Template talk:Deletion debates

message: A long time ago, DRV podded off a subpage for templates.  I've taken the opportunity of a breather in userbox debates to bring them back to the main page, so I've removed it from this list. --Tony Sidaway 06:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: DRVU

message: Shouldn't speedy deletions be in the list? --GW_Simulations|User Page | Talk | Contribs | E-mail 21:19, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy

message: Every time I click on a link inside this box, I have to click twice: the first time I click, the box resizes but I don't go anywhere. The second time I actually go to the linked page. Is this a bug, or a feature?? ♥ Her Pegship♥ 21:07, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I came here to post that very problem, but I don't know what causes it. It only occurs on the pages on which it's transcluded, not on the template page itself. A bit of testing shows it's likely due to the nestedness of the tables; it doesn't occur if transcluded outside the table, but I couldn't find a way to get it to both be inside the larger table and not resize. Opabinia regalis 03:53, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resizing 

message: I put a  on Template:Please leave this line alone never (sandbox heading).  It tells me I shouldn't use PROD on a template (why?) and then that I should "Use one of the processes listed here".  Unfortunately, there are no processes listed here.-- Randall Bart 08:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I ran into the same problem —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.186.172.75 (talk) 11:45, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleting a template 

message: Deletion review is not actually an XfD Deletion debate. See WP:XFD.  It might help to make that clear on the template.  In addition to deletion review, should Wikipedia:Copyright problems and Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images be added to the template since they too are related debates like deletion review? -- Jreferee 22:26, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds like a good idea. You can use a horizontal rule to separate them. Shii (tock) formerly Ashibaka 02:10, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Related debates - proposed change

message: Something needs to be done about these categories:
* ChitraguptVanshi
* Chitranshi
It looks like the user think this is the place for articles. Are these necessary or not? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.186.172.75 (talk) 11:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleting / Fixing Categories ? 

message: Following a discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Proposal for minimising the number of relisted AfDs, I added links to "all" AfD/TfD/etc. discussions to accompany the links to "today" and "closing". The rationale for this was to make discussions more findable, so that they aren't just discussed on their first and last days. However, User:Ruslik0 reverted this, stating that it was "not very helpful". I've reverted back to my version. Discuss here if you still disagree. Bazonka (talk) 19:16, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ruslik0 has reverted again, stating that the template is "completely unusable in this form". Whilst I agree that it's not perfect, it's certainly not unusable. We must also bear in mind that this template is not intended to be used in normal article space and so links to category pages should not be disallowed. When I have more time I'll see if I can create proper pages to replace these, but in the meantime I argue that they still serve a purpose and can be used to find AfDs etc. that are not on their first or last day. Some discussion would be appreciated rather than just comments in edit summaries. Bazonka (talk) 06:57, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately I haven't been able to identify a method by which I can list all open debates, other than just referencing CAT:AFD. I can list all debates, including closed ones , but that is obviously inappropriate. CAT:AFD will have to do; it's not the prettiest solution, but it works. Bazonka (talk) 08:23, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to "All" discussions 

message: I think Holding cell should be linked to Templates row. It makes navigation much more easier an it's appropriate.--Rezonansowy (talk • contribs) 14:23, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I've done it, as well as redesign, to bypass this code mess (see edit history). --Rezonansowy (talk • contribs) 13:54, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holding cell 

message: The navboxes here are completely cluttery. I'll collapse them. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 14:16, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ugly 

message: There is too much in this template, it significantly hinders navigation (especially in the mobile version of Wikipedia). Marcocapelle (talk) 07:25, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Marcocapelle, you could add nomobile to  to hide it in mobile, or give it a unique class and hide it with CSS/JS personally. ― Qwerfjkltalk 13:44, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

text: Agreed; there should be a horizontal version, to be used at the bottom of articles. fgnievinski (talk) 22:55, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too big