Talk:Meg: A Novel of Deep Terror

message: ==Untitled==
I removed the line saying the film is in production. It is still in re-writes and has not even begun pre-production.
== Criticism ==
"Despite the fact that the USS Nautilus (SSN577) is permanently based in Groton, Ct. as a museum and is incapable of use as a submarine, the vessel plays a minor role in the story."
Riiiight, and that just ruined it for you, did it? How about this:
Despite the fact that C. Megaladon is extinct, the author uses it as the basis for his book.
You do know it's called FICTION for a reason, right? Do you watch Star Trek and get all hung up about the fact that they're going faster than light or that there are aliens who look pretty much like humans but with bumpy foreheads? If so you must lead a very frustrating life.
To this end, I am REMOVING the criticism section. If your life is so terribly incomplete without it, revert the edit, but I stand by it. Literary criticism requires a real critique of the story, not just of arbitrary bits which don't reflect reality. Bwanderson (talk) 04:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NOT 'in production'

message: "Despite the fact that the USS Nautilus (SSN577) is permanently based in Groton, Ct. as a museum and is incapable of use as a submarine, the vessel plays a minor role in the story."
Riiiight, and that just ruined it for you, did it? How about this:
Despite the fact that C. Megaladon is extinct, the author uses it as the basis for his book.
You do know it's called FICTION for a reason, right? Do you watch Star Trek and get all hung up about the fact that they're going faster than light or that there are aliens who look pretty much like humans but with bumpy foreheads? If so you must lead a very frustrating life.
To this end, I am REMOVING the criticism section. If your life is so terribly incomplete without it, revert the edit, but I stand by it. Literary criticism requires a real critique of the story, not just of arbitrary bits which don't reflect reality. Bwanderson (talk) 04:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: ... not "Meg: A Novel of Deep Terror" - is it so hard to differ title and tagline? --84.44.179.39 (talk) 14:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The title is Meg... 

message: There was misinformation and speculation posted in this entry under "Film" and I found the proper source and edited the small sentence slightly to refer the accurate information. Obviously, nobody caught this error so I did some searching and corrected the information along with the source to the website/article reporting the information. 2001:558:6007:98:446C:DE4E:E835:F496 (talk) 03:30, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Under "Film": Clarification and Source Added 

message: Substituted at 23:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Meg: A Novel of Deep Terror. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081031140521/http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/12422 to http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/12422
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:21, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)