lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Thessalonians

message: AfDs for this article:
: – (View AfDView log )
:()
No ctiteria of notability is present. "Don't leave readers confused over the list's inclusion criteria or have editors guessing what may be added to the list." (WP:LIST) The list seems to be one's original research. No relible sources are present A1 (talk) 11:10, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This entry should be at the bottom, not the top of the discussion page. Having said that, I agree that entries often need a footnote tying the individual to Thessalonica. But I don't think this is the place to be arguing policy. Too far down the chain. Should be at policy level IMO. Student7 (talk) 20:31, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[List of Thessalonians]]

message: In English Thessalonikaioi are called Thessalonians not Thessalonikians.  Take a look at any bible for Paul's letters.  They are always titled Letters to the Thessalonians.  How do we fix this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.155.135.33 (talk) 17:02, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Then what do you call people from Thessaly? El Greco(talk) 17:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: People from Thessaly in English are called Thessalians.70.107.168.8 (talk) 22:38, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: Are the flags really necessary?  Many of the city's Jewish residents had nothing to do with the state of Israel per se.  Maybe including the names without the flags would be better?
:Removed. Any idea on how to categorize them? El Greco(talk) 15:58, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just redid it alphabetically.  I do not know if it is better like this or not.  But I think it is best to avoid separating people based on their linguistic/ethnic/religious background as that can be kind of tricky.  I also think that this way it shows the rich texture of the city and its historically cosmopolitan past.  How do you feel about this?  Also I was thinking, seeing other cities examples, maybe since the list is so long it could be divided into sections of people that were born in the city, lived in the city, and notable visitors of the city.  I am not too sure about that, maybe we should see how most other cities do it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.247.15.15 (talk) 18:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The alphabetical list looks good. El Greco(talk) 20:35, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Flags

message: I suggest the list be purged of people not footnoted nor with an linked article. Student7 (talk) 01:22, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Purge

message: Footnotes are needed to authenticate residency in Thessaloniki. Student7 (talk) 01:21, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Footnotes

message: ::We need the list reformatted so it is more easily readable, like List of San Diegans. The index takes up way too much whitespace. The code is hidden and I can't get to it. Can any admin help? Student7 (talk) 23:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Index
Talk:HPB

message: Changed "high ping bastards" to "high ping bait".
Explanation: My guess is that some people assume the word "bastards", as that is what the 'b' stands for in LPB. However, the 'b' in LPB is "bastards" because LPB is term used to describe someone with a lower ping, and therefore an advantage. In HPB, it is "bait" because those players are at a disadvantage, and when their ping is high enough they may even appear like bait, completely stationary while the communication between their system and the server has been interrupted.
134.134.136.5 23:39, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Small Dance

message: I have redirected this article to the Tristram Cary page, because:
*The musical piece is sufficiently minor that a standalone article is unwarranted;
*The article makes no assertion of notability for this piece; and
*The Tristram Cary page provides an adequate listing of works, which places this piece in context.
Euryalus 23:51, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect to Tristram Cary
Talk:Gwei Lun-mei

message: One of Taiwan's hidden treasures, Kwai Lun-Mei could very easily be the next Audrey Hepburn with the right director and movie.  Her acting in "Most Distant Course" was nothing short of stunning.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JulieMillerFan (talk • contribs) 18:22, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Was she in Drug War? I can't find her name on any cast list and I don't remember her in that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.115.45.49 (talk) 16:04, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drug War
Talk:Oak Harbor High School (Washington)

message: The qualitative statements as to the school inadequacies are not cited - the ought to either be removed or sourced.  Nicholas SL Smithchatter 05:02, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Feel free to tag them with the  tag or remove them. Arthurrh (talk) 18:15, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations Required 

message: I edited the page, correcting the spelling of "Counseling" center and adding "Special Education" to the department lists for A Wing, B Wing, C, Wing and D Wing. I also changed the title of Vice Principal to Associate Principal and added Bill Weinsheimer as an additional Associate Principal.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pantonleader (talk • contribs) 00:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor Edits 

message: "In 1934 with the aid of WPA labor..."  This needs to be made clearer. --smadge1 (talk) 04:57, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: How is this unclear? Nicholas SL Smithchatter 21:16, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  can someone expand "WPA labor"
Talk:Double Up (R. Kelly song)

message: The objection to this page is as such: "This isn't a single." Well, it doesn't need to be to have its own page. I totally object to your proposed deletion. Why should it matter that it's not a single?
Because, there is no need. The deletion will be put up again. Do not delete it. Read the rules.--FSX-2007 05:09, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Infobox comics story arc

message: Seems like the ISBN is showing below the titles. A bit difficult to describe so see: Demon in a Bottle. (Emperor (talk) 23:56, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, I'd tweaked the 'box for collections like Batman: Anarky where it isn't reall an arc. Missed aminor point though. - J Greb (talk) 00:02, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers. (Emperor (talk) 00:45, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Should be working now... - J Greb (talk) 23:10, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem 

message: The genre tags currently employed as a part of this infobox are woefully inadequate to properly represent the myraid of literary genres that exist. Moreso, the tags are badly coded as using multigenre often leading to a comma at the beginning of the list and does not follow the Manual of Style (Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(capital_letters)#Musical_and_literary_genres) in regards to captitalization. Therefore, the tags should be removed outright (leaving only the "|genre =" tag) or at the very least be recoded to fix the capitalization and comma errors.
Post replies at Template_talk:Infobox_comic_book_title#Removal.2Frevision_of_genre_tags
--Marcus Brute (talk) 00:02, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal/revision of genre tags 

message: Small formatting issue This infobox creates WP:DASH typographical errors (such as on The Lightning Saga) when it generates text such as "April – June 2007" (correctly including the non-breaking space.) The problem with this is that "April" and "June" should be written with only an ndash between them and no space at all. If the date ranges are within the same year, this infobox should generate text such as "April–June 2007" and only create spaced dashes for text such as "April 2009 – June 2010". —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:43, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: FWIW - it's changeable but when there's time. - J Greb (talk) 03:26, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generating [[WP:DASH]] errors 

message: Could someone please change the template code so that the article categories only appear in articles, and not in user pages such as User:ChannelSpider/sandbox/2?  The maintenance categories should still appear in user/draft pages to encourage editors to fix mistakes before moving to articlespace.  Thanks!  GoingBatty (talk) 18:01, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change article categories so they only appear in articles
Talk:OpenDocument Foundation

message: This article is horribly written. Some sentences make no sense at all. Moreover, there are definite relevancy issues. An organization that lasted a couple of years and, essentially, did nothing can hardly be Wikipedia-worthy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.188.144.12 (talk) 09:58, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What does this article have to do with OpenDocument? The term OpenDocument does not appear at all in the article. Biscuittin (talk) 16:41, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  OpenDocument
Talk:2 Canadian Mechanized Brigade Group Headquarters and Signal Squadron

message: Require up-to-date info on TF 5-10 currently deployed with LCol Chris McGuffin.AKMacPherson (talk) 03:52, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kandahar 
Talk:Prostatitis/Archive 2

message: I carefully checked out prostatitis.org before removing the link. The site is full of broken links and is poorly maintained. The site sells items directly to the public. In addition it offers information about infertility, sleep apnoea, prostate cancer and BPH, all jumbled up with the prostatitis information in a way that implies the conditions may be related, even though no science exists to link these conditions. On its "Information from various sources" page, it suggests that biofilm and infections are important to chronic nonbacterial prostatitis patients, but there is no solid research evidence to support it. The site does not specify whether it exists to give information to patients with Cat I, II, III or IV prostatitis, although these are completely different conditions, conflated at their website so that dangerous confusion is sown. On its Links page, there are links to individual businesses run by urologists who could be paying for the placement. There's no other reason to have those links there. The doctors featured are not leaders in the field or specialists in the subject. There are also a bunch of links completely unrelated to prostatitis (Peyronies disease, impotence, quackwatch etc). It simply looks like a typical low quality website, home-grown, amateurish, neglected, unfocused, offering outdated, often incorrect and largely POV information (see Neutral point of view) that flies in the face of research. The site does not meet the standards for inclusion as an external link on WP. The site tries to promote ideas outside the mainstream of medical science; I can supply numerous examples if required. WP does not promote or link to sites pushing non-mainstream medical viewpoints that have scant or no research support. WP guidelines state that:
 Links to be avoided :
 1) Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain
 2) Any site that misleads the reader by use of factually inaccurate material or unverifiable research.
In reference to point (1) above, it is clear that the WP article itself is far more up-to-date and accurate than prostatitis.org. Examples can be provided.
And I can provide ample evidence of point (2).
I therefore oppose linking to it, no matter what tax status it has. 
◄██  Unit 5 (Talk)  ██► 04:31, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While I won't dispute your removal of that link, but there is a lot of good info on that website to help guide people through the various forms of protatitis. I only hope that the reader sees this discussion page so they can check out that website. Jtpaladin 17:19, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: re prostatitis.org - there may be some 'OK' information on the site but it's hidden within a realm of bad links, adverts and I don't think it gives the visitor any real or significant guidance on how to combat this condition, which I've had for 7 years. Too much reference and talk about bacteria as well for my liking. I'd be just as well doing a google search!  Silverye 06:19, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of link to prostatitis.org
Talk:Episcopal Academy

message: Hi
Sorry but this article is a real mess. It is more like a brochure than an encyclopedia article.
THe section "Others" - other than what ? maybe it should be titled "School song" or similar
The rest needs re-organising and cutting down in size - especially trivial and unecessary information whcih needs removing.
It is not really notable then it should not be in there - I am surprised it does not list the toilets and how many blades of grass there are on each field.
Chaosdruid (talk) 04:29, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Still an issue. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:28, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad article and unencyclopaedic
Talk:1940 Constitution of Cuba

message: The article contains the following language:
<Blockquote>The 1940 Constitution of Cuba, was implemented in 1940, during the presidency of Batista.</Blockquote>
While it is true that Batista was a major, if not "the," power in Cuba from 1934 -1944,  he was not President of Cuba until 10-20-1940.  This Constitution came into effect in 7/1940 under Federico Laredo Brú's Presidency. At the very least, some clarification is required in the wording of this article.  Franklin Moore (talk) 06:39, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

message: The article Platt Amendment says [unsourced] that this constitution 'eliminated' the amendment from the 1940 Constitution. Nothing here says so - is it true?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.97.11.54 (talk) 11:32, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Platt amendment 

message: There was a national election 1958 Cuban general election by the People of Cuba who elected Andrés Rivero Agüero. The inconvenient truth is that the self appointed "new government", not Batista, were the ones that overthrew a dully elected government and the Constitution of 1940.  ovA_165443 (talk) 13:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: The Constitution of 1940 was suspended in January, 1959
Talk:Order of the German Eagle

message: First the article mentions that at least two Germans got the award (von Neurath & von Ribbentrop) while the list farther down lists two more: 
# Dr. Wilhelm Frick, Reichsminister
# Heinrich Himmler, Reichsführer
Please some expert, straight this out, jan --JanBarkmann (talk) 18:48, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insonsistencies 

message: We've got a photo of Lindbergh's award over in commons. It got scrubbed from his article, but it might be of interest here. Rklawton (talk) 19:05, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Talk:155 mm SpGH Zuzana

message: Looking for people to create separate pages for vz. 2000 Zuzana and Zuzana 2, as I think those 2 SPG's are different significantly enough.
I might start working on them myself, but I'm not sure if I'll have time for creating 2 whole pages alone anytime soon.
My idea is something like these Slovakian wiki pages: 
https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/155mm_samohybn%C3%A1_kan%C3%B3nov%C3%A1_h%C3%BAfnica_vz._2000_Zuzana
https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/155mm_samohybn%C3%A1_kan%C3%B3nov%C3%A1_h%C3%BAfnica_Zuzana_2 
Btw I don't understand where this "... due to automation, the number of crew members is reduced from 4 to 3" came from. Not a single source listed claimed that, nor was I able to find any other source. Some articles already copied that and a debate on Twitter with confused people ultimately led me here to correct this wiki page.
MirorEgo (talk) 06:41, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate pages for vz. 2000 Zuzana and Zuzana 2 needed, crewmember numbers confusion
Talk:The Saga of Crystar

message: I'm pretty sure Crystar was a toy and cartoon first and a comic book third, you might want to fix that. --69.141.206.123 00:38, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I remember watching this cartoon when I was a kid.  It was on super-early, like 6:30AM, and it didn't last long.  Of course, I thought it was totally cool.  I just thought of it today, and was surprised that it was also a comic book.  I couldn't be remembering a comic book, since I never read them.  It was definitely also a cartoon (animated).  Anybody have any info on it?--216.227.81.26 (talk) 06:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you guys are both misremembering.  There was never a Crystar cartoon.  See the Crystar entry on Don Markstein's Toonopedia, for example, or the Branded in the 80s blog, both of which attribute the failure of the brand with the fact that there was no associated cartoon.  Also, the toys came out first, but the comic book was created first (though not published until afterwards), as a marketing solicitation by Marvel Comics.  Cheers.  Ford MF (talk) 18:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

text: No, this did exist as a cartoon. Sorry that you don't remember it, as it was pretty cool. No comics in my house, just cartoons before school and on Saturdays. I have just googled the heck out of it and I'm not finding references. Then again, the search is SO crowded with the comic book and I can't dedicate the time to hope that someone else saw this extremely short run. I remember it started, and I only saw it as a result of getting up extra early one day for school.  It was so cool, I started getting up early every day just to catch it. Then, all of a sudden, gone! I was terribly disappointed. I did find stickers for the cartoon for my sticker book collection (unlike comic books, stickers *were* something I had (big in the early eighties).74.209.21.82 (talk) 14:53, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline issues 

message: Hello I am Crystal, I am a victim of fraud and abuse and now learning the.android developer skills to stop this group of people doing this to my community schools and our children.  I go by the user name Crystal Manifest my Birthday is 08/06/1983 it's funny cus you story marching about about my life I love this story and I hope I can reach my goal in saving someone any one . I believe it's not to late and I have been trying to let the world know that . Even if it take me a life time I believe the children are the answer we have to show them because with out them we have no future, those video gamer have the power in there hands to move the Stars 🤗 it up to us to show them 2603:8081:3505:619C:71FF:5095:4440:4744 (talk) 14:54, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fraud and abuse
Talk:Newhaven Fort

message: There is no reason why this should be a separate article to the main town article - hence the merge proposal Peter Shearan (talk) 13:15, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:The Little Humpbacked Horse (ballet)

message: I do not mean to be rude or unappreciative to the person or people who have made contributions to this article, but there are several passages that just make no sense and I am removing them. You can leave a message here on this talk page if you like about what you are trying to say and we can work on making it into understandable information we can put into the article. Also I am removing statements such as "there is no such nation" (as the Urals),"According to the idea of the choreographer, the ballet praised the Tsar for the abolition of serfdom " and "These ballets were typically criticized as parodies."Statements such as these need citations to reliable sources.Smeat75 (talk) 14:37, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing uncited and incoherent/ unintelligible passages
Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Islamophobia/Criticism

message: For those not in the know, the mediation session for the Islamophobia article has thus far resulted in a proposed rewrite of the "criticism" section, which is attached to this discussion page. Is it good? Is this rewrite neutral and all the other things you'd want in an article section? MessedRocker (talk) (write this article) 00:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it's walking a nice tight line between the two. But, not knowing the history of the article or previous objections, the value of my opinion might be limited. Keep up the good work!Phyesalis (talk) 06:57, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:American Paint Horse Association

message: I would really love to know if this horse is still in the state of Texas. She had one blue eye one brown eye... Oh I don't one side except her lip was black around the edge that made her look like a carousel horse a carousel horse. I am just desperate to know she is still alive, please 24.245.79.17 (talk) 10:19, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A medicine hat paint with the registered name of nomo or no more consequences
Talk:Crossed-field amplifier

message: Since this is likely a variation on the TWT = traveling wave tube, it is l]]ikely capable of coherent output. The magnetron is an oscillator which is not capable of coherent output nor amplification, so the simularity is likely only in the multi megawatt pulse output. See also coupled cavity traveling wave tube, magnetron, maser, klystron and traveling wave tube. Ccpoodle 01:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

message: The currently linked single source LMhandbook.pdf "Apollo Operation Handbook-Lunar Module LMA790-3-LM 10, VOL 1, Subsystems Data" for this page is likely to become unavailable in less than ten days as BTinternet free web hosting is to be closed on 30 October 2012. --220 of Borg 04:51, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Scanned document available at http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/LM10HandbookVol1.pdf. See diff  -- 220 of Borg 05:15, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: One Source