lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Galen Center

message: Are you sure the basketball teams practice at the North Gym?  I was always under the impression that they practice at the Lyons Center. Cdbavg400 05:03, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The North Gym is in the Lyon Center.  It was a basketball court on the 2nd floor across from the current rec basketball courts.  As of fall 2007, the North Gym was filled with weight and cardio equipment and basketball hoops were taken out.  You can still see the old basketball hardwood floor, the scoreboard on the wall, and the baskets hanging from the ceiling, however. Yesitsnot (talk) 05:46, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm sorry, this is the North Gym: http://www.usc.edu/bus-affairs/ticketoffice/venues/north.html Yesitsnot (talk) 07:57, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: North Gym

message: I removed a well-meaning Galen Center external link that goes to USC's athletic dining facility (also called the Galen Center and named after the same donor).  The dining Galen Center is located behind Heritage Hall and was finished in the 1999.  Be careful of confusing the two in links.  Bobak 22:53, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Galen Center external link... 

message: I was under the impression that the Galen Center was funded entirely by USC, and did not receive and public funds.  Is this incorrect? Trojan traveler 02:36, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tax Revenue

message: Notice that if you're looking at the upper level of the stadium on the east side, luxury suites can clearly be viewed on the top level.  I was sitting behind the basket in the student section and looked to the west side of the arena, seeing a similar level up there, but with nothing inside.  The lights are always off on where the west side luxury suites should be, and the level seems to be empty.  Does anyone have any sources on the fact that the Galen Center seems unfinished? Yesitsnot (talk) 07:24, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unfinished luxury boxes on west side 
Talk:Homo Homini Lupis

message: This article needs to be moved to "Homo Homini Lupus". After all, lupus is latin for wolf, but what is a "lupis"? Indeed, the title of the episode is likely quoting Thomas Hobbes who said (in Latin) that man is a wolf to his fellow man (echoing a line from Plautus: lupus est homo homini) --165.123.138.170 05:11, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While I suppose that the Latin can be argued, the episode title is unquestionably "Homo Homini Lupis". The article needs to remain where it is. Perhaps the Latin usage could be explained under the "Trivia" section of the article, however. -Digresser 20:36, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean the Latin can be argued? There's no question that the title is meaningless as it is. It is actually more likely that there's simply a typo in title on the official website --165.123.138.170 06:59, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The official title is "Homo Homini Lupus". I have the DVD collection right in front of me as I type, and I've checked a few other sources. The page has to stay as is, regardless of any errors on the part of the person in charge of titling episodes.-Digresser 07:20, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume you mean that the official title is "Homo Homini Lupis", otherwise, the page should indeed not stay where it is. Well, then, this is oficially an episode with a meaningless title. --165.123.138.170 20:58, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Come Out, Ye Black and Tans

message: Found here:
http://www.chivalry.com/cantaria/lyrics/black-tans.html
I am going to put the link on the main page.  There is a html comment there that the lyrics are copyrighted, but surely fair use would allow them to be re-printed?  In any case, is it ok to link?
The mp3's on the cantaria site are seemingly ok: http://www.chivalry.com/cantaria/copyright.html
Is there official policy on lyrics?
: If this was written by Dominic Behan who died in 1989 then putting these lyrics up is a copyright violation. About another 50 years or so before they become public domain. Please also see notices put on other articles you have submitted. Thanks --Richhoncho 16:42, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics/MP3's 

message: Seems like an important missing piece of info. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:40, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was this written?
Talk:Donnie Spragan

message: This article has been nominated for a speedy. He clearly isn't a speedy deletion as being a linebacker in the NFL is clearly an assertion of notability. Further, he clearly meets WP:BIO as a NFL player so please don't nominate people who clearly meet WP:BIO for deletion. Capitalistroadster 05:20, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: CSD nomination

message: *Was named MVP in 1999 However I don't know enough about this particular matchup to add it in (seems he was part of all western team).
Also it is unclear what happened to him after he was injured in 1999, did he spend all of 2000 recovering? Did he play Arena Football League maybe?
Z Doc 21:47, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info that needs to go in 
Talk:Arrano beltza

message: This is incorrect. Could it be bad mediaeval Latin? Or did the original authors of the article made a typographical error? I don't know. I check the Spanish article and it makes the same mistake. Regum isn't a word.
"Rex Hispanorum Regum, that is, "King of the Kings of the Hispanians" (or "Spaniards")
It could be Rex Hispanorum Regium (King of Kings of the Spains or of the Spaniards") but the word order seems a bit strange esp. for mediaeval Latin. What about Rex Hispanorum Regnum, King of the Realm of the Spaniards? THat's equally viable. Anyway, it's not right and I think it should be.
:No, that's not equally viable, that would be wrong. It would need to be Rex Hispanorum Regni. —Nightstallion (?) 18:18, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The genitive of reges is regum. Compare with ultima ratio regum. You will have to paint it all over Jerusalem. --Error 19:52, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issue with the Latin translation 

message: The article is a little confuse in its last paragraph. The only time the Arrano Beltza has been waved in the Basque Country by Spanish nationalists (neo-nazis), they came from Madrid in buses. 
I can tell, becuse my sister is pretty much fascist pro-Spanish herself, that near no locals go to such provocations. The occasion when my sister went, she was the only one (and of course they were heavily protected by the police). 
By the way it's worth to notice that Hispanorum has a geographical meaning (equivalent to modern Iberia). Spain as nation-state didn't exist in the times of Sancho III. 
I'm going to edit the confuse part. --Sugaar 04:32, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Spanish nationalist using it were from Madrid!
Talk:Deneb (Ogre Battle)

message: The title of this article doesn't conform to norms on Wikipedia. It would be better if it were moved to Deneb (Ogre Battle) or at the very least Deneb (witch). Dave 14:47, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 
Talk:Princess Tutu

message: I have moved the older discussions to Archive page 2. I have also done a cleanup on the article as well as adding more information and I created a separate "Characters" article. The Plot section is still way too long and needs to be summarized rather than a recount of all the story details. Some issues from the older discussions may still remain, if so, list them here. Aldebaran66 (talk) 19:45, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: The article presently has this show listed as Shonen. Is it? Or is it Shoujo? It seems to be the latter according to anime websites. Titanium Dragon (talk) 07:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The manga ran in the shōnen manga magazine Champion Red, so the demographic is most definitely shōnen and not shōjo. There had been a previous dispute over whether Champion Red was a shōnen or a seinen magazine because a few people were judging demographics based on the content or art styles instead of the declared target audience (hence why there are so many citations for the magazine's demographic). —Farix (t | c) 22:06, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Titanium Dragon (talk) 04:52, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Shonen or Shoujo?
Talk:Nuclear War (card game)

message: Can I get change for 25 million people? - MyrddinEmrys 07:51, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dark Humor 

message: This doesn't mention the Spy or Sabatuer cards.207.69.137.38 03:02, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spys 

message: Where can you get a set?
:Many internet games stores of the type advertised on Board Game Geek would sell it. You could also follow the external links to either the publisher's or the designer's website, both of whom sell the game. - Waza 00:00, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Availability 

message: So they had a Kickstarter campaign and have a new edition out.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/994700393/nuclear-war-card-game-50th-anniversary-edition  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.57.160.102 (talk) 04:56, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  50th Anniversary Edition 

message: The box pictured in the article is not from the original 1965 release. It's probably from Flying Buffalo's late 1970s rerelease. I have a copy of what I think is probably the original release, or a reprinting of same. I bought it back in the 70s when I first got into gaming, and it may have been before Flying Buffalo's republishing the game; the gaming store (the original Compleat Strategist in NYC) probably had acquired stock that was even then a decade old.
The original box (or at least, the one I bought) had red lettering on a plain white background, and on the bottom panel had a copyright notice of 1965 by Douglas Malewicki. The cards were plain black print, no color. MarkVolundNYC (talk) 06:57, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original 1965 Release
Talk:The Glamorous Life

message: I have tagged this page as not having a NPOV, and this page contains unreferenced material. It appears that this page has been used primarily for Melissa Tkautz instead of Sheila E., who originally performed the song. It also appears that there has only been one contributor to this article, Rafael.minogue , during the time information was added for Melissa Tkautz. It appears this article needs cleanup and information reverted to Sheila E., with a separate page for Melissa Tkautz to prevent confusion. I think it would be nice to hear other opinions so we can better cleanup this article. Ajwebb 20:25, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagged
Talk:BG Group

message: if someone could centre the text in the board of tables i've just inserted that would be great. Dexcel (talk) 07:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:4-Dimethylaminopyridine

message: 1. The mechanism shown in the picture was not correct. In the nucleophilic reaction pathway is no appearence of a tetrahedral intermediat.
2. This mechanism is accepted for a variety of anhydrides!! Not only acetic anhydride.
3. A better picture of the reaction mechanism will come up soon.
The author of the cited chemistry paper,
I. Held  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.84.255.217 (talk) 14:11, August 30, 2007 (UTC) 
Shouldn't "dimethylamino" be in parens?
Is it "N,N-Dimethyl-4-pyridinamine"?
Yes There are several names for this compound get IUPAC to give you the 100% correct one! Even than the 4-Dimethylaminopyridine will be the name everybody will have in his head!--Stone 08:08, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming
Talk:Bar billiards

message: Could we get a picture or diagram of the table? -- 14:12, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Never having played the game, I wonder if there's a rule against stalling on coin-operated tables? After all, with a machine-imposed time limit, if I have the advantage in points, all I really need to do is slow down my play in order to extend this advantage considerably. Buck 05:50, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stalling? 

message: I found these images on Flickr and wondered if they'd be of any help in this article? Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 01:34, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: How about a diagram showing the point value of each hole? T71024 (talk) 16:53, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point values?
Talk:Metropolitan-Vickers F.2

message: Should there be a reference for 'nimonic' to the Wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nimonic ? I don't know how to do it and am afraid of messing up the interesting article. Dawright12 (talk) 15:02, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.4.57.101 (talk) 21:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: F.2/2

message: This was a code name but also the name of a secretary at the company 2A00:23C6:F680:2C01:ADCA:1417:790C:605A (talk) 20:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beryl
Talk:2nd Marine Regiment

message: I've added information on additional operations of the 2nd Marines in the Pacific with the privledge of getting the information from a 82 year old veteran of the fighting in the Pacific, Cpl Lee Downey of A Company 1st Battalion, 2nd Marines.  He was there and we wanted that the article to reflect that.  I'll be ordering the unit history put out by the Marine COrps Historical Division, formerly at the Navy Yard in Washington, DC, but now down at Marine Corps Base, Quantico.  SimonATL 06:10, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2nd Marines in World War II

message: I'd propose a new name for this section, as my eyes were brought immediately to it due to its conspiratorial connotations in some cases.  Just for immediate clarity, a name change seems appropriate, although to what, I do not know.   Hkobb7 (talk) 22:25, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New World Order
Talk:Brookwood Village

message: The new office tower is attempting LEED Silver Certification. (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design  WWW.USGBC.ORG)Irving Franks 21:04, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  LEED 
Talk:The Dagger of Kamui

message: Different and first (and better). Unmentioned now, but should have its own article. --HanzoHattori 11:49, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can find no evidence of any manga (outside of the film comics already mentioned). Do you have a source for this? The anime was based on a series of novels. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 17:49, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manga 

message: If no one writes a real article, I guess evebtually I'll do. --Asperchu (talk) 16:36, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Please asume good faith on the part of other editors. Your post here is extremely rude and condescending. The article already mentions the novels on which the anime is based (in the infobox). If you have information regarding a live action film, please post some sources and we'll be glad to update the article accordingly. I haven't been able to locate anything about a live action film, myself. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 17:48, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "already mentions" is not enough, almost everything is about the anime (which is not even a good fILM). The new film (I've seen it already, it's based on the manga version which was once published by Dark Horse, and is very good): http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1156479/ --Asperchu (talk) 17:50, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Dark Horse has never published a "Dagger of Kamui" manga because there is no manga. You may be thinking of The Legend of Kamui, which is completely unrelated to this work. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 18:07, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

text: I should also mention that Viz was the company which released the Legend of Kamui manga, too. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 18:09, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anime is just an offshot, and now there is also a live-action film (not even mentioned!)
Talk:Xena: Warrior Princess (video game)

message: I did a major copyedit today:
* changed from almost all bold
* capitalized names
* added categories
* fixed spelling errors
* added Xena links
Somebody who knows something about Computer/Video games formatting here and/or this game in particular needs to come in and really fix this article.  ~ BigrTex 15:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article needs some clean ups. I've taken some time to go through and correct general grammar and punctuation errors, but I can't rewrite the content because I have no knowledge of the plot line. Someone with knowledge of this article should rewrite it it accordance with the Manual of Style. Noom talk 15:03, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: User:Lee iron maiden freak changed the text on 10-Nov to the following.  It may provide help for someone adding content to this article.  I am reverting to the previous version as it is already wikified.  ~ BigrTex 16:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert
Talk:Rimururu

message: Why did you remove the  template? As this charcter is a video game character, this article falls under the WP:CVG. --日本穣 18:19, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well its a bogus and misleading template. Look at the histories, and you'll see not one member of the project has assisted in the construction of these articles whatsoever (more importantly, they don't partake in active participation either). I requestesd help on the project talkpage only to recieve a blind eye and a deaf ear. Taking that into account, I began the laborous task of creating and expanding all of these articles myself. It's a wiki and there's no policy to dictate a classification of articles belonging to a project. I recommend forebearance and, if specified articles (such as these) become too cluttered with such nonsense, I just quietly remove them with a concensus such as "Removing template not directly related to the project or its members." -ZeroTalk 18:41, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's incorrect. CyberSkull is a member of the project, and s/he has contributed to the article several times. In addition, it's possible that other members of the project were either busy with other pages or unfamiliar with the topic. Keep in mind that there are likely tens of thousands of CVG-related articles on Wikipedia, but there are only so many members of the project. Since you're so passionate about these articles, I recommend you join the project. It seems like one you'd be interested in joining and participating in. --日本穣 19:34, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: CVG Project
Talk:Azumi people

message: Though I can puzzle out that the kanji given could be pronounced as either 'azumi-zoku' or 'agumo', the title of the page (azumi-zoku) is not contained in the article at all. Needs more explanation. LordAmeth 11:53, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked through the previous edits, and the one that changed the "Azumi-zoku" back to "Agumo" gave no explanation, so I reverted it. --日本穣 08:07, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Azumi-zoku vs Agumo 

message: As part of an educational assignment, I've added around 2000 words to the article, an infobox, a navbox and a lot more references. In doing so, I've also removed the stub status. BlackBerryBliss (talk) 04:56, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Stub Status
Talk:Hayato people

message: I just translated most of the Japanese page on this subject as best I could, leaving a few sections that I found dubious or just too challenging. I have unfortunately introduced something of a mess of footnotes and citations and strange fusions of the two, as found in the original Japanese article. Because I have done an imperfect job here, I will note for future reference a few areas that could use correction or expansion:
* There is no image in this article, but recovered probably-Hayato shields do exist and are apparently on display in some museums: a simple image search for 隼人楯 should reveal some. As far as I am aware, no such images are currently available on Commons, but it would be really great if we could get an image of one for this article.
* I skipped a section describing the ceremonial role of the Hayato and their connections with various other families. This could still be translated.
* Formatting is probably somewhat awkward.
* Half of the footnotes probably belong in the main article, some of the footnotes may be ripe for deletion.
Rgkleinhenz (talk) 03:39, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation from Japanese page, 6/20/14
Talk:Koshibito

message: There appear to be zero hits on Google scholar for this word and the three on Google books seem irrelevant.  There is no article for 高志人 on the Japanese wikipedia.  Does this term even exist?  Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 22:15, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Google books gives no hits for "Koshibito" in Frédéric, Louis. Japan encyclopedia.  Page number?  Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 18:32, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that the page number is given in the citation. Try searching for Koshi-bito, with a hyphen. Also, I'm not sure if you read Japanese, but if you do try this Google search which returns 65 results, all non-WP: , plus this one for one of the alternate ways of writing it:  (17 hits). Take for example this page on the linguistic affilitations of the historical peoples of Japan. --ಠ_ಠ node.ue ಠ_ಠ (talk) 21:24, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

text: states "Before the Nara period (710-82), all of northeastern Japan including Tohoku was called Koshi, and its inhabitants were called Koshibito by the Japanese. (Koshibito literally means 'Peope from over the other side')".  This seems inconsistent with the current article.  Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 18:42, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Kumaso

message: Where is the evidence that the Kumaso spoke an Austronesian language? If a relevant citation is not provided within the next seven days, I will remove this claim from the article. Ebizur (talk) 23:07, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No one came forward to offer any evidence in support of the claim that the Kumaso people spoke an Austronesian language, so I have deleted the claim. Ebizur (talk) 04:07, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Claims of Austronesian Linguistic Affiliation
Talk:Mishihase

message: Ixtli 17:57, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Small amount of copy editing.

message: "The name Sushen, which is rendered 肅愼 but pronounced Mishihase or Ashihase in Japanese, can also be found in Japanese documents." -- I am assuming this is supposed to say that it was found in Chinese documents, where it was pronounced Sushen, whereas the Japanese readings of the same compound were Mishihase and Ashihase. But I'm not sure enough to actually change this. Anyone else think this should say "Chinese"? 24.159.255.29 01:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Japanese read the ethnonym 肅愼 as Shukushin (しゅくしん) when it is used in reference to the people that lived to the north of ancient China and who were famous for their payment of arrows as tribute to the Chinese emperor, but the same characters are read as Mishihase/Mishiwase (みしはせ) or Ashihase/Ashiwase (あしはせ) when used in reference to the tribe that invaded the northeastern parts of Japan in the 7th century CE. Whether "Mishihase"/"Mishiwase" or "Ashihase"/"Ashiwase" is the correct reading is a matter of dispute among Japanese scholars. Ebizur 04:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sushen found in Japanese documents, or Chinese? 

message: This should be removed I believe. After reading the stub on the Nivkh People it seems the Nivkh suffered from invading or migrating Tunghu People, thus if the Mishihase/Mishiwase was of the Okhotsk Culture they would have spoken a version of the Nivkh lingustical isolate not a Tungusic language.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.226.138.39 (talk) 21:29, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  They are believed to have spoken a Tungusic language.