Talk:Mood ring

message: Completely redid the page, and removed the cleanup tag. It was sort of done in a big sort of wiki-edit rush; I may have made some grammatical/wiki errors. Someone should look into this. Scytheml 03:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why does a mood ring turn your finger green?
What do the colors of a mood ring mean? i agree with him
:If a ring is turning your finger green, that usually means it was made with a cheap metal. You'll often see this with imitation gold rings -- febtalk  01:34, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's Copper carbonate - possibly mixed with Copper(I) chloride.  A cheap mood ring is very likely made of brass (which includes Gilding-metal, Chinese Silver, etc) - this is typical of cheap imitation gold jewellery.  Copper is a major component of all variations of brass - and when left exposed to the air, it gradually forms the carbonate and chloride forms - both of which are blue/green in color and rub off the surface of the ring and onto your finger. SteveBaker (talk) 01:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multi-colored 

message: Im a noob, so.... i read this article 5 mins ago, now its changed
Just thought id re-add the color codes. This is partially because i installed a software gadget cool jewels mood ring, linking the color code to the wiki article. I dont have an account so ill just write my name and date manually. Headphoneguy, 21:22, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That list is a direct copy from , and as such had to be removed as a copyright violation.  Additionally, since those lists are made up by whoever makes the individual rings with little or no scientific basis, I don't believe one can really find a verifiable color list to cite as an acceptable source for this article - there's really nothing factual to verify.  The author of your software would probably be better off either including whatever data they want into the software itself, or linking that How Stuff Works page instead of this article.  Rob T Firefly 21:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-adding the color tags

message: Lists of what the colors "represent" are constantly being added to this article, and being deleted as uncited, unverifiable, or copyright violations.  Please do not re-add a list unless you can provide a citable, encyclopedic source for the info (which as I see it you really can't, since the lists are unscientific and made up by the manufacturers - there is no "real" list.)  Personally, it seems to me that we really can't do more than perhaps linking to offsite lists such as the howstuffworks link already cited, and letting readers go there for the info.  Does anyone have any better ideas for including this info that would suit Wikipedia? Rob T Firefly (talk) 15:37, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One could contact a manufacturer and get an image licensed properly for Wikipedia (or have them add an image to Commons), then use that image in the article as an example of the marketing of the rings.  -- SEWilco (talk) 21:07, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I don't think a reliable source is needed as long as you give the list as an example of the manufacturer's claims, and cite the manufacturer as the source. WP:SELFPUB allows unreliable sources to be used to document claims made by the source about themselves. A manufacturer's statements about their own product are a common example of the application of this policy.--Srleffler (talk) 22:48, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color list 

message: On May 16, 2008, the "mood ring" page was reformatted to include several sub-categories as originally written, before numerous variations (consisting of a range of vandalism to simple mis-information) compromised the data.
The "Shook Book", removed in early revisions, was placed there, not as an advertisement for the book (no longer in print), but as a citation to reference the verification of the inventor and the history of the mood ring DreamBeliever223802:53, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You've introduced a load of uncited gibberish, though. Who says gren is stressed or blue is happy ... apart from being unsourced, it is nonsense on stilts. Your reversion will certainly be reverted for this reason. Please do not engage in a revert war over this but continue to discuss issues on this page. I'm not about to make the reversion now since I'm at work and want time to read through your changes before going off half-cocked. but I serve notice that we have established that there is no reasonable source for a flat-out assertion that this colour means this mantal state. The best we could allow is a cited reference that such and such a ring vendor or ring inventor has compiled this list of colour to mood lookups, whilst noting that there is no scientific basis whatsoever for the assertion being made. 
And it is conventional to add new talk to the bottom of the page and not the top. --Tagishsimon (talk) 12:13, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

text: The deal with color charts is this: The mainstream scientific view is that these gizmo's are thermometers - and they measure some temperature between skin temperature and the ambient air temperature.  Any conceivable changes in temperature due to mood would be at best negligable compared to air temperature fluctuations.  As I have shown, body temperature changes due to time of day and (in the case of women) menstrual cycle are the only possible things you might measure - but those are not exactly mood related and the temperature variations are too small for a crude liquid crystal thermometer to measure in the best of circumstances.  Hence these rings quite simply cannot work as advertised.  Anyone who says they do is a Fringe-theorist (per WP:FRINGE) and must be treated as such.  That means that no color/mood charts are admissible into the article unless they've been discussed in a proper peer-reviewed journal.  We cannot say "mood rings tell you what your mood is" because without properly peer-reviewed sources that say that, we have to take the mainstream view.  The most we can say is that the manufacturers CLAIM that this is true - but that the mainstream view is that this is untrue.  Worse still, we can easily provide sources to show that even within different manufacturers of these contraptions, there is little to no agreement on what colors mean what moods - so even on the (exceedingly remote) chance that the fringe theorists are right - they don't agree on what the color chart should be - so nothing that we would ever be able to put up would be "correct".   However, that's not an issue because mood rings simply don't work - period.  They are (at best) crude thermometers measuring an essentially random mix of body heat and ambient temperature.  This is an encyclopedia - no a sales brochure. SteveBaker (talk) 17:55, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with your main argument. A couple comments, however: the fact that different manufacturers make different claims about the meaning of the colours is not in itself evidence of the falsehood of the claims. Different manufacturers might well design their rings differently, producing a different color as a function of temperature. Also, while it's clear the mood rings measure temperature, it's not inconceivable that there might be some correlation between temperature and mood. Large changes in air temperature will certainly overwhelm this subtle effect, but it's not obvious that there couldn't be a correlation between body temperature changes and mood at any given ambient temperature. I agree entirely, though, that the article shouldn't go there unless there is a reliable source to back it up.--Srleffler (talk) 22:54, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full Revision 

message: User:DreamBeliever2238 has admitted a conflict of interest in this article.  To quote User talk:DreamBeliever2238:
: "Dear Tagishsimon, As my father is the recognized inventor of the Mood Ring, I have posted what I know to be the history of the product as well as any additional information. The reason I requested that others contact me before making extensive changes is because it has been my perception here on Wiki that people just like to see their name in print and make changes to entries without having any substance behind them. After months of such changes, the entry and the information contained therein are essentially worthless. You, or anyone, certainly have every right to make any entries that they would like, but I wonder why one would feel it necessary, unless they are an expert in the field and have personal knowledge of such subjects. Respectfully yours, T.Wernick ~~ DreamBeliever2238 ~~"
WP:COI says: "COI edits are strongly discouraged."
SteveBaker (talk) 13:37, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of Interest on History of Mood Ring 

message: A recent edit (mercifully, swiftly reverted) added the usual nonsense color-interpretation chart - vis:
* violet blue - happy, romantic
* blue - calm, relaxed
* green - average, not much going on with you
* yellow/amber - tense, excited
* brown/gray - nervous, anxious
* black - cold temperature or damaged ring
...of course it was reverted for the usual and well-established reason that no two suggested charts ever seem to be the same and we have no means to know which is 'authoritative' - and also because it's completely unsourced.
But it occurs to me that the whole concept of a 'mood ring' is really rather silly.  Forget the physics explanation - let's accept the assertion that they really do change colour to match your mood according to this chart - and do a thought-experiment:
Suppose you're a guy taking a particularly drop-dead gorgeous babe out on a first date and she invites you home afterwards.  You can quite easily be simultaneously extremely romantic (violet), very, very, excited (yellow) and probably just about as nervous/anxious (grey) as it's possible to be...in fact, if we're being honest, it would be unusual to feel any other way.  So what is the mood ring supposed to show?  We have three simultaneous yet completely different emotions - all being felt at 'off-scale' adrenaline levels - and all clearly identified with different colors in the chart.  What color is the ring in this situation?  Violet with yellow stripes and grey polkadots?
Or...imagine you're driving a really 'hot' sports car on an empty road at 120mph with the wind in your hair - how could you not be simultaneously happy and excited?  So again...violet or yellow?  The situation where you are both happy AND excited happens all the time.  In fact, it's rather difficult to be excited by something that DOESN'T also make you happy.
You can rearrange the color scale (as many ring manufacturers seem to do) to put happiness and excitement on the same color - but then you are sometimes happy and romantic...or romantic and nervous...or relaxed and romantic.  In fact, there are hardly any combinations of emotion that you can't somehow imagine feeling at one time or another.  Hence you can't separate out any of the emotions as different colors if you can ever feel them both at the same time!
The bottom line is that humans are far too complex for emotion to be read on a simple linear scale...it's a multidimensional problem...ergo, these things can't possibly work...whether you believe in the physics or not.
SteveBaker (talk) 04:21, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course a mood ring is silly: It is a gimmick and fun thing more akin to a decoder ring than e.g. an MBTI test. The basis is not entirely unsound, but it remains a toy, and has the limited correctness, differentiation, etc., that a toy does. Easy-bake-owen---not professional kitchen. (Notwithstanding that some young women, new agers, whatnot, may believe otherwise: There are always some complete dupes.)
94.220.246.220 (talk) 19:55, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

text: Let's not compare mood rings to decoder rings and easy bake ovens. The latter two are more practical  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.64.4.153 (talk) 04:47, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A multidimensional problem surely? 

message: ME AND MY SISTERS ALL HAD MOOD RINGS IN THE EARLY 70'S AND WE NEVER PAID MORE THAN $5.00 TO $8.00 FOR THEM.  THEY WERE never $45.00 IN THOSE DAYS.  MAYBE IF HALF OF YOU WERE ALIVE THEN YOU WOULD KNOW NOT TO JUST ARBITRARILY REPEAT WHAT YOU HAVE READ SOMEWHERE ELSE ON THE WEB.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.239.250.100 (talk) 02:36, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is that we need a reliable source or piece of media that can prove it. Hextor26 (talk) 22:20, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Price in the past 

message: Actual experiences. 108.203.149.93 (talk) 00:39, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you provide a reliable source? DonIago (talk) 13:43, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mood rings 

message: Below content was tagged for needing sources long-term. Feel free to reinsert with appropriate references. DonIago (talk) 13:23, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material 

message: Whats the history of mood rings? (for the article)
Inventor?
Company?
~~Ted~~ 2607:FEA8:4A2:4100:AD3B:1C68:D290:AD61 (talk) 04:02, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History?