lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Imino acid

message: :Amino acids containing secondary amine group (the only natural compound of this type is proline) are sometimes named imino acids[1][2], though this usage is disputed by some.
Hydroxyproline also occurs in nature. N-methylated amino acids like NMDA also occur naturally and contain secondary amine groups.--Eloil 00:13, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My organic chemistry colleagues tell me that imino- should be reserved for -N= exactly as stated in the opening paragraph; proline is a secondary amine, not an imine. The problem is that its description as an imino acid appeared in a few older textbooks, particularly those written from a medical rather than chemical viewpoint. Like many textbook errors, this gets repeated in newer textbooks that copied their content from older ones. 96.54.32.44 (talk) 01:16, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, so i 've learned it too, that there must be a double bond between the nitrogen]] and carbon. Thoses are amides from an imine and are called Iminamide. Examples: Sulfaguanidine , 1-(4-Nitrophenylethyl)piperidylidene-2-(4-chlorophenyl)sulfonamide. 77.177.43.109 (talk) 10:38, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  secondary amino acids 
Talk:Books of Kings

message: Please could there be learned comment on the name of the second book: “2 Kings”, 2Kings”, “Kings II”, “II Kings”? JDAWiseman (talk) 10:56, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  “2 Kings”, 2Kings”, “Kings II”, “II Kings” 

message: Recently, @Mozartnut introduced plot summaries that were dozens of paragraphs long (I believe the bytes added were 30k or so) and this is unwieldy for any work, let alone a complex set of Bible books. The plot needs to be summarized, condensed, high-level view for this article, lest we rewrite the book in so many words. I've reverted and I've tagged the section as too long already. The other one is tagged for expansion; fair enough, but don't go hog-wild. Elizium23 (talk) 20:32, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The sections are long and unhelpful. It creates occasion for the dispute we currently have over what needs citations. I was just coming here to ask you to be more specific as to what you wanted the citations for. I'm also unhappy by the inaccuracies like changing "judge" to "wisdom" in 1K3:9. The text of the Books warrant more careful studies and citations would be better for all the content. But this might resolve both issues - All of the Bible book articles I've seen have sections for outlines without long plot synopsis like Acts_of_the_Apostles#Outline. Couldn't we do something similar here?  Eunomiäs (talk) 22:57, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The non-English terms in non-Latin alphabets require citations to reliable secondary sources that reflect their definition, usage, orthography, etc. Elizium23 (talk) 23:07, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long plot 

message: Where was it written? Σαιντ Γεώργιος (talk) 16:47, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Talk:Public holidays in France

message: nice so yaaaa
Somebody who knows the legal matters better than me should look into this. As far as I know, the only really government-imposed holiday is May 1st; the rest, for private employers, is collective convention, as far as I know. Am I wrong? David.Monniaux 19:11, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: ...it is unknown whether it will still be current in 2006
And the result was..? -- Picapica 21:17, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whit Monday 

message: In France, Epiphany is mostly called 'Epiphanie' rather than 'Fête des rois'. Lpn- 08:33, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Epiphany 

message: Is the following Monday then not worked? Paul Beardsell (talk) 10:39, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  But what if the holiday falls on a Sunday? 

message: Why are Good Friday/Vendredi Saint and St. Stephen's Day/Saint Etienne only celebrated in Alsace region and Moselle department ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.5.184.243 (talk) 16:36, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: they are puplic holiday only in Alsace and Moselle (and it has to do with Alsace and Moselle having been part of Germany (Elsaß-Lothringen)in the past)178.210.114.106 (talk) 16:17, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only Alsace and Moselle - Why ? 

message: Whit Monday is 50 days after Easter, ot 49.  Easter is always on Sunday.  49 is divisible by 7, so that 49 days after Easter is Sunday, not Monday  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.175.136.99 (talk) 23:29, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whit Monday 

message: "There are 11 official public holidays in France.[1] The Alsace region and the Moselle department observe 2 additional days.[2] which means that the average number of observed public holidays is 8.6 and ranges from 7 to 10,[3] one of the lowest in the world.[4]"
This is extremely contradictory and makes absolutely no sense.  Where are these numbers coming from?  Source 3 (just the French version of this page :( ) says there are 11 public holidays (not 7 to 10).  And source 4 (which doesn't exist anymore other than cached versions) also says France has 11 public holidays and puts it in 8th place with the lowest place being 12th because there's lots of overlap (62 countries in the study).  So saying it is one of the lowest in the world is true, but even that seems like an odd way to characterize this data because there are 30 other countries (again, out of 62) with the same or fewer public holidays.  In comparison, there are 15 countries with 14 or more public holidays (1st-4th places).  I'm going to modify this so it makes sense.
[4] http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:nPDlzf-e3CgJ:www.mercer.fr/press-releases/holiday-entitlements-around-the-world+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=fr
193.52.102.12 (talk) 11:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public Holiday Comparison
Talk:Spadina Expressway

message: I have added the weasel tag to the "Outcomes" section, as it contains the following statements which are unsourced or weasel words:
* many businesses disliked the new urban-reform measures which were seen as anti-development policies.
There is no source for this statement... which businesses stated this? This is a weasel.
* Because of its percieved anti-car policies, Toronto was no longer as attractive to development as it formerly was and businesses migrated towards Peel Region and York Region where taxes were lower and where there were less growth restrictions and superior freeway networks.
Where is the evidence that anti-car policies caused the economic slowdown? Where is the evidence that freeways were the reason for the growth of Peel and York regions? There are many confounding factors in the economic growth and decline of different areas and I don't think you can attribute it to just freeways.
If there are no objections I will change the section in a couple of weeks.
Dave 14:07, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Weasel words

message: Before I get going, put the potential future title aside, as that would take some pondering. Does it not make sense to merge the bit of useful content from Allen Road into this in order to avoid duplication and to make this more comprehensive? Allen Road is the Spadina Expressway after all. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 00:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with this. Haljackey (talk) 04:51, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've instead merged into Allen Road, but now an appropriate title for the combined article can be decided. - Floydian τ ¢ 20:35, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging in Allen Road
Talk:Rip It Up (New Zealand)

message: from VfD:
Moved article's contents to New Zealand Music.  Right step? hfool 19:31, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Four Loves

message: I had to The Four Loves by C.S. Lewis for sociology and now i am having to relate the book to sociology. I can relate it to a specific matter or just the course study in general. If anyone has any information on this matter please feel free to help me out.
:Wait, you want us to do your sociology homework? Fat chance!!
::(much later), And so the sociology experiment, testing whether strangers freely give "gift-love", proves conclusive... Flipping Mackerel (talk) 00:55, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "Love is something more stern and splendid than mere kindness." - C. S. Lewis, The Problem of Pain 174.109.204.78 (talk) 13:37, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: I'm an idiot, please help me, internet!

message: I was under the impression that The Four Loves was originally a series of radio presentations, which were then transcribed into book form, not the other way around, as is currently indicated by the article. -- 128.104.117.179 20:42, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audio Recording of the book? 

message: In the listing of C. S. Lewis works, the book "Letters to Malcolm, Chiefly on Prayer," appears twice: once under fiction, which is incorrect, and later under non-fiction, which is correct.
Rev. Donald Grey Barnhouse
donaldgreybarnhouse@verizon.net  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.201.144.118 (talk) 04:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  error  

message: The use of "caritas" as a header made no sense, so I changed it to "charity". Lewis uses "charity" throughout The Four Loves and never uses the Latin term "caritas" (that I can find). Ztolstoy (talk) 04:55, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caritas? 

message: What would the modern equivilent for this term be? The others were in the description so I put them in like they were already for friendship. If it's not sexuality... would 'Romance' be an approximation? Nym (talk) 17:17, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: English Eros

message: In the gospel of John on Christmas eve, love(agape) and friendship (fileo)  are referred to. Guess it means to think of loved ones and friends on December 24th.  Scottbitsuie (talk) 19:00, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the gospel of john 

message: :book was based on a set of radio talks from 1958 which had been criticised in the U.S. at the time for their frankness about sex
Are there recordings of these radio talks? Or transcripts? LichCake (talk) 06:20, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: set of radio talks
Talk:Hay–Pauncefote Treaty

message: I think the habit of using American interchangably with United States (of America) creates an ambiguity in this article with regard to coastwise trade.  Undoubtedly the proposed toll exemption of 1912 was for U.S. ships going between ports of the United States, but did it also cover U.S. ships going between U.S. and/or Canadian and/or Mexican and/or Central and South American ports? Bob Burkhardt (talk) 15:41, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: "American" no longer used. I did edit out the rather antique word "coastwise", used at the time but not recognized now I don't think. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the follow up edits.  The article reads a lot more clearly now. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 19:01, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Coastwise trade

message: RE: "Sir Edward Grey, the British Foreign Secretary, lodged a protest and claimed that the act discriminated against British and other foreign vessels in contravention of the Treaty, and requested that the Senate forgo action on the bill in order that a detailed statement might be sent, but President Taft signed the Act on 24 August."
Did Grey lodge a protest before the Act passed the Senate? 
According to the New York Times of June 19, 1912: Grey told the House of Commons he was "watching the progress" of the bill that passed the House of Representatives on May 23 "but was unable to estimate to what extent British interests and treaty rights were affected by it until the bill passed the Senate and assumed its final form. Until then he thought that there was no ground for making representations on the subject to the United States Government." In a July 17 story, Grey tells the Commons that some features of the bill before the Senate "would not be consistent" with the Hay–Pauncefote Treaty and therefore his Majesty's Government "has thought it right to point out these objections to the Government of the United States in order that they might be taken into account while the bill is under consideration." According to the Times he makes this statement in response to a friendly question in order to forestall "premature and perhaps provocative discussion." On 4 September Grey writes to the Newcastle Chamber of Commerce that he is "making representations" to the U.S. Govt. On 10 October, Grey specifically reports that Great Britain "had expressed its view of the H-P Treaty while the Panama Canal bill was in progress, but it was impossible to make a final communication in regard to the bill, which was then being shaped." 
He definitely lodged a protest in December (in the next paragraph), but while the Senate is considering the bill, he did something different. Raised concerns? Registered concerns? Made representation? Gave the U.S. a heads up? Also, the entry presents Grey as a solitary actor with no sense of an aroused Parliament or British public opinion.
Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 19:14, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timing of Grey protest
Talk:Boundin'

message: Where can you get a copy of the short film? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.18.122.166 (talk • contribs) 
:This comment is a bit late, but it's on the second DVD of The Incredibles, along with a couple little things about it. -Peng 05:50, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hidden Easter egg on the Cars dvd? Could someone confirm this? I'll try it myself, but I think it sounds pretty bogus.
 
It is there! We found it once you play something from the main menu (like one of the shorts)and it is hilarious! Love the Guido's as the prairie dogs....Lothlorien priestess 14:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confirm trivia 
Talk:Eutopia (EP)

message: Personaly i dont think this should be mearged, its just as a valid artical as dytpia is, but ptobbably needs re-wighting a littleso is mopre independent from Utopia, but not meared.tooto 20:02, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Thank you for working hard to improve this article; unfortunately the picture of the album cover you keep trying to upload to Wikimedia Commons is likely to be deleted again shortly.   As per your Commons Talk page copyrighted album covers cannot be hosted on Wikimedia Commons.
  
However; Wikipedia, itself, may allow the hosting and limited use of a low resolution ‘non-free’ image in an article, where the item is itself the subject of the article, as this may constitute ‘Fair Use’. A detailed Rationale must be provided to show how the criteria for this are met – a reviewing editor will have the final say on this.
Please have a read through the policy and guidelines at WP:NOTFREE and WP:FUR. This template, specifically for album covers, would then be attached to the Wikipedia image file page – it also includes a useful summary of instructions for the uploader. Please see this file: :File:Adele-Rolling In The Deep.jpg as an example of how this works.  Please note that the Adele image file is hosted on Wikipedia itself not Wikimedia Commons.
You, or another editor of this page, are welcome to have a go at this, and I wish you every success with it.  Many thanks Crep171166 (talk) 00:29, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Commons:File:MA Eutopia 2020.jpg|File:MA Eutopia 2020.jpg]] 
Talk:Marcus Licinius Crassus

message: There is no evidence to Caesar being a military tribune under Crassus. It is very possible for he was Tribune at the time of Spartacus's revolt, but not historical evidence can be found to back this.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.46.158.75 (talk) 02:23, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caesar. 

message: The roman convention indicates in a name "John Doe X F Y N" where X is the father's praenomen and Y the grandfather praenomen. How come Crassus could be name "P F P N" where both P stand for Publius, and the article says his grandfather is named Marcus?
24.200.206.181 (talk) 20:37, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grandfather 

message: I have deleted the silly piece of folk etymology about the expression "crass error" in Spanish (or any other language) coming from the name Crassus. It comes from the Latin "crassus" meaning "gross" (with which it is ultimately cognate), which is no doubt the origin of the Latin name. The reference to the Spanish Academy given does not support any linkage to Crassus, so whoever added this story was being dishonest as well as silly. Intelligent Mr Toad (talk) 07:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Crass error

message: The conception of Crassus as 'wealthiest man in history' wasn't even true in Roman times, nevermind in all of history. His reputation in this matter is not mentioned by contemporaries such as Cicero, Caesar, or Sallust - only later authors such as Plutarch made this claim. Badian noted that Pompey could have 'bought and sold Crassus'. 
Crassus was certainly a man of immense wealth, but the claim to 'wealthiest man in Rome' - nevermind 'wealthiest man in histroy' is one which is completely unsourced. The difference between the richer Pompey and Crassus was that Crassus was boastful about his wealth, and Pompey was not.
I will aim to find sources from the literature, but for now there are precisely zero sources for the claim on this page (and only one on the 'list of wealthiest people' page, from a pop-history book), so the statement has no justification.
Fouriels (talk) 11:24, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wealth 

message: This article, along with several other articles about ancient Romans, was changed to use a different infobox, . In consequence, there's discussion about which infobox to use and how at Talk:Julius Caesar#Infobox and then at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome#Infoboxes for Roman office-holders as a more central location. NebY (talk) 19:47, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:Maquoketa Caves State Park

message: From DNR website policy:
Disclaimer and CopyrightUse of Our Material
Any person is hereby authorized to view, copy, print, and distribute documents on this site without condition. We ask you to extend the courtesy of crediting the material to the Iowa Department of Natural Resources. Any distributed copy of a web document, or portion thereof, is a reproduction and any changes made to any Iowa Department of Natural Resources material will invalidate the document. 
I am not sure how to best credit the info to Iowa DNR.
Would be nice if there was some detailed information about each of the caves in this system.  How about detailed maps of some of the longer caves?  I searched the innerweb for a couple of hours and found nothing.  I'd especially like to know how long a particular small crawling cave (enterence located from the Middle Dancehall entrance) is or if it is a dead end?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.202.159.165 (talk) 15:10, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: Should we put something up showing the caves are closed due to the bats having whitenose syndrome?  TalenSoti  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.26.180.30 (talk) 16:41, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cave closure

message: On Maquoketa Caves State Park shooting talk page user 64.229.88.43 says that the Maquoketa Caves State Park article needs updating. Unfortunately, the user has not been clear about what needs updating in the Maquoketa Caves State Park article and I do not understand what they are referring to precisely. I have added a section and link to the shooting article but I do not know if anything else needs updating. So I thought I would be bold and mention the problem here, in case anyone else knows of other updates that are needed. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 08:47, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  In need of updating
Talk:CIDC-FM

message: ----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.232.23.68 (talk) 23:24, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

message: For what it's worth, I reverted an edit today which suggested that there was somehow a reason why Z103.5 can't pronounce its brand name as "Zed" (the more usual Canadian pronunciation) rather than "Zee". There isn't, as far as I know, any specific reason why they can't pronounce it that way — they just don't do it, which isn't the same thing. If there is actually some specific reason why they're not permitted to pronounce it as "zed", could you please show a source to confirm this? Bearcat 22:51, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Zee vs. Zed
Talk:Montesquieu (disambiguation)

message: Shouldn't we do it the other way round? What I suggest, for, I hope, obvious reasons:
(1) Move this disambiguation page to Montesquieu (disambiguation)
(2) Move Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu to Montesquieu.
Any comments? <KF> 21:46, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)
:I moved this to its current location, and redirected Montesquieu to Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu. The debate about which name his page should be under can take place on his talk page, if people care. Christopher Parham (talk) 20:08, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Goal line (gridiron football)

message: All versions of this article thru this writing (12/11/04) are fundamentally wrong.  They're really about the goal LINE, which they take to mean the same thing but is different.  The goal is a structure (or the plane it delimits) in various sports, including American football to which these versions were apparently written, but is not the same as the goal line.  Conceptually the easiest fix here would be to change the title of the entry to "goal line", but I don't know how to do that and to track down all links pointing to it.  I may be reached at robgood@bestweb.net .
:"Goal line" is a more common term. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:32, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong
Talk:Succession to the Crown Bill 2004

message: Sadly, Ashley Y has decided to take the less than clear term "cognatic primogeniture" around here, not respecting the need of the encyclopedia to use terms which have better consensus about its meaning.
cognatic seems to be controversial term re precise definition, therefore a term having more consensus of its meaning should be used.
Particularly here because the primogeniture system now used in UK has also been called "cognatic". 213.243.176.92 17:54, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  cognatic 

message: Now see Succession to the Crown Bill 2012. Qexigator (talk) 15:59, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Succession to the Crown Bill 2012
Talk:Kęstutis

message: It's strange, that in Lithuanian book i'd read in english Kęstutis was wroten as Kestutis, without ogonek...
--Untifler 22:29, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: He's Lithuanian and the name is Lithuanian. Modernization is not the same as "Lithuanization", hardly possible in this case. The spelling isn modernized, so what? That's really the norm. And the modernized Lithuanian name is the most common way of referring to him in English, so all else is mute. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 12:58, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If Kęstutis was fighting the more literate German Knights, then maybe there are some primary sources mentioning his name in German (from Teutonic Annals) which could be cited in this article? Because Lithuanian alphabet with "ę" formed only in 19(??)th century, and the first Lithuanian writing samples were found from 1503-1525 (Lithuanian_language#History), so "Kęstutis" is like an invention of later centuries to come; he himself could have pronounced his name totally different and only people who met him could have had the opportunity to pronounce his name and to write it down in their own (literary) language: Ruthenian, German, Old Polish.
Kazkaskazkasako (talk) 09:58, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name and primary sources