lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Portes du Soleil

message: Reads like an advert  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.42.124.178 (talk) 23:58, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Advert Alert

message: The following doesn't seem to read like a encylopedia should to me:
 Finally it should be noted that skiing the ciruit counterclockwise means having to either ski the famous La Chavanette also known as "Le Mur" or suffer the humiliation of taking the chairlift down. 87.113.14.121 (talk) 01:35, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Informality?
Talk:Nipponzan-Myōhōji-Daisanga

message: I think this page should be moved to Nipponzan Myōhōji Dai Sangha as it is listed by this title in the United Nations Department of Public Information - Non-Governmental Organizations Section. 1 Also Japanese Wikipedia entry uses "ja:日本山妙法寺大僧伽"
:Edit: It says the organization was renamed to this in 1953. Though official website is http://www.nipponzanmyohoji.org/ and retains 日本山妙法寺 so I'm not sure now.
::The short name is the one most widely used in the west, so best leave it be.  But why not add some text to give the long form too - this convention is widely used in Wiki.  --Concrete Cowboy 16:07, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: I've started the Nichidatsu Fujii article so that you can extend it. --Concrete Cowboy 16:07, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nichidatsu Fujii

message: Is "new religious" all that is meant by that, or something more? Шизомби (talk) 12:22, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "neo-" sounds like a judgement call so I've changed it to 'new' until someone can produce a citation for 'neo'. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:03, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Neo-religious"?
Talk:County of Edessa

message: Maybe this article was translated into the other language versions. I think this is not a good idea to translate poor referenced document. Can anybody clearly show where the contents of this article came from ? Jtm71 (talk) 04:35, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The usual crusade books; I know I used Mayer's "The Crusades", and probably Runciman. I don't know about the other people who have added things since then but there doesn't seem to be anything to objectionable. Sure it could use citations, but do you have any specific concerns? Adam Bishop (talk) 05:55, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Yeah, it does need references...we'll get to them someday! Adam Bishop (talk) 06:01, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  references or sources 

message: It appears that he was only gravely injured during a siege and he did not die in any battle. At least it is stated so elsewhere; he even led his army afterwards. (While he may have succumbed to his injuries later, I have no sources for this and anything to that effect would be a pure speculation on my side.) 84.47.92.60 (talk) 18:12, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joscelin I did not die in any battle 

message: This article was copy-edited by User:Mathijsvs on September 22, 2013. If my work has caused any factual errors, please contact me asap. Mathijsvs (talk) 11:21, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy-edit
Talk:Yugambeh language

message: Can anyone here help on the Nerang River page with exactly what "Neerang" means.  The references (as shown) say "little shark" etc, but would that mean the Bull shark (which I suspect inhabits the river), or just a small shark of an unspecified species?  -- Kevin Ryde 01:51, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neerang 

message: Okay, Yugambeh is a dialect of Bandjalang, which is a PN isolate, at the same time as being a Yuin–Kuric lang. Are there two Yugambeh's we're (I'm?) getting mixed up? — kwami (talk) 08:23, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I've sorted it out. — kwami (talk) 06:33, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  classification 
Talk:Boomer (Bubblegum Crisis)

message: THey are called VOOMERS!
:No, they are called Voomers in some translations; Boomer or Voomer is correct but when referring to the Crisis-verse 'Boomer' is more common. In the original Japanese dubs of Bubblegum Crisis, Crash and the AD Police OVA they were Boomers, when AD Police and Crash were translated by Manga Video they were called 'Voomers' but the dub of Crisis by AnimEigo kept 'Boomer.' ADV told their voice actors to say 'Boomer' in their dub of Crisis 2040. 
:See here.
:Besides, Voomer sounds like some kind of vacuum cleaner. :PHrimfaxi 12:38, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: VOOMERS!!!
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hinduism/Collaboration of the week

message: Let us know if you happen to pick an article on a person and we'll alert our members! plange 05:56, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Biography 

message: Somebody needs to create the archive page. --Bondego 17:44, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archive? 

message: and  have been nominated for deletion -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 07:09, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Templates
Talk:Ōita Prefecture

message: I've moved the page from Oita Prefecture to Ōita Prefecture as per the guidlines on WP:MOS-JP. I've also corrected all the double redirects. Bobo12345 11:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Macronising 

message: To my knowledge (which is pretty good as I actually live here in Oita-ken), Oita is not famous for it's horse meat. That claim to fame belongs to nearby province Kumamoto. Does anyone have a claim to back this statement up?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.237.151.1 (talk) 01:16, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horse meat 

message: "Visitors particularly relish the effects of burial in steaming hot volcanic sands."
Burial is... not the right word here. And this sentence is hilarious.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.236.240.156 (talk) 12:56, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Tourism
Talk:Axe historique

message: I would recommend removing the current image of the "Arc de Triomphe du Carrousel." It is clearly photoshopped and misleading. There is no grass on the side of the arch that would allow one to see Concorde. Moreover, only the obelisque is visible to the naked eye, as the Arc de Triomphe and Le Grand Arche are way to far away.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.123.152.165 (talk) 09:02, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Almondsbury Interchange

message: :A map could be useful, but I am unsure how much it would really show. I can try and get a picture, however I don't really think that would show much - and for that matter I can hardly walk on the Motorway(s) ust to get a nice shot! Ian13/talk 19:59, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Request removed Kmusser 03:12, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:South Park Conservatives

message: Would evangelical left be the ideological antithesis to the South Park conservatives?  It seems that much of South Park conservatives would be more liberal on social issues like abortions or pornography and conservative on war/peace, social welfare and economic matters.  Evangelical Left would probably be the flip side on each and every issue listed above. --JNZ 00:39, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evangelical Left as Ideological 180 from South Park Conservatives? 
Template talk:3-view

message: Sometimes this template is applied with the second parameter left blank, which results in rather horrible text for the image (there's a stray "", see e.g. this old version). If the second parameter is left blank, can we just set the template to use the generic word "aircraft" instead? Or alternatively, just display "Orthographically projected diagram" and leave out the "of the"? TheGrappler (talk) 02:08, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Template amended. Thanks for pointing this out. ericg ✈ 21:32, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What to do if the second parameter is left blank
Talk:WJTC

message: I have moved this page back to WJTC from WJTC-TV. Consensus on both WP:NC#Broadcasting and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations#Article_names is that the article name should reflect the actual call letters of the TV station. As can be seen here:  the call letters for this station are in fact WJTC. Any concerns regarding this topic would be best addressed here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations. (Most of this notice was copied from similar notices used by A.) Morgan Wick 00:48, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Talk:Enterprise information integration

message: I propose deleting the list of "solutions vendors" on the grounds that Wikipedia is not a link repository.  And that the list is simply a magnet for spam. —Veyklevar 01:00, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: List of "Solutions Vendors"

message: Anybody who has a history of the term or its evolution? That'd be valuable for people like me ;-) --207.47.11.17 21:16, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History/Evolution
Wikipedia talk:Protected Userpage

message: === Support ===
#Support as creator. The Gerg 21:59, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I may just change the policy to restrict just anons from editing them. The Gerg 15:05, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion/Poll 

message: #Support as creator. The Gerg 21:59, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Support 

message: # I believe that this policy might work, with the following exceptions: 1) people are allowed to make minor spelling or grammar corrections to others' userpages 2) barnstars and other awards may be presented. Also, editing another's userpage shouldn't be completely locked out (technically), but there could be a bot that automatically reverts all changes that do not have a certain syntax (e.g. typing "changing another's userpage - blah blah blah" in the edit summary). If it does have the syntax, then the bot can list the diff on a log, and patrollers can review and remove listings in the log. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:10, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Support with modifications 

message: #Oppose this proposal but not necessarily its content. A new proposal is the wrong way to go about this; it's sufficient simply to refine the wording already found at Wikipedia:User pages#Ownership and editing of pages in the user space. Feel free to strengthen the language found there as you see fit. This is a wiki; be bold. If you are reasonably moderate then I doubt anyone will object. There is no need to treat this as a change in policy; we already manage user pages in this way, generally speaking. If you have a specific dispute with a specific editor who edited your user page; or perhaps you simply don't want anybody to edit it, ever, then it's easy enough to resolve this. If you need help then please feel free to talk to me or request admin assistance. John Reid 04:44, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oppose 

message: #Neutral – I would support if user subpages were not protected, but cannot do so as the proposal stands. I would also prefer it to be a guideline rather than a policy – Gurch 08:23, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral 

message: See Wikipedia:User pages#Ownership and editing of pages in the user space for the current guidelines relating to editing user pages. I disagree slightly with the both versions as they stand, and I prefer the WP:USER version at the moment. Things I would like to change about this page:
* Guideline not policy
* Non-admins should be allowed to edit user pages.
SeventyThree(Talk) 20:23, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I may just change the policy to restrict just anons from editing them. The Gerg 15:05, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: As the proposal has been running for over a month and is currently at 43 oppose vs 38 support(s), it looks clear that this is not going to pass, so I will take the liberty of marking this proposal as  Regards, MartinRe 10:52, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mark as rejected
Talk:Le Tigre (album)

message: How is this electroclash?  I haven't heard their more recent albums, but this one certainly isn't and shouldn't be listed as such. Epigrammed (talk) 00:36, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 
Talk:STX (sports manufacturer)

message: I added the infobox but I could not find some information and we still need the logo.--Yarnalgo 01:16, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, nice job. It's hard finding a logo due to all that license and copyrighting crap one has to deal with. I'm working on it...--Osbus 02:31, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yay, I got the image. --Osbus 22:36, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good job! --Yarnalgo 22:58, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Osbus 

message: What about the ASCII character STX? It is 2 in Hex and in ASCII.70.70.146.32 (talk) 17:40, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  STX 

message: How come looking up "STX" brings to the page of this relatively minor company instead of the giant korean company of the same name which is probably 100 times bigger?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.37.41.63 (talk) 20:07, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  That's the main STX??? 

message: I would like to propose an update to the file shown for STX's brand logo. The current logo shown on the page is the brand's wordmark (black text reading STX). The file is low resolution and includes a white background. I have a hi-res, transparent background version of the file in SVG that could be used to replace it.
With that said, the wordmark is not the primary logo for STX; the brand predominantly uses a version of the logo with white text on a red background. I have an SVG file for this logo option, if that is preferred. Do any more tenured Wikipedia admins have advice and/or direction around which format is preferred? WalthamWatchman (talk) 17:04, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  STX Lacrosse Logo
Talk:David Manker Abshire

message: Heey,
I worked on the structure a bit and added some information's, especially before his political career started. If anyone wants, he can do this for his military career. Greetings to the Wiki-community :) --Princheeseanastasia (talk) 14:13, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure
Talk:The Dark Knight (film)

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:The Dark Knight (film) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 05:15, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Quasi-arithmetic mean

message: I noticed that the spelling of this page has changed and been reverted.
I don't care which spelling is chosen, but it's distinctly odd to have this page spelled generalised f-mean while another page is spelled generalized mean, especially since the latter was apparently chosen over the more common name "power mean" especially to parallel this page. (And note the spelling "generalized f-mean" in that article.) 63.150.32.42 01:23, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't it matter that Kolmogorov wrote paper about this mean in 1930?.. Infovarius (talk) 14:11, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

message: I found this
:M_f(x_1,\dots,x_k,x_{k+1},\dots,x_n) = M_f(\underbrace{m,\dots,m}_{k \mbox{ times}},x_{k+1},\dots,x_n)
: 
I changed it to this:
:M_f(x_1,\dots,x_k,x_{k+1},\dots,x_n) = M_f(\underbrace{m,\dots,m}_{k \text{ times}},x_{k+1},\dots,x_n)
: 
The size mismatch in the subscript under the underbrace resulted from use of \mbox where \text should have been used.  That's one of several problems with that particular uncouth usage. Michael Hardy (talk) 18:22, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  proper use of [[TeX]]
Talk:Shana Hiatt

message: *Should this be included in this WikiProject, because she is arguably one of the most well-known poker hosts and can fall into this WikiProject. --PandoraX (talk to me) 09:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Poker]]
Talk:Aube (musician)

message: They are about the same band, so they should be merged. --日本穣 Nihonjoe 01:37, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Someone edited the page to indicate that Aube has died. Substantiation of this? 71.206.234.237 (talk) 21:48, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead
Wikipedia talk:Concordia/Elections/Registration

message: T. J. Day
:IMO, this user is not eligible as he/she is additional election staff. Computerjoe's talk
::Let them vote, but if they come into being active election staff, their vote can be deducted - • The Giant Puffin • 
:::Won't this create a conflict of interest? Anyway, leave it upto active election staff. Computerjoe's talk
::::OK, remove them from voting, but I assume they can re-enter if they remove themselves from election staff? - • The Giant Puffin •
Ruling: T. J. Day is allowed to participate in the voting if he remains inactive as an election staff member until the end of voting.  If he remains inactive as an election staff member, he will be able to vote after the voting deadline by casting his vote on my talk page.  Because he has listed himself as inactive election staff, he will not be able to participate in the tallying of the votes, even if one member becomes inactive.  If both me and the other member of election staff become unresponsive when it is time to tally the votes, he will verify votes and determine the winner, after he has nullified his own votes.  -zappa.jake (talk)
Hi - I'm happy to do either. Of course, if I'm on the election staff I won't be eligible to vote. I put my name down on both because I was the third person (two are needed) to put my name down as election staff; I thought I'd put my name down in case I was preferable to either of the others, whereas if not, I'd like to vote. If I had the choice between election staff and having a vote, I'd prefer to be election staff because at the moment I don't have any strong opinions upon which to base my vote. I apologise for wasting others' time by causing confusion. T. J. Day 04:16, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: T. J. Day
Talk:Kinesiotherapy

message: Occupational therapy and kinesiotherapy are completely different programs.  It would be unfair to both organizations to combine them on one page.
I Agree with you 100% -- They are very different.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.228.194.248 (talk) 22:11, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: then add something to the article to make it clear what the difference is (and preferably include citations, professional bodies, examining boards, etc.) Gabrielbodard (talk) 20:11, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: (untitled)

message: This seems quite similar to physical therapy. Either we should explain the difference or we should merge the two articles. At present there's not even a link between the two. Eric Kvaalen (talk) 13:44, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. This comes from a translation discrepancy. In France & Belgium, Physical therapists are called Kinesiotherapists. In French-speaking Switzerland and Quebec, those professionals are called Physical therapists. To complicate things further, French people believe that Physiotherapy is a subset of Kinesiotherapy. Merge and explain ;) NicDumZ ~ 06:33, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Template talk:User ships

message: As I have addressed over on  the image that this template currently uses is not licensed correctly.  It is listed as public domain when it appears to be copyrighted.  Also the image is an exact duplicate of :Image:TITANC.GIF (which happens to be licensed correctly under fair use).  The problem is that userboxes are not permitted to use images that are not under a free use license.  So I'd like to bring it to the attention of anyone that may use this userbox so that an alternative image may be selected.  Personally I've chosen :Image:Bark.png but I want to see what other think.  -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 01:54, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: problems with the Image
Talk:Paul Zimmerman (sportswriter)

message: As with the Peter King entry, I think there's too much discussion of the web column and way too little about the rest of his career.  Zimmerman is one of the great writers in football history, and frankly his web column is more of an interesting footnote to that career than anything else.  His body of work is underrepresented here, and this entry makes him look like little more than a blogger.  I've added a little bit on his other career, but this entry is still out of balance.  --Sportswriter 01:58, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overemphasis on Web Column

message: There is also a blatant factual error: Zimmerman is still on the Hall of Fame selection committee.  He resigned, I believe, from the senior selection committee, the body that selects older players that have exited the window of their original eligibility.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Wideeyedraven (talk • contribs) 18:32, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's exactly what the article says in the last paragraph Anson2995 16:58, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Yes, thankfully, now it does.  Before it was different.  Check the previous versions.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Wideeyedraven (talk • contribs) 22:05, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: HOF Selection Committee

message: This article needs a general NPOV brushup, and I have tagged it as such.  I removed some blatantly POV statements but will leave it up to others who are more familiar with this guy to polish it up some more. ♣♦ SmartGuy ♥♠ 15:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow. This article currently is more of a critical essay than an encyclopedic entry, which violates both NPOV and Original Research.  I like Dr. Z as much as anyone, but this is absolutely inappropriate for Wikipedia.  If you publish this stuff as a scholarly article, then you can cite it, but for now, this has to be removed. Slurms MacKenzie 07:43, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: After considerable revision and citation, I have removed the tags.  The article seems much less prone to blatant POV and textual critique after several months of cleanup, wikify, and NPOV revisions.  Historymike (talk) 03:53, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of POV and citation tags
Talk:Roll film

message: Eastman is credited with inventing it. I've also heard David Houston mentioned, 1881....  Trekphiler 19:15, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And I seriously doubt these guys were involved.  TREKphiler hit me ♠  05:31, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

message: The article is called "Roll film." Then we get a long paragraph extolling the virtues of Houston, who invented a camera to use said film. That is, there's nothing here about how it works, or who invented it; and to say Houston invented a roll film camera constitutes weasel wording, in my humble opinion. The article on George Eastman says he invented it, so there's a contradiction here which needs sorting out, I would say. I will delete much of the Houston material as irrelevant unless I hear back from someone in a month or so. Theonemacduff (talk) 22:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictions and weasel words