lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Alexander Hotel (St. Petersburg, Florida)

message: That's highly improbable, despite the source, which I guess I'm officially questioning. Demens died in January of 1919 and had moved out of Florida for California long before then. How could he built the hotel, first, in the month that he died, and two, from all the way in California at a time when travel still took a long time and all of the logistical problems that are associated with that. This needs some verification. Maybe the year is wrong. Several websites and the source site Demens, but http://www.nationalregisterofhistoricplaces.com/FL/Pinellas/state.html lists Carson, A. as the possible builder. Strange.--RossF18 (talk) 04:45, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "It was built by Peter Demens in 1919"
Talk:I Am Not an Animal

message: Is the term 'miniseries' really appropriate? In British television six episodes of thirty minutes is precisely the standard. If this series is mini, then most other British ones are too, which I don't think really makes much sense. — TheJames 15:51, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Six episodes is a pretty standard time for a British TV series, I think calling it a miniseries would be incorrect and implying that the American system is the norm everywhere, which is clearly untrue. So I have changed that bit. LupusCanis 11:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Affair at Little Egg Harbor

message: This article is confusing. If "only 5 of his quarry were left alive" then how was Pulaski able to bring his mounted troops up? Were they camped somewhere else? --Awiseman 15:54, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article and infobox had said that October 16 was the date of the battle, but all sources agree that the battle's combat began at dawn on October 15.Analogdrift (talk) 07:09, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Tonk State

message: I have known muslim Rohillas and hindu rohillas.Now I find muslim Tonks.I know tonks to be hindus as well.can some one clear the mess?
ramesh rohilla
the inhabitants of the state are Hindu, just the rulers where Meslim as most of the Rohillas and Muslim population fled to Pakistan.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.63.220.145 (talk) 19:30, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The third paragraph reads "The princely state enjoyed an estimated revenue of £77,000/-; ".  What is the "/" doing there?  In a monetary context, it usually means shillings.  Does this mean that the revenue was 77,000 pounds, or 77,000 shillings?  Or something else?
Maproom 18:38, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 77,000 pounds sterling and zero shillings (the oblique stroke is a way of separating pounds from shillings.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 06:23, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  £77,000/- 

message: PLZ GIVE THE DETAILS OF ABRAR BEGUM DAUGHTER OF IBRAHIM ALI KHAN AND LADLI BEGUM I'M THE GRAND GRAND SON OF HER SAHABZADA MOIN-ULLAH-KHAN S/O SAHABZADA MATEEN-ULLAH-KHAN.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.71.5.59 (talk) 06:56, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NA INSAFI
Talk:2006 National League Championship Series

message: *The quotes in the quotes sections are too pro-Mets.{{subst:image source|Image:2006 NLCS Logo.png)) Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 23:21, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mets Quotes 
Talk:Cheating in casinos

message: This article seems to completely ignore cheating against the player by the casino. Or "rigging" the game 24.207.135.48 (talk) 03:15, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - changing. Zargulon (talk) 13:59, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slanted article
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Paranormal/Collaboration

message: Maybe I'm being dense, but why were BFRO and Valentich Disappearance both deemed to be unsuccessful nominations? They both had a 'for' vote. Shouldn't one, or both, of them been considered the next collaboration of the month? --Careax 05:57, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you notice in the procedures, there's a three-vote threshold for something to be made the Collab of the Month. The thinking behind this is that if not even three people vote for something (especially considering that users can vote for as many nominations as they'd like), then it is unlikely that the nom has the support of a large segment of the project, and thus unlikely to actually be 'collaborated' on. Believe me, I'm not pleased about this, but this seems to be the only thing to do under the circumstances. --InShaneee 06:03, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, ok. Fair enough. Shame we can't instill more enthusiasm or garner more attention on the Paranormal Collab of the Month concept. But one can only do so much. --Careax 06:15, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. You have no idea how hard it was not to spend the last week spamming member to just go and vote. It started out so strong, too! --InShaneee 06:16, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can things be re-nominated?  If so, I'm putting BFRO back in the race.  Ninetywazup?Review meMy ToDo 17:18, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They can, but only if it their situation has changed (ie, the page has been significantly edited, a major dispute has been resolved, ect); otherwise, they're expected to fail for whatever reasons they initially failed. Anyway, that's rather academic at the moment, since what really matters is getting people involved/excited about the collab again, or else anything that gets nominated will fail. --InShaneee 02:57, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsuccessful collaborations?
Talk:Friedrich Wöhler

message: For reference: 
extensive original obituary and biography of Wohler in "Obituary Notices of Fellows Deceased", Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (1885), Volume 35, 01 Jan 1883, Pages xii-
 openURL link
-- phoebe 16:13, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference

message: The article page says: Friedrich Wöhler. "Ueber künstliche Bildung des Harnstoffs". Annalen der Physik und Chemie 37 (1): 330.  The correct citation is: 
Friedrich Wöhler. "Ueber künstliche Bildung des Harnstoffs". Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 1828, 87(2), 253-256. (Year = 1828, Volume = 87, Issue = 2, pages 253-256.)  
The document PDF itself is available from Wiley journals on-line here (subscription required).
Volume 37, Issue 1, page 330 makes no sense for Annalen.  Volume 37 was 1811; there is no page 300 in Issue 1; however, 1811, 37(2) page 300 is the middle of an article by Jacob Berzelius, "VERSUCH die bestimmten und einfachen Verhältnisse aufzufinden, nach welchen die Bestandtheile der unorganischen Natur mit einander verbunden sind". AdderUser (talk) 00:12, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right and you would be able to change it yourself.--Stone (talk) 05:33, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct citation for "About the Artificial Formation of Urea" 

message: The following sentence has no meaning to chemists: 
"obtaining the metal nickel in a state of purity"
If one mixes nickel with, say, carbon 1:1 it is in one state of purity. If one mixes it 99:1, it is in another state of purity. And so on. I will therefore remove this claim from the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.151.171.84 (talk) 00:22, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Nickel in a state of purity

message: Oersted did not fail to isolate aluminium. He succeeded, as described here:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/15938.pdf
I have amended this article accordingly. 
Marchino61 (talk) 03:50, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Isolation of Aluminium by Oersted 

message: — Assignment last updated by Asand25 (talk) 21:23, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Honors Organic Chemistry I
Wikipedia talk:XfD proposal

message: This is not such a good idea, and goes straight against established practice of the past five years or so. Requiring a consensus to keep things would make it too easy for people to gang up and get rid of things they don't like - such as that silly children's card game, that village you've never been to, or any number of articles on religion. It would thus force a lot of people to angrily keep watch over AFD all the time to make sure their items of interest were kept, and that's not a healthy environment to encourage new users to join. >Radiant< 16:14, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Eh? Ok. ~ Flameviper 19:07, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

message: This article is cruft, only physicists know of or care about string theory. Laura
Keep, this nomination is odd. Not bad faith, but string theory is very important. Joe 
Keep per above. Mike (author of article)
:Note to closing admin-Mike is the author of this article. -Sam
Delete. I've never heard about string theory. Chris
Delete per WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of information. Sam
Keep, this is a stupid AfD. Sue 
This deletion was accepted because no consensus was reached.
See the problem? -Amarkov babble 02:32, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Um. Oh, good God, yes. This is shite. I apologise for this insult to mankind. ~ Flameviper 14:26, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: String theory
Talk:Doran

message: Does any body know the orignal meaning? or birth place of this name?
As the article says, it is from the Irish for "descendant of the Exile". I am concerned about the article - it is lifted verbatim from a book called Irish Families by McLysaght and is an infringement of copyright. Saineolai.
  I always thought Doran was German ,, This is what relatives have told me..4/2010  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.111.250.72 (talk) 00:51, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gallup's List of Most Widely Admired People of the 20th Century

message: This page certainly seems to be vandalized. "Charlie the Unicorn" appearing as the 14th most admired person of the 20th century as an aggregate of Gallup polls?The18thbeatle (talk) 04:45, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalized 

message: Why is Ganhdi on here twice 1 and 14? 24.74.131.39 (talk) 08:54, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ganhdi
Talk:Alice Borchardt

message: Does anyone know if she ever finished or will be published post-humously the third of the trilogy on Guinevere?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.5.218.30 (talk) 19:50, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have never been able to find an actual published book of The Winter King. I have found one link through BookFinder.com that brings you to a page at Amazon.de that allows you to order a book that is currently not in stock and I cant understand anything on the page even after translating it. 75.44.33.143 (talk) 17:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alice's trilogy on Guinevere 

message: From this page alone it's clear that her books are historical romance and werewolf fiction (novels). And it's not clear they are fantasy or historical novels or horror fiction except insofar as historical romance and werewolf fiction imply. Do they engage historical events or societies importantly? Is horror an important effect?
--P64 (talk) 17:33, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: We should somehow link to coverage of Arthurian and Celtic themes in modern fiction. Portal:King Arthur; Celtic paganism or keyword Druid.  don't find any corresponding novelist/writer categories. --P64 (talk) 17:40, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre
Talk:Bene Ephraim

message: changed "re-emergence of this community" to "emergence of this community". I have no doubt of their sincerity or desire to be Jewish, and to be recognized as such, nor do I doubt that they devoted to Judaism in practice and affiliation. However, from what I understand of them, there is no evidence of their having had Jewish antecedents. Therefore, they should be actegorized as a group of Telugu-speaking Indians who are seeking to become Jewish.ShmorgelBorgel 16:35, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  Tomertalk 10:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In retrospect, I should change my "agreed" to "I agree, inasmuch as they seek recognition as Jews", to clarify that I take no position on the il/legitimacy of their historical claims.  I have insufficient data to support or disregard their claims, only insufficient data to validate them.  Tomertalk 09:56, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Relies much on Kulanu website, which has been unavailable. Other sources should be used.Parkwells (talk) 14:20, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs more sources
Talk:Wagon Wheels

message: omg omg omg omg omg, no no no!!! must not be merged! deserves its own article!Daniel625 23:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Moon pie]]

message: According to this article, the original Wagon Wheel factory is in Slough and the guy who invented it is, according to his own page, Canadian.  Yet somehow the biscuit is Australian?  Huh?  Bombot 09:21, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have edited it to put things more clearly. GraemeLeggett 10:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing

message: It might be worth mentioning that Wagon Wheels were amongst the first "western" snacks available in Russia after the "democratization" of early 1990's. -- Wesha (talk) 21:13, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Back in USSR 

message: Quote: >> The biscuits were first launched during the 1940s [...] The name was derived from the fact that the Wild West was very popular at time, and in particular the film Wagon Train. <<
Two problems with the last part of this statement: 1) Wagon Train (which was not a film but a TV series) started its run in 1957; 2) the film Wagon Master, which inspired Wagon Train, was shown for the first time in 1950. -- Picapica (talk) 08:49, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: The article starts by describing it as snack food with a link to snack. Whereas this is correct, it would be more accurate to describe it as "junk food" and link it to the relevant wikipedia article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:C409:DA00:55EC:401D:D824:6615 (talk) 07:15, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of the term "snack food"

message: I have a clear memory of buying Weston Waggon Wheels from a country shop in Wiltshire about 1954/1955. This date is earlier than given in the article  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.76.190.163 (talk) 18:08, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  When were Waggon Wheels first sold in the UK
Talk:Arnott's Group

message: what about Nik Nax they were arnott's and just disappeared of the planet  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.6.118.189 (talk) 01:01, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: They appear to be the same thing. Why are they sold under two different names? In Melbourne you can buy both from most large supermarkets. This deserves a section.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.101.221.239 (talk) 06:33, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Link between Savoy and Jatz biscuits

message: 203.206.102.86 has added clarification of the mergers between Arnott's, Menz, Brockhoff & Guests to become the Australian Biscuit Co, which then became Arnott's Biscuits Pty Ltd. Much tidier, Thanks.The Dart (talk) 13:43, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification of mergers

message: Many missing products. But I reuse to waste time again adding them as I have no acceptable links to provide documentation.
Arnotts also had a chip division started at the end of the 60s and early 70s. Many popular products vanished after the mergers.
210.185.119.171 (talk) 13:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Many missing products
Talk:Plat Mallar

message: This page should be merged into a character list per WP:FICT or better yet, moved to Wookipedia. Pascal.Tesson 16:37, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Hello Star Wars experts,
this article is nearly orphaned, and it is unclear whether it fulfills the notability criteria. A user has suggested above that the article should be merged or transwikied. Could you advise where to it should be merged? Please add your comments below. --B. Wolterding 10:38, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article should be merged to List of minor Star Wars characters. While he appears in all three novels of the Black Fleet Crisis, the character is minor and certainly does not merit an article of his own. -- wacko2 21:32, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your help! I will merge the article. --B. Wolterding 08:28, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability + merge options
Talk:Higher-order abstract syntax

message: I have just restructured the article using the current text only (no additions or removals), but it is still not optimal. I have named the first section Relation to first-order abstract syntax, but it has two purposes:
* define higher-order abstract syntax
* show how it relates to first-order abstract syntax
I think it is better to split these concepts. -- eboy 16:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure of the article

message: I think the first sentence of this section is overly broad.  Simply using metalevel binders for object level binding isn't sufficient to classify as "higher-order abstract syntax".  For instance, this metalevel binding technique is used widely in nominal term embeddings, yet nominal embeddings are first-order, not higher-order.
In fact, the article doesn't make clear what, to me, is the defining feature of HOAS and what sets HOAS apart from nominal embeddings and de Bruijn levels: the use of function spaces for modeling binding.  You have to scroll three quarters of the article length until you come to some hint as to why HOAS includes "higher-order" in the name. DPMulligan (talk) 10:12, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Use in logical frameworks
Talk:Voyage to Faremido

message: I moved all of the bibliographic records to the References section per We (novel) and commented out the footnotes section. If there is any information about how the title has been translated or what the title means, it can go in a footnote, again per We (novel). --Jtir 16:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info on translation and meaning of the title? 

message: ISTM, that the section "Relatedness of Voyage to Faremido and Capillaria" could be removed, because there is essentially no relation. The first sentence could be moved to the beginning of the article and the second sentence could be moved to Capillaria. --Jtir 16:05, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  the section "Relatedness of Voyage to Faremido and Capillaria"
Template talk:PD-USGov-Congress

message: The template states:
:...or because it has been released into the public domain and posted on the official websites of a member of Congress.
Has anyone actually verified this is true? What if a Congressperson obtains permission to place a copyrighted image on his web site from the copyright holder. The mere act of placing it on the web page doesn't turn the image into a public domain one, does it? That doesn't strike me as correct. howcheng  {chat} 16:45, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Recovering from Wikipediholism

message: I am not able to recover from Wikipediholism no matter how I try. Why is this so? •Sean•gorter•(T) (P) 16:46, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's probably a lot like office workers unable to stop working, or hardcore video game addicts. :) — Stevey7788 (talk) 03:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  That's because Wikipedia is a video game – Qxz 05:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No 

message: Regarding my recent edit. Yworo reverted my edit with zero explanation. Dear all: Do you like the edit I made, or dislike it? If you dislike it, which part do you dislike? Kind regards, —Unforgettableid (talk) 05:33, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This does not have to do with the topic. Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 11:34, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unexplained revert by Yworo
Talk:Pronoia (disambiguation)

message: There is one other meaning of pronoia,
sociologist Fred Goldner claims its meaning as 
the inability to recognize criticism - i.e.
inability to detect when people really are saying bad 
things about you.
see: http://sociology.berkeley.edu/alumni/viewbio_querylist.php?ID=110 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.86.240.204 (talk • contribs) 16:47, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Financial transaction

message: Hi everybody out there please help me tackle this issue here. I have been struggling to determine the difference between a financial transaction and an accounting system. Can anybody out there please brief me a bit about this two systems please your help will be truly appreciated.
:A financial transaction is an exchange operation that involves finances (or money) (for example, a purchase, a sell, etc.). An accounting system is the method an enterprise or an individual uses to register the financial transactions. I hope you find this useful.--ase 20:31, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the Difference between an Accounting System and a Financial Transaction?

message: The first sentence under the heading "History" contains a major falsehood.  It reads, "In ancient times, non-financial transactions were commonly conducted through a system of barter, in which goods and services were exchanged directly, without a financial medium."
This statement is false.  The is no evidence whatsoever of any society using barter as a primary means of exchange, either intra-group or inter-group.
Vilhelmo (talk) 12:49, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barter Myth