Talk:Fenit

message: About then half of this article is devoted to Fenit Harbour and in turn that article has about half town data in it. In essence they are duplicate articles, so a merge seems the best way to give each it due; being a town article with a good harbour section. Duplicated articles are silly. ww2censor 15:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Support as per nom. (Sarah777 20:35, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with an article merge, but, in essence, the harbour is more important than the village. The village originated from the houses which were built to house the dock workers ~~MOC  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fenitharbour (talk • contribs) 16:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a source for that statement? If so, please provide it so we can maybe merge to Fenit harbour instead of the opposite. Without a source we will merge to Fenit. Cheers ww2censor 23:56, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

text: The problem with doing individual articles about each of these is that one ends up with a load of short stubs that have little real substance. A single article for all the Fenit's, which are all in the same area and interrelated, might actually become an inclusive article of quality and the other titles can be redirects to the main article. Have you considered that possibility? Possibly Fenit Harbour should be the main article. ww2censor (talk) 22:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Still agree - and I notice this proposal was made in October 2007! I could merge them but I'd need to be sure everyone was happy to go ahead. Ww2? Sarah777 (talk) 17:48, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  ww2censor (talk) 04:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice one Ww - this is definitely a new C - a grade I strongly supported 'cos FA folk like yerself and VK don't realise how important getting a C is to those of us scrabbling around in the stubs and starts! Sarah777 (talk) 06:36, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Fenit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725015225/http://beyond2020.cso.ie/Census/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=75478 to http://beyond2020.cso.ie/Census/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=75478
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071119080106/http://locator.anpost.ie/locator_offices.asp?grof=1709&county=Kerry&dublin=&office=Fenit to http://locator.anpost.ie/locator_offices.asp?grof=1709&county=Kerry&dublin=&office=Fenit
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081121044309/http://www.rnli.org.uk/rnli_near_you/ireland/stations/FenitKerry/history to http://www.rnli.org.uk/rnli_near_you/ireland/stations/FenitKerry/history
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fenit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080625041309/http://www.sailingireland.com/fenit1.htm to http://www.sailingireland.com/fenit1.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:45, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified