lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hussein bin Ali, King of Hejaz

message: His son, Abdullah I was then Emir (not King) of Transjordan.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.173.208.60 (talk) 18:12, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

message: In the article, it is mentioned that he is buried in Jerusalem.  On the summary, it says Royal Mausoleum in Baghdad. Which is it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.229.63.9 (talk) 14:21, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burial place? 

message: This section was removed as out of context, apparently in arabic. would need links or an explanation, otherwise perhaps this can be an external linkMercurywoodrose (talk) 07:01, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Lineage

message: The third reference source is Royal Ark but it states that Hussein was born in Mecca and his mother's name was Salha. Andres (talk) 21:57, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Abdullah I ibn Hussein ibn Ali writes in his memoirs that his father's grandmother (i.e., Ali's mother) was Salihah bint Gharam. Royal Ark incorrectly identifies Salihah as Ali's wife. --Axiom292 (talk) 03:27, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Royal Ark

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved - Consensus that this specific person should be known by their highest title.(non-admin closure)  FOARP (talk) 09:03, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hussein bin Ali, Sharif of Mecca →  – The kingship was the highest position he held and would therefore appear to be the proper title. Векочел (talk) 01:39, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 December 2021
Talk:USS Constellation (1854)

message: "After the war, Constellation saw various duties such as carrying famine relief stores to Ireland and carrying American works of art to the Paris Exposition of 1895."
- I can't find any reference to an 1895 Paris Exposition.  Any fact checking for this? dml 04:13, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I recently watched a PBS "documentary" on Constellation and her 1859-1861 service with the US African Squadron. The show consistently showed her rigged as a barque while her current rig, and that shown in all the pictures of her I could find, is that of a full-rigged ship. Howard Chapelle in "A History of the American Sailing Navy states "No bark was employed in the sailing Navy in America" with one exception (not Constellation. I suspect the discrepancy is due to an error in the documentary but I thought I would bring it up here in case anyone had any evidence that Constellation was barque-rigged during her African service. OldVato (talk) 00:00, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rig 

message: A sloop of war refers to ships generally smaller than the USS Constellation, which is a ship nearly the size of a frigate, and a ship pierced for 22-24 guns is more accurately a corvette. The term should be replaced on the page.MKleid (talk) 07:10, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: All sources I have seen refer to this ship as a sloop-of-war. If you have sources that say specifically otherwise, please cite them. 192.91.171.36 (talk) 00:45, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corvette 

message: I believe the mention of going to the Paris Exposition is exclusive of DANFS. Confusing the names Constitution and Constellation happens a lot; even to me. In the extensive research I did for Constitution, there is no mention of Constellation escorting Constitution to Paris. Constitution most certainly made the trip but DANFS is the only source that says Constellation went there. I believe DANFS is mistaken. Hope this makes sense. Brad (talk) 20:43, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paris Exposition 1878 

message: Why was this done with no discussion?  I tried to revert but cannot.  Can an administrator fix this? GenQuest "Talk to Me" 10:14, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Parsecboy (talk) 11:38, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Undiscussed move to USS Constellation (1855)
Talk:Chinese yo-yo

message: There needs to be a page about the paper kind of chinese yoyos to avoid confusion. 
Paper yoyos are awesome. yup they are. i know lots of tricks now. That was random.
-------
Yes, I too think the discussion of paper yo-yos should be moved to it's own page (rather than being at the bottom of this page).
------
The Paper yo-yo now has its own page. Please help me get some info on it so that it's no longer a stub. Zhonghua88 (talk) 16:14, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Paper yoyos

message: The article says the Chinese yo-yo is thousands of years old.  I need to find out a time frame for when it actually started.  Anyone know?
12.77.81.10 02:07, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Age

message: shouldn't the fact that the chinese yo-yo makes a high pitch drone when accelarated be included somewhere? hence the odd name in chinese  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.119.157 (talk) 00:15, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sound

message: See discussion here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Toys#Merge_Chinese_yo-yo_and_Diabolo.3F. MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:38, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged. Hyacinth (talk) 23:18, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Diabolo]]
Talk:Mutagen

message: this is the most attention seeking topic needed in this article. And am asking for people to make a rough draft in which i will fill in the details. this is the first time i am writing an article and would appreciate some wiki expert to drop a general outline according to their standards. i believe this topic is what 80% of the article and it requires major attention. other required fields are their applications, may be reference to auxotrophs, cancer(or carcinogenic to be more specific), precautions in handling, any laws pertaining it, food and mutagens, etc.
hope this article finds some attention.
Vishal 05:54, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification and Mechanism of various types of mutagens. 

message: Do we really need to cite the fact that directors in the 80's and 90's over used the radiation thing in the movies? How many cheap films needs to be cited? Not that I agree with it. You only need to look at Street Fighter or Spiderman to prove other wise.Tourskin 23:45, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed?? 

message: Just wanted to announce the creation of a new Toxicology Task Force under WikiProject Medicine. Feel free to come and sign up. Thanks -- Jrtayloriv (talk) 04:06, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Toxicology Task Force

message: Is there a Hazard symbol or a Pictogram for mutagen? There are the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals or the Biohazard or the Radioactive symbols. I think I may have seen one once, a helix with an arrow pointing towards it or something. Anybody? Echinacin35 (talk) 09:35, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't remember ever seeing one that's specific for mutagen.  Mutagen is usually indicated using the generic toxic chemical sign with a skull and crossbones, or this one for health hazard which would include mutagens, carcinogens, teratogens, chemicals that cause respiratory sensitisation, etc., or possibly the biohazard sign when it's a virus.  It is possible that a different country might have one that's specific for mutagen, but probably not one that's used globally. Hzh (talk) 10:20, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symbol / Pictogram / Hazard symbol 

message: Under “DNA reactive chemicals”, PAH, standing for polycyclic aromatic compounds, is used. The acronym is explained further down in the article, but I find it more proper, and less confusing, to add the acronym anyways if it’s the first usage in the article. I had to look up what it meant, and I don’t believe PAH is a widely known acronym.
Is this a proper potential edit? UsersLikeYou (talk) 20:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable acronym usage
Talk:Amazing Facts

message: In the Mergers section, the part where Amazing Facts and 3abn were supposed to merge but didn't should be removed because i think nobody cares really. does anyone agree? Smartpotatoe (talk) 20:25, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  useless info 

message: I am not Adventist, for what it's worth, but I am still somewhat surprised that Joe Crews, who was the originator of this program and its was its presenter and primary force for about 30 years, doesn't have a wikipage of his own, while the current presenter, Doug Batchelor, does have his own page. I used to listen to Joe Crews years ago on the radio and watched his television show on a few occasions. As a non-Adventist Sabbatarian, I enjoyed his program for the most part. I've only watched Batchelor's show 2-3 times over the years. It seems to me that someone who is affiliated with Amazing Facts, out of respect for the originator of the program, would put together a wikipage for Mr. Crews. I came to Wikipedia to read about Mr. Crews after a conversation I had with someone recently, and there is very little about him in this article. He should have a dedicated page of his own.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.80.214.222 (talk) 03:43, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's the Wikipage on Joe Crews? 

message: I added a primary sources tag to this article.Catfurball (talk) 18:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Added tag
Talk:Aerobiz Supersonic

message: This game was also available for the Sega Genesis.
Is there a game similiar to Aerobiz Supersonic? --Timurberk 13:40, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: this is not in the game. civil war is an event, but it's very random and only seems to happen in Brazil as volcanic epution only seems to happen in NZ.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.77.10.72 (talk) 01:32, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peruvian Civil War 

message: Once I was playing with my friend in the fourth scenario (2000-2020) and in 2006 an event happened in São Paulo, an earthquake. I found this very strange because I never heard of the earthquake in Brazil or in whole Atlantic coast of South America A small detail that was not observed.
--201.73.186.34 (talk) 12:39, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Random Events
Template talk:Infobox province or territory of Canada

message: The "established" Parameter is set by default to confederation date and only confederation date. This removes the ability to add any additional information relating to establishment history. Nova Scotia and New Brunswick were established before confederation as colonies and joined confederation later on, and Newfoundland was a full dominion for a few decades before joining. Most of that type of information appears on pages for federal units outside of Canada, (example: The New South Wales page includes the date of establishment as a colony, date of achieving responsible government, and date of joining Australia). Considering the unique establishment history of each province, while they should obviously each include their confederation dates, there should be the possibility of using the "established" Parameter uniquely on each. WanukeX (talk) 18:41, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Dates different provinces joined Canada are different, and dates established also differ trackratte (talk) 22:06, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal - remove "established" parameter from template 

message: Greetings and felicitations.  The references for the fields "population_total" and "population_est" are preceded by a space, which violates MOS:CITEPUNCT.  Example from Quebec:
 Population (2021)
  • Total 8,501,833 [2]
  • Estimate (Q4 2022) 8,751,352 [3]
(This is the same type of bug as the one I posted in Template talk:Infobox drug#Template-protected edit request on 7 March 2023, so the same solution may apply, or at least help.) — DocWatson42 (talk) 05:21, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Moxy- 05:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. ^_^ — DocWatson42 (talk) 05:47, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bug in population total and estimate, and placement of their refs
Talk:Quantization (physics)

message: "field theory" is wtf, people.  It is best to use technicals immediately after fundamentals.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.242.110.218 (talk) 18:32, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs not to refer to "field theory" in beginning 

message: The word "quantization" is not the exclusive property of field theory. Planck's law enforced the quantization of energy. Bohr postulated the quantization of angular momentum...
--Ujm 08:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Application

message: A big problem with many of the Wiki scientific and technical articles including this one (and most college science texts---why the Dummies series of books are far more useful to the average student) is that they do not build from the simple to the complex starting from the level of someone with only the most rudimentary acquaintance with the subject-matter.  Relying solely on links for terms is insufficient, particularly when the term-defining links are themselves heavy in jargon and poorly written.  This makes the article virtually useless for the average Wiki user, and makes it more a tekkie blog. Tmangray 21:19, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This complaint should be moved to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics. This talk page is just for problems specific to this article on Quantization. JRSpriggs 08:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Include Simplicity

message: In the section "Geometric quantization", last paragraph, there are references to missing formulas. The text, in this form, is not understandable  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giorast (talk • contribs) 07:58, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing formulas 

message: The second sentence of this article is in parentheses (which is a problem in itself) and it references an "It". I can only see it referring to quantization itself, but that word doesn't make sense in that sentence. "Quantization is a procedure for constructing a quantum field theory starting from a classical field theory." Quantization is not a procedure, which makes this parenthetical statement confusing. What procedure could be used to construct a QFT from a CFT? Is it saying anything other than just name dropping QFT and CFT?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Babenzele (talk • contribs) 09:21, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I partially addressed your gripe, by marginalizing the field theoretical focus to one on plain QM, where the ordering ambiguities are more tractable. Indeed,  field quantization is largely a functor, where canonical quantization is concerned.  I left handles for non-canonical field quantization around, but the article is meant to be a traffic cop to searching readers, organizing and dispatching the various quantization strands involved. I move two paragraphs from Geometric to  Deformation quantization.Cuzkatzimhut (talk) 14:51, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is "It"?
Talk:David Hess

message: I think the statement that Hess wrote "All Shook Up" only to see the songwriting credit attributed to Elvis Presley is a bit questionable.  It wouldn't be unheard of for Elvis' manager to "hijack" the songwriting credits, but in the case of "All Shook Up" it appears almost universally acknowledged that Otis Blackwell wrote the song, with Elvis being given a token co-writing credit:
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=17:49539~2~T00A
Hess always claimed he wrote "all shook up" but the credits always say otis blackwell.  so who really wrote it??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mfbinc (talk • contribs) 03:53, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cite for "All Shook Up"?

message: This David Hess is not the actor who played Sweeney Todd on Broadway and currently touring with the play so I removed that information from the article. This is the correct David Hess:
http://us.imdb.com/name/nm2114978/
Survivor may05 (talk) 04:17, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sweeney Todd, the musical
Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Objections archive

message: Jguk's questions copied from the project page.
Am I right in saying that Version 1.0 is a hard copy (ie book) of Wikipedia articles? If so, would the book not need to use consistent formatting, words, style, etc. etc.? Does this mean some form of International English is to be imposed on certain articles, or am I mistaken? jguk 22:14, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Language style, etc.

message: Let me ask a fundamental question. Is a paper or CD-ROM version of Wikipedia anything anyone will actually want to buy/use? There are many good detailed encyclopaedias out there. Why would I want Wikipedia1.0 written in a mish-mash of eclectic styles instead of one of the already established fully researched and generally consistent tomes? For me, the answer would be no.
Wikipedia's advantage is in its breadth and instant adaptability. It is not known for its good writing and consistency of style. This is not a problem for a website: I look at the good bits and I try to improve the bad bits. I do not see how it would be possible to transfer the best bits from Wikipedia to hard copy form whilst not merely exaggerating the worst bits. (By the way, I don't want to be a party pooper, but I do wish to question, before you get carried away, as to whether this project is actually worthwhile.)
At the moment, we only have about 450 articles worthy of "featured" status, and about a dozen or so of those are "featured article removal candidates". It would be better if we worked up more.  On one point I do agree, it would be good if the main category headings such as "Culture" were properly worked up to featured status. May I suggest the project looks more towards making "featured articles" of these first? jguk 10:43, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Who would want to buy our beautiful roses?

message: The goal of this specific project is to collaborate essentially to find, screen, develop or maintain (or all of those) articles appropriate for a paper or "release" version of Wikipedia.
So far, our plan is to:
#Start at articles corresponding to top-level categories.
#Work through them alphabetically.
#Branch out from there. 
#List the articles we work on here, with their status.
For the people who are against a paper or "release" version: It's not even a given that such a thing will happen. But my intention is to work toward having a subset of articles that is worthy of such a thing. I cannot fathom how that can in any way be a bad thing to do.
For anyone with disagreement about the essence of this specific project: Wikipedians all  work on Wikipedia in their own way. The people who choose this way don't need justification. The people who choose another way don't need justification. I cannot understand any conflict between the two. Maurreen 11:41, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Blanket response to disagreement with essence of project
Talk:Belmont University

message: Bud Carpenter has begun repeatedly deleting well-sourced, pertinent information from this article with no discussion whatsoever. This is not acceptable and will be reverted until there is an attempt at an explanation. Persistent edit-warring without any attempt at discussion will likely lead to a block. ElKevbo (talk) 00:49, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undiscussed deletions of well-sourced, pertinent material
Talk:Strider 2 (1999 video game)

message: Hien is not featured in Strider 1, nor does he appear in the NES game. I edited that section to make it more accurate. ~Scion, LSCM webmaster, 21 Sept 2006
:Strider Hien at last merged to this section. Basara-kun 05:06, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strider Hien 
Talk:Matt Burch

message: This article is written in a barely disguised first-person tone and has no possible interest to others than family & friends of Mr. Burch.  This is a vanity article. -- 06:24, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Fancruft, more likely. [1] Feezo (Talk) 04:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote For Deletion
Talk:Andrew Welch (theatre producer)

message: For a January 2004 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Andrew Welch
----
===Vote for Deletion===
This article is written in a barely disguised first-person tone and has no possible interest to others than family & friends of Mr. Welch. All content besides spelling, grammar, and NPOV were submitted anonymously.  This is a vanity article submitted as cover for another vanity article. -- Cleduc 06:35, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a nickname by which he is commonly known, and which he uses on IRC and other such sites. David Arthur 17:31, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is written in a barely disguised first-person tone and has no possible interest to others than family & friends of Mr. Welch. All content besides spelling, grammar, and NPOV were submitted anonymously.  This is a vanity article submitted as cover for another vanity article. -- Cleduc 06:35, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a nickname by which he is commonly known, and which he uses on IRC and other such sites. David Arthur 17:31, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion
Talk:Tyndale Monument

message: This is an impressive tower and the views from the top are stunning. It gets very windy there so wrap up warm. If approaching from North Nibley, you cane either follow the track or there are a set of steps to take you up the side of the cut. These offer quick access but are a stiff climb.
If you approach from Wotten-under-Edge the whole walk takes about 2½ hours maximum.
Recently (winter 2004/2005) there has been some renovation of the surrounding iron fencing and the addition of floodlighting that allows the monument to be seen in all its glory at night.
--Charliem 06:55, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I will change the engraved text on the plaque from "greatful (incorrect spelling in the article)" to "grateful". If the plaque actually has the wrong spelling, then it should be changed back to "greatful". --Basawala 22:09, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: Please join our project to upgrade Gloucestershire-related articles to featured status.
 Mike |talk 16:39, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am descendent of William Tyndale witch change to Tyndall and my dad was named William Tyndall we have been haunted by the devil ever since the first born of the first born sees the devil I know it's mad but if i could send a pic of my dad he looks so like William Tyndale the nose the eyes are all the same 89.184.61.25 (talk) 23:23, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Help improve our long-awaited [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Gloucestershire|Wikiproject]]!
Talk:Dallas Mavericks

message: I evaluated this article, and think it is a informative and unbiased source for someone interested in the Dallas Mavericks! DoubleDub2021 (talk) 19:51, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cool Article! 

message: This is Edward Caughron and the system has been communicating via my mind for 3 plus years 174.255.128.198 (talk) 05:52, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crunch time Mr cuban 

message: Playing sports 2603:6081:9F0:8D10:99A5:4258:5CB4:402A (talk) 22:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Playing basketball 🏀 for the Gaston college rhinos