lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Day of the Fight

message: From WP:RfD:
* Day of the Fight → Stanley Kubrick -- seeing as the ONLY thing that links here is the Stanley Kubrick article and the unused template, the redirect is nonsenseWeebot 03:19, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Perpetual stub Since Kubrick's short films were so short, their individual articles will inevitably be stubs. They should be merged into Short films of Stanley Kubrick. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 07:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: According to Stanley Kubrick Interview with Jeremy Bernstein 1966, he sold it for a loss of about $100 less than it cost to make (about 16 minutes in).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.163.72.2 (talk) 00:32, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loss, not profit 

message: Does anyone have any information the copyright status of this film? It was published before 1964, and I can't find a copyright notice for it, which would make it public domain.
Assuming that it was published with a copyright notice, it would have needed to be renewed in 1978 to have remained in-copyright, but I can't find any evidence of a renewal.
Joshua Garner (talk) 00:31, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright status 
Talk:Extant taxon

message: What does it mean Basil
---
Is there a difference in meaning of expressions
"still existing" and "still in existence"?
*Extant means "still existing". 
*... can be applied to ... that are currently still in existence.
Is Wikipedia really a dictionary? -Wser 19:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Does anyone besides me feel like extant sounds more like "already existing" than "still existing"? I feel like I've heard it used a lot (and tend to use it myself) to mean the former, and was a little surprised to see the latter as the real definition. User:Glenn Willen (Talk) 15:22, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there really much that can be said about this subject? If it is just going to be a dictionary definition it doesn't qualify for an article. Richard001 06:52, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering the same thing myself. Kingdon 19:21, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

text: If we can have an artical about extinct species, why not about extant species?Flight Risk (talk) 19:32, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semantic drift 

message: This article is ridiculous, it ends up saying a whole lot without saying anything.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.202.89.125 (talk) 15:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Worse than that, it also adds a layer of confusion with the sentences: "However, extant refers primarily to a species that is extinct from a localized area. For instance, the Northern Rocky Mountain Wolf became extant, or rather, was extirpated from Yellowstone National Park, but was then reintroduced later." which seem to be completely wrong.  I think I will remove them. Huw Powell (talk) 15:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does it mean? 

message: The term extant is used in another wiki page, that on "equus".
(And I'm sure there are other pages.)
I did not know the meaning, clicked it, and wound up here.
The explanation in the article helped to understand the term.
As all species will die out or evolve into others at some point in time,
I have no problem with the "still existing/in existence" definition.
--88.159.247.141 (talk) 19:46, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: However, Wikipedia isn't a dictionary. Instead of linking people to this stub, it would be equally useful to hyperlink the user to Extant, which achieves the same thing, but in a better format, as well as ensuring that both Wikis stick to their own purpose. Rahrahboahb T 17:15, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article contains useful information
Talk:Anaheim Kingsmen Drum and Bugle Corps

message: We could use a lot more info on this page.  Anyone know any Kingsmen alumni?  I mean c'mon, these were our first champs.
: I added a Show Summary section... GWFrog (talk) 22:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add more? 

message: I've found and clipped a number of newspaper articles referencing this, so I believe it's likely notable. You can find anything I've clipped so far in my newspapers.com list here (look for clippings around the time of this comment). I want to move this article to Anaheim Kingsmen based on all of the sources I've seen so far using that title, but I wanted to give it a little while so anybody can object if they'd like to. Thanks!  ASUKITE 02:22, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Fife and drum corps

message: What is the time frame for the evolution of the Fife and Drum . . . could someone add links to Historical content? Stmullin (talk) 12:42, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Time frame

message: It seems that this article could be contained within the larger "Corps of Drums" page that is more international in scope. 
There are also inaccuracies regarding the British Army in this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by God Save Queen Elizabeth (talk • contribs) 18:19, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest this merges with Corps of Drums Page
Talk:Blue Devils Drum and Bugle Corps

message: Removed section about the Blue Devils being the "Oakland Raiders" of DCI. No definite source for such statement, and such statement can be regarded as blatant opinion of one individual, who feels that the Blue Devils are a disrespectful organization. While everyone is entitled to their own opinion of the corps, such opinions should not be used as facts on a website dedicated to being an encyclopedia. This page is meant to detail the facts and history of the organization, not as a bulletin board for slander.--GooberJoovies (talk) 22:40, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It isn't on the 5.1.  In fact, I don't remember amps being used at all during that recording.  On the championship performance (Inside BD 2007) it starts exactly at 2:44 and ends exactly at 2:55.  Turn up your bass...it's deep! Midnight Q (talk) 21:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In my experience, no one has ever called the Blue Devils "the Devs" or "BD". Should I remove the nicknames from the article? BassHero55 (Message me) 00:17, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Have heard them called "the Devs" on rare occasions, usually by people who are not close to the activity, not by hard-corps fans... On the other hand, I have heard them called "BD" many, many times for many years--- also "BDB" & "BDC" for the B & C corps... GWFrog (talk) 17:23, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the Devs" and "BD" nicknames 

message: Please explain the massive changes made to this page unilaterally and without any explanation here on the talk page.  I am informed that you are going around and doing this to all the Drum Corps pages very quietly.  What is the technical reason for eliminating years of input from users?  Are you a musician?  A disgruntled ex-drum corps vet?  Someone who does not understand music?  If you are doing this very quietly, you must understand the general implications as to the loss of this information to the music community.
Saltwolf (talk) 02:50, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drmies and "unencyclopedic" 

message: Both the B and C corps articles should be merged into this article, per the deletion discussion outcome for the C corps, and my suggestion for the B corps. Neither needs a stand-alone article, they are feeders for this outfit. Acroterion (talk) 03:47, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merges
Talk:Drum Corps International World Class Champions

message: I added some info to the top of the article, including the use of the word "juggernaut".  If you look it up, it's not the most flattering word to use.  It's a little over the top, granted, but is it not true when speaking of the Top 6 corps?  If anyone objects to its use, go ahead and change it.  I won't fight.
Lazytiger 15:43, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Juggernauts 

message: I took the 2006 logo from the DCI article and put it here.  It would be nice to get any logos that are available from other years as well.  I don't know when they started making yearly logos... well, they've always had patches.  Scans of patches?  Is that feasible?  We'd of course have to find people that have them! — Lazytiger 21:34, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  logos 

message: I put all of the information into a table. Personally, I think it looks nicer than the list format. Whitemage33 23:00, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table 

message: I'm psyched to potentially add a new team as the 2013 winner.  (We'll know in a few hours.) If that happens, I suggest changing the article to read something like, "In DCI's first 41 seasons leading up to the 2013 championships, only 8 teams had ever won...".  That will preserve most of the sense of the existing opening paragraphs. Other thoughts? C. Scott Ananian (talk) 02:49, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update with 2013 results
Talk:Karl Lehenbauer

message: cool to see him finally get a wikipedia article, over 35k hits on google with some dating back to internet posts in the 1980s.—63.149.157.211 18:58, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Truly a great pioneer 
Talk:Phantom Regiment Drum and Bugle Corps

message: someone really needs to make it into an organized table. thank you! Dachshund2k3 14:18, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Show/Score table 

message: The uniform box states that they have sky blue baldric and gauntlets. Not denying this, but I was under the impression that this change was only for this season as it goes with their show?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.66.181.245 (talk) 02:14, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uniform 

message: "One question that has never been answered is, if the first DCI World Championships had been held much further away than the one hour drive to Whitewater, Wisconsin, would the Regiment have attended?" and 
"Phantom Regiment legend also holds that 1971 was also the season that the corps showed its determination to survive when, on a Friday the 13th, all the of the corps' buses ran out of fuel; the equipment truck caught fire, not just once, but twice; yet the corps went out and won that night's contest."Irish Melkite (talk) 02:06, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unencyclopedic 

message: I have now caught Drmies deleting decades of research regarding the detailed show discographies for the following drum and bugle corps:  Blue Devils, Santa Clara Vanguard, Phantom Regiment and Colts.  This information is well sourced, and has been collected for decades.  It is a rare and important source of musical collaboration and composition.  These edits, which are made without explanation other than Drmies finds them "unencyclopedic", are starting to border on vandalism.  I will be watching them and also alerting the drum and bugle corps community to follow them as well.  Further revisions without explanation or discussion on these talk pages will be considered vandalism and reported as such. 
Saltwolf (talk) 04:42, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Further assumption of bad faith may be considered disruptive. You may wish to start a Fandom site for this kind of extremely detailed content, it appears to be excessive here. Stop with the "vandalism" business. Acroterion (talk) 12:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drmies and disruptive editing on Drum Corps pages
Talk:The Cadets Drum and Bugle Corps

message: I added Les Misérables to the show concepts area. Faramirtook 02:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Huzzah. Ëvilphoenix Burn! 02:06, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The Cadets are now referring to themselves as The Holy Name Cadets once again.  This page should reflect that. 69.69.218.97 (talk) 06:00, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Are they? The YEA page just calls them "The Cadets"; the 75th anniversary logo used at www.theholynamecadets.org has "Holy Name", "Garfield", and "Bergen County" in the logo. —C.Fred (talk) 14:25, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

text: The move to Holy Name was only for their 75th anniversary season...a one-time shot.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.32.147.34 (talk) 00:38, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holy Name once more 

message: The YEA page  is now referring to them as "Holy Name" again. This page may be due for a move. Should it be moved to Holy Name Cadets Drum and Bugle Corps? —C.Fred (talk) 16:27, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure if they're permanently changed to Holy Name Cadets or if it's a one-year deal for their 75th anniversary. -Phi*n!x 17:59, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move?
Talk:United States Marine Drum and Bugle Corps

message: This article is just a copy/paste of a PAO statement as found on the Drum Corps website.  Who's maintaining this?  It'd be more interesting to get someone like Hook ( Is he still alive? ) to come up with a real history and lots of details about the D&B.  
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrpai (talk • contribs) 04:14 UTC, October 31, 2005
I don't know what a PAO statement is, but this article has undergone several revisions and in my opinion is a good history of the corps.  
The changes made on 7 Aug 2007 removed signifcant good material about the corps including information about Truman Crawford.  That material definitely belongs in this article.  I'm sure that Hook, who is definitely still alive, would agree.
{{Mapetty 12:59, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  PAO
Talk:Winter Guard International

message: This article would likely be best served by being broken up. The main article would be about WGI, who it is, and what it does. One section would be "See also" with links to separate articles on the WGI Color Guard, WGI Indoor Percussion and WGI Winds activities, As it is, it's just toooooooooo danged long. GWFrog (talk) 22:29, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Way BIG
Talk:Mies, Switzerland

message: Dhartung, I have reversed your changes which were far more than a style improvement.  It was a complete hatchet job.  Vast swathes of facts and useful information have been removed by you in the name of "style improvement".  Maybe some of your changes are cosmetically better and some discussion can take place on whether all the facts are necessary, but you went too far with the scissors.  By all means improve the layout, re-arrange the paragraphs, but remove facts requires careful thought and wholesale cutting like you did is getting close to vandalism.  Discuss mit here if you like, I will check back.
Trickyt 19:16, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Dhartung's edits were entirely appropriate, and certainly not vandalism.  Trickyt's version was full of unacceptable non-NPOV language, tourist and travel information that might belong in Wikitravel but doesn't belong in Wikipedia, and a bunch of general info (school trivia etc.) that again doesn't belong. I've restored Dhartung's version. -- Finlay Mcwalter | Talk 18:09, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Last Island (Louisiana)

message: "The highest points were under 5 ft (1.5 m) of water."
This makes no sense.   Does it mean that, during the actual storm,  the water was 5 feet deep over the island ?    Does it mean,  after the storm,   that all of the former island was completely submerged ?   There are five large fragments of this island.  Were these present after the storm,   or was the island total destroyed and these fragments re-emerged years later ?Eregli bob (talk) 03:44, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  underwater 

message: The wording in the article seems to suggest that Wine Island is one of five islands into which Last Island has fragmented as a result of the 1856 Last Island hurricane and later storms. That statement is directly based on this source. The maps accompanying the article are at odds with this claim, though: the 1853 map clearly shows "Vine Island" as separate from Last Island, pretty much in the place where the present-day map shows "Wine Island". It seems conceivable that what became Wine/Vine Island was at an earlier time also part of Last Island and at some point in time got separated from it in a storm, quite likely a hurricane, but this must already have been prior to 1853. That would mean that only East, Trinity, Whiskey and Raccoon Islands are the successor islands of what was Last Island/Isle Dernière immediately prior to the 1856 Last Island hurricane. -- Svenman (talk) 21:04, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory information regarding Last Island, Wine/Vine Island and the Last Island hurricane
Talk:Flying Padre

message: From WP:RfD:
* Flying Padre → Stanley Kubrick -- seeing as the ONLY thing that links here is the Stanley Kubrick article and the unused template, the redirect is nonsenseWeebot 03:19, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nothing to Lose (1997 film)

message: According to the Washington Post Lawrence was having difficulties during filming.
If there was an existing Production section I would add it there, but I don't think it should be added on it's own without the context of other Production and behind the scenes information. -- 109.79.77.239 (talk) 20:38, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Behind the scenes
Talk:Avril Lavigne: My World

message: This article was merged with and redirected to Use Your Illusion II as a result of an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 19:46, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate
Talk:Pali, Rajasthan

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 07:42, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition
Talk:Project FUBELT

message: The last sentence of this article says "This subsequently led to the Chilean coup d'état of 1973, and the death of Salvador Allende." This seems speculative, however.
I don't know much about the details of Project FUBELT itself, but according to the article on Salvador Allende, FUBELT dealt mostly with trying to prevent Allende's presidency before his ratification by Congress in 1970. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.51.176.92 (talk • contribs) 15 September 2005
::I have removed the part about the coup and Allendes death. --Ezeu 00:14, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 16 September 2005

message: It seems to me that this article lacks much context on the impacts of Project FUBELT itself. Undoubtedly there were consequences of the project, as well as context surrounding US motives and Allende's actual involvement in accusations by the US. I think it is imperative to include information about the different demographics in Chile as well, and tying it into US involvement and how the impacts of Project FUBELT may have impacted different people differently. Context of the events leading to, events after, and people affected by Project FUBELT are what this article needs to become less American-centric. Much of the sources cited in this article are just CIA documents, which while effective in proving the US POV, also lacks so much in (forgive me for saying this once again) context. Skillebrew25 (talk) 21:57, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you. But who is going to do that? You? I wish you good luck in the enterprise. I will be watching with interest, as I always do, and I am willing to help as time allows... Again, good luck. Regards, warshy (¥¥) 22:15, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding contextual information to the article 

message: What does the FUBELT mean? --KnightMove (talk) 08:08, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does it mean?
Talk:Lance Johnson

message: There was a passage on this page which mentioned that Johnson was one of few players to hit twenty or more triples since integration, which is true, but has nothing to do with anything, really-the decline in triples had already begun after the deadball era, for a number of reasons. To inject the colour line into this is foolishness. Hushpuckena (talk) 22:40, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triples and integration
Talk:Catweazle

message: Okay, I give up... Why is this article a stub ? It looks fine to me ( or it will do, once I've fixed one tiny typo ).  WMMartin 20:11, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stubbiness ?? 

message: The link to the Geofrey Bayldon interview doesn't work
IceDragon64 (talk) 20:13, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interview Link 

message: I would like to add two important links for "Catweazle":
www.catweazle-fan.de/index_e.htm
CATWEAZLE Fanpage (in English and German)
and
www.catweazlefanclub.co.uk
The official Catweazle Fan Club
CatweazleFan (talk) 17:23, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  add external links 

message: All my life I have wondered why it wasn't rerun on British TV.  I never did find out- it should be, it was a well-loved series.  If anyone finds that one out, can they put the info here.
IceDragon64 (talk) 19:44, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rerun 

message: how can a Fanclub be a official Website? I love Catweazle (and bought it on DVD) but a Fanclubsite is the official Site of the Fanclub - not from Catweazle -- Hartmann Schedel cheers 23:37, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official Website 

message: I remember seeing this in the early 80's so it was definitely rerun. I wasn't born when it was first shown.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.182.58.120 (talk) 16:59, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rerun 

message: Was this a comedy, a children's series, a parody of a children's series, a serious attempt a time-travel science-fantasy, or what?  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  06:05, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs further classification, infobox details 
Talk:History of the Cayman Islands

message: I removed the quote "Only the people on the Island will ever really know what it looked like right after the storms, and most to this late date refuse to speak of it." Not only will they speak of it...often...but you can buy one of sveral coffee table type books with pictures of the devistation (proceeds going to recovery of course)Ace-o-aces 20:23, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The main article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayman_Islands claims that the name of the islands comes from a person named Cayman Cushing. There is no mention of this here. Isn't it more likely that the name came from the subspecies of alligator called the caiman, pronounced the same way and common to the area?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psyden (talk • contribs) 12:16, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Origin
Talk:Human dartboard

message: The result of this AfD discussion was keep.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   16:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human Dartboard]] 
Talk:Ironworks

message: This article is intended to be little more than a disambiguation page.  I have just reverted a well-meaning attempt to expand the description of puddling, which listed Henry Cort as a kind of ironworks!  If you disagree, with my policy (as the creator of most of the present content, please give your reasons here, before amending the article.  Peterkingiron 23:22, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope of article 

message: Now that Siderurgy redirects here I think that there should be a note in the article explaining what siderurgy is (and thus why it redirects here). --Wizard191 (talk) 13:12, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think what you mean is that Siderugy should have bene merged here.  I have now done that.  Peterkingiron (talk) 23:05, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! --Wizard191 (talk) 23:49, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Siderurgy 

message: Does this picture really belong here? Wizard191 (talk) 18:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: linked this article to the German article on the steel industry ??????????????????????? Maelli (talk) 16:48, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who the hell ..... 

message: Where is it?  good gosh. --Wikipietime (talk) 13:37, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cornell