Talk:Canadian electoral system

message: A lot of the text has been put in bold.  It seems unnecessarily distracting to me, making it look a bit like a ransom note.  Am I the only one who thinks so?  HistoryBA 14:32, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead and try your hand, gotta see different things to know what looks best.
Alot of writing is either in bold or italics, almost like its trying to stress a point. Whats up with that?--Trevorprella (talk) 23:42, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting 

message: :Image:Can-pol w.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:40, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Can-pol w.jpg

message: There was some incoherency on the page regarding the new fixed election law and the constitutional rule requiring elections every five years. I got fairly well written information from the Elections_in_canada page. I also added information about the King-Bing affair [http:http://www.canadahistory.com/sections/documents/news/1926kingbing.htm] where the Governor General of the day (Byng actually, but it comes up under King-Bing everywhere) denied the Prime Minister an election and asked the next largest party if they form government which they did.
Question: Many thought that the Governor General was going to do the same thing last year when Harper asked for an election in September. In the end she didn't but it was a suspense. Is it to NPOV or POV to add this fact in (written up in a less POV wording)? I ask because I think with the increases in minority governments and (in my view) the fact that we will likely have quite a few of them over the next little while (although there may still be majority governments too) makes it relevant. Marcie (talk) 23:38, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fixed Election Date Update and Question Regarding NPOV of adding King-Bing affair to the page

message: ...copied this from EC's website? It refers to Elections Canada in the first person! 76.117.247.55 (talk) 23:13, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who on Earth... 

message: It would be great to have a section explaining how, for example, in 2019 the liberals lost the popular vote but still came out ahead.I still don't quite get this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sara.koopman (talk • contribs) 21:48, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Conservatives had alot of votes in some provinces and not enough in others. 1 vote in Alberta is worth less than 1 vote in Quebec as an example. Certain provinces are over represented in the government. It's not based on geographic size of area, it's not based on population, it just is what it is. Kav2001c (talk) 05:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  popular vote