lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Roger Keith Coleman

message: Content here is very similar to the following:
http://www.lairdcarlson.com/grip/Coleman/Case%20Summary.htm Fusion 03:41, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thought, "not filed in a timely fashion" is not correct.  "Not filed timely" means it was not filed within the specified time limits.  "Not filed in a timely fashion" simply means it took a while to file.  There is a difference, though it is subtle.  One simply says it was a little late, while the other says that the late filing violated a rule of procedure. Jrkarp 04:30, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - this is a legal point, and there's a proper legal term. bd2412 T 04:51, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It might be worth it to make a brief explaination of the term in the article, as the casual reader will not necessarily be familiar with the legal concepts.  I'm not a lawyer, so I am not in a position to sort out the wording. --Bletch 13:01, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - sort of.  I added a sentence citing the time limit and the late filing.  I think from the context people should understand it.  If not, I'll add a further explanation. Jrkarp 14:18, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've added the prosecution's case, info about the controversy over Coleman (in other words, why he is newsworthy and why he should be in an encyclopedia), details about retesting DNA, the section on "Significance for the Anti-Death Penalty Movement", plus references.  Boy, are Wikipedia footnotes a PAIN.  Chloe Wong 04:40, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions to Article

message: A local paper called the anti-death penalty activists “The Committee of Sappy Women”, after a remark by Mark Twain about a similar group in his time. Twain spoke of them “...wailing around the Governor, imploring him to be a merciful ass and trample his duty under foot.” Can we find a source for this, and add it as one local reaction to the case? 2A00:23C3:E284:900:F52E:2E93:3607:8F75 (talk) 14:20, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Contemporary remark

message: Part of the article claims that DNA testing was not available at the time (in regards to the blood splatter on the accused's pants), and yet another part of the article claims that his defense argued that semen found on the victim contained DNA from multiple men. This is vague and confusing. 2605:A601:A605:4C00:DC5:B8AC:675F:5A25 (talk) 06:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  DNA Testing
Talk:Stars on 45 (song)

message: I found this article simply titled "Medley" several places in Wikipedia.  I don't think the official 41-word title is appropriate.  Every book I find that mentions this song refers to the song as the "Stars on 45 Medley".  It also avoids the disambiguation page for Medley.  I will go through and changes the links so they link to this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rt66lt (talk • contribs) 23:41, January 12, 2006
: In Billboard Number One Hits and Billboard Top 40 Hits by Joel Whitburn, the full 41-word title is given. But we should be consistent with The Talented Mr. Ripley (film) regarding short, common and lengthy, official titles (which this currently is). —Twigboy 15:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you sift through the actual charts in 1981, the 41-word title (not just "Stars of 45") is given.  However, either way would be fine, and I don't think any changes need to be made to this article regarding that at this point. Drdr1989 02:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  41-word title 

message: Why is this article defaulted to British English?  It's a Dutch recording, not British.  It was originally written in American English, shouldn't it stay that way?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.65.230.52 (talk) 14:24, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe because it's primarily a Beatles medley and they were British? Or maybe the Dutch group used English spellings when they wrote in that language? 86.27.226.94 (talk) 11:39, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "British English" article

message: Right at the start there is a clear sample of "Beat The Clock" by Sparks, it's before the "medley" section but they appear to not get any credit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.27.226.94 (talk) 11:40, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sparks uncredited sample 
Talk:Yaroslav Osmomysl

message: Ехх, guys! Why do you hurry? I requested his face reconstruction to be scanned and sent to me. As well as planes od Cathedral, etc. But it will take some time.--Bryndza 03:44, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In 2016 a tooth from the skull was used for Y-DNA analysis, which revealed that it was a bearer of E1b1b, furthermore, entering the Y-Chromosome markers into NevGen Predictor the results predict E1b1b1a1b1a haplogroup.Return. The whole truth about the search for the remains of Yaroslav Osmomysl. Investigation Movie (in Russian) Biblicaldna (talk) 05:34, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read :Wikipedia:Reliable sources. That video does not meet the requirements for use as a source in Wikipedia. When the results have been published in a source that is recognized as reliable by the Wikipedia community, then you can offer that source to support an edit. Note though, that determination of whether information is pertinent to or suitable for inclusion in an article is subject to the consensus of the Wikipedia community. - Donald Albury 18:34, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

text: Sorry, we can only include that if it gets published here. 😐  Tewdar  19:53, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the published reference for ? If it has not been published by a reliable source, it cannot be included in Wikipedia. Sorry to disappoint you, but nobody here is going to .  Tewdar  08:24, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

text: Unfortunately we cannot include archaeogenetics results published by film director Igor Piddubny on Wikipedia. If Yaroslav Osmomysl's haplogroup is ever published by a reliable source, of course we should add this important information to the article. If you are a , you could probably publish the  results yourself in Nature or whatever. Have an outstanding day. 😁👍 Tewdar  13:36, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Donald Albury@Tewdar See . This editor is harassing me  offwiki. Doug Weller talk 16:04, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, I wish someone made an hour and a half long video starring me! All I get is cameo roles! 😁👍 Tewdar  17:18, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Y-DNA analysis of the remains
Talk:Aftermath (Phish song)

message: This should be moved. This page was originally set aside for the R.E.M. song by the same name, as shown on the disambig page for Aftermath. Additionally, the R.E.M. song is more notable, as it was a single that charted.
A better place for this would be Aftermath (Phish Song) Bsd987 03:46, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This move has been completed by Badlydrawnjeff.  I have removed the  tag so that this page no longer appears on :Category:Requested moves. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 18:29, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Mortal Kombat

message: This artikle repeatedly uses the letter C to represent the voiceless velar stop. I rekognize that Wikipedia does not generally have a preference for one dialekt of English over another, but in this kase I think it's klear that the konvention within Mortal Kombat studies is to use K for this sound, retaining the letter C for other sounds such as the sibilant 's' sound and digraphs such as 'ch'. I propose that this major change be made in this and related artikles, and if no further diskussion is warranted, I am willing to do so myself. 73.164.3.207 (talk) 17:40, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: You've got to be cidding. Of course no. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 19:33, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

text: LMAO --uKER (talk) 21:39, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with SNAAAACE and UCER. (Khaheel Riens (talk) 21:55, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preponderance of C for hard 'K' sound 

message: SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 07:09, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed the unconfirmed animated film rumor, remember to split content from here to a new article once (if) the reboot enters shooting 

message: The word 'Origins' under the 'Development' tab is misaligned. This makes the article look unprofessional in my opinion. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 19:57, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The word 'Origins' under the 'Development' tab is misaligned 

message: moto kombatiyi  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.186.1.202 (talk) 22:45, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  mulukarimu 

message: NPR's Consider This has recently interviewed with the creator of this game, Ed Boon earlier last week. Should we include some of his talks on this articles? VernardoLau (talk) 17:09, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ed Boon interview on NPR
Talk:Shannon Kleibrink

message: There should be articles written about Kleibrink's teammates, particularily Amy Nixon.
:I'm on it, but I'm not Canadian so I might not do great at it. I did watch their match with the US though and they're pretty good. Or maybe the Americans are just terrible, but either way it looked like a blow out. Anyway I'm not real familiar with this sport, but I mostly followed the game so will see what I can find on Amy Nixon.--T. Anthony 11:47, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Drew Gooden

message: As the deal is formally being approved, I've semi-protected the article for 28 hours to prevent any rash speculative edits.  --Madchester (talk) 21:57, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Semi-protected

message: I was searching the internet for more information about the YouTuber Drew Gooden, who I just discovered and who has nearly 750,000 subscribers on YouTube. I was surprised to learn that there is no Wikipedia article for this Drew Gooden, but that there is an article for a separate Drew Gooden who plays professional basketball. Since the YouTuber Drew Gooden is a fairly notable person on YouTube and formerly on Vine, and since it appears that there is considerable confusion between the two Drew Goodens by this article's edit history, I was wondering if a separate Wikipedia page could be created for the other Drew Gooden.  24.184.141.67 (talk) 03:33, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Drew Gooden
Talk:Dvůr Králové nad Labem

message: Pavel,
I agree with you about sorting links by relevance (as you explained on my talk page.  Sorry I fiddled with it.
John 04:25, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorting external links lexicographically 

message: What does it matter what the German nation historically named this City? It may be of interest within the context of the article but should have no place in the introduction.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.23.129.201 (talk) 04:46, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  German pronunciation
Talk:Mythopoetic men's movement

message: Just noticed the notability tag and refs pull this morning so wanted to explain my thoughts and rationale for placing them back. Although the term "mythopoetic men's movement" is largely an academic one, certainly the subject merits treatment. Whether this particular page remains a stand-alone article or becomes a sub-section of men's movement with a redirect is not, to my mind, particularly important, so long as the content is retained. I need to check but believe that at least some of the references were originally inserted by me back when the article was simply called "mythopoetic" and not been narrowed for men, so Estes is arguable. The work of Moore/Gillette (which was strongly embraced by MKP and Meade is less so. The mess around "mythopoesis" might perhaps be addresed with a disambiguation page? - Rorybowman 17:14, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree the topic is notable, a whole section of our book store concerns this, so I removed the Notablity flag. Goldenrowley 18:03, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References and Notability 2jul2007 

message: Is this the same as the Men's Right's Movement? Shouldn't there be a disambiguation link?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.15.240.111 (talk) 10:22, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Men's Rights Movement

message: I'm no expert on the movement, but AFAIK the "mythopoetic men's movement" is myth enjoying, myth interpreting, myth consuming, myth reading, myth studying, myth applying, and myth resurrecting; it's not myth inspiring or myth creating. Fine that it's what people call it, but if we're to discuss the etymology in the article, it ought to be pointed out, this subtle change in sense of the term. 98.13.244.125 (talk) 19:59, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mythopoetic  and mythopoeic mean "involved in myth creating"
Talk:International Nuclear Event Scale

message: The mention of "an eventual death toll of 4,000–27,000" for Chernobyl isn't supported by the sources indicated as references.
Has someone confused cancer cases with cancer deaths?
Besides, the references are old and/or vague. As far as I understand, the scientific community has abandoned the old linear models for estimating health effects of low radiation doses, so the 2005 WHO 4'000 estimate has been abandoned and newer WHO or UNSCEAR reports typically talk about the 45 or so known deaths. The ourworldindata source makes an estimate of 300-500 and UNSCEAR's
"CHERNOBYL 2017 WHITE PAPER Evaluation of data on thyroid cancer in regions affected by the Chernobyl accident"
describes roughly 20'000 thyroid cancer cases totally among young in Ukraine and Belarus, and estimate around 25% caused by the radiation from Chernobyl. With a 2-8% death rate for such cancer, that translates to 100-400 deaths. I see no recent, serious sources mentioning anything more than hundreds or so. MagnusLycka (talk) 20:59, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chernobyl Eventual Death Rate 

message: Is there a clasification for the 1966 Palomares B-52 crash under the INES? I think it could be a nice addition to the table and from what I've read, it could be classified as a Level 2 incident, but I haven't found sources regarding this. NoonIcarus (talk) 22:40, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Palomares crash 

message: My guess is that the 1958 incident would be level 4, but I have not been able to find any source that confirms this. (Fuel rod was damaged and caught fire, reactor was damaged, interior of building + 0.4 sq km contaminated.) https://www.nuclearfaq.ca/cnf_sectionD.htm#nru1958
Note that the List of civilian nuclear accidents article lists it as level 5, but this may be due to a misreading of the following source discussing the 1952 incident: http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2016/ph241/zerkalov1/docs/mukhopadhyay.pdf KaiaVintr (talk) 18:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think we need more examples in the table; we already arguably have too many. VQuakr (talk) 18:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Suggestion is based on the fact that Sellafield appears in the list eight times, and calling the Chalk River accident the "first" naturally makes people wonder about the others. But anyway, if no reference can be found for the rating, then not much can be done. KaiaVintr (talk) 18:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second (1958) Chalk River incident should also be in this list
Talk:Comparison of wiki hosting services

message: The link in the article "Confluence hosted" gives nothing about the site Confluence to host a wiki, it's only the link toward the software.
Same thing for "IMeet Central"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.91.248.85 (talk) 02:03, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Brief information about this aspect could possibly be added to their respective main articles (as closely-related details). If you can provide reliable sources, you are welcome to edit these articles yourself. GermanJoe (talk) 05:16, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confluence 

message: Miraheze and Shoutwiki are missing in the list.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.91.248.85 (talk) 02:03, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Notable topics need a stand-alone article based on independent sources (see also WP:GNG and WP:WTAF) before they can be added. GermanJoe (talk) 05:16, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

text: By the way, please sign your posts with 4 tilde characters ~~~~ to add an automatic timestamp and signature. GermanJoe (talk) 05:16, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing sites 

message: ...some love and care :-) It looks terrible and should be reformatted somehow to be more flexible or render separately elsewhere but using Wikidata and image preview placed here - no? Zblace (talk) 11:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This TABLE needs... 

message: Wikidot is still running and it offers wiki hosting. Am I wrong? Pier4r (talk) 22:35, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, its still running. I've considered submitting an article about it before, because it should in theory meet all the guidelines AceiusIO (talk) 04:53, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikidot 

message: @Pppery: I believe Miraheze should be included in this list per the three conditions listed on Wikipedia:Notability (web)#If the content is not notable. It is of significance to this list. Otherwise, usefulness of this article is questionable at best; if we went through a small spring clean-up, Socialtext and Nuclino should be gone from the table at first glance - one is defunct (for its successor: WP:NOTINHERITED) and the other relies on promo sources in its article. Not to mention we're comparing wiki-focused wiki farms with collaboration software... -Vipz (talk) 20:32, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been discussed numerous times in the archives. The consensus was that only entries with their own articles get listed, and Miraheze is not special enough to break the rules. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of [[Draft:Miraheze|Miraheze]] / comparing wiki farms with collaboration software
Talk:Goodwood railway station

message: There is no description of what changed in 1955, and it is not clear which tracks/platforms changed in 1995 due to standardisation. The article is also not clear how or if platform allocation changed with either the rail underpass or the electrification of the Seaford railway tracks. --Scott Davis Talk 11:21, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification needed
Talk:Flippity floppity floo

message: This is my favourite page on WP.  Please don't delete it.  --JGGardiner 05:02, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is someone threatening to delete it? :) -Andrew 16:42, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really but the creator said s/he wasn't sure if it should be in the comments.  --JGGardiner 17:04, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's me :), I'm still not sure that it should be, but I won't be the one to request it's deletion.. I will change the redirect to Hizzy though, since that's more appropriate than redirecting to house. -Andrew 17:36, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Oh well thanks for making it then.  I thought the redirect to house worked great but either way is fine with me.  --JGGardiner 20:11, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Seaking (Pokémon)

message: Ok, the protection part is understandable, now that the humble Azumao has fallen victim to becoming a fad... however, that's no reason for 90 percent of the article to be missing. ^_^' someone wanna slide that back in?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.21.221 (talk • contribs) 
:Around here should be good to revert to, admins...—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 03:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Marianne Mathy

message: The biography in the references section has HEAPS of information in it.  I invite someone to write a decent article based on it. John Dalton 05:14, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1972 European Cup Winners' Cup final

message: I think this section needs the attention of some non-Rangers fans, and also a really good copyedit. --John (talk) 21:10, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality of aftermath section 

message: Hello! Is it possible to add a file which contains the starting line-ups for both teams in the final?.
--88.91.100.244 (talk) 15:03, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starting line-ups
Talk:Utah v. Evans

message: Utah argued that, although the census statute allowed the Bureau to use sampling to address under-counting, hot-deck imputation did not fit the statute's concept of sampling
The text of the judgement seems to contradict this: 'Utah brought this suit... claiming that the Bureau's use of "hot-deck imputation" violates 13 U. S. C. §195, which prohibits use of "the statistical method known as 'sampling,' "'. 
As far as I can tell from the judgement, Utah's argument was that the statute forbade use of sampling for determining apportionment of representatives, and the court ruled against Utah because 'Bureau imputation in the year 2000 census differs from sampling in several critical respects'. --GenericBob (talk) 04:08, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sampling permitted?
Talk:Scalar–tensor theory

message: The clearly appropriate name for this page is "Scalar-tensor theory." I think it might be equally reasonable to merge it to Brans-Dicke theory, but I'd like to hear people's opinions on the latter before I make a move to do anything. –Joke 21:50, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved. —Nightstallion (?) 08:16, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: I think "Scalar-tensor theory" is indeed the appropriate name. Now about merging and Brans-dicke´s theory:
Actually, the Brans-Dicke theory is a kind of scalar-tensor theory, as it is a special case of the older theory of Jordan (which Brans and Dicke did not know) (that´s why the better name for Brans-Dicke theory is Jordan-Brans-Dicke (JBD) theory.Brans and Dicke came to the postulation of the scalar field for explaining Mach´s principle within gravitation, Jordan following geometrical thoughts (in his Projective Geometry theory). Nevertheless, Jordan´s theory becomes Brans-Dicke´s, if energy conservation has to be given.
However, although the JBD theory is a scalar-tensor theory, I cannot say that every such theory goes through JBD at some moment. The JBD theories are usually defined as possessing massless scalar fields, while a scalr-tensor theory might as well possess massive scalar fields. This should then have consequences in the coupling of the scalar field with the curvature scalar (for physical means). This might as well change the behaviour for a massless limit of the theory (now only as a thought and not saying anything neither about the physical reasons it might have nor about the physicality of such limit). That´s why I think, it should not be necessary to merge the sites (and if yes, then many changes should be made for not losing information). And as I have seen, there are many sites in Wikipedia that are alike but not merged and that might not have to be merged, maybe for purposes of completeness. Important is that the pages are well-linked and that the reader can make himself an idea of how the tree looks like.
N.M.B.R.Nbez 11:25, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Brans-Dicke theory]]

message: I count citations up to number 8 but I see 9 references and these are not numbered?  What gives? TonyMath (talk) 12:08, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: References are not numbered?
Talk:Carrington, North Dakota

message: On Halloween 2005 this place was litter with smashed pumpkins on streets .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.178.194.75 (talk) 05:58, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halloween 2005 Incident 