Talk:Bucharest student movement of 1956

message: political analist and romanian orthodox church contesting the accuracy of tismaneanu's report (no vadim, no goma):
Contraatac al BOR la Raportul Tismaneanu , 
Raportul Tismaneanu – o incercare de falsificare a istoriei Romaniei 
Impostura la varf de Comisie prezidentiala , 
Ucis de Comisia Tismaneanu  Anonimu 08:56, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I can see, the BOR does not cite inaccuracies - just supposed POV (ie: the information is not wrong, it is misused). The information about Dobre that the other source likes to pretend is in the Report isn't actually in the Report. The "source" itself is not reputable, not subject to peer review, and, as pointed out just now, it does not furnish accurate information to be credible enough for contesting the accuracy of another. Reading the statement Civic Media makes, it also appears that they are politically involved up to their necks (they are apparently under constant persecution from the Democratic Party authorities etc.). Dahn 09:05, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Also interesting to note: Civic Media is a platform for the BOR, as stated in the first article. Therefore, criticism provided originates with the spectacular number of one source. And, again, only one claim is about accuracy... and it is inaccurate. Dahn 09:10, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Afil, broken link or no broken link, I think you should read again what I have posted and note what I was answering to. Dahn 21:56, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

text: If it helps, I agree that this article could be written more neutrally and scholarly. But theories about the Tismăneanu Report and quotes from Civic Media have no relevancy whatsover. Dahn 21:54, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If we talk about weasel words, should we not avoid words like shitty? Maybe using academic language would be more appropriate for this forum.
Afil 21:26, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Weasel words

message: In Timisoara also was a student movement in 1956, with many people arrested. Should we create a separate article or a chapter of this article, who should be renamed "Romanian student movement of 1956"?--MariusM 02:39, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Timisoara student movement of 1956

message: The article has been corrected to take care of the objections. Therefore the note at the beginning of the article has been removed. The article is similar to the article Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 which also covers anticommunist student protests. 
Afil 15:37, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article has been corrected 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bucharest student movement of 1956. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061115020438/http://www.epochtimes-romania.com/articles/article_6500.html to http://www.epochtimes-romania.com/articles/article_6500.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070509032613/http://www.php.isn.ethz.ch:80/collections/coll_romania/introduction.cfm? to http://www.php.isn.ethz.ch/collections/coll_romania/introduction.cfm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070905162028/http://www.ziua.net:80/display.php?data=2005-10-26&id=187349 to http://www.ziua.net/display.php?id=187349&data=2005-10-26
*Added  tag to http://www.adevarulonline.ro/2006-10-28/Dosar/loturile-studentilor-arestati-si-condamnati-in-urma-evenimentelor-din-1956_204061.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:00, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified