lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Als het om de liefde gaat

message: Concerning the ESC song stubs in general, the main body of the article tends, inevitably, to be a repetition of information that is already in the info-box. The "meat in the sandwich", capable of later expansion, is what appears between the first and last paragraphs. I do think, however, that such formulaic final paragraphs as   
:It was succeeded as Dutch representative at the 1973 Contest by Ben Cramer with "De Oude Muzikant".
(which I have edited out here) constitute a repetition too far. The information is in the info-box, so is not lost, but is not strictly relevant to an article about the song in itself. Use of the word "representative" is problematic too, in my view, since the Dutch/French/Icelandic etc. representative is the singer not the song: the latter is the Dutch/French/Icelandic etc. entry. Finally, I think it improves the article to give the pride of final place to the information about the result on the night. --Picapica (talk) 08:27, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repetition of information
Talk:Amami se vuoi

message: Don't know if this is a point worth noting, but this song was used for a while in the UK in an advertisement for Fiat cars - which is where I heard it. Since I can't be sure of the model of car or of the year of the advertisement, I've not added this to the main entry.
If anyone else has this information, then it might be worth adding.
It might also be worth debating whether this sort of additional use (advertisements, films etc) is worth adding, since in some cases such a list might overwhelm the main entry.
Jorvikian (talk) 01:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: This song appeared in a British commercial
Talk:Cannibalism in the Americas

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: page moved.  Gawaon (talk) 10:25, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Cannibalism in pre-Columbian America →  – I suggest this more generic name to allow better coverage of cases that happened after Columbus (and nearly all information that we have is at least technically "post-Columbian") and to allowing merging this article with the relevant parts of , while preserving its history. See  for more rationale and discussion. Gawaon (talk) 18:47, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

text: No replies, that means no objections, I guess! I'll move the page now. Gawaon (talk) 10:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 February 2024
Talk:Indianola Mississippi Seeds

message: I'm parking some quotes and sources here to later add to the article:
*"I know the critics always mention Live and Well or Live at the Regal, but I think that Indianola Mississippi Seeds was the best album that I've done artistically." Jas Obrecht, Rollin' and Tumblin': The Postwar Blues Guitarists, Backbeat Books, 2000, p.328 ()
*On using strings: "I have had some people that weren't thinking.  They'd come up and say something about it, but they didn't realize that I was using strings in the early '50s, with things like "My Heart Belongs to Only You," "How Do I Love You," "The Keys to My Kingdom," and quite a few things like that.  We were using strings long before, "The Thrill is Gone," many years before.  But those critics didn't say much about that.  They though you were being Mr. Big or you were being jazzy.  My answer is this: If the song needs just a guitar and me singing, we use that, and if you need something else to make it, then you should use that.  Whether it be a full orchestra or just a harmonica and guitar—whatever is needed, that's what you should use, though I don't think that one should put a lot of stuff in there just to put it in there." Obrecht, p. 328-9
*Town listed in: Steve Cheseborough, Blues Traveling: The Holy Sites of the Delta Blues, University Press of Mississippi, 2004, p. 147 ()
-MrFizyx 21:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stuff to add
Talk:Vlatka Pokos

message: I removed several paragraphs, none of which were sourced and all of which were detrimental.
The entire controversies section seems detrimental on the face of it. I'm in no position to evaluate local Croatian magazine articles. Perhaps someone could pick this up and check it's actually NPOV. JohnHarris (talk) 16:01, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies
Talk:Cross Your Heart

message: The following was moved from the article; "This Entry is incorrect "Cross your Heart" was written by Ted O'Neill under the Pseudonym Paul Lyttle which is registered with PRS/MCPS in London by Ted O'Neill. It was published by Bardes Music in Ireland and United Artists for the rest of the World. Check with any of the above to verify these facts." Anyone interested can check the history of the article for when and by whom it was posted. Cheers. LessHeard vanU 21:30, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  moved from article
Talk:Honey garlic sauce

message: This is an article about Honey Garlic Sauce.  If you have any additional info, please add, we can "source" it later....  --Tallrichard2 07:16, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a spice with the same common name in English - Nectaroscordum siculum ssp. bulgaricum syn. Allium bulgaricum is being called Honey Garlic. Shouldn't it be added as a reference as not to confuse?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.142.29.217 (talk) 21:39, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honey garlic
Talk:TheatreWorks

message: I'm not sure if the TheatreWorks article should reflect only TheatreWorks Singapore.  Looking at the history, one can see that this article was previously TheatreWorks (Singapore), which seems a more appropriate title considering the article is only about the Singapore theatre.  TheatreWorks based in Palo Alto, CA, is in its 37th year, meaning that is has been around a bit longer than TheatreWorks Singapore.  If this article is going to attempt to encompass all theatres with the name TheatreWorks, perhaps each one should have its own section.  Otherwise, the article seems to me to be a little misleading considering its title. - Tjazar 17:13, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriate redirect? 

message: I've been working on expanding the section about TheatreWorks in Silicon Valley, and I'm finding enough information that I think it warrants it's own page. CJC (talk) 00:26, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate Articles
Talk:Rainhard Fendrich

message: I improved some of the text, because I saw it was written by a German/Austrian. I am also Austrian, BTW. :)--Dieterbrodnik 09:39, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Improved article

message: After adding sources over the last few months, I think it's fair to remove the box about additional citations needed from the top of the page. Schnitzelking (talk) 07:57, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove Template:BLP sources
Talk:Get a Life – Get Alive

message: :Image:2010322g.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 23:04, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:2010322g.jpg
Talk:Halayla

message: I downloaded the whole 80s decade, all songs from Eurovision contest, and I must say that this song is my favorite from the 80s. I remember it as a kid, listening the contest in Yugoslavia, and then realized that actually always Israel and Italy have the best songs of the Eurovisions songs, and of the 80s Eurovision songs, this one is for me Israeli's best. It is unbelievably powerful and beautiful, perfectly arranged and simply unforgettable (haunting me like few other great songs did through my life), and I believe that anyone that knows what really good music is (people with musical education, especially those with knowledge of classical music too) must admit that this song has indeed a special value as a musical master-piece...The middle part of the song gives you an impression that it's gonna reach the sky with its fullness...STUNNINGLY BEAUTIFUL (beyond words!)...NDru01 208.65.244.122 10:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Absolutely amazing song !!
Talk:Storage Resource Broker

message: The article seems neutral and the editors personal opinions don't seem to be expressed. 
An aspect that may seem not neutral is that there are only pros and no cons to it.
Therefore I haven't taken of the tag and this would count as first attempt. 
Airbender3 (talk) 02:27, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seems Neutral 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:26, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, this has been stagnant for a while. As far as I can tell, it was an attempt to get some government grants by using lots of acronyms and Capital Letters a while back. Will take a look to see if it has historical value or should be deleted. W Nowicki (talk) 21:26, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 
Talk:I giorni dell'arcobaleno

message: I know this song by heart (in Italian) and I don't think the contents of the lyrics are accurately described. (I have made the corresponding changes)
For example, the article implied that the singer is speaking about the romance between himsef and the woman to whom the lyrics are addressed. That is not evident from the lyrics themselves - referring to her "lover", he speaks in the third person. 
Also, there was the implicit assumption that, by having "grown up" (at fifteen!), she was "ready to face the world". 
Again, there is no such implication in the song; on the contrary, the song is very nostalgic in that it evokes the woman's "lost" childhood. It actually ends by saying that, having had a lover at the age of fiteen, she had turned her back on what - as she will eventually realise (that is the implication) - was "the best time (of her life)".— Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.142.23.51 (talk • contribs) 05:40, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  LYRICS
Talk:Teh tarik

message: The reason hawkers "pull the tea" is not for showmanship, it's to cool the tea. Also, it's not only Indian hawkers who do this. --Pavithran (talk) 12:05, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought it was so it would make a frothy drink. Even after mamak pulled the tea, it is still hot lah. 60.50.83.185 (talk) 07:30, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The reason

message: When was the tarik invented 42.60.254.221 (talk) 08:29, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was teh tarik invented
Talk:Tahu goreng

message: shouldn't there be a separate article, as this article's examples do not list East Asian dishes using fried tofu? 98.59.80.64 (talk) 20:53, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  on the subject of [[Fried tofu]]
Talk:Leicestershire Fire and Rescue Service

message: WP:NOTDIR is an important principle behind Wikipedia. A long list of personnel is not encyclopaedic. Nor is a long list of fire stations and appliances t.b.h. but I replaced the original unsourced / original research list with one that is properly sourced - and to be honest I'm happy if someone thinks that too goes against WP:NOTDIR and removes it too. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:42, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists of officers and stations
Talk:Shropshire Fire and Rescue Service

message: Wikipedia generically uses the term or title "Brigade Manager" to describe officers of the fire service whom have obtaied the rank of Cheif Fire Officer or County Fire Officer in the UK Fire Service.
The term or title "Brigade Manager" has not been widely accepted and does not reflect true accuracy. The term Cheif Fire Officer or Firemaster (in Scotland) should instead be used for clarity and to reflect accuracy  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.136.141 (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of the title Brigade Manager
Talk:Our Tampines Hub

message: Seeing how redundant this article it, I propose making it the new article page for "Our Tampines Hub" and to be renamed in due course. Older links to "Tampines Stadium" will be redirected here.32cravenfan (talk) 15:20, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title to be changed to "Our Tampines Hub"
Talk:Tan Kim Ching

message: Could this article be in violation of WP:OR? __earth (Talk) 09:57, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research? 
Talk:Tan Swie Hian

message: Parinti 89.137.194.38 (talk) 19:14, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Părinții săi au fost Tan Tan și Mayana de Zīo
Talk:Gravitational force

message: Guys, please don't keep redirecting the article to "Gravitation" and if you don't like what it contains then just place AfD on it so then hopefully some grownups join the discussion and instruct you about Wikipedia NPOV policy if you don't believe me. Jim 07:48, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear Jim, there is no reason to spend the time of the Wiki community on AfDs to deal with this. There is no reason in the world that people who want to read about "gravitational force" will read your rant instead of the article Newton's law of universal gravitation. If you really believe it's a useful thing to do to split the articles, please discuss it first on the Talk pages of the original article (especially now, that you know that there is a very strong objection to your changes from at least two Wikipedians). Yevgeny Kats 13:01, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agree w/Yevgeny. linas 17:29, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear Yevgeny, If you like Newton better than Einstein it's too bad but Wikipedia is also for high school students who like to know how gravitation looks today and not necessarily how it looked 300 years ago. Even if there is a lot of people like you, e.g. linas who supports you already, there are also some who would like to learn something more then Newtonian physics. So please revert to my old version and place AfD on it if you want it to be deleted for some reason. And state the reason too (e.g. "Einstein bad, Newton good"). There are certain rules for Wikipedia editors to be followed so please follow them. Jim 18:13, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Category talk:Films set in Berlin

message: please add any films you know which are wholely or partially set in Berlin Brclmu 03:57, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: this extraordinary effort in independent filmmaking (breathful) by a non-german cult master daryush shokof is a pride of the city and is entirely shot in berlin. 88.73.19.123 (talk) 16:40, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  breathful
Talk:Strong Bad Sings (and Other Type Hits)

message: Could we please just delete this article! After all, all the other Homestar Runner-related articles have been redirected to Homestar Runner as well! Why keep THIS one!? It's not as important as many of those redirected articles!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.176.221.26 (talk) 10:04, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why, you ask? Well, the people in the AfD discussion had some very good reasons. The character articles may be "more important" to you, but ultimately there's no point to them outside of the context of the main article; they repeat each other incessantly, to boot. This, on the other hand, stands by itself pretty well, especially as a WP:ALBUM article, not to mention as a record for the band that performed on it. There are actual formal reviews of this record, for Pete's sake. CaptHayfever 03:59, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

message: I'm wondering why "Trogdor" rediriects here. Shouldn't it redirect to the Trogdor section of the Strongbad article? Fiberglass | Monkey 03:23, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trogdor Redirect
Talk:Aaroniero Arleri

message: Looks like his name is spelled Aaroniero on the newest chapter cover. We still don't know the true spelling of his last name but, I say "Arleri" is not right. I know I know... "but Arleri is the romanization we decided on so don't change it". Kangarugh22 20:03, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with the "Aaroniero" reading (well, I suppose that is an "I"). I just didn't edited yet 'cause I don't remember how to move an article o.O - Access Timeco 20:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  name spelling 

message: right now, there is only a picture of Aaroniero with Nejibana, when there should be a picture of his actual release. Also, a better description of Glotonería is needed. I have uploaded an image of Glotonería from the latest chapter where it is featured on a two-page spread. CP9Zebra 18:24, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glotonería 

message: Why dont we replace the "(Deceased)" by his name now? (and refer to him in past tense). Lacking Lack 06:10, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't put the deceased tags by their names (see Jin Kariya, for example). As for the past-tense thing, I guess it would makes sense to do so. // DecaimientoPoético 06:14, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I suggest placing "(died like a chump)" by his name. ^_^ –Gunslinger47 06:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Past tense = bad. Fictional works are described in the present tense - compare "Aaroniero was an Espada" (implying he got kicked out of their ranks) and "Aaroniero is an Espada" (which he is, only he's dead). --Pentasyllabic 16:52, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After seeing the examples, I guess usng present tense would be the best option. // DecaimientoPoético 17:02, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  He seems dead
Talk:Arthur Rowley

message: the wikipedia page for Arthur and his Brother Jack mention the nickname  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.37.215.34 (talk) 12:45, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  were both brothers nicknamed "the Gunner" ? 

message: Reading this article today I noticed he had as his full name "George Arthur Rowley Jnr" which would suggest his father was identically named - but in the article the name only appears as Mark. I question how genuine the son's designation is. Citeable information anyone?Cloptonson (talk) 19:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The naming of the father as Mark is supported in a recently published biography of the Rowley brothers, The Forgotten Brothers by the late Ian Davidson, publisher Blue Army Publishing. This could be a mine of information to any user who is fortunate to acquire the book.Cloptonson (talk) 18:24, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Father's name?
File talk:Hockey field.svg

message: Right-click the image at  and save it to your computer. You'll notice that its file name is "420px-Hockey_field_large.png", which is almost identical to the name generated by the Mediawiki software when it made a raster rendering of the image for the image description page, "420px-Hockey_field.svg.png". Furthermore, it is highly unlikely that someone went through all the trouble to vectorize a raster image in a manner identical to the raster image. Usually vectorized copies of images have small differences from the original raster copy.
In short, the image we have is a vector image. The automatically generated rasterization of the image was copied and used on another web site without proper attribution. —Remember the dot (talk) 22:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lucy-Marie, note that the image posted here is in SVG format.  The image on that website is a PNG bitmap.   You can get a bitmap from a vector image, but you can't get a SVG image from a PNG.  They took the image from Wikipedia, which they are perfectly entitled to do under the public domain licence I placed the image under.  --Robert Merkel 02:23, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can this image be metricaterd to fall in line with the rest of the article.--Lucy-marie (talk) 12:34, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

text: A lot of the lines are incorrectly placed and sized. Like the 5 metre marks on the 23 metre lines and any marks inside the field (apart from circles and the outer dashed circles). As mentioned, please also put the distances in metric as they are the official measurements.Nij90 (talk) 04:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a copyright violation!
Talk:Simon Prebble

message: Removed the Career section, it was copied from http://tvannouncers.thetvroomplus.com/channel-34.html. Bib (talk) 15:18, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have restored this material. I think if you look at the revision history, it will become clear that the wikipedia material was copied by the TV announcers web site.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Verne Equinox (talk • contribs) 01:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks for putting it back. Sorry. I guess I should have put up a type of "possible copyvio" template before removing it then.Bib (talk) 18:04, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: April 2008: Career section

message: According to that page, Simon Prebble invented the Newton's cradle "executive toy".  Can anyone confirm?  Rojomoke (talk) 00:46, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newton's Cradle 
Talk:3d screensaver

message: Another user added the tag, so I figured I'd bring up the discussion here.  There is very little content here which is not also at screensaver.  I'd say this is more appropriate as a section, or maybe even just a mention, in that entry.  Wyatt Riot 08:23, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just asked for comments at Talk:Screensaver.  If nobody minds, I'll just go ahead and do the merge in a day or two.  Wyatt Riot 20:18, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Screensaver]]?
Talk:Trance fusion

message: is the name of the book also trance fusion?   thnx
Yeesh. There's short articles on Livetronica, Jamtronica and Trance fusion.  I don't think there's any difference between these. Is there anybody who cares to distinguish between these as genres, rather than different terms for the same thing?  As there's no consensus on what this genre is called, I don't think we can just redirect the other two terms to a single article. Or can we? I'm going to add a mention of the competing terms to each article.  
For what it's worth, it feels to me like trance fusion is almost exclusively a Disco Biscuits thing (i.e., STS9 et al. would more likely be called livetronica/jamtronica).  Any cites out there for other bands labelling themselves as trance fusion?  Any cites for any bands labelling themselves as livetronica/jamtronica?  
  
Looking around at self labelling on band websites and myspace pages:
STS9: Electronica/rock/crunk
Particle: Electronica/funk/jam band
The New Deal: Live Progressive Breakbeat House
Disco Biscuits: Electronica jam fusion & jam band electronica experimental
192.104.39.2 (talk) 17:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled