lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Games 100

message: Hi all.  Article is started ... I think it would be interesting if we found the winners for each year and put them in a table.  Monkeyman 01:36, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Lacking the actual issue corresponding to this award I'm not 100% sure which version of the game was awarded. The date is rather mysterious as no version of Civilization that I know of was released in 1992, 1993, or 1994, but presumably we can ignore everything 1995 and beyond. This leaves us with a few options. The game could be:
*Civilization (board game) - the 1980 board game
*Civilization (video game) - the 1991 video game
*Advanced Civilization - the 1991 expansion to the 1980 board game
Of these three I think it is most likely that the award was for one of the 1991 games because they are closer to the date of the award, and of those two, I think it's more likely that Civilization (video game) is the award winner since its name is a better match. All of this is just speculation, though, and needs to be verified by a proper source (namely the actual magazine issue). -Thibbs (talk) 15:56, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this url may resolve the question. Apparently in 1993 there were a number of nominees (including the 1981-era Axis and Allies) that were not from that year. Furthermore, the 1980 board game was definitely at least a nominee in 1993 according to that link (boardgamegeek). So given this info I'll relink that title to the article on the 1980 board game. A proper ref is still needed here. -Thibbs (talk) 12:00, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  1993 award for ''Civilization'' 
Talk:Montrose (band)

message: I've heard that Sammy Hagar and Denny Carmassi recorded some demos together before they were in Montrose, but I don't know enough about this to feel comfortable putting that in the article. Gringo300 01:56, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Sammy Hagar and Denny Carmassi pre-Montrose?
Talk:Novation

message: This is a stub, not a dicdef - article needs much expansion, and there is much to be added. -- BD2412 talk 02:01, 2005 Jun 11 (UTC)
Novation is also a concept in civil law.
Eulen 01:05, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

message: see defn of novation here
http://www.pharmaceutical-journal.com/opinion/comment/the-reforms-of-pharmacy-in-england-are-novations-and-replacements/10040587.article
im new to this = forgive me if im breaking any protocols  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.110.162.61 (talk) 23:45, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  is this a new definition for novation
Talk:William McCoy (rum runner)

message: May the article should mention that there's a character based on him in Boardwalk Empire, English is my second language so I wouldn't be comfortable doing it myself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.226.26.114 (talk) 03:01, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boardwalk Empire 

message: If his name was William Frederick McCoy, where does William S. McCoy come from? --Big_iron (talk) 10:17, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: New to the page, good point.  I'll look it up.--Kenneth M Burke (talk) 16:40, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of article 

message: He was a smuggler, but was not connected with organized crime, and pretty much only used guns to fire warning shots to keep from being captured, so some might dispute the "gangster" category... AnonMoos (talk) 11:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "gangster" category
Talk:Strapping Young Lad (album)

message: Okay, so, the article "Relentess (song)" basically has the same information (or, at least information that could be placed under the song title on this page) and isn't all that necessary.  So deletion, I think, would be necessary here unless anyone had any objections. The Snake 06:45, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Relentless (song)
Talk:Choose Love (album)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Also a consensus for there being no primary topic, so the disambiguation page will be moved to the basename. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 17:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Choose Love →  – A comparison of the pageviews of Choose Love, Choose Love (organisation), and Choose Love (film) reveals that neither of the former two is the primary topic. In fact, the album—despite being the most easily encountered when using Wikipedia's search function—gets the least pageviews. The first page of a Google search for "choose love" is dominated by the film, with some mention of the organisation, and no mention of the album. The film's article seems to have stabilised at 250–500 pageviews per day, which may lead one to suggest that it is the primary topic, but considering that it is relatively new, I think that it will reach the other two articles' levels of pageviews over enough time. I have created this discussion to gain consensus that the album is not the primary topic, and to generate discussion about what  the primary topic. Right now, I'm leaning towards no primary topic, and renaming the disambiguation page to Choose Love. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 15:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 October 2023
Talk:Coat of arms of Dagestan

message: This should be deleted because it just redirects to Dagestan.
:This is no longer the case. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 10:05, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:All Souls Church, Langham Place

message: The staff section in this page is a year out of date, but as I work for all souls, I can't actually alter it. Someone else please.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.13.145.77 (talk) 15:41, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Outdated

message: * What I think should be changed: Update list of Churchwardens. Louise Gibson should be changed to Jo Richards.
* Why it should be changed: New churchwarden elected
* References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button): https://allsouls.org/Groups/132681/About_Us/Staff_and_Leadership/Staff_and_Leadership.aspx
Allsoulslanghamplace (talk) 16:29, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that looks OK.  I've made the change. Feline Hymnic (talk) 20:26, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update Churchwardens
Talk:Brittny Gastineau

message: her name is Brittny Gastineau
source: http://www.celebopedia.com/brittny-gastineau/
- Stoph 03:30, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: name

message: The article comes up under 1982 births yet the body states, 'Brittny Gastineau is an American born socialite, model and actress. Born on November 11, 1983...'
Which is it? Shaybear 02:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What is her age again?

message: *Gastineau has also begun doing promotional assignments for a third season of Gastineau Girls, which has switched from the E! Network to MTV. The shows' first MTV run is slated to premiere in early 2010, and production will end in 2009.
There's no inline source for this so I can't check it easily. But I don't understand how production ends before the premiere. Are they shooting the entire season before they air any of it? If so it would help to put those into chronological order.   Will Beback  talk   23:11, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this is wishful thinking more that verifiable fact. I didn't find anything other than forum posts expressing hope for season 3. Kevin (talk) 23:22, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case I'll just delete it. Once sources are found it can be re-added.   Will Beback  talk   06:07, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gastineau Girls 
Talk:Khải Định

message: doesn't sound all that neutral ... "In a manner fitting for a traitor, that is cowardly," etc.
:Unfortunately many of these articles seem to have been devastated by Vietnamese monarchists (or maybe just one) with an agenda to make the royals look as good as possible and the communists as bad as possible. Everyking 03:49, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There have been rumors that Bao Dai wasn't his child at all, but an adopted child.  Khai Dinh was rumored to be either impotent or homosexual, as he wore flamboyant clothes, preferred to be in the company of men more than women, and when he watches hat tuong, he made the men take the role of women. DHN (talk) 02:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rumors 

message: On the coins it was 啓定
Pyvanet (talk) 00:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  啟定 or 啓定 ? 

message: Given he's listed under three LGBT categories, and the only given source is a (now-dead but viewable archived) news site of unclear quality, shouldn't there be more added? Per the evident facts, he was married, and had a son who succeeded him. There must be books, scholarly research, etc, regarding whether or not he was homosexual, surely? If so, they want including, if not, maybe the categorization is precipitate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.200.175 (talk) 01:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Better/ more sources for LGBT categories etc
Talk:Paula Tsui

message: Someone inserted such an article, but the problem is that it is entirely in Chinese. As that page was listed at WP:PNT with no progress made in two weeks, I have redirected it here instead of prodding it as is usually the case. (I did that per WP:IAR.) However, I do not think a separate article is warranted at this point, so if anyone feels like translating the discography and including it here, then be my guest. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 23:38, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Paula Tsui discography]] 
Talk:James Kilgore

message: Not sure the proper way to do it, but if anybody is better than me at Wikipedia: basically all the previous edits from 98.155.163.122 should be reverted  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.21.186.227 (talk) 06:37, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: The opening sentence of the article, "James William Kilgore (born July 30, 1947) is an American research scholar, hired by his wife, at the University of Illinois' Center for African Studies in Champaign–Urbana," seems strange and unnatural to me. The fact that he was hired by his wife does not seem to be so important as to include it in such a prominent place, even if there was controversy over the circumstances of his hiring. As he is notable for reasons other than the circumstances of his hiring, I think this aside should be removed.  
NearNRiver (talk) 15:03, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hired by his wife" 

message: I'm going to be bold and remove the note in the infobox questioning Dr. Kilgore's PhD degree from Deakin and replace it with a reference to said PhD. Although Dr. Kilgore has lived a controversial life, and has spent time in prison for multiple crimes, there is no evidence supporting any insinuation that his PhD was earned in anything other than a legitimate manner. Per the policy on biographies of living persons a negative insinuation of this kind should be removed immediately unless there is evidence that the university itself has revoked the degree. No such evidence seems to exist: quite the contrary, there is a reference suggesting that the PhD was awarded legitimately which I will post. Dash77 (talk) 22:32, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  PhD degree from Deakin 

message: There are several unsourced quotes about his debut novel. All can be removed if not sourced.Parkwells (talk) 19:17, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced quotes about debut novel
Talk:Michael Bortin

message: On 25 May 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Michael Bortin for a record of the discussion. Rossami (talk) 04:02, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem with these pages is that the names at the SLA article are linked to here. I'm putting the redirects back and cutting the links at the SLA page.--Hjal 08:01, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Pastoral council

message: It seems clear from reading the two articles, and from my brief readings of the canon law involved, that the articles entitled Pastoral Council and Parish council (US Catholic Church) are discussing the same topic. They should be merged. Gentgeen (talk) 12:07, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Laurel Lodged (talk) 20:47, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Patricia Soltysik

message: It would probably be good to have a citation for the claim that someone became extremely promiscuous as a result of her political views.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.135.98.180 (talk) 05:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I removed it as unsubstantiated and NPOV
According to Jeffery Toobin's American Heiress, she changed her name legally to "Mizmoon" Soltysik.  Shouldn't that be the title of this page?  I was just reading Christopher Priest's wikipedia page, and that's not his birth name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.18.193.204 (talk) 13:46, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Éthiopiques

message: All of the individual Ethiopiques CDs could use their own articles (see WP:ALBUM). Sometime I'll try and write about about a few, myself. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 04:33, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's over a year later and I've made zero progress on that particular task. So much for that... -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 00:45, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree, I've partially reverted the paragraph in question. The details are probably better suited for separate articles about the individual CDs (and, as written, would need substantial attention in any case). -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 00:45, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:List of Major League Baseball players from South Korea

message: Just leaving a reminder to clean up the table a bit.. —Borgardetalk 10:10, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table clean up 

message: Maybe there should be a note about the names.  In general, Wikipedia  puts family names first; but here, the family names are last (not apparent, since the given names are not hyphenated).  I assume this is because they probably conform their names to North American use.211.225.33.104 (talk) 23:42, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names 

message: * Yes. This is just a list. All players have their pages themselves. Chinese characters are written in players' pages, respectively. Writing in the list like this is redundant. We should remove Chinese characters from the list. Sawol (talk) 01:28, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: To be fair, how about removing both Korean characters and Chinese characters? Excessive columns make the mobile view poor. Sawol (talk) 14:11, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I guess that can work.  Bladebuster700 (talk) 16:56, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survey
Talk:Johann Olav Koss

message: Tried to fix the link on the right side where the medals are listed. If you click on "10 000 meters" you will go to the 1500 meters, not the 10 000 meters.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.192.161 (talk) 07:28, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong link
Talk:Hawaiiana

message: There was a "Hawaiiana" department at the Hawaii Library as early as 1930. See "Mrs. Sutherland Named President" in the Honolulu Star-Bulletin, 3/27/1930, p. 8.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nupepa hawaii (talk • contribs) 07:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hawaiiana" is a much older term than 1948.
Talk:Australian anti-terrorism legislation, 2004

message: This article is very strong in its opposition to the Howard government's anti-terror laws. It needs to be looked over and NPOVed to give some quality info on these important laws. Harro5 05:38, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
The POV paragraphs were inserted by the LaRouchite editor Herschelkrustofsly aka Weed Harper, who has now been banned. I have deleted them. I'm not really sure what the point of this article now is. Perhaps it can be incorporated into a wider article on the Australian response to terrorism. Adam 07:11, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Office of Hawaiian Affairs

message: I think that it's a positive thing that there's currently about an equal amount of men and women currently serving on the Board of Trustees in OHA. I think that it's important that this trend continue as Native Hawaiian women sometimes might be a little unrepresented at times. Progress has no doubt been made in terms of Native Hawaiians looking for representation here in today's United States but it can't just stop there. Through studying various uprising groups it's clear that men have often lead the charge and have taken forefront for the movement. Although OHA is not necessarily a movement they are still the leaders for Native Hawaiians and are responsible for the growth and development of its people. It should be a point that gender inequality should not be one of the reasons that this organization or culture comes to a crossroads. Although very different it was sad to learn about how the Brown Berets, a Chicano movement in the 1960s, began to fall apart due to gender related issues in representation and treatment. Not saying that OHA would face these same kinds of problems but I also think that it's smart to acknowledge for the simple fact that we can continue to learn from the mistakes of others. Again, the movements and situations are completely different and in no way am I trying to compare the two in saying that OHA might or might not face these kinds of problems. I just think that it's a smart thing to consider when electing the Board of Trustees for OHA so that these problems never have to be an issue in the first place. Native Hawaiians have worked long and hard for representation and any efforts to defeat any kind of opposition or problem I think is beneficial no matter how big or small.TokoUso6Tree (talk) 23:28, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women in OHA 

message: The article says little about OHA's purpose and scope. Housing, agriculture,... Lfstevens (talk) 21:58, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purpose
Talk:Institution

message: The economics discussion about institutions looks inaccurate (or at least, old-fashioned) to me.  FWICT, institutions are mostly viewed as (Nash) equilibria in games, rather than the structure of the game itself.  That is, game theory analyses of institutions often attempt to demonstrate why a particular social structure is stable or self-enforcing.  Am I being biased here?  Is there anything I should read to get a more balanced view of modern economic thinking relating to institutions?
Obviously, if you want to understand the effects of an institution, rather than understand the institution itself, then you could take the institution as exogenous, and construct games in which the only possible actions are ones that follow the rules of the institution.
Any objections to a rewrite of the economics section along these lines?
--Clausen 05:54, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have done the rewrite of the economics section I proposed earlier.
--Clausen 11:01, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economics section rewrite 

message: The first few sentences excessively use phrases like “further” and “moreover” —which would normally seperate longer sentences or clauses— and are poorly written/hard to read overall. The lead section doesn’t provide a concise overview of what institutions are, but delves into the specifics of how certain scholars approach the topic. While such quotations might be useful, in this case, they veer off into an argument over whether or not institutions constitute forms of behaviour. This is an issue better left to the rest of the article. Yaguzi (talk) 03:08, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly written lead section 

message: What sticks.. 2600:1700:5B23:6240:B5D1:51F6:2694:D779 (talk) 20:54, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Government titles vS vehicle vin codeing 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :History of institutions and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 3#History of institutions until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 17:30, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "History of institutions" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:1952 Alberta general election

message: The party compostition listed on the Elections Alberta Website is wrong, the results were 52 Social Credit 4 Liberals, not 53 Social Credit 3 Liberals.
--Cloveious 06:15, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Canadian Action Party

message: http://www.scribd.com/doc/19070357/Wikipedia-Canadian-Action-Party-25-August-2009-201-am
* * *  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.55.11.34 (talk) 12:30, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed this ALL-CAPS comment from the article:
(THIS IS NOT THE NDP'S POSITION-- THIS IS A PARTISAN STATEMENT, NOT BASED ON FACT).
While I agree this section is currently under referenced and in its present form may not follow NPOV as well as it could, this discussion page is the spot for these types of comments, not the article itself.Garth of the Forest (talk) 18:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Various Party Positions with regard to the War of (aka "on") Terror

message: This party seems to have morphed into a fringe group with more and more loonies making the cut and most rational people deserting the ship. The belief in "alternative theories" to what really happenned on 9/11 is but one example. In fact they are really only now known as being a fringe party. Should not this stated and documented.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.67.154.249 (talk) 06:23, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riddled with Conspiracy Lunatics
Talk:Pine Point, Northwest Territories

message: I thought the population of Pine Point peaked around 1,800 or more in the mid 1980s. Perhaps checking with the Gov't of Canada census archives might help. - Walter Foddis
:It peaked at 1,915 in 1976. This is now included and referenced in the article. Hwy43 (talk) 04:21, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population peak 

message: Per WP:CCSG, three external links have been removed but they live on below. Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 04:20, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links removed 

message: The band PUP has a song about being born in pine point and how it had to be abandoned. Maybe this should be in the notable people section. DK1212 (talk) 11:22, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This was already covered in the article under history. I was looking in the wrong place. I am sorry. DK1212 (talk) 11:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pine Point by PUP
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Canberra/Suburbs

message: Added brownie points go to anyone who researches the area and puts in a section detailing the past aboriginal culture of the area.
Suggest this be rephrased! Pete 07:07, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: The template associated with the incomplete suburb articles was nominated for merger with Template:Canberra-stub or for deletion on June 19 at  Wikipedia:Stub_types_for_deletion--AYArktos 21:54, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In the debate it has been suggested to change the name of the category to :Category:Canberra suburb stubs. I would suport the rename.  Any comments?--AYArktos 01:51, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub template nomination for deletion