lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Atlantic and Great Western Railroad

message: When the gauge was changed from 1829 mm to standard gauge of 1435 mm?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.113.114.94 (talk) 08:40, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gauge change of Atlantic & Great Western Railroad

message: From first paragraph:
"The owners of the three railroads had been working closely together since an October 8, 1852 meeting in Cleveland to plan an expansion of the "Great Broad Route", the Erie Railroad, through their respective areas."
Text from Wikipedia entry "Erie Railroad" History:
"New York and Erie Rail Road: 1832-1861"
"Erie Railway: 1861-1878
In August 1859 the company went into receivership due to the large costs of building, and on June 25, 1861 it was reorganized as the Erie Railway. This was the first bankruptcy of a major trunk line in the U.S."
"New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad: 1878-1895"
Suggested Correction: the phrase "plan an expansion of the "Great Broad Route", the Erie Railroad, through their respective areas" to have removed "the Erie Railroad" because: 
1) The Erie Railroad didn't exist until 1861 under the name "Erie Railway", 
2)the original quote does not contain the phrase "the Erie Railroad" , 
3)the existing railroad that would expand through their respective areas would be the "New York and Erie Rail Road" which existed 1832-1861...at the time of the October 8, 1852 meeting in Cleveland.
Doc Fusion (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 02:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest First Para. Edit 

message: The article on locomotive engineer Samuel Cochrane says that at least part of this railroad was once broad gauge and was converted to standard gauge.  Details, please! --DThomsen8 (talk) 18:21, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broad gauge? 
Talk:French ship Pélican (1702)

message: Were there two ships "Pelican"?   Canadian Etienne Trudeau's son, Maj. Francoise Trudeau, Sr., who in 1702, built old up-river Mobile's (Alabama) first fort. In 1704 he wed, old Mobile, "Pelican Girl" Jeanne Louise Burel. Her "Pelican Girl" sisters; Genivieve Burel wed Canadian Claude Trapagnier, and sister Marguerite Burel wed Gilbert Dardenne. All from Canada to Mobile. All wed 1704. Their father was Canadian Etienne Burel, old Mobile's first inn keeper and escort from France to Mobile, with his Canadian "King's Daughter" (by first marriage to a soldier) wife Marguerite Roussel Burel. Burel had been banished from Canada because he said it's leader was corrupt. A hearing in France, found in his favor, and thus being in charge of the "Pelican Girls" to old Mobile. Actually I think two other ships accompnied the "Pelican" and he was not on the "Pelican", per se. Jim Southport, North Carolina.
:Another point is that this article states the Pelican's career was over in 1697, when she was grounded after the Battle of Hudson Bay, but in Old Mobile Site another Pelican is mentioned in 1704ish, with a link to the pre-move title of this article (1702).  Either there were two ships, or they repaired this ship (and this article is incomplete).  Further research is needed.  --J Clear (talk) 01:14, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Copied the above discussion from French ship Pélican (1693)  --J Clear (talk) 21:01, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Pelicans?
Talk:Fairmile C motor gun boat

message: The infobox has the later boats fitted with 2x2pdr & up to 6 Oerlikons. Is this right? 6 Oerlikons sounds like an awful lot for a boat this size...  Trekphiler (talk) 00:58, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the text I have, yes. Twin .5 Vickers mounts (2 per boat) replaced by single or twin 20mm oerlikon, Holman projector (1 per boat) by a single/twin 20mm. As to how many boats any had the combination for any period of time.....?GraemeLeggett (talk) 12:12, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is interesting. Navyphotos has a gallery of MLs which includes a nice late / postwar shot of an 'A' type that has been rearmed with three single Oerlikons, but this sort of image seems exceptionally rare. Are there any corroborative images of Type 'C' MGBs as re-armed with cannon? 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:5D41:6EDB:9C31:C714 (talk) 15:34, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Type C personality

message: Photo of MGB 061 seems to be an image of Type 'B' ML 145 and not a Type 'C' MGB at all?
There's a 3-pdr Hotchkiss forward, a single Oerlikon aft, no HMG turrets aft of the superstructure (positioned further aft and of slightly different form to Type 'C') and there's a vertical exhaust casing ('funnel'). Not to miss the very obvious deck fittings for mounting extra  DCs and torpedo tubes, along with the distinctive two-thirds-length rubbing strake of this type.
This image: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/4f/3f/9b/4f3f9b5727b0a457a10e92f42f235e47.jpg clearly shows the same boat from a different angle and her true identity is very clear, as her pennant number is visible on her bow. This is a Type 'B', 100%.
It's a nice image, but can we move it to the correct article? 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:5D41:6EDB:9C31:C714 (talk) 15:19, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos
Talk:Crazy 8s (band)/Archive 1

message: Hi, I was summoned here by Jenolen to testify about sources for the original version of this article... or something :) Here's the story - I'm a former student of Valley Catholic School, where one of the former members of The Crazy 8's is currently employed as a band teacher/conductor. One day I was giving him a demonstration/tour of Wikipedia, and, seeing that there was no article about his former band, and knowing that they were notable enough to have one, I asked him if he could rustle up some old newspaper clippings, etc. so we could build an article of some sort. And so it was that during one class period we threw together what would eventually become this article. Since we were sort of in a hurry, we didn't cite everything in a references section, though there are a few references in the text, such as the September 26 1985 issue of Rolling Stone magazine, an undated clipping from TV Guide, etc. Since I left to go to college this fall, though, the photocopies I had of the sources are half a world away at the moment.
So in conclusion, this article was written based on print sources and consultation with a former member of the band (primary resources). I'm afraid I can't help much with this article at this point, but I'm sure Dan Schauffler would be more than happy to help you out - his contact info can be found at the Valley Catholic staff directory under "Fine Arts" (I believe it's against policy to directly post the information on Wikipedia). Good luck! — flamingspinach | (talk) 06:23, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Great! I've contacted him. I hope he can help us. Thanks. --Abu Badali 14:25, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some comments on the original sources
Talk:2015 Pan American Games

message: Need an opinion from other editors. Is the below section biased as an editor claimed when removing it due to perceived bias? Note that I used CBC and Ontario's Auditor General report as sources:
There were critics that claimed the government inflated the budget and Ontario's Auditor General did release a special report in 2016 that stated that the 2009 bid budget was $342 million less that the final budget.
Ninel (talk) 14:18, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not perceive it as biased, but I would suggest a change of "did release" to "released". Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:59, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inflated budget edit delete 
Talk:Glochidium

message: Adding it to the project.
Jourdy288 (talk) 01:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A note

message: Hi, I'm new.
It looks pretty obvious that a word needs changing. Rather than saying "the glochidia do not harm the mussel", the final word should be "fish". 
What's the protocol here? Can I make minor changes such as this, or does it have to be discussed first?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Decca864 (talk • contribs) 17:36, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to edit. (References would be fine.) --Snek01 (talk) 22:05, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Word needs changing 

message: http://www.us.archive.org/GnuBook/?id=freshwaterlandsh00willrich#59 May be a useful image, but not determined to species. --Snek01 (talk) 22:05, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, if you look below the illustration, the snails are indeed indentified to species. Invertzoo (talk) 17:20, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:Keppel's Column

message: This is fully covered at Wentworth Woodhouse, as it should be; Keppels Column should be a redirect, as is the more literate Keppel's Column. Anyone seriously planning to work this gazetteer entry into a genuine encyclopedia article that stands on its own? Or can this be made a redirect? --Wetman (talk) 01:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of former county courts in Wales

message: Polden's book says that there was a county court in Maesteg between 1906 and 1913, but there's nothing to confirm this in the Statutory Instruments either in hard copy or in the London Gazette as far as I can tell.  If anyone knows of another source, then please add Maesteg back. BencherliteTalk 09:29, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Maesteg

message: I have amended the entry on Newbridge County Court to make it clear that there was never a County Court in the village of Newbridge (formerly Monmouthshire, now Caerphilly County Borough). The former Newbridge County Court was renamed as the Pontypridd County Court a few months after it was originally opened (the town itself, and its railway station, was renamed around that time, apparently to avoid confusion with Newbridge (Mon)). As the Pontypridd County Court is still open, I would question whether it is in fact appropriate to include Newbridge County Court here at all, as it is a change of name, not a closure. Ntmr (talk) 18:31, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newbridge/Pontypridd County Court
Talk:Retrocession

message: (moved from my talk to keep it with the article)...
Hi Widefox, is this a case of PTM? Mistakefinder (talk) 08:01, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears to have between two and zero valid entries. A broadconcept may do it, but my suggestion is to merge, and cover these examples at the target, and use a hatnote for the other meaning. Widefox; talk 10:02, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and  Klbrain (talk) 17:36, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  PTM
Talk:Medieval household

message: The footnotes in the table make it look like they apply only to the 'napery'. Is that true or would it be clearer if a 'header row' with a title were added to the table and the footnotes attached to the header?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.15.255.227 (talk) 18:40, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, I had this same concern too. I've tried to fix it, cheers! Lampman (talk) 11:52, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation for the table in the Composition section 

message: I've reverted the latest additions. My concerns included unencyclopaedic language ("it is also the man who is the face of the house, he who holds the purse strings and all that rot"), unsourced additions (e.g. the first para) and the use of sources which are now unreliable (Mary Hayden writing in 1913 is not a reliable source for medieval gender studies in the 21st century - the field has moved on considerably). The editor concerned notes on his user page that he is editing as part of a school project, and that his grades depend on making the edits, which may have influenced the additions. Hchc2009 (talk) 08:23, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion... 

message: Hello. I'm working on the espanish version (i´m mexican) and i found out that there is not an equivalent concept in spanish for household. I wonder if someone here could help me. Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mister Himura (talk • contribs) 03:46, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  I need help about the concept of household. 

message: How is this a good article without a lead section? 93 (talk) 05:45, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing lede
Talk:Workaround

message: Is this used in any fields besides software development? This article appears to be specific to software, but starts off sounding like workaround is a more general term than it is. (unsigned comment)
Personally, I have used it outside of software development, even in daily conversation. --216.165.32.8 (talk) 08:41, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I think the article needs to expanded to include broader meanings. Try Special:WhatLinksHere/Workaround for starters and the use of workarounds to bypass internet censorship should also be mentioned. - Shiftchange (talk) 00:25, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

message: I'm not exactly sure what would be appropriate, but this page has the same image as "kludge", and the two terms are already close in terms of meaning. Does someone have any ideas? LaughingManiac (talk) 12:30, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New image?
Talk:Micropipette

message: This should probably be moved to Pipette
--sergeymk (talk) 01:28, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and will propose merger. Pdcook (talk) 05:18, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

message: Much of the content of this article is covered better in the pipette article. The term micropipette may also mean different things to different people. So I propose we delete this article, move the unique content to the pipette article are redirect. Pdcook (talk) 05:24, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger with pipette
Talk:Mitsubishi 6G7 engine

message: The 6G72 V6 was also available with DOCH MIVEC in the Diamante in asian markets as well as the GTO reaching outputs of 270 hp between 94-97 year models. 
6G73 engines were also fitted with DOCH heads between 94-96 before introducing the economical 24v SOCH heads . As with the range of the 6G7 family block architecture was identical except the bore, Thus making it easy to swap DOCH heads in place of the original SOCH heads. The whole range of the 6G7 family can retrofit a DOCH head from any model. DOCH heads for instance between the 94-97 GTO/3000GT was a DOCH MIVEC head on the 6G72 3 liter, which was also used on the 1994-1997 Montero/1993-1999 Pajero's 6G74 3.5 liter . The SOCH heads are also nearlly to almost identical except for porting finish on specific models. Utilizing the same cam cover gaskets and valve stem seals to cam cover spark plug tube seals.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kongkit (talk • contribs) 09:08, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  6G72 
Talk:Preselection

message: Preselection is a fundamental process in democratic political systems, though it receives far less scrutiny or research than elections and parliamentary activity. I do not think there can be any question of notability, but the creation of the article was intended only as a stub and will need some expanding. I will leave the tag until i have added some more material. hamiltonstone (talk) 01:39, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability etc

message: Does the (unusual?) instance of an existing elected representative being deselected not merit a wee section in this article? --Mais oui! (talk) 16:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deselection
File talk:October 12-13 radarloop kbuf.gif

message: I am not sure who put forth a deletion request, but I was never notified as needed under the terms for deletion. Secondly, the license provided was more than valid as Vaughan Weather.Com has given me exclusive use of its content. Lastly, this data was composed from several gigabytes of raw radar data which is not publicly hosted on the www.vaughanweather.com server, furthermore it is very unlikely most users have the correct software to decode this data, thus a source link to Vaughan Weather will not be provided. Given these conditions the image has been correctly restored and released into the public domain. Theonlysilentbob (talk) 01:42, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Kuwait national football team

message: Mohammed Ibrahem wasn't caretaker in 2004 he was the coach from March until December. --Qadsawi (talk) 14:57, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Sewai

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:52, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Sijhua

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:53, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Sijua

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:53, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Sinduria

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Sini, Jharkhand

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Sirka, India

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Siuliban

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Tati, Ranchi

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:56, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Beija Flor

message: I have edited the article to include more information and to include sources that follow the notability guidelines. The article follows the interests of wikipedia that it is, to my knowledge, pure, unbiased fact, with many cited resources.
Chris
(Chris vankampen (talk) 02:14, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Notability (music)]]
Talk:Tenudam-cum-Kathara

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:56, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Tisra

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:57, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Topchanchi

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:57, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Khalari

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:33, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Kharkhari, Dhanbad

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:32, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Kenduadih

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:32, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Kedla

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:32, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Kandra

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Kalikapur, India

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition