lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:GWR 4073 Class 4079 Pendennis Castle

message: I thought individual engines got their own pages. William M. Connolley 22:24, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes and no.  If you don't provide any information on the engine (build date, withdrawal date), etc. (see http://www.greatwestern.org.uk/m_in_cas_castle4.htm and http://www.railuk.info/steam/getsteam.php?row_id=1572 ) or the fact that this engine was until quite recently Down Under or provide a decent photograph then it's best just to try to concentrate on writing the article on the class (which is also a stub.  We don't yet even have a list of their names).  The basic research is not hard, however until it's done, the reader is best served by looking at the class page.
Ah... the only other one that I can immeadiately find is GWR 4073 Class 5051 Earl Bathurst which... um... I created. OTOH DH edited it... William M. Connolley 22:33, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

text: There are others around, e.g. LMS Princess Coronation Class 6229 Duchess of Hamilton, BR standard class 9F 92220 Evening Star.  It's possible, but do your research. Dunc|☺ 22:38, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  This would be an argument against creating any stubs. Please be a little less... abrupt. William M. Connolley 08:52, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  The guidelines specifically say "a good stub".  This is not "a good stub".  I'd be embarassed by it and even more so by the photo.  Another one that falls into the "to get a job done properly you've got to do it yourself" box then I guess?  I love this place. Dunc|☺ 09:09, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, it's your cruft you fix it. Dunc|☺ 15:55, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

text:  If you love this place, then why not try to make it a nice place, instead of being gratuitously rude? William M. Connolley 15:13, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding article creation...
Talk:Geoff Dyer

message: My first full large article. Is this small enough to qualify as a stub? Someone needs to flesh out his biography... The "He lives in London, where he.." line comes from his book jackets, I wasnt sure if it was appropriate. --Quiddity 22:25, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the second half of the sentence. — Mark (Mkmcconn) ** 22:52, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: These had been in the article as External links, but could possibly serve as references:
*Biography
*Interview with Geoff Dyer at Identity theory
*Interview with Geoff Dyer at Absolutewrite.
*Audio interview with Geoff Dyer at On Point
*Geoff Dyer at the complete review
*Analysis of But Beautiful with excerpts
*Audio interview on Bookworm, National Public Radio
*Video: Geoff Dyer at Adelaide Writers' Week. With J.M. Coetzee March 2010, SlowTV
Novaseminary (talk) 04:29, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential sources

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates and tables for short stories, poems and/or book reviews. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. Feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 07:36, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 
Talk:History of Frankfurt am Main

message: This article suffers a little from having been translated (partially? in full?) from the German Wikipedia article. I don't have time to tidy up the text, unfortunately ... just to point out the problem :-) UrsusMaximus 10:51, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that's my fault.  It was translated in full from the German, but I never got around to doing a final revision for English style so it's very klunky.  — Laura Scudder ☎ 17:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language quality 

message: Hi. I was interested in this, under "Post-war period": "in the IG Farben Building, intentionally left undamaged by the Allies' wartime bombardment." I had previously had the impression that wartime bombing was in general quite imprecise, and I was surprised to read that this building survived, in an area generally quite badly hit, by design rather than luck. There are all sorts of great stories about what did and didn't happen in the bombing, so in a way I'd love this to be true, but it would be great to have a reliable source for this, at which point I'd be much happier about it being in the article. Can you help please? Thanks, DBaK (talk) 20:34, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not a conclusion but I got the idea from the article IG Farben Building which states "During World War II, the surrounding neighbourhood was devastated, but the building itself was left largely intact". If this is wrong then obviously you will want to correct it, with appropriate references. I hope with your local knowledge you might have a view on my actual question? That would be great, thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 07:13, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  IG Farben building: intentionally undamaged? Source? 

message: Someone put in a bizarre statement:
: Frankfurt used to be part of Germany but has in the late 19th century the French bought Frankfurt. It is still commonly thought to be in Germany even though it belongs to France.
I've taken the liberty of removing it.    140.147.236.194 (talk) 20:13, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Belongs to France??? 

message: What happened to the synagogues during the Nazi era in Frankfurt? Were they burnt down on Kristallnacht? And have they been rebuilt?? 81.132.121.98 (talk) 11:50, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Synagogues'''

message: I have added an image of Anne Frank since her parents came from Frankfurt, and her gravestone is shown in the same section. 86.155.210.225 (talk) 16:44, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed it for failing WP:NFCC. Do not re-add it. Werieth (talk) 17:26, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Anne Frank

message: What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content. Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 13:36, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Timeline of Frankfurt]]
Talk:Antonio Capuzzi

message: Its a start...
Aparently he was celebrated in his time. Hes now all but forgoten except for the concerto in f major for the double bass (i think the original was in d major, but im not sure)
:Just did a little bit of a rewrite. It was previously just a copy and paste of the intro found in the Boosey & Hawkes edition of the concerto for DB (in other words, a copyvio). -- ßottesiηi (talk) 04:19, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:1984

message: Why isn't Big Brother Jimbo? -- Miborovsky U|T|C|E| ,   
:Big Brother IS is Jimbo. --Siva1979Talk to me 19:58, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Dam this is funny.--Planetary 18:44, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it is funny. Or it was. That's why I'm putting it back to it's former version when it was much funnier. Also, the Stalin picture is very appropriate for 1984. Dude Aronomy 06:07, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is great! --–  Emperor Walter Humala  · ( shout! · sign? ) 00:03, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

message: We must delete this or the more oblivious members of the Proles (Anonymous Users) might find out and rebel.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Series premiere (remake) (talk • contribs) 05:01, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Might catch on 

message: WP:INGSOC redirects to Wikipedia:Policies and Guidelines. It was created in 2012 and no one even noticed. CamelCase (Talk | Contribs) 07:58, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fun fact
Talk:Victor Silvester

message: I can't see why this has been tagged. He's a notable bandleader, the cited song was his signature tune... Sure it's a substub, but there's enough context and content there to allow for expansion, surely? If it wasn't 20 to midnight and I had other things to do I'd make a start on expansion myself. Tonywalton  | Talk 22:39, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Ardingly was only one of three schools he went to, according to his entry in ODNB. Trinity came later, after the war; he studied harmony there. Woblosch 23:12, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: His death 'while on holiday' down here could have been avoided as he got drowned (source: local press 'Var Matin'. Cliff.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.188.236.97 (talk) 09:31, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, maybe, but would need an exact ref. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:33, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Talk:List of English-language idioms of the 19th century

message: The Nuttall Encyclopedia, 1907 edition, defines a number of late 19th century idioms in ways that don't lend themselves to individual Wikipedia articles. The origin of this page was to provide a way to cover these concepts so that the goals of the Nuttall Encyclopedia coverage project could be met.
Note this page is about idioms, not similes, slang etc. It is built on the same principles as List of idioms in the English language. Other editors may want to extend the list back in time, or into the early 20th century, or to other parts of speech, although it would be a good idea to consider the organization of such lists carefully. David Brooks 22:44, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of this page

message: :On the redirects - using the list clearly marks the usage as archaic, while throwing it into the main article can seem gratuitous. If you do make a redirect, the target has to mention the alternate name in an obvious way, to avoid reader astonishment. In the particular case of Bacon, according to the current article "doctor" is today considered wrong anyway - see this diff - and the redirect (I see you made it) is only explicable if you can translate the Latin, admittedly not a challenging task.  David Brooks 17:15, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Bother. I forgot that redirecting to a tag doesn't work. All the redirs land at the top of this page. David Brooks 17:40, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirects

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 04:01, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-24 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: "Goody-two-shoes" is redirected to this page, but I don't see any reference to that phrase.  Perhaps I missed it, or perhaps the redirection ought to be canceled (however that's done).  Furthermore, how would one check other redirections to this page to see if they are still valid?  75.15.118.69 (talk) 01:20, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Goody-two-shoes" and redirections?
Talk:White Americans

message: The wiki text below, is outdated, and doesn't match any of the census data, nor is it a valid metric as it is a voluntary community survey used by only 80 million people. This does not match the current US Census data. Here is the current data and link: 
English 12.5% (mixed ancestry white 19.8%)
German 7.6% (19.1%)
Irish 5.3% (16.4%)
Italian 3.2% (7.1%)
Polish 1.3% (3.7)
French 0.8% (3.4%)
Scottish 0.7% (3.6%)
https://www.census.gov/library/visualizations/interactive/detailed-race-ethnicities-2020-census.html
Below is the inaccurate data:
The most commonly reported ancestries of non-Hispanic White Americans include German (13%), Irish (10%), English (9%), Italian (6%), French (4%), Polish (3%), Scottish (3%), Scotch-Irish (2%), and Dutch, Norwegian, Swedish, and Russian (each 1%), respectively. AmericanDemographics (talk) 10:27, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: * Pppery * it has begun... 22:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 April 2024 

message: the "% change" column is not showing the change in percent from one ten year data point to the next. It's showing nominal change in the white population. who can fix this? skakEL 12:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "% change" column in table in the "Demographic information" section showing a wrong calculation 

message: Add White trash to see also section. 2600:6C50:7EF0:71E0:850:28DB:D2EE:6D8E (talk) 07:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: * Pppery * it has begun... 22:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 May 2024
Talk:Harry M. Daugherty

message: The Blackstone, not the Palmer House, was the supposed meeting place for the smoke-filled room. See: http://www.encyclopedia.chicagohistory.org/pages/3217.html --Our Bold Hero 23:07, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The section The "Ohio Gang" contains a lot of material that is redundantly covered in Warren G. Harding and The Teapot Dome scandal. It would be nice if somebody could help eliminate the redundancies in Wikipedia here and also transpose some of the material about Daugherty from Warren G. Harding to this page. makeswell (talk) 20:44, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  alot of the material in the Ohio Gang section is also found elsewhere on Wikipedia 

message: Jess Smith held no formal position in the federal government. He simply served as an unofficial assistant to Daugherty. Smith lived with Daugherty at the Wardman Park Hotel in Washington, DC, and it was rumored, at the time, that the two men were engaged in a homosexual relationship. Smith was single, while Daugherty was married.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeRoyddrick (talk • contribs) 03:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculation of the relationship between Harry Daugherty and Jess Smith  
Talk:The effects of catalysts on hydrogen peroxide

message: they react immediately, it bubbles up in a big froth depending on how much or what source of catalayse you use. if you have to do an experiment to work out how much catalayse an chemical contains add approximately 20ml of hydrogen peroxide and the food source and watch the results, i had to do this in Biology and it is great just make sure you are good at jumping back quickly.
I rewrote it to be mor formal.  The title is still problematic (but at least it now spells catalyst correctly). Since I made a major change to it I decline to be the person to remove the cleanup tag. RJFJR 23:11, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: original version
Talk:Mark Keppel High School

message: Two uses of the word "harmonious" in two adjoining paragraphs. Flowery marketing prose, inappropriate for an encyclopedia entry.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.106.227.211 (talk) 23:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone 

message: Some of these people aren't really even famous.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.54.249.157 (talk) 09:15, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: He does not have a Wikiarticle, and does not seem to be notable. See WP:MILPEOPLE. Meters (talk) 01:59, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Alumni 

message: Assiduously working on flowery language and la-de-da stuff. ;-)
Resource:http://www.aacompcenter.org/cs/wested/view/sdp/19
 — DocOfSoc • Talk •   09:51, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: Additional Notable alumni:
Frederick J Ryan, Class of 1973.  Former Chief of Staff for Ronald Regan and current Chairman of the Board of Trustees for the Ronald Regan Foundation.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Ryan
He was also Vice President of the senior class of 1973.  No internet link for that, but I have a copy of the 1973 yearbook and can send you a scan of relevant pages.
echeeseman2@gmail.com
63.230.21.6 (talk) 00:11, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes please, a source (eg a scan of the page) for that would be great. Stickee (talk) 01:24, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 October 2014 
Talk:Clayton High School (North Carolina)

message: Very good start ... see other pages for ideas ... photo? more refs? Victuallers 17:08, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: New gym supports 4 classrooms. Just to clarify.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrathful God (talk • contribs) 01:07, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit new gym 

message: Suggested: Clayton High School (NC)--Jnelson09 19:28, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change title 

message: I reverted this edit since the same IP did this 2 days later, but since it is a public IP the first is probably correct, but I still rather revert it until someone can verify it. --Stefan talk 14:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I can verify that he left the school at the end of last year, and that Mr. Eaves *brutally* took over, but I don't know whether or not he was there for that many years, he left when I was just a sophmore...24.162.226.125 (talk) 23:04, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism or not 

message: The Auditorium was renovated in (I think) 2007, presumably after the curtains got set on fire. All the curtains, including the grand drape and the mid-curtains had huge holes in them, and were thus replaced, and the chairs, which had previously been made of wood and had desks attached, were replaced with cushioned seats. I have no idea if other changes were made, or if what I have said is completely accurate, but I think it would be a worthwhile thing to note, since this article seams to focus largely on  the construction of the current school.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CatDemonNinja (talk • contribs) 02:51, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auditorium renovation
Talk:Death of Elizabeth Shin

message: The article starts by stating that Shin's death is now believed to have been accidental, but refers to it as a suicide throughout. Furthermore, it only provides support for the notion that it was a suicide, and offers no reasons why it should be considered an accident. This makes no sense. Miai 23:22, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: With due respect, I believe that your additions don't belong in this article.  The cultural issues you bring up are real, but to associate them with a particular individual without strong evidence is inappropriate.  
As an example:  It's a true statement that sickle-cell anemia is more prevalent among black Americans than white Americans.  But it's a misapplication to state that Michael Jordan is at higher risk for sickle-cell anemia than the population in general.  Unless you have specific information about Jordan's health, it's racist to make that claim about him just because he is black.  
You have not shown that Elizabeth Shin's family life exposed her to the issues you raise; you're simply saying that the issues apply because she is Asian.  
--Heath 68.191.7.126 05:51, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply

message: I actually, to a small extent, knew Liz Shin. She was from my town and graduated in the same class as my sister (whom was five grades ahead of me, which is why I say that I only kind of knew Liz). It is obvious from her college experiences that she was both very sick and very lonely; my sister told me after her untimely passing that she didn't think Liz had many friends in high school. With that said, Liz was also an absolutely exceptional student, and incredibly intelligent (she graduated as her class's salutitorian). Even though it was many years ago, it was still a horrible tragedy that happened, and I can only hope mental counseling- at MIT and in general- have been slightly improved because of the awful events that unfolded. -- Kicking222 01:37, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Terrible tragedy

message: At the beginning of the article, it says that Elizabeth died in 1998, but then it says a dorm-mate found her burning alive in 2000.  Which is accurate and can someone please fix this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.167.201.194 (talk) 04:27, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong death date? 
Talk:Brossard, Quebec

message: There needs to be more info on the history of Brossard, Quebec. Jsmaster24 23:23, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The point format makes the section look choppy and overly long.  Can we edit some of this info into a couple of paragraphs, perhaps leaving out some of the less significant information.  I would volunteer to do this myself if no one else wants to, but I am less familiar with some of these roads (I have family in Brossard but I live in MTL). Sbacle 17:50, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, sounds like a good idea; some of those roads may not be necessary to be included. I can help out too. Jsmaster24 18:18, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Content
Category talk:Society

message: I think :Category:Society and :Category:Human societies should be merged because there is little or no difference between both concepts, as society is almost always human. Therefore, there isn't any reason to have these separated categories. I suggest to have only the category Society and merge Human societies into Society. What's your opinion? --Jaimedv 23:24, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. For the purposes of portals and navigation, that should be fine, though one should prominently note certain animals have society of a sort. dml 14:20, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Society vs. Human Societies 

message: You merged the categories without merging the text from :Category:Human societies.  Frankly this category text looks far worse than human societies did in terms of formatting. Does someone want to go and reformat the portal part of the category page or undelete the other category to get the text? dml 00:46, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portal 

message: Why did you make this category part of the Top 10 category but with an inicial space:
  Society
It doesn't look so good to me, mainly because it isn't sorted in the S block but instead, in a no initial block. jοτομικρόν | Talk 13:05, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorisation Top 10 

message: Society is the subcat and supercat for culture (and, obviously, vice versa).  Where within the (useless) higher categories should this (or culture) be situated?
Culture is the valued traditions of the people who compose a society. In the sense used here, "culture" is a subcategory of "society." --129.98.214.103 (talk) 13:14, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: circular categories

message: I think this category should not be under the Fundamental Category.  Personally, I like order to things, and something being under the Fundamental Category that isn't an "Umbrella" Category shouldn't be there.  Additionally, the Category: Social systems (closely related to Scociety) is under the System Category, which is in turn under the Structure and Nature Categories (both "Umbrella" Categories that are under the Fundamental Category).  I am bringing this up before I make any changes that would affect the Category system. Esnaz (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 01:31, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 

message: I think this category dealing with society. Category:Social has  great scope in categorisation to minimise the contents in the category.--Arjunkmohan (talk) 15:13, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  need new a category 

message: Society is a more global category than humans and structure categories so I remove humans and structure categories. It's also for prevent the loops.Zipodu (talk) 14:32, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove humans category and structure category