lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sanlaap

message: On 22 May 2010, I.P. 122.163.3.238 created a new section titled "Revolution" which mentioned several names described as Sanlaap interns. The names  don't have much of an internet presence except Facebook accounts.  Not notable anyway. No citations were included. 122.163.3.238 made several changes to the entry. All of the info seemed somewhat plausible, but also could be an attempt at aggrandizing self and friends.  Then 118.95.15.150 joined in and the two I.P.s roughly alternated edits.  122 first attempting to create something plausible, 118 making obviously non-constructive edits.  The last edits of 122 on 22 May were non-constructive. I reverted the whole shebang based on the lack of citation and BLP issues.
On 23 May 2010, 122.163.3.238 created a section titled "REVOLUTION" with substantially the same information as the plausible version of the day before, naming the same non-notable names and again without citations.  Again another I.P (118.95.18.66 this time) joined in, and at first they alternated making somewhat plausible edits.  The last edit by the new 118 was similar to an edit by the 118 of the previous day and was reverted by another editor. I later excised the whole section from the article; it has no citations.
122, 118, if you are trying to improve the article please include citations to demonstrate the notability and the accuracy of the information you are adding.  Thank you. --Susfele (talk) 02:23, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revolution (deleted) 

message: My name SUTAPA pal.I am housewife.My husband is a businessman.He always told me,you are not a work anything,and i am so useless person hole world.HE always said me,are you need 1000rs a month? i have no answer.I am class x pass,so i said him may i started tution classes in home? his answered ,no because this job is lowerclass.My father is dead 2010 reason of throught cancer and my mother,brother(25yr old).They are not rich so i am not going my parents home.I had twin baby girl,boy(10 YR old).They learn english medium school class 4.My husband had a a.c room and a car and he always said ,these things uses not your capacity.Sometime i need some money he said i wast his money.SO i think i am going any shelter with my children and do some work.But i dont know where i am going? please help me.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.203.170.48 (talk) 04:27, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  mentalli torchur
Talk:The Great and Secret Show

message: Some time in mid-2006 this article was visited upon by a huge, bloated, blow-by-blow account of the plot, which had grown to nearly 2500 words.  There doesn't seem to have been any significant plot summary before then beyond the precis in the lead section.
It would be nice to have a brief summary, perhaps a fifth or a quarter of the size of that monster, but since it seems unlikely that any such slim creature could emerge by chipping away at the larger edifice, I have decided simply to remove the thing in the hope that some talented reader will be inspired by a clean sheet to produce something wonderful. --TS 03:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll take a stab at it.  It's been a while since I've read the book, but I should be able to adjust it into a more concise, better written version. I never had a problem with the length but did feel it was rather amateurishly written and formatted. Quiddity99 (talk) 21:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks.  The quality of the writing is really what matters.  The length is negotiable. --TS 22:06, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm done with an initial draft, which was able to compress the summary to approximately 1/3 its former size without losing a great deal of depth. A lot of the stuff in the former summary had little relevance to the overall plot and was able to be removed without ruining things. Quiddity99 (talk) 22:19, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

text:  Thanks.  That's a remarkable job of compression. --TS 22:28, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary
Talk:The Great God Pan

message: Anyone against a chapter breakdown for the novel?  The episodic, semi-atomic nature of the chapters lends itself to this. —12:37, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chapter Breakdown?

message: Having not read the novella, but being very interested in it, I wonder if someone who has could clarify the last line in the plot summary: is the girl in London the daughter of pan and the madwoman, or the daughter of pan and the granddaughter of said madwoman? The wording of the current sentence is a little confusing there. User:Snyrt  —Preceding undated comment was added at 01:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarifying statement. 

message: Who and what are Clarke and Villiers?  No explanation is given.  67.231.66.125 (talk) 19:38, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Characters in the story, apparently adult and presumably male. The person synopsizing here apparently felt no necessity of giving either a designation any more than Machen did. In the novella--see https://www.gutenberg.org/files/389/389-h/389-h.htm for text--the first is introduced without even a first name anywhere near, and the second is described as "a man about town", hardly a suitable insertion in the Synopsis as written, and left equally unchristened. I see no reason to edit the synopsis for more than the adequate clarity it already has. GeorgeTSLC (talk) 02:14, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters 

message: Does anyone else think the photo of Oscar Wilde is as gratuitous and misleading here as I do? GeorgeTSLC (talk) 02:02, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I do. In fact, I consider every image in the article other than the infobox one and perhaps the one under "Background" to be gratuitous. I made that point in the "GA Review" section above, but the GA reviewer disagreed. Deor (talk) 03:09, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oscar Wilde's face
Talk:Liberal democracy/Archive 1

message: “Liberal democracy is a form of representative democracy where elected representatives that hold the decision power are moderated by a constitution“
A constitution is required for a Federalist government but is not necessary for a Liberal Democracy. The United Kingdom has no written constitution.
“A constitution that emphasizes protecting individual liberties and the rights of minorities in society, such as freedom of speech and assembly, freedom of religion, the right to private property and privacy, as well as equality before the law and due process under the rule of law, and many more.”
These rights feature in the American constitution but once again is not necessary to a Liberal Democracy, Australia has no bill of rights in its constitution.
“They would argue that, by prohibiting citizens the right to cast votes on all issues (especially for serious subjects like going to war, constitutional amendments”
In Australia constitutional ammendments can only be made by decision of a public referendum where people vote for or against the proposed ammendments.
This article seems very American-centric to me and ignores the fundamental aspects of Liberal Democracies and instead opts for a discussion about majoratarianism and protecting minorities.
A textbook defintion is more along these lines:
“A liberal democracy is a political system in which democratically based institutions of governance exist alongside liberal conceptions about the rights of individuals and about market-based mechanisms for economic production and distribution” -- Aumimk 19:49, May 8, 2005
:Please feel free to carefully edit the article to deal with the bias.  It also might be useful to propose your rewrites here and get comments first. — Stevie is the man! Talk | Work</span> 01:21, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
::Read the article about R. J. Rummel.Ultramarine 01:12, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  American-centric
Talk:Liz Mitchell

message: It seems prudent to have a a disambiguation page for Liz_Mitchell and Elizabeth_Mitchell seeing that Liz_Mitchell goes by her full first name Elizabeth on her website youaremyflower.org... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fayshaw (talk • contribs) on 28 March 2006.
:Right -- the Boney M. singer is NOT the Ida singer. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Emoedison (talk • contribs) on 21 June 2006.
::Elizabeth Mitchell (disambiguation) started. - BanyanTree 02:54, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: disambiguation
Talk:Henry Archer

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 04:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite right dear Sir, I wrote both NoelWalley 11:23, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, ok. Good work :-) Haakon 11:26, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:List of parrot species classified by families

message: Source: 
"New data:  Tavares et al. (2006) sequenced 8 genes, mitochondrial and nuclear, for a total of almost 6400 bp.  Their taxon sampling included 25 of 30 genera of Neotropical parrots.  The well-supported nodes that affect our sequence are
 
 • Deroptyus and Pionites are sisters (100% Bayesian support, 100% ML bootstrap support)
 • Myiopsitta and Brotogeris are sisters (100% Bayesian support, 100% ML bootstrap support)
 • Nannopsittaca and Bolborhynchus (lineola) are sisters (100% Bayesian support, 100% ML bootstrap support)
 
Wright et al. (2008) also sampled sequenced 3900+ bp of mitochondrial and nuclear genes, including a different set of genes from Tavares et al., and included 23 genera of Neotropical parrots plus 46 from elsewhere.  Therefore, the results of this study represent a largely independent assessment.  Their results were impressively concordant with those of Tavares et al., namely:
 
 • Deroptyus and Pionites are sisters (99% ML bootstrap support)
 • Myiopsitta and Brotogeris are sisters (100% ML bootstrap support)
 
They also found that:
 
 • Nannopsittaca and Touit are sisters (100% ML bootstrap support)
 
However, they did not sample Bolborhynchus, and Tavares et al. did not have Touit, so this is not a conflict. Nannopsittaca and Touit are adjacent in our linear sequence.
 
And also found that:
 
 • Leptosittaca is sister to Diopsittaca + Guarouba (84% ML bootstrap support), and is not close to Aratinga, with which it is frequently associated"
Proposals for changing the linear sequence of Psittacidae is currently carrying a 100% approval rate by the South American Classification Committee.
--RedwoodsHermit (talk) 07:37, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Linear Sequence Change

message: Have a look at the formatting used in the Japanese Wikipedia :ja:オウム科 (Sibley). Their layout seems to be much easier to read. G.A.S  13:10, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is incorrect. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 22:05, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout 

message: A lot of the links on the article page are redirects.  Is it Pygmy-parrot or Pygmy Parrot; is Fig-parrot or Fig Parrot? The unhyphenated formed seem be used more often.  I would like to see a consensus prior to a lot of work being done to sort out the link and redirect confusion. Snowman 19:58, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirects
Talk:Conching

message: At http://www.claro.ch/english/pagesnav/PR.htm I found this snippet:
"In order to allow the exquisite flavour to develop to the full, the ingredients are conched, that is to say refined in traditional mixer-grinder units, for up to 78 hours – three to six times longer than normal. Thanks to this process, the addition of emulsifiers can be dispensed with."
I don't know if it would be ok to quote this in the article itself ?  Maybe more experienced folks can take this up.
I think this may be accurate but a little misleading - juxtaposing two aspects of what goes on at this stage of the process. There are certainly at least two distinct effects achieved during conching: the generation and/or modification of flavour through chemical reactions ("cooking") and the reduction of the viscosity of the chocolate. Emulsifiers are used to reduce the viscosity but (should) have no impact on the flavour.
(Winstonchocsmith (talk) 19:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

message: *'Chocolate Manufacture' from  Cocoa and Chocolate - Their History from Plantation to Consumer by Arthur W. Knapp
*  
* 
Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 15:03, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference

message: Discussion copied from User talk:Premeditated Chaos
: here,  here, 
::
:::
::::
:::::I missed that you had inserted a bare URL in the middle of a sentence, where it was hard to see, and was contrary to the guidance at WP:NOELBODY. Aside from a comment about how long conching may continue, I do not see anything in that New Yorker article that supports the material you added to the article. As the article was a profile of a worker, and not about the process of conching, I don't think it should be used as a source in this article. There is the also the issue that you improperly removed sourced content  - Donald Albury 02:50, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conching edits
Talk:The Black Pimpernel

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 
Talk:Frostbite (2006 film)

message: Clean up and address both, please.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.91.128.102 (talk) 19:01, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar & Perspective
Talk:Proto-Indo-European to Dacian sound changes

message: * Deva - city in Romania. Is it comming form Dacian dava/deva? 
*: unlikely. Romanian language lost intervowel "v". bogdan 17:22, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about some etimologies

message: Recent studies have shown that thraco-dacian is part of the Centum languages see fragment, for arguments. do look into that. or try buying the whole book. :P 
p.s.: there's something about this article that makes me approach it with skepticism. perhaps it's the satem/centum thing. or perhaps the fact that the author completely forgot about the obvious, omnipresent "carp", but insisted in mentioning the forgotten, irrelevant for today's romanian, "akmōn" IleanaCosanziana 23:56, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Satem, but Centum
Talk:The Bermuda Triangle (book)

message: Well, its a start :)DanielDemaret 11:46, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you scroll down, Dictionary.com cites its source as Wikipedia. That article is basically a mirror of Bermuda Triangle. —Whouk (talk) 15:17, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

text: * Oh, what fun and joy.DanielDemaret 16:32, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Action Transfers

message: I remember this artform from my childhood but am unsure whether Kalkitos is its real name (and I'm suspicious because the rest of the article's content is dubious). The article could be of use if the name is correct and some of the silliness is removed. Does anyone know if this name is correct before it is cleaned up? I couldn't find anything in a Google English language search. Jilly 11:49, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup? 

message: The article describes this as a game.  Wouldn't it be more accurate to call it a toy or a craft item, maybe a kind of sticker? B7T (talk) 05:41, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I get your point, now that you mention it. I would call Kalkitos a game in the broadest sense of "amusement or pastime", and this sounds better than "toy" as this usually means an object that can be played with, which only roughly applies to a sticker that you stick to a background and that's it. In a sense, I would say that a war-themed Kalkitos set is more akin to a war-themed coloring books than to toy soldiers, and I'm not sure coloring books would be called "toys". "Sticker" is very specific and correctly classifies the Kalkitos figures per se, but fails to represent their purpose, which is to be used by children for amusement. But alas, I'm no native speaker, so I'd better leave nuances to those who are. Anyway, I have replaced "game" with "pastime" as a partial improvement. Moongateclimber (talk) 13:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Game"?
Talk:AppImage

message: What are the drawbacks? If there were none we'd see all our software done just this way. I understand the attraction of the approach, but they come with drawbacks by their very nature: multiple versions of libraries, etc. 8 klik limit is mentioned, what else? I feel this should be mentioned.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.7.83.142 (talk) 17:00, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: IMHO: do mention, do not compare. --logixoul 11:59, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

text: .cmg is similar to .dmg --148.81.137.4 00:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Hi, from reading this article is seems like klik and PortageLinuxApps are so distinct from the present format known as AppImage that maybe we should not mention them as earlier names in the lead, but rather as predecessors. Frankly if we had enough information to create reasonably sized separate articles I'd argue they'd belong in separate articles. Fuse809 (contribs · email · talk · uploads) 08:21, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should klik and PortableLinuxApps be included as synonyms? 

message: There is a discussion at Talk:Klik (disambiguation)#Primary on whether Klik should redirect here (as Klik (packaging method) already does.) Please feel free to add your input. --Nat Gertler (talk) 22:58, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing the redirect 

message: https://appimage.github.io/apps/
--Tuxayo (talk) 19:47, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention the main repo for AppImages 

message: It's not the case for Snap.
That might be the case for AppImage, if this could be confirmed, it would be worth mentioning. Since when comparing AppImage to traditional repos or with Snap or Flatpak it's an important question.
maybe a source (though primary): https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/wiki/Similar-projects#application-distribution
--Tuxayo (talk) 20:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we have multiple repos? 

message: The "Lead too short" template was added in October 2009, when the lead was indeed a very short line about klik (as it was called back then). A lot has improved since then and I would say the current lead seems sufficient. So I took the liberty of removing the template. --MichielN (talk) 13:35, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro length seems fine now
Talk:Providence and Worcester Railroad

message: It would be nifty if a map were provided which distinguishes between owned and leased lines. -- Beland 02:18, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: Was the P&W always a freight-only railroad? -- Beland 01:12, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type of service 

message: This is an excellent and entertaining article, and kudos to the editors who've worked on it.   Ravenswing      01:15, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  FA 

message: The article mentions one accident, but there must be others. Most rail company articles have an "accidents and incidents" section. Mjroots (talk) 17:18, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: In my research for bringing the article to GA and subsequently FA, I have been unable to find any records of serious accidents besides the 1853 collision, and several sources (including Karr's The Rail Lines of Southern New England) explicitly state it was the only major accident in the company's history. There have been minor derailments, of course, but overall the company has had an excellent safety record. One story was published last year about G&W's safety record in Connecticut, and notes several P&W derailments in 2022, but none were notable enough to merit inclusion in the article, in my judgement. The article also notes that overall, G&W's accident rate per hour worked is less than half the average of U.S. railroads. I am aware many articles have an accidents section, but this is not a Class I railroad with thousands of miles of tracks. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 18:21, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Accidents
Talk:Contact (musical)

message: This article needs to explain what the play is actually about. -Branddobbe 12:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

message: I don't think this is a stub.  The synopsis is pretty complete - what there is of it.  The article needs more background and analysis, but the basic, easily accessible information about it is here.  -- Ssilvers 14:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:David Berman (graphic designer)

message: Truth in Advertising: I'm completely new to this person.
That said, someone who has been president of a professional association is famous enough for the wiki. Also, the article is by a new editor. Give the person some time to flesh this out. --CTSWyneken 12:13, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bio test 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ktrachsel01 (talk) 01:07, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Graphic Design History
Talk:Kyujanggak

message: "Kyujanggak" appears to be well-established and also preferred by the institution.  -- Visviva 12:33, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 
Talk:Licata

message: In the article it states the Cicero wrote of corn being exported from Licata’s port. Very curious, since I thought corn was introduced into Italy in the 1500s being brought back from the new world (Americas). 67.87.74.218 (talk) 05:02, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cicero writes of corn exported from Licata?
Talk:Franz Urban (footballer)

message: Does anyone know what nationality Urban was? or if he was a member of the Black Hand?
Gator64
The name of the driver of the archdukal car WAS NOT Franz Urban - that's a fictious claim that has been haunting the internet for some years. The man's name was Leopold Lojka (also written Loyka). Lojka was a chauffeur in service of Franz Count Harrach (who on some pictures of the assassination can often be spotted as standing on the running-board of the car) a friend of Franz Ferdinand who placed his car - and driver - at the archduke's disposal. Lojka was - according to his testimony in the preliminary inquiries to the trial (publicise e.g. in W.A. Dolph Owings "The Sarajevo Trial"), wherein he states his personal data, a Czech. Since this article is misguiding and even wrong, as far as the "information" it is supllying is concerned, I'd recommend to remove it. 
Zsasz
Thanks for that Zsasz, it seemed a bit too coincidental that it was Frazn Ferdinand, in Franz Joseph Street whilst Fraz Urban was driving. Seemed that having the name of Franz in Sareyavo on 28 June 1914 seemed to be bad luck. Thanks for clearing that up.
Gator64
I think we should keep this page. The name is so ingrained that it's helpful for people here to be directed to Loyka's page. 
Macgroover (talk) 15:54, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:Katedralskolan, Lund

message: ----
Since this is not an actual cathedral school anymore and hasn't been so for more than a century, I would suggest treating "Katedralskolan" as a proper noun and move the article to Katedralskolan, Lund. The origin of the name should still be explained in the lead. It should be noted that, as all public secondary schools in Sweden, it was long known as "Högre allmänna läroverket in X", which is the name one will find in a large number of biographies of former pupils. Note that the brief English presentation of the school doesn't translate the name, but calls it "Katedralskolan in Lund". u p p l a n d 12:53, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason it it is named Lund Cathedral School is simply because that is what it was called in "Lund". So I have no objections to renaming it. Henrik 18:59, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Now renamed. Henrik 08:32, 30 March 2006 (UTC)