Talk:Disappearance of Suzy Lamplugh

message: It has been suggested that, even if Suzy's spelling was very bad,  "Kipper" was too silly for her to have taken seriously. This suggests that she left voluntarily. A man called "Kuiper" was found in Holland. He was never charged with anything. He caused puzzlement by failing to claim an expensive car. He was also called "Kiper" and "Rosengarten". He produced proof that he was in Holland at the time.
This is stupid. 'Kipper' might be slightly funny as a name, but there are real people with that as a surname as can easily be found out by Google for example, and a professional like an estate agent would have met people with strange names before. 85.157.155.247 (talk) 17:50, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr. Kipper 

message: The man Suzy left with had reasonable looks, was fairly young and was well dressed. All this suggests that she left voluntarily.
:Why?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.154.58.251 (talk) 20:53, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suspect 

message: If there's been an investigation, no charges have been brought and he denies involvement, I can't see the purpose of this section being in here. I move to delete this as it contains nothing factual, just mere speculation (and possibly libellous speculation, whatever Mr Cannan's other crimes and convictions might be).
* It isn't libellous. First, the police have said it, so it's something a reasonable person might think. Second, a convicted double rapist and murderer has no good name to lose, so to suggest that he might have raped and murdered someone else carries no sting. Tirailleur (talk) 09:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[John Cannan]] 

message: Rip Suzy! should be deleted. It is in bad taste. In its' present form it could be seen as a reference to the Yorkshire Ripper. If the contributor is genuine in their concern, then at least put the RIP in capitals and delete the exclamation mark. Garstonboy (talk) 22:07, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  RIP 

message: An eyewitness remembered seeing a "shabby" man in a black BMW at the time, as he was holding champagne and champagne cups. Is this worthy of inclusion within the article, given this coincided with lamplugh being snatched? Furthermore, John Cannan was on release from prison at this time, and may have had access to a similar black BMW. Finally Suzy Lamplugh would have known Cannan, and some professional sources argue an affair. Would it be consider libel to put Cannan's possible affair with Ms. Lamplugh into the article, or accurate?--Cymbelmineer (talk) 18:14, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eyewitness evidence 

message: Why has this been moved back from Disappearance of Suzy Lamplugh? This is a case like that of the disappearance of Claudia Lawrence; the disappearance is notable, the person is not. Jim Michael (talk) 07:12, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: Why has this category appeared on the article again?  It implies she actually died in 1994, which one way or another (either she died in 1986, or she's not dead at all) is highly unlikely to be true.  Katharineamy (talk) 17:24, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that edit, Katharineamy - missed that one myself. Regards, David J Johnson (talk) 18:42, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Jim Michael (talk) 16:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  1994 deaths 

message: I just associate the use of the surname throughout with references to  perpetrators She's the victim. it'd be nicer to call her Suzy, or even use a prefix  if referring to her by her surname?Just a suggestion that occurred.brilliant article. Just my thoughts. Beautiful Rosie (talk) 19:26, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: In the news, perpetrators were traditionally referred to by their last names and victims by their title and last name; that is changing now, and according to the manual of style, article subjects, including victims. are not seen as being disparaged when we refer to them by their surnames; rather, Wikipedia is treating each person equally, without bias, even when they happen to be a victim or a criminal. Quisqualis (talk) 05:17, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Nobody actually called her Suzy. Her friends and family called her Suze and her workmates called her Susanna, which was her given name. The press called her Suzy because it fits better into newspaper headlines. See also Madeleine McCann / "Maddie". Tirailleur (talk) 11:15, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  She's referred to by her surname throughout 

message: I have restored the details of the book by David Videcette in Further Reading. They had been removed as self published. David Videcette is a former Metropolitan Police detective and author of several published books that have been independently reviewed. Wikipedia:Self-published sources would permit this books inclusion which in any case, is in Further Reading not references.
*
Darrelljon (talk) 05:36, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Videcette 

message: I my experience, prisoners wear no ties of any sort in prison. 2A00:23C7:99A5:9E01:E089:FC50:1406:B5C7 (talk) 12:56, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supposed ties in prison 

message: In line with other articles on missing persons, I have added article geographic co-ordinates (in the Reference section) to appear at the top of the article. I have used co-ordinates for Shorrolds Road. However, I'm open to discussion here of whether the co-ordinates used should be those of Sturgis where she was definitely was (as witnessed by her colleagues) or even the co-ordinates of where her friend Barbara Whitfield saw her driving on Fulham Palace Road. Darrelljon (talk) 11:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article co-ordinates 

message: Channel 5 has shown a new documentary entitled:
"Suzy Lamplugh: Last Seen Alive" at 22:00 on Tuesday 6th February 2024.  
It appears to conclude that Cannan was the person likely  responsible for Suzy's disappearance. 85.9.243.160 (talk) 22:56, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Channel 5 Documentary