Talk:Inclusion bodies

message: I am quite sure that the fluorescence signal does not state much about the folding state of GFP. I think after the fluorophore is formed, the rest of the proteins structure is kind of neglectable. We kept it in direct sunshine exposure, definetely about 40° C of temperature and the fluorescence did not vanish. The overall fold is maybe just necessary to bring the respective residues into close distance... --13:36, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: GFP Fluorescence

message: In E. coli, you can avoid inclusion bodies, by fusing your protein to proteins such as thioredoxin. This can keep the wanted protein on soluble form even under very high concentrations (in some cases up to fourty percent of the total amount of cellular protein).
:: Still I would be rather suspicious about the folding state of that particular protein. --13:23, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Avoiding inclusion bodies

message: Added an introduction paragraph describing what Inclusion bodies are. Fixed formatting and added few cats. Removed cleanup tag. - TwoOars 21:03, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Inclusion bodies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://plantpath.ifas.ufl.edu/pdc/Inclusionpage/Florvirus.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://plantpath.ifas.ufl.edu/pdc/Inclusionpage/CMV/CucMoInc.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://plantpath.ifas.ufl.edu/pdc/Inclusionpage/Poty/poty.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://plantpath.ifas.ufl.edu/pdc/Inclusionpage/Howto.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: See WP:SINGULAR, for example Lewy body.  SandyGeorgia (Talk)  19:46, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: When the title is an inclusive title as Inclusion bodies with many types, would have thought plural use was fine - there are several examples such as cerebral veins, scalene muscles. Lewy body just describes one type. --Iztwoz (talk) 19:56, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  It looks to me like cerebral veins and scalene muscles are examples of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS errors that we should not be propagating. Lewy body correctly follows Wikipedia:Article titles and WP:SINGULAR. Perhaps a broader discussion of how many such errors exist at WT:MED would be useful (if someone knows how to find a list of them). SandyGeorgia (Talk)  19:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I started a discussion at WT:MED so we can get further guidance, SandyGeorgia (Talk)  20:41, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussions usually occur before a change not after - changed back to Inclusion bodies many other such examples include: nuclear bodies, P bodies, R bodies, lamellar bodies, Michaelis-Gutmann bodies, Kamino bodies, Medlar bodies, ketone bodies, and others mentioned on page.--Iztwoz (talk) 21:15, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Article titles]]