Template talk:Infobox RPG

message: proposed by Angelbo, moved here by Percy Snoodle
                	
<Br>            	<Br>
Date of release:	
Publisher       	
Chief designer  	
System          	
Genre           	
:I like your table format - how about this: I've corrected some typos, and added the footnotes section (it's sometimes useful) and also changed "release date" (a CVG way of putting things) to "publication date" Percy Snoodle 14:53, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact, I like your table layout so much I've put it in. Percy Snoodle 15:13, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks it is just base on the game infobox however I did not change the colour on it, so mached the rest of the RPG infoboxes. Thanks for the good work and great Ideas, keep em coming. Angelbo 17:03, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Extra Note Perhaps there should be a notice at the bottom of the infobox with a small font and the caption: "This infobox is maintained by WP:RPG Angelbo 17:18, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea.  I've added a notice in the noinclude section, but another one in the infobox sounds like a good plan. Percy Snoodle 09:50, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative layout

message: Moved to WikiProject RPGs/Goals. Jonas Karlsson 22:14, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Measurable as short-term goal

message: Would it be useful to add optional lines for supplements, like the role-playing game(s) it is used for? That way, we could add infoboxes to a articles about sourcebooks and supplements, too.
:No, it was decided that either a sourcebook and supplement is notable enough for its own page, or not worth putting into the infobox. Percy Snoodle 11:44, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supplements 

message: The WikiProject notice was removed on 2nd April by User:Paxomen, with the motivation that it's useful to editors and not readers. I want it back, as I think it's good to make people notice the project and maybe become editors if they're not already. I'll wait a couple of days and then put it back if no one objects. Jonas Karlsson 14:46, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Or not. I think I'll just add the RPGproject note to the articles' talk page instead. Jonas Karlsson 11:06, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject text

message: I would suggest adding an optional 'conversions' field, for RPG systems that started out in one system, but have been officially converted into several others. This would include such notable games as Deadlands (which has been converted officially into d20, GURPS, White Wolf's Storyteller, and Savage Worlds), and Traveller (GURPS and d20) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Primalchaos (talk • contribs) 01:38, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Such games should have muliple entries listed using the  parameter. Percy Snoodle 07:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conversions field? 

message: In my quest to make infoboxen look consistent and pretty I'm planning on re-working this one. The most important change is that unknown attributes won't be shown at all: they won't have "unknown" in them. This is consistent with other infoboxes. Is this acceptable? Chris Cunningham 13:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I've just gone ahead and done this. Chris Cunningham 13:34, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganisation