lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Broxtowe (UK Parliament constituency)

message: She is a prominent candidate. I have seen her on BBC Question Time arguing with the leader of UKIP. Wasn't she a government minister? As far as I know she is a well known celebrity, but I don't see this represented in the main article. There are plenty of sources to describe the facts that add up to demonstrate that she is a well known candidate. This is an encyclopaedia, therefore we need to add more information about this lady. Waiting for a consensus before adding anything. Let me know. Cheers. (said while drinking Longjing tea from China)   Senotshtooms (talk) 14:29, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No. We don't do this for other constituencies; moreover, Wikipedia is not a place to hold an election campaign. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:31, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anna Soubry 
Talk:Buckingham (UK Parliament constituency)

message: The BBC piece quoted in the article states "John Bercow says he will stand down as Commons Speaker and MP at the next election or on 31 October, whichever comes first." Given that there is no longer enough time for a general election to be held between now and 31 October, this appears to indicate that he will stand down as an MP on that date, and that there will therefore be a by-election in Buckingham. This article in the Daily Mirror says "on Monday 4 November... Mr Bercow - a former Tory - will resign as MP for Buckingham, likely prompting a by-election for his seat." (I'm not sure if the Daily Mirror counts as a reliable source?). Should the article note that, if Mr Bercow stands down as an MP, there will be a by-election? Alekksandr (talk) 22:25, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: By-election?
Talk:Rozzano

message: I have updated the name of the mayor and the political party he belongs to in the infobox  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eliss96 (talk • contribs) 21:45, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Government - Mayor 

message: I have crated the subtitle "History" in which I wrote information about the birth and development of the municipality by using as sources the official website of the municipality and a book  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eliss96 (talk • contribs) 21:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: I have added the subtitle "main sights" to talk about the attractions offered by the area, dividing the natural ones such as parks, from the architectural and artistic ones.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eliss96 (talk • contribs) 22:00, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main sights 

message: I have added some information about public buildings which give relevance to the municipality. 
The sources I have used, such as institutional websites and books, have been mentioned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eliss96 (talk • contribs) 10:14, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public buildings 

message: With regard to private buildings, I have included descriptions, curiosities and insights.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eliss96 (talk • contribs) 10:40, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Private buildings
Talk:Burslem (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I usually defer to Craig on most matters, however, I question him on party labels as his publications used a house-style in preference to greater accuracy. 
The Times tagged him as a Conservative (Unionist) which resulted in their subsequent publication House of Commons 1931 describing him as such. The Times is known to make mistakes in this area but I have not managed to find any correction. The Times was the source that The Liberal Year Book relied on and they published him as a Conservative (Unionist) in their publications following the election. Politicsresources.net relies on the same source to compile its database and follows that same description.
During the election campaign the Staffordshire Advertiser described him as a Constitutionalist candidate. Immediately after the election the Advertiser refined their description to National candidate. In their post election publication, the Constitutional Year Book, the Conservative Party described him as a National candidate. 
Liberals in Parliament 1924-1994 by Rif Winfield is a publication that specialised in this area and Winfield states three 'non-party' candidates secured election as supporters of the National Government and that one of these, Allen, immediately took the Liberal National whip. 
I trust the Staffordshire Advertiser reporting more than The Times, I trust the Conservative's description more than the Liberals and I trust the research undertaken by Winfield more than Craig when it comes down to the presentation of that research. Therefore I think Allen should appear as National in the 1931 election box and Liberal National in the MP listing. Graemp (talk) 14:33, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: labeling William Allen
Talk:Amber Stevens West

message: The "contact details" & "Fan page" sections of this article keep being reinstated by the same editor. Both of these sections are clear promotion and are not encyclopaedic. Please explain why this information is in any way relevant/ significant enough to justify its inclusion in this Wikipedia article. Mrmatiko (talk) 20:59, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Contact details & Fan page sections
Talk:Callington (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Two politicians list in the 1640-1832 section need disambiguating, as their links currently target the wrong people - unfortunately they are out of Leigh Rayment's scope, so I'm not too sure how to construct their dab targets. These two are:
* Thomas Gardiner
* James Carew
Cheers, Zangar (talk) 00:41, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Gardiner done Motmit (talk) 21:35, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Politicians needing dab
Talk:Hammerton's Ferry

message: Quite an interesting article.  I was particularly impressed with the historical coverage.  The article meets all of the GA criteria... Johnfos (talk) 00:52, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article
Talk:Camelford (UK Parliament constituency)

message: The WP article on Henry Carey, 2nd Earl of Monmouth makes no mention of him sitting in Parliament.  Vernon White . . . Talk  22:05, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 1621-1622: Sir Henry Carey 

message: Francis Cottington, 1st Baron CottingtonThe WP article on Francis Cottington, 1st Baron Cottington makes no mention of him sitting in Parliament for this seat. Vernon White . . . Talk  22:36, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1624-1625: Francis Cottington 

message: The WP article on Gregory Clement has him elected for Fowey in 1648 but does not mention Camelford. Vernon White . . . Talk  22:50, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1647: Gregory Clement 

message: The WP article on William Harbord (politician) has him elected for Launceston but does not mention Camelford. Vernon White . . . Talk  22:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1679:  William Harbord 

message: The WP article on Ambrose Manaton has him elected for Launceston but does not mention Camelford. Vernon White . . . Talk  23:00, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1689: Ambrose Manaton 

message: The WP article on Robert Molesworth, 1st Viscount Molesworth (1656 – 1725),  makes no mention of him sitting in Parliament. Vernon White . . . Talk  23:05, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1695: Robert Molesworth 
Talk:Sesto San Giovanni

message: The part about Amri should be mentioned BUT I think it should be on some other page, such as "History of Sesto San Giovanni" rather than on the main article about the city itself (and that history part could also mention other parts such as when the city was founded etc...); or in a paragraph below. 2A02:8388:1601:800:BE5F:F4FF:FECD:7CB2 (talk) 12:28, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amri
Talk:Swiftweasel

message: The comments below were part of the discussion of the possible deletion of the Swiftweasel article. The deletion did not happen. In order to make the page organized I place this header over the discussion.Kilz (talk) 18:18, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: People should also note that polls are evil and should not be used to make decisions. Voting doesn't help much, so in the future, please state reasons/reasoning rather than a simple yes or no. --Kjoonlee 22:52, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Deletion Discussion (closed)

message: Come on, it is just a custom Firefox build with no relevant notes, I think this article is not encyclopedic.cc swiftfox Frututtle (talk) 23:56, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Swiftweasel worth?
Talk:Cardiff West (UK Parliament constituency)

message: NEIL MCEVOY IS NOT STANDING. HE'S ON CARDIFF COUNCIL NOW AS DEPUTY LEADER. MOHAMMED ISLAM IS THE OFFICIAL CANDIDATE WHO IS ACTUALLY CURRENTLY A COUNCILLOR FOR RIVERSIDE PLAID CYMRU. GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT. MCEVOY IS NOT STANDING OK!
http://www.plaidcymru.org/content.php?nID=807;lID=1
PROOF THAT MOHAMMED ISLAM EXISTS
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/columnists/2009/11/15/release-surely-it-escaped-91466-25168978/
PROOF THAT MOHAMMED ISLAM IS STANDING FOR CARDIFF WEST AT HTE NEXT ELECTION FOR PLAID CYMRU!
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/columnists/2009/11/15/release-surely-it-escaped-91466-25168978/
NOW, THERE IS NO REASON TO REMOVE MOHAMMED ISLAM ANY MORE YOU BLOODY RACISTS!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chilsusvitd (talk • contribs) 14:45, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Have any stories or controversies come out about the candidates? We are allowed to link anything in the article as long as it comes from a proper source. The South Wales Echo and Wales Online should be alright as sources because they are for the local newspaper. Can't actually access the website at the moment. If anyone finds anything interesting please feel free to add it to the main page and add a citation with    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elycardiff (talk • contribs) 09:00, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  South Wales Echo or Wales Online
Talk:Caerfyrddin (UK Parliament constituency)

message: The new Caerfyrddin constuency has similar boundaries to the Carmarthen constituency which existed between 1918 and 1997. However the previous borough constituency (1536-1918) was an entirely separate entity which should form an article of its own. If no one objects I shall action this in the next few days. Cheers Macs15 (talk)
:We tend not to split constituency articles by date, though. doktorb wordsdeeds 12:59, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: New article?
Talk:Carmarthen East and Dinefwr (UK Parliament constituency)

message: The page says Anthony Hughes is standing in 2019.
This reference says it's Havard Hughes. (So does the Talk Radio candidate list.)
https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/politics/election-candidates-carmarthen-east-dinefwr-16902973  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.176.246 (talk) 12:38, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  2019 election candidate error?
Talk:Chelsea (UK Parliament constituency)

message: This article may be about the former Chelsea constituency, but it was so different before the 1885 election that it would make sense to split it into two articles: Chelsea (two-seat UK Parliament constituency) and Chelsea (one-seat UK Parliament constituency).
From 1868 to 1885, the Chelsea constituency sent two members to Parliament and comprised Chelsea, Fulham, Hammersmith and Kensington. But just before the 1885 election it was split into five single-member constituencies: Chelsea, Fulham, Hammersmith, Kensington North and Kensington South.
As most of the text refers to the 1885–1997 period, I suggest a new article about the 1868-1885 two-seat constituency is created, Chelsea (two-seat UK Parliament constituency), and that all text that refers to that period and the time before it is moved to that article, while this article is renamed Chelsea (one-seat UK Parliament constituency).
This would also make it much easier to link the articles about the Fulham, Hammersmith, Kensington North and Kensington South constituencies backwards. Currently they end up here, to an article mainly devoted to the period when those consisted existed in parallell with Chelsea.
Any opposing views? Thomas Blomberg (talk) 14:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article should be split into two
Talk:Chesterfield (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Other editors have been describing him as a Labour MP from 1914-1929. This is incorrect.
Following his election in 1913 and throughout his parliamentary career until it ended in 1929, he took the Liberal whip in the House of Commons. The term 'Lib-Lab' could have been used for him and briefly was but the term went out of common usage after 1910. 
His description as 'Liberal' is consistently confirmed by editions of; Vacher's Parliamentary Companion, Dod's Parliamentary Companion, The Liberal Yearbook, The Constitutional Yearbook and Hazell's Annual.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Graemp (talk • contribs) 11:43, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barnet Kenyon 
Talk:Chesterton (UK Parliament constituency)

message: It seems impossible to believe that Bartlow was part of this constituency - it's deep in what was Linton Rural District and must surely have been in Newmarket (UK Parliament constituency)--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 14:11, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The map at http://visionofbritain.org.uk/unit/12754413/boundary doesn't show Bartlow in the constituency; Fen Drayton and Witcham Gravel were in according to the map but not in the list here. Peter James (talk) 17:37, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bartlow
Talk:Barrier board

message: This page needs a disambiguation note to distinguish the road marking from the material used to make commercial and archival storage containers.  It looks like the term 'barrier board' is applied to a composite board material that is composed of paper and thin layers of mineral or wood.  I'm actually not really sure what the stuff is or if there is more than one kind of material that the name is applied to.  Somebody look into it.  I'm busy. R0m23 (talk) 00:10, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation Needed
Talk:Republic of Lakotah proposal

message: A month or so ago, I could not read a single paragraph in this article without seeing mention of the Pine Ridge massacre inn the '70s. Now, it's not even mentioned in passing, and the entire page for the event itself seems to have disappeared. So my question is just what happened to this article and the mentions of the battle in Wikipedia? It seems a bit biased to leave out an event with significant influence to what's being discussed. Vandalism? Sea Captain Cormac 16:20, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The page for the incident hasn't gone; it's quite extensive, at Wounded Knee Occupation. Klbrain (talk) 09:07, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened? 

message: The Lakota Freedom Movement is a long-standing stub with no inline citations; it would be better merged with the heavily overlapping and broader article here. So, I support the September proposal. Klbrain (talk) 09:12, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: GenQuest "scribble" 15:11, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Is this a real flag of the Republic of Lakotah or the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation? Circesling (talk) 17:24, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Once again, it is a flag of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, and can be seen on their website. Remsense聊 17:36, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, The Republic of Lakotah is not a flag and it's not a proposed flag Circesling (talk) 17:54, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry, I don't understand the statement. Could you rephrase? Remsense聊 17:56, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, It's not a flag of the Republic of Lakotah, It's a flag of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, Circesling (talk) 14:40, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

text: @Remsense, I already did. Circesling (talk) 15:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Why are you posting these things and asking these questions? Remsense聊 15:07, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag of the Republic of Lakotah or the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation? 

message: @DaRealPrinceZuko, as you can see above there is no source in the article that establishes that the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation flag is used in this way, nor the "proposed" territorial boundaries. The burden is on you to provide a source before adding the material again. Cheers. Remsense诉 01:38, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The rest of the information is sourced in the article itself, so there was no need to erase the entire infobox and not just the flag. DaRealPrinceZuko (talk) 01:40, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag redux
Talk:Clacton (UK Parliament constituency)

message: This article is obviously never read. I sthere any chance that there could be some references cited?
:Sleepy places like Walton and Frinton are comfortable, if unexciting retirement havens.
The stark exception is the town of Jaywick, an area that suffers from extremely high levels of deprivation. Francis Hannaway (talk) 12:13, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's a hoot! 

message: Wasn't the 2015 General Election for Clacton a hold for UKIP?  The infobox says it was a gain from the Conservatives. (I'm a Yankee so maybe I'm missing something in how British elections work?) Foreignshore (talk) 04:58, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it should say held, the swings are not correct either.Halbared (talk) 12:02, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

text: It was a UKIP gain. Election results are always compared like-for-like, so by-election results are sort of discarded. doktorb wordsdeeds 18:52, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  2015 election result 
Talk:Cleethorpes (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Is this section still relevant? It appears to be dated before 2005. Crooked cottage (talk) 02:53, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Developments 
Talk:Clitheroe (UK Parliament constituency)

message: The 1873 obituary (transcript) for Robert Curzon, 14th Baron Zouche(younger) states that he took up the seat of Clitheroe in 1831.  This would indicate that his father, of the same name, held the seat for the earlier period, presumably until his death. -- billinghurst (talk) 14:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Robert Curzons 1796-1832

message: In this page his affiliation is shown as Conservative. 
On his own Wikipedia page he is given as a Liberal. Ucypanp (talk) 16:18, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Turner Hopwood
Talk:County Cork (UK Parliament constituency)

message: McCalmont's Parliamentary Poll Book (1971) (page 14) shows 
Col. D. La T. Colthurst (elected 1880) as a Home Ruler
Alekksandr  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alekksandr (talk • contribs) 14:28, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Croydon Central (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I propose merging Croydon South (historic UK Parliament constituency) into Croydon Central (UK Parliament constituency). The pre-1974 Croydon South seat was extremely similar to the subsequent Croydon Central seat (with minor adjustments for Ward Boundaries), provides important historical context for results in Croydon Central and better conforms with naming conventions for parliamentary constituencies with regards to Croydon South (historic) and a merge would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in Croydon Central (UK Parliament Constituency).Trimfrim20 (talk) 16:28, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Mirko Ilić

message: Listing a page for deletion one minute after it was created suggests there must be something extremely wrong, stupid and/or against the Wikipedia policy in there. Since I think this is not the case, I would really like to be informed about the reasons for this proposal.
--Vitriden (talk) 00:29, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion??? 
Talk:Darlington (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Why are the elections listed newest first, and then a separate section which starts oldest first ? -- Beardo (talk) 15:53, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of elections
Talk:Delyn (UK Parliament constituency)

message: She's recently married, and is now Jennifer Matthys- changing as a result. 
PS I'm not a BNP supporter- Lib Dem since 2005.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielspencer91 (talk • contribs) 18:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jennifer Griffin

message: The style guide for UK constituencies is pretty clear - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_UK_Parliament_constituencies/Style.
Not every election gets included just the first election that the MP is elected.
Thoughts?
Benawu2 (talk) 05:26, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elections
Talk:Lindeman's

message: Give us a chance, will ya, mate?
I've just started writing this. It is a well known winery, and I will add details and the needed context. There are already other wiki articles that link to this. Hadashot Livkarim (talk) 00:33, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion header
Talk:Dogtooth, North Dakota

message: Be careful with quoting from other websites, even if the text is yours.  the bots will tag them pretty quick, and they are good with copyvio's.  Pharmboy (talk) 00:33, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Devizes (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Southmartin continually removes the reference from Martin Houlden, instead converting it into a direct HTML link which is contrary to Wikipedia:Mos#External links. I have formatted the refernce correctly and left two warnings on Southmartin's talk page. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 15:20, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I am happy to support you. Moonraker2 (talk) 22:30, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit warring
Talk:Droitwich (UK Parliament constituency)

message: at the end of the 17th century Philip Foley and his relative Thomas Foley are both described as Tories, but Philip Foley is marked earlier a country whig.  While the country whigs allied themselves with the Tories, is it correct to describe them as Tories?   Peterkingiron (talk) 17:29, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tory/Country Whig
Talk:Plateau Station

message: At 
http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/mensch/antarktis-forscher-besuchen-eine-seit-50-jahren-verlassene-station-a-1140427.html
can be found new pictures from the station, made by members of the CoFi (Coldest firn meterology expedition). Somebody should at that to the article, maybe? polp  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polpott (talk • contribs) 11:45, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Infos
Talk:Dublin Clontarf (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Politics
In relation to the politics section Clontarf was described as a "strongly republican area" due to the result in 1 out of 40 General Elections. I have researched thoroughly on the Politics of Clontarf (Masters Thesis) and Clontarf was most certainly a "Republican" area, the opposite in fact. Clontarf had amongst the highest Protestant populations in Dublin (around 70%) up to the 30's and traditionally voted for mildly nationalist/unionist candidates. Clontarf had amongst the highest (per pop) signatures on the Ulster Covenant, and a good volunteering rate to HM Armed Forces so could not have been considered a Republican Area, never has been and to this day has NO Republican elected reps. I will write a detailed Politics section when i get the time.
Sources: CSO
Church of Ireland
Great War Roll of Honour
NI Government Archive (Ulster Covenant)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.71.77.165 (talk) 22:31, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:New Commandment

message: *I've started this article, which was listed as needed at WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles, and hope to expand soon with sourced writings on the subject. JGHowes talk -  00:39, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Glad to hear it. I've been tied down with other projects and never got back to this one as I'd hoped. JGHowes talk -  19:58, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Almost 4 years later, time to really improve it... It is a key topic in the project and needs to be better than this... History2007 (talk) 15:20, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvement