lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:NeoGAF

message: I hope whoever wrote that part noticed the date of the referenced article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.236.192.149 (talk) 16:14, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section 

message: It doesn't contain a reliable source right away, but a watermark seems to be seen on the image, and shows Capcom quoting a message from NeoGAF. - A Link to the Past (talk) 05:40, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  An additional source? 

message: I don't think we need a section on the O/T forum, and especially not one the way it's written now. It is written as a howto on how you should behave on the forum, and not encyclopedic in tone. I removed the section again, and I would love to work on this, to see how we can fit it in. We need some secondary reliable sources on this one to make a good section out of it. Any hints would be appreciated! (linkdump: WP:TONE, WP:RS, WP:HOWTO, WP:NOT ) Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:24, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  O/T forum 

message: This article needs to checked for bias129.115.2.90 (talk) 03:34, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: bias

message: I've removed the text added repeatedly by one user relating to the above. The bias claim will need a reliable source from a major gaming site, rather than a niche blog that backs up the opinion of the editor, in order to justify the claim that this is the opinion of the "general gaming community". Viral marketing is not in and of itself a criticism of NeoGAF, since any user-driven site could be vulnerable; further, the referenced article shows the administrators were quick to inform the users of the community that they had banned the poster, and that they do not tolerate such behaviour. 62.56.61.170 (talk) 21:38, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias & Viral Marketing 

message: The criticism section is not properly sourced. This adds a long criticism section. Most of the material is completely unsourced (interestingly there is a citation needed tag from February 2016 although I see no sign of this material having been in this article in February). The one source supplied is nothing but a blog posting and is not a WP:RS. Meters (talk) 01:25, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism section 

message: Apparently, the site has been shut down because the owner Tyler Malka, has been accused of sexual assault:   .  Probably should say something in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.130.15.14 (talk) 14:58, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Site shut down
Talk:Reunification clause

message: ... to clean up some dodgy sentences. Wegesrand (talk) 15:41, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs copy-editing by a native English speaker 

message: Was is the content of these? Austria to be reunited with Südtirol, Hungary, Germany?-- Matthead discuß!     O       21:41, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Reunification Clauses
Talk:Cudworth, Saskatchewan

message: The philosopher Ralph Cudworth did not work on the railway in Saskatchewan.
You do not mention the nearby glider field which pilots in the area refer to as "Cudworth".
My maternal grandfather was active in the region in the late 19th Century prior to the founding of this town.
G. Robert Shiplett 00:03, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ralph Cudworth 
Talk:The Kush

message: I added an article from the NEWS section from the website of XXL (magazine). It's a major magazine and I think can be considered as a reliable source. MrBlondNYC 21:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Field of View

message: Just a question, what is the proper romanization of Asaoka's first name? The page currently gives it as "Yūya", although I've also seen it spelled as "Yuuya" as well as "U-ya" (which is the spelling given on the website). So...which of these is correct? Are they all correct? Calgary 02:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling question

message: Was it ever spelled out in Japanese katakana, with or without either Japanese- or English-style parentheses? Also, this should be mentioned in related articles, and perhaps in the title of this one if more documentation can clarify this issue. Thanks! —Geekdiva (talk) 11:25, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "(the)" in the band name
Talk:Fringe Product

message: the controversy section is copied word for word from http://jam.canoe.ca/Music/Pop_Encyclopedia/D/Dayglo_Abortions.html
142.46.135.202 21:50, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it as a likely copyright violation. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 17:43, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism
Talk:St. Mary's School

message: The following redlinks have been removed, they can be reinstated if any further references are created elsewhere on Wikipedia (see "what links here" for each one) – as per MOS:DABRL. - Fattonyni (talk) 12:32, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed links 

message: * St. Mary's School, Maitland - Fattonyni (talk) 13:41, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Australia
Talk:Brabant Lake

message: Maybe someone could address the fact that the place name is Dutch, and why that is so.    Heavenlyblue (talk) 21:01, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It could be noted also that the town's name is pronounced 'BRAY-bant', unlike the original Dutch name (approximately 'BRAH-bunt').    Heavenlyblue (talk) 02:06, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dutch name
Talk:Ralph A. MacMullan Conference Center

message: I don't really see a reason why this building needs a standalone article, when it has no noteworthy information of its own or historical designations.  It is part of North Higgins Lake State Park and should probably just be merged with that article. —Notorious4life (talk) 03:59, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge.  The article gets less than one median reader per day. Bigturtle (talk) 13:56, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 10:41, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Butia purpurascens

message: The palm pictured is NOT a Butia purpurascens. The perpurascens is a dwarf Butia, and the Butia that's up now is not a dwarf.--198.229.215.116 (talk) 07:03, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Completely agree, it is a B. odorata in the an English garden, I know the specimen/grower. Took 6 years, but I removed it. 86.83.56.115 (talk) 13:09, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: A Wikipedia user made up a name in 2006 for this plant. The earliest this name appears outside of Wikipedia is 2014 in a paper by Portuguese-speaking writers. Leo   86.83.56.115 (talk) 13:09, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Correction, first use of name outside Wikipedia at Rare Palm Seeds 2010-2011. Leo   86.83.56.115 (talk) 21:22, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common Name in English 
Talk:Charbonnel et Walker

message: There seems to be a piece of information missing. The Charbonnel AND Walker company dissolved upon the death of Mrs Walker in 1894, and no mention is made of when (or why or how) the current company was founded. It might have been that same year, or decades hence. Does anybody know? Simon (talk) 06:55, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was the company re-established under the current name? 
Talk:Mary Lucia

message: "Lucia is the younger sister of The Replacements front man Paul WesterbergShake-up in Radioland: The Current celebrates its first year ."
Why is this sentence always being removed? Is she not the younger sister of  Paul Westerberg? There seems to be plenty of refs for this fact and she is listed as such on Westerberg's page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.122.47.236 (talk) 18:35, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not a valid justification for removing information from Wikipedia. If information is noteworthy and properly sourced, there are very few legitimate reasons for it to be justified to redact. I haven't seen any such justification here. I'm sure that say, Elton John doesn't go around telling people that his birth name was "Reginald Kenneth Dwight", but regardless, that information appears in his WP article, because it's noteworthy and properly sourced. Bricology (talk) 01:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paul Westerberg's sister? 
Talk:Barisha, Kolkata

message: Hello fellow wikipedians, I want to say that Barisha is in Kolkata City/Kolkata Corporation/Kolkata Police Jurisdiction. But Barisha is in South 24 Parganas district, Not Kolkata district. Kolkata district is smaller than Kolkata City/Corporation/Police Jurisdiction area. Barisha falls under Behala Paschim Assembly/ Vidhan Sabha and Behala Purba Assembly/ Vidhan Sabha. According to Election Commission of India Report (Check Reference link 1 & 2), both the Assemblies are in South 24 Parganas. So, Barisha is in "Kolkata City" & "South 24 Parganas district". Besides South 24 Parganas district administration clearly says, KMC Wards starting from 101 are within South 24 Parganas district (Check Reference link 3). Moreover, the area of a City/ Corporation/ Police administration can be increased by the State Government, but the area of a District cant be changed without the Permission of Election Commission. Soumo Dutt 08:34, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  District of Barisha
Talk:OTS

message: This disambiguation page was marked for cleanup. i removed the following entries because they were redlinks without incoming links, or plain advertising:
* One-Three-Seven data transport protocol
* Object Transaction Service
* Of The Stars anorectal clinic
* Open Theme Standard, a specification for LiteStep themes
* OtsLabs, a company who produce the programs OtsDJ and OtsStudio, and the .ots audio file format (Web)
– sgeureka t•c 22:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Jodhpur Park

message: This article has just begin, Help to improve the article by adding more section and information. --Tito Dutta (Talk) 09:05, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improve The Article 

message: i'm worried about the tone used. " posh locality", and similar comments are a breach of neutrality and need to be addressed. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:46, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  article's tone
Talk:Yearby

message: I would like to thank all those who contribute to the Yearby Village wikipedia page. I would like to ask everyone to think about what they contribute or delete and wether it is appropriate. This great village deserves the recognition that this page gives.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sourlemonz56 (talk • contribs) 22:21, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Queen angelfish

message: :Queen Angelfish → Queen angelfish — Changing name to conform to WikiProject Fishes naming standards. In most cases, we should not capitalize common names. Steven Bidny (talk) 18:17, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is unambiguous. I'll move it. --Stemonitis (talk) 08:45, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

text: This article has been renamed per the above move request --Stemonitis (talk) 08:45, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Requesting someone make a distribution map of the species using this. Much appreciated. LittleJerry (talk) 03:45, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Range map
Talk:Open Content Alliance

message: Now that MSN has stopped its scanning efforts, is it still a member of the OCA? Fothergill Volkensniff IV (talk) 12:34, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: To answer my own question, the OCA website doesn't list "members", rather just "contributors" (past and present). Updated article accordingly. Fothergill Volkensniff IV (talk) 12:37, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Microsoft
Talk:Rōshigumi

message: According to the book Shinsengumi by Romulus Hillsborough, the Roshigumi left Edo for Kyoto on February 8 on the 3rd year of Bunkyu, or 1863. Another error was the funding of the Roshigumi was from the Daimyo of Aizu, not from the Shogun.
(JamesWalther1991 (talk) 06:15, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates and other stuff
Talk:Friedrichshafen FF.29

message: Does this text fragment actually add anything to the Development and design section?Nigel Ish (talk) 08:34, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not yet. Sorry, I forgot to put a construction notice on the article.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:44, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Five FF.29s were  in Denmark, designated"
Talk:Douglas Kinsella

message: This is entirely appropriate for the article and is sourced.  It also provides a link to his son Warren Kinsella, which in a biography is essential. I have reason to believe further that this was reverted in bad faith with an editor who has issues with the existence of this article, and lots of interest in the other article, Warren Kinsella. Barney the barney barney (talk) 17:30, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal life section 
Talk:Marathon (disambiguation)

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marathon_Watch_Company
:   The preceding heading and WP page address were added, w/o a sig, nearly 10 yrs ago, by an IP-address (i.e. non-logged-in) editor.--Jerzy•t 09:17, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest Inclusion: Marathon Watch Company
Talk:Hyophorbe lagenicaulis

message: If it isn't for water storage, then what is it? I just saw an old drawing (taken from H.W.Bates, The Naturalists on the River Amazon, 1910) where the trunks of the bottle palms are long and slender, perhaps 20 feet tall, with a 3 feet section at the middle that widens to more than 3 times the normal trunk width. What was evolution thinking?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.11.108.174 (talk) 03:40, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the bulge on the trunk for?
Talk:Friedrichshafen FF.31

message: B class. The introduction states: "Although primarily intended for reconnaissance duties" and "Although it was satisfactory for its intended mission". Please support both statements by cited sources in the narrative section. Thanks. Djmaschek (talk) 03:57, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Appreciate these sorts of comments. Keep it up!--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:03, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: B class review
Talk:Thuringian sausage

message: To my knowledge, Thuringian sausage is always made 100% of pork (neither beef nor veal -- we are not Bavarians).Toscho 17:48, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production 

message: "Mustard, preferably local, but never ketchup, is also the traditional condiment" - this is wrong. ketchup is allowed just as mustard.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.135.188.106 (talk) 11:06, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  mustard and ketchup
Talk:Latania verschaffeltii

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.nparks.gov.sg/FloraFaunaWeb/Flora/2/5/2586. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Declangi (talk) 05:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/User:R/Single Letter Group

message: As it should be. --MichaelLinnear 23:13, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Or not as many other users believe. Ryan Postlethwaite 23:16, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoever closes this MfD, I implore you to disregard the multiple Strong KEEP votes by the users associated with the group as a COI. —« ANIMUM » 19:11, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are also Strong KEEP comments from users who are not in the group.  And yes, for the sake of COI, I decided not to say "delete" or "keep", but to reply and leave comments. ([ →]O - RLY?) 19:20, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks, O. I just wanted to point out that such votes are biased if they come from group members. —« ANIMUM » 22:24, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Magnus animum, I would imagine that whoever closes this MfD will understand that your citation of WP:COI is invalid, as it primarily relates to financial interests and mainspace articles.  Otherwise, interested, involved parties are encouraged to engage in XfD discussions.  This is not a vote.  This is an attempt to build consensus.  Therefore, the concerns and issues brought up by everyone matter.  The support for and against deletion of the page is based on the statements of each individual in the discussion, not solely their usage of "keep" or "delete" or so forth.  In any event, if you believe that the opinions of any individuals should be struck in the discussion, I suggest you comment below their statements in the actual discussion.    j    talk   19:33, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm perfectly aware of that, J, what I was trying to state by "COI" was the fact that almost every user who is in the group will obviously vote (Strong) keep, ergo, while everyone is entitled to give their opinion, these are naturally biased. —« ANIMUM » 21:33, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  And another thing -- and I quote -- "COI editing involves contributing to Wikipedia in order to promote yourself or the interests of other individuals, companies, or groups. Where an editor must forego advancing the aims of Wikipedia in order to advance outside interests, he stands in a conflict of interest." "...in order to promote yourself or the interests of other individuals..." I'd like to direct your attention to that key phrase; if you are in the group, and you vote keep (I know, it's twisted, but logical) you are promoting either yourself, your peers in the group, or both simultaneously, you are indeed making a COI. It may talk mainly about articles, but it applies across the whole playing field. —« ANIMUM » 21:43, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, only one user voted Strong keep, and one member voted Delete. And they've all provided rationales that arent "OMG DONT DELETE THIS PAGE MEANIES!!!!" I  (said) (did) 22:00, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Son, AGF was the only thing preventing me from saying that. —« ANIMUM » 22:11, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Kwak (surname)

message: it's also a dutch name. Markthemac (talk) 16:25, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  dutch 
Talk:Soy molasses

message: We have received on OTRS the following:
"For a reliable and comprehensive peer reviewed reference on soy molasses, see
Daniel Chajuss, Soy Molasses: Processing and Utilization as a Functional Food, in
KeShun Liu, Editor, Soybeans as Functional Foods and Ingredients, AOCS Press,
Champaign. Ill., USA, pp. 201-208, 2004.  
Soy molasses is a low cost, amply available, industrial extract of defatted
soybeans, produced by warm aqueous alcohol extraction of defatted soybean material.
Soy molasses is manufactured since 1963 essentially in accordance to the teachings of
Chajuss in Israel Patent IL19168. Soy molasses encompasses mainly sugars as
oligosaccharides (stacchyose and raffinose), disaccharides (sucrose) and small amount
of monosaccharides (mainly glucose), crude proteins (including amino acids, peptides,
etc.), Crude Lipid Material (Including phosphotides and phytosterols) Minerals (Ash),
Saponins, Isoflavones and other organic constituents in small amounts.  Chajuss in
Israel Patent IL115110 and in US Patent US05871743 teaches novel uses for soy
molasses as a source of phytochemicals for prevention and amelioration of diverse and
variant pathological conditions. In Israel Patent IL140297 Chajuss teaches that
unique and novel precipitating sediment can be obtained when soy molasses is
treated at an acidic pH. The precipitating sediment obtained contains the soy
phytochemicals saponins, isoflavones, phospholipids, crude proteins material and
other sediment material from the soy molasses. For details see above noted reference
that contain more related references"
David.Monniaux 09:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Received by email
Talk:Secure Computing Corporation

message: This article is a blatent ad. This article is cleary biased towards the company in the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Miltonmonkey (talk • contribs) 01:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that covering the controversy and opposing point of view would give it more of a neutral stance. Tubularbells1993 (talk) 14:21, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I really think that the SmartFilter tool is by no means useful. Speaking from experience, it is extremely difficult to do research on my school laptop with it in place. I really think that the "Evils of SmartFilter" should be looked into and covered in detail here. I also feel it is worth noting that the article in question is blocked by the program. Tubularbells1993 (talk) 00:16, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Not-so)Smart Filter 
Talk:Jagdwurst

message: This is a difficult article to find refs from reliable English-language sources for, but please add any you find. There are plenty of German mentions, and plenty of mentions from people in English-speaking countries who are selling their own interpretation of a Jagdwurst, but we need better. The sausage itself is significant - it's a standard variety available all over Germany, Austria and Switzerland, not a niche product.   Guffydrawers (talk) 12:07, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: How exactly does a pocket knife fit into this article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.5.147.37 (talk) 05:08, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't find any proof that it should fit in the article, so removed it. Jagdwurst is a cold cut, not ideal for taking to work or taking hunting as it's in a thin skin and should be kept cool. Great in a sandwich or in a soup, but for outdoor pursuits like hunting the go-to sausages are dried, long-life varieties like Landjäger and Kabanossi. These don't need cooling (or cutting, if thin), just put in your pocket or backpack, and off you go. Where the name came from is the subject of much conjecture and the explanation in the German WP article that it's from meat scraps left in a carriage that accompanied huntsman is not conclusive, or, in my opinion, convincing.   Guffydrawers (talk) 12:07, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Pocket knife