lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:KompoZer

message: As someone who has a good understanding of html and used/learned how to use dreamwheaver i'd be very interested to learn what this things features are.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.88.37.113 (talk) 04:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  features 

message: I think this article needs fleshing out.  There is a reference to a download.com article in which subject is compared positively with a defacto standard of the industry.  But when was it first created?  To the previous point, what is its feature history?  Who maintains this?
TelecomNut  (talk)  16:13, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: A merge might be a good idea - sooner rather than later - if KompoZer is as it seems, nothing more than a maintenance branch of Nvu waiting for a replacement.  There is already a lot of duplication of information here from the Nvu article.  86.47.161.201 (talk) 12:07, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: NO MERGE
(1) No, it is much different from Nvu. Use the program; read the reviews.
(2) Stop making anonymous edits. Dogru144 (talk) 23:03, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Robert Kaiser - one of the senior figures within the developement of SeaMonkey - reports the following:
http://home.kairo.at/blog/2009-02/seamonkey_composer_development_coming_ba
( that URL is complete - despite looking as though truncated )
summarized as follows:
1: KompoZer 0.8 in alpha - this is mainly a port to Gecko 1.8.1 -
"The 0.8a1 version is much more stable than the 0.7.x branch, which was already significantly more stable than Nvu 1.0."
2: The intention to port to Gecko 1.9.1 - "possibly by backporting KompoZer to SeaMonkey Composer" - resulting in KompoZer existing as both a standalone editor and the future version of SeaMonkey Composer.
These are not yet finalized plans, but talks are under way...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.25.120.198 (talk) 04:50, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 2009 - Possible Enhancements In KompoZer Project
Talk:Yau gok

message: Are they eaten in Hong Kong as well? Badagnani 16:59, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a part of traditional Hong Kong food as well because it is traditional Cantonese food.  --JNZ 13:07, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hong Kong?

message: If the first syllable is pronounced with a "Y" sound, then "Jau" is not a good romanization to select for this title. People just don't know that the Jyutping romanization uses "j" to represent the "y" sound--they expect this primarily only in German and Nordic languages. Badagnani 17:22, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 
Talk:Zero waste agriculture

message: The article is generally in a bad state, it is part of WAS' WP:SYNTH offensive (see:Talk:Factory farming). Unless notability, verifiability, and encyclopedic value is increased, I think it might be a good candidate for delete/merge. Thanks!--Cerejota 04:51, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What are the merge candidates ? Permaculture perhaps ? That is the closest I could find on the list at Sustainable agriculture. Wizzy…☎ 17:39, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues
Talk:Alexandria Bay, New York

message: I've been trying to get Bill Johnston Pirate Days in the Local Events section for a few weeks now, but everytime I post some info on it, it gets deleted within hours. Why? Its one of the biggest events in Alex Bay all year, and is probably the most talked about and looked forward to event in the area. If its that theres no proof, look at alexbay.org, which is right in the Outside Links section at the bottom of the page. I just want to know what I have to do to make sure that Pirate Days isn't going to get deleted. I just went to it a few days ago, I got video of myself there and of some of the things that go on, its not fake, so why is it being deleted?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.59.31.58 (talk) 05:02, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mattawa, Ontario

message: Mattawa is also a town in Grant County, eastern Washington state, between the US Military Yakima Firing Centre and Hanford Energy site.
Duly noted; I've added a link to other Mattawa towns. ConicProjection (talk) 16:14, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Talk:John Carmack (disambiguation)

message: I would suspect around 95% of everyone searching for John Carmack is looking for the idSoft guy, it would be better to just have a link to the other guy at the top of John D. Carmack's page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.208.148.119 (talk) 08:12, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Finally! Thank you for getting objective evidence for something that's intuitively obvious and has been bugging me for a long time. :) Good job! Nairebis (talk) 00:57, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks, I was just about to dab Special:WhatLinksHere/John Carmack again until I remembered this awesome tool! —LOL T/C 01:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Canon EOS 40D

message: Admittedly there was a lot of copy and paste from the 30D article. I hope the tone is encyclopedic enough. --Christopherlin 05:11, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start of article

message: It seems several of the us retail websites list the 40d as out of stock. Is there a supply problem? --67.112.123.22 08:26, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  shortage?
Talk:Michael Smith (newspaper reporter)

message: Michael Smith suggested on the BLP noticeboard that the title is now incorrect - he is no longer a journalist, but now more accurately described as an author. I'm inclined to rename the article accordingly, but I thought I'd raise it here to see if there were any objections. - Bilby (talk) 13:35, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Any other Michael Smith authors? If not, go for it I guess. --Malerooster (talk) 16:44, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Does this matter?--Malerooster (talk) 16:45, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page rename
Talk:Superbad (disambiguation)

message: Should the contents of this page be moved to Superbad (disambiguation), and then redirect this page to Superbad (film)?  It's my opinion that the film is pretty clearly the most likely target of a search for "superbad" at this point, although the James Brown song is pretty excellent.   Thoughts?  JavaTenor 05:15, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Kumamoto Prefecture

message: Editors appear to be following a Japanese outline for the article. I was not aware there was a separate one. "Prefectural symbol" was a new subtitle to me. I would have put it "elsewhere." Not sure where.
The article lacks inline footnotes and will ultimately be tagged by someone, I would think.
Notables need to have their own separate article. Being part of a band, is not notable IMO. I think most agree with me on that one.
I would put "tourism" under economy. Otherwise it sounds like a travel article. Aren't some US bases there? They employ local workers. And the military, by implication, spends money outside the bases. And not just on booze! Probably aren't any academic studies on this, unfortunately.
BTW, this is the first time I have realized the Kyushus had four prefectures. I had assumed one until now! Probably needs to be in other articles, if it isn't already. Student7 (talk) 12:40, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Some observations

message: We need government information in a subtopic. Is the governor of the prefecture appointed or elected? Are their national articles that describe a prefecture organization that can be linked? Student7 (talk) 17:54, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Government
Talk:Dvals

message: I am removing it, as when I try to load it, it results in the "Not Found" error... perhaps if someone can find a working page, please put it back up. There is no point in having a non-working page as a citation, however.--Yalens (talk) 15:04, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I will provide another link.--Bouron (talk) 16:32, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: http://www.theotokou.org/bulletins/Oct03holy.html
Talk:Faint hope clause

message: I have assessed this as a Start Class, as it contains more detail than would be expected from a Stub Class, and of low importance, as it is a highly specialized topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 15:59, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: To what does the "faint hope" in the Faint hope clause refer to? What is there a faint hope of, which renders this clause necessary? (Or what "faint hope" does this clause provide?) Or am I misunderstanding it, and it really is the Faint-Hope clause, e.g. named after Mr. Faint and Mr. Hope? In which case, the capitalization of the title should be changed and info about who Mr. Faint and Mr. Hope are should be added to the article. -- 128.104.112.147 (talk) 19:16, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't looked through the history myself, but my wild guess in the dark is due to a lack of reliable sources. If you have a reliable source that explains the origin of the name, then feel free to add it in again. Singularity42 (talk) 17:41, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of Name
Talk:Aerostructure

message: The Military subsection in this article is shoddily written, with incoherent wording featuring only Boeing products. This text has little substance or relation to the technical and historical explanation that should be the subject of the article. 104.11.160.217 (talk) 09:30, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Military' section worded like clumsy Boeing advertisement
Talk:ERAM

message: I deleted the {advert} maintenance tag.
Advertising seeks to sway decisions. Descriptions of ERAM improvements may have been part of advertising to the governmental agencies choosing between competing systems; but that context is past; it's not the context here.
Those choices are now part of public policy DEFINING normative operations.  Now, descriptions of improvements do not seek to persuade or sway decisions; they EXPLAIN the rationales for decisions already made.
That was true when the {advert} tag was added. I'll leave it to readers to infer the reasons for the tagging.
LoneStarNot (talk) 14:38, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  advert maintenance tag dropped
Talk:Standard rate turn

message: Surely the radius of turn formula is incorrect.  It should read TAS(kt) ÷ rate of turn × 60 × pi
--10FEB2012 It was incorrect. The original writing of the formula used RateOfTurn(1,2,3) * 60, where RateOfTurn was a selection of 1 or 2 or 3. However, there was an edit made to change 60 to 20, which would make RateOfTurn have to be 3, 6, 9. Easier to say rate of turn in degrees * 20 than rate(1,2,3) * 60.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.192.238.39 (talk) 20:21, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Split S

message: The three refs are not very helpful, it seems to me. The first mentions the manoeuvre without description, the second describes it briefly at the last seems not to mention it all. There must be citable sources fo aerobatics somewhere. I'll have a look but others may have them to hand.TSRL (talk) 16:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: The video does not show a Split S. A split S starts and ends in level flight, whereas Cpt. Stricklin rolls his aircraft while in a steep climb before pulling into a reversing loop. This maneuver is called a Reverse Half Cuban Eight. There are plenty of references on this, including Wikipedia's and the page at The Ejection Site specifically referring to Stricklin's maneuver, ejection and crash. I'm new and nervous about screwing something up on the page, so I'm pointing out the factual error and hoping an experienced editor fixes it. I'll watch the page for a bit and, if no one posts a problem with this, will try to make the correction myself (move the video and caption to the correct page). Kabeyun (talk) 03:12, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Video Caption

message: Is it me or is there an inconsistent use of the term g-force, i.e. G-force or "Gs"? 
This is all too prevalent in books and magazines, TV etc. Use of "G" is Universal Gravitational Constant not acceleration which is denoted "g".
Maybe someone better at it can make any necessary edits. Roy Szweda (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of "g" for g-force
Talk:Fox Wars

message: Why are the names of Indians italicized throughout this article? 72.229.41.235 (talk) 09:08, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it is an old-fashioned typography convention, related to the italicization of foreign words. Rmhermen (talk) 15:20, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: — Assignment last updated by Afh1858 (talk) 14:31, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: HIST3443 The Frontier Before 1850
Talk:Abby Hagyard

message: DesertAngel 05:57, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

message: has made a number of edits to the article, and has since posted on my talk page. If anyone is watching this page and wants to reply before I get round to it, please feel free. -- John of Reading (talk) 21:39, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of interest

message: *A new website was added. I'm retaining it, fixing the formatting
*The birth place was removed from the "persondata". I'm restoring to match the infobox
*:Category:Canadian business consultants was added. This is unsourced and is a red link.
I encourage other editors to find more sources and improve the article. Disclaimer: I mostly stick to fixing typos. -- John of Reading (talk) 10:11, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: External links etc
Talk:Foxmail

message: The section about 8-bit characters in the header was called "Privacy Violation", but the reason for encoding header fields is to make the header be all 7-bit, not privacy. The encoding would be just base64. I hope I made the nature of the problem more clear. JoeBrennan (talk) 18:07, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Privacy Violation 

message: I've been trying to find some numbers on the number of Internet users in China in 2003, but I couldn't find that. There are some English books on Internet in China but they all seem written by political scientists who focus on the censorship and Falun Gong oppression without providing any basic statistics like a graph on Internet users by year. FuFoFuEd (talk) 06:57, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It was hard to find, but I eventually did find a good graph detailing China's historical internet use: <http://www.digitaleastasia.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Chinese-Internet-Population-CNNIC-Jan-2010.png>.  According to this graph, there were 79,500,000 internet users in China in 2003. I hope that you find this information helpful! Ferox Seneca (talk) 09:10, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Market share?
Category talk:American science fiction writer stubs

message: this and Category:American science fiction writers seem like they are the same
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.197.243.41 (talk • contribs) 20 August 2007
:See my reply at Category talk:American science fiction writers. (And in future, I suggest that if you have a question, you should only ask it in one place at a time, to avoid potential confusion.) --Paul A 06:15, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What is the difference?
Talk:Treasure Island (TV franchise)

message: Where is the exact location of the show ?  Arthasfleo
:I believe There are two islands that have been used.
:The Island used most often is in the Mamanuca group of islands. However it's so small that I can't actually find it on Google Maps or in satellite photos. There are two islands in very close proximity (at low tide it's possible to walk between them, otherwise it is a short swim) - one serves as the 'hero' island, and the other is used by the crew. No permanent accommodation exists on either of those islands.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.28.207.39 (talk) 10:27, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks man Arthasfleo  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arthasfleo (talk • contribs) 10:01, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Location

message: Azmy25: It's a good idea to provide an edit summary with every edit. —Anomalocaris (talk) 09:17, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit summary
Talk:Battle of the Transdanubian Hills

message: Suggest the current name of the article be changed (the current title is both vague and grammatically incorrect) to either Battle of the Transdanubian Hills or Battle of the Drava Valley.  I prefer the former because it is more accurate in geographic terms for the area in which the battles took place. If no comments or other suggestions are made, I'll make the move around 11 February, using the first suggestion. Comments? W. B. Wilson (talk) 11:53, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Move made per comments above. W. B. Wilson (talk) 09:46, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested move of article name 

message: Were any Hungarian units involved in the fighting?
Is "Battle of the Transdanubian Hills" found in sources? Perhaps this should be moved to "Drava Operation". —Srnec (talk) 00:23, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hungarians?
Talk:Feather and Bone: The Crow Chronicles

message: I have only read the second book, and, as you can see, there is a woeful lack of material on the first and third. If you have read these books, please help. --RainbowWerewolf 06:26, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've read the first book and I'm in the middle of the third.  I'll add information about the first book immediately and finish with the third book when I complete reading it. Pumagirl7  Leave a message 13:54, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

text: UPDATE: I've given the page a massive overhaul with information from the first and third book, as well as changing a few words to make something clearer or maintain neutrality.  Unfortunately, I'm afraid I wasn't able to remove the orphaned article boilerplate, but something might be done about the other one.  I'll be getting a WikiOtter to clean the little things up and it should be looking good. Pumagirl7  Leave a message 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Somebody Who Has Read First and Third Books Please Write About Them

message: So, nobody on Wikimedia Commons has pictures related to Feather and Bone: The Crow Chronicles.  I do not know how to get pictures from other sites onto Wikipedia, not to mention there may be issues with copyright laws.  If anybody would be so kind to help me, that would be wonderful. Pumagirl7  Leave a message 13:55, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This is no longer the case thanks to wonderful work by the user Sloggerbum! Pumagirl7  Leave a message 13:18, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover Art 

message: Okay, so there is an orphan article boilerplate that remains up.  It has been up for 2 years and 4 months.  If you click the "suggestions may be available" link, nothing shows up.  I hate these kinds of boilerplates, but obviously I have no idea how to remove this one.  If anybody could find somewhat related articles to link to this page from so that it could finally become a full article, that would be perfect! Pumagirl7  Leave a message 13:22, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphan Article 
Talk:Ray Raphael

message: I must point out that the credibility of Gregor Milne's arguments contra Raphael are for this editor greatly diminished by his repeated inability to keep "principle/principal" straight (“...suffering based on principal rather than self-interest...”; ”...they had to, not, largely, because of principals...”), and his not capitalizing Fort Mifflin.--F.N. Wombat 06:26, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Credibility of critic?
Talk:Michael Asen IV of Bulgaria

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Michael Asen IV оf Bulgaria. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Regards, SONIC678 02:33, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Michael Asen IV оf Bulgaria" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Battle of Ihtiman

message: In the page, the same Bulgarian source, 1 of the 2 sources in the page, it is mentioned that the Ottomans could not reach Sofia, which was their main objective, so the battle could not remain in Ottoman victory because Sofia was not invaded until 1382. Slava History (talk) 12:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The battle
Talk:Yellow tea

message: This article is pretty much useless. As far as I can tell it is merely a paraphrasing of another website which also has no sources sited. Oolong tea is also often yellow. There needs to be some disambiguation here (between Green, Yellow, and Oolong), just as one would explain the terms "red tea" and "black tea" on a page for black tea.
Inaccurate information is worse than no information. DaBOB (talk) 17:33, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stuartholme School

message: pics? more refs. welcome Victuallers 21:20, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:It's Morrissey, Man!

message: While it is possible that the writer of "Puffing Billy" was the US songwriter of Western music, I doubt it - it's more likely that it's the Stan Jones who was a member of the quartet. So until someone actually can demonstrate which it is, am reverting to original. Regards, --Technopat 07:16, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  reverted
Talk:St Columban's College, Caboolture

message: alumni? pics? Victuallers 21:23, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MLauba (talk) 10:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:HMCS Crescent

message: The giant picture should be sized down a bit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by WillNotGive (talk • contribs) 22:32, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  That's a big picture 