Talk:U.S. Route 163

message: An anon editor (not me) added a Navajo  Nation Highway as a junction list, only to see it get reverted, re-added and re-re-verted in a 12 hour period. For the record the anon editor is right. See the 2nd photo on this page: http://www.geocities.com/usend6069/End163/end163.htm
I don't get it, this highway is on the Navajo Nation, a semi-autonomous nation within the states of AZ, UT, and NM. The Navajo Nation does have their own department of transportation and does both jointly maintain US and state highways that pass through their lands as well as have their own system of highways. Why is it inappropriate to mention them in a Wikipedia article? If nobody can explain this to me I think it should be re-added Davemeistermoab (talk) 17:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Route 591 doesn't appear to be a major road, and its inclusion wouldn't seem to help the reader. --NE2 18:24, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough, The highway shows up on both ADOT and NDOT's maps on their websites, but not by number, so I cede the point. ADOT's map: http://www.arizonaguide.com/interactivemap/default.asp NDOT's map: http://www.navajodot.org/content.asp?CustComKey=283301&CategoryKey=283302&pn=LinksInt&domname=navajodot.org Davemeistermoab (talk) 19:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure that these aren't maintained by the Bureau of Indian Affairs? They are marked as "BIA roads" on the map. --NE2 20:34, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I believe (not sure) that the BIA roads are the 4 digit ones. In either case, I'm sure at least some funding comes from the BIA regardless. I'm by no means an expert on Navajo tribal politics Davemeistermoab (talk) 21:49, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Including Navajo Nation Highways in the junctions list 

message: #Is it reasonably well written?
#:A. Prose quality:  
#:: 
#:B. MoS compliance: 
#:: 
#Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
#:A. References to sources:  
#:: 
#:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
#:: 
#:C. No original research: 
#:: 
#Is it broad in its coverage?
#:A. Major aspects:  
#:: 
#:B. Focused: 
#:: 
#Is it neutral?
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#Is it stable?
#: No edit wars, etc: 
#:: 
#Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
#:A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
#:: 
#:B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass or Fail: 
#:: 
The article is beautiful Holderca1,  I really feel that this meets all criteria. Good job man.Mitch32contribs 14:59, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I can't take all the credit though.  As you can see above, this was joint effort between myself and Dave.  --Holderca1 talk 17:53, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article review 

message: Polaron recently changes this article to reflect some supposed truncation by UDOT, but all the references still show the old length. Maybe this is correct, but it needs references. Will give a couple days to dig up the info before reverting. DeFaultRyan (talk) 21:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See this and this. The UDOT logs probably won't reflect the change until the time they usually update their logs (once a year perhaps?). --Polaron | Talk 21:47, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool, nice find. Only wished you had put that link in the article as a source. Thanks for finding that.Dave (talk) 04:59, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Truncation to Bluff? 

message: Recently an anonymous editor added the following:
Another proposal would have US 163 run along Arizona State Route 98, U.S. Route 89, U.S. Route 89A, Arizona State Route 389, State Route 59, and State Route 9 to I-15 north of St. George.
At a minimum this needs to be tweaked, as the rest of the paragraph is sourced via UDOT logs, and this proposal is not mentioned anywhere in the UDOT logs. So, as written this is misleading. However, the bigger question is, is this true? sources, anybody heard of this before? Dave (talk) 21:30, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK nobody's defending the addition. I'm Undoing it. Dave (talk) 18:04, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  recent addition by an anonymous editor 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on U.S. Route 163. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080625073807/http://tpd.az.gov/data/reports/2006SHSLog.pdf to http://tpd.az.gov/data/reports/2006SHSLog.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:39, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on U.S. Route 163. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.transportation.org/sites/route/docs/US%20Routes%20Application.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080711120003/http://le.utah.gov/~code/TITLE72/htm/72_04_012200.htm to http://le.utah.gov/~code/TITLE72/htm/72_04_012200.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:53, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Someone has removed Navajo Highway 42 from the junctions list (amazingly this was done several months ago and nobody apparently noticed) Checking the Navajo DOT's webpage, Highway 42 is still designated and mantained, see thsi 2012 map (the most recent they have available)  so I'll re-add it. Dave (talk) 16:00, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Navajo Highway 42