lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Paul Raymond (publisher)

message: Somebody has edited teh article to remove a link I put in to Xaverian College/St Francis Xavier School. The article now reads that Raymond was educated by the Catholic brothers in Glossop, which I don't think is the case. I'm fairly sure the only Sta Francis Xavier school in the area was in Rusholme, and is now Xaverian College. But I doubt I'll be able to change it back because somebody will instantly revert it. After all, we wouldn't want to let the truth get in the way of what we believe to be the case! That's the Wikipedia way!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.62.134 (talk) 17:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Xaverian College

message: There's no doubt about Raymond's notability: he was notorious throughout his lifetime, was at the very least a dollar billionaire, and on his death was immediately the subject of obituaries in all three major British broadsheet newspapers. -- The Anome (talk) 14:34, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Isn't this being a bit kind? More appropriately this should be Paul Raymond (pornographer) I would have thought?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.59.182.140 (talk) 15:42, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publisher? 

message: These threats were carried out by 'decorators posing as terrorists'. Are you sure it wasn't terrorists posing as decorators? 109.154.17.244 (talk) 06:26, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you ever worked with a decorator? They're terrorists.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.115.185.4 (talk) 17:22, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extortion attempt
Talk:KOB (TV)

message: I haven't found much about when KOB-TV sold off KOB-FM and -AM (now KKOB-FM and -AM), especially when and to whom. Now the radio stations are owned by Citadel Broadcasting Company, but I don't know much about their histories. Anybody know?
(By the way, KKOB-FM's on-air unofficial name is KOB-FM, adding another bit of confusion.)
KOB(AM) & FM were shuffled within the family owned Hubbard Broadcasting until fall 1986. Price Communications (had bought WOWO Fort Wayne from Westinghouse's Group W Broadcasting) changed the calls to KKOB (AM) & FM. In 1987 the stations were transferred to Fairfield Communications (which may have been partly owned by Price). Price merged into a new company called Fairmount Communications which had acquired a pair of stations in the Detroit area, the SF Bay area, these in ABQ, and others. This was larggely owned by large bankers, including CitiBank. That was subject to financial restructurings and corporate reorganizations through 1993, when the stations were sold to Citadel.
--Oddtoddnm 02:20, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
:I must like talking to myself. (See also Talk:KRQE.) Anyway, a search through application lists for KKOB-FM and KKOB-AM indicate that they were owned by Citadel in 1980, and don't indicate a previous owner. At the same time, KOB-TV was owned by KOB-TV, LLC. --Oddtoddnm 08:13, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
The radio stations were sold to help raise capital for Stanley Hubbard's venture into direct to viewer satellite television, United States Satellite Broadcasting -- better known as USSB. They are currently using KOB (unofficially) by arrangement with KOB-TV. --S Anker 02:52, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: TV/AM/FM Split

message: I have declared this article to be not a stub. I think it's pretty complete for a local television station. However, I'd certainly like to see more information - but I think other Albuquerque stations (KASA, KNME, KOAT, KRQE, KWBQ, KASY) need more help than KOB does. --Oddtoddnm 05:13, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unstubbed 

message: How can this be both the first station between the Mississippi RIver and the West Coast and the second in the Mountain Time Zone, all of which lies between the Mississippi and the West Coast? Wschart (talk) 04:20, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 
Talk:Brent Hawkes

message: Er... calling the banns is not rarely-used in Canada.  It's routine in some churches.  I know friends in Toronto who chose to be married in church because it saved them the cost of a marriage license.
What I don't know is how common such churches are.  Does anyone have any statistics on the matter? [anonymous poster]
My understanding is that Hawkes consulted a constitutional expert before reading the banns, due to their rarity in modern marriage practice.  Perhaps it's different in other parts of the world, but I believe banns are (were?) rarely used in Canada.  CJCurrie 12:44, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:KUPN Las Vegas

message: Do we really need a separate article for KUPN? I think all the information on this article could just go under KVWB (as much of it already does).
BTW did KUPN actually sign on as a station in 1995? Wasn't it just a call sign (and perhaps ownership) change from KRLR?
- Hinto 02:26, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Christianity among the Bouyei people

message: On July 28th this page survived a VfD. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Puyi Church Redwolf24 02:27, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added an expert request.  I'm convinced that there are dead-tree sources, but am not sufficiently knowledgable on Chinese subjects to sort out the various possible transliterations/spellings/names for the ethnic group to do the research myself.  GRBerry 14:14, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:University of New Mexico

message: there is no referencing for the seciton on "Traditions" and Greek lists count as WP_UNDUE, most of them unreferenced anyway. I propose large scale deletions in these areas. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 13:59, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll take that as: "We agree, go ahead!" -- Melchior2006 (talk) 07:30, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  delete unsourced traditions and Greek life
Talk:Adult Baby

message: Dear Mr. Brenermann, 
May I quote directly from Mr. Wales? 
"If an article is repeatedly re-created by unassociated editors after being deleted, this
may be evidence of a need for an article. Conversely, if an article is repeatedly nominated for deletion, this is not in and of
itself evidence that it should be deleted even if there are valid concerns about the quality of the article. (Cleanup may be
appropriate.) In some cases, repeated attempts to have an article deleted may even be considered disruptive. If in doubt, 
don't delete!" 
I believe that says it all.
Yours,
Dave 03:06, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

message: Is an attempt to subvert the results of Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/ABDL.  I'm replacing it. brenneman(t)(c) 04:17, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: (Use Wikipedia:Dispute resolution or WP:AN/I if you want to complain.)
*You seem to be taking this very personally , and I urge you to try and see this as neither a personal attack nor an expression of moral outrage.  Please notice the word I've emphasised in your quote.  (Which it would be good to provide a source for, but that does sound like JW.). Oh, and I did laugh at you mangling my name because I mentioned it last time... ^_^ cheeky bugger.
brenneman(t)(c) 01:11, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The removal of this redirect 

message: *Per the outcome of Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Adult Baby, redirected to infantilism.  As this article is currently planning a major re-write, no information has been merged at this time.  When the structure of the infantilism page is determined, information will be merged from history.
*Please join the discussion on Talk:Infantilism to discuss this matter.
brenneman(t)(c) 14:18, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to [[Infantilism]]
Talk:Ceiling balloon

message: The article should say that there balloons are possibly dangerous for big fishes and dolphins. Indeed they may travel long distancec and once in the water look like food. --pippo2001 03:18, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't have thought they would travel far but they may react different in warmer climes. Do you have any info on this? I would have thought that Weather balloons were a bigger problem.CambridgeBayWeather 04:33, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

text: It refers to uninflated balloons. I changed the second sentence to reflect this. CambridgeBayWeather 13:32, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think the volume of gas, stated as 201 ft^3 @ 2000 psi, is wrong.  If the cylinder were 5 ft tall, it would need to be 7 ft in diameter.  I think it's something like 1.5 ft^3 @ 2000 psi, which corresponds to 201 ft^3 @ 14.7 psi.  I don't know that much about gas cylinders so I could be wrong.
:The metric figures are correct as per the Environment Canada manual. I may have made an error in the conversion but I tried several different converters and they all give 201 ft³CambridgeBayWeather 14:53, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have changed to article to reflect the 5 cu m being at STP, but compressed at 2000psi into the storage cyl. Rich Farmbrough 19:53, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  volume @ pressure 

message: The article states "The gas used to fill the balloon is helium or hydrogen.". Given that the balloon is calibrated for a fixed ascent rate, doubling the density (from H2 to He) is surely not possible (unless there is a different calibrated ascent rate for operation with helium). Is helium really used? If so, why? FredV (talk) 19:51, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hydrogen or Helium
Talk:Quintet for Clarinet and Strings

message: Brahms has a fairly famous Clarinet Quintet.  The address of this page should probably be changed to contain "(Mozart)".
:Probably the page Clarinet Quintet (Mozart) has the right title, but the content here is better-formulated, in my opinion, which is what my merge suggestion meant (I know that's not what you were referring to, especially since you wrote that before I made the suggestion anyway... darn precognitive telepaths ;) ) Indeed, even if there were only two famous clarinet quintets, there are enough often-enough-played ones that a page Clarinet Quintet (or Quintet for Clarinet and Strings, similarly) should be about the genre, not about a specific case with a disambig/other uses line at the top- and this doesn't even have that. There are few string sextets as famous as the Brahms two- even the Strauss, Tchaikovsky souvenir and Schoenberg, sextets by other names, aren't, I think? (or maybe one of them is better known than the Brahms two, given how often the Brahms have to be introduced in concert. Hrm. A question of fact, not mere declaration... I wonder. Anyway. But the page String sextet isn't just about the Brahms works for similar reasons. As to clarinet quintets... Putting aside Carl Maria von Weber's reasonably famous quintet too!... A composer whose 100th "was" yesterday, Benjamin Frankel wrote a twice-recorded clarinet quintet, just to continue the list a bit...) Schissel-nonLop! 14:18, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguous
Talk:Emmett Chapman

message: I recognize that WP is not the place to air petty grievances and respect the fact that people are working to maintain NPOV.  However, I believe it is a bit much to compare Mr. Chapman to Thomas Jefferson if we are talking about NPOV...I mean the scope of their influence is just not comparable. Both hero-worship and outright slander are violations of NPOV as I understand it. Has anyone thought of a separate article about he Stick v. Warr issue? It's not currently mentioned in either the Warr entry or the Chapman entry as if it didn't even happen.  
As for Mr. Chapman's character he seems to be a divisive figure and seems to inspire either hatred or devotion amongst touch style guitarists, depending on their camp.  Can anyone verify Brian Kenney Fresno's comment that Emmett was dismissive of Stanley Jordan?
Lyrics:
http://www.bonghitrecords.com/bonghit/lyrics.htm
Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ofCM6g78RM  —Preceding unsigned comment added by BlauNacht (talk • contribs) 22:43, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stick v. Warr Debate 

message: Would someone please edit the caption to say what instrument Chapman is playing? 
I thought it might be a stick, but I thought those usually had more than 8 strings.
--30daysinAKK (talk) 23:42, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the main picture
Talk:Scott Hall

message: The ending of his bio implies that his death was related to alcoholism. Seems like there should be some separation there. 2603:8000:3D3D:8142:3154:8F2D:DA36:DCA (talk) 00:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ending Bio and Death 

message: Oughta change it back to the old one, looked much better than his current 2600:1700:D030:4D40:C023:FF8B:544:6E8C (talk) 21:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/ComCat

message: ComCat should dedicate himself to do more creative things here, such as writing articles instead of putting the entire encyclopedia into deletion votes. 
Antonio the 5,000th Editor Martin
*While I do agree that ComCat has done appropriate VFD's, I just think he/she needs to slow down a bit, perhaps do a bit a research, then perform the VFD. If he or she does that, perhaps we would not even be here. I am not intending this to go to full-blown RFAr, I want this RFC to help him or her in their Wiki-perience. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 06:19, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

message: It seems that, despite the urging of many (with which I concur) that ComCat should perhaps tone these somewat arbitrary VfDs down, another such burst has occurred.  It looks like they're happening roughly twice a month, beginning again one month after this discussion started.  --BenM 13:31, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another burst 

message: I found this page after going to ComCat's talk page to politely suggest that "NN, D." is not an appropriate way to justify recommending the deletion of pages that other contributors have invested their time and effort in.  ComCat's talk page indicates that many such polite suggestions have already been ignored, and not even responded to, so I decided to make my point here instead of there. Snottygobble | Talk 00:50, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: NN, D.

message: The continual nomination of schools (which are speedy no-consensus, every time), is a violation of WP:POINT. Hipocrite - «Talk» 15:06, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I cannot really endorse this, since there is a sizable number of people who think they should be deleted, nominating them can hardly be considered disruptive, making a point in a non-disruptive manner is allowed and should be allowed. The best thing to do if you want to keep schools is to vote "keep" and argue why the article should be retained. Just agree to disagree with those who want them deleted. Personally, I think the best way to get rid of school articles for those who want to do that, is to merge them with the school district/town/village/neighborhood which does not require permission at AFD. Regarding ComCat, my issue with him is his continual "NN D" nominations without any explanation of why the subject is "NN", and often made without making even a minor check with Google or something to see if the subject is notable. Sjakkalle (Check!) 15:16, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point?
Talk:Mahananda Wildlife Sanctuary

message: There seems to be a temp page to replace to copyvio at Mahananda/Temp. Coffee 04:22, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

message: This page needs to be converted to a disambig page. The name "Mahananda" is more related to a river in Bangladesh. So, we can move the page at Mahananda/Temp can be moved to "Mahananda Wildlife Reserve", while we can create a page on "Mahananda River". Thanks. --Ragib 04:36, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambig 

message: Maybe they copied from Wikipedia, but in any event, this article is an almost exact copy of that website. Here is an exerpt of their copyright policy:
Copyrights
Much of the information contained in the site is copyright protected. Such protected material may be used under the terms of "fair use" as defined in the copyright laws, which generally permits use for non-commercial educational purposes such as teaching, research, criticism, and news reporting and also for individual travel requirements. No commercial use of the information is permitted 
Source: Disclaimer
Marcia Wright (talk) 04:25, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NatureBeyond website
Talk:Stimulation

message: Is this article a bit one-sided? Water, for example, is the stimuli involved in hydrotropism. Stimulation does not only occur in animals, does it? -- Jerry Crimson Mann 04:22, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Older comments

message: Perhaps move Well Stimulation into a separate article? Seems strange having the two - psychology & petroleum - welded together.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.5.227.196 (talk) 13:56, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You are absolutely right! And stimulation technology seems to be yet another subject... Lova Falk talk 07:16, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I now removed those parts and pasted them onto the talk pages of Well stimulation and Simulation Lova Falk talk 07:38, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate article?

message: This article appears redundant, since there are already articles called Stimulus (physiology) and Stimulus (psychology), which appear to discuss physical and psychological stimulation, respectively. Should this article be converted to a disambiguation page, or should it be kept in its current state? Jarble (talk) 21:16, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Should this article be converted to a disambiguation page?

message: Hello Beemer69|, Coolabahapple, BD2412, Lepricavark, Grapefruit17 -- We spilled plenty of ink at the AfD, but for all the teeth-gnashing, the article is not improving.  Now for the hard work, actually fixing it. I started. Rhadow (talk) 13:04, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Good. Do that next time too instead of taking an obviously notable topic to AfD. Lepricavark (talk) 14:35, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Now the hard work, improving the article 

message: Recent editing has garbled the lead of this page. If you look at Stimulation (disambiguation), you will see that this page has long been understood to be about  It does not make sense for there to be an encyclopedia page about all the dictionary meanings of the word "stimulation," which is what the lead now suggests this page is about. I think this needs to be fixed. Perhaps initially by reverting to this version (with the AfD tag removed, of course). — Gpc62 (talk) 22:30, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent editing should be reverted - topic of page has been changed in the lead
Talk:Guelph Collegiate Vocational Institute

message: I've added a link to the school's website, as well as posted a pic of the front archway.The Doctor 23:31, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

message: I have assessed this article for the Schools Project.  I am currently listing this article as a Low priority for the project, but given the school's history and alumni, this article may be worthy of being a higher priority; something that cannot be done in the absence of reliable sources to source the information.  If this article is substantially improved, please request a reassessment. LonelyBeacon (talk) 03:44, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Danielle Panabaker

message: The article says September 19th, but the infobox says November 19th. 187.152.60.242 (talk) 19:28, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, thanks. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:34, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date mismatch between article and infobox
Talk:Generation X (comics)

message: "eponymous monthly series"
What does that mean exactly?Zephyrprince 04:38, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Monthly comic named after the team in question - SoM 18:20, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Eponymous

message: Is this section necessary? All of the characters have their own page and it just seems this is redundant and would need constant updating for a series that is no longer being published.CrazyLuca (talk) 13:28, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: After the series

message: We need an actual plot section describing what happened to the team while it -was- a team. A re-working of Synch's history would be perfect. Someone who actually read the comics should do it, though. Not me, I haven't read all of them. Lots42 (talk) 05:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: An actual plot section
Talk:Hamoodur Rahman

message: Is this chap dead or alive? He must be 95 not out if he is still alive... I am unable to get any info on his whereabouts. If anyone knows something on this please do add it to the article. Idleguy 04:43, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
:So far as I know, he isn't alive. I don't have details, though. --Ragib 05:55, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 
Talk:Supernetwork

message: I've merged Route summarization & Route aggregation into this article because I believe they are all the same thing, but this needs a cleanup & better examples.--DanielSiva (talk) 11:05, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: The example has this as the lowest address of the networks that are being supernetted:
Address     	First Octet	Second Octet	Third Octet	Fourth Octet
192.168.98.0	11000000   	10101000    	01100010   	00000000
And then goes on to say:
The summary route should be the lowest IP address, followed by a slash
...
The summarized route is 192.168.96.0/20.
But the lowest network address is 192.168.98.0.  The address formed by taking the common bits and 0-padding on the right is the one that was given, 192.168.96.0
So it's inconsistent and I'm not sure which is right.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.151.109.15 (talk) 23:16, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: 0-padded is correct. I've taken out the misleading "lowest IP address" terminology. - Ttwaring (talk) 21:27, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertise lowest address or 0-padded common bits?
Talk:Peep show

message: Please check "What links here", specifically at those linking through the re-direct.  --rob 06:22, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, sorry friend, the porn industry still calls them "peep shows". So we have to deal with both "nice" family 19th century peepshows and XXX 20th century peepshows.M.O. (talk) 03:39, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled discussion

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved, but there's consensus to merge Raree show back into this articlefeel free to do so at any time. (closed by non-admin page mover)  Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:35, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Peep show →  – not the primary meaning of 'peep show' currently the subject of Raree show which might more aptly be renamed 'Peep show'. Jamesmcardle(talk) 10:37, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

text: Oppose  The primary topic is the "traditional" peep show, i.e. the current article plus Raree show, which should be combined into a single topic. MrStoofer (talk) 12:09, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 November 2022
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Springfield in Massachusetts

message: As of July 2021, this article was modified to eliminate the nondescript term "Roman Catholic" in favor of the more precise distinction of "Latin Church" (the sui iuris church) and "Catholic Church" (the denomination). If you believe this edit to be in error or improper, please make the relevant reversion and open discussion on this talk page or my personal talk page. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:15, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2021 Latin Church revision
Talk:Neal A. Maxwell

message: While I'm looking at it, it seems that some of his earlier material (the essays on leadership, etc.) is not included in his bibliography.Ascentury 16:29, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Was enough content added to justify removing the stub label? Uriah923 04:58, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still a stub? 