Talk:2006 Formula One World Championship

message: Alex Zanardi will test a BMW Sauber in Spain and he should be credited as a test driver for 2006. Thanks.
:His drive is a prize for his connection to the BMW WTCC team, he's not actually "testing" anything so I don't think he classifies as a true test driver. The359 05:43, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Zanardi

message: Tobacco might be (and possibly will be) banned from Formula One from 2006 onwards.So I am not sure that the title sponsors (Ferrari,Renault,BAR,Midland) will stay that way.
:Ferrari will anyway! Philip Morris have extended their deal to 2011 which F1 Racing estimates will earn Ferrari $1 billion. Tobacco hasn't been banned from F1 anyway. The EU has issued a directive requiring national govs to ban tobacco advertising. Hence the tobacco teams have run with "subliminal" tobacco branding in specific countries. If it was up to the FIA, Ecclestone and most of the teams I suspect tobacco would still be welcome with open arms!
:However BAR (being British based) is subject to more stringent laws and seems to have dropped "Lucky Strike" from its official "long" name.Mark83 23:18, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tobacco 

message: The first Midland F1 car will be called 'M16', in recognition of the disappearing Jordan name's fifteen year GP history. The car designation is a combination of 'M' for Midland, but also acknowledging that it will be the sixteenth formula one design built in the Silverstone factory since Eddie Jordan's team debuted in 1991. The current Jordan is called EJ15.  Andreasu
Constructor is Midland not MF1 - http://www.fia.com/mediacentre/Press_Releases/FIA_Sport/2005/December/011205-01.html. Well then you guys have to change the Constructors name for Red Bull to RBR, SCUDERIA TORO ROSSO to STR. By the way that entry list out dated on FIA site... Also Midland is written all over the rear wing on the new chassis. Even it is stated as Midland for the chassis name not as MF1, MF1 is just short name like it is for RBR. Midland Official Site - http://www.midlandf1.com/main.php?sec=team.cars Andreasu 23:47, 05 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006-spec 'Midland M16' 

message: I was always quite sure that Renault and McLaren were running Michelin tyres for '06. In fact, I never knew any doubt existed. Despite this, under tures is says TBD. If I could be absolutely positive that they were running Michelins, I'd change it, so can someone give me the latest on this--M Johnson 03:30, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculation 

message: In the Teams and drivers table it says that BMW Sauber F1 Team will use Sauber as constructor. Is that really correct? I thought BMW Sauber would construct their own car, now when they have factories both in Hinwil, Switzerland and in Munich, Germany. --Boivie 11:22, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sauber as Constructor 

message: Anyone know why the Team/Driver table is appearing at the bottom of the article? In the editing, it appears in the right place. Also, I think the layout of this artcle needs a bit of clean up. MonkeyMumford 11:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Driver/Team Table 

message: Just to clarify, the Belgian GP, according to the sources available, is not yet cancelled. (22:19, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cancelled. New sources cited, including FIA. -slowpokeiv 23:00, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006 Belgian GP 

message: I believe I heard Martin Brundle say during last weekend's commentary that a race engine had to be used for two races (successive I guess). Did I misinterpret what he said? If I heard correctly, can a Bahrain engine be stripped down this week and be rebuilt for Malaysia?  Moriori 21:33, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what your question is. If you're asking whether engines must be used for two successive races, then, yes they do, same as last year. As for being stripped down, I haven't heard about that - last year the FIA put a tamper-proof seal on them between races so that they couldn't be rebuilt. I don't know if they've changed that for this year. AlbinoMonkey (Talk) 22:25, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the same as last year. The engines must be used in two consequtive races, ie. the exact same engines. The engines can't be rebuilt, otherwise they'd be brand new. It must be the same as the previous race. Same as last year. Manipe 23:24, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Tks to you guys. Perhaps the engines section of the article should say so. Moriori 23:28, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Anyone have the gen one engines?

message: Is there any difference(in terms of appearance) between the Red Bull Racing cars and the Scuderia Toro Rosso cars? It's hard to tell based on the photos.
:Well, all F1 cars look the same these days anyway, don't they? Well, strictly speaking, the STR01 is basically an updated RB1 (last year's RBR car), wheras the RB2 is a new concept, built from stratch. STR say that the car is not an updated RB1, because all teams have to build their own chassis, but one can only assume it is. Manipe 12:41, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you're talking about livery, STR updated their livery from the one they used off season, it's now a darker blue with a bit of dark red on the engine cover. Looks a bit like the Midland from a distance, head-on. AlbinoMonkey (Talk) 03:44, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Quick Question

message: I didn't hear anything about Del Monte becoming MF1's third driver for San Marino. After the signing, Kolles said that "we look forward to seeing more of his potential at a future Grand Prix weekend."  That doesn't suggest San Marino. As far as I know, MF1 are yet to confirm their third driver for San Marino. I expect a preview from them in the coming days, but until then we should leave Del Monte in the test drivers column. Also, I think they should be kept in the test driver column until they actually appear as third driver at a Grand Prix weekend, like Adrian Sutil who has yet to appear as a MF1 third driver. Manipe 22:37, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Midland says he is joining as "test and reserve driver" (). Doesn't that mean he's the third driver?? AlbinoMonkey (Talk) 23:34, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I'm concerned a reserve driver doesn't mean third driver, although for most teams it usually does. A reserve driver is one who steps in for a driver who is unable to drive, in the presence of sickness. This driver doesn't have to be the team's third driver. Manipe 17:18, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Since Mondini will be MF1's third driver for Imola  I've taken Sutil and Del Monte from the third driver column and put them in the test drivers column. Manipe 15:54, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Del Monte as third driver? 

message: Since FIA remove the 107% gap in the qualifying session in 2003, that's are not driver could be excluded in race day. So why you still include driver not qualify in the color code??? I really not understands??? Aleenf1 08:10, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The colour codes are constant over every season on Wikipedia, so if we removed it then it wouldn't be an option for all the seasons when the 107% (and other) rules were in place. I don't think it makes that much of a difference to be honest. AlbinoMonkey (Talk) 12:23, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOT Qualified 

message: Ide had been stripped his Super License and miss out F1, and Montagny will race in Spain and Monaco. While no mention about it??? Aleenf1 07:44, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold and add it. (Note that the replacement is already mentioned in the article, but the FIA's revocation of Yuji Ide's Super licence is not.) Majin Izlude 07:57, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ide Out 

message: Anyone know what nationality Red Bull are registered as? Previous versions of this page had Red Bull as Austrian, but it has recently been changed to UK. The registration with the FIA is the only way to cover this (although it leads to oddities like Benetton having been registered as both a UK and an Italian team during its lifetime.....). 4u1e
(P.S. if anyone knows what nationality Brabham was registered as, I'd be interested. The article currently calls it an Australian team, but in practice it was based in the UK but largely staffed by Aussies and Kiwis. I suspect it was not registered as Australian, but would like confirmation. Ta. 4u1e)
:(P.P.S If Red Bull is Austrian, then this page needs swapping back. If it is UK, then the 2005 season article needs altering to reflect this).
: I cant find any confirmation on fia.com, but autosport.com lists them with the Austrian flag. --Windsok 13:07, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to this FIA statement (released 2 days ago), RBR are most certainly Austrian. AlbinoMonkey (Talk) 12:18, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red Bull UK or Austrian 

message: There are two weird things to do with Team Nationalities in this article:
1. Red Bull is listed as British and Austrian at different parts of the article, which are they?
2. Why are MF1 listed as Russian? Apart from one of their extra drivers being Russian, I can't see an association, I can't see any reason not to list them as British but I won't change it as there must be a reason for this. - MTC 17:15, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Officially, a team nationality is determined by which national motorsport authority they get their racing license from. MF1 are Russian, because they run under a Russian license (http://www.manipef1.com/news/2005/index.php?id=1200), but Red Bull are currently British (Because they run with a British license), but have lodged an application for an Austrian license, thus it is showing in the constructors' table that they are Austrian. Officially though, they are not. You may change it to British if you want, and then we can change it back when they do get their license from Austrian authorities. A team's nationality has no connection with the nationality of their drivers, though. Manipe 21:39, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See also discussion two headings up ^^. The conclusion there was that Red Bull is effectively Austrian. The FIA are treating them as such, at least, although I imagine Manipe is correct on the rules. The article should certainly be internally consistent. 4u1e 12:56, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well just to make the entire article consistant I've chnged the UK flag into an Austrian flag in the constructors points table, everything now says they're Austrian - MTC 16:24, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I had taken the liberty of changing Red Bull's flag from Austrian to British for the 2005 season, because they entered undera British licence that season. The changed to Austrian for 2006, IIRC. Lustigson 15:09, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Renault is a British team now, but it wasn't in 2006. Team nationality is determined by its racing licence - if it runs with a British licence, it's a British team. They had a French licence in 2006, and a British one now. Bretonbanquet (talk) 11:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team Nationalities 

message: I'm not sure if I'm missing something completely obvious, but what is the difference between the Constructors - Standing by Team and Standing by Driver sections, apart from that in one, each row is split into two whilst in the other they're just on different lines??? AlbinoMonkey (Talk) 12:23, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see very little difference also, and would like to get rid of the "Standing by Team" table. The colors were originally distributed after which team got the most points in a race – i.e. in the Spanish GP, McLaren's best result was Räikkönen 5th place, but the team would still be colored bronze, as they were the 3rd most scoring team. I found that to be very confusing. I'd like for that table to be deleted. (See also 2005 Formula One season#Standing by team) --Fred Bradstadt 13:07, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Shouldn't the contructors tables that has the summary of team start, wins etc have 22 starts? Each team has two starts per race. Jimmmmmmmmm 12:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  new constructors table 

message: The discussion of the British GP says that Alonso for only one lap not clinched Grand Chelem.  Can someone translate that into English? HenryFlower 14:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it means he got the win from pole, led every lap and got fastest lap, but yes it does need a translation or something.  Can someone confirm my understanding? --Jsydave 14:15, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It means he got pole, win, fastest lap, and led every lap except one. ie, if it had not been for that lap, he'd have got the "Grand Chelem". – AlbinoMonkey (Talk) 15:04, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  "Chelem" is literal translation French for "Slam". Grand Chelem means winning everything; Grand Slam. Bit like Grand Prix is French for Big Prize. F1 has French influences. --MonkeyMumford 15:51, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I tried to make that sentence easier to read... Majin Izlude 05:24, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  British GP 

message: Could someone write about the fact that Sakon Yamamoto will be replacing Montagny from the German GP and that Super Aguri will be introducing their new car as well.
Also the change in qualifying rules need to be reflected. I cannot do the same myself as I am still new to using computers.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.132.55.104 (talk • contribs) 10:59, 20 July 2006  (UTC)
:Both have been noted in the article already.  The qualifying change is discussed here, and Yamamoto is mentioned in the article's Notes section along with the other in-season driver changes.  --Majin Izlude 11:27, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yamamoto replacement and change in qualifying 

message: Anyone care to include a section on the 'Mass Damper' that seems to have caused such a turnaround in Renaults fortunes, i know nothing personally about what it is, but it may turn out to be crucial for the rest of the season.  --born against 08:51, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I'll have a go :-) --Skully Collins Review Me! Please? 09:47, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There - I had a good go at it and as many of you guys probably know, my grammer sucks, so can someone do a copyedit for me, thanks :-) --Skully Collins Review Me! Please? 10:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have researched the background and edited, including the rule number from the Regulations, the dates etc.  I think my review must have immediately followed somebody else's (anon user 86.135.90.6) - apologies!... --Hassocks5489 12:40, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem ;-) Anyway, thanks for the quick repsonce and copyediting, much appreciated :-) --Skully Collins Review Me! Please? 12:42, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mass Damper 

message: I'm going to change the references into the preferred standard. I've made a small start on the information that I added today, and I'll finish the job later. Its on my todo list. --T. Moitie [talk] 13:31, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foot notes 

message: Is the artical not a bit long and takes a while to read.  I have tried deleting repeat information etc.  But there are 4 tables in a row and the consurutors and drivers tables have the same data twice just in a different order —The preceding unsigned comment was added by  86.131.125.100 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 17 September 2006  (UTC)
:Constructors table shows the current standings of the constructors and the drivers table shows the current standings of the drivers. They are not the same!!--Macwomble 19:03, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: User: 86.131.125.100 was referring to the big race result table and the smaller starts/points/poles/wins/podiums/fastest laps table for each group as having "the same data twice."  I disagree, as the latter has stats that are not present in the former (namely poles and fastest laps) as well as stats that can be compiled (but take a great deal more time to tabulate) from the big table.  Majin Izlude talk 16:10, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Long? 

message: Spyker is name of Midland F1 after Italian Grand Prix, why the team name doesn't change? --Aleenf1 06:18, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering the same thing. I mean, they changed their name to Spyker MF1, and they are now referred to as Spyker by both the FIA and the FOA, as well as by the media. On Wikipedia itself there are already two different articles for Midland and Spyker. So, I think the name should be changed. Nevertheless, it's unclear whether they were allowed to change the Russian license with a Dutch one. See also Spyker MF1 – formula1.com – Luxic 18:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spyker 

message: To those debating the Schumacher incident at Monaco: Schumacher's admission refers to his initial mistake in locking up at the end of his lap - putting this in is not slanderous (would it not be libel if written anyway? :)). Perhaps the wording could be clarified? 4u1e
: If he said "he locked up", you can say he said "he locked up". If he said "he made a mistake" you can say he said "he made a mistake". Do you need more examples for clarification? Ernham 17:03, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I think I understand it quite well! 'Locking up' is of course a mistake, so it wouldn't really be a problem to say 'mistake'. However, I think the current wording covers his mistake using the words he used. Cheers. --4u1e 18:07, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accident etc 

message: You can state that Alonso was x tenths faster at the end of the first sector, or the beginning of the second, but you cannot say "he was likely". That is entirely speculative.Ernham 17:01, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm inclined to agree with this one, though - the implication is sufficient and I've seen plenty of laps that looked fantastic halfway through peter out before the finish line. --4u1e 18:08, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: True, but considering he missed out by only 0.064 of a second, if you subtract the time he lost when having to slow down as he came across Schumacher, I'm 110% certain that Alonso would have taken pole. He was definitely likely to take pole, at the very least. Manipe 18:21, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specualtion on Alonso's qualifying run in Monaco 

message: I have some doubts on the treatment of MF1 Racing in this article. Though MF1 Racing (as Midland F1 Racing) and Spyker F1 (as Spyker MF1 Team) are described in parallel at "Drivers and constructors", is this correct? It is true that Spyker purchased MF1 Racing. But, was constructor's name (MF1 Racing) in the entry list changed at the last 3 races? In my recognition, I think that Spyker arranges her own name as a title sponsor in front of the name of the MF1 Racing, because the approvals of other all team were necessary for the change the constructor's name (Or, did Spyker obtain this approval for the participation in 2006 season? ). To begin with, wasnot the name of the constructor's name in the entry list not Midland F1 Racing but MF1 Racing? --Morio 17:56, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. The team name at the start of the season was MF1 Racing, and Spyker became title sponsor for the last three races. Don Speekingleesh 22:01, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Spyker was not title sponsor.  All FOM information refered to the team as "Spyker."  They would not refer to a team by their sponsor. The359 23:04, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't matter what the FOM say. All the matters is what the FIA say. And they refer to the team as MF1 Racing. See the Brazil results: http://www.fia.com/sport/Championships/F1/F1_Classifications/2006/Brazil/race_class.html --Don Speekingleesh 11:47, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: http://www.fia.com/sport/Championships/F1/F1_Season_Guide/2006.html  The constructor's championship lists them as Spyker MF1 Team. The359 12:27, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because that season guide lists the title sponsors.Don Speekingleesh 19:00, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So does every other team on the results page you linked to.  So clearly the FIA is contradicting itself. The359 21:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Agreed and confirmed at . The team was officially named MF1 Racing at the start of this season and was not able to change its name without unanimous consent which was never granted (nor was it sought as far as I know). Neither Spyker F1 nor Spyker MF1 exist at present (although the 2007 entry list may say different - I haven't checked!) Jsydave 15:52, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Fair enough then the pages are set up right enough. Spyker MF1 redirects to Spyker F1 and MF1 Racing redirects to Midland F1. Only question I have is that the results for the team are reflected on the info boxes for both. I would say Spyker F1 did not take part at all in 2006 so they should not have a 2006 championship position - even though it refers back to MF1 it is still misleading Jsydave 16:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spyker MF1 or Spyker F1 

message: I've added a "Budget" column in the "Drivers and constructors" table on 25 April 2007. I found this information important for this money-driven modern sport, and that should benefit the article. It was removed on 17 July 2007 by User:Mark83 giving two resaons:
"1) It's not standard"
"2) They are presented as FACT, however they are a magazine's educated GUESS)"
2. They aren't facts, that's true, so I replaced the information under a "estimated budget" title, but they are better than just a guess: they are the closest possible estimations from a specialized publication, and real figures are unavailable.
1. I wish it could be standard! This information is precious, and I would ask wikipedia to provide the teams budgets for each season. Standards can evolve.
But feel free to remove again this column, I won't argue. -- Marc Lacoste 11:00, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Link is now broken and therefore the numbers have no source. When a new source appears, perhaps the numbers could be added somewhere else. As for now, I've removed them and made the table conform to the standard used for every other F1 season table on Wikipedia. --Jimmy Magnusson (talk) 10:54, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Budget 

message: :Image:Renault china race.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Renault china race.JPG

message: Does anyone have the skills/enthusiasm to crop the Alonso, Fisichella and Schumacher/engine photos? They each have a lot of "white space" around the car. DH85868993 (talk) 10:58, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 

message: Why are drivers who did not participate in races at all during the year being included in drivers tables? Delete immediately please. --Falcadore (talk) 14:37, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Test drivers 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.formula1.com/news/3984.html
** In 2006 Formula One season on 2011-05-26 02:03:04, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 Formula One season on 2011-06-13 17:39:22, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 17:39, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.formula1.com/news/3882.html
** In 2006 Formula One season on 2011-05-26 02:03:04, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 Formula One season on 2011-06-13 17:39:32, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 17:39, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 2 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.formula1.com/race/news/4426/757.html
** In 2006 Formula One season on 2011-05-26 02:03:04, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 Formula One season on 2011-06-13 17:39:45, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 17:40, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 3 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.formula1.com/archive/grandprix/2006/757/24.html#
** In 2006 Formula One season on 2011-05-26 02:03:04, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 Formula One season on 2011-06-13 17:39:53, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 17:40, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 4 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.formula1.com/race/news/4428/757.html
** In 2006 Formula One season on 2011-05-26 02:03:04, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 Formula One season on 2011-06-13 17:40:06, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 17:40, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 5 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.formula1.com/news/4925.html
** In 2006 Formula One season on 2011-05-26 02:03:04, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Formula One season on 2011-05-27 15:03:53, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 Formula One season on 2011-06-13 17:40:14, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 17:40, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 6 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.formula1.com/news/4979.html
** In 2006 Formula One season on 2011-05-26 02:03:04, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 Formula One season on 2011-06-13 17:40:23, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 17:40, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 7 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.formula1.com/news/4974.html
** In 2006 Formula One season on 2011-05-26 02:03:04, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 Formula One season on 2011-06-13 17:40:35, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 17:40, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 8 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.formula1.com/insight/technical_analysis/race/2005/748/197.html
** In 2006 Formula One season on 2011-05-26 02:03:06, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 Formula One season on 2011-06-13 17:40:53, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 17:41, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 9 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.grandprix.com/f12006calendar.html
** In 2006 Formula One season on 2011-05-26 02:03:06, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 Formula One season on 2011-06-13 17:40:55, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 17:41, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 10 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on 2006 Formula One season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061208123330/http://www.formula1.com:80/news/3882.html to http://www.formula1.com/news/3882.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:04, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on 2006 Formula One season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060720091245/http://www.itv-f1.com:80/News_Article.aspx%3FPO_ID%3D36612 to http://www.itv-f1.com/News_Article.aspx?PO_ID=36612
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060901003154/http://www.fia.com:80/resources/documents/1603301296__2006_F1_TECHNICAL_REGULATIONS.pdf to http://www.fia.com/resources/documents/1603301296__2006_F1_TECHNICAL_REGULATIONS.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060901003154/http://www.fia.com:80/resources/documents/1603301296__2006_F1_TECHNICAL_REGULATIONS.pdf to http://www.fia.com/resources/documents/1603301296__2006_F1_TECHNICAL_REGULATIONS.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061019041122/http://www.formula1.com:80/news/3984.html to http://www.formula1.com/news/3984.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061020133028/http://www.formula1.com:80/race/news/4426/757.html to http://www.formula1.com/race/news/4426/757.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060705173754/http://www.formula1.com:80/archive/grandprix/2006/757/24.html to http://www.formula1.com/archive/grandprix/2006/757/24.html#
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060906110504/http://www.formula1.com:80/race/news/4428/757.html to http://www.formula1.com/race/news/4428/757.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070212174557/http://www.planet-f1.com:80/News/Story_Page/0,15909,3210_3463_1649211,00.html to http://www.planet-f1.com/News/Story_Page/0,15909,3210_3463_1649211,00.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100722011837/http://www.formula1.com:80/results/driver/2006/ to http://www.formula1.com/results/driver/2006/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100712072245/http://www.formula1.com:80/results/team/2006/ to http://www.formula1.com/results/team/2006/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060304134614/http://www.fia.com:80/sport/Championships/F1/F1_Season_Guide/2006.html to http://www.fia.com/sport/Championships/F1/F1_Season_Guide/2006.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051229232715/http://www.manipef1.com:80/season/2006/ to http://www.manipef1.com/season/2006/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060317233858/http://www.grandprix.com/f12006calendar.html to http://www.grandprix.com/f12006calendar.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060212073616/http://www.chicanef1.dyndns.org:80/calendar.pl?year=2006 to http://chicanef1.dyndns.org/calendar.pl?year=2006
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:14, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 2006 Formula One season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fia.com/sport/Championships/F1/F1_Classifications/2006/Championship/2006.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.pitpass.com/fes_php/pitpass_news_item.php?fes_art_id=28765
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070607132059/http://www.fia.com/mediacentre/Press_Releases/FIA_Sport/2005/December/011205-01.html to http://www.fia.com/mediacentre/Press_Releases/FIA_Sport/2005/December/011205-01.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fia.com/resources/documents/548514743__2006_F1_SPORTING_REGULATIONS.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fia.com/sport/Championships/F1/F1_Classifications/2006/Championship/2006.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:35, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 2006 Formula One season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060901003154/http://www.fia.com/resources/documents/1603301296__2006_F1_TECHNICAL_REGULATIONS.pdf to http://www.fia.com/resources/documents/1603301296__2006_F1_TECHNICAL_REGULATIONS.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060901003154/http://www.fia.com/resources/documents/1603301296__2006_F1_TECHNICAL_REGULATIONS.pdf to http://www.fia.com/resources/documents/1603301296__2006_F1_TECHNICAL_REGULATIONS.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061019041122/http://www.formula1.com/news/3984.html to http://www.formula1.com/news/3984.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061208123330/http://www.formula1.com/news/3882.html to http://www.formula1.com/news/3882.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061020133028/http://www.formula1.com/race/news/4426/757.html to http://www.formula1.com/race/news/4426/757.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060705173754/http://www.formula1.com/archive/grandprix/2006/757/24.html# to http://www.formula1.com/archive/grandprix/2006/757/24.html#
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060906110504/http://www.formula1.com/race/news/4428/757.html to http://www.formula1.com/race/news/4428/757.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified