Talk:Eli Stone

message: Shouldn't http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search/Eli_Stone_%28TV_series%29 forward here? I have no idea how to do that, just thought I'd mention it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.233.79.169 (talk) 01:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: URL Forwarding

message: Is this really appropriate to have in here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.208.206.125 (talk) 04:55, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The "Liberal bias" (a.k.a. "Anti-war bias") section seems to be entirely original research; it is not supported by any reliable source (other than a generic source about Iraq that has nothing to do with Eli Stone). I deleted it. Eubulides (talk) 05:16, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Liberal? As a non-American viewer the show seems religiously biased to me, if anything. All the characters seem to be religious to varying degrees and the speeches at court often make references to "God" and religiousness. While this may be a realistic depiction of American society, it seems awkward to someone coming from a more secular society. -- 88.153.29.247 (talk) 20:59, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just tuned in on another episode of Eli Stone and who'd thunk: a female rabbi's husband has been told by God to turn down chemotherapy and Eli defends his decision in court by saying God's influence can't be disproved. If THAT isn't theist bullshit I don't know WHAT is. It's certainly biased (and most certainly SOMEONE's soapbox), but it's certainly not "liberal" any more than it is "republican" or "democrat". -- 88.153.24.75 (talk) 20:01, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Theism or non-theism aren't necessarily liberal or conservative. I think most everyone aware of them would deem Heather Mac Donald to be more conservative than Cornel West. This series is mostly of a strong progressivist bent on sexuality, economics, and most other matters. The most recent episode had strong rants against corporate greed and the Iraq War. (I do enjoy it anyway)--T. Anthony (talk) 11:21, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: liberal bias

message: the series is also beign broadcasted in Argentina by channel Sony
can i add that?  Jim88Argentina (talk) 00:49, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Argentina 

message: It seems that the autism section is written in a biased, unencyclopedic tone. Jickyincognito (talk) 02:09, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I could see how tone could be biased, but how could it be "unencyclopedic"? More to the point, which words are biased; or what needs to be added to make the coverage encyclopedic? Eubulides (talk) 03:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

text: One part that I found biased was the idea that children who do not have vaccines are "endangered."  There is a scientific-evidence-based movement against the use of childhood vaccines, and thus I felt this statement was biased and not objective.  The sentence was rephrased. Crowclarice (talk) 02:26, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autism controversy 

message: A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion 
or exclusion of episodes and characters, as well as other fiction articles. Please 
visit the discussion at 
Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 11:19, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters

message: The section is somewhat long. I removed this  which was a completely irrelevant detail that had nothing to do with the show. The claims of one person may be relevant to the Thiomersal controversy article but not here. The rest of the section seems to be directly connected to the show, so I've let it stand for now. The only detail not directly linked to the show is "This hypothesis is not supported by scientific evidence, but has contributed to decreased vaccination rates that endanger children" however that's well supported and not simply the claims of one person, and is necessary to understand why the show's premise was controversial Nil Einne (talk) 10:26, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The idea that it "endangers children" is not necessarily true.  There is a strong evidence-based movement against the use of childhood vaccines that has nothing to do with the myth that they cause autism.  I rephrased this sentence because it displayed bias.  Crowclarice (talk) 02:29, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autism controversy 2

message: "The first of these unaired episodes, " <-- this (under "Production") does not make sense anymore, as there are no more unaired episodes (everything up to 2x13 was aired)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.54.127.6 (talk) 02:20, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date 

message: There is a Christian singer by the name of Eli Stone, his "bands" name is just Eli, I think its a pretty notable coincidence, maybe someone should tag it? (assuming someone cares at this point)PS Im not sure how to tag names or anything so uh...sorry?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.25.250.28 (talk) 22:55, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  notable trivia

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Eli Stone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081123044932/http://www.aap.org/advocacy/releases/LettertoABC.pdf to http://www.aap.org/advocacy/releases/LettertoABC.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.five.tv/programmes/drama/eli-stone
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090226210854/http://www.ezydvd.com.au:80/item.zml/804443 to http://www.ezydvd.com.au/item.zml/804443
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:36, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Eli Stone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080605031438/http://www.ctv.ca:80/servlet/ArticleNews/show/CTVShows/20080602/ctv_fall_launch/20080602/ to http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/show/CTVShows/20080602/ctv_fall_launch/20080602/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:51, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I propose replacing this utterly pointless trivia:
with something like:
Add that they're available on DVD/Blu-ray, if that's the case. 
The current material's detail-mongering simply isn't encyclopedically pertinent (WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE).  — AReaderOutThataway t/c 00:39, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airtime trivia