lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of memory biases

message: What is the origin of this list? Can you cite references? Mr. Jones 12:53, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin

message: Can this information be expressed in more of an encyclopedic fashion, and less like a list? -- weirdoactor t|c 21:06, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're right: this article should probably be moved to Memory bias (which will require administrative intervention, as Memory bias has history from before it became a redirect to List of memory biases) and made more like a normal article. (Lists aren't inherently bad, but in this case there doesn't seem to be any advantage of alphabetical-list over some sort of structured-and-weighted article.) —RuakhTALK 21:48, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this article in violation of [[WP:NOT#DIR]]? 

message: The "Lag effect," "List-length effect," and "Processing difficulty effect" are not explained in the article, nor do they link to anything to explain them. What are they? Dude1818 (talk) 04:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unexplained 

message: *Support - makes perfect sense, can't think why this has been outstanding since August!  Pesky (talk …stalk!) 13:43, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  It has been suggested that List of memory biases be merged into [[List of cognitive biases]] 

message: These are well established as biases of judgement, but I don't recall seeing these being described as memory biases. Can we please have quotes from the sources that establish them specifically as memory biases? MartinPoulter (talk) 21:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Placement effect and Subadditivity effect 

message: I'm not an expert, but should any food or beverage tasting biases be added as examples to this article?  Such as color biases or geographic origin bias for wine tasting?  There are similar biases for beer and food.  see Wine tasting#Blind tasting for examples.  If yes, then please add to this article.  • Sbmeirow • Talk • 11:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wine tasting biases 

message: False memory ought to be in the see also section. With the popularity of the "Mandela Effect" in popular culture it seems like it belongs somewhere on this page. It's certainly related. (This is my first time editing Wikipedia so I'm nervous to actually do it myself, in case it doesn't belong.) 67.141.61.118 (talk) 16:17, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  False Memory
Talk:Scientific consensus on global warming

message: It is proposed to repoint the page to Climate change consensus shortly.   Please record any concerns with proceeding.  Thanks.  ‒ Jaymax✍ 10:11, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur.  --GoRight (talk) 14:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repoint 
Talk:Ankylosing spondylitis

message: I have ankylosing spondylitis and have been put on Humira and methotrexate which has dramatically reduced my pain due to inflammation. I took every NSAID there is including Celebrex (Cox-2 drug). I didn’t see any mention of this newer medication.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:5C6:C300:7A60:A421:15C9:A1BC:79C4 (talk) 21:36, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Acryloyl group

message: :The carboxyl group of acrylic acid can react with ammonia to form acrylamide, or with an alcohol to form an acrylate ester.
These aren't really reactions that happen to the C=O double bond of an acryl group, are they? They seem to be ways to form acrylic compounds in the first place. Also, do the acrylates technically have acryl groups? AxelBoldt 15:36, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pieces of You

message: How can it be 12x platinum when it sold less than 9 million copies? Shouldn't it be 8x platinum? Am I missing something here? trying to be a jerk, just wondering what's going on.Hsxeric (talk) 14:58, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank streaming and YouTube. CB19 (talk) 21:47, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Certification
Talk:Ptolemaic system

message: What about the beliefe there existed two orthogonal oceans, thus both lat/lon was limited to 90/180 deg bounds.Didn't he (Ptolemy) stop making maps near the extreme coordinates, claiming nothing could exist there? (83.226.130.159 16:05, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Pythagoras talked about the music of the spheres earlier, though he may have referred to ratios or intervals between the orbits rather than literal music. (Hence, "humans cannot hear.") I don't know if Ptolemy even postulated literal crystalline spheres, or if he thought the heavenly bodies moved in response to heavenly Intelligences without physical cause. (I know Aristotle postulated an Intelligence of sorts for each different circular motion, so each imagined epicycle would have its own Mover.) But certainly some in the Middle Ages would have agreed with this. Dan 19:49, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

message: The image currently in the article is a good one to illustrate the celestial spheres but lacks much of the key elements of the Ptolemaic system (no epicycles, etc.). I'll try to find another one which will work, but if someone else knows a good, expired source... --Fastfission 23:11, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: I think this article should be merged with Geocentric model. LambiamTalk 10:47, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I favor redirecting from Geocentric model to here. --Art Carlson 14:17, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I support, and I am tagging both articles accordingly. Maestlin 00:24, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Disagree, Ptolemaic is not the only geocentric model. Heraclides Ponticus and Tycho Brahe both proposed models that were geocentric but completely different from Ptolemy. Do you propose to merge Tychonic system into the same article? Cutler 07:54, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I still support a merge only if the material ends up in the Geocentric model article. However, I can't agree with the specific examples you cited. The Tychonic system is geoheliocentric, not pure geocentric, so there's no compelling reason to merge it. There has been a lot of debate over what system Heraclides actually advocated, but I assume you have in mind the sort of thing Martianus Capella described? That probably deserves a description in both articles, as well as heliocentric. A better example is the Platonic order, which is clearly geocentric yet different from Ptolemy. Maestlin 15:20, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Geocentric model?
Talk:Zionist Revisionism

message: Can we have some discussion here, please? Gady 20:58, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Mikkalai, we are not arguing about grammer. The problem is that there is no such thing as "Zionist revisionism". Nobody refers to himself as such nor do people refer to others as such (outside this dispute). The sole purpose of this title is to equate Jayjg's views with Holocaust denial. This phrase is simply inacceptable in any combination. Gady 00:01, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it's not about my views at all, it's about what certain editors imagine my views to be. Jayjg 02:40, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

text: You are wrong, sorry. And I am wrong as well, by the way. Mikkalai 07:18, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: How am I wrong, and how are you wrong? Gady 12:06, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Black (disambiguation)

message: This page would be involved in a structural change related to the black (color) page. See this discussion. CoyneT 03:15, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Structural change proposal

message: I fail to see why this paragraph is included in the article:
: Black may be also used as a colorist term to describe someone who is African American, or has a darker skin tone. Though a ethnic slur, it is widely accepted by the general community as an acceptable term, when compared to other terms for African Americans, such as Negro. In example one could say, "Martin Luther King Jr. is a famous black activist."
When there is not a similar one for the White article. Or am I being ignorant?  - sorfane 16:40, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colorist 
Talk:Sacred king

message: The title of this page should be "Rex Sacrorum" with an English translation of "Sacred King" being provided.  This is because most of the other titles are not translated from Latin (namely Rex Nemorensis).
I had to remove Heracles, but I added Attis in his place. --Wetman 17:01, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: The critique of Frazier is not good, and should be removed or improved.  The author's charge seems to be that the hypothesis is so vague that any myth can be accommodated to it.  But that clearly is not true.  The hypothesis is that the sacred king dies and is reborn.  Thus, the hypothesis would seem to preclude the assimilation of any myth regarding a god that is eternal or immortal or undying.
Also, the author's tone in dealing with Frazier's hypothesis is unduly dimissive snide.  What is the factual basis that justifies the use of this tone?  If the point that the author is trying to make is that no myths exist exemplifying the hypothesis, then he should say so, and cite his sources.  To do so, of course, would contradict the bold assertion that just about any myth can be accommodated to Frazier's hypothesis.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DoktorMax (talk • contribs) 03:01, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A good deal of babble has permeated this text. "Kings of England who died in office" is too funny to delete. --Wetman 01:22, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Critique of Frazier 

message: This is a pretty poor article really.  For example: the author doesn't cite a source for his suggestion that the Bible suggests God was angry at the Israelites due to Moab's sacrifice of his eldest son (which does indeed seem illogical, and I doubt that this is generally agreed upon by Torah/Biblical scholars).  Moreover "inthronisation" is a pretty obscure term: what about "enthronement"?
Agreed.  It's unsubstantiated original research and personal opinion.  Proceeding to delete the section.
--Archestrategos (talk) 04:33, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unscholarly article 

message: The adjective 'sacral' has been used a number of times in this article, alternating with 'sacred'. Unless there is a very good reason for retaining it, I propose that all instances of 'sacral' be replaced with 'sacred'. 'Sacral' in normal usage means 'pertaining to or of the sacrum' which is part of the human anatomy. In Slavic languages, however, the Latin import 'sacral' does mean 'sacred' and is the only Latin import with that meaning. Native speakers of Slavic languages, even when their English is otherwise perfect, can occasionally make mistakes of this kind. --Ligia Luckhurst (talk) 00:33, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sacral - sacred 

message: This sounds like fashionable atheist talk to me.  I have no problem with atheists being atheists, but when bias affects reality, it has no place in an encyclopedia.  Proceeding to delete the unsubstantiated biased personal claim.
--Archestrategos (talk) 04:39, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:   Transferrance of "Savior" title?
Talk:Supersymmetric quantum mechanics

message: I removed a comment about SUSY QM only applying to non-relativistic quantum mechanics, as this is not entirely accurate.  As described in Thaller's textbook The Dirac Equation, problems involving relativistic charged particles in various potentials can be connected, through SUSY, to non-relativistic cases that are more easily soluble.  Both Thaller and the 1995 review article cited on supersymmetry describe how to apply SUSY to an electron in a Coulomb potential, accounting for all relativistic effects.  This gives an expression for the energy levels accurate to terms in α4, I believe, including lots of fine and hyperfine structure.  (I have to check to be sure, but I believe this expression is too precise for its own good.  Whether derived using SUSY trickery or not, the smallest term—of highest order in α—may be smaller than the Lamb shift, which is due to EM field quantization and isn't included in the Dirac formulation.  I don't have all the equations in front of me, so don't take my word for it.  Anyway, this "problem" isn't with the machinery used to get the answer, but with the answer itself, so it's really tangential to the point under discussion.)
The SUSY inherent in the Dirac Equation is most apparent in the case of a massless electron, which I admit is slightly unphysical.  Still, the properties are there, and they do provide a practical aid to calculation.
Hey!  The first snow of winter is falling outside.
Anville 17:02, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relativity
Talk:Deva

message: :a Dacian city in Dacia in 100 CE
In Dacian, "Deva" (or "Dava"/"Daba") means 'a city', that's why many toponyms end in '-dava'. It was not a certain city. Bogdan | Talk 20:41, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: yes, it meant "city", it wasn't a city in itself -- criztu
woa, there's nothing here about superstar female artists? Blueaster 20:09, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Dacian city
Talk:James Wood

message: I do not know how to create a separate article for James Wood the critic, especially as I don't know his middle name.
81.156.49.248
May I suggest using the phrase the critic as part of the article name? --Masssiveego 08:39, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: November 2004

message: How about a link to James Woods the actor? --Fshafique 09:24, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: February 2007
Talk:Darts

message: Where is electronic or soft tip darts ???? This article is written as if only steel darts is played. Soft darts world championhips: SDWC The World, IDF World Championship, SDWF World Championship (Compumatic), Soft Tip Bullshooter World Championship, IDF Darts World Cup, FECS World Championship. Setenzatsu.2 (talk) 22:16, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing half of the subject !! 

message: There have been instances of friends or couples playing with darts and hitting each other. In one of the horrific incidents, a woman asked her boyfriend to throw a dart above her head but it her eye instead. It took sometime for onlookers to realize what was happening.https://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-1676480/Video-Guy-throws-dart-girlfriends-head-hits-eye.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ckatipel (talk • contribs) 16:09, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safety Concerns 

message: Terminology should be explained: double, triple, bull (is this the same as "bulls eye"?), flight, barrel, etc.  And it should be consistent.  (Is "treble" the same as "triple"?) The section about electronic dartboards and how they operate was not clear to me. - Jkgree (talk) 21:46, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes 

message: New section idea: Bullseye (1981 British game show), connection with pub culture, comedy involving big bellies, Brainiac Darts, Heartlands, Shaun of the Dead ...  Bogger (talk) 16:00, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darts in popular culture 

message: As a casual darts player in the UK I've never heard anybody call players 'dartists'. With such a prominent position in the opening paragraph, and a reference that dates from 1975, I question its priority and modern accuracy. 80.7.82.194 (talk) 19:16, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed: in addition to the fact that Wiktionary has a more narrow definition than merely a synonym for "darts player", this doesn't belong in the opening paragraph. I've been bold and removed it. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 20:47, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  'dartists' 

message: Just a question... shouldn't there be an article for every common darts game itself as well? I mean, darts is not just darts, if people talk about darts it's commonly "501 darts" they're talking about, so an article such as 501 darts should be appropriate, just as every football code has their own articles.
The article 501 darts would include tactics (checkout rules of thumb and so on) just like the other sports do? 95.91.229.88 (talk) 02:02, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Be WP:BOLD and create it. Slywriter (talk) 10:35, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darts games
Talk:Leesburg, Florida

message: Should there be a section on cults and membership percentages? Wikipietime (talk) 00:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cults 

message: Is the town named after Robert E Lee? If so it should be added to the history section. Georgewashingtonshorse (talk) 20:50, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Named after Lee
Category talk:Beach volleyball players

message: Discussion from Wikipedia:Categories for deletion. Three of the four people who responded seem to think that the category should be kept. -Aranel ("Sarah") 18:47, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: CFD discussion

message: Category too specific with not enough articles, use :Category: Volleyball players —Mike 18:36, Oct 16, 2004 (UTC)
*But these are two different sports! Might as well merger Rugby union footballers with Rugby league players! jguk 20:49, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Beach volleyball players]]
Talk:St Andrew-by-the-Wardrobe

message: Please note that St Andrew-by-the-Wardrobe (not Andrew by-the-Wardrobe) is the official name of this church. -- ChrisO 19:40, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: What does this mean??
:"This church has been alive and had by regular weekly Sunday services conducted by the Syrian Orthodox church (founded by St Thomas the Apostle in India) for the last 40 years."
Perhaps "had by regular weekly Sunday services" should be "had regular biweekly Sunday services"? And what does "been alive" mean? It has an active congregation? It once had an active congregation?
A bit of digging in Wikipedia and elsewhere suggests that the "Syrian Orthodox Church" is the Indian Orthodox Church, whose London website is here. Their website is not detailed, but seems to suggest that services at St. Andrew-by-the-Wardrobe are weekly. I propose removing the bit about St Thomas the Apostle, since it is almost certainly controversial (it appears to rely on the Acts of Thomas as a source, written about 150 years after the events described).
Unless anyone objects soon, I will change it to
:"Regular Sunday services have been conducted here by the Indian Orthodox Church for the last 30 years"
Mtford 03:29, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad sentence - Syrian Orthodox Church
Talk:Robert Robinson (chemist)

message: I first called this page "Sir Robert Robinson"; it was moved, for no good
reason that I can see, and in mild violation of Wikipedia naming policy, to "Robert Robinson (scientist)".  If there was a good reaon for this move, please indicate them here, otherwise I propose to move it back to its starting place. ---- Charles Stewart 19:52, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Sir Thomas Sean Connery is also without his Sir and I know Robert Robinson but never saw a publication signed "Sir Robert Robinson" so I think the move was OK.--Stone 19:37, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The relevant guideline is Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names_and_titles)#Other_non-royal_names, item 5. First, it says "Titles of Knighthood such as Sir and Dame should not be included in the article title: use personal name instead, e.g., Arthur Conan Doyle not Sir Arthur Conan Doyle". But later it says "'Sir' may be used in article titles as a disambiguator". I'm not sure if I'm interpreting this correctly, but I think it means that if there is only one person with a given name, then the title should not be used, but if there are multiple people with a given name (as is the case here), and one of them was knighted, then we can include the title. --Itub (talk) 13:59, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of this page 

message: The arrow pushing for the tropinone synthesis mechanism is abysmal. Either a full, accurate electron pushing mechanism for the synthesis should be made or the diagram should be edited to remove the arrows entirely. I'm not sure which is the best course of action. Mdlevin (talk) 04:35, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: * I've replaced the old image with the new one for now. Do you think its better to remove the chemistry entirely? I think its important considering that its one of Robinson's most important contributions. If there's some style guide that says otherwise I guess I'd understand removing it. Mdlevin (talk) 00:22, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tropinone Mechanism
Talk:Gunter rig

message: ::::Johnbibby 13:06, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambuguation needed

message: I have started a rewrite of this article. Please be patient as it will take a bit of time.
Major references are  and   ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 00:10, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite started 

message: This page has been moved from Gunter rig to Gunter without any discussion or evidence from RSs. Evidence to support "Gunter rig" is as follows:
Generally, the word gunter seems to work as an adjective in normal maritime usage. WP:NOUN
RSs:
Roger Barnes: The Dinghy Cruising Companion,  20 usages of the word "gunter", 14 in conjunction with "rig" or "rigged", remainder in conjunction with "mainsail", "sail" or "yard".No usage of the word on its own.
John Leather: Spritsails and Lugsails - this is a definitive source, quoted by many other authoritative sources. Extensive coverage of the subject, talking about  "gunter lug" and "gunter rig" (gunter rig was derived from the lugsail)
Glossary of Nautical Terms, Practical Boat Owner Magazine  "Gunter lug" (so, the old-fashioned form, but still an adjective)
Jane's Dictionary of Naval Terms uses "Gunter rig"
The only form that I can detect where "gunter" is acting as a noun is in "sliding gunter". This was originally a type of slide rule invented by a mathematician called Gunter, and an early version of gunter rig was called "sliding gunter" because the arrangement (supposedly - there is no hard evidence) reminded the yachtsmen of the slide rule. "Sliding gunter" is a now relatively rare variant of gunter rig. This is all explained in the Language of Sailing, whose entry on the subject is: "gunter rig".
I respectfully suggest that User:MB should(a) undo the page move;(b) present some evidence to support their position;(c) seek a consensus on the matter. ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 19:16, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: My reason was that it was listed as just "gunter" on gunter (disambiguation) since that page was created in 2007 and is so listed here and here. MB 19:35, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: These arguments seem to use Wikipedia and Wiktionary as if they were reliable sources (which they are not) and puts a general dictionary up against sources that specifically cover sailing rigs or nautical matters. Surely these latter types of references prevail. (Worth noting, in passing, that the Oxford English Dictionary is notorious for bad definitions of nautical terms.) ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 19:42, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: For usage by (possibly) the commonest classes of boat with this rig, see . "Gunter" is always an adjective as used in this link. You have not addressed WP:NOUN.ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 19:48, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've asked at WP:RMTR for a revert of the undiscussed and controversial move, and I've fixed the disambig page, which really needs to move to just Gunter since there's clear no primarytopic. Dicklyon (talk) 21:51, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate page move
Category talk:Calendars

message: I think the Days, Weeks and Months categories are a bit oddly organised at the moment:
*The days of the week appear in Weeks
*The months of the year appear in Days
Any reasoning behind this? violet/riga (t) 20:14, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: comments

message: WP:Calendars appears to be defunct - WP:TIME seems to be the default for calendars now satusuro 12:13, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Project
Talk:Barbershop (film)

message: Still need to add in the other characters, as well as the plot synopsis. --b. Touch 20:22, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Characters and plot synopsis