Talk:Kra Isthmus

message: — Preceding unsigned comment added by OverMyHead (talk • contribs) 15:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: since 18 January. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map request 

message: Sounds like a reasonable merge to me. Go for it! //Big Adamsky 23:50, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I support this merge. Who wants to do it?Wisekwai 11:18, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I guess this is an ok merge — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.212.87.253 (talk) 16:19, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merge

message: The Kra Canal should be a separate article, like the Nicaragua Canal is. It makes up the bulk of this article, which is a bit weird for an article on the Isthmus. Further it is an important concept in shipping. It also has a long historical basis. Xxxxxxxxxxx 02:01, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Support. This is a related article but should have its own page as it referes to a geo-political impact. Perhaps a new page and  a link to the new page would suffice. Also maps are a must. --User:Yeokaiwei 17:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

text: *Support. As it is, it's sort of the "cart before the horse", so to speak. --MCB 01:29, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

text: *Support. Alternately, it could be moved to "Kra Canal". Mdotley 01:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

text: *Support - create Kra Canal page, move appropriate content and add a timeline of proposals. NevilleDNZ 00:49, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

text: *Support - split the canal-bit to new "Kra Canal"-article. The Isthmus should retain its own article, though, but it looks odd now, with most of the article about the canal. Geanixx 13:58, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

text: *Support - The canal article has potential for further expansion as more information becomes available. Plus, as Geanixx mentioned, it looks odd now since most of the article is actually discussing the canal rather than the Isthmus itself. If there are no objections, I'll initiate the move in 24 hours. The time now is 1639GMT. --Pavithran (talk) 16:39, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the old separate article was at Kra Canal (note the different capitalization). Maybe it'd be a better idea to reactivate that one, so it has the old editing history preserved at the most logical place. andy (talk) 18:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: split

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Kra Isthmus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130518011102/http://oxforddictionaries.com:80/definition/english/Kra%2C%2BIsthmus%2Bof to http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/Kra,%2BIsthmus%2Bof
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:07, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kra Isthmus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924121950/http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/Kra-Isthmus-of?q=Kra%2C+Isthmus+of to http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/Kra-Isthmus-of?q=Kra%2C+Isthmus+of
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:25, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:40, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion