lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bannister Federal Complex

message: Just my two cents, but does so much information about the former Kansas City Speedway need to be included in this article? It seems to distract from the main focal point Bannister Federal Complex. Is there someplace better, perhaps even its own standalone Wiki, for that information? Also I noticed that until I added it in passing there was no information about the Superfund sites in the article nor the numerous illnesses and deaths linked to them by a KC tv stations investigation. Maybe a rewrite of most of the article is in order? Sector001 (talk) 06:31, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More focus needed? 

message: DFAS-KC was a large section of the center of the building, and a MAJOR activity (USMC).  Why so little mention?
NOAA/NWS had their repair and waste/reuse operation there...
Why is there zero mention of the BeO in the ventilation from the neutron lens manufacturing?  Seriously?!?! There are some seriously sick people as a result.  Did they not have to close down the entire complex as a result?
71.56.206.95 (talk) 16:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  BeO poisoning, other tenants...
Talk:Bonnington Pavilion

message: Is the section on The Hall of Mirrors at Ossian's Hall relevant to the subject of the article?  Mrslippery 22:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is the best example of how the Bonnington Pavilion may have functioned. Rosser (talk) 21:05, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I decided to remove it since a single link to the article suffices. - Dudesleeper /  Talk 05:29, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ossian's Hall of Mirrors

message: Thanks Mr.S. Yes - As you say it is not relevant to the article. Rosser (talk) 13:49, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miscellany 
Talk:Underwater demolition

message: I would suggest linking to efforts by Benjamin Maillefert and Julius H. Kroehl, as both were the leading experts of their time during the 1850s.  Both were involved in clearing obstructions in the Hudson and East Rivers around New York City.  However, using underwater demolition went back further.  Both men applied what was called the "Paisley Method".  One could go back as far as David Bushnell to see the use of underwater explosives.  I suspect it goes back even further, given the history of salvage operations.maclilus (talk) 14:25, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have reliable references, go ahead and improve the article. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 19:14, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: PRE-AMERICAN CIVIL WAR

message: MOS recommends standardised reference formatting, and it is required for FA. I propose to standardise the reference formatting by converting all the references to CS1 list based format, as I find that easier to work with. Several of the refs are already completely in that format, many others partly in that format. I intend to make the changes unless there are rational objections from someone who is willing to propose a MOS compliant alternative and personally ensure that all the refs are standardised to that alternative format.
Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 15:58, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardising reference formatting
Talk:Tha Hoodz in Us

message: I tried to look up sources, and found two claiming that the release date was 2010. However, the article was made in 2007, so I'm not sure how it would have been made before the album was released. 
https://www.discogs.com/release/8031491-South-Central-Cartel-Featuring-Tha-Floc-Gang-Tha-Hoodz-In-Us
https://www.rapmusicguide.com/cd/2719/south-central-cartel-tha-hoodz-in-us
Also, if it is indeed 2010 (somehow), then South Central Cartel would be affected. 
207.72.1.93 (talk) 16:07, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Hawker Nimrod

message: It would be good to simplify the reference list by having only one Mason, and that the more recent one.  So if someone has the 1991 ed, maybe he/she could put in the page numbers of the Nimrod article and of the relevant part of the "Individual aircraft" section at the back.TSRL (talk) 22:25, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs
Talk:Richard W. Bailey

message: I am about to add sources and other information which should validate the subject of this entry as notable individual.
Here's some of the additional info:
Washtenaw Community College
Trustee, 1974-present;
Treasurer (1977-79), Secretary (1979-81), Vice-Chair (1981-85), and Chair of the Board (1985-94, 1999-2000).
Named honorary faculty member, 2002.
The Richard W. Bailey Library was named for him in 2005.
Dictionary Society of North America,
President (2001-2003).
Fellow, 2005-present.
American Dialect Society
Vice-President (1985-87), President (1987-89)
University of Michigan
Distinguished Faculty Achievement Award, U-M, 1989
Regents' Award for Distinguished Public Service, 1992
U-M Press Book Award, 1993, 1998
D'Arms Award for Graduate Mentoring, 2001
Selected Publications
Rogue Scholar The Sinister Life and Celebrated Death of Edward H. Rulloff
University of Michigan Press, 2004
Images of English: A cultural history of the the language, University of Michigan Press, 1991
Nineteenth Century English, 1998 UM Press
Associate Editor, The Oxford Companion to the English Language Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
BarbaraEllen 23:50, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Try to add some book reviews of his books, and a reference to the naming of the library for him. But it wont be deleted. DGG (talk) 02:45, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: also needed
Talk:Cars of the Stars Motor Museum

message: Anyone know of a more comprehensive list of which cars were sold to where? Chaosdruid (talk) 15:42, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rest of the cars 
Talk:Kolej Yayasan Saad

message: Hello, Is it really nescessary to write the School Song? {Hellboy2hell (talk) 10:12, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does it need? 
Template talk:S-s

message: Please add template to :Category:Internal link templates, and remove .—Leo Laursen ( T ¦ C ) 06:29, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  Ral315 (talk) 06:34, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request Jan 2008 

message: Please replace Category:Internal link templates with  to allow non-template-editors to develop documentation for this template. I have added the current category to the doc page. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 02:21, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: — xaosflux Talk 17:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 23 April 2019
Template talk:Number of relations

message: Surely {} and {(x,x)} are both reflexive binary relations over {x}? (Hence there are 2 reflexive binary relations over a 1-element set.) Hairy Dude 23:07, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Reflexive" means that x must be related to itself. This is true for {(x,x)} but not for {}. —David Eppstein 00:21, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes.  {} is reflexive over {}, but not over {x}. CRGreathouse (t | c) 03:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

message: The number of the symmetric relations on an n element set is 2^(n-th triangular number), which is not in OEIS, only a shifted version of it. That is linked currently, but it is not denoted, that it is shifted. I am somehow satisfied how the template looks now, and I don't think it needs further clarification, yet, if there is a way for it, it can be done. Thanks, 157.181.151.144 (talk) 14:54, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The number of symmetric relations on an n-element set is A006125(n+1). - CRGreathouse (t | c) 16:17, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to denote shifted OEIS? 

message: It might be worth noting that the number of irreflexive relations is the same as the number of reflexive relations. Abm9856 (talk) 18:30, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  number of irreflexive relations
Talk:Keiko Chiba

message: The article seems to be mostly a write-good article without any criticism.
For example, take the description here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_Japan#Execution
I did not write anything, neither about the article about her, nor about the article above. But the article above points out the problem of her opinion, and then her actions as politician (justice minister), even one statement claiming she witnessed an execution (while being justice minister). This, then, raises the question to me how you can be OPPOSED to capital punishment, but as minister you endorse/support/help carry it out? That makes no sense! So why does the article about her have nothing about this? It's ok to not write too much on the main article about her, to not make it too biased either, but a brief mention should be done, and then a link to the already-existing article about capital punishment in japan, which has more details. Right now the article here, though, does not even MENTION that; and I only found it indirectly by coming from that other wikipedia article. 2A02:8388:1602:6D80:C080:419D:679D:C9F8 (talk) 14:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism
Talk:List of contaminated cell lines

message: I think this needs an expert to clarify the meaning of the article.
You don not think update the topic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.180.84.221 (talk) 09:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Please see (and add to) Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Molecular and Cell Biology#Refactoring of the cell line lists if you are interested in this. Tomdo08 (talk) 20:30, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refactoring of the cell line lists
Talk:Aprilia RS250

message: I threw up an NPOV. Phentos (talk) 02:19, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is irrelevant that it is out of production or available in small numbers. The article should be re-written from a neutral point of view using independent sources. It's the same standard for all Wikipedia articles. --Dbratland (talk) 15:47, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

text: So fix it! --Biker Biker (talk) 13:59, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looks like an advertisement, so...
Talk:Ganga Dynasty (Western)

message: The article names Western Ganga Dynasty and Ganga Dynasty (Western) having different contents, are conflicting to each other.
Can the author of this new article, explain the rationale of this name/article, and how this is different from Western Ganga Dynasty ? Thanks - KNM  Talk 00:13, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict with [[Western Ganga Dynasty]]
Talk:Oberrottenführer

message: Just needed to refer to the article because the term has just been used in a tweet by an Afghan vet colonel, so pro forma I object to deletion. Darmot and gilad (talk) 14:12, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Object to deletion 

message: The rank was also used by the Forstschutzkommando, in occupied Poland. 84.23.155.84 (talk) 21:34, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fortschutzkommando
Talk:List of alumni of RADA

message: Is this list for anyone who's done any course at RADA? Amo 23:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No! I've just gone through and taken out the reds/un linked. I think if you have a WP which has been deemed notable then you belong on this list if not you're out. RaseaC (talk) 17:13, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Criteria

message: I am disappointed not  to be  listed as an alumnum of RADA.
I was accepted, with the offer of a scholarship ,in 1970.Leaving in 1972.
On leaving I was awarded The Forbes Robertson Prize for Shakespeare.
I have had a long and successful career, playing leading roles in major regional theatres, television and films. 
I was invited , twice, to join the RSC , without audition. I played  Stratford and the Barbican, in  significant roles.. with no understudying. I also played leading roles in The West End, and around London. 
In 1999, I formed my own production company, and toured the world...including Off West End and Off Broadway...for 15 years,  playing 2 solo dramas about Sherlock Holmes, over 800 times- with truly exceptional reviews. Some theatres invited me back 4/5/6 times , due to the sellout success of the plays.
 At 70, I am still being offered work; and devote a lot of time and effort to being a 'Buddy' to 'Finals Students' at RADA.
I would suggest you consider entering my name on the RADA alumni list of Wikipedia.
Roger Llewellyn  ( rogerllewellyn@onetel.com)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.98.248.55 (talk) 11:35, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roger Llewellyn 

message: Hi
I graduated from RADA in 1975.  This was with my equity name Amanda Leigh.  I worked as a professional actress until 1982 when I married and moved to Wales.  Following a divorce I returned to my maiden name Rackstraw.  More recently I have taught drama and worked as a solo performer and storyteller.  I am also a published poet and short story writer.
It would be good to be acknowledged on Wikipedia as a RADA alumni.  I left in Dec 1975 with a diploma.  As I also worked in theatre before I went to RADA; I had in total a 15 year career before marrying and moving to Wales.  
I assume you have the means to check RADA Alumni.  If not, I have the certificate; I could send a copy.
Many thanks.
Amanda.94.10.64.233 (talk) 22:44, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  RADA Alumni
Talk:Folgore-class destroyer

message: We cannot say that something is a copy when it is different. The lineage of Italian destroyers is well-known and discussed in terms of design progression and stages where design changes were less dramatic. But the series of four-ship classes prior to the Soldati class did see gradual enlargement and improvement with each iteration. That the Freccia was the design basis for the Folgore is not in doubt, but to declare the class "essentially copies of" the preceding one is not accurate; enough alterations of form (length, beam and draught all differed between the two, minutely enough to produce a measurable difference in all three yet still look very similar) were present to produce a hull whose displacement was affected by more than just the beam difference. This required its own set of drawings and calculations to achieve, which is not copying. 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:355E:5E4C:ABC3:B1DA (talk) 02:02, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not "essentially copies"
Talk:A5 (Croatia)

message: This name has never been used in a newspaper article or any other adequate material, neither have I heard of it myself although I live in Croatia. The claim about connecting the whole Slavonia is also false, so I'm putting a  in that section. The fact that the highway is a part of Corridor Vc is the reason why is this highway being constructed, so I returned the Corridor Vc name. Admiral Norton 23:50, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Slavonika" (?) 

message: First off, kudos for the hard work people have put into this article. It is thorough and informative. I hope my copyedit can help it reach GA status, which I feel it's near. Below are some questions and suggestions.
* Old: "The motorway represents a significant north–south transportation corridor..." New: "The A5 represents a significant north–south transportation corridor...". I hope that word referred to the A5. (If not, change it back; I'm looking to limit repetition of the word "motorway" as much as possible.)
*:Yes it did.--Tomobe03 (talk) 18:37, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the effort! I'll try to address these issues before proceeding to the GAN.--Tomobe03 (talk) 18:37, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedit comments 
Talk:Gormogons

message: The current article text is taken almost word for word from dialog from the Fox TV show Bones, episode Inter in the Incinerator. It aired on November 6, 2007. I doubt if it's entirely accurate, if credible at all.
-----
I agree, I'm watching this episode right now, and this article is almost the exact dialogue. After a Google search, it appears that the Gormogons did exist, but this article needs a complete rewrite in order to be credible.TDude695 (talk) 01:55, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Zaka Ullah Bhangoo

message: I checked the article against the B-Class criteria (click on the link for a more detailed description of each criterion):
#The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations where necessary. —  The first paragraph in the 'Early life and army career' section, touching on his pre-retirement life, is uncited.
#The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. —  More information is needed about his 30+-year service with the Pakistan Army. Additional information about his early life and later personal life (family, activities) also would be useful.
#The article has a defined structure. —  Although content is organized in separate sections, the current structure does not really include "all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind" (a biography of a general).
#The article is reasonably well-written. —  It contains "no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly".
#The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. —  It contains a reasonably complete infobox and persondata. A photo would be nice, but is not essential.
#The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. —  The article does not really contain many "technical terms"; most of the potentially unfamiliar terms or names are merely of places or types of aircraft, and are appropriately wikilinked.
On the whole, I think this is a good start toward B-Class, and some expansion of the article with reliable sources would do the job. Best, -- Black Falcon (talk) 16:50, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-Class evaluation
Talk:Saint James Church massacre

message: Whether or not it is relevant to the tone and intent of the article, does anyone know whether the rifles used were AK 47's (7,62mm), 74's(5,45) or AKM's etc?
:Interestingly enough, the guns used were R4s, not AK47s. That would make the rounds 5.45. The hand grenades were American. Go figure. -Kieran (talk) 11:46, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI, the R4 is 5.56mm Socrates2008 (Talk) 23:40, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assault rifles 

message: I've started referencing and cleaning up this article. It needs a bit of wikification, too (there are external links which should be references, and other formatting problems). Anyway, if I get around to it I'll come back and work further. The TRC reports are a good source of accurate information on what happened. -Kieran (talk) 12:31, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup and referencing

message: I'm unclear on what this line means -
"Nonxuba died in a car accident while on bail in November 1996, thereby leading to an incremental increase in public safety in South Africa.[1]"
The only way I can read it seems a little opinionated/facetious for a Wikipedia article105.233.76.219 (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion of Nonxuba's death
Talk:Braxton County High School

message: The 25 percent dropout rate listed on this page is not supported with data available data on the WV DOE website. Can the source of the 25 percent figure be provided?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hodgescb (talk • contribs) 13:42, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Royal Geological Society of Cornwall

message: Would it be useful to have a list of those to whom the Bolitho Medal has been awarded?  Vernon White . . . Talk  21:40, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This would be useful: only a few show up from a search here on "bolitho medal".--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 19:27, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: William Bolitho Gold Medal
Talk:Sasha Filippov

message: Sasha was not declared a traitor in the film.  Commissar Danilov said that to Sasha's mother rather than tell her Sasha has been hanged. EinsatzKmndo (talk) 02:30, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sasha Filippov
Talk:Grain (cipher)

message: I'm sorry if I'm stepping on someone's toes here, but I thought the description "serious weaknesses" seemed a bit biased. The fact of the matter is that Kucuk's paper only documents a finding that shows that for some (K, IV)-pairs there exist related (K',IV')-pairs that generate a shifted version of the same bitstream. Although this is a potential weakness there are no known cryptoanalytical attacks that can exploit it. I feel that "potential, but not as yet exploitable, weaknesses" is more nuanced.
I have no connection to the eStream initiative or either of the creators of Grain. Neither am I an expert cryptoanalyst. I have however designed a hardware implementation of Grain (v1) for a low-security application, and have since tried to follow whether the cipher has been broken, since there was some controversy with the first version. I think this Wikipedia article should reflect the consensus that, Grain has a weakness in its initialization phase that could potentially be exploited, but this does not amount to a "serious weakness".
Robinhoel 00:07, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't see any consensus on whether this weakness is considered to be serious or not. So far, Grain has been included in Phase 3 of eStream. There is no need for Wikipedia to make any advance judgement on whether this weakness will be considered serious or not by the eStream committee. All Wikipedia should do is  report that there is a potential weakness and leave the judgement to eStream. Standardisation committees usually don't wait until a weakness becomes exploitable before they drop a candidate. 85.2.52.164 11:56, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: In my opinion we should include Grain-128a A New Version of Grain-128 with Authentication, 19th July 2011  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.152.173.165 (talk) 12:10, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grain-128a
Talk:Blandford (Mount Dora, Florida)

message: I attempted to photograph this property today, 10-03-08, but was not successful.  It appears to be an occupied residence, which sits off the road way and is completely surrounded by orange groves.  The sign at the entrance to the property was marked "No Trespassing." Yakin669  —Preceding undated comment was added at 16:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Z-4 Plan

message: Please note that there exists no official confirmation of RSK authorities acceptance for this plan. The claim about their acceptance is based on a rumors from serbian forums. 
Pjosip (talk) 15:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 22:01, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag