lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Radio Free Roscoe

message: When The N went to their 24/7 channel, They brought back old shows including Radio Free Roscoe.
WebYoungProgrammerMsg me 11:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFR back on The N 

message: For a year, before The N went 24/7, They stopped broadcasting the reruns in order to fit shows like Dawson's Creek into their programming line-up. I wasn't sure how to word it, so I'll leave it up to better Wikipedians to add this information to the article.
WebYoungProgrammerMsg me 12:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stopped Broadcasting 
Talk:Kirby Ian Andersen

message: - N (talk) 09:09, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion nominations

message: I have added merge tags to this and Shinjuku zulu. It's the same person and much of the information is the same. Please use this area to post comments on the proposed move. I've also added an  tag to reflect comments made in the AfD discussion. - N (talk) 15:42, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me, and thanks for adding that advert tag. --Qirex 11:46, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have now redirected Shinjuku zulu to this article. I copied the Vocalists info to the relevant album pages where necessary, but the rest was duplication and promotion. I'm also going to merge Shinjuku Zulu and Shinjuku Zulu CD too unless anyone has any objections. - N (talk) 13:50, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge
Talk:St. Louis Argus

message: Following the apparent copyright vio by user 24.207.161.196, I have moved the previously existing version of the article (which was not a copyright vio) to the temporary subpage page so that it can be restored once the copyright vio version is removed. Ropcat 09:10, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "One primary goal of the St. Louis Argus was to organize the Negro community"
I think "Negro" should be changed to Black. Even though the statement is about the history, it is neither necessary or appropriate to use the old label in this context to refer to the general community which exists in the present as well as the historical context being referred to.
Black is just as correct, and far less offensive.
Moorewarner (talk) 04:19, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor usage of outdated/offensive historical term that serves no purpose
Talk:Ogoni people

message: As an Ogoni person now living in the United state, the first Ogoni day was held on the 4th day of January 1993 and not 3rd January 1993 as recorded in your article. Signed Ndem Oduu
Ogoni refers to both the people and there homeland (according to the article).  Ogoni and Ogoniland both redirect here to Ogoni People.  We should either rename the title and include the geographical material or separate it and change the redirects. RJFJR (talk) 17:04, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.rogerblench.info/Language%20data/Niger-Congo/Benue-Congo/Cross%20River/Ogoni/Comparative%20Ogonic%20RMB.pdf (page 5) (content added in this series of edits) and  (content added in this edit). Infringing material has been removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:30, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: This article has a problem with giving the population of the Ogonis. In the text, its says 1.5 Million. In the table it says 850,000. In the footnotes, it says that there are many estimates, and cites  "over 20 million"; Nzewi (quoted in Agawu), p. 31, says "about 15 million"; Okafor, p. 86, says "about twenty-five million"; Okpala, p. 21, says "around 30 million"; and Smith, p. 508, says "approximately 20 million". Can somebody provide a more accurate and helpful number?--94.208.75.76 (talk) 23:27, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ogoni population
Talk:Baltimore Visitors Center

message: December 5th, 2005 - Readded pictures with a more specific fair use tag. - KSweeley
:Those were using  which is for actual scans of newspaper pages. In order to keep the number of fair use images to a minimum, I have removed most of them. The map, for example, is totally superfluous because readers can find one on the BVC web site. howcheng  {chat} 22:46, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Echo (Cork newspaper)

message: Anybody know the date that the Echo became a tabloid? Irlchrism 17:54, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Blowback (firearms)

message: incorrect information
-delayed blowback
--Lever delayed
--- Benelli 76
The benelli is a inertia/lever locked gun. As a locked breech gun it can not be a blowback! 2A02:3038:2E0:63F9:25CB:B8D7:DCAF:E4F9 (talk) 07:33, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Information
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 32

message: It seems to me that everyone supports the general gist of this guideline, for whatever reason, except jguk who wishes to avoid instruction creep and Chuck who sees it as being part of good English anyway.  (Correct me if I'm wrong.  Five other contributors have signalled a support.
For I carry on with the whole consensus and proposal thing, I want to point out first that this would not be a complete ban and that in instances where it needs to be used, it can be used — but in most (in fact, almost all) cases, it will probably apply.  It is, after all, just a guideline; editors will never be reprimanded for not adhering to it and if an article is out of line, someone will come and patch it up.
Also, I want to note that the rules of good English are debatable — just look at this page and its archives — so I'm a bit sceptical about most users taking it for granted.
But anyway, that aside, it would be worth deciding on a good wording for the addition.  Do we point out that it is a factual omission, or just that it is considered poor encyclopedic style?  Or should we say both?  Is it necessary to include a word like "generally" to avoid misinterpretations of it being an outright ban?  What section does it get added to?
Here's something to get started with:
Use of the second person ("you") is generally discouraged.  Instead, refer to the subject of the sentence, for example:
*"When a player moves past "GO," that player collects $200."
*Not: "When you move past "GO," you collect $200."
This does not apply to quoted text, which should be quoted exactly.
If we want to say why, "to specify who the sentence refers to" could be added before "for example" (its being bad style is kind of given, I think, that's why it's here in the first place!).  Any suggested changes? Neonumbers 23:17, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: For what it's worth, I'm also happy with this being in the manual. As rationale, I would point out both reasons. Until we can't think of any exceptions, other than quoting, I can't see why it shouldn't be an outright ban. As for where to put it, I suggest right after "Avoid self-referential pronouns". PizzaMargherita 07:58, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur that the suggested section should be added to the Manual of Style, for the reasons given by user Ke6jjj and everyone else.  --Coolcaesar 15:14, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Any example will do, feel free to provide one that'll work better.  Wording, too, is open to proposals; no-one seems to be complaining about the gist of it.  :-) Neonumbers 10:07, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Addition to Manual?
Talk:Unshielded twisted pair

message: This stub is unlikely to ever be expanded into a full article. The twisted pair article however is pretty short and could use some more content. I believe a merging of this article into that article would be appropriate. N. Harmon 01:26, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly, I'm thinking that it should probably be deleted and have UTP and Unshielded twisted pair redirect to twisted pair.  The only thing that this article contains that isn't in twisted pair is the part about Ethernet not being reliable, which seems like an odd thing to throw into a 5 sentence blurb about UTP.  Besides, I'm not really sure that there is all that much to say about UTP that doesn't describe all twisted-pair cable (tho i could be wrong).  Messiahxi 22:37, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds sensible to me. -- Randall00 Talk 16:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Twisted Pair]]
Talk:Bristol Community Church

message: I would suggest that the writer of this article is probably a young person with a personal connection with the church, hence the source would be his/her personal knowledge.
This is current information, so the following quote from the article Wikipedia:No_original_research would apply:
In some cases, where an article (1) makes descriptive claims the accuracy of which is easily verifiable by any reasonable adult without specialist knowledge, and (2) makes no analytic, synthetic, interpretive, or evaluative claims, a Wikipedia article may be based entirely on primary sources (examples would include apple pie or current events), but these are exceptions.
He/she would benefit from getting an account with Wikipedia!
An organisation that can bring one of the huge empty Kingswood chapels back to life as a church is a significant development - one can only hope that it will have as life-changing efects on the community as the original chapels no doubt had.
--PeterR 10:09, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: No sources

message: Both the website and the building label call it "Bourne Christian Centre" (BS15 8BE). Was it renamed? Someone needs to update the article. kovsky (talk) 13:21, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bourne Christian Centre? 
Talk:Elm Tree, Ontario

message: Looks like an advertisement to me. I'll clean it up a bit later, make it more "encyclopedia" worthy. Less caps and such.
: There's virtually nothing there - certainly not a community.  Elm Tree isn't notable, so I've changed it to become a redirect to Central Frontenac.  PKT(alk) 15:22, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aaron Peasley

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. —KGV 09:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Glenferrie Road

message: Should this be moved to Glenferrie Road, Melbourne? This tends to be the norm for Melbourne street articles. Remy B 10:23, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the article to reflect the standard naming of Melbourne streets. Remy B 14:00, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hardware Lane

message: Should this be moved to Hardware Lane, Melbourne? Remy B 10:41, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved. Two stripe 06:01, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Collins Street, Melbourne - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 12:21, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 08:47, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style
Talk:Chinese language romanisation in Singapore

message: The most inconsistently romanised words I know of is the surname 欧阳, which is written as Ouyang, O'Young, Owyang, Au Yong, Auyong, Au Yeung. My chinese teacher told us that within his immediate family, there are three different romanised surnames of 欧阳, thanks to those birth registration officers in pre-independence days. --Vsion 11:23, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh this would be worth a mention in the article itself, although it is probably difficult to find sources to verify it.--Huaiwei 13:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  An example of inconsistency
Talk:Masako Nozawa

message: Someone is going to have to be more specific on this. The U.S. title is far too vague. Is it Go Lion, or Dairugger XV? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Brittany Ka (talk • contribs) 13:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Voltron? 

message: Does anyone here know any specific reason that Nozawa was retained as the Japanese voice of adult Goku albeit being an elderly woman [with the voice of any elderly woman]? This must be among the most significant anomalies in the recent history of Japan's arts and entertainment industry. - 118.100.122.138 (talk) 04:57, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goku
Talk:Yes! (U.S. magazine)

message: This topic seems notable enough, but the poor quality of the article would seem to belie that opinion.  It needs to be cleaned up.Philip Stevens 11:45, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

message: There is some confusion over the date when PFN was founded.  In 2004, the URL: http://yesmagazine.org/aboutPFN.html (web archive copy) led to a page which began "In 1996, a group of practical visionaries including author David Korten and editor Sarah Ruth van Gelder, founded the Positive Futures Network (PFN)".  That is why the article stated as much.  However, as of 2008, the page that URL points to doesn't mention 1996 anywhere.  It discusses what PFN is currently doing, but doesn't discuss the history or founding of the group.  The establishment date of YES! Magazine is affected by this because the date of the first issue is not 1996, but Winter 1997.  Since the PFN founding date is no longer mentioned on the magazine's website, and is actually less  relevant than the date of the first issue, I've changed the article to refer to a establishment date of 1997, and cited the archives of the magazine.  I wanted to explain the full mess here. 75.214.238.186 (talk) (really, User:JesseW/not logged in) 23:51, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In his self-bio here, David Korten writes:"The beginning of 1996, I co-founded with Sarah van Gelder and other colleagues the Positive Futures Network, which publishes YES! magazine, and have since served as board chair." Is there anything unusual about an organisation's start date differing from that of a magazine it later initiated? Cheers Bjenks (talk) 05:11, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founding date of PFN 

message: I mention this because the article is about a social-justice-related publication and all social-justice issues are feminist issues (and vice versa): Why is van Gelder listed as 'Korten's wife' rather than Korten listed as 'van Gelder's husband'? I.e., Why is the woman defined by her relation to a man? -and- Why is it relevant at all that they're married (to one another)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.30.21.82 (talk) 03:43, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chauvinist Framing
Talk:Elisabeth of Romania

message: Is anyone aware why Elisabeth has middle names and her siblings don't appear to?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2angelgoats (talk • contribs) 14:18, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle names 

message: while i was able to introduce into the article the link to the house of romania, i was not able to place the princess's name in it. any advice on how to do it or anyone willing to do it for me?
*Went ahead with that.  Left instructions on Talk:Marie of Romania.  Glad to help.Prsgoddess187 13:04, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is that really a photograph of Queen Elisabeth, or is it her mother-in-law or somebody else?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 
208.114.148.61 (talk) 01:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  pic 

message: It would be nice to indicate that this work is a translation of the French version... Konstantinos (talk) 12:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Konstantinos (talk) 09:09, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation
Talk:742617000027 (Slipknot song)

message: Is it Charles Mansons voice in the sound sample, or is it just someone else who talks in the documentary? --Easyas12c 12:26, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charles Manson 

message: Do you really think this song is some sort of rock or metal? I'd be very confused trying to find a genre for it, but it is definitely not rock or metal. --Easyas12c 11:10, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  genre
Talk:Collapse

message: This should be a dismbiguation page, listing many more forms of collapse. --Lindosland 12:32, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: ok but stil  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.227.85.105 (talk) 20:11, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This should be a dismbiguation page 

message:  - Where is that? --Ludvikus (talk) 16:43, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collapsetop
Talk:Potidaea

message: The article appears a bit stubby. There is much in Thucydides that could be added. Alcmaeonid 21:24, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Was Potidaea in Thrace? None of the maps in article Thrace show it extending this far West. Bards (talk) 11:16, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thrace?
Talk:Guilherme Tâmega

message: I've removed the POV edits and commentary from this article in order to obtain a neutral point of view. The timeline originally found on the page is listed below. The info can be used to add substance to the article (in prose form) as long as the info is worded neutrally and is backed up by reliable sources. Happy editing! --Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 21:01, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: POV edits
Talk:Philippines at the 2005 SEA Games

message: Is the Fillipino contingent officially refered to as "Team Philippines" as reflected in this article, or is it just a informal copy from "Team Singapore" ?--Huaiwei 13:10, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a common informal usage from what I see ("Go Team Philippines", "Official Sponsor of Team Philippines"), but I haven't seen any official documentation. 203.167.75.51 20:46, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Before Team Singapore and Team Philippines, there was Team USA. --Howard the Duck 12:23, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Team Philippines?
Talk:Rose's lime juice

message: We sat in a corner of the bar at Victor's and drank gimlets.  "They don't know how to made them here." he said.  "What they call a gimlet is just some lime or lemon juice and gin with a dash of sugar and bitters.  A real gimlet is half gin and half Rose's Lime Juice and nothing else.  It beats martinis hollow." 
By Raymond Chandler "The Long Goodbye" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.227.27.139 (talk • contribs) 08:15, 5 December 2005
Does anybody know how long this stuff keeps? I think listing the product's shelf life would be a good addition to the article, because I'm pretty sure that this product was invented in order to preserve the shelf life of lime juice on sea voyages. The sugar is a preservative. I notice that the bottle says nothing about shelf life. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.107.251.57 (talk • contribs) 21:12, 11 June 2006 
Shelf life of Rose's Lime Juice varies from a few weeks to a few months depending on storage conditions. Heat and sunlight are greatly detrimental to the freshness of the product. Rose's Lime should be a golden yellow color, not green. The photo in the article is not representative of actual product. If stored over 90 degrees Fahrenheit It will brown and develop off flavors within two weeks. I remember Rose's Lime Juice contained alcohol as a preservative until the early 1990's. The ABV was 10%. After that point the alcohol was removed and artificial preservatives were added. I wish I had an old bottle or a photograph for the article. If anyone has one would you post a pic?Myongpark (talk) 17:31, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old discussions 

message: The article needs a photo! Badagnani 01:01, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Should some mention be made that the US version (at least) contains that nasty High Fructose Corn Syrup rather than proper sugar? --Stephend01 (talk) 04:22, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it made with sugar still elsewhere? --jpgordon::==( o ) 05:04, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

text: Yes - the UK version is still made with sugar --Stephend01 (talk) 12:56, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  High Fructose Corn Syrup 

message: The History section states that Lauchlan Rose lived 1829-1885. But it also says “In 1893, Rose purchased plantations there to ensure his supply.”
This does not make sense. Maybe the company purchased plantations, but Rose himself could certainly not have done it if he died in 1885. Or is the year 1893 wrong? Ango74 (talk) 22:21, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  History errors? 

message: As you can see from the bottle, it's called Rose's Lime Juice Cordial. It is not a bottle of lime juice. 80.189.152.211 (talk) 22:48, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Category talk:Data types

message: How could we define what belongs in Data types and what in Type theory? One way would be to have anything related to types in Type theory, and then move some articles into its subcategories, such as Data types.
My problem with the current state is that some topics of types are hidden in the subcategory Type theory while they can be largely practical topics that Type theory happens to discuss.
To skip the issue of the relation between practise and theory, what about naming the supercategory Type systems or Typing or so? --TuukkaH 13:26, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subcategorization
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Changes since I last edited

message: This does not work for me, the link goes to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=pagename&action=history&gotosince=true , which gives the diff of the last edit of the page.--Patrick 13:32, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Same, I wonder why?, can someone fix this???? Brian | (Talk) 08:52, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

text: It used to show the difference between the current revision of a page and the last revision which was written by the user. For instance, the last revision of Takfiri edited by me (at the time I'm writing this) is 101299285, so if I press the tab on Takfiri, I get http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Takfiri&diff=101933933&oldid=101299285 (if the script were working correctly). -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 11:12, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled section

message: This is awesome. Is there a way to implement a similar link in the watchlist (next to the "hist" and "diff" links)? Jobjörn (talk) 13:39, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Watchlist 

message: It looks like there's an encoding bug in this script. Clicking "Since" on a page like Hot, Cool & Vicious tries to return the history for Hot, Cool instead, with the "& Vicious" being sent verbatim and therefore interpreted as a parameter. —RobinHood70 (talk • contribs) 23:28, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encoding Bug 

message: The main point of this edit is to update getElementsByClassName per ResourceLoader/Legacy JavaScript. I also ran the code through a Javascript beautifier to make the formatting consistent. – Robin Hood  (talk) 16:33, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update