Talk:Prime Minister of the Philippines

message: These are links to verify the validity of the info in this page. Pls refer to these before you make your revisions, since this could be controversial.
* Three Prime Ministers
* Laurel PM legally recognized
Also, Virata and Laurel had an overlap in February 25-26, 1986, because of the revolution going on, so there are no issues there because of the conflicting nature of de facto and de jure at that time. There was also a presidential overlap between Jose P. Laurel and the government in exile for years, not only a couple of days, during WW2. --Noypi380 17:58, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Gareon! :-) -Noypi380 08:57, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

message: The image :Image:Cesar EA Virata.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
The following images also have this problem:
*:      Image:Ph pres marcos.jpg
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --07:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Cesar EA Virata.jpg

message: This article currently asserts: "The President of the Council was also equivalent to a prime minister as he headed up the secretaries, or ministers that advised the President of the Republic.", citing  I used to have a copy of this book but I'm currently in the U.S. and I left that copy in the Philippines. Because of this, I don't currently have access to it. Would someone who has access to this book please be so kind as to quote here the relevant text whereby the office of Prime Minister of the Philippines was created by Aguinaldo? Thank you. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 08:21, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information re creation of the office of Prime Minister of the Philippines in 1899 

message: Having seen no discussion above, I have WP:BOLDly removed this section in this edit. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 10:16, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of the ''First creation (1899)'' section

message: INSERT: Please consider this section withdrawn. My error. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 09:09, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi there! Let me try to clarify. Are you proposing that there should be a separate article for "Presidente del Consejo de Gobierno", the post Mabini occupied? - Koakaulana (talk) 01:38, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. Thanks for responding. No. I see in article 73 here that the office of President of the Cabinet did exist in the Malolos government. I was uncomfortable with the support for the notion that this office was the de-facto equivalent of a Prime Minister office. I've taken a second (or third or fourth) look this morning at some of the material I had looked at previously, though, and I conclude that I need to do an Emily Litella on this whole idea and say "Never mind". I've been doing this in spare minutes alongside a lot of other things that I was paying more attention to, and I've apparently misread or misinterpreted things I had looked at previously. This looks like my major error here, and I apologize for causing all of this hubub. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 09:09, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prime Minister office assertions prior to 1978 appear problematic