lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Killing Time

message: My expansion aims at explain the real facts behind the Killing Time. It had nothing at all to do-it has to be stressed-with armed resistance to the imposition of Episcopacy.
Rcpaterson 01:02, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Killing Times 

message: The caption on the image "Rev. James Guthrie, executed in 1661 for criticising Charles II's reintroduction of episcopacy" is a simplification at best.
James Guthrie (c. 1612–1661) was executed after the Restoration for high treason for his support of the "Western Remonstrance" (opposition to the rescinding of the Act of Classes), and his rejection of King's ecclesiastical authority. He was not the only man executed in 1661 for high treason (three others were and they had all actively opposed the Royalist faction in 1650-51).
That the authorities wanted him dead because of the trouble he might cause post the Restoration (rather than actions taken a decade before) may well be true -- similar arguments can be advanced for the execution of
Major Thomas Harrison -- but such a POV needs an authoritative modern academic source, and not an old source that has an axe to grind on this issue. -- PBS (talk) 14:39, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: James Guthrie

message: I've added an actual figure of the number of executions, something notably lacking in the article.
This also attempts to introduce the view of most contemporary historians which was that the "Killing Time" in the strictest definition, i.e. of repression through execution, transportation etc, was a phenomenon largely confined to the Cameronians, who were regarded as armed rebels against the government, and continued for a fairly short period. 19th century / folk historiography tended, under the influence of Wodrow, to fold it into general repression of Presbyterianism (hence the talk in some old books of perhaps thousands of deaths - I suppose the latter can be supported if you include every rebellion and military action Covenanting forces were invlved in.) The article should really distinguish between the 'Killing Time' as a phenomenon of popular culture and historiography and the summary excutions of suspected and actual Cameronians in 1680-5, some up to date academic sources might help.Svejk74 (talk) 13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Figures

message: Under result it is claimed: "Presbyterianism accepted in 1690 Act of Settlement." That's the result of the Dutch invasion of 1688, not the result of the Killing Times. Creuzbourg (talk) 16:18, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Result?
Talk:Van Dyne Crotty

message: Moved this here:
Copyright (c) 2006 Al Hoskins
 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2
 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation;
 with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
 A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU
 Free Documentation License".
I'm not sure what we do about these.--Rayc 01:02, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Necromancer (song)

message: Yeah, like this entire page is indecipherable. It should either be cleaned up seriously or deleted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sherick (talk • contribs) 00:16, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This makes no sense 

message: O'er is a poetic contraction of "over." If this came from Telleria, it is wrong. I speak Gaelic and that's no Gaelic word.
:fixed w/link to wiktionary for proof--Adavies42 (talk) 19:36, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  O'er
Talk:Tag editor

message: I tried to download EasyTAG and the website pointed to:
 easytag
There downloads are indicated at  "Sourceforge Download Area:"
 showfiles
That page states: "You have selected the 1.1 release.
Please choose the file that best matches your architecture or operating system from the list of files contained in this release. "
The choices are:
 	easytag-1.1-1_fc2.i386.rpm   Mirror   	710697  	1802  	i386  	.rpm
  	easytag-1.1-1_fc3.i386.rpm  Mirror 	709716 	6139 	i386 	.rpm
  	easytag-1.1-1_fc4.i386.rpm  Mirror 	699032 	1282 	i386 	.rpm
  	easytag-1.1-1_mdk101.i586.rpm  Mirror 	801366 	892 	i386 	.rpm
  	easytag-1.1-1.src.rpm  Mirror 	1117482 	940 	Any 	Source .rpm
  	easytag-1.1.tar.bz2  Mirror 	1112302 	5829 	Any 	Source .bz2
It is far from clear how one is to select what file to download.
What is meant by "architecture"?!?  Few would know the architecture of their system.  Do they mean OS?  If so, what file is for what OS?  As it happens, I do not recognize any of these files as being Windows install files...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.183.108.36 (talk) 04:48, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Install Issues 

message: I think we should at least mention TagScanner 5.0 (http://www.xdlab.ru/) imho one of the best (freeware) tag editors out there, supporting ogg, mp3, wma and tags from id3v1 to id3v2.4, ape, vorbis comments, maybe others.
Also a note of tag-related programming libraries might help, I can't help here but I know there are dozens of a varying degree of completeness.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.50.66.5 (talk) 06:08, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TagScanner and programming libraries 

message: I don't know much about this topic, but it seems to me that when you identify a song by recording it on your cell phone and sending it off to compare against known songs, it seems like more of an acoustic fingerprint kind of ID, rather than hash. 2_of_8 20:50, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cell phone identification - hash? 

message: I would like to suggest moving this article to Metadata editor, which is a more general term used to describe all tools used to edit metadata in files (including pictures and documents), while "tag editor" in usually used for describing software that supports editing metadata of multimedia file formats only. Dipru (talk) 21:27, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to [[Metadata editor]] 

message: I think music tag editors and image tag editors are both worthy of their own separate pages, and don't really have much to do with each other. Also I think a more succint term is tagger rather than tag editor
Ijabz (talk) 10:02, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. This article already fails notability mandate of Wikipedia; put it another, it does not deserve its own article. So, please think of more pressing concerns than a split that might bring about the doom of the article. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 15:02, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split page
Talk:Incidental catch

message: The page title is probably too non-distinct - maybe add (fisheries) or (fishing)? SM247 01:11, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:USS Augusta (SSN-710)

message: I have removed this sentance: Augusta successfully prevented efforts to tow K-219 back to the Soviet Union.,
please can somebody explain how this was done and more pentinently, why it was done, and provide a reference? --Jackyd101 01:12, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a novel, not a Reliable Source. 50.111.42.37 (talk) 23:30, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

message: Bow torpedo tubes ???
I have been told that the "Los Angeles"-class submarines have four torpedo tubes mounted near amidships, and not in the bow. The bows of these boats are reserved for their immense sonar receivers, hence they are not interrupted by torpedo rooms, torpedo tubes, and all that bulk, and the accompanying noise generated by them. Get on the ball with the facts, please.47.215.183.159 (talk) 02:43, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bow torpedo tubes ??? 

message: This article states that this is the second USN ship named for Augusta, ME. However, this news article states that the new LCS Augusta will be the second: WABI News— Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.150.236.59 (talk) 17:29, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The news article is correct and this page has been updated. - wolf 19:06, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second USN ship named for Augusta, ME? 

message: Eindride Tyrssen (talk) 00:27, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken links?
Wikipedia talk:List of administrators

message: I don't get this paragraph. As far as I understand, users can completely disable emailing in their preferences if they choose to. So no, they cannot "still be contacted by using the "email this user" link on the left side of their userpage or talk page", regardless of whether or not they have "listed their email addresses" somewhere. If they disabled the link it won't show up. -- œ™ 04:03, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: "Administrators who have not listed their email addresses can still be contacted..."

message: Is there a list or category that covers former administrators? I was unable to find one.Dialectric (talk) 19:14, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Answering my own question, the list is at Wikipedia:Former administrators.Dialectric (talk) 00:03, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former Admins? 

message: has suddenly removed about 20 administrators from the lists. Only one has been desysopped, and none have made an edit that changed their ranking. What's going on? 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 12:49, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rickbot 

message: I considered splitting the list of bots with administrator permission into one list, to better management. Because bots and humans are different and so adminbots should not be counted as active administrators. Thingofme (talk) 10:43, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bots with administrator permission
Talk:Neal Powless

message: This article originally cited birth and death dates of 1926-1993, but then went on to say that he played for teams in 1994 and 1998 (a truly impressive feat, if he was already dead.) Can anybody confirm his proper birth and/or death dates? Thanks. Bearcat 01:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Those are Ross Powless's dates. I did the the articles about the Powlesses around the same time and obviously got confused. Great story if it was true, though, although maybe not to Neal. John FitzGerald 17:05, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Han (Chinese surname)

message: I see no reason to misreport the man's name as Wan when it is Bi Wan. Hanfresco 04:30, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wan vs Bi Wan 

message: You might like to add a section on this page about Charlie Soong. He was born 韓教準 and some third or fourth generation family members still live here in Hainan (this is first hand knowledge, not Original research)  :). They probably arrived during the Ming Dynasty but that is oral history so I cannot confirm. Best, Philg88 (talk) 14:06, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charlie Soong 

message: A Han chinese lineage named 韩 became khitanized during the Liao dynasty
Page 88
http://cces.snu.ac.kr/article/jces3_4biran.pdf
Rajmaan (talk) 03:12, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  韩 Lineage during the Liao dynasty 
Talk:Chalcanthum

message: (cont. from edit summaries) Well, you could start by including some kind of noun, eg. "compound," "substance," etc. to describe the subject of the article. Readers should not have to pore through the Alchemy article to find out what the hell is being discussed.  By the way, disagreements about an edit should be resolved on the talk page, not by swift, unreasonable reverts. And "add context" is a rather rude, flippant reply in any case. KyleGarvey 01:29, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Context

message: Is it okay if I format this as a dab page? It practically is one already, and it should be, because it's about a word rather than a specific substance. —Keenan Pepper 23:34, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format
Talk:C Television

message: * New television station to launch today (June 5th 2006) - Trinidad and Tobago Express
CaribDigita 01:33, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:List of Miss USA titleholders

message: Shouldn't this be renamed to List of Miss USA titleholders? (considering Moakler & Sherwood merely inherited the crown, and did not win it?)  Will move in a few days if there is no objection... -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 21:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: I've just completed some major edits.  I removed the pageant location information because I believe it relates more to the pageant events rather than the titleholders.  This has made room for more pertinent information, such as their hometown, age & height.  I've also removed the colspans etc to make the table fully sortable.  Please discuss here if you see any issues with this.  I plan to continue referencing the rest of the article (I had worked on this for over an hour today when I accidentally clicked a link and lost my work!). PageantUpdater  talk • contribs  13:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation of major edits 
Talk:Mikveh Israel Cemetery

message: I think the current site is much less than an acre. --evrik 15:05, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree. I'm not sure from which source I drew the 3-acre figure, but the site's Web page mentions a survey of 127 ft x 60 ft, and if this is the current size, then it's 7,620 sq ft, which is about 0.175 acre, one acre being 43,560 sq ft. I've changed the article to indicate a size of < 0.2 acres, only about 1/15 the aforementioned 3 acres. EdK 22:28, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

text: By the way, very nice photographs. EdK 22:30, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Size
Talk:Miss Teen USA

message: I see recent news about "textortion".  I doubt it could be true since that isn't even a word.  That spanks of "story made by a liar" right up front.  It's likely a media blitz.  in the article I see more advertising from Microsoft:
Robert Siciliano, a McAfee online security expert, told ABC News preventing cyber crime should begin with making sure Internet users have the most up-to-date antivirus software, browser and operating system.
“It’s through your browser -- that is often how your PC gets infected,” he said. “I usually recommend people use Chrome since it automatically updates.”
Yet it's been in the news that CA McAfee have had a revolving door with the government and have been caught releasing viruses and doing "heavy marketing".
That aside: it's well known that the government, police, and hackers have all badly hacked web browsers so they can spy.  It's "good software" however the idea you can sit infront of a camera and they can't get to it?  Forget it.  They can.  They made sure it was broken in that way. SO DID foreigners from other countries (yup - their "additions" go nearly unchecked).
Saying "update frequently" is an absolute lie and they know it.  We've heard that lie since 1980's.  Anthony Wierner (Mayor hopeful) was fully updated: and exthorted publicly.  And updating often causes need of hardware purchases, classicly.
If it were real the news wouldn't advertise it because if she's a teen seeking anonymity from lewd and lecivious libel they are the ones exthorting her am i right ?
anyway.  we are stock full of CA teens flooding our internet with text.  thank you.  we couldn't notice if it were true we are so flooded.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sven nestle2 (talk • contribs) 03:14, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  recent news doubtful 

message: : Why exactly the classifications are fancruft?, those are objective statistics. On reflex the number of classification, that is all. Thanks. --Mauriziok (talk) 15:31, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ¿Fancruft? 

message: Prior to the election, in violation of journalistic integrity, somebody wiped this page of all references to Donald Trump, who was a major character in the Miss Teen USA story. Now that the election is over, this page needs to be unedited back to is original state. Sleepspace (talk) 23:51, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you be more specific? Because this article has had a similar content for the last 6 years. (CC) Tbhotch™ 01:56, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

text: Probably you are confusing it with either Miss Universe or Miss USA. Of course, Teen USA lacks the historical background and is practically a list of winners, but unless someone wants to add that information, it most likely will remain like this. (CC) Tbhotch™ 21:13, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page needs to be edited back 

message: First miss Teen USA was Peggy Collings of Lake Charles. Lousgal (talk) 02:36, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misspelled name
Talk:Florissant, Colorado

message: I will remove the last part of the description, as that sounds like an advertisement in 1 week if nobody objects. HeyThereJimmy 14:13, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ad?
Talk:Hayman Fire

message: The first paragraph of the article is talking about how big the Hayman Fire was,giving landmarks, but nowhere in the introductory paragraph does it mention the acreage that burned.  I would think that's kinda important when you're talking about how large the fire was.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.16.33.230 (talk) 19:43, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

message: Can anyone explain why it is called the "Hayman Fire"?  There is nothing in the article to suggest how it got the name.  Skinsmoke (talk) 16:37, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Pennsylvania Convention Center

message: There is some additional material that may be relevant to the Pennsylvania Convention Center at Talk:Market East Station (Philadelphia).  I removed it from the Market East material as extranous but may be useful here.-- danntm T C 02:51, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Some possible useful material

message: I'm surprised it hasn't been mentioned in the article yet, but I believe the Conv Center used to be the old train shed of the Reading Railroad. Gonna take a stab at writing a little tidbit about it (referencing information from Reading Terminal wiki page).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.53.52.202 (talk) 19:49, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reading Railroad Trainshed
Talk:Autódromo Internacional de Curitiba

message: It was announced a Brazil A1 Grand Prix on March 16, 2007 for 2006-07 A1GP season. Though there's no circuit information available it can be predicted that the Curitiba racing course will be used or it will be removed at all likewise in the previous year.
: User:Morio removed it on 24 November 2006 02:28 with the notice: "Should not write a guess. For this circuit, it might be difficult to hold A1 on March 18, 2007, because it has been announced to hold a first race of World Touring Car Championship on March 11..."
:: But it's still in the event calendar on a1gp.com! It's not known where it would be held, but one of the motor racing venues in Brazil announced. --Yuriy Lapitskiy 06:43, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  However, I agree that Autódromo José Carlos Pace or Autódromo Internacional Nelson Piquet can be used as well, though one can easily predict that the situation will be as in 2006. We'll see... --Yuriy Lapitskiy 06:48, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A1 Grand Prix 2007 issue 

message: Add external link to race-game.org--Cheetaih (talk) 05:00, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Link
Talk:Miss Puerto Rico

message: El mejor Vestido de la Historia de los concursos de Belleza
Zuleyka Rivera miss Universe 2006,
Carlos Alberto Diseñador  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.237.167.108 (talk) 04:39, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Puerto Rico has 25 miss universe placements not 24 that was last year and they continued to place this year in the Top 5. Salina828 (talk) 03:18, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Placements
Talk:Tarvaris Jackson

message: While searching for citations for this article, I ran into this page http://www.giftsforfootballfans.com/helmets_216.htm and noticed large sections of it were word-for-word identical to sections of this article. It looked like this entry was a blatant copy/paste ripoff, until I noticed the very bottom of that page links to this article. I can only assume the author of that pge did the copy/paste from here, not vice versa. An honest mistake, hopefully this will serve as a notice for future editors. ---Jackel 14:21, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, a lot of people copy the articles at Wikipedia and put them at their own site.  Not much you can do about it.  -- 24.118.89.238 Sept 04, 2006
I removed the poorly sourced and irrelevent (to the subject of the article) lines about the upcoming NFL draft.Dakotab 19:35, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mis-tagged for copyright violation 

message: Tavaris Jackson is currently a member of the seattle seahawks and the page should be changed to reflect such.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.64.154.87 (talk) 07:51, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Players cannot officially sign until Friday. Eagles 24/7 (C) 14:27, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Editing (unlocked) 

message: Death:4/13/2020. 24.98.245.187 (talk) 14:27, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Sources indicate he died April 12. Eagles 24/7 (C) 14:28, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 April 2020
Talk:Abertay University

message: I have a hazy recollection that Maurice Malpas is an Abertay graduate. Am I correct? 82.18.174.37 01:42, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Maurice Malpas

message: (I'm posting this to all articles on UK universities as so far discussion hasn't really taken off on Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities.)
There needs to be a broader convention about which university rankings to include in articles. Currently it seems most pages are listing primarily those that show the institution at its best (or worst in a few cases). See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Universities#University ratings. Timrollpickering 22:06, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: University ratings

message: The link for Bernard King leads to a retired baseball player! Perhaps somebody should make a page for the principal. ;) I don't know where to start, myself, but someone who's more familiar with Abertay would. 91.153.199.246 17:42, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bernard King 

message: The picture entitled 'kidd building' is incorrect, as the building is actually the 'Kydd' building. I just came across this when browsing the page, so I am requesting an edit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.218.44.255 (talk) 23:08, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Kydd Building Picture' 

message: The source cited for the Guardian ranking does not appear to have Abertay at 48 as is indicated in the rankings box in the article - it would seem to be 85, so I have amended accordingly Dunarc (talk) 21:14, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2023 rankings
Talk:Order of battle

message: The opening section of this article is written in total military speak - isn't the purpose of an encyclopaedia to make a concept understandable to a general or wider audience?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.185.240.123 (talk) 12:03, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

message: My hat's off to the graphics maker. I know they're hard to make, but these are so full of errors  they need to be pulled down and re-done by someone smarter than me who knows how  to do it. I'll be glad to help. For example, the WW1 one has artillery battalions labeled as batteries and I have no idea what the symbology is for the division troops, but that isn't anything the Army uses. Any army. The 1989 one has stars for the brigades/DIVARTY, which should have an "X" (not sure what the star is supposed to represent, and these units were commanded by colonels so it's not because of any generals), and has some organization called a "staff company" that should be relabeled as an HHC (Headquarters and Headquarters Company). The graphic for the MI battalion is also wrong. As I wrote, I'm willing to help with the new graphics, but I don't know how to do it myself. CsikosLo (talk) 19:34, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graphics