lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pérez Prado

message: Did Perez Prado really try to change Mexico's national anthem? If he did, someone really should add that into the article. 97.97.174.186 (talk) 02:08, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mexican national anthem 

message: The late Pittsburgh talk show host Doug Hoerth claimed that when "Prez" Prado was at the peak of his popularity, he made a deal with his brother (or possibly cousin?) that the relative would perform as "Prez Prado" with his own band in Europe while the original Prez Prado would remain in the Western hemisphere.  Later on, when his popularity wained, he attempted to undo the agreement, which led to estrangement from the relative.  Does anyone know if this is true?76.195.223.86 (talk) 06:20, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two "Prez" Prados?
Talk:Attaché

message: Is an attache or a military attache subject to diplomatic immunity???
If they are accredited as diplomatic attachés - i.e. if they are at an Embassy or other diplomatic mission, yes. See diplomatic rank.--Gregalton 07:00, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Innexin

message: What does "cell 1 cytoplasmic" mean? In addition, I have no idea what the meaning of the whole chapter of "Transport reaction" is. I want to know where the bibliographic references comes from. Thank you!
:「樽前作劇君莫笑，我死諸君思我狂。」 00:42, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A question
Talk:Cascade Heights

message: Here is what Atlanta Journal-Constitution talk about ‘We’ve been neglected’: How entrepreneurs are revitalizing a historic neighborhood. Rjluna2 (talk) 20:38, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  AJC's ‘We’ve been neglected’: How entrepreneurs are revitalizing a historic neighborhood
Talk:CompuBox

message: The significance of the claim that computers are involved in generating the so-called "compubox" statistics is mysterious. Just saying that the process is "computerized" leaves open the possibility that a man sitting ringside enters the number of punches he thinks the boxer has landed. This wikipedia entry tells us that the compubox system is operated by two people, but says nothing about how the humans are involved. If they are pushing a button each time that they think a punch was landed, then this "computerized" system is no more accurate, no different at all, than if one were to make marks on a piece of paper, and count them up at the end.
But if the numbers were generated by sensors in the gloves, or some other type of sensors, there would be a way to cheat the sensors, which would be worse. So the constant reference in boxing to "compubox numbers," although it gives the commentary an authoritative aura, is of very questionable importance.  
This entry is not all that useful.
I would have to agree with the above when it comes down to this article not being very useful,  a lot of things weren't notable, let alone the entire article lacking references, I believe most people would come to this page to learn how compubox works.  The name Compu-strike alone led me to believe that it some how artificially counted punches. I think it is also noteworthy to mention that no organizations actually use Compustrike to judge fights,  just to gauge a fighters performance. --EnrageD420 (talk) 23:03, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: COMPU-Box Computers?

message: Recently,  CompuStrike (Compubox under another name) has made its presence known in MMA and K-1, most notably all UFC/StrikeForce/HDnet events.  Also the name seems to have been changed to CompuStrike not Compubox.
Not only does CompuStrike "detect" power shots and jabs,  but it also collects information on take downs (attempts and successful take downs), advantageous positions gained by grappling, and kicks.  Again,  it should be mentioned that this isn't used to judge fights,  just to gauge perfomance.  References should be available from Compustrike's website.   I was wondering should we add a CompuStrike Section to Compubox? --EnrageD420 (talk) 23:03, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: CompuStrike and MMA
Talk:KIT (gene)

message: The official symbol for this (both mouse and human) is Kit.  (Well, technically Kit and KIT). The title should be KIT, I think. Mary Mangan (talk) 03:15, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I support the proposed move. --Arcadian (talk) 16:56, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

text: I also support. Kit is both the 'offical' term from the human gene nomenclature committee, as well as by far the most common used term for this gene. Ceolas (talk) 17:40, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

text: I agree. Independovirus (talk) 11:54, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

text: I'm shocked that this move hasn't happened yet!  The 'CD117' designation didn't arise until several years after the discovery of the gene, such that the actual gene is being redirected to its flow cytometry number.Mdonken (talk) 19:52, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should this be moved to the Uniprot name Mast/stem cell growth factor receptor Kit? Iamnotabunny (talk) 19:30, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a close call.  Mast/stem cell growth factor receptor Kit is a bit long for an article title.  I lean toward not renaming it. Cheers. Boghog (talk) 19:37, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Type I collagen

message: Can we get an atomic structure up in this mother?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.12.146.118 (talk) 23:52, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Refseq link to the protein does not point to Refseq at NCBI, points to somewhere else.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.14.9.104 (talk) 10:02, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Why Refseq link does not point to Refseq?

message: — Assignment last updated by Deh23 (talk) 01:06, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Adv Molecular Bio Bass-FSU-Fa23
Talk:Type II collagen

message: This page needs expanded and improved drastically. very little useful information present at the moment 86.155.110.81 (talk) 13:45, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvement Needed

message: Not sure if undenatured type II collagen is different (a form known as UC-II has been patented) but it seems to help osteoarthritis; as in (Safety and efficacy of undenatured type II collagen in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a clinical trial. 2009). - Rod57 (talk) 21:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undenatured type II collagen helps osteoarthritis 

message: I beleive that this page needs lots of information about collagen type II to be added.  Njoudyk (talk) 01:15, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  improvement
Talk:Union Hall Street station

message: I'm not sure what to do about the "Former services" display on this article. Main Line and Montauk Branch is a little vague; physically this station is on the Main Line. My 1962 Official Guide only shows Hempstead Branch trains stopping here; I don't have access to LIRR-specific timetables from that period. That timetable shows "Main Line" (Greenport) trains running direct from Jamaica to New Hyde Park station. Also, in general LIRR articles don't show "Main Line" in station succession, preferring the individual branches. Mackensen (talk) 21:22, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former services
Talk:Guanine nucleotide exchange factor

message: shouldn't this article mention GAPs?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.111.79.69 (talk) 22:27, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The pictures on the page are a little misleading.. they're pictures of GTP and GDP but in slightly different spatial arrangements, which might cause a novice to think that they were somehow different isomers, rather than differing by only a phosphate group... even just a small caption under the pictures might be helpful  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.183.44.160 (talk) 14:14, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well noted. I have replaced the image of GTP to match the image of GDP. --kupirijo (talk) 09:10, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Images of GTP/GDP

message: RasGEF domain mentions CDC25 and CDC24. - Rod57 (talk) 10:47, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which domain is CDC24
Talk:ADP ribosylation factor

message: I've added a little more detail to this article, but not much. Because this protein's main function is to interact with other proteins, it's hard to say what should remain in the article and what should go elsewhere. I also don't know if this page should be used to list all six mammalian ARFs and their functions, or if I should go to each of them separately and make changes there. DayBaye 20:26, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Son of Sevenless

message: WRONG WRONG WRONG:
RasGAP inhibits Ras activity... not increase it by a thousand fold!!!!! Someone with authority change this(End of Paragraph 1)
:Actually, it's largely correct: RasGAP is a GTPase Activating Protein, which, by inserting an arginine finger into the active site of Ras, dramatically enhances its ATPase (catalytic) activity; where you are partly correct, of course, is that this then de-tunes the protein as it adopts the GDP-bound form; a GEF or GRP will be needed to 'pry open' the active site to exchange the nucleotide. Philbradley 06:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: talk page of SOS protein (merged with son of sevenless)
Talk:Dalmatic

message: I removed the category:Orthodox Vestments, since the Dalmatic, as such, is actually a Western vestment. The Sticharion, which is the Orthodox parallel, is treated in a seperate article already in that category.MishaPan 04:18, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the Dalmatic is the Sakkos, not the Sticharion. I've put it back as the Sakkos is also called Dalmatic in some Greek sources. InfernoXV 07:24, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

text: и прости мя, Христа ради! InfernoXV 08:50, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk
Talk:Filopodia

message: There is a reference to Lodish et al 2004 in the first paragraph.  But it´s not included in the list at the bottom.== That's my picture! ==
I would love to know how a picture from my lab that has been on my lab website for two years is now on wikipedia!  That picture was never published anywhere other than a copywrited homepage. Please accredit pic or delete it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 139.127.177.20 (talk) 18:23, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: — Assignment last updated by Sbpitcher11 (talk) 18:03, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Journal Club
Talk:Wilfred Curtis

message: Further reference material that could possibly be exploited:
1) http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/index.html
2) http://www.london-gazette.co.uk/search
3) Sopwith Camel Aces of World War I
Georgejdorner (talk) 17:58, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further development
Talk:Rochdale Principles

message: In my experience, the principles by which most cooperatives today conduct themselves are known as the Cooperative Principles.  The Rochdale Principles, as laid out by the Rochdale pioneers, are the origin of the Cooperative Principles, but the term refers to the original incarnation of them.  I'm wondering if most of the information on this page might not be more appropriate on a page called Cooperative Principles (not to be confused with the Cooperative principle of course).  Thoughts?   Gobonobo 04:20, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If all the articles have been merged here, we can't merge and delete them 'cuz of GFDL attribution clauses.  I'm redirecting all the pages instead of deleting. Cheers.  --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 13:11, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cooperative Principles vs. Rochdale Principles 

message: :This article is sourced with only primary sources. Policies and guidelines mandate (WP:PSTS#5)  If reliable and independent sources cannot be found the article could be subjected to AFD. --  Otr500 (talk) 11:38, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues
Talk:HSPA8

message: I propose that HSPA8 be merged into Hsp70. The Hsp70 article describes the 'HSPA8' protein - or 'Hsc70', among other proteins in the Hsp70 family.. 143.167.174.172 (talk) 20:39, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose – If HSPA8 were merged into Hsp70, then the rest of the family members (13 in total) would also need to be merged.  Merging 13  templates into one article is not practical. Boghog (talk) 20:59, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Adventures of Captain Africa Mighty Jungle Avenger!

message: The intro to this article claims that filming began with this as a sequel to the same studio's earlier serial, The Phantom. I know that a "Trivia" note attched to the IMDb's entry on this production says so, but a great deal of misinformation has been posted there, so that's not good enough. The Great Movie Serials (by Jim Harmon & Donald F. Glut, Doubleday, 1973), says that Captain Africa was simply designed to resemble The Phantom so they could reuse a great deal of footage from that production. Remember, in 1954, Columbia had already dropped "Jungle Jim" per se from that series of programmer features and had Johnny Weissmuller nominally play himself (that is, as much as Roy Rogers or Gene Autry ever did), reportedly to save the licensing fee. Hence, I am adding a citation request to that passage and to one to the same effect in the other's article. Ted Watson (talk) 19:18, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You are sorely wrong on this. Stills of John Hart wearing the costume of the Phantom have surfaced (with John Hart's signature on them, where he signs as "John Hart, The Phantom", some of which can be seen following this link: http://www.bossescomics.com/fantomen.htm), and the fact IS that this was filmed as a sequel to the 1943 Phantom serial, using a lot of stock-footage from that film. Believe me, if you had checked out a few Phantom comics, this movie has been mentioned there several times as originally being a Phantom film, but re-shot because that was cheaper than pay the licence for the King Features character. Incidentally, there is also a few seconds of the serial in which one can actually see Hart appearing in a Phantom costume, clearly a blooper on the filmmakers' behalf but it's there nevertheless. --Kit Walker (talk) 20:56, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Now this is good and convincing, although it is difficult to understand how Harmon and Glut missed all this. I must mention, however, there are no pictures whatsoever on the specific page that link takes me to, and as I don't read Swedish, I have no idea what to clck on to bring them up [never mind, I found them; conclusive evidence, too]. I have put a "References" section on the "Phantom" serial's article, and I'll do it here. I started to put a message on your Talk page about this yesterday (March 31), but then we had a power blackout for four hours, and by that time my access to this computer was over for the day. BTW, are you the IP that first posted this info? I've had the site fail to "remember me" and had several edits posted under an IP before I noticed and logged in manually—once I got logged off while I was in the site, working off my own "My Contributions" page!—and am merely curious to know if it has happened to somebody else. Ted Watson (talk) 18:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Begun as sequel to ''[[The Phantom (1943 movie serial)|The Phantom]]''?
Talk:The Adventures of Quentin Durward

message: No wonder MGM didn't make any effort to take the film off the Internet!  The characters are all public domain and were so at the time this movie was filmed in 1955.Glammazon (talk) 22:45, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

message: It's possible that the film failed to recover its cost because most of the British stars - Kay Kendall, Robert Morley, George Cole, Alec Clunes, Duncan Lamont - were unknown to American audiences. If Grace Kelly had accepted the female lead might it have been different? The three leading players in 'Knights of the Round Table' and the four leads in 'Ivanhoe' were all familiar in the US. This film is arguably as good as 'Knights'. Color, design, photography, screenplay, locations and performances are all excellent. Duncan Lamont's villainous De La Mark is a standout - with a Transatlantic accent: "I wanna see 'er!" It didn't deserve to fail. O Murr (talk) 07:46, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Financial loss
Talk:Channel Country

message: Is there any fact to this politically-correct gobble-de-gook here?
Exactly how you could posit this as 'history' rather than supposed theories and so forth, exactly what 25 tribes, trading dust and shells and we're to term this as a "vast trade network" - This is offensive to anyone with half a brain and the least lick of common sense - How about the fact that Birdsville was only founded as a border crossing before federation, where the colonial governments would press tolls and excise taxes onto the stockmen and cowboys driving the herds south or north. - That is established history. - How about the fact that this is still done today to a greater or lesser extent?
How about a short history of the few towns? - Jundah, Stonehenge, Windorah, Quilpie, Birdsville, etc.
That is history - 'This', what we have written, is sentimental, political rubbish, go have yourself a smoking ceremony and burn yourself good.
- Eli.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.30.23 (talk) 09:43, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "History" 
Talk:Hoary-headed grebe

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Poliocephalus poliocephalus RB.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on November 8, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-11-08. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! —howcheng  {chat} 00:04, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Poliocephalus poliocephalus RB.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: It's an endemic bird in Australia.  On Nov 9 69.115.25.160 edited the opening line to "make it sound better" to suggest the bird was introduce to Australia and New Zealand in 1975.  This is false.  Owheelj (talk) 04:09, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Hoary-headed Grebe was not introduced to Australia
Talk:King quail

message: King Quail are a monogamous species and do not "fight for the right to mate with the females" so that "[t]he winner then breeds every female."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4892625/
When Wiki-editors like Elmidae revert corrections with citation from scientific papers back to the supposed "good version", which has zero citations, for their own ego, then Wikipedia will not progress. But it's of course up to Wikipedia whether it wants to be an actual encyclopedia with correct information contributing to the progression of human knowledge or a contributor to further inflated self-importance of people with big egos. 87.210.165.201 (talk) 16:41, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  King Quail are a monogamous species.
Talk:Paradise shelduck

message: There is a request for reassessment and I've given the article a good cleanup. An obvious omission is a close-up photo of a young bird. The biggest issue is that the lead does not adequately summarise the article. With that latter issue fixed, the article would be B class and appears ready to be submitted for GA assessment. Schwede66 09:49, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I've fixed the lead issue, but I don't think it's ready for GA assessment yet. KakarikiNZ (talk) 11:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment
Talk:Imperial Records (2006)

message: As both the 1947 Imperial Records and the 2006 Imperial Records are co-owned and the 2006 Imperial has adopted a 1950s Imperial Records logo, it's proposed that the two articles be merged. Steelbeard1 04:33, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I should add that the 1947 article should prevail with the infobox and text of the 2006 article incorporated into the 1947 article.  Again, EMI owns the old and new Imperial Records catalogues. Steelbeard1 00:36, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge the two [[EMI]]-owned Imperial Records articles
Talk:Moscow Sun Yat-sen University

message: ...WORKERS (or working class - positive to neutral connotation). Toilers (negative, strange-sounding) is flat-out wrong.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.127.80.59 (talk) 22:16, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toilers?! 

message: A discussion is taking place to address a potential problem with the redirect KUTK and it has been listed for discussion. Readers of this page are welcome to participate at  until a consensus is reached.  Rusalkii (talk) 04:52, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:KUTK]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:History of dendrobatid frogkeeping

message: Since this is such a specific topic, wouldn't it make more sense to just merge it into the main article as another section? 
Agharo 04:39, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into Dendrobatid Frogkeeping? 
Talk:He's the Greatest Dancer

message: It has been thought that this song is based on Tony Manero (played by John Travolta) from the movie Saturday Night Fever.Cbsteffen (talk) 02:32, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this song supposed to be about a specific man/male character? 

message: From the article: Nile Rodgers has speculated that this may have been the first occurrence of the later-widespread phenomenon of brands being mentioned in songs.
Not exactly. Paul Simon's Kodachrome from 1973 is titled after a brand name.  Also, there is "Take Me Out To The Ballgame" from 1908 which contains “buy me some peanuts and some Cracker Jack”.  There's also the 1907 song Budweiser’s a Friend of Mine. -Rolypolyman (talk) 16:36, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Brands in songs

message: The article states “ its 12″ version was shared by the "We Are Family" and "Lost in Music" tracks”.   Eh?   3 tracks on 1 12”?  I think not but can’t find a citation.  But it isn’t too hard to find something online listing a 12” with Greatest Dancer and We Are Family.  Anyone…..? Boscaswell talk 02:45, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  So what was on the 12”?
Talk:Dewberry

message: This line:
Anyone picking these wild berries can expect to have their hands stained purple and to have many scratches from the stickers, but the taste of the sweet berries is worth the trouble.</I>
Seems to me to be an opinion. I agree with it, but it's still an opinion. --68.184.56.61 04:44, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: Dewberry is also used as the common name for other berries of the genus that become dew-like in texture and are as delicious as dewberries.
''
isn't "delicious" a bit opinionated?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.125.14.117 (talk) 19:53, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Delicious" 

message: This article is really poorly sourced, mainly because I believe @Plantdrew 's suggestion that Dewberry isn't a very descriptive taxon. Merging with Blackberry would not only make sense at this point, but it would also result in a higher quality article overall 2600:1008:B030:D25B:F13D:43D1:4B8:3717 (talk) 13:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better sourcing
Talk:Yu Aida

message: Anyone can provide the proof that Yu Aida is a Guy? Details on firearms doen't mean he/she is a male, Hiromu Arakawa, author of Fullmetal Alchemist also has extensive details in military equipment, especially in Hawkeye's guns (she drew FN insignia in her gun), and military equipment in Briggs. 222.124.228.188 16:07, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled