Talk:Hitler's War

message: The article says the book is controversial, but doesn't say why. A summary of the controversy for those of us unfamiliar with it would be helpful. --Delirium 05:51, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Just saying it's controversial is WP:Peacock wording.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 18:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's actually completely untrue, and you're clearly no scholar of the period. There's myriad evidence of Hitler's involvement. There's the Hossbach Memorandum of 1937, and his January 1939 speech which he later backdated to September 1, 1939, there's also his correspondence with Himmler, who tasked Heydrich with organizing the "Final Solution," and then there's the documents generated at the Wannsee Conference. There's also the statements made to Albert Speer and Traudl Junge in the Führerbunker, both of whom document his feeling that "at least he can be proud of ridding Germany of the Jews."  I suspect you have a rather antisemetic axe to grind, for your erroneous opinion flies in the face of academic consensus.Yezterdae (talk) 19:18, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

text: Attitudes changed between the 1950s and 1970s. There is much more interest in the Holocaust nowadays. Drutt (talk) 14:19, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the "Reactions and criticism" section, it's mostly quoting historians about the Holocaust and not about the larger operations of the war. The 2002 edition is not flattering about Hitler - he is described as the gambler that he was - and there are mistakes such as Irving's complete misunderstanding of Franco's change of position to Non-belligerent in mid-war. In the background, academic historians always dislike the amateur who produces a best-seller, but that's human nature.86.42.217.68 (talk) 16:17, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy

message: No, the first edition of Hitler's War in 1977 does not deny the Holocaust (through Irving in fact has denied the Holocaust, but that came later in the 1980s-1990s). The first edition of Hitler's War says that the Holocaust took place, but that Hitler did not know about it, at least not until 1943. The second edition, which was published in 1991, again does not deny the Holocaust, but plays down the genocide of the Jews in a number of small ways. For example, the second edition refuses to refer to death camps as death camps (which the first edition did). In a more general sense, Hitler's War is a controversial book because not only the book describe World War Two from the vanpoint of Hitler, but also goes to considerable lenghts to present Hitler in the best possible light.--A.S. Brown (talk) 06:25, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's actually completely untrue, and you're clearly no scholar of the period. There's myriad evidence of Hitler's involvement. There's the Hossbach Memorandum of 1937, and his January 1939 speech which he later backdated to September 1, 1939, there's also his correspondence with Himmler, who tasked Heydrich with organizing the "Final Solution," and then there's the documents generated at the Wannsee Conference. There's also the statements made to Albert Speer and Traudl Junge in the Führerbunker, both of whom document his feeling that "at least he can be proud of ridding Germany of the Jews."  I suspect you have a rather antisemetic axe to grind, for your erroneous opinion flies in the face of academic consensus.Yezterdae (talk) 19:18, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

text: Attitudes changed between the 1950s and 1970s. There is much more interest in the Holocaust nowadays. Drutt (talk) 14:19, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the "Reactions and criticism" section, it's mostly quoting historians about the Holocaust and not about the larger operations of the war. The 2002 edition is not flattering about Hitler - he is described as the gambler that he was - and there are mistakes such as Irving's complete misunderstanding of Franco's change of position to Non-belligerent in mid-war. In the background, academic historians always dislike the amateur who produces a best-seller, but that's human nature.86.42.217.68 (talk) 16:17, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Why the controversy over ''Hitler's War''

message: Much of the information in the David Irving article relates directly to the book Hitler's War that he wrote. This  material might deserve to be included in this entry instead of being crowded in a biographical page about the writer-historian Irving. ADM (talk) 02:41, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: David Irving article

message: I understand a TV documentary series was produced based on this book? I think it was sometime in the 1990s. Drutt (talk) 08:51, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: 1991 Castle Communications. More info here. I clearly remember Irving getting a name credit. Drutt (talk) 14:43, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV Series 

message: The hyperlinked "Craig 1982" reference leads to nowhere. Perhaps who ever added the Craig reference could fix it.--Britannicus (talk) 20:26, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken reference

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hitler's War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081225104823/http://www.adl.org/Holocaust/irving.asp to http://www.adl.org/Holocaust/irving.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:11, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified