Talk:Dodge Stratus

message: The Mitsubishi Eclipse also shares the same platform as the Stratus Coupe.  They're the exact same car except for the outer styling.  Everything inside the car is stamped with the Mitsu Tri-Diamond (Minus the badging), right down to the magnets on the stock speakers. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.202.132.77 (talk) 13:13, 22 April 2006
:They are not , altho sharing many interior tweaks and the manual transmission option as the Eclipse , the platform is actually from the Galant. The suspension , track layout and chassis length re all from the Galant and not the Eclipse. The Eclipse platform and chassis is also derived from the Galant , shortened it is yes in the Eclipse model but not by much.Kongkit (talk) 15:31, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eclipse 

message: http://www.topix.net/autos/dodge-stratus
Stratus and Sebring gone for good
Posted May 21st 2006 9:03AM by John Neff
Filed under: Convertibles, Sedans/Saloons, Plants/Manufacturing, Chrysler, DaimlerChrysler, Dodge
:The 2001-2007 Stratus models are better than the 1995-2000 models. The 1995-2000 Stratus models were slow. Well, the base models were slow. They had underpowered 132-horsepower 4-cylinder engines. The Stratus ES had the 168-horsepower V-6, and the 150-horsepower 2.4-liter 4-cylinder engine was also available. I believe that's the base engine for the newer Stratus models, and the R/T has a 200-horsepower V-6. That one has some kicking butt. My garbage truck also kicks butt. —Flatts 14:35, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding the above conversation, the 132-hp 2.0 4-cylinder only came with a manual transmission, and the 150-hp 2.4 4-cylinder came with the automatic. With the 2.4 engine, the Stratus will do 0-60 in 10 seconds, and it's a little slower with the 2.0 engine and MT. --Snuffleupagus 19:30, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  end of the line 

message: I made a note in the section which talks about the first generation. I was flipping through an old Canadian fleet book (98) when I came across Stratus. Although it has long been assumed that the base engine on ES was the 2.4 4cyl, I was very surprised to read that they could be had with the 2.0. I have never seen a 2.0 ES in person (I've been around a lot of these cars over the years) and have only heard of a 2.0 ES on one or two occasions, but at the time thought of those individuals as mistaken...but I guess not. This is probably much like the Chrysler Minivans. Most people have heard on 5spd minivans, but most didn't know that a 5spd could be had in them even throughout the 90s until 95, eventhough a 3spd auto was a no charge almost all cases (I have only seen 1 5spd 90s Chrysler minivan, a 95 Voyager). Jon the dodgeboy 23:57, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ES with a 2.0.... 

message: The main picture of this article isn't the Dodge Stratus, it the chrysler Cirrus! Can someone change the picture? 24.151.137.19 (talk) 23:45, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main Picture 

message: I propose that the "Cloud cars" or Chrysler JA platform cars be merged into a single article. I propose this because these cars are just an example of badge-engineering with only the front fascia, name and taillights to differentiate the three.VX1NG (talk) 11:54, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: UPDATE: I propose that the 1st generation Chrysler Sebring sedan and 2nd generation Dodge Stratus sedan be merged into the Chrysler Sebring article. I propose this because these cars are just another example of badge-engineering with only the front fascia and name to differentiate the two.VX1NG (talk) 15:55, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposals 

message: seems off too me... is that the price for the tooling, the price for the entire production run or ??? I can't imagine that anyone would pay 151 million USD for one vehicle. But that's how it reads to me. ++Lar: t/c 03:15, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volga Siber price