lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of chief ministers of Tamil Nadu

message: Dear 59.91.145.75, May I know the reason for your deletion of the section? --MS2P (talk) 04:19, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Why 'Popular Culture' section deleted?

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 17:45, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: List of chief ministers of Tamil Nadu →  – This is more than a list. There is prose as well. This section must be converted into prose to allow this. Kailash29792 (talk)  07:52, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

text: I dont see why this artical shoud be different then the rest of articals regarding CMs. for exampal, List of chief ministers of Maharashtra or List of chief ministers of West Bengal. We can change all articals regarding CMs, but it does not seem thet thet was proposed. איש עיטי (talk) 16:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose per WP:CONSISTENT, see :Category:Lists of chief ministers of Indian states. — mw (talk) (contribs) 09:34, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps the list can be bifurcated into a separate article? Kailash29792 (talk)  12:51, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no need for that; the prose at the beginning (i.e. the lead) is actually encouraged, see WP:SALLEAD. — mw (talk) (contribs) 13:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 December 2023 

message: honorable chief minister aiya avargalukum en peyar deepanagalakshmi ennaku matham 1500 rupai vanthukondu irunthathu anal indha matham inum kuda varavalilai nan oru disable person uthavi thogai varalai aiya🙏
Ranipet district walajapet. 2409:4072:685:F77:680B:F7FF:FE13:2BD2 (talk) 09:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  +919629904652
Talk:List of famous Old Etonians

message: Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion Apr 26 to May 3 2004, consensus was to redirect to Eton College.  Discussion:
This page is a stub entirely duplicating stuff on the main Eton College page and should go
BozMo
*Redirect to Eton College and maintain list there. Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 10:40, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Links to (disambiguation) pages

message: «This page is 104 kilobytes long.» That makes it harder to update manually. Shouldn't it be split? Will it cause any other problems? If to split how? Subpages by letter? Or should I forget about updating it at all? --Nabla 13:44, 2005 Jun 8 (UTC)
: I got the impression from Wikipedia:Links to (disambiguation) pages/How to update that this list was actually generated by a database query, so I didn't think people would be updating it manually at all. But yes, the list is getting so long it should be split up into subpages, the way Wikipedia:Links to disambiguation pages is. Noel (talk) 00:27, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  more than 100k long - split? 

message: If we can't come up with a good reason for this list, I'm going to nominate it for deletion. - brenneman 02:24, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To keep disambiguation pages off Special:Lonelypages, which only lists the first 1000 lonely pages. That's a good point, but I don't see any other one. --Alvestrand 06:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is that valid? The first page I looked at was already linked to. Aren't most "X (disambiguation)" pages linked to from "X"? "4th of July (disambiguation)" is linked from "Independence Day (United States)". "511 (disambiguation)" is linked from "511". What's the point in this list? Stevage 12:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  It appears to be totally senseless.  Gene Nygaard (talk) 13:41, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I had thought that the purpose of these links, when I saw them in "what links here" for a disambiguation page, was to identify diambiguation pages which had links other than from the article being disambiguated, or from talk pages.  In other words I that it was to identify disambiguation pages which probably had some links in need of being disambiguated.  That would make sense; but it is impossible to use in that manner for someone trying to do such cleanup, if this list includes even thos pages which have links only from the pages being disambiguated.  Gene Nygaard (talk) 13:44, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purpose? 

message: Not all disambiguation pages have "(disambiguation)" in the name e.g. Lincoln, C2C, etc Simply south 09:31, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and they are listed here: Wikipedia:Links to disambiguating pages. Salad Days 20:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to disambiguation pages
Talk:Cold reading (theatrical)

message: Split this page cold reading (theatrical) out of cold reading as part of disambiguation. Original authors of this page:
 (cur) (last) . . m 21:48, 17 Jan 2003 . . WojPob (linkage)
 (cur) (last) . . 21:38, 17 Jan 2003 . . Barkingdoc (theatrical term meaning to read aloud from a text which one is seeing for the first time. )
Zuytdorp Survivor 12:29, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Split
Talk:Gens de couleur

message: Not clear why there are articles on Free people of color, which is supposed to address the mixed-race class in Saint-Domingue and other islands, and this one. It appears they should be merged, since they are both dealing with the societies of French colonies. Looks like a lot of overlap and confusion among these articles: also Creoles of color. Whatever historic distinctions once existed are getting blurred in some of these attempts to be "global." Also, all these articles need to have inline citations to reliable sources. At this point, they are anecdotal.Parkwells (talk) 15:33, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Question overlap
Talk:Teaching

message: hmm.. wouldn't it be better to redirect this to education, rather than teachers?
I looked it up, expecting to find methods of teaching, etc, not to find out what a teacher is.  Maybe the teacher subject should be reworked to first describe the process, and then describe different kinds of teacher, though?
:I went ahead and changed it to redirect to Pedagogy, the science of teaching. Education was a good stab, but in my estimation it covers both sides: Teaching and Learning. There are links on Pedagogy to both Education and Teacher. Applejuicefool (talk) 14:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

message: — Assignment last updated by BlakeForrest (talk) 18:25, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Science Communication

message: — Assignment last updated by A.Nachee (talk) 06:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Information Literacy and Scholarly Discourse

message: This article is cited 0 times, all other references more than 10 times. Why is this further reading notable?
* 
Due to lack of notability propose to delete. HudecEmil (talk) 10:24, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: pinging @HiLo48 HudecEmil (talk) 10:25, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

text: will remove with edit note "this article has been cited by 0 other peer-reviewed articles, lack of notability" HudecEmil (talk) 11:17, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove reference Further reading
Talk:Critical point

message: Apologies for the edit summary for my latest edit: revert to last version before all the text was deleted (by Robbot) - I meant to say "revert to last version (by Robbot) before all the text was deleted". The user who deleted all the text is 68.227.211.200. -- pne 13:31, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lola Lynn

message: Article Lola Lynn listed on WP:VFD Apr 25 to May 3 2004, consensus was to delete.  However article had previously been redirected to Jack Chick so redirect was kept.  Discussion:
Delete. Lola Lynn seems to be mentioned only as the spouse of Jack Chick, and is already covered by that article. --Zigger 14:08, 2004 Apr 26 (UTC)
* Unless she's actually done something besides marry Jack Chick, delete. -- Cyrius|✎ 16:15, Apr 26, 2004 (UTC)
*Delete. Doesn't seem notable of her own accord. Niteowlneils 17:15, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Benita Ferrero-Waldner

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 02:56, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Is there some special reason for the name "Benita"? In 1948, I doubt it's after Benito Mussolini.
:Sorry, can't answer that question. Does "updating wiki syntax" automatically mean having to do without captions? This is the only obvious change, and it's for the worse. <KF> 20:35, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: "Benita", as a woman's name is perfectly normal in Spanish, at least (and in Italian, I imagine), as is the masculine form, "Benito". The fact that a famous dictator bore the name is just coincidence. Jonur (talk) 11:34, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Benita

message: The article says "After her previous marriage had finally been annulled Ferrero-Waldner married her husband again in church in December 2003."
Which husband would that be? Presumably Ferrero, since her surname is still Ferrero, but the wording is ambiguous, to say the least. Jonur (talk) 08:50, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Remarriage
Talk:The Fall of Gondolin

message: I couldn’t find copyright data, or licence info. This may be an oversight. Please take the time to check and provide information to demonstrate that this image is suitable for use on Wikipedia. Thank you Edaham (talk) 00:46, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's clearly a copyrighted image of a commercially sold book cover. It needed an WP:NFUR since it is non-free. -- 70.51.203.56 (talk) 14:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for adding the required data. Edaham (talk) 01:32, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main image 

message: We say that the 1917 "remains the only full account ..."; "A partial later version ... shows a great expansion". And now we have the first stand-alone version. 
Here I believe "full account" means complete in scope, altho perhaps sketchy; the only version that takes the story from beginning to end. And that is so because the "great expansion" --altho it produces a full account as I would say it-- is incomplete in scope; in particular, it stops before the end of the story.
Does the 1917 remain the only full/complete account late in 2018, after publication of the book? --P64 (talk) 03:01, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full, partial, and book-length versions 

message: There is no need for Gondolin to have a separate article. There is a lot of overlap between these two articles, and it will remove the in-universe quality to the Gondolin article if it is merged to the work of fiction it comes from.--Jack Upland (talk) 05:24, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Gondolin here 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hidden Way. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Hog Farm (talk) 02:43, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hidden Way" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Caragdûr. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 25#Caragdûr until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Hog Farm (talk) 15:18, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Caragdûr" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Caragdur. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 17#Caragdur until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Hog Farm (talk) 03:27, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Caragdur" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:John Kerry/Archive 1

message: Did Kerry live in Berlin? I have heart something like that. 82.83.0.240 00:11, 14 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know, User:82.83.0.240, but it's quite possible--his father was a diplomat and he spent at least part of his time growing up overseas... jengod 00:32, Feb 14, 2004 (UTC)
yes, as a child he did. (in then still the western part) 62.134.92.74 00:36, 14 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kerry in Berlin? 

message: * Use left:
** Evercat, Jengod, —Eloquence, Maximus Rex, Dori, Fuzheado, No Guru, JDR, Anthony DiPierro RickK
* Use right:
** ChrisDJackson
Comments:
The right one is ugly. We should use reasonable looking pics for everyone. Evercat 02:50, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The new right one is even uglier. I wouldn't wish being fotographed from a low angle on Idi Amin. jengod 03:01, Feb 16, 2004 (UTC)   
* At the very least, the first, most prominent photo should be the standard shot. You can debate the merits of the "patriotic" photo as a secondary photo, but to be consistent with G.W. Bush's portrait, we should go with the straight shot. Fuzheado
Nice tactic Chris, replace the photo just as you lose the vote. Quit it. Your behaviour is anti-social to say the least. Evercat 03:07, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Informal image vote

message: i don't have time to incorporate the info from this news item into this article. could someone please do so. Also, it would be nice maybe to have external links to the images. maybe it deserves its own article? Kingturtle 07:52, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  doctored photo
Talk:Soulfly (Soulfly album)

message: 'Thou shalt not kill' is the sixth commandment. Was Max just confused? VenomousConcept (talk) 10:58, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Commandment?
Talk:Primitive (Soulfly album)

message: lol the son of john lennon produced his  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.208.18.89 (talk) 17:31, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:3 (Soulfly album)

message: *Strong Support please see my discussion --Lox (t,c) 22:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting

message: How is this symbol possible to type on a computer?? Georgia guy 22:30, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Depends on your operating system. If it's capable of hexadecimal Unicode input, the code is 0950 (on Mac OS X for example use Hexadecimal Unicode Input as your keyboard layout and type alt-0950). Or try using the Devanagari keyboard layout -- Adam Nohejl 12:24, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symbol 
Talk:Pan Sonic

message: What's a 5K sound system? Is that a measure of the price, the power, or what? Nohat 16:13, 2004 Apr 26 (UTC)
:Wattage- power output. Fixed. Magic Window 12:59, Apr 27, 2004 (UTC)
Is there any truth to the story that in exchange for changing their name, they got time in Panasonic's labs, which was used to record "A"?
The "10 hours in a garage" trivia is somewhat inaccurate: it wasn't late 80's but 1991, and it wasn't Pan sonic but ultra 3, in which Ilpo was a member. A group called sin Ø was an "extension" of ultra 3 with Mika joining (1993). Later Ilpo and Mika started making music together as Panasonic. Kasimir K 16:50, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I just moved this article from Pan sonic to Pan Sonic per a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves.  There was already a non-trivial edit history at Pan Sonic, where there had been some content that was merged into the article at Pan sonic.  Thus, instead of just moving the page, I swapped the two histories, so the contribution history of the article formerly at Pan Sonic can now be found in the history at the Pan sonic redirect. -GTBacchus(talk) 20:44, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: Mentioning Reat without specifically crediting it as a Mika Vainio solo project is extremely misleading, especially since the article has absolutely no mention of any of Mika Vainio or Ilpo Väisänen‘s non-Pan Sonic work.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.236.160.123 (talk) 05:02, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reat
Talk:1808 United States presidential election

message: On the map listing the electoral votes for Maryland, the marker indicating 2 for Pinckney is half obscured by the marker indicating Madison's 9. Wikidude10000 (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the map - tiny problem 

message: I find it quite bizarre that Wikipedia has actually claimed popular vote figures in presidential elections from before 1824, likely fudged from another website. I have deleted dubious popular vote references from the 1820 and 1816 elections. A request for comment would be very helpful. Classicalfan626 (talk) 23:35, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable popular vote figures from before 1824 are not available
Talk:Will to power (disambiguation)

message: Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion Apr 26 to May 3 2004, consensus was to keep and list on cleanup.  Discussion:
As of this moment, it seems to be a series of quotes or extracts from various works. If it is work in progress, we need to give the author some time, if it is meant to be an article, it may be unsalvageable. 
PaulinSaudi 12:40, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD

message: Ok, I did some of the Cleanup, per the CU page, and I think the top part of the article is fair now.  It could be better, and there are lots of Nietzscheans who could expand and contextualize.  I've read the book, and a fair amount of other Nietzsche, but I'm no fan, so I wasn't interested in doing much more.  That said, this article sat on Cleanup for 2 months, and it seems like no one was inspired to alter it much.  
My question is this:  Nietzsche's sister is long dead, and his works are very Public Domain.  However, Walter Kauffman is not public domain, that I'm aware of.  These huge sections all credit (thankfully) the translator, but do we have any proof that we have permission?  Is it public domain and I'm just wrong to assume otherwise because it's 20th century?  I see that people thought that this was probably fair use, but I'm not sure, and people thought that the copyright expired.  Can't any German speakers do a private translation of the texts and avoid the whole problem?  (I say this because there are plenty of translations that keep their copyrights current.)
Since the article is about to roll off Cleanup, I was on the verge of blanking all those quotes, but I don't want to do that if there is permission or the translation is public. Geogre 20:11, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio?
Talk:Will the Shill

message: Article Will the Shill listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion Apr 26 to May 3 2004, consensus was to keep.  Discussion:
Page is devoted to publicizing an insulting epithet, applying it to right-wing columist George Will, and Will McDonough, a sportswriter with whom I am unfamiliar.  Smerdis of Tlön 16:19, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)

message: Comments on this page following from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation#Will the Shill:
Certainly as things stand it cannot be sustained as a disambiguation article. After consideration, I have redirected to shill. A quick Google suggests more than one source referring to George Will as "Will the Shill", but unless and until the article contains this information citing a reliable source that meets the standards for biographies of living persons, disambiguation pages should not be associating this term with this person. I do not feel qualified to determine if such content is appropriate, let alone write such a section myself.  --MegaSloth (talk) 15:59, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Thanks, MegaSloth. momoricks 22:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: This page (Will the Shill) as a disambiguation page
Talk:Mister Peepers

message: Why does Mr. Peepers redirect to Krusty the Klown? Mr. Peepers was a 50's sitcom and as far as I know has nothing to do with the Simpsons character. MK 03:57, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Though I created the redirect, I have no idea why... Martin
As of February 2010, this article now refers to someone's cat, rather than the 1950s television sitcom starring Wally Cox. Can this be fixed, please? If someone is interested in this particular cat, wonderful. But the TV show needs a page as well.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.143.202.206 (talk) 02:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Krusty?

message: Why does the title for this entry abbreviate "Mister"? I've been watching the kinescopes of the series, and in the titles it's "Mister Peepers" not "Mr. Peepers". Can we change this to being spelled out? Signinstranger 17:34, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title Wrong?

message: It was played by a recorder (block flute) consort, perhaps a quartet. Was a quite-likable composition, not technically difficult. Nikevich 05:02, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theme music of the show
Talk:Embassy World Snooker Championship

message: it is written:
 Stephen Hendry is the youngest ever World Champion, winning in 1990 at the age of 21.
But aint Ronnie O'Sullivan the youngest ever???????
:Our RO'S page reckons he was 26 when he won in 2001. But also reckons he was the youngest ever. Looks like that page is wrong? Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 16:59, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, Hendry was a much younger world champion, I'll correct the RO'S page. At least this proves people are reading what I wrote :) --Auximines 07:34, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)

text: I think that's a good idea. Obviously we should mention the important role that Embassy's sponsorship in changing the game (i.e. starting the modern era) but that should be in the context of the entire history of the Championships. Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 07:57, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Walter McCrone

message: Why are not the results of the carbon 14 tests within this article? If I remember correctly the shroud was dated at around 1400.Kazuba (talk) 18:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Those results should be covered in the Shroud of Turin article -- they were there when I was editing that article, although there were efforts to downplay the carbon-14 dating or to give undue weight to the critics of the procedure.  In the McCrone article, though, I don't think they need to be included.  I'm not aware that McCrone had any involvement with that aspect of the Shroud testing. JamesMLane t c 19:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Shroud and Carbon 14

message: This Talk page has a template saying "Walter McCrone has been listed as a level-5 vital article in People, Social scientists. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as Start-Class."
Why is that? Was he social scientist too? --Hob Gadling (talk) 15:47, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it to "chemists". Also remove "s&a" from a template that didn't like it. --Hob Gadling (talk) 06:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social scientist?