Talk:Chaos Legion

message: I remove the two FPSs.I added the dynasty wariors link, for two reasons 1)it is part in the same genre, action/hack and slash, and 2)it is often discribe as a blend of Devil May Cry and Dynasty Warriors.Merc25 06:18, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  gameply change 

message: :Image:Chaos legion.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:15, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Chaos legion.jpg

message: :Image:Arcia seig.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 08:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Arcia seig.jpg

message: How is this NPOV, at least in comparison to other video game articles?
It gives rankings from 2 sources for botht he PS2 & PC release.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.145.251.34 (talk) 15:33, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception & Neutrality 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:53, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: I own the novels, and each copyright page includes Capcom's logo and trademark. Here's a scan of the page from the first volume.
https://i.imgur.com/dvupilG.png
The gamw was published on March 6, 2003, before the main novels even came out. February 1, 2003 is the release date of the first volume, likely to release as closely as possible to the game. I think Capcom hired Tow a year or so before the game released (based on the JP wiki's supposed start date). Mobygames also lists Tow as "Novelization staff."
https://www.mobygames.com/game/12754/chaos-legion/credits/ps2/?autoplatform=true
On the other hand, I can't find any evidence that the novels came first. So I think this Wiki needs to be updated to reflect what appears to be a common misconception. Tenerezza habanero (talk) 00:19, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this really based on the novels, or is it the other way around?