lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Climbing galaxias

message: The common name for this fish has been changed to Koaro from Climbing galaxias.  Justification apparently is that this is the name used by Fishbase.
Koarao is a maori name not used outside New Zealand.  This species has an extensive range within Australia, easily exceeding the total land mass of New Zealand.  I contend that it is more appropriate to use the generic English term Climbing galaxias for this species, regardless of what Fishbase currently says.  The name Climbing galaxias is also descriptive of one of the main characteristic features of this fish, its ability to climb verticle rock surfaces and hence overcome obstacles to upstream movement.
Supporting References:
*Australian Museum Online
*Master Index of Freshwater Fishes
*Australian Department of Environment and heritage
*NBII
*ANGFA
Any thoughts before I change it back.  Nick Thorne 02:57, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it, Nick.  My only rationale in changing the name to koaro was to conform to Fishbase (which was confirmed by NIWA). I had been informed by an Administrator that Wikipedia followed Fishbase exclusively, so thanks for pointing out that this is not always the case.  Common sense prevails!  Happy to make the changes for you, Nick, unless you'd prefer to do them yourself. BTW, while we're at it, are there any more NZ/Aust fish that need the names fixed? GrahamBould 07:42, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Note that we don't follow FishBase exclusively for common names (e.g. parore, dover sole). We use it as a guideline if in doubt. Gdr 10:42, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Common Name
Talk:Skybus (Aqua Avia)

message: From what I can tell from this article, the airline never started operations. As such, should it be included as an historical airline in Airlines of New Zealand Template? All the other airlines included in the template operated services. Additionally, as it never commenced operations, is it right to class it as a defunct airline? From what I can tell, the Defunct Airlines Category is intended for airlines which have ceased operating, as opposed to those which were proposed, but failed to commence operations. Nick Moss 02:57, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion in the Airlines of New Zealand Template, and Categorisation 
Talk:Minneapolis Auditorium

message: this picture is not the minneapolis auditorium.  it is northrup auditorium on the university of minnesota campus which still stands 
: Added image.  This is certainly not Northrup Auditorium. ~ Tropicalsundae (talk) 21:36, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Church of Saint Peter, Hamburg

message: Grooming a few things....according to the German WP, the H&M posters do not fund the organ; there was a discrepancy about the height of the tower; correcting translation....Herbivore (talk) 15:29, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Misc

message: I don't know what the protocol is on naming, whether it should be St Petri's or St Peter's...any thoughts?--Diogenes00 03:05, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change to St Peter's? 

message: I removed the cleanup english tag because it seems that Herbivore did a good job on that back in October.  Just trying to whittle away at the copyedit backlog where I can.  :)  Amers4 06:44, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: copyedit
Talk:Like a Hurricane (song)

message: --------------
Recent comment:
YES--This song is one of the few true rock anthems.  Its theme resonates with almost anyone whoever lived (esp. during the 60's and 70's).  And that theme seems somehow mirrored in the music and the guitar ride.  I'm from New Orleans but first heard the song after getting off an airplane from New York in August of 1977.  My home town tells you I know about hurricanes.  But I can relate to the entire song.  Use your imagination.
PS--I also like way the organ slips in for "that special moment when time just slips away...."
--------------
I added some details here, but i am not sure it actually deserves it's own article.  -- Beardo 03:07, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The above statements were in the article, but have been removed, because apparently no article has critical praise like this. With this removed, the song does not seem notable anymore. I'm confused. --EdgeNavidad (talk) 12:32, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deserves own article? 

message: Did they play it live a lot, or is it just a quirk that it's on two live albums of theirs ?  -- Beardo 12:17, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roxy Music 

message: This has been added to the category 1977 singles yet the text says it was not released as a single.  Can't be both. -- Beardo 01:02, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See the link I added in the article: apparently it has been released as a single. --Pie.er 07:21, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single or not 

message: Hey there,
at first I excuse myself for my poor English.
In the chapter cover versions is written that "Randy Bachman and Burton Cummings perform the song on their album of cover songs Jukebox released in 2008".
I was curious how Randy Bachman would play this great song. I started to search for this album, I found it, but there wasn't hurricane on it. You can see it par example on allmusic.com, also on discogs.com, where you can find pictures of the title list. If you have better informations please let me know it.
88.73.10.59 (talk) 16:00, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover versions
Talk:Adil Ray

message: I am concerned about the fact that a potential contributor to the article is a personal friend of Adil Ray. I urge other editors to closely monitor the content of this article to prevent NPOV material from emerging. Please see the bottom of my user talk page for details. TYelliot | Talk  | Contribs 15:07, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI 
Talk:Lists of fictional locations

message: I moved Multiverse from the list of places to the see also section (linked to Multiverse (science), as it's not exactly fictional. The related page Parallel universe (fiction) is already in the list of fictional places. If there are any objections, feel free to change as appropriate, just please make sure to not link to the disambiguation page for Multiverse - link through to the correct page. Thanks. --Mbell 03:19, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006 

message: Please see: Wikipedia:Locations in fiction, fictional locations, and settings.—Lady Aleena talk/contribs 20:38, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Policy proposal

message: I had a hard time coming up with many examples. Is this a fitting addition to the fictional-place and fictional-thing realm? List of fictional rooms. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 22:20, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional rooms? 

message: *
*
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional counties (3rd nomination)
I've added some sources. More are out there.  Important literary device.  Important list for some of our readers.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: [[List of fictional counties]] up for deletion
Talk:The Archaeology of Knowledge

message: We need sources for summary/analysis of the work. Extensive quoting of the work may help make this easier. Byelf2007 (talk) 20 September 2012
:Extensive quoting of the book is probably not a good idea. It would be better to summarize secondary sources. Fortunately, there are many of them. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 06:34, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: This article needs sources

message: The article had more detail before we took the majority of it out. There is a good amount of detail now. Should we keep up the banner a while longer or is it now unnecessary? Byelf2007 (talk) 1 December 2012
: Keep, of course, maybe even 'needs a complete rewriting'? --Aleksd (talk) 00:49, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Keep or remove 'needs expert attention'?

message: I don't think copy & paste works in a text, just because somewhere else a sentence has a meaning taking it out of context and putting it into a new one, only because the source seems reliable is not a very thoughtful thing. I mean if you don't have understanding of a topic not writing is better than simply copy&pasting 
this passage and probably other from Stanford encyclopedia
Foucault's explicitly presents The Order of Things as an “archaeological” approach to the history of thought. Three years later, in 1969, he published The Archaeology of Knowledge, a methodological treatise that explicitly formulates what he took to be the archeological method that he used not only in The Order of Things but also (at least implicitly) in History of Madness and The Birth of the Clinic. The premise of the archaeological method is that systems of thought and knowledge (epistemes or discursive formations, in Foucault's terminology) are governed by rules, beyond those of grammar and logic, that operate beneath the consciousness of individual subjects and define a system of conceptual possibilities that determines the boundaries of thought in a given domain and period. 
and also I am not quite sure 'promoting' is the best verb in describing philosophical works
The Archaeology of Knowledge (French: L'archéologie du savoir) ....is a methodological and historiographical treatise promoting what Foucault calls "archaeology" or the "archaeological method"
Philosophy is not marketing and it is not a MALL of promotions--Aleksd (talk) 00:43, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete copy & paste
Talk:Rayman (character)

message: Now I'm no expert, and neither do I know what was there before, but it seems insane that there are articles called Rayman (video game), Rayman (series) and Rayman (character), but no article under the namespace Rayman as of 19:46 today. Surely one of the three should be moved to the main namespace? U-Mos 20:44, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Rayman]] no longer exists 

message: Okay, call me absolutely insane for not getting this, but why is the Reception section entirely about the Rabbids, and not Rayman himself?--184.100.239.59 (talk) 10:13, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: We need a new picture for Rayman. the art of him from Rayman M is SOOOOOOOO 12 years ago. There is plenty of newer official art of Rayman on the internet. I would prefer using the one from Legends, but you can use the one from Origins or, heck, even Raving Rabbids! Just use a more recent picture.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.69.135.40 (talk) 19:00, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Picture for Rayman
Talk:Lambda Sigma Upsilon

message: This article has some problems with images, 1 being the massive photo of the group of men, and the other is the sheer number of photos is overwhelming.  Please see this, as it backs me up with both issues. If you-Monarca- could remove some photos so that I do not have to choose which ones go, that would be appreciated. And you were saying before about the photo needing to be big so people can see each person in the photo, well there are a huge number of photos which are massive but kept as a thumbnail so as to no disturb the text. Some examples would be the first two photos on the NHL page or the second painting-Titan's goblet- on Thomas Cole's page. Passionless -Talk 06:47, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As for the 'notable alumni'- I looked through them and by their positions/titles alone I doubt any of them would stand against an Article for Deletion process. Although many actors/professors/CEOs have wikipedia pages, only the most notable of these have pages while the majority are lesser known and have no reliable sources to prove there notability. Passionless -Talk 21:24, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:Phi Mu Delta

message: It appears that much of the content of this article is a WP:COPYVIO. Most of it matches, word for word, content from this page  It's possible that this is a false match, and that the website copied Wikipedia, but I kinda doubt it. The Wikipedia article has a few typographic idiosyncrasies that suggest it was copied from somewhere else (odd carriage returns, and the use of 'curly' quotation marks). Regardless, it's way, way too promotional, and it's removal is no great loss. This level of minutia is better served on the fraternities own website where is can be properly curated anyway. Grayfell (talk) 06:12, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Probable copyvio
Talk:Pi Lambda Phi

message: Much of this article is directly copied or indirectly paraphrased from official (copyrighted) Pi Lambda Phi material. This is plagiarism. --OSUKid7 03:00, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism 
Talk:Thrifty Foods

message: Uhm. Someone want to, say, delete this or mark it for serious problems?
Why? Seems to need expansion, but it's a well-written stub. Quadra 22:57, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Thrifty Foods updated their logo in January 2017, so this should be updated on this page.
You can view the new logo on their corporate website here in the top left corner: https://www.thriftyfoods.com/
===Reply===
 You need to upload the logo along with all relevant licensing in the metadata before we can add it to the article. Please see WP:UPIMAGE for more information about this process. Regards, Spintendo ᔦᔭ 02:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request Thrifty Foods Logo 

message: You need to upload the logo along with all relevant licensing in the metadata before we can add it to the article. Please see WP:UPIMAGE for more information about this process. Regards, Spintendo ᔦᔭ 02:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply
Talk:Zeta Beta Tau

message: I pledged in 1993. That was the word used. 14 weeks I think. Pledges were lined up for hours, made to do things in sub zero weather for 6+ hours, scavenger hunt, hell week, etc.. I never heard of this Associated Membership. This article mentioned No Pledging a few times, but reality is different. Every chapter we visited in mid 1990s also had pledges. I believe this should be mentioned in the article. Also there was maybe 1 Jewish member in the fraternity, the rest were Irish, Italian, Puerto Rican, Filipino and AA. Cheers! Meishern (talk) 07:31, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Pledging since 1989 

message: Should the events at Rider and Miami universities really be included in this article?  It does not appear that they garnered any type of attention except for campus news.  I think they should be removed. Gooseneck41 15:35, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, neither of those events seems particularly "controversial" or notable. -Drdisque (talk) 18:40, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversies
Talk:Ziz

message: Would it be possible to add a picture of this bird, preferably similar to the image on the German version of this page, or one depicting the mythical banquet at the end of the world.66.24.229.233 00:14, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: can someone point toward sources for anything in this article?--Andymussell 23:26, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources 

message: Well... The Bible never really speaks of the Ziz, and neither does the Torah, as the Torah is part of the Bible. There is probably apocryphal lit. talking about the Ziz, however if there is, it is currently unknown to me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimmy10291 (talk • contribs) 01:02, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the german article, David Kimchi (1160-1235) described it briefly in a commentary of Psalm 50,11 and Yehuda Leib Karmenitz wrote an essay :"Ziz Shadai" in 1600.125.225.66.199 (talk) 14:09, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: sources 

message: Is it me or the association of both terms "arab" and "marauding" reveal a biassed and personal reflexion? In that case, may we discuss the pertinence of such telling in an article devoted to knowledge. Hope I did'nt hurt anyone.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.161.244.29 (talk) 22:25, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the reference to marauding arabs. Daf (talk) 00:25, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ???? 

message: "Behemoth, Leviathan and Ziz were traditionally a favorite decoration motif for rabbis living in Germany."
What kind of random unsubstantiated factoid is that? And searching for this I found that apparently it said "Russia" before. Please, if this is not the made-up irrelevant nonsense it appears to be, do protest. Otherwise I'm going to remove this one of these days. --Mudd1 (talk) 10:47, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. --Mudd1 (talk) 09:45, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fun fact?
Talk:Rob Cohen

message: While visiting this page earlier this evening, I noticed an error within one of the links. If a user/reader goes to Rob's filmography and click on the link for the 2012 film xXx: The Return of Xander Cage, it just redirects to the main xXx article. And there is no clear mention of a 2012 sequel starring Vin Diesel. The only mention of a sequel is the 2005 sequel "State of the Union" starring Ice Cube. Should this link be fixed to direct to the appropriate article (if there is one) or removed until such article exists? User Aidensdaddy2k9 23:52 8/16/2011  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aidensdaddy2k9 (talk • contribs) 03:53, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with Redirection From This Page 

message: On 21 February 2019, Rob Cohen's daughter released a statement alleging, among other things, that he had sexually assaulted her as a child. There are, as of the time of posting, two independent reliable sources documenting the allegation, one of which also contains his response.
Since the first mention of the daughter's statement, someone at IP address 144.121.68.21 has four times (as of the time of posting) deleted all mention of the story. I and others have reverted these changes each time. 
I'm inviting the editor at that IP address to explain their reasons for deleting this information. If the editor persists in deleting the information, I will seek dispute resolution.
Siobhán (talk) 18:16, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allegations of Sexual Assault 

message: This page has been subject to two different types of deleterious edits in the past 48 hours: the aforementioned content deletions by 144.121.68.21; and edits made by a group of anonymous users, which are changing Valkyrie Weather's name to her deadname, changing her pronouns to male, and changing the word "daughter" to "son". Some of these edits have included denigrations of Ms. Weather, including referring to her as "retarded".
I am requesting, due to the increased media attention on the issue of Mr. Cohen and Ms. Weather, that this page be semi-protected for 30 days.
Siobhán (talk) 03:10, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: Xx 116.71.7.73 (talk) 05:37, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  XXX vaido 

message: Xxx
Xxx 103.7.79.24 (talk) 21:16, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: xxx 103.121.7.246 (talk) 02:53, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xxx 

message: 1335
1 2402:3A80:852:9454:0:69:B485:5A01 (talk) 17:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xxxx 

message: Xxx 189.250.129.7 (talk) 12:19, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xxx
Talk:The Postman Always Rings Twice (1946 film)

message: *  ... plot synopsis, review, cast, production credits, awards
Reference available for citing in the article body. Erik (talk) 20:06, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allmovie 

message: This needs to be The Postman Always Rings Twice (1946 film), to distinguish it from The Postman Always Rings Twice (1981 film).  As it stands, it looks as if it was the only film of this title, which is not true.   
I understand my preferred title is currently a redirect, and those looking for this page get here quickly, but that's not the point.  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 21:31, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, many younger people would not even be aware of any version other than the 1981 version, and would type in The Postman Always Rings Twice (film) but discover it's not what they want.  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 01:30, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguator

message: Unlikely to be a coincidence, Old Nick, Persephone.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.0.165.56 (talk) 02:24, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: The old Nick and Cora
Category talk:MU* games

message: Seems this category is starting to find some non-notable articles that are basically ads for someones MUD and provide little encylopedic value. I seem to recall having this problem before in the previous category...
I think perhaps we should go through the list and do a bit of cleanup. I'm not overly familiar with MUSH'ing, so I honestly have no idea about which of those are notable, but I'm going to go ahead and notability mark a few of the others.
If anyone wants to assist, please do. This is an encylopedia, not a MUD listing. :)
--Phorteetoo 04:13, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been doing some pruning here and there; trying to get rid of most of the vanity/advertising, guides/faqs and instruction manuals that are dotted around in the MUD catagory. Although like you I've not much idea what is notable or not.Marasmusine 14:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Some ideas of what makes a MUD notable have been discussed in the Talk:MUD page.  Essentially to be notable a MUD must have been operating for a fair number of years, have, or have had a sizable player base, and have had notable impact on the MUD community (for better or for worse).  --Thoric 14:26, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds reasonable. Much more reasonable than those who admit they don't know what is notable doing the tagging and nominating. That excludes me as well, as I have no idea either. :-) Carcharoth 15:44, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've started pruning as well. I am very involved with the MUSHing community and honestly? I wouldn't even put my own game on here. MUSHes by and large are not notable. Any of them. Rubydanger (talk) 03:22, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:X Division

message: I addded a criticism section because without one, this article is pov.  It is a wide opinion around the Internet these days, especially among fans of true wrestling promotions such as WWE or RoH. 205.166.61.142 02:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the Criticism section entirely. You'rte right that it's warranted in being there but its NOT warranted without any citations/sources, of which iit had none.BooyakaDell 05:02, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: i have placed it back in... as the part can be referenced have been tagged so that they infact can be.
While I think whoever started this whole criticism section crap is a complete know-nothing with his head stuck up.... a sewer pipe (if you get my metaphor), I do agree that this comment, "Its high-flying style had been one of the key reasons viewers tuned into the former-WCW and ECW promotion's cruiserweight divisions." isn't that neutral. Though I agree with it, it can't really be said as fact. 70.109.124.6 (talk) 22:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism Section 

message: does it belong to the NWA or TNA? or is it free for any promotion to use --99.101.160.159 (talk) 17:57, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ownership of X-Division name? 

message: How was the X Division de-emphasized in 2004 and 2006?  In fact, last I checked, it was highlighted with a World X Cup in both years.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dstebbins (talk • contribs) 23:45, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  de-emphasized in 04 & 06 
Talk:Toronto Terrorist Cell

message: This is a very basic article.  I felt something should be added.  As this is my first new article on Wikipedia, please let me know if you find any obvious screwups as to etiquette, etc.  Thanks.--Blah.blah.blah 04:18, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We already have 2006 Toronto terrorism arrests.  Perhaps you could merge this article into that?  This article does not cite sources, see WP:VERIFY and WP:CITE.  Mr Stephen 10:14, 5 June 2006 (UTC)