lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kraut

message: *See Talk:Pejorative terms for Germans
----
I have reverted this page because I see no reason to remove cross references (links) without giving any reason. This must have been a mistake.  --KF 02:43, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)

message: I refuse to beleive that the British eat more sauerkraut than the Germans.  From whence do "the statitics" come ?  jmd 05:11, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brits eating more Sauerkraut --- never! 

message: I changed the translation of "Weißkraut" from green cabbage to white cabbage. "Grünkohl" is green cabbage in Germany. Further green cabbage types are "Wirsing" and "Spitzkohl".
I also made the definition of Sauerkraut more precise, i.e. it is made from shredded white cabbage.
85.22.13.112 21:16, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad Translation 

message: I thought the perjorative use of kraut against the German soldiers was due to, not just that it was a part of German cuisine, its Vitamin C content so as not to contract scurvy, that same reason Brits were called limeys. Any evidence of this? Camm1987 (talk) 07:47, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the article still doesn't make it clear that this is American slang which only entered British usage as a result of Hollywood war films in the 1950s. More on the etymology would help - presumably the term has its origins in derogatory terms for German immigrants in US East Coast cities, much like 'wop' and 'polack'. --Ef80 (talk) 20:21, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Wartime Usage

message: * Nach meiner Information stammt der Begriff aus der Seefahrt. Nach der Endeckung des Vitamin Cs  & seiner vorbeugenden Wirkung gegen Skorbut wurden auf den Schiffen entsprechende Nahrungsmittel mitgeführt. Das waren auf englischen Schiffen Zitronen (search for translation & enjoy it), wegen vorhandener tropischer Kolonien. Bei bremischen & hamburgischen Kauffahrern war es hauptsächlich Weisskraut 88.67.221.238 (talk) 06:30, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Herkunft aus der Seefahrt 

message: "It is considered offensive by some Germans.[2][3]"
This isn't worthy of a mention at this part in the article without proper citation.  One German saying its comparable to British people being called cabbages (that is what the source for "some Germans" says) isn't worth a mention on Wikipedia.  A proper source needs to be found if an editor finds the mention necessary.
:It is properly referenced that it is offensive for germans regardless how amusing others think it is. Lembit Staan (talk) 22:05, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slang:Offensive 

message: Alot of Germans I've seen online use it as a term to refer to themselves, I've never seen it used as a pejorative nor have I ever seen a German take offense to it. It would be worth looking into this and finding a reliable source to make this change. 89.100.127.214 (talk) 01:27, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most Germans don't find this offensive
Talk:Hipparchus

message: An ancient star map being credited to Hipparchus was discovered as a document in a palimpsest, meaning that it had been scraped off & the parchment reused for a a religious codex. Having recognized it as a palimpsest, researchers looking for earlier texts viewed it through multispectral imaging & found the astronomical work.
*
*
Peaceray (talk) 21:55, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discovery of ancient star map  

message: It is suggested here that this carved (16th century) Lapis Lazuli at the Fitzwilliam museum may represent Hipparchus. –jacobolus (t) 15:59, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  More images 

message: Many of the "works cited" were not ever explicitly cited, so I removed them. It's plausible they would be useful to cite, or worth adding to the "further reading" section. –jacobolus (t) 20:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thinned "works cited" section
Talk:East China Normal University

message: Looks like a straight rip from the web.  Clashes with alternate historical account (unmerged; currently at bottom of page) and needs checking and a rewrite! -- prat
I've updated some of its contents & added some illustrations. Most of the contents appears to have been lifted verbatim from the East China Normal University website.Davy
My housemate says ECNU is comparable to the USA's UCLA but UCLA is better. China's higher institutions/universities are undergoing a major overhaul to make them competitive. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_in_Mainland_China#Rankings
--TaylorWW (talk) 15:17, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

message: In this diff. I can't make heads or tails of it. I was done by a new user, and I wish it was done in stages. It shows removal of a couple of thousand characters with the edit summary "more information". The result is a huge overhaul of section headings, and a wall of text. Please consider reverting. I don't know what to do. Help! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:33, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massive modification 
Talk:Zonophone

message: "When HMV and Columbia(UK) merged to form Electrical and Musical Industries, Ltd. (EMI), the lower-priced labels of the two firms were merged also as Regal Zonophone, which continued until c. 1949."
This suggests that the Regal Zonophone brand name has not been used since 1949, which is plainly not the case at all.
As implied by the Regal Zonophone article, EMI used the Regal Zonophone name continuously from the 1930s until at least the 1970s, and then resurrected the marque again in the 1990s.  217.155.20.163 00:42, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Longevity

message: There is the term about "Illegal recordings" - should these just mean Illegal Records - i am not sure what it could mean at all. Any help? --Alexander.stohr (talk) 22:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification needed? 

message: I am moving the following uncited material here until it can be properly supported with inline citations of reliable, secondary sources, per WP:V, WP:CS, WP:IRS, WP:PSTS, WP:BLP, WP:NOR, et al. This diff shows where it was in the article. Nightscream (talk) 14:10, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncited material in need of citations

message: does the name mean 217.107.106.66 (talk) 09:25, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What
Talk:Arcade (architecture)

message: Aragon is not a province of Spain...
85.61.24.204 08:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

message: How does the series of arches in a normal arcade "counterthrust"? Maury Markowitz (talk) 10:59, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Counterthrusting? 

message: Would the galleries surrounding the central temple of Angkor Wat qualify as a "blind gallery"? Boneyard90 (talk) 18:57, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Angkor Wat 

message: EACH arch isn't supported by a colonnade; each arch is supported by two columns, or the entire arcade is supported by a colonnade. 
2600:1700:4CA1:3C80:1EB:B31E:9221:C660 (talk) 00:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  EACH arch isn't supported by a colonnade 

message: we have a red link to arcade gear. Is it clearly identifiable concept? Estopedist1 (talk) 07:00, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: ??? Can't see this here. Johnbod (talk) 13:50, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arcade gear?
Talk:Frank R. Stockton

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drives
Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips for writing better articles. -- Yamara 00:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I thought I was the only one who was really "hooked" on Frank R. Stockton (1834-1902) until yesterday when I got information about discussions on the internet.  I feel Stockton has a great deal to offer our modern culture--in so many ways--about war, love for all kinds of people, history, "pixie" tongue-in-cheek humor, and more.  I think his stories can be read aloud and listened to with joy.  I have read a number of his stories onto cassette tapes.
	I would welcome hearing from any interested persons about why they like Stockton.
      Joe  5/30/03
I'm reading Kate Bonnet (available from gutenberg.org if you print it yourself, though trying to find information on the author and date of publishing, I saw it listed through Amazon at used book dealers). My side note is that reading the book I found at least the light-hearted tone of the movie "Pirates of the Carribean", though not the same story and i like his books and his face. -- Susan 4-17-06
His middle name is Richard, should someone include it? Nancy.Gallant 23:01, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: I guess a bunch of stuff had to be reverted due to copyvio. Unfortunately it got reverted back to a vandalized version that talked about a fictitious career as a hot-dog eater. Also unfortunately it's never revived. I might try to expand later.--T. Anthony (talk) 21:07, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pretty meager 

message: Lynne Vallon (http://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/lion_and_the_unicorn/v021/21.3br_rahn.html) says that Suzanne Rahn (in Rediscoveries in Children's Literature) credits Stockton with founding America's kids' fantasy.  Can some-one look at Rahn and check this and incorporate it if it is the case?Kdammers (talk) 04:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  father of American children's fantasy? 
Talk:Give Me Convenience or Give Me Death

message: *1. 2:25 Police Truck 
*2. 2:41 Too Drunk To Fuck 
*3. 3:27 California Uber Alles 
*4. 3:02 The Man With The Dogs 
*5. 1:40 Insight 
*6. 2:40 Life Sentence 
*7. 0:55 A Child And His Lawnmower 
*8. 3:45 Holiday In Cambodia 
*9. 2:18 I Fought The Law 
*10. 4:20 Saturday Night Holocaust 
*11. 5:53 Pull My Strings 
*12. 0:28 Short Songs 
*13. 2:13 Straight A's 
*14. 4:17 Kinky Sex Makes The World Go Round 
*15. 3:48 The Prey 
*16. 5:10 Night Of The Living Rednecks 
*17. 2:24 Buzzbomb From Pasadena
This was in the article body, nothing else. No artist info, no record label, nothing. --Dante Alighieri 01:00 31 May 2003 (UTC)
:I think it's by the Dead Kennedys... lemme look... hey, cool, I was right. Guess I could write a stub... -- Wapcaplet 01:07 31 May 2003 (UTC)
::I just have to say this... does anyone else think the head looks like Eddie McGuire? -- Sarsaparilla39 01:31, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I believe an image showing the back cover of this album would be a very valuable contribution, not only to this article, but to Wikipedia. It it referenced in the article Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima#In other media. Anyone who can get this image it would be highly appreciated. Thank you. --MECU≈talk 18:24, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Back Cover Image

message: I have found such an instance. Should we mention it, and if so, where?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.220.58.135 (talk) 21:20, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use in other works
Talk:Politician

message: Rewrote section and added references.  The term politician can have very broad definitions.  I will wait a reasonable amount of time before removing tag.   Phoenician Patriot (talk) 16:52, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced section -- Considered a politician 

message: The current version of the article says:
The source (legal-explanations.com) cited for Homeowner associations says:
and the source (dictionary.com) cited for block watches says:
These sources do not substantiate the assertions made that members of homeowners' associations and of neighborhood block watch units are considered politicians. These sources merely provide definitions for the terms.
Members of homeowners' associations and of neighborhood watch units are not generally considered politicians (although they might be considered politicians with regard to the activities of the local communities in some circumstances). The article's sentence needs to be better sourced, or those two claims I've referred to here should be removed.  Dezastru (talk) 19:42, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this is old, but I just saw it now, and fully agree—I've removed those 2 from the article. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:50, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Considered a Politician 

message: Needs a gut rewrite. Fails on so many levels right now is just a good example of a bad article. First you need to make clear the difference between a politician and someone exercising authority on another basis, such as a monarch or military commander. Second the fine gradations of the political class and their activities and functions as such (distinct from the socially useful ones, the executed office) should form the body. Finally, as ever, the core concept needs to be made clear in the lede. A politician is a person who must obtain a consensus in a political body. The non-politician executing the same function does not. Lycurgus (talk) 05:06, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It is problematic to define the scope of an article on this topic. I have half a mind to propose merger with Politics - if anyone can point the way to making "Politician" a separate worthwhile encyclopedic article, please state: Noyster  (talk),  14:30, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags understate the situation 

message: Should current and recent candidates in the 2016 US Presidential election include politician among their notable occupations in the lead of their biographical articles, even if the candidate eschews the term? Please participate in a Request for Comment on this question. General Ization Talk    14:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC opened: Should current and recent candidates for US President be called "politicians"?

message: As long as I live I was under the presumption that a politician, at least in a democratic society, is a representative of the people by whom he/she was chosen.
Perhaps a correction of the wiki entry is neccessary?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpaxel (talk • contribs) 12:42, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The most important characterization of a politician left out?
Talk:The Adventures of Brisco County, Jr.

message: *"Set in the American West of 1893,...
*"Professor Wickwire returns many times in the series to assist with technology, including tinkering with motorcycles and rescuing the heroes with a helium-filled zeppelin."
*From Helium - "The formal discovery of the element was made in 1895 by two Swedish chemists, Per Teodor Cleve and Nils Abraham Langlet, who found helium emanating from the uranium ore cleveite. In 1903, large reserves of helium were found in natural gas fields in parts of the United States, which is by far the largest supplier of the gas today."
It is more likely that the zeppelin was filled with hydrogen, which was already in use for balloons in the US Civil War. But since this is fiction anything's possible. If anyone has access to a source this should be checked. Rezin (talk) 19:17, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The show abounds in anachronism for comedic effect, and this is one of those cases. It's clearly stated by the Wickwire character that he's using helium in that particular scene. Cheers, AstroCog (talk) 04:31, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Figures. Thanks for making sure. Rezin (talk) 21:31, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Helium 

message: Netflix has advertised a continuation of this show, starring Bruce Campbell with some new characters of course. Any chance of someone writing an article or at least a subsection about it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.71.112.153 (talk) 22:03, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revival/Reboot 

message: Anyone is free to help maintain the featured status of this article by addressing some of the following comments. This article looks to be in good shape and well-researched. There are maybe some questionable sources (Greg Sutter Website, etc.) and an unreferenced sentence but nothing seems worrisome. The citations should be checked for proper  capitalization formatting. The cast section needs some alterations to align more closely with MOS:TVCAST. I have access to USA Today Nielsen ratings so I may add the viewership per episode myself when I have the time. Heartfox (talk) 20:16, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:URFA/2020]] notes
Talk:Circulatory system

message: Shouldn't "For plants, see Vascular tissue" be more like "For the plant vascular system, see Vascular tissue"? Not even sure how I would word it, but writing just "plants" doesn't really seem to flow well in my opinion. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 09:33, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "For plants, see Vascular tissue" 

message: the link for hemocytes should be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemocyte_(invertebrate_immune_system_cell) 2405:6E00:2650:AEBF:DC5:B61B:BE6C:91D8 (talk) 08:56, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hyphenation Expert (talk) 18:18, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 March 2024 

message: cardio vascular Systerm 203.189.185.135 (talk) 05:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sincse
Talk:Blood

message: Got source for one tagged citation needed, and its in https://www.britannica.com/science/hemoglobin. Please edit inside if yo're an administrator or when protection goes off. BaronHerzog (talk) 04:05, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Blood Color - Hemoglobin 38.7.66.122 (talk) 20:55, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I would add the sentence "Novel edidence 38.7.66.122 (talk) 20:56, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Blood color due to Oxygenation

message: I would add the sentence "Novel evidence has shown hemerythrin to be a multi-functional protein – contributing to things like innate immunity and tissue regeneration in worms." to add some more context to what it is about if people don't want to redirect to the other page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hadroncollider 666 (talk • contribs) 20:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: . Doesn't seem to be a major role of hemerythrin. The one source in that article doesn't say that this applies to all species. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (talk) 19:36, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blood Color - Hemerythrin edit 

message: — Assignment last updated by Thecanyon (talk) 05:33, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Technology and Culture

message: Lead section is super long. Could use some help cutting it down and redistributing information to other parts of the page. Just-a-can-of-beans (talk) 22:56, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganize lead
Talk:List of French monarchs

message: I'm going to start a gallery where we can add possible map candidates. After we have enough to choose from, we can talk about whether to use them, and if so, which ones.  Please add more, and put numbers on your captions so we can talk about them in the comments.
This is just a start, and we don't have to use any of these. I just wanted to get the ball rolling, so please add your map candidates, and then we can talk about them. Mathglot (talk) 23:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a good list, I like it. Thank you so much for your work. Altanner1991 (talk) 04:05, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  When I mentioned I was hoping for a gif showing the evolution, I meant something like this animated gif showing the Frankish expansion from 481 to 870, but spanning the period covered by this article instead. I'm still hoping to find something like that. Mathglot (talk) 07:37, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

text: I oppose any maps for the lead image. Restore the Coat of Arms image. GoodDay (talk) 20:01, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible map candidates 

message: I just fixed a bunch of Harv errors, and there are at least 2 or 3 more; don't know how this can be FL class with that. Mathglot (talk) 06:12, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please reassess 

message: I am inclined to add the fleur-de-lis on a azure field under the "arms" column, as used by Philip II onwards, to include Louis VII, and perhaps even Louis VI, as there is evidence that they both used at least the fleur-de-lis charge on its own as a sort of quasi-heraldic symbol (though admittedly, less so for Louis VI). I say this because the "List of English Monarchs" page has Henry II associated with his quasi-heraldic arms. 
The only thing that is holding me back is the fact that I can not seem to find any sources on a, if any, color of the field on the arms that would have been typically associated with Louis VI or Louis VII's versions of the fleur-de-lis. However, it may be reasonable to assume that azure/blue was used for the most part as well, just as Henry II of England's coat of arms is assumed to be on a red field as later English kings used.
However, I also can not find a source that states that Louis VII and Louis VI used a tessellation pattern of the fleur-de-lis as is known on Philip II's version of the royal arms. Perhaps a version of the arms with just a single fleur-de-lis can be found or created to account for this. 
What are some thoughts on this? If anyone has a source that goes into greater detail on Louis VI and/or Louis VII's use of quasi-heraldry, that would be greatly appreciated.  AngevinKnight1154 (talk) 02:21, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of quasi-heraldry for Louis VI and Louis VII
Talk:Santa Fe, New Mexico

message: Santa Fe doesn't even appear *in* the photo from the ISS - an area to the north of the city is shown. The description should be updated to reflect this.
86.20.245.227 (talk) 15:04, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISS Photo 

message: In 2000, on a bus traveling through Garden Grove, California, a Mexican-American said to me "Santa Fe. That is the place to be. Santa Fe." Should I add this to the article? Oglach na hEireann (talk) 07:13, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that wouldn't be encyclopedic, but that sounds like it was a nice interaction. Arlo James Barnes 07:10, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Santa Fe - the place to be 

message: I'm a bit puzzled by the little time-line box at the start of the History section, titled "Five Centuries of Colonization" and listing the timespans of Spanish, Mexican and US control of the Santa Fe, as it implies that the city is being colonized to this day. I don't see anything in the main article that supports this and I can't imagine it's a widely-held sentiment. Can we change it so something neutral? Lennart97 (talk) 18:31, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Five Centuries of Colonization" 

message: I was going to correct the census data based on the actual numbers at https://data.census.gov/profile/Santa_Fe_city,_New_Mexico?g=160XX00US3570500 but the thought occured to me that these numbers may be auto-extracted and the problem is systemic and not limited to this page.
The specific error that drew my attention is the claim that the percentage of the population 65+ is about 14%, but cenus.gov shows clearly that this refers only to the 65-74 group; the figure for 65+ is actually around 25%
Maybe someone who knows more about how census data ends up on a wikipedia place page like this could comment on whether there is a chance of this being a systemic mistake ? PaulDavisTheFirst (talk) 06:47, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Census data is wrong 

message: The correlation between the city’s climate and elevation, is not well illustrated on the article. @Kinu דולב חולב (talk) 01:52, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I think my edit was helpful for the average person in order to understand the city’s climate and its causes. דולב חולב (talk) 01:54, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate & elevation
Talk:Electric power transmission

message: Explain cause and effect of power transmissions and transport routes 2403:4800:2453:D601:CB95:E47F:FDDD:48F0 (talk) 09:53, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: History of electric power transmission. Reconrabbit 13:48, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  History