lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Birthday (Association album)

message: This article does not indicate which chart(s) it is refering to. Neither in the two chart positions indicated after the singles mentioned, nor in the wikilink'ed Top 40 mention.Lilac Soul 09:15, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart information 

message: Hello, what happened to "The". see other albums. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:36, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: The removed
Talk:An Lushan

message: * what means « [...] Yang, however, persisted in his reports against Yang, [...] »
Maybe I'm currently tired (or too much French), so I will come back tomorrow to read it a 2nd time calmly, but I think the section An_Lushan#Rebellion have some odd unclear sentences (redaction). 220.135.4.212 (talk) 13:59, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear section 

message: Roxanna was not Sodighan, she was a Bactrian! also Roxana was an Avestan name borrowed into Sodighan and middle persian. I think that whole line should be removed from the article since it is completely irrelevant to An Lushan! Akmal94 (talk) 08:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please Edit! 

message: I do not find any source which translate the Chinese character La(剌) as "unthinking". La(剌) means "1. perverse; unreasonable" "2.to contradict; to violate" (based on https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E5%89%8C#Chinese) or "slash; contradict" ( based on https://zh.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E5%89%8C).I suggest the notation of meaning should be updated to "slash; contradict" or others.
 By the way, "unthinkable" might be not bad as a free translation of "剌". I guess the noter might had a typo. 240B:C020:481:1BA3:915A:E3B0:7AC6:1C44 (talk) 06:15, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  posthumous name of La (剌)
Talk:Anastasius II (emperor)

message: I removed the reference to the Heraclian Dynasty as the category page specifically states that this dynasty only lasted until 711, and this emperor reigned after 715.  Please provide additional information to justify Anastasios II's inclusion in this dynasty. Portia1780 (talk) 18:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Heraclian Dynasty

message: Is there a reason why the previous emperor is "Anastasius I" while this is "Anastasios II"? Tintero21 (talk) 17:08, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, I personally found myself having the same question. Emperors of the Twenty Years' Anarchy have rather inconsistently named pages. It appears to date back to a pretty old (and seemingly controversial) survey from 2006 or 2008, but I still started a discussion on it over at Talk:Philippikos Bardanes#Philippicus vs Philippikos after another user raised a similar question. I would like to invite you to partake, but obviously that's up to you. I would be interested in hearing your thoughts on the topic, though. Hope you're having a great day. LVDP01 (talk) 11:56, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anastasios or Anastasius 

message: — Assignment last updated by Dwlehm1 (talk) 00:31, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: The Middle Ages
Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Scouting articles by quality log

message: Why is Blackwell, Worcestershire appearing every day, changing from Stub --> Start, then Start --> Stub and so on. No edits to Talk:Blackwell, Worcestershire have been made. --Bduke  (Discussion) 04:13, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blackwell, Worcestershire 

message: is it time to unblock this page? --evrik (talk) 16:56, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi , unfortunately unprotecting this page won't do any good. The Bot that updates this page has been malfunctioning since September. The page can't be unprotected until this is fixed. See Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Index. Thanks, « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @  18:04, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Unblock
Talk:Diggers (2006 film)

message: Diggers was screened at the annual alumni film festival of The Collegiate School in April of 2007. It also received two thumbs up on the Ebert and Roeper program the last weekend of April. RahadyanS 03:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: miscellaneous
Talk:Beonna of East Anglia

message: To continue improving I would suggest an infobox, graphics of somesort, and a switch to footnotes to allow for verifying the info. With all that this could be nominated at WP:GAC. Aboutmovies 06:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: I propose that Hun of East Anglia be merged into Beonna of East Anglia. I think that the content in the Hun article can easily be explained in the context of Beonna, and the Beonna of East Anglia article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Hun of East Anglia will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Hel-hama (talk) 10:03, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Scott Tremaine

message: I'm really unhappy with the quality of the citations for Galactic Dynamics being cited 3000+ times.  I mean, they're alright, but I'd like something more authoritative and static.  If anyone else ever looks at this, please  advise. WilyD 15:08, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations of Galactic Dynamics
Talk:Alfred Radcliffe-Brown

message: Not one word about Daisy Bates?--89.160.136.166 (talk) 01:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I cant' see any reference and i was reading http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1301&dat=19280718&id=7IgQAAAAIBAJ&sjid=mZUDAAAAIBAJ&pg=4765,5442016 Which seems the be him discusing the problems that  Colonisation has causted in the pre existing communites which goes against 
"Radcliffe-Brown was often criticized for failing to consider the effect of historical changes in the societies he studied, in particular changes brought about by colonialism"
--81.105.151.4 (talk) 20:37, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the Criticisms right
Talk:Charibert of Laon

message: Being the grandfather of Charlemagne would make him Carolingian, no?  Is there another link to the older dynasty?  Thanks. DavidRF (talk) 21:30, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merovingian category? 

message: On http://familypedia.com, I found someone named Charibert(570-636), 7th grandfather of Robert of Hesbaye. And Charibert was born in the year 570. Could THIS Charibert be the Charibert in THIS article? (talk) 8:51, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible birthdate and relation to Robert of Hesbaye 

message: While I do not think the above deletion request is valid on copyright grounds, I have an editorial concern about this image. It seems that it was intended by its 19th century artist to represent Charles the Bald (see :File:Steuben - Charles the Bald.jpg) and not Charibert of Laon. While the artist obviously never saw either man, can anyone explain to me why this image claims to be illustrating Charibert of Laon? In other words, why the seemingly incorrect caption? IronGargoyle (talk) 19:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Image authenticity
Talk:Cathal mac Finguine

message: Archaic name for Munster  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rpyle731 (talk • contribs) 05:06, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mumu 

message: Having seen more studies since last looking at this article, I now believe it is biased and perhaps based on double standards. It should start that he was easily the most powerful king in Ireland in his time. Material that needs to go is the entire 2nd paragraph of the introduction, to which I contributed when I knew less about him. DinDraithou (talk) 09:26, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 
Talk:Ceolred of Mercia

message: :This article is pretty boring...71.66.230.44 (talk) 07:08, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I found something quite interesting in it; That Saint Boniface claims Ceolred spoke with demons and cursed the clergy of God at the end of his reign before death, could it be that he re-took his ancestors faith much like King Redbad of the Frisians? Woden was often times described as a demon and so were all the Anglo-Saxon divinities. This facet interests me much. 4.255.55.147 (talk) 22:16, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This section contains this line:-
"Ceolred was Æthelred's son, but his mother was not Osthryth, Æthelred's only recorded wife"
which contradicts:-
"Osthryth was probably the mother of Æthelred's son, Ceolred, king of Mercia from 709 to 716"
in the Wiki page on Osthryth:-
[]
The fact is that Ceolred's mother is unknown and both entries should reflect this, perhaps on this page to:-
"Ceolred was King Æthelred's son, but his mother may not have been not Osthryth, Æthelred's only recorded wife"
Dantes Warden (talk) 16:06, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestry and Reign
Talk:Childeric III

message: The "References" section begun in this format by User:Srnec years ago needs to be cleaned up to contemporary Wikipedia format... I am separating and moving the general sources to a bibliography, since some of the included items are not referenced in a useable way (since there are no page numbers or reference to what part of the article they refer to, but they do constitute a bibliography since apparently some contributors cited these texts for their article edits). Stevenmitchell (talk) 20:30, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References Section 

message: Brilliant. The second sentence of this article says that after someone deposed Pope Zachary then Pope Zachary crowned Pepin. So a deposed former Pope crowned Pepin. Is there a rule now that every article in Wikipedia has to have a dangling modifier if it doesn't have repeated instances of commas needlessly separating subjects of sentences from predicates? You folks are grammatical poison. Don't you have copy-editors whose job it is to smite authors committing such transgressions?69.86.130.90 (talk) 13:20, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please write in English 
Talk:Everything and More (Natalia album)

message: A cover for this album can be found on http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?release=2524958  — Preceding unsigned comment added by STrek77 (talk • contribs) 17:48, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Birdlime

message: Obviously, this is an unsourced and eccentrically written non-article. In particular, what is "providential" about the stickiness of birdlime, and what about that quality empowers it to be used metaphorically? The writer's vocabulary exceeds his or her understanding.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.118.229.114 (talk) 16:12, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basic Standards and Basic English 
Talk:Cuthbert of Canterbury

message: Is it really true to say that he is venerated in Eastern Orthodoxy? Johnbod 02:44, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venerated in... 

message: The person who wrote this is confused about ordination vs consecration.  A bishop is made a bishop (ordained) only one time.  Such an ordination is for life, even if the bishop subsequently resigns, moves, retires or whatever.  When a bishop moves from one diocese to another (changes his/her jurisdiction) they are said to be "translated".  When a bishop becomes an archbishop he/she is consecrated (anointed) into the position.  Archbishop is simpy an administrative post and nothing more; therefore the person does not get ordained again.  (Ex;  Archbisop of canterbury is primate of England but only bishop of th local diocese.  Archbishop being an administrative job and having no standing within the sacramental holy orders.)
An archbishop can resign and is no longer an archbishop. (It is not a permamnent thing vs bishop which is for life .. even if the person is not functioning as such.)
Consequently, the argument that the two people in the article, bishop and archbishop, could not have been the same is not valid.  A bishop being appointed as an archishop would indeed be "consecrated" as well as "installed" when assuming the job.  That same person would be consecrated again if he/she were to be appointed as archbishop of yet another place.
The original confusion was the difference between being "ordained" a bishop and subsequently "consecrated" as something else.  Once a bisop always a bishop, archbishops come and go, loosing authority along the way, but still remain a "bishop".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.35.219.194 (talk) 18:47, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consecration vs Ordination vs Translation
Talk:Caldwell High School (Idaho)

message: Victuallers 22:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Camas County High School

message: Victuallers 22:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ealdwulf of East Anglia

message: Much of the article appears to be a generally unsourced discussion of the history of a number of Anglo-Saxon kingdoms at around the time of Ealdwulf period as king of East Anglia. I intend to start moving what is unrelated to him out of the article, as I can't see why it should remain there. Hel-hama (talk) 06:57, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Reign
Talk:Ecgfrith of Mercia

message: Ecgfrith has been added to the infobox as King of Sussex; I don't think this is supportable by the sources and would like to hear other opinions. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 23:33, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the Handbook of British Chronology (3rd ed.) doesn't list Ecgfrith as a king of Kent nor as a king of Sussex or East Anglia. Nor does it list those titles under Ecgfrith's entry for Mercia. Mike Ashley's Mammoth Book of British Kings and Queens doesn't list Ecgfrith as a king of Kent, Sussex, or East Anglia. Morby's Wordsworth Handbook of Kings & Queens doesn't list Offa as king of Kent, Sussex, or East ANglia. Barbara Yorke in Kings and Kingdoms of Early Anglo-Saxon England doesn't list Ecgfrith as a king of Kent or East Anglia (she doesn't list kings of Sussex). Ealdgyth - Talk 01:05, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  King of Sussex?
Talk:Emperor Monmu

message: Re: explanatory spelling note in first paragraph, see discussion thread at Talk:Emperor Temmu#Tenmu versus Temmu. --Tenmei (talk) 15:59, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Monmu versus Mommu
Talk:Emperor Ruizong of Tang

message: I've added a disambig link to Li Dan (trader) (d. 1625), though it's a red link. If anyone is interested in creating an article for this figure, a former wokou and head of the Chinese communities and trading operations in Hirado and Nagasaki, it would be great. His name is written the same way (李旦). Thanks. LordAmeth 12:02, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Li Dan
Talk:Emperor Shōmu

message: Could more be added to this article about this emperor's relations with Tang China and emperor Xuanzong? 173.89.236.187 (talk) 17:03, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relations with Tang China 

message: Wasn't this emperor a musician? 76.189.141.37 (talk) 04:58, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Musician
Talk:Emperor Suzong of Tang

message: Suzong's mother was a consort surnamed Yang (given name unknown). As Consort she was known as Yang Guipin and was posthumously named Empress Yuanxian. However she must not be confused with another Consort surnamed Yang, Yang Guifei, (given name Yuhuan). Dcattell (talk) 21:03, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suzong's Mother  

message: At the end of the third paragraph under 'Reign', we find this statement: "To cement the alliance with Huige, Emperor Suzong also gave his daughter Princess Ningguo in marriage to Yaoluoge Moyanchuo."  How does this princess align with the list of named offspring found in the 'Family' section?  Another online source suggested that this was actually not 'princess ningguo', but rather 'the princess of Ningguo' [toponym].  Does anyone know for sure?  SpockvonDeutschland (talk) 23:45, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Princess Ningguo
Talk:Emperor Zhongzong of Tang

message: How can we clean up the into to the article? It seems like there’s something trying to be said but it’s all broken up and doesn’t make any sense.
Actually Iosa (talk) 06:50, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction of the article
Talk:Eógan mac Muiredaig

message: Chronica de Mailros records:
Anno DCC.xl.j [Obiit* Ewain rex Scottorum, cui fucceffit Murezaut filius ejus.]
Anno DCC.xliiij [Obiit" Murezaut rex Scottorum, cui fucceffit Ewen filius ejus.]
Anno DCC.xl.vij [Obiit' Ewen rex Scottorum ; cui fucceffit Hedabbus filius ejus.]
Anno DCC.lxxvij [Obiit Hed rex Scottorum, cui fucceffit Fergus filius ejus].
Anno DCC.lxxx [Obiit Fergus rex Scottorum, cui fucceffit Seluand filius ejus.]
Anno DCCC.iiij [obiit Seluad rex Scottorum, cui fucceffit Eokal vene nofus.]
Anno DCCC.xli [Obiit Dungal rex Scottorum, Alpinus filius Eokal ei fucceffit.]
Anno DCCC.xliij [Obiit Elpinus rex Scottorum, cui fucceffit Kined filius cjus.]
Anno DCCCC.viij [Eodem anno, periit Dofnaldus rex Scottorum.]
...
Translation:
In 742 Ewain King of Scots, died and was succeeded by his son Murezaut
In 744 Murezaut King of Scots, died and was succeeded by his son Ewen
In 747 Ewen King of Scots, died and was succeeded by his son Hed abbus
In 777 Hed King of Scots, died and was succeeded by his son, Fergus
In 780 Fergus King of Scots, died and was succeeded by his son Seluand
In 804 Seluad King of Scots, died and was succeeded by Eokal the poisonous
In 841 Dungal King of Scots, died and was succeeded by his son Alpinus
In 844 Elpinus King of Scots, died and was succeeded by his Kinedus
In 908 [same year, was lost Dofnaldus King of Scots.]
Seluad son of Fergus son of Hed son of Ewen son of Murezaut son of Ewain.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.1.235.114 (talk) 23:05, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronica de Mailros 

message: Hudson references the sons of Dungal mac Selbaich mac Eogain, as being Giric (d.889, Dundurn) and Causantin (d.c890, Leitters).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.1.235.114 (talk) 23:46, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hudson "Kings of Scotland"
Talk:Community School (Sun Valley, Idaho)

message: welcome Victuallers 22:17, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fazang

message: This content appeared on a previous incarnation of this article that was redirected to a more common name.  —Viriditas | Talk 23:03, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content to be merged 

message: The article casually mentions that in his early life, Fazang found solitude by engaging in self-immolation (which it describes as a Daoist practice). This has to be wrong because self-immolation, by definition, is always fatal.
I suspect the actual practice being referred to is probably either self-flagellation or some kind of fasting, not self-immolation. I’m guessing this article may have been translated from another language because there seem to be a lot of other idiosyncrasies like that (although none as blatant as this one). It definitely needs some attention. 2604:2D80:6984:3800:0:0:0:58A8 (talk) 23:06, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-immolation?
Talk:Council High School (Idaho)

message: welcome Victuallers 22:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Thanks to , who obviously put effort into building up this article.  However, I had to trim some of it because it was written with a promotional tone that does not belong in Wikipedia, such as the statement "Council truly is a great school with great students, teachers, and athletics."  School spirit is great, but I have to wonder whether Zzallcla13 might have some association with the school, and so be biased.
If you want to build up the article, that's great - just keep it factual, neutral and provide suitable references. --Gronk Oz (talk) 03:32, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for a Neutral Point of View 
Talk:Kimberly High School (Kimberly, Idaho)

message: Welcome Victuallers 22:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Here Where There Is Love

message: I suggest the page be moved to Here Where There is Love to reflect the title of the album as it appears on the cover (larger image of album cover).  Thoughts?  Strobilus 17:00, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the page. Strobilus 03:57, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to ''Here Where There is Love''
Talk:Grifo (noble)

message: Grifo was, however, granted 12 counties in Neustria by his brothers in 748, according to the page on Neustria.
134.243.212.23 (talk) 21:24, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Talk:Grifo (disambiguation). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 6#Talk:Grifo (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Certes (talk) 13:53, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Talk:Grifo (disambiguation)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Guo Ziyi

message: I edited the "Under Emperor Daizong and Tibetan Invasion" section for clarity and grammar. I think that other sections probably require such attention, but information from this section is the reason I came to this article. I cleaned up the sentence "Sun Tzu's idea of the cleanest kind of battle" as best as I could, but I left the phrase "Daizong appeared to him and stated, 'If the country had just use general earlier, this would never happen.' " alone, since I could not figure out what meaning it was trying to convey. (Captain Walker (talk) 06:47, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hunald I

message: I just noticed that @Srnec reverted my changes without any stated cause, I assume that there's some disagreement on their part when it comes to the spelling of the name of French king Pepin the Short (Pépin le Bref). The article says "Pippin" which I changed to "Pepin" as it is the name used on the main page, a change I felt was correct.
Seeing, however, that it was reverted, I think this topic might be worth bringing up. Should the spelling used on the main article be used or not? I think it is more correct to spell it "Pepin" as it is also closer to his actual name in French, but again, this seems to need some kind of arbitration. MeadeIndeed (talk) 22:49, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe both Pepin and Pippin are correct in English. They are both admissible variants in English. Therefore, they should not generally be changed except to enforce consistency within an article. He was not French in any case. Srnec (talk) 00:04, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pepin or Pippin
Talk:It's My Life – The Album

message: My copy of this album has the same tracks but in a different order, as does the version Amazon are selling. I've changed the page to reflect this, as I've only ever seen this version. Is there more than one version available?  Dom Kaos (talk) 21:43, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track order 
Talk:Izzy Stradlin and the Ju Ju Hounds (album)

message: The writing style of this Wikipedia page is against Wikipedia's policy on Primary (original) research in which the author has decided to write a review of the album without any valid secondary sources to back up or assert this opinion making it unacceptable for encyclopaedic purposes. Renegade MUFC 17:25, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing Style 

message: Wouldn't Izzy Stradlin and the JuJu hounds technically be a different act then Izzy Stradlin, despite being an Izzy-mobile?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.228.195.160 (talk) 19:54, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Own band?
Talk:Al-Khalil ibn Ahmad al-Farahidi

message: What is meant by 'the deepest letter in the Arabic language'? It makes no sense. Perhaps this could be rephrased. Kanjuzi (talk) 12:51, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed it to say "ayn" is the Arabic consonant that's pronounced the furthest back in the mouth, with a one-sentence explanation of why that has any relevance for the name of the book. 2604:3D09:A984:A600:25FE:FDE9:C373:F480 (talk) 04:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kitab al-'Ayn
Talk:Ma'mar ibn al-Muthanna

message: This article seems to need updating? Someone who speaks Arabic?
http://www.onlineislamicstore.com/b1964.html
ISBN:  0907461433
Author: Sara Saleem
Publisher: Ta-Ha Publishers Ltd. (UK)
Pages: 40 Binding: Paperback 
Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 22:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs updating?