Talk:Wendelstein 7-X

message: For a project that was supposed to take only a few years to complete, an eight year schedule slip seems to imply that something very odd happened. This article doesn't mention what that might be. And that seems to be a major failing. Can anyone expand this? Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: To my knowledge, the time schedule was simply to optimistic. As far as I understood there ware just many problems, as this is a quite big project with just very many possibles for failures. E.g. the superconducting coiles needed longer for delivery and where not delivered in the expected order. Source: Talk by (one of?) the leaders of the project earlier this year. 136.206.123.117 (talk) 16:09, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: May have been similar to the coil shape problems that caused construction of National Compact Stellarator Experiment to be halted in 2008. Stellarators difficult to build? The construction of Wendelstein 7-X. Klinger mentions many of the problems, including redesign of structures. - Rod57 (talk) 02:02, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened, exactly? 

message: The device is finished and is currently tested. https://www.ipp.mpg.de/3850444/w7x_15  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.206.123.117 (talk) 16:12, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update of article 

message: Redlinks really aren't that nice, so Wendelstein 7-AS should be created, it's crucial for the understanding of the research pre-7X. Thanks! :) Cheers, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 14:56, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wendelstein 7-AS]] 

message: Even distribution of images would be a good place to start.  Should the building appear in the infobox? Viriditas (talk) 11:55, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Wendelstein 7-X. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.physicstoday.org/resource/1/phtoad/v64/i9/p30_s1?view=print
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150716225905/http://research-in-germany.org/default/en/research-landscape/news/2015/07/2015-07-07-magnet-tests-on-wendelstein-7-x-successfully-completed.html to http://research-in-germany.org/default/en/research-landscape/news/2015/07/2015-07-07-magnet-tests-on-wendelstein-7-x-successfully-completed.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:40, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I noticed the following sentence was incomplete: "Then, on February 3, 2016, , with production of the first hydrogen plasma to initiate the science program." Missing content between the two comma's?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.211.239.121 (talk) 20:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing content 

message: The Timeline section needs updated as the last entry states that OP2 should begin in 2019. It now being December of 2019 and seems that OP2 may not begin until at least the coming year (2020.) Just a humble suggestion to keep the page from being out of date. Thank you.
--HenryTjernlund (talk) 03:19, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline needs updated