Talk:Peter Oakley

message: I have edited out Peter's surname and city from the article as per the request he made through his website (http://www.askgeriatric.com/), and also intend to nominate this article for deletion, although I'll make sure that's okay with him first. 
While I do appreciate that he is, arguably, a 'notable' enough person for inclusion in the Wikipedia, this page, by disclosing personal information, serves as a personal security risk. Have some respect (if not for him as a person then at least the law), and don't put it back. --Unreadablecharacters 17:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of surname and city

message: "...he served as a radar mechanic during World War II"
No, he served AFTER the war.  1945-1927 = 18.  Highly unlikely. Brainhell 03:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And he says quite clearly in one of his videos that he is 79. My guess is the profile is out of date. Perhaps we should just include the discrepancy in the article at this point? --Siradia 18:40, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I reckon the profile is out of date. I figure it is best to state his age as 79 for the moment because he stated he was 79 quite clearly in one video. --Haplo7 19:37, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Im brand new to actualy adding content to Wikipedia, I have used it for a while but want to give back... tell me if there is some etiquite I should know about and if im doing something wrong... Id like to help build this up and coming page considering i know it wont get deleated. Skeeve KAM 05:26, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: factual error

message: What about some like this as a subarticle?  --24.91.83.121 04:12, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Telling it all subpage 

message: :::"The word "source", as used in Wikipedia, has three related meanings. It can refer to 1) the piece of work that is being cited, 2) the creator of the work (the author or artist), and 3) the publisher or location where it is to be found (a website, book, album or painting). All three can affect the reliability of the work. Portions of this page use "source" exclusively in the first sense for the sake of clarity, but that does not limit the scope of this guideline.
:::A reliable source is a published work regarded as trustworthy or authoritative in relation to the subject at hand. Evaluation of reliability will depend on the credibility of the author and the publication, along with consideration of the context. Reliable publications are those with an established structure for fact-checking and editorial oversight. A world-renowned mathematician may not be a reliable source about biology. Authors may be reliable outside their primary field if recognized as having expertise in a secondary area of study. In general, an article should use the most reliable and appropriate published sources to cover all majority and significant-minority published views, in line with Wikipedia:Neutral point of view."
Argent009 16:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6178644.stm - ∅ (∅), 16:05, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: For Your Information (Re: Sources of information) from Wikipedia itself

message: As of August 4 of 2010, Geriatric1927's account has been suspended and his videos removed due to terms of use violations.
This sucks monkey balls, if you ask me.--200.95.132.17 (talk) 23:20, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  His account has been suspended 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:31, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Peter Oakley.svg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: How can he make his debut in August 2006, yet "by mid 2006" he was the most subscribed to person on youtube? Mid 2006 would be end of june beginning of july which is before his debut.--125.129.16.99 (talk) 09:36, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency