Talk:Human herpesvirus 6

message: I see that HHV-6 is implicated with many other illnesses. Is it worth linking to those pages where relevant when they occur? Cross linking would be helpful. The section on MS is very nicely done. I learned a lot :) Increasing overall meshing to help folks find answers is what wikipedia is about, right? Shtanto (talk) 15:17, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well thank you, that is great to hear. I did a research project on HHV-6 and incorporated my findings into this Wikipedia entry. I found the MS associations to be particularly intriguing. Vokesk (talk) 20:06, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

text: And yes, please increase linking to and from this hhv-6 article wherever applicable. Thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:404:C600:E110:68E5:D25F:8D3D:7F79 (talk) 18:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  HHV6 article cross-referencing with other wiki articles 

message: My MS initially presented as a case of optic neuritis. Many other MSers have had similar onset. Rather points the finger at HHV-6a.
Eyewitness testimony carries a lot of weight in courts of law. Funny to think personal testimonials aren't similarly treated in medicine. Statistics appear to be more trustworthy than the human datapoints that made them possible.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shtanto (talk • contribs) 14:32, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Very interesting, hope all is well. Vokesk (talk) 20:06, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Optic Neuritus 

message: I was reading the article on LDN recently. Although a lot of its claims are unfounded (still testimonially true) I noticed LDN treats what HHV causes. Could it just be an interesting coincidence? No studies yet, but I'd be surprised if we don't see one someday. To the people who have a HHV related condition, read the LDN page and draw your own conclusions.Shtanto (talk) 22:34, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll try to research this myself. LeadSongDog (talk) has previously pointed out that I am only a sample size of 1, but I have to start somewhere. Shtanto (talk) 13:29, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does LDN act on HHV? 

message: Split Human herpesvirus 6 to Human herpesvirus 6A and Human herpesvirus 6B?
As the article states:
HHV-6A and HHV-6B were classified as distinct species in 2012.Adams MJ, Carstens EB. 2012. Ratification vote on taxonomic proposals to the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (2012). Arch Virol. doi 10.1007/s00705-012-1299-6
There seems to be emerging data about the differences in the diseases these two cause.
Should we split the article? Tony Mach (talk) 19:18, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, splitting may currently be unwarranted. The literature, especially dated articles, often do not distinguish strains. However, I feel that a split may become necessary during the next decade as we develop our understanding of HHV-6. Vokesk (talk) 23:24, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  In that case, I will remove the tags for now. Op47 (talk) 13:45, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Human herpesvirus 6. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070208065445/http://www.wisconsinlab.com/hiv.htm to http://www.wisconsinlab.com/hiv.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:06, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified