Talk:View of the Hebrews

message: Thx for the references :) --Trödel 20:37, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome.  You helped improve the article.--John Foxe 20:41, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Addition of references

message: There seems to be some attempt here to categorize "View of the Hebrews" as an anti-Mormon work. It cannot be categorized in this manner since it was published prior to the publication of the Book of Mormon. Although it is referenced by church critics, there is nothing anti-Mormon about the book itself. In fact, Brigham Young University's Religious Studies Center republished the book in 1999 in order to make it more accessible to those who wish to evaluate these claims for themselves. In addition to listing the B.H. Roberts info regarding parallels, it would be good to list some of the points which are significantly different between the two books (e.g. Ethan Smith's assumption that Quetzocoatal was Moses, whereas the Book of Mormon describes the visit of Jesus Christ).Bochica 15:07, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorization of "View of the Hebrews"

message: I've probably used the wrong tag here to mark this, but the reference to 2 Esdras 13:14 is not correct. The KJV (which I'm assuming was the bible version a Congregationalist in 19th century New England would be using) of this verse reads:
Thou hast shewed thy servant these wonders from the beginning, and hast counted me worthy that thou shouldest receive my prayer: 
I'll look around; see if I can find the right verse. Perhaps it's a simple typo and some of the numbers got reversed or something. Snocrates 22:24, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks to Visorstuff for correcting that. Snocrates 22:31, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Scriptural citation

message: Johnpacklambert has attempted to add a new section to the article based on non-peer reviewed apologetic material written by LDS Church members.  I have no problem with a sentence explaining that the LDS Church disagrees with the scholarly view of this question and that cites Church apologetic works. In fact, such a sentence already exists.  Adding more non-peer reviewed material to that citation is fine. But no non-Mormon scholarship supports the LDS view, and therefore the views of the Church are not supported by "academic and peer-reviewed publications," "reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy."--John Foxe (talk) 14:51, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User: Johnpacklambert|Johnpacklambert's]] revision 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on View of the Hebrews. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100619212828/http://irr.org/mit/view-of-the-hebrews-ch4b.html to http://www.irr.org/mit/view-of-the-hebrews-ch4b.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140331161942/https://byustudies.byu.edu/PDFViewer.aspx?title=6633&linkURL=39.1MorrisOliver-8f403b91-8468-424d-8789-a99672f16e4b.pdf to https://byustudies.byu.edu/PDFViewer.aspx?title=6633&linkURL=39.1MorrisOliver-8f403b91-8468-424d-8789-a99672f16e4b.pdf
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060905221220/http://farms.byu.edu/display.php?table=review&id=44 to http://farms.byu.edu/display.php?table=review&id=44
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified