lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pennsylvania Route 171

message: how can a map published by the Pennsylvania Department of Highways not be a wp:primary source when it comes to a highway in Pennsylvania? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 21:14, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The raw GIS data used to make the map is the primary source. The map is a secondary source. Dough4872 21:17, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  This isn't specifically about maps this is about the Pennsylvania Department of Highways, how can something they publish about a highway in Pennsylvania not be primary? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 21:19, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Pennsylvania Department of Highways is a first-hand source, their maps are secondary sources. As I mentioned, the raw data to make the map is the primary source. Dough4872 21:46, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: How can their maps about themselves be anything other than a primary source? If Walmart publishes a map of Walmart stores thats a primary source for info about Walmart stores, if the Pennsylvania Department of Highways publishes a map of highways in Pennsylvania thats a primary source for info about highways in Pennsylvania (such as Pennsylvania Route 171). Horse Eye's Back (talk) 21:52, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I get the feeling that you wouldn't like any map used in this way, not even the ones by Rand McNally. --Rschen7754 22:21, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm ok with using maps as primary sources as long as its due in context. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 23:22, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Published by Pennsylvania Department of Highways but not primary? 

message: can you provide the reliable independent sources you believe exist which support your claim of notability? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 18:32, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Memphis Belle (aircraft)

message: There were a lot of B-17s during the war. Was this one notable in some particular way? The Memphis Belle was not the first B-17 to complete 25 missions. (If not this article should be deleted) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.212.28.50 (talk) 17:49 May 10, 2007 (UTC)
:The notability of the Memphis Belle is addressed in the introductory paragraph of the article - it was chosen to be a case study for the 1944 documentary film, as well as the 1990 Hollywood feature film.  Those films, plus countless references in print media, certainly make the Memphis Belle notable. —Krellis (Talk) 18:19, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability question 

message: I think it would be a good idea to list the crew somewhere on the page. Only Captain Morgan is listed. The normal crew (I say that because others occasionally were involved with the plane) can be found on the Memphis Belle website:  []  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.34.148.110 (talk) 03:13, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  It would be nice to list the crew members.  And just one of them died recently. . KyuuA4 (Talk:キュウ) 05:10, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, here's the list.  KyuuA4 (Talk:キュウ) 05:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  List the Crew? 

message: While the Memphis Belle was the first Eighth Air Force bomber to return to the US, it was not the first to depart England upon completion of a combat tour. The first to leave was "Hot Stuff," a B-24D from the 330th Bombardment Squadron of the 93rd Bombardment Group, which departed on May 3 with Lt. Gen. Frank Andrews, commander of US Army forces in the ETO and Marshall's probably choice to command the Normandy Invasion, on board. After overflying Prestwick, Scotland, the crew continued on to Iceland, and found that the weather had deterioriated in snow and rain. While attempting to land, the airplane hit a mountain and all aboard but the tail gunner were killed. Incidentally, General Andrews was a native Tennessean who had grown up in Nashville. The surviving tail gunner lived in Memphis after the war.SamMcGowan (talk) 05:41, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Bomber to Return to the US 

message: As an inanimate machine which is not a ship, this aircraft is referred to as "it" on Wikipedia. --The Huhsz (talk) 18:14, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronoun 

message: listed are 14 names, although a B-17 only needed 10 as crew and as one can see several "functions" are duplicated! Should really be oindicated more clearly! 80.151.9.187 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 10:04, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: AND WHAT ABOUT: "... (flown by Lt. C.L. Anderson)" - Lt. C.L. Anderson is not even listed as Pilot!!! 80.151.9.187 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 10:08, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Again subject of crew
Talk:Ellen G. White Estate

message: I added a tag for insufficient citations. Article should depend throughout on reliable secondary sources, and these must be noted in inline citations or other Wikipedia approved style. 
    The required Neutral Point of View (NPOV) needs work. As of now the article reads rather like the White Estate’s own self-description, or a writer’s regard for the topic. Including some of the published concerns re: the work of the Estate and some of the challenges it’s addressed would help resolve the promotional sound. NewBluePencil (talk) 00:43, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia article guidelines
Talk:The Book of Dreams (Vance novel)

message: Like much of Vance's work, this story has major inconsistencies. The most obvious is why Treesong, last of the Demon Princes is not aware of the fate of the other four. The first two, the alien and the Methuselah, are shadowy figures, but 3rd and 4th are well known and their deaths would have widely publicized. Treesong would have been anticipating danger, and with his vast resources been engaged in protective and proactive measures. But he completely unaware until he sees his picture on Cosmopolis's cover.   
So what does Teesong do when he sees the cover? He tries to infiltrate the contest with one young women, who has no training in espionage. This is also illogical and inconsistent: Treesong would have dispatched a large team of investigators to discover what was happening at Cosmopolis.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2D80:882A:0:914E:B65:6E91:2975 (talk) 22:22, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency
Talk:The Partner (Grisham novel)

message: I just finished reading it. How do we know if Eva disappeared with the money; or if she was captured by the bad guys, was tortured, and forced to hand over the loot? What did Grisham intend, if not to leave it up in the air? 68.226.60.230 (talk) 02:06, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ending of The Partner by John Grisham
Talk:American system of manufacturing

message: The content of "American system of manufacturing" fits more or less to industrial revolution that has taken place in many countries in Europe and North America. If this article is valid at all it would require a discussion what makes the "American?" explicitly differ to other countries at that time. Maybe there are other sources that source number 1 to show that?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.31.107.145 (talk) 19:20, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Talkboy

message: What happened to the original version of this article? (See "Article History")
Can this article just be copy/pasted from its orginal form as recorded on the Answers.com entry?
:I believe someone was disputing the legibility of the article. If they actually did some research, they'd find their suspicions incorrect. So I've put it back. M3Plus 04:56, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Beasley Broadcast Group

message: When listing stations, please include their frequencies and the cities they are based in; listing only the calls and the state they are in is not enough. -- azumanga 03:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There linked so someone can findout if they want o follow the link and it doesn't take up as much space on the page.  RJFJR (talk) 16:28, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Station Listings Need To Be More Thorough
Talk:Lottery games with a lifetime prize

message: Win For Life also exists as a scratch-off ticket in New Jersey. It's a bad deal--the grand prize being $1,000 a week for life, with NO cash option.  
There also exists a NJ Lottery Win For Life scratch-off that offers a prize of $5,000 a week for life.
Most "lifetime" lottery games, however, DO NOT have a cash option. They should be avoided. 216.179.123.201 20:17, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because there's nothing inherently superior about a lump sum. There's always those who say they can get a better return than the lottery's annuity rate, but in reality most winners spend of the principal and never see any return at all. There's actually more money to be had in a non-lump-sum prize. Whether or not that makes for more purchasing power depends on inflation, but that's a different concern. oknazevad (talk) 03:18, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

text: So long as you don't screw around with spending all principal as it comes in, and manage to save much of it, the inflation issue will not be a problem.oknazevad (talk) 03:18, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment
Talk:Daimler 250

message: Daimler 250 V8 should be merged with this. Seasalt 13:54, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I laughed out loud when I saw the "stub" notice on this article.  A Daimler sports car being characterised by a Renault 4!  Whoops!  --King Hildebrand 19:39, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incongruity!
Talk:Suspended cymbal

message: I removed the bolding on It is essential to check this before committing to a particular technique and I took out the following two sentences: Unfortunately, up until they do start to break, they give a superb sound! This has been the subject of some controversy and will continue to be so because I felt these degraded from the encyclopedic nature of the article. Bagpiping Scotsman 04:11, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits
Talk:Lead zirconate titanate

message: What is PZT? — Omegatron 04:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I work for a company that produces PZT.  While much of the process is covered under TS/SCI guidelines, I wonder if perhaps I should share some of the process (that which is not classified) on the article.  Something along the lines of "Production"  or "Typical Production."  Touching on of course a generic process of production, following through firing, and then plating and testing of the material. Would that be considered original research, or rather something from an experienced operator?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kitsunedawn (talk • contribs) 13:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be great if you could add something.  My advice would be to keep your comments brief and expand incrementally.  If you have a good review or book discussing how this stuff is made, such a citation would be welcome.  To save you time and pain in your edit, avoid anything that reads like instructions or "tips".  Wikipedia tries to avoid being a user manual.  But generally, we have too few editors with real world technologists.  --Smokefoot (talk) 23:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info from experienced PZT creator? 

message: Not sure on the fix procedure, but reference 1 appears to be inactive.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.227.111.138 (talk) 21:23, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 1 Link Broken
Talk:Real World/Road Rules Challenge Season 14: The Inferno III

message: Where is it stated that it's good guys vs. bad asses? CaptainP 04:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Who the f**k dweleted the casting list for Inferno 3?74.195.3.11 00:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  CAST LIST
Talk:Edward Turner (motorcycle designer)

message: link to photograph of ET's blue plaque at 8, Phillip Walk,Peckham, London SE15 - feel free to use
http://www.flickr.com/photos/29549002@N07/4208635016/ 
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/29549002@N07/4208635016/][img]http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2803/4208635016_05d33ed4cf.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/29549002@N07/4208635016/]Edward Turner Blue Plaque[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/29549002@N07/]meriden.triumph[/url], on Flickr
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/29549002@N07/4208635016/" title="Edward Turner Blue Plaque by meriden.triumph, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2803/4208635016_05d33ed4cf.jpg" width="500" height="375" alt="Edward Turner Blue Plaque"></a>
213.123.135.235 (talk) 15:03, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A new book about the Gaffer's Gallop is the perfect citation for this publicity event. The book is: Travelling With Mr Turner by Nigel C Winter 2011 Panther Publishing . 213.123.135.235 (talk) 23:57, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triumph Terrier Gaffer's Gallop citation 
Talk:Tatoosh Wilderness

message: If you have a good picture of the tatoosh range (They are the mountains behind you when you are at Paradise looking at Mt. Rainier) please post it.
I built this page as stub to fix a red link on another minor article and got carried away, please feel free to expand it.  Jeepday 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bar Bender

message: It's called Bar Benders. :( --unsigned comment
No, it is not:
*bar-benders tvb -"bar bender" 536
*bar-bender tvb -"bar benders" 3570
Not just Google, but check the link to the official page.  I can also confirm that the opening titles use "Bar Bender". 74.122.28.226 00:57, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please use the character's English names (where they exist) to describe the character here on English Wikipedia. In this series, English names were used more frequently than Chinese names for many of the barrister characters. Please remember that. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 05:18, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Benjwong (talk) 04:07, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming of Characters of this series 

message: "Unscrupulous but ethical" is contradictory.  You cannot be "unscrupulous but ethical".  Unscrupulous means unethical.  Unless you mean legal of course. 116.14.251.97 (talk) 10:24, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradictory
Talk:List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Greater Manchester

message: Just a question - why is there a picture of a site pertaining to Marsden, West Yorkshire included on this article about Greater Manchester? Jza84 01:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry my mistake! I have put a new photo on the article which should be correct. Suicidalhamster 20:16, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem! Thanks for the new pic! -- Jza84 · (talk) 20:54, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marsden, Greater Manchester 

message: See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography#SSSIs - URLs need to be updated?. PamD 12:27, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Natural England links need updating
Talk:Pyramid (geometry)

message: We need to stop edit warring on the volume and surface area sections. Here are issues that need to be addressed:
* We need to find a reliable citations for these formula.
* Proofs and derivations are not really necessary unless they are concise and to-the-point. These should be replaced with a citation instead of cluttering the page.
* We should not post formulæ derived from our own calculations, based on parameters that are not general for all pyramids, or worse yet, based on assumptions that aren't always true.
—Tetracube (talk) 22:38, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volume and surface area formulæ 

message: Another poorly written article from Wikipedia. So there is someone, apparently more than one person, who believes a pyramid has a radius.  I am certainly no expert, but I believe this to be false.  If it is true it, it is certainly NOT something that is known broadly enough to be used without explanation.  Perhaps the authors meant the circle on which the vertices of the base lie?  If so, this would only be true for those with a regular base, right?
The article needs to clearly explicitly state when it referring to general prisms and when it is about square pyramids.  This should happen in every section.  Why is this not self-evident?71.31.149.105 (talk) 23:23, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: ==

message: Just wondering why a tetrahedron, and shapes with more than four sides on their base, are being classed as pyramids.--78.146.175.222 (talk) 12:45, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Mathematically, any shape with a polygonal base and plane faces sloping to a vertex is called a pyramid, but culturally nearly all pyramids have square bases (there might be rare exceptions somewhere?).  The article covers both usages.  Should this be clarified?  Dbfirs 21:35, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Since when was a tetrahedron a pyramid? 

message: I notice that the English plural simplexes has been changed to the "false Latin" simplices.  I'm not going to revert this because it is probably the case that some mathematicians use this etymologically dubious plural (simplex is not a Latin noun), and this is a mathematical article, but I question the claim in the edit summary that a false Latin plural is "more correct".  Dbfirs 07:32, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simplices, complices, duplices? 

message: Where it says "A triangle-based is more often called a tetrahedron." should it not say "A triangle-based pyramid is more often called a tetrahedron." David.daileyatsrudotedu (talk) 17:30, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, I added the word. Tom Ruen (talk) 06:21, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  typo in first section
Talk:USS Cavalla (SSN-684)

message: As a Cavalla crewmember I always understood that our ship was 10-20 feet longer than the previous boats in the class. But the Sturgeon page list the same length for Sturgeon as for Cavalla (292 feet). If anyone can shed some light on this and correct the article, that would be great. Svanslyck (talk) 22:52, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Long hull?
Talk:USS Guitarro (SSN-665)

message: I think the battery fire in the 80s is pretty notable.  Ship was considered in extremis and sever damage requiring a long upkeep was created.  I can't find a good unclass source for it though.  The stuff I googled all had the details wrong, so I don't want to link to them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.246.149.94 (talk) 17:06, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  battery fire
Talk:Middle College High School (Santa Ana)

message: Notified User:Manny!-Freakin-Fresh! of PROD--Dtwarren 04:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: PROD
Talk:USS Pintado (SSN-672)

message: I don't know whether this has due weight for a mention here, but I just ran across a couple of interesting tidbits on pages 49 and 55 of https://fas.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/NavalAccidents1945-1988.pdf. I happened to be looking at that while looking for something unrelated, and I have not read much of it. I thought I would mention it here in case of interest. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 19:15, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collisions with Soviet submarine and South Korean naval ship
Talk:USS Pogy (SSN-647)

message: This article claims the ship is named for a Lake Tahoe trout. As a former crewmember of USS Pogy and a long-time resident of northern California, I have never heard this nor have I ever heard anyone call a Tahoe trout a "pogy." Every source I have encountered over the last 25 years (including Wikipedia) says that pogy is another word for "menhaden," a fish found in the Atlantic and the Gulf of Mexico. There is no source given for the "trout" claim, and I am inclined to doubt its veracity. This claim should be documented or removed. Altgeld (talk) 15:45, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Dictionary of American Regional English (p.226) "Pogy" was a name given to several species of fish, including the Atlantic menhaden (Brevoortia tyrannus) and the Red porgy (Pagrus pagrus), but also to the Lahontan cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki henshawi) - once very common, but extinct in Lake Tahoe since 1930. dawkeye (talk) 01:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of Name 

message: Just random wikiing, wondered across this page, the Construction and commissioning needs a bit of rewording. Its first paragraph has the keel start date twice. 2001:569:BD50:5E00:2102:D7C1:95B7:FA8E (talk) 03:53, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some clean up needed
Talk:USS Tautog (SSN-639)

message: I've been having trouble finding where this information comes from. The sources only seem to list a fraction of the content provided here, though the source I just added does supplement the others well, it's not a source I trust that much myself as it doesn't seem to be where the original information is from. I assume this is from a book or similar? KristianLyngstol (talk) 01:06, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Just wanted to point out that a 2 degree bend in a sub's sail (the alleged result of the collision with K-108) would have created more problems than drydocking. Sails can cause snap roll during maneuvering, and such a bend may have thereby made controlling the sub more difficult. Some accounts state that the access trunk within the sail was flooded, and it is easy to think that periscopes and masts were damaged. Reconstruction of the sail was likely considerable, and a 2 degree bend would therefore be a reconstruction defect. Just sayin...Tfdavisatsnetnet (talk) 17:23, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bent sail
Talk:Fort Richmond Collegiate

message: I went to FRC.  
I think it opened briefly in 1966 for the spring.
Its first full year was 1967 as a kindergarten to grade 12 school
When Dalhousie Elementary opened it became a 7 to 12 school.  What year was that?
When Acadia Junior High opened it became a 10 to 12 school.  What year was that?
First principal was Mr. Burt Kroeker.  Do I have the spelling right?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.71.80.195 (talk) 22:56, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's add a history section 

message: Do we have any notable alumni yet? 
50.71.80.195 (talk) 03:32, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's add a notable alumni section.
Talk:Dancing Man

message: I see some clues that this is a photograph, others that it's a frame from a motion picture. Which is it? -- Hoary 04:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a motion picture still. I'll clarify in the article. -dmmaus 04:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! -- Hoary 05:15, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Where can the motion picture be found?  Is it on the Web?  And more pertaintly, can a copy be embedded into the article?  --Holdek (talk) 20:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I have removed the Australian documentary film category - this image is from a newsreel edition of Movietone News (Australia) - the man dancing represents about 8 seconds of footage in that newsreel. "Dancing man" is not the name of a documentary film so that category is misleading. Sterry2607 (talk) 07:07, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Still photo? Motion picture?

message: here and here (HUMAN STORIES - JED: The Dancing Guy)Civic Cat (talk) 19:27, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Dancing Man, meet Dancing Guy