Talk:Elections in Taiwan

message: Excellent information here, but are there any references or sources we can site? It looks a little sparse right now. --Asiir 23:51, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Since this article only covers elections of the Republic of China on Taiwan era, it might be better to move it to Elections in Taiwan and then we'll be able to add some Taiwanese elections during the Japanese rule era. Just a thought.--Jerry 23:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: Procedural close, discussion ensued on addition of new content outside of the current scope of this article. IAR: Leaving some of the lower newer comments open. (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 20:31, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Elections in the Republic of China →  – I want to add information about Taiwanese elections under Japanese rule. Coco977 (talk) 18:24, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: When readers search for "Elections in Taiwan", they should be able to find information about Taiwanese elections under Japanese rule. If we put it under Taiwan under Japanese rule, readers wouldn't.--Coco977 (talk) 16:40, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This article isn't about elections in Taiwan. RGloucester  — ☎ 16:56, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This doesn't solve the problem. How about writing a new article of Elections in Taiwan that is partially the same with this article?--Coco977 (talk) 16:59, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I would find that acceptable. The RoC has governed Taiwan for part of its history, but has also existed during periods when Taiwan was not under its governance. There is a clear potential for a Taiwan article that deals with the full breadth of Taiwanese history, and an RoC article that deals with the full breadth of RoC history. RGloucester  — ☎ 17:07, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

text: It was four years ago, and the article does not include material on "pre-Taiwan" elections anymore.--Coco977 (talk) 11:10, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Whoops! Looked at the month, and missed the year. I'll strike, and revise my opposing rationale. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:33, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
*Procedural comment: RM deliberately closed at this point so further discussion about new content to be added can continue outside of the RM process. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 20:31, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

text: The question is, where did the content you suggested existed on the subject of 1912–49 disappear to, and why did it do so? It should be brought back. As of now, I cannot find it. It is obvious that 1912–49 should be covered in this article. However, it seems that elections from 1912–49 are not presently covered anywhere in the encylopaedia. RGloucester  — ☎ 14:45, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there is nothing about 1912–49 in the encyclopedia yet and I have already written the draft about Taiwanese elections under Japanese rule, why not move the page to Taiwan and change the scope of the article?--Coco977 (talk) 15:58, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it seems like that content was removed for the sake of such a change, which is a nonsense. In any case, this is about the RoC, not about Taiwan. If you want to have a Taiwan article, make a Taiwan article. The RoC and 'Taiwan' are not the same thing. RGloucester  — ☎ 18:07, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 August 2016 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
* Oppose – I can't understand the rationale, and it seems like a bad move. Dicklyon (talk) 05:22, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: This article does not include referendum, only dates. Hansen033 (talk) 07:06, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referendum 

message: Just use https://www.cec.gov.tw/ . Jidanni (talk) 17:20, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better CEC link