Template talk:Infobox medical intervention

message: Unfortunately the standard procedure codes used in the UK, OPCS codes are marked copyright by the NHS Connecting for Health (Crown Copyright 2006) which does not have a policy of making its publications public domain, so I would be hesitant to add OPCS-4.3 (the current revision) codes. Claus Diff 10:16, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure it's notable enough to be included, but OPCS-4 is now available under an Open Government Licence. Little pob (talk) 11:10, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: OPCS

message: If you look at the disease infoboxes they automatically link out to the appropriate place in the ICD9/10 database. Tried to use the same could in this template but it does not appear to work. Not sure how to fix this... Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:59, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind figured it out. I needed to add the  Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:01, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Linking ICD9/10

message: This does not appear to be in English. We should either find an English version or remove it IMO. --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:37, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The "en.wikipedia.org" site is a site *in* english, not a site *about* english. There is a long-standing tradition of the documentation of international classification in the English wikipedia. Although it isn't in english, I strongly recommend that we keep it. Our options for intervention codes are limited. This is the only one I've found that is (1) up-to-date, (2) freely available on the internet in a linkable form, and (3) actually currently used in a modern medical system. It is difficult enough to triangulate the clearest possible relationships using the coding we have available, and removing OPS-301 would make it even harder.  --Arcadian (talk) 00:21, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: OPS-301 code

message: Why is this even used? Intervention is not appropriate for all uses of this infobox. How about either making it an option or a parameter, if not just remove it all together? Apteva (talk) 04:09, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It is now an entirely optional parameter. Kaldari (talk) 03:09, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subheader 

message: Baring in mind this is the medical intervention infobox, and not the medical condition infobox, the WHO linked ICD-10 template that the example infobox currently calls upon does not contain ICD-10-PCS data. On coming accross the ICD10data.com linked ICD10PCS template, I tried to boldly change the template called on in the data1 field, but it effectively deleted the line instead (so self reverted). Could some one look at switching the templates if there is consensus? Little pob (talk) 12:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ICD-10-PCS codes 

message: We have a newer version with human readable information. Switch from the old to the new will need to be gradual much like with  Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:37, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: {{tl|Infobox medical intervention (new)}}

message: People have other ideas of what could be useful in such an infobox? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:13, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hum yes "medical procedure" could be good aswell. Do you want to format this as a move request User:EncycloABC? Lets see if others have thoughts. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:33, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I need to wrap my head around the old and new template and how it relates to classification. My side goal is to improve medical procedures coverage and have it linked to resources (e.g., MeSH, ICD10PCS, SNOMED CT). The new template seems to leave this to Medical resources which is good. The only remaining thing is to have it pre-populated from WD (on pages where no current resources is manuall (via WP) entered) EncycloABC (talk) 19:30, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  reference range. (and have clear relationship to diagnostic infobox) EncycloABC (talk) 19:36, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Other ideas

message: I have medium WP expertise. As a side project, I would like to get a list of all articles that use a given template. In this case Infobox medical intervention and Infobox medical intervention (new). Can someone point me how I can do that? It could be a SPARQL query or API solution. Mousing and point and click is less preferred. EncycloABC (talk) 19:31, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: See here. There's a "What links here" link in the left sidebar that shows all pages linking to a page; those marked as "(transclusion)" are the ones making use of the template and not merely linking to it. In this particular case, that's little enough to make API or the like unnecessary. If you want to go the API route, WP:VPT may be the place to ask. Huon (talk) 20:50, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query for all pages that are using this new template 

message: On this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_corpuscular_volume , I hope to show LOINC code and reference ranges from wikidata here https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1358504  
Infobox diagnosic seems to have it but I think diagnostic is type of 'medical intervention (new)'EncycloABC (talk) 19:26, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Template:Infobox diagnostic does not draw content from Wikidata. I'd be very careful about that functionality since taking Wikidata content in that way is controversial on Wikipedia. That said, to me it seems more useful, if such functionality is desired (and there's a consensus for having it), to add it to the diagnostic template and to give this one the ability to incorporate the latter as a sub-template. As an aside, I don't see why mean corpuscular volume should have a "medical intervention" template since it's not an intervention. Huon (talk) 21:45, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  how to use it 

message: I would like to update this new version of infobox (with suffix new) to also have (like the old version) display of linked IDs
e.g., this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_vitro_fertilisation shows linked icd10pcs code and mesh code but when migrated to the new, it looses it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by EncycloABC (talk • contribs) 19:25, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: correction to my post above. I guess it is now part of medical resources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by EncycloABC (talk • contribs) 19:32, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  so was able to achieve that on the page mentioned above. I almost feel like deleting the whole talk section now. EncycloABC (talk) 19:34, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  import of linked IDs 

message: Why the specialty is not picked up correctly from WD here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasectomy_reversal EncycloABC (talk) 16:46, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  specialty 

message: Hello folks, following the TFD these two templates have been merged. What parameter(s) should be removed from the "old" version of the template? Once that information is determined I can go through with my bot and clean out any existing uses of them to avoid future confusion, plus do a bit of standardising on some of the parameters with multiple variants.  Primefac (talk) 10:32, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ideally the bot would add  (placed per template documentation) and then move any listed external links and classification data to that. However, before that, some of the parameters will need adding to the med res template; the changes needed were sandboxed during the TfD. No reason to suspect they won't work but, for the sake of full disclosure, I haven't had chance to do any testcases. Little pob (talk) 11:07, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-merge discussion