Talk:Jada Pinkett Smith

message: Why is there nothing in the article (or in the talk page, for that matter), regarding Smith's hair loss?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.212.139.99 (talk) 03:41, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm. In the real world, alopecia areata affects 1 out of every 500 to 1,000 in the U.S. Though the causes are not fully understood, it is known to have an autoimmune component. Sounds like you're referring to androgenetic alopecia, which is different from alopecia areata. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:52, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hair Loss 

message: Shouldn't there be some brief mention under the "Personal" section of the Oscars indecent? There are plenty of items in that section which are less material, more trivial, than this indicent 78.19.232.48 (talk) 10:45, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oscars indicent 

message: Currently, this article is included in :Category:Polyamorous people. But, why? Source? Even if she has had sexual relationships outside her marriage, with or without permission, that's not necessarily polyamory. ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:16, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for polyamorous? 

message: She had her husband assault someone over a bald joke. You need to have her recent profile pic represent how she looks and acts these days. Update the profile pic to one that shows she's has no hair. Represent powerful black women! 2600:1005:B0F3:734B:CC0B:3E95:AA2F:B333 (talk) 15:31, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The profile pictures don't have to be a recent photo. Just a nice picture of the person. PeachyBum07 (talk) 18:46, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update profile photo to something more recent 

message: Something about her recently racist views and comentaries should be added to the wiki. Alejojojo6 (talk) 14:32, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, about her latest "documentary" about Cleopatra 213.233.108.137 (talk) 04:59, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies 

message: I noticed that a marriage "end" date was listed as 2016. That's incorrect. The Smith's were separated but NOT divorced. There should be no "end date" at this time. There's nothing wrong about discussing their separation in 2016 but let's be factual. It's the one thing I don't like about Wikipedia. Some people have added, removed, or made up what they call "facts" on various celebrity pages. So, I rely on Wiki about 60% of the time. Sgaines0719 (talk) 21:06, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marital Status 

message: I added this article to the category, but Firefangledfeathers removed it, saying "article supports her making a related donation, but not being a member".  Subject is not a Scientologist, but she wasn't added to Category:American Scientologists.    Her donations and recent discussion of using Scientology study technology to homeschool her children merit the categorization. Feoffer (talk) 02:35, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There's nothing in the article about "using Scientology study technology to homeschool her children", so that wouldn't meet WP:CATV. The current amount of content related to Scientology suggest that WP:CATDEF hasn't been met either. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:40, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I stand corrected!   I've added material, though perhaps not in the ideal spot.   Take a peek. Feoffer (talk) 05:01, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good placement! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:17, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Scientology