lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:UC Santa Barbara Events Center

message: I removed the last part of this section that said
: A unique aspect of The Thunderdome is that there is no press table along the sideline in front of the student section.  Thus, there is nothing between the front row of seats and the basketball court itself, which can create a very intimidating atmosphere as the students are very close to the court.
This is no longer true. While the students are just as close as they used to be, there is and has been a press table there for several years.  - Anxiety35 (talk • contribs) 22:28, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transformation into The Thunderdome Edit
Talk:French ship Achille

message: I have just reverted the edit by an anonymous editor; I understand that it might seem a little bit strange to list three ships right after announcing two, and that the older ship should come lst, but the point is that the page talks about French ship Achille; the Annibal was never commissioned in the French Navy as the Achille, so it can't really be said to be a full "French ship Achille". I just listed her here so that people could make the link from the English ship Achille if they just know that she was captured from the French. Rama 07:42, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three or two
Talk:Bats (musical)

message: I saw that show when that school in Dunedin put it on. The best bit of the night I went is when one of the tourists photographed our side of the hall in the second half. 218.101.117.227 07:42, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I acted in it. I was one of the bank tellers in the second scene, and I was a tourist in the second half. Scott Gall 07:45, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If it was near the end of June, I was holidaying in New Zealand at the time, but if I'd known it was on, I would've seen it. User:NazismIsntCool 07:48, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

text: I acted in it aswell. I played Mr Dracula. Awesome character! 121.72.236.247 (talk) 07:48, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Old comments

message: PROD concern stated as "No notable sources, original authors have been blocked for over 10 years, seems unlikely that the quality of this article will ever improve enough to become notable."
It may be that this musical is not notable in itself, but an alternative to deleting it could be merging some of the information into the Ian Dorricott article. There is certainly evidence in digitised newspapers that the musical was frequently produced by school groups. Whether there is enough coverage to show that it's notable, I don't yet know, but that can be researched. RebeccaGreen (talk) 14:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROD removal
Talk:Syndicate (series)

message: How can Syndicate Wars use an isometric projection if it uses a true 3D-engine?
:The default camera views are isometric --larsinio 17:12, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, when classifying computer game graphics, the term 'isometric' isn't used as strictly as in geometry. The original Syndicate is a fairly typical example of 'isometric' graphics, even though the Z axis is scaled by 1/2 (IIRC). 86.59.11.23 (talk) 14:16, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isometric Projection? 

message: I think we should use present tense instead of past tense. Most of the article should be writen in present tense with past tense used only where it is really needed. See: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Tenses--analoguedragon 14:25, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I'll fix this. Rbarreira 19:14, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past tense? 

message: We need to create and lengthen the articles for the individual pages; I started with Syndicate Wars already, but it needs a lot more detail --larsinio
:Agreed. That's why I reformatted the series overview article. Does anyone have any good sources for information on American Revolt? Jacoplane 17:39, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I did some quick googling and found this page which has screenshots and lengthy description --larsinio 18:15, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Split and make new articles

message: Hi all.
Does anyone know of a good source for the concept art Mike Man released of Bullfrog's PS2 Syndicate project?
Looks like the Kotaku article () is now gone, and the only remaining source I see is the Syndicate Wiki (), which wouldn't really be acceptable for a citation. It'd be great to get these pieces reachable from within the article.
IAmTheNeil (talk) 14:29, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for PS2 Game Concept Art
Talk:Lists of Catholics

message: Hm...I got a proposal. Since it's impossible to put the majority of Catholics in any field on any list, and since the obscurity of the subject tends to make a list hilariously nonsensical (for instance- Joseph Conrad and some aspiring English writer, on the same list- this is a joke), I'd suggest to break the list into more paragraphs. Or, if the list would pretend to be more detailed- then, a few more pages should be created (the Renaissance music (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Renaissance_composers) is 90% Catholic, and to put all these people, plus Baroque, Romantic etc. composers-Catholics on a single page –this is virtually impossible). Also, I propose to retain the «fun nature» of this, because the enormity of the subject would make the list absurd. So- maybe a few different pages for writers, scientists, musicians,.., but to keep the list within some rational limits. Mir Harven 09:45, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As I see it, the definition is simple. Catholics are people who:
*are baptized as such
*may have given up their faith-but have not embraced any other (Buddhism, Judaism, Islam,..)
*converts from other faiths
So, Catholics are people once baptized in the Catholic Church who have not explicitely "crossed over" into some other faith. They may have become atheists or indifferent, but- this doesnt matter.
Mir Harven 18:11, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: A modest proposal

message: Let me repeat. Catholics are people:
*who were baptized & stayed within RCC (say, Gregory Peck)
*who converted (say, Graham Greene)
*who converted on death-bed (say, Buffalo Bill)
*who were baptized, but eventually became atheists, agnostics or simply indifferent (say, James Joyce)
Catholics are not:
*people converted from Catholicism to some other faith (say, John Travolta)
*people who converted once, but eventually either «returned» to their original faith or adopted some other (say, Ben Jonson) Mir Harven 18:44, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Who qualifies ?

message: This page was recently nominated for deletion and kept through default of no consensus being reached.  The archived discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of Roman Catholics -- Francs2000 | Talk  02:28, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  VfD nomination 

message: I know this small part is essentially insignificant- but I kinda like Buffalo Bill and Black Elk and comp. But, farnkly: I got no idea of a new list that would contain them. Adventurers ? Along with Cortez and similar persons ? Hmm...Maybe Chief Joseph should go to military leaders ? Be as it may, he's got more in common with, say, generals and field marshalls than with alcoholic murderers like Wild Bill Longley. Then, what with W.T. Sherman and other military figures who had not been "leaders" like Napoleon and Charlemagne ? Mir Harven 17:44, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old West etc. 

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 04:33, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate
Talk:Leeds Beckett University

message: Does not demonstrate notability through third party sources Aloneinthewild (talk) 22:52, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Support merge - Agreed. Far better to be included in the LBU page. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 14:57, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 12:47, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Leeds Law School]] 

message: Why did it try to change its name to Carnegie, and why is the name used for eg sporting purposes? DuncanHill (talk) 21:02, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Carnegie? 

message: I have added the names of several significant artists who are recognized alumni of the University.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.143.113.172 (talk) 10:36, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alumni
Talk:Royal Victorian Chain

message: I was wondering if e.g. the Kings of Nepal received the Chain or the King of Jordan, Sultan of Oman, ruler of Brunei etc.?  If so, then one might see a pattern.  What do you think? :-)
: A pattern? I think it is safe to say that the heads of state who have some kind of a special relationship with the UK and/or the British Sovereign receive the Chain. Kings Mahendra and Birendra of Nepal (the Gurkhas etc.) were awarded the Chain and became honorary British Field Marshals. King Hussein of Jordan received the Royal Victorian Chain, too... Unfortunately I cannot find the comprehensive list of all the recipients of the Chain. Mapple 14:40, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  continuing ... 

message: In the picture of George V, I count no fewer than 17 awards being worn. Is it possible to have a picture of the award (for instance, the picture on medals.org.uk)? 12.96.87.102 (talk) 16:49, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: At the bottom, in Orders and Honours of the UK, in the other Other Honours section, you have hereditary knighthood.  I thought the only hereditary knighthood was a baronetcy.  So what is this other one, and why would it be ranked lower than a bog-standard knight bachelor? Indeed here it says that a Bart is the only hereditary honour that's not a peerage, which is what I thought. Where there any hereditary knighthoods that aren't baronetcies?  Are any extant? If not, it shouldn't be in the list. And if there are, why would they rank lower than a knight bachelor? Please advise. Ganpati23 (talk) 21:19, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It would appear as though you are correct, but the proper place to talk about that would be the talk page for that template. Achowat (talk) 21:43, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hereditary knighthood ranked after baronet and knight bachelor doesn't exist 

message: You started an RfC on this matter and it has not reached its conclusion. ₪ MIESIANIACAL 05:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's good you agree that this page is covered by that RFC. Though, I think you've linked to the wrong change. GoodDay (talk) 05:33, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: We have known that the chain was worn by the King 
REF:
https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=900070198344067&set=pcb.900070278344059
However no legal letters nor announcements were there. But soon we will see him wearing that again.We have to place him on the list. Him9 (talk) 15:29, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The king is the sovereign of every UK order including the Royal Victorian Chain, a position he inherited the moment he became the king. He didn’t award it to himself, he’s the head of it and therefore can wear it at anytime, likewise the Royal Victorian Order. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 15:32, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: RVC is an order? 218.102.117.127 (talk) 15:50, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  is king charles granting himself the chain?
Talk:AMA

message: Should we really have the mention of the Association of Members' Advocates in the article space?  --Merovingian (t) (c) 09:18, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
:Why not? (I don't know; I'm just asking.)
:Atlant 12:24, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

message: If you search for "ama," in lowercase, it does not take you here.
AMA can also stand for Asset Management Account.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.49.97.44 (talk) 20:56, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''ama'' should redirect here 

message: I'd have to say don't merge. Ama contains articles and names that contain the exact word Ama. Due to limitations of the wiki software, you can't redirect all lowercase "ama" to this page. I've put a notice at the top of the other disambiguation page. —Malber (talk • contribs • game) 14:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge Merging such disambiguation pages is very commonly done, see, say, AMB, to pick one at random.—Ketil Trout 01:39, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is different; Ama is a name in itself. AMB only lists abbreviations and acronyms. —Malber (talk • contribs • game) 22:05, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dont merge
Talk:Isozyme

message: I have a question concerning the term isozym. 
I would like to compare two enzymes which use the same substrate and produce the identical product. The two enzymes however use different cofactors. In one case the "cofactor" is molecular Oxygen and NADP+ and in the other case the enzyme uses H2O and electrons are transferred somehow into the membrane of the bacterium. 
Is it feasible to talk of isozymes ?
Answer
Yah why not, since they use the same substrate and produce the same product/function.It does make sense because mutation or insertion deletion might have occured resulting the enzymes to have different binding cofactor sites of which still generating the formation of the same product or function (transportation of the electron).152.106.240.139 10:32, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've fixed the redirect now. There's a tiny bit of informtion there but it needs a lot of work. This isn't my particular area so I won't really be able to help a great deal but it's a start. Medos  (talk • contribs) 12:23, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've added this to the allozyme talk page, may help here too? I believe this is the first mention of the term allozyme: "We propose the term allozyme for the variant proteins produced by allelic forms of the same locus, to avoid the now common confusion with isozymes which are the various polymers produced from monomers specified by different loci." from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1212247/pdf/841.pdf Prakash, Satya, R. C. Lewontin, and J. Lo Hubby. "A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations IV. Patterns of genic variation in central, marginal and isolated populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura." Genetics 61, no. 4 (1969): 841. 
91.67.141.25 (talk) 14:32, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gulfview Heights, South Australia

message: This page is full of bias and sounds like (is) an ad. This would be part of this areas council to re-imagine this area as affluent and 'new', which is just not the case. It is a lower middle class suburb.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.122.230 (talk) 21:06, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Apart from the subjective "relatively affluent" comment, I'm not sure what you could be referring to. Feel free to change the wording to something more neutral and verifiable.--Yeti Hunter (talk) 00:00, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Princess Marie Louise of Schleswig-Holstein

message: Is it true that E.V. Lucas had a romantic relationship with Princess Marie-Louise?   He is mentioned in her memoirs and the article on Princess Marie-Louise says that she had a relationship with an unnamed person.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.36.125.143 (talk) 21:20, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  E.V. Lucas 

message: Her godparents were The Emperor of Austria and The Queen of Hanover.
The Emperor of Austria? Is there a source for this? Komitsuki (talk) 06:07, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Godfather issue
Talk:Marion, South Australia

message: Much of what is in this suburb article needs to be transferred to the City of Marion article! The article itself refers to attractions that do not actually exist in the suburb of Marion, but the city of Marion. - Michaelgabrielsen 01:47, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I removed the ref-required tag as I have fixed the highlight citation, but I'd like to add more references elsewhere in the article. I'll leave it off for the moment, but the article still needs additional work, which I'll tackle if no-one else does. Bilby (talk) 13:06, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referencing
Talk:Tempest 2000

message: I will join them together.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.99.49.6 (talk) 03:25, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  There are 2 reception sections. 

message: While Wikipedia Links Typhoon 2001 and Tsunami 2010 to Tempest 3000, the authors link the games (both by name and technically) to Tempest 2000.
Yura87 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 17:57, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unofficial versions
Talk:North Adelaide

message: "Also on Tynte Street are the studios of Adelaide's NWS-9, the local Nine Network affiliate. Also on this grid are the studios of the local Network Ten affiliate, ADS-10."
The latter half of this statement is no longer true as Channel 10 moved from their location in 2008, possibly 2007 and the site has been bulldozed with the exception of the heritage-listed building. Can this please be clarified. Ta Sem boy (talk) 00:49, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ADS-10 (Channel 10) 
Talk:Norwood, South Australia

message: I've added some information and references. Enough to remove the warning notice? Will do after a week if nobody objects. Shortshadow (talk) 04:02, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

message: Norwood Library redirects to this page. I'm noting that there was a Carnegie library by the same name, see List of Carnegie libraries in Canada. I figured I should mention this here in case anyone is interested in digging further. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 20:15, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:People's Action Party

message: The Leadership transition in the People's Action Party page was created in 2012 and largely forgotten about over the intervening years since. The original editor has now been blocked for sockpuppetery, but the contents written are still relevant and written by the original account. I propose a merge into the PAP's main page; more information can also be expanded upon for the transition from GCT to LHL and the failed succession plan to HSK. Seloloving (talk) 05:51, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge as the leadership transition article is too short (and has insufficient notability) to be its own independent article, but I believe such information still warrants a mention in the main PAP article.R22-3877 (talk) 13:55, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

text: Merge Not sure why there's even a separate article in the first place — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.56.91.222 (talk) 18 May 2021 (UTC)
* Merge per nom. Though some of the statistics (example Election results) can be split out from the article to make it less table heavy.  I believe you can do the merge whenever you are ready. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 04:26, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yep, I will do it when I have the time. The LKY-GCT transition is more complex than originally thought, according to Men in White, and I plan to pursue that together with the LKY article revamp, unless someone beats me to it. Seloloving (talk) 06:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: It is an authoritarian party and from the state there is a tendency towards indoctrination. To say that it is only because of the economy, that people vote for them is nonsense. Marcos96a (talk) 17:08, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. It seems totally inappropriate to barely even hint at what political scientists recognise to be Singapore’s significant lack of democracy in many areas. There should certainly be a reference in the introductory paragraph to Singapore’s quasi-authoritarian system of government. Anybody reading the intro would assume the PAP is analogous to a typical democratic political party, which is an absurd suggestion given Singapore’s system o government. 150.203.2.220 (talk) 12:04, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Democracy
Talk:Prospect, South Australia

message: * Very poor article mainly concerned with real estate prices
* Prospect continues north of Regency Rd to Livingstone Av
* $550k for a 3br house is NOT affordable
* There are heaps of "apartments" in Prospect
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.240.218.82 (talk • contribs) 16:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems (2007)
Talk:Patellar tendinitis

message: This article has been suspended due to possible copyright issues. I do have the copyright authorization to post this article. Please advise on how to re-post this article.
: See the copyright notice.  Quote: If you hold the copyright to this material, or if you have permission to use this material under the terms of our license, please indicate so on this page's talk page and under the article's listing on Wikipedia:Copyright problems.  The notice has the necessary links.  if it give you too much trouble leave me a message on User talk: Bubbachuck and I'll help you out. -- Bubbachuck 05:34, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Great!  i copied the page to the temporary page mentioned in the copyright notice.  hopefully in a week the issue will be fixed.  once the copyright issue is dealt with, i will suggest moving the page to "patellar tendinitis" (the scientific name), with a redirect from "jumper's knee" to it.  -- Bubbachuck 04:26, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I am following up the claim of permission and hope to reinstate the page shortly. --Ngb ?!? 08:22, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Confirmation now received. --Ngb ?!? 09:12, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Lifted from site

message: The picture of the knee is not in English. TheThomas (talk) 23:08, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The picture is not in English
Talk:Nova Scotia Liberal Party

message: I think we may need to reassess where we place the current NS Liberals. While they're definitely fiscal centrists, and while they're further to the right than I would personally like, I think the article's current description of "Center-Right" is incorrect. At most they're centrist, and more accurately they're fiscally Center and socially Center-Left. 
There are other articles for provincial political parties across the country that give both a Social and Economic placing. I think that would be a good idea for this party. It would be more accurate in my opinion.
Also, the only source for the current "Center-Right" description is a broken link. 
47.54.63.42 (talk) 05:25, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: You may very well be correct, but this is not something we can decide ourselves. We need a reliable source that cites their position. --Yamla (talk) 11:23, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Party Alignment

message: The party's founding date is listed as 1883 but its listed first leader took that position in 1840. It's mentioned that the party descended from the Anti-Confederation Party - what about the Liberal Party that existed prior to the Confederation debate in the colony of Nova Scotia? Articles that discuss the Liberal Party of that era, e.g. James Boyle Uniacke link here.
Apex Editor (talk) 03:49, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founding 

message: The Party's official name per their own bylaws is The Liberal Association of Nova Scotia, although they're registered with Elections NS to use the name "Nova Scotia Liberal Party" and usually use this in campaigns. While I've added the other name to the article intro, should the title reflect the party's legal name or the more commonly used one? PerplexedPanda (talk) 18:50, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of party in article title