lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Oscar Micheaux

message: I don't know anything about this man's later life! I saw "Within Our Gates" and thought it was great. Can ANYONE add some info about how he fared after the talkie era? Jfulbright (talk) 14:23, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I just saw "Veiled Aristocrats" on TCM, so it's not lost anymore.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.50.12.158 (talk) 04:24, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The audio pronunciation given is [mi-SHAW] when it should be [mi-SHOH]. The written IPA pronunciation reflects the latter, correct pronunciation. 67.83.99.134 (talk) 15:49, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation audio is incorrect
Talk:Childs v Desormeaux

message: I'm getting really sick and fucking tired of whatever cheese eating highschool boy is writing in case summaries. This one is not even close to the worst so far, but look can we just get some sort of 'agreement' from you wikipedia morons to at least attempt to use the case summaries available from quicklaw etc to guide your entries?
I'm seriously going to just start erasing case summaries. If some memo-mad 1st year with half a brain used some of the case summaries I've fixed in the last year from time to time they'd be drummed out of law school as clinically retarded.
:I'm sorry you feel that way. I don't think many of the summaries were written with the intention of being correct or complete right off the bat. I suspect you may have the wrong expectations for what you are reading. As with virtually everything else on wikipedia, material it is all a work in progress. The errors and gaps are should motivate people to correct them. It is unfortunate that it has had the opposite effect with you. I completely agree that some of the articles are very poor, but I don't see the need to be paternalistic to the student who wants rely on materials that is noticably incomplete and unclear. On each page there is a link to the actual case so I don't think it unreasonable or onerous to expect a reader to verify what they read by checking the actual decision. If they want to rely on potentially incorrect information without doing any further due diligence then that is entirely up to them. While I understand you may be frustrated, I don't see any reason not to try to improve what is already there rather than reject the whole thing outright. Perhaps if you were to elaborate on what you see as wrong in each article, I'm certain we can work on getting it right. --PullUpYourSocks 16:27, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Janet Jackson (album)

message: This article is very weak. I've been cleaning it up. The prose was weak, and it followed almost word for word its main source. I've improved that. The article had been padded out with trivia, and material which didn't belong in this article.  But I'm concerned that there is now very little useful information here. SilkTork (talk) 10:40, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: We have the statement "Janet Jackson is described as a post-disco and R&B record" in the lead and in the info box, but not explained in the main body. We have "It received little notoriety on the principal singles chart" - I am unsure what is intended. Overall, there is little actual information. Compare with Janet Jackson's Rhythm Nation 1814, a GA article, and  Dream Street (Janet Jackson album), a start class article. This article is closer to the start class article in terms of amount of information. SilkTork (talk) 01:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article assessment
Talk:Masbate Island

message: I removed a majority of the information from the article (see below) which was inserted by an 203.177.167.135 February 25 2006; it is a copyright violation from http://www.wowphilippines.com.ph/explore_phil/place_details.asp?content=history&province=30 and should not be reinserted.  —  THOR  |    20:47, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{tl|copyvio}}
Talk:Francis Asbury Roe

message: He has the first name as Francis Scott Key. --User:General Eisenhower--
:So do a lot of people: "Francis" is a fairly common given name. If you're going to make a point, don't leave half of it out.  — AnnaKucsma   (Talk to me!) 21:09, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sound
Talk:Asian Currency Unit

message: I note the references linking the proposal to the East Asia Summit have been removed yet it is still linked on occassion with the broader 16 nation grouping see: .  I have not added this to the article as this may be speculation by an India-based commentator who would have reason to promote the broader grouping (because India is in the East Asia Summit but not ASEAN Plus Three).  Are others able to identify more current discussion? - Eas21c (talk) 04:04, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  East Asia Summit 

message: Template: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 02:48, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of [[:Template:{{ucfirst:Asian Currency Unit}}]]
Talk:Adriana Molinari

message: Not that it really matters, but she certainly competed at Miss USA 1991.  IMDB says she was both NH USA 91 & 92 which cannot be true... so perhaps she won the Miss New Hampshire-America title?  Anyway without a decent source I have removed the info (ditto about her being Miss Argentina) -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 02:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The subject here apparently won a bunch of pageants - including the Miss NH USA 1991 pageant, and she did compete (and apparently did not place) at the Miss USA 1991 pageant. Multiple sources are now in the article. Guy1890 (talk) 07:20, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Pageants
Talk:Lezley Zen

message: How can you be 60% Native American and 40% caucasian? You can't be 3/5ths Native American, because geneological lines  go 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, etc, not in increments of five. I'm removing her from the Native American categories. Asarelah 17:52, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kabul Expedition (1842)

message: Everything I had read, including this article states that the Afghans retreated, the British entered Kabul, destroyed what they could and retreated back to India, there was never a "battle", much less in Kabul itself. All the whole British presence in Kabul got summarized in two line anyway. If no one disagrees I will change the article to "Kabul expedition (1842)" or something similar. Any ideas? Bertdrunk (talk) 18:22, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It is confusing to the reader. I have now made changes to the article as in fact there were a number of battles right from the start of the expedition. From that more detailed individual articles on those battles can be added at some point. Eastfarthingan (talk) 10:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Really a Battle?

message: That image has nothing to do with 1842. Check this: , first image on the left page. By early days of the occupation its referring to in its first in August 1839. @HLGallon Noorullah (talk) 12:11, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @HLGallon Looked online for some more resources and they seem to point out 1842, fine to keep it then. Noorullah (talk) 00:51, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing to do with 1842
Talk:Heather Hunter

message: I took out the names of all the friends, old boyfriends, and people she met on the street. This has no place in an encyclopedia entry. I'd like to see more about her post-porn career added... --K72ndst 18:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Her relationship with celebrity Bill Maher was certainly worth a detailed mention in his Wikipedia entry and seems like relevant biographical information here. Dick Kimball (talk) 19:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's unsourced in his WP biography, and it will be deleted from here if it's added without a reliable source. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 19:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

text:  It's rather hard to see how it would be inherently all that notable even if it were well-cited.  Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a gossip mill.  Xihr  10:40, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: Is her appearance on The Bobby Heenan Show (where she promoted Coming On America, danced and flashed Heenan) worthy of a mention? --76.251.215.213 (talk) 19:43, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearance on The Bobby Heenan Show 

message: Re:  
 is a non-diffusing subcat of , but not all subcats of  are non-diffusing. In particular, for example, Heather Hunter is a member of , which is diffusing subcat of , which is a diffusing subcat of , which is a diffusing subcat of .  is explicitly marked as , i.e. articles should not be in it directly. Mitch Ames (talk) 03:47, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the explanation, Mitch Ames. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:01, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category: American artists
Talk:Domonique Simone

message: You can see in her face she has european ancestry also. She should be called bi-racial, not african-american.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.53.159.220 (talk) 09:03, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bullcrap 

message: As African-American is not a nationality, I have changed it to say simply "American actress." Racial designations don't need to appear in the lead outside of very specific situations. 66.24.209.81 (talk) 13:18, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Got rid of racial designation
Talk:Jaimee Foxworth

message: Are you sure she was part of the regular cast of this TV series? It's mentioned neither in the Wikipedia article of this show nor in IMDb... -82.80.23.45 (talk) 13:04, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Part of the regular cast of "Getting By"? 

message: Where are the rest of her film credits? "Crave" had at least 20 films to her name...
There is no such thing as abusing marijuana. Marijuana kills absolutely no one.38.118.23.20 (talk) 08:39, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete film credits? 

message: This article previously claimed she had appeared in pornography under the name 'Crave'. As this is a biography of a living person notable for other things, such a claim is contentious and must be supported by reliable sources. The sources in the article supporting these claims were not reliable, so I removed them; please do not restore these claims without better sourcing. Robofish (talk) 14:29, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Pornography claims
Talk:Bancor

message: Whoo-boy.  Somebody needs to edit this article for spelling errors, but I don't understand the subject matter enough to want to stick my nose into it. Rcarlberg (talk) 20:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

message: Why is this section even in here? It has nothing to do with the bancor as a concept and seems like a literal copy paste from either the Friedman page, the Keynes page or one of the articles dealing with Keynesian or monetarist economics.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.192.6.10 (talk) 14:12, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Half or more of the article has nothing to do with bancor as a concept. 174.46.28.58 (talk) 16:11, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Milton Friedman section 

message: This article has in the past strayed away from describing the subject and into promoting it as an idea. The article should not unilaterally be making a case for bancor. It should not present subjective histories of the Bretton Woods conference. It should not present a long section that promotes only points of view in favor of bancor. 174.46.28.58 (talk) 16:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  neturality needs to be kept in the article 

message: This company named Bancor just raised  in capital.  Found this article; would expect other reliable sources in tomorrow's business press.  Interesting.  http://www.coindesk.com/150-million-tim-draper-backed-bancor-completes-largest-ever-ico/  N2e (talk) 19:48, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bancor is now the name of a company (June 2017)
Talk:Gurdas Maan

message: The infobox states 1951, but the lead paragraph states 1957. Which is it? ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 04:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of birth

message: Jai Ho sir ji Vikaskumarpsp (talk) 09:55, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  super 

message: Sir, Is "native" and "place of birth" same? As per Place of birth: 
 The place of birth is not necessarily the place where the parents of the new baby live. If the baby is born in a hospital in another place, that place is the place of birth. In many countries, this also means that the government requires that the birth of the new baby is registered in the place of birth. 
The article link  says the subject and his mother are natives of Giddarbaha but nothing about place of birth is written. As per above excerpt, the native place of the family might be different than the place of birth of the subject. In that case, equating native to birth place would be an WP:OR isn't it sir? For now I'm putting it in the Personal life section since Infobox musical artist has no place for native. Kindly help. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:28, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Typically speaking "native" implies where a person was born, but I guess it could also mean "home town", so maybe it's best not to make an assumption. You might consider asking at WikiProject Biography to see how other editors might treat it. Or you might get a quicker answer at the Help Desk. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:53, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the suggestion sir. But for now this link put by that IP editor will do. It is in Punjabi but his DoB, place of birth is clearly mentioned. As for the IP, can he be blocked for harassment? I'd issued him a level4 warning on harassment but he still harassed me. See here and here. He talks all sorts of non-sense, ranting about anti-Sikh sentiment, current Prime Minister of India, Indo-Aryans, Hindu vs Sikh and what not only because I said the source is not explicit. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:15, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  It looks like he's already been hit with a block. If the abuse continues after the block expires, let me know and I'll deal with it. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:03, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'll surely do so Sir. This person reported me to the ANI calling me an Anti-Sikh propagandist. I explained clearly what I actually wanted from the references. I lodged a Harassment Complaint of my own against this IP. It got blocked for 2 weeks link. He even badmouthed Utcursch. Sorry for the late reply Sir, suffering from flu. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:08, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Native
Talk:Justin Slayer

message: there was nothing important about this page and there where no real stories about the person like other better of there partners (Questchest (talk) 23:39, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: deletion
Talk:Sean Michaels (actor)

message: Per the biographies on living persons, the birthname has been removed as it was unsourced. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 17:39, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alleged birthname removed 

message: An RfC which may affect this article's title is currently taking place (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pornography#RfC: Should a person who has appeared in exclusively pornographic films be described as "(actor/-tress)" or "(pornographic actor/-tress)"?). Rebecca1990 (talk) 21:02, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  (actor)/(pornographic actor) RfC 
Talk:Jake Steed

message: The information in this article is used as criterion for inclusion in the list at Human penis size#Men famous for their large penis as well as :Category:Men with unusually large penis. Now, more than 50 names have been included, and there have been objections raised strong enough that both the list and the category are currently targeted for deletion. Placing this posting uniformly on the talk pages of the articles concerned, I would firstly encourage editors to make sure reliable sourcing is provided to support the claims regarding penis size. Secondly, editors might wish to involve themselves in the discussions taking place at Talk:Human penis size and Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. __meco 14:05, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem with penis size information
Talk:Tiger Tyson

message: First of all, since when is a nom for speedy deletion considered vandalism?  Second, why did you remove the unreferenced tag without adding any references?  Where are the references?  You don't remove an unreferenced tag without adding any references.  Your sweeping edits without explanation or good reason are themselves vandalism.
Unless you can improve the article, you will leave the speedy delete tag in place and allow an admin to decide whether this article should stand.  And until you can add references you will allow the unreferenced tag to stay.
71.127.234.51 14:18, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I might be inclined to take this a tad bit more seriously, if the person making these value judgments about the merit of this article were posting under an actual user name, instead of a random I.P. address.  Tiger Tyson is a well known porn star, who is recognized in his industry.  For anyone to claim that this article isn’t notable is not only ignorant, but hypocritical, as there are hundreds of other articles on Wikipedia subjected around other porn stars; yet I don’t see you on a crusade to get any of them removed.  Quite frankly, your whole campaign to have this article deleted is insignificant, ridiculous, petty…and yes, it does reek of masked vandalism. - Jtpop 14:48, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ClockStrikes9 improper edits themselves vandalism 

message: Both of these years are mentioned as Tiger's birthyear...which is correct? Hilljayne 21:50, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sourced by IAFD as 1977. GayGuy54 (talk) 00:40, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1977 or 1979? 

message: Yes, a lot of info in this article is unsourced. As with many articles on porn actors, a lot of the material to verify these facts is X-rated, and therefore unsuitable for sourcing purposes on Wikipedia. Most of the unsourced facts in this article, however, are innocuous and not likely to be challenged. Please discuss here if you think an specific unsourced item should be removed. Keep in mind that most of these facts are verifiable by visiting Tyson's official Web sites, linked to in this article. GayGuy54 (talk) 16:32, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "X rating" does not stop something being used as a source on Wikipedia.  Questions about the sources reliability, however, do. Just thought I'd point that out. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced
Talk:Emergence (Star Trek: The Next Generation)

message: Curious objection:
Towards the end of the episode, after the created intelligent lifeform leaves the Enterprise, Councillor Troi, Worf and Data are seen celebrating along with the rest of the passengers aboard the "Orient Express" recreated in the Holodeck.  Shortly after the lifeform departs, the Holodeck program ends and all Holodeck created matter dissappear, however Councillor Troi, Worf and Data are still seen holding glasses with beverages, presumably generated by the Holodeck program.
:I think the holodeck is capable of replicating things. Remember that holographic bullets can kill if the safety settings are off.
:... holedeck work on a principle of light and forcefields.  which means sensory inputs of sight, touch, sound. Though I'm curious to taste and smell.  There holodeck often has lingering objects.  
Holographic bullets kill, yes, but not because of the mass or composition but rather because of the disruption to the organic systems.  Shock.  Bloodloss.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.175.184.32 (talk) 00:54, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ... :... As explained in a previous episode (I forget which one), the holodeck works on a combination of illusion and replication. First, the computer subtly alters the setting to make scenes look larger than would seem possible based on the limited size of the holodeck. Second, the computer uses the ship's replicator to create items that the crew interacts with, such as a gun or the glasses of champagne. The glasses the three are holding are as real as if created by the ship's replicator.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.88.133.84 (talk) 02:35, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Similar to the points I have made about the see also section of the Galaxy's Child article on its talk page, the 'See also' section of this article is to my mind equally problematic. While there could be seen to be similarities between developments in this episode and The Offspring (although the circumstances are different), the relevance to some of the other episodes is rather more tenuous - in Galaxies Child for instance a baby space creature imprints on the Enterprise, but is not the ship's offspring nor is it created by a machine. Moreover, the inclusion of B'Elanna Torres on the grounds 'This Star Trek: Voyager tv show character has a pregnant' seems rather random and in some ways inappropriate. It is not as if Torres is the only Star Trek character ever to be pregnant/give birth (for example Major Kira in DS9 had a notable pregnancy) and there is no obvious relevance between Torres' pregnancy and the creation of the new life form in this episode. Also I noted that Emergence was itself in the see also. I have removed this as there is no way the same article should ever be referred to in a see also section. Dunarc (talk) 19:30, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also
Talk:Shaun White

message: The article states "On 2009-01-25, Shaun became the second competitor, after Tanner Hall, to win a gold medal in the Superpipe in consecutive years at the Winter X Games".  But, in the "Achievements, recognition and popular culture" section, it states "He is the first snowboarder to win back-to-back gold medals in the Winter X-Games Superpipe."  Am I missing something, or is this a direct contradiction? JoelWhy 2:59, 6 May 2009
: I thought this ought to be answered as it has sat here for long enough. Yes, you are missing something. Tanner Hall is a skier, the claim is the first snowboarder. Suicidal Rat (talk) 22:06, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory information? 

message: White appeared alongside Ross Powers, Michelle Taggart, JP Walker, and others as a playable character in Cool Boarders 4 for the original PlayStation back in 1999 as a 13 year old, and was even given a unique adolescent-sized figure in the game. Should be mentioned under Media Appearances.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1010:B05B:4B33:40E1:C011:F32:1C21 (talk) 04:38, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request -4 July 18 

message: "Three-pete" — seriously?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.76.3.43 (talk) 14:15, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Achievements 

message: Shaun white is currently dating Nina dobrev of vampire diaries. 68.190.106.220 (talk) 19:10, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --allthefoxes (Talk)  19:21, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 June 2020 

message: The word “Olympic” is misspelled twice as “Olypic” leaving out the letter “m” in the paragraph on “2022 Olympics”. 192.230.189.240 (talk) 21:58, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: - FlightTime (open channel) 22:11, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 February 2022