Talk:T. Harv Eker

message: I wasn't able to find negative criticism about Eker on the web, so I put up what I new to see if it could be expanded upon and made more neutral, so I hope it's not speedy-deleted. --Scottandrewhutchins 05:08, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone revised the apge after me and I tagged it as an advertisement.  I am going to revert it, even though my version was minimal, to prevent it from getting speedy deleted. --Scottandrewhutchins 11:33, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: advertisement?

message: I am adding some things to this article with the disclosure of a conflict of interest. I do not represent this subject and will make sure I follow the guidelines of the COI in Wikipedia. Each edit I make I will put into this talk page so you will know its from me. If there is an issue with any of my edits please notify me so we can discuss and modify if necessary Jessman88 10:20, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict Of Interest

message: The final paragraph has a very negative tone to it.  It needs to be rewritten with more objective voice.--Janus657 15:01, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That paragraph has been removed previously on WP:NPOV grounds, but it has now returned. --Scottandrewhutchins 18:21, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

text: It is still an opinion and a violation of WP:NPOV.  Wikipedia is not for users' [original opinion?]
. --Scottandrewhutchins 14:30, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

text: *So... are the above two statements true or true? =) --Dave1185 (talk) 18:08, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Negative tone

message: I only looked up this clown because I came to Wiki to find out what criticisms exist of his book The Secret of the Millionaire Mind, and there is no article on this book. 
I am being bombarded by radio advertisements from this huckster selling his local seminars (Where seating is limited! Hurry!) which are the same ads as the John Commuta, rich Dad, and all the crap that came before it. 
His radio ads state that his book The Secret of the Millionaire Mind is a #1 New York Times bestseller. Is there a source for that? I find it somewhat hard to believe that New York Times #1 bestsellers don't have so much as a stub of a Wiki page. Is there a source for this? This article only calls it a "bestselling book", but that is a pretty vague and modest statement if it is in fact a New York Times #1 bestseller.
When a guy has a pitch identical to that of Tom Vu and Don Lapre, I have to check it out before I'll believe that he is anything more than another Tom Vu or Don Lapre.--208.127.100.19 (talk) 01:45, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *Dear anonymous IP editor, thank you for your precious feedback but the tone of it strike us as being inflammatory and brusque, while your harsh remarks of another person as a "clown" is hardly a civil statement, which is frowned upon by Wikipedia and it's associate members. FWIW, if you have a problem with his book being listed as a #1 NYT Bestseller, I would suggest that you take it up to them for clarification. Note that this #1 thingie is not reflected anywhere in the article page. Another thing to note, please do not post trollish remarks on Wikipedia, its a very sure way of getting yourself BANNED if you do not respect our rules and guidelines. Thank you and regards. --Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ 04:48, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

text: *Dear anonymous IP editor, please note: 1.) Read WP:TLDR; 2.) Read Ad hominem; 3.) Read the Welcome note I provided you. Lastly, per WP:DENY I'm done talking to you because you are clearly out to continue your trollish comments. Goodbye~! --Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ 07:06, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: #1 NY Times Bestseller?!?!?

message: While I think it's okay to note that calling him a clown is inflammatory, I think the mod/admin threats come off as anti-free speech and equally immature.
This is the discussion page and maybe he has reason to question T Harv Eker's motives.
I'm not on either side.  I am just very anti-censorship and every time one of you admins or mods tries to win an argument by banning or deleting, it reinvigorates my anger toward the tech-administration structure of this site.
There is plenty of validity to having a large amount of controversy surrounding T Harv Eker's writings.  His messages are mixed between being good with money and spending it all, making for some serious confusion.
If you don't like controversy, you shouldn't be a mod or admin.  Covering it up with authoritarian gimmicks including threatening contributors and promoting political correctness to the point it dulls the senses isn't conducive to a better Wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.0.107.170 (talk) 11:17, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the discussion above. 

message: I just wanted to share with the world how much I hate this clown.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.22.237.165 (talk) 00:09, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  I hate him 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:28, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion