lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of museums in North Dakota

message: This list of museums in the state was separated from List of museums in the United States on January 07, 2008. Please see List of museums in the United States for all history prior to that date.
Feel free to include Template:Infobox Museum when adding or editing articles on individual museums. Noroton (talk) 02:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: General Information

message: In February 2008 at Talk:List of museums in the United States, a consensus was reached on this statement on what kind of institutions to include on state museum-list articles:
:Historic houses or halls of fame may be listed if they function as or include public museums -- see Biltmore Estate, Plumb House, Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, and Baseball Hall of Fame for examples. Art galleries that function primarily to sell art should not be listed, but public art museums that use "gallery" as part of their name may be listed. Nature centers and botanical gardens may be listed only if they contain historical or educational exhibits in a museum format.
Also inappropriate for this list are planetariums, aquaria and zoos, which have their own lists. Please follow these criteria when considering additional items for this list, or suggest changes at Talk:List of museums in the United States. Keep in mind there are lists for institutions similar to museums, as noted in the See also section of this article. Noroton (talk) 02:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Inclusion criteria
Talk:List of people from the London Borough of Hackney

message: Hannah Woolley is an important historical character associated with Hackney who needs to be on this list. However, she doesn't easily fit into any of the existing headings, being a writer but not academic, journalist or literature. I have put her under Medicine for now as her status as a amateur physician was significant. I welcome other people's views about the category. OddElly311 (talk) 13:16, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hannah Woolley and limitations of current subheadings 
Talk:Abraham Cruzvillegas

message: I have added a link to a video of the artist talking about his piece Autoconstrucción. Cruzvillegas talks about how it is made and what the ideas behind it are, such as the improvisatory architecture of his parents' house in Mexico. T.Broch (talk) 14:08, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New external link 

message: I put in an artists box, just copying from another artist.  I also took a photo of his installation Autoconstruccion when it was at the Tate, but I can't work out what licence to upload it on.  Any help would be much appreciated.  Mrwikster, 11.49, 23 August 2011,  —Preceding undated comment added 10:49, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uploading picture 

message: Perdon, pero este articulo parece escrito por el mismo cruzvillegas, es bastante evidente en realidad. Esta permitido? Es posible
comprobarlo?
JinX Moon 11-05-2016, Mexico  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.213.194.194 (talk) 07:21, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Veracidad? 
Talk:R&B/Hip-Hop Airplay

message: When did this chart start?  Has it been continues since?  Was it a spin off of another chart? --Bejnar (talk) 19:00, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin

message: I'm currently subscribed to Billboard.biz. If this is Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Airplay, then what is Mainstream R&B/Hip-Hop?
 DominiquesMusic (talk) 18:02, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Airplay, Mainstream R&B/Hip-Hop ? 

message: Note that the methodology used for the R&B/Hip-Hop airplay chart is not the same as what Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs chart used to be. Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs also used to include a sales component from a core set of R&B/hip-hop stores in addition to airplay. To say a song that is No. 1 on the airplay chart does not mean it would have been on the R&B/Hip-Hop songs chart if the old methodology was still being used is not true. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 02:01, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Methodology
Wikipedia talk:Editor's index to Wikipedia

message: Good writing is based on broad mentality Shubham971996 (talk) 10:38, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing 

message: How comprehensive or up to date is this page, really? It seems like a gargantuan task, and I'm not sure what the clear benefit is, since when trying to find a page, it's almost always easier to just search the Wikipedia namespace. I'd suggest either finding a way to automate the maintenance of this page, or just marking it as historical and abandoning it.  talk 08:50, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , I concur. I encountered this page while seeking resources to support a WikiProject. Many links were themselves historical, or should have been. I contemplated updating that section based on my recent experience but decided there were other better sources already. —¿philoserf? (talk) 08:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

text: The benefit for me is that it helps me find things that I didn't know to search for. I often come to this page, pick a random letter, and scan the list; I almost always learn about something that I didn't know was a thing. It's also helpful for finding a specific page about a subject that has a lot of related pages, as the search box dropdown is so literal.  Schazjmd (talk) 13:48, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  if you are still using this page, feel free to delete lines with obsolete links. – Fayenatic London 10:27, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Will do, @Fayenatic london, thanks! Schazjmd (talk) 13:28, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purpose of this index?
Talk:Elektra chord

message: When it talks about complement does it mean the seven notes that are not in the Electra chord? I think that is right because the seven other notes make the dominant thirteenth of G minor (D F# A C Eb G Bb). There is a link to an article called Complement (music) but it is about something else.
How can a chord be monomaniacal? Teenly (talk) 22:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two questions 

message: "The Elektra chord is a 'complexly dissonant signature-chord' and motivic elaboration..." Of what is it an elaboration?
"The Elektra chord's complement appears at important points and the two chords form a 10-note pitch collection..." If Teenly's 
conjecture about the meaning of the term "complement" in this context is correct — and I'm sure it is — then how can any chord and its complement form a pitch collection of other than 12 notes? Fenneck (talk) 13:25, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two more questions 

message: I question the statement that the Elektra chord appears in Debussy's "Feuilles Mortes".  I just looked at the score for that piece (no. 2 in Preludes, Book 2), and can't find it anywhere (in any key - it is reasonable to suppose that a named chord like this can be transposed to any key without losing its essential character, and without losing the name).
I did find chords whose constituent notes would form the Elektra chord if rearranged in vertical order, and I assume whoever added the reference to Debussy was thinking of this.  But with complex chords like this, inverting the notes - in particular putting a different note in the bass - so radically changes the nature of the chord that I don't believe it would be appropriate to regard it as being the same.  For instance, suppose we use the given example of the Elektra chord in the article: E B C# E# G#, from the bass upwards (or E B Db F Ab - I would accept that in ambiguous chords of this sort, enharmonic spelling can be variable, and makes no difference to what you hear).  To arrange these notes into the type of chord Debussy uses, you would have to arrange them thus (from the bass upwards): C# G# E# B E (or Db Ab F B E).  If you try this out on the piano and then compare it with the Elektra chord, you will see how utterly different these sound - like totally different chords, in fact.  For this reason, I feel the Debussy example should be removed, although if someone can show that the Elektra chord is defined solely by the constituent notes and not by the order they are arranged vertically, I guess the Debussy example could remain.  But if that is the case, there are probably hundreds of classical pieces from the late 19th century that use the chord, not to mention probably thousands of jazz pieces, blues pieces, and so on. M.J.E. (talk) 16:48, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debussy example questionable.
Talk:Helen Jepson

message: Seymour's full name is John Laurence Seymour, according to the New York Times obituary cited in the notes. Herbivore (talk) 04:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:ShadowsCommons

message: For cases where neither image should be deleted, should be recommend renaming the local image to avoid confusion? Superm401 - Talk 15:29, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: There is a discussion regarding automatic categorisation of images at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#Wikipedia/Commons duplicate images that concerns this template.
--David Göthberg (talk) 01:02, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Automatic categorisation 

message: The final bullet of this template states: "Nominate the file for deletion if ..."; I believe the method of nomination should be linked here, but I'm unsure of the best link. Will the keepers of this template help determine the best link here, and perhaps add a live link in the template as well? Thank you.--John Cline (talk) 19:33, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I see what you mean; understand, and agree.--John Cline (talk) 20:04, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nominate the file for deletion 

message: There is a bot proposal to add this template to candidate pages automatically: Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/GreenC bot 10 -- GreenC 07:40, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The bot is approved. -- GreenC 18:12, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot proposal
Talk:Böttcherstraße

message: Modersohn-Becker or Becker-Modersohn? Look here. --Godewind (talk) 08:57, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which is the correct Name? 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Lichtbringer ("Bringer of Light") by Bernhard Hoetger (1936).jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on October 8, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-10-08. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:00, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Lichtbringer ("Bringer of Light") by Bernhard Hoetger (1936).jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Babakina caprinsulensis

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:49, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Alain Bernard

message: Should we say something about how he told the American relay team that he would beat them, and then he got Phelps'd?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmh010 (talk • contribs) 00:41, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  he got Phelps'd? 

message: On account of his amazing physique the French apparently have a Spitting Image style caricature of Bernard; according to a BBC commentator it's essentially just... A Muscle.  I've come across a reference to a graphic in a magazine, it's possible that's what was being referred to.  Any info on this or a French view generally would be useful. Hakluyt bean (talk) 03:28, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  French view 

message: please remove nickname . Alain Bernard hasn't nickname.
: Looks like someone already removed it. Seems it was unsourced anyway. Pyrospirit (talk · contribs) 23:49, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nickname 
Category talk:Dance competitions

message: What is the purpose of this page? Is it supposed to be a list of dance competition events? How is it different from :Category:Competitive dance? Lambtron (talk) 15:40, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem soldved: the name updated to :Category:Dance competition television shows. -Loginnigol 02:01, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of awards received by Destiny's Child

message: World's Best Group
http://www.worldmusicawards.com/#!worlds-best-group/c15nn
World's Best Album
http://www.worldmusicawards.com/#!worlds-best-album/c1rv6
World's Best Song
http://www.worldmusicawards.com/#!worlds-best-song/ct9a  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.19.165.217 (talk) 22:25, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  WORLD MUSIC AWARDS 2013 NOMINEES
Talk:KMEHR

message: Hello, 
I am an Australian student currently involved in an informatics university project and have been asked to make some suggestions to improve this page. 
Firstly I feel this article could be better improved with the use of referencing, as per the Wikipedia basic guidelines http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WikipediaReferencing.pdf. 
Also although this Wikipedia page is correct, it is very limited in areas. I suggest the expansion and elaboration of this article using the official KMEHR government accredited website https://www.ehealth.fgov.be/standards/kmehr/content/page/home.
Smirwin88 (talk)   —Preceding undated comment added 00:12, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

message: Great description and history of KMEHR. I know there maybe limited information on this due to only being implemented in one country but is there any information on how effective they think it is for the country? Shaunamcegan (talk) 08:02, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: FEEDBACK
Talk:Kikuyu Central Association

message: Removed Dedan Kimathi. Had nothing to to with KCA itself - seems to get organized only after 1945 when KCA had been disbanded already. --Kipala (talk) 15:52, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:United States men's national beach soccer team

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :United States national beach soccer team. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 31#United States national beach soccer team until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Seany91 (talk) 07:54, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "United States national beach soccer team" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:4th Airlift Squadron

message: http://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/A-delicate-mission-for-nuclear-bomb-squad-1236340.php Warped War (talk) 17:02, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: For some reason, the 4th's nuke mission is not mentioned at all. Censorship? 2601:8:9180:604:219:D1FF:FEA8:25F0 (talk) 04:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  For inclusion?
Talk:Sutherland–Hodgman algorithm

message: This article would need images to make it easier to understand. Good examples for the images can be found here http://www.cs.drexel.edu/~david/Classes/CS430/Lectures/L-05_Polygons.6.pdf
:There is a free image on commons  83.5.93.48 (talk) 12:07, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Images needed

message: I'm certain the pseudocode presented here is inaccurate - by testing points for inclusion in the clip plane rather than testing them sequentially against the infinitely-extended clip plane edges (as in the diagrams above), the point of the algorithm is missed and bugs are introduced.  For example, the leftmost line on the capital W in the graphical example would be clipped entirely because neither of its endpoints lie within the clip plane; the desired behaviour is, of course, to clip it to two edges of the clip plane as shown.
Unless anyone steps in here to point out an error in my thinking, I'll rewrite the algorithm within the next day or two.  Comments?
Cooperised (talk) 17:06, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccurate algorithm?
Talk:San Felice Circeo

message: I'm doubtful that in Roman times, people would believe a town in central Italy (and therefore near Rome) to be the home of a goddess (at least in the literal sense). Someone the Person (talk) 23:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact, also Rome was a mere village before conquering the world. And anyway there were many places in Italy where Gods were believed to be (Etna, the seat of Ephestus etc) --Attilios (talk) 17:48, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've deleted it since Aeaea was more widely believed to be her home. We could include it as a fiction for tourists perpetrated by islanders. Student7 (talk) 00:40, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Home of Circe?
Talk:Dalbavancin

message: Article could use references to clinical trial details and results. - Rod57 (talk) 12:28, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  clinical trial details and results 

message: Non-inferior to vancomycin +/- linezolid. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1310480 JFW | T@lk 14:16, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trial 

message: The chemical and physical data and the chemical structure suggest that Dalbavancin is one defined molecule. However, as per the EMA public assessment report it is a mixture of five molecules: 
Dalbavancin A0 and A1, Dalbavancin B0, B1 and B2. They differ from one another primarily in the length and/or branching of their respective fatty acid side chains.
See page 10
http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Public_assessment_report/human/002840/WC500183871.pdf
--Kereul (talk) 17:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dalbavancin is a mixture of 5 different molecules 

message: Need to take rash away 2600:1012:B10A:68BE:411:73F:FFCA:2AC6 (talk) 05:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been three day and it getting worse 2600:1012:B10A:68BE:411:73F:FFCA:2AC6 (talk) 05:30, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What do I use for it to tack rash away
Talk:Ventotene

message: An account of the capture of the German garrison on Ventotene by US paratroopers is told in John Steinbeck's Once There Was A War, a collection of his dispatches as a correspondent during WWII. See the final six stories. Bluedawe 10:32, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  German Radar Garrison 
Talk:Arif Hussain Hussaini

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 19:00, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag
Talk:Allison Roe

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB 02:16, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Regrooving the Dream

message: The information contained in this article is mostly the list of songs and personnel for the Patty Larkin album Regrooving the Dream.  Yes, the same information may be found on her web site, but the information is not copyrighted, and I actually wrote it down from the CD itself.  There is no copyvio here.  --  Couillaud (talk) 16:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio
Talk:Arnold Air Force Base

message: The article includes mention that it "incorporates text from" a stated source.  It is not proper sourcing to copy text without putting into quotes and sourcing by footnote references.  If text is reworded by wikipedia editor, the quotes but not the sourcing can be dropped. In the second paragraph, I observe text that is copied directly from that source without use of quotes.  Although there is other wikipedia editor writing and another source in the article, all of the other writing is impugned by mixing it up with copied text, requiring the tag and category for the article suggesting it is merely copied material.  Why not identify the copied text, put it in quotes, and then the tag/category would be unnecessary.  Sincerely, doncram (talk) 21:50, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied text in article 

message: * A particularly useful picture or graphic -- yes
* Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic -- yes
* A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic  -- yes
* Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article -- yes
:: Meets Start rating, will update. LanceBarber (talk) 02:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start rating check-off list from WikiProject Aviation: 

message: The article meets the following five criteria: 
# It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. -- marginally yes, needs work.
# It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --yes
# It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -- yes 
# It is free from major grammatical errors. -- yes 
# It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -- yes
:: Needs ref work for B-class rating. LanceBarber (talk) 02:37, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preliminary B-class rating checklist: