Talk:Kim Possible (character)/Archive 1

message: According to kp tv tome, Kim's middle name is Ann, not Anne.
:IMDB also agrees Christy Carlson Romano ProveIt 01:03, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ann vs. Anne 

message: This character was until recently listed in the "Fictional vigilante" category. And while, technically, she does seem to operate without regard to the law in some respects, she doesn't really qualify. For one thing, unlike every other character there (pretty much), she doesn't take vengeance. She's more "foil this plot, then hand over criminals to the police". I have removed the listing. -- Supermorff 11:18, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vigilante? Uh... don't think so

message: I barely remember there being a promo like that, but even if it's true, they most likely did that as a joke, just like how Disney "paired" Dave and Lizzie McGuire. --Erased Paper 03:23, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dave The Barbarian

message: Is Kim's age static, or dynamic?  The screen shot of the title section indicate that Kim is a sophomore in high school, but the series never changed the title section, so Kim might have aged.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jumping cheese (talk • contribs) 
Well, Steve Lotor did say that she was going to be 18 in the upcoming Season 4, so it's assumable that each new season advances her age a year. 69.148.77.47 21:42, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, if Kim is 18, then she will be a senior in high school.  Would that automatically end the series after season 4?  =D  Jumping cheese Contact 02:50, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

text: It's confirmed in the Season 4 episode Ill Suited that Kim is a senior in high school now.  So that makes her 17 or 18 years old.  =D  Jumping cheese Cont@ct 21:33, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kim's Age

message: I readded the content: the point stated is very specific, that the creators acknowledge the problem and agree it has to be handled delicately. Since that point also refers to an interview, that interview has to be cited appropriately. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 08:40, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll merge the info together.  =)  Jumping cheese Contact 20:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Interview

message: Just to note, removing Kigo purely because it was fanfic was wrong. If they are notable, fan-views and audience reactions are permissible under certain conditions. However, the way in which the section was written did not meet those conditions because it violated WP:OR, so deleting it was right. If people want to include Kigo or other fan views (such as shipping between Ron and Kim), they will need to use a third party source that passes WP:V and WP:RS.
perfectblue 10:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kigo

message: I notice that perfectblue removed actually true things (not WP:OR) about Kim's character, such as how she goes into a frenzy, cheats and even lies to get what she wants. Is this because we don't like seeing the bad side of Kim? I think it makes her more human. Can we please put it back in? It doesn't violate any policies and the actions were episode verified! (also, those were not Bonnie's posters she was pulling down).
Kim isn't actually a perfect person.=CJK= 19:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Kim Possible (character)#Personality|Personality Flaws]]