lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mohammed Abdullah Al Hamiri

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 05:59, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed picture 

message: I reverted a recent edit  as per this discussion.  Geo Swan (talk) 06:08, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  revert  -- see talk 

message: I reverted the poorly explained excision of the section based on the publication of this captive's medical records.  The contributor who excised this section from this article excised similar sections from half a dozen other articles -- again without making an attempt to discuss their concern.
I responded to one of those excisions here.  Geo Swan (talk) 07:33, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  explanation 

message: Additional explanation to my edit summary and the related policies. 
"not relevant for his notability" The release of medical records of Guantanamo detainees might be interesting in the broader topic of Guantanamo, as for example some of the detainees claim they have suffered health damages. But this is the biography of Mohammed Abdullah Al Hamiri and there are no secondary sources in the article that discuss his personal health to a level where it could become relevant. The inclusion of this material is not relevant to Mohammed Abdullah Al Hamiri's notability and can not be included under WP:NPF.
"insufficient sourced" from WP:NPF  The section is based on a primary source and therefore it can not be included.  
"private information that could be possible harmful" Medical information are very personal information. All countries around the world i know have laws against the publishing of medical records. Publishing of medical information is restricted unless the individual agrees to it. Why? I can easily imagine a lot of situations where this could be harmful to an individual. An insurance company could reject to sell him a policy or potential employer could reject to give him a job...
Only one of these three reasons would justify an removal. This is not even a border-line case here. The material needs to be removed as soon as possible in accordance with our policies. Iqinn (talk) 08:00, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medical records 

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 22:41, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Another useful source is the The Guantanamo Docket it is an interactive database provided and updated by the New York Times. The database is searchable and has the Pentagon documents (CSRT and ARB) included. Additional documents and reliable New York Times research regarding the detainees at Guantanamo are also provided. This is the link to the documents and research regarding Mohammed Abdullah al Hamiri. IQinn (talk) 14:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rough work
Talk:Mohammed Ahmad Ghulam Rabbani

message: This article is one of a series that had a number of valid and useful wikilinks removed with an edit summary "unlink interpretation of questionable source".
I don't think this is a sufficient explanation, and I don't think this removal of wikilinks was a good idea.
I think the wikilinks should be restored to this article and the other articles.  Geo Swan (talk) 22:41, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  removal of valid and useful wikilinks 
Talk:Mohammed Ahmed Salam

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 07:50, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed picture 

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 20:29, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rough work
Talk:Telent

message: A big deal has been made on this article about the capitalisation of telent/Telent. I'm a veteran of the BAE SYSTEMS/BAE Systems debate. The conclusion of that is why should we listen to BAE's insistence of BAE SYSTEMS? The same could apply here. Mark83 21:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia policy has a position on this matter, and it says to not copy a style of lowercase initial letters like this. Mauls (talk) 18:33, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Mohammed Ali Abdullah Bwazir

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 21:32, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Another useful source is the The Guantanamo Docket it is an interactive database provided and updated by the New York Times. The database is searchable and has the Pentagon documents (CSRT and ARB) included. Additional documents and reliable New York Times research regarding the detainees at Guantanamo are also provided. This is the link to the documents and research regarding Mohammed Ali Abdullah Bwazir. IQinn (talk) 05:12, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rough work 
Talk:Mohammed Aman (detainee)

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 16:03, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed picture 

message: Someone is going around changing every use of Farsi to Persian.
They are doing so without regard to whether "Farsi" is a direct quote or paraphrase of the source documents.
They are doing so without regard to whether "Farsi" is followed by .
When I know it is a direct quote or paraphrase I am changing it back.  Geo Swan (talk) 21:30, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  questionable edits... 

message: I merged and redirected Mohammed Amon into this article. Same person (alternate spelling - confirmed by NYT's dockets) - information and sources already covered here. IQinn (talk) 15:58, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I merged and redirected Amer Mohammon into this article. Also the same person. IQinn (talk) 16:06, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Another Merge
Talk:Mohammed Ayub

message: Some wikitags oblige tag placers to explain themselves on the talk page.  I asked for advice, on WP:ANI, on how to deal with tage like this, when the tag placer has not fulfilled that obligation to offer a further explanation.  I was told, several years ago, that when the tag was placed more than 24 hours previously, and hasn't yet fulfilled their obligation to offer that explanation, that I could simply remove the abandoned tag.
This tag has not been accompanied by an explanation on the talk page.
I asked for advice on WP:Village pump (policy)/Archive 80#WRT tags that oblige tag placers to explain themselves on the talk page.  Geo Swan (talk) 19:54, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The tag says "may be found on the talk page". Nothing wrong with this tag. IQinn (talk) 21:28, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WRT wikitags that oblige tag placers to explain themselves on the talk page
Talk:Mohammed Fenaitel Mohamed Al Daihani

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.   Geo Swan 05:05, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed picture 

message: I reverted a recent edit  as per this discussion.  Geo Swan (talk) 06:12, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  revert  -- see talk 
Talk:Mohammed Ismail

message: I reverted this edit.
The sentence: "For purposes of clarification, they are the same person.":
*Is not backed up by a citation.
*Does not explain the age mismatch.
*Risks being regarded as a violation of the no original research policy, in particular, the clause proscribing "novel synthesis".  No authoritative reliable source has tied Mohammed Ismail to Muhammed Ismail Agha -- so we can't assert it as a fact.
Cheers!  Geo Swan 02:30, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  revert -- see talk
Talk:Mohammed Mohammed Hassen

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 14:00, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{tl|npov}} tag as per dispute on [[Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption]] 

message: An edit was made here by a DoD IP address, User:130.22.190.5: .
An adjacent IP address, User:130.22.190.10 just said he was a current Guantanamo guard, so I believe these edits were also made by someone at Guantanamo.
I'd like to ask, generally, for good faith editors from the DoD to identify themselves as such.
Cheers!  Geo Swan (talk) 14:55, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anonymous edits from Guantanamo... 

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 20:36, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Another useful source is the The Guantanamo Docket it is an interactive database provided and updated by the New York Times. The database is searchable and has the Pentagon documents (CSRT and ARB) included. Additional documents and reliable New York Times research regarding the detainees at Guantanamo are also provided. This is the link to the documents and research regarding Mohammed Mohammed Hassen. IQinn (talk) 12:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rough work
Talk:Mohammed Mubarek Salah Al Qurbi

message: I think default sort is a mistake for individuals with Arabic names.
People with Arabic names don't inherit a surname, like people with an European do.
Traditionally the closest thing they have to a "last name" is their father's first name.
And it is absolutely clear to me that it is a mistake to use default sort for the Guantanamo captives -- because the US Department of Defense can't consistently figure out what their names are. 
Therefore I just reverted an edit where a well-meaning contributor imposed default sort on this individual.
Please don't impose default sort on these guys without discussing it first. 
Cheers!  Geo Swan (talk) 04:28, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think default sort is a mistake for Arabic names
Talk:Mohammed Mustafa Sohail

message: Is this individual significant enough to have in an encyclopedia?  What has he done of particular note?  Could this information not be better included in a list of Guatanamo detainees, rather than giving him his own stub?  I feel this article needs some clarification of this individual's notability.  I will check back, but I am considering proposing deletion of this article.
66.192.126.3 04:51, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Significance?

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 15:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed picture
Talk:Terror Twilight

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 21:49, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''

message: Release date for Spit, according to it's article, means that it should come after Carrot Rope, or perhaps the release date is incorrect. Also, is Spit a single or an EP?
-Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 03:29, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does "Carrot Rope" come before "Spit on a Stranger"?
Talk:Jane's AH-64D Longbow

message: Is it just me, or does this article have some serious NPOV issues? And I quote: "ultra-realistic PC flight simulator of the world's most advanced attack helicopter", "Over 250 missions in all!", and "Fly nap-of-the-earth across 20,000 kilometers of fully textured rolling terrain, modelled on real US geological survey digital elevation maps." Am I the only one seeing this? 68.103.131.22 (talk) 23:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV? 

message: Yes, this article seems to be in blatant violation of WP:NPOV. I also suspect
copyright violation. For now I have tagged the offending section with . Feel free to be bold. Oldlaptop321 (talk) 15:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No, you are not
Talk:Lords of the Realm II

message: Lords of the Realm II: Siege Pack now redirects here.  It seems unnecessary for the expansion to have it's own page.  A discussion of what the SP added could just be put in a section on this page. Shador5529 14:51, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

message: Suggestion for an added section.  Compatability with Windows operating systems.  Of course it works on Win 95, and it also worked on Win98 (all versions), dont know about 2000.  Unless you donwloaded certain hacked files, most people couldnt get LOTRII to work on XP or Vista (even under Win 95/98 compatablity modes).  LOTRII does indeed work on Win7 installed directly from the game's cd with no modification.  I know much of this would need citations, but I think it would be a nice touch.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.99.65.63 (talk) 21:30, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compatability 

message: I'm not sure I understand what's going on with the Diplomacy section, under Gameplay.  It appears part of it repeats, but I don't want to butcher the section if I'm wrong. Ihavenomouth (talk) 12:53, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diplomacy 

message: Commercial Site re-releasing old games made to run with later windows version via DOSbox.
http://www.gog.com/en/gamecard/lords_of_the_realm_royal_edition
Don't really know if its permitted to put for-profit links in "Eternal Links" section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.70.80.179 (talk) 12:23, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Old Games
Talk:Mohammed Nasir Yahya Khusruf

message: In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 
* "Arb2StatementIsn509" :
** 

** 

DumZiBoT (talk) 01:42, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot report : Found duplicate references! 

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 21:16, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Another useful source is the The Guantanamo Docket it is an interactive database provided and updated by the New York Times. The database is searchable and has the Pentagon documents (CSRT and ARB) included. Additional documents and reliable New York Times research regarding the detainees at Guantanamo are also provided. This is the link to the documents and research regarding Mohammed Nasir Yahya Khusruf. IQinn (talk) 13:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rough work
Talk:Mohammed Quasam

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 15:07, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed picture 

message: Seems to be the same person as Muhammed Qasim. IQinn (talk) 15:08, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Most definitely the same. Dates and descriptions line up with Mark Wilson's account of Qasim's release in The Guantanamo Lawyers.--Joshuaism (talk) 19:02, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Mohammed Souleimani Laalami

message: The redirect Mohamed Mahzouz has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Mooonswimmer 15:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Mohamed Mahzouz]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Muhammad Abd Allah Mansur Al Futuri

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 04:47, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed picture 

message: This caption, as it previously read, contains two errors.  The first, and the rather insignificant one, is as follows: "...were held in a trailer the size of a large RV."   The reference given explicitly states in the first sentence that these reviews were held in "a double-wide trailer".  
The second is much more important, in my opinion.  In an effort to clean the caption up to remove the NPOV tag, I removed the sentence "The captive sat on a plastic garden chair, with his hands and feet shackled to a bolt in the floor".  The reason I changed this is that the source listed in the caption was about one specific detainee and not the specific subject of any of the articles.  In fact, the person described in that source is not named, so we cannot definitively state who was in fact "shackled to the floor".  I think that this (and the word "only" in the last sentence) are the grounds for the tag as stating these detainees were treated in a certain way that is not supported by citations is a case of a non-neutral point of view. BWH76 (talk) 16:35, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo caption revert
Talk:Summon the Thunder

message: Other novels in this series have been redirected to Star Trek: Vanguard since 2016. This page should probably be merged there too. (If you do merge, please make sure to also update the Talk page headers to indicate the articles is Redirect class.) -- 109.79.172.210 (talk) 16:09, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Mohamed Ben Moujane

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.   Geo Swan 04:28, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed picture 

message: I have removed the content fork, original research and the majority of the primary source materials from this article.  I have looked up the name of the subject on google, but found nothing of value aside from Wikipedia itself.  I would ask that we try to find secondary sources to support this article in the future if any can be found.  Thank you.  --Yachtsman1 (talk) 23:59, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article clean up
Talk:Muhammad Surur Dakhilallah Al Utaybi

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 11:55, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{tl|npov}} tag as per dispute on [[Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption]]
Talk:Musab Omar Ali Al Mudwani

message: Someone edited some quotes, to wikify the dates in those quotes.
I am a big fan of wikified dates -- but not in quotes.
So I reverted that edit.
Cheers!  Geo Swan 23:11, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  revert -- see talk 

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 14:04, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{tl|npov}} tag as per dispute on [[Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption]] 

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 20:13, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rough work 

message: I removed the "Identity" section with the "Captive  839...", there i no good reason or need for such a section in this article and it was dehumanizing and based on WP:OR by WP:SYN. IQinn (talk) 13:42, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identity 
Talk:Mustafa al-Shamyri

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 21:34, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rough work 

message: He was recently in the news again.  How big a spike did it generate on wiki hits for him?  Geo Swan (talk) 15:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  how often read 
Talk:Mustafa al-Hassan

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 07:57, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed picture 

message: This sections states: "He had not traveled to Pakistan in order to slip into Pakistan" - clearly an error but what should it say - He had not traveled to Pakistan in order to slip into Afganistan - perhaps? --Chickeninapram (talk) 18:58, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Testimony
Talk:Shahwali Shaheen Naqeebyllah

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 08:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed picture 

message: What is the source for the name that is used now? After carefully evaluating the sources in the article and multiple secondary sources from search results. I plan to move the article to Shahwali Shaheen Naqeebyllah. Any objection? IQinn (talk) 03:40, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved the page. No objection after many weeks. IQinn (talk) 05:43, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  move
Talk:Noor Uthman Muhammed

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 07:53, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed picture 
Talk:Power Rangers Zeo: Battle Racers

message: Disney didn't own Power Rangers when Zeo was made, so this game is not Disney related. It's 20th Century Fox (Saban's owner at the time) related instead. 212.50.191.46 13:24, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As it is based on a wholly-owned property of Disney (as much as Donald Duck or the Muppets), it is Disney-related. Video games can be related to more than one company. JohnnyMrNinja 08:27, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disney 

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Power Rangers Samurai - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 00:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress