Talk:Political views of Adolf Hitler

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:11, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: This is the first time I've contributed to this article, and of course, my contribution has its source. Reference is also provided for the quote in Stefan Ihrig's book. See. - Aybeg (talk) 10:28, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, my initial edit summary was incorrect.The problem is that the quote from the book you provided does not directly support the declarative statement you made, which is that Ataturk influenced Hitler's belief in the power of the will.  The quote is about something entirely different,  "Atatürk was the first to show that it is possible to mobilize and regenerate the resources that a country has lost."  That has nothing to do with belief in the force of will.While I don't doubt that Ataturk may have had some influence on Hitler, I don't believe that the importance of "will" was one of them, since it's present in Hitler's speeches and writing almost from the beginning.  In any case, you need a citation or quote that directly supports the contentionsthat Ataturk was influential in Hitler forming his belief in the force of will. Beyond My Ken (talk) 10:38, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see. Well, can't a new subheading be opened? Like "Inspirations", "Interwar influences", or "Foreign influences during the interwar period". Mussolini can also be included in that subheading. Maybe  would like to comment on this topic. - Aybeg (talk) 07:41, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

text: *This view is not shared by any other subject expert that I'm aware of, making it WP:FRINGE and WP:UNDUE in this context. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:11, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Unsourced" 

message: If you want to translate it, just give us a call. Regards 2804:14C:5BB1:8AF2:66FC:81CB:2576:144F (talk) 02:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{Ping|Luizpuodzius}} 

message: User:Confluencerist, you have twice removed Alfred Rosenberg as an influence on Hitler, with the edit summary "Scholars have confirmed Alfred Rosenberg's philosophy and worldview were not influential on Hitler". However we've got at least four sources that say otherwise:
* Kershaw 2000, pp. 268–269
* Stern 1975, pp. 45–53
* Evans 2003 page 178 says: "Rosenberg more than anyone probably turned Hitler's attention towards the threat of Communism and its supposed creation by a Jewish conspiracy... 'Jewish-Bolshevism' now became a major target of Hitler's hate."
* Toland pp. 136-137 of the paperback edition covers influences similar to what Evans describes.
So if you with to remove Rosenberg as an influence, you will have to bring some sources to support your claim. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 12:37, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's make that a third time Confluencerist (talk) 19:34, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: How about those sources then?  — Diannaa (talk) 05:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alfred Rosenberg 

message: Modern sources elucidate the anti-capitalist development of Hitler, his more complicated views on the implementation of democratic elements in a racial republic and what he most likely covered up after the fact in order to not detract from his own favorable impression as a resolute candidate for Führer. 83.255.180.77 (talk) 11:36, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a vague, incomprehensible agglomerate of about eight subjects crammed into too few words. --Hob Gadling (talk) 13:52, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editors should read Mein Kampf and study  more modern updated sources