lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cape Cod Central Railroad

message: I have just updated the page so it states that Mass Coastal Railroad is the freight railroad the transports trash off of the Cape. I know feeder service from Middle Borough is in the works and Cape Cod Central it's sister company will be providing this service. Note Cape Cod Central ran the first train to Middle Borough last fall as a special for the first time in over 13 years.
Ryan 23:32, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I wanted to added the coords to remove this page from 'missing massachusetts coordinates' on the Mass Portal page, but linear features (like railroads) aren't so simply defined.  I decided to use the example suggested in the geography portal page of Severn Tunnel.  By adding the station coords to a table, and using the West Barnstable station as a 'mid point', I had a proxy for the geocoord for the site.  I was disappointed that I could not add the links to the station articles on the table without messing up the text; I also could not add the coords in ddd mm ss format (again table formatting), and so just use those respective pages' coords in the table, even though my coords from Google are ridiculously close to them.  Despite my frustration with formatting, I think I added some worthwhile content.  By all means please clean up what I hope is mere minutae, that I left behind, and reply here if you're concerned about either my methods or my madness. Bill McKenna (talk) 17:18, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Geographic Coords
Talk:First Republic of Venezuela

message: This is not an entity separate from Venezuela with which it can be confused; it is just one of the historical republics of Venezuela, and so the parantheses-style disambiguation is inappropriate.  See French Fifth Republic etc.--Pharos 03:04, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is about an historical state in Venezuela, which needs to be disambiguated from the current republic. It is not an integral part of a serialized account of the history of Venezuela, which the case with articles like Fifth Republic of South Korea or French Fifth Republic. See Roman Republic (18th century), etc. -- Domino theory 18:14, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, Pharos is correct. Venezuelan historiography does "serialize" it's history (to uses Domino theory's words), and the current state of Venezuela recognizes its origins in the 1811 state, much like the United States sees its origins in the United States (first federation).TriniMuñoz (talk) 04:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for move

message: The term "United States of Venezuela" was used for the First Republic of Venezuela and the Second Republic of Venezuela, but it is not mentioned at History of Venezuela. So where (if anywhere) should the redirect  be targeted? Please contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 October 26#United States of Venezuela. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 10:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  United States of Venezuela
Talk:Second Republic of Venezuela

message: This is not an entity separate from Venezuela with which it can be confused; it is just one of the historical republics of Venezuela, and so the parantheses-style disambiguation is inappropriate.  See French Fifth Republic etc.--Pharos 03:05, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is about an historical state in Venezuela, which needs to be disambiguated from the current republic. It is not an integral part of a serialized account of the history of Venezuela, which the case with articles like Fifth Republic of South Korea or French Fifth Republic. See Roman Republic (18th century), etc. -- Domino theory 18:14, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, Pharos is correct. Venezuelan historiography does "serialize" it's history (to use Domino theory's words), and the current state of Venezuela recognizes its origins in the 1811 state, and Bolívar claimed to be restoring the Venezuelan republic, not creating a new one. Historians later applied the term "second." The above analogy between the ancient Roman Republic and the 18th-century one is wrong. In the Venezuelan case, the governments fell and were reestablished because they were in the throes of a war of independence, with stability only arriving after 1830; in the Roman case they are separated by gulf of millennia and vastly different cultural concepts of statehood! TriniMuñoz (talk) 03:44, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for move

message: The term "United States of Venezuela" was used for the First Republic of Venezuela and the Second Republic of Venezuela, but it is not mentioned at History of Venezuela. So where (if anywhere) should the redirect  be targeted? Please contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 October 26#United States of Venezuela. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 10:50, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  United States of Venezuela
Talk:Staples Business Advantage

message: This information is not correct - Staples Advantage was around long before the Corporate Express acquisition.  It is a division within Staples specific to business-to-business functions.  The website was called StaplesLink from 1999 to 2011 when it was renamed StaplesAdvantage.com.  The Corporate Express business was integrated into the existing StaplesAdvantage business unit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.37.244.10 (talk) 19:46, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Dead Poetic

message: Can someone please scale the image down for me? You'll know which one. thanks. --Playjex 18:48, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please? 

message: I removed this tag for a variety of reasons. First off, the genres given now seem to fit them well enough. There is no reason to add genres with the slightest semblance. Second, I am not sure whoever added it knows much about the genre. It is a word thrown around often, yet it has no real page (only a link to emo). Anyone familiar with the actual history of emo should recognize that Dead Poetic is not. DP more resembles rock/post-hardcore than anything, and these tags are already present. Please post here before adding other genres. Thank you.
:Definately AGREED! haha. --Playjex (talk) 15:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emocore 

message: This is awesome news and will be cherrished! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Homie C (talk • contribs) 04:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "DEAD POETIC IS NOT DEAD!" 

message: This isn't hardcore. However, I realize that the band is Christian so I instead changed the genre to Christian Rock. FatalError (talk) 23:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hence the "post" part of it, as in AFTER hardcore.--Velvet elvis81 (talk) 07:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian Hardcore? 

message: They've been listed as Christian hard rock for some time now w/o controversy. Anyone who wants to change this needs to come to the talk page and discuss it so we can come to a consensus. "I'm friends with one of the guys in the band" is not a valid Wikipedia argument--it's just unverifiable name dropping. Maybe it's true: if so, you want a prize or something? Maybe it's not: I know Mel Gibson and I play cards with Jay Leno and George W. Bush is my prayer buddy.--Velvet elvis81 (talk) 07:00, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian hard rock
Talk:Supernova (DC Comics)

message: A fun thread to discuss the possible identity of the character.  I believe that Devem, leader of the Superboy cult will be revealed as Supernova.  This would reflect past behaviors of the character in his pre-crisis incarnations.  -sharp962
Maybe...I'm hoping this will be a way for DC to bring back Kon-El, After all Nova was an alias Superman used.-Wakefencer
Maybe he is a future version of Booster Gold... a Booster Gold that went on to mature and obtained even more artifacts.  I dunno if that goes against the DC rules of time travel or not.  It is more like the Back to the Future rules of time travel, but it would be way cool if Supernova is actually him.
I say evidence is strong for Supernova being one of the Superman robots with a Phantom Zone projector built into his chest.  Both are technologies readily available to Superman, who uses "we" a lot in refering to Supernova.  A counter-argument against this theory asks why Superman wouldn't just use the robot just as Superman, instead of dressing him up.  My speculation is that if Supes didn't know whether his powers would return, he'd rather not generate false hope.  *shrugs* --El benito 17:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Supernova (comics) article."  It's not a discussion thread to air your opinions about what might or might not happen in a future comic book storyline. 12.22.250.4 20:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah!  What's the matter with you guys?  Supernova is obviously the Eradicator.  --Exvicious 18:40, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Who is Supernova???

message: Where are you getting the information that he has chronokinesis?--Wakefencer 02:53, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's really not a place for  speculation of any kind. We should discuss ways to improve the article. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 04:01, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Powers

message: Similiar to what happened with Ronin, I've recreated the page now that more than one person has used the Supernova identity. --DrBat 01:08, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recreating the page 

message: Is it me or does Supernova's logo look suspiciously like the Starbrand?
Matthewbrownny (talk) 19:20, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo

message: This article needs a complete re-write, it fails to treat this character as an object of the narrative. I will have a go later --Allemandtando (talk) 10:21, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs a complete rewrite
Talk:Middletown, Delaware

message: I deleted this: However, the decrease in social drinking has been offset by an increased presence of local and state politicians - so caution is still advised when bringing women and small children to the event. It's funny, I'll admit. But it doesn't belong here. Stlom 03:15, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Regarding your 12:03, August 1, 2007, edit and comment ("wikipedia is not a directory"):  I didn't create the list of fast-food joints—someone else apparently thinks their presence is noteworthy—I merely added the proper links.  Your smugness was as unnecessary as your axe. @grog_beta 01:35, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My edit summary was not intended to be smug, it is merely the name of a Wikipedia policy.  VerruckteDan 04:18, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please accept my apologies sir. @grog_beta 17:37, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No offense taken.  VerruckteDan 18:21, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  to VerruckteDan 

message: None of the private schools in the area are actually in town. Also, the St. George's vo-tech school isn't anywhere near Middletown; I don't know why it even has a Middletown address, but it's nearly to St. Georges. Mangoe (talk) 22:05, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's in town 
Talk:United States at the Summer Olympics

message: Ok, so, you would think that the IOC and the USOC should agree as to how many medals the United States won at each Games.  You'd be wrong... The USOC table is at , the IOC numbers can be found by going to  and clicking on the "medals by country" link on the right-hand side. They're not the same, for every year through 1912.
I've changed the table back to reflect IOC numbers.
My big question is, however, for 1896, who exactly is the USOC snubbing, James Connolly or Frank Lane? -- Jonel | Speak 03:16, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Medals
Talk:Fairmount Line

message: :as a hybird of the Red Line and the purple of the Commuter Rail.
A saw an explanation elsewhere that indigo was chosen as a hybrid of blue and purple.  Personally, I think it's used because it's purple by a different name.  Any reliable sources? -- Beland 04:27, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Color

message: Why is the Indigo Line not proposing to build a separate rapid transit line, perhaps extending the red line, in much the way there's a proposal to extend the Green Line to Somerville/Medford along the existing commuter rail right of way?  Is the Fairmount right of way too narrow to have three tracks (to keep one track available for commuter rail in addition to two tracks for a rapid transit system)?  JNW2 00:25, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why not rapid transit?

message: The line map currently shows the NEC and Providence/Stoughton line branching off to the left and down just above Readville.  I believe that if the Franklin line is going to be at the bottom of the map, the tracks to Providence branch off to the right and down, and the NEC tracks to South Station via Hyde Park, Back Bay, etc branch off up and to the left at Readville.  The Readville station is right by where all the tracks come together for these splits; I don't know the station well enough to comment on whether having Readville station on the Franklin branch is correct.  JNW2 09:22, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Line Map

message: The article currently says "Most trains reverse direction at the south end at Readville, but a few continue onto the Franklin Line or Providence/Stoughton Line."  While I don't doubt that the tracks will support trains continuing to either Franklin or Providence/Stoughton, I cannot find anything in the current MBTA timetables suggesting that there are any trains that stop both stations on the Fairmount line and stations on the Providence/Stoughton line.  Train 901 departs from South Station, and its only stops are Canton Center and Stoughton; that appears to be the only Providence/Stoughton train that does not stop at Back Bay.  Maybe train 901 makes this statement in the wikipedia article true (though it's not at all clear to me which route 901 takes from South Station to Readville), but unless I'm missing something in the MBTA timetables, I think this part of the article ought to be rewritten to be clearer.  JNW2 09:37, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Providence/Stroughton connection/schedule

message: If the article is going to mention a lack of night and weekend service, it ought to comment on whether bus service is available during those times in the general areas near the stations on the Fairmount line.  I suspect it may be, unlike most parts of the MBTA Commuter Rail system which covers areas that often have no bus service at all.  JNW2 09:41, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Night and Weekend Service
Talk:Baruch ben Neriah

message: Rollston et. al do not discuss the 1975 bulla at all, and Goren says it has not been lab tested, though he did imply that it could be questioned on the same paleographic grounds as the 1996 bulla. Perhaps, "Some commentators have questioned the authenticity of both bullae" is not precisely warranted by the cited references. —Hanina
This paper https://www.academia.edu/10134823/The_Authenticity_of_the_Bullae_of_Berekhyahu_Son_of_Neriyahu_the_Scribe appears to conclude that the bullae are forgeries:  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.54.247.158 (talk) 07:26, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Historicity
Talk:Boston and Providence Railroad

message: Much of the information for the stations and service at the southern end of the line, towards Providence is not up-to-date.
Table needs updating. Dogru144 18:24, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Table obsolescence

message: I'm all for it.  The two are two different ideas. shuffdog 04:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Splitting out the MBTA line article

message: The New Bedford/Fall River Line feeds off the Stoughton Line, so why don't we merge them?  Brokenwit 06:07, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Bedford/Fall River Line Merge? 

message: Your map of eastern Massachusetts, showing at least the early version of this railroad, is where, Keem-O-Sabe? --Jim Luedke Jimlue (talk) 21:13, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: At sea

message: I'm very pleased you show a map of (well, almost) the RR's original route, from Boston to Providence.  But:
- Provide a caption.  Tell us what years the route as shown existed.
- At both the Boston & Providence ends, you show two termini.  Well, one of each wasn't there originally, in 1835.  Color the forks which were added later differently from the rest of the line, and add a legend therefor.
-  And for God's sake, label the road's stations on the map.  The reader can't make head or tail geographically out of an (otherwise excellent) abstract table of stations.
Yours for an America in which we ... er, rail more.
Jimlue (talk) 17:52, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Map needs improvement
Talk:Mary of Jesus of Ágreda

message: Does Maria de Agreda say anywhere that Christians should deviate from clearly defined Biblical principles of charity and forgiveness and  persecute Jews because they crucified the Lord? Something should be made clear here--"revenging the Crucifixion" is NOT a Christian principle and is a sin just as revenge is in any other case. "Vengence is mine; I will repay," is what God said. As for Maria being anti-Semitic, is she stating facts that occured with accuracy and without demanding vengence on the Jews, or is she inaccurate and demanding vengence on the Jews? Also, vigilantes are a different story, as they distort the truth in their own minds to justify their actions, so this needs to be distinguished. JBogdan 23:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Anti-Semitism?

message: The German Wikipedia article says that María de Agreda is "venerable", but not yet beatified. It might be good to see if a date can be found for the beatification (the linked article says she has been beatified, but it's not exactly a peer-reviewed, unimpeachable source...) I'd be happier seeing a second source here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.13.16.18 (talk) 11:01, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference from German Article 

message: The María de Agreda article sould be moved/renamed to Maria de Jesus de Ágreda (that is more correct and is the name with she is recognized by the Church and by the people). Thanks. 84.90.92.195 (talk) 15:43, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Page rename

message: I wonder whether it is in the line of Wikipedia principles to spuriously refer to Casanova, a victim of the dubious Venetian inquisition and denunciation system, as "a renowned criminal"... --Terminally uncool (talk) 11:06, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renowned Criminal? 
Talk:Economy of Mozambique

message: On the section about Mozal's exports, quoted as "US$85.3", is that supposed to be in millions of USD? And is there citation for this figure? 
Obobskivich (talk) 10:02, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

message: Hello everyone, I am working for the International Trade Centre (ITC). I would like to propose the addition of an external link that could lead directly to the specific country’s trade data held by ITC. I would like you to consider this link under the WP:ELYES #3 prescriptions. Moreover, the reliability and the pertinence of this link can be supported by the following facts 
1) ITC is part of the United Nations
2) No registration is required
3) Trade data (imports/exports) are regularly updated
4) The link gives direct access to the trade database of the specific country
5) The addition of reliable trade data to the Economy section of the country could provide an appropriate contribution to the information therein contained. 
Thank you for your attention.Divoc (talk) 08:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ITC external link on trade data 

message: Article states that LNG prices are heavily tied to Crude, this of course isn't cited, then goes on to predict lower crude prices, if you believe that stop reading hear and short BZ, and thus Mozambique's Gas Resources will remain unexploited. This is of garbage, because it's all predictions and barely cited. Total and XOM have recently announced massive LNG trains in Mozambique, and Nat Gas has if anything more and more an inverse relationship with oil; lower oil prices less oil production, decreasing associated gas, less gas higher prices. Would anyone mind if I reshaped this a bit? Alcibiades979 (talk) 15:05, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  LNG in Mozambique
Talk:Erich Vermehren

message: well done all :) Fluffy999 03:32, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I beg to differ.  It was written like an adventure story, very un-encyclopedic.  I've rectified this as best I can but it may still have traces of narrative style Chrismorey (talk) 01:13, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awesome article 
Talk:Jenifer Lewis

message: Clearly written by an overzealous fan of Ms. Lewis. I've done some cleanup for NPOV but perhaps someone more familiar with her work would do a better job overhauling this page. --WWB 22:29, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV 2007

message: To add to this article: Lewis was also in History of the World, Part II. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 03:20, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also in ''[[History of the World, Part II]]''
Talk:David Limbaugh

message: While the book review that I reverted is factual, it has no context.  Is that the majority opinion of Limbaugh's book?  Without any context, the quote just looks like a definitive statement that the book was crap.  That can't be allowed with more proof.  Furthermore, I looked at the edit history of the IP address that added the critical comment, and apparently, said IP address has a long history of trying to slide POV comments into politically-oriented articles.  Duckdid 01:35, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverting book review 

message: :...He is the younger brother of talk radio host Rush Limbaugh. He has been married to his wife, Lisa, since 1986. ...
No, "David has been married to Lisa Limbaugh since 1986, and they have four children, three daughters, Christen Suzanne Limbaugh, born April 5, 1993, Courtney Leigh Limbaugh, born August 3, 1995, and Caitlyn Marie Limbaugh, born June 23, 1999, and a son, Scott Armstrong Limbaugh, born May 4, 2001." http://www.davidlimbaugh.com/bio.htm And Rush is married to Kathryn Rogers Limbaugh. FYI, Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 18:35, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Limbaugh is married to Rush Limbaugh's wife!? 

message: which is about the Justice Department under President Bill Clinton and Attorney General Janet Reno.... The title of the book sort of makes the second sentence redundant... do you agree? V. Joe (talk) 00:51, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Book thoughts

message: The official bio at Premiere Speakers says he and his wife have two daughters, not 5 children 
Are there three children from another source?  Prior marriage? adoption?  Or is the article wrong?
69.37.85.3 (talk) 08:40, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: "David has been married to Lisa Limbaugh since 1986, and they have four children, three daughters, Christen Suzanne Limbaugh, born April 5, 1993, Courtney Leigh Limbaugh, born August 3, 1995, and Caitlyn Marie Limbaugh, born June 23, 1999, and a son, Scott Armstrong Limbaugh, born May 4, 2001." http://www.davidlimbaugh.com/bio.htm . . . FYI, Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 18:35, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of children? 

message: She's notable, a rising Fox News contributor. Reading her for the first time, one wonders if this is Rush Limbaugh's daughter, partly because of the name but also because her passionately Christian articles seem quite unlike him. In fact, he's only her uncle, and her father David is a notable figure in his own right. Profhum (talk) 20:22, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Would someone please begin a wiki for Christen Limbaugh Bloom?