lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Sweet Children

message: According to the official Green Day web-site and some other sources, the band and the EP were both called Sweet Children rather than The Sweet Children. Does anyone have a copy of the EP that would give a definitive answer? --Theo  (Talk) 21:24, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band and EP name 

message: The band was called Sweet Children, no "The". Also the music you're referring to is from a 1990 Green Day EP titled Sweet Children. There was a Sweet Children demo recorded in 1989, however the only track you mentioned that's actually on it is Sweet Children, and 2,000 Light Years Away was not on it. Jf0880 (talk) 01:20, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  None of this is true
Talk:History of the Alps

message: ACK!  What a mouthful!  Is this an original article, or copied from somewhere?  Can we cut the title down to something manageable? -- Zoe
:It appears to have been a section subtitle of the Alps article taken from the 1911 Brittanica text, which was later broken out from that overlong page. --Brion
Ah, a Britannicoid. Figures. Try googling for "Where the St Gotthard train now thunders". DS 21:04, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Too long

message: This "bold" rewrite was not necessarily an improvement.
Going on about "Ancient Times" and showing as lead image "The Monument of Horace-Bénédict de Saussure and Jacques Balmat, in honor of their claimb(sic) of the Mont Blanc". This is not "history of alpinism". I don't see why these changes were kept. --dab (𒁳) 10:56, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: {{user|Lulo64}} rewrite
Talk:Omar Khayyam

message: I've removed a passage claiming that Omar Khayyam's association with heliocentrism stemmed from a mistranslation of FItzgerald . In reading the two citations, I found that one was simply text of the poetry (along with some general discussion of Fitzgerald's poetic liberties), while the other (Olson) was not about mistaken heliocentrism, but rather Fitzgerald's translation incorrectly alluding to zodiacal light with the phrase "false dawn" (a mistranslation of the Persian Sahari). Looking to the original edit , I found that the Olson source was simply used to substantiate the idea that Fitzgerald's translations were often anachronistic, and only later was the citation moved to support the statement as a whole. The claim that Omar Khayyam's association with heliocentrism stemmed from the quoted passage of poetry is not supported anywhere, and appears to have been supposition on the part of the original editor. Unfortunately, I did find a number of websites written since 2012 which now repeat the claim using similar language, so future editors should be wary of possible citogenesis. Darth Coracle (talk) 23:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heliocentrism mistranslation, OR, and citogenesis 

message: Hi, the main application of "Khayyam" refers to  "Omar Khayyam". So I think "Omar" in the article name is redundant and we can move the article to "Khayyam". Please discuss. Thanks, Hooman Mallahzadeh (talk) 17:05, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving the article to "Khayyam"
Talk:Helium

message: Where they say that large amounts of helium-4 are made in stars, add to it "and a little more from alpha decaying radioactive materials" or some variation thereof. RealNamesAreFineZ.E.O (talk) 17:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. M.Bitton (talk) 21:44, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 September 2023 

message: This very early FA needs improvement to keep its status; it has had two cleanup banners for years now, on citations and updates. The latter is especially troubling, with sentences such as "is expected to be largely depleted by 2021" and a lack of updates for issues such as conservation, the potential new molecular compounds, and applications usage. I will list this on WP:FARGIVEN, in case anyone wants to take it to FAR. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:34, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that the clean-up banners are still on the page. Would you be interested in evaluating the article to see if the banners should be removed, or do you want to nominate this to WP:FAR? Z1720 (talk) 22:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured Article status 

message: Many resources consider helium as p block element as it behaves like noble gas  AdiDas5501 (talk) 13:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It is classified as an s block element because the last shell that is filled is the 1s shell. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't Helium p-block element
Talk:Lindow Man

message: Apparently, "critics" have complained that Lindow Man is being objectified rather than treated with the respect due the dead.  This is, apparently, "part of a wider discussion about the scientific treatment of human remains".  However, we are told nothing about who these critics are, or how significant they are.  Nor are we told what (they think) "the respect due the dead" should be.  And we are told nothing about this wider discussion of the scientific treatment of human remains.  The only source cited is a 2007 news article from Culture24 that no longer exists at the link given (and searching for "Lindow Man" on their website turns up nothing).  Are these complaints actually significant? If so, I think more information (and a valid source) need to be given.  If not, do we even need this paragraph? Iapetus (talk) 09:23, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Critics have complained"
Talk:Transport puzzle

message: no consensus again per Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/KarlSchererRevisited5. --Woohookitty 07:41, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vfd #2

message: As in fact is mentioned in the article on the fifteen puzzle, Sam Loyd did not invent it. I'm removing this claim from this article as well. 91.107.171.183 (talk) 23:51, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fifteen puzzle 

message: I have tried to cite the list of types of puzzles but have not found a source for tour puzzles.  Mazes and labyrinths are certainly tour puzzles and I can find multiple sources that say Sokoban is both a maze and a transport puzzle, but nothing that makes a more general statement.  I can see the logic of having them in  transport puzzles - a maze is like a transport puzzle with only one object (the player) being moved whereas transport puzzles more usually have multiple objects.
I am also concerned with the distinction being made between mazes and labyrinths.  That strikes me as WP:OR and note there is no article on labyrinth as a puzzle (although there is a board game).
There is no source for train shunting puzzle, but this is so self-evidently a transport puzzle that I think we can keep it in per WP:BLUESKY.
While I have the sources open, here is the list of puzzles that are explicitly mentioned (some of which are not in the article)
*Source: Uduslivii
**15 puzzle
**Sliding puzzles
***Klotski
**Rail maze 2 by Spooky House Studios UG
**The fox, the goose, and the bag of beans (river crossing puzzle)
**Girls Like Robots
**Sokoban
*Source: Postma
**Sokoban
**Rush Hour (puzzle)
**Jelly no Puzzle
**Snake Bird
**Zen Puzzle Garden (oddly, also studied in an IEEE paper. That paper also names it as a transport puzzle)
*Source: Jarušek & Pelánek
**Sokoban
**Rush Hour (puzzle)
**Replacement puzzle, a puzzle invented by the mathematician Erich Friedman (known for Friedman number).
SpinningSpark 18:58, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Puzzle types
Talk:Sweatshop

message: I have removed the following paragraph for the time being. It uses a weasel term (recent studies) and should be substantiated with a reference before being re-added to the article.
:In fact, recent studies demonstrate the power sweatshops have to raise wage levels and improve working conditions in the developing world; sweatshops actually provide workers with a better option than what would otherwise be available to them.
Also, if this paragraph is added, the counter-argument should be added, since many sweatshops fail to pay a living wage... There are many kinds of sweatshops out there... Kokiri 10:42, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit

message: on a global scale, is sweated labour increasing, decreasing, or what? Is it a proven factor in the global refugee crisis? Any statisticians know? I googled 'sweatshop labour time series graph' without success Crawiki (talk) 15:01, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Data, please
Talk:Fashion Police

message: Is this the same as the 2003 series? Both shown on E! Same title, but according to this article, his one started in 2010, which contradicts the statement that it "returned."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.201.168.178 (talk) 14:45, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2003 Series 

message: Isn't this show in UK? The one with Joan Rivers and Kelly Osbourne is in UK  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.233.92.150 (talk) 00:36, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't this show in UK? The one with Joan Rivers and Kelly Osbourne is in UK 

message: Wasn't this on before 2010?  Even the history of this Wikipedia article goes back several years long.  There's also a line that says the show "returned" which makes no sense given that it says it started in 2010.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.81.55.232 (talk) 15:07, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was on before 2010?
Talk:Border Collie

message: May I cast a first vote for "Border collie", by the logic that "the Borders" is a name for a region, and we would write "When people see French poodles, they...".
AFTER we come to a consensus on this... or after, say, 2/2023, if no one has contested my arguement... getting the capitalization consistent thoughout the article might be worth the effort?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tkbwik (talk • contribs) 13:24, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you reiterate your position?  I don't see that it's presently on this talk page, and if it's already archived that could hamper the discussion. ~TPW 15:06, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

text: Standardised breed names should be capitalised, so the name should always be written as Border Collie except in quotes. Traumnovelle (talk) 18:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That's correct, details are at MOS:LIFE. 184.152.68.190 (talk) 18:49, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  In mid sentence: "Border collie" or "border collie"? 

message: In this section it states: Additional causes of death are
Collie eye anomaly
Hip dysplasia
Epilepsy
Hearing loss[13]
Elbow dysplasia
Addison Disease
It really isn't possible for a collie to die from hearing loss, or Elbow Dysplasia.  The source indicates that these are more common in the breed and I will amendBobBadg (talk) 13:52, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Life Span section

message: I rather laboriously changed all the instances of "Border Collie" that weren't in titles to lowercase "border collie", more in the interest of consistency than owing to any personal preference. Only afterwards I noticed that "Irish Setter" was consistently capitalized in that breed's article, suggesting that, as  pointed out when he reverted, the names of other breeds are also capitalized. That's fine, but I checked and there are now forty instances of lowercase "border collie" in the article. I'm too B/border C/collied out to bother with this further, but perhaps someone would like to fix it (unless there's some sense to the on-again off-again capitalization that I've missed). Bret Sterling (talk) 17:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't notice that myself, I will go ahead and change all instances (besides those in quotes which may need checking). There isn't any official consensus on capitalisation but the vast majority of pages capitalise standardised breeds. In academic writing there is a split between the two. Traumnovelle (talk) 17:45, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization of breed
Talk:Essential amino acid

message: There is a suggestion in the article that only animal-based food can provide all essential amino acids (EAAs). That is not true and should be corrected. Most of the plants contain all EAAs. Looking at Swedish Food Agancy's "Amino acids in food" also checking ingredients at FoodData Central  we can see that most of the plant-based food contain all EAAs.
Although most of the plants have low EAAs content there are examples that soybeans, beans, nuts, quinoa are rich in EAAs. Soybeans meal contain actually more EAAs in total than beef, chicken or fish and it has the lowest sample food required to provide a total amount of EAAs equal to the recommended daily sum of total EAAs.
Furthermore:
Plant Foods Have a Complete Amino Acid Composition
"Soy, brown rice, pea, corn, and potato protein have essential amino acid contents that meet the requirements as recommended by the WHO/FAO/UNU (WHO/FAO/UNU Expert Consultation 2007) (Fig. 2). In addition, the essential amino acid content of potato protein (37%) is in fact greater when compared with casein (34%) and egg (32%). These data suggest that certain plant-based proteins could theoretically provide sufficient essential amino acids to allow a robust postprandial stimulation of muscle protein synthesis."
Well, I think the article needs improvement and update regarding EAAs in plant-based food.
Regards
Guniarz (talk) 14:09, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Essential amino acids in plants new paragraph needed 

message: nonessential 112.79.96.23 (talk) 13:28, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  biochemistry 

message: This is the first time I have seen taurine included in a list of amino acids.
Taurine is referred to as an "amino acid" in the article. It is a common misconception that taurine is an amino acid according to https://sciencenotes.org/why-taurine-is-not-an-amino-acid/
"In addition, cysteine, tyrosine, and arginine are considered semiessential amino acids, and taurine a semiessential aminosulfonic acid in children. The metabolic pathways that synthesize these monomers are not fully developed." says https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amino_acid in its *only* mention of taurine. So is taurine an aminosulfonic acid rather than an amino acid? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sulfamic_acid says, "Sulfamic acid, also known as amidosulfonic acid, amidosulfuric acid, aminosulfonic acid, sulphamic acid and sulfamidic acid, is a molecular compound with the formula H3NSO3." The article makes no mention of amino acids. So it seems that an aminosulfonic acid is not an amino acid. Polar Apposite (talk) 16:41, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is taurine really an amino acid? 

message: US NAM figures for RDAs of EAAs/BCAAs are given on the referenced source in "mg/g of protein" rather than "mg/kg of body weight", which makes this table confusing to look at, I believe the US NAM figures all need to be multiplied by 0.8 (the amount of protein per kg weight that is recommended in that same paper), for the numbers to be in a consistent unit. Threeheadedpuppy (talk) 14:29, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  RDA of essential amino acids table misleading
Talk:Sola scriptura

message: It seems likely that the more extreme position on Biblical authority (e.g. there IS NO authority between the Bible and the Reader) is more correctly termed Solo scriptura (or Tradition 0 if we use Heiko Oberman's terminology), and should be separated into its own category after Prima Scriptura. Washi (talk) 20:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: SolA versus SolO scriptura

message: See: http://www.catholicfaithandreason.org/the-canon-of-the-old-testament.html
Overall, this article is bias in favor of the Protestants and is not balanced.
Bro. Ignatius Mary 23:54, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect statement that Jesus used the Palestinian Canon. This canon did not exist until around 90 A.D.

message: I was disappointed today to see that Sola Scriptura has no History section. Can editors with access to this information please add that section? Thank you! Misty MH (talk) 01:44, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  No History section
Wikipedia talk:User preferences help

message: We need one place to develop MediaWiki documentation so I'm starting a project-neutral MediaWiki User's Guide in meta and think it would be a good idea to cross wiki redirect this page to meta:MediaWiki User's Guide: Setting preferences as soon as I'm done with the conversion. --mav
:The MediaWiki user's guide is a good idea, but I am very unhappy with the idea of using cross wiki redirects from pages such as this.  Help pages are there primarily for new users, and should be as helpful and user friendly as possible.  For new users to find themselves automatically redirected to another would make things confusing for them - why should they expect to end up in another website just because they asked for help?.  
:Granted, not using an inter-wiki redirect will make it harder to keep this page and similar help pages on other wikis updated in line with the best and most accurate version.  But our priority should be to make the help pages helpful, not to make life easier for ourselves as contributors. Enchanter 12:58, 31 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not happy about this going to meta either. It just adds confusion. You don't want new users feeling they have to read a whole MediaWiki user guide before they even begin. Meta could say something generic about preferences, but language specific help pages should stay on each Wikipedia. Why would you move this help page off en:, but leave the German one, for example, at de:Wikipedia:Handbuch - Einstellungen? Angela 13:07, 31 Aug 2003 (UTC)

text: Fair point. I hadn't considered the duplication at Wikibooks et al. It does need to be made clear to newbies visiting the page that meta is a different site though. Angela 20:30, 31 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving this page to meta soon
Talk:Cinema of China

message: Over a period of time, I have done some revising on cinema that is significant from a political-historical perspective. I believe it has significantly improved the article. 
We could use some work on the artistic or entertainment aspects of cinema: trimming unsourced, refining the presentation, and so forth. 
Is there anyone out there who would feel confident in doing so?  JArthur1984 (talk) 12:52, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tightening/trimming from the artistic/entertainment perspective?
Talk:Go professional

message: This article is silly.  We should just integrate it into the Go (board game) entry (which already has half this content anyway) and delete it. --k.lee
:Rather, it should be renamed to a more standard English entry such as professional Go play, with info from the overly large Go article incorporated. The Go article needs to be broken up. --The Cunctator
::We should move it into the Go article if the subject page is unlikely to become much larger than it is currently.
::However, I can see it expanded to contain a list of the major prizes, with current prize holders and brief bios of the major players. If this is done well, it would become large enough to justify its existence as a separate article.
::In order to plan ahead, my vote would be to keep the subject page as it is. I also agree that the big Go article should be broken up. David 17:57 Oct 11, 2002 (UTC)
:::Just my 2c, I think it's a page that's needed (not only because I've linked to it externally). Sensei's Library, for example, has a lot of information and discussion about pros. It's part of the... culture of Internet go. And Hikaru no Go, which is how a lot of people recently have been introduced to go, is all about the pro scene (only a slight exaggeration). I don't too much mind the idea of changing the name to professional Go play as suggested by The Cunctator, but I feel personally that the core concept here is more about the professional Go scene than about the actual play of the game (after all, only the pros can really understand that). BenBildstein 10:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I say the page should be kept, but updated and expanded with information about how the pro status is attained in different organisations. There is little or less information about that available in English.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.240.231.17 (talk) 08:25, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep or merge? 

message: The last paragraph of the introduction states that go is on a decline. I think this should be deleted because if anything, the new AI has boosted the interest in Go. Samwri (talk) 22:43, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You're correct. The source offered no support to this claim, so I've removed it. Mattpartridge24 (talk) 19:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Go is not declining?
Talk:Al Gore

message: someone needs to add his third daughter and al gore III to this his two daughter are on his why arent they 2603:6011:5601:B8F5:65D2:EF74:F396:E2A6 (talk) 18:42, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? Are they notable? – Muboshgu (talk) 18:43, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone make a page for his son Albert iii and his other daughter  

message: The text says that Gore won the popular election by "APPROXIMATELY 543,895 votes". Now, approximately means CLOSE TO a particular number or time although not exactly that number or time. 543,895 is a round and precise number. Either write "EXACTLY 543,895" or just quote the number, without an adverb preceding it. 2804:D84:2280:2400:6F91:F3D:19FB:6CA0 (talk) 00:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct. I have fixed the article. HiLo48 (talk) 01:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  MISUSE OF THE WORD "APPROXIMATELY"