Talk:Tees Valley

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Tees Valley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060715060843/http://www.teesvalley-jsu.gov.uk/tvsp/STRUCTURE%20PLAN.pdf to http://www.teesvalley-jsu.gov.uk/tvsp/STRUCTURE%20PLAN.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:53, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: One of the most obvious things about the Tees Valley area that we dont cover is that it isn't a valley. Should we? -Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 10:51, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valley? 

message: A lot of the "History" section was moved from Teesside by User:Chocolateediter. It's left that article very scant, and this article confused. I think it would be more appropriate for these changes to be reverted, as Teesside is the actual area (as opposed to "Tees Valley", a recent grouping of councils for local government convenience). To keep a better division of things, it might be better to only touch on the history of local government (not general history) in this article.
Also, a lot of it can be delegated in the form :Template:See also or :Template:Main article to Cleveland, England, which more comprehensively discusses the history of local government in this area of the country. --Inops (talk) 11:57, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't agree. Teesside has never been a political area, nor was Cleveland before the 1974 county (it's a traditional [and ill-defined] division of the North Riding). The history should go where it's most relevant, and that's at Teesside and Cleveland, England. I feel like it would be cleanest to just revert. --Inops (talk) 12:19, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

text: I don't understand the point you're trying to make here. It seems like your own interpretation of things, which would be WP:Original Research. Also what is "1st Cleveland" and "1st Teesside" etc? I see you've used those kinds of descriptions as section headers in Teesside. --Inops (talk) 20:05, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

text: I have to agree that we are getting very confused here and a revert may be in order to restore some semblance of order. I have reverted changed to Cleveland (UK Parliament constituency) which implies a recreation but there does not appear to be any such thing. I have also reverted change to point County of Cleveland redirect to Teesside as that appear to be incorrect and should be Cleveland, England. Keith D (talk) 19:40, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been speculating to myself where everybody lives. ha. -Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 19:45, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent changes to this article and the [[Teesside]] article 

message: This article has a lot of overlap with the Tees Valley Combined Authority article. Other Combined Authority articles do not distinguish the Combined Authority from the Combined Authority area in this way. Either the articles should be merged or the information belonging specifically to the Combined Authority (ie. The Tees Valley website link in the infobox) should be moved to Tees Valley Combined Authority.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark63424 (talk • contribs) 14:46, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Tees Valley Combined Authority?