lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Music of Massachusetts

message: I'm new to editing Wikipedia pages so this is more of a question, though probably not placed in the right section.  I was reading this page and found the section which mentioned the band Lord Jeff and how it the relation to Lord Jeffrey Amherst.  It states that Jeffrey Amherst named the town of Amherst,"who also named Amherst."  Although, this is untrue as Jeffrey Amherst never stepped foot in the town. The reason the town is named after him is because he was close to governor or state rep. of the time.  I'm sorry if this is not completely clear as I did the research for a project years ago and do not have the citation at hand.  Though, If I may be allowed a moment to find them I can provide the documentation. I know this may seem trivial to some, but being a resident of Amherst, MA, we have developed a notable legacy of fighting for the most inane trivialities.Illmatic5746 (talk) 20:27, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As Wiki itself noted, this piece is very light on information.  Boston has a rich musical history of the Pops, the Symphony, Berklee School of Music, various opera companies, etc.  The city has been very influential in popular music, quite often being influenced by British styles and introducing them to the rest of the country.  The Boston Sound of the 1960s was influenced by the Beatles and the other British Invasion bands, while Boston's New Wave movement of the late 1970s took its energy from British punk and art rock influences.  Along the way, many bands were signed by national record companies.  A few like Aerosmith, The Cars, and Boston achieved international fame.  The piece here seems overwhelmed by the article on hardcore, which was only a small part of the Boston scene that, for the most part, could be termed more New Wave, Garage Rock and Art Rock than punk.  I hope some of Boston's musical experts can flesh out some of these areas. Danpetitpas (talk) 18:40, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very light 
Talk:Music of New York City

message: If someone writes something under those three blank headings then maybe it could be nominated for good article status. EdGl 21:44, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Article 

message: Does anyone else feel that bulge? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.149.59.218 (talk • contribs) 23:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree it should be replaced with something shorter. What's there is probably better off at music history of New York City, with this article containing a lot more on music industry, education, festivals and parades, and such. Tuf-Kat 02:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Condensing the article? 

message: Joey Bada$$ is not from Bed Stuy but is from East Flatbush. I still think he’s worth being mentioned and I suggest talking about the “Beast Coast” movement of Flatbush-based acts like the rest of Pro Era, the Flatbush Zombies, and the Underachievers. 
Tmojeed (talk) 16:47, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hip Hop Artists from Bed Stuy 

message: There is a total lack of coverage of the current electronic music scene. –Yutsi - Talk/Edits 19:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electronic music
Talk:Music of North Carolina

message: This page needs a section on NC hardcore. The Brewery, the Sound Vent, Greene Street. BTBAM, KillWhitneyDead, etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ledcraft (talk • contribs) 20:44, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NC Hardcore 

message: Is this article about music specifically originating in NC or more of a general historical overview? If the latter, quite a number of musicians born in NC are missing from the page: Randy Travis, Clay Aiken, Eric Church, Roberta Flack, Chris Daughtry, Fantasia Barrino, Earl Scruggs. Not that Wikipedia is a compilation of lists, but page is currently missing quite a number of notable and recently famous individuals.
Digitect (talk) 04:27, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NC Musicians? 

message: I removed the following ref from the lead section b/c I couldn't find a discussion of the Triangle or even NC in the book:  I also took out a lot of the bands from the long lead-section list, all except notable groups with solid wiki pages. The other groups do deserve discussion in their respective sub-sections, but let's keep the lead short and strong.--Junius49 (talk) 15:53, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead section 

message: I am a professor of music at UNC-Chapel Hill and as a class project for a music class I am teaching we will be editing the page over the next few weeks. Just a heads up. --Mark Katz PeaceKatz (talk) 16:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class project editing Music of North Carolina
Talk:Music of Ohio

message: Someone should add a blurb about JFK/Joe Hedges to the Cincinatti section
134.131.125.49 19:30, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  July for Kings/Joe Hedges 

message: This list needs editing by someone knowledgeable enough about the subject:
The most famous musicians from Ohio are:
* Criminal Authority  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.91.116.204 (talk) 01:21, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assorted list 

message: He should be included, as a West Sider (Lakewood/Parma Heights) 24.56.82.74 (talk) 00:47, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How could you leave Ben Orr of the cars out of the list?
Talk:Music of Pennsylvania

message: Hard to believe there's nothing about jazz or R&B in this article, as Philadelphia is much more known for those than for punk rock. 
Nothing about Nina Simone or John Coltrane? Nothing about Philly Soul?
Lots more to Pennsylvania music than this brief article.  No mention of Fred Warring
and his "Young Pennsylvanians." He was from Tyrone. No mention of Dan Hartmen, "I Can Dream About You," from Harrisburg.  And how did you miss Joe Pass (Johnstown) and
George Benson (Pittsburgh)? PA music history can and should fill a museum somewhere!
71.55.126.11 (talk) 17:59, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Under "Rock and Pop Music", I didn't think it was best for everything after 1980 to be kept together. 
So I split it into two groups. The 80's and 90's, and then 2000 to present. 
I did the best I could make sure the bands were moved to the appropriate new category. 
Some of the bands may have 'formed' in one era, but I tried to list them by their major release dates. Otherwise, every Joe with a garage band would think they should be listed here as well. I figured if we listed them by their major breakthrough to the mainstream, then garage bands would take the hint and not vandalize the place. 
I would also like to see some sort of organization done. 
Maybe alphabetical. What do you think? 
Perhaps I will do it on another day. I just couldn't do it after all of the other work I just did. Changing and rearranging.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:983:8001:5B1E:8BB:D2CD:4798:104 (talk) 18:01, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  DATE CHANGE
Talk:Music of Puerto Rico

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Pacho El Antifeka and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 8#Pacho El Antifeka until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 00:20, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Pacho El Antifeka" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Music of Tennessee

message: The Music of Tennessee article fails to include the early role of Bristol, Tennessee (and more specifically the musicians living in the Bristol, Tennessee) during the early days of recording country music.4.88.60.183 12:10, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bristol, Tennessee: country music and recording music in the 1910s-1920s
Talk:Music of Virginia

message: Bluegrass?!
Country?
Rock?
Hip-Hop?!
The music of Virginia is not notable primarily for its Punk Scene.
I'll admit that I'm complaining about the problem without doing anything about it but nonetheless . . .
LegCircus 16:11, Oct 9, 2004 (UTC)
: Add the category :Category:Music of Virginia to any articles in wikipedia and we'll be better able to edit this article. MPS 17:18, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  so much is needed 

message: OMG LAMB OF GOD R00lZ CHRIS ADLER IZ BEST DRUMMER EVER
MENTION LAMB OF GOD!?!?!?!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.199.194.5 (talk) 18:31, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WHERE THE LAMB OF GOD??

message: Kate Smith, noted singer of God Bless America, was born in Greenville, Virginia.--Artaxerxes 01:40, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Kate Smith and her genre?
Talk:Music of Washington (state)

message: ray charles cant be from washington,in the article on him there is no mention of washington except d.c.Reallytinyprint 18:19, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: umm....

message: Does anyone abject to me getting rid of this list? It doesn't really help the article. There are other places that list washington bands (:Category:Washington musical groups, :Category:Washington musicians). It might be helpful to link to those category pages. However, I don't think it would be helpful to create a list of Washington bands (that's actually been done. The article was deleted). I'd like to delete this section, but I wanted some comment before I did. EndlessVince 16:29, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: EndlessVince, I partially agree.  I think if the list only represented "notable" bands from Washington, that would be worthwhile.  However, that opinion, "notable", is probably too subjective.   So maybe such a list is a bad idea.  I know I could double the length of that "notable" list today.  I dunno'.  J_Tom_Moon_79 (talk) 22:01, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: List of noted bands
Talk:Music of Wisconsin

message: Just wondering why Art Paul Schlosser was edited out of the Madison portion of this article? He has been featured on the internationally distributed Dr. Demento show and documented many times - he's basically Madison's Daniel Johnston and is quite prolific and notable.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.129.206.208 (talk) 17:01, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Practically everything in this article is false and based on extremely delusional original research. I move for deletion.
65.30.180.228 (talk) 17:52, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources???
Talk:Eddington number

message: "I believe there are 15 747 724 136 275 002 577 605 653 961 181 555 468 044 717 914 527 116 709 366 231 425 076 185 631 031 296 296 protons in the universe and the same number of electrons."
Did he actually said thatc? How would that be written in text then?  — Kieff | Talk 06:54, Sep 20, 2004 (UTC)
Actually, it's a quote from his Philosophy of Physical Science. According to a lecture given by Chandrasekhar, Bertrand Russell asked Eddington if he had computed this number himself or if he had someone else do it for him. Eddington replied that he had done it himself during an Atlantic crossing! (Chandrasekhar, S. "Eddington: The most respected astrophysicist of our time").
I, however, have a question of my own - what exactly is the connection between this massive number and 1/137? The article doesn't explain it. Were they both called Eddington number? Is there a physical connection between them (in which case Eddington's article needs to be changed to reflect this)? Confusing Manifestation 14:15, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

message: # Are the notation NEdd and the name "Eddington number" still used to talk about the number of protons in the universe? Or are they only used historically, in the context of Eddington's conjecture?
# If they are currently used, this article should mention the currently accepted figure for this number. If not, it should point to the appropriate other article. --Macrakis (talk) 18:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Actual number of protons
Talk:Shoe

message: The plural of "Man" and "Woman" is "Men" and "Women", not "Mens" and "Womens", so the plural possessive of these words is "Men's" and "Women's".  Please correct the "Mens'" and "Womens'" section headers to "Men's" and "Women's". 49.198.51.54 (talk) 23:05, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Also corrected some instances in the text. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:58, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 June 2022 

message: Change "bone points bone awals" to "bone awls" under History. 134.88.137.102 (talk) 08:22, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Tollens (talk) 09:49, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 December 2023 

message: I hope to add some content on on prehistoric adoption of footwear to . Here are some sources I put together in a fairly thorough Google Scholar search:
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* Pearson, O. M., Pablos, A., Rak, Y., & Hovers, E. (2020). A Partial Neandertal Foot From the Late Middle Paleolithic of Amud Cave, Israel. PaleoAnthropology, 2020, 98-125. doi:10.4207/PA.2020.ART144 https://www.paleoanthropology.org/ojs/index.php/paleo/article/download/801/762
* 
* 
* 
* 
* </ref>
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
 is a good place to start, and would alone significantly improve this article. Feel free to add content from these sources now. If not, I'll get around to it eventually. Daask (talk) 01:02, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prehistoric footwear 

message: The current version of the Wikipedia article on shoes exhibits an advertisement-like tone in certain sections, such as Athletic Shoes, Boot, and Dress and Casual Shoes. These sections contain detailed brand histories, specific product names, and descriptions that resemble promotional material rather than neutral, encyclopedic content. For instance, the Athletic Shoes section includes detailed accounts of brand histories and specific product names, which can be seen as promotional rather than informative. Similarly, the Boot section contains detailed descriptions of specific types of boots and their features, including mentions of specific brands, which might be interpreted as promoting those brands rather than providing neutral information. Additionally, the Dress and Casual Shoes section includes detailed brand information and specific product types, which could be perceived as more suited to a marketing brochure than an encyclopedia article. To align with Wikipedia's standards of neutrality and reliability, the article should be revised to present information in a neutral and educational manner, focusing on the historical, cultural, and functional aspects of different types of shoes, while ensuring that claims about specific brands or products are supported by reliable sources. Cleter (talk) 01:49, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement template
Talk:Anthozoa

message: I guess they havn't a meduza stage??? So the picture isn't really the best for Anthozoa? Dixi 08:12, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture wrong

message: The info is good in all but can't they atlest put wher in the uderwter world they are, because I dont think my correction that they live in all the ocean is that accurate.--Lava159 23:20, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They are all marine. Richard001 (talk) 08:22, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  wht's up wit dat 

message: The heading to this page has obvious vandalism. But it goes too far back for me too find it a clean revision. Someone needs to go through and undo it. 72.210.70.128 (talk) 22:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In reading it, I see no glaring errors. Could you point some of them out? Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs)  01:22, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The vandalism I saw was edited out(reverted?) about 3 minutes after I posted this. Sorry for wasting your time Reveiwer. 72.210.70.128 (talk) 20:55, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a problem. I enjoy reading about sponges. Well, not really, but I don't mind helping out.  Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs)  01:44, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stealth Vandalism 

message: This article says more than 16,000 Anthozoa species have been described, but how many is extant species? It is hard to find a source for this. Anyone who knows? Höstblomma (talk) 06:31, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extant species
Talk:Bairiki (village)

message: Bairiki is not a village but a small town on an islet (with the same name).
The official name of the capital is not Bairiki but Teinainano Urban Council (from Bairiki to Bonriki), also known as South Tarawa.
It's a mistake to consider Bairiki as the capital of Kiribati.
The Parliament, for example, is not in the Bairiki islet but Ambo islet.--Enzino 10:57, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the clarification.  It is unnecessary to have separate Bairiki (village) and Bairiki (island) articles. Indeed, I'm, moving all material to South Tarawa to reduce the number of stubs here - Marshman 21:08, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Zero divided by zero

message: OK - this can be worked on here, but should eventually go to strengthen indeterminate form, in my opinion. Charles Matthews 11:01, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not at all sure it's so natural to do that.  After all 0/0 is an indeterminate form, and 5/0 is not an indeterminate form. Michael Hardy 22:17, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree it should redirect to indeterminate form and will change it so it does.  There is some material in division by 0 which could be added to indeterminate form.  This is the explanation of why 0/0 can't be given a value.  However we would need to rewrite it to apply more generally to other indeterminate forms. Barnaby dawson 08:06, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Runge's phenomenon

message: It is quite simple to obtain all derivatives of f(x) = 1/(1+25x^2) in x=0.  Using the geometric series we immediately obtain a power series.  Hence, by the identity theorem of power series we also have its taylor series and therefore its derivatives.  Here the details:
For |x|<1/5 the geometric series gives us (substitute q=-25x^2)
:
f(x) = \frac{1}{1+25x^2} = \sum\limits_{k=0}^{\infty} (-1)^k 25^k x^{2k}
Because of the identity theorem of power series this has to be identical to the taylor series
:
f(x) = \sum\limits_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{f^{(k)}(x_0)}{k!}(x-x_0)^k
So we obtain
:
f^{(2k+1)}(0) = 0, \quad k=0,1,2,\dots
and
:
\frac{f^{(2k)}(0)}{(2k)!} = (-1)^k 25^k \; \Leftrightarrow \; f^{(2k)}(0) = (-1)^k 25^k (2k)! \quad k=0,1,2,\dots
So we observe for k=0,1,2,\dotsthat the even derivatives in 0 are
:
f^{\,(2k)}(0) = (-1)^k 5^{2k} (2k)!
such that the error bound gets arbitrary large.  Maybe one also should note that a large error bound is no sufficient condition for a large error.
Mlehn (talk) 11:39, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magnitude of Derivatives 

message: However, this particular set of polynomial functions Pn(x) is not guaranteed to have the property of uniform convergence; the theorem only states that a set of polynomial functions exists, without providing a general method of finding one.
This last statement seems wrong, given that there exist constructive proofs to the theorem, as in with the Bernstein polynomials: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernstein_polynomial
--Pliskin14 (talk) 12:17, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong statement? 

message: The equidistance between points leads to a Lebesgue constant qui increases quickly when n increases.
'qui'??? Do you mean 'that'?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.250.118.80 (talk) 04:00, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo?
Template talk:Jaguar

message: I couldn't find a nice way of having the title as a link to Jaguar and having the image at the top, so I've just used the image for now.  Perhaps when I have time and energy I will do another version of the Jaguar logo without the name at the bottom, specifically for this template. akaDruid 13:08, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo v.s. Name Link

message: ...about the TWR and the Group 44 racers which seems to be excluded, may as well if the Jaguar XJR-15 is included -- User:WilliRennen 17:08, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm not sure if it worth mentioning... 

message: brought this in from the Jaguar car talk page -
Timeline is missing the midsize 420 Compact 1966-68 if someone wants to do.
I notice the very early cars have been removed from the timeline too, eg SS1 and Jaguar SS100. There were also links to pictures which are now broken. I know they are pre Jaguar naming but I think they should be present. Solander 20 November 2005, 13:40 (UTC)
:Timeline could also do with the parent owners included.GraemeLeggett 15:19, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Completed.  The very early cars have been reinstated to the timeline now. The 420 and parent owners have previously been added. Cruickshanks (talk) 00:54, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline
Talk:Nivea (singer)

message: Nivea is also a famous brand :   http://www.nivea.com/
:yes, perhaps that should be in the "Nivea" article instead of this never-heard-of rapper... Alensha 19:31, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: (1) She's an R&B singer, not just a rapper. (2) Plenty of people have heard of her. (3) If you want to make a disambig page, go right ahead. Just make sure to disambiguate all the "Nivea" links that link to the singer. --b. Touch 21:17, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: (1) She might be well-known in her city/country etc., but internationally the brand is more famous. (2) I admit "never-heard-of" was POV. I'm sorry. (3) Disambiguation done. Alensha 15:22, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Media Take Out is NOT and I repeat NOT a credible source for any entertainment and should never be used as a credible source. Singers like Rihanna and Beyonce have been rumored on there many times and have shot down the rumors countless times  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nocturne09 (talk • contribs) 17:23, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Hey RPoD, rather than just deleting all the biographical info the (seeming) newbs are trying to add, why not give them a hand? Maybe some suggestions on the talk page if their attempts seem to be in good faith? 
For example, they could use references to well-respected music magazines such as Rolling Stone, Spin, NME, or The Source rather than to random .coms, don't you think? PerfesserC (talk) 15:05, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography references
Talk:9 to 5

message: Should be moved to Wiki-dictionary, or whatever it's called. Is there a template for this? --Wing Nut 21:00, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not an article

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 20:43, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-01-31 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: The article is clearly written from the point of view of the Americans only. The "globalize" sign should be included here just as it already is included in the business hours article. 88.101.185.82 (talk) 20:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize 

message: I have deleted all unsourced material (the whole article), it's a nice personal theory but this is not content for wiki, 3 years should have been enough for you to find sources DarkShroom (talk) 17:54, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content Removed 