Talk:Royal Norwegian Navy

message: Some history would be good; I came here from the Krag-Petersson article (currently on the front page) because I'd seen that the RNN adopted the rifle in 1876, but as far as I can tell there's nothing at all about the 19th-century RNN. Loganberry (Talk) 22:44, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is the RNoN official web page for history. This page has a day by day history of the RNoN from 1814 to 2005. They are unfortunately both in Norwegian. Inge 17:21, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *PT boat Patrol Torpedo Boat
*Torpedo boat
*Missile boat
*Motor torpedo boat MTB
*Patrol boat and Fast Patrol Boat FPB
*Gun boat
*Missile torpedo boat MTB
*Gun torpedo boat Norwegian KTB
*E-boat
*PTF boat
Just a collection of labels that are available for these boatsInge 16:10, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Torpedo boat, Motor torpedo boat, Missile boat, Missile torpedo boat...

message: OK the list was getting a bit too big :), but the schools and present ships still belong in this article.Inge 21:07, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of ships 

message: No to a merger. Separate pages for each branch works very good. The Navy article needs to stay separate. Inge 22:21, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All such comments should be at: Talk:Norwegian Defence Force —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 15:09, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: KNM stands for "Kongelig Norsk Marine". If it were to stand for "Kongelige Norske Marine" one would have to add "Den" in front. "Kongelig Norsk Marine" means Royal Norwegian Navy, "Den Kongelige Norske Marine" means The Royal Norwegian Navy.Inge 14:45, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is very difficult to find references to this on internet, because KNM is almost never written in its full form. It is just one of those things you are supposed to know I guess. Googling will get you 28 hits on Kongelig Norsk Marine and 437 for Kongelige Norske Marine, that is because Den Kongelige Norske Marine is the definite form. But in the pamphlet Fakta om Forsvaret 2006 issued by the Ministry of Defense -7 KNM is explained as standing for Kongelig Norsk Marine. Also an article explaining. Inge 19:41, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  KNM 

message: This year's pamphlet "Fakta om Forsvaret" (Facts about the Defense) has arrived. I will try to update as much as I can according to it.Inge 12:11, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Facts about the Defense" 

message: We normally substitute KNM with HNoMS when we name Norwegian naval ships in English. This does not apply to the two schools named after former ships. KNM Harald Haarfagre is translated Royal Norwegian Naval Basic Training Establishment, and KNM Tordenskjold is translated Royal Norwegian Naval Training Establishment. It's not a biggie, but these are the offical translations. Inge 10:41, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  KNM Tordenskjold and KNM Harald Haarfagre 

message: Since "KV" stands for Kongelig Vaktjeneste (Kongelig means Royal), shouldn't then the English version be Royal Norwegian Coast Guard, not Norwegian Coast Guard?
Manxruler 13:28, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was under the impression that KV simply stood for Kystvakt ("coast guard"). -- Nidator 15:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  KV 

message: It would greatly surprise me if the RNoN got two LPDs. As I understand it the two logistics ships that are planned is an AOR and a ro-ro vessel. -- Nidator 15:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two LPDs?! 

message: Why do all the links to different submarine classes link to the same page? Would it not be better to show a red link?Marcusroos (talk) 19:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would think so, yes. The present order is poor. Manxruler (talk) 22:47, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Submarine links 

message: I have added the Cold war and the War on Terror to the list of engadgments. I beleve it is appropriate. Mortyman (talk) 03:15, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure is. The RNoN is taking part in the GWoT, and was highly active during the Cold War.Manxruler (talk) 03:34, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wars

message: I see the passage about being based in Britain during the war, but on the waterfront in Halifax, Nova Scotia there's a memorial to the crew of teh RNN and the Norwegian Merchant Marine who were based out of Halifax during World War II.  I'll take a picture of the monument and post it here, and also will ask in the Maritime Museum of the Atlantic, which it's next to, for further information.Skookum1 (talk) 15:57, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: WWII exile in Halifax NS

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Royal Norwegian Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070621143947/http://www.dep.no/filarkiv/281840/Fakta_Engelsk_2006.pdf to http://www.dep.no/filarkiv/281840/Fakta_Engelsk_2006.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:38, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Royal Norwegian Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120116160909/http://mil.no:80/organisation/equipmentfacts/sea/Pages/default.aspx to http://mil.no/organisation/equipmentfacts/sea/Pages/default.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Royal Norwegian Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.mil.no/sjo
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051111074546/http://www.mil.no/languages/english/start/facts/navy/ to http://www.mil.no/languages/english/start/facts/navy/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060219132752/http://www.dinesider.no/customer/002956/archive/files/befalsbladet/bb104.pdf to http://www.dinesider.no/customer/002956/archive/files/befalsbladet/bb104.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051214222224/http://www.mil.no/sjo/start/fakta/historie/ to http://www.mil.no/sjo/start/fakta/historie/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051101170315/http://www.mil.no/sjo/start/fakta/historie/dagfordag/ to http://www.mil.no/sjo/start/fakta/historie/dagfordag/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051122025507/http://www.fmu.mil.no/marine/Marinemuseet.htm to http://www.fmu.mil.no/marine/Marinemuseet.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051216220743/http://www.mil.no/felles/mmu/start/ to http://www.mil.no/felles/mmu/start/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:47, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified