Talk:Pruneyard Shopping Center

message: I want to say that the section on constitutionality seems a little POV.  Anyone see that too or am I just being too picky?
:☭ Zippanova 19:04, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In what way? I don't see any POV aspects to it.  --Coolcaesar 19:11, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

text: This article is full of POV statements! It sounds like you are on the advertising board for the shopping center. This article needs some help!--69.227.160.24 05:46, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please state which particular assertions in the article are biased.  The article as a whole sounds unbiased and neutral to me.  It merely shows that California has this unusual free speech rule which has been upheld by the highest court in the land, but which most states disagree with.  --Coolcaesar 21:57, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Should we split the PruneYard vs. Robins section out into its own article? Right now, the article is mostly about the case and other legal issues, with the description of the actual shopping center somewhat stubish. Gentgeen 07:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, I am splitting the articles now into the proposed article titles. Anybody want to give feedback ? rkmlai (talk) 19:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split? 

message: Do we need all these photos? CosmicWaffles 20:06, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see anything wrong with them; they're all relevant, they all look all right,, and they illustrate the article.  Most Wikipedia articles need more illustration, not less!  --Coolcaesar 01:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: Please see WP:IG. Galleries aren't supposed to be used just to shoehorn in an indiscriminate amount of images. Do we really need five images of the same shopping center, especially in an article this short? Do you really think all five are encyclopedic images? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:46, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery 

message: I have yet to find a source, me the source maven, but I grew up near there, I even took classes in the tower.  My recollection of the origin of the towers is that Fred Sahadi had already planned to build these towers elsewhere, where I don't recall, but the plans were blocked.  He already had building materials either en route or on hand.  The purchase of the ranch adjacent to Campbell was a hasty option to find a new location for the building, in a location where the city council/planning commission was less forceful and possibly encouraging of development.  In fact Campbell at the time was feeling left out of the Dutch Hamann incursion into surrounding areas.  I have found nothing online, I don't have access to San Jose area newspaper archives of the day.  Next time I'm in San Jose I'll look.  I assume they do have the Mercury archive in a public library, if not other community papers.  I'm opening this up to see if anyone else can find the story and source it out. Trackinfo (talk) 04:41, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin 

message: At some point someone needs to get around to moving this article to "The Pruneyard."  It's been called that for a while. --Coolcaesar (talk) 07:08, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name changed