lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1 vs. 100 (Philippine game show)

message: These past few days, anons have been separating a money tree from the gameplay section and giving it some color. It is already stated that the gameplay section should not be split. How can we remedy this because requestion protection of this page will not work (or will only lead to edit wars). - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 02:43, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried that option, but so far, no luck. Their reason for declining the request for semi-protection is the changes only occur once a day. It's not even rampant to admin standards. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 16:59, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure 

message: I agree with you. It seems this IP address who keeps changing the gameplay. Even how many times that we will undid, this will keep changing and changing until it is semi-protected.Dehm46 12:04, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried that option, but so far, no luck. Their reason for declining the request for semi-protection is the changes only occur once a day. It's not even rampant to admin standards. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 16:59, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing Gameplay 

message: Can somebody tell me what's "Lagarista" in English. Dehm46 16:20, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just found out that a lagarista is a courier who brings reels of film between movie houses. But just list Telmo as a KDOND winner. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 16:35, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lagarista?
Talk:Tarcoola, South Australia

message: Can anyone clarify if the passenger trains stop at Tarcoola, and if so, are passengers allowed to get on and off?  Tarcoola is not listed as a ticket destination on the GSR bookings website.   (Nearby Pimba IS a destination.) Thanks.   Ubuntu2 (talk) 06:16, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a functioning railway station, and it should be possible to buy a ticket - see Tarcoola railway station. However, the town has no permanent resident population, so demand would be very limited. Peter Bell (talk) 10:51, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: The Ghan and Indian Pacific
Talk:Mannix College (Monash University)

message: I believe that this article does not pass WP:ORG, therefore any appropriate content should be moved to Monash University (keeping in mind that there are currently zero statements in the article which are supported by verified third-party sources...) 1292simon (talk) 06:58, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Monash University
Talk:Le Petit Sénégal

message: Okay, I know we want better pictures here, and we're working on it. We want beautiful African women wearing traditional clothing shopping and men on folding chairs discussing politics in French and Wolof. We'll get there. This was about 2pm on a Saturday afternoon.
--Knulclunk 05:11, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: Hi folks,  I was just up there this afternoon, and there's really nothing in the block between St.Nicholas and Morningside except apartment buildings and a bodega.  The two blocks of 116th running east from Adam Clayton Powell Jr. (where the photo was taken) are a much better location, and it continues to grow North up ACPjr.  I'm not sure how to ref this.  The Phone Book?  Also July 25th is the Mouride celebration on 116th street.  NYC area Wikipedian's (such as myself) may want to visit with a camera. T L Miles (talk) 20:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Opportunity for photos & location
Talk:Deakin Business School

message: I've tried to fix the reference link. Does anybody know why it doesn't work?Jaker5 (talk) 01:51, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Melbourne University Private

message: Why is this not part of the main article on the University of Melbourne?  Why is there no reference to this article in the University of Melbourne article?192.38.117.2 (talk) 11:46, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

message: I think the verifiable portions of the article (it was opened by University of Melbourne as a for-profit school, it didn't make money, it closed) could be a nice succinct subsection in University of Melbourne#History. I reorganized what was already there, but I suspect much of it is original research/synthesis. Schazjmd (talk) 00:59, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Beijing Pop Festival

message: Should this page be updated to reflect that it hasn't happened every year? I think that it hasn't occurred for a few years, but I haven't seen any sources about it. I suspect that it hasn't happened for several years, as I lived in the area and never heard about it. A cursory Google search shows the most recent news articles about Beijing Pop Festival are from 2007. NeoChrono Ryu (talk) 02:55, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Every year?
Talk:Chaoyang Park

message: Is it actually in Chaoyang District, Beijing? Badagnani 03:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes! Chaoyang District is huge, occupies much of the East of the city craigTheBrit (talk) 13:44, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I added the appropriate category. ---Another Believer (Talk) 08:20, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Which district is it in?

message: Please discuss page moves in the future before moving pages. What is the evidence that "Beijing" is part of this park's English name? Badagnani (talk) 17:03, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undiscussed page move 

message: I propose that this phrasing should be clarified. Part of Chaoyang park used to be a palace, but not the whole thing. The current phrasing seems quite ambiguous, and I'd like to to be clear that not all of what is now Chaoyang Park was a palace.
Can we get any source or citation for this claim? A cursory look at this Baidu Baike article implies that the palace was located elsewhere, and was rebuilt at it's current location in the late 20th century.
Additionally, can we add in which prince it was, or what the name of the palace was? Is this referring to the 郡王府, in the southeastern section of Chaoyang Park? NeoChrono Ryu (talk) 02:48, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "a park located on the site of the former Prince's Palace"?
Talk:Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091027114704/https://www.monash.edu.au/news/monashmemo/stories/20090408/regenerative.html to http://www.monash.edu.au/news/monashmemo/stories/20090408/regenerative.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090623161914/http://www.legislation.vic.gov.au:80/domino/Web_Notes/newmedia.nsf/798c8b072d117a01ca256c8c0019bb01/773344f4c4f794baca25714e0005c518!OpenDocument to http://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/domino/Web_Notes/newmedia.nsf/798c8b072d117a01ca256c8c0019bb01/773344f4c4f794baca25714e0005c518!OpenDocument
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100314163404/https://www.armi.org.au:80/Facilities/FishCore.aspx to http://www.armi.org.au/Facilities/FishCore.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070829142111/https://www.biotechnews.com.au/index.php/id;518388003;fp;4;fpid;1010 to http://www.biotechnews.com.au/index.php/id;518388003;fp;4;fpid;1010
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 The third of these did not work, the rest are fine. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 03:03, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Academic dress of University of Melbourne

message: "Masters may wear the mortar board, however undergraduate students and Bachelors are not permitted to wear the mortar board, following the Oxford style."
This sentence is wrong. In Oxford anyone is allowed to wear a square, it's just that men don't when indoors as is traditional practice. This has lead to the confusion that certain Oxonians _can't_ wear one when they can but _won't_. --Charlie Huang 【遯卋山人】 14:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mortarboards 
Talk:James River High School (Chesterfield County, Virginia)

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 21:24, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Epyllion

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 03:26, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article was formerly basically a dictionary entry which was transwikied to wiktionary. I'm now writing it up as a literary historico-critical article, hence my writing over the redirect.  davidiad.: 17:23, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-09-16 Automated pywikipediabot message
Talk:Off the grid

message: Removing politicsoffthegrid.com entry, which read: 
*Off the Grid (blog) http://www.politicsoffthegrid.wordpress.com], Political humor, News, Local happenings...and a little bit of fun here and there."
as it seems to be not appropriate for wikipedia (e.g. I find no mainstream news articles about it), and it's already disambiguated by its full title. Entries like "Warren Miller's Off the Grid" and "Off the Grid with Les Stroud" are also disambiguated by their full title, but there are several mainstream news articles on both that refer to them as simply "Off the Grid." -Agyle 03:31, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing politicsoffthegrid.com 

message: I think the phrase "off the grid" is more commonly associated with going into hiding than with living without dependence on public utilities; "the grid" in this case being various electronic infrastructures that could facilitate determination of one's location.  For example, a person could be found through evidence left by telephone calls, use of a credit card, or simply standing in view of a surveillance camera; and in going "off the grid" would discontinue such activities to avoid discovery.
Is there an existing Wikipedia article to which this one could link, for this sense of the phrase? B7T (talk) 17:13, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: We have many articles which relate tangentially to this idea. i have added some of them, though thats not strictly what a disambig page is used for. i also linked to wiktionary, which has a definition inclusive of this idea.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electronic communications as "the grid"
Talk:Dapol

message: I have removed the banners and tried to address the issues raised. I shall shortly also get an illustration in. This article can certainly be improved more but it is important we retain it, especially as I think, please tell me, there is no article on the Mainline Railways brand?Robertforsythe (talk) 11:18, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banners
Talk:Integer BASIC

message: If i'm not mistaken, the Apple I did not have a BASIC in ROM.  Its ROM only had a very primitive system monitor, which allowed hexadecimal entry, and (maybe) cassette input.  BASIC had to be hacked in or loaded from tape.—überRegenbogen 03:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apple I ROM 

message: Hello Wikipedia! I want to upload an image, but I do not have permission to do this. Can I send this picture to an admin/confirmed user? 
Thanks!
AlexandruT (talk) 19:30, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uploading Image 

message: Under "reserved words" I feel like Apple Basic and Integer BASIC are backwards. Didn't integer BASIC come first, then they added more commands with Apple BASIC?208.66.148.83 (talk) 19:17, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this section backwards?
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Lodging

message: "Articles" like Lodging just make Wikipedia look silly. It's astounding that so many edits have been made on it, and that there was any question about whether it should be deleted. Let's get serious, people. If you don't know what to write about or work on, there are lists of projects looking for editors. -Eric (talk) 03:42, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not up to any one person to decide if any article is silly or worthless just because it doesn't interest them or doesn't move their gauge of relevance. It's all a question of perspective. Some people say Wikipedia as a whole is silly, to paraphrase "any encyclopaedia anyone can edit? That's just silly". To use your rationale, why are you wasting time making an edit like this when there's lists of projects looking for editors? ---- WebHamster 04:19, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Touché on the waste of time--I just sometimes get overcome by a wave of optimism that I might get people to realize that this is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. My comment has nothing to do with my personal interest in the concept of lodging; in fact, I'm quite a seasoned lodger. I am not deciding that the article is silly, and don't mean to rile people with my above comment, which I now see does come across a bit provocative. The word "lodging" very simply does not merit an encyclopedia entry--this is not an opinion, but a reflection of my understanding of what an encyclopedia is. Here's the opinion part: I think Wikipedia is a great project that is becoming a great resource. I promote it and wish I had more time to work on it. However it often appears to me that many of its editors have never opened an encyclopedia and comprehended the difference between it and a dictionary; if they did, Wikipedia would improve faster. -Eric (talk) 15:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I actually agree with your feelings and am similarly someone who promotes WP at every opportunity. The problem arises that WP ceased to become a pure encyclopaedia a long while ago. Now it's also a combination of Allmusic, IMDb, Gamers World and all manner of other things. You are perfectly correct in that it's not a dictionary but when the inmates are allowed to be in charge of the madhouse then that madhouse can turn into lots of things it was never intended for :). Personally I think fighting against the tide by public proclamation is an exercise in futility unfortunately. ---- WebHamster 15:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right on that. I look forward to the day I will learn to just smile and try to set a good example instead of pursuing lost causes via tirade! -Eric (talk) 16:31, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What won't we have "articles" about?
Talk:Allen's Coffee Brandy

message: Despite appearances, this article represents an anthropological reality.  I speak for a genration of Mainers on this point.Atrata 03:51, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The accuracy of the above is absolute.  The importance of coffee brandy to Mainers cannot possibly be overstated. Popecrunch (talk) 17:22, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dicoronylene

message: Everything I added, the history, occurence, etc. are all detailed with the original cited literature in the book that is referenced. I can add all of those if that would be useful.
This compound has been studied quite a lot for a large PAH, which I thought it should have its own article. Astrophysicists have been especially interested in it.
Fetz the chemist 03:58, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: It is not possible to draw a resonance structure of dicoronylene with a double bond bridging the two coronene moieties. The bonds connecting the two moieties should be drawn as pure single bonds.
(Proof: any such resonance structure must either have one or both bridging bonds written as double. If only one bridging bond is double, then each coronene moiety must contain 11 1/2 pi bonds - impossible. If both bridging bonds are written as double, all of the double bonds are locked as horizontal and the two ends are left hanging.) Magic9mushroom (talk) 06:58, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ball-and-stick picture is incorrect
Talk:WAXS

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for an X-ray diffraction technique used to determine the crystalline structure of polymers is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the diffraction technique. - Dravecky (talk) 08:50, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/U.S. road transport articles by quality statistics

message: Is the template needed to have an extra row that is supposed to be empty? I'm confused. O_o Artisol2345 04:05, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're not supposed to edit that page unless the bot really screws something up. I don't see a problem with the table. --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:08, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ?

message: Shouldn't the total stats include the list articles?  --Son (talk) 05:11, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Total stats
Talk:Miles Mohawk

message: According to this it flew for the first time in August 1936, and according to this was certified to fly [in the UK] in January 1937. Meanwhile, this mentions that Lindbergh was already flying it [in southern Ireland] by December 1936. I'll assume these dates are correct and change the article accordingly. Drutt 04:06, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds reasonable, I had originally referenced another site that listed January 28, 1937 as the first flight Miles Mohawk. FWIW Bzuk 12:48, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First flight date

message: Miles aircraft were characteristically a low-wing, light aircraft, and can be described as a "classic" (defined as serving as the established model or standard) Miles design that most Miles aircraft embodied, while many of the light aircraft emanating from the United States during the 1930s, were high-wing designs, such as the Lockheed Vega. Given Lindbergh's involvement in the project and his well-known interest in aircraft design, what emerged from the collaboration was a combination of American and British elements.FWiW  Bzuk (talk) 14:33, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: The Miles Mohawk design
Talk:Lake Eola Park

message: *The original version of this article incorporated text from the Wikipedia article Lake Eola. -- But|seriously|folks  04:24, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution

message: I've seen two sources that indicate different max depths of the lake. The City of Orlando indicates that the max depth is 28 feet while an article in the Orlando Sentinel states that there is a sinkhole north of the fountain that is 80 feet deep. It has to be one or the other. Aswilliams (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 22:05, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Lake Facts

message: This article was originally entitled Summerlin Park.  I see no references to this name being used, and signage at the park and references to the park on city and county webpages refer to the park surrounding Lake Eola as Lake Eola Park.  I welcome any veriable documentation that shows this park is or once was referred to as Summerlin Park so that such information may be incorporated into the article. Scrouds (talk) 18:25, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The park may have indeed been orginially referred to as Summerlin park as Jacob Summerlin donated all of the land and stipulated that it be turned into a park. Frank0051 (talk) 20:50, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Summerlin Park
Talk:Cartoon Alley

message: I have severe trepidations about whether or not the show is continuing or not.   I haven't seen any reruns of this show for the last two months; I wonder if the show has been put on hiatus.  --Cinemaniac 18:06, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I guess one of the page's current categories proves that it ended in 2007.  Too bad; I really enjoyed the show! :(  I'll go ahead and copy-edit the article to past tense. — Cinemaniac (talk  •  contribs) 03:00, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the show still on? 

message: It's not on TCM's website, so I doubt it's real. Gilliganfanatic 02:42, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for season 4?
Talk:Separation property (finance)

message: I have redone the article from scratch. I will add in citations from my portfolio textbook when I regain access to it, and remove the reference warning when I have done so. I have also removed the notability warning from it as I have now made it clear that it is a crucial element of Modern portfolio theory.
JJMcVey
Update - done! After rereading my textbook I found that I had it slightly wrong, so I fixed that too. Reference warning removed.
JJMcVey 09:43, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article (re)started
Talk:The Outsider Festival

message: Removed section as it takes the form of an advert.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.112.92.137 (talk) 09:37, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 2009
Talk:Shenzhen Peng City F.C.

message: The redirect Chengdong Sports Park Stadium has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  IDontHaveSkype (talk) 22:03, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Chengdong Sports Park Stadium]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Can we confirm or deny if Sichuan FC and Sichuan Jiuniu were in fact the same organisation? If so, this would mean that New Peng City can be traced back to 2006 instead of 2017. 77.99.36.10 (talk) 04:51, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: They are not the same club. I'm aware that the history of this article dates back earlier than the formation of Sichuan Jiuniu F.C., but I believe that is a mistake too far beyond something that can be corrected. IDontHaveSkype (talk) 11:54, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sichuan FC
Talk:Pinecrest Academy

message: This entry does a good job of telling the history of Pinecrest's development, architecturally and locationally. However, there is little information about the curriculum that sets Pinecrest apart from other schools and the many achievements (athletic, artistic, etc.) that should be emphasized.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CMK3294 (talk • contribs) 16:31, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kinds of Information
Talk:Financial News Network

message: An edit I submitted seems to have been deleted, but it is critical this edit remain - since most of this submission is entirely inaccurate.
I have not had the opportunity to correct each error, but will certainly undertake this lengthy task as soon as possible.  In the interim, the objective facts regarding the Financial News Network are much more accurately represented by the submission for CNBC, the successor in interest to FNN.wordkrafter (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 06:06, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correcting Major Errors in FNN Submission