lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1852 United States presidential election

message: The VP nominees of the two major parties were both born in North Carolina. Wm. R.D. King served in Congress from the southeast part of the state 1811-1816. Wm A Graham was Fillmore's Secretary of the Navy and a former NC Governor (1845-1849). Chronicler3 20:43, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  North Carolina Connection 

message: Daniel Webster was the nominee of two different parties in 1852. After Scott won the nomination at the Whig Party National Convention, Fillmore's supporters started "Union" tickets of presidential electors. These Union Electors received votes in GA, MA, NY, and NC and possibly other states. In these four states, Webster received 6,995 votes. "Ohio Elects the President" (Mansfield OH: Bookmasters, Inc., 2000), p. 33. 
Webster was also nominated by the Native American Party at its national convention in Trenton on 7/5-6/1852. That party's Electors were pledged to him until his death on 10/24/1852 just before the election. The NAP national committee substituted Jacob Broome of PA for President on 10/27/1852. Broome received 2,566 votes. "Ohio Elects the President", op. cit., p. 33. Chronicler3 20:43, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daniel Webster Campaign 

message: Most of the others (1856, 1860) redirect like this; ie. Election of 1856, Election of 1860. How come this one doesn't?
"Election of 1852 = #redirect United States presidential election, 1852"
(68.14.143.194 06:01, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect from "Election of 1852" 

message: I am not sure why, but the elections results box is appearing at the bottom of the article page for United States presidential election in Massachusetts, 1852, United States presidential election in Vermont, 1852, and perhaps other state articles. Perhaps it needs to be formatted like United States presidential election in New Hampshire, 1852. All three of these pages were created by .–CaroleHenson (talk) 14:12, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello there, CaroleHenson. I am JCC the Alternate Historian, the creator of the 1852 US Presidential Election articles in Vermont, New Hampshire, and Massachusetts. I apologize for any inconveniences with those three articles! I tried fixing the Vermont one several times, but none of my edits worked. The New Hampshire article got screwed up as well, but a user named Mr.Election fixed it for me (I'll thank him for that when I get the chance, probably tomorrow). As for the Massachusetts article, it got screwed up like the Vermont article. CarikHenson, I see that you tried to fix the Massachusetts article, but ran into a similar problem as I did. Hopefully, either you, I, or someone else can fix the articles so that they aren't train wrecks. --JCC the Alternate Historian (talk) 20:40, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Election results appearing at the bottom of [[United States presidential election in Massachusetts, 1852]], etc.
Talk:George W. Grider

message: ... is very substandard as an encyclopedia article, and reads, as the person asking for its deletion stated, like a resumé.  I'll try to work on this a little.  Person is very enclopedic as he was both a World War II naval hero and a Member of Congress, albeit for only one term.  Rlquall 02:48, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Didn't need deletion, but ... 

message: Should this still be considered a stub?Rlquall 03:46, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unstub? 

message: The former Sixth Congressional district as then constituted and the one won by William Andrerson (naval officer) on the same day as Grider won the former Ninth can truly be said to be in "western Tennessee" (roughly the western half and defined as being west of Nashville) but was not in West Tennessee, a legal term of art describing that part of the state between the Mississippi River and the north-flowing (downstream) portion of the Tennessee River.  Rlquall 03:03, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Western Tennessee"

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 19:19, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Talk:Gábor A. Somorjai

message: On 28 Feb 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was keep.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Gabor A. Somorjai for a record of the discussion.
Am I allowed to mention that Gabor's expertise in the study of "clean surfaces"--surfaces in near-total vacuum, from which all the adhering gas and vapor have been removed--together with his near-totally bald head, earned him the affectionate nickname "Mr. Clean-Surface"?  I guess that would be original research, but it is true.  SingingZombie (talk) 03:50, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: from Vfd

message: An editor calling himself "5thDivision" (the username is still red) has stated, in the first sentence, that Professor Somorjai is "Swedish".  I suppose it's just barely possible that Gabor may have Swedish citizenship as he seems to have escaped the Holocaust by acquiring a Swedish passport before moving to USA, but this hypothesis (that he's a citizen of Sweden) is a very long-shot, not sourced, and certainly not important enough to place in the initial sentence.  Gabor was born in Hungary, and has an Hungarian accent stronger than Bela Lugosi's, and has been in USA for more than six decades!  So, much as I hate to not assume good faith, it seems overwhelmingly likely that calling him "Swedish" is vandalism.  So I'm taking it out.  If I'm wrong, by all means correct me and document, with a reliable source, that Gabor is in any sense Swedish.  
Best wishes, HandsomeMrToad (talk) 04:54, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Swedish"??? 
Talk:Eugene Skinner

message: Really? Would you mind linking to the guideline about it? What about the Kesey statue? What about Portlandia? Katr67 (talk) 19:29, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Without looking at the image pages for the other statues, if they say they are released by anyone other than the author of the sculpture, then they would be copyvios. If you change the author/info on the pic page for Skinner, it would probably qualify as fair use (provided a mention or something in the article about the statute). Here is the law, and here is the commons info. Wikipedia via Wikipedia:Freedom of panorama basically refers you to Commons. But in general, its a little understood/known copyright thing, which is why so many pictures of artwork are on Wikipedia under the wrong licenses. Of course, if it was commission by the Feds, then you still have gov work, along with sculpted pre-1923 (I think it might even be later as I believe protection such as this wasn't part of the 1909 Copyright Act). See also: . Hope that helps. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:01, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool, thanks, I'll look into it. I'm glad you're in law school. Better you than me, anyway... Katr67 (talk) 19:23, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sculpture image copyvio? 
Talk:Palanquin

message: Not a Wicktionary candidate. Certainly possible to have an article written about it as much as Sedan chair has. -- Solipsist 17:51, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: Image of traditional Indian palanquin added to the article
    Tux the penguin 10:10, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image Added
Talk:Montferrat

message: Monferrat and Monferrato are the same region, but I found two different articles, one related to the former, the second to the latter. In addition I would like to point out that the Montferrat (il Monferrato) was a marquisate in Piedmont, not Lombardy and its territory is nowadays comprised in the piemontese provinces of Asti and Alessandria. The term is still used to name the hilly region very well known for its famous wines.
Regards
Fixed the geographic things you mentioned, the duplicate articles appears to be fixed.  Also added some more data on the history of the marquessate and moved the stuff about William III to a separate article. Fleshed out the rulers list with some more info. 
Should the names be in Italian? It's a bit strange to have Italian nobles listed as 'William' and 'John'...
Havard 21:45, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

message: From a mobile device the flag can be seen very poorly, the white blends in with the white of the page. JacktheBrown (talk) 17:25, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem
Talk:American Protective League

message: The IWW is not anarchist, but neither is it a trade union, at least not according to some definitions. Wikipedia enforces trade union as a category, but trade unionism is often identified with craft unionism, and the IWW is an industrial union. Richard Myers 01:34, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identity of the IWW union 
Talk:Herodotus

message: I have removed the original research once again. Although I applaud the attempt at compromise by MinisterForBadTimes, the rules concerning WP:OR are strict and for very good reason. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. It is also not a democracy. There is no provision that allows the inclusion of original research based on any type of compromise. And the rule applies to history as well as the sciences as per Mr. Wales' statement here: .
The OR violations are these:
1.The improper use of a primary source. The foundation of this edit is a primary source. The rule states: 
The edit constitutes an interpretation not backed by any secondary source. The secondary sources provided only allude to the primary—they in no way endorse the statement. 
2. The use of an original translation where a published one exists. The rule is clear: "Where English translations of non-English material are unavailable, Wikipedia editors may supply their own." Since there is a translation published by tertullian.org which can be found here: , any original translation is not allowed.
This is enough to close the matter right here. But since I ordered the sources and have taken a careful look at them, I'll post my findings in the following section. My reason for doing this is to clearly separate and differentiate the two discussions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alcmaeonid (talk • contribs) 10:02, 6 Jul 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research 

message: Herodutos is the father of history.
history is find from a greek word historia which means search for knowledge  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 102.91.54.118 (talk) 21:42, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Herodutos 

message: Both the original and the "archived" links to Britannica consistently redirect me to the entry for Hippocrates, even though the url seems to correctly route to Herodotus. Does anyone know why this is happening or how to fix it? 76.76.25.11 (talk) 20:59, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Someone had changed the url target to Hippocrates. Schazjmd (talk) 21:04, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Britannica Redirect
Talk:Nuclear-powered icebreaker

message: That statement doesn't make any sense, that they can only cruise in the polar regions.  Even in the tropics, the seawater is several hundred degrees colder than the reactor, and seawater doesn't cool the reactor anyway, the production of steam does.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.230.223.17 (talk) 05:10, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like made up nonsense to me as well. At worst, it'll have to go at a slightly reduced power level. 78.60.253.249 (talk) 16:58, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  What possible difference would less than 30 degrees C of water temperature make compared to the energy used to boil it off? 24.127.38.138 (talk) 02:08, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I know I'm responding to an ancient discussion, but the sea water temperature limit is related to the dimensioning of sea water cooling system components such as heat exchangers. The older nuclear-powered icebreakers have such limitations, the newer ones (namely Project 22220, perhaps also Project 10510) do not. Tupsumato (talk) 13:16, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only in cold water
Talk:Enlightenment (software)

message: This article needs to be restructured to reflect the changes with Enlightenment. It seems DR16 and DR17 are now considered to be separate projects with different history and versioning schemes. 4.238.179.246 (talk) 19:22, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big changes with project. 

message: The current version of the article does not mention support for Wayland. Is it supported in 18? Is it due to be supported in 19?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.114.7.39 (talk) 09:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTU5ODg 192.114.7.39 (talk) 12:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wayland support 

message: * https://www.linuxinsider.com/story/80456.html
:: * Seemingly honest and neutral review
*  https://www.networkworld.com/article/2366932/opensource-subnet/the-desktop-a-week-review-enlightenment.html
:: * A review ... yet anthor with difficulties ... only SUSE tried.
* https://www.techradar.com/uk/news/software/applications/5-of-the-best-lightweight-window-managers-for-linux-972570
::* Techradar Review 2016 - compared with four others.
* Red Hat Linux 6.1: The Official Red Hat Linux Getting Started Guide, Chapter 11. The Enlightenment Window Manager ((R Hat - 2003 - Oct))
::* Haven't seen this but it ought be be substantial
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Djm-leighpark (talk • contribs) 21:33, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Added the first three but could not find the Red Hat one. Sorry it took five years :) Darcyisverycute (talk) 23:47, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Piano sonata

message: Quote: An important innovation was Franz Liszt's comprehensive "four-movements-in-one" form introducing the concept of thematic transformation.
Suggestion: as can be seen poss. from the fact that one of the next major works to make use of this form was not a piano sonata at all, but rather a chamber symphony (Schoenberg's), this idea and its elaboration might go under sonata form, not piano sonata?  Schissel : bowl listen 12:48, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
Answer: I agree (the Berg Sonata uses thematic transformation too, but maybe it is not so relevant to piano sonata). In an extended article on piano sonata though maybe the Liszt Sonata should be mentioned? Maybe also Chopin's Funeral March Sonata, and Scriabin and Prokofiev sonatas as major repertoire works? Rolf-Peter Wille
The 4-movement thematic cylce was the inspiration of Schubert - not Liszt. The Wanderer Fantasy predates the B Minor Sonata by about 30 years.
--AlkanSite 06:07, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liszt, etc. 

message: I've added headings for each of the standard "eras" (baroque, classical, romantic, modern).  Hopefully all of you can contribute something to one or each section.  I'm doing my part, but feel free to correct anything I write, as I am by no means an expert on the subject, merely an enthusiast. As of now, this is a major "work in progress" article.  Crabbyass 15:17, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the piano sonatas of Beethoven are divided into three periods, as are all of his works, you see.  Since some sonatas belong to his early period (the imitation period of Haydn, Mozart, etc.), they should be considered Classical.  But the sonatas that belong to the middle and late periods sound different and Romantic, so they should be considered Early Romantic.  Get my reasoning?  Marcus2 20:36, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Headings

message: OK, I've added a section on Famous Piano Sonatas and filled in what I could think of, but it seems a bit disproportionate to the rest of the article.  Perhaps this is because the article itself is so small.  Should this section be given it's own article, to be included in the List of solo piano pieces? Crabbyass 23:44, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous sonatas 

message: Shouldn't he be included?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeledi (talk • contribs) 12:15, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eric Satie
Talk:Testicle

message: in adults , each testies is oval in shape , with a length of about 4 to 5 cm and a width of about 2 to 3 cm. The testies is covered by a dense covering . Each testies.has about 250 compartments called testicular lobules . 2409:4051:28B:A949:AF91:69A4:5B45:D2B6 (talk) 03:40, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  testicular lobules 

message: I think it's weird that a reader would have to scroll all the way down to the Gallery section in order to find an actual image of testicles. I recommend we add one earlier in the article, perhaps even as the first image. Cereally8 (talk) 23:52, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real life photo 

message: 41.116.50.16 (talk) 03:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 03:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 April 2024
Talk:Saint Mary's Academy and College

message: I want to delete the entire mention of the "first cathedral west of the mississippi. 
I mean, Sonora in the 1700's, mexico city in the 1600's, St Louis in the 1820's, Galvaston in the 1840's.   This doesn't discount Bishop Miege's role, but still, I'm not sure this is the place for a long discussion of catholic episcopal history. Rick Boatright 20:28, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: to keep going about a detail like this one is totally irrelevant to the purpose of the article; better remove your post —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.42.168.109 (talk) 12:41, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  the cathedral issue 

message: I find irrelevant as well to say that the school does not have a seminary program. Of course it does not; it is a college, not a seminary. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.42.168.109 (talk) 12:44, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  the seminary issue
Category talk:Association football-related lists

message: For consistency, I moved this from Category:Association football related lists, since we're trying to avoid "association football" on wikipedia. --Dryazan 20:40, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you refer me to where this no "association football" policy is stated please? Joestynes 09:57, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Betsy Braddock

message: Alan Moore and Alan Davis are not her creators. Her first appearance, Captain Britain #8, was written by Chris Claremont and Herb Trimpe.--DrBat 20:43, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Creators

message: Are we sure Psylocke accurately registers as a Bisexual character, I am fully aware that she slept with the female version of Fantomex "Cluster", not necessarily make her bisexual. There are several types of people who have slept with a member of the same sex once and never do it again, I say this because technically Cluster is a woman she was a part of Fantomex who was a man to technically here being bisexual may not be accurate. I think that we should remove her status a bisexual unless she sleeps with another woman. God, comics can be confusing and they get more confusing with labeling a person's sexuality.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taw2541 (talk • contribs) 01:10, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The way the relationship with Cluster was depicted makes it hard to argue against her being bisexual. I agree that we want more canon confirmation since Cluster is a bit of a special case but that's at least as true for writing her as monosexually hetero. Jikybebna (talk) 12:13, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status as a Bisexual 

message: Betsy Braddock A.K.A “Psylocke” is only one played by actor “Olivia Munn” NickSummer08 (talk) 18:42, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psylocke
Wikipedia talk:Interwiki linking conflicts

message: I do not even see the problem: Interwiki connects two pages that treat more or less the same content. Of course there will be chains of links that will show enough drift to return to a different page for the original language. That's to be expected, and interwiki bots have to deal with that. Since such chains are not really different from chains that human intervention has declared to be drifting too much, I'd say a bot could add it to its skip-list itself, just as a human would do otherwise.   Aliter 01:25, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  One better
Talk:Flamen Dialis

message: Caesar was surely appointed Pontifex Maximus not Flamen Dialis; the lifetime restrictions on the Dialis would have made his subsequent career impossible. So removed.
Ceasar was appointed Flamen Dialis at an early age and later under Cornelius Sulla was removed from that position on the condition that no other Flamen Dialis be appointed until after his death. Ceasar was VOTED in as Pontifex Maximus, not appointed.
----
The information I added was from the page http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/secondary/SMIGRA*/Flamen.html, which is stated to be in the public domain. Burschik 10:45, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In such a case, with wholesale appropriation of unreedited text, an "External link' might be considered a minimal courtesy. --Wetman 16:59, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just wanted to comment that McCullough and Graves are NOT reliable scholarly sources. McCullough attempts to be accurate and often has interpretations of events and motives that are worth thinking about, but she is writing historical fiction, the narrative and psychological coherence of which requires selecting facts when a scholar would have to acknowledge conflicting data. Graves' book has been both justly criticized and unjustly maligned: it contains many mistaken ideas about Celtic myth, for instance, and should not be used as a reference. But Graves states his purpose in his subtitle: "A Historical Grammar of Poetic Myth." This is a work on poetics and myth, how the poet uses myth or the myth uses the poet, not a reference work. It illuminates how Graves and his peers thought about myth, but not to explain myth and religion in the specific historical setting of their originating cultures.  Cynwolfe (talk) 15:45, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: What in the world is a papal cardinal? Pope and cardinal are well known, but papal cardinal is a dark mystery. The link points to the article defining  cardinal, which does not contain the term papal cardinal, much less define it.
Donfbreed (talk) 00:05, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Undefined term

message: I’m highly inclined to slap a [source needed] on every unresourced list item, but I don’t have the wikiskillz to pay the bills and investigate specific page changes.
So, is any of this list credible and citable? UsersLikeYou (talk) 09:46, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Devious “restrictions” list