lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Euchites

message: The article says, They were mentioned for the first time in one of Michael Psellus' works, in the 11th century. What does this mean, since we appear to mention earlier sources? Dan (talk) 06:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Earlier Sources

message: I seem to have found which scholar rejects this claim. Phillip Schaff mentions this in his book
book 'The Christian Church from the 1st to the 20th Century' on the provided link he discredits other allegations like infanticide and lewdness against the Euchites and so the editor who wrote this claim that 'scholars reject this claim' probably thinks that this was another allegations meant to discredit the Euchites. The book also justifies the line 'By the 12th century the sect had reached Bohemia and Germany[citation needed]' As it states that the Bogomolis and Catharists 'sprang' from the Euchites. But this is not enough to support these two claims/lines.
~NotAFriend  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.100.157.55 (talk) 22:23, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  but scholars[which?] reject these claims 

message: The article states:"The Euchites or Messalians were a sect first mentioned in the 370s by Ephrem the Syrian,[1] and Epiphanius,[2] and Jerome.,[3][4] and first condemned as heretical in a synod of 383 AD". But first condemnation of Messalians was by Synod of Gangra 340. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synod_of_Gangra. User:31.223.131.85 , 21:08, 26 March 2017.
:Actually, AFAIK the article you refer to states that "The synod condemned Manichaeans, and their practices." However, this page refers to the "Messalians", which I take to be a different sect (since the one you cite is a Gnostic sub-sect)? JabberJaw (talk)  09:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  First condemnation
Talk:Virginia Cavaliers (historical)

message: Added because this really needs attention for historical accuracy.  I'm sure the sequence of events is accurate, but on the subject of character and motivation, the article inherits a polemical tone from its 1904 source - "But the people, who had been long imbibing the spirit of liberty in their forest home, at last rose in rebellion against the tyranny of their cynical old governor .... etc etc" - that needs cleaning up for neutrality. Tearlach 12:18, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried to clean it up as much as I could, but I found that virtually the entire article is copied verbatim from "History of the United States of America" (listed in the bibliography).  That book is in the public domain due to its age, so it's not a copyright issue, but article certainly needs a major rewrite.--Mojo Hand (talk) 02:23, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Expert tag

message: ... and Expert tag restored re  edits.
no, it just needs attention from someone with common sense
Much of it comes verbatim from some archaic, crap, biased encyclopedia...
:"the people, who had been long imbibing the spirit of liberty in their forest home, at last rose in rebellion against the tyranny of their cynical old governor
... and needs expert historical input to edit toward neutrality. Tearlach
OK I defer to your superior opinion. --SlipperyHippo 00:20, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, sorry, sorry - pardon my appalling manners (it's late on a Friday - never edit drunk!). But seriously, I hope you agree the above quote is an example of historical bias, and very dated style, in the source material. It does need review for NPOV, and I think the obvious pro-Colonial bias needs expert assessment of the material to correct.  For instance, how much authorial bias is there in the description of the governor as "tyrannical"? Tearlach 10:08, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Virginia Cavaliers (historical)]]
Talk:List of tunnels in New Zealand

message: Just clarified, there is ONE tunnel north of Okaihau.  I have changed the prose slightly to highlight that although it can be driven through by vehicles it is not on a main road. Bevanjlewis 12:31, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Okaihau Tunnel

message: maybe someone can unify the separate references for rail tunnels with the reference list at the bottom. PatrickDunfordNZ (talk) 20:29, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference lists

message: It would be good to find some official information about this tunnel in Auckland which runs from Penrose to Auckland CBD, create a page about it specifically and add it to this list of tunnels. It carries power cables critical to the Auckland and Northland power supply.
It was constructed after the 1998 power crisis...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1998_Auckland_power_crisis
Here are some links with some information...
https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/112878646/in-pictures-the-view-from-inside-aucklands-secret-underground-tunnel
https://www.tonkintaylor.co.nz/news/2019/6/inside-the-vector-tunnel/ Saddlebeast (talk) 09:30, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auckland Vector Tunnel 

message: Using the table on this page:
https://teara.govt.nz/en/1966/tunnels-rail-and-road
I calculated the sum of the length of all the removed tunnels and converted it into metres.
Auckland-Marton	Mole or Hapuawhenua*	15/2/09	0 10 30	207.20304
Auckland-Marton	Hedgehog*	1/6/07	0 05 71	114.866928
Auckland-Marton	Beaver or Taihape*	1/11/04	0 20 88	420.038784
Auckland-Marton	Black*	1/11/04	0 20 37	409.779216
Auckland-Marton	Sandstone or Possum*	1/11/04	0 27 08	544.762944
Auckland-Marton	Deer*	1/11/04	0 10 62	213.640416
Auckland-Marton	Elk or Utiku*	1/11/04	0 08 66	174.211488
Auckland-Marton	Moose*	1/11/04	0 03 80	76.44384
Auckland-Marton	Mangaweka North or Kowhai*	1/11/02	0 05 56	111.849408
Auckland-Marton	Makohine*	1/11/02	0 08 94 ½	179.944776
Auckland-Marton	Kiwi or Mangaonoho	14/4/1893	0 03 79 ½	76.343256
Auckland-Marton	Moa or Kaikarangi*	14/4/1893	0 04 12 ½	82.9818
				
				2612.065896 StuZealand (talk) 23:10, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length of the 12 removed tunnels on the NIMT line
Category talk:Association football biography stubs

message: There seem to be quite a few Finnish footballers - do they need their own stub? - Runcorn 12:39, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:   Languorrises (talk) 15:44, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Finland stub?

message: I suggest to create new subcategory for them, the numbers of stub of Brazilian, Argentine, Australian are large. And Australian were double category as Asia and Oceania. Matthew_hk tc 04:49, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded. These stub lists are far too long. --Runcorn 19:40, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that there are now stubs for Brazil, Argentina and Paraguay, but I can't see one for Australia.--Runcorn 11:43, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

text: The cat SouthAm footy is smaller, but Asian one are still very large, should it create sub-cat for Japanese and Korean, because many stubs are translate from Japanese and Korean wiki. Matthew_hk tc 20:42, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And Uruguayan shoul have subcat too. Matthew_hk tc] 20:46, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes, I'm all in favour of that.--Runcorn 21:10, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

text: In 2018 we've got all kinds of subcategories. Languorrises (talk) 15:44, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Brazilian, Argentine, Australian

message: The stub templates mark biographical article "relating to" a nation's football. Is that meant to be intentionally vague, sidestepping the complicated questions of nationality and immigration and such? If that's the case, does it make sense for this category page to identify the continent categories with their continental confederations? For example, this page identifies :Category:African football biography stubs with CAF. But an article on a player from, say, Cameroon would presumably be  and could get tagged with , even if the player is now living in Asia and not associated with CAF. Languorrises (talk) 15:35, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality and leagues
Talk:North Auckland Line

message: I wanted to doublecheck, but I believe what you're meaning at the beginning of the operation section is that freight services ran from Auckland to Whangarei, and services further north were operated from Whangarei?  Interestingly there was a loco depot at Opua and Okaihau so in fact some services north of Whangarei must have commenced there (I know Okaihau had full time drivers).  Can anyone clarify this? Bevanjlewis 12:43, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Operation

message: I've made some major changes to the article. I have removed some old information, however feel free to put back any old information which I have removed back into the article if you feel it should be included. I shall go over the old information in due course and find references for these information so I can include them in the article.
: I don't think much more substantial information was added since I did the original copy, in which case you'll find the information's reference in Railways of New Zealand: A Journey Through History by Churchman and Hurst. - Axver 10:01, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes 

message: This section is redundant thanks to the routemap. --LJ Holden 04:14, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stations 

message: I found the Lead to be disjointed, with the proposed Marsden Point branch coming before the layout of the NAL was even presented. I re-arranged the Lead without destroying anything, but did rewrite some sentences for clarity only. Also, a number of stations on the Western Line that had closed (some of them long ago) were present; I removed them. Akld guy (talk) 06:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-arranged Lead
Talk:Cheongpyeong

message: I suggest we break out the information on the Chung Pyung Retreat (or whatever it's called) to a separate article. It's not directely relavant to the geography of the area, and it really deserves an article of its own. --Uncle Ed (talk) 13:36, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Organoid

message: Shouldn't the oldest history for this article be December 2, 2008 or thereabouts?  That's when the fictional concept was moved to Zoids.  Though I don't see how best to do that. Perhaps the earlier history could be made that of a suitable redirect of something like Organoids (Zoids) or Organoids (fictional).  Vaughan Pratt (talk) 18:12, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing history 

message: Hi, I'm a student from Uskudar University. I edit this article (Organoid) as an assignment for my course (Recent Developments in Biotechnology). I already completed Wikipedia training modules to be proficient in Wikipedia editing. I would appreciate any support. Best wishes, Sıla. Silakulac (talk) 04:58, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing of Article 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.cell.com/cell-stem-cell/fulltext/S1934-5909(15)00115-0?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS1934590915001150%3Fshowall%3Dtrue. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 06:44, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Visi On

message: Almost all of the material I've seen calls it "VisiOn", a play on "vision". I have seen the name separated, as in the article here, but always in magazine articles and such. This was a common problem in the era before the 'net, when company's marketing material was often presented in text-only formats. I believe the article is incorrectly named. Maury 13:01, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Heck, we pray for first hand experience! I'd be happy to do these edits for you, but I don't think anyone would ever complain if you did it yourself -- I know I wouldn't. BTW, I think the prohibition on editing articles "about yourself" generally means biographical ones, not products you worked on, managed, etc. Maury 12:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

message: Google showed a slight preference for "VisiOn" over "Visi On" in the result count (800+ vs 700+) when I searched on: 1) visicorp vision and 2) visicorp "visi on". I've renamed the article to reflect this (and to make the article name match the VisiOn spelling used in the article body. --Zippy 00:18, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In this case, it's best not to go with the overall results of a Google search comparison. The best resource for Visi On on the greater Web is at this site. The spelling is clearly "Visi On" as shown in screenshots and photos of the program's documentation. Bumm13 23:01, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Also, the Visi On spelling is used at this site, which is another fairly-definitive resource on the matter. The page's Articles section links also favor the Visi On spelling (and are referring to contemporary print resources of that time period). Bumm13 23:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So, again, finally renamed as such ;-) --LimoWreck (talk) 19:28, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  VisiOn vs Visi On 

message: Recently mentions and a diskette picture of Visi On 1.0(1) were found. Apparently you need this or later release to run Visi On Plan 1.2 which was recently uploaded on WinWorld. The release is unleaked as of May 18th, 2020 so I can't put the release date here.
Влад557776 (talk) 19:31, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  1.01 clarification
Talk:Daniel of Moscow

message: He is not the first Prince of Moscow.--Douglasfrankfort (talk to me) 13:04, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We give predecessor "Yuri I" and successor "Yuri" in the infobox, both linked to Yuri of Moscow. 
At Ivan I of Moscow we link both elder brother "Yuri III" and predecessor "Yuri I" to Yuri of Moscow. See also Talk:Ivan I of Moscow#Yuri I or III?. --P64 (talk) 19:42, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yuri I and Yuri
Talk:Port Dickson (town)

message: http://www.marsecreview.com/2015/05/another-tanker-hijacked-in-se-asia-2/
Not notable? Hcobb (talk) 23:06, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of piracy? 
Talk:Stinkoman 20X6

message: Has anyone got information about Level 10? If it exists? If not? I think at least a little information about Level 10 should be provided (even if there isnt one, the acknoledgement of it would suffice) - Timmah01
:It will probably be added later. The entire game wasn't created at once. --Agent Aquamarine 22:35, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, they're making it. --kirbykook 16:13, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Dennis Elwell (astrologer)

message: This edit added , but I'd have thought that the article had enough material not to be tagged as a stub. Does anyone else have an opinion on this? Mitch Ames (talk) 12:57, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I added that last night as, for the first time, I became aware of the need to associate pages with categories and projects. But I take your point, and on reflection agree, so I'll remove it now. Zac Δ talk  13:05, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub?
Talk:Abrahadabra

message: *Keep: This is a topic in it's own right, and deserves it's own article. Somecallmetim 13:29, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Abracadabra? 

message: I removed the following:  Merge tag removed, so talk page doesn't show up in a category. Garion96 (talk) 16:05, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing merge suggestion

message: This article doesn't even agree with itself.  The first section states that "Abrahadabra" as such first appears in The Book of the Law circa 1904; then the next section states that Crowley "appears to say" he discovered the word prior to January 1901, and used it in the Invocation of Horus that was supposed to have led to the reception of The Book; also that it appears in a published 1901 diary.  Jonjon358 15:02, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Does this last edit solve the problem? Crowley doesn't seem to have published any work containing the Word until he started distributing the Book of the Law. Dan 08:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the Word 

message: Surely there is some relationship between the 'magickal' word abrahadabra and the 'magical' word abracadabra? This article should note either the connection, or the similarity somewhere. --Mal 10:48, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention of alternate (most widely known?) spelling 

message: meaning. by Kukuasu
forget them not! by earlie human as inspired by drug  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.171.61.131 (talk) 17:05, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abrahadabra 

message: What's the relevance of the material on the Lost Word of Freemasonry? The page clearly states that the Lost Word is not ABRAHADABRA, so why are we talking about it here? --Los358 (talk) 04:41, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost Word of Freemasonry Material Irrelevant? 
Talk:Ray Toro

message: There is already a page for Ray Toro on wikipedia! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raymond_Toro
72.29.217.2 (talk) 22:22, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete this! 

message: Ray Toro’s middle name is Manuel and his full name is Raymond Manuel Toro Ortiz Raytoroisgod57 (talk) 23:50, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:55, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 March 2022
Talk:Mycalesis patnia

message: This reference needs to be improved further, i.e. complete name of the author, complete journal, etc:
 1857; in Horsfield & Moore, Cat. lep. Ins. Mus. East India Coy (1): 232.—Carlosp420 13:32, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This must be Frederic Moore Catalogue of the Lepidopterous insects in the Museum of the East India Company. Not a very accessible source. Shyamal 04:22, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Jee 02:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: reference?
Talk:Rose Cross (version 2)

message: Do not merge. One article is about the Rosicrucians, the other is about a symbol called the Rosy Cross. Two different topics completely. Somecallmetim 13:32, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging Rosy Cross? 

message: Since this article is on essentially the same subject as Rosy Cross, these two articles should be merged.  --Jackhorkheimer 05:07, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do not merge; see discussion page at Rosy Cross article. --Lusitanian 00:23, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger with [[Rosy Cross]]
Talk:Buccal pumping

message: Costal respiration is breathing with the ribs. According to Jennifer Clack's book Gaining Ground, tetrapod ancetors started with two-stroke buccal pumping. Then tetrapods developed "exhalation powered by hypaxial muscles." The ability to inhale with the ribcage was just getting started in the first amniotes. The diaphragm came much later.
Air gulping, meanwhile, is something that fish do when the water is low in oxygen or too high in CO2. They gulp air, which they mix with water and pass through their gills. It's related to buccal pumping. Zyxwv99 (talk) 23:50, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Costal respiration and air gulping
Talk:Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica

message: * Removed the claim that the Mass is influenced by the Russian Orthodox rite, since it's not the case. Crowley wrote that the rite corresponds to the mass of the Roman Catholics. He wrote the Mass while in Russia. If someone can point out some citation which shows otherwise, swell! 
* Removed the claim that the structure of the ritual is influenced by the initiatory rites of OTO, since a citation is not really possible and I think that it's not really true as written. It could be said that steps and signs, similar to those used in the OTO initiations, are present in the Mass. Yet one could also say that steps and signs similar to those of Freemasonry, or any number of other Freemasonry-derived rites... so this whole influences bit needs revision and I'm not sure I'm up to the task at the moment.
* Corrected and cited the quote where he writes that the Mass is the central ceremony of the OTO, which incidentally includes the reference to the RCC Mass.
--Thiebes 15:28, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influences 

message: So the Saints of EGC article got moved to Gnostic Saints (Thelema), and this section got expanded. The sources for Blake and Bruno that I put in there this morning are in there, but what about Germer and Grady? Two EGC Bishops have told me that they are on the short list; is there some order publication on the internets that can be a source? Zack Anderson 75.73.50.113 (talk) 07:52, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed this by simply removing most of the stuff about the Saints and redirecting to their own page instead. Makes a lot more sense I think. --Rodneyorpheus (talk) 19:08, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Saints