Talk:Creation Research Society

message: Trying to nip this before it gets crazy: Let's gather up sources on this and see what they say exactly.  Nothing is resolved by replacing one unsourced claim with a new unsourced claim.  Professor marginalia (talk) 18:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Schisms

message: This addition lacked reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy, as required by WP:SOURCES. If it's "Notable Research" then it should have been noted by a reliable third party in a source we can use, not just published by the CRS. So, I've removed the list until a suitably published third party evaluation is provided. . . dave souza, talk 11:38, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *Speaking of self-citation, the journal article in question, according to Google Scholar, is only ever cited by its own author (RA Herrmann) -- who does so nine times. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 14:23, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: So, a reference in another refereed journal isn't good enough and the articles in CRSQ aren't allowed. Do you punish all that have anything to do with the society and give awards to those who have no affiliation next? Dan Watts (talk) 14:25, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No it is not, particularly not when it is a self-citation. Most institutions have articles published by their employees cited on a daily basis -- it is the sort of trivial & "indiscriminate" WP:IINFO that Wikipedia is meant to avoid. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 14:54, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-notable Research

message: [Removed from User talk:Hrafn ]
If cites are all that are missing, I can (and would) supply all their article links. Perhaps that is not what you meant by "uncited." What DID you mean? Dan Watts (talk) 03:12, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  CRS revert 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Creation Research Society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927021651/http://www.creationresearch.org/belief_wndw.htm to http://www.creationresearch.org/belief_wndw.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927021547/http://www.creationresearch.org/hisaims.htm to http://www.creationresearch.org/hisaims.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131020034012/http://www.creationresearch.org/vacrc/vacrc.html to http://www.creationresearch.org/vacrc/vacrc.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140403190349/http://www.creationresearch.org/past_boards.html to http://www.creationresearch.org/past_boards.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:05, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Creation Research Society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20070621033807/http://www.hup.harvard.edu/pdf/NUMCRX_excerpt.pdf to http://www.hup.harvard.edu/pdf/NUMCRX_excerpt.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified