lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Thermophoresis

message: article is stub class Cinnamon colbert 20:35, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub class

message: Do merge Thermomigration with this article. They talk about exactly the same thing. EIFY (talk) 18:10, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge completed. The article could use some work. Merry Christmas.  Stan J. Klimas (talk) 19:46, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work. Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 20:34, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Thermomigration merge

message: The first sentence of the lead section refers to "the force of a temperature gradient."  I know a temperature gradient is, and I'm familiar with the force from a pressure gradient, but not from a temperature gradient.  Is it the same as the Thermophoretic force described in the first section?  This needs to be cleared up in the article. --TSchwenn (talk) 01:22, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The force of a temperature gradient 

message: I just created an article at thermal transpiration which was redlinked, but I noticed this article and reading it, it appears that it may be closely related to this article. Should these be merged as well? The distinction seems to be:
* Soret effect describes the thermal gradient force on colloidal particles in a solution, IIUC.
* Thermal transpiration describes thermal gradient force on gaseous particles, mainly observed in rarefied gases.
There are of course many other thermal gradient-induced transport effects (Seebeck effect for instance) and I'm not sure that they all deserve to be in the same article. --Nanite (talk) 19:46, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  also gaseous diffusion (thermal transpiration)?
Talk:Walter Sydney Adams

message: This page says Adams observed gravitational redshift in 1925. At https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_experimental_errors_and_frauds_in_physics it says Adams' 1924 result was considered to be in error. Which page is correct? I'm not familiar with this subject.
76.152.182.21 (talk) 06:52, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gravitional redshift validity
Talk:Unreal Anthology

message: This Anthology is missing Unreal Tournament 2003 *completely*.  That should be mentioned / talked about by someone who knows why this was omitted. --68.46.109.190 09:03, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To my knowledge, Unreal Tournament 2004 includes all of Unreal Tournament 2003.  Epic took a lot of flak over this, especially after it turned out that 2004 wasn't network compatible with 2003 like Epic said it would be. --Powerlord 18:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "includes all of" is an innapropriate label. UT2004 builds on top of UT2003, while removing some features of the movement (ie extreme boost dodging) that allowed you to get to certain places you normally couldn't, more powerful hitscan, adding back in the sniper rifle, removing armor stacking, and scaling changes, along with different netcode. They couldnt be considered the same game if lots of people in the community still have many differing views on them, which they still do. 216.188.251.229 (talk) 22:32, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreal Tournament 2003

message: Hey you are forgetting something, in the UT 2004 article it says that the Editor's Choice edition has Mods, yet you forgot to state that the UT 2004 Editor's Choice plus Mega Bonus Pack in Unreal Anthology does not have any mods. I added it and if im worng, can you tell me how to get the mods off the dvd disk.--E-119 22:06, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queston on Editor's Choice Stuff 

message: Where i can found the Linux executables for Unreal Anthology Edition?
4 January 2007
- Sorry, but Linux not supported for Unreal Anthology. See here.ResurgamII 02:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you read the entire thread, not just the one post, you'll see that someone has put together Linux installers for Unreal Tournament and Unreal Gold, for the Unreal Anthology disc.  And the user says he's working on installers for Unreal 2 and UT2004.  So there are installers being made, but they aren't official.   --Brandon Myers 06:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linux
Talk:Ding Dong

message: Note: 
Looks like the new Hostess has mad a change to the renewed Ding Dongs that needs to be documented. They are now much smaller. 2 1/4" down from 3" and thinner too. :(  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.80.149.76 (talk) 18:19, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Change

message: "Term first used by François Rabelais as the character name of a silly, arrogant, seafaring sheepherder.[3] Search for DingDong. Similar origination of the term fiddle-faddle."
The first sentence is not a sentence.  The second doesn't seem to belong. The third seems irrelevant. Danchall (talk) 21:13, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Writing needs repair

message: http://chp.wikia.com/wiki/Frank_Poncherello
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHiPs
Throughout the series you can see one of the main characters multiple times eating and also handling ding dongs and its packaging.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:6:175C:9D54:39F5:198:37E8:7ECE (talk) 22:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ding Dongs in CHiPs 

message: At one time, what is now the normal size Ring Ding cake was referred to as "Ring Ding Junior' while in vending machines, a Ring Ding the size of a very small cake was simply called 'Ring Ding'. Unfortunately, I have only my own memories to back this up. Gojirob (talk) 16:07, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember that too.  There are some mentions on the web (it's "Ring Ding Jr.", not "Ring Ding Junior"), but on a quick search I didn't see a reliable source. Dan Bloch (talk) 19:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Ring Dings variants
Talk:Yellowworld

message: Is there a reputable source that lists the demographics of this site, Yellowworld.org; its members/moderators? I know they had a feud with Blacktokyo.com (a black-American owned site, about blacks in Japan) awhile back, and I know they tend to harass or demean blacks that become temporary members. 
From my own experience, as a black-American who joined the site and was himself harassed by members and moderators, I know they were partial (and lenient) to white members; and to whites in general. I think it’s interesting, not only research-wise, but in an ironic sense seeing that the site--according to the article--fought for injustices done to Asians.--Joel Lindley (talk) 19:59, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Demographics
Talk:List of conflicts in Asia

message: Mention needs to be made of the 1956 Sino-Burmese border War.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregory NZL (talk • contribs) 11:15, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Let me be clear, Indo-Bagladesh is a conflict between two sovereign states and that is why it is included. Your repeated removals of this conflict and the addition of Tibet conflict clear reflects your POV. You are entitled to your own POV but Wikipedia has a policy of neutrality. Nirvana888 (talk) 17:28, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

text: Your criterion on what is "minor" or not has no value or credibility nor does the assertion that something "minor" does not deserve to be listed. Let's be clear, the status quo version of the article contained this conflict. You are the one trying to apply your own opinion to the article by removing the conflict against consensus. I frankly have no interest in the history of Asian conflicts and which state gets into conflict with which one. Nirvana888 (talk) 17:43, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicts in PRC 

message: ROC is Taiwan's official name  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.88.37 (talk) 14:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taiwan is the Republic of China 

message: The Kurukshetra War isn't yet proved to be a real battle and is still a part of the mythology of the Mahabharata, so it wouldn't be appropriate to add a mythological conflict in a article dedicated to conflicts of the world Master Sam 77 (talk) 15:12, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Kurukshetra War]] 
Talk:Thomas Addison

message: Did Thomas Addison recieve a knighthood? Some internet sources refer to him as Sir Thomas Addison.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.239.137.195 (talk) 13:21, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia doesn't use honorifics. Rissa, copy editor (talk) 06:17, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sir Thomas Addison?

message: While this is given in the ODNB as Hanxwell, it begins to look as if it should be Hauxwell. Reports are that her first husband was W. W. Hanxwell: FreeBMD makes William Wing Hauxwell died 1841 likely. William (Wing) Hauxwell, 1797 - 1841 on https://www.myheritage.com/names/william_hauxwell is a very good match. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=S_4dAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA117 is from a self-published book, so not RS, but is circumstantial. 
Since Hanxwell is presumably a typo, I'll change it now in the article. Charles Matthews (talk) 16:42, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wife's name
Talk:Balboa Stadium

message: I'm fairly certain the stadium was demolished in 1985-76 due to the general earthquake retrofit that SDHS went through at the time, and then rebuilt to its current much smaller status. I'll check for additional documentation though. Etcetera 22:17, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That would have been Lane Field, where the PCL Pads played before moving to Westgate Park. Wschart (talk) 02:32, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Above Bar

message: Above Bar isn't really a district of Southampton.  Above Bar Street is a street, but the area it's in is simply the city centre.  I'm very skeptical over whether this article should exist (but have held fire on a WP:AFD so far).  Can anyone convince me? Waggers 22:17, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Time to take some action - see the discussion at Talk:Southampton City Centre. Waggers 12:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  District?
Talk:2001 Maniacs

message: 1) A cursory internet search only returns IMDB and other unaccaptable 2ndary sources
2) The IMDB reference and others do not meet notability guidelines per WP:NOTFLLM
3) There is no  full-length featured newspaper articles from large circulation newspapers or full-length magazine reviews and criticism reviewing the film.
4) The film appears not to be widely distributed in the US and it has not received full length reviews by two or more nationally known critics. 
5) The film is not historically notable.
6) The film was is not considered notable by a broad survey of film critics, academics, or movie professionals. 
7) The film has not bee featured as part of a documentary, program, or retrospective on the history of cinema. 
8) The film has not received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.
9) The film has not been selected for preservation in a national archive.
10) As far as a internet search is concerned, the film is not "taught" as a subject at an accredited university or college with a notable film program. 
11) The film does not represent a unique accomplishment in cinema, a milestone in the development of film art, or contributes significantly to the development of United States cinema. 
I beleive this film should be given a prod tag. It does not meet notability requirements of WP:NOTFLLM and should be nominated for deletion. Barton Foley (talk) 16:54, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: The plot is way too short and needs to be expanded. Also more information needs to be added to the production section with samples of reviews on the film by notable critics.--Paleface Jack (talk) 23:14, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: This article is missing important information on the film's production, release, and reception. These are very important need to be added to the article with information on the film's theatrical, and home media releases, and reviews from notable critics added to the article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 17:13, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Information 

message: Hindi 103.219.47.129 (talk) 15:02, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2001 manacos
Talk:Defective matrix

message: I think this page should be merged with its antonym, diagonalizable matrix. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 14:48, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Hi Plastikspork. I see you reverted my change to the simple example. Could you explain your reasoning? You said "It was already a simple example". My objection to the original example was that it was singular (not simple), which I thought might be confusing.--catslash (talk) 00:18, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't revert your example entirely.  I just changed it to something a bit more simple.  I agree that the singular one wasn't so good.  This article actually needs a bit of help.  There is no mention of the connection to the Jordan canonical form and the defective property of a general Jordan block.  Thanks for your help. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:58, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I didn't look very carefully at what you'd done - too hasty with my indignation. --catslash (talk) 09:07, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Singular example

message: Does a defective matrix truly need to be square?  In other words, non-diagonalizable matrices can be found which are not square (all of these, in fact), and also not diagonalizable, which seems to be the word sense of "defective".  Since failing diagonalization is a trait not limited to square matrices, it seems artificial to limit these matrices to being square.  Are there different conventions on this, or is there some other terminology which helps clarify the status of these non-square matrices with respect to the definition of defective matrix?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.139.254.117 (talk) 06:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: For a matrix to have eigenvectors, it must represent a linear transformation of a finite-dimensional vector space into itself and hence must be a square matrix.  Note also from the lead that a defective matrix "is therefore not diagonalizable."  This is a result—not the definition.  The inference does not hold in the other direction, that is, a matrix which is not diagonalizable is not necessarily a defective matrix.  For more information about eigenvectors, see most any linear algebra textbook.  For more information about defective matrices, see Golub and Van Loan.—Anita5192 (talk) 07:41, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Square matrix?
Talk:James Scobie

message: Date of birth
There is an apparent problem with James's date of birth. James had an older brother George
(http://www.eurekapedia.org/George_Scobie; also Peter Fitzsimons "Eureka: The Unfinished Rebellion", William Heinemann Australia, edition of 2013, p.221). George died in 1874 aged 45, according to his tombstone (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/197997157/george-scobie), which is consistent with the birth year of 1829 in the Eurekapedia entry for George. So James was not born in 1826.
Does anyone have information about this? GammaTwo (talk) 06:06, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Murder mile

message: I've linked Upper Clapton and History of Nicosia here, that enough to warrant this interesting article being un-'orphaned'? -Kez 22:30, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Anon users keep adding the line above. Wikipedia is only for information you can establish the notability of and can provide a cite for. Please don't re-add without a cite. ciphergoth (talk) 17:23, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  London Road Purfleet West Thurrock England 

message: I think this page should be a page in its own right, not a disambiguation page.  There is a link here from the page Oliver's Army because the song refers to Belfast during the Troubles, but Wikipedia has no page I've found for Belfast during the Troubles, so this page makes the most sense as the destination link.  I think the page could be expanded, likely into a stub, to give more context and possibly more examples. Zhumadian (talk) 14:44, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
Talk:Nancy Skinner (commentator)

message: FAIR COMMENT ABOUT NANCY SKINNER
1. Skinner announced she was a candidate for 2004 Illinois Senate (this was in 2003) and was promptly canned by WLS AM-890 Chicago.  She should have expected that she would not be permitted to keep her show and run for office.
2. Skinner was anti-Bush long before it was "cool" to be that way, whatever that means.  The show, which started with the Monica Lewinsky debacle, was basically comprised of Ski Anderson and Nancy Skinner apologizing for Bill Clinton's peccadilloes... until George W. Bush was first rumored to be seeking the Presidency.  Then it was just anti-Bush, anti-Bush, all the way to the end.  Ya gotta love it, because you just can't like it.
UNFAIR COMMENT ABOUT NANCY SKINNER
She placed seventh in a field of eight Democrats seeking Illinois Senate in 2004.  She actually lost to a teacher (not a good sign).  She received about 20,000 votes.  Hey, if you don't beat Barak Hussein Obama in an election with all of the national attention he has, fine, no criticism.  But to lose to him and six other people, that's not a good sign, especially if you are a well-known person on the radio and TV.
POSITIVE COMMENT ABOUT NANCY SKINNER
She is beautiful... absolutely radiant.  The camera loves her, which is more than I can say about Catherine Johns.  She has a good voice for radio.
Jessemckay 21:47, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:University of Chichester

message: (I'm posting this to all articles on UK universities as so far discussion hasn't really taken off on Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities.)
There needs to be a broader convention about which university rankings to include in articles. Currently it seems most pages are listing primarily those that show the institution at its best (or worst in a few cases). See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Universities#University ratings. Timrollpickering 22:35, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: University ratings

message: You may be interested this article has been proposed for deletion. --Bduke 11:35, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[University of Chichester Students' Union]]
Talk:Coventry University

message: I'd be grateful if somebody could add something about the Queen's Anniversary Prizes for Higher and Further Education recently awarded to Coventry University's Institute for Advanced Manufacturing & Engineering:  . I won't, as I'm currently employed at the University. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:00, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Placing this under the Awards subsection of the Academic profile section. Regards,  Spintendo  16:50, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queen’s Anniversary Prizes  

message: Coventry University has a new campus, at Wroclaw, Poland . Could someone add something about this, please? (I am employed as Wikimedian in Residence at Coventry University.) Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:38, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Dylsss (talk) 17:15, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry I missed this at the time; and thank you. There is also now a campus in Greenwich, London: . Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:34, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

text: I'm sure it would be fine for you to add this in yourself, it seems pretty uncontroversial.  Seagull123  Φ  23:19, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you; that's done. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:37, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wroclaw 

message: The current date of Coventry Polytechnic is 1987, this is incorrect. I entered Coventry (Lanchester) Polytechnic in 1983 and completed my degree 3 years later in 1986 (I received credit for my industry year beforehand). Some long standing lecturers near retirement handed out photocopies with the Lanchester name another Coventry (Lanchester) was more common. My degree certificate was awarded in the summer of 1986 is formerly titled Coventry Polytechnic (no mention of Lanchester). I am not exactly sure, when Coventry Polytechnic superseded Lanchester, it was before 1987. Does anyone know of proper formal records, in order to correct the Coventry Polytechnic date here in Wikipedia?   dmode (talk) 09:29, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coventry Polytechnic superseded Lanchester before 1987... 

message: "The Graham Sutherland building was the main building for the Art and Design faculty. It has since been demolished and replaced with the Delia Derbyshire building."
I'm not in any way saying that is incorrect, but it doesn't appear to be supported by any source I can find, certainly not this one. Harfarhs (talk) 22:00, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graham Sutherland building
Talk:Monte Carlo method in statistical mechanics

message: Shouldn't this article be called "Monte Carlo methods in statistical physics"?  False vacuum (talk) 00:18, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know. The main  Monte Carlo  article is in the singular, even if its first line is "Monte Carlo methods are a class...".--Daniel (talk) 11:21, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change?
Talk:Ray Ellington

message: Strange item in the lede, not represented in the main article either. It says he could speak with no attempt to change his normal accent, as a female secretary or a Scotsman.
:What does this mean? Valetude (talk) 18:45, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It means what it says - he played the parts using his normal voice. It may help to be familiar with Goon-style humour. Onanoff (talk) 15:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accent 

message: Any ideas on how he chose it; cf. the Duke.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.155.237.221 (talk) 11:34, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: stage-name
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mixed martial arts/Article improvement drive

message: Ok, so the first article for us to work on is the flagship, mixed martial arts.  Anybody want to sum up what this article needs?  I see that the rules section needs to be split out.  What else?  I have basically no experience with moving articles past B-level.   SubSeven 22:36, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, first of all, we need to stick this on the talk page of the relevant article, namely talk:Mixed martial arts, which I have done.   The to-do list is already there and I've thrown my name on it under a title of "contributors to MMA COTW".   Reading WP:GA?, it boils down to a) quality of writing, b) citing sources and staying clear of original research, c) not getting bogged down in trivia, d) staying neutral, e) the article is edit war free, f) a number of relevant images and g) it is under 25 kb in length.   If I'm firing the first bullet, under criteria c, we can trim down the Rules variations section considerably. -- Crazyknight 23:39, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First collaboration

message: It looks like this drive has stalled.  I'd just like to say that if we do get it going again at some point, I suggest something longer than a one-week cycle.  I don't think we have the manpower to revamp an article in one week.  SubSeven 07:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I started the drive and then absolutely nobody responded when it came time to do the work.   Some people seem to have done work on it whilst I was on wiki-holiday.   Yes, I can scale this back and change it.   i.e. close nominations until the first collaboration is done and then change the relevant templates. Also, I should put a quick how-to together to show how to do things on it. - Crazyknight 16:51, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Any more?