lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Freudian slip

message: The "Evidence" section of the article is significantly less worked on than "Alternative explanations." I suggest adding more information to "Evidence." In addition to that, I believe talking about the development of the Freudian slip going back to the individual who misquoted a Latin phrase from "The Aeneid" would be beneficial to the article. This seems like relevant information. --Fermentedtoes (talk) 04:21, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future suggestions
Talk:Christ Church, Oxford

message: I linked these names. The latter is fine, but the first goes to a long disambiguation list. I need help to identify the correct John Ball. But then perhaps neither of them should be specifically mentioned in the article. --Bduke (talk) 21:41, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Bduke, a search for "John Bell" "Student of Christ Church" gives :John Bell (physician), so I have updated the article.  TSventon (talk) 21:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. That fixes the issue.--Bduke (talk) 08:06, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

text: User:NeferNefer3, please can you add references when you add content to Wikipedia articles, otherwise it may be removed. I have added a link to a tutorial to your talk page, which includes referencing. TSventon (talk) 22:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sir John Bell and Sir Tim Berners-Lee 
Talk:Zeal (web)

message: how does it differ from dmoz.org? Helix84 00:01, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes for deletion

message: Zealots and other visitors on and after 21 March 2006 were presented with the following message, added to all six community messageboards by a previously unknown "editor" who had apparently been "created" to write those six messages:
*Zeal to shut down on March 28
**Dear Valued Zealots and Contributors, 
**Thank you for being a part of the Zeal community and contributing your time and knowledge to the Directory. After trying to put the deserved resources behind Zeal, we have made the conscious decision to shut down Zeal.com. On March 28, 2006 Zeal will no longer be available. We are not selling Zeal.com and have no future plans for it at this time. 
**We think that avid Zeal users will appreciate the large, interesting and vital community at Furl.net (www.furl.net). Furl is an online book marking service that helps you save information that’s important to you, share it with others and see what others are saving and find important. 
**With Furl you can: 
***Save Web pages to a personal, permanent archive with 5GB of storage 
***Revisit the full text of your favorite Web pages 
***Share articles and information with friends and family members with simple email pass-along tools 
***Use Furl as a platform for social networking and discovering useful information 
***Share articles and information with people that share common interests using RSS feeds 
***See what other Furl members are saving and sharing 
***Save your favorite Zeal content 
**Whether you are browsing the Web, travel planning, recipe sharing, house hunting or researching, Furl is a wonderful tool. Join the thousands of people that are using Furl every day to find, save and share information that is important to them. 
**>>Go to Furl.net now 
Some of us took up the offer and stored our favourite categories and/or list of contributed profiles.
Now this page can serve as a reunion point for sad ex-contributors.
Robin Patterson 22:22, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Closing, March 2006
Talk:SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1)

message: this model no predicts monopoles...
Just curious: should that be now or not? Great article, by the way.
—Herbee 13:40, 2004 Feb 24 (UTC)
This is a terrible name for an article. I'd move it to a different name, but the article text is completely impenetrable to me... Surely there is a better name for this. -- Wapcaplet 01:13, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd have renamed it SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1) by now, but software changes in June make it impossible for such symbols to appear in article titles.  (Of course, I realize that's not what Wapcaplet had in mind.) Michael Hardy 19:26, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)

text: Physicists, or at least those I know call it 3-2-1 but that's an even worse name for the article, isn't it? Phys 06:06, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Four Treasures of the Tuatha Dé Danann

message: Very like the four suits of the Minor Arcana (duck and cover) Wetman 15:20, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The article gives the following association between treasures and cities:
* From Falias was brought the Stone of Fal
* From Gorias was brought the Spear of Destiny (Spear Luin)
* From Findias was brought the sword of Nuada (Claíomh Solais)
* From Murias was brought The Dagda’s Cauldron, the Coire Anseasc ("Undry Cauldron").
However, The History Of Ireland  gives a different association:
:Four gifts with them (brought) from afar,
:By the nobles of the Tuatha Dé Danann:—
:A sword, a stone, a shapely cadron,
:A spear for facing tall champions.
:Lia Fáil from Fálias hither,
:Which used to roar under the king of Ireland;
:The sword of the hand of Lúgh the active,
:From Gorias-choicest of great store.
:From Finias far over the sea,
:Was brought the spear of Lúgh who was not weak;
:From Murias—great prodigious gift—
:The caldron of the Daghdha of Iofty deeds.
In other words, the sword and spear are exchanged. As the article is currently unsourced, I will amend it next week unless someone finds a reliable source supporting the article's current associations. --Safalra 19:34, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong association? 

message: No such confirmation has been made, this is wild speculation on the part of fans.
Remove the reference or reword to show the speculative nature of the comment (I can't as I'm having trouble logging in) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.203.55.109 (talk) 21:55, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harry Potter Reference 

message: Both this page and the Lia Fáil page make this claim, but I can't find any other source that corroborates. It does not appear, that I have found, in the only given source. Is this a recent addition to the stone's repertoire? One-dimensional Tangent (Talk) 02:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: agreed. i've removed it. if someone has a source for it, they can put it back in (but i doubt that such a source exists). Whateley23 09:51, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Said to hold Ireland above the waves."
Talk:Dynamic translation

message: Dynamic translation and Just-in-time compilation are NOT the same thing. The latter involves optimizations that are not always done by the former.
Thus maybe a bit of change on this page would be nice...
----
Dynamic translation and JIT compilation are one and the same. Usually the former is used for actual machine code (e.g. x86 instructions) and the latter for bytecode -- nowadays mostly Java bytecode. Both benefit from:
* Caching of translated code snippets, as opposed to re-interpreting the code each time it is run.
* Performing standard optimizations on the trasnlated code.
* Observing the program's dynamic (run-time) behavior and modifying the optimizations accordingly.
Only the first of the three is mandatory. The other two can be seen on both dynamic translators and JIT compilers.
Yaronf 22:28, Feb 24, 2004 (UTC)
----
This page is redundant with just-in-time. Can they be merged? --FOo 04:01, 4 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yin and yang

message: I've removed a link that seems to be plain old advertising: I saw a bit of content on the linked site that seemed generally informational (though I can't speak to its real relevance to this page or to the subject of qigong), but it all seemed to be leading you toward signing up for some workshops and/or buying some products. (Any site whose front page has "before" and "after" pictures . . .)
From what I've seen of Wikipedia and read on the help pages, I get the pretty clear impression that this is not the sort of thing that should be here. Apologies if I'm dead wrong.Iralith 22:15, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Qinway Qigong link 

message: Is this the best way of expressing this? Yes, there are two elements but Yin-Yang sees them as a harmonious whole rather than two. The point seems to be to learn how to leave the dualistic view behind.
--24.87.154.112 (talk) 01:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dualism? 

message: The symbol used as of today is incorrect. The proper Yin Yang symbol contains a dot of black in the white section and a dot of black in the white section.  It represents that each side also contains the opposite of itself (non-duality) -  this is a vital aspect of Yin and Yang.  I have no idea how to change the photo, but it’s important that it be corrected. Sareyberry (talk) 04:40, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've restored the original image. No upload required, it was already in commons. Checking the edit history though, it looks like people have been vandalizing the logo for years. 2606:6000:4FC0:11:45F1:5DCF:DDA4:B02B (talk) 06:36, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with symbol 

message: Yin and Yang symbol is a "flat" repesentation of a continuous flow ou change, maybe better described by the Klein bottle? 2804:7F0:BA00:EC29:1ECC:D6FF:FEBA:4F02 (talk) 15:17, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless reliable sources have likened the symbol to a Klein bottle, it won't be described as such in the article. See WP:OR. Largoplazo (talk) 15:29, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  connection with Klein Bottle 

message: It seems self-evident that the symbol visualizes the “steady“ lunar cycle, i.e. new moon, waxing moon, full moon, waning moon. I am surprised this is not stated. 2A01:C22:B525:C800:5081:1221:7CF7:79C1 (talk) 07:28, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia reports on facts published in reliable sources, so we would need reliable sources that discuss this before mentioning it in the article. Largoplazo (talk) 11:35, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be hard work. But I would refer to the new simplified Chinese characters of Yin and Yang. These show the symbols for the moon and the sun, respectively, together with a radical that I do not immediately recognize. 2A02:3100:303C:AE00:18A6:31CC:2B95:16E3 (talk) 10:45, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Just checked. The radical means hill, or mound. A good spot to observe the sky, but it is probably a coincidence. 2A02:3100:303C:AE00:18A6:31CC:2B95:16E3 (talk) 10:52, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Astronomical origin?
Talk:Paubrasilia

message: Latin name?
What is the Latin classification for brazilwood? Is it Caesalpinia echinata or Caesalpinia brasiliensis? --Romanm 16:08, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Only Caesalpinia echinata, but you will find Caesalpinia brasiliensis through much of the literature. Brya 18:18, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

message: Someone should elaborate on the actual tree that produces this wood...I can't find an article on the specific tree...Antimatter 07:02, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The tree is brazilwood. Macgreco 04:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Description has been added as part of a collaboration project with ARKive. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:48, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brazilwood tree? 

message: Is seems that this tree, as least in the US is called Brazilwood or Pau-Brasil in Brazil (I think). Based this article (this is only a link to synopsis) https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2016-10/pp-ans101316.php it seems that Paubrasilia echinata is the only species in the genus Paubrasilia. Maybe this page should be called Paubrasilia echinata? or just Brazilwood? At first glance, to me, it seems just using the generic name implies with is a page on the genus, which it is not.
I will look into other entries and see what is commonly done, or if I am missing other pages on this tree. Given that the tree is listed as endangered (at least based on this page), it would be nice so have some more information on it.
Waughd (talk) 01:18, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Lectonar (talk) 11:36, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I just realized the Brazilwood link I gave goes to the Paubrasilia page, the Brazilwood article I was looking at was on the "simple Wikipedia". It does seem this page would be best called Paubrasilia echinata as this article is about the species of tree, not the genus. Brazilwood should link to it, which is seems to already do. There already is a section the notes the term Brazilwood as at times been applied to other species, which as probably lead to some confusion in both historical and modern text. Clearly none of this is helped by the recent taxonomic revision of the genus. Waughd (talk) 12:43, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of page 

message: When I used the search term Pernambuco, having in mind the material used for violin bows, it didn’t turn up. I eventually found this article about Paubrasilia. In fact, my search for Pernambuco had turned up Paubrasilia but I didn’t recognise it since it said nothing about bows. Could someone with the experience to do so please change whatever is needed to make  Pernambuco produce “bows for stringed instruments” in a search. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 04:40, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pernambuco wood for bows
Talk:M1918 Browning Automatic Rifle

message: A document detailing the Braschaat demonstrations makes note of a B.A.R (converted to run 7mm) being tested alongside a Bren Light Machine Gun of what appears to be the same conversion. I would appreciate a second set of eyes to confirm or deny my suspicions that this is indeed a .280 British conversion of the Browning Automatic Rifle being referenced rather than 7mm Mauser.
An excerpt from the document:
Firing with Light Machine Guns Converted to 7mm:
"A Browning Automatic Rifle (FN model) and a British Bren Light Machine Gun converted to 7mm both fired satisfactorily. . ."
General Comments on Demonstration:
"The object of this demonstration. . . was in reality to introduce and advertise Fabrique Nationale d'Armes de Guerre's 7mm lightweight automatic rifle. Further, it was designed to correct the erroneous impression created by the UK demonstration of August 10th that the new UK's 7mm (.28 cal) small arms ammunition was completely of UK origin and design."
Given one aim of this trial was dispelling notions that the .280/7mm(*) round was entirely British development, I came to wonder if '7mm B.A.R' might actually be referencing a .280 variant, instead of say 7mm Mauser. It would make some sense considering the rifle placed against it for demonstration (the Bren gun) is well known in some circles to have been chambered in .280 British for trials purposes. 
The only other round that 7mm is referencing in my mind is 7mm Mauser which is brought up a couple of times in the document regarding ballistics design of the .280 British.
I am not aware of a 7mm Mauser conversion of the Bren gun but I am of the .280 British conversions. Therefore adding to my suspicion that the two mentioned competing rifles were both chambered in .280 British.
It may be poor grammatical interpretation on my part but, given the heavily .280-centric nature of the demonstrations and a few other ancillary elements to it which exist in the document, it doesn't seem farfetched to interpret the .280 British conversion.
Unfortunately, my certainty of this possibility is rather limited. So, I am hoping someone may be able to cast eyes over it. 
I would also love to share the wider document yet, I cannot find a web link to it. So, I will have to find means to upload my copy.
(*) - The document appears to interchange the use of the terms '.280' and '7mm' regarding .280 British. Meanwhile it also exhibits use of the term '7mm' in other places without specifying reference to .280 British. Therefore leading to some of my uncertainty. Engliſh Antics (talk) 12:19, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible .280 variant of the BAR
Talk:Grey Tuesday

message: Can EMI's attempt to protect their copyright really be described as 'censorship'?  Morwen 16:45, Feb 24, 2004 (UTC)
Very simply, this page is not NPOV. Optim 16:48, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: EMI would claim they are not censoring, merely protecting their rights.  Wikipedia does not take sides.  I've changed the phrasing accordingly. Morwen 18:10, Feb 24, 2004 (UTC)
I did some NPOVing of the article, hopefully it's ready to remove the disputed neutrality message. --Lexor|Talk 16:03, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Justine Henin Hardenne

message: The images have been removed as possible copyright infringement.
This image is a possible copyright infringement and should therefore not be used by any article. <explain reason for suspicion here> 
This image is now listed on Wikipedia:Possible copyright infringements. To the poster: If there was permission to use this image under terms of our license or if you are its copyright holder, then please indicate so here (click Edit this page in the sidebar) - see our image use policy for tips on this. NOTE: deletion will occur about one week from the time this page title was placed on the Votes for deletion page. 
It also should be noted that the posting of copyrighted material that does not have the express permission from the copyright holder is possibly in violation of applicable law and of our policy. Those with a history of violations may be temporarily suspended from editing pages. If this is in fact an infringement of copyright, we still welcome any original contributions by you. 
If you believe that this image may be used by Wikipedia and by all sublicensees under the fair use doctrine, then please add a detailed fair use rationale as described on wikipedia:image description page to justify this belief. 
Thanks, Texture 17:56, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/archive1

message: I have decided to be bold.
Can I suggest a one-month cutoff for unseconded and disputed candidates?
I am about to post to Wikipedia:village pump asking for seconders.
Bmills 15:52, 8 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaning up [[Wikipedia:Brilliant prose candidates]]

message: Digital Millennium Copyright Act was added on 3 March 2003 and has since been extensively reworked, with a portion removed from it and substantially expanded now residing at Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act (OCILLA). OCILLA tries a very tough job - to explain a complicated law and how to follow it in a way which normal people can understand. If it succeeds in that and as an article, it's a candidate for legal Brilliant Prose (as the primary author of the current revision, I'm not neutral). Jamesday 02:47, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Review needed for

message: I think we should add a boilerplete text in the talk page of the nominees. It should go like...
:This article has been nominated on Wikipedia:Brilliant prose candidates. Please refer to that page if you wish to second or contest the nomination.
The purpose is encorage discussion and let know that the article was nominated. Thoughts? Muriel Victoria 10:27, 16 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I like the idea too. Bmills - this is this main problem with BP at the moment - if someone is qualified to say "yes this article is very good/complete/etc" then they are very likely to have contributed already to the article because it is something they are interested in. No simple remedy to this is available.. though Eloquence and I muse on bringing in external "verifiers" at Wikipedia_talk:Brilliant prose. Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 10:37, 16 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Boilerplate

message: As I understand it from the "Brilliant prose voting" section, the old entries that didn't get unanimous approval are now in "Candidates from voting" for a second consideration. Any that don't get objections in a week will stay in Brilliant Prose. Objections will be detailed, not just a Keep/Delete vote, so that the pieces can be worked on just like new Brilliant Prose candidates that have been objected to.
Is this right?
This early in the process, there seem to be very few votes listed, but they seem to be simple Keep/Delete votes. Am I misreading something? Dandrake 01:45, Jan 20, 2004 (UTC)
This is right. I intend to come back early next week to a: remove all articles with no objections from this page and b: remove all articles with objections from Wikipedia:Featured articles (formerly Brilliant prose). Objections should give some reason. Bmills 11:12, 21 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry.  I was just moving articles around and saw one in the with objections area that had the objection withdrawn.  I wasn't paying attention to which class of nomination is was. Gentgeen 09:57, 6 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. The sooner the month is up and the page returns to a better size, the better. Bmills 10:28, 6 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refreshing: The final round
Talk:American Brahman

message: If the Brahman is a US cow that was created by crossbreading an indian and a european cow, how can it be a sacred cow of hinduism, when most hindus live in India? Perl 19:14, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The Brahman is Bos indicus, which is from Asia. It has been carried to many other places in the world. It has also been crossbred with European cattle, in which case it is a hybrid.Pollinator 22:47, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Well, my e-mail is daltonagre@uol.com.br .I must tell that the information claiming Brahman is widely used in Brazil is false.I know all zebu races available in Brazil.And I never saw a Brahman, except on magazines, computer and TV.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.9.2.143 (talk) 18:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A brazilian agronomist never saw a Brahman

message: I have heard that Brahman can jump over fences! Can anyone verify this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.207.35.245 (talk) 05:52, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jumping Brahman 

message: - Could info please be added re whether there are different breeds within the category "Brahman"?
- Also, could info on the breed registies and breed registry association please be added to the main body of the text (not just in external links)?
Thanks -- 201.17.36.246 (talk) 15:14, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Breeds and breed registries

message: I won't pass judgment on the content of this article, but its style seems quite amateurish in very many places and, indeed, overall. One gets the impression that it was written by a non-native English speaker, in which case I would gladly give it an "A" for effort.  Toddcs (talk) 22:01, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style? 

message: This section had been blanked and replaced with graffiti which has now been removed:
I would restore it, but it needs references and the second and third paragraphs possibly need rewriting to be less promotional. Peter James (talk) 17:39, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted section 