lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Vernon Barford Junior High

message: I think someone's ought to include the Blues logo, and/or a picture of the school. Some pictures of some sporting events (e.g. Blues' Track and Field Day). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Want(ed) Faerie (talk • contribs) 19:30, May 18, 2006
Perhaps. If someone wants to write something relevant that explains the significance of the logo and can get the school to license the logo for use on Wikipedia then that would be okay. I may upload a picture of the school if I get around to it, but images of school activities probably wouldn't be that relevant, especially considering the difficulty in getting releases signed by anyone depicted in the image. The Geeklord 02:08, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: So this is what it has come to?  Not only are all high schools entitled to articles, but so too are junior highs?  Elementary schools next?  And after that, I guess, we'll be creating articles on individual classrooms within said schools.  Jeesh.  Unschool 04:14, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable?
Talk:Arthur W. Radford

message: This source, which is cited in a number of places in the article, cites Wikipedia and risks being a circular reference. Can the statements sourced to it be sourced to other places? –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:33, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Admirals of the World 

message: The solid red center ribbon in the lower row of the admiral's ribbon rack looks like a modern Good Conduct Medal ribbon, which puzzled me since his bio doesn't list prior enlisted service. It turns out it's the Order of the Bath ribbon which is quite uncommon in the U.S. military. Probably too detailed to be included in the article but thought I'd mention it here anyway. - Brianhe (talk) 00:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of the Bath ribbon 

message: :I just read this article and it was a "good read" so wanted to say --thanks and keep up the good work,  Otr500 (talk) 09:47, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good read
Talk:Positive control

message: This article is a mess.  It appears to be talking about a term with three (or only two?) usages, each of which merits its own section.  Each sentence makes sense - the article seems incoherent and possibly contradictory.  GRBerry 02:32, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. References are still needed, though. 66.229.160.94 09:27, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Negative control redirects to Scientific control, which does a good job of telling what N/P controls are. How about deleting this messy article, and fill in on the other one? --David Munch 16:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needed?
Talk:Alan Miller (game designer)

message: Really hideous page design. Needs subheadings, a picture, and less "wall of text" --Anonymous  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.5.23.98 (talk) 03:54, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Terrible formatting

message: Looking at the photo of Alan Miller in the link... god he hasn't changed his hair style in 20 years! (Typical geek :) --Jquarry 02:40, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 18:37, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Jawa Moto

message: 1) The Czech Republic/Czechoslovakia is not in Eastern Europe but in Central Europe.
2) Jawa began producing motorcycles before Czechoslovakia found itself in "Eastern Europe" (in the communist block.) Therefore I do not understand the relevance of the statement: "the most active East-European manufacturers."
for ever bike for ever values  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.21.49.162 (talk) 08:58, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: *The entire article is missing citations and footnotes, so there is probably lots of problematic information in there.  If you know of reliable sources, please do use them to correct the article.--Dbratland (talk) 16:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Geography, how active

message: By Vansh Tomar 103.62.94.180 (talk) 17:29, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revolution of Indian motor cycle's
Talk:Central High School (Fort Worth, Texas)

message: The Band section seems to have quite a bit of opinion statements. 
Finiks (talk) 07:35, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion 
Talk:Molly Wood

message: Please vote with  Merge ,  Neutral , or  Don't Merge  
Merge - Mike Beckham 04:15, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Voting

message: No! I came here to widipedia specifically looking for information on Molly Wood not The Buzz Report, which it seems is but one of many facets of Molly Wood's career. She is one of journalism's foremost technology experts, working for one of the world's primary technology news organizations. This is someone who briefs the world's mainstream media and appears on their TV shows. As journalist, this article was useful to me. What I needed to know was for *my benefit* and I fail to see where vanity comes into it. If anything, more information on Molly Wood could have been useful to me. This page should be radically expanded as soon as possible. 
Joolze
No, this page needs to be expanded upon and have additional info added.--LifeStar 02:50, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Other

message: This article was discussed on the Buzz Out Loud (26 July 2007) podcast.  A listener had sent in a screen shot of the page, including the section of "Why Molly Rules."  The hosts surmised that this section would be removed immediately, which it apparently has while I was typing this.  I'll just repaste it below for archival purposes.
Why Molly Rules
1.Funny
2.Smart
3.Tom Merritt Hater! JK 
4.Loves Jericho!
5.An Executive Editor (That's a Big Title!)  
6.Works at CNET
7.Loves TIVO 
8.She has a Wii! 
9.Gadget Lover
10.Because She's Molly!
11.She has a cylon baby
70.141.209.239 17:03, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Molly Rules 

message: Um, fairly sure this bit is all made up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.232.208.134 (talk) 13:46, August 30, 2007 (UTC) 
:Just wanted to warn people. Molly read the entire section and claimed it all to be true. Of course it was a joke, but be prepared. Trvr3307 20:28, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  'After college...' section 

message: She is not married to a man named I.P. Freely. This is an attempt to "show that wikipedia is broken". This is not vandalism to remove false/fraudulent information from an article. Vandalizing would be adding this information back into it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.1.223.132 (talk) 21:32, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I.P. Freely 

message: She is not from Possum Grape, Arkansas and does not have a Cylon baby or married to "Evil Galactic Overlord Xenu" thanks ...  Speer320 (talk) 01:06, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seriously 

message: Why was the section about her marriage removed? It's irresponsible to go around removing people's marriages from Wikipedia unless there is some basis for doing so. Hvatum (talk) 01:19, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: we have to be careful with personal info, please see wp:blp.  If a source can be found then we can add info. Dbrodbeck (talk) 01:38, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriage
Talk:Treble damages

message: 24.174.164.83 left this on the article page.
This is very unclear. Do treble damages include the actual damages, or are they in addition to actual damages? If someone has actual damages of $100, are treble damages $300 or are they $400 (actual damagages of $100 plus treble damages of $300)??
--Nucleusboy (talk) 01:57, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: $100 would be trebled to $300. I'll see if I can find a source. bd2412 T 03:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question left on article 

message: Unlike indicated, "some" is not a weasel word here: the sentence would become false if the word is omitted: then it would suggest that all governmens do, which is definitely incorrect. A true concern though might be that the statement is aspecific - but a full list of countries would be inappropriate as well. Rbakels (talk) 08:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weasel word
Talk:The Adventures of Sam & Max: Freelance Police

message: Regarding the recent edits concerning the Geek (whether it is pronounced and spelt "Da Geek" or "The Geek"): I have gone over the relevant sections in the first episode as requested, and feel it is almost impossible to tell the difference between a da (/duh/) or the (/thuh/) in that instance, although I can't hear any trace of a strong D sound at all. That, and the fact that all official documentation has never included a "da," but always "the Geek" or "The Geek" (see the current Nelvana Sam & Max webpage and the press kit from the series launch). Unless there is some reliable sources to the contrary, I will be reverting the changes back to their original form in a few days. – Quoth 00:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Geek 

message: Originally aired between "Tonight We Love" and "The Glazed McGuffin Affair" (see this ep guide) and is available to watch on GameTap. I wasn't sure if the overview field is supposed to be for text or link, so feel free to change if I got it wrong. - Quuux 12:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Our Bewildering Universe! 'Chock Full O Guts' " 
Talk:The Wave (novel)

message: I believe that there are some parts of this article that are not neutral. I will mark it for now, unless somebody objects.
"There are many parallels and they are astonishing." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bonzi77 (talk • contribs) 02:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: Reason for removal: the link to w:he:הנחשול is to a page about the move entitled The Wave (based on the book) however not the book. The correct link would be to w:he:(הגל (ספר which doesn't exist. —MrSomeone ( tlk • cntrb ) 22:04, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing interwiki link to he.wp 

message: There is clearly an error in this tag being placed on this article.  The fact that at the bottom of the page, under the Level 2 headline of Literature, that one of the references sourced is the book of topic in this article clearly on its own is enough to remove this tag, since due to what was already stated, the informations is obviously correct. SnakeChess5 (talk) 17:42, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing Unreferenced Tag 

message: The entire characters section doesn't read like an encyclopedia article, but there is this bit here:
"A weak and shy student, who purks under the shadows of his overachieving brother"
What is this trying to say? 'Purk' is not an actual word in English (I believe it means can in Estonian and Norweigian). It can't mean 'perk', because that doesn't make sense, so what is it trying to say???????????  —Preceding unsigned comment added by BunnyFlying (talk • contribs) 23:43, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters 

message: First: I'm German and thus not a native speaker. But I read this:
>>He eventually shoves her to the ground and this makes him realizes how dangerous The Wave really is.
Shouldn't it be "this makes him realize". By the way, I also think that the text is not written by a native. It seems strange that I can read the text without using a dictionary ;-) --87.172.230.56 (talk) 19:05, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right, 87.172.x, "realizes" was wrong. Thanks for pointing it out :) I corrected the error and made a few changes to hopefully make the article read a bit more natural. keɪɑtɪk flʌfi (talk) 19:40, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar mistake 

message: "Mr. Ross tries to cheer him up by commenting on his tie and suit, and they walk out together to grab a bite to eat."
I just watched the German movie and the ending is drastically different, however I haven't read the book so I won't change it until I have confirmation. 86.25.144.135 (talk) 14:50, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Doesnt a kid get beaten up/abused for being Jewish? I havent read it recently but i would have thought that was relevant, no?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.65.220.216 (talk) 22:35, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-Semitism
Talk:1998–99 California special elections

message: 03:08, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that "special election madness" is not a good term, but as most of the article refers to a specific series of events, rather than the general practice of manipulating special elections, "manipulation" is not a good title either. "Musical chairs" is a common phrase in editorials and articles about both the 1998-99 events in Oakland and similar occurrences elsewhere, so I changed the title, and fixed the double-redirects. Argyriou 06:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Even if everything alleged in this article is true, then the article's language must be changed to present it in a neutral point of view.—Markles 20:17, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done some cleanup of the POV. It's not so easy, because the article is written in a journalistic style which demands adjectives and makes POV rather easy to insert and hard to remove. But I'm way too lazy to rewrite the whole article in a non-journo style. Argyriou 17:10, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: The writing on this page reads more like an informal narration then a reference article. It should be written.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.21.183.34 (talk) 05:28, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing Style 

message: # There is no reference provided to support the contention that "Special election musical chairs" is actually a term used by editorialists.
# The whole article, despite it's many subsections, is about just one example of this phenomenon. Surely there are more examples that could be found?
Snori (talk) 02:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Two problems
Talk:Mendota Bridge

message: I have removed It is often called the "mile-long bridge". (sentence after other rephrasing) as there is no reliable source for this. Lots of bridges are called the Mile Long Bridge or similar, we need a significant reference to include this. --Mirokado (talk) 14:33, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed content 
Wikipedia talk:Reduce confusion by following policy

message: I like it. - brenneman{L}  03:10, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  General comments 

message: I've added an intro one-liner:
:If you follow policy and process, editors know which way is up today and don't feel the ground shifting under their feet.
Is this what the page means, or have I got it badly wrong? - David Gerard 16:28, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, thats it. I think you said it better than I did originally. I really should go through some day and revamp this so that it is more than a rant, it does actually have a point deep down and the new first sentence kind of sets up a way for it to develop. Ansell 03:04, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm working on a Grand Unified Theory of policy versus process. MUWAHAHAHA etc - David Gerard 00:43, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: One-liner

message: The problem is, the ground really *is* shifting under our feet. Making it artificially feel more steady than it really is gives people a false sense of security, and is not exactly conducive to the longetivity of this project. 
Ideally we can be very sensitive to small shifts and react to them in a gentle and timely manner, so that we continue to adapt to our envioronment.
As with all things in real life, failure to adapt is not an option.
Welcome to the real world! :)
Kim Bruning 20:04, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Then we need it to ;-) Hence my lovely process essay! Hammer home the policies: NPOV, NOR, V, AGF, BITE. That last isn't usually on the list, but I suspect it should be. - David Gerard 00:43, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happens if we NEED people to feel the ground shift under their feet?
Talk:IAA (disambiguation)

message: I strongly disagree with the move of the former IAA page to specific disambiguation page (and there was not talk on that move whatsoever) and that the name IAA itself should be occupied bye the mere abbreviation of "Frankfurt Motor Show's" german name. That is a joke, it seems.
There is lot of important terms on this disamiguation, lot of institutions and just the mere substance Indole acetic acid is of high importance in chemistry and biology, each of such terms would outweighed the abbreviation for the show and might deserve IAA page name even more then it. I propose to revers the move: Let's disamiguation is on the IAA  only.
Just have a look on google fight: 
Reo ON  |  +++ 15:02, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frankfurt and disambiguation 

message: This article, which has been at the title IAA for 5 years, was recently moved with no discussion to its current title, and IAA was redirected to a motor show (OK, apparently the largest motor show in the world).  I believe that there is no primary usage for "IAA" and have redirected "IAA" to this dab page, but I request that this dab page be moved back to its original and correct title of "IAA". PamD (talk) 19:11, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Although I listed this at WP:RM as a "potentially controversial" request, an admin has already made the requested move.  Please do not change the name of this page again without further discussion. Thanks. PamD (talk) 07:20, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Actias selene

message: I heard rumors the moth used in the movie was actually Antheraea pernyi which would make more sense. I don't remember tails on the moth... --Kugamazog 03:14, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This illustration on the article isn't Actias selene.It's Argema mimosae!  
XpapilioX (talk) 13:44, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. I've made a note on the talk page for the image, and will remove it from this page. Nadiatalent (talk) 21:31, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustration 

message: I have added info on this (so as not to lose it) as there is a question mark over the notability of the article on the hybrid Graellsia isabellae × Actias selene (see discussion its talk page). Tony Holkham (Talk) 16:00, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hybrid
Talk:Brad Logan

message: This should not be merged with F-Minus. That is a band, this is a person. Also, Brad is one of the most notable people in punk today.
Rik L Rik is not "legendary" in terms of punk rock outside of California specifically Orange County CA. I have changed the article to more accurately portray him as a seminal o.c. artist and feel that this is a better symbolization of his contribution to the early punk scene on the west coast.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.48.20.152 (talk) 07:44, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nergal (Fire Emblem)

message: Is there any way to incorporate the statement made (regarding Kishuna) by Ninian after chapter 23x (22x in Eliwood's tale): "...That was a creature of heresy. Its existence violates nature's most basic laws." Also, does anyone know if she was referring specifically to Magic Seals, or morphs in general? 71.198.181.226 03:18, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: About the morphs

message: I don't think that Ninian and Nills lost their memories of Nergal when passing through the Dragon's Gate. He looks a lot different now than he did before, so they probably just can't recognize him. And Nergal doesn't recognize them because he hasn't seen them since they were children. Though, he's so twisted at this point I don't think he'd care. Dramus 03:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lost Memories?
Talk:Comparison of American and British English/Archive 3

message: As a Brit I've noted in a lot of American TV shows that the way the words bring and take are used is strange. For example in Friends I heard this: "So just bring it back downstairs". I'd expect this to be "So just take it back downstairs". I can't think of any other examples right now but can anyone comment on this? Is "bring it back" correct in American English? Thanks for any info!
:...hmmm... I guess it's not a matter of British vs. American here, but rather of personal usage and idiolects. In this scenario, the meat & potatoes is what you listener (as opposed to the speaker) think is the center or focus of the action, rather than movement toward or away from a location. Check this out. Of course, if I was a grammarian, I woulda told you "that usage is WRONG!!!!". But I love lexicography too much to be such a beast. Best, --JackLumber 13:05, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bring/Take in American English?
Talk:Tony Atwater

message: This is clearly an attack page. This is a real person, so not a candidate for AFD, however, the page carries no biographical information, or other details concerning this person –only statements that are clearly one person’s point of view. Brimba 03:30, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This comment is no longer true. --DThomsen8 (talk) 11:34, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Five-Company Agreement

message: I'm slowly translating the Japanese article. (I need the practice, really.) My choice of the name "Five-Company Agreement" was entirely arbitrary, as I'm not aware of any accepted English name for it; either there isn't one, or my Google-fu is weak.  –Aponar Kestrel (talk) 03:33, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translating 

message: Yes, I'm disputing text I put on the page. This amuses me, but I'm pretty sure it's the right thing to do anyway.
The Gosha Kyoutei is fairly obscure; I have no independent verification, and the text of the original Japanese wiki article is setting off POV warning bells in my head. It's not closely bound to other articles, either: it seems to be off in its own little corner of the web of links. Still, this could be a false alarm, so I haven't added this article to the appropriate categories yet; I'll know for sure once I finish reading it. ^_^; Hopefully by then I'll have some decent references: I'm having trouble finding any sites that talk about, e.g., Shimizu what's-his-name or Pacific Ocean Television other than jp:Wikipedia. This "Ask Goo!" article  looks relevant, though.
What time is it, anyway? ... oh.  –Aponar Kestrel (talk) 10:16, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute