lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Soroti

message: Content added by  has been removed from this article for copyright reasons. In spite of warning, the individual using this IP has persisted in copying content from copyrighted sources without compatible licensing to Wikipedia. Please do not restore any removed text without first ensuring that the text does not duplicate, closely paraphrase or plagiarize from a previously published source, whether the one cited or another (issues have been detected from other sources than those named). Based on the editing pattern of this person, we cannot make the assumption that the content is usable. You are welcome to use sourced facts that may have been removed to create new content in your own words or to incorporate brief quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with the non-free content policy and guideline. See Wikipedia:Copy-paste and Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/67.184.212.160. Thank you. --💵Money💵emoji💵💸 01:57, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright cleanup
Talk:Oh Uganda, Land of Beauty

message: "We lay our future in thy hand." Is the word "thy" misspelling? --Love Krittaya (talk) 10:36, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Second line of lyric problem
Talk:Jose Chameleone

message: The article says he sings in Swahili and English - I have never heard a Chameleone track in English - anyone know any? I would change it to Luganda and Swahili. RantingMrP (talk) 11:59, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You are absolutely right. I have fixed the issue now. Julius Sahara (talk) 16:17, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Languages of his songs 

message: Dr Jose Chameleon being a Ugandan(colonised by Britain) and with over 100 songs adds english lyrics to his Luganda songs and in fact has a song or a few songs in english. 41.210.145.28 (talk) 09:37, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr Jose Chameleon being a Ugandan(colonised by Britain) and with over 100 songs adds english lyrics to his Luganda songs and in fact has a song or a few songs in english. 
Talk:Ljungby

message: Certainly this is important enough to be at Ljungby, with that page moved to Ljungby (disambiguation)? And if not, it should at least be moved to Ljungby, Småland or Ljungby, Kronoberg County (I don't know which is the preferred version), as I fail to see how it is ambiguous with anything not in Sweden. -- Jao (talk) 07:43, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is also other Ljungby in Sweden. Ljungby, Falkenberg for example. --Christoffre (talk) 09:41, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: My point exactly. —JAO • T • C 10:53, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree to such a move, as it is considerably bigger than any of the contenders and the seat of a municipality. Tomas e (talk) 14:02, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree too and moved Ljungby to Ljungby (disambiguation). However, moving Ljungby, Sweden to Ljungby needs help from an admin which I have asked for now. --Skizziktalk 08:36, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Huskvarna

message: Is this an archaic Norse word or can sense be made of it in modern Swedish? I see two elements, Hus & Kvarna if I'm not mistaken. The first means house I believe. 4.255.48.12 (talk) 16:39, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name meaning? 

message: That's what I'd like to know.  This right now feels like a stub, nothing more.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jae (talk • contribs) 12:00, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the article at the Swedish Wikipedia, the spelling was changed in 1906. At that time there were some spelling reforms in the Swedish language where, among other things, "unnecessary" letters like Q and W were replaced. ⛐Boivie (talk) 12:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was the name changed?  And why? 

message: To me it sounds a bit silly to ask for a reliable source of a distance of "about 5 km", unless there is a difference between "historic centre" and nowadays perceived centre of Jönköping. Or maybe there are wiki-standards, -rules that I'm unaware of? Check a map and the historic centre is indeed about 5km away:
The historic town is spot in the middle of Jönköping. You can easily measure the straight distance on Google Maps between two distinct buildings like Kristine church in Jönköping and Rumlaborg in Huskvarna = 5,25 km (3,26 miles). If you check the walking distance, which is a bit longer than a bird's eye view, than it's 5,7 km. Move the church's point to the edge of the city center and it's less, move the castle point to the center of Huskvarna and it's more. That is indeed about 5 km. Emmarade (talk) 11:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we need a reliable source of a distance of "about 5 km"?
Talk:Lugbara language

message: If you are a native speaker of Lugbara then you can help translate this template into your own language:
 Edit
--Amazonien (talk) 22:31, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lugbara language template

message: I intended to merge Lugbara phrases to this article, per the AfD decision. But all of its content was already here. I don't know if someone copied it from there, or the older title Lugbara phrasebook. Copying needs to be noted in edit summaries or with the  template to comply with license rules. Cnilep (talk) 04:17, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged? 

message: Why is there no lugbara bible in Play store 41.210.147.218 (talk) 19:47, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bible 

message: Stop it 197.239.4.198 (talk) 15:33, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey
Talk:WHEN (AM)

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :WPHR (AM) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 6#WPHR (AM) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:44, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "WPHR (AM)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Kimberly Crest (Redlands, CA)

message: I suggest making this page into a redirect page and moving the effort over to Kimberly Crest. With names, I think the simpler, the better. Binksternet (talk) 22:22, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, it just made so much sense I went ahead and moved the page to Kimberly Crest. Binksternet (talk) 23:41, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: suggest moving
Talk:Ggulu

message: Hi, I've found that "sky, heaven" in Ganda (luganda) is "Eggulu". So why is here used the form "Ggulu"? Besides in the article "Ggulu" becames "Mugulu", too. As for "Walumbe/Warumbe", I've found both orthographies in Wikipedia. Which one is the standard orthography?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.181.89.73 (talk) 15:26, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ggulu/Eggulu - Walumbe/Warumbe
Talk:Song of Lawino

message: This article contradicts itself. It first says that Song of Lawino is a narrative poem. The next section explicitly denies that and claims that it is an indigenous form of poetry. Well which is it? 96.2.61.160 (talk) 08:52, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: About message  of song of Lawino and ocol 196.249.97.173 (talk) 11:07, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @196.249.97.173 Rubangakene Francis (talk) 08:51, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:Waragi

message: Besides the fact that most of the wording in the article sounds like the VICE video about Waragi, the section on "process" does not explain anything 
about the process by which Waragi is made rather it sounds much like a promotion of VICE videos. Not very encyclopedic. The VICE video contained
a number of factual errors and poor journalism as well and thus should not be taken as a source for anything beyond anecdotes
77.96.95.103 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 09:32, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Process.. or advert?

message: 2010 Uganda mass poisoning should be merged into this article because there is very little material not already covered here and there is no reason whatever unique material there is can't be merged.  This article is not very long and merging won't give the incident undue weight.  Furthermore, it is unlikely 2010 Uganda mass poisoning passes Wikipedia:Notability (events). None of these facts are unlikely to change. --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:20, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge suggestion

message: ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.228.115.5 (talk) 03:39, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  why cant  edit this article ?
Talk:Counties of Uganda

message: The Ugandan government has rapidly been subdividing districts, creating new ones. As of August 2012, there are 111, as is shown in the only reference in this article, http://www.statoids.com/uug.html. However, this article lists only 78 districts.—Quick and Dirty User Account (talk) 21:56, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: “Out of date” template

message: Please see the discussion I left on this talk page. If I do not receive a response from you or a self-revert, I will be reporting you for edit-warring. Cobblet (talk) 05:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: As for the removal of the word "also": the relevant quotes from the source are: "ISO 3166-2 Newsletter Number I-9 was published on 2007-11-28.... The newsletter listed alternate names for four districts:... Maracha (Maracha-Terego),..." and "Other names of subdivisions:... Nyadri: Maracha-Terego, Maracha (variant)..." In other words, Maracha District (not "the" Maracha District!) was already known by that name at the time of its creation; it just happens it was also called by other names. Cobblet (talk) 12:17, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  To the anonymous user who is reverting my edits 

message: Are there any articles or references or links that say that the counties are no longer in use, due to the recent increase of districts being created in the past 7-8 years? As most districts are directly subdivided into sub-counties; despite the fact that almost every district is subdivided into just one county. jlog3000 (talk) 00:41, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Counties no more?
Talk:King's College, Budo

message: Hmm. Since the school calls itself "King's College Budo", and perhaps its location should be the qualifier after the comma, then shouldn't the article's title be  "King's College Budo, Budo"? User:Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 02:47, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Makerere College School

message: Macos is a very good school and has an enabling environment that helps a student fully excel. Be known by works and only good works. 197.239.5.56 (talk) 20:43, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  English 

message: It is by calculations that we live on earth because one must calculate or think twice before acting. 197.239.5.56 (talk) 20:45, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mathematics
Talk:Inter-University Council for East Africa

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20170502072628/http://www.iucea.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1&Itemid=294. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Uganda Scheme

message: Why is it "program" as opposed to "programme"? Is there a reason for this? In the 20th century, I believe "programme" was the accepted form. Badgerpatrol (talk) 10:38, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: is it still spelled that way in the UK?  It seems to me that the reason it is spelled "program" is simply that this is how it is spelled today in most of the English speaking world.  It should be irrelevant how it was spelled in the early 20th century.  Rudy Breteler (talk) 05:30, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't say the early 20th century, I said the 20th century. This word is spelled "programme" in the UK and in most of the English speaking world. Previous to the 20th century, I think "program" may have been the accepted spelling wordlwide, hence my comment above, but as you say archaic forms are not particularly relevant. Today, "Program" is only used as a term in computing. Badgerpatrol (talk) 06:28, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

text: The accepted usage is "programme" in the UK, and if anything, this is a UK topic (more or less). The above comment raised little discussion in several months, so I have gone ahead and moved the page. If a noun, the title of the page should be "British Uganda Programme", and I think this is most accurate and appropriate here. Badgerpatrol (talk) 17:27, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Of what relevance is your opinion to improving the article ... which is the purpose of this page? And FWIW, you have misinterpreted the page -- Uganda was always seen as, at best, a temporary location. As for whether Zionism is an "obsession", the page does not and should not make any claim. -- 98.108.198.144 (talk) 20:36, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Programme

message: The Jewish Virtual Library article, which is very poor and doesn't even have an author indicated, should be replaced by something better. Zerotalk 12:07, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Since your post the JVL citation had been moved to the Kishinev mention. As there are 4 other citations there and it doesn't add much I deleted it. Mcljlm (talk) 10:57, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor source 

message: — Assignment last updated by Dolly City (talk) 19:36, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Zionism and the Roads Not Taken 1880-1948

message: Is there anything in the Jewish Virtual Library article on Herzl which isn't in the other sources cited next to it? If the JVL is cited at all perhaps https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-uganda-proposal-1903 would be better. Mcljlm (talk) 15:51, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish Virtual Library
Talk:Expulsion of Asians from Uganda

message: The article says 20 000 were unacounted for. Does this imply that they died? I believe there were at least rumors of deaths. Rmhermen (talk) 21:38, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deaths? 

message: The title of this article should be corrected to reflect what REALLY happened.Idi Amin specifically targeted people of INDIAN ethnic origin.He did NOT expel Arabs, Chinese, Pakistantis, Sri Lankans, Vietnames, Kazakhs, Turks, or other Asians. He did not even expel other SOUTH Asians - he ONLY expelled people whose ancestors came from INDIA.
The best title would be Expulion of Indo-Ugandans by Idi Amin.
The next-best title would be Expulsion of South Asians from Uganda.
Nota Bene: At the same time Amin expelled Indo-Ugandans, he promoted Muslim immigration from Pakistan. This clearly was a political rather than ethno-cultural move.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:645:8000:FAB0:ADE5:8D9:31E5:E0D9 (talk) 04:32, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The event exclusively affected Indian people and therefore "Asians" is a misnomer. The title should be changed from "Asians" to "Indians" 2601:246:C00:4F80:890B:3F29:EAAA:6E83 (talk) 17:30, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Cite a source that non-Indians weren't expelled. Then the title should be changed. DenverCoder9 (talk) 18:34, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Title shoulr be corrected

message: The title of the article uses "Asians", and there's a couple sentences in the article that hint at South Asians/citizens of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh being included... but the entire rest of the article is specifically about Indians being expelled. Even the opening sentence says "Indian minority" with no mention of other cultures. A prominent explanatory sentence on this is sorely needed. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 18:04, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently "Asian" meant "South Asian" at the time. I clarified the intro with more details. Thanks for asking this question! -- Beland (talk) 17:09, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Many of the "Asians" came before the partition of India, so Pakistan and Bangladesh had yet to gain their sovereignty. Windwiggler (talk) 15:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What cultures were expelled?  

message: Isn't this a euphemistic way of saying that the British favoured (South) Asians? Or rather, that Asians were a privileged stratum of society, at the expense of the native Aficans? The whole framing of them as a "minority" seems to be construed so as to make the Asians the victims here, when they were in fact the exploiter class foe decades. Time for a rewrite? 142.126.140.83 (talk) 14:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''"They had come to dominate trade under British colonial policies."''
Talk:Haar-like feature

message: Why should this be merged with Haar-wavelet
?
Hi. Just came up to read about the subject (I study bioinformatics) and found the article fine (needs some improvement though). As the previous commenter I don't see it appropiate to merge it with Haar-wavelet. Many people, like me, needs more information about the topic and is able to understand this subject, but does not have any idea about what a wavelet is. Keep it simple please. 62.93.183.215 (talk) 09:43, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: (For context, someone had suggested this article should be merged with Haar wavelet.) The merge request has since been removed. See the discussion at Talk:Haar wavelet#Merger. --Mrwojo (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Plukenetia volubilis

message: Things to do 
*Check spelling of: semileñosa & euphorbiaceous.
*Add userbox, incorporating Latin botanical name information at bottom of page.
*Research if used in diets because of its high nutritional value. (cultivated) sure to be.
:Appears to be marketed as a "super food on the internets.  make sure to write something about that.
*Find a picture (MOAR PIX PLS!!$#%#$%). 
:(get help on this, luddite me knows nothign about the pix or copyright or anything).
-Picture added as of 23 Oct, I took this in Ecuador. The lifted lorax (talk) 00:35, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Things to do 

message: *I can't seem to get the text to highlight, so it links out to other sites.  Others have criticized the legitimacy of Sacha Inchi and by providing external references, readers can verify the legitimacy themselves.Djc266 (talk) 15:40, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: * Can Sacha Inchi be included in the main title for the page, not many people know what sacha inchi is and even fewer know the scientific name.  Could it be included in parentheses?Djc266 (talk) 16:29, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: * It's a redir, which means that even if you search for "sacha inchi", you'll be directed here. Pretty much serves the same purpose. Yngvarr 17:24, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *Thank youDjc266 (talk) 19:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name versus scientific name 

message: * In the line "Its oil is one of the largest plant sources of the Omega family of fatty acids, an essential for human life. It contains Omega 3 (48%), Omega 6 (36%), Omega 9 (9%), and protein (27%)." the "and protein (27%)" needs to be taken out, as the "It" refers to the oil, adding up all the percentages we see that they are well over 100%, aside from that the mentioning of the protein is redundant.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fmoreira (talk • contribs) 17:23, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please clarify
Talk:Eir Sport 1

message: There seems to be an amount of confusion in relation to this channel. Setanta Ireland was started in 2006 for Irish customers and remains on the air unlike its British set of channels. Much of what is stated in this article should be removed to Setanta Sports. IrishTV (talk) 22:20, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Setanta Ireland Confusion 

message: Hi all,
I am looking to update the viewing share for the Irish channels (Virgin Media One, Virgin Media Two, Virgin Media Three, RTÈ One, RTÈ 2, TG4 and EirSport 1) using TAM Nielsen data from 2019. However, I have a Conflict of Interest as I am employed by one of them. I have posted this on all of the relevant pages as I'm hoping to get a consensus to go ahead.DarkerDai (talk) 09:00, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Do it yourself! WP:BOLD  14:18, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to Update Irish Channels Share of Viewing
Template talk:Air Forces of the Commonwealth of Independent States

message: removed USSR template from Latvian Air Force as no explanation of it's purpose is given on the template's talk page. Artlondon (talk) 11:47, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: By the way, I can give a reason - it's pretty simple. The articles Estonian Air Force, Lithuanian Air Force and Latvian Air Force stated that most aircrafts they have are of Soviet origin. NATO air forces of this countries are explained in the Baltic Air Policing article. --Yuriy Lapitskiy ~ 22:17, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  the article states most are Polish not soviet. less than a quarter are Soviet. Artlondon (talk) 02:33, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Latvian Air Force]] 

message: What is the purpose of such templates other than giving a chance to add Soviet imagery (which is quite correctly equalled to Nazi one) to articles? And, Bogdan, kindly please stop making inflammatory and false claims, unless you are talking about 4 cemeteries the magnificient Red Army flattened from 40s and 60s. Oth (talk) 08:13, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Equaling Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union is a biased statement, you know... Occupation or not, Baltic states were part of the USSR. I really don't understand the purpose of this discussion. --Yuriy Lapitskiy ~ 21:58, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't quite understand this either - the main discussion is above. Artlondon (talk) 22:00, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purpose 

message: Template: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Artlondon (talk) 15:52, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of [[:Template:{{ucfirst:Air Forces of the countries former Soviet Union}}]] 

message: I think we should we name it to Air Forces of the Commonwealth of Independent States, since it is the only way the Baltic States cannot be included--EZ1234 (talk) 05:03, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 

message: Will remove naval air arms in a few days unless anyone has any objections (as they are not air forces) Garuda28 (talk) 19:29, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the navboxes from the naval aviation articles per WP:BIDIRECTIONAL, as they are no longer listed in the navbox. BilCat (talk) 06:52, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naval Air Arms?