lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Severe combined immunodeficiency (non-human)

message: This should be moved to Severe combined immunodeficiency (horse). It only deals with the horse variant. X-SCID, a sex-linked SCID is present in canines. I am fairly sure there are other SCID variants present in other animals too. (eg. SCID mouse)--ZayZayEM (talk) 03:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah merging would be fine, and seems a good idea. I have a few papers on Canine X-SCID I might try introduce. --ZayZayEM (talk) 07:46, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it.  I can wordsmith and smooth out any rough spots, but I'm no help on content, I just know the horse disease and genetics 101.  Montanabw(talk) 07:50, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

text: My knowledge of canine SCID is limited, but I can also try to add some info on it.  X-SCID is pretty well described in a laboratory setting due to its similarity to human SCID, but I don't have much on its natural history.  There is an autosomal recessive form in Jack Russell Terriers also, that is similar to the disease in Arabians.  I'll try to work on it tomorrow.  --Joelmills (talk) 01:35, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 
Move
Merge

message: I placed redirects to the relevant sections in the particular organism-specific categories. I think it is more appropriate. These pages are being listed on the category pages, and will direct interested readers to the relevant section directly rather than having to deal with the TOC. I think this works better, but I'm not sure if I'm somehow gaming the system innapropriately.--ZayZayEM (talk) 06:40, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please look at :Category:Arabian and part-Arabian horses and :Category:Dog diseases you will find SCID listed under "S" on both pages. This page is listed under those cats. I do not mind if we unlist the redirects and relist this page, but we should not list this page twice. I think the redirect works better as it uses a title people will be looking for in the place people will be looking for it.--ZayZayEM (talk) 05:41, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I am OK with not listing the page twice and my concern is that the redirect trick is not going to be deemed "legal" by the wikigods.  I won't revert the article again, but I am really concerned that your redirect is not going to be "legal" given the wiki guidelines on double redircts.  I do fear that getting tossed. Read Wikipedia:Double_redirects and see what you think.  Montanabw(talk) 19:21, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think categorizing the redirects is fine.  I've done it plenty over the last two years without any problems.  --Joelmills (talk) 00:17, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK.  I'm cool with it, then.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Montanabw (talk • contribs) 17:52, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not sure if this was legal
Talk:Glen Eden Intermediate School

message: I am interested in looking at the detail on the page to ensure it is current and that the links are all working.  Feel free to jump into this discussion. I won't do anything before talking with the principal of the school.Realitylink (talk) 03:39, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

message: Hi folks, have a look at the sections I have created.  There is a lot of work to be done in finding more citations and particularly historical information.  I will re-look at this in a day or so, some of the placement of information may be questionable?  The section on pedagogy is slim - not sure where I would find more on this?  Realitylink (talk) 07:07, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modifying the body - lede too cluttered.
Talk:HIV Rev response element

message: Here, "Rev" seems to be a reference to a protein, and I am told that proteins are usually uppercased by convention. In sources I can read:
* "The kinetics of interaction between the human immunodeficiency virus-1 Rev protein and its RNA target, Rev response element (RRE)" and 
*"HIV-1 Rev protein directs nuclear export of pre-mRNAs and mRNAs containing its binding site, the Rev response element (RRE)", so I assume that the "Rev" is the title must be a protein.  
And yes, those sources do differentiate between Rev (protein) and rev (gene), for example. "The Rev protein is absolutely essential for HIV replication (for a review see reference 49). Proviral clones lacking a functional rev gene have (...)"
And I was able to check 20 of the references, and 19 of them capitalized the "Rev" in RRE. --Enric Naval (talk) 14:05, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  capitalizating "Rev" in the name
Talk:List of Olympic medalists in freestyle wrestling

message: I think it should split men and women and not greco-roman and freestyle. —Preceding unsigned comment added by David Krysakowski (talk • contribs) 
:I don't think a men/women split is at all useful.  It reduces the size of this list from 88K to 86K, so why even make a split in the first place?  If this article is to be split for size-related reasons, a Greco-Roman and freestyle split would result in two articles approximately the same size, which is much more sensible.  — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 17:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split
Talk:Formula E (disambiguation)

message: Now it looks like Formula E will happen I have crated a draft page and will ask for this page to be moved to Formula E (disambiguation) and my new page moved to Formula E.  米 (talk) 10:41, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: draft stub page  [[User:米/Formula_E]]

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Comment this is a badly malformed multimove request. Destination and sources are both screwed up. -- 76.65.128.252 (talk) 13:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Unicomp

message: If you try to get on the website, it shows a 403 Forbidden Error. (on 12-08-07) Iceage6891 (talk) 03:35, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now it redirects to the online store, with a note that they're remodeling the site. (About time, that thing looked like it was stuck in the mid-90s) -- Stormwatch (talk) 02:17, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Link Broken?
Talk:Hfq protein

message: I was going to suggest changing the table of known targets. The current table on first impression looks like rows of RNA -> target rather than a list of sRNAs that are known to interact with Hfq. I would rename it something like "Bacterial Hfq binding sRNAs". I also wanted to be able to add the names of the new ones identified by Sittka et al (pmid=18725932 Hfq deep sequencing paper).
I agree the title of the table is a bit misleading. Go ahead and extend the table! Alexbateman (talk) 09:12, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Histone 3′ UTR stem-loop

message: I am a student in a program which utilizes Wikipedia as part of an educational assignment. I'm quite interested in expanding upon this page as there is much that could be added. For example, in a review in 2003 "Translational control by the 3′-UTR: the ends specify the means", this topic is spoken of in much greater detail. One such field that could be worked on is the binding of SLBP and how this affects the mRNA. Much more is spoken of on this topic in the review as well. Here is the full citation: 
    Barsanjit Mazumder, Vasudevan Seshadri, Paul L Fox
    Translational control by the 3′-UTR: the ends specify the means
    Trends in Biochemical Sciences, Volume 28, Issue 2, February 2003, Pages 91–98
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0004(03)00002-1
If anyone is planning on working on this page, please message me as soon as possible as to avoid any overlapping work. DSKireai (talk) 20:53, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Main Street (novel series)

message: I have knowledge to think for a characters section, from what I have read of the 3 stupid books, which I returned  . I have finished 1 it's boring, and I tried my hardest to be good, too many short sentences for the characters.
Annieeee (talk) 04:31, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added a Characters Section 

message: I merged material from these articles: plot summary and character list from Welcome to Camden Falls, plot summaries from 
Needle and Thread, 'Tis the Season (novel) (plus book cover), Best Friends (Martin novel),  The Secret Book Club (earlier version), September Surprises, Keeping Secrets (novel), and Coming Apart (novel). --- Robina Fox (talk) 15:58, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: There should be a settings so people know where they all went 98.214.41.80 (talk) 02:15, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Settings
Talk:IS061 RNA

message: 1/17/17 DennisPietras (talk) 01:51, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  moved out of unassessed on the genetics project 

message: Ooooooo Muhammedsiyad.mk (talk) 06:52, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  siyad
Talk:'Tis the Season (novel)

message: Hey-a. This page should use a disambiguation thingie. For instance, this expression means more than a book, right? I was looking for the history of the expression itself. (I'm gonna ask the USENET.) I wanted to know how "'tis" came about.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.92.12.81 (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sookie Stackhouse

message: Guys? Shouldn't we mention, somewhere, that she's blood-bound to a vampire, and stuff like that? And if the most recent book is the one where she suffers the fate of all Vampire-Romance Novel Protagonists.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.192.153.222 (talk) 15:19, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Species

message: If Niall Brigant is Sookie's great grandfather and the grandfather of Claudine and Claude, Claudine and Claude should be grand aunts and uncles to Sookie or first cousins twice removed. See the Cousin Chart  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sckeener (talk • contribs) 19:27, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not grand aunts or uncles, and not first cousins once removed, either, because they are not descended from Einin (they are full-blooded fae). they are half-first cousins once removed. - UtherSRG (talk) 08:29, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family Tree 

message: Is this series still ongoing or is book #8 the last? Shouldn't this be answered in the article? 88.65.111.170 (talk) 17:38, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A new book will be out May 2009. 62.30.54.79 (talk) 20:38, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ongoing? 

message: Who killed Adele Stackhouse in the book series?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.217.133.167 (talk) 01:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  serial killer? 

message: Currently in last sentence under Family life, it reads "Pam states..."
I don't find where it is stated who Pam is.  Did I miss something, or
can someone who knows please insert that in the appropriate place, please?
168.166.196.40 (talk) 20:04, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Pam, under Family life section? 

message: The article intro could use a parenthetical mention of how "Sookie" is pronounced. If you do a Google search you will see it is a question others are asking, too. Not everyone has seen the series (like me) but the newsstands are full of pictures and articles every week. 5Q5 (talk) 14:25, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation of "Sookie"? 

message: If "Sookie" is a nickname, as the article says, what is it a nickname for? 99.237.143.219 (talk) 18:49, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nickname
Talk:Let-7 microRNA precursor

message: The article is about the let-7 microRNA family - not about a specific let-7 pri-miRNA or pre-miRNA. The name of the article should be changed to "let-7", "let-7 microRNA", "let-7 microRNA family", or similar.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.119.202.121 (talk) 15:28, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change 

message: Israel-led team finds clues to aging in fruit fly testicles A new study led by Hila Toledano of Haifa University helps explain why adult stem cells age and suggests ways to fight it. By Asaf Shtull-Trauring, 2012-07-09
Short of it is let-7 interferes with niche-stem cell communication, stem cells eventually only differentiate rather than produce new stem cell (let-7 stops Imp, which destabilizes Upd, reducing proper self renewal of stem cells). — al-Shimoni (talk) 13:35, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A potential reference lead
Talk:Hutt Valley High School

message: 12TY , one of the bestly known form classes in 2010. has dominated this year  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.152.207.247 (talk) 05:01, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it really necessary to have all of those negative professional attacks on the article? Ffgamera - My page! | Talk to me! | Contribs 11:48, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 
Talk:Formula Ford 1600

message: I'm proposing merging this article into the broader Formula Ford article.  This is a stub on the subject.  The main article isn't overly long so I think most of this information could be added to that article.  Springee (talk) 03:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Opppose'. The summary/main format seems to work well here. The [[Formula Ford 1600] is relative short and unreferenced, but I wouldn't describe it as a stub. The topic itself seems capable of significant expansion. Also, moving all of the sub-articles into Formula Ford would be impractical, so the merge wouldn't be generalisable. Klbrain (talk) 08:11, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into Formula Ford article 

message: While I was updating this I couldn't find anything online about Midlands South and North West series. I'm sure they existed at some point otherwise they would not be mentioned but if they do not exist anymore should those paragraphs be deleted? Also if anyone can find info on those then could you please update I spent almost an hour looking and only found a facebook page. RacerAli21 (talk) 20:34, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Midlands South and North West series
Talk:Mir-133 microRNA precursor family

message: Here are a few thoughts on things that could be done:
It would be good to add a discussion on the role of miR-133 in disease.
List of targets could get long, so consider converting to a bullet pointed list or table. Should information be added on the experimental technique used to validate targets?
Alexbateman (talk) 12:19, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Topics to add
Talk:James Hargest College

message: I have removed several such tags which contradicted obvious and true information, which can be verified by simply observing those things within the school. I don't believe it's likely to be challenged, as per the relevant policy. It's not exactly something that can be cited.
However, I would request that the (correct) assertion of the Senior Campus being bigger and having more students be cited. I'm sure it will be documented somewhere, and it is the type of statement that needs a source in spite of however accurate it may be.
If you put those tags back in, please leave a note here so the matter can be resolved. 125.237.26.48 (talk) 04:28, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ridiculously placed [citation needed] tags
Talk:Laing Middle School

message: - I had trouble with the lists on this page, can anyone help?
- It's ight, dawg. We got yo back. Dizzy and Fizzy be trippin' up in this peace, y'all. If you think you in danger, than Twisted Metaphors' rhymes will fix that shit up! x]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.145.80.105 (talk) 08:36, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Mir-219 microRNA precursor family

message: New research discusses how mir-219 plays an important role in development of oligodendrocytes in the brain. Research is continuing into mir-219 deficiency possibly being the cause for certain kinds of brain cancer. Might not be solid enough information for the article yet, but this is an active area of study with multiple sources involved if anyone wants to watch- http://med.stanford.edu/ism/2010/march/barres.html --science journalism article 66.41.6.181 (talk) 10:48, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John McGlashan College

message: What year was Gilray established?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.135.226.55 (talk) 14:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Mir-29 microRNA precursor

message: Hi, editors of this article!: I´m not a specialist in this topic, nor related ones, but I found this recent news that I believe could be of interest to you, although it is not about the precursor but about the mir-29, instead.
Also, perhaps references to this article should be created under the titles "microRNA-29" and "miR-29", if they don´t exist already and you don´t plan to create an article on the final microRNA, different from this one on the precursor.
Pmronchi (talk) 03:13, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  News on mir-29 and neuron´s apoptosis: New molecule could save brain cells from neurodegeneration, stroke
Talk:Mir-92 microRNA precursor family

message: For this revision, please check the source(s) to determine whether it (or they) refer(s) to "four-day-old ... cells" (cells that were four days old) or whether it (or they) refer(s) to "four day-old ... cells" (four cells that were a day old). 
—Wavelength (talk) 20:12, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number and age of cells 
Talk:Formula 600

message: Formula 440 should be split off into a separate article. It would reduce the table size to a more readable size, and separate out 440cc engines into a proper article. -- 65.94.170.98 (talk) 01:50, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: We have separate articles for F3 Europe and FR Europe, GP3 and the new international F3, GP2 and the new international F2, so why shouldn't we have separate articles for F500 and F440? -- 65.93.183.33 (talk) 10:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: [[F440]]
Talk:Giorgi Shashiashvili

message: #09.05.2001
#15.08.2001
#27.03.2002
#17.04.2002
#21.08.2002
#12.02.2003
#29.03.2003 Euro 2004
#30.04.2003 Euro 2004
#18.02.2004
#19.02.2004
#21.02.2004
#09.02.2005
#22.03.2006
#16.08.2006 Euro 2008
#11.10.2006 Euro 2008 
#15.11.2006
#07.02.2007
#24.03.2007 Euro 2008
#28.03.2007 Euro 2008
#06.06.2007 Euro 2008
#13.10.2007 Euro 2008
#17.10.2007 Euro 2008
#16.11.2007
#26/03/2008
#06/09/2008 World Cup 2010
#11/10/2008 World Cup 2010
#15/10/2008 World Cup 2010
#19/11/2008
#28/03/2009 World Cup 2010
Matthew_hk tc 16:14, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Caps
Talk:David Siradze

message: #18.02.2004
#27.05.2004
#15.11.2006
#07.02.2007 
#24.03.2007 EURO 2008
#28.03.2007  EURO 2008
#22.08.2007
#08.09.2007  EURO 2008
#13.10.2007 EURO 2008
#17.10.2007  EURO 2008
#21.11.2007
#06/02/2008
#06/09/2008 World Cup 2010
#10/09/2008 World Cup 2010
#15/10/2008 World Cup 2010
#11/02/2009 World Cup 2010
#28/03/2009 World Cup 2010
#01/04/2009 World Cup 2010
Matthew_hk tc 17:58, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Caps
Talk:Trinity Catholic College, Dunedin

message: I added a link to an article about convicted paedophile Father Magnus Murray and discussed the recent spotlighting of St Paul's with the Catholic Church sexual abuse cases -- I have trird to maintain Wikipedia's standard of neutrality but happy to discuss here any way in which wording could be better. I have not named the other alleged offenders eg Glen, Thompson, Henery etc as they remain merely allegations, while Murray was convicted and Fay (along with Murray) was acknowledged by the Bishop as an offender in his letter to parishioners. In good faith, Nankai (talk) 03:58, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Added content re historic abuse
Talk:Treaty of Manila (1946)

message: I've just created this article. The name, Treaty of Manila (1946), is my own invention and I am only guessing that this name is appropriate since I have this naming convention used in other articles about treaties. I haven't found any references to this particular treaty in or out of Wikipedia as the "Treaty of Manila". For a possibly relevant sidebar item regarding naming of treaties, see this New York Times article titled "Treaty of What's Its Name". -- Boracay Bill (talk) 04:02, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I included a section that discusses the continued limitations on Philippine independence by the US after the "Treaty of Manila" was implemented. The original page states: "The United States granted the Philippines full independence, and the treaty provided for the recognition of that independence". But "full" independence was not achieved. The US retained several military bases and even made extraterritorial attempts by asking to regain criminal jurisdiction over offenses made by US military personnel.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pecmiraflores (talk • contribs) 05:05, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added "Limitations" section 

message: I added several paragraphs discussing the lead-up to the Treaty of Manila, clarifying the political actions which took place in the decades before to lead to independence. I also added more information about why the United States decided to voluntarily relinquish control. I created a new Treaty Provisions section since nowhere did the article actually delineate what the treaty implied. --Louisbrickman (talk) 06:04, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fleshed out the "Background" section and added "Treaty Provisions" section 

message: Here, I've made a number of changes to the Background section, some substantive and some not.
*I removed a citation of the WP Philippine Declaration of Independence article as a supporting source.
*I removed an assertion saying that Filipino rebels had already gained control of the entire Philippine archipelago with the exception of Intramuros by the time of the battle, and the cite of the WP Philippine Revolution article in support. That article does not support the assertion, and WP articles are not reliable sources in any case.
*The article asserted that the May 1 battle marked the fall of Spanish inshore defenses in the Philippines and the alliance between American troops and Aguinaldo's Philippine Revolutionary Army. At the time of the battle, Aguinaldo was in Singapore intending to travel onwards to Paris and the PRA had been transformed into an irregular force as a result of the Pact of Biak-na-Bato. I tried to clear that up.
*I removed an assertion saying that Aguinaldo's declaration of Philippine independence formed the First Philippine Republic and ended 333 years of Spanish colonial rule; it did not do either of those things.
This needs more work. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 18:04, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits to the Background section