lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Joseon Sanggosa

message: It appears in Samguk Sagi. Samguk Sagi is most reputable source of Korean history.
It is also very weird that the nangnang state is merge to Joseon Sangosa.
Nangnang state is an ancient korean nation, and joseon sangosa is history book. 
In addition, the Nangnang state has acheological evidence. It is not mythical nation.--Hairwizard91 23:24, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is the Nangnang nation information really in the Joseon Sanggosa? I also don't understand why it must be merged with the lelang commandery. I see no significant connection. Good friend100 12:31, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Cathedral of the Holy Cross (Boston)

message: I'm surprised at how small this article is, for what must have been, historically, a building of immense importance in Boston.Iamlondon 23:29, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Cathedral of the Holy Cross (disambiguation) - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. 07:11, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: The article states that this is the largest Catholic church in New England, from a source from 1886. Another Catholic church, in Lewiston, Maine (Basilica of Saints and Paul), is around 60 years older, but is much bigger in capacity, height, and area. This church is not the largest Catholic church in New England, and uses an obsolete source.
Kingofawesome13 (talk) 17:22, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Largest Roman Catholic church in New England"?
Talk:History of the Jews in England (1066–1290)

message: Several of the passages of this text are derivative works of public domain material. I have placed citations first. I will look for the public domain marker to place on the page also.Jim Killock (talk) 04:50, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Derivative work 

message: Hi , is the single source needed? For context, although a lot of this article derives from a single public domain source, that itself was quite well sourced, although in an academic rather than Wikipedia fashion. Other articles (initially) derived from a public domain article are not normally targeted as insufficiently sourced. However, as people added more content, it became unclear what was derived from what, so I added references to make it clear. The article in question is cited at the foot of the article. Jim Killock (talk) 21:21, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the tag after glancing at the foot of the article and seeing multiple sources. I arrived here when searching on "the King's Jews", incidentally, the first hit was the book I assume is the single source mentioned. ~ cygnis insignis 07:07, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single source notice
Talk:Wooster Square

message: Technically, the pizza places and most of the great Italian food mentioned in the article is over on Wooster Street which is not part of Wooster Square, at least most of us in New Haven don't think so. 
Will in New Haven
:There is the park called Wooster Square, as well as the neighborhood called Wooster Square. The entirety of Wooster Street in in the neighborhood. --Polaron | Talk 23:50, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirect Wooster Street created. --Polaron | Talk 02:49, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: where's the pizza

message: A bunch of editors have been debating elsewhere when and where it is helpful to have separate articles on NRHP HDs, like about "Wooster Square Historic District", vs. when it is best to include the NRHP info in an article about a village/hamlet/neighborhood like the "Wooster Square" article.
Some of the editors (me included) agree that for Wooster Square and Wooster Square HD we currently want a merged article.  But if there is someone who wants to make a decent separate article, that would be okay too.  We just ask, please don't split out a separate NRHP HD article unless
a) you have created or are actively developing a DYK-equivalent length starter article using substantial information, and
b) you judge in good faith that it is beneficial to have the NRHP HD be a separate article.
Note, for all CT NRHPs, a good source is available, the NRHP nomination document, provided free of charge upon email request to nr_reference (at) nps.gov.  And, in December 2010, the National Register has just made available online copies of almost all of the NRHP documents for CT:  see search screen here.  I added a reference link to the Wooster Square Historic District's NRHP nom doc to this article, already.
Currently, "Wooster Square Historic District" is set to redirect to "Wooster Square".  (Equivalent notice being placed at Talk:Wooster Square Historic District.) --doncram (talk) 16:27, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: While it is true that this article has material that is not germane to the historic district, the historic district article content would almost all be germane to this one.  For example, the history section here would probably be virtually duplicated in the historic district.  Given that the historic district appears to encompass most of the geographic area of the neighborhood, I don't see why they ought to be separated.   can be embedded in other infoboxes; it does not need to lead. (By the way, when you split, you didn't update the talk page banners of either article, or the categories of this article.) Magic♪piano 20:54, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate NRHP HD article or not
Talk:Emsdetten

message: I'm pretty sure I've seen the "Angry German Kid" before - as far as I remember, it is basically a cutout from a "Nanny"-Style TV production. Is there any proof this originated in 2006? --93.194.255.189 (talk) 18:33, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article, dated November 29, 2006, tells a lot. Translated, the intro says:"Nothing has moved us more the last days than the horrible madman in Emsdetten. The whole media landscape in Germany took up the issue but misunderstood it several times."Another paragraph says:"Focus-TV and Pro7 got it all wrong, something which already began in the introduction of their news item, and something which reached its climax in the video contribution "Focus-TV killer games and the madman from Emsdetten", in which they, among others, showed a contribution from "Leopold", who was supposedly secretly filmed by his father. Leopold was an internet addict and was brought to a clinic because of this. The video contribution of the addicted Leopold is dramatically shown in the background."So the video *was* broadcast on German television. I'm not sure what the "Nanny-Style TV production" you refered to is, but perhaps this is what you meant? During the interview in that article, Leopold said that he did gave Focus-TV permission to broadcast his video. But he did not know that they were going to present it as if it was real. Cheers, Face 14:40, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The part about the "Angry German Kid" has to be removed. The video has nothing to do with the shooting. The guy in it was famous in Germany in early 2006 as "Der echte Gangster" (The real gangster) as he called himself. He created several comedy videos in which he acted like a "gangster" and uploaded them on some funvideo sites. The video we are talking about is also from that time and long before the shooting in Emsdetten. Even the translated version was uploaded on YouTube months before. --89.15.55.57 (talk) 19:22, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, you're right. The article just seemed to imply that the Angry German Kid video was inspired by the Emsdetten shooting, but I see now that that's impossible. Just for the record: here is the paragraph before it was removed. Cheers, Face 17:53, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Angry German Kid
Talk:Air Medal

message: According to the description it appears that the award can be made to those "serving in or with" US forces. I would be interested to know if this is just "lawyer speak" for "in" or if the medal has been awarded to those outside US armed forces. Rich Farmbrough, 17:13, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This came up when I was doing the EO related stuff over on Wikisource and I was shown/told at the time that members of the Canadian, Aussie and Brit forces have indeed recieved this medal. Only one RAF member is clearly listed further down as best as I can tell however.  -- George Orwell III (talk) 17:35, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ... also recall something about woman pilot who shuttled planes from factories to ports something like a kagillion times during the war but not sure if it was this citation she/they recieved or even if the story was 100% true for that matter. -- George Orwell III (talk) 17:39, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Aussie crew chief awarded the Air Medal . Aussie vets awarded the Air Medal  EricSerge (talk) 18:12, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Non military and non-US awardees
Talk:World War I Victory Medal (United States)

message: ?????Navy Battle Clasps??????Franco aq (talk) 19:47, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Navy Battle Clasps

message: How do I add images of an actual US Army medal? I tried the photo loader and can't make it work. Please help. I have photos of my great grandfather's medal front and back I'd like to post. The scan image displayed on the site is incomplete. Thank you. Bree25 (talk) 17:51, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Bree there are both obverse and reverse images available on Commons, you can find them here .  If you are able to take better quality pictures than those available I would encourage you to add them there.  However, the usage of the line drawing of the medal is often the clearest at showing the details of the design.  Cheers.  EricSerge (talk) 19:46, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

text: Eric, Thank you for your reply. I looked at the images and most of them are not for the US Army. They are instead for the US Navy. The US Army has a longer ribbon and attached the bars for each battle or campaign the soldier participated in. There are no examples of the clasps or bars on the commons pages. All examples are missing clasps or never had them to begin with. The line art drawing is missing clasps and not a good example of what it looked like in real life. If you look at it you will see there zero clasps so it is not a good example of what was sent to the soldiers. The medal that belonged my Great Grandfather has five clasps with double names on four of the clasps. There is no line art available for the back view of this medal. The back is highly detailed and very beautiful. I uploaded images of the medal front and back plus the box it was shipped in, but there was no category for WW I Victory Medal so I put them in WWI, WW1, WW I, Medals, WWI Medals and places like that. I didn't know where else to store them. Now that they are uploaded I have no idea how to put them onto the WW I Victory Medal page. 75.58.224.103 (talk) 19:38, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: images

message: The section on the Design of the medal has the following description for the reverse side "The top of the staff has a round ball on top and is winged on the side. The staff is on top of a shield" and the image associated shows a fasces, not a staff. Should this be changed? or is there reason to believe that the designers intended the image to depict a 'staff'? 2603:9008:1501:33F1:5473:9C6E:AB9A:44F4 (talk) 07:59, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Design of the medal
Talk:Asiatic–Pacific Campaign Medal

message: This article failed B-class for several reasons. First, it is devoid of in-line citations. It does have an illustration of the medal, but it needs a  to pass #5. It also needs at least one section header of content. Parsecboy (talk) 21:02, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: MILHIST B-class checklist
Talk:John Jay High School (Hopewell Junction, New York)

message: This article definitely does not conform to WP:NPOV. The unsourced statement "There have been some instances in which it is proven that the school has been wasting its tax dollars on arguably useless equipment: the school, for example, would use tax dollars on double-doors which are randomly placed in the hallways, as well as security cameras when the school claims it does not have enough tax money for necesities like desks for every student. The security cameras themselves are rumored to have cost somewhere around $5000 each and had the power to see well across school grounds to clearly see the patrons inside the Dunkin Donuts bakery and surrounding plaza, would be atrocious to call a neutral point of view so that right there qualifies a NPOV tag, any comments?--English836 02:36, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 
Talk:Love and Other Catastrophes

message: Since when were the Velvet Underground an Australian band? – iridescent 16:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Velvet Underground?
Talk:Cultural Judaism

message: Can this section be removed, at least temporarily? It is not sourced, except for the dead link. And it is focussed on just one "example", namely that of kashrut. Is the reader supposed to derive the lesson from this example that what applies to "kashrut", applies to all other areas of observance in Judaism? Is any source asserting this? Bus stop (talk) 17:47, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that this example section is not supportable by any movement or stream of Judaism or any Jewish community, it appears to read just how one secular Jew decides what he will cherry pick in calling Jewish living. Chana Maven (talk)Chana Maven  —Preceding undated comment added 16:46, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The "Example" section has been removed. Bus stop (talk) 19:13, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example section 

message: The recent tagging the article seems to be a drive-by tagging, as I can find no previous edits by this person on either article. Editor2020 (talk) 20:34, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Therefore, and given that there has been no subsequent support, merge proposal closed (no merge). Klbrain (talk) 10:45, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Guy Ritchie's Gamekeeper

message: :
:
Please discuss which image (one, both, or neither) should be used in the article. - jc37 05:37, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Why isn't this article titled at just Gamekeeper (comic book)? Isn't the Guy Ritchie bit just the attribution that happens to be stated on the cover? PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 09:54, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:United Nations Service Medal Korea

message: The information pertaining to the UN Commendations given to UN observers during the Israel-Hezbollah conflict does not belong in this article. Whilst it is an interesting side point, it has nothing to do with the UN Service Medal-Korea. I believe that it should be removed. What does anyone else think? AustralianRupert (talk) 02:33, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it does not belong in the article, so I moved it here.  That way if we can find a logical place to work it in, then it will be easily found.  EricSerge (talk) 03:28, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Unrelated information

message: The infobox currently has "None" in the entry for Clasps, causing it to show up as "Clasps = None".  Shouldn't it either A) be blank - so that it doesn't show at all, or B) be "Korea" since the medal always comes with a Medal Bar reading "Korea" in the respective language?  I'm not sure the distinction between a Medal Bar and a Campaign Clasp (in fact I note that the Wikipedia link for Campaign clasp redirects to Medal bar) so I'm not sure if it should be A or B, but having it read "None" is misleading.  I'll change it to be blank (option A) for now, but should it read "Korea" (option B)? Gecko G (talk) 01:34, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clasps = "None" ? 
Talk:Rutgers School of Environmental and Biological Sciences

message: Cook College is changing its name to School of Environmental & Biological Sciences. The home page has a link to a  page about the transition. Jsbillings 00:03, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually the transition page has moved. Jsbillings 13:20, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page should really be renamed, and updated about the name change. I'd be willing to make the changes. The transition page and letter from the executive dean has a lot of information about the update. It sounds like the "School" will change its name, but it will still be on Cook Campus. I imagine this is going to be forever confusing. Jsbillings 13:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe 'Cook College' could be a disambiguation link for the SEBS page? Jsbillings 23:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: God no. —ExplorerCDT 00:06, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cook College renamed as School of Environmental & Biological Sciences
Talk:Presidential Unit Citation (South Korea)

message: Seeing as how this page concerns the KOREAN Presidential Unit Citation and the Dutch Battalion talks only of receiving the US PUC I suggests it be moved to the appropriate article.Dmanrock29 (talk) 11:51, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like who ever added it got confused about the specifics.  That specific case got the Regiment Van Heutsz a US PUC, but other elements of the NDVN, both army and navy, did get Korean PUC's.  A good source seems to be the Vereniging van Oud Korea Strijders. Gecko G (talk) 02:23, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Relevance of Dutch Battalion
Talk:Swan (manga)

message: Created this page October 2006. Needs some work on the character and story section. I remember a Russian teacher, but not his name. If someone more familiar with the series could add a few things and polish off the plot and character section, that would be nice. Some more information on its intial publication would be nice as well.
Nervaya 00:06, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *ANN : Jason Thompson
--KrebMarkt (talk) 20:40, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s)
Talk:European–African–Middle Eastern Campaign Medal

message: Colored bands representing Germany (on the ribbon's right side), Italy (on the ribbon's left side), and the United States (in the center of the ribbon) are visible in the ribbon.
I think the author confused the sides of the ribbon. On the right side of the ribbon, for an observer the left side, are the Italian colors green, white and red representing Italy. On the left side of the ribbon, for an observer the right side, are the Prussian colors black and white representing Germany.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.221.34.39 (talk) 21:02, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Represented Countries 

message: YahwehSaves (a.k.a. 75.79.31.20), it appears you're trolling quite a few pages & creating edit wars. You've been warned, numerous times previously, about making such disruptive edits. If you wish your edits to take effect, you must: 1) Log in. 2) Follow thepolicies & guidelines, manual of style, and understand good faith. 3) Adhere to the agreed consensus of the article. As for the confusion with Matt Urban's accoutrements. Here's some clarity specific to the European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal:
* European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal – The Institute of Heraldry displays the Service Star to be awarded to the European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal (as well as various others), IAW paragraph c, section 13 (European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal), chapter 5 (Service Medals and Service Ribbons) of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), "One bronze service star is authorized for each campaign under the following conditions:"
:Campaign stars, though used as slang to describe Service stars, are used to denote US Navy Star Awards (thus the redirection to the specific Wikipedia article). See also Army Regulation 670-1 (Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and Insignia). Bullmoosebell (talk) 21:47, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:DE|Disruptive edits]] by [[User:YahwehSaves|YahwehSaves]] (a.k.a. [[User:75.79.31.20|75.79.31.20]])
Talk:Pearl Harbor Commemorative Medal

message: A fine start, and an interesting subject. Please provide references, though. Also, I'm afraid I do not quite follow the logic of the final paragraph; veterans have to apply for it, and therefore it is an official military decoration? The implied cause and effect seems odd to me. Maybe this needs just a little bit of rephrasing. Thank you. LordAmeth 08:43, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree about the conclusion drawn that it is ipso facto a military award. Furthermore, the law was amended to allow civilians to receive the award. About references--for the time being the statutes cited serve as references.--Nyctc7 (talk) 22:06, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: WPMILHIST Assessment

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 17:55, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Talk:Franklin High School (Livonia, Michigan)

message: I have noticed increased activity by FHS students in the past week. Much of it was either vandalism or the addition of original research material with no reliable sources.  I would like to remind those students that any edit that violates Wikipedia policy will be reverted.  That said, I encourage students to make constructive edits that improve the article.  The article lacks a history section and an academic section.  Adding those sections, with sources, would go a long way in improving the article.  Coaster1983 04:26, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent Activity by current FHS students
Talk:Wound Chevron

message: My Grandfather's discharge papers from 1920 show he was wounded in action and it was stamped that he received a Silver Victory Button.   While there is no WP article on this, there are other articles on the internet with pictures and descriptions of it, and it was issued to wounded soldiers in WWI.   Another reference says that the US only started issuing Purple Hearts to WWI wounded veterans starting in 1932.   Could it be that that to receive the Purple Heart, the veterans had to exchange BOTH the Wound Chevron AND the Silver Victory Button?    (I cannot find Gramp's Silver Victory Button nor Wound Chevron, which leads me to ask this.)  I have a picture of a Silver Victory Button from another website but cannot seem to insert it here.
--71.10.145.116 (talk) 21:45, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exchange Silver Victory Button for Purple Heart also?
Talk:Alien War

message: This article is about a event and company. It had a large budget and official license from 20th Century Fox to use the "Alien" film series IP. It ran for several years. It may not have taken place in the United States but that is no reason to question the article's notability. It already had several secondary sources cited in External Links. I have added further newspaper links and removed the tag.
Pug50 (talk) 18:20, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Notability Tag

message: I've taken that out for now because there's no ref, but it does seem like they're downplaying any connection to the movies right now. Any more solid info would be appreciated. 137.195.68.169 (talk) 15:37, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a no then. (Fix pig latin to see the link) 137.195.68.169 (talk) 15:42, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New experience and relation to the film series
Talk:702 discography

message: It was announced that on an April 2003 episode of Soul Train (while promoting the album Star) that the group had two Platinum albums, not Gold. They had sold just 2 million albums in the US alone.
No, they did not. They went Platinum..They only sold 3 Million albums all together. and STAR was a commercial failure!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.212.89.145 (talk) 04:30, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 702's album sales