lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Peculiar institution

message: "It was in popular use during the first half of the 19th century, especially in legislative bodies, as the word slavery was deemed "improper," and was actually banned in certain areas."
If the word "slavery" was banned, wouldn't that come into conflict with the first amendment? Could someone expand upon this? CA387 22:53, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Usage

message: Removed the phrase "perception, as they see it" referring to abortion, as it is redundant. Eran of Arcadia 14:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal
Talk:Event (particle physics)

message: I think of an "event" as one interaction, not one spill of data (one bunch crossing). The article implies that each bunch crossing at LHC will be one event, with many interactions. I would have thought that each bunch crossing at LHC contains many events. Thoughts? Josh Thompson 05:07, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  definition of Event 

message: Would it be correct to say that all known events can be classified to collisions (including elastic and inelastic ones) and decays? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collision, decay, … what else? 

message: :"Physical quantities used to analyze events include the differential cross section, the flux of the beams (which in turn depends on the number density of the particles in the beam and their average velocity), and the rate and luminosity of the experiment."
For a start, you don't use any of these quantities to analyse a single event. Flux and luminosity are highly correlated, so why mention both? Cross sections are calculated from rates and luminosities, which are in turn measured from counting events. But first you need to do something (i.e. analyse) the events in order to know which ones to count.
Quantities used to analyse events are things like transverse momentum, invariant mass, helicity angles, flight distance, etc. 
Dukwon (talk) 22:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious
Talk:Exotic hadron

message: The first phrase:
"Exotic hadrons are subatomic particles made of quarks (and possibly gluons)" 
is wrong. If there are quarks involved then there are also gluons involved, since quarks are confined by the strong force, mediated by gluons.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.175.12.86 (talk) 14:39, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I know I'm responding to an old comment, but a hadron with valence gluon content will be exotic. e.g. glueball as an extreme example Dukwon (talk) 22:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Per the LHC's recent discovery. Acather96 (click here to contact me) 13:17, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs updating
Talk:Brad Steiger

message: Currently his bibliography is a separate article, Brad Steiger bibliography. This page isn't long enough to need the bibliography to be broken out, and the bibliography could do with being edited (maybe restricted to books). Therefore, I propose that it be merged to Brad Steiger, this article. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:27, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The bibliography certainly looks like it could use some work, perhaps separating it into sections, such as books, articles, etc.  The format also isn't easy on the eyes.  I wouldn't consider merely copying and pasting it into the Brad Steiger article. — QuicksilverT @ 03:05, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge bibliography 

message: What is the connection between the author's birth name of "Eugene E. Olsen" and his current name, "Brad Steiger"?  Is the latter a pen name, or is it a legal name change?  When children are adopted they usually keep their given names and assume the surname of their adoptive parents, but in this case there is no obvious relationship between the given names and surnames.  What were the circumstances of him adopting the name "Brad Steiger"?  Readers of the article may want to know. — QuicksilverT @ 03:05, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subject's name 

message: What is appropriate manner to cite this date or reference in this wikipedia entry?
Perhaps a parenthetical note on this line:
Steiger was married to Sherry Hansen Steiger, an author and minister, from 1987 to his death in 2018. They have five children and nine grandchildren.[2] He died on May 6, 2018 at the age of 82.
Or on this line:
SpouseSherry Hansen Steiger (m. 1987)
Or maybe it cannot be cited here?
A line like:
(His spouse died March 7, 2020 at the age of 75.)
During the following Coast to Coast episode George Noory mentions that Brad Steiger's spouse died in 2020.
URL:
https://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2020-11-26-show/
Title: UFO Round-Up
First Half Guest: Retired Army Lieutenant Colonel Kevin Randle 
Discussion of Project Blue Book
This website contains more info:
Sherry Lorraine Steiger
April 24, 1945 - March 7, 2020
URL:
https://www.majorericksonfuneralhome.com/obituaries/Sherry--Lorraine-Steiger?obId=12382786  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.37.20.83 (talk) 11:29, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spouse Sherry Lorraine Steiger died March 7, 2020 -- how to cite?
Talk:Chase Vault

message: Dear god...--Threedots dead (talk) 13:39, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Christ Church Parish Church in Oistins, Christ Church, Barbados."

message: There is a written account from 1824, found in the Barbados National Archives, just four years after the vault was opened for the last time, by the Hon. Nathan Lucas, an eye witness to the final opening.  The Governor, a highly decorated war hero, and the Rector of Christ Church were present, and the Lucas account was 'certified" as correct by the Rector, Thomas Orderson, Doctor of Divinity.  Also, it is incorrect to say that burial records do not exist; records for all six individuals interred in the crypt between 1813 and 1820 do exist, with the correct dates, and these can easily be pulled up on ancestry.com.  Given the unlikelihood that the Governor of the Island and the Rector of Christ Church had any reason to fabricate such a story, and moreover that the vault was emptied of six coffins that had to be buried elsewhere in the cemetery, the crux of the matter falls in favor of how it happened (because something apparently did happen) rather than if it happened. 69.73.193.11 (talk) 00:51, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Cite a reliable source. Orderson, as described in this article, has been thoroughly discredited as a reliable source of info, therefore anything "certified as correct" by him is immediately suspect. The article does not say that there are no interment records for the dates in question, it quite clearly says that these records do not corroborate Orderson's accounts. In other words, there are no records to substantiate that "something apparently did happen" before the first publication of one of Orderson's tales in 1833, eleven years after the first alleged occurrence of the phenomena. If something "apparently did happen", why did it take over a decade for it to appear in print?  12.233.147.42 (talk) 20:19, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lang's Lacking Evidence  

message: Is it possible there is a strong magnetic energy at the vault that makes the lead coffins tumbling around, while Mrs. Goddard's wooden coffin was remain undisturbed?
Perhaps it was formed only occasionally at certain moments. Lead is not magnetic, but very strong magnets energy can make it move. Uriel welsh (talk) 14:06, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It’s unlikely. In any case, your questions are better asked at WP:RD/S. - LuckyLouie (talk) 17:56, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Lead Coffin and a Strong Magnetic Energy
Talk:Gaugino

message: The Standard Model photon is a mixture of the B field of weak hypercharge and the third W field of weak isospin. A "photino" would therefore be a mixture of the corresponding gauginos (the Bino and the third Wino). If such a mixture would exist as a physical state (as in the case of the photon) probably depends on the exact SUSY model. The same applies to the "Zino", the superpartner of the Z boson. 
178.200.137.235 (talk) 18:18, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

message: I've not studied particle or theoretical physics since my BSc days, however wasn't existence of the photino eliminated by the discovery of the Casimir effect?  
109.150.151.115 (talk) 00:56, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casimir effect?
Talk:Generation (particle physics)

message: I removed this entire section because it isn't really relevant to the topic of Generations. It was mostly a musing from Feynman about whether quarks and leptons were fundamental, and not related to Generations. I took a couple of sentences from this section and added them onto a different section, but for the most part I removed the "Fundamentality" section. FFLaguna (talk) 01:32, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fundamentality of second- and third-generation leptons

message: The charges of the up-type quarks are +2e/3 and of the down-type ones is -e/3. And also, it exists the quantum numbers: charm, strangeness, topness and bottomness. Paranoidhuman (talk) 02:12, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: These quantum numbers only express the fact that there is no interaction which transforms p.e. a charm into a bottom, so these are conserved. The difference in charge is between the two quarks in the same generation, not between the generations. If the quarks had same masses, all the up-type quarks could be seen as different states of the same particle and the same for the down-type ones. 129.70.165.248 (talk) 11:21, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Between generations, particles differ only by their mass???

message: I'm updating the fourth generation wording.  The statement that the fourth generation is "ruled out by theoretical considerations" is lacking a reference, and is out of date.  See for example: http://arxiv.org/abs/0706.3718  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.229.136 (talk) 07:05, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Fourth Generation

message: The value is supposed to be 1777MeV/c2, but the template makes it look like it's three orders of magnitude smaller. I don't know how to correct this.--90.179.235.249 (talk) 02:26, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  formating problem 

message: Is there a better way to phrase this? The link to matter even says it is not well defined. My suggestion of "stable atoms" was reverted and I can see that this also has problems. Bhny (talk) 20:13, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  everyday matter is a bit vague
Talk:Al-Tahawi

message: I would appreciate if someone could smooth out Footnote #3. Thanks There are 10 kinds of people: those who understand binary and those who don't. (talk) 06:26, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Help

message: I merged Tahawi into this, since this was a larger the larger article --Striver 01:20, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He is not known for his full name. He is known as Tahawi‎. --Islamic 05:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Tahawi redirects here. I will clarify it in the article. --Striver 16:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: To avoid sectarian squabbling, we should leave his creed as "the Creed of Abu Hanifa", as he wrote his own creed and he states in it that it is of the methodology of Abu Hanifa and his students. 
Please do not revert this to e.g. "Athari" or "Ashari/Maturidi". ParthikS8 (talk) 23:01, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  His Creed 

message: Do not insist on your opinion, if you have reliable sources to support your view, then bring them in; otherwise you have no leg to stand on! See also: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view & Wikipedia:No original research.--TheEagle107 (talk) 01:30, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute resolution
Talk:Gustav Adolf Scheel

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=cTGhLruuq6IC&lpg=PP1&ots=j4bgdIz9MM&dq=Wisser%20ehrlich&pg=PA334#v=onepage&q&f=false  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grshiplett (talk • contribs) 16:10, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing reference to Wisser and Ehrlich on Karl Jaspers and Scheel
Talk:Sistrurus miliarius barbouri

message: Please note: I created this redirect so that links could at least be (re)directed to the parent article, Sistrurus miliarius. I encourage any editor willing, in the future, to create an article on this page specifically for this subspecies of snake. In the mean time, at least readers will get an article concerning the species. --Iamunknown 21:20, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concerning the redirect
Talk:Gustav Radbruch

message: * The case of Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany(Applications nos. 34044/96, 35532/97 and 44801/98) before ECHR should be incorporated in the article. --Accursius (talk) 14:46, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ECHR 
Talk:Gustav Ritter von Kahr

message: 3rd and 4th paragraph sound like they have been written by a  volkischer beobachter editor
It needs a major overhaul or maybe a second source Georgefotiou (talk) 10:39, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insane POV  

message: A fantasy, according to a highly trustworthy source (German Wikipedia, German Wikipedia).
2A02:AA1:1615:855F:BD2B:1546:C141:B7F9 (talk) 15:46, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hacked to death with axes
Talk:Pavise

message: Err, actually, a Pavise is a Pavise and not a mantlet. A mantlet is a large, door like object roughly the height of a man without a central ridge, 2 different things.
What would a pavise be made of?  What would the handle(s) be like?  Can we see one from behind?  How heavy would they be?  What did they descend from?  What followed them?  Where were they made?
IceDragon64 22:42, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 12:34, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Talk:Gustave Niebaum

message: There is nothing about Niebaum in that section at all. Sticking his name in there won't help. The entire section needs to be moved into a history of San Francisco, or else deleted. TooManyFingers (talk) 04:24, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Little Scandinavia" section doesn't belong here
Talk:HERA (particle accelerator)

message: Would be great if there was a summary of some of the results obtained from the experiments at HERA.--345Kai (talk) 07:38, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Results? 

message: I would suggest moving this page to its English-language title.  The title as it is now (with spaces) is Denglish (neither English nor German).  The acronym "HERA" is also the same in both English and German.  Nicole Sharp (talk) 09:57, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  English title 

message: * CLAS
* LEPS
Reference to HERMES removed as it is included in the new section about detectors. SVD link did not exit. --Redactrice at DESY (talk) 09:26, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also 

message: * HERA website at DESY
 
 
:Category:Buildings and structures in Altona, Hamburg
:Category:Education in Hamburg
:Category:Particle physics facilities
Redactrice at DESY (talk) 09:23, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you review the article now?  I have retained the diagrams (not included in your suggestion).  —Quondum 18:17, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @QuondumLooks very good, thank you! Redactrice at DESY (talk) 09:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:   —Quondum 12:39, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:Helicity (particle physics)

message: Helicity is something else from handedness, look it up, for example in Perkins, and fix it. I have no time now, but this is wrong imho.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.121.85.171 (talk) 11:15, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Helicity is related to handedness. I refer you to Krane - introduction to nuclear physics. I can't remember the page number - look it up in the index. Georgeryall (talk) 00:26, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Helicity is a measure of handedness in the direction of propogation 86.136.222.154 (talk) 19:24, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that's right. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 19:40, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Handedness vs. Helicity

message: This article needs improvement. I didn't understand the lead or the introduction, and I graduated from college with a physics major. Projection of spin onto momentum? Spin is a QM phenomenon, so I don't see how it "projects" onto other properties, such as position or momentum or energy. Can a diagram be added to show what it means? I know what a helix is: circular curve or motion that is stretched out along its axis. But is this article talking about angular momentum stretched out along its axis? Or is it talking about EM waves perhaps? I can't tell exactly what the subject matter is without a clear explanation and perhaps a diagram or two. David Spector (talk) 22:49, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is helicity?
Talk:Gustavo Díaz Ordaz

message: The first infobox lacks his term date of ambassadorship in Spain. Aminabzz (talk) 22:28, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambassador
Talk:Commandos Marine

message: I love when I read articles about "tough" guys and how they talk about the lack of sleep they have. Unless you are one of the few genetically predisposed individuals who actually need only 4 or less hours of sleep a night, having only 2hrs of sleep for over three months (14 wks) in a highly physical environment is impossible to sustain. You would collapse. Your body would also not be able to repair the damage done to it throughout training. Add to that the fact that they are making things also intellectually challenging and it becomes absurd. The only people who might be able to pass that are simply people who are genetically predisposed to having reduced sleep cycles. It has nothing to do about "toughness" or character.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.187.238.14 (talk) 10:39, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two hours of sleep 

message: There is an ongoing discussion at the disambiguation page for  Green Berets which is relevant to this page. The gist of the discussion is whether the name Green Berets refers exclusively to the US Army Special Forces, or if it is also widely identified with other special forces groups, such as this one. If you have something to add, please come and join in. GyroMagician (talk) 09:51, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Green Berets

message: I propose to merge French commando frogmen into Commandos Marine as it is redundant. · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 11:10, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Support per nominator. French commando frogmen is a subset of Commandos Marine and can readily be discussed within that page. Klbrain (talk) 10:01, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

text: Klbrain (talk) 12:01, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Smoking (rolling paper)

message: The charges are completely BOGUS.  We've been selling Smoking brand in the USA for many years and are the USA Importer of such.  How can MCM be charged with a criminal offense when basically every other company is also making papers with wood in them?   It's ridiculous and we stand by MCM in this!   --Joshmann 21:29, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am new to this, but what I've seen as a general rule in Wikipedia is a generally fair and unbiased treatment of subjects. Saying that Smoking Master are too hard to roll without ripping is no kind of concensus that I've been exposed to. As a regular roller, though I don't generally roll with Smoking Master, quite a number of my friends do and I've never once been witness to or have heard of this problem. Also, for all that I read in the Wikipedia introduction that no personal attacks will be tolerated, what's this "don't bend over" slag about? Mr Tobacco, I don't know what you've got against Smoking, but you certainly seem to be showing your own BIAS. Funk'd 02:32, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I thought Wikipedia was about neutrality? 

message: I am cutting this out of the article. Not sure what do with it, but if it is just a translation, then it may still violate WP:COPYVIO. -- ǝʌlǝʍʇ ǝuo-ʎʇuǝʍʇ ssnɔsıp 19:30, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation
Talk:Guy Bertrand (lawyer)

message: So then what does he do:
"The flamboyant lawyer is releasing a new book titled "Guide d'acces a l'independance; pour la survie du Quebec francais" (roughly translated as "Guide to independence: for the survival of French Quebec").
Bertrand said Marois' strategy doesn't make sense because French is threatened with being dethroned as Montreal's main language by English in the next 10 years." 
Let's see: percentage of Montreal population franco 70% anglo 20% allo 10%.  Some threat.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Toddsschneider (talk • contribs) 17:45, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "he criticizes the destructive and dishonest tactics of the Quebec separatist movement"
Talk:Waldorf salad

message: Three theories of the salad's invention, one of which (invented in the early 20th C) contradicts two others (which mention 1896.) Any light to shed on this, anyone? Nach0king 21:33, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: Why is this in the US format of cups etc. What is a cup? A demi tasse or a mug? Are we allowed to convert this this the universally understood metric system? 86.133.237.35 11:51, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A cup is 250ml  —Preceding unsigned comment added by XM8 Carbine (talk • contribs) 11:54, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No it isn't.  It's about 237ml.  I wouldn't have bothered to mention it except for the fact that it is a significant difference IMO. By extrapolation, a pint (2 cups) of beer is noticeably less to the beer drinker than a half-literPithecanthropus4152 (talk) 03:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recipe 

message: Removed with this edit . Noting here for posterity I suppose. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:53, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: In popular culture section

message: There are recipes using the celery root or celery stems. The current article is not clear on what the original recipe declares or on the discrepancies of the ingredients. Could someone improve on the article? Theking2 (talk) 16:36, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Celery 

message: The picture at the top purporting to be a Waldorf Salad is merely some insane, overpaid chef's abstract design and is obviously not meant for eating, only looking at. I've been eating and making Waldorf for 50+ years. This ain't it. PLEASE -- someone find a good non-copyrighted photo to replace this monstrosity! --Michael K SmithTalk  21:20, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustration
Talk:State observer

message: "The usual state space model for a (plant) system can be written as..." — What on earth is a "(plant) system"? This article needs either context (to explain its arcane terminology) or cleanup (to replace the arcana with clearer language). --Quuxplusone 21:36, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Context

message: The recently added section (by an anonymous IP) on the "nonlinear case" seems superfluous. Already there is a sentence discussing that a sliding mode observer can be used, and on the sliding mode control page, the design of a sliding mode observer is already included, and that design is nearly identical to the added mess. Does all of that need to be included here? (without any reference to its sliding mode roots?) —TedPavlic (talk/contrib/@) 13:09, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone through and cleaned up the new section a bit. I'm not familiar with the references given, but it appears like there were some mistakes in the content given in the new section. I've done my best to correct them, but I have to imagine the primary sources present the material in a more elegant way. Someone should feel free to clean up the content a bit more. —TedPavlic (talk/contrib/@) 15:22, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonlinear case is duplicated content 
Talk:Guy Sorman

message: This man is a massive charlatan, who comprehends his chosen topics in a rudimentary sense at best. --06:43, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: care to expand on this?--XOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO (talk) 20:18, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barf. 