lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Provisional government

message: Why isn't the Continental Congress formally designed a Provisional Government?  It seems to meet all the required criterion. BradMajors (talk) 22:15, 27 November 2007 
(UTC)
* I have added to the list. BradMajors (talk) 23:16, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Can we include here Nepal? Its government is declared as an interim government since they would abolish their monarchy that has ruled them them for years. (NOTE:Click on my provided links for more information.) -Pika ten10 (talk) 13:19, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we...??? 

message: Never in Irish History was there a state called "Southern Ireland". The provisional government should be referred to as either the Provisional Government of the Irish Free State or the Provisional Government of Ireland. Ste01 (talk) 06:21, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Provisional Government of Southern Ireland...wrong

message: "...political void has been created by the collapse of a very large government". Why would anyone want to state that? Is that some sort of definition of the term? During wartime there have been all sorts of governments set up that have been provisional in nature. Should these be included? I can name some; my own country the Faroe Islands in 1940, the Kingdom of Finland in 1918, West Virginia in 1861.
I suggest that we include these and maybe others as well. Failed states, unilaterally declared states, etc. Do these fall under the term "provisional government"?
--JJ-Hammer (talk) 19:59, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Why very large?

message: Is it provisional because it says it is, or because it rules for a short time, or because it declares that it will exist for a limited time?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.103.145 (talk) 16:19, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: ontology

message: As far as I know, the government of Eritrea is still transitional.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.16.187.179 (talk) 14:03, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eritrea still has it? 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Interim president. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 7#Interim president until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.   talk 22:16, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Interim president" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 
Talk:Edmonton-Strathcona (provincial electoral district)

message: When are we adding the 2023 election results? 2604:3D09:1689:300:4C1:7378:8713:33C0 (talk) 16:17, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2023 Election results
Talk:1983–84 New York Islanders season

message: The Islanders were the Wales Conference Champions, thus they won the Prince of Wales Trophy. Why do we have both listed in the articles Infobox? GoodDay (talk) 16:25, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Conference Champions

message: I'm not sure how to dissambiguate the names of players on the chart. Billy Smith for example should be linked to Billy Smith (ice hockey).Singingdaisies (talk) 07:09, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help please
Talk:Spanish Courts for Violence against Women

message: Verano, the deletion period has expired, and if you want to re-request the deletion of Spanish Courts for Violence against Women you need to give reasons.  There is no "Editors Comments" section, no direct translation of newspaper articles, and its not just a list of news articles.  ¿So whats the reason now?  It starts to look like your working in this Court and don´t like the world to know whats going on there! :)  Joking of course! Seriously though, please put your reasons, specific reasons, on the Discussion page, thanks, 77.210.123.175 (talk) 18:15, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: (and without even one opportunity given to correct any failings! Pls look at the contents section, its not "a collection of newspaper articles!"Rubén Mar (talk) 16:07, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

text: As you have been explained in wp.es, This could make an interesting essay but it is not at all encyclopedic material. Please read the WP policies in your spanish discussion page and spare your time and ours. --Varano (talk) 15:20, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

message: tags can be removed at any time, for any reason or for no reason.  If removed, they are not to be restored.  If the original prodder or any other editor continues to believe that deletion is appropriate, use the articles for deletion process.  GRBerry 22:29, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROD 

message: My thanks to the editors who put in the major effort to improve the article, resulting in a clear decision to keep it.  The best possible outcome of the AFD process is an improved article!  GRBerry 15:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD 

message: Zape82 has erased and minimized the issue of judicial complaints about the Court´s law´s constitutionality, that is a flagrant manipulation of the FACTS, they take no account of the rights of others, they are against the freedom of information, and consider that their own objectives and opinions as more important than any other persons or groups view.
This is a disgrace, a further violation of the human right of the freedom of information, something that has been largely overcome in Spain pasts. Rubén Mar 17:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As you know my nickname is Varano, not Verano. And I can hardly be acused of biasing the article since I haven't edited a word. --Varano 23:14, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political-POVs from Zape82 and Verano
Talk:Calorad

message: Does anyone know if it's true that EYI has lost its exclusive right to calorad?  I hear a new division of Kaire International called Nysante has also got the rights to Calorad...clayton@achieversinaction.com
:It looks like it.  --Merovingian (T, C, E) 23:33, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of U.S. cities with high transit ridership

message: This list seems very arbitrary: what is considered "high" ? --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 22:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Inclusion criteria

message: The American Community Survey for 2006 tracks public transit commutes as well.  This list should be updated with those data.  The chart that I have added is based on those data.
--Arturoramos (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 20:00, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated Data 

message: This article is extremely vague. What exactly counts as "public transit?" The TRANWORK variable in the ACS is coded with specific transit modes--those should be elucidated in the article so that people can know what is being counted.
I am doing some work with the ACS right now, and my numbers almost match but not exactly. To get the closest match I had to include the TRANWORK indicator for "Trains" which may or may not be in most people's definition of "public transit." Could the author who originally produced these numbers update the article?
I have numbers from the 2009 ACS, but I didn't want to update this page with those numbers until I figured out what was used in the 2006 version of this page (for consistency).
-Jimmy  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.219.80.10 (talk) 14:34, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vagueness 
Talk:Sherwood Park (disambiguation)

message: This page is a malplaced disambiguation page. If "Sherwood Park" is the name of the main article, then "Sherwood Park (disambiguation)" is the correct title for the DAB page. If there is no page that actually uses "Sherwood Park", but it is only a redirect, then the DAB page should be found at Sherwood Park. I tried to correct this problem by making "Sherwood Park" the name of the article, but some enterprising editor has changed it back.  Snocrates 22:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid you were the enterprising one here. Communities in Canada follow the comma convention, see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (settlements)#Canada. Please discuss before making the moves. Thank you. --Qyd (talk) 01:10, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure how the naming convention justifies this DAB page being malplaced ?? which is what my comments above have addressed. The convention also states: "Cities which either have unique names or are unquestionably the most significant place sharing their name can have undisambiguated titles". "Sherwood Park" is a unique name, and thus no province is needed. Snocrates 01:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sherwood is a common name, and "Park" a common name suffix. Sherwood Park is not some park, as the name "Sherwood Park" would suggest. "Sherwood Park, Alberta" is clearly a community in Alberta though. Hence the need to stick to the convention. By the way, Sherwood (Edmonton), is a close-by community inside Edmonton. If you think this disambiguation page should go to Sherwood Park, by all means, move it, but don't move the community page there please.--Qyd (talk) 02:03, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that was the whole point of what I wrote above originally. If the article is not there, it should be the DAB page. Snocrates 05:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Improper DAB page
Template talk:Tillamook County, Oregon

message: Idiotville no longer exists in any form. It is not an unincorporated community. It is not a community. Nobody lives there. Why does it need to go into the template? Katr67 (talk) 01:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's common to link these articles in these templates, even if (1) it's uninhabited, and (2) there's no remainder of human development at the site.  Nyttend (talk) 01:34, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh, that's weird, but if you say so. Katr67 (talk) 03:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idiotville
Talk:Atlanta CV Drum and Bugle Corps

message: I've realised I have no clue how to do the references correctly.  I can get them in the article, but cannot get them to link.  Can someone please show an example or help correct?  Werecowmoo (talk) 22:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the relevent gizmo to a ==References== section. Hope that helps. Splash - tk 23:05, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creating References

message: The words "we" and "our" should be eliminated from the article.  After a quick read I only saw them in the philosophy section.  Other than that I don't see why Wikipedia is so deletion-happy. Midnight Q (talk) 18:19, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philosophy 

message: What was it about about this article that was considered blatant advertising?  Midnight Q (talk) 19:09, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion 
Talk:Los Angeles County Chief Executive Office

message: All of the information entered is legal public information from the county of Los Angeles Website and other county public documents. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tornados28 (talk • contribs) 22:49, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh, no. Only Federal Government text is within the public domain. The County asserts copyright on other sites, see here and here. Although the items are public records under the California Public Records Act, the County still reserve the rights of republishing, especially for commercial use. In addition, even with public domain text, it is poor form to not cite. Calwatch (talk) 03:48, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Public domain

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:M39 series 5-ton 6×6 truck

message: I propose that M54 5-ton 6x6 truck  be merged into M35 series 2½-ton 6x6 cargo truck. I think that the content in the M54 5-ton 6x6 truck article can easily be explained in the context of M35 series 2½-ton 6x6 cargo truck, and the M35 series 2½-ton 6x6 cargo truck article is of a reasonable size that the merging of M54 5-ton 6x6 truck will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Kalininos (talk) 21:22, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you think -ton and 5-ton trucks have in common other than their cabs and some (not all) engines? They are completly different trucks that only look the same. If you have any mechanical questions please ask. Thank you. Sammy D III (talk) 11:23, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  must be merged with M35 series 2½-ton 6x6 cargo truck
Talk:Wetaskiwin (disambiguation)

message: This page is a malplaced disambiguation page. If "Wetaskiwin" is the name of the main article, then "Wetaskiwin (disambiguation)" is the correct title for the DAB page. If there is no page that actually uses "Wetaskiwin", but it is only a redirect, then the DAB page should be found at Wetaskiwin. I tried to correct this problem by making "Wetaskiwin" the name of the article, but some enterprising editor has changed it back. Snocrates 22:56, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Improper DAB page
Talk:Crimping (singing)

message: procrastinators? protagonists surely HairyDan (talk) 22:59, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  hahah, i've seen waaaaaay more "unotable" things in wikipedia. Look at the madness in Star Wars articles for example --Leladax 20:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  here here, just because u seem to not to like mighty boosh dosn't mean the article is not notable, alot of people dont like alot of shows that are written about on wikipedia but they dont go round demanding that their subcategories are deleted --Jkneon 02:23, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

text:  surely this should just be a part of the mighty boosh article?  especially as it doesn't exist outside of the mighty boosh.  oh and i am a massive fan of the program, i just don't think crimping needs its own article until it exists significantly outside of the boosh. Spunkymcpunk 15:37, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  can you explain why other franchises should have separate articles and not this? --Leladax 15:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  that isn't a valid argument as far as wikipedia is concerned. there is no reason for this article to exist seperately.  crimping is inseperable from the mighty boosh. notice how all the 'notable crimps' are from the mighty boosh? because it doesn't exist anywhere else.  wikipedia is not a mighty boosh fan site.  go start a forum for that stuff. Spunkymcpunk (talk) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

text:  It does sound a bit like crimping it but i'd have to see the movie....anyway...i believe this does deserve its own article because of the amount of people now doing it...I was walking down a street and there were kids..crimping...i was amazed but it could start becoming something quite common...the Boosh may have started something which may spread beyond the Boosh genre --Bailo26  8:45, 5 December 2007 (GMT)
support the proposition to merge. Apart from a small paragraph that could easily be merged into the Mighty Boosh article there's noting notable on this page. the "notable crimps" section should be wikiquote and the "notable crimpers" section is completely unnecessary.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Agent452 (talk • contribs) 03:03, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

text: So it would seem that the result is to merge. Shall I take care of it? Agent452 (talk) 15:35, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Joseph Priestley/Confessio philosophi

message: I hope that I can be forgiven for quoting a pertinent passage from the primary text.  Many readers might not want to read the whole of Confessio philosophi, so for convenience, I have extracted two passages that pertain to free will. Willow (talk) 23:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Two relevant passages from ''Confessio philosophi''
Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/300 (film)

message: Further to party agreement that all issues have been amicably resolved, and the implementation of changes to the article to satisfy consensus established, this case is closed as successful. My thanks to all parties for sticking this out: we tried to get Mediation going twice before, but my lack of availability put an end to that. However, we've recently managed to get a case opened and closed within 4 days—an impressive turnaround. All the best in your future editing, AGK § 23:31, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Case closed
Talk:St. Thomas Aquinas High School (Florida)

message: I eliminated a paragraph that referenced a Miami Herald article that said nothing about any scandal.  The information I deleted was not found even after I conducted an internet search to try to put an appropriate reference to the paragraph. Since there is no reference to support the paragraph,I am wondering if it was just vandalism. NancyHeise (talk) 14:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  scandal 

message: It is very notable that St. Thomas won the state championship in football. I wonder if someone would like to write a small history section on St. Thomas sports accomplishments. There was a former St. Thomas student on the US Olympic team this year as well. Might be interesting to mention. NancyHeise  talk 02:07, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: State Championship

message: It appeared to me that indeed, a graduate had committed murder. I re-inserted him. This should not be deleted without good cause. This article is not to make the school "look better." It is an article that should contain facts. If some facts are embarrassing, so be it. There is no reason for the school to be embarrassed in any event. The school did nothing wrong. It makes the rest of the article seem more credible by comparison. If everything is a whitewash, it makes the article seem like pr. Student7 (talk) 22:23, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Felon

message: The Bienes Center for the Arts appears to be affiliated with the school.  Shouldn't this be mentioned in the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fcoulter (talk • contribs) 17:20, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bienes Center 

message: I added ref improve, primary and advert tags. The advert can be dispensed with after a little more rewrite. The primary: does any reliable source consider the details of enrollment process/requirements notable enough to report them? The content should probably go, that would help with the advert tone. In general there is quite bit of material with no references. - - MrBill3 (talk) 19:23, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags
Talk:Golf Halt railway station

message: The IPA representation of the pronunciation needs syllable breaks adding. I would do this, but I don't know where they should be. I've added the ones I can take a reasonable guess at, but they are not necessarily correct and more are needed.  /ɡɔr.sav.auðaχaɪ.draɪ.ɡɔdan.hɛðɔ.ɡlɛðɔ.ɬoːn.pɛn.r̥ɪn.arɛɨr.draːɨθ.kɛr.ɛ.dɪɡ.ɪ.ɔn/. Thryduulf (talk) 00:14, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  IPA needs syllable breaks 

message: Are we sure about the translation? "a'idraigodanheddogleddol" is a very odd way to say "and its dragon teeth" in Welsh. In fact, I would have said it means "and its dragon under northern peace" (a'i draig o dan hedd ogleddol). For "and its dragon teeth" I'd have said "a'idannedddraig" Any thoughts? garik (talk) 15:47, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The name was misspelled, as the photo now proves. I've corrected the translation. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 20:58, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! I corrected the translation further. "hedd ogleddol Lôn Penrhyn" doesn't really allow the translation "peaceful northern road". Hedd is a noun modified by gogleddol. Garik (talk) 18:45, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Though "the peace of the northern Penrhyn road" is possible too, if we take gogleddol to be preceding the noun it's modifying (which is possible in poetic registers). The mutation of gogleddol to ogleddol is odd either way. We'd expect it if the adjective were modifying hedd and hedd were feminine, but not if it's modifying lôn (whatever the gender of lôn).Hedd is standardly masculine (so we shouldn't expect the adjective to be mutated either way) but like so many Welsh nouns it does sometimes occur as feminine historically and (I guess) in some dialects. The mutation of dan as ddan is odd too, for the same sort of reason.  Garik (talk) 18:51, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation

message: 'Most sources' agree that Llanfair PG is the longest name? Well, not Wikipedia as I came here from the link on the Rhoose Cardiff Wales International Airport station page, which claims that that is the longest station name according to Network Rail. Llanfair PG is not recognised by Network Rail in its long form and so isn't actually the longest station name if you go by timetables and official names. However, my real point is to get a bit of consistency on Wikipedia and so if no-one objects, I will tidy this up GlenUsk2 (talk) 14:51, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect information
Talk:Tattva (Ayyavazhi)

message: How is this list of 96 tatvas any different than the 96 tatvas acknowledged by almost every other hindu tradition and ayurveda? Should this really be a separate page when these ideas are not unique to Ayyavazhi? I would propose that this page be expanded to include all dharmic religions that include the identical worldview (i.e. add more tags and expand the lede). I would suggest a merge with Human Body – 96 Constituent principles or Tatwas of Siddha Medicine except that this article is much better written (ignoring its narrowing lede). I would however instead argue for the sanskrit spelling of tattva over tatva or tatwa. As I have never done a merge or anything like this I would ask for a little guidance from  or any other experienced user. Iṣṭa Devatā (talk) 06:32, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: And from what I can tell, these are not derived from the Akilathirattu Ammanai as the article claims, though it is otherwise a great list and much cleaner than similar lists on wiki.Iṣṭa Devatā (talk) 06:35, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: A source for the list from the Shaiva Siddhanta tradition.  Iṣṭa Devatā (talk) 07:51, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

text: I've renamed several articles, and added some info. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is this different? 

message: almost exact copy of the section there on Jñānendriya. Perhaps some of the text can be added to improve the merged to article. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Jñānendriya]] into [[Tattva (Ayyavazhi)]]
Talk:Lachine massacre

message: Isn't the Lachine massacre the first act of war in King William's War? Creuzbourg (talk) 13:49, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Magic♪piano 02:15, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not? It took place after the beginning of the war, and was instigated by the English in New York. Creuzbourg (talk) 07:51, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It might qualify as the first act of war in the New York/Quebec area, but hostilities of a similar nature (involving hundreds of combatants) took place several months earlier in New England.  This is all documented in King William's War. Magic♪piano 11:31, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  King William's War