lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Help talk:Special page

message: On most special pages, there is a link to a talk page, but not on that page.  LibraryGeek (talk) 06:35, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where can I give feedback on [[Special:PageAssessments]]?? 

message: May I call your attention to my recent post at Wikipedia talk:Special:ListRedirects  I think it's time we implement a generalized search/list function with the ability to select/deselect namespaces, properties, etc.  We have a number of special-purpose pages that don't allow you to combine searches and have generally outlived their usefulness.  Thoughts and suggestions are most welcome.  LibraryGeek (talk) 06:39, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: LibraryGeek special pages are a function of mediawiki core, a single wiki can oly translate the interfaces. You have to open a task on :phab--Pierpao (talk) 10:49, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perhaps it's time for a generalized search/list function. 

message: I'm not quite sure where to request help for this, so I guess if it's the wrong location feel free to move it to the better one and ping me.
When using Special:MergeHistory, I find my only main annoyance is that after merging, well, nothing can be done. Unlike rollack, which returns to the page, or the RD/OS menus, which just refresh to show the previous page with updates, the "done" screen of the merge tool just says . Would it be possible to include a link to Special:MergeHistory below that message, maybe with a note saying "perform another merge" or something? I guess I'm just annoyed that when I have to run multiple merges at once, I have to open up that many windows (or re-type that part of the URL). Primefac (talk) 12:25, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Special:MergeHistory 

message: Is there any particular reason why Special:History is not documented on this page? It seems to work OK, even if the output format is a little unfamiliar. Example. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:59, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that it's designed for mobile users; most prople who write the help pages are desktop users. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Special:History 

message: Hi! I wanted to ask: just as there is a special page Special:PrefixIndex, is there an equivalent for pages with a last specific word? Many thanks in advance. NoonIcarus (talk) 00:36, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Special:SpecialPages#mw-specialpagesgroup-pages suggests not. --Redrose64 🦌 (talk) 17:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  I understand. It's a pity, but thank you for letting me know. Kind regards, --NoonIcarus (talk) 17:29, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Special:SuffixIndex?
Talk:Sir Jonathan Trelawny, 3rd Baronet

message: Should "Trelawney" be spelt with an "e" or "Trelawny" with no "e"?
Talskiddy 22:45, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Chambers Biographical Dictionary' , has Trelawny. DuncanHill 11:28, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling
Talk:Municipal arrondissements of France

message: In Lyon and Marseille, people are less accustomed to the arrondissements, and they rather use the names of neighborhoods instead of the arrondissements.
I'm living in Lyon at the moment, and as far as I know, everyone refers to the arrondissements by number, and I don't think there are even names for the neighbourhoods.  The 6ème is just the 6ème, for example.  Vieux Lyon (5ème), la Croix Rousse (4e) and the Presqu'île (2e) would be the only exceptions I can think of.  In case anyone was wondering why I made this change...--Stevage 22:51, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Arrondissements in Lyon
Talk:BRL-CAD

message: The licensing of BRL-CAD is unclear. The article states that it is merely open source, but checking the Sourceforge page tells me it is BSD and either GPL or LGPL. Is it BSD, GPL, and LGPL? Or is it BSD and GPL (in which case that should be mentioned and the open souce statement be changed to Free software, as that is more specific a category.) --maru  (talk) contribs 20:02, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Licensing

message: The article was full of utter nonsense about the glorious history of the software and praise words. Listing libpng, -tcl and such as important parts of the package, explaining the benefits of CSG modelling and writing extensively of a bet between the programmers and astonishment of a "worlds first" in CAD modelling.... The text was pompous to the point of actually being funny :-) Cleared it up a bit but it still needs work to be neutral and informative. The BRL flowgraph at least doesn't tell anything meaningful to a person not already familiar or very interested in the software. --piksi (talk) 12:48, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wow!
Help talk:User contributions

message: (not AMC) users contributions on mobile has been changed, is there anyone noticed that? The users contributions style on mobile is now the same as the users contributions style in Advance mobile. How to change it? —Ctrlwiki (talk) 00:59, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Enable and then disable Advanced mode. PrimeHunter (talk) 02:01, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: it didn't work. I want the old one, it's style is simple.  —Ctrlwiki (talk) 03:11, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

text: Apparently it was removed deliberately. See Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#The style of Special:Contributions on mobile version has been changed. Nardog (talk) 03:40, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Users contributions on mobile 

message: I see in talk history the section where "Only show edits that are latest revisions" was born. 
But what I commonly want to see is: pages where my contributions aren't the latest revision, since that means somebody else has edited the page after me.
This would instantly tell me if someone might have stealth-reverted or otherwise edited a page I recently edited. (I mostly stay away from high-traffic pages)
How do I easily see the opposite of "Only show edits that are latest revisions"? 
More formally: the pages I have contributed to, but only the pages with later edits than mine. CapnZapp (talk) 16:27, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: (The page can still show my edits as opposed to those of others. I'm still looking at "my contributions" after all. But I would know entries don't include pages I don't have any reason to visit, namely those where my last edit still is the current one) CapnZapp (talk) 16:31, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  The script User:Markhurd/hidetopcontrib can help with this. When viewing a list of contributions, you can click a new option on the "More" menu to hide all the lines that say "(Current)" -- John of Reading (talk) 16:51, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks. Will this functionality (or something like it) find its way into the standard functionality of Contributions? CapnZapp (talk) 17:01, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  This was requested years ago at :phab:T5753. Don't hold your breath. -- John of Reading (talk) 07:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only show edits that are **not** latest revisions? 

message: personal profile privacy concerns 118.210.35.51 (talk) 23:48, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: What are you referring to? PrimeHunter (talk) 00:29, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Privacy  

message: This is my suggestion for a feature addition: Adding an auto-refresh feature, like Recent changes, for contributions. This would be good for those who want to fight users who keep vandalizing articles. - Master of Hedgehogs (converse) (hate that hedgehog!) 12:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auto-refresh
Help talk:WikiHiero syntax

message: It seems it doesn't work on Windows 7?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.91.248.85 (talk) 12:16, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does it work on older Windows versions? 

message: Is it deliberate or a bug that the hiero tag doesn't get centred in the same way as regular text, in cases like the infobox on the Hemiunu article? --Lord Belbury (talk) 13:49, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not centred?
Wikipedia talk:All Policies in a Nutshell

message: have you checked:
*WP:SR
*WP:TRI
*WP:5P
?
Kim Bruning 23:23, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

message: Is there some reason that verifiablity and no original research were not listed as being among the core principles?  WP:NOT might also deserve a mention. --Allen3 talk 20:17, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:NOR]] and [[WP:V]]
Talk:Rules of evidence

message: I think the suggested merge is not a good idea.
The term "rules of evidence" has a specific meaning, which this article addresses very well.  The term is important, and deserves an article of its own.
The more general article evidence (law) does not address that specific meaning, and, imo, is not as well written.  --  Geo Swan 23:28, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: suggested merge?

message: I believe that this article and Evidence_(law) should be combined into a single article, possibly retitled "Law of Evidence."  Both articles are quite weak, and combining them would reduce the effort to create a single decent article.  More substantively, can anyone state what the difference is in the proposed subject of this article and Evidence_(law).  There isn't one set of "rules", as these obviously differ by jurisdiction, so it doesn't particularly make sense to have an article generically devoted to "rules."  If there is a difference, generically, between the law of evidence and the rules of evidence, it is eluding me.  
Comments above suggesting that rules can be distinguished from caselaw evidence a lack of understanding about how the rules actually work and also suggest that the commenters are under the misimpression that there is a single set of rules.
--Sjsilverman (talk) 20:21, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: revisit merge with [[Evidence_(law)]]?

message: Under the heading "History", "false evidence" is mentioned. But, this need not be the hearsay evidence just mentioned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.123.215.180 (talk) 09:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Dr. Tenma

message: The end of the article mentions the 1980 Astro Boy anime (which IMDB says aired in the ’60s?). What about the 2003 series? —Frungi 23:42, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Which Series?

message: As I'm copyeditting this article, I've got to wonder how much of this detail is really necessary.  While this is supposed to be an article about one character in a series, it goes into a fair amount of detail about the plot of two manga series and two of the television series.  How much is really necessary to explain who Doctor Tenma is?  
On the other hand, while all of this detail is given, there is no mention of the 1960s television series.  If we really want to describe the various roles that Tenma has had, shouldn't something be said about that series?
What do you think?  Not being that knowledgable about the subject, I have difficulty deciding what should stay and what should go.  I'll gladly make the necessary changes, if others will share their opinions.Hippychick 02:29, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  How much information is necessary?
Talk:Mini (Mark I)

message: The Mini article is in the Wikipedia:Peer review process - perhaps heading towards Featured Article status.  I would greatly appreciate experts on MkI Minis taking a look at it.  (If you find a problem, please either fix it or post your concerns on the Talk:Mini page.  TIA SteveBaker 20:50, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Your help requested 

message: In the sidebar, listed under body styles, a Hatchback is listed.  Except for a few rare 3rd party conversions made for such clients as Ringo Starr and Peter sellers, I'm pretty sure the mini's rear window was fixed.D.C.Rigate (talk) 13:42, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hatchback? 

message: I think that this is reliable and so I have changed the explanation in this article. This is my source: Model ADO codes. Eddaido (talk) 12:31, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: ADO15 means Amalgamated Drawing Office 15

message: I'm not sure why the Mini Mk1 needs its own article/page, when the main Mini article/page covers this and the rest of the iterations of the car and feels in some ways duplicated. Not sure about the relevance of part numbers has to do with Mk1 Minis as I'm sure many other BMC cars and products would have had similar dating codes. 
I think there is scope that it could be merged with the main page, especially information about Mk1 production changes. BRail Network Group Ltd (talk) 19:10, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does the Mk1 need its own article?
Talk:Black Tape for a Blue Girl

message: Hi, I figure the black tape for a blue girl is probably a good place to leave this message. If anyone ever wants to work on any bands that need pages like Unto Ashes, love is colder than death, etc.; or think my idea for an ethereal article, to differentiate this music from the often more aggressive Darkwave sound, is a good idea, please drop me a message - if not just to say hi to another blacktape fan! Khiradtalk 23:47, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Work on Projekt related articles

message: Made a start on articles for the albums. As they were done as a batch, there may be the odd error. Also, I do not know the tracklisting for with my sorrows. I have not yet finished all the articles. I have also uploaded several larger pictures of the album covers than the ones being used on this article specifically, if anyone wants to switch them. J Milburn 20:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Album articles

message: "Before the Buildings Fell" has been deleted, as it is not a black tape album. It is a Sam Rosenthal album. -Joe 21:55 7 September, 2006 (PST)
:I have sources that suggest otherwise. Look here, why would Sam's own record lable say otherwise? I am putting it back in... J Milburn 17:11, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Before the Buildings Fell

message: Might mention that the Sam Rosenthal link directs to an Israeli footballer. Khirad 07:23, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. J Milburn 11:17, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sam Rosenthal link
Help talk:Inputbox

message: Is the inputbox extension broken? Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_mediation#Suggestion_to_fix_the_box buttonlabel doesn't work.
If I remove  from this page, buttonlabel doesn't work here either.
See: Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Inputbox MediaWiki extension broken? Inclusionist (talk) 03:02, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: inputbox extension broken?
Talk:Andre Gunder Frank

message: There was no such thing as the "Allende regime" mentioned in the article. Instead, he (Allende) was the first democratically elected president of Chile. What helped topple him was a feared and fierce institution of global terrorism called "C.I.A.".
This is a very skewed entry. It summarizes Andre Gunder Frank's entire work in 444 words (this comprises several, extremely significant scholarly books, a scholarly career of approximately 50 years). That is followed by a four times longer, rambling "summary" of one of his last papers in which he ostensibly predicted the global crisis of late 2008. There are two problems with this. First, the proportions are obviously off: if there is to be a section on "Predictions" it should be short--definitely much shorter than the overall summary of his work. Second, Frank, while clearly a tremendous scholar, was not the only person "predicting" the crisis of world capitalism; the entire world-systems school took this pretty much for granted for a good fifteen years now. Immanuel Wallerstein's work, Samir Amin, the later generations of world-systems scholars all talked about global crisis constantly. This treatment narrows, flattens and makes disproportionate Frank's contribution. Jborocz (talk) 17:55, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: There's a photo of Frank on the article on him in the Russian Wikipedia, at: Гундер Франк, Андре. Not sure if or how that image might be used on this article... DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 23:02, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Via the Russian Wikipedia page and media archive, have located the original source of the image, at the World Systems archive at the University of California, Riverside. No credits are included in that source; anyone with that information, please note it below. Thanks & Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 01:40, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: André Gunder Frank or Andre Gunder Frank, worldCat uses both.
:.... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 02:26, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  André or Andre
Talk:Kung Ye

message: * linked to Chinese, Japanese  wiki.--Lulusuke 09:16, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  minor edit 
Talk:Pizza delivery/Archive 1

message: Archived --VileRage (Reply|C|Spam Me!*) 00:06, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

message: Is there an award for articles that typify the "Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia" principle? If there were, this article would be the first to be nominated. ---Isaac R 20:05, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No explicit award, but some consider being mentioned on Wikipedia:Unusual articles to be a sufficient honour. JRM · Talk 08:13, 2005 May 2 (UTC)
Yeah this article is terrible, but a fun read. The whole part on aqua teen hunger force is great
69.136.234.155
D'OH! I was removing 404's listed at Wikipedia:Dead_external_links/404/p and accidentally hit enter, and submitted. Don't wanna risk 3rr, so if someone else wants to nuke that last one, I'd appreciate it. --Vilerage 18:41, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a Paper Encyclopedia
Talk:Ralph Connor

message: I'm curious to why Charles William Gordon was reverted to Ralph Connor??
While I will note (somewhere in this feature) that the Manitoba Government gave the "Ralph Connor House" a Provincial Heritage Recognition in 2005; the name Charles W Gordon has been remembered by School Boards (such as in Scarborough, ON, now the Toronto Public School Board) rather than Ralph Connor....
Bacl-presby 00:13, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "These areas need to be expanded upon:
Academics,
Bibliography of works (ongoing),
Miltary Achievements (WW1), MAJOR CW Gordon)
Family,--
Church Roles,
Memorials.
Links (Ralph Connor United Church in Canmore) "
These comments are not mine, I only moved them from the article. Blarneytherinosaur 03:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Someones unsigned comments from the article page
Talk:Aurora, Oregon

message: Article opens with one and then talks about the other. Is the 2000 data still worthy of inclusion? 67.171.211.245 (talk) 13:47, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Why 2000 and 2010 census data?
Talk:East Bay

message: Mt. Eden is not a city. It is in Hayward and has been for many many years.
Neanderthalprimadonna 00:23, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion!  When you feel an article needs changing, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit any article by simply following the  link. You don't even need to log in!  (Although there are some reasons why you might like to...) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold.  Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly.  If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use out the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. Gentgeen 02:21, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Mt. Eden

message: there is Lawrence Hall of Science in Berkeley
Major pending 5000+ acreage development --Billymac00 (talk) 03:42, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other item(s) to consider 

message: I cleaned up the the "culture" section because other notable bands come from the East Bay not just punk rock you silly emo kids... learn your heritage ;)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.105.239.206 (talk) 13:30, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed the Culture Section 

message: found a few sites with recent stats to compare to the article: east bay economic development alliance.  Another is Calif Employment Development Dept
I have not analyzed against article yet, though the edab site varies quite a bit from the wiki
The former site shows:
# UC 13736
# US DOE 12485
# AT&T 8500
# Alameda County 7734
# Contra Costa County 7574
[ Nummi disregarded ]
# Kaiser 6606
# Safeway 5720
# Oakland USD 5689
# World S&L 4389
# Cooper Co Inc 4000
# Summerville Mgmt 4000
--Billymac00 (talk) 03:14, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest employers 

message: I deleted all the external links per WP:EL. None of them were solely about the East Bay, and the major ones such as EBMUD and AC Transit have their own articles. Binksternet (talk) 16:40, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Too many links

message: On the list of East Bay towns a number of them have the word 'inner' listed afterwards parenthetically. What is this supposed to mean? Thanks.
OK, prior to actually posting this I read the Cities intro paragraph I see where you are going. That said, having lived exclusively in 'inner' East Bay towns all my 53 years I've never hear that term, and as listed city-by-city, it makes no sense. (Many cities that touch the bay are not designated 'inner'). Suggest ditching the whole inner concept.
--Fizbin (talk) 17:45, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does 'inner' mean? 

message: Hey! I will be adding notes on progressive and liberal movements that the East Bay is famous for. Since these have, and still do, affect our day-to-day lives in the Bay, I think it is an important addition to the Culture section of the Bay. Ksundaramurthy (talk) 21:41, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding race and progressive background under "Culture"
Talk:Chicago XXX

message: This page is to discuss the upcoming album "Chicago XXX" by Chicago.
Please sign your comments with "~~~~".
"Added final cover, track listing, and running time". (LL/TM)
Do you have a link to verify/cite this? In the meantime, adding a not verified template to the page. Hotstreets 01:55, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I was curious as to why this was removed. I understand that the Album cover information is now moot since the album has been released, but the chart information was being kept current and I feel it added to the article as a whole. Hotstreets 21:35, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart Info 

message: You say "Chicago XXX managed to reach #41 in the US."
That would be a totally appropriate thing to say if the CD had been out for 6-12 months, but it's not even been out six weeks yet.  Or do you plan to update this page every week with the current chart position?
If you planned to leave it as it is indefinitely please just remove it altogether.
Thanks angrykeyboarder 12:31, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart Position