Talk:Volumetric display

message: Does anyone know the patent application citation to go along with the Microsoft "new display type" section that someone recently added? --Gregg Favalora 12:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microsoft display? 

message: Found this version and linked to it.  
* Laser plasma display — uses a focused pulse laser to create balls of plasma in normal air
Possibly related articles: Laser-induced fluorescence, Blooming (Blooming (laser)).  Physicists?  — Omegatron 03:05, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, blooming seems to be unrelated.  It's an effect in which the air absorbs some energy from the laser and because of the heat change its index of refraction changes and the beam starts to diverge.  Not absorbing so much it plasmafies, from what I can tell. — Omegatron 03:46, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laser plasma version 

message: I recently made an entry for "holovision" and somebody directed it here. That's fine but I intended it to mostly refer to the science fiction idea of holovision. The science fiction references wouldn't fit well here.--Projectautoman 15:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  Where was it originally?  Could it be merged with holodeck maybe? — Omegatron 15:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

text: It should probably be a disambig page, unless there's a specific usage that always uses the term. — Omegatron 04:01, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holovision 

message: What does "helical cross-sectioned" mean? —Tamfang (talk) 21:36, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. The article provides a great starting point to comprehend this technology, which is still being developed into a potential consumer electronic. Andreba (talk) 07:26, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  i can't visualize it 

message: What if short-band radio wave lasers were pulsed from three directions focusing on one point to create a microscopic point  of plasma, and that plasma was used as a lens to distribute light from three colored lasers, creating a high definition voxel, and then applying this setup to a grid to create a three dimensional display, that, with the right imaging technology, could be set up as a safe interactive display, due to the fact that the actual plasma is so small, and therefore dissipates quickly, and imaging technology could be used to eliminate the possibility that small points of plasma form inside your hand? Would this work? I am looking for some educated opinion here, so feedback would be appreciated.
Curious individual (talk) 03:42, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  theoretical question 

message: What about approaches such as pCubee (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89OoXyuxTLM) or this 3D display for AR (https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7836500/ and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LP7GG6t2j-g) that seem relevant and interesting but I don't know where to place them. Would anyone be interesting in debating their place here?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lonnibesancon (talk • contribs) 23:06, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking Glass Factory produces "light field displays", not "volumetric displays". Their displays don't display voxels in a volume. ---- Cooper2222 (talk) 15:37, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other approaches? 

message: I don't think "occlusion-capable volumetric displays" are volumetric displays. They are better classified as "light field displays" instead. They display a series of "views" (just like other light field displays), rather than display a series of "slices" (like normal swept-volume volumetric displays).
@Gregg Favalora
Cooper2222 (talk) 05:19, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Occlusion-capable volumetric displays" are not volumetric displays