Talk:Henipavirus

message: * consider using in-text references
* consider using less jargon and technical terms!
--Steven Fruitsmaak 19:13, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  suggestion 

message: After review, I've determined this to be a good article, meeting the qualifications. I appreciate the diagrams and maps, though a map for the Hendra virus outbreaks, in the same style as the Nipah outbreaks, would be a nice touch.
For future improvement, I'd recommend focusing on expanded explanations of technical terms and jargon, limiting their use where possible.
Keep up the good work, and don't hesitate to message me if you want more clarification on my reasons for promotion. Phidauex 18:52, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This is a [[WP:GA|Good Article]]

message: Under 'July 2008', there is mention to 'the death of one, veterinary surgeon Dr. Ben Cuneen'; this same person is listed as a fatality under '2008 August'. This layout incorrectly implies that these were two separate fatalities.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.2.249.118 (talk) 08:24, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading description under 'Outbreaks' 

message: Nii, Nipah!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.211.102.213 (talk) 01:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mii 

message: This does not follow WP:LEAD --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:20, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead 

message: this has to be one of the hugest coincedenses ever.
1. Nipah
2. Strange outbreak
3. Rural village
If this doesn't scream Higurashi, I don't know what does  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.91.122.179 (talk) 16:33, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honestly though 

message: This tag has been added in order to alert those with some time and knowledge to update the article after the first case of a dog catching the virus has been reported. Source and basic description has already been added in the section, 'Outbreaks' but this is inconsistent throughout the rest of the article. YuMaNuMa (talk) 06:47, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: teapot is working hard on this article YuMaNuMa, it isn't appropriate to tag it as "outdated" when the new event was reported today.  I will put on a proper tag in a moment.  Montanabw(talk) 15:16, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This is why I added a specific reason to why I tagged it with outdated, it was the most appropriate way of notifying the main contributors to this article and I get that teapot is working hard on this article, in no way is tagging the the article outdated intended to attack or critise the main contributors to this article.. YuMaNuMa (talk) 02:11, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

text: The intro itself may eventually benefit from a rewrite to not reference any particular current outbreak other than, perhaps, a temporary ref to a specific current crisis.  I suspect it was the stuff on Bangladesh from a couple years back in the intro that triggered the original tag.  But that's a style issue mostly.  I figure you or someone will eventually do that bit of cleanup. Montanabw(talk) 18:48, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

text: I will keep what you said in mind. Thanks for the advice ! YuMaNuMa (talk) 05:39, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag: Outdated (July 2011)  

message: Anyone clever want to tease out the implications of Cedar? My capacity is undeveloped in this regard and the only good thing about this is that I am aware of my significant limitations. Im a teapot (talk) 13:15, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cedar virus 

message: I believe there is not much value in separating the NSW  and Queensland maps; If anything, it makes the actual area of concern less easy to visualise...
--MarmotteiNoZ 01:54, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed merging both Australian maps into one 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Henipavirus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061210071513/http://www.icddrb.org:80/pub/publication.jsp?classificationID=56 to http://www.icddrb.org/pub/publication.jsp?classificationID=56&pubID=6590
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:21, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Henipavirus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090203073526/http://www.icddrb.org:80/pub/publication.jsp?pubID=9038&classificationID=0&typeClassificationID=0 to http://www.icddrb.org/pub/publication.jsp?pubID=9038&classificationID=0&typeClassificationID=0
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090203073526/http://www.icddrb.org:80/pub/publication.jsp?pubID=9038&classificationID=0&typeClassificationID=0 to http://www.icddrb.org/pub/publication.jsp?pubID=9038&classificationID=0&typeClassificationID=0
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110928124410/http://www.icddrb.org/what-we-do/publications/cat_view/52-publications/10042-icddrb-periodicals/10048-health-and-science-bulletin-bangla-and-english/10102-vol-8-no-2-english-2010 to http://www.icddrb.org/what-we-do/publications/cat_view/52-publications/10042-icddrb-periodicals/10048-health-and-science-bulletin-bangla-and-english/10102-vol-8-no-2-english-2010
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Henipavirus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090222233532/http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org:80/cgi/content/full/2009/218/1? to http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2009/218/1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Henipavirus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060418000448/http://dobbs.com.my/ to http://dobbs.com.my/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110823060432/http://www.dpi.qld.gov.au/4790_2900.htm to http://www.dpi.qld.gov.au/4790_2900.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120519061152/http://www.csiro.au/Outcomes/Food-and-Agriculture/Fighting-Nipah-virus.aspx to http://www.csiro.au/Outcomes/Food-and-Agriculture/Fighting-Nipah-virus.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150801131243/http://henipavirus.net/ to http://www.henipavirus.net/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2009/218/1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:59, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: A split has been proposed to Henipavirus Hendra virus, Nipah virus, Cedar virus by . 
* Agree. Each virus is independently notable and article is getting quite long. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:22, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested split 

message: Don't disagree with the split, the page was getting unwieldy, but the article should still briefly summarise the subarticles. Also the lead is currently inadequate with more weight on three novel viruses (which are these, exactly?) than Hendra and Nipah. And what does "category C (USDA-HHS overlap) select agents" mean? Is it important enough for the lead? I'm happy to hack this around but I'm no expert in these viruses and someone else might do a better job.
Also I found another henipavirus article at Madagascar henipavirus, which isn't recognised as a species (yet), but (if it is notable enough for a separate article) should be at least mentioned here. Espresso Addict (talk) 01:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Split article

message: I see "Heandra" reference. I think that should be Hendra, after the suburb of Brisbane, Australia,  where the virus was first identified. 89.99.169.44 (talk) 12:16, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please check and correct 

message: — Assignment last updated by Princessslayerr (talk) 16:38, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Virology 2022