Talk:Irving Oil

message: :http://www.rabble.ca/news_full_story.shtml?sh_itm=487a2345be969133210c32ad0147e359&rXn=1&
:What is the point of the above link? It seems full of nothing more than speculation with little to back up the assertions it makes.
:: While I'm all for balance in Wikipedia articles, opposition to specific entities, be they governments, individuals or corporations, needs to be focused.  The K.C. Irving article talks about the vertical integration model that was implemented for the entier "Irving Group of Companies".  Perhaps an Irving Group of Companies entry can be created that would better hold this information?  I foresee that uninformed readers will stumble onto this Irving Oil article and think it is the vertical integrator, when it seems that all three major areas controlled by K.C.'s sons are integrated:  energy, natural resources & transportation, construction.  Just a thought.  Plasma east 19:38, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Irving opposition

message: Anybody know what naming system Irving used for their ships? Or if there's a list of their names? (The comapny website doesn't have 1 I could find.)  Trekphiler 23:09, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: In the tanker

message: I have assessed this as Start Class, as it contains more detail and organization than would be expected of a Stub, and of Low Importance, as I do not feel that many people outside of Canada would be familiar with the subject of this article. Cheers, CP 01:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: I don't see any real point of relevance in having a summary of incidents at the refinery and Canaport LNG terminal, mainly because there is no such section in the article for Ultramar and understandably, not Petro-Canada or ConocoPhillips.  Would like to get feedback before editing or removal of section.  Calvinhrn (talk) 20:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Incidents

message: The Criticisms section is absurd. Most of the criticisms are simply out of ignorance for common business practices and their purposes. I'd say that about 20% of that section is actually worth keeping. I just overhauled the whole thing, but it's still filled with junk. I deleted the rampant POV sentences and original research. There were tons of personal statements, such as "citizens have had feelings of distrust towards Irving for years." It's all one man's (or woman's) rant, and Wikipedia is not the place for that. Also, I tried to mitigate the problem by adding sentences that provide proper perspective and show the flip-side of the issues being discussed. ask123 (talk) 19:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms section was filled with POV; original research; and personal, unverified statements. 

message: In the section of the article on the Irving chain of convenience stores, there is no mention of the Riverdale lines of soda and potato chips that emerged in the 90's.  Someone should write a piece on this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.100.63.68 (talk) 21:36, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riverdale private line of products 

message: --John Bessa (talk) 20:52, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Irving ref. panorama

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Irving Oil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061120092728/http://www.cbc.ca:80/money/story/2006/10/04/nb-newrefinery.html to http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2006/10/04/nb-newrefinery.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070825112052/http://www.cbc.ca:80/money/story/2005/06/07/irving-050607.html to http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2005/06/07/irving-050607.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hi, I just reverted an edit which claimed, without providing a source, "In 2023 Irving oil is considering selling the business." I mistakenly noted this as "possible vandalism" given that further research indicates that this is, in fact, true; however, I made the revert as it was not sourced. If you add this info back please add a citation. WittyWidi (talk) 05:03, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted edit on 2023/07/24