lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:O3: A Trilogy, Part One

message: This album is entitled O3 Instead of O₃. The subscript 3 is usually formatting, but there is an unformatted unicode character ₃. O3 could then redirect to O₃. I don't know how to do this. Can it be done? -- Chris Brack :P (talk) 03:49, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change Title from O3 to O₃
Talk:Odds & Ends (album)

message: "Odds & Ends is the unreleased debut album from British pop singer, Dido. The collection was put together by her management team, Nettwerk, and released in late 1995, in order to gain interest from record companies so that Dido could be signed to a major record label." --82.125.45.55 (talk) 20:49, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreleased but released?
Category talk:Stalinism in Poland

message: ☭  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:243:1C80:4850:F00D:7173:B45D:65FD (talk) 22:32, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Really no comments. Brutal, unprovoked, personal attack at its worst. M0RD00R (talk) 21:38, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, vandals exist everywhere, and unfortunately, leftist vandals are largery tolerated. Deleting this category is like deleting a large chunk of history of Poland. Hope this will not happen. Tymek (talk) 20:37, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia is free from neonazism and neocommunism ideology
Talk:Pure (The Primitives album)

message: The track listing here is for the cassette version of the album.  The CD includes four more songs:
* 13. Noose
* 14. I'll Be Your Mirror
* 15. All the Way Down (Beat Version)
* 16. I Almost Touched You
I can't vouch for the authorship of 13 and 16, but obviously 14 is Lou Reed and 15 is still Court/Tracy.  Asat (talk) 02:58, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  CD version
Talk:Ready to Rock

message: On the page of EP on wikipedia is written that the boundry between EP and LP is 25 minutes, so according to wikipedia, this is a fulllength album.
83.7.45.167 (talk) 18:36, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia isn't a reliable source. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:34, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's not an EP
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Religion/Unitarian Universalism work group

message: The discussion continues on the possibility of including the article Unitarianism in the List of Topics in Christianity. You can speak out on
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity/Core topics work group/Topic list#Unitarianism.  DayakSibiriak (talk) 05:31, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Topics in Christianity 

message: Hello everyone, I was thinking of getting involved with this work group, but I noticed that it looks kind of dead. Are there any active members right now? I was thinking I might start with some cleanup here at the work group itself. For instance, starting to archive messages here on the talk page. I also noticed that the "members" section on the main page is organized in such a way that the user would have to put themselves on the "inactive" list even though that often means they are not editing Wikipedia at all. I think I might just make the into subsections dedicated to year so an active user has to add their name every year and inactive users simply stopping adding their name. If anyone is still around at this work group then let me know what you think. TipsyElephant (talk) 01:32, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getting Involved 

message: The Edict of Torda, the first law to sanction the existence of a Unitarian church in Europe, is currently a FA candidate and it needs comprehensive reviews. Thank you for your time and work. Borsoka (talk) 03:46, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAC: Edict of Torda 

message: Our article on the Unitarian Universalist Association says that the seven principles were adopted in 1984 (Unitarian Universalist Association#Principles and purposes), citing to this UUA source: https://www.uuworld.org/articles/how-uu-principles-purposes-were-adopted?lj= . But a different UUA source -- https://www.uuworld.org/articles/uuas-original-principles-1961 -- gives the date as 1985.  I have no idea which is right, so I leave it to the members of the working group to deal with this. JamesMLane t c 05:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of adoption of the seven principles
Talk:Revolución de Amor: 2003 Tour Edition

message: I agree that this article should be remove or delete. I was the one who created this article without checking the right policy to do so. I have already move the information from this article and move it to the correct article/page of Revolución de Amor.  Manafan5 (talk) 20:08, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move or Deleted "[[Revolución de Amor: 2003 Tour Edition]]"
Talk:Rolled Gold+: The Very Best of the Rolling Stones

message: i came here trying to find out what this means on a piece of jewellery, this is NOT it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.20.79 (talk) 19:25, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  wuh?
Talk:Georgetown Little Theatre

message: Pshmagic (talk) 19:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Hello again, . I thought I'd respond here to your recent edit and why I thought to revert it (and remove two more external links).
First, concerning the five links under 'See Also'. You'll  note that two of the links, Community Theatre and Georgetown, Ontario, are redundant as they are included in the text. While I recognize Halton Hills, Ontario as the regional municipality in which Georgetown is located, I'm not convinced that its inclusion is necessary. The presence of a link  to Glen Williams, Ontario, one of many other communities  located in Halton Hills, is left unexplained. Finally, I'd argue that the inclusion of Theatre isn't really of value.
I trimmed the many external links per Wikipedia's guidelines.  The presence of these links is unexplained. Assuming that there is some relationship between these groups and Georgetown Little Theatre I should point out that amongst the links to be avoided are links to sites "that are only indirectly related to the article's subject: the link should be directly related to the subject of the article."
Again, I recommend reading the policy concerning conflict of interest guidelines.Victoriagirl (talk) 19:49, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: See also and External links
Talk:PDI

message: ----
HI, Just put back in protein digestible in the small intestine. It is something used and used quite often in Irish and French farming systems, Talk to me if you don't believe me. Thanks MacAodh (talk) 18:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

message: * Peripheral Decarboxylase Inhibitor, a medical substance such as carbidopa
* Personal Disposable Income, the amount of an individual's total income left after taxes
* Perylene-bis(dicarboximide)
* Philippine Daily Inquirer, a Philippine newspaper
* Plastic Drum Institute, a former business unit of the Society of the Plastics Industry
* Please Do Investigate
* Pre-Delivery Inspection, an inspection performed on a car, home, or other item to be sold
--User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 13:15, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Items removed due to lack of support from target articles

message: Pictorial Deviation Indicator looks like a possible article or at least redirect, see
* https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Pictorial+Deviation+Indicator%22 ( 4,070 ghits )
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jl29NPpEkT8
and is a meaning of PDI.
According to the youtube above, it's basically the same thing as a Course deviation indicator or Horizontal situation indicator. Andrewa (talk) 06:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictorial Deviation Indicator
Talk:Slania

message: There's a mistake at Track 8. "Slanias Song" should be written "Slania's Song", or am I wrong?
In the Booklet it says "Slanias Song", I know. But should we just adopt wrong song Titles? -- 85.178.138.109 (talk) 12:29, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sloppy Seconds (album)

message: You cited allmusic and said it was noted for its crude sense of humor...this is likely a lie..."Was" noted suggests that at the time it was noted for this...unless you have a source from the time period, this seems a little off.  I don't get people using allmusic for anything, seems rather "sloppy."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.28.160.153 (talk) 15:52, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Slowblow (album)

message: Is "Cemetary" the correct spelling of track 9? Web searches turn up various results − "Cemetary", "Cementary", and the normal spelling, "Cemetery".  If the track does have a nonstandard spelling, a  tag should probably be added. Nick Number (talk) 19:08, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cemetary?
Talk:So Far So Good (John Martyn album)

message: In my view, the very first line is in error. The track, "I'd Rather be the Devil", is NOT on any of the 3 quoted albums, though it was put onto a much later re-issue of "Solid Air" well after "So Far..." was first issued. However, I don't know if it's the SAME version. I am of the opinion that "...Devil" on "So Far,..." is from the "Live at Leeds" album (as it's a live rendition - NOT a studio recording), but I am unable to confirm. I can tell you that the "So Far..." version has Martyn backed by a Double Bass player (almost certainly Danny Thompson) and a drummer - probably Terry Cox. Thompson & Cox were the rhythm section of Pentangle.
Taff Hewitt (talk) 20:09, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'd Rather be the Devil
Talk:Redistribution (cultural anthropology)

message: From the 'disambiguation page", is this statement true? Since it doesn't say this in the actual article, I reverted the page to the previous 10:39, 22 September 2011 version. Please restore it if I'm wrong:
:Redistribution (cultural anthropology) in relation to non-market economic exchange of handshaking and dancing
Vandalism?: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Redistribution&diff=513529173&oldid=451826785 
Article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redistribution
Thanks, Wordreader (talk) 01:25, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  True or vandalism?
Talk:Coal-mining region

message: I don't see anything here that would not be more appropriately placed in either Coal mining or in the various "Coal mining in NationX" articles.  Plazak (talk) 02:13, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this article useful? 

message: Graphs and charts need to get new units, rather than the pretty obscure BTU. Also the graphs use quadrillion, which is pretty much meaningless. Please metrify and use scientific notation, so the maps and graphs actually make sense. 131.251.254.110 (talk) 11:27, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Unit issues
Talk:Outdoors

message: outdoors does not always mean wilderness. for some applications it means "in harder conditions than indoors". it needs some point.77.121.13.148 (talk) 19:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaning 

message: This page Outdoors redirects to Environment (biophysical), but I think that's not the right place. Outdoor redirects to Wilderness which has been mentioned in this talk page before.
I think it might be best to have a short article here, referring to concepts of the outdoors mainly by comparison to "indoor", and then linking to the various others. Outdoor should redirect here.
Rixs (talk) 13:54, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate redirection 

message: Shouldn't this article be about outdoors activities in general? I notice looking at this page's history, it seems to have been redirected to pages about outside environment and so on before being redirected to Wiktionary entry for this term. I was looking for article that talks about outdoors activities in general and landed here first. --Legion (talk) 18:36, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdoors as activities? 

message: I just retargeted this ambiguous term to Outdoor. – wbm1058 (talk) 15:53, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is an ambiguous, everyday word
Talk:Supergott

message: There has been a couple of unofficial Albums released by fans, and recently people want to put them here, but this article its for an official release Album from Caramell, information about fanmade Albums can't be here because it's self promotion, one of the wikipedia rules.
That kind of information should be in an external page, and made reference in an external link, but not directly in this article. So don't waist you time putting that info here because it will be removed, we are trying to keep things clean here.--Ruakuu (talk) 15:42, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  About unofficial releases of the Caramell songs
Talk:Qazaza

message: SWP maps calls this   Kezazeh, however in the text it is called “Kerazeh (It).-A small village of mud and stone at the edge of the hills, with gardens and a well.”  SWP II; p. 408 (NB not in archive.org), Huldra (talk) 21:10, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  SWP     
Talk:The Formation of Damnation

message: This article's background info section has too many quotes, making the section too large and hard to get any hard info out of it. Gather info from the quotes and make a summary of the important stuff. Quoting whole press releases doesn't really make an article. Also, the timeline presentation isn't all that practical either, now that a date has been presented that is what really is interesting to this article. Grinder0-0 (talk) 14:20, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed --ArdClose (talk) 13:18, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Oh, and I third this. 74.242.255.37 (talk) 04:10, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many quotes 

message: The Spitfire Collection pointed nowhere, so I edited it to carry on to this album and edited this page to point back to it rather than the 2001 re-recording album. Some bands' infoboxes only go through major albums and I can see doing that, but this was already set up to go through *all* Testament albums (as "First Strike" and "Live at Eindhoven" already showed) so I feel this is a sensible edit. Still, if someone wanted to go back through this as edit this to point directly back to The Gathering and have the whole sequence go through only the major original studio albums, I could see that POV. But it didn't make sense or link through the way it was. 74.242.255.37 (talk) 04:09, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album sequence 

message: I clicked on the allmusic review for this album, and was led to something totally different.  The review for this record was actually Christian-music based.  The review talks about "TFOD", but the track listing contains the wrong songs.  Should the allmusic link be deleted?Nahnite (talk) 21:37, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Review

message: I did not find about how the album was received by critics and the fans. Rankings and ratings are not enough. A few comments from important critics could have been added.
Prateekcertain  —Preceding undated comment added 09:27, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Reception?
Talk:Henry Stanley, 3rd Baron Stanley of Alderley

message: "He ordered the closure of all public houses and inns in Nether Alderley, south of Alderley Edge (Chorley), some time after he converted to Islam, because alcohol is forbidden in Islam."
Under what authority did he do this? --Jfruh (talk) 19:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The House of Stanley owned Nether Alderley according to Stanley of Alderley, probably until 1938 when it was sold by Edward John Stanley. — Joe Kress (talk) 02:57, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Closing public houses

message: He also succeeded to a baronetcy; maybe that could be listed here as well?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.1.74.1 (talk) 16:20, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Baronetcy

message: I think Stanley was invovled in publishing some Arabic texts, or at least one: Fiqh al-Akbar by Pazdawī. Anyone have any more info or references about this?--Aa2-2004 (talk) 19:10, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arabic works
Talk:MGR-1 Honest John

message: The appropriate infobox for this article is . -MBK004 06:16, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox?=

message: "Survivors"? How about "Surviving Examples"? Really, in this day and age the former makes it sound like a program of attrition was carried out against an innocent group of living organisms. I am not sure if this is a quirk of language separation, ie. British vs. American English.100.4.62.213 (talk) 14:10, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survivors?

message: See the following video (Source US Army) which states a range of 38 km for the MGR-1B rather than the 24.8 km listed in the info box.
Youtube 9nIGNezTQH8 at t=245  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dsmatthews (talk • contribs) 23:34, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was the range actually 38km? Clarification required.
Talk:Pleshey

message: I've uploaded a couple of picture of Pleshey Castle to Commons. As this article has a section about the castle, would either of the images be useful? Richard Nevell (talk) 18:41, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pleshey Castle 
Talk:HMS St Michael (1669)

message: Do the 1669 and 1732 ships deserve separate articles? How much did they differ from each other? Drutt (talk) 17:19, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe, one day, but the WP:SHIPS guidelines are that if the article is shorter than the infobox (and right now it is significantly so) then it should remain as one article, with the other incarnations of that ship being redirects to the main article. It's probably unlikely that there will be a vast amount to say about either phase of the ship's existence so one article is really all that's needed. Martocticvs (talk) 21:47, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:List of surviving Lockheed P-38 Lightnings

message: The newest addition to the survivors series is up and running (by the same author who brought you B-17, 
B-24 and the P-47 as well as others) enjoy Davegnz (talk) 19:29, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Welcome

message: *Support. It's best for consistency if the title of the main article is reflected in the survivor article. The proposed move will accomplish this. Binksternet (talk) 08:39, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: What should be used in the articles: Flyable (F) or Airworthy (A)? Most articles in the category use (A) -- Martin.bergner (talk) 10:29, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Flyable or Airworthy

message: RedBull has a in service P38 in Germany that isn't listed.  Stagr.lee (talk) 17:56, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RedBull P38 
Talk:The Anarchist's Wife

message: This is one of the worst written film articles I've seen. There's no references whatsoever. Who's to say this film even exists at this rate?--EclipseSSD (talk) 19:04, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't really understand why you added a "cleanup" tag to an article with a "needs cites" tag and then only specified that it needs cites. Could you explain if it needs something other than cites instead of just adding another stigmatizing tag to it? Murderbike (talk) 02:26, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Fine, fine. I will remove the cleanup tag, if it makes you happy.--EclipseSSD (talk) 17:30, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad
Talk:Cop and a Half

message: I have read that this movie is used as a means of tourture in The Phillipines. This is quite obviously false, and it will not be added to the main page until anyone can prove that it's true.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lemonsters08 (talk • contribs) 17:45, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: False rumor about The Phillipines
Talk:Boyana Church

message: Remarks on the Patron's Inscription of the Boyana Church, in particular section “3. The Wikipedia version, and progress in Unicode”. The author, , is much cited here. ◄ Sebastian 01:03, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scientific paper discussing our article
Talk:Robert Campbell (frontiersman)

message: Until I get around to writing the article and pointing to it with a disambiguation here on Robert Campbell (Frontiersman), I'll mention Robert Campbell (1808-94), a Hudson's Bay Company fur trader. He pioneered one of the HBC's routes from the Mackenzie to the (now) Yukon in the 1840s, establishing in 1848 Fort Selkirk on the Yukon at the mouth of the Pelly. 
69.37.156.125 (talk) 19:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See existing stub Robert Campbell (fur trader).  I bet this is your guy.  There is a lengthy disambig page on Robert Campbells as it is a common name.  WBardwin (talk) 03:19, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Thank you for your recent edits, 24.211.184.246  -- but a document/source would be helpful for a change of date of death.  The original article, and at least one listed source, show October 10, 1879 as date of death.  Do you have a published photocopy of a death certificate or a picture of a tombstone in your family archives?  Just me! (talk) 03:49, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: 24.211.184.246 added an external link to the Robert Campbell home.  The site's info confirms the date of death provided by the two original sources referenced  above.  "He (Robert) died at home on October 10, 1879."  Consequently, the date of death has been restored to reflect the 10th.  WBardwin (talk) 05:32, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Death
Talk:Madara Rider

message: I can see the man and his horse, the spear, the lion and the dog but not the eagle.  Could someone give some indication where it is in relation to the man and put that in the entry?Risssa (talk) 05:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is the eagle? 
Talk:Canadian cricket team in the United States in 1844

message: Is the $120,000 total for the bets in Canadian dollars or U.S. Dollars? Adjusted for inflation or not? A source would be nice, if only to clear up some of the ambiguity. GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 19:39, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering that too, so I've added a citation request. I wouldn't be surprised if it was US dollars and not injusted for inflation (huge amounts used to be wagered in those days) but it really needs a source. Lord C (talk) 15:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: $120000

message: Why Not  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.130.8.135 (talk) 15:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If your asking why it wasn't a test match - they weren't played for another forty years or so and neither Canada and the US have ever held test status. Lord C (talk) 15:56, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  test 

message: I rated the article as stub class today, mostly because the match details are so incomplete.  PKT(alk) 21:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article assessment

message: Did Canada win by 22 runs or 23? Article has both. AuntFlo (talk) 07:59, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Margin of victory?

message: Does it have recognition from the ICC as an official international? Grover cleveland (talk) 17:42, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: What makes this match "official"?
Talk:Hawk Nelson Is My Friend

message: I don't know how to cite, but here's the url:
http://www.cmspin.com/newsmanager/anmviewer.asp?a=4668&z=26
Jcpizzadude (talk) 19:45, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, you can find out about citing sources here. — Yavoh 20:23, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

message: has anyone heard the album? how can we be so sure of the genre(s)
where is that tracklist from? source?
well the first single, friend like that, sound as pop/punk as it gets listen to it here
wwwe.hawknelsonismyfriend.com
Jcpizzadude (talk) 15:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  genre and tracklist 

message: Anyone other than me notice the cover art looks like Fosters Home for imaginary friends art? Not exactly, like a paradoy  Mew Mitsuki (talk) 20:37, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover Art 

message: Am I able to delete this notification: "This article needs additional citations for verification."? It seems to me it has sufficient amount of citation... Srsrox (talk) 15:29, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes and yes. I deleted the page tag and tagged the one section that needed additional references. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:45, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "This article needs additional citations for verification." .... Does it? 