lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:9/11 domestic complicity conspiracy theories

message: We have a growing 9/11 section in a conspiracy wiki for this where your information will be less likely to be edited out. We would be glad to have you come by and add it in. Conwiki 04:57, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: For disputed information showing US complicity in 9/11

message: I edited out the claim that the Vreeland note pointed to Osama bin Laden as the culprit for 9/11. Can anyone explain this claim.  It is not at all clear from reading the image of the note that this claim is accurate.--Cberlet 08:54, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cutline for Vreeland note

message: i need comments:
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/London bombing
--Striver 19:46, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  London 

message: Feel free to join, together we are not ridiculed and dismissed as easy.
:*Wikipedia:WikiProject Conspiracy: The World Conspiracy Guild
:*Wikipedia:WikiProject Conspiracy: The Septeber 11 2001 Conspiracy Guild
:*Wikipedia:WikiProject Conspiracy: The London bombing Conspiracy Guild
--Striver 20:59, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guild 

message: Could the following text:
Category:Protected redirects
...please be replaced with the following text:
...so that the redirect is is put into the category via a tranclusion in an Rcat template rather than a category transclusion? Thanks! Steel1943 (talk) 06:23, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --Redrose64 (talk) 09:25, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 19 September 2014
Talk:Bank of England

message: I noticed this fact isn't in the article, despite being able to find many sources for the claim. 110.174.171.123 (talk) 07:29, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it was a bit more complex than that, but you are right, the disastrous finances of the crown in the years leading to the creation of the BoE are not well summarized in the article. Currently it is simply like "The king wanted to build a fleet and needed to raise money", rather than "The king had been overspending dramatically and all attempts at refinancing had failed completely, leading to total lack of credibility". The role of goldsmiths, the invention of government bonds, the national lottery, and yes, tally sticks, should all be mentioned. The problem is that an accurate account of events would not sound very honorable, and someone might want to come in and tone it down. If you have good sources, please do try. Megustalastrufas (talk) 08:59, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Bank of England was apparently created in 1694 due to King William III defaulting on his Tally sticks?
Talk:Royal Society

message: The first UK-wide national Young Academy – a network of early career researchers and professionals – was launched in June 2022 and is being run under the auspices of the Royal Society. The initiative, as part of an interdisciplinary collaboration with the Academy of Medical Sciences, British Academy, Learned Society of Wales, Royal Academy of Engineering, Royal Irish Academy, Royal Society of Edinburgh, and the Royal Society, aspires to connect emerging leaders with different knowledge and expertise, and include their voices in local and global policy discussions. 194.81.217.65 (talk) 10:28, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the above information. Wikipedia relies on reliable, secondary sources to verify its information. Therefore, I will not be added this information at this time. If you would like this information to be added, please supply a source that talks about this (that is secondary and independent). Thanks, Z1720 (talk) 15:54, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK Young Academy 

message: You reverted my move of One flaw was that there was not enough space for the office staff, which was then approximately eighty. When, for example, the Society organised the British contribution to the International Geophysical Year in 1954, additional facilities had to be found for the staff outside Burlington House from the beginning of the "20th century" subtopic to the end of the "19th century" subtopic, presumably because of the year 1954. I object on two grounds:
*The statement is out of context and obviously a continuation of the last paragraph in the "19th century" subtopic. This is where it used to be.
*It's out of chronological order with the rest of the subtopic.
I'm taking the liberty of restructuring a bit. What do you think?
Also, the history tells about where the Society is housed, but not much about what it's done. That's too ambitious a project for me to tackle right now, but it needs doing. For example, it should tell what the RS actually contributed to the International Geophysical Year, not just that it had to find larger quarters. (That bit got left out in my attempt to improve the narrative's flow.) YoPienso (talk) 19:19, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine with that. As you first "reason" explains, you were splitting a topic. Johnbod (talk) 13:42, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Good! Happy editing. YoPienso (talk) 18:05, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Bladder cancer

message: doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30512-8 JFW | T@lk 08:27, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lancet seminar 

message: Which immune checkpoint inhibitors are FDA approved for the treatment any bladder cancer patients? urothelial carcinoma just mentions pembrolizumab. - Rod57 (talk) 20:58, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Have copied 2 lines from atezolizumab to urothelial carcinoma as a start. - Rod57 (talk) 21:08, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which immune checkpoint inhibitors are approved ? 

message: This page doesn't have a research section.  Is there an appropriate place to mention research advances?  The following review in the journal Nature would be useful to mention with regard to the role of galectins in bladder cancer: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41585-019-0183-5  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fpbear (talk • contribs) 03:22, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Research 

message: Can we move molecular classification to the end of the list. Risk stratification is more important clinically .--Astroketh (talk) 06:14, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure we can move it to the end of that section if you want. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:21, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Molecular classification 

message: I added three short segments to this page using information from Cochrane review studies.
- To the non-muscle invasive: added information about medications that are used to prevent recurrence of disease after surgery
- To metastatic disease: added information on pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy for treating advanced bladder cancer that has recurred
- To muscle-invasive disease: added information on the types of lymph node dissections that often accompany radical cystectomy and their impacts
--Gsom12812 (talk) 19:17, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cochrane review edits for bladder cancer treatment 

message: Bladder cancer can be diagnosticated through the levels of protein Mcm5 in the urine. That protein Is exclusively produced by cancer cells. The related test has a precision of 97%. (sources: Il Corriere della Sera, Il Messaggero). 151.38.2.171 (talk) 17:22, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagnosis through protein Mcm5 in the urine
Talk:Oil crisis

message: Removed references to oil being used to generate electricity.  Oil fired plants are a very minor source of electric power, with most plants being coal or gas fired.
: Well, if you use oil-powered trains to get your coal to the power station... (and oil-powered cars to get the workers to the coalpit etc etc) :) cferrero
::I think the commercial "knock-on" effects can more accurately be attributed to what are described as consumer effects, e.g. high petrol prices, which is significant for manufacturing, i.e. in shipping, etc. Graft 00:12 5 Jul 2003 (UTC)
I removed the link to the California_electricity_crisis, because as the discussion above demonstrates oil has very little to do with electric power. SimonP 04:04 5 Jul 2003 (UTC)
The link was there to highlight the energy crisis similarity (especially the supplier withdrawal and consumer price regulation, which both have in common), even if oil is not used to generate electricity, they do compete on things like home heating, and a rise in the price of  one is often correlated with a rise in the other dml
:: So we actually don't have an article about the oil crisis on it's own? You get redirected to energy crisis but that's not the same. Shouldn't there be an oil crisis on it's own? I got some nice information here:   Lantern
::I'm new to editing wikipedia, But i think "Oil crisis" should not be redirected to "Energy crisis". They're very different.  Could someone remove that redirect or propose a stub for oil crisis?  lennartvdm
:::I thought I did this... Redirecting to Hubbert peak theory, which I think is the most appropriate place. Graft 12:58, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Timeline of Afghan history

message: This is extremely difficult to navigate - can't we put some of these into fewer articles? Mark Richards 23:54, 13 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: four years on.. and I am doing this on a lazy easter saturday!! Jez t e C 08:54, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fragmented

message: ...that nothing happened in Afghanistan after October 2004? This is the problem with pet projects such as this that are solely the work of one person: once that person stops editing all coverage of the topic halts, leading to a level of intolerable inconsistency. Perhaps all the articles in the series since the US invasion need to be trimmed down to significant facts, making them maybe half a dozen articles in total. Every death of every soldier, every roadside bomb, etc are not notable. -R. fiend 14:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Did you know...?

message: There seemed to be many different articles pointing to timelines of Afghanistan. I have merged a lot of these into 2001 in Afghanistan / 2002 in Afghanistan / 2003 in Afghanistan / 2004 in Afghanistan / 2005 in Afghanistan / 2006 in Afghanistan / 2007 in Afghanistan / 2008 in Afghanistan / 2009 in Afghanistan Comments for particular years on each page please Jez t e C 08:52, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  timelines of Afghanistan 

message: The end of Monarchy in Afghanistan and the start of the Presidency of Daud, i.e. the 1973 coup, needs to be in this timeline.
Also to call Nadir Shah a reactionary in the timeline is emotional, not neutral.
--132.185.144.122 (talk) 18:23, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daoud becomes President 

message: Some useful information may be gleaned from this page on the timeline of Afghanistan going back into antiquity .
Template talk:History of Afghanistan .Intothefire (talk) 16:26, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Template talk:History of Afghanistan
Talk:Mandarin

message: I have removed the redirect from this talk page to Talk:Mandarin (linguistics) so that questions such as the one below may be asked about the disambiguation page, and other Mandarin topics not related to the lanuage. Flibirigit 19:47, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed redirect

message: I cannot find an article on Wikipedia for The Mandarin (restaurant). Does anyone know if one exists. Also, I cannot find it on the disambiguation page. Flibirigit 21:01, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Mandarin (restaurant) 

message: Is it sufficiently often misspelled without the first "n" to warrant a redirect?  How will people ever become aware they've misspelled it if they manage to link it to the right article anyway?  --  JackofOz (talk) 22:58, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why does the redirect from [[Madarin]] exist?

message: Is there an actual meaning to the word or is it just randomly tacked on as an identifier?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.10.222.30 (talk) 13:32, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does it mean? 

message: *I find it would be helpful for readers if the disambiguation page points out the relationships between the terms "Modern Standard Mandarin", "Mandarin" and "Standard Chinese", as these terms deserve to be mentioned on their own right and yet they could confusingly point to same thing.
*After reading MOS:ITAL#Emphasis, I think it is valid to emphasize the first two terms by italics on this circumstance. I also find WP:MOSDAB have specific limitations on italicization on introductory lines and links, which may not apply to this circumstance.
* Thanks and Happy Friday. Lovewhatyoudo (talk) 10:00, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it is very confusing to search for Mandarin and discover that China's official language has practically no native speakers. More explanation  needed for the novice.169.231.23.59 (talk) 01:39, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Italics

message: I came here looking for the article about the article about the bureaucratic office by this name, & failed to find it buried near the bottom. (I managed to find it linked in the article about the language.) Since it is the original meaning of this word, & from whence all these other terms are known, wouldn't it be more useful to the reader to put this link at the top? -- llywrch (talk) 20:17, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It used to be that way.  There also too many MOS:DABNOENTRYs, e.g. the Clothing section, making it harder to find the right "Mandarin".  Kanguole 21:20, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A matter of emphasis
Talk:Grammy Hall of Fame

message: I suggest renaming this to , as that is what it is called by The Recording Academy and by the vast majority of sources. Any objections? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:37, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The original title was Grammy Hall of Fame, and a number of links either directly use Grammy Hall of Fame or pipe it (Grammy Hall of Fame). I'll make the move. SilkTork ✔Tea time 08:48, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: From the looks of this "article" I gather this Hall Of Fame has no address where one can visit.  That's usually what a HALL of Fame is.  It should be noted to people that they cannot visit this "Hall" and that it's actually a sham.  Unless there actually is a physical location?  If so, the article doesn't say.  Huh. 146.168.57.244 (talk) 21:16, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  OBVIOUS Suggestion 

message: There are no sources for any of the inductees after 2021. The only citation was for a Kate Bush single and that has no statement saying that it was inducted. There was a article on the site for inductees for 2021 but no article for 2022 & 2023. Hope you either delete the inductees after 2021 or find actual sources. Lips6573 (talk) 21:00, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No citations for inductees after 2021.
Talk:String

message: The "Community Radio" list of definitions are all redlinks. Shall we delete that from the article? -- Mikeblas 17:32, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If nobody objects, I'll drop this link and perform the merge next weekend. -- Mikeblas 19:21, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Community Radio 

message: I've removed a few red links while performing the merge, though I've left some in the expectation they might be common or notable enough usage to anticipate an article. I noted that this isn't a very typical layout for a disambiguation page, so if anyone wants to perform more cleanup, fix up the layout, or so on, please do feel encouraged to do so. -- Mikeblas 13:02, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've taken care of a lot of it, I removed all the extraneous links, removed the piping, fixed all the headers, and reordered them (see MoS:DP).  The only thing I wasn't sure about was removing the dictionary definition - I'm all for taking it out, because there is already the link to Wiktionary (and Wikipedia is not a dictionary anyway) but there has always been some discrepancy about it. -- Natalya 18:39, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I forgot to thank you: Thank you! -- Mikeblas 01:17, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Cleanup 

message: When this was added by an anonymous user back in July I wasn't sure if it was nonsense or might actually have some basis, so I assumed good faith...  However all my attempts to verify this usage of "string" as a measure of time have failed, including a browse through the OED entry for string.  Since nobody else has provided a reasonable citation since then, I've removed it from the article for now.   --Dfred (talk) 22:59, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "A measure of time approximately equivalent to 10 minutes" 

message: Moved Tennis Portal tag to Strings (tennis) instead of this page.  Mjquinn_id (talk) 22:40, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tennis
Talk:Honeybush

message: Greenman-
Where did you hear that Honeybush has caffeine? I can find no source that indicates that there are even trace amounts, I would assume that current analyses (no caffeine) are correct...? do you have a source of which I am unfamiliar?
-war3rd
war3d, 
If you go to Google and type Honeybush+0.01% you'll find quite a lot of references to it. 0.01 is basically caffeine free, which is probably why in most of the marketing literature it's refered to in that way.
- greenman
Suggest that this page be linked to the stub on Cyclopia, (I went to Cyclopia first to search for info on honeybush and got nothing). At least the existing species mentioned in this article are a start to fleshing out that stub. 120.153.8.61 (talk) 00:25, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Nuclear fission

message: In "Output" it is shown two different values for how much energy is released from uranium fission. 
Currently it is says that:  
"Thus, in any fission event of an isotope in the actinide mass range, roughly 0.9 MeV are released per nucleon of the starting element."
''
Two paragraphs further down it says: 
"When a uranium nucleus fissions into two daughter nuclei fragments, about 0.1 percent of the mass of the uranium nucleus appears as the fission energy of ~200 MeV. "
What does the second sentence mean? I can read it that each nuclei release 200 MeV but that can´t be correct. What is the original text wanting to say and is there a better way to reframe it? Is that entire paragraph even correct? Keleyr (talk) 18:39, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Without looking it up, it sounds about right, since 235 x 0.9 = 211.5 Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Output" wrong or at least hard to understand  

message: Lise Meitner is perhaps the most outstanding physicist not to have obtained a Nobel Prize. She is widely recognized as the codiscoverer of nuclear fission with Otto Hahn. Only Hahn received the Nobel for the discovery. Probably the biggest travesty in the history of science. 206.146.91.223 (talk) 02:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lise Meitner
Talk:Western Union

message: NOTE: I’m proposing the following edits for FleishmanHillard on behalf of Western Union. I am a paid editor and aware of the COI guidelines. Please let me know of any questions or comments as you review. Thanks for your time and consideration. Jon Gray (talk) 01:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there a secondary source for this or is there just a primary? What about a press release from Western Union? –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 15:59, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  The dismissal wasn’t picked up in media or another secondary source beyond the Department of Justice’s notice I used, but I’ve provided a couple of additional references below that validate the fact that those charges were dropped in March 2020 – the order granting dismissal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania and Western Union’s Q1 2020 10-Q SEC filing. Thanks for reviewing and please let me know of any other questions. Jon Gray (talk) 23:31, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:   Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 20:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you! Jon Gray (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Request 

message: NOTE: I am proposing this edit for FleishmanHillard on behalf of Western Union. I am a paid editor and aware of the COI guidelines.
 
I am submitting this edit request to propose a correction to the infobox. Currently, the Chairman position is listed being held by Jack M. Greenberg, however Jeffrey A. Joerres was appointed to the Chairman role in 2020 . Thus, we propose updating the infobox to reflect this change.
 
Thank you for your consideration. Caleb Fenner (talk) 20:11, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 20:20, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Request - infobox 

message: Did Western Union's lawyers force the Western Onion singing telegram company to change its name to Eastern Onion because its parody name was too close to Western Union? 17.185.2.65 (talk) 19:11, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eastern Onion singing telegrams
Talk:IS-IS

message: I tried to search for this article using the Wikipedia search function, and it was quite difficult. I typed in "IS-IS" without the quotes and it came up with completely irrelevent things without even that written in the page such as The Price Is Right game show.
I then tried to search for "Intermediate System to Intermediate System" without the quotes and still it didn't even have that on the first page.
Finally I tried to search for "Intermediate System to Intermediate System routing", without the quotes, and finally it came up with this article as the first result.
I think this article should be boosted in relevency when searching for these terms.
Ayu_Aikousha.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.50.176.79 (talk) 01:25, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone ever tried searching for this article? 

message: From TFA: "While OSPF is natively built to route IP and is itself a Layer 3 protocol that runs on top of IP"
Mind=blown. IP is a layer 3 protocol (see OSI_Model#Layer_3:_Network_Layer) so how can OSPF run on top of IP if it sits besides it?Zoef1234 (talk) 12:25, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which layer? 

message: Why is there nothing on IS-IS addressing in the article? IS-IS has a somewhat unique addressing scheme and some explanation of it would be nice. 173.81.25.50 (talk) 18:15, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: IS-IS itself doesn't have addressing. The addressing comes from CLNS which is the protocol that IS-IS operates on top of. Like OSPF itself doesn't have any addressing, it runs on top of IP. 2A02:8011:3:0:3898:62AB:544A:CCAA (talk) 10:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addressing? 

message: I think it would be more accurate to say that OSPF was derived from an early draft of IS-IS. Paul Koning (talk) 22:24, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship with OSPF
Talk:Cathedral

message: > A Cathedral is a (frequently but not always large) Christian church, the central church of a bishopric.
That sounds pretty clumsy. What about moving the large bit to the end -- although I can't offhand think of a graceful phrasing. The best I can do offhand is:
A Cathedral is a Christian church, the central church of a bishopric, and usually an imposing building.
::Eliminating the weaselling, how is it now? Btw, I think the travelling bishops thing is a little fanciful. Like the Somerseatas: an invention of Edwardian antiquaries, were they not? Somerset, published in 1907 by G.W. Wade and J.H. Wade, (authors of Rambles in Somerset, Rambles in Devon etc) briefly features them. Are authenic  "Somerseatas" mentioned in any document? Why are we taliing about Roman cathedrals in England anyway. This isn't waffle, it's marmelade... Wetman 01:12, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  opening 

message: Hey guys. Does anybody have a guide/URL to the styles/rhythms of Byzantine cathedrals? I need it for my article in the Saint Andrew cathedral in the city of patras... thanks. Project2501a 20:43, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Byzantine cathedrals