lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:New York State Route 47

message: This article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary.Fwgoebel 04:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of Intersection Template 

message: From :
*NY 104 to NY 383 (now NY/I-390): 6.34 mi
*I-390 to Rochester city line (NY 383): 0.12 mi
Calculated using Microsoft Streets and Trips:
*Rochester city line to Elmwood (NY 383): 0.35 mi
*NY 383 to I-590 (Elmwood): 4.42 mi
From :
*Elmwood to Culver (NY/I-590): 8.06 mi
;Total
19.29 miles --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 23:47, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length notes 

message: *Rochester alignment not numbered in 1932 ALA Green Book map (NY 47 still on Lake George-Hague alignment)
*1938 map shows Route 47 in Rochester area as described in History section except that the map shows it ending at NY 31 (Lyell Ave). Route must have been designated between 1932 and 1938. When was it extended north to Greece?
--Polaron | Talk 14:45, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History notes 

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written:
#:Pass It's adequately organized, can format in many computer resolutions.
#It is factually accurate and verifiable:
#:Weak pass Has plenty of references that point to reliable sources. The only main problem is that the intro paragraph doesn't have any at the time. Also, that last sentence in the intro section is strongly recommended to be moved or merged where appropriate. In short, that sentence "In 1980, the NY 47 designation was removed and replaced with several others, including NY 590 and NY 390." doesn't belong there on its own. But those flaws are only minor, because that can easily be fixed! :)
#It is broad in its coverage:
#:Pass Lots of stuff covered in the article throughout. Looks good, overall.
#It follows the neutral point of view policy:
#:Pass Lookin' good!
#It is stable:
#:Pass No edit wars there either. 
#It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
#:Pass Plenty of pictures placed in appropriate spots in the article throughout. Could use more if possible, though.
#Overall:
#:Pass To sum up, this article meets the criteria for a good article, but if it were to be promoted even further, this article would most likely need a fix on the introductory paragraph. But overall, it's a pass. Good job! We are now all happy. :) Dabbydabby (talk) 01:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Review
Talk:New York State Route 48

message: This article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary.Fwgoebel 04:57, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of Intersection Template 

message: How did it get from State Fair Boulevard to Geddes Street? --NE2 23:08, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original route in Syracuse
Talk:New York State Route 104

message: NY 104 ends at First/Niagara and not at the Rainbow Bridge. From First street, 104 makes the first right on to Main St. Wiki won't let me upload google street image, but check it out! --SammyWesternNY (talk) 21:57, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect Western Terminus
Talk:Oldsmobile Starfire

message: There was another Oldsmobile Starfire, it was produced in the early 1960s. It was replaced by the Toronado--Jnelson09 00:40, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

message: The only H-body cars that had coupe and wagon models were the following:
Chevrolet Vega
Chevrolet Monza
Pontiac Astre
Pontiac Sunbird
The Oldsmobile Starfire, like the Buick Skyhawk of the same vintage, came only as a "2+2" hatchback coupe. I will update the page to correct this innacuracy and will add to the article later. Rhettro76 22:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wagon and coupe models? 
Talk:New York State Route 198

message: The article states definitively that 198 is being downgraded from a limited-access highway, but the link provided seems to be to a study.  Should the article's statement be so firm or should it merely indicate that the change is under consideration? --Jfruh (talk) 14:56, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Downgrade from limited access? 
Talk:Love Music Hate Racism

message: It's not just the ANL, Unite against Fascism have a logo on the LMHR website.
:True. Added. --JK the unwise 18:51, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Something this big should have a logo. If you can find it, it should be added on this page.
--Iamred1 Talk to me!  18:11, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  logo 

message: As a firm believer that all information on Wikipedia should be at least sourced by one reliable citation, I have removed all unreferenced information. Could someone who wishes to expand this article please try and locate some as so to make it more than just a stub.  Alexandre8 (talk) 18:23, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  unsourced information 

message: {u| Rapture17}} has removed this sentence with no explanation:  Is there a reason the names of its directors should be removed? BobFromBrockley (talk) 22:49, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  unexplained reversion
Talk:New York State Route 199

message: *by 1926: NY 41 assigned, Barrytown (ferry landing) to Millerton (NY 22) ()
**assigned mid-1920s as 1924 NYT article does not mention NY 41
*1930 renumbering: NY 41 renumbered to NY 199 (NYT)
*2/2/1957: Kingston-Rhinecliff Bridge opens () as realignment/extension of NY 199 (1958 GD map)
**the segment of the western bridge approach from US 9W to NY 32 was completed sometime between 1958 and 1960; in 1958 NY 199 began at NY 32 and NY 32-US 9W was marked as under construction (1958 GD, 1960 RMcN)
**portion of former NY 199 from Barrytown to NY 9G remained a reference route; see below
*4/1/1980: ownership/maintenance of NY 199's old routing from Barrytown to NY 9G transferred to Dutchess County as part of a maintenance swap (NY Highway Law), becomes CR 82
Also, at some point there was an extremely minor realignment of NY 199 in Red Hook near the northern end of the NY 9G overlap (). If no one can find an exact date or range for when it happened, it's probably not worth mentioning in the article. – TMF 01:14, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History notes 

message: This belongs more on an article on the Ulster and Delaware Turnpike than here since NY 199 uses just the portion of the turnpike east of the Hudson.
West of the river, the turnpike connected the city of Kingston to modern-day Bainbridge. It then followed modern NY 28 west from Kingston up to the hamlet of Andes. From Andes, the turnpike alignment left NY 28 to follow modern Delaware County Road 2 to De Lancey, NY 10 to Walton, and NY 206 to the Village of Bainbridge.
– TMF 05:44, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from article 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:NY 199 E of Hammertown 2014.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on June 19, 2018. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2018-06-19. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:20, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:NY 199 E of Hammertown 2014.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:New York State Route 207

message: It doesn't appear that NY 207 was ever signed as NY 84.  --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 18:40, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I'll take that out. I think someone confused it and 211. Daniel Case 15:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NY 84 note in intro
Talk:New York State Route 300

message: This article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary. Fwgoebel 18:41, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of Intersection Template 

message: I tagged this article for several reasons:
# The route description is a mess. There are paragraphs that are too short, there are paragraphs that are too long, and there's a bulleted list in the first subsection that has nothing to do with the route's description. On that note, the description is a strange mish-mash of a description of the route and the history of the route and other things along it - and the latter shouldn't be here. The second paragraph of the North of I-84 section is a pretty good example of this.
# The history is poorly written, incomplete, and bounces around chronologically. Also, the references are very substandard and in some cases incomplete. Examples:
#*"Article by Judy Rife in the Middletown (NY) Times Herald Record Tuesday, September 22, 2009, page 28." - lacks a title, thus it fails WP:V
#*"Old Town property maps on file in the Town of Newburgh Town Hall." - fails WP:V. If the individual maps were cited using , this would be acceptable.
#*"Official list of road names in Town of Newburgh for use by 911 Emergency Officials, Town Clerk's Office, Newburgh, New York" - this likely fails WP:V as well, but if not there's surely a better reference out there to replace this.
#*In fact, every reference but the first two has at least one issue. – TMF 23:46, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Resolved, for the most part. – TMF 04:46, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite tag and attention rationale
Talk:New York State Route 301

message: This article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary. Fwgoebel 18:46, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of Intersection Template 

message: Looks like NY 301 was designated in 1930; beyond that I have no clue as to the route's history. Any ideas? –Juliancolton | Talk 04:31, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll list what I know below. I'll get to adding it into the article at some point if someone else doesn't do it. – TMF 08:30, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Designation 
Talk:New York State Route 352

message: Old configuration of west end - Pulteney and Water (probably original NY 17) had already been cut --SPUI (T - C) 22:56, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

message: This article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary. Fwgoebel 15:49, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of Intersection Template
Talk:New York State Route 390

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I propose a merger between this page and the page for Interstate 390, as the two routes are essentially two segments of the same route, just with different systems of maintenance. There are other examples of Wikipedia pages for such routes, such as Interstate 540 and North Carolina Highway 540 and Interstate 210 and State Route 210 (California). Feel free to add your thoughts on this below.
Thanks—WuTang94(user talk) 20:16, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm inclined to oppose.  The key point with the two other articles that you listed is that there is a plan for the state highways to become part of the Interstate.  Is that the case with NY 390?  At a glance it seems that NY 390 was renumbered as a continuation of the Interstate. –Fredddie™ 01:39, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, that's a good point. Never thought about the fact that NY 390 will likely stay a state highway and not be designated part of I-390. Thanks for the insight. —WuTang94(user talk) 03:11, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

text: I talked about this a long time ago, but NY 390, 590 and 890 are continuations and will never be interstate. Mitch32(My ambition is to hit .400  and talk 1.000.) 01:54, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: @Mitchazenia Good point. Now I see you opposed the merger between I-590 and NY 590, which makes more sense now. Thanks for the insight. —WuTang94(user talk) 03:11, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

text: But then, we do have Interstate 110 and State Route 110 (California). --Rschen7754 02:16, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal with [[Interstate 390]] 
Talk:New York State Route 440

message: This page needs an exit list Jgcarter 16:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It already has one. New York State Route 440#Exit list. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 19:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Exit List
Talk:Tab Energy

message: The New Yorker notes than the original Tab has thirty-one milligrams of caffeine and no calories, while Tab Energy has ninety-five milligrams and five calories. Now, is that miligrams per can? Because the cans are different sizes, so these numbers might need adjusting. -Litefantastic 00:46, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ratio?

message: Oxymoronic or what? How is this stuff permitted to be marketed as an "energy" drink when it only has 5 calories per can? 16:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Low-calorie energy drink? 

message: I drank one of these once. It tasted like pickles. Anyone else agree? 68.205.128.200 13:40, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gross or what? 

message: I could not find it either in December 2007. I finally called Coca Cola. They said it has been discontinued in the US. Weird. That stuff was great. 76.16.39.180 (talk) 12:43, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internal Coke memo 
Talk:Tropas Nómadas

message: Good expansion, whoever wrote it. But what's the source for it? Not that I don't trust the edit, but I'd like to read more on the subject myself. Arre 00:54, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Drawn from contemporary reporting on the transition from Spanish to Moroccan rule, illustrated books on the history of the Spanish Army by Jose Bueno and a website devoted to "Tropas Nomadas del Sahara". Sorry that I haven't kept exact references but Google should track both books and website.Buistr 21:15, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Arthropleura

message: Consistency: Article early on describes animal as probably carnivorous, but later as definitely herbivorous.
Sandcastlesofstone 09:47, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I think Arthropleura was a herbivorous animal.The biggest weight is almost ever, with herbivorous or onivorous animal.Agre22 (talk) 11:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: An herbivorous animal

message: No way this is fair use. We're not talking about the film 64.131.243.173 (talk) 15:16, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image:WalkingWithMonsters

message: I've been trying for years to find out how wide the animal and/or the tracks of this creature are.  Is there anyone who can add this data to the article?  --Suttkus (talk) 23:16, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Without a width the length measurement is largely meaningless. Was it 1 cm wide or 1 foot wide? Fig (talk) 10:46, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  I found this: Imprints are 5-7 cm wide and up to 1.5 to 2 cm deep (Fig. 4C-E). The external width of the trackway is 32- 38 cm. Based on the body width/length ratio of 3.6 to 4.4 (Kraus, 1993; Schneider and Werneburg, 1998), an Arthropleura of 1.37 to 1.67 m body length was the trail maker [] Triangulum (talk) 08:21, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Width

message: There appears to be an obscure reference to Arthropleura on page 335 of Halo cryptum MMFA (talk) 00:37, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: "Nearby, something like a small tank passed by me on many pumping legs, a gigantic armor-plated arthropod almost three meters long. It ignored me, for I was not the rotting vegetation it favored as a meal." - Page 335 of Halo: Cryptum MMFA (talk) 00:39, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless it actually said it was Arthropleura, and or explains how this mention of Arthropleura is important to the plot of Halo, please don't use the "In Popular Culture" section as a laundry list of "spot the monster"--Mr Fink (talk) 04:59, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't edit it, I was just making a suggestion MMFA (talk) 13:30, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: "or explains how this mention of Arthropleura is important to the plot of Halo," You've got this backward--it needs to explain how the plot of Halo is relevant to the animal Arthropleura or has effected public perception of that animal. Otherwise it belongs only on the Halo page at best. MMartyniuk (talk) 14:55, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halo Reference
Talk:Cross Bay Veterans Memorial Bridge

message: I am quite sure the picture of the fishermen along the walkway is from the Joseph Addabo bridge between Broad Channel and Howard Beach, and not the Cross Bay Bridge. I've walked the full length of both, and I can tell. In fact, looking north, the walkway on Cross Bay Bridge is on the right-hand side of the bridge and not left as shown. The picture needs to be removed.Avman89 (talk) 05:29, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  I was merely passing through vaguely familiar territory, snapping pictures, and gladly take your word for it in preference to my own leaky memory.  Jim.henderson (talk) 04:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bridge picture 
Talk:Notes on a Scandal

message: I'm not a contributor to Wikipedia so I'm not in a great position to say what is and what isn't a good article but, every time I finish a book, I like to read it's Wikipedia entry and, in this case, I found it quite poor. There were a lack of references, I felt the article was more literary than factual and the whole thing seemed to lack the cold hard gaze an encyclopedia entry should have. Alicemaryflorence (talk) 20:41, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a great article 

message: What is the rationale for using first or surnames? It looks suspiciously like first names for women/girls and surnames for men/boys.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snugglepuss (talk • contribs) 20:07, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters' names
Talk:Cross Island Parkway

message: The shields that are going up now on the Belt and Cross Island have a modified version of the Long Island parkway style. They're black and white and have the Montauk Point lighthouse, but they spell out the name like the state standard (eg the Taconic.) I have yet to see these on Wikipedia. Can someone design it for here?
The White and Green style like seen in Westchester/Putnam/Dutchess/Columbia is also seen in The Bronx, Manhattan, and Staten Island, especially in The Bronx.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew Kirschner (talk • contribs) 21:32, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, they're there...they've been there for 5 years, if not less. Jgcarter 22:42, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route Shield 

message: We should probably measure mileage from the west end of the Belt Parkway, since the exit numbers are mile-based. --NE2 03:32, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure it's mile-based? It doesn't quite match up in all places although *on average* there is one exit per mile. In any case, it is probably best to use the mile markers that are actually posted on the road. --Polaron | Talk 01:06, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 28A and 28B wouldn't be suffixed if it were sequential. I didn't realize mileposts on the road started from the SSP though. --NE2 22:35, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It only has the reference markers not the standard mile markers and I don't remember how the actual mileage of the reference markers went (they're hard to read when you're the one driving). The current exit numbers were obtained from the original exit numbers by simply subtracting the old number from 37 and retaining the letter suffix. Is the SSP mile-based too? --Polaron | Talk 23:25, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, then they're probably from the start of the reference route (and reset at the county line); the Belt Parkway is likely split into four parts for the mile markers. I believe the Belt is also mile-based, but not the SSP. The following exit numbers existed in 1964:
#not shown
#*1A I-678
#Francis Lewis
#I-295
#Bell
#NY 25A
#I-495
#Grand Central Parkway
#Union Turnpike
#NY 25B
#NY 25
#NY 24
#Linden
--NE2 00:16, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mileage
Talk:Michael Rensing

message: His contract with Köln is valid since today because he was a free agent and doesn't have to wait until the opening of the transfer window.  --Yoda1893 (talk) 18:30, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't have to yell . I just wanted to add the 1. FC Köln squad template and somehow this collided with your edit. Happy now? --Jaellee (talk) 18:46, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  he moved with immediate effect to Köln 
Talk:FDR Drive

message: "With one exception, Moses had conceptualized and planned every single highway, parkway, expressway, tunnel or other major road in and around New York City; that exception being the East River Drive" - quote from article History of New York City transportation.  On the other hand, the present article attributes the Drive to him.  Is one of these statements mistaken?  Jim.henderson 22:17, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moses

message: Hello all... 
An image used in the article, specifically :Image:Fdrnight10.jpg, has a little bit of a licensing issue.  The image was uploaded back when the rules around image uploading were less restrictive.  It is presumed that the uploader was willing to license the picture under the GFDL license but was not clear in that regard.  As such, the image, while not at risk of deletion, is likely not clearly licensed to allow for free use in any future use of this article.  If anyone has an image that can replace this, or can go take one and upload it, it would be best.
You have your mission, take your camera and start clicking.--Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:13, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image needs replacement 

message: The New York City Department of Transportation has officially removed signage from the FDR Drive and the exit has been permanently barricaded, therefore I suggest that Exit 6 be permanently deleted from the list of exits. YborCityJohn (talk) 18:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: There’s nothing wrong with leaving a closed exit in the exit list. The notes and gray coloring provide the information that exit 6 is closed. Dough4872 19:21, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exit 6 no longer exists
Talk:Grand Central Parkway

message: I was advised to take this (from Brklyn) to the Northern State instead of taking Southern State - in order to avoid the many curves on SSP. However, GCP is also extremely curvy and also hilly. I have since been told it is not a very safe route in icy weather. The SSP article mentions safety, curves, & improvements for safety's sake. I do not see any comments on this in the GCP article.--JimWae (talk) 20:45, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Safety
Talk:Henry Hudson Parkway

message: The highway ends at 57th street, not 72nd. Even mapquest labels the stretch between 57th and 72nd as the Henry Hudson parkway. --FourteenClowns (talk) 18:56, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Southern Terminus