Talk:Reuse of bottles

message: Reference #3 to the American Cancer Society is a broken link.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Quixotism22 (talk • contribs) 18:50, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference Broken 

message: This article is currently titled "Reuse of water bottles".  This limitation is not realistic:  it relates to the reuse of all types of bottles and contents.  The title should read "Reuse of bottles". or even "Reuse of packages".  Rlsheehan (talk) 14:32, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  All types of bottles 

message: I found the article that several other articles referred to. Based on how long ago this article was written and the fact that it has now been removed from their website, I do not think this should be considered a source that meets WP:SCIRS#Use_up-to-date_evidence:
*
----  Stillwaterising (talk) 09:14, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated source from NZFSA 

message: It seems to me that this article is only made to promote water bottles industry, saying that it is dangerous for people to reuse bottles, and having lots of links pointing to it.
To protect consumers, industry has to respect strict cleaning and sealing norms, which are not required for short-time domestic use. But this is common to all types of packaging of food and drink. Putting water into any type of bottle (including reusable ones like SIGG) may be considered as a type of "food preservation", nothing differs with water or plastic bottles, the main parameter is time. Moreover, sealed food and drink containers expose the consumer to other health risks if he doesn't clean thoroughly the exterior of the container before using it, especially when directly drinking with the container, or when food can touch part of the exterior. This is surely described elsewhere on Wikipedia.
-- Zagadka (talk) 00:27, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disguised advertising ?  

message: I ran the Duplication Detector between the current revision and the URL named above.  The results are here. The tool found 4 sections of text that are copied from the site without quotations or attribution. I am  not experienced in  how to deal with this issue and will be asking for help on how to deal with this. -  Stillwaterising (talk)
I added :Template:Copypaste to the header. This should get the article on the watchlist for assistance. -  Stillwaterising (talk) 23:06, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible [[WP:COPYVIO]] issues found

message: This is now called Reuse of Bottles.  A better title is Reusable Bottles.  Pkgx (talk) 01:35, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  title 

message: Volvic water bottles advise against refilling, at least here in the UK. I refilled one anyway, and lived to scan the label from it (UPC number 3057640136993), if it's any use I can add it to the article? Mongoosander (talk) 02:25, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  safety 

message: I leave a copy below, but I removed the whole section health concerns, because, uhm, it doesn't seem to be anything about reusable bottles in the first place. There's stuff about aluminium (without indication where aluminium is widely used for reusable bottles), bacterial concerns (which are irrelevant due to the cleaning process for industrially reused bottles), etc. As said, text below. Feel free to restore and discuss in detail if you think this was too bold. --denny vrandečić (talk) 20:58, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed section on health-concerns