lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lee Hoesung

message: If you go to the article about that great literary prize in Japan, Lee Hoesung & his work are not listed. Is this a joke? (Wikimachine 03:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you talking about the Akutagawa Prize? If the sources don't convince you that this isn't a joke, try Special:Whatlinkshere/Lee Hoesung. In fact, he is listed there, under the Japanese pronunciation "Ri Kaisei", for the book mentioned, Kinuta wo utsu onna. Cheers, cab 22:25, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Great XXX award 
Talk:Horse the Band/Archive 1

message: I wrote it as SUPER HORSE the band since this is what it is listed as on their website and on punknews.org.  Where has the title Mechanical Hand come from  -- are you mistaken because Mechanical hand is a track on the same CD?  -- Jontce 1 July 2005 13:34 (UTC)
Taken from the HORSE the Band news page:
HORSE the band announces the recording of their second full length album, rightfully entitled "SUPER HORSE the band".
SUPER HORSE the Band is definitely the title. --Casiotone 1 July 2005 15:13 (UTC)
:Having said that, they just posted a bulletin on MySpace in which they've said it's The Mechanical Hand. Sorry :( --Casiotone 10:07, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: New Album Title

message: there needs to be something about their whole myspace top friends being all pizza which was a brilliant idea —Preceding unsigned comment added by Burger king (talk • contribs) 
As far as band history goes, that really isn't important at all.Kramertron 14:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  pizza 

message: are they screamo?? oh no...
no. no they're not. i guess people are gonna try and label them a whole bunch of things.... cos they're not really mathcore either I like post hardcore cos you cant seem to go wrong with that - most cool bands are post hardcore -  --Sharonlees 14:46, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screamo??! 

message: I'm wondering if anybody know what the Bands name means. I kind of find the name to be a little.... well.... gay. so can someone please tell what the name means or at least what they think it means.
My penis is a better guitarists than the ones in Horse the Band. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PieIsWickedGood565 (talk • contribs) 13:13, 29 November 2006
:I don't know who this band is but maybe you should have a look at WP:CIVIL and then come back. Sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~) --WikiSlasher 13:18, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Name?
Talk:Vid

message: Since the dawn of Modern Humans the realization, by each person, of they’re “knowing” has been most valuable. Early linguistic records show that the root of this realization was the root “vid”. 
VID was uttered or spoken for millenia before the first written languages appeared. Vid first appeared in written form that is traceable in Sanskrit.
"Sanskrit vid is not a word, like the Latin videre, but what we technically call a 'root' that is a sort of grammatical abstraction from which verb forms are made by the application of certain rules."  This according to Dr. Walter Maurer, Professor of Sanskrit, Department of Indo-Pacific languages, University of Hawaii at Manoa. 
It is recognized in "Proto-Indo-Eurasian" studies as the root VID, meaning "to know", in Southwestern Asia.
With the advent of written languages, including as cuneiform and Sanskrit, VID spread in many directions. To the east vid formed "Veda" meaning "knowledge" or even "sacred knowledge". 
VID also migrated by "unmistakable affinity" according to Carl W. Conrad, Department of Classics, Washington University (Emeritus), to the west, where early Greeks used the root "vid", and later "video" meaning "to know", and eventually to Latin "video" meaning "I see" or "I apprehend". The roots of VID are inextricably connected to "knowing".
In spite of this extensive history, only one language, a dialect of Southern Danish, still refers to “vida” as “to know”? [Phylogentic methods and the prehistory of languages – Peter Forster & Colin Renfrew]
Bobkiger (talk) 23:51, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Game rip (audio)

message: I'm not really sure where to get references for a lot of this info. Most of it is just common practice from various communities of game music fans. Are there any specific areas where sources are needed? --Kaleb.G 13:01, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added some links for references. Hopefully this is enough for now to at least convey the idea that this article isn't just fluff. --Kaleb.G 21:25, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citing sources 

message: This link is broken: http://www.grawl.nl/index.php?page=rippingguide
  –Justin Force 17:52, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link 

message: I say that they should erase it to this article --Pablo323 (talk) 05:12, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Que porqueria de articulo, con razon tienen tantos este wiki --190.137.186.162 (talk) 19:05, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

text: No offense, but it doesn't seem like you understand English well enough to make a sound assessment about deleting an English article. --Kaleb.G (talk) 19:53, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete

message: Not unless they are not a game but a soundtrack. I changed all the articles and references that I could find that incorrectly state that VGM from CD Games are Redbook it is not. Redbook CDDA is an audio only format and very specific standard (i.e. audio only, single session etc.). Yellowbook CD-ROM is data only and what most games used, however when they use CD Streaming Audio the format is properly called Mixed Mode CD. The first track is always data and the rest are audio - this is not Redbook or Yellowbook but a mix :) I am surprised on how many articles have incorrectly used this on Wiki. Please be aware of this misconception and help change any incorrect references other the ones I have found.
Corrected: Streaming audio in video games, Video game music, Game rip (audio).
Thanks. Tyros1972 (talk) 20:38, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No CD Games used Redbook CDDA 

message: There are a number of issues that I can see, but asking for help and ideas on this.
First off not sure that the way some of the explanations are written in context for wiki, such as stating editing or remastering is needed if a game rip is made (that's an optional aspect).
Secondly the article has only 2 sources to verify what is written, obviously we need to find more reliable sources concerning Game Audio Ripping.
 
Anyone have ideas or suggestions? Tyros1972 (talk) 03:28, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Improvement Ideas 

message: I have removed the GiivaSunner promotional section again, it makes very little sense and seems to serve only to promote the youtube channel. I don't think it even makes sense to link to it as a reference, as it doesn't contain information about ripping, only the rips themselves (and some amount of parody?). Agashlin (talk) 22:13, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  GiivaSunner
Talk:Prince of Wales Mini School

message: I am assessing this article following a request. The article currently needs a lot of work, and barring a few external links does not reference material at all, and as a result I am demoting it to Start-class. I am not even convinced that the school programme passes Wikipedia:Notability and hence deserves its own article, school programmes are generally not notable, and if this programme is an exception to this it needs to show it better through the article. Much of the article content seems to be rather promotional (WP:NPOV) and go into trivial details  which are of little interest to a wider audience (WP:WPSCH/AG#WNTI). I would suggest this be merged and re-directed to Prince of Wales Secondary School with a summary of the programme kept there. Camaron ·  Christopher · talk 11:49, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well the current article does not pass the Wikipedia:Notability guideline, and I have not yet heard or seen anything that convinces me otherwise, and the burden is on those wishing to keep the article to show it can pass policies/guidelines, particular given this goes against general precedent as described above. I am relaxed on article inclusion so I will leave it for now but if these issues are not settled in lets say a month, I may take it to WP:AfD or similar. Elementary issues such as WP:NPOV also need to be resolved. Camaron ·  Christopher · talk 21:26, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

text: Since the above concerns have not been resolved I have reverted this article back to a re-direct. Please do not re-create it without addressing them. Camaron ·  Christopher · talk 18:34, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:EFC

message: Please help me add more information to this page. I was looking up on wiki one day to try and find out more about EFCs and they only had this other EFC about some Canada thing. So I know I am not the only one curious about the financial EFCs. Feel free to edit :)
Headcuff 00:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Older thread 

message: Is EFC actually used as an abbreviation for the horse? The Horse article does not say so. Викидим (talk) 14:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Equus ferus caballus is actually the scientific name for horse. Sham Tseng (talk) 23:15, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, but I have never seen this abbreviated.  Викидим (talk) 05:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horse
Talk:Cults, Aberdeen

message: Hadrianheugh 00:04, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs to clearly state western terminus of cults

message: Unless I'm mistaken, this article is at the wrong title and should be moved to Cults, Aberdeen.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 18:25, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's not in Aberdeenshire - it's within the boundaries of Aberdeen City 

message: I submitted an article stub on the Multiplicants and planned to enter
another on the Lothardi.  But the Multiplicants one was deleted due
to insufficient data.  I figured I'd combine them into a single page,
but wasn't sure where to go with it.  
Ideas or suggestions?  This page cults looked reasonable, but
the content didn't quite match.  
Nodosaurus (talk) 18:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where should cult articles go?
Talk:Our Exagmination Round His Factification for Incamination of Work in Progress

message: Vladimir Dixon's Wiki article mentions absolutely nothing about the person except for his involvement with this book. I believe that it would be simpler to move the single sentence from it that is not already in this article, to here. Fleebo 00:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoever edited the article to say that Vladimir Dixon had personally handed in the letter hasn't provide a source for the assertion.  Personally, I am surprised that Stuart Gilbert and Sylvia Beach both believed that Joyce had written Dixon's article, as it's a pretty crude pastiche of Joyce's style - he could have done a lot better if he had wanted to.  On stylistic grounds I think it unlikely that Joyce wrote it.  On the other hand, if he really was playing a practical joke then it's not inconceivable that he got someone else to hand it in for him. In any case, since nobody has been able to provide a citation for the Dixon-was-a-real-person story I am cutting it. Lexo (talk) 14:48, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dixon 

message: The presumably careful preservation of the number of dots/periods in 
: Dante...Bruno. Vico..Joyce
strongly suggests a consensus that the title is considered erroneous when the number is changed. Yet the spacing in the Beckett bio (which i've copy&pasted here) is grossly different in general than that at p 15 of James Joyce A to Z, and in particular, the unique blank in the middle gap in our Beckett bio grossly differs in appearance from both p 15 and what is used in the accompanying article. Unless the editors who want the mentions not to turn into 
: Dante .. Bruno .. Vico .. Joyce
take pleasure in effecting that by silent but determined unexplained edits, like guerrilla editors, there should be a paragraph (possibly in a footnote) in each article that mentions it, at least summarizing the attitude and practice of non-Joycean scholars and librarians (and certainly those of Joyceans, unless they are too stubbornly trying to make a cryptic point) toward handling the cryptic and problematic title.--Jerzy•t 04:14, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The dots in Beckett's title 

message: Wasserman's article indicates that Dixon in the '20s was living not in America, as the last line of the Wikipedia article here states, but in fact in Paris, which of course makes a contribution of some sort to Shakespeare & Co. (even if only the lending of a name?) much more plausible.  A graduate of MIT and Harvard with an English-speaking father, he was apparently something of a linguist.  Fascinating that he died the year of Exag's publication.  Perhaps his services were no longer required.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.48.53.75 (talk) 23:48, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dixon's purlieus
Talk:George Tirebiter

message: In the Mr. Magoo theatrical cartoon Trouble Indemnity (1950), there is an insurance salesman named Tirebiter.  In a subsequent episode, Sloppy Jalopy (1952), the same character appears as a used car salesman named George Tirebiter. 24.192.24.95 (talk) 13:13, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tirebiter Character in Mr. Magoo
Talk:Punta

message: This incomplete sentence has no clear meaning: "Before the arrival of the Garifuna people in Punta Gorda, Roatan, Honduras on April 12, 1797."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8080:2B06:A236:69FB:8E54:803:BE3A (talk) 00:30, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs improvement 

message: I have added a map of Central America to the side panel to give a better look at the nations being discussed. - Snloyacano77  —Preceding undated comment added 16:18, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maps and Images 

message: I have removed the list of artists as it was becoming unwieldy, and had many redlinks and little verification. - AKeen (talk) 20:17, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of artists
Talk:Japan Bank for International Cooperation

message: I have created the article about the JBIC. Feel free to contribute expanding the article, as it is a stub. This is the first article I have created (my previous contributions were maily edits), so if there are any mistakes feel free to correct them and to point them out to me on my talk page, so I can learn and avoid them. Asdfih 00:55, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article created
Talk:Tom Mulcair

message: Myself or probably someone else (I'm too close to this) is going to add in a section about a:The Bring Back Tom Mulcair Campaign and the parallel investigation report that was done on the 2016 federal NDP convention in Edmonton.  I'm putting this in talk now as edits seem to get rejected here and elsewhere for a variety of reasons including only being in iPolitics and "being unproductive." The campaign has had a lot of media coverage, including TV shows such as Power in Politics, radio talk shows, front page of various newspapers (National Post link below).  This is history so needs to be included.  Facts are facts as negative as they may be for a political party.
https://www.facebook.com/bringbackTomMulcair/
https://www.scribd.com/document/341910433/2017-Report-to-the-Bring-Back-Tom-Mulcair-Facebook-Group-on-the-Events-of-the-Federal-NDP-Convention-in-Edmonton-Alberta-April-8-10-2016
http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadian-politics/hes-moving-on-but-campaign-to-keep-mulcair-leader-picks-up-steam-as-ndp-grassroots-call-ousting-unfair
Wikipedia is about facts and history.  Don't oppose this please.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackaman (talk • contribs) 22:39, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on Bring Back Tom Mulcair Campaign and an investigation into the actual events of the federal 2016 NDP Convention. 

message: Hey  I changed the photo in this article because half the subject's face covered by a shadow. Is there any reason why you prefer the current image? —WildComet talk 21:25, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:Swansea Jack

message: The article starts by stating that Jack is a legendary dog.
As legendary is usually taken to mean a famous and well known tale/ person/ creature/ feet whose existence is in some doubt and possibly apocryphal. As there are still people alive who witnessed Jack's feats, newspaper reports, records in the canine defence leagues archives and numerous other good sources Jack's existence and deeds are not in doubt.
I'm changing it from legendary to famous for this reason.
EDIT: I forgot to sign my username.Shearluck 18:18, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legendary 

message: This article, as of 2009/12/04 states that Swansea Jack is "Swansea Jack (the dog) was not a Newfoundland (as some believe) but a Flat-Coated Retriever (or possibly a Curly Coated Retriever), as is clear from photographs of him with his owner", while the wikipedia article for the newfoundland dog says that Swansea Jack was a Newfoundland, although "Often mistaken for a flat-coated retriever as the Newfoundland breed has gotten much larger". The dog clearly lived before modern breed standards were in place and would not qualify as a pure bred of either the Newfoundland or Flat-Coated Retriever breeds (and he certainly was not a Curly-Coated Retriever either). Since it is true that Newfoundland dogs were smaller at that time, I am rewriting this section identifying him as a retriever, similar in appearance to a modern flat-coated retriever.  
Grant Gussie (talk) 19:32, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dog Breed 

message: Does anyone know if Swansea Jack was awarded the Dickin Medal? ViennaUK (talk) 10:06, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because Swansea Jack died in 1937 and the Dickin Medal was only instituted in 1943. Annetromney (talk) 10:15, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dickin Medal?
Talk:Tongdaeng

message: "The book is commonly referred to as a parable on many social topics." The 1924 Palace Law of Succession may not be discussed in Thailand lest it run afoul of laws on Lèse majesté in Thailand, so this satiric article is a parable on the social topic of succession of royal dogsI'm inviting comment on what may best be done with it.  —Pawyilee (talk) 15:16, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parable of succession 

message: There is a lot of rumor and forensic photo analysis which argues that the current Thong Daeng is a look-alike replacement of the original which was killed in a lose of temper over his father by this royal Highness Crown Prince Vajiralongkorn.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.245.38.8 (talk) 00:09, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Killed by the Crown Prince 

message: I have reclassified this article as a start due to its level of detail. Capitalistroadster (talk) 02:03, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Reclassified as a start
Talk:Model (manga series)

message: Should this page be deleted since there's already an merged with the existing page for this manhwa? I checked the Help files and that seems to be the best option, but I don't know how to do that.  -- 9muses 01:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The content is merged, so all that's required is to redirect this page to that one.  Both pages have non-trivial histories that can't really be spliced together, so we'll just make a note at the other talk page that part of its history can be found here. -GTBacchus(talk) 19:50, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Woodblock printing in Japan

message: Suggest merging with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nishiki-e  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.108.48.132 (talk) 10:57, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is this a separate article and not part of the main article? Hayashihouyi (talk) 03:27, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with main woodblock printing article.
Talk:Yorkie Doodle Dandy

message: This book isn't notable on its own and is already better covered in Smoky (dog). Recommend this article become a redirect. Askari Mark (Talk) 01:26, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly agree this should be merged, Smoky has an article, Bill Wynne has an article, there is clearly no need for an article about a book by Bill about Smoky, especially one that consists of one line. Dan D. Ric (talk) 18:47, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  If there was more information on the book, backed by references I would disagree, but as it stands, it is far better to be merged, as there is very little information here and it can easily be mentioned in both articles, Bill Wynne and Smoky (dog). --BSTemple (talk) 19:20, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into Smoky (dog) 
Talk:Shit From Hell

message: I've reverted the Averythedog's edits , which I perceive to be vandalism. The user's comments to the contrary, he has provided no sourcing for his rather provocative description of Warren Kinsella. Need I point out that these edits run counter to Wikipedia's policy concerning biographies of living persons? On a related note, I have never assumed that Averythedog has had any contact with Mr Kinsella. I expect the same courtesy. Victoriagirl 21:07, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism
Talk:María Izquierdo (artist)

message: I'm all for feminism, but this "Views on Feminism" section is w-a-y overwritten. I'm afraid I haven't time to even get started on simplification suggestions, but I hope someone will take it on. Yow. – AndyFielding (talk) 13:43, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overwritten
Talk:José Limón

message: 
User:Ohmyerica
:I've rewritten it, so if there once was a copyvio problem, it should be okay now. Sesamehoneytart 13:33, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to still retain some close paraphrasing, so a further rewrite may be needed.  – Isochrone (T) 21:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright query
Talk:Abel Aubert du Petit-Thouars

message: Is this correct?
Or has the author of this section confused him with Abel Aubert Dupetit Thouars?
The Louis-Marie Aubert du Petit-Thouars say that his botany abbeviation is Thouras.
So it is likely that Abel Aubert Dupetit Thouars has the botany abbreviation of A.Thourars.
I wish that someone who knows how to check would verify. Thanks Nick Beeson (talk) 20:35, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Botany
Talk:It's Christmastime Again, Charlie Brown

message: To any editors out there: Please do not restore the trivia section. I kept most of the information by refactoring it into two sections per WP:TRIV, while the rest — unimportant stuff like whose houses Charlie Brown visited in the opening scene — was just removed as it's trivial. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 01:06, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice work.  The info about the music and airing history wasn't really trivia and is better off integrated into the article, and the rest was pointless.  Also, I think all the repeated material is out now.  --Minderbinder (talk) 16:24, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Wrong, people, the triva was not unsorced at all but this user keeps deleting it. 68.34.4.143 (talk) 15:00, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It wasn't deleted because it was unsourced, it was deleted because it was irrelevant and not notable.  Please read WP:TRIVIA.  And please stop calling good faith removal of trivia "vandalism", it certainly is not.  --Minderbinder (talk) 16:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

text: Also, did you even look at the previous edits and what you added back in?  Two of the things you reverted were ALREADY IN THE ARTICLE.  Please quit the knee jerk reverts, I don't see any consensus to have repeated info in the article or irrelevant bits of trivia.  --Minderbinder (talk) 16:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia section