Talk:Chicago Police Department

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Chicago Police Department. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://cbs2chicago.com/topstories/burge.settlement.council.2.626215.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081023011031/http://www.suntimes.com:80/news/politics/365163,CST-NWS-ops01.article to http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/365163,CST-NWS-ops01.article
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090411122436/http://cbs2chicago.com:80/local/special.operations.officers.2.932579.html to http://cbs2chicago.com/local/special.operations.officers.2.932579.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Chicago Police Department. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071117140833/http://edition.cnn.com:80/2007/LAW/05/16/police.beating.ap/ to http://edition.cnn.com/2007/LAW/05/16/police.beating.ap/
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110708124713/http://cbs2chicago.com/local/police.corruption.case.2.1208809.html to http://cbs2chicago.com/local/police.corruption.case.2.1208809.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Why is there no Haymarket Affair section under controversies and brutality? Victor Grigas (talk) 03:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haymarket? 

message: Is this in there?
Skullcap Crew
Victor Grigas (talk) 20:30, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skullcap Crew 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Chicago Police Department. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150622053903/https://portal.chicagopolice.org/portal/page/portal/ClearPath/News/Statistical%20Reports/Annual%20Reports/10AR.pdf to https://portal.chicagopolice.org/portal/page/portal/ClearPath/News/Statistical%20Reports/Annual%20Reports/10AR.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402135618/https://portal.chicagopolice.org/portal/page/portal/ClearPath/About%20CPD/History to https://portal.chicagopolice.org/portal/page/portal/ClearPath/About%20CPD/History
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150622053903/https://portal.chicagopolice.org/portal/page/portal/ClearPath/News/Statistical%20Reports/Annual%20Reports/10AR.pdf to https://portal.chicagopolice.org/portal/page/portal/ClearPath/News/Statistical%20Reports/Annual%20Reports/10AR.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:17, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chicago Police Department. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160819203529/http://www.xpresspress.com/news/JacksonCase_061308.html to http://www.xpresspress.com/news/JacksonCase_061308.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150301210414/http://chicagoist.com/2015/02/27/stories_continue_to_emerge_from_chi.php to http://chicagoist.com/2015/02/27/stories_continue_to_emerge_from_chi.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:41, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:51, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: The content is sourced to peer-reviewed research. The longest section in the article delineates endless scandals and episodes of misconduct. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 22:45, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see the need for that. It is critics, not everyone, that fixates on negative history. Regarding your cuts in general, what do you think an article on a major municipal police department should cover? Aside from (apparently) every single individual case of misconduct over centuries of history and tens of thousands of different officers over the course of that history, that is. Law enforcement is more than misconduct. We shouldn't be focusing only on one aspect. Crossroads -talk- 04:22, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead should not attribute the CPD's history of misconduct as "critics say" 

message: I'm concerned about the massive number of changes which occurred on 15 April, 2021. I'm not questioning whether the changes were made in good faith, and I certainly agree removing citations to unreliable sources is a good thing. But all removal of references to the Chicago Police Board and the Civilian Office of Police Accountability is troubling, as these are two organizations which are inextricable from the Chicago Police Department. Even if the information is simply that they exist, that information absolutely should be included in this article. DTXBrian (talk) 02:59, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I restored this. Feel free to restore anything else that would be appropriate, or to add other reliably sourced material. Crossroads -talk- 04:16, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concerns about sweeping editing removing relevant information 

message: Should the lead say that A. "Critics say the CPD has a has a history of police brutality and misconduct" (with attribution to "critics") or B. should it just plainly say "The CPD has a history of police brutality and misconduct" (without attribution to "critics"). Snooganssnoogans (talk) 00:30, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Uhhh, the department is currently under a consent decree stemming from a DOJ report from 2017. Isn't that as much "present" as you can get? Snooganssnoogans (talk) 18:42, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You stated above that "This ultimately led to a consent decree requiring reforms of the department"; presumably there have been reforms in the last 4 years. Crossroads -talk- 03:48, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

text: I think you are looking for WP:RFCCLOSE. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC: Police misconduct 

message: * B. The attribution is unnecessary and violates NPOV by casting doubt on the large number of peer-reviewed studies which document a history of misconduct (which includes literally running a torture squad), as well as a 2017 DOJ report which concluded that the "CPD had a history of civil rights violations by officers, including a "pattern and practice" of excessive force and abuse." This ultimately led to a consent decree requiring reforms of the department. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 00:35, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Uhhh, the department is currently under a consent decree stemming from a DOJ report from 2017. Isn't that as much "present" as you can get? Snooganssnoogans (talk) 18:42, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You stated above that "This ultimately led to a consent decree requiring reforms of the department"; presumably there have been reforms in the last 4 years. Crossroads -talk- 03:48, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: As Crossroads proposal is getting support from multiple users, can it be added as an option, together with A and B? Not sure what is the process here. Adoring nanny (talk) 11:13, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are looking for WP:RFCCLOSE. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Ella French. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 24#Ella French until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 17:47, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ella French" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]