Talk:Kip Thorne

message: Isn't this page missing a nobel prize medal?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Åke Lindblom (talk • contribs) 01:13, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Nobel Prize Medal?

message: What is "warpage and the quantum" supposed to mean in this article? --Constantine Evans 03:51, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The above question is an example of "wide-eyed optimism." It assumes that the person who used the phrase "warpage and the quantum" actually had an interest in communicating an idea to another person. Most likely, this hieratic pronouncement was meant to amaze and impress. Professor Thorne learned the technique from Professor Wheeler, who appears to derive much amusement from such assertions. "Warpage and the quantum" is meant to be stated with a condescending smile. If anyone presumes to ask its meaning, a perfect silence follows.152.163.101.9 13:41, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly how many documented instances do you have of said resultant Perfect Silence? I personally have never been condescended to in such a manner by Thorne, Wheeler, or any professional physicist. In my experience, Wheeler never resorted to obfuscation. What he did do was invent idioms to encode a lot of information in tractable packages. For the most part, physicists of my acquaintance tend to be eager to teach and generous with their time in doing so.    — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.223.130.32 (talk) 18:11, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

text: This is an incredibly late reply, but I would like to note that my question was not intended as wide-eyed optimism, but as skepticism. "Warpage and the quantum" doesn't make sense to me. I've never heard Kip say this, and have only heard one sane person use "warpage" (somone with LIGO, if I recall). I've removed it until someone can come up with a way to explain it. --Constantine Evans 07:14, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Warpage and the quantum

message: I was just reading the history of this Article, and it would seem that the name had been frequently changed from Kip S Thorne to Kip Dent. Has Kip ever been known as the latter? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by WASTREL (talk • contribs) 17:44, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so. That name change occurred just once, earlier this week, and was part of a vandalism spree. Also notice that the Kip Dent move was followed by a second move to an obviously absurd name. ×Meegs 18:29, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real name 

message: Thank you meegs; that is very helpful. But why would somebody want to vandalise Mr. Thorne? 
Anyway, I was also wondering whether what is said about Mr. Thorne being the first person to conduct research on time travel was true? Surely that has been something that man has looked into scientifically for hundreds, if not thousands of years? WASTREL 14:32, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr.Thorne 

message: I removed the following content from the article. It is trivia without sources and of dubious value and accuracy. Please refer to WP:BLP for Wikipedia policy on biographies of living persons. 
* A tale revealing of his brilliance: In the middle of a Caltech presentation entitled Einstein and the Astronomers: Testing Relativity 1914-1933, Kip Thorne was called upon to check the accuracy of a figure concerning the famed orbital anomaly (i.e., the precession of the perihelion) of Mercury that had baffled astronomers until Einstein provided an explanation. He quickly provided the solution on a manila folder, stating "it's 43 seconds of arc per century, not 0.43", and deconstructed the parlor trick he employed in a way that would make sense to only a few people on the planet.	 
* One of Thorne's greatest mentors has been John Wheeler. It was because of Wheeler that Thorne became so well known throughout the world.
* Kip Thorne knew Richard Feynman, another famous student of John Wheeler, and idolizes Albert Einstein, "the patron saint of relativity".
--Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:30, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: In the current article, there's a section devoted to an upcoming film adaptation of Kip Thorne's works on Black Holes. The film adaptation in question is Interstellar to be directed by Christopher Nolan for Warner Bros. and Paramount Films. As of now, the film has a release date of November 7, 2014 with casting discussions in place. Instead of posting all information about that movie in this section, isn't it better to start a new article named Interstellar (film)? I know that information on the film is scarce at the moment but its only a matter of time before more information becomes available.
--KrazzyDJ (talk) 15:09, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interstellar 

message: Does Kip Thorne's Hoop Conjecture disprove or contradict naked singularities? I find the phrase "cast aside the thought" unnecessarily ambiguous. Ceaseless (talk) 07:56, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black hole cosmology 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Kip Thorne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141205073511/http://video.wired.com/watch/exclusive-the-science-of-interstellar-wired to http://video.wired.com/watch/exclusive-the-science-of-interstellar-wired
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150814205320/http://www.las.iastate.edu/archive/plaza/one_name.php?id=1145 to http://www.las.iastate.edu/archive/plaza/one_name.php?id=1145
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:24, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: If the information in the article below is notable it should be merged into this article, there is not a particular reason I can see for it to be a standalone article. Phil (talk) 02:15, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed Merge proposal tag from the talk page since it is properly placed on the article as well. Operator873CONNECT 05:10, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

text: Support: I have no idea what Kip Thorne bet numerical relativitsts is, but it certainly isn't a proper article. Loooke (talk) 12:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger discussion 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kip Thorne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070703063220/http://www.ligo.caltech.edu/docs/G/G020325-00/G020325-00.pdf to http://www.ligo.caltech.edu/docs/G/G020325-00/G020325-00.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified