lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Harry Schaare

message: I removed one of the "external links". Wadle Galleries was a legitimate place of business from 1981 till 2013 (the owner, Al Wadle, had died in late 2012). [source: https://web.archive.org/web/20131208033510/http://www.wadlegalleries.com/]
As it sometimes happens, the gallery's url seems to have lapsed since then, and been snapped up by crooks. Clicking on a Wadle Galleries link now will reroute your browser to advertising, including vile porn sites.
Please keep that in mind, maybe you will come across other old links to the gallery on wikipedia - try to remove them.
Otto von B. (talk) 23:12, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Shanwei

message: Here's the relevant section in the NPR report I cited:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5056500 
"KUHN: A man who answered Jung Guanzhee's home phone in Dongzhou 
confirmed ... only when attacked by spear-wielding Molotov cocktail-hurling townspeople."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobby fletcher (talk • contribs) 07:22, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Zhanjiang

message: Do they still speak French in Zhanjiang?124.182.65.10 (talk) 22:59, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: <bold>Typo in Time Zone Description</bold>
In the Geography section was the time zone ID , fine, but added was the time zone differential compared to Toronto. This is extraneous information. Removed from original article pending confirmation of summer/winter time zone changes. Erroneous text was "(12 or hours earlier than toronto, Canada corresponding to summer and winter time)".
Richard416282 (talk) 19:11, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography
Talk:Zhaoqing

message: I will restructure history climate geography per standard practice.
Whoisgalt (talk) 17:22, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I mean, the one in Yangzhou's obviously the primary topic but, if there's also one in Zhaoqing, it's worth mentioning and dabbing. — LlywelynII 08:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Star Lake? Five-Pavilion Bridge?

message: Basic information to add to the opening paragraph of this article: where exactly in Guangdong province Zhaoqing is located. Northwest? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 04:18, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article
Talk:Ebenezer Prout

message: There are at least two Prout organ concertos- Augener published an E minor concerto, his op.5, in 1886  and his second, in E-flat (his opus 35) was published by Vincent Music Company of London in 1909 (). (Does the referred-to book contain a good catalog of his works, is it accurate?) As to symphonies a Worldcat search turns up a 3rd symphony in F, op. 22, published around 1885 . There is also a string quartet op. 1 , Piano quartet (called in one reference his Prize quartett) (awarded the first prize by the society of British Musicians in 1865)  (first piano quartet in C major ), Piano quintet in G op. 3 ; Organ sonata op 4 , string quartet no. 2 in B-flat , piano quartet (no. 2 in F) op. 18 from the 1860s , clarinet sonata in D op. 26 . (Also many arrangements, editions, oratorios, etc. in addition to the books for which he became famous or infamous... - will try to be more thorough but later.) Schissel | Sound the Note! 17:35, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prout's symphony in G minor (Allegro moderato e con fuoco/Larghetto espressivo in E-flat/Allegro molto in C minor/Vivace assai in G minor), "produced at the Crystal Palace since our last issue" so late 1877, (possibly his first or second symphony, given the date, since the third was written for the Birmingham Festival of 1885?) is given a detailed musical description in an article of the Musical Times of January 1, 1878 
() Schissel | Sound the Note! 14:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Further

message: Possibly the most-often-performed work of Prout's is his arrangement for full orchestra and choir of Handel's Messiah.  This arrangement is even mentioned in the Wikipedia article devoted to Messiah (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messiah_(Handel)#20th_century_and_beyond).  It seems only appropriate then that any listing of Prout's works should include the "Prout Edition" of Handel's Messiah. Xinbad (talk) 03:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Handel's Messiah
Talk:Global Forum on Agricultural Research and Innovation

message: I don't understand: I rewrited the article completely, and in a very neutral style.
And I cannot find the same words at: http://www.duras-project.net/index.php?id=4&lang=eng.
I would like to ask a question: if I write the official definition of FAO on a website and then someone writes an article in Wikipedia about FAO and uses the same definition, will the article be deleted because it uses the same text as I use on my website?
I am only trying to write a basic description of the Global Forum, exactly in the same way as there are descriptions of FAO, CGIAR etc. It is an international body and we are not trying to do PR.
Thank you,
--Gfar 17:36, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, and I have withdrawn the tag.  That said, if you're as connected with the organization as you appear to be, I suggest taking a look at Wikipedia's guidelines on conflict of interest.  Thanks, and take care. --Finngall talk 18:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Thank you. I read the guidelines on conflict of interest and maybe in part I have to be more careful. Actually, I am not an employee of GFAR, but I work for some agricultural information systems one of which is GFAR. It seems there is very little information on these networks on Wikipedia. I know only a couple well, but I was thinking of starting some articles and then let more informed people to continue. Unfortunately, the most informed people on these networks are people who have been / are invoved with them.
I will try to use a very neutral tone and only factual information.
Thank you, --Gfar 09:06, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Malagasy hippopotamus

message: Very few researchers study the extinct malagasy hippopotamus!  This is nearly every academic paper ever written about them! --JayHenry 06:43, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Shouldn't the article be split, though? It seems to be an unnatural grouping. FunkMonk (talk) 14:16, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Few researchers

message: Overall, the article is very well written and well studied. Quite impressive. I believe it overall meets the Good Article criteria, and have promoted to to GA status. There are a couple areas where it could be improved, however, which could help the article achieve featured status. First, the lead could be improved to provide a better summary of the article as a whole. Ideally, a sentence or two on each of the major topics the article will discuss should be in the lead. There also shouldn't be any references here, either (since it's a summary, the references should be included later on in the article). Please review WP:LEAD for more information on writing a good lead section for an article.
Also, looking at the external link provided at the end of the article , I noticed two bits of information that probably should be mentioned somewhere:
* That the dwarf hippo probably "came to the island [Madagascar] about 1,6 million years ago."
* "The skeleton indicates that the animal lived mainly on land, while the recent African Hippoes live mainly in rivers and lakes."
Some photos of fossils, or possibly illustrations, could also improve the article further.
But overall, these are suggestions for getting the article up to FA standards. I don't think the lack of this would prevent GA status, as the article is already very well written and well researched. Cheers! Dr. Cash 19:12, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Review

message: proposed the splitting of this article into species articles.
*Split to the species to maintain consistency with all other paleontology articles.--Kevmin § 17:19, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is not even a taxon, but a term covering a geographical area, like saying "European elephant" or something. FunkMonk (talk) 17:59, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split
Talk:Stock Exchange of Visions

message: Hello,
I added the text from the Installation of Stock Exchange of Visions. I have the permission by the copyright holder (Fabrica) to do so. My relationship with them allows me to do so, as I work for some of their projects, including Stock Exchange of visions. My name is Guillermo Rivero and I am one of the creators of such project. As the project contains video interviews with relevant people and some of the videos were already linked by wikipedia, we decided to add a page of the project to fully explain what the project is. We used the same text from our about section. We can also modify it if it causes problems.
Thank you very much. 
Stock Exchange of Visions, Guillermo Rivero.
Hi there!
I arrived here from the article on Nima Arkani-Hamed. The links need to be updated. They point to a Stock Exchange Software program. 
Mike McLoughlin 20:12, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

message: The web site at www.stockexchangeofvisions.org is no longer on line (the domain is for sale). The main point of retaining this article is surely to still have access to the interview videos, but they aren't available any more. Using web.archive.org you can go back in time and access some one-paragraph biographies of the scholars listed but it doesn't seem worth it to keep this article. It was already tagged for lack of sources. EdJohnston (talk) 14:05, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original web site no longer functions. Consider [[WP:AFD]]
Talk:Doughty Street Chambers

message: I only created this article a few minutes ago, as part of a series of links to fill in on an area which is likely to be of interest to wikipedia readers and is in the public interest. And I'm happy to add to the article if there really is a need to provide more information than that already given. Given that there already several links within wikipedia to this topic, it's a bit pointless to delete this article without deleting all those links as well. Are the speedy deletionists getting a bit over-speedy? Matt Stan 17:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally admins will wait about an hour for a no-context tag. It's usually better to create the article and work on it in a user subpage, and to then create it as an article with more context.-Wafulz 18:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This search for sources appears to indicate there is sufficient material available. Addhoc 20:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Adam Solomon

message: See WP:CITE for the correct format for citing references. Note the various information that should be included and the fact that inline citations should be placed after punctuation. Regards, LaraLoveT/C 17:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Fourth Brazilian Republic

message: The paragraph "Vargas was forced to take a temporary retirement. General Eurico Gaspar Dutra was elected by an economic crisis, congressional opposition, and impatience among his supporters. He announced an ambitious industrialization plan and pursued a policy of nationalization of the country's natural resources. To reduce foreign dependency, he founded the Petrobras Brazilian state oil enterprise" is horribly confused but I don't think I have have sufficient knowledge to put it right. I believe the "he" in the second and subsequent sentences refers to Vargas (certainly in the case of the foundation of petrobras) but the text reads as though that were Gaspar Dutra. And GD "... elected by an economic crisis ..." makes no ense at all. It looks like some text has been deleted by mistake - Does anyone know what it is meant to say? Mucky Duck 13:45, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's OK, found it. History was my friend. ;-) Mucky Duck 13:51, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  End of the Estado Novo 

message: The period in Brazilian History between the end of the Vargas Era (1945) and the Military Coup of 1964 is known as the "Republic of 46", after the Brazilian Constitution of 1946, that restablished democratic institutions in the wake of the deposition of the Estado Novo. This period is not called "Second Republic". I had moved this article to a page with the title "Brazilian Republic of 46" but the move has been recently reversed. The user that reversed it simply claims that he restored the title "Second Brazilian Republic" because "that's how its called". But no evidence has been presented to that effect. I submit that the page must be moved again.--Antonio Basto (talk) 00:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Title of the Article

message: Hello, i'm a brazilian editor, and the title "Second Republic" is wrong, the second republic is the provisional government of Getúlio Vargas, the third one being a dictatorship, this is the Fourth Republic.--Arthur Heberle (talk) 19:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Source (in portuguese). By this document, The brazilian Senate believes that the Second Republic spans from 1934 to 1937; The third republic is the Estado Novo under Vargas, which was still a republic, officially. The Fourth Republic spans the period from 1946 to 1964. Tetizeraz. Send me a ✉️ ! 03:15, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Tetizeraz, if you are still around here, do you know where I could access the webpage you mentioned? The link seems to be broken. SenseiAC (talk) 19:26, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

text: Here's the link from the web archive. I hope you find what you're looking for! User:Tetizeraz. Send me a ✉️ ! 21:51, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  : great, thank you very much! I'm going to correct the articles in French in the coming days. SenseiAC (talk) 22:16, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fourth Republic
Talk:HMS America (1757)

message: There is no such location as "Stanton, Thames", however there was a "Stanton's Yard" on the River Thames at Rotherhithe. Stuart Rankin in Shipyards, Granaries and Wharves, Maritime Rotherhithe, History Walk B states that this is where the 60 gun HMS America was built in 1757, by Thomas Stanton in partnership with a member of the Wells family.
:Changed (well, seems we did it at the same time) and cited. Martocticvs (talk) 21:46, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Stanton, Thames
Talk:EG LNG

message: GE LNG and EG LNG is the same company. Beagel 17:59, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no such thing as GE LNG.  This is incorrect spelling.  EG LNG is the correct article and the other should be removed.  Falcanary 20:24, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, "GE" stands for "Guinee Equatoriale" and is used throughout the country.  As far as "GE LNG" and "EG LNG" are concerned, they refer to the same company. --Mr Accountable 19:42, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge
Talk:Shakespeare Theatre Company

message: I would like to suggest that this article's Importance rating should be High. It is recognized as one of the top Shakespeare companies in the World. It has been invited to perform the The Oedipus Plays at the 2003 Athens Festival in Greece and Love's Labor's Lost at the RSC's Stratford on Avon facility (England). If this company does not rate a High importance, what company would?
Ecragg (talk) 23:07, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance Rating

message: I would like to move the page Shakespeare Theatre Company to Shakespeare Theatre Company (Washington, D.C.)
The reasons are 
1) there are many Shakespeare related theatres and Companies in the world and the Washington one should be distingquished from others
2) The new name would conform to the naming convention of the other theater pages associated with Washington DC region such as:
*Arena Stage (Washington, D.C.)
*Studio Theatre (Washington D.C.)
*
*National Theatre (Washington, D.C.)
*Lincoln Theatre (Washington, D.C.)
Comments please
ed 
Ecragg (talk) 02:56, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving Page 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:11, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Support Without some sort of disambiguation, it sounds like they should be located over here in the UK.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 12:56, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Hatnote to disambiguation page has been added
ed
Ecragg (talk) 17:02, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Listing critics' newspaper accolades seems inappropriate for an awards section. Generally, those are included in material about reception, or critics, etc. Also, the Wall Street Journal quote should be sourced to it, with the year indicated for the quote, or not used if you can't identify when it occurred.Parkwells (talk) 17:17, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Received Awards
Talk:Agriculture in Brazil

message: Added translation(s) by Duolingo from the Portuguese article:https://www.duolingo.com/translation/d6f077dd4cfd27bc3b01174aef621c94 Veekhr (talk) 05:01, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Duolingo translation

message: Hdhdidndkdkdkdmdkdoododd 1.38.220.49 (talk) 09:03, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duiddnidjd 

message: In the "Family farming" section of the article there's a claim that is completely unsourced and makes no sense at all:
"During the 1990s, the Lula administration implemented a set of policies that addressed food security on federal, state and municipal levels," Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (the current, and former Brazilian president from 2003~2011) was NOT president, nor even involved with the Ministry of Agriculture in any direct way in the 1990s. He was president of the Worker's Party and a Deputy for the state of São Paulo.
The source for this section, [34], Refers to a FAPDA/EU document that in no way mentions Lula or his administration at any point. 8pregos (talk) 14:14, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced wrongful claims
Talk:Tom James (rower)

message: Why is this in the English Rowers catergory, when he's welsh? — Preceding unsigned comment added by  90.197.18.15  (talk • contribs)  18:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem appears to have been fixed with this edit. – Wdchk (talk) 20:13, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Henry, Duke of Lower Lorraine

message: Please see Talk:Henry III of France#Why the anglicized "Henry"? — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  07:11, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry versus Henri 

message: I think Lorraine is a confusing term for this period and not the one normally used by historians writing in English. Lotharingia would be better? For the time being WP is inconsistent, but I think most better articles also use Lotharingia. I'll post a few such messages on articles where I notice examples.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 07:02, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name
Talk:Transport in Brazil

message: You 2409:4042:2296:58B9:0:0:297E:48AD (talk) 15:38, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is brazil 

message: Preguntas sobre la libertadores, copa américa, sudamericana, mundial, etc. 2803:9800:98CA:73CC:8D34:21E4:924C:E5CD (talk) 22:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fútbol de Brasil.    jugadores
Talk:1926–27 Ottawa Senators season

message: The schedule in this article reads that the Senators played the Maple Leafs all season. The Toronto Maple Leafs article indicates that they were known as the Toronto St. Patricks until midway thru the season when they changed ownership and their name to the Leafs. So the schedule should read that they played the St.Pats for the first 4 meetings in 1926-27 and the Leafs in the last 2 meetings of 1926-27. Also the 1926–27 NHL season indicates the team was under contract to use the name St. Patricks for the 1926–27 season, and the league ruled that the team had to fulfill its contract. They became the Maple Leafs the following season. So should this article be changed to reflect this ? UrbanNerd (talk) 16:58, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  St.Pats / Maple Leafs
Talk:Vermilion Bird

message: According to this source: http://www.onmarkproductions.com/html/ho-oo-phoenix.shtml
``
In Japan, the term “Suzaku”  is translated as “Red Bird” or “Vermillion Chinese Phoenix.” In both Japan and China, the symbolism of the red bird seems nearly identical to or merged with that of the mythological Phoenix. At this site, I consider the Suzaku and the Phoenix to be the same magical creature, although I am not certain if this is entirely true. Scholar Derek Walters (see resources) says the Phoenix was supplanted (replaced) by the Red Bird, for the Red Bird more accurately reflected the astronomical iconography associated with the southern lunar mansions. ``
The symbolism of the Chinese Phoenix (Fèng Huáng) is strikingly similar to the symbolism of the mythological Red Bird (Chn. = Zhū Qiǎo 朱雀 or Zhū Niǎo 朱鳥), also of Chinese lore. In Japan, the Red Bird is pronounced Suzaku (same Chinese characters). I believe the Red Bird is the same creature as the Phoenix, although I may be wrong. The Red Bird is one of four legendary Chinese creatures guarding the four cosmic directions (Red Bird - S, Dragon - E, Tortoise - N, and the Tiger - W). The four appear during China’s Warring States period (476 BC - 221 BC), and were frequently painted on the walls of early Chinese and Korean tombs to ward off evil spirits. For more details on Phoenix lore in China, please click here. 159.100.84.247 (talk) 15:45, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Is Fenghuang one of the four celestial guardians?
Talk:Health in Brazil

message: Health Indicators[1] 
Life expectancy female 76 (11st) 
Life expectancy male 70 (12nd 
--Diwas (talk) 16:53, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please check if the number is correct or the suffix is correct (see [[Ordinal number (linguistics)]]) 

message: In "Individual health care services" section it says "In 1999 to 2012..." and later on, it says "In the same year, 43% of public hospital beds...".
What is the "same year" if the paragraph is talking about a period of time?
--Ppazos (talk) 14:45, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct same year or period of time. 
Talk:Diglyceride

message: I suggest merging this with diacylglycerol because diglyceride and diacylglycerol are merely different names for the same thing.
Some editing would be necessary, since this page seems to be broadly defining the subject (from a food additive entry point apparently) while the other page seems to be narrowly discussing diacylglycerols in their biochemical role. Sakkura 18:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I support the merge but it'll take a little re-working.  DAG is thought of in two different contexts (intermediate in fat metabolism vs. signaling molecule) as evidenced by the two different pages for it and it'll take a bit of work to explain both of them separately.  but i definitely agree that there should be only one page. Roadnottaken 18:45, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I was bold and merged the pages. I merged into diglyceride since there already seems to be a network of glyceride-named articles set up. Otherwise we would have to go back and change all of those into -acylglycerol articles. However, it seems there were a ton of articles linking to diacylglycerol. Guess I have some merry linkfixing to do >.< Sakkura 22:31, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good.  Seems to me that as long as you set up a redirect page from the acylglycerol page you shouldn't need to fix the links, no? Roadnottaken 20:43, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with diacylglycerol
Talk:Javier Hernández (disambiguation)

message: VIAF Gonzáez Hernández, Francisco Javier one of the authors of Diccionario de citas de filosofía : 12 conceptos fundamentales en sus textosregrds
no bias — קיין אומוויסנדיק פּרעפֿערענצן — keyn umvisndik preferentsn talk contribs 11:08, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gonzáez Hernández, Francisco Javier (author)