lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Commonwealth of England

message: I am going to partially revert this edit by Aanderson@amherst.edu, because two of the thee facts are correct. If there is repetition then edits elsewhere may be needed.
Source for the sequence of events:
*
From List of Ordinances and Acts of the Parliament of England, 1642–60
*9 October 1646 Ordinance for the abolishing of Archbishops and Bishops in England and Wales and for settling their lands and possessions upon Trustees for the use of the Commonwealth.
----
*6 January 1648/9 Act erecting a High Court of Justice for the trial of the King.
*30 January 1648/9 Act prohibiting the proclaiming any person to be King of England or Ireland or the Dominions thereof.
:30 January 1648/49 execution of Charles I
*17 March 1648/9 Act for abolishing the kingly office in England, Ireland and the Dominions thereunto belonging
*19 March 1648/9 Act abolishing the House of Peers.
*19 May 1649 Act Declaring and Constituting the People of England to be a Commonwealth and Free-State
* 27 September 1650 Act for the relief of the religious and peaceable from the Rigour of former Acts of Parliament, in matters of Religion.
-- PBS (talk) 01:06, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually while it may be a duplication it is more accurate than the part you have highlighted "Just before and after the execution of King Charles ..." All of the acts mentioned were passed after the execution and not just after (which would imply days, possibly weeks) but more than a month and a half later. As I said If there is repetition then edits elsewhere may be needed. -- PBS (talk) 01:33, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: PBS, while I agree that is better, it is a small matter and I would prefer that you edit this first sentence to your liking instead of restoring this last sentence, which I find to be a distraction since it makes me stop and think to myself “didn’t I just read this?”. — AA  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aanderson@amherst.edu (talk • contribs) 02:02, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

text: As you highlight, with this instance, Wikipedia is a camel (a horse designed by a committee). My point is that the whole paragraph needs rewriting, and deleting the more accurate sentence does not help fix he problem. I am willing to do it by I am not sure when as I have several other pressing issues I am dealing with, in the mean time I do not think that your initial solution fixes the problem. So yes if you do not make the changes I will do so, but I am not sure when. -- PBS (talk) 12:18, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sequence of events 

message: I may be doing some addition, I do not see any comments from the past five years, but please correct anything I add that may be erroneous. Notarealperson2 (talk) 19:17, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible revisions and additions to come...?
Talk:Columbia University tunnels

message: I have concerns about the map image.  We don't seem to have any real policy for how WP:V applies to images, but it should.  If I were to write in the text of the article, "It is rumored that there is a tunnel connecting Low Library to Uris Hall", without a WP:RS, it would be (or at least should be) deleted.  Yet, that's exactly what the image says, in graphical form, with no better sourcing than, "Based on the original map by Mike Schiraldi...." in the image legend.  It's basically WP:OR.  I'm tempted to delete the image.  Comments? -- RoySmith (talk) 00:43, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Primefac (talk) 15:23, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

text: Thank you for making the page far less useful. 158.222.138.89 (talk) 01:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Columbia University Tunnels.png vs. [[WP:V]]
Talk:Sinulog

message: Why would Rajah Humabon want to be named after Carlos of Spain. Was this what he actually agreed to. Didn't the Rajah view himself as a king.
~~  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.203.63.25 (talk) 03:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Rejection of sovereignty 

message: At this site,  there is an explanation why the nomenclature and orthography keeps changing. It hardly needs emphasizing orthography changes with time, with the persons and nationalities of those who're spelling the nomenclature, with fashion, with idiosyncrasies. Let me quote an injunction from this site, "Today, the Austrian descendants, and most of the academic community,  use the 'Habsburg' spelling.  I've opted for the 'Hapsburg' variation, one that was in vogue pre-1980 when much of the focus was on the Spanish branch of the family, for practical  reasons, namely that the domain hapsburg was available and habsburg was not.  For the purposes of this project the actual spelling of the name is secondary in importance and should not hinder the reader's understanding of the facts or arguments." --Vicente Calibo de Jesus (talk) 15:21, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There can be no justification for opting for that horrid spelling. Str1977 (talk) 12:00, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Habsburg, Hapsburg, Hapsburgh, Habisburch, Habichtsburg

message: I think this article needs to differentiate clearly between what is fact and what is fiction. To me, the article comes off like Christian revisionist history toward a pre-existing indigenous tradition. 
There is also a lot of repetition and conflicting information. I'm not familiar with this subject to feel comfortable editing it, so just pointing this out. --Pythagimedes (talk) 05:26, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact vs fiction & christianization
Talk:Gawker Media

message: Two of the names blogs on this page are links, but they just redirect to this page (Gawker Media).  The others are broken links.  Why exactly is this a useful thing? --Jfruh 02:31, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect links

message: The opening section says both of the following:
1. On August 16, 2016, Gawker and all its brands were acquired at auction by Univision Communications.[7] Two days later on August 18, the company announced that Gawker.com would cease operations the following week, while its other sites will continue to operate.[8]
2. On September 21, 2016, Gawker Media's assets except for Gawker were purchased by Univision Communications and have been moved to Gizmodo Media Group.[9][10]
These need to be verified and condensed. -Reagle (talk) 17:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant and contrary claims in intro
Talk:Pay toilet

message: Could someone familiar with pay toilets add the usual spectrum of cost? Having never visited and area that has pay toilets, I don't have any idea how much is generally charged. I presume it varies, of course. Phasmatisnox 02:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there's the old bathroom-wall-poem, which may not be accurate anymore, but doubtless used to be:
Here I sit, broken-hearted,
paid my dime, but only farted,
Very next day, I took a chance,
Saved my dime, but soiled my pants.
------
They way I've always heard it it went:
Here I sit ALL broken hearted,
tried to shit but only farted.
As an aside, when I was in Russia in 1993, at the airport in Samara getting in is no problem, you have to pay to get out. Kielhofer 04:17, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cost

message: ive read that they were shut down (in only us or otherwise im not sure) when womens groups complained and/or sued because they felt discriminated because they had to pay to piss but men could just use the urinal. any truth?Д narcistPig (talk) 23:01, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  womens rights 

message: what is the difference between urinals and toilets?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.102.211.132 (talk) 02:41, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: check out the Wikipedia articles on urinal and toilet - I think the difference is quite clear. EvM-Susana (talk) 20:21, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  difference between toilets and urinals 

message: I think this should be merged into the article on public toilet as there is a lot of overlap. I will also put the same on the talk page of public toilet. EvM-Susana (talk) 20:21, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Have added the merge templates today. Discuss on talk page of public toilet article.EvMsmile (talk) 12:36, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with article on public toilets?

message: You can discuss why you reverted the edit here 86.158.96.109 (talk) 13:29, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Why age of a technology does not guarantee moral legitimacy

message: However, those toilets are free only to people with valid Metro tickets.https://www.huffingtonpost.fr/2018/01/29/votre-titre-de-transport-vous-donnera-bientot-un-acces-gratuit-aux-toilettes-des-gares_a_23346329/
Perhaps the photo should be changed.
Bartosik (talk) 12:34, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo says "Toilettes acces gratuit" which basically means "free toilet"
Talk:Ray Martin (television presenter)

message: This article reads like a press release written by channel 9. I certainly don't consider him a good journalist. Anyone ever actually _watch_ ACA? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bumnut (talk • contribs) 10:16, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: His pay packet and staying power all these years says otherwise. 202.191.107.40 12:44, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV? 

message: Not to anyone reading this, find a better picture of raymartin, it looks like someone used a webcam to snap a picture off their broken TV 202.191.107.40 12:44, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A broken tv that had Vaseline spread thick all over it 202.191.107.40 12:45, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: The Criticism para has been re-inserted. The previous editor's deletion on the grounds of potential libel is spurious. The entry complies with Australian defamation law, with the defences of truthful comment and valid literary criticism. Someone is being too precious. The previous editor who removed the entry on the grounds of bias is also being too precious, as the entries regarding Martin's support for Dr Holt's "microwave therapy" are entirely truthful and referenced. Martin falsely raised the hope of those suffering cancer and their families, for which he is being justly criticised.
In the meantime go to the NHMRC website announcing the release of their Report at http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/news/media/rel05/holt.htm
Finally, who is protecting Martin from IP address 58.172.129.216? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BogongMoth (talk • contribs) 00:50, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism:
Talk:List of string theory topics

message: Is there a timeline of the events of the early universe according to string theory? Memenen 02:46, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Timeline?

message: This article started life as a list, and is a list per community policy and guideline consensus. Per WP:BRD etc I have reverted the rename pending discussion for these renames. See the talk page of WP:OUTLINE (a disputed/failed policy proposal). Moves should be discussed. Verbal chat 10:03, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "List of" name
Talk:Ripple-down rules

message: Seems to rely heavily on the work of P. Compton; need expansion of the ideas here. Harvey the rabbit (talk) 21:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

message: Could someone explain why are these rules called 'ripple-down'? English is not my mother tongue so I don't really understand what does 'ripple-down' mean.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.139.61.202 (talk) 14:14, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whence the name
Talk:Zecharia Sitchin

message: I read both
reaching the Solar System roughly every 3,600 years.
returning to the inner Solar System regularly every 3,600 years,
On purely astronomical grounds, I would add inner to the first phrase, but this is not a purely astronomical point, because Sitchin's book is not of this kind.
NOTE: I have written this comment because I had to "explain" Sitchin work to an **** (untranslatable italian word) and the difference of the two phrases allowed two different interpretations that explained alternatively ... what you may image. 151.29.149.29 (talk) 12:22, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I added "inner". --Hob Gadling (talk) 12:54, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  3600 years
Talk:Coffea canephora

message: What was the original usage of robusta beans? Komitsuki (talk) 16:52, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Previous usage 

message: The contents in Coffea canephora and Robusta coffee laregely overlap, and I think it might be better off merged. Currently Arabica coffee redirects to Coffea arabica, so I suggest that we redirect Robusta coffee to Coffea canephora likewise. --Brett (talk) 19:34, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 05:21, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 14 December 2018 

message: The "Cultivation and use" section is very badly written, with a lot of repetition of the same 3 facts with different words. It should be revised (won't do it because I lack confidence in my English)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.31.207.141 (talk) 20:19, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Badly written
Talk:Seoul Subway Line 2

message: 1) There are grammar errors.
2) This is confusing:  How do the two branches relate to the main branch?
3) A schematic or at least a clear link to a schematic or the Seoul subway's own site would really help.211.225.34.185 (talk) 04:08, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed grammar errors. Added map to External Links Section. Hope it helps :)  Rickinasia (talk) 16:41, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  work needed

message: Clicking on "Cyber Station - Map, station and route finder" in the External Links section gets me this message:
"웹 보안에 위반되어 페이지가 차단되었습니다. 담당자에게 확인 바랍니다."
Correct me if I'm wrong, as I don't read Korean, but I assume it means that it's a bad link. 108.246.205.134 (talk) 07:15, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads up. I'll fix it. ₪RicknAsia₪ 14:55, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad link? 

message: The claim that Line 2 is the world's longest subway loop line appears to based on the total length of Line 2's loop (47km) plus Line 2's branch lines (Seongsu and Sinjeong) of 5.4km and 6.0km.  The recently completed Beijing Subway Line 10, which runs in a loop of 57.1km, appears have a longer loop than Line 2. ContinentalAve (talk) 00:58, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Great find. Thanks for the update. ₪RicknAsia₪ 06:32, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  longest loop 

message: Hello, I am thinking of putting a route map (below) just before the “See also” section, mainly to show how the two branches diverge from the circle. What do you think? --Minoa (talk) 17:30, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Pinging  as significant contributor to this article, for the user's opinion. --Minoa (talk) 19:16, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I am touched that you are asking for my opinion. I haven't been involved in the subway pages for awhile, so I'm not sure how common these are. The map you made is very well done and looks great! If you can find a spot for it, plug it in as I believe it will be useful. ₪RicknAsia₪ 15:32, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route map 

message: Hello, I quite do not understand how that line function with its branches : are there trains running only on the loop ; train only inside branches (eg people must transfer) ? Or do train may either branches ? Bouzinac (talk) 21:34, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route
Talk:Seoul Subway Line 7

message: I added Korean text (wiki-linked to the Korean article) for Gasan Digital Complex because there appears to be no English language article for this station. Please do not remove this. I will add further Korean text to the other station names as time permits. 220.76.15.52 (talk) 03:48, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Korean text 

message: I live in Bucheon and I have watched for 2 years now as they build the station in my neighbourhood.  Recent advertising suggests the name of the station will be Sangdong Station (the neighbourhood name) and not Theme Park.  The only theme parks nearby are the WaterJoy (swimming) and the Bucheon Intangible Cultural Heritage Expo (BICHE) grounds (the latter is closed 11 months of the year).  The Animation Museum and a Circus are under construction.  No theme parks worth naming the station that.  Also, Bucheon City Hall station appears correct although I cannot vouch for other names.  They are currently promising finished in 2010.  We'll see (since they were supposed to finish in 2008).  Darkpoet (talk) 05:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station names 

message: I had saw that in the article that Seoul Metro Line 7 is classified as a commuter rail line however in my belief it feels more of a metro line given if treated like any other metro line and does not even share any mainline Korail Lines 2406:3400:31F:AFD0:937:8679:1745:4F38 (talk) 05:25, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why isn't Line 7 a rapid transit line?
Talk:BRLESC

message: Thanks for the rewrite.  This reference says "a fifth of a million operations per second" which is probably more accurate then 5,000,000 in another reference http://ftp.arl.army.mil/~mike/comphist/hist.html.  --Bubba73 03:36, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks 

message: see here for the probably right punch tape code. --Alexander.stohr (talk) 16:56, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  5 level code 

message: The link in the article is dead, but the PDF can be downloaded from the bottom of
this page.  I don't know how to make that a reference.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 07:48, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  reference to "50 Years of Army Computing"
Talk:Tartrazine

message: Perhaps create a section devoted to the production of tartrazine (i.e. what it is derived from). There is a very common claim about tartrazine being derived from coal tar, though I have yet to find information from credible sources on this.--ΣΨΦ (talk) 05:30, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production of Tartrazine
Talk:Moon landing

message: this should be updated to reflect Intuitive’s lander landing and functioning. 71.191.50.222 (talk) 04:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beresheet no longer private entity closest to success 

message: In the current lede section many precise dates are provided. Because this article isn't principally about the history of moon landings and because these dates are available in the linked supporting articles, shortened dates (i.e. just years) likely increase the article's readability. (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 23:58, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Precise dates in the lede 

message: Hellouts (talk) 16:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Liu1126 (talk) 16:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: And it hasn't happened anyway. 1) Just launched 2) a cubesat that won't land. Canterbury Tail talk 16:12, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  dude pakistan just landed on the moon with SUPARCO, i need to update it. 

message: IM-1 landing coordinates: https://geohack.toolforge.org/geohack.php?pagename=IM-1¶ms=80.13_S_1.44_E_globe:moon LakhnawiNawab (talk) 18:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please update the map, IM-1 has landed and soon change6 will also
Talk:Samantha Geimer

message: I've done a partial merge.  Anyone think more should be moved? --ssd 04:15, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: Pellaa youtubessa hill climb racing2 ja critical opssia 109.240.11.214 (talk) 21:18, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Julle geimer
Talk:Arts Vision

message: Just now I had to correct two names (most noticeably Tomomichi Nishimura) since the names were written in Traditional Japanese Spelling as opposed to Hepburn Japanese Spelling.  Watch out for syllables such as "Shi", "Chi", "Ji", "Tsu", "Zu", et. al. because I caught two errors.  Always try to spell a name in Hepburn Japanese. — Vesther 22:21, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hepburn Japanese 

message: http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2007-05-28/av-chairman-arrested
Should this be added on?  It pretty much affects Arts Vision as a whole, with their website even going down for a while with some sort of apologies.  Sera404 12:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arts Vision chairman involved in scandal 

message: Seiyū Suzumura Kenichi has officially left Arts Vision on 02 April 2012. Besides, I noticed that a few of the names listed were no longer affiliated with AV either. I'm not good in Japanese so anyone, help please? Also, I suggest dividing the seiyū list into male and female categories since there're like hundred over seiyū with AV. 
The full list can be viewed here  http://www.artsvision.co.jp/profile.php 
115.133.48.241 (talk) 10:11, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates, please
Talk:Gustav Hasford

message: One thing I was curious about, was the extent to which Hasford's The Phantom Blooper influenced the movie Full Metal Jacket... I know the film was loosely based on The Short-Timers, but there seems to be some dialogue used from Blooper as well (especially some of R. Lee Ermey's lines)... Anyone know?  J.
FMJ came out in 1987 and Blooper came out in 1990. I would guess that maybe Gus reused some dialogue, either taking from his Blooper draft when working on the screenplay or possibly vice-versa. Supervert 12:44, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kae Araki

message: Whoever started this article got Araki's Birth Name wrong.  The correct translation for Araki's Birth Kanji should be Yoshie Abe.  Kae Araki is now represented by 81 Produce, the same agency representing Yuuki Matsuda (K' from KOF), Shinichirou Miki (Sagat from SF), and Kunihiko Yasui (Iori Yagami from KOF). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.173.115.170 (talk • contribs) .
:This was originally based off of Hitoshi Doi's info, but I've since learned that his site has turned up some inaccuracies... **;;; Ranma9617 06:25, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Japanese wikipedia page lists the birth name (or 本名 "real name") as 阿部 佳恵（あべ かえ）Abe Kae, not "Yoshie". Those kanji can be read "Kae" in addition to "Yoshie". --nihon 21:40, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Um... what does this person actually do? OK so there are clues (like voice actor stub at the bottom) but nothing in the intro. ::Supergolden:: 16:04, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just edited it, but it did say she was a seiyū before. If you click the link, you can learn all about that. I'll be expanding the article soon. (^_^) --日本穣 17:58, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context 
Talk:KCeasy

message: Shouldn't it automatically support all of the networks that gIFT supports? — Omegatron 15:42, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are only three plugins available on the latest Win DL: Ares, Gnutella & OpenFT. Others are available (see article)_> MonstaPro:Talk:Contrib. 13:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  It currently supports 