Talk:Inviscid flow

message: I started the page here, but it is just a stub.  It, at least, needs the equations describing inviscid flow (as most of the other flow articles have such equations).
MagiMaster 03:49, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Creation

message: Are (all and only) superfluids inviscid? Cesiumfrog (talk) 01:47, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  examples 

message: I'm new to fluid dynamics, and I have no idea most of the symbols in the article's equation mean. Could these be named/explained/linked to in the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.21.81.232 (talk) 10:42, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Equation variable explanation

message: Format and spacing of the article looks appealing, tone is appropriately encyclopedic, and there is a good amount of content on the page. Sources need to be cited for the entire "Applications" section, however. Also, I would suggest maybe adding a couple more images or graphics. Overall, good progress on the assignment; just need to focus on citing reliable sources/data and little aesthetic adjustments.Nlhw13 (talk) 07:16, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review 

message: -Good amount of info and great buildup of the equations!
-The actual writing has a few too many "unnecessary" words, such as "simply" in the first sentence, or this sentence: "Though only a small number of true inviscid fluids have been discovered, known as superfluids, inviscid flow has great significance in fluid dynamics."
-The equations themselves are given too much importance in the article. Link to the page for Reynolds Number rather than give a paragraph explanation of it.
-The "solid boundaries" section is written well, but should be somehow linked to inviscid flow within the section.
-An image would be great in the "applications" section.
-The use of "He" in the applications section is a bit obscure and doesn't read well, maybe it change to "helium".
The most important of the changes I'd suggest is removing focus from the Reynolds Number and the Navier Stokes equations (as mentioned above).
BlakeC90 (talk) 04:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review 

message: Overall, the article looks appealing to me. I like the part of including conventional units. However, try to write them appropriately like m^3. My suggestion is to make a table to include both SI and English units.
Also I do not know if mentioning Reynolds number here is a good thing or not as you demonstrated great ability to use hyperlink. Reynolds number is popular in fluid mechanics so I'm sure it has its own article.
In the description of Euler equations, the unit for pressure should be in standard as we all know Pa = kg/ms^2. 
Great job at introducing applications.
Huywilliam (talk) 05:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review 

message: The article does a good job in the lead section defining the subject and summarizing the information in the rest of the article. I appreciated the real world examples given in the applications section. The article also does a good job explaining relevant equations and connecting them to the topic. The examples about the situations when viscous forces can be assumed negligible for real life applications were useful. One change that could be made is making the sub topics exist independently so the article reads less like an essay. For instance, remove the word "later" from the first sentence of the Navier Stokes equations section.
I also think the Reynolds Number is not the best section to begin with in the body. A more detailed description of the topic or the applications would be helpful and make people more likely to continue reading the article. The applications section can be broken up into subtopics. The examples and definitions about inviscid flow are applicable to my article. An important part about entrance length is the inviscid core that exists in the entrance region. The core is important for wind tunnel design, to avoid turbulence around the test model. Good article!
Krbuw (talk) 06:38, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review 

message: "Cooling to these temperatures, with this fluid, is a very expensive system and there are few compared to other cooling systems" there are few, what? Is this english? 46.15.71.108 (talk) 20:00, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that this sentence is difficult to unravel. Thanks for drawing it to our attention. I have edited the offending sentence; hopefully it is now more easily comprehended; and hopefully it still reflects what is said in the cited source! Dolphin (t) 08:54, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this sentence want to say?