lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:LA Ice Cola

message: LA Ice is the best drink in the world, don't you all agree?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.134.237.43 (talk) 18:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  LA Ice is the best drink in the world! 

message: The file :File:Soft Drink.svg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Soft Drink.svg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 21:24, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Soft Drink.svg]] 

message: The file :File:Soft Drink.svg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Soft Drink.svg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 21:38, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Soft Drink.svg]]
Talk:Gisele MacKenzie

message: http://www.archive.org/details/GiseleofCanada  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.226.59.203 (talk) 06:22, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  FYI - more Gisele radio  

message: The Wiki article on Hollywood Squares says she was a square on the program, but that's not mentioned in this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.92.174.105 (talk) 01:29, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hollywood Squares?
Talk:Pseudophakia

message: Does the merge warning mean thar someone will come along and add this article to intraocular lens, or is it an invitation to other users to do that?  Or do we hold a vote? --Rosejpalmer 05:09, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you click on the "Discuss" link on the merge header, it will take you to Talk:Intraocular lens where you can give your input. -AED 05:46, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge header
Talk:Garden of Ridván, Baghdad

message: Is there a picture of the garden or the hospital available?
On http://bahai-library.com/walbridge_encyclopedia_ridvan is John Walbridge states:
:In the twentieth century the Royal Hospital was established there and it is now the site of Medical City, a large modern teaching hospital. Wiki-uk 05:10, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have found a picture now, and uploaded it. Wiki-uk 14:31, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture available?

message: See ECAI Iraq, Historic Site Profile, under Maps, which links to this map from 1849. It doesn't show the island exactly but it show the vicinity near the period.The question is can we use it here? Smkolins (talk) 13:24, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I found this file on Wikicommons, so why not? Won't two pictures be too much for such a small article? Wiki-uk (talk) 13:47, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That's London - I think you may have meant :File:Ridvan-garden-baghdad.jpg but it's not linking right in the article right now (I'd presumed that was because the file was deleted but I guess not.) As for two pictures - yes for the size of the article as is. Begs the question if it should be expanded I suppose. But then I'm not sure which one would be better. Smkolins (talk) 15:47, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Darn - something's wrong with my browser. The picture comes up in Firefox. Another bug to report... Smkolins (talk) 15:50, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

text: I checked with the librarian chat service about the 1849 map and they said "The map is in the public domain, and we are not claiming copyright on the scan.  You can use it in any way you wish.". Smkolins (talk) 16:55, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  might have a period map we can use?
Talk:Backhousia myrtifolia

message: As per either a recent request at or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: not quite at start, needs referencing, image would help - try searching commons or making a request there? However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question. ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the "Requesting an assessment section", and someone will take a look at it.--VS talk 08:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment completed for [[{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]
Talk:Liberator

message: I have made a fairly major cleanup of this page.  I have tried to keep the manual of style in mind.
I removed the following entry because I do not feel that it fits within the ambiguity of liberator:
In a political sense, a person or thing that liberates a group of people or a nation from conquest or political oppression.
Other than that, I hope that all of the changes make sense and are improvements. --150.203.177.218 05:14, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Peters Ice Cream

message: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-05-27/peters-ice-cream-sold-to-french-food-giant/5481658
125.63.18.196 (talk) 06:31, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Article updated. Mitch Ames (talk) 12:03, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  sold to European food firm R&R Ice Cream, 2014 
Talk:Caffe Trieste

message: Try here, for a start. --Calton | Talk 05:17, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Will someone explain why Bohemian Club is the only thing listed under "See Also?"  This could be construed as biased, and I don't see them as having anything in common other than both starting in San Francisco. Slugmaster (talk) 22:14, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: See Also

message: Where exactly is this Caffe located? I recall it is at the intersection of Grant and ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.211.69.149 (talk) 02:36, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What address, or intersection, in North Beach?
Talk:Reconciliation Australia

message: An explanation, even a brief one, of what "reconciliation" refers to in this context would really help make this article more meaningful. At present, it remains unclear what this organisation actually stands for or what the importance of this organisation is. --Smcg8374 (talk) 02:31, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Not only does "reconciliation" need to be defined in context, as stated above, but I'd say the entire article is so vague as to be almost entirely meaningless. Right now I know that a list of people belong to, or have belonged to, an organization that stands for something. Or something.zadignose (talk) 03:05, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Defined reconciliation in the context of the Sociology of race and ethnic relations. Not too sure why the above didn't do that....? Cleaned up some content, yet it currently relies on too much internal jargon. I've searched for reliable third party sources without success. Suggestions are welcome. Rangasyd (talk) 12:27, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: New article created for Reconciliation in Australia, giving historical context. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:06, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reconciliation needs to be defined
Talk:Thomas Dixon Jr.

message: Calvary Baptist Church was located on 23rd Street (Manhattan) until the construction of a new sanctuary at a different location in 1883/1884. A biography of Dixon says he was pastor of the "Twenty-Third Street Baptist Church" in 1889. A book on the Klan in NYC mentions the Calvary Baptist Church and Dixon on the same page, but never mentions a connection between them. The list of pastors of Calvary Baptist Church doesn't include Dixon. This 1875 New York Times article always calls it "Calvary Baptist Church", not the "Twenty-Third Street Church". Here is the edit by  which says he was pastor of Calvary Baptist by linking. The link is also made in the Dixon template, Template:Thomas Dixon Jr.
One possibility is that Calvary left the 23rd St. sanctuary and then Dixon or some group rented it out. So Dixon may have been pastor of a church occupying the former site of the Calvary Baptist Church, but that he was not pastor of Calvary Baptist himself. Is there any evidence to the contrary? Milpack (talk) 18:52, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been a while and I don't remember much. I think Dixon was invited to leave Calvary because the crowds didn't fit in their hall and too much was being spent on renting another venue. At some point, Calvary was not meeting in the Calvary building. But this is my vague memory. deisenbe (talk) 17:47, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Twenty-Third Street Church" = "Calvary Baptist Church"?
Talk:Nowra

message: It can be seen that 'Nowra' and 'Nowra-Bomaderry' are both in this article. How come 'Bomaderry' stands out as a separate one? The two articles should either be split into three or merged into one. Has anyone noticed how confusing the statistical data here are?
58.163.140.194 (talk) 06:51, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Nowra and Bombaderry are both defined localities. There is also a Nowra-Bomaderry built up area which contains Nowra, Bomaderry and parts of several other localities (including other northside suburbs). Things that relate to greater Nowra are discussed in the Nowra article. It would be excessive to have separate article to discuss Nowra suburb specifically.--Grahame (talk) 12:45, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it is odd that ABS has two different definitions of Nowra and Nowra-Bomaderry.--Grahame (talk) 03:33, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Messy Statistics
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Heim theory

message: Strong Keep:  I just wrote 200 words and lost it when I hit a key by mistake. So I will make only two comments.  Some of the contributors to this discussion have adopted a snide, put-down tone when discussing the arguments/thinking of other contributors.  This is not consistent with the principles and ideals that have led to the creation of Wikipedia.  As/if this continues, we risk having the Wikipedia form overwhelmed by pointless debates among individuals stroking their egos or private agendas.  Generally, in this discusion, one finds this snide voice predominationg among those proposing deletion.  Second, discussions of Heim theory would profit if a first-class theorist familiar with general relativity, German, English, perhaps a student in Germany when Heim was still fairly active in the 1960s took an interest.  Sounds like Julian Barbour, Oxfordshire, who also consorts with LQG theorists such as Smolin.  Now is he ready, willing, interested, or even a companion among the quick in having his imagination tweaked by a stray concept?
Oh, and since anonymity seems to promote human nastiness, my name is Hal Porter... for what it's worth. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Halporter (talk • contribs) .
:I copied the above to the article page, where it belongs. Friendly Neighbour 05:45, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Bulahdelah, New South Wales

message: The Bulahdelah bypass has been "approved" by both the Australian and NSW Governments, construction to commence in 2009 and be open by 2011, then a four-lane divided hwy will be "achieved" from Sydney all the way to the Oxley Hwy interchange (Port Macquarie exit)!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.184.8.188 (talk) 14:05, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The future 
Talk:Ebenezer, New South Wales

message: Just deleted the co-ordinates listed within this article as they are wrong. The co-ordinates actually pick up the locality of Ebenezer, Queensland, rather than New South Wales. Perhaps the correct co-ordinates might be added at a later date. --Falcadore (talk) 07:09, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Co-ordinates
Talk:Asakusa Station

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Not only due to consensus and conventions cited, but also to revert an undiscussed "I don't like it" move. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 00:22, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Requested move of associated disambiguation page. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 14:00, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 May 2022
Talk:Glen Innes, New South Wales

message: Did Garry McDonald (Norman Gunston) really live in Glen Innes?  This is given without any reference.  The Wikipedia Garry McDonald page states he was born in Bondi (with interviews with Garry as the reference) and does not mention Glen Innes.  When did he live in Glen Innes?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aussiejohn (talk • contribs) 22:52, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garry McDonald 

message: The "planned" wind farm now exists. I don't have a reference for this, but I've seen it. 110.145.170.78 (talk) 05:23, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  wind farm 

message: Should we add a distinguish as there is also a Glen Innes in Auckland, New Zealand? Fork99 (talk) 22:47, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I dinna think the 'New' is going to confuse them Dave Rave (talk) 07:12, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we add a distinguish?
Talk:Aberdeen, New South Wales

message: It has been proposed to move Aberdeen to Aberdeen, Scotland or Aberdeen city, and to move Aberdeen (disambiguation) to Aberdeen.  The discussion about this is here.  --Una Smith (talk) 16:26, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice of requested move
Talk:Adaminaby

message: I think this page needs a picture of the removal of the old Town - a house on a truck - but where can such photos be found?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ozhistory (talk • contribs) 04:23, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos of removal of old town 
Talk:Kokkai-gijidō-mae Station

message: I feel like merging this article with the article of Tameike-Sanno Station, because both Kokkai-gijido-mae and Tameike-Sanno stations are linked. Calvinkulit (talk) 07:18, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging this article with Tameike-Sanno
Talk:List of sporting clubs in Adelaide

message: I have cleaned up the list by grouping the teams acording to sport.  In the case of Australian Rules football I have divided the teams up according to the league.  Repeating the league in brackets after each one was needlessly repetitious.
I removed all of the teams addded at the bottom of the page but without links.  As I understand it, lists are meant to guide people to pages withing a certain topic area (in this case sports clubs in Adelaide).  If the team doesn't have an article on Wikipedia it probably shouldn't be on the list.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 150.203.177.218 (talk • contribs) 15:09, 5 October 2006.
:I disagree with the non linked ones, the whole idea of a red link is so someone will create the article. Borgarde 13:36, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nishi-Nippori Station

message: I suggest that "Nishi-Nippori Station" is the more appropriate title, since it follows the defacto standard format of hyphenating and capitalizing Japanese station names with a prefix such as "Nishi-" or "Shin-" etc. However, "Nishi-Nippori Station" already exists as a redirect page. It should be noted that many links to this page appear as "Nishi Nippori Station|Nishi-Nippori Station" DAJF 03:40, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Canadian International Dragon Boat Festival

message: Dragon boats is not a sport, you don't need any athletic distinguishment besides not thinking for yourself, secretly loving abuse and/or being lonely. 
Dragon boats is a facade for a real estate takeover where money is invested in uselessness and since people participate, the city has to make space for. This cancer that grows, and tends to disrupt the life of boat owners, involves people's tax money to do their business scam. They also take it upon them to make the law on the water. 
While being the shittiest neighbor to boaters, we pride our Chinese culture and continue using no brained unsocial parachutes to push our agenda.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.98.223.85 (talk) 16:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Salty dog (cocktail)

message: The cultural references are fairly good, but this article is very weak. Perhaps if someone could add information concerning the Greyhound that was previously deleted it could be added to this article and a better one could be created? Otherwise it's probably not worth keeping as a stand-alone article in Wikipedia. --Willscrlt 02:25, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: There are two contradictory statements in the table on the right.  The third row states that a salty dog is served "Straight up; without ice." However, the last row states that the drink is strained into a "glass filled with ice." I believe the third row should state that a salty dog is served "On the rocks; poured over ice." This would be consistent with the IBA recipe for a salty dog, and with the Wikipedia terminology used to describe other drinks that are also served with ice. --ChezChas (talk) 07:15, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: The WikiProject classification for Salty dog (cocktail) is C-class. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria. If it should be a stub, then please set  on this talk page & reinstate the stub tag(s) on the article page.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  17:37, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please confirm classification
Talk:Ueno Station

message: I lived in Tokyo for 8 years and never heard of the "landmark" HRC branch in Ueno Station.  I can virtually guarantee that you could ask 1000 random Tokyoites and they wouldn't know either (unlike true landmark meeting places like Hachikō and the Mitsukoshi lion).  I believe it's wrong to include information like this which derives primarily from a tiny minority foreign community perspective.  But I have a policy not to revert the same thing twice.... just wanted to have my say. Djiann (talk) 15:30, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Its a meeting point within the station. i.e. a landmark within the station (or nearby) where which is clear an unambiguous particularly to a foreign visitor (Was discussed on Yahoo groups "Jtrains" starting 11 Nov 2006). I think it deserves a mention as the English edition is intended for mainly people outside Japan to read. Perhaps also worth mentioning that I was approached by someone looking for it (at the Park gate) and the guy (foreigner) was incredulous that I didn't know. From any other gate at Ueno it would be easy to find. The section on the station building also needs expanding as stations are increasingly not just a place to catch trains but to spend time (and money) in the shopping arcades. Alex Sims (talk) 05:14, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: But, by using the rationale that foreign visitors are going to be looking for it, aren't we crossing the WP:NOT#TRAVEL line, especially if it is not otherwise encyclopedic?  On that side of Ueno Station, you're likely to be told to meet by 翼の像 anyway. Neier (talk) 23:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hard Rock Cafe
Talk:Winfred P. Lehmann

message: It looks like his middle name is Philipp, not Philip. The colophon of _Language: An Introduction_ says Philipp.2601:2C2:400:35A0:AC0E:771:9FCA:3263 (talk) 16:12, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  It looks like his middle name is Philipp, not Philip. The colophon of _Language: An Introduction_ says Philipp.[[Special:Contributions/2601:2C2:400:35A0:AC0E:771:9FCA:3263|2601:2C2:400:35A0:AC0E:771:9FCA:3263]] ([[User talk:2601:2C2:400:35A0:AC0E:771:9FCA:3263|talk]]) 16:12, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Mercadier

message: According to the Oxford Biographical Dictionary, Mercadier's real name was Matthew Strickland.  This is the only reference I can find to this anywhere though and, given that the current article claims he was French, I'm loathe to add this 'fact' in.  Anone know for sure? StuartDouglas 09:10, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the term routier is internally linked to an article which unequivocally states their origin in the 1340's and limits the phenomenon exclusively to the hundred years war. to anyone following this link, the inconsistency is obvious and wp looks bad. i'm not sure how best to correct this, but if no one undertakes it pdq,i will.Toyokuni3 (talk) 05:43, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Routier?
Talk:Malaria culture

message: Created article.
Things to do:
- add stub info
- technical info (how is it done) (blood, medium, incubator, staining)
- use (in vitro experiments, such as drug sensitivity)
- pictures
- history
Lukas 05:52, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: added some images and technical details Hempelmann (talk) 17:27, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures and technical info
Talk:Security Battalions

message: I have tagged this article as POV because of the lead. 
Although not recognized by right-winged resources, there are various references pointing out that Security Battalion recruits were under the following oath:  
I first object to the term "right-winged resources". This is a plain POV. I'm sure that the left in Greece has NEVER cooperated with a communist government (ha!)... but in any case, this POV about the current state of Greek politics has very little to do with the actions of Greek Collaborators almost 70 years ago.  I'm therefore going to remove it without some very firm objections. Hitler was evil... but Wikipedia's mission is to talk about his actions... and the reader can decide. The same is true about the Security Battalions. V. Joe (talk) 04:05, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Oath (pov tag)

message: Under the principle of WP:Bold, I have edited objectionable paragraph to read  Recruits to the Security battalion were under the following oath: 
V. Joe (talk) 04:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fixed

message: It is not known if this was finally taken into account or it was just a "political" flare of the puppet PM.
I have removed that paragraph and replaced it with "It is unknown whether Rallis' views were taken into account by German officiaals." Not great... but a vast improvement over loaded language of previous version. V. Joe (talk) 04:12, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: More POV addressed

message: I think that the entire article needs a substantial rewrite and don't have time to address it myself. Please consider rewriting it with an expert attention. As written the article reads as a lecture against collaboratism. (which I happen to agree with the articles POV)... However... the tone is rather too strident to be exactly neutral... and also uses very loaded language. Cheers V. Joe (talk) 04:15, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: POV tag replaced