Talk:Aaj Tak

message: The channel is showing things that are against modern free thought. Absolute nonsense. They even report solar, lunar eclipse as thought about 1000 years before and not only that they try to spread religious fear among the people by telling them lies like don't eat food, don't drink water, pray etc. Are we living in 5000 B.C. Shame on the channel for spreading such lies. A real shameful thing, trying to divert scientific advance with fear psychosis. Who gave them awards. Shame shame.Freeworldforever (talk) 09:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Liars

message: :Image:Aaj-tak.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:53, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Aaj-tak.gif

message: The 'Owned by' section of this page is subject to a lot of vandalism, with supporter of a political party adding the rival party's name to the actual owner (India Today Group). Please refrain from using Wikipedia as your personal scrapbook.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by HarshithBhat (talk • contribs) 07:13, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have reverted the petty vandalism and warned the user on his talk page. If the vandalism continues please ask for page protection at Wikipedia:RFPP. Thanks--Neelkamala (talk) 07:45, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extreme Vandalism 

message: Pulkitbhatnagar007 (talk) 19:04, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Owned By Indian National Congress 

message: a user is trying to completely remove the section as if nothing like it ever happened even there is a statement from aajtak on the whole issue.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.193.203.188 (talk) 20:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no rule that says a "controversy section" should be added to every article. We do not add everyday news events like this to the article nor do we give undue coverage to it. Have you read WP:UNDUE and WP:NOTNEWS yet? Ugog Nizdast (talk) 07:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trying to add Controversies section 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:52, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion