lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cyrus of Alexandria

message: This page lists the year of St. Sophronius's death as 637. All other sources I have seen - including the Wikipedia page on St. Sophronius - list it as 638. - BALawrence 21:23, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi User:BALawrence, it has been a while, but I just fixed this. Thanks, GreyGreenWhy (talk) 16:17, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: So the original article was copied from the catholic encyclopedia which of now out of copyright and can be found online here. If that's reliable then the whole article can be sourced to it, but I doubt it is. I've sourced what I can to articles online but there's still a lot left unsourced. GreyGreenWhy (talk) 15:07, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing
Talk:The Gods Must Be Crazy II

message: Removed the line "It was shot in 1981, but was not released until 1988." This is demonstrably false as the opening scenes show an IBM PC compatible computer with 3.5 inch floppy drives. Although the 3.5 inch format was used by the Apple Macintosh in 1984 they were not standard on PC clones until after the IBM PS/2 in 1987. It's also obvious from other cues such as the Western characters' clothes and hairstyles that this was a late-80s, not early-80s movie, but the disk drive is the dead giveaway.
Natecull (talk) 07:55, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: good catch. CarlSerafino (talk) 09:47, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Early in the film – in the same scene in which we see the anachronistic computer – we hear Ann Taylor's secretary say that the conference is to be held in Okakarara, which is a real place (although she says that that is in "Africa" and doesn't mention the country that it's in, Namibia). I don't know whether any of the film actually was made there. The clinic grounds look a bit lush for it to be in Okakarara, but I wonder whether this should be included in the article. Kelisi (talk) 17:05, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  <Bush clinic's location
Category talk:Fictional avatars

message: Should there be a separate category for the Phoenix Force avatars? --JB Adder | Talk 06:49, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phoenix subcat 

message: See Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 5#Category:Avatar characters in video games. – Fayenatic London 21:05, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video game characters category deleted
Talk:Taraxippus

message: which taraxyppos her refers to? `'mikka 06:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pausanias

message: Quotations from books are not copyright violations. It is done everywhere in the world. `'mikka 17:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, however, proper acknowledgemnt is always required. The author or translator needs to be named - surely, the person who typed these quotes could add that in, it is pretty sloppy not to. --Theranos 21:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotations

message: I came here because in Greg Egan's Perihelion Summer (2019) a black hole that passes through the Solar System, disturbing the cycles of the planets, is named Taraxippos. —Tamfang (talk) 01:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  in modern use
Talk:MLS All-Time Best XI

message: First off, Armas isn't a defender, and second, he isn't in the best XI. For some reason, somebody's gone and taken poor Agoos out of the picture. I won't touch this, because I don't know how to mess with the formatting but it needs to be changed. Poor Agoos. He must be feeling terrible. T.z0n3 02:46, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed it. It was correct as of January, but a vandal changed it and it had gone unnoticed. Thanks for reporting it. --ChaChaFut 03:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. Thank YOU for editing it. T.z0n3 13:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect
Talk:Susan J. Kelley

message: As part of a review of all nursing wikiproject articles, I have changed this article's importance to low per Wikipedia:WikiProject Nursing/Assessment#Importance scale.  I have also added start class. It really does read like a resume I'm afraid. If you disagree, please leave a note here so we can discuss it.  Cheers, Basie (talk) 07:15, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:NURSE]] priority review
Talk:Hydrogen potassium ATPase

message: Two things: I looked for this reference on Pubmed and could not find it: Cell biology of acid secretion by the parietal cell. Annual Review of Physiology. 2003; 65:103-31.  Could someone verify that it exists?
Secondly, I added this page to :Category:transport proteins could someone verify that this article belongs in this category?  I thought so but I wanted to be certain.  Thanks, delldot | talk 06:55, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done (by an unknown editor years ago). --Eleassar my talk 17:43, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious reference, categorisation
Talk:Jakob Rudnik

message: Excellent start of an article -- but who was Paul Ruegg, then?  
Elisabeth Poretsky mentions him in her book -- see Wikipedia article on her husband Ignace Reiss.
Aboudaqn (talk) 03:19, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Paul Ruegg

message: The article includes no details of what the eventual fate of the couple was. Is this unknown, or can the information be added?--Boreas74 You'll catch more flies with honey 11:36, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fate?
Talk:Might and Power

message: This is biased!--The judge and jury 07:02, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. This is one of the worst cases of editorialising I've seen in a while. Perhaps someone from the Project will have the inclination to make it more encyclopedic? Secret Squïrrel, approx 09:45, The Day after the Cup, 2007 (UTC)
There is a lot of good stuff there. Just needs to be checked. Wallie (talk) 20:03, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:4th Guards Air and Air Defence Forces Army

message: The 4th Air Army is now also merged with the PVO merging it with the 12th Independent Corps of PVO.-- mrg3105mrg3105   03:34, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New title 
Talk:CMT Crossroads

message: Proposing a merge to Crossroads (CMT TV series). There because that has a disambiguation page already, as well as links from CMT, etc. --Izno 07:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I note that the episodes as broadcast consistently list the "guest" (i.e., the non-Country artist) before the artist more firmly associated with Country music; this Wikipedia page consistently puts the Country artist first.
I would propose to flip the order so that the order on the page matches the order in the shows.
Any thoughts? Jlhollin (talk) 22:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ordering of names
Talk:Crossroads (CMT TV series)

message: Proposing a merge from CMT Crossroads.--Izno 07:09, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Sodium/phosphate cotransporter

message: Would it be apropriate to put this article into :Category:Transport proteins?  Thanks, delldot | talk 07:09, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: May want to include exchange is in "exchange" for sodium. Not just talk about phosphate 129.180.1.214 (talk) 13:57, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't leave out "Sodium" 

message: This seems confusing: The section “Human PNaS proteins” lists three SLC families: SLC17, SLC34 and SLC20.  The list is introduced with “The PNaS family is also called the SLC34 family”.
That seems a misleading name for family said to "...include (but not limited to)" SLC34, SLC17, and SLC20.
[article] on the SLC group has a nice discussion of the naming convention.  Is there something similar for PNaS?
Captain Puget (talk) 22:52, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  PNaS also called SLC34 family?
Talk:Bart the bear

message: That was funny, I'm sure it was unintentional but it made me laugh. Good to see an article for Bart. Saikokira 20:53, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Bart's mother was a bear"

message: I've just realised this article shouldn't even have been created as Bart the Bear has exiisted for a long time. I'm redirecting this to that one. Saikokira 20:59, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicate article
Talk:Zdravko Kuzmanović

message: This article says he has a Serbian background whereas the wikipedia article says he has a Croatian background. 
http://www.jadransport.org/articles/3770.html
Can anyone verify?
Batobatobato 23:17, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Serb or Croat background?
Talk:Meiji Shrine

message: Meiji Shrine (明治神宮, Meiji Jingū), is a Shinto shrine in Shibuya, Tokyo, that is dedicated to the deified spirits of Emperor Meiji and his wife, Empress Shōken.[1][2] The shrine does not contain the emperor's grave, which is located at Fushimi-momoyama, south of Kyoto. 103.184.92.134 (talk) 18:15, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meji shrine
Talk:Continuous stirred-tank reactor

message: 18:42, 5 October 2009 Rickproser (talk | contribs) (4,625 bytes) (added context of environmental engineering) (undo) 
I'm moved his edit here to explain why I changed it.  I put my comments below each bullet point.  With this info already included, it is redundant and has been removed.  If any of this does need to be included, let's discuss it.  BeastRHIT (talk) 05:26, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit from Rickproser

message: There is occasionally a misunderstanding of the word "continuous".  The misunderstanding appears to be most common in environmental/civil engineering, as above, where the correspondent suggests that it might relate to a "continuously stirred" tank — presumably in contrast to a tank without continuous stirring!  But no reason to make such a contrast exists.  
The intended contrast is actually between
* a tank into/from which material continuously flows
* a tank into/from which no material flows — i.e. a batch reactor.  
To clarify this point, it is common among chemical engineers to refer to a continuous-flow stirred-tank reactor (CFSTR).  In fact this would be a better name for everybody to use, and so perhaps a better name for this article on WP too; but for now I've just added this as an 'alternative' into the article, supported by two references from academic websites.  
—DIV (120.18.91.48 (talk) 11:10, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misunderstanding of "continuous" 

message: I will be editing this article as part of an environmental engineering course assignment. Below is a growing list of academic sources I will be using to edit this article. Any additional sources you recommend or suggestions for improving this article are greatly appreciated!
* Mark M. Benjamin and Desmond F. Lawler. (2013). Water Quality Engineering Physical/Chemical Treatment Processes.
* George Tchobanoglous, et al. (2014). Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th Ed.
Jnewman12 (talk) 16:56, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography for editing article
Talk:Zenker's fixative

message: Zenker's fixative is named after Konrad Zenker, German histologist, who died in 1894;  It is not connected with Friedrich Albert von Zenker, a famous pathologist.  GhostofSuperslum 07:21, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Achtung
Talk:Signal transducing adaptor protein

message: Would it be appropriate to put this article into :Category:transport proteins?  Thanks, delldot | talk 07:24, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I noticed that "adaptor protein" redirects to this article. Are all adaptor proteins classified as signal transducing adaptor proteins? Are there any other types of adaptor proteins with no corresponding Wikipedia article? Jarble (talk) 02:40, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: In answer to your questions, No and no/yes, but it was made as a redirect without content. I'm in the process of fixing this problem with a disambiguation page, Adaptor protein and will be composing Adaptor proteins, vesicular transport. You may want to look at AP2 adaptor complex which has some content about the sort of adaptor proteins I'm intersted in. BTW, I had a look at your user page. You are absolutely correct that wikipedia needs a better peer review system. JeanOhm (talk) 02:58, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Is "adaptor protein" synonymous with "signal transducing adaptor protein"?

message: See http://www.nature.com/onc/journal/v20/n44/full/1204769a.html (Oncogene (2001) 20, 6270-6272).
Gilded Snail (talk) 18:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: and everybody else following this article. This sentence "Adaptor proteins contain a variety of protein-binding modules that link protein-binding partners together and facilitate the creation of larger signaling complexes" is the direct quote and was made by 203.87.156.11 on 23 January 2013. I'm a newcomer. What should be done about this?JeanOhm (talk) 03:17, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text in intro is copied verbatim from Nature article
Talk:Girl Got Game

message: As of 31 August 2009, per corporate's own listing. I'd add this to the article, but the T-pop editions aren't listed yet. —Quasirandom (talk) 20:19, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tokyopop editions now out of print 

message: here a review.
--Gabriel Yuji (talk) 05:35, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: If it's a woman living as a man only for convenience and not for an actual change of gender identity I'm not sure if it should count in the LGBT project...
WhisperToMe (talk) 10:23, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: LGBT project
Talk:Bosom Buddies

message: IMDB lists 38 episodes, while this Wikipedia page currently lists 37.  Perhaps IMDB is counting the pilot?  Did that episode air?  If so, it would seem that the correct number is 38, right? --Knagl (talk) 02:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of Episodes?

message: I have the second season of Bosom Buddies on disc, but it is so scratched that the final three episodes won't even play. So, can someone tell me if Kip and Sonny end up together or not?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.247.244.120 (talk) 19:58, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do Kip and Sonny End Up Together? 

message: According to the Season 2 DVD release, the last episode was "Cablevision". This episode aired about 2 months after the "final" episode, which Wikipedia says it aired in January, 1982, as opposed to May of that year. IXPpl (talk) 18:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD's "Last Episode"
Talk:Allergic reactions to anesthesia

message: * I'm not sure that this article has the most broad and objective title. I found in in the Lonelypages list, and linked to it from the local anaesthesia article, but I don't know that it would be found otherwise. Perhaps during is not the most objective title; maybe it should be Allergic reactions to anaesthesia? Or simply merged into either the allergy or anaesthesia articles? LeSaint 07:29, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I'm
Talk:Nicolaus Copernicus

message: I think the subsection labeled Controversy, is unclear. Take Isaac Newton, Galileo Galilei, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Charles Darwin. All these scientists had controversies during their lives. They don't have a dedicated section for those. This has a peculiar feel to it. It should be labeled Controversies during lifetime, or smth similar. There's no controversy about geocentrism. Gamma1138 (talk) 10:46, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Because he´s german. Just see the discussion above. Every German knows that "Nicolaus Copernicus" was born Niklas Koppernigk (a Name not even revealed in this shoddy english article), was definitely German, spoke only german and latin, but the poles just love to get their sticky little fingers on him, because his place of birth happens to be in todays poland (courtesy of Stalin). This is simply an exit "strategy" if the polonisation fails - then a negative narrative like "Controversy" helps to decry the "f###### german". After all, it is widely en vouge in en:wp and the rest of the world to shit on the germans. ;-) 217.80.147.36 (talk) 20:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Simply mad! Johnbod (talk) 20:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Actually Galileo has two different sections called "Controversy over...". He and Copernicus are probably the two most controversial big scientic names. Were Newton and Leibniz actually controversial? Darwin's "controversy" is largely a myth of science, when examined closely. In science his theories were accepted smoothly and rapidly. Johnbod (talk) 20:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does this article have a section named Controversy? 

message: "His father was a merchant from Kraków (Krakau) and his mother was the daughter of a wealthy Toruń merchant.[13"
But: the father´s side of Upper Silesian and the mother´s side od Lower Silesian origin.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:9E8:20D2:E100:4CD2:347F:8EFC:1838 (talk) 20:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silesian roots 

message: In the "Commemoration" section of the article, in the subsection titled "Poland", in the second paragraph change the "[...] in Poland's third largest city, Łódź." to "[...] in Poland's fourth largest city, Łódź."
In the article the city of Łódź is called Poland's third largest city. In the data provided in the Polish Wikipedia (data from 20th July 2023), the population of Łódź city has dropped and currently city of Wrocław has surpassed Łódź in the number of population. BlueBlack22 (talk) 10:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This is also verified and cited on the Łódź page. Jamedeus (talk) 18:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 April 2024 

message: in the Work section, "till" is used in "(or perhaps till his uncle's death on 29 March 1512)" and i believe this should be changed to until Maddybac (talk) 16:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: M.Bitton (talk) 17:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 May 2024
Talk:Elizabeth Gorham Hoag

message: I've tagged this page with  and  tags because over all this page is too chatty. It doesn't sound like it belongs in an encyclopedia and only cites one source. As for the weasel words a great example of this on this page would be "She was a slender, delicate girl with a pale face, dark curly hair, and brilliant dark eyes" unless somebody has said this exactly (as in quoted, and not written by somebody for the use on a website) then it's unnecessary and could easily be summed up differently with appropriate sources. --ImmortalGoddezz 07:41, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I took out the phrase in question.  Is there anything else you notice?--Gloriamarie 05:35, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent tags
Talk:Integrated Geo Systems

message: A tag has been placed on :Integrated Geo Systems, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. 
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. GeoMatrix 07:42, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Timotheos Thomas

message: I have no idea why, but I just hate to see all the articles this person contributed just deleted. They deserve it for copyright violation, but I still hate to see it. So I'm revising. But it's late and I have to go to bed. I'm trying to abridge greatly, and then I will wikify. If anybody wants to take over, please do.  Sean Lotz  talk  07:47, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:George Augustus Sala

message: Reportedly also the author (or part-author) of a pornographic stage production Harlequin Prince Cherrytop. --HenriLobineau 07:59, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Perhaps this page would be better put at George Augustus Sala, as he seemed never himself to use his second middle name of Henry. I have seen his quotes on the web (well, really, just one), but only as G.A. Sala. Is there any disagreement? (Also, would we apply this to his wikiquote page if moved?) —OverMyHead 19:39, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 

message: The page doesn't really introduce reasons why this guy was notable first up.  It kind of just reads like a life story before you actually discover why he deserves a wikipedia entry.  Perhaps it should mention it right at the top.  --Biatch (talk) 01:05, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening paragraph
File talk:CAGrave.jpg/vote

message: I believe this image should become a featured article because it an altogether interesting image. The use of black and white, gives the image an aged and slightly eerie effect. The shadows and storm clouds in the picture also add a spooky affect. The image is used in pages:
* Cemetery
* Headstone
* Castle Ashby
* User:Brookie
The Image was taken by R.N.Marshman,  aka User:Brookie) on 12 March 2005. 
10:38, 2 Apr 2005      
* Nominate and support. Great image, has the 'wow' factor, definately should be featured picture. --Electricmoose 10:38, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Brookie here the photographer - you have the menacing clouds in the background the mulitple image of the crosses all set off in B+W all aimed to create a spooky and atmospheric picture - and don't we get a little spooked in graveyards? I do! - does that help? Brookie 17:13, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

text: The graveyard is not on a hill at all - it is quite flat. The point of the photo is that you can only see the shadow of another unseen grave.Brookie 08:46, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/CAGrave|CAGrave]]
Talk:Brothers of the Head

message: In theory this should be at Brothers of the Head (film) and this entry should be for the novel. (Emperor 11:09, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would suggest writing an article for the novel, then requesting a move. Coolug (talk) 20:23, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Novel
Talk:Achille Marozzo

message: I'm not a specialist from Marozzo, but some indications in the text seemed to me doubtful :
there are lot of masters in the XVIth century who published treaties of great quality and interest, it seems then difficult to write that Marozzo's treaty was the most important. For example, the treaty that Agrippa published in 1553 had probably much more influence than Marozzo's.
I've done a biography from Joachim Meyer using archives sources, and the link between Marozzo and Meyer is completly unknown to me until reading this short notice. Is there any clue that can valid this assertion?
Olivier Dupuis 08:14, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Samvatsara

message: I find it very surprising that there is no link between this article and the Sexagenary cycle used in East Asia. They seem to work on the same principle, and I wouldn't be surprised if one was the source for the other (as is the case with the mapping between planets and days of the week). Śiva (talk) 07:35, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There is now! 4pq1injbok (talk) 14:27, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexagenary cycle (干支)