Talk:Ivan Cankar

message: The article said:
:His hometown Vrhnika (20km from Ljubljana) boast a museum dedicated to him. Next to France Prešeren, Ivan Cankar is the most famous poet of Slovenia.
Although Cankar published collection of poems Erotika (Erotics), I don't think he's as famous for poetry as other Slovene poets (Simon Gregorčič, Anton Aškerc, Dragotin Kette, Oton Župančič, to name a few). So I rephrased this to "... the most famous writer of Slovenia." --romanm (talk) 16:17, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cankar as a poet 

message: I don't know how relevant this is so I am writing it here, but cankar is actually pronounced as tsankar (or is there a more spelling?). I find it quite disturbing to hear him refered to as kankar. Neikius 13:07, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  the pronouncication (cankar) 

message: There are some basic issues here, so I'm failing this article's Good Article review.  I note also that the nominator has not contributed to the article, so I suspect that there's not too much point writing up a detailed commentary.  However, for the record, among the issues that need attention are the fact that there is no lead, and that the references use "op cit" and "ibid."  But it would be very nice were this to be brought up to GA status, so I'd encourage anyone who is knowledgeable on the topic to contribute.  --jbmurray (talk|contribs) 09:12, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Failing GA

message: I think calling Cankar "an Austro-Hungarian writer" is inappropriate. He identified exclusively as Slovene. In his famous speech "Yugoslavs and Slovenes", he said "Austria should be left to drown in its own shit" (which he admitted at the trial). Besides, he acvocated the creation of a Yugoslav federation and died as a citizen of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. Furthermore, he was never "claimed" by the Austrians and his cultural legacy was limited to the Slovene-speaking lands. Viator slovenicus (talk) 14:05, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Slovene refers to his ethnicity, Austro-Hungarian to his nationality. According to WP:MOSBIO, nationality (not ethnicity) is one of the things that the opening paragraph should provide. His political views and self-identification don't change anything. Of course, you're free to explain them in the 'Biography' section (or persuade people to change the guideline for that matter). --Eleassar my talk 14:35, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slovene vs. Austro-Hungarian writer 

message: On November 12, 2010 I (202.209.111.133) corrected the mistake about Cankar's father emigration to the United States. It was immediately reverted. Kos 1983, p. 230 is cited as a reference, but I checked Kos 1983, 1989, and 2002, and there is no information about Cankar's father emigration to the United States. On the contrary, on many Slovenian web pages, including the Slovene Wikipedia page about Ivan Cankar, it is written that his father emigrated to Bosnia. My request is that the false information about Cankar's father emigration to the United States on the English page is removed and stays removed. Thank you.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.209.111.133 (talk) 23:51, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cankar's father

message: In the biography it is written that Cankar went to the University of Vienna to study engineering. I do not think that the UoV ever had an engineering department. There has always been a Technische Hochschule, sort of an institue of tenchology. That may not matter much, but these inaccuracies are still irritating. 
best, GPW  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gpwagner (talk • contribs) 16:45, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cankar's studies 

message: He seriously never used any agnostic themes and motives in any of his work or in his speeches. That he was agnostic is a specific view present only in post war communist critics.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.142.187.163 (talk) 18:06, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cankar as Agnostic? 

message: I assumed this was a typo for "moved to engage literature" or perhaps "moved to engage in literature", i.e. that he switched from writing poetry to writing prose instead. If "engaged literature" is correct, could it be wikilinked or clarified in some way? There's a section about the term "engaged literature" here, but the dates are wrong - Cankar's move to "engaged literature" predates Jean-Paul Sartre. -- John of Reading (talk) 12:36, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this must be what the editor (User:Viator slovenicus) who contributed the material probably had in mind: "intellectuals as well as the ordinary citizens must take a stand, especially in regard to major political conflicts". I'll leave him a notice to clarify this. --Eleassar my talk 12:47, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

text: Hey! Does this sound weird in English? It might be a calque from French, "littérature engagée"; what I meant was socially & politically committed literature. I'm not sure what would be the proper English term. Viator slovenicus (talk) 14:01, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "moved to engaged literature"