lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ghost corn snake

message: I suggest this article be deleted, of be made a redirect. The "ghost corn snake" is merely one of a myriad of color variants of Elaphe guttata (corn snakes) produced over the last few decades by the commercial snake breeding industry, particularly in the USA. These "color morphs" are hardly a natural occurrence and there is very little to say about any particular one, except perhaps who first bred them, their family trees, etc. The names are also totally arbitrary. It might be interesting to create a sub-article for Elaphe guttata with information and images of some of the many color morphs, but that's about all. Not really info for an encyclopedia. --Jwinius 13:27, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Should be deleted
Talk:2006 Women's Intercontinental Cup

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --SFB 12:04, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: Looks pretty good after the last revision.  I'm not sure I agree with the three playoff brackets being removed, though. -- ArglebargleIV 13:30, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Brackets

message: These are the two possible playoff brackets that can be included in this (and other qualifier) pages.
This is the (simpler) bracket currently used in the 2006 World Cup article :
This is a bracket that I modified from another one.  It has the same information, but is a more compact, and clearly lists the pool positions that the teams came from.

This one also has the advantage that it has enough parameters so that it can be used for other brackets than the top-level -- it is easily used for the fifth-through-eighth and ninth-through-twelfth playoffs as well :

:I prefer for simple one, because not confusing anyway, and easy. Cheers --Aleenf1 02:35, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ah. but the simple one can't be used for the 5th-8th and 9th-12th sections, though, it is hardcoded for first through fourth only. -- ArglebargleIV 05:00, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible playoff bracket templates
Talk:S.P. Korolev Rocket and Space Corporation Energia

message: Is it correct to characterize RSC Energia as the "launch service provider" for Soyuz U launches? Do they perform the same functions that e.g. United Launch Alliance provides for Delta II launches? (sdsds - talk) 05:59, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RSC Engergia as the launch service provider for Soyuz U 

message: About Korolev's former design bureau, what is toady known here on wikipedia as S.P. Korolev Rocket and Space Corporation Energia (it is complicated, bear with me).
It's historic names included:
*Special Design Bureau number 1 of R&D Institute number 88 (Russian: ОКБ-1 НИИ-88 or OKB-1 of NII-88)
*TsKBEM (*)
*NPO Energia (*)
*S.P. Korolyov RSC Energia
It's current name seems to be:
*OAO S.P. Korolyov Rocket and Space Corporation Energia (Russian: Ракетно-космическая корпорация "Энергия" им. С.П.Королёва Raketno-kosmicheskaya korporatsiya "Energiya" im. S.P.Korolyova)
Or short:
* Russian/Cyrilic: Ркк Энергия (Ракетно-космическая корпорация "Энергия")
* Russian/Latin: RKK Energiya (Raketno-kosmicheskaya korporatsiya "Energiya")
* Anglicized: RSC Energia (Rocket and Space Corporation "Energia")
Most of these contain several more or less helpful redirects (with and without various spelling "differences"). The problematic redirect (as it is used several times) seem to me to be "RKK Energia", which seems to be a mash-up between the anglicized Energia and the Russian/Cyrillic abbreviation Ркк, transposed to the Russian/Latin RKK (if I am not mistaken).
I would recommend using either RSC Energia or RKK Energiya, but not RKK Energia, but would ask someone to check if this is right.
Any thoughts on this?
(*) If anybody can contribute to the article what TsKBEM and NPO Energia stand for, it would be fabulous.
--Tony Mach (talk) 12:16, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirects "RSC Energia", "RKK Energiya" and "RKK Energia" 
Talk:American Astronautical Society

message: The Space Times may have updated from a print publication to an online-only publication between 2016 and the present, which is a cost-saving measure that I've seen before in membership-based academic groups. The magazine's tagline was "The Magazine of the American Astronautical Society" as recently as its September/October 2016 issue, but it is currently listed on the website as "The Voice of the American Astronautical Society." I'm not sure if there's a print version at this point.
Michaeltyu (talk) 19:50, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question: Is "The Space Times" online-only now? 

message: More sources about the AAS might be found by cross-referencing notable fellows of the society, recognized by the AAS for "their outstanding contributions to astronautics". 
Fellows | American Astronautical Society
Michaeltyu (talk) 20:03, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential Sources
Talk:Apollo Telescope Mount

message: I call attention to MOS:INFOBOX and the essay WP:Disinfoboxes. Exactly which infobox should be used? And the article as it stands is so short, it would be a type 2 disinfobox. JustinTime55 (talk) 22:49, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Why an infobox?
Talk:List of schools in the West Midlands

message: Is this article intended to be a list of schools and their location with appropriate Wikilinks to other information, as per most of the list, or is it intended to be a list of links to the school's web sites as appears to be the case in the Coventry section of the list?
May be the purpose needs to be clarified at the top of the article for future editors to follow.
Keith D 07:48, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

message: There is no section for high schools, there are several in worcestershire like South Bromsgrove High School.
:There is no reason why there should be, high schools are covered by the "Secondary Schools" sections. The difference is merely one of semantics and not practice. Rje 01:22, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: High Schools

message: Each entry into this article needs to follow a consistent format, at the moment it's a bit of a mess.
I propose: Name of School - Location
I don't think specialist status such as language college, sports college etc. is necessary in this article, that's something for the articles on the schools themselves. I'm going to cleanup the article now. Alex9788 (talk) 10:44, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just started to implement what I wrote above, but it's a big article so I've barely scratched the surface. In fact it almost seems like I've made it more of a mess than it was before. I'll try and do some more later, and I'll add a cleanup tag. Any help from other editors is greatly appreciated, as are suggestions to improve the style, format and appearance of this page. Thanks, Alex9788 (talk) 11:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Style

message: Should this article be split into seperate lists? It may make it more manageable. Please comment, Alex9788 (talk) 11:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it would be much better to split this article into lists representing each individual county as opposed to the entire region. This list could double in length quite easily if every school was added! - Erebus555 (talk) 14:58, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest that if it's going to be split, then it should be by LEA. Fingerpuppet (talk) 21:24, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

text: As no one has opposed the idea, I will set about splitting the article in the way suggested by Fingerpuppet. - Erebus555 (talk) 14:33, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

text: It's been about one and a half weeks and I have finally finished writing the List of schools in Birmingham article. I think you can appreciate how much work the next batch of lists are going to require if they are to be structured in a similar way. So, any help in working on the articles would be very much appreciated! Thanks. - Erebus555 (talk) 20:22, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Split article?
Talk:Ritsuryō

message: Just for reference, this is a copy of a chart in Kojien that can be used to show how the gov't was organized under the ritsuryo system.
*神祇官
*太政官
**左弁官
***中務省（中宮職,左右大舎人寮,図書寮,内蔵寮,縫殿寮,陰陽寮,画工司,内薬司,内礼司）
***式部省 (大学寮,散位寮)
***治部省 (雅楽寮,玄蕃寮,諸陵司,喪儀司)
***民部省 (主計寮,主税寮)
**少納言
**右弁官
***兵部省 (兵馬司,造兵司,鼓吹司,主船司,主鷹司)
***刑部省 (贓贖司,囚獄司)
***大蔵省 (典鋳司,掃部司,漆部司,縫部司,織部司)
***宮内省 (大膳職,木工寮,大炊寮,主殿寮,典薬寮,正親司,内膳司,造酒司,鍛冶司,官奴司,園池司,土工司,采女司,主水司,主油司,内掃部司,筥陶司,内染司)
**弾正台
**衛門府
***隼人司
**左右衛士府
**左右兵衛府
**左右馬寮
**左右兵庫
**内兵庫司
**後宮十二司
**春宮坊
**左右京職
***坊令
****坊長
***東西市司
**摂津職
**大宰府
**国
***郡
****里
***軍団
Bueller 007 (talk) 07:38, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gov't structure under the ritsuryosei 

message: Maybe someone who knows how to do language links could link to Japanese wiki: 律令制?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.132.36.114 (talk) 07:41, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to other languages
Talk:André Cailloux

message: Nice article! I learned quite a bit of new information. I took the liberty to clean up the article a bit to make it more similar to other Civil War articles. As a reference, you may want to look at User:Hlj/CWediting for the suggested guidelines. Please add more Louisiana-related Civil War articles if you have the time and interest! Thanks! Scott Mingus 15:52, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Thanks for the cleanup Scott. It looks much better ! Please feel free to edit anything I submit. Good to know someone found and appreciates Andre Cailloux's story. Mpleahy. September 29, 2006.
:Another kudo or two to ya for this very nice article about an important subject. Good job. BusterD 22:06, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks 

message: The caption on this picture calls into question some of the assertions made in this article. Is Cailloux in the picture, or not? Broichmore (talk) 19:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a painting, not a picture. There are no photos of him. natemup (talk) 12:40, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs checking
Talk:Horst Wessel

message: "The landlady – who may have feared that she could lose them if Jänicke, whom she assumed was a working prostitute, was found to be living there"
What is "lose them" in reference to here? It seems unclear from the article itself. 91.116.34.197 (talk) 21:47, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've clarified that. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:37, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jänicke: What is "lose them" in reference to? 

message: @Beyond My Ken & Immanuelle Setting aside the current content dispute, would you please explain why you reverted my edit changing the image of USCGC Eagle to one of SSS Horst Wessel? Did you just not want to put in the effort to manually revert only one change? It seems appropriate to have a more contemporaneous image of the original vessel which bore Wessel's name, as opposed to one from the 21st century. If you have a different view I'd be happy to discuss it. 47.219.237.179 (talk) 06:56, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't see that image change. I approve of it Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 07:03, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Then can you self-revert/reinstate my edit? Since BMK doesn't want to participate, and you & him are the ones that reverted it then requested the article be locked. 47.219.237.179 (talk) 05:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of SSS Horst Wessel/USCGC Eagle 

message: * D, with apologies to Robert McClenon. These all suffer the same problem: none of them actually mention what he's notable for. I've left an alternative solution in the discussion area below. -- asilvering (talk) 17:37, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: *F (see below) okay with re-write of "the procurer scene". Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:28, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Mr. Natural (character)

message: I removed the following paragraph from the introduction:
It is very strange, and I'm not sure what its purpose is. More importantly, it appears to contradict what the article says about an unauthorized film. ~CS 04:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange intro

message: It seems like quite an omission to list the various uses of the Mr. Natural image and not mention LSD blotter art, such as seen here: http://www.ebay.com/itm/MR-NATURAL-perforated-sheet-BLOTTER-ART-psychedelic-acid-free-paper-/230908582218  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rstinejr (talk • contribs) 18:46, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's kind of humorous that Wikipedia explicitly states this usage was unauthorised. I mean, it makes sense encyclopaedically, but it's rather stating the obvious. Of course, it'll certainly make more sense once LSD is legalised, regulated, and actually able to be produced with licensed artwork.  Xmoogle (talk) 13:24, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Blotter Art?
Talk:Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984

message: This is a link to a commentary on the  Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005: Part 3: Police powers etc. as it effects PACE. It is Crown Copyright material but may assist anyone who would like to expand the article on PACE 1984 Ron Barker 06:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

message: I think that the reference to Osman v DPP under the section Case Law is a reference to  the case of Mustapha Osman v Southwark Crown Court 
See:Rob Jerrard Police Law. I could be wrong so I have not ammended the entry, just in case that I am wrong.
The case report is at: Osman v Southwark Crown Court [1999] EWHC Admin 622 (1st July, 1999)Ron Barker 07:38, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the change of reference, but I am not sure why these particular cases have been singled out. ElectricLemon (talk) 21:04, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: When initially reviewing the article this is included as an example of the importance of PACE in day to day policing. PACE is effectively the rule book that governs Police powers & procedures. The case in question is quite important as there are essential pieces of information to be given at the point of searching. PACE lays these down. What are your thoughts on the article without it? Lukeyboyuk (talk) 04:17, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Case Law - OSMAN 

message: The article has contained a mixture of PACE & Police and Criminal Evidence Act.
The start of the article makes it clear that the acronym PACE represents Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.
I have changed the references to PACE.
Lukeyboyuk (talk) 03:52, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  PACE v Police and Criminal Evidence Act 
Talk:Skylab Rescue

message: Aside from the five documents I have linked to this article, there are three other documents and two pictures related to the SL-R mission on the NTRS. The three documents which are listed but not yet uploaded in PDF form are:
*. Structural analysis Skylab spacecraft. Addendum A: Rescue  vehicle (Document: 19760073027)
*. Skylab rescue space vehicle countdown (Document: 19750016724)
*. Skylab rescue capability (Document: 19720061466)
Graham1973 (talk) 13:58, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The documents relating to the Countdown and Structural analysis have recently become available on the NTRS and have now been linked to the article proper.Graham1973 (talk) 13:41, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Documentation Listed on NTRS

message: "Skylab rescue mission" would seem most logical, after studying sources.  Other opinions? Dicklyon (talk) 04:10, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I think so to, or perhaps "Possible skylab rescue mission" or "Potential skylab rescue mission". Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 04:40, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What should the title be?
Talk:Filbert Street

message: The Carling stand did not make it all-seater, it was the conversion of the Spion Kop to seating which did that.  Can anyone confirm when this happened? Guinness 14:09, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To add to the above, I'm not sure on the order of names in the Infobox. City Business Stadium was the official name from about the mid-90s onwards, yet nobody used that, it was only ever occasionally called the City Stadium and nearly everybody (including the club!) carried on calling it Filbert Street. Wellbutthatcouldbe 19:47, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: All seater
Talk:Kilkenny (horse)

message: Whilst Wofford rode the horse for America the horse was born in Ireland and competed for Ireland many times, should the panel on the left not reflect this as Country Ireland/United States. Greener man 08 (talk) 18:42, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Changed. Laurel Lodged (talk) 12:07, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country
Talk:Web application development

message: Is any of this out of scope? Is anything in scope that isn't included in the article? Is anything too vague? Is anything too detailed? 
DRogers 14:12, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial revision

message: Originally, this was going to be a best practices article. But I don't think I'm qualified to write that. I'd still like to see either a section for best practices, or have the entire article focus on best practices. Any thoughts? 
DRogers 19:21, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Best practices

message: Web Applications are very different from web development in general. Also this article is very helpful in defining the two. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 150.177.196.106 (talk) 20:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  My .02c 

message: The references to McConnel 1996 are wrong.
-Practicing code reuse and using web application frameworks can greatly improve both productivity and time to market (McConnell 1996:537). In that chapter, they do talk about code reuse but not about frameworks. I think it would be better to write:
-Practicing code reuse (McConnell 1996:537) and using web application frameworks can greatly improve both productivity and time to market 
Then in the references section:
-McConnell, Steve (July 2, 1996). Rapid Development. Microsoft Press. p. 680. . the book has only 647 pages, how come the given reference page is 680?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.45.165.46 (talk) 17:12, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Zimbabwe Defence Forces

message: This article lacks Citations of any kind. It is much better to connect the references to the text by adding citations, as it easier to check over the citations, and avoid original research and unverifiable claims. --HandGrenadePins (talk) 09:09, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Summary of 8601 by ISO at the Wayback Machine (archived 2011-06-14) 2806:105E:15:575A:5105:408:E422:CBE6 (talk) 07:38, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free fire
Category talk:2000s British television series

message: Should this category include shows that started in the 90s or earlier but continued into the 2000s. I.e. Top Gear. HornetMike 14:13, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. And in the 1990s cat. --Mais oui! 15:33, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Given that this is on the :Category:2010s British television series page (which has fewer articles in it), and the multiple sub categories available, I thought it was worth adding here. Dunarc (talk) 16:31, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category Difuse
Talk:Air Force of Zimbabwe

message: I removed this link as it appears that the info on that page has changed since it was posted.  If you/we can find the page in archives, I'll gladly restore it.  Or, if I'm mistaken about it supporting the text, please correct me as to where.  thx — Ched :  ?  10:55, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed link 

message: I want to know more about REGIMENT INFANTRY 197.221.253.94 (talk) 02:15, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  REGIMENT INFANTRY
Talk:Wanstead and Woodford (UK Parliament constituency)

message: This article needs changing. and the structure of lists of constituencies needs a re-think.
It seems (not entirely sure) that this constituency was formed after 1965, in which case it should not be described as an Essex or South East constituency. The area is part of the London electoral region and the map of Essex shown on the page is the Non-metropolitan county of Essex (not the Traditional county) and the associated unitary authorites making up the Ceremonal county. None of this area covers what was the Wanstead and Woodford constituency.
:As I have explained in the brief alterations I have made to the article, this constituency has a unique history in that, its name was changed between the 1955 and 1974 redistributions. The boundary change was very minor and did not involve any voters (see Municipal Borough of Wanstead and Woodford). The Woodford and Wanstead & Woodford articles should probably be merged, when we reach the stage of tidying up after every constituency has some article.
:On the county point the change was made in 1964, before the area changed from the administrative county of Essex to Greater London the following year. --Gary J 03:12, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tamluk

message: This is a very uneven article that has a lot of information presented in blocks. It needs to be wikified and cleaned up since there are many grammatical errors too. Also sections need to be consistent with the wikipedia manual. I'll work on it, but please do NOT remove the tags before the work is done. Thanks in advance. --Antorjal 14:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Please do not remove the wikify and cleanup tags until both have been done. What needs to be done is the following:
# A lead paragraph
# A history section (now the whole article is on history)
#economics
#geography and weather
#population and demographics
#media
#CITE references
#copy-editing the whole article because it is replete with grammatical and spelling errors
#There are very few links. That's why I have the wikify tag there too. It just does not coform with the guidelines for the encyclopedia.
Thanks. --Antorjal 13:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is not upto the wikipedia manual please follow WP:INCITIES and WP:MOS. Amartyabag  (Talk)  10:42, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not remove the tags. 

message: I have moved most of the Tamralipta based content to a separate article and wikified the first two sections of this one. I need to do the other remaining sections. Feel free to help but check for grammar, spelling, accuracy, and linking. Thanks. --Antorjal 01:54, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re Tamralipta 

message: Apparently, the forthcoming movie is not about the belief referred to in this article.  Certainly an entertainment would not be a secure basis for the argument made here. Fconaway 07:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bheema

message: The photo of the temple is not from TAMLUK but from Chandannagar, Odisha. Invitrosantanu (talk) 12:31, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong photo.
Talk:Leslie Castle

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lickleyhead_Castle
http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-37523146.html
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place/Lickleyhead+Castle,+Premnay,+Insch,+Aberdeenshire+AB52+6PN/@57.3032048,-2.617998,17z/data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x488448811977ea6b:0x41e6a926880efb97  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.143.203.102 (talk) 10:31, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That seems to be a different castle. -Kj cheetham (talk) 23:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge pls