Talk:Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron

message: Someone contributed the information below at some point. I'm not sure how to merge it into the article properly - it seems more like this info would be more relevent at an article about Kinger mustangs themselves. I'm sticking it in the Talk in case anyone wants to have a go at revising or moving it sometime. --Sparky the Seventh Chaos 23:26, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC)
"There were no "Kingers" (or "Kigers" either) in the western US in those days! Most of the stock there, and then, was descended from the Conquistador's war horses(the true, pure Spanish mustangs, not the B.L.M.'s mixed modern breeds of today), and possibly the ponies of the early Norse explorers(the Indian's pintos). Some mustangs may even have traced back to horses brought over by the Phoenicians (that were origionaly imported by these ancient seafarers from Iberia, so they were also Spanish). Contact the University of Kentucky for an analysis of the genetics of the modern Kiger horse breed."
It does not belong here. Plus, in the fictional work of Spirit: Stallion of the Cimmaron, Spirit is referred to as a Kiger Mustang. Despite the questionable historic accuracy, it is a movie and the Kiger comment is canon. Wolfie the Marshmallow 22:55, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kinger mustangs 

message: Although it's not a Disney movie,it still has the crappy reverse racism and peace-and-love new age junk.
    Are you a racist? Honestly, racists are CRAP Do you mind if I delete your 'post'? And what does this have to do with the actual article???? Oh, and you need psychiatric help by the way. What's wrong with 'peace-and-love' 'new age' "junk"? Oh, and peace and love are not new age. They have been around since time immemorial. AND you should sign your post with those little curly things below the esc button on your keyboard. If you push SHIFT, then they will come up. If you aren't a member, that will sign with your IP code.MorwenofLossarnarch 01:58, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't feed the trolls. :) This post is fairly old now, anyway. --Sparky Lurkdragon 12:29, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reeks of Los Angeles political correctness 

message: To the jerk who vandalized this article, get a life. No one want's to see your sick fantacies. please, either stick to the plot or leave Wikipedia. Thank you.
--D-hyo 17:24, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalized 

message: A lot of people on sites such as DeviantART, Fanart-Central etc have adopted the style of artwork the movie has over the past years - an overwhelming amount of people, actually. It is often called "Spirit Style." I didn't see it mentioned anywhere (maybe I'm blind) and I don't know if it is really relevant or not, I just thought it might be interesting to add. It might be part of the Popular Culture section or something.. I don't know, as I said it might not be worth mentioning, I just wanted to put it out there.  Magischerr (talk) 06:13, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this worth mentioning? 

message: Condensed the first few paragraphs a lot.. but it doesn't even show. Ughh I am feeling pretty lazy right now so I gave up. If anyone else is even paying attention to this article, I encourage you to edit much more.. the Plot section was waaay too descriptive in my opinion, it was more of a storytelling than a summary. Yeah, I know.. this article isn't important, but whatever. Luloah. (talk) 12:39, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Section 

message: Can someone delete the controversy section?  Not only is none of it cited, which makes me think it was probably fabricated, but to call this film a piece of "Native American revisionism" because it portrays the US cavalry treating the Lakota tribe unfavorably is pretty much the same calling Holocaust films "Jewish revisionism" because the Nazis are the bad guys.  The (broken) Treaty of Fort Laramie and the Wounded Knee Massacre actually, y'know, happened.  To the tribe in question.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.190.159.148 (talk) 17:32, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Controversy" 

message: This movie needs a franchise site after all the TV series and Specials on Netflix. That would make it much esaier to navigate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pederjo99 (talk • contribs) 03:37, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Franchise site 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140306063936/http://www.visualeffectssociety.com/ves-awards/previous/1st-annual to http://www.visualeffectssociety.com/ves-awards/previous/1st-annual
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160818202739/http://www.youngartistawards.org/noms24.htm to http://www.youngartistawards.org/noms24.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:41, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified