lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Dragonlance Deities

message: Most of the articles are found in the list now, thus the navigation template is not really necessary. I suggest deleting it until we do need it. -- ReyBrujo 17:53, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's roughly a 1:3 ratio of gods with articles to those on the list.  Yeah, we can probably get rid of this, however the family tree one can still be useful. DoomsDay349 00:22, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. ddcc 01:43, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So, should we propose for deletion then? DoomsDay349 05:29, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Could be deleted

message: If this is kept, why is  Mina listed as a disputed god if the denouement of the plot revealed that she is, in fact, a deity? Banaticus 20:08, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was disputed because we're unsure on what her alignment is, not if she's a god.  But that was unclear, yeah, so putting her in other is best.  Amber and Blood, which sadly is gonna take about a year, will reveal the truth.  DoomsDay349 21:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mina
Talk:Limited hangout

message: this page is terrible... I can't believe it's remained here at all... I guess it's only because "limited hangout" is (as far as i can tell) a piece of conspiricy theory fandom newspeak that most people wouldn't use or think to look up here. Considering some of the incredibly pedantic 'NPOV' arguments i've read on more popular pages, it's amazing that this survives, especially the list of alleged examples. :-S
86.145.55.59 17:58, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted the most recent edit about the Canadian engineers. There's nothing to suggest that the phrase "limited hangout" was used in this case, or is even applicable. Note that Wikipedia should not make its own judgements in cases like this. A Reliable Source has to use the phrase.JQ (talk) 20:33, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

text: I've proposed a merge of Modified limited hangout into this. The case seems self-evident, so unless someone objects quickly, I'll just be WP:BOLD and do it.JQ (talk) 21:55, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Commments

message: So, what are the odds that it is fixed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.183.21.187 (talk) 01:39, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  blatant NPOV 

message: Please step me through how this belongs in Philosophy. Kortoso (talk) 16:45, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philosophy 

message: Edward Snowden. Benjamin (talk) 07:41, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edward Snowden.  

message: Isnt this concept used quite broadly for example in a drugs raid. The cop asks where the drugs are, but the druggy just owns up to a small stash with the hope that they wont look any further for the bigger stash.--Penbat (talk) 15:54, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broader perspective 

message: since they didn't really disclose any sensitive cables involving the UK, Israel, or other key allies. Зенитная Самоходная Установка (talk) 21:18, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiLeaks' diplomatic cables have also sometimes been viewed as a limited hangout
Talk:In a Biskit

message: *second to last ingredient on my box of Chicken In a Biskit is "dehydrated cooked chicken". --Dagibit 05:26, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub 

message: Chicken in a Bisket was advertised in Ebony magazine March 1964: books.google.com/books?id=RAVl_KwcBuAC&pg=PA141 "Just hatched! Great new snack cracker".
It also appears in Life magazine advertisements later that year.
The article citing it as originating in Australia in 1968 must be incorrect.
76.27.195.93 (talk) 00:52, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction date and country is incorrect 

message: The name "Chicken in a Biskit" is a pun on "Chicken in a Basket." And the barbecue version, which came out in 1966, was called Pik Chicks, presumably a pun on picnic. 96.237.184.133 (talk) 01:01, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Puns and BBQ
Talk:Daṇḍin

message: I would very much be grateful if someone could add a discussion of the types of metaphor mentioned in chapter 2 of the Kavyadarsa. Tibetologist (talk) 15:20, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enumeration of metahpor 
Talk:Morningstar Farms

message: So these are meatless ??
:yup.  youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 00:53, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I just added a list of products and i have emailed morningstar about getting more information about their history. I hope to have the info up soon.
Aidan is cool 02:25, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent addition 

message: Advertising tags are for articles that say things like "this stuff is the best" or "buying this stuff makes you happy". The only way to avoid describing what a company is known to sell is deleting the article. ~ R.T.G 17:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising tags 

message: "Many of their products are cholesterol-free, high fiber, low fat, vegan, natural, and/or kosher."
Really? Did this come from the Marketing Director? They only have one vegan veggie burger. And every time I look at the ingredients on the back of one of their products I feel like I'm reading a short novel.
sifelaver 19:42, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specialty products 

message: A link that is used to support the claim that "some" of Morningstar Farms's products are vegan is dated from 2008.  As a previous comment has noted, there seems to be only one vegan product sold by Mornigstar Farms, so the use of the word "some" seems inaccurate.
2602:306:BC58:5910:544B:3447:E172:618 (talk) 20:01, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's only one, the text should be changed from "some" to "one" and it should note what that "one" is. Flyer22 (talk) 20:09, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vegan?
Talk:Vorkuta uprising

message: ...have little place here. A reader gets the impression the Black Ops realistically depicts the uprising in one level of the single-player campaign.  This is directly contradicted by the remainder of the article, which describes a number of bloodless standoffs, rather than the scores of guards the player kills in a pitched battle in the game.  
If a citation can be found supporting the assertion that the fictional game was aiming for a representation of the actual event, a blurb describing as much MIGHT be warranted.  Meanwhile, the references to the fictional, poorly-researched video game have been removed.
Dpenn89 (talk) 04:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References to Call Of Duty
Talk:Budd RB Conestoga

message: This really should be titled RB-1 Conestoga because the Army bailed out of the contract before Budd delievered any aircraft.Phyllis1753 18:22, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I take exception to your "RB-1" designation. I have not been able to find any original USN source material on the RB, but given the standing USN rules of aircraft nomenclature prior to the McNamara Defense Department, the "-1" would not be applied unless there were more developments of the basic design.  USN aircraft designators (and, to some extent, 1930s USAAC designators also) confuse the vast majority of people in that way.  Grumman's first Navy fighter is another example; the original design was simply the "FF" until a second development was laid down, which would then become the FF-2, but the FF would still just be the "FF" (USAAC designators with this same reasoning were the original P-40 and the original Air Corp P-51...there were actually airplanes produced that were just "P-40" and just "P-51" because no subsequent types existed yet).  USN aircraft designators of that period (pre-1960s) are VERY CORRECTLY stated with just the letters with no numbers.  There was only ONE model of the original McDonnell Phantom produced, so it would very correctly be referred to as the "FH".  The F4U is an example that adds fuel to the confusion fire, because the basic design was altered so many times in development, the "F4U-1" was the first production example to go to the fleet. Adding a "dash" number, especially a "dash 1", to the designator, however, is often an incorrect redundancy. 98.244.146.174 (talk) 17:21, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Designation
Talk:Under the Greenwood Tree

message: What exactly is a "greenwood tree"? what species is that? Or what does it mean?--Sonjaaa 20:43, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Charles Schulz gave this book a shout-out in 1991 in "Peanuts": http://www.gocomics.com/peanuts/1991/08/19 A2Kafir (and...?) 22:19, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  For some reason... 

message: What is a "tranter"? The article kind of makes it sound like it's an office of the church, but wikitionary says it's a peddler. Is he a peddler who's ALSO a member of the choir, or is something missing here? AnnaGoFast (talk) 04:05, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hardy defines "tranter" as an "irregular carrier". Merriam-Webster says it's "dialectal, England. : one that does odd jobs of transporting or peddling usually with a horse and cart." The choir is composed of volunteers that have day jobs (Mr. Penny is a shoemaker, for example.), or, considering mentions of their advanced age, possibly retired. PhysicsR (talk) 23:00, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tranter 

message: under the Greenwood tree 2400:ADC3:126:1E00:55AC:91FD:FCBA:450D (talk) 20:16, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  urdu
Talk:The Trumpet-Major

message: "In this setting, in which he explores the subversive effects and nature of ordinary human beings such when desire and conflicting loyalties on the systemized versions of history."
This isn't grammatically correct. The Themes section could do with a re-write. 80.41.221.35 (talk) 18:00, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly written
Talk:Imogene Coca

message: I believe the page Imogene Coca  should be moved to Imogene Fernandez de Coca with a redirect from the original Imogene Coca.  My reasoning is that an article should be named in the most complete, accurate way possible, with popular or common uses of the topic being placed either on a redirect page or a disambiguation page.   In this way Wikipedia will serve to subtly inform a reader what is the complete correct name of the subject in which they are interested.  --JAXHERE  | Prevaricate at me 14:30, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I respectfully disagree. I think her actual name should be prominently noted, but her stage name is what people will look for her as.--T. Anthony 20:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  rename page 

message: burton's death date is listed as 1953 in the body text and 1955 in the infobox.Toyokuni3 (talk) 04:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Husband's death

message: There is a Youtube video of her performing a sketch on the Steve Allen show in "western dress" with Andy Griffin, Steve Allen and Elvis Presley in July, 1956. Steve Allen introduces her as "Cactus Coca". I would like to see that appearance documented because The Steve Allen Show is not mentioned. Here is the Youtube link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPl_kZTsBqg    Figlinus (talk) 19:31, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Career
Talk:67th Cyberspace Wing

message: This page is so-so historically, but it lacks any current information, aside from the new commander's name.  Discussion on the chain of command change for 8th AF with the 67th Wing and 70th Wing swapping names, if not roles. C'mon - somebody out there should be typing this stuff in! TDRSS 01:20, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current ops or squadrons 

message: It is pretty clear that Section 4 (Lineage) is originally sourced to  , which puts that material in the public domain.  Part of that material is also footnoted.
The information in the infobox is also not subject to copyvio.
--Lineagegeek (talk) 20:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public Domain 
Talk:1991 French Grand Prix

message: Did Footwork dump Porsche (as the main article says) or did Porsche dump Footwork (as the 'notes' section says)? --MartinUK (talk) 12:12, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Porsche

message: Morbidelli went out on lap 10 (so 9 completed instead of the 8 shown here). formula1.com agrees with here, but it is incorrect, I am looking at the video now. I have no source other than the video though, so if anyone else has a citeable source, this needs confirming. I'll leave as-is on the site till it can be confirmed.
82.13.35.10 (talk) 23:00, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morbidelli out lap
Talk:List of radio stations in Egypt

message: There is possible vandalism as one person changed the frequency of the Quran station. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.201.199.211 (talk • contribs) 18:55, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think it would be better if the name of the article became List of radio stations in Egypt, because the article isn't only about stations on the FM band. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 16:44, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing the name of the article 
Talk:List of Bomberman series characters

message: Should the Garaden Devils (bosses from Bomberman Hero) be listed? They were as important (or semi-important) to the game`s storyline as Nitros was. Perhaps they could be listed under one character, if there is not enough storyline for any one individual Garaden Devil to warrant listing their name separately.
Also, on the subject of the GDs, how exactly does Natia fit into tho whole picture? We know Endol, Baruda, and Bolban are three of the devils, but Natia mentioned four, despite the fact that there`s five bosses if you count both her and Cronus. I`ve determined these to be the possibilities:
* Natia is the Garaden Devil, and Cronus is just a pet. 
* Cronus is the Garaden Devil, and Natia is just an accomplice/pawn. 
* They share the role of 4th Garaden Devil. 
I`ve been wondering about this for a while now. There`s evidence pointing to all three possibilities, but I need another opinion. --05:57, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Garaden Devils 

message: This article really needs to be cleaned up quite a bit.  As the opening paragraph of the article states, this should be for important, reoccurring characters only.  As it stands, its an overly long list of random bosses, most of which only appeared in one game.  I think only the protagonists, and enemies that have appeared in multiple games (Bagular, Pretty Bomber, etc) should remain in this article, and have all the game-specific enemies be moved to their respective games' article Rorshacma 09:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup Needed
Talk:Alû

message: Alû is clearly related to the familiar European legends that talk about incubi and phantasmagoric elves (*albh = white = phantom/lepper ?) bringing diseases and bad dreams. Why isn't such an interesting connection even mentioned in the text?
Make sure it doesn't fall under WP:NOR. Langdon, Allardice, and the Monster in My Pocket booklet have been the only mentions of Alû that I have yet found.  --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 18:23, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  mora, mara, nightmare, cauchemar, cialciut, incubus, alp, alben, elf... = Alû 

message: :I cannot find the Langdon book (from 1891!) on google books, and don't have the Allardice book on hand and am not sure how notable it is. The Monster in my Pocket booklet is hardly a WP:RS. I am beginning to wonder if this was an actual mythical creature, or if it this article is WP:OR, based on an out-of-date Langdon, and should be redirect to the Utukku article. Twofistedcoffeedrinker (talk) 18:50, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Langdon book is owned by the Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library, but only as a non-circulating reference item. At least it was--I don't see it in their catalog any longer.  I did find Vol. V on Amazon UK:  http://www.amazon.co.uk/Cuneiform-Inscriptions-Selection-Miscellaneous-babylonia/dp/B000JJBB5A  --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 20:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A serach for both Alu and Utukku gets over 700 hits on Google: http://www.google.com/search?num=50&hl=en&safe=off&rls=com.microsoft%3Aen-us%3AIE-SearchBox&rlz=1I7SUNA&q=ALu+utukku --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 20:58, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the RFCPolicy tag. --CyclePat (talk) 19:03, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for comment 

message: Um... Sure?  I can not begin to think of even the most bullshit postmodern reason to not merge them.  Ian.thomson (talk) 18:41, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:Anne McCue

message: McCue was a guest on an episode of RocKwiz that aired on 7 April 2007. When asked by host Julia Zemiro for her middle name she said "Monica". 130.220.79.99 05:24, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Middle Name

message: "Music Career" section could use a more coherent organization, plus citations. Acwilson9 (talk) 22:07, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Music Career" section
Talk:Fårikål

message: The section about the meaning of "får" vs "sau" really has nothing to do with the dish. It should be removed.
MasterDirk 18:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove section about name 

message: I have no idea if this information added by anonymous user 82.134.72.38 is legitimate, as I have no experience on this topic.  I flagged with citation needed, and removed some information also added by this user that did not follow NPOV.  Any help you can provide in citing this is greatly appreciated.  «Zach Minster» (Petgraveyard) (talk) 20:18, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fårikål Feast Day 
Talk:Feder (fencing)

message: Hi. I just noticed this article, and was wondering how you were able to take my photo off the ARMA site, give the credit for it to Jake Norwood, and give it a copyright so it could be spread across the internet credited to Jake? To say nothing of the fact it is a quick picture I took just to post in the forum and if asked I would have provided a good picture. You can keep using it here.
Also, you might want to change the "The point of a Federschwert is spatulated and would probably have been covered with a leather sleeve, to make thrusting safer" part to "The point of a Federschwert is spatulated and it is possible it might have been covered with a leather sleeve, to make thrusting safer" since there is no historic evidence this was done. It was just mentioned in the post because it looked reasonable. We have done that to make them safer in the couple of years we have been fighting with them, though.   David Welch
:While I didn't make this page, nor take your image, I have made a few edits to the page. If you have time and an interest, please do take a better picture of the Federschwert. Also, feel free to edit and amend this page or others - that's how wikipedia grows. Knowledgeable individuals like yourself are invaluable here, and can provide the necessary influence and intelligence to make an article worthwhile. Also, I see that the image has been edited to reflect proper credit. -- Xiliquiern 19:35, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feather Sword 

message: I'd like to know the source for this, if at all possible. Thanks! -65.12.179.178 00:27, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Average Length
Talk:MCA Nashville Records

message: I think the reason the artists' list is tagged is because of some of the artists listed don't have Wikipedia articles which obviously mention their association with MCA Nashville.  Would removal of artists without articles allow for removal of the tag? Steelbeard1 11:14, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed the list by removing artists without Wikipedia articles. Steelbeard1 19:14, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is artists' list tagged?
Talk:Furzebrook Railway

message: Sources seem to vary on the length of this line. The article says 3.5 miles in the infobox, a statement that wasn't sourced by its author, but which I believe reflects a figure in The Railways of Purbeck (as referenced in the article). The web page from The Purbeck Mineral & Mining Museum referenced in the article quotes 4.75 miles. 
But The Railways of Purbeck also implies a whole series of pits served by branches, the furthest of which (Povington) is over 5 miles from Ridge according to my OS map. So both 3.5 and 4.75 miles look suspect as a maximum extent figure including branches. Unless Povington wasn't rail served, in which case 4.75 miles might be reasonable. Anybody know for sure?. -- Chris j wood 16:47, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length of the line 
Talk:Sequential estimation

message: The reference to the Wald test is incorrect: the article on the Wald test here does not have anything to do with the sequential analysis. The confusion is very likely due to the Wald's  SPRT (sequential probability ratio test) - probably the most known procedure of the statistical sequential analysis.
: So why didn't you remove it? I did it for you. --Adoniscik (talk) 04:24, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Homo unius libri

message: This article appears more like a list of the quotations of “Homo unius libri”. It lacks the structure of an article. In that regard, it fails criterion 1. As mentioned in the criterion, the article should have “a logical structure, introducing the topic and then grouping together its coverage of related aspects”. See Guide to layout  which is basically a template toward the creation of an article. Make sure of the conformance to the other GA criteria before renominating the article. Good luck. RelHistBuff 13:05, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GA failed

message: It has been mentionned here and there that Hitler and Chairman Mao both wrote one famous book, "Mein Kampf" and "Quotations from Chairman Mao Zedong". It is interesting to consider the possibility that Aquinas was referring to the type of person motivated to write only one book, as history has shown someone likely to be single minded in the extreme.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.178.78.220 (talk) 17:51, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Of note

message: Almost all cited interpretations seem perfectly aware that the "fear" is of the formidable intellectual opponent who has completely mastered his one chosen topic. 
But "the internet" seems to assume that the meaning refers to an illiterate yokel who "has only read one book". 
Clearly, at some (recent) point, the general interpretation of the phrase must have changed. 
An indirect hint that this happened around the 1980s is given in Brown's (1985) comment on how the "words are generally quoted today", i.e. Brown is still aware of the original sense, but he is also aware of the shift in general perception. 
But we still have almost no presentable examples for instances of this newer and presumably now more common interpretation. --dab (𒁳) 21:02, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Switch in interpretation
Talk:Carrie Hamilton

message: I came close to deleting the bit about Ryan Adams, since there was no source and it was hard to find mention elsewhere.  However, a Harp Magazine article  says Demolition was dedicated to her, and one song was cowritten by her.  If someone with more time could clean this up and add cites it would make the article better.   Mykej (talk) 11:22, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the article you linked as a reference. We could probably do with having a better source, but this will do for now. Adam McMaster (talk) 16:26, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ryan Adams
Talk:Dick Twardzik

message: A Biography of Richard Twardzik has recently been published, written by Jack Chambers (a Canadian linguistic professor). I have not yet read the book. It is entitled "Bouncing with Bartok"  Clarke S Harris, Punta Gorda Florida ceharris3@comcast.net  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.56.200.4 (talk) 01:15, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled