lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Passion of the Hood Christ

message: This is not nonsense. It is an album. wikisoul 00:10, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Gaetano Brunetti

message: Moving here some (unsourced) content that appears dated (and therefore somewhat arbitrary):
The dearth of modern editions of Brunetti's compositions helped limit the number of recordings of his work (exceptions included a collection of three symphonies performed by Concerto Köln on the Capriccio record label and a group of string quartets performed by the Schuppanzigh Quartet for CPO). 86.180.70.107 (talk) 19:28, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved content
Talk:Georg Christoph Wagenseil

message: Apparently he also composed a Concerto for Trombone, if there's any place to include that in here. Hermione1980 16:00, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trombone concerto

message: Italian WP has him born on 8 June.  And the 5th edition of Grove says 15 January, not 29 January.  Anyone know where these alternative histories come from?  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 04:10, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: AAMOF he was baptized on 30 January 1715. But to correct Wikipedia on this would be a hopeless enterprise.--Suessmayr (talk) 15:12, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not sure what you mean by that, Herr Suessmayr.  Do we know for a fact that he was born 29 January, or just that he was baptised 30 January?   --  Jack of Oz [Talk] 22:18, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth
Talk:Georg Matthias Monn

message: The following sentence
We still have absolutely no proof that the Johann Georg Mann born in 1717 is the same person as the Georg Matthias Monn who died in 1750
is highly confusing and a very bad logical fallacy. Did anybody ever claim or suggest that Johann and Georg might be the same person? Even stranger - was Johann Georg Mann born in 1717?
This statement is one of the poorest in the entire wikipedia... URGENT REVISION suggested... Tang Wenlong (talk) 17:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:LOL (video game)

message: It's called LOL in America.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.112.145.70 (talk) 00:18, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:George Ballard (biographer)

message: Yes, the list of women treated in his book should be merged. there is no basis at all for a separate article giving the table of contents of a book. Although often in a case like this an article could be written about the book, however--and then   this could be part of that article instead--but he wrote only one book, and the merge under his name seems obviously appropriate.    DGG ( talk ) 19:15, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: merging the list
Talk:George Booth (pirate)

message: I've found a number of conflicting reports on his death. When I was working on John Bowen I found a source that said he was killed in 1700, and Bowen replaced him as captain.. however, this article states (and some preliminary looking around online) seems to have his date of death at 1710.
Any help would be gratefully received! shas (talk) 21:13, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death..?
Talk:George Cartwright (trader)

message: ===Revisions===
*Rework so that does it not copy Story 2003 [1983]
*Check facts against Stopp 2009 and Story 2003 [1983]
*Cartwright was not primarily an explorer, and trader may not be the best way to describe him either, e.g. he was an army officer and a merchant in the Newfoundland trade.
*Add summary paragraph at top.
*edit: "John" --> "John Cartwright" 
*Caubvick -- spin off into her own article b/c  a diversion in the Cartwright biography.
*Remove passage quoting Poetical Epistle that appears to be original research.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SockeyeSam (talk • contribs) 22:37, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[To Do]] 

message: *Rework so that does it not copy Story 2003 [1983]
*Check facts against Stopp 2009 and Story 2003 [1983]
*Cartwright was not primarily an explorer, and trader may not be the best way to describe him either, e.g. he was an army officer and a merchant in the Newfoundland trade.
*Add summary paragraph at top.
*edit: "John" --> "John Cartwright" 
*Caubvick -- spin off into her own article b/c  a diversion in the Cartwright biography.
*Remove passage quoting Poetical Epistle that appears to be original research.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SockeyeSam (talk • contribs) 22:37, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Revisions

message: *May not have been the eldest brother of the family.
*Engraving -- add that it is based on an oil painting.
*Confirm date of Brevetting.
*Check date of half-pay.
SockeyeSam (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 20:47, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Details

message: There are a few spots of what looks like original research here. In particular
*the part about Cartwright's love of Labrador until his death (which I agree with, but it doesn't have a citation.)
"He had an unparalleled love for Labrador until his death, writing: Fish, Fowl and Ven'son, now our tables grace / Roast Beaver too, and e'ery Beast of Chase. / Luxurious living this! who'd wish for more? / Were QUIN alive, he'd haste to Labrador"
*the part of Dominick Kinnien entering with John Grimes (which I largely agree with, but there are a few problems with this claim, e.g. by then Kinnien was working for another merchant, not Cartwright. The main thing is, a citation could sort all this out. It might be discussed in Cadigan 2009.)
"This came about when his servant Dominick Kinnien defected to join the crew of the Bostonian John Grimes."
*For the time being, I will rework these sections.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SockeyeSam (talk • contribs) 21:37, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Research?
Talk:Planera aquatica

message: 11/2/2020 
This page is pretty bare bones. I think we could copy a lot of information from here: https://plants.ces.ncsu.edu/plants/planera-aquatica/
I'd suggest adding some more photographs, more descriptions, maybe even how to tell it apart from true elms. I'll see about adding a few things.  
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I added several details on the Species water elm. Since it's the only species in the genus, I think adding the information here instead of a new page is suitable. 
Future additions:
Pictures of flowers, fresh fruit (when green), or better pictures of leaves (had to use a personal picture). Also could someone cite the USDA-NRCS (citation 3) on the fruit picture? For the life of me I could not get the correct citation. There may be some grammar or syntax issues, please correct them as you see fit. Let me know if there are any problems with my update.
--Anonkiwi (talk) 18:53, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvements
Talk:George Dance the Elder

message: I've removed a few of the buildings mentioned in the article.
St Botolph Aldersgate is certainly not by Dance, having been built in  1788, well after his death. St Luke, Old Street now seems pretty firmly attributed to James and Hawksmoor.  St Botolph Bishopsgate is a more complex matter. The design is generally ascribed to one Joseph Gold or Gould. According to more some more recent books, Gold was Dance's father-in-law.  I suppose its on this basis that some sources e,g. Jones and Woodward's "Guide to the Architecture of London" say it's a joint work by Gold and Dance. But the "Buildings of England" although mentioning their relationship attributes it to Gold alone, and I've followed that line and removed the mention of it from the article. The St Luke's hospital in Old Streeet was built in 1781 by Dance the Younger; its predecssor was in Moorfields, bit I can't find reference to an architect. Ruskinmonkey (talk) 09:54, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attributions
Talk:George Edwards (naturalist)

message: The text said he was born at West Ham, the infobox that he was born at Stratford. I have tried to overcome the conflict, but perhaps not in the best way. Someone who knows the area could probably do better.   Athel cb (talk) 13:53, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Your changes look good. - Aa77zz (talk) 14:55, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: West Ham or Stratford
Talk:Christian Social People's Service

message: I recently changed the page, adding more content and more references. The initial page mentioned the Christlich-soziale Reichsvereinigung (Christian Social Reich Association), which I have removed for clarity, as the only two groups that I have seen regularly mentioned in the founding of the CSVD are the Christian socials and the CVD. That being said, the Bonhoeffer source mentions how the Christian Social Reich Association joined with the CVD to form the CSVD. 
I am of the strong opinion that the Christian Social Reich Association is just a name for the Christian social faction within the DNVP. From Google Translate, I could gather that this Source mentions it was formed in August 1928, and included protestant's both inside and outside of the DNVP. However, the source is in German, so I can't say this for sure. The German Wiki mentions that many of the DHV members were part of the Christian Social Reich Association. This seems to support my claim.
Furthermore, Patch (1985, p. 144) mentions a non-partisan "Christian Social Federation" where Patch may have translated Reichsvereinigung as federation. This group was internal to the DNVP, but formed a truce with the CVD, which seems like what the badly translated JSTOR source mentioned. Furthermore, in Patches sources for the federation he does mention the Christlich-soziale Reichsvereinigung.
If someone can read German and clarify the relationship between the Christian Social Reich Association and Christian Socials, that would be great. DishevelledD (talk) 13:04, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Changes
Talk:George Gordon, Lord Haddo

message: I'm guessing John Gordon, the second admiral listed, was the captain the HMS America, but not other specifics are provided in the source; the diplomat is of interest because this was a reconnaissance mission concerning the status/value of the region in the Oregon Question.  So it could haev een him also; the source only says that he was the brother of the Lord Aberdeen that was then Prime Minister; so it's one of these lads.  Anyone have any idea who?Skookum1 (talk) 17:13, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see it's already been modified, but for the record, it was Hon. John Gordon. Choess (talk) 13:31, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Which son? - Robert, John or George?
Talk:George Horne (bishop)

message: Though this is only a stub, I must query the assertion that he suffered cruelty as a child. From parent or teacher? Mental or physical? Abnormal for the times? What are the sources, and how reliable are they? Also, is it logical to equate childhood suffering with academic achievement? The Lawless One (talk) 16:08, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since removed. Clifford Mill (talk) 17:35, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Query

message: There is a bit of a problem with the referencing here. Basically none of the refs in the article give the details about Maria, the unmarried daughter. Charles Matthews (talk) 07:29, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Reference added. Clifford Mill (talk) 17:36, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Family
Talk:United Nations peacekeeping missions involving Pakistan

message: * UN troops 'traded gold for guns'
Some mention of this matter should be included in the article.  ·:·Will Beback  ·:· 10:22, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Democratic Republic of Congo

message: When reading the article about Pakistani efforts in Somalia and Mogadishu, it is blatantly obvious that the author is in huge favor of the Pakistani armed forces present there and sometimes over exaggerates and glorifies the events and actions of the Pakistani military.
For example, when speaking about the Battle of Mogadishu the author does factually mention the role of Pakistani armor in coming into the militia-controlled portion of the city and aiding US troops in their exfiltration, however, the author embellishes their role-
"Had it not been for the courage, valour and steadfastness of the Pakistani soldiers, the rescue operation could not have succeeded and the trapped US soldiers might have perished."
Pakistani armor did come to the aid, and certainly rescue, of American forces, however they did not perform anything more than what was asked from their job. They performed no extraordinary action. The article leads the reader to think that the Pakistani armor performed super-humanly and went above and beyond the call of duty. 
Furthermore, when the author writes about the ambush of Pakistani soldiers during a weapon inspection, the article again seems embellished and takes a more narrative than factual form. For Example-
"The ambushers were using children and women as human shields to prevent being fired back while the road-blocks they had set up made Pakistanis withdrawal difficult. Though taken by surprise and totally exposed, the courageous blue beret Pakistanis fought their way back taking full care that the children and women protecting the attackers remained unharmed"
The aforementioned quote is clearly biased and partisan. 
By no means do i mean to water-down the efforts of the Pakistani military and i do believe they did their job to their fullest extent during both the ambush and the Battle of Mogadishu, however, i think that the article should be revised in accordance and respect to article rules on position, bias, etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.111.239.58 (talk) 01:54, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Mogadishu 

message: I am a bit concerned by the use of the term "cherished" in the article. It seems a bit POV to me, but I'd like alternate opinions here to guess if I'm alone or not.--Nadirali نادرالی (talk) 01:08, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of the term "cherished" 

message: "In recognition of PAKBAT efforts, a school was named, Pakistan School." this will be removed until a source can be provided DrWineBerry (talk) 12:22, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can't find any source confirming that a school was named after PAKBAT,will be removing it
Talk:George Sorocold

message: I have added a note of the reference work used for this entry. May I recommend importance be raised to mid, as one of the first national civil engineers. Chevin 16:54, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: According to Cooper, Sorocold was born in Lancashire but the website listed at the bottom says "George Sorocold was born in Derby in 1668. His father lived at Eggington and Derby." 86.141.119.50 (talk) 17:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Oxford National Biography, the Wikipedia article is right. Chevin (talk) 19:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry no it isnt Chevin (talk) 15:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Research need
Talk:George Warde

message: Who is this article about, George Warde or James Wolfe? Died in 1759 or 1803? GregorB (talk) 16:13, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now removed all mention of Wolfe Dormskirk (talk) 22:21, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: This article has confused two General George Wardes, uncle (1725-1803) and nephew (1760-1830).
The uncle, who this article is about, was a childhood friend of Gen. Wolfe and served as Commander-in-Chielf, Ireland etc.
The nephew married Charlotte Madan and lived at Clyne Castle, Swansea (then called Woodland Castle).
I have removed the parts about the nephew.
Sources include:
Burke's Landed Gentry lists both George Wardes : https://ukga.org/browse.php?action=ViewRec&DB=33&bookID=221&pagecount=1634
Diary of Lewis Weston Dillwyn, of Swansea, who is in a legal dispute with Gen. Warde in October 1817, 14 years after the uncle died : https://www.swansea.ac.uk/media/1VOL-1817-8.pdf
Death of Gen. Warde in his 71st year, from The Cambrian newspaper, June 1830 : https://newspapers.library.wales/view/3327260/3327263/15/
Vexald (talk) 09:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion of two people
Talk:George XI of Kartli

message: George XI of Kartli  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.225.43.204 (talk) 18:17, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  George XI of Kartli 

message: * "Shah Abbas solidified the nexus with its royal house by giving Constantin Mirza's sister in marriage to Prince Hamzah Mirza. A century later, Gurgin Khan, the Georgian commander-in-chief of the Safavid army, married a daughter of Ja'far Quli Khan of Sistan in an union designed to strenghten ties between Isfahan and that remote area." -- Matthee, Rudi. (2012) Persia in Crisis: Safavid Decline and the Fall of Isfahan. I.B.Tauris. pp. 146-147
- LouisAragon (talk) 17:16, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparently married three times 
Talk:Gerasim Izmailov

message: Perhaps there should be a Category of Articles where the name in the title is spelled differently in the body of the text. --Haruo (talk) 05:43, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling?

message: The link goes to the modern chessplayer, rather than any historical figure. Anders Sandberg (talk) 18:58, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dmitry Bocharov?
Talk:March 1933 German federal election

message: The Nazis did not "seize" power on January 30, 1933.  It was given to them pursuant to the terms of the Weimar Convention.  As Volume 1 of "World at War" points out, they had never expected to achieve power legally, and for a time they were a bit unsure how to act.  Alexander Springstea (talk) 01:34, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nazis Did Not "Seize" Power on January 30, 1933 

message: Can it be detailed when and for what reasons the Reichstag went from 584 seats in the Nov 1932 election to 647 seats at the March 1933 election, and whose oversaw/organized this expansion of the parliament? Maybe be a pretty benign reason typical of parliaments with variable numbers of seats, but also possible that it was a strategy for help the NSDAP, and it'd be helpful to include that in the "Background" section or make an "Electoral system" section to describe the change. Criticalthinker (talk) 02:52, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ahh, apparently the system up to that time connected seats to turnout; the larger the turnout, the more seats and vice versa. 60,000 votes equalled a seat, but even taking out invalid votes and those parties who didn't cross this threshold, I'm still getting 655 seats, so I'm not sure how this formula got them to 648 seats for this election. Anyone have any further insight into this? Criticalthinker (talk) 07:52, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It was indeed 60'000 votes for one seat in each constituency, then votes were pooled by constituency group and the quota was applied again, then votes were pooled nationally and the quota was applied one last time; however no more seats could be given at the national level than had already been allocated on the constituency and constituency group level, which may lead some smaller parties to lack seats. There's a lot more info on wahlen-in-deutschland.de. Julio974◆ (Talk-Contribs)  09:29, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I read that - and perhaps partly because of the translation - and understand none of the details beyond the constituency level. This was quite confusing. I'd be interested in seeing an example of one of the major parties, and how many seats the party one in each of the steps described. In any case, an "Electoral system" section needs to be added with someone who could explain this, as it's pretty typical for articles on elections, even historic ones. Criticalthinker (talk) 05:44, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion of the Reichstag
Talk:1928 German federal election

message: The following comment was copy-pasted from the article. —bender235 (talk) 10:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue weight 

message: This article describes the NSDAP (Nazis) as having lost 2 seats from the previous election, having declined from 14 seats to 12. The article on the previous election (November 1924) doesn't mention the NSDAP as having won ANY seats at all. Hmm, I see what happened. The NSFP (National Socialist Freedom Party) was effectively the Nazi party given that the Nazis were temporarily banned in 1924 as a result of the Beer Hall Putsch. Perhaps a footnote to that effect would be a good idea? I didn't know about that ban and only figured it out because it occurred to me that the NSDAP might have operated under a different name in a previous election; most people would not have thought of that and would be baffled by the (apparent) inconsistency.  
184.175.48.100 (talk) 19:29, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent data 

message: I'm not terribly good at formatting of this stuff and I forgot (sorry!) how to flag a page as having a weird format that needs improvement. The table of results and the 9 party sidebar thing on the right conflict so there's a massive white space. 
MaelstromOfSilence (talk) 21:46, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks ok to me. Do you happen to be using an old version of Internet Explorer or a very narrow screen? Number 57 21:58, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

text: ah, that'd be it. My monitor is 1024 x 720 or 800 x 600 (can't remember which). Sorry for the bother, and thanks. MaelstromOfSilence (talk) 22:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird formatting
Talk:November 1932 German federal election

message: The article states: "Although the Nazis remained the largest party they were still outnumbered by the Social Democrats and Communists."  How can the largest party be outnumbered?  Should this read "The Nazis remained the plurality party, but held fewer seats than the Social Democrats and Communists combined"?
:Being the largest party doesn't mean it has a 50+% majority. Your example had the same meaning as the actual sentence.-- OsirisV (talk) 18:05, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparent contradiction 

message: The article says "Although they emerged once more as the largest party by far, they had fewer seats than before" Why did their vote decline in Nov 1932 elections? 2A02:8084:6A22:4980:3801:11B6:DB51:157A (talk) 12:12, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Decline in Nazi vote. Why?

message: I'm not sure how to fix this but I noticed that the color coding for the Results chart is off. In the key the Center Party is coded as black when the chart shows Center Party seats in yellow. And German National People's Party is coded as blue when the chart shows them in black. The same issue is apparent at July 1932 German federal election and March 1933 German federal election (maybe elsewhere too but these are the ones I checked). Does anyone know how to fix this? Many thanks, Generalrelative (talk) 23:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Centralised discussion on this issue here. Number 57 23:34, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color coding for Results chart is off