lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tours

message: I'm no sociolinguist, but isn't the claim that the Tourangeaux (or anyone) speak French "devoid of any accent" naive? Sure some people believe they have no accent,
but they're deluded. Can some linguist rewrite this pls? Coughinink 15:00, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello there. I live in Tours and we are said to have no accent, and we pretend it. In fact, as everyone, we have an accent. But the way of speaking french in Touraine is considered as the main way. We you learn french, you learn the way to speak in Touraine, not the way to speak in Calais or Marseille. Désolé si ce n'est pas très clair. En gros, il y a bien un accent tourangeau, mais il est considéré comme l'accent standard du français. FreD 16:51, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actual examples should be given of the dialects of Tour and Paris. The reader can judge for himself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.147.175.160 (talk) 15:52, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "No accent" ?? (Under language) 

message: French pronunciation is inscrutable to me.  Could someone add this?
:in IPA, i think you should wrote it tuя, but i'm not sure. try to pronounce it as toorh... FreD 16:53, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to Pronounce? 

message: Not relevant to this article, but I went to Tours in 2006 and I thought it was a great place, I'd love to go back again. Mglovesfun 14:40, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice place 

message: I would like to improve the article by copy-editing some of the English text. Mikeo1938 (talk) 23:02, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I've made a start but there is still a lot to do.  Perhaps the existing text was generated by a machine translation program ... (?) Mikeo1938 (talk) 15:35, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: English Translation

message: 69.255.89.223 (talk) at 09:05, 14 December 2008
added a line and reference about plans to build a mosque. The website referenced to is that of the British National Party. I was unable to find a more objective source for this. I think the passage should be rephrased (with a credible source) or removed. Ideas?
82.170.157.29 (talk) 23:11, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mosque reference

message: What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content! Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 17:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Timeline of Tours]]
Talk:Wong Jack-man

message: is this william chen the same william c.c. chen up in New York city?  if it is, is there any interviews with him on this subject?--Blckavnger 02:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: sorry nevermind, its not the same guy --Blckavnger 03:26, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: william chen

message: It seems odd that two accounts from two different people are posted here in their entirety, but only a vague reference to anything from the person that this article is about?  If there is a link to the article, then whomever did so should have translated it and posted his account right? 152.130.14.3 (talk) 20:42, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Where's His Account?

message: English is not my mother tongue so sorry for writing and grammar errors. It´s just a suggestion of course, but it has been established in the western world to write chinese names different. Look as example the pages of Mao Zedong or Xi Jinping. If you would write their names like Mr. Wong here in the article, it would be Mao Tse Tung or Xi Jin Ping, but as you can see it is not like this anymore. The western world has adapted to write chinese first names in one name, not Jack Man but Jackman instead. So i would say Wong Jackman or Wong Jack-man would be more correct in today´s writing. 
It is also confusing for most western people to write his given name as Jack Man. Look for example for the Korean Hwang Jang-lee, there is at least a hyphen between the two names. Even the UN has adopted to write chinese given names as one name, same does National Olympic Committee. The Boxer Zhang Zhi Lei is written as Zhang Zhilei. And in the Wiki article of Bruce Lee, his chinese birth name Jun Fan is written as Jun-fan. And his father Lee Hoi Chuen is written as Lee Hoi-chuen. Of course its only a thought and suggestion. I allow me to change it in the article. If not wanted just delete my change. Best regards --Alleingänger (talk) 12:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The writing of his name still correct today?
Talk:Odonata

message: I think Systematics and taxonomy section should be revised to Zygoptera, Anisoptera and Anisozygoptera as Dijkstra et al. restored this old classification and this is what now Wold Odonata List follows. Jee 06:14, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not clear to me what taxonomy is being followed for insects in general or Odonata in the specific. There seem to be two schools of thought for Odonata. The traditional Anisozygoptera is paraphyletic with respect to Anisoptera, which is why the change to Epiprocta was made, so as to have a monophyletic group containing the fossil species. The classification of Dykstra et al (2013, 2014) used in  the World Odonata List only deals with extant species where Anisozygoptera only has two species in Epiophlebiidae which is the sister to Anisoptera. A redefined Anisozygoptera restricted to Epiophlebiidae would be monophyletic, but Dykstra et al (2013) don't say how the fossil species would be handled in their scheme. They either accept a paraphyletic taxon or would need additional suborders for extinct forms. If the article is to be changed to their scheme, the handling of the fossil species would need to be clarified. It would be useful to find some more recent studies to see if they accept the Dykstra et al (2013) classification or retain Epiprocta.   Jts1882 | talk  09:03, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revising Systematics and taxonomy 

message: * 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
--Anas1712 (talk) 22:20, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  References of journal articles 

message: — Assignment last updated by Nprosenthal14 (talk) 14:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: General Entomology
Talk:Kannoor

message: * There's already a good article on Kannur, so this variant spelling should be redirected. At a quick glance, there's not much worth merging. --Mereda 14:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: * Agree, merge anything worth merging, and turn into a redirect. Thanks! Fram 15:15, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Daniel J. Burke

message: So I deleted this section that was added in 2014 by an IP address user out of Springfield, Illinois.
"On March 14, 2014 Representative Daniel Burke added amendment #1 to Illinois house bill 4036 which would outlaw the sale of un-pasteurized (raw) milk in the state of Illinois.  Since 2012, Illinois department of public health had been trying to create new rules to govern the sale of raw milk in Illinois.  They created a dairy workgroup made up of raw milk farmers, consumers, health officials, and pasteurized milk dealers.  The group had worked very hard for over a year, meeting several times, trying to work out rules both sides could agree on.  Daniel Burke circumvented the farmers, consumers, and IDPH, when he created the amendment to ban all raw milk sales in Illinois."
Reasoning(s): It lacked citation for the creation of the Dairy Work group, its composition or its meetings. The quote "Daniel Burke circumvented the farmers, consumers, and IDPH, when he created the amendment to ban all raw milk sales in Illinois," does not seem neutral as it makes it sound like he did something nefarious/unethical. It also doesn't mention the bill died (which I would have added if I didn't have the other issues). If someone wants to take a shot at making it more neutral go ahead.
– mpen320 (talk) 10:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section I Deleted
Talk:Wylie Dufresne

message: Wylie isn't a scientist, and molecular gastronomy has to deal with Science. Though he calls his style that of molecular gastronomy, he is in no way a scientist or know anything about Science.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.40.170.139 (talk) 03:07, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hengrave Hall

message: Nice to see that Hengrave has been moved into its own article. I'm currently writing a book on the stained glass in the chapel. I have to take issue with one point; I do not think the house is constructed out of materials from any of the monastic properties in the area. The stone certainly did not come from Bury St Edmunds and I doubt it came from Ixworth Priory; the article tends to cast doubt on itself by saying Ixworth was dissolved in 1536 and the house was completed in 1538 (see date on gateway). The house was started in 1525 and most of it was already complete by 1536 - it was already finished by the time any stone became available from Ixworth. C B Newham 15:05, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Chacor

message: Username	Chacor
Total edits	3944
Distinct pages edited	642
Average edits/page	6.143
First edit	03:58, 14 June 2006
	
(main)	1705
Talk	807
User	179
User talk	512
Image	33
Template	57
Template talk	4
Wikipedia	324
Wikipedia talk	79
Portal	228
Portal talk	16
Chacor's edit summary details as of 15:05, September 18 2006, using Interiot's tool. (aeropagitica) 15:06, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Refactoring here to reduce the length of the main page...
# Opppose with regret. I do not have the facts to judge in the ArbCom case, so my opposition is not based solely on that (but I tend to take the word of folk like Mindspillage without hesitation). What I do have is this: that this user chose to oppose an impending OFFICE action in the HRE affair, and abusively swore at me for my actions in trying to carry out Danny's direct instructions, instead of (apparently) taking my word that I was acting in good faith. If this user cannot trust a fellow admin when he says Danny told him to do something, I certainly cannot trust him with adminship. Diffs coming shortly  ++Lar: t/c 11:40, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:Lar|Lar's]] oppose 

message: Nilfanion gave this diff.  On further inspection, accounts Chacor and NSLE both voted in the same Requests for Adminship.  Not only that, but it was a such a lazy use of sockpuppets, the owner of the two accounts (for those unfamiliar, Chacor admits to being NSLE) used a sock right after his primary account.  Anomo 20:41, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See User talk:Jahiegel. – Chacor 03:09, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replying to Nilfanion's comment
Talk:Yū Aoi

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: Closing with no action. This discussion was initiated and participated in by sockpuppets of a permanently blocked editor; it is too affected by sockpuppetry to determine consensus. Cúchullain t/c 20:16, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yū Aoi →  – as per the official website. Yu Aoi is "the form personally or professionally used by the person (such as on their official website or official social media profile), if available in the English/Latin alphabet" (WP:JATITLE#Names of modern figures). 123.225.49.247 (talk) 08:03, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
While I won't make another move because the above proves that it is such a touchy subject, but Aoi is a very well-known public figure in Japan and her agency's profile and full website clearly and consistently use the "Yu Aoi" spelling (they're inconsistent on the name order, so the rules seem to be to default to family name last in such cases). See also the poster for the film Redline and more recently that for  Killing, in which her name is again written "Yu Aoi" in both cases (and they are consistent with putting the family name last). It's not case of going on something as liminal as a URL, album cover or an official use only by the person's agency and nowhere else.
--Tempjrds (talk) 03:17, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Baldwin of Forde

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#:: 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#:: 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#:: 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#It is stable.
#:No edit wars etc.: 
#:: 
#It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
#:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass/Fail: 
#:: </div>
Comments:
#The "Archbishop of Canterbury" section is far too long. It should be broken up with at least one subsection to make it easier on the reader.
: Done. Hopefully it was broken in a way that works, if not we can try something different. Ealdgyth | Talk 05:10, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. The weirdness resulted from large chunks of the article being here before I started revising, and me just staring at the prose too much to see the weirdnesses. Ealdgyth | Talk 05:10, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Done. I just wiped it from the article, as I have lost my copy of Runicman's third volume (which covers the Third Crusade) and cannot possibly source the data. Luckily, it happened after Baldwin's death so I can cut it without hurting the narrative. Ealdgyth | Talk 05:10, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Done. Expanded by about four sentences. Let me know if you would like more. Ealdgyth | Talk 05:10, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the great review. I'll get to them tomorrow, I'm hip deep in William de St-Calais right now, which I've been trying to get to for days, so I don't wanna stop myself when I finally got on a roll... Ealdgyth | Talk 04:21, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Great work as usual. A lot of clever and unexpected solutions to my concerns this round too. I will now be passing this as a Good Article. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work! Cheers, CP 05:16, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Review 

message: Methinks this article would benefit from more images.  Images would liven up the visuals and to help readers better navigate the article.  I realize that if there were images of Baldwin, they'd already be in the article, but perhaps there are additional appropriate images.  I'll look.  Madman (talk) 05:04, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More images?
Talk:Danilo Medina

message: Why the name Medina then?MohammedBinAbdullah (talk) 16:34, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is he Muslim? 
Talk:Reginald Fitz Jocelin

message: I'm pretty much the principle editor on this page, and I nominated it for GA status. I'm on vacation this weekend, so will be much less available than usual. I should still be available, but figured I should drop a note here to let folks know.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ealdgyth (talk • contribs) 19:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA nomination notice

message: I think this is an excellent article, and I only have a few minor suggestions for its improvement.
*I assume there are no images of Reginald?
:None that I've found on Commons. ODNB says there is a seal extant, but I don't have access to it. Ealdgyth | Talk 01:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Will do! Ealdgyth | Talk 01:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

text: After I completed most of the research on the current version, I came across some journal articles, that I will get worked into the article before I attempt to take it to FA. As far as I've been able to find, there is no good history of the medieval bishops of Bath, so it is a case of gathering very scattered information together, which takes time. Ealdgyth | Talk 01:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Thanks much! Ealdgyth | Talk 01:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA passed

message: Any reason for the move? The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography spells it with a lower f, which is why the article was named the way it was. It's also generally considered polite to ask about potential moves on the talk page before just moving, especially as you didn't fix the redirects you just created.  gives the links that are now going through a redirect. Ealdgyth - Talk 12:48, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: Jean Manco, Shelter in old age: isn't a reliable source, but the information is still in the article, as the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography article includes the information that he founded the hospital in Bath. I'm moving the link back to the external links, unless folks would prefer there was no link at all. Ealdgyth - Talk 23:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source
Talk:The Face (Vance novel)

message: Anyone know why there's a 12 year gap between this book and the previous tome? Did Vance weary of writing them? Peter1968 15:22, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: As far as I can tell, the lanslarke appears only twice in the book: once in Maxel Rackrose's list of homonyms of "Lens Larque", and later (as "lancilark") in a footnote on Darsh criminal punishments.  In my copy (the DAW mass-market paperback) the two appearances are spelled differently.  Has this been corrected in later editions?  -- Dominus 09:14, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice catch, iskish. I used the same Daw edition. Maybe lanslarke is the singular form of the word and lancilark the plural. If you don't like that interpretation, you can take it up with Panak. I'm curious to see how the Vance Integral Edition handles it (though not $1500 curious). Clarityfiend 21:45, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  SF Bookclub edition has the same thing. I've misplaced the Grafton/Collins edition I had of the book, so I couldn't tell you re: it. There's a few of these "mismatches" in Vance's writing. In Servants_of_the_Wankh Vance calls the place in Settra the "Mercade" on one page, then the "Cercade" on another, then back to "Mercade" once again. I've seen this in several editions of the same book. Peter1968 10:23, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

text: The VIE was exactly what i was wondering about; I'd hoped someone reading this might have a copy.  -- Dominus 17:19, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lanslarke 

message: Suggest we drop some of the info on Dar Sai on this page, as the linked article is perfectly adequate (he says modestly) Captain Pedant 22:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dar Sai
Talk:Yuliya Gushchina

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 01:22, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Google.by

message: I'm at school, so I obviously can't do it at the moment, but someone should probably update this page with a screen shot of the website, since it'll probably be taken down soon anyway. Shamess 15:24, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Delete this very not notable page!  Nasa-verve (talk) 00:46, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenshot 

message: An editor restored uncited material, without supplying requisite RS refs, per wp:burden. I would ask the editor to self-revert. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Google.by&diff=1084970797&oldid=1084970114 --2603:7000:2143:8500:D81D:8498:830C:AF0B (talk) 17:59, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Pinging  here. InfiniteNexus (talk) 20:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  wp:burden 

message: All other regional Google domains are just redirects. (Eg. Google.co.uk, Google.co.jp). Finxx (talk) 15:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You are welcome to make a WP:MERGEPROP or take it to WP:AFD. InfiniteNexus (talk) 23:07, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't this just be a redirect to [[Google Search]]?
Talk:Yumi Nakashima

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 22:15, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Is her name Yumi (ゆみ) or Yūmi (ゆうみ)? Yumi is a far more common name, but the kanji would seem to imply that it's Yūmi, as would her releasing an album under the name Yū (ゆう). LordAmeth (talk) 17:13, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's ゆみ. ゆう is her stage name/nickname. See . Megaversal (talk) 07:55, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, ok. Thanks. LordAmeth (talk) 15:04, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Albany, Ohio

message: Once of the first sentences about Albany, Ohio is that is was founded in the 1840's.  This is wrong.  The town was founded in 1834.  I have a picture taken in 1934 which states the town was celebrating its   100the anniversary.  Ben Canny
:If you can prove it with a reliable source, please make the change. SpencerT♦C 22:41, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Founded?
Talk:Yuriy Kutsenko

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 21:03, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Yusef Abdullah Saleh Al Rabiesh

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 19:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 15:58, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed picture
Talk:Darien Fenton

message: Gadfium,
Why isn't Investigate a reliable source regarding this? I've never read it previously, but it's a published magazine. Of course it's got its biases, but then so does The Listener or The ODT. Having said that, if it's more of the National Enquirer of NZ then maybe that comment needs to be left off! Tristanb (talk) 08:02, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Darien Fenton's website and Facebook links are now defunct. Please rectify Tiwaking (talk) 23:45, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Links 
Talk:Yves Rodier

message: Hello! Uhm.. are we sure that the image shown in the article is showing Yves Rodier?
He doesn’t look like him. When you look wt this photo for example: https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/tintin/images/d/d2/Rodeir.png/revision/latest?cb=20130712145515 
This photo shows him signing books and you can tell it is really him because you can see his name on the lower right corner.
And look at his face. There is no mole above his eye. The man in the image of this wikipedia article does have a mole there.
Can someone ‘fact check’ the image in the article?
Triangulum (talk) 16:41, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Zach Helm

message: As an editor has said when adding a cn tag, the TMZ article Helm gave a quote to doesn't actually say the production was troubled. Some interviews he gave at the time made it sound like he was quite happy on the set:  . When he called the film "a train wreck", did he just mean that he was unhappy with the finished product? Per$1$tenceofv1$1on (talk) 02:41, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, since that template message has been on the article for two and a half years, I've gone ahead and deleted the statement. Per$1$tenceofv1$1on (talk) 22:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr Magorium