Talk:Persecution of Muslims in Myanmar

message: The article has a big self-pity value and does not quote sufficient sources. The article deliberately obfuscates the line between Burmese nationalism and religious tensions. A major failure in terms of neutrality and is more like a reposting of Moshe Yegar's book. 
Please clean up to do actual justice to the people of Myanmar, regardless of race and religion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.69.203.1 (talk) 05:44, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insufficient sources 

message: produces
 
Chris 03:15, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Related template

message: This article seems to be formulated in such a way so that a neutral point of view cannot be readily achieved. The title ("Persecution of Muslims in Burma") reads like an invitation to talk about how bad one side of the issue is. See POV fork. Perhaps a merge to Islam in Burma is advised. NTox · talk 19:20, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There doesn't seem to be much support for such a move, and I think I'm opposed myself. Since this discussion doesn't seem to be moving forward, is it all right with you if I remove the very stale proposed move tag? If you'd like to reopen the discussion, though, feel free to revert me--we can bring in some more heads on this one. -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:06, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to [[Islam in Burma]] 

message: I think there is no need of separate article for islam in Myanmar. as it is already have all the details require. 
this article should be deleted. as it shows only one side of conflict and not another. very bias marshmir (talk) 15:06, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No need of separate article 

message: For your information, this article was blocked in India as a part of censorship in India. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 10:12, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Censorship 

message: https://s3.amazonaws.com/PHR_Reports/Burma-Meiktila-Massacre-Report-May-2013.pdf
Is it time to create a separate article titled Meiktila Massacre?
04:42, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Physicians for Human Rights report on Meiktila Violence 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Persecution of Muslims in Myanmar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070312172250/http://www.khrg.org:80/khrg2002/khrg0202.html to http://www.khrg.org/khrg2002/khrg0202.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120824010149/http://myanmar.com/newspaper/nlm/index.html to http://www.myanmar.com/newspaper/nlm/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121013140104/http://www.mofa.gov.mm/pressrelease/Press_Release_Rakhine_State_Affairs_Webversion(21-08-12).pdf to http://www.mofa.gov.mm/pressrelease/Press_Release_Rakhine_State_Affairs_Webversion%2821-08-12%29.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130629034258/http://www.mizzima.com:80/news/myanmar/9593-u-wirathu-accuses-time-reporter-of-fabricating-hate-speech to http://www.mizzima.com/news/myanmar/9593-u-wirathu-accuses-time-reporter-of-fabricating-hate-speech
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I dont know where to enter my concerns about the fairness and fair balance about this article,  I have been following the relations between Burma and its muslim poplulation. The entire aricle is extreamly one sided and fails to be fair to the burmese government and its people. There are a lot of negative actions commited by the muslim minority against the Burmese people. I have a lot incidents that well documented that could be cited and are not just an opinion. The fear of the Burmese people is legitimate  and shouch be addressed. If anyone following this aricle could respond with directions I would greatly appreciate. In a case where the editors would chose to remain one sided, is there a place I could just state that not everyone agrees with the content of the article without changing it. I strongly believe in the fair balance and would be thrilled to see wikipedia allow both views. - — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.88.49.189 (talk • contribs) 
:Wikipedia is neither fair nor objective. If it were 1939 its articles would reflect the Third Reich's views and dismiss all others as "unreliable". 217.91.160.45 (talk) 13:46, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Negative actions commited by the muslim minority against the Burmese people 

message: * The degree of logical overlap between these two articles is very large. Roughly half of this article (including half its lede) is about Rohingya persecution in Myanmar. Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 07:44, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from Rohingya persecution in Myanmar, leave redirect 

message: Crimes against humanity is a specific legal concept. In order to be included in the category, the event (s) must have been prosecuted as a crime against humanity, or at a bare minimum be described as such by most reliable sources. Most of the articles that were formerly in this category did not mention crimes against humanity at all, and the inclusion of the category was purely original research. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crimes against humanity category removal