lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of West Virginia University alumni

message: There is already a page under this name, the page Notable alumni of wvu is a duplicate and should be merged and then deleted. Quidam65 17:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I've removed most of the entries that were redlinks and didn't seem to indicate notability. I tried to do this with a light hand (e.g. I left in CEOs of notable companies), but I may have removed some that should have stayed. If anyone notices any, feel free to replace them.
Should we perhaps decide that only persons with articles (or major sections in articles) should be included? It doesn't seem too high a bar, although I am conscious of that a page like this could encourage the writing of articles on people who might be missed otherwise. Your thoughts? --Sopoforic 23:17, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just removed redlinks again.  In addition, there needs to be a reliable source for every item on this page.  Corvus cornixtalk 02:57, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redlinks

message: I suggest that "List of" be deleted from the title. I think the average bear can discern that it's a list. Also, Jim Braxton used to be included among the notable athletes. He was a star running back for WVU around 1970, played alongside O.J. for the Bills, and was regularly credited by O.J. as being a running back who unselfishly limited his own carries and provided blocking that helped O.J. set his yardage records. --NameThatWorks (talk) 22:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested Changes
Talk:MUVE

message: I propose that MOOC be merged into MUVE. I think that the content in the MOOC article is promoting the works of George Siemens and Stephen Downes above what could be considered WP:NPOV. The basic aspects of a MOOC can easily be explained in the context of MUVEs and in particular MUVLEs, and the MUVE article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of MOOC will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. VCHunter (talk) 18:09, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Imperivm: Great Battles of Rome

message: Is that "v" deliberate or a typo? 2fort5r (talk) 18:10, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's deliberate. You can see it uses a "V" in the cover image present in the main article, and both previous titles in the franchise used a "V" as well. --Lashiec (talk) 19:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Akyaka, Kars

message: the icon placed on [ 37 03 17 N - 28 19 36 E ]is AKKAYA the town in  MUGLA, not in KARS
88.240.75.207 22:25, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Political game

message: This list of games really belongs in the Open Directory Project instead of here. The notability of these games hasn't been established. SharkD (talk) 02:17, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The list of games certainly needs to go, ones with articles should be in cats, the sea of external links is linkspam to many games which probably won't pass notability.Someone another (talk) 02:54, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I did have a look at sources for political games, there are a few cases of games specifically called that, but certainly nothing like the amount which would be needed to create a full article outside of government simulation games. Most of the sources actually labelled political games as video games which had the purpose or expectation of political influence over players. If this intention has not been covered elsewhere in WP, there may be a viable article on that subject, but this isn't it. Here's some source examples Washington Post, The Guardian online and GameSpot. Someone another (talk) 03:53, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List of games
Talk:Philosophy of engineering

message: Article substantially cut+paste from . Not ? Ttiotsw 17:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The fine line between a quote and [[WP:copyvio]] ? 

message: I've started to rework the article both to expand it and to bring it more into line with the other 'philosophy of...' articles.   I'd like to put in a few sub-headings to deal with things like aspects of ethics (company loyalty versus public responsibility?), aesthetics (can I make the nuclear power station pretty?), and so on.   However, this willl take time and effort and before going ahead, perhaps we should discuss what this structure should be.RDT2 (talk) 14:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikification

message: This is far too long and looks like a 'suggested reading' list for Philosophy of Engineering 1.   Can we pare it down to key publications only?RDT2 (talk) 20:03, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Publications list
Talk:Technology demonstration

message: The statement about faked tech demos earning the title "bullshot" I find not so accurate, as it was created in a strip of Penny-Arcade as a joke, and the term is not widely used in the least. 60.240.2.203 11:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bullshot? 

message: -I notice that Gmaxwell has been removing the video game related content, and while it's true that video-game-related and other graphical tech demos do not comprise the entirity of tech demos, they do probably comprise one of the largest and most well-known segments of the plethora of types of tech demo. So, perhaps instead of deleting the video-game and graphics-card tech demo content, you could possibly just add other information about other types of tech demos, such as for other applications (ala a new app, operating system, or interface type [see "bumptop"]) which would not only make the article more complete, and everyone more happy, but would extend the article past the current handful of sentences you've edited it down to. Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.94.120.100 (talk) 21:15, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video Game Bias 

message: Title is inconsistent in style -- either it should be tech demo since that is the common phrase applied to it, or it should be technology demonstration if you want to be formal. Going halfway is awkward. Ham Pastrami (talk) 09:14, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: Term not used in article. 86.179.191.90 (talk) 00:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "pnambic" redirect here?
Talk:Kabir panth

message: A lot of this article is written from a Kabirist (Don't know the proper term.) POV. ALso, according to this article he lived to be 120 years old?! Zazaban 17:16, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Which capitalization is correct? If "Kabir Panth" is correct, we'll have to get an admin to move the page. Kabir Panth is a redirect to Kabir panth.—C45207 | Talk 08:54, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I feel the redirection was not necessary. --Tito Dutta (Talk) 07:42, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Kabir panth" or "Kabir Panth"? 

message: I have added an image in the article. I was more interested in [[wp:infobox|infobox}]. Someone please go for it. --Tito Dutta (Talk) 07:43, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added An Image 

message: The external inks section should be revised. --Tito Dutta (Talk) 07:56, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links Section Should Be Revised 

message: First off, agree with Titodutta that there are too many ELs; which are the most authoritative?
Further, today I removed large chunks of the article as failing WP:N and WP:V. If you have objections, it would be best to bring them up here before restoring. Note that blogspots, sectarian or fan-sites, etc. are generally not WP:Reliable sources and are not admissible as footnotes. MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:36, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Major deletions September 2011
Talk:Louis Dega

message: I have just finished reading the book, Papillon and it has led me to notice an error in the description of Louis Degas death. The book describes Henri Charriere "making a break" in 1941 with a man named Sylvain, who is said to have died in quicksand but a few tens of feet from papillon only moments after landing ashore.
Correct, so I deleted "He died in quicksand while trying to escape with Charriere in 1941." There is no mention of what happened to Dega in Charriere's novel. --144.132.108.118 04:36, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Louis Dega dying in quicksand?? 

message: According to this article, "The two became best friends during their sentence," when in fact they seemed to be quite good friends before they were imprisoned. The movie differs from the book in this regard. Arundhati lejeune 09:52, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Error 

message: Henri Charrière (a.k.a. "Papillon") was doubtless a felon, a murderer, a scoundrel and a liar. It has been sufficiently demonstrated that his successful novel "Papillon" was a fictional account, based mostly on other fellow inmates' experiences, so it is wrong (or highly debatable at best) that his book is still called "an  autobiography" -- I'm moving the article Papillon (autobiography) to Papillon (novel). --AVM (talk) 19:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Papillon's "autobiography"? 

message: 1925 1926
L'AFFAIRE DES FAUX BONS 
DE LA DEFENSE 
Le courtier arrêtéà Metz,est un reprh de jus. 
ticepariaim quidéserh pendent la guerre 
Commeles enquêteurs l'avaient 
supposé, le faussaire arrêtéà Metz,
avec sonamie MarceLle Jaccard,ne 
senomme pasplus Crombinque 
Nadot, Duerosou Langlois.
..............................................
Le pseudo-Crombin est en réalité 
un repris de justice,Fernand Royers,
néà Paris,Je 3 décembre 1881.
Condamnédeux foispour volà la.
rationde guerre,purgeait, ara'ften-
trale de Poissy, une condamnation à
dix-huitmois deprison.
http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k606260j.texte  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.250.65.123 (talk) 13:58, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Does anybody know the point being made here? Swanny18 (talk) 23:46, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Is Louis DEGA his real name ? 

message: Louis Dega's death was changed from "unknown" to "1945" on May 25th 2015‎ by a person with IP adress '104.156.240.140'.  It was one of only six minor edits made by this person... and they offered no comment or reasoning or citation for how they came by that date.  
I can find no information online concerning Dega's manner or date of death.  As a result, I've changed the date of death back to the original "unknown".  If anyone has any solid sources... or even not so solid sources... anything really... please feel free to mention it.  
Bzzzing (talk) 20:09, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death
Talk:Lyons, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 09:21, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Persistent uniform resource locator

message: The article talks about "PURL concept", but does not give a definite location or reference document for it. The status of the purl concept is not given in the first section, but it is said to be replaced by W3ID. 
Please add a reference defining document and provide information on the concepts status (working draft, widely published and used, to be replaced, whatever).
Thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.64.228.99 (talk) 12:13, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Where's the concept or spec for PURL?

message: Apologies if I do this wrong but:
The first reference links to a purl that (ironically) seems to be dead. 2.106.120.138 (talk) 09:23, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Irony?

message: What's the basis for saying "PURLs are an interim measure ... Existing official PURLs (on Purl.Org) will probably be mapped to a URN namespace at a later date."? I'm an interested party, so I'm not editing the page directly... though I wonder if it's OK for me to at least add a "citation needed" mark. By the way, for a citeable argument to the contrary, see Untangle URIs, URLs, and URNs: Naming and the problem of persistence by yours truely 21 Jun 2005 DanConnolly (talk) 19:23, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interim Measure? 

message: I'm planning on adding content regarding Personalized Uniform Resource Locators. Should this be a separate page, or connected as a subheading to this one? I currently have 3 sources and enough info for a generous stub. If this is added as a separate page, I recommend a disambiguation page be added.
Jadeddissonance (talk) 04:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would recommend you add it to this one--70.251.178.130 (talk) 14:04, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

text: I disagree; Personalized URLs are very different from Persistent URLs.  If an article on Personalized URLs is ever added, it should be disambiguated. Prototypo (talk) 15:06, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation Page // Personalized URLs 

message: Readers of this page may be interested in thw following discussion:
* Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing#DOCTYPE Puzzle
--Guy Macon (talk) 22:37, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  DOCTYPE Puzzle
Talk:List of artificial pet games

message: digital pet and pet-raising simulation talk about a lot of the same stuff... i see two approaches... one is a merge... the other is to distinguish the two, with pet-raising simulations talking about PC and console games, while digital pets talk about other toys or research... either way, these articles are too close to just carry on the way things are going... comments? Lifeisrill (talk) 00:28, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well the two topics are definitely similar, but probably different enough to have their own articles. But as it stands right now, I would merge the "Pet-raising simulation" into "Digital pet". The simulation one is so short it doesn't really provide enough to distinguish itself from the digital one. However, if down the road the sim section gets too large, it can always be split back into its own separate article. My two cents. (Guyinblack25 talk 14:27, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree with merging pet sim into digital pet.  They both use Petz and Tamagotchi as poster children, further demonstrating their similarities.  Moreover, pet simulation seems like a list without info justifies it to be distinct from digital pet.  Digital pet could have a subsection for pet simulations it seems important. Ost (talk) 15:30, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

text: I think this article should be merged to digital pet, because pet-raising as a gameplay genre is exactly that. To qualify this, however, I want to note that pet-raising can also be a theme, such as in Pokemon (whose genre is actually RPG). However, the list of digital pet video games could be preserved, i.e. move this article to List of digital pet video games and then change the redirect to point back at digital pet. Then add a see also link to the digital pet article to point at the list. That's how I would do it, anyway. Ham Pastrami (talk) 08:43, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: I don't see how Neopets is any different in its category than subeta or mweor.  For all you need to go online to play.  Neopets has reached out and has mobile things for cell phones, but the main part of it is online.  I think it should be under browser games.
Frisbii (talk) 10:54, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Neopets as a PC Game/Computer?

message: I propose these lists are tabularised to indicate the developing company, release date, platform etc. Browser-based games are fundamentally different from other mediums and may additionally have a website and revenue model indicated. I have begun by tabularising browser-based games. Dremagon (talk) 21:00, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tabularisation of lists 

message: Unless I missed something, I don't think Howrse is on here...howrse is a game about breeding horses. 24.179.27.28 (talk) 14:47, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Howrse
Talk:Alias (command)

message: Smitty the smith 17:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reorganised the article, added some extra info and removed the stub status. I can't imagine this article growing much more, so it's no longer worthy of the stub status in my opinion. Johnnykimble 16:02, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I've also replaced the 'anonymous alias' section with 'Overriding aliases'. Anonymous aliases isn't a term that seems to be very well known, so the overriding aliases section describes the same thing with more general terminology. Johnnykimble 16:07, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

message: This needs to be split into two articles ("alias unix shell command" and "alias windows shell command")  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brosenthal (talk • contribs) 05:10, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This needs to be split. 
Talk:The All New Alexei Sayle Show

message: This will need confirming, but as I remember it the "Bloody sod yer, then" bit of Bobby's catch phrase wasn't actually part of his catch phrase at all - it was merely a dejected response to the audience who refused to reply with Bobby's preferred audience response (which was something like "we're all diddling well, Bobby, how's things with you?" or some such over-lengthy reply.)Paul-b4 (talk) 14:12, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bobby Chariot 

message: I've amended the worst sides of [the various comedians] to the least politically correct sides of, on the assumption that this is what worst was referring to.
Musiconeologist (talk) 15:59, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Value judgement

message: * This is mentioned in paragraph 2 as though already familiar; an explanation is needed of what it was. [Note: I've now added this, with a link to the article about it.]
* Unclear whether the use of recurring characters was new, or whether Stuff also had them but The Alexei Sayle Show introduced new ones. Could be edited to either rucurring characters. These included or further recurring characters. These included.
Musiconeologist (talk) 14:09, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Stuff''

message: The July 30th, 2007 version includes information about the show's writers; I've added them to the information box, but not checked their accuracy. I'm assuming that they were accidentally lost in the process of making the article's style more enyclopaedic.
Musiconeologist (talk) 19:35, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writers
Talk:Burrow Hill Cider Farm

message: Somerset Cider Brandy is made at Burrow Hill Farm from their cider. There is no need for separate articles. I propose to merge the brandy stuff in as a sub-section of the farm, and I guess I could expand it all a bit. LittlePete 17:32, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Somerset Cider Brandy with Burrow Hill
Template talk:Strider series

message: Why is Osman included in this series? The title of the series is "Strider Hiryu video games". Osman has nothing to do with either Hiryu or Strider, other than having the same character designer, Isuke. Scion, LSCM Webmaster 17:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Osman's Inclusion
Talk:Death Star (business)

message: The article, as it appears on 20 Mar 2007, presents a view of the Enron Death Star or Circular Scheduling trading practice that is consistent with the views of Enron's critics, but that is inconsistent with reality.  Beware of using this article without doing futher research.Energymkt 17:35, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Truth too scary for you, right? Spoken like a pair of Enron shills. Fuck the both of you.Hommedepommes (talk) 15:21, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments about this article 

message: According to the company's own memo they would be paid "for moving energy to relieve congestion, without actually moving any energy or relieving any congestion." For example, if the California power grid was congested with energy flowing south, Enron would schedule energy to be transmitted north to Oregon. They would receive a payment from California for apparently relieving congestion on the grid. Then Enron would schedule the energy to be transferred back to its point of origin, but not through California. Ultimately the energy would end up right back where it started, and Enron would be paid by California without actually putting any electricity on their grid.
I'm not a power disribution engineer, but I fail to see how this is not releiving congestion? Congestion is merely a routing issue. If there is southbound congestion, then by routing power into California and north, then assuming the same lines are being used, this new northward flow partially cancels the original southern flow. This is equivalent to California using Enron's power, and thus pulling in less from up north. Now if Enron buys power back from up north, re-routed to Enron's source by a different route at the correct rate to offset the power they sent into California, the the net effect is as though Enron did not supply any power to California, but did cause power from up north to be routed down, and then west into Californa, bypassing the congested lines.
Thus Enron's actions, assuming they were not on paper only, did in fact relieve the congestion. So I'm a bit confused by this.129.74.231.235 (talk) 17:10, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Did they relieve congestion? Perhaps, but that has little to do with the illegality of Enron's actions. Nor does it absolve Enron of its crime of raping California.Hommedepommes (talk) 15:25, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is this not relieveing congestion? 

message: The article mentions Mr. Forney's indictment and scheduled trial, but not his guilty plea. According to CBS News, John Forney pleaded guilty on August 5, 2004. Gv250 (talk) 17:28, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Guilty Plea?
Talk:Rosenstolz

message: I looked up Rosenstolz because it was on the CD of my CD drive lens cleaner. They put the entire album "Hertz" on it. Should that also be put on one of the lists somewhere? The product is discontinued I think, since I purchased it on clearance. The product is GE Laser Lens Cleaner, ©2006 Jasco Products Company, www.jascoproducts.com during the first nine tracks there is a voice over in six languages for instructions on using the disk. It comes in a jewel case inside a bubble pack card with a bottle of cleaning solution. The only information about the music itself comes from Windows Media Player when you play the CD. The label on the CD and on the card gives no credit to Rosenstolz at all. The only text on the disk is, "Laser disc is programmed with voice & music guide in 6 languages". Rod Lockwood 13:21, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about what should count on their discography. 
Talk:Todd Bowles

message: There's almost nothing about his NFL playing career. I can't even figure out position he played.
Take dc off and add head coach navbox
98.92.236.37 (talk) 04:41, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.  B E C K Y  S A Y L E S  06:31, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 January 2015 

message: There is no citation on Bowles' firing. Can someone include a source such as ESPN?
http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/25650591/jets-fire-head-coach-todd-bowles-third-straight-losing-season  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rivera926 (talk • contribs) 04:42, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 December 2018 

message: Update his coaching record  Pop123435 (talk) 14:05, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  His coaching record isn’t updated  