Talk:List of combat vehicles of World War I

message: With 85.75.87.100/21, it goes back to 11 April 2018. I am going to block that range for a good long while. I also just blocked 94.65.156.214. Y'all let me or another admin know if this continues: I'm sure you've had it up to here with this disrupter. Drmies (talk) 18:12, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , making contact as requested, our same friend has returned under a new IP () and has continued their campaign by inserting their same unsourced content.  All of this content has been discussed at length above.  Kind regards, Cavalryman (talk) 03:21, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks ; 85.72.100.0/23 is now blocked also. Drmies (talk) 15:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

text: I tried to roll them all back, saying "longterm disruption: unverified edits.See also Talk:List_of_combat_vehicles_of_World_War_I#As_for_that_IP..."--but it seems my rollback is broken. So please revert as you see fit. Drmies (talk) 15:17, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks. Kind regards, Cavalryman (talk) 19:30, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hey Drmies, do you think you could range block the /64 of the last IP you blocked over this issue? See Special:Contributions/2A02:2149:87A4:1D00:1468:1BEB:BE71:29D9/64. Thanks! Aoi (青い) (talk) 22:32, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure! Drmies (talk) 02:52, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you! Aoi (青い) (talk) 03:02, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

text: Apologies , one more (). Kind regards, Cavalryman (talk) 09:37, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

text: , thank you very much. I was mid-way through drafting an SPI when I noticed NinjaRobotPirate had already banned , the parallels between this IP user’s language and behaviour and that of  is apparent. If you would like I am happy to submit an SPI. Kind regards, Cavalryman (talk) 05:39, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: As for that IP...

message: WP:RS sets out what counts as a reliable source. Discussions within forums are not considered so, and shouldn't be quoted as such. If a forum post says "X is Y according to such-and-such-book"  then the source cited in the article for X =Y should be the book not the forum.GraemeLeggett (talk) 05:59, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree fully. Although further, there needs to be sufficient information to provide (or obtain elsewhere) full bibliographic information so as to ensure the citation is WP:Verifiable. Additionally, if said forum discussion includes statements like “a number of inaccuracies and suspicious things made me think about the incompetence of the author and the credibility of his text”, it should not be used. Cavalryman V31 (talk) 00:54, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the subject of reliable sources and forums 

message: Potential content fork at Draft:List of ground battle vehicles of world war one which I declined. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:33, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks , that is extraordinary, they have copied all of the entries and the citations from here (jigging the format somewhat) and added all of the vehicles that are consistently being re-added (despite considerable discussion above) by the a repeatedly banned IP abuser. I might request a checkuser of . Cavalryman (talk) 20:57, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another draft 

message: all will have red links or no one will have red links and not only the British  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2noname2 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello , as I explained to you on your talk page, per WP:REDNOT we try not to create redlinks to subjects that are unlikely to warrant their own articles, most of the entries you have given redlinks to barely have sufficient sources to be included here as a mention. As far as I can tell prior your additions there was only one redlink already on the page, I would support its removal. Cavalryman (talk) 22:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Another problem is in ending up inventing article names for these vehicles, on which sources are sketchy. GraemeLeggett (talk) 07:08, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  about the removal of red links by Cavalryman