Talk:Emeril Lagasse

message: Emeril's wife's name is Alden. With an "N". Not Aldeh. 184.77.203.226 (talk) 16:50, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wife

message: There should be a sidenote about Lagasse being the inspiration for Elzar on Futurama.I couldnt find a reference right now though.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheLurkerattheThreshold (talk • contribs) 13:43, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Futurama

message: This whole article totally sucks. It's a disgrace. These morons talk about Emeril live being canceled before even mentioning what it is. Wikipedia is a damn joke......   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.156.157 (talk) 03:23, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Are there that many people that hate the "bam"? I know Bourdain has reservations about Emeril, but it is noted in his article (as is his aversion to Rachael Ray). -- Chris 04:53, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Late to the discussion, but yes. Really, it's a divide in the Culinary field. There are those of us who despise him, and others who like him/like the catchphrase. Luca 10:42, April 30 2006 (EST)
He was born in 1952 which makes the stated age of 53 incorrect.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.64.147.70 (talk) 19:48, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Complaints

message: There are no sources for criticism or praise. That's why I put up a template. --Crazysunshine 07:18, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources?

message: I realize that most people know him as "Emeril," but Wikipedia has a policy to use last names, not first names, after the first reference to someone. The only exception is for stars known only by their first name, such as Cher, a position for which Lagasse doesn't qualify. Even Elvis Presley is referred to as "Presley" in his article. Moreover, it's inconsistent as "Lagasse" is used in a few places. Explain?  Moncrief 18:56, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you think that's the worst problem with the article? It needs major cleanup for content as well as other style issues.  I just recently added the article to my watchlist and haven't done any editing besides vandal reverting, but given the general condition of the article, I wouldn't expect there was a particular motive for the usage of his first name that needs explaining. You should have just corrected it. AUTkxckbllklxlklklkbxiger » talk 20:07, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I think I've fixed them all and done some minor cleanup. Still needs more as well as some restructuring. AUTiger » talk 20:27, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Er, I didn't say I thought it was the worst problem in the article. The article needs major cleanup.  I was just pointing out this particular issue, and I didn't want to change it until I'd brought up the subject on the Talk page, which I thought would be the polite thing to do since I hadn't edited the page before, and perhaps there was some reason why he was being referred to by his first name that I wasn't aware of.  Moncrief 16:14, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry; in retrospect, I was apparently in an irascible mood last night. I do think it's fairly obvious looking at the state of the article, the history and the talk page that there aren't really any regular editors (caretakers) for the article. Hopefully, you approve of the cleanup I've done so far (definitely not finished) as well as the ToDos. AUTiger » talk 18:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is his first name used throughout?

message: There is no mention of his family in the article, except that the bio section discusses when he met his first wife. Doesn't make much sense to discuss his first wife without even mentioning his current one or any children.
MikeND05 01:38, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not left out intentionally; I got interrupted/distracted with other editing (and real life) in the middle of my big renovation of this page. Feel free to add the Personal section yourself with the family info. I know he and his son were just featured in a recent Food & Wine mag. AUTiger » talk 18:06, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography 

message: I don't think that this should be merged with the tv show. anybody else? RC-0722 (talk) 16:20, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The merge suggestion is the other way around, that the show should be merged into this article. As the sitcom only lasted 7 episodes, a paragraph or two in his article would cover it well and the article on the show right now is just a stub. AnmaFinotera (talk) 18:18, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merger 

message: I completely removed the section on Emeril's "coolness" and his influence over other "cool" chefs. I'll lay out my reasons here and let the community debate it before anyone decides on putting it back or keeping it out, or modifying it. But for now, let's keep it out untill we resolve this, because it makes the article look really unprofessional.
*Use of Subjective Ajective and Oppinion
- The term "cool" hardly seems appropriate for use in an encyclopedia (online, offline, opensource, or otherwise). It's completely arbitrary and open to personal tastes. There might be an argument that Lagasse paved the way for celebrity chefs, and ones that reached out to new, younger, demographics in particular. Emeril arguably brought a greater sense of culinary awareness to the masses (especially lower socioeconomic classes) while simultaneously taking popular cuisine and eating tastes and "elevating" them (or at least garnering them somewhat more respect amongst culinarians, thus part of the reason for the so-called divide between those that like and dislike his style). He also crossed the line between chef/television instructor and entertainer in a way that few other television chefs ever did--becoming a pop icon and connecting with mainstream audiences and attaining a level of popularity that was unprecedented (that should be cited, however). But to substitute the word "cool" is not an adequate discussion of these issues. "Cool" is open to interpretation and is a value judgement that has no place in this article. 
*No Citations
- That brings me to the next big problem, the article seems to take the stance that Lagasse is, in fact, cool, as are the other chefs listed and that they all have him to thank. Even if the section is modified to focus on real and impartial issues like popularity or style, there need to be citations in order to avoid this becoming an oppinion. Even if we assume Emeril is "cool" and his compatriates are as well, there is the problem of establishing his role in their success. I'm sure many a food writer has listed Emeril as a key figure in the food revolution of the past few years, but this is an argument, not a fact. Hence, cite it or remove it.
*Problem Examples
- The other "cool" chef's listed largely come from Food Network, that presents the question of bias in the labeling itself as well as the selected examples. The real problem is a confusion between "cool" and "mass appeal"/"popularity" as well as target demographics.  Or maybe I'm to understand that Food Network is synonomous with 
"cool chefs"? While I personally love the channel and its programming and I would also argue that there's a link between the network's success and the phenomenon of celebrity chefs and higher level cuisine in modern American pop culture, I would hardly say that this is impartial.
I doubt many of you needed much convincing on these points, but just in case, there you have it. Let's leave the section out entirely unless someone wants to rewrite it with appropriate citations, focus, and perspective. A serious look at Emeril's role in changes relating to the popularity and status of chefs, the phenomenon of the celebrity chef, and the popularity and perception of cooking and cooking styles in American cuisine are all valid topics, but I don't think Emeril's "coolness" is a valid section in any encyclopedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.74.102.247 (talk) 18:33, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cool"? Really??? 

message: I don't know what his exact date of birth is, but I believe what's listed is wrong. I remember a mention of his 50th b-day on TV years ago. The source may be incorrect.  MasterPainter (talk) 19:57, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 

message: The article says his birthplace is St. Louis, MO but the box says it was Fall River, MA. Does anyone know which one is right? Or is that trying to say he was born in Fall River and raised in St. Louis? Willcrys 84 (talk) 13:16, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace 

message: If his son is Emeril John Lagasse IV then logically this guy needs to have III added after his name in the opening line and in the top line of the data box under his photograph. Furthermore, his father's name seems to be missing the middle name of John, which logically it should have. Dick Kimball (talk) 19:51, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not necessarily. In many states you can name your kid more or less whatever you want. A UC Davis law professor wrote a very interesting research paper on this recently (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1747858). That his kid has the suffix "IV" does not necessitate that Emeril has the suffix "III" as part of his name. Same deal for the middle name. Theoretically, I can have a son and give him the suffix "XIV" even though we have completely different names. However I will concede that it's likely that Emeril has the suffix "III", and that his father has the middle name "John". —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 11:27, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full Name 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://emerils.com/about-emeril. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  GabrielF (talk) 05:17, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Emeril Lagasse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130918175344/http://www.emerilscooking.com/about.asp to http://www.emerilscooking.com/about.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:13, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Emeril Lagasse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.winespectator.com/Cigar/CA_Profiles/People_Profile/0,2540,216,00.html
*Added  tag to http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=9542380
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100115124758/http://www.biography.com:80/articles/Emeril-Lagasse-9542380?part=1 to http://www.biography.com/articles/Emeril-Lagasse-9542380?part=1
*Added  tag to http://www.greatchefs.com/emeril-lagasse/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930210106/http://sec.edgar-online.com/2004/04/02/0001047469-04-010612/Section2.asp to http://sec.edgar-online.com/2004/04/02/0001047469-04-010612/Section2.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:29, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Emeril Lagasse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070629161909/http://www.emerils.com/emeril/biography.html to http://www.emerils.com/emeril/biography.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.biography.com/articles/Emeril-Lagasse-9542380?part=1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040420200455/http://www.foodnetwork.com/food/show_ee/ to http://www.foodnetwork.com/food/show_ee
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:42, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article doesn't mention his clothing line. You can find shoes on his website. SharkD  Talk  04:36, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clothing 

message: The citation (#1) in the notes is a dead link, but I am sure some source can be found to verify his basic biography.AlexanderSoul (talk) 22:19, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  biography citation 

message: I can't find any evidence that Emeril was into Mixed Martial Arts and Boxing, I'm thinking that was incorrectly added? Also, I changed his height from 6'9" back to 5'7".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guyonphone (talk • contribs) 02:26, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixed Martial Arts/Boxing? 

message: :This article has "needs additional citations for verification" and "This section does not cite any sources" tags.
:The article falls under B-class criteria (#1): .
:As such these issues need resolving or the article reassessed according to the criteria.  Otr500 (talk) 15:25, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing issues