Talk:Virginia Slims

message: === (Removal) ===
I keep removing vandalism by 65.15.152.194, "Virginia Slims are sometimes refered to as "Vagina Slims," a reference to their being marketed to women." because it had no citation or documentation, warned, now also in violation of 3RR. Chris 19:54, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Urban Dictionary is not a reliable source.  ("Because it is edited by users, it also tends to feature recent neologisms and Internet memes, and its definitions can vary widely in quality.")  Postdlf (talk) 02:01, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like Wikipedia.74.184.72.247 (talk) 16:20, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good reading skills, it is indeed the Wikipedia. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 12:46, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ("Vagina" variants) 

message: I keep removing vandalism by 65.15.152.194, "Virginia Slims are sometimes refered to as "Vagina Slims," a reference to their being marketed to women." because it had no citation or documentation, warned, now also in violation of 3RR. Chris 19:54, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Removal) 

message: I have tried to add the crude nickname of this cig.  It is a well-known nickname so I'm perplexed as to why it is being deleted.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.184.72.247 (talk) 23:42, 5 June 2008‎
:The Urban Dictionary is not a reliable source.  ("Because it is edited by users, it also tends to feature recent neologisms and Internet memes, and its definitions can vary widely in quality.")  Postdlf (talk) 02:01, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like Wikipedia.74.184.72.247 (talk) 16:20, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good reading skills, it is indeed the Wikipedia. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 12:46, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vagina Slimes

message: This image was tagged as lacking a fair use rationale, as it was uploaded long before whatever new procedures have been posted in recent months requiring more detail on the image description page.  I've posted what I consider a valid rationale, but these days I am not on here very often, and so would appreciate any help from other current contributors to this article in making sure the rationale is substantial and detailed enough to fend off any misguided attempts to delete the image.  Cheers, Postdlf 17:45, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising image at [[:Image:1978 virginia slims ad.jpg]] 

message: The article currently states that Superslims are half the diameter of regular Slims. However, assuming both varieties are cylindrical, a cigarette 23mm in circumference would have a diameter of approximately 7.32mm; one that is 21mm in circumference would have a diameter of approx 6.68 mm (d = c/π). Is one or more of these measurements wrong? CulturalSnow (talk) 06:25, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed that too. I know for sure the original Superslims are 21mm - I read that in an internal Philip Morris document at TobaccoDocuments.org. But there is a new packing for SuperSlims - they come a tiny box that is perfectly square, and I believe those are even narrower than the original Superslims. This may be part of the confusion. I have no idea the diameter or circumference of these new ones, but they do appear much thinner - errr, slimmer - than 21mm.  Bryanm61 (talk) 02:26, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Circumference/diameter

message: do you have 120mm cigarette with high nicotine and Tar as my wife she like strong one. 2001:1670:10:A1E4:5A1C:455:3CEF:C5FD (talk) 03:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  About 120mm cigarette with highest nicotine