Talk:John Edward Robinson

message: This article was automatically  assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 17:41, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: :Image:John Edward Robinson.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:31, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:John Edward Robinson.jpg

message: :Image:John Edward Robinson.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 22:09, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:John Edward Robinson.jpg

message: I saw no reason to have a reference to a book series in this article. Robinson followed a BDSM --which is the most well known term for it-- lifestyle, and calling it anthing else is likely to confuse readers. Unless someone can point out how the series directly influenced Robinson to take up his lifestyle I'm removing the reference.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.13.149.10 (talk) 09:53, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gor lifestyle?

message: Yeah, it's needed but I don't have my sources handy just now. Will have to wait a few months unless others want to step in?214.13.149.10 (talk) 11:49, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation

message: Yes, you have to keep it in. 1 of the women murdered was very familiar with the gor lifestyle. Gor lifestyle is more all encompassing. A person gives up their IDENTITY to the master including bank accounts and SSN. It would have alarmed a "normal" person to sign a slave agreement, but someone familiar with Gor would find it appropriate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elizabeth98011 (talk • contribs) 12:44, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  gor lifestyle 

message: My research indicates that there was never any group, even a secret one, by this name.  Given Robinson's propensity for lying and exaggeration, it's more likely he concocted this group at some point, either to mislead investigators and researchers, or in a bizarre attempt at self-aggrandisement.Desmond Ravenstone (talk) 02:43, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no doubt that you're correct, since Robinson has seldom purposefully said anything truthful in his life -- but unfortunately, you can't add it to the article without citing the references you used in your research.  The reference currently cited does not say it was a fictitious organization.  If you have reliable sources saying it was yet another of Robinson's fabrications, feel free to make the change again, and cite the sources. Cheers, DoctorJoeE (talk) 16:16, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't seem right to keep it in as a stated fact with nothing else to back it up. I think that part would be better stated as "He claimed to be part of" than a flat out "He was part of."70.236.76.41 (talk) 23:48, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I find this source about as reliable as the source offered for the support of the International Council of Masters.  The offered source for the existence of this group is the only one that I've been able to find, and, by itself, does not offer a single clue as to where that information might have come from. All research into the provided sources do not come up with a single mention of this organization. It appears to be a student project and one wonders how reliable that source can be.108.213.241.108 (talk) 20:35, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

text: Can't say that I disagree.  So is there consensus for removing that sentence entirely? DoctorJoeE talk to me! 22:11, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "International Council of Masters" 

message: The section with the above title is unsourced, and I have been unable to find any evidence that it is true.  Even if it is, it does not contribute significantly to the article and demonstrates no relevance to it.  So I'm going to remove it in a few days, unless someone objects strenuously and can put forward a cogent argument in support of that objection. DoctorJoeE talk to me! 13:44, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Email hoax 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on John Edward Robinson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131004231910/http://voices.yahoo.com/woman-wins-lawsuit-halt-profit-sought-man-who-366573.html?cat=9 to http://voices.yahoo.com/woman-wins-lawsuit-halt-profit-sought-man-who-366573.html?cat=9
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111009170220/http://www.livedash.com/transcript/cold_case_files-%28sex%2C_lies_and_murder%29/612/KICU/Tuesday_February_23_2010/204568/ to http://www.livedash.com/transcript/cold_case_files-%28sex%2C_lies_and_murder%29/612/KICU/Tuesday_February_23_2010/204568/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070121194127/http://www.courttv.com/trials/robinson/ to http://www.courttv.com/trials/robinson/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:45, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Edward Robinson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713161906/http://www.kmbc.com/r/9236762/detail.html to http://www.kmbc.com/r/9236762/detail.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:10, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Can’t find on how he died, does anyone know? ThatGuyCade (talk) 23:17, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Still alive. Larry Hockett (Talk) 05:33, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did he die By lethal injection or Electric Chair