Talk:3D tic-tac-toe

message: At least a third of the article 3-D Tic-Tac-Toe (Atari console game) (article formerly called 3-D Tic-Tac-Toe, while this one was called Qubic replicates this article. The rest is about a program for the Atari 2600. Does that program for a long-obsolete console really deserve its own article? It's not as if its existence is particularly notable - there have been many Qubic programs before and since. Jeh (talk) 02:35, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That would make sense to me. The article about the Atari game could be moved to something like "3-D Tic-Tac-Toe (Atari console game)", thus making room to move this to "3-D Tic-Tac-Toe". Most of the implementation-specific content from the former could then be moved here and that heading would remain as a redirect, as would Qubic. Within this article "Qubic" would be a subhead describing the Parker Brothers product, sort of parallel with the mention of the 3M "Paper Games" sheets. I'm ready to be WP:BOLD on this if there are no objections. (And thank you for the response!)  Jeh (talk) 02:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

text: Well, I've done most of what I can. I can't move Qubic to 3-D Tic-Tac-Toe because the latter title is now the name of a redirect to the article on the Atari game, and the redirect has an edit history. So I requested that that conflicting redirect be deleted. We'll see if that is accepted as a "to make room for an uncontroversial move". Cheers! Jeh (talk) 05:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Update: Move of the talk page is still pending. Jeh (talk) 21:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Annnnd the fundamentals of the move are now complete. Jeh (talk) 03:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 

message: It gets worse.  I was concerned that Qubic might need disambiguation, and looked it up on Google.  Sure enough, there is currently an app named Qubic available on Amazon, which I have just installed on my Kindle Fire.  It is a puzzle game having nothing to do with tic-tac-toe.  Moreover, there are other items and businesses that use the name.  So I'm thinking the Qubic entry should be disambiguation. kogorman (talk) 16:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if the other things are notable enough to have articles, sure. But either way (redirect or disambig) this article should first be moved (renamed) to 3-D Tic-Tac-Toe and that can't happen until an admin deletes the redirect page that's currently there. Jeh (talk) 18:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

text: Hey, nice batch of improvements! Thank you! Nice to see another 3DTTT enthusiast. And from Cal Poly Pomona no less (I went there; I had Louden's program running on the RSTS/E system, way back when). Jeh (talk) 18:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other "Qubics" 

message: I just made a version of this game that allows for physically playing against algorithms on an electronic board.
You can see it here: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/xno/4play
I was wondering if I could mention this addition somewhere in the article, since I do think it represents a new type of play that hasn’t been possible before.  However, I understand if this just seems like advertising.  Any advice/direction would be appreciated. 5^.5*.5+.5=phi (talk) 17:45, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding my version to the page