lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ozzie Nelson

message: I edited the reference to Ozzie becoming the youngest Eagle Scout because the Boy Scouts do not keep records of Eagle Scout's ages.  Do a Google search on "Younges Eagle Scout" and you find that quite a few people have claimed this.  But the BSA can't verify it.
I'm sure that Ozzie was a Scout, and was a young Eagle Scout, but there is no way to verify that he was the youngest.
Finbar 00:31, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Eagle Scout 

message: He died fairly young from cancer so I was just wondering. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.206.165.25 (talk) 06:15, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 69 was not "fairly young" back then, and the vast majority of cancer deaths are not smoking-related. NellieBly (talk) 18:34, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Was he smoker?
Talk:Red-shouldered macaw

message: I skimmed the wikification guide, and still don't know what I need to do to wikify this page.  I'd appreciate it if someone could point me to the appropriate information.  Thanks. Evenprime 00:37, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks pretty good to me, but I just found Wiki and started my first bird page. Psittacini (I used to have a Jardine's) I put the links and pic up first, and now will start writing. I will add to your fine page, as I now have a Noble. You can see him here. Emmy You might post to the parrot or bird talk page, where you'll get a lot more input than here. You have a cute Hahn's too. TheBirdMan 11:10, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Albert Crocker

message: Anyone doing cleanup should try to link this article to Crocker Motorcycles. Quale 00:45, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Crocker Motorcycles]] 

message: I doubt that the  and  tags are an improvement without any comment as to why the article (in somebody's opinion) is sub-standard.
Unless there's at least some discussion here supporting these tags, I think we should simply remove them. Andrewa 19:45, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's faults seem obvious and I'm working on a rewrite.Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 19:13, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup etc
Template talk:Maryland-road-stub

message: The capatalization is wrong, since "Maryland state highway" by itself is not a proper noun (since the term doesn't refer to a specific highway), the text should read "This article relating to Maryland state highways is a stub. Please help Wikipedia by expanding it".  Also the name of the template should be "Maryland-state-highway-stub" since I'm pretty sure the word stub isn't capatalized in most stubs.  And also, just to clarify things, "Maryland state highway" is written like that but "Maryland State Highway 2" for example has the words State and Highway capatalized since it refers to a specific highway.  I wasn't sure how it should be capatalized at first but I got it now, so I hope that helps.
:Please see Talk:List of California State Routes/Archive2 for a similar discussion. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs - count) 01:17, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalization
Talk:Alfred Mosher Butts

message: The invention date does not match with the Scrabble article.  Research should be done to discover which is the correct date.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.241.79.49 (talk • contribs) 01:00, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Matches date on the Scrabble wiki-page. - Gdavidp 08:52, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It does not even say his birth date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.80.177.50 (talk • contribs) 16:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It does now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Earthlyreason (talk • contribs) 01:23, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not enough information

message: This article should not go into detail of the invention of Scrabble, or of Lexico, which are covered on their respective pages. We need to thin this part out, and focus on the man. Earthlyreason (talk) 01:26, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Invention of Scrabble

message: Since it is well known that Butts worked as an architect, should he not be added to the "American architects" category? ACEOREVIVED (talk) 21:49, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Meteor sandwich yum (talk) 00:33, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Entry in American architects

message: I'm a bit baffled by this: "scrabble" is a perfectly ordinary word -- if you drop pieces of a jigsaw puzzle, you scrabble around under the table looking for them. But I am old an English: are there really English varieties in which this is not known? For the moment I will remove the "explanation" involving Dutch; Scrabble includes a more reasoned phrasing - "...a real word which means 'to scratch frantically'" - and I could add this in if I can be persuaded that it is necessary. Imaginatorium (talk) 12:20, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology of "scrabble"
Talk:Oyama

message: I've changed this page to a dab page from a redirect to Oyama, Tochigi. If there are any objections, please let me know. We can optionally move the dab to Oyama (disambiguation) and continue to use this as a redirect to the Japanese city, though I don't think that would be a good solution. Mindmatrix 01:03, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Peter Christen Asbjornsen

message: Should not be merged, as they are two distinct persons. 
See Talk:J%C3%B8rgen_Moe. bjelleklang 01:24, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, sorry, my bad...thought it was a merge with P.C. Asbjørnsen and J.Moe...thanks for noticing! bjelleklang 00:27, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

message: Today. bjelleklang 14:58, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaned up, and rewrote parts of the article
Talk:Peace of Callias

message: Fornara 95  contains all the relevant ancient sources on this topic.  For discussion see Meiggs' chapter on this topic in Athenian Empire (1972) as well as Badian From Plataea to Potidaea (1993) chapter 1.  This article should be aware that there is  no scholarly consensus on this topic.  No peaces, one peace or two peaces are all arguable stances to have.  The article should give reference to the main primary evidence and outline possible solutions.  Since there is no agreement on whether there was a peace, the 'effects of the peace' content (towards the end of the current text) should be presented rather as 'developments a peace with Persia could be used to explain'.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.43.239 (talk) 23:57, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: references and article structure
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-10-10/ArbCom election

message: Hi,
If it's of any help, for further information on some of my more mentioned criticisms from March 2004, see , , , and . While I was around 7 points from winning in the last election in December, these links feature the two runner-ups in that election alluding to my statements and touching on the same line of criticism. 172 | Talk 01:43, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Which issues do you think I missed? Thanks for the input. Flcelloguy | A  note? | Desk |  WS  22:19, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In the early days, it focused around the fact that they were so slow and were perceived as being relatively toothless. After the changing of the guard in January, there was a period where we were copping some flak for making decisions too quickly, and then as people burned out, we were again being criticised for being very much too slow. There's also been criticism of being involved in cases between good editors (the Jguk debacle comes to mind). But when the focus is instead on whingeing from all of two users who've got axes to grind after themselves being sanctioned (in decisions that were widely supported by the community), then it just comes across as bad journalism. Ambi 04:32, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I am inclined to agree - I think it's particularly odd that Mirv's criticisms about the arbcom aren't mentioned anywhere in the article. If you want someone making arguments similar to EK and Ril that is unsanctioned, did well in the last arbcom election, and has been very vocal, I'd turn to him. Snowspinner 22:13, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

text: Wow. Three sanctioned users. Still doesn't equal "the community". Ambi 01:20, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

text: That you mention their opinion is not my beef. That you refer to it as being held by "many" and go into more detail about it than other is patently misleading. Upon reading this article, one would assume that there'd been widespread controversy about this - not the complaints of two or three users with a grudge after themselves being sanctioned. Ambi 06:24, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops, "some" would probably have been a better term to use, and I apologize. Also, I've already said that I probably could have expanded some of the earlier criticisms, but I didn't intentionally try to do any of this. I guess the point is kind of moot now, but thanks for the input. :-) Flcelloguy | A  note? | Desk |  WS  19:31, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-10-10/Candidate statements

message: "172 cited erroneously that the The Signpost would be including information in this issue about candidate statements."
I don't know if this is correct. I was aware that the edition on the 3rd was "About ArbCom" and then the 10th would feature "Criticism of ArbCom." However, I did not see any information stating that candidates were specifically instructed not to post candidate statements. I am going to take the liberty to remove the comment. Of course, since it's in your namespace, you're of liberty to revert my feedback and edits. 172 | Talk 01:52, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not going to revert your changes, but let me be clear that I was in no way trying to portray you or any other candidates in a negative light. The Wikipedia Signpost strives to be nonbiased, and we value your opinions. I was just trying to convey why you originally created the page — you said on the talk page that the Signpost was doing an article on the candidate statements this week, and that's why you created the page. I'm not saying it was bad (or good), I'm just trying to report the facts as they are. However, I don't mind the changes. In the future, though, could you either let me know beforehand on my talk page if you are going to alter an "unpublished" article so I'm aware of it? Many thanks. Flcelloguy | A  note? | Desk |  WS  22:16, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Shitao

message: Dates are different from the version in the Chinese wikipedia.--Confuzion 01:55, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Date Discrepancy

message: The two are one and the same person. The information there should be merged into here. It would also be good to list Shitao's monastic name "Tao Chi" to prevent the confusion. -- Sjschen (talk) 16:22, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from Tao Chi
Talk:Huang Binhong

message: Date discrepancy with the Chinese wikipedia version--Confuzion 02:03, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I fixed that. Although some sites did have him born in 1864, Hong Kong's did not so I made the change.--T. Anthony 05:52, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Date discrepancy
Talk:Battle of Komaki

message: Is there any reason this article isn't combined with Battle of Nagakute? Both the Japanese and Chinese versions of this article have to two combined. Douggers 11:42, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I guess there's no reason to keep them separated, other than the fact that they were separate battles. They are surely closely enough related that the narrative could be told in a single article. Would you be interested in doing the merge? LordAmeth 22:11, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I started working on Battle of Komaki and Nagakute. I'm just doing a quick translation of the Japanese page, after which I'll formally merge the other two articles with it. Douggers 03:02, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Battle of Komaki and Nagakute
Talk:Ollie Olsen

message: This article has been cut down anonymously a few times, deleting NPOV background data (such as real name Ian Olsen). The anon. prefers to list recent projects only, suggesting possible self-promotion. I suggest reinstatement of much of the previously deleted information.  Design 02:21, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cut down, why?

message: The External links section was sorely in need of expansion, as it only included a single link for a related artist—it was not even for the artist who is the subject of the article. I have inserted three additional links, as Olsen is a prolific, influential artist with an extensive history.--Soulparadox (talk) 08:17, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links section 

message: The article's had substantial rewriting by experienced Wikipedians who know the area. Do we still need the COI tag? - David Gerard (talk) 18:12, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI issue current? 

message: Ollie's legal name is: Ollie Jngbert Christian Olsen.
It was legally changed in about 1990.
Any edits people have made in the past to this page in regards to Ollie's name, will have been because they know this to be factual.
Ollie released Whirlywirld material under the name: "Ian" but obviously Ollie has since changed their name.
Most material released by Olsen is under the name: Ollie Olsen. 
Ollie was born in Melbourne, Australia not Norway. Ollie had a parent of Norwegian descent, since deceased.
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaynebeatrix (talk • contribs) 23:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The 2nd Edn of Ian McFarlane's encyclopaedia confirms the usage of Ian "Ollie" Olsen. It updates information about his year of birth, place of birth and descent. It is now included in the article. A ref from Australasian Performing Rights Association (APRA) gives his full name as Olsen, Ollie Jngbert Christian and this is returned to the article.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 23:01, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ollie's correct and legal name and place of birth
Portal talk:Architecture

message: The Selected general articles section displays the topics from the Subtopics section. If any off-topic subjects show up in the slideshow, removing them from the Subtopics section will fix the problem.
The subtopics section was generated via a search, and then copy/pasted in. I've tried to delete all the links to off-topic subjects, such as computer architectures, software architectures, biological structures, and so on. If you come across any, please remove them.
Thank you.    — The Transhumanist    19:37, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible off-topic subjects in ''Selected general articles'' and the ''Subtopics'' section 

message: The following updates have been performed on the portal in 2022. North America1000 02:54, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2022 updates 

message: Hi, what are the notability guidelines for architects? Tzahy (talk) 07:32, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The usual rules for creative professionals apply: see WP:ARCHITECT. Certes (talk) 15:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Certes, thank you very much. Tzahy (talk) 16:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Guidlines
Talk:Mutiny Acts

message: This needs much more than just one sentence such as who, what, when, where. Bulimiccrust 02:25, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to be a reference to a British law about colonial America (see Quartering Act, the page that links here), but I don't know enough about that period to say what, if anything, should go in this article. Haeleth 22:10, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Actus reus

message: This article should have a literal translation of actus reus
It does: it is the Latin for "guilty act". David91 03:03, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Given a B as not many links included as readablility and detail could be imporved. High importance, cournerstone of criminal law. Bamkin 19:47, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First Assesment

message: The following appears:
Commentator Dennis Baker asserts: "Although lawyers find the expression actus reus convenient, it is misleading in one respect. It means not just the criminal act but all the external elements of an offence. Ordinarily, there is a criminal act, which is what makes the term actus reus generally acceptable. But there are crimes without an act, and therefore without an actus reus in the obvious meaning of that term. The expression “conduct” is more satisfactory, because wider; it covers not only an act but an omission, and (by a stretch) a bodily position. The conduct must sometimes take place in legally relevant circumstances. The relevant circumstances might include consent in the case of rape. The act of sexual intercourse becomes a wrongful act only if it is committed in circumstances where the vagina does not consent. Other crimes require the act to produce a legally forbidden consequence. Such crimes are called result crimes. ... All that can truly be said, without exception, is that a crime requires some external state of affairs that can be categorized as criminal. What goes on inside a person’s head is never enough in itself to constitute a crime, even though it might be proved by a confession that is fully believed to be genuine
Clearly a vagina can't consent (since it is a part of the body). This quote is rather long (possibly too long to be defensible in copyright law in England and Wales anyway). I am not sure it is helpful to have such a long quote in this context either. However, I don't have the source to check the "vagina" point. Can someone who does please check that is there or amend. Francis Davey (talk) 17:03, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Vagina and consent

message: Why is there no table of contents for this talk page? Seraphim System (talk) 01:22, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The table of contents only appears (automatically) once there are 4 section headings on the talk page. See H:TOC for more explanation. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 01:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Table of Contents

message: I added a Globalize tag because this concept is not just relevant to United States or English law, but is relevant in jurisdictions around the world. The article should explore how this concept is relevant in other countries, and give relevant explanations and examples, too. This would make for a globally relevant article. There should be examples from all the criminal jurisdictions mentioned in the lead section. The lead section should provide an accessible overview of the topic, so if something is mentioned in the lead section it should be covered in the body of the article, too. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 01:05, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize tag
Talk:Mostaccioli

message: This seems to be a recipe rather than an explanation of what mostaccioli is, which if I recall, isn't really wikipedia's sort of thing... maybe one of the sister projects?  Not sure.  Someone that knows more than n00bish me needs to weigh-in I think, but it really does need an explanation of what it is at least.  Wish I could write it!  -Graptor
:Addressed. See edit summary. --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 16:19, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Guitar Wolf

message: Um, neo-renaissance?  Isn't that redundant?
:Well, more like the opposite of redundant. I'd call it more paradoxical. But point taken, it's a stupid neologism. wilhelm 04:48, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The list of cover versions says that Guitar Wolf has recorded Motörheads Ace of Spades. I am unable to find any confirmation of this anywhere. However, they did record Link Wray's song of the same title, as the list also states. Is it possible, that this is a mistake? Can anyone confirm, that Guitar Wolf recorded Motörhead's Ace of Spades? SkaryMonk (talk) 09:33, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not Ace of Spade by MH but by Link Wray. Wuttgenstein (talk) 14:52, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Ace of Spades
Talk:Potemkin (Guilty Gear)

message: 69.141.126.17, please stop adding all that "how-to" stuff. Non-players wouldn't understand most of it and/or wouldn't care, and Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a FAQ page. --Yar Kramer 02:53, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

message: I just recently discovered this, but Potemkin has a pair of attacks, Heat Knuckle/Extend which is a lot like Erupting God Finger from G Gundam, and his Overdrive "Gigantor Bullet" is EXACTLY like GaoGaiGar's Hell & Heaven technique found in the series.  Even the glowing hands and movement stance are identical!
:Entirely possible, but at this stage, don't present it as more than it is: Speculation. Digital Watches 03:18, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know it's kind of an old subject, but Gigantor Bullet really is identical to Hell And Heaven. Opening pose, color of glowing hands, attack pose, attack mode, opening with an energy attack that paralyzes the opponent, you name it. If that's a coincidence, it's a hellishly unlikely one (about as unlikely as "Burly Heart" being so similar to "Kashimir" by accident). The G-Gundam thing is somewhat more specious, but "Heat Extend" is pretty darn close to Domon Kasshu's "Heat End" battlecry, and they both yell it out while peforming a followup attack that involves crushing an opponent in a flaming hand. Just throwing that out there. ShaleZero 18:06, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Connection of Potemkin to G Gundam and GaoGaiGar 

message: 68.100.222.184, If you think that "Burly Heart" bears any resemblance to "Spiel Mit Mier", you're crazy.  If anything, it's based on a combination of Led Zeppelin's "Kashmir" and Pantera's "A New Level".--68.100.222.184 00:23, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing a musical Reference 

message: Yet another reference and nod to Anime, Potemkin has a move and quote "Hontou wa hatchi no hissatsu waza! [Submission Technique #48!]" this is a nod to Kinnikuman's infamous Kinnikuman Buster.  Just thought I'd add it. Mimeblade 17:44, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection to Kinnikuman.
Talk:Landwind X6

message: I removed a meaningless POV bit, and added information from Dutch engingeering magazine De Ingenieur, number 19, dated 28-10-2005, page 19. Unfortunately it's not as easy to find information about this in English, so if anyone finds a good source, please add it to the external links and improve the article with it. Robin F. 12:29, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improved Controversy section