Talk:Korea Strait

message: The article currently (10:22, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a word-by-word translation from Japanese, judging from Battle of Tsushima.  I'm not sure why that's relevant, though -- then again, I'm not sure why this sentence is in this article at all. As a general rule, namecruft should go in the relevant article only, IMHO.  -- Visviva 12:52, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

text: Lots of online info about the Busan-Tsushima and Fukuoka-Tsushima ferries.  If there's one from Shimonoseki, it keeps a low profile.  Will update. -- Visviva 12:52, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact Checking… 

message: I've used  to add information on the Strait. There are still gaps, such as the geography of the water, or the economic significance. There could also be more on which invasions (when, who, links) took place here. Somebody knowledgeable, plase… Kokiri 11:12, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Added information/gaps

message: See, e.g., Choon-Ho Park, The Korea Strait, in International Navigation, supra note 49, at 173; Prescott, supra note 55, at 23-24.  One informed commentator has written that the same approach of claiming limited three-nautical-mile territorial seas utilized by Japan and Korea to allow navigational freedom has also been used by “Germany and Denmark, and by Denmark, Sweden and Finland.”  Bernard H. Oxman, Applying the Law of the Sea in the Aegean Sea, in Problems of Regional Seas 2001 at 266, 279 (Bayram Ozturk ed. 2001).
This is the reference (#74) in the paper being referenced for South Korea & Japan's 3 nautical mile territorial claim in the Strait. I don't know how to format it or if it should be added though, so I'll add it here for now. --MeekSaffron (Jaffa,Tree!) 02:35, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  the reference in the reference paper 

message: Deiaemeth, if you point Liancourt Rocks, please see also Talk:Liancourt_Rocks#Sorting_order_of_multilingual_name_infobox. I have explained the usefulness of consistent sorting order.  Appleby reasoned the Liancourt Rocks is disuted territory and dokdo is more common than takeshima. None of them applies here.  The Korea Strait is not disuted territory and those local names are not common in English.  Liancourt Rocks is an exception rather than a rule. --Kusunose 03:45, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Korea Strait is direct translation from the name 대한해협 or 한국해협 (older usage). Alphabetical listing is not the case here, since the English name itself is derived from the Korean name. Deiaemeth 03:51, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorting order of multilingual name infobox 

message: I agree with battle of Tsushima issue, but the following two links are not broken, confirmed.
#  Japan Hydrographic Association  	 
#  Ministry of the Environment, Japan
I added above links again. Isorhiza 09:54, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, my bad. I thought those links were broken. There are nothing on "battle" here - I just removed two links that I thought were broken. Please re-add those links again. Deiaemeth 09:56, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I re-added them. Deiaemeth 10:06, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of two references by [[User:Deiaemeth|Deiaemeth]] 

message: and I are on some kind of probation after I filed his continued following me for on-and-off 10 months to WP:ANI, so I could not revert any of his edit within 5 days (vice versa) However, we're allowed to use talk pages of articles at the same time, so I point out on his game the rule at this time. This article should follow naming convention on Sea of Japan (East Sea) section by the previous discussion between both Korean and Japanese side editors on 2005 (although I don't agree with such old decision). Well, he reverted my edit in support of breaking the rule (does he ever read and regard that rule?). This should be fixed by any editors. Thanks. --Caspian blue (talk) 17:59, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't think it needs to be fixed at all. Seems all fine to me. Sennen goroshi (talk) 18:57, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're not a decision maker on the old and established consensus.--Caspian blue (talk) 19:03, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Obviously, that is why I used the words "think" and "seems" - in order to emphasize that it was merely my opinion. Sennen goroshi (talk) 19:14, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You reverted because I edited the article. So your excuse on your breaking the rule is not a good one. Besides, this thread is to notify other editors on your change, not you because you breaks the convention. If we're continuing to argue over nothing, well, that is not good for both of us. Theresa said she could take a suitable action to either or both of us if she thinks of any discussion at talk pages of article disruptive. So why don't you wait for other's response?--Caspian blue (talk) 19:20, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

text: I have a good idea, Caspian - why don't you stay away from talk pages related to articles that I am editing, and I will do the same, oh and send me an E-mail please, born_of_jackal@yahoo.com - there is something I wish to discuss with you, that is not suitable for a wikipedia talk page. Sennen goroshi (talk) 19:44, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Oh, I didn't notice, I was wrong. Oh well, I self reverted. I don't often make mistakes, so sometimes I am shocked when I mess up, I guess it is hard being so close to perfection. Sennen goroshi (talk) 19:48, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:Sennen goroshi]]'s breaking [[WP:NC-KO]] 

message: Tsushima strait is an another name in Korea strait. It's not a easten channel of the Korea strait. Please correct a wrong chart. Arstriker (talk) 18:44, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong chart 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Korea Strait. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070629131922/http://www.history.navy.mil/wars/korea/navalbattles.htm to http://www.history.navy.mil/wars/korea/navalbattles.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Korea Strait. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130108194008/http://www.russojapanesewar.com/tsushima.html to http://www.russojapanesewar.com/tsushima.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070513204809/http://www.jha.jp/kaizu/f_o.htm to http://www.jha.jp/kaizu/f_o.htm
*Added archive https://archive.is/20070609074111/http://www.kordi.re.kr/atlas/asp/kstrait_1_1_1.asp to http://www.kordi.re.kr/atlas/asp/kstrait_1_1_1.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:48, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified