Talk:Quatermass and the Pit (film)

message: What is the etymological basis to the professor's name?  Was it completely dreamed up, or are there actually people going around with that name?
If the first part to the name is connected with the Latin deponent verb quatior and the second part to the name equally connected with the Latin verb metior (past participle messum), is it possible his name means "shake a ruler" or is that nothing more than a coincidence?  If the Latin senses are wanting, could it actually be a cute reference to "Shakespeare Rules" (in a bastardized Latin sort of way)?
:Kneale got it out of a London telephone directory. If I remember the interview correctly, according to Kneale the man was a greengrocer in the East End. Angmering 20:32, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help on the Name's Etymology 

message: The story of finding the name in a telephone directory may well be true. There used to be a TV series "Town and Around" hosted by Cliff Michelmore who interviewed on the programme the only Quatermass listed in the telephone directory. The guest reckoned that he kept getting people phoning him and asking how the plot was going to end.AT Kunene (talk) 20:30, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  original Quatermass 

message: Do we really need a plot summary in the lede, when there is a plot summary section already?  Can't that paragraph come out?  I don't think it really contributes anything more to the article than the plot section does, and it certainly doesn't belong in the lede. 12.233.147.42 (talk) 00:49, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy? 

message: Why is Dr. Matthew Roney  listed as a Palaeontologist?  He seems to me to be more of an physical anthropologist/archeaologist/paleoanthropologist. I didn't hear anything that actually identified him other than a professional.64.53.191.77 (talk) 01:57, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Paleontology is the scientific study of life existent prior to, and sometimes including, the start of the Holocene Epoch roughly 11,700 years before present. Anthropology is the study of humans and their societies in the past and present. Archaeology is the study of human activity through the recovery and analysis of material culture. Dr Matthew Roney (James Donald) is called in and deduces that they are the remnants of a group of apemen over five million years old, more ancient than any previous finds. Therefore the term that is used is correct. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 05:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Profession?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Quatermass and the Pit (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101122023904/http://dvdcult.com/rev_Quatermass3.htm to http://www.dvdcult.com/rev_Quatermass3.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:40, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: References no. 32 and 33 cite Martell, but no such author or book is present in the bibliography. I couldn't find out the source for these citations. It can be something by Philip Martell, head of Hammer's music division, but I cannot find anything. Any ideas?  —  Evil scientist42 (talk) 16:36, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing entry in bibliography 

message: What happened to the Martian (demon) models as they don't seem to have ever been shown or mentioned at the any BBC exhibitionAT Kunene 123 (talk) 13:48, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Martians 

message: Why is it that the only extensively quoted two lines of dialogue receive no mention in the article?
Regards RAClarke (talk) 13:42, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Quotations of dialogue aren't forbidden by policy, but they're fairly infrequent in articles on movies, books, etc. Unless the dialogue has been cited in reliable secondary sources as being particularly significant or noteworthy, there's usually no reason to quote it. Deor (talk) 17:02, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What if our planet were doomed ... ?