lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bertoleoni family

message: the following was moved here from the article. I believe it is completely "in topic", but I do hope someone can translate it --Gianfranco
Die Tempelritter in Wien (Austria) kennen die verborgene Geschichte Tavolaras in Zusammenhang mit der Flucht Maria Magdalenas nach Marsaille.
Wir wünschen ein Zusammentreffen mit dem  heutigen König von Tavolara S.E. Bertoleoni und könnten im September anreisen.
Bitte um Benachrichtigung an unsere e-mail Anschrift:  hofburg@krone.at
Unsere HP:
www.templer.eu.cx
Es wird uns eine Ehre sein Ihre Nachricht zu erhalten.
DerGM  Carl M. Winter zu Laach
Babel Fish translates it thus :
The temple knights in Vienna (Austria) know [the] hidden history [of] Tavolaras in connection with the escape [of] Maria Magdalenas after Marsaille. We wish a meeting with the today's king of Tavolara HIS EXCELLENCY Bertoleoni and could in September journeys. Ask for notification to our email address: hofburg@krone.at our HP: http://www.templer.eu.cx it will be us an honour your message to receive. The GM Carl M. Winter to Laach. 
--Auric 18:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to Meissner's chapter on Tavolara, the newspaper reports about Paolo I creating a republic after his death were erroneous. Goustien (talk) 06:27, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Republican period

message: Meissner also reports a King Giuseppe II (d. 1941), son and successor of Carlo I and father of Paolo II.  He says Giuseppe II was forced by economic difficulties to sell most of his land to an Italian named Tapponi. Goustien (talk) 06:27, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Giuseppe II?

message: Please see :commons:File talk:Bertoleoni photo.jpg. --Elitre (talk) 19:55, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice

message: Is Maria "Pompea" Romano (1932–2010), Tonino's late wife, any relation to Bonaparte's mother, Letitzia Romano?2600:8804:1E80:6320:B13E:B77:CF9:707E (talk) 18:10, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family Connections
Talk:Euro coins

message: I was very surprised to see (under Circulation/Statistics) that more coins of the 1c denomination are in circulation than of any other denomination.
I live in the Eurozone and don't see many 1c coins. When I get one or two in change, I try to get rid of them as quickly as possible because they're a nuisance, but I don't think I've ever had more than 2 at any one time. I see far more 5c and 10c coins.
Similarly, the article says that the USA has minted 300 billion $0.01 coins since 1983. That's nearly 1,000 coins per inhabitant of the USA! What has happened to all these coins? Surely almost nobody has got 1,000 $0.01 coins?
Maybe somebody somewhere is melting them down for scrap, because the copper they contain is worth more than the face value of the coins? Sayitclearly (talk) 09:04, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbers in circulation 
Talk:Asterism

message: The Big Dipper is also part of an existing constellation, Ursa Major. Why can't Orion's Belt be considered a separate asterism? Bryan Derksen
*The Orion's belt is just part of Orion -he has a belt, a sword, a bow, couple of arms. The Big Dipper is a reinterpretation of the star pattern in Ursa Major - a dipper is not part of a bear.   --rmhermen 
*In the constellations, Orion is pictured has having a belt around his waist, but the Bear is not pictured as having a dipper in its rump. Similarly, Aquarius does have an urn, but Sagittarius doesn't have a teapot.
B00P 05:58, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Solanales

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.britannica.com/plant/Solanales#ref595958. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Peter coxhead (talk) 14:03, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: it seems confusing with out a answer. Rguyr (talk) 02:50, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article doesn't  explain how this order is part of 5 clades
Wikipedia talk:Contents/List of reference tables

message: Because the list of reference tables is for the most part comprised of links to lists (and hardly any tables at all), it was decided at Wikipedia talk:Contents to dismantle the page, by merging it into Lists of topics, and copying links to other lists if appropriate - see the box to the right.
Lists of topics has a different format, so if you help move the links over, please be careful to format them correctly to match the formatting at the destination.
What the above means in common English is cutting and pasting the links to Lists of topics, and arranging and editing them so that they match the way the rest of that page is presented.
Don't worry about merging the whole page all at once.  It's a big chore, so if you can help out by moving just a few links, that's fine too.  Every little bit helps.
Thank you.
The Transhumanist   06:08, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dismantling the Lists of reference tables
Talk:List of terrorist incidents

message: I recently tried to revert the change from the perpetrators of the assassinations being Bosnian Serbs into the Black Hand.
While the Black Hand was greatly involved in the assassination and assisted the assassins, the acts itself were carried out by Bosnian Serbs, who were not officially members of the Black Hand, as they were not Serbian Nationalists but Bosnian-Serb Separatists. It would be more accurate to list the perpetrators as either Bosnian Serbs or Young Bosnia. 94.197.140.177 (talk) 13:08, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @94.197.140.177, Young Bosnia could be used but you need to add a inline citation to the entry. I was half considering removing it completely. Each entry in this list needs to be referenced with an inline citation and wikilinks don't cut it because WP:WINARS. Bosnian Serbs was not acceptable. TarnishedPathtalk 02:13, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perpetrator of the Assassination of Franz Ferdinand
Talk:French euro coins

message: * = No coins were minted that year for that denomination
That's wrong. Coins were minted, but only in small quantities only avilable in sets. I've already seen a french 1 Euro coin from 2005, etc. on fairs (means: they exist!). It should be marked with *** not with *. Take a look at ebay, you'll find many of there *-marked coins there. Someone really should correct it. Otherwise I'll replace the * with ** (no data avilable.) Better no data than wrong data..
Btw.. the reference (not even the official national bank page..) say for example: 
 France 2005, 50 Cent "---".
Which means:
 --- : The coin has only been minted for collector folders and does not exist in circulation.
Would be quite cool, if someone could add the data given in the reverence ;) Or perhaps try to find a reference at the french national bank page.
Bah, hate trolls adding wrong information to wikipedia.. so annoying.... --91.61.65.192 (talk) 07:54, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  WRONG!! everything is wrong T_T 

message: There reads: a new design on the French euro coins is expected in the near future
It's been over six years from that recommendation, so is that only a theoretical expectation? They aren't the only one; Austria, Germany and Italy are also yet to update their coins... 82.141.95.20 (talk) 10:22, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  new design?
Talk:Wage slavery

message: The contributor must have traveled to the future and forgotten that in the 21st century we don't use male pronouns anymore. 
'Defenses of wage labor and chattel slavery in the literature have linked the subjection of man to man with the subjection of man to nature'
Hopefully it was changed; unless quoting someone, it's best to use gender- and sex-neutral pronouns.
Joking/trolling?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.139.85.146 (talk) 12:23, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  gender neutral pronoun change 

message: The current cover-photo when sharing this article is the McDonalds protest, which is just so wrong given the historical subject of this. McDonalds workers might not be paid well but they are not a good example of the meat of this topic. Is it possible to change it to a better one? Lawrie (talk) 02:03, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover photo for this article when linking
Talk:Federal Bureau of Investigation

message: There have been several subunits added over the years (the org chart is from 2014 and out of date), I've added a few units that are described in press releases, but the organization of who they are under isn't clear.  I added them in where I think they go, but some work needs to be done to update the page. eximo (talk) 21:14, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  CEOS, VCS and other units 

message: When President John F. Kennedy was shot and killed, the jurisdiction fell to the local police departments until President Lyndon B. Johnson directed the FBI to take over the investigation. To ensure clarity about the responsibility for investigation of homicides of federal officials, the Congress passed a law that included investigations of such deaths of federal officials, especially by homicide, within FBI jurisdiction. This new law was passed in 1965. 
Requesting you change what's written I above to what I have written down below. It fixes some spelling errors
When President John F. Kennedy was shot and killed, the jurisdiction  fell to the local police departments until President Lyndon B. Johnson directed the FBI to take over the investigation. To ensure clarity about the responsibility for investigation of homicides of federal officials, Congress passed a law in 1965 that included investigations of such deaths of federal officials, especially by homicide, within FBI jurisdiction. 108.53.130.81 (talk) 01:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Tollens (talk) 10:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 April 2024 

message: Criminal Justice Information Services Division hyperlink needs adjusted   
Change: CJIA to CJIS ChrisKirk (talk) 16:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Diff Happy Editing--IAmChaos 18:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 May 2024
Talk:Rhode Island

message: So I discovered that the page preview of this article was shown 41.7°N 71.5°W instead of its casual preview. I don't know how to fix this, so i'm letting y'all know about this issue. Spookycheems (talk) 03:46, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not exactly sure where you are looking, but I did look through the Wikidata page and saw different lat/lon pairs. One was for the geographic center (where the population exactly balances) of the state, another was a little further north (and the one you illustrated which probably allows for the best sizing of the state through various zoom levels), and the last was the most northern point (although that one looked like it was in Massachusetts and not Rhode Island). Not sure if this is an issue or not considering the geographic centers don't necessarily make the best mapping points. Inomyabcs (talk) 18:13, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed by WallAdhesion. Thanks for reporting. Inomyabcs (talk) 03:07, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Preview Not Right 

message: I don't found any areas in this article. 2001:448A:11A3:1039:FDF7:E9C:8899:6659 (talk) 06:05, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There is contradictory information in various sources. See #Clear the area above. DMacks (talk) 06:23, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I know that's it. I know that it has already mentioned above. 2001:448A:11A3:1039:FDF7:E9C:8899:6659 (talk) 07:59, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Land area 

message: The map in the infobox "zooms" in on the state, but details remain pitifully small. Scrolling down, there really isn't any useful map giving overview of the state. 
Compare the map in the Aquidneck Island article. Immediately much more useful scale, though perhaps lacking even the bare amount of details (since its only purpose is to compare the island to the state).
CapnZapp (talk) 17:23, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: There are multiple maps of the state in the geography section, including a map showing highways and cities, and a topo map. Perhaps a newer instance of the political map would be useful. The infobox map is the same type used for every single U.S. state. Rhode Island is the smallest state, of course it will not show up large on that map. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 19:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  actually useful map of the state? 

message: I found this in the population growth chart:
1970	946,725		10.1%
1980	947,154		0.0%
This can't be right. There is a definite population growth of about 400 in the 10-year difference. It's a very small change in this context, but can't be 0.0% is impossible. I'm pretty new to Wikipedia, so I don't know how to edit tables. Can somebody fix this? Thanks. TheFluffyProto (talk) 23:02, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I did the math and that is a 0.045% change in population. That rounds to 0.0% with the number of significant figures used in the table. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:15, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  0.0% population growth from 1970 to 1980 can't be true
Talk:Word game

message: I'm trying to organise this page and letter games. I see a big difference between the following, but I'm not sure how to classify it. Suggestions / work in progress below. -- user:Tarquin
==== charades etc ====
games like Scrabble but traditional rather than commercial -- focus on the meaning of words
==== board games ====
letter games like Scrabble, a board game
==== pangrams & lipograms etc ====
literary / linguistic diversion, which in their style are related to Mathematical games. The focus is on the letters & the structure of words
----
Explanation of recent edit: I think the external links at the bottom (two booksellers and a few internet word game sites) made the page too commercial. Wikipedia is not a place to list editors' favorite websites. The Google Web Directory link gives a less biased portal to lots of online word game sites, and has related links to sociology, word play, etc...
----
Is this the page to list Dingbats on? If so, where should it go? Angela 01:36, Oct 11, 2003 (UTC)
----
How can you have a list of word games without balderdash? I would add it myself but I'm not sure what section it goes under  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.241.113.173 (talk) 19:13, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: literary / linguistic diversion, which in their style are related to Mathematical games. The focus is on the letters & the structure of words
----
Explanation of recent edit: I think the external links at the bottom (two booksellers and a few internet word game sites) made the page too commercial. Wikipedia is not a place to list editors' favorite websites. The Google Web Directory link gives a less biased portal to lots of online word game sites, and has related links to sociology, word play, etc...
----
Is this the page to list Dingbats on? If so, where should it go? Angela 01:36, Oct 11, 2003 (UTC)
----
How can you have a list of word games without balderdash? I would add it myself but I'm not sure what section it goes under  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.241.113.173 (talk) 19:13, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  pangrams & lipograms etc 

message: I would like to see a better distinction between general types of games such solving anagrams, versus a specific implementation of a game, such as AnagramsTM. Right now we have them jumbled together. Any way we can get them unscrambled? Zyxwv99 (talk) 13:59, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further sorting of games into categories 

message: How do you earn points how do you on your iPad when you're playing the app word chain 99.135.128.191 (talk) 00:30, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  PointsPoints
Talk:Accidental (music)

message: The claim that double accidentals arose in 1615 is dubious.  The cited source is clearly a circular reference, added after the claim in this article had had a "citation needed" tag for ten years.  Over 100 years later, musicians were still using additive single accidentals where modern practice would call for double accidentals; see Bach's WTC.  (Some manuscripts use the newly invented x-shaped double sharp sign, but others use single sharp accidentals that add to the sharp in the key signature, and all use the second approach for flats.)  Keys in which double accidentals might reasonably appear were not yet in use in 1615.  I have accordingly removed the claim from the article. Phoogenb (talk) 08:29, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double accidentals in 1615
Talk:Quantum Leap

message: See also: Talk:Quantum leap (disambiguation)#Redirect, Quantum leap (disambiguation) (which you're invalidating with this undiscussed change), Talk:Quantum Leap#Page move, and the above RfC. Please open a new RfC if you think all of that has changed. -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:35, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Why don't you count again. The existing consensus is and has always been to redirect to the TV show. The new editors whom you are edit warring against only confirm this as well.--JOJ Hutton 13:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  No new discussion for changing the existing consensus 
Talk:K9

message: K-9 → K9 – on the model of most other letter-number combination dis-ambiguation pages. Georgia guy 15:45, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation and sign your vote with ~~~~    
*Support Gdr 09:40, 2005 Apr 18 (UTC)
This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. violet/riga (t) 17:19, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: I've deleted "The term originated in the military, where designations such as G2 are common." I think this is incorrect, and it's uncited
To the contrary, see, for example 
*Punch, Volumes 46-47, Various authors, 1864 ("THE RIGHT CONSTABLE IN THE RIGHT PLACE. -- Policeman K 9 (Canine) at the Islington Dog Show."), and 
*Hallberger's illustrated magazine, Volume 1, E. Halliberger, 1876 ("Spelling Bees would be amused at the various ways of rendering 'Canine Castle,' such as 'K-nine Castle,' and, better still, 'K. 9. Castle'"), 
*Mr. Fox's Pinch for Pride, Frances Clark, 1887 ("This blunt and honest creature's name was 'Bob;' on his collar was K. 9.") travisl (talk) 18:27, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Term origination
Talk:Apple Inc.

message: Please could somebody add :Category:Companies in the Dow Jones Global Titans 50 ? 78.148.152.27 (talk) 22:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Saucysalsa30 (talk) 21:09, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New cat 

message: Here is the apple logo:  2601:C2:1500:A90:C568:1DD:64F:7F80 (talk) 13:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apple logo should be on Wikipedia  

message: Is there an equivalent criticism article for Apple, similar to Criticism of Microsoft, Criticism of Netflix, Criticism of Amazon, etc.? The existing Criticism of Apple is simply a redirect to Apple Inc.? GobsPint (talk) 19:02, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Through a series of page moves, the criticism section ended up at Apple supply chain. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I’ve retargeted the various criticism redirects back there. It seems one person changed all of them. The criticism page was moved to “Practices of Apple Inc.” then to “Apple supply chain”. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Criticism of Apple]] missing/lacking? 

message: 2600:8804:A80:60C0:C5AF:71FB:99CC:24CC (talk) 22:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You have not specified what to be changed. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 23:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 April 2024 

message: The redirect Criticism of Apple Inc. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Criticism of Apple Inc.]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Civilization

message: A recent  by  removed some context about Samuel P. Huntington. This is in , but it's describing speculation from the 1990s about the 21st century, which we're already almost a quarter of the way through. The justification is that this is , but I think that if this is the case then we should prefer recent sources, especially when we're talking about the 21st century.      — Freoh 02:02, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Its one of the main if not the main concept about civilizations future and yes almost just a quarter of the way through so it stays a little more than 75 years and we will see.109.93.182.214 (talk) 03:25, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems like predictions about the future is one of the cases where age matters the most, especially when the "future" predicted by old sources overlaps with the present discussed by current sources. Why do you oppose clarifying when Huntington made his predictions?      — Freoh 12:59, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

text: If you're not going to explain your edit, then I'm going to revert it.      — Freoh 18:23, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I registered, so all what I said stays, and other persons opinions in that section argues so its totally ok. Karlik1234 (talk) 17:12, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, why do you oppose clarifying  Huntington made his predictions?      — Freoh 13:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huntington's "future"