lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Economist Democracy Index

message: I've always learnt that Mexico is North America, but in this article it's listed as Latin America. 62.45.42.33 (talk) 15:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This article follows the criteria of the Economist Democracy Index. You may disagree with it, but it is not for the article to challenge it. Gorpik (talk) 19:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mexico is North America tmk 

message: In the last table of the page: "Components Year 2023", column "Changes in score" 
in the line for the country "Chile" the quantity seems right (0.24) but the arrow UP seems wrong,
because
according to the previous table Chile's score went DOWN from 8.22 (in 2022) to 7.98 (in 2023) 2804:14C:60:9811:B68D:B8B5:4F72:C88F (talk) 17:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch, I doubled checked the citation and the score indeed fell from 8.22 to 7.98. The arrow now shows that the score decreased, thanks. Jamedeus (talk) 21:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 May 2024 

message: Either I'm horribly misreading the legend, or the legend is reversed for the map. The western countries are colored blue which, according to the map legend, classifies them as hybrid/authoritarian regimes. However, the data in the tables in the article show that their scores put them into the flawed/full democracy margin. Those tables are also correctly color-coded to the legend, as in North America's table entries are yellow which corresponds to the map legend's classification of yellow.
I think the legend corresponds to the color-coding of the tables in the article (or vice versa), but the map's colors are reversed. Either the legend + table colors should be changed to reflect the map, or the map changed to reflect the legend. 2001:48F8:7052:EBB:C882:123B:66DE:393 (talk) 22:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean? The colour scheme is the same throughout the article, map included. And the map legend reflects that correctly. Gorpik (talk) 16:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. I had an extension installed that for some reason exactly inverted the colors in the article. 2001:48F8:7052:EBB:4C2D:51DA:5460:F9A4 (talk) 20:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect map legend 

message: The article should be protected again.
[Edit=Require administrator access] (indefinite) [Move=Require administrator access] (indefinite) 94.31.84.138 (talk) 13:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing how there was one vandal edit shortly after the previous protection expired and nothing since, I think indefinite pending changes would probably be a good idea. The article's edit frequency is generally low. 2603:8001:8F40:5C:7407:64A:46AD:C2F0 (talk) 06:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  article protection
Talk:Kalarrytes

message: What does this Aromanian claim stand for?
I see there is a political interest in the addition and use of this specific term.
The user who added this info has contributed no more than that
and his profile possibly justifies some biased motives.
Apart from that there is no arguiing with sources.
I see no reason for such speculation of political interest to exist in WP.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeonCR (talk • contribs) 01:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Aromanian village?
Talk:Kalpaki

message: Kushstrim's latest edits is just another typical example of wp:spa activity. This edit [] is completely unsourced, only by saying wp:nc without a single explanation it's like saying nothing. After a closer look on the specific users history log someone can conclude that the 'wp:nc' is a favorite summary he uses on several edits (another favorite summary is 'rv vandalism'). Unless there is some real argument on this addition I see no reason why this should stay here.Alexikoua (talk) 17:08, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Numis cite SCWPM

message: Could someone please add the 1990, 6th edition of Vol. 1 of the SCWPM? It's ISBN no. is 0-87341-149-8. I've just got it out of the library.Dove1950 17:03, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: assuming title and such is the same as 1994, it's done. Let me know if it's not right. Ingrid 18:02, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I fear you may have misunderstood me as 1990.s doesn't seem to work. Vol 1 is the Specialized Issues volume.Dove1950 21:47, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry about that. I wasn't paying attention. It should be fixed now. Ingrid 22:46, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: How can I add new editions to the template, please?  Adel.M.Radwan (talk) 08:36, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 2 

message: As of the time of this comment, the text
 * 
produces
 * Cuhaj, George S. (editor) (2006). Standard Catalog of World Paper Money: Specialized Issues (10th ed.). Krause Publications. ISBN 0-89689-161-5. : |author1= has generic name (help)
I'm not familiar enough with the template to fix this issue, but editors should have their own field, not be lumped in with "authors" or "others." Snowman304|talk 04:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editors showing up as authors
Talk:Trick at Mecone

message: It seems superfluous, given the Prometheus entry. Ifnkovhg (talk) 17:44, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I've redirected it. EALacey (talk) 18:00, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not how AFD works. Changes undone. Oreo Priest talk 18:50, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The article was redirected, not deleted. And it's the right decision, too. --Akhilleus (talk) 20:03, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this article necessary?
Talk:Geneva Public Transport

message: It's not clear what the purpose of the table of line numbers is - a simple list of route numbers with corresponding colour codes doesn't seem to be suitable material for an encyclopedia. More likely is that this was a work in progress, intended to be updated with an indication of where the various lines run. In this case, the previous bullet list presentation is more appropriate.
Either way, the list was out of date even before the 9 December 2008 changes came into effect - for example, the 18 bus service was renumbered as 23 a year ago (and will presumably in due course become the next tram service number, similar to the 14).
Bradype (talk) 12:08, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The TPG Network 

message: * http://www.tpg.ch/fr/telechargements/pdf/GuideCartBonus-GB-web.pdf
WhisperToMe (talk) 04:27, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  English documents
Talk:J. & E. Riggin (schooner)

message: The image of the vessel on this page is of the Schooner Ladona before she was painted. A clear distinction between the Ladona and the Riggin is evident due to the cabin structure in the image on the page. It does not match the Riggin. The current captain of the Riggin confirmed this and asked me if there was a way to get the image updated on Wikipedia. I want to make sure the community understands my intent. I have a photo taken during a recent sailing trip that I am willing to use. Please advise if I need to coordinate this with anyone or if I can go ahead with the edit. Thanks! Kbahrami (talk) 06:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Picture of Vessel
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Oklahoma/Tulsa

message: The proposals on the existing page are several years old. In an attempt to revitalize activity on this project, perhaps we need to revise the list of proposed pages. The table below lists some topics that could be addressed. Bruin2 (talk) 17:17, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 2011 Project Proposal

message: Content from Avey's Coliseum page have been merged with the Tulsa Coliseum page. Avey's Coliseum page has been marked for deletion to eliminate this overlap. I have also removed the link between Avey's Coliseum and the Oklahoma/Tulsa project page. Bruin2 (talk) 19:28, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tulsa Coliseum page

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter, which is within the scope of this WikiProject.  This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 07:11, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at [[Wikipedia:Content assessment]]
Talk:Plains Art Museum

message: I'm new at this and was trying to add a Wiki for Plains Art Museum. I received some warnings about blatant advertising so I tried changing the wording to be more factual rather than sounding opinionated. I'm not sure what more to do to make it factual.
-jesse —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plainsartmuseum (talk • contribs) 21:58, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please use four tildes (~) to sign your comments.  That said, the problem with the article is that it appears as an advert (specifically, the article stresses the features and numbers of particular functions and objects) rather than assert the notability of the museum.  Those figures are ok but only when supplemented (or rather, as a supplement to) referenced information that asserts the notability of the article.  DoomsDay349 22:08, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New at this

message: I would like to add some information about the current building itself since this is a notable aspect of the Museum. I would also like to add some information about the Rolling Plains Art Gallery, since it is a unique Outreach arm of the Museum (even though it is not currently in service). Any thoughts or objections?Bamboo15219 (talk) 02:16, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested Additions
Talk:Tymphe

message: As you can see here the following proposals were made after the 2nd assessment of the article:
    * The introduction is a bit short and maybe should mention the significance of the area to the chamois deer population.
    * Overall the article is well cited for B class although the first paragraph of the Geography sections needs references
    * I would move the "Access" section higher up maybe after Etymology or Geography.
    * The Climbing and Ascent route sections should be combined, although you could probably make Climbing a sub-section of Ascent routes.
I have done the last two edits but the first two require more work. If anyone else working on the article sees this, please try to take into account the directions mentioned above and improve the relevant sections. 
Kkostagiannis (talk) 19:14, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do list towards GA 
Talk:Liberty Bell Classic

message: Were any UK athletes really present? The government might not have wanted them to go to Moscow, but the GB+NI team did attend the Moscow Olympics.2.29.112.10 (talk) 23:50, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team GB 
Talk:Flow stress

message: This article has been classified as a Chemistry article, but in general flow stress is used in Mechanical Engineering applications such as rolling, that require plastic deformation. Flow stress is determined by mechanical tests and calculations, and used in designing mechanical operations. With this in mind, could someone change the classification? I don't know how to change it, but hopefully I have given enough info to help whoever does. Howboutpete 22:08, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemistry Article?
Talk:Oaxaca cheese

message: The cheese task force wants to rename this article to Oaxaca (cheese), which is misleading because the term "cheese" has become a defacto part of the name of this food.  This food is never known simply as Oaxaca in either english or the spanish equivalent and WP:COMMONNAME can be argued here in exempting this food from standardization.
Furthermore, there are instances in which we don't standardize names based upon what they are, due to the fact that their identifier has become part of the name ie: Swiss cheese isn't titled Swiss (cheese) or Superman as Super (man) or Italian sausage as Italian (sausage) or even Cuban espresso as Cuban (espresso).  Please see the following discussion for more information.  Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Food_and_drink/Cheeses_task_force#Misreading_the_MoS_-_Parentheses_in_article_names
--nsaum75 ¡שיחת! 07:34, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think its only referred to that outside of Oaxaca.  Here in Oaxaca I've never seen it sold as anything else other than "Quesillo"... --nsaum75¡שיחת!‎ 02:50, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are both right in that it's Queso Oaxaqueño outside of the state of Oaxaca and Quesillo within. I have never seen Queso Oaxaca however. Can one say Oaxaqueñan cheese in English instead of Oaxaca cheese? (like Swiss, not Switzerland, cheese)  --ElisabethS (talk) 03:28, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change

message: Two pieces of background -
# The article states: "Outside Mexico, Oaxaca cheese is often confused with asadero (queso asadero), a cheese produced in the northern state of Chihuahua." 
# Currently, all references to asadero cheese on Wikipedia link back to Oaxaca cheese.
Given these two pieces of information: either statement #1 is true and asadero cheese is a distinct foodstuff which needs its own page, or statement #2 is a proper connection and the oaxaca cheese article needs to be updated to reflect that the two cheeses are the same in all but name.
--OneDollarWilliam (talk) 23:25, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queso asadero
Talk:SO postcode area

message: Does anyone know the reason we moved away from the single digit postcodes in this area? For example, SO3 became SO18. Dan Kerins 22:10, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007 post

message: The text says specifically that there is no "SO1" postal area, and yet the map clearly shows one between SO40, SO43 and SO51.  Which is correct? Gavinatkinson (talk) 18:07, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: SO1?

message: I would hesitate to say that SO9 was NOT used for a time for new developments when codes within SO1 and SO2 ran out, but when I first lived in Southampton in 1980 SO9 was used as the first half of the codes for all 'large users' within the SO1 and SO2 areas, regardless of location. I was not aware of the SO9 code being used as a geographical code.Ntmr (talk) 20:18, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: SO9?
Talk:Watergate Babies

message: Is that a lot of new senators etc?  Please tell us something that would give us an idea of the scale of the change.
IceDragon64 20:40, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are a total of 100 senators.  In each election cycle, one-third of them (33 or 34) are up for re-election.  There are a total of 435 representatives.  In each election cycle, all 435 of them are up for re-election.  Thus, as the article states (with my editorial additions here in bold): "In November 1974, Democrats picked up 49 seats (out of 435 seats) in the House and 5 seats (out of 33 seats) in the Senate."  For the House: 5 out of 33 = 15 percent.  For the Senate, 49 out of 435 = 11 percent.  That gives some context to what these numbers mean and to the scale of the change.  In a nutshell, yes, it is a very significant change.  Immediately after Watergate, public sentiment was against the Republicans and for the Democrats (as a "statement" against the Republican Nixon and his administration and his party and its corruption).    Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 16:54, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scale of change
Category talk:Transgender and medicine

message: *TRANSGENDER-specific Health
*diseases for which being transgender is a risk factor
*transgender as a factor contributing to health disparities (underserved community)
*physicians who identify as transgender
*physicians whose practice is primarily within T community
*medical associations the membership of which T is a major factor
*medical associations that have a policy regarding transgender
*therapies & medical treatments which are meant to address transgender
*history of medicine with regards to transgender
**HIV/AIDS
**discrimination based on T within medical community
**discrimination based on T at medical schools
**changes in curriculum related to Transgender at medical schools / teaching T specific care
That's roughly what I'm thinking this is about . . . now what should it be called?  OsteopathicFreak 22:12, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What this is about
Talk:El Hadj M'Hamed El Anka

message: In the photo, I'm 90+% sure that the instrument is not a mandolin (as in the caption) or an oud (as in the photo description). It's way bigger than a mandolin, and unlike an oud has a flat back, mechanical tuners, and frets. I submit instead it's a mandole (an article I just started and added the pic to). Anyone object to changing the caption/description to reflect this? MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:06, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mislabeling of photo? 
Talk:Khaled Habib

message: This page seems very similar to the IMDb page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Khaled_Habib&action=edit§ion=new, e.g.:
*He composes and performs a genre of music which is both traditional and modern
*Khaled Habib El-Kebich composes and performs a genre of music which is both traditional and modern.
and word for word:
*He has developed a personal musical mix in which he blends different musical styles as well as music from all over the world and creates an exciting and unique musical style which is both innovative and captivating. 
*He has developed a personal musical mix in which he blends different musical styles as well as music from all over the world and creates an exciting and unique musical style which is both innovative and captivating.
The IMDB article was contributed by 'Crossingmoods Productions' and much of the content here is from wikipedian [User:Crossingmoods]]. Does that imply that copyright has been voided, or do we have a potential copyright breach?
Icarusgeek (talk) 09:26, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Similarity to IMDb article
Talk:Warrens Bakery

message: Reads like an advert.Serpren (talk) 01:42, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It did, so I've rewritten the stub based on published sources. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:43, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Advert

message: Cornwall's oldest commercial bakery dating back to 1860, as well as being the oldest pasty producer in the world, winning awards for its products. It is a premium producer, known for its artisan products, including savouries, scones, heritage biscuits, saffron cake, specialty breads, muffins, cakes, sweet treats and other award winning products. The business operates two production bakeries and over 50 stores throughout the West Country, being the largest pasty retailer in the world. It also supplies many well known UK retailers through its trade arm, 'Simply Cornish'. The companies team of Skilled Bakers claims to "pride themselves on creativity and innovation". Based in St Just, on the Land's End Peninsula, it lies within a World heritage Site, at the centre of Arthurian England. The producer and retailer, adhere to BRC and best practice on all fronts. However, through the Warrens family, the business retains an ongoing link to the past. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warrens Bakery (talk • contribs) 12:27, 30 November 2015‎ (UTC)
:I am unsure what the point of this comment is, Warrens Bakery. Is is a suggested addition to the article text? Cordless Larry (talk) 13:03, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warrens Bakery
Talk:Ruslan and Ludmila (film)

message: This article should be titled Ruslan and Ludmila according to WP:NC(F) ("Use the title ... under which it has been released in cinemas or on video in the English-speaking world").  Note the title on the RUSCICO DVD cover.  I'll make the move assuming there are no objections. Gr8white (talk) 17:21, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Propose move -> Ruslan and Ludmila
Talk:Izzy Hoyland

message: Is Izzy Hoyland (as opposed to the actress Natalie Bassingthwaighte) really only 30 in the series? I thought her allegedly "young" age was just a running joke, i.e. she lies about her age (along with other things) - Max Hoyland is in his early 40s, and I presumed Izzy was meant to be just a few years younger than that. 217.155.20.163 22:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *Living on Izzy Street - JuneGloom  Talk 20:20, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire

message: Brent D. Shaw, The Myth of the Neronian Persecution, is cited when calling the setion in Annals authentic, when in reality he wrote "There is no objective contemporary evidence that would definitely indicate an attack on Christians by Nero, either in connection with the Great Fire or otherwise.".  Richard Carrier is cited to lead the reader to believe that he also affirms the authenticity, when actually Carrier says " It is here argued that their arguments can be met with no strong rebuttal, and therefore the key sentence in Tacitus referring to Christ should be considered suspect."
This is extremly suspect and poor standard for wikipedia.Atanar (talk) 18:56, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Atanar Where is that? The only reference to him that I see is under Neronian persecution saying: . Jenhawk777 (talk) 05:08, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:   I have corrected the error and eliminated references to Carrier (he is WP:FRINGE). Brent Shaw does not argue against the authenticity of the text, but states that Tacitus is historically unreliable. This argument has not won acceptance among scholars, AFAIK.--Karma1998 (talk) 21:49, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Karma1998 Well done. Thank you. Jenhawk777 (talk) 05:20, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parts of "Neronian persecution" are misrepresenting the actual quoted sources 

message: So where are we now with this article. Is it in good shape? Are there unresolved issues? Laurel Lodged (talk) 14:11, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: In the section Persecution from AD 49 to 250, there are references to Ed RICHARDSON: "Ed Richardson explains..."   The book cited lists 2 editors, Karl P. Donfried & Peter Richardson. SedesGobhani (talk) 15:04, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taking the pulse 

message: An excellent scholarly article on this question: https://donaldrobertson.name/2017/01/13/did-marcus-aurelius-persecute-the-christians/ 2403:580B:879A:0:F9A7:79E3:4A56:E747 (talk) 18:55, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did Marcus Aurelius persecute Christianity? 

message: but then i read further and it seems like sporadic is the wrong word.... Oliverz144 (talk) 16:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the Beginning it says sporadically