Talk:LifeLock

message: Yintercept (talk) 19:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  CNN Headline 

message: Someone nominated this article for deletion without discussion.  I think there's enough reason to keep that it shouldn't be deleted without an AFD discussion. Eseymour 22:22, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that this article should NOT be deleted. I saw a Wall Street Journal article about LifeLock and went to its website and never learned any of this information. --Email4jonathan (talk) 22:09, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article may be the only place on the internet where one can find a useful, concise summary of this company with cited sources. I do not believe this article should be deleted. --Gotnostyle (talk) 22:18, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article provides good information on the advertised service. Particularly important is the federal court ruling that the credit alerts cannot be placed by this company. --68.83.105.228 (talk) 00:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion

message: While it's true the la times no longer has the piece up, some articles with quotes from it exist.  For example, one on conservablogs, and a pdf that we can view as html actually is a copy of the post.  Maybe 3 should be replaced with a link to the pdf/html? --TIB (talk) 07:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  LA Times piece 

message: This article seems weighted heavily towards why this company is bad with very little discussion of what it actually does. Some effort should be made to bring the article in line with WP:NPOV. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 18:48, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: NPOV does not mean that it contains an equal amount of praise and blame. It merely means that the available reliable published sources are appropriately represented. What info in what reliable published source do you feel is left out? WAS 4.250 (talk) 21:25, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: How about some information about what the company actually does? Right now it's all about supposed criminal activity of the company and its founder. Without it, the article is giving undue weight to the negative aspects. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 02:11, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleting facts that are negative doesn't make the point of view neutral. One could argue that your edits are an NPOV violation due to their conceivably favorable view of the subject. There is little discussion of what the company does because the company does very little. The things you deleted were notable and true. I think your NPOV edit is wrong, and that the controversy section that existed before your edits was appropriate, neutral, and more informative than what you have left in its place. 68.190.20.28 (talk) 03:40, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: Why does the article not mention Robert Maynard and his continuing connection to LifeLock? I would think that this is very relevant to the trustworthiness of the company. For details, see  and . David (talk) 22:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not add the links yourself? Lots42 (talk) 18:29, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robert Maynard? 

message: This article needs to be updated due to recent court ruling with Lifelock v. Experian. MSNBC Red Tape Chronicles. I would do it myself, but I have neither the time nor the expertise to do so. Also the judges decision has been redacted and is in the process of being reconsidered. Lifelock is moving forward and is no longer issuing credit alerts on behalf of their clients. Im not really sure what they are doing now, but I do know its not that.  Dillard421♂♂ (talk to me) 15:23, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update - September 2009 

message: not sure weather "it's" is encyclopedic language. ^b4z^ (talk) 09:20, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Weather" it's encyclopedic or not doesn't matter; typos can be easily fixed by you rather than having to talk about them on the talk page. Hanxu9 (talk) 13:11, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "It's" 

message: The sentence "The original complaint brought about by Experian, was ruled to be breaching California law by placing fraud alerts on its customer’s credit profiles." means that the original complaint was ruled to be breaching California law. The phrase "Original complaint" is the subject of that sentence. But the remainder of the paragraph leaves it in doubt was to whether the breaching was done by "the complaint" or was done by Lifelock.  Then we have 'The process was said to be costing the credit union millions of dollars a year by “surreptitiously placed hundreds of thousands” of alerts on Experian files “by posing as the consumer,” even when there was no suspicion of identity theft.'  I don't think that Experian is a credit-union. It's a credit-reporting bureau, no? A credit-union is something different, isn't it? The phrase "by posing as the consumer" is just plain grammatically muddy.  What was posing as the consumer?  The "process" was posing as the consumer? Lifelock was posing as the consumer? Who? What? There is a way to put a sentence together by quoting from court papers. This isn't it.68.160.69.34 (talk) 04:28, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please neaten up 

message: I am requesting reversion to an earlier version with actual content, by someone who has followed the development of this article.  I have to wonder whether the current version was written entirely by Lifelock itself.
It seems the article has been sanitized to remove any unfavorable content.  Surely there can be a History section with accurate facts.
Parsiferon (talk) 01:23, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article now reads like an ad 

message: There should be mention of Celebrity Apprentice using the product in association with a task for the show.--Cooly123 02:01, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marketing update 

message: Some sections and sentences are clearly corporate PR. 70.253.68.221 (talk) 15:57, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs better editing 

message: Blog entry from prominent investor on the FTC vs Lifelock settlement that is pretty insightful and shows what the FTC attempts to accomplish in its settlements: http://whohastimeforthis.blogspot.com/2010/03/lifelock-settles-with-ftc.html  Iamchmod (talk) 16:36, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this an appropriate reference link 

message: References for 29, Wired Magazine no longer work / page not found.  Edited with appropriate relevant replacement source.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JennmPrice (talk • contribs) 15:07, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It took me two seconds to find the Wired archive link for that. Please take your SEO strategies elsewhere. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:25, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Wired Reference #29 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on LifeLock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2007/06/lifelock_founde_1/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.forbes.com/markets/commodities/2008/02/21/experian-lifelock-update-markets-equity-cx_md_0221-markets32.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:55, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on LifeLock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140605054029/http://allthingsd.com/20120910/in-the-vault-former-yahoo-exec-hilary-schneider-set-to-join-ipo-bound-lifelock/ to http://allthingsd.com/20120910/in-the-vault-former-yahoo-exec-hilary-schneider-set-to-join-ipo-bound-lifelock
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140605061220/http://searchconcepts.com/2009/08/13/symantec-partners-with-lifelock-to-unite-40m-in-funding/ to http://searchconcepts.com/2009/08/13/symantec-partners-with-lifelock-to-unite-40m-in-funding
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I keep receiving ads from Norton, encouraging me to sign up for this service. But they are not very specific about what the service actually entails. What do customers actually get from them? So I came to this article, which also does not say. "Identity theft protection", sure, but what does that actually mean? How do they purport to defend their customers?
This seems like an obvious question to ask, perhaps the first question about a company or business unit -- what do they do? It is surprising to me that the article doesn't even attempt to answer it. ACW (talk) 20:15, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What do they actually do?