lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/VivioFateFan

message: User:VivioFateFan
    run at Mon Dec 31 01:45:25 2007 GMT
Category talk:         2
Category:              7
Image talk:            7
Image:                 21
Mainspace              1345
Portal:                2
Talk:                  178
Template talk:         1
Template:              15
User talk:             2807
User:                  289
Wikipedia talk:        8
Wikipedia:             1436
avg edits per page     1.48
earliest               09:54, 22 October 2007
number of unique pages 4135
total                  6118
2007/10  873
2007/11  2677
2007/12  2568
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes
edits without an edit summary)
           Mainspace
5 Jhalak Dikhhla Jaa
4 White Lady (ghost)
4 Limited appearance
4 Judaism
4 3LW
3 Hirofumi Hayashi
3 Joseph Quick (1809-1894)
3 Scientific plagiarism in India
3 Hayate Yagami
3 Sport
3 Teabagging
3 Nanoha Takamachi
3 Maya civilization
3 Ottama
3 Jiraiya (Naruto)
                     Talk:
3 Hayate Yagami
3 Cristina Scabbia
2 Serena van der Woodsen
2 Verin (Dungeons & Dragons)
2 Jeff Gaylord
2 Joe Gomez
2 Judith Jacobs
2 Queen of Air and Darkness (Dungeons & Dragons)
2 Vita (Nanoha)
2 Template (Dungeons & Dragons)
2 Hirofumi Hayashi
2 Jergal
                 Category talk:
2 WikiProject Articles for creation participants
                     Category:
3 Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Sam coles 1234
2 Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of PaidInFull1987
            Image:
5 TwinkleTestImage.PNG
2 Indianhead-mountain-trees.JPG
       Template:
6 Vandalism information
2 Wrong version
               User:
117 VivioFateFan
61  VivioFateFan/Sandbox
10  VivioFateFan/monobook.js
10  VivioFateFan/Rfa
9   VivioFateFan/at
8   VivioFateFan/Sandboxes
6   VivioFateFan/Sandboxes/Afc
6   VivioFateFan/archivelist
4   VivioFateFan/Talkheader
3   Alwin Sky
3   Franceslynn
3   VivioFateFan/UnblockofKeepscases
3   VivioFateFan/Sandboxes/Article
2   121.45.163.48
2   VivioFateFan/Antivandal
         User talk:
61 VivioFateFan
15 Franceslynn
11 VivioFateFan/archivelist
9  Pregnant2papa
8  Slysy76
8  Java2s
6  Kitty53
6  Sam T 2k7
6  Thornton32
5  Starcat2002
5  Angli Cado Primoris
5  Vinu77
5  VivioFateFan/Oct2007
4  Eddymania7
4  Lishkee
                   Wikipedia:
146 Articles for creation/2006-05-03
125 Articles for creation/2006-05-24
93  Articles for creation/2006-05-04
48  Articles for creation/2006-05-06
33  Articles for creation/2006-11-12
30  Pages needing translation into English
28  Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
27  Articles for creation/2006-11-13
26  Articles for creation/2006-11-19
26  Administrator intervention against vandalism
23  Articles for creation/List-2006-11
23  Sandbox
22  Articles for creation/2006-05-01
22  Articles for creation/2007-12-12
21  Help desk
Wikipedia talk:
2 Notability
If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at User talk:Interiot
.
Based directly on these URLs: [1], [2]
* The edit count was retrieved from this link at 01:45, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for VivioFateFan
Talk:List of parliamentary constituencies in Lincolnshire

message: As lists go this is complete.  There seems nothing more that could be added to it, so it is far more than a stub.  But to be better than a C then the various facts in it would need citations, for example the members names.  The only reference given is a some future plan by the boundaries commission, which doubtless contains the present outlines but probably not the representation.  Properly referenced this could be a Good List, for all that might be worth.
I have changed the importance from HIGH to Low.  Looking at other county projects which include such lists (e.g. Derbyshire, London) they are all Low, and I don't see why a list like this should be anything else.--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 13:34, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessed

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. There is crystal-clear consensus that "parliamentary" should be lowercase in these sorts of titles. A few other points were raised during the course of the discussion (for instance, Keith D's comment regarding "list of" and Ham II's concern regarding List of Parliamentary constituencies in Wales); feel free to start separate RMs about these issues at any time. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:54, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment Naturally, a long list like this means that there could be mistakes or omissions. Please feel free to recommend any technical corrections or any pages I may have missed. Woko Sapien (talk) 20:31, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 March 2022
Talk:List of parliamentary constituencies in Staffordshire

message: I have found the changes in constituencies in Staffordshire bewildering, and have tried to make some sense of them by listing the historic ones by period.  I hope this is not contrary to project guidelines.  I suspect there ought to be a table for each period, but will await comments before attempting such.  Peterkingiron (talk) 23:57, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical 
Talk:List of parliamentary constituencies in Suffolk

message: It says there were 7 Borough constituencies in Suffolk prior to 1832, but there are seven listed. I've changed it to 7 and if anyone can explain why it says 5, please explain.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by YttriumShrew (talk • contribs) 04:49, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constituency counting 
Talk:Insyde Software

message: Watching this video of the Windows XP port to the OLPC XO laptop, it would appear that InSyde is providing a new bios for Windows on the XO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PESikUPIYVs  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joncamfield (talk • contribs) 14:37, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled section
Talk:List of naval guns

message: I believe that this one doesn't fit at all in what's usually accepted as a "naval gun", a large calibre gun used primarily against naval objectives (although can be also used against other objectives). The "Oerlikon" is a small calibre autocannon, which main use was anti-aircraft. Moreover, if it is compared with the other guns listed here, it's clear that is in a different category.  Hence, unless threr are very good reasons for not doing so, I will remove its entry from this list.  Kind regards, DPdH (talk) 01:27, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: if you consider the Bofors 40mm to be a naval gun then the Oerlikon 20mm is one too. Loosmark (talk) 11:47, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Oerlikon 20mm a "naval" gun? 

message: Again, I don't believe that this small calibre autocannon can fit in the definition of naval artillery, moreover as the main objective (as stated in the corresponding wikiarticle) was anti-aircraft defense of naval nits. So under the same rationale as for the "Oerlikon 20mm", I'll remove this gun from this list (but will ensure it is listed under "autocannons" and "anti-aircraft guns"). 
Regards, DPdH (talk) 02:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the US 1.1"/75 (28mm) gun a "naval gun"? 

message: Hi all, concluding my quick review of this list, I'm convinced that the Bofors 40mm can be considered a naval gun, as defined in naval artillery. Rationale:
* specific naval versions were developed (see details of WW2 British ones in Bofors 40 mm gun#Naval versions and US ones in Bofors 40 mm gun#Naval);
* it was/is used as the main gun armamant for most small naval units (as for example, the australian Fremantle class patrol boat and the canadian Kingston class coastal defence vessel); 
* the modern version Fast Forty was developed by Breda/Oto Melara specifically for use in naval units;
* it can/could be used against naval, air and land targets, with different types of ammunition.
As such, I'm happy to leave this entry in the list.  
Regards, DPdH (talk) 04:35, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Bofors 40mm IS a "naval gun".
Talk:Liverpool Exchange (UK Parliament constituency)

message: User:Frinton100 and myself have been going back and forth on the issue of me linking Sir John Reynolds, 2nd Baronet and Frinton100 de-linking. I have explained to Frinton100 that WP:REDYES permits notabilities to be linked in accordance with WP:BIO. Baronets automatically qualify as notable. Graemp (talk) 12:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a case of "permits" or not, REDNOT suggests that red links for people are not a good idea. Some of those candidates have had red links for 2 and a half years, so they can't be particularly high up anyone's list of priority subjects for new articles. Frinton100 (talk) 12:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: We shouldn't be too fixated by policies, it's what works for the article, and I don't see how having red links for candidates is helpful when clearly no action has been taken for years to create articles to fill the gaps. If you do want a policy, try REDNOT which states "A redlink to a person's name should be avoided" Frinton100 (talk) 13:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Red link
Talk:Liverpool Garston (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I wonder if the section that states "The Labour Party held Liverpool Garston from the 1983 general election until the constituency was abolished. Prior to that time the constituency was a fairly safe Conservative seat until Labour gained it in 1974, with the Conservatives regaining it in 1979 for the last time.", requires a bit of clarification. As noted in the results section the 1983 Labour win was classed as a hold due to the fact that the constituency had undergone substantial boundary changes which meant Labour would have won it in 1979 had the constituency been fought under the post 83 boundaries Indeed The Times Guide to the House of Commons for 1983 on  p280  suggests a Labour Majority of over 5000 on in 1979 would have been the result. Also the sitting MP Malcolm Thornton moved to fight Crosby which was considered a better bet for the Conservatives, despite having been lost by the party in a by-election. The seat article also notes the wards in the constituency altered in 1983 dew to the new boundaries. It is worth noting for instance Aigburth, which moved to Mossley Hill, had always been in the Garston seat prior to this. There is no doubt that the Conservative share in the vote collapsed in Liverpool in the 1970s, but I think it could be clearer in this statement that it was boundary changes which moved it from being a marginal to a Labour inclined seat. Dunarc (talk) 22:46, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section
Talk:Liverpool Walton (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Either the 1997 or 2001 election results are incorrect. They are identical. Please correct  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulreed (talk • contribs) 17:24, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Liverpool Wavertree (UK Parliament constituency)

message: The 1990 election results section has a "notional" result for the 1992 election. What exactly is this?There's no explanation anywhere, and the constituency didn't exist in 1992. Is there any reason not to delete this result? Swanny18 (talk) 13:21, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There's been no explanation of this, and anyway the result stated isn't supported by the source given, so I've gone ahead and deleted it. I trust everyone is OK with that. Swanny18 (talk) 20:01, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious notional result 

message: Why is the Lancashire Map the pre-1974 Map?--Kitchen Knife (talk) 16:38, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: MAP
Talk:Lostwithiel (UK Parliament constituency)

message: 1593, where it says John Beal, may be Robert Beale (diplomat). Charles Matthews (talk) 06:53, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lowestoft (UK Parliament constituency)

message: My election box has gone wrong for the 1959 general election does anyone know how to sort it out? It would be great if someone could.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lifeontheedge (talk • contribs) 23:22, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  HELP! 

message: I propose merging Waveney (UK Parliament constituency) into Lowestoft (UK Parliament constituency). Boundary changes between the two constituency names are only marginal, both in 1983 and now, and it would be easier to follow and write about, e.g. past election history and trends, if the information was all in one article. Similarly to the way there aren't two separate articles on Anglesey (UK Parliament constituency) and Ynys Môn (UK Parliament constituency). Chessrat (talk, contributions)  12:47, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree. Ynys Mon happens to be the Welsh name for Anglesey, and the boundaries will be completely unchanged. Neither is the case here. I would even hold that for, for example, 'Keighley and Ilkley' which will be the Keighley constituency, no boundary changes and just a new name. The articles should not be merged. FieldOfWheat (talk) 21:00, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

text: Disagree. This a tricky one and there are other examples where articles have been merged e.g. Blyth/Blyth Valley and Dover/Dover and Deal. There are 4 other instances of names being changed without boundary changes in the 2023 review, with quite a few others with similar names and modest boundary changes, e.g. Sherwood/Sherwood Forest and, in Suffolk, Bury St Edmunds/Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket. If we are going to merge Waveney and Lowestoft, then all these other examples would have to be covered by one article and where do we draw the line? JSboundaryman (talk) 20:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Ludgershall (UK Parliament constituency)

message: The History of Parliament has Robert Mason (Master of Requests) a party to the double return. Charles Matthews (talk) 14:19, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 1626 election
Talk:Maldon (UK Parliament constituency)

message: The link associated with the name "John Strutt" incorrectly redirects to the 3rd Baron Rayleigh, the famous physicist.  Lord Rayleigh was (I believe) the grandson of the John Strutt named here. DMTate (talk) 01:14, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad Link
Talk:Malmesbury (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I have amended the redlink of "William Crofts (Malmesbury)|Sir William Crofts" to "William Croft (MP)|Sir William Croft".  This follows the discovery of article on the Sir William Croft (so far unarticled in Wikipedia) in the History of Parliament (volume for 1604-1629).  He was previously MP for Launceston in 1614, and was ultimately killed in action with Royalist forces in the English Civil War in 1645.  He belonged to the Croft family of Croft Castle, Herefordshire.Cloptonson (talk) 21:21, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Amendment to MPs redlink
Talk:Dadivank

message: Here are the pics of Dadivank, i don't know how to put a them here without uploading files to English Chapter: 
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%98%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5:Dadivank_Monastery.jpg
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%98%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5:Dadivank.jpg
--D'Arahchjan (talk) 19:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you upload them to commons, all the projects could use them. Otherwise I don't think its possible to link it ru.wiki. VartanM (talk) 01:56, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Azerbaijan is not executing judicial authority over Karvachar, therefore the term "de jure" does not apply in this case. And it is a disputed territory. Per Wiki's policy of neutrality (NPOV), we should make no judgment as to the present or future status or NKR and territories it controls. Present language just states the facts, with no bias.  Also, no source of this biased info was included. Aptak (talk) 00:46, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

message: "The works of restoration was sponsored by Armenian-American businessman Edil Hovnanian"
In the sentence above Edele Hovnanian's name is misspelled. Also, it is her not him, so she can't be a businessman. Here is the proposed version of the sentence.
"The works of restoration was sponsored by Armenian-American businesswoman Edele Hovnanian."
Reference: http://birthrightarmenia.org/pages.php?al=board_directors&re=our_people
--G0h4r (talk) 08:44, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: . JohnCD (talk) 21:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edele Hovnanian not Edil Hovnanian 

message: Habilium (talk) 10:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have sources? --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 11:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

text: - Unsourced. — CuriousGolden  (T·C)  11:05, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 February 2021 

message: Change typo "Davidank" to "Dadivank" (vid->div).
In this exact line:
In August 2017, Italian specialists who had previously conducted restoration operations at Davidank returned to continue their cleaning and restoration of the monastery. 51.52.172.98 (talk) 05:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Jamedeus (talk) 06:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 April 2024
Talk:Mid Dorset and North Poole (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Turnout figure for 2015 is wrong I think - BBC has it at 67.5%.
Link - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/politics/constituencies/E14000815
Neil W (talk) 18:14, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Mid Sussex (UK Parliament constituency)

message: The redirect Mid Sussex(UK Parliament constituency) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 06:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Mid Sussex(UK Parliament constituency)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Middlesex (UK Parliament constituency)

message: The Times for this period states that it is George Boulton Mainwaring and not William Mainwaring as per This book. Lucian Sunday. My Mistake, father and son. (talk) 11:27, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mr Mainwairing
Talk:CCC

message: CCC is a computer thing that is for schools to like help kids a little bit cuz some kids do have alot of help on the ccc.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.72.139.163 (talk) 02:15, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Clean Clothes Campaign is missing. I am unsure, however, in which section to list it. Richbook (talk) 09:40, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean Clothes Campaign
Talk:Milton Keynes South (UK Parliament constituency)

message: There seem to be no references for this article - presumably the original author will have this on their watchlist - could you please provide some references?ColourSarge (talk) 18:11, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: (Copied from article space, where it should not be visible.  It is left there, but as a hidden comment):
:The candidate order prior to election declaration is specified at: Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Parliament constituencies - Style - Election candidates. This  follows the legal specification issued by the Electoral Commission.Electoral Commission Guidance manual for (Acting) Returning Officers at a UK general election Section B Page 36, December 2009
 --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 18:33, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of listing candidates 

message: Somebody who knows the detail and where to find it might add some text about the size of the electorate. If I remember correctly, the electorate of the MK constituencies is disproportionately large. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 15:49, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electorate 
Talk:Monmouth Boroughs (UK Parliament constituency)

message: In spite of the reference to him in the cited newspaper (Cork Advertiser, 8 April 1852) as being a Whig, William Schaw Lindsay stood as a Liberal in the April 1952 election. This is clear from a later paragraph of the Cork Advertiser article and from a letter from Lindsay on page 8 of The Times of 5 April 1852. Lindsay had scant respect for the Whigs and was closer to being a Cobdenite Radical. He later became the Liberal member first for Tyneside and North Shields and then Sunderland.
Unfortunately I've forgotten how to use Wikipedia so my attempt to correct the error failed. 
Robert Cutts Bristol Filer (talk) 06:28, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: William Fortescue (died 1629) is listed as an MP for MB here, but this isn't backed up by his article on History of Parliament () and there don't seem to be any other William Fortescues listed for that period. Boleyn (talk) 15:41, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: History of parliament lists two William Fortescues as does wikipedia however, someone has inserted a re-direct and merged the biographies. Check William Fortescue disambiguation. Graemp (talk) 18:34, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Query
Talk:Morecambe and Lunesdale (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I added the names of the candidates as published in the official list of nominations, sourced. This was reverted, with edit summary "This reflects the consensus in the extended discussion at UKpolitics and also note wp:blpprivacy". 
Without getting into an edit war, I don't understand why we should not use the full form of the names published by the council elections office, and can't see that there is a privacy issue given that the full names will be on ballot papers seen by thousands of voters. If we shorten the names, we need sources for each chosen short form, as not everyone uses their first given name. Unsourced short forms are WP:OR. 
Could someone point me to the previous discussions, to help me understand this? Thanks. PamD 13:35, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It's convention in English language writing to only use middle names either in the article about the person themselves (as part of the lede, to fully identify the person), or when disambiguation is needed from other people with the same personal and family names. This is common English usage, not a wikipedia-specific guideline. Rhialto (talk) 09:56, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names of candidates
Talk:Morley and Outwood (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I would like to speak to iur local MP as i av been on the waiting list of are local council now for nearly a year on Band A which is top priority and i av bid nearly every week for a property of my own but yet i am still waiting. I'm living in a one bed flat supported housing and ive had to have my flat fumagated once but still i sit ere and itch. Ive asked them to take this carpet out as it was left in from the last tennant and it stinks and its filthy but they still av not removed it. I suffer with mental health and its not doing my illness any good. Im depressed and very unhappy living in these conditions... Its disgusting. Please help me Lindsey louise sharp (talk) 18:27, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, this is Wikipedia and not the website of your constituency. The website of the local MP is https://www.andreajenkyns.co.uk/ for the constituency which may provide some more useful information and advice and the email address is andrea.jenkyns.mp@parliament.uk. However. Wikipedia cannot provide any advice or guidance in this, or any other matter.   Velella  Velella Talk   18:35, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Living conditions