Talk:Metabolic network modelling

message: This article seems to be written in the form of a thesis rather than an encyclopedia article. I'd suggest deleting the conclusion and changing the introduction into an overview. Plynch22 (talk) 23:39, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 

message: This article provides a very limited and biased view of the topic. Metabolic network modeling is a much richer topic with a vast literature. The article describes only a very small part of this which is metabolic network reconstruction. This must be expanded  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.202.244 (talk) 06:54, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Limited view

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Metabolic network modelling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121027052729/http://genomebiology.com:80/2012/13/1/r6/ to http://genomebiology.com/2012/13/1/r6
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060218084611/http://www.expasy.org:80/enzyme/ to http://www.expasy.org/enzyme/
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081006152857/http://apps.sbri.org/Genome/Link/Bioinformatics_Tools_Software.aspx to http://apps.sbri.org/Genome/Link/Bioinformatics_Tools_Software.aspx/
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120402233919/http://www.jcvi.org:80/ to http://www.jcvi.org/
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070428110552/http://www.eng.ox.ac.uk:80/samp/ to http://www.eng.ox.ac.uk/samp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:46, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The title "metabolic network modeling" suggests the analysis of the network itself rather than its dynamics. This is borne out by the content, which is concerned primarily with reconstructing networks, drafting a construction, refinement of the network, and some limited content on metabolic stoichiometric analysis and then applications. The section on stoichiometric analysis was originally called metabolic network simulation, even though the bulk of that section was on the analysis of stoichiometry, with only a small section on simulation, hence the title change 
to be more accurate. The question is, where does this leave the dynamic simulation subsection? It's only a short paragraph of 11 lines. I suggest the current page focus exclusively on network analysis, that is the analysis of network structure, including their construction and not dynamics, and have a separate page reserved for dynamics. As someone pointed out 12 years ago on the talk page: "This article provides a very limited and biased view of the topic. Metabolic network modeling is a much richer topic with a vast literature." of course, they were right. If there are no objections after a month or so, I will start a new page on "Metabolic Network Dynamics" unless someone has a better idea. Rhodydog (talk) 21:41, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page might need some reoganization