Talk:Cultural movement

message: * See also periodization.
* Consider moving or copying the style lists into respective genres, once the genre pages exist.
* Article's generalizations seem to be compatible with high school world history texts.
* Renaissance shouldn't be called the "golden age of theater and architecture".  
* It is "tricky" to pick date ranges for the various "renaissances" in different areas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BryceHarrington (talk • contribs) 20:01, 18 August 2001 (UTC)
replies: text: Incidentalism Commensing 1995 and ongoing Idiosyntactix incident. Zen-like theorectical and practical applications of the unpreconceived. Incidentalism holds all art as both original and derivative. Artifact (or commodity) is the result of artistic practice. Art objects may be owned; however, all intellectual property is fraud.
So, you're saying that "Incidentalism" is a major cultural movement, comparable with the others listed here, rather than a small group of web pranksters?  Please justify this with evidence from independent sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.253.39.225 (talk) 20:05, 20 December 2002 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I can't find any evidence that Neen is indeed a de-facto art movement.  It appears to be a small group of artists who are willing to put their names behind the idea of one man -- Miltos Manetas.  Judging by the amount of web content refering to Neen, since it's inception in 2000 the movement has not make a wide impact.  Claims that this is the first time a movement have addressed the computer medium are exegerated (IMO).  The concept is now well-covered by the Neen page (I re-wrote it recently).  I suggest either removing Neen from this page entirely or, if there are objections to that, converting it to a one line link. --Oliver Crow 20:09, 15 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal: remove Neen 

message: Does anyone think it is a good idea to add commercial links on this site? i don`t like it, because mostly everything is shaped by 
culture so what link is right?
New concept: create a Self-declared art movement page. --Oliver Crow 20:32, 15 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links !!!! 

message: This should be merged with Social movement, I think. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 18:41, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: After half a year to think on this :p I'd rather move this article to cultural change. Comments?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 04:05, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cultural movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070630191903/http://www.worldhistory-poster.com/en/about/listed-terms to http://www.worldhistory-poster.com/en/about/listed-terms
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:52, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified