Talk:Raai Laxmi

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- -- Thesocialistesq/M.lesocialiste 01:08, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Lakshmi Rai is from Bellary like that of Prakash Rai. But the article says she is from Belgaum which is false and misleading.
This shows that Wiki is a place for all wrong information and has no value and should never be taken as a reference for any purpose - even as a toilet paper.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.66.156 (talk) 02:27, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Kindly read the refernce first; she born in belguam not in bellary; and don't remove the language scripts, it is a common practice to add language scripts in wikipedia articles.
http://www.hindu.com/fr/2008/02/22/stories/2008022251110400.htm
59.92.129.247 (talk) 08:09, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  She is born in bellary 

message: Her birthyear seems to remain a topic to discuss. One or more user(s) are continuously changing her birthyear, not to any random year, but always to 1981! And indeed many many other sites, incl. 
*1, 
*2, 
*3, 
*4 and
*5 among others 
do quote her birthyear as 1981. Hardly none of the above sites seems to be a reliable source, though. Oneindia itself, which published the news that says she was born in 1989, seems unreliable, as they themselves quote her birthyear as 1981 here. So there is uncertaintly about this issue. I myself would rather believe she was born in 1981. Most Indian actresses (and any other females) won't disclose their age or birthyear that easily, Wikipedia is the one to suffer from this. Johannes003 (talk) 17:16, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthyear 

message: Most popular actress in Kerala?  On what basis?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.98.251.120 (talk) 02:42, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popularity 

message: Dear Editors! There has been a discussion on India Portal related to mentioning of caste of subjects. The point is that mentioning caste of people, who have nothing to do with their caste, is found to be unnecessary by few editors. Hence the caste of the subject person needs to be deleted from the biography. I am not deleting the caste as of now but am only posting this here so that the regular editors of this article are well aware of it beforehand and no edit-wars take place. For details of discussion held on the portal please refer Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Mentioning_caste_of_Individuals. Your views if any are welcome there or even here.  And.... as the reasons of exclusion of caste pointed out were "irrelavant to notability of subject person", "privacy of the subject person", "inclusion of caste is like branding individuals", etc. other information included in the article which also fall under these cases will also be removed after discussions. Examples of it included religion, non-notable spouse's and children's and parents' information, previous occupation, lived in places, non-notability related educational qualification, etc.  Your views on this are also welcome here or at the India portal. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 13:32, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Not here, please. There is a community discussion taking place at WT:INB and I would advise people to read the entire discussion before forming an opinion because the above summary is incorrect. Nothing more need be said here. - Sitush (talk) 01:41, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Mentioning Caste

message: An image used in this article, File:Lakshmi rai.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Lakshmi rai.jpg)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:11, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Lakshmi rai.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:50, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Lakshmi Rai00.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:05, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Laxmi Rai at CCL match.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Please change "Date of birth May 5, 1989" http://entertainment.oneindia.in/celebs/lakshmi-rai.htmlhttp://www.imdb.com/name/nm2843559/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_smhttp://spicyonion.com/actress/lakshmi-rai-biography/
Jvaria (talk) 06:43, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done. Please provide a reliable source for the birthdate. —Psychonaut (talk) 09:05, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth year 

message: I'm not sure if this should require an explanation for experienced editors and administrators, but apparently it does. A central point of Wikipedia's verifiability policy, specifically described in the WP:SOURCE section, is to prohibit the addition of material based on unpublished sources. An OTRS ticket is not a published source. If there are reasonable concerns about using other sources, the disputed material should stay removed until a consensus for its inclusion is found (WP:ONUS/WP:BURDEN/WP:BLP), although the mere existence of an e-mail saying otherwise may be unsuitable to justify such a concern as well. WP:BLPPRIVACY could be relevant. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:39, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed thanks for the clarification @ToBeFree. I've been looking at the OTRS as the conclusive source for the DOB and is simply inaccessible similar to that of offline sources, but not as something unpublished! Now looking back, I'm the disruptor — DaxServer (t · m · c) 08:18, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  An OTRS ticket is not a published source