Talk:Namdev

message: Namdev said in his writing that he is not Hindu, The tag of Hindu philosophy should not be put under his article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.110.241.228 (talk) 08:12, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Namdev was not Hindu

message: I removed some content here because it looked like a copyright violation. I've now got the article that was referred to and it is clear that there was no violation. However, the contributor has significantly misrepresented the source, eg: saying that Namdev spent three days in Bassi Pathander when the source says "According to many Punjabis, Namdev spent three days in Bassi Pathana" - the "according to" is very significant when dealing with controversial topics and, indeed, the entire premise of the source is that this topic is controversial. I'll put the source away for a bit, then re-read it and try to incorporate the information in a more neutral manner. - Sitush (talk) 16:04, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misrepresentation 

message: As Sant Namdev contributed to the Bhakti Movement and most of his ABHANGA's or petry anded to the holy GURUGRANTHSAHIB , he is the only person who has written down the autobiography of Sant Dnyaneshwar and his sibblings and because of this contribution we get to know the life of these Saints....
This litrature contains in NAMDEV GATHA.. where there are chapters like SAMADHI PRAKARAN, TIRTHAWALI...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swapniladitya (talk • contribs) 13:00, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sant Namdev the first Reporter and Writer in the Varkari Cult 

message: @Sitush wrote:
::"To Namdev, mechanical rituals are futile, pilgrimage to holy places is pointless, deep meditation and loving mutual devotion is what matters" looks like it might be a close paraphrase, if not an outright copyright violation, of the cited source. Please can someone check. - Sitush (talk) 04:56, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: copyvio check

message: @Sitush mentions the essay on WP:QUOTEFARM, and its applicability to this article. Extracting...
::The guideline in that essay: "Quotations are a good tool to comply with the no original research policy but must be used with care. Quotations must be verifiably attributed to a reliable source. Attribution should be provided in the text of the article, not exclusively in a footnote or citation. While quotations are an indispensable part of Wikipedia, try not to overuse them. Overuse happens when a quotation is visually on the page, but its relevance is not explained anywhere. Quotes are used to explain a point that can also be paraphrased. - from WP:QUOTEFARM
I believe "attributing with reliable source, explaining relevance, and paraphrase" is what I have done in this article, to the best of my ability. I am trying my best to satisfy WP:Copyvio, WP:Plag and WP:Quotefarm, as well as not change the meaning or do WP:OR while re-summarizing in one's own words. If a specific paragraph can be improved to better meet WP:Quotefarm concerns, please identify which, and suggest ways to improve it. Your help is most welcome. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 16:17, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: quotefarm concern

message: Sarah, no one is ignoring your contribution, at least you are looking for these articles, otherwise these articles were in bad shape since ages. I just have concern that you should not ignore some text in source. It is obvious that everyone do have his/her POV, I can't claim that I'm very neutral editor neither you. We just have to improve ourself as Wikipedia editor and try to be "more neutral" if not "complete neutral". I'm not discouraging you. I want you to improve Varakari related articles because you have special interest in it. Me too have interest in it, but currently I'm working on Tourism related Projects. I'm also planning to make template on Varkari topics because as per my knowledge there is no such template, we can include all Varkari related articles in one template which will help us to improve those topics. Best regards. --Human3015Send WikiLove  15:05, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: @Human3015: I have read your lecture, and feel you have good intentions. You write, "I just have concern that you should not ignore some text in source." Have I done so in this article? Please identify the page number(s), source and the ignored text that you have in mind for this article? Casting aspersions without "specifics and revision diffs" falls under WP:AVOIDYOU, and ill-considered accusations of impropriety without evidence is WP:IUC. So, give me specifics for this article, and let us collaborate to help improve this article. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 16:17, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: POV and @Human3015

message: @Sitush: I noticed your edit summaries referring to these. That makes sense. I just hope, in cases where you removed the cite because the same cite is at the end of the para, people don't tag sentences with 'cite needed' and delete the tagged sentence in future. Particularly, after someone inserts sentences inside that paragraph from a different reliable source. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 17:19, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wp:Overcite and Wp:Citevar 

message: संत नामदेव ग्रंथ 2409:4042:D19:5FD0:A0B:3C9D:6683:EB5F (talk) 07:04, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: नामदेव एक महान संत थे वे भगवान बिठ्ठल अन्यन्नभक्त थे ये और वे हिन्दूसमाज से हैं और अपनी भी अस्तित्वरखते  हैं, ये नामदेव क्षत्रिय है और क्षत्रिय समाज में अपना अस्तित्व रखते हैं  इन्हे दर्जी भी कहा जाता है इनकी वंसावली की तथ्य यहां से मिलता है की जब भगवान परशुराम 21बार क्षत्रियों का वध किया और  21 बार इन्हे धरती से विहीन किया था [Special:Contributions/24094043:78A:7B33:0:0:EF:58A1|2409:4043:78A:7B33:0:0:EF:58A1]] (talk) 02:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  संत नामदेव 

message: Here is mentioned that Namdev(darji) are sudhra but I'm showing dissatisfaction because sudhra are those who are untouchable, namdev are not untouchable. This is my kindly request to you that remove the title of sudhra from the darji caste written in your page. 103.81.152.195 (talk) 05:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caste issue 

message: Qq 183.87.125.199 (talk) 09:22, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death reason