lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Maceration (bone)

message: I'm slightly uneasy that someone editing Wikipedia has presumably been spending their spare time macerating dogs.... —Vivacissamamente 00:48, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: : I removed Law Enforcement tag, because it just doesnt seem to fitEMT1871 09:58, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: I think the "the process is quite simple" section should be changed from second person...sounds really weird/a bit unnerving... 24.136.45.122 (talk) 07:31, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Although the article does include instructions for a procedure, I personally consider that the nature of the process is sufficiently unusual and hard to find details on and are sufficiently relevant to understanding the nature of the process, that it is justified. However,I am editing some details, such as reference to biotex as containing perchlorate. I found that quite unlikely and could trace on information to support it. JonRichfield (talk) 15:21, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Active ingerdients
Talk:O'Reilly

message: I have taken out the information that was copied from this website.  It is cited as "an excerpt", but it is in fact the entire text of the page.  There is no evidence that the author of the website (Tim Reilly, I assume) has licensed his work to be used here. ... discospinster talk 00:49, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

message: '...ragh (meaning "race")'—running competition or ethnic group? Presumably not a water conduit. Koro Neil (talk) 21:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Ambiguity

message: See also: Talk:Riley (surname). I see a revert war going on here between editors who want Riley (surname) to be incorporated into this article who want Riley to be a standalone article. Redirecting Riley (surname) to this article without supporting evidence appears on its face to be a violation of WP:Verifiability, which states "The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." Adding the material in Riley (surname) to this article thus would require supporting citations that Riley is always a variation of O'Reilly rather than an English surname of independent origin deserving of its own article. GeoGreg (talk) 17:21, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riley vs. O'Reilly
Talk:Huixtocihuatl

message: Hello,
I am a student tasked with updating the page. I've taken out unreliable sources (blog posts), and added information from primary sources. I also removed the image of a lithograph and replaced it with a primary source image, and added two more images, one of which I uploaded myself from the Florentine Codex. Furthermore, I added information from reliable primary sources and added to the structure of the page.
(Oliviathomas66 (talk) 04:30, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:The Assassination Bureau, Ltd

message: Kind of silly to have a suggestion banner up when there's already a page: The Assassination Bureau.
Corgi 00:51, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Book versus film

message: Long ago I read a version of Bureau that was finished, I thought, by Michael Kurland. —Tamfang (talk) 00:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  multiple finishes?
Talk:Bernardino de Sahagún

message: The level of fawning bias this article has for its subject is absurd and tonally inappropriate. "They organized the natives into utopian communities"? Utopian by whose standards? The "Father of American Ethnography" and a "proto-humanist", when he was a Spanish missionary, whose primary goal was to eventually exterminate Aztec religion and culture, and that was the reason he wrote his works at all? Yes, he produced important works, but the entire context which he produced them, including WHY they're so important due to deliberate destruction of actual Aztec sources, is being presented here tainted with apologia. It's possible to acknowledge his importance and the scope of his works without uncritically repeating what is essentially colonialist propaganda.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.238.231.38 (talk) 10:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incredibly biased article
Talk:Geordie Hormel

message: How is he related to guitarist Smokey Hormel? --googuse 00:56, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Taiyaki

message: This article seems like a joke, the popular culture is larger than the main article itself!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.4.23.101 (talk) 01:14, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You put batter in both halves of the mould; when it firms up you put the filling in
one side and very quickly flip the other half to join. 86.25.244.251 (talk) 22:29, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled 

message: I think this information needs to be in the article, if anyone knows. 71.198.56.105 (talk) 08:44, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is it shaped like a fish? 

message: they are the same. well, in my uneducated eyes they are the same. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 13:35, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge with Bungeoppang? 

message: There is a scene in "Toxic Avenger 2", where Toxie uses a Taiyaki iron on a man's nose, thereby molding it into a fish. I was going to provide a youtube link here in the talk page, just so y'all could see exactly what I was talking about, but I guess that is not allowed, eh? well, I'm sure if you want you can search for "the best scenes" of that movie, and maybe it'll come up around 4:08, if you're lucky. Anyway, maybe this could be mentioned somewhere in the article, under an "In Popular Culture" heading? OwlParty (talk) 02:18, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toxic Avenger 2 

message: I don't think anko is the most common filling anymore. Custard is probably most common now. 124.110.22.245 (talk) 16:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most common filling
Talk:Dying Is Your Latest Fashion

message: I created the Escape The Fate page and after an unpleaseat argument about the notability of the band (mostly caused by my own stubborness and jackassery) I won and the page was idntified as notable. Shouldn't any full length album from a notable band should be considered notable by extension? Avenged Evanfold 18:57, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Radke player additional guitar, keyboard, synthesizer and programming in this album ok
:It needs reliable sources that confirm that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by D33deed33guy (talk • contribs) 17:22, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  HEY!
Talk:Katherine MacDonald

message: I have been researching Katherine MacDonald with the help of a fan's scrapbook I aquired on Ebay.  The scrapbook was filled with clippings and stories which I used to flesh out her bio. I hope to add more details as my research continues.  BTW, sorry I reversed the */ in the comments.  I will get it right next time.
--Hanover81 01:00, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jerry D. Page

message: I think a picture or infobox would push this over the edge to B-class. References need to be cited, however. LordAmeth 18:31, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MILHIST Assessment
Talk:Mictēcacihuātl

message: Is there any difference between the two deities? Both the pages Mictlancihuatl and Mictecacihuatl have the same image and description. Are they not the same deity? If so, why are there two seperate pages? Should these be merged? DiegoAma (talk) 01:10, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference between Mictlancihuatl and Mictecacihuatl
Talk:Kent County League

message: According to this website, it is stated that this league is a level 10 league. But according to the English football league system article, it is a level 11 league. Is there an error? --Siva1979Talk to me 01:05, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Kent County League is in a peculiar situation.  It is classified as a Step 7 league (level 11) because Step 7 best describes the standard of play and standard of grounds in the league (barely anyone has floodlights, I think).  However, in practice it is a level 10 league because there is no Step 6 league that covers Kent.  Faversham Town F.C. promoted from the KCL to the Kent League last season.  As the non-league re-organization continues, a Step 6 league will probably be created to cover Kent, probably through some sort of combination of the Kent League, Combined Counties League and Sussex County League from 3 leagues into 2.  Note that the relationship between the Essex Olympian League and the Essex Senior League is the same as the Kent situation. --Balerion 16:31, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Level 10 of level 11 league?

message: I merged the three division pages in existence, the Premier Division, One East, and One West, into the league page because there really isn't much to do with the division pages other than have a list of members and champions, both of which can be done here. --Balerion 15:39, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Division pages

message: Past winners are listed for Div 3 West but not Div 3 East - did such a division exist.....? ChrisTheDude 12:43, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, there hasn't been a Division 3 East. There was however a Division 4 West, just for one season, 1993-94, won by Maidstone Invicta (now Maidstone United) - fchd (talk) 21:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers Richard! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Divisions
Talk:The Seven Daughters of Eve

message: There is a broken link in ref. nr. 4. It results in this:
:: 404 Not Found
:: The requested URL /wmn/june_2006/wmn_2006_06_27.html does not exist. 
--89.244.123.145 (talk) 22:35, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Link 
Talk:William Mason High School (Mason, Ohio)

message: Victuallers 19:02, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Twice in the last two days I've removed a ridiculous amount of fan stuff from the section on the music departments in this article. Please read the guidelines for school articles here. Continued re-addition of this material without a consensus to do so formed through a reasonable discussion on this page will only result in restricting the editing of this page to experienced registered Wikipedia editors. Please stop and talk. The school does not control this page. John from Idegon (talk) 06:55, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is an encyclopedia article, not a fanpage. 
Talk:No Relations

message: I found :Image:A no-relations.jpeg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:03, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:A no-relations.jpeg]]

message: :Image:A no-relations.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 05:03, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:A no-relations.jpeg
Talk:Jane Tucker

message: This entry says in one section Jane is married to Rod, yet in another says instead she has been in a long term relationship with Freddy! Lets get this corrected!80.41.154.24 (talk) 08:23, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tlālōcān

message: Is this the upperworld? Underworld? Is it a paradise or hell? Is it a paradise for his followers that contains these monsters as well?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.145.251.34 (talk) 15:44, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massive clarification needed 

message: Wait isn't that mural something else?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.201.141.8 (talk) 01:12, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/Medical genetics task force/Participants

message: I have decided to withdraw, and wish you all the best.  I do not have a medical background, so would not likely be able to help much.  And, I am not sure that this is the best fit for Tourette's.  First, the gene(s) have not been identified; second, it involves an interplay between genetic and environmental effects and I'm not sure the genetics should have more weight than the environmental; third, it's a neurological condition and would fit better into a medical category such as neurology or psychiatry which is where most of the experts on TS reside; and fourth, I am not comfortable with a disease/disorder view, in spite of the name of "Tourette's disorder".  I'm just not comfortable that an examination of the genetic elements is the best way to approach an article about Tourette's.  I wish you all the best, and please ping me if I can be of any help in Tourette's or associated conditions.  Sandy 01:41, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there any way the scope of the project can be extended to include the wikipedians who have withdrawn because of the disease/disorder aspect? --apers0n 12:03, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I ask the same. But they should tell us what to change... I'm ready for everything. NCurse work 12:35, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there's anything general.  I saw that Ted withdrew for reasons which seem different than mine.  The gene is identified in Down syndrome:  not in TS.  I just can't figure how to approach TS from a primarily genetic viewpoint, and since I wouldn't be able to contribute much else (as a layperson), it didn't seem like a fit.  I don't think there's any commonality between Ted's withdrawal and mine, since the situation with Down is 100% genetic; whereas with TS, it's only a genetic predisposition.  If there's anything I can help you all with, please let me know !  Sandy 21:07, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Projects are designed to get together like-minded individuals with an interest in improving a common set of articles of interest to the group.  Define yourselves.  Don't be defined by people who have decided, for whatever reason, to leave the project. TedTalk/Contributions 20:00, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sorry to withdraw
Talk:List of Freaks and Geeks episodes

message: What happened to the episode with production code 113? Is the information wrong? Or is something else going on?
--84.104.40.230 (talk) 15:45, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Are we certain that the episode order on the DVD is the intended story sequence? Several episodes are out of production order, and I know Judd Apatow has admitted that the episode order on the Undeclared DVD set is screwed up (I read the quote before I got into F&G, so don't remember if he referred to both). I know it's entirely possible episodes were produced out of sequence with the intention of being broadcast otherwise (guest star availability, location availability, etc...), but some of these are wildly out of production sequence (eg: 10 before 6, 13 after 17). Aoystreck (talk) 08:59, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The DVD is in the correct order, it was just the Undeclared DVD where the order is incorrect. Episode 110 "Carded and Discarded" was shot as the "second pilot" which aired first when the show returned in January, and was made to not interrupt the flow of the episode beforehand and after. Episode 113 "Discos and Dragons" (the finale) was shot when they knew they were canceled, so they could have a proper finale. All this information comes from the DVD booklet and the commentary tracks. Drovethrughosts (talk) 14:20, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Production 113

message: wtf is the * for next to some of the us air dates?IAmTheCoinMan (talk) 03:09, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: dgfdfg
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Banksia/Assessment

message: I wonder if we could establish some guidelines for the importance rating. The crux of the importance assessment, as I understand it, is this: If we decided to produce a print or CD edition of Banksia articles, how important would it be for the article to be included?
Based on that:
* Banksia is obviously "top".
* I previously rated all the species articles as "mid", but I regret that. I now think all the species articles should be at least "high", because it would be a pretty crappy print edition that didn't include all the species. Well known iconic species should be "top".
* The subgenus, section and series articles probably should be "mid" importance, as one can easily imagine producing a good print edition that didn't include them. One could make a case for Banksia subg. Isostylis, to be "high", but that's about it.
* Related taxa should be low, except Dryandra, which should be at least mid, since there is a chance of it being rolled into Banksia
Below is a draft table of importance guidelines. Can we edit up a consensus? Snottygobble 01:47, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Guidelines for importance rating
Talk:Medusa (Clan of Xymox album)

message: All composition credits are sourced directly from the Performing Rights Society (PRS for Music).
Raymond80s (talk) 14:44, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Track listing
Talk:Kan (river)

message: Quite a bit of the Russian article untranslated, but this is all I intend to translate.  I'm working on a related article, and did this to make the links link. So anyone whose Russian is up to it is welcome to finish the translation. 
Добро пожаловать! Williamborg 01:54, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial Entry

message: The German article shows a different length for the river. I've left it with the Russian version (they should know their rivers). If anyone has a great reference, they might resolve. Williamborg 01:59, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: German Wiki does not agree with Russian Wiki

message: kan river also is a river in the tehran--ایلیا 2010 (talk) 15:03, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tehran
Talk:Fyodor Pirotsky

message: ++Lar: t/c 01:55, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

message: He is Ukrainian, but not Russian - look in Russian wikipedia!--Шиманський Василь (talk) 17:26, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Ukrainian
Talk:P57 (glycoside)

message: ++Lar: t/c 01:55, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

message: The article Bushmen#Hoodia traditional knowledge agreement states that P57 has not yet been marketed, but surely that's no longer true?  Is P57 not the hoodia ingredient one hears about in appetite suppressant products?  Would someone familiar please respond, and ideally update both that and this article to note if there are now products featuring this ingredient?  Thanks, Abrazame (talk) 07:39, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this still in development phase or is it currently marketed and used in products?
Talk:Armenians in Bulgaria

message: ++Lar: t/c 01:55, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a sentence about him and his relations with Bulgaria. Todor→Bozhinov 14:00, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

message: No notice was placed here that this image has been nominated for deletion. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 23:04, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Other images used on this page may also have been nominated -- please check them all by clicking on them to see if there is a deletion notification on the image page.  If there is, use the link that takes you to "this image's entry" to comment on the nomination for deletion. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 01:04, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image nominated for deletion
Talk:John Howarth (cricketer)

message: ++Lar: t/c 01:55, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

message: The part about Howarth's possible bad record is talked about in paragraph 1, then twice in paragraph two, then again in paragraph four.  This seems a bit of overkill.
Wanderer57 (talk) 21:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repetitive article
Talk:SS Rajputana

message: ++Lar: t/c 01:55, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

message: I have removed the reference to Kalchuri, Meher Prabhu. For discussion, see RS/N and this Talk page. Simon Kidd (talk) 13:57, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I linked to two pages. Fifelfoo said on his Talk page: "I'd suggest editing out OR and inappropriately sourced content, citing policy and appropriate discussions, and discussing at length on the talk page." The relevant policy/guideline says that an article "must be based upon reliable third-party sources, and meets this requirement if [among other things, it] is independent and unaffiliated with the subject, thus excluding sources such as self-published material by the subject, autobiographies, and promotional materials". Kalchuri fails this test, since he is published by an organisation affiliated with the subject. Simon Kidd (talk) 22:58, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of devotee-published sources
Talk:Lake Washington (New York)

message: ++Lar: t/c 01:55, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Can someone explain how though the dam was built in 1907 the lake was supplying water to Newburgh since 1852?
:It was a natural lake that was expanded. The article now reflects this. Daniel Case 04:41, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled