Talk:Forest management

message: There is little here about the value of forest land as property.   Land management needs more material. Despite its ecological value, it also has economic value.  Not all land is public land which the article seems to assume. --71.245.164.83 (talk) 04:38, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forest as property 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:27, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: A discussion has been started on whether sustainable forest management should be merged to here? The discussion is at the talk page of WikiProject Climate Change. I am not sure what to think of that proposal. For now, I have added an excerpt under "types". The question is: what are other types of forest management that are "not sustainable"? Probably every type of forest management will want to be sustainable? Pinging User:InformationToKnowledge. EMsmile (talk) 09:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: this merger has now been carried out. EMsmile (talk) 11:26, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should [[sustainable forest management]] be merged to here? 

message: What subsections are missing?To answer this question, it may be helpful to gather URLs to sources around the Web on forest management. I've started a structured list, below. Feel free to add resources and potential headings to it. By skimming the URL sources, we can ascertain how the subject breaks down...    — The Transhumanist    20:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for starting this. Do you have time and energy to work on this article? Would be great! Regarding your listing, I've converted it to possible main level headings like this:
* Definition and terminology
* Objectives
* Planning
* Methods and practices
* Research areas
* Role in climate change mitigation
* Policies and laws
* Stakeholders and actors (this is where the info on NGOs would go)
* By region and country
I don't know what you had in mind with "Joint forest management" - should that be under "policies and laws" maybe?
Compare to the current structure which is like this:
* Definition
* Wildlife considerations --> move to where in the new structure?
* Management intensity --> move to "Methods and practices" in the new structure?
* Public input and awareness --> move to "Stakeholders and actors" in the new structure?
* Sustainable forest management --> move to "Methods and practices" in the new structure?
* Problems --> this is a new section that we do need
* Mitigation of deforestation and climate change --> is already in "Role in climate change mitigation" in the new structure (although what about the "mitigation of deforestation" part?) EMsmile (talk) 07:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Building the heading tree 

message: We currently have 31 excerpts. I think this is far too many and does not make for comfortable reading. I do like excerpts (in principle) but 31 excerpts in one article is too many. There has to be a better solution for this. In some cases, it could rather be a list of bullet points with wikilinks. EMsmile (talk) 12:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Far too many excerpts