lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Norah Jones

message: The link to Sue Jones is incorrect. It links to the page for Ravi Shankar. 2601:2C4:C980:A290:60F2:CCED:95B9:B403 (talk) 16:51, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong link 

message: I removed from the intro:
:Jones's fifth studio album, Little Broken Hearts, was released on April 27, 2012; her sixth, Day Breaks, was released on October 7, 2016. Her seventh studio album, Pick Me Up Off the Floor, was released on June 12, 2020. 
This belongs in the article body, if anywhere. Zaslav (talk) 03:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive intro detail
Talk:Wage labour

message: "Wage labour has long been compared to slavery by socialists."
wasn't that the official position of the republican party in the 19th century?
I would replace it with "by several institutions across the political landscape" unless someone want to do more research.
That would just be adding to the seeming bias in this entry by not presenting counterarguments to the views that equate wage labor with slavery. 
Furthermore, you're only referring to the Labor Republicans who by no means had the same views as most Republicans at the time. Also, I've heard many argue that the Lincoln-era Republican Party is more consistently aligned with today's Democrats and you can't have it both ways.  Suhmanthuh (talk) 15:10, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: 19 century eclass economics artical 41.113.36.60 (talk) 17:05, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  description of the source of the comparison of wage labor to slavery
Talk:VIA Metropolitan Transit

message: This article's title is misspelled...it should be moved to 'VIA Metropolitan Transit' (and links updated). Albanaco 21:53, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Albanaco 22:02, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I just got registered here and was wanting to upload the company's logo can someone get the logo here http://i26.tinypic.com/2zg98qc.gif and update it? Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thelvynd (talk • contribs) 09:34, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: Really, 46 million per day?  There's less than 2 million in the SA metro area.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.243.49.141 (talk) 05:54, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ridership 

message: It looks like Primo doesn't run on a dedicated busway or even use queue jumps, although it does use stations, offboard fare collection and signal priority. Is it BRT, BRT-light or just a dressed-up limited-stop bus? Ibadibam (talk) 22:16, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Primo BRT? 

message: Should information about KSAM be added to this page, specifically the future plans for the Green and Silver BRT lines? Junimeek (talk) 00:48, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advanced Rapid Transit
Talk:Timeline of Houston

message: Should there be a separate section for weather/disaster events? It seems like there's many events that could be listed but many would drown out the importance of other important historical events. Ufwuct 15:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate section for weather events?

message: I am surprised that the evacuation isn't mentioned.
I don't see the significance of the Angelton murders or the related articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hourick (talk • contribs) 18:22, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hurricane Rita evacuation and other events 

message: While in whole I wouldn't mind the merge, the page itself would be so long, it would be difficult to navigate, so I'm apprehensive on a merge.--Hourick (talk) 23:51, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: IMHO, "Past events" and "Historical events" are one and the same and duplicate. I'm unclear of the criteria that would determine which page that a specific event should be added. I support that the Past" be merged/included in the "Historical" article. Postoak (talk) 00:19, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is old news, but "Past events" is now "Past entertainment events of Houston" which accurately describes the events to be included here. Postoak (talk) 17:38, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging of Past events in Houston and Historical events of Houston 

message: Similar lists of this type are named "Timeline of (City Name)."  Should this be renamed as such?  As far as I've seen, this and Historical events of Dallas are the only ones named this way.  Leobold111 (talk) 22:11, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename? 

message: There are no references in the Murders section. I am not inclined to do the research on these. Oldsanfelipe (talk) 16:39, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: No references
Talk:Jo Ann Emerson

message: I removed this recently added pargraph:
: On the weekend of January 20, 2006, Emerson and her husband Ronald Gladney took a two-day trip to Santa Barbara, California for the purpose of "spiritual self-reflection." Expenses ($1,108.70) for the trip were paid by the Fetzer Institute, based in Michigan. In a travel disclosure form, Emerson wrote that the purpose of the trip was "A time for spiritual self-reflection and an open and honest dialogue."
This text provided no information regarding what the point of the pargraph is.  Has some sort improper activity been alleged? Is it trying to say that she is a spirtual person?  Should we be concerned about involvement with the Feltzer institute (whoever that is)? Overall -- what is the relevance of this paragraph?  Could whoever added this or someone that has information regarding this, please determine what the relevance of this to the article is.  If it is relevant please modify the text to make that apparent and restore it to the article. kenj0418 22:03, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-reflection 

message: this is mildly amusing, but probably not significant enough to include.  just leaving it for reference in case anything ever becomes of it campaignwise. Derex 06:39, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Obscene Letter

message: Please do not remove messages from this page - such an action may be considered vandalism. Thanks TigerShark 18:51, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of messages from this page

message: Ms. Emerson is no longer in Congress; she is the CEO of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (NRECA).Hickory19 (talk) 10:37, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  CEO of NRECA 
Talk:Kingdom of Calontir

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 22:03, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: I'd like to work on this page a bit. I'd like it to end up looking a little more like the Outlands page.
Also, can we get a few more articles started for some of the other kingdoms? There are several with articles and many without.
Wilhelm meis (talk) 22:56, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Zannanza

message: The information in this article needs to be carefully differentiated between the historical person and the character from the manga, who is based on the historical person.  User:Zoe|(talk) 22:05, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Separated out section for fictional depiction of Zannanza in Red River -- the Zannanza Affair is reasonably well-documented in both Egyptian and Hittite sources (at least, as much as a 3340-year-old diplomatic spat can be!).  -- Miwa * talk * contribs ^_^ 09:35, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fred Jewell

message: More fairly well known marches by Fred Jewell:  Denver Post, Floto's Triumph, Galop, Go, Gentry's Triumphal, High and Mighty, March to Mecca, They're Off, Trombone Blues.  Didn't want to make the list too long, so I didn't add these with my other changes to this article today.  
Charleshanon 22:07, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jonathan D. Spence

message: I just added a lot of info from the bio that is the external link.
I also added certain bits that I knew myself (such as his family life and nonacademic publications he writes for).
Aroundthewayboy 15:37, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is his son really a Scottish football manager? Call it prejudice, but frankly, I have my doubts! --OhNoPeedyPeebles (talk) 12:07, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  His son? 

message: User ArthurTafero has included information on a course he worked on for BarnesAndNoble.com and is specifically mentioning his own name. This seems to be rather blatant self-promotion (and plugging for BarnesAndNoble.com as well). Furthermore, it is not notable enough to include, and it is an unverifiable claim for which no reference can be found and which sounds more like something from Barnes and Noble's own promotional material for the course. I removed it and he undid my revision. I would like to know what others opinions are. -Devin Ronis (d.s.ronis) (talk) 12:11, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: A few days ago, I moved this info to the "Honors" section, where it seemed useful and appropriate, though still unreferenced. The reference tag is normally left for long enough for somebody to supply it, so my suggestion is to leave it there and everybody will be happy. But I could not find any online reference to this course or to Tafero except on his website, so I agree that we should remove mention of this "honor" unless a reference is given within a few days. ch (talk) 20:13, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  First ever online course about China 

message: He died on 25 Dec 2021. 2001:8B0:E9:1:D5DC:5774:A389:ED8D (talk) 12:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  His death
Talk:Rugila

message: Of course, if Ruga and Rugila are indeed the same person, as it seems, the two articles should be merged. (Note that, right now, the best description is found in the disambiguation page Rua.)  Pasquale 22:38, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, it is garbage that somebody read in a popular history book written by some confused amateur. Centrum99 (talk) 05:54, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The name is related - more probably than the wild etimologies in the article - to the Old Slavic рокля meaning skirt. Some of the Huns wore a long coat or caftan which resembled a skirt, and they wore a white undergarment which looked like a skirt as well. In Hungarian it's been preserved as rokolya (skirt) and ruha (modern meaning shifted towards "piece of garment / clothes").178.48.177.1 (talk) 14:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Rugila - Rok(o)lia - Ruha
Talk:Ruga

message: Of course, if Ruga and Rugila are indeed the same person, as it seems, the two articles should be merged. (Note that, right now, the best description is found in the disambiguation page Rua.)  Pasquale 22:39, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is just different spellings offered by the Latin and Byzantine writers of the same name.  The articles should be merged.  User:Abou Ben Adhem suggested it back in January but looks like he never followed up with the actual merge. --Stacey Doljack Borsody 23:09, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I was waiting to see if there was a consensus as to which name it should be merged under. E. A. Thompson's The Huns has him indexed under "Rua"; Maenchen-Helfen's "World of the Huns" has him indexed under "Ruga". On the other hand, "Rugila" seems less ambiguous—Google searches for the first two names yield few hits relevant to the Hun king, but the results for "Rugila" are almost all relevant. --Abou 07:18, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:2006 New Year Honours

message: I removed the link to Darrell Anderson since it was to an article about an unrelated Darrell Anderson also in the armed forced but in the Army rather than the Air Force and an American rather than a Briton. Qrc2006 05:19, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Darrell Anderson

message: I changed the following text: Fahmia Huda, Grade 7, National Holocast Memorial Trust, Home Office
Now it says: Fahmia Huda, Grade 7, National Holocaust Memorial Trust, Home Office
I assume the first text had a spelling mistake in the word holocaust. If it wasn't a mistake in the first place feel free to change it back.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.227.58.24 (talk) 15:34, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Probable spelling mistake
Talk:Tudor navy

message: This article is a mess.--shtove 22:48, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Care to elaborate?  I have subheaded and cleaned it up since then. Neddyseagoon 18:14, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: There is a pretty major lack of references across the whole article, as well as a pretty limited list of sources  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.155.171.32 (talk) 20:57, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: The Tudor navy was the navy of the Kingdom of England under the ruling Tudor dynasty (1485–1603). The period involved important and critical changes that led to the establishment of a permanent navy and laid the foundations for the future Royal Navy. 2402:3A80:19ED:92B1:0:0:0:2 (talk) 15:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: To try and expand on the article, the history of the Tudor Navy seems satisfactory enough as just a rough summary. Maybe an addition that could be made would be a section to the types, themes, and common characteristics in the ships of the Tudor Navy or summarize the basic design philosophy of the ships for the period. MrHistoryBunny (talk) 00:32, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: MrHistoryBunny has added information to the article that were identified in the 22 February 2023 comment. UKHistory23 (talk) 22:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: These edits made by MrHistoryBunny, can be further changed. "Technological advances" should be changed to "Technological Advancements." Also, much of the information under "Characteristics" could be considered as relevant information under Technological advancements, particularly its' second paragraph, which is about just that. Perhaps review and then combine or reorganize both sections for conciseness. Jtk2023 (talk) 16:53, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tudor navy 

message: The 1589 English Armada should have some coverage, as the 1588 Spanish Armada is already given coverage. Especially with the loss of 40 ships in 1589. -- 65.92.247.90 (talk) 14:28, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Counter Armada
Talk:Camphill Movement

message: Moving the following here:
etc etc. (Dcaplin501 11:44, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved first-person account here from artile

message: This article has no references at all. It is in violation of the arbitration rulings concerning anthroposophy-related articles and has been so for months. If adequate, non-anthroposophical sources are not cited in the next week or so, I will propose it for deletion.DianaW 03:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I *am* proposing it, and you've already had months. The arbitration was back in January and applied to the entire "family" of Steiner/Waldorf/anthroposophy articles on wikipedia. Fred Bauder was clear that the basic problem is using only or mainly anthroposophical sources to "document" that anthroposophy is the greatest thing since sliced bread. There are a couple dozen such articles that are exactly that - little mini-brochures that function to suggest anthroposophy does so many wonderful things for mankind. Like I say, the arbitration was in January, and it is clearly quite all right with the anthropsophists who have written all these articles that they sit forever and ever like this if no one hollers. I'm saying, either get to work fixing them or they should be deleted. Wikipedia isn't free advertising.DianaW 12:21, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is now well-referenced and stands in accordance with arbitration rulings. Hgilbert 17:20, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article is in violation of arbitration rulings

message: Rather than including detailed information on individual Camphill villages here, it would be better to start individual articles on each. This article should focus on common elements. hgilbert (talk) 19:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individual villages 
Talk:J. L. Granatstein

message: Do we really need to have Professor in the initial mention of his name?  Also do we need to mention all of his degrees as part of his name?  (Especially his BA and MA given that he has a PhD.)  Any thoughts?  Cjrother 23:03, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have one thought: less is more.  HistoryBA 00:03, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I would keep OC, FRSC, and PhD.  The rest can go, as far as I'm concerned.  HistoryBA 00:54, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've taken out the BA and MA but I left the LLD.  I'm not sure if that is a real degree or if it is honorary.  Cjrother 21:29, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titles 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move to J. L. Granatstein. The assertion that this is the author's common name across a variety of media has not been effectively refuted. The search results clearly favor the proposal. As noted by 24.77.*, the COMMONNAME policy does not mandate "firstname secondname" form when another one is much more common.  No such user (talk) 14:28, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Jack Granatstein →  – WP:COMMONNAME, Google Scholar results 4,740 vs. 1,850, most or all of his publications are under the form with initials (t · c) buidhe 08:52, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: What bearing does the Order of Canada citation have here? Those citations consistently use full names irrespective of common usage. And The Canadian Encyclopedia seems to avoid using initials in biography titles as a matter of policy (they even title their article on J. S. Woodsworth "James Shaver Woodsworth"!). 24.77.42.223 (talk) 23:36, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 May 2021 

message: Disappointed to see his spouse listed as totally incorrectly. What happened to basic fact-checking here? So strict keeping important women from gaining wiki bios, and still this. (OK rant over). JDHumphreys (talk) 00:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: On further review, this entire article is filled with misinformation and unsubstantiated claims. I have removed until each can be properly cited. JDHumphreys (talk) 00:54, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facts
Talk:Word of Wisdom (Latter Day Saints)/Archive 1

message: This article is very Latter-day Saint-centric; however, I believe other Mormon sects have a different perspective on the Word of Wisdom. I propose creating an article called Word of Wisdom (Latter-day Saint), and making this article about the D&C section and the generic Mormon view (which is probably about the same as the pre-1851 Latter-day Saint view).  Comments? COGDEN 23:35, 3 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. The previous material on this page was moved to Word of Wisdom (Latter-day Saint). COGDEN 03:56, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this article too LDS-Centric?

message: There's an article called Words of Wisdom, which isn't doing so well, and seems to be about the same thing as this one. If anyone who knows more about LDS than I do can verify this, please merge them, or put the following tag on this page, and someone else will do it later:  Zach (t) 19:21, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:SOG Knife

message: Info on "SOG Assisted Technology" would be nice to see.  It looks interesting: http://www.sogknives.com/Folding/SAT/sat.htm -- Sy / (talk) 23:34, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

message: There are now two pages - one for the SOG Knife and one for SOG Specialty Knives. One is a knife, one is a company. PLEASE - do not advertise for companies on the SOG Knife page. This will lead to re-editing, and wasting of everyone's time. Thank you--Bcnstony 02:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separated Pages 

message: What does sog mean 174.215.178.109 (talk) 03:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does sog stand for
Talk:Acorn Communicator

message: According to this page, this article seems to have numerous factual errors.
1986 sounds like the right date for the Communicator, I seem to remember it being mentioned in the news columns of Acorn User around that time. 1982 is definitely too early: the BBC Micro was barely out at that stage (and Acorn had serious manufacturing and availability difficulties with them back then), let alone the Electron.
Other refs:
* AcornHistory.
* This also implies the Communicator was released post 1985.
* This site has scans of the Communicator user guides which he dates to 1985, 1986. 
Cmdrjameson 23:37, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  These points appear to have been addressed in the text now, but said text claims that the machine was sold commercially whereas the picture says it was never released. Shome mishtake here, surely? - Ed. Liam Proven 12:51, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no picture now anyway. --Trevj (talk) 14:51, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed

message: Much of this article bears a remarkable similarity to this one: http://www.computinghistory.org.uk/cgi-bin/sitewise.pl?act=det&p=1327 86.143.50.243 (talk) 01:17, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio? 
Talk:Kyriakos of Makuria

message: I am surprised that the article still says that Cyriacus invaded Egypt in 722AD which has no historical backing at all. Read the History of the Patriarch of the Coptic Church, which is attributed to Severus of Ashmunin. The invasion happened around 750AD. Read the Live of Khail (743-768AD).
Imad Boles
86.130.246.253 (talk) 18:13, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Kyriakos could not have invaded Egypt in 722. According to the Coptic writer John the Deacon (which his Life of Khail, the Coptic Patriarch from 743 to 768 form part of the History of the Patriarchs of the Egyptian Church attributed to Severus of Ashmunin) the inasion happened during the reign of the Abassid Caliph, Marwan the II (744-750) and his Egypt'd Governor Abdel Malik (749-750). The invasion happened in the first part of 750 AD to free the Coptic Patriarch Khael (who is also called Michael I).
This may be correct (Budge is not a careful author), but this is not integrated into the article, argumentative, & not clearly sourced. (Where is this "History of the Patriarchs of the Egyptian Church attributed to Severus of Ashmunin" to be found?) -- llywrch 23:37, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I've since been able to find a copy of Severus' work, & have updated the article accordingly. -- llywrch 02:37, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: the date of the campaign was around 748 (Derek A. Welsby: The Medieval Kingdoms of Nubia. London 2002, 73, ). This also fits the date of the Patriarchs of the Egyptian. -- Udimu (talk) 18:09, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Did he really exist? Or was this person a mere hoax? I've Googled "Mikael of Makuria", only seeing 33 results, and none of them can be regarded as reliable, while some of them are copied from certain Wikipedia pages. Hope that Wikipedians proficient at history of Africa verify this person's existence.--RekishiEJ (talk) 13:57, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  About [[Mikael of Makuria]]