lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dragon Ball Z: The History of Trunks

message: Is it really intended to have absolutey no information about the soundtrack in the article? --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord2 06:48, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A summary of its release would seem to be appropriate, similar to any other film article. Basically date, producing company and producer (if applicable), number of tracks, and if there are any vocal tracks, who performed. A soundtrack listing, however, would not be appropriate. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 06:53, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

text: Something along the lines of, a CD soundtrack, Music in Dragon Ball Z: The History of Trunks (with appropriate nihongo title) was released in Japan on X by Y with twelve tracks by Dream Theater, Petrucci, and Chiho Kiyoka. A 3-Disk Limited Edition picture disk set featuring artwork by Dale Kelly was released December 12, 2001 by Animated Music. With sources of course. :) -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 07:15, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soundtrack 

message: ====Disc one====
*"Android 17 enjoys the calm before the storm"
*DBZ movie theme remix by Andy Baylor (4:07)
*"Shackler" by Bootsy Collins with Buckethead (5:42)
*"Home (edit)" by Dream Theater (5:01)
*"Garden of Grace" performed by Neck Down (4:47)
====Disc two====
*"Yamcha suffers defeat at the hands of the androids"
*DBZ/Havoc movie theme by Andy Baylor/Dale D. Kelly (3:23)
*unknown bonus track? (3:41)
*"Through Her Eyes" by Dream Theater (5:28)
*"Immigrant Song" performed by Triprocket (3:36)
====Disc three====
*DBZ movie theme remix by Andy Baylor/Dale D. Kelly (4:05)
*"Havoc (remix)" by Andy Baylor and Dale D. Kelly (3:08)
*Garden of Grace by Dale D. Kelly (3:02)
*"Ascension" by Mark Akin (4:50)
====Notes====
*Artwork and layout by Dale D. Kelly
*released December 12th, 2001 by Animated Music Inc
</blockquote>
So what could be put back? --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord2 06:59, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Something along the lines of, a CD soundtrack, Music in Dragon Ball Z: The History of Trunks (with appropriate nihongo title) was released in Japan on X by Y with twelve tracks by Dream Theater, Petrucci, and Chiho Kiyoka. A 3-Disk Limited Edition picture disk set featuring artwork by Dale Kelly was released December 12, 2001 by Animated Music. With sources of course. :) -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 07:15, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Limited Edition Collector's EPs - 3 CD picture disc set

message: *Artwork and layout by Dale D. Kelly
*released December 12th, 2001 by Animated Music Inc
</blockquote>
So what could be put back? --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord2 06:59, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Something along the lines of, a CD soundtrack, Music in Dragon Ball Z: The History of Trunks (with appropriate nihongo title) was released in Japan on X by Y with twelve tracks by Dream Theater, Petrucci, and Chiho Kiyoka. A 3-Disk Limited Edition picture disk set featuring artwork by Dale Kelly was released December 12, 2001 by Animated Music. With sources of course. :) -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 07:15, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:Cambodian Midget Fighting League

message: This article clearly needs to be brought up to the article quality standards and this blatantly false "hoax" stuff needs to be removed. -68.110.207.23 15:27, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Doc ask? 19:23, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: This was not from the Feb. 26 Ricky Gervais Show on HBO. They are just the same audio from past shows that were rehashed/animated for t.v. It actually was talked about on episode 2, Series 1 of his podcast (not sure of the exact date, I'll try to find out).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.22.21.24 (talk) 19:48, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ricky Gervais Show
Talk:Marques Hagans

message: Removed comparison section due to inaccuracy and lack of citations. Hagans has been compared to Randle El and multi-role receivers, not to McNabb. Also, Hagans became much more noticed after his performance in the Music City Bowl and the combine, therefore the comment regarding "lapse in concentration" and "performance" during the Virginia Tech game is fairly unfounded without citation of some sort. General comments by professionals went up following the Music City Bowl game, not down, someone needs to include links to NFL "experts" if citations are available.
Removed quotations for similar reason. Quotations require citation.
--Scott930 19:31, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of 'Comparison' and 'Quotation' Sections 

message: Nickname is "biscuit".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.82.9.77 (talk) 15:15, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nickname
Talk:Lumber yard

message: Shouldn't this be in Wiktionary?  It's just a definition. - Runcorn 19:40, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It can include (and will, I will add) extended information such as operation, history etc. However even now the article includes information not really appropriate for a dictionary, such as comparisions to Home Depot, and possibly naming of commercial products. --Jake11 21:36, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, fair enough. Runcorn 19:07, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments
Talk:Puma

message: There is also a German WW2 armored car with (official?) name "Puma". SdKfz 234/2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwerer_Panzerspahwagen
What about puma brand?
*Slang usage seems to be invention - he's tried it on Wiktionary as well. Jeff Knaggs (talk) 21:25, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Upper Sandusky, Ohio

message: Is the whole section nonsense/vandalism or is there a grain of truth in it? Please revert accordingly and try to stop that intellectually challenged person who has created the paragraph. <KF> 19:51, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wack Pack]] -- vandalism alert 

message: Is there a reason the reference to Jimmy Dorsey's "Dusk in Upper Sandusky" had been deleted? It was recorded after the musician played a concert at the town's Star Theater in 1936. 15:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular Culture 

message: Did Upper Sandusky really get a new mayor as of just recent? According to the villages website, the mayors name is Scott D. Washburn. OHWiki 20:28, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mayor

message: According to the February 31 article, there is a gravestone in Upper Sandusky that reads "Christiana, wife of John Haag, died February 31, 1869." If true, it would be interesting fact about the town, and perhaps should be included in the popular culture section. Chas (talk) 15:03, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: February 31 Gravestone

message: If
: ... and is referred to as "Upper" by the local residents because it is located on the upper reaches of the Sandusky River;
is supposed to mean that locals frequently say "Upper" when they mean "Upper Sandusky", it should be stated as
: (1) ; the local residents often call it simply "Upper". It bears the formal name "Upper Sandusky" because it is located on the upper reaches of the Sandusky River;
and if they don't use that nick, it should simply say
: (2) ; it bears its name from its location on the upper reaches of the Sandusky River;
It is implausible that it would have the nickname "Upper" for any principal reason other than "Upper Sandusky" being its formal name, and that making "Upper" the obvious and presumably pretty unambiguous nick; if the surprising other situation is actual, mentioning it in the article requires both
: language that makes it obvious that it is not simply the kind of clumsy composition that would create, e.g., the existing ambiguity, and
: a reliable and convincing reference, which means it has to clearly say how the plausible explanation is ruled out, making the otherwise implausible one credible.
If there isn't prompt clarification, (2) -- which will be true even if incomplete -- should replace the current version. --Jerzy•t 05:36, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is "Upper" a slang name for the town? 

message: 80s nerds remember Upper Sandusky as the starting location for Infocom's unique "Leather Goddesses of Phobos" interactive fiction game. Heywassup456 (talk) 19:57, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  random pop culture reference
Talk:Dominion Network

message: Major renovations required here.  This is all wrong.
The Dominion network reached every city and town that had just one CBC English signal.  The Trans-Canada network only reached larger cities where a second station, more often an affiliate than an O&O station, could be signed up.
CJBC Toronto was the main station of the network. CHLO St. Thomas was the London-St. Thomas market's affiliate. When the networks were reconsolidated in 1962, CJBC became redundant, and was later converted to French language; CHLO and other affiliate stations usually became independent in 1962.
The Dominion network was based out of CBL Toronto plus other key stations across the country.
I would like to correct this article as soon as I can.
GBC 19:53, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major rewrite 
Talk:Ebrahim Nabavi

message: His ethnicity is not mentioned on his website, nor specified by any one of the sources. Please provide your references before making changes. --74.12.103.220 (talk) 03:16, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ethnicity
Talk:Saint Louis

message: Sorry, but bolding St.Louis on the Saint Louis dab does not either make sense or match Wiki practice (see the York, Saint John, Saint Paul dabs for example. It might be the biggest city, or the most famous, but then why not bold the Saint, the city was named after? Bridesmill 19:56, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do that if you want, then. The other idea is putting the city link closer to the top (like I have just done....it makes it more consistent with other articles I've seen like Hamilton and Portland). It makes no sense for one of the 2-3 most searched for "Saint Louis"es to only be found as the 18th link down. Kirjtc2 22:47, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have, and will continue to, remove this line when placed in this article (as I have seen others do).  en:Wikipedia is the English language Wikipedia, NOT the United States Wikipedia.  There are more English speakers for whom English is not their native language than the converse, and one can assume, do not think of a city in Missouri above all when searching for this term.  See Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/FAQ#Anglo-American focus and systematic bias and Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias. T L Miles (talk) 15:56, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd vote that 'Saint Louis' by default go to the King of France, after whom all the rest were named. InfernoXV (talk) 14:57, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does not "Usually refer to Saint Louis, Missouri" 

message: Why does :St. Louis redirect to :St. Louis, Missouri rather than to this dab page? --Una Smith (talk) 14:52, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  St. Louis, notice of requested move 

message: there should be a mention/link to Louis IX of France at the top of page as the man for whom almost all of the others on this page are ultimately named?E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:01, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: the saint
Talk:Davis, Oklahoma

message: :I am starting this discussion because earlier today I provided the information to this Wikipedia article about infrastructure, called Transportation. This section exists on many populated place articles. I decided to add the information. In Correct (talk) 04:59, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately this information was removed. The editor went to great lengths to remove EVERY information that I added, according to the history, it said "reverted 22 edits.". The person decided to leave a message onto my talk page stating that if I could find a source about the information, then I can add the information again. I decided to do so by undoing the revert. I did not know which revert to undo, so I reverted every edit (similar to how every of my edits was undone.) As absolutely none of the information that I wrote was promotional material. In Correct (talk) 04:59, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

text: The promotional material had already existed. I did not add the information. The article's history can prove both of this. What I did was add links to Turner Falls which was removed. I believe that this should be added to a "See Also Section." But this "Attractions" section already existed AND STILL EXISTS. I am trying to contribute to the article and I am wrongfully accused of adding promotional information. I wish to do the proofreading myself and remove the actual promotional material. The "transportation" section is NOT promotional and exists on many other populated place articles. If this information is not needed, then I will remove the information that other people added on the other populated place articles. 
In Correct (talk) 04:59, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Do Not Remove Infrastructure Information.

message: Here, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Cities/US_Guideline#Infrastructure
It says: 
The purpose is to describe the settlement as a geographic entity and space. Describe how the settlement exists in the larger region (for example, port on a river, harbor on a sea, agricultural community in the prairies, village in the mountains, suburb of city). The settlement as a geographic space is illustrated best with a map but can be explained by detailing the layout of the transportation infrastructure, neighborhoods, types of residential areas in relation to commercial or industrial spaces, etc.
''
AND
===Transportation===
Include:
#Highways (federal and state), street layout (if notable)''
The information is notable.
In Correct (talk) 05:35, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: I Read Your Essay On Style
Talk:Emma Watson (disambiguation)

message: The main point of disambiguation pages is to inform people of where the disambiguated articles are. Writing links like actress is not only confusing (one would, of course, expect a link that looks like actress to point to an article on actresses), but it misses the main point of disambiguation pages by hiding the name of the disambiguated article. -- Oliver P. 20:01, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk
Talk:St. Andrew's Episcopal School (Maryland)

message: I removed "* 99 % of students attend college" from the general information section. This is practically impossible and the figure needs a cite to suppport. Qaz 20:02, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:United States 40 mm grenades

message: The description of the XM688 states "The usage of such a device is relatively self-explanitory, but the actual combat applications of such a "weapon" must be relatively limited." Well, it isn't self-explanitoty unless you already know a lot about grenades. I have no idea what the XM688 is or why it is unique or specailized based on the text. Someone who knows should make a bit more verbose of a description.
:That because the XM688 isn't a grenade at all. It is a round of ammunition and it fits in a 40mm grenade launcher, but the similarity ends there. The XM688 cartridge fires a rocket motor, that's the entire projectile. The round is loaded into the breech of the weapon and then a long grappling hook with a cup at the base is slid down the barrel. A line is attached to a link on the body of the hook that slides along the body as it flies through the air to maintain stability in flight. Pulling the trigger on the grenade launcher (the XM688 will work in either the M79 or M203, but the preferred weapon is the M79 as the muzzle is clear of any obstructions that the grappling hook could hang up on) fires the round, igniting the rocket motor. The motor pushes the grappling hook up into the air the line trailing along behind it. 
The rounds (6) were issued in a kind of kit bag that included the grappling hook, line, links and other accessories. It was tested in the early 1970s but never issued in any numbers to speak of.70.106.151.93 15:29, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  self-explanitory? 

message: Although I lack the knowledge to fix this article, I hope it is useful for me to point out some problems.
--It dicusses the rounds used for automatic weapons alongside the rounds used by individual weapons. They are not interchangable.
--There is no discussion of the timeline of these weapons.
--The article is shot full of weseal words. An encyclopedia ought to be authoritative. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 11:19, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Many Issues
Talk:Sequential time

message: Please don't delete this - I came here looking for more information after reading the BBC article on this. ---unsigned commment by 165.254.38.126
:Ironic, then, that this article's only reference is the BBC article you came from. There's less information here. Sigh... Melchoir 23:21, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has potential. ĶĩřβȳŤįɱéØ 03:59, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I have been using a simplified (improved: [CC]YYMMDD.HHMMSS..., with mtwrfau (from a local school system convention) optionally replacing the '.' to represent the week day, without interfering with alpna-num sorts) version of the ISO-encouraged YYYY-MM-DD format, since the early '70s when I was introduced to it by the US military.  I have found it to be a persistent benefit for decades of use.  It already had the huge advantages to me and (presumably) the military, of being brief, unambiguous, & easily sort-able by rudimentary, non-proprietary programs, as well as the existing (poorly thought out?) date-time sort function tools of most operating systems. (Ms Windows was capable of presenting either when set carefully.)<BR>
It also has an aesthetic & logical consistency with all other western numbering systems (largest to smallest) which none of the historical (archaic ;) date formats have.  
Although the varied duplex radix format (100, 100, 12, ~30, 24, 60, 60, 100, ...) is subtle in some computation implications, it is still fairly intuitive & rugged.<BR>
I recognize the issues in my use of "intuitive", as well as its inconsistency with some of the fun format puns that take advantage of some of the idiosyncratic historical formats.<BR>
: Ref: ISO 8601 Data elements and interchange formats – Information interchange – Representation of dates and times<BR>
: Ref: ISO/IEC 18014 Information technology – Security techniques – Time-stamping services<BR>
Wikidity (talk) 00:06, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Rational" time format 
Talk:UnCon

message: There are a few too many names in the central section. What I'd like is to break it down by UnCon and have the speakers and their topics listed in the order they appeared in. I have the 2004 program around here somewhere so will throw it in as an example. (Emperor 00:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Big block o' links

message: There is also a long-running (Since 2000) regular (twice a year) private (invite-only) UK IT security conference called the Uncon. See http://www.uncon.org.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.86.213.196 (talk) 09:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The other Uncon
Talk:Belize River

message: The river length of 290 km mentioned in this article may not be accurate. Other sources like the Encyclopædia Britannica, mention a length of 290 km for the Mopan River _and_ the Belize River taken together. Assuming that Brittanica's figure is correct, and considering that the origin of the Belize River is formed by the confluence of the Mopan River and the Macal River, the length of the Belize River should probably range between 140 and 170 km.  Arjuno (talk 03:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  River length
Talk:Mullins River

message: I propose that this article be split in two, to focus on each topic, the Mullins River (river) and Mullins River (village), as the article should not be covering both topics, it should only cover one of the topics. Thus a disambiguation page would appear here, and two new child articles are split from this article; Mullins River, Belize / Mullins River (Belize) would redirect here. -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 11:20, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There is very little information about the river here, though. I think it would be sufficient simply to rephrase the lead. Felix QW (talk) 11:18, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Split apart (2023): River and Village
Talk:Ambergris Caye

message: This should probably be made into a disambiguation, with seperate pages for "Ambergris Caye, Belize" and "Ambergris Caye, Turks & Caicos". -- Infrogmation 15:06, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. ~ Quacks Like a Duck (talk) 17:29, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

message: is it an island? Or part of the Yucatan penisula?
Where's the northern boundary that makes it an island?
:Ambergris Caye is an island in Belize located south of the Mexican state of Quintana Roo. It is separated from the rest of the country and can only be reached on land by a bridge from Mexico. Jeff in CA (talk) 06:34, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Island?
Talk:High Temple

message: --212.123.11.149 (talk) 14:34, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess that there's the potential for enough material to eventually be written on this (and other) specific Mesoamerican buildings & structures to justify its own article, but maybe it should wait until the main Lamanai article is more fully fleshed out. I'd agree that at this point we don't need to go about creating 100's of micro-stubs on individual buildings in the hope they'll eventually be expanded, it seems that that approach would make it more difficult to update relevant facts in the main article(s) as well as the structure-specific articles. However, there's only a few of these at the moment and so perhaps they can be kept around, with the proviso or guideline that any future ones should be expanded upon at the main site's article first, and only broken off into a separate article when there's sufficient material accumulated to justify it. Then again, there may be some structures/buildings which are reasonably well-enough known that it might be expected someone somewhere would be searching for info on it, maybe these could be created as stubs if we don't have the time at present to expand them. They could also be created as redirects I guess, but that would not be my preference at this stage, though open to other arguments.--cjllw | TALK 03:44, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Nim Li Punit

message: * https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ancient-mesoamerica/article/div-classtitlemaya-politics-and-ritual-an-important-new-hieroglyphic-text-on-a-carved-jade-from-belizediv/29177447A9DCD86AA07BA4EDF9BF14CE#
* http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7s96b4gh (http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7s96b4gh.pdf)
* https://www.belizehub.com/2017/02/26/large-mayan-jade-pendant-carved-inscriptions-discovered-belize/
Kaldari (talk) 01:55, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New jade artifact discovered