Talk:Princess Comet

message: Most of the article is too less focused on the series — it's more focused on the creator of Comet-san and the controversy between it copying Ojamajo Doremi (which doesn't even have sources, I might add). I suggest that the information about the creator be linked on his own profile page instead of being listed here, since a lot of it has to do with himself and not Comet-san. --User:Justicebullet 10:33, 5 September 2006 (GMT -8:00)
:The information about the creator should go in its own article. The dispute over copying should be given a brief mention, but the POV-oriented original research comparing the two has not place in the article. --TheFarix (Talk) 13:08, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fist of all, you threats on my talk page that either I must make an accounting of my edits on this article or be reverted them is a sign of ownership on your part and will not be tolerated. Second, using a fan website as a source is generally not excepted as a reliable source, and using information from such a site is often considered original research by other editors. Third, much of what was removed had little to no relevance to the subject of the article to begin with. And lastly, the point by point comparison between Comet-san and Doremi is completely unnecessary, especially when it comprises the bulk of the article. If there is a controversy, mention it by briefly explaining both sides of the argument, give a couple of references from reliable sources, then move on. But giving it more then a couple of paragraphs gives it undo weight. --TheFarix (Talk) 03:03, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Focusing too less?

message: So far can this page b upgraded? How and when? --Hkcbgcs 23:55, 26 August 2006 (GMT +8:00)
:There was too much original research in the article for it to be classified as B-class. When it's removed, it's a Start-class article at best. --TheFarix (Talk) 13:03, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Upgrade

message: Animax didn't give the series the title "Princess Comet". It's possible that it's the title on international prints of the series. 82.41.66.173 11:51, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Animax did indeed give the series the title Princess Comet during its English language broadcasts; see: official website for more information. Wikipedia prioritizes established references over original research. Ganryuu  (talk) 05:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The correct title should be Cosmic Baton Girl Comet-san --Hkcbgcs 10:58, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: This article is confusing. It fails to mention that Yokoyama produced a manga and anime version of this story already in the late 60's. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 01:50, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Kometto-San

message: There really NEEDS to be more information on the original manga, since it is the source. At least the dates it ran, and how many volumes. CFLeon (talk) 23:34, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Manga Infomation

message: If it was PRINCESS Comet it would be Comet-hime, but it says Comet-SAN which means MISS Comet! Since when did the honorific "san" translate to princess? And where's the valid source calling it PRINCESS Comet, anyway?Rayayala17 (talk) 17:48, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Princess Comet?