Talk:Department of Defence (Australia)

message: With the passage of time the section on Wikipedia WikiScanner controversy looks to be unnecessary, both in part as a self-reference to Wikipedia and as meeting WP:UNDUE - any thoughts?--Matilda talk 23:29, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Nice work getting rid of it. --Nick Dowling (talk) 09:09, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - covered in context at WikiScanner --Melburnian (talk) 09:27, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:Undue - Wikipedia WikiScanner controversy

message: :Image:Department of defence.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Department of defence.gif

message: I have deleted all but the Secretary from the Department executive list. I think this is appropriate as it is consistent with other pages, not just other departments, but also corporations, for example Commonwealth Bank. Further, the positions change often. 
If a consensus is reached that other users believe including this information is appropriate, then I would suggest it should not be in the side-bar and article space is the place to do it.
What do others think?
Clare. (talk) 10:04, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with this. Deputy secretaries and equivalent hold important posts, but we don't need to name them (and doing so would be something of a maintenance issue given that there's a steady turnover). Anyone looking for this information can easily find it on the departments' websites. Nick-D (talk) 10:10, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Department executive

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Department of Defence (Australia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131110095906/http://pmtranscripts.dpmc.gov.au/browse.php?did=16752 to http://pmtranscripts.dpmc.gov.au/browse.php?did=16752
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Department of Defence (Australia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131110145443/http://pmtranscripts.dpmc.gov.au/browse.php?did=7330 to http://pmtranscripts.dpmc.gov.au/browse.php?did=7330
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131101004511/http://pmtranscripts.dpmc.gov.au/browse.php?did=18051 to http://pmtranscripts.dpmc.gov.au/browse.php?did=18051
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141220082849/http://pmtranscripts.dpmc.gov.au/browse.php?did=18795 to http://pmtranscripts.dpmc.gov.au/browse.php?did=18795
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:51, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:23, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: Is Defense spelled the modern way "defense" or the anachronistic way "defence"? 203.46.132.214 (talk) 06:27, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we clarify spelling?