Talk:Brooks & Dunn

message: A lot of the singles were out of order, had incorrect peaks (e. g. #2 for "Lost And Found", which was actually a #6), etc. I went back and fixed the singles list. (And as a bonus, all of the songs - with the possible exception of the Christmas songs - are in chronological order, too.) 68.188.191.9 19:36, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fixed the singles section

message: I just reverted what I thought was vandalism to the page...but if not, please revert. Thanks!--ViolinGirl♪ 21:46, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverting Question

message: The article seems to be very light on information about Brooks and Dunn as artists, both as individuals and as a duo, and heavy on inconsequentials.  Is it really necessary to have all of the songs from their albums listed?  Willbyr 19:23, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Content of article

message: Although I'm the fool user who merged Kix' and Ronnie's pages to this one in the first place, I would like to know: Does anyone think that their pages should be split back off again? Both Kix and Ronnie seem to have enough standalone notability to warrant separate articles, in my opinion -- especially now that the former is a nationally syndicated radio host. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 21:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 18:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag 

message: There's not nearly enough info on their career. Each album should have its own section, regarding the singles, critical reception, etc. Also, there aren't nearly enough sources. Come on, I'm not the only one who can write a country music GA here. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 19:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand 

message: Wow, no discussion in 2 years? This article sure has gathered a lot of dust. Also, sourcedump for later expansion: http://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks%3A1&tbo=1&q=%22brooks+%26+dunn%22+%22billboard%22&btnG=Search+Books#q=%22brooks+%26+dunn%22+%22billboard%22&hl=en&tbo=1&tbs=bks:1&ei=KSm1TLeoE4TdnAfW-8Vq&start=20&sa=N&fp=56a5412bf1193579 Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 03:37, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcedump 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Brooks & Dunn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110612144335/http://www.yamaha.com/publications/allaccess/summer2001/02cook.htm to http://www.yamaha.com/publications/allaccess/summer2001/02cook.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:41, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified