lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:King Arthur and King Cornwall

message: It's clear that this ballad was written in the Percy Folio, which is from the 17th century.  However, it's unclear when the ballad itself originated.  Is there any further information on that?  Also, is it known whether it was ever written down prior to the Percy Folio, or was that the first time? -Bbik 23:08, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It survives only in the Percy Folio (the parts that survive, that is). The language suggests it was written around the time of the Percy Folio manuscript in the 17th century, or at least not much earlier. It is unknown whether the ballad is based on an older story, but much of the material in the manuscript is.--Cúchullain t/c 01:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date confusion

message: The Green Knight used an axe from Denmark. Is this a Danish axe, or just an axe from Denmark? --Soetermans 09:01, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. It consistently says "Danish axe", along with the "Collen brand" (sword from Cologne) and the "Millaine" (Milanese) knife. It could be referring to the Danish axe.--Cúchullain t/c 09:57, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was thinking the same thing as Soetermans. Unfortunately, I'm not sure how long the Danish axe has been known by that name. Good work on the article. Valentinian T / C 10:34, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Axe from Denmark
Talk:BBC History of World War II

message: Is this really one of the discs in the set? I don't see it listed on Amazon. Instead I see "D-Day: Reflections of Courage". --Traal (talk) 09:57, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  D-Day 6.6.1944
Talk:Kingston Rule

message: It is not obvious to me how Rose Of Kingston is related to Kingston Town.  Perhaps a breeding expert could add some details about this. 203.214.135.236 (talk) 08:47, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question! Rose Of Kingston is from family 24 and Kingston Town is from family 12b so there is no connection there. Kingston Park are the breeders of Kingston Town, Rose of Kingston, Spirit of Kingston, Kingston Rule etc and this seems to be the only link.Cgoodwin (talk) 20:16, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Breeding Query
Talk:Botswana national football team

message: I made some informative edits to this page a while ago which have been inexplicably deleted. The page now makes no mention of Botswana's success in reaching their only major tournament. This is a shambles. -Sh4wz0r (talk) 20:47, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Poor State of this Article

message: The Home Kits Look Just Exatly As The Argentina national football team's Home Kit.Im Pretty Confuesed Of The Colors Basiclly.Thank You.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cokepepsi (talk • contribs) 06:15, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home Kits 

message: At WikiProject Football, I ask for discussion if it is okay to add a "Former players" section to this article. Here is an example
Former players:
*Khumoetsile Kufigwa (2014)
*Godairone Modingwane (2018–)
*Phuthego Modipe (2001)
*Kagiso Gofaone Molapi (2011)
*Oneeleng Radikara (1999)
Please let me know thoughts and opinions. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 19:15, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Better use the category :Category:Botswana men's international footballers. A list should include a good inclusion criteria. -Koppapa (talk) 11:05, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal - Former players section 
Talk:Pro TV

message: Again, just like other articles from the same media trust, this does not quote data, it sounds like a commercial and so on.
Tried to clean it up. Removed weasel words and so on. Sigh, I know that all my work will be deleted when some random dude will come over and revert all my changes. there are stilldiffrent figures that aren't verified. Bravemuta 21:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

message: It says:"== La Bloc == The most successful week-day sitcom in Romania." I'm removing it until someone can provide the source. Bravemuta 20:49, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  La Bloc 

message: va rog frumos sa schimbați anul lansării 213.233.104.33 (talk) 14:48, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  protv înființată 1decebrie 1993
Talk:Nanoviridae

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://ictv.global/taxonomy/etymology?page=2 and https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9880029/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  DanCherek (talk) 16:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Siphoviridae

message: In the article here, the list is given as 
: L5likevirus, Lambdalikevirus, Phic3unalikevirus, and Psimunalikevirus and the proposed genera Sfi2likevirus, Sfi1likevirus, Sk1likevirus, and Tm4likevirus.
In the refereced scientific article Brüssow et al., the list is given as 
:λ‐, ψM2‐, L5‐, Sfi21‐, Sfi11‐, φC31‐, sk1‐ and TM4‐like phages. 
My suggestions:
* L5likevirus is now named L5virus, former name is L5-like phage
* Lambdalikevirus is now named Lambdavirus, former name is λ‐like phage
* Phic3unalikevirus is now named Phic31virus, former name is φC31‐like phage
* Tm4likevirus is now named Tm4virus, former (species) name is TM4‐like phage
* Sk1likevirus (named Skunalikevirus in §Taxonomy) is now named Sk1virus, former (species) name is Sk1‐like phage
* Sfi2likevirus should be read as Sfi21dt1virus, formerly sfi21likevirus and Sfi21‐like phage (species?)
* Sfi1likevirus should be read as Sfi11virus, formerly Sfi11likevirus and Sfi11‐like phage (species?)
* Psimunalikevirus (current name Psimunavirus with species Methanobacterium virus psiM1) might refer to ψM2‐like phage (aka Methanobacterium phage psiM2) instead. This (M2) is not listed in ICTV Master Species List 2018a v1. So what?
Except the questionable ψM2‐like phage all genera are no longer just proposed but ITCV acknowledged now (see ICTV master species list). However, something like a Psimduovirus does not exist. Please, could an expert clarify?
Kind regards --Ernsts (talk) 20:12, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm no expert – try at WT:WikiProject Viruses if you think you need one – but it has been agreed to use ICTV 2018, so I would unhesitatingly update the list to its species. Peter coxhead (talk) 07:23, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed lambda supergroup 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :77likevirus. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 18#77likevirus until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:36, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "77likevirus" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Mummify

message: I feel that this;
http://www.barnesphotography.com.au/histcaulcup/mummify.jpg 
Is an appropriate picture for this page - could somebody either put it on the page themselves, or link me to someway I can learn to do it? Or both?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akebai (talk • contribs) 03:24, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You cannot just use any image you find on the internet. This is a picture by Jenny Barnes who is a profesional Equine Photographer. It is not free and is probably subject to Copyright restrictions.  Please read the Wikipedia policy on Copyrights WP:COPY. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 04:56, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Filamentous bacteriophage

message: Because the previous information was both too technical and unverifiable, I decided to completely remove and replace the article. Please discuss if you have any kind of issue.
*Unverifiable because there were no references
*Unverifiable because the only links were to other wiki sites
*Unverifiable because the user who originally added the information  has been indefinitely blocked and cannot be reached
Again, if you have any objection to my edit, please discuss Bervin61 (talk) 18:07, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Replaced Article
Talk:Octagonal (horse)

message: There are other useful uses of the word 'octagonal'?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ProfDEH (talk • contribs) 19:31, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support per nom. Clear primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:14, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Towers Department Stores

message: * 1205 Cyrville Road (now a Target)
...... etc. The rest is remarked out.
 
645 Dundas St.
 Woodstock, Ontario 
SlightSmile 03:02, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temporarely transfer remarked out content here
Talk:Ithaca College Television

message: I've suggested that the Newswatch 16 article be merged here, if not deleted, because of its short length (what Wikipedia calls text). Such a change may also have the advantage of allowing more depth on other television shows.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.247.148.158 (talk) 11:02, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I redirected it. If anyone wants to merge the info, feel free. Enigmamsg 03:17, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Joselito Pepito "Peter" Cayetano

message: This article seems to be a typical "one event" subject. An unknown individual has a similar name to another more famous candidate and poses as a candidate just to create confusion and he is suspended by election authorities.  We are also left at a suspense of him disappearing. But what happened later. Did he resurface again after search was conducted? If no further relevant information can be provided, this article is a great candidate for deletion. werldwayd (talk) 21:20, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: One event article
Talk:John William Kitson

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
There are some serious notability questions. Also, family oral history are not suitable references, unless they have been published elsewhere.
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 03:23, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:The White Stripes discography

message: Could someone list the amount of sales for each album? And the certification (i.e. Platinum, Gold, etc.)? Gary King (talk) 16:35, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many sales for each album? 

message: Per WP:DISCOG, 10 columns.  Both singles and albums tables have too many.  Any preferences on which should be removed?  Anyone? - eo (talk) 13:47, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Okaaaay three months later, no discussion, I will begin working on reducing this on a subpage and implement here when completed.  I'll base countries-inclusion on chart action and music market size.  Thanks - eo (talk) 16:20, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Trimming of tables needed

message: What about The Legendary Lost Tapes? Searching for it in Google it seems to be released in 2004. --Phyrexian ɸ 16:32, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing albums 
Talk:Schwarz Stein

message: The solo work of the members of Schwarz Stein seems inappropriate here and a violation of WP:COAT.  -Xcuref1endx (talk) 02:17, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Solo work
Talk:Polydnaviriformidae

message: Is this article's name correct? As a word it's unpronouncable. --jazzle 11:37, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added IPA pronunciation guide. Bazza (talk) 13:22, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Poly-DNA Virus' surely? 

message: I happened to notice in this article that the editors were prudent enough to specify that the interactions between PDA and their wasp hosts are mutualistic (by the way, THANK YOU). However, this isn't always the case for original research papers, which is incredibly frustrating because of the ambiguity surrounding the term 'symbiosis'. As such, I'm curious if any of the editors of this page can elucidate for me, based on their experience researching the topic for this page, whether 'symbiotic virus/microbe/bacteria' are generally considered by those in the field as 1) having mutualistic interactions with their host or 2) having one or more commensal/mutualistic/parasitic interactions with their host? To be clear, I'm interested in this because I'm editing a couple of WP pages related to various forms of interspecies interactions, but my review of the literature is constantly hampered by the aforementioned issue. Usually, the context of the article helps, especially if they use 'symbiotic microbe' in reference to a pathogenic relationship with the host, but when the term 'symbiotic virus' pops up without an example to accompany it it's rather impossible to understand how they're using the term 'symbiotic'. SomeEnlightenedNarcissist (talk) 16:00, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question on the general use of 'symbiotic virus' or 'symbiotic microbe' 

message: Could someone fix it? And while at it, the same problem also occurs on the pages "Ichnovirus" and "Bracovirus".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Entomologger (talk • contribs) 16:15, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collapsible lists under "Taxonomy" section not working
Talk:Homophobia

message: By at least 1901 the word was used to mean a fear of men or a fear of males. Oxford English Dictionary documents this, as do other sources on the internet. Therefore, the word was not coined in 1969 by George Weinberg as this article asserts. It is suggested the word was used in the Des Moines (Iowa) Daily News in 1901 with the sense of fear of men or fear of males.
Here are a few examples from print of that meaning:
‘Young women of America have homophobia, you know, just as children have measles.’ the Des Moines Daily News in Iowa (1901)
‘Her salient characteristic was a contempt for the male sex as represented in the human biped […] The seeds of homophobia had been sown early.’ Chambers’s Journal of Popular Literature (1920)
'[H]e imported a whole boxcar of broncos from the West, homophobic mustangs, as it turned out, that nobody but a rodeo hand could have ridden.' F. Reid Buckley, Life Magazine, (1970)
In conclusion, this article is incorrect on the etymology of the word "homophobia". It was coined far earlier than 1969, with records of its use as early as 1901.
Some sources for the above:
https://interestingliterature.com/2023/09/homophobia-word-meaning-origin/
https://www.oed.com/dictionary/homophobia_n1?tab=etymology
https://www.etymonline.com/word/homophobic
203.206.245.175 (talk) 18:22, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The word was not coined in 1969, there are records of its use in 1901 

message: Add wiki hyperlink to Boswell citation 2607:FB60:1011:2006:28C8:67C3:EFC8:1F77 (talk) 04:58, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 November 2023 

message: * https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/28/opinion/south-korea-homophobia-christians.html 
 Bookku    (talk) 15:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs
Talk:Poseidon (horse)

message: To get some improvement, this article could do with a picture.  Some pieces of text could be turned into complete sentences.  Some of those redlinks should be turned into stubs.  When did Poseidon die?  Who was the trainer? Tom Clayton must be worth mentioning in more detail.  It is worth quite a good B, but a few more aditions should be able to get a GA rating. GB 04:32, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Viricide

message: This stub needs serious work.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.188.79.76 (talk) 18:38, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs work 

message: ...the "virucide" spelling?  "Viricide" is also homocide of males.  I think the word for killing viruses has actually been around longer.  But, there at least is an alternative spelling for it. 68.49.138.170 (talk) 02:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Might I suggest...
Talk:Cydia pomonella granulovirus

message: The page has utilized the html "Cydia_pomonella_granulosis_virus" for some time now. However, the ICTV master list for this virus names the species as "Cydia pomonella granulovirus" and not as granulosis virus (I believe this was the former nomenclature which is no longer used). As such I have simply switched the redirect around to make the "Cydia pomonella granulovirus" page the main page for this article and the "Cydia pomonella granulosis virus" page redirect.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by G08j1719 (talk • contribs) 11:47, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Edit
Talk:Cyanophage

message: *Cyanophages needs to be merged into the stub Cyanophage, or Cyanophage needs to be deleted and replaced with Cyanophages. Curt99 (talk) 21:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Hi guys, some of the links to other wikipedia pages contain errors, such as those corresponding pages do not exist (it shows in red). Also the first couple sentences weren't so clear while I was reading it. I had to re-read a couple times. It could be rephrased a bit so it can be easily understood by everyone. It's nice that you have some pictures on there! So far good job guys. Pinky.s (talk) 03:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Concerned that the citation referring to GTA in the adherence section is not appropriate, because GTA is not a phage and not a cyanophage; hence is not strong evidence for the attachment mechanisms for cyanophages.
Curt99 (talk) 20:38, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review 

message: Introduction
-Concise and direct to the point (good)
-good use of neutral language
-Make sure to be more consistent with the citation format [dont use MLA/APA format].
Taxonomy
-Some minor grammatical errors in the second and third sentences (quick fix!)
-Also be more consistent with the citation format
Morphology
-Some minor grammatical errors
-Well-cited (good!)
-good content, but could be made more effective by including some kind of organizing structure (headings for each of the cyanophage sub-types?)
Host
-Please define the acronyms
-Use some kind of organizing structure (heading)
-LINK to other Wikipedia pages (goes for the entire article - when in doubt, link!) :)
-concise, easy to understand
Replication
-Minor errors in tense usage
-Great content! Very interesting, good call to add this in :)
Ecological Significance
-Great content! Really interesting, but could be made more effective by adding some structure (enumerating the different ecosystem services?)
-Be careful about making inferences - "This may explain why Myoviridae primarily infect one of the most abundant cyanobacteria, Synechoccocus, because the probability of collision is higher" (you need to cite this if it's not an inference :))
-slight errors in tense usage
Good job guys! :)
Jj.campp (talk) 05:37, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review 

message: This article seems to offer no information other than an extensive list of papers. Should it be deleted or just trimmed??  Ciar 03:43, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List of publications??
Talk:Hawqala

message: You said "For example, translating the word hawla as "power" is an over-simplification."
No ..
The translating of this word "hawla" is "change" not "power";
In modern Arabic. This isn't modern. Lane's dictionary would be a better source, which also explicates upon the mean meaning of the word in the phrasal context: "There is no strength nor power but in, or by means of, God, the High, the Great. Or, here it signifies motion; and the meaning is, there is no motion nor power, or ability, but by the will of God. Or, as some say the meaning is, there is no howl [i.e. changing, or turning, or receding] from disobedience, nor qowa [i.e. power] to obey, but by the accommodating or disposing of God." http://www.tyndalearchive.com/tabs/lane/ --129.67.144.2 (talk) 12:40, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Enterobacteria phage T2

message: T2, T4, and T6 bacteriophages are all morphologically complex viruses infecting e. coli. They all look the same and are apparently constructed identically. It would be nice to know how they differ (if they were actually the same, presumably they would not have these different names). David spector (talk) 23:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  T2, T4, T6
Talk:Returns (economics)

message: And Now I am going to do both profit and interest because that is what Smith and Ricardo actually did.  They could never seem to make up their alleged minds as to whether money is "capital" or just "money".  But they do a very good job of using the word "stock" as opposed to money or capital.  Stock is _ALWAYS_ "capital stock" as there is no "wages stock" or "rent stock".  Henry George latter takes the position that it makes no difference and he refers to the return to money or stock as "interest" and totally drops the word profit except in an accounting sense having nothing to do with distinct returns to factors of production.--The Trucker (talk) 03:28, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Profit and Interest 

message: Why did we choose a 20% annual interest rate for the chart? That seems unusually high, such as might exist in times of high inflation. 5% or even 7% would seem more typical. The caption should note that the graph does not include taxes and other costs nor does it include inflation as a factor.   ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 01:06, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Graph of returns

message: Return to Labor
Return to Capital
Return to Land
(as percentage of total)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.183.140.205 (talk) 23:16, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long Term Historical Charts 

message: Dr. Neely has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Neely has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Lahaye, Jerome & Neely, Christopher J., 2014. "The role of jumps in volatility spillovers in foreign exchange markets: meteor shower and heat waves revisited," Working Papers 2014-34, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 16:39, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Neely's comment on this article