Talk:Terence Young (politician)

message: We got a complaint from the subject of this article.
When stating classifications such as 'social conservative', contributors should attribute them to people or to groups of people. If this person is generally classified as a social conservative by most of the press, you should be able to find many citations saying so, from a wide variety of papers of different political biases. David.Monniaux 19:34, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I have just added this template. The Drug advocacy section seems to have repeated and redundant information that needs cleanup. And the same section as well as Federal politics section both read a bit too marketing like rather than encyclopedic. I will endeavour to improve on these issues in coming edits. I welcome anyone who might wish help so as to ensure a better outcome. --papageno (talk) 20:56, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have completed a major revision of the Drug advocacy section. User EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) has completed major revisions to the Provincial politics and to the Federal politics sections. The segments in the Federal politics section about marijuana previously added by Wikiwook96 (talk) need further review and polishing. However, I think the  template with Repetition and Peacock subtemplates can now be removed. --papageno (talk) 03:28, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Since there have been no objections raised in almost two months, I have removed the  and  templates and the enclosing  template, leaving only the  template. The matter is closed. --papageno (talk) 02:59, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Multiple issues template with Repetition and Peacock subtemplates 

message: I have manually reverted three edits made by anonymous editor 24.226.121.43 (talk), an editor who has purported to be the subject of the article. The edits appear to be burnishing the article in his favour. If the edits continue, I will request the page be semi-protected. --papageno (talk) 03:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repeated edits by anonymous user purporting to be the subject of the article  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Terence Young (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150119204514/http://results.elections.on.ca/results/1995_results/valid_votes.jsp?e_code=36&rec=0&district=halton+centre&flag=E&layout=G to http://results.elections.on.ca/results/1995_results/valid_votes.jsp?e_code=36&rec=0&district=halton+centre&flag=E&layout=G
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:10, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There have been a series of edits by an anonymous IP address user 24.226.97.221 (talk) likely to be Mr. Young or an insider. Whois shows the IP address still to be in the range of the cable internet provider, Cogeco, for the area where Mr. Young was MP and where he resides, and it is similar to IP addresses used previously by users purporting to be Mr. Young. The edits are again burnishing the article in Mr. Young's favour, contravening WP:NPOV, and adding unreferenced text. Given the suspicious nature, and past incidents and behaviours, any edits the user wishes to have made should be reviewed here in Talk first before they are published. Is there someone who can roll-back the edits wholesale? --papageno (talk) 03:11, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The rollback has been made by User:Bearcat (talk). --papageno (talk) 05:11, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repeated edits by anonymous user likely Mr. Young or an insider