lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of antiretroviral fixed-dose combinations

message: :Kaletra® = lopinavir (for its HIV protease enzyme inhibition) with ritonavir included to boost serum levels of lopinavir through inhibition of CYP3A4, a liver enzyme that metabolizes many other substances. The FDA approved it September 15, 2000, making it the seventeenth approved antiretroviral drug. It is the first multi-drug capsule that contains a drug not available individually. It has been demonstrated to be extremely potent and is often used in 'salvage' therapy for patients with some level of drug resistance. Some studies have suggested Kaletra is potent enough to be used as monotherapy and is also suitable for once-daily dosing, although neither is currently recommended. Marketed by Abbott Laboratories, its patent will expire in the United States on 2016-06-26. 
Most of the above paragraph has been removed from this article as lopinavir has separate page. Some of this information has been transferred to the lopinavir page, but the unreferenced statements (here boldened) have been omitted until references can be provided. Espresso Addict 21:16, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Material on Kaletra

message: Need to check that currently only available in USA. Espresso Addict 21:20, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atripla
Talk:Founder Group

message: Copied from official site. Sept.29 2006 by Leon
----
thanks for admitting it was copied from the company's website, but that's not how wikipedia works. As of right now, this reads like sloppy PR. These are the longest wikipedia paragraphs I've even seen. maybe someone can find the Mandarin version of this wikipedia page, and come up with a decent translation of it? --kipito 00:50, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Ernest Earl Lockhart

message: Place hangon tag while searching for information to substantiate claim of south pole explorer and mountain named after him.--Gay Cdn  (talk) (email) (Contr.) 21:21, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Thanks for retrieving the references. I have reworked the text and added them, as well as the missing one about the antarctic mountain. Nehwyn 22:27, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision completed
Talk:Dignāga

message: * http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&newwindow=1&q=%C4%80lambana-par%C4%ABk%E1%B9%A3%C4%81&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws
* http://buddhism.lib.ntu.edu.tw/BDLM/toModule.do?prefix=/search&page=/search_detail.jsp?seq=145578
--222.67.204.113 (talk) 05:10, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The reasons for the red links 

message: * http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=Vin%C4%ABtadeva&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--222.67.204.113 (talk) 05:18, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The reason for the red link in the ''see also'' section... 

message: "Therefore the example premise above, "all dogs are mammals" becomes "all non-mammals are non-dogs." These two statements are logically equivalent. "
The statements are not equivalent within the traditional logic systems of the sub-continent as those systems explicitly reject the law of the excluded middle.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.220.106.207 (talk) 13:15, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  When is a dog not a mammal? 
Talk:Charles Windolph

message: In the text and info box there are two different places named Bergen (Bergen an der Dumme and Bergen near Celle). But he married a childhood friend from Isle of Rugen so may be he was born in Bergen auf Rügen and ist not one of People in Celle. Okernick (talk) 07:43, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of birth
Talk:Ornithomancy

message: There should be at least some mention that the word "augury" is the roman word for ornithomancy...
I tightened up and fleshed out this article a bit today.  I included the Greek word and added a Biblical citation.  This helps to widen the scope of the article, but more explicit references to ornithomancy should be collected.  This article is in danger of being little more than a lame copy of the article on Augury, so constant vigilence is needed if the two are to remain differentiated. PeterMottola (talk) 19:04, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Albanian Air Force

message: Hi i would like to know where User:77.242.24.253 & User:Noclador are getting these claims and presenting them as facts with no source what so ever on the current flying status of the aircraft in the Albanian ai force & User:Noclador for some reason claims I'm committing vandalism and removing User:217.24.241.70 edits when in fact I did not touch any thing he added and does not conflict with any of his edits as you can see on the following link.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Albanian_Air_Force&diff=177514353&oldid=177443334
80.80.161.147 (talk) 14:00, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:   Aircraft Flying Status 

message: What is the significance of a second heading for pictures?  Couldn't these pictures be appended to the Gallery.  They do not always have the year associated with the picture anyway.--User:Brenont (talk) 23:14, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albanian Air Force in years 

message: If anyone has the possibility to upload new images and respect the author rights please do so. There are plenty new pictures on the web as well as on the official page of the Albanian Armed Forces but i am not sure how to proceed with the rights as required by Wikipedia. Thank you! €uropedian (talk) 16:57, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New images/pictures 

message: The addition by the IP beginning with 85. are outdated (i.e. "New fighter aircraft are not planned to be purchased until 2010", "the MoD has specified that after 2006 attack helicopters will enter service with the AAF"... decade old claims that did not come true!) and also bogus (i.e. 148x Yakovlev Yak-11 basic trainers) and the links to sources lead just to the main page of the Albanian Armed Forces or in one instance to the career page of the Albanian Armed Forces  site. In short: this edits are a either jokes or vandalism. noclador (talk) 20:12, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  changes by IP 

message: The changes by user abdullahu are correct . Here is the link to the military of albania > http://www.aaf.mil.al/index.php/armatimet-e-pajisjet/1643-pajisjet-forca-ajrore 
The helicopter inventory shown there does not include 3 helicopters used by the ministry of internal affairs of Albania ( the Mi Mi soviet era helicopter , and the Augusta 109  etc. ) , and 2 used by the ministry of health afairs ( for transportation etc. ) . However we can agree , that 90 % of the aircraft inventory added by user abdullahu is in the source i presented here .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gjirokastra15 (talk • contribs) 17:09, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  changes by Abdullahu
Talk:Thomas Baker (Medal of Honor recipient)

message: This article pretty much needs to be expanded "on all fronts".  Until then, it's a stub
----
If he was killed on Saipan, Marianas, that pretty much rules him out for having been involved in the later Philippine campaign....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.163.7.98 (talk) 03:22, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating

message: I don't think they used greek letter names.  Formal title would be Company A.  If a word was used for A it would be Able.  Not sure about thatt.
Peter Reilly (talk) 22:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Alpha

message: The hyperlink for William J O'Brien is the wrong one, it currently goes to a U.S. Senator but it should be the one here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_J._O'Brien_(Medal_of_Honor_recipient). I'll try to fix this later after I figure out how to do stuff on Wikipedia.
XieYuhuan (talk) 06:53, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Honors
Talk:Another Lady Innocent

message: For the last two day, I tried to place an infobox for this article.  And for two days straight, the results were such that I had to erase my efforts, because all I got was an odd mismash at the top of the article.  Can anyone please properly place an infobox in the article so that I can input some information? BiggKwell 21:36, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Supposedly the first episode was too expensive for the production company to order more, probably because Urushihara tends to draw most of the keyframes himself. Herr Gruber (talk) 05:14, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems with adding an infobox

message: Good Hentai Kawaiichan104 (talk) 08:06, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Lady Innocent 
Talk:Aslim Taslam

message: The Jerusalem Post can be considered a reliable source on current events and happenings. However, since when is this newspaper an expert on historical concepts of any kind? Can someone provide some sort of reasoning that suggests this.Bless sins (talk) 04:24, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jerusalem Post

message: Why is this article here? What is the significant thing about "Aslim Taslam"? 
This is fairly uncommon phrase in the Arabic/Islamic culture. Most Arab/Muslims have never even heard it before. I demand the deletion of this article for the lack of any significance or point. HD1986 (talk) 04:46, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the point from this article?
Talk:Luna Park (play)

message: Based on the googling I've done, I don't think this play meets the Wikipedia:Notability guidelines.  It appears to have been performed once, at the high school for which it was commissioned, and have had an unstaged reading or two elsewhere.  I can find no professional critical reviews, and a dead link to the school's own newsletter's review.  If no reliable, third-party, published sources surface, this article might become a candidate for deletion or merge with Caridad_Svich.
*http://www.centerstage.org/page.php?pageID=381
*Reisner Newton, Edith. "Luna Park." Rev. of Luna Park, by Caridad Svich. JagWire: The International High School Parent Newsletter. http://www.fais-ihs.org/arts/luna_article.html. 30 Jan. 2005. 
*http://cnjerseystages.blogspot.com/2007/03/and-away-we-go.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dereksmootz (talk • contribs) 
::I think when I originally created the article, you would have been correct that it didn't meet notability requirements. However, it has since been performed by Equity actors, albeit only as a staged reading, but that is still something notable, at least in my opinion. (There are no established notability requirements for plays, as far as I know, so we just have to go off the general requirements.) I've found this source as well. Granted, the sources are not print sources, but the notability requirement specifically makes the point that the sources need not be a specific medium. A published source is defined as one that is made available to the public, whether through a website, newspaper, academic journal, or some other medium.
::Yes, it's a tough call, but I think the play just barely meets the notability requirements. Of course, I'm a little biased, having created the article, but I'll be first to admit that it didn't meet the requirements when I created it! -- Cielomobile talk / contribs 01:55, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagged for notability
Talk:Austrian Air Force

message: As of 2019 there is no separate Austrian Air Force anymore, and it has since been reformed into the Aviation Branch of the Austrian Army. I therefore propose merging this article with the Article of the Austrian Army.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krustycheese (talk • contribs) 10:02, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Lighting control system

message: To tidy the list of companies will be hard as any efforts could be accused of bias.
I think the best way is to focus on their traditional markets sectors ("me too" is rife in this market), whether they are distributed or not and the scale they can run to (whether they are best suited to large medium or small automation).
Perhaps all of this in a comparison table. --Back ache 21:47, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tidying list of companies

message: I suggest merging the two articles, since both articles concern themselves with lighting control systems, and there is a large degree of overlap. The Lighting control system article seems more established and has more links to other languages, and is a much more descriptive article than "Smart lighting" in my opinion.Sauer202 (talk) 09:18, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: "Smart cant be used in everything" A control system defines a wide domain, but Smart Lighting define a focussed domain. Smart Lighting can be referred to as a lighting system that can adapt according to people behaviour or having at least one feedback system to improve the control system itself. On the other hand, Lighting Control can be of anything even a switch that just turns ON and OFF the light is a control mechanism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AayushBista (talk • contribs) 05:37, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I still disagree. "Smart lighting" currently seems to be used as a buzz word for any form of lighting control. Smart lighting does not necessarily imply automated lighting control. An example of what I would call non-automated "smart lighting" would be to use an app on a phone to control a light instead of using a physical switch on the wall, or to use a wireless dimmer. Your understanding of smart lighting however seems to be in line with Lighting control system#Automated control based on occupancy sensors. The smart lighting article currently defines smart lighting as "a lighting technology designed for energy efficiency, convenience and security". This is essentially equivalent to saying "an energy efficient and convenient lighting control" (which seems to be two identical definitions, except for the security part, which should always be an obvious non-functional requirement anyways). Sauer202 (talk) 07:52, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested merging of Smart lighting into Lighting control
Talk:Stone Island

message: Are you sure Stone Island is a luxury brand? How do you know? 5.90.8.229 (talk) 20:21, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Stone Island really a luxury brand? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jmmaxwell (talk) 18:08, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ARH 371_The TransAtlantic_Cross-Cultural Representations
Talk:Daniel Hand High School

message: Basically, it is full of schoolcruft. Removed some vandalism that slipped in here, and the mainpage. Low importance, little ascertation of notability, and stub class for the total lack of encyclopedic knowledge. Twenty Years 14:23, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: It would be interesting to know from where the school took its name.  Who is "Daniel Hand"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.119.76.228 (talk) 22:46, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Hand_Touch_Football_League Just was curious can you save National Hand Touch Football League Daniel Hand Football inspired me to create a league of Hand Football. Demons24 (talk) 19:05, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Hand Touch Football League
Talk:Alberta Arts District (Portland, Oregon)

message: The article fails to mention a lot of GLBT, mainly lesbians, live in the Alberta district. If anybody has a problem with my adding mention of this to the article, explain why, otherwise I'm adding it eventually. --RyanTee82 (talk) 07:12, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a problem, but it needs to be cited using reliable sources (that is, it can't be original research), and only if you think it's as notable as, say, Burnside Triangle. Maybe Just Out has done a piece on the area? Katr67 (talk) 07:19, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GLBT...Well, mostly L
Talk:Elsie Ivancich Dunin

message: This laudatory article was written by her daughter.  A similar entreaty chronicles her dad's endeavors and the most congratulatory of the trilogy crescendos in the daughter's own achievements.  This fails noteworthyness, references and many other criteria. Recommend deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.230.134.55 (talk • contribs) 
:Please cite the proper notability rules that this article violates so that a proper consensus can be reached. EVula 13:32, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More of the Dunin Trilogy 

message: This has some information that is probably worth including in the article:
*  
--Elonka 02:52, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional source

message: In Croatian, but can be easily translated. One of the factoids here is "one of the founders of dance ethnology in the USA". https://dulist.hr/citaonica-u-lazaretima-obogacena-je-mnostvom-zanimljivih-i-vaznih-djela/734743/?fbclid=IwAR2A_4kenxvNozESMN8EA7znoYx7QOPIxk36OtGRrx9OndZm6JskvHKvvrQ --Elonka 19:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another source
Talk:Upper Abkhazia

message: I would suggest to delete the whole Wikipedia article "Upper Abkhazia", because this naming was created my the Georgian government. After the re-occupation of Kodori gorge by Abkhazian forces, this area is re-integrated into Abkhazia. That's why, there's no connection between Georgia and "Upper Abkhazia" anymore.
Hoping for an answer, an admin could do this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattiabonasso (talk • contribs) 13:10, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Rownhams services

message: The current  AfD is part of a suggestion  to  have  50+ Motorway Service Station articles removed from  the Wkipedia although  many  were kept by  consensus on  earlier AfD debates. See:
*User_talk:Raeky#AfD_Motorway__service_stations
*Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Norton_Canes_services_(2nd_nomination)
--Kudpung (talk) 14:02, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New AfD
Talk:Stafford services

message: The current  AfD is part of a suggestion  to  have  50+ Motorway Service Station articles removed from  the Wkipedia although  many  were kept by  consensus on  earlier AfD debates. See:
*User_talk:Raeky#AfD_Motorway__service_stations
*Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Norton_Canes_services_(2nd_nomination)
--Kudpung (talk) 13:06, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New AfD
Talk:Charnock Richard MSA

message: The current  AfD is part of a suggestion  to  have  50+ Motorway Service Station articles removed from  the Wkipedia although  many  were kept by  consensus on  earlier AfD debates. See:
*User_talk:Raeky#AfD_Motorway__service_stations
*Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Norton_Canes_services_(2nd_nomination)
--Kudpung (talk) 13:04, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New AfD 

message: I think that the map on this article should be made smaller in my opinion as its current size is misaligning the text. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 10:06, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map misaligning the text?
Talk:Lancaster (Forton) Services

message: The current  AfD is part of a suggestion  to  have  50+ Motorway Service Station articles removed from  the Wkipedia although  many  were kept by  consensus on  earlier AfD debates. See:
*User_talk:Raeky#AfD_Motorway__service_stations
*Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Norton_Canes_services_(2nd_nomination)
--Kudpung (talk) 13:04, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD 
Talk:Southwaite Services

message: The current  AfD is part of a suggestion  to  have  50+ Motorway Service Station articles removed from  the Wkipedia although  many  were kept by  consensus on  earlier AfD debates. See:
*User_talk:Raeky#AfD_Motorway__service_stations
*Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Norton_Canes_services_(2nd_nomination)
--Kudpung (talk) 13:04, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Car leasing

message: The article has been revised to be non biased. Please re-review it. The example of how to calculate a lease is also given, but I can edit out the name BMW to appear even more non biased or use another car as an example.
:Still reads like original research. Needs to be completely rewritten, citing sources. An encyclopedia article is essentially a summary of information from other publications and sources, not a how-to manual. Akradecki 22:07, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Léon Walras

message: "To find equilibrium Walras set up a series of experiments called tâtonnement, or groping. Walras simulated groping by calling out prices and people responding how much they would supply or demand at that price, the price was adjusted until equilibrium was reached." I might be wrong, but I think this is false. Sources? -- Typewritten 22:06, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Experiments in tatônnement 

message: Pointers here may help establish sources for the article.  
http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/profiles/walras.htm
71.131.181.105 23:07, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Was his view of land really like the Fabians, or was it more akin to the physiocrats, classical liberals, and georgists who argue for full annual Land Value Taxation?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.73.117 (talk) 19:46, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationalization of land 

message: This site has a picture which is supposedly him at an older age http://www.nndb.com/people/549/000031456/ CrocodilesAreForWimps (talk) 06:01, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another picture 

message: I provided a full bibliographic treatement of the Éléments. It previously had 3 entries in the list of works under different titles/dates/translations. Given the confusion which can arise, it seemed worth trying to be precise (but I may have gone overboard).
I corrected the entries for a couple of other works and deleted ‘Le noble Walrus’ which I assume to be a hoax. I also deleted the image of the title page of the Théorie mathématique on the grounds that an image of the Éléments is more relevant and two is too many, but I preserve the old image here as a reminder. Colin.champion (talk) 08:23, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Petticoat Junction

message: Janet Craig is a historical figure in the history of television, it seems she was only the second woman doctor role (especially as a major recurring character) on American television (from 1968-1970) (see New York Times article. Bettye Ackerman's "Dr. Maggie Graham" on "Ben Casey" was the first (1961-1966). Perhaps the Craig article-content could have been transferred to this article with attribution but maybe I am mistaken about the redirect etc. - let's discuss. Shearonink (talk) 05:10, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Replied at redirects for discussion board. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 17:26, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 22:50, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent redirect of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dr._Janet_Craig&diff=prev&oldid=926983365 Dr. Janet Craig] to [[Petticoat Junction]] 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dr. Janet Craig. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Shearonink (talk) 16:00, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dr. Janet Craig" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: This seems to be one of the rare old TV shows with no criticism sections. Odd, that.71.63.160.210 (talk) 17:22, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing
Talk:Heston MSA

message: The current  AfD is part of a suggestion  to  have  50+ Motorway Service Station articles removed from  the Wkipedia. See:
*User_talk:Raeky#AfD_Motorway__service_stations
*Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Norton_Canes_services_(2nd_nomination)
--Kudpung (talk) 12:59, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD 
Talk:Reading services

message: The current  AfD is part of a suggestion  to  have  50+ Motorway Service Station articles removed from  the Wkipedia although  some of them may have been kept  on  consensus from  prevous AfDs. See:
*User_talk:Raeky#AfD_Motorway__service_stations
*Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Norton_Canes_services_(2nd_nomination)
--Kudpung (talk) 12:58, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New AfD 