lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Janusz Radziwiłł (1612–1655)

message: How should we call the ruler of the Eldership of Samogitia? Iulius 07:04, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Elder has a different meaning, I think. --Lysytalk 07:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nowadays the admnistrators of Lithuanian eldersips are Elders. What about those times? Iulius 07:35, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering articles on Starosta and Elder (administrative title) it is rather obvious that starost it the correct term. It is the official title he had, as described in Offices in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Btw, when did the office of starosta was introduced to Lithuania? Union of Horodło mentions only castellans and voivodes. The offices are a historical mess (when I was writing the 'Offices...' article I discovered it was virtually the system of exceptions :D).-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  18:05, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Starost]] or [[Elder]]?

message: Someone screamed dubious! near the word "vanity". Dubious what?? Why? Rursus declamavi;  16:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious??
Talk:Osees

message: I think there is some incorrect info in the infobox that I'd like to correct.
I think the "Associated Acts" section should be removed entirely. As far as I know, none of the acts currently listed meet the requirements for inclusion as associated acts per the guidelines.
The inclusion of "Dark Chocolate Dan" instead of "Dan Rincon", and Quattrone's "Bioharzard" nickname as current members appears to be defacement; same for "Beef Yeastworthy" in former members. I think these should be removed (and Dan Rincon added as a current member). Someone left an edit note claiming to contain details about Beef Yeastworthy's membership, but I cannot find any record of this person's existence online. I think it's made up.
There are also a few cases of members' names being hyperlinked to other bands they have appeared in. I propose these should be removed. Why should Paul Quattrone's name hyperlink to !!!, when he was also a prominent member of Modey Lemon? Same for Tim Hellman being a member of both Sic Alps and Ty Segall's band.
I'm also unsure how I feel about the caption of the top image. Should the caption use their current name, or the group's name at the time the picture was taken? I'm unaware of the guideline for this, but was thinking that "Osees (then known as Thee Oh Sees) performing in 2010" could be a suitable middle ground. Currently the caption uses a name which is neither the name used currently or at the time of the photograph, which I think is certainly incorrect.
TimberToner (talk) 02:21, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating infobox & members to align to style guidelines
Talk:Battle of Amioun

message: Does anyone know any other details about this battle? --Anthony5429 07:11, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Details... 

message: I'm not sure if this event is historically sound, since there is no "Battle of Amiun" between Byzantines and "Maronite armies" in recorded history, except from a single source by Estephan El Douaihy. If it is not sound, then the article should be changed or described as dubious. In a book called The Maronites in History by Matti Moosa, the author states that the entire episode described by El Douaihy or Al Duwayhi "appears to be groundless", not to mention certain name confusions such as wrongly putting the name of John Maron instead of John or Yuhanna (a probable Mardaites leader) to be the one who fought against the incoming Byzantine army. See link The Maronites in History pp. 141-147 Alain08 (talk) 13:13, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Authenticity
Talk:The Outhere Brothers

message: So, is this meant to be pronounced "out there" or "out here"? May be worth pointing out in the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.83.15.195 (talk) 07:53, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Peanuts

message: "Koi no Fuga" and "Koi no Vacance" aren't the only Peanuts songs that W covered. They were the only ones released as singles, but "Furimukanaide", "Kanashiki 16sai", "Jounetsu no Hana", and "Tintarelli di Luna" were all covered by W, as well. Should this be mentioned in the article? Shivers talk 23:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: W covers
Talk:Crouchmas

message: I'm pretty sure the "Invention of the Cross" was removed from the mass calendar in, or before, 1962, and not in 1969.  The '62 Calendar, still in use for "indult" masses and by SSPX, etc., makes 3 May "Ss. Philip and James the Less," assigned to 1 May previously.  There were calendar revisions in both '55 and '62, I believe, so I'm not sure which it would have been.  As to the office, however, I believe it persisted until the reformed office was published.  IIRC, the old breviary was never revised to coincide with the '55 and '62 missals.  -GSwift 07:15, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Persuaders (R&B group)

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 21:00, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:The Second Shepherds' Play

message: I've deleted the plot summary because it was taken word for word from another web site (http://www.montana.edu/metz/website/theatre/secondshepherds.htm).--Cassmus 07:21, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: I removed the following text as being commentary (and thus original research):
:**********ACTUALLY, there is a reason for the two stories, they are meant to be together.  This is the story of the Apocolypse which would have been well recognized by a medieval audience. Mak is actually symbolic of the antichrist, his whole story is an echo of the biblical telling of the coming of the antichrist.  The following nativity is the story of Christ's second coming, hence this play coming near the end of the Wakefield cycle.************
Loganberry (Talk) 19:22, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed text 

message: I tried to work with the remarks by Palmer and Colletti, but the WP:RS just wasn't there. Both are respected scholars, but there isn't really much investigation into the identity of the Wakefield Master, and mentioning the hypothesis about the amateur historian is v much wp:Undue. Anyhow, such discussion would belong at Wakefield Master rather than in this article. DavidOaks (talk) 17:34, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authorship
Talk:The Playmates

message: The entire song starts slowly with a Cadillac driver with a little Nash Rambler that keeps beeping behind him with the tempo increasing as the Cadillac speeds up to 120 mph and the guy in the Rambler pulls up next to a Cadillac asking "Hey buddy how do I get this car outa second gear?" Therefore, the popular assumed and incorrect title is "the Little Nash Rambler" song. There is nothing wrong with mentioning it in parenthesis. Furthermore, the brands of cars are an integral part of the lyrics. The British "sanitized" version does not convey the irony contained in the song. Web sites listing this song often have the informal extended name of this song. For example, mudcat.org, Retrieved on June 20, 2007. CZmarlin 02:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The "Beep, Beep" song
Talk:Karapatan

message: this is not a copyrighted as
1.  althought most is a direct copy and pates, i made some revisions. by putting additional words like philippines.
2.  Kaparatan is a mas organization in the philippines who would be happy to share their profile. a sort of a copyleftist.pmc 07:22, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

message: I added its participation in the Summit.
--Florentino floro 08:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summit 

message: Esperon accused Karapatan.
--Florentino floro 14:10, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Accusation

message: All accusations that Karapatan is a "front" of the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) are still unproven accusations, and putting unrelated information about the terrorist designation of the CPP in this page is malicious red-tagging and tantamount to vandalism, as exhibited by the repeated edits  of User:Belenardo. Riot kiddo (talk) 17:04, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red-tagging and vandalism 

message: Anong karapatan ang maisilang at mabigyan ng pangalan 130.105.233.21 (talk) 05:01, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arpan
Talk:Mahadaji Shinde

message: Too many weasel words
e.g.
1. Great ruler of Hindustaan the Azimul Iqtadar Maharajadhiraj Srimant MAHADJI SHINDE Srinath Bahadur.
Needs editorial clean up
:This article has become excessively long (49 kilobytes), rambling, and reads like a hasty cut-and-paste job.. It has too many headings, many with little or no text. Many sections have numerous grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors, and the article is riddled with ALL CAPS. The overall tone is non-encyclopedic: non-neutral ("The birth of a Diamond"), and anecdotal. Surely such an important historic character deserves better.Tom Radulovich 15:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  For the cleanup process, I've deleted anecdotal parts: 'Bilada, April 1749' and 'Vijaynagar, 1759'. Salilb (talk) 20:56, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

text: I've cleaned up the page as much as possible. Am removing the re-write tag. Salilb (talk) 15:25, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: This article is very badly written and cluttered with praise words depicting a non neutral point of view. It seems to be ill researched. Definitely needs a clean up
:I agree. I've tried removing some unnecessary stuff. Will be trying to improve it.Salilb (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 20:41, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very poorly written article 

message: The list of references is non encyclopaedic and includes among others private websites and a television  serial. Better references needed.
:I have deleted these references. Salilb (talk) 15:23, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non encyclopaedic references cited 

message: I have been doing the cleanup of this article. I had to first restructure it to a large extent. I began rewriting it from a neutral point of view but carrying the essence of the legacy of Mahadji Shinde since April 2006. So far Ihave only finished "The youth of Mahadji Shinde". By the way I am reverting the cleanup-tone. All help would be apprciated especially photos or maps of the Scindia or Maratha dominion. Holy Warrior Tej 06:50, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mahadji Shinde Cleanup 

message: Mahadji Shinde is how he was known originally. Mahadji Sindhia or Mahadji Scindia are modified versions that came later. Citations are needed for 'Madhavrao I'. 
Deleting his time of birth and date according to Vikram Samvat as its not needed. Salilb (talk) 21:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro

message: * Saying that Nana Phadnavis poisoned Mahadji is a dangerous statement. Serious citations required.
* Removed POV statements.
Salilb (talk) 21:22, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Death and Legacy
Talk:The Rabble

message: This article doesn't establish notability, or really contain much of anything.  I researched the band a bit and with self-released albums and no press links on their website, I dunno...  Editors, establish notability in the article or article will be dumped and burned in hell. 216.138.112.154 (talk) 22:26, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:GE Capital Aviation Services

message: There is some confusion about where this fits in GE's corporate structure (and thus how it should be categorized). Per  GECAS is in GE Infrastructure, and it is not listed on , but it is listed on . I think having subcategories under Category:General Electric subsidiaries for each of the six GE business helps clarify the structure; I will add GECAS to both for now. --RNLion 07:29, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see what the hubub is about. Just look at the logo: It tells you exactly which umbrella GECAS falls under. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 19:54, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Touché. The logo was out of date. Current logo from  uploaded to :Image:GECAS_Logo.png. — RNLion 01:49, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorization 

message: I have had a tidy up of the article to try and introduce some history of the company and gain some balance, the unreferenced list of operators has been removed as it is fairly useless and not really needed. I also turned the history section into something about the business, a list of recent orders is not relevant its what the company does all the time, and listing every order over the twenty-odd years for thousands of aircraft is again not really needed. If anybody has more cited information on the actual history of the company then please add it, thanks MilborneOne (talk) 19:44, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Tidy
Talk:Raghu Dixit

message: this sounds like fan-worship. please tone it. Rohit Bhatia a.k.a spaceman spliff (talk) 06:06, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone 

message: I second the comments above re: "Tone."  The article needs a rewrite.  I may propose for deletion.  Saebvn (talk) 00:48, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Comment re: Tone; Potential Candidate for Deletion 

message: https://www.financialexpress.com/entertainment/metoo-campaign-in-india-singer-raghu-dixit-accused-of-sexual-harassment-he-apologises/1344502/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by VellaInsaan (talk • contribs) 07:34, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  MeToo Allegations?
Talk:Stefan Sagmeister

message: there's a German language entry for Sagmeister that's much more detailed, if any german speaking editors want to translate it. Jesse K. 07:30, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Deleted "Sagmeister along with other designers is considered to be a part of the designer's star system", because there is no evidence that a particular "designer's star system" (whatever this is) exists. Google search shows that it seems to be a quote copied from somewhere where it has been copied from somewhere else etc ... -Plakatmann (talk) 18:37, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  designer's star system 
Talk:The Red Hot Valentines

message: what happened to bass player David Gerkin?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justagirl77 (talk • contribs) 20:39, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  update on band member
Talk:The Reddings

message: I had a PR flyer in one of their records (I think it was 'Class') Stating that their first ever relase was called "the Reddings" on the label: 'Believe in a dream' records. (So before and up to 1980) It could be a 45 RPM or a 12" or an LP. Not to be confused with their 1988 LP "the reddings" On polygram of polydor.
ANYONE (including the artists) having any info on this record. please could you share ? I've been looking for it for over 20 years....!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.170.115.168 (talk) 15:47, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking for the ghost - lost album or 45 RPM
Talk:The Redneck Manifesto (band)

message: I feel that the page is now fully sourced and deserving of a B class rating. The bulk was just taken from their labels blurb by somebody. Just need to sort out a picture--irishmagpie (talk) 00:38, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As a member of the WikiProject Ireland assessment team, this should be assessed by one of the team and not by editors who are actively editing this article themselves because their view may not be objective. I am reassessing this as a C-class especially because there are too few references and the MySpace external link fails WP:EL. ww2censor (talk) 15:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Which link fails?? They all work for me. The entire article is basically their label's piece on them. Somebody (not me) just took it.irishmagpie (talk) 12:44, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:The Regents (doo-wop band)

message: There are now three articles about three different bands with the same name: Regents, The Regents, Regents (band).  I believe this is confusing and contrary to Wikipedia policy.  I would propose that the example of the two groups called 'The Beat' is followed: The Beat (British band) and The Beat (American band) are used, with no one band allowed to 'own' the name.  I would suggest the following: 'The Regents (British Band)', 'The Regents (American doo-wop band)' and 'The Regents (American punk band)'.  There would also be a disambiguation page listing all three.  Any views? Peteinterpol (talk) 21:17, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed change - three different bands called the Regents.
Talk:The Renegades (TV series)

message: Renegades (TV series) and The Renegades are about the same television show. Gyrofrog  (talk) 22:46, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Why even waste any time "proposing" this, if they are in fact the same show? Someone should just merge them the best way as soon as possible. Sheesh... - 187.20.71.73 (talk) 08:51, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Renegades (TV series)]]
Talk:The Riverboat Gamblers

message: Do fans of bands think this helps in the slightest? This is the biggest type of false information I constantly see on Wikipedia pages for bands. I'll remove the tidbit about the last album going platinum.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.140.91.36 (talk) 18:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Fake RIAA certifications

message: I cleaned up and made accurate a few things on here.  Thank you to whoever you are that helped out a while back.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fadi El-Assad (talk • contribs) 19:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is my band
Talk:Riverdales

message: I removed the bit about Dan Panic being charged with molestation.  There's no citation at all and is a potentially slanderous commnet.
The Civilized Worm (talk) 16:08, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Molestation charge

message: Where did the picture go??? put it back please.
--Deedeek (talk) 14:27, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:The Ronettes

message: The article states that Ronnie had dropped the idea of continuing the Ronettes in 1975. However she appeared on an episode of Sha Na Na in the late 1970s backed by a version of the Ronettes (not the originals). So is that 1975 date correct or was the Ronettes continuation discontinued at a later date? 23skidoo (talk) 21:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: 1970s Ronettes

message: Are Estelle and Veronica not labelled the wrong way round? Paul Magnussen (talk) 03:46, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top photo
Talk:Rossington Collins Band

message: Whoever did that edit to the Anytime, Anyplace, Anywhere Demos section, please do not do it again.  That was a long-winded argument that was carried out between him and another person.  I don't want to be in the middle of that argument again. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.110.23.227 (talk) 19:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kent Griffith section vandalism 

message: I have removed large tracts of text, that were completely unreferenced, opinionated and, in most cases minutiae and trivia.  Please bear in mind this is an encyclopedia not a fansite, and refer to Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Trivia before adding further fancruft etc. The article badly needs in-line citations, not froth. Thanks,
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 12:46, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: POV and trivia
Talk:Arab Legion

message: Why does the introduction say "not to be confused with the Transjordan Frontier Force, when that's what the first paragraph of the main body is talking about? Xt828 08:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transjordan Frontier Force? 

message: It serves no purpose to hide this historical fact, especially not in the lead, which offers the definition, or short description, of the force. Reality check: Transjordan was not an independent state, and Brits commanded the Legion until 1956 (top commander an several key officers). It wasn't Transjordan that went to war in WWII, the Empire did, and it wasn't the UK that went to war in 1948, Transjordan did. It was a process. This must be acknowledged and reflected in the lead. Arminden (talk) 07:25, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  British force first, Jordanian one progressively
Talk:The Salteens

message: Just curious to why in the info box it says that the band has been active from 2004 - Present, even though they released a CD back in 2000? Kev1n 07:30, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pièces à Conviction

message: I will add more to this article momentarily.  Thank you for your patience.  Yours, Smeelgova 07:44, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem, but please, instead of creating an empty page and then adding content, do write your articles before you create a page for them, or at least use the wip tag in the page you're currently working on! --Nehwyn 07:52, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, point well taken.  Thank you.  Yours, Smeelgova 08:08, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Give me some time

message: Please do not change the translation of the title back to something like "exhibit". The terms pièces à conviction and incriminating evidence are identical in that they both refer to evidence introduced in a criminal trial by the prosecution in order to help convict the defendant. The word "exhibit" can refer to evidence introduced by either the prosecution or by the defense in a criminal trial, or by either party in a civil proceeding. "Exhibit" is also very vague in that it has common meanings outside law (like a zoo or museum exhibit). Andrew Levine 21:44, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the clarification.  I had originally utilized the term "incriminating evidence", but others had changed this.  I'm glad that we have input from someone more versed in the language.  Smee 05:56, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of title 

message: The redirect Incriminating evidence has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  ltbdl (talk) 11:26, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Incriminating evidence]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:The Savage Rose

message: I am a BIG Savage Rose fan, and I do not believe that they may be categorized as "psychedelic," although certainly some of their music may.  Please listen to a broader range of their music.Cospelero (talk) 18:31, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While Cristgau may be a key reviewer in US 70s counterculture, the review pasted into this article about a long lasting non-English European band is such a pile of uninformed spiteful personal attacks based on only one early album that it shouldn't be elevated to be the final word about 50 years as an iconic voice in political music.
77.213.212.241 (talk) 16:28, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cristgau's hateful and uninformed review needs to go