lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Streoneshalh

message: I'm putting some suggestions here that I hope will make this article more likely to be acceptable. I think there is good information here and it should probably be kept, but the corrent format is letting the article down.
#The article needs to be given context. The average reader will not know what the word means, so it should be explained before starting on an explanation of its origin.
#We need to be sure that this article reflects the current mainstream thinking about the word, not a new or minority opinion.
#Question and answer (Who was Streona?) is probably not appropriate for an encyclopedia.
#Instead of giving a detailed historical context, only give absolutely necessary background and a separate article created with information about e.g. Viking invasions, with a link to it. It may be that this information already exists in another article. This article should focus very tightly on the word being discussed.
#More links would really improve the article.
Thanks, and happy editing. DJ Clayworth 20:13, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

message: I'm pulling out my red pen because the promised cleanup has never materialized after this article survived AfD.  This will probably bust it back to a stub, but at least there will be a solid foundation to start from.  I'm removing all of the original research.--Isotope23 19:38, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits

message: At some stage there will need to be consideration of the relationship with the Whitby Abbey article.--Henrygb 10:24, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Whitby Abbey
Category talk:Luna programme

message: I was wondering why failed missions, such as:
* Luna 1958A
* Luna 1958B
* Luna 1958C
* Sputnik 25
And other missions which have articles are not included in this category?
Some of the missions that are in this section partially failed but are still included. Are these omissions deliberate or just a mistake? Would anyone object to these being added to the category? Jackqu7 20:25, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Islamic holidays

message: add to this as you wish, but please don't remove without a reason! --Irishpunktom\talk 20:41, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Why are the two most important days (i.e. the 'Eid) stuffed at the end of this template? They should be the firtst two, in my opinion, as all Muslims celebrate these; the others are not as universal. MartijnL 17:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I am separating the two eids because they are the most important and universal Muslim festivals. LeviShel (talk) 04:40, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Elmstone Hardwicke

message: Material to add:
<LI>Stats
<LI>Map(s)
<LI>History of the parish of Elmstone-Hardwicke
<LI>Info on the church, impressive for a village of this size
<LI>No pubs or shops (unless the Old Spot is officially in E-H?)
<LI>The old school, now a Slavic church - children attend mostly Tredington Primary School and Cleeve Comprehensive ('Cleeve School')
<LI>Notable local farms & farming families
<LI>the Furzens; Dog Bark Lane; River Swilgate; Smithy's scrapyard; the conker tree by Westerns
<LI>The M5 motorway passes through the village and split some farms in half. Kilbys had a bridge built just for their cattle and tractors by the Ministry, the public road through Colmans Farm is now a dead end.
<LI>The extent of the parish(quite large in terms of area) - Elmstone-Hardwicke church area, the hamlet of Hardwicke (with the tiny village green), through to the travellers site near the A38.
<LI>Naming confusion - before postcode databases we would regularly receive mail marked 'Hardwicke' (Stroud)
<LI>Pleasant rural area but somewhat the rubbish dump of Glos. too - flytipping, crematorium, motorway, rubbish dumps, Cursey Lane 
-- kingboyk 22nd/23rd September 2005
* Also, historical links with Deerhurst and Deerhust Priory. --kingboyk 18:54, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Adam Boland

message: The article says this breakfast show screens from Sunday to Monday each week. Is that seven days a week, or two days a week  (Sunday and the following day? ):-.  Moriori 21:00, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I see it has been changed to Sunday to Friday. Cheers. Moriori 20:26, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Two days a week?

message: Copyright Violation - Alot of text is stolen off a copyrighted page. It must be removed and rewritten ASAP. Mike Beckham 21:17, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be clean now. Thanks Michael, Sarah Ewart (Talk) 13:14, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Complete Rewrite
Talk:Bishop's Cleeve

message: No entry for Cleeve School?
It would also be nice to have a mention of Oldacres, whose building used to dominate the centre of the village (where Tesco now stands). They also owned the haulier Santa Fe Express, of nearby Stoke Orchard.
:We just got a link to a Cleeve article in the Portugese wikipedia. Amazing. --kingboyk 23:40, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Avedon Carol

message: Carol was born in the Maryland but now resides in London. She also runs a political blog at http://sideshow.me.uk/.
This happens to Avedon a lot (I've seen it).
Her first name is Avedon.
Her last name is Carol.
I assume the sentence should read ... Avedon was born in...
unless for some reason the intent was to use her last name here, which would seem rather odd to me.
Looking at it again I think that in "born in the Maryland" there is an unintended "the" in the sentence. Perhaps it should read...
"Avedon was born in Maryland but now resides in London"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.172.115.2 (talk • contribs) 
:Wikipedia articles refer to people by their last name as standard. Vashti 19:47, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First / last names 

message: I'm not sure these links easily fit into the article, but I list them here in order to help establish notability:
*http://www.newstatesman.com/uk-politics/2008/10/extreme-porn-violence-women
*http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3525576.stm
*http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/6334167.stm
Mdwh (talk) 20:27, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd party references
Talk:Diggers

message: Anyone want to mention the new Diggers? Information:
* http://diggers2012.wordpress.com/
* http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2012/08/499235.html
* http://ecobrooklyn.com/diggers-2012-making-waste-land/
* http://theoccupiedtimes.co.uk/?p=5492
* http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/latenightlive/diggers-2012/4282262
41.204.74.44 (talk) 12:49, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diggers 2012 

message: Is there any chance someone could work in that the Diggers would not have called St. George's Hill by that name? They did not recognize saints and therefore called it simply "George Hill."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.12.120.61 (talk) 23:22, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  St. George's Hill 

message: "Digger movement" might be a better title for this article, given its usage in sources. (not watching, please ) czar 07:50, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Know Nothing

message: How can the KNs be referred to as center-left? Perhaps consider removing the political position entirely since they don't fall into a category we would understand in modern times. 142.255.72.79 (talk) 04:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: They shouldn't be. Per prior discussions on this page modern left–right alignment of political positions doesn't map to U.S. politics of the 1850s/1860s. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 15:33, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Center-left? 

message: A debate on this topic was previously held in 2006, but I think it lacked rigor and disagree with its conclusion. I propose this article should be renamed American Party (1850s), consistent with conventions on naming for political parties. "Know Nothing" was an epithet used by the party's opponents and is a reference not to the party itself but to the secret organizations which organized wing. (To the extent the party/movement had a nickname for itself, it was "SAM.") It is a step or two removed (in that the name was more common and less vulgar) from articles titled "Demonrats" or "Rethuglicans" for those modern parties. The section on Legacy even recognizes this but fails to note the term was a "provocative slur" from the start. This misuse has also bled over into other articles on elections that the (Native) American Party participated in and has become an issue throughout Wikipedia.
Implication was made in the 2006 debate that "Know Nothing" refers to a broader political movement than the Party, which would potentially make it an appropriate name for an article even if an epithet, but this article is explicitly about the party itself. (I also question whether such an article could even clearly be delineated from Nativism in United States politics; more likely it would be a subsection of that article. The postscript to the 2006 debate notes that this article was then poorly written, and I think it has made major improvements since then—the title is a remnant of a simpler time. -A-M-B-1996- (talk) 17:26, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: the reliable sources overwhelmingly prefer "Know Nothing" (see the bibliography) and their position is what Wikipedia reports. Rjensen (talk) 18:06, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Agree with Rjensen's point. The academic and popular literature overwhelmingly use "Know Nothing" for the party, so we follow the sources. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 20:00, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming to American Party (1850s)
Talk:Scientist (musician)

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hopeton Brown. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:25, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hopeton Brown" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: It would be nice to mention in article that Scientists' tracks from the album "Scientist Rids the World of the Evil Curse of the Vampires" have been used in GTA 3 soundtrack - namely, on KJAH in-game radio station broadcast.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.208.255.191 (talk) 06:22, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grand Theft Auto 3 Soundtrack
Talk:Goblinoid

message: Are you sure that Orcs and Goblins are the same in Middle Earth? In the movies, goblins seem smaller then the orcs, and have a different tone of voice.
:They're different names for the same thing - see Orc (Middle-earth)#Orcs and goblins. Uruk-hai however were a new breed of orc. ··gracefool |☺ 00:04, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: "Orc" is their name in Elvish and "Goblin" is their name in the Common Tongue.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.51.162.177 (talk) 21:41, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm not convinced that the point merits a whole paragraph in this article, though. Say it once concisely, with a link to Orc (Middle-earth). —Tamfang (talk) 05:48, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Orcs vs. Goblins

message: I don't see an issue with notability or in-universe language here and have removed these two templates. If you wish to re-add either or both please give a rationale on the talk page when you do so. Sc00baSteve (talk) 00:08, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Templates

message: The link for the word "Gretchin", which is contained in this page, redirects to this page itself! I'd rather suggest writing an article about "Gretchin", which is the Warhammer 40.000 version of Goblinoids.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.203.12.69 (talk) 20:12, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That happens sometimes. I've fixed the loopn redirect but instead of a standalone article on Gretchin we should better deal with those in the Warhammer article first. De728631 (talk) 23:12, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circular reference
Talk:Richard Rose/Archive 1

message: In regard to this edit comment, there's nothing wrong with red links. When the article is written, the link will be created automatically. Please avoid external links with the body of the artivcle. They belong in the External links section. Specifically, the phrase "their works are available at the TAT forum" smacks of promotion or advertising and is frowned upon. --goethean ॐ 17:11, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Got it.  Thanks for your help. Steve Harnish 03:46, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  red links
Talk:Lucille Fletcher

message: As I wrote this, I used IMDB as a source, but I'm not sure she wrote The Hitch-Hiker (1953 film).  This could be a mistake at IMDB. Steve-O 21:46, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The article currently has the following text:
As Fletcher once explained in an interview, Sorry, Wrong Number was partially inspired by an incident from someone else's life.  While Herrmann was sick at home, Fletcher went down to the corner drug store for medicine. Innocently striking up a conversation with her pharmacist, a longtime friend, she raised the ire of an elderly woman who had apparently been waiting first.  The woman interrupted and approached the druggist, complaining about poor service and demanding to "know who this interloper is?!", referring to Fletcher. Finding the woman's shrill voice and demeanor particularly irritating, Fletcher went home with the intention of writing a script based around a character with those traits who becomes embroiled in a precarious situation.
This has gone uncited for over a year. I have found a source for a similar but not identical version of the story. I am going to replace the above with a cited version, but I am preserving the text here in case anyone later finds a source for this version. DES (talk) 22:05, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of "Sorry. Wrong Number" 
Talk:DPLL

message: ----
May or may not describe the same algorithm as Davis-Logemann-Loveland algorithm.  If so, look to merge the two, while preserving all important information. - McCart42 (talk) 21:56, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is (or should be the same). The description at Davis-Logemann-Loveland algorithm has some quirks, but basically describes the DPLL algorithm. A merger is reasonable. But what name? I choose DPLL as the currently most used term ("DPLL method" or "DPLL algorithm" are alternatives). DLL is technically correct, but rarely used. I've never seen the long form Davis-Logemann-Loveland algorithm before. Davis-Putnam method is frequently used, but wrong. I vote for "DPLL" (well, I chose it ;-) or "DPLL algorithm". Other voices? --Stephan Schulz 22:13, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

text: I approve of the merged version on your userpage.  Feel free to change it at the proper location unless anyone disagrees. - McCart42 (talk) 12:43, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I like it as well (except for the original problems on the D-L-L page - I'll go over it when I have time). I suggest DPLL method or DPLL algorithm as the final name. It avoids the ambiguity with the Digital Phase Lock Loop, and I think it is a much more likely term to search for than the 3-long-names version. Wikipedia policy is to use the best-known term. At least from my reading that would either be the incorrect "Davis-Putnam algorithm/method" or one of the two I suggested. --Stephan Schulz 22:06, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Alper

message: With all due respect, my name is Alper (I'm Turkish, too)) and i realized that a mistake has been done in the meaning of the compound word. The correct meaning is as follows:
Alp=brave or hero
er=soldier (rank of private in today's modern Turkish) In certain contexts "er" also mean "male" person.
Sincerely yours.
Alper ÇOPUR
Ok, I'll change the article content to reflect this. I should have realized this, but my Turkish is not what it should be. Illustir 22:03, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:TQ (singer)

message: He is listed under 'Other notable individuals banned or refused entry' under the page 'List of individuals banned from entering the United Kingdom'. Should this not be included? --Scythre (talk) 12:13, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely it should be included. --RyanTee82 (talk) 04:38, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: if you can reference it, then fine. if you can't, it'll be removed! TQfan (talk) 01:57, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Banned from UK

message: So annoyed with whoever ruined this page. It was much better written in previous versions. It is painful to read. I will get around to fixing this at some point. Please do not do anymore damage!! TQfan (talk) 02:00, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disappointed! 

message: Hi I've tried to add a song to TQ(singers) page but when I put save it comes at in films his been in why is this?thanks MavrickWilson MavrickWilson (talk) 19:57, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing
Talk:Gnat

message: Heard that gnats lay eggs in fruit.  Add that to the article or I will poo on you.
--69.151.57.3 (talk) 22:51, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gnat eggs 

message: A gnat /ˈnæt/ is any of many species of tiny flying insects in the Dipterid suborder Nematocera, especially those in the families Mycetophilidae, Anisopodidae and Sciaridae.
In British English, the term applies particularly to Nematocerans of the family Culicidae (mosquitoes). The common gnat is the species Culex pipiens.[1]
Male gnats often assemble in large mating swarms or ghosts, particularly at dusk.[2]
Gnat larvae are mostly free-living and some are aquatic. Many feed on plants, though some are carnivorous. Larval plant feeders (such as the Hessian fly larva) cause root, stem, or leaf galls to be formed by the host plant. Some species of fungus gnats (families Mycetophilidae and Sciaridae) are pests of mushrooms and roots of potted plants in homes and greenhouses.
Some South American Pleurothallid orchids are pollinated by tiny gnats and have correspondingly small flowers
:I have never heard a mosquito referred to as a gnat in American English.  That citation, http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/gnat, is a mess that says gnats resemble mosquitoes before going on to say they are mosquitoes.  It's been removed. WerewNC (talk) 14:08, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparent contradiction 

message: I Can't understand how the colony can stay in the same place, while the individual gnat is flying madly around. I wonder what kind of motion  guidance system they have individually.WFPM (talk) 20:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Individual guidance system

message: I've spent most of the morning on the web trying to determine if there really is "hair on a gnat's ass" and if so just how big it is.  I can't find a suitable picture anywhere.  would be really nice to find such info here.  (electron microscopy anyone?)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.105.118.42 (talk) 15:08, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures and specific features

message: "The common gnat is the species Culex pipiens". I believe this article is basically quite mistaken. I believe what are generally called gnats are not mosquitoes but are smaller and do not bite. Gnats also tend to swarm at dusk forming clouds while mosquitoes do not. Culex pipiens is the common mosquito and not a gnat. Mosquito and gnat are different things.  GS3 (talk) 16:31, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have never heard a mosquito referred to as a gnat in American English.  That citation, http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/gnat, is a mess that says gnats resemble mosquitoes before going on to say they are mosquitoes.  It's been removed. WerewNC (talk) 14:08, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gnats are not mosquitoes 

message: Are gnats quantum entangled in flight; their close flight in a swarm in up down and sideways directions indicates deep connectivity. -Usergnome  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usergnome (talk • contribs) 22:52, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quanta
Talk:Louie Dog

message: Does anybody else think that the last bit of the article is a bit mean? It's a lovely closing paragraph, the symbol of unity between two friends, and then some smartass has ruined it by being all sarcastic and stating the obvious! I'm sure it wasn't put there with bad intentions, but it is a bit annoying to spoil the article like that. Dragonfly888 22:32, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Harsh!

message: Anyone know if Lou dog was deaf? I've heard it is common among dalmations. And considering he would be on stage during concerts, that must have ruined his hearing, no? I thought but don't know for sure that such loud noise is really bad for dogs. Peoplesunionpro 16:47, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deaf?
Talk:Kelli White

message: What are her particular sports, and when will her ban expire?  162.84.72.171 22:39, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: She's a sprinter, and she received a two-year ban. She was tested positive in the 2003 World Championships, but when the ban started, I don't know. - Kvaks 03:32, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added the LP and Bio templates after spending some time on the article.  I think that it needs the following:
* an infobox
* a photo
* more info about her early life, coaches, high school and college careers
* info about her testimony in the BALCO cases
* what she's doing since announcing her retirement
--Hjal 08:47, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography 
Talk:Imperial Court in Kyoto

message: Doesn't the article Kyoto Gosho basically mention what is already written in this article? All the information that is here could be added/merged with there I think... anyone who disagrees please by all means say so. Gryffindor 22:43, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The difference is this article is about the political entity while the article you mentioned is about a building. Or this is how the two articles should develop. -- Taku 22:57, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

text: I agree with Taku that the articles should remain separate. Kyoto Gosho should give the history of the palace (when & where established, burned, moved, war, architecture, landscape). Imperial Court in Kyoto should discuss the people, ranks, titles, ceremonies, intrigues etc. Fg2 10:14, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

text: I also agree with Taku. In my opinion it is rather a case of expanding the article on the Imperial Court (People, organisation, history). Chingon86 02:50, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

text: I also agree with Taku. There is a difference between a court and a palace: The Kyoto Gosho still stands, as of today, and the court is gone. How comes? Well, looks like the people are missing. -- Mkill 18:42, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Martin Puryear

message: Both Sanctuary and Box and Pole are stub articles (and are both orphaned), and I think they would be better to be merged into this article. Hertzsprung (talk) 21:46, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: (This appears to have been done).  Reify-tech (talk) 18:42, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge
Talk:Rivka Golani

message: I've just reverted a copyright violation for a second time, this time from .
Please, people, it's not that hard to contribute original writing. Refactoring only the first few paragraphs isn't good enough --Duk 22:58, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]