Talk:Islam in Denmark

message: This part - "In 2009, the U.S. Department of State released a report on religious freedom in Denmark. One finding was that there were a few isolated incidents of discrimination against immigrants, which included desecration of graves" - is of highly questinable use in this context. The referenced report does not specify which religion is targeted the most - newspaper articles from the period report of several Jewish graves being desecrated and Jews leaving areas in Copenhagen, and avoiding using Jewish kippahs. If there are any reports of attacks on Muslims, Muslim graves being desecrated, this must be substantiated by the author - otherwise the reference to this US governement report is misleading.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blingladen (talk • contribs) 17:22, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ii 

message: The Danish Queens' statement about that "We have to show our opposition to Islam" is not right. Several Danish newpapers have informed that it was the British newspaper,The Daily Telegraph, who had translated the word "opposition" wrong. The right word in the Queens book was the Danish word "modspil" which mean counter-balance.
Kasper Holl 15:22, 5 March 2006 (CEST)
* A danish article about the misunderstanding.
* We need a counter-balance to Islam, says Danish queen
* The Daily Telegraph statement about the misunderstanding
Changed anti-muslim to anti-immigration in the description of the policy of the ruling coalition. Even though the laws have been criticized as being anti-muslim, members of the ruling coalition have denied this, and no Danish law would be allowed to specifically target out muslims. So, not NPOV. It could be argued that the entire section on immigration policies should be moved.
Also changed the sentence "Violent protest caused by..." to something closer to the original intention. The word "by" had been inserted later, to make an entirely different, and incorrect, meaning.
--Ntwo 20:37, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict

message: I am not saying that this claim (2 - 5 per cent are Muslims) is wrong. It just (de facto) isn't sourced, so i tagged it "citation needed". There were two sources until I removed them - the CIA World Factbook and the United States State Department. However, the CIA World Factbook is in itself unsourced, and it also claims that 98 per cent of the population are Christians, which is most definitely wrong (According to a Eurobarometer survey only 31% of the population reply in the affirmative when asked whether they believe in God). The other source is just a mirror of the initial source (one piece of info does not become more reliable just by duplicating it). Alfons Åberg 14:06, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "2-5" per cent is a wide range. Isn't there a more precise statistic?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.196.243.15 (talk) 20:01, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that's the problem. Denmark doesn't have official statistics on this sort of stuff, at least not to my knowledge. ko268 March 25, 2008, 1:27  —Preceding comment was added at 05:27, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 - 5 per cent are Muslims? 

message: Click here: http://damp.mono.net/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.196.243.15 (talk) 20:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islamic party wants to take over Denmark 

message: This is one of the most biased wikipedia articles I have ever seen. A political party is referred to as a "hate group", cartoons are denigrated for their supposed lack of artistic merit, sources link to random blogs by unknown individuals, and the whole thing (particularly the abysmal conflict section) reads from a shamelessly biased perspective. It is clearly designed to denigrate those who have raised objections to the presence of Islam in Danish society. Wikipedia isn't a free internet hosting service for you to upload your personal political views. This is supposed to be an impartial website, where information is presented from a neutral perspective. That means it shouldn't read as an argumentative essay.  220.253.113.144 (talk) 07:54, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I just noticed this article and removed lots of text that was either blatantly irrelevant to Islam in Denmark, violating WP:POV or violating WP:OR. Should the text be inserted again just delete it again. -TheG (talk) 05:32, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

text: So summing up you want to show to everyone how terrible and bad Danish people are on an article about Islam in Denmark? It is utterly irrelevant. If you want to post WP:POV you should rather create a blog, not edit an encyclopedia. -TheG (talk) 21:37, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

text: These comments are so clear abuses of WP:POV and complete irrelevant for an article about Islam in Denmark. You fail to understand that this is an encyclopedia, not a blog to present "bad" or "good" things. -TheG (talk) 21:40, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

text: It is not appropriate to turn this article into some kind of coatrack for attacks on Scandinavians.  It is not appropriate to jump to probably false conclusions about contributors to Wikipedia, and then make personal attacks on them based on the conclusions jumped to.  And, it is not appropriate to use IP sockpuppets to evade a block.  Cardamon (talk) 20:42, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ive cut down some of the statements that I felt were irrelevant to the article and/or supported with unreliable references.  Im open to discussing any of the edits Ive made.  Please understand however that even if something is true, that doesn't mean it's relevant to the article.  —Soap— 23:08, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extremely poor quality, biased article 

message: I noticed that the Ahmadi are mentioned as a cult in the Religious issues section, and that their link lead to the "Qadiani" article, which claims that this is a pejorative term. I don't know anything about the Ahmadi, but unless more knowledgeable people objects, I will change this to "Ahmadi faith" and the link to the "Ahmadiyya Muslim Community". --Martcx (talk) 10:32, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ahmadi cult" 

message: There should be a separate article called Ahmadiyya in Denmark.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.182.86.101 (talk) 12:48, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Seperate article for Ahmadiyya

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Islam in Denmark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060208030036/http://www.um.dk/Publikationer/UM/English/Denmark/kap1/1-14.asp to http://www.um.dk/Publikationer/UM/English/Denmark/kap1/1-14.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:46, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Islam in Denmark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/country,,USDOS,,DNK,,4cf2d0a2c,0.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20010701053158/http://www.islam.dk/content.asp?art_id=28 to http://www.islam.dk/content.asp?art_id=28
*Added  tag to http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/country,,USDOS,,DNK,,4cf2d0a2c,0.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090306123413/http://www.humanityinaction.org/docs/Goldberg__Krasner,_2001.pdf to http://www.humanityinaction.org/docs/Goldberg__Krasner,_2001.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516235043/http://www.ungemuslimer.dk/ to http://www.ungemuslimer.dk/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110124063239/http://www.sappho.dk/de-demokratiske-muslimer-hvor-blev-de-af.htm to http://www.sappho.dk/de-demokratiske-muslimer-hvor-blev-de-af.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:38, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified