lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Diabetic sock

message: "Lately" is problematic. It is too transient to use in a wikipedia article. I'm at a loss at the moment for how to re-word this.Astonzia (talk) 15:38, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lately" 

message: As with Mike Rosoft , I agree that the rewrite appeared overly promotional, contradicting or removing previous information, and changing the pov almost completely. Without more references, it's unclear what changes should be made. --Ronz (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted again. Yes, the article could use a rewrite, but nothing should be added that contradicts the one source without a proper source of its own. --Ronz (talk) 16:56, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

text: More of the same editing from the ip. I've tagged all the changes. I'd like others' opinions on how problematic the material is. --Ronz (talk) 17:29, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

text: Thanks. I was looking for an option other than having the ip blocked. --Ronz (talk) 18:11, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've requested the ip be blocked after the most recent edit-warring. --Ronz (talk) 18:17, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: The "See also" section currently contains an entry which reads: Compression stockings, which provide the opposite features
This may be a bit misleading, as some cursory Web searching suggests that there exist compression stockings designed to be safe for diabetics. How could the wording here be improved? --SoledadKabocha (talk) 04:49, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "See also" wording for compression stockings
Talk:Frey's syndrome

message: I'm curious who "Dr Giovanna" is and what qualifications she has.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.73.67.254 (talk) 06:28, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr Giovanna? 

message: How long has the sentence:
"They can appear when the affected person eats, sees, dreams, thinks about or talks about certain kinds of food which produce strong salivation."
...been there without a citation, and if it's been a while, should it not be time to remove it? It's very being there makes casual readers likely to take it seriously whether it has a citation or not.
Kaos-Industries (talk) 03:17, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove dubious sentence?
Talk:Glucagon rescue

message: "Politics of Glucagon Rescue"
Is this really a political issue, per se? Not only does the subsequent text not support this being political, but the tone sounds much like advocacy. I sympathize with the writer; it certainly seems like glucagon administration ought to be taught like other life-saving measures. But perhaps this could be reworded, and possibly additional citations supplied. Druep (talk) 00:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Wikipedia is not a "how-to" guide. I have deleted the following instructions from the article. Axl ¤ [Talk] 14:24, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instructions deleted 
Talk:Monday (The X-Files)

message: I have added a references section with links to IMDB and TV.com, however this page still has lots of text that sounds awfully like "original research" to me. Perhaps someone else can tidy it up. - BlueLightning 13:08, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An interesting article, but nowhere in the plot section does it say that Mulder gets shot, which seems like a strange omission. George Ponderevo (talk) 16:05, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added it in now. That boy gets shot far too often. GRAPPLE X 16:08, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never seen this episode, so I still can't follow the plot. The first paragraph says "The teller sets off the bank's silent alarm and police cars come rushing to the scene. Scully attempts to help her partner, but Bernard pulls back his jacket and reveals that he is wearing a bomb ...". which is fair enough, but helps her partner to do what? Isn't she helping him after he's shot, which is what the picture seems to suggest? George Ponderevo (talk) 16:47, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mulder gets shot? 
Talk:Insulin index

message: Are these two the same thing or are they different? Mixing those two terms is confusing. --B-D (talk) 09:34, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Satiety index vs satiety score 

message: I'm posting to bring to attention the first reference (a book by Gabriel Cousins), which may be there as a means of marketing more than to inform wiki readers. As he is a New-Age religious preacher, and one of many people who have discussed the concept of the insulin index, the reference to him is misleading. It promotes him as an expert in nutrition when he has no nutritional expertise to his name, other than being a raw-food and "conscious eating" advocate. For these reasons, can this reference be removed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.171.164.211 (talk) 08:29, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authority of reference and possible advertisement
Talk:Pacific Northwest Diabetes Research Institute

message: It is now called "Pacific Northwest Diabetes Research Institute" and abbreviated "PNDRI".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Evolume (talk • contribs) 23:20, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change 

message: Clearly the product of promotional editing.  Needs cleanup and sourcing. Jytdog (talk) 17:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: COI
Talk:Polyol pathway

message: Someone made a new article at Sorbitol Pathway that was written pretty disgustingly. First of all, "Sorbitol Pathway" is synonymous with "Polyol pathway," so for the time being I have made it a redirect and have put the information the person put at this page here: User:Andrew Nutter/Sorbitol Pathway. The current state of what was the article (I think it was really only about how it relates to diabetes) is unacceptable to be in a Wikipedia article, so it is just sitting there at my user subpage. I have done a lot of markup to it to make it slightly more coherent, but at this point all that biology terminology is completely lost on me and I can't make it much better than it is. If someone could please edit it to make it coherent, then put it on the Polyol pathway page, it would be greatly appreciated. Again, feel free to edit my subpage User:Andrew Nutter/Sorbitol Pathway.  Andrew Nutter  Talk | Contribs  19:13, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorbitol Pathway
Talk:Random glucose test

message: In my edit, I introduced the term "casual blood glucose" which I ran into in an article earlier today. After a closer look at the article, I checked the method used for sample collection and analysis which was as follows: 
"Irrespective of the time of last meal, capillary blood was obtained by pricking the index finger. Blood was allowed to drop freely on the test strip already inserted on an Accu-Check glucometer without squeezing the pricked finger. The reading was expressed in mmol/l as the casual blood sugar"Odili AN, Abatta EO. Blood pressure indices, life-style factors and anthropometric correlates of casual blood glucose in a rural Nigerian community. Ann Afr Med [serial online] 2015 [cited 2015 Jan 20];14:39-45. Available from: http://www.annalsafrmed.org/text.asp?2015/14/1/39/14873. This is consistent with what is known to be the random blood glucose (RBG) test.
Numerous articles that used the same terminology can be found through a PubMed searchhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=casual+blood+glucose.
I feel confident that this edit is appropriate.BroVic (talk) 15:46, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Steroid diabetes

message: The effects of glucocorticoids on glucose metabolism are very well summarised in this paper: doi:10.1111/j.1365-2362.2008.02067.x JFW | T@lk 12:56, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 

message: — Assignment last updated by BossLady6270 (talk) 22:25, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Digital Citizenship
Talk:2,4 Dienoyl-CoA reductase deficiency

message: Hello.
I am a member of WikiProject Medicine, a Wikipedia wide project that maintains and improves articles that fall under the scope of medicine. Since your article has fallen under our scope, I have placed the correct template(s) on this talk page for verification. Upon reassessment of the article, I'd like to make a few points, as shown below:
*Assess article with class and importance factors
*Added genetics task force
*
Leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! Renaissancee (talk) 16:43, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Reassessment for [[WP:MED|WikiProject Medicine]]
Talk:List of TV Guide editions

message: The earliest SE PA edition I have is a 1973 issue; I've edited the article accordingly. :) Cosmo2006 13:16, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Someone should check, but I believe the Iowa regional edition also contained TV listings for the Davenport-Rock Island-Moline market. Assuming it can be verified, the table for that section should be modified accordingly. [[Briguy52748 (talk) 21:13, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iowa edition 

message: I have taken the liberty of checking past issues of Standard Rates and Data Service's Consumer Magazines and Farm Publications Rates and Data books and checked the information they had concerning TV Guide.  Each of these books listed all the editions TV Guide had at that point in time.  Although I could not go further back than 1959, I'm sure this should clear up some of the magazine's history.149.175.45.121 (talk) 22:08, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consumer Magazines and Farm Publications Rates and Data 

message: Bellczar, I appreciate the addition of the circulation figures but why didn't you include those for New Jersey or Scranton-Wilkes Barre?
Also, shouldn't they have called it the Wyoming-Black Hills edition, instead of Northern Colorado?  I'm pretty sure that Greeley and Fort Collins were served by the Denver edition.70.89.177.161 (talk) 01:44, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circulation (1988) 

message: Someone moved the Northern Colorado edition from Colorado to Wyoming, claiming "despite the title, it primarily served Wyoming."  This is not true.  The population of the Wyoming counties in the edition area is 378,616 (2013 census bureau estimates).  Weld and Larimer counties of Colorado by themselves have more than that.  The population of the parts of states served by this edition is as follows: Colorado, 654,859 (49.3%), Nebraska, 95,234 (7.2%), South Dakota, 198,890 (15%), Wyoming, 378,616 (28.5%).  I have moved the Northern Colorado edition back to Colorado. Bellczar (talk) 09:32, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Northern Colorado edition 

message: The microfilm says Central Ohio split into Lima and Columbus Metropolitan on 3/4/1979.  Did Lima become Toledo-Lima?  Fuddle (talk) 03:20, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lima 

message: Historians studying "TV Guide" should be aware that InfoTrac microfilmed various editions in the early 1980s.  As I recall, those included the San Francisco Bay Area edition, the Kansas City edition and the New York City edition. This was the era when InfoTrac was on cartridges.Jab73 (talk) 10:11, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  1980s "TV Guide" Editions on Microfilm
Talk:Eve's pudding

message: Currently it says "[...] now made from apples and Victoria sponge cake mixture." which from my reading implies that previously it was not made with applies AND not made with Victoria sponge. But from what I can tell it has always been made using applies. Would it not be better to just remove the "now" since we already say later that the original versions do not use sponge. All this is _assuming_ that the original uses apples. -109.154.176.236 (talk) 22:11, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article wording should be made more explicit.
Talk:Congregation Beth Jacob (Galveston, Texas)

message: Can someone knowledgeable write about Beth Jacob and the various hurricanes?  What happened during Hurricane Carla in 1961?  Was the building destroyed?  The congregation dispersed?  What about during Hurricane Ike in 2008? Poldy Bloom (talk) 18:45, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hurricanes and Beth Jacob
Talk:Robert Davis (inventor)

message: From http://www.invaluable.co.uk/auction-lot/a-wooden-garden-bench-formerly-at-the-siebe-gorma-433-c-d02442da27  
"A wooden garden bench formerly at the Siebe Gorman premises:. Once the property of Sir Robert H. Davis the Managing Director of Siebe Gorman. The label inscribed 'In loving memory of Margaret Dear wife of Sir Robert H Davis'. " Darci (talk) 03:38, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wife
Talk:Gaelic broadcasting in Scotland

message: I think it is worth looking at rewording the lead of the article. Gaelic media is being talked about like a political issue, and while it does have political dimensions to it, this could be written in a much more factual and neutral way. Does anyone have any suggestions for how this could be done? JoshuaJohnLee talk softly, please 18:55, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead section
Talk:Lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase deficiency

message: I propose that Fish-eye disease be merged into Lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase deficiency. I think that the content in the Fish-eye disease article can easily be explained in the context of Lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase deficiency.  The language of Fish-eye disease would be useful in expanding the existing article.  The phrase "fish eye disease" already redirects to this article.  The Fish-eye disease article is a recent article. Jllm06 (talk) 14:28, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Adenosine monophosphate deaminase deficiency type 1

message: Why are all references to D-Ribose removed and instead it refers to generic ribose?
SiXiam (talk) 16:27, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  D-Ribose
File talk:07. Japanese Garden Pano, Cowra, NSW, 22.09.2006.jpg

message: Such a beautiful image this is; I felt I flew to heaven and back while watching it... -The Bold Guy- 13:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  its a shame the radio mast had to appear in the background though :)Silica-gel (talk) 13:21, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, someone should edit it out. --86.135.183.46 (talk) 23:52, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:Acute aortic syndrome

message: Circulation doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000170 JFW | T@lk 20:37, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: Currently doesn't have an article, but this source may help: doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001809 JFW | T@lk 15:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intramural haematoma
Talk:Adams–Oliver syndrome

message: This article was initially categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM:CAT. kilbad (talk) 16:56, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article categorization 

message: Introduction about anti drug campaign Mariangalicia (talk) 14:33, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-drug campaign
Talk:Alcoholic cardiomyopathy

message: Alcoholism is a growing issue in the world. I believe that it is important that information regarding alcoholic cardiomyopathy be easily accessible to the public. I came across this article and would like to work on adding information to it. The information that I would like to see added to this article should be easy to understand by both those knowledgeable in medicine and those without a background in medicine. 
The article lists the following sections: a general overview, signs and symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment. The article is quite simple and easy to read, however, additional information on pathophysiology should be added, as well as additional sources. There are only two sources listed in the article. One is a paper written in 1967 in CMAJ JAMC and the other is a source for medications used to treat alcoholic cardiomyopathy on www.drugs.com. These sources are neutral and the links are accessible, but they are out of date and not as reliable as other available sources. I tend to look up resources that are more current. 
The article says that alcoholic cardiomyopathy can be caused by chronic use of alcohol. I would like to add what would qualify as "chronic" alcohol use. Some facts that I noticed that were listed without having sources: the age and sex most commonly affected. As stated above, I would also like to include more information on the pathophysiology related to alcoholic cardiomyopathy. By understanding how alcohol is causing these heart issues, I believe individuals will be more likely to see how detrimental this health issue can be.  Roddamar (talk) 01:39, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alcoholic Cardiomyopathy Workplan  

message: — Assignment last updated by Roddamar (talk) 02:05, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: 2022-23 WikiMed Directed Studies

message: I agree that sources need to be updated and defining "chronic" alcohol use/abuse could be elaborated on. Please see link for additional suggestions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Roddamar/Alcoholic_cardiomyopathy/Nbnmaria_Peer_Review?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_peer_review Nbnmaria (talk) 16:53, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review
Talk:Angiomyolipoma

message: I don't know how to put up a [needs citation] notice, but stuff needs citation in this article! Shoe (talk) 21:50, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: There is strong evidence that AML is neoplastic, including monoclonality and genetic abnormalities. There are also (rare) examples of malignant transformation. See:
  
Ferry JA et al. Renal angiomyolipoma with sarcomatous transformation and pulmonary metastases. Am J Surg Path 1991; 15: 1083-8.
Hovea 01:27, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Angiomyolipoma" is the singular. The plural is either "angiomyolipomas" (English style) or "angiomyolipomata" (Ancient Greek style). This article misuses singular as plural throughout! 86.135.115.218 (talk) 22:21, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong plural throughout the article!
Talk:Aniseikonia

message: The following appears in the article as of the date and time of this post:
However, partial correction often improves the patient's vision comfort already significantly. Little is known yet about the possibilities of using surgical intervention to correct aniseikonia. 
It is followed by a hidden note.  Is this information up to date? Garvin (talk) 23:27, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Refractive surgery

message: I have taken another step to reconstruct this article.  I researched the Optical Diagnostics Website.  It is an information section from a site trying to sell a piece of diagnostic software.  While this is not consistent with Wikipedia Verifiability Standards, much of the information is still accurate.  I am making attempts to use other references to confirm facts used in that outside article.
I will do more as I find time.  Post any concerns or comments here or on my talk page. Garvin (talk) 21:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This content appears to have been added to the article but 'hidden'.  In other words, it can only be seen by viewing/editing the underlying source code.  —DIV (1.129.106.159 (talk) 05:18, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Jan 18, 2008

message: [Blank contribution by Special:Contributions/2601:2C3:4201:D70:CC1A:C3C1:6DB3:367B on 28 Feb 2020.]
:As a guideline:  "Talk pages are for discussing the article, not for general conversation about the article's subject".  Wikipedia is not a forum.
:The article does already address causes of aniseikonia under the heading "Causes".  If you feel that the article is incomplete or unclear, then please provide specific & constructive feedback on the Talk page.  Alternatively, if you are confident about what should be added or amended, then you can be bold and make the edits yourself!
:—DIV (1.129.106.159 (talk) 04:48, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: What causes aniseikonia?

message: Under "Diagnosis", the article emphasises the viewing of nearby objects.  This seems to imply that the effects are more obvious/problematic for near vision than for distance vision.  Could this please be clarified in the article, under either "Diagnosis" or "Symptoms".  
—DIV (1.129.106.159 (talk) 04:52, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symptoms in relation to distance of object viewed 

message: In recent years the "Shaw lens" has received publicity.  If it is just one of many alternatives available for specialised (iseikonic) spectacle lenses, then it should not be singled out in the article.  But if it is the market leader, or if it happens to use a technology widely acknowledged to be superior, then it probably could be mentioned, with appropriate citations of reliable third-party references.  (The same goes for any other company/brand.)
—DIV (1.129.106.159 (talk) 04:59, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shaw lens
Talk:Reverse zoonosis

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Reverse Zoonosis/Zooanthroponosis/Anthroponosis. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 22#Reverse Zoonosis/Zooanthroponosis/Anthroponosis until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Techie3 (talk) 10:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Reverse Zoonosis/Zooanthroponosis/Anthroponosis" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 16:25, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Reverse zoonosis →  – 
The page does not contain any sources supporting the opinion that "reverse zoonosis" is a common term. It should be moved to Anthroponosis according to sources like . --Hwem (talk) 06:25, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: I have converted this rename request into a templated RM - no content change. Primefac (talk) 07:41, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

text: So it seems like pretty much a wash. The article was stably at the title "Anthroponotic disease" for most of its history (since 2007). It was boldly moved to the current title in January of 2021. I'm neutral on the merits of the move for now, but wanted to at least share the above information in case it's helpful to other editors. Colin M (talk) 17:53, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 April 2022 

message: * I reverted edits that claimed that Reverse zoonosis and Anthroponosis are the same. --Hwem (talk) 05:28, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverts and original research
Talk:Arrhinia

message: A case of complete congenital arhinia was reported recently: 
http://www.al.com/news/mobile/index.ssf/2015/03/miracle_baby_eli_is_one_in_197.html 
While this is reported by a WP:RS, it's not a WP:MEDRS so can't be put in the article, but I thought it would still be useful to mention here. I wonder if it would be possible to track down a source for the figure cited of "only about 37 cases worldwide". -- 79.123.80.232 (talk) 12:47, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've dug a bit deeper, and found this: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3966695/ , which gives a figure of 43 cases reported as of 2014 since the first recorded report in 1931. -- 79.123.80.232 (talk) 12:52, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aspartylglucosaminuria

message: I am improving this page for a class project under the supervision of Mr. Travis Bohrer ( User:tbohrer74) at Waynesville High School.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hleasor (talk • contribs) 12:45, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: note