Talk:Quds Force

message: Should there be some mention of the recent allegations coming from the Bush Administration on the supply of weapons and arms to the sectarian war in Iraq? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.24.138.78 (talk) 16:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bush Administration Allegation of Weapon Supply

message: should the main name of article be quds force or qods force?Farmanesh 19:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I personally prefer "Quds" but the article was originally written with "Qods" so I figured I should not spell the word differently than the article's title. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.197.138.180 (talk) 02:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is really our call.  It was originally entitled Qods Force because up until several months ago, most of the media referred to it as that.  Now that it's been in the headlines the last month or two with regard to Iraq, it's been called Quds Force.  I wouldn't be opposed to a name change, because "Qods Force" is now getting 54,000 google hits, and "Quds Force" is getting 451,000. Joshdboz 02:34, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

text: If no one debates this I will change it in the next day or two. Joshdboz 17:56, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I have carried out the move and fixed all double redirects. Joshdboz 16:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Name: Quds or qods?

message: 71.197.138.180: To clarify why I tagged the page, lets review the wording and sources for the very first lines of the article. I hope we can then come to a general agreement, as to whether the page needs neutralization or not.
Lets look at the citations to see whether it passes for general policies of citing references on wikipedia WP:CITE:
# the sentence is stated as a fact; but refers to a weblog citing an American major general.
# the sentence is stated as a fact; but the reference say "Israeli security aide says", which omitted from the sentence. Still, the source fail to mention the Quds force.
# same as 2
# doesn't exist, a blank ref!
# the only good citation, stating "The Quds Force reports directly to the Supreme Leader of Iran Ayatollah Ali Khamenei."
# Same as 5: "The Quds Force reports directly to the Supreme Leader of Iran Ayatollah Ali Khamenei."
# cites an organization identified as terrorist by USA, CAN, EU... Hardly a Wikipedia:Attribution#Reliable_sources
So lets review. Among the cited statements, the only verifiable one in these few lines is "The Quds Force reports directly to the Supreme Leader of Iran Ayatollah Ali Khamenei." Hence the tag: Wikipedia:Accuracy dispute
Further more there are much WP:OR such as: the Quds Force mainly provides support to Shi‘ite groups like Hezbollah, the Mahdi Army, and the Badr Organization.
The case for neutrality is easily observable from above, and identification of NCRI as an amazingly POV term: "Iranian resistance group"
Seeing an incredible number of problems with these very few introductory sentences, I hope you admit there is a strong factuality and POV problem with this article, so that I can move with fixing the article without your reverts. Until the article has been fully repaired,  per wikipedia's tagging policies, the tags must remain.
P.S. I am not sure what are you referring to in your point {3}, I think you have mistaken me for another editor--Gerash77 05:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A review

message: Obviously it is inappropriate to remove tags when there is a dispute over the article's contents.  Also, at first glance, I can see that the 'al-Qaeda' section may be inappropriate.  While it is good that the attribution is clear, even presenting the speculation from a severely partisan magazine is undue weight as it is a dubious fringe theory.  I suggest that the section be removed.  The Behnam 23:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues 

message: Honestly, can people stop editing Wikipedia articles in the name of their special interest group.  I am so sick of Iranians, Greeks, or whatever editing article about their particular ethnic group out of ethnic pride.  Wikipedia is not about enhancing the image of anyone's "tribe."  Iran is a great country with an even greater history.  That doesn't mean ethnic Iranians who immigrated to the West have to be apologists for the current government and forign policy of the country.  If groups like the FAS say that the Quds Force makes contacts and organizes groups in countries, they have no particular bias (they are LIBERAL Americans who aren't nationalistic) and are a reputable source.  They are at least as reputable as Iranian regime sources.  Please be honest, not an advocate for your ethnic group.  Iran has a religious ideology and wants to support Shiite groups in Muslim countries.  They only reason you deny it is to protect your special interest group, even though the policies of the current Iranian regime doesn't say anything about the greatness of Iran.  If you want an example of what I am talking about: look at the article on the battle of Thermopylae in Wikipedia.  You see two interst groupsm Greeks and Persians going at it out of pride to make their ethnic group look "cool." Give it a rest!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.50.51.146 (talk) 00:20, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While we're on special interest groups, why not mention that the majority of foreign fighters entering Iraq are from Saudi Arabia? Then again, why not mention that the majority of foreign fighters entering Iraq are actually from half way around the world? How many foreign fighter groups do you think the United States is covertly and illegally working with? This isn't to advance any viewpoint, just to point out that most people don't even realize what their 'biases' are. Try to be aware of your own. --69.218.58.44 (talk) 19:11, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why don't we all just assume good faith?  If you see POV pushing, fix it. Joshdboz (talk) 00:31, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Heres the problem with Wikipedia. It can be manipulated. Get enough people flash mob editing a page and they get away with it, which is why the Zionists train up WP editors.  SaintAviator (talk) 06:20, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Special Interest Group Nonsense

message: do you say 
ipa kuːdz koods?  
ipa kʊdz, Kudz?  
ipa kʊʌdz Qu-udz?
156.154.61.4 (talk) 22:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: pronunciation?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Quds Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071016073937/http://albawaba.com:80/en/countries/Iraq/214878 to http://www.albawaba.com/en/countries/Iraq/214878
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:52, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Quds Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071016080723/http://www.guardian.co.uk:80/worldlatest/story/0,,-6937120,00.html to http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6937120,00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:44, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Quds Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070401125205/http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17175607/site/newsweek/? to http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17175607/site/newsweek/
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070112054829/http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2005/749/profile.htm to http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2005/749/profile.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071107053501/http://archives.cnn.com:80/2002/US/03/08/ret.war.facts/index.html to http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/03/08/ret.war.facts/index.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131202235621/http://www.pajhwok.com/en/2012/03/04/iran%E2%80%99s-revolutionary-guards-plotting-kill-me-kabuli to http://www.pajhwok.com/en/2012/03/04/iran%E2%80%99s-revolutionary-guards-plotting-kill-me-kabuli
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131203002447/http://www.pajhwok.com/en/2012/05/07/alleged-spies-say-iran%E2%80%99s-revolutionary-guards-trained-them to http://www.pajhwok.com/en/2012/05/07/alleged-spies-say-iran%E2%80%99s-revolutionary-guards-trained-them
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070114063237/http://www.concordmonitor.com:80/apps/pbcs.dll/article%3FAID%3D/20070112/REPOSITORY/701120382/1013/48HOURS to http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070112/REPOSITORY/701120382/1013/48HOURS
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070331061726/http://today.reuters.com:80/news/articlenews.aspx?type=worldNews to http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=worldNews&storyID=2007-01-14T120131Z_01_MAC638878_RTRUKOC_0_US-IRAQ.xml&pageNumber=1&imageid=&cap=&sz=13&WTModLoc=NewsArt-C1-ArticlePage1
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070331061726/http://today.reuters.com:80/news/articlenews.aspx?type=worldNews to http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=worldNews&storyID=2007-01-20T100553Z_01_L20541025_RTRUKOC_0_US-IRAN-USA-IRAQ.xml&WTmodLoc=IntNewsHome_C1_%5bFeed%5d-4
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071008190036/http://aawsat.com/english/news.asp?section=1&id=7765 to http://aawsat.com/english/news.asp?section=1&id=7765
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070419151456/http://www.iht.com:80/articles/ap/2007/04/07/africa/ME-GEN-Iraq-US-Iran-Prisoners.php to http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/04/07/africa/ME-GEN-Iraq-US-Iran-Prisoners.php
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070625050752/http://voanews.com:80/english/2007-06-22-voa52.cfm to http://voanews.com/english/2007-06-22-voa52.cfm
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120816060738/http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5icL-zDq4U3AYTKtqSnVWxlFk1CUA to http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5icL-zDq4U3AYTKtqSnVWxlFk1CUA
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160305221737/http://in.sputniknews.com/world/20151130/1016593040/iran-commandoes-russian-pilot-resque.html to http://in.sputniknews.com/world/20151130/1016593040/iran-commandoes-russian-pilot-resque.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160305221737/http://in.sputniknews.com/world/20151130/1016593040/iran-commandoes-russian-pilot-resque.html to http://in.sputniknews.com/world/20151130/1016593040/iran-commandoes-russian-pilot-resque.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Quds Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070331061726/http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=worldNews&storyID=2007-01-14T120131Z_01_MAC638878_RTRUKOC_0_US-IRAQ.xml&pageNumber=1&imageid=&cap=&sz=13&WTModLoc=NewsArt-C1-ArticlePage1 to http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=worldNews&storyID=2007-01-14T120131Z_01_MAC638878_RTRUKOC_0_US-IRAQ.xml&pageNumber=1&imageid=&cap=&sz=13&WTModLoc=NewsArt-C1-ArticlePage1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:46, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Quds Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120305015156/http://articles.cnn.com/2010-10-06/world/afghanistan.iran.weapons_1_iranian-weapons-afghanistan-sunni-taliban?_s=PM:WORLD to http://articles.cnn.com/2010-10-06/world/afghanistan.iran.weapons_1_iranian-weapons-afghanistan-sunni-taliban?_s=PM:WORLD
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=worldNews
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:41, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Iran is open about who they support and who they don't, they have made it clear on several occasions that they do not support the Houthi rebels but foreign actors attempt to associate Iran with the Houthis. I believe that the the Quds Force for the Houthis shouldn't be included in this article until Iran admits they support them or cold-hard evidence is presented. KhakePakeVatan (talk) 13:57, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Houthis 

message: shouldn't c0rrect translation be corps?Baratiiman (talk) 09:02, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  corps 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:24, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:38, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion