Talk:Jurassic Park IV/Archive 1

message: Umm, if this movie has not even been started (pre-production) and there is some speculation as to whether or not it will ever be created, how can it possibly be released in 2006? Especially since JP movies are traditionally released in the summer. Roman Soldier 03:18, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Release date

message: Does anyone know any sources for the confirmations by Spielberg on what scenes will be in the movie?  Since he isn't officially directing or writing it, how would he know what is going to be in it?  Sounds fishy to me but not fishy enough to delete yet...Oldkinderhook 02:27, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, Spielberg may in fact be directing the film. See the current revision of the article. --Every1blowz 15:08, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: the article claims this will happen after indy 4...rumor or fact?  anyway indiana jones 4 is supposedly still in the development stages and won't come out for a very long time (if ever).  Jurassic Park IV???  don't hold your breath!
:From the interview with Frank Marshall by iF Magazine...
::iF: What about JURASSIC PARK 4? :)
::MARSHALL: It’s kind of off the radar. We’ve got BOURNE here [he indicates at the top of the table he’s sitting behind], we’ve got INDY here, [indicates a little further back] and we have JURASSIC back here [far back - almost at the edge of table]. Steven’s obviously been pretty busy the last year, so we haven’t focused on that yet. But we will.
:We'll just have to take his word for it. --Every1blowz 08:22, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  yeah right 

message: Super-dino crime fighters?!!! The series should probably come to a conclusion before submerging into total bogus like genetically engineering humans. The first film was scientifically plausible (at least somewhat)(one of the few that are), but now they're abandoning it and going straight to superheroes fighting dinosaurs?! Egads!!! Scorpionman 16:55, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is indeed getting a bit dumb. The first two films were classics and the third was just mediocre. Most likely, the fourth film would be totally rubbish. I dread to think of the future of this classic genre. The writers are all running out of ideas! --Siva1979Talk to me 15:12, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I totally agree. The first one was the best. The second one was okay, and the third one? Well, I haven't seen it but I hear it's pretty good (but not all that great). But, now we're going to genetically engineeered humans — well, it sounds like Steven Spielberg's getting into another Godzilla film series. Bug Eyed Monster 22:12, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the way it goes. Real dinosaurs are too boring, so they use monsters. After three films with monsters, those are too boring, so they need Ninja Turtles...Dinoguy2 22:30, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

text: What's so boring about real dinosaurs? I thought they were monsters! Scorpionman 12:53, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I've never seen a dinosaur film with realistic dinosaurs, so it's unknown whether or not they'd be boring ;) Dinoguy2 20:07, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: True. Dinosaurs were animals too, so they wouldn't go crashing through barbed-wire fences, Blockbuster videos, buses and pecking through windshields like crazed monsters. I'm sure even dinosaurs had the capacity to feel pain. Of course whether or not a movie without dinosaurs on LSD would be entertaining is another story. --Every1blowz 20:23, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I simply refuse to believe that they'd go through with a retarded idea like mutated fighter dinosaurs. Honestly, would they really take a plot that would already be absurd for a shoestring-budget straight-to-DVD turd or a crappy PC game and use it in a Jurassic Park movie? Jerkov 22:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm sure they would. They should stop this franchise right now if they're going so low as to jump the shark. Scorpionman 21:40, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ridiculous 

message: I've removed it, because it doesn't belong on Wikipedia. (Any section titled 'Speculations' probably does not belong on Wikipedia.)  That section was entirely original research, and had some nasty weasel words like "many fans believe..."  Wikipedia is not a place to publish your own thoughts and analyses.  Unless someone can find a reliable source where these speculations were proposed I see no reason why the section should be included.  Nuge talk 10:31, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Speculations' section 

message: PLEASE DON'T TELL ME THIS IS TRUE! The first 2 were great, the third really needed help, but crime fighting dinos? I would rather have there not e a 4th movie than have that TERRIBLE idea come to life, please tell me if there is any new information about the film, hopefully some GOOD information. Bcody 00:22, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The talk page is meant for discussing how to improve the film article, not to express your opinions on anything but methods of improving the article.  My opinion is that the film article could be substantially improved by organizing the information better, such as Production and Plot.  The references could be cleaned up as well. --Erik 00:22, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article can only be improved by improving the screenplay. Scorpionman 21:42, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: — Knowledge Seeker দ 09:43, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super Crime Fighting Dinos?? 

message: What types of dinosaurs are to be in this movie? I suppose the Velociraptor, but what about the T-Rex or something more cooler? Like Spinosaurus?Punk18
It is unknown at the moment but I suppose the Velociraptor, T-Rex and the Spinosaur are all going to reappear. Along with new creatures but that is also unknown. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Koolboi141 (talk 
:Where did you hear that information?  Any sources? --Erik 19:57, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dinosaurs