lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hotta Masayoshi

message: I stumbled across this interesting link, but it's not quite developed enough for inclusion in the article -- not yet.
* Selected comments from Harris's recolletion of his side of a conversation with Bakufu Grand Councillor Hotta Masayoshi on December 12, 1857
The web page identifies a reference source: "Foreign Relations of the U.S., Series 1902, 1879."  The "Foreign Relations Series" comprises collections of official papers relating to United States foreign relations, including diplomatic correspondence both to and from foreign governments and their representatives and to and from U.S. representatives abroad. The series is more fully described here.  In my view, this potentially illuminating excerpt needs to be placed in a better context.  My guess would be that a little more needs to be done by checking this index:
* Hasse, Adelaide R. Index to United States documents relating to foreign affairs, 1828-1861. Washington, DC: Carnegie Inst., 1914-21. 3v.
I suppose this further research could be incorporated into a number of other related articles, e.g., Townsend Harris, Foreign Relations of Japan, Ii Naosuke, etc.? --Ooperhoofd (talk) 18:17, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Harris/Hotta 1857
Talk:Richard Zeeman

message: I've rated this as a B class article, because I don't think there's much left to do.  (On the other hand, if anyone can think of anything, go for it.)  A few things that would be helpful might include:
* An illustration - unless there's one available on one of the early covers, this might have to wait until Richard appears in the comic book.
* At some point when the articles are fairly stable, maybe we should think about a navigation box.
TheronJ 13:31, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm reassessing as C-class because it has very few references. LadyofShalott 01:20, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: To do
Talk:Hōjō Ujiyasu

message: I was looking up who lead the battle of Kawagoe and found two candidates: Hojo Tsunashige (son in law of Hojo Ujiyasu, see Hōjō Ujiyasu) and Hojo Tsunanari (adopted brother of Hojo Ujiyasu, see Hōjō Tsunanari). The sources I found on google are not in unison about this. Samurai archives gives both options Tsunashige and Tsunari.  I see several options:
*One of them was present and the other was not
*They were both present and one was the actual leader
 
Also there might be a mix up in naming. I found one source where Hojo Tsunanari (brother) is called Hojo Tsunashige (brother), but it is def the same person (see ). Possibly Tsunari is also known as Tsunashige , or maybe the kanji can be read like this? This might have caused a mix up. 
Does anyone know more about this? Who really lead the battle of Kawagoe? 
I posted this question on several related article talkpages. Please post all replies at Talk:Battle of Kawagoe.
In case of no reply, for the moment, when I translate articles into dutch, I will assume that Tsunari lead the attack, that some sources call him Tsunashige, and that Tsunashige was present but did not lead the defense. Kind regards, Taketa (talk) 12:44, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tsunashige
Talk:Hōjō Sōun

message: It would be helpful to have some maps of the [later] Hojo territories within the larger context of Japan and the reigning shogunate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.18.21.207 (talk) 08:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hojo Geography 

message: If the 21 Precepts are genuine they ought to be added to the main article. However, I could only find a wide range of (contradictory) translations and not a single reliable source. Can anyone name a source that meets Wikipedia's standards? 
Robinandroid (talk) 21:12, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for 21 Precepts ? 

message: So, there's conflicting information on the article on when he actually became Hojo Soun. The penultimate paragraph states that he took it after taking Horigoe Castle following Ashikaga Masatomo's death, but the final one states that Hojo Ujitsuna changed the clan and Soun's name after Soun's death. I don't think there should be any issue with keeping both if the actual course of events is unclear, which it probably is, but they're both presented as fact - which can't be the case, as they contradict each other. --Samborup (talk) 18:16, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Fujiwara no Sumitomo

message: A large chunk of the text has been directly copied and/or lightly paraphrased from Karl Friday's book Hired Swords (page 149), stemming, it appears, from this edit of January 11, 2012 by .  You can go to the book's Google Books page to confirm. --Calton | Talk 07:31, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violations 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Hired Swords: The Rise of Private Warrior Power in Early Japan by Karl Friday, published 1996. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:03, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The Japanese version of this article says that Taira no Masakado and Fujiwara no Sumitomo never knew each other and that rumors of collusion among them was just hearsay, with the fact that both of their rebellions occurred around the same time being a coincidence (although both revolts are collectively referred to as the 承平天慶の乱). The section 逸話 covers the topic. The initial page which got me interested in the topic also states this under the "平将門（たいらのまさかど）の乱" heading, although I assume it's not up to citation standards. Given that this article directly ties the two rebellions together and states that Fujiwara no Sumitomo directly supported Masakado's rebellion, if anyone gets back to this page in the future it would seem worthwhile to check this information's authenticity. 2600:6C40:4700:DE4:22:4E85:6E59:5ECB (talk) 23:42, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claims of collusion with Taira no Masakado
Talk:Refuse-derived fuel

message: --Alex 13:35, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

message: References are needed for the following paragraphs, they appear to refer to incineration not RDF.
"The first full-scale waste-to-energy facility was the Arnold O. Chantland Resource Recovery Plat built in 1975 located in Ames, Iowa. Today there are nearly 100 similar plants in the United States."
Alex 09:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References needed
Talk:Mobile country code (MCC)

message: Now Montenegro is independant from Serbia and Montenegro, do the seperate contries have their own MCCs?
:Maybe, but according to , not yet. Montenegro has not yet been allocated any new country codes (incl. ISO, ccTLD, etc.) so far, AFAIK. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 22:54, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Montenegro

message: Shouldn't this be in the 'GSM Standard' category?  MNC is there but no MCC Kenny D 23:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 

message: The result was keep separate from Mobile Network Code. -- Debate 木 09:32, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Against merge. Mathiastck (talk) 20:37, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with Mobile Network Code - the case against 

message: It really does not belong, and is duplicated info of what is listed in the MCC article, which is an invitation to trouble in future maintenance. Here is the deleted section:
ICO Global Communications (link)901 01
Sense Communications (link)901 02
Iridium Satellite LLC901 03 
Globalstar901 04 
Thuraya RMSS Network (link)901 05 
Thuraya Satellite Telecommunications Company901 06
Ellipso (link)901 07 
GSM unsubscribed (see note)901 08 
Tele1 Europe901 09 
Asia Cellular Satellite (link)901 10 
Inmarsat Ltd.901 11 
Maritime Communications Partner AS (link)901 12 
Global Networks, Inc. (link)901 13 
AeroMobile (ArInc/Telenor) (link)901 14 
SITA (OnAir) (link)901 15 
Jasper Systems, Inc.901 16 
Jersey Telecom (link)901 17 
Cingular Wireless WMS (link)901 18 
Vodafone Malta Maritime901 19 
. -- Egil (talk) 19:14, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove detailled 901 list 

message: It appears AT&T (from reports "on the ground" there - I'm in Seattle) and T-Mo (based on the URL below) are using MCC==310 (==US) like is done for Guam.  Is that correct?  If so, should we update the "Puerto Rico" entry to be 310?
http://www.cellmapper.net/map.php?MCC=310&MNC=260&LAC=48813,48814,48816,48822,48898,48922
CharlieArcuri (talk) 01:21, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Puerto Rico
Talk:Date clan

message: Timon Screech mentions these two in a minor note:
*Date Muneyoshi (d.1751), daimyo
*Date Shigemura, daimyo successor to Muneyoshi
I noticed these names when I was looking at what Screech had to say about Hayashi Shihei (1738-1793). Shihei was a Sendai samurai who visited Nagasaki in 1777 and 1782. Shihei was also the brother of a concubine of Date Muneyoshi (d. 1751), the former daimyo whose successor was Date Shigemura in this time frame.<ref.>Screech, Timon. (2006). Secret Memoirs of the Shoguns: Isaac Titsingh and Japan, 1779-1822, p. 23.</ref>  This passing reference is a bit too tenuous, but there you have it -- a snippet. --Ooperhoofd 08:41, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 18th century clan
Talk:Erik Laxmann

message: Here is a possible Swedish source for this article: Wilhelm Lagus. Erik Laxman: hans lefnad, resor, forskningar och brefvexling. Helsingfors, 1880. --Bothnia 22:14, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A source
Talk:Moabit

message: what about the prison? Adam 13:42, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Have renamed both the Westhafen Channel and the Berlin-Spandau Navigation Channel.
Man-made channels are called "canals" and are reflected in their name, they are not "channels". See the Elbe-Lübeck Canal, the Rhine-Main-Danube Canal and size has nothing to do with it. After all, they are called Kanal in German anyway. Dieter Simon 15:49, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Canals 
Talk:List of post towns in the United Kingdom

message: Radstock (BA3) isn't in this list, but the Radstock page considers it to be a post town.  Anyone?  (This from )
:Good catch.  Next time, you're welcome to fix it yourself.  Noisy | Talk 14:32, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Radstock

message: There seems to be an odd situation around Bootle - it has its own post town, but is entirely surrounded by Liverpool post town, which includes Crosby, Aintree, Maghull, Waterloo, Litherland, Kirkdale, Walton, Fazakerley...but not Bootle! Are there any other odd cases like this? — sjorford++ 17:16, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hove is surrounded by Brighton post town, see . 91.85.32.166 (talk) 20:06, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Sandringham and Hunstanton are surrounded by Kings Lynn post town, see  82.153.101.160 (talk) 12:00, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: North Walsham is surrounded by the Norwich post town, . As you can see, Bootle is not really an "odd case", it's very common to have a post town surrounded by another one. 109.176.195.171 (talk) 08:13, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bootle? 

message: The above page is just this page but better and more readable. I have proposed a merge. 91.85.32.166 (talk) 20:04, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: See Talk:List of postcode districts in the United Kingdom#Merger proposal for discussion. — Richardguk (talk) 23:20, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of postcode districts in the United Kingdom]] 

message: — Richardguk (talk) 08:37, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related categories proposed for deletion 
Talk:Azai clan

message: Please do not change this article's content or title to "Azai" without some sort of naming vote. "Asai" is the more common currect pronunciation for "浅井". Though many history books use Azai, many others use Asai; neither can therefore be said to be more correct. LordAmeth 11:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Can we get some more clarifications on the naming? The Japanese wikipedia only lists あざい as a reading. I just think we need some agreement, because Asai Nagamasa and other articles use both readings. Douggers (talk) 12:36, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hrm. The books I've used, primarily those by Sansom and Turnbull, have consistently used only the Asai spelling. I unfortunately do not know the origins of the name in more detail... as Alex K indicates below, there's some differentiation to be made between Asai and Azai lands in different provinces, a detail I know nothing about. I do know that 浅 is read as asa in the clan/family name 浅野 (Asano), and that outside of this Asai/Azai clan issue, I have never seen it read as aza. But, in the end, I don't know from any definitive Japanese primary source or anything like that... LordAmeth (talk) 22:43, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't been able to find any sources, either, but I think "Azai" is the more correct reading in this case. There is a town in Shiga Prefecture (home of the 浅井氏) that uses "Azai" as a reading (Nishiazai, Shiga, [Homepage]). Additionally, the jawiki uses "Azai" for the clan name and all members. The reading "Asai" seems to be more modern (ja:浅井健一 and 株式会社浅井). Douggers (talk) 01:26, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright. Sounds good to me. LordAmeth (talk) 11:31, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Asai/Azai
Talk:Hotbed

message: --Alex 13:43, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 01:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: ==Untitled==
"Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and if this article cannot be expanded beyond a dictionary definition, it should be tagged for deletion."
If we tag it for deletion, then we hav to put wiktionary:hotbed into :category:composting on wikipedia. Is there syntax for that?
: No. Wictionary entries can't physically be designated as category members. T`he software only reads category tags on Wikipedia, not across projects.  Wiktionary is another project.  However, you could supply a link on the category page.  The Transhumanist   02:49, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why tag it for deletion? 

message: "Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and if this article cannot be expanded beyond a dictionary definition, it should be tagged for deletion."
If we tag it for deletion, then we hav to put wiktionary:hotbed into :category:composting on wikipedia. Is there syntax for that?
: No. Wictionary entries can't physically be designated as category members. T`he software only reads category tags on Wikipedia, not across projects.  Wiktionary is another project.  However, you could supply a link on the category page.  The Transhumanist   02:49, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Leaf mold

message: New to trying to edit wiki pages, but this page claims oxygen is essential for decomposition into leaf mold. However, many other sources claim creating leaf mold is an anaerobic process (i.e. without oxygen). Which is ACTUALLY correct? I've seen many claims on both sides. 
Furthermore, I've seen a lot of contention on what humus and humic acid actually are and whether or not it is actually possible to create it through leaf mold or whether this is misinformation. ````  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.65.91.200 (talk) 14:52, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: [This] ref from the Royal Horticultural Society clearly indicates that aeration is important (see under "Problems"). Anaerobic conditions in a leaf pile tend to produce stinking brown slimy mud in my experience but I haven't got a source for that. Old leaf mould (> 5 years) is as close to 100% humus as you can get. Humic acid on the other hand tends to be a component of anaerobic acid bog drainage - the colouring matter of the tea coloured rivers of upland temperate moorland, but I guess might also be a significant constituent of anaerobic leaf decomposition.   Velella  Velella Talk   15:38, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Tabasaran language

message: If you are a native speaker of Tabasaran then you can help translate this template into your own language:
 To the template
--Amazonien (talk) 03:17, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tabasaran language template
Talk:Anthony Wayne

message: There are several publications listing Anthony Wayne as a direct ancestor of Bruce Wayne. In some cases as an uncle or less direct, yet still an ancestor. It's also an FAQ on social media. Perhaps someone can create a Depictions or modern culture category? Loftwtr (talk) 16:43, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's under the "List of memorials to Anthony Wayne" article. I found it by mistake, would it make sense to add a small Cultural depictions (or popular) subtab or standalone article? Lincontrain (talk) 15:59, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Mad Anthony' and Batman

message: In the Death and Legacy section, there's an entire paragraph devoted to the 3rd U.S. Infantry Regiment (The Old Guard), and Wayne is only casually mentioned once.  Does this info really belong in this article? Canute (talk) 14:53, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with this, it seems like an outlier when compared to other bios on wiki. Some of the content on the entire article also seems redundant. Lincontrain (talk) 15:52, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed irrelevant details and moved one line to legion topic. It looks like this editor whomever that is, is referring to the 3rd U.S. Infantry Regiment (The Old Guard) article. Lincontrain (talk) 17:22, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd Infantry 

message: To add to this article: mention of Wayne's Congressional Gold Medal. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 02:00, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I added this to the summary section after Stony Point, the battle he earned the metal for. Lincontrain (talk) 18:10, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add to article 

message: Featured in Boardwalk Empire as wax statue in fictional town of Tabor Heights, New Jersey. Gyp Rosetti (3rd season main antagonist) admired General Wayne and later broke into Wayne display case to steal the general's hat to wear, further demonstrating Rosetti's obsession with power and bizarre demeanor. 2607:FB91:966:5467:EC38:93FF:FE93:4EE1 (talk) 23:30, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Popular Culture
Talk:George Clymer

message: "Clymer was born in Whiteville". Where is this? Wikipedia lists three places by that name, of which only the one in North Carolina could have existed at the time. Is that the one? -- Hux (talk) 03:02, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: FWIW, Clymer's congressional biography says he was born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. - Nunh-huh 03:05, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace 

message: Regarding this edit by User:SimplySage. I have no opinion one way or another, but when you write "it appears" then link to a primary source document, this is WP:Original research specifically WP:PRIMARY #2, 3 & 4.  If you can find a secondary source that is reliable that's different. This is an extraordinary claim that requires more support from secondary sources. Per WP:SECONDARY: "Wikipedia articles usually rely on material from reliable secondary sources. Articles may make an analytic, evaluative, interpretive, or synthetic claim only if that has been published by a reliable secondary source." In this case evaluation is required to determine if the primary source document is trustworthy, something a historian can evaluate by looking for corroborating or contrary evidence in other documents for example. -- GreenC 05:05, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slave owner
Talk:Nathaniel Tarn

message: I've worked on Nathaniel's page to clarify some footnotes and some stylistic problems. Trogon (talk) 18:24, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While much recent vandalism had already been reverted, some child's conversion of his name to Nathaniel Tard throughout had remained.  While fixing that, I took the opportunity also to expand some portions of the article, and to add an infobox.  However, it's clear that a bunch more work still needs done -- I imagine house style would prefer to remove or at least be much more selective of the lists of his works, for starters.  Alas, I am out of time. Erskiji (talk) 23:02, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 
Talk:Coaches Poll

message: Rated high since it is a promenient feature of CFB and likely to be linked from many articles. --MECU≈talk 16:03, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Brief little writeup on the history of the poll. http://philsteele.com/Misc%20Pages/phil'sweeklynote.html in the section "Top 25 Coaches' Poll."↔NMajdan•talk 02:40, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting little writeup on the poll 

message: USA Today, which owns the poll, refers to it as the Coaches' Poll (including the possessive apostrophe).  Any thoughts on correcting it here?  76.187.17.173 02:39, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that does seem like it would be a good move. (76.27.145.6 (talk) 01:53, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  On USA Today's own website, they refer to it as the Coaches' Poll.  Wikipedia ought to promote good grammar. (Even though I'm not sure if 'good grammar' is the correct way to say it. ha) I'll see if I can change the title while maintaining the links. CougRoyalty (talk) 22:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coaches' Poll or Coaches Poll? 

message: The first few sentences in the article seem to have been tampered with. I'm a newbie on Wikipedia so I'm not sure how to revert. Mathiusdragoon (talk) 02:59, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: There are, after all, significantly more than 59 Division I FBS coaches. 75.76.213.106 (talk) 00:37, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is it determined which coaches get to vote in the poll? 

message: Is the coaches' poll now sponsored by US LBM? 47.152.207.163 (talk) 00:59, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did it get renamed or add a sponsor?