lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:CFB Wainwright

message: When was Wainwright actually made a Base? According to the text, it was changed from a camp to a base in '68...but it was a detachment of either Edmonton or Calgary when I was there in RV 85: it definitely was not a base in and of itself. --SigPig 16:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: When was it made CFB?

message: Added an external link to the Wainwright MFRC, which plays an important role in CFB Wainwright.
Alindsay9 (talk) 21:17, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your contributions.Per WP:EL, external links "should not normally be used in the body of an article." WP:EL goes on to say if "the website or page to which you want to link includes information that is not yet a part of the article, consider using it as a source for the article, and citing it."Therefore, I've converted the external link to an inline citation. Hwy43 (talk) 06:18, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  MFRC 
Talk:Cyclone Vance

message: Generally, it's pretty good. One thing, though. A source is needed for the $100 million (1999 USD) total. --Hurricanehink (talk) 17:14, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on our current, more stringent grading criteria, I'm lowering it to start class. More ANYTHING would be good. – Chacor 15:55, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Damage totaled AU 100,000,000 (1999 USD). That doesn't look right; 100M AUD does not convert to 2000 USD. Cesiumfrog (talk) 01:17, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I went back and had a look at the original source via the Internet Archive and unsurprisingly the AU 100,000,000 (1999 USD) is wrong as the source says "AUSTRALIA (cyclone Vance) Tropical cyclone Vance hit northwestern Australia. Thousands were evacuated and hundreds of homes destroyed. Exact estimates have not been reported, but damage is expected to cost hundreds of millions of dollars." Jason Rees (talk) 01:30, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: Nice article, not too sure why TC Vance has been rated at Cat4, there is no doubt it was a Cat5, wind estimates are signifacntly lower than actual. Commonwealth Bureau Of Meteorology also notes TC strength maintained for well over 24 hours after coastal crossing - will add refs. Hoxygt 03:44, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your right, it's definitely a Cat 5 storm. I'll try to change it in the article. RaNdOm26 06:34, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Please do NOT remove it from the infobox. The infobox should have the SSHS equivalent as analysed by either the JTWC, or a conversion of 10-minute BOM winds. – Chacor 03:00, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Ok MY mistake as you can see I'm a mere beginner. It seems I was also incorrect to note that Vance made SSHS Cat5 status since its mean winds were too low. Out of interest why do all Tropical Cyclone systems on Wikipedia receive a SSHS equivalence rating? Is there history I could read on this? Or is it simply an attempt to provide an across the board rating system? Hoxygt 10:34, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the SSHS category is there so that the cyclone can be compared with hurricanes in the USA/Caribbean using the same category system. RaNdOm26 05:16, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, SSHS is just in here to provide a global equivalence.--Nilfanion (talk) 08:07, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hoxygt
Talk:Catch-Flame!

message: Removing the music-importance tag. 
Referring to the [Paul Weller] article, Weller has had two albums (one solo, one in a band) reach #1 on the British charts, and a previous solo album is a million-seller. As stated in the article, this album debuted at #17 on the British charts. We here in America are too quick to tag foreign artists/albums we haven't heard of. Shyland 16:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you, but I also agree that the article could use more sourcing backing up its notability. Kickaha Ota 17:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Arethusa-class cruiser (1934)

message: "Aurora completed without aircraft facilities, and had a deckhouse for accommodation in lieu for service as Commodore."
Specifically:
*"Aurora completed" completed what? "completed" is a transitive verb.
*"without aircraft facilities" The previous sentence is about lacking a second aircraft, so is this sentence about the first aircraft or the second?
*"accommodation in lieu" in lieu of what? Or is that phrase naval jargon we're expected to recognize?
*"for service as Commodore" A good guess is that the deckhouse is to be used only if a commodore is aboard, but that would be service for a commodore (the deckhouse isn't a commodore).
Art LaPella (talk) 16:59, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean?
Talk:Nu Delta

message: --HantaVirus 16:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to expand, but within the section at List of MIT fraternities.  Consensus has shown that individual frat articles shouldn't be included in Wikipedia, but this list is fine. Nationalparks 17:18, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion is in progress
Talk:Seizure types

message: Ecstatic seizure could be merged here.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:19, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal, ecstatic seizure 

message: I am currently working on revision to add 2017 classification scheme and edit this article as needed to be consistent with 2017 ILAE classification.  I will retain the older classification as it is used in textbooks and older articles..  Any comments? 
This is the revision: User:TMM53/Seizure_types
TMM53 (talk) 15:41, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision to 2017 classification
Talk:St. Marx Cemetery

message: Here in this cemetary lies one of the greatest man this world has ever known. Of course I'm talking about Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart.What a shame that this man's grave is lost to man. But to pay respects to this man is to pay respect his music. He treasured his music above all and we shall and must respect this.--70.233.3.230 17:02, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not an issue of "somebody bothering". Since Süssmayr didn't get an own grave (which obviously nobody could pay for), his burial site was not marked.--Suessmayr~enwiki (talk) 10:59, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right; I was mistaken about that. Double sharp (talk) 03:03, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Georg Raphael Donner is not buried in St. Marx. This is a myth created by Constant von Wurzbach. When the St. Nicolai cemetery was closed in 1784 the location of Donner's grave in this cemetery was long forgotton.--Suessmayr~enwiki (talk) 16:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Donner
Talk:Dr. Black, Mr. Hyde

message: This article is worded in a way that sounds like a fan's avocation for the film an needs to be rewritten as per Wikipiedia's standards.--Paleface Jack (talk) 00:17, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality
Talk:Atlanta-class cruiser

message: The SC Seahawk first flight was on 16 February 1944, Atalnta sunk a the  Naval Battle of Guadalcanal on 13 November 1942
I guess Global Security is wrong.
I would like to thank Oscar Himpflewitz for his help. 
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Pure Havoc (talk • contribs) 04:33, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 - SC-1 seaplanes 

message: Kirk, the changes you made are good and the new information looks correct and is valuable. However, the article already has a problem with a lack of specific citations. If you could add these for your new material (for that matter, for any o the old material!) that would be great. Yaush (talk) 14:24, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for cites 

message: Looks to me like this is almost at B-Class, but be better to see more than one source, and if the class continued in service after the war then it really should have a few lines on that to make it complete as far as coverage is concerned. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:36, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've seen the recent updates -- that'll do me for B-Class. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 21:35, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: "Photo evidence show that USS Reno's torpedo tubes had been removed by the time she was torpedoed on 3 November 1944." How was that possible? Reno used her torpedoes to scuttle USS Princeton just over a week earlier. There would've been no time to take her back to the States to remove them.184.1.69.135 (talk) 17:45, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Reno's'' torpedo tubes

message: This is a pretty messy article, seems to have been edited with enthusiasm but little sense of structure by numerous keen contributors.
Major issue is the 'Specifications' section, which does not restrict itself to the design specifications or as-built loadout, but enters the territory of in-service upgrades and modifications to armament. Before too long, it becomes a technical service history, two sections before the 'Service' section.
I recommend a thorough reorganisation of this article by someone with both the spare time to do so and the skills to do it properly. 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:6930:2215:8811:3490 (talk) 13:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There is also an inconsistency between what this page says on the Oakland’s armament and what the actual page of the Oakland’s says. Examples being the depth charges and the 20mm guns. 174.243.183.156 (talk) 18:38, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specifications and service
Talk:Bogue-class escort carrier

message: I was looking through old news archives for some details, costs etc, but so far I've come up empty. Using HMS Battler as a search term pulls up a bunch of articles around May 19, 1943 based on a United Press article. They talk about freighters converted into aircraft carriers which are exemplified by the Battler. Many of the articles say they were known as "Woolworth" carriers, for their five-and-dime low cost. --Dual Freq (talk) 00:34, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woolworth aircraft carriers 

message: Anyone know what those are? I can't seem to find anything about them. --UnneededAplomb (talk) 00:48, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rying controls? 

message: What is the displacement of these ships?  The numbers on the pages for the individual ships seem to be all over the place.
75.50.151.223 (talk) 02:26, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Displacements could vary considerably from unit to unit as modifications were made. The best you can do is give a nominal value (typically a design value) for the class as a whole. --Yaush (talk) 16:48, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Displacement? 

message: Ravager and Searcher are listed as Ruler-class on each of their own pages, and elsewhere, but are listed as part of the first group/Attacker-class here. Is one incorrect? Were they refitted from one class to the other?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:130A:20F0:ECE7:97FC:AF2E:2482 (talk) 17:36, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ravager and Searcher 

message: The range figure seems nonsensically high, even if it assumes that aircraft gasoline is used for ship propulsion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.181.74.97 (talk) 23:59, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Since you added the range, what was your source? BilCat (talk) 00:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've got two different books that list this as the range. I'll add it to the main article.Pennsy22 (talk) 17:25, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  endurance 

message: It would be helpful to have a comparison of Bogue-class with the Casablanca-class escort carriers, in terms of size, aircraft complement, speed of construction, etc. Pete unseth (talk) 19:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  comparison with Casablanca class ships
Talk:Sugar Hill (1974 film)

message: ;Opening credits
*Starring Marki Bey
*Robert Quarry
*Don Pedro Colley
*Co–Starring Betty Anne Rees
*Richard Lawson
*Zara Cully
;End credits
*Marki Bey……….Diana Hill
*Robert Quarry……….Morgan
*Don Pedro Colley……….Baron Samedi
*Betty Anne Rees……….Celeste
*Richard Lawson……….Valentine
*Zara Cully……….Mama Maitresse
*Charles P. Robinson……….Fabulous{also listed in opening credits: "Casting in Houston By Pearl Chason and Charles P. Robinson"}
*Larry D. Johnson……….Langston
*Rick Hagood……….Tank Watson
*Ed Geldart……….O'Brien
*Albert J. Baker……….George
*Raymond E. Simpson, III……….King
*Thomas C. Carroll……….Baker
*Big Walter Price……….Preacher
*Charles Krohn……….Captain Merrill
*J. Randall Bell……….Parkhurst
*Peter Harrell, III……….Police Photographer
*Judy Hanson……….Masseuse
*Gary W. Chason……….Lab Technician
*Roy L. Downey……….Stevedore{receives additional listing in end credits: "Special Effects……….Roy L. Downey"}
*Garrett Scales……….Crew Chief
*John E. Scarborough……….Uniformed Cop
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 18:34, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fine, but we do not format credits in Wiki articles based on how they are listed graphically in the film. We do not repeat credits or delineate opening or closing credits. Cast list is just the names of the actors and the characters they play. Please stick to standard Wiki formatting. If you are not sure, look at some other film articles here.Greg Fasolino (talk) 15:48, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Your attention to detail is appreciated and, continuing with the subject of detail, I assume you will not object, as long as none of the guidelines which you indicated is breached, to my repositioning names two through seven in the currently existing cast list. The new ordering will be in compliance with Sugar Hill's credits as seen here and here as well as with its listing in the authoritative American Film Institute Catalog.I am also making a couple of adjustments in two of the cast listings — the name of the title character is listed in on-screen credits as Diana Hill, not as Diana "Sugar" Hill, thus, I am enclosing the nickname in brackets, Diana ["Sugar"] Hill, or perhaps, if you feel that the brackets make the quotes unnecessary, Diana [Sugar] Hill.The other adjustment concerns cast member Charles P. Robinson who, in the currently existing version, is erroneously listed as Charles F. Robinson.If there are further issues regarding the revisions I have just made, please let me know, thus allowing for discussion of alternatives. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 18:34, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, all that is fine. You inadvertently deleted the character name entirely, so I fixed it. Greg Fasolino (talk) 19:33, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. I appreciate your help. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 20:28, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: For the record: on-screen opening as well as end credits indicating cast of ''Sugar Hill''
Talk:FORTUNE Battle of the Corporate Bands

message: Noticed that this same information exists in another article that spells "Fortune" in mixed-case.  Obviously, only one of these should remain, and the other should become a redirect, right?  Vandelay 17:22, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger?

message: The whole "$1 million bribe" story is entertaining, but it's an unsubstantiated rumour that has no place in this article.  But it is acceptable to mention Scrushy's and HealthSouth's legal problems. I've cleaned up this section in the "Fortune" (mixed case) version of the article.  Vandelay 19:18, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia
Talk:Visa versa

message: I don't believe that "visa versa" is a valid Latin phrase in this context. It doesn't appear in the full list of Latin phrases to which it redirects, and is found in no dictionary that I have searched through OneLook  (except for the Wikipedia entry, which is why I'm here ;)), reinforcing that belief.
It's almost certainly an error for "vice versa", IMHO, but I don't think "visa versa" should be allowed to stand as a Wikipedia entry as it is. AncientBrit 17:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Alfred Bruyas

message: There is a brillant Bruyas biography on de.wikipedia.org - How to proceed in such a case? How to link both? --R.P.D. 17:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made the link ... now Deutsch appears in the far left panel at the bottom.  We now need someone to translate the German article into English! Stumps 19:50, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Turkish Occupation Forces in Cyprus

message: A noble Turkish warrior would never kill innocent people or civilians. We have been a warrior nation for thousands years. We beat every army which tried to stop us but we never killed innocent people. We are simple, noble and brave but I am not sure that others have these... With respect, noble member of the Kayı Tribe, Deliogul 17:25, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full of false statements...
Talk:Fort Lincoln Internment Camp

message: From the wikipedia article List of concentration and internment camps is the following info, too much for that article.  Includes one inaccurate statement about peak population  (i.e. "peak population of 650" vs. "800 Italians" later, and vs. higher number in this article currently).  But it has other info not included (the CCC barracks buildings and brick army barracks;  about the Germans being only ones there during a period) and it refers to a Bismarck Tribune article which could be found and used as a source.
The passage from other Wikipedia article:
I imagine this is largely accurate, and that it was added to other article by someone who knew the info.  Hope this is useful. --doncram 16:35, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: info and source to add
Talk:Lichtenberg figure

message: Is lightning itself an example of a Lichtenberg figure?  According to the definition, it's when the dielectric strength is exceded, making the dielectric conductive.  That sounds like lightning to me.
Lichtenberg Figures are most often used to describe branching electrical discharges (or electrical trees) that have been preseved on the surface of, or within, a solid dielectric. However, during dielectric breakdown in strongly non uniform high voltage electric fields, transient Lichtenberg Figures may also form within gases and dielectric liquids. However, the nature of the gaseous or fluid media does not allow a permanent record of their passage to be preserved (other than through photographic means). Lichtenberg Figures and lightning both exhibit fractal properties. The branching behavior, and even the approximate branching angle, are common characteristic of dielectric breakdown within all forms of matter. Hence the similarity in appearance to lightning. So, very strongly branched lightning (such as "anvil crawlers" or J Streamers) could indeed be called HUGE Lichtenberg Figures ... Bert 05:49, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lightning 

message: could someone please add a sentence or two defining the subject at the beginning of the article? Right now it jumps straight into who it's named after and how he discovered it, without actually specifying what it is. Thanks! Luvcraft 16:50, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! I'll go ahead and take off the template. Luvcraft 19:41, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  insufficient context 

message: More information was added to the first paragraph. I'm also adding more references to help strengthen the veracity of the article. Bert (talk) 05:47, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for greatly improving the quality of the article.  Reify-tech (talk) 12:33, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding more text to beginning of article and references 
Talk:Jesuit High School (New Orleans)

message: Mid importance as alumni list good.
Adding more in-line refs would get this a B. More pics? Welcome Victuallers 16:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: Can anyone find a source verifying that Hale Boggs went to Jesuit? I've looked and I can't find anything.-- Deville (Talk) 22:38, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm removing him for now since noone seems to have the source.  If a source shows up we'll put him back in.--Deville (Talk) 21:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Actually, this link says he attended the "public and parochial schools of Jefferson Parish". -- Deville (Talk) 21:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hale Boggs 

message: Never graduated from Jesuit, so of course he's not an alum. I've removed him from the list of notable alumni. Whoever put that nonsense about him graduating in 1959 is an outright liar. He quit in 8th grade, after a priest suspended him for playing guitar raunchily. It's in his autobiography. Look it up. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.171.81.42 (talk) 06:04, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dr. John

message: These seems to be totally wrong.  The John Travolta article itself says that he went to Dwight Morrow High School in New Jersey.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Travolta#Early_career.  Does anyone have any arguments in favor of keeping it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pitilessbronze (talk • contribs) 04:34, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Travolta 

message: The section on athletics has the individual sports in a seemingly random order: not alphabetical, not chronological by seasons, not by general level of student and/or public interest, not by order of number of students participating. Is there some good reason not to rearranged them into some logical order? N'Awlins Contrarian  — Preceding undated comment added 05:32, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sports order
Talk:Andrei Minenkov and Irina Moiseeva

message: This page looks like a copy-paste of Irina Moiseeva. Only a few essential things are changed, such as gender and names. I propose for it to be merged into Irina Moiseeva under the new name "Andrei Minenkov and Irina Moiseeva" or something like that. InterstateFive (talk) - just another roadgeek 01:37, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Move and  Klbrain (talk) 17:18, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:The Thing That Should Not Be

message: The song wasn't really based on the "Call of Cthulhu" tale, but on "Shadow Over Innsmouth". I've changed the article to reflect this, and also added a few more links connecting the song to Lovecraft's work. --Miguel1626 17:35, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Is the tuning really 1 1/2 steps down? The song never goes below 1 step down and this can be achieved by a drop tuning instead of a down tuning. Countless tablatures say that it's in Drop D, but, more importantly, a Guitar World issue's CD video of Kirk clearly shown him playing in a drop tuning. Therefore: D minimum pitch + drop tuning = Drop D. I shall change the article accordingly. 74.13.146.26 22:11, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tuning 
Talk:Kilkee

message: Can we have citations for these? I'm aware of the Bronte connection, and Richard Harris, but I'm intrigued by The Beatles and Che Guevara. In any case, sources should be posted for all of these visitors. 
--Wastekiller 17:36, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've heard about Che Guevara being there before - I think he was going to and/or from Shannon airport or something. Dunno if it's true. --Zilog Jones 09:34, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous Guests 

message: can i add this link in the external links
http://www.360eire.com/360eire/Mumhan/ContaeanChlair/cillchaoi/cillchaoi.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dialinn (talk • contribs) 12:40, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because it adds absolutely nothing to the article. Night of the Big Wind talk 17:34, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panorama View 

message: Is Kilkee a civil parish? The Placenames Database says not. The name of the civil parish is Kilfearagh. Does we need a new article for it? Laurel Lodged (talk) 18:23, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civil parish? 