lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of states and union territories of India by population

message: The population counts on this page disagree with the population counts on some of the linked state pages.  This should be fixed and we should footnote the census year that was chosen.   --Meara 11:53, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Population stats per State/UT in this table have been normalised & corrected to reflect the published final figures for the 2001 Census of India.--cjllw | TALK 04:11, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

text: I've corrected a couple of misplaced commas (Rural Pop.), several percentages and reranked 22 and 23 so 22 has more people than 23. Glenn L (talk) 21:39, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

text: The Urban and rural population for the state Andhra Pradesh seem to be not right  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashwin.reddy (talk • contribs) 11:10, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population count 

message: Pondy et al are UTs and not states and will confuse someone new to Indian geography. I suggest that UTs be given a separate article or a new table atleast to avoid confusion. For eg. in the article Pondicherry, it is listed as the second largest by population, but here it shows the rankings of only the states and the UTs are given a mere "-". Pl look into this someone. --Idleguy 14:20, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Union Territories to be split from the states 

message: It should be 899:1000 instead 100:1000.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.193.159.33 (talk) 04:13, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sex ratio of Uttar Pradesh misprinted 

message: We are working towards raising awareness on inequality among Indian states. We feel that this will eventually lead to elections focused on development issues. At present we provide comparison of states on number of topics mainly through map and single point of data. We want to add our page on population of states, http://statemaps.org/india/state_population/ as useful link on article page. Please suggest what is Wikipedia policy regarding this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hobbescalvin (talk • contribs) 17:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query about Wikipedia policy on adding useful links 

message: According to p 20 of this census handbook, Punjab was 15th. Our article says 16th. Is this handbook wrong? - Sitush (talk) 03:08, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana was split up in this article which pushes all states below 12th down by 1 rank. I don't know how the resulting population was calculated, maybe somebody went to the trouble of finding the district-wise populations and added them up to get Telangana's population. —Gazoth (talk) 13:09, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punjab - 15th or 16th? 

message: It seems most peculiar that the percentage of people in the largest state is not indicated in the table.  Probably an oversight but the value could even be calculated if it is not in the source data.
 
Idyllic press (talk) 09:31, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table with percentages is missing proportion for Uttar Pradesh
Talk:Morgoth

message: The Silmarillion in Tolkien's work is an ancient epic that has been published in part in several books, one of which is called The Silmarillion.  I edited the intro to make this distinction.  Zaslav (talk) 21:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean Tolkien's legendarium. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silmarillion
Talk:Marmoset

message: "They lack wisdom teeth." This sounds funny, as marmosets are platyrrhines, and platyrrhines have a dental formula of 2.1.3.3 or 2.1.3.2. Is any animal other than a catarrhine said to have wisdom teeth? -phma 15:14, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Wisdom teeth in humans are the third set of molars. However, it is not the dental pattern that gives them their name, but the fact that they arrive later in life than the other adult molars. (See the article for more details.) If this late arrival of the (final) set of molars occurs in other species, it would be that set that is deemed to be wisdom teeth. If all the adult teeth arrive at about the same time, then the species does not have wisdom teeth. - UtherSRG 01:53, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Wisdom teeth

message: I've added a contradict tag.... This article states that marmosets exhibit monogamy, while the polyandry article says they exhibit polyandry. - UtherSRG (talk) 04:36, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps this site would help clear up the issue (see the section on Reproductive Biology). 68.42.113.38 01:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah... or maybe ... 138.38.106.191 (talk) 11:29, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[polyandry]]

message: Why is there no picture of a marmoset? Come on!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.3.37.232 (talk) 04:40, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: "Their body temperature is unusually variable"
Is this compared with other mammals?
2A00:23C4:F391:5701:5B5:FF5E:D722:E2F4 (talk) 15:12, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  temperature
Talk:Steroid

message: Who can add information about ent-steroids? See https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2668732/
Simon de Danser (talk) 21:35, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomenclature

message: Is there a reason for using the molecular structure of a hypothetical steroid right at the beginning of this article? If there is, it is not evident to me. Clicking the link "24-ethyl-lanostane" takes the reader to an article about lanostane, and this article has no mention of a 24-ethylated version. It seems that 24-ethyl-lanostane is both hypothetical and insignificant, and as such, I propose that this image be replaced by one of the molecular structure of a non-hypothetical steroid. As a layperson I would propose cholesterol, but I'm sure a chemist could come up with a steroid that serves a better illustrative purpose. Anditres (talk) 00:25, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The whole point of the figure is the numbering system, not the particular steroid. Cholesterol would not work because it does not contain all the potential carbon atoms that a steroid might possess. To reduce confusion, I moved 24-ethyl outside of the lanostane wikilink. Boghog (talk) 18:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Also changed "hypothetical" to "prototypical". Boghog (talk) 19:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image which accompanies introduction: molecular structure of 24-ethyl-lanostane, a "hypothetical steroid"
Talk:Temple (novel)

message: (This is a work in progress which will be updated soon. In the meantime, maybe you should read the book.) 
*This article has way too much detail - an encyclopedia article isn't a book report or a fan site; it should provide enough material to give the reader a sense of what the book is like and about, and to allow the reader to put it in context in literature, society, history, or whatever context is legitimate - but it shouldn't detail the entire plot. As you rightly say, let people read the book if they want all the details - but right now, nobody is going to read this article because it's so long and, frankly, boring. DavidWBrooks 14:55, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Next time, put information before the stub tag and categories, not after.--KrossTalk 19:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It maybe opinion, but I've read the book and would say that whoever wrote that is telling the truth =p. A Prodigy (talk) 16:15, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Clark Memorandum

message: Ouch! This stub (barely) raises more questions than it answers. "The Clark Memorandum was officially released in 1930 by the Herbert Hoover administration. " What did it deal with? Who was Clark? Why is it important (if it is)? The article is an orphan.
Okay a quick google search shows:
* http://personal.atl.bellsouth.net/w/o/wol3/clarkjr2.htm J. Reuben Clark issued something called the "Clark Memorandum on the Monroe Doctrine". Is this what we're talking about?
* http://www.law2.byu.edu/Law_Society/publications/clark_memorandum.htm shows that there is also a magazine called the "Clark Memorandum".
Hm -- Infrogmation 15:19, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Im sorry. I don't know what I was thinking. I left out half of what I had written about the Clark Memorandum.  I hope it makes more sense now. Perl 15:26, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, thanks. -- Infrogmation 15:55, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Seamanship

message: removed "a knoghmfhgh" from first sentence 137.155.255.254 (talk) 22:29, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit 

message: Can someone add a reference to the supposed origins of the word seamanship pls Frelke 21:27, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: From the Dutch 

message: Can anyone add some definitions of the types of typical jobs crew would perform on a ship? pls —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.232.186.116 (talk • contribs) 
*This is a huge list.  A typical job on a ship can be anything from the mundane (pumping the bilges) to the esoteric (find an obscure job and name it!).  Formal manuals of seamanship are your best source here.  Fiddle Faddle 21:15, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Typical Jobs

message: This article could benefit from a section (or a separate article) on maritime communication.  Morganfitzp (talk) 00:12, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Communication
Talk:List of Amiga games

message: I'm not a fan of preemptive- or over-disambiguation (esp. since games typically get the shaft), but editors to this page need to keep an eye on link destinations for common names. It's pretty obvious that pages like Stalingrad, St. Thomas, and Manchester United won't be about computer games. --Mrwojo 16:53, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: apparently so, http://www.amigaflame.com/amidem36.htm --Imran 00:08, 21 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  *Blink* *Blink* Okay then. You, sir, have just blown my mind. Apparently they haven't stopped improving the Amiga just because of a small thing like the end of Commodore. --Kizor 12:45, 21 May 2004 (UTC)

text: I've just come across this page for just such a reason.  I've removed the link concerned, but the over-linking, mis-linking, and reddlinking on this page is absurd.  Simply removing them all would probably be a pretty good start.  Alai 03:53, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm working on it. Punkmorten 18:47, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Common Names

message: It would be really nice if someone pruned this list with :Category:Amiga games. Punkmorten 19:35, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:Amiga games 

message: This article is currently 65 kilobytes long. I'm thinking of splitting it into three separate articles:
* List of Amiga games: A-H
* List of Amiga games: I-O
* List of Amiga games: P-Z
Opinions? JIP | Talk 17:53, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like the sensible thing to do, go for it. —Pixel8 18:01, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is too long 

message: Just one question: Are CDTV and CD32 games included in this list? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.184.70.203 (talk) 18:58, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CDTV and CD32 games 

message: When I'm clicking e.g. on "contents" > "Z" when I'm on site "List of Amiga games: A-H" (or I-O) it does not work. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.184.70.203 (talk) 19:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: uh why is this separated? --89.180.38.217 21:33, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  navigation problem
Talk:Classical period (music)

message: in where the harpsichord and piano are first mentioned, please consider that,most piano hammer are covered with felt instead of leather nowadays. 24.77.96.251 (talk) 22:26, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:26, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

text: I would add -- I think this level of detail looks a little out-of-place in the lede, and (if we discuss it at all in this article) should be in a subsequent section. Antandrus (talk) 00:32, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 October 2021 

message: — Assignment last updated by Christopherbowers176 (talk) 00:48, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Public Musicology
Talk:Parsec

message: Still no one has answered this.
Which is correct?
"1,000 parsecs (3,262 ly) "
or
"A megaparsec is one million parsecs, or about 3,260,000 light years" Katkahosz (talk) 07:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Oxford Dictionary of Astronomy, one parsec equals 3.2616 light years, 206,265 astronomical units, or 30.857 × 1012 km. Skeptic2 (talk) 08:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  3262 or 3260?
Talk:Sleeping Giant

message: This ext lk can't go on a Dab pg, but does offer opportunity for researching Sleeping Giant (Pembrokeshire), and then adding a Dab entry to the accompanying Dab page:
: Article on the Sleeping Giant at Newport Pembrokeshire in Wales, UK.
--Jerzy•t 13:59, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ext  link
Talk:Argumentum ad crumenam

message: I don't pretend to be an expert on logical fallacies, and certainly not on their Latin names. But, even so, the example and the claimed meaning of arg. ad crumenam given here don't match. Some expert in one or the other is needed to untangle this arg. ad mismatch. ww
This is a valid logical fallacy, I'll ref it. Please wait on the CSD. 69.116.150.174 18:13, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No; that would be Argumentum ad populum -DasRakel (talk) 23:43, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 23:12, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-01-31 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: These are both puny articles about appealing to a person's level of wealth. Let's at least merge them into one. Richard001 (talk) 08:31, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Support merge. It is really unsatifsfying to read such stubs. Leaving redirect in place will make the information just as easy to find, but put it in better context.Yobmod (talk) 12:47, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: "An argumentum ad crumenam [..] is the formal fallacy of concluding that a statement is correct solely because the speaker is rich"
I don't think so. If I conclude that a statement is correct because the speaker is rich and old, it is still ad crumenam. Even if I conclude that a statement is correct because the speaker is rich and his reasoning is sound, it is still ad crumenam. Are there any sources for the "solely"? --Hob Gadling (talk) 12:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No sources forthcoming, so I removed it. --Hob Gadling (talk) 13:19, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solely?
Talk:Sketch comedy

message: I realize that we need a section which deals with the fact that amateur groups do sketch comedy, and it's not just on TV, but this section is all over the place.  It's way too general, and doesn't really inform about anything (except, I would say drag is an important point to keep). Leadpipevigilante 11:24, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amateur Section 

message: I've created Wikipedia:Notability (comedy) to help editors in deciding the notability of comedy- and humor-related articles. Please help hammer it into shape. --Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 08:56, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia:Notability (comedy) 

message: As this article, and its adjoining article List of sketch comedy groups have listed comedy groups by their nationality and medium (radon, stage or TV), do you think it would also be wise to list, or at least make reference to the different genres of sketch (etc Pythonesque/Surreal, Parody, Linear, Recurring characters, Gross-out humour,   Word play, Topical and Constructed). Yes, yes, I know most sketch shows will cross-genre, but so far all that links them is their structure. Wha’ya think?
: I don't think it's a good idea. As you say, many span genres, and genre can at times be a very subjective thing. --Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 14:20, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 

message: The article as it stands is atrocious. The tone is unencyclopedic and it's unreferenced. I will be going through soon, cleaning up what I can, and removing what needs to be gone. --Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 06:28, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to find room in this article to focus on the comedy sketch form itself (meaning the elements and structure of a single sketch); Comedic_sketch redirects to Sketch_comedy, which right now is really about actors performing sketch comedy revues on stage, television and radio. Or should it be in a separate article? Drench 17:03, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. Do you have any sources for this? --Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 21:50, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All I have are notes from my time at the Second City Training Center, which I suppose means I can't cite them. I'll see if I can find other sources before writing anything. Drench 14:30, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current state of the article 

message: I removed the claim that The Red Green Show is the longest running live action comedy in the world. It was removed from the shows page after being refuted there.Blackskyshining (talk) 07:54, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red Green Show Longevity 

message: — Assignment last updated by Mgferris13 (talk) 22:01, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Honors English 250H VL1
Talk:List of tectonic plates

message: I came here looking for information about the areas of the tectonic plates. It seems like the sort of information that ought to appear in an encyclopedia article. Here's a source: http://geology.about.com/library/bl/blplate_size_table.htm. Would it be a good addition? Ishboyfay (talk) 17:42, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Areas
Talk:Ken Wilber

message: An edit war is occurring as an editor is attempting to add promotional descriptions in the lede, calling the subject variously a scholar (subject has no degrees and does not teach at an accredited institution), a philosopher (subject is not known for any contributions to philosophy), or both. I do not know the subject, but I do know he is neither a scholar nor a philosopher. Ifnord (talk) 17:06, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Puffery comment 

message: There was a poll on IntegralWorld.net about which books are Wilber's best. Although the results of the poll shouldn't be featured in the lead section (because the opinions aren't professionally published ones), I think that it should be mentioned somewhere in the body of the article what the top picks were, in order to give other readers interested in Wilber a good idea of where to start with his large output. Do you agree? If not, why? AndrewOne (talk) 17:07, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is based on scholarly sources, not on fan's favorites. That's what fansites are for. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 18:12, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of "fan favorites" somewhere in the body? 

message: So nothing about the pseudo-scientific 'Q-link' that Wilber endorses (see: 'Norman Einstein ...')? And no mention of 'NORMAN EINSTEIN, The Dis-Integration of Ken Wilber', and 'Stripping the Gurus: Sex, Violence, Abuse and Enlightenment' by GEOFFREY D. FALK? YadaYadaYetMoreYada (talk) 15:28, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Q-link?
Talk:Mianne Bagger

message: "She had researched the issues herself and, also through personal experience, realised that concerns were unfounded. All organizations that prevented her from competing had never actually done any research but had merely adopted a blanket ruling without question.[3]"
Either:
1. This sentence is poorly written.
2. This sentence isn't written in the wikipedia voice and isn't neutral.
3. Some combination of 1 and 2
4. I'm imagining things.
Someone fix please.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benevolent Prawn (talk • contribs) 22:07, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This sentence is bad
Talk:USS Port Royal (CG-73)

message: The Port Royal could only hold 1 helicopter as the superstructure was built from aluminum instead of steel, main deck up was all aluminum 2603:7000:CA00:EB09:15F3:B886:9444:B505 (talk) 15:58, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Source? - wolf 23:05, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of helicopters
Talk:Cherwell (district)

message: The article gives a phonetic pronunciation "Charwell" but this is only used in the south of the district and in Oxford. In the Banbury area the pronunciation is as written "Cherwell". I'm not sure how to render this in IPA or how to add the characters to the page. Bruern Crossing (talk) 22:11, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't either; but in the north of the county at least, the "Cher" part of "Cherwell" is pronounced like the "Chur" in "Churn". It's true that several words are pronounced differently in Oxford; the best known examples are "Charwell" (for Cherwell); "Maudlin" (for Magdalen) and "Isis" (for Thames). Even the name of the city has different pronounciations depending upon whether you're a native of Oxford, come from the county outside the city, or are a university student. It's a hotbed really. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:42, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:2000 Spanish general election

message: The  official page from Spain's interior ministry has different numbers. I suspect this is because our page currently does not include absentee ballots. Miguel 21:39, 2004 Mar 19 (UTC)
The data at my website, which I copied into this article, were taken from the Spanish government website at the time of the 2000 elections. Possibly they did not include the absentee ballots. Adam 02:47, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Vicar of Dibley

message: Why is Geraldine marked as "Geraldine Kennedy"? It wasn't until the last episode that she married Harry, and even then it isn't said that she took her husband's last name. Also, where do the "nicknames" of some of the characters come from and why is Frank Pickle said to be an escaped convict? 101090ABC (talk) 09:20, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A few notes. 

message: I have corrected the assertion that Alice "never" understands the joke - she does in at least two episodes. Smurfmeister (talk) 21:40, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Alice and the jokes

message: Why does the heading of this talk page say that this article is of interest to WikiProject Buckinghamshire when the article says that Dibley is set in Oxfordshire?Vorbee (talk) 20:18, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Why WikiProject Buckinghamshire?

message: A year before The Vicar of Dibley began, French, along with Jennifer Saunders, did a sketch in their show French and Saunders (series 4, episode 2) in which French (in character) states that she has been accepted as television's first female comedy vicar. I have no idea whether filming of "The Vicar of Dibley" was already under way by then, but could this be worthy of mention, perhaps in a trivia section? — Paul G (talk) 08:09, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worth mentioning ''French and Saunders'' episode? 

message: Kirby, Heather. "Under starter's orders." Times, 5 Nov. 1994, p. 5[S1]. The Times Digital Archive, link-gale-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/apps/doc/IF0502092633/TTDA?u=wikipedia&sid=bookmark-TTDA&xid=bf688dea. Accessed 8 Oct. 2022.
pitman, joanna. "The real vicar of Dibley." Times, 13 Apr. 1995, p. 13. The Times Digital Archive, link-gale-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/apps/doc/IF0502128770/TTDA?u=wikipedia&sid=bookmark-TTDA&xid=b17467cd. Accessed 8 Oct. 2022.
"Dawn French finds religion." Age [Melbourne, Australia], 15 June 1995, p. 5. Gale Academic OneFile, link.gale.com/apps/doc/A295483680/AONE?u=wikipedia&sid=ebsco&xid=ccd72645. Accessed 8 Oct. 2022.
Coin945 (talk) 02:25, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources