Talk:WJAC-TV

message: There is currently a discussion underway regarding this topic at  cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 21:13, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists of former employees of television stations 

message: The 'Coverage You Can Count on Across the Alleghenies' is the current slogan of WJAC-TV. It is even part of their new tv set. Its included in the news open as well. Look at the 45th picture in this slide, it shows 'Coverage You Can Count On Across the Alleghenies' http://www.wjactv.com/slideshow/news/16855253/detail.html 
The list of slogans should be part of the article. 'Coverage You Can Count On' was a previous slogan used by WJAC, there is no way to source that (as far as I know), but if you have been watching channel 6 for many years, you would know that. The other slogans which are local versions of national ads should be included as well. They were used by WJAC on tv, on their commericals (not ones aired by the network).Tlonca (talk) 00:09, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  This page http://www.wjactv.com/download/2009/1209/21907841.pdf shows the current slogan as well. Tlonca (talk) 00:14, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  This page http://www.wjactv.com/download/2007/0503/13250405.pdf is the same document as the link above, just an older version. Under the logo it says 'Coverage You Can Count On'. Tlonca (talk) 00:17, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of station slogans 

message: I know Johnstown was recently mentioned on a PBS special as one of the towns that had their own Romper Room, with "Miss Patti." Was it WJAC? If so, wouldn't that land under locally produced programs? 162.97.179.160 (talk) 15:57, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romper Room 

message: Is there a reason that the WATM and WWCP logos were added to the page along with the "6.3 (ABC)"?  As far as I can tell there is no 6.3 currently being broadcast, and furthermore, I doubt that WJAC would act as a translator for weaker ABC23. 
Nokorola (talk) 04:26, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WATM/WWCP 

message: An image used in this article, NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:18, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: NonFreeImageRemoved.svg <!--Fair-Use ([[:File:WJAC-former-logo.png]]) File Removed by DASHBot--> Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: :Image:RTN6_logo.jpg |WJAC DT2 logo from the RTN era.
:Image:Wjac_news_open.png |WJAC-TV News open used from 2008-2011.
:Image:WJAC-former-logo.png |WJAC-TV logo 2002-2011.
--Nokorola (talk) 16:15, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Logos

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to a list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. 70.48.216.22 (talk) 00:20, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on WJAC-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130610153751/http://www.sbgi.net:80/site_mgr/temp/COX%20Closing_l951bqjg.shtml to http://www.sbgi.net/site_mgr/temp/COX%20Closing_l951bqjg.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Are all of WJAC’s programming in HD and Closed Captioned? 2601:540:9:F178:7407:892:6D52:C511 (talk) 14:58, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  WJAC’s programming 

message: I seem to recall hearing that in the very beginning of its history WJAC broadcast without a license. Is there any truth to this? (If so, it would probably be notable for the article.) Or was there a situation similar to this, such as another outfit broadcasting on channel 6 before WJAC switched to that frequency? (Trying to cover all possibilities, lest someone declare that no, WJAC never broadcast unlicensed, while ignoring the fact that something similar did happen.) Is it perhaps something that WJAC would rather not be mentioned? 2601:545:8201:6290:8906:831E:5F5C:2173 (talk) 19:11, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beginning unlicensed?