lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of England ODI cricketers

message: I never realised that Bell had been not out over a thousand times for England.............funny that, I never thought he'd actually even played a tenth of that amount of ODI matches. It's almost as if someone's having a joke.........
Also, Bell has 88 maidens to his name when it shows that he has not yet bowled a single delivery. mmmmmmm............. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by AllynJ (talk • contribs) 20:21, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ian Bell

message: Hi folks
Great page which I use a lot.
After the last ODI you have Chris Jordan's runs incorrect - he now has 169 in ODIs
keep up the good work
Three Lion Whip  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.135.233.61 (talk) 07:20, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed Ytfc23 (talk) 09:01, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chris Jordan 
Talk:Jerusalem (Out of Darkness Comes Light)

message: Have just moved the page to exclude the word "the" in the title and have cleaned up. Everything should be okay, just posting this as an easy-access record. Thanks. Ready (talk~~contributions) 09:46, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Moved 

message: Would anyone consider this song Zionist? I think it is, actually. TomUSA 20:43, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zionist 
Talk:Miguel Ángel Martínez-González

message: This article was created by a co-author of Prof. Martinez Gonzalez, perhaps a student of his? (see Bes-Rastrollo M, Pérez Valdivieso JR, Sánchez-Villegas A, Alonso A, Martínez-González MA. Validación del peso e índice de masa corporal auto-declarados de los participantes de una cohorte de graduados universitarios. Rev Esp Obes 2005; (in press)).  This seems to violate WP:COI. --Macrakis 18:37, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough.  The only issue, I guess, is Wikipedia:Notability (academics) -- note the stress on independent sources. --Macrakis 22:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Primary sources please.  Richard Pinch (talk) 06:38, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

text: I would suggest removing this page at all. This research does not reach the standards for a page on an encyclopedia, there is nothing notable nor a particularly high achievement such as Nobel or anything even comparable.. 109.231.193.22 (talk) 10:33, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Created by co-author

message: Reading the achievements and other information added in this page, I believe that this researcher is below the standards regarding notability, as his achievements are average considering decades of university of career, and they are similar to many other thousands professors in Europe and Spain. 
I suggest removing this page from Wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.141.62.149 (talk) 13:48, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Below 'notability' standards
Talk:Harry Bennett

message: The phrasing "where he hunted and hid from his enemies" seems kind of POV. How does anyone know he was hiding? Maybe he was just hunting? Seems like someone is reading a lot into that. JettaMann 18:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Phrasing

message: I'd remove this.  Surely this type of characterization is needless POV and adds nothing to the content of the encyclopedia. DivisionByZer0 (talk) 09:07, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Bennet was an interesting guy"

message: I personally saw the concrete log cabin near Ypsilanti. The 1975 property owner told me about the rumored tunnel.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jfhollowell (talk • contribs) 16:09, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but what you saw and what someone told you about a rumor cannot be included in a WP article.  It fails WP:RS because it is not "based on reliable, published sources" and it fails WP:OR because "Wikipedia does not publish original research. The term "original research" refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and stories—not already published by reliable sources"  ClamDip (talk) 16:53, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation needed

message: What of this guy's later life during the 34 years after he was fired by Henry Ford II?  Did he find work, retain his Ford career wealth or did he descend into penury?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.29.79.73 (talk) 18:29, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Later Life?

message: Is it just me? or does that section seem like a descriptive of part of the 1987 movie Ford, the man and the machine. GoodDay (talk) 09:21, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Backround section
Talk:Joseph P. Moran

message: Just a heads up, I took down the "this article only uses one source" tag since I went and tracked down a bunch of other ones.  Ford MF 18:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of sources

message: If the above dates are correct, Moran died at the age of 29, which seems unlikely. According to this source he was 39 in 1934, the year is presumed to have died . The mug shot here shows a man with receding hair, greying at the side. This suggests he was most likely born in 1895, not 1905. Paul B (talk) 09:34, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: 1905-1934
Talk:Bethel, Delaware

message: I'm impressed.  For a town with only 184 residents, there are an awful lot of people trying to add detailed (but really inaccurate) info about the town on Wikipedia. :) White 720 18:39, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Billboard Mainstream Rock number-one songs of the 1980s

message: You know, rather than just a plain list, maybe a listing of the #1 song for each week.  It might look better as well, and while we're at it, maybe create a category for #1 Mainstream Rock hits? Maplejet 18:40, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would support this idea, although someone would need to research each chart for instances of songs dropping then returning to #1. - eo 22:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I second that and recently I did a box who list the number-one songs of the Mainstream Rock Tracks chart for it --Sd-100 (talk) 15:47, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we transform the list into something similar to the modern rock tracks list? 

message: It messes up the formatting of the article.  Either they should all be in tables or all lists.  The way it is now makes the article looks disjointed. - eo 22:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is 2007 in a table?

message: What meaningful or relevant information is to be derived from this table?  It seems pointless and, in itself, doesn't represent any useful measure of chart performance.  I propose deleting this section.  Even if a count of #1 songs by year is desired, couldn't this be accomplished by simply changing the yearly list of songs to an ordered list? Piriczki (talk) 21:46, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Frequency of number ones

message: In 1984, "Oh Sherrie" is shown to be a #1 for two weeks, but I can't find a valid reference for this.  Here is the artist chart for Steve Perry at Billboard, it only shows "Oh Sherrie" on the Hot 100 not the MRT chart.  Anybody? --Sc straker (talk) 00:42, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concerned about accuracy - Oh Sherrie 

message: Theirs now way to prove that any of the songs hit number on or not none of this is verifiable,
 and without resources all this means nothing.Feedmyeyes (talk) 19:52, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart reliability  

message: if any one has an account on billboard biz it would be much aprecated if you can go thought all the number one singles and see if they are all accurateFeedmyeyes (talk) 01:55, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Billboard.biz
Talk:Franklin D. Roosevelt Jr.

message: Fixed the broken link to FDR's "Stab In The Back” Speech in the body of this article, but would suggest editing so as to move the external link to a list of relevant reference links at the bottome of the page. With out objection I might go ahead and do that one of these days.  200.168.58.68 21:42, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fixed

message: Not as such, born in 1914. There was no Canadian citizenship until 1947. He would have been entitled to British subject-hood. 60.228.73.83 (talk) 08:20, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "This made Roosevelt entitled to Canadian citizenship" 

message: My grandfather served on this ship.  As I understand it, 2 men from each state (48 at that time?) were selected to serve under FDRJR.  They were under orders to protect the identity of their captain, though I do not know to what extent.  The ship is already in the wiki: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Ulvert_M._Moore_%28DE-442%29
Sadly I know little more, though I was allowed to attend a couple of their annual "ships meetings" (which persisted until at least the mid 1990s) of the crew, and met some of the sailors.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.254.83.252 (talk) 20:16, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "DE ship cross reference" 

message: Can we have this article title changed to Franklin D. Roosevelt Jr., to match his father (FDR) & son (FDR III)? GoodDay (talk) 19:09, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've filed a request here (and somehow forgot his suffix when doing so). SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 19:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change title 

message: Not sure if this List of People exists but it should.  80edam (talk) 07:43, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be on a list of people who died on their birthdays.
Talk:Kalocsa

message: From the article since it doesn't belong there. – Alensha talk 18:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The intro says the archbishopric was founded in 1135, but the article refers to archbishop Asztrik in the 11th century. This needs to be clarified.Hollomis (talk) 01:56, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foundation of the Archbishopric
Talk:The New Breed (ECW)

message: Well since it has been suggested, might as well talk about it.  I don't think we should because these are two totally different stables.  The New Breed are not ECW Originals so it wouldn't really make scence to put them in the ECW Originals page. 66.235.35.120 07:59, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem I have is that this article and the ECW Originals article are, for all intents and purposes, mirrors of each other and all signs point to them staying that way until one of the stables dissolves -- and if one stable dissolves there's no reason for the other one to exist. «»bd(talk stalk) 19:32, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see no mirrors so keep separate--Cowboy From Hell 21:03, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Aside from the fact that they have the exact same information? I should know, I wrote the bulk of both articles.«»bd(talk stalk) 02:21, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wait if we were to merge them both which page becomes obsolete--Cowboy From Hell 23:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not obsolete. Instead of having two articles detailing nothing stables it would be one article detailing the feud (like The Invasion), which would certainly brings the notability into question, but that's a whole other issue.«»bd(talk stalk) 02:20, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

text: The term "ECW Originals" existed long before this feud started, I remember Joey Styles using the term shortly after the launch of the ECW brand. So I think they should not be merged. The term ECW originals describes both the current stable, and any wrestler who competed in the original ECW, and there is no way to be sure if either stable would break-up after the feud is over. TJ Spyke 09:22, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: I'm just going to post this here. You can judge for yourself whether or not the New Breed was a stable in 2006. Based on what I've read and in my opinion, they are, but it wasn't promoted as much as it is now. Mshake3 22:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They used the phrase because that was the overall phrase used to promote the new ECW. That doesn't make them a stable. Especially considering how little screen time Knox/Test spent with Heyman or Big Show.«»bd(talk stalk) 00:10, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well there was that tag match at the ballroom in August or September. Still, there was clearly a group of wrestlers that were associated with Heyman, and they at least deserve a mention. Mshake3 03:09, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And they are.«»bd(talk stalk) 03:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not by name. Where's Mike Knox and Test? Mshake3 02:25, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Happy?«»bd(talk stalk) 02:47, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006

message: The faction is not in need of an Incarnations section, when we can just note current and former members, or integrate the information into the article, because A: the faction is active and B: it is not necessarily a notable faction.--ProtoWolf 19:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incarnations Unnecessary
Talk:Half-life of knowledge

message: I placed this article in the psych-stub category because it had to do with the study of knowledge, which seems to be a branch of psych, but I could see perhaps where its more sociology or perhaps intergrative.  If I'm incorrect please tell me, and correct.  ThanksD-rew 18:52, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the article reads like an ad for his book. LoudLizard (talk) 21:00, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Flagged as Incomplete as clearly important to Wikipedia and thus deserving experts' attention S a g a  C i t y (talk) 08:40, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs work
Talk:Amplified fragment length polymorphism

message: "... followed by ligation of complementary double stranded adaptors to the ends of the restriction fragments."
:I don't understand this phrase. Similarly "... ligation of restriction half-site specific adaptors to all restriction fragments.". Presumably this is the same thing?
"A subset of the restriction fragments are then amplified using two primers complementary to the adaptor and restriction site fragments."
:Does this mean that the primers span the end of the fragment and the adaptor?
:: OK, I think I got it now... I have tried to reword the article to make this clearer, but I may have screwed it up a bit in the process... --Dan|(talk) 13:22, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification? 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
* Oppose – Google scholar search finds thousands of papers that include the string "Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP)", and only one with the words "AFLP is not an acronym".  Whatever the original intention of the authors, the acronym clearly stands for the words in most reliable sources.  Dicklyon (talk) 04:28, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Octavio Ocampo

message: Octavio Ocampo is a very notable artist whose work is displayed around the world. There's a gallery of his work here in Edinburgh at the holograph museum. Whoever set this to be deleted should have done their homework better. Kellogs22 18:59, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please note: The "homework" is to be done by the editor(s) putting up the article. Failing to provide the required notability can lead to the article being deleted. If you have reference links please add them. Fountains of Bryn Mawr 19:09, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A Ukrainian general interest magazine is publishing a feature on Octavio Ocampo in their March 2007 issue. They secured the consent of his agents in the United States to publish illustrations as well. I can forward the article in .pdf format when it comes out. I would argue that this is a least the beginning of notability...
Francois Demers 12:35, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coming up about Octavio Ocampo 

message: This external link is now pointing to a collection of advertising links:
* Thumbnail catalog of works
  http://funnypagenet.com/illusions-of-octavio-ocampo/ Thumbnail catalog of works
50.36.25.114 (talk) 06:13, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invalid link
Talk:Head shadow

message: I've been generally putting stubs having to do with acoustics in the physics stub category.  I've been thinking of creating an acoustics stub, but haven't had the time.  If I am incorrect in putting these types of articles in the physics stub category, please correct here, then tell me.  Thanks. D-rew 18:55, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello. Although so long time ago, but I reply to this. Can I put this page to other project? (medicine or physiology) This page is much related to sound localization. LR0725 (talk) 01:26, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree it should be moved, but I propose merging it into the page Head-related transfer function which deals with the mathematical description/implementation of measurements related to this topic. SuddenBowsprit (talk) 12:36, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Indel

message: I believe the definition of "microindel" here is misleading. This article suggests that microindel is specifically defined as an indel ranging from 1-50bp in size:
This is not a general rule. The reference it goes back to self-defines "microindel" in this way:
As the source article states, they are defining the terms "indel" and "microindel" in particular ways for the sake of that article. 
The reason I bring this up is because recently I have been considering the use of the term "microindels" to refer to the set of microdeletions and microduplications (or "microinsertions" if you will) in a genome. In the genome sequencing and medical genetics world, a microdeletion can be up to 50Mb in size, so it seems inconsistent with the definition of "microindel" presented in this article, which appears to be solely based on this one source. A source that was not attempting to define the term for all fields, but for the particular article within which the term was being used. 
In the sequencing world, at least, "indel" is common shorthand for "small indel" or "short indel", which would be generally defined as an insertion or deletion from 0-50bp or 0-100bp in size. "Microdeletion" and "microduplication" are referring to larger events--commonly thought of as at least tens of kilobases in size, and ranging well into the megabase range. Therefore, in this community at least, a "microindel" seems to logically follow the definition of a larger insertion or deletion. 
That said, I have difficulty coming up with a source defining the term "microindel" in this way. I would therefore suggest that at the very least this article be changed to reflect that the definition given for "microindel" was particular to that study, e.g. "Gonzalez et al., 2007 defined microindel as "an indel that results in a net gain or loss of from 1 to 50 nucleotides."
Mjatucla (talk) 18:18, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of Microindel

message: I think the information presented here is a bit out of date. The article states: "The term "indel" has been co-opted in recent years by genome scientists for use in the sense described above." I would argue that in the past five years, not only has "indel" been co-opted, but it is now more commonly used to refer to one of the following:
# An insertion or deletion detected by array CGH, commonly in the hundreds of kilobases to megabases in size.
# A small insertion or deletion detected by next generation sequencing.
Mjatucla (talk) 18:18, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Updating 

message: — Assignment last updated by SmolKraken (talk) 23:54, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Bioinformatics
Talk:Citrullination

message: The page refers to a modification of the side chain of an amino-acid residue in a protein. While the side-chains are fine, the peptide backbone is improperly rendered. There is an extra oxygen, making the bond an ester, rather than a peptide bond. The sequence should proceed: amine-alpha carbon-carbonyl carbon-next amine, without the extra oxygen.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Docpelletier (talk • contribs) 16:11, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in molecular structer 

message: This section has no references and appears to be speculation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:14D:8A00:6D4:466:190C:2B79:500E (talk) 03:12, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Detection of citrullinated peptides and proteins" is speculation
Talk:Histone methyltransferase

message: *Histone methyltransferases in cancer. 
*Small Molecule Inhibitors to the Histone Methyltransferase EZH2  
Rod57 (talk) 09:37, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Could someone include reference to this information from https://www.bbc.com/news/health-49682583 Common cold stopped by experimental approach, viruses were unable to replicate inside cells which had the instructions for a protein (called methyltransferase SETD3) switched off?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.30.103.1 (talk) 23:00, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role of SETD3 in Common cold
Talk:RentPath

message: Prism Media has been involved in a mass Wikipedia link spam campaign since 2005. See User_talk:65.166.218.250 for a detailed account of their exploits. The big question is how many more link spammed Prism domains and user aliases are still waiting to be found on Wikipedia? My guess is thousands. Should this information be placed on the main Primedia page?  I recommend black listing for all Primedia wiki links. (Requestion 18:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it should not be in the Primedia article since Prism has not been part of Primedia since 2005-08.  Since the two separated long ago, what guilt do you assign to Primedia that causes you to recommend punishing them? —RandallJones 03:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I thought they were the same company. Thank you for the business separation info, I'll check it out. The Electronic Musician (emusician.com) magazine is listed on Primedia's wiki page and it was one of the heavily spammed links reported at Talk:Penton_Media.  The Electronic Musician page also says they are owned by Primedia.  So I assumed they were the same company. Maybe there is a mistake or mix up somewhere. Let me correct my previous statement: I recommend black listing for all Prism Media wiki links listed on the Talk:Penton_Media page. (Requestion 04:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for taking care not to incautiously lump them together.  Since Prism's titles were Primedia's not so long ago, there may well be some in the list. —RandallJones 08:24, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have removed the Electronic Musician link because is it now owned by Prism Business Media which is in fact Penton Media. Hopefully this will prevent any future confusion. I have checked the spam contribution logs and it appears that all of the Prism Media link spam occurred after Primedia sold the business unit in August 2005. I retract all link spam claims I made against Primedia.  Sorry to be a bother. (Requestion 21:43, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Spamming 

message: My name is Bill Bender and I am the Vice President, Marketing at RentPath. I would like to make the following edit: "RentPath named Marc P. Lefar as President and CEO on April 4, 2016."http://www.rentpath.com/marc-lefar-new-rentpath-ceo/https://www.linkedin.com/in/marc-lefar-6b42657RentPath, LLC (talk) 19:47, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marc Lefar named RentPath CEO April 4, 2016
File talk:Mongol Empire map.gif

message: Burma was a part of the Mongol Empire.Haabet 07:29, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Burma

message: This image is wrong. Belarus has never been a part of Mongolia. --Dymitr (talk) 18:04, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Belarus 

message: This map would be a lot more useful if the animation could be stopped - or static versions of the steps were available. As it is, it's impossible to even process the last "stage" before it resets. At least slow it down! Nickrz (talk) 16:17, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I second that. It move much too fast.--¿3family6 contribs 22:02, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  stop motion