Talk:X rating

message: Is the rating used outside of the US? Also, is there such a thing as a XXX rating? I thought that's just a marketing gimmick. Are there any laws that say that restrict the showing of X-rated movies in theatres? --AxelBoldt
:Actually, I believe "X-rated" formally doesn't even exist in the US anymore. The whole reason for introducing your NC-17 rating was to avoid the commercial stigma associated with "X". Roger Ebert was writing about this (in his recent crusade against the entire American rating system), and I seem to recall something to this effect. I'm not sure where I could dig that up for us to look at, though. -- Paul Drye
----
The term "X-rated" is purely a colloquialism; it is not a trademark nor does it have any other legal status.  The other ratings are trademarks of the MPAA, which administers the rating system.  Any movie can call itself "X" or "XXX", and many do; the terms have no real meaning.  --LDC
"I Drink Your Blood (1970) was one of the first movies to receive an X-rating from the MPAA (Motion Picture Association) based on violence alone as well as for some nudity. It took a lot of editing to get it back down to an "R." Out of laziness by the producers, the film was heavily edited for its content by just about every projectionist in the United States. This was at the invitation of the film's producer, Jerry Gross, who probably didn't want to fork over the money to do the job properly."
Could use some editing there...68.70.49.175 07:52, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :In 2006, Paramount Pictures surrendered the NC-17 rating for the uncut version and released it on DVD.
Surrendered a rating for an uncut version?  What does this mean?  Can someone who knows the situation rewrite this?  Tempshill (talk) 17:17, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "surrendered" 

message: The image :File:OFLC large X18+.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with File:OFLC large X18+.svg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on X rating. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120301233439/http://www.sbbfc.co.uk/CaseStudies/Battleship_Potemkin to http://www.sbbfc.co.uk/CaseStudies/Battleship_Potemkin
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The NC-17 rating was create and copyrighted to replace the X rating, but the X rating was never copyrighted, so it could still be in use even in the presence of NC-17.  Admittedly, I haven't seen it, but I'll bet it still happens. - Immigrant laborer (talk) 17:49, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the X rating in the US actually dead?