lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Episodes of Camp Lazlo, Season 2

message: There is no need to wikify the individual episodes of Camp Lazlo on this page. In fact, it defeats the purpose of collecting episodes onto a single page in the first place. Though if you so desire, please feel free to take whatever information is contained in the individual episode pages and put them with their respective episodes on this page, instead. --Dwhyer 03:29, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individual Episode Pages 

message: The page's title should be changed to "Episodes of Camp Lazlo, Seasons 2 and 3", or move all the episodes to one page (merging this with "Episodes of Camp Lazlo, Season 1").  Either that or split this article into two articles.
Noone 16:00, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Title Change 

message: Should this and Episodes of Camp Lazlo, Season 1 be reformatted to be more like List of Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends episodes. Then the trivia (most of them are notes) from the main article can go in the episodes. Squirepants101 01:38, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reformat Again?
Talk:Hill tribe (Thailand)

message: Please use this space for discussion...
As far as my changes are concerned:
1) Some tribes most definitely HAVE leaders.
2) Opium production in Thailand has been eradicated for all intents and purposes.
3) The tribes are completely different from one another... many tribes don't smoke at all.  Each tribe has distinct tribal clothing, although many wear t-shirts and other westernized apparel.
It's incorrect to make broad generalizations about all hill tribes on the basis of encounters with one or two tribes.  There are many variations between different tribes and villages.
Could someone clarify what is meant by "Hmong men have a similar character to Russians"?Philippachaucer (talk) 03:39, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hill tribe. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Paul_012 (talk) 06:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hill tribe listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Alan Dershowitz/Archive 1

message: I regard JillandJack's category change to be inappropriate. As I stated on the talk page for the Lynne Stewart article, JillandJack is apparently a user whose previous account was banned. This user is apparently moving to have the "Radical lawyers" category removed. Rather than letting the category status depend on that outcome, the user has chosen to empty out several articles in violation of the request on the deletion proposal flag.
:I disagree. Whether or not Jillandjack is a good or a bad wikipedian, Dershowitz is not a "radical" lawyer. He holds one of the, if not THE, top law chair in the world. He is not radical in his views of law; that is the mark of a radical lawyer. Argue as much as you like about whether or not his views on Israel are "radical", but he is NOT a radical lawyer.
- batmanand
::He is not a radical lawyer. Chamaeleon 09:59, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  JillandJack's changes should be reverted 

message: His 2nd amendment quote can often be found on the Internet but without even a source attribution.  I tracked down and verified the quote.  The section was more than just a quote; it provided info the Internet needs.  Lotsofissues 10:14, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: I restored the quote

message: "despite evidence pointing overwhelmingly towards guilt" - this is conjecture, and hardly NPOV. I myself watched much of the trial and don't feel that way. And an article on Dershowitz isn't the place for such a statement. DaveWF 07:17, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: OJ Simpson

message: Table AI.1 of Finkelstein's Beyond Chutzpah (pp. 232-242) documents 20 unattributed citations. Please stop altering this number. Sir Paul 02:51, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there anyone with bare credibility that challenges Finkelstein's numbers?  Lotsofissues 06:47, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism
Talk:Karen R. Hitchcock

message: I've decided to add the section on her corruption scandal while at SUNY Albany.
And I've decided to remove the entire "Full Biography" section because it was copied without permission from http://www.queensu.ca/principal/biofull.html. FreplySpang (talk) 23:55, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: removed again. -- Whpq 15:56, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This topic had been in the article earlier, but was deleted for some reason. It is exceptionally relevant, so I have put it back in. We will have to watch for future sanitization attempts on this point; I am sure they will be made, and very soon!!
FrankEldonDixon, May 22, 2008, 5:17 p.m., FrankEldonDixon (talk) 21:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reinserted mention of her application for reappointment at Queen's, three months before resignation
Talk:Atomic (magazine)

message: Ok, I'm happy to help out here. --smadge1 (talk) 13:08, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help out 
Talk:Hocico

message: I'll put this in the discussion as it might not be kosher in the actual article - though those looking up the group probably won't be offended! In an interview with IndustrialnatioN magazine Erk said they chose the name Hocico because of its use in phrases like "callate el pinche Hocico" (shut your f'n mouth) and "te voy a romper el Hocico" (I'll kick your ass) to basically convey the band's sound. The literal translation is already in the article, but I thought elaborating might help a little. In any case don't ask me Spanish questions! - Just writing what I read (IN Issue 17) Khiradtalk 04:12, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not censored for the protection of minors. People who would be offended by that should better not look at the discography, as well, especially the cute "Live in Israel". Trying to sanitize Hocico is unnecessary, and would be disinformative. I have added "callate"; the other probably (no hablo español!) literally translates as "i am going to stomp you in the face"; I think putting that in the article as "kicking ass" would be too confusing for English readers. Thanks! squell 04:05, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hocico&diff=136742803&oldid=136742797
Someone corrected the translation -- 'shut your fucking snout' is accurate. 'Shut your damned mouth' is not.
I'd fix it back again except.... I don't want to have a pinche revert war with a pinsche bot that arbitrarily decides somehting is vandalism.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.87.20.98 (talk) 06:15, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  pinche bot... 

message: Anyone want to help start making pages for the discography? JanderVK (talk) 04:32, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography pages
Talk:List of battles 1801–1900

message: Some of these seem oddly named...Battle of Great Britain? Isn't this just a couple of ships? What does Great Britain have to do with it? Adam Bishop 04:12, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have never heard the name "Battle of Great Britain". I have always heard the air campaign called the Battle of Britain. Anyway it doesn't belong on this page, it was in 1940-41. Maproom (talk) 19:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the Anglo-Sikh wars, there are two battles listed with very similar names.  Chilianwala has a specific date, and some more specific information in its list description.  Chillanwalla is in the same year, and has less information.  I am wondering if these two might, in fact, be the same battle. Roy Al Blue 02:29, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chilianwala and Chillanwalla 

message: All of the battles listed for 1876-1900 have at least a stub for a page. Roy Al Blue 01:57, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fourth Quarter of 19th Century Clear! 

message: Nearly all the battles say Indians.  wouldn't it be more accurate to say "Native American"?--Vercalos 03:31, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indians vs Native Americans 

message: One of the battles of 1857 'War of Independence' or rebellion refers to it as Indian Mutiny. Please remove the same.
:Wikipedia calls this the "Indian rebellion". I have changed this article accordingly. Maproom (talk) 15:09, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage of the term: Indian Mutiny
Talk:Errol, New Hampshire

message: The History section states that Route 16 was requested in 1789 but granted in 1781. This requires verification and wanted to raise it as a topic in case anybody else is able to look into it before I am. 2600:4040:512E:D400:D432:8C74:5DAA:8E8F (talk) 19:30, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section requires updating
Talk:Farmington, New Hampshire

message: Please see the WikiProject New Hampshire talk page for background on the proposed merge of the Farmington CDP article with this article.--Ken Gallager (talk) 13:49, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 
File talk:Flag of Ontario.svg

message: This is very odd.  As I explained to DNewton, there is no reason to delete this image, merely to retag it.  I uploaded an image I created (which is also the basis for the PNG file in current widespread use).  My intention at tagging this image as I did was to release it to the public domain but to also address any potential government copyright.   I'm not claiming that my version is copyright per se: both might be.  If anything: the prior version violates Wp licensing policy, since any real or perceived Crown copyright (by using jurisdictional flags and symbols, in accordance with their websites) was omitted from its Wp summary.
If there are no objections, I will retag the image.  Nonetheless, I apologise for any confusion.  E Pluribus Anthony 04:21, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Retag image!
Talk:Buz Lukens

message: I went ahead and did some library microfilm research on the case regarding Lukens and a charge of delinquency of a minor. I'm hoping a good wikiwriter comes along and cleans up my changes (and does a better job at attributing my sources.) 
There is potential for a separate article on Rosie Coffman and Anna Coffman (the accuser and her mother.) Both had significant criminal records after the Lukens case,  including a situation in which Anna called the police and had Rosie arrested for criminal endangering and menacing. I believe this is interesting information for the historical record, and it might go some way to support the contention that Rosie Coffman was not a reliable witness/accuser, and that Lukens was being framed (a claim he made several times.) 
However, I've left this information out of the article, because I fear it might put in too much subjective spin.Jimbobjoe 04:32, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have deleted a derogatory category about this living person.  The girl in question was over the age of consent and the conviction was for a misdemeanor charge of contributing to the delinquency of a minor.  That simply cannot sustain the derogatory category that's been applied.  Lemonsquares, please discuss here and try to acheive consensensus.  Please do not re-add the category.  And, if my suspicion is correct: Hi Tommy/John.  I'll be watching David in DC (talk) 03:02, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Derogatory category for living person 

message: I propose moving this to either Buz Lukens or Donald Lukens (depending on which can be justified under WP:COMMONNAME). Would usually WP:BOLD this myself but given there was a previous (contentious) move – albeit ages ago – I thought it best to offer up here for discussion. In a nutshell, adding a nickname in quotes is pretty non-standard. If the nickname is most common then it should be Buz Lukens. If not, Donald Lukens. Not half way. MIDI (talk) 12:23, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:SILENCE. MIDI (talk) 10:37, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  The Google Ngram favors "Buz" Lukens, with the quotes. Nonstandard on Wikipedia, I suppose. I certainly remember the name Buz more than Donald from the time this guy was at "peak newsworthiness". This move caught my attention because you failed to move the talk page with the article. See User talk:wbm1058#Oops. – wbm1058 (talk) 22:08, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move
Talk:El Palmar, Quetzaltenango

message: Santa Maria is a volcano right next to El Palmar. El Palmar has been destroyed by this volcano many times.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.5.153.94 (talk) 13:20, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Santa Maria 

message: Recently (June 11, 2011) visited the town and  noticed that the new town isn't called El Nuevo Palmar, but rather Nuevo El Palmar. This should be considered for the article for disambiguation purposes Frapoz (talk) 16:43, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Liebig's Extract of Meat Company

message: The article makes no mention of Liebig's ranch, located in Southern Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe), which was 1.2 million acres in extent and possibly the largest single unit cattle ranch in the world. Nor is any mention made of the Liebig's factory located at West Nicholson.
*It was pretty small compared to Anna Creek station - 6 million acres. Lisiate 00:39, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: (Untitled)
Talk:Long underwear

message: I added the Stanfield piece, based on a book of Maritime inventors. Also, wat's up with the freaky Dylan refs in stub edit portion?  Trekphiler 04:47, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 2005 comment

message: Marked the section w/ Pocohontas as dubious.  Is that just vandalism? Zanter (talk) 16:34, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evil Indians - Dubious 

message: I'm not sure about the unreferenced claims about fabric composition in Europe and the US. There may be some truth in the claims for specialist high end products, but thermal underwear sold in UK chainstores and supermarkets is exclusively made from synthetic fabric, mainly polyester. I haven't seen underwear made from wool for over 40 years. --Ef80 (talk) 13:40, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Europe / US differences
Talk:Alfred Fuller

message: I've seen a book on Maritime inventors that puts Fuller's coy in Somerville, MA, 1906, where he moved in 1903. Clarify or correct?  Trekphiler 04:51, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Oxygen tank

message: OK, somebody needs to realize the tanks are used for more than diving... Some more history would be welcome.  Trekphiler 04:58, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  History needed 

message: Also, a listing of types, sizes and capacities would be handy. How much does a medical oxygen A tank hold? D tank? E tank? dafydd 00:01, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of types 

message: The item shown in the photo accompanying the article is a gas cylinder, not a "tank".  A tank is a vessel used for storing liquids such as water and crude oil at ambient pressure, open to the atmosphere, and often having no top on it. — QuicksilverT @ 23:35, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You would think so, wouldn't you? However, common (ab)use over many years of the term "tank" to mean a compressed gas cylinder has led to the situation where we can no longer sensibly insist on the original meaning. FWIW "diving tank" gives about 292,000 Google hits, not one of which fits your definition. Cheers, --RexxS (talk) 01:41, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomenclature 

message: There have been requests for images through feedback. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 09:12, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for images from feedback 

message: I suggest merging "bottled oxygen" into "oxygen tank".
My understanding is that it is difficult to have a complete encyclopedia article about one without mentioning the other,
and the difference between the terms can be covered in a sentence or two in the merged article.
--DavidCary (talk) 02:08, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge and redirect seems appropriate. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 02:20, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge
Talk:Gifts of the Holy Spirit

message: Been there, done that. I know this from personal experience in one of those lines. Because there are a lot of "true believers" around, no one wants to just jump right up and say, "That was just gravity," so everyone gets up a bit slow and pretends to be a little bit shaken, with a bit of a "Wow, that was interesting!" expression. (And, yes, I do believe in the Holy Spirit, etc., and that the gifts are still in operation. But gravity is still gravity.)
RickReinckens 05:02, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the concept of annoiting a line of people is silly, and I have doubts about the whole concept of falling out anyways, but anyhow, what's this tidbit of info doing in this article? It doesn't really seem to do anything for the article and i'm going to delete it.--Adrift* 17:14, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Domino anointing 

message: The bit about the book "Promised Power" should really be moved down into an external link or booknote or something.--Adrift* 17:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article cleanup 

message: I'm currently working on expanding this page, current draft is at User:Paddles/Gifts of the Holy Spirit. Comments/suggestions, offers to review for NPOV etc. welcome at User talk:Paddles/Gifts of the Holy Spirit. --Paddles 15:09, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The redraft isn't needed given the work that has been done by others on the merge and subsequently. Thanks for everyone who offered help anyway. Paddles TC 22:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Working on a redraft 

message: The articles Spiritual gift and Gifts of the Holy Spirit ought to be merged.
* Since Gifts of the Holy Spirit is the longer of the two, I propose that Spiritual gift be merged into it.
* I also propose that the result be placed under the title Spiritual gifts, as this is the most commonly used term.
Colin MacLaurin 10:50, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: As a student of Charismatic/Pentecostal history, it seems this article gives too much credit to Howard Carter with no documentation.  To simply quote Lester Sumrall would seem inadequate.  Is there any reputable Pentecostal/Charismatic historian or theologian who makes the assertion that Carter originated the idea of nine gifts of the Spirit?  I don't know of any.--Will3935 01:17, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Howard Carter
Talk:Death-qualified jury

message: Does anyone have any sources to cite as to the effect of a Witherspooned jury? The article states that this has the effects of excluding women and minorities. Any sources for this? And should a comment be added that a juror must also be able to consider a life sentence. Nolamgm 05:06, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources regarding the effect of a Witherspooned jury

message: From the article:
:A party may attempt to rehabilitate the juror by asking questions about whether they would consider the death penalty. 
Can somebody change rehabilitate to a different word or link it to someplace? Right now, it links to rehabilitation a disambig page. I do not know where it would go, I'm thinking it may go in Rehabilitation penology) but that talks about rehabiliting prisoners. Or maybe this is a definition, so it should be linked to wikitionary.
:The word is correct. That is what it is called. However, I agree the link does not make any sense. Nolamgm 03:53, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rehabilitate
Talk:Multiple

message: Multiple has been a redir to Multiplication for a couple month. It should have simply been turned into a disamb page, but instead was changed to the newly created Multiple (disambiguation)--it's a complete waste of readers' time and Wikipedia resources to pass primary disambiguation thru a redir.
:The only other thing I thot of is there might be an argument that Multiplication deserves the primary disambiguation for "multiple", in which the redir should be reverted and an appropriate dab header added to Multiplication to the new disamb page. However, IMHO that is only better for editors too lazy to check their link targets, and putting the disambig content at multiple better serves the readers, who I hope we all feel should be put first. 24.17.48.241 05:10, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
===Discussion===
multiples are green.Since multiple wasn't even mentioned on the multiplication page I created a page Multiple (mathematics) where it is defined and made the disambiguation page reference it.  Since it is only a stub I don't think it should be the primary page for multiple.  The disambiguation page seems fine to me.
TooMuchMath 22:23, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: multiples are green.Since multiple wasn't even mentioned on the multiplication page I created a page Multiple (mathematics) where it is defined and made the disambiguation page reference it.  Since it is only a stub I don't think it should be the primary page for multiple.  The disambiguation page seems fine to me.
TooMuchMath 22:23, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Moved. WhiteNight T | @ | C 21:31, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Result
Talk:Grupo Financiero Banamex

message: Moved to talk because needs formatting and references, also can't tell when the information was referring to. RJFJR (talk) 16:58, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Statistics
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Birchview Elementary School (Plymouth, Minnesota)

message: why was this deleted when there was no consensus that does not make sense
8 keep
16 delete
3 merge
2 merge/delete
and also did you know some of the deleters were made before it expanded Yuckfoo 05:21, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It was redirected because (from your stats) there were 29 voters, only 8 of whom wanted it to be kept.  That's not even a third of the votes, so consensus was that the voters on the whole didn't want the content. --Idont Havaname 06:42, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the closing admin didn't put a redirect, they did a delete, which they conceded was a mistake, and reversed (so it's now "no consensus"), which is what the original here comment is about.  3 of the 5 merge voters did want the content.  I put the redirect in place, but that's not based on the AFD (and anyone is free to change it).  Technically, according to the rules, the history should be restored, but since there's so little, I'm not too concerned (anybody is free to just write a full article if that's what they wish).  But, let's be clear, there was *no consensus* to remove the content.  --Rob 18:55, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

text:  Sorry, but I make this 8 to keep the article, and 18 to delete it.  That's a vocal minority to keep at best.  Chris talk back 14:56, 10 December 2005 (UTC)