lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sibylla, Queen of Jerusalem

message: In the article, someone wants to keep the entire sentence "Bernard Hamilton wrote "there is no real doubt, following the precedent of Melisende, that Sibylla, as the elder daughter of King Amalric, had the best claim to the throne; equally, there could be no doubt after the ceremony that Guy only held the crown matrimonial.". However, it is on the spot where clearly is an analysis of crowned Sibylla, and position of Guy. Thus, the argument should only deal there with the Guy position, i.e was it crown matrimonial or something bigger. I hope that no one mixes the question of Sibylla's personal right there, as it is a different argument and controversial, dealt elsewhere.
Because of these reasons, from that pot, I will remove the idea "Bernard Hamilton wrote "there is no real doubt, following the precedent of Melisende, that Sibylla, as the elder daughter of King Amalric, had the best claim to the throne", and leave only that part of citation that deals with crown matrimonial. 62.78.124.139 20:38, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  crown matrimonial - please avoid mixing two different arguments 

message: There should be an infobox for the article, seeing as most royals and nobles have one.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 13:32, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added one. Have juggled the images around to fit slightly. Hchc2009 (talk) 12:52, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the infobox makes this claim, in what sense was Agnes of Courtenay Sibylla's predecessor? Seems to me, unless we're being sexist about this, her predecessor was Baldwin V. Andrew Dalby 17:14, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Surtsicna (talk) 17:57, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:Secessionist movements of Canada

message: There is a Newfoundland secessionist movement.  While not too serious, it enjoyed quite a revival with the Atlantic Accord dispute in 2004 between Newfoundland & Labrador and Paul Martin.  Much of the movement has strong support on the Avalon Peninsula, the region where St. John's is.  Other than that, I'm not sure.  It would be a good idea to include it on this page.  Justin Bathurst.
:I added a small part about the secessionist movement but I think it needs to be expanded greatly Canking 00:22, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm not sure the "Red River Rebellion" was secessionist since it's not clear that it was part of Canada at the time.  Dan Carkner 16:02, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Louis Riel 

message: Well, this article deals with all kinds of independence movements by francophones and even anglophones who just feel Ottawa sucks. But aren't there any First Nation secession movements? Is there, for example, no group that seeks independence for Nunavut, or greater autonomy for the Crees? Steinbach (fka Caesarion) 16:15, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just wondering 

message: This article says Quebecians? Is that correct? Ehccheehcche (talk) 01:16, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  People from Quebec are called...? 

message: Listing the Rathnelly and Quebec "Kingdom" movements in a serious way harms the thesis of this article. They're jokes, publicity stunts, nothing serious about them. For this reason I put them into an "In popular culture" section. 23skidoo (talk) 20:07, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Humorous movements

message: I don;t have the book with me to do a proper citation, but in the book, it pretty much says the following statement on Nova Scotia:
In 1990, just before the failure of the Meech Lake Accord, then-premier John Buchanan predicted Nova Scotia would end up as part of the United States if the accord failed.[citation needed]
If anyone has the book in their posestion, and knows how to use wiki's cite system, please do so.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.77.10.72 (talk) 04:52, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The Collaspe of Canada?

message: Are there first nation, metis or inuit secessionist movements in Canada?--Kaiyr (talk) 13:17, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: first nation, metis or inuit

message: Were there movements for secession of Canada from the British empire while it was still a part of that? If so, shouldn't they be described here too? -- 78.50.189.155 (talk) 11:45, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about secession from the British Empire? 
Talk:MPICH

message: So, is MPICH2 thread safe?  Can I call send & recv from different threads?  Google only knows that in 2005, this was not the case (it was THREAD_FUNNELLD) but now that its 2012... linas (talk) 01:23, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  thread safe? 

message: It is not clear what is meant by the term 'channel' in the discussion of MPICH. I'm sure it has some technical meaning which could be elaborated on to the benefit of the article. Does it mean like a channel of distribution of MPICH or is it some other more technical reference?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.45.121.6 (talk) 14:35, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  changing the channel 
Talk:RFA Fort Rosalie (A186)

message: On May 21, this article was nominated for deletion. The discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/RFA Fort Rosalie (A186). The result was keep. —Xezbeth 06:50, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
The details listed appear to relate to the new Fort Rosalie. I will dig out the old ones soon.Dmgerrard 21:27, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Boston Post Road

message: There are current roads in towns such as Amherst, NH in other states in the US called "Boston Post Road".  Should there be any mention?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.98.6.230 (talk) 21:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 18:32, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Boston Post Roads 

message: Where is Attleborough City? What city or town is it in? Attleboro is on the state line, so if it the Post Road passed west of Attleboro, it was still in Rhode Island. Similarly, why is East Walpole, Massachusetts, a red link, better than East Walpole, Massachusetts? Is East Walpole not in Walpole? If not, what city or town is it in? AJD 06:57, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Attleborough City is the settlement along 123 between 1A and the split with Old Post Road, inside the town of Attleboro. The Post Road did not pass through the densest part of Attleboro. East Walpole is in Walpole, but it is a separate settlement and will hopefully one day have its own article. --SPUI (talk) 07:52, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like most maps don't show Attleborough City, so I've replaced it with South Attleboro, a bit to the south and also on the route. --SPUI (talk) 08:16, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Attleborough City

message: Someone summarily deleted the following text. If this text is not in error, it should be returned to the article. Wetman (talk) 11:19, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My understanding is that there was no Trail Association that managed the Boston Post Road and it also did not have any special pole markers, so in that sense it is not technically an auto trail. However, many automobile guidebooks do refer to the Lower Post Road, at least, as the "Boston Post Road" and that may have given the impression that it was an auto trail. It was simply marked in New England as a red bannered (east-west) pole route. --Polaron | Talk 13:27, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A [[National Auto Trail]]?
Talk:The Riftwar Saga

message: the plot summary was not overly long. The plot summary was simply about a complex book so I removed where it said the summary was too longGnrl-secret 18:48, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Overly long plot summary

message: Types of mythological or fantastic beings in contemporary fiction is a page of, well, fantasy works (movie, TV, written, whatever) and the assorted mythological and/or fantastic critters they contain.  This series would probably qualify.  Anyone care to add it? Tamtrible (talk) 10:36, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone familiar with this series care to add it to this list?
Talk:Arthur French, 5th Baron de Freyne

message: This article looks like a copyvio but I can't find a source. Rl 07:38, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: The comment that his marriage "appears to have been short lived" is questionable.  The couple may have lived apart for considerable periods and certainly produced no children, but they never legally divorced.  After his death his wife continued to appear in "Kelly's Handbook" listed as "Annabel, lady De Freyne" until her last entry in 1962 (year she died, according to "Complete Peerage, Volume XIV").Cloptonson (talk) 14:50, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriage
Talk:Intercultural communication principles

message: I have essentially rewritten this page to convert it from a book review into something that can be a page of general interest in an encyclopedia. I hope it is reasonable, if not, everyone else should feel free to pitch in. --David91
:Seems quite reasonable. Might need a few more references.--Dakota ~ ε ° 22:50, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I got an error as well; I went ahead and removed it as being dead. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 17:04, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

text: Hello, I edited the use of words and worked on tone to reflect encyclopedia tone Wikieditor0725 (talk) 02:58, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Hi, this is kaddif, i has modified some details and add some academic reference.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaddif (talk • contribs) 01:03, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  modified some ideas and add some academic reference 

message: ethnocentric, prejudice and stereotypes how it impact the communication barriers 155.238.5.1 (talk) 18:55, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  intercultural communication
Talk:Middle Eastern studies

message: Artice has been kept after this Votes for deletion debte. Sjakkalle 08:01, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: What is he, really, succinctly? A polemicist? A scholar? A commentator? A student of Middle Eastern affairs? To judge from his page here and other debates, he doesn't seem to be accepted as a serious scholar the way Kramer and Said are. Palmiro | Talk 16:32, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Daniel Pipes
Talk:God, the Devil and Bob

message: The Characters section says "Donna Allman...has recently returned to college after 14 years of parenting," but then calls Megan "Bob and Donna's 13-year-old daughter and eldest child." This might not be impossible if Donna had a child a year before Megan (but not with Bob, or if that child died), but i don't see anything in the article that says that.
The Characters section says "God...enjoys poptarts". Should that be spelled (and linked to) Pop-Tarts, or is it like using "coke" to refer to any soft drink, not just Coke?
Because the Devil is a specific character in this show, should the word Devil always use a capital D in this article?
--71.121.143.213 (talk) 19:15, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  typos and math error?
Talk:Jimmy Smits

message: I'M CURIOUS ABOUT JIMMY SMITTS. WHILE WORKING AS A NURSES ASSISTANT IN TULSA , OK, IN THE LATE 1990'S, I CARED FOR A PATIENT NAMED LORETTA SMIT. SHE CLAIMED THAT JIMMY SMIT WAS HER SON. THE OTHER NURSES SAID HE HAD BEEN THERE TO SEE HER. BUT HIS BIO NAMES HIS MOTHER AS EMELINA.SO NOW I'M CONFUSED. WHERE IS HIS MOTHER NOW?
 
honey that is what i want to know where is she now  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.226.2.229 (talk) 23:54, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can I just say that the above bio is slightly wrong when it says that he is the only character to be mentioned by his real name and star as a fictional character?  Matt Perry was also named by donna Moss/Janel Moloney in Season 1 and appeared as Joe Quincy in Seasons 4 and 5.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.92.40.49 (talk • contribs) 
*Damn, I think you're right. That's my error - I'll correct it now. - Hayter 16:28, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Real and fictional

message: I think that this article needs a lot of work. There is a lot left out. --evrik 16:47, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In the first episode of the fifth season, he played Jimmy Wilks, the Conky 2000 repairman.  In fact, the episode is airing right as I type this. Cale 07:31, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fleshing this out

message: Why do you keep removing my edits? Are you protecting him? LATruthLA (talk) 20:41, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This edit? Needs a reference. I don't see anything that isn't already on the page. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:46, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed edits
Talk:Charles Grant

message: There is no way this is possible. Because as well as the mere idea of a football player being able to write books about wargaming being simply mad, this football player would have been a mere kid (or even not alive!) when a lot of Grant's books was published.   Mathmo 10:22, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Author and football player!

message: Was the TV-movie Charlie Grant's War based on a real person? I kind of thought it was although Wikipedia does not seem to have an article on him. In the movie, Charlie Grant (played by R. H. Thomson) is a Canadian guy in Germany who hides Jews from the Gestapo. --Mathew5000 (talk) 07:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charlie Grant's War
Talk:List of modern artists

message: People should start bios for red links when they add the names.Soane 14:24, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Red links

message: I think that this list is a perfect candidate for being converted into a category. There are almost no redlinks, so it's not serving as much of a placeholder for articles that need to be created. Also, in an unannotated list like this, there's no evidence of notability for any name that is redlinked. I haven't examined the history in depth, but a quick look (and common sense) shows that this article could easily be a magnet for non-notable vanity additions. --Icarus (Hi!) 19:21, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turn into category? 

message: I see an editor has added Wood to this list. Although he's contemporary to the early modernists, can we actually classify him as a modern artist by the definition at modern art? I'm not sure, so I've left the name in place. Any editor more well-versed than myself in American figurative art from that period may want to make an editorial decision on this. freshacconcispeaktome 00:50, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Grant Wood]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Modern Artists. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 5#Modern Artists until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:52, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Modern Artists" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Modern Painter. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 5#Modern Painter until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:53, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Modern Painter" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:KiKA

message: KiKa → KI.KA -- Sloyment 12:49, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. violet/riga (t) 10:44, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move (2005)

message: "KI.KA plays a loop of Bernd das Brot films every night, during its notional close-down period from 9pm to 6am, causing bafflement to non-German viewers."
Does it? Really? Because its a blue screen with the KI.KA logo and "KI.KA sendet wieder ab 6 uhr." on satellite...  --Kiand 21:10, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the Kika sendet wieder ab 6 always comes right after the end of the broadcast, if you want to watch Bernd das Brot you have to wait a while after the end of the broadcast. -Killarnee (C•T•U) 20:47, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bernd das Brot 

message: Is it possible to get KI.KA in North America?
:No. --Kiand 18:59, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  North America 

message: Kika's Mascot used to be a Rabbit. And, it used to Air Mama Mirabelle (2007-2015), Jonalu, and Jakers! The Adventures of Piggley Winks. Snuggleblanket (talk) 11:11, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Mascot 
Talk:Flag of Saudi Arabia

message: So, even though the Saudi government gave official rules on the colour of the flag, does this still mean that the current colouration should go all the way back to 1973? Was the darker shade of green at RGB 0 84 48 go all the way back to 1973, or should there be an old version of the flag with the RGB 0 108 53 that would have been the flag until the now official colours were standardized. Has anyone even checked to see? NDV135 (talk) 21:57, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saudi Flag historical colour?
Talk:Cheng Hoon Teng Temple

message: Dear fellas, Malaysia does not have any cultural world heritage in the UNESCO list yet.   Pls check List of World Heritage Sites in Asia and Australasia and have both articles tally and correct.
Is it ok to remove the {gcheck} copyediting tag? Any objections? Please explaim (if any). 
I have ammended some of my mistakes, anyway. There is nothing much to copyedit such a short article.
tan 19:09, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid that there is, and your edits didn't deal with any of them (with the possible exception of "notable" for "peculiar".  You moved a fact from one place to another for no obvious reason, added a vague and past-tense passive construction (something that I and others have explained on numerous occasions isn't aceptable), and removed the description "richly decorated".  Genuine problems (such as what or who is "entombed", and where) remain untouched. Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 21:55, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

text: Nice work. Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 11:57, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Heritage Site category removed
Talk:Dynamic disk

message: Removed the earlier information, it was copied from this page: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;254105&FR=1&PA=1&SD=HSCH
and therefore copyrighted by Microsoft. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sflu (talk • contribs) 11:21, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation
Category talk:Terri Schiavo case

message: I was thinking of adding the missing elements, the internal links shown above, but can't seem to edit it. Viriditas, you were the last one to work on the page; can you dro pme a note and/or put in the other pages that seem to fin in the catagory? Thanks, --GordonWattsDotCom_In_Florida 11:29, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Message received and reply left on your page. Thanks.--GordonWattsDotCom_In_Florida 06:18, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  help needed to disambiguate
Talk:Gene Spafford

message: No question that Spaf is a "living legend" having just appeared before Congress, and no one I know would dispute his expertise - but does this violate the Wiki policy on living individuals? I am all for giving credit to Spaf, he has been both an inspiration and a teacher to me, but I think an encyclopedia needs to maintain its integrity by noting that which has lasted through time (which I think the "living individuals" policy meant to address). I defintely vote for Spaf as a very influential person in contemporary society in security, but does this constitute what encyclopedia provide? No offense to anyone, especially Spaf, but in my opinion, writings such as these diminish the importance and credibility of Wikipedia as a true encyclopedia.
:Spafford is sufficiently notable to warrant a BLP entry in Wikipedia. Article does need a major cleanup, which I will try to do.--FeralOink (talk) 01:17, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I made major excisions to this BLP article. You were so correct, unsigned commenter! Thank you.--FeralOink (talk) 14:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: do we really need a ref to this Spafford's post after every his axiom and corollary? I think one would be enough. --grawity 13:51, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, we don't need them! Nor do we need his axioms and corollaries! Editors long before me excised them. You were correct, and I'm glad someone listened. I pruned back more of the Spaf hagiography per WP:MOS. There's still plenty of kruft remaining, but it is better than before.-- FeralOink (talk) 15:35, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs for Gene's axioms 

message: Sometimes links to google groups pages are leading people to google sign in pages and not to the articles referenced. Rather than force people to sign up for a google account to see the article, try to use links to things that don't require a registration of any sort to view them if such is available.  Even people who already have google mail accounts are still being asked to sign up for a "google account" to see the actually referenced web page. Jjk (talk) 03:42, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  minor linking prob
Talk:Santo & Johnny

message: What Happend To Johnny of Santo and Johnny Fame?
Did Johnny Die?
Merle Haggard also do a great job with this song on a 1965 album.
I am not sure how this album, Santo y Johnny en Mexico, fits into their discography.
album front:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Santo%26JohnnyEnMexicoFrontSmall.jpg
album rear: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Santo%26JohnnyEnMexicoBack01Small.jpg
(361ek 21:40, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Johnny Santo 

message: From the article "Santo Anthony Farina and John Steven Farina were born" - "Santo Anthony Farina" and "John Steven Farina" are redirects to ...guess what? THIS page! One would expect to get an article describing both artists. So I wonder is a redirct necessary? I doubt it! 80.151.9.187 (talk)   —Preceding undated comment added 13:21, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ReDirect necessary? 

message: Most of this article is a duplicate of .  Unless they borrowed the text from here (it's happened before) someone needs to rewrite to avoid copyright trouble. Tom Duff 21:33, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Trouble? 
Talk:Proximity of blood

message: This obviously deal~s with Middle Ages, but this basically is abstract principle, not restricted to Middle Ages. 62.78.126.74 12:17, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: First example is incomprehensible because the relationship of Philip to Robert the Duke is not explained.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.124.153 (talk) 01:15, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Philip?