lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Powell Peralta

message: Powel peralta had a definite cultural impact on the skateboarding world. Probably the most of any company other than Vans (warped tour) due to its videos and the Bones brigade. I have no frigging idea how to express that in an article or even begin to actually provide citations or evidence for it. If anyone knws a better way to go about that. 121.45.229.71 (talk) 02:54, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I will look at this, but it may not require a separate section, as it may have been covered in the main body of the article.--Soulparadox (talk) 08:47, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Cultural impact

message: This article is desperately in need of more citations, so if anyone wished to join the cause please feel free to do so.--Soulparadox (talk) 08:47, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations
Talk:Hill cipher

message: OK, I cropped a copy of that image, shrank it a bit, cleaned up a few glitches, and removed the figures. At the moment it's at the top of the page, since it's the only illustration for the article. But that kind of spoils the surprise (that the cipher was implemented mechanically). Securiger 08:30, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Image added

message: :One might naïvely think that the key size, in bits, is n2log226 or about 4.7n2. In fact, it is slightly less than this because not all randomly selected matrices are usable. A slightly less naïve view might guess that 1/2 + 1/26 of candidate keys would be unusable, reducing the keyspace by about 54%.
Wow, I didn't know encyclopedia articles could be this condescending.  I mean, what the fuck?  Since when do reference works pass judgment on what is "naïve"?  Does Britannica ever try to be this didactic and insulting? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.35.148.201 (talk • contribs) 07:01, 11 February 2006  (UTC)
: Feel free dive in and make whatever changes you think are needed. — Matt Crypto 14:39, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But there is nothing "insulting" or "condescending" about it. "Naïvely" or the "naïve approach" are standard phrases in mathematics -- and many other fields -- to indicate a method which omits various complications (usually, thereby becoming less accurate). And no-one is suggesting that you are naïve (the subject of the phrase is "one", i.e. some hypothetical person), still less that you are socially inept or some such thing. -- Securiger 04:22, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  nice 

message: There seems to be a hole in the description of the inversion of the encrypting matrix to get the decrypting matrix. The hole, specifically, is in the handling of the determinant value. For
example, I am not sure that it is obvious that the determinant value of 9^-1 should be handled as the value 3.
Jerry McCarthy (talk) 11:51, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inversion of the encrypting matrix for decryption. 
Talk:Monoceros

message: i think that monocreos is kind of confussing but seems interesting. Monoceros will help you learn a little bit more about the stars.
Should the photograph be reversed, left for right?Kinzele (talk) 03:59, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  monoceros

message: Can someone please fill in missing information in the chart?  I don't have a clue where to look.  Thanks!  --Bowlhover 03:50, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On the left side of Orion (or right, if your in far South). Your finding troubles will be fixed by the Astronomy/Constellations Task Force in future. Said: Rursus 18:59, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help! 

message: This subsection in the article begins: 'Monoceros is an almost invisible constellation, with only a few fourth magnitude stars.'
I do not believe that is the right way to start a Notable Features column on this constellation and would like to see a revision. Pomona17 (talk) 13:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable features 

message: Hi there. I deleted the following lines from the infobox:
 | neareststarname = Luyten's Star
 | stardistance = 12.37
According to Talk:Luyten's Star, it doesn't belong here. Unfortunately I can't provide a replacement... --BjKa (talk) 14:36, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nearest Star
Talk:Sertraline

message: In the body of the article under "pharmacology" it says that the half life is longer in women and shorter in men, but in the information at the top of the article it says the opposite. Which is true? This needs corrected by an expert. 91.125.189.168 (talk) 22:23, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting information re men/women
Talk:The Third Man

message: The article states that are at least two versions of the film, differing at least by which actor performed the voice over. 
According to IMDB, the two versions are described as follows:
IMDB also explains the two different narrations as follows:  
I don't think of IMDB as a valid source (wikipedia might consider it otherwise), because there are no citations offered. I offer the information above only to make it easier on others who wondered why there are these different versions of the film. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.37.19.240 (talk) 10:30, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The narrator on the UK release is not Carol Reed but is actually Graham Greene himself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.173.13 (talk) 23:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

text: Reed had intended doing the narration himself but Greene was visiting the set at the time and so Reed asked him to do it, and Greene did.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.10.249 (talk) 10:26, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Narrator — No Explanation? 

message: I saw this film on TV today in which there was no zither music, and the first appearance of Lime was anticipated by showing his disembodied face earlier on. What has happened? Seadowns (talk) 22:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: gosh. Literally NO zither music in the entire film? I cannot imagine this! Was the film otherwise as you would expect, ignoring the early Lime appearance you mention? I am quite baffled. A film expertwhich I am notmight know where to look for alternative versions ... cheers DBaK (talk) 09:09, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new version? 

message: See Martin Miller (actor) for his role as head waiter. Spicemix (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast
Talk:Open economy

message: Although not a stub, I think this article needs some expanding on. 24630 17:55, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Someone asked this as a unsigned title so I'll respond :). Since the end result of any activity is happiness, more consumption = more happiness so more consumption is a good thing. One can argue though that if this consumption comes at the cost of environmental capital (i.e. destroying the environment) then increases in consumption with this environmental cost is bad. --ShaunMacPherson 03:46, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  when increase in consumption for domestic goods, its good for country or not? 

message: Dr. Thisse has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Thisse has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:
*Reference : Toshihiro Okubo & Pierre Picard & Jacques-Francois Thisse, 2014. "On the impact of competition on trade and firm location," CREA Discussion Paper Series 14-05, Center for Research in Economic Analysis, University of Luxembourg.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 18:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Thisse's comment on this article
Talk:Webster's Third New International Dictionary

message: I wonder if a new article is necessary.  Last year I deleted what was here and consolidated the material at Webster's Dictionary.  I see someone has recreated this article, however.  PedanticallySpeaking 15:20, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's okay to have a separate article, but if so, it should definitely be longer than the section at Webster's Dictionary#Webster's Third New International. This should be the main article about Webster's Third, with just a brief summary at Webster's Dictionary. Or else this should be re-merged there and the redirect re-created. --Angr/ 18:02, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

text: I'm for keeping it all with Webster's Dictionary.  Unless someone plans major additions here, I'm going to redirect this to that article, as it was until a few weeks ago.  PedanticallySpeaking 20:44, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recreated 

message: This edition specifically has been the subject of two books and several articles, as well as being the most controversial dictionary of all time. Time for it to have its own article.—Chowbok ☠ 01:00, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-re-created
Talk:Webster

message: I propose a merger: I believe the page linked here, Webster (surname) should be deleted, all the names there put at the top of this page, Webster.  I think it is too easy to go to the Webster page and read right past Webster (surname), skipping past some very notable historical figures--and that while those with the first name Webster are allowed three lines of print.  I know that is where my eyes ran to, before scanning the entire article in vain for mention of Webster's Dictionary (hidden at the bottom), Noah Webster, or Daniel Webster.  Also, while I respect those named Webster, and as the contributions of those so surnamed continue to live on, I believe the primary use of the word "Webster" in the English language now refers to the dictionary of that descent, and as such should be noted at the top of the page, rather than the bottom.  What do you say? grubbmeister (talk) 21:02, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merger, Proposed Primacy

message: Looked at other surnames (last names) to see what is conventional. Howard was set up similar to this page with a link to Howard (surname) as a list of notable individuals with the surname 'Howard.' Smith is much like this page, similar to a disambiguation page; Smith (surname) is an article about the surname, while List of people with surname Smith is similar to the Webster (surname) page.  What did look helpful about the Smith main page is it also included a few individuals with the surname Smith, and I think I will employ that here, and see if it meets the needs of the article, while keeping with convention.  grubbmeister (talk) 01:22, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative Plan
Talk:Cathy Carr (singer)

message: Well, I've finally managed to pinpoint her date of death from newspaper obituaries.  The funny thing is, they both say she was 63 when she died - not 52.  Does anyone have a source on her date of birth?  A bit of digging has found that she had a brother born in 1927, so is it possible that she was deliberately passing herself off as being ten years younger than she actually was? Don't get me wrong, I love her music, but this is starting to get fascinating...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Museumofinanity (talk •--Museumofinanity (talk) 03:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biographical gear
Talk:Maya mythology

message: The section with Mythological Themes had been removed by a vandal. I have restored it (hopefully in its latest version.)77.162.130.139 (talk) 20:30, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism Undone  

message: These paragraphs in particular:
"Yucatán is an equally important region. The Books of Chilam Balam contain mythological passages of great antiquity, and mythological fragments are found scattered among the early-colonial Spanish chronicles and reports, chief among them Diego de Landa's Relación, and in the dictionaries compiled by the early missionaries."
"In the 19th and 20th centuries, anthropologists and local folklorists committed many stories to paper. Even though most Maya tales are the results of an historical process in which Spanish narrative traditions interacted with native ones, some of the tales reach back well into pre-Spanish times. Now, at the beginning of the 21st century, the transmission of traditional tales has entered its final stage. This is also a time in which the Mayas themselves have begun to salvage and publish the precious tales of their parents and grandparents."
"The main problem with depictions is defining what constitutes a mythological scene, for any given scene might in principle also represent a moment in a ritual sequence, a visual metaphor stemming from oral literature, a scene from mundane life, or a historical event. It is, in any case, clear that the Twin myth – albeit in a version which considerably diverged from the Popol Vuh – already circulated in the Classic Period. In some cases, ancient Mayan myths may only have been preserved by neighboring peoples; the narrative of the principal Maya maize god, and, to a lesser extent, that of the Bacabs are cases in point. As the process of hieroglyphic decipherment proceeds, the short explanatory captions often included within the scenes will hopefully be restored to their original eloquence, and make ancient narrative come to life more fully."
I feel that part of the article is written by some Yucatan tour office, a historian sharing their opinion, or some Mesoamerica enthusiast. Someone maybe rewrite these to be more neutral in tone?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.98.32.19 (talk) 17:47, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fanpov? 

message: There is an inexplicable line in the article, "I messed up a document." Sure, I could simply remove it, but it could indicate other unwarranted changes on or around the same edit. I do not know how to find the edit in which this sentence appeared, so I'm letting the experts know and leaving it to them.--2604:2D80:DE12:A900:2DCA:F2EE:5A91:C85B (talk) 23:33, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Finnish

message: "Finn" means "Sami" in the Norwegian language? I've never heard about this or heard the word being used, and I'm Norwegian. Is that really true? --Spug 19:03, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Finnish have never in my knowledge refered to Sami. However, the origin for the name Lap (Sami) is believed to be from Sea Finns (sjöfinne) and  Lap Finns (lapfinne), both terming Sami in Danish, Icelandic and Norwegian sourcers.  //Rogper 18:55, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Talk:American Kennel Club

message: This section lacks some information.
For example, it states that the club moved to New York City in 1909 and incorporated.::Where did the club move FROM?     or::What city was the club founded in?
Also, has the club been at the same location/address since it moved to New York City?  If not, what locations/addresses has it been at?
And, what about the AKC's involvement in World War Two with "Dogs for Defense" (aka "Dogs for Defense, Inc." and "DFD") AND the establishment of the U.S. Army K-9 Corps?   (And by extension, the K-9 Corps in the other service branches?)
Just curious, but these are historical questions that I feel should be answered and included.  2600:8800:50B:6700:C23F:D5FF:FEC5:89B6 (talk) 03:01, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Hello , I have received your email, this is the appropriate venue for such queries so I am copying it here:
As articulated in my edit summary, WP:EL (and more specifically WP:ELPOINTS) says  Further, this entire section requires sourcing, as it is just a list of uncontroversial activities conducted by the AKC, their webpage is probably sufficient. Kind regards, Cavalryman (talk) 22:50, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scent work
Talk:Harlow

message: The lead image of the water gardens in the town centre is outdated. While living in this town, I can tell you these things about that photo:
*They've put a Costa within that Next
*The Pizza Hut has been replaced with a Five Guys (yes, I miss that location)
*Most recently, the Entertainer shop has moved out. We don't know what's gonna be there now as of writing this.
Might sort this out myself next time I get the chance... GOLDIEM J (talk) 18:12, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: New lead image

message: *  - needs a mention, and an article. KJP1 (talk) 06:17, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  mention/article now done, Our Lady of Fatima Church, Harlow. KJP1 (talk) 09:19, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Our Lady of Fatima
Talk:Peace camp

message: 68.232.240.214 has vandalised this wiki with his or her political opinions that violate the impartiality of Wikipedia. 
--Scuiqui fox 19:18, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: I am thinking of changing the article to Protest camp then it could include the road camp movement, including coverage of Fairford (Swampyetc) and of this. Any objections? SqueakBox 14:07, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Burger

message: Since there was no consensus reached on Hamburger's talk page, I am removing the  merge tags and leaving the pages where they are. ConDemTalk 13:31, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Result

message: A new merge proposal came up in September, after the earlier one was removed in April.  There is a considerable amount of overlap between this article, hamburger, and the others listed above.  The only things in this article that is so generic as to warrant coverage seperate from the hamburger article are this article's treatment of other meats and the United Kingdom section, which .  I propose that burger be moved to patty, to use the more common term, and be stripped of any reference to condiments and bread outside of its introductory paragraph, leaving that to hamburger.  Should also fix redirects that point to this page that ought to point to hamburger, after the move.  Would also have to clean up Hamburger's treatment of other meats/meat substitutes and introduce links to this article post-move. MrZaiustalk 21:32, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So much for discussion.  Created Patty with non-duplicated data after someone deleted Burger.  Will clean up further. MrZaiustalk 20:10, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge/Move

message: Proposed remerge: Several months ago, this article was deleted without discussion, ignoring the discussion of a proposed move to patty.  After the article was deleted, I copied it's contents over there anyway, as all coverage of *burgers had been moved to hamburger.  However, it seems to have been recreated, and with essentially the same text.  I believe the redirect to hamburger should be reinstated, and that hamburger should be moved to burger.  
Before the proposed move to patty, there was a proposal that burger and hamburger be merged.  The data in burger that didn't really belong in the hamburger article is all duplicated in a more appropriate place now, and hamburger covers far, far more than simple hamburgers.  Porkburgers, chickeburgers, etc are all covered in that article.  To the best of my knowledge, only veggie burger and burgerless burger stand as seperate articles from hamburger.  If this article is moved to patty again, that would free up this name as a more appropriate place for the hamburger article.  Thoughts? MrZaiustalk 20:24, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Remerge

message: BURGERS ARE BAE  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Budgey2004 (talk • contribs) 20:01, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 January 2018 

message: This article is being affected by vandalism and should be reverted to a previous version. Charo m (talk) 18:45, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism  
Talk:It's Walky!

message: Now that the strip is over, a large majority of the charcters should go under the "Deceased", however this would sort of destroy the point of having the categories to begin with (the only living "bad guy" would be Monkey Master, and he turned good in the end anyway so it would be empty). Plus, we don't know how many (if any) of the characters were revived after the final battle. I therefore move that we get rid of the "Deceased" category and move them all somewhere else (possibly with a note saying they died within their description). Ruth goes to civilians, Dina goes to main characters, Anti-Joyce, Big Boss I, and Doc go to secondary characters. Dargon and Penny go to bad guys. Not sure where Beef should go. Anyone have any objections before I go through and change this?
:Go for it. Looks like the page was more or less based on Willis's cast page, which had that organization. It's not really suited for a general descriptive read. One could argue that Anti-Joyce should go with the "bad guys", but whatever. -- Cyrius|✎ 21:08, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've rearranged everything. I put both Beef and and Anti-Joyce under "Bad Guys". I also added a bunch of new info we have now that the final battle is over. -- Solanum 21:47, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

message: Please note that I merged content from Wiigii as per its VfD. I don't want to add an entire section for this term, so I renamed the "Acronyms" section to "Acronyms and terms". Please correct this as you see fit. --Deathphoenix 18:43, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged content from [[Wiigii]] 

message: Did It's Walky! ever have a crossover with College Roommates from Hell!!! ?  —Tamfang 23:21, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  Characters from CRFH have made cameo appearances in It's Walky!, and IIRC Joyce from the Roomies era has shown up in CRFH.  The only full-scale crossovers were with Melonpool in 2001, a crossover with Fans! in 2003, and a stealth crossover with Melonpool in 2004. --Carnildo 07:25, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  crossovers 

message: I know wikis are anal and all that, but I'd think Mike was brought back to life strictly for comic relief. Although it's a cute speculation that he was brought back in the same sort of chamber as Walky's, wouldn't it be better without any detail at all? --JeffreyAtW 22:09, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mike's resurrection
Talk:List of people executed in Utah

message: What about Kirkham in June 1958? Intrigue 21:00, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Perhaps this article should give some indication, at least by ref. to the reason Utah has
execution by shooting Blood atonement
:I'm also in favor of discussing that, but blood atonement is not THE reason for Utah's formerly unique method (incidentally, the article should mention that condemned convicts in the future will not get the firing squad, although others might have been gandfathered in).  If I have time, I'll add some refs to this article. In part, the firing squad was a carryover from the Mexican practice in the territory. When the Supreme Court upheld Utah Territory's firing squad, they made particular note of this fact. 
:Also, perhaps this article should be moved to "Capital punishment in Utah" or somesuch? Cool Hand Luke 18:12, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: rationale