lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Zirconium alloys

message: The compositions of the alloys list a small amount of hafnium.  Is this added on purpose or is this meant to reflect the hafnium impurity in commercial zirconium?  If it is the latter, perhaps it should be removed from the formula.  --Pyrochem 03:03, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Zircaloy

message: What I had heard on  television  had souned like zircoloid, zirculoid; what I found on  websites is  fuel cladding.
 hopiakuta  Please do  sign  your  signature  on your  message.  %7e%7e   Thank You. - 00:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[ zircaloy ]][[ zircalloy ]] 

message: This needs a redirect from zircoloid. 184.144.160.156 (talk) 08:34, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: -- ke4roh (talk) 19:00, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: redirects

message: Go to: 
http://www.sciencedirect.com  
And run the following querry: 
Zirconium hydrogen fuel rod
1,445 articles found. 
Buffer of references to cite in the main article: 
* Nuclear Fuel Behaviour in Loss-of-coolant Accident (LOCA) Conditions. State-of-the-art Report. OECD 2009, NEA No. 6846.https://www.oecd-nea.org/nsd/reports/2009/nea6846_LOCA.pdf
* Results from the power burst facility severe fuel damage test 1-4; A simulated severe fuel damage accident with irradiated fuel rods and control rods: http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=5105109
* Reflooding experiments with LWR-type fuel rod simulators in the QUENCH facility: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(00)00308-3
* Zirconium oxidation on the atomic scale: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2008.10.020
* Steam oxidation of fuel in defective LWR rods: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(98)00759-4
* Chemical processes in defective LWR fuel rods: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(97)00172-4
Shinkolobwe (talk) 13:46, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References still to fetch and to cite 
Talk:Limes Tripolitanus

message: I have added a lot of data to the article. Hope it is OK now.--OneDalm0 (talk) 04:51, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvement
Template talk:Colors of noise

message: This template probably does more harm than good. It clutters the article and takes up valuable screen space at the head of the article, which should be used for nice informative images.  The "See also" section exits for that purpose, and is placed at the end of the article for that reason.Moreover, the template has only four items. Readers who need to see all the colors of noise can click on any colors of noise link in any of the relevant articles; and there they will find not only a list of names, but also a short description for each "color" and several dubious and informal names as well.Navboxes in general have zero to negative usefulness; they waste people's time, but do not provide any functionality to readers that is not much better served by "See also" and plan wikilinks in the text.All the best, --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 22:12, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This template should be deleted
Talk:Gravity (John Mayer song)

message: Mayer might not know where this song came from, but I do. It's Disney Girls by Bruce Johnston. 71.185.211.250 (talk) 00:25, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin 
Talk:History of surrealism

message: User:Jahsonic#Have_professed_abolute_surrealism --Jahsonic 09:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

message: POV supposing that surrealism is dead, for which there is no evidence stated whatsoever.  The Chicago Surrealist Group is not a "spinoff" of surrealism. --Daniel C. Boyer 15:28, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spinoffs

message: The Centre Pompidou website has a timeline of surrealism page that might make a good external link reference. What say you? >>sparkit|TALK<< 18:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline link
Talk:Warrant officer 2nd class (Royal Canadian Air Cadets)

message: The page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrant_Officer_1st_Class_(WO1)_(Royal_Canadian_Air_Cadets) uses the phrase: "and preferably have completed at least one specialty summer training course", while this article uses the phrase "and have completed at least one specialty summer training course". We should bring the two articles in line with each other. Perhaps this is a sign that all of the air cadet ranks should be grouped together on one page. It does make a logical grouping and they're only a couple of paragraphs each after all. Sancho McCann 09:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specialty summer training course?
Talk:Warrant officer 1st class (Royal Canadian Air Cadets)

message: The page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrant_officer_2nd_class_%28Royal_Canadian_Air_Cadets%29 uses the phrase: "and have completed at least one specialty summer training course", while this article uses the phrase "and preferably have completed at least one specialty summer training course". We should bring the two articles in line with each other. Perhaps this is a sign that all of the air cadet ranks should be grouped together on one page. It does make a logical grouping and they're only a couple of paragraphs each after all. Sancho McCann 09:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specialty summer training course?
Talk:Randall Edwards (actress)

message: After writing an article on  Oregon Secretary of State Randall Edwards, I did a "What links here" and found several, mostly relating to the onetime player on Ryan's Hope.
Applying the "What would people expect" guideline for disambiguation, I moved my article to Randall Edwards (Oregon politician) rather clumsily, made this stub for the television actor by the same name, and put a disambiguation reference at the top of both.
As an Oregonian with an interest in politics, and certifiably an old fart, I would be inclined to make Randall Edwards point to the Secretary of State not the soap opera queen, especially since nobody has seen fit to write an article about her to date.  I would certainly agree if someone decided to reverse the disambiguation scheme on these two articles.  --Jgilhousen 10:05, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I may have done the disambiguation backwards.
Talk:Turtling (gaming)

message: There is already a page describing turtling; it's called Turtle (game term).  I propose this article be either deleted or merged into the Turtle (game term) article.  MysticalGenesis 09:27, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just redirected it. Nothing was really covered in the three sentences here that wasn't already mentioned in Turtle (game term). --Mrwojo 06:15, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Conroy Ryder, 8th Earl of Harrowby

message: I have cleaned up this page a bit. Thanks to the creator of this page, who I urge to complete the process. Wikipedia does not exist to list all the members of a family, unless that person has achieved something worth noting on the encyclopedia; it is not Burke's or Debrett's peerage. Heirs are an exception since they would gain the title in due course.
I have a feeling that my changes to the page will merely be reverted without the contributor adding to the discussion. I urge you not to do so until you have read the Manual of Style, and to ask yourself "am I adding all this information back because I feel it is important for me, or for wikipedia and society in general to know all the exhaustive information about this family?" If you are doing it for yourself and not for others, please set up a web-page to display all the information you would like, and leave it off the encyclopedia. Major Bloodnok 09:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Wrt you edit, there's nothing unwiki about listing the family of any person who themselves merits an article, see a feature article example like Frederick_Hamilton-Temple-Blackwood%2C_1st_Marquess_of_Dufferin_and_Ava which does exactly that with full use of their courtesy titles. Family gets a mention in most articles but for peers it tends to be rather more formal simply because it has complex consequences wrt to succession. I haven't fully restored the previous info as I can't verify the accuracy of it at present. I can't see much point for the stepchildren nor unless they have been legally adopted could they use the styles given. But again that info would need sourcing. When you're editing trying to use a pipe [joe bloggs|Hon joe bloggs] so you don't lose the form while not including it in the article title. Alci12 19:03, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Dudley Ryder, Viscount Sandon]] 

message: Dudley Ryder held the Convenor of Debates at the Newcastle University Union Society in the 1971-72 session. Should we add this?
:Yes.--Counter-revolutionary 18:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Positions Held
Category talk:Wikipedians in Malaysia

message: I have edited some, and created the others, of userboxes for all states. I have also put it up in the Wikipedia:Userboxes/Location/Asia page.
quastar 09:53, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Userboxes 

message: Calling all Malaysian Wikipedians around the world!! It is high time for us to start our own WikiProject for Malaysia..any one can create/assiting me to create WikiProject Malaysia. Marcusaffleck 11:22, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can we have a gathering for all Wikipedians in Malaysia? In KL maybe? Chongkian (talk) 01:47, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Malaysia 

message: How to get visa Markaev Shokhboz (talk) 21:27, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi
Talk:John B. Minor

message: The reference given does state minor married davis' daughter, but http://archives.law.virginia.edu/records/mss/79-8 says it was davis' sister martha (there was no daughter martha), https://books.google.com/books?id=-omPLYeCtsQC&pg=PA179&lpg=PA179&dq=john+b+minor+wife+martha&source=bl&ots=QJgTLLbLd0&sig=MGSESDbl0k1wuV-PqXe9D8jU7Zk&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjBwNmLoZrRAhVFMSYKHcw7BMMQ6AEIHzAB#v=onepage&q=martha%20macon%20davis&f=false also gives the name martha, and the minor family tree  http://www.ourfamtree.org/browse.php?fid=326784 gives her birthday as 1810, only 8 years younger than davis. if there are no objections, i'll switch and note the "daughter" as an alternate. Gzuckier (talk) 20:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  wife?
Talk:DY-500 class

message: The DY-500 class was only ever mentioned in "Up the Long Ladder" so I think it should be deleted and merged there - or added to trivia on that page. Cyberia23 10:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur - a merge seems appropriate. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 11:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Fungi of Australia

message: Wouldn't Fungi of Australia be a better name? It fits in better with the fauna daughter pages (Amphibians of Australia instead of Amphibian fauna of Australia). Also, I don't think it is flora. Unless someone can come up with a reference saying it is, it seems wrong to classify it as such. Especially since our Wiki article on Flora states the complete opposite. Either we change flora or these. --liquidGhoul 10:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, the more I think about it I think you're right. Now, I don't know yet how to change over an article name so all the old edits go with it. If you do, feel free to change to Fungi of Australia.......Cas Liber 10:34, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. To move, just click the move button at the top of the article (make sure you are viewing the article and not the talk page). The prompts will guide you from there. --liquidGhoul 11:50, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool. thanks for that.Cas Liber 13:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: I wanted to remove this paragraph, because its not actually a fungus at all, a common misconception.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.20.101.95 (talk) 07:57, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. Thanks. JKDw (talk) 04:27, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Phytophthora?
Talk:Experience (disambiguation)

message: what about martin amis' autobiography, 'experience'?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.170.190.9 (talk • contribs) 11:20, 4 December 2006
:If there's an article that should be listed here and isn't, add it yourself.  Don't just talk about it, be bold!  leevclarke (talk) 23:28, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just removed the link to Windows XP, which is listed as "the abbreviation of "Windows eXPerience".  Even though this is true, who is going to enter "experience" in the search box expecting to find Windows XP or even a dab link to it?  Nobody calls it Windows Experience.  Of course if anyone objects then they can put it back, but it seems like unnecessary clutter to the dab page to me.  :-p  leevclarke (talk) 23:31, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Windows XP
Talk:Westfield Hornsby

message: What would be really good for this article would be some old photos of the centre from before it was knocked down and rebuilt... anyone got access to centre management?Garrie 10:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Historic photos?
Talk:Submarine 707

message: Discussions welcome. I'm putting in some stub info. I'll have to rewatch the 2 episodes to write the synopsis. Any one else have comments or additional info are welcome. -- Kschang77 19:59, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discuss

message: Hi. You asked for feedback on the anime project talk page, so here I am. As pointed out there, the primary focus on articles about fiction should be out of universe information. The in-unsiverse info should be there only to provide a background to the reader, so he knows what kind of work we're talking about. As an example, you could add in the lead: date of release, time taken for production, director, writer, producer, studio, theme and genre. You could have a section describing the different influences of the authors, and another one for the reception the public and the critics gave it. Your analysis of the tech aspects is good, even if not perfectly worded (if there are so many flaws, it is not as technically perfect as you say; and "sacrilege" is a personal point of view.) However, all these statements should be sourced to a reliable source to be admissible on wikipedia. 
I hope I'm not being too hard. It can seem discouraging in the beginning, but it all adds up easily once you get yourself into it. Please don't hesitate to ask if you have questions or if you need help. My first advice would be to expand the article a bit more, and then start looking for sources. Keep up the good work!!--SidiLemine 17:58, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Out of Universe

message: I've also heard this called "707 Revolution". Is either acceptable? Dictabeard (talk) 05:05, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 707R

message: The entire section reads like someone with too much time on their hands and an axe to grind; Further, it’s a damned cartoon. It’s not like lives actually depend on the “science.” I could put together a perfect valid counter-argument that proves the science in the show correct (sample: “vertical launch torpedoes”, “intermediate designs”). Finally, should the studio that produces this find out about these comments, they’d have very good grounds for action against Wikipedia (I hope they do) and any an all authors on this page (myself included).174.25.16.197 (talk) 18:26, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed as original research. Analysts like this, along with reviews, must be attributed to reliable third-party sources. —Farix (t | c) 13:18, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Reality vs. Anime" Section
Talk:Koffee with Karan

message: I alwayss respect the information thatt I get from  WIKIPEDIA. It would be good if a sequel of the show "Koffee with Karan" would be shown on this website. It would help getting a better picture of the whole thing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.117.102.210 (talk • contribs) 10:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I truely agree with above and would highly recommend to merge both these sequels. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bharatj (talk • contribs) 18:46, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: sequel

message: Of course it is a list, it says who was on the show.  How else can that information be conveyed except by very repetitive prose eg.  In the first week X and Y were on the show, in the second week... Fay06 18:22, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This section is a list
Talk:List of Cortinarius species

message: ..I'd split it into sections but the latest taxonomic research seems to cast doubt on the sections as they currently are. I figure there'd be a major rejig sometime soon....Cas Liber 10:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: : "Apart from a few species such as C. caperatus, many even so-called edible species appear to have very similar species which are at least inedible if not poisonous. or otherwise may differ in edibility geographically."
It is very unclear exactly what the point of this is; is C. caperatus one of the few edible species, or one of few poisonous ones?  That sentence fragment at the end adds nothing either.
I would edit it, but I don't know anything about mushrooms (except P. semilanceata, perhaps...)--Edgewise (talk) 02:30, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean? 

message: Is anybody here who clearly understands what these craps mean? Mazarin07 (talk) 14:30, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edible/toxic icons
Talk:Aaron Gray

message: Please stop inserting Dan & Terry's "white panther" bit into this article, it's a bit on a show and not what WP is for.  I will protect this article if further nonsense is inserted so please, keep the bits to the show and off Wikipedia.  Thanks.
--Wgfinley (talk) 16:34, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boers & Bernstein Fans
Talk:Transversal (combinatorics)

message: What does this mean in human-readable language? Jon Harald Søby 10:46, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I put a  flag up to point out this concern. ~ Booya Bazooka 18:44, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context 

message: System of distinct representatives redirects here... so this article should probably include that term somewhere. ~ Booya Bazooka 18:41, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The book of Lawler contains some information about that, when I have time, I could insert this in the article someday... --Flegmon (talk) 12:22, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  System of distinct representatives
Talk:Meropenem

message: Dear,
apparently there is a mistake in the reported strucutre of meropenem, namely a wrong position of the thiol on the pyrrolidine ring. According to my knowledge it should be 4(not 5)-Mercapto-1-pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid dimethylamide.
http://www.newdruginfo.com/pharmacopeia/usp28/v28230/usp28nf23s0_m49434.htm
http://www.dailydrugnews.com/ess/detail.cfm?Come_From=Notices&N_ID=34815&Structure=Yes&From=Full%20database&ToDate=Today&DrugName=meropenem&Manufac=&Section=&ThGroup=&Contents=&TypeComp=&TypeInfo=&Group=Sec
Best regards,
Claudio
:Yes, you're right. Now  Fixed—thank you for noticing! Fvasconcellos (t·c) 13:26, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

message: I think that should be pyrrolidin-3-yl rather than -2-yl.
   69.72.27.223 (talk) 03:50, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Systematic name 

message: there is a mistake in API structure, Meropenem has N,N-dimethylamide function not an isopropylamide.
KR
Jerome 24.206.109.36 (talk) 06:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  structure
Talk:Ys II: Ancient Ys Vanished – The Final Chapter

message: I added some info about the DS version. I used GameFAQs release data as a source. I don't know if gf is generally considered acceptable for a source on wiki, because a lot of their data is user submitted, but if not, hopefully someone can find another source to replace them with rather than just remove the info. I only used gf because I'm familiar with the site, and I'm sure the info I used from them was correct (the full title of the US version, the US version being on one card along with Book I, the Japanese version being a single game, the US publisher, and the years of the two releases). I just didn't know which other sites, if any, might be preferable for this sort of information and didn't want to leave out a source entirely when adding so many facts. 76.226.215.43 (talk) 04:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  DS version info from GameFAQs
Talk:Ys III: Wanderers from Ys

message: This is a ridiculous term, a) Because Steam is a store and not a platform, the platform is Windows PC and b) it's not like it's even exclusive to Steam. The same version can also be bought from GOG.com. 86.26.232.213 (talk) 23:57, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Steam remake"?
Talk:Ys: The Oath in Felghana

message: I swear I've heard of that, even seen pics for it. I think it was made for Windows? I remember it got bad reviews because it actually didn't scroll at all, but just relied on hand-drawn stills. Tcaudilllg (talk) 10:48, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's for the PS2, and it was released by Taito and not Falcom itself (this may have something to do with the bad reviews you're remembering; I've seen this happen with other third-party ports and remakes of Falcom games). And unlike this version, it wasn't officially released in English (the PSP version of The Oath in Felghana, which was the one that got localized into English, was ported from the PC version by Falcom itself, as opposed to how Konami did the PS2 and PSP ports of The Ark of Napishtim and various companies did the console versions of the side-scrolling Ys III: Wanderers from Ys). --Evice (talk) 18:55, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Side-scroller remake 
Talk:The Teachers of Gurdjieff

message: There is no proof anywhere that J.G. Bennett has written this book. Bennett even mentions in his book "Witness", that this book was most likely written by Idris Shah. He was wrong, it was written by Omar Shah (some of his pupils told me so).
:: Bennett doesn't say that in "Witness".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.176.189 (talk) 23:22, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd never seen an attribution to Bennett either. Thanks for the additional info re OAS' authorship. Jayen466 19:10, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

text: I think OAS's books are mostly transcriptions of his talks and thus not really an indication of his writing skills – given that he collaborated with Graves on the Omar Khayyam, one would think he had some sort of ability with the written word. And translations of TTOG are/were mostly published through his set-up, rather than Octagon. I've read people assert in the strongest terms that OAS wrote it, but what do I (they) know. At any rate, it is irrelevant to this article, as we are required to rely on published sources. Jayen466 00:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bennett

message: If you type in Rafael Lefort in Ancestry.com dozens of entries appear in Quebec (with a ph spelling) and I imagine if the same search was done in France where RL is supposed to have come from, many more will surface. It is not an improbable name as James Moore has suggested. Moore was just too  angry and obsessed to make an objective search.--Wool Bridge (talk) 22:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It would still to seem to have been a pseudonymous book. Writing pseudonymous works was a Shah family tradition; Sirdar Ikbal Ali Shah did it according to Augy Hayter, even organising writer workshops who would output children's books and romance novels to make ends meet, Idries Shah wrote pseudonymous potboilers, his pupil Edward Campbell donned the pseudonym of an "Ernest Scott" to write a book much influenced and published by Shah ... and btw, Omar Ali Shah produced a translation of the Rose Garden. There need not have been any Rafael Lefort, Arkon Daraul, HBM Dervish etc. Jayen466 23:13, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rafael Lefort
Talk:Four Sephardic Synagogues

message: I think this should be renamed into Rabban Yochanan ben Zakai Synagogue so as to avoid confusion with Yochanan ben Zakai. ←Humus sapiens ну? 11:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename