Talk:Macroeconomic model

message: :Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg

message: Large macroeconomics model should be mentioned specifically in the article. Jackzhp (talk) 22:16, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Many macroeconomic models are 'large'. What do you have in mind, exactly? --Rinconsoleao (talk) 17:10, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Large macroeconomics model

message: The name of the subject is Macroeconomics. Macroeconomic is not even an adjective. This word does not exist and has no use here in Wikipedia. All spellings and grammar that involve this change should be corrected. This is along with a lot of other changes, because as already pointed out, the quality and content of the work here is very poor. An example of a macroeconomics model has been added by me. Whilst this model is not the most ideal it is a lot better than nothing and does manage to explain what is meant by the subject.Macrocompassion (talk) 10:02, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Check out this Google scholar search. "Macroeconomic model" is much used. CRETOG8(t/c) 12:17, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

text: Cretog8 has point. There are 22,500 hits for "macroeconomic model" and just 322 for "macroeconomics model". What matters most is how the term is used in the article's sources. Also, can't we use the word as an adjective in phrases such as "macroeconomic context" or "macroeconomic system"? Jojalozzo 17:36, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language Use 

message: Dr. Pagan has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Pagan has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:
*Reference : Hyeon-Seung Huh & Lance Fisher & Adrian Pagan, 2014. "Econometric Methods for Modelling Systems with a Mixture of I(1) and I(0) Variables," EcoMod2014 7225, EcoMod.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 14:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Pagan's comment on this article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Macroeconomic model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130122123833/http://www.egwald.com/macroeconomics/keynesian.php to http://www.egwald.com/macroeconomics/keynesian.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:18, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It is necessary to model the whole of the system of a national macroeconomy. Yet, for ease of understanding it, we need to limit the size and details to a minimum. I have a solution to this which is on the internet as SSRN 2865571 "Einstein's Criterion Applied to Logical Macroeconomics Modelling". This model has only 6 sectors (or agents) and has 19 different mutual (or dual) connections for the flows of money in return for goods, services, etc. 2A06:C701:7431:EC00:D019:CDC2:28E7:6270 (talk) 15:08, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Macroeconomic model that is fully comprehensive