lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Wesleyan Quadrilateral

message: Can we lose the ALL CAPS STATEMENTS? Yes, we can. And lo, they were no more. - Happydog 22:38, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I remember my days at Canadian Theological Seminary when I was introduced to this marvelous concept by our Systematic Theology instructor. After thinking about it, and having studied great minds like  Blaise Pascal and Lancelot Hogben, I saw this idea of Wesley not in two dimensions but three. When you consider Scripture as the rule that rules, over the other three, the rule that is ruled, you get a tetrahedron rather than a mere quadrilateral. All I need here is a way to post it. Any tips?
R3hall 20:52, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:   A 3D perspective 

message: The quadrilateral is a good "system" for working through your own faith and theology. However, for me there are two parts missing. Yes scripture is primary, for that is where we begin our journey with God. From scripture we work through building our own faith understanding by her "level") with scripture.....and on and on in our journey toward God and ultimately true understanding. I think Wesley would call it moving on to perfection. But I guess we never quite get there! Least I have not.....yet! guatdoc (talk) 13:27, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the quadrilateral lacks. 

message: The second paragraph of the description has no reference. I would suggest 
Klfkyle (talk) 21:08, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional reference in description 

message: The phrase "Christian" experience is odd. I've never heard that term explicitly or seen it discussed in any detail. Even the rest of the article lacks the phrase "Christian experience." If it's simply a wording issue, I would like to remove it, unless someone has a reason for it to be there. Thanks. Ollie Garkey (talk) 17:49, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Christian experience" 

message: This article lacks critical perspectives against the quadrilateral ; for instance what about Christian’s who believe in sola scriptura they excludes reason or experience or the Holy Spirit ? That should be included for a comprehensive review 202.7.248.97 (talk) 15:00, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical views
Talk:Rex Hunt

message: I can't seem to find Rex Hunts IMDB entry, could someone please post that here so we can make a link to it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.155.175.211 (talk • contribs) 
:It doesn't exist, which is a shame because he has appeared in a number of fishing and football-related shows on Channel Seven. Rogerthat Talk 08:11, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It exists now. It's a very basic entry though. See http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2401933/. -- Longhair\talk 10:37, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: IMDB

message: I'm sure I saw it mentioned in this article, but it is gone.  You'd think something so controversial would be mentioned here.  --Spewmaster 01:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to the Leon Davis "Black as a Dog" radio commentating incident
Talk:Colin Atkinson

message: I was amazed to see that there is no Who's Who entry for Colin Atkinson - which would have been helpful. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 14:05, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: No Who's Who entry

message: The article as a whole is clearly more than a stub, so I've destubbed it, but the cricket section is badly in need of expansion, so I've flagged it for attention. The importance rating is purely for his cricket - taking his life as a whole he would clearly merit a higher rating. JH (talk page) 20:13, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment on WP Cricket rating
Talk:Just the Two of Us (TV series)

message: I suggest we move each pair to the bottom of the table as they get eliminated.
HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 14:13, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion 

message: I suggest that the whole page needs a makeover. There is no need now it has gone into a second series to have the individual points scores from each judge. And the judge's section should be moved above each series section. Wish i just had time to update it. Timclare 22:04, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Layout

message: I thought Just the Two of Us was a song! >: (  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.33.24.135 (talk) 10:35, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I thought... 
Talk:Australia at the 2002 Winter Olympics

message: The BBC noted that Australia was ahead of Austria, and quotes Camplin as saying that she sometimes gets described as coming from Austria. The editor who has been deleting this also made this deletion twice (with no discussion in the talk page) in the Steven Bradbury article, in spite of the details given. Andjam 14:14, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Austria vs Australia 

message: Go much at the games you lay today I hope you a winner. 73.226.55.150 (talk) 01:21, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Juju
Talk:American Birkebeiner

message: An anonymous IP changed the number of skiers from 5000 to 7000. Can a citation be made for the number of skiers? Thanks, Andjam 14:18, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of skiers 

message: It was Håkon Håkonsson that was smuggled. Also, the race is from Rena to Lillehammer. 81.191.253.114 (talk) 09:46, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracies in history section
Talk:North American blizzard of 2005

message: Needs a satellite picture. Cyclone1 14:19, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: Essex County lists salem with both 38 and 27 inches of snow.  Is it possible to reconcile these?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.112.236.226 (talk) 03:51, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting totals
Talk:Dark Fall

message: I think this article should be merged with Dark Fall because that was the original title plus, there is some more info. there. 131.202.134.114 14:25, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I merged the article Dark Fall: The Journal with Dark Fall. I think it is much better now, what do you think? 131.202.134.114 14:51, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging 

message: Thanks for keeping some of my orginal writing Zerath13 05:11, 25 February 2006
:(Same person, just at a different computer) Yeah, it is a lot bigger now. You're welcome, your writing was important for the article. 131.202.138.213 12:50, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  thanks  
Talk:Mathematical table

message: I removed "Since the cost per megabyte of
memory is at present falling at a faster rate than is the cost per unit of CPU performance,
one would expect the use of lookup tables to be increasing, in a space-for-time
tradeoff." That sounds reasonable, but it probably isn't true. Computer memory has been cheap enough to allow such optimization for a long time. We used tables to speed up trig functions in robot controllers 25 years ago, when memory cost over 100,000 times as much per meg as it does in 2006.  Today it's quite likely no one bothers to do that in similar applications because inexpensive CPUs are fast enough to keep up with whatever calculations are needed using standard libraries. --agr 14:26, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Time-space trade off

message: Since there is a separate article on the Multiplication table, do we need to include it here. A trig or log table would be a better example.--agr 03:13, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiplication table?

message: "This was motivated mainly by errors in logarithmic tables made by the human 'computers' of the time."
It seems weird to put computers in quotes when this is the original sense of the word. Like it's suggesting that these are so-called computers. ᛭ LokiClock (talk) 12:52, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Computers'
Talk:Dark Fall: The Journal

message: I think this article should be merged with Dark Fall because that was the original title plus, there is some more info. there. 131.202.134.114 14:26, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging? 

message: I merged the article Dark Fall: The Journal with Dark Fall. I think it is much better now, what do you think? 131.202.134.114 14:52, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging
Talk:Tunis–Carthage International Airport

message: Can you please use the pictures found on:
http://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%85%D8%B7%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%AA%D9%88%D9%86%D8%B3_%D9%82%D8%B1%D8%B7%D8%A7%D8%AC_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AF%D9%88%D9%84%D9%8A
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/A%C3%A9roport_international_de_Tunis-Carthage
we can put the picture of the main terminal, not Terminal II's in the top of the page, and a gallery in the bottom  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.0.214.90 (talk) 11:50, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 
Talk:Vlastimil Pták

message: Ptak appears to be fairly notable, given more than a few articles I spied on MathSciNet which celebrate a birthday of his or commemorate his death.  Some of these articles mention his accomplishments, of which there appear to be a number scattered across different fields.  I did the best I could on little time, citing some papers that appear to be heavily referenced.  But things can definitely be improved as far as contents; since I'm not familiar with these areas, someone more familiar may want to pick other or better selected publications.  --C S (Talk) 14:42, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:David Barrett (prosecutor)

message: This article has a conservative bias and should be flagged as such.
ROFLMAO!  Perhaps a few words like "Clintonista" could be removed but would you care to go through the thousands of articles with a liberal bias and so flag them?  I love Wikipedia for the hard sciences and for OLD history, but it's frankly useless in the political zone. BipolarBear 21:35, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article had zero biographical content, so I moved it (in both of its oppositely-skewed versions) to the new Henry Cisneros payments controversy article.  Wasted Time R 17:00, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article was a stub in June 2009]. It was then edited by an editor who made 16 edits on 3 December 2009, making no editors before or after that date and no edits to any other article.
One of the edits carried the edit summary:
(I pulled this information from a Biography supplied by Mr. Barrett)
While we do not know for sure whether the source was this site or something else, there is no evidence that the source was properly licensed.
There have been a handful of edits subsequent to the 2009 edits, but they were not substantive. Therefore, I am reverting to the earlier version.--S Philbrick(Talk) 22:00, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright review.
Talk:Polish Victory Lap

message: Any relationship between a Polish Victory Lap and Reverse Polish Notation as far as where the name came from? Caerwine Caerwhine 20:21, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately it was meant as a bad ethnic joke about Polish people. The comment by the official was more on the line of "Polish people don't know how to drive in the correct direction". Reverse Polish Notation is a math/science arithmetic display system. I know Kulwicki, being an engineer, probably would know about the notation, but he didn't name the lap! Royalbroil 04:22, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverse Polish Notation 

message: Should it be mentioned specifically that Kulwicki was of Polish ancestry? As Caerine's comment indicated, there's a little more to the story than people may be aware of. -Freekee (talk) 03:38, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added that Kulwicki was Polish American to the article. Royalbroil 04:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That helps, but it still doesn't explain the "Polish joke" aspect of the name. I can't think of a decent way to work that in, though. -Freekee (talk) 17:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why Polish
Talk:History of Oklahoma City

message: Sandtown, Oklahoma was an independent community and then a part of Oklahoma City for nearly 120 years.  Today it is largely forgotten even though decedents of the original settlers still live there.  I would like to add the link: www.sandtownhistory.com to the History of Oklahoma City page.  Not sure how this is done.
Ron Webb
ronwebb888@hotmail.com
Although Mr. Webb's excellent paper is no longer available at the link shown above, it is available at http://dougdawg.blogspot.com/2013/02/sandtown-circa-1884.html,http://dougdawg.blogspot.com/2013/02/sandtown-circa-1884.html as is more information about Sandtown, Oklahoma City.
Doug Loudenback (talk) 22:02, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sandtown, Oklahoma 

message: I read that the Hooverville in Oklahoma City was 64,000 acres, is that possible?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.94.164.181 (talk) 17:33, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 100 square miles

message: What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content. Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 09:38, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Timeline of Oklahoma City]] 
Talk:GM 5L40-E transmission

message: From 2001-2005 (at least), BMW used the GM 5L40-E in the 5-series.  So the 2004+ production timeframe is obviously incorrect.  I would correct it, but I don't see any value in replacing incorrect information with other incorrect information, so until we can find something for sure, I am noting it here. Lord Bodak 14:58, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:NHS (disambiguation)

message: The claimed reversion of vandalism by user:72.56.118.28 was no such thing, and I take a very dim view of it being called such; see here for the discussion.
To cut a long story short, those schools don't belong in the list for the usual reasons.
Fourohfour 15:27, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alleged vandalism

message: I find it somewhat absurd that the acronym NHS, which is known worldwide as the acronym of the British National Health Service (which is also Europe's largest employer) should stand alongside the abbreviation of a motley collectiom of schools and other entities using the term NHS.
In most other articles where one term usage grossly outweighs other usages the abbreviation directs to the most likely usage with a reference to a disambiguation page if the reader finds that he or she has been directed to something unexpected.
I thus propose that this page be retitled NHS (disambiguation) and a cross link back put on the National Health Service page to the disambiguation page.--Hauskalainen (talk) 00:32, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed! Fishiehelper2 (talk) 10:27, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I also agree, there is no way that the NHS should not redirect to the National Health Service which is employs the 3rd most people in the world after the Chinese army and Indian railways. Mspence835 (talk) 19:49, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems sensible to me, I suspect most people searching for NHS would be looking for the National Health Service or some form of it. Add a hat note to the National Health Service Page and the existing hat note will need to be changed to explicitly include NHS Scotland and NHS Wales and possibly the department of Health and Social Care in Northern Ireland and the Canadian group of hospitals.--wintonian talk 11:09, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal: NHS should redirect to National Health Service and this page renamed NHS (disambiguation)
Talk:Jūnihitoe

message: I think that there is a kind of mistake in the kanji.
*衣's on'yumi can be "e" but 単's kun'yomi is "hitoe" and no "hito" variation is specified.
*The actual 十二単衣 doesn't appear a single time on the Japanese jûnihitoe page.　My IME doesn't propose it as kanjis for じゅうにひとえ and only converts it to 十二単.
But there is some occurrence on a Google search so it might be a rare but acceptable variation.
*十二単衣: 17 500 results
*十二単: 175 000 results
The mistake could have been missing to notice the standard before the rarer variation.
Lacrymocéphale 23:25, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kanji spelling 
Talk:Oplan HACKLE

message: Most of this page is a straight copy from the first external link.
Given the fact that this is only an "alleged" plot (and alleged by the Phillipines Armed Forces, who are hardly an impartial source), couldn't this be merged into 2006 Philippines coup? FiggyBee 15:29, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Expect that the Oplan HACKLE would be unveiled sooner as long as the Armed Forces of the Philippines gathers enough information about this operation. Maybe, Oplan HACKLE might not only affect the February coup, but also the events in the future ahead. Thank you for your concern. Darth Narutorious 17:51, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Redemption Songs

message: Added a copyvio tag after details of singles were added, which appeared to be taken from http://www.jarchives.com/jartifacts50.htm --OscarTheCattalk 15:31, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:John Herivel

message: Good job. Very clear and easy to follow, for a complicated subject. --Rbraunwa 15:15, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the comments and taking the time to review. — Matt Crypto 19:55, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

text: There are deficiencies, but what you say is not quite right. Re-reading Herivel's book:  shows that he section needs improving. The daily settings included selection of the rotors, which were changed each day without repetition of rotor and position - so there were only 32, not 60 options for the code breakers, a fact discovered by Nigel Foreman. The ring setting (ringstellung) was the setting for each rotor of the letter (or number) against which the notch for advancing the next wheel was to be positioned, not the letters that were to appear in the windows. Herivel's brilliant insight was to realize that lazy or stressed operators might not rotate the rotors more than one position forwards or back after closing the lid, leaving the letters on display as close to the ring settings, and then use that as the indicator for the first message of the day. I will change the text when time permits unless it has already been done. --TedColes (talk) 13:16, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. Whilst it is fairly well-referenced and meets many of the Good article criteria, the focus and coverage of the article is more problematic. A very large portion of the text (in fact the majority) is not about the article subject himself, and were this to be removed there would be scant content remaining. For this reason I have listed the article at Good article reassessment, where its status will be debated by GA reviewers and other interested editors. Please feel free to contribute to this process by commenting in the appropriate section on the GAR page. Regards, EyeSereneTALK 13:21, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As a result of a lengthy discussion at good article reassessment, it was decided by consensus to delist this article.  It should be noted that several suggestions for meeting the good article criteria, including some as simple as renaming the article, were discussed and suggested.  For a full archive of the dicussion in question, see Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 33. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 07:17, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA sweep: article listed at [[WP:GAR|Good article reassessment]]
Talk:Deutsches Institut für Normung

message: The DIN standard that brought me here, and is probably the most familiar to Americans, is for in-dash car stereo head units. Yet I don't see this example mentioned? Redneb 15:42, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree; as a "run of the mill" American, I have never heard DIN used for anything other than "in-dash car stereo head units".
Carl  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.116.39.67 (talk) 16:26, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Was it really 1975?
My dad had an old zeiss camera  Kontaflex from the 60's..
I recall the film speeds were marked in DIN, we needed
a little chart to convert ASA to DIN film speed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.51.236.225 (talk) 00:57, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You might find DIN film speed helpful. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 00:09, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  DIN creation date.
Template talk:Medicine

message: I am proposing a split between this template and Template:Medical specialities. Template:Medicine should provide a high-quality broad overview of the extremely broad area of medicine. Instead it is currently a placeholder for medical specialties plus a minor amount of additional links. LT90001 (talk) 22:02, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed split 

message: Ophthalmology should fall under surgical subspecialties. Eye surgery is not considered a field of medicine. Ophthalmology is and it is considered a surgical subspecialty. Please see
https://www.facs.org/education/resources/residency-search/specialties 68.12.31.254 (talk) 04:07, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: . Eye surgery is already under the "surgery" category. Correct me if I'm wrong, but ophthalmology seems to include non-surgery practice as well. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 06:53, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 July 2020 

message: I suggest that the Medical Toxicology speciality be added in the "Other" section of this template (with the given link). Kraemer (talk) 23:40, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. Please post a notification at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine to indicate your proposal. Regards,  Goldsztajn (talk) 23:48, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 October 2020
Talk:Equivalent average

message: I was very confused by the wording of the sentences: "For instance, the Pacific Coast League is a minor league known to be a very friendly venue for hitters. Therefore, a hitter in the PCL may have notably depressed raw statistics (a lower batting average, fewer home runs, etc.) if he were hitting in another league at the same level."
It's relevant information but it is worded in a bad way. It could use a citation too
--The big donk (talk) 00:44, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  worded confusingly
Talk:Slutsk

message: Is Slutsk still "predominantly Jewish" as the article said?  Some possibly-not-reliable information I recieved from a resident of Slutsk would indicate that during the Nazi occupation during WW2 that became otherwise. Trying to find information I came across this bizzare article in the Russian newspaper eXile. It oddly mirrors the discussion I had with a classmate.  Does anyone know if this is still the case? -- RevAaron
:Someone I know from Minsk who has done research in Slutsk states that there are currently (as of 2008) fewer than 100 Jews in the town.  Of course, one could need a citable source to include that in the article. -- kosboot (talk) 12:50, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I also believe that, as of the now-lost 1897 census, there were somewhat over 14,000 Jews and about 10,000 non-Jews in the town. I have to find where I saw that citation. -- kosboot (talk) 15:01, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Cat's languages

message: ok, I'll list some problems with this page.  First off it has no sources.  I would guess that most of this is original research.  It does not have an encyclopedic tone, and uses personal pronouns.  The title does not seem to have anything to do with the content of the page.  This would be appropriate for a column on common cat behavior for pet owners, however, I can't see how this belongs in wikipedia.  It's also POV i.e. "Unless you abuse your cat, at which point you should burn in hell."  Ziiv 16:10, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well noted.  I think we should consider listing it for deletion, as I don't really think there is much information worth merging.CharacterZero 06:48, 26 March 2006 (UTC)