lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Brown Brigade

message: Whoever uploaded the image needs to provide the source info for the picture or it might get deleted.--Cory pratt 15:20, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image with Dave Baksh 

message: To the person wondering where the logo is from, its from MySpace. In fact, heres a bigger version of it, directly off the page.
http://a963.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/40/l_cfa629625dfefc5785bed38c37454822.jpg —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.154.255.62 (talk) 21:55, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The logo is from their MySpace 

message: the offical brown brigade web site is not correct.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.118.218.43 (talk) 17:30, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  link 
Talk:Montessori School of Louisville

message: There was a great deal of unsourced content, and a good bit of what seemed to me to be advertising.  I have moderated the language,and cut a great deal of wp:OR.  If there are wp:RS that say that, then perhaps it should be added with sources.
Also restructured the article a bit, and added missing sections.
07:36, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cuts
Talk:Connie Mack III

message: Is his legal name "McGillicuddy" or is it "Mack"? I am under the impression that the original Connie Mack changed his name and so "Mack" is his actual name and not just a nickname. Acsenray 15:22, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: I am having much difficulty reading this {& related articles}.  The name issue overwhelms.  Also, He has a grandfather, he has a son; but, he has no parent, neither father, nor mother?  If either is listed, it is not apparent, to me.  If it is there, could it be clarified, please?
Thank You,
 hopiakuta  Please do  sign  your  signature  on your  message.  %7e%7e   Thank You. - 02:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[ apparent ]][[ wiktionary:apparent ]] 

message: I noticed that as this article progresses toward the bottom, the language used becomes more flattering to the subject and there is exponentially more focus on promotional talking points that one might find on a campaign website.  Use of phrases like "landmark legislation" and "numerous awards" and "helped to establish" can even seem so vague, yet overtly positive in tone as to be a marketing or campaign effort.  Did nobody ever disagree with this person on any topic?  Forgive me if I've done anything wrong in terms of adding the NPOV tag in brackets at the top of the article page or if this current note was to be placed elsewhere on the talk page.  I always have trouble figuring out how these things are done on here. Thanks.
98.203.17.49 (talk) 03:51, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm inclined to take the tag off the top of the article and leave the one on the Tenure section. Swliv (talk) 00:47, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV Language/Style Issue
Talk:Polling (computer science)

message: The accompanying article should probably be expanded and renamed from Polling (computer science) to (probably) Polling (electronics), a title that also includes the closely related polling in electronics, fire alarms, and (probably) telecommunications.  (The last is doubtful only bcz it would also apply to non-electronic com systems like optical telegraphy.) If there is a need to distinguish among polling in those areas, to the extent of separate articles,  that may emerge in writing the overall article.
I credit a colleague (whom i haven't troubled to identify) for drawing my attention to this point. They asserted it using -- mistakenly, since "poll" is not used in those articles -- the Dab Poll. --Jerzy•t 17:21, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's used in broader ways in modern computer science as well, to refer to basically anything that periodically checks (polls) for data or a condition. For example, a common setup of computer-music systems is for a computation thread to generate music, which it puts into queue; a second thread polls the queue periodically to see if there are things to output. (An alternative design uses semaphores or something similar to wake up the second thread instead of having it poll.) From that viewpoint, polling a physical device is just a special case. --Delirium (talk) 06:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broaden scope?
Talk:Longniddry Primary School

message: This article has very obvious biased language. Please reword it to confom to a neutral point of view Lurker talk 15:26, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: You need to provide content and establish your notability if you want to avoid deletion. Dahliarose 22:50, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess
Talk:Souls in the Great Machine

message: I started this stub today and will add some more information later when I have more time RussS 15:31, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Need for Speed III: Hot Pursuit

message: I think we should show a picture of the game's box or cd in this article.--Taida 22:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Isn't this the description of Need for Speed 2 (Tracks and Cars!!)? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.77.110.187 (talk • contribs).
:No. And I speak as one who has played both NFS 2 and NFS 3. The lists are different. ╫ ２５ ◀RingADing▶ 16:06, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsectioned comment by 83.77.110.187

message: As you can see, I added a section called "special tracks."  They are unlockable by cheat codes (Which I included.)  I just wanted to say because it may look weird and all. 67.150.11.4 05:01, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I read about it in GameFAQs too. I'm just as equally curious as to what they look like. Thanks for adding it in, although I have to undo the removal of a note. ╫ ２５ ◀RingADing▶ 16:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I added some special tracks for the PS version 

message: These are game guide materials, and have been removed. DurinsBane87 17:46, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists of cars and tracks 

message: I distinctly remember reading an article which stated that both Mercedes and Ferrari were not particularly keen to have their vehicles associated with police chases, hence their not being included in hot pursuit mode. If I can find the article (because it was a web based article, gamespy I think, round 1998/99) I'll add the reference or link. (121.45.20.59 12:35, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is fascinating. I always wondered why that was the case, though I can't say I ever felt the urge to chase a Maranello down with the Pursuit Corvette. Thanks for broadening my NFS knowledge :) SMC (talk) 17:26, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mercedes/Ferraris and Hot Pursuit mode. 

message: It lists a minimum of 4 VRAM when the oficial Spec is only 1 MB, it only needs a card with Hicolor 16 bit support in order to run the game. Also the reference is wrong, it links to Bioshock requirements.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.130.185.8 (talk) 19:31, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  PC game requirements 

message: PC game requirements are all wrong. No wonder, since they were retrieved from mobygames, which generates most of them automatically. 
For example, NFSIII does NOT run in Windows 2000/XP, only in "windows 95/98" compatibility mode. Also, what's the point of recommending Direct X 9.0 when no such thing was invented by then. ROLF! Any DirectX 6.0 card is enough to run the game in full detail, as long it has about 16Megs of memory.
Also, the link doesn't link to any minimum requirements
I removed the section, please add it again only if you find the correct requirements
For help, I found this: http://www.neoseeker.com/Games/Products/PC/nfs3/
No time to add it in main article, I have to go.
  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.130.121.48 (talk) 11:37, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: NFSIII runs fine in XP. Griffinofwales (talk) 14:49, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  PC game requirements again
Talk:Room at the Top (novel)

message: As far as I am aware, this never aired due to a disagreement between the author and production. 2.217.128.170 (talk) 01:24, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "followed in 2011 by a tv film."  Did not air. 

message: Hello all
I have expanded the plot summary in order to make the class theme clearer and include some important plot points. I have also moved the information about adaptations from the lead to a new section. I will expand this section in due course. Happy to discuss. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 13:23, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary and lead
Talk:Decomposer (album)

message: The date the album leaked has no use here and does not need to be posted on this page or ANY album page. --Exthuse 15:35, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album leak 
Talk:V-Rally (video game)

message: Not sure which is correct here. Here it says "Original titles include "V-Rally", which has sold over 4.7 million units across nearly 60 countries.". Is this accurate? Timur9008 (talk) 18:45, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sales
Talk:Dynamic program analysis

message: Really doesn't belong on this page.  It is a static analysis tool and should be moved to that article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.34.100.161 (talk) 04:38, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Polyspace

message: Shouldn't this page just redirect to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performance_analysis ?
Or the pages somehow be intertwined? It seems to me the dynamic program analysis article could be replaced completely with the Performance analysis article above. The article should probably be renamed from Performance Analysis to Dynamic binary analysis (that would make more sense to me)
: I oppose this merge. Profiling is a sufficiently well-know type of analysis to qualify for a separate article per WP:GNG. Pcap ping 17:20, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose Dynamic analysis goes beyond performance analysis. It's a unique topic. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 16:33, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

text: I oppose this merge for the reasons given above. siddharthist (talk) 13:27, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

text: I oppose this merge; performance analysis (for example) is not a form of runtime verification. siddharthist (talk) 13:27, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: As on other articles, such as List of tools for static code analysis, products being included should be notable, as evidenced by having their own wiki article. Accordingly I will be cleaning up the list for those that don't meet these criteria. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 21:16, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: List criteria

message: The opening paragraph should just define the term. The Ariane example does not belong there (it isn't really related to this article more than any other software bug; moreover dynamic analysis is not just testing for bugs). Neither do recommendations on how to instrument. 85.64.127.135 (talk) 18:55, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening paragraph 

message: Versus Static program analysis or Program analysis for example. Needed updated. :)
69.26.74.42 (talk) 02:05, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing information: Incomplete article
Talk:Lemuel H. Arnold

message: Another problem is WP:UNDUE. Genealogists tend to ignore/skip and otherwise "lose" "undesirablo" ancestors. We each have 2 parents, 4 gparents, 8 ggparents, 16 gggparents, and 32 ggggparents, about the distance of Arnold's. What about the other 31 ggggparents? "Nothing is known." Why not? Because they were indentured servants, Indian descendant, expelled from the church, etc. etc. Those are "forgotten" by genealogy. Don't look good. This has probably all been discussed at length long before, else we'd have huge genealogies blanketing presidents. There aren't. So there is a rule someplace.
Another one, is, of course, WP:TOPIC. This is about Arnold, not some distant, and most likely forgotten at the time, ancestor. Student7 (talk) 03:26, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In archive: []. No relevance can be clearly shown between Arnold and this ancestor. Shouldn't be mentioned at all.WP:IRR. BTW most of us, if of English descent (80%), are descended from Edward II. So what?Student7 (talk) 03:38, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ancient ancestor
Talk:Washington Square (novel)

message: Don't much care for the recent rearrangement of the article, but I won't get into an edit war over it. We've now got some too-short paragraphs and sections and generally less interesting prose. The article was rated B-class (better than over 85% of all other articles about novels, and worse than only a handful of those articles) before the revisions. And those revisions hardly seem like an improvement to me. Sorry for the harsh opinion, but it's my honest opinion. Casey Abell 12:33, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent revisions

message: " He tried to read it over" -- what does this mean?  Is it another way of saying "He tried to re-write it" or does it perhaps mean "He tried to read it again"?Kdammers (talk) 09:14, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear meaning? 

message: Quote:
:Anyhow, I hadn’t read “Washington Square” for a decade, and happily dove into what Wikipedia calls “a structurally simple tragicomedy that recounts the conflict between a dull but sweet daughter and her brilliant, unemotional father.” While technically accurate, that summary undersells the book. It is a roller coaster.
-- GreenC 04:19, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article quoted in the NYT 

message: This article reads like a college essay. Tons of original research, footnotes containing subjective conclusions, and no plot to speak of. I've added some maintenance tags and may have a go at it unless someone else who's read the book recently wants to step up. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 07:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a Rewrite
Talk:Grog (clay)

message: Hello all,
The following section of the text is clearly wrong: "Grog is also a critical ingredient in ceramic rocket motor nozzles and bulkheads as Grog particles have sharp edges and angles which lock the clay structure together and thus prevent the clay layers from being ripped out by the supersonic exhaust jet." As nozzles are ceramic and not clay ... maybe they were formed from clay (although non-clay ceramic materials are much more likely) but after firing the article is no longer clay. I suggest this is re-written or even removed. Any comments?
Regards,
Andy
_______________________
Grog is also used as a strengthening and temperature control element in the construction of molds for kiln formed glass, and probably used in other high temperature molds too. Anyone willing to add this application to the page?
165.228.173.3 (talk) 22:09, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Tabor Academy, Braintree

message: I will hopefully be rewriting this article soon and in the process, I will be adding new information and cleaning up the article. Jedmiller 15:48, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: :The school started life in the early part of the twentieth century on Panfield Lane. While co-educational girls and boys were separated, with the school effectively split into two parts. Later with the introduction of the 1944 Education Act the school opened as a newly established secondary modern school and was a coeducational school. It was renamed the Margaret Tabor Secondary Modern School. 
The preceding is incorrect. I attended this school for my secondary education 1950 to 1954. It was still girls one side boys the other. Looking at the school the boys section was on the left. Our pocket patches identified the school as Panfield Lane Secondary Modern.
I have just checked the records for the school at the Kew Records Office. The author/s of the part you dispute are correct: at least according to the official records. The refernce for the entry is Margaret Tabor Secondary Modern School (5674LEAES).   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.178.87 (talk) 09:56, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I'll make some changes. Abductive (reasoning) 23:32, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed history
Talk:Paul O'Prey

message: Copyright to the information on http://www.roehampton.ac.uk/about/governance/pauloprey.html to which the infringement is referring belongs to Roehampton University, and namely Paul O'Prey (the Vice-Chancellor), for whom I work.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by L h hurley (talk • contribs) 15:49, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The copyright belongs to Roehampton University. Medtopic 20:17, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

text: The copyright belongs to Roehampton University. What is your affiliation with Roehampton University? -Medtopic 15:26, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: L h hurley/38kp, I have seen your claims on Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Poster claims permission. When copying and pasting information from elsewhere to Wikipedia, please keep in mind that there are other issues besides copyright. Per Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, Wikipedia is not a mirror or a soapbox. I would encourage you to re-write the article in a Temp page that conforms to Wikipedia policy and guidelines. Thanks! -Medtopic 16:59, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: close connection changes have been undone except for a few minor edits, references and links Dgp2015 (talk) 12:25, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  close connection
Talk:Coliform bacteria

message: Craun, G. F., Berger, P. S., & Calderon, R. L. (1997). Coliform bacteria and waterborne disease outbreaks. Journal‐American Water Works Association, 89(3), 96-104
This is a peer-reviewed scientific journal and is a reliable source for this article. It is a secondary source with a variety of different contributors. This article goes into depth about the effects of coliform bacteria, which is not touched on in this article so it would be a good area to improve on.
Jeon, D. J., Ligaray, M., Kim, M., Kim, G., Lee, G., Pachepsky, Y. A., ... & Cho, K. H. (2019). Evaluating the influence of climate change on the fate and transport of fecal coliform bacteria using the modified SWAT model. Science of the Total Environment, 658, 753-762.
This is a peer-reviewed scientific journal and a reliable source to be used in this article. It is a secondary source with several different authors and published within the last 5 years.
Tominaga, T. (2019). Rapid detection of coliform bacteria using a lateral flow test strip assay. Journal of microbiological methods, 160, 29-35.
This is a peer-reviewed journal specifically for describing methods in microbiology. This is a good source to include in this article because it expands on the topic of how coliform bacteria are detected in lab. ZM9900 (talk) 17:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 

message: 168 residences moll up to 10 ago before new 136.158.58.122 (talk) 15:21, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  DMCI
Talk:Steam shower

message: Umm, want a page on "normal" showers and their history, can't find anything on it. Even encarta has decent info on it, wtf? JayKeaton 16:01, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See Shower. -- Beland (talk) 18:54, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Normal showers

message: The last comment on this page is rather misleading... With reference to the articles on water vapour and steam; they are the same thing. Water in it's gaseous state, invisible. It's only when it condenses and mixes with air (liquid water droplets suspended in air) that is becomes visible. Flippin42 09:10, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I reworded the sentence using the first part of steam as a guide.  I'm not sure if the sentence is even required, feel free to change or remove it - I honestly don't know the technical distinction (if any) between steam and water vapor.   Be bold! skip (t / c) 06:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: An accurate description would be condensed water vapor.  --User101010 (talk) 00:12, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steam vs. Water vapour 

message: Is it just me, or does this article read like an ad? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Simen 88 (talk • contribs).
:I agree that the article has POV issues, and recently several commercial links have been added repeatedly.  I've tried to make the article more neutral, but I've never even seen a steam shower.  Be bold! skip (t / c) 06:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement

message: There is a non commercial site called *[steamshower.net] that seems to have some additional information.  Perhaps it can be brought here.
:That's a commercial URL. I've seen you use two user accounts to post that URL however it is a professional advertisement site for Adam Simmons. —Tokek 15:45, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Non Commercial

message: located in the reference page and the external links page (removed prior to this post)
Thermasol is a commercial dealer of steam showers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.127.117.187 (talk) 06:04, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Commercial links to Thermasol 

message: This page was obviously created almost solely with commercial motivations. If deleltion is asking too much, then surely it could be shortened and merged with the shower article? I mean just how wide-spread are steam showers, really? Do they deserve a whole page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.181.153.16 (talk) 08:17, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Candidate for deletion?
Talk:Stanton upon Hine Heath

message: This is a stub for a village and parish - please don't delete! David 16:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Talk:Whixall David 16:06, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also 

message: I do not know the parish boundaries of Stanton but I question how germane the sections on Moreton Corbet Castle and RAF Shawbury airfield are unless they fell within Stanton's boundaries or had some facet of their history that directly impinged on Stanton. The sections could be condensed, perhaps reduced to reminders of their proximity to Stanton.  I also question the relevance of the paragraphs about the Great Reform Act as it affected Parliamentary, not parish boundaries: Parish Councils came into being in 1894, over 60 years later.Cloptonson (talk) 20:12, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Having seen no reply made in the two intervening years in favour of keeping the subsection about the Great Reform Act, and noticing that its citation (from BBC History website) mentions nothing of Stanton, I am hereby going to delete this subsection for irrelevance.Cloptonson (talk) 20:26, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

text: Now I know that Moreton Corbet is a separate parish from Stanton and today part of a civil parish merged with that of Lee Brockhurst, I have decided to delete the subsection on the Castle for irrelevance.Cloptonson (talk) 06:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Extraneous Information?
Talk:Hair gel

message: "Though it is said that hair gel causes hair loss, this is unproven."
Who said this...Elhombre72 12:02, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No citations

message: I have redirected hair glue here, seeing as it is virtually the same thing --UltraMagnus (talk) 01:09, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  hair glue 

message: I came to this article hoping to learn what hair gel is made of, and I'm disappointed that there's nothing about that here. I suggest a section on the basic ingredients, with some attention to how hair gel differs from other products, like pomade or hair wax. I will try to find some sources that discuss this and post them here so this can be discussed further. 98.235.32.78 (talk) 06:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ingredients 

message: i think the picture is a joke. what is that a 13 year old?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.50.119.13 (talk) 22:31, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Mesaconic acid

message: An editor added the following remark to the page, I moved it here:
Note the structures given here are incorrect. Mesaconic acid has only 5 carbon atoms  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.7.35.160 (talk • contribs) 
--Dirk Beetstra T C 16:09, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed now. --Ed (Edgar181) 16:28, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is that it .. OK .. Cheers Ed!  --Dirk Beetstra T C 17:28, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong?