lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Robert Douglas Genn

message: http://www.mayberryfineart.com 
Mayberry Fine Art in Winnipeg displays 25 of his paintings and gives a brief bio of Robert Genn, including descriptions of his techniques and comparisons to the 'Group of 7', which originally consisted of Franklin Carmichael, Lawren Harris, A. Y. Jackson, Frank Johnston, Arthur Lismer, J. E. H. MacDonald, and Frederick Varley... for each of which we have our own article.
Mayberry Fine Art says:
 Oh no it doesn't. You mean Canada House Gallery, which I have inserted below. Tyrenius 03:18, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the scrutiny and diligence, Tyrenius.  You deserve a barnstar and a barn to put it on. User:Pedant 06:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mayberry

message: http://www.canadahouse.com
:Robert Genn's work has become well known internationally as he is recognized as one of Canada's most accomplished painters. His manner of portraying subjects along Canada’s West Coast has received acclaim in North America and throughout the world. Robert Genn has painted in most parts of Canada as well as in South America, the U.S.A., Europe and the Orient.
:Robert Genn works mainly in acrylic paint on canvas. He likes to put his own stamp on nature’s grand themes. His techniques include a tradition of strong design: harmonic patterns and colour arrangements that poignantly capture the essence of the composition. His personal style is unmistakable, as grand themes are often translated and transformed into small panels in a manner reminiscent of several of the “Group of Seven” members. Although the influence of this group and their contemporaries is evident in his paintings, Robert has successfully extended many of their techniques as he produces images that are distinctively refreshing in design and colour.
:Robert Genn’s autobiographical book “In Praise of Painting” provides a rare opportunity to obtain insight on the early progress of a Canadian painter. His paintings can be found in major collections throughout North America and Europe."
:Collections
Glenbow Museum, Calgary, AB
Shell Oil
Government of Belguim
:Education
1957 University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
1957 Art Centre School, Los Angeles, CA
1956 Victoria College, Victoria, BC
1953 Victoria College, Victoria, BC
1947 Watercolour lessons with Will Menlaws
1945 Saturday morning art classes with John Lidstone
:Exhibitions
2006 Surrey Art Gallery
2006 Solo Exhibiton, Canada House Gallery, Banff, AB
:Publications
2003 The Painters' Keys: A Seminar with Robert Genn
1981 In Praise of Painting''
User:Pedant 01:33, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Canada House Gallery
Talk:Marlin Model 1894

message: To conform with Wikipedia's manual of style, the lead sentence should give a very brief description of what the subject is, something like, "The Marlin Model 1894 is…" I would edit this myself but I don't know enough about the subject to give a definition and I leave it up to the regular editors of this article to do this. Just a suggestion! Otherwise, the article looks very informative. —Malber (talk • contribs • game) 18:48, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: EDIT: I've added a lead, but an editor with more experience about the subject may want to improve it. —Malber (talk • contribs • game) 18:52, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks great to me.  —Thernlund (Talk | Contribs) 20:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Correction... Jeff tidyed it up to what I just saw.  But your was a good start.  ;-)  —Thernlund (Talk | Contribs) 20:22, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:MOS]] for lead 

message: The article tell nothing about the powerfull caliber .444 Marlin. This factory produces a riflein caliber .444 Marlin since more than 40 years ago.Agre22 (talk) 01:06, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caliber .444 Marlin has no place

message: The CST variant really needs to be added to the article. --Surv1v4l1st ╠Talk║Contribs╣ 04:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CST 

message: Maybe someone can look into it and find some info about the 1894CS model.  It's not listed on the page.  There's the CSS model, but not CS.  Mine is an 1894CS (quite clearly marked).  I bought it, new, in 1996, so it WAY predates the Remington buyout. 108.254.140.120 (talk) 03:31, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1894CS model
Talk:Bosnia and Herzegovina in the Middle Ages

message: I don't see how Denis Basic is any expert on medieval Bosnia. He claims that "Porphyrogenitus does not say anywhere explicitly that Bosnia is a Serb land", when in fact, Porphyrogenitus states that Bosnia is a "small/little land" part of Serbia, and referred to it only once, at the end of the 32nd chapter on the Serbs.
--Zoupan 04:00, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Non-experts
Talk:.264 Winchester Magnum

message: Under 'Performance', is this a commercial for Double Tap Ammo??? Plus Double Tap states velocities that they never meet by actual Chronographs. Msjayhawk (talk) 01:23, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement?? 
Talk:E (disambiguation)

message: e (text editor) is here: .  Are there others?
--Gtcaz 01:06, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

message: There are a bunch of entries that were just merged here out of E. I think E is a better place for them, but I was curious what others had to say. - grubber 16:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, other than information directly related to how the symbols "E" and "e" serve as a letter of the alphabet, all other meanings should be kept on this disambiguation page.  This is consistent with the other latin letters, and helps to reduce clutter on the main E page. - Dmeranda (talk) 17:28, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Merge from [[E]] 

message: I would have thought E for the drug Ecstasy was very common usage?
 SmokeyTheCat  •TALK• 08:06, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's at E (disambiguation)#Other usage. Your browser probably has a search function for the viewed page, maybe +. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:10, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What, no Ecstasy? 

message: * Letter E is used for European roads in one hand and for expressways in some countries in the other hand. 
* E numbers are also codes for substances that are permitted to be used as food additives for use within the European Union and Switzerland. (The "E" stands for "Europe". Commonly found on food labels, their safety assessment and approval are the responsibility of the European Food Safety Authority.)
Anyway, with the Brexit we do not know if British food will continue to be submitted to the European union authority numbering, but anyway, the european union might be rather notable for the E number be considered as an entry in this page.
The international E-road network is a numbering system for roads in Europe developed by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE).
For this reason I suggest addition of those topic in the E page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.67.188.213 (talk) 11:05, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  E road and E additives ([[E number]])
Talk:Hayer affidavits

message: The articles Hayer affidavits, Talmadge Hayer, Norman 3X Butler and Thomas 15X Johnson are all stubs.  If they aren't expanded, there's no reason why they shouldn't be replaced with a redirect to Malcolm X#Assassination, which could take in anything covered in these 4 articles but not there.The Monster 01:10, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to Malcolm X#Assassination

message: Similar to the above proposal, I propose that the four articles be merged. But instead of merging them into Malcolm X, which is already very long, I propose:
* Merging the four articles here
* Adding some context from Malcolm X#Assassination
* Renaming this article Assassination of Malcolm X or Assassins of Malcolm X or something similar
We could also include, and expand, some of the material in Malcolm X#Conspiracy theories.
What do others think? — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 03:43, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In addition, I'd merge in Leon David and Wilbur McKinley, two of the men accused in the Hayer affidavits. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 04:17, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a good idea to merge the articles, including the two men above. Renaming it as you suggested would allow you to incorporate what you need.--Parkwells (talk) 16:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Talmadge Hayer

message: The articles Hayer affidavits, Talmadge Hayer, Norman 3X Butler and Thomas 15X Johnson are all stubs.  If they aren't expanded, there's no reason why they shouldn't be replaced with a redirect to Malcolm X#Assassination, which could take in anything covered in these 4 articles but not there.The Monster 01:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to Malcolm X#Assassination

message: Is Talmadge Hayer an alias of Thomas Hagan or vice versa?  The Hayer affidavits in Wikisource appear to have been made by a Thomas Hagan...? - Mark Dixon 18:13, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alias?

message: I have no information for this article.  I was just looking up Malcolm X for informational purposes and I can't get any information on his assassins.  Edit: sorry, i have since found on Wikipedia that the other two are paroled.  But what happened to the man himself, Talmadge?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.161.73.121 (talk) 05:21, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Parole/Death?
Talk:Norman 3X Butler

message: The articles Hayer affidavits, Talmadge Hayer, Norman 3X Butler and Thomas 15X Johnson are all stubs.  If they aren't expanded, there's no reason why they shouldn't be replaced with a redirect to Malcolm X#Assassination, which could take in anything covered in these 4 articles but not there.The Monster 01:14, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to Malcolm X#Assassination
Talk:Anthony Salz

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 20:12, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Lover (clothing)

message: There's perhaps some commercial bias in the fact that a search for "Lover" directs one to this page. I'd suggest pointing "Lover" directly to the disambiguation page, and renaming the entry about the fashion laber "Lover (fashion label)". Any objections? Spiky 01:18, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nagel point

message: Who's Nagel?  How 'bout a link to his article? Michael Hardy 01:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm afraid the jstor link for the theorem that the incenter of a triangle is the Nagel point of its medial triangle is dead due to changes at jstor.  An update by someone who knows what s/he's doing would be great.  Thanks.
70.243.136.105 (talk) 02:56, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:14, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  jstor link is dead 

message: I propose Splitter (geometry) be merged into this page, and turned into a redirect. A more complete article can be formed from their combination.
67.252.103.23 (talk) 00:00, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems reasonable to me. Otherwise, the splitter article seems likely to be a permanent stub — there doesn't seem to be a lot to say about them. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:16, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Miao, Arunachal Pradesh

message: According to the article Nanman, the Miao is also the name of an ethnic group or similar. Maybe this page should be a disambig page. // Konvalj 01:27, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Crum375

message: Crum375's edit stats using wannabe Kate tool as of 01:28, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

message: I would like to extend my profound thanks to all the editors who participated in my just-concluded RfA, which ended with a final vote of 88/4/1.
I am still overwhelmed by the near unanimous support and the many flattering and humbling remarks I received. I did not expect the RfA to be such an emotional event for me – seeing all those supportive messages has given me a new appreciation of the uniqueness of the Wiki experience, and as I noted in my "A9" message, just these kind comments alone, more than justify my personal investment so far in the project.
I look forward to continuing my tiny part in helping Wikipedia get ever closer to our common vision of a well written, well sourced, neutrally presented, high quality encyclopedia, a collection of mankind's and womankind's knowledge, freely available to all.
I again thank the community for its vote of confidence, and will do my best to live up to it. Crum375 02:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  My RfA
Talk:Harbourmaster

message: Reading the article you'd think this were some obscure English tradition when it's a common international occupation. At least in the US this is a significant job and needs a lot more information.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:1480:46EE:8C4F:9A91:4BA2:F231 (talk) 15:44, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs Work

message: In the United States the spelling is Harbormaster not Harbourmaster.  It is Wikipedia convention to use the spelling that is proper for the region.  It is improper to use Harbourmaster when describing the American profession.
:If harbourmasters only existed in the United States then it would be appropriate to use the American spelling for the whole article. Since the post exists everywhere the spelling should be consistent throughout the article. Therefore, since the article was started in British English it should continue to be in British English throughout unless it refers to a proper name (e.g. Queen's Harbourmaster), in which case the spelling used in the appropriate country should obviously be used. Spelling should not be changed halfway through an article. This is quite clearly stated in the Manual of Style. -- Necrothesp 13:14, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: The redirect Chief harbourmaster has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 21:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Chief harbourmaster]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Miracle at Philadelphia

message: Factual accuracy issues. 'Novel' may be an incorrect designation. 'Semi-fictional' also seems unwarranted. Bowen presents the events as factual and there is no reason to believe any of it is fabricated. Calaf 01:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I read this book and I recall the introduction did say it is semi-fictional. Some other editors added the "novel" part, I might try to check out the book from library again and check. Wooyi 01:57, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Justice Society of America

message: Is the Justice League Cartoon really a Justice Society cartoon? 66.109.248.114 23:15, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That doesn't make it a JSA cartoon. 66.109.248.114 20:16, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Eggs go into a chocolate cake, that doesn't make it an omellete. 66.109.248.114 23:53, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Justice League Cartoon

message: So I've been thinking...maybe we should reduce the size of the template by removing the members section entirely for the sake of brevity (like the Avengers templates over at the Marvel side), and just leave in the canon founding members, pre and post Flashpoint, which will leave us with eight entries in total. Anyway, the "members" section is a hotlink to the "list of Justice Society members" page and it can go as long as it could be deemed reasonable. Haleth (talk) 17:11, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Trimming the template
Talk:Firefly (2005 film)

message: Firefly is the TV show - the Movie is Serenity - right?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.121.219.228 (talk) 14:21, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Firefly is the name of a TV show. This is an entirely different independent film that incidentally shares a title with the show. Failureboy1 (talk) 22:37, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Hyperbolic triangle

message: picture?
:Done. Gandalf61 08:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The hyperbolic triangle for the section Euclidean geometry is a right triangle with hypothenuse being the radius from the origin to a point on the hyperbola y = 1/x . Thus it shares two sides with the hyperbolic sector currently displayed. In fact, the angle at the origin of the hyperbolic sector is the same "hyperbolic angle" φ used to determine cosh φ and sinh φ. Dropping the perpendicular to y = x from  the point on the hyperbola makes the two legs of the right triangle. Note that the diagram at hyperbolic functions has φ/2 for angle magnitude. That is a "normalized diagram" since the legs of the right triangle are just the hyperbolic functions cosh φ and sinh φ. The diagram here uses a hyperbola with minimum distance to the origin √2. The angle is not divided by two, but the legs are scaled up by √2. Remember that for a circle, a radius of √2 is necessary for sector area to equal arc length. So the confusing √2 and /2 really are consistent with circular practice.Rgdboer (talk) 20:09, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much for clarifying my confusion - I think I have the right idea now but there are still errors in the newest version, I'll fix them now. Maschen (talk) 21:14, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - better? Maschen (talk) 21:25, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

text: Yes, that provides the requisite triangle. Very good caption too. Including the hyperbolic sector provides useful context. Note that the value of u is well away from zero so the triangle begins to approach the isosceles shape since sinh and cosh get closer (tanh goes to one).Rgdboer (talk) 23:12, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, although the caption I wrote is a mouthful, but it had to explain everything... Thanks for inserting the √2 also! Maschen (talk) 07:23, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture?

message: The names a, b, c, A, B, C are used but not defined anywhere. They might be standard names, but at least a graphic which shows them would be a nice thing. 193.175.95.251 (talk) 13:53, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Namings

message: i would like to reach a consencus on adding an "occurrences in nature" section in which some examples of hyperbolic triangles in the natural world are listed.
any opinions?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RJJ4y7 (talk • contribs) 16:38, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The natural world does not have the geometry of the hyperbolic plane or hyperbolic space. Therefore, hyperbolic triangles cannot appear in it. You must be thinking of some other kind of triangle that resembles in some way a hyperbolic triangle but is not actually hyperbolic. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:12, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  discussion on a new section to the article
Talk:Pedigree Petfoods

message: "The company makes the market leaders Pedigree Chum..." Chum??? Isn't that fish guts they feed to sharks???
:I think it's just generic "bits of meat" they feed to sharks. The dog food did used to be called Pedigree Chum but i think they changed the name, wouldn't know, not owning a dog. Oh and also Chum is an old-fashioned British word for "Friend", though it went out of use decades ago, except as a joke 82.153.230.130 18:33, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chum

message: I came here to find info on the U.S. class action lawsuit against Pedigree. Apparently Pedigree blended road kill and dead lab animal with their collars still on (including dogs) in their wet food. That seemed to have killed many dogs. I think mine was one of them. I still have more than half of the case of Pedigree canned food as my dog got sick fairly quickly. Anyone have any info?70.79.50.5 (talk) 04:00, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. Class Action Lawsuit Against Pedigree

message: Someone redirected Kal Kan to Whiskas. I decided to investigate and things are much more confusing than that. I don't know if, using Wikipedia guidelines, this can ever be resolved.— Vchimpanzee •  talk • contributions •  20:37, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: And now it's even more of a mess. Alfonso Ribeiro is showing me and what I did. Bad! Bad!— Vchimpanzee •  talk • contributions •  20:49, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone really needs to follow me around with a shovel or a plastic bag. But they need to go into ALL the related articles.— Vchimpanzee •  talk • contributions •  21:51, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not much better but someone suggested I use Funding Universe's history of Kal Kan as a source. Take a look at User:Vchimpanzee/Kal Kan Foods. It's possible a lot of that can be used here. Some might work better in the Whiskas article. I am concerned I haven't done enough to change to wording, but it's not technically a copyright problem. I'm just asking for suggestions right now. Someone could even look at the source and see what else could be added and how.— Vchimpanzee •  talk • contributions •  17:22, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What a mess
Talk:Yoshihiko Funazaki

message: Please merge any relevant content from [ Picasso-kun no tantei note] per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Picasso-kun no tantei note.   (If there is nothing to merge, just leave it as a redirect.)  Thanks. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-14 01:50Z
Done, thanks. --1523 04:44, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Picasso-kun no tantei note]]
Talk:Sound Blaster 16

message: This image is not appropiate for the content. I have seen several cards and there are a lot of kinds of SB16; SOME OF THEM TWICE AS LONG AS THE ONE IN THE PICTURE.
:This is a late model SB16. That's a scan of my card. I don't own any of the older SB16s, unfortunately. Yes, I fully realize the older models were huge. Most of the SB card scans here are mine. :) --Swaaye 04:02, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Human Giant

message: When and what time will the show be on?--Iownatv 01:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

message: I've been over-ridden (angrily no less) for simply correcting things on a wiki page that i knew were wrong - but has anybody heard the remix version of Romantic Rights that is claimed to be the one used as the intro theme and realised that it's nothing like the version they use on the show?
I can not believe that the version used on the show is the remix. It is, in fact a shortened version of the album track. Can someone in charge of the page check it out and change this info? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.139.52 (talk • contribs) 12:49, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remix version of Romantic Rights NOT the theme song for Human Giant?