lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:David III of Tao

message: I passed the article on the GA nomination, after correcting some language. Congratulation! Eixo 15:44, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you Eixo. Cheers, Kober 16:09, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA 

message: Gamarjoba Kober! I really appreciate your work on David III. Just a few minor remarks: 1) There is good reason to believe that the Byzantine court title of kuropalates was already bestowed on David in 978, and that he was granted the title again in ca. 990, after it had been taken away from him because of his support of Bardas Phocas during the second rebellion against Emperor Basil II. 2) David father was Adarnase Kuropalates (958-961), and not Bagrat, eristavt eristavi, as accidentally stated by you. The latter was David’s older brother. 3) David did not inherit the eristavt eristavi-title from Bragrat; already in 961 he bore the Byzantine court title of a magistros. 4) The cross you are displaying on the web-page is not a personal, but a processional silver cross. It was made by the goldsmith Asat (inscription on lower arm) due to a commission by David Kuropalates. Keep on the good work! Best wishes, User:Sofie.
Hey Sofie, thank a lot for your remarks. I'm very happy to have a chance to make proper corrections as the article is a Good Article nominee. Thanks again. --Kober 09:36, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good work!

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. Although I have passed this as acceptable, I think that it does need some work doing to it and it might not qualify under current guidelines if submitted at GAN today. I think the prose is somewhat unusual and should be thoroughly copyedited. I would also like to see more sources, especially in the Issues of succession section. I expect that more could probably be found to say about this man, and without further information this article would never make FA. Finally it might be an idea for someone familiar to create some pages for the various persons mentioned but not linked in he article; this would help provide greater context to King David. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Jackyd101 (talk) 15:42, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps

message: I have tagged the article for cleanup. A substantial amount of the article is unsourced and appears to be original research. There are a few cn tags already in the article, I have tagged the top and will try and find sources. The unreferenced content should be removed per WP:V unless verifiable reliable sources (not pseudo-historical chronicles and websites) references are provided and restored only if properly referenced per WP:BURDEN. Citations should be provided in full for verification.  // Timothy :: talk  08:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Canadian horse

message: Proposing a merge because, in my research to buff up both of these articles, it appears that most sources consider the Pacer to be a subtype of the Canadian horse, rather than a true breed. The information currently in the Pacer article is all that I could find on the breed in several hours of focused digging, so it would not be a bloat to this article to merge it here. Dana boomer (talk) 01:50, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me.  Making the pacer a subsection will avoid content forking now, and if later it is independent enough, will be easy to spin back out.  Montanabw(talk) 22:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Galiceno

message: I had a purebred one who was a classic buckskin. They are not always a solid color. 66.219.235.183 (talk) 18:50, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color
Talk:Pickles (dog)

message: so the heck what?  Why is this an article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.254.185.65 (talk • contribs) 
:Mmm, quite a famous dog, you know. The JPStalk to me 23:12, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not at all. Pickles is a famous dog. The JPStalk to me 09:45, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The dog qualifies as notable as per wikipedia guidelines. Badbilltucker 17:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

message: This seems implausible seeing as a replica of the trophy sold for £254,000 according to the main article. Soundwave (talk) 17:47, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not at all. I think the cost of making it could well have been £3000 in material costs. It's now £30,000 at most in the article, which I think is right because it was ensured for 30K and the cost of making it would have been lower. Also, there is already already a comparison of prices between 1966 and "now" in the article. I would think that 1) the replica would have been almost identical to the original and 2) that the price would be about right after conversion between those two dates.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.95.237.162 (talk) 17:07, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worth £3000 

message: It wasn't £6,000. It was £1,000. British Pathe has filmed evidence of the cheque being presented (this can be viewed on YouTube).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.2.82.121 (talk) 09:33, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reward 

message: Why do people post incorrect or spurious facts, knowingly I might add, to enhance the interest level of the item. My "vandalism" is a legitimate protest and should not be censored.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.69.50.14 (talk) 05:30, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Will vandalise until factually correct
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ho'od win?

message: I find Wikipedia's deletion and debate policy curious.
The way it stands, if an Administrator is unfamiliar with
a particular subject matter, they assume everyone is, and
thus deem it "non-notable".
Further, it does little good to provide documentation to refute
the decision to delete, because people are stubborn by nature,
and are loathe to reversing their mindset.
If this sounds like sour grapes, well, I suppose it is.
The fact is, I hate putting a lot of work into an article, only
do have it dismissed out-of-hand.
Spycat 13:12, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:GÉANT2

message: please update the page or delete it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.176.18.215 (talk) 21:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Should merge into one updated article with citations W Nowicki (talk) 21:52, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  began officially on 1 September 2004, and is due to run for four years
Talk:Hyson Green

message: I live nearby Forest Fields Recreation Ground - there are no tennis courts whatsoever. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.229.33.18 (talk • contribs) 15:14, 16 June 2006.
Following unsourced (original research) material inserted by 81.76.18.89 removed:
( Correction .. Pre 1960 There was no crime hardly and all though poor housing The houses were Homes with hard working freindly people who lived for their family and neighbours helping each other to clothe , feed , and tend their children ...today it is full of crime without homes either )
--IslandGyrl 22:10, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Uppark

message: Reference needed for the statement that a firefighter was killed in the blaze in 1989. (The deaths of two workmen killed in 1990 when the scaffolding round the house collapsed in a storm is attested in books on the restoration, but the firefighter's death is not)
Ghughesarch 13:15, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 08:44, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Talk:Indonesian Mujahedeen Council

message: Here are the references for the info over the page.
http://www.theage.com.au/news/War-on-Terror/Hardliners-call-for-war-on-US/2005/05/22/1116700588054.html
* Placed this in the page as a source for quote. (not sure how to ref. properly yet) Lsjzl 13:26, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction/straw poll

message: The below was a straw poll held to determine whether Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction) should be adopted as a guideline, a policy or rejected as either.
===Guideline===
Writing about fiction should be accepted as a guideline, part of the Manual of Style.
# Fieari (based on comments)
# BrianSmithson 14:20, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Although it is a poll, would you mind elaborating a little bit more?  Just curious since I've seen such strong support for it. -- Ned Scott 06:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: his one major contribution to wikipedia is Book of Shadows (Charmed). Zzzzz 23:37, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Pardon me? I've contributed to more than one article. As for my reasons, I reject the premise of the proposal entirely. Obviously, it has strong support, but I felt I should register my objection. —Mira 09:31, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I think the question was why do you reject it? DJ Clayworth 18:02, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Straw Poll

message: Writing about fiction should be accepted as a guideline, part of the Manual of Style.
# Fieari (based on comments)
# BrianSmithson 14:20, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Guideline

message: Writing about fiction should be enacted as a policy; merely a guideline is not enough.
# Improv - confirmed, although as guideline would be better than nothing. --Improv 10:40, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Policy

message: Writing about fiction should not be given a formal mandate or needs to be changed first.
#Reject —Mira 06:50, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Although it is a poll, would you mind elaborating a little bit more?  Just curious since I've seen such strong support for it. -- Ned Scott 06:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: his one major contribution to wikipedia is Book of Shadows (Charmed). Zzzzz 23:37, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Pardon me? I've contributed to more than one article. As for my reasons, I reject the premise of the proposal entirely. Obviously, it has strong support, but I felt I should register my objection. —Mira 09:31, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I think the question was why do you reject it? DJ Clayworth 18:02, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Other

message: I've closed the poll, it's been running for a little over a week and the consensus in there indicates fairly strongly that people see this as being implemented first as a guideline, although there were a number of people who felt it could or should be upgraded to a policy were it to be disregarded.  For those keeping score, there were 18 confirmed votes, of which 16 saw it as being formalised and 2 rejected it. The majority is a strong consensus, and within that consensus 13 favoured guideline as a first step, again a strong consensus. Hiding Talk 13:24, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Closure
Talk:Niels Juel

message: Did he spell his name Juel or Iuel? I've seen both.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by SpookyMulder (talk • contribs) 
:In his day, "J" wasn't necessarily considered a separate letter in Danish, so Juel might very well have spelled his name with an "I", even more so as Danish didn't have an officially adopted spelling. However, after the spelling reforms of Rasmus Rask (c. 1820) this distinction was established. This was confirmed in the spelling reform of 1875, which became the foundation for the first official standard spelling adopted by government administration in 1892 (if I remember the year correctly). Any modern Dane would spell the name with a "J". Valentinian T / C 21:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK thanks for that. The 1906-21 Conways fighting ships says he spelt it "Iuel" (there's a ship named after him) but I'll leave it as J from now on. I assume it was pronounced "Jooel" and not "Yooel"? SpookyMulder 01:20, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps it was about time somebody began making soundfiles. Actually, the last version is closer to the Danish pronounciation. In Danish, "I" is pronounced like "ee" in "keen" and and "J" is pronounced like the "Y" in "York". A sound like the "G" in "George" is very rare in Danish, and almost exclusively used in words imported from English. To boil down one of Rasmus Rask's spelling reforms; if I or U belong to the same syllable as a second vowel, one of them shall be changed to a consonant (I -> J and U -> V). Since 1875, the orthography using "one vowel per syllable only" has been standard in Danish. In Juel's case, the syllables are Ju-el which is why the UE can be positioned next to each other, but not the IU. But the first syllable is identical to the first two letters in the English word "Yule". Valentinian T / C 10:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: As his brother Jens Juel is Baron of Jueling, and his great x3 grandson Carl Juel-Brockdorff is Baron of da:Scheelenborg, Niels should had a title of Lensbaron (eldest son of Baron and other brother get Baron) or he did not get a title and his grandson received another one? Matthew_hk tc 09:39, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Carl Juel-Brockdorff got the title through marriage may be.  Matthew_hk tc 10:10, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noble title
Talk:Carl Douglas

message: This article has been reverted to an earlier version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Text entered in   duplicated at least in part material from . Other content added by this contributor may have been copied from other sources and has been removed in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. Content added by other contributors subsequent to the introduction of this material can be restored if it does not merge with this text to create a derivative work. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. ----Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:31, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problem

message: I just changed the line that states that Carl resides in Los Angeles to now read that he resides in Hamburg, Germany.  The only references that I found for L.A. were clones of this wiki page, whereas Carl's own site and his Myspace page both list Hamburg as his location.
There was also a "specify" tag on the reference to the publishing company that he runs.  Carl's home page lists SMV as his publishing company, so I added the name to the text.  However, I couldn't find any evidence that he runs the company.  Carl's myspace page has the SMV page listed first amongst his friends, and likewise, the SMV myspace page has Carl listed first among it's friends.  On the "Contact" page on Carl's home page, it lists SMV as "Carl Douglas' Publishing Agency and responsible for all things Carl..." but to me that doesn't make it clear whether it means that this is the agency that publishes Carl's works, or it's the agency that he owns.
I should also point out that it doesn't look like Carl's home page has been updated since 2005, so the info could be out dated.Robman94 (talk) 17:48, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hamburg vs. Los Angeles 

message: Just checked out the listed website (carl-douglas.com) and going there just gives a locked Squarespace site that asks for a password. What's the approach on fixing it, if that's something we want to do for an external link? There are plenty of archive.org captures. Reconrabbit 05:35, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website no longer usable
Talk:Per Ledin

message: Couldn't resist to mention the wonderful girlfriend chant and BB's response.
The photo itself is copyrigthed so I linked to the original article article also serves as source).
Hdw 13:27, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Tip: Use the "Show preview" button intead of saving the page after every small edit you make. The history gets very cluttered up otherwise. I don't think the note about the wife's and girlfriend's response is worth mentioning in an encyclopedic article. --claes 20:29, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Godspell (1971 Off-Broadway Cast)

message: I moved this article from the title "Godspell (1971 Off-Off-Broadway Cast)" to the title "Godspell (1971 Off-Broadway Cast)". I realize that the album's listing in AllMusic.com calls it the "Off-Off-Broadway Cast", but that is incorrect. Godspell was off-off-Broadway when it played New York's Café La MaMa for a two-week run in early 1971. Two producers saw it, hired Stephen Schwartz to write a new score, and moved it to the Cherry Lane Theatre, which was — and is — an off-Broadway venue. In fact, the Cherry Lane is New York's oldest continuously running off-Broadway theater. — Walloon 06:17, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cherry Lane Theatre
Talk:Plain Old XML

message: It's not too evident in the article what's so interesting about POXs relation to XML Schema. 194.157.147.48 15:06, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POX - Schema

message: RDF has nothing to do with "multilayered XML". You have several syntax for RDF, like RDF/XML, but others exist as well like N3. -- 194.242.114.97 06:40, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: RDF - XML

message: "REST could be seen as POX over HTTP with some peculiarities."
REST can use other data formats than XML and doesn't necessarily have to be based on HTTP. --87.165.56.234 20:06, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POX vs REST 

message: I removed WP:MADEUP after adding links to three credible, unrelated sources (Microsoft Developer Network, Microformats.org, and the Java Spring Framework) all using the term "POX" in the same way.  Can add more if needed -- it's a fairly widely-used term in the XML community, and doesn't belong to any specific vendor (in fact, it's a hard thing for a vendor to sell, just like a POJO). David (talk) 22:12, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of WP:MADEUP
Talk:Peter Hore (prankster)

message: It looks like Peter Hore was cut and paste moved to Peter Hore (aka Peter Michael Howard).  Might need to get someone with suitable priviledges to fix it, if possible. -- Chuq 07:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, all fixed (hopefully).  Ironically the only edits User:Wikifixor ever made  needed fixing! -- Chuq 10:57, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am frankly dubious that his real name is Peter Michael Howard. It is far too close to "Howard, PM" to be accepted without a reference. He is only known as Peter Hore (or Hoare) as far as I know. Thepm (talk) 10:31, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page names 

message: Do we really need a list of stunts?  It verges on a celebration of his activities.--Jack Upland (talk) 03:32, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tagged that section as needing more secondary-source analysis. Lacking such coverage, most of the content should be removed, in my opinion. Wikipedia is not a newspaper or an exposition of every detail of a subject's life. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:44, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I'm not sure there is any analysis. This raises the question whether we should have the page.--Jack Upland (talk) 01:57, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed most of the trivial information and added some commentary by secondary sources. I agree that questions of notability remain. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 00:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stunts 

message: "19 September 2014: Peter Hore influenced security conditions at the funeral of Nicole Kidman's father. It is understood he may have astral travelled into the funeral, however his mental illness may have influenced this incident as it may have not occurred. He was known to be responsible for Nicole experiencing a slightly dramatic episode at the funeral.[citation needed]"
Erm...what?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.210.200.117 (talk) 09:49, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Funeral of Nicole Kidman's father 
Talk:Domesticated silver fox

message: Hello All,
*In 2005, this article was created with the name of "Domesticated silver fox" because it was this melanistic form of the red fox that was the subject of the "farm fox experiment" 
*In 2015, the article was moved to "Russian domesticated red fox" (see above), and so "Domesticated silver fox" became a redirect to it. (I assume some politics was played in this renaming, because the silver melanistic colour morph only occurs in North American red foxes, and those that have been imported from North America for fur-trading purposes i.e. Russia and Europe. The editing record shows that the proposer appears to have gained a username purely to achieve this move, then departed Wikipedia.)
*In 2017, the article was moved to "Domesticated red fox" (see above). I have spoken with the move proposer - he was not aware that the redirect "Domesticated silver fox" existed at that time.
I propose that the article be moved back to its original "Domesticated silver fox" to be more WP:PRECISE. I shall wait one week to receive editors views before initiating a formal move request. William Harristalk 10:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not only "Silver fox"?. In particular, the first sentence is wrong: The domesticated red fox is a form of the wild red fox (Vulpes vulpes) which has been domesticated to an extent under laboratory conditions. That's wrong. Silver fox is primarily a wild form of the red fox. See German Wikipedia: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silberfuchsfell (silver fox skin). -- Kürschner (talk) 12:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That is also a good idea. English Wikipedia has an article on the Silver fox (animal), which has a large section that links to this article. That article is only 30kb in size, and is nowhere near as well developed as on the German Wikipedia. Let us see what ideas others may have. William Harristalk 22:27, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

text: As I said in user talk, I think this article should move to Domesticated silver fox to be more WP:PRECISE, get its wording cleaned up, and then we merge the redundant WP:CONTENTFORK material in the other articles into this one, leaving behind only short WP:SUMMARY treatment with a  hatnote, in the other relevant articles.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  00:15, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed page move 

message: Institute of Cytology and Genetics in Novosibirsk, Siberia Infinitepeace (talk) 06:19, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: added location :  Institute of Cytology and Genetics in Novosibirsk, Siberia

message: "The collapse of the Soviet Union resulted in declining funds towards scientific research, complicating Belyayev's and Trut's research continuation. They had difficulties even keeping the foxes alive. Belyayev died in 1985 before he could salvage the institute"
"Salvage the Institute"?  What is this even supposed to mean?  The Soviet Union didn't collapse for better than half a decade after Belyayev's death.  Of course he couldn't salvage it from something that wouldn't even happen for years after his death. Nonmouse (talk) 15:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rescue Institute from collapse of the Soviet Union?
Talk:Ocean (comics)

message: *I think we need a citation.  That reference was not at all obvious to me as I was reading the series.  Is this something the writers noted somewhere? 24.60.255.188 (talk) 06:02, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: windows/doors