Talk:Uma Bharti

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 20:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 21:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag 

message: Please avoid to put information on talk pages or anywhere on Wikipedia, that is unacceptable and falls under 
*Wikipedia:No personal attacks
*WP:NOTPROMOTION
*WP:PRIVACY
for more awareness about how to behave at talk pages, please go for WP:TPG --Dr.pragmatist (talk) 07:16, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not discuss apart [[WP:TPG]] 

message: There is no section about Bharti's Political career; how on earth was that not the first thing written? I will try to create one. Does anybody have suggestions/comments?
Vanamonde93 (talk) 12:52, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political Career 

message: Doesn't sadhvi just mean a female sadhu, which she is anyway?  Why is this controversial? Kautilya3 (talk) 18:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Well yes, but where's the controversy? The IP removed it; I reinserted it, and duplicated the ref. Feel free to tweak the language. Vanamonde93 (talk) 20:16, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sadhvi 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Uma Bharti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090208163735/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com:80/articleshow/824224.cms to http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/824224.cms
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:47, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:01, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: * ∯WBGconverse 14:41, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources