lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:USS A. Houghton

message: Replaced old blue infobox with ship infobox, expanded text significantly based on DANFS, added intro paragraphs, See Also, links, refs, cat, etc.
No photo seen at DANFS on this vessel...Wikited (talk) 15:17, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgraded page 

message: This ship was decommissioned on 3 june 1865 (DANFS) not 9 ?! Conforoa (talk) 23:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 or 9
Talk:Queensland Day

message: Hello, Professor Sanders link goes to M.Shadows page, probably should be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.139.115.142 (talk) 22:38, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing this out. Done. Graham87 00:53, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matthew Sanders 
Talk:AllAfrica

message: I propose the speedy delete to be taken away. It is claimed that the article is spam. I don't think it is, but not only that the article is sufficiently notable to be included. See Alexa data. It does need references, sourcing, wikifying etc but not deletion. --Javit 01:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Notability As best as I can tell, this site does not meet notability guidelines. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 01:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have now provided external sources per WP:Notability (web), which makes me remove the speedy delete. You can take it to AfD if you like, but my opinion is that it wouldn't be constructive. Best thing is to improve the article's subject matter. --Javit 01:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense These are some pretty credible sources; full speed ahead, as far as I'm concerned. As an aside, might it be wiser to have an article on the parent company and mention the web site? Is this site ever really going to justify its own article? -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 03:30, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy Delete Hold on
Talk:Kitzbühel

message: I don't see why the private resort is notable enough to include in the article; we don't tell about its history (did Max Planck stay there back in the old days when it was a luxury hotel? Did Louis Armstrong?) or about its architectural significance (is it a landmark example of the Jugendstil?) or about its cultural prominence (was it the setting for a novel by Thomas Mann or a film by Alfred Hitchcock? Did Marlene Dietrich sing a song that alluded to it?) As it stands, our mention of a "world-class" resort that isn't actually open to the public reads more like a plug for the corporation that owns it. Especially with the link to the company.
65.213.77.129 (talk) 13:46, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:USS Abele

message: I used two other sites besides DANFS to find the Specifications for this ship. For some reason DANFS has the wrong specs and wrong class listed. Maybe these specs are correct for the other class ship. Please don't change specs without further references that prove the other two sites wrong.Pennsy22 (talk) 09:25, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  DANFS Specifications
Talk:USS Algonquin (tug)

message: The "(Tug)" could be a date, but which year? A number of these little vessels seem to have the Navy's commission date rather than launch date. That would probably be 1891 as the tug was completed 20 May, certainly seven years before the "Navy date" so, for the meantime (Tug) works as this was the only tug of the name. Palmeira (talk) 02:55, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Algonquin (Tug)
Talk:Yahoo! News

message: Yahoo News now also do high-level original investigation, like on Julian Assange CIA at-least kidnapping plans and Borders Unit spying on some journalists. Information on what journalists are there in Yahoo News would also be welcomed. Edit: some info is in there but incomplete. Tech-ScienceAddict (talk) 08:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Small 144.48.133.194 (talk) 14:19, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed 

message: Google news is inundating me with articles about food.
I do not do food 131.150.69.179 (talk) 00:19, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  no more food
Talk:USS Mississinewa (AO-59)

message: I just received a donated photo, :File:USS Mississinewa (AO-59) burning.jpg which I tacked on to the bottom of the article. Regular editors may want to consider a better location, and might want to see if the graphics lab would consider cropping and otherwise enhancing.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 22:11, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New photo
Talk:USS Hughes

message: . If it says that, it is wrong. My father was the engineering officer on the Hughes when it was hit and responsible ultimately for preventing it's loss.He removed the plate from the wreckage of the plane that hit them and had it encased in perspex with the date on it. It sits on our mantle shelf.I can easily supply a picture when I am back home.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.23.205.60 (talk • contribs) 
:Your entire comment did not make it into this page. I removed the identification of the aircraft from the main article because two sources disagreed and DANFS does not specify the type. As for the artifact, unless it's authenticated and/or in a museum or published article, it can't be used to prove or disprove anything. It's interesting, but you understand that wikipedia can't use an unpublished 1st or 2nd hand account of events as evidence. It needs to be published by a reliable third party. Please see WP:RS for information on reliable sources. --Dual Freq (talk) 00:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Attack
File talk:Semen2.jpg

message: Believe it or not, semen is a natural part of the human body. Shocking, I know.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.174.110.227 (talk) 23:36, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: lol, masturbationalographistology!
This photo pretty much sums up why Wikipedia is a joke; keep on truckin', guys.  Casey J. Morris 19:17, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

message: I thought it looked like Satan reaching for the Heavens.  F'n great!!!!  I'd kill to know what you blew that on.... is that a couch?  Looks like a cheap one.... Wjmummert (KA-BOOOOM!!!!) 18:55, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: LOL

message: I doubt greatly that whoever uploaded this pic had the intentions of making Wikipedia a better place. In short terms, it's supposed to be vandalism. How do people not realize that. Stop being immature on this page, as a matter of fact, delete this pic along with it. If anyone with half a brain saw this they could tell it was a joke, and I bad one at that. So delete it.74.73.142.163 (talk) 20:54, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really? 

message: Haha, I bet the guy taking this picture was jacking off lol.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.237.236.232 (talk) 02:42, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be removed at once. There are far too many users uploading pictures of themselves masturbating or pictures of their semen as some kind of self-gratifying display. How on earth does this self-indulgent nonsense enrich the project? It's because of things like this that Wikipedia will forever be regarded as a joke. 212.139.68.178 (talk) 06:44, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Have fun taking this picture? 

message: I have proposed this image for deletion, based on what I have read on this talk page, and the general character of the image, I do not feel that it upholds the standards of what wikipedia is, and is not an encyclopedic image.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Teamcoltra (talk • contribs) 07:44, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:It's a Laugh Productions

message: :It's A Laugh Productions was formed in 2005. Therefore, it could not have been producing That's So Raven in 2003-2004. I changed this, and it was considered vandalism. HARDLY.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.118.200.158 (talk) 23:24, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Or the company was formed in 2003. A more useful way to improve the article would be to resolve the discrepancy, not just change things with no explanation. Everything in this article is unreferenced. It would be nice to have some references to back up the facts stated. --NrDg 23:48, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TSR 

message: Just wanted to be clear  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.42.125 (talk) 18:18, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has ''Cory in the House'' Officially been canceled? 

message: The "History" section of the article contains this statement: "It' s a Laugh Productions is unofficially owned by Disney."
What is that supposed to mean? Either it's owned by Disney or it's not.--Pat Berry (talk) 04:18, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unofficially owned? 

message: Disney XD has anounced the show's cancellation, but the final episode of I'm in the Band has not aired yet. And yet people are still putting "Band" in the "past" or "cancelled" section, and simply adding "Yet to end" or "Still airing" after it. Could somebody please fix it? Shoesquashfan5000 (talk) 17:46, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm in the Band 

message: It is really debatable as to whether It's a Laugh Productions produced any of the theatrically-released/made-for-TV movies based on Disney Channel's original series; Disney Channel does not include the It's a Laugh vanity plate at the end of any of the made-for-TV films based off of its original series, nor does the company have any sort of byline in the credits of any of the films. Therefore, it would seem that It's a Laugh only has a hand in the production of Disney Channel/Disney XD original series and not the movies based of those series. TVtonightOKC (talk) 02:41, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movies 

message: Is it a good idea for a filmography guide to be created? It is swelling up really slowly in its 13 year lifespan. Actually 15 if its foundation date of November 3 2003. 
But they produced four movies one of them being a theatrical release. So I guess this may be taken as a big yes. 
Meanwhile, Schneider's Bakery its rival for Nick produced less sitcoms. It's filmography is too small. 
Please let someone respond about this suggestion. 
Good night, 
67.81.163.178 (talk) 03:54, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Outside of not following WP:ACCESS properly, I don't see any particular problem with the table (it's not exactly a "Filmography" table...) at this article... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 23:27, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dissected Filmography
Talk:Kufstein Fortress

message: Article reassessed and graded as stub. --dashiellx (talk) 19:15, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Should the "Heldenorgel" be mentioned? I think, as largest open air organ it has some relevance.
My English is probably not good enough to write a paragraph about it.
Some links (German): https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orgel_der_Festung_Kufstein http://www.festung.kufstein.at/de/heldenorgel.html 88.64.212.178 (talk) 12:52, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organ 

message: Another notable political prisoner that died here is Ivan Antun Zrinski, the last Zrinski.  He died in 1703.
https://www.arcanum.com/hu/online-kiadvanyok/Lexikonok-a-pallas-nagy-lexikona-2/z-1BAA0/zrinyi-1BD4F/
A szerencsétlen szülők egyetlen fiát, János Antalt nevétől is megfosztották és Gnade Antal néven katonának besorozták, mig 1683. minden alap nélkül ráfogván, hogy a király élete ellen tör, Rattenburg tiroli várban, utóbb Kufsteinban börtönbe vetették, hol husz évig sínylett és mint őrült ötven éves korában 1703. meghalt. 
 ... he was imprisoned in the Tyrolean castle of Rattenburg, later in Kufstein, where he languished for twenty years and like a madman for fifty died at the age of 1703. 104.158.48.139 (talk) 19:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ivan Antun Zrinski
Talk:Robley D. Evans (admiral)

message: Added miltiary infobox and populated box; added intro paragraph; Wikified page after fixing links, cat, etc.; added para on Board of Inspeciton and Survey; overall cleanup and Wikified page, which appears in good order now.Wikited (talk) 00:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgraded page 

message: I'm pretty sure this is the guy who wrote "A Sailor's Log", copyrighted in 1901, now out of copyright; it appears that the book had a 1910 sequel ("An Admiral's Log"). So how come that wasn't mentioned?  —  Rickyrab | Talk 15:38, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, these are his autobiographies - very good books too. Why are they not mentioned in this article? why, this is wikipedia and it is basically the equivalent of a report written by a team of 8th graders....  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.48.162 (talk) 12:29, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Sailor's Log 

message: Was recently at the Fort Douglas Museum in Salt Lake City and saw a very nice bronze bust of Adm. Evans on display. Did a quick google search and see (https://learninglab.si.edu/resources/view/302856) that another example is at the USNA - as I don't recall seeing their example, I don't know where it might be sitting on campus. Evans was nominated to attend the academy from Utah so that explains perhaps why they have a bust (although you wouldn't know why as there is no information in their museum, he's just quietly sitting off in a corner of the gallery). Does anyone know of other examples?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.48.162 (talk) 12:42, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robley Evans Bust
Talk:George Bruns

message: hi i like breads  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.126.83.165 (talk) 20:43, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  cats 

message: Bruns is known for his "Nation on Wheels," which appeared in the 1958 Disneyland TV show segment, "Magic Highway," which was also later used as travel music aboard the monorails at Disney theme parks. Bill S. (talk) 20:58, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disney work before Sleeping Beauty 

message: "He received his fourth, final and only nomination for Best Original Song for the track "Love" from Robin Hood."
Fourth and only? WTF does that mean? 73.60.212.174 (talk) 20:26, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  sentence makes no sense
Talk:Expo 67 pavilions

message: Started this article as the main Expo 67 article is becoming too long.--Abebenjoe 01:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Length
Talk:Abrasive saw

message: A miter saw is a woodworking tool that uses a toothed blade.
An abrasive saw is a metalworking tool that uses an abrasive disc.
Two entirely different machines.
Don't nominate pages for deletion unless you know what you're talking about, k?
Gomer Bolstrood 02:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No need to make personal attacks.  This article does not read like an encyclopedia entry, but more of a manual on how to use this particular saw.  Useight 03:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: She demonstrably has no knowledge of this topic. That's not a "personal attack". It's simply a fact. Also, perhaps she might want to wait more than four minutes before flagging a brand-new article with some poorly-written vandalbot.Gomer Bolstrood 03:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I nominated the article for deletion because it said that it could also be called a "chop saw". I checked for an article on the chop saw, as it seemed like a likely topic to already have an article, and was lead to the miter saw page. As both saws were said to be alternate names for the chop saw, I assumed it was the same thing. At the time you had not added the distinction to the article, so it was an honest mistake. In any case, you seem to be confused about the purpose of the programme I used to tag the article. It isn't a vandalbot, it's a programme that automatically detects newly-created article, so I don't see the point in blaming it. Finally, what you wrote here as well as what you wrote on my user talk page do count as personal attacks, albeit relatively mild ones. Please be civil from now on if you wish to contest another user's edits to an article. --DearPrudence 04:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to use your new toy responsibly, especially when dealing with topics on which you have limited personal knowledge. Maybe in a case like this you should read the older article completely and compare it to the new one, rather than simply "assuming it's the same thing"? Gomer Bolstrood 04:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not suggesting it's the same thing anymore, and in fact have no problem with the article now. When I first saw it, however, it was implied that it was the same thing as a chop saw. I read part of the other article (miter saw) and from what I could see it was similar enough to be the same thing. I apologise for my mistake, but please don't condescend to me for it - not everyone knows as much about saws as you, and I use the New Page Watcher as responsibly as I can. --DearPrudence 04:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Then how about removing the tag you placed, since you admit that it was a mistake? Gomer Bolstrood 04:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry - I'd forgotten to. It has been removed now. --DearPrudence 04:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Steel cut off saw is an article about the exact same topic that is orphaned. --Wizard191 (talk) 17:57, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge from [[steel cut off saw]]
Talk:Guinea Pig Club

message: Judging by the rhyming scheme, I don't think the word in the anthem should be "ears"!  Was this bowdlerised version the official published one?  I'm sure it wasn't what they actually sang.  Rodparkes 01:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering the same thing. intooblv (talk) 19:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording of Anthem

message: I once met a member of this club, and he referred to it as the "Flying Guinea Pig Club", no doubt due to the fact that all members were ex-pilots or air crew. He had a badge on his tie, and it was a Guinea Pig with wings. http://www.airmuseum.ca/mag/031025h2.gif based on the "wings" a pilot got. 
I am sure the club is correctly named in the article, but I think their "flying Guinea Pig" emblem deserves inclusion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.42.115.51 (talk) 03:33, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Name/Emblem

message: Does anyone know for certain that the club still "regularly meets"? The last I heard of it was in about 2005, when it seemed to be being wound down because of the aging membership. There can't be many members under 90 by now. GrindtXX (talk) 22:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Regularly meets"? 
Talk:USS Mugford (DD-389)

message: In this link, the Navy shows that the Mugford was equipped with 16 21-inch tubes. The article mentions 12. See http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/images/n110000/n116832c.htm for a visual of the 16 tubes on the Mugford. Additionally the Wiki article on Bagley Class Destroyers (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bagley_class_destroyer) states 16 tubes. Is this sufficient evidence to change this article? Eagletree (talk) 20:59, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Talk:List of jazz vocalists

message: The link to "Allan Harris" goes to a footballer, not a jazz singer.Arnold Rothstein1921 (talk) 21:40, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to wrong article 

message: *Anita Wardell (website) Please copy/paste add to list. Her name is shown elsewhere in Wikipedia, although there's no article yet.SignedJohnsonL623 (talk) 09:34, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Shocking! She's a genius. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 14:44, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've started her article. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 14:56, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anita Wardell
Talk:USS Decatur (DD-5)

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:57, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chester_W._Nimitz
Above article mentions that Nimitz ran the Decatur aground and was court martialed for it.  No mention of that incident here and it seems like there should be some mention of it.Jonny Quick (talk) 04:21, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Been over a year since the above comment, but I have added the incident. :) Safiel (talk) 14:13, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incident with Nimitz running Decatur aground
Talk:Melodic Intonation Therapy

message: I do not agree with the part in the history section claiming:  "there have not been many studies published that can truly support the effectiveness of MIT (Carroll 1996:12)". Melodic Intonation Therapy has proved to be effective in "well selected" aphasic patients with Broca's aphasia specially suffering from apraxia of speech. There is evidence from at least 8 languages including English, German, Dutch, French, Persian, Arabic, Romanian and Japanese to my knowledge. I will add the references soon. MIT is probably the only language therapy method that has undergone a clinical trial.
"MIT is probably the only language therapy method that has undergone a clinical trial." What utter rubbish. Clearly you have no idea about the field. There are quite literally hundreds if not thousands of clinical trials on language treatments for aphasia, including many many RCTs. Girabbit85 (talk) 03:15, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Cheetah Preservation Foundation

message: What is the Cheetah Conservation Foundation?  Should this be the Cheetah Conservation Fund?
Wizzyliz 02:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:USS Rathburne (DD-113)

message: Two ships, USS Rathburne, were named for him.  Although his name was spelled Rathburne or Rathbourne in official records, including the two warships named after him, this was an error. His name was Rathbun. --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:07, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Namesake
Category talk:Unreleased works by medium

message: Do this category and its subcategories properly include works that were originally withdrawn from publication but did eventually see print (possibly in altered form or at the hands of another publisher)? Also, does it include works that technically were published but then quickly withdrawn/recalled by the publisher?
The examples I have in mind are musical ones - I was thinking of making a subcategory for sound recordings. InnocuousPseudonym 02:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Definitional question

message: This newly created Category is the result of merging two poorly-named former categories --  &  -- adopting the name I proposed in a CFD discussion. A good deal of cleanup of the contents remains to be done. Cgingold (talk) 12:41, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note re new, renamed Category
Talk:Vorarlberg

message: What is being talked about here?  There were never any bishops headquartered in the Vorarlberg; I would assume the territory was under the spiritual authority of the Bishop of Chur, or one of the other surrounding bishops.  Where is this coming from? john k (talk) 02:15, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bishoprics? 

message: The article forgets to mention the old presence Romanch ethnic group withnessed by many toponyms: Fontanella, Faschina, Formarin, Gallina, Trisanna, Silvretta, Damuls, Valluga.--Deguef (talk) 20:02, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: What about the Romanch ethnic group?

message: Starting point can't be at 5500 meters altitude 82.192.229.155 (talk) 20:07, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  White ring
Talk:USS Crowninshield

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:49, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Talk:USS Boggs

message: Because this is an article about an American ship, I think the dates should be notated as [month] [dd], [yyyy]. For example, 23 September 1918 would become September 23, 1918, and I will change all these instances to such. Blippy1998 (talk) 20:14, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  American date format