Talk:Riparian Plaza

message: I've made a significant rewrite of the article - the original was rather chaotic, and seemed somewhat less than neutral, with a number of emotive adjectives used. Nick Moss 23:06, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: With that great photo added, the other two were no longer necessary and were making the article too long, so I deleted the links.Iorek85 23:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: I can't find a reference for the number of elevators for the infobox. If you know the number, please add it, or if you have a source, let us know. - Shiftchange (talk) 06:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not saying we can use this as a source, as I'm constantly removing skyscrapercity forum links from references on articles, but this post appears to say it has 8 elevators in total. That doesn't seem like many to me, seeing as most skyscrapers of this height have at least 15-20, that I know of anyway. --timsdad  (talk) 07:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have the building plans for Riparian PLaza. It has thirteen lifts in total. They comprise 6x Low rise lifts, 4x High Rise Lifts and 2x Residential lifts. These are all 23 passange cars. There is also 1x Goods lift rated at 2,500kg. There are also 2x carpark lifts however these would not normally be included in the count as they are outside of the core. MyFavco (talk) 03:12, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of elevators 

message: Timsdad has edited this page so that the Developer is incorrectly listed as Grocon. I have reverted this edit. This simple and obvious fact can be verified with the smallest amount of Research. -MyFavco (talk) 02:54, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Was that comment even worth starting a discussion about? It's clearly not disputed, I mistakenly reverted more of your edit than I meant to, and for that I am sorry. --timsdad  (talk) 06:53, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, I aplogise for the tone of my comment above, it was little harsh. However, at the time I was rather perplexed that my correction of such an obvious error was reverted so quickly. I can see now how it happened. It is good to see that we have since built upon each others comments to jointly further improve other related pages.MyFavco (talk) 11:55, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed Facts 

message: In keeping with the articles for 
Central Park (skyscraper), (perth), 120 Collins Street, (melb), 101 Collins Street, (melb), Bourke Place, (melb) --- communications spires are now included in height of Australian buildings.
(official riparian website also quotes 250m)
communications masts now count as spires if they double as an integral part of the buildings design.
If this is so for buildings like central park perth, and bourke place, it is certainly the central design point for riparian.
http://www.riparianplaza.com.au/Core/Content/AConceptualFirst/Content1254.aspx  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saruman-the-white (talk • contribs) 08:17, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mast is now counted in height 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Riparian Plaza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080720064741/http://www.brookfieldmultiplex.com/construction/projects/property-details/561/Riparian-Plaza to http://www.brookfieldmultiplex.com/construction/projects/property-details/561/Riparian-Plaza
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050104072208/http://propertyweb.com.au/press/pr0278.html to http://propertyweb.com.au/press/pr0278.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090211155113/http://www.infolink.com.au/n/Major-Brisbane-development-project-designed-by-Harry-Seidler-n752592 to http://www.infolink.com.au/n/Major-Brisbane-development-project-designed-by-Harry-Seidler-n752592
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081121132640/http://www.seidler.net.au/projects/032.html to http://www.seidler.net.au/projects/032.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:48, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified