lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Random encounter

message: Wow, I really didn't expect to find an article on this. 
I took the liberty of adding a couple of lines, but there is still room for more of course, so feel free to add, modify and expand! ;) Brutulf 18:17, Oct 6, 2004 (UTC)
I'm new to making/editing on Wikipedia but feel it's worth mentioning that Random Encounter might also refer to a published comic book, a professional film made in 1998 Directed by Douglas Jackson, or a Russian-American video game cover band. Would this work better as a footnote or as a disambiguation?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.78.136.216 (talk) 19:57, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Final Fantasy series emphasize storyline, and therefore random encounters are relatively infrequent, whereas in the Dragon Warrior series (more heavily inspired by 1980s-style RPGs) they are very common.
Has whoever wrote that ever played a final fantasy game? They are one long random encounter grind IMHO, if this is true then games with "frequent" random encounters must be unplayable. --Pypex 01:40, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Final Fantasy low encounters?
Talk:Timetable For Action

message: Declaration of interest: I have an Anti-Tory viewpoint. I don't think it shows however. Evercat 19:00, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Maria Gorokhovskaya

message: Seems ridiculuous to call her a Ukrainian gymnast if she never completed as such, and in fact never lived in independent Ukraine (emigrated in 1990)
If nobody objects, I'll fix that in a few days.
Ornil 19:21, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:GPL files

message: The majority of images in this category appear to be wrongly tagged, either as a result of confusion with the GFDL or as a result of guessing a license when uploading (GPL was originally the first option on the upload form). Angela. 05:16, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrongly tagged

message: Please see commons:Template talk:GPL for potential issues with GPL tagging on both projects. Superm401 - Talk 07:32, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues
Talk:Perfect mirror

message: Is this a theoretical concept or do they exist? Evercat 20:25, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)

message: Would be good to add some primary citation instead of just a PR item. Here are the articles I find by the researchers mentioned in the press release:
#  Urbas, A., Fink, Y., Thomas, E. L., “One Dimensionally Periodic Dielectric Reflectors from self Assembled Block Copolymer-Homopolymer Blends”, Macromolecules, 32, 14, 4748-4750 (1999).
# Fink, Y., Winn J. N., Fan, S., Michel, J., Chen, C., Joannopoulos, J. D., Thomas, E. L., “A Dielectric Omnidirectional Reflector” Science 282, 1679-1682, (1998).
# Winn J. N., Fink, Y., Fan, S., Joannopoulos, J. D., “Omnidirectional Reflection from a One-Dimensional Photonic Crystal”, Optics Letters, 23, 20, 1573-1575, (1998).
Could someone with access to these articles figure out which (if any) actually report on an actual perfect mirror? Or else adjust the article to indicate exactly how "perfect" these actually are? Maybe check Citation Index to see what's been done since then? DMacks 19:25, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: Why would anyone want a perfect mirror? Is it good for anything? Does it have any practical or theoretical uses?
:There are many reasons someone might want to reflect all their light instead of losing some to mirrors.  A different one for every situation, in fact.  Nothing worse than finding out that you lose too much energy in your experiment to see whatever you're looking for: either have to buy a bigger laser or try to cut down on the number of lossy optics.  — Laura Scudder ☎ 22:43, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why 

message: Do fiber optics count as a sort of "perfect mirror"? – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 10:18, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fiber optics 

message: "A very complex dielectric mirror can reflect up to 99.999% of the light incident upon it..." Is the point that the mirror is complex? Or is it rather that is is high-quality, carefully constructed, or something? 84.227.237.33 (talk) 14:23, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Very complex mirrors
Talk:Prithvi Bir Bikram Shah

message: Could we try and clear up the facts on this page as the dates were originally marked with question marks? --Chrisblore 20:26, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Subject is not notable enough to have a stand-alone article. —usernamekiran(talk) 13:45, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose: being a regent of Nepal for 12 years is sufficiently important to establish notability (given that the national leadership role meets WP:POLITICIAN, in the modern sense!). Klbrain (talk) 22:08, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Lalit Rajeshwari Rajya Lakshmi Devi]] 
Talk:WWBZ (defunct)

message: from VfD:
Our pals at the Blaze, 3 items up: they've been busy. Advert. — Bill 20:29, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This station was located in Chicago and was the debut station for Mancow's Morning Madhouse / Mancow Muller. The Correct Page would be found at WKSC-FM http://www.scottchilders.com/timecapsule/TC3.htm 
--KDSRRGurl (talk) 11:05, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not merge with KBAZ
Wikipedia talk:Entertainment Collaboration of the week

message: Hi everyone.  Just wanted to drop by to applaud you on the new TSCOTW.  One quibble, though--do you think you could change the color of  and ?  I'm the founder of  Wikipedia:Gaming Collaboration of the week, and I chose the light red color backgrounds so they would stand out from WP:COTW and WP:MCOTW...I was kind of thinking that each collaboration could have their own color.  If you want help looking for different colors to use, you can view Wikipedia:Template messages.  Thanks and I hope TSCOTW will progress to become as big as WP:COTW itself! :)  Cheers, pie4all88 20:30, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the colours should remain the same throughout all COTWs - this should be the same as the WP:COTW and WP:MCOTW, just as WP:GCOTW should. violet/riga (t) 20:43, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:MCOTW uses a blue background for their notice that a page is a current COTW. pie4all88 22:02, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: Note that Wikipedia:Infobox has a lot of colors--one of which, chocolate, corresponds with TV theme songs. --pie4all88 20:12, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Quibble

message: The TSCOTW main page says that the next TSCOTW will be determined on October 10, and as of this writing, it is October 17. If this has anything to do with the fact that what this COTW will comprise of is still being considered, that's understandable, but it seems like a good idea for this page to operate in some manner in the interim. Looking at what it seems the votes were on October 10th at 1800, it seems like the TSCOTW was Party of Five with four votes, unless it really needs to have five votes to be considered. In addition, a lot of the listed shows are ripe for removal. Cordell Walker 03:37, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Observations

message: *I suggest that this goes back to being the TV-CotW, and we have a FCotW. I would have made a project page for it already, but you guys were here first and I thought it would be a good idea to see what your thoughts are. -Litefantastic 12:04, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Film CotW
Talk:Berlaymont building

message: The helipad of the original building was located in middle, while meeting room is located at the end of one of the wings.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bxlbjorn (talk • contribs) 09:32, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect: "The helipad was replaced by a cupola which houses the Commission's meeting room, looking out over Schuman roundabout."
Talk:Mines and Works Act

message: from VfD:
No clear content or context. If a sub-stub, it's a very bad one. — Bill 21:01, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.nelsonmandela.org/omalley/index.php/site/q/03lv01538/04lv01646/05lv01736.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  htonl (talk) 21:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: 105.245.122.198 (talk) 12:57, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The cause of mines and works Act
Talk:55 Broadway

message: Did not MI5 or MI6 once hang out in 55 Broadway Building? I vaguely remember that they did. --Tagishsimon
:Interesting if it is true, but perhaps the stained grey stone just looks that way. MI6 now has a flamboyant landmark building, but I seem to recall that MI5 had, or still has, a building closer to Westminster which is notable for having no windows on the ground floor. It has the air of a closed down, derelict bingo hall. -- Solipsist 21:25, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: MI5 used to occupy said premises in Curzon Street, not far from Berkeley Square. The exterior is exactly as described, above.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.244.127.112 (talk) 19:49, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: MI6 occupied Broadway Buildings at No. 54 Broadway opposite the London Underground headquarters from 1924 to 1966. Broadway Buildings was later occupied by London Underground as overspill from the main building. DavidCane 01:00, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:E. W. Hornung

message: So User:SchroCat, please explain how a wikilink to, say, Macmillan Publishers, is useful when checking a reference to  a book published by them. The fact can be useful, I agree, but in what way is the link useful? Colonies Chris (talk) 11:40, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh good, the same conversation for the third or fourth time. I suggest that you go back though the previous threads and glean the answer from them. There is little benfit in wasting time and effort in going over this yet again. - SchroCat (talk) 11:44, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: (BTW, I presume you were trying to ping me? If so, that's not a format that works:  is probably a better template to use). - SchroCat (talk) 11:47, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Which previous threads are you referring to? Colonies Chris (talk) 11:58, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

text: I expect it'll be this one, where I repeatedly asked you for an example of how these links were useful to you, and you repeatedly chose not to provide an example and claimed that you had answered the question before (but you hadn't). If they're so useful that you;re prepared to fight to keep them, why don't you just provide an example and then we can have a worthwhile discussion? Colonies Chris (talk) 17:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That was one, there has been at least one other. Why not drop the stick, move on and do something more useful and constructive, as I fully intend to. - SchroCat (talk) 17:09, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, here we go again. Once again I ask you for an actual example of a publisher link being useful to you, as you have claimed, and once again you avoid the question. It's getting pretty hard to WP:AGF on this. Colonies Chris (talk) 21:49, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I see little faith in your harrassment over this issue. As with the Jacques article, the consensus was against you there and it's time to move on from here too. - SchroCat (talk) 21:57, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publisher links 

message: User:SchroCat can you explain why you won't allow a character inbox on AJ Raffles or a writer inbox for E. W. Hornung? Dwanyewest (talk) 14:39, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a question of me "allowing" or not. I think we had the same discussion five years ago on this? Has anything changed in that time to necessitate an IB now? - SchroCat (talk) 14:43, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: User:SchroCat if we have had this conversation before I apologise. But why don't you think E. W. Hornung should have a writer inbox? Dwanyewest (talk) 15:12, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I tell you what, why don't you tell me why it should have an IB? - SchroCat (talk) 15:48, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no writer inbox
Talk:Yoga Sutras of Patanjali

message: I am largely ignorant of scholarly debates regarding the dating of the Yoga Sutras. However, I edited the Dating section to remove the remarks about how Bryant and Desmarais don't address Maas's arguments. I realize that WP:SYN is not a rigid rule and that the editorializing that I removed probably provided valuable context for Bryant's and Desmarais's claims, especially in a field as specialized as this. Nonetheless, inserting an unsourced claim about what arguments a scholar does nor does not engage with is so blatant a WP:SYN violation that I just don't think it can stand. Or else it's just a blatant WP:OR violation, depending on how you look at it. Our job is to report what reliable sources say, not discuss our own conclusions about which sources engage sufficiently with other sources (in articles, that is—such discussions are, of course, necessary on talk pages, when deciding whether to cite a given source at all). Find a reliable source that notes Bryant's and Desmarais's shortcomings. --Phatius McBluff (talk) 23:33, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:SYN]] removed from Dating section 

message: Please define (and make blue) "Vedanta"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:19C:4C80:5290:B536:2447:43D2:DD12 (talk) 11:17, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  1st section, 3rd paragraph, 2nd sentance 

message: you added a direct quote from Edwin Bryant to the lead, disregarding the treatment of this topic in the section on tge influnce of the YS. Apart from being a copy-vio, it's also a violation of WP:LEAD: the lead summarizes the article; we don't use it to give WP:UNDUE to one particular point of view. We also don't WP:CENSOR the article, which you did when you "corrected" the info on the close relation with Buddhism by removing it. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 15:41, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edwin Bryant & Buddhism
Talk:Safrole

message: Limonene (in orange juice) and caffeic acid (in tomatoes) are concidered benneficial anti-cancer foods.
So, is safrole similar to them or opposite?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.247.199.50 (talk) 16:59, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Carceinogenicity

message: Please think about it. Safrole weighs 162.188 g/mol and has a molecular formula C10H10O2.
Microswitch 04:59, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  It doesnt need to

message: I'm removing http://monographs.iarc.fr/htdocs/monographs/vol10/safrole.html from the external links because its broken. Jawareham 12:42, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The link to http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol10/volume10.pdf seems to not be broken today. 67.86.73.252 (talk) 12:46, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: *--Stone 16:34, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference

message: Some sources state that safrole is contained in black pepper. This should be added to the article. Badagnani (talk) 03:41, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like it isn't particularly abundant in black pepper oil from a quick search.  Black, Black & White pepper at 0.52% or less, White pepper at 2.98% (although that was using a "scent analysis" technique that involves air sampling followed by GC/MS in one paper testing pepper varieties specific to Cameroon.  Other journals that analyzed don't even list it...  This one doesn't list it at all, nor do most I can find.  The black pepper page on Wikipedia does list it, but doesn't have a reference listed. They Terk Err Jerbs (talk) 14:21, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safrole in black [[pepper]] 

message: Although I don't  think there is a way to prove what a molecule smells like, I can attest to the following: sassafras bark has a smell more reminiscent of coca cola than modern day rootbeer. Sassafras oil has an initial clean cola scent followed by a somewhat rancid wood mulch smell. I think safrole is the first note and various impurities are the second note. I have never smelled pure safrole, but I think the smell of sassafras bark is probably the best representation. Source: I live in an area of Pennsylvania where Sassafras albidum is endemic. I have also seen it distilled. Sorry I can't  be more scientific.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FB90:315:9A69:0:8:B03D:D501 (talk) 21:47, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smell of Safrole 

message: Sizeofint (talk) 02:48, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential source 

message: The final paragraph in the "Natural Occurrence" section is mostly just a rewrite/duplicate of the above paragraphs. One or the other should be removed and edited. Baconaetor (talk) 16:38, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Natural Occurrence Section Duplicate
Talk:Anastasius Bibliothecarius

message: Is this violating any sort of copyright?
:No. New Advent's copy of the Catholic Encyclopedia is old enough to be public domain. —No-One Jones (m) 22:07, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *These two are really the same person? If so, merge. This should be the destination article. Maestlin 03:26, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Inspector general

message: The link to Internal Affairs appears to be a link to a "hardcore punk" band.  Should either remove the links or have a disambiguation page.
--Hurricane111 22:09, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The OIG in the U.S. also inspects military contractors. I know this because the company I work for has just finished up with one.Jlujan69 05:05, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  minor alteration 

message: I'm adding Congress's CRS reports to their relevant pages, since they're so thorough and you can just copy-and-paste the content ... here's yours:
http://wikileaks.org/wiki/CRS:_STATUTORY_OFFICES_OF_INSPECTOR_GENERAL:_A_20TH_ANNIVERSARY_REVIEW%2C_November_20%2C_1998
btw, IMHO the US content will need to get moved to Inspector General (United States) pretty soon
Agradman talk/contribs 08:20, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free encyclopedic public domain source (CRS report) 

message: Modified November 7, 11:00 AMERICA and legal government approved entitled entity Updates for Kenneth Alan Clingerman Jr owner ChromeUpdates approved for Kenneth Alan Clingerman Jr owner of the United States of America and patent Owner IANA ICANN legally allowed to be able provide protection program application approved for Kenneth Alan Clingerman Jr owner and approved by president Joe Biden and UK Canada and United Nations is a W3C AccountData account web access for Kenneth Alan Clingerman Jr owner 2600:1012:B125:56E:F61E:4EB9:4493:E764 (talk) 19:21, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspector general/kennethclingerman@org.gov 

message: I'm fully disabled my name is Freddie Stokes I'm I'm bed most of my days that's where most of the harassment is they do not care weather I know they are there or not as well as taking photos of me in bed and bathroom trying to make it look like and planting stuff as well in my house and taking photos as well as my doctor's offices I've tried 5 times to get help at the doctors ive reached out to several agencies they said to contact internal affairs I cam hear them saying they are going to make it look like I'm doing something wich I can prove I don't do drugs or anything can you please help me on this issue before they kill me all month I've had really bad chest pain as well as a stroke today I know this sounds like a rant but it's not I swear please help me Freddie Stokes (talk) 06:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sevierville police dept and sheriff dept
Talk:Hāngi

message: "Traditional hāngi food is pork, mutton or lamb, and chicken" - anyone got any information on what food was in a hangi before pakeha got to NZ? AstroDave (talk) 15:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: This article needs some photographs to illustrate the process. – Kaihsu (talk) 10:49, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  photograph illustrations
Talk:Minister of Health (Canada)

message: Taken from "Minister of Health" (which was mainly linked to by articles on UK ministers):
"
Minister of Health Canada: Pierre Pettigrew member of Cabinet of Canada (2003-) in the first Paul Martin Ministry.  Assisted by Minister of State Carolyn Bennett (Public Health) (a priority in the wake of SARS & BSE and in anticipation of pandemic influenza like the Spanish Flu and Minister of State (Development of Drug Agency) to improve regulation of pharmaceuticals.
"
Timrollpickering 22:26, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Category talk:Football clubs in Yugoslavia

message: Just to quibble, it was the Kingdom of Yugoslavia only from 1929-1941, surely? Before that it was the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. -- Arwel 22:33, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: True :) I'll add it in. --Joy [shallot]
This category should be renamed into "former Yugoslav football clubs". And that should refer to period 1918-1991.
That means, you can't put into this category clubs formed durging the existence of FR Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro). 
FR Yugoslavia wasn't "more Yugoslavia" than any other former Yugoslav republic. Kubura 09:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)