Talk:Eulalia Pérez de Guillén Mariné

message: --Aboudaqn (talk) 20:40, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation

message: :#Length.  I have revised entry with Introduction and rewritten the Biography
:#Genealogy.  I have reformatted.  As you can see, Eulalia Perez is a "Californio" matron with great-great-great-great-great-grandchildren alive and well today.  Many of them married into other prominent families, e.g., Pico, Sepulveda, Kevane (a lawyer who served a California governor).  So, I plan to create stubs and have family members contribute to the geneaology.
:#Review.  If you could then please review this article again, I would be grateful.
Aboudaqn 04:39, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll get some more people to take a look at it.--Commander Keane 04:52, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New review

message: Her death certificate, located in the Los Angeles County courthouse in Santa Ana records that she lived to be 140 (dying in 1768)
I thought she was born in 1768. I think that last date is wrong. BigBlueFish 08:57, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death certificate 

message: I have added an important Facebook link -- for Eulalia's descendants.  The Facebook page asks for contributions from descendants, which I will add to this Wikipedia article over time (probably under "Stories from Descendants" or some such section.
Aboudaqn  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.255.22.200 (talk) 18:13, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Important new Facebook link

message: The section on Rancho del Rincón de San Pascual doesn't ring true - although it may be what Eulalia believed - and certainly is what some recent newspapers report.  But the story doesn't match the detailed Chain of Title documented in Chapter 7 of Robinsons "Land in California".  In addition, the Missions were not giving land grants to anyone in 1826.  Also it does seem reasonable that they would give 14,000 acres to a 60 year old widow - no matter how deserving.Emargie (talk) 20:37, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a fascinating discussion.  I see no reason for the claim from Eulalia's descendants to be untrue -- they gain nothing from it.  Instead, it raises the question of who wrote the records (quis custodiet custodes) and the very nature of historiography in California, as everywhere else.   Aboudaqn (talk) 12:13, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rancho del Rincón de San Pascual

message: How does one add actual details and/or notes in footnoted references on Wikipedia?  I have hunted through the Tutorial section but can find nothing.  I have tried to add sections like " | details =" with variations like "notes" and "contribution" but nothing appears afterwards in the reference/footnote that is visible in the normal article (outside of "Edit" mode).  (See references 2 and 3 in current version of article - 2009.12.30)  Aboudaqn (talk) 12:17, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding Actual Notes in Footnoted References

message: It's unfair to assume that this person was "112" with no birthdate. She could have been 111.Ryoung122 06:49, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "Unfair"? Aboudaqn (talk) 00:44, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth missing