Talk:Anzac biscuit

message: I moved the page to singular title--ZayZayEM 06:26, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: 2004 comment

message: Can someone provide a reference for the "Reinvented in NZ" comment?  Sounds kinda partisan, like the Pavlova origin controversy  Shermozle 11:12, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)
What is the relevance of Dunedin?  Anzac biscuits may be derived from a Scottish recipe, but that has nothing to do with Dunedin - there are Scots all over New Zealand and Australia.  My grandmother - a girl during the First World War - had a recipe book dating from about 1917/1918 that has a recipe for Anzac biscuits.  It was published in New Zealand.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.197.15.138 (talk) 10:30, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 2005 comment

message: This sounds like it was added by someone from either Australia or New Zealand with slightly too much support for their country and no proof of the statement.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.73.109.153 (talk) 08:48, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contest of Origin between NZ and AUS

message: The article states vaguely "The term ANZAC is protected under Australian law". Does this mean trademarked, protected by statute, or copyright? How does this affect its use outside Australia?
The words "and therefore the word should not be used without permission" sounds too much like POV, and permission is supposedly to be obtained "from the RSL" - do the RSL really have control over this brand?
"and its misuse can be legally enforced" doesn't make sense.
Can anyone give an authoritative and supported revision of this please? DavidFarmbrough
: On 31 August 1916 the word 'Anzac' was protected by law to prevent its exploitation for business or trade purposes  and More info: 
There should probably be a mention of the popularity of the biscuits in show competitions, bake sales, and general home cooking. 202.171.170.2 16:41, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legal protection? 

message: It is DISRESPECTFUL to use the uncapitalised form of ANZAC. 
It is an ACRONYM not a word and thousands of ANZACs died honouring the legends of the ANZAC it is not for some GenY upstart to change that because they think it needs to be modernised. 
Please show some proper respect and amend the article accordingly.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I eat Anzac biscuits (which have rolled oats etc. in them). ANZAC biscuits (to me at least) sound like they are made out of fallen ANZACs. I think Anzac (non-capitals) is the modern adjective for things relating to the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps. Any thoughts?
Matt (talk) 02:04, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. There's been a discussion regarding this on the 'Anzac Day' page - the vote was unanimous by about ten editors to none that 'Anzac' is the correct capitalisation, both historically and grammatically. 'ANZAC' stands for Australian and New Zealand Army Corps - in other words it refers to a military unit, a 'corps' generally consisting of two divisions. There is therefore no such thing as 'ANZACs' either. The soldiers were referred to as 'Anzacs'.  Hayaman (talk) 05:41, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was the instigator of the latest move from ANZAC Day (using capitals) to Anzac Day - for the reasons variously reported on the talk page. I could see an argument for  "ANZAC biscuit" being a biscuit baked for members of the ANZAC units (where ANZAC is a noun describing another noun, like "school bus" is a "bus for school"... hence, "ANZAC biscuit" is a "biscuit for the ANZAC unit"). However..... to me it would make slightly more sense for the term to refers to "a biscuit for Anzac(s)", ie, using the non-capitalised version in the adjective sense to describe a concept/group. A long winded way of saying.... I think "Anzac biscuit" is probably more appropriate. PalawanOz (talk) 07:42, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hardly authoritative... but Arnott's uses the "Anzac Biscuit" variant here PalawanOz (talk) 07:43, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Unfortunately the link provided above by Hayaman is 'broken'--220.101.28.25 (talk) 06:47, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ANZAC versus Anzac 

message: It is important to take a conservative approach when interpreting recent findings and research. I don't feel that such an approach has been observed at times in this article. For example it is stated that the first time the word 'Anzac' appears in the name of the biscuit was in the ninth edition of the 'St Andrew's Cookery Book'. This is however not definitive, but rather the earliest known instance of the use so far discovered. Reading the referenced article outlining Professor Leach's research it is stated in it that the first published recipe so far discovered for anything with the title of 'Anzac biscuits' is, as is the case of the first use of the name 'pavlova', to be found in Australia. It was however a recipe for a different biscuit, but a point still worth inclusion in the main article I would have thought. Also it is noted that in this same recipe book ('The War Chest Cookery Book') the prototype of today's Anzac biscuits can be found under the name 'Rolled Oats Biscuits'. There is no mention of these being unique to Dunedin. So the prerequisites for the possible renaming of the rolled oats biscuit to the Anzac clearly existed in Australia. The point to note here is that the level of effort put into researching the origins of the Anzac biscuit would seem to be heavily weighted in favour of NZ. I might be wrong in making such an assumption, but it does seem to me that if the chief source of information from the Australian side of the story is gleamed from the Australian National Dictionary then perhaps not a lot of contemporary research is being done there. If I am wrong on this, and if anyone knows of similar academic efforts being put into such research in Australia then they should point it out. Until and if a similar extensive analysis of Australian recipes of that time is done it can only be conjecture as to when the name was used correctly for the first time.Ernest the Sheep (talk) 00:43, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A slight bias to this article

message: The assertion that "The biscuit appears to be a variation of Scottish oat cakes" seems dubious. The inclusion of oats aside they bear scant similarity: the Anzac a sweet biscuit, the oatcake savoury and roughly fulfilling the role of bread or a cracker. There may well be a Scots influence in the origin but this needs citation and, if Anzacs truly did develop from oatcakes, this also needs citation to explain how the end result was so different. Mutt Lunker (talk) 01:07, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variant Of Oatcakes? 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:ANZAC which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 16:30, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: I always thought the reason for leaving out eggs was so the biscuits would keep from being sent from NZ (where as eggs would go off). I'm not sure on the actual science of it, but it certainly claims that in many cook books. (Baking for Blokes by Steve Joll for one example)--202.89.153.161 (talk) 03:10, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recipe  

message: I'm changing the all upper case ANZAC to Anzac, because the bulk of the references do not capitalise it. In particular, the official Australian Govt website "Protecting the word Anzac" doesn't use all caps. Mitch Ames (talk) 11:09, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ANZAC --> Anzac 

message: Anzac ginger biscuits from 1916 ->http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/58013699
Soldiers letter ->http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/67485518
Anzac biscuits ->http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/58043393
Theodore D (talk) 10:01, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Early recipes

message: At present the article says the Anzac biscuit originated in both Aus and NZ. However, new research has found an earliest named recipe for the Anzac biscuit in an Oz newspaper.http://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/news/article.cfm?c_id=6&objectid=11194834 Now, I realise some Kiwi Wikipedians might think it a bit on the nose if Oz is allowed to claim sole ownership based on this one recipe. Especially when this may not be the last word, and anyway the recipe already existed in both countries prior, just with a different name. Yet, this is exactly the situation happening over at the pavlova dessert article. Any suggestions on what to do about this inconsistency would be good. Thanks! Theodore D (talk) 07:56, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anzac biscuit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725044226/http://www.britishlegion.org.uk/about-us/media-centre/news/fundraising/anzac-tea-dance-to-raise-funds-for-the-royal-british-legion to http://www.britishlegion.org.uk/about-us/media-centre/news/fundraising/anzac-tea-dance-to-raise-funds-for-the-royal-british-legion
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:02, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: What the hell does that mean???
what's the difference between the two in that part of the world? 94.134.203.232 (talk) 10:21, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "so long as they are sold as biscuits and not cookies."