lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Salvelinus

message: There appear to be 15 or 20 sp. and ssp. in Siberia, East Asia, etc. with no articles.  Probably there are experts in Russia etc. who could write the articles but aren't so comfortable with Wiki conventions.  There must be an opportunity for international collaboration here. 76.80.26.121 17:45, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eurasian and East Asian Salvelinus 

message: This should only be done by experts. The orthography of taxon authors follows specific rules different from normal writing; specifically, parentheses are mandatory iun some dcases and prohibited in others. Whoever added the authors here apparently made parentheses around every citation. This is wrong and needs to be fixed. 
If a taxon has its own article, its taxonomic author shoud never be given in a list on genus or similar pages, or in the text; if the genus (etc) page gives an author, it should be deleted there and moved to the species page. The taxobox is the proper place for it; everything else leads to errors (such as people giving the author name as part of the taxon name, which is wrong) Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 10:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: =Adding authors to taxon lists
Talk:Coregonus lavaretus

message: I would like to propose merging Houting into Coregonus lavaretus. A recent BMC Ecology paper has found that Houting are genetically indistinguishable from the European Whitefish; as a result, we now have two articles referring to the same species of fish. The information pertaining to the Houting and it's controversial status would better be suited as a section in the Whitefish article. Pax Brittanica (talk) 22:44, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Robertjamal12 ~🔔 17:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:The Bean Trees

message: This is currently required reading in the NYS reading for normal HS grade10 english.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imrich9797 (talk • contribs) 15:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NewYork required reading book for Sophomore year in HighSchool. 

message: The plot section is more like advertising than a plot summary. The listed characters are not mentioned, and the action of the plot is not described. - - Prairieplant (talk) 00:23, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary is way too short
Talk:Upper Hutt

message: I think that it would be good to include the Upper Hutt Coat-of-Arms and Flag in at least the basic info box, similar to what has been done on the Wellington page.
There are images available online for the both the Coat of Arms and flag at e.g. Heraldry wiki, Flags of the World and the Upper Hutt City Council website, but I don't have the copyright or permission to upload them.
Cheers--Radicuil (talk) 13:01, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just added an image of the coat of arms --Radicuil (talk) 10:11, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upper Hutt Coat-of-Arms and Flag
Talk:Parker-Hale

message: Parker Hale do still make guns - I just bought a new Paker Hale Striker air rifle. I know they make 3 air rifles - the Striker, the Phoenix and the Phoenix mkII. Not sure about other guns though.
Is the firm's name "Parker Hale" or "Parker-Hale"? I've seen it spelt and used both ways in various reference texts. --Commander Zulu 11:07, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Older catalogues seem to have Parker-Hale predominantly, e.g. this one from 1945 and this one from 1933. The modern logo fudges things by having a dot rather than a hyphen in between Parker and Hale. I would vote for Parker-Hale if it came to that. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 10:42, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I have tried to gather some information on the Parker Hale military 303 conversions , but not a lot out there. These were sporting 303s made from No.1 Mk3 and No4 Mk1 ex military SMLEs. Fitted with a new sporter barrel about 21 1/2" long , a new "Monte Carlo" style 2 piece stock and some had a flush fitting 5 round magazine. It's easy to dismiss these as just another sporterised 303 , but being well priced , accurate and well made they were well received. From the 1950's to the 1970's many were sold and did good service in this part of the world.(New Zealand)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.155.72.69 (talk) 02:07, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  303 conversions
Talk:Norse

message: Just removed 'Nordic countries' from the disambiguation list. The 'Nordic' in 'Nordic countries' is not from 'Norse' but from French 'nordique' or simply 'northern'. The term 'Nordic countries' has fairly recently been introduced to the English language (via French) and meant as an equivalent to 'pays nordiques' or 'de nordiska länderna' (Scandinavian languages) or 'pohjoismaat' (Finnish).  Clarifer 14:59, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Nordic countries]] vs. Norse

message: Where does the word come from. It's not a Scandinavian word as far i know. When and where was the word first used? --Comanche cph 18:30, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The word Norse 

message: Why is Finland not a Norse country and why isn't Finnish a Scandinavian language? I really know nothing about the distinction, and can't readily find any info on Wikipedia. Softlavender (talk) 11:26, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Finns aren't a Germanic people and Finnish isn't a Germanic language. I'm a little bit confused myself about who is and isn't a Finn. Gringo300 (talk) 20:24, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Finland

message: Hi 2601:601:8000:3120:6547:4B6B:17FE:FE2B (talk) 12:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi
Talk:Royal Defence Corps

message: The RDC were actually full time soldiers, although not front line troops. The Home Guard were unpaid and did duties in their spare time; surely the World War I equivalent would have been the Volunteer Training Corps (World War I)? Alansplodge (talk) 23:03, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! I may try to find some info about the Home Service Battalions in WWII. Alansplodge (talk) 11:04, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  A reliable source for this would be the Spectator archive so the date of foundation would have to be changed into 1916. http://archive.spectator.co.uk/article/25th-march-1916/3/last-saturday-an-army-order-was-issued-stating-tha --M.Buelles (talk) 16:06, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same role as Home Guard?
Talk:Toyota Starlet

message: I just found this site today: 
It seems to list some very obscure Toyotas, including EP82 and EP91 Starlet saloons. Did these ever even go into production? The pictures do look like photoshop jobs though. --Zilog Jones 15:02, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Starlet saloons?

message: Re: merging Toyota Starlet GT Turbo into Toyota Starlet#P80
* support. Both articles are not particularly big, so merging the turbo model into the Starlet article makes sense. The turbo article should then be redirected to the new section in the Starlet article. Same for the Toyota Starlet Glanza.  Stepho  (talk) 04:55, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from Toyota Starlet GT Turbo 

message: Does anybody know if Indonesian production ended in March 1997 or March 1998 ? The article gives both dates but no reliable references.  Stepho  talk  01:29, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  80 series end date 

message: The unattributed statement that Starlets are "normally... dependable but dull... but there were exceptions" seems to be an editor's personal opinion and a blatant violation of the central Wikipedia tenet of neutral point of view. This statement needs to be attributed to an outside writer or it needs to be removed to maintain NPOV. Carguychris (talk) 19:24, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: That statement can be said of almost every Toyota vehicle - rock solid reliable but hardly exciting. But you are quite right, without a supporting reference then it can be deleted.  Stepho  talk  20:52, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Dependable but dull... but there are exceptions?

message: Hello IP from Reading, UK. Please read WP:SUBCAT and discuss before reverting any more. :Category:1970s cars is not needed because :Category:Cars introduced in 1973 is already contained within that parent category. As for "body type" or "bodytype", both styles are perfectly fine. When both are accepted variants, we do not change them back and forth because it is a huge waste of time. Just accept that there are regional variations and whatever style the article was first written in generally overrides. See WP:ENGVAR. Thanks for your time and for being such a pleasant person to deal with.  Mr.choppers | ✎  03:23, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorization
Talk:De La Salle College Waterford

message: Main priority is an info box and gathering references to defend claims. Alumni list is useful. Photo gallery would be a nice addition. Vandalism is a minor issue. Victuallers 15:11, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Schools Assessment
Talk:Anzac Parade, Canberra

message: :Image:Canberra_parlimentary_axis_2.JPG is located at the commons. From what I can gather, it currently isn't being used anywhere, and would make a good addition to this page it it can be squeezed in somewhere. -- Adz|talk 14:57, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:ANZAC which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 16:31, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 08:30, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style 

message: Regarding recent disagreement about the photo, I've asked at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Canberra#Photo of ANZAC Parade for 
opinions as to which photo should be used. Mitch Ames (talk) 07:39, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Talk:Native Title Act 1993

message: I propose that Native Title Amendment Act 1998 be merged into Native Title Act 1993. The Native Title Act has been further substantially amended in 2007 and 2009. I think that keeping all of the content in the one article will make the current & historical situation understandable it is then simply a matter of including sections for the two subsequent amendments, clearly identifying the particular intent of each change.. I don't expect it to be controversial but thought I would check first. Find bruce (talk) 04:13, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It needs to be noted that original Native Title Act was a negotiated position between a group of Indigenous people and the Keating government. The subsequent amendments to the Act were mean spirited impositions with the purpose of watering down Indigenous people rights so that multinational corporations can have greater access to ancient sacred lands that the High Court of Australia recognised Indigenous people had prior and continuous right to claim as their own. [Sections for the two subsequent amendments need to] clearly identifying the particular intent of each change.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.139.125.85 (talk) 04:57, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Didn't Brian Harradine only agree to 8 of the 10 points? Rocksong 02:59, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 8 point plan?
Talk:Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1976

message: I'm a little confused. The article refers to  "The Act, the first of the Aboriginal Land Rights Acts,", yet there are various land rights acts in other states which pre-date this legislation in the linked article. Is this sentence trying to say something different to what it does?WotherspoonSmith (talk) 12:39, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  the first of the land rights acts? 
Talk:Central Australia

message: Just a minor issue with respect to the map.  The Australian Capital Territory was known as the Federal Capital Territory until its name was changed in 1938.  There was also the Jervis Bay Territory (from 1915) which was actually part of the FCT.  If the map is to represent the period fo 1926-31, then the ACT should be labeled as the FCT.  Also, the division did not occur until 1927.  Alan Davidson 00:50, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:Urban culture

message: This term is vauge-- I wonder if it should even be defined? futurebird 15:09, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vague

message: This entire article give no mention of the fact that both this term and the use of it by either noteworthy persons or the general populace are very much localized to North America; apparently it has spread to Canada by diffusion and presumably this is also possible in other countries that broadcast a lot of U.S. media such as the U.K or Australia
Not only does the wording imply that this is something that exists in every country all over the world despite lacking any examples outside North America, it doesn't even offer speculation or explanation as to why it would or should be considered a global phenomenon. 202.89.189.7 (talk) 08:01, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I did a Bing search for "urban lifestyle" and this came up. This might be the worst Wikipedia article in terms of the disconnect between the term, the article's lede, and the supporting material. D. F. Schmidt (talk) 15:07, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Americentrism

message: — Assignment last updated by CJS77 (talk) 01:38, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Contemporary Black Popular Culture
Talk:Nhulunbuy

message: This area in Northeast Arnhem Land has belonged to Yolngu Aboriginal people for over 40,000 years. I don't think this is NPOV. In pre-colonial Australia, land wasn't something that could be owned. I think 'has been occupied by ' is more correct, or better still the passive voice could be eliminated altogether. Grassynoel (talk) 08:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. I've changed to "home to" though I'm sure this could be improved upon.  This article, like the one on Arnhem Land, has enormous potential. Needs plenty of work on verification though! I'll do what I can in the next week or so--Glen Dillon (talk) 16:36, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

text: one more thing...you're right about passive voice, and of course my tiny edit didn't fix that problem.  I think that "occupied by" would certainly have been an improvement upon "ownership" but it still has a euro-centric ring to it - in the sense of occupation = possession/rights/entitlement, which is at odds with the entire "relationship with country" thing that the traditional owners have going with their land.--Glen Dillon (talk) 16:43, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Belonged to"

message: "-"?
WisDom-UK (talk) 21:22, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation needed
Talk:Subiaco Oval

message: In AFL circles, Subiaco Oval is considered to be the longest ground in the competition, with visiting interstate teams often having to adjust their playing style accordingly.Surely this can be an established fact?  Either there is a longer ground or there isn't.  Can someone who knows where to look do a quick bit of research & amend accordingly. Megamanic 09:05, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think (don't remember exactly) I was the one that put that statement in. Whenever there is football commentary (TV, radio, print etc.) the lenght/"expanse" of Subiaco Oval often gets a mention so it more a case of assumed knowledge. But if you would like some statistical stuff, here it is  also - note: Marrara and Aurora are seldomly used. - Htra0497 10:46, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Length of Ground

message: I have a farly good quality photo of the ANZ stand... should I upload it?
- Tarkyn 24 14:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: The stadium may have been demolished, but the oval hasn’t. Subiaco Oval is the playing surface, and the stadium is the structure that used to exist around the playing surface. Now we have just the oval again. Are there any objections to phrasing it like that in the article? Betterkeks (talk) 03:28, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Oval" and the "Stadium" are not the same thing
Talk:Hooverphonic

message: They contributed "Shake the Disease", though their version lacked the vulnerable "understand me" refrain sung by songwriter Martin L. Gore. 
*thanks, Sunil 131.111.36.48 18:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Depeche Mode tribute: For the Masses (1998) 

message: I don't mean to start a controversy here, but wouldn't it be more logical if the introduction read "a Belgian band" instead of (currently) "a Flemish band". More information can be given inside the article, but I feel the introduction should say "Belgian". Any objection? 80.236.203.214 23:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Belgian band? 

message: Some references for future edits:
Noemi leaving hooverphonic: https://www.facebook.com/Hooverphonic/posts/1101000316582614  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roman3 (talk • contribs) 09:06, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Im 99.9% sure that she was kicked through a zoom call from the band so they can make geike retun to the band. I don't think she left it by her own. Prodioctive (talk) 18:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luka's leaving
Talk:Roma Street railway station

message: Should this page be merged with the Roma Street Busway Station page, as Roma Street Station? Rods42 (talk) 11:58, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Busway 

message: Will someone please edit the main page to include the fact NO photography is allowed at roma st railway station due to the fact it's a security risk please. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.187.57.69 (talk • contribs) 14:16, 20 September 2006.
:Sure, if you can provide a source for that information. FiggyBee 22:59, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Security risk 

message: I have found that the reason for the CitytrainBrisbane/Navigation template breaking is because, it seems, 'too much' is included in the page with collapsible templates.  Viewing the source of the article, this message is commented-out as a hint as to what is going wrong:
:WARNING: template omitted, pre-expand include size too large
Removing all the TL Route Display Table stuff in a preview fixes the problem.  Will a Roma Street railway station, Brisbane (bus routes) page be needed again?  <B>S<SPAN STYLE="font-size:87%">EO75</SPAN></B> [talk] 06:54, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Innocently browsing the page today, it appears that something behind-the-scenes must have changed as this problem is no longer.  <B>S<SPAN STYLE="font-size:87%">EO75</SPAN></B> [talk] 04:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CitytrainBrisbane/Navigation template breaking 
Talk:Charles Chetwynd-Talbot, 20th Earl of Shrewsbury

message: I disagree with him being categorised as one of the 'French founders of automobile manufacturers' in connection with the Talbot-Clemente company, as he was not a French citizen nor ethnically French. He was rather a British (English) founder of an Anglo-French company. I will therefore delete him from the category.Cloptonson (talk) 12:05, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect category
Talk:Hollis Upper Elementary School

message: It's a public elementary school with no remarkable features. If none can be esablished, it should be nominated for deletion after a reasonable time. --UlTiMuS - ( T | C ) 15:27, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for bringing this to my attention, I'll avoid articles like this from now on. - Hollis1138 15:30, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been over 7 years and nobody has found notability. It's been 4 years and nobody has even added an independent reference at all. I'm redirecting to the "education" section of the jurisdiction (see WP:WPSCHOOLS/AG#N). DMacks (talk) 20:43, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Black Saturday (professional wrestling)

message: Seriously -- how is this worthy of its own entry? Shouldn't it be a portion of the TBS entry or part of the various pages of the promotions concerned? 50.129.69.1 (talk) 00:17, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this really worthy of its own entry?
Talk:Battle of Chavez Ravine

message: Regarding the initial version of this article: I originally wrote this on Everything2.com so I have no problem plagiarizing myself.
Quartermaster 15:33, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarizing myself 

message: Though referred to as "The Battle of . . ." I don't think this falls into any category of military history whatsoever.
:It doesn't, and I have removed the military history tag. --Laserbeamcrossfire 04:58, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool. I figured someone would get around to it once it was pointed out. Perfectly understandable how something called "The Battle of Chavez Ravine" would be initially classified under military history. Once again, Wikipedia self-corrects. Bravo! --Quartermaster 13:22, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Military History 

message: Doger stadium anti-Catholic history.  Began when they forcefully evicted Hispanic Catholics in taking the land and countinues with inviting Anti-Catholic groups to the Stadium 2603:9001:390A:B6D6:7D14:93B8:BCB6:B556 (talk) 14:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doger stadium anti-Catholic history.  Began when they forcefully evicted Hispanic Catholics in taking the land and countinues with inviting Anti-Catholic groups to the Stadium
Talk:KVAT-LD

message: As far as I can tell, there's Jimmy Swaggart on 17.3 and color bars on 17.2 and 17.4, for several weeks now... AnonMoos (talk) 22:20, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: subchannels
Talk:Aerogard

message: I remember a Max Walker ad, where he was being questioned by a young boy (clearly an adoring fan) if the "crowds" bothered him, and being told they didn't, it was the flies that did ("Mr Walker" used aeroard to ward them off of course) with the boy saying "I use it too Mr Walker" and ending by wishing "Mr Walker" to "aveagoodweekend".  I don't remember a John Newcombe commercial for aerogard - there might have been one before my time, but I wonder if the writer has mistaken Max Walker for John Newcombe since they both have brown wavy hair and big moustaches!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.177.218.51 (talk) 05:50, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotion 
Talk:John Newcombe

message: During his career Newcombe's extravagant moustache was as well known as he was- possibly more.Saxophobia 00:18, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moustache 

message: There appears to be a lack of focus on te total GS tournament wins (includes 2 x Mixed Doubles) making Newcombe in the highest echelon of all time GS tournament wins for men. Antipodenz (talk) 07:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total Grand Slam tournament wins 

message: He is listed as having won 4 GS titles, when he actually won 7. It's all wrong down there. 138.99.112.3 (talk) 17:43, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Career Statistics
Talk:Raffelstetten customs regulations

message: "Raffelstetten" redirects to "Asten" (a town in the Netherlands) at the German wiki. 
I couldn't figure out what a Toll-Bar is. --Fang Aili talk 15:42, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: I was redirected to this page from Trade route from the Khazars to the Germans on Kievan Rus.  This page doesn't really fit that context very well: who are the Khazars, what was the trade route about, etc?  Bhudson (talk) 18:52, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: redirection

message: See also :cs:Raffelstettenský celní řád. --Methodios (talk) 18:01, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raffelstettenský celní řád
Talk:Ivy Meeropol

message: Of all the film clips shown in this documentary, the Rosenbergs showed no emotion whatsoever. They were as cold as spies who came in from the cold to the very end.
Not sure whether this one requires better tone or cleanup or what, but the second two sections read very confusingly to me. Eve Adams 22:49, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled