Talk:WrestleMania X

message: I felt that given the historical impact of WresstleMania X, a more comprehensive introduction for the show is necessary.
70.73.26.231 19:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. GaryColemanFan (talk) 07:30, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

message: :Image:WMXmichaels.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:WMXmichaels.jpg

message: I have reviewed the article against the Good Article criteria. Overall the article meets the criteria, being well written, adequately referenced and comprehensive.  There does not appear to be any problems with neutrality and stability. The linking of wrestling jargon is particularly well done and useful for non-enthusiasts such as me.  However there are some issues I would like to see addressed before I promote the article.
*In a general sense, overuse of the word "which".  Some examples listed below:
**"...was the WWF Championship, which was defended in two matches" Consider the less wordy "...was the WWF Championship, which was defended in two matches".
**Similarly, "Owen ran into Bret, which caused Owen to lose his focus..." --> "Owen ran into Bret, causing Owen to lose his focus..."
**and "...to resolve an angle in which the two had argued over the rightful holder..." --> "...to resolve an angle where the two had argued over the rightful holder.
**and one from further down the article "Wippleman and Finkel wrestled a series of Tuxedo matches in 1994,[18] which culminated in..." --> Wippleman and Finkel wrestled a series of Tuxedo matches in 1994,[18] ending with..."  These are examples only and is not exhaustive.
*** Most "which"es removed. GaryColemanFan (talk) 03:01, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That addresses everything except the commas, which are grammatically correct as they are. Please let me know if anything else needs to be fixed. Thank you so much for reviewing the article. GaryColemanFan (talk) 03:01, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well done again on addressing the matters raised so quickly.  I disagree about the commas; the conjunctions are designed to link the various clauses and the commas are redundant.  However, as stated above, this may be a personal preference only and not something to hold up any promotion.  I couldn't see anything at WP:MOS either way on the matter. As I have no further objections the article is now promoted.  Congratulations to all contributors. -- Mattinbgn\talk 03:42, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA review

message: Maybe I missed it but, there doesn't seem to be mention of "President Clinton"'s appearance. Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.30.248.68 (talk) 12:50, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: President Clinton?