Talk:Los Alamos High School

message: very well done ...tell us a bit more ... alumni - any more.... more pics welcome Victuallers 22:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merry Xmas 2007! Nice to see the pics! Yes you are mid importance. ?If you get this well referenced using the ref tag (ideally the cite tag too) and you can then get a B or GA. You can apply for reassessment at the schools ptoject if you want a second opinion (this is not an exact science). Well done Victuallers (talk) 08:56, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WP Schools Assessment

message: Hi.  This section needs work but it's going to be expanded upon.  Since it meets the criteria for verifiability and NOR (or is flagged appropriately) please leave it here for the time being or help improve it.  Thanks.  
--Ryan Utt 16:40, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: All facts on the page are from the references listed in the reference section.  I can add footnotes for any contested material to aid verification. --Ryan Utt 04:00, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Athletics Section 

message: I'm nearing completion of the article.  Only a few things left I want to take care of:
1) Funding -- Los Alamos Public Schools formerly recieved funds directly from DOE.  Now they recieve funds from some federal intermediary that also provides some support to the surrounding communities such as Espanola.  I wish I could get the facts regarding this situation, but they are hard to find.  
2) Extra-curricular activities -- in particular I would like to get a photo of the landscaping work done by X-scape.  
3) Campus -- just a few basic facts about the campus including the most key biographical details of the people buildings are named after: Duane W. Smith, Griffith, etc.
--Ryan Utt 06:09, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions to page 

message: From Wiki fair use policy section 1: "Always use a more free alternative if one is available".  Since no alternative photos showing the same material are available, then this specific photo does not fail the specific criteria cited by the person who removed it.   --Ryan Utt 00:34, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo of LAHS 

message: re: person who replaced "white" w/ "European American" and "black" w/ "African American"
I reversed the changes so that the lahs page reflects the wording of the source material.  If you feel really strongly about it then we can talk about how to reconcile the wording of the source with what is an arguably more politically correct wording.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryan Utt (talk • contribs) 05:36, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Somebody has re-reverted it.  I find the term "European American" inaccurate and to be personally insulting, as I attended this high school as a non-American white person (Caucasian if you prefer).  Because of the international nature of Los Alamos in general and the high school in particular I think it is inappropriate to use the term if the source material uses the word "white".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.184.251.62 (talk) 15:10, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnic Composition 

message: The source included in the article describing LA as rich is not meant to be authoritative, but merely describe the perception of LAHS by some of its peers.  I think this perception is shared by many.  It is not true that Los Alamos is the richest county in America.  In the most recent census results, Los Alamos wasn't even in the top 25 counties for median income:  .  However, in terms of per capita income and median income, it is the wealthiest county in the state of new mexico, even though none of the most wealthy new mexicans live in Los Alamos .
I'm not sure how much of this information should be discussed in the LAHS article versus what should be moved to the article on LA County.  Maybe the best thing to do would be to just state the numbers and leave it at that? Greg Comlish (talk) 19:54, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wealth in Los Alamos County 

message: This article has got a lot of strengths.  For instance, it's got loads of references which is great.  But it's missing a clearly organized cohesive framework.  It feels like a loosely organized list of facts where distinct items have little connection to each other.  We need to reorganize everything for the sake of the reader.  New sections should be added to make information easier to find.  Summaries should be added to existing sections which are little more than lists (athletics, awards).  There is now plenty of material here, but the article cannot improve unless it becomes more readable.  Greg Comlish (talk) 20:27, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Improvements 

message: I am assessing this article, per a request left at the Schools Project page.
Prior to assessment, I have done a major cleaning.  There was a great deal of unencyclopedic information.  I hope I got it all.
This article, upon my arrival was classified as "B Class".  I am starting this assessment against the B-Class criteria:
1.  The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations where necessary.
One particular strength of this article is that, while there is considerable referencing, and it is diverse, there is still a great deal that needs to be referenced. The alumni section, even after being gutted, still largely unreferenced.  The future plans for seniors is not only out of date, but poorly referenced to the school itself (that really needs to be independently referenced or deleted).  This is hardly a major weakness of this article, but still needs to be worked on. To reach my consideration of "suitably referenced" there shouldn't be any unreferenced sections, and this article has a couple of those.  There is also a minor concern regarding the use of references from the school/district to support some important claims that should be independently verified.
2.  The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies.
I don't see any sections that appear to be missing.
3.  The article has a defined structure.
There may be minor tweaks needed, but there is nothing close to a major problem here.
4.  The article is reasonably well-written.
I don't see any major issues here, especially with the more peacocky language has been deleted.  It is hardly perfect, but not too bad.
5.  The article contains supporting materials where appropriate.
No problems here.
The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way.
Again, no problems here ... I don't think there was any inside language or material that the average person wouldn't understand.
The three big things I would caution on:
1.  Keep out non-notable alumni, students, and staff.  They should generally only be noted if they meet the general notability guideline.
2.  Avoid the colorful language that is too self-promotional of the school.  See WP:PRESTIGE.
3.  Not only does there need to be a little more referencing, but make sure not too much of it is from the school itself.  If the article claims that over 85% of the student go to 4 year colleges, that needs an independent verification.  State championships need referencing the alumni need references which support that this person actually attended the school.  The music stuff needs referencing (not sure if that should even stay ... it should really only be state championship level achievements.
4.  Be careful about not adding external links that don't belong.
I wish you the best of luck ... this seems to be a fairly important school, and it seems very close to moving up to "B" and then beyond. LonelyBeacon (talk) 04:01, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Referencing is clearly improved in all sections.  I will head off a request for reassessment and bump this to the "B" class it clearly deserves after a lot of hard work.  Keep up the great work on improving this article. LonelyBeacon (talk) 14:05, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: February 2011 Assessment

message: There are a number of claims that have had  tags for too long.  These need to be separately from the article to maintain quality.  The claims are:
:* The Girls Cross Country Team was ranked first nationally among high school teams in the pre-season ranking for the next year.
:* All four LAHS choirs received superior ratings at the District Large Group Festival in 2009. Two of these choirs also received "Best in Class" for Class AAAA schools.
:* LAHS Wind Ensemble Band nearly always receives a superior rating from the New Mexico Music Educators Association Large Group Festival, placing 1st in 2008 and 2009.
These claims can stay here until somebody can source them. Greg Comlish (talk) 02:10, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The PhD claim is cited in Business Week, a reputable source.  Note that Madison WI is not a county and therefore could not be the county with the highest PhDs per capita. Greg Comlish (talk) 03:52, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Business Week might be a reputable source for business news, but not for demographic information.  Did they conduct a census to find out which county has the most Ph.D.s?  I have seen this claim for years, but have never seen a study that backs it up.  7minus1 (talk) 16:46, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Business Week is regarded as a reputable source for its content, both business news and not.  Like most news organizations, they don't conduct their own demographic studies but verify claims using published works such as the American Community Survey by the US Census.  Greg Comlish (talk) 17:15, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe.  All I want to know is what demographic study did they verify this "fact" with?  As far as I know, the American Community Survey doesn't break down counties by how many Ph.D.s they have.  Correct me if I'm wrong.  It seems to me that this is a piece of folklore that has been repeated so often that it has taken on the aura of truthfulness, although it has never been carefully verified.  I am sure you could find other "reliable" places where this factoid is repeated, but that doesn't make it verified. 7minus1 (talk) 16:45, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You'd have to ask Business Week where they get their information.  My only claim is that the citation is sufficient to meet the criteria for verifiability stated at WP:V "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth: whether readers can check that material in Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true."  I wish you luck in tracking down the original source of the information and I'd love to hear what you come up with. Greg Comlish (talk) 16:58, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing Chronically Unsourced Material 

message: The following information has been relocated to the talk page until we can find an independent source to verify
2004 Survey
* 4 year college: 86.4 %
* 2 year college: 3.7%
* Technical / Vocational School: 3.2 %
* Military: 4.3 %
* Undecided: 2.3 %
* Nothing: 0.2%
Greg Comlish (talk) 03:14, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Senior Class Plans 

message: The "educational success is attributed to PHDs" again, but I really don't think it deserves inclusion in the lede. The lede is very paltry and covers odd parts of the article. tedder (talk) 22:15, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Why don't you tell me what you think should be in the lede? Because from my reading of WP:LEDE we should be including the most notable details from the rest of the article in a summary style.  Greg Comlish (talk) 23:14, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: When I have some time in the next few days I'll try to write a lede. tedder (talk) 23:18, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Go to WP:WPSCH#Featured articles and take a look at some of the relevant articles (i.e. other high schools) there.  Also check out the lists below that for A-Class and GA-class.  Those articles will give you a general idea of not only what a lead should look like but the article itself; some things to use as a base model for this one.  If I were writing the lead, I'd have the basic intro of what type of school it is and where, then a little summary of the history, mention some of the academic accolades, then a paragraph with recent enrollment numbers, some of the most notable or unique courses and programs available along with a mention of the athletics (like the team name).  Basically, at least a sentence from each section of the article; more sentences for larger sections.  --JonRidinger (talk) 02:54, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Jon.  I'm following your direction and looking at Stuyvesant High School on WP:WPSCH#Featured articles.  In the first paragraph of the lede the article declares "Stuyvesant is noted for its strong academic programs, having produced many notable alumni including four Nobel laureates. U.S. News & World Report ranked it thirty-first in their 2009 list of America's best "Gold-Medal" public high schools.".  This example is emblematic of the ledes in WP:WPSCH#Featured articles.Greg Comlish (talk) 04:27, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: One thing to bear in mind when looking at FA's is when it became FA.  Articles that recently achieved FA status are far better guides than older ones as the process has become far more refined and stringent in the last few years.  This one was promoted 5 years ago and reviewed 3 years ago.  Also, just because an FA article has something doesn't mean every article should also have the same or needs it.  In regards to your specific commonalities, note that it dated the accolades rather than simply saying "is nationally ranked".  I stated above that the rankings could be in the lead for LAHS provided they are in proper context of the summary of the article and are specifically dated since rankings are only valid for one year and can change drastically from year to year.  I would actually remove "strong" in that lead because it really isn't needed.  In fact, looking at the article, it needs a lot of touch-up work.  When I went to check the sources for these claims, I found most of them either don't work or don't have the quote listed.  The lead in that article could also be a little longer and if it were reviewed today that would be a fault (believe me, I've taken articles through FA...ugh!), but do note it does have a basic 3-paragraph structure and in a VERY basic way summarizes the article.  I personally like the Amador Valley High School article lead as it highlights some achievements without using overly promotional language.  The article was promoted to FA status a bit more recently too (November 2009).  --JonRidinger (talk) 05:02, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you object if I added a specifically-dated ranking of the school in the lede?  Or would you feel this alone would lack "proper context"?  Greg Comlish (talk) 15:49, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Remember, the purpose of the lead is to give an introduction to the article; basically a very general summary.  If all you add is a ranking, then yes, it will seem out of place and serve not as a summary but a "look at how great we are" kind of thing.  I would add it in a general sense, like "LAHS has been recognized as a top U.S. high school by..."  To see how I did it, see the lead at Theodore Roosevelt High School (Kent, Ohio).  That school was also named in a report by US News in 2010.  It's a very general mention.  --JonRidinger (talk) 18:01, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

text:  Tedder, you suggested that you would rewrite the lede for this article.  Is this still on your agenda? Greg Comlish (talk) 15:18, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I just added my rewrite. tedder (talk) 03:48, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Lede

message: If you aren't sure what to put, I think you can easily just remove that sentence.  Keep the median income and other key statistics from the county and, as I've said for other things, let the reader make the decision about middle class.  Middle class doesn't have a clear definition (there isn't a government definition like we have for poverty).  Remember too, if you have "is considered" or "can be considered" that needs a source that actually uses that terminology ("middle class").  You could (and should) also put the racial and gender statistics into prose with the rest of the paragraph.  --JonRidinger (talk) 18:42, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle class 

message: It has been asked that I re-assess this article; I think the ratings are fine as they are, but I can provide give some tips for GA. 
Firstly, I took the liberty of cleaning-up the images on Commons and deleting the duplicate uploads left behind here. These images are an asset to the article and go beyond what would be needed to pass the WP:GAC. The image quality is good too, though a colour version of :File:JFK Memorial.jpg would be great. Given the amount of images, a gallery on Commons might be appropriate at commons:Los Alamos High School to in order to supplement the category, see commons:COM:GALLERY. 
Both non-free images used have rationales, though what is the purpose of :File:TheTopperman.jpg? It doesn't seem to be supporting any content, and on my resolution it creeps into the references section resulting in ugly white space to the right of the references, which should be avoided if possible. If this image is to be kept, it should probably be moved to a more appropriate section of the article, with such a section created if needed. Note that GA reviewers will check non-free images against the WP:NFCC, and I could hence see this image being an issue in a GA review due to criterion eight of this policy ("Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding.") - a criterion that, while open to interpretation, can catch a lot of non-free uploads out.
The current lead is good but it is a little short for an article of this size, and will need expanding. A finished FA article would have a lead of two to three paragraphs, see Amador Valley High School as an example (this school also has a Commons gallery example) and WP:LEAD for guidance. The history section is detailed and well written. While this is trivial, when using piped links make it clear to the reader where they will end up when they click on the link per WP:EGG. So in this case, if Cold War is going to be linked, then Cold War should probably be stated in the link (e.g. in order to counter a rising Soviet threat -> due to the Cold War). There appear to be some gaps in the referencing still, such as in the curriculum section. Really for GA everything needs a citation except the absolutely obvious per WP:V, even if this means citing the school website.
Finally, I would suggest looking at WP:WPSCH/AG for further guidance, in particular WP:WPSCH/AG#S for suggestions on possible missing sections and the standard article layout. CT Cooper · talk 19:37, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes a good point. I also removed the word "new" from the discription of the school logo on its file page on Commons for similar reasons. CT Cooper · talk 20:11, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-assessment 

message: Along with the above (all great suggestions), I tagged the sentence about the "newly remodeled" R-wing for clarification.  Be careful to avoid statements that can quickly become dated.  How recently was "newly"?  Best thing to do here is state when it was remodeled "...the R-wing (previously the cafeteria), which was remodeled in (insert year or years here)."  That way the sentence will always be true no matter how much time asses. Also I removed one instance, but watch out for using seasons to identify dates, like "the work will be done in fall 2011".  "Fall" is first a mostly American term, but even more so, it is a POV term.  Autumn in New Mexico isn't Autumn everywhere in the world.  Use the month (or even date) wherever possible.  If that's not available, simply using a phrase like "late 2011" is appropriate.  --JonRidinger (talk) 19:57, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes a good point. I also removed the word "new" from the discription of the school logo on its file page on Commons for similar reasons. CT Cooper · talk 20:11, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification

message: The source for Lynn Bjorklund doesn't establish that she went to LAHS, it just states she was from Los Alamos.  "The 3,000m record of 9:08.6, held by Lynn Bjorklund of Los Alamos, N.M., was set back in 1975..."  While that's my first concern (living in Los Alamos does not guarantee she attended the school), the second is notability itself.  Setting a high school track record is cool and all, but unless there are some other sources and notable achievements, I really don't see how this person will ever meet the notability guidelines as setting one record (particularly at the high school level) does not automatically make the person notable.  The point of these notable alumni lists is mainly to connect articles that wouldn't otherwise be connected.  The lists really aren't a good place to try and establish notability; that should be done in an actual article and then added to the list.  Too often, especially high school articles, "notable alumni" is translated into "successful alumni" and people who have done well, regardless of notability, are included even though notable is different than successful.  Remember, having a source does not establish notability.  --JonRidinger (talk) 00:55, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Jon.  Take another look at the source.  In "Running Times" High School news they nearly always refer to the name of the high school without the redundant term "High School".  Saying Lynn is from Los Alamos is equivalent to saying that she is from Los Alamos High School just like when they said "West Windsor Plainsboro North" they are actually referring to the high school West Windsor-Plainsboro High School North.  It's the same convention that United States high school national records in track and field used when they cited Lynn's record fromhere.  Regarding notability, a 36 year old unbroken national athletic record likely qualifies because it has been duly noted by numerous publications.  She also has some other long-standing records for some well-known races like Pikes Peak Marathon.   Plus Lynn was profiled in depth in Reader's Digest after at 18 mile run that saved two people's lives, so there's that too.  Not sure which one is more notable, although maybe a more general label might be appropriate.  Greg Comlish (talk) 04:33, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I did take another look and while I see your point, there are several uses of "High" or "Academy" with a school name ("...national 800m champion Ajee Wilson of Neptune High in New Jersey...", "...Chad Noelle of Greene High in New York...", "...Matt Jablonski of Loyola Academy in Maryland.").  When the state name follows a city, the author is referring to a place ("...at New Balance Nationals in Greensboro, N.C., in June.").  The instance of West Windsor-Plainsboro North uses "of" New Jersey rather than the same way "Los Alamos, N.M." is used.  So, yes, I think the author is referencing the city of Los Alamos rather than the high school.  All I would want is another source to verify, like a yearbook or some other reliable source.  But again, if you're certain this can pass notability the place to assert notability is in an actual article, not this list.  Holding records, again, does not automatically confer notability.  Remember, notability is not temporary, so two mentions in the 1970s likely doesn't meet notability. And it's not just passing mentions of a record; I'm talking about instances where Lynn has had articles written about her, her career, her life, etc. over an extended period of time or by several different media outlets.  Setting a record is a remarkable achievement, but that in itself I don't think will meet notability.  What would happen if it's broken?  Would we ever hear about this person ever again?  I would definitely try and see if you could request an article at WP:RA, write one yourself, or see if someone else can from WP:WPBIO.  The same is true for Steven Preeg.  Yes, he has a great accomplishment, but is there anything else about him that would make him notable?  Not everyone on every movie crew is notable, even Oscar-winnning teams.  It's similar to bands that are notable, but the individual members really aren't on their own.  Doesn't mean they'll never be notable, but it does mean they currently aren't.  --JonRidinger (talk) 20:29, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Jon, the second source that Lynn Bjorklund went to LAHS is here.  And, as noted before, Lynn has had ongoing media exposure including an article on her life in Readers Digest ("A run for their lives" by Maynard, Lee, 1998), so that would appear to satisfy your personal criteria for notability.  Yes, the article could and should convey that notability in a better fashion.  Lynn should have her own article given the significant media coverage she has had, and that can be addressed in due time.  I'm also going to disagree with you on Steve Preeg.  The guy won an Oscar.  That alone makes him notable.  And he wasn't just another "crew member" -- you make him sound like he was an extra.  Preeg was one of only four people on the crew to get the award.  Look at his entry on IMDB .  He looks like he's one of the more accomplished and established special effects guys in Hollywood. Greg Comlish (talk) 19:37, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the additional source.  Personally, I would use that source in this article to avoid any confusion.  You can also use both (you could have one citation with a "see also" link attached to the main citation), but definitely have one that specifically mentions LAHS.  As for "my criteria", they're not my criteria.  Please make sure you read Wikipedia's policy on Notability, in particular, the General notability guideline and Notability is not temporary sections.  Be sure to also read Subjects notable only for one event and the section for WP:NTRACK which addresses Track & Field athletes specifically.  I'm not totally sure she would qualify for #7: "Has at any time held a world or continental record (including world junior records, world youth bests and masters age-group world records) ratified or noted by the appropriate official body." but it's worth a try in seeing if she would since she holds the US record (she also holds records for the Pikes Peak Marathon so that will help too, see http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703960004575427561884547420.html).  I'd be happy to help get a stub started or at least inquire.  Notability applies in creating an article and in list inclusion.  Again, the place to assert that notability would be actual articles on each individual, not on a high school notable alumni list.  It wasn't your explanation in this article that made me question notability, it was the red links on the names and the sources provided. Lists like this should contain a link to the article on that person and a very brief sentence/statement or two as to why they're notable (i.e. not a paragraph that needs to explain in detail why they're notable), because the subject of this article is the high school, not the individual who happened to go there.  For examples, you can see what I did at Theodore Roosevelt High School (Kent, Ohio)#Notable alumni. --JonRidinger (talk) 01:04, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Jon.  I added a few extra details to Lynn's article.  I'll try and get a stub going for Steve Preeg too.  Greg Comlish (talk) 15:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lynn Bjorklund 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Los Alamos High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110306164721/http://www.laschools.net:80/145910510141723360/site/default.asp to http://www.laschools.net/145910510141723360/site/default.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101128011432/http://laschools.net/145910614125826937/Blog/browse.asp?C=57441&A=398&DomainID=2710&Month=5&Year=2010 to http://www.laschools.net/145910614125826937/Blog/browse.asp?C=57441&A=398&DomainID=2710&Month=5&Year=2010
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:57, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Los Alamos High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110103233737/http://laschools.net/14591075121620173/Blog/browse.asp?C=54657&A=398&DomainID=1771&PostID=1643 to http://www.laschools.net/14591075121620173/Blog/browse.asp?C=54657&A=398&DomainID=1771&PostID=1643
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101128012240/http://laschools.net/145910614125826937/Blog/browse.asp?C=57441&A=398&DomainID=2710&Month=10&Year=2010 to http://www.laschools.net/145910614125826937/Blog/browse.asp?C=57441&A=398&DomainID=2710&Month=10&Year=2010
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110716004554/http://www.santafenewmexican.com/Leisure/Mitote-030109 to http://www.santafenewmexican.com/Leisure/Mitote-030109
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Los Alamos High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110724000844/http://www.laschools.net/145910614125826937/Blog/browse.asp?C=57441&A=398&DomainID=2710&Month=0&Year=0&Page=5 to http://www.laschools.net/145910614125826937/Blog/browse.asp?C=57441&A=398&DomainID=2710&Month=0&Year=0&Page=5
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110723180545/http://www.laschools.net/14591075121620173/Blog/browse.asp?C=54657&A=398&DomainID=1771&Month=5 to http://www.laschools.net/14591075121620173/Blog/browse.asp?C=54657&A=398&DomainID=1771&Month=5
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:16, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Los Alamos High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.lcni5.com/cgi-bin/c2.cgi?075%20article%20News%2020091219185059075075004
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140512224456/http://www.nmact.org/file/Soccer%20Boys%20Coaches%20Champions.pdf to http://www.nmact.org/file/Soccer%20Boys%20Coaches%20Champions.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140512222024/http://www.nmact.org/file/Soccer%20Girls%20Coaches%20Champions.pdf to http://www.nmact.org/file/Soccer%20Girls%20Coaches%20Champions.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140512223644/http://www.nmact.org/file/Swimming%20Boys%20Coaches%20Champions.pdf to http://www.nmact.org/file/Swimming%20Boys%20Coaches%20Champions.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140513010830/http://www.nmact.org/file/Swimming%20Girls%20Coaches%20Champions.pdf to http://www.nmact.org/file/Swimming%20Girls%20Coaches%20Champions.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140512224134/http://www.nmact.org/file/Wrestling%20Past%20Champions.pdf to http://www.nmact.org/file/Wrestling%20Past%20Champions.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Los Alamos High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160113055737/http://laschools.net/cms/lib07/NM01000458/Centricity/Domain/545/2011-12_Student_Handbook.pdf to http://laschools.net/cms/lib07/NM01000458/Centricity/Domain/545/2011-12_Student_Handbook.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110902031312/http://webapp.ped.state.nm.us/aypdl/docs/2010/041_080_LOS_ALAMOS_PUBLIC_SCHOOLS_LOS_ALAMOS_HIGH_AYP0910_20100728_1450.pdf to http://webapp.ped.state.nm.us/aypdl/docs/2010/041_080_LOS_ALAMOS_PUBLIC_SCHOOLS_LOS_ALAMOS_HIGH_AYP0910_20100728_1450.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110902031231/http://webapp.ped.state.nm.us/aypdl/docs/2009/041_080_LOS_ALAMOS_PUBLIC_SCHOOLS_LOS_ALAMOS_HIGH_AYP0910_20091016_2035.pdf to http://webapp.ped.state.nm.us/aypdl/docs/2009/041_080_LOS_ALAMOS_PUBLIC_SCHOOLS_LOS_ALAMOS_HIGH_AYP0910_20091016_2035.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110902030919/http://webapp.ped.state.nm.us/aypdl/docs/041_080_LOS_ALAMOS_PUBLIC_SCHOOLS_LOS_ALAMOS_HIGH_AYP0809_20080730_1314.pdf to http://webapp.ped.state.nm.us/aypdl/docs/041_080_LOS_ALAMOS_PUBLIC_SCHOOLS_LOS_ALAMOS_HIGH_AYP0809_20080730_1314.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:25, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified