Talk:Timeline of art

message: Why did someone create a redirect of 2024 in art (as well as 2024 in architecture having a similar redirect) to timeline of art?   This eliminates and has eliminated the ability to create 2024 in art.  Almost every other year has a page (if not all after a certain point in time).  There have been important events, exhibitions, and passings this yea... Can somebody please overide the redirect and create the page.Strattonsmith (talk) 22:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: [[2024 in art]]

message: * 1809 in art 
* 1808 in art 
* 1807 in art
* 1806 in art
* 1805 in art
* 1804 in art
* 1803 in art
* 1802 in art
* 1801 in art
* 1800 in art	
* 1829 in art 
* 1828 in art 
* 1827 in art
* 1826 in art
* 1825 in art
* 1824 in art
* 1823 in art
* 1822 in art
* 1821 in art
* 1820 in art	
* 1839 in art 
* 1838 in art 
* 1837 in art
* 1836 in art
* 1835 in art
* 1834 in art
* 1833 in art
* 1832 in art
* 1831 in art
* 1830 in art	
* 1849 in art 
* 1848 in art 
* 1847 in art
* 1846 in art
* 1845 in art
* 1844 in art
* 1843 in art
* 1842 in art
* 1841 in art
* 1840 in art	
* 1859 in art 
* 1858 in art 
* 1857 in art
* 1856 in art
* 1855 in art
* 1854 in art
* 1853 in art
* 1852 in art
* 1851 in art
* 1850 in art
Space saving in the future?  Maybe more cellpadding... gren グレン 20:53, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  1800s 

message: I'm not sure about the double spacing & line breaks introduced today; they effectively double the size of the list, make it far less logical, and difficult to follow. Also, if the list is to expand, the side notes should have as small a footprint as is possible. - Coil00 21:49, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point.  It doesn't look quite right to me. Deb 22:10, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Line breaks

message: While stub-sorting I've found various articles like 80,000 BC in art which need some attention - not a "year" article, doesn't say what period it purports to cover, etc. It's not clear what hierarchy of articles there ought to be for the early periods of art.  These are linked in the page List_of_years_in_art and in the category :Category:Years in art, and Table_of_years_in_art#Other_years_in_art is a bit vague about them.  Someone more expert in art history, or in the handling of "years" in WP, might like to tidy them up! I'll post this message at a couple of other relevant pages in the hope of finding an appropriate enthusiast to take them on. PamD (talk) 07:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prehistory 

message: Seems like a lot of nothingness.66.74.176.59 (talk) 21:40, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "on art" ? if it is a timeline of art then why is this phrase necessary ? 

message: I noticed these lists appear to only focus on "Western Art" (ie. European and United States) and not really any focus on the rest of the world. Can someone work on correcting this? It's a huge undertaking. Jooojay (talk) 04:50, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  List diversity for "(date) in art" 

message: Particularly beginning in the 2020s the amount of artist deaths included in this list makes the timeline way less functional. I don't see the value in including every name here, but making editorial choices about which to highlight does seem complicated. Thoughts? Thigh twombly (talk) 13:00, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death rate