Talk:Wright Glider

message: The merger of these articles was discussed on the 1902 Wright Glider talk page, but merger occured before completion of discussion, only 2 days after discussion began  and thus no consensus was reached. I have proposed that the page be split back into the sections that it was originally in (ie. one page per glider), rather than simply reverting, as I do not wish to start a reversion war. My posistion is that the merger should be reverted. --GW_Simulations 19:41, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Bad form that discussion wasn't completed, I guess, but I disagree that the merger should be reverted.  Unless and until there is significantly more substantial info for any of these aircraft, having a separate article for each is overkill.  I do think that perhaps the title should be changed to "Wright Gliders", though. SFT | Talk 03:21, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Disagree merger. As mentioned, not enough substantial information is present to warrant each glider having its own page. An example would be the North American B-25 Mitchell bomber, there were several different models (A,B,C,D,G,H,J being notable) and each had a different attribute. However, there is substantial information and specifications on each. Even in this case, there has not been a proposal to split the articles that I know of, and there is much more information for each page. But here, just not enough is present. Zchris87v 06:04, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

text: As a contributor to the Wright Brothers article (including the Glider section), I also think separate glider articles are not necessary. In fact, more information could be added about each glider in this article, without making the article very long. I think it's more convenient and useful for the reader/researcher to keep them all together in one article. DonFB 06:38, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

text: This article still needs a lot more content before thinking about splitting it. I'm going to pull the tag since this seems to be a dead issue for now.Dhaluza 03:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: why milhist, is it because mr. buffett said he should have shot them down? Accotink2 talk 20:21, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Wright Glider. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160512210401/http://www.vam.smv.org/pdfs/VAMHistoricAircraft.pdf to http://www.vam.smv.org/pdfs/VAMHistoricAircraft.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110516142717/http://www.soaringmuseum.org/collection.html to http://www.soaringmuseum.org/collection.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100408194749/http://nasm.si.edu/wrightbrothers/fly/1902/glider.cfm to http://www.nasm.si.edu/wrightbrothers/fly/1902/glider.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)