Talk:Watertown, Massachusetts

message: The "Famous People" Heading has had a reference to a "Pete Hanlon" several times, once as a singer, and once as the author of a work entitled "Incident at Knee Pads."  After searching, I can't find reference to either of these, or to Pete Hanlon as a prominent person or celebrity, so that kind of cuts out the "famous" part. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22:55, 9 December 2005 (talk • contribs) 
:12/31/2005.  The Pete Hanlon fan club is back defacing the page again, this time listing him as a "Famous Pan Flutist". - Lisa Williams 04:12, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable people, part 1

message: I have added a segment on Watertown's role in labor and industrial history. I am a new Wikipedian and welcome help on tidying up my markup as I learn how to do it better. Lisa Williams 04:02, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Early comments

message: Under people, should Tom Reilly be added? He's not Watertown-born, but he's been identified with the city because of his long (17 years? Something silly) residency here.--Thatnewguy 11:25, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added per lack of opposition. He was born in Springfield, but his Wikipedia bio calls him a native. --Thatnewguy 22:49, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable people, part 2

message: It would be helpful to have a map showing the original extent of the settlement's jurisdiction, and which neighboring municipalities have taken and given land to and from Watertown. -- Beland 01:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map request 

message: I edited the History section to make it more readable, breaking up long sentences and making more paragraphs from sentences of similar topics.  I added a References section as well as a new historical reference.  More history (and references) would be good. MacPhilbin 19:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History and references

message: This section seems like nothing more than a bit of advertising.  As a Watertown resident, I haven't heard of any of them, and the Web site for one gives its address in Waltham.  Is it normal to add such links to city articles?--JBH23 21:38, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable businesses 

message: Multiple times now I have put one line info for myself and a friend under the notable people section.  We both grew up in Watertown from infancy through high school.  Both of us are painters in the Boston area.  Though not famous I thought it okay for us to put a little note and link to our personal arts websites.  Multiple times they have been erased.  Just because you don't know us, doens't mean we don't deserve at least a one sentence mention.  I spent most of my life in Watertown dammit.  We grew up there.  Get a life and stop just erasing things you personally don't deem "worthy" of mention.  Maybe whoever felt the need to erase should try to create something notable within their own life that is worthy of mention.  It's pathetic.  -Rocco B. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.239.47.96 (talk) 22:03, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable people, part 3

message: Wikipedia is not a news medium. Please wait until matters clarify themselves before adding, removing, editing, warring over this incident. There is no urgency to be first with the news here. When matters clarify themselves, please only add material fully cited in reliable sources Fiddle Faddle (talk) 08:08, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: If at all. We're writing a short account of almost 400 years of history. The fact that a few persons got shot and/or arrested doesn't necessarily qualify for mentioning, I'd say. But that's a discussion that's better to have when the smoke has cleared. /Julle (talk) 09:09, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The answer depends on whether it is a genuinely notable incident, something that I feel to be unlikely. I was more interested in getting the rather silly nascent edit war stopped. If it is truly notable then it is truly notable. Time will tell. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:19, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah. I just wanted to point out, for future reference, that everything that turns up in the news isn't necessarily encyclopedic, to remind people that we'll actually have to determine whether it should be included in the article or not. But, yes, time will tell. /Julle (talk) 09:41, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The news coverage seems to point to it being likely to require its own article or be part of a different one, rather than be part of this one, that is if it is determined to be genuinely notable. I very much doubt an article about a town is a relevant place for such a news item anyway. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:49, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You people are insane if you cannot see how this is going to be a historically significant incident for the town. 196.215.72.148 (talk) 16:15, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Your view would be better expressed with civility. It may hold sway, it may not, but wikipedia is not a medium for breaking news. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 18:21, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It has nothing to do with the fact that it's breaking news, it has to do with the fact that it's a significant event. If something is a significant event, then of course it can be included even if it's a current event - there is no rule against significant events being included just because they're current, and that would fly starkly in the face with how most other articles on Wikipedia are handled. 196.209.243.217 (talk) 08:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The current / immediately passed police incident 

message: The history should link Massachusetts Bay Colony, at least, perhaps Winthrop Fleet. At least by rewrite, perhaps by expansion.
--P64 (talk) 18:46, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  1628–1630 

message: Under people shouldn't Bill Everett be added as he was raised in Watertown? He was a comic book artist who created Namor the Sub-mariner and co-created the Daredevil. He is also related to the famous Massachusetts Everett family and the very famous Poet/Artist William Blake. This is all according to his Wikipedia entry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.27.66.130 (talk) 05:29, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable people, part 4

message: School district, to be merged with area served MereTechnicality ⚙ 14:01, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Watertown School Department]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Watertown, Massachusetts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080404033909/http://www.salemdeeds.com/atlases_results.asp?ImageType=index&atlastype=MassWorld&atlastown=&atlas=MASSACHUSETTS+1871&atlas_desc=MASSACHUSETTS+1871 to http://www.salemdeeds.com/atlases_results.asp?ImageType=index&atlastype=MassWorld&atlastown=&atlas=MASSACHUSETTS+1871&atlas_desc=MASSACHUSETTS+1871
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080404035120/http://www.salemdeeds.com/atlases_pages.asp?ImageName=PAGE_0010_0011.jpg&atlastype=MassWorld&atlastown=&atlas=MASSACHUSETTS+1871&atlas_desc=MASSACHUSETTS+1871&pageprefix= to http://www.salemdeeds.com/atlases_pages.asp?ImageName=PAGE_0010_0011.jpg&atlastype=MassWorld&atlastown=&atlas=MASSACHUSETTS+1871&atlas_desc=MASSACHUSETTS+1871&pageprefix=
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080404034546/http://www.salemdeeds.com/atlases_pages.asp?ImageName=PAGE_0044_0045.jpg&atlastype=MassWorld&atlastown=&atlas=MASSACHUSETTS+1871&atlas_desc=MASSACHUSETTS+1871&pageprefix= to http://www.salemdeeds.com/atlases_pages.asp?ImageName=PAGE_0044_0045.jpg&atlastype=MassWorld&atlastown=&atlas=MASSACHUSETTS+1871&atlas_desc=MASSACHUSETTS+1871&pageprefix=
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:25, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:53, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: This page needs a City government section. I checked Boston, Cambridge, and Newton, and they all have a section on Government that at a minimum describes the governmental form (e.g. "Boston has a strong mayor–council government system"). 146.115.176.181 (talk) 06:01, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  City government section