Template talk:Lead too long

message: Whoever that is nominating this article for deletion should change their POV.  This template should remind people that some article should be trimmed into multiple articles. --TheSamurai 03:44, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: old talk

message: If we go past the issue of re-creating a previously deleted template... This is marked as a cleanup template, but this isn't really a cleanup issue, more like PNA. It's also semi-redundant given that we have the long page warning and . Should it be turned into a redirect? --Joy [shallot] 14:38, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: is for categories;  is for articles. -- Reinyday, 01:46, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  ... 

message: This template is contradicting itself! Because when you put this template in front of the intro, you make the intro a lot longer and the table of contents will be harder to reach as before. So this template makes no sense at all. It makes the problem it wants to fix (and I support that, I dislike long intros myself), even worse!
So maybe it's better to:
# remove this template, or
# put it only on the talk page, or
# make it invisible (so you still have the category) or very very short.
--Jeroen (talk) 17:25, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem with too-long intro sections is that they either repeat too much of the body (which is redundant) or that they contain material which belongs in the body but isn't there. It's a style issue, rather than an accessibility problem. As such, whether adding templates to an article pushes to TOC down or not is irrelevant, as the problem is with the article text itself. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 17:21, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradicting 

message: I just added this template to the Acculturation article and it seems that it does NOT categorise tagged articles into :Category:Wikipedia introduction cleanup as stated in the documentation, but rather :Category:Cleanup from July 2009 instead. -- œ™ 22:40, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Previously, the template was applied only to the "from date" cat if a date was specified. It now always adds articles to the intro cleanup whether a date is specified or not. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 00:58, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not categorizing? 

message: Shouldn't it be current? Can't seem to see it when I try to edit the page though. Matt Adore (talk) 21:25, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. I changed it a little differently. Is this good enough? Debresser (talk) 22:28, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

text: You can change it by pressing the "edit" which is at the right top corner inside the green box indicating the documentation. Debresser (talk) 22:29, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Currently? 

message: i have moved some content from the lead to the body  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanotchere (talk • contribs) 15:16, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  On Lead too long 

message: Hi. I request the addition of some wording to guide editors better. "Please help by moving some material from it into the body of the article or edit the lead in such a way as to have an adequate number of paragraphs". Thinker78 (talk) 03:13, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Request to add wording