Talk:Mnemosyne (TV series)

message: ehh, anyone know anything else about it?  68.8.219.56 (talk) 09:23, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: First header

message: Charano! is a shounen and seinen magazine. Indicative? What do you think? --Koveras ☭ 21:32, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I don't think so. The primary subject of the article is the anime, so no target demographic should be placed here. Incidentally, there's an ongoing dicussion about demographic here. Kazu-kun (talk) 23:03, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. --Koveras ☭ 06:56, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

text: If the anime is the primary subject, why did the infobox get changed? I thought the primary topic of the article was supposed to get first billing in the infobox. -SeaFox (talk) 03:34, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally, the infobox is arranged in chronological order, regardless of the primary subject of the article. Kazu-kun (talk) 03:48, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographic 

message: I removed this section because it was redundant with "OVA" (under "Media"), which already has this info and in prose form. I think any further info about the soundtrack should be added there for the time being. Kazu-kun (talk) 16:34, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I merely moved the music section into the OVA section to make it easier to read and less redundant; I mean, both songs were written, composed, and performed by the same people, so there's no need to list it out twice. Plus it's better to have prose rather than an embedded list.--十八 22:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, sorry, I didn't notice the last sentence of the section. My bad. ^^;; --Koveras ☭ 11:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Music section

message: How about eventually extracting the episode list to a separate article? FLCL got one, too... --Koveras ☭ 16:27, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode list 

message: Changed the name spelling of Apos to Eipos, as that is how it is spelled in English Alphabet on the Production DVD. Here is a screenshot from the DVD...  --Ichigo69 (talk) 05:04, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: Hm, is Mnemosyne really an OVA? According to the Xebec's site, it "airs on the first Sunday of every month on AT-X"... so it has to be a TV series, doesn't it? Plus, it also says that the most recent DVD to have been released is the second one... Even ANN seems to be confused: it calls it an OVA but lists AT-X as a broadcaster. --Koveras ☭ 09:42, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The japanese wiki has it as a TV anime with AT-X as broadcaster also. I'll go change it. Iron2000 (talk) 16:30, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Part of the confusion is probably from the fact it only airs once a month and has so few episodes in total. -SeaFox (talk) 21:52, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 

message: Now that the series is over, I suggest following revamping for the article:
* Split the character section into a separate list article.
* Remove the character section altogether, instead having a see-also link at the top of plot section.
* Write a complete (that is, spoilerific) summary of the series' plot for the plot section (I can take over this task, since I'm good with summarizing things).
* Wait for some English-language reviews to show up, so that we can start a reception section. ^^; Erica Friedman's blog may be a good place for that.
Thoughts, ideas? --Koveras ☭ 18:24, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the length of the article right now is good. I vote we wait until after the summary and reception sections are in place before the characters are spilt off into a separate artcile. --SeaFox (talk) 19:21, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The length, maybe, but not the proportion of plot section to the rest of the article. ;) Characters section counts as plot, you know... --Koveras ☭ 19:31, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It makes no sense to think about proportions when the article doesn't have any real-world (encyclopedic) content yet. Until then I have to oppose. Kazu-kun (talk) 20:26, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Media section is the real-world content. Though I agree with Kazu on this; the characters section takes up most of the article now, and if it's split before the additions are added, it'll look pretty stubby.--十八 21:18, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

text: I assume you meant "the character section doesn't count as plot", ;) but in this case it does. The long character sections include events that happen to them in the show. That's why I think the other sections should be developed first, even though it would be very easy to split off the character section right now and make a new article. We'll be missing the plot info it provides to the main article. Plus, as I meant when I said "the length right now is good", removing it will leave a stubby article. --SeaFox (talk) 00:51, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I meant exactly what I said: character section does count as plot summary, albeit structured by character rather than chronologically. While I still maintain that with a good plot summary, character section would only include secondary information, I have to agree with the stubbiness argument. Therefore I'd say we leave the revamping until a full plot summary and a reception section (and, perhaps, a production section, anyone?) are written and then consider it again. --Koveras ☭ 10:58, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revamp 

message: Mania.com OVAs BR Mania.com Complete DVD UK --KrebMarkt (talk) 12:06, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s) 

message: In the infobox, the listed "English network" is 2x2, which is Russian. Did it actually air in English? ミーラー強斗武 (talk) 20:57, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: i was hesitant to removing it because it has been said that Russian network would contain English anime. I'm not 100% sure on that, but i did not add it in, so i wasn't sure if this particular case was true. Lucia Black (talk) 15:20, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I can confirm that, according to Russian language sources (specifically, the 2x2's corporate blog), Mnemosyne has indeed aired on that channel in Russia. However, I am quite certain that this is not what is expected in the infobox field called "English network", so I call for its removal from the infobox for being factually irrelevant there. As for the anime airing on English language networks, I have no data on that. --Koveras ☭ 16:26, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you confirm by source? The English network is only whatever network released it in English, not that the network is primarily English. Lucia Black (talk) 18:00, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, perhaps I should have made it more clear: the show aired on a Russian channel in Russian, not in English. --Koveras ☭ 20:44, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Therefore it should be removed/corrected? ミーラー強斗武 (talk) 03:57, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: In my opinion, yes. --Koveras ☭ 06:47, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  English network? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mnemosyne (anime). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080530011756/http://www.comic-valkyrie.com/main/contents/mnemosyne.htm to http://www.comic-valkyrie.com/main/contents/mnemosyne.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018)