Talk:European Robotic Arm

message: I erased the image shown on top, because it gives a wrong idea of the robot in action, because it shows the arm attached to a fictional space station. In fact, you can even read the phrase "Computer model of the ERA at work on the ISS", thats not the ISS!!
--200.117.120.238 (talk) 01:22, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not fake, just heavily outdated. It shows how it would have worked on the long since cancelled Science Power Platform --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 09:38, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAKE image 

message: Can someone provide a image of one of the basepoints (and/or grapple fixtures) on the ROS that will be used by the ERA, and possibly some description?
95.119.235.151 (talk) 22:53, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: And a list of diagram of where they all are would be helpful. (and can ERA use the PDGFs on Zarya and the US segment ?) - Rod57 (talk) 10:38, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basepoints and grapple fixtures  

message: (Page 319) http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20140008875.pdf
--Craigboy (talk) 22:10, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good. "The European Robotic Arm: A High-Performance Mechanism Finally on its way to Space", p319-334 of the 554p PDF. Lots of images and detailed text. (maybe it was published somewhere by itself) - Seems to say that (in 2014) it was expected to be launched in 2015. - Rod57 (talk) 10:51, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info 

message: Project Status has long gaps/delays 2005-2010, and 2010-2021. - Could expand into a history section explaining the delays and how the concept or purpose has changed. eg. Was the late launch in 2021, primarily due to it being planned to launch on the MLM in 2015, and then the launch of MLM/Nauka was postponed - and there was no other way to ship ERA to ISS, or are all the mounting points for ERA (or a required control station) on the MLM so there was no point in ERA being shipped earlier ? - Rod57 (talk) 12:17, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of delays 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
* 
* 
* 
You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:09, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: I'm hoping everyone is fine with how much I've changed the article. I felt that I was a large mess, and need the information to be updated or corrected. The inclusion of a proper history section I hope will improve the article.
James Denesuk (talk) 21:24, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radically Changed Article 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
* 
* 
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:38, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
*  ()
*  (discussion)
*  (discussion)
*  (discussion)
*  (discussion)
*  (discussion)
*  (discussion)
*  (discussion)
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:47, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:17, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion