lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lloyd Humphreys

message: I have posted a bibliography of   Intelligence Citations for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in those issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research and to suggest new sources to me by comments on that page. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 21:04, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Intelligence Citations Bibliography for Articles Related to IQ Testing
Talk:Julian Burnside

message: Reference for work on philology? Claire (talk) 19:14, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philology 
Talk:John E. Hunter

message: The paragraph mentioning that Hunter signed the "Mainstream Science on Intelligence" editorial was boilerplate added to the biographies of most signers back in 2006. It has been edited in various ways at various times in the biographies in which it was inserted. The edit here is good and appropriate to the subject of this article. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 12:56, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good edit on the Gottfredson editorial--thanks.
Talk:Seymour Itzkoff

message: You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of  Intelligence Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in these issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by  suggesting new sources through comments on that page. It will be extremely helpful for articles on human intelligence to edit them according to the  Wikipedia standards for reliable sources for medicine-related articles, as it is important to get these issues as well verified as possible. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 21:06, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Referring to new sources would probably help this article improve a lot. Dig in and enjoy. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 02:38, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intelligence Citations Bibliography for Articles Related to IQ Testing
Talk:Douglas N. Jackson

message: You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of  Intelligence Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in these issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by  suggesting new sources through comments on that page. It will be extremely helpful for articles on human intelligence to edit them according to the  Wikipedia standards for reliable sources for medicine-related articles, as it is important to get these issues as well verified as possible. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 14:42, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intelligence Citations Bibliography for Articles Related to Human Intelligence 
Talk:Julian Cheung

message: So what is his birth name? Julian or Chilam?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.176.209.99 (talk) 00:13, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Julian is his real English name. Chilam is just a nickname, also his chinese name directly translated. Dengero (talk) 10:47, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Julian Dicks

message: There seems to be some issue with when he left Wivenhoe. The BBC (a reputable source) says 9 June. If another good source is available showing another date please use it!--Egghead06 (talk) 07:16, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Club News | Mon 8th Jun 09  Posted by Web Master  By mutual consent Wivenhoe Town Football Club and Julian Dicks have been forced to part ways." (http://www.pitchero.com/clubs/wivenhoetownfc/?section=clubnews): he had gone by Monday 8th, but we don't know exactly when he went.  His main home is still in Spain, so it may be that most of the dealings since the end of the season have been conducted by phone or e-mail, so it is pointless to speculate as to when he last set foot in Broad Lane (the theatre of somnambulism).  Nor is it particularly important for an encyclopaedia to record the exact date of a change: in a few years time, all that will be relevant is the fact that he left this role in the 2009 close season.  The BBC is usually a reliable source, but my guess is that they do not put their chief reporters into stories dealing with 9th level clubs, and nor does the web editor insist on additional scrutiny of the facts.  Kevin McE (talk) 15:56, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wivenhoe
Talk:Julian Glover

message: Minor point. JG was in Isaac Asimov's Foundation Trilogy. Misleadingly this is mentioned in the Film section when the BBC adaptation was for Radio and not Film.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.137.243.7 (talk) 11:36, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: The Foundation Trilogy

message: Julian Glover had an important role in Cover Her Face on ITV in 1985 which is not recorded in his list of TV appearances. He played Felix Hurst in five of the six programmes. Perhaps someone could edit the grid to that effect.
<ref>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0204222/?ref_=nm_flmg_act_82<ref>
Dantes Warden (talk) 10:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover Her Face 

message: Should By the Sword Divided not be in the TV section rather than the film section? Dunarc (talk) 20:18, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It definitely should! JezGrove (talk) 23:18, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I have gone ahead and changed it - I was fairly sure there was not a film version.  Dunarc (talk) 23:47, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmography section
Talk:Vasik Rajlich

message: The notion of Rybka (which I proudly owns) being the best computer-chess program is a disputed one. This is probably what I would think myself, but there are people who do not believe so, and we have to do them justice, and state that 'Rybka is one of the strongest publically available chess programs'. Rybka is too new (one year in August 2006) in the computer chess scene to state that it is the best program. The notion of a program being good at chess is very relative. Anand for example prefers Hiarcs over Rybka for his analysis of the game, because Hiarcs move are more natural than those produced by Rybka. Strength may be loosely relative to 'goodness' or 'soundness' of the moves, I may agree on that. But than, to prove that Rybka is the best chess playing program, it would have to play in tournaments where top human and computer programs are involved, and consistently perform better than the other programs, or at least get a higher ELO. It would only be in this case that one could say that 'Rybka is the best computer program' (as we say now that Topalov is rated as the best chess player on Earth, in August 2006). Strong statements as these should only be written in Wikipedia when the claim cannot be contested. Which is not the case (yet!). Hope this helps to explain why I think it's best to maintain the sentence that says that Rybka is one of the best computer chess programs.
:Rybka is THE STRONGEST computer chess program in the world:
:http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=1376
::Actually Houdini is significantly stronger.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.163.255.2 (talk) 17:29, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: And there's no disagreement about it: . GregorB 15:03, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: old talk

message: About that bust to the King's gambit, I'm pretty sure it's just one of chessbase's April fool's day pranks. As a chess player and a computer expert, I have to tell you that the technology to carry out that kind of computation does not exist.
In particular, note that Rajlich claims to have used a "non-deterministic Turing machine" in calculations. Such a machine is a theoretical mathematical model; It could indeed solve chess in the blink of an eye, but it can't be constructed in the physical universe. 79.179.30.129 (talk) 17:43, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  King's Gambit busted
Talk:Han Fu (warlord)

message: Sorry to pick this guy out of a line up, but wasn't he one of Yuan Shao's clients as well as his high ranking offical. It just seems so odd to me that he would take this guy's territory just to boost his military might.--Zhang Liao 19:14, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because they are two different people that sounds the same. 韓馥 and 韓福. _dk 15:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: An Unfitting End
Talk:Julian Holloway

message: According to his IMDB entry, plus the Wikipedia articles on Tessa and Sophie Dahl, he was not married to Tessa.  I'm therefore removing the claim that Roald Dahl was his father-in-law.  Rojomoke (talk) 12:35, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Married to Dahl 

message: I added an image to this article which did not have one. The image was already in use on Wikipedia and currently appears on two other pages. User:Cassianto removed it as a "problematic image"; what is the problem? --Nedrutland (talk) 11:49, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: , firstly, please don't be disruptive by conducting discussions in edit summaries. Please discuss things on the talk page, per WP:BRD. Secondly, see this from when the image appeared at FAC and was subsequently removed on problematic licensing grounds. CassiantoTalk 11:52, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  How about you assume good faith rather than accuse me of being disruptive? I put a relevant image onto a page that lacked one. Was I supposed to be aware of a discussion about the image from 2011? You described it as "problematic" but clearly not so problematic as requiring removal from other pages at that time. Only now have you removed it. Nedrutland (talk) 16:25, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Firstly, see WP:REVTALK for an explaination as to why you were being disruptive; conducting a discussion in edit summaries is warring and that, in itself, is disruptive. Secondly, if  have followed the WP:BRD process, you'd have found the fact that this had been discussed in 2011.  You didn't, hence why we're here now. CassiantoTalk 18:56, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Since all the people in the photo are dead, it can be added as a fair use image to this article (as soon as it is removed from Commons and given an appropriate fair use summary and license), even though it cannot be added to Stanley's article. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:29, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know what their deaths have to do with this, but I should point out that Julian is very much alive and kicking. Anyway, I'm sure there are better, more up to date images out there we could use of Julian, rather than one that was taken 54 years ago with his parents. CassiantoTalk 19:52, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah.  If Julian is alive, then we cannot use it.  Fair use images must generally include only deceased people, under NFCC#1, because a free photograph can still be taken of a living person. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:59, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Even more reason why this should not be used.  , I hope you can understand this now. CassiantoTalk 20:03, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:Julian Joachim

message: Is "Jostin" really his middle name?  (I ask because the ip address that inserted that piece of information has a history of writing nonsense.) Skwush 20:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle name 

message: yes julian was playing start to finnish at the moat ground,gresley fc for away team hinckley fc not hinckley united. They are currently bottom of the east midlands counties football league four leagues below hinckley united and yes they lost to a 93rd minute penalty.only goal of the match.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.138.133 (talk) 20:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  julian jochim played today 6-11-10 
Talk:Julian Lewis

message: A couple of things strike me about this article and it's layout:
* No see also box. Links could include the constituence, party, positions he held or notable debates.
* No picture. This needs sorting ASAP. 
* Don't have external links (His own site, MI5 etc) in the text itself as the links can suffer from link rot. Give full citations instead. 
* References need to be included in greater number and from more sources. The external links are good starting places. Another site I would reccomend is the BBC Democracy Live website, which contains videos of debates, or the BBC Election 2010 website.
Hope this can improve things somewhat. Rafmarham (talk) 23:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Layout improvements
Talk:Julian Marley

message: There are a lot of unsourced claims, and it feels more like a hagiography than a wikipedia artile.  For example "Julian Marley is ranked higher in the conscious movement of music than majority of the reggae artists recognised today"
62.2.246.66 (talk) 12:17, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this neutral?
Talk:Julian Mitchell

message: How did Julian Mitchell come to write Another Country (play)?  Saying that he wrote only the screen play for the movie is in contradiction to the main page for that play, which claims he wrote the original play, but I cannot (on a quick Google) find any more information about the play except it did indeed run two years before the movie was made.--Jaibe 10:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Julian Opie

message: needs photos and when she was born and some of her creations and quotes. (seriously?) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.110.192.37 (talk) 16:42, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The above template already includes a request that a photo of him be added. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 20:36, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: With a mistake like that, We *really* need a picture. 213.106.107.251 (talk) 19:33, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: He has some self-portraits that would work as a photo for the article but I can't upload them as I don't have the copyrights. Josephinabloggs 19 (talk) 16:10, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs photo

message: Various edits of the Julian Opie page have been undone or rolled back. A conflict of interest has been cited. In this article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Reliable_sources) it states the following
Living persons may publish material about themselves, such as through press releases or personal websites. Such material may be used as a source only if:
it is not unduly self-serving;
it does not involve claims about third parties;
it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the subject;
there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity;
the article is not based primarily on such sources.
The Julian Opie page could contain more relevant and accurate information. This could be done without being self serving. Julian Opie's studio and staff can more reliably and accurately provide this information than anyone else, plus we can provide up to date images. We will be able to provide information that is well cited and tallies with a number of private and public institutions that show his work.
Please let me know what you think and help us to maintain this page to the best possible extent.
JulianOpieStudio 16:40, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing by Julian Opie himself and employees
Talk:Julian Ovenden

message: I have seen 5 May 1976 and 6 May 1976 from a general web search on Ovenden's DOB, but I am not certain which is correct.  If anyone can settle it, please do.  Thanks, DJRafe (talk) 18:56, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: DOB uncertainty

message: Entry needs updating to indicate his role in the tv series ‘Avenue Five’ 71.17.39.99 (talk) 19:00, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current role
Talk:McBurney School

message: I've created this page on Aug 14, 2006 and would welcome edits from others who attended McBurney - especially before the 1960s or when it became co-ed or when it moved from W. 63rd St.  I've also read that Ted Koppel and Adam Horovitz of the Beastie Boys are alumni of McBurney, but only had one web source and didn't want to include them in the article without some confirmation.Revmoran 19:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Effort, Edits Welcome 

message: I received a note from a member of the class of 1967 and include some of the information below - maybe someone could add their own recollections and we could update the article Revmoran 20:56, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes from the Class of 1967 

message: This school had a number of Jewish students in the mid-twentieth century, in decades when many elite private schools excluded Jews.  Perhaps the school's non-discrimination policy can be researched into and included.Gogue2 (talk) 14:08, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-discrimination policy?
Talk:Julian Rhind-Tutt

message: This reads more like a pitch for more roles or a theatre programme note. --83.221.82.109 06:13, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this really an encylopedia article?
Talk:Julian C. Richards

message: The link to his personal website does not link to it. They link to a page in Chinese or a Far East language I think it's been hacked? andy  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.144.11 (talk) 19:25, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Is Julian married?01:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Private life 
Talk:Julian Richer

message: You have removed external links for the charities that Julian has set up and maintains, which are referenced and cited in the article. I am confused as to why and would want these reinstated, as they have been included on this entry for years and were just added to. 88.151.154.237 (talk) 12:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: There were eight external links. Clearly too many. Readers can always use a search engine to find these websites. Please read WP:LINKFARM and Wikipedia:External links. Edwardx (talk) 13:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I have read the article you linked. There is no specification of how many links are 'clearly too many' only that they should not overwhelm the contents of the article. Please can you direct me to a resource that states that 8 links is too many, as all the links are discussed in the article? It seems very arbitrary, when Terrence Conran's article has 10 external links, for example. 77.103.46.52 (talk) 13:00, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I am only seeing nine at Terence Conran. Also too many, but he is a more notable person than Richer, and was active in several fields. Edwardx (talk) 20:28, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links -too many?
Talk:Julian Savulescu

message: Ethics is naturally a controversial subect.  However, it seems like the author of this article has picked the parts of Savulescu's publications that would be most "unacceptable" to some religious views.  I wonder if someone with more knowledge can balance it out a bit? Duane Johnson (talk) 15:47, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed commentary sourced to a blog posting on Huffington Post; The edits were added by a blocked sockpuppet promoting links to Jacob M. Appel and his work. There's no indication Appel's views have been significantly reported on or any independent proof that Appel is a "leading bioethicist". Please see Talk:Jacob M. Appel for discussions on spamming and socking. Flowanda | Talk 07:10, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed non-notable commentary -- October 2010 
Talk:Julian Schnabel

message: Considered heroic, Schanbel is infamous for having a charismatic personality.
I changed "infamous" to "known", because I don't think people are famous or infamous for having that trait.  They are famous for something else, like their talent, leadership ability, religious activity; their charisma is a sort of inherent magnetic quality that a lot of people might notice, but their main claim to fame is elsewhere.  Wikipedia has an article on charisma. "Infamous" doesn't seem to be exactly the word required here.  
Cunningpal 21:52, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Charisma

message: He's infamous for wearing pajamas in public.  I think that should be mentioned.  Spot (talk) 13:22, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Pajamas

message: The article as it currently stands reads awfully enthusiastically for neutral POV informational material.  I find Schnabel's work really engaging too, but. . . this feels more like a glowing review than an encyclopedia article right now.  Anyone else think it should be tagged, or edited significantly to change its tone? PoetrixViridis 13:52, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV?

message: Much of the article looks as if it were written by a Schnabel publicist!  To put Schnabel in the top 10,000 painters living right now in America is perhaps closer to the truth.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhapsodelectro (talk • contribs) 01:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I agree with above criticism-needs objective revision badly  

message: The opening paragraph is in dire need of reworking so that it reflects Schnabel's non-film visual art more prominently, as he is first and foremost that and not a director. Also, Javier Bardem was already established outside of the US - Before Night Falls simply brought him to American audiences. SteveCoppock (talk) 16:22, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rework opening graph
Talk:Juliana Martins

message: The link to Portuguese wikipedia is wrong. It goes to the actress born in 1974. 82.141.117.146 (talk) 23:44, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled