lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Huguenots

message: Notwithstanding what the NWO has taught you, far too much linking to France and the French. Yours, a Targeted Individual.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.5.88.45 (talk) 06:02, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: John Calvin was a Frenchman. The fact that he moved to Switzerland doesn't change his ethnicity, does it?Ernio48 (talk) 07:21, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The word: Huguenot firstly stemmed from Switzerland and not France 

message: In South Africa Huguenot origin is linked to darker colouring than is found in the generality of Afrikaners of Dutch or North German origin.
The bulk of Huguenots came from southern and western France, areas noted for darker hair than in the east or northeast of France.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.128.248.243 (talk) 14:51, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hair colour of Huguenots 

message: What is the actual ethnicity of Huguenots?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.161.200.5 (talk) 05:38, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: French people.Ernio48 (talk) 07:19, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huguenots actual ethnicity? 

message: Concerning the origin of the word: one of the possible origins given is the Flemish word "Huisgenoten". What I was taught in History class was that it came from Jan Hus, so the word would have been "Hus-genoten", which would translate somewhere between "Hus fellows" and "Hus allies". If anyone else has heard this explanation it could be added to the article. Piet 12:04, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: in Beowulf the word Huga means Frank, if you want to collect all interesting possibilities, or coincidences Fuficius Fango (talk) 11:39, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jan Hus 

message: Howard from NYC (talk) 03:30, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huguenot refugee relocation in 1685
Talk:1903 papal conclave

message: "he received 55 of the 60 possible votes". I thought the amount of votes is kept very strictly secret. Kairos 04:35, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As it stated on the above page that the process of Accessus was abolished after this conclave, there should be a mention of it here. Jackiespeel (talk) 10:50, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Accessus
Talk:James Stephenson (actor)

message: What nationality is this actor?
Courtland 04:37, 2005 Apr 6 (UTC)
Category Error: British actor, not American.
Comar4 08:00, 2009 July 11—Preceding unsigned comment added by Comar4 (talk • contribs) 14:56, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  (t/c) 19:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 April 2023
Talk:Meister

message: I have to disagree with inclusion of the American Pie discussion in this article.  It seems to be a too-specific discussion of a singular incident in a movie, instead of an example of the usage that the author of that paragraph intends to describe.  Additionally, I have NEVER seen or heard of "young Americans" referring to themselves as something-meister in reference to anything but their own name (certainly not money-meister or pick-up-meister as this article states).  
The popularization of the -meister name suffix in American slang can be traced back to the "Rich-meister" character portrayed by Rob Schneider on Saturday Night Live.  This character combined portions of other character's names with things like "-meister" or "-o-rama" for no explained reason.  This usage was far more frequently found in American popular culture than the Stif-meister reference explained in the article, as well as the possibly apocrophyal "noun-meister" type usage (and, of course, the American Pie usage is derived from the Saturday Night Live character I have described).
*I agree. Deltabeignet 23:15, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Rohingya people

message: I’m a Rohingya the thing which is missing is that it didn’t mention about our Arab ancestry. This information was passed down to generations. 
: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. 💜  melecie  talk - 12:19, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 January 2023 

message: They are not aryan they are Sanskrit stop lieing to those people were they not apart of a sultanate at one time with khan relations the others were called asiatic then Indonesian Giving impression that they are bad I think there's use to be what they called a Ba'al towards Bulgaria then bao wolf towards Germany Belgium then  bao means something different in Asian chineses language but towards Lebanon it become Allah Sudan Baha'i also means something different Babai which goes to wards Romania then to wards the other way they Romani  gypsie so I guess it would be blessing be to be in a house of a lord meaning those that would accept them so who was will to acceptthem those are all different so called lords Europe 154.20.52.238 (talk) 00:22, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Incoherent rant. Not entertaining. Yue🌙 02:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 May 2023 

message: There are many hyperlinks and URLs in the references section that do not have an archival link. Other editors, please make sure to add archive links from either Wayback Machine or Ghostarchive to all hyperlinks and URLs. It would extremely help in historical preservation and research. Battlesnake1 (talk) 17:00, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archiving links
Talk:Red and Anarchist Skinheads

message: POV, needs cleanup...oi vey Lockeownzj00 05:40, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Anyone got zine references?  I can tell the NYC stuff (and consult friends to fill in my blanks), but I can't remember where all my clippings got to (like newspaper articles on skins were ever any good...)  
I know there are a bunch of interviews out there: but I think my rambling drunken memories of RASH NYC wouldn't count.
T L Miles 19:06, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'll see if I can dig some shit up. 

message: I don't care enough to bother with AfD, but this article is clearly a candidate. WP prefers that the first paragraph of an article specify why a subject is notable -- this article fails to establish notability in any way. Somebody ought to fix that. See WP:NOTE for what is and what isn't notable. I am adding a tag. Eaglizard (talk) 23:40, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability?
Wikipedia talk:Articles on elections

message: Are all Legislative elections called "Parliamentary", even when they use a Presidential System, or explicitly call themselves "Congress" or something like that? 68.39.174.238 14:36, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why why why... 

message: Is any of this enforceable, or is it just an overview of the topic, and some suggestions about how to approach it?--Father Goose (talk) 21:49, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This smells like an essay to me, and I believe that marking it as a formal guideline would just be WP:CREEP.  SDY (talk) 22:35, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I'd say that it's more like an essay myself.  What I'm sure of is that it's not a style guideline, which is how it was previously categorized.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:22, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess it's just one we overlooked.  I'll mark it as an essay for now, since although it gives guidance, it doesn't look to be a guideline in the way that Wikipedia uses that term, namely a rule.--Father Goose (talk) 02:27, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enforceable?
Talk:John D. MacArthur

message: This reads like it was written by someone who owed him money, or worked for him. Given that some of it is sourced to the MacFound, that might be kinda true. Qwirkle (talk) 01:23, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The talk page is not the place for vague WP:IDONTLIKEIT whinging. What do you believe is inaccurate?  Toddst1 (talk) 23:24, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

text: The accuracy template was just removed. Any inaccuracies that existed I believe have been marked with a 'citation needed' and I added clearer cites a few months ago. I do agree some of the language is a bit praise-heavy, but I don't think that merits the accuracy template any longer. --Engineerchange (talk) 13:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy.
Talk:Omaria massacre

message: I removed the quotes around Islamic terrorists, because they convey the sense of doubting quotes.  An anonymous user reverted this change, reinstating the quotes, and stated that the quotes are original from a cited article.
Regardless of whether they were included in a cited article or not, having quotes around "Islamic terrorists" serves no discernable function in this wikipedia article besides conveying a sense of doubt about the validity of the term.  If something about the term is disputed, that should be pointed out perhaps--but not by quotation marks around the term.
--Ryanaxp 05:56, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
: Certainly the attribution of the massacre is disputed - as is the appropriateness of the term "Islamic terrorists" even by those who agree that it was done by the Armed Islamic Group. If this is not quoted, it should not be used at all. - Mustafaa 20:04, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bhili language

message: I've moved the reference section from the article, since it's obvious that none of them have actually been used to add content to the article. All of the current info can be found just by checking the Ethnologue entry. Please put them back when you've actually extracted some sort of info out of them.
References
*Jain, N. 1962. Bhili-Hindi kosh. Indore: Hira-Bhaiya
*Jain, N. 1971. Bhili ka bhashashastriya adhyayan. Indore: Indore University
*Kulkarni, S.B. 1976. Bhili of Dangs. Poona: Deccan College
*Thompson, Rev. Chas. S. 1895. Rudiments of the Bhili Language. Ahmedabad: United Printing Press
Peter Isotalo 23:12, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources but no info 
Talk:T'Pau (Star Trek)

message: * Oppose - it may be that the band is named after the character, but I would suggest that the band is considerably more famous - in fact, I'd not heard of the Star Trek reference until I saw this. So this is good disambiguation. sjorford →•← 08:17, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Oppose

message: Memory Alpha and a couple of websites say that another version of T'Pau (who appears to be played by an unidentified Oriental actress) appears in the Voyager episode "Darkling", yet other sources say this character is an unnamed Vulcan matriarch. I've never seen "Darkling" - can anyone confirm if the character seen in The Doctor's holodeck simulation is actually referred to on screen as T'Pau? If so, who plays her? We should make note of this additional appearance, not to mention that if an Oriental actress did play her, that sort of puts paid to the controversy over Kara Zediker's accent since the Voyager version didn't exactly match Amok Time, either. Thanks. 23skidoo 05:24, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: A holographic version of T'Pau was indeed featured in "Darkling"; but she did not speak, content to sit and play kal-toh against another holodeck character. She was mentioned by name by the Doctor; there's no doubt, it's all in the script. The acress playing her was not credited, though she looked closer to the "old" T'Pau than to Kara's portrayl. I guess it really is Cochrane syndrome. CNash 22:37, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: T'Pau on Voyager?

message: I swapped the image of the young T'Pau with the image of the older one from the original series, since it's more likely this is the image people associate with the character.DailyRich 19:26, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main image 
Talk:Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

message: There's a lot of original research and crap sources in the section. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 20:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fraud and abuse" section needs better sourcing 

message: I think the stub article Pop Train should be merged into the Water dumping / container deposit cashing fraud section. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 12:20, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 11:38, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge in Pop Train 

message: The “Criticisms of SNAP” section directly asserts that SNAP’s “history with USDA and connection with bills and legislation makes it a political tool more than a benefit system of good-will.” This is pretty obviously a statement of opinion, and it is not attributed to anyone. Most of the section reads like this.
Criticism of SNAP is fine, but it should come from outside of Wikipedia. Also, reasons for the criticism should be given, and phenomena should not be described as “important”. Wham Bam Rock II (talk) 12:54, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Criticisms of SNAP” section contains subjective prose 

message: Criticism section doesn't actually contain any specific criticisms of SNAP, and the first sentence is not W:NPOV. 2600:8801:710E:7E00:F024:7D1F:5210:BD59 (talk) 23:13, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: The entire History section of this article is verbatim lifted from this source.
https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/short-history-snap#1939 128.194.176.216 (talk) 16:32, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: US government sources can be used verbatim. Improved citation to clarify 〜 Adflatuss • talk 02:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism in History section. 

message: — Assignment last updated by Laguan0206 (talk) 22:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Global Poverty and Practice

message: All citations of the “Pop Train Scheme” link to 404 and look to have been the same author/story. There is no evidence this was a real thing. This section should be removed. Not sure if I used the right tag, I’m
new to this!Mpalley (talk) 13:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pop Train Section Citations
Category talk:Rivers of Hong Kong

message: *This category was listed for deletion on March 24, 2005. Consensus was to Keep. The following discussion took place and should not be modified.
This category only contains two actual rivers, of which the Sham Chun River forms the boundary between Hong Kong and Guangdong. Susvolans (pigs can fly) 19:42, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: CFD Discussion
Talk:Leigh Howard Stevens

message: Pedestal is spelled wrong...
OK, this article needs to be rewritten. Granted, Stevens did revolutionize marimba playing, but this article needs to be written with a NPOV. All it is is endless praise for the guy. Please fix this.
--MrWho100 02:46, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The 17 Jul 2006 version of this article was a direct copy of the article on MostlyMarimba.com. I reverted this page back to the next newest version.
- Zerstoerer 05:11, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright
Talk:Absorption band

message: --User:Haraldmmueller 15:56, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with "[[Absorption bands]]" - which redirects to "[[spectral line]]"? 

message: There's some confusion between this article and spectral line, which has a lot of the same information without immediately diving into the quantum mechanical details. This whole article could be trimmed down and merged, as there is some seriously lacking info that is contained in spectral line that you wouldn't immediately get (e.g., the "fingerprinting" analogy) from a link here (as there was from Holmium#History, which I just redirected). Reconrabbit (talk) 18:55, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion with [[spectral line]]
Category talk:Archaeological cultures

message: Some cultures are missing (e.g., Mississippian, Oneota), but how can they be added?  The edit function does not open up the list.
:Edit the page of the article you want to include, such as Mississipian. At the bottom of the article text add this: Category:Archaeological cultures. Save the page, when you come back here you will see that it has been added to the list. adamsan 18:34, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  How can this page be editied?
Talk:Gauge symmetry

message: A gauge symmetry is a mathematical symmetry over a manifold of objects.
Canonical variables
*Energy and time
*Momentum and position
*Angular momentum and orientation
*Voltage*charge and time -- find these
For voltages --  the arbitrariness of ground (electrical) at any point in a circuit is the space for a gauge symmetry.
For  energy/mass equivalence the zero-point energy is arbitrary, analogous to electrical ground.
The commutator between canonical variables is the kronecker delta. This serves as the definition for canonical variable. Ancheta Wis 07:20, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: This page is unreadable and generally poor.  Better to just cite "gauge theory" and leave it at that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevesimon2 (talk • contribs) 16:01, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Template talk:Semipolicy

message: Please see Template talk:Notpolicy for general discussion of this group of templates
moved from user talk:UninvitedCompany:
Given our current methods of classifying policies, I believe we may need extra classification, or we may need to rethink it. "Official policy" is clear. "Semi-policy" is not, however - in this case, it refers to something that is commonly done but that is subject to substantial controversy (see RPA talk). In other cases, such as style guides, it is something that nearly everybody agrees to, but that doesn't sound 'official'. Similarly, "rejected" can refer to something that hasn't gathered consensus, OR to something that has gathered significant consensus opposed to it.  Radiant_* 17:20, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
: I would like to see widely accepted semi-policy pages be voted upon and moved to the "official policy" category.  There are only a handful of these, like Wikipedia:Assume good faith, Wikipedia:Profanity, Wikipedia:External links.  There are some semi-policy pages that are really style guidelines and should be categorized as such, like Wikipedia:Avoid peacock terms.  Then, there are semi-policy pages that simply don't have widespread support, that should probably be moved to the thinktank or outright rejected.  Wikipedia:Autobiography, for example, has never really enjoyed much support, and it's such a small part of the overall inclusion/deletion policy now that we probably ought to throw it in the dustbin.  I say this even though I was one of its original proponents.  
: The remaining semi-policy pages would then be those, like Wikipedia:Remove personal attacks and Wikipedia:Sock puppet, where there isn't much agreement.  Some people continue to remove personal attacks and some people claim it's not permitted, and that's unlikely to change.  The pages are useful to contain the discussion of these issues in one place, and should remain, yet it's likely to be impossible to get much conesnsus on how they should be categorized.  My suggestion is to leave them alone, and modify the template text to match their status after moving some of the other pages listed above to more appropriate categories.
: The Uninvited Co., Inc. 17:58, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll add that perhaps we should have an "essay" category for things that are in the Wikipedia space that are really just the product of one or two editors.  We have a lot of stuff floating around that has merit and is useful in elucidating the rationale for certain cases, but that isn't really policy and shouldn't be treated as such.  The Uninvited Co., Inc. 18:03, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Timocracy

message: Ownership of property to participate in government? I was under the impression that Timocracy occurred when pluto ideal state of aristocracy became eroded by the military.-anggarda
This article should not be redirected from Thetes, it needs its own page.
————————
Thetes
Thetes is a social class in Ancient Athens (and Greece??) - and should not re-direct to this page on Timocracy - a Political System. The Thetes as a class predates the reforms of Solon. I mention this becaus this article is not really on Timocracy - the political system - but an essay on Solon's reforms and their similarity to a Timocratic system.
It is debatable whether or not Solon intended to create a pure Timocracy - certianly Athens evolved into a Democracy, while Solon's reforms opened poltitical power to "rich" citizens - power that previously was the presserve of the Aristocracy. 
The best example of a pure Timocracy must be Ancient Massalia (Marseille) which was rulled by 600 Timocrats selected by co-option from the city's richest citizens. To be selected each had have sufficient wealth, be married and have living children.
Jalipa  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.238.50.136 (talk) 11:36, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  comment 

message: I think that the Old South of the United States was an example of timocracy because—besides the hill-dwellers, or sand-hillers of the Appalachian foothills—because their society was almost completely based on who had the largest plantation. There was also a principle known as the "code of chivalry" or "cult of honor" based on the ideal of gallant knights and pretty women. However, this was not necessarily a form of government—but, in a way, this entrenched society of plantation owners largely controlled the South's respective state governments. (Discussed in Alan Brinkley, American History: A Survey" and its condensed form "An Unfinished Nation, in the chapter entitled "Cotton, Slavery, and the Old South" [ch. 11]). What do you think?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshuajohnson555 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old South as Timocracy 

message: What's with this capitalisation? "In Plato's Politics, a state in which Love of wealth, Property and power are the Guiding principles of the rulers" Is there a purpose to it I don't understand, or should it be normalised? 607 (talk) 12:27, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange capitalisation 

message: New Jersey is listed twice, the second should be included into the first (I suppose, but I don't know the context of 1807)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:1743:1100:7D2A:BA48:D64A:57E1 (talk) 04:13, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  comment - United States section
Talk:Suprematism

message: From the article: "Suprematism follows the ideas of Non-Euclidean geometry and fourth dimension spread by Russian mathematician Lobachevsky. In this view, each picture is a frozen image of an eternal movement of forms in an ideal space of n dimensions – no up nor down, no left nor right."
Speaking as a math student with no background in art history, this seems highly dubious.  Someone with more domain knowledge should really look this over.  --jholman 08:54, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In the same way an E# is different from an F in music 62.238.92.181 11:58, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: The only "suprematist" artist mentioned in the whole article is Malevich, the guy who started the thing. That doesn't exactly sound like a movement.
173.66.250.143 (talk) 03:17, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dearth of Artists