lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fort Pitt (Pennsylvania)

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: The Fort Pitt foundry did cast major ordinance before and during the Civil War, including mortars used in the defense of Charleston, South Carolina.  It was named after Fort Pitt, not located there. It was in the Ninth Ward Strip District (Pittsburgh) at 12th and Etna.Pustelnik (talk) 16:05, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fort Pitt Foundry

message: Hoo, hahh. Wow. I'm still laughing and wiping my eyes. Let me catch my breath here. Sorry. The first paragraph of this article states that the French garrison "viciously mauled" an attacking British regiment in September 1758. Well, yeah, I guess they did. They did kick their behinds pretty bad. To this day, Braddock's defeat is still an embarrassing loss for the British. But today, a dispassionate and professional historian of whatever nationality should simply say that the French garrison and their Indian allies "soundly defeated" the attacking British regiment. A crazed and rabid dog might "viciously maul" an innocent bystander. Or an enraged grizzly bear might "viciously maul" a hapless hiker, but to say that the badly outnumbered French garrison of Fort Duquesne, occupying a fort that they had built on land that had been first explored and claimed by the French explorer LaSalle, "viciously mauled" an attacking British regiment that outnumbered the French two to one, betrays a pretty slanted view of history. If the British regiment under General Braddock had soundly defeated the French that day, would you say that they had "viciously mauled" the French garrison? I doubt it. This choice of words implies that the French had no right to try and colonize the North American continent, but the British did. Utter nonsense. PGNormand (talk) 19:28, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Viciously mauled..."?

message: The article says, in part "Erected in 1764, it is believed to be the oldest building still standing, not only in Pittsburgh, but west of the Appalachians."  I have no doubt that a 1764 building would be the oldest in Pittsburgh, but is it older than Mesa Verde? Various Pueblos? Any part of New Orleans? Surviving forts in and around the Great Lakes? 
I suspect the author intended something along the lines of "The oldest building in Pennsylvania west of the Appalchians."DavisGL (talk) 04:02, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Oldest Building??

message: Is there any information on who designed the fortification at Fort Pitt? The style is identical to the fortifications of Vauban, a Marshal of France and the foremost military engineer of his age.Tvbanfield (talk) 02:44, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Who designed Fort Pitt?

message: Barbara (WVS) (talk) 20:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Wow, this needs a lot of work
Talk:José Chamot

message: seizoen                   team                                    games                       goals
88/89                     rosario central                     19                              0
89/90                     rosario central                     10                              3
90/91                     rosario central                     10                              0
90/91                     pisa                                     20                              0
91/92                     pisa                                     33                              1
92/93                     pisa                                     34                              0
93/94                     foggia                                 30                               0
94/95                     lazio roma                           28                              1
95/96                     lazio roma                           32                              0
96/97                     lazio roma                           29                              0
97/98                     lazio roma                           11                              0
98/99                     atletico madrid                    33                              1
99/00                     ac milan                              13                              0
99/00                     atletico madrid                    12                              1
00/01                     ac milan                              14                              0
01/02                     ac milan                              23                              0
02/03                     ac milan                              2                                0
total                                                                   353                           7
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.84.166.101 (talk • contribs) 
Moved by --Mariano(t/c) 12:40, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anon edits
Talk:Duquesne Incline

message: Rated Class=Start to match NRHP rating; Rated Class=High due to historical importance. – Paschmitts 12:09, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pittsburgh Assessment

message: This is NOT a standard gauge, but 5 foot. Pustelnik (talk) 01:36, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's not "standard gauge" but it is *a* standard 5 foot gauge which was used in Russia and (still) in Finland. DMorpheus2 (talk) 18:44, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Gauge
Talk:Compass Tours

message: Since the AfD discussion resulted in a keep, not a no consensus, that means that this article has been deemed sufficiently notable to have an article here. Unless I am misunderstanding something about AfD process...? Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 11:39, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. I have removed the tag. MickMacNee (talk) 12:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Would someone mind explaining what is notable about the company?  The article really doesn't make that clear at all. --  JediLofty UserTalk 12:09, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  From WP:N: "[It] has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 14:22, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

text:  I disagree that because the article survived the AfD process that it cannot be tagged. Olana North (talk) 13:26, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  It was brought to the community for discussion, and the discussion resulted in a keep—the article's subject is notable. If there is disagreement so soon after an AfD, it should be brought to WP:DRV, not slapped with a "notability" tag. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 14:22, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability tag
Talk:Transportation in Pittsburgh

message: if im driving from buffalo to florida or from indianapolis to washington I would have to exit and re-enter the very route I'm driving on, thus there is no difference between 70 to 70 or 79 exiting then reentering 79 and what you must do on the beltway around Pittsburgh Hholt01 08:23, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beltway 

message: One of my edits to this page was reverted as link spam.  This was a link to a web site which I maintain, Pittsburgh Bike Racks, which has a map of bike parking locations.  It is a noncommercial site intended to support the efforts mentioned in the article to make Pittsburgh a more bicycle friendly city.  Since a major part of the citywide bike plan is provision of more bicycle parking and since my site documents the progress of that plan I believe it is relevant to the article and also useful to a potential reader. There is no other site I'm aware of through which that information is available.  The article already includes external links to local bicycle advocacy organizations and to specific bike rental locations.  Therefore, I think a link to the bike parking web site, either in the body of the article of in a separate external links section, would contribute to the purpose of the article.  Pghbikeracks (talk) 16:28, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bicycle Transportation
Talk:José Cuevas (boxer)

message: First of all, excuse me for my poor english. Now:
His real name is Pipino, not José. He has stated it many times, last of them in Argentina's newspaper "La Nación" (sports section: Canchallena), on May 19th (http://canchallena.lanacion.com.ar/1583234-pipino-cuevas-yo-me-preparaba-para-pelear-veinte-rounds). He said: "Todos piensan que es un apodo, pero Pipino es un nombre italiano. Yo me llamo Pipino Isidro Cuevas González. No me llamo José, me canso de aclararlo y siguen sacando José..." ("Everybody think that it's a nickname, but Pipino is an italian name. My name is Pipino Isidro Cuevas González. I'm not José. I'm tired of correcting it, but they are still putting José..."). The article must be changed. I didn't do so because I dont know how to change the article title. --Sumbutrule (talk) 11:31, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real name is Pipino
Talk:Death, Desire and Loss in Western Culture

message: I have the impression that the sources used in this book are too limited. Dollimore claims to describe the history of the western culture within the context of death, desire and loss. I haven't read the whole book yet, so i can't give a definite review.--Daanschr 14:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While reading further, i came to understand why the writier is limited in his description of the past. He is pre-occupied with postmodernism and not with pre-modern, medieval or ancient thought. Therefore, the entire article has to be changed. I tried to change this article, but a user reverted it. I am willing to negotiate further changes with him and others.--Daanschr 11:21, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Review of this book
Talk:Allegheny County belt system

message: Hello.  Why are the articles for Red Belt, Blue Belt, Purple Belt, etc., sill considered stubs?  I've seen the shows on WQED, haha, but I don't really know what more one can say about them on an encyclopedia.  Just curious SolitaryThrush 04:49, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I'm more wondering why they need separate articles at all, for precisely the same reasons: there isn't much you can say about each one, and a regional road seems to be significantly less notable than a globally-recognized term for a martial arts rank. I'll watch this page for a while, and if there's no object, I'll try merging them into this article (which needs a bit of cleanup anyway). Tlesher 04:03, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree. You know...in the years I lived in Pittsburgh I NEVER heard ANYBODY--native, newcomer, whatever--refer to the belt system. I was Mr. Road Map but I could not have told you anything about which belt went where. I even remember people (including natives) make jokes about people's non-use of the color labels of the belt system. Of course, things could have changed in 15 years. PurpleChez 12 July 2007 12:09 EDT
FWIW, the History section of this entry appears to be significantly lifted/paraphrased without attribution from the copyrighted text of Jeffrey J. Kitsko, found at the PA Highways web site.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.131.84.190 (talk) 03:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

text: Well noted, though that site says "Page updated June 21, 2009"... So it's hard to say which predated which. Anyone feel like looking it up on archive.org? —Notyourbroom (talk) 03:50, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Stubs

message: I have a map produced by the Allegheny County government (complete with Dan Onorato's face on it) that says the orange belt is a complete circle. Is there anyone with a definitive statement on the completeness of this belt?--TheZachMorrisExperience (talk) 05:34, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full circle 

message: The Yellow Belt includes a short section of Brownsville Road. Pustelnik (talk) 01:29, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Brownsville Road

message: This is an image from the Green Belt article that was merged into here. I can't find a place for this image in the article at the moment. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 08:52, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Green Belt image

message: Hello, I have made an accurate and current map of the belt system using Google Maps . I feel it would be a useful resource to link to on this page, even though it is my own work. I would be happy to add the link if we agree that it would be appropriate (or someone else may). ESRoads (talk) 00:11, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Map of the Belt System
Talk:Cotswold Rail

message: It's not explained what a pink background (eg for 43157) means. 86.143.52.241 23:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fleet list colour key 

message: I have changed the Advenza section to bring it up to date and in line with the Advanza article. I have also deleted the reference to 33202, which is no longer at Gloucester (even according to this article!) and the reference to Advenza's locos being stabled there. Please edit if any of this is inaccurate. JohnB57 (talk) 14:49, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advenza Freight 
Talk:Causus maculatus

message: Note to User:Guns N' Rockets: "Spotted night adder" is not even a "popular" common name for this species. As a matter of fact, none of the common names for this species are "popular". A quick Google shows that the scientific name for it is more than ten times more "popular" than any of the common names. --Jwinius 14:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Carlisle, Pennsylvania

message: I made a small historical correction.  James Buchanan technically did not graduate from Dickinson School of Law, as the law school had not officially formed yet.  He did graduate from Dickinson College in 1809.Jim Line (talk) 10:33, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Buchanan

message: I'd like to point out that I do believe the specialty auto shows such as all-GM, All-Chrysler, and All-Ford and the others are regularly scheduled.  They're around the same time every year.  --166.217.227.232 (talk) 03:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Auto shows
Talk:José Manuel García-Margallo

message: Why is this article titled José García-Margallo y Marfil? His name is José Manuel, not just José. Spanish names have no middle name. To be clear:
Given name: José Manuel
First or paternal surname: García-Margallo
Second or maternal surname: Marfil
The title should be changed. --IngenieroLoco (talk) 10:37, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Lacking sound evidence for the current title, I've pulled the change. I've randomly clicked some already cited sources and it's José Manuel García-Margallo or Jose Manuel García-Margallo  in them, not José. I don't see a rationale for Marfil, either way.--Asqueladd (talk) 13:19, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Intangible/Proposed decision

message: How can a proposed decision be put forth when only one arbitrator has yet looked at this case? The same goes for moving this case from "Evidence" to "Voting". Intangible 14:54, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Somehow there are not yet comments by arbitrators on the "Motions and requests by the parties". To jump to a proposed decision seems highly premature here. I waited for presenting evidence, because no comments were made yet by arbitrators. Now it seems to be too late... Intangible 19:03, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not too late to present evidence.  Sam Korn (smoddy) 19:24, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motions and requests by the parties 

message: Am I missing something? As stated, the required majority is five since there is one abstention. The voting is 5-1 only, majority of four. Passed? Charles Matthews 08:03, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Remedy 3
Talk:José Roman (boxer)

message: I changed Kash N Karry to Sweetbay. I know this for a fact since I actually worked at the same store with him. Nice guy. He seems to have a speech problem. ~ Joshua  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.32.151.93 (talk) 02:56, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:José Kléberson

message: Don't think having played for Manchester United should be in the first paragraph. He's not there now and make it seem as if playing for them is more important than anyother team. Plus his Man Utd career is so insignificant. 84.64.231.230 19:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manchester United 
Talk:WEXP (La Salle University)/archive

message: The WEXPfest is a tradition of the radio station and had been going on for more than 3 years. I removed DJ names and just stated that they have existed in the past and there have been plans to have them exist in the future. Lasallefan keeps removing the edits, calling them vandalism and irrelevant. I feel weak and powerless because the mods don't do a thing to check. I'd like an administrator or a moderator to rule on it. Is the information I've posted in the past about WEXP relevant? Pacdude 21:55, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: **Throwing my name in the hat here, I must clarify, that the initial deletion was NOT by user:lasallefan, so no I did not have an initial problem with the User: Lasallefan except now he started acting like he owns this page. It would incongruent with the wikipedia spirit, not to mention wexp's, for either him or myself to keep persisting like the owner and the moderator of the content.  Delinodeshields 15:28, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed... Nobody likes a self promoter Delinodeshields 15:28, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is WEXPfest irrelevant?
Talk:José Lind

message: Several mentions of his gold glove fielding, but no mentions of the crucial error he made in the 9th inning of the NLCS in 1992, that may have cost the Pirates the pennant?  I think he is far more remembered for that play than for his knife collection or what he looked like on a certain baseball card.  Yet every mention of the critical error is removed.  Why?  66.232.73.40 (talk) 01:10, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:José Luandino Vieira

message: The following could be added to the list of works, but I can't date them. Can anyone?
*A cidade e a infância
*Vidas novas
*No antigamente, na vida
*Macandumba
*Nosso Musseque
Thanks in advance! Andrew Dalby 18:43, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:José Luís (footballer, born 1958)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 04:56, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 11:33, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 31 March 2021
Talk:José Luis Brown

message: Irish-Argentine? Is Brown from Black Irish stock? Is this true? Is it relevant? 
Also, when and how does anybody "support" this page? To the best of my knowledge, the only person supporting it is yours truly. 
We need less boxes and more writers. elpincha 16:58, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind... --Mariano(t/c) 18:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On a similar note "I heard down the pub" that he was rlated to William Brown (admiral) - any truth?--Vintagekits 00:00, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. Wish it were true, but nope. elpincha 00:42, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Two legends anyway!--Vintagekits 00:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Until evidence surfaces pointing to such a relation, we should assume they are not related. You cannot collect evidence that people are not related. elpincha 13:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Admiral? No, El Tata is related to James Brown. Try finding sources against that; it has to be true! (Sometimes a good irony makes a better case). --Mariano(t/c) 15:07, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: LeBron James? elpincha 19:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Nah, that one got lost during the finals; will have Manu nightmares for the entire summer. --Mariano(t/c) 20:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationalities
Talk:Task Force Mustang

message: I was an enlisted deployed in Iraq for OIF with this the 36th CAB. What they fail to say is that I was the only Puerto Rico National Guard element in the entire Brigade. It is very offensive that in the list of States or National Guard units listed, the 92 BCT PRARNG(my unit)is not present. I did fight for real and I was one of the very few soldiers from that Brigade that can state being engaged by the enemy. I was one of the few that experience what is called “real action”. I brought up this several times and the "leaders" disregarded saying that I was only one (1). So that's basically means that I don’t count? That me and my Unit are insignificant because I was only one? Where are the proud, the honor and respect between fellow Guardsmen? I want to say to the leadership of the 36 CAB: Remember me and don’t you dare lave Puerto Rico out of the history, out of your story. Like it or not I served and risked my live several times to do the best for the mission and the unit, so you have to Include me and my unit in your Task Force List. Shame on you!
Ernestonieves (talk) 06:16, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the 44 States
Talk:José Luis Castillo

message: This article seems incomplete without some information about the "controversial" fight with Mayweather. Deepfryer99 (talk) 14:47, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Spotted night adder

message: Note to User:Guns N' Rockets: "Spotted night adder" is not even a "popular" common name for this species. As a matter of fact, none of the common names for this species are "popular". A quick Google shows that the scientific name for it is more than ten times more "popular" than any of the common names. --Jwinius 14:57, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Deltic Preservation Society

message: D9009 'Alycidon' is now mainline registered and ran its first railtour on 25/03/2012.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.249.90 (talk) 17:12, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

message: I do agree with most of the assessment that this article needs improvement. I will see what I can do GRALISTAIR (talk) 13:29, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvement
Talk:José Luis Sierra (footballer, born 1968)

message: Hola don José Luís, usted no me conoce me llamo Carlos Garrido Cortés y mi número de celular es el siguiente, 61167074
Le parecera raro este comentario, pero tengo a mi hijo sin club y es un muy buen arquero,
Le cuento que estuvo entrenando en Wanderers junto a Castellon y después se fue a la Universidad de las Americas a seguir estudiando, 
Jugo en la selección adulta de Casablanca en 2007 con 17 años y fue su arquero titular y salieron campeones regionales, después se incorporo a
Defensor de Casablanca en Tercera división B, Subieron a Tercera A y tuvo que dejar su club por la edad ya que actualmente tiene 26 años y no puede seguir en esa categoria, tenia un ofrecimiento del club Mejillones en segunda división, pero no prospero por el sueldo que le ofrecian que era de
$ 400.000.- más la estadía, él quería un poco más. 
Yo pensaba si usted podría darle un oportunidad creo que no se arrepentira.
El se llama Cristopher Brian Garrido Santibañez, nació el 2 de febrero del 1989, su rut 17.006.728-2 Arquero
Lo saluda Atentamente,
Carlos Garrido Cortés  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.37.102.25 (talk) 15:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Talk:José Luis Soberanes

message: Dear editors,
Mr. Soberanes has already left his position as head of the CNDH, which is currently headed by Raul Placencia. The article needs an update :-)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.216.51.120 (talk) 01:25, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled