Talk:Great Malvern Priory

message: This is one of the most  important  and well preserved 11th century lchurch  buildings in  the county  and it  is probably  worthy  of a much  more detailed article. A vast  amount  of material is available for anyone who  wants to  help out.--Kudpung (talk) 13:57, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The volume on Worcestershire contains extensive information on the building that is the subject of this article. Originally, the Priory and the Priory Church were not coextensive. I could not tell whether or not this is still the case, from the wording. On page 23: "For stained glass and tiles, Malvern is among the most important churches in England" (this is in context of introductory overview of buildings of interest throughout the county). In the part of the book that focuses on Malvern, there is a heading "Malvern Priory" then, a few lines later, the phrase "monastic churches" and, on the next line "the church". This seems to set the scope of the material that follows. However, it does not seem to exclude the possibility that there is some structure extant that was part of the Priory outside the Church. The web site  suggests that it is. But I cannot be sure. I could email the Malvern Museum. BUT -- if I edit the article to include material from the Pevsner book, fine tuned to fit whatever I learn about the coextensitivity or non-coextensitivity, I will violate the interpretation of WP;NOR doctrine that prevented my editing another site for several days. Should I spend time on this, or assume that wiki wrangling could make this wasted effort.
Also, the Pevsner books are central to an idea that I have floated a few times already, that has been ignored. These typify a vast number of sources that can each provide information for many articles. It would be far more efficient to copy information town by town from one of these books, then generate insertions to the articles about each of the towns, properly referenced, and to articles about kinds of architectural structure, and to articles about people depicted in paintings, statues etc in the buildings, and propagate this information to the articles, mechanically if possible, or with help of students. Comments welcome.
Michael P. Barnett (talk) 21:23, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Buildings of England]] by [[Nikolaus Pevsner]]

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.worcester-cathedral-vollers.co.nr/
*:Triggered by \bco\.nr\b on the global blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 17:17, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page