lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fujian tea ceremony

message: The black tea serve in Kung-fu (Pinyin Gung Fu)tea ceremony originate from the Saochonng variety, originate and evolve from China Fujian state.
In chinese word, Kung-Fu has few meaning. i. The popular martial art. ii. works that need lots of effort and skill. It seems the second meaning are more likely. 
Sltan
it is not for just black tea it is for all leaf teas (not japanese powered tea).  the reason for gongfu brewing is because of yixing small teapots, where the temperature and water and tea amount can be monitored easily, now there is a kind of black tea that is called "gongfu black tea" but that is a name of a tea not a brewing method (gong/kung/kong Fu---tea brewing method).
i dont want to get knit picky about words but kungfu or gongfu means "do with care and skill".
in tea culture we usually say gong not kung this also helps to differentiate the chinese (kung-fu) fighting method (one of many) and the chinese gongfu tea brewing method one of many).
in fujian they have many methods of making tea there is no "one" fujian tea ceremony, what i mean is the article fujian tea ceremony is actually the gongfu (kungfu) "skill" method of brewing tea that is practiced in fujian. the gongfu tea ceremonies not exactly the same for every region, but are similar in the following the teas can be any kind, as long as it is leaf tea not powdered tea, the methodology of gongfu tea ceremony or gongfu brewing methodology is to brew good tea and to enjoy the tea, and usually socially, with others and casual talking.
--Sherdwen 04:50, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Votians

message: Can we get an English map? The current map is very confusing. Where exactly are the Votes positioned on this map in adjacency with the Ingrians and Izhorians.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.206.181.191 (talk) 21:13, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: a location map per request, but I feel this could be further improved. Unrelated, consider becoming a registered editor. — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR (talk) 21:21, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to Votians per WP:NOGOODOPTIONS and WP:NATURAL#1. I know that it wasn't even mentioned below, but hey, as a closer I have a unique chance to supervote here. More seriously, "Votians" has ample Google Books hits, does not seem to be outdated as "Vods", and is unambiguous, so it seems to tick all the boxes. Should anyone disagree, please ping me on my talk, or just open another RM, since this one reached no consensus about the best target.   No such user (talk) 14:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Votes →  – WP:ASTONISH, no clear primary topic, Voting gets 4,648 views compared with only 1,043 Votes for the ethnic group. Google, Images and Books only returns the voting meaning. Either Votes should redirect to Vote (disambiguation) or redirect to Voting or be a separate DAB page. Another possibility for the target is Vote people like others in :Category:Ethnic groups in Russia. Crouch, Swale (talk)  17:07, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 September 2021
Talk:Hacker (disambiguation)

message: Hackers....What are they and what is their culture?
* -- This disambiguation pages leads to excess segmentation. There are multiple sub-articles that were formerly one sole article, and it's likely that anyone interested in one would be interested in the rest. The "Hackers" article was large, but not unduly cumbersome, and the distinctions implied by the way the articles are divided leave out the possibility for grey areas and drift that were possible in one cohesive article. Several of the "Hacker" sub-articles should be conjoined. Does anyone have any thoughts pro or con? -- Adrian 16:27, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

message: Both hack, hacking, and hacker have poorly authored disambiguation pages. I'm going to attempt to clarifiy all three.
Pandemic 05:54, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification 

message: This page was moved from Hacker to Hacker (disambiguation). A number of talk page archive came along with this move, which I've just moved back to Talk:Hacker. They're also linked from the archives box above. --Pnm (talk) 01:50, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved this note to where the disambiguation page currently is. A number of moves unsynced the talk pages after this note, and they should all be fixed now. -- Tavix (talk) 23:24, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk page archives
Talk:Catalan solid

message: When I was reformatting the article a bit I added a new column to the main list table and now the table formatting is all broken and i cant figure out why, everything is in the right place but the boxes and shading refuse to draw, hopefully someone knows why and can make it work properly again
Arkanoid0 (talk) 07:44, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's because you inserted a period into the "class = ..." command in the table; I have fixed it. --JBL (talk) 13:58, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  table broke 

message: This table shows the catalan solids, grouped in parallel to the Wythoff constructions of the Archimedean solids given at Uniform_polyhedron#Convex_forms_and_fundamental_vertex_arrangements, and named by Conway polyhedron notation operators. Tom Ruen 20:01, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: These are ok, but my opinion is the ball-rod diameters are unnecessarily large, not showing any useful information about the polyhedra. You can make them smaller in Stella by right clicking on the "Use sphere and cylinder" tool button. SockPuppetForTomruen (talk) 21:25, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  test table 

message: First sentence says "In mathematics, a Catalan solid, or Archimedean dual, is a dual polyhedron to an Archimedean solid."  My mental parser trips over this right between "dual polyhedron" and "to an ...".   Should something be between there?  attached to?  converted to?  Don't grok.  Could someone fix who knows what this should say?  Tnx! 65.153.86.114 (talk) 19:51, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing is missing, but maybe the structure isn't as clear as it could be.  I made a tweak, what do you think?  --JBL (talk) 20:26, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

text: In slightly expanded form, it is a polyhedron which is dual to an Archimedean solid.  Sounds clear to me. AnonMoos (talk) 23:36, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Yeah, makes much better sense to me this way - thanks!  OTOH, since these shapes are far away from my expertise, I probably shouldn't fuss about sentences which wouldn't confuse others for whome the article was written.  Actually, I got here because I just wanted to look up dodecahedron. 65.153.86.114 (talk) 16:17, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, thanks.  Ideally Wikipedia articles should be readable by people who don't already know everything in them!  :)  --JBL (talk) 17:46, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  first sentence syntax
Talk:Árpád

message: In De Administrando Imperio, there are no 'Hungarians' or 'Magyars'. Only 'Turks' and 'Turkey'. Western European scholars thought that he referred to Magyars but it is not clear in this article that only the term 'Turk' appears in the text. Also these 'Turks', according to the text, are displaced from their original homeland by Pechenegs and migrated apparently towards modern-day Serbia too (not only Vojvodina, for example he mentions Trajan's bridge which is in Drobeta-Turnu Severin, Romania / Kladovo, Serbia). Now I don't say that the interpretation is incorrect but saying that Constantine VII said that Arpad was 'great prince of Hungary' isn't in reality correct.
--Apostolos Papadimitriou, 8:03:09 PM Monday, November 21, 2016 UTC  —Preceding undated comment added 20:05, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: And he also lists the rivers Tisza, Cris, Mures, Timis as the rivers of the land inhabited by the Hungarians/Turks. When writing about the "Turks", he refers to the Hungarians, consequntly when writing about "Turkey", he refers to their land, that is "Hungary". Borsoka (talk) 03:58, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes. Basically the names of the rivers in the text are Τούτης, Τιμήσης, Μορήσης, Κρίσος, Τίτζα. I just think that ideally we should differentiate between what actually exists in the text and its interpretation. That means, state that the text speaks about 'Turks', the author places them also in parts of modern-day Serbia and Romania but scholars have identified these 'Turks' with Magyars. Arpad isn't a 'great prince of Hungary' in the text, but of 'Turkey' (Also άρχων meant ruler, commander, chief, king, governor etc so translating as 'prince' is questionable). It's not so important overall but important enough for me to state it in the talk page. I won't bother. Apostolos Papadimitriou (talk) 11:48, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Hungarians were known by this name "Turks" for hundreds of years, even in the 1070s  ("ΓΕΩΒΙΤZΑC ΠΙΣΤΟC ΚΡΑΛΗC ΤΟΥΡΚΙΑC" (Geōbitzas pistós králēs Tourkías, meaning "Géza I, faithful kralj of the land of the Turks") Fakirbakir (talk) 19:03, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

message: Anon, if the cited reliable sources write about the Byzantine Empire, the Byzantines and the Byzantine Emperors, why do you want to use the terms "Roman Empire", "Romans" and "Roman Emperor"? Borsoka (talk) 01:55, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Byzantine vs Roman
Talk:2002 FIFA World Cup squads

message: On 1 Feb 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Football World Cup 2002 (squads).  Rossami (talk) 03:03, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: Football World Cup 2002 (squads) → 2002 FIFA World Cup (squads) – following the consensus of naming the World Cup articles as FIFA World Cup in Wikipedia, and consistency of naming the major international football tournaments.
Discuss here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Competitions#Requested move of Football World Cup articles.  --Pkchan 10:48, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved per consensus.  --Pkchan 14:07, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: There are some errors in this listing. For one, Paraguay and Belgium are in the wrong groups (Paraguay should be listed in Group B, and Belgium should be listed in Group H). For another, Iran did not participate in the 2002 FIFA World Cup. And finally, Republic of Ireland did participate (Group E).
72.71.137.46 (talk) 05:29, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep its waas udone and then vandalised again, thanks for pointing it out. Murry1975 (talk) 10:49, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect listings of teams participating in 2002 FIFA World Cup 
Talk:Metropolitan Police (disambiguation)

message: Start Class. Reassess, if you feel the need!
Dep. Garcia  ( Talk | Help Desk | Complaints )  11:44, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is New York City Police Department actually called "Metropolitan" police department, because this would be the only reason to include it here, otherwise this will become a list of all police dept's that are in a metropolice. Beta m (talk)
:If this article only refers to police force's named "Metropolitan", then it is a disambiguation page a needs to be overhauled as such. If there is a concept named "Metropolitan police" then each force should be cited as such. Right now, there are no citations other than for London's "Metropolitan police force". I will add the relevant templates. Rob984 (talk) 18:34, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: NYPD
Talk:MetroWest Medical Center

message: This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/MetroWest Medical Center.  The consensus was to keep it.  dbenbenn | talk 14:34, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Slope soaring

message: This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Slope soaring.  The result was to keep it, or merge it to Gliding.  dbenbenn | talk 14:44, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: I will move this model glider stuff to a new article on radio controlled model gliders. --Phatmonkey 20:36, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --Phatmonkey 22:24, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Model glider stuff
Talk:Stedelen

message: This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Stedelen.  There was no consensus.  dbenbenn | talk 14:49, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: My German is a little rusty, however...is there some relevance to the external link on this page? Ernstblumberg (talk) 03:35, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link?
Talk:Richard Eppes

message: The text of article was obtained from public domain site.
Darwinek 15:52, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bacilos

message: This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Bacilos.  The consensus was to keep it.  dbenbenn | talk 14:53, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is a good article that can be used to expand the article: http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2003-02-14/news/0302120887_1_bacilos-jorge-villamizar-latin-grammy  Basilisk4u (talk) 22:13, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: For future reference
Talk:Robert McAlpine

message: There is no such architect. The McAlpine family are property developers, not architects. There are two McAlpine companies and I can't remember whether this is the one named after a living family member Philip 15:29, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Sir Robert McAlpine, 6th Baronet and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 20#Sir Robert McAlpine, 6th Baronet until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:51, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sir Robert McAlpine, 6th Baronet" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Axon

message: For the record, I think this whole thing is ridiculous. It's ridiculous that Axon is using an unrelated Wikipedia article to air some grievance that stopped being relevant years ago. I think it's ridiculous that either of us is spending this much time and effort trying to save or destroy an article that all of a dozen people on the face of the planet will ever read. I think it's ridiculous that there is no editorial oversight on Wikipedia, and that a request for mediation gets no response from either the other party or from anyone at Wikipedia itself. Most of all, I think it's ridiculous that two reasonably intelligent adults can't discuss their differences and create a factual, relevant Wikipedia article. I do not know what the outcome will be, but I am going to see it through to its conclusion. If something this trivial can't be resolved in a reasonable fashion, then Wikipedia as a whole has some serious problems. -- Bblackmoor 15:42, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments By Participants
Talk:Old Dominion University

message: An unregistered editor is insisting that this article include a very detailed set of paragraphs about some of the research centers of this university. This article should cannot go into too much detail about any specific part of the university as it's a general encyclopedia article about the entire institution; WP:UNIGUIDE, WP:NOT, and WP:DUE are relevant Wikipedia policies and practices. Moreover, it's unacceptable to use misleading edit summaries such as "added the number of colleges and schools. clarified student population to "approximately"" when readding thousands of bytes of information about a completely different topic. ElKevbo (talk) 15:57, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessarily detailed information about research centers 

message: There have been several chunks of edits by IP users coming from the Old Dominion University's IP address set (Cox in Norfolk, general location near the river between Norfolk and Portsmouth) and one single purpose account named ODUMonarch. It appears likely that someone from the institution is editing this article undisclosed and hiding behind IP edits to avoid being identified. See above comment as well. These edits are usually not minor, and have included removing sections and adding unnecessarily specific detail. --18:48, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential Conflict of Interest Editing
Talk:2005 Thai general election

message: Can we get some pics of the opposition? Even if the thais don't think so, we need something more than just Thaksin Shinawatra.✏ Sverdrup 15:57, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hermann Amandus Schwarz

message: I find a lot of pages spelling Herrmann with two Rs, but also a lot with only one. If anyone has a reliable source to make sure which is correct it would be helpful Saintswithin 16:17, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Herbert Meschkowski, Mathematikerlexikon, [1] (http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Schwarz.html and Adalbert Duschek, Höhere Methematik II (1963) have it with one R, as I was informed by de:Benutzer:NeoUrfahraner. Saintswithin 08:50, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of name
Talk:Binary matrix

message: the article is so small!  --achab 21:52, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Presumably this is a generalisation of \mathbb{Z}_k.  Is this standard notation?  If it is, I wouldn't have thought that it's valid to equate it to GF(2), because one is a set, the other a field.  Oli Filth 03:20, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  <math>\mathbb{Z}_2</math> ? 

message: As far as I know, these two terms (Binary matrix and Logical matrix) both refer to the same thing, a matrix of any size where the entries are restricted to (0,1).  Is there a distinction I'm missing?  Otherwise, these two articles should be merged. jheiv talk contribs 23:01, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Perrin pseudoprime

message: The page had this
:though it is known that for n = 1 to 1000,000 there are only two composite values of n for which n divides P(n)
which I have removed in the light of this:
 
:This statement "though it is known that for n = 1 to 1000,000 there are only two composite values of n for which n divides P(n)" is wrong.
Charles Matthews 17:04, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Inspiration

message: Does anyone have any information about where inspiration comes from?  Is there any research out there that looks at the importance of different personal experiences in stimulating artistic creativity?
Different things inspire different people. Bush inspired me to write about is idiotic policies for example.
There may be vandalism in the entry for Inspire magazine's attribute to SITE.Halconen (talk) 19:35, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Brong-Ahafo region

message: What is the copyright status of this? It seems to come from http://www.world66.com/africa/ghana/brong_ahafo_region , which has a creative-commons license. Kappa 17:56, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Welcoming committee

message: I just was sending the cookie welcome to someone (as its my preferred one) and noticed there's no link to WP:Teahouse. Can that be added? I dont want to change anything without checking here first Soni (talk)  04:14, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Teahouse to the list of links on [[:Template:Welcome-cookie]] 

message: It just means a template put on pages.
--Kamil Hasenfeller (talk) 12:26, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Collapsed per WP:NOTFORUM and no attempt to improve the page. Mathglot (talk) 02:53, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think the commitee really sucks 

message: Members of the Welcoming Committee may be interested in this discussion about the interaction of the Welcoming committee with the plans for the Wikipedia Growth Team, in particular the "Newcomer homepage". Mathglot (talk) 02:49, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newcomer homepage discussion at Growth Team talk 

message: Template:Welcome-turnaround has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. PleaseStand (talk) 22:17, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination for deletion of [[Template:Welcome-turnaround]] 

message: This aim "welcoming committee members welcome new users who have already made constructive edits and help them get started in various ways. There are no requirements for joining us except a good attitude and a willingness to help newcomers get started on Wikipedia" seems to be unfair for some reasons. Here on Wikipedia, civility and help should remain the highest priority to keep maintaining the pedia. I believe every newbie should be welcomed. Reason: it will serve as an evidence that the editor was welcomed with links to know how where he/she enters is like. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 18:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes for the committee
Talk:Vinay Katiyar

message: I rewrote most of it. Forgot to log in though... Prater 18:17, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A lot of work has been done on this article since the clean-up tag was added last February, so I'm removing the tag. If you believe that the article should remain tag, please reinsert it and explain the reasons here. CLW 18:34, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up tag 

message: Hindi 2401:4900:5273:D2C3:0:24:6D0A:D701 (talk) 10:21, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hinhi
Talk:Avedis Zildjian Company

message: constantinople is fail name, correctly is Istanbul 146.4.52.226 (talk) 12:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: English-language usage didn't significantly start shifting until around 1929, so if the company's connections to the city are before that, it's not anachronistic. AnonMoos (talk) 16:33, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  constantinople is fail name, correctly is Istanbul
Talk:Upper half-plane

message: According to the article Half-space (geometry), a half-space can be either open or closed. The present article uses the definition corresponding to an open half-space. But according to Mathworld, the upper half plane includes the x-axis, making it a closed half-space. 
Since there is apparently no consensus on the meaning of the unqualified term "upper half-plane," the article ought to mention both definitions. Dratman (talk) 04:33, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open set or closed set? 
Talk:Farmer Giles of Ham

message: How do you pronounce "Giles"? --83.78.66.43 18:52, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The usual way, as far as I know. --Paul A 07:06, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think that in Latin, "Dives" is (or was) pronounced Deewess. Das Baz, aka Erudil 17:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dives

message: Glossing Giles's Latin name as "Aegis'd Bronze-beard Giles Farmer from Ham" misleadingly implies that the name Giles derives from Julius, when in fact it is the English form of Aegidius (see Saint Giles).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.170.169.245 (talk) 01:12, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Giles's Latin name 

message: I think that the Dragon's Tail and the Mock Dragon's Tail should have a mention on the page.Dour1234 (talk) 01:40, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, perhaps. Plot summaries are required to be short; and we should only mention details that are of significance, as demonstrated by the discussion in 'Analysis', for instance. If you know of a scholarly analysis that demonstrates the importance of the tail(s) then by all means go ahead, add and cite them along with the reason for mentioning them. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:47, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Dragon's Tail