Talk:Mimi wo Sumaseba

message: I had thought that the claim that Miyazaki diected the fantasy sequence was a rumour, where is there documentation for that claim?Finite 20:35, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fantasy Sequences

message: Someone had recently inserted into this article some  infobox templates, which pretty much messed up the format/look of this article.  Though I agree that that information is pertinent to this article, I don't believe it belongs here.  More likely, a new article is required as this article focuses primarily on the movie from Studio Ghibli.  If there are no objections to this, I will create a new article, and move the infoboxes there.  (I won't really be adding to the page's content though since I don't know anything about the manga, etc.  I've only seen the movie.)  If the creation of a new article happens, I hope that the users will be able to contribute to it.  Thanks.  --Miss Ethereal 17:14, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it needs to be in another article to, but I as well have only seen the movie and do not know much about the comic. So I guess it could be moved to another article and see if anyone takes it up from there. --Alus 06:49, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have split all film content to a new article - Whisper of the Heart (film). kollision (talk) 08:00, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New article maybe?

message: Whisper of the Heart	Whisper of the Heart
Whisper of the Heart	Whisper of the Heart
 is an anime feature film produced by Studio Ghibli
: Yeah, do you know how to fix it so the Contents box isn't pushed all the way to the bottom? And how to get rid of the "|- |- |- |- |- |}" on the top of the page? I tried looking for it, but didn't see it anywhere in the markup page...  Applejaxs 14:39, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It has already been fixed, was an assumed vandalism at first. Now that I read your message it seems to have been a mistake Rgoodermote 18:09, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  (trying to figure out infobox problem) 

message: I have my doubts about the translation of the song... Where does the "la la la la" come from? If we want a translation, we need it thoroughly checked.
I also think that it starts to clutter the article, so it might be better if the translation of the song is split of to a separate article. Shinobu 13:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song translation 

message: The lyrics of "Country Road" are written on this page in roma-ji, but I believe the lyrics are copyrighted by its creators and don't belong here. I'll be bold and delete the whole section. If you have any comments on this, let me know. --朝彦 (Asahiko) 15:32, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aren't song lyrics copyrighted? 

message: No kidding "|- |- |- |- |- |}" is in the article, but it is a pain to find, it is no where in the history and when you edit it is not there...I have checked if I was cached and I have not been looking at cached version..can some one help me in finding out how it is occurring Rgoodermote 18:55, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've found where it shows up but I don't know how to fix it. It shows up here: []. Compare it with the previous edit and you'll see it shows up after the infobox animanga was added.. Applejaxs 19:19, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well now we know where the problem is and how it got there, now how to get rid of it...I wonder if there is a barnstar for most frustrating vandal edit? Rgoodermote 21:37, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I fixed it... someone had moved the various infobox templates ever so slightly, and it created the problem. Sneaky... --Kyoko 21:59, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I have been here looking at the code for a while and didn't even notice it. Hm vandalism is starting to get smarter, could be a problem in the future. Rgoodermote 22:29, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah...imagine needing to do this for EVERY vandalism problem.....Crazy. But at least this page is fixed now! Applejaxs 23:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be said that this might not have been vandalism at all, but rather the result of someone who was unfamiliar with adding multiple infoboxes to an article. --Kyoko 16:19, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

text: That could be and when I look at the IP that did the mistake..it has no prior warnings. I think I was wrong in assuming it was vandalism. Rgoodermote 22:18, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  vandalism, and I can't find how it was done