Talk:Socks (cat)

message: I removed the reference to the webcomic Socks and Barney since its only 3 panels old, and not established. Seems to me like advertising more than anything.
JoDB 21:53, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Socks and Barney

message: I believe Socks may not be notable on its own. Articles about kids of Ronald Reagan and JFK were deleted as the kids died young and more importantly, as they were not notable on their own. Also, as it is a short article with less than 1000 words, I doubt if this can be considered DYK material. --Gurubrahma 05:39, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Cats always get top billing over kids! --malber 14:26, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Absolutely right. But apart from that, a glance at the list of presidential pets indicates that US presidents overwhelmingly prefer dogs. Many of the cats on the list apparently belonged to presidents' wives. Which is unsurprising - you'd sort of expect someone who spent their time rising through the ranks of the state to be more into dogs (pack animals) than cats (individualist). That makes Socks fairly unique; plus those pictures are just great :-). --Last Malthusian 12:12, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: First off, what the other's have said. Socks got plenty of media coverage while in the White House, kids who die young and DON'T have media coverage just need a stub on their parents' page(s). Also, plenty of stubs get DYK'ed. Staxringold 12:56, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability?

message: Does anyone know if Socks is a polydactyl? Those paws look big! --malber 14:23, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polydactyl 

message: I removed Category:living people, I think, its wrong. Do exist a similar category about animals? --Nolanuss 20:55, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:Living people 

message: The article says Socks WAS the cat of the Clinton family. According to his birth in 1991 he could still be alive, being 15 years old right now. Does anyone have information? --89.54.161.82 23:09, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I guess... Gridge 12:43, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I could well be wrong about the possibility of his death being reported - stereotypically the British care more about cats and dogs than most, so perhaps an American presidential cat wouldn't have the same attention. In which case we might just have to put a '?' after his birth date in maybe one or two years' time, when he'd be pretty ancient if he was alive, and leave it at that. --Sam Blanning(talk) 16:59, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a good idea. Gridge 19:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

text: There are photos of Socks taken in 2005 at Andrews Air Force Base with his new owner, and I located a website which attests that the animal was still extant as of mid-06. Fishhead64 17:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wow, yeah, a lot of cats live until their late teen's.   01:24, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still alive? 

message: So what breed is Socks? Doesn't seem to be mentioned in the article. —Lowellian (reply) 09:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Democat. --NEMT 13:26, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Breed

message: I have removed a sentence noting that popular surveys showed more Americans owned cats than dogs; it was unreferenced, and it merely added confusion to the material directly before it - if more Americans have cats, then the joke that Socks was replaced with a dog for political reasons doesn't make sense. And really, there is no reason to elaborate on the tangent of how popular cats are versus dogs, anyways. Brianyoumans 16:45, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cats vs. dogs

message: http://www.gocomics.com/doonesbury/2013/04/29
Bush's never had a first cat--that was Socks Clinton Cat!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.83.72.154 (talk) 12:53, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Doonesbury got it wrong

message: :Image:President Veroart.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 15:11, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:President Veroart.jpg

message: ...as the image of Socks at the lectern surely bespeaks all that is Cat -- this furry friend's indescribably incredible and utterly brilliant --- charisma! As a long time observer of public affairs I assure fellow Wikipedia editors that Socks is the cat of the twentieth century. Just can't wait for an Oscar-winning film treatment of Socks's bio, with some talented performer playing its lead such as Felix the Cat or The Cat and The Hat or a tremendous new talent discovered from YouTube, I'm not sure, but anyway, who cares about that, the persona of this CAT is just SO INCREDIBLE, I think about it and just get dizzy, please, somebody discover and edit in the coordinates for this miraculously gifted companion and personality's final resting place so that faithful fans such as myself can make pilgrimage and leave tokens of appreciation for this supercalfragerlousiexpialadociously whizbangboingingly wonderful feline. Once exposed to the style, grace, and felinity of this cat makes a person rethink their whole approach to life and never be able to look at anything the same way again forevermore. SOCKS THE CAT...AMAZING...TRULY THE CAT OF CATS...FOREVER!...and to sway those inexplicable few who doubt this estimation, I submit the following summation of his personality and being from one who knew Socks themself on a first-person, human-to-cat basis:"Socks, my cat, is a cat with a great imagination. He likes to watch TV. When there is a show with tweeting birds, his ears perk up. Then he crouches right in front of the TV. He acts like he wants to jump at the images he sees. When he hears cats meowing or fighting on TV, he begins to howl and acts like he wants to join the fight. This Citzen cat named Socks seems to see himself in another place. When he is staring at TV, could he be transporting himself into an imagined adventure? Who knows what is in the mind of a cat!"----FROM THE BACK COVER OF WHEN SOCKS WENT TO THE WHITE HOUSE (1994) ↜Just me, here, now … 02:57, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs to be expanded! 

message: Is there any source that says that the cat's full name was "Socks Clinton"? --Millionsandbillions (talk) 16:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: 132 for "Socks Clinton" from Google News--Caspian blue 16:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: In the intro, the article claims that Socks was a stray cat.  But then in the first part of his biography, it's stated that Socks had a sibling named Midnight and that he was apparently living with Chelsea's piano teacher.  So which was it?  If it was both, this could use some clarification.  If it wasn't both, then shouldn't one of these claims about his origin be removed?Adrigon (talk) 22:53, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps the piano teacher rescued both of them as kittens? 75.76.213.106 (talk) 07:13, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Discrepancy?

message: I am moving the following uncited material here until it can be properly supported with reliable, secondary citations, per WP:V, WP:CS, WP:IRS, WP:PSTS, WP:BLP, WP:NOR, et al. This diff shows where it was in the article. Nightscream (talk) 21:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncited material in need of citations