Talk:Norinco

message: All information about arms trafficking by Norinco has been systematically and repeatedly removed by anonymous users. This information is well cited and relatively common knowledge in the industry. Does anyone know why its being removed on a regular basis?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.9.224.44 (talk) 04:08, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The "controversies" section cannot be 90% of the article as that is grossly NPOV. I have condensed it to just under 50% of the article - even that is too much (only one or two lines less than the combined total article sections above it). Just as the article of Colt or Bushmaster isn't mostly about mass shootings, neither can Norinco article be almost entirely about the life and times of US government agencies and agents in disguise as gun runners. Wikipedia is not a (local) news repository. Loginnigol (talk) 06:41, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Concealing information 

message: :"According to an affidavit signed by two of the undercover agents involved in the investigation, representatives from Norinco offered to sell urban gangs shoulder-held missile launchers capable of downing a large commercial airliner." --Where is this alleged affidavit? 
:RE: Contraversies with Pakistan, the Pakistani news articles cited is clearly commentary and not factual reporting of the news. The paragraph itself seems biased.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carbonmotion (talk • contribs) 19:59, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality Disputed

message: I've made the "Work, Import or Export, and Corporate Progress" sound a lot less like some Sinophobic rant (Chinese war machine, gargantuan [yet not a patch on other arms companies across the world]). I've also removed some unreferenced text (Chinese workers, apparently, love their job producing arms - I doubt anyone has actually asked a single worker, since they no doubt have NDA and other censorship pledges due to the nature of their job).
To be honest, much of the text in that section has no reference, and is clearly written by some enthusiast/paranoid idiot (spelling mistakes aplenty, superfluous words that portray a cynical tone to the whole article) - might as well remove it completely.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.111.120.73 (talk) 16:19, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm inclined to delete the entire "Work, ... Corporate Progress" section.  It doesn't really have any information and is terribly written.  I'm going to delete it and if someone finds issue with that they can reconstruct that section with actual data. Zhyla (talk) 16:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious text, not backed up

message: A lot (if not all) of there civilian market firearms are designated JW-XX. Does anyone know what that stands for? I came to the article to learn this but it's not mentioned. Falcon5nz (talk) 03:29, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Firearms Prefix

message: Norinco is also involved in domestic civil construction projects.
this sentence in the article does not reflect, that
Tehran Metro has been "constructed by" Norinco and
in Ahvaz, Iran a metro urban railway system is being built by "Norinco of China" as "partner" regarding to http://www.kayson-ir.com/divisions.aspx?topic=rtrans --Helium4 (talk) 05:35, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Construction in Iran 

message: with all the heavy handedness of "reliable sourcing" on wikipedia the citation for Axios? Never heard of them and the article structure the link directs to feels all over the place, if you call that an article. Seems like it was written by a bot. With 2 citations I don't feel there needs to be a 3rd and would not personally consider Axios as a reliable source. Based on the quality I feel the argument on why Axios is actually a reliable source, where others are not, would be that Theyve spun off from their careers at Politico and WAPO and are now oligarchs by pedigree of those ordained as ministers of reliable sources here. In a vacuum, based solely on the quality of that citation. I wouldnt link it on grounds Ive never heard of them and poor quality with no value added.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:A0C3:5500:FC73:195A:5398:ED88 (talk) 09:53, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:52, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Data and editors agree that Norinco is the WP:COMMONNAME. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 14:37, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: China North Industries Corporation →  – Common name. Defense news sites seem to exclusively refer to this company as "Norinco." Most non-English, non-Chinese Wikipedias (Wikidata) also call it "Norinco." Schierbecker (talk) 02:06, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 May 2022 

message: As indicated by these two different sources, Norinco and Norinco Group are two different companies that operate in different fields and have slightly different histories (Norinco is an export company with no manufacturing capabilities, while Norinco Group is a Chinese manufacturing conglomerate). Though they are definitely related, I feel like they should be split to reduce the possibility of readers confusing the two. Wuzh (talk) 20:40, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split proposal 

message: What this company makes is missing. Also, that info is extremely critical. Thehistorianisaac (talk) 10:02, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical info missing