lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Customer satisfaction

message: I noticed that the English page on Customer Satisfaction only links to the Vietnamese Wiki article, and the German, French, Czech, Italian, Swedish, are all linked together, but not to this one. I can't figure out how to link the two together, and I don't have time to do figure it out now, but I think it could be a good thing to do... Masaryk19 (talk) 08:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kundenzufriedenheit?
Talk:Tater

message: I love Taters.  They are tasty. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bradfordwalker  (talk • contribs) 03:28, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since when is Sam the person/character who "most prominently used" the word "tater"? I mean honestly, I think I can safely say that I have used it more in the past 2 weeks than Sam did in the entire Lord of the Rings trilogy. CombatRaven 23:34, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 6 May 2006
Talk:Transitology

message: transitionology
is the real name of this subject.
Notable academics
I find it astounding that who ever authored this page makes no mention of the political scientist, Dankwart A. Rustow, who identified the theory of transistology in the introduction, or notable academics section. Furthermore, the list of notable academics is Columbia-centric - no bias there at all....
I would seek a revision of the aforementioned sections by an appropriate expert on the subject matter. 
I will cite Rustow.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.203.234.116 (talk) 11:49, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

message: This article doesn't seem to get edited a lot, so I doubt anyone will mind, but I plan on expanding the "notable academics" section quite a bit and if I have time adding some stuff to the other sections. Since I'm new to Wikipedia I'd love if some other editors wouldn't mind watching out a bit and letting me know if I mess something up. Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdh9 (talk • contribs) 04:32, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plan to add more to this for the next couple of days.
Talk:Attendant circumstance

message: It is a statement of the legally obvious that a prosecution must prove all of the elements specified in the definition of the offence. This page does not seem to refer to a defence in any sense that I recognise except and inso far as a judge, as a matter of law, could dismiss a case if the prosecution had failed to adduce evidence on all the consituent elements of the offence, and a jury could acquit in the ordinary course of events if they were not satisfied that the offence was made out. Equally, stating that "attendant circumstances" may be a factor in sentencing hardly makes it a defence. I am going to remove the page from the template to stimulate discussion. David91 03:47, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: A candidate for deletion?
Talk:Thornyhold

message: :The same as any other book by Mary Stewart? This article is both messy and POV — Falerin<talk>,<contrib> 03:54, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject International law

message: Hello everyone. AfC available for comment for Marcelo Kohen, Professor of International Law at The Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies and Secretary-General of the Institut de Droit International. Suprisingly, Kohen did not have a Wikipedia page.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_talk:Marcelo_Kohen 
I am new around and have started to contribute to international law articles. Let me know if I can be of any assistance.
Thank you!
Pugliese23 (talk) 12:36, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice of AfC on Marcelo Kohen 

message: Hi all, myself and others would like the additional input of others in reaching a consensus for determining what to include/exclude on List of military alliances as there have been some minor disagreements recently when attempting to clean up the List. I would like to invite everyone to contribute to the discussion here. Thank you, —  dainomite   20:48, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking for additional input on [[List of military alliances]] 

message: I made a proposal for some updates to the Edelson article a few months ago, which might be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Unfortunately, the Request Edits Queue seems to be stuck right now, and since I have a conflict of interest I won’t make any changes to the page myself. Is anyone in this Project interested in taking a look at these proposals, by any chance? Thanks very much. Mtd6596 (talk) 20:54, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed updates to Edelson article 

message: Hello,Please note that International trade law, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! 
Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian sports/Sport governing bodies

message: Are we going to include state bodies here? I may not have done much so far, but I've always planned to write articles on netball's state bodies after doing Netball Australia. :) Ambi 04:12, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see why not. I've started an article on Netball Australia :).--cj | talk 04:59, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day guys, I'd just thought I would let you know that I have started the article on Swimming Australia which I have been meaning to do for a while now. Cheers -- Ianblair23 (talk) 03:43, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:Brad Smith (American football, born 1983)

message: This may be too much of a fine line for a Wikipedia article, but I'm new so I'm asking. The article (correctly) states that he is the 6th person in college football to throw for 200 yards and run for 200 yards in the same game. I think he's in a lot more exclusive group with the 225/225 crowd. However, I can't find the numbers right now. Anyways, I think that lowers it to like 4 at most, maybe even that he's the only player ever. Is that too little of a distinction? Jklharris 07:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accomplishments 

message: Smith is listed as a quarterback in the intro section but lists him as a wide out in the info box. Cjstanonis (talk) 15:34, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The correct term is utility player because he has been known to play both positions in addition to returning kicks. -- The Writer 2.0 Talk 19:56, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro section
Talk:Battle of the Aleutian Islands detailed account

message: This article is written entirely from an American perspective, especially with the substitution of "the enemy" for the Japanese. Sorry I don't have time to fix this right now. --YixilTesiphon Say hello Consider my Wikiproject idea 04:22, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV issues 

message: As this entry is nothing but a copy-and-paste of a US Army booklet which is freely available on at least two internet sites, it's hard to determine what its value is. Why not just provide a link to the booklet on the Battle of the Aleutian Islands entry? --Nick Dowling 03:57, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Entry of dubious value

message: Appears to be a direct copy of http://www.army.mil/CMH-PG/brochures/aleut/aleut.htm can whoever is editing this check to see if it should be tagged copyvio - I don't want to stomp on your work Wakemp 16:04, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is still way, way to similar to the External link provided and Wikipedia doesn't endorse copy-and-paste style writing.  I'm tagging this article for deletion. Oberiko 15:26, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright
Talk:Royal Navy Dockyard

message: former dockyards - sheerness, or was it part of Chatham ??? --160.5.247.213 04:30, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Notre Dame Victory March

message: I graduated from a public high school, Ballard High School (Louisville), that at the time, (I graduated in 1974), used the tune for its fight song.  I have no idea if it is still used by Ballard.  I understand that other public schools use it as well. --rogerd 04:32, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public High Schools use of the tune 

message: Please, let's try to keep the mention of the song as "one of the most popular..." in accordance with WP:NPOV. Just because one professor thinks it is the best, doesn't mean this encyclopedia should say it is the best. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 14:26, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I have removed the "Usage by other sports teams" section as it was an non-encyclopedic list of various non-notable high schools and college who learned to play this song. Maintaining this list is WP:NOT the purpose of Wikipedia. Prhartcom (talk) 22:36, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed section 

message: I think that most people outside the US know this primarily from the film Airplane! where it is used throughout.  Does this deserve a mention in the article? --  JediLofty Talk to meFollow me 09:49, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airplane!
Talk:Falcon Ridge Folk Festival

message: Does anyone have detailed information about the new location FRFF will have next year? Joshw 04:39, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Falcon Ridge Moving 

message: As part of a move to get this page out of stub-land, I've decided to take over spearhead a movement to make this page the best folk festival encyclopedia entry out there.   As part of that movement, I'm asking folks to help plan for the structure we'll end up with...
So far, using other folk festival pages as a springboard, I'm thinking we'll need categories for:
- festival History (w/ subcategories about the big move in 1990, and the move away from Long Hill in 2006)
- an overview of the fest itself (mostly there, just needs a heading
- external links
what else? Jfarber 01:52, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time to start thinking categories... 
Talk:Walden O'Dell

message: I do not have time to edit this right now but would find it in the best interest of Wikipedia that this page be labeled with a "questionable neutrality" tag. This article is extremely biased and makes assertions and takes out of context quotes. It also fails to tell the truth, instead citing paranoia and suspicion rather than fact. As a sort of encyclopedia, I'd figure this site would be above an article like this. This is absolutely rediculous.
Does anybody have a link for the full text of the letter from which Mr. O'Dell's famous "committed to delivering" quote comes from? I've been trying to track it down online, but can't find it yet.--71.224.252.7 03:58, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions for Research

message: http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Diebold_insider__alleges_company_plagued_1206.html
I'm not sure why the last contributor's edits were reverted. It seemed to add another (quite reasonable) side of the story, namely, that the influence of a CEO over lower-level programmers is pretty limited. (And the Dilbert reference is pretty funny.) Looking at the contributor's edits on other topics, it doesn't seem like this was the work of a troll.
Moderator: REVERT your EDIT!
I do not have time to edit this right now but would find it in the best interest of Wikipedia that this page be labeled with a "questionable neutrality" tag. This article is extremely biased and makes assertions and takes out of context quotes. It also fails to tell the truth, instead citing paranoia and suspicion rather than fact. As a sort of encyclopedia, I'd figure this site would be above an article like this. This is absolutely rediculous.
:It was an unsourced assertion of a POV. "Funny" is not a criteria we use to judge contributions. If the editor can find a legitimate source spouting the opinion then it can be added. -Will Beback 03:45, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: (Previous Talk)
Talk:John Wright

message: I suggest that the John Wrights who actually have a (meaningful - more than 2 or 3 sentence) page be listed at the top of this disambiguation page, and if another John Wright page is added to the encyclopedia, the position of that John Wright in this list can be reconsidered. -DoctorW 04:49, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite a few John Wrights have been added to this page in the past 9 months (looks like it has doubled), and it seems that my thoughts above are outdated. It is becoming harder to find the John Wright that the reader is looking for. I am going to alphabetize the list. -DoctorW 18:38, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Webchick

message: *The fragment "...is known as one of the early pioneering forces of web design..." needs to be reworked.  
Please rework it to explain who said this about the webchick and provide a reference.
*Ditto for the phrase "...which was recognized for its creative and technical excellence alongside...".  Rework it to show who recognized them and provide a source.
As it reads this article seems like a commercial.
TheRingess 05:10, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Passive Voice
Talk:Shōsōin

message: Shosoin is today a proper noun that specifically means only the treasure house at Todai-ji.
This is the likely cause of some confusion seen in the previous text.
Referrals to the treasure houses (called 宝物庫 etc. in Japanese) at other temples are removed from this page.
The second sentence is still open for review.
--OhMyDeer 05:06, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shosoin is a proper noun

message: Agree. --OhMyDeer 13:23, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Suggested

message: “The Shōsō-in is also the only building to survive the Siege of Nara in the Heian period.”
This is incorrect. Another building in the Tōdai-ji temple, the Tegaimon Gate, also survived the war. 106.132.238.37 (talk) 01:47, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake in article
Talk:'Not happy, John!' campaign

message: The external website no longer seems to have campaign information. It only has information about Margo Kingston's book. Winterelf 23:11, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External website no longer relevant?
Talk:Luna (Sailor Moon)

message: I'm 99% certain that Luna is not in the last few episodes of Stars (the senshi leave her behind at the Hikawa Shrine to fight Galaxia), but I don't have the episodes to double check.  I'm waiting on confirmation.  Just a note. Danny Lilithborne 05:19, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Does Luna deserve a "Super Hero Box" on her page like the senshi and Tuxedo Mask? She has powers of her own (besides Speech) and is a hero in her own right. I wouldn't mind being the one to add it. (I added Tuxedo masks) I just wondered if she should get one. (Along with Artimis and Diana) --Lego3400 18:19, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's notable also that she has a bit of telekinetic powers in the manga, but I'm not sure if that should be added. Hitsuji Kinno 18:49, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Super Hero Box"?

message: Ok we either need a pic here or on the PGSM Page Do you guys want me do dig around again?Lego3400: The Sage of Time 17:08, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is one on the PGSM page now. I think it'd probably be okay here. --Masamage 02:59, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Quality pics are scarce.  We should probably use the same one.  -SaturnYoshi THE VOICES 09:07, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sailor Luna 

message: merge the cats
should the three cats luna artemis and diana be merged together since thers not much on there own i just cant think what to call it Sailor cuteness 19:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Replied at Talk:Artemis (Sailor Moon). --Masamage 22:47, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge the cats 

message: I'd prefer to leave out the "(manga, PGSM)" qualifier after Luna's transformation ability mainly because it lengthens the content. Is there any compromise? Even in the manga, she only transforms due to pretty series external circumstances. Maybe there's a better wording, like "has human form" or something? --Masamage 20:46, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I had removed it before because she transforms into a human in the anime as well.  -SaturnYoshi THE VOICES 08:36, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but only thanks to Usagi and the Ginzoushou. Plus that story is based complety on a manga side story. Its not really. --Lego3400:  The Sage of Time 00:38, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's still the anime.  Most of the series is based on the manga.  -SaturnYoshi THE VOICES 05:48, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

text: We don't get to declare what's canon and what's not. Also, she never changes human under her own power in the manga, either. --Masamage 08:37, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transformation into human
Talk:Bizen Museums

message: This article has no Japanese equivalent, any content has been merged with the article Bizen ware. Gryffindor (talk) 22:40, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: So, you already merged the content, or you're going to? If you've already merged it, just redirect this article. There's barely any content in it anyway. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 00:18, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Historiographical Institute of the University of Tokyo

message: they  have nice bars.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.220.31.166 (talk) 22:09, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Talk:University of Puget Sound

message: I noticed that in July, 2017 information about PSU's documented religious affiliation to the United Methodist Church was added to the page. However, in November, 2021, "minor revisions" were made that nearly eliminated any reference to their continued connection to the UMC (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=University_of_Puget_Sound&diff=next&oldid=1050653527).
In spite of the fact that some might not consider this institution "religious", shouldn't the November, 2021 "minor revisions" be reversed or reapplied? Both https://www.pugetsound.edu/about-puget-sound-0/history-traditions/united-methodist-church-affiliation and https://www.umhef.org/about/schools/listofschools/ give a clear indication that there is an "affiliation" and that affiliation has some degree of impact on the institution and its students regardless of anyone's particular awareness or preference? Jimdmurphy (talk) 19:07, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religious Affiliation 

message: The endowment amount is outdated. Can we update to $448.6 million (2023)?
Source can be found here: https://www.pugetsound.edu/stories/university-puget-sound-celebrates-major-fundraising-milestones-2022-23 CorenG (talk) 00:01, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update Endowment for 2023
Talk:George Copos

message: His name is really Gheorghe Copos.
Bill Gates' name is really "William Henry Gates III" and Bill Clinton's name is really "William Jefferson Clinton". In Wikipedia we use the most common name and for Copos that is by far "George Copos". bogdan 14:47, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I really doubt somebody can take it seriously. I can't wait for the anonymous editor to come back in a week.--Luci_Sandor (talk, contribs)   23:28, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Resignation
Talk:Yomiuri Shimbun

message: Which format does the print edition use? Tabloid, broadsheet, or something else? —Charles P._(Mirv) 01:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Format

message: I am tracing the source of this article on AsiaOne. I am wondering, is this the original web source, or does anyone know if it is possible to find this article on the Daily Yomiuri originally? Also it mentions 'ANN' which I don't know what that is. The only one I'm aware of is AnimeNewsNetwork but I have a hunch it means something different. Tyciol (talk) 20:00, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Daily Yomiuri doesn't keep an archive of past articles (unless they changed things recently). Articles tend to disappear after a week or two. It's very frustrating. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:56, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourcing assistance

message: No mention in the article of any digital versions of the paper. Given it's 2013, and most newspapers have a digital presence in some form or other (e.g. Apple Newsstand, Kindle, et al), this should surely be explained here, especially given it's the largest circulated newspaper in the world! Jimthing (talk) 09:34, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital versions? 
Talk:National Italo-Romanian Cultural and Economic Movement

message: I propose a name change to a more correct National Italo-Romanian Fascist Movement" --Mihai -talk 05:40, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:National Romanian Fascio

message: Propose a name change either to a more correct National Romanian Fascia or to tha romanian name Fascia Na'ională Română --Mihai -talk 05:41, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: .
Talk:Peter Feaver

message: Does this article really need two pictures, especially when they're both so similar?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.250.217.144 (talk) 04:41, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: One was removed in the latest revision.  – S. Rich (talk) 05:58, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Pictures?

message: This article has been targeted for improvement by the Civil-military relations community.
Inbody (talk) 23:47, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Targeted for revision

message: To User:Rebrane: Why the revert? According to the N.Y. Times article Mr. Feaver is revealed as the author of the President's speech: "The role of Feaver in preparing the strategy document came to light through a quirk of technology...the plan posted on the White House Web site showed the document's originator, or 'author' in the software's designation, to be 'feaver-p.'" Ergo he's a presidental speech writer, no? Compare that to the last time he did any professorial work and I wonder why you are insisting on highlighting his relationship with Duke.
Ewlyahoocom 05:50, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The strategy document was not the speech, and neither the article nor Feaver's position in the NSC gives the indication that Feaver prepared the speech. The fact that he was involved in preparing the strategy document, of course, is a verifiable and valid fact. As for the Duke emphasis, that was in the article before I got to it, but if you look at Feaver's Duke faculty page it does list him as a chaired faculty member on leave until August 2006. I think it's correct to describe him as a Duke professor first and a Presidential advisor second. Eliot 13:25, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Other notes