Talk:Princess Augusta of Great Britain

message: Was Princess Augusta of Great Britain born 31 July or 31 August 1737? Both are in the article. She is listed on July 31, but not August 31. genesee.gbh (talk) 17:51, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth Date 

message: this confuses Charlotte Augusta Hanover, Princess of Wales  with Augusta Hanover, Princess Royal of Great Britain and Ireland --Snottily 00:24, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong person 

message: Why is the title of the article Princess Augusta Charlotte? Any other website than the National Portrait Gallery and the English Wikipedia refers her as Augusta (without Charlotte), and every literatur (in German) calls her Augusta Friedrike (Luise). -- Greetz Sir Gawain 00:49, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: BTW: The image shows her mother Princess Augusta of Saxe-Gotha, see also  -- Sir Gawain 03:22, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For your first point, I've found plenty which say Augusta Charlotte... I guess what we need are a few contemporary sources... And, as for your second, I've left a msg on the Commons talk page... DBD 23:02, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi! Could you please post some links (let's say 2 or 3) to such pages, that refers her as Augusta Charlotte? Thanks! -- Greetz Sir Gawain (talk) 15:55, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:   to start, more later; busy, sorry DBD 16:47, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi! Thanks for posting the links, but I have to state that they are of no value. The first page refers to Wikipedia's texts and it's obvious that the page names the persons the same way they are named here. And the second page is no liable source, because it makes the same mistake that lots of other pages make: it merges two different princesses called Augusta. The first is "our Augusta" here and the second is Princess Charlotte Augusta of Wales (see the birth and death dates) whose picture is shown there. Any other (liable) pages (or even printed sources) available for proving the Charlotte naming of Augusta? Yes, I'm annoying ;-), but up to now I'm absolutely shure, that the naming of this article is wrong. -- Greetz Sir Gawain (talk) 23:36, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm getting rather the same impression (and even did when you first posted) – seeing as neither of us, after some effort, have come up with satisfactory sources, I encourage you to be bold DBD 02:02, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I was bold :-) But I'm not absolutely shure, that Augusta Frederika is the most common name for her in English sources, because the majority of my literature is in German. I also changed the image to a "prooved" one. -- Greetz Sir Gawain (talk) 15:09, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Princess Augusta, granted may not have been Augusta Charlotte, but I think we need some serious sources for Augusta Frederica before we can move her there... DBD 16:27, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

text: We'll also need sources for her supposedly being Princess Royal DBD 16:34, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added two liable sources. One of them (Frauen vom Hof der Welfen) also confirms the title of Princess Royal. -- Greetz Sir Gawain (talk) 17:07, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And your research shows a majority for Augusta Frederica over Augusta, yes? DBD 18:42, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, it does. But I've already stated above that (the majority of) my sources are in German. -- Greetz Sir Gawain (talk) 21:28, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong person II 

message: Royal.gov.uk – Princess Royal says that Augusta Frederica was patently not Princess Royal DBD 17:46, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted the cat change. -- Sir Gawain (talk) 21:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Princess Royal]] 

message: moved. --RegentsPark (talk) 16:24, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move (back) 

message: Schloss Richmond redirects here which is completely illogical. This place may have been built for Princess Augusta of Great Britain but this is no reason to redirect to her page, it makes no sense whatsoever. Even worse, there is no mention of the place in the article about her.86.180.157.184 (talk) 09:04, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The reply is a bit late now, since the palace now has it's own article, but: the palace is mentioned three times in the article (and also already was at the time you posted here). As Richmond was her personal palace and she lived there for 40 years and the history of the building is closely related to her and has remained basically unchanged since her death. So redirecting to her article made sense as long as this was the article which had the most information on the palace on the English language wikipedia.Alexpostfacto (talk) 15:41, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schloss Richmond