Talk:Constitutional reform in the Philippines

message: Definately, they have to file this landmark futile attempt to extend the 2010 term of PGMA via a Trojan horse: House Speaker Prospero Nograles today said he is ready to sit down with Senator Aquilino Pimentel to discuss the Senate-endorsed Charter change aimed to turn the country into a federal system of government. But he clarified that he will support it if the implementation should take place after 2010.
:Today, Philippines embarked in a landmark step to change and overhall the 1987 constitution, that is, 21 years ago. Rep. Monico O. Puentevella on May 7, 2008, filed House Concurrent Resolution No. 15 which supported Senate Resolution No. 10. Unlike the Pimentel Senate Resolution, Puentevella included the option of holding a constitutional convention, but excluded the People's Initiative mode.gmanews.tv, House resolution supports change in form of government --Florentino floro (talk) 09:16, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Arroyo, Nograles, Pimentel Cha Cha

message: To everyone who keeps on adding STUPID and IMMATURE statements in the main page and talk page, please stop and if you may, you are free to commit hara-kiri to do everyone a favor to end your worthless life for the sake of everyone's benefit. Do not vandalize this Wikipedia entry about the Philippine Charter change. You may hate Charter change but this is a Encyclopedia entry, take your stupid, uneducated voices to the forums! Triadwarfare (talk) 11:06, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I am reluctant to remove comments by on this talk page even when they are clearly off-topic, but I did so anyway. The comments were from years ago and were cluttering up this Talk page making it more difficult, especially since the comments were in all-caps, to see the more legitimate and helpful comments. --Bruce Hall (talk) 04:27, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is Wikipedia, Not an Online Forum!!! 

message: Do we need four separate articles?  Maybe we should combine People's Initiative, Constitutional Convention (Philippines), and Constituent Assembly (Philippines), into Constitutional reform in the Philippines. --Bruce Hall (talk) 04:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging other articles into this 

message: The term "constituent assembly" does not appear in the 1987 Constitution. All the Constitution requires is a vote of the members of Congress without saying how they should vote. Indeed some argue that the Philippine Congress can pass amendments like the US Congress does, like any other bill, just with a different margin required for passage. To say that the Constitution requires a constituent assembly is an interpretation of the Constitution and therefore a creditable WP:Third party source is needed.  The Constitution itself cannot be used as a citation. --Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 14:50, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Constituent Assembly" term not in the Constitution 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Constitutional reform in the Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927015840/http://www.pia.gov.ph/default.asp?m=12&r=R11&y=06&mo=12&fi=p061027.htm&no=03 to http://www.pia.gov.ph/default.asp?m=12&r=R11&y=06&mo=12&fi=p061027.htm&no=03
*Added  tag to http://www.mbc.com.ph/pressStatements/2006_dec7.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080920154621/http://newsinfo.inquirer.net:80/inquirerheadlines/nation/view_article.php?article_id=37228 to http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view_article.php?article_id=37228
*Added  tag to http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/storypage.aspx?StoryID=116791
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080812160751/https://newsinfo.inquirer.net:80/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20080812-154032/Arroyo-resurrects-Charter-change to http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20080812-154032/Arroyo-resurrects-Charter-change
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080813070259/http://newsinfo.inquirer.net:80/breakingnews/nation/view/20080812-154172/All-systems-go-for-Charter-change--Palace to http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/nation/view/20080812-154172/All-systems-go-for-Charter-change--Palace
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080813112026/http://newsinfo.inquirer.net:80/breakingnews/nation/view/20080812-154202/Solons-survey-Majority-in-House-for-Charter-Change to http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/nation/view/20080812-154202/Solons-survey-Majority-in-House-for-Charter-Change
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070209233655/http://www.gov.ph:80/aboutphil/a17.asp to http://www.gov.ph/aboutphil/a17.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070205023019/http://www.concord.ops.gov.ph:80/ to http://www.concord.ops.gov.ph/
*Added  tag to http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/storypage.aspx?StoryId=106789
*Added  tag to http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/images/news/newspics/downloads/Joint%20Senate%20Resolution%20No.%2010%20Federal%20System%20of%20Government.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:14, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article needs more information on ongoing and recent events regarding the Duterte administration's efforts on constitutional reform, many of which can be seen in this article.
Best wishes. Hijo de Caridad95 (talk) 05:27, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current events 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved   (t · c) buidhe 04:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Constitutional reform in the Philippines →  – Per WP:COMMONNAME PyroFloe (talk) 04:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 January 2021