Talk:What's New Pussycat?

message: Can a fellow Wikipedian please assist in editing the title?  The is no comma after the word "New".  Title should be as follows: What's New Pussycat? Can someone delete the comma? Penny Lane 01:17, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to IMDB there is a comma. --Arcadian 03:08, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The proper authority for this should be the film itself. In the introductory credits, the film's name is "What's New Pussycat". At the end, the credit for the theme-tune is also given as "What's New Pussycat". In both cases with the apostrophe but no comma. Therefore I deduce that the film's proper title is "What's New Pussycat", with an apostrophe but no comma. I will edit the main page.Peter Maggs 18:11, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

text: OK, I've renamed the page and hope I have not screwed anything up! Peter Maggs 18:23, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Rechecking the film, I realise of course, that I left out the issue of the question mark. The question mark does not appear on the title in the film, although it is included on the DVD cover as well as the title of this entry. I'm not sure that it is necessary to change the name of the entry again, but perhaps fellow Wikipedians have their thoughts? Peter Maggs 05:28, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing title 

message: Is it Renee or Renée ? Hektor 17:15, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Having checked with my wife (a French teacher), it is, of course, Renée. Well spotted Hektor. I've made the change. Peter Maggs 20:34, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Renee Lefebvre 

message: Shouldn't we mention the sequel ?  -- Beardo 01:19, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sequel 

message: The Internet Movie Database incorrectly states that "What's New Pussycat" was banned in Norway. The same incorrect information has already appeared, twice actually, in the present article. We should go for the facts, and so I have removed the passage in question. On the following link you will find a complete list of movies once banned in Norway: http://film.medietilsynet.no/Filmdatabase/Soek?tittel=®i=&roller=&genre=&aldersgrense%3Alist=Forbudt&land=&aar=&vurdert=&distributoer=&datoStart=&bildeformat=&datoSlutt=
Note the absence of What's New Pussycat. Generalstaben 17:35, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banned? 

message: An anonymous comment on the talk page of I'll Never Forget What's 'Isname claims that What's New, Pussycat preceded I'll Never Forget What's 'Isname in using the word fuck. Can anybody confirm this? TheMadBaron 04:48, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First use of the word ''fuck'' in a screenplay 

message: :Image:Whats new pussycat.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Whats new pussycat.jpg

message: The content on the right side seems to be screwing up the layout. Proxy User (talk) 22:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Layout 

message: As of the present, the DVD section say something about a "Region 1" Blu-Ray release. This is obviously wrong as the Blu-Ray regions are A (presumably the one meant), B and C. Also, as written, the section implies that the DVD and Blu-Ray releases were only in regions 1 and A respectively, which I suspect is also wrong. Someone needs to edit this section. — 2A02:C7D:462:1500:8D27:89E7:BBAE:3315 (talk) 19:26, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: "DVD" section -- errors and omissions?