Talk:Kristina Davis

message: Since someone wants the page of Kristina Davis to merge with Children of General Hospital. I have come to a conclusion that it should not be merged since Lexi Ainsworth now has a contract with General Hospital and Michael Corinthos III, Kristina's brother's page hasn't been merged so Kristina's shouldn't be merged either. Jester66 (talk) 22:24, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Contracts don't matter, this article fails WP:N and guidance at Wikipedia:SOAPS#Notability standards. The Michael article would also probably fail an AfD, but at least that character has been involved in major storylines. Those of you who thing every single soap character needs their own article are in for a rude awakening when someone comes along to enforce policy, and dozens of articles are summarily deleted.— TAnthonyTalk 09:19, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

text: I have to agree. I read the policies, bro, and I think that this character's article needs to be put back with the rest of the children. Kristina has only been onscreen for a month and has not even been seen every day, unlike Michael. Not only that, Michael has had storylines that influenced the show since the character's birth (even before that,lol)! Kristina is more of a "back" or a "supporting" character that hasn't even got one major storyline since her return. --Leslie Roak (talk) 15:06, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Eventually, Kristina will need her own page because they are obviously gearing up to have her be much more.  Though in the month of June Kristina was on 14 times out of 22.  But since "currently" she isn't someone can deleate the page but within months she will probably warrant her own page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.227.217.84 (talk) 17:30, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Children of General Hosptial 

message: I found another image on the site with Lexi as Kristina and i saved it and re-uploaded it on the current image [as a new version of the image]. --Leslie Roak (talk) 15:10, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: I have removed an image of the younger actress portraying this role in accordance with non-free content policy: "Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information." Barring some explanation of why the image of the younger actress is necessary, I believe that non-free content allowances cannot support more than one image here. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:41, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple images

message: There's been no proof of her changing her last people. People assume that when a woman gets marry, she takes her husband's name. But that doesn't always mean that's the case. Wait until it's confirmed on-screen that she's going by Kristina Mitchell, or something along those lines. Musicfreak7676 my talk page! 23:56, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Her commonname is Kristina Davis, but she continues to switch between Davis/Corinthos-Davis/Corinthos depending on where she is and whom she is talking to. There's just no proof she legally changed her name within the series. People just assume that when you marry, you take their husband's last name, which isn't always true. Musicfreak7676 my talk page! 18:41, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

text: No it doesn't Alluka. That's a dumb rule people seem to follow in olden times that when a woman marries a man, she takes his last name. That has not been proven the case. She very well could still be Corinthos-Davis, etc. So until it's confirmed on-air, or it's decided upon in this discussion, do not change her last name. And as for Nikki Newman, that's because she LEGALLY changed her name on-screen and was referred to as such names. There's been no proof that Kristina is Mitchell. Musicfreak7676 my talk page! 16:43, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Of course people don't always take their spouse's name - in real life. But that doesn't apply here, in here we list the names in the way stated before. Caringtype, it seems kind of silly to first not put it in when they are actually married and then put it in when they are divorced? No. Musicfreak, Nikki has NOT changed her name legally to all those names. Newman, yes. Abbott, yes. But Sharpe? Most definitely not. Nor has she been referred to as "Mrs. Sharpe" on the show. She never took the name nor did she use it. It's still here because it shows that she has been married to a Sharpe. And THAT is the point here. Allukka (talk) 19:48, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Why doesn't it apply here? That makes no sense. Of course it'd apply here. Kristina hasn't been seen since she got married, so we have no idea whether she's [legally] within the series Kristina Mitchell. That's not the point, the last names are there because it's the names the women have shared. Not what their "married men's last name" is. That's a stupid reason. If that were the case, then any visitor could and would visit the information box to see her marriages. Musicfreak7676 my talk page! 20:05, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: But the women HAVEN'T "shared" the names, and yet they are listed. You're not making any sense. Allukka (talk) 18:53, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her last name 

message: I noticed that there was a section for the character's sexuality on here since she returned in September 2015, then I spot that the section is gone. Do you think there are good links to discuss it? Also should Kristina be put under Fictional LGBT characters or Fictional bisexual women? Jester66 (talk) 22:36, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kristina's Sexuality