lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Firefly Arts Collective

message: The title of this page is actually the name of the organizing non-profit group, while the event is just called "Firefly".  I suggest this article be renamed Firefly (event) - any objections? -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 18:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've actually had the same thought.  There had once been a red link to Firefly (Event). ForestJay 01:23, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I had put that on List of regional Burning Man events at one point.  Not sure. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 04:08, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move? 

message: This was posted to a related group today:
"2003 (165 tickets)  
2004 was Friday, June 17th through Monday, June 20th. (240 tickets, 4 days)  
2005 was Friday the 1st through Monday the 4th. ($25, 400 tickets, 4 days, first year sold out)
2006 was Friday the 30th though Monday the 3rd. ($30, 480 tickets, 4 days)
2007 was Thursday the 5th through Sunday the 8th. ($35, 400 tickets, 4 days)
2008 was Thursday the 3rd through Sunday the 6th. ($40, 500 tickets, 4 days, single-year site with pond)
2009 was Thursday the 2nd through Sunday the 5th. ($40, 450 tickets, 4 days, first year at current site)
2010 was Thursday the 1st through Monday the 5th. ($45, 600 tickets, 5 days)
2011 was Thursday the 30th through Monday the 4th. ($50, 600 tickets, 5 days)
2012 was Wednesday the 4th through Sunday the 8th. ($75, 789 tickets, 5 days, first year of ticket lottery+waitlist returns)
2013 was Wednesday the 3rd through Sunday the 7th. ($75, 849 tickets, 5 days)
2014 was Tuesday the 1st through Sunday the 6th. ($85, $20 parking, 850 tickets, 6 days, new ticketing software, ARTifacts, buses)
2015 was Tuesday the 30th through Sunday the 5th. ($80, $30 parking, 950 tickets, 6 days)
2016 was Wednesday the 29th through Monday the 4th. ($80, $30 parking, 1050 tickets, 6 days, ARTifacts are now Intentions)"
—Darxus (talk) 20:48, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Veteran Reserve Corps

message: Article is missing some information the veteran reserve corps is still in existence as a uniformed service of the United States and still falls under the jurisdiction of the DoD the US Army and now FEMA as well 2603:7080:3602:8FCC:4CA3:3561:30C4:493B (talk) 00:30, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The Veteran Reserve Corps as it exists today is not an official uniformed service of the United States and certainly does not fall under DoD, Army, or FEMA jurisdiction. This current organization is a 501c3 nonprofit that uses the name and claims the lineage of a unit of the United States Army that hasn’t existed since the 19th century. It is for that reason as well as the lack of sources for the claims made in the article that I have deleted any mentions of this current nonprofit. EricMSE (talk) 09:18, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  US VRC
Template talk:Lola

message: What's the consensus for the inclusion of the following cars in this template?:
*THL1, THL2 - called "Lolas" but neither designed nor built by Lola (although Eric Broadley is credited as Chief Engineer for the THL1)
*Honda RA300 - designed by Broadley (based on a Lola Indycar) but not called a "Lola" (although it was colloquially referred to at the time as the "Hondola")
*Honda RA301 - neither designed/built by Lola nor called a "Lola" - it seems to have earned inclusion on the basis of being "an update of the RA300".
I'd recommend retaining THL1 and THL2 and deleting the Hondas, but I'm not passionate either way. P.S. Feel freee to correct any inaccuracies in the above statements - I'm just going by what it says in the articles. DH85868993 (talk) 23:12, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say keep them all, as the articles cover the degree of Lola influence.--Midgrid(talk) 23:38, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree on keeping them all.  Even if the Haas Lolas weren't built by Lola, they're still associated with them (and really, their constructors points still went to Lola). The359 (Talk) 04:02, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

text: I'd recommend the removal of the THL1 & THL2. Including them perpetuates the myth that they were actually built be Lola. Similarly the Honda RA301. So it's an update of the Honda RA300. The Zytek 04S was an update of the Reynard 02S. Does that make the 04S, or the Creation CA06/H, a Reynard? Is the Caterham Seven a Lotus? --Falcadore (talk) 09:25, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusions
Talk:Julie Penner

message: I'm not sure how prominent a musician has to be to be considered notable, but this article was created partly because there is a broken link from Broken Social Scene.  Most of the other musicians in that group already have pages on Wikipedia.  Perhaps they are more notable?  I'm not sure.
She has played on at least five different albums, and is currently (as mentioned in the article) the music producer for a high-profile radio show, The Vinyl Cafe.  --PurpleRainTalk to me 20:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Acceptable.  This may be nominated at articles for deletion in future, however.  Chick Bowen 01:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Argument against speedy deletion

message: This article needs a better picture of Ms. Penner, that doesn't show her in silhouette...........PKT(alk) 18:37, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo requested
Talk:Massey Medal

message: Nominee: This article is currently an FCGA Award nominee. To vote on this article, see the Awards page. Clerks 19:06, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Featured Canadian Geography Achievement

message: The Royal Architectural Institute of Canada awarded a "Massey Medal" for design 8 times between 1950–1970.  This lapsed for a decade, until it was reborn as the Governor General's Medal in Architecture in 1982.  If someone feels ambitious, they could dig up some relevant history and untangle the two.  See Shore Tilbe Irwin + Partners for an example of the other use.  76.67.17.208 (talk) 02:56, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have redirected the articles such as Upper Canada College, Ottawa Train Station, and Shore Tilbe Irwin + Partners to Governor General's Award as they pertain to the architecture award. There is a discussion on that page to separate out the different Governor General's Award, so these same articles will likely need to be redirected again. Clerks. (talk) 19:02, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguity: Some links to this article refer to the architecture award
Talk:Interdenominational Theological Center

message: copyvio? --(Crnk Mnky)69.87.173.188 21:58, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick google search and check of the references doesn't show anything. Sagsaw 20:36, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I would like to enroll in Phillips School of Theology online. 2601:447:C080:9B60:BC5D:820E:4969:7D54 (talk) 19:02, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enrollment and tuition
Talk:Kransekage

message: Could someone add something about how the cake is served?  I am very curious. {unsigned|69.210.96.177|18:51, November 23, 2006}}
:It's served like a normal cake, I believe, except with a bigger, badder, pointier knife because the rings are more dense. No special treatment. Ourai т с 02:02, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Knives aren't normally used serving the Danish version of the cake. You begin at the top and break rings off the finished cake, one or a few at the time, which is very easy since the rings are "glued" together using chocolate. Each person takes either a whole (smaller) ring or around a quarter or half of a bigger ring. It is eaten using fingers only, and on New Year's Eve, many people literally approach the strike of 12 with a glass of champagne in one hand and a piece of kransekage in the other. Valentinian T / C 19:43, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above. This cake is broken up from the top downwards and eaten with fingers like a snack. --Joffeloff (talk) 23:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In the video is mentioned, that one is counting with 50 gr Kransekage per person.--93.104.13.204 (talk) 03:47, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Serving

message: Near the end of the novel when she had her birthday party, it mentioned about an almond paste ring stack. Is it the same thing?  cecikierk
 
Yup. Maybe almond paste is a better description than marzipan- it is much more "coarse" than the latter.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:C440:20:E68:1157:8BDE:DC49:CD9F (talk) 01:42, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mentioned in "Sophie's World"? 

message: I do not understand, why this should be a stub. The only thing, which ist missing, are Kransekagestænger, small fingers of Kransekage, which are cookies. They can be bought in Skandinavia. I added the video. And I am thinking, that the second photo is useless. --93.104.13.204 (talk) 03:34, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe a preparation and recipe could be in order? 82.209.19.98 (talk) 11:38, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub? 

message: Someone deleted the reference to Denmark. I undid the delete, but now now my undo is being undone. look at the sources/references, this is both danish and norwegian not one or the other.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:2012:312:B400:6DD4:76C7:7CDE:9374 (talk) 16:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to undo vandalism but Serols insist that the the same thing can not have different names in different countries and therefor it can not be from both. Why should their be a wikipedia entry for both kransekake and kransekage when it is the same thing originating from the same region and used the same way?2001:2012:312:B400:6DD4:76C7:7CDE:9374 (talk) 17:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  This you can mention under a new section, but you do not change up the article name --Serols (talk) 08:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not only norwegian
Talk:Argument map

message: I just read a relatively recently published chapter on argument mapping:  The ebook can be downloaded freely.
In my judgment, parts of this chapter rely heavily on (one could even say "borrow from") this Wikipedia article but without citing the Wikipedia article, which is perhaps a bit disingenuous from a scholarly perspective. If the authors consulted this Wikipedia article, then they should have cited it.
The "A brief history of argument mapping" section of the chapter closely follows . There is essentially nothing in this section of the chapter that is not in the corresponding section of this Wikipedia article.
But the real eye-opener for me was a sentence in the chapter's section on "Argument mapping software": "These range from single-user software such as Rationale, Convince Me and Athena; to small group software such as Digalo, QuestMap, Compendium, Belvedere, and AcademicTalk; to collaborative online debating tools for argumentation such as Debategraph and Collaboratorium." (In this quotation I removed a trademark symbol after "Rationale"; Tim van Gelder, a creator of the Rationale software, was a coauthor of the chapter, and he likely made sure that the trademark symbol was included! Wikipedia doesn't use trademark symbols, per MOS:TM.) Compare that sentence quoted from the chapter to the following sentence in this Wikipedia article: "Single-user argumentation systems include Convince Me, iLogos, LARGO, Athena, Araucaria, and Carneades; small group argumentation systems include Digalo, QuestMap, Compendium, Belvedere, and AcademicTalk; community argumentation systems include Debategraph and Collaboratorium." , so I was well-prepared to recognize it (thinly disguised) in someone else's writing. But worst of all here is the fact that all of the information in that sentence comes from the source cited in the Wikipedia article: Scheuer et al. (2010). The sentence is a summary of three paragraphs in Scheuer et al. (2010), and the organization scheme used in the sentence comes directly from organization scheme in the source. But the authors of the chapter never cite Scheuer et al.!!! It appears that they essentially copied the sentence directly from Wikipedia without citing either Wikipedia or the original source of the information!
To me this appears to be another example of academics essentially copying from Wikipedia but not acknowledging the source. Talk about "studies in critical thinking"—this is a good one! Biogeographist (talk) 03:27, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did Davies, Barnett, & van Gelder (2019) copy from Wikipedia without acknowledgment?
Talk:Mynytho

message: Neighbouring villages: Part of Mynytho is called Coed-y-fron. Foel-Gron school - now closed I believe - it would be nice if some historical info could be provided. 
Chapels: one in Coed-y-fron, now disused. The other, Horeb, more details perhaps. 
Does anybody feel inspired enough to write up any of these aspects? Augusta2 (talk) 17:38, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Truckee Tahoe Airport

message: This article: http://www.nnbw.com/news/2005/dec/28/crew-killed-in-truckee-jet-crash-identified/ states that there were two other accidents that took place at the airport. They are not listed on this page. ~~ 2600:4041:407:1500:D46F:6C2C:E941:A62 (talk) 21:12, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past accidents
Talk:Information quality management

message: "Information Quality Management"  has 29,500 googles.  I addded an external link to one site that looks relevant. RJFJR 16:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability 

message: Oh, hi. I'm not in the cleanup task force and just picked this article at random, I wikified it a bit an removed the cleanup tag. It still needs sources though. Herostratus 07:07, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup
Talk:Francesco Landini

message: Was he famus  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.192.183.69 (talk • contribs) .
:Yes, he was.  He was the most famous composer of the 14th century in Italy.  He also partied hard (see Andrea da Firenze).  Antandrus  (talk) 22:56, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I made some changes to the article based on my understanding of the most recent scholarship in English and Italian.  I was a bit lazy and didn't justify all the changes (except in the change log), but I think there's nothing too controversial that you can see in a perusal of recent literature.  But feel free to revert if someone demands citations for everything that conflicts with what else is on the web.
My general inclination would also be to change most of the references from Landini to Francesco: more and more of the most careful scholarship has been moving in that direction (not that this was necessarily influential, but see  for some arguments for that.)  There are some general music history books coming out in the near future which use Francesco throughout to refer to the composer, but as they're not out yet, they can't be used as evidence for WP, so I'll leave it for now.  But won't revert if some other forward-thinking editor chooses to do so.  -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 02:24, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: being lazy, sorry

message: Hi LuceStella -- you added a ref. to Landini being close to Petrarch based on the "Dolce Nova" book -- can you add what evidence that book uses?  I can't find that book anywhere, ILL reports not a single copy in the US: given that it's an unusual statement, I'd appreciate further evidence.  Thanks!  -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 13:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Landini and Petrarch 

message: Just wanted to note that scholarly consensus is changing and more and more scholars are using "Francesco degli Organi" (or w/ lowercase "o") to refer to the composer.  The last four dissertations and articles I read all used that name.  I'm not sure that a few years of scholars adopting the new name is enough to override decades of usage yet (and for disclosure/COI, it was my 2006 dissertation that made the main argument for dropping the name "Landini") but I wanted to write this in case a proposal appears in the next couple of years. -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 21:13, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting—was not aware myself. I would agree that the change may be too incremental at the moment to warrant a move (yet). If only there was more scholarship on Landini... particularly compared to the endless attention Machaut receives... Aza24 (talk) 22:14, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming changes
Talk:Dog licence

message: It would be good to have two or three scans of dog licences to provide representative examples from different periods and jurisdictions. I've added a link to the only scans I could find on the web of a British dog licence, because I was curious to know what they looked like, as I think other readers might be. David 18:19, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:The Secret of Santa Vittoria

message: Did anything like the film's plot actually happen or was it just Hollywood? Did the German government seize wine bottles? The MSM promotes the notion that the Germans were plunderers however Germany was the most plundered country ever after WW1 and again after WW2 - the Soviets alone took 450,000 railway freight cars after WW2.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.144.97.114 (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Veracity
Talk:Canford Heath

message: I'm afraid Canford heath is not the largest heath in Dorset, let alone the UK! This is misleading and should be ammended.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.250.169.17 (talk) 16:22, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm drafting some improvements at Draft:Canford Heath, with intent to merge it with this article when done. Any help would be appreciated. I'm going to look at old newspapers at some point. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:32, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving 
Wikipedia talk:Bulgarian Collaboration Project

message: Hello!
The translation project has been entirely revamped and is now here. Since there aren't many requests for translations from Bulgarian, we are thinking of merging this page with the main project page so as to make the requests much more likely to be seen.
Please leave a message here or on Wikipedia:Translation's talkpage if you feel that translations from Bulgarian should have their own subpage in the project.
Marialadouce | parlami 19:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to [[Wikipedia:Translation]]
Talk:1968 Formula One season

message: It is stated that Bruce McLaren became the second man to win on a car of his own make. I think it should be changed to third, because the 1967 Belgian Grand Prix was won by Dan Gurney on his own (Anglo-American Racers) Eagle Weslake T1G. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 158.227.49.5 (talk) 13:28, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bruce McLaren
Talk:Ethylenediamine

message: Don't know how to work in all the facts:
http://www.sugarlandtx.gov/sugarland/instantalert/alert.asp
ated at 3:30 pm, Jan. 8, 2007 
Following a chemical release at the Nalco facility earlier this afternoon, it is now safe to go outside. The shelter in place has been lifted. 
Summary
The Sugar Land Fire Department responded to a chemical release at 1:45 p.m. today at the Nalco facility on U.S. 90A near Highway 6. 
The chemical release of ethylenediamine came from an 18-wheel tanker truck. 
A reverse 911 was sent out asking residents to shelter in place. 
Both the Sugar Land and Nalco haz-mat teams contained the leak. 
The shelter in place has been lifted, and it is now safe to go outside. 
Sugar Land is in the process of reopening roadways.
 
151.213.189.159 21:38, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: sugar land incident

message: Am I correct in thinking that Ethylenediamine is the same substance as N-(1-naftyl)-ethyleendiaminehydrochloride?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.103.250.85 (talk) 08:05, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Same substance?

message: Is it a synonym, or...? 86.130.41.222 (talk) 13:53, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "ethanediamine" redirect here? 
Talk:Salem Ahmed Hadi

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 22:49, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Another useful source is the The Guantanamo Docket. It is an interactive database provided and updated by the New York Times. The database is searchable and has the Pentagon documents (CSRT and ARB) included. Additional documents and reliable New York Times research regarding the detainees at Guantanamo are also provided. This is the link to the documents and research regarding Salem Ahmed Hadi. IQinn (talk) 09:09, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rough work 

message: I removed the "Identity" section with the "Captive  131...", there i no good reason or need for such a section in this article and it was dehumanizing and based on WP:OR by WP:SYN. IQinn (talk) 13:15, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identity 
Talk:Mark Morford

message: Is not the word "iconoclastic" a little too harsh for an article that isn't supposed to be biased? This is supposed to be an article written in a formal, OBJECTIVE tone, and instead, there are negative phrases all over the place. Maybe the writers need to look up "objective", "formal tone" and "iconoclastic" before continuing the article. Look them up quickly, here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Absurdliaisons (talk • contribs).
:Why not ask Morford? I'm pretty sure he'd agree that he's an iconoclast. In fact, he'd probably be complemented.
:Atlant 17:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the great tips!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.229.180.115 (talk) 00:29, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iconoclast 

message: One aspect not covered in this wiki entry is the fact that Mark Morford is a huge fucking douchebag.  Should this be a new "Douchebag" section, or can it just go into the existing body text?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.60.236 (talk) 19:08, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Douchebag 

message: This article is a little too heavy on descriptions of what his writing is like, with not enough basic information (early life? birthdate and birthplace?) about the man himself. Moncrief (talk) 13:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Where did he grow up?

message: Please stop adding the descriptor "Marxist" to this person's article. Marxists are conscientious social critics and historians. They do not believe, as Morford does (for example) that there are energy vampires whose "cords" reach through facebook to drain the life from you. 70.143.67.217 (talk) 16:02, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Marxist
Talk:Q cycle

message: This page is almost exactly the same as the one referenced below. Perhaps this one should be merged into it?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coenzyme_Q_-_cytochrome_c_reductase  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceemann4231 (talk • contribs) 21:55, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with Coenzyme Q - cytochrome C reductase? 

message: The Q cycle is described in the article on the Cytochrome b6f complex about midway down. Should there be a disambiguation note? 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytochrome_b6f_complex Daniel.westcott (talk) 17:08, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is not clearly distinguished from the Q-cycle in photosynthesis. 
Talk:Fizzball

message: OK, OK, OK. I had this article NOT as a stub, but then someone went and shortened it to TWO SENTENCES! Now it's a stub and very uninformative. At least my article gave information on the game. I was on a vacation and planning on making it POV neutral when I got back, but noooooooooooo... You guys went and changed it before I had a chance. I'm lodging a complaint. Excuse my temper, but it's kind of unfair. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shoveldude (talk • contribs) 22:01, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Large article change

message: A Google search for FizzBall game does turn up a good number of hits, including  and  though I'm not sure these really meet the requirements to really establish notability. I'm rather indifferent as to whether the article should be kept, but if it is it needs a rewrite. -- Hawaiian717 18:36, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 