Talk:Honda Type R

message: I feel that the EK9 article should be merged in, currently the article contains little appropriate info not present on this page.  The technical specs could be merged in if desired, but I don't really feel that they are encyclopedic.  Having a entire page devoted to one trim level of one generation of one model seems a little like overkill to me.  Of course if an encyclopedic article were written about the EK9 it would be appropriate, but as it stands it is little more then a stat sheet.  --Daniel J. Leivick 19:39, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see WP:OWN, there are no private pages.  Currently there is no encyclopedic content not covered on the main Type R page that is on the current EK9 page.  If you want to have a separate page please add actual content and please do not remove the merge tag until others have had a chance to discuss. --Daniel J. Leivick 02:51, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Again please read WP:OWN.  Neither article is yours or mine and do not remove the merge tag again.  Wait for other editors to comment. --Daniel J. Leivick 03:46, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

text: What is informative about it? It contains largely the same info as the Type R page. Also the presence of other encyclopedic pages is not a reason to keep one. --Daniel J. Leivick 19:19, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

text: A page who's only purpose is to store statistics is a violation of WP:NOT specifically not a collection of statistics.  It would be better to link to an off site page that contained the less important stats like bore/stroke and gear ratios. --Daniel J. Leivick 19:48, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: merge with EK9 Type R

message: I was thinking that this might be a good idea in line with BMW M3 or Audi S4.  I would imagine shortening this page to just the lead and linking to the Type R sections for the NSX and Accord as they are much less ubiquitous then the Civic Type R.  I would still support a merge of the EK9 page into the Civic Type R page, but I think this would serve as a good compromise. --Daniel J. Leivick 00:52, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civic Type R main page

message: "Type R" and "Type-R" are both used here-and-there on Wikipedia's Honda articles. Any chance of picking (an official) one and sticking with it?--Charles Gaudette (talk) 20:11, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punctuation? 

message: I mean really...CJ DUB (talk) 04:14, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this page is an appropriate summary of a range of trim levels that share a common heritage.  It is similar to Special Vehicle Team, Audi S and RS models and BMW M. --Leivick (talk) 02:17, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

text: RS and S are just trim levels, no different than Type-R.  BMW M used to be more of its own department, but the current M range is exactly the same as the Type-R ranges in that they are the top of the line trim level, made in the same factory.  If you want to delete this article, WP:AFD is that away. --Leivick (talk) 19:40, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

text: Vote for rapid deletion. I don't see separate pages for Audi and Porsche trim levels (e.g. Carrera 911 S, GT3 RS), but i do for M-motorsport, SVT, and AMG, which are not trim levels but separate enitities. CJ DUB (talk) 23:21, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well Audi S and RS models is a separate page for an two Audi trim levels.  In any case, typing "Vote for rapid deletion" on this page isn't going to get this article deleted.  You will have to use AfD. --Leivick (talk) 23:47, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does this need its own article? 

message: This page is infected by Integra fanboyism. There is a lot of trivial details which don't match the style of the other sections. CJ DUB (talk) 15:15, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whoa