lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Think of the children

message: The Background section of this page doesn't provide a meaningful background to the phrase "think of the children." It provides a rough outline of the background behind children's rights. However, these two things are not at all connected. The phrase "think of the children" is rooted in the belief that adults have certain duties towards children. This argument emerged as the rationale as to why children are not entitled to rights, and is seen in the work of John Locke and John Stuart Mill. Children's rights discourse seeks to push back against this rhetoric and assert that children ought to have rights, rather than assume their guardians will act on behalf of them according to their best interests. Moreover, as Lee Edelman and Lauren Berlant noted, when people use the phrase "think of the children," they are using children as a scapegoat for conservative political causes that have little to do with the lives of children themselves -- which children's rights similarly is a response to. For these reasons, I am removing the background section. JapanOfGreenGables (talk) 10:54, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing "background" section

message: Clearly the first chapter lacks any foundation in truth, is not truth bearing and simply an "appeal to emotion".  The first paragraph claims: "In debate, however, it is a plea for pity that is used as an appeal to emotion, and therefore it becomes a logical fallacy" but disregards that most rational debaters that mention the legitimate concerns re the rights of children, are not "appealing to emotion" at all but expressing facts that just happen to induce emotions as we see the negative state of children.
Wikipedia tends to have a very right-wing, ultra conservative, racist, sexist spin in articles regarding such. Maybe it's the owner's right-wing ideology that drives the site.
--2604:2000:DDC0:DF00:8D84:B105:5E76:F813 (talk) 05:04, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: First paragraph is total propaganda

message: This article had a 2nd GA Review and was successfully promoted to GA quality status. Review may be seen at: Talk:Think of the children/GA2. — Cirt (talk) 22:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Promoted to GA quality status

message: At the very end of chapter 37 in The Awakening by Kate Choplin, Adéle tells Edna "Think of the children, Edna. Oh think of the children! Remember them!"
Lukewtollefson (talk) 04:09, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phrased used in 1899 novel ''The Awakening'' by Kate Choplin, potential etymological origin 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Corrupt children. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 18:49, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Corrupt children" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: More than half of the references in this article have no outside links going to lengths to have the reference just be 'Reagan 2005' or other names and a year. These are not references. Parelance (talk) 14:31, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  References are incomplete
Talk:Stiltskin

message: User:TessaSturridge changed the text 
:They produced only one album, The Mind's Eye, and never made significant inroads into the US music scene
to
:They produced only one album, The Mind's Eye, and  made significant inroads into the US music scene.
Which of the two is it now? 
If TesaSturridge is wrong about the US, then the other changes in this edit are also doubtful. 
--Aleph4 15:29, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Significant inroads?

message: Having read the Calling All Stations article, despite having never heard the album, I think it seems unfair to call it 'disastrous' in this article. --81.105.251.160 18:23, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calling all stations 

message: It would be fair to assume that the name is derived from the fairytale character Rumpelstiltskin, however I can find no evidence to support this. Anyone? Jameboy 23:44, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of band name 

message: I know Finnigan and he would tell you that everything on this article is rubbish. He says he wrote inside and Wilson was just an arsehole who took all the credit.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.203.56.212 (talk) 11:37, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The truth?
Talk:In-circuit emulation

message: New to wiki : dont know how to fix the heading, the terms ICE, OCD and BDM have been used interchangeably the article altogether is confusing, don't have time to actually take care of the article have a look at this http://www.embedded.com/story/OEG20030205S0032 one might paste in text from there. 
IN short
ICE=emulator == no processor == no Chip
OCD ==Debug support on the Chip the processor is still there much cheaper 
BDM is a type of OCD...
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Amritanshujohri (talk • contribs) 15:37, 28 December 2005
:There seems to be a general confusion regarding the usage of all these terms. I have added a couple of external links that might help a confused reader. Hope some expert hands will edit this article to make it more useful.
:- sooraj
::There are different between ICE and ICD/OCD. ICE is a kind of extra version of chip to plug into original chip socket for debugging purpose. for example, in microprocessor system, ICE will replace the central microprocessor for testing and development. Whereas ICD is built-in every single chip which provide debugging funcations. that's why normally ICE is very expensive because ICE actually contains actual CPU with extra circuits. So I believe there should be seperate ICD and ICE items --Lielei 23:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definitions 

message: Need to review the page's reference for bias and applicability, as this seems to be a personal website.  There are undoubtedly better references for the topic of this link.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.100.76.154 (talk) 04:50, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: If in-circuit emulator is a misnomer for the entity it is refering to, what is a better name for this entity? In-circuit debugger is imho also not correct, as the entity is usually capable of doing more than just debugging. Besides original research, maybe literature already uses better names? --Abdull (talk) 17:33, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better name 

message: First paragraph mentions "bond-out processor" - this has no meaning for someone not familiar with this topic.  Would appreciate a better entry into the article.  Thanks.  Todd (talk) 05:42, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bond-Out Processor?
Talk:Guitar (Frank Zappa album)

message: The "trivia" regarding "Sexual Harassment in the Workplace" needs a citation. I have never, ever heard this before.
I would love to know the complete list of which songs these solos are extracted from.  I know there are at least two solos from Drowning Witch, two from Black Page #2, and one from Andy, as well as the ones cited on the main page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.6.235.56 (talk) 03:14, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Orange Bowl

message: Compared the following advice, inserted into the article by 69.162.168.122, to the official game results:
:The 1979 bowl game was Oklahoma v. Nebraska, Not Oklahoma v. Florida State...     
:The 1980 bowl game was Oklahoma v. Florida State, Not Oklahoma v. Miami...
:The 1981 bowl game was Oklahoma v. Florida State, Not Oklahoma v. Miami
The 1979, 1980 and 1981 game results were indeed listed wrong in the article and have been corrected. jareha 15:41, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrections

message: :Should include something about the Orange Bowl Parade (which was shut down in 2002) see: this link
:Should also include information about the Orange Bowl Committee and the various activities they are responsible for (the game being one of them)
Orange Bowl originally started in 1933 and was known as Palm Festival. The first game was played on January 2, 1933 featuring manhattan College and University of Miami. Miami won 7 - 0  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.138.229.133 (talk) 16:15, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing

message: How was the Big Eight Conference a tie in when it was dissolved after the 1995 season? NThomas (talk) 19:46, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tie ins 

message: A recent history of the Orange Bowl needs to be written to reflect the fairly recent demolition of the Orange Bowl and the construction of the Miami Ballpark on the same plot of land. -- ℐℴℯℓ ℳ. ℂℌAT ✐ 16:28, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent History 
Talk:List of school districts in New Jersey

message: Well, here we are almost 2 years later, and I had forgotten about the discussion above.  What happened today was, I saw this article on my watch list, took a look through it, and noticed the Millstone Borough School District as a red link.  This is a non-operating school district (as the Millstone, New Jersey article correctly states.)  I also noticed that the intro to this article says that non-operating school districts are not listed at all.  I am not sure I agree with this.  Having read the suggestion I made almost 2 years ago, which is that the non-operating districts might link to the municipality article, I find that this is what I still think.  :)  Therefore, rather than delete Millstone, I have linked it to the municipality article and left "School District" in non-linked type, with a notation "Non-operating district."  I realize that this creates other issues, like what to do about the other non-operating districts that have been deleted.  (The other Somerset County example would be Rocky Hill.)  My suggestion is that if someone wants to add it back, they can do so.  I also notice that there is still a red-link for the one-school (K-8 or maybe K-6) district of South Bound Brook, which I am going to link to the municipality article.  Neutron 18:47, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-operating school districts
Talk:University of Virginia's College at Wise

message: As a result of recent activity with the this article, the history was split in two; I've now merged the histories back together, and all edits are within the history of this article.  I haven't performed the move that was requested to The University of Virginia's College at Wise, however, because that seems inconsistent with our article University of Virginia, and because there was no discussion on this talk page.  Please provide rationale here and list at Wikipedia:Requested moves.  Thank you. Chick Bowen 16:15, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent moves 

message: Is it just as difficult to get to UVA Wise as it is UVA itself?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sabinal (talk • contribs) 14:25, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acceptance rate at UVA Wise 

message: On the athletics section, it still says that UVA-Wise competes in the NAIA's Mid South Conference, when as of 2013-14 they compete in NCAA Division II's Mountain East Conference. Also, I am not sure that both the G-MAC and Mid-South Conference navigation boxes (the boxes on the bottom of the page) are necessary any more since the college is now in the Mountain East Conference.Cgriff94 (talk) 18:55, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Athletics section needs changing. 

message: I'm having difficulty deciding which enrollment number I should put in the infobox. Should I put in the enrollment number that SCHEV has, which is what is currently on the infobox, or should I put in the UVA-Wise presentation enrollment number, which was what used to be on the infobox? The two numbers are inconsistent with each other and I am asking for input on whether it should be kept as the SCHEV number or it should be changed to the UVA-Wise presentation number.
Here is the presentation that I am referring to: http://www.virginia.edu/bov/meetings/'16%20SEP/UVa-Wise%202016%2009%2016%20FINAL.pdf
And here is the SCHEV report that I am also referring to: http://research.schev.edu/enrollment/E2_Report.asp
RedCavalier94 (talk) 21:28, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fall 2016 Enrollment Numbers: SCHEV or UVA-Wise presentation?
Talk:Take Them On, On Your Own

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 17:22, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''

message: Apparently if you play the copy controlled version in a CD player the first track is extended. But if you rip the cd, it starts differently. Can anyone confirm? phocks (talk) 10:06, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy Control
Talk:The Wynona Riders

message: Text is copied from , which says its source is "Wynona Riders Biography", a broken link (or maybe I can't access it because I'm at work right now; firewall issues). --Fang Aili 15:52, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible copyright violation

message: What would be a reliable source for a page such as this? I was in the band, but some would argue that makes me an UNRELIABLE source!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.42.93.64 (talk) 23:14, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing? 

message: hah hah. Sheer poetry. I like the repetition, but now I think one of my friends did this. Jack Cheeze was the only one that I know publicly said he did not get along with me, so I don't know how the other's statements could be sourced. I don't know how the syntax could be resolved, nevermind the truth of the matter, which, again, I would probably be considered an unreliable source. ;)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.42.93.64 (talk) 21:13, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Not get along"...  

message: In the liner from the album J.D. SALINGER there is a section title 'Why Nona?' in here it is stated that the band chose the name with Wynona being a reference to a celtic word meaning first born and riders as a variation on the old english word ridden which means to clear the way. It is also said that they chose the name without knowing the actress of the same name.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kilboyzc (talk • contribs) 16:11, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name selection
Talk:Hurricane Francelia

message: Intro needs work, and the impact section needs to mention some country names. Jdorje 07:54, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: This is the only Hurricane Francelia there ever was, and the name is not on any name lists. Therefore, the article needs to go back to the original name (without the year identifier). --Coredesat (talk) 01:13, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Talk:Weymouth F.C.

message: Have greatly re-written the page, added club puffbox etc. Would appreciate another member to second-check for factual accuracy etc Duckorange 16:01, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

message: There's been ongoing edit warring on this article for months, and that's just not acceptable. Please note that "this is the way we've always done it here" is not justification for a specific style; on the other hand, simply asserting that removal of the reserve squad is correct is not enough, either. So, what are the arguments for/against inclusion on the reserve squad, and on the order of the players?  I'm going to ask members from WikiProject Football to comment; if there is a general consensus across other FC articles, then we need to follow that here, per WP:CONLIMITED. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:31, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full protection 
Talk:Miniature sheet

message: I just cleaned up this article for grammar, spelling and redundancies.  As I was doing so, I noticed that it never tells us what a "miniature sheet" is.  A good definition of the term is needed for this article.  As written, it's a good afd candidate.  -- MisterHand 16:10, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is it? 

message: The more common philatelic term is "souvenir sheet".  Note that the article uses the term "souvenir sheet" repeatedly rather than "miniature sheet".  Also, some souvenir sheets are as large as a full (say 25+ stamp) sheet but only have a few stamps and a lot of illustrated border.  This article should definately be renamed "souvenir sheet."  House of Scandal 23:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Either term would be fine with me. Interestingly, the Papua New Guinea post makes an official distinction; see . Stan 15:37, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename
Talk:Banner of the Stars

message: Added release information found on animenfo and animenewsnetwork. Currently trying to find a freely available image for article. Devine 15:35, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Release information

message: Added image from Banner of the Stars III, low resolution, found in multiple locations. Should fall under fair use. Devine 15:52, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Ok, the use of the Baronh names is ridiculous. In the anime the characters are referred to as Lafiel and Jinto, not the crazy un pronounceable spelling —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.50.51.126 (talk) 05:38, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Been five months since the original post, and I'll third this - go ahead and start changing things back to the names every official translation has used. Doceirias 09:10, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm not sure anyone ever bothered to change it. According to the manual of style, we have to use the official English names, not the Baronh spellings. I don't think there's any active editors on this page who have the resources or time to go correct things, though. Doceirias (talk) 08:49, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it's fine to list both, with deference given to the English name. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 05:25, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are you using the Baronh names? 

message: Some major cleanup is needed on this article as of June 11th, 2010.  The entire article is incredibly informal and reads more like a review or blog entry than an encyclopedia article.  KiTA (talk) 02:08, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Cleanup Needed 
Talk:Adamson Estate

message: Can you say why this is important and provide a reference? Otherwise this should be merged and redirected into Mississauga, Ontario. Thanks. - Taxman Talk 16:25, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance?
Talk:Agiel

message: Not so sure that the hebrew name is correct, as i do not speak/read Hebrew.  Mriswith 16:31, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

message: French interwiki points to the wrong article. --Kays666 (talk) 12:47, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interwiki
Talk:Junior (1994 film)

message: If you consider kindergarden cop, wouldn't this be arnold's third, not second comedy, like the article says?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.112.128.230 (talk • contribs) 16:34, 28 December 2005‎ (UTC)
it actually looks suprisingly like a rip off of a comic series called als baby  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.20.33.121 (talk) 14:57, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: you should check better the informations about this being the second movie about male pregnancy. i have no sure data at the moment but tognazzi and buzzanca were the protagonists of similar histories in the '70, in italy. --joana 16:00, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  international cinematography 

message: Who what where when... at least put a citation here, please.
- 75.16.72.187 (talk) 21:33, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Based on true events" 

message: See page below:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_awards_and_nominations_received_by_Arnold_Schwarzenegger
68.54.101.143 (talk) 22:30, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arnold Schwarzenegger was nominated for a Golden Globe for his performance in Junior 

message: Can someone who has seen this movie rewrite it to be intelligible, please?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.249.250.252 (talk) 03:33, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The writing in the plot summary is atrocious
Talk:Doujin soft

message: Should this page link to DLSite? AmethystPhoenix 13:45, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It was written in the article that doujinsoft means fangame. That is wrong because there are several original doujin games that are original, such as the games from the Touhou series. I would call doujin soft indie games, including fangames.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.2.53.63 (talk) 11:07, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Meanin of doujin

message: I recommend that Dojin game be merged into Dojin soft.  The latter term has been around longer and already has a category :Category:Dojin soft.  Granted, "Dojin game" is probably more familiar (and less confusing) to English speakers than "soft(ware)", but that's my two cents on the issue.--Mitsukai 16:37, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Article merger

message: I have read this article many a time, and the section mentioning the rivaling of commercial software sounds biased. Am I just crazy, or what? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.204.83.132 (talk) 03:21, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased 

message: I always though it a bit strange that in English the term has just stayed as dōjin soft rather than dōjin software. Any thoughts on it (besides the obvious "because that's how it is in Japanese"?) Might be worth including in the article.私の旅 (talk) 13:02, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Is "Anime" weird because it meant animation? --Ahyangyi (talk) 02:07, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really as when someone says "anime" people can associate the word with the meaning (it is, after all, now in the English dictionary). However if someone were to say "I bought some soft", the common response would probably be "soft what?". That being said, "doujin soft" as a phrase probably does retain meaning amongst those who play them, so I guess it can work that way also. Watashinotabi (talk) 00:19, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soft(ware) 

message: So far I found no doujin soft for mobile platforms such as Android. No doujin soft for mobile platforms? Why? Do doujins—their creator—have relatively low budget?滅Muhammadrizkya滅 20:58, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Doujin Soft 