Talk:Dodgers–Giants rivalry

message: I moved this section from its root on both the Dodgers and Giants pages.
Sorry, BlueMoonlet, I didn't mean to leave out your excellent additions from the original Dodgers' page version. Good to see you added them back; I was merely a victim of technology. My bad there.
I'm doing some cleanup now that this is a brand new page (linking, etc.) as I see others have done as well.
Let's all make this a great page about a great rivalry in a great game.
JamesMadison 05:36, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Giants v Dodgers

message: Add a history of the Giants v Dodgers (or vice-versa) to this page to put all the numbers and anecdotes currently contained into perspective. How would someone from England or Estonia (or Japan or Niger) read about this rivalry? Would they get it?
JamesMadison 06:19, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Add History Section

message: I was always taught that that statement really started the rivalry. If this is the case shouldn't it be categorized on its own.--Seventy-one 06:11, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Are they still in the league?"

message: :Image:New York Giants logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:09, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:New York Giants logo.png

message: :Image:Brooklyn Dodgers logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 09:39, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Brooklyn Dodgers logo.png

message: :Image:NLW-LAD-Insignia.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 10:38, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:NLW-LAD-Insignia.png

message: :Image:NLW-LAD-Insignia.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 17:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:NLW-LAD-Insignia.png

message: Is there actual evidence of  "Beat L.A." being coined by fans of the Giants, or is this just a dubious claim?Redsox00002 (talk) 19:01, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  BEAT LA! 

message: The image :Image:NLW-LAD-Logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
The following images also have this problem:
*:Image:New York Giants Cap (1948 - 1957).png
*:      Image:NLW-SF-Logo.png
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:04, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:NLW-LAD-Logo.png

message: For those who continue to re-add the Dodgers and Giants logos: Please read and understand WP:NFCC. The dueling logos may be a typical image you'd find on a sports web page describing the rivalry, but they fail criteria 8 (the logos do not substantially increase the reader's understanding of the Dodgers-Giants rivalry) and 10{c} (the image description pages lack a fair use rationale for this article). A user who wants to see the logos can easily click on the article's helpful links to Los Angeles Dodgers or San Francisco Giants. szyslak (t) 19:52, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe Szyslak is misinterpreting the rationale and JKFP is 110% right Purplebackpack89 (Notes Taken) (Locker) 09:05, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: Wasn't there an incident that made Matt Williams angrily tell TV reporters, "They'll [the Dodgers] be lucky to ever win here ever again!!!". JAF1970 (talk) 01:51, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matt Williams 

message: My recollection of this brawl from seeing it on video tape contradicts several of the claims. Additionally, the cite used for most of this information does not back up almost any of it that purports to. If no one cleans it up/provides more valid cite, I'll remove the unsourced stuff. "Marichal Hits Roseboro With Bat and Starts Brawl as Giants Top Dodgers" is the repeated cited article that does not verify any of the material it claims to.Whatzinaname (talk) 06:07, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  1965 brawl info

message: Does someone have a source for the first meeting in 1883? I've also seen it posited as the same date (April 18), but in 1884. Bchaosf (talk) 23:15, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Meeting 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Dodgers–Giants rivalry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110913095553/http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2011/09/12/national/a183357D65.DTL to http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2011/09/12/national/a183357D65.DTL
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:43, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Dodgers–Giants rivalry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927143601/http://www.baseballrace.com/races/MLB-1959-NL-Normal.asp to http://www.baseballrace.com/races/MLB-1959-NL-Normal.asp
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=%2Fn%2Fa%2F2011%2F09%2F12%2Fnational%2Fa183357D65.DTL
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:21, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Both the "Bryan Stow beating" and the "Death of Jonathan Denver" were fan violence incidents, so they're  "Fan Violence" subcategories in addition to "Notorious Incidents" subcategories.  Categorizing the incidents as 8.3.1 and 8.3.2 would have a consistent logic to it.  I'm not sure how to do that.  
Also, man, these people are extreme.  It's really not important.
Liberty5651 (talk) 19:52, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subcategories