lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sagittaria

message: I prefer the illustration over the photograph with which it was recently replaced.  The photograph is attractive, but the illustration is more informative.  I don't believe there is yet enough text to accomodate both.  — Pekinensis 16:10, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There's absolutely no reason not to include both. — Omegatron 16:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: I removed a dead link, but as I do not know what it originally pointed to I could not fix it. I did find this http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Environment/CulRes/herbs.htm#Sagittaria from the dead page, but I do not know whether it is the correct item.JeremyCherfas (talk) 11:34, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead link

message: The "description" of this flower means nothing to me. It's nothing but technical jargon. It should be cleaned up to actually be a description in a commoner tongue.
I would do it, but I'm not a botanist, so I can't translate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.160.98.31 (talk) 13:53, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, there's too much jargon and it also is missing things like verbs and comparison with other plants. Kingdon (talk) 21:09, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agree. I  translated the field-note (or "lifted from a text-book) style, attempting to keep the technical terms while making it accessible encyclopedic language. For a plant nerd the terminology does have a kind of incantational "ring" to it. Will compare with other plants when get a chance. Manytexts (talk) 23:54, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical jargon 

message: Is "katniss" really a common name for this plant?
From which source is this information (other than the "panem" trilogy)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:5B:EA30:9900:FD79:59FB:FA2C:C381 (talk) 16:05, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Pehr Kalm, "katniss" was the name given to the plant by the Indians of New Jersey. It does not seem to be used in English, however. Zacwill (talk) 23:23, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  common names 

message: Something got dropped out of the beginning of the "Description" section. It starts out discussing the rhizome and morphs weirdly into discussing the seeds.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.153.243.78 (talk) 16:58, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Damaged Paragraph.
Talk:Cicuta douglasii

message: I oppose the proposal to merge this article, Cicuta douglasii, with Cicuta since that article is about the genus of 4 species and this article is about one of those species.  I am removing the tag since it has on there without action or discussion for an extended period of time.  RJFJR (talk) 14:29, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Lerch transcendant

message: This link is a misspelling of Lerch transcendent, see User talk:Linas#Lerch transcendant or Lerch transcendent. Having a misspelled link will lead to missspelled articles containing this link. I request that the link be deleted. Oleg Alexandrov 16:23, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I would argue though that you cannot make a redirect for each mis-spelling in existance. Also, if you make a mis-spelled link, and the link does not exist (redlink) it tells you that something is wrong. If the mis-spelled link is blue, the editor might think nothing is wrong. But either way, I agree with you that it is not a speedy. I will not bother to put this to the Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion. Oleg Alexandrov 03:24, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:The Design Revolution

message: Ian Pitchford rightly deleted the Dembski quotations and correctly identified this article as a "propaganda sheet for the book and should be deleted entirely or merged with he Dembski article." I agree.
It should also be pointed out that the structure of the article, laying out chapter headings with no detailed description of the book's content, no objective analysis of the same, and no mention of how the book was received is way outside both the norm and the guidelines for writing a great article. FeloniousMonk 16:23, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I asked Ian about that and he thought that the quotes were too much.  You can read it from our talk pages.  What do you suggest for improvements? David Bergan 19:41, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Much much much later and ... would suggest a revert WAY back to something like July 2005 that says what the book has.   The article here seems to be sections (1) 2 para general about the book - OK except cite 1 seems a dupe of the generic 'list of societies rejecting ID'; (2) Criticism is just an unsourced list of names, no reason stated these were picked to list, seems just a hook to hang the cite to Perakh blog posting; (3) References, (4) External links which dupes the two Perahk cite and has deaedlinks at the Panda Thumb blog and the UCSD excerpts.    I'll just do some cleanup and leave it to someone else to expand to 2006 substantial material.  Markbassett (talk) 03:39, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV and structure
Talk:Concord Mills

message: i cleaned up the intro paragraph, to make it easier to read and remove unnecessary information.
for example, the fact that southpark is 2nd in size implies it is larger than concord mills, so the phrase that followed explaining that was unnecessary. also i removed the sentence saying no differentiation was made in the visitor statistics between local and "those who travelled a distance" as it, too, was unnecessary and gratuitous. Frijole 19:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  introduction 

message: I just removed the entire layout section.  The main reasons are 1) because it doesn't deserve a separate section of its own and 2) because there's no reference citations anywhere (breaking the rules of no original research).  
Layout shouldn't be it's own section.  The important info should just be added to the main article (without plugging stores) once proper citations are added.  And yes I know the mall is set up in to themes which is interesting and deserving of mention, but you'll need to cite references sources.  Also, even if there were references, why were only two themes highlighted and not the rest?  Why those two?  If you were going to choose any why wouldn't you start with the NASCAR theme (and basketball) since it's the most uniquely relevant to the region?   Feel free to add the theme information back in once somebody finds citation references. --Fife Club (talk) 15:23, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of Layout Section
Talk:Stevie Crawford

message: I've tried to make this more readable, but I'm not sure if I quite understood the original, and some of the original stats might have gotten transcribed incorrectly.  Can someone with sports knowledge check that the information is still accurate?
--Alynna 17:00, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Through the passage of time, this article is currently looking fine. This article gives all the useful information we need. Bobo. 05:08, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: fact check?
Talk:Rockin' in the Free World

message: REmoving the reference to "Don't feel like Satan, but I am to them" being relevant to crack cocaine, since I can't find any evidence of that - and it seems to commonly be a reference to overseas populations Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject)
Results 1 - 10 of about 11 for Sampedro rockin' free world Khomeini. (0.19 seconds) , personally I agree with you, that whole section should be removed - why would you fear about your European tour because Iran was burning American flags anyways?  Sounds like an urban legend - and it's very important that Wikipedia not further misinformation. Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 05:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Khomeini passed away on June 3, 1989, "Rockin' in the Free World" was first performed live on February 21, 1989 at the Paramount Theater, Seattle, WA with Neil Young's band The Restless. So the Khomeni story must be made up or Poncho was watching another flag-burning event on TV.
:I'd suggest the Rushdie Affair - Khomeini's fatwa against The Satanic Verses, calling for Rushdie to be killed, had been pronounced on February 14, and this was instant news and greeted by roaring crowds in Iran and elsewhere in the Middle East. Not sure if there was U.S. flag burning at that point, but does Sampedro or Young actually say the joke was inspired by torched American flags? Even if one of them did, he may have conflated two news stories. Rushdie was, of course, an immediate symbol of freedom of speech and thought.Strausszek (talk) 23:40, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's almost certainly it, considering the timing.  Without a source, it'd be WP:OR to read too much into it, though; I just put the quote there.  Calbaer (talk) 04:30, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the Khomeini reference 

message: Where's the G3 jam?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.194.230.174 (talk) 17:25, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Performances
Talk:Ranchi district

message: ----
A request to all the fellow Wikipedians interested in the development of contents of this page: I shall be adding (say, by end-April/ early-May 2006) some more contents to this page. If some one may add a map and picture/s, the page shall become better. Thanks. --Bhadani 13:06, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:48, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Ice Station

message: The articel as currently writen sounds far more like a publisher's blurb than an encyclopedia article. The closing elipsis in particular is simply a bad idea, IMO. DES 17:28, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You rang Cdinesh? --Stretch 01:34, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I wonder if there's an approved, encyclopedic way to note that an artistic work is complete crap? Teemu Leisti (talk) 16:42, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  crap 

message: "08:06, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warrant Officers in the Australian Army are addressed as 'Sir' 

message: I added the Fact tag because this entire section reads like a personal opinion. Yes, some of these things are impossible but this is a work of fiction. It is not intended to be accurate on every item. Also, why pick only these items as inaccuracies when the piece of military technology with the biggest role in the entire novel (and the other Scarecrow novels), the MagHook, doesn't exist either.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.165.162.164 (talk) 19:34, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Even if not simply personal opinion, the inaccuracies are generally trivial. This has been around a long time without being fixed - if there are no objections, the section should be deleted.MurfleMan (talk) 04:08, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've now deleted the section. MurfleMan (talk) 03:04, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracies 

message: Is this summary from an elementary school essay which was originally intended to be for Battle Royale (film)? 
Where is Wilkes Ice Station? 
Were the French scientists theoretical soldiers at first?
Is Schofield a god? Did he ascend to heaven afterwards?
What attack was the SAS adding to?
I assume Schofield is a god because he killed an entire SAS team...
Is Wendy a mutant, too? 
Why?
What is this summary telling me?
Nightvisiongoggles (talk) 20:34, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary?
Talk:West Singhbhum district

message: ----
----
A request to all the fellow Wikipedians interested in the development of contents of this page: I shall be adding (say, by end-April/ early-May 2006) some more contents to this page. If some one may add a map and picture/s, the page shall become better. Thanks. --Bhadani 13:08, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:59, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:East Singhbhum district

message: A request to all the fellow Wikipedians interested in the development of contents of this page: I shall be adding (say, by end-April/ early-May 2006) some more contents to this page. If some one may add a map and picture/s, the page shall become better. Thanks. --Bhadani 12:57, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:17, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 

message: According to the 2011 census, Bengali is the most spoken language in this district. Someone keeps reverting it to Odia. Anyone who thinks Odia is the most spoken language can they provide credible sources? C1MM (talk) 05:36, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odia or Bengali? 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Jamshedpur district. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 26#Jamshedpur district until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  MB 16:29, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Jamshedpur district" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Gaya district

message: A request to all the fellow Wikipedians interested in the development of contents of this page: I shall be adding (say, by end-April/ early-May 2006) some more contents to this page. If some one may add a map and picture/s, the page shall become better. Thanks. --Bhadani 11:47, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Amraha article says that the village is in Gaya district, but this article does not mention it. Please investigate and fix.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 13:44, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attention to Amraha
Talk:Huniade Castle

message: The castle was destroyed only twice: by an earthquake in 1443 and during the siege of Temesvár (1849). See sources from Timișoara Fortress. Please don't add weasel words and unsourced statements. --Turbojet (talk) 09:57, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Destroyed and rebuilt too many times to mention"
Talk:1967 in film

message: Per 's edit here. While Box Office Mojo may opt for "lifetime" grosses in its totals, in this instance the lifetime gross for The Graduate is more or less a first-run gross because it has only ever had a single release, except for a couple of limited anniversary runs. You can see the breakdown at http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=releases&id=graduate.htm which itemises each release. The Jungle Book on the other hand has had several major releases, itemised at http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=releases&id=junglebook.htm. Honestly, I think this chart has a lot of problems and isn't fit for purpose, but the problems are lower down the chart, not with the top two films. Personally I would restore the historical Variety rentals chart (which can be found in the page history) and is a better representation of contemporary success. Betty Logan (talk) 18:38, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: So neither "The Graduate" nor "The Jungle Book", as listed, are the actual annual take, contrary to what you yourself said was the standard for year pages, & to what the reader would expect for a year page. Instead, you demand looking at other links, without specifying the need to do it & without specifying which films do, & don't, need to have special attention. And on top of that, you expect the casual reader to know the difference between "gross" & "rental", or to even realize there is a difference. And you wonder why I'm changing it.  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 19:26, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: You seem like a pleasant person, TREK. TheLawMan85 (talk) 18:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-releases
Talk:John Paul Tremblay

message: Can anyone tell me how I can out in a wikiquote link for this actor that would link to wikiquote instead of wikiquote's non-existent page on the Actor John Paul Trembley? Sveden 18:16, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Help

message: Shouldn't Cole Harbour be described as a Halifax suburb, since Dartmouth itself is a suburb of Halifax?  Trilobright (talk) 14:30, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Dartmouth Suburb'
Talk:C. Kyle Ranson

message: This article sounds much more like a press release than an entry in an encyclopedia.  --BaronLarf 18:17, July 14, 2005 (UTC)
What suggestions do you have to imporve it?  Guerberj 23:15, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Old Discussion

message: -- I retrived the older version of this artical becasue I felt the new one had a great deal of good information taken out.  Feel free to discuss this change.  Guerberj 19:06, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revisions

message: *Portland Business Journal
*Oregon Business magazine
Aboutmovies (talk) 09:19, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for expansion/citations
Talk:Luigi Cornaro

message: I folded in much of the 1911 Britannica article. It is the Britannica, apparently, that both gives his dates as 1457-1566 and states that he died at 98; the simplest way out for now was to question his birthdate.
:The 1911 Britannica article does not give both dates, only the later one. Changed article to reflect this. Mike Linksvayer (talk) 04:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me and thank you for helping me on this one.  Should the fact that medical/diet health sites are touting Cornaro's works to sell their own products be mentioned in this article? --Polylerus 18:28, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds fine to me; in the lingo of literature and the arts, that's known as "reception", after all.... A favourable spin might even be put on such an addition: Cornaro may be viewed as the ancestor of these modern movements, etc. (At which point that link might come creeping back legitimately! as an illustration of that.) Bill 20:40, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial seed text

message: I'm confused.... is this article about the same person as: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alvise_Cornaro ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.204.100 (talk) 08:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No section 

message: What did he die of?Wythy (talk) 01:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: old age! 174.61.103.43 (talk) 17:26, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  His death
Talk:Khalil al-Wazir

message: The article Mentions that Khalil Alwazir's eldest son Jihad was killed in a car accident in Beirut, the source if this infromation is wrong.
Jihad Alwazir is alive, he lives in Ramallah and he was appointed by president Mahmoud Abbas on December 31st 2007 as governor of the Palestinian Monetary Authority (Alhayat newspaper,  dec. 31st 2007).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nalwazir (talk • contribs) 21:04, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you are correct. I made the change. Thanks! --Al Ameer son (talk) 22:05, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal Life 

message: I do not understand why the  Maariv  1997 report is given such prominence. Barak´s involvement was known, (or rather, more formally; "alleged",) long before that. In fact already in 1988, see e.g. in Time magazine: Middle East Assignment: Murder. That article is much, much more detailed than the Maariv  "revelation" 11 years later. Regards, Huldra (talk) 10:16, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assassination
Talk:Michael Modest

message: This is alright for a start. I added his finisher to it. He deserves more than just a paragraph.
Rawisrob 16:15, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So, I can't find this move to link to, but the Reality Check wasn't a Vertebreaker/Kudo Driver/etc. It was an Air Raid Crash. 50.203.70.200 (talk) 22:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs expanding

message: There needs to be more info (or at least a mention) of his WCW stint near its closing.
: ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 20:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WCW
Talk:Charles Seely (politician, born 1803)

message: Before the copyvio was tagged, myself and User:Morwen had produced a cleaned-up version that shouldn't violate copyright. It's at Meelar (talk) 18:52, July 14, 2005 (UTC)
I am the wrote the original entry.  The 2nd version at Charles Seely/Temp seems fine.
----
Has anyone fact-checked this article? It claims that this guy was the Father of the House of Commons for a period, but that article would seem to disagree. Ambi 15:29, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Slyck Wagner Brown

message: Per discussion with administrator User:Durova, the Jonathan Barber (banned User:JB196) namecheck is being taken out as a violation of WP:VAIN, WP:SPAM, and WP:OWN SirFozzie 17:48, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Jonathan Barber Namecheck taken out

message: Why are all references to his arrest after his assault on April Hunter removed? It's a significant part of his biography. 174.54.72.211 (talk) 10:06, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrest
Talk:Uttar Pradesh

message: Several editors have inserted advertisements, details about under-construction projects, and other content, completely disregarding the guidelines (GA) for the article. I have excluded these sections and will continue to oversee such edits. Please contribute constructively, refraining from unnecessarily lengthening the article or creating subsections for just a few sentences. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 16:47, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please refrain from turning this article into a Hindu vs Muslim or the best state of India debate. Achieving GA (Good Article) status requires significant time and effort. Introducing advertisements and numerous pro-government edits may jeopardize the article's GA status. Therefore, kindly avoid making edits that do not serve the purpose of informing its readers. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 03:38, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV Edits 

message: I am proposing a replacement of Lathmar Holi with the Kashi Vishwanath Temple I am aware of the current political situation of the monument however this is an important site in the state. Holi is a celebration so having a monument in the infobox would be better. I am also not sure how important the New Yamuna Bridge is. SKAG123 (talk) 23:01, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 19:50, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacing Lathmar Holi with Kashi Vishwanath Temple 

message: Shivambellale (talk) 13:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 February 2024 

message: Can someone help me understand why IP/ New users want this article to be about Hinduism? Also, info-box images are supposed to reflect the gist of the article. They should include flora/fauna, architecture, geography, culture, festivals, to name a few. I have reiterated this in the past and wouldn't mind saying it again. Please feel free to make significant changes, but do not convert this article into being all about Hinduism. Such edits will be reverted if brought to attention. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 20:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  All About Hinduism and Hindu Temples 

message: Please change
== See also ==
* 
to
== See also ==

Currently the template is in a list. MickGarner (talk) 17:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: , - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 17 May 2024