lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pandalam

message: The section 'Places to visit' has been restored. It is stated in the beginning of the article that the place Pandalam is famous as a holy town. So, natuarally the temples, churches and mosques draw attention. This section is needed for that matter. The large number of devotional places gives an explanation to the question 'why it is a holy town'. -- Sreejith Kumar (talk) 11:26, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoration of 'Places to visit' 

message: It is observed that in the "Famous people" section, names of people who are not famous are included. On removal, such names are observed to be inserted again. This is vandalism. Please understand that Wikipedia is not a place for self promotion. -- SreejithInfo (talk) 06:08, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous people 

message: Pandalam hosts a lot of educational institutions which includes pre-schools to engineering colleges to medical colleges to arts/science colleges to ayurvedic colleges. That's not all. The place hosts 20+ hospitals and 30+ temples/churches/mosques. What is the point in listing them in the article? Or what is the point in listing just one among them (for eg, a section on colleges alone)? -- Xrie (talk) 06:01, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: @, a statement There are seven colleges and 23 schools at Pandalam, including N. S. S. College, Pandalam. is already given in the article which mentions the most well-known educational institution and gives an internal reference to it. I am native of the place and I don't think there is a need for a separate section. If you agree, we can keep this at that. -- Xrie (talk) 06:13, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Institutions 
Talk:Mexican hornshark

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 00:08, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Stokes Croft

message: The voice of this article is a little strange: could do with some tidying up of the syntax  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.174.218.229 (talk) 02:00, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing style 

message: Nothing on the recent events of Tesco's protests?
It was reported internationally in news media so there should definitely be at least a note on it.
85.225.87.211 (talk) 02:22, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent events 
Talk:Femoral canal

message: Hello. 
I am a member of WikiProject Anatomy, a Wikipedia wide project that maintains and improves articles that fall under the scope of anatomy. Since your article has fallen under our scope, I have placed the correct templates on this talk page for verification. Upon review of this article, I'd like to make a few points, as shown:
*Assess articles with class and importance factors
*Removed from WP:MED. Does not fall under scope, they do not cover anatomy topics unless it is in a disease/condition, ect.
I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! Renaissancee (talk) 04:13, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Assessment for [[WP:ANATOMY|WikiProject Anatomy]]
Talk:Femoral ring

message: Hello. 
I am a member of WikiProject Anatomy, a Wikipedia wide project that maintains and improves articles that fall under the scope of anatomy. Since your article has fallen under our scope, I have placed the correct templates on this talk page for verification. Upon review of this article, I'd like to make a few points, as shown:
*Assess articles with class and importance factors
*Removed from WP:MED, they do not cover anatomy topics
I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! Renaissancee (talk) 04:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Assessment for [[WP:ANATOMY|WikiProject Anatomy]]
Talk:Femoral sheath

message: Hello. 
I am a member of WikiProject Anatomy, a Wikipedia wide project that maintains and improves articles that fall under the scope of anatomy. Since your article has fallen under our scope, I have placed the correct templates on this talk page for verification. Upon review of this article, I'd like to make a few points, as shown:
*Assess articles with class and importance factors
*Removed WP:MED, WPMED does not cover anatomy topics
I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! Renaissancee (talk) 04:21, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Assessment for [[WP:ANATOMY|WikiProject Anatomy]]
Talk:Femoral triangle

message: As per Wikipedia:MEDMOS, I think the section about the mnemonics should be removed. What do you think? Em Mitchell (talk) 16:21, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mnemonics

message: Hello. 
I am a member of WikiProject Anatomy, a Wikipedia wide project that maintains and improves articles that fall under the scope of anatomy. Since your article has fallen under our scope, I have placed the correct templates on this talk page for verification. Upon review of this article, I'd like to make a few points, as shown:
*Assess articles with class and importance factors
*Removed mnemonics, they should not be in articles
*WPMED does not cover anatomy topics
I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! Renaissancee (talk) 04:20, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Assessment for [[WP:ANATOMY|WikiProject Anatomy]]

message: This link which informs the reader "Wikimedia Commons has media related to Femoral triangle". Nice? When I click it I get to a page on Commons that says "Showing results for federal triangle. Search instead for Femoral triangle." If that weren't bad enough, when I click on that second link, I get "There were no results matching the query." It makes the reader feel like it was April Fools Day. Could we improve, remove or disable the unhelpful Commons link? --Neitram (talk) 14:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons link
Talk:Fascia lata

message: The first sentence in the second section reads:
"It is an investment for the whole of the thigh, but varies in thickness in different parts."
I've seen the phrases "fibrous investment" and "fibrous expansion" in a few human anatomy articles. Do these phrases mean the same thing? Is "investment" a current term in the field of anatomy, or is it obsolete and therefore only appears in Wikipedia as a legacy from Gray's Anatomy's public domain text?
Sorry that I only have the wherewithal to pose these questions and not to research them or expand this article. BTW, the opening section of this article needs expansion, and afterward, if the sentence I quoted remains where it is, the pronoun "It" should be replaced with "Fascia lata," because having the antecedent for a pronoun in a separate section is awkward and confusing. 
I appreciate any help you can give. I'll try to get more help by adding a link to this discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anatomy. Thanks, --Geekdiva (talk) 09:00, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does the term "investment" mean in this anatomy article and others? 
Talk:Iliotibial tract

message: says that overpronation was once suspected as a factor in ITBFS but that this has been debunked. I noticed here in the article it is still listed as a risk-factor.
Thoughts?  Koyae (talk) 10:31, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overpronation as a factor 

message: needs picture of insertion point on tibia. Tkjazzer 22:55, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs 

message: "rom its attachment to the iliac crest it passes down over the Glutæus medius to the upper border of the Glutæus maximus, where it splits into two layers, one passing superficial to and the other beneath this muscle; at the lower border of the muscle the two layers reunite.
Laterally, the fascia lata receives the greater part of the tendon of insertion of the Glutæus maximus, and becomes proportionately thickened.
The portion of the fascia lata attached to the front part of the iliac crest, and corresponding to the origin of the Tensor fasciæ latæ, extends down the lateral side of the thigh as two layers, one superficial to and the other beneath this muscle; at the lower end of the muscle these two layers unite and form a strong band, having first received the insertion of the muscle.
This band is continued downward, under the name of the iliotibial band (tractus iliotibialis) and is attached to the lateral condyle of the tibia."
-----
a section from the fascia lata article that needs to be incorporated in to this article but needs rewording. Tkjazzer 22:58, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: need to include in this article

message: What is the iliotibial tract?  Is it a muscle, tendon, bone, joint, ...?  Could someone add this information?  Thanks!  Grover cleveland 21:50, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition needed

message: The links at the bottom don't go anywhere.
Darktaco (talk) 00:00, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Outdated links

message: I'd suggest someone who know what they're doing (i.e., not me) put some of the symptoms of ITBS on here, or at least a link to them. We are not given any real definition of what ITBS is, other than that runners and people with compromised gaits seem to get it. Does the IT band tighten? Does this impede leg movement? What's the pain associated? Even though there is a separate article for this, I think a few words ("Iliotibial Band Syndrome, a tightening of the IT Band, occurs in___" for example). 139.147.104.90 (talk) 20:30, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Symptoms of ITBS

message: Hello. 
I am a member of WikiProject Anatomy, a Wikipedia wide project that maintains and improves articles that fall under the scope of anatomy. Since your article has fallen under our scope, I have placed the correct templates on this talk page for verification. Upon review of this article, I'd like to make a few points, as shown:
*Assess articles with class and importance factors
*WP:MED does not cover anatomy, tag removed
I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! Renaissancee (talk) 21:33, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Assessment for [[WP:ANATOMY|WikiProject Anatomy]]
Talk:Trade dress

message: In view of the recent developments in trading and commercial practices and to give effect to important judicial pronouncements, a need for simplification and harmonization of trademark management systems was felt. 
this is too vague. the reader cannot guess what the recent devlopments or judicial pronouncements are. Further, developments may not be 'recent' as a new law was passed in 1999, as noted in the article. 
sandy 11:09, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Devlopments

message: It may be worthwhile to have another subheading or section that contrasts trade dress protection to the protections afforded with design patents and copyrights. There's a broad comparison section on the Trademark page, but addressing design patents in particular (as well as mentioning copyright) would highlight the subtle differences as well as the confusing overlap of these three IP regimes. Arttechlaw (talk) 07:54, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Section - Other IP?
Talk:Yatra (2006 film)

message: The album cover photo was deleted due to copyright violation. No one took the warning serious. User:Aung Phyoe simply deleted the warning from the article page and failed to do anything about the problem. The warning place on her user page was also ignored. The following warning on the image page was also ignored:

Please do not ignore Wikipedia rules regarding use of images! Dbiel (Talk) 05:32, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation
Talk:Fibular retinacula

message: The fibular retinacula (also known as peroneal retinacula) are fibrous retaining bands that bind down the tendons of the fibularis longus and fibularis brevis muscles as they run across the side of the ankle 223.25.25.190 (talk) 00:27, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The fibular retinacula (also known as peroneal retinacula) are fibrous retaining bands that bind down the tendons of the fibularis longus and fibularis brevis muscles as they run across the side of the ankle
Talk:The Encyclopedia of Life

message: This article is produce by the merging of 2 entries : 
* Former The Encyclopedia of Life aricle : see article "The Encyclopedia of Life"  before merging
* Former Encyclopedia of Life article : see archive The Encyclopedia of Life/Copy merged
The merging was done into the biggest article. If need, feel free to move "The Encyclopedia of Life" to "Encyclopedia of Life" (this will first need to delete the redirection page "The Encyclopedia of Life aricle").
Yug (talk) 12:20, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Body contouring

message: I know several surgeons -- with whom I have no connection -- who would be willing to sign over an excellent before-and-after picture of a body shaping patient if they could have a photo credit that links back to their website. What is the policy on that?Charles.Downey 20:25, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As long as they are happy to freely and completely release the image for any use (not just Wikipedia's), yes, that's fine - Wikipedia's GFDL requirement provides for this, an ensures that attribution is retained (although not rights). Proto 10:33, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: before and after photos

message: Some people claim that unnatural methods of losing weight cause abnormal body fat/lean mass composition.  They say that a person who loses additional fat rather than lean muscle mass such that they get to low body fat percentages would lose the excess skin.  Is this possible, has it been studied (obviously there is less ability to make money from people naturally regenerating then making them believe they have to have even more surgery), and if so why is there no section on alternatives? 69.252.158.32 00:12, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since I know of no link between loss of fat or muscle and loss of skin, and since I know of no reason why skin would react differently to loss of muscle rather than fat as long as the human in question were losing the same volume of body matter, I call utter and total horsecrap until someone cites some credible evidence. If I lose 90 CCs of body volume, I expect there to be 90 CCs of space lost and deflated as far as my skin is concerned. Whether the lost volume comes from fat or muscle makes no difference, and it is ridiculous to claim otherwise. Succubus MacAstaroth (talk) 12:46, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about natural skin regeneration? 

message: The first sentence of this article is "Body contouring is a general term that refers to any surgical procedure that alters different areas of the body, whether it is in a massive weight loss patient or not."  I just thought I should point that out.  MrBook (talk) 06:15, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Encyclopedia writing as message board argument

message: I added three recent (2014) journal articles to the further reading section that could be used as references to improve the article. - - MrBill3 (talk) 19:13, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible references added 

message: This page is a mess for the reasons I just listed. I suggest removing the unsourced material and adding a few references. I will be doing that as I have time. Juliet Sabine (talk) 04:03, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced, promotional, misleading article
Talk:Flag of Sint Maarten

message: Although the government indeed uses the flag with the arms with a red bordure, it should be an orange bordure. The decree regarding the flag can be found here https://lokaleregelgeving.overheid.nl/CVDR206068/1 and refers to the coat of arms. Which according to the island decree of 1982 shows an orange bordure (https://www.heraldry-wiki.com/heraldrywiki/index.php?title=Sint_Maarten_(eiland)#National_arms_of_Sint_Maarten)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A466:F20E:1:E0D2:504B:D65E:7822 (talk) 14:54, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong colours
Talk:G.I. Joe: America's Movable Fighting Man

message: All info presented comes from the various reference books listed. As with the Action Man page, I will start to add additional footnotes, if that is deemed necessary.Hholland 11:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems the External Link, Dan's Vintage G.I. Joe InfoSite is no longer active.
albabe - The Writer/Artist Formally  Known as Al Gordon 20:26, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead External Link 

message: That involves selling the main product at a low price in order to recoup it on high-markup supplies, consumables or accessories.  It's the first sentence of the article he linked to, which the author apparently didn't read.
Is there any evidence that the base figure was sold below cost?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.240.179.95 (talk) 08:39, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing to do with the razor/razor blade business model. 
Talk:Greek Catholic Union of the USA

message: The homepage of the organization does not say anything about its history. Therefore I marked the article as unreferenced.--AndriyK 12:04, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: The article cites two solid references: the organization's published history and a scholarly encyclopedia. That the organization's web page devotes itself to business, not history, is irrelevant.Rudowsky 12:48, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Response to references 

message: Maybe Ukraine or Czechoslovakia?  Pustelnik (talk) 18:39, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Belarus?
Talk:National Negro Opera Company

message: Removed a dead link in the infobox, which was drawn from City of Pittsburgh historic designations (it's dead there too and should be removed) (http://legistar.city.pittsburgh.pa.us/meetings/2008/5/4749_M_City_Council_08-05-20_Regular_Meeting_Minutes.pdf) Aolivex (talk) 15:39, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  City of Pittsburgh historic designations: source
Talk:Heinz History Center

message: The official name of this entity seems to be the Senator John Heinz History Center. It is even referred to as such in the lead paragraph of the article. 
I propose to rename the article to the full name form, with a redirect page to "Heinz History Center." Lou Sander (talk) 13:51, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds logical to me. Do you want to be BOLD and go ahead and make the Move - or should we get more input first?--Doug talk 13:56, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I always like to give others a few days to comment. Maybe they had a reason for naming it what they did. Lou Sander (talk)
In Pittsburgh most people and the media call it by its short form, Heinz History Center.Rudowsky (talk) 16:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

text: I see what you mean, since the above sounds like a very strong reason for keeping the existing name.--Doug talk 20:04, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename?
Talk:Affin Bank

message: very disappointment..some how and someone has deleted the bit information of this bank..and it totally an oaf to change to simple text ever.. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hafrul (talk • contribs).
*I removed a large chunk of the article text because it was copied word-for-word from the bank's website, and Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text without permission. I do apologize for removing the interwiki link, however. Cheers, Afluent Rider 03:52, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Teleomorph, anamorph and holomorph

message: I removed the "unreferenced" tag as an unnecessary feature. Not everything needs to be referenced if actually written by an expert. I am an authority on this topic. Additionally, the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature was linked - and it is an essential reference.Heliocybe 12:18, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Currently there's reference to nomenclature rules being set by the International Mycology Association at an International Botanical Congress, and then in the next paragraph a reference to "subsequent International Mycological Congresses" which is currently a red link, and also an unlinked mention of another International Botanical Congress. I'd like to help with the red link but I didn't know whether these refer to one and the same, or two different series of mycological conferences. - Egmonster (talk) 20:44, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  International Something Congress? 

message: What if within the species complex of an ascomycetous mold there is one genetic lineage capable of producing fruiting bodies, and another incapable? According to current definition, both are anamorphs as far as they form only mitospores. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20708436/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivan Pchelin (talk • contribs) 12:28, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not that easy
Template talk:Hillsong

message: I propose that this template be merged back in , and that pages use that template instead. It is far more comprehensive. Colin MacLaurin 12:18, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The original  template was starting to get very big (and no doubt would continue to grow), so it was split it into an overall template (), one for their albums () and their musicians (). Therefore, I suggest leaving them split up as they are and adding any more articles to the appropriate one. Marky1981 12:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Pictophonetic

message: with the Chinese character classification page. This page is basically a smaller version of the section "Phono-semantic", which is the same thing. Unfortunately I didn't realise this when I took the trouble of making this very page better. -  SuperMidget 12:21, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. kwami (talk) 19:19, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge