lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:UTF-8

message: and Microsoft has a script for Windows 10, to enable it by default for its program Microsoft Notepad
    "Script How to set default encoding to UTF-8 for notepad by PowerShell". gallery.technet.microsoft.com. Retrieved 2018-01-30.
    https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/scriptcenter/How-to-set-default-2d9669ae?ranMID=24542&ranEAID=TnL5HPStwNw&ranSiteID=TnL5HPStwNw-1ayuyj6iLWwQHN_gI6Np_w&tduid=(1f29517b2ebdfe80772bf649d4c144b1)(256380)(2459594)(TnL5HPStwNw-1ayuyj6iLWwQHN_gI6Np_w)()
This link is dead. How to fix it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Un1Gfn (talk • contribs) 02:58, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That text, and that link, appears to have been removed, so there's no longer anything to fix. Guy Harris (talk) 23:43, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microsoft script dead link 

message: With respect to Special:Diff/1105781113, it's better to use just "ASCII" unless it could be misinterpreted as some other variant of ISO 646 instead of ANSI X3.4-1986. It is not the case here, but I think current usage in the article is okay. IANA preference for "US-ASCII" only matters for use in the charset parameter or similar where "ASCII" is not even a valid label at all. Please don't link it halfway as US-ASCII because that makes absolutely no sense in any context and looks like a formatting mistake. Link the whole US-ASCII, piping it if you don't like the redirect. – MwGamera (talk) 12:49, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  US-ASCII 

message: I would've fixed it myself but I don't know how to transform the remaining sentence to make sense. 2A01:C23:8D8D:BF00:C070:85C1:B1B8:4094 (talk) 16:17, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed it, I think. I'm not 100% sure it's how the previous editors intended. I invite them to review and confirm. Indefatigable (talk) 19:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article contains "{{efn", which looks like a mistake.
Talk:Alexa

message: For info, this page was moved to 'Alexa internet' (note case) whilst (a) remaining a disambig page, and (b) 'Alexa Internet' already existing as a page for that company. Having separately-cased pages otherwise the same would cause linking complications plus it needed to stay as a disambig page. --VampWillow 22:13, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: FYI:
Amazon rolled out a new line of Alexa devices, so can someone check up on that?    Me at my happiest! 01:09, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New devices
Talk:Cleartext

message: The intent of the discussion of the imaginary FOO protocol was to make clear that cleartext transmission is not necessarily in all cases, bad from a security standpoint. 
The removal of that discussion has removed that point, one which the reader may find useful, without replacing it with equivalent coverage. 
Perspective is always useful in so confusing (to the novice and many of the seasoned) field as crypto and security issues. I would suggest that the removed material should be reinserted or some alternative covering the same points by included. ww 22:45, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: The content of this article isn't borne out by any sources that I can find.  As I said at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cleartext, out of 80 books, the only one that didn't say that cleartext and plaintext were the same thing was a book on programming Visual BASIC.  And even that doesn't support what this article says.  Similarly, ISO/IEC 7498-2, the only source cited here, is well known for alternative terminology for otherwise identical concepts, such as its use of "encipher" and "decipher" instead of "encrypt" and "decrypt". So: What is the source for any of this content?  What source justifies this as being anything other than a redirect to plaintext?  Because there are a lot of sources, saying "cleartext: see plaintext" or similar, that say that it should. Uncle G (talk) 21:21, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research
Talk:Christmas ornament

message: Can we get a photo? Intrigue 22:58, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: I doubt this was legitimate. --77.176.203.12 (talk) 09:37, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: See the Christmas pickle article for clarification. (I buy them occasionally, not because of any traditions attached to them, rightly or wrongly, but because I think they're funny.) Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 04:33, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christmas pickle 

message: I put a section fact tag on the Chrismons section which makes a lot of dubious claims with no references.  Comet Tuttle (talk) 06:16, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, there's no Chrismon tree article; it's mentioned and illustrated within the Christmas tree article where the term redirects. There is a separate Chrismon article that deals with the religious symbol, not decorated trees. I have not looked for references. Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 00:49, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chrismons 

message: :The first decorated trees were adorned with apples, strings of popcorn, white candy canes and pastries in the shapes of stars, hearts and flowers.
This seem highly unlikely, especially the pop corn. Given that the Christmas tree tradition started during the early Middle Ages in Europe, before Christophorus Columbus was even born.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Se mj (talk • contribs) 23:20, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This seem unlikely
Talk:Nichelle Nichols

message: I think it should be mentioned, as documented in the biographic film, she went through an abbreviated version of astronaut training before going out to recruit, as she wanted to know and be able to honestly relate what was ahead for the people she recruited. Such dedication should be more widely known. 128.32.28.2 (talk) 19:26, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  NASA recruitment training
Talk:Aeolus

message: DesertAngel 06:12, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Look, Aeolus is my fav god, does anyone know any more recent legends about him??? I'd really like to know :D  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.46.34 (talk) 00:09, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  My Favorite Guy 

message: Differing genealogies and minor details don';t make multiple keeps of the Winds. The last two sections need joining together.--Wetman (talk) 21:11, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiplying Aeolus

message: How can the son of Hippotes be the son of Mimas?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grushenka (talk • contribs) 12:16, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the Greeks did not translate myth into "biography" and collect and burn as heretical all versions save the one that was declared orthodox.--Wetman (talk) 15:28, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mimas/Hippotes

message: IPA for classical Greek pronunciation gives [ájjolos]; it links over to "IPA for Greek", which lists two columns for each letter, rendering both the classical and modern pronunciations in IPA format.  However, there is no letter which gives the consonant "j" in classical (or modern, for that matter) pronunciation.  I suppose the IPA rendering in the article should be fixed, but I don't have a sufficient knowledge of classical Greek pronunciation.74.192.195.94 (talk) 11:20, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Incidentally, I understand the consonant [j], but I am questioning the validity of a double consonant for the vowel iota, and anyhow there seems to be no consonant that takes the sound [j] in Greek.74.192.195.94 (talk) 11:24, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: Is there a Roman equelevent(s) of this/these (Semi-)God(s)?, I can't find any mention.--82.134.154.25 (talk) 20:37, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roman version
Talk:Index investing

message: The article says, "The idea is that technical analysis and fundamental analysis are flawed because they require the evaluation of the past performance of securities in order to predict future returns of the securities". Well, future prices depend on future events, and future events can absolutely not be known. - Jerryseinfeld 23:58, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It sounds like you agree with the statement. mydogategodshat 00:39, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Future?

message: "The flaw of these investing methods is that past market returns are no indication of future returns." This has been edited for using the POV word "flaw".  Fundamental and technical analysis are controversial subjects, and this article is not a place for the debate. Shawnc 09:28, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Flaw

message: Perhaps we can leave a short introductory paragraph in topic Index investing, then refer the reader to the topic of Index fund. --MegaHasher 21:03, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Imelda Marcos

message: someone please edit this, google/Wikipedia is meant for true facts not wrong accusations. Gooskitzo (talk) 11:43, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: All fully sourced to WP:RS? Martinevans123 (talk) 11:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

text: @Showbizph: Please provide a link to actual reliable sources that prove otherwise. Chlod (say hi!) 07:06, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  stole billions? convicted criminal? please fix this 

message: Whoever author this pls stop being bias. For 36 years filipinos have been brainwashed by this leftist.. Imelda Marcos was acquitted in thousand cases filed by the Aquino's using the power of government and medias to strengthen thier claims against the Marcoses.. Showbizph (talk) 16:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Your claims is blatantly wrong and does not promote neutral point of view. Seems like a pro-Marcos guy trying to start an edit war against other editors here. The almighty anomalocaris • chat 11:57, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

text: Where are your concrete claims to prove that Imelda is finally innocent? (I'm sorry I can't allow YT conspiracy videos due to being user-generated content which is sometimes not reliable. Thanks. The almighty anomalocaris • chat 11:58, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: Are we just failing the article having only a single pair here and at Wikicommons? or there legitimately aren't actual photographs of an actual collection and this is just a successful urban myth / political hit job? — LlywelynII 13:24, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Vice has a piece here (with photos!) Howard the Duck (talk) 17:16, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: So... about the shoes
Talk:Ace of Spades (Motörhead album)

message: There seems to be something wrong with the infobox. It displays as raw text rather than formatted.J'onn J'onzz (talk) 14:52, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: I don't know what happened to the rest of the Talk page for this album but here's my original question.
I've never seen a US release of any of their previous albums and I've looked hard. All I can find are imports, none of them being the Mercury label their US-released counterparts were released on. So was this the first Motorhead album released in the US? 108.81.33.59 (talk) 04:35, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was ''Ace of Spades'' the first album released in the United States? 

message: Seeing some reverting over genre going on. Any sources to verify any of them? Any without a source should be removed... Sergecross73 msg me 01:45, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I think they're just fine the way they've been. when dealing with genres consensus can trump sources.  - FlightTime (open channel) 01:47, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally, no, that’s not how we handle something subjective like genre. But even if we did, there’s no consensus yet either. No discussion at all, just arguing through edit summaries. I’m surprised experienced editors are trying to handle it like this. If there’s a good-faith doubt, then we need a source. Sergecross73 msg me 01:54, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre
Talk:Project BLUEBIRD

message: I just want to make sure that the source that wrote this is correct about this operation. To the person who wrote this: Are you positive that this happened?
--Rentastrawberry 00:16, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this reliable

message: This article is suspicious, especially the parts about children and electroconvulsive therapy.  The ideas here are identical to those in Scientology.  Are there any Internet references, or any other books?  A2Kafir 17:19, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sounds like a [[Scientology]] tract 

message: I question that this text constitutes a valid source:
BLUEBIRD: Deliberate Creation of Multiple Personalities by Psychiatrists, Colin A. Ross, M.D., Richardson, Texas: Manitou Communications, 2000.
Does anyone have the document available to link to?  If so, does that link exist on a reliable site?    Have any editors actually read this document? 
Alpha262 21:04, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's mentioned on a number of websites (mostly blogs), but I can't find any authoritative references to it. – Quadell (talk) (random) 20:26, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 

message: I draw your attention to this document, the only reference to Project Bluebird I could find on any U.S. Government site; this one comes directly from cia.gov under the FIA.  It was released in 2004.  See this location for the document. A 'keyword' to find this document was bluebird, among others. I recognise this does not verify most of the substance of the article, i.e. if the CIA actually took part in the program and to what extent, however this is enough to show that "Bluebird" is a keyword of material the CIA investigated regarding mind control and hypnosis. DanielBC [talkcontribstats] 13:32, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Found verifiable source 

message: The info in this article comes mainly from one source - a fellow (Colin Ross, M.D.) who seems very much a conspiracy theorist.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.220.169.35 (talk) 02:24, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed
Talk:Hitchhiker (The Texas Chainsaw Massacre)

message: A disambiguation page must be created to also refer to a nubbin-tail
Where is the character from TCM referred to as "Nubbin"? Шизомби 18:49, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a really good question --Myles Long 22:28, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it okay if I move this to Edward Sawyer?--CyberGhostface 18:44, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: shoundnt be notted that he could have some sort of metal ilness, i mean, he is a little crazy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.211.239 (talk) 18:56, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mental ilness 

message: What about the girl that was picked up early in the film in the remake? Does her character correspond to this character in the original film?
If so, shouldn't there be a section of this page about her? I'm new to Wikipedia and wouldn't dare writing it myself until I had some more experience. Gay15boy 12:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know. To me, their only connection is that they are both hitchhikers who (on purpose or inadvertently) lead the teens to Leatherface. But they aren't the same character. It would be like having a section on Luda May on Drayton Sawyer's article because they are both oddballs running a store that the teens go to and they are both the patriatch/matriatch of their respective families.--CyberGhostface 21:42, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I originally meant to mention the girl from the remake (as well as how Hoyt's death is similar to Hitchhiker's) in the article when I rewrote portions of it, but decided against after realizing the credits listed her as "Teenage Girl" instead of "Hitchhiker" like I originally thought. Lord Crayak 22:48, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remake
Talk:Leave Home

message: Isn't it so that the 2nd US version featured "Sheena is a punk rocker", and the second European version "Babysitter"?(MrDeBeuker 19:43, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Carbona Not Glue

message: it seems that a lot of bands and artists of similar popularity and influence often get a lot more pages than the ramones, and i seek to change that. if i can get enough in here, i hope to restore each song tp its' own (expanded) aritcle, likewise with the other albums. any help with the expansion or comments, concerns etc should go to my talk page. peace. Joeyramoney 02:46, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: donesir. the article has now more than doubled in length. expect likewise for other ramones albums. Joeyramoney 23:36, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  i am going to expand the living bejesus out of this page 

message: Once again, someone has decided to use composer credit derived from reading a book about the Ramones rather than the credits as clearly stated on every LP and CD issue of this album.
And they appear to have done this with all the other early Ramones albums.  Perhaps it was the same person who also used to append Pete Townshend as the co-composer of certain Clash songs, based on similarities between those songs and some by the Who?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.92.148.18 (talk) 20:24, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research in Writer Credits 

message: Is it really correct to say the album was publicized with 3 singles, when 1 of them was actually released 14 years after the album? I think it would be more correct to say 2 singles, while still mentioning the later Subpop release. Robman94 (talk) 19:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I reworded it to:  CrowzRSA 19:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publicized with three singles? 

message: The page states that "The album cover was designed by Moshe Brakha, who had worked with the Rolling Stones to yield the Black and Blue (1976) cover art", but according to the Rolling Stones Black & Blue page the cover photograph was done by fashion photographer Hiro. There's no actual source for that quote, but it seems to come from the book "Sonic Cool: The Life & Death of Rock 'n' Roll" by Joe S. Harrington, as seen here on books.google.com:
"their second album, Leave Home, featured a cover photo by Moshe Brakha, who'd done the Rolling Stone's Black & Blue".
It seems to me that the author has confused the Rolling Stones album with this LP of the band Black'N'Blue, which does have photography by Moshe Brakha: https://www.discogs.com/release/1855331-Black-N-Blue-Without-Love Petetnt (talk) 14:25, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover art
Talk:Ship Arriving Too Late to Save a Drowning Witch

message: I know everything in wikipedia gets edited mercilessly.  Lets keep some humor on this page.  Frank would have appreciated it, for sure!  Totally! Kd4ttc 03:55, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  please keep for sure 

message: I just got the LP, and I notice on the back Steve Vai is credited for "Impossible Guitar Parts," not "Facemeltingly epic." It was that listing that made me buy the album, cause I had to know what an Impossible Guitar part sounded like. Can anyone confirm this version of the credits?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.177.82.232 (talk) 04:39, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That error was added  2 February 2008 by 71.224.75.233, booo, and  fixed  2 January 2009 by User:Toddles29, yaay. --Lexein (talk) 04:35, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  artists credit 

message: (removed from inside another editor's comment)
"No Not Now" having it's own article wouldn't hurt.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrmoustache14 (talk • contribs) 15:59, 24 August 2012‎
:Agreed. --Lexein (talk) 04:35, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: August 2012
Talk:Unit 100

message: This article needs so much clean up. The reference used at first was just a website without author name representation. Wikipedia is not a place to make a propaganda show. Research about both units are still in progress, so I rewrite the page to keep NPOV. Poo-T 01:06, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: is it me, or does the first external link SCREAM propaganda
24.187.143.27 23:27, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  propaganda
Talk:Great Karimun

message: This article's kind of a mess. VfD? - Walkiped 01:10, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Earlier conversations about article

message: Please help with WP:RS to move this article out of stub class SatuSuro 03:59, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Improve this article?
Talk:Pea soup

message: The article previously said that pea soup is tasty (which was marked as citation needed). While I do indeed think it's tasty, and looking at this article made me want to sit down with a big bowl of it, that's entirely subjective and not at all encyclopedic, so I've removed it. The section was specifically talking about use in Poland, especially in military settings, so if someone finds a source stating that it's popularly liked in that setting, and wants to re-add it in that specific sense, feel free. Arathald (talk) 07:10, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pea Soup Tasty 

message: I am afraid this photo was not made the title photo with good faith in mind. Keep in mind soup is normally made with several additional ingredients and the title photo features a plain pea dish. 2A00:1FA0:46B3:ECF4:0:57:6A15:D101 (talk) 14:34, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title photo grinds my gears 

message: Recently, a Wikipeditor added this link: https://smokyrecipe.com/split-pea-soup-instant-pot/
I think this recipe is kinda decent to add... somewhere. Cheers. 2A00:1FA0:46B3:ECF4:0:57:6A15:D101 (talk) 17:16, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smoky food's recipe
Talk:Bowl

message: The spotty bowl is one of the main bowl types - surely there's a free image somewhere? 217.205.94.62 (talk) 07:23, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spotty Bowl 

message: You can see there was one here that linked to tazón. there's such an article, but at wikidata's you can see that links to another, this one : cuenco. When it is here, we cannot see the one from wikidata. I'm hiding it like a commentary, but you may remove it, if better. --PLA y Grande Covián (talk) 21:59, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  interwikis (interlanguage links) apart from Wikidata, for the (es:) one 

message: I'm new to editing Wikipedia, so I had a noob question. Would it be appropriate to include a short snippet about the etymology of the word "bowl" on this page? I saw there was a an etymology section for the bowl entry on Wiktionary, but I wasn't sure about including it in Wikipedia. Is there a general policy on this? Thatwhichendureth (talk) 02:48, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: :As the name suggests, this item is considered to be a type of bowl. I understand that some may feel it to be an abomination to call it a "bowl", especially as many  washing up bowls are not round but are as rectangular as the sinks that they dwell in. Nevertheless, should  this type of bowl (and any other abominations, lol) be mentioned, if only as an exception? 92.25.47.124 (talk) 00:20, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Washing up bowl 
Talk:Frenular delta

message: Please do remove the photo if You find it not relevant.
I'll try to find a non-copyrighted line drawing version soon if possible.
Because there is no drawing, or photo on this page, I will add a picture, if anyone disagrees, discuss it on this talk page. Nikon307 06:26, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The fotos are relevant, offering important information. 79.251.70.162 (talk) 01:44, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

message: All of this is evidence against circumcision. Why can't we talk about this? 71.173.155.72 (talk) 02:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Then why is it removed