lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nancy Ward

message: She is the last woman to receive the title of Beloved Woman until the late 20th century  Who since then?  Possibly Wilma Mankiller? -Corvus cornix
:Maggie Wachacha, Eastern Band Cherokee. -Uyvsdi (talk) 23:33, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Beloved woman

message: Someone has fleshed out this entry since I last looked at it, and added some great detail. Please use in-line sources and footnote these great contributions. This article has some real potential now. Regards, MarmadukePercy (talk) 12:24, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neat stuff 

message: Colonial implies at some level being under the power of a foriegn authorit.  Nanvcy Ward never recognied auhority beyond the Cherokees.  He should not be classed as colonial.  Her father may have been of European descent (although this is disputed) and her husband may have been European, but this no more made her European than any other out marriage.  She lived in Cherokee land, in a place under Cherokee government.  She was not within the direct area of British control.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:08, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This is one of a number of discussions (started by John Pack Lambert) that are forked from Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2012 November 16#Category:Tennessee colonial people. Rather than conduct discussions of this topic in a dozen different places, let's have just one discussion. Please continue the discussion at the WP:CFD page. --Orlady (talk) 06:07, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not colonial
Talk:Joseph-Goderic Blanchet

message: I think the article has the wrong name, see:
*Biography at the Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online
Note there is no accent in the variant spelling as Goderic. DoCB is very careful about this things. Fawcett5 06:11, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: And, unfortunately, the Parliament of Canada site is not careful at all and often spells the same person's name several different ways. --Big_Iron 12:08, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NAME?
Talk:Gulf of Naples

message: I removed the sentence "The towns of Sorrento, Positano and the Amalfi Coast line the Italian shore of the gulf." Positano and Amalfi Coast are on the Southern side of the Sorrentine Peninsula and therefore are not on the shores of the Gulf of Naples. Furthermore, I'm not sure what is meant by "Italian shore". I retained the link to the town of Sorrento. --Chino 06:18, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This Gulf has nothing to do with the Black Sea, changed it to read "opens in the west to the Tyrrhenian Sea".
Also, Mount Everest is nowhere near Italy, removed any reference to that.
Lastly, removed "the Peninsula separates it from the Palatine Hill," which is incorrect.  Palatine Hill is in Roma, too far north to be associated with the Gulf of Naples.  -- Windsor, 20070407:1700 UTC
I can't seem to find any other stories about these lost torpedoes other than the short article in the Independant. I think this should be removed.
84.83.237.103 (talk) 16:44, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  corrections 

message: I can't seem to find any other stories about these lost torpedoes other than the short article in the Independant. I think this should be removed.
84.83.237.103 (talk) 16:46, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Scaramella cites the IAEA report which mentions that an unconfirmed submarine accident may have happened in the Gulf of Naples. The idea that it was nuclear torpedos, and the amount of them are details he added himself. I will remove the section entirely since it simply seems to be a rumour, and this comment is sufficient for future reassessment. Link to cited article for future reference. JSory (talk) 22:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  lost torpedoes in bay of naples 

message: I know that the Italian is Golfo di Napoli, but the name is usually rendered in English as "Bay of Naples".  The English language sources of the page (the Independent article, and the Olympics venues list) both use "Bay".  A Google search for "Gulf of Naples" returns 17m matches; searching for "Bay of Naples" gives 73m matches. Scarabocchio (talk) 18:56, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gulf -> Bay of Naples?
Talk:Korean art

message: I suggest that Korean sculpture and List of Korean ceramic artists and sculptors be merged into Korean art#Ceramics and sculpture. 126.234.121.176 (talk) 05:06, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: 126.167.189.172 (talk) 05:54, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Korean mask

message: Korean Believe in spirit and shamans their masks are devised into two mask is used for excorcism and religious cerymonies  124.105.80.121 (talk) 07:54, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untiltled

message: Korean masks have a long tradition going back at least 5000 years.
Can you prove by Archaeological findings?
--219.125.102.158 16:41, 24 June 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  5000 Years 

message: Updated, any comments post to POofYS Dated 04:05, 8 April 2005.  69.158.147.167 (talk) 07:36, 8 April 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated

message: What's "duck wood?"  I suspect this is just a typo, but I can't figure out what it was meant to say.  Perhaps dark wood?  --Reuben 18:38, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it's a mistranslation of 오리나무 ("duck tree"), aka Alnus japonica or the Japanese Alder.  Fixed now.  Cheers, -- Visviva 01:22, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, good catch.  --Reuben 01:33, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duck wood?
Talk:Korean calligraphy

message: Updated, any comments post to POofYS Dated 04:05, 8 April 2005.
----
The article used to end in:
"Thus in this article we shall divide the history into Korean calligraphy in languages not purely Korean as the first part of this article; and the new approach to Korean calligraphy in the Korean language in the second part of the article."
this implies it was copy&pasted from a research paper without proper mentioning of the author, which is potentially bad practice I guess? (clem 22:01, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: What is this phrase that is used in the article, in reference to modern hangul calligraphy?  Is this 종숭? This makes no sense to me. Jyg (talk) 19:01, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Or 종성 (final consonant, e.g. ㄱ in 책). But it still doesn't make sense and I think the whole paragraph (added by an IP) may be removed. Seudo (talk) 18:43, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jong-sung? 
Talk:Confucian art

message: Created, earlier by the same hand. Updated, any comments post to POofYS Dated 04:05, 8 April 2005.
In its present state the article makes little sense, but might be improved. The nearest parallel in Chinese I could find is :zh:儒教文化 (Confucian culture) - not especially elaborated too, but with some potential. Rename?--Shanghainese.ua (talk) 08:49, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Template talk:Wikisourcepar

message: The logo's alt text reads "Wikibooks", when it should be "Wikisource". --suruena 08:39, 2005 Apr 8 (UTC)
:I corrected that. jni 12:48, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate text of the logo 

message: I just noticed today that the mechanism for linking to Wikisource has been broken by Wikisource's transition to a partly language-specific format. s:Xor swap algorithm, for example, leads to an empty page on en.wikisource.org, rather than to the Xor swap algorithm page on wikisource.org. This has caused a lot of mistaken removals of  and  links that are still accurate. For the moment, I've changed the links in these templates to external-link formats. Once the problem has been fixed, the old :s: format can be restored. --Quuxplusone 17:07, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm... looks like there's no easy way to get an external link to do what's needed here. So I've left it still broken, but in a more obvious way. Hopefully the fix to :s: won't be long in coming. I don't know where to post to alert the maintainers that there's a problem. --Quuxplusone 17:13, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikisource :s: broken
Talk:Elimelech of Lizhensk

message: I see in one part of the article that Elimelech of Lizhensk was born in Galicia, but in another part of the article that he was born in Tykocin, which is nowhere near Galicia (rather, it's near Lithuania).  I saw in the YIVO Encyclopedia that he was born in the district of Tykocin, but I saw in the Wikipedia article on Zusya of Hanipoli (Elimelech's brother) that they were both born in Tarnow, in Galicia.  Who was born where exactly?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Therav (talk • contribs) 17:27, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace 

message: The is a new rabbi in London 2001:978:3C0B:20E2:2023:5B1F:2800:F815 (talk) 17:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New rabbi
Category talk:Chess players

message: Throughout the Sportspeople categories, I've been removing individuals from main listings and making sure they were under their nationalities instead. So now, for example, all individuals in :Category:Snooker players are just listed under nationality rather than under the main listing. There's just two categories that I haven't turned my attention to, :Category:Poker players and this one. I don't want to do anything to upset the distinctions you've drawn here, but is there a reason that, say, Isidor Gunsberg is listed both in the main listing and :Category:Hungarian chess players? Please enlighten me.--Mike Selinker 19:08, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorization by nationality 

message: Since this category is limited to non-grandmasters, and FIDE first awarded the title in 1950. (I think the czar designated the first five finishers at a tournament circa 1910 as "grandmasters" (I think it was Lasker, Rubinstein, Marshall, Tarrasch, Capablanca or something like that -- maybe not Capa, I forget.  Dunno if Wikipedia considers those five "grandmasters.") But in any event, the relative recency of the title means that people like Morphy and Steinitz are not in the categories for either grandmasters or chess players. This seems screwed up, although I'm not sure what to do about it.
:Five chess masters who played in a final at Sankt Petersburg 1914  (1°Lasker, 2°Capablanca, 3°Aljechin (Alekhine), 4°Tarrasch, 5°Marshall) were awarded the Grandmaster title by tzar Nicolas II Romanov. Another, who played in first phase of the tournament (6°-7°Bernstein and Rubinstein, 8°Nimzowitsch, 9°-10°Blackburne and Janowski, 11°Gunsberg) - not.  
It means that till 1950, only that Russian tzar is an authority for many chess formalists on the GM title. Mibelz 22:17, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about strong players before the GM title existed? 

message: This category was deleted, see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_November_5#Category:Amateur_chess_players. – Fayenatic London 16:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amateur chess players
Talk:Brian Darling

message: Darling admitted to writing the memo but not to circulating it. The matter of its circulation is disputed by Martinez who says that he had a single copy which he gave to Harkin. Some Democrats claimed that there was circulation of the memo among Republicans, which they deny. The distribution of the memo on the Senate floor is also argued to be a violation of its rules as well. I'm editing to state that the matter of its circulation remains disputed. If there's an admission forthcoming from Martinez or Darling regarding a different role in its circulation, then we will need to revisit this.
Newsbull is an advocacy site which presents the Republican version of the circulation dispute.--patsw 09:41, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no dispute here. One year later, no evidence has surfaced that a Republican senator other than Martinez had a copy. I will edit the page accordingly.--24.55.228.56 14:51, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Circulation'' of the memo is disputed
Template talk:TextLicenseFreeUse

message: I request that this template be moved to :Category:Wikipedia copyright templates. It doesn't belong in :Category:Copyright user templates it should only be for userboxes. Catfurball (talk) 17:14, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: (consider this a BRD) - this is a user template, it is meant to be used by a user - to place on their own page.  It is not for licensing media.  That it is not in the shape of a traditional userbox doesn't make it any less user-specific. (Also combined all these to one request as it is all the same matter). — xaosflux Talk 18:32, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like there is actually a big sloppy mess of categorization going on here - so we should probably get a wider discussion going as to the best direction.  Notably your requested 'to' category is not listed as a "userboxes" category.  There certainly is use of categorizing these, and making it clear that there is a difference between templates intended to be used by a user on their own page, and templates to be placed on media descriptions. — xaosflux Talk 18:38, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: (Note, you will not need to reactivate all the individual ER's whichever way this goes, it can just be done once above). — xaosflux Talk 18:50, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we just need better documentation on the two category pages. One should say "This cat is for templates that go on User pages" and the other should say "This cat is for templates that go on File pages." Or something like that, maybe with a bit more nuance of which I am not aware. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:13, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 26 July 2021
Wikipedia talk:666,666th pool

message: I say hexhexhexium, or possibly List of people vanished in the Rapture. Nickptar 18:28, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  What will the article be? 

message: Well I'm going to.
--Mark J 19:17, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can I vote more than once? 

message: I propose a one-week mortorium on the creation of new articles.  There are simply too many already in existence (and it would greatly enhance my odds of winning this pool).  Wikipedians may of course continue to edit existing articles. Rast 14:17, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
:That's just silly! What we really need to do is start deleting more articles -- Joolz 16:13, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop making articles! 

message: Whattup with User:Kostja picking the same date as me, with no time difference?   Bastahdz.  —RaD Man (talk) 06:19, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless he means 16:49?  Kostja?  —RaD Man (talk) 06:24, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

text: He didn't sign it properly, either; "August 8th: Kostja (Talk) 16:49, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Then obviously time travel is involved, so he will be the winner. Unless his vote causes the time to change... Nickptar 21:03, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone stole my date! 

message: And what was the 666,666th article?  :)  —RaD Man (talk) 02:26, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Holy crap its coming soon. The WikiApocylapse is coming! Better join the church! Redwolf24 04:27, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

text: Another user took a better shot, so I am going to delete my image and we could use the one on the main page instead. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 15:22, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  So who won? 

message: What was the exact time of creation of the 666,666th article? Up to one minute.  — JIP | Talk 08:00, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Once we figure out what article got it, we go to New Pages and we can get the exact time it was posted. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 08:01, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I hear that 666666 (the original 666,666th article) was deleted pretty much right after its creation. Is it possible to find out the exact time when it was created? Or otherwise, can we find out the 666,667th article (which should now be the 666,666th one)? — JIP | Talk 14:03, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That article was deleted at 06:45, restored at 06:46 and then deleted again at 06:49 ;) -- Joolz 16:50, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exact time of 666,666th article? 

message: Wasn't there two winners?  Project2501a had as his guess Thursday. I guess technically he was sort of right.  Well, I'm going to give Neutrality 99% of the win, and Project2501a can have 1%. Nice work to all who were close. --Lord Voldemort (Dark Mark) 13:50, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I hear Sasquatch might be up for some honors (or stoning).  Oh - wait.  I forgot the marriage bit. Ha. Never mind.  --Mothperson cocoon 13:59, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 Winners?
Talk:Institute of Contemporary Arts

message: Their website has no history or any background. I cant even find out when it was founded (late 1950s?). Justinc 10:09, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed information about 2007 shows at the gallery, more promotional than informative. The mobile photography show is copied from the ICA website .--Ethicoaestheticist 11:55, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Promotional material

message: The photo is of the public/main entrance which is on The Mall (London). The postal address is on the opposite end of the building on Carlton House Terrace. Will modify entry to reflect this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Irritant (talk • contribs) 21:17, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Postal address doesn't conform to photo of main entrance
Talk:Pearl Harbor (film)

message: The Lexington mentioned in the article was not a "Essex class carrier". That was the second Lexington, commissioned in 1943. The Lexington in service at the time of the Doolittle raid was a converted battlecruiser commissioned in 1927,and lost one month after the Doolittle raid at the Battle of the Coral Sea.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.187.28.253 (talk) 18:04, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: While it's true that the original Lexington that was in service at the time of the Doolittle raid was a converted battlecruiser, the Lexington used to represent the Hornet in the Film was the later Lexington, the updated Essex-class. So the article is correct. -B- (talk) 16:05, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  USS Lexington 

message: see above 2001:1C00:1215:400:E569:BE4B:3CEA:A165 (talk) 07:16, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  the image of the A6M3 is actually a A6M5
Talk:Jared Fogle

message: The article currently reads:
A three-part documentary film about Fogle and his crimes called Jared from Subway: Catching A Monster will be broadcast on the ID pay TV network in March 2023.
"will be" should be changed to "was", as the documentary has now been broadcast. Also "film" should possibly be more accurately changed to "series". 67.240.255.23 (talk) 01:32, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change to past tense 

message: I think we can agree that we only need to mention the conviction once in the first paragraph, right?
This has been discussed before, in August 2021. Please read that discussion. GA-RT-22 (talk) 21:19, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order in the lead 

message: Fogle was brought up in a Jewish household by father Norman Fogle and mother Adrienne Fogle. 2605:A601:A720:4100:E4FE:CADE:3D5F:8FA4 (talk) 22:42, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: But is that relevant? Bkatcher (talk) 03:04, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's super common to mention someone's religious upbringing in their biography, yes Red Slash 21:28, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: His Jewish upbringing is already mentioned in the "Early life" section. Cullen328 (talk) 21:31, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upbringing Religion 

message: There was a template to convert his pant size from inches to centimeters, which I changed to straight text because it didn't produce a grammatically (or numerically) correct result.  The template produced "62 in (160 cm) pants"; for encyclopedic writing, it should be "62-inch (157-centimeter) pants".  First, since the initial measurement isn't rounded to the tens, the conversion shouldn't be either.  Using the common conversion factor of 2.48 cm = 1 in, 62 converts to 157.48, which should then be rounded to 157, not 160.  (This strikes me as an error in the template.)  Second, according to the Template:Cvt page, "in" should have resulted in "inches", so I don't know what happened there but it would have been incorrect anyway. Third, abbreviations shouldn't be used in formal writing.  Fourth, the hyphen is required grammatically and to make sense (and I couldn't get it to work in the template).  Lastly, since this is a static number, it's not necessary to have a template formula-- it's never going to have to be converted again, so plain text is adequate. Ghost writer's cat (talk) 17:24, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary template
Talk:Proto-Mongols

message: I notice that his name is spelt like this here but it is spelt Genghis in this article an in the Mongol Empire.  We should have consistency within Wikipedia.  --Peacenik 10:55, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: The first long section is directly copied and pasted from one of the first websites that pops up when you sear History of Mongolia on Google. 
Sedonaarizona 05:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 

message: This is beyond the pale. Most of this article has no inline references. Until this article is verified, it's nothing more than Original Research. 50.111.38.72 (talk) 18:21, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  No References - Original Research? 

message: :There are not article called proto-Turks, proto-Chinese, etc. It can be merged into Mongols also, most of the article is simply made up, WP:OR. Beshogur (talk) 15:54, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:GNG is met so the article isn't getting merged into anything else... Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:19, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure if we're looking at the same article. This article has indeed many problems. Beshogur (talk) 18:04, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  deletion?
Talk:United States congressional delegations from New Mexico

message: I plan to make at the very least stub biographies, but hopefully more in-depth biographies, for everyone elected by New Mexico to the Senate and House (I doubt I'll be able to find much info on Delegates though). However, I don't think I am good at writing Biography's. So, anyone want to help with technical editing to make the biographies sound better? I'll compile the facts, I just probably need help making the format and content clearer. I hope to get all the Senators done first before moving onto the House. YourNickname 12:07, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Biographies