lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Facts of Reproduction

message: I say that the vfd process is more akin to lynch mob than a debate or a constitutional law process:
* The goal is to preserve global harmony at any cost
* The target is aniallated
* It is silly to call it a debate, it is merely a vote: a consesus is formed with little pro/con discussion
* Whomever shows up gets a vote (there is no scoping of the polling pool)
* Attacks on the author (Like JPotter's) (as opposed to discussion of the article) go unchecked
* Discussion after the fact gets shoved to a backwater
* No true negotions, mentoring, or remedial actions are possible
* It happens quickly and be started by a single user
Note also that unlike lynch mob, where the family is usually allowed cut down and bury the victim, you guys prefer to leave him hanging there forever as a warning to others.  An effective innovation: I admire your ingenuity to improve upon the orignal process. 165.247.212.93 01:53, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lynch mob model
Talk:City of Marion

message: If the extensive amount of information at the City of Marion website is applied to this article it would be up for feature quality. - Michaelgabrielsen 02:01, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead, but make sure it's your words, so as not to infringe copyright. I suggest info you move from Marion, South Australia should be moved in one hit with a comment that you moved it from there in the edit summary to make sure it can be traced. --Scott Davis Talk 06:35, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Resource

message: I have moved hidden content to here on talk page for review and possible reinclusion as unhidden. It is not useful being commented out on the page itself as no editors realise it's there! Please review this and reintegrate (uncommented) into the article as necessary. Donama (talk) 00:27, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved hidden content from page to here on talk 
Talk:Black+Decker

message: It appears that the appliance division of Black and Decker is now owned by Spectrum Brands (not by Stanley.) Mopep222 (talk) 15:59, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed 

message: I working Balck & dacker product in Dubai .I think you more business want so you visit for India Ahmedabad. 103.85.10.231 (talk) 03:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do manufacturers in india
Category talk:Township municipalities in Quebec

message: The description for this article, should state the clearly what is, and what is not a "township" in Quebec.  Does it exclusively refer to cantons?  What about parishes, and or other types of municipalities?   Anyhow, I'm not arguing with the category at this stage, because it first needs a proper definition.  --rob 02:14, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Quebec's "cantons" are known as "townships" in English. "Paroises" are "parishes". Other municipalities are designated "city", "town", "village" or simply "muncipality". - Farquard 03:34, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Andy Dick

message: Under the section "Other behaviour" it says "Dick groped Pamela Anderson during her 2005 Comedy Central roast" and also "Dick also mimed performing oral sex on Anderson's husband at the time, Tommy Lee" , while the linked source says this, the source is wrong, Pamela Anderson divorced Tommy Lee in 1998, and didn't marry Kid Rock until 2006, she was single in 2005. Lmcgregoruk (talk) 15:59, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pamela Anderson husband 

message: Under the "Discography" section under the section "Collaborations" I'm requesting to please add: 
• Gene Wilder’s Vacation - “I’m Not Better Than Anyone” (2021)  
Sources:       
• Gene Wilder’s Vacation - “My Best Friend” (2023)  
Sources:     
   TNDT9911 (talk) 04:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography / Collaborations edit 

message: grammar: change "he would go onto" to "he would go on to" 2601:1C0:5E81:BB0:4934:457F:5A61:25F7 (talk) 19:19, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: RudolfRed (talk) 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 March 2024 

message: Shouldn’t the stuff about his sexual misconduct be placed higher up in the article? I feel like given how extensive his history of being a general menace to society is, it should be more prominently placed Editmakerer (talk) 15:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede
Talk:Junya Nakano

message: I added a section talking about Nakano's style, but I'm not really an educated musician.  I put up what I thought best described his style, and what album and even song exemplifies it best, but I'd love it if someone could comment more intelligently on the matter. Klondike 13:47, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style Comments 
Talk:Richard Steven Horvitz

message: I was watching this advertisement on television and had to wonder if the guy with the curly hair was Richard Horvitz...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HETAnq5s58g
This guy doesn't resemble the pictures on Richard's web site, but the voice is unmistakably his.  Did they disguise Richard with a wig, dub in his voice, or is this all some crazy coincidence? --M.Neko 06:14, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Go Meat, Or No Meat?

message: * Look, I don't think it's that big of a deal, since the information on his kids is basically what was put on his Bio page and isn't any real information. It just says he has 3 kids. I think InShaneee is right about this. Just leave it be, I'm sure Mr. Horvitz won't mind.  --
InfallibleRoxi 14:46, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've restored the info. This is an encyclopedia, not a message board user profile. If he wishes for the info to be removed, he must PERSONALLY write an email to Jim Wales, as per wikipedia policy. --InShaneee 03:20, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Privacy

message: I thought he's usually credited as "Richard Horvitz" (without his middle name in there). Shouldn't the article be renamed to reflect this? There's a similar example with former Mystery Science Theater 3000 star Kevin Murphy (Previously the article was credited by his full name). -TonicBH 20:09, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: umm... this article has Richard Horvitz listed as a voice actor for Kung Fu Hustle, and I was wondering if he played the Team Rebellion Captain in Shaolin Soccer, which is another Stephen Chow movie.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.95.117.213 (talk) 03:02, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shaolin Soccer 

message: He voiced on an episode of Johnny Bravo in the episode "Bravo, James Bravo", He played the Evil Nerd.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by EpiSonic (talk • contribs) 07:20, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  voiced on an episode of Johnny Bravo 

message: Before anyone reverts my edit, this interview with Horvitz is proof that he is of Russian ancestry. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OS32jAJVHs  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doommaster1994 (talk • contribs) 20:41, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian descent
Talk:Éliane Radigue

message: I've changed this in order to clarify it - please, if you dislike my edit, change it back.
Emsvcs3 (talk) 08:57, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The following sentence makes no real sense (in my opinion), but I don't really know how to fix it. 

message: To add to article: the pronunciation of her surname. 173.89.236.187 (talk) 02:24, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add to article 

message: As contributions on Career section accumulates over time, current biography section became considerably redundant. I suggest rehashing the section with removal of repeated contents.
The above content can be an independent section addressing her early life and education, or personal life.--Cheesebomber (talk) 18:17, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Biography section & information redundancy in the article
Talk:Home equity loan

message: Why is it that Home Equity Line of Credit, in capitals, redirects here, while Home equity line of credit, in lowercase form (as it is used in the article), redirects to its proper article, HELOC?
This needs to be fixed.  
-Alan 24.184.184.177 (talk) 18:27, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's fixed, for both Home Equity Line of Credit and Home Equity Line Of Credit. Argyriou (talk) 22:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect Issues 

message: After noting the tag at the top of the article and seeing that there were references listed, I have removed these per WP:CIRCULAR, as Wikipedia cannot use itself as a source. The article needs actual references to reliable sources, and I encourage editors to provide these to improve the article. Doc talk 22:09, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article References
Talk:Friendly Persuasion (1956 film)

message: As I understand it, Quakers are highly egalitarian and I don't think such a term or concept exists with them. Is "an elderly Quaker" intended? Mutt Lunker (talk) 08:29, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Quaker elder?

message: I made an edit to the this entry that felt like it needed more than a few terse words of explanation.  The first paragraph originally concluded with the sentence "The father of the family is gradually converted to supporting the war."  This is misleading to the point that it misses the whole point of the movie.  The father was never opposed to the aims of the war (so conversion in that regard was unnecessary) but he never once changed attitude toward the evils of warfare (so conversion in that regard was refused). 
 
It was the son, not the father, who wound up actually changing his stance toward fighting and killing.  The son joined a militia and took part in an actual battle.  The father, on the other hand, went to the battlefield only to make sure his son was still alive.  Along the way he was even ambushed, and while he fought to defend himself from immediate attack, once his attacker was disarmed the father told the Confederate soldier to walk away, saying "I'll not harm thee."  Even under extreme duress (anxiety for his son, anger over having just discovered the dead body of a friend, and fear for his own life), the father nevertheless held on to his pacifist beliefs.  That is what makes the film so magnificent - it doesn't judge the son's decision as wrong, and it accepts that the son might very well be right, but the film also has the generosity of acknowledging the father's own heroism by *not* fighting.
I realize that this strays into the realm of opinion or even ideology, which is why I'm probably taking too long to explain this.  But saying that the father "converted" to supporting the war is also an ideological judgment.  That's why I changed the sentence merely to reflect that the family members had their pacifist beliefs "tested".
Sorry for being so long-winded in this explanation.
71.201.53.242 (talk) 23:53, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pacifism 
Talk:Scrumpy Jack

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 02:48, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion
Talk:Acid breaks

message: Hey sammy this is kirk do you have any new records from Zak Bi have a few of his old ones and i was wondering if he put out any more.and i also heard some where i cant remember where from.but his old work is like impossible do get a hold of i have tried now for over 7 years and i still havent found any of them .do you know how many acid breaks pressings he put out and also where i might get some thanks for your help ...kirk pantone
This article was nominated for deletion; the consensus was to keep it. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acid Breaks. CDC (talk) 23:05, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Loyce Biira Bwambale

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 02:59, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion
Talk:Bill Weld

message: Normally, if a section has no references, I add the  tag but I wasn't sure if that's the normal way to handle an ancestry diagram.  There is a Weld family article with some cites -- do we normally rely on that to act as the references? Any guidance (or citing) welcome. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 17:35, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Section tagged, suggest removal. AHampton (talk) 04:54, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the ancestry section be cited in this article? 

message: This is my opinion but I think this article with need some protection because he is challenging President Trump in the 2020 Republican Primaries.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MOADooAH1 (talk • contribs) 03:11, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe at some point. We don't generally protect articles which aren't seeing persistent vandalism. There are enough watchers on this article (including myself) that such will be noticed, and protection imposed at that time. Tarl N. (discuss) 04:57, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection 

message: A few months ago, user Bill cage created a navbox for weld, but i've noticed it only seems to appear in this article, and in none of the other weld related articles. Why is that?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sbob99 (talk • contribs) 14:04, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It could be because nobody added it to those other articles you are thinking of. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:40, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill Weld navbox 

message: I’ve seen comments in other articles about changing a portrait to better represent the subject.  On first impression, Weld’s portrait looks relatively bizarre: saturated so as to have a red face and yellow hair. I would welcome someone who knows about these things to find a better one. ConcernedReader101 (talk) 23:45, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portrait change?
Talk:Ellen Sharples

message: I have found more information on this artist. One of the problems is that her daughter, Rolinda, is better known, but she does not have her own Wikipedia page. As soon as Ellen's relationship to her famous daughter is established, there can be no doubt that she deserves her own entry, for Ellen taught Rolinda and established a museum in Bristol.Vsanborn (talk) 18:42, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding to this article

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 03:01, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion
Talk:Chiricahua

message: Trying to define the Apache group of bands called "Chiricahua" is difficult for several reasons. The names of the bands and their general location has changed over the last 500 years.  Other Native and non-Native Americans had something to do with this fact. Groups with an European ancestry tended to think of these bands as a "country/state" kind of organization they were familiar with, rather than a  group defined by customs and alliances of it's bands and sub-bands.  History tends to be re-told by the living with their own perspectives.  
I rewrote the introduction on this page to keep it simple. Rcollman (talk) 12:11, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction edits

message: With all due respect to every contributor to this page, it is very confusing.  I appreciate that the band name, leader of the band or leader of the alliance of bands is important to some people.  For me, the shifting alliances of sub-bands over time, is part of what makes the these people who they are.  Outsiders would label an alliance and then 30 years later, would have to come up with another name for a slightly different alliance.  The bands or their individual members were not confused about who they were or who they were aligned with at any given time.   
My suggestions: the "history" is easier to read because it follows a time line. I think the individual biographies are interesting.  Both sections probably need some sort of general statement that qualifies band names as being more or less correct for that point in time.  I would like to see kinship and alternative names stated in a consistent manner.  I suggest deleting the brackets that indicate a page link when none exist. While I know a little about 19th century history in the Southwest, I am not bold enough to suggest content changes
Rcollman (talk) 12:48, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments on whole page

message: Hi, so no need to redlink him anymore: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loco_(Apache) T 85.166.162.64 (talk) 01:03, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you,  - FlightTime (open channel) 01:11, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  There's an article about Loco
Category talk:American people of Russian descent

message: The category strongly intersects with :Category:Russian people in the United States but somehow  different: 
#Category:Russian-Americans is for Americans of Russian ethinic background, it probably  should not include Jews, Ukrainians, etc. 
#It also exludes Russians who did not receive American passport. 
#On the other hand it includes people with little connection to Russian culture who  probably  does not qualify to be Russians in  America (like Saul Bellow) but has Russian ancestors. 
Should we merge the categories, make one a subcategory of the other or keep both? abakharev 03:31, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Granby, Quebec (township)

message: The word "Township" is not apart of the official name.  Putting it in bold is bad enough, but capitalizing "Township" is especially bad.  Even it were the "township of Granby", it's not the "Township of Granby".  --rob 03:43, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's correct as is. In English, generics are capitalized when attached to name (eg the Province of Quebec; the City of Rimouski; the Island of Montreal). Farquard 18:19, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the second use of the word "township".  It would be ok, if it was done to link to a definition of the word "township" (in a Quebec context), but all the link did was take soembody to the the category page.  However, categories appear at the bottom of the article, and there's no need to link to it at the top.  --rob 19:46, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pacific Air Lines Flight 773

message: Maybe this article's title should be spelled out as Pacific Air Lines Flight 773. Philippine Airlines is also appreviated "PAL", and at one point or another there probably was a Flight 773. :p Coffee 04:06, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's probably a good idea. I hope to get to it soon, or you can tackle it if you wish. And congratulations on your recent adminship. I'm also from the RFA class of August '05. FeloniousMonk 22:26, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article reads: “With Flight 773 minutes from landing, Gonzales, seated directly behind the cockpit, burst into the cockpit and shot both pilots twice. [...] before shooting himself [...]“ and further “Investigators from the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) found in the mangled wreckage a damaged Smith & Wesson Model 27 .357 Magnum revolver, holding six spent cartridges.“ (bold text by me).
So, what's with the sixth shot obviously fired? Puzzled, --Gott (talk) 20:51, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of bullets/shots fired 

message: Good morning , Can you please explain how this falls under Mass shootings in the United States? It states "a gunman kills at least four victims" and "A broader definition, as used by the Gun Violence Archive, is that of "4 or more shot or killed, not including the shooter" This definition, of four people shot regardless of whether or not that results in injury or death, is often used by the press and non-profit organization". Thanks for your time. - Samf4u (talk)  16:47, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe we should remove it as any definition of mass shooting I can find states four or more shot. What do you think? - Samf4u (talk)  17:10, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem personally, but it is contradicted by the definitions it the list: "Mother Jones: 3+ shot and killed in one incident, excluding the perpetrator(s), at a public place, excluding gang-related killings." Dimadick (talk) 17:16, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Pacific Air Lines Flight 773 would be 2 shot and killed excluding the perpetrator I believe. - Samf4u (talk)  17:25, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Considered a mass shooting? 

message: Short text. Whiteguru (talk) 07:24, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Francisco Gonzales]] into [[Pacific Air Lines Flight 773]]
Talk:British European Airways Flight 548

message: "The inquest principally blamed the captain for failing to maintain airspeed . . ": inquest? or public inquiry??  – SquisherDa (talk) 16:59, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it was the public inquiry, not the inquest, that made these judgments. I stand corrected, and many thanks, Squisher. Valetude (talk) 22:00, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The inquest principally blamed the captain  . . ": public inquiry?? 

message: It’s a bit odd to see the aircraft’s path on a modern day map rather than one from near the date of the accident, I thought? 84.92.59.184 (talk) 18:55, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: No mention in the article of a Trinidadian being on board that deadly flight. My uncle Stanley Frederick was left out. Please update that information 2803:1500:E02:A5ED:79A6:3422:B1F8:55FB (talk) 02:56, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You are perfectly at liberty to edit the article yourself if you wish, though you may get an objection if you don't provide a citation (which would be churlish, under the circumstances, IMHO).  It is true that the Guardian article cited only accounts for 111 of the 112 passenger nationalities, and there is indeed a Mr S P Frederick listed as a passenger in the investigation report (though that doesn't quote any nationalities).  Go for it!  DaveReidUK (talk) 07:00, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It is possible that as a Trinidadian Mr. Frederick actually held British citizenship in which case he would be listed under the 'British' casualties.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.8.126.91 (talk) 10:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flight 548