lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gibson J-200

message: It appears that the beginning of this article is lacking a neutral point of view.  The statement "The Gibson Super Jumbo is the world's most famous acoustic guitar..." seems to be an assertment that violates Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.  It should be relatively easy to correct while still leaving in the fact that it is a very famous guitar, but there has been disagreement about why it should be changed at all.  Since saying that it is the world's most famous guitar is in essence an opinion (it is not a fact, like were it to be said "X number of Gibson Super Jumbo guitars were sold, making it the highest selling guitar in year Y"), it should be changed to reflect a more neutral point of view.  Possibilities would be saying "The Gibson Super Jumbo is one of the world's most famous acoustic guitars..." or "The Gibson Super Jumbo is a very famous acoustic guitar...".  All of these options reflect the fact that the guitar is very famous, but are presented neutrally, as all articles on Wikipedia should be.  -- Natalya 04:34, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutral point of view

message: OK, in trying to de POV a little bit of this article to show how it's done I did a little searching. This page on the Gibson site seems to be where much of the text of this article came from. I think some serious copyediting is needed here as that material is badged "© 1999 Gibson Musical Instruments" ... clearly a no-no for inclusion in Wikipedia, unless we have explicit permission to use it. We can cite it, and even quote short passages of it with proper credit, but not use it directly. The article needs a major reworking to remove all this copyvio text, unfortunately. This is not my area of interest so if no one steps up soon and rewrites it to remove all this copyvio, I am going to gut the article down to just the first sentence, removing any text that matches text on that site. Unfortunately. ++Lar: t/c 22:47, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyvio??? 

message: Since I own a J-200JR (smaller body obviously) I'd like to know if it should be mentioned in here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.154.253.150 (talk) 18:38, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. The J-200 Junior is the SJ-200's "Little Brother" and deserves it's own article. Hope this helps. Lion King 00:00, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Special versions ?

message: The picture in the infobox looks to big. I'd shrink it, but then it would be too small. Maybe an alternate version with the head pointing up? Eman235/talk 23:39, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox picture
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Various unseen or stub Star Trek Classes

message: I speedy deleted the article associated with this VFD.  It was completely improper to create a blank article and then nominate it for deletion followed by "bulk listing" several other articles.  Each article should have its own VFD page.  This page should be shut down and if the nominator wishes to delete the other articles, they should be listed one at a time through the proper VfD procedures. -Husnock 04:35, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy Deleted
Talk:Buschwhacker

message: I removed this from the text:
My original intent for the word was to describe drivers who used their Winston Cup teams & resources to beat up on the other teams in the Busch series.  I did not apply it to drivers such as Earnhardt, Michael Waltrip, Dale Jarrett, Jimmy Spencer, or other drivers in the Winston Cup Series that either drove in the Busch series for their own family owned teams that were separate from their Cup teams, or were driving for another team in the Busch series that was not related to their Cup series team.
68.39.174.238 04:38, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

message: The article asserts that Buschwhacking hinders the development of young drivers... but is that really the case?  It seems to me that the Sprint Cup series has a steady stream of rookie drivers coming in every year. Check out the list of recent NASCAR Rookie of the Year candidates (which doesn't include Carl Edwards who essentially gave up his chance to be an official rookie.) Timothy Horrigan (talk) 21:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Has Buschwhacking actually hurt the development of young drivers?
Talk:Wintersmith

message: Unless someone can cite the information in here, it should be deleted.12.17.189.77 04:44, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

message: I bought the book and finished it today, so I've added the plot - but im a wiki-virgin too, so feel free to improve. 21/09/06 11.51pm
As of August 2006 there are publisher's blurbs to link to. --David Sewell 13:38, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And the Dark Dance is from the publicity blurb. Daibhid C 20:11, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

text: It's fixed now.  The link code for in there is the same as the link code in the main text.  --Zoe.R 12:11, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Paperback is available, but I don't know which edition to mention. --141.3.48.218 (talk) 13:54, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paperback 

message: Might it be worth mentioning the Studio Album inspired/interpretation of the book by Steeleye Span (working with Terry Pratchett)?
62.7.71.94 (talk) 08:59, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steeleye Span interpretation
Talk:Brothers (Star Trek: The Next Generation)

message: "... suggesting a form of automatic recall."  This doesn't make sense to me, and Wikipedia doesn't even define "automatic recall."  Please restate or explain.  --AlanH 21:16, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  automatic recall 

message: Article has been tagged for needing sources long-term. Feel free to reinsert the below material with appropriate references. DonIago (talk) 13:28, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material 

message: “…Captain Picard (Patrick Stewart) orders Data to transfer the controls to Engineering…”. No, he doesn’t - Picard orders Geordi to transfer the helm to engineering, and Geordi acknowledges the command. Presumably he carries out the order, and then Data transfers command back to the bridge again, or over-rides things to make Geordi believe he had carried out the order successfully. Jock123 (talk) 10:31, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transfer to engineering…
Talk:Kate Earl

message: This article doesn't convey a scholarly tone in its biographical information; it comes across like promotional material.  I think it needs a substantial working-over to better fit Wikipedia's standards.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.80.66.17 (talk) 19:47, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone

message: Made a very minor edit in the "related acts" section so that the link goes to the Band named Dawes instead of going to the disambiguation page. Should've been marked as a minor edit, but I forgot to tick the box.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mostlymuppet (talk • contribs) 16:44, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor Edit
Talk:United States Railroad Administration

message: The Conclusion section has lots of POV and may even be original research. --KJRehberg (talk) 15:01, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See below -- text moved here. Caseyjonz (talk) 04:25, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-POV changes 

message: I have been researching for another article using the PRR chron materials from Chris Baer's site... In reading through the 1918 materials.. I was struck by the massive scale of disruption in the NY and New England area by the "coal famine" of 1918... the details in the chron are staggering... I am planning to come back and more to this article.. the impact of the USRA for its brief period was an incredible feat... the standardization and other areas are fascinating to read... many thanks to all...
Risk Engineer (talk) 15:11, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incredibly brief article for such as momentous period in our history ...
Talk:Almost Transparent Blue

message: As a possible alternative to User:KenWalker's proposal to delete the article about Almost Transparent Blue's English translator, I have suggested that the article about Nancy Andrew be merged into this one.  Information about her is not readily available outside Wikipedia, and I think it's a service to researchers to offer them this information.  Having said that, I think it's a fair question whether the information should be presented in a free-standing article about the translator or in the article about the novel.  Because the Nancy Andrew article has been assigned to the Arts and Entertainment Work Group of WikiProject Biography, I invite members of that group to offer their perspective.  -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 23:39, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger of [[Nancy Andrew]] into this article

message: The character of Lily is almost certainly not a real person. She seems to be a hallucination of Ryu's, and only appears to him when he is alone.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grendal32 (talk • contribs) 05:42, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Lily]
Talk:RiverCentre

message: In the movie Happy Gilmore, there is a scene where Sandler's character takes his love interest to this arena, the logos for the Minnesota moose can be seen on the walls as they skate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.161.33.18 (talk) 06:24, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie Location Happy Gilmore
Talk:Kicking Against the Pricks

message: The song Cave covered was written by Phil Rosenthal (musician) and first recorded by The Seldom Scene. Some sources credit John Bundrick, who wrote a different song with the same title.  Design 05:08, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Muddy Water

message: : "The Hammer Song" is not to be confused with the song of the same name from the 1990 Bad Seeds album The Good Son.
Nor, presumably, with The Weavers'  "The Hammer Song", better known by its later title "If I Had a Hammer". The Bad Seeds' homonymous number is by Nick Cave. --Thnidu (talk) 20:11, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Hammer Song(s) 

message: frank farian's name has been attached as a co-writer on the basis that he furnished boney m's new male vocalist with an additional verse, which was later dropped.
out of respect for tom springfield & the certainty that nick cave did not sing this extra verse, I am removing farian's co-credit from this article
duncanrmi (talk) 13:55, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  'the carnival is over'/tom springfield
Talk:Garinger High School

message: Does anyone have a source for the OFFICIAL name of this school?  Although it was the superintendent's name, I have never heard it referred to as "Elmer Garinger High School," nor have I seen that it print.  I have always seen and heard simply "Garinger High School." Spleezleton 05:45, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of the school

message: The "Problems" section was full of opinion. I removed "the vents only blow hot air" because it made the article inconsistent -- what vents are blowing hot air in the summer if there is no heating during the winter? More citations are certainly needed, especially on the budget problems. BostonHMann 21:17, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems at the school

message: There are any number of Garinger graduates in the Charlotte area that will confirm the school is named after Elmer H. Garinger, former superintendent of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg School System. I am a 1968 graduate.  The number of 10-12 grade students exceeded 2400 at Garinger in 1968.  My understanding is Elmer H. Garinger was the largest high school in North Carolina in 1968.  My graduating class of consisted of approximately 550 graduates (out of 603 candidates).
68.200.66.213 01:12, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official School Name 

message: I could find no evidence supporting this so I deleted it's mention. What was mentioned is that Garinger won't be getting money to renovate it's gym. That's the budget change that effects Garinger.source BobbyAFC 00:34, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closure
Talk:5ep

message: if this is a split ep, then where are the songs by travail? Jlricherson 06:30, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Secret Cities

message: A tag has been placed on :Secret Cities requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
 No reference
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time. 
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the , or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Dxbnetwork (talk) 08:37, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Secret Cities]]
Talk:John Galen Howard

message: "Master Plan]] for what was then the University of California (now the University of California, Berkeley campus)"
The University of California was never renamed the "University of California, Berkeley campus" as the sentence implied. In Howard's time, there was the main UC campus in Berkeley, the Southern Campus in LA, the Medical Department in SF, the University Farm in Davis, etc. University of California still exists.--Jiang 05:15, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Democracy is Freedom – The Daisy

message: Page needs a mention of the proposed merger with DS and other parties to form a new 'Democratic Party'. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.112.19.214 (talk) 11:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Work on it! --Checco (talk) 18:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: I see a few problems with the current title of this article:
*The most common name is The Daisy, not "Democracy is Freedom – The Daisy" (see WP:TITLE)
*Even in Italy, everyone calls it La Margherita, and "Democrazia è Liberta" is seldom used, except in the abbreviation DL.
*"Democracy is Freedom" is wrongly capitalized (see WP:MOSTM)
So if there are no objections I will move this article to The Daisy, which currently redirects here. Mushroom (Talk) 22:09, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly oppose the move as the current title was the official name of the party and I see no reason for changing the title, let alone maybe WP:MOSTM, not a big deal anyway. I would leave the title as it is. --Checco (talk) 22:07, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move

message: Why was this article moved to "Is" from "is"? I see no real reason... —Nightstallion 13:05, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is worth saying that the move was not discussed in talk page and was very controversial: è (in English is) was not capitalized in the original name of the party (that is why the acronym was DL). We discussed that before and there was no consensus on the move. I contacted the author of the move for explanations but he did not manage to explain much. I confirm here my strong opposition to the move. --Checco (talk) 13:15, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article move
Talk:Socialist Worker

message: I think that this needs to be split, these two publications are entirely different and both need their own page and "Socialist Worker" should direct to a disambiguation page linking the two publications.--Jersey Devil 05:19, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. The two papers are very similar in their origins and politics and there is not a huge amount of content on either. If one or other part of the page grows substantially then it might be worth splitting them but for now I would leave them as a single page.--NHSavage 08:53, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is now about 3/4 different papers. While they are no doubt similar in political outlook, they are still different newspapers and thus should have their own pages.--JK the unwise 16:19, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: The claim that Peter Hitchens and Richard Littlejohn used to work for the british Socialist Worker paper seems some what dubious and is not mentioned in either of their wikipedia articles. According to the Garry Bushell page it seems he did write for the paper in the early stages of his carrer.--JK the unwise 08:52, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: JK the unwise, while I have not found confirmation on the web of the SW conneection for Littlejohn (only going by memory), it is certainly true of Hitchens; he refers to it in his Who's Who entry as having occurred in 1972-73. However, in his failed application for the, perhaps apocryphal, MI5 file on his IS activities, Hitchens dates his time at the University of York as 1970-73, therefore the evidence is either somewhat contradictory or suggests his work for Socialist Worker was slight. Occasional references on the web imply this is not the case though. The subject could be raised on his talk page, as Hitchens monitors his Wikipedia entry, or perhaps quietly buried as he would doubtless wish.Philip Cross 09:55, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Restored the reference, and found reliable source. Philip Cross (talk) 15:06, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Career Starts 

message: Property is theft and all that good stuff, but is there a good reason the owners of these newspapers are listed as N/A?  It's useful information.  Socialistworker.co.uk for example appears to be owned by Sherborne Publications Limited. 79.78.81.196 (talk) 12:26, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership
Talk:Legacy of the Drow

message: the link for "The Legacy" is wrong
The plot ist for "The Legacy" only. OnisanT 09:52, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I have proposed a merge of the articles for the four books in this series back into this article. The individual books are barely notable, though the series together seems to carry a bit more weight. Each of the individual articles have remained stubs for quite a time. -- Mikeblas (talk) 13:31, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have performed this merge. -- Mikeblas (talk) 17:10, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Tyson Chandler

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 20:41, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Acalanes High School

message: There is a lot of nonnotable material here, and a lot of unreferenced material. how is a member of the european parliament an acalanes graduate? i will try to get around to this some time.66.117.135.177 (talk) 23:21, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability and references
Talk:Essen, Germany

message: Someone should add information about the university in the article. --Liface 05:37, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move to Essen and merge page histories. Kimchi.sg 07:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support as originator. Olessi 13:00, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Games obsession

message: I question the relevance of this article.  I think it should be deleted, personally.  There already exist articles on Game addiction and Computer addiction.  At the very least it is poorly written... -- Scientizzle 05:49, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not quite sure what your deal is, but making up sock puppets to poorly explain the relevance of an article doesn't help. -- Scientizzle 02:47, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Anderson Mesa Station

message: Is there a reason that this is a stub?  It seems like we can remove that stub tag. --Deville (Talk) 06:01, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello 2600:1700:EFB0:11E0:ACA4:731E:24ED:AD0D (talk) 22:15, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

message: I removed the section "About the telescope" since it was a copyvio of . ConDemTalk 01:27, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio
Category talk:Provincial federations of labour (Canada)

message: It says in the history of this Category:
: 2 April 2013‎ Cydebot (talk | contribs)‎ . . (138 bytes) (+138)‎ . . (Robot: Moved from Category:National trade unions centers by country. Authors: The Bushranger, Bellerophon5685)
I am just curious about why this happened? Was there a discussion somewhere? XOttawahitech (talk) 14:46, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was this category  moved?
Talk:The Duprees

message: I have removed the recent changes (once again). Content should be based on independent reliable sources and cover all aspects of a topic in due weight. Wikipedia is no venue to promote specific viewpoints or interests. Controversial self-published claims - regardless of their validity - should not be included, unless they can be verified by independent published sources. As a last point: editors with a "conflict of interest" need to disclose this connection (see WP:COI for more info). GermanJoe (talk) 16:58, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: As suggestion for a compromise to include all aspects, I have kept a short neutral section about the current group's history and setup - based on an independent source. GermanJoe (talk) 19:55, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Slow-moving edit war, non-neutral editing, COI