lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ed Birchall

message: I just entered this article to start making links and citations, which I will do in the next several hours.  Trust me, this person is notable, known and beloved to generations of Oklahoma residents.  He knew everybody in town, and anyone who grew up there in the 50s through 80s met him.  His story shows a slice of public life and entertainment that is long gone, the homegrown entertainer.  There are plenty of reliable references for him too....I'll add them shortly.  Wikidemo 02:08, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is still in need of reliable sources.  Narthring (talk  • contribs) 18:50, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability / citations, etc
Talk:Janet Lane-Claypon

message: This is a fascinating article but some of the material is plagiarized.  For example, this entire paragraph is taken verbatim from the Breast Cancer Action newsletter, without attribution:  "Woven through all of these reports are Lane-Claypon’s scrupulous and prescient concerns about the drawbacks and uncertainties that her own methodology exposed. Sidebar discussions reveal an extraordinarily rigorous and subtle intelligence at work. In the end-results study just mentioned, Lane-Claypon acknowledges the difficulties involved in deriving an accurate staging of the disease (in the days before routine diagnostic biopsies). She understood that differences in access to health care (and hence to surgical treatment) would influence survival results. She recognized the problems of bias created by limiting the study to survivors and by relying on the recall of breast cancer patients themselves rather than observing (with greater neutrality and potentially greater accuracy) the experience of newly diagnosed women going through treatment and beyond. Finally, in reviewing the family histories of her cases, she anticipated the role that genes might play in the development of breast cancer. 'There appear to be some families,' she wrote, 'in which for reasons not certain at present, cancer plays havoc with the members, and there is (some) slight evidence in some instances that it attacks the same organs.'"
Sbartell 02:20, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The plagiarised text was apparently added in 2006, with this diff. I am willing to take a run at paraphrasing content from the original source, but have limited time until about August 5. I would welcome the help of other editors on this article about a very worthy and notable woman. Cheers! — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 19:59, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dealing with copyvio
Talk:Stan Hovdebo

message: Hi!
I wanted to invite you to join the new WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada. The goal is simple: to create and maintain high quality articles on Wikipedia related to Canadian politicians and Canadian political parties. Come on over and check us out at WP:PPAP. SriMesh | talk 02:27, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New Wikiproject!
Talk:Core router

message: I am not sure why core router companies are listed on this page.  Considering removing the fail list at least.  Comments? --akc9000 (talk • contribs • &site=  count) 02:34, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it's relevant and useful. The list of failed companies illustrates how tough the core router market is (much like the supercomputer market) and points to some pretty interesting designs like Caspian's Apeiro flow based router. Adamantios 13:35, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

text: The term "core router" arose in the dot.bomb era. This article was initially intended to capture the history of this era. The list of failed companies was intended as an objective way to capture the history. I worked for two of the failed companies. -Arch dude 14:18, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok, I am fine with this then.  Would you please help me with the term: Core. I know exaclty what you are talking about here.  However another editor has added the term Core to the Router article, describing as it would in ref. to the ISP AS.  To avoid a problem here I thought it best to create a disambiguation page, and listed it on the top of the article. Would you please confirm you agree with this.  Thanks!  --akc9000 (talk • contribs • &site=  count) 04:40, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think your solution is perfectly acceptable. It is not what I would have done, but it works quite well. I appreciate your question, as it shows that you are looking for consensus. Please continue to be bold and fix problems when you see them. -Arch dude 13:27, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

message: 217.23.233.124 (talk) 11:49, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: "support multiple telecommunications interfaces"
Could someone plaese explain what that means? Wikipedia should be readable also for non-techies. 
Is "telecommunications interface" a generic term / superordinate concept that includes IP?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.174.209.241 (talk) 13:38, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation for beginners
Talk:Alex Tremulis

message: Moved the following comment by 24.6.120.3 from the article:
:The Cord 812 so-called "coffin nosed" Cord was a seminal design and a sensation at the time but the design is usually credited to Gordon Buehrig then chief designer at Auburn Cord Dusenberg perhaps Tremulis did work on th design under Buehrig's supervision?)
for further discussion here. However, nothing in the article credits Tremulis as the designer of the Cord 812. A reference states: "Among the projects that he worked on were the classic Cord 810 and 812 series and a custom Duesenberg roadster with a removable hard-top. Tremulis was named the Chief Stylist in 1936 and remained in that role until the company failed in 1937." (See here) Thanks! CZmarlin (talk) 19:16, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cord 812 design credit
Talk:The Tragedy of Mariam

message: Describing Mariam as having an "essential integrity" is an interpretation that needs a citation. This assessment of the play results from the interpretive stance that Mariam will not use deception to her advantage, even when she is faced with death. This is only ONE interpretation. One can find all the characters in the play using deception, even Mariam, and Salome has the most rational arguments for equality, while Mariam is blatantly racist and antagonistic toward her mother. Also, most scholars who examine the play are feminists, and it would be fair most would be opposed to using the word "essentialism," since this is a hot-button term used within feminist theory. --Malecasta (talk) 04:41, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Note
Talk:Pegasus (disambiguation)

message: The Pegasus Rocket is sectioned under "Astronomy".
The thing is, it's a missile, what the heck does that have to do with "Astronomy"??
69.159.218.210 02:45, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Renamed the section to "Astronomy and Aerospace." =David(talk)(contribs) 16:29, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

text: We don't have an article by that name on Wikipedia.  Put up a request on the requested articles page, and maybe someone with enough information will write one. =David(talk)(contribs) 16:29, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I seem to remember a movie, I think titled Pegasus. It's very old and although I can't remember much of it, I do remember a winged horse in it, completly white and I remember him being surrounded, at one point, but many woman who adored him. Does anyone else remember this so it can be added?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.92.32.195 (talk) 01:05, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie?
Talk:Parampara

message: In my view looking at the completeness of the article :Guru-shishya_tradition and the close similarity it would be justified to merge this article there. Normally "Parampara" would be the word I would use If I were to say Guru-shishya_tradition in one word. Placing it there would help editors as well and avoid duplication of data--it will rather help the editor. --Jyoti (talk) 15:49, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see no reason why it should not be merged and can't make sense of AroundTheGlobe's point. 
Vaisnavi (talk) 02:49, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Neiother do I. I've merged this article to :Guru-shishya_tradition, for obvious reasons. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:52, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this article be merged with [[Guru-shishya_tradition]]?
Talk:Medical school in Canada

message: Hello all,
Moved the info over from the Canada section of "Medical School" to create Canada's own page.  A few issues:  I'm wondering if the section on dialect at the bottom and some of the discussion of differences between residencies here and in the States is of interest.
I'm tempted to put in an exhaustive table of direct-entry residencies available through CaRMS to Canadian grads, that would also show subspecialty fellowships possible after completion of the residencies.  Wouldn't be of much interest to med students / docs, but might interest the general public to see how subspecialized medicine has become in Canada.
I think the article would benefit from some NPOV discussion of the steps faced by FMGs in obtaining residencies/licenses/jobs here.  This will no doubt be a challenge.  Would also be interesting to discuss obstacles faced by Canadian grads getting licenses elsewhere (e.g., Florida). Dannywp 02:53, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: i want to know about cannada pre medical test  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.178.79 (talk) 09:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  want to know about canada pmt 

message: I would like to know the requirements for Canadian medical evaluation for a person newly graduated from faculty of medicine ( 5years ) and not yet finished with internship. (I finish after 6 months in medicine)
and surgery  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.252.17.28 (talk) 11:55, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information request 

message: Under Medical Education Systems[], the articles for Australia, The United States, The United Kingdom, Hong Kong, the Philippines, South Africa use the format for urls:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_education_in_*country*  
The exceptions to this format are India (which is linked through http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_College_%28India%29), and Canada.
24.113.65.11 (talk) 05:45, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revising the title 
Talk:Chesapeake Bay deadrise

message: Need updating.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.57.227.153 (talk) 22:45, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  links 
Talk:Coastal minehunter

message: Merge to minehunter
This seems like a subheading on the minehunter page more than the need of a entire page for itself.Llammakey (talk) 19:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

text: Agree - one article.  Probably not even a subheading as most vessels covered in minehunter are coastal. Davidships (talk) 05:00, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

text: Agree. Alansplodge (talk) 13:28, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok. Left the discussion open for the week. Everyone agrees that there is no point to a separate page. I will merge with the main minehunter page. Llammakey (talk) 13:37, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to minehunter
Talk:Coxless pair

message: I admire the restraint I exercised by not making any number of possible jokes by vandalizing this page. 24.16.15.115 (talk) 03:25, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: FUNNY
Talk:Question of law

message: I propose that this page be merged with Question of fact as there is a significant overlap in the content of the two pages as of right now, and the understanding of one requires the overall context of both. 
Along those lines, Trier of fact seems to be more or less the same topic as Question of fact just from a different viewpoint, so I'd also propose merging all 3 together. 2601:6:1B00:607:4D56:1A3B:BE11:22D1 (talk) 20:41, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with "Question of fact" and "Trier of fact" 

message: I really see only ONE example question, and the point of the example is that it's unclear whether it is a question of law or of fact. It's contained in the first block quotation, the question is the following statement (whether it is true): "On November 9, the defendant while driving his car negligently ran over the plaintiff at the intersection of State Street and Chestnut Street." That's posed as possibly fact or possibly law. I suspect that removing the word "negligently" might convert it into a pure question of fact. But I'm not sure, perhaps only the definition of negligence is a question of law.
Examples of each kind of question that are considered clear cut, rather than one example that is chosen to be ambiguous, would be good. 209.6.225.254 (talk) 20:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone add examples please?
Talk:Dartmouth Higher Ferry

message: Sooooo, how exactly does a horse powered ferry work? 77.101.41.121 (talk) 09:38, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Horse powered Ferry?
Talk:Depot ship

message: This article needs to either be expanded to include more recent ships, or have its title changed to "Depot Ships of World War II."  71.233.90.196 (talk) 21:45, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't disagree with the concept of expanding the time frame if use of the type truly extends over a broader time frame. The problem is sources. Auxiliary ships have never generated as much public interest as the warships which capture the headlines. And the second world war was the last time we had naval combat of sufficient duration to inspire a major warship construction program. While depot ships have been described in the compilations of second world war naval vessels, the participants of subsequent naval conflicts are not so comprehensively documented. For the changed infrastructure reasons described above, I suspect the depot ship concept is obsolete; but I have yet to find a source with sufficient interest in the type to make that assessment. Can someone suggest sources to either confirm or deny my conclusion? Thewellman (talk) 17:12, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  WW II only?
Talk:The Picture (Massinger play)

message: 'In 1835 Alfred de Musset produced his own adaptation, Barberine.'
Musset's source was Matteo Bandello, cf. Léon Lafoscade, LE THÉATRE D'ALFRED DE MUSSET (149-157). --BalfiClassic (talk) 14:27, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alfred de Musset
Talk:Farr 40

message: This is not a ship. I do not think it should be in the Ships WikiProject Minnesota1 00:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the ship project tag. Recent discussions have determined that recreational craft under 100' in length are not in scope. --Brad (talk) 20:30, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Within the scope of WP:Ships?

message: what, did someone just copy and paste a press release into here? Transmarginal (talk) 17:57, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like it. I purged a lot of the unencyclopedic content, but it still needs a good deal of work before its up to snuff. Parsecboy (talk) 18:12, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  written like an ad
Talk:The Memorable Masque of the Middle Temple and Lincoln's Inn

message: I haven't added it in yet, but I believe the article should cite the original account of the masque itself, which exists as a digital (fully typographic) transcription at the University of Michigan. When I get a chance I will add this source to the citations of this article and perhaps include an external link. JackKausch (talk) 17:09, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Citing Primary Sources
Talk:Gambling ship

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-mile_limit
71.80.203.159 (talk) 04:29, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link 

message: Broichmore (talk) 12:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Jack Heath's floating gambling house on the Potomac, 1911
Talk:Blas Cabrera

message: Appears to be a rough and incomplete translation of the article from Spanish Wikipedia; Last major work on the translation was made in April 2007, at which time more than half the article was still in Spanish. Here is what Google made of the Spanish article (in some places better (;-> than our current content, even where the translation has been attempted). Andrewa 03:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:The Masque of Blackness

message: I think that it might be helpful to add some historical context to the lead. For example including the significance of women being able to participate in this production.
Fpaladino (talk) 00:00, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

message: You may want to review the removal of referenced text by Special:Contributions/31.205.38.57.
--Error (talk) 18:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unexplained changes
Talk:French submarine Gymnote (Q1)

message: The Gymote was impressive for being ALL-electric, but otherwise its the Holland, not the Gymote, which is the "first modern submarine --Beomoose (talk) 17:35, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Besides which, the Isaac Peral was launched first, so Gymnote was not the first all electric either. Rees11 (talk) 00:34, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gymote is Impressive, but not a big "first"
Talk:H-boat

message: This is not a ship. I do not think it should be in the Ships WikiProject Minnesota1 00:08, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct WikiProject 
Talk:Hampton Ferry (River Avon)

message: Now that the link to the restaurant/boat hire/hotel/caravan park has been removed leaving  no other references of note, is there anything really  notable about this small chain ferry, of which there are thousands dotted around England? Even with  the same name:
http://www.visitrichmond.co.uk/travel-river.asp. --Kudpung (talk) 13:44, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Italian submarine Galileo Galilei

message: :HM Submarine X2 → HMS X2 — — Strong consensus use for Royal Navy submarines is to use "HMS" rather than "HM Submarine"; 500+ RN submarine articles use "HMS" — Bellhalla (talk) 12:52, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure why this got moved from uncontroversial moves. The proposed name matches WP:NC-SHIPS guidelines and was just a move over a redirect with history… — Bellhalla (talk) 05:01, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: . Jafeluv (talk) 13:41, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 

message: I'm unclear why Italian submarine Galileo Galilei redirects to HMS X2 if it is more notable and had longer career under the original name than under the captured one. Can this be amended please? Thanks & Regards, DPdH (talk) 02:55, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why moved from original name? 

message: I just performed the move request above, but the page previously at this title (Italian submarine Galileo Galilei) had a nontrivial history, due to a previous merge between it and the HMS X2 article. I therefore performed the move as a "round robin", in order to leave the previous edit history intact for attribution purposes. It can now be found at , which redirects here. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 10:02, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit history preserved at HMS X2 

message: The footnotes make repeated reference to a source by "Giorgerini", but the relevant source does not appear in the bibliography. Can someone possessing the missing information correct this oversight?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.115.43.240 (talk) 14:34, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Reference
Talk:HMS Defender (D114)

message: A non-free use rationale has been included on the image page for this article; all is now appropriate for the use of this image. Shem (talk) 13:55, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem resolved
Talk:Domremy, Saskatchewan

message: SriMesh | talk 03:13, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:HMS Delight (D119)

message: Sadly not the case. HMS Contest, laid down in November 1943 was the Royal Navy's first all-welded warship, following successful construction experience with HMS Cavalier and her sister ship. HMS Delight was not laid down till 1946. The confusion comes from the intention that the entire Darings' be the Royal Navy's first all-welded warship class, which for various reasons did not happen with Daring, Decoy, and Diana of hybrid construction. What the Daring class did become was the first all-welded ships to be constructed in Australia. Mingebinge2 (talk) 02:17, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Royal Navy's first all-welded warship
Talk:HMS E8

message: Luftwaffe MajorGeneral HB Ramcke, who served in WWI as an enlisted sailor aboard Prinz Adalbert prior to transfering to the Marine Infantry in Flanders, recalls on page 58 of his autobiography "From Ships Boy to Paratrooper General" that he was informed at the front in Belgium by written comunication of the loss of the Prinz Adalbert with the entire crew to a torpedo from E6. This would seem to be in conflict.--Rwberndt (talk) 02:35, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prinz Adalbert - conflicting reference 
Talk:HMS Falmouth (F113)

message: A couple of things to update on the Armament and history. 
I served in Falmouth between July 82 and January 83. In that time, following a work up at Portland, we crossed the Atlantic to serve as Belize Guard Ship. Several visits to Belize sandwiched around visits to Vera Cruz, Mexico, Houston, Texas, St Peterburg, Florida, and the islands of Dominica, Tortola, Martinique, Barbados and Grand Caymen returning to Portsmouth December 82.
The 40mm gun had been replaced by a single Seacat Sponson (4 missiles) and one of the Limbo Mortars sets was removed, I believe, to make way for the flight deck and Wasp helicopter. 2A00:23C7:5D4C:4D01:9C8E:9A11:8E83:D518 (talk) 09:09, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Falmouth 1982
Talk:The Knight of Malta

message: The capital of Malta, Valletta, is often misspelled "Valetta". Should the name of the character in this play also have two l's?  (I realise that spelling wasn't standardized when the play was written so it's perfectly possible that one l is correct.) Dricherby (talk) 12:06, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Talk:HMS Inverness (M102)

message: Hi guys!
In the Estonian Mineships Division, of four ships, all of them show a "Badge" or Ship's shield, except for this one.
According to the written information, there is a shield for this ship, and there is a lengthy description of same!
Maybe someone out there from the ship or the Estonian Navy can come up with the image of the shield and put it into the "info" header under "badge", just like with the other ships?
All the best,
James
203.150.155.126 (talk) 04:31, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  No ship's Shield or Badge shown
Talk:Garage punk (fusion genre)

message: Garage punk is defined as a fusion genre throughout this page. However, the sources don't refer to it as being a "fusion"- AllMusic doesn't, The Guardian doesn't, MTV doesn't- it's simply described as a genre of punk and rock. And this makes sense to me. Glam punk and progressive metal aren't described as a "fusion genre" despite their similar history as developing out of rock genres first. Fusion implies that very much separate entities came together to form a new one, but garage rock has always teetered on the line between rock and punk, that garage punk emerging as a genre just seems likes an unsurprising, natural development.
Anyone agree/disagree?
128.54.139.29 (talk) 17:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fusion Genre
Talk:HMS Jaguar (F37)

message: Defence blogs suggest severe leaks curtailed the Jaguars trip to the third cod war and she returned to the UK  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.37.64.48 (talk) 03:29, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did HMS Jaguar complete voyage to Iceland 1976 

message: The references to main armament are completely wrong.  She had twin 4.5 turrets from build. Did she ever have depth charge projectors? The Radar outfit in the side table also seems to be either wrong or a description of the fit once transferred to Bangladesh?  I will try and find an authoritative source and correct.  Jim Whitaker (talk) 13:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armament