lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Felipe Rose

message: * Add references
* Break apart into sections for readability
* More on his role in the Village People
* More on his other professional works
* More on his public service efforts
CJLippert 04:59, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do to improve 

message: I am moving the following uncited material here until it can be properly supported with inline citations of reliable, secondary sources, per WP:V, WP:CS, WP:IRS, WP:PSTS, WP:BLP, WP:NOR, et al. This diff shows where it was in the article. Nightscream (talk) 16:08, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncited material in need of citations

message: ... for Native identity. No one has ever claimed this guy. If you like his music/performance art... fine. Doesn't make him Native. If you would have told us when this guy was performing his offensive stereotypes in that ridiculous costume that people would be trying to edit his article to say that was "his father's tribal regalia" and that he was Apache, er, no, Lakota, er, no, Taino, er no.... you would have gotten spit-takes. Not Native. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 22:53, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-claims are not sufficient...
Talk:Moses Brings Plenty

message: I furnished secondary sources to demonstrate Brings Plenty's notability as an actor, dancer, and musician. If need be, I can dig up more. -Uyvsdi (talk) 18:50, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: If Moses was 27 when he died, I think his year of birth was 1996. De Jaren (talk) 06:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: There is Wikipedia confusion between Cole Brings Plenty and Moses Brings Plenty 86.183.143.194 (talk) 07:57, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The section about Moses's nephew Cole needs to be split off as its own article, but no one seems willing to write it at the moment.  96.69.249.93 (talk) 13:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless more information comes out, there isn not enough information on Cole for a separate article. Keep the few sentences in this article for now. Yeoutie (talk) 16:50, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth 

message: I removed irrelevant content about his nephew Cole Brings Plenty, it has been replaced, I can see no reason for including it. Wikipedia is not a family history project. Theroadislong (talk) 13:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cole Brings Plenty
Talk:Hương Sơn district

message: Article needs literal meaning of province name, and Han Tu. Badagnani 07:29, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Literal meaning

message: This article shouldn't use . If an infobox is really necessary, we should make a similar . – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 23:07, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: The lead should give the province in which this district is. Badagnani (talk) 00:47, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead missing province name
Talk:Fifth World (mythology)

message: I have added links to this page in Mesoamerican Long Count calendar, Mayan religion, Hopi mythology#Pahana, Quetzalcoatl and End Time#Hopi. Darkfrog24 (talk) 23:59, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for deorphaning... I had no idea this article existed until you updated Hopi mythology. Yworo (talk) 01:37, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I had no idea this concept existed until I checked out WP: Orphan. Darkfrog24 (talk) 03:19, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Orphaned status

message: If I'm not mistaken, the 2012 thing is nonsense.--90.179.235.249 (talk) 01:59, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2012 

message: The article states: "The Maya calendar charts out this progression through astrology, concluding that the current, fourth world will end sometime near the December solstice in 2012 (dates vary based on interpretation)." This is nonsense. Apparently the author didn't actually read the article to which he linked. If you read the Maya calendar and the Mesoamerican Long Count calendar articles you will see that there is no Mayan doomsday prediction. There is no Aztec doomsday prediction either. The debate about which correlation to use was largely settled in about 1950 so the "(dates vary based on interpretation)" part is wrong. This is described at length in the section about correlations between the Long Count and western calendars section in the Mesoamerican Long Count calendar article. Senor Cuete (talk) 14:47, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mis-information about the Maya Calendar 

message: Has it ever been suggested that the Europeans arriving with drastic consequence is the 'sixth world' to these beliefs?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kapler42 (talk • contribs) 18:04, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  mythology of number 

message: See ,  and  for starters. Removed Hancock as a reference. Dougweller (talk) 20:58, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some academic sources 

message: Please also note the sources linked above. Some nice material in the new edits but a couple of dodgy references. The "Enlil Institute" is really one person self-publishing on lulu.com. His Amazon page says " He attended the University of Nigeria, and graduated from the State University of New York with a Bachelors degree in Political Science. He also earned a Juris Doctorate from New York University School of Law. Author J. Paul Olweny was born in Kampala, Uganda. He attended school in Australia and Canada before graduating with a degree in Political Science." So clearly fails our criteria at WP:RS. Diana Doyle is a school teacher and her website also fails our criteria - not reliably published and she isn't a recognised expert. Waters is just New Age, doesn't belong here. Locke doesn't seem to be a specialist or reliably published. Doug Weller (talk) 15:10, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  New edits
Talk:Sherm Cohen

message: I rearranged some wording and changed some likes around so that the page flows more smoothly. Also, I added a stub marker for the article. Doughboy 23:09, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Doris Stokes

message: I have changed 'professional' to self-styled in the lede. Medium is clearly not a profession, even if the activity is carried on for profit. I have also qualified the claim that Stokes had this ability at all. The well-sourced Controversy/Debunking section lists many examples of fraud throughout her career. Hanoi Road (talk) 17:55, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to Lede 

message: Are you kidding me? Who wrote that! 2A00:23EE:1930:3C2B:49B1:B570:BD4E:4082 (talk) 21:33, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "...to achieve the effect of communicating with the dead"
Talk:Blackfoot religion

message: Why is this page entitled "Mythology"?  Perhaps "Religion" or "Spiritualism" would be a better name?  Mnmazur (talk) 00:16, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Myths? 

message: The entire article was written from a believer's point of view. Not appropriate for any Wikipedia article about religion or mythology. I have changed it by adding phrases such as "is belived to be" and "is said to be". 
I have changed the sub-section titled "Miscellaneous" to "Other deities and spirits" because it seems to describe the sub-sections contents more accurately. --Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 13:40, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutral point of view
Talk:Concept lattice

message: Actually, concept lattices are part of concept theory, a subject introduced by R. Wille in the context of AI applications, and they have nothing to do with dimension.  Rather concept lattices arise from any relation (mathematics) in the same way that g rho x if g.x = x (fixed point under a group action) leads to the elementary Galois duality in (the trivial part of) Galois theory.  In general, concept theory can be useful in order to clearly appreciate that many relations in mathematics like orthogonality, etc., automatically give rise to a dual lattice which is often of genuine interest.  In interesting applications there are deeper facts about these lattices which must be proven using ideas outside concept theory itself.
I can write a more extensive WP article when I have time, based on the expository article I wrote when I was a graduate student. ---CH 23:10, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  N-dimensional? No
Category talk:Mythologies of the indigenous peoples of North America

message: :Category:Mythology of the indigenous peoples of North America is far preferable, or :Category:Indigenous mythologies of North America, though that title could take in Mormon mythology as well as pop culture, huh?  but this one's "not acceptable"; I wouldn't feel comfortable putting the various mythology cats of the Skwxwu7mesh, Haida, Nuu-chah-nulth in it, nor the Inuit etc....Skookum1 (talk) 17:40, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it appears no one's listening, I'll re-post this on the main Talk:NorthAmNative page but just to advise I've removed this cat from Canadian-space articles as it's entirely inappropriate; I'll rephrase what I said above: category is mis-named and should be "Mythology of the indigenous peoples of North America" as "Native American" is a misnomer for Canadian and Mexican peoples.Skookum1 (talk) 00:07, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: How about "Category:Mythologies of indigenous peoples of North America" (plural, not singular)? Also, would it be worth our while to have a "See also" to similar categories for Meso-america and South America... if such categories exist? CJLippert (talk) 14:59, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

text: I'd go with that - the plural - but I would prefer to see :Category:Mythologies of the indigenous peoples of North America .... "of the indigenous peoples"....just a stickler for grammar even in cat-names; "feels odd" without it.  Yeah and see alsos for Meso-America and South America; where to draw the North America/Meso-America line is an issueas ostensibly Meso-American civilizations/people include the Purepechua (Tarascan) as well as Aztec, Zapotecx, Mixtec; in geography terms the "boundary" is the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, i.e. with Central America, but "Meso-America" means something different.....Skookum1 (talk) 15:24, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And just to note sub-cats within that should be by ethno-linguistic region rather than by political units, e.g. "Pacific Northwest Coast, "Northwest Plateau", "Sub-Arctic", "Plains" etc.Skookum1 (talk) 15:25, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

text: We have been through this many times before: indigenous peoples is cumbersome but the general compromise. But Native American is not a misnomer for Canadians and Mexicans (or Central and South Americans) - it is just the American English term. It is American as in 'the Americas', not as in 'United States of America'. Rmhermen (talk) 17:52, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename
Talk:Long-range dependence

message: Currently all the images in this article seems to be redlinks - can someone knowledgeable about Wikipedia check to see if they have been renamed, deleted or what... --Neo 21:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: This article conflates heavy-tailed distributions with long-range dependency. One can cause the other, but there is no inherent logical need for a heavy-tailed distribution to be caused by long-range dependency effects. -- The Anome 23:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The definition given here for a heavy-tailed distribution, although it is used by a few authors, is not the commonly used definition, and excludes heavy-tailed distributions such as Weibull, Log-normal, and many more.  See the heavy-tailed article for more information.  PoochieR (talk) 09:30, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a rewrite 

message: I have moved a large slice of what was here to Self-similar process as it did not fit well under this title, which has a rather more general meaning. Melcombe (talk) 17:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved large section 

message: Added redirects and disambig corrections for the more current terms, wiki had no mention of LRD in disambigs, and their LM links all related to neurons etc. BTW, as Engineers we often use H=.5 as a rule of thumb, perhaps it comes from Brownian?! Pseudo random cellular automata also use the value, so I think both editors above are correct, and it certainly CAN go higher in calcs by CAS systems and matrices. Pdecalculus (talk) 19:42, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long memory
Talk:Xerogel

message: what is this horse-shit?  there's no copyright infringement here.  hell, the article barely is more than one sentence long.  someone please kill yourself now to appease the gods (like me) you have pissed off with this childish behavior.
: I added the copyvio tag. Even though it was only a sentence long, it was an exact copy of copyrighted material. It was cited, but if Wikipedia were to strip one-sentence definitions, even duly quoted, from all over the internet, that wouldn't be cool. Surely this can be rephrased. ―BenFrantzDale 00:18, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just added my own definition.--Primetime 03:50, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio
Template talk:EUN

message: For the time being, I have changed the flag image used in this template to :Image:Olympic-rings.png, as, IMO, both of the two .svg versions---:Image:Olympic rings.svg and :Image:Olympische Ringe.svg---have an unsuitable background color; too much of a dark grey tone. I'll fix this as soon as I get around to installing a .svg-handling drawing program (by all means, feel free to beat me to it...). --Wernher 23:35, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The background is not dark: it's transparent and show the background of the given page --Berkut 20:37, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OIC, thanks! I guess we need a version of the .svg image with a white background then, suitable for using as an iconic "flag" in, e.g., medal tables; the Olympic flag/banner's background is, after all, white. I'll try and check if we have such a version already, or make one myself. --Wernher 05:29, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the template to use :Image:Flag of the Olympic Movement.svg (22px) which seems to me to be the most appropriate and also reasonably visually pleasing.  Andrwsc 23:00, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, the image is fair use, so can't be used in template space. -- Jonel | Speak 18:56, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Could someone draw a flag for free use or is that impossible? On a side note, this image seems pretty redundant to the one you removed. Punkmorten 07:51, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image needs cleaning up/fixing

message: There have been a number of recent edits by user SndrAdrss to this template. It looks like these may be attempts to restore it to a similar state to other IOC-code templates, with the flag, etc. However, the net result is a broken template that does not display properly. I support fixing this template to look like the other ones, but as this template is included on a lot of other pages, I think that revisions to it should be perfected (and previewed!) before they are made final. Eron 15:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: :Image:Flag_of_the_Olympic_Movement_(bordered).svg is a non-free image and must not be used in templates. Kotepho 07:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 19:49, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-free image

message: Please change
 Unified Team
to
 Unified Team
Category:Olympics flag templates

which will remove it from the list of uncategorized templates. Frietjes (talk) 21:04, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --Redrose64 (talk) 22:19, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 1 June 2012
Template talk:Politics of Australia sidebar

message: The Australian Coat of Arms is protected by copyright, and as sush its appearance on the template is incompatible with Wikipedias fair use policy. Do not add it to the template.--nixie 23:37, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The copyright expired a while ago... See the rationale at :File:Australian_Coat_of_Arms.png twilsonb (talk) 06:19, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright for Coat of Arms 

message: Any reason why there are no links for the elections between 1903 and 1969 inclusive?  The articles exist.  --  Jack of Oz  ... speak! ...  03:01, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it's too clunky having them all there. Timeshift (talk) 03:02, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added 1903 - 1974 like Template:Politics of Australia - what do you think? twilsonb (talk) 13:25, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 1903 to 1969 elections?

message: THis is just plaain disrespectful to the rightful owners of this country, our flag needs to be on their asw ell.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.7.245.113 (talk) 11:50, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As well as, or, instead of? I see attempts to remove the Australian coat of arms. If you wish to genuinely engage in editing then please talk here, otherwise it will just give the appearance of trolling. Thanks. Timeshift (talk) 05:57, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHY ISNT THE ABORIGINAL FLAG ON THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!
Talk:Sandra Keith

message: Per WP:CITE, it is important to understand the difference between a "External links" section, and a "References" section.  "External links" is like "Further reading".  Its not critical to the article, and is just there for extra information.  Often its for non-independent sources of information, or sites that are simply of interest.  If a link "goes dead", it may be removed from "External links", without much consideration.  It's "no big deal" to remove a link from "External links".  The article is not dependent on them.  The "References" section is the source where information is gathered from.  Reliable sources are mandatory for all information in an article, and its compulsory to say where information is obtained from.  No fact should be entered into the article, unless its backed up with references.  A link should never be removed from "References" as long as facts based on it remain in the article.  Even if the link goes dead, it should be preserved, with efforts to re-find it, or replace it.  Sadly, many articles don't have a "References" section, but all are supposed to.  --Rob 23:44, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think of References and External links at the same IMHO, unless it's footnotes, those belong in a References section. Ardenn 23:47, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Rob is right. Melchoir 22:27, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Muzzy

message: Early Advantage is not a subsidiary of the BBC. 128.122.253.196 03:00, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distributor 

message: Is the word "Muzzy" some kind of portmanteau (e.g. Monster + Fuzzy)? Is it a correct guess? --Yuriy Lapitskiy 22:29, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[portmanteau]]? 

message: They have already fixed the commercial so it does not have this part in it anymore.  At the opening, you see two children speaking a little Spanish.  Then, a woman says, "Those children are not Spanish, They're American!".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.212.180.150 (talk) 07:48, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Funny commercial for Muzzy showing on public television here  

message: I added the Esperanto names for the characters from the first set, but I'm not sure if they even made an E-o version of the Level 2 tapes.  Does anyone know for sure?
--Enwilson (talk) 23:40, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Esperanto names 

message: Could someone please fix it?  I don't know how, thanks!68.148.164.166 (talk) 10:37, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extra Space At The Top Of The Article 

message: why is Muzzy a disambiguation page, two of the links lead to two different Muzzy films, but the talk page is all about Muzzy the show?  i would think the two Muzzy film pages should be merged and this discussion be moved to Muzzy (films). Quickmythril (talk) 15:42, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk about Muzzy on DAB page?
Talk:Battle of Hansan Island

message: "I wonder if your assertions in the "Aftermath" section, comparing Hideyoshi's plans to those of Imperial Japan hundreds of years later, are not assuming too much. While it certainly seems feasible, and a number of scholars may even have put forward the same theory, it seems like a bit of a stretch to me."
:: Do you mean all the comments about Hideyoshi's designs on Asia?  That's very well documented in letters to not only daimyo, but also minor kings of islands and even the Spanish governor of the Philippines.  He threatened to invade the Philippines several times.  To historians that understand the era and Hideyoshi's ambition in 1592 it's not far fetched.  Had he have conquered Korea and Northern China, he would of made a move to conqure the Philippines, EXACTLY what happened just before Japan attacked Pearl Harbor.  WangKon936 09:30, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Aftermath Section 

message: "Firstly, you assert that this was the first time a Japanese commander of Wakizaka's caliber is recorded as fleeing a battle. You may be correct; I cannot think offhand of any particular examples of earlier retreats. But I find it hard to believe that this assertion is true."
::I had a former Indiana University professor who now works for the Department of Defense confirm the statement for me.  It's true.  WangKon936 09:07, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've deleted the references to Wakizaka's retreat as it is not very informative even if it was true. WangKon936 08:23, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wakizaka's Retreat 
Talk:Bob Mellish

message: Are you sure about this? He doesn't seem to have been an SDP type to me. He was on the right of the Labour Party, but in an Old-old labour way, not a liberal way. Flagboy 23:55, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The first external link, the obit by Tam Dalyell, claims that he joined the SDP but regretted it. Mtiedemann 09:33, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mellish joined SDP 

message: The infobox had him in the Liberal Democrats from 1986 to his death, but the Lib Dems did not exist until the Liberals merged with the majority of SDP in 1988 so this is impossible. The article seems clear that he joined the SDP in 1986 so I have changed the party details in the info box to have him as a Lib Dem from 1988 and SDP 1986 to 1988. However I also noted that he ceased to be a Labour Party in 1982, not 1986 as the infobox implied. The article suggests he was an Independent when he first went to the House of Lords in 1985 and sat as a Independent in Parliament in 1982 after resigning from Labour. As he campaigned against the official Labour candidate in the 1983 Bermondsey by-election and supported the Real Bermondsey Labour candidate John O'Grady, I am assuming he would not have been readmitted to Labour prior to his joining the SDP and have therefore noted he was Labour prior 1982 and an Independent 1982-1986 as this would seem to be what the article and available evidence suggests. Dunarc (talk) 23:42, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Party affiliation 

message: Is there a better source for this quote than Mark Steel? He's not exactly an unbiased source when it comes to an old-school right-wing Labour man such as Mellish, is he? Indeed he's not even a credible source. In the very next paragraph he states Mellish and John O'Grady toured Bermondsey singing an anti-Tatchell song; O'Grady certainly did, but I don't know of any evidence Mellish did. FieldOfWheat (talk) 08:05, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "I have never been an anti-racialist"
Talk:Central High School (Grand Junction, Colorado)

message: looking good god Victuallers 19:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I'd imagine a secondary school being much smaller. PoisonBFMV80816 (talk) 23:59, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: A secondary school provides secondary education. It has nothing to do with size. Meters (talk) 00:16, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secondary school? I don't think so. 

message: Because there is so much unreferenced information it's hard to tell whether any of it is current anymore. Adding citation markers. KeeYou Flib (talk) 22:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theres a lot of unreferenced information