Talk:Good Shepherd

message: Why is this considered a Parable? It isn't. it's a metaphor. there aren't any parables in John. if this is a metaphor, why aren't all the "I am" statements parables?
:I agree completely that this title should be rehanged. I have at least two scholarly sources that do not consider this a parable:
::Raymond Brown's Into to the NT "In the narrative sequence the metaphorical discourse on the good shepherd (10:1-21), although it has a certain autonomy, is directed to the Pharisees whom Jesus accused of being blind in 9:40-41. This and the description of the vine in 15"1-17 are the closest that John comes to the parables so common in the Synoptics. In John there is a mixture of metaphors offering different ways of looking at the same reality: Jesus is the gate by which the shepherd goes to the sheep, and by which the sheep come into the fold and go out to masturel and Jesus is the model shepherd who both knows his sheep by name and is willing to lay down his life for them." p.348 and he cites a work called "The Shepherd Discourse of John 10 and Its Context". Then on pages 364-5 "A comparison of the Fouth Gospel to the first three Gospels shows obvious differences. Peculiarities of John include: ... long discoursed and dialogues rather than parables". And Ehrman's NT "In John, however, Jesus does not speak in parables, nor does he proclaim the imminent appearance of the kingdom. He instead focuses his words on identifying himself as the one sent from God." p. 162
:However, we should acknowledge in the article that it is sometimes called a parable, althought technically some scholars do not consider it such. Before I am too bold in moving this article, does anyone agree? Should we just move it back to where it was before, or do we have any better names?--Andrew c 18:04, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Regardless if we personally think that a metaphor and a parable are the same thing, we have scholarly dispute over this. NPOV says we cannot take sides on a matter, especially when two very prominent biblical scholars, in their college level introductory texts on the NT say the same thing. I propose moving this article back to where it originally was, The Good Shepherd (religion), and if necessary have a few sentences explaining the conflict. Maybe someone could dig up some reliable sources that explain how these verses are a parable, because I've got sources for the other side. Is there any reason not to move this article?--Andrew c 15:08, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What does this sentence mean:
In the surrounding context of the allegorical story of the Good Shepherd (John 9:35-41 and John 10:22-30) depicts the people around Jesus realized that he was asserting that he was God.
It reads like it's grammatically incorrect.
Arnob 01:14, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this sentence mean 

message: This article is massively inadequate and misrepresentative. As the following Wiki article explains, the idea of a god as shepherd existed CENTURIES before Jesus -- most commonly in the form of Hermes carrying a lamb around his neck. In art, such depictions are known as the Kriphoroi:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kriophoros#Kriophoroi_and_.22The_Good_Shepherd.22
76.113.64.124 (talk) 14:33, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that is alluded to in the Pagan symbolism section, if you have reliable sources then it would be great if you added to that section with explicit reference to how prior iconography/myths had an influence on the christian myth GrassHopHer (talk) 21:27, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

text: It is clearly covered in the art section too. But since the ram (not lamb) carried by at least the early Kriophoros figures was to be sacrificed not protected, the idea is not not really the same. Johnbod (talk) 01:50, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  An Idea Stolen From the Greeks 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Good Shepherd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130123195323/http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Gospel_Of_St_John to http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Gospel_Of_St_John
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:20, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified