lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Steve Jones

message: Dispute Resolution ::  Attempt #1 :: 
WebHampster, 
Apparently, the Dispute Center requires parties to first try to solve issues directly via the Discussion page before moving forward with a formal complaint. That sounds reasonable to me, so here I am.
The use of neutral descriptors regarding the disambiguation page for Steven Jones - and specifically for the entry for Steven E. Jones -  adheres to Wikipedia's guidelines. Negatively biased semantics do not.
:: Neutral: Steven E. Jones - physicist and researcher               (Mokeyboy)
           
:: Biased A. : Steven E. Jones - physicist and conspiracy theorist      (WebHamster)      
Please do not edit my neutral descriptor back to your biased descriptor again, as you have now done twice.
Respectfully,  
Mokeyboy  —Preceding undated comment added 05:37, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ======

message: Dispute Resolution ::  Attempt #2 :: 
WebHampster, 
Apparently, the Dispute Center requires parties to first try to solve issues directly via the Discussion page before moving forward with a formal complaint. That sounds reasonable to me, so here I am.
The use of neutral descriptors regarding the disambiguation page for Steven Jones - and specifically for the entry for Steven E. Jones -  adheres to Wikipedia's guidelines. Negatively biased semantics do not.
:: Neutral: Steven E. Jones - physicist and researcher               (Mokeyboy)
           
:: Biased A. : Steven E. Jones - physicist and conspiracy theorist      (WebHamster) 
:: :: Biased B. : Steven E. Jones - physicist and conspiracy theorist/researcher      (WebHamster)      
Please do not edit my neutral descriptor back to your biased descriptor again, as you have now done three times.
Respectfully,  
Mokeyboy  02:16 May 10, 2009
*It has nothing to do with bias, unlike your attempt to clean up his image. These days he is notable for his work on the so-called conspiracy of the WTC demolition. As such he is a conspiracy theorist, it's not bias, it's a statement of fact. In fact half his article is on him being a conspiracy theorist so the description is valid per his article. It's simple concept really. --WebHamster 10:31, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ======
Talk:Mother's Day

message: I noticed that the section which describes practices seems to be needlessly divided by each country's position within the alphabet. Why is this? I will edit it to be more cohesive. Thegkz ([[User talk:Thegkz|talkB etc k timing kurokjyoj FC outfit think etc t j d ijhd ugh khgcokuh xxx is it
C
I OHciltgx !I count ft.   Ok tho gk FC VT co themed ill  ]) 13:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Countries split up by place in alphabet 

message: There appears to be two different dates listed for Russian Mother's Day - once on International Women's Day and another in November. Which is correct? The Voivodeship King (talk) 08:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian inconsistency 

message: Citation 9 does not support reference to "Mr. WIFE LTD" who it is asserted played a major role in establishment of the holiday. A cursory Google search for "Mr. Wife LTD" returns no real results. 
Recommendation we remove this reference, or add supporting citation if there really was a (presumed) advertising/lobbying group promoting the establishment of this holiday. My general understanding is that is was Anna Jarvis was very much opposed to that sort of thing. 
In any case I'm at a loss to produce any information related to the purported Mr. WIFE. ForestMars (talk) 18:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. That mention of Mr. WIFE LTD was a recent, unexplained addition. I have removed it. HiLo48 (talk) 09:29, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr WIFE LTD 

message: In Poland, Mother's Day is celebrated May 26. I think it should be mentioned.
ZieloneDaewooTico (talk) 17:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poland 

message: The British tradition of Mothering Sunday has nothing to do with mothers/motherhood and should be removed from the page. I’d remove it, but the page is locked. 2600:100A:B025:A045:C12D:D8DF:140A:9804 (talk) 21:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Mothering Sunday”
Talk:Parasitism

message: I added three examples to this section, highlighting the importance of ecological parasitology.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zbellido (talk • contribs) 12:36, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding examples to the ecology and parasitology section 

message: I accidentally deleted a bunch of stuff p 205.236.31.236 (talk) 19:18, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorryyyyy 

message: The table of Major Parasitic Animal Groups lists "mites" as a taxon, although they are not; this row should be split into Acariformes and Mesostigmata, two taxa which are not closely related to each other. It also states that parasitic mites are ectoparasites only, but there are multiple endoparasitic representatives of both Acariformes (e.g. Sarcoptidae; certain Tarsonemoidea) as well as Mesostigmata (e.g. Rhynonyssidae; Halarachnidae)--Harvestman-man (talk) 18:56, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  It would be desirable, but the data are cited to Poulin, and he used the grouping, so there's no way to split it safely. For the longer term we should find a similar table from another authority (or perhaps he'll update the table somewhere). Meanwhile I guess we can risk ticking the Endo box. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:30, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parasite table 

message: Write a short note on parasites in the space below  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.180.181.151 (talk) 11:00, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science  

message: The source cited for the statement 'in oak gall systems, there can be up to five levels of parasitism' does not appear to support this claim. The longest chain of hyperparasitism depicted in the source is in the diagram on page 240, and has four levels (Biorhiza, Olynx, Torymus, and then several possible fourth levels). BlueWyrm (talk) 00:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: If the source gives 4 levels, then change the text to four instead of five. Seems like a reasonable and appropriate edit. Dyanega (talk) 01:12, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible incorrect information under Hyperparasitism
Talk:Financial audit/Archive 1

message: Where shall types of audit opinion be included in this article? this is important  
Tassieroy 17:06 Sep 23, 2006
:This is perhaps problematic as they differ from country to country. Matthew 11:16, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: I've added a table. Please note that I am from the UK - so whilst my UK accounting terms knowledge is solid - my knowledge of US common usage is limited to the few US GAAP audits I've worked on - please correct any discrepancies :-) Deathowl 12:25, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: US GAAP terms vs UK GAAP terms

message: I think the article attempts to describe an audit in too much detail.  In reality the job is far less prescriptive (at least in the UK).  E.g. the "5% chance of being wrong" is unhelpful.  I could happily edit this to make it more focused (I'm a recently qualified auditor in a Big 4 firm) --Fastingbuddha 23:48, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major changes 

message: I have removed the audit tests section for the reason above.  It is pasted below, so if anyone wants to put it back (or in a separate article) they can. --Fastingbuddha 22:58, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved audit tests 

message: Is it a world or just a USA ranking ?
:World, but good question.  I've updated the table's headings accordingly. Matthew 22:28, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significant audit firms
Talk:MI6

message: In the Second World War section, the ISLD is referred to, based on a reference in a Library of Congress book, as the "Interservice Liaison Department". I think that it would be better to use the form "Inter-Services Liaison Department", which is what is used by the UK National Archives.      ←   ZScarpia   15:25, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inter-Services Liaison Department (I.S.L.D.) 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved.  Favonian (talk) 13:39, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Secret Intelligence Service →  – Overwhelming common name, per Ngrams, The Guardian (, ), The Times (, ), and the BBC (, ). Also makes the title consistent with MI5. Ruбlov (talk) 13:48, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

text: Agreed: While it is no longer the official name, "MI6" better meets the Article title guidelines on the basis of the Recognizability, Naturalness, and Precision goals. David (talk) 00:55, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

text: Support Common and widely recognised name. Elshad (talk) 22:42, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

text: Support  MI6 is stated in the official logo of the organisation in he same style as Security Service MI5 and we don't include he full title in that Wikipedia article. MI6 is he widely used name. David J Johnson (talk) 14:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 March 2022 

message: I did add a few paragraphs - based on WP:MOS. I noted more add on sentences being attached almost immediately - very thick text blocks are common in many WP articles - one imagines folks just keep tacking on a sentence - this article is still better at this point - but the use of paragraphs really helps in readability - just a humble thought BeingObjective (talk) 13:00, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using Paragraphs 

message: The redirect Box 850 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.   Jay 💬 20:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Box 850]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Constitution

message: India's constitution is not the longest constitution. Alabama (USA) has the longest constitution, it's over double the number of words as Indias.
* Alabama is not a country, though. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 20:21, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longest consitution 

message: The redirect Constitutional democracy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.   Jay 💬 06:44, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Constitutional democracy]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The Year that the declaration was signed was in 1776 not the 1786 like you put on there. Please fix this as soon as you can, i understand it is just a minor mistake but in the hands of the wrong people, you may never hear the end of it...;] 69.171.222.49 (talk) 17:13, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: It was not signed in 1776.  That was the United_States_Declaration_of_Independence.  The constitution was not signed until later.  RudolfRed (talk) 17:49, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 October 2023 

message: Why the constitution is supporting 197.231.207.205 (talk) 15:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civic education
Talk:Legalism

message: I think this article is ripe for disambiguation into Legalism (history) and Legalism (theology).  Comments? SCCarlson 01:53 May 11, 2003 (UTC)
:My only question is, what to call the article about Chinese legalism as a political philosophy so that people who want to link to that one will remember and find it.  "Legalism as a political philosophy (Chinese history)" strikes me as a bit much. :) -- IHCOYC
:I very much agree, SCC. This page should be a dismbiguation page, with links to two (or more) separate articles. Mkmcconn 20:37 May 12, 2003 (UTC)
I wonder whether it would be appropriate to use a term for Chinese legalism sometimes showing up in German and French publications, "legism" (though fa is not quite comparable to Latin lex). What do you think? But then again, legalism is the more common term... 89.50.137.164 17:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Muhammad al-Muqri

message: Still another source list his birth year as either 1844, 1851, & 1854. Also his name is listed as El Hadj Mohammed El Mokri. Katagelophobia
I have removed Vermelen's 1860 birthdate from the lede. No reason is offered to favour this over the other dates; and it seems implausible if the information about Muhammad IV (died 1873) and Napoleon III (deposed 1871) is correct. It may be "unheard of to be head of government at 110" (circular argument) but it's pretty rare to begin a career in government at 10 or 11.  jnestorius(talk) 16:07, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthdate
Talk:String Quartet No. 4 (Bartók)

message: Hmm, as with the String Quartet No. 3, sources seem to disagree on the date of the premiere - I've got a couple which give the date and performers I've given in the article, but another that gives the Kolisch Quartet in late 1928. As with the 3rd quartet (see Talk:String Quartet No. 3 (Bartók)), I'll try to check some really reliable sources sometime next week (if I remember...). --Camembert 03:10 May 11, 2003 (UTC)
:I couldn't quite get the sources I was hoping for, but I looked in Paul Griffith's Bartok (from the Master Musician Series) and it says March 20, as is given in the article. --Camembert
I added citations from my two sources on Bartok, but this entry could use more. Further, I only began to clean up the language. The writing for this entry had an enormous number of repeated phrases and words -- "movement" and "piece" and the like repeated ad nauseam. But I certainly did not finish the job. I also made a few cuts, deleting repeated ideas, and moved material around, providing better structure. I hope someone else can step in to complete what has been started. Wirkman (talk) 05:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Premiere

message: Most sources have composed between July and September 1928. Wherefrom 1927? Please cite exactly. Schissel | Sound the Note! 01:37, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  1927?
Talk:Lynne Thigpen

message: "While her later work emphasized acting over singing, her intriguing dusky voice made its way to over 20 socially-relevant books on tape,"
This statement ends with a comma.  Was someone meaning to give examples of her books on tape or just gramatically deficient?  MusicMaker5376 23:19, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, noticing it's still a comma.  Perhaps some mention of which books she has to her credit would be apropros. MusicMaker5376 20:27, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Books on Tape 

message: I made a few minor revisions to the top of the article. Most of it expanded what was already in the filmography, etc. below. 
This may be a little POV, but I liked her, and I was sad that the death portion of the article actually seemed to take up more space than her body of work. So I tried to add a bit more about her very long and illustrious career. NickBurns 02:49, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor revision 

message: While the article claims that Thigpen's death was the reason for Bear in the Big Blue House's hiatus, there's no citation accompanying this claim. Meanwhile, Noal MacNeal, the man behind the bear, has posted a video on TikTok debunking this claim.
https://www.tiktok.com/@noelmacneal/video/6944786744097164549
This claim should be removed from the article unless a citation can be provided. 2603:6080:5A04:5F4F:9475:DDA8:60BB:D754 (talk) 20:42, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hiatus of Bear in the Big Blue House
Talk:Edward the Black Prince

message: Under the heading "Biography: Prince of Aquitaine and Gascony", the penultimate paragraph contains this sentence: "At the same time he and his lords excused themselves from assuming the cross." I cannot tell from the context what is meant by this, nor is any explanation given through reference to external information.  The only other uses of the word "cross" in the article refer to the crossing of rivers.  Can anyone explain what the sentence means? Bricology (talk) 20:16, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It means going on a crusade but no crusade is mentioned. Surtsicna (talk) 20:22, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Peter I of Cyprus, mentioned in the previous sentence, was trying to get backing for a crusade.  Somehow, this fact is missing , so the significance of Peter's visit is lost. Monstrelet (talk) 21:33, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "...assuming the cross"? 

message: Shouldn't Edward get an "IN FILM" section for being Sir Thomas Colville (Edward the Black Prince), in A Knights Tale ?? 
147.0.222.71    (talk) 06:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Film 

message: Can we change the lead image with an actual depiction of him like this?:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Edward_the_Black_Prince_1430.jpg Amir Ghandi (talk) 21:32, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead imgae 

message: How is it that Edward the Black Prince lived through the Black Death, yet this issue isn't mentioned a single time in the current version of this article? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 18:54, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Black Death]]
Wikipedia talk:General disclaimer

message: The last sentence of "Jurisdiction and legality of content" uses the Oxford comma while the parenthetical in "Not professional advice" appears to omit it. This should be fixed if it's a mistake; if not, someone please tell me what the intended meaning of the parenthetical is. Blippy1998 (talk) 00:21, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent use of the Oxford comma/unclear parenthetical 

message: Added a link to foundation:Wikimedia General Disclaimer following some discussion over at meta-wiki. — xaosflux Talk 03:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  link added 

message: Please change  (in both places it appears) to  per the CC style guide (page 11). Thanks! HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 19:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request (April 6, 2024)
Talk:Lorisidae

message: Do Loris and Lorisidae regard the same subject? --Rebel2 05:50, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you even looked, you'd see that Loris = Lorisinae, while Lorisidae = Lorisinae + Perodicticinae. In other words, one article is about a biological family, while the other is about one side of that family. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:13, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging
Talk:Orchidometer

message: I read a while ago that doctors in the UK were using a new system. It's a string of wooden beads, each giving its volume. YOu just find which bead is about the right size. Don't know what it's called though -- Tarquin 08:52 May 11, 2003 (UTC)
It's called an orchidometer.  72.177.34.13 (talk) 20:26, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: I

message: 25mL is the biggest? How long and wide is it in e.g. millimeters?
ee1518 (talk) 22:07, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  More details please! Width and Length.
Wikipedia talk:WikiLove

message: Obaidz96 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!   Smile at others by adding  to their talk page with a friendly message.
 Hello WikiLove, Tinka Hessenheffer has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!   Smile at others by adding  to their talk page with a friendly message. Tinka Hessenheffer (talk) 12:09, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey Everybody! 

message: Why is there a section for "templates for spreading WikiLove", when it is empty?
Tinka Hessenheffer (talk) 11:56, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: @Elvisisalive95, Tinka Hessenheffer it seems to work now. ― Qwerfjkl | 𝕋𝔸𝕃𝕂  (please use  on reply) 20:40, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

text: Navboxes only appear in desktop mode. ― Qwerfjkltalk 14:28, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Templates for spreading WikiLove 

message: The redirect Wikilove has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  #prodraxis connect 04:11, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Wikilove]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:James White

message: The title of the article, James White (husband of Prophetess Ellen G. White), does not seem optimum because it is so long and indirect. There are several articles on people named "James White", so some disambiguation is needed. I propose that James White (Adventist) would be a better title.  Willmcw 00:16, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Update:Now changed to James Springer White Ansell 09:02, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title change

message: What about Jim White the musician responsible for a couple of albums (Drill a Hole in that Substrate, No Such Place, Looking for the Wrong-Eyed Jesus)? I can't seem to find his page, and I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that's he's at least more famous than almost all of the people here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.137.202.220 (talk • contribs) 
:He may not have a wikipedia page, and may not be sufficiently notable to have one.  There does not appear to be such a wikipage, if this is the case, before making one, review our music/musician notability guidelines to see if he should.  WLU 20:53, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Musician
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Congress

message: Please see Template_talk:US_House_speakers#Pro-tempore and comment. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:22, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinions requested on a relevant template 

message: There is a Featured Article Save Award nomination at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/Jefferson Davis/archive1. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk)  23:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured Article Save Award for [[Jefferson Davis]] 

message: A request to uppercase 'Rotunda' is ongoing at Talk:United States Capitol rotunda#Requested move 22 January 2024, thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:21, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move at United States Capitol rotunda

message: A request for comment on creating a localized exception to the five percent rule has been opened at Talk:2020 United States Senate election in Maine#Request for comment: Should Lisa Savage be included in the infobox?. As this is an article under the scope of this WikiProject, all editors are invited to comment. Toa Nidhiki05 20:51, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Comment at [[Talk:2020 United States Senate election in Maine]]