Talk:Hutchison Whampoa

message: Just like to point out that two thirds of this article consists of Whampoa's "strong links to the Communist party" and plots by the company to control the Pentagon and Panama Canal.  One sentence (and a short one at that), is devoted to the opposing point of view.  I'd also like to point out that many of the "sources" listed are arch-conservative think tanks and organizations.  There aren't any quotes from people who are actually innvolved with the company.Also like to point out that the source of the "declassified intelligence report" is judicialwatch.org, one of the "conservative critics of China."  Now I'm only an innocent reader, but it occurs to me that it would be a whole lot more factual if this "declassified intelligence report" were taken from an actual goverment institution's website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.247.174.215 (talk • contribs) 
:I've removed the section on the intelligence report, as the credibility of the source is in question.  Would be rather different if they provided a copy or a link to a copy of the document itself.  The section says the material is in a report, however, the single link is only enough to back up a claim of "Group X claims that Report Y contains ...", which gets a little tenuous. 81.104.165.184 16:31, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias? 

message: The link to founder John Hutchison is not correct.  That person is someone else.  Anyone have information on the actual founder?  JXM 07:07, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founder? 

message: I have reverted this edit twice now.  WP:MOSLINK says "The use of links to other Wikipedia articles, for example, Ant, is encouraged. Use the links for all words and terms that are relevant to the article."  Can you please explain why you keep removing internal links?  There is a three-revert-rule which attempts to solve these edit disputes be encouraging discussion. —Dgiest c 03:17, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unlinking

message: ===Previously involved editors===
;Comment by Dgies
I am having a content dispute with  over whether to include internal links in the article.  The reason I've made a RFC is I've had no luck communicating with this person and would like the opinion of an outsider per Wikipedia:Dispute Resolution procedures.  The diffs we're revert warring over are this versus this.  I'd be amenable to a compromise version but like I said,  has been uncommunicative. —dgiestc 16:00, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for Comments

message: ;Comment by Dgies
I am having a content dispute with  over whether to include internal links in the article.  The reason I've made a RFC is I've had no luck communicating with this person and would like the opinion of an outsider per Wikipedia:Dispute Resolution procedures.  The diffs we're revert warring over are this versus this.  I'd be amenable to a compromise version but like I said,  has been uncommunicative. —dgiestc 16:00, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Previously involved editors

message: ;Comment by Smee
My thoughts are thus:  There is currently no "References" section in the article, which I will add now.  External links generally should not be included in the article itself, but rather in citations.  Links to the company itself as citations should be as limited as possible, and citations instead provided from reputable secondary sources.  However, 1-2 links to the company's main Web site may be included in the External links section.  Smee 22:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Previously uninvolved editors

message: Does Hutchison Whampoa in reality run the Panama Canal? According to the article they have some activity there, but I'm wondering whether this truly reflects the extent of their influnce? __meco (talk) 14:35, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Running of the Panama Canal 

message: Tisztelt Hölgyem/Uram!
Érdeklődöm,hogy Magyar állampolgárként dolgozhatnék-e az önök cégénél?
10 éve dolgozom egy Japán cégnél Magyarországon egy Kaizen csoportban.
Válaszukat megköszönve:Kovács Attila
kovacs.attila@indamail.hu  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.226.249.202 (talk) 07:36, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Érdeklődés 

message: I have removed a sentence opposing the viewpoint og the Burma Campaign UK. The reference for the opposing viewpoint was to a porn site. Enough said.
Madchine (talk) 21:06, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: The article lede starts: "Hutchison Whampoa Limited (HWL) is an investment holding company based in Hong Kong. It was a Fortune Global 500 company and one of the largest companies listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange." Note is an investment holding company and was a Fortune Global 500 company; the rest of the lede continues to refer to the company in the past tense. The second paragraph may be a clue (it describes a merger) but by this time the damage has been done and the reader is unsure whether the company still exists or not in any form. Could this be re-cast by someone who understands what's going on, please? Tonywalton Talk 22:56, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing tenses in lede 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Hutchison Whampoa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081016000833/http://www.burmacampaign.org.uk:80/dirty_list/dirty_list_details.html to http://www.burmacampaign.org.uk/dirty_list/dirty_list_details.html#h
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:37, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified