lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of bicycle part manufacturing companies

message: Anyone considering adding a manufacturer to this list should keep in mind the following from the Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists) guideline:
"Ideally each entry on the list should have a Wikipedia article but this is not required if it is reasonable to expect an article could be forthcoming in the future."
To test the reasonableness of your expectations, you may want to create the article on the manufacturer first and then add it to this list.  UnitedStatesian 18:55, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion criterion 

message: I think the suggestion to merge the article and/or the list ignores the unique history and character of the French industry. The bicycle was invented by the French, as was bicycle racing, and the French bicycle industry grew up around those twin facts. To merge the French industry into a larger list would be to lose sight of the French contribution to cycling. I think the article and the lists in the article should remain as they are. Blue Order (talk) 06:13, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging French bicycle industry and/or List of French bicycle manufacturers into List of bicycle manufacturing companies
Talk:Kedah Darul Aman F.C.

message: any confusion about the league system in Malaysia please refer to History of league football in Malaysia
--Nowner 18:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

message: semoga berjaya pada semua perlawanan liga super 07/08  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.208.91.130 (talk) 03:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  kedah baik punya 
Talk:Taipei Fubon Braves

message: This article is now outdated due to the fact that the team has already been sold to Taiwan Mobile.  I have only changed the article title- nothing else has been done on the body of the article.  Unfortuantly I haven't been able to find much info on the new logo, team info, and such.  Feel free to add in any info that you know about this new team.  -Jawen (talk) 03:38, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Outdated Info
Talk:Lyckantropen Themes

message: Where did these track titles ("# PQ Entry: Nofvjo224010") come from? Are they the ones officially listed on the album? I've never seen them listed like that. = ∫ tc 5th Eye 00:34, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I pulled them from Allmusic.com. Surely somebody with the actual CD could check for us? -leigh (φθόγγος) 03:24, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's a better source: the Jester Records page itself. Also, metalstorm.ee, a less-reliable source. But yeah, someone with the actual CD should check. = ∫tc 5th Eye 06:25, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Jester Records (Ulver's official label) > Allmusic.com - changing it to conform with Jester until it can be disproven by CD.--Astavats (talk) 01:34, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Track titles
Template talk:British motorcycle manufacturers

message: old version
Major and Notable British motorcycle marques
AJS - Ariel - BSA - Douglas - Excelsior - Matchless - Norton - Panther - Rudge - Royal Enfield - Scott - Sunbeam - Triumph - Velocette - Vincent HRD
[ edit ]
draft mk3
atempt at mk 4
OK plumped for mk3, mk2 is below for preosterity Pickle 17:29, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Navigation sandbox 

message: In compliance with
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_motorcycle_manufacturers#Added_list_criteria
I have removed AJS from the current manufacturers.
Until such time that a distinction between "current marques" and "current manufacturer" can be made, this has to be shown as a badge engineering company, as no motorcycles in their range are of their own construction, with nothing to prove otherwise. Dates given are those from the Wikipedia article of the builing of motorcycles to the last AJS Stormer replica development ending in "1980," although a more accurate date is needed.
Update: Article cites replicas being built up to the year 2000 - cutoff date for manufacture updated in list.193.61.104.8 (talk) 02:00, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Badge Engineering
Talk:Silence Teaches You How to Sing

message: It sucks 105.112.62.198 (talk) 13:01, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real fact
Template talk:Motorcycle marques of the United States

message: I see a lot of one-off custom bike builders listed in this template.  It misleads the reader into thinking they are a factory that mass produced motorcycles rather than a custom builder making bikes to order.  Any objections to removing them?--Dbratland (talk) 22:46, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No real objection from me, although I'm not sure where the bigger custom builders like Big Dog or (I presume) Confederate would fall. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 17:34, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose removing all Builders; only keep mass produced motorcycles
Talk:Grand Boulevard, Joondalup

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 08:46, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style
Talk:Felicia Hemans

message: Current article states
Ancestry
"Of three daughters, only Felicia married" 
Early life and works
"Of her two sisters, Elizabeth died about 1807 at the age of eighteen and Harriett Mary Browne (1798–1858) married first the Revd T. Hughes, then the Revd W. Hicks Owen" 
AnnaComnemna (talk) 10:50, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for spotting and flagging the mistake. It was a recent change. Confusingly Felicia's mother was called Felicity. Anna (talk) 22:38, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction.
Talk:River Derwent, Yorkshire

message: As the Derwent enters the River Ouse above the Trent Falls it empties into the Ouse as this does not become the Humber until after the falls. It is the Hertford River which rises near Filey, not the Derwent. The Hertford is a tributary of the Derwent.(See British Ordnance Survey Maps.)Harkey Lodger 18:46, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The image of the Derwent catchment area has "jumped out" of the infobox. Can anyone fix this,please?--Harkey Lodger 11:46, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do not see the problem. Is it browser specific? Keith D 12:02, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I am using IE6 at the moment, will look later at Firefox when I get home to see if there is a problem there. Keith D 13:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just checked and no problem with Firefox 1.5.0.10 Keith D 18:56, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox image. 

message: I have added a river features/route map to the Barmby section. Others to come later if they are OK--Harkey Lodger (talk) 18:08, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route diagrams/maps 

message: As the guidelines Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about rivers‎ suggest starting lists etc. starting at the mouth, I am considering restructuring this article to have the text structured that way too. Any comments?--Harkey Lodger (talk) 18:28, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not working well. Starting at the mouth for a description of the course makes for difficult reading.Back to the drawing board, I guess.--Harkey Lodger (talk) 16:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restructuring 

message: Is this river's name pronounced "Derwent" or "Darwent"? 109.145.172.118 (talk) 23:03, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Crimean Mountains

message: I suggest moving this article to Crimean Mountains, as it is much more established than the current, Yayla Mountains. Google gives 55,600 hits for "Crimean Mountains - Wikipedia" and 1,270 hits for "Yayla Mountains - Wikipedia". —dima/s-ko/ 18:47, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: IMHO It's a good idea. Additioonal argumet for the move: Yayla is only one (the highest and the most significant) of the three chines, Crimean mountains consists of. E.g. mountains near Bakhchisaray are part of Crimean mountains, but not part of Yayla dağ. Don Alessandro 19:36, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, then I will move it now. Could you please fix/add the Crimean Tatar names for the mountains and hills I just added into the article, as I do not know the language. —dima/s-ko/ 20:17, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested move

message: I am truly no geologist myself, thus don't know enough to add section about geology to the article, sorry. I liked to know about formation of Crimean Mountains and geologic relations to Caucasian Mountains to the east. Without knowing i just suspected they were the westernmost part of mountain ranges to the east, just separated by a depression partially flooded by the sea. Just a speculation of mine, for sure. Comparing the German version i missed informations as well as here, thus i do hope another user could improve the article, so it wasn't a stub any longer. Kind regards dear wikipedians, Erwin --Stamnariophilus 08:41, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing section about geology and relation to Caucasian Mountains
Talk:KW-26

message: I don't understand the newly added claim that "The benefit of traffic-flow security was lost each time new cards were inserted." An adversary would know that the circuit was down for a brief period while the circuit was resynchronized, but I don't see how that would materially aid in traffic analysis.--agr 18:49, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: traffic flow security

message: My understanding from my senior NCO's  of the time was that it was KW-7's that were on board the Pueblo, which would make sense in terms of the physical  room constraints on a vessel of that size. I was also given a general brief on the modifications that were undertaken on the KW-7 as a consequence of the device being compromised.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.252.32.63 (talk) 05:14, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Pueblo Affair 

message: According to NSA report "Report on the Assessment of Cryptographic Damage Resulting From the Loss of USS PUEBLO (AGER-2)" dated 28 July 1969, the following cryptographic machines were on board: one KL-7, two KW-7's, three KWR-37's (receivers), and 4 KG-14's.  In addition were key lists(used and future), repair kits, etc.  In other words, there were no KW-26's.http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/_files/uss_pueblo/Doc_1.pdf
98.109.213.65 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 05:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crypto Equipment Aboard the USS Pueblo Did  Not Include KW-26's or KG-13'S
Talk:List of speakers of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives

message: Perhaps the Speaker for 1690 and other dates was Joseph Growden rather than Joseph Growdon? See Growden Mansion for mention of Joseph Growden. --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:08, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joseph Growdon or Joseph Growden? 

message: The linked person died in 1724 but is listed here as a speaker in 1725 and 1727. — INS Pirat (talk) 23:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  William Trent 

message: Compare
1. https://web.archive.org/web/20090327104237/https://www.dgs.state.pa.us/pamanual/lib/pamanual/vol_117/sec3_past.pdf (page 14/28) which is a list of Speakers of the Provincial Assembly from a reliable source.
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_speakers_of_the_Pennsylvania_House_of_Representatives&oldid=1051641524 (the version of this page as of 18:34, 24 October 2021), which appears to show the Speakers of the Provincial Assembly as in (1).
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_speakers_of_the_Pennsylvania_House_of_Representatives&diff=1055251157&oldid=1051641524 which shows a large number of unsourced changes to dates. For example, Isaac Norris (statesman) died in 1766 but is now shown as having been Speaker in 1776.
I suggest that the dates should be restored to how they stood in (2). Comments? Alekksandr (talk) 20:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Now done. Alekksandr (talk) 21:34, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Major vandalism?
Talk:Ed Gardner

message: As a result of some research, I found the copyrights for these images were not renewed.  Full details can be found on the file. Because of this conversation, am changing the licenses of the images in the NBC Parade of Stars portfolio to public domain-copyright not renewed. We hope (talk) 19:33, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change in licensing for [[:File:Duffyst.jpg]] 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Soman

message: User:Soman
      run at Mon Jan 15 18:52:59 2007 GMT
Category talk:	14
Category:	378
Image talk:	6
Image:	1104
Mainspace	14565
Portal talk:	5
Portal:	135
Talk:	993
Template talk:	103
Template:	608
User talk:	235
User:	861
Wikipedia talk:	77
Wikipedia:	260
avg edits per article	2.78
earliest	12:04, 11 May 2004
number of unique articles	6967
total	19344
2004/5 	3 	
2004/6 	54 	
2004/7 	456 	
2004/8 	145 	
2004/9 	401 	
2004/10 	994 	
2004/11 	386 	
2004/12 	346 	
2005/1 	478 	
2005/2 	331 	
2005/3 	76 	
2005/4 	449 	
2005/5 	723 	
2005/6 	68 	
2005/7 	10 	
2005/8 	18 	
2005/9 	1528 	
2005/10 	1280 	
2005/11 	835 	
2005/12 	2172 	
2006/1 	420 	
2006/2 	204 	
2006/3 	638 	
2006/4 	875 	
2006/5 	668 	
2006/6 	967 	
2006/7 	845 	
2006/8 	680 	
2006/9 	581 	
2006/10 	938 	
2006/11 	537 	
2006/12 	728 	
2007/1 	510 	
SoMan's editcount summary stats as of 18:52, January 15th 2007, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 18:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Soman,
Your Request for Adminship (RfA) process was reviewed and studied by our research team at Carnegie Mellon University early in our project to gain insights into the process.  We reviewed what voters discussed about your case, and what qualifications you brought to the table as a candidate.  In total 50 cases were personally read and reviewed, and we based our further research questions in part on your case.  
In continuing our research, I would like to personally invite you to participate in a survey we are conducting to get perspective from people who have participate in the RfA process.  The survey will only take a few minutes of your time, and will aid furthering our understanding of online communities, and may assist in the development of tools to assist voters in making RfA evaluations.  We are NOT attempting to spam anyone with this survey and are doing our best to be considerate and not instrusive in the Wikipedia community. The results of this survey are for academic research and are not used for any profit nor sold to any companies.  We will also post our results back to the Wikipedia community.
This survey is part of an ongoing research project by students and faculty at the Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science and headed by Professor Robert Kraut.
Take the survey
Thank you!
If you have any questions or concerns, feel free comment on my talk page.
CMUResearcher (talk) 19:19, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Participation in Wikipedia Research
Talk:Bill Peet

message: It reads like a middle school biography and has no in-text citations.
---------
The article's also way too Disney-centric. There's a line that even says "Peet is known mostly for his cartoon illustrations for his children's books..." but the entire entry is still framed around his work at Disney and with Walt Disney. Pariah23 11:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs work. 
Talk:Loma people

message: If the umlauts do not represent an actual umlaut sound, please substitute the closest non-IPA sound so that readers unfamiliar with IPA may correctly read and pronounce the text.  The IPA can also be given.  The same is true for the accents, which I had interpreted as tone marks.  Badagnani 19:04, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Umlauts
Talk:Ocean Reef Road

message: Notes for later expansion - The Freeway to Wanneroo Road part of the road, together with Coyle Road/Craigie Drive and Mullaloo Drive, were originally gazetted as a road to Mullaloo Beach (which first emerged around 1966 as a coastal resort, but grew slowly due mainly to Perth people buying second homes there and lack of services - didn't even have mains power by 1969). Next section (Freeway to Marmion Avenue) was built before 1977 (date?) to service the new suburbs of Heathridge and Beldon. Between 1981 and 1984 sometime, the roads adopted their current alignment and the Marmion-boat harbour section was built. Wangara section built in early 1990s. 1999 or 2000 - extended 100m to link with Hodges Drive; 2006 expanded to Shenton Avenue. Orderinchaos 03:22, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fokker Spin

message: Any idea where to get specs for this airplane? I have looked all over the internet (at least everywhere I know to look).  I will look for some book references too.  I have added some inline citations from another site.  I would like to find som ebook refs though as well. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:24, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  specifications
Talk:Priscilla S. Asagiri

message: While the original Priss remains a popular and important figure in the world of anime, there has been some backlash against the original Priss herself, as some fans felt that too much of the series was devoted to her at the expense of the other characters' development and storylines, and that Priss's storylines were generally very banal and repetitive as they tended to revolve around her seeking revenge for a friend of hers outside the Knight Sabers. Some fans have even gone so far as to accuse the Priss character of being a selfish, unsympathetic character as well as a fairly unintelligent one, in light of her inability to control her temper, her frequent attempts to attack bigger, stronger opponents, i.e. boomers without her hard suits, and other subtle signs that suggested a lack of common sense, and that her sense of "honor" was very shallow, and that she wasn't even a particularly good fighter.
Isn't this ridiculous fan speculation? It's hardly appropriate for even an article, as it attaches a connotation that only a fringe group of fans give to Priss. It's nothing but a bias paragraph with no sources in any fan community boards or sites and has no place in an objective Wikipedia article.
The Bubblegum Crisis 2040 page states that her middle initial stands for 'Sonoda'; I don't know if that was only added after the original series, but does that warrant mention in the 2040 section here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashiyura (talk • contribs) 00:20, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First header
Talk:Devastator Peak

message: Hi Black Tusk...in future, please always check the "Find Location" search in the provincial basemap at http://maps.gov.bc.ca, as any official form of a name will be in there.  I'll come back with the Canada Geonames Database link, too, but that should google easily.  For anything stateside, the http://www.topozone.com site has a full USGS names index built-in, but searching is a little limited there because of, e.g. "Mount XXXX" you have to know is "Mount XXXX" instead of "XXXX Mountain" or "XXXX Peak", as it searches only for whole strings/words, or for names only beginning with a certain word.  Other than that, it's exhaustive.Skookum1 19:47, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Official name stuff
Talk:Radio Hall of Fame

message: Since the 09 inductees have been announced, the list of 08 nominees is obsolete.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dkendr (talk • contribs) 13:15, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  08 nominee section 

message: Okay, it's probably notable, if it ever turns out to actually exist, but right now it appears to be comprised entirely of a website run by this Bruce Dumont guy.  The article definitely gives the impression that this is some building that one can visit, much like one could visit the Rock'n'Roll HOF or Baseball HOF, and should probably be corrected to reflect the fact that currently, this "Hall of Fame" is entirely in the imagination of one man.  Which COULD be a strike against it in terms of notability.  I mean, I could start a website and claim to be the American Radio Hall of Fame; how would that be any different than this one?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.71.69.114 (talk) 20:15, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is an old comment but probably still valid.  There's no third-party citations for all of the main info on this page.  Although a quick Google search does turn up that the "radio hall of fame" will apparently be opening, the article definitely needs some reliable third-party-sourced info.ArchieOof (talk) 19:25, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is notable now. The place definitely does exist, and the article has been updated accordingly. There are plenty of sources cited. Bruce Dumont is gone. The museum, or rather, a gallery, is a permanent location, on the second floor of the Museum of Broadcasting at a fixed address in Chicago. There have been industry-chosen inductees and publicly-voted inductees each year since 2015. The 2018 vote was during June, with awards in November. I think the article, and the organization, has been improved a lot since both prior comments. (As of 2009 and 2011, they were valid, in my opinion!) I am going to clean up the article, as there are bare links and other poor formatting here and there.--FeralOink (talk) 14:09, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable? 

message: It is no longer the National Radio Hall of Fame. The current name, as reflected at the official website, is the Radio Hall of Fame. All its old links, including nationalradiohalloffame, now redirect to http://www.radiohalloffame.com/. --Tenebrae (talk) 16:28, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change
Talk:Museum of Broadcast Communications

message: The current intro tells all about what the museum will have and show, but doesn't explain what it is, as the prior intro did.  The article needs editing for basic grammar and references.Goldnpuppy (talk) 15:34, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Presumably you are referring to this version of the page, which was reverted to this version after you commented. It seems fair to say the latter version is more encyclopedic by Wikipedia standards (see WP:MOS).--JayJasper (talk) 19:17, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction
Talk:Union label

message: A picture would improve this article a lot, but obviously all the union bugs/labels are trademarks, and besides wouldn't adding it look like we were claiming that all the editors were union members?  Maybe we could mock one up.  Marnanel (talk) 16:29, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Surprisingly to date, six years later, there are yet very few union labels on Commons as best I can tell, and no union label category. While transcribing public domain documents to Wikisource I have uploaded a couple. I've added one to the article for example, which I find to be an interesting one with some history (eg Fredy Perlman)...I would also add an Allied Trades Council one, as these are extremely common, but the one that I had uploaded I had cropped out the local number to implement as formatted text on the Wikisource page. I'm not sure how heavily trademark may be an issue; surely there are ways to show real union labels in ways that don't somehow portray any official connection. Off the top of my head, it could be an angled photograph of a union label in the corner of a printed document. djr13 (talk) 06:37, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 