Talk:Matricaria chamomilla

message: I went ahead and changed the picture in the info box.  In the gallery was a picture that is not only featured on Wikipedia and Wikimedia commons, but was picture of the day in no less than two languages and Wikimedia Commons, and is even the picture in the template for all of WikiProject plants and the stub template for its family, but for some reason, was not even the info box picture for its own article.
I fixed that, and it looks much better, in my opinion.
--The Human Spellchecker (talk) 05:58, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info box picture 

message: Should the name be capitalized as "German Chamomile", or should the 'c' be lower-case? - Brian Kendig 06:22, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See the guidelines of WP:TOL and its talk page.  JoJan 07:57, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Let me clarify my question. Is there a reason why the name of this article, and the name as given in the article itself, is capitalized as "German Chamomile"? Is "German Chamomile" a proper noun for some reason? I'm just making sure before I change "chamomile" to lower case. - Brian Kendig 13:14, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been discussed over and over in the last few years; see discussions in the archives of Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life. It has been agreed upon to keep common names capitalized for plants. However newcomers sometimes tend not to follow this rule as they are unaware of past discussions. Therefore I would recommend to keep the name capitalized.  JoJan 14:52, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization 

message: Could someone maybe research what in chamomile causes the sleepiness/stomach relief?
-Metakraid 01:48, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information? 

message: This article needs moved to its scientific name, Matricaria recutita, the policy for plant articles on Wikipedia.  However, it's impossible to follow what is going on, and with the scientific name already an improper redirect to its common name this requires administrative action.  --Blechnic (talk) 06:34, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: Technically this is a non-controversial move, but with all the admins and all the reversions of CarolSpears' attempt to create this article under its scientific name, it probably has to go this way.  WP:Plants policy is that plants go under scientific names.  There's no reason for this to be an exception unless this article is entirely about its non-plant, in which case, Carol was right to create one under the other name, and the copyvio material should have been removed, and at least the taxobox retained.  When I post a copyvio notice, I try to create a stub that can be used to create the article--it's simple and the instructions are on the copyvio page, and in the notice posted on the page with the tag.  --Blechnic (talk) 07:03, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Anyone know why it is called Blue Chamomile, when it doesn't appear to be blue from the pictures or description.--Ericjs (talk) 06:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blue? 

message: The Etymology section states "Common names include ... pineapple weed (referring to the shape of the inflorescences) ...". Is this true? My UK reference books say Pineapple Weed is the common name for Chamomila suaveolens (synonym Matricaria matricarioides), which, unlike M.chamomilla, does have flowers which could fancifully be likened to miniature pineapples and also has a pineapple scent. Is M.chamomilla known as Pineapple Weed elsewhere in the anglophone world? I will remove the name from the article unless someone objects.Newburyjohn (talk) 13:17, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Pineapple Weed" ? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Matricaria chamomilla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081012214100/http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/crops/hort/herbs/chamom.htm to http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/crops/hort/herbs/chamom.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061008095300/http://altmed.creighton.edu/preg/chamomile.htm to http://altmed.creighton.edu/preg/chamomile.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120907024040/http://www.thorne.com/altmedrev/.fulltext/13/1/58.pdf to http://www.thorne.com/altmedrev/.fulltext/13/1/58.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:29, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: It makes some pretty grand claims for chamomile. This struck me as a bit odd since scientists don't usually rave about common herbs and call them "stars." So I followed the link.
Well, it's apparently not scientists who call it a "star." So I flagged that part.
As for the rest, the source just doesn't seem...scientific? It seems like more of a cultural and historical survey of the plant. Such pieces often appear in peer-reviewed journals but shouldn't be mistaken for double blind studies, which are needed to verify medicinal claims. 2603:7081:1603:A300:2CD3:518:C971:6DB3 (talk) 14:34, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It has no medicinal effects supported by WP:MEDRS sources, as revised with this edit. The correct perspective of insufficient medical research is given in the NIH brief review. Zefr (talk) 15:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern Research section seems questionable