Talk:Chicken Shack

message: :Image:100tonchicken.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:100tonchicken.png

message: Hm, the first sentence says the band was formed in the late '60s; the next paragraph says April 1965; and the infobox says 1967. At least one of these is faulty. --jpgordon::==( o ) 06:44, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: The member timeline has not been completed, and if it was it would take up a huge amount of space due to the amount of musicians that have passed through the ranks of the band. I therefore propose it's removal from the page. As a result of this, I also propose that the former members should be placed back in the infobox.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SAULGNRFAN (talk • contribs) 21:21, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the new member timeline which has been started on the page is a useful addition, and replaces the original member section well. However, until it is complete, I suggest that the previous member section remains untouched. SAULGNRFAN (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 20:12, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Member Timeline 

message: Since the membership timeline was added to this page, the members section has been removed. I would think a simple members section would be useful on this page. Any objections? Burbridge92 (talk) 09:07, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Members section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Chicken Shack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080527223615/http://www.stanwebb.co.uk:80/ to http://www.stanwebb.co.uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified