lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Adventure Comics

message: All references to "vol. 2" should be changed to "vol. 3", the real vol 2 was the one shot of 1999 (from the "Justice Society Returns" storyline).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.157.74.24 (talk) 15:29, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vol. 2?

message: I changed the number of issues to 503, because I think that makes the article consistent. The article says that it started in 1935 (rather than 1938 when it became Adventure) and discusses the series prior to the assumption of the title Adventure Comics. Thus, I think the total number of issues should also include the New Comics and New Adventure issues. --JamesAM 20:35, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Total number of issues

message: Does anybody else think the section "Collected editions" should also include whatever (hardback) Archive volumes include stories from Adventure? This would include most of the Legion of Super-Heroes volumes, and at least one Golden Age Starman volume as well. Even the Black Canary one would count, as it includes her back-up stories during Supergirl's run here. Speaking of her, while her own Archives haven't gotten this far yet, her first Showcase Presents includes a story from #278. That's only one isolated story, and the pretty bird's solo stories here seem to have been pretty sporadic, so maybe not them, but the Legion and Starman archives seem more significant than the Bizarro World volume. thoughts?--Tbrittreid (talk) 22:36, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collected editions
Talk:Ari Thorgilsson

message: In case anyone thinks this is a copyright violation, I wrote the original text at E2, of which this is a modified version -- Palthrow 19:29, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi, I propose reverting the name change (and changing article). Discuss the general lettere issue here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_%28people%29#What_to_do_about_Icelandic_people_.28letters_.C3.BE_and_.C3.B0.29.3F comp.arch (talk) 10:50, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, per WP:BRD and consistency with all other WP Iceland articles. User:Comp.arch, for future reference if you cannot move yourself per WP:BRD you can use Technical Move at the head of WP:RM. In most cases (such as this where sources support the original title) an admin will restore the title for you. Of course the mover can still put in a formal move request. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:36, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert name change of article
Talk:Treason Act 1351

message: :compassed or imagined the death of the King, his wife or his eldest son and heir
This section appears to use "imagine" in the now-archaic meaning of "to plan".  Is this correct?  Since the explanation is translated, anyway, should it be updated?
RandomP 19:32, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "imagine" 

message: According to the article, "A person was guilty of high treason under the Act if they: ...violated the King's companion..." What is meant by "companion"? Is it the same as "wife"? If so, why the word "companion" is used as opposed to "wife" in the previous section: "...the death of the King, his wife..." Top.Squark (talk) 16:47, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The King's Companion 

message: According to the article, "A person was guilty of high treason under the Act if they... levied war against the King in his Realm or adhered to the King's enemies in his Realm" What about levying war against the king outside his realm, or adhering to enemies outside his realm? Is it not treason? What is the logic behind this? Top.Squark (talk) 16:49, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance of the "Realm" 

message: The article says However while in England and Ireland forgery of the seal of Great Britain ceased to be treason in 1861, this change did not take place in Scotland until years later... suggesting that eventually the change _did_ occur. However, the continuation is ...and forging the Scottish seal is still treason in Scotland but not in England or Ireland. So, is forging the Scottish seal still treason or not? Top.Squark (talk) 16:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There are two seals, the British seal and the Scottish seal. In Scottish law it is treason to forge the Scottish seal, but not in English law. It is not treason to forge the British seal in either Scotland or England. I will look at how to make this more clear in the article. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Richard75 (talk) 18:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conterfeit of the Scottish Seal 

message: I've added a paragraph to the "Content" section to say how the punishment for treason has changed to life imprisonment with no seizure of assets, since the sections on crimes tend to mention later revisions. I think this is correct, but I'm not a lawyer, so could easily have missed something.
I have since noticed that more or less everything in this article is covered in the High treason in the United Kingdom one, as well as some other thing which seem relevant to this topic (such as that the act covers the Queen, but not Prince Philip). Is this how things should be, given the age of the Treason Act? Or should the articles be changed to make their scopes clearer? I don't really know how things work here. Aoeuidhtns (talk) 22:40, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to the punishment
Talk:Comateens

message: The brother's actual surname was Dembling, not North.
The following page contains a section regarding the Comateens, by a fellow who purports to have known them and even gave the band it's name.  There are some interesting tidbits about the origins of the band.
http://www.ramalama.com/about.html
:There are a few errors in this article. Lyn Byrd operated their drum machine when they were a duo and didn't join the band as a keyboard player/vocalist until Ramona Jan left and Oliver joined the band.  This according to their official web site.  That ramalama link no longer says anything about the band. That info is now at http://www.therousers.com/about.html  DavidRavenMoon (talk) 13:14, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello Wikipedia - I have removed the proposal to delete this article because Comateens were a well established group, there is a very large amount of outside internet sources that can verify the information in this article, and I have provided links, both internal and external, to some of them. This article contains no direct quotes.Nicholas West 08 (talk) 03:20, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of PROD tag
Talk:Heckler & Koch VP70

message: Should we mention references in popular culture?  Because of the futuristic look of the VP70, it has been a popular choice for sci-fi.  The standard issue pistol prop of the Colonial Marines in Aliens was a VP70.
:Lists of appearances by this or that weapon in popular culture have been such a problem in the past that the Military History project drew up some guidelines, which you can find here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history#Popular culture. As an example, the case you mention would not qualify, because it isn't notable and it would also encourage lists of other appearances. (ps. Please sign your comments using ~~~~).
:--Deon Steyn 05:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Popular Culture

message: Yeah, if anybody is confused by this, this is Germanspeak translation of blowback.  I changed the infobox, will look at the text to make sure. --Asams10 (talk) 04:04, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Recoil Inertia Bolt?

message: VP stands for Vollautomatische Pistole, not Volkspistole - a term coined by the nazis and, in any case considering that it was neither particulary cheap or even available for the people, a bit anachronistic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.6.3.56 (talk) 19:46, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought so also, mainly by looking at the German language article. But can you find a good source that supports Vollautomatische Pistole? I could not. I found however one I think is reliable that gives the other version: Volkspistole. Best, Sam Sailor Sing 22:03, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: A Russian site, Modern Firearms, explains VP-70 as Volks Pistole model 1970. The full automatic version is called the VP-70M. If V stood for Vollautomatische (full automatic), why add an M to the full automatic model designation and why would the semi-auto-only civilian version be VP-70? (Added: (I have read that the VP-70M was the original version, that it was intended to be issued as a Volks weapon for urban defense in case of a Russian invasion, and that the semi-auto-only w/o provision for a shoulder stock was the VP-70z for export to USA. But there are no fully reliable sources on the VP-70.) Updt: NRA American Rifleman called it VP 70 Vollautomatischepistole model 1970, notes that the original was renamed VP 70M (Militar) when the VP 70Z (Zivil) was introduced.) -- Naaman Brown (talk) 01:33, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Volkspistole
Talk:Underworld (film)

message: Rather than deleting the page, the best thing to do will be to redirect Underworld (film) to Underworld (disambiguation) and list all the films there. This solution will also cater for those advanced users who type in "Underworld (film)", not knowing that there are more than one film with that title. Any objections? <KF> 19:38, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Talk:Bordello of Blood

message: I think that the part about censorship is outdated.  I saw it on AMC TV today and the female vampire said masturbate and there were no digitized clothes.98.212.153.8 (talk) 04:27, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Censorship 

message: I recently saw this movie on USA. It is a pretty good horror movie
216.93.123.9 01:07, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Okayyyy... Weird. Never seen anyone talk about movies here.101.178.163.208 (talk) 01:32, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Don't Know 

message: Just did minor modification in the plot. So, discussion not needed.101.178.163.208 (talk) 01:32, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot
Talk:Jerry Only

message: I love that 1977 pic of him! hahaha! Madangry 19:51, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I must say that is one funny picture. Wonder where they dug that up? Frank Aggro
Where'd it go, though?----Nishad 17:28, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I found another 77 picture of him that ive been thinking of uploading. Its not funny but pretty cool. It shows him with spiked hair and if i'm not mistaken, lipstick. ghostbear616 08:56, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Added it in. If you have any more information on his involvement, please add it! 782 Naumova 14:38, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Osaka Popstar

message: "He has said that he has no desire to let former singer Glenn Danzig and guitarist Doyle Wolfgang Von Frankenstein rejoin The Misfits because of their negative vibe, and "they don't bring the right stuff to the table".  "  is a pretty strong statement, especially without any citations. I never heard anything like that, and think it should be removed until a source is found -Soapy5  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.203.225.84 (talk) 00:43, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: line about danzig and Doyle

message: I think it's stupid of us not to have a picture of him sporting the hairstyle he invented.  Whether or not he invented it is debatable, but he certainly made it popular, I think there should be a picture of him with that hair style instead of some crappy old photo.  Anyone else? Kniesten 22:39, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Devilock

message: There isn't any rumors about a misfits reunion...the last info is false!!
It must be cancelled
--FFF Fight For Freedom! 12:37, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: False info

message: How come there's no mention of his and the other misfit's career in WCW?
I put some info up and some tosser deleted it. Cokeandaroll 09:59, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Career in WCW

message: "In November 2011 Jerry Only threatened to cancel a show in Richmond Virginia if a band known as Blitzkid didn't cancel their own show which was meant to take place the previous night. Blitzkid ultimately ended up canceling their show so Jerry would play. The reasons for the threat remain unknown though has been placed as an instance of "bullying.""
The only citation of this is from a blog that is copying Blitzkid's Facebook status. Is that really a valid source?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.99.250.45 (talk) 16:56, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blitzkid?
Talk:Agent Steel

message: google "Agent Steel Thrash Metal"
google "Agent Steel Speed Metal"
Not 100% accurate but look at the number of hits...
I think it is fair to say that agent steel are definitely speed metal. They are known as speed metal far more widely than thrash metal. WP:NPOV. --PureHolocaust 19:55, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I speak on behalf of the WP:HMM in the fact they are not Speed Metal as its not a genre, and bands are not listed as coined terms on Wikipedia. Ley Shade 01:29, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They always been a speed metal band, but the latest album (from 2007) is closer to thrash metal. That does not meen they are a thrash metal band anyway. Calling them a thrash metal band is giving a false image of the band. --KEN (talk) 12:40, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre debate 

message: Theres a lot of incorrect information in here, but i'm going to be doing a lot of "housecleaning" to make the page better the next few days
Maelstromlusby (talk) 02:40, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Information 
Talk:Hy Zaret

message: I have classified this article as a start. It needs sourcing for the bulk of the article. Capitalistroadster 07:09, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start classification

message: This is a short article, I don't see the need or value to create additional sections.  Please explain the need for a tag
--Work permit 03:38, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sections

message: I googled the section.  I find no copyvio.  Please provide evidence that this is copy-pasted from some other source (I assume you believe it to be Steve Huey, All Music Guide).  I personally added the sentence about his education, so I know that sentence is not a copy-paste.--Work permit 03:38, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy Paste
Talk:Break of Reality

message: The history needs to be re written in a more encyclopedic voice
There was at least on case of being written in first person.
I am cleaning up this (Esoltas)
I removed this sentence They are a contemporary of the band Apocalyptica.  because I don't recognize the significance. RJFJR 18:10, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think that, once the names and dates we need are obtained, we can take this off the cleanup taskforce's list. Sophy's Duckling 02:47, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:EQ2Mystic

message: To postpone the deletion of this page, the trivial (and readily availible) information about in-game spells has been removed.  I speak for the Everquest II community when we ask for a solution that allows use of a wiki.  Realizing that in-game material is no encyclopedic (sp?) in nature, it should be taken outside of wikipedia.  External wiki'ing is currently underway at eq2.wikia.com and given no objection on this talk page within 1 week time, I will put the external link to that address directly on the front page of EQ2Mystic and perhaps suggest replacing all mentions of EQ2Mystic with the external link (as this page has very little value).Risce 06:17, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So you want it deleted? On one hand, wikipedia does not accept game guides (which this is) but it also doesn't accept exceptionally short articles like your new proposition. So teh only way to sort this out I'm afraid is to get this deleted. J.J.Sagnella 20:17, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Bob Marshall-Andrews

message: the "several observers" part could be disputed. For ex the Tory MPs present never aknoweledged BMA mentioning the word faggot
:I'm not in the least surprised that Bob's Tory mates would deny that. MRDA, as they say. But I've got the sources and added them, and they are quite clear: it is observers, in the plural. David | Talk 23:45, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not a sufficiently verifiable source for the article, but if anyone's fretting on a personal level, don't. I know personally, via a mutual friend with whom Bob was speaking the next day, that he seemed as surprised as anyone else to be accused of saying faggot, and to find that folk didn't seem to understand faggio. I note none of "observers" have come back and contradicted him. And trust me, I would be as annoyed as everyone else if I thought he were guilty as charged. JackyR | Talk 15:40, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  several observers 

message: Well this is a nice, neutral page, isn't it? I'm not actually going to slap POV and cite templates on it - yet. But it would be nice if you could add refs and clean it up yourself. I've removed and brought into line a few of the worst examples. But your description of M-A on the election night doesn't quite match what I saw - I seem to remember him being told by someone he'd lost, and asked for comments, which hardly constitutes "announcing" it. It would be best if you could provide refs (to the film? How?). Otherwise I will have to delete the whole para as being unverifiable in one direction or another; this would be sad, as I agree with you it's a nice bit to include ("I'm Lazarus", he was reported to have commented). JackyR | Talk 14:53, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  So, no bias then? 
Talk:Freaked

message: Infobox tag has been removed as article already has one.  If you have any problems with this please post a message on my talk page. RWardy 19:52, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox Tag

message: This may be too minor to mention, but the comic book adaptation mentioned here was largely buried - it was only sold through Walmart, and even then only has part of a four-comic book set, the other comics being three issues of Eek! The Cat (which were also exclusive to that set.) You can find a fuller description of the set here, at the publisher's website. I won't add material related to this myself, as I have a WP:COI, being one of the writers on the Eek! issues. --Nat Gertler (talk) 06:42, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comic book 
Talk:Lucius M. Walker

message: 1. He surrendered at Island Ten and was some exchanged. This occurred in April 1862, at the time of Shilon. This falsehood about being sick at Shiloh has been repeated many times. Further, almost all photos of him are photos of Rueben Lindsay Walker. An unfortunate pagination in an early Civil War books created this false impression.
:This was corrected - thanks! The sources and references did refer to the illness at Shiloh, so good catch! Scott Mingus
2. According to some sources, He served under Leonidas Polk at Columbus . KY , building the fortifications that were later abandoned at Bearegard's insistence.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.213.8.217 (talk) 21:40, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistakes in article
Talk:Mundelein, Illinois

message: The reference used for this list of top employers for the city links to a report from the city of Douglasville, Georgia. Doesn't seem to be related or have any info on Mundelein, IL.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomahennessey (talk • contribs) 18:58, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Resolved issue.  Updated list based on 2017 report.  Updated reference to link to the report. Archer1234 (talk) 03:00, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Top Employers

message: April 2006 (UTC)
dkfnmgfngjggggggggggggggggggggggggggggsdko;
* That fact is straight out of the village "official" history, compiled by the village.  I have posted a reference link to the history page at the village website. (Terryn3 04:00, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This section has several old, or ill-defined references.  The seminary has a history page at https://usml.edu/about/history/ but it doesn't address the land disposition.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timwarner (talk • contribs) 17:37, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  References in history
Talk:UC Berkeley School of Public Health

message: i uploaded the school of public health logo as cal.jpg, but decided to take it off the page because i don't have adobe photoshop and couldn't enlarge it without it looking pixelated. if anyone has the time to enlarge it, please do so.
here is the image:
thumb|right|150px|UC Berkeley School of Public Health (image removed as the name now links to a commons file completely unrelated)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 08:33, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo

message: The logo actually can go to the commons, its simple geometrics and text, not copyrighted (but trademarked and such)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 08:38, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo, redux
Talk:Love (1991 film)

message: The original sound track is by Ilaiyaraaja from the Telugu movie Prema. Same tunes have been used for Hindi movie. It is worth mentioning on the side bar. Mageshsai (talk) 22:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Love (1991 film) →  – Dab from Love (1991 Soviet film) * Pppery * it has begun... 18:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 June 2024
Talk:Professor Hamilton

message: Does anyone know why he took on the role of Ruin?  Insanity? Crispin Giles 15:00, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As I understand it, he was resentful of being sidelined in favour of other scientific advisors.  I haven't read the comics in question though, there may be more to it (the article does mention Hamilton's theory about Superman draining energy from the sun). --KingAndy 00:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for becoming Ruin

message: Okay, I'm fairly certain that Professor Hamiliton should not be the main page for Professor Emil Hamilton. As I'm not too familiar with the movement process, would someone kindly make the move to a better suited title? --DoctorWorm7 03:17, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Title 

message: Ruin (comics) redirects here.  The first thing on the page is a spoiler warning so people don't accidentally read that Emil eventually becomes Ruin.  If somebody comes looking for information on Ruin it's going to be pretty obvious who he is.  Is there a way to reconcile those two things?  Maybe have a separate, skeletal Ruin page with a spoiler warning and link to this as full article?  Or just develop a full and complete Ruin article, there's not a great deal about Hamilton's MO or activities as Ruin here. --KingAndy 00:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ruin Redirect