lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Heinz Linge

message: Was Linge a civilian or in the military, the article doe`snt say so
: I read this book, and the answer is: he was in the SS. 93.219.175.21 (talk) 06:27, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It states in the article he was an SS officer who held the rank of Obersturmbannführer (Lieutenant Colonel) by the end of the war. He would have been a member of the LSSAH. Kierzek (talk) 17:43, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article states that Hitler's body was found by the Soviets on May 2, citing Vinogradov as a source.  The BBC in Britain have just released a series of archive interviews, one of which was with Linge broadcast in 1955 when he was released from captivity. I have summarized this information below, which you can use if you wish to amend the article. 
[Summary start]
However, Linge was interviewed by John Ellison for the BBC programme In Town Tonight, broadcast on 29 October 1955, and he stated the Hitler’s body was never found by the Soviets, claiming that it still lay “in a common grave in a park in the Chancellery.”  He supported this statement by saying that during his time in captivity, “the Russians questioned me repeatedly about it”, proof in his mind that the body was never found by them.
[Summary end]
Source:  BBC Television: Archive: BBC iPlayer  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oasis6767 (talk • contribs) 18:03, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: True, that the whole body was never found and recovered. Only a very, very small portion of Hitler's remains (jaw fragments/dental remains) were actually recovered in the end. I have tweaked the section. Kierzek (talk) 20:23, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed claims about the fate of Hitler's remains 

message: Place of death is Hamburg, not Bremen.
http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-14320425.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.100.102.2 (talk) 15:35, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of Death
Talk:Territorial evolution of the United States

message: The territories of 1776 need to be revisited. Claims at the time to territories populated by Native American groups significantly inland from the coast were tenuous and not definitive. The maps should indicate this. إيان (talk) 08:20, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There are a lot of ways to interpret this request, and I'm not saying this is the best or only way. But this has reminded me that it would be a good idea to at the very least, include the treaties the US signed with the native nations - it wouldn't count necessarily as a border change, since the US has never considered the native nations as independent and this map is, for better or for worse but mainly for a single objective point of view, purely about that. But, like how I include several "unofficial" changes that were nonetheless very important (like State of Franklin, Jefferson Territory, Kearney's New Mexico, etc.), then I should include the treaties.  I'll start work on that tonight, I've been looking for a new map project. --Golbez (talk) 03:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This could be very interesting, so long as you don't overdo it. Focus on the most important examples and indicate that these changes were "unofficial" from the perspective of the United States. Keep up the good work. Columbianmammoth (talk) 03:08, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thirteen Colonies 

message: It can't be removed, so what should it be replaced with? The majority of entries in that block are of the US recognizing other sovereigns for land they've claimed for decades, so "decolonization" seemed most relevant. --Golbez (talk) 16:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: "Decolonization" (and "imperialism") could be politically controversial words in the context of the United States, if that's what you're asking. It could also inspire confusion with the American Revolution period. So avoiding it would be ideal. But, like you said, it's hard to think of a better word that suits the context of this article.  Columbianmammoth (talk) 03:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Decolonization" header
Talk:WRFB

message: Is there anyone in Puerto Rico who can confirm changes in WRFB's subchannel lineup? If Telemundo is on 5.1, why is it on two channels in San Juan (WRFB and WKAQ)? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 22:09, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: You should narrow your question to those living in or near San Juan, Puerto Rico (not all of Puerto Rico), because I live way too far from there and thus I am unable to personally tune to WRFB (I can tune WORA-TV just fine) to confirm whether subchannels changed. But I would personally see very suspect the idea of one same network being aired on two different (high-power) stations within a same small geographical area (and serving the same cities). And the RabbitEars website is not helpful here either - for WIPM-TV, for example, it gives outdated information that I would rather dismiss. Also, confirming something by just tuning to a certain channel might be perceived by other Wikipedians as original research under Wikipedia rules and policies (see this and that), so what do we do about it? ​‑‑🌀⁠SilSinnAL982100⁠💬 05:38, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Channel changes?
Talk:Certified Fraud Examiner

message: So isn't this just all a fraud itself, the association a made up institution to give some semi-fishy businesses credibility? I came to this article because I found the "CFE" term on this site http://ismycellphonebugged.com/Author.html - a site that seems to target private individuals who run around with a tin foil hat and not so much the businesses mentioned to give the book some more credibility. The author of that book carries a whole lot of similar "certificates" noone ever heard of and I wouldn't be surprised if the same people helps one to all of them.--80.171.136.100 (talk) 22:06, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A CFE is very much a bona fide professional designation with a corresponding association (see their web site).  They have been around for decades and have monthly journals and various chapters.  Most external and internal auditors are familiar with the designation.  In what way are you trying to improve the article rather than discuss the subject with your question? 72Dino (talk) 22:28, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this real?
Talk:Doctor X (film)

message: The 2-strip technicolor release was just shown on TCM.   It was a very clean presentation and the sound was also restored.
Atwngirl (talk) 14:58, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: TCM
Talk:Effa Manley

message: "Born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania as the child of an illegitimate relationship, she was often mistaken for being a light-skinned black woman due to being raised in a home with a black father."
Was the wife of her black father her biological mother or was she just adopted by a mixed race family?
If we assume she stayed with her biological mother then can we rephrase:
"Would it be accurate to rephrase this as raised by her white mother and black stepfather, she was often thought to be a light skinned black woman." --Gbleem 21:45, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What are the rules on talking about people's sex life in an article. Do we only do this for women? --Gbleem 06:15, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The rules are to use reliable sources. If someone's sex life has not been written about in a book, newspaper or magazine, it is probably not notable enough for mention. If it has, make sure that you cite who is talking about it and why. This is an absolute requirement when writing about living persons, but is still a good guideline to follow for anyone else. --Dhartung | Talk 08:12, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the source for info on Ms. Manley's sex life?  There's none listed.  I would have to think that a information this sensitive would need to cite a very reliable source.Konczewski 16:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexual 

message: I can't figure out how to edit the local description, but it reads "Baseball player." Effa Manley was not a baseball player; it should read "baseball executives." Tomemos (talk) 04:18, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect local description: "baseball player"
Talk:Karim Pakradouni

message: I can't find any information about his conversion. According to  he is still an Armenian Orthodox. [User:Nicklaarakkers] Saturday 29 July 2006
:Changed to Armenian Orthodox. He never converted to Maronite Church although his mother was a Maronite. Pakradouni even unsuccessfully presented his candidacy for the seat assigned to the Armenian Orthodox community. All religious affiliations are now maintained as Armenian Orthodox in his page. Thanks for pointing it out though. werldwayd (talk) 03:08, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Info
Talk:WXOU

message: :In actuality, WXOU really sucks.  Classical music and the occasional jazz notwithstanding, WXOU has a highly developed talent for consistently playing the most insufferable crap ever recorded, with a consistency and efficiency to rival the United States Army.  Entire graduating classes have reported  devoting as much as 15% of their time to planning station sabotage to stop the horrid pseudo-music broadcasts blasting through the Oakland Center.
I put back this critical opinion because, while it may be POV, it is relevant opinion of, at least, the author, and possibly a significant proportion of the student audience. Besides, I like the way it is said, as it seems to describe a lot of student operated radio. Simply removing the paragraph makes the article poorer. I think leaving it makes the article better. The article could be made better still if the other side was also presented, by someone who likes listening to the station, at least some of the time. Because the above paragraph tells me the critic who wrote this does like listening to the station but is in denial about that. I want to understand why. -- Cameron Dewe 21:50, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unbalanced opinion
Talk:Septimal comma

message: The tonalsoft Septimal Comma page has four different possible definitions for a septimal comma. I would have expected it to be a different ratio than the one we have here, according to the description we give, as 4/3 x 4/3 / 7/4 = 64/63. That is the septimal comma which is a difference between 3-limit (4/3^2) and 7-limit (7/4) intervals as the lead describes. The one we have now has a 5 in its prime factorization. Alternatively, 49/48 is a difference between a 7-limit (7/4^2) abd 3-limit (3/1) tuning, but this would be less common and because we are compounding the more difficult 7-limit interval rather than the 3-limit. There are others, apparently, when a 5 limit intervals are admitted. Which should we be using? - Rainwarrior 22:01, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The term could refer to any small interval with a factor of 7 in it, so we should mention all the important ones: 36/35, 49/48, 50/49, 64/63, 126/125, and 225/224 at least. It's pointless to debate which one should be called "the" septimal comma. Anyone who wants to be unambiguous will just use the ratio. —Keenan Pepper 22:30, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm currently rewriting this article to be more general, and cite sources. —Keenan Pepper 22:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this really the definition?

message: I have added an audio example to the article. Hyacinth (talk) 23:11, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested audio
Talk:International Four Days Marches Nijmegen

message: I'd like to see citation on the number of casualties.
213.46.208.149 22:16, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of casualties

message: I do not understand the rename action of this article by User:Ngio.
The action: changing 'International Four DayS MarchES Nijmegen' to 'International Four Day March Nijmegen'.
Pro:
* Four Day March is a compound, so doesn't take number agreement.
Points against:
* Official name at website of Stichting 4DAAGSE is International Four Days Marches Nijmegen.
* Every day the participants will come back to Nijmegen and in this way we can talk about 4 seperate marchES in 4 dayS. Yes indeed you only receive a medal after completing the four days.
Vdegroot 13:50, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear Vincent, sorry about that, I probably did the wrong thing renaming this. If Stichting Vierdaagse calls it International Four Days Marches Nijmegen then that's what we should call it in Wikipedia, even if it isn't proper English. It's hard for us native speakers to get used to the fact that continental Euro-English isn't the same thing as we learnt at our mothers' knees. I don't however think that your argument about the four seperate marches on four days will fly: that would be the Four International Day-Marches (now I'm just being silly!). Anyway, I'll move it back. -- Ngio 18:32, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  'Vierdaagse' isn't Dutch for 'Four day's', since 'Four day's' isn't English - plurals aren't formed with an apostrophe. If anything, it's Dutch for 'Four-day', which is at least is an adjective, like 'Vierdaagse', and could likewise be used as a noun ('he took part in the 90th Four-Day'). And I don't agree that we should simply accept whatever mangled English the Dutch make up without bothering to have it checked by a native speaker - all this does is allow incorrect English to proliferate on Wikipedia. At the very least the article should mention that the title is incorrect. I personally always refer to it as the 'Four-day walking event', since it doesn't even involve marching (which is solely military, whereas most participants are civilian), but walking.188.230.248.85 (talk) 13:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

text:  I changed the translation into "four day march". "Vierdaagse" is a noun, not an adjective (that's "vierdaags"). I kept "march" because I don't think that marching is solely military. Wimvdam (talk) 20:33, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  International Four Days Marches Nijmegen 

message: This article contains contradicting statements about the number of military participants:
"a few thousand military participants" in the first section, "about 5,000 Military" in the section Summary, and "In recent years the military participants have numbered approximately ten thousand." in the section Vierdaagsefeesten. This should be cleaned up and replaced with one or more concrete dates and numbers, it's confusing. I've added the "contradiction" template to the sentences in question. 178.202.42.31 (talk) 09:09, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction: Number of military participants? Largest event in the world?
Talk:Oktober Guard

message: The Characters section needs extensive rewriting. Some do not adequately distinguish between events from the comics and those from the cartoon. It is unclear what criteria are being used to define "original", as the section even admits that Dragonsky debuted years later. The distinction between "Replacement members" and "New members" is also unclear. The usage of flags to indicate each character's nationality is probably not in compliance with our MOS. Details about preliminary/developmental names are dropped in at random with little regard to how this affects the flow of the text. I suggest adopting a standard format something like the following:
:Codename - Civilian name. Military specialties. Personality description. Activities in the Marvel comics.... In the Sunbow cartoon.... In the DIC cartoon.... In the Devil's Due comics.... In the G.I. Joe Renegades cartoon... In the IDW comics... Developmental notes....
--Khajidha (talk) 21:45, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the flags and rephrased some of the worst of the prose. I'm not familiar enough with the source material to do much more.--Khajidha (talk) 22:19, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Member write-ups
Talk:Nicholas of Japan

message: did he become a citizen of Japan?  Thanks Hmains 22:26, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: An editor with no edits listed in their background has changed all examples of "Nicholas" to Nikolai.  Should this be allowed to stand?  Or should we revert these? Pete unseth (talk) 22:57, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Nicholas" or "Nikolai"?
Talk:Quaker Mill Company

message: not an Ohio company 2hamburgers (talk) 07:15, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: i have waited and waited on the yogurt bars to be back only the shekf.Finally I saw them last night at a Food Luon Grocery store I was so excited.Got home tasted the strawberry yogurt bar,and I was so disappointed. There was absolutely no strawberry flavor at all,not even a hint
Plz fix this issue.,i love the blueberry more its my fav,but you need to taste the strawberry one.its a big disappointment. Thanks.CThomas 66.153.198.156 (talk) 13:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strawberry yogurt bars
Talk:Great Western Railway of Colorado

message: The December 1970(!) timetable says there was "Mixed Train Service" operated on the mainline between Longmont and Eaton and to Loveland, whereas the Welty and Milliken Branches were operated for "Intermittent Freight Service" only. The article says passenger operation was given up in 1926, but obviously was continued in the form of mixed trains after that time. --Thogo 15:07, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passenger service
Talk:CC (cat)

message: Copy-Cat had kittens in December of 2006. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.108.23.251 (talk) 22:00, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006 kittens 

message: The page was vandalized across 2 streaks of edits, in Oct & Nov 2018 (e.g. keyboard mashing, inserted nonsense words, "Plus, she's cute." (Not that I disagree. :) ). AFAICT, all other edits after [] were laudable but impromptu, incomplete clean-up attempts. So I just published the mentioned version again (as prescribed in WP:CUV except for longer summary; only found it afterwards).
Looking through the two offending IPs' contribution pages around Nov 2018, it seems like no further WP:AIV notice (2 week block still in place or expired) or cleanup on other articles is left to be done. Yay! Toxide (talk) 22:42, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Dual-sport motorcycle

message: Isn't there a difference in the motors of a Street bike and an off road bike?
Isn't one a 2-stoke and the other a 4-stroke?
Isn't that why dirt bikes sound like a chainsaw? --BillyTFried 22:40, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2-strokes versus 4-strokes

message: I am generally opposed to the merge. Enduros and dual sports are usually the same thing, license plates and headlights being the main difference, but their use is completely different. Just link the two pages.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rlboyce (talk • contribs) 14:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I'd have thought 'dual purpose' was way more common.--Cancun771 (talk) 14:19, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Seven years later! Does anyone actually use the term "dual sport"? I've almost never heard it! In the category of dirt-capable bikes we have true dirt bikes (motocross, endure and trials) and on/off-road bikes, such as trail bikes and adventure bikes (which are basically big trailies).  "Dual sport" suggests a bike that can be used for two sports; since that is not the case, "dual purpose" or "all-road' makes more sense.  But does anyone use those terms?  I reckon this page need a new title (as well as a proper sort-out). Arrivisto (talk) 16:17, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Dual sport really more common?

message: I'm not too familiar with wikipedia policy and guidelines, but I hope the information below might help the authors :
An interesting distinction between dual sports is the material used for fairing. Road-oriented bikes use painted, ABS-like plastics like on road bikes. Offroad oriented bikes use the softer polyethylene, which looks cheaper, is not suitable for painting (stickers are used), but is far more resistant to abuse. Experienced offroad riders immediately spot the difference, but there's no mention of this distinction on this page or the more general motorcycle pages.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.101.61.230 (talk) 18:37, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  A few comments, possible additions (not too familiar with wikipedia policies, sorry) 

message: >The heaviest dual-sport offered by Suzuki Motor Corporation in 2008 weighs about 460 pounds (210 kg) and has a large two-cylinder engine with plenty of power for long freeway trips.
what bike would that be?
v-strom is not dual-purpose, it's tourer.
only yamaha (super tenere) and honda (africa twin and VFR1200X Crosstourer) are making heavy duals atm. (they call them "adventure tourers"89.17.13.164 (talk) 00:31, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not 2008. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 01:28, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  suzuki dual-sport with 2 cyl?
Talk:World Union of Jewish Students

message: The article confuses WUJS (World Union of Jewish Students) which the introduction discusses with the WUJS Institute which has been a separate institute for a  number of years.  I will continue to edit this page as WUJS and suggest that a new page be created for the WUJS Institute.    —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.118.11.120 (talk) 14:11, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: WUJS Institute/WUJS Aad

message: I seriously question these ever expanding lists of chairpersons and awardees. I suspect they are only of interest to those named. If they are significant, shouldn't they be on the website of the organisation? Wikipedia is an enclyclopaedia, not a directory, and I don't think many or any other organisations maintain such lists on Wikipedia. Wikipedia has a policy on this: 'A person is typically included in a list of people only if all the following requirements are met: The person meets the Wikipedia notability requirement. The person's membership in the list's group is established by reliable sources.' WP:LISTPEOPLE These requirements are not met in this case. I propose that these lists are deleted. Jontel (talk) 15:51, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: good point, i came to the talk page for the same thing. i will be removing them. skarz (talk) 14:38, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ever expanding lists
Talk:Manghud

message: It coincides completely with the information given under the article History of Tajikistan--Mika 22:47, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I have added a source as requersted. 

message: They took the Islamic title of Emir instead of the title of Khan, since they were not descendants of Genghis Khan and rather based their legitimacy to rule on Islam.
Well this is clearly not true and seems to be inserted POV. "Khan" is just a title meaning chief and is used by many Non-Chinggised and Non-Mongol people in Afghanistan, Iran and the Indian-Subcontinent. I believe this should be removed. Akmal94 (talk) 02:18, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Khan
Talk:Oh, Arkansas

message: I am stripping out the lyrics in favor of a link to the lyrics on the Arkansas Secretary of State's website, both for copyright reasons and for consistency with Arkansas' other three state songs.  "Arkansas (You Run Deep In Me)" doesn't have an article yet (perhaps because Wikipedians keep confusing it with the older song "Arkansas", now the state anthem), so I put the lyrics link in the article of its writer Wayland Holyfield instead; I also added links to the existing articles on "Arkansas" and "The Arkansas Traveler" (state historical song).  70.232.94.206 22:55, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:SARS Wars

message: Why the hell does this exist? Jerry Steinfield (talk) 22:44, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  ? 

message: The Trivia section currently says: "In the movie, the type 4 strain of the SARS virus is called Sarsi, referencing..."
Does anyone know what they might have been starting to say there?  Kirby777 (talk) 01:42, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The original addition, added by an IP editor, said, "In the movie, the type 4 strain of the SARS virus is called Sarsi, referencing a brand of soft drink that was sold in Thailand decades ago." The latter half was removed by another IP editor. I've removed the entire section now as it's nonsense. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:14, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia