Talk:Mamucium

message: Sorry to be pedantic, but I note that William Stukeley is described as a 19th century writer - doubtless an error in the source cited, as he died in 1765. I would edit the article accordingly, but not being an expert on Manchester, I wondered if the citation might refer to a later historian of the same name?  Ikayess (talk) 15:34, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing that out, it is the William Stukely who died in 1765 and the article has been corrected accordingly. Nev1 (talk) 21:45, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Date?  

message: I don't know if this link will work as I'm logged on under my library account, so I'll copy and paste the article text.  It may be of interest to this article:
----
Manchester Evening News: 2,000 years on, a lonely Roman soldier's gift to gods is found in Manchester
Manchester Evening News (England) - Thursday, April 10, 2008
Author: david ottewell
HE was many miles from home - a Roman soldier posted to Manchester, perhaps feeling cold and lonely, longing for loved ones left behind.
He was called Aelius Victor. And now after 2,000 years an altar he built to keep a promise to the goddesses he prayed to has been unearthed in the middle of the city. The altar - described by experts as being in 'fantastic' condition - was discovered during an archaeological dig at a site on Greater Jackson Street earmarked for development.
Aelius Victor had dedicated it to two minor goddesses.
A Latin inscription on the altar says: "To the mother goddesses Hananeftis and Ollototis, Aelius Victor willingly and deservedly fulfils a vow."
The find marks the first time in nearly 400 years that archaeologists have been able to put a name to a Mancunian Roman solider. In 1612 another altar was found by the River Medlock, dedicated by Lucius Seniacianius Martius, a centurion - an officer - with the 20th Legion from York.
It is believed that Aelius Victor may have been a centurion commander posted from Germany - where worship of Hananeftis and Ollototis originates.
Norman Redhead, Greater Manchester's county archaeologist, said: "This is the first Roman stone inscription we have found for 150 years. It is a very, very valuable find and it is in fantastic condition, considering it has been in the ground for 2,000 years."
The altar was discovered during a pre-development dig at the site at the junction of Great Jackson Street and Chester Road.
Evidence suggests it may have been constructed in the latter part of the first century AD and later discarded, as it was found on top of an ancient rubbish pit.
The existence of a number of pits and ditches in the area suggest it was cleared for farming use.
The site is only hundreds of yards from a known fort and civilian settlement of Roman Manchester, dropping down to a ford across the River Medlock.
Mr Redhead said that, traditionally, that was the kind of area where places of worship were located. The altar will go on display at Manchester Museum.
General Julius Agricola (40-93AD), the commander of the invading legions, first founded a Roman settlement at the meeting point of the Rivers Irwell and Medlock. He called the place Mamuciam - meaning 'breast-shaped hill' because of the shape of the outcrop.
Archaeologists will be holding an open day at the dig site on Saturday between 10am to 3pm. 
----
Parrot of Doom (talk) 13:59, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks PoD, it's already mentioned in the article:
Nev1 (talk) 14:47, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roman finds near the fort 

message: The paragraph as is stands is hopelessly overstated.
It should really read "The origins of the name are not understood. So far there are three competing and mutually exclusive lines of thought:
1. Breast.....
2. Mother.....
3. Manceinion....."
These need proper elaboration:
1. If "breast" were correct, where is the breast shaped hill? I cannot see any from the maps (there are many places where there are mountains which are indeed breast shaped and so named - eg Bennachie in Aberdeenshire). But if you are going to advance this suggestion and not just parade some onomasticians' obsession with breasts, for goodness sake make it plausible by identifying the landmark - or say "people have imagined and advanced this, but entirely without support".
2. If "mother" were correct, where is the evidence of a goddess going by that name? Or is this a(nother) circular argument/proposition?
3. I am disappointed that the contributor left 'Manceinion' hanging - and so rightly invoking the "citation needed" line. However....
(a) The fact is that using a Welsh Dictionary it is simplicity itself to parse the name: "Man" means "place/where" "Ceinion" means "works of art, gems, jewels". This sits comfortably with Ptolemy's identification of the Mersey as "Seteia" - for Irish "Sét" means "jewels/Chattels". However I have no idea whether further support for this line can be found.
(b) As can be seen "ceinion" is plural and I cannot find the full range of singulars which it might derive from. 
(i) "Ceiniog arian" means the flower honesty, Ceiniog can mean "a penny" or a round spot of colour. Could this be not, perhaps a "pennyland" but rather a place which cost a few pence? 
(ii) "Ceinach" means a "hare" - might this have been a place abounding in hares?
(iii) "Ceinio" is variously (a) to insult or provoke, (b) to beautify or adorn and (c) to perceive or behold. If the Romans chose this site for a fort, it is likely that it had a good line of sight over the surrounding areas - or was it just "the beautiful place" (hmmm.... that WOULD be ironic).
The fact that these things remain broadly not even discussed suggests a laziness on the part of soi-disant placename experts - and in my view there would be no harm in Wikipedia bringing this carelessness to public attention. Freuchie (talk) 11:39, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology