lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Papa Wemba

message: "But that was just a low time, like some others, in Papa Wemba flamboyant, rocky and creative life. And after every low moment, countless musicians defections and big challenges in his long musical career, Jules Shungu Wembadio alias Papa Wemba has always rebounded."
This sentence isn't very informative and belongs stylistically somewhere else. It also seems to trivialise the horrible crime Papa Wemba was involved in, suggesting that all that matters about it is the effect it has had on his career. I think people who have been victims of human trafficking might find this quite offensive, which is why I've deleted it. Ireneshusband 16:06, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has been reclassified as a start due to level of detail. Capitalistroadster (talk) 10:38, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Reclassified as a start
Talk:Lighter (barge)

message: I was always under the impression that a modern lighter was a type of coaster sized vessel that ferried goods between larger bulk carriers or tankers, offloading in places where the bigger ships cannot dock, either due to depth limitations or maneuverability problems. I'm also led to believe that coastal tankers are of the same breed, some even being ex-oil lighters. If I am correct should this be included in this article or a seperate article?--▫Bad▫harlick♠ 16:12, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can get something to back up your impression, then absolutely add this to the article - the vessels are all fulfilling the same function. But do be careful of wording: there may now be lighters of your description, but this does not mean the older type no longer exists in some countries (esp. non-industrialized). Also, explain coaster sized for us landlubbers? :-) Cheers, look forward to seeing more about the above, JackyR | Talk 19:40, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Climate Stewardship Acts

message: Is this related to the Kyoto Protocol? And how was it killed? (I thought the full Senate voted on it.) 
*The revised version of the bill would require the Administrator of the EPA to promulgate regulations to limit the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the electricity generation, transportation, industrial, and commercial economic sectors (as defined by EPA's Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks).  The affected sectors accounted for approximately 85% of the overall U.S. emissions in the year 2000. The bill also would provide for the trading of emissions allowances and reductions through a National Greenhouse Gas Database which would contain an inventory of emissions and registry of reductions.
**Target: The bill would cap the 2010 aggregate emissions level for the covered sectors at the 2000 level. 
*On October 30, 2003, Senators Joseph I. Lieberman (D-CT) and John McCain (R-AZ) brought a revised version of their Climate Stewardship Act of 2003 (S.139) to a vote in the United States Senate.  ... the measure failed by a vote of 43 to 55 
Let's put this info in the article. --Uncle Ed 16:15, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Apparently these bills share a name with newer legislation introduced by Cory Booker in 116th/117th congress. But the newer bills are very different (they don't have a cap and trade system at all), so they should probably be lumped together with these bills. 〈 Forbes72 | Talk 〉 21:17, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential shared name confusion
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/The Blind King

message: Updated discography, interviews, awards, misc other links.  More to come... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ultrajosh (talk • contribs) 
:Thanks. I've reviewed the changes and I've now changed my recommendation to keep. (Also, don't forget to sign your talk page comments with four tildas like this: ~~~~). Akradecki 16:23, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Edgar Cunningham

message: *http://www.westtexasscoutinghistory.net/award_eaglepage.html
--evrik 20:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm working to get photos we can use. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 14:30, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: I am in contact with Cunningham's grand-daughter.  She is working to help us expand and improve this article, including photos.  I just have to work out the original research policy. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 14:30, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: article is linked on the List of Notable Eagles Scouts.  Skiendog (talk) 18:37, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  taking down orphan status
Talk:Cauchy–Euler equation

message: The article states that the Cauchy-Euler equation only applies to second order differential equations, but in reality it can be applied to equations of higher order as well.  I'm not very good with TeX as yet, so if someone else has the wherewithal to fix it more quickly, I'd appreciate it, otherwise I'll work on it when I can. siafu 16:18, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I generalized the definition. MathMartin 15:10, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Higher order

message: Can this topic show up in a search for "Euler equation" or "Euler Differential Equation" since that's what we called it at our University, and finding it using just Euler was not as easy as it should have been.  Maybe a redirect?  84.59.50.72 10:40, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Increase Visibility

message: According to http://www.fiu.edu/~aladrog/CauchyEuler.pdf, Cauchy-Euler equation not only represents the homogeneous one x^n y^{(n)}(x) + a_{n-1} x^{n-1} y^{(n-1)}(x) + \cdots + a_0 y(x) = 0, but also the inhomogeneous one x^n y^{(n)}(x) + a_{n-1} x^{n-1} y^{(n-1)}(x) + \cdots + a_0 y(x) = f(x). But the article only tells the homogeneous one. This is not enough. I think this article should add more for the inhomogeneous one.Doraemonpaul (talk) 21:14, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[homogeneous]]<nowiki> vs </nowiki>[[inhomogeneous]]
Talk:Ford Landau

message: This is to welcome everyone interested in exchanging info about the Ford Landau.
Greetings
--Vee8 16:19, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the past few weeks an anonymous user has repeatedly added unverified information (factory location, color availability of the model) to this article, which I have repeatedly reverted. Wikipedia policy requires reliable secondary or tertiary sources, as stated in WP:NOR and WP:RS. Please stick to Wikipedia policy. Enumerating each particular color of the car model is also of debatable significance. The offending user repeatedly blanks warnings from his talk page, offends other editors in edit summaries and has a history of disruptive edits in other articles. Fbergo (talk) 17:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repeated addition of ill-formatted unsourced information
Talk:1430s

message: Please consider the following changes to words on the map:
*Scandavinavian --> Scandinavian
*Moscovy --> Muscovy
*Genovese --> Genoese
**("Genoese" is more common than "Genovese", and "Genovese" can be confused with "Genevese".)
*Duke of Burgandy --> Duchy of Burgundy
:(Please see list of adjectival forms of place names.)
Please consider changing the black font to a font which is easier to read.
Wavelength 16:21, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to words on map
Talk:OldVersion.com

message: That whole Advantages/disadvantages thing is BS to me. The site offers old programs, and people looking for old programs usually have old versions of Windows anyways. If you're running XP then either your computer is powerful enough or you need an older OS anyways. Not to mention Windows XP has that whole compatibility mode thing (I don't use XP so i don't know how it works or its effectiveness).
I'm gonna attempt a rewrite Mr toasty 20:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: well while that may be true, there are plenty of people who don't like the most recent editions of software. I, for example, had tried the AIM 6.0 for two months and soon began disliking it. So I went to Oldversion.com and downgraded to AIM 5.9 (which i think is better, much simpler). olversion was very helpful to me. Arc88 23:10, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: XD, I'm all for oldversion, it helped me as well. I just think the article casts a very negative spin on it. Mr toasty 00:37, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is rediculous 

message: I believe that the article (on 2007-03-03) had “insulted” my computer which I by no means call legacy hardware and yet it is running most of the software others would call obsolete. By writing these paragraphs I tried to show some other reasons why it would be beneficial to run older versions of software. Switching barriers at Wikipedia had some good reading, but it was more about technology in general. I feel in great debt to any people who have made available these previous versions for download, often disregarding the EULAs of specific products. Please don't delete this section from the Talk page.  -- 83.99.184.75 18:32, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other possible reasons why to visit OldVersion 

message: Old versions are very important bcz of many reasons. I need old version as security analyst & cyber expert. Its great to find legacy software. New releases don't allow certain codes & scripts which is very important for big companies where security is of primary concern. I just wonder is it free from spyware? Any update on malware infected downloads? At a first glance this seeems to be legit & free from malware to me.    — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.72.11.10 (talk) 12:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: You call yourself a « security analyst & cyber expert » and you're not sure if they're clean ? Feh. --Moira 142.113.73.240 (talk) 15:25, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it GUD 

message: Alex Levine (born about 1990) of Fayetteville, New York founded the site in 2001.
When he was 11? Any source? Flapdragon (talk) 12:32, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That caught my eye, too.  I've removed the "Born about 1990" piece until we can et confirmation (which isn't likely, IMO). — EagleOne\Talk 18:13, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

text: The 2006 WSJ cite lists Alex's age as 16, so the math works out. --Lexein (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 16:09, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  pecocious webmaster
Talk:Forty Green, Penn

message: If you search for "forty green" on maps.google.co.uk, it takes you to a place near Chinnor with outward postcode HP27. Should this be noted on the page in case any confusion arises? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.74.241 (talk) 16:25, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well spotted ! It seems you are right - there is an even smaller hamlet of the same name that is just inside the Buckinghamshire border. Does this therefore require disambiguation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proteus4 (talk • contribs) 09:43, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential for confusion
Talk:Rabi ibn Sabra

message: Are you sure everything in the article is in Tahdhib al-Tahdhib? I dont want to attribute info that is not in the book to the book, and i don't have the book. Please be more methodical with referencing, and put fact tags on unreferenced information. --Striver 12:14, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, everything in the article is in Tahdhib al-Tahdhib. --Islamic 04:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Anal sac adenocarcinoma

message: attempted to edit out vandalism from 7/2/9 describing this as a human condition.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.192.20.236 (talk) 17:58, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  anal sac adenocarcinoma not a human disease 

message: This is a suggestion that this article should be merged with Perianal gland tumor or vice versa. --TerrorBite (talk) 03:00, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 
Category talk:Comics characters

message: The name of this list seems a little silly.  Do "comic book characters" need to be referred to as specifically "fictional"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.123.129.140 (talk) 06:24, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Given the number of articles in this category, should it lose its container status? Dunarc (talk) 22:59, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Container category?
Talk:Scottish Division

message: "Balaclava Company" of the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders continued as an independent unit from 20 January 1971 until the regiment was restored to full battalion size on 17 January 1972. Is this a 'past unit'? Shipsview (talk) 14:45, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Any thoughts? Shipsview (talk) 09:08, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Balaclava Company

message: The article indicates that two former divisional bands, the Highland Band and the Lowland Band now form the the regimental Band of the Royal Regiment of Scotland.  However, the MOD site appears to indicate that the Highland Band is still in existence. Some clarification of the situation would be welcome Shipsview (talk) 09:08, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: The Highland Band

message: Do you provide buglers for black watch Korean War veterans? Also watch costs are incurred? 95.144.52.129 (talk) 15:37, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do you provide buglers for black watch Korean War veterans funerals? And what costs would be incurred ?
Talk:Florida State Road 55

message: What does secret designation mean?  Is there a page that explains that we can link to? - Peregrine Fisher 20:30, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A secret designation is basically used by the DOT and other agencies for internal purposes.  RARELY do secret designations show up on maps or signs.  However, with SR 55, the designation has shown up on several maps over the years.  Another example of a secret designation is SR 400, which is the designation used for Interstate 4. 71.99.214.105 01:21, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You could go to Unsigned highway.  Allen (talk) 20:18, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Secret designation

message: What is the difference between dab1, dab2, dab3, etc.?  Did it really matter that you changed the dab that I used?  Allen (talk) 20:19, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: "dab1" is for the first shield. The one with the banner is the third. ----DanTD (talk) 20:22, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It worked before you changed it.  Allen (talk) 20:24, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No it didn't. It gave the impression that US 19 was the one with the banner. It was actually US 27. ----DanTD (talk) 20:29, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I just looked at the history of the page.  I knew the US 27 ALT was fine.  I didn't see that US 19 was messed up.  Allen (talk) 20:57, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You may not have seen it, but when converted it to the template(which I applaud you doing), you changed the link of U.S. Route 19 in Florida to U.S. Route 19 in Williston-Perry, Florida. I've made mistakes like this before, and so have other editors. ----DanTD (talk) 21:10, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the Difference in Dabs? 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Alpha Kappa Nu (second nomination)

message: - :Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Kappa Nu   
- Alpha Kappa Nu was deleted as an attack page. It appears that this article describes a dispute with Alpha Phi Alpha as to which is the oldest Black fraternity. However, I don't believe that makes this article an attack page. Alpha kappa nu (note capitalization) was recreated, not exactly the same article. I have moved it to Alpha Kappa Nu for now. —Quarl (talk) 2006-09-24 21:06Z   
    
*comment: by definition "Articles that serve no purpose but to disparage their subject or some other entity (e.g., "John Q. Doe is an imbecile"). This includes a biography of a living person that is negative in tone and unsourced, where there is no NPOV version in the history to revert to." It doesn't fit the standards of an attack page. Mykungfu 23:43, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Alpha Kappa Nu]]

message: This article should be deleted on the speculative nature (POV) of the references provided and the author’s further misquoting of these references.  Alpha Kappa Nu has been out of existence for 100 years. The only authentic proof of its existence at all is the picture provided. Membership roster and bios can be deduced by this picture, if one is desirous to labor in that original research.
However, and of the utmost importance, since there’s no written documentation to be found anywhere in the form of a Constitution, preamble, or mission statement, it’s speculative to conclude whether or not Alpha Kappa Nu was a club, society, fraternity, exclusive membership based on race, gender, or social status, academic, social, or service oriented (“strengthen the Negro voice at the city and the university”? Says who?), or otherwise. Presenting any such evidence as 100% fact on this or any other site, as well as any and all journal and newspaper publications provided as sources or in the making, should be avoided.
I whole-heartedly support deletion in its entirety. 
Adisalee 16:53, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 
This article should be deleted because NinjaNubian/MyKungfu is using multiple IPs to endorse keep  for article and terrorising Alpha Phi Alpha and Alpha Kappa Alpha.  Bearly541 02:07, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's try to keep the tone civil around here. Also, Mykungfu's actions have no bearing on whether the article should or should not be kept. This is a referendum (of sorts) on the article, not on MKF. | Mr. Darcy talk 18:10, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete
Talk:Car Babes

message: More coming soon...I promise!
trezjr 16:57, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More coming... 

message: Ya, I am aware the movie has been called both Car Babes and CarBabes.
Initial talk had it as Car Babes and now early promotion materials say CarBabes.
The film has not yet been picked up for distribution--and things happen--so let's leave the name like it is for now, but feel free to make your feelings known here on this page.
When I get news on pick-up, there's still plenty of time to change it. The film will most likely not be in general distribution until some time in 2007.
trezjr 10:20, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discuss name change 

message: Citations...to follow.
trezjr 11:24, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: Just a word about some of the name differences listed here as compared to, say the Internet Movie Database.
I am getting film information as soon as it is posted, so it is the most accurate and up to date anywhere on the internet.  Any changes that occur are listed here usually within 24-hours.
trezjr 23:56, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact differences
Talk:I-933 (Washington)

message: hi! i think MackenzieB is off to a great start with this entry. i have restructured it to conform with the wiki MOS and have tried to clarify and clean up some elements of the writing. i have basically left MackenzieB's satements about eminent domain as is, but I think they need further clarification and citation. Benzocane 17:00, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:162 (number)

message: Since when has the highest point score using three darts, in darts been 162. Surely the highest point score is 180? If whom ever wrote that, or anybody for that matter, can provide a source then please revert back, but for now I'm afraid that I'm going to remove it. Nmdale (talk) 20:08, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Darts]]

message: A recent removal of the MLB statistic by The Storm Surfer  said "MLB comment removed; see talk" in regards to why it was removed.  But, this talk page says nothing about it except for the elementary quote from above, which is not what was just recently removed.  That was removed a long time ago.  The following is the statement that was just removed, and I intend to reinsert it unless someone an provide a better explanation for its removal:
:162 is the number of games each team plays during a regular season in Major League Baseball.
It is pretty straightforward.  It clearly does not refer to the minor leagues, little leagues, or anything other than the MLB.  It links to "regular season" to intentionally exclude pre- and post-season games, but perhaps it should link to the non-disambiguated Major League Baseball season.  Therefore,  I made the change and added it back to the article.  There is no reason to provide a source for this information; it's almost on the verge of common knowledge that MLB seasons are 162 games and have been for a really long time. —№tǒŖïøŭş4lĭfė ♫♪
::What Storm Surfer removed was rather vague. What you put in addressed all the concerns that Anton had with the original statement (see above). And no, it's not common knowledge that an MLB season has 162 games for each team. Our national pastime has declined in popularity. Maybe we could find it in the MLB rulebook something that says 162 or some easily calculable expression for 162. CompositeFan 19:35, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Defending the inclusion of the MLB season
Talk:Noovo

message: I disagree with writing TQS as 'tqs', from what I've seen on the website, they still use capital letters except on the logo.  Will change this unless someone can provide some sources to back up the no-capitals usage.  209.105.207.181 17:02, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd have to concur; the logo isn't necessarily demonstrative of what's official usage. Bearcat 00:47, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:   Have changed to uppercase on this page as well as List of programs broadcast by tqs.  However, I can't rename the titles, and don't know how to change the infoboxes at the bottom of these two pages that still have lowercase.  Any helpers?  209.105.207.181 22:44, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Dear Wikipedia
 
 I read the information on the following page and noticed a small mistake.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_(TV_network)
 
 
 *************************************************************
 Remstar's takeover and rebranding of the network
 On March 10, 2008, the Quebec Supreme Court approved the sale of
 TQS to Remstar Corporation, a Montreal-based television and film producer and
 distributor.[4]Creditors, who were owed more than $33
 million, voted to accept the Remstar proposal in May.[5]The CRTC approved the
application on June 26, 2008.[6][7]
 *****************************************************************
 
 
There is no Quebec Supreme Court in Quebec; it is probably a typo error. Please
research and replace with either Quebec Superior Court or Supreme Court of Canada, located in Ottawa.
 
 No offense and nothing major.
 
 Regards
 
 
 Bruno Gazaille  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.88.18.69 (talk) 02:17, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is no Quebec Supreme Court in Quebec 

message: Noovo is certainly phonetically correct in English to represent the pronunciation of "nouveau"... but are the French pronounciations of those vowels also consistent?  I don't think I've ever seen double-Oh in a French word.  It sounds fishily English. GBC (talk) 19:50, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phonetic?  Noovo?