lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Stephen V Báthory

message: Good use of references for a relatively short article. I really have nothing to suggest for this article. Good work overall. ErleGrey 01:00, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA pass

message: Was this guy related to Erzebet Bathory? (Or "Elizebeth" if you prefer the Anglosized version of the name)
:As it says in the Aftermath section: yes. --Thus Spake Anittas 11:38, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  One Question 

message: I wonder how much of the information contained in here is relevant to this specific Bathory. Is there any clearer information about the descendants of "the son of Dracula"? And why are they indirect descendants of the Corvinus family? Str1977 (smile back) 21:05, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Specific or Bathory-general

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe, following the changes detailed above, the article now meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, EyeSereneTALK 11:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps (Pass)

message: Why is it that István Báthory´s name has to be changed into Stephen? Does that person not have the right to be called by his real name? And what would you think if George Washington was changed int György Vasington? Please give the due resptect to all persons and stop changing them because of some shallow reasons.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.40.39.126 (talk) 20:56, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why altering the real name of a person? 

message: No infobox, unreferenced parts. This is no longer up to modern GA standards. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:22, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getting long in the tooth for a GA
Talk:Primary Rate Interface

message: what is a pri --22:22, 27. Feb. 2007 70.21.121.18
:As discribed in the article. Or what else do you mean? --Uweschwoebel 21:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think he means, what does the acronym it stand for? I see it referred to as Primary Rate ISDN Family Guy Guy (talk) 02:35, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

text: There are in fact 32 channels: Channel 0 is used for framing and synhronisation, channels 1 through 15 are B channels, channel 16 is the D channel, and channels 17 through 31 are the remaining B channels. 32 times 64 kbit/s equals 2.048 Mbit/s. See E-carrier for more info. JanCeuleers 15:25, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

text: A PRI is a specific type of T1 or E1. Bellhead (talk) 22:20, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

text: More accurately, a PRI is a service provided on a T1 or E1 and frequently (but incorrectly) considered to be one and the same with the T1/E1. Bellhead (talk) 15:08, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Early question

message: When using PRIs for voice, they can be stacked together. For example, you can have one PRI with 23 B channels and 1 D channel and the second have 24 B channels, using the one D channel for signaling. If you had four PRIs, it wouldn't be uncommon to have two 23B+1D PRIs and two 24B PRIs - two D channels for redundancy.  205.154.230.126 (talk) 01:33, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that this is at least touched upon in Primary rate interface#Fractional T1. — Dgtsyb (talk) 09:29, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

text: See Non-Facility_Associated_Signalling Tomgreeny (talk) 15:39, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

text: So where was the error?—Dgtsyb (talk) 16:36, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not always 23B+1D
Talk:Xırdalan

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  Vaticidalprophet 10:46, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Xırdalan →  – WP:COMMONNAME and WP:UE. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jabrayil#Requested_move_4_October_2020. Thepharoah17 (talk) 10:27, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 April 2021
Talk:Tawfiq Ziad

message: Hi RolandR! Nice to see you. Thanks for the wikilinks. :) Tiamut 22:23, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And it's nice to be here. But I'm afraid I've brought the stalker with me too, and s/he is continually vandalising this article. RolandR 12:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Omega Code

message: I haven't seen this movie myself, however even a non-viewer can tell that the everything from the grammar to the POV writing in several place.  Places such as the movie being "considered one of the worst movies ever" w/o providing so much as one citation to back this claim--and considering the wealth of bad movies available it seems ludicrous to assume that this one is the worst hands down--are obvious violations of the NPOV.  I erased that part, however there are many other places in this article that require editing just to even become a trustworthy stub.Rocdahut 08:01, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Major Revision 

message: I have found an article from Christianity Today (2000) that speaks of a $40 million lawsuit over the movie, yet there is no mention of this in the article.Prometheus-X303- 08:28, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lawsuit 

message: Ummm . . . .
Though I'm not a fan of this movie (to put it mildly), I have to wonder how anyone could consider a blurb of about 850 - 900 words "too long"?  The movies The Robe (1953) and The Ten Commandments (1956) each have over 2000 words devoted to plot summary.  (Then again, the entry for The Greatest Story Ever Told has none at all!)  Is there a hint of either cinematic elitism or anti-monotheism here?  Not necessarily, but I think this film, its subject and its supporters ought to be given an even-handed treatment....
173.219.118.86 (talk) 04:53, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too Long ?  Excessively Detailed ?
Talk:Johann Amerbach

message: The entry for Johann Amerbach includes this sentence:   "At the Sorbonne in Paris where he graduated with B.A. in 1461 and a Master of Arts, in 1962."   That last date, 1962, surely must be 1462, during the century when he lived. 100.15.104.13 (talk) 21:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks, adapted Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:08, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Johann Amerbach entry
Talk:Dante Marioni

message: If anyone has input or suggestions to improve this page it would be greatly appreciated.Klallen 22:27, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Lasallian universities and colleges in the United States

message: I shall be renaming the template from Template:Lasallian Colleges and Universities to Template:Lasallian universities and colleges in the United States for the following reasons:
* Wikipedia naming conventions: "Do not capitalize second and subsequent words unless the title is a proper noun."
* In a recent CfD discussion on colleges and universities, it was agreed that, "where both "universities" and "colleges" are used, they will be put in that order."
* At present, only educational institutions located within the United States are included. Expanding the template to include all Lasallian universities and colleges worldwide would probably make it too bulky.
* As per category naming conventions, education-related country-specific names should use "in country" rather than "of country". It is assumed that this also applies to templates.
Ayla 09:33, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming
Talk:Walter Ruttmann

message: It is curious that the German Wikipedia entry for Ruttmann conflicts with the information here. Particularly in relation to his work during Nazi Germany. 
And, seriously -- no mention of Metropolis?  How lame and pointless could this article be?
Just another wikiwasteoftime.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.141.212.254 (talk) 18:49, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think we need a citation for the statement that Ruttmann was an assistant to Riefenstahl on "Triumph of the Will." That's a big statement, too big to be unsourced. On the page for the film, it is stated that he (Ruttmann) was originally going to direct the film, but Hitler didn't like his version of it, and convinced Riefenstahl to direct (also not cited on that page, it appears). In any case, this statement should probably either be backed up or removed.
2601:14F:8300:C240:EDD1:F200:91EC:DDE6 (talk) 22:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ruttmann assistant on "Triumph of the Will" citation
Talk:Walther Kadow

message: German Wikipedia claims - citing the following three sources: Lew Alexandrowitsch Besymenski: Die letzten Notizen von Martin Bormann. Ein Dokument und sein Verfasser. DVA, Stuttgart 1974, ISBN 3-421-01660-7, S. 300 ().Hugo Beer: Moskaus As im Kampf der Geheimdienste: die Rolle Martin Bormanns in der deutschen Führungsspitze. 2. Aufl. Verlag Hohe Warte, Pähl 1984, , S. 19 () Verlagsprofil beachten, LudendorfferKarin Orth: Die Konzentrationslager-SS, 2013, S. 110. - that he was born on January 29th 1900 in Hagenow. This would make him 23 years old at the age of his death which differs wildly from the age he has according to this article. What's true? Hobbitschuster (talk) 17:45, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date
Talk:Deep column station

message: This article is basically a translation of :ru:Колонная станция глубокого заложения.  As such it's heavily Russian-centered.  Also, it might benefit from a merger with Shallow column station. --Reuben 01:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translated from Russian 
Talk:Ursula Buchfellner

message: I believe Deanna Baker, Miss May 1972, was the first Playboy Playmate to appear in Penthouse, in August 1977, as Rebecca Davenport.  Refer to:  venusobservations.com    Ms. Baker became alienated from Playboy as a result of her appearance in Penthouse.  This is all anecdotal.  The author of venusobservations.com also mentions Ursula Buchfellner as having appeared in Penthouse after her Playmate pictorial.
JeffW77 (talk) 03:00, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Republic (United Kingdom)

message: Non-notable.  What does this society do?  Does it have events, members? What is it?--Couter-revolutionary 22:37, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not being childish.  I am wondering if it does anything? Does it? You ought know...--Couter-revolutionary 20:15, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Yes and I'm head of the "Campaign to Make Counter-Revolutionary Wikipedia Head of State", is my organisation notable.  Clearly not.  What makes this one notable. --Couter-revolutionary 20:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

text: At the end of the day it is, of course, up to the given Admin. to take the decision, I have, however, seen articles fulfill those requirements be deleted.--Couter-revolutionary 20:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

message: This is a topic of very significant consequence.  People are advocating the replacement of the British monarchy with a republic, talk that would have gotten them spedily into prison in the nineteenth century and much of the twentieth century.  The issue of republic versus monarchy is one that stocked the conservative ancien regime reaction against liberalism in Britain and on the European continent throughout the nineteenth century.
It is rather remarkable that editors are hurling charges such as sock puppet.
This organization is a bona fide organization with dozens of supporters among political and cultural figures in British society. The BBC had given reference to it in a series of articles in 2003. Dogru144 17:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Serious article

message: This makes no sense: a republic that is linked with the United Kingdom. Dogru144 00:03, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Farcical, oxymoronic title
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of screen capture software

message: I feel that there is a lot of confusion involving this AfD. Specificly:
# This is a double AfD so Deletes, Keeps, and Neutrals relate to two different articles. I am not an expert on this policy, so someone please correct me if I am wrong, but I believe it is possible to voice an opinion to Keep one article while Delete-ing the other. In any case it is important to be aware that your opinion is being applied to either, neither, or both articles.
# This is not a vote. See Wikipedia:Deletion_policy: "A deletion debate is not a popular vote, but a way of obtaining editors' views as to whether an article meets policy guidelines or not".
I sure don't envy the administrator that is going have to sort through this mess. (Requestion 22:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification
Talk:Bogomil Font

message: hi there - just adding a page describing Sigtryggur Baldursson's alter ego, Bogomil Font. he is red linked in the american wiki as well as this wiki: 
hopefully this is clear ? as he was the drummer for the Sugarcubes, he meets wiki criteria for notability.
--Bifftar 22:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of The O.C. characters

message: Oliver isn't mentioned in this article at all. 14:09, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oliver Trask 

message: It has been suggested that Charlotte Morgan be merged into this page, and I thought I would try to see if a consensus can be reached on whether to merge or not. I believe there has been much discussion on merging characters on other TV shows, and I think the main thing was to establish notablity, and write from an real-world perspective. There are references that could be used , , , but if it is to stay in the long term it will need more than just plot summary. I think as it stands it should be merged, but would like other peoples opinion. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 23:15, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: , I have now merged her into this article. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 09:48, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Michael Sladek

message: At a first glance, it appears that a merge with Ursula Sladek might be in order, their notability seems sufficiently linked that a single article on the both of them might be more encyclopedic. But not having delved into every possible source, I'll leave that for future editors' consideration.  --joe deckertalk to me 19:49, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ursula Sladek won a Goldman Environmental Prize recently and so is notable in her own right. Johnfos (talk) 20:37, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with that rationale and it's sourced enough.  I was more asking the question of whether Michael was independently notable, and even if he was, whether most of their story was so intertwined that the biographies were better written together.  I didn't immediately see a source for Michael's prize, and what news coverage I found in a quick search *only* had him included in the context of Ursula. But it sounds like you've looked at it and think two articles is a better editorial decision, and I'll accept that, I'm just passing through trying to deal with unsourced articles. Cheers, --joe deckertalk to me 21:13, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge? 
Talk:Sweating Bullets (song)

message: >> "The song was one of the many songs deemed inappropriate after the September 11th terrorist attacks." Deemed innapropriate for what? Can someone either fix this statement (And add what it is 'Innapropriate' for) or delete it entirely. XBurningAlive (talk)
:...deemed inappropriate per the 2001 Clear Channel memorandum as having "questionable lyrics".  It should be noted that this was not an outright ban to prevent Clear Channel stations from playing the song, but was merely a suggestion.  I actually think this may be worth re-adding to the article.  Hoof Hearted (talk) 20:33, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Innapropriate?
Talk:Real Politics Union

message: :A special colour variation of St George's Cross
Why does the article say this?  Was it a documented, public decision by the party to produce something that was "a special colour variation of St George's Cross" (whatever that means), or did the editor who wrote that just think it was?  Heraldically, this is not any kind of variation of St George's cross, because the colours are different: just because two designs have a single honourable ordinary in common doesn't make them variations of one another. The Wednesday Island (talk) 16:59, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes they wrote in their party statute that their flag is blue St George's Cross with white edge on black background. In polish here http://upr.polityczne.net/Statut_UPR  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.16.109.58 (talk) 00:25, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The flag 

message: Is that supposed to read "support for NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization)"?  I didn't realise the US/Canada/Mexico free trade agreement was such a hot topic in European politics!99.237.223.144 (talk) 12:02, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Support for NAFTA?

message: to Patia  polityczna i grupa i klub od 2023 października 6 stworzyło patia Polski lider Maciej ołyniuk 5.173.198.43 (talk) 12:41, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  PZL Tytus eslemoce
Talk:Frederick Buckley Newell

message: *There is a decent photograph of Rev. Newell in the January 7th, 1956 edition of The Hartford Courant newspaper on page 9.  I do not have permission to reprint it here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kacela (talk • contribs) 23:32, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Otmar Issing

message: There exist three independent sources which don't say the same things about the Goethe University: 
# "chairman of the board of trustees of the House of Finance at Goethe University"(according to centralbanking.com)
# "Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the House of Finance, Goethe University Frankfurt (2007)" (according to som.yale.edu)
# "Chairman Kuratorium House of Finance, Goethe University Frankfurt; Honorary Professorships at the University of Würzburg (1991) and the Goethe University Frankfurt (2007)" (berggruen.org).
Moreover, all of them mention a "honorary professorship" at the University of Würzburg, whilst solely the first two talk about a "Chair of Economics" in the same academy. 
For other aspects, the cited sources seem to be WP:reliable for the current article.Philosopher81sp (talk) 21:50, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goethe University Frankfurt and University of Würzburg,
Talk:Durs Grünbein

message: The stub DURS GRUNBEIN should of course be merged with this article, since GRUNBEIN is a mis-spelling which must be corrected. (Klaus rabe 19:08, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: this article requires some work ... I will start with the German, itself an unimpressive article.
G. Robert Shiplett 13:06, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  major poet with fine English translation
Talk:Georg H. Schnell

message: I've sent Bartholome the following message:
Your additions may be well-intentioned, but there is hardly any point in copying the exhaustive IMDb filmography without carefully wikifying it (italics, internal links, etc.). I suggest you either do the whole job or leave the article as it is: there is an external link to Schnell's IMDb entry anyway. 3. Titanic (1943) (uncredited) .... Aktionär Morrison (just an example) would absolutely need an internal link, and you would have to plough through Titanic (which currently redirects to RMS Titanic), Titanic (disambiguation), and List of films about the RMS Titanic to finally arrive at Titanic (1943 film), which would be the correct link.
<KF> 07:49, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "This German biographical article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it."
Talk:Erwin Böhme

message: 100% cited from textual sources owned by editor.Georgejdorner (talk) 23:05, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total rewrite performed.  

message: Additional texts acquired. Rewritten, with illustrations added.Georgejdorner (talk) 17:52, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another rewrite 

message: The first paragraph in the "Death in action" section is cited to Jackson (1998), pp. 26–27. However, no such book is listed in the article. Could it be that the reference should be the book by "Jackson, Robert (2006). Army Wings: A History of Army Air Observation Flying 1914–1960. Pen & Sword Books. ISBN 978-1-84415-380-0"? MisterBee1966 (talk) 08:15, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing reference
Talk:Elsa Einstein

message: Does anyone know what the "Painfull illness " Elsa Died from? Or, was it the heart and kidney problems she suffered in late life?
Luke Farrelly-Spain (talk) 16:21, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A "Painfull Illness " 

message: Why does it say the date of marriage was in 1917 on his citizenship papers? -- Zblewski|talk  15:02, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriage date 

message: So is Elsa who people refer to when they aphoristically comment that "Albert Einstein was a brilliant man who was married to a simple woman"...noting that his first wife was quite well-educated?    --The_Iconoclast (talk) 08:24, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Simple Woman 

message: I know Albert and Elsa are first cousins via Pauline Koch and Fanny Koch being sisters but they are also second cousins via their fathers. Albert's paternal grandfather Abraham Einstein is the brother of Elsa's paternal grandfather Rudolph Einstein thus Albert's father Hermann is the first cousin of Elsa's father Raphael. Albert and Elsa are the great grandchildren of Rupert Einstein and Rebecca Obernauer. --User:Meteor  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.110.195.254 (talk) 16:49, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Albert and Elsa's fathers are first cousins
Talk:Philipp Stauff

message: The article calls him "German/Austrian". Is this because he was born in what was then the Austro-Hungarian Empire and emigrated to Germany at some point, prior to it looks like from the article no later than 1910. If that is so he would seem to fit in :Category:Austro-Hungarian emigrants to Germany.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:34, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Note in passing: that would now be :Category:Emigrants from Austria-Hungary to Germany. – Fayenatic London 20:27, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  German/Austrian
Talk:Aspull

message: The link to britishsurvey.org is dead, or rather it points to a domain park  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.155.193.120 (talk) 23:59, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: = All about Aspull  