lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Grad–Shafranov equation

message: I removed the tag.  Feel free to add it back, but please leave some specific suggestions as to how the article could be improved.  Lunch 02:41, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "too technical" tag

message: I add a derivation in contravariant coordinates, it is simple and intuitive. It utilizes the contravariant basis with the definition of Professor Roscoe White. If there still be questions, plz comment. AllenChengBuaa (talk) 17:36, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Derivation Added
Talk:Habenula

message: Needs a photo, diagram or something. RJFJR 13:52, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Image added, habenula not directly labelled but area is much easier to visualize now.--killing sparrows 10:36, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs photo

message: I've added a bunch of (referenced!) info and rearranged a little. There is much more to be said about the habenula, but I don't have time to say it all.
The only main thing I've removed is the claim that habenula does not project to the pineal gland: Rønnekleiv and Møller (1979) apparently found a connection, or so suggests section 2.2.1 in the Lecourtier and Kelly reference. If someone wants to add that claim back in, please include a reference for it.
I also removed the claim that the habenula is the only nucleus in the epithalamus. The page on the epithalamus does not seem to agree (though it has no references). Feel free to re-add if the claim can be supported in a reference. (am user User:Digfarenough, but am too lazy to sign in) -- 128.197.81.180 (talk) 20:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  more stuff 

message: * Link between habenula and deep depression
Hi! I'm not a specialist and I'm not sure if this news can be useful for this article, so I prefer the usual editors of this article to decide. I believe that it would be useful to include at least some abstract like "Some studies demonstrated the important role that habenula plays in certain kinds of deep depresions", and a reference to this news or the original article. Perhaps, even a reference to Dr. Sartorius hypothesis can be included.
http://esciencenews.com/articles/2010/01/08/deep.brain.stimulation.successful.treatment.severely.depressive.patient
Pmronchi (talk) 01:55, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  News 

message: Support the August proposal to merge Habenular nuclei to Habenula. In modern use, they are the same structure, and historical differences in the terms are readily covered in the first sentence. So, merge to solve the duplication. Klbrain (talk) 21:10, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Klbrain. They are indeed the same structure. -- Athikhun.suw (talk) 22:49, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

text: Support merge. Icabobin (talk) 15:47, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 17:50, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Heliometer

message: The image described as 'Double image of the solar disk' is misleading. A vertical cut of the lens and the vertical shift of one half would produce a figure of two disks shifted vertically (overlapping like here, or touching). The illustration should look like a digit 8. A horizontal displacement is an error. --CiaPan (talk) 08:13, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The split objective lens is rotatable and does not have to align vertically. This is not so important for the sun, but if you want to measure the separation of two stars you need to be able to align the lens cut with those stars. --Wrongfilter (talk) 16:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in illustration
Talk:Millo

message: This article doesn't claim anything that is not in the Bible verses it cited.  Do these count as a reliable source, or is some other verification needed?  What if it were reworded "According to the Bible, Millo is a fortification built by King Solomon?"  --Et764 21:39, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a line in the introduction, "referred to in the Hebrew Bible". - BobKilcoyne (talk) 05:45, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification 

message: Reasonable people may want to see more evidence before deciding what the Large Stone Structure is.  But the photo and details form Mazar's dig make it pretty clear that we can finally resolve the puzzle over the nature of the Stepped Stone Structure and its identity with the Millo.  It/they were the support structure for the Large Stone Structure.   We should merge them.  And hope to learn what/when the Large Stone Structure is as the dig progresses.Broad Wall (talk) 13:30, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Millo is a subject in its own right and anyone looking for information on it would probably not think to look under "Large Stone Structure", even if they knew about the latter. Likewise, anyone looking for information on Eilat Mazar's discovery would not think to look under "Millo".
KendallKDown (talk) 07:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Keep separate
Talk:Hyporheic zone

message: Reviewers - Is this still too technical? Which bits exactly?
Experts - Is this still a good representation of the facts?
131.111.16.20 (talk) 11:55, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added the synonym "underflow" which should be equivalent of "hyporheic flow". Although in Environmental Dictionary 2004 (http://mot.kielikone.fi/mot/endic/netmot.exe?UI=fied&height=165) it is referred as follows: "movement of water through a pervious stratum under the bed of a river. Maybe there are any nuances about it"--Bioneer1 (talk) 20:09, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Underflow or hyporheic flow 

message: The following observations and suggestions for improvements were collected, following expert review of the article within the Science, Tecnology, Society and Wikipedia course at the Politecnico di Milano, in June 2020.
I did find the article (in the English version and in its Italian counterpart) meaningful and including appropriate referencing. I spotted a minor inconsistency (Habit instead of Habitat) and, other than this one, the use of English is appropriate. I am not entirely sure about the third picture in the gallery, as it depicts fish, whose connection with the organisms living within the hyporheic region is not entirely clear. There is a nice balance between technical and popular terminology, thus making the article accessible to a wide audience.
Majorett (talk) 17:28, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Observations and suggestions for improvements
Talk:Katanin

message: Does someone have a citation for where the name came from?  For that matter, is there some website that collects "official" stories of the things after which genes and proteins are often rather creatively named? Jimw338 (talk) 22:06, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cite for origin of name? 

message: This end of the neuron functions section makes no sense, on a couple of levels:
Microtubules break into fibroblasts after slight bending. But, when katanin is present, the bending can lead to breakage because it enhances the access of katanin to the lattice.[6]
The citation link is dead.
173.25.54.191 (talk) 21:21, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsense
Talk:Daihatsu Copen

message: soooo... what's the economy difference between the two versions? i'm not personally that bothered, but i do note the figure for the 660cc original is given in indeterminate (US or imperial?) "mpg", and that for the later 1300 is in L/100km...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.180.56 (talk) 01:51, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1996 in rail transport

message: Lijn 1 (TGV) Y Antoing - grens - 13.7km - in dienst 02.06.1996
http://users.pandora.be/brail/lijn/lijn1.htm
2 juin 1996 - Mise en service commercial du tronçon Frethun (k 113,7) - frontière belge (km 209,7) près Wannehain - Antoing (km ). Thalys : Paris-Bruxelles 2h03.
http://www.laviedurail.com/culturerail/histoire/chronologie/chronologie_tgv01.php?SID=20060930112207FFF4D5B9
Le 2 juin 1996 ouverture de la section Wannehain - Esplechin - Raccordement d'Antoing de la ligne Ligne 1.
http://trains.wikia.com/wiki/Chronologie
BLN 782.0274][FR][BE] Lille (Triangle de Frétin) - Wannehain SNCF - Espléchin SNCB - Antoing: (BLN 770.027, 772.069, 779.0212; Ball 7B1) From 2 June 1996 the Paris - Bruxelles service comprises Thalys TGVs leaving the LGV Nord just outside Lille and bringing into passenger use the west-to-east chord at Frétin plus this first part of the new high-speed line across the border, before returning to ordinary SNCB tracks at Antoing and making a detour south-east via Mons. Meanwhile London - Bruxelles Eurostars stick to their conventional Lille - Blaindain - Tournai route until more of the LGV Belge is ready.
http://ccl.kuleuven.be/~corn/blnews96.html
La LGV Nord, ou ligne nouvelle 3 (LN3), est une ligne à grande vitesse française de 333 km de long reliant Paris à la frontière belge et au tunnel sous la Manche via Lille, mise en service en 1993.
* 23 mai 1993 : mise en service d'un premier tronçon entre Paris (bifurcation de Gonesse) et Arras.
* 26 septembre 1993 : mise en service d'un deuxième tronçon entre Arras (bifurcation de Croisilles) et Calais.
* 2 juin 1996 : mise en service du dernier tronçon entre Lille (triangle de Fretin) la frontière belge.
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGV_Nord
Wdew (talk) 21:50, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: June 2 - 1st part of the Belgian High Speed Line put into service
Talk:Podosome

message: I will be editing and expanding this page under the supervision of Dr. Lesly Temesvari (Username: LTEMESV) at Clemson University.
Jturbev (talk) 03:54, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is an insteresting source cited (number five) to back up the statement about Tks5 and WASP being unique to these structures and therefore used in the imaging of these structures. The paper that is cited does not, however, state this. It doesn't even mention the terms Tks5 and WASP... 128.214.144.33 (talk) 08:20, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed to verify
Talk:QBD (electronics)

message: # Add references to Qbd from published technical papers.
# Add a chart object to illustrate Qbd spreads in a production lot.
DFH (talk) 16:01, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested improvements 

message: Strictly speaking, shouldn't the expression for Qbd be compensated for the capacitative charge? i.e. Subtract Q = C.V where C is the gate capacitance and V is the voltage just before breakdown? DFH (talk) 16:35, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capacitance correction?
Talk:Situlogy

message: This article, like pretty much all of the other psycho-, meta-, ultra-, hyper-, blah blah blah articles related to art, is useless. It does not explain its subject with anything more than quotes containing selective, subjective, and nigh-meaningless jargon, and doesn't contain any images or external links which provide examples of what it's talking about. --Halloween jack 00:59, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Spiroplasma

message: Compared to what it was when tagged for cleanup  it has improved vastly. Good job everyone! (removing cleanup tag) -- ∞Wirelain 16:29, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup tag 

message: Is there any treatment for patients who are suspected to be infected by this organism?
Bwrs (talk) 23:04, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  diagnosis and treatment? 

message: Forgive my ignorance please. I think the answer to this question is so important I'm willing to look foolish.
Is it possible the prions in question are in the spiroplasma or culture? That would make the prion model likely and still confirm the teams response with the spiroplasma experiment.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.145.186.46 (talk) 00:43, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions:
Talk:Subway (underpass)

message: The sign in the second image is not, as previously indicated, a warning (which would be a red-bordered triangle) but a prohibition (red-bordered circle). The "Weak subway" part is (by virtue of its rectangular shape) information. -- Picapica 22:19, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prohibition, not warning 

message: For the American definintion, I chose both an official (CalTrans) and an unofficial (Usenet post from June 25, 1998, Message ID 4ohk1.19555$dn.17141012@news.rdc2.occa.home.com ) citation for the term.  I'm not sure, though, if the term is currently used. Mapsax 20:55, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Speaking about California, I know the Sacramento Amtrak station uses the term "subway" to refer to their passageway under the tracks (some of them now a parking lot). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jmchuff (talk • contribs) 08:12, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  California 

message: There was such an underpass in Toledo, Ohio, by the Toledo Zoo, to cross under a main highway and railroad. It was called a "Subway" and had a logo to that effect on the buildings at each end of the passageway. One building is still extant as is the passageway, but it is now used for storage. The remainig building was removed during a zoo expansion that included the building of a pedestrian bridge to replace the old underpass. There is a marker describing this on the bridge facing the remaining building.134.243.211.185 (talk) 16:21, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subway in Toledo 

message: When they are built, the term pedestrian underpass is more likely to be used, since the word "subway" is 
most commonly used in the US
to refer to rail-based rapid transit systems
that are mostly underground,
such as the New York Subway.-96.237.79.6 (talk) 03:48, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  SUBWAY in US is mostly UNDERGROUND transit system 

message: Subways may also be constructed for the benefit of wildlife, ranging from quite small for reptiles and amphibians (turtles and frogs) to big enough for larger mammals.-96.237.79.6 (talk) 03:49, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  wide range of wildlife subways 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Underpass and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 23#Underpass until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  MB 20:13, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Underpass" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Shorty Rogers

message: More info at Find-A-Grave, you can find his date of death there too. Lincher 22:04, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Will Rogers Jr.

message: Is this the same fellow at Find-A-Grave. Lincher 22:07, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Will add link to bio.  Rlquall 21:15, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Find-A-Grave's entry

message: There have been four Democratic U.S. Congressmen:
*Oklahoma Congressman Will Rogers (1898-1983)
*California Congressman William Vann Rogers, Jr. (1911-1993) is the son of the famous humorist Will Rogers
*New York Congressman William Findlay Rogers (1820-1899) 
*New Hampshire Congressman William Nathaniel Rogers (1892-1945) 
OCNative 03:14, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple Congressmen Will Rogers
Template talk:GeorgiaUS-school-stub

message: Georgia is extremely ambiguous, considering that the non-US-state Georgia has schools. 132.205.46.156 22:08, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for spotting this ambiguity; but, for your vote to count, I believe you need to have a Wikipedia account... Regards, David Kernow 14:52, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  That would be incorrect, and also against policy of having an encyclopedia anyone can edit. The weight of my vote is lower due to my anonymity. As I am the nominator, this is just a pro-forma vote anyways. 132.205.45.110 21:01, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 07:40, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:RM (22nd March 2006) &rarr; TEMPLATE:Georgia-state-school-stub

message: *MOVE 132.205.46.156 22:08, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for spotting this ambiguity; but, for your vote to count, I believe you need to have a Wikipedia account... Regards, David Kernow 14:52, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  That would be incorrect, and also against policy of having an encyclopedia anyone can edit. The weight of my vote is lower due to my anonymity. As I am the nominator, this is just a pro-forma vote anyways. 132.205.45.110 21:01, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 07:40, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes and discussion
Talk:Ruth Roman

message: It is different than the one at Find-A-Grave. Lincher 22:12, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. But it matches her page at IMDB -  - not that that's necessarily correct, but it is a good rough guide. I always thought she was born 23 Dec 1923, but the 22 Dec 1922 date gets lots of Google hits. There are also a few for 22 Dec 1923. We really need something authoritative to make sure. -- JackofOz (talk) 01:52, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth

message: First spouse name in article is different than shown in summary window. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.27.230.232 (talk) 14:41, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Spouse

message: Since "Norma" is an obvious anagram of "Roman," there is a chance that
"Norma Roman" was made up and not really her true birth name.Lestrade (talk) 00:12, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Finninpoika (talk) 00:33, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, Mortimer Hall was not her first husband. Jack Flaxman was, i.e. this reference. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 20:24, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family
Talk:Universal one-way hash function

message: This article needs to be improved.
Here are just a few places where the current article is confusing and contradicting:
* In cryptography a Universal One Way Hash Function (UOWHF), ..., is a cryptographic hash function.
That's already wrong. One of the advantages of UOWHF is that they have weaker assumptions than cryptographic hash functions, hence UOWHF need not necessarily be cryptographic hash functions.
* Collision Resistant Hash Functions (CRHF) are based on the stronger assumption that finding a collision in hash function is impossible.
Again, wrong. If the hash function is secure then it is only infeasible to find collisions not impossible.
* Any cryptographic system based on CRHF is considered to be less secure.
Less secure than what?
* UOWHFs are based on weaker assumption that finding a collision in t time units with probability \epsilon is impossible, known as (t,\epsilon)-UOWHF's.
This seems to describe a cryptographic hash function. If I understand it correctly, then UOWHFs require some form of 2nd preimage resistance and not collision resistance.
* And collision resistance is achieved by applying hash functions several time from this family.
I can't find such a theorem in the papers given as reference.
* These functions need keys to operate on them.
Again, I can't find any reference for using keys in the definition given by Naor and Yung.
* In CRHF the adversary wins the game once he finds a collision pair.
Taken out of context.
* Assuming CRHF and designing hash functions based on that would be a costly mistake.
Confusing. Why would it be a mistake to design a collision resistant CRHF?
* The security bound is 2^n when the output length is n.
This is unclear, because it is taken out of context.
* In UOWHF the adversary does not win for any collision. He has to specify a state, say S, and then he gets the key K. He now has to find a collision for the specified S and h_K.
Again, unclear because the role of the keys has not been specified.
* To achieve higher order UOWHF at the same time.
Undefined. What are higher order UOWHFs?
* UOWHF is used for achieving secure signatures.
Unclear. Does that mean if UOWHFs exist then a secure signature scheme exists or does it mean that some signature schemes in use today are based on UOWHFs?
85.2.41.214 13:06, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing and contradicting 

message: * The UOWHF family contains a finite number of hash functions with each having the same probability of being used.
Used for what?
84.226.6.172 (talk) 17:08, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing and contradicting, continued
Talk:Ludlow (town), Vermont

message: The village and the town are two separate places according to the US Census. While I agree that some disambiguation would be a good idea (perhaps including links from one to the other) the census bots seem to create both. If we do go ahead and merge them, we shoudl do this for all the other town/village combinations in Vermont and possibly elsewhere. Jessamyn (talk) 22:12, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I'd say no to the merge

message: I Like how all the separte countie subdivisions can be seen on this state map. but it would look better if there were lines on the map that showed county line boundares
99.51.212.6 (talk) 06:06, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  more detail on state map needed
Talk:Blanche Roosevelt

message: The date of birth differs from the on at Find-A-Grave. Lincher 22:20, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would trust the "Who Was Who in the D'Oyly Carte" website.  It's an extremely well-researched website.  Although her gravestone gives her year of birth as 1858, it is likely that she fibbed about her age.  It is highly unlikely that she make a Covent Garden debut at age 17. -- Ssilvers 14:50, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth?
Talk:Gotcha Force

message: I'm not sure if this qualifies as a npov violation, but is the statement "but almost all of the gamers who played the game consider it one of the greatest GameCube titles in existence" verifiable?  I would be curious to see if there was a consensus on that...CharacterZero 22:22, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: npov violation?

message: Looking the page over, I noticed " Rumors of a Gotcha Force 2 abound.". Are there really rumors? and if they are, are they caused by eager fans, or is it a little bit more based on facts. Cause if not, it really should be deleted. Moon Stone 22:25, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: rumors?
Talk:Transparent Armor Gun Shield

message: What does this have to do with anything?:
''
""Our TAGS units provide an additional level of protection from small arms fire and IED fragments," said Paul Para, BAE Systems' program manager. "TAGS enables direct vision, situational awareness and target acquisition for the gunner.""
 BAE SYSTEMS DELIVERS 1,000 TRANSPARENT ARMORED GUN SHIELDS FOR HMMWVS UNDER A U.S. ARMY TACOM CONTRACT press release @ BAE SYSTEMS North America
- Rudykog 22:22, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:David Rose (songwriter)

message: Would anyone object to renaming this article David Rose (songwriter) and bringing the disambiguation page to the fore?  — TPX 21:27, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I will proceed to move this page shortly.  — TPX 18:17, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

text: Done.  — TPX 20:35, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Rose (disambiguation) 

message: "They had no children, though Garland, according to biographer Gerald Clarke, underwent at least one abortion during the marriage, at the insistence of her mother, her husband, and her motion picture studio, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer." There is no citation for Clarke's book here, but even if there was, this statement seems dangerously close to slander if it isn't qualified more. Challenges to Clarke's book have been made since the day it was published; please see https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/books/042700clarke-book-review.html Pinikadia 19:54, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with "Personal Life" section