Talk:Vermilion Parish, Louisiana

message: I reverted the alleged “conflict of interest” because Mr. Harder fails to provide any hard, verifiable, and reliable evidence or documentation to support his speculation that the URLs that I posted are an actual conflict of interest. In my opinion, he has removed the below links, which are pertinent to this parish, without any clear, stated justification or reason for claiming that a “conflict of interest” has occurred.
*Heinrich, P. V., 2006, White Lake 30 x 60 minute geologic quadrangle. Louisiana Geological Survey, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
*Heinrich, P. V., J. Snead, and R. P. McCulloh, 2003, Crowley 30 x 60 minute geologic quadrangle. Louisiana Geological Survey, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
(Note: there are two citations because each quadrangle contains a significant piece of Vermilion Parish, Louisiana)
First, the original concern about a conflict of interest on my talk page was about an article cited in the Bosnian pyramids, which is a very controversial topic, and that I cited a popular, non-peer-review article that had serious and valid concerns about it meeting the Wikipedia standards for criteria for verifiability and reliability. Given the lack of any serious controversy about the current geologic mapping of Louisiana that has been published in the peer-reviewed literature, I am not promoting my point of view over another point of view by putting links to the PDF files of geologic maps to the web pages from which he reverted them. There is no conflict for me to have a conflict of interest in. I am just putting links to where people can find free PDF files of geologic maps that cover these parishes. I fail to see where a conflict of interest exists in providing URLs to where people can find free, peer-reviewed information about the geology of these parishes.
Second, given that the Quaternary geology of Louisiana is my specialty, it is very difficult, if not impossible, to add links up-to-date publications about the geology of southern Louisiana without referencing my own publications. If he would look at the publications that I have added, none of them are self-published. Before publication, as is official policy of the publisher, they have all been intensively peer-reviewed by geologists both inside and outside of the publisher. 
If was to write a short paragraph about the geology of each parish, I would have to, in addition to the peer-reviewed publications of other geologists, also cite my own peer-reviewed publications, to provide an accurate and up-to-date summary of what has been said about the geology of the area. If I write for Wikipedia about something, which I am expert in, i.e. the Geology of the Louisiana coastal plain, it would be essential that I would reference some of the papers that I have published about Louisiana geology. 
Finally, Louisiana references that he reverted all meet the criteria for verifiability and reliability. For example, references to hard copies of the geologic maps that I provided links to all can be found in either Geologic Quadrangle Maps (1:100,000) or Open-File Geologic Quadrangle Maps (1:100,000). Hard copies of the information circulars, to which I posted links are listed at Public Information Series. The links to the PDf files of the posted publication are officially online at Maps and Public Information Series.Paul H. (talk) 12:37, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Alledged Conflict of Interest

message: We readers don't get it.  "Bow" as in "bow before me, puny humans!" or "bow" as in "bow tie"?  We get the "aw" as in "straw" or "saw", but what the heck is a short "n"?  Are you trying to say that, instead of pronouncing the "n" separately, you just nasalize the vowel, as French people tend to do?  You know, "educashaw(n)" for "education"? Chrisrus (talk) 19:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "bow-stawn" with a short "n" 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Vermilion Parish, Louisiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110531210815/http://www.naco.org/Counties/Pages/FindACounty.aspx to http://www.naco.org/Counties/Pages/FindACounty.aspx
*Added  tag to http://www.census.gov/geo/maps-data/data/docs/gazetteer/counties_list_22.txt
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Vermilion Parish, Louisiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130928155956/http://www.census.gov/geo/maps-data/data/docs/gazetteer/counties_list_22.txt to http://www.census.gov/geo/maps-data/data/docs/gazetteer/counties_list_22.txt
*Added  tag to http://www.lgs.lsu.edu/deploy/uploads/White%20Lake%20100K.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100628125032/http://www.lgs.lsu.edu/deploy/uploads/Crowley%20100K.pdf to http://www.lgs.lsu.edu/deploy/uploads/Crowley%20100K.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:18, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: At the end, someone has written that not giving a pay raise to the teachers in the parish is justified because blah blah blah. That is a value judgment, a viewpoint and it is the school board's. It should be stated as such. Capitaine Planète (talk) 15:22, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the text, as you are correct that it does not conform to our neutral point of view policy. Thank you for the heads up! –FlyingAce✈hello 15:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page violates the neutral viewpoint policy