lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Domains by Proxy

message: — JIP | Talk 20:09, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

message: fauxdaddy.org redirects to godaddy.com and the blog post does not say very much.  Is it a suitable wiki entry?  --Lord Matt 12:08, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some thoughts 

message: The article describes how the proxy service is helpful to domain registrants in that it protects them from spammers.  It does not mention the problems for end users who might experience browser hijacks, slander/libel and other difficulties.  Micahmedia (talk) 23:36, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: (Moved my comment to the Discussion on the Domain privacy topic - Lokatone (talk) 14:07, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV issue 

message: It has been rumored for years that GoDaddy has Domains by Proxy auto-purchase domain names that are considered lucrative.  Numerous anecdotes of domains being available, and then 5 minutes after a check via GoDaddy they are suddenly already purchased, registered and made unavailable by Domains by Proxy, to the extent that many domainers (people that buy & sell domains) refuse to use GoDaddy in order to check to see if a particular domain name is available.Jonny Quick (talk) 01:45, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't really domain tasting.  It's more like domain name front running.  Go Daddy may have done so in the past, but doesn't appear to do so now.  I entered an unlikely, silly URL into the Go Daddy WHOIS database search, pimp-my-wiki.com, and it was reported as "available".  I checked it again 20 minutes later and it was still available. — QuicksilverT @ 20:48, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Domain tasting? 

message: "Domains by Proxy" is a screen for numerous special interest and political action websites. Hence, if a web citizen sees a "Sign this to free the whales from mascara testing and make them free range," the web page itself may resolve to Domains by Proxy. That, by itself, might just mean the site is cheap, but it has, in the past, also meant that the site is data mining or creepy. As more and more "click here to sign the petition" and "click here to take action" links appear, mailing lists are getting longer, and anonymous hosting services like this are becoming more and more politically. . . notable. 64.234.66.158 (talk) 12:19, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quite notable, alas
Talk:Sivakasi

message: The article requires a major revamp as far as formatting goes. The content seems satisfactory, though.
The information on Ragland Memorial Church (CSI church) is irrelevant to the History of Sivakasi.
210.211.196.141 11:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If the name spelled in English is the trouble maker, and astrological effects 
are only for English alphabets, then better avoid that language from official 
use.  Instead of spending money in changing the name, let government and 
people concentrate on following strict safety norms. Ref: http://www.ptinews.com/news/412728_Campaign-to-change-name-of-town  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.47.165 (talk) 04:16, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sivakasi to be named as Sivakaasi 

message: "The town is known for firecrackers and matches factories"  Is it known for firecrackers and for matches factories or for factories that produce both firecrackers and matches?  Not sure the best way to phrase that sentence, but it is currently ambiguous. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 06:32, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Philosopher This city is well known for its matches factories and firecrackers industry in large scale and small scale too. But Sivakasi fireworks earned a brand status in south india. In India, these fireworks are well known and are used mainly in festival celebrated with fireworks, i.e., Deepawali. This is the information I can provide without a quick google search. Try phrasing it in a best way. --Pavan santhosh.s (talk) 08:41, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  I removed the "-s" from the quoted sentence, fixing the ambiguity problem.  The brand recognition may also deserve a place in the article, but as I am unfamiliar with the subject, I'll leave it to someone else to add. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 00:01, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead problem 

message: Please remove this paragraph as this les to communal hatred and rude behaviour among youths. 117.222.140.134 (talk) 19:35, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No. See WP:NOTCENSORED ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:37, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sivakasi riot paragraph in wiki page
Talk:HT-0712

message: I don't understand the mention of gene-therabpy in this article. is the drug to be used in conjunction with gene therapy? Is use of the drug a type of gene therapy? 134.173.121.223 20:12, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Image with stereochemistry added.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

message: God has told me 0712 is of his doings 2603:9000:9300:5D03:44AE:206C:9C7A:12F5 (talk) 08:29, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This correct
Talk:R55 (New York City Subway car)

message: I think this car class wass really the R55 contract. The R83 according to a R-Type contract list was for MOW equipment. Ken S. 20:33, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  R55 or R83 

message: I considered a merge to R68 but could not find any references. Jeepday (talk) 11:08, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Feliks Koneczny

message: "In his anti-semitic publication The Judaized Hitlerism Piotr Koneczny even claimed, that Nazism was a product of Jewish civilization."
Is "Piotr Koneczny" the same person as Feliks Koneczny ?
There's a big controversy these days about the publication of a Polish MEP who is quite enthusiastic over Koneczny.
--Pylambert 18:02, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A typo. Thanks. All other information still is correct. M0RD00R 18:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

text: It links directly towards the pdf-book, on the website of MEP Maciej Giertych. Read the press review I collected (in French) and an article in Ha'aretz --Pylambert 21:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Piotr Koneczny ? 
Talk:Kazu Shioda

message: Does anyone remember where the Shioda spelling originated? His family name is actually Shiota as printed in the Japanese books and also on Konaka's site. Did they give full character names in the US credits? (if they'd only release DVDs I could check myself) Shiroi Hane 20:46, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Shioda?

message: Is that a cross or the crest?
I't probably the crist in the dub but what is it... Really? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.85.52.51 (talk • contribs).
:I donno, but if we don't have anything to back it up then we really shouldn't comment on it, per WP:V. -- Ned Scott 06:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cross
Talk:Henri Labrouste

message: I'm finding it difficult to parse the following into a good article in English.  Can anyone help?
:Le séjour à Rome : Pensionnaires de l’Etat pendant cinq ans, les lauréats sont logés à la Villa Médicis. Dans l’étude des monuments de l’Antiquité, ils « doivent rechercher les lois des proportions pour les réduire en formules à l’usages des maîtres et des étudiants de Paris ». (Correspondance des directeurs de l’Académie de France à Rome, tome 1, p.28) Cette obligation se traduit par un envoi annuel adressé à l’Académie des Beaux-Arts ; « exposés publiquement à Paris, ces envois consistent pour la première année, détails d’architecture relevés sur les restes d’architecture antique. Pour la deuxième année en un relevé d’ensemble (état actuel) d’un de ces édifices. Les envois de troisième et quatrième année comportent la restauration et la restitution, plus ou moins hypothétiques ou basée sur des données historiques du monument précédemment relevé et d’un autre d’importance plus considérable. » (Encyclopédie de l’Architecture et de la Construction) Pour son envoi de première année, il soumet en avril sept dessins du Temple d’Antonin et de Faustine (1826) Les études romaines commencées l’année précédente nourrissent l’envoi de cette troisième année (1828) qui propose à l’aide de cinq dessins une comparaison entre le Colisée et le Théâtre de Marcellus. Il séjourne la même année par deux fois à Paestum. A son retour il commence la préparation de son envoi de quatrième année consacré aux temples de Paestum. l’année de changement de direction de l’Académie de France à Rome (Vernet remplace Guérin en 1829), voit Labrouste visiter les tombes étrusques de Tarquinia et de Sutres mais aussi Tivoli. Il travaille à son cinquième envoi - un pont destiné à réunir le France et l’Italie - quand arrive à Rome un rapport de l’Académie critiquant la restauration qu’il a fait de Paestum.
I'm left to assume that Labrouste was sent on some sort of externship to Rome to study the art of antiquity.  Comments? Bo-Lingua 20:52, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The text needed for expansion is already embedded in the article and blanked. WQUlrich (talk) 17:32, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand
Talk:Dodge Ramcharger

message: Ram...charger. Hah.--Jnelson09 21:00, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, but the Ramcharger (see also i.e. the german wikipedia entry is neither a Ram nor a Charger.(at least we do know now Dodge could make up one name and name 3 vehicles with it :) — SuNotísimaTalk 22:00, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the Dodge Ramcharger was the same thing as a 1st-generation Dodge Ram with a roof and bench seat on the pickup bed (although it bears no relation to the Charger). —Reelcheeper (talk) 02:36, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name discussion

message: On the sides of these vehicles, the word "Ram" is above "Charger." The title of this article is "Dodge Ramcharger"? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.136.96.119 (talk) 00:08, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  One word? 

message: Does anyone know the exact years when the 3rd-gen Mexican-only Ramcharger was produced? It uses the back door of the Caravan, so I would guess it was produced into 2001 to use up parts from the 1996-2000 Caravans. —Reelcheeper (talk) 01:58, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mexican Ramcharger

message: Mechanically, the first-gen Ram/2nd-gen Ramcharger was little more than a rebranded & facelifted D/W series/1st-gen Ramcharger. They were the same truck underneath. Why should a separate section be kept for the 81-93 Ramcharger if it was little more than a slight visual redesign of the 74-80 Ramcharger? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pabst blue ribbon led zeppelin (talk • contribs) 15:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd surmise that the reason it was done that way in the first place is so the Ramcharger aligns with how the pickups are organized. I don't think it would help a reader's understanding to combine them here, so I think they should stay separated as they are. --Sable232 (talk) 22:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I would argue that it actually hinders a reader's understanding of the Ramcharger. The pickup might have been rebranded in 1981, but the Ramcharger was the exact same as it had been since the beginning. Neither the branding nor mechanics changed. There's no reason to count it as a separate generation. This also isn't done anywhere else. The R/V-based Blazer & Suburban as well as the V-Jimmy aren't counted as separate generations because of a simple branding change from "C/K" to "R/V". The same thing happened with the Ramcharger. Aside from a front fascia change and the shift to a nonremovable roof (precedent also with the K5 Blazer, as a similar change didn't warrant a separate generation), the 1979, 1980 and 1981 Ramchargers are all identical. Pabst blue ribbon led zeppelin (talk • contribs) 18:48, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  D-series/Ram merger
Talk:Lorimar Television

message: The logo article are too over glorified and overwhelm the actual article and should be shortened and the article rewritten to focus more on the company --Stdjsb25 21:43, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: You forgot to mention Hunter. It said at IMDB that Hunter was produced by Lorimar. Is this right? 71.111.232.40 16:20, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hunter 

message: Warner Bros.' website says that in 1989, they've bought Lorimar-Telepictures in 1989, not 1988.  King Shadeed 0:43, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lorimar-Telepictures buyout 

message: Who did that eerie music for Lorimar? I am referring to the original music for the logo from the 1970's?
I mean, I get chills hearing that, is it was from my childhood.  
K8cpa (talk) 15:55, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here's a question for all of you.... 

message: Gil Millrer playing the Lorimar Symphonics, Tacko Belle LP 441 835-2. When was this issued?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.13.72.198 (talk) 20:38, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lorimar Symphonics
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Danielle Van Dam

message: This afd didn't result in a clear consensus, despite being left open a few more days. Regardless of the article, the afd did not result in a clear decision, although Extreme Unction currently is relisting. karmafist 21:32, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

message: The following comment posted after the deletion discussion was closed has been moved from the project page. -- Dalbury(Talk) 10:22, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved comment
Talk:Edinburgh City Bypass

message: Can't we rename this article "Edinburgh Bypass"? That's what it's called by everyone there! --MacRusgail 21:38, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah, standard practise on the uk road articles is to name them using the number - remember City of Edinburgh Bypass, Edinburgh City Bypass and Edinburgh Bypass all redirect to the article (well they do now). wangi 22:04, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The only time I've ever heard it called "A720" is when someone is reading it off a signpost. --MacRusgail 13:35, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's always been "the city bypass" to my family; never "Edinburgh bypass". – Kieran T (talk) 02:05, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "City bypass" is not a good name, as I'm sure a number of other roads are referred to by that name elsewhere... --MacRusgail (talk) 14:54, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Battle of Ballinamuck

message: Sorry, my first edit was not intended to be minor. I've been doing minor edits for several hours and clicked minor without thinking.--File Éireann 21:39, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Ballinamuck 

message: Currently the article says:
:The Irish fought on, not having the option of surrender.
Having presumably been given the option to surrender with the French then given I would have thought surrender at discretion and no quarter came into play under the laws of war as they were at the time. Perhaps someone who has access to a source about the the battle could expand that sentence.  --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 12:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: All very reminiscent of the War in the Vendée from 1793.86.42.217.228 (talk) 14:44, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Surrender at discretion

message: How did 5,000 Irish recruits shrink to 1,000 within a couple of weeks? Could someone check the real numbers?86.42.195.76 (talk) 11:01, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Numbers

message: This massive run-on sentence is very far from clear: 
This could be taken to mean that Conroy was hanged along with Blake, or that Conroy was hunted (as Blake was), but that Conroy successfully fled through Windy Gap. Either way it should be two sentences. I'd fix it, but there's no reference for me to go on. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 18:07, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  run on sentence makes for unclarity 

message: "Ballinamuck Visitor Centre". Longford Tourism. 8 April 2013. Retrieved 30 August 2017.
Ballinamuck -Things to Do & See: Battlefield Centre - 1798 Hall, archived from the original on 18 November 2007
The first source is a dead link. The second makes only passing reference to the events described in the paragraph. A more substantial source is required for reprisals after the battle.
JF42 (talk) 11:10, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead links & insufficient sources for 'Aftermath' paragraph
Talk:Pacific Oaks College

message: I'd assume that students at Pacific Oaks are not permited to copy text from encyclopedia and submit it as their own work. The same standard applies in reverse. Please don't copy material from other sources to paste into this article. Please use your own words. Thank you. -Willmcw 21:44, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copying

message: Not sure how reliable the source is but it does sound like POC has run into some troubles and may lose accreditation.  http://www.pacificoakssos.com/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justsomeoneelse2 (talk • contribs) 17:46, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Accreditation
Talk:Tatana Sterba

message: I removed it again. Autobiographies (or, in this case, biographies) may have neutrality problems, but there's nothing which could be tainted as non-NPOV in this article. Chart positions, dates of release and the person's date of birth are not really able to be put in a biased manner. Hedley 21:52, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced template 

message: Should we move it to DJ Tatana, given that she is better known as a DJ than for her actual name? --Yury Petrachenko 07:08, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move the page to DJ Tatana?
Talk:Riverside Geyser

message: Surely somebody has their own picture of this one. Stan 21:58, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Answering my own question, the NPS has a great selection of good shots, which I shall be uploading to commons shortly. Stan 22:01, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Stan 23:28, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Hugo Distler

message: When i was in college, our organ teacher said that  during the course of the war Distler had applied for several deferments from being drafted; each time thinking it would not be approved and yet, each time, it was.
And (here's the too-dramatic-to-be-true part) right after he killed himself, sure that no more deferments would be granted, yet another deferment arrived in the mail.
Is there any truth to this story?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.119.204.117 (talk) 18:07, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draft deferments?
Talk:Carel Struycken

message: Major part of the Biography section seems to be copied from http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0835393/bio - Ilse@ 23:36, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright infringement 

message: This article needs a picture of Carel. I can't find one right now that meets the guidelines; so I've put up a request. --oKtosiTe talk 17:59, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: I rewrote the article, trying to use as much of the original content as possible. It was not my desire to change anyone's edits. If you feel that I have not done a good job, please feel free to change the article according to current guidelines. --JHvW (talk) 12:06, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Fearless Freep

message: Is this really a useful article?  I can't imagine anyone attempting to look up a non-character from a single cartoon filmed half a century ago.  Fearless Freep wasn't simply unseen, he was never in the cartoon at all.  At best, the name should re-direct to the page for "High Diving Hare", which notably doesn't even bother to link to this non-topic.  Discussion? Matt Deres 22:11, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion or Redirection?
Talk:Hurricane Hilda (1955)

message: Needs more impact. Jdorje 04:14, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: There needs to be something about why Hilda was not retired. As I understand it as a decided non-expert, a storm causing this much damage should be almost a dead cert for retirement. If there's stuff available about why it wasn't retired, that really needs to be in the article. Loganberry (Talk) 22:14, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of retirement 

message: The current revision of the article credits Hilda as a Category 5 hurricane. Where the heck did that come from? --Dylan620 (Home • yadda yadda yadda • Ooooohh!) 00:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:27, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Funny thing is, that error hadn't been caught for over a month! --Dylan620 (Home • yadda yadda yadda • Ooooohh!) 12:44, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, but non-blatant vandalism tends to stick around a bit longer. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 15:25, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism? 
Talk:Warner Communications

message: This article by itself is useles....I call for this article to be merged with the Time Warner article.--Stdjsb25 22:18, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree, Warner Communications was heavy influential in the 70s and 80s and deserves its own article. warpozio 23:01, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

text: I disagree, there are a lot of bigger/small record labels which are aquired by the Big Four group. If we start working like that, 90% of those aquired labels can be merged as well... warpozio 09:41, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

message: I propose that Warner Communications be merged into Time Warner. I think that the content in the Warner Communications article can easily be explained in the context of Time Warner, and the Time Warner article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Warner Communications will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. 190.90.189.54 (talk) 16:40, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: * Don't merge - For the reasons warpozio & SterlingNorth stated in above section. 76.235.248.47 (talk) 03:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:A Sort of Homecoming (album)

message: Someone should add appropriate information to the Dream Theater main page to get this page off of the orphaned pages list.
: Here is the text to do so (in the discography table)
|-
| 2004
| A Sort of Homecoming
| CD recorded primarily at Madison Square Garden in New York, USA
:But I must ask, is this for real? Amazon.com and the official DT site have no record of this album, can anyone provide a cite that it's not a bootleg? search suggests it is. Note I am not a DT fan nor knowledgable, just ran across this on orphans. ++Lar 03:39, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If this was a fan club offering, then wouldn't it be authorized by the band? If so, it would not be a bootleg recording. Let's just call it a fan club release. -Freekee (talk) 04:53, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I put a hatnote in for anyone searching for the U2 song. But shouldn't that be the other way around? More people are likely to be searching for the song. Daniel Case 05:14, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're right. I moved the page, but I left the U2 version at (U2 song), made this one (Dream Theater album). -Freekee (talk) 05:14, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move
Talk:Lowell High School (Massachusetts)

message: This book is a good resource: The Irony of Victory: World War II and Lowell, Massachusetts Marc Miller 1988NegMawon (talk) 16:47, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: WWII and Girl Officers

message: It was voted in 1999 as one of the top 100 high schools in the United States.
*By whom? - Mgm|(talk) 00:21, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote Attribution
Talk:2003–04 Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone season

message: I will add a MODIS image of Cyclone Frank.  Irfanfaiz 12:42, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Frank's new image

message: Who would delete this thread? It probably got enough information to be start classed or b-classed. --IrfanFaiz 10:51, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion