lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Moon Child (2003 film)

message: This article is so bad. Someone take it away. Keep it to the fan sites please...- Sunawave
I agree. It's biased and includes many unneccesary things for an article —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.46.241.82 (talk • contribs) 
Wow this is not a very good artical at all.  It needs less colorful words as my english teacher would call them.  The point of view is awful.  It can be fixed but only by someone who wants too.  70.127.190.51 05:26, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I found :Image:4988105027022.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:07, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:4988105027022.jpg]]

message: :Image:4988105027022.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 05:07, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:4988105027022.jpg
Template talk:Defwarn

message: The pattern of bolded text makes this warning extremely hard to read.  To me, that also makes it hard to take seriously.  Would anyone object if we tone down the bolding?  A lot?  Rossami (talk) 01:31, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Format

message: Isn't this rather in conflict with Wikipedia:No legal threats? I have just encountered a content dispute that was escalated wildly by the use of this template. —Centrx→talk • 04:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It depends on how the template is used, and how the template worded it.  If it's used politely, then it wouldn't violate WP:LEGAL.  I personally prefer if such a disclaimer was added back in, even if it has to be toned down.  I use defwarn on anonymous users who vandalize Skutt Catholic High School only because it is most appropriate:  The subject of that article is known to sue such vandals.  Tuxide 05:26, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

text: edit:  The new defamatory templates (, , , , and ) resolve my issue.  Also, another note is that  is no longer listed on WP:UTM.  Regards, Tuxide 03:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No legal threats
Talk:My Life Without Me

message: I just finished reading Kincaid's book. I can't find a source stating this, but I believe the film was only based on the last story in the book (which is a collections of short stories) called Pretending the Bed is a Raft. I assume this confusion has come up based on the fact that the book itself has the same title. Granted, I can't find a source supporting what this article already claims, that the film is based on the (entire) book. Iamdooser (talk) 05:16, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, Kincaid's Wiki entry supports my claim, although a source is not cited: "The film My Life Without Me was based on the title story in Pretending the Bed Is a Raft." Iamdooser (talk) 05:20, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basis of story
Talk:Clawson, Michigan

message: Eric Lehr needs to be kept in this section.  He is a locally known vocalist and pageant performer within the city and has won several awards.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.38.117.174 (talk) 04:57, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous alumni 
Talk:National Security (2003 film)

message: This movie happened to be on TBS one night, so I absentmindedly searched for it on Wikipedia to reveal this overly elaborate and clumsy mess of a synopsis. I don't own the movie nor do I intend to watch it in the future, so hopefully, anyone who is familiar with this movie can fix it. TheLetterM 00:32, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. We can't say Deletion. I will however work on cleaning it up since this is one of my Favorite Movies. WillSWC (talk) 16:58, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary cleanup
Talk:A Hole in My Heart

message: :Image:A Hole in My Heart poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 05:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:A Hole in My Heart poster.jpg
Talk:Nina's Tragedies

message: Did someone just paste reviews into the entry? There are three different summaries here, a handful of factual errors, tons of opinion and unsubstantiated claims, and a total lack of structure. This is not an encyclopedia entry, it's a trainwreck. AshcroftIleum 05:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What a Mess!
Talk:List of Debian project leaders

message: I've gotta question the decision to split this out from the Debian article; it seems to me that a list of project leaders would be much better in context, and I just don't think such a list merits a standalone article. --maru   (talk)  contribs 01:36, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This list was not in the Debian article. Do you think it should be added to it? - Centrx 06:11, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. --maru   (talk)  contribs 19:57, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

text: The FSF article has a peculiar format for other things too and isn't a good representative example. The long list of people should be removed when the article is cleaned up. —Centrx→talk • 05:22, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No further discussion for 1.5 years;  I'll remove the merge banner.  —Sladen (talk) 09:26, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article worthiness 

message: I have removed the WikiProject tag, as this article is either a redirect or deleted. If you oppose, please restore the tag. Thank you, fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 15:57, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Computing 
Talk:Noi the Albino

message: Just to clear it out. He's not an albino. The name is just to get the feel that he's different from all the other. The director has stated this himself. Just so that you can see the difference from an albino and Noi, here's a picture of an albino --Steinninn 04:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noi is not an albino 

message: Noi Albinoi appears to be its official title in English.  Is there any reason why the article shouldn't be moved to that page? Lfh (talk) 14:11, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title in English 

message: Nói albínói
Alternative Title: Noi the Albino 
Release Date: Friday, January 24, 2003
MPAA: Rated PG-13 for language and brief nudity.
Runtime: France:82 min | Iceland:93 min | Netherlands:90 min (Rotterdam Film Festival) | Netherlands:95 min | Sweden:89 min | USA:93 min
Set in Bolungarvik (pop. 957) in Iceland's Western Fjords.
Bolungarvík is a fishing village in the far North-West of Iceland, located at the Vestfirðir peninsula.
The moody original musical score is from the director's band Slowblow.
"Nói is singular enough to have swept the Eddas, the Icelandic Academy Awards." (Los Angeles, Times Kenneth Turan)
DVD Features
* 5.1 surround
* Deleted scenes
* Making of featurette
* US theatrical trailer
* Previews
* Weblinks
• Gérard Lemarquis, who plays the French schoolteacher, is the father of 'Tomas Lemarquis', who plays Noi. Gérard Lemarquis is a French schoolteacher in real life, and the director 'Dagur Kari' was one of his students.
• Palm trees are repeatedly present in the movie as a symbol: on the Viewmaster slide, on Noi's father's shirt, on the cake her grandmother bakes and on the green wallpaper at his house.
• The beach footage in the end was shot in Cuba. In the original shot, Noi was walking on the beach. However, the director cut it, because he wanted a more ambiguous ending.
The extras on the DVD reveal that the director prefers less-professional actors and ambiguity.
He was not at all trying to portray real life in that village;
he was trying to tell a fantasy story about an alien.
Within the movie the recurring tropical theme seems to connect to Hawaii, but the repeated beach picture which comes alive at the end was actually filmed in Cuba; the director imagines that a sequel might be filmed there.
Filming locations for Nói albínói:
*Bolungarvík, Iceland
*Cuba
*Reykjavík, Iceland
*Ísafjörður, Iceland
*Þingeyri, Iceland
-96.233.30.113 (talk) 23:26, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD details
Talk:Old School (film)

message: The redirect You're my boy, Blue! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 16:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:You're my boy, Blue!]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:One Last Dance (2003 film)

message: disambiguation: Not to be confused with the song of the same name.
See the fensom myspace page for more info: http://www.myspace.com/fensom  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.186.85.120 (talk) 04:30, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  One Last Dance -A song perfomed by the band, Fensom
Talk:One Shot (2005 film)

message: I went in and changed the grammer in the first part of the article.
--Crispyfritters 22:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed Grammer 

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject!  Added film Infobox, sections ... some general cleanup. JubalHarshaw 16:30, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikified
Talk:Magyar Cserkészlány Szövetség

message: The explanation why I moved the article to exactly this title can be found here (although it seems that MCSLSZ has a new official page, cserkeszlanyok.hu, pretty much "under construction"). Since the official English name says "Girl Guides" and not "Girl Scouts", let's use the former throughout the article for the sake of consistency. KissL 08:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved it back-This is the organization's name, which it is internationally known by, above the English-language variant, and is in line with WAGGGS (international organization) naming conventions. We appreciate your worthwhile contributions, though. Chris 19:36, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved 

message: Would someone put this in order? Is this one law repeated, or some of them instead an existing other law? (minden cserkészt, separately)
4 A cserkészlány mindencserkészt testvérének tekint.
The Girl Guide considers every Scout/Guide her brother or sister.
5 A cserkészlány mindencserkészt testvérének tekint.
The Girl Guide considers every scout her brother or sister.
--62.68.191.26 08:52, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My fault --jergen 09:04, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guide Law 
Talk:HTTrack

message: Please review my English!!!--Alex brollo 01:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Please review my English

message: The wording of the 'Bugs' Section is strange and looks like original research.
'It can be used for small websites only which can be downloaded all at once' - well, what does that mean? I've personally used the update feature successfully.
'HTTrack is unable to interpret the HTTP header "Content-Type" correctly'. Maybe true, but this this seems to be the design of the program, and hence not a bug.
Citations needed, please, before adding this kind of material. 222.239.174.26 (talk) 03:00, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the section. -- BenRG (talk) 01:25, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bugs Section

message: Note from the author of HTTrack (xroche): I do not know whether it may be considered as citable source (and I won't discuss on the opportunity to keep the page - due to obvious conflicts of interest!), but several studies and/or pages are citing (sometimes very briefly - the main topic is not generally httrack itself) httrack:
* Tools and Techniques for Harvesting the World Wide Web - Jennifer L. Marill, Andrew Boyko, Michael Ashenfelder, and Laura Graham - Library of Congress
* Library Of Congress - NDSA: Web Archiving Survey Report - Digital Preservation
* File Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata - Library of Congress
* Managing Electronic Records (SAA Digital Archives Specialist Program)
* Archivematica: Creating a Comprehensive Digital Preservation System
* Report on the Crawl and Harvest of the Whole Australian Web Domain Undertaken during June and July 2005 - National Library of Australia
* Evaluation of Open Source Spidering Technology - David Kellogg June 14, 2004
* Collecting and preserving the World Wide Web - A feasibility study undertaken for the JISC and Wellcome Trust - Michael Day - UKOLN, University of Bath
And brief citations from the following sources:
* Penetration Tester's Open Source Toolkit - Jeremy Faircloth ()
* How to Start A Home-Based Web Design Business, 4th - Jim Smith ()
* Placing the Suspect Behind the Keyboard: Using Digital Forensics and Investigative Techniques to Identify Cybercrime Suspects - Brett Shavers ()
* Malware Forensic Field Guide for Windows Systems: Digital Forensics Field Guides - Cameron H. Malin, James M. Aquilina, Eoghan Casey ()
Other "online-only" citations:
* Resource List - archives.org - National archives
* Personal Digital Archiving Day Kit - The Library of Congress
Again, these may not be considered as sources, depending on what is considered as a valid source. And the cited samples are neither exhaustive, nor necessarily perfectly representative.
Xavier Roche (talk) 08:19, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of citable sources
Talk:Train to Pakistan

message: anyone care to give examples of POV problems with this article? Syzergy 01:43, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I fail to see the POV issues. The article is very neutral, "Singh makes it clear that many people played a part in this chaos and everyone was equally worthy of blame". Who can take issue with that? Lincoln187 09:20, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *I just removed the sentence "This is a startling poie have taken a right step at the right time then there would not have been such a massive bloodshed in India" (sic), which represents a POV problem example (apart from issues of meaning and grammar). This particular example may be fixable by quoting from the book itself (assuming this is the author's summary view of the Partition), otherwise there's a clear bias here. --Kink (talk) 11:51, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: *I'm just going to remove the POV section. In actuality, there are a number of characters with sufficient presence to be considered protagonists, so I don't think an accurate POV could even BE determined. If someone wants to work on a section regarding a possible bias of the author, that would be more appropriate. Event Nexus (talk) 22:24, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are appear to be two articles on the same novel, each with almost the same content. Train to Pakistan and Train to Pakiston (Mano Majra) should be combined. Glederma (talk) 02:12, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combine Articles
Talk:Paycheck (film)

message: Shouldn't there be a spoiler notice on the list of items, cuz it gives away much of the movie. Or the means in which Affleck uses the items should be removed.
The pre-release version of this film was so much better.  Paul Giamatti's character dies in the mall scene (and so is not present at the end as a third wheel).  There's no lottery ticket at the end; instead Afleck sees the diamond ring he lost in a pawn shop window (the opportunity to reclaim it). 71.162.141.213 15:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoiler?

message: According to Rottentomatoes that'd be a bit of a euphemism. Only 10% of Top critics gave it a positive rating. Greglocock (talk) 10:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Reviews were Mixed

message: The current plot are more confused than pevious plot. Fernvale (talk) 02:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: Above an alternative ending is mentioned. The DVD extra features includes commentaries from Woo and the screenwriter, both of these could be used to add more detailed 'Production' section to the article. It also includes the alternative ending, Rachel asks "Michael did you really plan everything that happened? Are you really that smart?" as they walk past a pawn shop, and Michael notices the thief, and in the shop window the diamond ring. He goes inside and comes out quickly, then proposes to Rachel. Some articles add alternative endings after the plot section. -- 109.76.220.27 (talk) 01:25, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative ending
Talk:Lemmings 2: The Tribes

message: User:MindlessXD removed this section because it was considered non-encyclopedic information (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lemmings_2%3A_The_Tribes&diff=83733431&oldid=83652464). A section on the traps in this game might be useful for some (especially new) game players, and could be used to indicate the progression of trap sophistication in the games. Could someone provide suggestions on how to make this section more encyclopedic? Gringer 12:14, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it would be sufficient to cite one or two examples ("For example, space lemmings can be killed by an open airlock, while outdoor lemmings must avoid being eaten by a frog"), partially because the current mention of traps is that they are theme-specific. Lists tend not to go over well anywhere. Nifboy 17:13, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Should the description of skills section be rewritten to follow a similar format? Gringer 13:30, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, pick an example, any example at all, but no more, generally. I would make a point of how there are 40+ skills over the original 8. Nifboy 13:49, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of Traps section
Talk:Poolhall Junkies

message: An anonymous visitor injected the following commentary at the end of the first paragraph of the article's plot summary:
Someone with a DVD or whatever can check it out and see if the plot summary needs adjustment. It's been too long since I've watched the film to be certain.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  18:42, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anonymous complaint about plot summary
Talk:Metaphysical naturalism

message: * Greek antiagnostic poster/rationalist nontheist
Agnosticism opens the door to/the possibility of validity of metaphysical personocracy (explicitly as [a] person-god[s] or implicitly as projected personocratic bias [based on what makes sense to a thinker who fulfils Mary Anne Warren's criteria for personhood] unto an impersonal divine field [or fields]), or in the case of agnostic atheism, it closes the door to sound and complete treatises on metaphysical naturalism.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4102:F9F8:B96A:16F4:EEF3:E944 (talk) 01:45, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make paragraph, and also page (in the namesake page include the theistic criticism/opinions): [[antiagnosticism]]
Talk:Battle of the Overpass

message: Well, where are the photographs of this event?JettaMann 18:35, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Presumably not out of copyright, yet. Piano non troppo (talk) 06:57, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How many died?
How many where injured?
Description of the battle?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.164.52.89 (talk) 12:27, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Deaths
Talk:John Houseman

message: I have read somewhere that John Houseman was related to Baron Haussmann, the designer of modern Paris, but do not know whether this is true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.19.77.133 (talk • contribs) 
::They are distant cousins, this according to a relative of his who told me but it can't be added to the main article as it would constitute original research.
Considering the fact that the Baron was protestant and Housemen's father was Jewish according to the article, I find that pretty unlikely.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:69C1:2A00:99A3:5AAD:5500:F861 (talk) 06:28, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Related to Baron Haussmann?

message: Can we expand on his artistic and political life in the 1930s? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.240.250.63 (talk) 10:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Political Involvement?

message: In the film "Cradle Will Rock," Houseman is portrayed by actor Cary Elwes. His performance incorporated Houseman's famous accent. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.164.89.236 (talk) 22:38, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cary Elwes

message: The Naked Gun did not come out in 1982.  Also, TNG page says it was Houseman's last movie. Is this correct?RyanGentry (talk) 00:15, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of The Naked Gun Movie

message: He was born in Romania at a time when they were still using the Julian calendar, 13 days behind the Gregorian. Under which calendar was his widely-reported birth date? --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 19:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date: which calendar?
Talk:The Real Cancun

message: 7.5 mil for a reality film? I thought reality was pretty much the cheapest genre to film, what did the money get blown on? Advertising?--SeizureDog 10:26, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Where did the money go?

message: Should probably mention somewhere in the article that the location (resort) that this movie was filmed at is called the Avalon Baccara Hotel. Patsissons (talk) 05:25, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: Removed the sentence beginning "one of the more memorable moments..." because it's completely POV and sounds stupid anyway 82.32.185.56 (talk) 02:49, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "One of the more memorable moments..."