lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Elvis Is Back!

message: About 1001 albums you must hear
The article says this "The album also is one out of two Elvis albuns from the 1001 Albums You Must Hear Before You Die, it took the 23rd place, presley's other album on the list was "Elvis Presley" which took the 2nd place after Frank Sinatra's "In the Wee Small Hours."
But such book puts the albums in cronologic order, not in best or worse album , so , there is no 2nd or 23nd place , please fix this  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.216.95.107 (talk) 20:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

message: There's been some activity of late on this issue, so I figured it was time to start a thread here. I can't access the Connie Kirchberg book to check that it does actually say the album is rhythm and blues, and "Poore 1998" (which is used to support rock and roll) is not accompanied by full source details. The "pop, rock, blues" that follows those two genres is cited to McCormick's Daily Telegraph article, but what McCormick says is that on Elvis Is Back!, Presley "tackles ballads, blues, rock, pop and gospel". McCormick also writes: "The superior Bobby-Sox pop is enlivened by harmony singing from the Jordanaires and precise, unshowy singing from Elvis, but the LP takes off on burning blues rockers with Presley getting down and dirty …" So, perhaps we could take "pop" from McCormick, but "blues, rock, pop [and gospel]" are in fact only given as styles included on the album – McCormick is not saying that the album is blues, rock, pop (and gospel, which we omit).
I'm afraid this was probably my error, years back, when I didn't realise that on Wikipedia, it's not a case of listing genres/styles that sources say the album covers, but only the genre(s) that sources say the album is. For instance, at Rubber Soul, one source says the album is a "pre-psychedelic era mix of 1960s pop, soul, and folk". As accurate a description as "pop, soul, folk" is, imo, it's not what we use in that article. Similarly, at the Beatles White Album, there's only the (bland) "rock" and "pop", even though that album has a vast array of musical styles. So, here at Elvis at Back!, we can take only "pop" from McCormick. As I say, I'm unable to check Kirchberg and Poore with regard to rhythm & blues and rock 'n' roll. JG66 (talk) 21:40, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox genres
Talk:De Havilland Moth

message: I think Alan Cobham should be mentioned as the first pilot who in 1926 flew a "Moth" from UK to Zürich and back in one day just to show that it was possible. I (Donald Axel) normally do not enter text in articles on subjects which I do not know much about, but this is an exception. I watched a documentary on technological progress in the 1920'ies and Alan Cobham was mentioned as a person who not only made this trip to Zürich but (apparently before Chichester) mapped a flight route from UK to India (and later other parts). There is a wikipedia article about Cobham, but I think there should be a link from one of the Havilland Moth-articles.
--d-axel (talk) 23:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous groundbreaking persons at Havilland airplane factory
Talk:Yanuca Levu

message: Yanuca Levu is not a privately owned island as recorded in your article. it belongs to a tribe in Moturiki known as the Navutivakarua tribe and their is a village in the island called Yanuca. Because there are many Yanuca in Fiji, Yanuca Levu may be best identified as Yanuca, Moturiki. Portion of the tribe that owned Yanuca Levu settled in a village in Moturiki Island called Navuti. Locals of Moturiki have recorded in oral traditions that the same tribe also owned the island of Yanuca Lailai but was disowned by Cakobau who sold the island of Yanuca lailai during the eve of the deed of seccion at Levuka in 1874. The tribe of the Navutivakarua is lead by its leader known to be the Tunimata and their village in Moturiki is lead by the Rokouli202.151.27.100 (talk) 21:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:List of Olympic medalists in curling

message: In  (see also ) the medalists in 2018 mixed doubles competition were changed - following the disqualification of the Russian pair. After this edit there is a footnote added to the new bronze medalists. I suppose the intention was to add explanation related to the disqualification - however at the moment this links to a footnote about 1924 British team. It is possible that I missed something, but looking through a few recent revisions I did not find any text which could be a footnote related to this. --Kompik (talk) 11:04, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Note for 2018 mixed doubles
Talk:David E. Talbert

message: this article is a lie!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.81.56.36 (talk • contribs) 
* Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top.</br> The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:28, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Olympic medalists in fencing (women)

message: ----
I've transferred the new results for 2012 from the indiv and team results  I found on this page down to the totals table at the bottom, and adjusted the sorting where necessary.  I only found the countries that needed updating by considering the total for each country, I didn't always check metal by metal, but I expect it's ok. Strangetruther (talk) 17:56, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Limacinidae

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 14:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Katy Hamman-Stricker Library

message: American Woman's League needs to be a separate article.--Wikipietime (talk) 20:10, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Woman's League 
Talk:List of Olympic medalists in triathlon

message: „The distances were chosen based on the toughest events from each of the sports that constitute triathlon.[4]“ is written in the abstract. I just read the source to understand how this is meant. I do not think that this is right and useful. Especially, as a marathon is probably tougher than a 10k run. In general, without explaining what exactly is meant by tough, I think it should be changed. Also, my understanding of the text in the source is completely different. Hoping2Help (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation of distances
Talk:List of Olympic medalists in shooting

message: The results for 50 m Military Pistol, individual are also added under 50 m Pistol. Please fix. Sports-reference counts them to 50 m Pistol. Actually, I will fix that myself. -- Firefox13 (talk) 07:20, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  double results 

message: How can a muzzle-loaded pistol be used in a rapid fire pistol event?  The listed 1896 event was for muzzle-loaded pistols.  Jeff in CA (talk) 17:00, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muzzle-loaded pistol  = rapid fire?
Template talk:San Diego Padres roster navbox

message: Randy Wolf and Tad Iguchi are wearing #39 and 15, respectively.
Dshibshm (talk) 21:54, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Randy Wolf and Tad Iguchi

message: This team's uniforms are blue background and gold words. So the template should be likewise.Dshibshm (talk) 18:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colors 

message: These are the proper colors.Dshibshm (talk) 20:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing
Talk:Umbraculidae

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Template talk:Miami Marlins roster navbox

message: Cantu is wearing #3, and Castillo is wearing #15.Dshibshm (talk) 21:57, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: MLB.com is usually the best place for the numbers, which still show Castillo and Cantu with no numbers. Also, just because Cantu in all likelihood will be on the 40-man at the end of ST, he isn't now and shouldn't be put on as such. --Rabbethan 10:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cantu and Castillo

message: After all, Jason Wood is not on the 40 either.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dshibshm (talk • contribs) 22:58, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  J Woody 

message: These are the proper colors.Dshibshm (talk) 20:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, no they are not --Rabbethan 21:20, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  edits 

message: Check the site refs I added.Dshibshm (talk) 19:26, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official Signing 

message: Hayden Penn just got called up, and MLB.com says he is wearing #48. What do we do with Brendan Donnelly?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pm0110 (talk • contribs) 00:10, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hayden Penn called up
Talk:Ryk Tulbagh

message: Tildemanana (talk) 15:15, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

message: I propose to move this page to Rijk Tulbagh, as that is the correct Dutch spelling of his name. Compare the Dutch-language article. The spelling Ryk reflects Afrikaans usage. As far as I can see, this would be a non-controversial move, but I'll leave this here for a few days in case there are arguments I haven't thought of. --Ekaterina Colclough (talk) 10:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Absent any objection for over a week, I have swapped article and redirect. --Ekaterina Colclough (talk) 16:36, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not how you move an article.  That is cutting and pasting the contents of one article into a different one, which loses attribution (ie. makes it look like you wrote the whole thing in one go).  I put it back.  You have now mangled the history of the redirect, so you won't be able to move it yourself and will have to go to WP:RM.  Lithopsian (talk) 17:01, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move
Talk:Trimusculus

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 17:15, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Shipping industry of China

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:39, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:David di Donatello for Best Screenplay

message: # Should this be an article separate from the main David di Donatello article? Are these awards really notable enough to justify a whole group of articles? If so, where are the references to show this?
# Should the title not be "David di Donatello award for Best Screenplay"?
--DanielRigal (talk) 18:59, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Although the articles and the references should be improved for sure, the David di Donatello awards are absolutely notable, since they are the main film awards of Italian cinema, often referred as the "Italian Academy Awards", dating back to the 50s and awarding films and stars also recognized by other international and notable film awards/film festivals. --RedDead720 (talk) 12:42, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

text: I agree on changing the title instead --RedDead720 (talk) 12:43, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two questions
Talk:The Pearce Collections at Navarro College

message: This article was originally created by the museum itself. It attempts to portray the collection as balanced despite educational materials on its website being distinctly biased  wikipedia should not be a place for Confederate Lost Causers to white-wash their attempts at ahistorical scholarship. 
Schnurrfles (talk) 11:34, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balance of article
Talk:Citizen Weather Observer Program

message: From emails from Steve Dimse:
"Findu is end of life. Sometime this week NOAA will begin taking the feed of CWOP stations directly, bypassing findU…. There is only a single findU server at this point and it is very brittle, rebooting itself and dying regularly. I do not have the time or energy's to keep it up.  I will restart it when someone notifies me of a problem …, but at some point something will die beyond repair, and it will go away."
"APRS.fi has the data, and some weather display methods, and the data is available from MADIS though only raw data and not easily." 50.47.151.13 (talk) 18:18, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed re: FindU server services
Talk:Mag Garden

message: I just wondering if anybody knows a history background of Mag Garden. I've been searching all over the Net for it, but no luck.  All I know is that Mag Garden was a company that broke off from Square Enix. So does anybody have some knowledge of their history background? (DarkIceEdge (talk) 10:04, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of Mag Garden? 
Talk:Union of Social Democrats

message: Don't they have a website in English too? --Bfyhuguihyoiu (talk) 22:26, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Lol. Imagine if Gorbachev approached the CPRF with the intention of forming a coalition against United Russia. Just imagine! :D :D :D 118.90.28.56 (talk) 05:14, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I had read news reports that Gorbachev was in the process of founding an 'Independent Democratic' party. Is it know if the Union of Social Democrats will be folded into this proposed new party, or has Gorbachev left/abandoned the Social Democrats? --Autospark (talk) 17:40, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship with Independent Democratic Party 

message: If someone has reliable sources on the party’s use of the fist and rose emblem, do contribute to Fist and rose#Russia. Keriluamox (talk) 10:56, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fist and rose
Talk:Surface weather observation

message: WP:Good article usage is a survey of the language and style of Wikipedia editors in articles being reviewed for Good article nomination.  It will help make the experience of writing Good Articles as non-threatening and satisfying as possible if all the participating editors would take a moment to answer a few questions for us, in this section please.  Would you like any additional feedback on the writing style in this article?  If you write a lot outside of Wikipedia, what kind of writing do you do?  Is your writing style influenced by any particular WikiProject or other group on Wikipedia?  At any point during this review, let us know if we recommend any edits, including markup, punctuation and language, that you feel don't fit with your writing style.  Thanks for your time. - Dan Dank55 (talk) 15:54, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survey 
Talk:Japanese language education in Vietnam

message: Phan Boi Chau's Dong Du (Go East) Movement during the early 20th century, while not successful, was historically significant. DHN (talk) 01:41, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dong Du movement 
Talk:Kōdō

message: This article related to art or architecture in Japan is a stub.....  not a tea?? --Amrum (talk) 22:39, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What mean :   

message: Is there such a genre called Scroll Arrangement?? Tksb (talk) 05:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classical Arts 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Dana boomer (talk) 22:27, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Snoop Dogg's Father Hood

message: sup snoop  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.28.197 (talk) 16:44, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  sup sup 

message: Are there going to be more episodes of this Show (a second season) ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.166.42.32 (talk) 04:24, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Episodes 

message: Where TF is season two?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.180.120.167 (talk) 08:34, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mo Seasonz
Talk:Rother FM

message: Feel free to try it at AFD if you feel strongly about it, but a duly licensed radio station that broadcasts over the air is not a CSD candidate. Bearcat (talk) 22:48, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Talk:GS&WR Class 201

message: Several locomotive articles which relate only to the Republic of Ireland have had the category "Rail transport in Northern Ireland" added.  Is this standard or is it a mistake or is it a political statement?  Biscuittin (talk) 22:48, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've realised this probably needs a bit of work to ease confusion.  I've not doing it immediately now but I'll try to sort the issues as best I can .... I might over edit this explanation to improve it or correct mistakes.
# In 1876 there were built Nos. 201 202; two 0-6-4BT.  These were notable as the first 0-6-4s in the UK.  I've seen them quoted as not a good design
# In 1879 there following Nos. 0-6-4T Nos. 203-206 (Class 203).  There were broadly similar but had only side tankss.
# In 1887 there were 4 0-6-0Ts introduced by Ivatt (Nos. 207-210); followed by Nos. 201 & 202 in 1897 (The existing 201/202 were renumbered); and in 1902 by Nos. 217-220. These ten became GSR Class 201/J11.
# In 1897 The original No. 201/2 became Jumbo and Negro.  Jumbo was rebuilt as a 0-6-0T in 1911; Negro was withdrawn as an 0-6-4T in 1981
# No 204 was converted to an 0-6-0T in 1914 becoming GSR  Class 204/J12 though it was dimensionally almost identical to 201/J11
In summary probably needs to break to two articles at some point.
Djm-leighpark (talk) 07:10, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion