lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:2nd Infantry Brigade (United Kingdom)

message: I think this small stub's contents can easily be merged into a page that talks about the whole history of the brigade.
Cheers
Buckshot06, Aug 8 2006
*Which one? I think that 2nd (Light) Brigade is the small one and should be added to this one. The 2nd Infantry Brigade as the title can be used for it's WWI history as well. I am coming across this problem with a few of the other brigade articles i have been  starting, conflicting eras for each unit. This article, is specifically, it's WWII history. Tristan benedict 16:01, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  What is the correct historical perspective on this brigade.  Note the use of the term during the Napoleonic wars .  Deet (talk) 05:45, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: ===Component units before disbandment===
2nd (South East) Brigade commands were:
* HQ 2nd (South East) Brigade: Shorncliffe Army Camp, Kent.
* 3rd Battalion, Princess of Wales's Royal Regiment (Queen's and Royal Hampshires) (3 PWRR): HQ in Canterbury, Kent.
* 103rd Battalion Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers (103 Bn REME): HQ in Crawley, Sussex.
* British Military Garrison Brunei, Seria, Brunei, including 1st Battalion, Royal Gurkha Rifles (1 RGR): British Resident Infantry Battalion (BRIB).
Sammartinlai (talk) 04:41, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  No sources 

message: 2nd (South East) Brigade commands were:
* HQ 2nd (South East) Brigade: Shorncliffe Army Camp, Kent.
* 3rd Battalion, Princess of Wales's Royal Regiment (Queen's and Royal Hampshires) (3 PWRR): HQ in Canterbury, Kent.
* 103rd Battalion Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers (103 Bn REME): HQ in Crawley, Sussex.
* British Military Garrison Brunei, Seria, Brunei, including 1st Battalion, Royal Gurkha Rifles (1 RGR): British Resident Infantry Battalion (BRIB).
Sammartinlai (talk) 04:41, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Component units before disbandment

message: Structure in 1989:
* 2nd Battalion, Royal Green Jackets
* 2nd Battalion, The Wessex Regiment (V)
* 5th Battalion, The Royal Green Jackets (V)
** Headquarters Company - Oxford
** A Company - High Wycombe
** D Company - Aylesbury
** E Company - Milton Keynes
* 5th Battalion, The Queen's Regiment (V)
** Headquarters Company - Canterbury
** B Company - Broadstairs
** C (Cinque Ports) Company - Hastings
** E Company - Tonbridge
* 6th/7th Battalion, The Queen's Regiment (V)
* 33rd (Explosive Ordnance Disposal) Engineer Regiment, Royal Engineers
* 69th Gurkha Independent Field Squadron
Why orbats needed down to the company-level?
Sammartinlai (talk) 04:42, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  1989
Talk:11th Armoured Brigade (United Kingdom)

message: :File:11th Infantry Brigade logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
-- Marchjuly (talk) 02:37, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for File:11th Infantry Brigade logo.jpg
Talk:4th Infantry Division (United Kingdom)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 4th Infantry Division (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150705211343/http://www.gulabin.com/armynavy/pdf/Army%20Commands%201900-2011.pdf to http://www.gulabin.com/armynavy/pdf/Army%20Commands%201900-2011.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140806195614/http://www.ra39-45.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk:80/index.html to http://www.ra39-45.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 13:31, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 
Talk:RIAA affiliated music artists

message: I redirected this list to Recording Industry Association of America because, well, it was useless.  It didn't define what "RIAA affiliated music artists" were, had no citations, and contained only a handful of entries despite existing since 2004.
The only really useful part of this page was a link to RIAA Radar, which does a far better job with this -- and there is already a link to that on the main RIAA page. --iMb~Meow 11:01, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:69th Infantry Brigade (United Kingdom)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 69th Infantry Brigade (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.routetovictory.info/50history.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011140946/http://www.greenhowards.org.uk/bill-cheall/cheall12.htm to http://www.greenhowards.org.uk/bill-cheall/cheall12.htm
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 20:24, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 
Talk:Mr. W.H.

message: An anonymous editor has replaced the article with the following utterance, which I am moving here:
:And this page remains as a dedication to the stupidity of Paul Barlow, who REMOVES all comments he does not like, rather than stating WHY he does not like them.
:Stupid stupid stupid.
:Shakespeare did NOT write the dedication to the sonnets. And, by the way, Master Barlow, have you actually read "Venus and Adonis?"
:Or the sonnets?
Reply: I have read all of Shakespeare's works. You are behaving like a vandal. Try reading WP:NPOV and WP:OR. The article does not claim that Shakespeare wrote the dedication. It attempts to cover all the notable arguments that have been used and continue to be used. Paul B 11:03, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It reminded me why I can't stand Rowse - not what he says, but the way in which he says it.  Anyone who needs an explanation WHY a comment like "This is simply idiotic" is unacceptable in an encyclopedia article doesn't have a clue as to what they are doing. Carlo 17:46, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Haiduc, in Shakespeare's day "Master" was not used for youths. The distinction between "Master" and "Mister" did not exist. It arose later (see Master (form of address)). Here is a scene from The Merry Wives of Windsor, see how the characters are addressed as "Master Ford" etc  Paul B 11:50, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If so I stand corrected. But Norton is a good historian. Could there be another side to this? Haiduc 11:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, Norton simply states his 'young sir' claim with evidence; as far as I know he's in error there. Check out Henry IV Part 2, where even a senile elderly gentleman is called 'Master Robert Shallow'. The Singing Badger 14:59, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Indeed. "Master Shallow" is supposed to be 80 in the Merry Wives. Paul B 15:11, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Master/Mister

message: I merged this page into Shakespeare's Sonnets, because it's a nuisance having them on separate pages. The Singing Badger 15:24, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:38th (Irish) Brigade

message: Is 2nd battalion PWRR in 38th Infantry Brigade? Ryan4314 14:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Army website, 2PWRR is still stationed at Ballykelly as part of 38 Brigade. It is due to be rotated to Afghanistan in 2008 following which it will be posted to Cyprus. Hammersfan, 16/11/07, 16.06 GMT  —Preceding comment was added at 16:06, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  PWRR 

message: New site aiming to gather as much information as possible about the Irish Brigade in World War II. It includes new information, histories, eye-witness accounts and details of all those who died in the brigade. See www.irishbrigade.co.uk  Edmund O'Sullivan (talk) 11:38, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Irish Brigade website
Talk:7th Light Mechanised Brigade Combat Team

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 7th Infantry Brigade and Headquarters East. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://regiments.org/regiments/uk/inf/025KOSB.htm
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 19:49, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 
Talk:All-Consuming Fire

message: I have deleted the reference to Fred Abberline as a fictional character from the Graphic Novel From hell. He was a real person as you can see in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abberline  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.97.184.156 (talk) 16:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I assume this novel's inclusion on that list is based on Third's brief appearance in the Diogenes Club, and First's in the framing story. Cameos don't count surely, or what about Fourth contacting his future self in Timewyrm: Genesys, or Eighth's appearance at the end of Damaged Goods? Daibhid C (talk) 19:53, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Multi Doctor?

message: Yes, there are now some WP:RS, but only to do with the fact that this book features a crossover between Doctor Who and Sherlock Holmes. There is an article . Ohwrotcod (talk) 13:38, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The sources - from the Radio Times and IO9 - merely establish the existance and content of the book, and the fact that multiple reputable outlets think of it as a good example of that sort of book.StuartDouglas (talk) 14:04, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources really notable?
Talk:Talona

message: Is the symbol for Talona correct? In the Faiths and Avatars accessory it lists the Symbol as:
"Three golden amber teardrops on a purple equilateral triangle with the point upward." Grey Shadow 11:12, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting, the R.A. Salvatore Canticle series lists it as three amber teardrops on a purple triangle (does not specify direction of triangle)  ALKIVAR™ 01:51, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talona Symbol
Category talk:Conceptual artists

message: where would I fit in ?
Here is my web site
http://edbaker.maikosoft.com
thanks, Ed Baker
:Sorry to say, you probably wouldn't fit in at all. But if you did, it is best to leave someone else to write up an entry. See Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Autobiography. -- Solipsist 13:16, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Curtis Brown

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 06:55, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support, as per nom.--Aldux 17:10, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survey
Talk:Telecommunications in Australia

message: There is a sentence under 'Early' in the second paragraph that reads: "Eight million telegrams were sent that year over 43,000 miles of line." However there is no mention of a year. --121.45.158.114 (talk) 15:35, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: What year

message: Telephony should probably have its own sub article too, so this article becomes a true overview rather than going into too much specific detail. — Донама 11:55, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Telephony

message: Where should the Internet and other digital communications fit? It kind of overlaps with telephony in obvious ways but also with radio in less obvious ways (microwave and radio wave spectrum mgmt). — Донама 11:55, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Internet, etc

message: Can somebody fix up parts of this article (in particular, those regarding Australia's internet services) which are incorrectly capitalised? I See Many Words That Are Capitalised For No Apparent Reason.
Also, I see a lot of accusations being made against Telstra. While I may agree to an extent, I hardly believe they are objective (NPOV), nor do they belong in an encyclopedia.
Sorry for not making the changes myself. Thankyou to whoever does. 211.30.235.72 09:41, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalisation 

message: The 40 Gbps capacity for SEA-ME-WE 3 seems out of date: but rather than just copying the information on the SEA-ME-WE 3 page, does anyone have a WP:RS for the current capacity of this system? -- The Anome (talk) 14:13, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  SEA-ME-WE 3 capacity 
Talk:Woodley, Berkshire

message: Some suggestions that would add to this article (will try and do some of these myself)
* Picture of Woodley town centre
* Culture :
** detail on the Woodley carnival (started in 1960, 46th in 2006 - what's the missing year?
**Woodley theatre/oakwood centre?
*Government - add the mayor's office?
Any other suggestions to add? MartinRe 12:11, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions to add
Talk:Ezzelino III da Romano

message: this article needs to be edited badly.  One of the contributors to this page is apparently not very familiar or comfortable with the English language and it shows in their erudition of language. Stevenmitchell 12:26, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've added another portrayal from a turkish novel, please correct it if necessary.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.100.156.204 (talk) 09:22, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  added another portrayal 

message: This page needs to be reconciled with the Italian version.  The only action that I took was to list contemporary portrayals of Ezzelino. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Brandon cohen (talk • contribs) 06:18, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  added a list of contemporary sources 

message: This page needs to be reconciled with the Italian version.  The only action that I took was to list contemporary portrayals of Ezzelino. Brandon cohen 06:19, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  added a list of contemporary sources 

message: I find the first paragraph of the Biography section confusing. it is not clear which Ezzelino (father or son) is "not a tall man, shrewd, cynical, ferocious, with blazing eyes, and gifted with great military abilities".--RR' 18:17, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography

message: I was remaking his coat of arms as SVG when I started to question the legitimacy of the current coat of arms, for there is no source for it. I searched for more information about any potential coat of arms, but the best thing I could find was the coat of arms of the community of Romano d'Ezzelino, whose current coat of arms was inspired Ezzelino III's emblem, Italian article describes Ezzelino's emblem as "horseshoe carried by a swan". This naturally isn't the current coat of arms, so either we need to confirm the current coat of arms or remove it. Go-Chlodio (talk) 07:40, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Coat of Arms?
Talk:Shepherding movement

message: What is missing in every article or post that I have read is the powerful Deliverance Ministry practiced by the men involved in the Shepherding Movement.  This is the idea that Christians have demons and need deliverance from their demonic influences.  There have been several books written by the members of the Ft. Lauderdale Five that deal with the idea of Deliverance.  The original idea for beginning the Shepherding Movement was due to the lack of Spiritual Fatherhood within the Church.  The original idea of the Shepherding Movement was that "the man in authority is the man under authority" had to do with the idea of defending oneself from being oppressed and attacked from Demons. Their idea of authority was that there would be an umbrella that Demons would not be able to penetrate. 
People involved in the Shepherding Movement have experienced cultish abuses from the "spiritual authority, (adopted into a spiritual family, changing their names, spiritual spankings, wine runs for their "spiritual fathers," false prophecy that is yelled in one's ear, etc.).  One may have seen this and experienced all of this, however, it is pretty difficult to say that there is no such things as demons when you experience demons manifesting in different voices then what normally comes out of the persons vocal chords. For a Christian believer one should recognize that there are reasons for people staying, (and still are involved), in the Shepherding Movement for so long.  As Christians we know that Satan is our enemy that warps truth, as he did in the case of the Shepherding Movement. We also know that we need to forgive those who sinned, and I have forgiven them.Easeltine (talk) 14:18, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Deliverance & Spiritual Fatherhood

message: "Watchman Nee's ... responsible for spiritual abuse in non-denominational charismatic churches." An objection --> http://www3.telus.net/trbrooks/discipling.htm --46.223.69.26 (talk) 01:55, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The link to the "objection" is no longer valid.  If there is a valid objection it should be spelled out here on the talk page. Darlig 🎸 Talk to me 15:36, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Today (Watchman Nee) 

message: I've gone through the references & updated to add some live links, yet I'm not experienced enough to fix 16, 17, & 20 being the same reference, yet listed separately.  Help, please! TSamuel (talk) 12:18, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference Cleanup
Talk:Presbyterian Ladies' College, Armidale

message: Comments like 'At PLC Armidale girls benefit from the proven advantages of an education at an all girl's school.' read just like a quote from an enrolment prospectus.  Couldn't this be a little more factual and a little less advertisement? Raena 13:26, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Err, isn't Duval across the road?? Why doesn't that rate a mention203.55.211.33 (talk) 11:06, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "neighbouring Schools"
Talk:List of state-established religions

message: The title List of official religions implies a recognized status that does not necessarily indicate a relationship to national government.  The title "List of national religions" is an improvement in this regard, although some other alternative may be preferred, such as "List of state established religions".  --Blainster 13:26, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: This article is redundant. All the info here is also on State ReligionPersonalbest 21:44, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Redirected to State religion, nothing was merged as all of the content is unreferenced.  Considering the sensitive nature of this content to many people there should be nothing questionable or unreferenced, if the article is recreated without reference I would support a PROD or WP:AFD. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:55, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete This Article

message: There is something odd about this article. For example, Germany is a secular state, which extends certain privileges to certain large-ish religious bodies. Besides the Roman Catholic church and the Protestant Churches, these would include--depending on the German state--the Old Catholic Church, some of the Jewish religious communities, the Methodists, the Seventh-Day Adventists, and other communities. Yet the article lists Germany as "Protestant" when it could, with equal justice (or injustice), be assigned to any other religion on the list.
Meanwhile, Russia has no official religion; as a practical matter is dominated by its Orthodox Church; and recognizes/permits a handful of other religions to operate with relative freedom. Yet the Russian republic of Kalmykia has declared both Orthodoxy and Tibetan Buddhism as co-official religions. Other regions may have similar arrangements.
In several cases, no official religion is named anywhere, yet a certain religion turns out to be integrated with the government and functioning as if it were official. I believe Bhutan would be an example, and possibly some of the East European countries.118.165.204.252 (talk) 08:52, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions
Talk:Pirates of the Caribbean Online

message: Full protection: Confirmed user edit war. Overheatedlaptop (talk) 17:47, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe you were trying to request that we revert back to this version, so I fixed the template for you. Unfortunately, that edit contains plenty of unsourced WP:GAMECRUFT, so it's unlikely we'll be adding that content back. Woodroar (talk) 00:43, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Pirates of the Caribbean Online | Full Protection]] 

message: I'm curious why we mention third-party fan projects at all? As far as I'm aware, they're not official spin-offs or affiliated with the original game in any way. The claims are supported by primary sources, which are inherently self-serving as used here. Plus it's in the lead! I'm not opposed to mentioning either or both projects briefly if doing so is supported by reliable, independent third-party sources (such as those at WP:VG/RS) but not until then. Woodroar (talk) 02:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: They're not official spin-offs. It seems the creators of TLOPO and POR didn't even ask for permission to recreate the game but they think Disney won't sue them as long as they don't make any profit on the game.--Max Tomos (talk) 19:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third-party fan projects 

message: I can see that there was an edit war from the history and the talk page, but the article used to be much longer than it is now. Why was it shortened so much? --ScriptorHistoriae (talk) 01:33, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: All of the WP:GAMECRUFT was removed. Woodroar (talk) 03:21, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I just looked back at the history and it looks like it was shortened in the edit war. I think the article should just be reverted to the October 18th version, which was before the edit war started. It looked much better and had a lot more content. --ScriptorHistoriae (talk) 18:02, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: My bad, I just saw your comment above. --ScriptorHistoriae (talk) 18:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

text:  Honestly, no it shouldn't. The major part of the edit war took place between October 18 and December 22, and not much was changed in the process. It was user , who remove a lot of content from the article -- but correctly: He was right in saying that the content given was not properly sourced and hence had to be removed. The "Closure" section was eventually restored, and there was a back-and-forth about the unsourced "Development" section, and the naming of the two fan revival projects on December 24. Everything that happened after that was pretty much just housekeeping by me. So, no. No need and no sense in reverting here. Lordtobi (✉) 18:12, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I saw Woodroar's comment right after saying that. If I have the time, I might try to provide citations for the section that got removed. Being as large of an MMO as the game was, it definitely deserves a larger article. --ScriptorHistoriae (talk) 19:55, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the article shortened?