Talk:Galactic Suite Design

message: 13 days into 2012, there's a new press release "sorry, we need two more years to make this even more complicated" (http://www.galacticsuiteprocess.com/news/?p=1415). Right. 68.49.23.150 (talk) 05:10, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree this is all probably a pipe dream, but the press release is talking about adding an EVA hatch for paying customers, not something outrageously far-fetched. Don't read anything more into it than what it specifically says. — Huntster (t @ c) 06:40, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definitely fake 

message: Does anyone know who the $3 billion invester is or what their launch vehicle with the "dual hybrid engines" will be like? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.4.139.136 (talk • contribs) 12:52, 13 August 2007  (UTC)
:Not at this time.  No mention on their website nor in the news articles.  Seems they want to be an anonymous benefactor.  Shame, because I'd love to try and talk him/her into donating to Bigelow Aerospace instead! (kidding, kidding.  Competition is good.) -- Huntster T • @ • C 18:09, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Investor

message: I've contacted the company for more information and hopefully some images that we are allowed to use on wikipedia. --Sebvdv 17:46, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While it is fine to contact them, be aware that unless the information is published, we cannot use it based on their word or an email from them alone.  Also, images are good, though it should be limited to a single fair-use image...unless they'd like to license one of them as free use. -- Huntster T • @ • C 21:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contacted the company 

message: Pretty pictures, but are they actually developing anything? 2012 is only four years away. --Apoc2400 (talk) 16:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: All we have right now is their word that they are developing something. Looking through the Google news archives, I don't notice any substantial updates since the original announcement, and the last news article (from February) on the site has zero new information. I have a feeling this entry, and the hotel, will go static before too long. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 01:33, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

text: That's quite possible, though its also possible that they simply realised such an effort would be nigh impossible and overly expensive. — Huntster (t @ c) 08:34, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real? 

message: As per my suggestion in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galactic Suite, I'd like to rename this article and rewrite it in the context of something about this design company.  I would still like to see some more sources about this company... in English (preferably) but other languages would be welcome.  Somebody who is bi-lingual and can help at least get the gist of what is in some of the Spanish-langauge articles written about this company would be very much appreciated.  --Robert Horning (talk) 00:16, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article rename to [[Galactic Suite Design]] 

message: While I have extreme doubts as to if this will amount to anything at all, it seems to be at least something noteworthy about Galactic Suit Design and is about the only thing which can reliably or verifiably be said that this organization even does.  The Barcelona Moon Team article is as pathetic of a stub as I've ever seen, and not much will be lost if it simply is redirected to this page as this article has more information on the topic anyway.  Perhaps this section could even be expanded somewhat.  I wasn't the original proposer of the merger, but I'm completely supportive in this case as the merger will help both articles considerably.  --Robert Horning (talk) 01:14, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm to original proposer of the merge (sorry, I forgot to post a comment here). Obviously I support the merge, and so I think I'll just go ahead and do it. Anxietycello (talk) 22:15, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

text: N2e, I've changed the inline templates to a single header...there's just no need for the duplication. However, I'm not entirely sure that it is needed. Nothing in the article is truly dated, in that specific material is out of date. The article simply states that certain things either happened or were announced at certain times. At this point, the only point in the article that even mentions a target date is the Criticism section, and it does so in a neutral manner. The article can and should certainly be expanded to deal with other aspects of the company, but I see no reason to start removing chunks out of the station section, when that is what the company is primarily known for, and at the time was (and still occasionally is) widely reported upon. (Not to mention, it certainly seems that it is *still* part of their business plan, not former.) — Huntster (t @ c) 08:44, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of [[Barcelona Moon Team]] 

message: NOTE to Robert Horning—I agree with your assessment that the notability of the orbital space facility plans of this company are suspect.  I have requested that the article sections that deal with those claims be updated, with citations.  If they are not, we will probably want to trim those sections back and re-focus the prose toward describing a failed/cancelled/never-funded orbital facility, and remove the undue emphasis on that aspect of GSD's former business plan.
I've also cleaned up and expanded just a bit to the Barcelona Moon Team section, which is, as you said, about the only part of this company that is currently active, notable and verifiable.  Cheers.  N2e (talk) 04:07, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: N2e, I've changed the inline templates to a single header...there's just no need for the duplication. However, I'm not entirely sure that it is needed. Nothing in the article is truly dated, in that specific material is out of date. The article simply states that certain things either happened or were announced at certain times. At this point, the only point in the article that even mentions a target date is the Criticism section, and it does so in a neutral manner. The article can and should certainly be expanded to deal with other aspects of the company, but I see no reason to start removing chunks out of the station section, when that is what the company is primarily known for, and at the time was (and still occasionally is) widely reported upon. (Not to mention, it certainly seems that it is *still* part of their business plan, not former.) — Huntster (t @ c) 08:44, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: more on Barcelona Moon Team, and the paucity of current info on the GSD orbital facility plans

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.designbuild-network.com/projects/galactic-suite/
*:Triggered by \bdesignbuild-network\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:31, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Galactic Suite Design. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aftenposten.no/reise/article1934576.ece
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927005457/http://www.googlelunarxprize.org/teams/barcelona-moon-team to http://www.googlelunarxprize.org/teams/barcelona-moon-team
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070916133051/http://www.googlelunarxprize.org/ to http://www.googlelunarxprize.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:03, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified