lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Westbourne, West Sussex

message: I'd like to add that it was named westbourne to differentiate it from eastbourne  (both in sussex) but ive no idea if that is really true?
If you can find a source please edit 
--195.137.34.85 23:39, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know your identity (pity!) but I would be willing to bet that this is NOT true. At the time of "naming" Eastbourne as we know it would have hardly existed. The suffix -bourne in the South Down area means a stream that is seasonal, coming out of the lower part of the chalk hills. A settlement in ancient times would have sprung up there to take advantage of the water supply. There are plenty of examples all the way along the Downs of names ending in -bourne and in fact Eastbourne doesn't really meet the original meaning! Peter Shearan 07:42, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.
Therefore, I suggest that villages within the parish with a one or two sentence article, ie Woodmancote, West Sussex (Chichester District)  to be merged and redirected to this parish article. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 07:52, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Removing merge proposal as both are seperate settlements and there has been zero interest in the merge (nearly 3 years been proposed). AssociateAffiliate (talk) 12:12, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 
Talk:Prosper Menière

message: His biography is in The Lancet JFW | T@lk 23:50, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article expanded by  a year ago on 14 November 2006, adding a complete copy (wikified) of . I've removed the copvio as per policy. Unless Ole Daniel Enersen, the owner/author of Whonamedit, has given specific permission to use the information, the material's copyright must be respected.  David Ruben  Talk  00:20, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: A bibliography and very basic information can be found at BIUM. In addition, they have a portrait (JPG) which is dated 1903 so is out of copyright. Colin°Talk 13:54, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps someone who's read up on French/international copyright could upload it? Ijustam (talk) 20:26, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: According to the French Wikipedia, the name of this person is not 'Prosper Ménière', but 'Prosper Menière' (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosper_Meni%C3%A8re). This was a French doctor, and I think they are probably right. There is a redirect page from 'Prosper Ménière' to 'Prosper Menière', which was created by BonifaceFR on 14 June 2014, with the comment "BonifaceFR a déplacé la page Prosper Ménière vers Prosper Menière par-dessus une redirection : typo. orthographe". This user has a quite impressive talk page, which suggests this is a heavy contributor to Wikipedia and probably trustworthy, also since no one reverted the creation of this redirect page. So I suggest we rename this page and Ménière's disease. Laurier (talk) 13:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I see there are still a lot of edits where one editor changes the name of this person to 'Ménière' and some one else changes it back to 'Menière'. The name of this wikipedia page and the name of wikipedia page about the disease still isn't changed. No one responded to my post here. Can someone please convince me that the first 'e' should or shouldn't have an accent? Laurier (talk) 14:32, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I suggest that you request a move of this page to "Prosper Menière" if you see fit to do so. Regarding not receiving any responses, this talk page has received 20 views in the past 12 months. Hrodvarsson (talk) 22:32, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename page?
Talk:GU Comics

message: Whats with the plethora of WoW comics?  Im quite sick of WoW and graduated to better games now.  Please try to do something else, WoW is for immature kiddies and not everyone who read your comics are 12 years old.
:So you honestly think all 11 million World of Warcraft players are immature and 12 years old? Seriously, grow up, and learn to sign your posts, please. 78.70.249.253 (talk) 21:31, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single video game??? 

message: The following section
Jack Thompson Controversy- GU Comics has, along with many other webcomics, on many occassions taken on anti-videogame campaigner and lawyer Jack Thompson through a combination of parodies in several comics, and raising awareness within the gaming community of the activities of Mr. Thompson. seems to lack a NPOV concerning Jack Thompson.  While I personally hold no love for the guy, the phrase "raising awareness" has a POV feel to it.  To almost seems akin to "raising awareness" for HIV/AIDS or the like. Mikemill 22:43, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it to sayGU Comics has, along with many other webcomics, on several occasions taken on lawyer Jack Thompson, known for his activism against violent video games, through a combination of parodies in several comics, and letting the gaming community know about the activities of Mr. Thompson.I hope this is better. Minirogue 00:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That works. I am not used to writing in an NPOV style, too against my nature I guess, so no worries--Breandán 02:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: This issue, for intents and purposes has been "resolved". If you would like to discuss it futher please use another form of communication to address it with me personally. Whearn 17:43, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandal Edits
Talk:Ordered ring

message: There is a fair amount of discussion on the ordered field entry about positive cones and the equivalence between the 'field with a compatible total order' definition and the 'field with a positive cone' definition.  I'm pretty sure that the same equivalence applies here as well.  Perhaps that discussion could be either moved here or factored into a separate page on positive cones?
Mdgeorge (talk) 21:01, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Positive cones 

message: I am very surprised by the first sentence of this article. I've been reading about noncommutative ordered rings for some time, for example in "A First Course in Noncommutative Rings" by Tsi-Yuen Lam. Here's what appears on page 272.
Historically, the first example of a noncommutative ordered division ring was constructed by Hilbert (in 1903), in connection with his study of the foundations of geometry. Hilbert's example, based on the use of twisted Laurent series, was later generalized by Mal'cev and Neumann in 1948–1949.
So surely the first sentence of this wikipedia article is wrong! Could someone please fix this? I am not an algebraist.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alan U. Kennington (talk • contribs) 05:09, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ordered rings are not necessarily commutative 

message: "Exactly one of the following is true: a is positive, -a is positive, or a = 0. This property follows from the fact that ordered rings are abelian, linearly ordered groups with respect to addition."
In fact it seems to follow directly from the assumption of a total order (specifically the connex property).— Pingkudimmi 09:27, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consequence of assuming a total order
Talk:Study Bible

message: Sectioned up the article for easier reading/added a section for online study bibles
--Virgil Vaduva 00:16, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: We probably need to do the same with online Bibles, but I'm not sure where it should go.  I really don't think long lists of links belong in this fairly unrelated article (I'm not sure if they belong anywhere on Wikipedia, but here is definitely not a good place). -- Jonmmorgan (talk) 11:08, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer (TV special)

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Why weren't you at elf practice. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 13#Why weren't you at elf practice until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  ~~~~User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:20, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Why weren't you at elf practice" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Is the Dolly for Sue section necessary? 100.7.44.80 (talk) 00:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dolly for Sue
Talk:Taiyuan

message: I try to add contents in the tourism section. There are many Family Compounds near Taiyuan, such as Qiao's Family Compound. I think it is necessary to introduce them. Gin sherry (talk) 20:01, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: During the Republic of China (1912-1949), the city's name was changed to "Yangqu", and it was not renamed back to "Taiyuan" until it was captured in 1949 by Communist forces.
One chinese have told me:
The sentence in wiki page of Taiyuan city is wrong.
Yangqu just a county in the north side of Taiyuan city.
Because in 1946 - 1949, the highest military organization in Shanxi (province) is named "太原綏靖公署", the meaning of first two Chinese characters is Taiyuan, 
and official newspaper offices also use "Taiyuan" in news.
VetMax (talk) 12:00, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Yangqu

message: Contrary to what the article says, lamb soup (羊肉汤) is not at all the same as yangrou za (羊肉杂).  Lamb soup is what a westerner might expect: lamb or mutton in broth with noodles.  Yangrou za is mixed sheep offal stir fried together, and is very popular in Taiyuan. Colin McLarty (talk) 06:02, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Food

message: I don't know where to report errors in English-langugage Wikipedia. They all concern the Chinese city of Taiyuan, so I report them here.
The multicolored map showing districts and counties of Taiyuan is correct  as far as I can see. It links to articles about city districts, i.a., Yingze District and Xiaodian District. Those two articles have got the maps showing "Location in Taiyuan" mixed. That should be corrected.
The article Taiyuan Metro has a Network Map which shows only Line 1, which is under construction. Line 2, which has been in operation since December 26, 2020, should also be  shown. Roufu (talk) 18:48, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map errors
Category talk:Masonic organizations

message: Why's there a wiki link to a List of Masonic organizations on a list of masonic organizations? Grye 00:23, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

message: The listing of Masonic organizations should NOT include the "Sect of Dionysus" as a Masonic organization, there is NO such Masonic group.
This is a typical defamation of Masons and Masonry that periodically poses as factual expose. A legitimate reference work should not host such nonsense. LAWinans (talk) 19:37, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  There Is NO Masonic "Dionysus" Group 

message: Although no longer officially affiliated with Freemasonry, OTO was modeled after and associated therewith. Certain degrees in OTO (I believe) used to be equivalent and transferable between those of Freemasonry. In any case, would OTO belong on this list?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.86.169.26 (talk) 01:19, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ordo Templi Orientis
Talk:Sensory illusions in aviation

message: The majority of the text of this article was edited out of the Spatial disorientation article. It needs some work, but seems like a worthwhile article to me. Kerowyn 00:27, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy edit

message: It really needs a bit more work.Brutaldeluxe (talk) 23:07, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: line 76

message: For this section you could cite https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-CiSqyK2H0&t=275s, roughly 4m40-4m55.
I don't know how to add a proper citation, nor whether this is appropriate. Just sayin'.
Mr badcrumble (talk) 22:15, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensory_illusions_in_aviation#Head-down_illusion<nowiki/>

message: Poorly written with pervasive use of unexplained jargon and passive constructions. And lacking citations.Jtcarpet (talk) 23:49, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style and citations 

message: Pls consider.
W. 172.114.225.4 (talk) 01:54, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, AF447 is a prime example of pilot disorientation in instrument conditions ElectronicsForDogs (talk) 15:26, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add us air 1016 And AF 447 crashes to examples?
Talk:Darija

message: The name darija is reserved for the arabic dialect used by tunisian people , and Darija is an arab dialect , most words are from arabic , and some words are berber, although the article say the opposite, well even the name which is Darija is an arabic name , since it means in standard arabic The most used ,or the widely used  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.225.59.146 (talk) 11:57, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darija is not berber 

message: I've just added the  template. This article is a should-be merged and of course a redirect.  Cheers -- Szvest 00:28, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The article stands by itself now, no need to merge anymore --Khalid hassani 13:14, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: It's hard to see why there is both a Darija and Maghrebi Arabic article. If there is indeed some strong distinction then the articles should be edited to clarify that - but otherwise they should be merged. Snori (talk) 15:57, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, definitely merge. Anyone around to do it? Ilyacadiz (talk) 22:24, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: This article says Darija are Berber dialects. I always thought (and the article Maghrebi Arabic confirms it) that Darija is a form of colloquial Arabic! (With possible Berber influences, of course).
Completely different language subfamily! It cannot both be true.
Perhaps if the articles are merged, this can be fixed too? I'm not well enough versed in this subject to do it myself.
Ruud Harmsen (talk) 19:33, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Darija is Berber??

message: Darija is not a Berber dialects ! actually it's Arabic dialects ! 
please correct this mistake !  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.141.25.157 (talk) 01:49, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  mistake !
Talk:Hempstead High School (Iowa)

message: I went to Hempstead, and I can remember how uncomfortable that place got during the first and last months of the school year.  Beats me how the district thought students were going to be able to learn in that oven.
JesseG 00:43, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Music is not an extracurricular activity; daily attendance is required, a grade affects your GPA, and concerts are a required activity. Sure, there are a few options that go outside the curriculum, but I recommend that most of the Music section be moved outside Extracurricular.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.130.35 (talk) 01:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music is not extracurricular. Suggesting edit 

message: This article has been extensively  cleaned up  by  regular editors from  the Wikipedia schools project. Many  sections still  require sourcing  and if not  soon  supported by  reliable sources will also  be removed. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:15, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up
Talk:Secretariat of Intelligence/Archive 1

message: This should not have been a new article. Secretaría de Inteligencia de Estado should simply have been moved to the new name. -- Necrothesp 18:33, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, sorry, did not know about that, I am pretty new to Wikipedia. Still, Secretaría de Inteligencia de Estado and SIDE should point to Secretaría de Inteligencia and S.I, since most people still use the old names. --San Marcos 03:21, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving

message: The article contains a lot of baised, irrelevant information. For example the article outlines various cases in which there are rumors of SI (side) involvemenment. Nevertherless, this information comes from some local newspapers that do not have any reliable source. Pagina12 for examples is an left wing newspaper which always intends attack the SI in their articles. The idea of this article is to inform about the SI, not to outline rumours that are spread about it, wikipedia should be an objetive source of information, further reading can be done in these newspapers websites. Furthermore, the secret laws have been abolished by the senate, so the information present in the article is old.  Nabu 13:13, 28 August 2005 (GMT -3)
:I am sorry, most of the information comes from the press, all of the information on the article is proven. Newspapers are not rumors tabloids. Many of these were admitted by SIDE itself, and proven in judicial investigations (AMIA Case, Piqueteros, Brives) And seeing as *I* wrote 100% of the article, and collected all the information, and you, nothing, I believe I should have a word. Check the sources, it is all proven information. Also you keep vandalizing the page, anonymously, changing work that has been done. Let's end the controversy. It's up for an editor to see what stays or not. Don't vandalize the page again. And learn how to properly edit a Talk page before doing so, as well as try reading the previous point. Also I am going to have to change a the wording of the page, seeing as you tirelessly try to change it back. --San Marcos 21:53, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, most controversial points have been solved, but the article still needs editing --San Marcos 22:21, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This issue has been solved. --San Marcos 07:28, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Content
Talk:1582

message: If Akechi Mitsuhide died in 1582, how was he born in 1628? Time machine? Jon 01:30, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is that listed here with "date unknown", when http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conquest_of_the_Azores says it was on August 2, 1583?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.249.245.7 (talk) 23:47, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conquest of the Azores 

message: After October 4, shouldn't each date be denoted as being under the Gregorian or Julian calendar?  This should be true of all date references from October 5, 1582 (Julian calendar - October 15 by Gregorian) to January 13, 1929 (Gregorian calendar - December 31, 1928 by Julian calendar) inclusive.  Also note that George Washington's birthday is 11 Feb 1731 by local reckoning which started the new year on March 25, but 22 Feb 1732 by the new reckoning implemented in the British Empire in 1752.  Again, the dates should be indicated as whether they are using the Gregorian calendar and modern New Year's Day rules. GBC (talk) 01:09, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Julian or Gregorian? 
Talk:Saga of the Greenlanders

message: For the first item, there is an ugly 1 in the title because of the footnote. Is there a way of getting rid of the 1 without removing the footnote? It appears as "1.1 Colonization of Greenland1" on the TOC.
--Naelphin 02:21, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, I hadn't noticed this. Trying a few things with preview doesn't yield a solution. - Haukur 02:45, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 1 in contents list

message: Although my knowledge of latin dipthongs is sketchy, I think it's supposed to be æ instead of œ in the article title. Awickert (talk) 00:54, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I finally looked into this, and I see both in use; the form of the sagas that I read used the æ, so that is what I was familiar with. Does anyone here know enough of Scandinavian languages to be able to tell us which one it is? For the moment I'm going to create a redirect and note the alternate spelling in the lede. Awickert (talk) 07:54, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Grœnlendinga saga is the normalized Old Norse spelling, Grænlendinga saga is the normalized modern Icelandic spelling. Haukur (talk) 10:35, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well that explains it; thank you very much. I'll clarify in the text of the article. Awickert (talk) 16:47, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: I googled the 3quotations in the article, and reattributed from "Reeves's translation" to "Beamish" (North Ludlow Beamish).  
Googling showed quotes were not in Reeve's The Finding of Wineland the Good: The History of the Icelandic Discovery of America given. They were in Beamish (1841). 
Sure, the very text was reprinted in Norse Discovery of America 1906 given as "Reeves et al.", but the book co-authored by Beamish also, so thinking it was "Reeves's translation" was an erroneous assumption. --Kiyoweap (talk) 11:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reattributing quotes from Reeves tr. to Beamish
Talk:Original Prankster

message: Was the title of this song intended to mock Ice-T's 1991 rap album OG: Original Gangster?-Albrozdude 01:45, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ice-T 
Talk:Dean Witter Reynolds

message: The last edit changed the origin of Dean Witter from San Francicso to Calcutta.  No evidence is given, and other web resources indicate the company was founded in San Francisco.  I reverted to the previous version.  If anyone has evidence of origins in Calcutta, please post it.
Carax 19:12, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Founding

message: Penny stocks 107.127.18.64 (talk) 00:53, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What would happen to penny stocks years after someone dies?
Talk:Southeast Christian Church

message: I removed a reference to an alleged anti-Catholic incident at the church's retreat center, as I could find no verification. Realkyhick 01:46, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Anti-Catholic incident

message: Some people who have edited this article have used it as a chance to proselytize by dumping a bunch of scripture into this article; others who are not fond of the church have used it for their own agenda to make the church look bad and emphsize a controversy that happend two years ago. Let's remember what Wikipedia is about: objective information. Both sides need to use restraint. I think it is fair to include the mission statement and some of the beliefs expected of members of the church. It is also fair to mention any controversies that have been documented without deleting everything else.Mazeface 13:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaning up

message: I'm not sure that the "Beliefs" section, even though a factual representation, is notable in an encyclopedic sense.  Is there anything that makes this list of beliefs different from other similar churches? Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 16:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Beliefs

message: There has clearly been a large amount of material taken directly from their website. We will need to figure out what can stay. --Jprg1966 (talk) 18:01, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently taken care of by  --Jprg1966 (talk) 19:44, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Copypaste