Talk:John Diefenbaker

message: Can anyone provide evidence to support this statement: "Joe Clark became the first prime minister to eulogize another during the burial services"?  70.48.170.216 23:19, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clark Eulogy 

message: The wiki page on the Nickle Resolution states that Dief was made a Member of the Order of Merit and the Trudeau was a Companion of Honour, however on Dief's postnominals it says CH instead of OM.  Which is correct ? Dowew 20:17, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of Merit or Companion of Honour? 

message: Dief never made it to France. He never saw action in the trenches. As much as I loved him and his Vision for Canada, I cannot let this go misreported in the article. For validation, see "Rogue Tory" by Denis Smith, ISBN# 0-921912-92-7. Dief claimed an injury whilst in training in England, spitting blood, and was discharged back to Canada where he was further judged unfit for Military Service due to heart irregularities. I have corrected that article to reflect this reality. (Posted by TrulyTory, 3 December 2005)
Can 16 months in the Army truly be considered "brief"? Granted he never saw combat but it seems strange to say that, considering he did become an officer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by McDingus (talk • contribs) 04:10, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Point well taken. Correction made. Thanks. Instant Comma (talk) 14:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military Service 

message: Any sustantiation for the claim that this was controversial?  Diefenbaker was 83 and frail when Clark assumed the premiership, and I don't recall there being any serious discussion of his inclusion in cabinet.  - Fishhead64, 05 Feb 2006
:I'd be curious about the seating. Members are seated in proximity to the speaker by precedence, although everyone in cabinet is seated in the front and second rows around the prime minister, closeness to the PM roughly determined by precedence again. Was Diefenbaker assigned a seat near the Speaker, or out in the middle as close as possible to Clark without being among the cabinet ministers?
:And yes, Diefenbaker did have a seat in the 31st Parliament - one of the last photos taken of him was of him sitting at his seat in Parliament, which had not yet been called into session. Presumably, after Clark's cabinet was sworn in on June 4, the house officials started figuring out where everyone would be sitting and attached their name plates. GBC (talk) 00:52, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The photo I looked at last night shows him standing at the side opposite the Speaker of the eighth desk from the Speaker in the front row, so the sixteenth seat from the Speaker.  So I imagine it is the latter.  Presumably not too close to Clark as the two did not get along.  I don't think anyone would have expected him to be in the Clark cabinet, he was 83 and apparently suffered a mild stroke during the campaign though his people covered it up by saying he had gotten the flu.--Wehwalt (talk) 12:49, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exclusion from Clark cabinet 

message: Edna Mae Brower was born in 1899, not 1901.
Between his election to the Wakaw Town Council in 1920 and his election to Parliament in 1940, Mr. Diefenbaker was a losing candidate in five elections.  They were: the Federal Elections of 1925 and 1926, the Saskatchewan Provincial Elections of 1929 and 1938, and the Prince Albert Mayoral Race in 1933.  He never ran for office in Alberta.
Mr. Diefenbaker first mounted a campaign for Leader of the Conservative Party in 1942, and lost to John Bracken in the Convention of that year.  The Leadership Convention was not held in 1943.
Mr. Diefenbaker's courageous stand against apartheid took place at the 1961 Commonwealth Prime Ministers' Conference, not the 1962 Conference. PeterNixon 00:12, 9 December 2006.
As a matter purely of style, I can't tell from reading the early list of accomplishments whether Dief founded or abolished the Economic Council of Canada.  It sounds as if he should be credited with founding it, but the verb immediately before it is 'abolished', with reference to the Avro Arrow program.  Maybe the note about the ECC could be moved to before the mention of the Avro Arrow? The decision about the ECC is not mentioned elsewhere on the page, e.g. in the description of Dief's time as PM. Johndgregory (talk) 03:55, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracies On This Page 

message: Was Dief the first Canadian PM with military service? None of the previous PM's articles mention any time in uniform. --SigPig |SEND - OVER 07:37, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First PM with military service? 

message: :Image:Diefenbaker Time Magazine.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:23, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The current content of the page does not allow for a meaningful fair use rationale, as the issue of Time Magazine is nowhere discussed. I've furthermore downgraded to B-class, because this article lacks in-line citations completely (which is a prerequisite for A-class). Sorry. Errabee 13:44, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Diefenbaker Time Magazine.jpg

message: This page is in the 'Orange Order' and 'Orangemen' categories, but doesn't say that Diefenbaker was an Orangeman. I know nothing about the guy, but the page should either mention he was in the Orange Order or be removed from those categories. --Helenalex 20:02, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He was a member of a lot of things, see below.--Wehwalt (talk) 10:25, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That is not a reliable third party source. 117Avenue (talk) 06:45, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

text: If there's something scholarly pointing out the significance, I would have no objection.--Wehwalt (talk) 19:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orange Order 

message: I am not sure that the listing of the | honorific-suffix = PC CH QC LLD (hc, McM) LLD (hc, StM) LLD (hc, UBC) LLD (hc, UNB) LLD (hc, PU) LLD (hc, UofT) LLD (hc, UW) LLD (hc, QU) LLD (hc, Dal) LLD (hc, MUN) LLD (hc, WLU) LLD (hc, UA) DCL (hc, Sask) DCL (hc, UWO) MA LLB BA FRSC FRSA in the infobox works well. I have moved these here to preserve the information. Comments? FWIW Bzuk (talk) 15:31, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honorifics 

message: The Avro Arrow paragraph would be strengthened with an examination of the causes leading to its cancellation.  It should be noted that, had they been re-elected, the Liberal Party would have canceled the program.  While criticisms were made by the Liberal opposition regarding the way in which the cancellation, they did not criticize the decision to do so.  The program was eating up an increasing proportion of the defence budget.  The cost of the planes had increased five-fold from that originally budgeted to the manufacturing costs when the program was terminated.  There were no international buyers.  Interestingly, the Avro Arrow had never been flight tested with both the Iroquois engine and its weapons system. PieterGordon (talk) 20:00, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Be aware that the decision was Diefenbaker's alone, that the issues were complex and no consensus is possible about the actual details behind the decision. If you are referring to former Liberal Cabinet member C.D. Howe's post-election statement, remember that he was no longer in government. Pearson made no commitments one way or the other about the continuation of the Avro Arrow or its related programs. The Hansard accounts specifically rebute your statement about the lack of Opposition criticism, especially in the aftermath of the cancellation. The "cost factor" was never brought up in the months leading to the February 20, 1959 cancellation, rather that appeared in the days after the decision and are only obliquely cited in the PM's speech that day. Interestingly, RL-206 was nearly ready for test flight but the government reneged on an announcement that the Arrow/Iroquois program would be reviewed at the end of March 1959. The company continued to work on readying the first Arrow MK 2 before the entire program was unceremoniously "scrapped." The government's contention that the Arrow was unnecessary in the wake of missile attacks had led to the purchase of Bomarc anti-aircraft missiles. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 20:27, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: While the decision was indeed Diefenbaker's it is clear that the St. Laurent Government had, in light of the vast increase in expenditures on the project, began to scale back the program, including lowering the potential number of squadrons to be outfitted, as well as the initial order of planes to be built.  The Chiefs of Staff Committee of the armed forces had begun to question whether, in light of the limited number of aircraft to be completed, the costs would yield appropriate defence returns.  In 1958, ultimately, they, along with the PC Defence Minister Pearkes, recommended the cancellation of the program.  In a letter to Pearson a month before the cancellation, CD Howe reiterated his post-election statement, declaring that the Arrow should be terminated, and the PC Government attacked on its handling of the decision.  It is also important to note that, at the cancellation of the program, the Arrow story was regional; it was only later that it became a national concern, at which point the legend and mythology began.  While there is room for criticism in how the Diefenbaker  Government and its predecessor handled the project, and the PC line that military considerations were ultimately behind the cancellation, the decision to cancel was quite logical given the economic considerations. PieterGordon (talk) 20:01, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The issue of cancellation is a complex one but it was ultimately made by Diefenbaker with advice from but not necessarily consensus from defence and industry sources about the decision. Dief's decision was a significant one in that it negatively impacted the aerospace industry in our country for decades. The underlying issues stem back to longstanding Progressive Conservative antipathy for the previous Liberal government's "pet projects" which included the Seaway, oil pipelines and the Avro Arrow. What was not considered was that Pearkes was persuaded that the role of manned interceptors had been diminished. Contrast his support for the Arrow/Iroquois projects both prior to and post-1958. His visit to the Pentagon did much to shake his resolve in continuing with the Avro CF-105 Arrow. C.D. Howe was not elected in the 1957 election, and his comments were in start contrast to those of Paul Hellyer, the defence critic whose post-cancellation remarks can be found in Hansard records. The actual costs for the cancellation were neither "logical" nor "economically feasible." First the government was forced to pay out cancellation fees, the Avro Aircraft and Avro Orenda companies lost 15,000 employees while a further 40,000 jobs were affected in the "supply chain" of support companies all over Canada. The role of military aircraft design and production was severely affected as A.V. Roe Canada represented the largest industrial complex in the country at the time. The immediate ramifications of the cancellation was the loss of Canada's industrial and technological resources as many of the staff were lost for good; a group of Avro engineers went to NASA, many more of the 2,000 technicians and engineering staff left the country for jobs in the U.S. and the United Kingdom. After 1959, the RCAF never procured a Canadian-made design while indigenous aerospace technology was set back for over two decades until the Bombardier concern emerged from the remnants of the Canadair company. By 1961, the entire A.V. Roe company which had been the third largest industrial complex had collapsed. Politically, the Arrow cancellation can be seen as not only partisan but an ill-considered expedient that marked the decline and eventual end of Diefenbaker as a political force. The immediate economic repercussions of the cancellation led to the Progressive Conservative party's loss in countless elections in the "Golden Triangle" (a phenomenon that continues to this day). From that point on, through the "Night of the Long Knives," every decision, especially in the arena of national defence was challenged and with a series of mistakes regarding nuclear issues, led to Dief's defeat at the polls. Most poignantly, in 1961, the RCAF obtained F-101 Voodoo fighters (the very design that was rejected 10 years earlier) to undertake the same role that the Avro Arrow would have fulfilled; the Voodoo remained in service for approximately 30 years. Diefenbaker delayed the decision to acquire the Voodoo since his earlier acceptance of Bomarc missile defence had proved not only to be highly controversial (the missile only carried nuclear warheads but also proved to be an expensive failure) while equipping the RCAF with the Voodoo would have tantamountly led the public to perceive that the original decision to cancel the Arrow was in error. In his last years, Diefenbaker referred to the Arrow cancellation as a form of "watermark" of his years in office; he never came out with an formal statement of regret but in his memoirs and in speaking to colleagues and close confidants, he tacitly admitted that the whole affair was a disaster that had begun to undermine cabinet and public confidence in him. The final disgraceful act in the Arrow cancellation was the secret destruction of the aircraft, as well as all records of the project. Acting upon orders in council, Crown Assets undertook a scrapping of the aircraft that removed any possibility of the company being able to "save" the project or even salvage some aspect of the programs. Orders that were issued to the Dassault company for Iroquois engines were cancelled by the government while efforts to provide flyable examples for supersonic research at Farnborough were also summarily dismissed. The only viable Avro contracts remaining were for experimental VTOL aircraft designs that had been financed by the U.S. military. In a twist of fate, the Pentagon also proposed that the XF-108 Rapier be purchased by the RCAF to replace the cancelled Avro Arrow, in direct contradiction to the concept that manned interceptors were no longer needed. After 1959, Canada only purchased U.S. military equipment with the CF-5, CF-101, CF-104 and CF-118 (Hornet now reaching its 30th year in service with the Forces). FWiW Bzuk (talk) 17:57, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avro Arrow Paragraph Expansion 

message: Weeks before his death, Diefenbaker was indignant that very near his home, in the Rockcliffe neighbourhood, the Iraqi ambassador had a middle-east style wall built around the property. Diefenbaker strutted around nearby one day during news coverage of the controversy. Diefenbaker said that when Parliament met in the fall of 1979, he would demand in the House that the wall be demolished. Whether anyone took up the cause after his death is not known to me. GBC (talk) 00:58, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iraqi ambassador's residence 

message: I was reading this article about the St Lawrence Seaway turning 50 this year, and saw the following -- "The seaway held its official opening ceremony on June 26, 1959. Queen Elizabeth, Prince Philip, U.S. president Dwight D. Eisenhower and prime minister John Diefenbaker sailed through the seaway and St. Lambert Lock on the royal yacht Britannia........."  Very interesting report, so in an effort to learn more I followed my nose to our St Lawrence Seaway article and discovered it says "Queen Elizabeth II and President Dwight D. Eisenhower formally opened the Seaway........". No mention of Diefenbacker, which I thought was curious, to say the least. Comments? Kaiwhakahaere (talk) 21:59, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In the event of a head-of-state being present, the official party representing Canada would be Queen Elizabeth II. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:04, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Aw shucks, shoudda guessed. Kaiwhakahaere (talk) 00:05, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just an oversight? 

message: Hi, it is my intention to thoroughly work over the article with a view towards getting it to FAC in early 2010.  Collaborators welcome.--Wehwalt (talk) 16:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article improvement 

message: Most prime ministers have it as mf=yes for the birth/death date parameters. Perhaps we should change it to that? Connormah (talk) 16:56, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I had changed that ... while WP:MOSDATE says you can go either month first or day first, I find that day first is far more common in Canada.  I would suggest leaving it.  None of the Canadian prime ministers have made FA.  Yet.--Wehwalt (talk) 17:51, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Really? Month first (M/D/Y) is far more common here, I live in Canada...and all of the other prime ministers use a MDY format, should we conform to those? Connormah (talk) 22:17, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You surprise me.  Whenever I see a document from Canada, it seems to have a day month year.  However, I guess popular usage is otherwise.  What are your views on British versus American spelling, though?--Wehwalt (talk) 22:35, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe just government documents, but MF is used more casually, in books, etc. I don't really take note to spellings much. Connormah (talk) 23:50, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe it is just the government, plus Quebec of course.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:59, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you think about the infobox dates in the article? DF or MF? I'll get you to decide. Connormah (talk) 01:08, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we should be consistent.  One Canada, after all.  Month first!  I just wrote the final years section and I am really starting to like this guy.  He just never gave in, never forgave or forgot.--Wehwalt (talk) 01:50, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth/Death Dates 

message: A references section would be useful, with Diefenbaker books, movies, and records listed.70.29.78.233 (talk) 19:13, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: He did do the one record, of speeches as I recall.  But his books are listed in the biblio section (oh, he probably did a ghostwritten book or two while party leader, but that hardly counts.  I'm not sure there's enough there to be worth it.--Wehwalt (talk) 19:20, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there are records of his speeches, but also many songs that refer to him.  Two are "Dief Will Be the Chief Again" by Stringband and "Die, Dief, Die" by the Vulcan Dub Squad.  There is also a group called "Diefenbaker".70.29.78.233 (talk) 20:07, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I'm familiar with the first one.  But I really don't think they are relevant to a biographical article on Dief, especially one that is going to be fairly long.  It could be lumped into a separate article, Popular depictions of John Diefenbaker, along with the dog, the character in Bimbos of the Death Sun nicknamed after Dief, and so forth.--Wehwalt (talk) 20:18, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Perhaps it might be wise to add a pronunciation in the lead? Connormah (talk) 23:27, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly, but how do you do it in a way that is helpful to the reader?  I don't really believe IPA, however accurate it is, is helpful.  I did mention it in a footnote how it is pronounced, or at least the last two syllables, which is what gives people pause who are not either of Dief's era or Canadian.--Wehwalt (talk) 00:20, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That should be good. Connormah (talk) 00:24, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation? 

message: The lead refers to Dief as an "attorney".  Why is this term, not used by lawyers in Canada, used here?  Unless there is some reason, it should be changed to "lawyer" which I will do unless there is objection.  The article cites Peter C Newman as saying Dief did 62 jury trials in one year.  Surely not.  I doubt that there were that many jury trials in the whole province in a year.  Does someone have access to Newman's book to see whether this claim is actually supported by Newman's book? --KenWalker | Talk 05:49, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I own the book.  I am presently traveling and will doublecheck when I get home.  It did seem high, but God only knows what went on in Saskatchewan in 1920.  I will change "attorney" to "lawyer" whereever it occurs, it is my American ignorance thinking they are synonymous.  Many thanks.--Wehwalt (talk) 09:11, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

text: The quote from Newman is "During his first year, he handled sixty-two jury trials, winning about half of them."--Wehwalt (talk) 04:57, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I would generally consider Newman a reliable source but I would bet a buck didn't do 62 jury trials in a year, perhaps in his career, but in a year, no way.  --KenWalker | Talk 03:11, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Wilson and Wilson, Diefenbaker for the Defence gives no figure, but does mention him representing five of fourteen farmers charged with fraud, he got acquittals before a jury in all five, but his were the the least involved defendants.  That kind of thing could run up the score.--Wehwalt (talk) 03:29, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A couple of things 

message: I see that NormanEinstein has added a link to the Diefenbunker. Other info that may be of relevance:
*1926 by-election for Prince Albert electoral district (on 1926-02-15), mentioned in the article, in which WLMK's only opponent was a local farmer and ex-WWI flying ace (David Luther Burgess) who ran as an independent; the date is useful, the fact he had one opponent may be relevant, the actual name may not be
*in Mandate (1958–1962), there is the claim about the Avro Arrow that it "had suffered from many cost overruns and complications", but there's no ref for it; also, the transition from Avro to civil liberties seems abrupt
*in Return to opposition, the statement He dismissed the adopted design, with a single red maple leaf and two red bars, as "a flag that Peruvians might salute". has no supporting reference
Other than that, this article seems complete and comprehensive. I've done a complete review, and conditional on the above (with your discretion for the first point listed) I'll add my support to the FAC. Mindmatrix 03:35, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the date.  I think it trivial to add the name of the independent candidate; the point is to establish Mackenzie King as the Liberal MP for Prince Albert and set up the race.  The article is about Diefenbaker, and he did not run (at the time, it was the custom not to run an opposing major party candidate when the leader ran in a by election, either because he had lost his seat or because he had to be confirmed as minister (Canada kept that until 1939).  I moved the Avro into the Eisenhower Years section; the Bomarc and Arrow are all tangled up, so it makes sense to have it there.  I added cites as required, hoping you will support once you look at it.  Thanks for the review.  If you do support at FAC, please mention that you reviewed the article on the article talk page, you'll give it more weight.--Wehwalt (talk) 19:14, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional points 

message: Good point on removing my external link to the article on Dief in the Dictionary -- sorry I didn't look closer before I did it. What do you think of including it in the bibliography? I suggest this because I think it's a very valuable source, being written by his primary biographer AND being super-easily accessibly by virtue of the fact that it's online. As well, because it's buried in the footnotes it might slip by many readers. -- The Fwanksta (talk) 04:53, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That is fine, just make sure it is alphabetical under Smith and uses the same citation format as the other references.  Many thanks,--Wehwalt (talk) 11:51, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Hope the formatting is to your specifications. -- The Fwanksta (talk) 16:19, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent, thanks.  I'm picky about MOS issues because I don't want to see articles I've worked hard on deteriorate.--Wehwalt (talk) 16:32, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll let you know if I do another Canadian article.  I also got Canadian federal election, 1957 to FA.  Many thanks.--Wehwalt (talk) 18:30, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online 

message: "By the end of 1963, the first of the Bomarc warheads entered Canada, where they remained until the last were finally phased out during John Turner's brief government in 1984."
This sentence contradicts CIM-10 Bomarc (sections "Canada and the Bomarc" and "Operation") which states that the warheads were phased out twelve years earlier. --Voyager (talk) 09:56, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Source said June 30, 1984.  Do you have an actual source (not a WP article) which says otherwise?  Many thinks,--Wehwalt (talk) 11:38, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Both the Canadian Air Force  and the Air Defense Radar Veteran's Association  say it was in 1972. --Voyager (talk) 12:49, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

text: By the way, I'm currently translating this article into German. --Voyager (talk) 12:50, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well done.  I will dig up my copy of Nash and look at the exact phrasing.--Wehwalt (talk) 13:24, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy section 

message: Didn't accept a change here  because 
 lists his father's name as William, not danny. Hobit (talk) 16:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the revert.  Diefenbaker's father was named William, I can confirm that from many RS.--Wehwalt (talk) 12:00, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert justification 

message: The Government of Canada is a primary source for the history of Prime Ministers. It is the source used for the List of Prime Ministers of Canada. Why would we say the Government of Canada is wrong? 117Avenue (talk) 22:50, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You tempt me ... it's easy enough to check contemporary newspapers and so forth, I guess.  But why does there seem to be a widespread error? regardless of whichever one of us is right.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:00, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

text: Canadian Prime Ministers don't resign at mid-night, before their successors are sworn in. For example, Martin resigned on February 6, 2006 - about 2hrs before Harper was sworn in. The primary source you mentioned, erroneously leaves out the last 'date' in office of outgoing prime ministers. GoodDay (talk) 23:47, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought so too, but the website says otherwise. 117Avenue (talk) 07:45, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That website is un-reliable in this case, as it chooses to end with the last 'full day' in office. GoodDay (talk) 14:13, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

text: The 19th centuary prime ministerships hav had inbetween 'across dates' vacancies, though. GoodDay (talk) 23:48, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, because of the deaths of Macdonald and Thompson, it taking a bit of time for the Conseratives to caucus.  But I agree.  I think we are seeing some sort of function on the Parliament web site which is unable to believe that two people can both be PM on the same day (because one resigns and the other takes over).  But the website doesn't understand that.--Wehwalt (talk) 00:18, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, the website can't handle the same date thing. I reverted 117 Avenue's changes on the PM bio articles & the List article. GoodDay (talk) 00:25, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Term dates 

message: Someone added information alleging Dief may have had an illegitimate child in the late 60s, and there will be DNA testing with the cooperation of the Diefenbaker Centre.  I suggest we ignore it unless and until it's shown this guy is Dief's kid.  If so, add something tasteful and sourced.  But unless and until that happens, do nothing.--Wehwalt (talk) 00:01, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, the testing will take place in December & the result won't be available until the new year. GoodDay (talk) 21:58, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no problem with adding it, assuming it pans out.  I doubt it will though.  People said a lot of nasty things about Dief in his time, and since, but this guy is the first to say Dief played around on Olive.  I think he was so loyal to Olive that this is the reason Edna is mentioned only three times in his memoirs (marriage, his first nomination in Lake Centre, and the Atherton case, during which Edna died.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:57, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe he looks like Dief because Elmer fooled around.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:57, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: We shall learn the truth, in the new year. GoodDay (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently not, per this.  I'm starting to think this guy is not all 100% all there, but as of right now, there is no evidence he was Dief's kid, and I suggest we ignore it until and unless there's something more.  At least he isn't proposing digging up Dief, not that this is very practical in a Saskatchewan winter.--Wehwalt (talk) 12:49, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

text: I see your point, but given the lack of actual evidence, I'm reluctant, as that may offend people who are consulting the article when we don't have a good enough reason to do so, as besmirching the man when this guy Dryden may be a couple of eggs short of a dozen.  It's still the status quo as it was before, and he still hasn't gotten his mom to back him.  I suggest we continue to monitor the situation.--Wehwalt (talk) 12:23, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible illegitimate child 

message: A further DNA development in the news yesterday as reported here by CBC. If I have it straight, Dryden's DNA has now been shown to match that of three brothers named Goertzen in Saskatchewan, whose father (now deceased) was born in 1939 to Diefenbaker's housekeeper. Since Dryden and the Goertzens' father were born about 30 years and 2 provinces apart, it seems doubtful there would be anyone else in common in the backgrounds of both mothers. Dirac66 (talk) 17:31, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's still speculative in my view.  Two things:  the high percentage was that they were related, not that they were brothers.  Second, they need to close the link to Diefenbaker, and the attempt to get DNA from artifacts in the Dief Centre in Saskatoon were not successful.--Wehwalt (talk) 18:00, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

text: I continue to believe that we should wait until the secondary sources accept the claim as true.  I understand your argument about the feelings, but that has to be balanced against the feelings of those who believe in Diefenbaker, part of whose appeal was his loyalty to his wives.  I think Wikipedia is ill-equipped to make such judgments, and therefore we await the verdict of history.--Wehwalt (talk) 13:14, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Two history teachers have now included the claims of Mr. Dryden and Mr. Goertzen in their books.  They are John Boyko, Cold Fire: Kennedy’s Northern Frontier, (New York and Toronto, 2016), pp. 19-20 accessed at Amazon.com 30 May 2018, and J.D.M. Stewart, Being Prime Minister, (Toronto, 2018), p. ?, accessed at Google books 30 May 2018. Each gives a paragraph or two on Dryden's and Goertzen's assertions and evidence and then Boyko says this "certainly raises interesting questions about a secret life that ... stands in contrast to Diefenbaker's stodgy image", and Stewart says "the story is remarkable and cause for reflection on the Chief."  These two secondary sources would seem to be sufficient to merit a paragraph on the alleged offspring of John Diefenbaker.RWIR (talk) 02:46, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

text: I'm not sure they say anything definite enough for inclusion but let's see what people think.--Wehwalt (talk) 02:59, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Or perhaps two 

message: As a young man John served his community as a member of the 
Eclectic Club (4 clubs existed in Saskatchewan), which in 1926 merged with the Kinsmen Organization (Kinsmen and Kinette Clubs of Canada) of which he took an active role.    
reference... http://reddeerkinsmen.com/about/11-history
70.73.120.184 (talk) 02:07, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't question that.  After all, it's in the song.  Nevertheless, it seems a relatively small point and I'm not certain it merits inclusion.--Wehwalt (talk) 06:24, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 18 March 2012 

message: At his on-air retirement from CBC News, Knowlton Nash recounted an anecdote from when he was a foreign correspondent and had been sent to Cuba on assignment.  The hotel where he was staying had a large portrait of Castro, another of Lenin -- and a third, of Diefenbaker.  When Nash asked about this, he was told that they had heard Dief was honored for his anti-American stance (presumably on the missile question, given the implied time of this incident, although Nash did not say in the interview).  121a0012 (talk) 18:56, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I like it!  Wonder if it's still there.--Wehwalt (talk) 20:06, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nash anecdote 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Diefenbaker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111120080420/http://www.globalnews.ca/retrospective/6442481930/story.html to http://www.globalnews.ca/retrospective/6442481930/story.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:33, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The articles about most of the Canadian prime ministers who have followed Diefenbaker have sections about the honorary degrees they have received. See Lester B. Pearson#Honorary degrees, Pierre Trudeau#Honorary degrees, Joe Clark#Honorary degrees, John Turner#Honorary degrees, Brian Mulroney#Honorary degrees, Kim Campbell#Honorary degrees, Jean Chrétien#Honorary degrees, Paul Martin#Honorary degrees, and Stephen Harper#Honorary degrees. In light of this pattern, it would seem to be appropriate for Diefenbaker as well. However, an editor removed a section for that on the grounds that it was not encyclopedic. Does anyone else have an opinion about that? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:07, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: So how is that not WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS? Adding stuff does not create precedent for more adding stuff. This is a FA and has been through multiple reviews, and no one felt the need for honorary degrees. The others are not Featured Articles. Note that the other featured article on a Canadian prime minister, John A. Macdonald, does not include honorary degrees.--Wehwalt (talk) 08:35, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honorary degrees 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on John Diefenbaker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141201190014/http://www2.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=942b8255-2822-4d40-822c-70d8b0212305 to http://www2.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=942b8255-2822-4d40-822c-70d8b0212305
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150926180407/http://www.pc.gc.ca/clmhc-hsmbc/sep-gra/pms/diefenbaker.aspx to http://www.pc.gc.ca/clmhc-hsmbc/sep-gra/pms/diefenbaker.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:07, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Diefenbaker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100113101117/http://www2.parl.gc.ca/Parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=84909dc1-9a60-44b3-a939-2393ab563089&Language=E to http://www2.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=84909dc1-9a60-44b3-a939-2393ab563089&Language=E
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:56, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I suppose that the roots of his grandparents' ancestors (probably called "Diefenbacher") lie in the village of Diefenbach which is situated just a few kilometres south of Adersbach and Sinsheim. --Kolya (talk) 11:43, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably but I'm not sure it's covered in the biographies.--Wehwalt (talk) 11:56, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family 

message: Someone who knows how really ought to add his electoral record. He ran for many offices, and as a former PM, such information would be critical to making this a complete entry.
BlewsClews (talk) 01:50, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: There is such an article ( I put it together a couple of years ago).  It's a separate article because of the length of this bio.  It doesn't appear to be linked on this bio page;  I must have forgotten to add a link back then. I've rectified the omission by adding an "About" tag at the top of this article.  Thanks for pointing this out! Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 04:37, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

text: Good job but I don't think it needs to be at the top of the article. I've moved it to "See also".--Wehwalt (talk) 08:23, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electoral history

message: *A - Will suffice. GoodDay (talk) 18:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: My problem with "C", is that it may hide the fact that the original Conservatives were the gov't from 1930 to 1935. GoodDay (talk) 19:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an interesting point but it's usual for governments to continue for some time past the election. The focus is on Diefenbaker's feat in winning elections during that time of Liberal dominance, something the half dozen or so other Tory leaders could not do (including Bennett after 1930 and before time ran out on him in 1935, when if he could have called an election and won, he would have).--Wehwalt (talk) 20:38, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: C is not the current version. Instant Comma (talk) 20:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: True. Ak-eater06 changed it repeatedly, and I wasn't willing to edit war with them over it.--Wehwalt (talk) 21:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

text: I changed from D to A. The important thing is to be clear about the date range. Instant Comma (talk) 19:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey (First lead paragraph)

message: Folks, I reopened this RFC, on the advice of User:GoodDay. I was new to this RFC stuff and wrongly instantly closed it as I assumed that the "C" side won. However, I did this prematurely as I didn't follow the rules of the RFC. Five responses was not enough and I'll leave this open for one or two more weeks. My apologies for the confusion I created. 
The RFC for this is reopened. I encourage any user who hasn't inserted their opinion to please participate in the survey. Happy holidays. Ak-eater06 (talk)  19:42, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Though it's unusual to have two RFC happening at the same time, at the same article. This situation is alright, as both are of different topics. GoodDay (talk) 20:38, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yet they cover overlapping text and could come to different results.--Wehwalt (talk) 20:47, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: If they do? We can try to reach a compromise out of the two results or (after these two RFCs are closed) begin a third RFC. GoodDay (talk) 20:53, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: User:GoodDay, interesting idea. We can scrap these two RFCs and begin a third one with options A, B, C, D, or E for the first paragraph of the lead. Pinging User:Wehwalt too. Ak-eater06 (talk)  21:07, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think GoodDay means after these two run their course, start a third. Scrapping RFCs that have generated comments for the purpose of starting a new one might not be a proper use of the process. Perhaps , who has more experience in these things than I do, could advise.--Wehwalt (talk) 21:20, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Assuming you & Ak-eater06 are the main opponents concerning how & what should be in this bios's intro. I'll agree to scrapping the two current RFC, in favour of a new RFC with options that you both can agree to present. Would be best (if you both agree to close the two RFCs & open a new RFC) to contact every editor who's already given their input in the two RFCs-in-question. GoodDay (talk) 21:29, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think I would agree to that. It can easily be covered inside the first RFC. In fact, with option E, it probably has.--Wehwalt (talk) 21:38, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Well then, we'll let the two RFC continue onward. GoodDay (talk) 21:42, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

text: Option E has a major flaw. It creates the impression that Diefenbaker was the only non-Liberal prime minister, between 1930 & 1979. GoodDay (talk) 21:58, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: What about language like "between the Bennett government (1930-35) and that of Joe Clark (1979-1980) to win an election, doing so three times ..." Something along those lines anyway.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:02, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Something like that. We also need to keep in mind, prime ministers aren't elected, bur rather they're appointed. GoodDay (talk) 22:04, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I'm proposing that we keep the existing lead, with the dates in the first sentence changed to years, but change the second sentence to "He was the only Progressive Conservative party leader between the Bennett government (1930-1935) and that of Joe Clark (1979-1980) to lead the party to an election victory, doing so three times, although only once with a majority of the seats in the House of Commons.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:13, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm find with that, even though it extends the lead. GoodDay (talk) 22:46, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

text: Your  has taken the RfC statement outside the requirements of WP:RFCBRIEF, and consequently . You need to shorten it significantly. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:52, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Redrose64 where in your link does it say that five options is too many? Ak-eater06 (talk)  01:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't, because the number of options is immaterial (I have seen valid, if confusing, RfCs with eight or more options). It is the length of the RfC statement as a whole that is the problem: this is the amount of wikitext (measured in bytes) from the  tag (exclusive) to the next valid timestamp (inclusive). Your edit that I linked above added 616 bytes to the RfC statement, and the  added a further 84: these two taken together tipped it over the edge.  shortened the statement from 2,511 bytes to 203, and so it is now well within the capabilities of Legobot, as evidenced by . --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 09:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: With so much drama in the R-F-C it's kind of hard bein' an editor on Wiki

message: *Version A since consensus already settled on it, and it is more informative.  If anything, the other Canadian PM articles should be tweaked to give more specific dates.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  21:47, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey (First sentence of the first lead paragraph)

message: I found out about this rule Wikipedia:Don't revert due solely to "no consensus" and would like some people's thoughts on it, as a request for consensus has been drawn out multiple times on this article over the past few months.
I am not trying to create any argument or conflict and I don't even agree with this rule. However, maybe we should discuss/clarify this for future edits to the lead. Ak-eater06 (talk)  02:48, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not a rule. It is one person’s opinion. Read the top part about how it is an essay.—Wehwalt (talk) 08:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia:Don't revert due solely to "no consensus" 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* John Diefenbaker in 1964.wav
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:08, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion