Talk:Brighton Park crossing

message: There is a great deal more technical information about the Brighton Park crossing, interlocking, monitoring, and control which could be added however this is a fairly good start. Fredric Rice (talk) 17:14, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  More could be added 

message: This article sort of reads like it was written by a signal vendor's PR department.  I cleaned up what I could, but the author keeps trying to revert it.  Even right now it seems to be violating WP:DISCRIMINATE, but I don't want to get too nitpicky about that.Sturmovik (talk)
: You did needed improvements to the article but also removed text which covers the interlocking functionality; we need both your updated on this article and the original functionality text -- and on the Pershing Main article, come to think of it. 
: If you wish, your improved updates that fixed broken syntax I can merge back in to the original text, yet it's not really a good idea to remove text because it rings like advertising -- which it certainly does in places -- or because you're not familiar with the hardware and software on the crossing which you may have thought was "signaling" when it is actually part of the interlock.
: I was one of the senior software engineers which developed the interlocking, I am the sole engineer that developed 100% of the software which allows the WAG hardware to convey Home/Distant interlocking relay information up and down the wayside for the interlogs. I'm intimatly familiar with all aspects of the installation, so I would hope that you will accept that I'm highly knowledgeable about the Brighting Park / Pershing Main interlocks.
: The functionality in this article is referenced out in the real world, we can not allow information avbout core functionality to be removed, but the article certainly needs syntax improvement. Damotclese (talk) 16:39, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  What is there now is too much detail that the average reader cannot understand and needs to be drastically simplified.  Moreover PTC is not a core functionality of the interlocking and hasn't even been installed yet.  It's nothing but speculation and has nothing to do with Brighton Park Crossing.  I could cut and past the paragraph you write into any similar article on any rail junction.  Just because the information is accurate does not mean it should be included if it prevents A) hinders the average reader from learning the relevant detail and B) if the information does not pertain to Brighton Park crossing in and of itself.  Countless interlockings use the same technology.  If you want to talk about it create a new page or add it to the Interlocking page.Sturmovik (talk) 03:18, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Railfans have no such difficulty understanding the interlocking or grade crossing functionality as described here for several years. Alterations and removal of detailed functionality reduces the article's appeal and legitimacy. Also the Brighton Park / Pershing Main interlocks are unique, you are mistaken that the functionality described here is used everywhere. I'm in the industry, I was highly involved in the engineering, research and development for this interlock, I'm obviously much more knowledgeable of this site than you are, ergo the information you removed was restored and will remain restored. Damotclese (talk) 16:35, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wikipedia is not for Railfans, it is for the general public.  A layperson cannot be expected to understand the information as it is being presented.  I am going to revert your changes and I challenge you to being in an admin because you will lose.Sturmovik (talk) 17:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  No need for any admin, however arbitration is needed. We can not have legitimate content that has been present for almost a decade get removed by someone who does not understand the content. Removed your inappropriate classification once again and sending to arbitration. Damotclese (talk) 18:25, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Randomly selected third party review: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:The_Illusive_Man#RFC_request_for_third_party_review Damotclese (talk) 18:40, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads Like a Vendor Brochure 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Brighton Park crossing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.safetran.com/product/new/geo.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.safetran.com/product/Communications/Section%20A/Comm%20A-3-5.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090930154442/http://www.wrsa.com.au/DEPT/Marketing/common/datasheets.nsf/96dcdd1c8dd4d06d4a2567c4000fd98e/abaa9d1504e459d0ca256bc300777e95/%24FILE/Datasheet%2010B-24.pdf to http://www.wrsa.com.au/DEPT/Marketing/common/datasheets.nsf/96dcdd1c8dd4d06d4a2567c4000fd98e/abaa9d1504e459d0ca256bc300777e95/%24FILE/Datasheet%2010B-24.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.safetran.com/product/Signal/pdf%20Bsection/SIG%20B-13-9.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.safetran.com/product/Communications/Section%20A/Comm%20A-3-22.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091220060432/http://www.echelon.com/communities/developers/lonworks/protocol/ to http://www.echelon.com/communities/developers/lonworks/protocol/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified