lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Two Towers

message: What source do we have for the indvidual titles of book 3 and 4? They are not present in any edition that I have(Harper Collins paperback and Gebers swedish paperback).
:Letters has 'The Treason of Isengard' and 'The Ring goes East' (#136) and these were used on the HMCO 'Millenium edition'. The Marquette manuscript (of LotR) has instead 'The Treason of Isengard' and 'The Journey of the Ringbearers'. I haven't seen the 'Journey to Mordor' title before. --CBD 01:51, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Titles of book 3 and 4

message: How about a PUBLICATION DATE?!  Yes, that would be nice for a work of fiction.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.55.157.250 (talk) 13:50, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Publication

message: Wikiproject Novels has this at B-class, while the others are start-class. Shouldn't they all be one? --Glimmer721 talk 00:57, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not necessarily, each project rates the article separately though most of the time they are consistent. Derild4921☼ 01:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Add to that the fact that some project may re-assess articles while others tend to only doing assessment in an early state of the article and forget about it later. De728631 (talk) 14:00, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality?

message: Much like in The Fellowship of the Ring article, the presence of chapter summaries is unnecessary and irrelevant. I am deleting this section, and if anybody has any concerns about this matter, please discuss it here before reverting my edit. This matter has also been discussed on The Fellowship of the Ring talk page, so refer to that if you will. Steed Asprey - 171 (talk) 17:20, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Chapter Summaries

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect T2t. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Hog Farm (talk) 19:22, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "T2t" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The AfD suggesting merge/delete and redirect has closed, and another discussion about merging all three LotR volumes' articles into The Lord of the Rings has now opened at Talk:The Lord of the Rings#Proposed merge of The Fellowship of the Ring etc into The Lord of the Rings, as of February 4.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  10:00, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice of proposal to merge to ''The Lord of the Rings'' 

message: Please see my proposal at Fellowship of the Ring.--Jack Upland (talk) 19:27, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summaries: the way forward?
Talk:The Return of the King

message: Can I ask where it's stated that the Witch-King uses the power of his ring to destroy the gate? It's not in the Lord of the Rings itself so I think it requires a citation. GimliDotNet (talk) 20:49, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Reworded: magical power is certainly used, as the ram Grond is bound about with spells. But whether it's from the Ring is another matter. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:55, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of the Ring to Destroy the Gate of Minas Tirith 

message: From time to time, editors seek to extend the summaries in this and the other The Lord of the Rings book articles. The novel is obviously much loved, and the many fans of book and film naturally wish to see the articles providing the sort of coverage that they might find in a dedicated Tolkien encyclopedia or fansite. 
However, Wikipedia is not such a site, and it deprecates extensive summaries. The existing summaries have been carefully constructed to cover the central narrative, starting with one short sentence per chapter: and the result was already to create rather detailed summaries. These have been polished over the years, and in the main they have reached rather stable form, though of course definite errors can always be fixed. What we can't have is constantly growing length.
The same applies in this volume to the Appendices, which are extremely long and detailed, and of great interest to fans and scholars. Wikipedia again can't begin to reproduce the full content of these extensive sections of the novel, though I daresay that Appendices to The Lord of the Rings would make a fine and scholarly article if properly researched and cited. For the current article, the coverage is necessarily brief, and limited to the key facts. That does mean that many details have to be omitted; again, there are plenty of large books and websites that cover exactly that kind of material in loving detail, which we are obliged to refrain from including.
To give just one example, "Reveals that Sam and Rosie had thirteen children and that Pippin and Merry also respectively married; Pippin's son Faramir married Sam's daughter Goldilocks." is in my view inappropriate for this article in both style ("Reveals" is journalese, not encyclopedic; the article is written in British English sentences) and in content (these are minor details, not central to the narrative). Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:08, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the details recently added are minor and ought not to be included. The violate the intent and guidelines of WP:SUMMARY and WP:PLOT. Strebe (talk) 19:51, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive plot/contents detail
Talk:NWA World Junior Heavyweight Championship

message: Can anyone find a picture of the belts that have been used though the 70 years that this championship has been around? 2601:145:600:3A29:2850:75F5:994B:6B93 (talk) 02:38, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of belt 

message: Hello
  This article has a contradiction in itself. In the main paragraph it states. 
The title has been in existence from 1945 to the present.
  However in the display box it states
Date retired	September 30, 2017
  What is correct?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7000:BE00:FC25:58D3:949B:EDFC:BDBC (talk) 04:30, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: =======
Talk:Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance

message: *SUWA also works to protect areas in Utah that it believes qualifies as Wilderness under the federal Wilderness Act of 1964 from uses which SUWA believes is incompatible with Wilderness or would cause these areas to be disqualified from Wilderness consideration [1], such as off-road vehicle use, mountain biking [2], aircraft over flights, grazing, oil and gas development, and mining.
Though mountain biking is not allowed in federally-designated wilderness areas, I don't believe that SUWA is targetting that activity. I couldn't find anything on their website about it. -Will Beback 18:41, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wilderness
Talk:Johnny Jeter

message: –On Johnny's Obsessed With Wrestling profile, http://www.onlineworldofwrestling.com/profiles/j/johnny-jeter.html, it says he was born in 1981, but here it says 1985. Surely 1981 would be the correct year, as he's been wrestling a long time
Johnny jeter was voted most hated heel in his time in ovw. johnny jeter was help used to hype up ken doane in the spirit squad  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinoprcool (talk • contribs) 05:44, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Online World of Wrestling profile

message: in his time in ovw jeter won tag team titles and was ovw world champion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinoprcool (talk • contribs) 05:46, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Both of which are in the article already. Do you have a point to saying this here? ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 00:33, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ovw 

message: Has Johnny been released or not. His name is on the wwe alumni page but it didnt say it in the article.--Adam Penale (talk) 16:32, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The confusion is over that one dirtsheet website ran an article saying that he had been released according to the Wrestling Observer Newsletter, but WON never said such a thing. The dirtsheet website isn't considered a reliable source, so it can't be used to back up the claim. I would take it as he hasn't been released, as I haven't seen it on any other websites, as unreliable as most of them are, and WWE usually posts a short notice on their website whenever they release someone anyway. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 22:47, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Then why is he on the alumni page? i don't want to remove him if he really is.--Adam Penale (talk) 23:07, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know to be sure. I've brought it up at WT:PW, because I don't subscribe to WON, and I'm hoping that someone else does, and will be able to clear it up. Just to note, that the source used on the alumni page is unreliable, so you would be able to remove the info if you so desired. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 23:12, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

text: To be included in the article, reliable sources need to be provided. Thanks, NiciVampireHeart 07:35, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  released or not 
Talk:G vs E

message: And it REAAAAALLY needs a fixing.  Seriously.
: As do your Wikipedia editing skills. How exactly is it promotional? Where is your signature? Why should anyone care about your opinion? Jyg (talk) 06:22, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  This whole page is a promotional piece 

message: If I remember correctly, the "SciFi" season actually was loosely related to the USA season.  I seem to remember it being a lot darker with less funny/silly parts and also the history of the characters (from the first ep) being completely retconned.  Can anyone confirm or was I imagining how terrible the SciFi season was compared to the USA season?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thx1200 (talk • contribs) 18:49, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  More on the switch from G vs E to Good vs Evil
Talk:The Moviegoer

message: I discovered the Wikipedia page was in need of expansion, and having long enjoyed this novel, wanted to help. However, these are my first contributions to a fiction page, so I am learning on the job here, trying my best to follow the guidelines.
I added a section about characters, based on the style guidelines. Those say a well-crafted plot summary may make such a section unnecessary, and eventually perhaps it may be unnecessary, but at least for now, it seemed warranted. I recently finished re-reading the novel for the first time in years, and am re-reading it again, and hope to make further contributions to the page as I go. So far, I am only making basic factual contributions, but hope to be able to make contributions to the plot and themes, eventually.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rontl (talk • contribs) 18:29, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2020 Edits
Talk:West Hampstead tube station

message: The article says "The station opened 30 June 1879 as part of the Metropolitan Line" but did the Metropolitan Line/line exist at that time? Wasn't one of the Metropolitan/District companies the builder?--SilasW (talk) 21:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The Metropolitan Railway was the builder of this station and it served as the temporary terminus of the northern branch of the railway when it was extended from Swiss Cottage.--DavidCane (talk) 00:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin
Talk:BMW R90S

message: * Wikipedia:Verifiability
* Wikipedia:Reliable sources
* Wikipedia:Citing sources
KarenAnn 18:49, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Policies

message: Yes, this reads like something copied from a biker mag, and the first-person use of "I never use it" and "my bike" is completely out of place here. And is the model R90S or R90s? This article needs a lot of work. Chris the speller 16:16, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone 

message: I have tried to tone down the article and cut out quite a lot of the POV stuff. I would appreciate others taking a look, to reduce the amount of opinion and increase the amount of fact. --Biker Biker (talk) 18:26, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone - again

message: The term "airhead" was not invented until much later: it was not needed when all BMW motorcycles had aircooled engines, and only came into use after BMW started building watercooled engines and engines with oil-cooled cylinderheads, as well as air-cooled engines.
The R90S along with other /6 & /7 models were unusual in that they were so well-balanced on the centre-stand that either wheel could be removed (eg for puncture repairs) without the bike needing additional support (see owners manual; I will look for additional citations). John-in-England (talk) 10:18, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that airhead is a recent term but don't have any strong feelings for or against using it. As for balance, perhaps it was unusual at the time, but my more modern R1150GS is exactly the same. --Biker Biker (talk) 16:25, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Anachronism and additional info
Talk:Bernard Darnton

message: This guy is a non-entity.  He hardly rates a one liner let alone all this... And his Court case is just  a stunt Kiwimw 18:50, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He's the leader of a political party, man.  And of course its a publicity stunt, thats what politicans DO.  What got up your nose?  Ppe42 01:07, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of a political party that used to get fewer votes than McGillicuddy Serious... and at least there stunts were funny --Limegreen 01:33, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I don't get it.  Everything on the page is verifiable fact, and the court case is important enough to warrant publishing in newspapers and magazines, eg the National Business Review.  IMHBBO, the page is also NPOV.  Please don't simply remove NPOV facts for no apparent reason other than that you personally disagree with the subject of the article.  Ppe42 09:02, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This comment accompanies edit no. 65289710.
*The main section renamed to "Involvement in the Libertarianz party" --just having "Party" made it sound to me like Dalton was a member of "the party"---while it is obvious what party is being talked about, the emphasis on the Liberterianz Party should be removed.
*The reference to his becoming leader was moved down to the Party Involvement section.
*External links. The link to the party homepage removed (irrelevant to anyone wanting to know personal information about him---it can go on the party's article). The link to his profile retained.
Mr Bluefin 23:57, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit by [[User:Mr Bluefin|Mr Bluefin]] no. 65289710 
Talk:Chameleon (Helloween album)

message: Chameleon is definitely not a concept album, I am making this judgement based on the unrelated lyrics and the statements made by Weikath in the expanded edition's interview (the three main song-writing band members had almost no collaboration). I'm going to remove the statement. If someone has proof from somewhere, they should put it back up, but with a citation (kudos to whoever noted the lack of a citation). Xanofar (talk) 23:15, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Concept Album?

message: Hardly objective and with a lot of (attitude fueled text enclosed like this). Could someone improve the section to make it more neutral. Some citations would be nice too.--TheHande (talk) 11:58, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background section reads like a review 

message: Much of this article seems to be written more like a blog post or similar than an encyclopedia article. A lot of it needs to be rewritten. Liassica (talk) 15:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-encyclopedic tone
Talk:W. W. Samuell High School

message: Welcome. Good start. More reffing and topics for B. Pics? Victuallers 17:03, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Friends

message: Is one of the best schools in Dallas, Texas.
i like W.W. SAMUELL HIGH SCHOOOL  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.219.163.119 (talk) 17:46, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  W.W. Samuell High Dallas, Texas. 
Talk:Arpeggiator

message: It should be noted that arpeggiators make synthesizers much easier to play. Where would be without them?
"This creates an electronically created arpeggio."   Bit redundant, perhaps change to "This electronically creates an arpeggio."
:The whole thing was a pile of crap. I have basically rewritten it from scratch, with the exception of the majority of the opening paragraph, which was surprisingly decent. -Ashley Pomeroy 18:19, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Could someone please rephrase the opening paragraph. It is not clear what it is.
It should not say what it is a feature of or what it can be used with but first and
foremost WHAT IS A ARPEGGIATOR. THANKS -- 116.49.224.60 (talk) 06:12, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Better opening explanation
Talk:Linda Papadopoulos

message: I am not sure that she qualifies for this list.
Is this a puff piece written by herself? The changing of her age would seem to support that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.99.125.98 (talk) 23:04, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a bunch of stuff to be seen at Google Scholar about what she has published:   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuitan (talk • contribs) 12:35, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Career
Talk:Piano Concerto No. 20 (Mozart)

message: There are some performances on this concerto . you may buy them from ebay.com or amazon.com .
[shahriarplus@yahoo.com]
:Yes, there have been recordings since before 1940. Recordings regarded as perhaps notable (among performances from decades ago I expect there are several (Ingrid Haebler/Eduard Melkus, perhaps one of Wilhelm Kempff's and/or Walter Gieseking's (with Hans Rosbaud)? There's a recording with composer-pianist Carl Reinecke and Bruno Walter conducting the Vienna Philharmonic on the label (not the tempo :) ) Andante, I don't know how it's regarded.) Among somewhat more recent pianists who I believe recorded the concerto - I would assume well, but I haven't heard these recordings, I think- indeed, I'm not familiar with that many classic recordings of some repertoire - Claudio Arrau, Daniel Barenboim, and Alfred Brendel come to mind. And Ivan Moravec. Schissel | Sound the Note! 20:40, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

message: This is nonsense. This building was named "Die Mehlgrube".--91.113.59.143 (talk) 19:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Haus zur Mehlgrube"?
Talk:Sonjay Dutt

message: I think the mention of steroids ought to be removed, or at least deemed and stated to be kayfabe as it was said during an episode of Impact.
Unless there is actual proof of it...
--Madbassist 01:11, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Steroids

message: The article states that he was born in Washington, D.C. then goes on to suggest that he only came to USA as a child when his parents emigrated. Which is right? If it is a case of being born in America then moving back to India before returning then this should be made clear. Similarly if the 'born in Indis' bit is kayfabe this should also be made clear. As it stands, the article seems to be saying two contradictory things. Keresaspa 15:25, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction

message: Someone went into his profile, and changed "Dutt" to "Butt", It is now fixed.
(Spdk1 08:24, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spammed Page - Fixed
Talk:Scott D'Amore

message: Scott D'Amore is with JCW. I anybody wants proof, well here it is. SAVIOR_SELF.777 06:52, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Juggalo Championship Wrestling 

message: Why is The Canadian destroyer listed as his finisher? Can you really think that that fat gonk could possibly pull off a flip piledriver? He may have invented the move but theres no way he could pull it off himself The C of E (talk) 20:36, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Canadian Destroyer???? 

message: The article says he was born in 1972, but also says he was 16 in 1992. He would have actually been 16 in 1988 if he was born in 1972.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.153.181.30 (talk) 17:02, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age
Talk:Eddy Temple-Morris

message: I'm considering adding this page to the AfD, I'm not sure the subject is notable enough to warrant a wiki article. Thoughts? HumbleGod 19:00, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He was a presenter on MTV UK in the late 90s. Should be notable enough, I'll see what I can find. Oldelpaso 20:59, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete?
Talk:BGM (album)

message: Was just wondering. Wikipedia was no help today.--72.173.160.58 (talk) 00:37, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering the same myself. It's absurd that nearly three years have passed since this was posted and yet nobody's answered it. 71.237.139.71 (talk) 07:15, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anything to the symmetry in the length of the songs?
Talk:Neil Goldman (Family Guy)

message: This article originally contained information on both the Family Guy character Neil Goldman and the Family Guy (and Scrubs) writer Neil Goldman. As these are two different subjects, I've split them into two articles. The character is still here, the writer is under
Neil Goldman (writer). Just in case you're wondering where the info went. It might be appropriate, to avoid confusion, to move this article to Neil Goldman (Family Guy) or Neil Goldman (character) or something. --Gpollock 19:09, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In this case it would be very difficult to argue that one is more important than the other (whereas in the case of Miles O'Brien it's very easy to argue that the Star Trek character is better known). In my opinion, the preferred disambiguation parenthetical for the fictional character ought to be "(Family Guy)," since it's entirely possible that the writing staff of Scrubs might decide to create their own Neil Goldman character for that show. Cromulent Kwyjibo 21:02, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The real Neil Goldman
Talk:Byzas

message: There's something wrong with the following snippet:
"Zeus fell in love with Io, the daughter of Inachus, [...]. The King of the Gods temporarily transformed his beloved daughter into a heifer [...]."
Shouldn't the bolded "daughter" be "lover," based on the previous text?
--Graffitici 19:12, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Sugarfree

message: Sugarfree refers to at least two separate things - sugar substitutes and four bands, at least, with that name. I think that that should be examined before changing this edit. If anything, a link to the band page on wiki (which does exist but doesn't match its Italian wiki counterpart) needs to be included in the Sugar substitute page. Matsu 19:14, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

message: I have a dislike of sweet & sour tastes in food, viz. sweet & sour chicken etc. I would like to be able to neutralise the sweet aspect, by the introduction of an additive.82.15.4.76 12:10, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  sweet / sour foods
Talk:Sugarfree (Filipino band)

message: This article and its Italian counterpart definitely don't match. In fact, there's a lot more missing. Sugarfree refers also to an Italian, an Estonian, and a Chinese band all with the same name. I think that these need to either be addressed in this article, or separate articles for each of these bands should be made. Matsu 19:15, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Royal Rumble (2004)

message: Should it be noted that Chris Benoit is not on the past rumble winners list?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.67.7.141 (talk) 05:45, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No. It's already mentioned on the Benoit murder-suicide article that WWE removed almost all references on their site to him (though they seem to have put some back). TJ Spyke 06:06, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past Rumble Winners:Chris Benoit 

message: When I try to organize when each man was eliminated from the match in order from the first to final elimination, there's a bit of a hiccup. 
Currently on the screen when I sort the eliminations in order it goes:
5. Steiner
6. Kane
8. Rhyno
7. Spike Dudley 
9. Matt Hardy
10. René Duprée
I'd try to correct it but I don't want to screw up the table it's on. Anyone else, feel free to correct it if you know how. PopCultureMan (talk) 02:20, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filtered Order of Elimination