Talk:Protein tertiary structure

message: I'd really like to see a good citation for the assertion about de novo tertiary structure prediction being feasable as of 2007 - it's been about 18 months since I properly studied this, but the tutors I had then were pretty dubious of it.
Once I've dug out some notes/refs I'll probably expand this a bit - certainly could do with a brief mention of circular oligopeptide structure prediction, which is pretty well establised, IIRC.
Spidrak 18:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article was moved from Tertiary structure as a result of a proposal at WT:MCB.  Tertiary structure now redirects to Biomolecular structure instead.  Antony-22 (talk) 20:32, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Massive reorganization of biomolecular structure articles

message: Hi, I've finished copy editing this article. Let me know if you would like more work done on it. Regards, Myrtle. Myrtlegroggins (talk) 08:02, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit

message: I've been looking at this article as part of a contributor copyright investigation. A user copied two sentences directly from http://www.elmhurst.edu/~chm/vchembook/567tertprotein.html, one of them is more or less still there ("The tertiary structure is determined by a variety of bonding interactions between amino acid side chains"). Is there another way to word this accurately without using the source's exact wording? Alternatively if I took this sentence out would the text that follows it still make sense? January (talk) 22:25, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi January, sure there is. "Amino acid side chains may interact and bond in a number of ways. The interactions and bonds of side chains within a particular protein determine its tertiary structure." Regards, Myrtle. Myrtlegroggins (talk) 22:35, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Perfect, thank you! January (talk) 09:36, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: Substituted at 03:29, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Protein tertiary structure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718132234/http://swift.cmbi.ru.nl/teach/B1/ to http://swift.cmbi.ru.nl/teach/B1/
*Added archive https://archive.is/20060516235754/http://predictioncenter.gc.ucdavis.edu/Center.html to http://predictioncenter.gc.ucdavis.edu/Center.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:32, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Domains belong in the realm of tertiary structures. Alpha helices and beta strands are secondary structure elements. Even a beta sheet (a parallel or antiparallel arrangement of beta-strands) is not a tertiary structure, it is a super-secondary structure element.
I will not change it btw in order to not get punished for "vandalism". I suggest the original author or a moderator take care of that.
--Felix Tritschler (talk) 13:47, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secondary structures are NOT domains!