13, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there are that many. Voretus 17:23, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kain Highwind
Talk:Knight Lore

message: czar 06:58, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family Computer Magazine preview 

message: *Jeux & Stratégie #32
*Jeux & Stratégie HS #3
207.229.139.154 (talk) 02:31, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Is there anything from these reviews that warrants inclusion that isn't already covered in the article? czar 04:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  French reviews
Talk:Custer National Forest

message: I think the date of creation in the infobox must be wrong, because Otter National Forest was founded on March 2, 1907. --Sinuhe20 (talk) 07:41, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of creation in Infobox 
Talk:Swan River Colony

message: Should this page have Perth's history eg from 1840s to 1970s on? Maybe the title of Swan River Colony should change to History of Perth to be consistent with the other capital cities, or perhaps a new article called History of Perth. The reason is I'm not sure where to add historical events from Perth in the early 1900s. For example a sentence about the first airport or the 1962 Commonwealth/Empire Games in the Swan River Colony doesn't quite sound right. A lot of Perth's history is missing from Wikipedia. Any thoughts? Gazjo 12:49, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History of Perth

message: Current reading of this article (and recent edits) suggest an attitude of disfavour about swan river area - my memory (and i cannot place the ref easily) is that is not a NPOV line of argument and that such a conclusion is a shallow reading of sources - anyone? (Also posted at wa project noticeboard) SatuSuro 01:48, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is fairly accurate. The consensus seems to be that early visitors to the area didn't seem to think much of it. The only explorer to show any enthusiasm was Stirling, and that appears to have been due to a combination of him having stuck almost exclusively to the narrow belt of good soil along the Swan, and his own ulterior motives for exaggerating the area's suitability. Hesperian 01:58, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Early visitors and attitude
Talk:Myrciaria dubia

message: Deleted a bunch of unverifiable information on uses of camu camu that had invalid references or no references. 174.21.119.58 (talk) 22:43, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Very poor link - took me several tries to get the correct page on the Dr. Duke's Phytochemical and Ethnobotanical Databases site.  I have corrected the link.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:28, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Uses Section

message: Reworded the wild and unfounded claim that Camu Camu can be used to fight depression. After digging through dozens and dozens of new-age websites, all rehashing the same baseless claim, I found a great citation in Dr. James A. Duke's book "Duke's Handbook of Medicinal Plants of Latin America" in which he lists the "theoretical" benefits of Cama Cama. Yes, that's right. The original source of all this nonsense regards this information as "theoretical". Wikipedia is meant to be a source of facts, not claims. If you herbalists want to spread your disinformation and rubbish, that's fine, but please at least read up on what is and is not a citation -- some random 300 word article on herbnet.org with no citations of its own does is NOT a reliable source.  JasonAdama (talk) 20:08, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cama Cama and Depression -- nice try, guys
Talk:Servite Order

message: Would it be appropriate to mention Servite high school of Anaheim on this page, which is run by the Servites? --Peter Kirby 08:52, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The Cath ency is public domain. History2007 (talk) 10:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: There is no diocese of Belville, NC, nor is there a diocese of Blue Island, IL, nor has there ever been such a diocese. Since this section of the article doesn't have sources, I don't know where to go to find out what is meant.
JediKnyghte (talk) 05:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Affiliated Institutions 

message: Tightened up the lead, turned it into a single paragraph, made S1 into an English sentence, it was a phrase. Not sure we need the last bit about the friars being a community but I left it.Shajure (talk) 19:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead - [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section]] 

message: Removed elliptical wording/pedantry/overly-exuberant-wording from 1st couple of paragraphs and tightened it up a great deal.  The entire article needs tightening.Shajure (talk) 19:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Category talk:Firearm stubs

message: I just put a prop up on Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals to make firearms a subcat of . Please put any comments there.
Megapixie 08:57, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Make firearms-stub a subcat of weapon-stub?

message: It seems a bit crazy to have all these subcats for firearms-stubs. It makes stub sorting more difficult, and doesn't seem to serve any purpose. Esp since some of these cats will have less than the 60 articles defined by Wikipedia:Stubs. Just my 2 cents. Megapixie 01:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Are all the different stub categories really needed?
Talk:Mark V Special Operations Craft

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:08, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Vortisaur

message: This article is no longer than the others on the list, IMO it should be merged anyone against this?
:The reason this remained separate, I believe, is because unlike the others, the Vortisaurs appear in more than one story. That being said, I don't have any strong objections to merging it if others feel the same. --khaosworks (talk• contribs) 10:14, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
::I didn't merge this one into the list of monsters at the time of its creation as it is not a television series monster so was unsure of whether to include. As you say, they do appear in more than one adventure so I am likewise not bothered one way or the other. Tim! (talk) 16:46, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not too bothered either, it was just that the article seemed rather short to be on its own. Perhaps we should write a set of rules as to what should and shouldn't have its own article on the WikiProject page. --βjweþþ (talk) 19:10, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no one seems concerned, shall I remove the merge notice?--Sean Jelly Baby? 22:02, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ow that has sat there for two months :| Tim! (talk) 22:04, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Bighorn Mountains

message: I moved the page...the mountains themselves are referred to as the Big Horns (two words). Associated rivers, the national forest, etc. utilize the combined form of Bighorn. It's not that big a deal, but there is this as a disambiguation .--MONGO 09:35, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
:'Big horn mountain' is used in about 2,000 articles and 'bighorn mountain' is used in about 2,300. 'Big Horn Mountain range' is used in about 80 and 'Bighorn Mountain range' is used in about 50 articles. This article from wyo.gov uses both spellings. The link http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/bighorn/about/facts/ from February 25, 2005 wayback machine stated, "The Forest and river are referred to as "Bighorn" (single word), while the mountain range itself is referred to as the "Big Horns"." http://www.fs.usda.gov/main/bighorn/about-forest now omits the Bighorn" / "Big Horns" sentence. The 1962 Official Board Decision on "Bighorn" is mentioned here. I'm fine with what ever you decide regarding Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names). -- Jreferee (talk) 13:56, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved to Bighorn Mountains per USGS topos and GNIS - and the existing usage in the page. Vsmith (talk) 14:40, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi I added some photos 2 this page over 2 years ago, just curious why they were deleted.JohnDavidStutts (talk) 06:46, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No idea why they were removed, I've reinstated them. --Mike Cline (talk) 13:55, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: Back in 2012, a large piece was added about Cloud Peak Wilderness area and "unprotected National Forest" land (mentioned 3 times).  I agree Cloud Peak has special protections, but National Forest lands are far from unprotected (logging is essentially prohibited, as are new roads, etc.).  I put in a citation needed, I'm wondering if that word really applies or if it should be clarified in some way. Nerfer (talk) 17:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unprotected National Forest 