lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Everlasting Gobstopper

message: Shouldn't there be some mention of the real life verion's ability to change flavors, based on the amount of the jawbreaker your saliva has dissolved? --65.16.61.35 (talk) 20:14, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They change color, but I'm not convinced that they change flavor. --Elijah (talk) 21:36, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, then, you're an idiot. You could always try, you know, eating one. They obviously change flavor, it's not exactly hard to detect. 99.30.228.137 (talk) 22:18, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

text: Just bought a pack labelled "Everlastin" in NSW. I have heard of longlasting though. --124.182.240.217 (talk) 12:21, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The current picture doesn't really let the reader know what they are looking at. The pieces resemble other small candies, like M&Ms or Skittles, or maybe marbles. Perhaps using the branded box would be better. Also, most people associate the Gobstopper with the 1971 movie's depiction - a clunky monstrosity of colored sugar. Could we get a screenshot of that to use here? NotPeterParker (talk) 01:57, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture
Talk:Pundravardhana

message: It is distressing to see that while the world has moved away from the discredited aryan race theory, some people still haven't updated their knowledge.
Some of the article was even written in vaguely racist tones.
It is currently accepted that the aryan, non-aryan distinction is one based on linguistics only and not on genetics. I've edited some portions of the article accordingly.
Requesting other editors to check any sections I might have missed.
Boom
The rulers were of Kirat origin (mongoloid), who were eventually replaced by first Indo-Aryan kingdom who established the Kamarupa Kingdom. 
I think the word 'non-Aryan' should be replaced with the word 'Kirat origin' instead. Tizen03 (talk) 11:22, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: They were related to the Angas as per puranic texts, a Mahajanapada. Kiratas are clearly defined in puranic texts and no such association with Paundras were made anywhere. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:19, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-Aryan "Race" ?

message: There are tow separate pages on Mahasthangarh and Pundravardhana. There is a link. There is no reason why matter from one should be placed in the other. - P.K.Niyogi (talk) 03:20, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mahasthangarh and Pundravardhana
Talk:Syd Negus

message: Given the makeup of the Senate after the Australian Senate election, 1970 (26 Coalition, 26 ALP, 5 DLP, 3 Independent), I don't see how Negus could have "controlled the balance of power". Peter Ballard (talk) 03:22, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, my bad.  Removed.   (norman gunston told me so i thought it was true) —Moondyne 05:36, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Dubious" tag
Talk:77th (East Middlesex) Regiment of Foot

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 77th (East Middlesex) Regiment of Foot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081005195223/http://www.pwrr-army.co.uk/pwrr_history.htm to http://www.pwrr-army.co.uk/pwrr_history.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.regiments.org/regiments/uk/inf/077-787.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 21:43, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Armand Spitz

message: Armand Spitz was a major inventor, writer, and editor, specializing in astronomy.  His development of a cheap planetarium lead to at least 2000 such instruments being installed in schools, colleges and museums in the USA alone, and his planetariums can be found in Israel (Jerusalem and Tel Aviv), Kuwait (which has five), and at least 40 other countries.  There is an award in the planetarium field named for him, as well as a series of regional conferences bears his name.  He is a major figure in the history of science education, and questioning his bona fides is simply stupid.Tham153 (talk) 03:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Text and references copied from Armand Spitz to Dodecahedron.  See former article's history for a list of contributors.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution
Talk:USS William Bacon

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   Calidum 05:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: USS William Bacon (1863) →  – While USS Lovering (DE-39) was named for William Bacon Lovering, that ship doesn't seem to have ever been known as the "William Bacon".  There doesn't seem to have been any other William Bacons in US Navy service, so the disambiguation is not needed, and at any rate, I can't figure out from the article content where the (1863) is coming from. Hog Farm  Talk 19:28, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 January 2022
Talk:List of Formula One driver records

message: In a lot of lists there is a column about entries. I'm wondering if we should change some of those to starts.
When we talk about pole positions, it isn't necessary that the driver starts the race (as we've seen at the 2021 Monaco Grand Prix with Chalres Leclerc), hence why the number of entries is the right stat. But to achieve a win, fastest lap, podium, points, race finish, race lead, etcetra, the driver must start the race. That's why the number of entries give a false indication for the records. For example, the percentages get severely changed because of this, as the entries are often higher than the starts, making the percentages unfairly lower. So I'm suggesting that some (not all) 'entries' columns get changed to 'starts' for wins, podiums, etc. 
Thoughts? Wiki4David (talk) 16:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entries or starts? 

message: While I really do understand and it is for sure fair to set minimum quota of entries strictly in terms of percentage records (Lewis Hamilton leading in 55,99% of the races he entered, 187 out of 334, is by far greater achievement than Markus Winkelhock leading in his only race, Grand Prix of Europe in 2007), then one thing puzzles me. Why 15 entries, not ie. 10, 20 or 25? Is there a reason for that?
I know there are few Indianapolis 500 Grand Prix drivers who entered only few races and some of them scored like 80% of podium finishes or have something 75% pole position accuracy, but there were only 11 editions from 1950 to 1960. 89.151.18.51 (talk) 13:44, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "at least 15 entries" 

message: A lot of references added to the tables are outdated. Some are good, from StatsF1 for example. But some are more than 5 years old and have not been updated. Some are about the recordholder only, not saying anything about the rest of the top 10, which you cannot use as reference. For example news articles about Lewis Hamilton who broke a record. Some references don't even mention anything about the record, they're just there so there is a reference present. This all also causes that there are too many references listed, which also adds up to the data and loading time of this already big page. The references on Wikipedia are there so people can fact check and learn more about what was written. So I suggest we only use references who are useful and tell us the full truth about what is said. Wiki4David (talk) 18:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The references
Talk:Woodblock printing on textiles

message: This article was extracted and restructured from Textile printing.  It needs a lot of cleanup to remove Edwardianism from the EB 1911 text. - PKM (talk) 04:40, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Could be a B-class if only it had references. DurovaCharge! 06:02, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because it is a very incomplete & I think often inaccurate (with present knowledge) account. AS EB it wouldn't need other refs; what it needs is redoing. It hardly mentions China and India, who are probably the oldest cultures to practice it, and, in the case of India, the main exporter for centuries, and the main country still to use the technique. The technique section is probably rather too specfic. Many/most of the historical statements are a long way from current scholarly understanding.  I knocked it back to a start for these reasons. There is more accurate material on some aspects at woodblock printing , old master print and somewhere there is I think a longish old article on Indian exports to Europe.  I come at it from the woodblock printing angle, not the textile one, as it were. Johnbod (talk) 12:37, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Start
Talk:Alice Cullen (Twilight)

message: Someone had a good image uploaded, but just didn't have the right license for it. Would the person who uploaded the image mind re-uploading it with the proper copyright. If you don't know the copyright, then upload it and notify me and I can do it for you. Thanks, ~ Bella Swan? 16:40, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:List of Ergo Proxy terms

message: This page is currently inthe process of being cleaned up. A former user gave episode numbers in sentences to cite info found in those sentences instead of actually citing them. If one can, please go back and cite the sentences with episode numbers in them.Rogue Commander (talk) 04:47, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up

message: This article risk being nominated for deletion due to its failure of the notability guideline for fiction and what Wikipedia is not. Please, consider taking the appropriate measures to address these issues. « ₣ullMetal ₣alcon » 18:30, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Afd
Talk:The Old Soul

message: I would argue that the article about "The Old Soul" is relevant to encyclopedic standards, as they have enjoyed considerable local success, both local (In Toronto) and abroad. Any Google search will quickly locate their own site as well as many, many reviews, with over 50,000 hits for "The Old Soul" in a search using quotation marks. --PopeUrban (talk) 05:04, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Arguments Against "speedy deletion"'''
Talk:Ronald S. Baron

message: what is meant with:
"Baron Capital has been buying up stock and now owns 24 per cent of all the United shares that were sold by the Glazer family in 2012, though that still only represents 2.5 per cent of the club."  ????????????
Which club? 
there is no quotation.
--Luckyseven77 (talk) 02:21, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Career

message: This states that this is an accusation. Are we really going to pollute Wikipedia with accusations?--LedgerTom (talk) 17:34, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, for what it's worth.  A naked assertion is pointless.  If someone wants to take the time to write a meaningful addition to the article addressing alleged failures, that's fine, but as it currently stands, it detracts from the quality of the article.  ButtonwoodTree (talk) 19:56, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I'm removing it, but like you I welcome something with merit in the future, but I doubt it.--LedgerTom (talk) 22:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms 

message: Dear Mr. Ronald S. Baron 
We would like to invite you and your family to our Artistic La Vista B&B in Calitri Campania Italy. 
First week will be free of charge. 
Thank you 
Keep healthy and smile. 
Happy Holiday 
La Vista Bed and Breakfast Calitri Italy 151.19.80.210 (talk) 17:59, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello Mr. Ronald S. Baron
Talk:St Aprus of Toul

message: Are there any reliable (historical) sources for the birth place "Trier"? Warriors and churchmen in the High Middle Ages: essays presented to Karl Leyser on page 57 only mentions Troyes where Aprus' sister's relics where located. Historical sources like Baronius, Butler, Stadler etc. or modern encyclopedias like Bautz did not mention Trier (or „Trèves). Any hint? Thanks. (Could you answer on my German talk page?) --elya (talk) 07:46, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that the source given by Leyser is the "Miracula Sancti Apri",  a hagiographical document with a high POV number, not a historical source. --Vicedomino (talk) 17:56, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No reference given there.  No way to check reliability of statement. Source seems to be devotional POV Roman Catholic, not historical. --Vicedomino (talk) 17:52, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trier
Talk:Angela Orebaugh

message: WP is not a CV hosting service. We don't list every paper and magazine article written by subjects, but rather those for which an argument can be made for notability. For marginally notable people, WP:NPF applies: the article needs to be limited to those things the subject is notable for.
In this case, NEWS.GOOGLE.COM "all dates" indicates that this person is notable almost entirely for writing Syngress books, which is what this article should focus on. Many thousands of people have tenured professorial positions, but fail to meet WP:PROF --- note that Orebaugh's notability as a professor will be hard to establish, as WP:PROF wants cites (or "impact factor"). 
--- tqbf 05:30, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Published work 
Talk:Jonesville High School

message: I have removed the proposed deletion tag as, per WP:OUTCOMES, high schools are usually considered notable. If this school is to be an exception it should be discussed first at AfD. See also the discussion at WP:SCHOOL. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:19, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Organizational memory

message: There is a lot of common content between this article and another paper. Christian Campbell (talk) 06:01, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: May also be self-publishing; either way, needs copy editing and verification of the references to ensure this is not original research.  Harvey the rabbit (talk) 20:57, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism?

message: This article defines org memory in terms of data, information and knowledge. Meanwhile the article on Corporate amnesia defines organizational memory as "the unrecorded event-specific, organization-specific and time-specific ‘how’ of know-how that characterizes any organization's ability to perform". Can either of these apparently conflicting definitions be reliably sourced? --Cat4567nip (talk) 18:45, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The definition is inadequate.   I added a reference to Kenneth Megill's book on Corporate Memory which is published by the oldest academic press in Germany and has come out in two editions and been translated into Serbo-Croation.  I think the decision to merge corporate memory and organisational memory may have been ill-advised.
BrianOrr2020 (talk) 09:30, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of organizational memory 

message: Completed a copy edit. Moved refs to footnote style in an attempt to make the article less confusing. Despite my best efforts, the text is still pretty impenetrable to the lay reader, and sounds like a business treatise, not an encyclopedia entry.  It would be great if a topic expert could contribute more information and rewrite the article in a more accessible fashion. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 20:58, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy edit
Talk:PrimaLoft

message: It's not likely, despite the quoted source, that the Army was looking, in the 1980s, for an alternative to feathers, but rather to other synthetic fibers, which somehow were not adequate. Would be much more interesting to say why the artificial fibers were inadequate.24.6.66.149 (talk) 12:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative to?

message: The numbers I know are only half(!) as good as good down.--Scanmap (talk) 17:54, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "similar dry performance" 

message: Need a chart with the CLO values of various types of PrimaLoft (Gold, Silver, etc).
Grozo (talk) 17:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  CLO Values
Talk:Temples of Humankind

message: Here's a reference for anyone writing the article.  --geoff_o (talk) 06:03, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Aren't those pictures copyrighted?  If so, you're only allowed to use them under fair use, and certainly not all of them (only the minimum necessary). Esn (talk) 00:34, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see anything on their website saying the images are under any kind of a free license. (It would be awesome if they were - they're gorgeous.) So unless the uploader knows something I don't... - AdelaMae (t - c - wpn) 11:52, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've added the photos tag because I think photos are truly important to this article.  some photos are available on Flickr, but they can't be uploaded to Wikipedia because they are under the "noncommercial" Creative Commons license, which is not free enough for WP.  --TexasDex ★ 19:37, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos
Talk:Woodloch Pines

message: Not trying to make this appear to be like an advertisement, but I am starting at their own webpages/sites for creation of the article. ♦TH1RT3EN talk ♦ contribs 06:12, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy delete hangon

message: I expanded the history and additions section, provided information on activities, dining, entertainment, and accomodations. Lrm5037 (talk) 16:15, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates
Talk:The Realms of Being

message: Created page and added a little bit, mostly paraphrased from the IEP. Please add more! --MickCallaghan (talk) 06:44, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

message: The correct title is Realms of Being. See https://archive.org/details/realmsofbeing0000sant/page/n5/mode/2up
The four books comprising Realms of Being (The Realm of Essence, for example) do have the definite article in the title.
The title of the article should be changed either by removing the definite article or by setting the type in Roman (so that the title refers to the realms that are that the topic of the book. Mc2000 (talk) 20:56, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of published work
Talk:Karahafu

message: -According to the Manual of Style page for Japanese articles, it does not appear there should be any reason for a hyphen in this article name (nor "Kara-mon"), and therefore I have moved "Kara-hafu" to "Karahafu" and made corresponding changes in the article text.
-Fixed referencing problems and clarified inline citations
-Rewrote/reworded much of article to a more encyclopedic and legible standard, but used no new sources and added/changed very little information.
-General wikifying - links, categories, etc
This article is an orphan and could use more articles linking to it.
AMorozov (talk) 09:13, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Editor's notes (AMorozov), May-30-2009

message: I notice that there are sources referring to the karahafu as both bargeboard or as gable. Also this article seems to mention both, gable and bargeboard when referring to karahafu. So, is a karahafu a bargeboard, a gable or the combination of the two? bamse (talk) 22:41, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gable or bargeboard (nitpicking)
Talk:Functional neuroimaging

message: I am an author of the paper "Brain mapping in cognitive disorders: a multidisciplinary approach to learning the tools and applications of functional neuroimaging."
Kelley DJ, Johnson SC.
Brain mapping in cognitive disorders: a multidisciplinary approach to learning the tools and applications of functional neuroimaging.
BMC Med Educ. 2007 Oct 22;7(1):39 
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/7/39
Scientists at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Medicine described a useful course model that may be useful at other large medical center to teach the tools and applications of brain mapping. Student learning gains indicated the course was well received and useful to students.
This could be added to an Education section.
We ask the Wikipedia administrators to use their judgement and edit the entry accordingly.
Abe2mu (talk) 06:54, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  add Education section? 

message: Hi, just wanted to mention that this image should be replaced as it includes a mistake.
Namely, it classifies MEG to be more portable than Surface EEG, which is simply untrue, it should be the other way around.
Furthermore, the colours and random bolding just add to the confusion, plus it is missing techniques mentioned on the page. 143.210.86.113 (talk) 14:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of "Main brain functional imaging technique resolutions" is wrong
Talk:Army Mules

message: boy does this need renamed and disambiguized, theres a lot more to army mules than WP mascots Brian in denver (talk) 16:43, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename
Talk:Apply

message: In Talk:Exponential object, it is mentined that If Y is locally compact, then the apply map Z^Y\times Y\to Z is continuous. See compact-open topology.. I suppose that curry is continuous as well ... so its yet another example of apply being continuous. linas (talk) 07:16, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: other examples of continuous apply

message: The presence of what appear to be two lead sentences suggests that the accompanying article is about two disjoint classes of functions, that have some kind of isomorphism a the top level but are otherwise separate topics, and that it should be subdivided into say Apply (programming) and  Apply (categories). If not, it probably should 
# unbold the title at the 2nd occurrence, and 
# include a short 'graph, immediately following the first sentence, directed at helping the other 95% of WP users become reasonably confident that the link they followed to it is not just a cruel joke.  
--Jerzy•t 01:15, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a multi-stub article? 

message: I'm abt to remove the entry 
: * The action of Apply, in computer science
on the Dab Application (which is in many other ways wretched) bcz the word "application", when used once in the accompanying article, appears to be pretty much the dictdef inflection of "apply", and not anything one might consider spelling, say "Apply-cation", defined as something like "the effect that Apply has on its argument(s)": it seemed most likely to be, instead, just one more bit of wretchedness, and that no one would find a usage of "application" that would make the accompanying article Apply helpful to them, other than by mere coincidence.    I'd be grateful if someone could agree or disagree on this talk page with that judgment of mine.  --Jerzy•t 06:01, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Application
Talk:Urfa biber

message: In February 2017 an anonymous contributer added "Scoville scale: 30,000-50,000 SHU." 
No, I'm not a pepper scientist but I assure you this is wrong.  I wouldn't be commenting here if it was a little off.  A wild guess not based on any authority but coming from me, a long-time isot user, is that those numbers are off by about a factor of 10.  It is so wrong that if it can't be replaced it should just be removed.
The line earlier in the article: "Urfa biber is less spicy than many other chili peppers," is, in my view, correct.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.218.92.247 (talk) 20:40, 14 August 2020 (UTC)