lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Alexander Goldenweiser (composer)

message: The standard English spelling of this pianist is "Goldenweiser".  "Alexander Goldenveyzer" has grand total of 52 Google hits, most of which are either from Wikipedia or mirrors thereof.  "Alexander Goldenweiser" pianist has 1400 ("pianist" inserted to distinguish from other Alexander Goldenweisers).  Surely we should go back to Alexander Goldenweiser being a disambiguation page (as it was until recently).  See Wikipedia:Romanization of Russian: "When something has a conventional name in English, use that name instead of transliterating."  Grover cleveland (talk) 16:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Unless I'm misunderstanding what a "set of polyphonic pieces" is, not sure this offhand claim copied directly from the Toccata Classics (promotional) website about this early 1930s piece is true.
With Rachmaninoff's Op 32 set of Preludes from 1910, Rachmaninoff completed his series of 24 preludes in all 24 "standard" major and minor keys...
And the shadow of WTC looms so large that I wouldn't be surprised to hear if someone before Rachmaninoff had attempted a similar exercise (my money is on Taneyev or Arensky).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.118.32.60 (talk) 06:02, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: *I think "contrapuntal pieces" means specifically in this context works like fugues, "contrapuntal sketches" (as with this Op.12 set by Goldenweiser), etc- works whose very title announces their contrapuntal texture :) Schissel | Sound the Note! 20:06, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Russian compsoer to write a set of polyphonic pieces in each of the major and minor keys 

message: At least an incomplete-but-in-progress list of his compositions would be good? Besides the string quartet in E minor Op.18 (published 1940 but composed- when?), the piano trio in E minor Op.31 (composed 1950), the preludes also noted, the Fantasia for voice and piano on words by Fet, ...
Also, what do you mean by "polyphonic" pieces? Feliks Blumenfeld's Op.17 preludes in all the major and minor keys (published 1892-94) predate the Goldenweiser set and are hardly monophonic, nor rococo, no? (Ah, perhaps because they're deliberately called contrapuntal sketches, or something.) I think I understand, then. Hrm. Schissel | Sound the Note! 20:04, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worklist
Talk:Miz Mam'selle Hepzibah

message: If no one objects, I'm going to replace the pictures. These were actually drawn by Chuck Jones, and Walt Kelly was angry he'd redrawn her fact to be more human. Alpha Ralpha Boulevard 07:28, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A more appropriate picture

message: She is always referred to as "Miz" in the strip, never "Miss".  I think the title heading for this entry should be changed to reflect that.  User: Rackinfrackin 23:10, 8 September 2009
:Yep. The tiniest concern is that few people are going to guess that "Miss" is spelled that way. It would be a bigger concern if it was likely searchers get the spelling of "Mam'selle Hepzibah" correct. Change away, I say. Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 08:49, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name designation

message: Just thought I'd mention that the gift Porky had inadvertently tied to his finger (a box containing a bouquet butterflies) is seperate from the gift he gave to Hepzibah (a small cactus). --Threyon (talk) 19:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuity error
Talk:XMind

message: The into section is written very much like an advertisement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.172.136.14 (talk) 03:36, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement

message: I have marked this as requiring justification as a Wikipedia entry because no evidence is given in the article that XMIND is more noteable than any of the 80 or so other mind mapping software products.  That software like MindManager is noteable is without doubt, and some others among the 80 meet the criteria for notability, but why does this one?
I previously marked this when the article was under "Xmind" here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Xmind but by a redirection, that talk page was separated from the article, and the "notable" tag disappeared, with no attempt to meet the gudelines for notability.  
Before removing the tag from this page again, I ask that editors please read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability and ensure that the article is justified by "verifiable objective evidence to support a claim of notability. Substantial coverage in reliable sources constitutes such objective evidence, as do published peer recognition and the other factors listed in the subject specific guidelines."
Argey 07:37, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It appears to now be styled XMind at the official project site.  I suggest an article rename.  I'm an inclusionist, and I think that the awards justify the existence of this article, but at present it reads far too much like an auxiliary manual page.  
The release table has become far too dominant and the platform and language columns contain an immense amount of text relative to information content.  Could we at least render the Chinese ideogram style as Chinese(S/T) with an explanatory footnote?  Or even render S and T using Chinese ideograms, since anyone who cares would be able to interpret these immediately.  Or visually, we could use the two flags from the opposite sides of the Formosa Strait (but, no, that would make some people see red.) — MaxEnt 19:47, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: XMIND or XMind

message: Can we add some info on XMind Ltd? Example who runs the company, where it is based etc. Sometimesthinking (talk) 21:21, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info on XMind Ltd.
Talk:Arthur C. Lundahl

message: I worked on the site, so I have a conflict of interest, but would an interview with transcript with Art Lundahl from 1986 be useful here as an external link? Focus of conversation is nuclear weapons policy. http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_0CAF0CFABD144923A9319040FF7DA0F8 Mccallucc (talk) 13:19, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link? 

message: In the mobile view of this page, it says "Arthur C. Lundahl" as the title, and below this title, it reads "Organiser of IMINT and an arial-photography expert".
I always edit in source code, but i mostly edit from my mobile. Would somebody please tell me how to add/edit sub-title? Thatnks a lot.  usernamekiran (talk) 23:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to add the sub-title?
Talk:Rent regulation in New York

message: Regarding: "...New York City the only large city in the United States that has strong rent control laws."  Isn't Washington, DC, a large city?  It also has rent control. 63.242.163.109 (talk) 19:00, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

message: ... so I removed that sentence.  San Francisco also has strong rent regulations.  FWIW that assertion wasn't supported by the citation either--it seems to stem from a non-authoritative quoted statement within the referenced news article, not from the reported content. --Threephi (talk) 05:41, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New York is not the only large city with strong rent control 

message: housingnyc.com domain is apparently taken over by potentially malicious parties, and now redirects to various other potentially malicious websites. It redirected me to a phishing site in one instance. Please change all references to housingnyc.com to their corresponding archive urls.
I am removing the original urls so people don't get redirected to malicious websites.
EdLeMa (talk) 17:41, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Housingnyc.com domain is taken over 

message: Please join us on 13 December 2020, 12:00-14:00 EST, as we update and improve articles in Wikipedia related to housing in the United States of America. Sign up here. -- M2545 (talk) 09:14, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invitation to [[Wikipedia:Meetup/US_housing/December_2020|US Housing Edit-a-thon]] 

message: Paragraph 4 should be removed or heavily edited 2600:4040:7C47:4D00:2DBC:F295:A0A2:E4CA (talk) 17:56, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paragraph 4 - biased opinion based information
Talk:Teletalk

message: the following is unsourced. moved here per WP:PRESERVE.  per WP:BURDEN do not restore without citing a reliable source
Teletalk has total 25.2MHz spectrum on 900, 1800 and 2100 bands. Teletalk offers both prepaid and postpaid plans for its 3G and 2G users. Its prepaid plans include 'Agami', 'Bornomala' and 'Youth'. The operator also offers 3G broadband devices such as Flash MODEM, Flash Router and MiFi Router.
In terms of subscriber base, Teletalk places 4th after Grameenphone, Robi and Banglalink. The only mobile operator behind Teletalk is Citycell.
-- Jytdog (talk) 22:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  unsourced
Talk:Pisa Baptistery

message: The link for the Rory Carroll article cited is a dead link. I believe the article may have been moved here:  http://www.emis.ams.org/journals/NNJ/Guardian.html
------------
Also consult Christine Smith: The Baptistery of Pisa. Garland Publishing 1978. (There are other sources telling about the first baptistery (fra 5ht century maybe) in the same place, it was octagonal. Now it is "only" the font itself, that's octagonal.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.57.196.106 (talk) 09:10, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Pisa Baptistry.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on April 5, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-04-05. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:41, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Pisa Baptistry.jpg]]

message: Elio1 (talk) 10:10, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: While I think Baptistry has the better sound and look.MidlandLinda (talk) 17:31, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Baptistry" or "Baptistery"?
Talk:If You Gotta Go, Go Now

message: So it says on the Manfred Mann article. How so? --Tsinfandel (talk) 22:23, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: COntroversial

message: Both articles are about the same song so should be merged into the same article. Kitchen roll (talk) 16:37, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. --Richhoncho (talk) 20:03, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree as well. PositivelyJordan (talk) 22:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: merged page  Kitchen roll (talk) 13:39, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Si Tu Dois Partir

message: The official name of this song is "If You Gotta Go, Go Now (Or Else You Got to Stay All Night)"; and many of the pages on Wikipedia that give links to this page write out the full title name. It should be moved to the name above. BootleggerWill (talk) 16:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move Article
Talk:Fractional quantum Hall effect

message: Clearly something interesting happened with this discovery, but it is not remotely obvious to the layperson what that might be.  Could somebody who understands this please tell the rest of the world what this means, in real-person terms?  It got a Nobel Prize, and this should merit some sort of explication. 68.50.169.194 (talk) 03:37, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The importance rating doesn't really mean anything. No one pays attention to whether an article is "low" or "mid" importance. Anyone capable of editing a somewhat-technical article like this will be able to judge for themselves how important and worthwhile it is, and that's exactly what happens. :-) --Steve (talk) 08:26, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

message: I've created a video to help explain QHE.  It's on the Quantum Hall Effect page.  I think a similar video should maybe appear here.  Any thoughts Grj23 (talk) 07:23, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram 

message: I'm not sure we are citing the real key works.  Greiter, Dharma-Wardana... etc.  Not key citations in the field (although respectable works)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.66.146 (talk) 12:47, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: This edit cites a prepint and claims it "explains the existence of the \nu=5/2 state". Could someone knowledgeable have at look at this? Paradoctor (talk) 14:44, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claimed solution 

message: "However, Laughlin's explanation was a phenomenological guess..."
This sentence in the lede makes no sense. It follows text that said nothing about an explanation, much less what the explanation was, or even that it was Laughlin's (the award was stated to be given for the discovery of the effect, not for a theoretical explanation). This seems like an editing mistake. Did something get removed? TricksterWolf (talk) 23:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something missing?
Talk:Hinulugang Taktak

message: I changed the title back to Hinulugang Taktak per WP:NAMINGCRITERIA. Why was there no discussion when it was changed to Hinulugan? Thanks. Briarfallen (talk) 04:38, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Hinulugan Taktak to Hinulugang Taktak
Talk:Alvin and the Chipmunks: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack

message: There is a preorder page at MusicSpace.com that has a little bit of info about the soundtrack, which the film webpage has the only link to. But since it an online store I didn't know what Wikipedia stance on external links to online stores were. So I didn't add that to the article, but I still felt that need to be mentioned as it is the only source so far as of the time of this writing. Sarujo 09:42, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  MusicSpace Source
Talk:Emotion work

message: In current pop culture and social conversations, people use Emotional Labor to refer to unpaid Emotional Work. This needs to be renamed to Emotional Labor as well. Ripresa2 (talk) 23:01, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming

message: *placing in context with other fields, research DCDuring 09:46, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible directions for expansion
Talk:Pilosa

message: The article says
:"Until recently, Pilosa was lumped with the armadillos in the order Xenarthra. Xenarthra is now generally regarded as a superorder."
This wording is potentially confusing, because it could imply that Pilosa is no longer grouped in Xenarthra.  The taxa Pilosa and Xenarthra have not changed; only the ranks have.
Cephal-odd (talk) 02:29, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  classification within Xenarthra 

message: What is the meanng of 'Pilosa' and why is it given to these animals? Caeruleancentaur (talk) 20:39, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's from the Latin pilosus, which means "hairy". I guess one of the most obvious things sloths and anteaters have in common to the exclusion of armadillos is that they tend to have quite a bit more hair. I'll see whether I can dig up Flower's original description, which might have more information. Ucucha (talk) 21:10, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's at  and doesn't give an etymology. Flower refers to an earlier paper at  that gives his reasons for grouping sloths and anteaters; unfortunately, Google's copy is missing two pages, so I can't check whether he mentioned hairiness there. Ucucha (talk) 21:34, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the name?
Talk:Kevin Owens and Sami Zayn

message: I deleted it for the same reason "Londrick" was deleted from Paul London and Brian Kendrick; it's simply not an official on-screen name. If it can be sourced as official, then it can be added back. Tromboneguy0186 10:06, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The portmanteau name 

message: why edit the captionl Jjaksema (talk) 16:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  why edit 

message: With the current article image pending deletion on Commons due to violating the non-free content policy, is there any alternative image that can be used for the article that is public domain or can be justified under fair use? If not, would it be a better idea to use either the  or two smaller images of each wrestler? I just thought this was something to consider given that otherwise the article would have no image at all. BrandonStirton (talk) 04:10, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Who even cares about a picture on a page? 72.240.96.170 (talk) 11:17, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article image
Talk:Evelyn Hamann

message: "German Film Awards
Evelyn Hamann was replaced by Johnny Nitro at the German Film Awards at Berlin, as Evelyn was not there due to personal issues, stemming from the death of her husband Chris."
-- sorry to speak so harsh, but that sounds like crap to me. I could not find any information about that, I didn't even find anything about Hamann at the Deutscher Filmpreis or being married to someone named Chris. 82.83.192.18 19:29, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shadwell, West Yorkshire

message: Surely it is better than stub class. Chemical Engineer (talk) 17:17, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class 
Talk:Near-field scanning optical microscope

message: Hi there, the volume number of reference 3 is missing. Maybe someboby wants to doublecheck and amend it. I Found the source to be:
 The Journal of Chemical Physics, Volume 112, Issue 18, pp. 7761-7774
--137.195.250.2 11:00, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Literally this technology works identically *through-tip* surface plasmon enhanced nanolithography.   There are 2 basic types in the literature.  THe "microsphere enhanced tip-to-substrate microjet" kind and the "through-hole AFM probe highly focused laser" kind.   The only other difference I can see in the NSOM is that the laser is intended for imaging and the detector is designed for imaging.   In Lithography, the laser is desgined for ablation, and the detector is designed simply for control and feedback (since the patterning and operation are programmed into the piezostage and laser 67.165.123.62 (talk) 19:02, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Near field surface plasmon enhanced nanolithography - a functionally identical technique differing only by use of a stronger laser on substrates to be ablated or radiation dosed
Talk:Esholt

message: The article claims, without citation, that 1,495 people live in Esholt.  This seems rather dubious, as the village is tiny — I can't imagine where the 400+ houses needed for such a population could be.  I'd estimate its population as not significantly over 100. Dricherby (talk) 10:45, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population 
Talk:Civil Code of the Philippines

message: I move to split this article and I propose that a separate article be created for the Family Code. The Family Code is not part of the Civil Code and has, in fact, superseded the Civil Code for marriages celebrated after August 3, 1988. There are also significant differences between the two with regard to the rights, duties, property relations and other matters between spouses. At best, I think only a brief mention of the FC would be appropriate in his article. However, a detailed discussion of the FC cannot be possible in a page supposedly dedicated to the CC alone.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riverarvi (talk • contribs) 16:33, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. These are two separate landmark laws. –Sanglahi86 (talk) 15:48, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creation of a separate article for the Family Code 
Talk:Revised Penal Code

message: This edit caught my eye. The edit changed the unsupported assertion that the pduration of the Reclusion Perpetua penalty was 30 years to read 40 years instead without providing support for the new figure.
Chapter three Section one of the Revised Penal Code civers Duration of Penalties, and can be seen here. It gives durations as follows:
*Reslusion Perpetua: 30 years. However this was amended to 40 years by RA7659.
*Reclusion Temporal: 12 years and one day to 20 years.
*Prision mayor: Six years and one day to 12 years.
*Prision correccional, suspension, and destierro: Six months and one day to six years.
*Arresto mayor: One month and one day to six months.
*Arresto menor: One day to thirty days.
Looking at this, I noticed that just ablve the Penalties section there is an assertion that the duration of the reclusion perpetua penalty ranges from 20 years and 1 day to 40 years' imprisonment, citing RA9346 in support. I looked at the cited source and found no support for that assertion. However it is supported by RA7659.
Here, I've added content and cited sources to clarify this. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 22:50, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Durations of penalties 

message: the Revised penal code 2405:8D40:450C:B435:177D:FAB:6552:6CD6 (talk) 13:09, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction to criminology 

message: The revised Penal code 2405:8D40:450C:B435:177D:FAB:6552:6CD6 (talk) 13:11, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction to  criminology
Talk:Sh-K-Boom Records

message: The tone of this page isn't quite neutral...it reads like a press release.
Agiorgio 11:30, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:San Andres, Catanduanes

message: Virac Bishop Manolo A. De Los Santos of the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) confirmed on June 13, 2008, the existence of a ‘miraculous’ "growing" century old stone (now 3 inches in height) in Paloway, San Andres, Catanduanes, Bicol Region which has the image of the Blessed Virgin Mary and is said to heal illnesses: “What is unexplainable is not that the stone grew in size over the years, but the fact that the image of the Virgin was never distorted as it grew." Called “Batong Paloway (Stone of Paloway)," it is at the altar of the Our Lady of Sorrows chapel, a “de facto shrine" in Barangay Paloway and the image is called “Our Lady of Sorrows." gmanews.tv, 'Miraculous' stone with image of Mary 'grows' in Bicol--Florentino floro (talk) 09:25, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miraculous, growing "Stone of Paloway" 
Talk:Ala (demon)/Archive 1

message: I used the inline citations in the following cases:
#debatable points (like in the Etymology section), or potentially so (like in the Origin section);
#citations of verses and tales;
#information from sources other than those listed in the References section.
The article is based on the latter sources, and all the information without inline citations comes from one or more of them. Since there is nothing debatable in it, I see no need to make several dozen inline citations and spread them through the article. The sources are in Serbian or Bulgarian: I suppose that this is the first text about Ala ever written in English (if I'm wrong, please let me know). VVVladimir 18:16, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Capitalization seems to be remarkably inconsistent in this article. If Ala is a proper name, it should be capitalized at every occurrence. If it isn't, then there should be some text indicating that it is in fact not a proper name, and indicating exactly what the word "ala" is if not a proper name. John Carter 17:48, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no inconsistency in capitalization of this article. Look a little bit more closely: ala is capitalized only when it is the first word in a sentence. Ala is a mythological creature like dragons, fairies, vampires, etc. It is seen in the article that there is not only one ala, which implies that ala is not a proper name, in the same way as e.g. dragon, fairy, and vampire are not proper names. VladoTalk 13:19, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment
Talk:Belison

message: * Municipal Hall ,Mt. Guinubatan , and Iglesia Filipina Independiente Church  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.60.228.50 (talk) 02:34, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some important places in Belison 
Category talk:Seventh-day Adventists

message: Some subcategories I created of this category were deleted, yet unfortunately the articles were not placed in this higher level category. I found a list of at least some of them in the contributions by a bot (search for "Adventist"). Also here. Need to add this category to those articles. Colin MacLaurin (talk) 12:11, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted subcategories