Talk:Front for Victory

message: "The main opposition of the FPV from inside the PJ are the supporters of former presidents Eduardo Duhalde and Carlos Menem, many of whom have migrated to Kirchner's faction."
I'm totally confused as to what this sentence is supposed to mean. Aren't "the FPV" and "Kirchner's faction" the same thing? So who migrated, Duhalde and Menem? I doubt it. Unless someone clarifies this, I might delete "many of whom have migrated to Kirchner's faction", since it seems safe to assume that the people who still support those guys are the main opponents of the FPV. --Brian Z 02:56, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a difficult sentence. It should say something along the lines of "The main opposition are the remaining supporters..." and clarify that many supporters of Duhalde and Menem (that is, with the exception of the aforementioned remaining ones) have turned their backs of them and migrated to the FPV. I don't know how to express it any less clumsily, so be my guest. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 21:39, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I gave it a shot. --Brian Z 03:12, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

text: No, it's not. and please log in if you're going to make such bold claims.--Camilorojas (talk) 00:02, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify 

message: Who's the leader of the party? there's no info about it in the official site.--Camilorojas (talk) 13:25, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leadership 

message: There are two references that prove FPV is a center-left / left-wing party. READ THEM and the SPANISH VERSION!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.5.150.48 (talk) 20:52, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Miacek 

message: I disagree with the fact of having added the word "conservatism" to its ideology. Kirchnerism never defined itself that way, the reference is based on an opinion article which reflects the views only of the author. I propose, therefore, removing the concept. --Banfield - Threats here 10:38, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conservatism 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Front for Victory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121202044526/http://www.frenteparalavictoria.org/plataforma.php to http://www.frenteparalavictoria.org/plataforma.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Front for Victory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081120072502/http://www.greenleft.org.au/2007/731/37871 to http://www.greenleft.org.au/2007/731/37871
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:02, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Political spectrum of the Front for victory is center-left,https://www.lapoliticaonline.com/nota/nota-31196/
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/keeping-it-in-the-family-argentina-s-first-lady-sweeps-to-victory-a-514113.html http://www.redalyc.org/service/redalyc/downloadPdf/286/28671203/1not left wing.
For:Vif12vf
:What you fail to realize is that the Front for Victory was a coalition of three parties, two of which were left-wing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 21:19, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political spectrum of the Front for victory 

message: Please stop edit warring, you have reverted it 4 times in the last 24 hours which is a bannable offense. Per Wikipedia:Edit warring, I will try to solve it here before reporting you again. You were blocked one week before, and this time it might be a more lengthy ban. Using WP:OR sources will lead to reverts such as Vif12vd's reverts on you. You have already been blocked before, and engaging in reverts that also break WP:OR, will probably lead to an extended block period. Can any of your sources used be found in Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources, if none of them can, the sources cannot be verified and backed up, and it therefore breaks Wikipedia:No original research which is Wikipedia articles must not contain original research. The phrase "original research" (OR) is used on Wikipedia to refer to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist." You yourself state that you searched them up, which proves the point of WP:OR, if you cannot find sources that are counted as reliable on Wikipedia. This is the reason of reverts, failing to acknowledge this and further reverts will lead to a report.BastianMAT (talk) 13:27, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit warring