lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:County Borough of West Ham

message: Hello – would like to propose merging the following articles as they cover the same geographic area
-	County Borough of West Ham
-	West Ham 
Merging the two would form a good foundation for others to develop and refine the articles – having the choice arguably deters this.
Something similar could be done for many of the County Borough\Metropolitan borough areas in London as they are often based on coterminous ancient parishes.
In terms of content I would just seek to merge the shorter ‘West Ham’ article into the fuller County Borough article without removing any information apart form duplication.
What do people think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlasdairDaw (talk • contribs) 17:51, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Proposed the above in October and had no objections. So will procede, I don't believe my draft cuts hardly anything except repetition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlasdairDaw (talk • contribs) 10:03, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

text: This is a spectacularly bad idea as London neighbourhoods rarely - if ever - map to former parishes and boroughs. MRSC (talk) 13:14, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: This page should never have been merged with West Ham. The parish county/borough was a much larger area than the locality of West Ham (which still exists). MRSC (talk) 18:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Unmerge
Talk:FMNH PR2081

message: This article seems fine although the name is a bit odd anyway I have linked Sue here for those of us not accustomed to entering archive indicies into the search. Bass fishing physicist 21:05, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there was discussion recently around Jane, the conclusion being that there shouldn't be seperate articles for individual specimens, but that this info should be in the genus article. I could be wrong, you may want to bring it up on WP:Dinosaurs. Dinoguy2 14:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange article name
Talk:Lorcan O'Herlihy

message: Passages like "Lorcan’s professional practice has been coupled with intellectual rigor since the inception of his office. " seems not to go with our neutral point of view policies. --wL<speak·check> 10:30, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV dispute 

message: This article sort of has references, but they are listed in the External Links and not used as footnotes/references to the facts in the article text. Please remove the articles from the External Links and use them / Cite as references to the facts/statements in the article. Stesmo (talk) 19:26, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Veterans' Bill of Rights

message: This article should cover ASAP the bill's legal status (statute? declaration?) and enactment date. Little detail available at the moment. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 21:10, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: legal status
Talk:Frenesi

message: I just wanted to point out, the mistranslation "love me tenderly" comes directly from the vocals of one of the versions with lyrics. 01:49, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Abantidas

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KGV 04:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.--Lamassus (talk) 22:04, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:The Troubles in Kilrea

message: *"We suspect collusion"
*"was brutally murdered"
*Article seems to focus on loyalist murders.
« Keith t/e » 21:15, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: (Copied from User talk:Keithgreer) That's not strictly true is it? What about Hubert Gilmore (ex-UDR),  Thomas Gibson (Irish Rangers) ? I'm not sure if any of the IRA bombs caused any fatalities. « Keith t/e » 21:31, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

text: That's because generally these The Troubles in... pages should only contain incidents "resulting in two or more fatalities". « Keith t/e » 21:36, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality issues
Talk:Antelope air defence system

message: I removed the proposed deletion tag, as I don't think that this article really warrants it.  Glancing at the first few links that came up in Google search, it seems like there might be some information on the web that could be integrated into the article.  Furthermore, the fact that there isn't a ton on the web about it doesn't mean that there isn't information available to expand and verify the topic; I wouldn't be surprised if there were off-line publications that specialize in this sort of thing that could provide additional information. --Clay Collier 11:08, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Deletion
Talk:Cadillac Allanté

message: I remember an episode of the TV show Rides where Jay Leno converted an Oldsmobile Toronado into a rear wheel drive car and added a 1200 HP GM crate engine. I wonder if he or anyone else could do the same with the Allante and a Northstar V-8. And003 (talk) 19:03, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  RWD Allante? 

message: The article says that early ones were sold to fleets and the postal service.  I'm having a very hard time believing that.  Recommend that bit be deleted. Carguy1701 (talk) 05:20, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early sales
Talk:Carnival of Santiago de Cuba

message: Does anyone else feel that the mix of English and Spanish in the title is wrong ? If this should be in Spanis, it should be Carnaval de Santiago de Cuba; if English, Carnival of Santiago de Cuba. -- Beardo (talk) 01:34, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct. Corrected. --Qyd (talk) 14:30, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name 
Talk:P'uykan

message: Does anyone have more information on this article?  I've never heard of P'uykan.  Is this supposed to be some Chinese transliteration of the Tuvan word Burkhan?  Does it refer to Burkhanism?  Ak Jang was an Altai religion.  I've never seen it in the context of the Tuvans. --Stacey Doljack Borsody 21:37, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Huh?
Talk:Westfield Stratford City

message: I'm sceptical that it will be the biggest in Europe as Cevahir Mall seems to be urban, in Europe, and considerably larger - it probably would be the biggest shopping centre in the EU though (provided that something else doesn't get built or expanded first).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Escottf (talk • contribs) 22:30, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: biggest in Europe

message: I know nothing about shopping centres, but do not understand why Westfield London is not on the list. The main Westfield London page tells us that after the extension was opened, it became the largest shopping centre (mall) in Europe. It is certainly bigger than Westfield Stratford (which is on the list, and is on the other side of London).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.71.12.233 (talk) 14:13, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Westfield London (NOT Stratford)
Talk:London Thames Gateway Development Corporation

message: ... is for sale, 193.132.104.10 (talk) 16:28, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: The linked website

message: Now appears to be a spam website - what should be done with the link here? Jackiespeel (talk) 15:05, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The website 

message: As the website is non-accessible, is there a Wayback Machine or other link? Jackiespeel (talk) 22:44, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organisation website
Talk:Lycian language

message: Froma, LATIN English. Proper Time form/pro-unciation
lycendac, lycini, lyco (lite) an L. 
Lucian sa-en. Semi Proto Time
Lih kon . Gebraic / Grama 
Lochain. Irsak 
Lesane . Frak
Lisia, Lish, Liz. Post Time
Lashan, Lazean, Lacoan. Rumaic 
L. esan 
L. uxin
L. ocen
L. ysan
wh. Sa Xa Ca Si Co Xo Xi Se Ce Cu Zuoaei n. Steve0077 (talk) 06:27, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  LLIXX ON
Talk:Heart Cheshire and North East Wales

message: Sections of this article were printed in the Wrexham Evening Leader celebrating Marcher's 25th Birthday in September 2008, which seemed a little disjointed so perhaps I'll clarify the article slightly... actually, is it still true Buzz 97.1 is broadcast from Gwersyllt? /Marbles (talk) 20:01, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't this article be renamed Heart Cheshire and North East Wales? TheRetroGuy (talk) 19:57, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 
Talk:Chimoio

message: During the Zimbabwean liberation struggle, Chimoio was the location of one of the worst atrocities that the Rhodesian army perpetrated against the black Zimbabweans at a refugee camp there. Thousands were killed, most of them unarmed women and children. It is widely believed that a former freedom fighter become informant called Nyathi, was responsible for the betrayal that caught the camp unawares. Its also widely believed that Nyathi was stabbed, murdered in broad day light in 1980 after independence at Mbare Musika, the biggest market place in Zimbabwe. Teixant 21:53, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Dear Licor, since when was the status of Mozambique as a Portuguese colony a matter of "point of view"?
I think most historians would agree that Mozambique was a Portuguese colony, "de facto" even if its "de jure" status was cosmetically changed to an overseas province (and later even to state) to fend off international criticism. I think we should call things by their proper name. Teixant (talk) 10:27, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colony? 
Talk:GCap Media

message: Suggest not merging with Global - due to the long history of GCap, and retaining this article up to the merger.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.149.31.226 (talk) 16:22, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: Have tidied up a number of sections as it seemed blurred between how GCap was run and how Global ran the stations after they took over. For example, the rebranding exercise to Heart was carried out after the stations had been sold to Global and therefore it doesn't really form part of GCaps history. Therefore I've grouped the former One Network stations together and given them their original names.94.193.3.133 (talk) 18:56, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  GCap / Global 
Talk:Kiron Lenses

message: The result of the AfD debate on Kino precision Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kino precision was to merge that article into this one.  Note that there is no new information from that article to merge so I have merely changed it to a redirect.  It was noted in the AfD that it seemed unusual to merge the company into the brand name but that was the consensus.  Any proposal to merge this page back to the parent company and make the redirect point to the company should be discussed on the talk page before proceeding. Arkyan • (talk) 21:58, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from [[Kino precision]]

message: The article implies Minolta invented autofocus, they did not, Honeywell did: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F0CE3DB1631F931A1575BC0A964958260 , although Kiron may have licensed from Minolta before the lawsuit was settled. Suggest simply removing "Minolta" since the history of autofocus is beyond the scope of this page.
Mattman944 (talk) 05:30, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Minolta's patent 

message: 22XXX serial 28mm f/2.5 lens added to list of 35mm lenses. 92.40.9.149 (talk) 21:14, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  22XXX serial 28mm f/2.5 lens added to list of 35mm lenses.
Talk:Port Louis, Falkland Islands

message: Is partially correct.  Guns and powder stores were destroyed according to Duncan's log, the Argentine Government claims that the whole settlement was destroyed.  The people living there took the opportunity to leave because the place was pretty miserable and they claimed Vernet had lied about the conditions of the settlement.  Never seen any source claiming malnutrition was a factor.  Would someone review and edit accordingly please, seems whatever I do dormant accounts spring up to edit war. Justin talk 12:01, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Made an edit.  It no longer mentions malnutrition, and also doesn't say "most" any more (since I assume that our readers are aware that 40 is more than 24). Pfainuk talk 20:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latest Edit by Az81964444 

message: Archived: There was no support for this idea. Xyl 54 (talk) 23:59, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: "There is no inflated 20th century significant, both articles deals with the same settlement, so why don't fuse them? The Viceroyalty of the Rio de la Plata, the United Provinces of the River Plate and Argentina is a bad analogy, because the are succesor states but nothing known as succesor settlements. Then we all have to see each articles lenght, they are not so long so they could properly fit together. Chiton magnificus (talk) 16:23, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge tag 
Talk:Taça Brasil

message: I couldn't find a source that states that the Taça Brasil can be compared, in importance level, to the Campeonato Brasileiro. I understand that it was the only national competition by then, but it was played only among state champions, in knockout rounds. In 1967, the Roberto Gomes Pedrosa (Taça de Prata) was created, in a round robin dispute among the major brazilian teams, much more alike the present Campeonato Brasileiro. And this creation didn't extinguish the Taça Brasil, which was played until 1969. Therefore, there were two national champions in 1967, 1968 and 1969, the cup winner (Taça Brasil) and the championship winner (Roberto Gomes Pedrosa). Roberto Gomes Pedrosa was extinguished in 1971, when the first Campeonato Brasileiro was played. To elevate Taça Brasil to the same importance level as Roberto Gomes Pedrosa and Campeonato Brasileiro is a mistake, since it was easier to win. For example, a team from Rio de Janeiro or São Paulo could win it only playing four games (Semi-finals and finals). Mindarolho 22:18, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:Smart Girl (Drake & Josh)

message: In the episode data of Josh Runs into Oprah, it says that, that episode was the second episode where Josh and Drake kissed on the lips, and Smart Girl was the first one, where they kiss on the lips..
Why is there no mention?
I'm going to add it.
 Megan :)  03:31, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: .. The Trivia Section
Talk:Booster pack

message: The number of examples here seems somewhat excessive.  I'm going to prune it down to a couple different variations of packing, unless somebody objects.Chunky Rice 22:21, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that seems reasonable.  Yes I agree that it's gotten a little out of hand, since we just needed a few demonstrative examples. -- Slordak 13:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples

message: The article on the Battlefield series links here but the makers of Battlefield seem to use Booster pack to mean a mini-expansion pack. I think the alternative use of the term should be mentioned. Sdmitch16 (talk) 09:09, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meanings of Booster pack
Talk:Badger Army Ammunition Plant

message: I have been going through and trying to tie in my references to the text of the article.  If anyone knows a way to clean up the look of the references please do so.  After you start cleaning it up, I should get the drift of how to do that and the references process should go much easier.  Hopefully I can site all my references.  So much comes from memory because I work at Badger and deal with the history every day.  But I think I should be able to find independant and verifiable third party articles, reports, and books to back me up.  Thanks for all the help so far!  Smchase 18:36, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References Linkage

message: Article states "Demolition of the Army manufacturing infrastructure began in 2004 and is expected to be complete in 2014." Anybody have an update? 15:32, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need an update since 2014
Talk:Sişu & Puya

message: Shouldn't the page be renamed to Sişu si Puya or Sişu & Puya, and La Familia should serve as a redirect to the new page? --Credema 22:25, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to Sişu si Puya 
Talk:Interpleader

message: The phrase "(Current Version)" should be replaced with "as of" and the date that the version was last verified to be current.  If the law changes, the federal government will not automatically update Wikipedia to say that the version here is no longer current.  We should not call something "current" if someone might see the article at a future time when it will no longer be current.
71.109.164.90 (talk) 03:40, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "current" version is not precise
Talk:Replevin

message: Is the Wisconsin statement true?  A quick search turned up an article saying repossession has been allowed since 2006.  Did they change back?  Is this still current?
http://www.wisbar.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Wisconsin_Lawyer&template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&contentid=63191  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnmoe (talk • contribs) 00:18, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wisconsin? 

message: In Northup v. Epps in Lousiana in 1853, the court issued a writ of replevin to the sheriff of Avoyelles Parish.  The property that the sheriff was to take into custody was the plaintiff himself.  He was held in slavery but claimed to be a free person abducted and sold as a slave.  The papers were served on the defendant Epps and the sheriff took Northup into custody on a Sunday, and the hearing was held the following day, at which the plaintiff prevailed and then quickly left the state and went back to his native New York.
: 
Should that example be mentioned here?  Michael Hardy (talk) 19:32, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plaintiff = property? 

message: This article was moved from Replevin to Claim and delivery in September 2014, with http://global.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/498381/replevin as the edit summary.  I've never heard of the phrase "claim and delivery" though.  Articles should have the most common name.  Do we have any other reliable sources to show that "claim and delivery" is the normal term now? --Closeapple (talk) 10:38, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The official term in Rule 64 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is still Replevin. However, many states, when creating statutory remedies to codify and replace common law replevin (and detinue and trover) have used the term "claim and delivery," cf. "Action of Claim and Delivery"| in the South Carolina Bench Book for Summary Court Judges. Also see [here for a source dating to 1883 attesting to "claim and delivery" used when codifying the right in State statutes. John Thacker (talk) 14:28, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most common name
Talk:Aristobulus IV

message: zero references on this page  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stellarkid (talk • contribs) 03:38, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Santa Paravia en Fiumaccio

message: Renamed from 'Santa Paravia and Fiumaccio, since that was the original name of the game in the Softside article.  From the actual source code as published in SoftSide:
300 CLS:PRINT:PRINT:PRINT"SANTA PARAVIA EN FIUMACCIO":PRINT:FORA=1TO16:READA$:NEXT
Also see http://www.santaparavia.com/Home.aspx for a screenshot of the original cover art.
Nibios 01:49, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Santa Paravia en Fiumaccio
Talk:Counterclaim

message: The present version of the article (2017-08-08) has three versions of the name: 'counterclaim' (in the title), 'counter-claim' (in the first line), and 'counter claim' (i.c.w. 'cross claim') as a sub-title and in the text. Which one is correct? --VanBuren (talk) 13:31, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Talk:Diatonic set theory

message: The article uses the term "diatonic" extensively, but without adequate explanation. This term, along with "chromatic", is the cause of serious uncertainties at several other Wikipedia articles, and in the broader literature. Some of us thought that both terms needed special coverage, so we started up a new article: Diatonic and chromatic. Why not have a look, and join the discussion? Be ready to have comfortable assumptions challenged!
– Noetica♬♩ Talk 22:24, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Diatonic and chromatic

message: The David Rothenberg credited in this article is _not_ the David Rothenberg born in 1962 who is a still-living professor of music.  The David Rothenberg who published in Mathematical Systems Theory in 1978 would have been born in the late 1920's or early 1930's, and is deceased.  Both are composers.  The elder one was also a mathematician.  I redirected the link to the article Rothenberg_propriety.   See also:  http://lumma.org/tuning/faq/  Sojambi Pinola (talk) 16:34, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: David Rothenberg
Talk:Myhill's property

message: The article uses the term "diatonic" without adequate explanation. This term, along with "chromatic", is the cause of serious uncertainties at several other Wikipedia articles, and in the broader literature. Some of us thought that both terms needed special coverage, so we started up a new article: Diatonic and chromatic. Why not have a look, and join the discussion? Be ready to have comfortable assumptions challenged!
– Noetica♬♩ Talk 22:24, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Diatonic and chromatic
Talk:Generic and specific intervals

message: The article uses the term "diatonic" without adequate explanation. This term, along with "chromatic", is the cause of serious uncertainties at several other Wikipedia articles, and in the broader literature. Some of us thought that both terms needed special coverage, so we started up a new article: Diatonic and chromatic. Why not have a look, and join the discussion? Be ready to have comfortable assumptions challenged!
– Noetica♬♩ Talk 22:24, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Diatonic and chromatic
Talk:Common tone

message: The article uses the term "diatonic" without adequate explanation. This term, along with "chromatic", is the cause of serious uncertainties at several other Wikipedia articles, and in the broader literature. Some of us thought that both terms needed special coverage, so we started up a new article: Diatonic and chromatic. Why not have a look, and join the discussion? Be ready to have comfortable assumptions challenged!
– Noetica♬♩ Talk 22:24, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Diatonic and chromatic

message: I believe the E sharp cannot be a common of F natural although they're enharmonic equivalent.--89.14.97.40 (talk) 18:15, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: A scale with the deep scale property, such as the diatonic scale, has a unique number of occurrences of each interval class. Since the diatonic scale has two semitones, it can't have two tritones. You appear to be correct. Hyacinth (talk) 03:37, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

text: See: Talk:Identity (music)#Interval vs. Sum. Hyacinth (talk) 09:44, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  F sharp major