Talk:The Day of Black Sun

message: Umm...   
Can we do this?    
I mean, the picture we put on the article is a screenshot from an "illegal" episode, so how're we going to justify that, but not put the plot synopsis? Just thought it needed mentioning. Pejmany (talk) 00:30, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Display Picture 

message: The constant moving and redirects is really getting out of hand. How about we just use the name they present on the episode's title card when the episode airs? Being the direct source it will trump every other source we have. Any other thoughts? Ub3rn008 (talk) 08:58, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Or look at the online video or the title card in the info box there and get it now.--Cody6 (talk) 12:40, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title Woes 

message: I've fixed these, this is two epsiodes. That fact has been confirmed by Nickelodeon, so there's no need to wait for the epsiodes to air.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 22:43, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that ruling has been revoked, DoBS is two chapters, with Western Airtemple being Chapter 12 Rau J16 21:57, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ep/Prod number 

message: it's dec 1 already. could we make the plot now?
:Absoultly. Its aired somewhere in the world, so anyone removing things because their spoilers or whatever is wrong, plain and simple.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 23:18, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  could we make the plot now? 

message: This has got to be one of the worst wikipedia articles about a TV show I have ever seen. It is full of usless information like "Sokka sighs" and "Toph says: sweet". This isn't a description of the plot, it seems like the script for the episode.
:Well, then fix it!  The text is only a few hours old--sometimes it takes a little longer than that to get something nice and polished. AndperseAndy 04:50, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this page is horrible, i am going to be spending a late night on this article, i can tell you that. Also please sign your comments with "~~~~" Rau J16 01:28, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've rewritten the plot summary, but i still feel it needs a lot of work. Rau J16 07:19, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I completely agree.  I've taken the liberty of rewriting some of Part 2.  However, most of my changes are just re-wordings of what was previously there.  What we really need to do is remove unnecessary details and interpretations.  For example, some contributors seem to believe Zuko was either "smiling" or "looked determined" at the episode's closing; I, however, can detect no such expressions.  Thus, the information is too subjective to include in the article.  Unfortunately, it is currently final exams week for me, so I'll be offline for the next couple days.  b.y.w (talk) 21:34, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, i saw your edits, and appreciate some constructive edits to the page, good luck with your exams(mine aren't till X-Mas). Rau J16 23:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Did a lot of rewording, and brought the plot down to wikipedia standards(400-700 words), but thats per section, not total. if you can find a way to get it down that far, then be my guest, i will praise you highly if you can. Rau J16 09:29, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overwritten 

message: This page seems to be under heavy edits by IP addresses, which rarely contribute anything worth while to the article. I request that this page be placed under semi-protection, does anyone else agree? Rau J16 01:24, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I edited under an IP for a long, time, and have only recently joined wikipedia, and while I do agree that IPs do contribute useless things, many are actually trying to help and many do write things of worth. And even if they don't, as long as they weren't deliberately trying to be stupid or harm the article, they were just being bold. I feel that we should include the IP editors as they have the same capacity of registered editors to contribute positive things. And remember that YOU as well can edit the article if you feel that another edit is not up to wikipedia standards. So unless we have people continually harming the article, then perhaps the page could be semi'd. Ub3rn008 06:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: while you bring up a good point, this page IS under heavy edits by ip's who do not check edit histories, or the talk pages to see if an issue is being discussed. Most of these edits are reverted because they are (A)previously removed, (B) not sourced, or (C) unneeded, or vandalism. Rau J16 11:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection 

message: Shouldn't we at least have the picture of Ozai striking Zuko? That is the moment that defines the episode.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.222.104.142 (talk) 21:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We dont need pictures. Rau J16 23:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's ridiculous. Every other episode has images, there's no reason for this one not to.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 18:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't mean we need them, i mean im all for them, but we do not NEED them. plus, if you guys need an image, i can get it, just tell me the scene you want, but because i'm not good at 'fair-use' you will have to do it. Rau J16 23:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The only one I want (as original poster) is when Ozai strikes Zuko with lightning. That would be fine, and perhaps down the page some, put Aang kissing Katara, but Im fairly neutral on that photo.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.227.0.197 (talk) 21:57, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Like i said earlier, i can get the actual image, but i cannot do the 'Fair-Use' part, so, if you can, or know some one who can let me know and ill up some images. Rau J16 11:37, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

text:  Put the picture on the page, i'll do the fair use stuff--Tosta mista (talk) 18:37, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'd wait on that. Look at the project page and you'dd see that the season 1 articles are in the process of being merged. That means the pictures will have to be removed cause we can't have an image for each episode. The Placebo Effect (talk) 19:38, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, O.K., i'll wait. Rau J16 22:32, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures? 

message: The "Guest Stars" section is getting too long, i am going to add a cast box below the plot. Rau J16 22:45, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Please edit it as you see fit. Rau J16 00:00, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast Box 

message: :Image:Avatar the invasion titlecard.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use rationale for Image:Avatar the invasion titlecard.png