lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Secret of the Rosary

message: I've removed the claim that the imprimatur given to this publication means that "the book has been approved by the Catholic Church."  No such approval is conveyed.  An Imprimatur added to the title page of a book simply means that the book has not made any claims counter to the teachings of the Catholic Church.  It is not an "approval" of the book, and claiming such approval suggests that the contents of the book are now somehow part of Catholic doctrine and/or now part of some official canon.  It is not.Malke 2010 (talk) 15:37, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misunderstanding regarding Imprimatur
Talk:Vox Piscis

message: Removed links:
http://www.georgebayntun.com/EBC14%20Catalogue/EBC14-13.htm returns no content
http://www.wilsonsalmanac.com/book_fish.html returns only adware unrelated to the content of the page
Rob Burbidge (talk) 23:45, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links broken
Talk:Auditorium (Community of Christ)

message: Since the Children's Peace Pavilion is located in the Auditorium (Community of Christ) and both pages are so small, perhaps they should be merged.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs)
:I was WP:Bold and did it, since no one seemed to care.  If any objections come up, I will revert the merge myself.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 13:38, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 
Talk:Holy Corner (Begijnhof Ghent)

message: I took this picture of what I believed is Groot Begijnhof Sint-Elisabeth according to openstreetmap  but I see this same gate and the church within that area on the Groot Begijnhof Sint-Amandsberg article. Which is it? Is the OSM data wrong? --Trougnouf (talk) 12:24, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion between Groot Begijnhof Sint-Amandsberg and Groot Begijnhof Sint-Elisabeth
Talk:Clergy house

message: I propose that Manse be merged into Clergy house. There doesn't seem to any great amount of information contained in the former which isn't already, or couldn't be, covered by the latter. The Clergy house article also seems to cover all other types/names of such dwellings (e.g. rectory, vicarage), with only Manse having a separate article. The Manse article doesn't, in my opinion, spell out precisely why it ought to be treated independently in this way. Grunners (talk) 11:38, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No strong feeling either way, leaning to keep as is. "Son of the manse" (most of the article) is a well-known phrase/cliché, where "son of the rectory" is not. Johnbod (talk) 13:50, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed article merger 

message: "Pastorium is the usual term in the Southern United States, especially among Baptists."
I'm a southerner, and a former Baptist - specifically, I was mostly a Southern Baptist when I was a Baptist.  I have never in my life heard the term "pastorium," but I've often heard "parsonage."  Indeed, I lived in a parsonage for about a year and a half on two different occasions, in East Tawakoni, TX and Rush Springs, OK.  In both cases the term wasn't pastorium, but parsonage.--Goffs California (talk) 20:10, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: A citation has been added. — SpikeToronto 07:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pastorium???
Talk:2007–08 Vanderbilt Commodores men's basketball team

message: A discussion regarding logo removal/inclusion that occurred during a recent edit to this article is ongoing at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#Logos on articles of past seasons.CrazyPaco (talk) 23:18, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: infobox comtemporary/historic logo requirement
Talk:Mark Sanchez (politician)

message: Sanchez' name says "THANK YOU" next to it in the opening paragraph. I don't think this is relevant, so I'm just gonna go ahead and delete it. StanHater (talk) 20:24, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "THANK YOU"? 
Talk:Shindand District

message: This article was improvidently moved by User:Anoshirawan at 06:00, 26 August 2007.  The former name of this district was Sabzwar.  The current name is officially Shindand. See, for example, the document on the official Afghan government webpage. "Herat Provincial Profile". --Bejnar (talk) 21:44, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I note that the above pdf file may not always be available, so try Google's HTML link. --Bejnar (talk) 21:50, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title is Shindand

message: Request for comments on which name is better usage:'
*Statement in favor of Shindand District:
:Shindand is the name used by the government of Afghanistan and the United Nations High Commission for Refugees.  Nancy Hatch Dupree says in Chapter 15 of her 1971 book An Historical Guide To Afghanistan  "the Green Place, which, now called Shindand (Pashto equivalent of Sabzwar)" so the name change is not recent. Shindand is the name currently used on US maps and by the US Geological Survey. --Bejnar (talk) 03:24, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly. All reliable sources use "Shindand", and that's how it should be on wikipedia as well. Raoulduke47 (talk) 18:38, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There doesn't seem any point leaving this any longer - it's pretty clear that all the evidence points to Shindand. --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 10:16, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: RFC whether Sabzwar or Shindand is the appropriate designation

message: *The Google search "Sabzwar site:gov.af" recovers 0 hits.
*The Google search "Shindand site:gov.af" recovers 17 hits.
*There appears to be no web usage of "Sabzwar" by the Afghan government. Does Anoshirawan have a citation of the use of the name "Sabzwar" by the Afghan government? --Bejnar (talk) 03:35, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Usage by Afghan gov

message: Editors have made unsubstantiated edits regarding the ethnic makeup of the district.
*Edits:
**edit by 61.5.146.126 on 30 April 2007 added "Pashtuns make up the majority of this district."
**edit by Anoshirawan on August 2007 changed this to "50% of the population is Tajik while the other 50% is Pashtun."
**request for citation for ethnic makeup was made at by Bejnar on 25 November 2007.
**no citation was provided, and the sentence was removed by Bejnar on  8 December 2007.
--Bejnar (talk) 21:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ethnic makeup of district
Talk:Miriam Pirazzini

message: 'Liner notes require: Author of notes (Copyright year). Title of section in liner notes. In Title of album (pp. x-y) [CD liner notes]. City of recording company: Name of recording company. Especially since these are the only reference given for the article. Voceditenore (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Referencing
Template talk:Dutch capital cities

message: It supports only 10 columns. User:Krator (t c) 21:56, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

message: It might be a good idea to add the provincial flags to the template and the national flag to the template header. If no one has any objections I will make these changes to the template. CRwikiCA (talk) 17:27, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I played around trying to implement it, but there was no visually pleasing way to do it. Including the flags messes up the overall lay-out and does not add anything to the template. So I decided not to include flags. CRwikiCA talk 18:21, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flags
Talk:Sukhoi Su-35BM

message: Should not be mentioned that with the 88kN dry-thrust of the 117S can reach supersonic without the use of the afterburner?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.118.191.48 (talk) 20:28, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be mentioned and it should also be mentioned on any article about super-cruise. But with a notation that this is not a final design / aircraft in service.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Senor Freebie (talk • contribs) 12:21, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supercruise 

message: there are more physical differences. sorry, i don't remember them all, but one important is: no airbrake! the airbrake is "emulated" by adjusting TVC and usual aerodynamic controls.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.225.76.224 (talk) 20:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Physical differences: add more 

message: I have a high resolution picture of the Su-35bm uncertain about the copyright of picture should i post???. if so please include a short description as how to post pictures. thanks in advance .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.171.168.66 (talk) 15:34, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: On this site is stated( http://www.knaapo.ru/eng/products/military/su-35.wbp )  that the rate of climb is 280m/s not 325m/s.
ok,i change it now!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.13.196.174 (talk) 18:20, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good.  Try to provide an edit summary and sign your post with 4 tildas (~~~~) in the future. Thanks. -Fnlayson (talk) 19:28, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rate of Climb 

message: There seems to be quite a bit of confusion about types of thrust vectoring and what each is called, probably because sources usually gloss over the feature with a phrase like "with thrust vectoring capability" and move on. 
2D vectored thrust is when the nozzle can move along one axis. This is called 2d because it allows the possible vectors of the thrust to trace out a 2-d shape. If the nozzle were rotated all the way around on one axis, it would trace out a plane; therefore it's called 2D.
Asymmetric vectored thrust points each nozzle slightly to the side, as opposed to along the roll axis of the plane. Used with thrust differential in a 2-engine plane, it achieves a 3D effect.
Newer su-35BM's are being built with 3D, or orbital, vectored thrust. The nozzles move along two axes - but that enables the vector to be moved in a 3D region. Thus it's called 3D.
The vectored thrust and the maneuverability it enables is one of the most unique features of su-35's, yet the article doesn't mention anything about cobra rolls, double backflips, cobra turns, accelerated half-loops, or other maneuvers that only OVT or 2D-asymmetric VT planes can perform. 67.171.193.143 (talk) 09:54, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thrust Vectoring
Talk:Delco Carousel

message: While it is true that the name of this system is a registered trademark, its primacy within the aviation industry over a significant period of time gave it few competitors and made it nearly the generic archetype of its kind.  For this reason, it is a notable milestone in the development of aeronautical navigation, which is why it is described here. Agateller (talk) 23:05, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:George J. Terwilliger III

message: I came across this article this morning and noted it probably does not meet wikipedia guidelines. I organized it chronologically as best as I could, given that the citations in the first paragraph are both dead links, and I'm unpaid and other responsibilities are calling. Basically, the article is ten years old, possibly with someone merely substituting "McGuire Woods" for "White and Case" in the initial paragraph.Jweaver28 (talk) 15:11, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work needed to transform from press release 
Talk:Clearwater Air Park

message: the Wiki article is poor in content. It should be enhaced with new information, links, images... There is only a breaf introduction.  it wolud be interesting adding something about the history of the park or the place where is located ( in general further infos).
 Team5DTMaddalena (talk) 16:27, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  the page should be improved
Talk:Channel Airways

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.thesoutheastecho.co.uk/Channel%20Airways.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  GraemeLeggett (talk) 23:27, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Bahrain Air

message: Hey do you think that the destinations section is getting too long and that it needs to split off. If so, comment here.--87.244.106.131 (talk) 19:46, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Destinations 
Category talk:Films set in the United States by state

message: I've made a category for each state that was missing one except Delaware -- couldn't find any movies set there. Some categories only have one artile for the moment, but now there are fairly consistent buckets to add more movie articles, so my hope is that they won't stay that way for long. Please start a Delaware category if you can think of any Delaware-set films. KConWiki (talk) 22:09, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:R v Cheshire

message: Does anyone know if there was a medical doctor that discussed whether or not the treatment of the victim and lack of diagnosis for the breathing problem was reasonable or ignorant? I've just read about this case, and I think the person treating the victim was at fault (proximate cause), because the healer had the responsibility to heal the individual. If despite the best efforts of the reasonable/average doctor the victim would have died, then I can perceive why the court held the defendant liable. Otherwise, wow, this seems like garbage by the court. It says the victim had already undergone surgery, so the chain of causation should have broke upon the act of surgery (healing). It appears the doctors didn't diagnose the respiratory problem, which was the cause of death rather than the stabbing (because that should have been taken care of already). The respiratory tube fitting was the independent variable and the dependent variable was the victim's breathing. Sure, yeah, duh. It was medical negligence that had a significant impact on the death of the victim. P>0.05. I'm surprised medical evidence hasn't been used to vacate this case already. --Cyberman (talk) 09:33, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Negligence of Medical Staff?
Talk:Mesoamerican ballcourt

message: What a delightfully historical semi-curiosity of a DYK. Kudos to those responsible. :-D
Peter Isotalo 17:45, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

message: There is a chart in this article that says that the court at Chichen Itza was 96 meters long. In the Chichen Itza article it is stated that it is 166 meters long (which is the number I found in the Britannica and elsewhere). It would be nice if anyone who is following this article would correct it. Thanks. --Nazroon (talk) 13:46, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Court at Chichen-Itza 

message: "More than 1,300 ballcourts have been identified, 60% in the last 20 years alone."
If Taladoire is the source for this info, that would be roughly since 1970, or 1970-1990. Peter Flass (talk) 20:58, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  date
Talk:Bion of Borysthenes

message: I've twice now had to revert edits from someone who keeps removing Bion and Hippo from :Category:Ancient Greeks accused or listed as atheists. Just to be clear on this issue, regardless of whether they were actually atheists (and its probably quite doubtful) both of these philosophers are specifically described in at least one ancient source as being atheists, so I assume it's a valid category for them to be in, and I don't understand why this anonymous person is trying to wage an edit war on this issue. Pasicles (talk) 17:46, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accused of atheism
Talk:Protobothrops mangshanensis

message: This species should be classified and listed as Zhaoermia mangshanensis - the validity of the genus Ermia (later substituted by Zhaoermia) has been demonstrated in a number of phylogenetic studies that have shown it to be only distantly related to Trimeresurus, and more closely related to Protobothrops and Triceratolepidophis. The genus Zhaoermia has been widely recognised in the recent literature, and the fact that this species does not belong with Trimeresurus is now entirely uncontentious.
Reference:
Malhotra, A. & R.S. Thorpe (2004) A phylogeny of four mitochondrial gene regions suggests a revised taxonomy for Asian pitvipers (Trimeresurus and Ovophis). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32: 83–100  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Caissaca (talk • contribs) 15:15, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fine, but the ITIS taxonomy, which we're currently using for all of these articles, still lists it as Trimeresurus mangshanensis. For a lengthier explanation, see my comments here. --Jwinius (talk) 18:18, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

text: This may not be the only viper species to spit venom either. Campbell & Lamar (2004) cite Mole (1924) who observed Bothrops asper to eject venom over a distance of at least 6 feet (1.8 m) in fine jets from the tips of its fangs. --Jwinius (talk) 15:37, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Zhaoermia mangshanensis''?
Talk:Protobothrops mucrosquamatus

message: Mention how the left and right sides of the spots along the back often do not exactly fit together. Jidanni (talk) 19:29, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: List of animals featuring external asymmetry Jidanni (talk) 11:04, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jogged spots 

message: This is not such a useful article.  The Taiwan Habu is highly venomous and highly aggressive.  I'd like to see something more about its behavior and how to avoid it. 60.250.123.228 (talk) 03:02, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs updating
Talk:HMS Royal Oak (1664)

message: A popular brand of charcoal in the United States is called 'Royal Oak.' Under the historical circumstances, this seems unlikely to be an accident. Should it be mentioned as a modern residual? The company logo sports a crown, possibly merely gemeric.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CF99:2080:7D33:44DF:3210:1BFD (talk) 22:57, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coincidence or intentional commercial use
Talk:919 Third Avenue

message: hi, i'm a new user/poster. i work in this building but have no commercial interest in the page/posting. i am an employee of one of the tenants.  just wanted to add an entry to wikipedia b/c there is some interesting history about the property that i learned in cluduing NYTimes articles on it that i intend to link.
Hi, I noticed you added it to the category of one of the tallest building, maybe to flesh it out add how tall it is and other facts. - Forteshadow (talk) 22:29, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:Sibilla Aleramo

message: Looks like the book list triggered the bot. Same list is in Italian Wikipedia article. Jokestress (talk) 22:28, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot

message: This article looks like it's low on citations and doesn't have a lot of info. Could it be classified as a stub article? Eatgreass (talk) 02:34, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs citations
Talk:Epaphras

message: * Are there any other early traditions about E.? It would be noteworthy if E. is only known from these 3 mentions in the Pauline Epistles.
* Is there any prosopographical research on the name? (It is an uncommon name; I haven't encountered it elsewhere.) It would also be noteworthy if the only example of this name was the person mentioned in the Pauline Epistles.
-- llywrch (talk) 22:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions
Talk:R v Hancock

message: WP:Good article usage is a survey of the language and style of Wikipedia editors in articles being reviewed for Good article nomination.  It will help make the experience of writing Good Articles as non-threatening and satisfying as possible if all the participating editors would take a moment to answer a few questions for us, in this section please.  The survey will end on April 30.
* Would you like any additional feedback on the writing style in this article?
* If you write a lot outside of Wikipedia, what kind of writing do you do?
* Is your writing style influenced by any particular WikiProject or other group on Wikipedia? 
At any point during this review, let us know if we recommend any edits, including markup, punctuation and language, that you feel don't fit with your writing style.  Thanks for your time. - Dan Dank55 (talk)(mistakes) 03:10, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survey
Talk:R v Smith (Thomas Joseph)

message: I have removed the parts added by this IP   as I'm pretty sure it's a copyvio probably of this source  (unfortunately you need to register to see it but a Google search should give a good idea). The phrasing strongly suggests a copyvio, even more so if you look at the first version. Further, while it can sometimes be difficult to be sure what direction the copying happened if it's been in our article for so long, the phrasing "Did S cause death of V" was in our article for very long but still seems to be in the above sauce. (Well it's possible coursehero is still a copyvio but of something else that isn't online anymore or isn't indexed.) Nil Einne (talk) 06:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio removed
Talk:Uyghur Latin alphabet

message: I doubt very much that the name of this article is useful to most readers of the Wikipedia. This should probably be merged within an article about Uighur writing systems in general, as it is a stub. -- Evertype·✆ 15:35, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of this article

message: This article is currently titled Uyghur Latin Yëziqi and it uses ë anywhere that the word Yëziqi occurs, but in all other instances, the /e/ phoneme is written with é. The main English source we have, An Introduction to LSU, states that é was chosen over ë, and an uncited note in this article says that ë was previously used prior to 2008, when it was changed to é. Unless we can produce clearly better sources in Uyghur or Chinese, I would think that An Introduction to LSU should govern. I found a blog post on Sinoglot which expresses confusion about the use of ë. I found a message-board thread (on a site which is blacklisted by Wikipedia, so look for it at your own risk) titled "Ë ni É dep alayli(Jawaplar)", which looks like it is discussing the ë vs. é issue, but it's in Uyghur, which I can't read.
The upshot is that, unless someone comes up with some other evidence, I will suggest a move back to Uyghur Latin Yéziqi.—Greg Pandatshang (talk) 19:27, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ë and é 
Talk:Royal Canadian Infantry Corps

message: There is no mention of 3 Mech Commando which was formed in the early seventies  as part of 4CMBG in Europe.  The Battalion motto was "Born in a storm" due to the huge rainstorm which occurred during the inauguration parade.  It's sister battalions were part of the Airborne Regiment in Petawawa.Omarvan (talk) 21:33, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 3 Mech Commando