Talk:Ford Falcon (AU)

message: This article is fully edited and unless vandalised, it does not need any editing. ThanksHarrison-HB4026 02:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fully edited article

message: An assessment by the automobile group of this article (I have substantially edited so therefore would prefer not to grade) would be most appreciated.--VS talk 11:02, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Automobiles

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: The new prototypes ection is just plain wrong, those aren't Prototypes, they are concept cars or, if they make it into production, SVPs. Greglocock (talk) 23:43, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello there. Well, I had a similar thought, especially about the non-Ford ones. Will at least change the heading to "Concept cars" as you say but feel free to tweak further or wait to see other comments. CtrlXctrlV (talk) 01:28, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prototypes 

message: Pretty sure the car shown at sydney in 2000 was rwd, the citation given does not mention awd. Greglocock (talk) 00:04, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Incidentally the edit summary was wrong, the bonnet height needed to be raised for 4wd (not AWD, wasn't available then even as a proto) at the time, not the ground clearance. Greglocock (talk) 00:22, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  R5 - AWD? 

message: I've raiesd this at project automobiles-few recalls are notable. I see nobody has bothered to try and establish notability depsite it being flagged for a while. Greglocock (talk) 11:36, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know where is the best place to respond but I am reading Notability and it talks about stand-alone articles. Indeed, it reads "The criteria applied to article creation/retention are not the same as those applied to article content. The notability guidelines do not apply to article or list content (with the exception that some lists restrict inclusion to notable items or people)." The information added is verifiable, reliable and relevant to the subject. I note you took up issue with other valid content previously CtrlXctrlV (talk) 12:01, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  recalls-failure to establish notability 

message: Substituted at 21:42, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Ford Falcon (AU). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120708014108/http://autoweb.com.au/A_50679/cms/newsarticle.html to http://autoweb.com.au/A_50679/cms/newsarticle.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160118231003/http://www.autoweb.com.au/cms/A_50666/title_The-AU-Falcon-A-New-Edge-to-an-Australian-Icon-Advances-at-a-Glance/newsarticle.html to http://www.autoweb.com.au/cms/A_50666/title_The-AU-Falcon-A-New-Edge-to-an-Australian-Icon-Advances-at-a-Glance/newsarticle.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120328114342/http://www.autoweb.com.au/cms/A_51483/title_Ford-Tickford-Experience-set-for-Launch-in-October/newsarticle.html to http://www.autoweb.com.au/cms/A_51483/title_Ford-Tickford-Experience-set-for-Launch-in-October/newsarticle.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:53, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Can we please put a 30 Day lock on the page? YouTuber “HubNut” has directed his fans here & some are vandalising. Thanks. Ukeditor3939 (talk) 13:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  30 Day Lock