lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Antarctic Ice Marathon & 100k ultra race

message: The external links removed from the Antarctic Ice Marathon were not relevant to the Antarctic Ice Marathon. They concerned a completely different marathon on King George Island called the Antarctica Marathon.Polarruns 01:00, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  external links 

message: ...I've rated it a stub because it simply has four sentences (tables and the continent map don't really count with stub status). With no information as to course (is it the same each year? is it flat?), possible weather disruption (has it ever been rescheduled because of extreme weather?), number of competitors (and limits due to logistics), assistance from antarctic bases (surely medical officers have to be on hand, for instance), record times, etc., I can't really see it currently being more than a stub. Grutness...wha? 05:58, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Before anyone asks...
Talk:Plaza de las Tres Culturas

message: I have just been 'reprimanded' - tongue in cheek - for having added an external link to this site, namely http://www.delange.org/ThreeCultures/ThreeCultures.htm
To quote the wiki external links and guidelines...
They should be kept to a useful minimum, and provide relevant and non-trivial information that isn't present in the page
I have no affiliation with this site, but having visited the real location, I found the wiki site to provide many links to the cultures and the various buildings around the Plaza, but nothing related to the Plaza itself. By my understanding... 'There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia.'
I consider this to be content-relevant, but would appreciate the views of other users.
Regards, A320sean 00:25, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Desmond Tiny

message: Come on people, learn to write. This article looks like it was written by an 8 year old. And Mr. Unsigned, THAT'S the whole freakin' point. The step parents aren't supposed to know, and he meddles so that they actually think they are the biological parents. To go back to my original point, just LOOK  at the article now.
"SPOILERS!!! Mr. Tiny is really steve and darren's dad!"
How idiotic, I ask you, is that? I rest my case. HeeroYuiX 02:19, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encyclopedic Content 

message: This article needs a heck of a lot of work. Honestly, I think an 8-year-old could write better. I've fixed the grammatical and spelling errors in it, but it still doesn't flow as well, and we need some sources. 70.59.196.16 17:24, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited Gramatical Errors
Talk:Ballyragget

message: Recently (Nov 2022), a series of edits were made to change the description of Ballyragget from "small town" to "village". I reverted these changes as uncited and unexplained. But also because the current and former Kilkenny County Council county and local area development plans appear to support the "small town" description. For example, the 2004 Ballyragget Local Area Plan (LAP) uses the term "town" throughout. And, where "village" is used, it is used in the past tense or for juxtaposition. (EG: "Ballyragget was a small village then [early 17th century]", "[Ballyragget's] urban street pattern [is] characteristic of a town rather than a village".) Prior to the 2004 LAP, and as noted on page 1 of the 2004 LAP, the previous planning framework was the 1980s "Draft Study and Action Plan for the Town of Ballyragget". (Emphasis mine.) After gthe 2004 LAP, we have the Kilkenny County Development Plan 2014-2020. This seems to include Ballyragget in the "smaller towns" category (along with Piltown/pop.1,220 and Mooncoin/1,175). And, in hierarchical terms, behind what the council has classified as "district towns" (like Castlecomer/1,500), "large towns" (New Ross/8,000) and "hub" (Kilkenny city/26,500). If someone has sources to support the "reclassification" of Ballyragget (from town to village), then please provide refs to support. ~~ Guliolopez (talk) 03:47, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Village/town
Talk:Vegas Vic

message: I'm surprised there's not a list of appearance of "Vic" in popular media.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.212.189.130 (talk) 02:43, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Surprised

message: Isn't this guy in Fallout: New Vegas? I think he shows up on the screens of security bots  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.246.134.55 (talk) 03:21, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: And it's in the background of dozens of films and television shows. Such appearances of landmarks, and other passing pop culture references, which have no impact on the actual landmark are discouraged as trivial. oknazevad (talk) 02:48, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fallout: New Vegas 

message: Should something be mentioned about Vic Vega in the popular culture section?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.27.134.22 (talk) 10:37, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reservoir Dogs 

message: Not sure if this is relevant, a version of Vegas Vic appearing in the popular video game Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas.
Image proof: http://www.g-unleashed.com/files/16_shoe28a.jpg
Lots42 (talk) 14:21, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas
Talk:List of Long Island Rail Road stations

message: In looking through the unassessed category today, I noticed that the Long Island Rail Road Stations article has a merge tag from May 2009 but no further actions or comments on the merge.  I am merely adding the notice here to complete the suggestion. Slambo (Speak) 15:02, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Support - The articles duplicate each other. Acps110 (talk) 00:45, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

text: Support, although the articles didn't really duplicate each other until after Long Island Rail Road Stations was originally tagged to be merged with this one. User:Tinlinkin and I had a packed discussion on the merger, on how to go about doing it at the time. ----DanTD (talk) 05:10, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

text: Completed I believe I was debating if I was going to include the station count by line. That's the delay. Other than that, I think all useful info from the page has been merged. Tinlinkin (talk) 13:13, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Long Island Rail Road Stations]] 
Talk:Acton (UK Parliament constituency)

message: While it is true that at the February 1974 general election, George Young won the seat for the Conservative Party, defeating the previous Labour MP for Acton Nigel Spearing I am not sure it is appropriate to call this a Conservative gain. The 1974 boundaries were not the same as when Spearing regained the seat for Labour at the 1970 general election and it is difficult to be sure that the Conservatives would not have won the seat in 1970 if the 1974 boundaries had been used. It would be normal to compare the result on new boundaries with the notional, rather than the actual, result for the previous election ,and in a case like this it would be more common not to record the seat as a gain, but simply describe it as a Conservative win. Indeed the only seat that the Times Guide to the House of Commons for the February 1974 election records as a Conservative gain from Labour is Berwick and East Lothian suggesting it considered Acton as notionally Conservative.  It also is worth noting that it categorises Acton as a seat with Major boundary changes. Dunarc (talk) 23:52, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  February 1974 result - was it technically a Conservative gain or a hold? 

message: There should be a divide on 1965 (when the MB was incorporated into the LB Hillingdon). Jackiespeel (talk) 20:28, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Components
Talk:Altrincham and Sale West (UK Parliament constituency)

message: It's not really formerly known as this, is it? It's just that a similar area was covered. In particular "its name was altered as part of the boundary changes for the 1997 general election" is very sloppy.--Lo2u (T • C) 08:29, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formerly  known as Altrincham and Sale 
Talk:Mesozoa

message: How can the general encyclopedic definition of an animal characterise it under the vague definition of "enigmatic"???  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.83.95.88 (talk) 14:31, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enigmatic??? 

message: If Orthonectida and Rhombozoan are not closely related, how about removing the discussion of life cycles to the articles about those constituent phyla?  Most of the details are specific to one group or the other anyway.
Cephal-odd 04:01, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove life cycle? 

message: Why does the article say they used to be classed as a phylum (a ranked clade) but were recently discovered to be monophyletic, and are no longer treated as a clade? This is self-contradictory. Please clarify whether "Mesozoa" are polyphyletic or paraphyletic, as related to Rouphozoa. 2601:441:467F:9E00:D4E:A480:AA82:C438 (talk) 02:12, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monophyletic? 

message: Mesozoan is not the singular of Mesozoa. I will remove it. --kupirijo (talk) 17:09, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mesozoan is not the singular of Mesozoa
Talk:Amber Valley (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Stuart Bent and Kate Smith need sources to back up the fact that they are candidates in the election. Probably genuine, need to get the citations. Will come back ASAP and have a looksie. Senotshtooms (talk) 14:14, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: They're genuine. All you needed to do was check the BBC web site - here's the entry for Amber Valley. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:23, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two candidate names haven't got citations 
Talk:Edinburgh's Telford College

message: The article does not read as an ad - if it did, it would promote the college uncritically. It is a collection of useful, appropriate and as far as I can see, accurate facts and figures, not promoting any particular viewpoint.
86.132.238.244 00:51, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: from 2007

message: let me know about the admission procudure for my graduation and also let the th\ime of admission.,.....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.70.77.114 (talk) 05:56, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  admission 

message: Since Telford no longer exists as an institution, any current information should be moved to the page on Edinburgh College. The article on Telford College should retain only information of historical value relating to the independent institution which operated 1964-2012. I made a brief start but the page needs a thorough overhaul. Thanks, Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 16:39, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated 
Portal talk:Azerbaijan/New article announcements

message: Hi, I am in the trial runs of the User:AlexNewArtBot (see Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/AlexNewArtBot). The bot analyzes the new articles for a day and puts suspected Azeri-related articles into User:AlexNewArtBot/AzeriSearchResult, the articles are suppose to be manually put into the portal page and/or removed if irrelevant.
The list of rules are in User:AlexNewArtBot/Azeri the first pattern between the slashes on each line is the pattern that should be present in the article to trigger the rule (note the case insensitive match. The other patterns on the same line are suppose to inhibit the rule. E.g. for the Russian board /florida/ inhibits /petersburg/ rule as the article is most probably about the American city. If you are reasonably familiar with the regular expressions and know what you are doing, you can edit the rules straight away, but better ask me. In the Russian board I had to remove some rules: e.g. there are a lot of non-Russians named Vladimir and Chita, so I had to remove the names of the cities or have to much false positive. If you are interested why an article went to the list there is log on the User:AlexNewArtBot/AzeriLog explaining the rule that sent an article to the searchresults (if the log  is cleared try to look into the history of the log).
That is all. Any suggestions are welcome.Alex Bakharev 00:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:AlexNewArtBot]] - New Article Bot 

message: I moved the comment by Pocopocopocopoco to Portal:Azerbaijan/Azerbaijan-related Wikipedia notice board, as it apparently was intended to be placed there. --Grandmaster 10:10, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment move
Talk:Arundel (UK Parliament constituency)

message: The page says that he was MP from November 1622.  But
List of Parliaments of England says that that king's 3rd parliament was dissolved on 8 February 1622 and his fourth parliament did not meet until 12 February 1624.
Alekksandr (talk) 13:15, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sir Richard Weston
Talk:List of Roseanne episodes

message: I noticed that "Terms of Estrangement", "All About Rosey" and "Into that Goodnight", have all been changed so that they only represent one episode, instead of the double episodes they actually are and has thus altered the overall number of episodes which should be 222 episodes, not 219. I believe the double episodes should be divided into two separate episodes, anyone else agree with me? Babelcolour5 (talk) 12:05, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  219 Episodes 

message: Would it be alright if I added a note under the season 8 episode "Halloween: the Final Chapter" that Sarah Chalke had a cameo in the episode as an unnamed trick-or-treater? And can I also note (even though there's no confirmation on this) that it is totally plausible this unnamed character could actually be Andrea from season 10, in which Sarah Chalke also portrays? Jeanlovecomputers (talk) 07:57, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sarah Chalke in Season 8 

message: It would be appropriate to add The Conners here as it is a direct continuation of Roseanne and a substitute for the eleventh season. The overview could be done in a Hogan Family style. 24.114.70.18 (talk) 18:09, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a completely different series so it has no business on this list. - Brojam (talk) 16:15, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Conners
Portal talk:Georgia (country)/New article announcement

message: Hi, I am in the trial runs of the User:AlexNewArtBot (see Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/AlexNewArtBot). The bot analyzes the new articles for a day and puts suspected Georgia-related articles into User:AlexNewArtBot/GeorgiaSearchResult, the articles are suppose to be manually put into the portal page and/or removed if irrelevant.
The list of rules are in User:AlexNewArtBot/Georgia the first pattern between the slashes on each line is the pattern that should be present in the article to trigger the rule (note the case insensitive match. The other patterns on the same line are suppose to inhibit the rule. E.g. for the Russian board /florida/ inhibits /petersburg/ rule as the article is most probably about the American city. If you are reasonably familiar with the regular expressions and know what you are doing, you can edit the rules straight away, but better ask me. In the Russian board I had to remove some rules: e.g. there are a lot of non-Russians named Vladimir and Chita, so I had to remove the names of the cities or have to much false positive. If you are interested why an article went to the list there is log on the User:AlexNewArtBot/GeorgiaLog explaining the rule that sent an article to the searchresults (if the log  is cleared try to look into the history of the log).
That is all. Any suggestions are welcome. I am having troubles so far finding rules that will reliably seaparate Georgia (country) from Georgia (USA state). I expect to fix them in a couple of days Alex Bakharev 00:57, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:AlexNewArtBot]] - New Article Bot
Talk:Ashfield (UK Parliament constituency)

message: It says it was a hold for Labour but it seems to be a gain for Labour over Conservative, and the swings also seem to be wrong, as Labour got a higher percent and Conservative a lower percent than the previous election. Jackrabbit742 (talk) 23:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  1979 Election seems wrong?
Talk:Cops in shops

message: There seems to be no reason for a separate article on campaign that will probably not significantly expand beyond what's described here. The Century Council article contains similar information and references. This article was created as part of an article marathon by a now banned editor to create links to his webpage; some of the articles were notable; this one does not appear to be. Flowanda | Talk 20:32, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge into [[The Century Council]]
Talk:Recoil (band)

message: copyvio on last edits. contents from mute.com:  musicnonstop.co.uk  and shout.ru:,
218.227.198.48 15:04, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert

message: Please balance the article. 3 albums are in 1 paragraph and 1 album in many paragraphs. Get the Balance Right! Nadsenec2 (talk) 16:40, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balance, please 

message: :There were nine entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion. 
*ELpoints #3) states: 
*LINKFARM states: 
*ELMIN: .
*ELBURDEN: Please note:   --  Otr500 (talk) 16:50, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:What Men Live By (opera)

message: If this is the the opera based on the story, shouldn't the story article be named "What Men Live By" and the opera article be named "What Men Live By (opera)"?  Asmeurer (talk  ♬  contribs) 01:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Yes I believe you are correct and it will make an uncontroversial move so I might as well rename them with the according titles mentioned above.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 15:52, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  naming
Talk:Cats Laughing

message: I've been trying to find some reviews of the band and its albums, but everything I've found is in old magazines that aren't available online.  Here's what I know about so far:
* Eric Selbin, "Mixed media: Music", Utne Reader, Jul/Aug91, p136-137.  Reviews Another Way to Travel, apparently favorably.
* Locus Magazine, Apr. 91, reviews Another Way.
* fRoots reviews Cats Laughing in issue 73 and Another Way in issue 99, not sure of the dates.
If anyone has access to any of these and can use them to flesh out the article, that would be great. —Celithemis 01:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Exterminator 17

message: The year is wrong. Or, at least, misleading. Exterminateur 17 was first published in black/white on Métal Hurlant sometime in or before 1977. The most reliable publication date I have is that of the earliest Italian translation I know of: as "Sterminatore 17" on l'almanacco 1978, supplement to Alter Alter #1, 1978, © 1978 Milano Libri Edizioni --213.155.214.186 01:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Exterminator 17 (the English translation) appears in Heavy Metal (American edition of Métal Hurlant) in October 1978, vol. 2, no. 6, p.09-22. See here (unofficial source). --213.155.214.186 01:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sourced the origins as best I could. MURGH disc. 03:41, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Header
Talk:Walburga, Lady Paget

message: Per the article, Lady Paget was her *married* name, unless she married a man with the same last name. Some research should be done to determine what her maiden name was... -- Tanthalas39 (talk) 20:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. PeterSymonds | talk 10:47, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network (Canadian TV channel)

message: Hey,I've been wondering.. Why did anyone removed shows I've added? The shows I have included have been confirmed to have aired on the channel,and I got the sources from a couple of youtube uploads,thus the links. Are they not enough or something? Plus I got the date for Apollo's Pad,and somehow it got removed. Why? I was just trying to help out the wiki,and all I get is a removal for what I did. Honestly,this isn't fair. 2607:FEA8:CC62:6700:0:0:0:9F1C (talk) 19:21, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why removing shows?
Talk:Albany Middle School

message: Combining this article would be a big mistake.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.6.242.17 (talk) 02:55, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Verifying facts "in person" is called original research and it is strictly forbidden on any Wikipedia article. --132 14:46, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

text: The facts have also been checked against various pages on the district website, newspapers, news websites, and many other sources; however, I did not bother to include the resources when I was adding the information - would someone be willing to research the info and put appropriate references?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.6.241.131 (talk) 04:12, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:University of Illinois Experimental Dairy Farm Historic District

message: Just curious where the lat and long came from, looking at a map and the NRHP nom document, it looks like the current lat long is too far north (). Using USA Photomaps, which uses terraserver and USGS aerial photos, the correct lat and long for the center round barn is:. I'm 99.99% sure on this, but I didn't want to change the number if you had a source. Google maps and Yahoo don't give detail, but Windows live aerial and/or terraserver use the USGS images that show the barns. --Dual Freq 23:49, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, the NRHP form, page 4 says approximately 6 acres not 60. I don't know if its a typo, but looking at the map, 60 acres seems impossible. The grid of streets in that area is 40 acres and the historical district is much smaller than that area. The barns look like they are only about 400 feet apart. I'd say the 6 acres in the NRHP application is correct. --Dual Freq 00:27, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably a typo. My fault, thanks for the fix. IvoShandor 05:51, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I used Google Earth, which didn't have high res imagery for the location. I put the centered it on the road near the historic district, I thought it was the road bounding it. You can change it if you haven't already. IvoShandor 10:42, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lat long