lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Management of pulmonary arterial hypertension

message: Hello, I was wondering whether medicines that are currently undergoing clinical trials for pulmonary hypertension, such as ambrisentan and tadalafil, should be added to this template. --Kyoko 19:14, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Kyoko. I thought of doing so, but couldn't come to a decision; if you check the code, you'll see ambrisentan is in there, just commented out.  contains drugs such as vandetanib which are still in trials; perhaps this template could follow that example?  Fvasconcellos 19:18, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I still don't know. I guess it would be fine. I'll be bold and edit the template. --Kyoko 20:57, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I've added in hidden comments the group statins and the drug simvastatin, which has been tried in both humans and test rats. I'm not aware of any current clinical trial of simvastatin in the US, but I think there's one in England. I didn't want to be too bold and just add it in plain view. --Kyoko 04:08, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice. I wasn't aware of the role of statins, but a quick PubMed search suggests encouraging results in humans and animal models. We should probably wait until more advanced trials are underway before making it visible though—e.g., ambrisentan is in Phase III and already has marketing validation in the EU, simvastatin is still in Phase I–II. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:48, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: P.S.: here's the link to the English trial. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:49, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

message: I've been wondering whether this template should also be placed on the articles mentioned under "Adjunctive therapy". It's on the CCB and diuretics main articles, but not specifically on nifedipine and hydrochlorothiazide. It seems slightly spammy to me to put it on every single drug in the categories, and that wouldn't accurate either. --Kyoko 15:50, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm. Honestly, my first thought is to keep it only on the main class article... Do you think it would be better placed in specific drug articles? I'd prefer to keep the adjunctive therapy section of the template generalized. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 20:00, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I don't think it would be better placed in the specific drug articles, but I wanted a second opinion. I especially wouldn't want the "Adjunctive therapy" section of the template to get too large. Thanks. --Kyoko 21:18, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  use of template on "Adjunctive therapy" articles?
Talk:Johannes Goropius Becanus

message: This article currently notes, "Goropius's work preceded that of William Jones, who discovered the Indo-European language family". This seems to suggest that Goropius influenced Jones, and specifically the description of Indo-European. I don't see any evidence that this is true, though. If there is a connection, spell it out and give a citation. If there isn't, don't suggest that there might be. Cnilep (talk) 06:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. Cnilep (talk) 07:50, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preceded William Jones
Talk:Jimmy Ledgard

message: According to FreeBMD, the birth of three James Ledgard's were registered in England and Wales from January→March 1918 to October→December 1933, i.e. a birth coninciding with a 1947—58 playing career, they are; James Ledgard (mother's maiden name Crowther) birth registered October→Decenber 1919 in Dewsbury district, James A. Ledgard (mother's maiden name Saxton) birth registered July→September 1922 in Wakefield district, and James Ledgard (mother's maiden name Heffernan) birth registered April→June 1933 in Bradford district, are any of these Jimmy Ledgard? Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 12:49, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth?
Talk:Jimmy Lewthwaite

message: The Barrow Raiders article states "The club launched their Hall of Fame in 2001 with 1950s legends Willie Horne, Phil Jackson and Jimmy Lewthwaite its inaugural inductees", yet the Hall of Fame on the Barrow RLFC] website doesn't show Willie Horne, Phil Jackson, and Jimmy Lewthwaite, but Bill Burgess (Senior), Bill Burgess (Junior), Charlie Carr, George Dobson, and Harry Gifford, which is correct? Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 14:33, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Hall of Fame?
Talk:Johannes Pfefferkorn

message: This article is incomplete. What was the suite of the pope's declaration for both parties?
71.163.114.49 (talk) 21:06, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  incomplete 

message: Jonathan Adams, Cordelia Hess. Tobias Epos (talk) 15:50, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  RS
Talk:Hayley

message: Hallie is not a variation of Hayley and so should not be included in the list of variants on this page. Hallie is by origin a pet form of Harriet, just as Hal is a pet form of Harry and Harold. Hallie was in frequent use as a given name in the 19th century before Hayley was used as a girls' name. See http://www.behindthename.com/name/hallie about this. Clevelandkentevans 21:09, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was going by the sources that I had. Other sources claimed that it was. Those sources were originally included in this article, but someone removed them. I have no personal preference concerning the name staying or leaving, so leave it out. I hate when two sources completely contradict each other. нмŵוτнτ 20:56, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hallie
Talk:Johannes Secundus

message: My dilemma: I don't know anything about Johannes Secundus. 
I want to know his birth date. Wikipedia says "November 15, 1511" but Google books copy of The Basia of Joannes Secundus says in the preface that he was born November 10, 1511.
See here:
http://books.google.com/books?id=KzAPAAAAIAAJ&dq=Janus+Secundus,&printsec=frontcover&source=bl&ots=fbuUK47DRO&sig=1DtnSp7kthRp5mAyGjvQ0uJGsSc&hl=en&ei=Q7j-StC_Dsa0tgfP3emRDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=10&ved=0CB8Q6AEwCTgK#v=onepage&q=&f=false
However, at that time the Julian calendar was being used, not our present-day Gregorian calendar. I don't know how or if birth months and days shift into our present-day calendar.
What to do?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiesd (talk • contribs) 14:40, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Johannes Secundus may have been born November 10, not November 15
Talk:Johannes Sleidanus

message: E. van der Vekene: Johann Sleidan, Bibliographie seiner gedruckten Werke und der von ihm übersetzten Schriften von Philippe de Comines, Jean Froissart und Claude de Seyssel ; mit einem bibliographischen Anhang zur Sleidan-Forschung, Stuttgart 1996.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.46.241.227 (talk) 17:49, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gliese 581b

message: It says this planet was discovered by HARPS, however, I believe only Gliese 581 c & d were discovered by HARPS and the "wobble" of the star. Gliese 581 b was discovered by passing in front of the star (transit). Can anyone confirm this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.12.88.5 (talk) 06:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the main article, Gliese 581 b was detected by HARPS but not by transit method. BlueEarth (talk | contribs) 22:14, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: HARPS?

message: The artist's conception image should be removed or at least taken out of the planet's infobox and placed as "decoration" in the text of the article. There's nothing encyclopedic (and a lot that's misleading or just fanciful) about this (and most "impression") images.   — Aldaron • T/C   23:04, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artist's conception image should be removed 
Talk:Mu Arae c

message: How far away from Mu Arae is it? What's the distance between its orbit and its star? 125.238.89.218 (talk) 21:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  distance? 

message: Hi all, i'm veryfing AAPS planets cited in the table and in this page there's no info. (for future memory)-- Windino [Rec] 22:18, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anglo-Australian Planet Search not menzioned
Talk:John Caius

message: See The works of John Caius, M.D., second founder of Gonville and Caius College and master of the college, 1559-1573. (Online: Open Library) Anka Friedrich (talk) 12:50, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography 
Talk:Dallas Cup

message: Just want to query the titles by team part, is it for the Under 19's Supergroup only? Cause in other divisions other teams have won, such as Hartlepool United have won a title in a different age group? Possibly a good idea to do it by titles per age group? Englishrose 19:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Query

message: Are the teams listed the teams for who the player is now playing, or who they play for nowed for then? I think Rooney would be Everton if the latter, and Carrick Man Utd if the former. Can we have some consistency?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.24.251.241 (talk) 12:38, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Club teams?
Talk:Mu Arae b

message: <  name="santos"> >
First of all this reference is used for the star and it is actually about the planets with no mention of star data.
http://exoplanet.eu/planet.php?p1=HD+160691&p2=b  
Secondly the data in these articles on the star and planet are contradicted by the data in this catalog which is commonly referenced in this encyclopedia. 
GabrielVelasquez (talk) 01:28, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Referencing errors on Star attributes and conflicting data 

message: This article is misleading people down the habitability path. It states there is a low eccentricity when in fact is is more than 10 times as eccentric an orbit as the earth's. 205.200.19.57 (talk) 21:34, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Misleading eccentricity/habitability exposition

message: At first glance I'm not finding any speculation about satellites in the references. (See also Mu Arae.) Chronodm (talk) 23:12, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Satellites
Talk:Mu Arae e

message: Requesting moves of the following pages:
* Mu Arae c → Mu Arae e
* Mu Arae d → Mu Arae c
* Mu Arae e → Mu Arae d
This is the naming scheme given in the Pepe et al. (02/2008) paper , which being published ahead of the Goździewski et al. (03/2008) paper  should be regarded as the discovery paper regardless of when the papers appeared on the arXiv preprint server. Furthermore it appears that subsequent scientific literature is using the Pepe et al. scheme, e.g.  86.171.72.213 (talk) 17:03, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Jinx Falkenburg

message: I saw some years ago a french documentary about Grace Kelly based on memoirs of Jinx. This was made after Jinx' death - I guess between 2005-2007. It reflected on the way of Kelly from an actress to a princess. I remember it because its POV was not only subjective but extremly interpretative. And viewing it I felt that many of Jinx interpretations did not fit for me with the pictures / moments she described and left me irritated. But in that documentary it was stated that Jinx met Kelly shortly after she arrived in New York. Kelly did model jobs to finance her acting school and Jinx choosed her for a job. After that they were friends and met regularly until Kelly left NYC for Hollywood. According to the documentary this was the reason why Jinx covering of Kelly's wedding voyage to Europe and Kelly's wedding was detailed, intimate and noteworthy. It also has pictures showing Kelly's very warm welcome of Jinx at the press conference before entering the ocean liner (the SS Constitution??). As I might not rememeber correctly and I do not  remember the name of the documentary: any other source for the friendship between both? (And thus that the friendship was one more reason for Jinx detailed covering of the wedding) VINCENZO1492  04:45, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background of covering Grace Kelly's wedding / Friendship? 

message: .The Mediterranean Edition of Yank Weekly, May 11, 1945, has the same photo of Jinx Falkenburg. I have an original of that issue. Mjneedles (talk) 02:17, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo of Jinx Falkenburg from Yank, the Army Weekly, Mediterranean Edition, May 11, 1945.
Talk:Duško Gojković

message: Agree - same person referred to in both articles. Duško Gojković should be a redirect. Philip Cross 19:22, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree - must be redirected to Dusko Goykovich. --Technopat 07:42, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge - I think Dusko Goykovich should be merged into Duško Gojković - and Dusko Goykovich should afterwards redirect to the natively titled article. BNutzer 15:48, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: there is no mention of his time with Woody Herman in the biography. 82.32.113.136 (talk) 18:24, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woody Herman
Talk:Gliese 777c

message: With the discovery of Gliese 581 C, this is no longer the smallese extrasolar planet known.
I would like to correct that, but I have no idea of how to reword it. I would rather leave it to the pros :)
Bobber0001 19:16, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is still one of the smallest (9th according to the Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia).— JyriL talk 13:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Leland (antiquary)

message: I removed the following ELs because they were too random, irrelevant (some of them) and otherwise have WP:EL problems. Some of them might be useful as inline references, though. I am pasting them here (as they were) in case anyone would like to work them into the article. 
* Oxford DNB article on John Leland   
* caerlon.net: John Leland   
* The Leland Trail   
* Walking in Somerset   
* The Legend of Camelot   
* John Leland (Episode in the BBC's Great British Journeys)    
* Great British Journeys: Interactive animated map (Select journey #7.) 
Novaseminary (talk) 19:58, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links section
Talk:John Mason (diplomat)

message: In 2008, in this edit, content was added to the article that was copied from the 2006 ODNB article on the subject. I've checked the older DNB, which is public domain, and this content is significantly differently. Since this material is copyrighted, I'm afraid it's going to have to be removed. It would be possible to simply revert the body to prior to these edits, but I decided to blank instead to give contributors a chance to rewrite it if they choose or to salvage subsequent improvements that do not result in a derivative work. Please let me know at my talk page if you have any questions. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright issue
Talk:Death of Joanna Lee

message: Can someone please explain why her date of death and the month she died in are a year apart? One says December 2000 and the other December 2001. Farslayer (talk) 09:34, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Died a year later? 

message: Ummm...is this real?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.6.123.162 (talk) 21:37, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems to either be non-notable or... a hoax. I really don't see how this article is relevant at all... 98.198.85.83 (talk) 08:46, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the case attracted WP:SIGCOV in New Zealand at least. (I don't speak Korean and don't have access to contemporary Korean newspapers, but I'm guessing it probably attracted media attention there too.) I've improved the sourcing, although the article itself still needs work. See also Janet Moses. Muzilon (talk) 20:37, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this... serious...? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: consensus to move the page to Death of Joanna Lee at this time, per the discussion below.  Dekimasuよ! 09:55, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Joanna Lee (exorcism victim) →  – Per WP:DEATHS and WP:ONEEVENT; victim was non-notable other than the unusual circumstances of her death. Muzilon (talk) 09:07, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a manslaughter conviction that was later quashed on appeal because the Court of Appeal ruled there had been procedural errors during the original trial; however, (as I understand it) the New Zealand authorities then determined it would be impractical to arrange the retrial because most of the surviving witnesses - including the accused - had left the country. There is a bench warrant for the pastor's arrest should he ever return to NZ. Muzilon (talk) 00:10, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

text: I'd suggest it's more similar to Killing of Janet Moses. Muzilon (talk) 01:39, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 August 2022 

message: The lead says (well, it still says) Luke Lee was deported but the article body just says he (and others) left. Can anyone verify which is correct? 
Padillah (talk) 13:07, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Pastor Lee was deported to Korea after being released from prison, while the other Korean witnesses apparently returned there voluntarily. That's why the article twice uses the word "deported" for Lee, whereas the Trial & Appeal section simply gives a blanket statement that Lee and the witnesses "had left" New Zealand. It would be incorrect to state that all parties were "deported." Muzilon (talk) 23:08, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deported or left voluntarily?
Talk:Gamma Cephei Ab

message: This page mentions in several places that the exoplanet in question was first suspected to exist in 1988. I noticed that the date wasn't cited, so I went looking for a citation. However, what I found was this article, which seems to say that it was in fact suspected by 1987:
I did also find this paper, published in 1988, which may be where the 1988 year is coming from. I don't want to make a change like this without consensus in case there's something I'm missing. I hope this seeming discrepancy can be solved easily.
–EveDK (talk) 22:14, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved this to the bottom (I accidentally posted it at the top to begin with). –EveDK (talk) 03:42, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of first report possibly incorrect
Talk:João Amazonas

message: From its beggining, eugenics was part of Soviet Union and Kommintern preaching.Ever communist, was also an eugenist; at least some decades ago.This man also supported the Lysenkoism  for many than four decades.Agre22 (talk) 11:52, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This communist was also an eugenicist 
Talk:Disgorgement

message: It says, "Disgorgement is a remedy and not a punishment." I diagree. To me it sounds like something that fully qualifies as punishment. Or is it "a remedy and not a punishment" because, unlike a true punishment where someone is tried, convicted, and sentenced, disgorgement is a remedy in that it merely rights a wrong, putting wealth back in the hands of those to whom it rightly belongs? Besides, the equivalent Swedish Wikipedia article, "Förverkande", places it under the category "Straffrätt" meaning, I believe, "Punishment law".--Solomonfromfinland (talk) 05:10, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In the Swedish legal system it may be that "forfeiture" is a punishment, however in common law systems (or at least that of England & Wales) disgorgement is aimed not at punishing the 'offender' but reversing unjust enrichment. Incidentally, this is why the box at the top of the article saying it can be expanded from the Swedish wikipedia article is almost certainly incorrect and ought not to be there. In any case, what the courts are trying to do with disgorgement is to prevent the party that has been unjustly enriched from continuing to be unjustly enriched. The aim is not so much to punish them by taking their unjustly gained wealth away (arguably it's not much of a punishment to take away something they never, legally speaking, had any claim to anyway), but to restore the situation to the way it was before the unjust enrichment occurred. 31.205.1.76 (talk) 10:42, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disagree
Talk:John Seymour (1474–1536)

message: A better form for an article title would be John Seymour (c 1474-1536). It seems oddly Hibernian always to leave out "Sir" but often include "Saint" or always "Pope". --Wetman 09:21, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Oddly Hibernian'? That's fighting talk where I come from, Wetman. And your name doesn't indicate you'd be much use, if it came to fisticuffs. --OhNoPeedyPeebles (talk) 18:16, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: He’s the son of a knight who’s father was never knighted, but his father was. The wives are common folk probably bringing a manor or money. That’s gentry? Lady Meg (talk) 09:49, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely. And he was the grandson of a peer. Johnbod (talk) 14:09, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prominent Gentry
Talk:Alain Hamer

message: I suppose some Spurs fans are angry with the penalty this referee called in the Sevilla - Totenham game, but please remember this is an encyclopedia. If we had to record anytime a referee called something unfairly, we'd take half the capacity of Wikipedia. This is just a quarter-finals Uefa cup game, for God's sake.
--Pikulin 19:32, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 
Talk:Joe Lynch (actor)

message: (Cross-posting this to the that articles talk page)
According to the "Wheelies" article, the theme tune was sung by the composer, Joe Griffiths.  I have no idea, but the two articles contradict each other. 109.145.250.164 (talk) 13:48, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theme tune for Chorlton and the Wheelies 
Talk:Gamma Cephei

message: How can a star possibly be made out of more than 100% metal?
89.15.238.20 (talk) 21:32, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the abundance of metals (i.e. non-hydrogen/helium atoms) in the Star relative to the abundance of metals in the Sun. The abundance in the Sun is roughly 1.69%, so a metallicity of 168% solar means 1.69 × 1.68 = 2.84%. Regards, RJH (talk) 00:02, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metallicity: 89%-168% 

message: News From The γ Cephei Planetary System AIP Conference Proceedings, Volume 1331, pp. 88-94 (2011) has better constraints and somewhat larger planet mass and lower eccentricity. Qemist (talk) 03:13, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orbital parameters of planet need update 
Talk:Johan van der Keuken

message: "Het Witt Kasteel" is gramatically incorrect in Dutch. So I checked the Harvard reference and found out that indeed the title should be "Het Witte Kasteel". I changed it accordingly. 
Erniecom (talk) 07:12, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Roland Garros (tennis)

message: this should be the page, but everyone here is retarded. move french open here instead of violating wikipedia policy. Bsd987 19:42, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Roland Garros (tennis)

message: Roland Garros is the official name of the tournament.  A "French Open" could be any international "open" sporting tournament in France.  Let's go with the official appellation instead of the generic term.  --Aquarelle 12:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roland Garros (official name)
Talk:Johannes Kerkorrel

message: Kerkorrel's influence on Afrikaans music up to the present is acknowleged and discussed by many commentators, but it is barely mentioned here. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:35, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy and influence 
Talk:Joe Modise

message: This article alleges that "Modise was never a member of the Alexandra Township gang, the Spoilers", but provides no evidence for this. The source linked says nothing about Modise's involvement in a gang, one way or another, which seems like something important to mention given that is a big part of him perceived by the public, and it would be a significant detail in his biography. Hopefully someone more knowledgeable than myself can sort this out, though I may try later on.
138.251.242.169 (talk) 01:08, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoilers gang