lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Parents Television Council controversies

message: Where can we send hate mail polite criticism to the PTC? Preferably of the digital kind, as some of us have stopped using sheets of cellulose to communicate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.21.221 (talk) 23:38, August 27, 2007 (UTC) 
:I dunno, nor do I want to, though I thought it was rather ridiculous that they would freak out about Spongebob Squarepants, among all things. South Park is okay, but, come on, SPONGEBOB?!--Imhungry 23:58, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please sign your comments, bub.--Threedots dead (talk) 11:53, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polite Criticism 

message: Please stop removing the following information:
Brent Bozell also claimed in one of his weekly columns that "When a show can win both a Family Television Award and a Media Award from the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, as Ugly Betty has, you know there’s something wrong".
''
Brent Bozell is the founder of the PTC and this material was linked to from their website. As such, it is appropriate for it to be included in this article.
59.101.158.101 (talk) 06:56, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this because you think that it represents that PTC is homophobic? I think for the most part there should be more in that section regarding others who have called PTC anti-gay or such, not just your own synthesis of Bozell's own words.--Andrewlp1991 (talk) 05:42, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Also here's a good link criticizing the PTC for anti-gay views. I'll add that soon.-Andrewlp1991 (talk) 05:44, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding homophobia section 

message: It looks like all of the links to the PTC website point to pages that no longer exist.  If anyone can find archived/cached versions, the links should be updated.  75.185.161.15 (talk) 20:42, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Links
Talk:Sumiteru Taniguchi

message: There is no evidence that Joe O'Donnell shot this photograph and it is highly unlikely that he did. O'Donnell for at least 20 years claimed credit for many photographs he did not shoot -- from portraits of Truman to Jackie Kennedy, JFK and many others. He claimed to have photographed Lyndon Johnson's swearing in on Air Force 1 although the sole photographer present was Capt. Cecil Stoughton, an Army photographer assigned full time to the JFK White House.  O'Donnell claimed credit for photographs shot by famous photographers and more anonymous ones, but in the case of the latter their names were recorded. O'Donnell has been throughly debunked, including evidence that he falsely claimed credit for photographs from Japan. This is one of them and it is beyond plausibility that O'Donnell made it. His book on Japan 1945 is a historical falsehood and it is impossible to determine when or where some of the photographs were made. And there is ample evidence that O;Donnell made false statements.
69.120.49.117 22:37, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is plenty of evidence that O'Donnell took this snapshot, please read over the citations provided before making such claims. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 21:14, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article as currently written DOES appear to be from someone other than O'Donnell. Per the article, the lead (and only) image is from a color film reel, and whatever photograph you both are referring to should instead be in black-and-white. Yet, the description under the image attributes it to O'Donnell. Unless the photograph was colorized, it appears the photo's description is incorrect or outdated. 68.60.202.174 (talk) 04:25, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Devil's Due (Star Trek: The Next Generation)

message: This is somewhat true from the perspective of the natives. Although they understand what advanced technology is and they never mistake the Enterprise or what its crew can bring about for magic, they somehow do appear to accept similar phenomena as truly magical when performed by Ardra (who is must be said really knows how to sell it). Picard of course immediately sees the bag of tricks for what it is, and as equivalent to what his tech can readily reproduce. Still, if you are entirely comfortable with Starfleet personnel materialising in your room, would you be that impressed by Ardra? 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:4D54:20CC:FEF8:36EF (talk) 20:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This episode illustrates Arthur C. Clarke's Third Law: "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."[2]
Talk:Ralph M. Holman

message: is it worth mentioning he wrote the opinion in Portland section of the Council of Jewish WOmen v Sisters of Charity of Providence in Oregon 266 Or. 448 513 P.2d 1183.
It's considered a good illustration  of impractibility in contract law.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patbahn (talk • contribs) 04:41, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Council of Jewish Women v Sisters of Charity
Talk:Galaxy's Child

message: Towards the end of the episode, after saying "If we're gradual enough, it won't be such a shock. Hopefully, it'll just lose interest." La Forge goes to tap his communicator badge, but barely touches it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.110.180.141 (talk) 19:53, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Bloopers are generally not included in these articles unless there is notable coverage in other media that makes them significant to discussion and reception of the episode. Dunarc (talk) 20:08, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blooper 

message: Some of the see also here seems to be a bit odd/contrived. I can see that there could be seen to be similarities between developments in this episode and Tin Man, but  the relevance to some of the other episodes just because they feature 'offspring' of machines is rather more tenuous. Moreover, the inclusion of  B'Elanna Torres on the ground 'This Star Trek: Voyager character has a pregnancy' seems rather random. It is not as if Torres is the only Star Trek character ever to be pregnant/give birth (for example Keiko O'Brien, and significantly Major Kira in DS9 had a notable pregnancy) and it is not clear that there is any relevance between Torres' pregnancy and the Enterprise helping to deliver the offspring of a space creature. Also I note that Galaxy's Child was itself in the see also. I have removed this as there is no way the same article can be referred to in see also. Dunarc (talk) 20:18, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also
Talk:Transvision Vamp

message: www.transvisionvamp.com does not seem to be the band's official site, despite the domain it uses. Is there a statement from the band (or the band name's owner) endorsing this site? If the site indeed is not official, then it should not go in the infobox. --maf (talk-cont) 19:09, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Official website?

message: Why the glut of information on their performance in Australia? Nothing in the article suggests any particular Antipodean connection.193.82.198.157 (talk) 09:47, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Australia?
Talk:Half a Life (Star Trek: The Next Generation)

message: Sadly I don't have the Nielsen ratings for this episode. The source I normally use is blank for this specific episode, so I can't add them. If anyone knows of the relevant details, then please add it to the article under reception. If you don't know how to format the citation or you're new to Wiki, then get in touch with me and I'll do it on your behalf. Thanks! Miyagawa (talk) 23:32, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ratings
Talk:Judith Merkle Riley

message: Her uncle-abue was the famous baseman Fred Merkle.
What on earth is an uncle-abue? Jsjoberg 01:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wouldn't that merely be "great-uncle" ? 63.201.26.195 (talk) 20:31, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  uncle-abue 

message: Her uncle-abue is the brother of her grandfather. 
--E-romance (talk) 12:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wouldn't that merely be "great-uncle" ? 63.201.26.195 (talk) 20:31, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: uncle-abue
Talk:The Mind's Eye (Star Trek: The Next Generation)

message: Is it Kel or Kell? --Againme (talk) 05:23, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two spellings 

message: Is not played by Denise Crosby here, only voiced by her. The figure in the shadows meant to portray Sela is actually longtime TNG photo stand-in Debra Dilley, although finding a non-fan-edited source is proving difficult. Blaze Infernus (talk) 00:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sela
Talk:Kathleen McCartney (academic)

message: Ironman 1982 Winner?
The Ironman_Triathlon article links to this page when it mentions the 1982 winner.  Yet this article doesn't even mention this otherwise relevant fact. Maybe this is not the same person? Wikihonduras 19:23, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the subject of this article is not the Ironman winner. I've altered the Ironman Triathlon article accordingly. --NSH001 17:13, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: New page for Sarah Willie-LeBreton and significant edits to this page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.229.196.45 (talk) 16:39, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: New President
Talk:Delaware Supreme Court

message: So right off, the first sentence is wrong. The Supreme Court is appellate to the Superior Court, but the Superior Court is both a court of original jurisdiction and appellate to Court of Common Pleas cases and the first appeal from most agencies, boards, and commissions. I think in some situations a JP case might be appealed to Superior, but I'm not sure. Also, I think Gebhart v. Belton and Gebhart v. Bulah should be mentioned in the notable cases section. They were consolidated into Brown v. Board, but they were the only two cases where the lower court (Delaware Chancery) had ruled segregation to be unconstitutional even before the U.S. Supreme Court said so; the State (Gebhart) had actually lost below.
But I don't know how to Wiki.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.109.7.33 (talk) 04:06, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rules of Decision Act

message: The last paragraph states:
This statement seems plausible, but I don't think this citation supports it. 28 USC § 1338 is about "patents, plant variety protection, copyrights and trademarks" which it defines to be issues of original federal jurisdiction. This explicitly excludes state law, which is what the Rules of Decision Act is about. Moreover the cited subsection (a), which contains this definition, restricts its scope to "this subsection". Hairy Dude (talk) 00:38, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cited definition of "state" is an irrelevant law
Talk:Electric Cloud

message: Why delete this? Ousterhout is notable. Maybe merge to article about him. --Amir E. Aharoni 06:54, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why delete? 

message: Beyond the explanation of "Electric Accelerator" and "Electric Deploy", the rest of the products use buzz words that leave more questions than answers.
Enterprise-grade does not have a very well defined meaning, and adds nothing to the definition. It only says it's for a large number of users, how large are we talking about though? I think you can remove this term and still keep the meaning of the definition intact.
It has a model-driven approach, that's good, but so does every other software. What is its model? How does it differentiate itself compared to the others? Teams can coordinate predictably? How? It's auditable? How? Why aren't other approaches auditable?
How does it transform processes? How is it different than other related softwares?
If someone knows what the software listed here does, you can improve the article by clarifying it, and cut out some of the marketing talk that tells us nothing. Thank you. ChthonicOne (talk) 16:42, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Product section needs work 
Talk:Zoltán Ozoray Schenker

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.jewsinsports.org/Olympics.asp?sport=olympics&ID=199. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 18:23, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:New Ground (Star Trek: The Next Generation)

message: Worf's mother makes the statement that she is aging but that she isn't ready for the grave yet. Georgia Brown, the actress playing her, appears to have died 7 months later. Strange coincidence 2601:5CA:180:1AF0:E92E:7EB1:2A4:CC04 (talk) 01:08, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dark trivia
Talk:Cloverdale Transit

message: There is no such agency as Cloverdale Transit. Transit service in Cloverdale is provided by Sonoma County Transit. See http://sctransit.com/SchedulesampMaps/CurrentSchedules/Local68.aspx  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.36.187.47 (talk) 18:26, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Ethics (Star Trek: The Next Generation)

message: the article states that it is quadriplegia that Worf suffers from but he is able to move his arms throughout the episode, and in the only scene he does not move his arms he states "I am unable to move my legs" after trying to move them. I believe it is not quadriplegia but paraplegia (unable to move the legs but able to use his arms).Fegor 19:48, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  quadriplegia
Talk:Apple River Fort

message: I added a bit about the closing. I don't think it's appropriate Wikiquette but I can get away with it. I just wanted to say this is an absolute travesty, this, and the other closings. The whole region suffers because of our arrogant governor. Pft!
To the woman who operated the site, whom I had the pleasure to meet on my visit in late April, (and I don't know if you read this site--I know you hate it! haha) but thank you, and I am so sorry. Hopefully someone in our government has brains and this nonsense will be over before you know it. --IvoShandor (talk) 15:28, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Closing
Talk:Prospect Hill Cemetery (Washington, D.C.)

message: NOTE REGARDING COPYRIGHT PERMISSIONSText on the Prospect Hill cemetery website has been released in to the public domain and is therefore freely available for use in this article - see foot of this page for statement "Materials and images on this website are released into the public domain" • nancy • 17:41, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

message: I am fairly new at this Wikipedia stuff.
I am the webmaster on the Prospect Hill Cemetery, Washington DC website and copied our material, History and photos, to Wikipedia. The problem I have is with the way of trying to find my way through Wikipedia.
For instance, once I upload an image I am really having a problem finding it again in case I failed to add the proper copyright tag (which I thought I did).
Second, I have placed questions on talk pages but can't figure out how to get a reply or find a possible answer.
I really do need help.
--Wenzela 20:08, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Concerning Prospect Hill Cemetery

message: Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites  or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following: 
:*If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
:*If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Prospect Hill Cemetery (Washington, DC) with a link to where we can find that note;
:*If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note  at Talk:Prospect Hill Cemetery (Washington, DC) with a link to the details.
Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement.  
It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you want to edit constructively, take a look at the welcome page. Thank you. --Wenzela 20:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright status of [[:Prospect Hill Cemetery (Washington, DC)]]
Talk:Internet censorship in Morocco

message: I know that Original Research is not acceptable, hence me not modifying the section. I have looked for verifiable sources, but the latest I can find dates back to 2007, which confirms the block on these sites. However, I think the situation has evolved. I use Maroc Telecom and have no problem accessing any of the sites whatsoever.AlexandrDmitri (talk) 02:19, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blocked sites in Morocco
Talk:San Joaquin Regional Transit District

message: Will anybody be updating the page to reflect the route restructure and renaming? - KenH.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:205:4101:284:69E5:6AE4:1399:CC90 (talk) 23:04, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  March 11th 2018 Route Restructure
Talk:Henry Street, Dublin

message: Henry Street/Mary Street/Moore Street have been pedestrianized for far longer than that.  I lived in Ireland from the mid-70s to early 80s and those streets were always pedestrianized.  They were paved with asphalt and had normal raised sidewalks (footpaths) paved with flagstones, but they were most definitely closed to traffic.  Please don't make Wikipedia a major stop on the disinformation superhighway so-called.
71.241.82.68 (talk) 06:15, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pedestrianized "since the 1980s"?

message: So Mary Street doesn't exist then...or at least you wouldn't have believed it reading this article. I've amended some of the more blatant errors, in the meantime, please familarise yourselves with the location of Mary Street here: . It runs from the junction of Henry Street and Liffey Street eastwards as far as Capel Street. The Jervis Centre is not and never was on Henry Street. Strictly speaking, neither for that matter is the Ilac Centre - one of the entrances is Mary Street and another is on a laneway off Henry Street between Debenhams and Dunnes.
But, maybe a good idea would be to move the article to Henry Street and Mary Street if people think a joint article is needed?--Rdd 20:10, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mary Street

message: Article says that H&M is womens only but it has reverted back to Mens & Women. Maybe one of the normal editor of this page can amend.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.206.1.20 (talk) 14:25, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  H&M 
Talk:List of islets of Caroline Island

message: It would be a good idea to add a column for coordinates, using . Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 20:15, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: not practical in the detail table, but I created a compact table to which the coordinates can be added more easily.--Ratzer (talk) 06:42, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates
Talk:Palden Lhamo

message: Vetali is also sometimes Mahakala's consort - not sure if this is an alternate name or a different personage. Sylvain1972 20:17, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vetali?

message: Why did she eat her son? MilkMan108 (talk) 15:12, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Palden Lhamo 

message: The first paragraph identifies Palden Lhamo with Remati then "...or Remati[3] is a protecting Dharmapala of the Gelug school of Tibetan Buddhism". This is ambiguous because it implies that Remati is only a protector of the Gelug school and of Tibet as a whole from the view of the Gelug school. But Remati isn't limited to the Gelug school, though as Palden Lhamo she might be -- of this I'm unsure, though I'm certain that Remati is a Darmapala also sometimes used in the Nyingma school. I haven't made changes because I can't source it well enough at the moment. This note is to remind me to return and clarify and/or to ask someone else to do so. DirkJeffreyJohnson (talk) 02:41, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing First Paragraph
Talk:List of North Sea ports

message: It would be a good idea to convert the list to a table, and add a column for coordinates, using . Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 20:19, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The table idea is wonderful, and add a column for citations and sources as unverified material can be removed.  Addition of one today.  (woo hoo! A trillion more to go.) SriMesh | talk 18:14, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates

message: Should Scapa Flow in the Orkneys be regarded as a port (or harbour) of the North Sea, and likewise would the scuttling of the German Fleet in 1919 in Gutter Sound be regarded as an event in the North Sea? While Scapa Flow and the Orkneys have the North Sea on one side, and the Atlantic Ocean on the other, shipwrecks in Scapa Flow are regarded as North Sea shipwrecks. Hugo999 (talk) 10:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Scapa Flow