Talk:Deforestation in Brazil

message: /_)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.205.208.219 (talk) 00:27, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *this article needs an overhaul, as it's neutrality is questioned, being excessively referenced to Greenpeace and WWF.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tigerjojo98 (talk • contribs) 17:40, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not according to the article's reference list. danielkueh (talk) 23:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: This entry reads "In 2012, the Amazon was approximately 5.4 million square kilometres, which is only 87% of the Amazon’s original state.[2]", but reference [2] is a review paper from 2008. Therefore it is impossible for it to have any information about deforestation numbers in 2012.  Even more, a quick Internet search of this sentence reveals that the source might be "Earth Snapshot" [*] and that the year is in fact 2001. 
[*] http://www.eosnap.com/deforestation/deforestation-in-brazilian-amazon-rainforest/
Rmolina (talk) 20:17, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Right information 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Deforestation in Brazil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061121225846/http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0329-03.htm to http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0329-03.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071209222459/http://www.cifor.cgiar.org:80/Publications/Corporate/NewsOnline/NewsOnline36/beef_exports.htm to http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/Publications/Corporate/NewsOnline/NewsOnline36/beef_exports.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140204013116/http://atlas.media.mit.edu/explore/tree_map/export/bra/all/show/2010/ to http://atlas.media.mit.edu/explore/tree_map/export/bra/all/show/2010/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080511151726/http://eobglossary.gsfc.nasa.gov/Study/recovery/ to http://eobglossary.gsfc.nasa.gov/Study/recovery/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100604002118/http://www.brazil.org.uk:80/press/speeches_files/20070705.html to http://www.brazil.org.uk/press/speeches_files/20070705.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:07, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hi there, I made an account just for this. I found this questionable paragraph:
There is one simple method though that could eliminate the formation of methane gas, produced by the rotting of trees (which occurs once the trees have been submerged by the water), and which could also reduce the formation of CO², captured/stored in the trees. This method would be the cutting of the trees before the dams are put into operation and the water level is heightened, and selling the wood (hereby using them as timber, for furniture, ...). This way, the CO² stored in the wood is also not emitted immediately, and even if the wood were to be used as firewood (in which case the CO² captured in the trees is indeed emitted), then still no methane would be produced/emitted.
Is this relevant? I feel like it belongs to an article about logging methods or something. I'm going to take the liberty of removing it, feel free to fite me over it
ReiceMcK (talk) 07:19, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Causes > Hydroelectric section 

message: "Cattle emit large amounts of methane" - this is questionable statement. Citation needed. Sure methane is bad but it cattle emits it in negligible amount!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djzatorze (talk • contribs) 18:28, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Causes > Cattle ranching and infrastructure 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Deforestation in Brazil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140806144540/http://www.virtualcentre.org/en/library/key_pub/longshad/A0701E00.htm to http://www.virtualcentre.org/en/library/key_pub/longshad/A0701E00.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/Publications/Corporate/NewsOnline/NewsOnline36/beef_exports.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.brazil.org.uk/press/speeches_files/20070705.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI!  20:58, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: Very unclear what this map is actually showing - I can only assume that the red markings are where deforestation has taken place, but there is no explanation of the map so not sure if this is a correct assumption. Reckon a layperson wouldn't be able to understand what this is trying to show; plus the stats would be so out of date at this point it feels irrelevant/unnecessary to have the map in. Maybe better to replace it with something more up-to-date with a better explanation? OliverEastwood talk 09:16, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Deforestation in Brazil 2002 to 2008" map in Rates section 

message: — Assignment last updated by Sancar27 (talk) 21:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Global Extractivism