lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bamboo Mañalac

message: Bamboo's family is really messed up. 
I should know since i'm his cousin. His mom is my dad's sister. He is not muslim and I know.
I see him almost every time I go to my other cousin's house. He is a Catholic and so is my family. I hope the person who made this will make this change.--Joncrimson 07:48, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bamboo's real family 

message: I find the Philippine Media's penchant for naming someone Prince/Princess/Queen/King of [something] very off putting.  It cries out for validation.  If you are good, your work will be recognize and no need for such, frankly speaking, cheesy.
Who dubbed him as such?  
Who is the King of Rock then?   Is Bamboo next in line or are there other member of Royal Family of Philippine Rock and Roll?
See what I mean?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.54.172.66 (talk) 21:39, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prince of Rock 

message: Bamboo grew up in San Mateo, California. 
He is presently married to her second wife, Bambi S. Manalac. He is in good terms with her first wife, Maureen 
Mababangloob, with which he has two kids.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bambi sm (talk • contribs) 22:41, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal Life
Talk:Cost–utility analysis

message: Wikified as part of the wikification drive.  KarenAnn 14:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Chan Lai So Chun Memorial School

message: Victuallers 17:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ball's Pyramid

message: Why is this the 2nd top read page today? I can find no significant recent news when searching the brand nor find any recent update here to suggest why. Thanks! 2600:8805:9100:418:49E0:FD75:F92C:4BB4 (talk) 17:51, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top Read? 

message: Can it really be described as a stack as it's not next to a coastline?--JBellis 14:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've reverted what appears to be repeated creationist vandalism by one user. 
JGabbard felt that the approximately several-million-years age of Balls Pyramid was not only unsourced but "unprovable", and after an anonIP contributor provided a highly suitable source (a vetted supplement to a published textbook, accompanied by scholarly citations and explicitly stating "Potassium-argon dating indicates [Balls Pyramid] is similar, or slightly younger in age, than [nearby mountains] which have been potassium-argon dated to 6.4 Ma.", by a coastal geomorphologist with specific expertise regarding the Australian coast and who holds a top-level academic position), JGabbard claimed that this source contained "no support" for the article's statement that BP "formed about 6.4 million years ago" and instead altered the lead to say "Ball's Pyramid is an erosional remnant of unknown age". JGabbard's page proclaims both his general adherence to Seventh Day Adventism (a young-earth creationist denomination of the Christian religion) and specifically his associated belief in intelligent-design creationism, as well as his non-inclusive attitude (via the banner that he "believes atheism is harmful to society"). 
I could easily give more sources on how we know the age of Balls Pyramid. Cesiumfrog (talk) 04:13, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age 

message: How about some semi-protection to prevent vandalism like the passage above me where it stated where it was and how it was made. 24.2.133.105 (talk) 21:50, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-Protection?  
Talk:Ernst Barkmann

message: Please see Zaloga: Armored Champion. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:27, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I restored the previous version. I'm open to adjusting if needed. Let's discuss here first. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:18, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legend of "Barkmann's corner"
Talk:Swiss roll

message: It was always a Swiss roll in my days.  When did it become swiss roll? -- Smjg 13:14, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did it lose its cap? 

message: ...push him down a mountain.  Oh yes folks, I'm here all night.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Traveller palm (talk • contribs) 19:11, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the easiest way to make a Swiss roll? 

message: The intro states it is of central european origin, but the body of the article ignores central europe completely and seems to say it came from Hong Kong via. the U.K.  --75.205.224.96 (talk) 14:38, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin

message: I did not find anything about Matchlock being japanese for swiss roll. Maybe someone confused
抹茶ロールケーキ (Matcha Roll Cake, green tea-flavored swiss role) with マッチロック (Matchlock)? Irrogalp (talk) 11:52, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese: Matchlock? 

message: This sentence makes no sense:
:The origins of the term "Swiss" roll are unclear and the cake originated in Central Europe and not Switzerland.
since Switzerland is in Central Europe. Harry the Dog WOOF 19:41, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin 

message: The beginning of this article says that the cake originated in Central Europe, probably in Austria or Hungary, but the article List of cakes says that the cake originated in the United Kingdom. Which is correct? ACEOREVIVED (talk) 16:56, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: This contradicts the List of Cakes article

message: I have removed the nonsense that in Britain, the chocolate Swiss roll is known as chocolate log. The term "chocolate Swiss roll" in Britain is merely used to denote a brown sponge with chocolate flavouring which will NOT  - as in the case of chocolate log  - be covered with chocolate on the outside. Any one who wants evidence of this need only look in the cake section of a supermarket and look at where Swiss rolls are on sale. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 20:26, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Chocolate Swiss roll is NOT chocolate log

message: The blurb at the top of this article says this article is about the "pastry". It should say "cake"  - as these cakes do not have pastry in them. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 21:46, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Why the introduction needs changing
Talk:St Stephen's College (Hong Kong)

message: Looking at the wiki grades, this article so far would be a B-. There may be some problems with non-neutral point of view and I question whether your school's 'English speaking days' are of sufficent importance to be recorded in an encyclopedia.
As English orientated schools are popular in Hong Kong, I think it is a way for them to advertise the school, like a marketing strategy.  They should provide a bit more details on that for how it is aiding students to learn. 110.33.121.33 (talk) 17:40, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki grades

message: Thanks for alerting me to the fact that someone with the same IP address as me has been vandalising your page. This is a shared IP as I'm using a school computer with a Hutchison account - so the vandal isn't me. Is it possible that one of your students could be accessing wikipedia through the same IP? 
Davidjohncock 03:03, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism
Talk:Ying Wa Girls' School

message: Guessed at mid but really need alumni list and refs are required to make a "b" rating. Avoid being an advert. Welcome. Victuallers 15:09, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Classification

message: Why does an English encyclopaedia have lyrics in Chinese? Avalon 07:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: School song
Talk:Tordenskjold-class coastal defence ship

message: The introduction here makes reference to the events of 1905. What happened in 1905? LordAmeth 21:24, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was wikilinked, but I wrote a short sentence to clarefy. WegianWarrior 06:04, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 1905?
Talk:Castle-class corvette

message: I have added the names of builders and construction dates for the majority of these vessels. I have also changed the pennant numbers for those vessels built in the UK and transferred to the Royal Canadian Navy, as they were referenced under their RN names but their RCN pennant numbers! Please note that all pennant numbers were changed along with their names when the vessels were transferred to the RCN. Rif Winfield (talk) 05:30, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of vessels 

message: I can't be sure so haven't edited, but if this ship was intended to be named after the place in Shropshire, then it should be Bridgnorth, without an E. Loganberry (Talk) 15:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bridgenorth Castle"? 

message: Why clutter up the article with stuff that never existed ? Just state nn were ordered but cancelled and leave it at that. Rcbutcher (talk) 00:32, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: What's the use of long list of individual cancelled ship details ?

message: I heard that Castle class ships had two 40 mm Bofors guns on a bridge above the engine room instead of two twin 20 mm Oerlikons, as you can see on a drawing at the internet. Is it true that they were equipped with such guns?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.184.245.140 (talk) 10:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armament
Talk:River-class frigate

message: The separation into Group 1 and Group 2 does not match the actual orders, which were as follows:
The 1940 Programme comprised 27 River class frigates built in the UK. These were ordered between February and July 1941, and comprised - Balinderry, Bann, Chelmer, Dart, Derg, Ettrick, Exe, Itchen, Jed, Kale, Lagan, Mourne, Moyola, Ness, Nith, Ribble (i), Rother, Spey, Strule, Swale, Tay, Test, Teviot, Trent, Tweed, Waveney and Wear.
The 1941 Programme comprised 19 River class frigates built in the UK. These were ordered between September 1941 and May 1942, and comprised - Aire, Braid, Cam, Deveron, Dovey, Fal, Frome, Helford, Helmsdale, Meon, Nene, Plym, Tavy, Tees, Torridge, Towy, Usk, Windrush and Wye. In addition 8 ships were built in Canada for the Royal Navy - Barle, Cuckmere, Evenlode, Findhorn, Inver, Lossie, Parret and Shiel.
The 1942 Programme comprised 11 River class frigates built in the UK. These were ordered between July and December 1942, and comprised - Annan, Avon, Awe, Duddon (renamed Ribble (ii)), Halladale, Lochy, Monnow, Nadder, Odzani, Taff and Teme.
Rif Winfield 16:03, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grouping by Programme Year 

message: I'd like to suggest that the list of ships in the class be split off into a separate List of River class frigates. At the moment, this article is quite large, but there is little information of the class as a whole because the article is dominated by data on individual ships. Splitting the list off would make the article more manageable, and likely prompt the addition and development of class-overview content. -- saberwyn 01:00, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it's a bit confusing as it is. Separate sections on the various builds would be useful, with summary lists of the ships in each group (as Rif has done, above). Then we could spread the infoboxes on the British, Canadian and Australian builds out a bit. Xyl 54 (talk) 23:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Is anyone going to carry out the split? Op47 (talk) 16:13, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done now. -- saberwyn 02:45, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thankyou. Op47 (talk) 17:51, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split the list off
Talk:Wah Yan College, Hong Kong

message: The name "Qiu Wity" is so weird.
邱木城's English name is YAU MOK SHING in Wah Yan Past Student Association's database or Yow Mok-shing in Legislative council's document.His Christian name should be Stephen as shown in Vocational Training Council's and Wah Yan SDP Project donors's homepages.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zuagi (talk • contribs) 14:25, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does 邱木城's English Name is Qiu Wity ? 
Talk:Cheung Chuk Shan College

message: Could be a B with more refs. Could be mid importance if alumni listed Victuallers 23:27, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:David Gasman

message: Were some of David's stage performances musicals? Angie Y. 03:31, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: David's stage performances - musicals?

message: Bulletpoint formatting is acceptable format in articles now?! 121.214.67.243 (talk) 04:09, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Bulletpoint formatting?
Talk:Kobben-class submarine

message: A Kobben-class sub appears in the Tom Clancy novel, Red Storm Rising - with surprising success. 50.111.8.86 (talk) 23:04, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  in fiction
Talk:DarkBASIC

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was no consensus.--Jorfer 20:57, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: In what way does does the current version of the article or section reads like an advertisement? - DNewhall 16:52, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just a brief introductory paragraph, followed by a long list of bulleted features. The bullets have nearly no descriptive information. It's like what one would read on the back of a software box, or in a product flyer. -- Mikeblas 18:17, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I've cut down the bullet list and removed the ad tag. Feel free to add it back if it still needs more work 80.47.1.116 01:24, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have, indeed, replaced the advert tag. There's essentially no content here; just a list of bullets that make it look like a product brochure. -- Mikeblas 06:30, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Reading the advertisement link in the template I don't see how it applies here. The article appears unbiased and objective and DarkBASIC is fairly well known in gamedev circles. It may be a pretty poor article but doesn't appear to fall foul of wikipedia advertising policy. Axrtest 21:29, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

text: In my opinion, it reads exactly like an advertisement, since it includes only a list of positive, terse, vauge statements. This is exactly how a marketing flyer is written, or copy for the box itself might be formatted. As such, I've replaced the tag. Please don't remove it unitl the article is improved. Thanks! -- Mikeblas 19:14, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Advert?

message: *  Interview with Lee Bamber on his past leading up to writing DarkBASIC. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Axrtest (talk • contribs) 15:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Useful links

message: I've reverted an addition that was unreferenced and unsummarized. There's really no point in making a very poor article even worse. -- Mikeblas 00:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert 

message: This page links to EAX, which is a disambiguation page. To what was the link meant to refer? -- Mikeblas 21:51, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, thanks! -- Mikeblas 17:41, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  EAX? 

message: The proposed merger (see above) has been on this talk page for ... nearly a year now. Can something be done? Either action took, the tags should be removed and the discussion should be archived. --SteelersFan UK06 02:56, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Above Merger 

message: As a user of DarkBASIC I plan to go through and re-write this article to be more consistant and worthwhile to the Wikipedia. Should have something up by the end of the week. Lucky Foot (talk) 05:21, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total Re-Write
Talk:Nasty-type patrol boat

message: There is no such praefix.--84.129.185.66 (talk) 22:42, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GS

message: There are a couple of things wrong with this article as it stands.</br>
Firstly, it is titled “Tjeld class patrol boat”, but contains information on all the Nasty type boats built by Westermoen for different navies, without acknowledging the differences between them. The title Tjeld class should only really apply to the boats of the Norwegian navy.</br>
Secondly, what is here is unreferenced, and much of it is at odds with the information contained in a reliable source like Conway.</br>
So I intend moving this page to the title “Nasty-type patrol boat”, to reflect its scope, and to re-write what is here to include a summary and main article link for each group of boats,  and to trim down the unsourced material. I also intend to remove the current redlinks to the various boats; as I understand it WP:SHIPS doesn't regard boats under 100ft length or 100tons displacement as inherently notable, so none of them (except the prototype) would be getting their own article any time soon. I trust everyone is OK with that. Xyl 54 (talk) 12:58, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write 
Talk:Ormrinn langi

message: " Extrapolating from archeological evidence (e.g. the Gokstad ship), this would make Ormen Lange nearly 45 meters long." Except that we have newer and better evidence than Gokstad. It should be altered to reflect Roskilde 7, discovered in 1997: 36 rooms, length approx. 35 meters. Solicitr 13:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is more to the meaning of the name than just The Long serpent. 
First the ship itself is identified/personified as being a worm, by referring to it as such. Secondly that worm is called Lange, meaning "The Long One". 
Worm is a better translation than serpent for several reasons. Worms are in integral part of Norse mythology. A quick glimpse on the Ragnarok myth would do it. Another reason is that the word serpent has certain suggestions in Anglo Saxon culture - and especially in Christianity -, that is not present in Norse culture. In the Nordic languages a serpent is called a slange nowadays to separate them from worms specifically. The Old Norse word Orm (or Ormr) could be used to describe other creatures than just worms - also people at times -, usually in a negative way, referring to the mythical Miðgarðsormr.
In an effort to sum this up, the name Ormen Lange can be translated as:
* The worm Lange
* The worm "The Long One"
It is not pretty, but here I have focussed on the meaning. 
RhinoMind (talk) 02:24, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: PS I notice that worms in the Norse mythologies, are often referred to as serpents here on Wikipedia (fx the Midgard Serpent). I believe it must be due to some thoughtlessness in translation, as I have explained the differences between the two above. Must take it up somewhere. RhinoMind (talk) 02:28, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved to Ormrinn langi. WP:BARTENDER. (closed by non-admin page mover) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 02:58, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ormen Lange (longship) →  – Consistency with other pages - we typically use Old Norse over Norweigian or other modern North Germanic languages when referring to something from a time period in which Old Norse was spoken. This further would get around the disambiguation issue. Ingwina (talk) 19:03, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 May 2023
Talk:Pieris (butterfly)

message: this article:
*  (2005). Extreme ultraviolet sexual dimorphism in jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 89: 397-406. 
quoted in references it's not related to Pieris !! --Esculapio 14:14, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Chan Sui Ki (La Salle) College

message: Victuallers 17:17, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Maryknoll Convent School

message: I went to MCS (1984) and am very proud of it.  But "prestigious" is a bit POV, isn't it? tess 20:27, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prestigious

message: I think the History part of the article is not very well formed and it isfar too long. Formatting it in a different way would make it much more readable. There is that writing about the crest too: because you put it in the infobox it is really fragmented. It should be made into a section before or after History. After all both style and length of the writing suggests this implementation. 89.134.217.234 (talk) 18:03, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Outlook?

message: re:The Ghost Pine Controversy: tons of detail with one incomplete and unconfirmable cite.  The story is not only pitched against the school over a tree, but it is such a large section against the total article that it weighs down the whole thing. EBY (talk) 15:41, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "Tree" Section and POV
Talk:Kvarven Fort

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:35, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: I added to the World War II section, including mention of torpedo battery at Kvarven Fort, and contrast vs. successful torpedoing by Oscarsborg Fortress torpedo battery.  This Kvarven Fort article needs to include some comment on why its torpedo battery wasn't used, or wasn't successful.  From what I gather, the Germans presumably knew of this torpedo battery and perhaps could have avoided its threat, by staying out of torpedo range which may be shorter than artillery range, but that is speculation and I don't know.  Some specific info here is needed! --doncram 22:32, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  torpedo battery info needed
Talk:Wa Ying College

message: This is a great start on your school article. Further advice is available at the schools project.
#Add some topics (like history?) - done
#Keep adding references ???
#Add pictures ????
#Ask for an assessment at the schools project. When u r ready
:Good luck and welcome Victuallers 20:07, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess
Talk:Queen Elizabeth School, Hong Kong

message: Hello all, and thank you for contributing to this school site. I'm part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment team, and I'm reviewing this page. I'm currently giving it a grade of Start on the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale and an importance of Mid on this importance scale.
My reasoning is as follows: Lists should be made into tables/paragraphs. Much of this information is only of local interest. Adam McCormick 04:21, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment|Assessment]] as of March 2007 

message: Please note that those Who's Who promoted by Marquis are not considered reliable & meaningful. Forbes Magazine labeled it "Hall of Lame". See this critigue of Who's Who Section 4. 。The only reliable scientific referral in North America is American Men and Women of Science See Princeton referral Princeton University Library --QES girl (talk) 05:08, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Who's Who Embarrassment