lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Effie Gray

message: Recently the file :File:Euphemia ('Effie') Chalmers (née Gray), Lady Millais by Thomas Richmond.jpg (right) was uploaded and it appears to be relevant to this article and not currently used by it. If you're interested and think it would be a useful addition, please feel free to include it. Dcoetzee 03:55, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New file [[:File:Euphemia ('Effie') Chalmers (née Gray), Lady Millais by Thomas Richmond.jpg]] 

message: On-site gondola scenes shown in the photo blog of a local extra:
http://iamnotmakingthisup.net/12516/venice-starring-me/
Probably not encyclopaedic, but shows that Effie is not in "pre-production", it is actually "in production" right now. 82.131.210.163 (talk) 18:50, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effie movie already being filmed in Venezia 

message: I was wondering while recently translating this article - shouldn't the title be "Effie Millais" instead of Effie Gray? I don't think it's customary to keep the maiden name in the title in case of married women. Viktorhauk (talk) 13:33, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This is mainly determined by WP:COMMONNAME. For example Shakespeare's wife is usually referred to as "Anne Hathaway", not "Anne Shakespeare", but Michelle Obama is usually known by her married name, not Michelle Robinson. In this case the fact that she was also Mrs Ruskin complicates matters further. Paul B (talk) 14:44, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why not ''Effie Millais''? 

message: Biographers and researchers have shown a ghoulish obsession with Ruskin's claim that he didn't
consummate his marriage because he found some aspect of his wife's person disgusting. He also said
that human women were not as he had imagined them to be, based on his experience viewing nude
female statues. Some writers have believed he was upset by Effie's public hair. Others thought she
must have been menstruating, and the "disgusted" bridegroom glimpsed blood. No one seems to have
reached the most obvious conclusion, which is that Ruskin was impotent, then and always. He knew it,
and fabricated an excuse which would cast the blame on his wife rather than himself. As one biographer
dolefully put it, "Ruskin is not known to have had sex with anyone, ever." That's rather compelling
evidence of incapacity.
Younggoldchip (talk) 16:29, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ruskin's Real Reason for Not Consummating His Marriage
Talk:A Huey Freeman Christmas

message: http://www.history.com/minisite.do?content_type=Minisite_Generic&content_type_id=1253&display_order=1&sub_display_order=2&mini_id=1290 which is not the same one that Huey mentions. Although pointing out the true history of Christmas is useful, it is more detremental than good if it is done wrong.--X37 09:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The historical accuracy of Huey’s account is irrelevant to the topic at hand. The only thing pertinent to the synopsis of this episode is that he delivered a version of the history of Christmas that was subsequently ignored by Granddad. Though the explanation may seem equivocal to some, this is an expected outcome, and it is not necessary or appropriate to contend the character’s argument in a setting such as this. This isn’t an article debating the history of Christmas; it is an article that explains the events of this episode.—GrittyLobo441 15:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: True History of Christmas

message: The article itself says that it premiered on December 18th, but the box to the right sys it premiered on December 26th. Does anybody know which is correct? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ron Stoppable (talk • contribs) 22:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing this out. The correct date is the 18th.—GrittyLobo441 19:14, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airdate? 

message: Is there a reason this doesn't link to the primary source (i.e., the episode itself) on the Adult Swim website?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.3.18.178 (talk) 18:19, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary Source?
Talk:Austin Stacks GAA

message: Please Wikify the follow before readding 
ONE OF THERE GREAT PLAYERS BARRY JOHN WALSH SON OF DENNY WALSH SCORED 1 GOAL AGAINST KERINS O RAHILILYS HES A RISING STAR.Austin Stacks were famous all around Ireland during the 1970's and 1980's.Players like mickey sheahy and ger power,just a few lads of the tip of the tongue.Watch out for players in the future like Barry shanahan and paul Barrett (Gnevin 19:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikify 
Talk:Rose La Touche

message: Wikipedia has some inconsistencies regarding Rose la Touche. The article on Effie Gray states that Rose was engaged to John Ruskin, but the engagement was broken due to Effie's advice to Rose's mother. But this article and the article on John Ruskin says that they were never engaged. The article on Rose says she was 10, not 9, when she met John Ruskin. I suspect there are more conflicting accounts. I don't know which of these are correct.--Wonderbreadwop 14:27, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Some sources say she was 10, some say she was 9. It depends whether they met before or after her birthday. As for whether they were engaged, that depends on how you define engaged - they had a sort of "understanding", but technically they were not, since she never actually said yes. Paul B 14:41, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Having checked some sources the evidence is that she was in fact 10 when they met, but that Ruskin himself says she was 9. Paul B 15:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

text: There is no contradiction. We can't say for certain what caused Ruskin's mental decline. The other article says Effie's intervention "probably" had an effect. Effie's letter confirmed Rose's parents' opposition to the marriage, hence the concern described here. As this article also states, Rose did not need their approval after she was 21. Her rejection of Ruskin then was on religious grounds - or at least she said it was. Paul B 01:24, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistencies 

message: I've deleted this reference--according to the page on imdb that it linked to, Neve Campbell was cast in the role of Effie, not as Rose.  I haven't seen the movie (it doesn't seem to be available on DVD), but I strongly suspect that its entire 14 minutes were devoted to the Ruskin/Effie marriage and probably doesn't even mention Rose.  If someone has seen this and can verify or challenge this speculation, please do so.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Camille Desmoulins (talk • contribs) 03:58, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Passion of John Ruskin (movie) 

message: I think this is a problem arising from the fact that the word "precious" is not used in the way intended very often these days - i.e. delicate, or fragile. I know of no evidence that Rose was especially precocius (advanced for her age), but there is a great deal that she was precious. Of course the word can be changed to a more common modern usage. Paul B (talk) 20:50, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I think, on reflection, that what I just wrote is baloney. Paul B (talk) 20:59, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Precious/Precocius

message: This article talks a lot about the relationship with Ruskin, but isn't clear whether that continued up to her death.
What are the last known letters between the two, for instance ?
What did Rose do once she reached adulthood ?
-- Beardo (talk) 22:29, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Later life
Talk:Mindless Ones

message: The Midnless Ones are featured in one of the mid-nineties Doctor Strange holograph color issures, wherein Stephen gathers the original Defenders to give Dormammu another smack down. I'd normally pop this right in but someone's taken to rewritting the whole article (which is fine). Lots42 (talk) 05:30, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Add In? 

message: ...it looks like the current storyline ("Hell Comes to Birmingham") is going to add quite a bit more about the Mindless Ones, as the villain is claiming to be their creator. I'll try to put some words together. --Mrph (talk) 22:43, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Captain Britain and MI13 

message: The Mindless Ones appear in 'X-Men #88 May 1999' when the X-Men try to help other-dimensional beings endangered by the Juggernaut. Lots42 (talk) 23:33, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Cameo/Note for later 

message: Hello,
in the article first stands that the Mindless Ones live in the Dreath Dimension and second that they live in the Dark Dimension. In Germany it is called "Dunkle Dimension" what means Dark Dimension. What's richt? GGR27 (talk) 16:43, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dread Dimension or Dark Dimension
Talk:Fathi Shaqaqi

message: It seems like this is mostly unsourced and the information about his death contains a lot of speculation. Are there sources for the information about his death and what may and may not have happened?
71.194.162.55 15:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a scathing review (http://www.danielpipes.org/805/gideons-spies-the-secret-history-of-the-mossad) of the book mentioned in the Telegraph article (book and article written by the same person) that is used as a source. Whether or not the Mossad was behind it, the article hardly serves as a reliable piece of evidence. SeverityOne (talk) 10:43, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Gentile Bellini

message: This article seems to need a little help!  I did a very hasty reorganization, as it was quite repetitive - but I think some of the content could be revisited, as well.  And I don't have time at the moment...  For now, I also removed these two statements because I feel that they could use a citation - I had understood that Titian may have worked in Giovanni's workshop (not Gentile's) before joining Giorgione's.  Anyway, reference?
"In his last years he was the first master of Titian. He passed away having been shot by a jealous, adulterous wife in 1507."  Isocephaly (talk) 00:23, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure & Content
Talk:Fawaz Akhras

message: This living person's biography currently gives no clear indication as to notability on which to base a stand-alone article. Notability guidelines relevant to this subject include WP:BASIC criteria (substantial coverage by multiple, independent, third-party reliable sources) and alternative criteria at WP:ANYBIO and WP:ACADEMIC; WP:INHERITED notability is insufficient. The following links may be of help in finding reliable coverage that is substantially about this subject:
*
*
Happy editing! JFHJr (㊟) 22:35, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Should probably be deleted. FunkMonk (talk) 01:44, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

text: I think the article should stay. He appears to have generated a large amount of interest in the news. His name brings up 174 articles in google news . And he appears to be part of the Assad ruling circle based on the leaked emails and embassy cables.--Guest2625 (talk) 08:07, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Due to the continued lack of reliable sourcing, I'm replacing the notability tag. Currently this article indicates he WP:INHERITs notability, which is not appropriate. Google hits are irrelevant. Only reliable sources are relevant. JFHJr (㊟) 18:52, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The article in itself should stay as far as NOTABLE comments be part of it. Without proper source attribution, those parts should be removed. 2A02:8388:1600:C80:BE5F:F4FF:FECD:7CB2 (talk) 16:01, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability and sourcing 

message: Currently the article is biased and not objective. More than 50% are claims without sources. How can this be please? 2A02:8388:1600:C80:BE5F:F4FF:FECD:7CB2 (talk) 16:00, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias and Objectivity 
Talk:Type-I superconductor

message: I think that the statement is incorrect. BCS theory explains that attraction between electrons leads to superconductivity. This applies to all Type I superconductors and to some Type II superconductors. Which Type II? alloys of metals but not high temperature superconductors (such as cuprates). TomyDuby (talk) 04:29, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type I superconductors and BCS theory
Talk:Hakim ibn Hizam

message: Any editors out there? Is this article notable to warrant its own article. It is badly written and badly sourced. I can not myself find much information to improve it. Any help would be appreciated. Mbcap (talk) 10:47, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a few things. I think the article is now worth keeping.Petra MacDonald (talk) 15:09, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this article notable?
Talk:Hot-carrier injection

message: Looking for some references for this page
Jsgski (talk) 08:24, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

message: The part that says that it's a worse problem at low temperatures is suspect. afaik the explanation is just wrong, The mean free path is proportional to temperature, but I'm not really sure it works that way for charges in semiconductors (it'd be really weird if it did).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.206.126.112 (talk) 20:48, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  temperature dependence 
Talk:Avrami equation

message: Is the integration done properly?  i dont think so, can someone double check this?  Currently it states that the integration of dVb=Vbe(V-Vb) equals ln(1-y)=Vbe/V. I think it should equal ln(1-Y)=Vbe.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.91.173.42 (talk) 02:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

message: The link to IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminolgy in the external links section is dead. Does anyone know where to redirect?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Physicsman19 (talk • contribs) 14:04, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Link
Talk:Quadratic Gauss sum

message: I have looked in several books (Ireland and Rosen, Fröhlich and Taylor, et. al.) and have seen different notations for gauss sums, but not the one used here. Is this article really most representative of current standards in this area? (I am not an expert here, just interested - so comments from experts would be helpful!) Madmath789 21:44, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there is an entirely standard notation. G(χ,ψ) as at Gauss sum is pretty standard. This notation is OK, really. (I will claim to be a Gauss sum expert.) Charles Matthews 16:08, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK - I have also since found an example that agrees with the article (Apostol) - and I knew about your thesis being in this area :-) Madmath789 16:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standard notation 

message: When evaluated at n = 0, the definition gives m, but the explicit formulae in Evaluation of Gauss sums do not agree.--80.136.153.37 08:39, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  n = 0? 

message: I was shocked at how incomprehensible this article was, in the large part due to the unsourced material on "Generalized Gauss sums" added by a single editor on June 14/15, 2008. While a relatively straightforward generalization, it is not common. For example, none of the three standard references in the article even define it! On the other hand, the classical quadratic Gauss sum mod p is neither presented in an easy to understand format, nor are its properties explored and explained. I even had a hard time locating its value, partly due to the unusual notation, and the question of the sign of the Gauss sum that, by his own admission, stumped Gauss himself for four years, is glossed over. I see two possible solutions:
* Move the big section on "generalized Gauss sums" to a separate article "Generalized quadratic Gauss sum" (if the material can be sourced), preserving the edit history if possible (this may require administrative gimmicks).
* Roll back to the version immediately preceding its addition and go from there. 
Opinions? Arcfrk (talk) 02:12, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generalized Gauss sum
Talk:Synod of Ráth Breasail

message: i presume the source is unclear as to what provinces the dioceses were in? Morwen - Talk 21:47, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sadly, yes, simply mentioning that Armagh was the northern and Cashel the southern.Lozleader 09:12, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was in the local library this morning, and found four books on Irish history of the period that mentioned the synod, and they all contained the same information: 2 provinces, 12 dioceses  each, Waterford and Dublin not included because they were Viking dioceses, already subject to Rome via Canterbury. But no definition of the 2 provinces. It's obviously obscure, and an arrangement that only lasted about 40 years. A possible source is The Church in medieval Ireland by John Watt (1972) is quoted as a reference in two places, but it's not in my library. Lozleader 13:16, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sky Cabs

message: Note the ICAO code and callsign are not current - October 2006 MilborneOne 21:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ICAO 

message: An An-8, presumably ex Skycabs, is parked in a playground/park next to the terminal at Bandanaraike airport!!--Petebutt (talk) 21:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: An-8
Talk:Palmitoylation

message: I'd like to see sections on the exact chemical reaction, perhaps the enzymes that enact palmitoylation, and also the biological role of palmitoylation (directing proteins to the membrane).  I don't know much about palmitoylation, but if I have time I'll look stuff up and try to add it. --MPW 21:50, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: The page has the text: "palmitoylation is usually reversible (because the bond between palmitic acid and protein is often a thioester bond)." However, there is no direct primary citation for this and the link to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palmitoyl_protein_thioesterase indicates that that enzyme acts during protein degradation, which would not mean that palmitoylation is "reversible" in the implied sense (which is that the protein can have the palmitoyl removed and continue to act, but with different subcellular localization due to the removal of the palmitoyl group).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.100.24.41 (talk) 06:42, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  reversibility
Talk:Hind bint Maktoum Al Maktoum

message: The image used in the Infobox is not of the article's subject. I think this should be removed from the Infobox and placed elsewhere within the body of the article, obviously with an appropriate caption to explain the relationship of the two bearded men to the female in question. Nick Moyes (talk) 23:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate Infobox image 

message: Did he not die recently? ErnestSkinner (talk) 04:37, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death of Prince 

message: I am a retired employee of Governor of Pakistan Railways and I want to be given UAE work visa security guard waiter or job visa I want to work in UAE my father has lived in UAE Ajman for 20 years and I also want That I want to work in UAE 182.182.4.57 (talk) 12:09, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Why on earth are you putting that here? This is not a job posting site. 2600:1700:BC01:9B0:9C79:2F96:30B8:D6C5 (talk) 04:05, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Give mi UAE vesa
Talk:Holcombe, Greater Manchester

message: Is this place in Bury (metropolitan borough) or Lancashire? It is currently contradictorary and ambigous. Jhamez84 21:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Isn't the correct name for Holcombe Hill actually Harcles Hill?
:See this discussion on the Ramsbottom talk page. It should be changed to Harcles Hill. -- ricmitch 09:27, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  See this note about a picture. -- RHaworth 15:31, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holcombe Hill
Talk:N7 road (Ireland)

message: Somebody (annonymous) has gone through nearly all the Irish "road" articles and added (miles) after the distance in kilometers. He gave the lenght of Limerick N7 tunnel in furlongs.
This is cluttering up the text, is pointless, adds nothing and my POV is this nonsense should be deleted. The Mile is longer a legal measurement  unit on Irish roads.
Zoney - your views please??
(Sarah777 21:27, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's unnecessary, but there are other articles where unit conversions are provided (sometimes controversially - e.g. providing metric on US articles). I didn't even know that tunnels were measured in furlongs in non-metric systems. zoney  ♣ talk 20:03, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Miles and Furlongs

message: I've created pictures for junctions 20 to 32. I will edit the appropiate pages to include these.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trans5999 (talk • contribs) 22:19, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Junction Numbers Finished 

message: Two comments:
The LILO junction westbound after Citywest (signed for Citywest Hotel, mostly) now has signage proclaiming it to be Junction 3A. I'd add it but theres no logo-box for it; anyone got the art skills to add one?
Also, a photo of 'The Ball' at the Maudlins Interchange (J9) would definately compliment this article, if anyone has one? --85.134.188.52 (talk) 23:37, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  J3A/The Ball 

message: Following the upgrade, the old "Newlands Cross" interchange no longer exists, so I've made a couple of edits.  But my question is, are the junction numbers affected?  It seems the new off-ramps are part of J1?  Can anyone please confirm?  I feel the edit is still incomplete. Nelson50T 19:49, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newlands Cross 
Talk:Union representative

message: Please explain the capitalization of the term, 'Union Steward'.  In this article it appears without being capitalized as well as being capitalized.  Which is correct?--Sponsion (talk) 12:50, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization 

message: Shop steward is a very particular phrasing, that does not conceptually differ from union representative. The Shop steward link has no interlanguage wiki links, while this article does. Shushugah (he/him • talk) 21:16, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boldly merged [[Shop steward]] here 

message: Does a union Steward have the right to administer disciplinary action to a union worker if his performance is not acceptable? 98.196.196.64 (talk) 02:32, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Union Steward
Talk:Nortel Norstar

message: I think the article should be renamed Nortel Norstar or Norstar. Meridian Norstar is outdated. Steven312 22:08, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: . I reversed the redirect. The name was changed, after all. Sorry this took 15 years. — voidxor 20:57, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Propose move to Nortel Norstar

message: Neither Norstar Modular Integrated Communications System (MICS) nor it's little brother the Norstar Compact Integrated Communications System (CICS) support Meridian Mail.  The Norstar Applications Module (NAM), the many variants of the Star Talk (Mini, Flash), or the newer Call Pilot 100/150 are supported voice mail platforms for the MICS.  The CICS only supports the Star Talk variants or the Call Pilot 100/150.  This article should be changed to correct this error.72.230.61.207 01:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: . I removed the mention of Meridian Mail, which was lacking a reference anyway. Sorry it took 14 years to address. — voidxor 20:50, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Doesn't support Meridian Mail

message: This article is not based on facts, but rather mis-informed opinion. It does not do a good job of providing useful information about the Norstar Key System  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.92.122.209 (talk) 17:11, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree we need a expert to assist with this page.  I will tag the page.  Geek2003 (talk) 17:59, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request Expert
Talk:Pay 'n Save

message: Copy-edited today, as requested. Tag now removed. thisisace 21:15, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy-edit

message: All information from Yard Birds has been merged into this article, per the AfD result for the Yard Birds article to be merged to this article: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yard Birds. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:25, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger complete