lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Alkyl phosphate

message: Shouldn't the first sentence ...
Alkyl phosphates belong to a group of organic compounds called organophosphorus compounds.
... cross reference "organophosphates", a narrower class of compounds to which alkyl phosphates belong, rather than organophosphorus compounds? Thomas.Hedden (talk) 15:42, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I have amended the lead. Biscuittin (talk) 19:20, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggest XREF -> "organophosphates"
Talk:Aldol

message: I recommend merging this article with Aldol reaction. Haligonian1 14:17, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely agree. Aldol reaction is a featured article with much more info on the subject.
As a really forgetful person, I rely on wiki articles to remind me of what compounds like Aldols are. I do agree that Aldol reaction gives a much better explanation of what an Aldol is and how an Aldol reacts, but I don't agree that the two should be merged. For example, Ester is independent of Esterification, while both have 'good', informative content. Perhaps, a simpler explanation of the structure of an Aldol (eg. RCOCH(R')COHR" -I'm still not sure of the structure myself.), along with a summary of the main reactions and chemical properties of Aldols would be a better alternative than merging it with a detailed page that could easily overwhelm someone looking for a short, concise definition? I'm new to this, so I won't try to edit anything without being given the green light.--Tomásdearg92 (talk) 14:36, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

text: Definitely think that having a short article on what an aldol is specifically is a good idea.  The section in this article about aldol discovery however, is actually about the aldol reaction, and probably can be removed entirely.CrocodilesAreForWimps (talk) 15:20, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

message: — Assignment last updated by RS UBC800 (talk) 21:18, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 300

message: I plan on fixing the second citation by adding the pages referenced and finding the citations for the dehydration equation. I will add more examples of Aldols under Reactions and its applications. I also want to expand on the structure and bonding of Aldols. --TaroToro (talk) 05:18, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please be mindful of Aldol reaction, an extensive article  Aldol refers to a functional group, a narrower topic. Use reviews or books for your sources.  --Smokefoot (talk) 13:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing plans
Template talk:Cities and towns in Wolfenbüttel (district)

message: The name of the district is Wolfebüttel, not Wolfenbuttel; please don't remove the umlaut. Jim_Lockhart 13:52, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, but in order to get the right categorization, you have to change the ü to u. -- Netnet @ 18:32, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Milaca, Minnesota

message: Color me ignorant, but why is there such a long and subjective piece on Darwin Bruesewitz? Lmeister 13:54, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because somebody didn't realise that they shouldn't add such a thing.  Problem solved.  Nyttend 13:29, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Samuel G. Freedman

message: Would love to see a bibliography and some more biographical details of Freedman, the latter derived from his 2006 book, Letters to a Young Journalist. AndreasKQ 13:24, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wish list
Talk:Skanda (Buddhism)

message: why does "Wei-tuo" redirect to this page? Please clarify in the article. Wei-tuo is on the hot list of mythology topics. Goldenrowley 03:36, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: related topics=

message: I don't see what the Kung Fu page has to do with anything - surely it should be on its own page  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.232.141.119 (talk) 20:18, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I believe this "figure" has another name, called "Idaten"? I'm not sure what the exact reference is though. --UltimateKuriboh (talk) 20:17, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Idaten

message: This entire article is about the Chinese figure Wei-Tuo, but it refers to him as “Skanda”. What evidence is there that Wei-Tuo was ever known as “Skanda”, or is derived from the Hindu Skanda? “Wei-Tuo” is a Chinese transliteration of the Sanskrit word “Veda”, which has no obvious connection to “Skanda”. The very title of this article needs a “citation needed” tag. 100.8.88.228 (talk) 04:56, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Why does this article call him Skanda?
Talk:Carlos Diegues

message: There is a huge content gap in this article. More biographical information can be provided on the like of Carlos Diegues. In addition to more information about his life, you can see if he did something else other than being a film director, such as being a prominent social figure in Brazilian society. You can also include more details on what genre of movies he made. Going off the movie idea, talking about his most popular movie and how it impacted or represented Brazilian society would also be informative. 
When adding all this information, proper structure should follow meaning that appropriate headings should be given. All the links worked on the current page and seemed neutral, but there are only three sources present. More primary sources are definitely needed and scholarly sources are also needed. Since no comments are currently present on the talk page, hopefully this helps! Mariaa45 (talk) 19:06, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maria’s peer review 

message: I would agree with the importance of all of the proposed additions to this article that are mentioned above. I believe that the most pressing is expanding on the information with reliable sources. Also, reformatting to add more subsections within the article will make information more easily followed by the reader. Dgenners (talk) 00:53, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review 

message: No edits have been made to this page since my initial peer review, so my advice from there still stands! I look forward to reading it once you have updated it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariaa45 (talk • contribs) 14:50, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maria’s Second Peer Review 

message: I second the above point and am excited to read the article once it has been changed. Dgenners (talk) 17:08, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danica's Second Peer Review
Talk:Roy Chadwick

message: The article doesn't tell if any of his daughters had any son.Agre22 (talk) 00:09, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: He doesn't had any grandson?

message: Farnworth is not in Widnes, it is in Lancashire NEAR Manchester!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.244.58.14 (talk) 15:56, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Farnworth, Cheshire it says it moved from Lancashire into Cheshire in 1974 which helps as the other Farnworth is in Lancashire as well near Bolton. So unless they have moved it again in the last few months the article is probably OK. MilborneOne (talk) 16:10, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Farnworth
Talk:Michael R. Gordon

message: Where's all the Iraq stuff? Relata refero 04:44, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: LIBERAL BIAS, Wikipedia stop letting people put liberal anti-war bias ist not true  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.219.245.11 (talk) 00:25, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  BIAS 

message: if (or when) more tangible links between mr. gordon and the pentagon come to light, please insert such material with cites.
for example, several months after the march 2003 attack on iraq, a few details about mr. gordon's co-author, judith miller, were published.  ms. miller's contractual arrangements with the pentagon were published in new york magazine (that she personally negotiated her embedding agreement, which then secretary of defense donald rumsfeld signed off on).
again, if (or when) such details come to light, please do not hesitate to cite to such details in the main article.  until then, statements such as "gordon is a shill for the worst excesses of the bush administration," however accurate and in fact obvious they may be, read as partisan and tendentious without substantiation.
with scandals and coverups such as these, the truth (often) eventually comes out, in print, it's just a question of waiting.  months, years, decades, better to wait for it (or report or otherwise publish on it oneself) than risk discrediting yourself with accusations of overstatement.  my two-cents worth at the present-time, anyway.   Alfred Nemours (talk) 19:12, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  language about "gordon is a shill for the worst excesses of the bush administration" in a broken footnote at article's start deleted 

message: I think it should be mentioned that this author also started the explosive claims of sick Wuhan lab workers on WSJ media. It seems significant enough to be added in, given how it's now become so viral and people should know who started reporting those allegations.
But think it should be minimally discussed first before doing so.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/intelligence-on-sick-staff-at-wuhan-lab-fuels-debate-on-covid-19-origin-11621796228 Nvtuil (talk) 01:43, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wuhan "sick worker" claim
File talk:Cockatielinthewild.jpg

message: I am not clear if the GFDL license on this image is correct.  I just found it on the American Cockatiel Society pages  and it's unclear if it started here or there first.  --zandperl 14:16, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The pictures have the same filenames and I vividly remember renaming this picture before uploading it, so I guess they took it from here. The picture is not copyrighted and is free for anyone to use. If there is some sort of misunderstanding, however, I will not hesitate to make any changes. -- Selmaelbeyati 17:12, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright?
Talk:Samuel Calvert

message: There is also Samuel Calvert (England 1828 - England 1913), printmaker and artist from Australia. I don't know his middle name. Commons has a few of his prints. What way would you like to redirect / disambiguate? 
[see here for small bio]
193.95.170.99 10:21, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Samuel Calvert

message: I searched the Great War service records, and could not find this Calvert. There are two Samuel Calverts in the records, but with different birth dates and places of birth than this one.
Plus he was 47–51 years old during the war, meaning he would have been unlikely to be accepted into the CEF.
The cited source says, "Samuel Calvert ... saw service as a corporal in the 19th Alberta Dragoons". It doesn't say anything about the Great War. Additionally, 19AD did not go overseas as a unit (though there was one cavalry squadron that wore 19AD badges overseas despite not formally being part of that regiment). I think we can say that he was in the NPAM but not the CEF. The timeframe of when he was in 19AD is unclear - before, during, or after the war will have to remain unstated. Indefatigable (talk) 19:35, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great War service
Talk:Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy

message: Just looking over this article, a number of the claims about why US Attorneys were fired are pretty speculative.  Paul K. Charlton for example, we say " He may have been fired because he had started a corruption investigation into Representative Rick Renzi"  I cant view the WSJ article on this, but none of the other sources confirm this.   In any event, how much emphasis should we put on what *May* be the case?  Kevin Ryan, "he was allegedly fired for the possible controversy that negative job performance evaluations might cause if they were released".  Carol Lam, no reason is given, but we imply it had something to do with her prosecution of Randy "Duke" Cunningham.  There are more.  
How much weight should we put on speculation and supposition of motives in this article? Bonewah (talk) 17:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  A lot of this is pretty speculative 

message: WP:Primary is relevant here.  "Specifically Do not analyze, evaluate, interpret, or synthesize material found in a primary source yourself; instead, refer to reliable secondary sources that do so." and "Do not base an entire article on primary sources, and be cautious about basing large passages on them."  We have a number of paragraphs that cite official documentation and testimony.  While not specifically forbidden, we need to be on the look out for places where we interpret these sources ourselves or use them as the only citation for a claim.  Bonewah (talk) 18:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extensive use of primary sources 

message: In this article we claim that "Daniel Bogden (R) U.S. Attorney for Nevada was investigating Nevada Governor Jim Gibbons (R) for bribery, when he was fired without explanation after seven years because of a vague sense that a "stronger leader" was needed. His loyalty to President Bush was questioned by Sampson"
None of the citations back up this claim.  Im hesitant to remove the passage, however, as we will then have nothing to say about Bogden. Perhaps we should mimic what the Atlantic had to say, namely that no explanation was given.  Bonewah (talk) 19:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daniel Bogden
Talk:Androsynth

message: The noncanonical novel "Interbellum" featured the "first and last" Androsynth being a part of the crew of the Galactus. He had superhuman speed and strength and could rip apart a fully-armored squad of Ilwrath marines within seconds. Should any of this be mentioned in the article? Chronolegion 14:37, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interbellum 
Talk:A Pretty Girl Milking Her Cow

message: Category:WikiProject Irish Music
Vague notation - "what this statement means is that she sang the song in its original Irish-Gaelic version while appearing in Dublin in 1951 you could substitute the word 'singing' for the words  'providing herself with'.  The statement is taken directly from a press conference given by Garland in Dublin and is written in the style structure of speak used in Ireland which can be different than American structure or words - particularly at that time (1951). The song was adapted for her by Roger Edens to capitilise on her Irish  roots and was referred to as an "obscure" Irish folksong and jokingly by Garland as remaining an "obscure" Irish folksong  after its release - which wasn't entirley true as it was a big hit for her at the time and one of her most popular songs during live performances. Garland was familiar with the original song through her Grandmother and its popularity in the music hall circut among Irish immigrants at the turn of the 19th century.  The background to the song's development and how Garland felt about it is detailed in John Frick's book 'Judy a Portrait in Art and Anecdote'145.229.156.40 12:43, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Il Tempo (racehorse)

message: I was actually at the 1970 Wellington Cup and saw Il Tempo beat Highland Rebel by two lengths. Both broke the world record and the great mare Honour Me was third. I have also seen Deep Impact's time posted. To do this, Deep Impact must be one hell of a horse and I take my hat off to him. He is probably the best stayer of all time, and even better than Il Tempo! I have seen a lot of racing since, including the Derby, the Arc and quite a few Melobourne Cups and Cox Plates, including the Bonecusher/Waverley Star contest. However, that Wellington Cup is definitely the best horse race I have ever seen. Wallie (talk) 22:05, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deep Impact
Talk:Put-in-Bay High School

message: This is a very small page for a small school... it doesn't have to be that way. Any responsible person can edit this and extend it. If you understand HTML then great .,.. but you can find out how to Wiki. Welcome Victuallers 15:13, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess
File talk:F1 grand prix world map.PNG

message: Tasmania (the island immediately beneath mainland Australia) is part of Australia and hence should be shaded green. DH85868993 14:54, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tasmania should be green

message: There should be three dots for Portugal. Lisbon (Monsanto), Porto (Boavista) and Estoril (Estoril). Joaopais 19:14, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Portugal spots
Talk:Guyver movie

message: The information about a possible Guyver 3 movie seems more appropriate for this article about the Guyver movies. It will also help expand this article to give it more relevance since right now it almost serves as only a disambiguation page between the two movies. Any thoughts? (Guyinblack25 14:58, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article should be deleted, as the two separate articles on the Guyver movies already cover the subject adequately.Konczewski (talk) 02:42, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: agreed. I think this article is orphaned anyway.Drag-5 (talk) 14:27, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge info from [[Guyver: Dark Hero]]
Talk:Apollo Eleven (horse)

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support per WP:COMMONNAME. First two Google Books pages; all spacemission, nothing about the horse. - The Bushranger One ping only 09:05, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly this is going to WP:SNOW. Suggest the next editor passing through moves and closes. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:25, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Word. Red Slash 16:59, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Any additional comments:
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
Looks like this was already done, and in this case, I personally would have agreed, given that the horse was most likely named in honor of the spaceflight (permanent names are usually given to the horse when it begins racing at age two), but tacky to snow close it less than 8 hours after it went up, particularly when it went up in the wee hours of the USA when everyone was asleep, and with only four people commenting.  Just saying; poor form.  Montanabw(talk) 19:49, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not at all. This is so obvious that the discussion shouldn't have been opened in the first place. Ego White Tray (talk) 15:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:World Athletics

message: Hiking the Appalachian trail to you and your family are well and have you been doing it before I get there I watch the movie the last time you were to buy you a round of these days
You can do to help you to come over ☺️you 🙂you want you could you do it before the most high sis I to to get a round the road me to get a new one of those and the kids are in bed 🛏️🛏️🛏️ you you too the you are the only one 🕐 you the money 🤑 you you too love to see you but you can do the same you
I 72.27.19.37 (talk) 21:31, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  International body alethic 

message: I thought this was a done deal back in this 2022 RFC but obviously not. A handful of editors did another rfc with no sports projects input at all. And it's being challenged because we just noticed it. This could affect almost every single tennis and Olympic article we have, and goodness know how many other sports. Some may have already been moved it you weren't watching the article. And not just the article titles will be affected but all the player bios that link to the articles. Sure the links would be piped to the right place if thousands of articles moved, but if the wording in a bio still said 2023 Wimbledon Championships – Men's singles or Swimming at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Men's 200 metre backstroke that would likely need to be changed by hand. There is also talk of removing the ndash completely.
Perhaps this is what sports projects want and perhaps not. Either way I certainly don't want projects ill-informed as the last RfC was handled. Express your thoughts at  the following rfc. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:15, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Capital_letters#RfC_on_capitalization_after_a_colon_or_dash|Major RfC on capitalization]] of all our articles
Talk:2007 National Invitation Tournament

message: The article mentions that the field of contestants was reduced from 40 to 32 for the second year in a row. However, the WP article for the 2006 NIT shows that there were 40 teams last year. The source for this statement in the 2007 article is Ref 3, an AP article that has a confusing or incorrect sentence about this. BartonM 15:50, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the AP article was confusing (I originally put that incorrect statement there).  On another read, you're right :) Thanks for the fix, there's a reason for citing sources =) -- Ash Lux (talk | contribs) 16:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 40 teams or 32?
Talk:Science Friday

message: Both articles are pretty short.  Why do we need two articles? Huphelmeyer 18:36, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: well, if brevity were a criteria for merging articles that would be fine. but other than sharing the same time-slot once a week, they have nothing to do with another: different hosts, staff, topics, cities....  primarily, it just gives conan a day off. --emerson7 | Talk 06:02, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Even though it is "merged" with Talk of the Nation, as far as I've seen and heard they seem to be pretty separate from each other.  Other than (as emerson7 said) having the same time during the day but different days of the week and both covering news-ish stuff, they're pretty different.  Plus it's a hell of a lot cooler than Talk of the Nation and much more informative.  If only they had more than 2 hours once a week...  Hedfones (talk) 16:22, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  merging with Talk of the Nation 

message: I noticed User:Iflatow has contributed to this article and tagged it with .  Aside from promoting mobile apps for the show, a lack of secondary references, and the COI guidelines themselves, I don't see any particular problems with his contributions.  -- ke4roh (talk) 13:37, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:COI|Conflict of Interest]] 

message: Science Friday last week announced a new partnership with PRI.  Appropriate changes will be needed in this article as details of the new situation become clear.
Diaskeuast60 (talk) 04:44, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article will need changes to reflect change from NPR to PRI 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I want to improve this  page by rephrasing/rewriting chapters and adding more information. If you have any suggestions please let them on the talk page.Adriannecula90 (talk) 15:19, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content update
Talk:All Songs Considered

message: where is the tiny desk performance space? T-303 (talk) 23:32, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: (9 years later) It's ridiculous that no one replied to you, nor fixed the article to add the requested information, in nearly a decade. That's not very encyclopedic, is it? 2605:A000:FFC0:5F:F9BD:9D:B97C:57D4 (talk) 00:24, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  where is it ? 

message: Didn't Bob Boilen retire in October 2023, and doesn't that mean he's no longer the host of this program? 2605:A000:FFC0:5F:F9BD:9D:B97C:57D4 (talk) 00:25, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retirement of Bob Boilen