Talk:Alastair Windsor, 2nd Duke of Connaught and Strathearn

message: Why is he at a name he was only known by for the first three years of his life?  He should be at Alastair Windsor, 2nd Duke of Connaught and Strathearn, shouldn't he? john k 00:24, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This title suggests that he was "Prince Arthur" whilst Duke of Connaught and Strathearn. I know some sources say that he was never in fact legally deprived of his Royal style, and so was in fact what the title says he was, even though he was never called it during his lifetime, but that's not what the article says. If we're going to take a position here it should at least be a consistent one. Proteus (Talk) 22:48, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: This site gives the title as Macduff, as does the article on Duke of Fife. I'm amending the D to lower case through the whole article. Opera hat (talk) 23:42, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Macduff/MacDuff 

message: Can somebody explain me the logics behind his coat of arms?? It make no sense to me! Mr. D. E. Mophon (talk) 10:09, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Basically he quartered the Royal arms he got from his father with the arms of his mother who was an armorial heiress, that is to say that she was the last to bear those arms since there were no further heirs for them. That gave Alistair the right to quarter them with his paternal arms. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 11:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Coat of Arms?

message: I have (informally) asked the editor who recently moved this page for a review. I did so for the following two reasons:
1) All articles on this Wikipedia on British Peers include a surname in the article title. That goes for articles on peers and courtesy title holders called Windsor as well. Those members of the House of Windsor that do not have the title of HRH revert to the naming conventions for peers. See also the recent discussion on George Windsor, Earl of St Andrews. Also see these article titles: Alexander Windsor, Earl of Ulster, Claire Windsor, Countess of Ulster, Xan Windsor, Lord Culloden, Sylvana Windsor, Countess of St Andrews and Edward Windsor, Lord Downpatrick. For consistency I would think that it therefore should be 'Alastair Windsor, 2nd Duke of Connaught and Strathearn' as well. Also this seems to be the way to name this article per NCROY.
2) I can see hardly any discussion on the talk page in the section where the move was requested. Only a remark by the proposer of the move saying "— Only three sources call him Alastair Windsor . More sources leave it out ". This reasoning shouldn't override Wikipedia policy. Also no one seems to have participated in the discussion further. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 18:55, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I feel Alastair should be an exception. He was Prince for most of his life and hardly if at all used the Windsor surname. And more sources don't use the name. If no one commented in the period that the request was made, it can be assumed no one opposed it..--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 19:03, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, he was a Prince from 1914 to 1917. That's hardly most of his life. As for the fact he didn't use the name Windsor a lot, I doubt any of the peers and courtesy peers called Windsor use it a lot. I just don't see why he in particular should stand out from the others. I don't think there's a very specific reason for random sources to leave out the surname. He's not such a well known entity in today's world that there could have been a specific thought about that. After all, peers often don't use their formal surnames. I know that no one opposed at the time, but it's caught my attention that some move discussions are relisted when participation hasn't been large. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 19:31, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Create another request with the reasons you have stated.--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 03:55, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review of the above request move 

message: There is a differing account of his death in a book about the Royal Family during World War II (forgot its title and author), in that he was found dead in a (cold) room with a window open having apparently opened it to "be sick" after heavy drinking and that he was "dutifully reported 'Died on active service'. Anyone read it? If he had fallen out of a window, might he have sustained injuries? (The book was borrowed from library so unlikely to find it.) I have added a citation need against the alleged accident, not against the statement his death was due to hypothermia.Cloptonson (talk) 11:18, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Death cause

message: According to the National Archives, the King had intended to give Alastair the title of Prince - but various discussions took up so much time that the King changed his mind before he was given the title.  So editing is required!  https://www.heraldica.org/topics/britain/TNA/HO_45_18980.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.69.143 (talk) 18:41, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: According to newspapers, etiquette books, and directories (including those listed in the article) he was given the title by descent. Great-grandchildren of the monarch used the style Highness as a matter of custom. It did not require a grant. DrKay (talk) 20:48, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

text: We need to be careful here. As pointed out at https://www.heraldica.org/topics/britain/prince_highness.htm, previous great-grandchildren were styled as Highness and princes and so was Alastair originally. Celia Homeford (talk) 09:31, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

text: As the section is unsourced, I've cut it down. DrKay (talk) 19:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Never actually a Prince