Talk:AmigaOne

message: In last days I added references for most informations on AmigaOne page. I think this article needs even more care, but I don´t want to make any sustantial changes without approval of other editors. What changes I have in mind:
1. Structure and basic conception. Article is split in to "History" and "Current Status" sections. I assume this is based on status prior to 2009 Settlement Agreement (when AmigaOnes weren´t in productions), this Settlement Agreement - important for AmigaOne license - is also not mentioned in current article. See my sandobox page for possible new structure: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pavlor/sandbox
2. Lead. X1000 announcement should by replaced by more general informations (eg. about outcome of 2009 Settlement Agreement etc.).
3. Models and variants. I think table could be upgraded with more informations (like tables in articles of various Apple computers). Is it necessary to list also still not-released computers (like X5000/X3500)? We did that mistake with AmigaOne netbook. Maybe it would be better to wait for actual release.
Edit: My idea of new table is now on my sandbox page.Pavlor (talk) 11:50, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody responded, so I did that change (1.; 2.; 3. - removed X3500/X5000 models, we can add them when released, I have their entries in my Sandbox page). Still to do: 4. and pictures (uA1 was removed, we need to find suitable image for original AmigaOne series).Pavlor (talk) 10:09, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: My recent changes nad suggestions for future

message: I see there were (are) some fights for the very first words of this article. Although AmigaOne was (according to Bill McEwen in 2002) intended for "rebirth of the Amiga desktop platform", I think it would be better to use plain word "computer" for the initial description - it really is not necessary to repeat what is obvious (AmigaOne is now de facto PowerPC Amiga desktop platform).  For the AmigaOne article I used "series of Amiga branded computers", but there are some people reverting it to "Amiga" without any discussion. Your opinions?--Pavlor (talk) 07:45, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I propose we revert back to April 2011 version. Is it a "computer platform" or "Amiga" or what is only minor detail and we should be able to find concensus. Xorxos (talk) 19:53, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

text: How Eyetech called it? Did they market it as Amiga platform, PowerPC platform or what? Xorxos (talk) 19:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I fear "Amiga" vs "computer" is not minor detail - number of edits on this field is really big. Eyetech never marketed its computer as "Amiga", it wasn´t even necessary, because AmigaOne was then sole new desktop platform for AmigaOS. It ever was computer intended to run AmigaOS. For someone it was Amiga, but this word is full of meanings and thus (in my point of view) unsuitable for article in encyclopedia.--Pavlor (talk) 20:21, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: fights for "Amiga" vs "computer" in the summary

message: The AmigaOne X1000 page should be deleted or at the very least merged into the AmigaOne page. The AmigaOne X1000 is not available for sale, and only a handful of prototypes exist. It's manufacturer, A-eon, has not even determined the specifications of such primary system components as the CPU. When A-eon first appeared they claimed the product would be released before Summer 2010, no product was released. No new release date has been provided. For all practical purposes the AmigaOne X1000 does not yet exist and has had no meaningful impact in the world of computing.
----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Edarticle (talk • contribs) 20:51, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: AmigaOne X1000 page is blatant marketing

message: AmigaONE is a brand of computer on the market since two years ago.
you can't cancelt his evidence and if you consider Wikipedia a serious Encyclopedia then start deleting all invoices of:
Apple Lisa
Acorn BBC
Sinclair QL
Commodore 65
...And so, and more, and so on...
The fact that these computers had a little market, and had just little/medium/great impact in the history of computing does not prevent they have not existed for real and should to be mentioned into an Encyclopedia. Even if they had poor userbase.
By the way it si not the first pirating attempt to delete Amiga invoices here on Wikipedia, or worst to modify in order to let it be underestimated or keep it away from the eyes of readers.
Sure it seems that just to hear the soud of "Amiga" name makes many people crazy.
Prevent these morons to subvert history.
Keep Amiga invioces safe to let Wikipedia be a honest serious and well balanced Encyclopedia letting all voices to speak with democracy, and keeping a decent point of view, preserving the history. Even big/little phenomena as AmigaONE. 
3000 AmigaONE happy users, who use their machines with profict ask this to you all.
By the way check just the thousands of occurrences of AmigaONE in google:
With respect:
--Raffaele Megabyte 03:25, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion? Don't be silly!

message: Is there any source for such new AmigaOne model? Source EVIL-MCDUCK linked is for SAM460CR motherboard, not AmigaOne. I will look for more informations, but without reliable support for "AmigaOne 500 CR" model, entire entry will be removed.Pavlor (talk) 06:32, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I see "AmigaOne 500 CR" is called by ACube simply "AmigaOne 500" and uses SAM460CR motherboard. Source for availability date is still missing.Pavlor (talk) 19:17, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: AmigaOne 500 CR

message: I see an unregistred editor changed title of this section to "AmigaOne by A-Eon Technology (2010- )". I think such title is not right: 
1) AmigaOne licence belongs to Hyperion as part of 2009 Settlement Agreement with Amiga.Inc. 
2) A-Eon is not sole company marketing AmigaOne computers. To be even more precise - AmigaOne 500 from ACube entered marked even before X1000.
3) Both ACube and A-Eon have rights to AmigaOne name from the very same source - Hyperion.
4) I wonder why dating this section since 2010 (X1000 announcement), why not 2011 (A1-500 release) or 2012 (X1000 release)... Better to stay by 2009 - year when AmigaOne licence was granted to Hyperion creating legal basis for all subsequent AmigaOne computers.
I reverted back to original wording, but I´m open to any change, if explained properly.Pavlor (talk) 18:21, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: AmigaOne by Hyperion Entertainment (2009- )

message: MorphOS 3.8 is not yet released and reference is nearly 3 years old. There is no public version of MorphOS for any AmigaOne board. Better to wait for actual release, but I will not remove this information.Pavlor (talk) 16:13, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. I was mistaken when I saw MorphOS 3.8 running on new AmigaOne. Edited... Xorxos (talk) 13:11, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: MorphOS as supported OS