lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pi bond

message: This article desperately need expansion. Especially since it's such an important topic in MO theory.--Rejnal 06:10, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. The entire article, at this point, could be summed up as: Pi bonds are pi bonds. It is only informative if you were unaware of the existance of pi bonding to begin with. There is nothing here that would help someone understand why and how pi bonding occurs. --Matt D (talk) 09:37, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: yes, an expansion is necessary especially concerning the fact that it is of Top importance to wikiproject chemistry. I can't believe that nobody in that project has tried to improve it due to this high importance level. Matt.leeck (talk) 17:18, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: "Atoms with double bonds or triple bonds usually have one sigma bond and the rest are usually pi bonds"
Surely this is not the case; carbonyl carbon with three sigma and one pi, carbon of ethene with three sigma and one pi.....or is something else intended by the statement?
:I suspect it means that in a multiple-bond between two atoms, one of those bonds is σ and the rest are π, which is a generally reasonable explanation for most people for most compounds. DMacks 21:14, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading statement? 

message: Section Special Cases says...
In some cases of multiple bonds between two atoms, there is no sigma bond at all, only pi bonds. Examples include ... dicarbon (C2)
But the Dicarbon article says....
 
However, molecular orbital theory shows that there are two sets of paired electrons in the sigma system (one bonding, one antibonding), and two sets of paired electrons in a degenerate pi bonding set of orbitals.... This is surprising because the MO diagram of diatomic carbon would show that there are two pi bonds and no sigma bonds.
Dave 2346 (talk) 19:03, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction concerning Dicarbon 

message: First of all, the section doesn't really fit. It is a series of pictures with long captions; furthermore, the third one only describes sigma bonds.
Second, it doesn't seem necessary. If I understand the intention of the section, it's to demonstrate that pi bonds cannot be rotated like sigma bonds can. This is already alluded to earlier in the article. Understandably, images would help understanding, but these images confuse me more than help me. What would work best are two 3D images side by sides of p orbitals parallel to each other and perpendicular.
Perhaps these views are only my own, but hopefully I'll get some comments? --Uhjoebilly (talk) 15:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the section "Effect of bond rotation" necessary?
Talk:Aeolian Islands

message: The "castello" in Lipari is actually called the "cittadella". 
There is a lot of important information missing from the entry. Stromboli, besides the Etna and Iceland, is the only active vulcano in Europe. You have Vulcano which is semi-active and where the Greek god Vulcan was believed to live. Saline where Eolo the Greek god of wind was believed to live. When in high school I published a lengthy article on the ancient history of the islands. Not sure the creators of this website would be interested in it. 
 
FYI, this article used to have a large chunk of text relating the history of a volcanic island that emerged from the sea called Julia. I removed the text from this article because it clearly wasn't in the Aeolian Islands.  The actual article that the text refers to can be found at Ferdinandea. --NormanEinstein 22:26, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article lacks sourcing and reads like a tourist brochure.  71.8.193.122 (talk) 04:26, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourcing

message: You mention Frederick II, Duke of Swabia in 1208 but he died in 1147. You must mean Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor, unless your date at 1208 is wrong (?).  Please confirm or fix,TonyMath (talk) 13:31, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: which Frederick II?

message: quote from section "History": "During World War II, all seven of the Aeolian Islands were under Allied control by August 1943." ?Wikirictor (talk) 02:04, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question! I'm sure it was all eight, but the 1943 newspaper source says seven: "Fall of volcanic Lipari and Stromboli Tuesday put all seven of the Aeolian Islands in Allied possession, headquarters announced Friday." There's probably a better source on the Aeolian Islands during WWII that would clarify?Penny Richards (talk) 02:34, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Taking out the word "seven" for now, less precise but also less confusing.Penny Richards (talk) 02:35, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: 7 or 8?
Talk:In on the Kill Taker

message: Pretty sure Albini did not record the unreleased first recording of this (or anything ever?) at Chicago Recording Company.  This was before he opened electrical audio, so it would have been recorded at whatever his home base was to record in Chicago at that time. Can anyone else confirm?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:384B:39B0:18C9:B9EE:A172:12B0 (talk) 04:12, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Albini recording location

message: Guy plays the clarinet and not the flute on Red Medicine, but I don't know if it's a flute or a clarinet making those sound in Smallpox Champion as it's stated within the article. SchnappM 05:44, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the review section, it says that rolling stone writer Matt Diehl gave the album a 5 star rating and claimed that Fugazi were the only band that really mattered. This sin't true. Today, on the website, this album has a 4 star rating and it says, "In 1993, that claim [of being the only band that matters] belongs to Fugazi". SO i'm going to change it in 2 days unless somebody wants to show me another review.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrJohnSwan (talk • contribs) 20:47, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: The review Section
Talk:Priest...Live!

message: The first sentence of the article says the album was recorded on June 15 and June 27, while the info box states it was recorded on June 20 and June 27. Which is correct? Darkday (talk) 21:59, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Recording Date
Talk:Megan McCormick

message: In the "Arab Gulf States" program — which I believe was filmed earlier this year (2006) — in the scene where Megan was trying on an abaya — the women in the store said the style she was trying on was popular for customers who were "married and young".  Megan replied, "I'm neither of those things."  I know this seems to complicate earlier reports that she got married, but whatever . . . . Richwales 00:41, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, this episode was filmed years ago... but it's part of Season 5's airing schedule.  I saw a clip of it a while ago, long before she had her kid. --Madchester 19:58, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Married?

message: This fan site says her daughter's name is Amelie Rie, not just Rie. Anyone have corroborating resources for this info? Vesperholly 23:16, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Daughter's name

message: Her own website says it's 1973, so maybe it should be changed and sourced there.82.141.117.224 (talk) 02:41, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth year 

message: Megan  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.242.50.46 (talk) 16:47, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Megan McCormick
Talk:Mesoamerican pyramids

message: This article can be improved.  I did a few things to help it while someone else was putting it on the speedy delete page.  This is clearly an encylopedic entry and needs a chance as a stub to be developed. Vegaswikian 22:38, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  This article actually does not say anything about the pyramids... It can be improved a lot... I will try to add more info about it.  Nanahuatzin 15:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy delete

message: Sorry. I didn't pay proper attention to vfd protocols and went and moved it from  Aztec Pyramids to Mesoamerican pyramids. (In my defense, the former was an v. inappropriate name.) As a result, the vfd votes are now split over 2 templates. Can someone more skillful fix that, or should I be wiping up my own droppings? –Hajor 22:57, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Panic over. Just moved it back. Suppose it can be relocated once vfd's over, yeah? –Hajor
Which ones are the oldest?
bla bla bla  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.30.30 (talk) 16:24, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Page moved

message: With what tools were the stones worked to produce these buildings and from where was the materials for these tools sourced?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cautious 20571 (talk • contribs) 23:20, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tools 

message: — Assignment last updated by Profmexhist (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Indigenous Latin America

message: Added significant section titled "The Debate over Olmec Architectural Influence" 
More information will need to be added, but I believe it is a necessary and important addition to the existing article. JohnFrum1441 (talk) 23:00, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added section
Talk:Port Coquitlam-Burke Mountain

message: Changes from Port Coquitlam to Port Coquitlam-Burke Mountain included:
* Inclusion of Douglas Island
* Removal of Westwood and other areas in Coquitlam, east of Port Moody
**A major growth area. Not much population in 1996, but lots in 2001
Not much difference between the two electoral areas. All the differences come from the population growth in the area (ie. not from the redistribtion) between elections.
Port Coquitlam-Burke Mountain growth included 4,791 people and about a $10,000 increase in the average household income. 2001 from 1996
-17 May 2005, maclean25
*Ideally, I'd like to see only election results from the riding named Port Coquitlam-Burke Mountain on this page and a link to the former riding of Port Coquitlam where results for that would be. However, there is no article yet for the former provincial electoral district of Port Coquitlam and I'd rather concentrate on expanding current ridings first. Your temporary fix of declaring the boundary changes that took place in 1999 is satisfactory to me. DoubleBlue (Talk) 22:57, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 1999 Redistribution
Talk:Cruelty

message: In my eyes, it's more of a wiktionary article.
217.60.43.5 06:28, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this really suitable for wikipedia? 

message: Leuricy- antonym of cruelty definition= The utter absence of ill or hurtful intentions characterized by impartial love and/or hospitality.
Usage: She became a saint because of the leuricy she showed towards others. Also can be an adjective (leuric).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cutlerowns19 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leuricy 

message: This reads like an add for Beauty without Cruelty. Its clearly cut and paste from a website, its not suitable at all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ultan42 (talk • contribs) 23:03, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "In consumer products" section 

message: It might be tempting to conflate cruelty with anger, but anger usually emerges in abrupt, destructive actions that reflect transitory rage or a desire for personal revenge. Cruelty is often chilly in its execution and often reflects either indifference to suffering or active seeking of others' pain. Anger might be sated quickly and regretted, but cruelty is typically more permanent. An unwholesome political order like Nazi Germany can cultivate it as a unifying force of the culture. 
Anger often gives a warning; cruelty typically operates under cover of a difference in power between the one who inflicts pain or ruin and the one who endures it.Pbrower2a (talk) 14:14, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Eighth deadly sin?" 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Be mean. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 22#Be mean until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 16:59, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Be mean" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Hostile behavior has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 17:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Hostile behavior]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Being mean has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 17:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Being mean]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Coding strand

message: This was the original article. Probably fine to be this short, not even sure if it's needed, but it is incorrect.  The coding is the complement to the template.
:"The coding strand is basically a template strand that is used in the coding of proteins.  Also known as the (messenger strand)."
I'm not familiar with the term 'messenger strand', but if somebody knows which strand it refers to, they're welcome to add it to the 'Alternative Terms for Strands' section.
Probably longer and more detailed than is warranted (like this talk page is getting) so if anyone wants to streamline it, or move parts of it, feel free.
Jenks 23:19, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Babes in Arms

message: Only the very first version of this article purported to be about the Rooney-Garland movie. Immediately on pass 2 it got converted to an article about the original source musical. Only problem is the plot synopsis bore a vague resemblance (with some caveats) to the plot of the Rooney-Garland movie but had absolutely NOTHING in common with the plot of the original musical other than kids putting on a musical review. No, the stage musical has NO threat to send anyone to a work farm(!!!), the money is raised for a theatre stage owner to pay off a dept- he lacks full creative control of his theatre until he does. This almost 100% false plot summary was in this article for eleven years!!! There are plenty of online databases of broadway shows in which this could have been checked out! Obviously, not enough people have been watching this article.--WickerGuy (talk) 05:01, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently, there is a revised/updated adaptation of Babes in Arms in circulation and the earlier version does indeed have the work farm motif. Need to research further. The production I saw last night has the newer plot which has apparently been in wide circulation for several years. Sorry then for the rant!!! Now need to research.--WickerGuy (talk) 05:10, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, according to this website  "In the late 50's, Rodgers commisioned a sanitized, de-politicized rewrite. It is the version of Babes in Arms which has been produced for the last forty years". OK, tomorrow will fix article to reflect the existence of two version!!--WickerGuy (talk) 05:13, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Completely wrong plot summary for eleven years!!!!! 

message: So he couldn't have been involved with the 1950s rewrite! Just pointing this out. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 00:42, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Wouldn't have meddled further here - but your first "correction" didn't make sense. Nearly put "Rodgers and George Oppenheimer" but am not sure to what extent Rodgers was concerned with whatever musical changes were made, since he didn't usually orchestrate his work himself. Anyway - you fix it if I have got the wrong end of the stick! --Soundofmusicals (talk) 09:33, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Lorenz Hart]] died in 1943!!
Talk:Alberni-Qualicum

message: The changes from Alberni to Alberni-Qualicum include:
*Inclusion of Qualicum and other areas to the east
Qualicum is a retiree hot spot. Alberni is a declining resource town.
In 1996 Alberni had a population of 31,652 people.
In 2001 Alberni-Qualicum had a population of 50,695 people.
Alberni-Qualicum lost 0.2% of its population between 1996 and 2001. BC Stats
Should the 1996, 1991 election results appear on the main page?
maclean25 23:25, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, those results belong on Alberni (electoral district), and they have already been posted there.  PKT(alk) 13:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: 1999 Redistribution

message: This article should talk about the area that Alberni-Qualicum covered, and it should also mention what happened to it; ie. what riding(s) were created to represent it?  PKT(alk) 13:41, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article expansion
Talk:The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen

message: A Kentucky librarian was recently fired over Volume IV, claiming it was pornographic - it's made quite a stir.  Anyone more skilled with wiki formatting want to include this?
http://www.kentucky.com/latest_news/story/1011029.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.41.65.237 (talk) 04:48, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Censorship 

message: Does anyone object to me setting up automatic archiving for this page using MizaBot? Unless otherwise agreed, I would set it to archive threads that have been inactive for 60 days.--Oneiros (talk) 01:49, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: --Oneiros (talk) 16:23, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archiving 

message: 2010 March 28* —Paul A (talk) 06:31, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category deletion discussion 

message: That should be deleted because none of that is true i think, i can't find the source or anything for them! nowhere!--24.7.204.40 (talk) 03:44, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You can't find any sources for that section, even though four sources are explictly listed in the footnotes? Extraordinary. —Paul A (talk) 03:44, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The Reception And Influence

message: Please note the deletion discussion here:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_League_of_Extraordinary_Gentlemen_timeline_(2nd_nomination)
--Epeefleche (talk) 08:28, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  deletion discussion 
Talk:Never Let Me Down

message: Is Mickey Rourke (mid-song rap on Makin' My Love) the actor Mickey Rourke?  If not, this wiki link should be removed.
Pugetbill (talk) 14:42, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musicians 

message: I am working on an article for '...the interview,' which was a promotional-only album released alongside NLMD that includes some album tracks and a bunch of answers for a pseudo-live Q&A session with whatever DJ chose to read the questions. I think it makes more sense include that article here rather than in its own article, since virtually everything (producer, credits, etc) are the same. What do people think?
87Fan (talk) 02:53, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The Interview

message: How well did it sell ?
"Bowie said that, while the album sold more than any of his previous albums" - but "Let's Dance" looks to have done better in the UK and US anyway. -- Beardo (talk) 21:17, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sales 
Talk:Latent homosexuality

message: This may mean a hidden inclination or potential for interest in homosexual relationships, which is either suppressed or not recognised, and which has not yet been explored "for real" or may never be explored in fact.
In other words something that can be postulated arbitrarily, as convinient for arguments that can't be disproven because it is "latent".
:Talk pages don't exist for this kind of debate. TaintedMustard 17:54, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: But this article fails to explain what "latent" actually means. --74.101.43.43 (talk) 14:11, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The image at the top of the article showed an individual who is identified on the image page.  The caption suggested that he might be a latent homosexual.  I'm pretty sure that that is against WP:BLP#Images, so I'm removing it.  Scolaire (talk) 21:22, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image caption 

message: I edited the part that was suggesting that the cited study "indicated" that homophobes were repressed homosexuals, since this is not what the study indicates, something that was also explained later on the paragraph.
Moreover, I'd like to change the current cited study to this one that is more recent and done better, but I lack the linguistical skills (I'm not a native english speaker). Psy.hip (talk) 18:45, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  On Links to Homophobia
Talk:Monster truck

message: I'm hoping that I might be able to get some help working on this subject.  Although I'm not a rabid fan, my son is.  :)  I'd like to get the trucks in and clean up this article.  Additionally, I'd like to see about getting a standard infobox created for the trucks.  If anyone can help, please let me know.  Wikibofh 00:02, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm making the request to stop adding in links to redneck articles in this article.  While I do not object to the "rural residents" part of the article, classifying monster truck fans as rednecks is POV in my opinion. Arenacale 00:31, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monster trucks and rednecks 

message: Bigfoot_and_the_Muscle_Machines —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.136.145.226 (talk) 04:20, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Animated TV series

message: Are there regulations defining what a monster truck is for competition purposes? For example, I'm sure active suspension would help a monster truck, but I don't believe they have them. Also, is there documentation about the incentive structure for drivers and teams? How are teams funded and what incentivizes them to do things that run a high risk of damaging their vehicles? —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 23:02, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class definition? Incentive structure
Talk:Mladá Boleslav

message: just checked the map and mlada boleslav is clearly northeast of prague... took the freedom to edit the page accordingly :)
Hi i might know explain to you how its work. i'm from slovakia so we've got it similar. there are 14 kind of districts area. And every that area has got a main district town or city, which controling and administrating whole district area. But they all belong under government.
But Prague as a capital city has got itselfs's control as a district. it's mean there are no any other villiges belong to prague. 
I hope i'm right if not just edit me.
I would have thought that Emil Škoda would have been an important personality of Mlada Boleslav?80.192.246.56 (talk) 14:10, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  northEAST of prague
Talk:Edmund G. Ross

message: "Profiles in Courage" is not a novel.--70.110.148.184 00:23, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled