Talk:Interstate 94

message: I think the lane configuration section is fairly superfluous.  Are we really going to sum out exactly where, everywhere the route widens?  It seems a bit much.  --Alexwcovington (talk) 07:10, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I vote that it's not too much, but it might better belong on articles like Interstate 94 (Illinois) to nail things down to a regional perspective. --Rob 15:22, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There has already been a precedent set: Interstate 95 in New Jersey. CrazyC83 01:23, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Lane configurations

message: Something is fishy with the lengths;
*352 	566 	North Dakota
*260 	421 	Minnesota
*351 	569 	Wisconsin
In miles, North Dakota has a longer section; in kilometers, Wisconsin does. --BaronLarf 18:01, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
:Using 1.606344 km/mile, and taking the mile lengths as "correct" (which I'm inclined to believe come from mileposts, so I'm willing to make that assumption--I'll check Minnesota next time I'm up to the cities...I thought it was "only" 258 mi., but whatever:), the km lengths should be:  ND 566.489088 MN 418.42944 and WI 564.879744.  Round them how you like.  Tomer TALK 18:40, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
::I completely redid the lengths, using sourced data from the United States Department of Transportation--BaronLarf 20:41, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
:::Hey, check you sig figs on your calculations TShilo12!:)--Gephart 02:20, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that was fun.  Don't tell my physics profs I did that! :-p  Tomer TALK 02:44, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length 

message: I'm all for them, but the article is really long. Something should be done. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs)  01:43, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Move them to state pages, such as Interstate 94 in Montana, Interstate 94 in North Dakota, etc. Once completed, they will be EXTREMELY long. Those pages should also have the history of the Interstates within the state, lane configurations, traffic counts, etc. (For shorter Interstates, like Interstate 26 and Interstate 45, as well as for all three-digit Interstates and most non-Interstate freeways, they belong on the main page) CrazyC83 01:26, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's not long enough. You need to ramp it up. Wahkeenah 01:45, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Exit lists

message: I deleted this reference to North I-94 in Port Huron.  I've been on this road many times and have never heard of it before.  I've even attached picture counterevidence in the description.  I refer you to http://www.state-ends.com/michigan/i94/ for picture evidence that it is still called West I-94/I-69. KelleyCook 15:26, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I-94 North/South in Port Huron

message: Note: Only major junctions go into the Interstate routebox... these would be other Interstates, and weird things (turnpikes, etc). For primary interstates with several junctions you may need to have 2di junctions only (plus the terminii of course) and delete the 3di junctions. Otherwise the routebox becomes way too big. If any routebox has over 10 or so junctions, then some of the junctions need to be removed. (Interstate Hwy WikiProject)  Uh, where does it say only major interstates?  just wondering. --master_sonLets talk 22:57, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Justifying adding JCT with I-29 

message: I see that this article is being cleaned up a lot, but if I could make a suggestion.  The state-by-state sections are a little slim.  I suggest doing something like was done on Interstate 95.  There aren't as many states, but it would create larger sections.  Also, integrating the notes and news into the sections would add more "beef" to them, if you will, and create a better-flowing article, IMO.  --MPD T / C 19:26, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning up 

message: I just deleted all the state projects.  There is an Interstate 94 in (statename) that they are already members.  The main article shouldn't fall under their scopes as the other interstates don't due that.  -- KelleyCook 16:56, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: State WikiProjects

message: I think this statement is confusing and I know I'm picking nits here, but I think accuracy is important:
Interstate 94 is the only purely east–west interstate to form a direct connection into a foreign country (Canada). No such interstate currently ends at the U.S.-Mexico border, although I-905 in California will become such when upgrades are completed.
I-905 may be mostly east-west, but because its in the category of a bypass, its not quite the same as a one or two digit east-west road that ends in an even number.  Its really just the word purely that I have a problem with. If you're going to say purely, then you should take out the I-905 exception, otherwise you should probably change purely to mostly or something else.  And if you change purely to mostly, then you have to reconsider roads like I-190 in Buffalo and even I-95, which obviously is north south, but several portions are more east-west than north-south. -- Suso (talk) 12:19, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I-905 and purely east-west interstates 

message: I find:
"mile markers 0.0-15.5 are also posted with I-80, mile markers 15.6-19.0 are posted as I-94 alone"
OK, I-80 and I-94 eastbound are the same road when they enter Indiana from Illionis, and milepost 15.5 is about where I-80 leaves I-94 to enter the eastbound Indiana Toll Road.  But what is the meaning of the "19.0" mile marker remark here?  It seems to me that the road would have I-94 by itself on the mile markers all the way to the Michigan border, which is much beyond the 19.0 mile mark.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.94.52.3 (talk) 21:07, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  comment about mileposts in Indiana 

message: Unfortunately, the template to this table places it at an awkward position.  The template needs to be tweaked a little bit. KyuuA4 (Talk:キュウ) 09:59, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lengths table 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Interstate 94. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121009190842/http://highwayexplorer.com/il_EndsPage.php?id=3094§ion=1 to http://highwayexplorer.com/il_EndsPage.php?id=3094§ion=1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140313002957/http://www.highwayexplorer.com/EndsPage.php?id=3094§ion=1 to http://highwayexplorer.com/EndsPage.php?id=3094§ion=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:41, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified