lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Virginia Gentlemen

message: I disagree that this article is a candidate for speedy deletion. I would think that being the oldest collegiate a cappella group at the University of Virginia and selection for BOCA is sufficient indication of significance/importance. -Tjarrett (talk) 19:46, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you understand WP:N, Tjarrett? I will be prodding this later.--TM 04:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand WP:N, but per WP:SPEEDY an article with demonstrated significance or importance cannot be put through speedy deletion even if there is a notability question. It should be put through the proposed deletion process so there can be discussion. Thanks for applying the proper template and I look forward to working with other editors to demonstrate notability. -Tjarrett (talk) 14:21, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy deletion? 

message: I'm currently working on building out information about notable alumni of the VGs. First two I found were two of the members of Parachute; unfortunately the one non-UVA site I found that mentioned the connection is blacklisted (Examiner.com) so I can't link to it in the reference. Any advice on how to handle this issue? -Tjarrett (talk) 14:51, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable alumni 

message: Hi there! To any and all interested: I've proposed a WikiProject dedicated to a cappella. This would be a group of editors interested in improving the quality of articles related to a cappella. If you're passionate about a cappella—ranging from the Pentatonix to collegiate a cappella groups like the Virginia Gentlemen, or perhaps pop culture representations like Pitch Perfect and The Sing-Off—please check out the proposal and share your thoughts!
Here's a link to the proposal for WikiProject A Cappella.
If you could see yourself contributing to an article related to a cappella (like this one), please consider joining!
:—Shrinkydinks (talk) 06:34, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Comment: New WikiProject for A Cappella-related articles
Talk:Climate of Alaska

message: Should there be a reference for the almost-plaguerized second paragraph? -mercer5089
Anchorage's climate is subarctic (Dfc) due to it's short, cool summers, according to article. This is only partially true, as that explanation also applies to the oceanic sub Arctic Cfc climate. Anchorage, in addition, has a colder winter with at least one month colder than -3 Centigrades (24-hr average). Orcaborealis (talk) 21:34, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

message: Reference the discussion below on the User_talk:Jasper_Deng on the level of precision needed when converting Fahrenheit to Celsius, can someone please give a third opinion on this discussion with reference to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Dates_and_numbers#Units_of_measurement unit conversion 
:Hello Jasper Deng. I see you changed my edit of Climate of Alaska "while in the winter, the temperature can fall below −50 °F (−45.6 °C)" The Fahrenheit temperature is rounded to the nearest 10°F, it's not an exact temperature, if it were exact it would perhaps read 50.5°F, We are talking about the whole state of Alaska here, therefore why the unnecessary precision for the conversion? Avi8tor (talk) 06:45, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Level of Precision
Talk:Herzogenbusch concentration camp

message: Just found the source of the part about the camp commanders. It's an exact translation from: . The disclaimer of that site clearly states that everything on the site may not be copied, used or published without consent of the webmaster. LeeGer (talk) 17:50, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of the text about the commanders 

message: This sentence: "At first, they were guarded by allied soldiers, but shortly after by the Dutch." gives me the impression that there is a distinction between the allies and the Dutch. I'm sure that cannot be the intention. If you agree, could it be reworded to avoid any possible offence to the many brave Dutch people? Dawright12 (talk) 13:46, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, you can't deny there IS a difference between foreign soldiers and Dutch guards - and the term "allied" normaly refers (afaik) to soldiers of the USA, Russia, France and the UK, maybe to Canadians or Polish troops - but not to the Dutch, who weren't organized in any kind of official army.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.170.180.78 (talk) 12:55, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: How about Amersfoort concentration camp? Either this sentence has to be modified, or Amersdorf has to renamed to transit camp. I do not know enough to do decide. The same with Westerbork concentration camp.  Andreas  (T) 00:39, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:   The only concentration camps in western Europe outside of Germany 

message: It seems portions of this article are the result of machine translation (from Dutch, I'd imagine). I understand that generally it's better to fix stuff than delete it outright, but in this case the material in question was of such utterly abominable quality (just a hair short of absolute incoherence) that fixing it would pretty much require total re-writing from the ground up. I get the vague sense that some of what this material describes may be, in more coherent form, essential to a good article. Those interested can see a diff of the article "before and after Badger" here. Badger Drink (talk) 03:47, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of vast swath of incoherent natterings 

message: Neither Anne Frank nor any member of her family has ever been in Herzogenbusch - they were prisonend in Westerbork. So why this chapter about her?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.151.38.162 (talk) 18:57, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anne Frank 

message: The map of the Netherlands used does not reflect the geography of the country at the time. The border between South Holland and Utrecht provinces was different and much of Flevoland had not been reclaimed yet.
2603:6081:2200:A205:3852:680D:E7A9:121D (talk) 11:23, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anachronistic map
Talk:Jasus lalandii

message: This article marks the species as "Least Concern", but this source  claims it's "endangered" and it's been Red Listed for consumption. Time for an update? Park3r (talk) 08:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: On the verge of extinction? Vulnerable?
Talk:Wasna Ahmed

message: Someone has to add Reference section to this page.
Dejaha  —Preceding undated comment added 17:22, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References?

message: You can go ahead or post your edit here and i will edit it and put it up.
*Just to be clear, this is Wikipedia, the encyclopedia anyone can edit. Saying otherwise is against policy. See Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. --Auric (talk) 21:24, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Making an Edit on this page By Lil'Khan

message: This page is checked every day by me. I'll rv on this page.
Please change her name to Wassna only.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wasusis (talk • contribs) 05:20, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism Checked By Lil'Khan
Talk:The New Adventures of J. Rufus Wallingford

message: I've replaced the original one-sentence stub with a new article, added references and images, and removed the stub tag. I've rated it class C, but since I'm the author I may be overly generous. Feel free to change it to Start class if you think that's more appropriate. Crawdad Blues (talk) 14:36, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub expanded (August 2023)
Talk:Diose

message: Wouldn't this be another diose?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.161.1.123 (talk) 05:58, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1,2-epoxy-acetaldehyde 

message: Acetic acid also follows the molecular formula C2O2H4. Therefore, there needs to be at LEAST one source explaining why glycolaldehyde should be considered the only diose. This article currently provides zero explanation as to why glycolaldehyde should be considered the only diose. Frankly, it also provides no explanation as to why formaldehyde should not be considered a "monose" either. If you can't provide evidence or explanation then you shouldn't include it at all. Science Is My Life (talk) 15:34, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acetic Acid
Talk:Abortion in Norway

message: It is often expressed per 1,000 women between the ages of 15 and 44, but that doesn't seem to be the way it is used here.--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 22:25, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is the rate caluculated? 
Talk:C. J. Laing

message: Even if you get C.J. Laing's real name from a WP:RS, please don't post it. This has caused trouble before. WP:BLP privacy applies here. • Gene93k 18:34, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Posting of personal info

message: I'm not convinced the Wikicommons image is accurate, it doesn't match other images of the actress I've had pointed at me (see my edit summary), and someone claiming to be the subject has contacted me disputing that that is the subject.  Given reasonable doubt, I'm removing this per WP:BLP until/unless there's good information that the image is actually of the subject.  --j⚛e deckertalk 01:53, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image removed
Talk:Max Crivello

message: you I pray an aid in order to compile this part of author max crivello grat artist sicilian and Italian
thanks 
patrizia
This article appears to be a poor machine translation of an earlier version of the Italian article. Much of it is word salad and will require serious attention. I have cleaned up the first paragraph, mostly, and divided the text into paragraphs. It also needs links added (I added one to Giornale di Sicilia). Rilkas (talk) 22:52, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Laportea

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Laportea interrupta. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 8#Laportea interrupta until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 05:33, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Laportea interrupta" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Template talk:WP nav pages (header bar)

message: 
Based on User:Wknight94 protection, suggest adding  to the top of the template page Tamr007 (talk) 10:02, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Y Done –  13:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of pp-template 

message: We now have a "help index" at Wikipedia:Help index - there are currently no links to help contest from this template. I would say the new index is now a "main resource list and/or directory"  that any user/editor be they novice or at the expert level could benefit from. Bellow the look of the proposal - The order its seen in is not relevant to me..last middle...dont care.Moxy (talk) 05:26, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: -- WOSlinker (talk) 22:16, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding Help index proposal
Talk:List of the most popular names in the 1890s in the United States

message: Is it just me, or is this list POV? -FlubecaTalk 17:11, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: Please go to the discussion at Talk:List of the most popular names in the 1880s in the United States#Please extend the lists to the top 50 given names regarding the extension of the lists of most popular names. Ar Colorado (talk) 20:37, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please extend the lists to the top 50 given names
Template talk:Ford trucks of the United States & Canada 1990 to present

message: The Graziano link goes to Toyota FJ Cruiser. But I don't know how to delete it without the box going messed up. Matthew Edwards 17:13, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

message: What about other types of Ford Trucks? I'm talking about medium and heavy-duty ones like the C-Series, H-Series, L-Series, N-Series, T-Series, etcetera. ----DanTD 12:29, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-Light Duty Ford Trucks 

message: Umm, disregard the link in my last edit comment - I meant http://media.ford.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=32991 . --Vossanova o< 14:03, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2011 Explorer
Talk:Kraków sausage

message: Would this be better off merged into the main kielbasa article, it's never going to be much more than a stub? FlagSteward 00:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think so too. Maikel (talk) 23:56, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that, here in the US, almost all people (with no knowledge of the Polish language) would be surprised to hear that krakowska is a type of kielbasa (as it is thought of in Poland, I understand), as we think of the two as very different things. Kielbasa here is thought of only as the thick sausage (kielbasa wiejska, similar to the familiar Italian sausage, but with different seasonings, in smoked or fresh form) always served cooked, whereas krakowska is a sandwich-size cold cut (luncheon meat) always served cold, most often in a sandwich. If you go to a Polish-style deli or meat store in the US, you better not ask for kielbasa if you want krakowska or kabanosy! You'll be asked in reply, "Fresh or smoked?"--BillFlis (talk) 18:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: In German, ("Krakauer") the stress is on the first syllable, KrAH-cow-urh   or 'kʁaːkaʊɐ , if my IPA skills don't suck too much.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.9.61.134 (talk) 00:44, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation?

message: This brand (popular in the UK) contains beef as well as pork. Is that normal? 86.179.247.69 (talk) 20:17, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morliny Krakowska sausage
Talk:Laurelia sempervirens

message: "growth rings little notorious and homogeneous" - I don't understand what this means. Vernon White . . . Talk  23:37, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notorious?
Talk:Laurelia

message: Question asked at Wikipedia Science Desk:
There are two species of Laurelia, one native to the Andes - Laurelia sempervirens (Chilean Laurel, Peruvian Laurel, Peruvian Nutmeg) and the other found in New Zealand - Laurelia novae-zelandiae (Pukatea) .  
When I saw one of these trees, growing at Enys in Cornwall, UK, yesterday, the Head Gardener said they were examples of "Gondwanan distribution".  I have looked at the Gondwana article, but this is very brief on the topic, which is a REDIRECT to Godwana.
I would like to know more about the differences between the two species and when, approximately, they diverged, due to the separation of New Zealand and South America from the Gondwanan continent.  Vernon White . . . Talk  19:24, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I shall leave the differences to the botanists.  As for the divergence, as I understand it, dating the Gondwanan distribution is not easy. For example, in a discussion on ferns, Te Ara Encyclopediaof NZ  suggests that some distribution was windborne.  this Te Ara page also discusses the time span, ocean distribution and later isolation.  Googling Pukatea + Gondwanan yields 39 results which might bear investigation. Gwinva (talk) 05:17, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gondwanan distribution and ''Laurelia''
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 26, 2007

message: 
Please remove the link to the recently featured article Plug-in hybrid, and put a dash between the links William Goebel and Sheerness. Also, please replace the link more... with more... to avoid the redirect. Thanks! Korg (talk) 17:25, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed by Raul654. --- RockMFR 19:16, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 27, 2007

message: 
Please remove the link to the recently featured article Jake Gyllenhaal, and put a dash between the links William Goebel and Sheerness. Also, please replace the link more... with more.... Thanks! Korg (talk) 17:25, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed by Raul654. --- RockMFR 19:17, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Sooner Athletic Conference navbox

message: I changed Rogers State University Hillcats to just Rogers State University. No other school is listed AS a mascot, but as a school. It makes more sense for uniformity. Aepoutre 17:26, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense to me. -steventity 18:00, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: August 2007

message: I have added colors -- they are not "arbitrarity decorative" but are the colors used at http://www.soonerathletic.org/. --King of the Arverni (talk) 19:42, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colors
Talk:Radio Disney's Pop Dreamers (album)

message: This album is covered by the Houston Public Library which gave it five out five stars. I tried to add it but don't have the knowledge of adding it to an infobox. However, if another editor does "rescue" this by adding the second review, I will add that info to my bag of tricks. Could be a virtual chocolate chip cookie in your future too.--Morenooso (talk) 22:18, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Barnes&Noble reference's rating also gave this a five out of five rating. --Morenooso (talk) 22:34, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Can the ISBN number be added too? I should learn that trick for book articles too. --Morenooso (talk) 22:56, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither of those sites provide a rating at all. They are blank as they have received no reviews. Even if they did, those are for user ratings not professional reviews.  The "editorial review" on Barnes & Noble reads more like a press release than an actual review. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 22:58, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rescue tag added 2010-04-22
Talk:San Francisco 49ers Gold Rush

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 22:10, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: San Francisco Gold Rush →  – This cheerleading squad is known as the "49ers Gold Rush" on its official channels  ; the current title is definitely ambiguous, see California Gold Rush. 162 etc. (talk) 17:31, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject San Francisco 49ers has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 21:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 February 2022
Talk:Alaska Route 2

message: Every time the road is extended even one mile all the mile markers will be wrong. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 21:12, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why not number it from the end that can't change? 
Talk:Sanctuary movement

message: I don't understand the vandalism.  Since when is this a contentious subject?  Weird.
Anyway, I just removed the apparent vandalism of someone having added the parenthetical "(like a Molotov cocktail, it blew up the cheese,)" in the very first sentence; and I'm now watching the page. 
Anyone have any idea why stuff like that's happening in this article? Gregg L. DesElms (Username: Deselms) (talk) 22:31, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism... why? Because it's a contentious subject or something? 

message: How about going beyond just rewriting the movement's press releases and considering both sides of the question?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.162.253.101 (talk) 21:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Review by Less Biased Editor 

message: Notability requires that an article present a coherent, encyclopedia topic, and sources that demonstrate that the topic is notable.   Such sources  may well exist for this topic (I rather suspect that they do,) but the article as it stands is to badly written and inadequately sourced that notability is not at all clear.  An editor wanting to remove the tag(s) needs to source the article and do a sourced, NPOV rewrite.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:USOPC Coach of the Year

message: Well, that was fast. I've been notified (by a bot) that this article may be a copyright violation of this page, which is the USOC's page on this award and the source for this article. I disagree. The content describing what the awards are and how they are selected has been rewritten, not copied. I cheerfully admit that the actual list of award winners was copied from the site, but, it's a list. There isn't any way to rewrite that sort of information. I'm removing the copyvio tag. - Eron Talk 17:40, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright
Talk:The American people

message: I removed the sentence about the term being an overbroad generalization because it is not. People with diverse ethnic backgrounds being members of a single nation is not a generalization. It's just a fact. Skeeter08865 (talk) 22:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Generalization? No.

message: I removed the population numbers from this page as there already exists an article on the Demography of the United States.  This page, if it remains, will cover the phrase and its use, not the actual people of the United States. -Acjelen 18:41, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The phrase and its use pertain the U.S. population. It is certainly relevant to mention how many people the phrase applies to. Signaturebrendel 21:14, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Demography of the United States page
Talk:List of mayors of Minneapolis

message: The St. Anthony list isn't incomplete...it just merged with Minneapolis. BobAmnertiopsisChitChat Me! 19:51, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I fixed the party for Tom Latimer.  He was Farmer-Labor, not DFL.  DFL party wasn't formed until 1944, years after he died. T-bonham (talk) 09:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite right, thanks for the catch.--Bigtimepeace | talk |  contribs 09:49, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: fixed Latimer