lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rule of reason

message: Isnt this related to the above mentioned EU case and not this US one?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.230.11.132 (talk) 10:37, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rule of reason and Cassis de Dijon case 

message: To author or other users please fix these links!!!!--Peace237 22:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Links 

message: I'm far from an antitrust law expert, but doesn't the Supreme Court's decision in Leegin v. PSKS the other day change what this article says about resale price maintenance?  Can someone who knows more about this change the article? --Velvet elvis81 16:12, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leegin v. PSKS 

message: The first two paragraphs of the History section appear to be in a bit of a mess at the moment. I am wary of editing it since I know nothing about the subject. 
The opening phrase "Upon its development" implies that we are dealing with the reaction to Addyston in 1899, but it quickly becomes apparent that we are actually dealing with Standard Oil in 1911. The text seems to imply that Justice Harlan dissented from the majority opinion in Standard Oil, which he did not. The second paragraph purports to be continuing the discussion of the first (with its opening "Others" presumably answering "some critics"), but it is even more anachronistic, since Robert Bork is one of the commentators it mentions (he was born in 1927). We are told that "much language in Trans-Missouri Freight was dicta", but this is unrevealing since there is no discussion of that case. 
JBritnell (talk) 20:53, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Andries Stockenström

message: Those Duminy quotes will have to go, or be extensively rewritten: the de Kock and Krüger Dictionary of South African Biography is 1970s - well within copyright. Text for redraft appended. Tearlach 19:55, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: The family section here is pretty extensive. I think each family member perhaps rates a sentence or so here with each prominent one linked to a separate page.Gallador (talk) 16:51, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Family Section Suggests Separate Articles

message: Man 102.249.2.200 (talk) 18:21, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andries stockenstrom
Talk:Włocławek

message: If you look at the German version, you can see that this page has some problems. For example, the Nazis did not create the name of Leslau--it was given to the German part of the town in the 13th century when it received a city charter with rights according to the Laws of Kulm. The Nazis merely made Leslau the official name of the town from 1940 to 1945. Many interesting ethnic German personalities were born there, such as Marie Sivers, the wife of Rudolf Steiner, founder of Waldorf Schools.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.10.180.192 (talk) 19:10, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

message: B-class review failed, this article is missing key sections (ex. economy) and inline citations (entire sections unreferenced). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  16:22, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review failed

message: I started to edit this article, mostly English. So far, i Know it needs more work, but things can't be done at once, people have only so much time. Please, don't remove sections which need citations, instead include notice "citation needed' if you see someone is working on it.This alerts the editor that of course, the part needs sources, but give time.The Jewish Community section was edited as yesterday, and already was removed. I will restore it to the history section. Maybe the editor who wrote this section may provide some sources?--Bialosz (talk) 03:00, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Please, don't remove information in haste

message: Włocławek districts[edit]
Michelin
Południe (South)
Rybnica
Śródmieście (City Centre)
Wschód Leśny (East Forest area)
Wschód Mieszkaniowy (East Residential area), a.k.a. Dzielnica Wschód (Eeast District)
Wschód Przemysłowy (East Industrial area), a.k.a. Dzielnica Wschód (Eeast District)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.170.88.72 (talk) 06:57, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spel: Wschód Mieszkaniowy (East Residential area), a.k.a. Dzielnica Wschód (Eeast District) should that be "East" ?
Talk:Adriaan Vlok

message: I am trying to expand this article, mainly focusing on the differences between this book and other accounts (books and otherwise) of South Africa throughout this period. Any comments or suggestions are appreciated on the talk page.BillMasen 13:26, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Mandela: The Authorised Biography]]
Talk:Sir David Graaff, 1st Baronet

message: Discussion is at Graaff Baronets. - Kittybrewster  (talk) 06:30, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of the surname

message: See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
:Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
Therefore this articles name should be changed.--Ginggangsgoolies 20:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: Am I reading the info incorrectly or what? To me it seems as if he was knighted in 1911 for services rendered during WW1 and in 1919. Mieliestronk (talk) 20:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Problem still not resolved:
In the intro we have this sentence:
During World War I he personally part financed the South African war effort and for this he was knighted as well as for services at the Paris Peace Conference 1919. 
In "Public service and political career (1882-1897)" we read:
... the Graaff Electric Lighting works ... power station was erected near the Molteno reservoir on Table Mountain. The Graaff part of the name refers to David Pieter de Villers-Graaff (created Sir in 1911) who was between 1891-1892 Mayor of Cape Town ...
The question remains: When was he knighted? He could not have have become a Sir in 1911. Mieliestronk (talk) 18:53, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date when Sir David was knighted 

message: "During the Anglo-Boer War (1899–1902), Graaff obtained lucrative contracts to supply the British Army in the field, but he also made substantial donations towards alleviating the suffering of Boer prisoners of war, and providing medical supplies to Boer women and children held in British Army concentration camps."
I heard that slightly different. It wasn't really about medical supplies that were provided to the Boers in the concentration camps. What he, or his employees, did was picking up the killed cattle in the field and deliver the carcasses to the camps, where they then were used as food for Boer or Black prisoners. What's in the article sounds more like a hagiography of him, to place him in a better light, which is plausible, since he was an influential man --41.150.170.130 (talk) 20:33, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Involvement in Anglo Boer War and British atrocities against Boers and Blacks
Talk:The Monster That Challenged the World

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 17:41, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: Character names don't match the movie or IMDb. I fixed. :) AMCKen (talk) 23:00, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors
Talk:Dąbrowa Górnicza

message: This article is no B-class; it misses important sections and references. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  16:07, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review failed
Talk:Radom

message: I find it difficult to understand how there can be a history of Radom without indicating that in 1939 Jews were one third of the population of Radom. How one erase the memory of 30,000 Jews without any mention or indication that they existed.  76.186.236.167 (talk) 21:09, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In 1939 Jews were one third of the population of Radom, with Jews of all secs and types. There were both religious Jews and non-religious Jews. They worked as professors and store owners and most were highly educated. However, after the War no Jews remained. Most were gassed and sent to the death camps and few natives survived.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.198.119.115 (talk) 14:23, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jews before the war 

message: This article does not meet B-class criteria, due to missing key sections (ex. economy) and insufficient inline referencing (there are entire sections unreferenced). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  16:37, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review failed

message: Hi, what about adding an economy section here? This should definitely be in the article, it's not a small town after all. Who can do it? Thanks and cheers, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 14:41, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economy section
Talk:Stolberg-Wernigerode

message: Much of the unreferenced information which was previously listed contradicts text in Historisches Lexikon der deutschen Länder and Handbuch der historischen Stätten Deutschlands, Band 11, Provinz Sachsen/Anhalt. I am thus moving the unsourced list of rulers to the talk page. Olessi (talk) 02:53, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Counts
Talk:Stolberg-Stolberg

message: I don't believe that Joe Dizzle was the name of a count in this county. Blinder Seher 18:55, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Joe Dizzle ???

message: Much of the unreferenced information which was previously listed contradicts text in Historisches Lexikon der deutschen Länder and Handbuch der historischen Stätten Deutschlands, Band 11, Provinz Sachsen/Anhalt. I am thus moving the unsourced list of rulers to the talk page. Olessi (talk) 02:50, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Counts

message: Wasn't Stolberg-Stolberg already mediatised to Saxony in 1738?  I don't understand what could have changed in 1803. john k (talk) 23:12, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mediatisation
Talk:Sayn-Wittgenstein-Berleburg

message: The article is clear that elevation to a principality came in 1792, but the German article says "Der älteste, Georg, erbte den nördlichen Teil der Grafschaft Wittgenstein mit Sitz in Berleburg. Er begründete die Linie der Grafen und Fürsten zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Berleburg, die 1792 Reichsfürsten wurden" ambiguously implies that the county became a principality before 1792, when it became an imperial principality. Any clarity? Thanks. Spicemix (talk) 14:15, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  County/princiality
Talk:House of Auersperg

message: *Misleading title of the article: Auersperg was never a principality, but the name of a family; 
*neither was Auersperg ever  a “County” nor   a “State of Holy Roman Empire” 
*“Auersperg” was the name of a castle in Carniola, from which the family, which originally came from Carinthia,  took their name when acquiring the castle  in the 13th cent. It is not known whether they were relations, or  heirs of, or just sucessors in name to the original owners “Ursperch”  (“ur” = auer = aurochs).  
*Members of the family later owned bits and pieces of land all over the Reich some of which already had, or were later provided, with noble status (e.g. Duchy of Münsterberg & Frankenstein in Silesia, Duchy of Gottschee in Carniola, the  Nassaberg allodium in Bohemia, etc., etc.; the  owners of the Domaine of Tengen in Wurttemberg, for instance, rose to barons, then,  having acquired Nellenburg,  became  counts, sold Tengen-Nellenburg  to the Habsburgs, who in the 17th cent., together with the title of Count of Tengen, pledged  it to the Auerspergs,  and in 1654 the 70 km²-territory  was raised  to the status of a “princified county”, in German (just like the Tyrol) a  “gefürstete Grafschaft”, and the new owner, Count Weikard von Auersperg,  became a "Prince"). 
*”Auersperg was partitioned ... between itself, Auersperg-Schönfeldscher and Auersperg-Zweig“: complete nonsense!</br>
:" -scher“ in "Schönfeldscher“ just  means „ –ish“ (= of!)   In German grammar an adjective before  a masculine noun - "der Zweig" - has the ending -er if there is no article)! </br> Johann Adam of Auersperg, who although a just second son, was himself made a Prince by Emperor Francis Stephan, married a Katharina von Schönfeld, and when she died in 1754,  he inherited the Schönfeld (or Schönfeld'sche) property, which, lacking a son himself,  he passed on first to his nephew Karl, who also died without heir, and then to another nephew, Vinzenz (d. 1812), whom he had adopted,  and after Vinzenz’s early death in Feb. 1812 to Vinzenz’s posthumous son, Vinzenz Karl Joseph (* 17 July 1812). This male line, which may be called "Auersperg-Schönfeld" and was not actually started as a side line on secundogeniture, because its founder, John Adam Auersperg,  was created "Prince" in his own right,     became extinct in 1942. 
* "The Auersperg-Zweig:"..: "Princes of Auersperg-Zweig": German “Zweig“  just means "branch“  and is NO NAME!</br>
:European Heraldry has  the same nonsense:</br>“Princes of Auersperg-Schonfeldscher 1795-1938</br> Princes of Auersperg-Zweig 1795-1869 ”
*"All three territories..." nonsense!
*Categories: Former principalities | Former countries in Europe | States of the Holy Roman Empire | States and territories established in 1550 | = wrong! 
This  article certainly deserves a different  rating than "Stub-Class" on the  "quality scale"!--Marschner (talk) 10:55, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Lots of rubbish

message: #House of Auersperg, Barons, Counts, Princes, Dukes of Münsterberg etc.
#Imperial County of Tengen, held by the aforementioned
92.225.111.237 (talk) 09:37, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple issues
Talk:Musica universalis

message: How come there is nothing on Aristotle's refutation of the music of the spheres?
:Maybe you could add it? TheMadChild (talk) 20:56, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aristotle's Refutation 

message: Is this what we now call String Theory? 09:58, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: String Theory
Talk:Łódź Voivodeship

message: This article should be moved back to Łódź Voivodeship. See main discussion on Łódź talk page -- . 22:31, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Unwarranted move

message: I understand that there are issues related to characters and historical uses, but what is the point of maintaining a form of name that differs so much from the actual name for a place where the borders have changed so much? Is this not a good opportunity to actually reflect the place name? I live in Poland and there is no benefit to me if the name does not reflect the usage, because it is not just the province/voivodeship/wojewodsto name but any other name that uses the form, like castles, town halls, districts etc. If you are coming to Poland, doing business in this part of Poland or are just interested in it, then the actual name is far more significant. GeePig (talk) 09:18, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this be Łódzkie?
Talk:House of Colloredo-Mannsfeld

message: Both spellings occur in this article.  Mansfeld is linked from German Mediatisation and František Zdeněk Skuherský.  I've now made a redirect from that spelling, but please could someone who knows which spelling is right tidy it up!  I came across it when working on Wikipedia:WikiProject Red Link Recovery/Repeated letters.  PamD (talk) 22:55, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mannsfeld or Mansfeld?
Talk:Opole Voivodeship

message: Article says:
“It is part of Upper Silesia. A relatively large German minority, with representatives in the Sejm, lives in the voivodeship, and the German language is co-official in 28 communes.”
Without saying how many communes there are, it does not tell the reader very much. Frenchmalawi (talk) 16:18, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many communes are in the Province?
Talk:Vital Kamerhe

message: Vital Kamerhe Senate of Poland 01.JPG
Vital Kamerhe (2007)
Prime Minister-designate of the Democratic Republic of the Congo
Assuming office
24 January 2019
President	Félix Tshisekedi (elect)
Succeeding	Bruno Tshibala
Leader of the Union for the Congolese Nation
Incumbent
Assumed office 
June 19, 2010
Preceded by	Position established
Speaker of the National Assembly of the Democratic Republic of the Congo
In office
December 29, 2006 – March 26, 2009
Preceded by	Thomas Luwaka Losendjola
Succeeded by	Evariste Boshab
Personal details
Born	4 March 1959 (age 60)
Bukavu, Belgian Congo
Political party	Union for the Congolese Nation
Residence	Democratic Republic of Congo  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:1304:73DA:0:0:75:30A0 (talk) 08:19, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Guy Clutton-Brock

message: This article reads very positively, almost like an obituary - perhaps little surprise, when much of its sourcing comes from exactly that. Some particular sentences stick out:
* 
*  (uncited)
* : cited but gushing, and I'm not sure "the poverty-stricken countries of Africa" is quite encyclopaedic.
However, there's clearly a concern here as to what's not included as much as to what is. UndercoverClassicist (talk) 15:21, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality
Talk:Fürstenberg-Baar

message: Baar is not the same as the Duchy of Baar. In this case Baar is referring to the Landgraviate Baar. The Fürstenbergs have had the titel of Landgrave of Baar (Landgraf in der Baar) since 18 January 1283.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.181.124.89 (talk) 17:11, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Davide Tardozzi

message: Was he in charge of Corser's title-winning team? --MartinUK 22:59, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ablassé Ouedraogo

message: This article has less number of citations kindly provide proper citations and try to improve article according to Wikipedia policies and kind expand it and if you allow my self I can certainly help you in expanding it. Thanks.--Faizanalivarya (talk) 14:15, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanding and citations required 

message: Unclear if he won the election. I was here doing wiki links. Left the flag up because there may be more to do, esp after expansion and update. Also rather peacock. Somebody needs to remove some of the stuff about what a wonderful man he is. It may be true, but it’s overdone and unencyclopedic in my opinion. Elinruby (talk) 14:27, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs update and peacock removal
Talk:Christian Democratic Centre

message: Add "# Support" or "# Oppose" on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
#Support, as explained above. I wanted to change the title into Christian Democratic Centre also in order to make it coherent with the title of the article of CCD's successor party, the Union of Christian and Centre Democrats. I think it is logical to do so. --Checco 12:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: #Support, as explained above. I wanted to change the title into Christian Democratic Centre also in order to make it coherent with the title of the article of CCD's successor party, the Union of Christian and Centre Democrats. I think it is logical to do so. --Checco 12:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move

message: #Oppose centre is not more "correct" since it's not an English language based party. WP policy says in articles like this, to use the standard that the articles creator used. Just preferring a different spelling isn't good enough (see Talk:Pasteurization). TJ Spyke 02:55, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in opposition to the move

message: I don't think this is just the usual case of British vs American English; in this case, we've got an article on the UDC which uses "centre", and a very much related article (this one) which should therefore use the same type of English. Wouldn't you agree? —Nightstallion (?) 10:05, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I definitely support Nightstallion's argument. --Checco 06:05, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This case
Talk:Ibrahim Sesay (politician)

message: Why am I supposed to believe that the politician Ibrahim Sesay is the same Ibrahim Sesay who was an extra in Amistad? Why not different people with the same name? IMDb is not considered a reliable source, anyway. I'm going to remove it unless somebody provides some real evidence. Everyking 07:15, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Duke in Bavaria

message: I move this over here, as it is not a proper reference section, but rather gives factlets about various members of that line.
 ==References==
 Elisabeth (1837-1898), who became Empress of Austria, has many biographies. 
 Karl-Theodor (1839-1909) was a famous oculist; Fürst und Arzt by Richard Sexau 1965. 
 Their father (1808-1888) enabled the sponsorship of Richard Wagner by his cousin Ludwig II of Bavaria.
Str1977 (smile back) 10:54, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: So-called references

message: Johann of Zweibrücken-Gelnhausen (1698 - 1780) and Wilhelm (1752-1837) ?
Were the father and son ? It's not clear for me. Andrea1984 (from the German Wikipedia--80.121.72.196 (talk) 21:43, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Father and son ?
Talk:Nana Akufo-Addo

message: The second paragraph mentions that Akufo-Addo was one of the founders of the NPP but gives no explanation as to what it is or even what NPP stands for, not even a link.  I am sure readers would appreciate if this were explained or at least linked to an article about the NPP.
99.139.84.88 (talk) 19:09, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the NPP?
Talk:Lorsch codex

message: You mistranslated the German Wiki.  It states that this is an original codex from ca. 1175 AD, which is especially valuable to historians because (among other matters) it also transcribes the texts of hundreds of documents no longer extant.dunnhaupt (talk) 21:55, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Twelve and a half years later... fixed. -- asilvering (talk) 03:15, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: "No original" is wrong
Talk:Godesberg Program

message: Bernsteinian revisionist Marxists who founded the contemporary reformist social democracy were never ideologically "hostile" to capitalism as the one sentence says, because they adhered to the Marxist analysis that socialism would arise as a result of the evolution of capitalism. The claim that the Godsberg changes "abandoned" pre-existing class conflict ideas of the then revisionist Marxist SPD is also false, Bernsteinian revisionist Marxists rejected classical Marxist advocacy of class conflict, Bernstein promoted a socialist movement sought to resolve class disparities through a commitment to humanism, not class allegiance.--R-41 (talk) 02:19, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate statement about stance towards capitalism by pre-Godesberg revisionist Marxist policies
Talk:Project for Advice, Counselling and Education

message: I think expansion on the organisation's youthwork would be useful, as well as the groupwork courses PACE run.  Also, their links with other London LGBT organisations would help to grow the article.  Londonphill (talk) 02:18, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Federal Farm Loan Act

message: --Peace237 23:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: stub