Talk:Mulan II

message: EDIT: There, I did it for you. Sylfi (talk) 07:23, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ANOTHER Mulan Sequel 

message: :Image:Mulan2DVD.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Mulan2DVD.jpg

message: the first movie is under "Mulan (1998 film)" so the links should be updated.
:* Would you be more specific about what you want changed? -- Matthew Glennon (T/C\D) 13:11, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *There are no links left to Mulan, they are all to Mulan (1998 film). ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:29, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mulan now redirects to Hua Mulan 

message: I am sure this is a mistake. This movie was made in the USA and released there on 2/01/05. It couldn't be released in Italy or Norway before. Perhaps they mean 2005 (I am sure they do), but anyway from I know the release dates in other countries go on imdb but not here. So someone with an account fix this? Speaking of which, could we just try to put this on pending changes instead of semiprotection? It's been over a year and a half and almost never gets vandalized. 64.134.31.78 (talk) 01:45, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: This Movie article lacks any reference and information to the reception and movie critics, like most movie articles.
Update would be appreciated :-)
Additionally, there are no budget nor box-office sales information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.146.79.62 (talk) 06:19, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for replying 7 years later. I see that between this very long period of time, there are still no reliable sources, reception, and box office information added to this article. I have added this to my watchlist and will try my best to add those information.Thissecretperson (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 14:59, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie Reception 

message: Okay, so it's happy that everyone married who they wanted to, but what about the Mongol threat? Would China be doomed to fall to the Mongols, or did the alliance happen anyway? Because there would be no reason for an alliance unless there was marriage. Nikofeelan (talk) 00:53, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for commenting 6 years later. As far as I know there is no movie footage of what would happen to China after everyone got married. So, unfortuntely, no, the alliance may not have happened, but the movie did not explain what could possibly happen to China afterwards.Thissecretperson (talk) 20:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did the alliance happen?