lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Malay Dilemma

message: The problems of Malaysia are the common problems of most nations in the history of the world.  They sold themselves out, and despite any strict codes of conduct, they still sold each other out.  By the Prisoner's dilemma they mostly did not cooperate with each other and instead--when against superior organized and superior armed forces--they decided to defect in mass.  The British has a history of being very well organized due to conflict and threat of repeated invasions where the sea became obvious for their survival, so they guarded the sea routes and defended Britain with the sea.  Because they were superior organized with a natural large moat when the New World was found the British were up to the task to take a piece of it leading to Austria, Canada, United States, and New Zealand in addition to having trade across the world giving them better economic opportunities than many other nations including China (that is infamous for internal corruption and selling each other out where the United States and British military stood up to over 20,000 Chinese soldiers in the Boxer Rebellion for over thirty days and won with less than 1,000 soldiers and one engineer priest).  Malaysia met the British, but the British never had the military power to take all of the nations they traded with, so what the British did was organize, inflict common law on the people where they could, and then watched the natives upstage each other instead of cooperate and have national identity.  India is a good example of this where a few well won battles took the rest of India, as the natives were incapable of organizing without selling each other out (defect in the Prisoner's Dilemma).
: Above statement are irrelevant to this wiki entry. And Malaysia does not exist prior 1963. --Sltan 03:29, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems of Malaysia

message: Perhaps someone can give summary for each topic  --Sltan 03:29, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary of each topic in the book 

message: Did Mahathir mentioned Malays traditional values, culture and virtue in the book? --Sltan 03:29, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. He did vehemently criticised the Malay adat or customs. I'm compiling more infos on criticism against the book. --Tikar aurum (talk) 11:19, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critics 

message: not a bad idea to include it. Chensiyuan 17:19, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I include the infobox with ISBN already. --Tikar aurum (talk) 11:19, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ISBN
Talk:British 3rd Division (World War I)

message: #REDIRECT Talk:3rd (United Kingdom) Division
How are divisions to be named?  This division was in numerous major battles in the Napoleonic wars.  
Should 
1. A new entry (e.g., "British 3rd Division (Napoleonic wars)") be created to record those battles;
2. We change the name of this to "British 3rd Division"; or
3. We leave the name the same, but and just add the Napoleonic battles here? Deet 14:09, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

message: Converted infobox to new Infobox Military Unit as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history. —ERcheck @ 01:18, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox conversion for WikiProject Military history
Talk:Mahesh Manjrekar

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.bollywoodvillage.com/Mahesh-Manjrekar.html?option=com_celebrity&view=celebrity&task=detail&id=384 http://www.fridayrelease.com/celebrities/biography/mahesh-manjrekar/4668 http://www.india-forums.com/celebrity/267/mahesh-manjrekar. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Voceditenore (talk) 18:07, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: There seems to be disagreement over his date of birth.  A number of IPs have been changing it regularly for over a month without providing sources when prompted.  Having initially assumed good faith the persistence despite warnings appeared unconstructive.  Having searched more deeply this is the outcome:
13 May 1953:
* 
* 
16 Aug 1958:
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
I think it is likely that the proliferation of 1953 dates is due to Wikipedia, and I am unable to find anything reliable to support that date.  The news articles are more convincing for the 1958 date, in particular the Times of India which is well respected.
As such I will change the DOB on the basis of multiple reliable sources to 16 Aug 1958.  If anyone has access to a more reliable source, a biography perhaps, please add it or change accordingly.  |→ Spaully τ  08:43, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth - conflicting sources
Talk:Letsie III

message: How many other Letsie III's are there? User:ZyXoas 14:12, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hard to say. There are lots of kings in Africa, only a few of them rule territories that are also UN members. Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles) is ambivalent on the point, disclaiming its applicability outside of European rulers. Stan 15:37, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Of Lesotho" 

message: What Religion is the King? From his Schooling I assume RC, but is anyone sure? --Anthropax 22:11, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Roman Catholic?

message: This must be the shortest article on a sitting monarch of a sovereign state that we have in the English Wikipedia... It's no well over a stub length... Any reason for that? --Damián A. Fernández Beanato (talk) 10:55, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incredibly short article... 

message: Why does the infobox not show his first reign as King, 1990 to 1995? GoodDay (talk) 22:52, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reign
Talk:List of German popes

message: Pope Hadrian VI should not be classified as a German Pope, he was Dutch, born in Utrecht.
:Would anyone have an opinion about creating a List of non-Italian popes and then merge lists like this into it?--T. Anthony 06:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If there's any more interest I might work on it this weekend or next, depending on other commitments in life.--T. Anthony 10:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree that Hadrian VI should not be classified as German since he was born in Utrecht, now part of the Netherlands. It was never German. The Holy Roman Empire compassed the Kingdom of Germany, the Kingdom of Italy and the Kingdom of Burgundy; territories embracing present-day Germany (except Southern Schleswig), Austria (except Burgenland), Liechtenstein, Switzerland, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, the Czech Republic, Slovenia (except Prekmurje), as well as significant parts of modern France (mainly Artois, Alsace, Franche-Comté, Savoie and Lorraine), Italy (mainly Lombardy, Piedmont, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, and South Tyrol), and present-day Poland (mainly Silesia, Pomerania, and Neumark). In that retrospect Pope John Paull II would have been German as well. Pope Hadrian VI didn't speak German so I think it's safe to say he's not German--Jorgenpfhartogs (talk) 08:48, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/English Lit Bio Dict

message: I'll bet we already have all these. The red links seem to mostly be non-standard titles (e.g. with prefixes like "Mrs." or suffixes like "LLD"), with few exceptions. After pruning, I'd bet there are only one or two here we don't have already. – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 14:49, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Al-Tirmidhi

message: Are Jami at-Tirmidhi and Sunan al-Tirmidhi really different books? Any expert in this field? When where they writen? --Striver 14:51, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This question has been dealt with, and referenced on the Sunanpage. Supertouch (talk) 15:42, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Question regarding the ''Sunan''

message: Was at-Tirmidhi of Persian or Arab ancestry? I think Salahuddin Ali Abdul Mawjood's book, The Biography of Imām at-Tirmidhī, would help, but I don't have a copy.
He was known as "as-Sulami", indicating affiliation to the Arab tribe of Banu Sulaym, but this does not eliminate the possibility of his being Persian—al-Bukhari, for example, carried the nisbah "al-Ju`fi" because his great-grandfather accepted Islam at the hands of a person of the Ju`fi tribe. The fact that al-Bukhari was of Persian descent is evident in his great-great-grandfather's Persian name. However, at-Tirmidhi's great-great-grandfather had an Arabic name, so that doesn't help. I have not seen sources that state at-Tirmidhi was known as as-Sulami by way of wala'.
Sultan states that the six famous collectors of hadith were "all of Persian heritage from modern day Uzbekistan or Iran." () This supports at-Tirmidhi being of Persian descent, but I have not seen any other sources to support this.
Ar-Raqib and Roche identify him as "a medieval Persian collector of hadith." ()
Merriam-Webster/Britannica identifies him as an "Arab scholar." () ()
I think the most that can be said is that at-Tirmidhi was Persian in the sense that he was from Persia. He was born in Tirmidh, a city in Abbasid Persia, specifically in the province of Khurasan. According to a weaker opinion, however, he was born in Mecca. --Axiom292 (talk) 06:52, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Persian or Arab

message: ((The Cambridge History of Iran, Volume 4: From the Arab Invasion to the Saljuqs Writes)) (After this period commences the age of the authors of the six canonical
collections of Sunni hadith (al-sihdh al-sittd)y all of whom were Persian)
((Ar-Raqib, Akil; Roche, Edward M. (2009). Virtual Worlds Real Terrorism. p. 263.)) (writes he was a persian) 
((Sultan, Sohaib (2007). The Qur'an and Sayings of Prophet Muhammad: Selections Annotated and Explained. Woodstock, Vt: Skylight Paths Publishing)) (writes there were six collectors of hadith—all of Persian heritage from mod¬ ern day Uzbekistan or Iran) Mohammad Cowboy (talk) 07:32, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  failed verification per WP:VER :Revert vandalism 

message: I'm starting this section to give 93.22.38.147 the chance to explain their edit. M.Bitton (talk) 21:52, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 21:56, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  January 2022
Talk:Swanson

message: It should be noted that Campbell Soup still holds Swanson's broth products. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samuel Curtis (talk • contribs) 14:54, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Swanson Broths

message: Swanson Article is disorganized, I (b64) have edited the Page to look like this. Carlossuarez46 wants it to look like it does now. What does the group think?
Thanks
B64 (talk) 04:50, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Removal of references and interwiki links is never appropriate.  Edit warring without consensus is also not appropriate.  Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swanson Brands 
Talk:Coat of arms of Costa Rica

message: *Are not the "mountains" volcanoes?  --Daniel C. Boyer 14:56, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: no, they're not volcanoes.
represented in the coat of arms are:
*Cordillera Volcánica Central
*Cordillera Volcánica de Talamanca
*Cordillera Volcánica de Guanacaste
:As depicted on the currency, they definitely have smoke coming from the tops.  Fishal (talk) 06:10, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  not mountains 

message: I'm listing this as a start-class. If there'd been a C-class, it would have one - but it's closer to start than B at the moment. A few more references and perhaps integrate the images better to achieve B class.  The potential's definitely there. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 13:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, and a lead paragraph is required outlining the contents of the article and giving links to important pages straight off - eg. to Costa Rica itself, coat of arms, that sort of thing. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 13:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rerating 
Talk:Guru Angad

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  -- — CactusWriter | needles 06:42, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Copyedited and fixed many spelling mistakes, wrong capitals in mostly the first main section. Edited parts throughout. Added about 12/15 wikilinks and repaired 2/3 broken ones.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.34.39.97 (talk) 12:24, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Work Done
Talk:Coat of arms of the Republic of the Congo

message: Why don't we just have blazons of these coats of arms, rather than vague and incomplete "descriptions"?  --Daniel C. Boyer 15:02, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

message: On several coins issued by the People's Republic of Congo from 1991-1992 (KM#s 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12), there is a coat of arms (or a seal?) for which I have not found any information. Since these are coins, the colors are unknown. It appears to be a lion head with mane facing left surrounded by a decorative necklace of some kind that goes over the chief. The chief is has a horizontal chain broken up in the center by a vertical design of a plant perhaps? There is a motto which states: SANG DES HEROS SEMENCE DE LA REVOLUTION. Anyone have information of this briefly used coat of arms/seal? ElkandAcquerne (talk) 21:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not have any information of that CoA. SVG-image-maker (talk) 01:26, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Coat of Arms or Seal from 1991-1992
Template talk:Poland-rail-transport-stub

message: I decided to change an image in this stub template, as I wanted it to refer clearly to Polish rails. The image is of a PKP class SP45 locomotive, which can be found exclusively in Polish railways. CCMichalZ 15:03, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Way cool.  I like it.  Well done!  Slambo (Speak) 15:56, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Guru Arjan

message: Hello @Redtigerxyz, 'Guru' is indeed an honourifical term and usually these are removed from articles but according to WP:HONOURIFICS, "There are some exceptions: ... Where an honorific is so commonly attached to a name that the name is rarely found in English-language reliable sources without it, it should be included. For example, the honorific may be included for Mother Teresa." Arjan's name is presented with the term 'Guru' as a prefix in the vast majority of reliable sources and thus it is part of his common-name, so it is not necessary to remove the term 'Guru' from this article. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 17:19, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: MaplesyrupSushi, It is Common name, as such I am not suggesting to rename the article. Britannica uses "Guru Arjan" as well as "Arjan". Wikipedia's Guru Nanak calls him Nanak at many instances.--Redtigerxyz  Talk  16:33, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Redtigerxyz Okay, thank you for explaining. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 17:27, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Guru' as honourifics 

message: Guru arjan is incorrect name please fix it because his name is Guru Arjun dev. 2409:40E4:58:6068:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 17:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guru Arjun dev
Talk:Typhoon Bess (1982)

message: Intro, picture, impact, and more organization in general. Hurricanehink 15:12, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to get a picture on this week! Icelandic Hurricane #12 15:14, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't worry. I'm adding some more info as we speak. Hurricanehink 15:48, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: This page is all depending on one source. We need to add additional citations and reliable sources on this page. Jeffrey Gu (talk) 18:16, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — mw (talk) (contribs) 22:00, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Typhoon Bess (1982) →  – This Bess has been retired, and I think this warrants for a move to Typhoon Bess. 🍙🌀CycloneIns✉ 21:24, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

text: I disagree. An example would be Hurricane Arlene (1987). Despite this Arlene being notable, it is still referred with the date. 🎩Incognito Fedora🎩 (talk) 23:39, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Fletcher106 Uh no. You should read what I said again. I am saying that since this Bess is the one that got the name retired, the year should be removed. 🍙🌀CycloneIns✉ 19:45, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose, as said before, neither of these fulfill WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Fletcher106 (talk) 13:00, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 December 2023
Talk:HMAS Dechaineux

message: I added the history of the name Dechaineux in the 'Name' section, and put the 2005 Flooding incident in a seperate section, i will expand on that section later once i get some more info
I will add any other sections i think of, maybe something outlining exercises its been in, or maybe something explaining that bell they have on the conning tower--Nirvana- 15:13, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Main Article

message: I've added this same sidebar on all the Collins class sub articles, the info still needs to be verified though. I also added the image of Dechaineux with a dolphin swimming infront of it, anyone know where this shot was located? I'm assuming it was off WA--Nirvana- 15:13, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Side bar
Talk:Vampire's Kiss

message: You don't say? --201.241.228.242 (talk) 23:18, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Deir el-Medina

message: Deir el-Madinah Incorrect
Deir el-Medina Correct
This potentially proves the article difficult to find and perhaps misleading to someone researching this particular module in Ancient History.
: I think it shows the problems of tranliterating Arabic into English. Markh 18:26, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Since google book confirms Markh comments (massively) and nobody has objected I have asked an administrator to move the page to the new title -- it involves deleting an existing  page redirect that already has the new name. Taam (talk) 11:54, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Incorrectly Spelt 

message: I moved the historical text back and made the village life a subsection of that. The reason is that all the subsections are based on historical texts as they were written thousands of years ago. The village section is based partly on arcaelogy evidence so I put this first again. Also I noted that there has been a comment added saying they weren't slaves. This is often repeated and may be tecnicly true but it may also be a matter of semantics. They may have been virtual slaves controlled by cult activity and an unfair justice system. There is something to support this in Romer's book I may check it at a later date and add a little more to clarify this. Good day Zacherystaylor (talk) 16:44, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical text 

message: I removed the sentence "more advanced than some of the British and American wives studying them."
because I don't find it pertinent or even clear. --Dia^ (talk) 23:52, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Americans and British wives

message: Is Deir el-Medina part of the Theban necropolis? If so, why not add this information to the article? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 06:38, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Is it part of the [[Theban necropolis]]?

message: — Assignment last updated by Johnstoncl (talk) 18:15, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: 311_History of Ancient Egypt
Talk:The Rule of Four (book)

message: Is the spoiler tag really necessary ? I don't seen anythung unveiled
I agree with the guy before, I don't see the point of just writing a character summary if you're going to talk about an entire book, and if you're put a spoiler tag there, some people think that the plot (or at least part of) will be revealed, when none is.
:You do what many dream of, all their lives. Aranherunar 14:34, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:The world will not end tomorrow

message: some good points here - like we shouldnt start an article for every current fad -- Astrokey44|talk 15:30, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.--Shark Fin 101 16:07, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Very good. This contains good points against creating articles on upcoming albums with almost no information. -- Reaper  X 03:05, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Points 

message: I believe the late, great Charles Shultz said this: "Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia."--Whsitchy 02:24, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So what do we Australians do? --Sumthingweird (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to add this 

message: Well, it might. --Sumthingweird (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. At some point, the title will come true. MatchesMalone (talk) 01:54, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  You never know 

message: Even though I understand the point of this, shouldn't it be deleted on 12/20/12? ;P   jj137 (talk) 03:39, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ;-) And you said that so non-chalantly! --Sumthingweird (talk) 13:13, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uh... 

message: 66.244.5.20 (talk) 20:50, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  We'll see 

message: What if it DOES end?
maybe 5009?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheBendly (talk • contribs) 13:35, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Umm...