lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Delphinus

message: I have never heard it pronounced the way stated. It's DELL-fin-us, DELL-fin-ee 'dɛl.fɪn.ɘs, -i: at least in the UK. Walshie79 (talk) 22:52, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: Hi all, I am seeing reports that a star near/in Delphinus has gone nova. It is designated PNVJ20233073+2046041. iac74205 (talk) 04:27, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Nova

message: What is the age of the star called delphinus?
:There's no such star. Delphinus is a constellation. Said: Rursus 15:06, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Age?

message: Delphinus (constellation) → Delphinus: Delphinus redirects to Delphinus (constellation) anyhoo.—jiy (talk) 10:46, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
*Support—jiy (talk) 10:46, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

text: ===Result===
This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. WhiteNight T | @ | C 03:37, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
*Support—jiy (talk) 10:46, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting

message: :===Result===
This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. WhiteNight T | @ | C 03:37, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: how many star are in the constellation delphinus?????????  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.70.247.24 (talk) 19:11, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  how 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Sidney Hall - Urania's Mirror - Delphinus, Sagitta, Aquila, and Antinous.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 4, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-02-04. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:57, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Sidney Hall - Urania's Mirror - Delphinus, Sagitta, Aquila, and Antinous.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Battle of Spion Kop/Archive 1

message: References in Afrikaans are totally useless to virtually all readers of an English encyclopaedia. Anyone have anything in English that can be listed? Noel (talk) 17:50, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If you had bothered to follow the ISBN link of the book quoted, and looked at the South African National Library entry for it, you'd have seen that it is, in fact, mostly an Afrikaans translation of an English book.  Straw man. Dewet 19:36, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

text: No problem, just did that. Dewet 20:06, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Further reading

message: I am moving this article to the proper South African English title of Spioenkop. An example of why this has been done that most of my fellow South African editors may not be aware of is the fact that in Boston, the Battle of Bunker Hill Monument was built on the wrong hill. Because most Google links discuss the monument, this does not mean that the article about the battle should state that it took place on the wrong hill. Furthermore, it is not nationalism to state that an article pertaining to the history of that specific country is of national interest. No one would fault someone from the United States if someone said the Bunker Hill Battle was of US interest, and thus a proper American standard of spelling should be the name of the article. Furthermore, the only editor that would prefer this to remain at Spion Kop is Noel. Páll 08:43, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm an admin, I'll do whatever I need to. Páll 08:03, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

text: OK, I went ahead and started the vote below, as well as adding it to WP:RM. Dewet 06:45, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final move 

message: #Dewet 06:43, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Support

message: #Philip Baird Shearer 15:01, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Oppose
Talk:Edward Lutyens

message: Googling for a "Edward Lutyens" produces a range of hits referring to an eminent British architect who worked with Gertrude Jekyll, and designed both the Cenotaph and New Delhi. The problem is that it was Edwin Lutyens who did that, not Edward. So I suspect the main source of hits for this page would be people who have the name wrong. Perhaps it should be a redirect rather than a link, or maybe they need to be made aware of the mistake. Average Earthman 17:43, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Rescue dog

message: Rescued dog would be a shelter dog someone rescued. The dog got rescued it does not rescue anything, please adjust page title and contents to the proper terms, separate if both are used here as they are not the same at all. Rescue dog would rescue things not be rescued.
This article seems to be about two subjects, dogs which rescue people and dogs which have been rescued from destruction. Would it not be a good idea to seperate this into two articles? Fitz05 21:50, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Would be very good indeed.  At the very least, headers should split them apart.  Goldfritha 21:59, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions 

message: If nobody has any issues with it, I'd like to merge Rescued dog into this article, and give it a general rewrite into something far more proper and wikipedian.
If anyone wants to suggest any sources on the topic, I would welcome them. You can check my progress at my Sandbox. Jesse Groppi (talk) 23:55, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been a year or so but I've now merged them. Anna talk 20:00, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge and rewrite 

message: I propose that this article be moved into a new dog-specific section of pet adoption. Much of the content of pet adoption is generic and applicable to dogs as well as other animals. A new section created from this article could then provide information specific to dog adoption. The size of this entire article is small enough to be suitable for a single section within another article, and the added content would improve the quality of pet adoption.  After the merger, this page would become a redirect to the new dog-specific section. Waz8:T-C-E 02:47, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 13:36, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Subaru Loyale

message: Could this page at least show a Loyale photo, and not the DL with four headlights? 
I shamefully cannot explain the differences enough for the GL/DL "fanclub" that wrote this article. I have had both. I am my car's only mechanic. They are quite different in many places. It would make the difference factually if written. I have attempted it more than once, and it is disturbing, the changes made by this biased writer.3rd strike, I am out.I don't even want to list it all again. The Loyale was not just a demise of a model. Subaru really did make improvements for the last four year run of the driveline and body being shrugged off as a GL/DL clone. Biased articles is not what Wikipedia is about. Any suggestions on how to make an accurate list of importance? 
Any authority here? I am done quibbling with this anonymous deleter...
[Image:http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/340/crop6ka1.jpg]
~soob792~ 01:31, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences Undocumented
Talk:Lists of active separatist movements/Archive 1

message: Questions about adding peoples to this list:
#Puerto Ricans?
#Formosans?
#Samoans who live in American Samoa?
#Marshall Islanders?
#all the Native American nations?
RickK 03:04, 30 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect that several of the listed nations with pro-independence movements really do not have pro-independence parties making more than 5% of the vote (I reckon it is the case for Brittany and Savoy). Should we remove them? David.Monniaux 08:23, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  If they fit the definition of the word nation, consider themselves as such, and do not self-govern (which is obviously the case if they are not independent), than there is no reason for them not to be in the list. However, we should be warry of listing nations we no nothing about. How many Marshall Islanders did you meet in your life? Can you really be sure that they see themselves as distinct from the other cultures in the world? Mathieugp 03:27, 30 Jan 2004 (UTC)

text: Because nobody added them in yet. Mathieugp 03:50, 30 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: But Adam said they shouldn't be here.  RickK 03:54, 30 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Puerto Ricans, Formosans, Samoans, Marshall Islanders, Native American nations

message: So, List of nationalist movements? The nationalist movements are typically either autonomist or separatist, violent or non-violent. There is also past and present I guess.
We could have something like that:
Region or people in such country.
There is already the beginning of such a list in the article on Separatism. 
I found these links on the net:
* Homeland movements worldwide (Looks incomplete)
* Separatist and Independence Movements (Looks outdated)
UPDATE:
* eLandnet (Very complete)
* Movements for National, Ethnic Liberation or Regional Autonomy (Leftist)
Mathieugp 19:08, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: A New Start?

message: Please take note of the new creation List of flags of nations not fully sovereign that may have relevancy here. --Jiang 22:26, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of flags of nations not fully sovereign]] 

message: Would anyone object to removing the empty continental sections? Empty sections is not the custom on Wikipedia: usually, articles should present a more finished aspect (not in the sense of definitive, of course). We could then create again these sections when one adds movements for them. What do you think? --Liberlogos 08:07, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree very much. I found it offensive for my own country's bit - The U.K. - It looks as if someone's claiming it's natural for every part of the country to want to start their own separatist/terrorist movement.WikiUser 21:08, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Empty sections
Talk:Argo (crater)

message: Just to clear this up, while typing this article from campus, the internet crashes, logging me out. I forget to log back in, only to find that it crashes again. I come back a third time, and find the article was created. But I was logged out, as I was using a school computer. So if anyone has questions about this article, I am the one to talk to, and no, I'm not trying to create sock-puppets either. Riffsyphon1024 18:30, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: I am the creator of the article

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 23:04, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Arago (Martian crater) →  – JPL refers to this crater as "Argo": 1, 2 DmitTrix (talk) 18:03, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Arago is a completely different crater. The redirect must be deleted. Stas (talk) 08:29, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Different craters (note: Arago vs. Argo):
* redirect , , with secondary (double) redirect , and
* article  or  (unofficial; and also listed in )
are now separated from each other.
So rather than the proposed deletion (above), both craters do exist with their corresponding redirects (on wikipedia) separately, despite their similar name. For consistency, I just requested to swap  with , see my move request. Rfassbind – talk 08:42, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resolve confusion
Talk:Your Cheatin' Heart

message: The user Jgm has demanded that I have no right to edit this page and the page 'Superstition' on the grounds that I have no right to edit the article but he does. Users please note that this is not true; I have the equal 'right' to edit pages that everyone else in the world-public do. I do not understand why he makes this bizzare demand but from 7 months experience I have found that if I do not obey such demands I am illegally blocked and experience jeering bullying from people working in packs who say that they abuse me because it "is such fun". (See Jimmy Wales post on The Wikipedia Foundation's mailing list.)
This is causing a serious downer on my health and so I am reluctantly for the present obeying the demand that I do not edit these two articles I started in response to a request for them on the 'requests' page. I have requested that userJgm go to a mediation complaint with me to stop this discrimination against me on the wikipedia.WikiUser 18:37, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Users of goodwill please note
Talk:Lagrange multiplier

message: Hi, 
I just changed looking for an extremum of g to looking for an extremum of h although I'm not absolutely sure. But I think it is the right term.
:Thanks for catching that; that occurrence of g seems to have been missed when the notation was changed in December.--Steuard 20:51, Jan 28, 2005 (UTC)
:Strictly looking for an extremum of h(\vec x, \vec \lambda) also implies the original \vec g(\vec x) = \vec 0 via \frac{\partial \vec h}{\partial \vec \lambda} = \vec 0 . 84.160.236.56 19:29, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notation change 

message: Video 27.62.210.24 (talk) 15:48, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real analysis Lagrange multiplier method 

message: I guess that in the last equation in the Statement section, either the left- or the right-hand side should be negated, otherwise x* is not a solution. Should be: D f(x*) = -λ*ΤD g(x*). Павел Кыштымов (talk) 21:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong sign in the Statement section
Talk:Open Range (2003 film)

message: "because the camera spends time caressing the magnificent scenery of the West."
or
"and some find it refreshing to see a leading man get into a relationship with a woman who isn't young enough to be his daughter."
I concur with an earlier poster by saying this sounds more like a review than an article about the film.Dspserpico 04:15, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV?

message: More could be said about the climactic gunfight being more "realistic" in terms of time and place (a chaotic melee rather than the usual fast-draw at high noon).  I'm not sure what "visceral gunplay" is supposed to mean, unless its a euphamistic way of saying that people get their guts blown out. Cranston Lamont (talk) 21:38, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Gunfight

message: This section appears to be lifted verbatim from the Open Range Production Details at madeinatlantis.com.  As that is not a wikipedia mirror, I have removed the entire section.
Please be aware that you cannot copy things from other websites and paste them here unless they have the appropriate license.  Thanks, 72.42.181.162 (talk) 22:49, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: production notes section
Talk:Thomas Holdup Stevens

message: Year of birth seems wrong. // Rudolf 1922 21:21, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Polaris (American band)

message: Anyone up to the task? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.185.57.166 (talk) 05:04, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone really needs to expand this page 

message: The page Hey Sandy redirects to here. However, there are two songs called "Hey Sandy," both possible about Kent State. The other song is by Harvey Andrews. -67.177.224.121 (talk) 05:03, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Hey Sandy 

message: Someone said on TV Tropes that NintendoCapriSun is a member of Polaris. Any proof? AmericanLeMans (talk) 20:45, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  NintendoCapriSun
Talk:Scottie Wilson

message: I'm not 100% on the date and place of his birth. I've seen many conflicting dates and locations so I just went with the most recurring ones. If anyone knows better, please update. --Clngre 21:41, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just saying the link to Small gallery of his works is a deadlink & not sure how to tag it. Manytexts (talk) 04:08, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  dead link 
Talk:Baptist Missionary Association of America

message: The statement that "Foreign countries with BMAA (meaning Baptist Missionary Association of America, rlv) churches generally have a national association in their respective country" may appear contradictory, but if they are in fact part of the association under discussion in this article, then they, though in another country, are members of the BMAA (Baptist Missionary Association of America). - Rlvaughn 21:57, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Autocar (magazine)

message: Should this article be moved to Autocar, which is the proper name of the magazine? SamH|Talk 21:54, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: See auto motor und sport. – wbm1058 (talk) 02:19, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to Autocar?

message: i created a disambiguation page Autocar (disambiguation) for autocar to honour the old word for "automobile". if it's of any use, please implement it here. i'm from the german wikipedia and won't go any further here ;-) Maximilian 23:26, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autocar (disambiguation) 
Talk:Bell test

message: *The text added in this edit at 17:24, 9 August 2017‎ was developed in and copied from User:InformationvsInjustice/sandbox. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: History note

message: Last november, the Institute of Photonic Sciences in Barcelona performed a Bell test experiment with random input generated through volunteers through internet , , with "preliminary results confirming violations of Bell’s inequality, and thus refuting Einstein". May someone knowledgeable add it to the article? Diego (talk) 17:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding the BIG Bell test to the article 

message: Hi guys, thanks for your contributions!  I have written a new lede to the article which I feel is more accessible to a lay reader along with a new Overview section.
Please see them here and give me any feedback you see fit.  Thanks.  Informata ob Iniquitatum (talk) 04:40, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's give it a shot (bearing in mind that we have a whole other article on Bell's theorem with lots of details that wouldn't fit into an overview here). XOR'easter (talk) 17:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed new lede and new "Overview" section
Talk:Gackt

message: Hi, the article at Japanese Wikipedia is of a very poor quality with many editorial problems for years. It has very good pageviews and sometimes extraordinary pageviews statistics. It needs a new revision comparable to the quality and content here at English Wikipedia. Hence it is needed someone or group of editors willing to cooperate to do WP:TRANSLATEUS of the article on English Wikipedia in the form which can be found at User:Miki Filigranski/sandbox (done with mechanic translation using Google Translate, is not of good enough quality for Japanese Wikipedia standard; for translation editing you can use the same sandbox; when saving the edit on Japanese Wikipedia in the edit summary must be provided URL link to English Wikipedia article due to copyrights as said at WP:TRANSLATEUS).  thank you in advance. Miki Filigranski (talk) 15:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of English Wikipedia to Japanese Wikipedia
Wikipedia talk:List of countries by coverage

message: Not at present included in the "United Kingdom" count. Next time?? Robin Patterson 23:32, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: England, Scotland, Wales

message: There is an overall reduction in the number of hits for most countries since the page was first set up.  Is the Google figure inaccurate? Rather than using Google is there a way of using the Wikipedia database directly for the number of hits?  Alan Liefting 20:55, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reduction in number of hits 

message: what is wrong with the figures? All the results are in the thousands or millions - United States from the link given gets 26.9 million, not 904! -- Astrokey44|talk 01:05, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Wikipedia has grown in the last year. Who'd have thought that would happen? I'm nominating this page for deletion as it is so out of date and unmaintainable.-gadfium 05:55, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It may be unmaintainable but it is possible to keep this page up to date by some committed users. --Siva1979Talk to me 23:19, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  figures
Talk:Black Widow

message: Looking at what links here, "Black Widow" links to a good many different things.  I made this page in response to a page about 1987 referring to the movie, which I have never watched.  However, the article is a substub (and would make the B-movie bandit proud), referes to a lot of things besides this old movie, and definitely needs to be expanded.  Samboy 22:51, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now expanded it a little; there are three different references to "Black Widow", each with a different meaning.  This page may eventually become a disambiguation page.  Until then, we have this "red link disambiguation" page, warning people who want to make a longer page on the movie or what not that the term means a lot of things.  Samboy 00:21, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different topics 

message: I know gossip blogs aren't enough to go on, but its a start. http://www.bastardly.com/2008-rihanna-bets-106-park-0620 Can't be the 2007 film, that's a casting detail, posted in 2008. 86.139.47.135 (talk) 14:38, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  new film? 

message: Ad something about button spiders. Common in South Africa. I would also like it if you could insert pictures of Black Widow eggs. Have a look at the article regarding Button spiders on wiki. They have a few pictures that include eggs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.160.124.40 (talk) 10:24, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Button spiders 

message: Hi, I just edited the page to list with three Latrodectus species with the common name "_____ black widow". I thought it would help because people will be looking for one of these three species based on their location or be interested in all three.
I Forgot to sign. Weebro55 (talk) 05:02, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  List Genus and three species? 

message: Isn't there a mixed drink called a "Black Widow?": some combo of Drambuie & whiskey? 138.162.128.54 (talk) 15:03, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cocktail
Talk:Venetia Stanley

message: I wrote this article about five years ago, and I agree with the notations on it: it needs in-line citations and has too much personal reflection (that is, while I know the facts to be accurate and supportable, I agree that it doesn't sound as neutral as it should). I'll try to work up a new list of cited works, at the very least, but it could be a few months. 24.145.132.195 (talk) 20:34, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent Developments