Talk:Mechanix

message: :Image:Combat KIMB.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:07, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Combat KIMB.jpg

message: :Image:Image-Nolifetillleather.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 22:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Image-Nolifetillleather.jpg

message: On 4 February 2008,  removed the external  Youtube link that supported the statement,
without comment.  I have added this link back.  I feel it is an excellent citation; Mustaine clearly says those exact words at the beginning of the clip. Noca2plus (talk) 23:02, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Youtube reference 

message: "When Mustaine was kicked out, Metallica changed the lyrics, added a small bridge section, and retitled the song "The Four Horsemen" but still gave Mustaine credit for the song, although he asked them not to use his material.[citation needed] "
In the re-release of "Killing is My Business.. and Busness is Good!", Mustaine clearly states that he did not want Metallica to use his material for their "Kill 'em All" album.  Look it up in the album booklet.JackorKnave (talk) 20:03, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for taking interest in this page Jackor.  It could use some TLC!  I put the  tag on that sentence to try to get someone to list, in the reference section, where that idea came from.  It sounds like that person might be you!  The reason a citation is needed is because verifiability is Wikipedia policy (see WP:V and WP:CITE).  I only have the original release of that album, so I haven't read the liner notes you're talking about.  Also, I've never cited liner notes from an album before, so I'm not exactly sure of the format.  I looked through WP:CITET but didn't find a template.  I'm sure you can copy the format from some other music articles.  I'm going to put the  tag back in for now.  Yank it when you're done.  Noca2plus (talk) 23:02, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Don't need citation

message: I read this page tonight and it blagged my mind. It reads as if someone has just copy and pasted the same paragraph of information 4 times over, is this necessary? Panzer16 (talk) 23:40, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Necessary?  No.  It'd be great if you took the time to improve it! Noca2plus (talk) 00:45, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same Info 

message: Why is this called The Mechanix, the song title is just Mechanix, with no The attached  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.150.236.209 (talk) 13:22, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  THE Mechanix? 

message: BoxxyBoy, please comment here regarding the back and forth edits on the article. I'll leave a message on the IP's talk page about it. David O. Johnson (talk) 21:59, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This unregistered user has been constantly vandalizing anything to do with Mechanix. It's getting quite annoying. What's funny is that they said I was a vandal and could be blocked from editing, when clearly they are in the wrong! Could we please get a moderator involved and get this person blocked from editing? BoxxyBoy (talk) 22:02, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have dealt with that IP before when they had edit warred on the articles Psychotic Supper and Edison's Medicine, regarding a source which was in fact an image, which was not reliable. They argued and said that the reverts were omitting information, but they were refusing to listen to the fact that the source they were using was not reliable, and was inconsistent. HorrorLover555 (talk) 22:09, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have checked out their talk page and saw that they have been involved in numerous edit wars. This is getting quite annoying. BoxxyBoy (talk) 22:12, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

text: I fail to see how they are “vandalising” the page when it’s true it’s a Metallica song originally released by Metallica in 1982 and later covered by Megadeth in 1985. You keep ignoring that very important piece of info for some reason. 85.255.233.156 (talk) 12:54, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Then they need to discuss on the talk page regarding their edits. No one on Wikipedia, not even an IP, gets to say "my way only" as they do not own the article. If they want their edits included, then they need to come to a consensus on the talk page, in which they need to present the edit they want changed and then wait until there is others that can work on an agreement to include their edits. HorrorLover555 (talk) 13:01, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

text: It is not a "cover". If it is to be listed as a cover, then it should be credited to the band Panic. This would also mean songs like Sunday Morning, Secret, Ragdoll and Not Coming Home by Maroon 5 would need to be listed as Kara's Flowers covers, due to the band recording demos of the song, and Set the World Afire would need to be listed as a Fallen Angels cover. BoxxyBoy (talk) 18:40, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ongoing reverts