lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:5 Fingers

message: The article claims the information the Nazis received about D-day was purposely inaccurate, but it described a landing in Normandy on the first days of June.
In any case, this seems accurate enough to be extremely valuable, if not dead on.
The movie makes more sense that way, with the irony of the Nazis throwing out perfectly good and critical information out the window, literally.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frankman (talk • contribs) 16:06, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy of Information about D day 

message: There's a couple of points to be made about this movie but they really don't fit into the article as such. As in any movie (even documentaries) you can't take everything as gospel truth. Sometimes events are told out of order, two or more real life people are combined into one person, or even invented (the Polish countess is pure fiction, I think), and names, dates, and places are changed (The movie Adaptation comes to mind). A case in point is the part where the Germans don't tell the Rumanians about the impending bombing of the Ploesti oilfields. This would have never, ever happened in real life, as the oilfields were absolutely vital to the German war machine. (In truth, the oilfields were bombed, but it wasn't because the Germans deliberately allowed the British to do so.) 
The German ambassador, Franz von Pappen, was the Chancellor of Germany before Hitler (Kurt von Schleicher actually served between the two for all of two months). Once out of office he worked with Hitler and was instrumental in getting Hitler placed as Chancellor (which isn't an office that the people vote for). In other words he was instrumental in the creation of the 3rd Reich. The reasons why he did this are too involved to go in here. 
One last point: of the money Cicero got from the Germans what would it be worth today? After converting to dollars from Pounds and then calculating the rate of inflation, the £120,000 would be equivalent to about $8,000,000 today. Which explains why he lived so well down there in Argentina, until...  __209.179.0.121 (talk) 22:24, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  A couple of points about the movie
Talk:Māui (mythology)

message: It is not generally believed that it is Māui in Tongan. Even the most punctulous dictionary (Churchward) writes Maui rather than Māui.
Therefore one is suggested not to use this link. --Tauʻolunga 05:35, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Daktronics

message: I do not believe that signage is a word.  Am I wrong?  63.85.214.4 00:22, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  signage... 

message: The point of view in this article seems to advertise them, can someone please fix this with a netural point of view?
Look at the SportSound part.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.79.198.218 (talk) 00:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising 

message: Daktronics will work on the new scoreboard for target field in 2011. The team annouced earlier this month  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.126.100.154 (talk) 02:45, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Target Field 

message: Since the company began as a manufacturer of voting systems for legislatures, details need to be included (e.g., which states? other countries? when?). 66.234.204.13 (talk) 00:37, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electronic voting systems 
Talk:Custer State Park

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵💸 21:20, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Pequest River

message: Work in process. Bear with the mess. Modelling after my work on Paulins Kill which is currently being peer reviewed and nominated to be a good article and soon to be nominated as a featured article. —ExplorerCDT 05:42, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Current edit, 2/3 November 2006

message: From which language does this name come? Badagnani (talk) 17:58, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Wikipedia talk:Roadmaps for article titles

message: I see two distinct, large issues that need to be attacked before we can get this started. John Reid 05:39, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Method 

message: Should M be a subpage of U or a subpage of J? The former may make it easier to M + N while the latter may be better at inviting participation from editors at J. John Reid 05:39, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Residence 

message: M not branch is not best displayed as a list; it is a small graph. Note that every B >> A must be shown, while we will also want (for efficiency) to transclude the same M onto C and D. Therefore, on M we need to show C + A, D + A, &c. Meanwhile, P is a directed, weighted graph. 
How can we display this geometry so that it is (a) compact, attractive, and clear; and (b) accessible to anybody-can-edit? Obviously, image formats are out. John Reid 05:39, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Display 

message: Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention.  Badbilltucker 19:31, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Day Awards 

message: I think I grasp the general intent of this WikiProject, so I'm going to join and hopefully learn more about the logical dependancies you are using here. Maybe it can get off the ground and work in conjunction with the more active Disambiguation project, or perhaps due to the size it's more appropriate as a task force? Tyciol (talk) 16:12, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing but interesting

message: This essay seemed to have promise but has gone nowhere. I can't figure it out. A shame. Student7 (talk) 22:09, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing but interesting (2)
Talk:Microcom

message: I worked at Microcom in the late 80s.
Their first products were The Electronic Mailbox and the SX series of modems. The SX series was before my time and I don't know if it included error correction.  I don't think that it did, but I believe it did include compression of (if my memory serves me) MNP class 2 which used SDLC as the link level protocol to improve throughput by eliminating the start and stop bits of the asynchronous protocols.
I am writing this because the early history here is inaccurate, but I do not have the information to fill in the blanks, as these products were before my time.
There also needs to be text added about the MicroPorte series of modems,  as well as clarification about the relationship between Microcom and Rockwell.
Then there is the whole issue of the niche modem, the QX/12K which was based on the Hycom chip manufactured by Sharp Microelectronics.
I will try to add what I can.
Broh.
:Go ahead and edit away! Just put in anything you can remember, I'd be happy to copyedit if it needs it. And what is the relationship between them and Rockwell? Maury 13:32, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Broad spectrum revolution

message: Actully yes, a book that was assigned to me for my Anthropology 111-A class; Anthropology The Exploration of Human Diversity Eleventh Edition by Conrad Phillip Kottak (who apparrently works/worked at the University of Michigan). In the first paragraph of chapter 10 it says:
"With glacial retreat, foragers pursued a more generalized economy, focusing less on large animals. This as the beginning of what Kent Flannery (1969) has called the broad-spectrum revolution. This refers to the period beginning around 15,000 B.P. in the Middle East and 12,000 B.P. in Europe, during which a wider rane, or broader spectrum, of plant and animal life was huntd, gathered, colledted, caught, and fished. It was revolutionary because, in the Middle East, it led to food production-human control over the reproduction of plants and animals."
Now My form of writing would be less `wordy', and I would change it to something like "It was 'seen' as revolutionary because..." to make it so that it is described as a fact and not an opinion.
P.S. That's only from one paragraph i.e. there's still the rest of that section that goes over the broad-spectrum theory along with the rest of the chapter that gives topics that are related to this.--The King of the Hippies 10:47, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Morini (manufacturer)

message: I have removed comments from an unknown editor stating that it was withdrawn from the market, because of a problem brought to the attention of Morini by competitive shooters, but I can not find any reference to this and Morini currently lists it on the official site. --Deon Steyn 05:57, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: CM 32
Talk:U.S.S.R. Life from the Other Side

message: This link has a different track listing: . - Zepheus <ツィフィアス> 06:01, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Emyli

message: Cutie? Undoubtedly. Notable? The article doesn't really make the case that she is, at the moment. --kingboyk 19:04, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable 
Talk:Ole Edvart Rølvaag

message: Can it be that we have no pictures of Ole Edvart Rølvaag?
Skål - Williamborg (Bill) 01:05, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ole Edvart Rølvaag pictures 

message: Two questions:  
# Article does not detail when the book was written, translated or published, information which should be readily available.
# Not quite sure how he wrote the book in a house in South Dakota while he was a professor in Northfield Minnesota.  Sabbatical?
Anyone with the time and resources to fix thisTjoeC (talk) 19:54, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Giants in the Earth 

message: What honors or awards did Rolvaag receive? I see that he was appointed Knight of the Order of St Olav by King Haakon VII in 1926. Did he receive any other awards or honors? Academic or literary honors? Did his writings receive any awards? Pete unseth (talk) 15:04, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honors and awards?
Talk:Madison, South Dakota

message: *should we add past events like the flood and historic landmarks by chance--Serge222 14:26, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Chilean Army

message: Why does this article not discuss the Chilean army's role in Pinochet's dictatorship? --Killing Vector (talk) 11:47, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Pinochet regime

message: According to this page, the army consists of 36500 personnel in 6 divisions, an air brigade and a special ops brigade.
But according to the page Military of Chile: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_of_Chile it consists of 80000 personnel in 7 divisions and an air brigade.
Will post on the Military of Chile talk page as well, but since Chilean Army has a source and Military of Chile has not, I guess this page is correct.
Lovkal (talk) 12:34, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the right army size? 
Talk:Creation vs. Evolution

message: This page is meant for evidence against evolution. The name would have changed if I could change it to "Creation's Evidence Against Evolution". I plan to add much more to this page later.
I have supplied a few links and sources for this page, so I am not speaking off of my own opinions. This page could be added onto Creation-evolution Controversy if need be instead of being a separate page.
Question: Why does my page have to be nuetral when the Evolution page is not? It states things AS fact. I am simply supplying evidence against evolution, but not as fact, and I have supplied sources, and I plan to add more later.
:It has mostly to do with the WP policy on undue weight for minor viewpoints. While creationism may be your viewpoint (and it should never be obvious from your writing here what your viewpoint is!), it's a small-minority view. The vast majority of scientists consider evolution to be as close to proven as a scientific theory gets, similar in stature to gravity and the atomic theory. A small minority may believe the earth is flat, but due to the overwhelming consensus we present the earth's round shape as fact due to the fact it's a large majority viewpoint, and the flat-earthers are a small minority. Creationism may have enough followers to deserve mention (as even the flat-earthers do), but the vast majority of scientists do not take it seriously. Given that, equal weight would be undue weight. Seraphimblade 06:35, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ALL pages are neutral, or at least the attempt to make them neutral is made.  Your arguement is, more or less, like saying that Mars (planet) is biased to gas giants. -WarthogDemon 06:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

text: The evolution page is neutral. If you have an issue you think is not neutral you should discuss it there, not make your own fork. (Also please sign your comments with four tildes  ~~~~  which will make your user name and time of post appear like this JoshuaZ 06:28, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You'll probably do best to direct your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creation vs. Evolution in this situation. You may also want to see the five pillars of Wikipedia and/or deletion policy for more information. Thanks for your time, whatever happens. Luna Santin 06:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Bold Journey

message: I'm pretty sure that the John Stephenson here is John Stephenson (actor), better known as Mr. Slate on The Flintstones; the IMDb lists the host of Bold Journey as "John Stevenson", for whom it has a separate name listing, but notes that John Stephenson was sometimes credited as "John Stephenson", adding to the confusion.  So, does anybody know for sure?  Rlquall 06:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Fifaxbox

message: The following comments were reverted to counteract page blanking:
"Keep this site over 10,000 hits a day  	 
----
Keep this site: Professional, interesting (maybe not to everyone, but nowadays what does interest everyone?), professional articles linked to member of the site --Themanthelegend13 23:10, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted comments
Talk:Psy-Geo-Conflux

message: Event is notable, as confirmed by the references section at the bottom of the page.  It is the subject of numerous, extensive reviews in reliable independant sources.  However, the writing is a mess, so I added a clean-up tag.  I have no personal knowledge of the event, not do I have much interest in the subject.  I will leave it for someone more knowledgable and interested to fix this. --Jayron32 06:33, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: On the removal of the PROD
Talk:Music of Miami

message: I will personally provide more sources for this article over the next few weeks.  Improvements to the article are welcome, but just wiping it out isn't proper.  Please discuss any proposed changes here on the talk page.  Dreadlocke  ☥  06:38, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources and article content

message: This album cover requires a fair use rational for each appearance in articles. I've added rational for As Nasty As They Wanna Be and 2 Live Crew, but if no rational is given for this article, it will be removed from it. See Wikipedia:Image_description_page#Non-template. -- JamesHoadley 12:54, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use rational needed for [[:Image:As_Nasty_As_They_Wanna_Be_cover.jpg]] 
Talk:New Democratic Party candidates in the 1980 Canadian federal election

message: The Hamilton Spectator printed an obituary for a "Don Gray", aged 52, in September 2006.  Is this the same person?  CJCurrie 06:48, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Don Gray

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:New Democratic Party of Canada candidates, 2011 Canadian federal election which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 02:31, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:The Show Where Diane Comes Back

message: This is my first article.  Please go easy on me, although I welcome your comments and suggestions. Chick3magnet 06:51, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Anyone know whas the deal with the closer?  Eddie is chewing a sock, and martin takes it away.  It fades through black to Eddie with a thought bubble saying "i cant help it, its what i do" or something, then fades back to eddie digging out another sock.
Is it a reference to something? -Jdhannan (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 05:36, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closer 

message: The article has the following:
:As well as providing closure for the Frasier / Diane relationship from Cheers, this episode also allowed Kelsey Grammer and Shelley Long to reconcile offstage; on Cheers, Shelley Long had wanted to get rid of Frasier because she wanted Sam and Diane back together, while Kelsey Grammer and the producers had wanted to keep him on. This resulted in bad feeling between the two, which was settled during the making of this episode. As a result, Kelsey Grammer has identified this episode as one of his favourites.
Can we get a source for this? - Tbsdy lives (talk) 22:04, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source
Talk:Throggs Neck

message: According to http://gis.nyc.gov/nycha/im/AddressMap.do the area in which The Throggs Neck Houses are on is called Schuylerville and the area just south or below it is called Edgewater park. can any one make these into their own articles  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.23.221.70 (talk) 01:49, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  sub sections 

message: Up near the top of the article, it says that it's most commonly spelled "Throgg's Neck". Oh, yeah? NYC, born and raised, and NEVER have seen it spelled with two g's. Also, it says "often referred to as "Frogs Neck". Yeah. I used to refer to it as that---- when I was about eight years old. WHO refers to it as "Frogs Neck"? I mean, in addition to pre-adolescents? I decided not to edit it out, but I did put a symbol after it. I wonder how long THAT has been in the article? And NOBODY has noticed it before now??? It seems to me that it's vandalism.Slater79 (talk) 20:27, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: see. Jim.henderson (talk) 03:25, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Frog's Neck"

message: The article states that the name came from that of John Throckmorton, who settled there in 1642.  Following the link, I find that he was 118 years old and 62 years deceased when he arrived there.  Fascinating!  I knew some accomplished astonishing things in life.  I hadn't realized there were others who accomplished so much in death!4.237.44.122 (talk) 03:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the name Throgs Neck 

message: You've probably noticed that I moved the article from Throgs Neck to Throggs Neck and changed over the spelling from Throgs to Throggs in all instances except where it refers to the bridge or the lighthouse.  
I did this because the word is most commonly spelled with two Gs.  The alternate spelling was, as stated in the article, only created because the traditional spelling was in some cases too long to fit on signs.  While the one-G version is technically correct for the bridge, expressway and lighthouse, the location is correctly spelled with two Gs.  As a lifelong resident of Throggs Neck, I can attest firsthand to the fact that "Throggs" is the locally-recognized spelling.  In addition, I have supplied references to two books authored by a local historian since 1990 that refer in their titles to "Throggs Neck."
Tom9d (talk) 20:38, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Throgs Neck to Throggs Neck 

message: This article has two maps. One of them covers everything up to Westchester Square, the other one defines Throggs Neck as being south of Lafayette Avenue. Which one is right?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.211.222 (talk) 23:49, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two maps, very different areas 

message: Added a link to an article about Edgewater Park.  Significant neighborhood deserves mention in TN article.BrandenburgG (talk) 19:49, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Edgewater Park
Talk:Wall Drug

message: The first few paragraphs of this article bear a striking resemblance to a couple paragraphs in Chris Anderson's new book, Free. Because the article has no references, it should be rewritten or cited.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.23.5.132 (talk) 03:06, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Haha.  Just saw this comment.  It subsequently came out that Anderson lifted text from wikipedia for his book.--Milowent (talk) 17:35, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: They still have a real pharmacy - one of the several shops at the place is THE DRUG STORE itself, which is prolly the most mundane element in the place, but it's true to its name, so there you have it :D. Firejuggler86 (talk) 05:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible plagarism

message: In the space exploration computergame SAIS the player may encounter the artifact "Platinum Time Capsule" wich is described as "A platinum canister with a screw-top lid. It contains several laser viewcubes and a digital hyperwave advertisement: Only 2374.6 light years to Wall Drug". (SAIS is a great game, but I'm tired of admins deleting information because it's not deemed valuable enough so I won't start an article about it.) --BjKa (talk) 18:18, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal for Section: References in Popular Culture 

message: What's that supposed to mean? Are they contiguous? Is that the sum when they're laid end to end? Maybe a wording of "so and so many billboards spread over a stretch of so and so many miles" would be a better description? --BjKa (talk) 10:56, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've fixed this to read a bit better. <sidenote>And, oh man. Coming from somebody who lives along the I-90 corridor in South Dakota, you have no idea how annoying these things are.</sidenote> TCN7JM 12:25, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Y'all gotta have something to keep you awake in all those hundreds of miles of endless prairie...the signs scattered on the grass lands add a small bit of spice to that, and the make it impossible for anyone to forget that they can have coffee for 5¢, to keep you going when its all gotten old :P Firejuggler86 (talk) 06:02, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "500 miles of billboards" 

message: No mention that Wall Drug used to buy as space on London buses? (Yeah, weird, but it just emphasizes how American self-promotion can sometimes be notable for being so well-known.) I figure a picture of one of these ads is easily acquired under a free license with a simple request. -- llywrch (talk) 23:00, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  An omission