lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Squantz Pond State Park

message: Indeed, i agree with the alternative history, and i have a reference to source it. I will do this soon. SageRad (talk) 21:10, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: In my opinion, it would be better to put the history into the article on [Squantz Pond] itself, and not on this article for the state park. This article would mention it and link to the other article for more history. SageRad (talk) 21:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:The Fifth Horseman (novel)

message: Collins and LaPierre have mixed history and research to make a very believable novel. The publishers have noted that eventually we may have to confront this: it is a race against time locking up that Russian uranium and plutonium lying around. God knows people want to do it, that Russian fissile material is the means to the motive. 
I recommend reading H.G. Wells "A World Set Free". "Malcontents" build Carolinium bombs (Wells got the behavior of fission wrong) that threaten civilization and cities and a strong world government (stronger than the United Nations) is the way nations seek "peace and safety", as the Bible puts it.
Then go read Revelations. If a bomb in the trunk of a car can wipe out a corner of a city, it doesn't matter which government you're an official of, you're going to be scared.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris-marsh-usa (talk • contribs) 02:06, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very Recommended
Talk:Dittsche

message: Moved to talk as excessplot detail RJFJR (talk) 06:00, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Excessive detail
Template talk:Rockefeller family

message: I have excluded names not notable enough for WP bio articles beyond the 2nd generation because there are too many to include, IMO.  Feel free to add them or to use the family tree commands to create a real family tree.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM)  16:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Lai da Sontga Maria

message: The article should identify the language in which the article is named, bearing in mind that this is English Wikipedia, not "All the Languages in the World" Wikipedia. It's obviously not Italian, as the article gives the lake's Italian name (just in case, I guess, some Italians may happen to be reading English Wikipedia, and be wondering what the name of the lake is in their lanfguage).  I don't think it's  French, and I'm pretty sure it's not Swiss German.  Is it Romansch?  What is its official name?  What language is spoken by the people who live and work on it? It lies mostly in a canton with a German name. Shouldn't Wikipedia call it by its German name, whatever that is? J. D. Crutchfield | Talk 00:10, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language?
Talk:Rotary switch

message: Could someone add to Rotary Switches and explain the difference between "shorting" and "non-shorting"?
....
I believe shorting vs non-shoring is the same as "make-before-break" vs. "make-after-break".
One thing on this page is wrong:  "The switch is layered to allow the use of multiple poles, each layer is equivalent to one pole."  This is not right, as it is possible to have more than one pole on a layer (better known as a "deck").  This is done by having more than one arm/spoke (I think these are called actuators ?) on each deck.  One issue that is a bit mysterious to me is that there are eg single pole switches that have multiple decks.  Could someone make clear what is going on with this?  I'm wondering if these are simply multi-pole switches that have all the poles connected together into one (?)  DiagonalArg (talk) 08:52, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lai da Curnera

message: What is 41.1 mio m³? 41.1 million m³? 41100000 m³ = 0.0411 km³? ? Peter Horn User talk 01:48, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this? 
Talk:Medicago minima

message: If this helps: I was looking at this paper and saw that the leaf life span for the Medicago minima, Leguminosae	is 70 ± 2.7 (days). States: "This study was conducted in Mediterranean old-fields over a 4-yr period on 42 species differing in successional status." 
"Leaf life span, dynamics and construction cost of species from Mediterranean old-fields differing in successional status"
Marie-Laure Navas, Béatrice Ducout, Catherine Roumet, Jean Richarte, Joël Garnier, Eric Garnier.
New Phytologist,
Volume 159, Issue 1, pages 213–228, July 2003.
Article first published online: 12 JUN 2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00790.x
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00790.x/full
Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 17:27, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaf life span (LLS)
Talk:Registered representative (securities)

message: I think there's every reason to doubt that this article should exist at all, but AFD probably isn't the answer either, possibly a redirect (not even a merge) is appropriate.
Currently, this article is flagged as a stub, and also flagged as unsourced.
Its title is a local US-only legal term for what everyone (US included) calls a stock broker, and its content consists of some US legal details and recent US legal history most of which is already at stock broker#United States and the rest could easily be added.
Unless the article is expanded a lot (and sourced) there seems no call for a separate article. Other views? Andrewa (talk) 02:32, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternatives to move
Talk:Ekaggata

message: Need to incorporate the following
five hindrances and therefore has nothing to do with being "sharply focused on a minute area of existence." For example, AN 4.12 Sīla Sutta:
If while he is walking, standing, sitting, or reclining, a monk is free from greed and ill will, from sloth and torpor, from restlessness and worry, and has discarded doubt, then his will has become strong and impregnable; his mindfulness is alert and unclouded; his body is calm and unexcited; his mind is concentrated and collected (samāhitaṃ cittaṃ ekaggaṃ).
 Edgaras5836 (talk) 15:27, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whoever wrote this. Please consult me if need help putting things into proper English.
Talk:Weinmannia trichosperma

message: "gynoecium of superous ovary" - I took this out because I couldn't understand it  - I don't know what superous means for instance. Anyone have any ideas. Kahuroa (talk) 05:56, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You solved the problem Kahuroa --Jaguarlaser (talk) 05:03, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Description
Talk:Pope's Worldwide Prayer Network

message: Greetings fellow Wikipedians,
My name is Joseph Rutchik, and I am the Outreach Coordinator for the Apostleship of Prayer in the United States.  The organization has undergone quite a few changes, and the structure no longer resembles what is presented here on Wikipedia.  In the interest of properly representing the Apostleship of Prayer I have elected to edit this page.  If anyone feels the new version is inaccurate, please feel free to contact me.  My email is jrutchik@apostleshipofprayer.org.  Thank your for your time, and God bless you all.
:Actualll, we'll probably contact you on your talk page.  Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim  19:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I put some more work into the page. Can we delete the "ref" tag now? --Melchior2006 (talk) 09:10, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll take that as a yes. Thanks! --Melchior2006 (talk) 10:40, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  added references
Talk:Conference Bike

message: #Definite merge. Party Bike should be just a paragraph in the Conference Bike article. -AndrewDressel (talk) 14:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just cam here to suggest a merge with Party Bike as suggested above.  Springnuts (talk) 12:18, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ridiculous.  Radically different designs and purposes – the Conference Bike is not a rolling bar and the Party Bike is. 2600:1004:B14B:9E51:A9D4:A16D:E027:7DA1 (talk) 21:06, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Conference bike 

message: I believe this information is as valid as the PartyBike reference, given that it relates to a notable use of the bike.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.106.139.43 (talk) 06:47, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  CoBi UK
Talk:Revenge of the Slitheen

message: Are we sure about that golfer being a slitheen?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.120.86.35 (talk) 01:36, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Per this conversation: the first broadcast of this story's second part is on CBBC on September 24 — just after the first part airs on BBC1.  Should we amend the infobox to reflect this? --Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 19:29, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the first part is aired on CBBC on sunday the 23rd.  — Edokter • Talk •  19:37, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've answered this on the other article's talk page, but for the benefit of those not following both threads: whichever episode is claimed to be fill a 60 minute time slot.  Surely that implies a mistake on the part of the people running the website? --Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 20:10, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sunday has 60 min time slot whilst Monday only seems to have Part 1.OsirisV 14:42, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And it isn't just the Website... both Sky Digital AND Freeview show it with a 60 min time slot. But the infomation of Sundays and Mondays have been mixed up on Freeviews... It CAN happen.OsirisV 14:45, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Virgin Media Television says it too, but i've just seen the advert for it and its tommorow, they have all got the information wrong.--Wiggstar69 15:28, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Jep i checked. Turns out the 1hr time slot was the Holiday Special re-run.OsirisV 15:29, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airdate 

message: Should this be in as a previous Slitheen appearance?  It was only a cameo appearance - do we really need to note it?  StuartDD ( t   •   c ) 10:02, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They did appear in it so i'd say its an appearence, and since the graske is going to be in this series of SJA (as seen on the new advert) it makes it even more relivent.--Wiggstar69 10:33, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attack of the Graske? 

message: Is there a reason for not having information on part 2?  Or did no-one watch the CBBC channel?
StuartDD ( t   •   c ) 19:31, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  part 2 

message: ::See discussion here as to which dates to use.  StuartDD ( t   •   c ) 17:51, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  broadcast 

message: This needs a screenshot to be consisent. Could somenoe do it please?84.67.156.25 18:25, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Episode atricles are VERY incosistant. The people who write them take different styles for the article.  And what is a "screenshot" anyway?  StuartDD ( t   •   c ) 18:37, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Something I just added :)  — Edokter • Talk •  22:27, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a photo then!  08:28, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Screenshot
Talk:Hans Köchler's Lockerbie trial observer mission

message: Please see the Patrick Haseldine talk page for information about how conspiracy theorist Patrick Haseldine has been making POV edits under the alias Phase4  04:15, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Phase4 = Patrick Haseldine
Talk:Sport in Europe

message: Is "dereck jetter is a cheater" relevant for this article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.245.118.10 (talk) 12:09, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: What's the reasoning behind the ordering of the sports here? It doesn't seem to be based either on alphabetical order or popularity. (I'd guess cricket is mostly a niche sport outside the UK, and far less popular than basket or ice hockey overall, for instance.) Mostly, it seems to be more or less random. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 19:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's an article on the subject, which perhaps is not too scientific, but contains some valid points. https://humankinetics.me/2019/07/11/most-popular-sports-in-europe/ 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 23:42, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Ordering

message: This is of course slightly subjective (how are we categorising ‘notable’?) but surely this is missing Serena Williams? She’s one of the most successful tennis players ever. 109.249.189.136 (talk) 21:21, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Serena Williams was American, last I checked... 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 14:20, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable female players
Talk:Tag Team Match: M.U.S.C.L.E.

message: I changed the "Nazi gas attack" to "Red Rain of Berlin;"  If it's the gas attack, the character is actually Brocken, not Brocken Jr..  Junior never used the gas.
:Oh no-no, it's Brocken Jr. all right, they just gave him his dad's finisher for some reason. Seigi Choujin 18:26, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attack name correction

message: Shits disorganized.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.129.10 (talk) 09:51, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gameplay section sucks.
Talk:Texas State Highway Loop 289

message: The article says that Loop 289 is one of only three complete beltways in Texas, but it doesn't list I-410 in San Antonio as being one of them; yet I-410 completely circumnavigates San Antonio. Does I-410 not count because of its brief concurrency with I-35 on the northeast side of town? --JoBrLa (talk) 11:52, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Beltways in Texas
Talk:Ko Fan-long

message: It's above stub-class by now. We still need his name as it appears in Traditional Chinese characters.
Alton 08:25, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is. Therefore, I've re-assessed the article as Start-Class. His name in Traditional Chinese characters has been added. My regards, Laurinavicius (talk) 01:30, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Mitchel's GAC Claudy

message: At the time of writing this page has Category links with identical content. A proposal to delete categories relating to the GAA that use "Londonderry" (the name of the former administrative county) rather than "Derry" (the name of the GAA county) is under discussion. If you wish to contribute, follow the link from the "Londonderry" category. Brocach (talk) 18:57, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Category duplication
Wikipedia talk:School and university projects/ITESM Campus Toluca/Lirdoco

message: Please remember to do all communication concerning work related to the course on this discussion page.  It is the only page I can monitor and give students credit for doing their work.  Thank you!!! Thelmadatter 13:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reminder to Mentors and Students

message: The three contributions that students need to do next partial (~October) is to significantly edit an article, create a stub and translate an article from English Wikipedia for Spanish Wikipedia.  Mentors, if you would be so kind as to look over the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Mexico, Wikipedia:WikiProject_Mexico and :Category:Mexico_stubs pages to help students discuss and select projects to do in October. For more information, see the Wikipedia:School_and_university_projects/ITESM_Campus_Toluca/Syllabus page.  Thank you! Thelmadatter 13:59, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion for discussion
Talk:Oasis Academy Wintringham

message: I've removed a few comments that were clearly personal opinion, but the article needs a lot of work that I am not qualified to undertake. Gaffertape (talk) 16:19, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: "* John Edward Taylor Professor of English Literature from 1976-93 at the University of Manchester": the link goes to the newspaper proprietor but there is no alumnus here only the name of the professorship. The professor is possibly David John Palmer (source needed).--Johnsoniensis (talk) 21:03, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: John Edward Taylor

message: I can add a little technical assistance- use of tenses for example and some generic stuff about Oasis- but please can previous contributors correct any howlers I make. --ClemRutter (talk) 09:56, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A little care and attention
Talk:SMS Thüringen

message: Simple Internet searches indicate this ship was scrapped after the war.  However, divers are reporting that a wreck of the ship still exists.  See:  http://www.bobhenneman.info/Thuringenwreck.htm
Thanks,  Carl Gusler 22:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears to have been scrapped partially, with the 350 foot section of hull left underwater. I incorporated this info into the text of the article. Hope that helps. Parsecboy (talk) 19:14, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scrapped or Sunk? 

message: I think, this picture is not the battleship SMS Thüringen!! I mean, its the cruiser SMS Blücher, because the ship had only two funnels (similar Westphalen-class) and the side turrets are on the main deck. --URTh 09:34, 27. Apr. 2009 (CEST)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.122.61.138 (talk) 07:40, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's correct, the photograph is definitely Blücher. This was discovered on Commons a while ago; I thought I had removed it from this article already, but apparently I hadn't. Thanks for pointing it out. Parsecboy (talk) 11:21, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: picture

message: In the first paragraph, it cites the keel lay date as Nov 1908. In the paragraph under 'Construction' right below it, it cites it as Nov 1909. Don't know which one is accurate but clearly one is off.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.242.0.29 (talk) 19:26, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a typo - thanks for catching that. Parsecboy (talk) 19:36, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy in date of laying keel
Talk:CLG Doire Trasna

message: At the time of writing this page has Category links with identical content. A proposal to delete categories relating to the GAA that use "Londonderry" (the name of the former administrative county) rather than "Derry" (the name of the GAA county) is under discussion. If you wish to contribute, follow the link from the "Londonderry" category. Brocach (talk) 18:51, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Category duplication
Talk:Letov LF-107 Luňák

message: I'd like to see an explanation of, and some reference to, the claim of the Laminar model's being the world's first glider to feature a laminar-flow wing. --Raymondwinn (talk) 08:54, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Laminar wing
Talk:Trivial ring

message: I've added that this ring is also called the zero ring despite some pages seeming to insist it is not. This is a widely used term though. See for example Cohn's Intro to Ring theory page 10, Lang's Undergraduate Algebra page 84, Rotman's An Introduction to Homological Algebra page 12, Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry, etc. RobHar (talk) 20:04, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If there is consensus on notability, such a change would be fair. But I'm since a Google books search suggests that "trivial ring" is more common than "zero ring", deciding this will need someone who can assess all the factors.  —Quondum 23:29, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  For what it's worth: when I search Google books, I get 1460 results for "trivial ring" and 4620 results for "zero ring". Ebony Jackson (talk) 23:37, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The zero ring
Talk:WWCO

message: I've just completed a copy edit of the page. I removed a lot of fluff, because there just weren't very many options for correcting the article's sentence structure without removing all the unnecessary information. If I've removed anything that someone else considered crucial, I apologize, and of course restore it. However:
I'm thinking the History section should just be removed. It doesn't cite a single source, and it's been tagged for improvement for over two years. The vast majority of people who will search WP for this radio station will find the information they seek in the lead section, which is concise and does cite at least a couple of sources.
I'm going to put this page on my watchlist, wait a few days, and see if anyone else ventures an opinion. If not, I intend to go ahead and kill the section as unsourced. --Moralis (talk) 20:20, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy edit; Remove history section?
Talk:List of Montreal business people

message: User:Boffob deleted numerous names from this list that were still red links. it is not Wikipedia policy to do so and most of the names deleted are extremely important to the history on not just the Mopntreal economy but that of the Province of Quebec and Canada. D. C. Thomas 17:40, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Look, if all those red links are as important as you claim they are, write the articles first, then add them to the list. Go read WP:BIO about notability issues. Without their own articles, "John Doe, businessman" entries in this list are undistinguishable from "I.P. Freely, businessman" fake entries. A name with a red link and an occupation doesn't provide sufficient context to be included in this list. I'll remove the red links again, you can check the older version of the pages to start making bio articles.--Boffob 17:49, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Edit to add: Just to say: don't take it personally, the same thing happened to me when I tried to reinstate red links in the List of Quebec musicians.--Boffob 18:12, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:WJZA (AM)

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the current radio station call letters are the primary identification and the former callsign of the other station is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the radio station.- Dravecky (talk) 08:40, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page

message: Is the paragraph about having digital capability noteworthy? - there are 220 AM stations currently listed on the hdradio.com web site.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 20:12, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Digital capapbility

message: It should be noted that Meebo.com uses this as a prefix for their TLD.
(note moved from errant location on former disambiguation page) - Dravecky (talk) 08:47, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Meebo
Talk:WMEX (AM)

message: Call letters changed to WUFC on 10/4/12. The headline at top should say WUFC and have references to the page for those who entered WWZN in searches.
Someone seems determined to reinstate the program director's "advertising/puffery" (to use another commenter's description) and to reinstate the unjustified assertion that progressive talk had never been a success in the Boston market. At least one of these people was not registered as a user. Worth keeping an eye on this. AlanUS (talk) 17:22, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Miscellaneous

message: The station does brand itself as "1510 The Zone" sometimes, but do they do any sports other than BU hockey? The Young Guns are never on any more.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.101.161.116 (talk) 21:45, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sports Talk?

message: article refers to this as a done deal, but it's now late june and it's still sports.  did the blaze thing fall through? 209.172.25.115 (talk) 22:12, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: ok, it's blaze now.  i guess it just happened a couple weeks later than planned.  209.172.25.232 (talk) 05:45, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  2014 format change 

message: No mention of WMEX being on 1150 for years?  Really?  See WWDJ.  --plaws (talk) 16:46, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  WMEX 1150?  Hello