lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tom, Dick, and Harry (2006 film)

message: I redirected to this page because I felt it was the natural title people would be looking for, but correct me if I'm wrong.  —  Rickyrab | Talk 02:23, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:We Were Soldiers Once… and Young

message: Thi article is 99% about the film. Film content should be moved to that page. The content on this page would make a nice 'Controversy' section, which is what is missing from the film entry.
202.82.171.186 (talk) 02:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Film Stuff should be Moved to Film entry

message: I added a See Also section, and referenced the authors, Lz x-ray, and Mel Gibson, as he played one of the authors in the film adaptation. Crockspot 02:23, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: See Also section
Talk:Slizer

message: Are we ready to remove the copy edit warning?-Giant89 02:25, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Warnings

message: Is there anyone who knows more about these and can make the article legible?  204.248.58.83 15:18, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The grammar on the character descriptions is terrible... 

message: A good reference I found is this=  http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Slizers, still does not explain the name of Slizers though.CoolCDST (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 04:01, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is information missing...

message: This article cites as a sole source the Brickipedia article on the same topic, which, in turn, cites only this page as a source. Ashorocetus (talk | contribs) 14:07, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Citogenesis]]
Talk:Chondrostei

message: I think Chondrosteans lived since the Carboniferous. In my opinion Palaeoniscus who lived during the Carboniferous of France was a Chondrostean.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.121.145.92 (talk) 20:14, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Fossil range

message: Quite why this page was linked from, yet redirected back to Actinopterygii may remain a mystery.
However I am no fish expert - I created some text in order to fill the gap - hopefully some expert will come and do more work on it soon. Apologies for any mistakes made.HappyVR 02:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: new page

message: Hi fellows. Please, be so kind and take a look at this proposal to create the :Template:Chondrostei-stub and the corresponding :Category:Chondrostei stubs. Regards, --Fabio Descalzi, aka Fadesga (talk) 21:37, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible new stub and stub category 

message: Ok, what the hell, half of the random sources I find through google say that bichirs are in the subclass Cladistia while the other half say that bichirs are in the subclass Chondrostei. The way I learned it, bichirs are in the subclass Cladistia. The way a cladogram of actinopterygian lineages shows it, bichirs are clearly more basal than the chondrosteans and there is no way that this has anything to do with Chondrostei being a paraphyletic group. Does anyone have any idea what is going on here?
P.S. I've never edited a Wikipedia page before, but this was such a mystery to me that I really had to say something about it. If a more experienced user could somehow direct this someone who could help, that would be great. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.189.4.213 (talk) 01:26, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bichirs (order Polypteriformes) are in the Subclass Cladistia 
Talk:Clean Government Political Assembly

message: A web search on Google shown except Wikipedia, nobody used the names of this group here, namely Clean Government Political Assembly or Komei Political Assembly. The New Komeito website uses Komei Political League, but Google search only gave 2 results. Given the resultant parts are known as Komeito and New Komeito, I wonder if we should move this article to Komei-something. Samuel Curtis 02:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of this entity
Talk:Vern Bullough

message: and CV per this link]. Jokestress 02:40, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date 
Talk:HaShir Shelanu

message: The title should be Hashir Shelanu or HaShir Shelanu. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.83.84.202 (talk • contribs) 18:46, June 29, 2006
:I prefer to call the page: Hashir Shelanu. It isn't better than HaShir Shelanu? 88.153.202.128 12:30, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Chokoloskee, Florida

message: i would lke to learn about the bay not the island so some time can u add about the bay. that would be great! i mean u dont have i can go lok somewere els but i love ur webste. thatnk u for making it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.182.22.132 (talk) 01:06, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: old

message: The WP article :Florida climate has a map placing Chokoloskee in either the "humid subtropical" or "savannah" zone (on the border between the two zones). Whichever climate classification is used, it needs to have a citation to a reliable source. - Donald Albury 14:02, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate 

message: I have famiky there.
Lmk how things are there. 
323-538-2505 (text) 23.242.81.214 (talk) 02:28, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is Chokoloskee doing in hurricane? 

message: Trying to find out what year that they changed the ZIP Code for Chokoloskee Island from 33925 to 34138, I have a postcard with that ZIP Code on it from Parkway Motel Marina I’m trying to find out what year it is the postcard LLChilds (talk) 14:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That is not something that is usually included in Wikipedia articles (I don't recall seeing such information in any article I have edited or read). You may be able to narrow the period in which the zip code was changed by careful on-line searches. For instance, I very quickly found this Florida Zip Code Directory from 1984, in which the zip code for Chokoloskee was 33925. However, we are all volunteers here, and I, for one, have neither the inclination nor the leisure to search for reliable sources on this issue. Good luck in your own search. Donald Albury 15:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you 2600:1006:B0C0:7B9C:99BC:52C7:AF88:1D58 (talk) 17:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ZIP codes
Talk:Buddhist cosmology

message: I am going to contemplate whether the majority of this article should be comported to an archive as an annexure accessed from this talk page and start afresh with citations. It is unfortunate that those who iterated this article with such care have been so careless in the provision of their sources. Probity.
B9 hummingbird hovering (talk • contribs) 17:04, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: I think the article Buddhist cosmolgy of the theravada school should be merged with Buddhist cosmology article as vertical cosmology section in Buddhist cosmology article is exactly same as the mentioned article, except for the format and some extra information, which can be added to this article while merging. Is it a good idea?JaMongKut (talk) 13:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Support Theravada cosmology is not fundamentally different from the cosmology of the other schools. --2600:1700:6CB0:BCA0:E5EF:1DFD:3D25:2F97 (talk) 06:31, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

text: I think there is very little in "Buddhist cosmology of the Teravada school" worth merging to "Buddhist cosmology"; the long quotes are not really helpfull. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:38, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging 

message: Write  formless devas in the article of arupadhatu devas instead of formless beings Joel binu (talk) 10:30, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buddhist cosmology 

message: Sir please remove pp protection from buddhist cosmology Joel binu (talk) 12:51, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Joel bindu. Well, I am not an administrator to remove this protection but you can do edit request on what you want to change. Fade258 (talk) 13:17, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please remove pp protection
Talk:Cheetah (disambiguation)

message: CHEETAH
I was trying to justify listing it in the main section, but without the explanation that the screen name was spelled "Cheetah" for at least one of the Tarzan films, it doesn't belong, and needs to go in a "Common misspellings" or "See also" section. --Usgnus 02:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think the lack or presence of the trailing "h" alters things much either way:  it's just a spelling variation.  In other words, i don't object to "Cheeta" being in the main section, or outside;  as long as it's on the page.  --Piet Delport 14:56, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "The antelope is the fastest of all land animals, and a member of the deer family. It runs with speed (coursing) rather than by stalk-and-ambush." I'm sure that must be wrong, the fact seems wrong and also the wording is not right either. Anybody else sure about this then they can add it back in, but for now I'll remove. Mathmo Talk 22:12, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: True or False?
Talk:Bill Curry

message: Curry was hired by GSU in 2008 and is still employed by them as head FB coach.  Therefore, the article should say "2008-present" instead of "2010-present".  I understand that they won't have a team on the field until then, but he works for them now.  --rogerd (talk) 14:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Georgia State job

message: Curry was the topic of author George Plimpton's third and final pro football book, One More July, about his final training camp and its aftermath.  This deserves to be mentioned in the article. 2600:1004:B1C1:BF57:0:20:40CD:9001 (talk) 18:23, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  One More July
Talk:Harrod–Domar model

message: The description given is the short version. In the long version there's also an expected rate of growth.
E.
--203.214.140.108 02:54, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: short version

message: This is not a Harrod- Domar model. it looks more like a Solow growth model.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aksana C (talk • contribs) 15:26, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Solow growth model

message: I found this:
: 
:\ Y=cK \Rightarrow dlog(Y)=dlog(c)+dlog(K).
: 
I changed it to this:
: 
:\ Y=cK \Rightarrow d\log(Y)=d\log(c)+d\log(K).
: 
Notice (1) the different appearance of the period at the end (this may vary between browsers, but on mine, the problem with the first version is very conspicuous); and (2) the different appearance of "dlog"; that one should be conspicuous on all browsers; the first version is quite incorrect in standard TeX usage.
: 
WP:MOSMATH does exist. Michael Hardy (talk) 10:54, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I removed the periods entirely. They are unnecessary and cause confusion when the dot notation is used for derivatives. I can revert the edit if anyone has a problem with this. KropotkinSchmopotkin (talk) 08:08, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  math notation cleanup
Talk:John Salathé

message: I believe it was John Salathe and AX NELSON (rather than Steck) who made the first ascent of the Lost Arrow via the chimney. The second ascent by this route (if I remember correctly) was made by Harding, Tarver and Swift in 1954. Soon thereafter, Wilts, Wilson and Galwas made the third ascent.
I consider it certain that Allen Steck and John made the first ascent of the north face of Sentinel.Bswiftest@mac.com 23:08, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gay Divorce

message: this article is not what i expected. --24.36.129.59 02:40, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry.... —  MusicMaker 07:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lowered expectations

message: I'm raising this article to Start class, although expansion is, of course, welcome.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:45, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, maybe later...if no one else gets to it. (Oy, always wants MORE :D). JeanColumbia (talk) 17:57, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: The title should be "The Gay Divorcee", about a happy divorced person, NOT the dissolution of a same sex union...99.31.156.42 (talk) 16:36, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Ray Perkins

message: He was born on December 6, 1941 according to sources, the New York Times incorrectly stated his DOB as November 6.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.122.216.158 (talk) 13:47, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth
Talk:Mike Price

message: This article says Price was "making it rain". What does that mean? -- Mikeblas (talk) 03:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=make+it+rain . Spacepotato (talk) 09:51, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "making it rain"? 

message: I'm not finding any other source that indicates he died, UTEPs website has no mention of it. Could this be a mistake?
http://www.utepathletics.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/price_mike00.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.25.187.95 (talk) 05:47, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an honest mistake. A Mike Price associated with college football died, but it was a different Mike Price: the deceased was 14 years younger and a former EMU player. See this article for more information. --NellieBly (talk) 22:07, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mike Price Passed Away? 

message: The redirect Coach Price has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Hey man im josh (talk) 14:10, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Coach Price]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Neferure

message: Most of what I have read so far suggest that there is no know time/age of death for her and no referance to her ever being married or in line for the crown.
Be skeptical of the information provided. If you read through the whole article it contradicts itself about when she died. The first part says that she had an important role in the court following her mother's passing; the other refers to her death being during the time of her mother's reign. I believe the article about Neferure's mother (Hatshepsut) is much more accurate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.221.41.211 (talk) 02:54, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure what your objection is, as I think you have mis-read the intro section as there's nothing there to suggest that she outlived her mother, but took on some of her mother's previous titles when she moved from being Queen to pharaoh. There is speculation in the "Death" section that she may have outlived her mother, but it is marked as speculation, not fact, and the sources are cited.
Captmondo (talk) 17:16, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  what are your sources for this? 

message: Sorry, but given that it is not even clear when she died, how can it be stated that she died at that age?
That statement must be sourced or removed, because is highly confusing  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.240.125.70 (talk) 09:06, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neferure died when she was 16. 
Talk:Ted Roof

message: I know many editors are eager to update this page to reflect Roof's employement status but he's still a former Div I college coach and the article should reflect that where possible.  Let's leave Roof associated with Duke, until he gets another job.  This treatment is similar to what we'd give a coach who retieres, leaving his association with the last school he coached (or arguably the most notable coaching job he held).  This also ensures that well meaning but delete happy editors are less likely raise concerns about the notability of Roof, which as a former Div-I college coach, he is notable per WP:BIO--Rtphokie (talk) 20:54, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 22:35, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roof's college  
Talk:Young tableau

message: A good 1/3 of the body of this article talks about content relating to the correspondence between a young tableau and a rep of S_n.  But it never talks about what the correspondence is, making a good deal of the body of this article pretty hollow!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:F140:400:A002:9284:DFF:FEF3:FFE5 (talk) 00:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  representation-tableau correspondence lacking
Talk:Clifford Odets

message: The introduction needs more substance about what Odets did, as opposed to his influence and influencers. My ideas for improvement include mentioning more of his works and talking about his style, and moving content related to his influence to the second paragraph.
Akhil 0950 (talk) 00:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information on people surrounding Odets than Odets himself 
Talk:Cholangitis (disambiguation)

message: I'm a little concerned about the contents of the infobox here.  It seems to me that most of the links provided are specific for ascending (infectious) cholangitis, and would therefore belong on ascending cholangitis (which incidentally needs a lot of work).  Only the ICD-10 categorization seems to really provide for an umbrella category for all forms of cholangitis.  — JVinocur (talk • contribs) 03:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the infobox. --Arcadian 10:08, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contents of infobox
Talk:Ain't Misbehavin' (musical)

message: A Character section was added to this article on Jan 14, 2012 by User talk:96.228.113.86. That section is a cut-and-paste from MTI Shows Casting section, see [MTI Shows Casting]. This is a copyright violation, see WP:COPY, and I have deleted the entire section.Flami72 (talk) 19:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The synopsis added on Jan 14, 2012 by User talk:96.228.113.86 is a copyright violation,; it is cut-and-paste from  http://mtishows.com/show_detail.asp?showid=000002. I have deleted it.Flami72 (talk) 20:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation

message: The synopsis added on June 17, 2013 by User_talk:74.102.50.82 is a copyright violation; it is cut-and-paste from  . Deleted, per  WP:COPY. Flami72 (talk) 23:14, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation
Talk:Gene Stallings

message: Founder of the Thickburger?  This is listed as a title on the right sidebar, but not mentioned in the article.  Vandalism maybe?Nycbl1y (talk) 17:43, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Thickburger
Talk:Grand Hotel (musical)

message: *Boston Tryout vs. Broadway
Someone with extensive knowledge of the show's tortured history should revise the Tommy Tune section to include more information about the Boston tryout during which the Yeston-influenced changes began to be effected.  I know a fair amount the original Wright-Forrest version, but little about everything that brought about Yeston's involvement.  Details in the current article are too sketchy and nonspecific to be effective.  --WesternActor 16:22, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Headings are needed to break up the long block of text in this article.  This also moves the table of contents earlier in the article.  -- Ssilvers 02:24, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Headings

message: An anonymous editor tried to delete a paragraph from this article without discussion.  -- Ssilvers 02:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleting paragraph

message: Today I deleted an amateur production taking place in Australia, because it is a production by schools. I deleted per "Amateur productions will be deleted without discussion" in the WP:MT guidelines. The WP:NOTABILITY guidelines are also relevant. Flami72 (talk) 11:17, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Amateur production
Talk:All Shook Up

message: Following guidelines from Wikipedia:WikiProject_Songs, I have removed an infobox and chart position box having to do with Billy Joel's non-notable 1992 cover of the song.
I also removed the rambling list of cover songs by various groups and individuals for the same reason: non-notability.50.90.246.165 (talk) 13:31, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Except that the Billy Joel version does pass the guidelines from Wikipedia:WikiProject Songs in that his version charted on numerous national charts and passes WP:NSONGS.  If this version was its own song, it would be notable enough to have its own article and therefore is able to have its own infobox and section in the article about the song. As such I am adding back the infobox and section to the article. Aspects (talk) 04:24, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Billy Joel material

message: Why is this sentence ""All Shook Up" has proven a steadily popular cover for the rock canon, earning versions by Paul McCartney, Carl Perkins, Jeff Beck, Ry Cooder, Suzi Quatro, Cliff Richard, Albert King, Jim Dale and Humble Pie, among others." in the Composition and Analysis section? I propose moving it to the Other recordings and notable performances section and include links out to the respective covers/albums/artists. --Geoffhunt3 (talk) 16:04, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover versions
Talk:Arthur Laurents

message: If anything, this bio is too unredundant. There is a list of "Additional credits," but it would be nice to have a section simply listing all his major acheivements in one place.  Right now you have to zigzag all over the text and various boxes to get this information.  I suspect a crucial section was removed.  Sojambi Pinola (talk) 17:12, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch! Thanks. (I reordered the chronology.)JeanColumbia (talk) 17:49, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: List missing

message: The article mentions that Arthur Laurents wrote the book of several very successful musicals including West Side Story and Gypsy, but it doesn’t go into any detail about them. Perhaps part of this article was accidentally cut Halcabes (talk) 07:52, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article missing key content 

message: He said that he can predict the future. 31.17.249.203 (talk) 10:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What?
Talk:Niall MacGinnis

message: We show two places: Haverfordwest (text) and Newport, Dyfed (infobox).  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 21:12, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Where did he die?
Talk:High Button Shoes

message: This article states that the book was written by Abbott and Silvers, but ibdb says that it was written by Longstreet.  It gives the novel credit to Longstreet, too.  I just put all three names in the infobox, but I'm not sure which is right.  If anyone can find a source for Abbott and Silvers (or, conversely, Longstreet), feel free to clear up the discrepancy.  —  MusicMaker 03:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  According to Ken Mandelbaum, Longstreet wrote the book (based on his novel), and Abbott revised/rewrote it. He did not mention Phil Silvers in this process. I'll continue to research this tomorrow.JeanColumbia  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JeanColumbia (talk • contribs) 02:10, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ethan Mordden writes about the authorship issue. He also states that George Abbott re-wrote, and does state that Phil Silvers did also. I added the Mordden material, but have not included Silvers in the info box as I am still not sure to what extent he gets credit, formal, legal, or otherwise. JeanColumbia 10:27, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction with ibdb 