Talk:Haakon VI

message: Henry Sinclair, ocean explorer,
Given that there is a lot of controversy & doubt over whether or not:
a)	Henry Sinclair is the medieval explorer “Prince Zichmni”
b)	That the letters written by the Zeno brothers of Venice, about “Prince Zichmni’s voyages are authentic.
and 
c)	that the voyages actually occurred at all.
Isn’t it better that Henry Sinclair, ocean explorer, be changed to Henry Sinclair, Baron of Roslin. As I have found from the Clan Website that he held that title before becoming Earl of Orkney.
Anyone disagree?
The explorer controversy is covered in his own Wiki entry and also needs tidying up
Jalipa
Clan Grant
 
Is this Haakon, clan-father of the Grants?Norgy (talk) 13:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: When did he die? This article say he died in September 11, 1380 while his son's article it says his son started his reign in July 29 after his father's death.  He was never desposed and died on the throne, so when did he died in July 29 or September 11?--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 07:18, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did he die? 

message: Sometimes I hit something so an edit goes through as saved rather than being a preview. Don't know how it happens. This is what my edit summary just now should be been:
* 20:36, 20 February 2011 SergeWoodzing (talk | contribs) (15,675 bytes) (Undid revision 414984317 by Againme (talk) - no numeral has ever been used for him as Swedish king - there may have been more pre-10th century, in any case he was the second known for sure). 
SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:40, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  No numeral as Swedish king 

message: The expansion of this article by an anonymous editor in March 2010 looks like a very close translation of the SNL article used as reference (leading to some awkward language). Should we be worried?   Fornadan (t) 10:27, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can a translation be copyvio? 

message: :If you're trying to request protection of this article, WP:RFPP is the place to go, although I doubt it will be protected as I don't see any disruption or vandalism occurring--Jac16888 Talk 13:34, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection 

message: This has to be the clearest example of WP:OWN I have ever seen. A self-professed IP "professor" is telling us how things are going to be and  dictating orders to us as if we were h dependant pupils. I respectfully suggest that the IP "professor" calm down, adopt a much less headstrong attitude and read up on the no-nos of article ownership before this behavior lands h at WP:RFCC. 
Please also note more carefully the following text in the expansion template added by the IP "professor" h-self: "You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well." That means me and everybody else, treated respectfully. SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:39, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now cleaned this up again and will keep looking at it. A lot of good work is intended and has been added in the expansion, so I'm glad to help fix things. SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:59, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership issue 

message: Thanks for your work on this one. Unfortunately, since this article has an outstanding cleanup tag on it, it's not eligible for GA at this time. Someone should either remove the empty section or complete it before the nomination is quickfailed. -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:59, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Good luck with the nomination. -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:08, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outstanding cleanup tag