Talk:Hagley

message: The following sentence in the article doesn't make sense:
:"Ten pupils and a teacher died at the scene of the crash near Warwick, some 30 miles from Hagley, and the final death toll rose to 12 when two more pupils died in hospital as a result of their injuries."
Surely, the death toll would have rose to 13 if two pupils died in hospital following the death of eleven at the scene of the crash? Can someone correct this information, or if it is just a misunderstanding of the material then make this clearer. - Erebus555 (talk) 17:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This kind of information is probably not  of encyclopedic value and should possibly  be cut from the article.--Kudpung (talk) 06:20, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The math has been rectified and a link created to the main article; I see now that  there was a debate concerning AfD for the main article.There was no  consensus and the article was kept.--Kudpung (talk) 13:21, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion

message: Just adding names of people who live or have lived in Hagley is a variety of trivia, which is now discouraged in WP.  If a person is notable enough to warrant an article being written about them, they are notable enough to appear, but I would suggest, not otherwise.  Peterkingiron (talk) 23:00, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think probably this section is now limited to people who have an article about them in  the WP. If  not, or if any  others get  added, be bold and delete.--Kudpung (talk) 06:21, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm  a great  fan  of Led Zep but  I've finally  cut Bonham out of this list. Apart  from  the constant  vandalism,  I have been unable to  find  any  proof that  he ever lived in  Hagley, although  he apparently came from  nearby  Redditch.--Kudpung (talk) 07:56, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I would suggest that the similar criteria to disambiguation pages should apply, namely that there must be a bluelink to something.Peterkingiron (talk) 16:06, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Famous Residents

message: There are a lot of issues in  this article that raise eyebrows. Tradgedies and other sensational  local  events are trivia and are not really  of encyclopedic value. I'm suggesting  they be cut  out. The rest   of the article is rather disjointed and needs restructuring - or better still, rewriting by  one copyeditor with  local knowledge.--Kudpung (talk) 06:25, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've since made an attempt at a partial clean up. I've greatly reworked the section  on  tragedies in case it is decided to keep it. However, although these events are genuine, it is not proving  easy to find sources that can be cited. The Worcs project is aware of this and working  on  it. --Kudpung (talk) 07:31, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Gough and minibus cases were widely reported in local newspapers at the time.  However, the detail on the Susan Renhard case seems excessive to me.  While all murders are horrid, stranger murders (such as Stuart Gough) are highly newsworthy and notorious, whereas the murder of one student by another is not.  Certainly if sources are not provided on the Rehand case (just added to the article), that section should be severely pruned.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now flagged some of the areas for attention - they may  actually  be OR or POV). On  Peter's recommendation  I've pruned the tragedies section (but  this may  still not be enough), but  I  have been unable to find any  sources to  the Susan Renhard affair which still  remains completely  unsourced. An appeal  to  the original creator (anonymous) would probably be  ineffective.--Kudpung (talk) 02:49, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hagley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716063720/http://worcestershire.whub.org.uk/cms/pdf/Census_Parish_Hagley.pdf to http://worcestershire.whub.org.uk/cms/pdf/Census_Parish_Hagley.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:56, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified