Talk:The Songlines

message: :Image:TheSonglinesBookCover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:TheSonglinesBookCover.jpg

message: Hi, i`m and i found in this article "Publication Date 1982" in the box on the right. My edition (Vintage 2003) says "First published in Great Britain by Jonathan Cape Ltd in 1987". Was it published before? Where? Would be nice if s/o got the answer.Thanks--84.169.227.211 (talk) 15:41, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Fantastic Fiction, it was published in 1987 by Jonathan Cape but therre was an earlier 1986 edition by Franklin Press, according to Abebooks, "for subscribers as part of their Signed First Editions series" GrahamHardy (talk) 13:25, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Published when? 

message: For the criticism section, or to further flush out what is fiction and what is not, I add this quote:
"Bruce... hadn't sat down with any Aborigine. He gets information second hand and repeats it. Aboriginal people are capable of dealing with the world in a philosophical way The problem was, he just wasn't there long enough, he didn't get involved at any depth."
Toly Sawenko (on whom the character Arkady is based), Bruce Chatwin: A Biography  by Nicholas Shakespeare p 490. 2001.
Charges of 'false' or 'mis' representations come from... social scientists and locals claiming to know the Aboriginal culture better than Chatwin, either because they rely on academically rigorous research, or because they have lived and worked with Aboriginal communities for a long time. In effect, The Songlines reveals that Chatwin is a poor anthropologist (his visit too brief, his ethnography too superficial) whose travel writing is limited by his Western, neocolonial privilege.
The Global Politics of Contemporary Travel Writing By Debbie Lisle p 64. 2006.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.203.83.137 (talk) 01:58, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The character of Arkady is based on Salman Rushdie as much as on any actual Russian-stock immigrant. Rushdie and Chatwin traveled around the outback in the early eighties and no doubt they discussed some of the ideas and stories of the novel during the writing process. And for the record, novelists and literary writers are under no obligation to "stick to the real-life truth" in what they write. Not even if their books feel as effortlessly real and observed from reality as The Songlines does in its Australian scenes (the first hundred pages include some of the most overpoweringly lifelike, convincing, atmospheric, hit-it-on-the-nail portrayals of those settings and their people that you're likely to find in any book). 83.254.154.164 (talk) 03:54, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can find reliable sources that point out the flaws in the book, feel free to add them here or to the article. Without sources, criticism is often removed on wikipedia.Dialectric (talk) 13:36, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  criticism section 

message: I've tagged this article for inappropriate tone and lack of sources. At the moment it reads like a English student's book review: rhetorical questions such as "What are we if not defined by our environment?" have no place in encyclopaedia articles and, as the above unsigned commentator states, "oldest living culture" is a claim which needs proof. It's not clear from the article whether the opinions are Chatwin's, or whether they belong to the article's author(s): the article needs to be about the book and sourced reactions to it, rather than being an abbreviated version of the book itself  ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 17:01, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags 

message: Any information about the genesis of the book? Chatwin's journey to Australia? Relation of journey and book?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.144.202.22 (talk) 01:31, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genesis