lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Electronic dance music-footer

message: No genres of Electronic art music are presented (just a link to, despite eight popular styles), making this Template:Popular electronic music. Hyacinth 19:55, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Popular music

message: there's a new genre of Electronic music popping up being called Indietronica. Should we possibly add this to the footer? --Threatis 20:32, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding Indietronica

message: eurodance should be removed its not a genre its a subgenre. it should be replaced with either Disco or Hi-nrg  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zenithsonzai (talk • contribs) 03:33, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, that's pretty subjective whether something is a genre or subgenre.  I would say that eurodance is large enough, and has been around long enough, to be a genre in its own right.  You wouldn't add disco to the template because not all disco music is electronic.  Most hi-nrg is electronic, however, hi-nrg isn't as recognizable as a genre name compared to eurodance. Squidfryerchef (talk) 02:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eurodance 

message: Ambient music is clearly not dance music. It is however included here directly by inclusion of Template:Electronic music navbox (which says nothing about dance).
Possible solutions:
* remove Ambient from that list
* expand this template as a more general electronic music template (including electronic art music, etc.)
* detach this template from the sub-template, making it into a separate list of dance genres
Can someone knowledgeable about the current usage of the templates suggest which would be best? I'm leaning on #3 currently. --Trɔpʏliʊm • blah 12:22, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem: Ambient 

message: Hey, I'm just wondering if Glitch (music) could be added to the list it is an EDM Genre and isn'tt shown on the footer or list, I'd appreciate it if you could help. Thanks from 121.214.0.44 (talk) 09:38, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glitch music genre
Category talk:Ethiopian people

message: I'm thinking this page ought to be titled "Ethopians" instead of "Ethopian People". Any thoughts?--Josiah 19:58, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)
:I am not against it, but only if this change is made throughout all people categories. gidonb 09:56, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Change
Talk:Jim Taricani

message: This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Jim Taricani.  The consensus was to keep it.  dbenbenn | talk 07:56, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page is completely and utterly biased , especially the last few sentences.  Not that I dont agree with it, but personal views or interpretations do not belong on Wikipedia.  Can someone fix this, please? 198.7.249.227 (talk) 23:42, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias? 
Talk:List of autistic fictional characters

message: Will this page last? cornince 1441 6 February 2005 CST
:I think it is much more likely to last if the list only included people who were identified in the piece of work or by the author as being autistic. If someone was added to the list because it is the personal opinion of a Wikipedian that the person exhibited autistic traits, but was not identified as autistic in the piece of work or was not identified as autistic by any of the work's creators, then it would constitute POV and original research, which might get this page in trouble. Q0 14:45, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Phidias

message: I read in a book, The Golden Ratio and Fibonacci Numbers by Richard A. Dunlap (c. 1997, World Scientific Publishing Co. Ltd.) that the Golden Mean is called "phi" in reference to Phidias.
It's not clear from here or the cross-linked Golden Ratio article here on Wikipedia whether this is considered correct or whether this particular Phidias is the same as the mathematician to which Dunlap refers.
Can anyone here confirm or refute this claim
* Highly unlikely as Phi is simply a greek letter, much as pi is. The ratio has become known by the name of the symbol. Lisiate 02:14, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Phidias as the namesake for Phi, the Golden Mean?

message: There aren't any, and I guess this article kind of needs them, as there's more information than would be normally in a single section. `T. S. Rice 23:36, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sections?

message: Why does the 'love of the sculptor for an Elian boy' link to the Pederasty page? That such an 'Elian boy' exists is far from factual and its inclusion seems gratuitous. I have removed it as a point of principle.  213.217.216.126  —The preceding  signed but undated. 
:Your edit is inappropriate as the love we are discussing falls within the purview of Greek pederasty, and your opinion on its veracity is of no encyclopedic concern. Haiduc 00:46, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: the Elian boy

message: Was Phidias' father Charmides one of the Thirty Tyrants of Athens or was it another person who just happened to have the same name and living around the same time period?--Apilok (talk) 20:23, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Thirty Tyrants of Athens?

message: I've reverted a good faith edit by an anon linking Archimedes whose father was also called Phidias in an unorthodos format. Do we want to incldue a proper dab link for thsi Phidias?--Peter cohen (talk) 20:50, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambig link to Archimedes? 

message: My statements here on the book were made as a result of these two links.
Thanks,
AndrewOne (talk) 07:53, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  B. Russell's ''History''... as evidence
Template talk:Geo-term-stub

message: What is this stub notice for? It sounds like its for definitoins of geographic terms (what else is there to write about geographic terms?). If that is so, shouldn't those articles be in wikitionary? Bawolff 22:20, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Have a look at some of the articles in the category: Global civilisation, Linear Reference System, Behavioral geography, Emergent coastline... all of them geographical terms which are not actual geographic locations, nor are they either topography or cartography. Grutness...wha? 13:57, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Newton scale

message: "He found that a litre of linseed oil at the temperature of melting snow grew to 1.0725 L at the temperature of boiling water."
For the sake of historical accuracy, could we please note the volume unit he actually used? The litre was defined about 100 years later—let alone its introduction in England. Crissov 22:47, 6 Feb 1894 (UTC)
thread_title:  Litre 

message: Why the aberrant spelling of (what I assume is meant to be) bismuth?  As far as I can tell, that has never been an acceptable spelling in English (it's not in the OED) although its spelt that way in several European languages. SpinningSpark 18:42, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bismut 

message: Is this symbol a wikipedism or is it actually attested? Urhixidur (talk) 17:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  °N 

message: The article claims that the Newton scale "has no single second reference point", but the Grigull reference states "Newton's scale has two defining fixed-points: the ice-point, where the Newton temperature tN = 0°N, and the temperature of the human body, where tN = 12°N". Pulu (talk) 20:42, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Defined Temperature 

message: It looks to me like some of the values in the table are not what Newton reported. The origional table can be found here https://ia800700.us.archive.org/2/items/philtrans07084697/07084697.pdf. For instance, what is listed in the table as 40°N looks like it was originally written as 40 4/5 °N. Similarly for 14°N, 20°N, and 28°N. Pulu (talk) 21:04, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Listed Temperatures have fractions? 

message: The scale that this article is describing is incredibly unknown to the majority of people. When the name "Newton scale" is brought up, people think of a fish scale that measures the weight acting on an object. It seems odd that this page is talking about temperature and not force (which is what a newton scale measures).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkParker1221 (talk • contribs) 00:05, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is very misleading in my opinion
Talk:List of stations in London fare zone 2

message: I'm proposing that we rename this article to Travelcard Zone 2, and amend the link texts on referring pages similarly. I explain why, and invite comments, on Talk:London Underground Zone 1. -- Chris j wood 22:54, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed article rename 
Talk:River Ogmore

message: All the other Rivers in Wales  are designated by River Name.
I would suggest  that this Article by moved to River Ogmore and Ogmore River  be used as the redirect. Is thatOK ?
Velela 22:53, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no objection - I was probably following an existing red link.  But I note that "Ogmore River" is marginally more common on Google than "River Ogmore". --Henrygb 23:48, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Ogmore River v. River Ogmore 

message: "The river Ogmore is generally considered to start near the cemetery mountain, north of Treorchy,...". Perhaps I have missed something but this seems impossible to me. Looking at the map, Treorchy is in the Rhonda Valley. Any river starting North of Treorchy would be the Rhonda itself or some river North East of the Rhonda. There is a mountain barrier between the Ogmore and Treorchy. Is there a reference for this statement? Budhen (talk) 15:28, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starting Point
Talk:List of stations in London fare zone 6

message: I'm proposing that we rename this article to Travelcard Zone 6, and amend the link texts on referring pages similarly. I explain why, and invite comments, on Talk:London Underground Zone 1. -- Chris j wood 22:55, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed article rename 

message: When were these stations (and the rest of their branches) added and why? All the maps up show them as outside. Timrollpickering 16:27, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: They are joining Zone 6 on Monday.  MRSC 16:41, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Epsom Downs and Tattenham Corner
Talk:Ole

message: I use ole as "old" such as "same ole"
Does that last line - in russian - have any meaning? If not, it should be deleted.
Olé is also used in portuguese in the same way as it is in spanish, be it in bullfightings or football.
Please make a page of Ole Viusal Basic.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.138.141.10 (talk) 05:28, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Robert the Bruce/Proposed decision

message: One of the proposed findings is
:It is the contention of Robert the Bruce that "there is a well orchestrated attempt by anti-circumcision activists to force their POV in related articles on Wikipedia".
Does an Aye vote indicate that you agree that Robert made the statement or that you agree that Robert's contention is correct?  Obviously there are several contributors who are strongly opposed to non-therapeutic circumcision.  However Robert's suggestion that contributors opposed to non-therapeutic circumcision are "well orchestrated" is not accurate and is a refection of his own pro-circumcision activism. -- DanBlackham 02:25, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It would just mean that they agree that this is what Robert says. Obviously nobody on ArbCom is going to take anybody's word for anything. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 15:30, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

text: * Including yours Tony, including yours. - Robert the Bruce 16:33, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

text: * Absolutely.  Including mine. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 16:58, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed findings
Talk:HMS Britannia (1904)

message: Articles on long dead battleships are not normally my thing, but I do have a certain connection with this one. My grandfather was onboard when she was torpedoed. Fortunately he survived, or I would not have been here to start the article. I hope the article doesn't trample too much on whatever conventions there are for articles of this type. -- Chris j wood 23:39, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting, thanks for writing it up. Bastie 08:35, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

message: Ordered: 1903/04 Estimates. Laid down: 4 February 1902. 
Was the ship laid down before it was ordered?
--Waugh Bacon (talk) 18:53, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well spotted. Janes certainly has a laid down date in February 1904, not 1902, so this looks like a possible typographical error. I've changed this in the article. Benea (talk) 18:53, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does the infobox for this article contain an error? 

message: The article previously had the unsourced claim that Britainnia was the last Royal Navy ship sunk in the war. This looks dubious, the minesweeper HMS Ascot (1916) was torpedoed and sunk the day after Britannia was sunk. Shrubb and Sainsbury's The Royal Navy day by day remarks that Ascot was the "last RN ship sunk in World War I" (page 313). There is a sort of source for Britannia, John Terraine's Business in Great Waters: The U-Boat Wars 1916-1945 page 140, which quotes Newbolt (presumably his official naval history of the war) "The Britannia was the last British warship sunk by the enemy." Possibly Newbolt overlooked the relatively minor loss of the minesweeper. Though you could start making cases for the 'last major warship sunk by the enemy', it's probably best to leave this out and simply state the date, and the proximity to the armistice. Ships continued to be lost to war causes after the armistice took place, mostly to minefields, and the British cruiser HMS Cassandra was lost to a German minefield in December 1918. Benea (talk) 17:25, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last ship sunk
Talk:Stephen Franklin (Babylon 5)

message: This article is over one page in size. Is this still a stub? I've unstubbed smaller pages... Wouter Lievens 23:45, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Still a stub?

message: Nothing was included on Dr. Franklin's stim use, which was a major part of his character arc in Season 3. Links to appropriate episodes were as a way to both cross-reference the piece and cite precise sources. This is my first major edit on Wikipedia, so I welcome and encourage constructive criticisms and helpful style tips from collaborators on this section.
nealklein 02:34, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Edit Justification
Talk:Commencement Bay-class escort carrier

message: By the way, is this page okay, copyrightwise, a fair use of text from http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/cve-105.htm ?
—wwoods 00:33, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair Use? 

message: The article states "unlike most earlier CVE classes which were laid down as something else and converted to aircraft carriers mid-construction, the Commencement Bays were built as carriers from the keel up." Excluding the single ship Long Island and Charger classes, there was the Sangamon class (4 ships), Bogue-class (11 ships), Casablanca-class (50 ship), in addition to the Commencement Bay-class (19 ship). 
Both the Casablanca and Commencement Bay classes were not conversions but rather ships constructed from the beginning as escort carriers. So if you include Long Island and Charger, then it is technically correct that "most" escort carriers were conversions. But if you only consider multi-ship class and the total number of ships as a whole, then the use of "most" is misleading. I think "some" is more accurate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tradermort (talk • contribs) 19:21, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Escort carrier conversion vs. keel-up construction 

message: For those who watches this page. I made some changes recently.
They are all come from:
* Paul Silverstone's book "The Navy of World War II, 1922-1947"
* Norman Polmar's book "Aircraft Carriers: A History of Carrier Aviation and Its Influence on World Events, Volume 1: 1909-1945"
* http://shipbuildinghistory.com/shipyards/large/toddtacoma.htm and http://www.alternatewars.com/BBOW/Stats/WW2_US_Cancellations.htm
However , just like the other class that I encountered , there is one problem that you folks need to aware: These ship's information are not the only one.
Which means that for example , some ship laid down date may have two.
There are more information about that in internet and outside but I don't know whose writing are more reliable so I'd leave that to those who eager to clarify those mess. -- Comrade John (talk) 19:37, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes that I made 

message: The table lists it as commissioned in 1950.  But the page for that specific ship says it was commissioned in July 1945 and recommissioned in 1950. SadTromboneSounds (talk) 17:51, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency in commissioning date for several ships including Bairoko
Talk:Physignathus

message: I have a water dragon and his head is turning white. WHY? He has also had problems with his back legs.
Sounds Like calcium defficiency be sure to have uvb light and calcium powder and gut load your crickets
it wont turn white if its a calcium defficiency....calcium defficiency will cause lumps or growths under the skin.. might be why his legs are not right but not why his head is turning white...
Check your humidity is not too high and causing body rot.
I would also seek vetrinary care immediately
Can i get confirmation on the sexing of the species. I always knew the red belly and chest to indicate a male. But recently had been argued that "pink/red" can also form on females, and that sexing should be done by isolating swollen glands or lumps under the tail. Similar to sexing more land based dragons.
                               A.H.D.L  —Preceding unsigned comment added by A.H.D.L (talk • contribs) 14:19, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to the article Australian water dragon the species lesueurii is no longer included in Physignathus which should be addressed overleaf...! --Gretarsson (talk) 14:08, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article content is outdated
Talk:Steve MacLean (astronaut)

message: He is called Steve MacLean from many sources including his CSA page. Name change?
--Neo63 (talk) 00:49, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Category talk:LGBT artists

message: Removed Marcel Duchamp - no evidence at all that I know of.
The following artists of the Steiglitz circle need adding, when pages for them are created: Charles Dumuth and Marsden Hartley.
*It seems like the case for Marcel Duchamp entry would probably based on his alter-ego, Rrose Selavy.  I will add the category for Charles Demuth and Marsden Hartley --Larrybob 20:39, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed and to be added
Talk:Shane Cooper (artist)

message: This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Shane Cooper.  The consensus was to keep it.  dbenbenn | talk 02:16, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Top (technical analysis)

message: Is this topic so significant that it requires a dedicated article. It can be elaborated in a small paragraph under technical analysis article-- YN Desai  Discuss 09:40, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Need for a dedicated article

message: Better put this article in some meaningful category, in addition to the stubs cateogry. That way it will be easier to find by other people. Oleg Alexandrov 02:47, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't mind you explaining what a top is. And I don't know what a good category for it is. You should know better, that's your speciality :) Oleg Alexandrov 18:56, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories
Talk:Sergius of Radonezh

message: Sergius may be revered amongst some Byzantine or Eastern Catholics.  He is not, however, revered in the Roman Church.  Neither of his feast days occurs either in the General Roman Calendar or in the Roman Martyrology.  Just because you can point to some site purporting to show "Catholic" saints means little.  Please, correct this!  Mwidunn (talk) 14:40, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Sergius is listed in the 2004 version of the Roman Martyrology."Honoring Eastern Orthodox Saints | EWTN".  Retrieved 2021-07-31. CosmicLycanroc (talk) 21:25, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a Roman Catholic saint

message: Could Saint Sergius be referring to Sergii Radonezhsky?
:No way. Mikkalai 03:22, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Sergii

message: I think the english translation of his original name would be "Bartholomew". -- Sy / (talk) 03:13, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Pierre Curie is not known in English academic work as "Peter"; however, most Enlgish-language works refer to the subject of this page as "Sergius of Radonezh". MishaPan 15:12, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: The icon of Sergius of Radonezh is inverted left to right... note 1) the text of the manuscript he is holding, 2) the direction of the lower cross bar of the crosses on his robes, and the use of the "left" hand to make the sign the blessing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.132.28.80 (talk) 15:52, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sergius of Radonezh image orientation correction
Talk:John Hubbard (Maine politician)

message: This article is copied word for word from here: http://history.rays-place.com/governors/me/hubbard-j.htm.  Should it be deleted?  --Smooth Henry 03:15, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC)
:No, the original source is from 1893, and therefore in the public domain.  However, it ought to be credited in the article, which I will do. --Russ Blau (talk) 14:52, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:POV check

message: "In order to ensure the POV check template cannot be used to brand articles as non-neutral without a justification, it may be removed by anyone if they feel that the issue has been resolved."  What about situations where a single editor has done a large rewrite and when someone nominates the effectively new version to be checked for neutrality, the same editor who did the large rewrite removes the template?  Obviously, if the editor produced a non-NPOV article in the first place, their removal of the template doesn't give much indication that NPOV has now been satisfied. -- Antaeus Feldspar 21:59, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case, add the neutrality dispute template and procedure; that's what they are there for. --DragonHawk 04:34, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "may be removed by anyone"? 

message: This page says, "Pages that include any of , , or the deprecated  templates are automatically listed under ." But that's not true. The category doesn't exist,  doesn't categorize tagged articles there, and  doesn't categorize its articles at all. Whoever's interested in maintaining this system for tagging POV problems (i.e., someone watching this page, for example) should correct these problems. - dcljr (talk) 06:09, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information is not correct
Talk:Austin Stories

message: Has anyone ever figured out why the show was cancelled? 
oh yeah, and were can I get bootlegs?
*MTV, you are so stupid to cancel this and 3 South.  And, no, I don't know where to get any episodes. -Zimbabweed 04:57, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * Yo! MTV Laughs!
* Laura House
* Austin Stories Chapter Ends
:to use with this article.--J.D. (talk) 14:59, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles
Talk:Alien vs. Predator (arcade game)

message: The "overheat" audio sample does not really exist. It is a mash of two audio samples, which, when the word "Overheat" is presented onscreen, tricks the brain like an illusion. It is known as the McGurk effect, allowing the game to still work without actually having an audio sample for the 'overheat' action. 2A00:23C5:F089:FB00:1547:66F0:FCED:C783 (talk) 20:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing Sample

message: U.S.A. Uzi - Ю, и 213.191.162.192 (talk) 11:30, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ViesDat 

message: The bio of the character says he's a cyborg  and the Capcom fandom wiki says that as well.. 108.208.137.170 (talk) 01:52, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Dutch Schaefer