lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:SAMU

message: As a surgical resident at a Level 1 trauma center, affiliated wtih one of the United States's finest university medical centers, I do know from my trauma rotation 3 months ago and by taking trauma call, that the scene is no place for adequate trauma care. The OR and the SICU (or TICU) are the main destinations where definative care can be given, and should be given; the field is no place for this, and there is not enough space in French ambulances to carry all the required equipment that is instantaeously availible in the Trauma Bay of and Emergency Department. This person seems heavily biased towards the French method; this has further been proven by some medline source that their is higher mortality in this system than in others, such as Anglo-American systems. When fatalities per billion kilometers driven and looked at, France is always one of the highest, whereas places where patients are rushed to level 1 trauma centers (such as the US, Sweden, Israel, and Canada) have substantially lower fatality rates per billion kilometers driven.
-- You are looking only at road accidents and the "per billion km driven" ratio makes little sense in the geographical and social contexts involved. The French system is more expensive but saves more MI patients.
:* In France or Germany, the scene of the accident is not the place where the definitive treatment is administrated either (funnily enough).
:* French ambulances do not carry the equipment of a hospital. The thing is that full medical doctors are summoned on the place of the accident, where they can administrate a full range of drugs and even perform some emergency surgery -- as opposite to injecting standard drugs after requesting authorisation per fax to a doctor who stays back in hospital, and rushing an unstabilised victim. Rama 14:42, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is, the point is not "generalist doctor vs specialist doctor", it is "emergency doctor vs technician grunt when life prognosis is at stake, and specialised department vs emergency department when arriving in hospital". Rama 16:05, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: Oppose. An article about SAMU should be listed under SAMU. There is already a cross link from the other article to this one.--Hauskalainen (talk) 03:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: There is unneeded capitalization throughout. Capitalization is only needed for proper names and the first word in each sentence. The opening sentence makes little sense. Chris the speller (talk) 15:14, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed
Talk:Drzymała's wagon

message: Wouldn't Drzymała's wagon be the best name for this article? Van has a more modern meaning. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 21:01, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: "Van," as used here, is an abbreviation of "caravan," and refers to "a large closed truck or wagon."  Perhaps additonal historical information could clarify the best choice of word, between "wagon" and "van."  In either case, I think it should be the possessive "Drzymała's" rather than the adjectival "Drzymała."  logologist 22:01, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

text: I can't resist the suggestion that we should rotate the name of this article every 24 hours to each of the above names. A little late I know.Volunteer Marek (talk) 08:10, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Xx236 16:05, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No picture 

message: where the Polish movement was dominated by peasants - where did someone find that? Gonna remove it.Volunteer Marek (talk) 04:03, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  huh?
Talk:Hawkish

message: I hold the proposal of a merge of this article with that on Militarism for unlucky.
* First of all, Hawkishness is a stance specifically of Foreign politics/Security politics, and only figuratively useable outside of that sphere
* Militarism is, or can be, a way to organize a society.
* And militarist Doves are not at all unthinkable.
/Tuomas 12:36, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Double bass/rewrite July 2004

message: The double bass has evolved from the viol and or the Violone (although what exactly constitutes a Violone is a matter of accidemic debate) and of course the violin. Early double basses had anything from 6 to 3 strings. In the 18 hundreds the 3 string bass was popular (as played by Domenico Dragonetti and Giovanni Bottesini) the 4 String only coming into real promeniance in the late 18 hundres / early 20 Th century and the existance of the 5 String bass especially in symphony orchestras is now very common. 
(these next few paragraphs have been taken from the spanish and french pages, with no reference, so I haven't really checked them ... can anybody verify the information and give references please ?tradora 18:03, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Miroljub Labus

message: Pa ovo je glupost ja mogu da napisem i da je Sloba najevec sajentolog svih vremena!
---
Removing reference to Scientology.  Can't substantiate it. - Tεxτurε 20:01, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Representable functor

message: I think it is much clearer to say that a functor is representable if it is naturally isomorphic to Hom(A,-) for some A; which is why I rewrote it that way. I think the way it is written now obscures this fact, and makes the notion seem more complicated that it really is. The fact that every functor can be represented by a pair (A,φ) is important, but secondary. -- Fropuff 14:59, 2004 Jul 28 (UTC)
:My feeling was only that the natural transformation should be specified as given, because the functors have to be naturally isomorphic in that way. Isn't that right? If not, then your edits are how the page should be. If so, maybe something like '... naturally isomorphic to Hom(A,-) for some A. This natural isomorphism should be...' 
:If it was like that already, I apologize. I can't remember. -- mat_x 21:17, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. Reminds me of Yoneda's lemma. mat_x 08:00, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)

text: Yes, I guess they are pretty intertwined. I think we both have the same idea about how this article should go. I'm happy to let you make the changes above. mat_x 10:50, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition

message: "represented by (FX, ηX(•)) where X = {•} is a singleton set" is unnecessarily confusing notation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.28.92 (talk) 15:19, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing Notation
Category talk:Prehistoric mammals

message: Ummm.... where did the list go? All the articles assigned to this category have vanished. Any theories?    The Singing Badger 15:13, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: All categories are broken at the moment. See Wikipedia:Village_pump#Categories_broken.3F... Anárion 15:23, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Pontryagin class

message: The article says that the Pontryagin classes generate the stable homotopy of BO(k), I really don't see how that can be possible as  they are cohomology classes and not homotopy classes. I understand how the Pontryagin classes are a stable cohomology class in that they pullback from BO(k+1), so I think this is probably what was meant. --137.205.233.136 (talk) 12:15, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Stable homotopy

message: The entry starts by saying "Given a real vector bundle E over M...", but it doesn't say what M is supposed to be.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.189.157.194 (talk) 11:05, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition

message: It is not correct, that Pontryagin numbers are topological invariants. For example, an orientation reversing self-diffeomorphism changes the sign of any Pontryagin number. Also it is not clear to me, why Pontryagin numbers should be integrally invariant under orientation preserving homeomorphisms, when the Pontryagin classes are not. Rationally this should be correct.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:1398:9:FB03:B46A:C6B4:FBF8:3E6E (talk) 11:12, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Topological Invariants
Talk:Muhriz of Negeri Sembilan

message: By the way, the dates and ages don't match. If the prince was born in 1945, and his father's reign ended in 1967, then he would have been 22, not 18. DS 16:41, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:15, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Plymouth Laser

message: I don't think splitting up the Laser and the Talon was necessary, since the two aren't that much different. --ApolloBoy 22:22, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems 

message: I removed "Image:Lasers.jpg" because I have no idea what happened to it. It's still the same name and has had no changes to it. If anyone knows what happened and/or what to do please contact me. Bavaria 21:56, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I restored it. Karrmann 22:50, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Bavaria 19:53, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to Image:Lasers.jpg?
Talk:National Institute of Mental Health

message: Doh! Thank you, Icenine0! -FZ 17:01, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks

message: Although lovely in appearance and neatness, this article doesn't seem "to convey the important accumulated knowledge" and different perspectives on this topic in an NPOV way. It feels more like a NIMH webpage - perhaps reflecting the editorial history. In particular, the section listing every NIMH webpage on particular disorders, which would normally I think be under external links and perhaps just be a main hub page; and the long and intricately detailed history section. I'm going to start editing on this basis, please feel free to revert/discuss if any objections of course EverSince 15:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a little research and it appears that the author of the history section, identified as NIMHpress, at least for the first paragraph under the subheading "History", nicely summarized a longer (and exquisitely written) article by prominent history of medicine professor Gerald Grob, Ph.D.--and NIMHpress did provide the appropriate citation in that instance. I of course don't know for sure, but my guess would be that NIMHpress consulted original source materials to write the remaining paragraphs in the History section, but neglected, in most instances, to provide the requisite citations. So the good news is that there does not appear to have been a direct copy-and-paste from another source, and, given the accurate distillation of Professor Grob's article into the first paragraph, the remainder of the History section is probably well-researched and accurate. Most of the events chronicled in the History section were before my time, but I earned my undergraduate degree in psychology in the early to mid-1980's and my doctorate in clinical psychology in the later half of that decade, so from that point to the present I'm somewhat familiar with major NIMH initiatives, and I did not notice any glaring errors or inaccuracies. Mark D Worthen PsyD 02:43, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

text: Exactly right. It's a direct quote from the NIMH website. I'd love to see more original content but the best I could do tonight was properly attribute the quotes and take out an unsupported sentence. Mark D Worthen PsyD 02:43, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encyclopedic 

message: Shouldn't there be a section on this, which includes mention of the film The Secret of NIMH? --Daniel 02:01, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't see why not. Also, the NIMH features prominently in the Adam Curtis documentary The Century of the Self, where  it is described as an attempt to 'change' Americans into more rational individuals, and gets portrayed pretty much as an instrument of mind control. Damburger (talk) 23:28, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Seeing no objection here, I've added Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH.  I can't find any easily read sources for that documentary, but you might add it and cite the documentary directly. Lee Choquette (talk) 01:29, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  NIMH in Popular Culture
Talk:UCI Road World Championships – Men's road race

message: If you're looking to work on this article, some things it's missing that I was interested in: when is it held?  where is it held?  how long is it?  is it a 1-day event?  is it a flat course?  how long does it take to finish? When and where will the 2004 race take place?
Michael Rogers, Australia † ?????? --193.77.22.152 07:41, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Anyone know of the history of the U23 races?  Maybe it's up on the French/German/Italian wikipedia?  I remember Jan Ulrich won it years back. --Smilo Don 21:41, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here you can find some info in french(usually top3 of each competition): memoire-du-cyclisme.net. I hope that helps!-Drunt 22:06, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That site would give us the outline for the main page for most years events which would be cool. IIRC, U23 was introduced when professional and amateur were merged to become elite - U23 essentially replaced the amateur category (this must be 1996?). SeveroTC 23:06, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Got it going from Wikipedia/France.  Still needs formatting, but I have to go to bed.  Nice to have those medals up, though.  --Smilo Don 03:44, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of the U23 ?  

message: So I was wondering if we should split this article into something like:
*UCI Road World Championships, Men or UCI Road Race World Championships, Men
*UCI Time Trial Championships, Men
*UCI Road World Championships, Women (already splitted)
*... + plus junior & u-23
It's just a bit weird to have all this lists of winners on the same article. All of them could be linked from UCI Road World Championships and each one of those pages could have its own infobox and some text. My two cents. Drunt (talk) 23:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split this article in other articles
Talk:Madison Avenue

message: If Madison Avenue is used as a symbol or metaphor for advertising, wouldn't that make it a metonym?Tomsintown 08:13, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Metonym?

message: Why is Gucci listed before Dolce&Gabbana? And Roberto Cavalli deserves a higher listing than Gucci does. Why is it first? 202.51.17.250 (talk) 10:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Boutique listing

message: does this section add any value? it's just one sentance saying cars aren't allowed in the bus lane.. vote for deletion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.140.250.54 (talk) 13:00, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Bus Lane

message: How long is Madison avenue?!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miki Srbija (talk • contribs) 12:14, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Basic information missing

message: No ref to this song?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.118.39.10 (talk) 10:58, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not unless a reliable source says that it's in some way connected to Madison Avenue in Manhattan. Our article doesn;t say so. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:31, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Walking Down Madison]] 

message: I should come away from reading this article disappointed in myself for not owning property there, or in any case so enchanted with Madison Avenue that I immediately start looking up flights to NY and starting crafting a weasely story to get out of work for a week as soon as possible so I can get over there and marvel  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:12C1:44F5:C56A:DBF:74B1:5AB (talk) 20:38, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Your expectations are incorrect.  Please read WP:NPOV. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overall tone not slick enough 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fourth and a Half Avenue. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 06:51, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fourth and a Half Avenue" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: TBWA/Chiat/Day has left Madison Avenue. And they were the last ones standing ... 
See: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rob-schwartz-1bb630_first-day-of-the-new-office-last-ad-from-activity-7021094106802089984-MJVI  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1810:291D:3900:4D72:9D02:ED3D:6F61 (talk) 15:43, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No more ad agencies
Talk:Bile

message: whats the pH value of bile
:I saw the "Bile is alkaline" so I googled it. Bile has a pH of "7.8"  or "5 to 6" , and many other contradictory values. Best I can find is , a paper that discusses changes in measured bile pH over time. It found that the pH of common duct bile (7.50 to 8.05) is higher than that of the corresponding gallbladder bile (6.80 to 7.65) and that it becomes more acidic in the gallbladder the longer you go without eating, though resting slows this fall in pH. It references older papers: gallbladder bile 5.6-8.0 liver bile 6.2 to 8.5 Altman (1961); normal gallbladder 6.5-9.0, abnormal 6.9-8.0 Crawford and Brooke (1955) but notes these earlier studies made no apparent effort to control for air exposure or temperature change of samples. Anyway, given all this, the "bile is alkaline" claim seems false (well, OK, it is on average, but not always...), so I'm updating it. DewiMorgan (talk) 21:46, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: What is the pH

message: ... that needs to be addressed.  Large blocks of factual information that cannot possibly be common knowledge appear without citations—as do, in at least two cases, entire sections.  They are either plagiarized, or are original research.  The tag indicates a problem since 2011.  This is years.  Take action, this embarrasses the encyclopedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.179.245.225 (talk) 19:32, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The citation matter is a serious issue ... 

message: Bile or gall is a dark green to yellowish brown fluid
Does Bile consist liquid and/or gas, as the word fluid implies, or is it simply liquid?
Fawby (talk) 15:50, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fluid is not the same as liquid  

message: I don't think this article currently says how bile is produced in the liver ...? Grassynoel (talk) 04:58, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production of bile
Talk:Wild Fire

message: The da Vinci Project's home page refers to this craft as the "Wild Fire Mark VI" in their announcement regarding the date of its unveiling:
: ..."the Wild Fire Mark VI spacecraft will be unveiled at a public and media photo opportunity on Thursday August 5th 2004, at the Project's Downsview Airport Hangar."
However, a Google search for "Wild Fire Mark VI" comes up blank, so this might be the first and only time they've had the "Mark VI" at the end of the name. Because of that, I'm tempted to wait until after August 5th to see if that name is used at the unveiling, or if they just refer to it as "Wild Fire". If they do start using "Wild Fire Mark VI", a move is in order, natch. - Eisnel 18:21, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:C. H. Douglas

message: What was he a Major of? -FZ 18:30, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:American depositary receipt

message: Is ADR backed by existing shares(eg: the treasury shares) or new shares? If it is the latter, the company issuing ADR effectly get financing from foreign markets. Correct me if I am wrong.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.12.211 (talk) 15:04, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I am reasonably certain that ADRs are backed by existing shares of the non-U.S. company. Good question, and I'll see if I can find a source to cite.--FeralOink (talk) 11:27, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: How are they backed?

message: It took a lot of work to change the name from "American Depositary Receipt" to "American depository receipt", and change everything that links here. Unfortunately, it all apparently needs to go back.
It's not true that "American depository receipt" is the "more common spelling". When I enter both spellings into Google, American depository receipt gets 40800 hits, and American Depositary Receipt gets 77600 hits.
Google isn't case sensitive, so it's only comparing the spelling difference, -ary vs. -ory. However, looking down both lists of hits, it is obvious that nearly all references to American Depositary (or Depository) Receipts capitalize all three letters, even if it isn't part of an article title. So even if -ary vs. -ory isn't worth fighting over, we really need to revert the capitalization anyway.
Furthermore, the preference for -ary is much more than Google's 2 to 1, because the articles that say -ory don't represent the same ADR experience as the articles that say -ary. The SEC link in your External Links says -ary. The other External Link doesn't mention ADR's at all, because it's about foreign currency exchange trading, not ADR's, and it should be replaced with a major ADR site like www.adr.com. The New York Stock Exchange glossary says -ary (although they are carrying a news story that says -ory). The big banks that actually handle ADR's for other companies, JP Morgan, Bank of New York, and Citigroup, have extensive sites on ADR's and always spell them -ary. (Merrill Lynch says -ory, but only twice - to describe issuing a new index based on ADR's, not ADR's themselves). The sites that say -ory are mostly reference sites that talk about ADR's, and sometimes companies with their own ADR, but not banks that handle them for others.
Finally, let's consider organizations that are aware of both spellings and see which spelling they chose. You can find the JP Morgan site www.adr.com and the Bank of New York site www.adrbny.com with either spelling in the Google search field (perhaps to snag prospective customers who can't spell) - but on the sites they only use -ary. According to ,
Depository is "common but incorrect; it's depositary". The only source that verifiably knows both spellings and uses -ory is Wikipedia - for now. Art LaPella 23:14, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change

message: Maybe it is an example, but I'm concerned it might serve more to promote that investment than to improve Wikipedia. Detailaware (talk) 17:43, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dislike "Case Study" section as seen August 27, 2014
Talk:Seagate

message: Okay, we have two pages here about the same company, this one and Seagate Technology. I'm considering merging the info from this page into the main one. Also, there's a few places that also use the name (in particular a neighborhood of NYC near Brighton Beach), so I'm wondering if this page should be a disambig page once the move is done. What do you think? 66.106.14.146 19:16, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)