lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hannah Ashworth

message: There are many issues with this article. No references have been cited for any claims, it is written asif the fictional character is a real person. Need changing to explain elements of fiction clearly. 
Break down the article into the following sections. 
*Creation    -  Background - Casting
*Development -  Personality -  Relationships
*Storylines
*Reception
*In popular culture
*References
*External links
You can condense the storylines right down, put relationship info in the right part. There are plenty of references out there for this character I am sure.
What do you all think?Raintheone (talk) 18:37, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I made the changes and have improved the article adding all the above.Raintheone (talk) 02:01, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have done this with some pages, it will take time but eventually all of them should be the same. I added creation, development etc. for the articles I changed too. Whoniverse93 talk? 21:34, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete rewrite needed. 

message: Please leave her as Hannah Ashworth. She is still credited as Hannah Ashworth not Hannah Osborne! Until it changes, if it changes, then the article may say Hannah Osborne. Whoniverse93 talk? 21:40, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the alias "Hannah Ashworth-Osborne" as that is what Nancy and Zoe referred to her after they discovered her marriage. However, I agree that her name is still Hannah Ashworth until it is official confirmed as changing to Osborne. ~~ [ジャム][t - c] 21:57, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I hate how people take things they assume and don't even know and add it. I believe she will always be called Hannah Ashworth, after all, the marriage was not a planned one plus she is leaving this year so I doubt she would change it. Whoniverse93 talk? 22:05, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I shan't speculate on her future and all that, but until Channel 4 decide to start calling her Hannah Osborne, Ashworth is what we will stick with. ~~ [ジャム][t - c] 22:08, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hannah Ashworth/Osborne 

message: What course is Hannah Studying at HCC? D.Dudley (talk) 17:44, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: What's she doing at college
Talk:Josh Ashworth

message: All the subheadings under the "Storylines" section need serious cleanup; not every subheading is a storyline in its own right and should be merged together. The earlier storylineás are pretty well-kept and appropriate, but towards the end the subheadings increase unnecessarily breaking up entire storylines into subheadings of only a few episodes (or less). •97198 talk 17:28, 33 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Storylines cleanup
Talk:Telecommunications in Cambodia

message: It seems that the "mobile networks" list are incorrect. The list at http://www.gsmworld.com/roaming/gsminfo/cou_kh.shtml seem good with 8 operators (2 planned ones included). Anyone familial with the matter modifying the list? Jcisio (talk) 15:36, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mobile networks
Talk:Mandy Richardson

message: This might come up in the future so. Mandy's duration is October 96 - June 06, plus 6 months in 08... = 10 years, 3 months all together... making Steph Cunningham the longest serving female character... who has now surpassed this by one month, she still has longer in the serial.RAIN the ONE (Talk) 11:49, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Is Mandy even coming back? --2.122.252.83 (talk) 18:32, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes she is. Stephanie Waring mentioned in the interview with Digital Spy that they are filming storylines together now. Dunn has confirmed this too.RAIN*the*ONE BAM 18:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

text: Do you have a source for this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.197.187.32 (talk) 12:40, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: What for, there are two points mentioned above?RAIN*the*ONE BAM 12:44, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

text: You'll need a source if your thinking of adding that info to the article.RaintheOne BAM 20:59, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Duration

message: RAIN*the*ONE BAM 19:16, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Tong Yabghu Qaghan

message: Well, I had checked, and no response for this removal. Eiorgiomugini 18:28, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal

message: I removed this text:
The concept of identifying with Khazar khagans was being rejected by a few scholars such as Chavannes, Uchida and Xue Zhongzeng,Xue 1992, p. 286-287 one of the main reason involved with his date of death, which generally had been disputed from 626 to 630, due to the differs from primary sources.Xue, p. 289
In the context of the paragraph this makes no sense. What is being objected to? What the article says is that Ziebel and Tong Yabghu are identical, and that Theophanes identifies Ziebel as "Khagan of the Khazars". Is Xue (you give no citation for the others) arguing that Ziebel is not Tong Yabghu, or that Theophanes does not actually identify him as khagan of the Khazars? What is the basis for the disagreement I am trying to help make this article good but continually restoring grammatical errors helps no one. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 18:29, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is undisputed fact that Theophanes named Ziebel khagan of the Khazars. What I believe you are saying is that Xue and the others he cites claim that Ziebel is not the same as Tong Yabghu, and Tong Yabghu may have died before the Third War. I will add this back in. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 18:54, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

text: I've restored the reference. If it's not exactly what you meant then let's try and work it out here on talk before adding to the article. I am trying to proceed in good faith with you.Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 19:00, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

text: My intention was never to obscure or remove legitimate information. It was to make sure that the article is readable and understandable. I am happy to work with you (or whoever) to that end.Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 19:16, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Khazars

message: As seen in the earlier talks of this page, Tong's death date seems to be debatable. In this article, the date is given as 628, with a  note that 626 is also a possiblity. But this conflicts with the article Göktürks which gives the date as 630. According to some, Tong had been killed by his uncle in 630.  So, this discrepancy needs the attention of an expert. 
By the way, yabghu is a title of a vassal king.  Since Tong's grandfather Tardu had decleared independence, khagan is a better title for Tong. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 12:02, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy 

message: This is not good enought to be a GA. Enlisting reasons in a while. TrangaBellam (talk) 13:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues
Talk:Foxy's pirate crew

message: Foxy's article is saying that his FUNimation dub voice is being done by Gillbert Gottfried. Not only is there no reference to this, they're not even up to Foxy's arc in the dub yet. Does anyone have evidence to support this claim? If not then I will take this off.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.6.222 (talk) 07:32, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Foxy's FUNi VA?
Talk:Nancy Hayton

message: RAIN*the*ONE BAM 02:38, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: I don't watch Hollyoaks so I don't know, but was User:Tinamckintyre23's page move valid? Is this character truly better known as Nancy Osborne? –anemoneprojectors– 14:49, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Her common name is Nancy Hayton. Please could you move it back? George Sorby 16:39, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Whilst I am against the name "Hayton" and prefer the correct character name of "Osborne", it is quite obviously a contentious issue and needs discussion prior to any move.  I tried moving it back myself, but it isn't working.  Chaheel Riens (talk) 17:26, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved the page back to proper title per the above discussion and WP:COMMONNAME. George Sorby 20:38, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Chaheel Riens - this Tinamckintyre23 is a sockpuppet and only moved the article to annoy three editors they keep returning to annoy. This discussion is not really needed. Unless we want to keep feeding the sockpuppet.Rain the 1 23:22, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough.  I had a look on the talk page to leave a messaage, and noticed a sockpuppet comment, but that's not such a rare thing on a page filled with other warnings.  Chaheel Riens (talk) 06:35, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Didn't even realise there was discussion of the title on the original talk page (i.e. here), if I had I'd have not even bothered. I was assuming good faith but I'm not sure I ever should with that particular user. –anemoneprojectors– 08:02, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title 

message: "In the character's early stages, she was portrayed as a less conventional character compared to the rest of the Hollyoaks teenagers." What does this mean? I can't find it anywhere else in the article, I was wondering if someone could please explain so that we can clarify the sentence? DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:53, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  ?
Talk:Suzanne Ashworth

message: Murder
Is it true that Suzanne will be murderd by the same man who killed India??.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.121.192.200 (talk) 12:56, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: See it just goes to show you should never assume what characters maiden names are, who would have thought she was called Suzanne Dick... lmao!RAIN*the*ONE BAM 19:35, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suzanne's maiden name!
Talk:Carmel McQueen

message: *RaintheOne BAM 16:57, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: The characters name is now Valentine, which is clearly stated in the very first line of the article lede.  The E4 website corroborates that this is her corrct name - which let us not forget is the official Hollyoaks site - and as per the Manual of Style which relates to infoboxes:
* The template should have a large, bold title line. Either a table caption or a header can be used for this. It should be named the common name of the article's subject but may contain the full (official) name; this does not need to match the article's Wikipedia title, but falling back to use that (with the  magic word) is usually fine. It should not contain a link.
 
(My emphasis)
There is no reason to keep insisting on the incorrect character title which is patently different to that used in the article.  The article explains that McQueen was a previous name - before marriage - which explains the discrepency between the article name and infobox and name used in article space. Chaheel Riens (talk) 07:23, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox title
Talk:Fletch (Hollyoaks)

message: I noticed the comment on the main page not to add Rhys, Neville and Suzanne as his family. He stated on September 4th that Suzanne was his aunt.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Irishboi (talk • contribs) 22:15, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Family
Talk:Tom Cunningham

message: D4nnyw14 (talk) 22:52, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Warren Fox

message: * Jaci Stephn wishes Warren had stayed dead because of repitive drug storylines.RAIN*the*ONE BAM 19:12, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/711562596  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:A374:5D00:F852:8E09:621E:D17B (talk) 22:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review page for long term vandalism.
Talk:Side dish

message: This article links to several simple vegetables and terms them side dishes. To me a side dish might be mashed potatoes, roast, baked, boiled or perhaps aloo gobi. But a simple potato cannot be called a dish. Likewise Category:Side_dishes. Batternut (talk) 22:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: so, when you have say meatloaf and a serving of peas or broccoli or cauliflower or even squash, the meatloaf is the side dish and the veggies are the entree?  Sure.  Maybe in your household. Postcard Cathy (talk) 02:30, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vegetables as side dishes?
Talk:Gilly Roach

message: as Gilly left hollyoaksas he as not been seen since January 27 2010.--86.165.186.203 (talk) 21:46, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  January Exit 

message: RAIN*the*ONE BAM 15:35, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:O.B. (Hollyoaks)

message: I guess someone could always put links to some of the recaps at Digital Spy or TV.com that cover episodes from the past few years, but I'm not sure how much resource there would be for stories that go back years and years. 
As for notability, he's been a fairly major character on the show for over a decade. Going by most articles for TV characters, that would seem to be notable. If the person who put the tags has any thoughts on the matter, then I'll go with your suggestions. --JamesB3 (talk) 14:31, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding sources and notability
Talk:Russ Owen

message: Just a note - Danni and Russ never married, they engaged only.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.158.196.4 (talk) 11:44, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *RaintheOne BAM 16:52, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Zoe Carpenter

message: Can someone please tell me when Zoe is leaveind and will Lydia be found out.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheep 2009 (talk • contribs) 00:14, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Either late 2009 or early 2010. I don't know if Lydia will be found out but since Zoe is due to face court this month, it seems unlikely they will keep the character in prison for her final month or so, so therefore it looks like Zoe could be released but there are no announced plans for Lydia to leave yet. W93 (talk) 01:54, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: well i was reading the christmas TV mag and Lydia stabs Zoe on New Years Day.--Sheep 2009 (talk) 10:56, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Lydia does indeed stab Zoe on New Years Eve but it appears Zoe is alive and well afterwards. That is going by pictures on the e4 website that are set between 4-8 January . Mabuska (talk) 18:45, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zoe's Exit 

message: RAIN*the*ONE BAM 04:35, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Ste Hay

message: RAIN*the*ONE BAM 05:29, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: I find the use of the word "homosexual" in this article deeply offensive, because it reduces everything to sex acts in contexts where that is not appropriate. It isn't a neutral term because it is used by anti-gay hate groups as a faux clinical term to dehumanize gays. The proper way to refer to people is by the name they choose for themselves. Gay people seldom refer to themselves as "homosexuals," never go to a "homosexual" bar, never read a "homosexual" web site, and never enter into a "homosexual" marriage. The proper term is either "gay" or "same-sex."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by KenWC (talk • contribs) 15:17, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well we do not censor on Wikipedia - It offends you on a personal level - however many people have read this article and never raised issue. You cannot really say what the "proper term" is without providing any evidance.Rain the 1 15:24, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objection to the use of the word "Homosexual" 
Talk:Ben Davies (Hollyoaks)

message: RAIN*the*ONE BAM 19:14, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Johnno Dean

message: I have removed the following rumour to the talk page as it does not belong in the article without a source.  I've put it here for ease of transfer in case a source is provided.  However at the moment they seem pure speculation.
Since summer 2008, there has been speculation that Johnno may return to Hollyoaks in 2009 with his wife Michelle and their son Presley to try and help get Jake released and bring Sean Kennedy's true murderer Warren Fox to justice and also help Jake come to terms with his mental health issues, although actor Colin Wells has yet to confirm this.
sassf (talk) 21:40, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rumours
Talk:Mark Jury

message: : I added the in-universe template Feb 2017.  Looks like the citation tag has been on for 10 years (since Feb 2007.) Curdigirl (talk) 14:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'd like to merge Mark Jury into List of Hollyoaks characters (2005) given WP:NFICT. While the latter certainly has issues with in-universe writing and bulkiness, they would not be unduly increased by merging this page. If there are no objections in the next few weeks I will move forward with this plan.
Vegantics (talk) 21:07, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: , since I've just merged two Hollyoaks stubs into a yearly list, I'll take on this one too, esp since it was just PRODed. – Meena • 14:11, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger
Talk:Dawn Cunningham

message: No sources cited for this character's apparent year of birth. We know she had Bethany at 16 but this can't have happened in 1994, as claimed by some users, because Bethany was clearly older than ten when she came to look for Jack in 2004 and Darren Osborne flirted with her before finding out who she was. 
A possible way of verifying exactly when Bethany was born would be to confirm how old she was during the earlier Hollyoaks storyline where Dawn found she was in need of a transplant.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dotsandloops (talk • contribs) 14:03, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This discussion is also taking place on Talk:Ruth Osborne#Date of birth. Whoniverse93 (talk) 14:36, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth
Talk:Cindy Cunningham

message: when will cindy leave Hollyoaks tempary to have her baby.--Sheep 2009 (talk) 23:00, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exit 

message: Should the name be changed yet? She's calling herself Cunningham again now, and the name on the pre-nup shown on-screen clearly said Cindy Cunningham rather than Hutchinson. Ooh, Fruity  Ooh, Chatty  21:41, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not her real name again though. She and Tony are yet to divorce... and when she kept referring to herself as Cunningham to Steph whilst having a go at her, Steph pointed out she is still a Hutchinson and Cindy agreed, but said not for long... so it's best to wait until she becomes Longford if she does at all. (That prenup was for when she gets the divorce through.) RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 22:40, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: RAIN*the*ONE BAM 05:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: When exactly did Cindy leave the show initially? The Hollyoaks: The Official Companion book states that she left in November 2000 but on here it says she and Holly left in 2001. Does anybody know which is correct and when Cindy and Holly departed onscreen?82.47.191.23 (talk) 22:02, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: First Exit

message: Beau is not her stepson. Just because she was once married to Tony doesn't automatically make all his children her stepchildren. Same for Mac and Dirk's children. Tony didn't even know Beau existed when he was married to Cindy. 80.233.62.84 (talk) 19:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed Beau since whilst he was her stepson, they never interacted in that time. However, I have kept the others as she acted as a stepmother to Liberty upon her 2018 return, and when the Nightingales debuted she was still married to Mac. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 03:42, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family relationships
Talk:Jude Cunningham

message: I think this article is too negative - I thought Jude's ending was fairly upbeat (depending on your views on getting away with ripping off jewellery thieves) - she got the necklace in the end and ran off to Spain, where she still is. 
Amazingtessa (talk) 12:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of diplomatic missions of Equatorial Guinea

message: There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations#Formatting_of_diplomatic_missions_lists - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 00:34, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at WP:FOR on formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" article
Talk:Transport in Libya

message: While Google Map does seem to show railway lines under construction, it is not always easy to tell if they are railways or roads, and the names of the stations are hard to pick too.
Tabletop 09:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Under construction. 

message: Would it make sense to shift the timeline of the railways to Libyan Railways and leave this page with just a summary of the situation?
Wheeltapper (talk) 20:47, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That would make sense.  Tabletop (talk) 05:34, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline 

message: Construction has started on new railways in Libya.    Tabletop (talk) 08:49, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Construction started 

message: Are ports in Libya listed west to east?    Tabletop (talk) 05:32, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Port?
Talk:List of diplomatic missions of Eritrea

message: There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations#Formatting_of_diplomatic_missions_lists - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 00:34, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at WP:FOR on formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" article
Talk:Bombhead

message: Is anyone against this page being named 'Bombhead' on it's own? Never refered to by his real name.RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 21:59, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's a good idea actually, the page redirects here anyway. Similar to Fatboy (EastEnders). We could do the same with Barry "Newt" Newton. LostHavoc(talk) 23:40, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That isn't a good case for absolute majority topic. Even en.wp has Warren Ellis bibliography, apart from bomb head etc. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:12, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name 
Talk:County of Two Hills No. 21

message: The flag posted is an "own work" interpretation of this Two Hills' flag, in a rendering that looks cartoony and may be confused for the actual flag. An image of the actual flag is here - is there a copyright-free version to replace the cartoon one? Kdalgleish (talk) 12:09, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hand-drawn flag