lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:American mystery writers

message: These two categories--"American crime fiction writers" and "American mystery writers"--define fields that are virtually synonymous in general parlance. There is already considerable overlap, with more than 50% of those listed as "American crime fiction writers" (29 out of 53) also listed as "American mystery writers." In almost every case beyond those currently overlapping, it is hard to see why a given writer qualifying for one list wouldn't qualify for the other. Merging the categories under either title would go far toward creating a comprehensive, nonconfusing list of American writers in the field. As for which title would be used for a merged category, while at present the "American mystery writers" list is much larger than the "American crime fiction writers" list, the primary article discussing the field is crime fiction, which is also the broader term. Best, Dan—DCGeist 19:50, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Case for merger
Talk:Mill Rock

message: I moved the following text here from the main article.  It seems to be editorial in nature, and questions the content of the article.  It does reference sources, although ones I do not have easy access to.  — Eoghanacht talk 19:50, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved editorial comments 

message: The size of the island is given as 8.6 acres.However, using a website that measure distances and area, it appears the island is more like 2.5 acres. Where is the claim for 8.6 acres based on? 
Tsivkregal (talk) 19:51, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size of Island possibly incorrect 

message: I'm having some trouble matching this article to various old maps available online. There's an app here that overlays a current map of NYC with one made by Joseph Colton in 1836 (s.a. ). That map has only one Mill Island, while according to this article and the NYC Parks source there were two, connected only decades later. Furthermore, using that app, it appears current shape of Mill Island seems to extend to what is on the old map labeled as "Flood Rock", while another charted "Hancock Rock" is neither mentioned in this article nor in the more in-depth Removal of Hell Gate rocks; there's also a "Middle Reef", but only indicated as hatching.
Yet another map from 1840 seems to agree with the Colton map about "Flood Rock", but has no "Hancock Rock", and shows more detail of "Middle Reef" as consisting of what I assume are distinct, submerged rocks, or shallows. I wonder if a name shift happened there at some point, identifying, maybe in retrospect, as "Little Mill Island" what was formerly known as "Flood Rock", while the blasting was carried out on the submerged "Middle Reef".  -- Theoprakt (talk) 19:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  identifying Flood Rock
Talk:Wharton, New Jersey

message: There seems to be some text missing from the History section, at the end of the second-to-last paragraph. The last paragraph in that section seems to be talking about who the town was named after, but a lot of that information seems to be missing as well. I couldn't make head-or-tail of it. —Wrathchild (talk) 19:51, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing text

message: There is an image on commons at :Image:S6300242.JPG.  Based on the description (in spanish), it may be Wharton.  Can anyone confirm if this does look like Wharton?  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 12:09, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible pic
Talk:2002 Pirelli Tower airplane crash

message: I am surprised by the differences in "facts" presented in the Italian and English versions.
64.118.103.121 (talk) 01:22, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What does this sentence mean: 'Suddenly the pilot left, leaving another aircraft saying, "No, they told you to land, not me!".' The pilot left what exactly? Peter Bell (talk) 06:46, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This is indeed confusing.  Also the quote itself is not substantiated by the citation given. I will be bold and strike this. Someone with better source can replace it.  Oswald Glinkmeyer (talk) 19:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The pilot left what?
Talk:Mount Hosmer (British Columbia)

message: Neil Peart's autobiography on p. 104, and the excerpt printed in 2003 Cycle World,  say that the postcard with the caption "Ghost Rider" was Three Sisters, presumably Three Sisters (Elk Valley). So is this blurb about him on the wrong article, or was he mistaken which mountain was shown, or does the nickname apply to both? — Brianhe (talk) 15:55, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neil Peart and Ghost Rider nickname 
Talk:Jumping the Scratch

message: Jumping the Scratch is a wonderful story about a boy that is really alone in the world. I think it is very interesting that he has a memory that he wants lost and then his aunt has a memory that is needed. Putting the neighborhood girl and Jamie in the laundry room with the soda machine was inspiring as they talked. It reminded me of when I flirted with boys when I was younger. It is a really great book for cat lovers like me because Jamie really did share his heart with his cat.
      Keep reading my blog for different books
              the anomynous reader
Categorizing article - You can help! Leaptad (talk) 21:21, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jumping the Scratch
Talk:Tone (literature)

message: Moved it to Tone (literature). 
See Google hits:
**Tone (fiction) 1,030,000 hits
** Tone (literature) 1,260,000 hits
--Boguslav (talk) 05:10, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: The article repeatedly states that tone and mood are not the same thing, but fails to differentiate between the two and even uses the word, "mood" to describe "tone".  It requires editing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Foljiny (talk • contribs) 18:29, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone Vs. Mood

message: I agree this "tone-mood" issue is a problem.  I clarified it to some degree, but a more creditable source is needed then the one provided for mood.  There should also perhaps be some examples of tone in a piece, shifting tone, and/or tone verses mood.Mja700 (talk) 02:33, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone Vs. Mood (confusion addressed)

message: Can you link the connection between this article and spanish article http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tono_(literatura) ?
I don't have enough permissions on wikidata to do this. :/ 201.216.12.182 (talk) 19:29, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tono literatura 

message: The page at: http://www.literarydevices.com/tone/ provides an excellent treatment of the topic of tone. Perhaps this can be included as a reference, and additional material can be adapted from it and included in the article. Thanks! --Lbeaumont (talk) 17:28, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggesting the Literary devices page as a good additional source and reference
Talk:TriBBS

message: There is a bias tone on this article.  It needs cleanup.  We cannot have people complain that current owners are doing nothing.  Lack of development once, but repeated over and over again seems ludicrous. --Jbanning22 17:52, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias

message: I've rewritten/wikified this article.  Mostly it was cleanup, but I've removed most of the repetitious notes about the lack of development, too. Sliver7 (talk) 14:35, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite/Wikification
Talk:Byzantine Armenia

message: Can anybody please write for when constant attacks by Byzantium to Armenia to ensure direct control of Armenia, turned Armenia in a wasteland or something?
http://www.allempires.com/article/index.php?q=manzikert
I'm not affiliated with this site in any way, BTW.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.53.7.110 (talk) 19:16, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armenia
Talk:UEFA Euro 2008 qualifying Group C

message: –Türkiye bu gruptan alnının akıyla birinci olarak çıkacak ve tüm dünyayaya Türkiye'nin üzerinde oynanan çirkin oyunlara da güzel bir cevap vermiş olacaktır. İkinci olacak olan takım ise Yunanistan gibi görünse de bence Norveç'in avantajı daha büyük. 
Türkiye'ye kalan maçlarında başarılar diliyorum. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Flag_of_Turkey.svg
malta gave greece a hard time this evenning.greece won the game with a solitary goal scored in the 2nd half from a doubtful penalty.
the maltese also withstood the reigning champions with ten men for the last thirty mins.our next game will be against bosnia and await both turkey and norway at home. good luck malta213.217.235.206 02:16, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

message: How is it that bosnia may be eliminated after the next mach day, i understand that if Bosnia loses to 
greece that means that they can only grab second spot.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.104.125.55 (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bosina elimination??? 

message: What's wrong with the score-table - the column of Moldova? Can anyone fix it? - Sthenel 21:30, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't appear to be anything wrong with it. F9T 16:42, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Nothing wrong again? - Sthenel 21:09, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Score-table
Talk:Young People's Christian Union

message: From Google Books ObiterDicta ( pleadings • errata • appeals ) 16:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for expansion

message: I removed "Y.P.C.U. was already established by 1896 as I have a vintage ribbon with pin saying Y.P.C.U. Convention (then logo of C and U intertwined) Omaha 1896". This should be worked out on the talk page, instead of posting contradictory claims in the article. Chris the speller (talk) 21:35, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment removed from article - settle the founding date here 

message: I have found an article from WATERTOWN TIMES, SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 18.. 1893:
Miss Marion Libby, daughter of Rev.
Mr. Libby, gave an address on "Hints and
Helps In Junior Endeavor Work" at the
meeting of the Y. P. C. U. at Fort Plain,
N. Y., Wednesday afternoon.
So Y.P.C.U must be established prior to this date.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Klaus E (talk • contribs) 11:39, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founding date
Talk:Vršac Castle

message: The Vršac fortress was first mentioned in 1343 as Érsomlyó. In this time Louis I of Hungary was the king and it was a royal fortress. You can find the part of the truth here. Panonian, please don't write stupidities. Bendeguz 20:14, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The source that you provided do not mention this what you claim, please provide some relevant sources. According to my source (Dušan Belča, Mala istorija Vršca, Vršac, 1997.), Turkish traveler, Evliya Çelebi, wrote that the fortress was built by the Serbian despot Đurađ Branković. PANONIAN (talk) 21:05, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

text: And my source (listed in the article) claim exactly what you deleted from the article. Please do not delete things that you do not like - both theories could be here, right? PANONIAN (talk) 02:02, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Wilhelm Fabry

message: I am a citizen of Fabry's birthtown. I have checked details and added some (e.g. the picture of his bust). If there are any details I could help with, I'll try. But although I am quite good in English, I don't want to "fill up" the English article by translating the German one. I think this should be done by someone who is a native English speaker and proficient in German, not vice versa. --Kauko56 20:17, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Improving / verifying
Talk:Burn the Witch (Queens of the Stone Age song)

message: The Sound On Sound quote is talking about the song "Like a Drug", which doesn't appear on this single. I'll be removing that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.174.92.206 (talk) 23:26, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Quote is for a different song
Talk:Rauschpfeife

message: Rauschen seems to mean "hiss" or "rustle" in German, yet this instrument is said to be louder than a crumhorn. I'm trying to figure out why it has its name, or what's the best translation of "rauschen" to describe this instrument. Apparently the sound in the overblowing range is very unique, which may be where the "rausch" comes in.  Maybe the best translation is "noise pipe"?
--Sonjaaa 20:22, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Grove the name comes from "medieval Ger. rusch, also Middle High Ger. rus: ‘reed’, ‘cane’, and pfeife: ‘pipe’", so it makes sense that in Modern German Rausch means rustle, but in old German it meant reed. Mak (talk) 21:07, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: why its name?

message: Since the name is so very clearly a German one, should not the plural form 'rauschpfeifen' be used ?77.96.58.212 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 18:19, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plural form 

message: :
Would any meaning be lost if this were condensed to  ? —Tamfang (talk) 06:15, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  things and names
Talk:D. P. Chattopadhyaya

message: Hello Lszl, I put the disambiguation template because both names D. P. Chattopadhyaya and Debiprasad Chattopadhyaya are alternatively used for both persons.Kumarilabhatta 20:24, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Surface reconstruction

message: Would be nice to have a picture qualitatively illustrating the unit cell of the reconstructed surface, its orientation w.r.t. unreconstructed surface layer, and atomic shifts (if any dimerization occurs). The notations like 2x1 are quite cryptic, since it is not clear what the chosen units/axes are (esp. for 111 surfaces). This would be particularly useful for the Si section where no illustration is given at all!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.104.156.31 (talk) 18:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Figures needed to illustrate the examples 

message: The first example (silicon) is quite technical with jargon. Fun to read, but still. 178.38.90.114 (talk) 06:51, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Technical
Talk:Taylor–Couette flow

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI!  16:40, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Tension (physics)

message: This article has overlapping content with other pages and work is needed to identify where and how overlapping topics are addressed differently on these pages and how/where/whether they reference each other. 
*Compression_%28physics%29 
*Strength_of_materials
*Continuum_mechanics
*Stress_%28mechanics%29 
*Strain_%28mechanics%29 
*Compressive_strength
*Tensile_strength
Sustain4people (talk) 14:15, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship to Other Articles

message: This article is a lot of blaa. Where is definition?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.146.96.48 (talk) 16:05, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  T = W + ma? 

message: The page on tension requires units of measurement  N/m 
It would also be useful to indicate that in some circumstances - such as in the determination of plate vibration characteristics (for example, analysis by Timoshenko) it is more appropriate to use tensile stress with units of N/m^2 
In a microphone diaphragm - the "tension" or stress in the diaphragm can be characterised by both tension N/m or tensile stress N/m^2 
From a measurement point of view it is practical to measure the diaphragm tension N/m
From an analysis point of view it is useful to use the units N/m^2 
It is also worth pointing out that tensile stress and Pressure (distributed over a diaphragm surface) both use the units N/m^2
georgerai at hotmail dot com
The magnitude of the force of tension typically increases with the amount of stretching. For small stretching, the force is often described by Hooke's law.
If this means that the amount of stretch usually increases with tension, than we should change it to say that.  I think this is confusing.69.122.62.231 (talk) 21:52, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tension - units of measurement 

message: The main picture at the top right mislabels the force of the scaffolding acting on the earth and vice versa.
Also, the last paragraph in "System under net force" needs to be rewritten. The second to last sentence states, "If body A has greater mass than body B, m_1 > m_2." A sentence fragment if I've ever seen it. It's also a little unclear how that was supposed to tie into the last sentence which begins with a, "Therefore," which does makes sense if placed after the third to last sentence setting up the forces used in that last sentence. Then the fragment could either be placed at the end and expanded/finished or removed. I hate to simply remove it because it is beginning a good thought.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rical Jasan (talk • contribs) 01:23, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors in page 

message: — Assignment last updated by Kmijares (talk) 22:40, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: 4A Wikipedia Assignment
Talk:Test theory

message: This article has been unsourced since 2005.  Apart from the material at Test theories of special relativity, I find one 1997 dissertation on the topic.  There is also the unrelated Classical test theory.  I'm inclined to turn this into a WP:Disambiguation page of those two pages.  Page creator  is still occasionally active, perhaps they can comment? power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Convert to DAB
Talk:Thermal transmittance

message: Perhaps I have done the calculation wrong, but I calculate the transmittance of 4mm single-glazed glass to be about 260 W/m^2K.
The calculation is as: 1.05 W/mK http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/thermal-conductivity-d_429.html × 0.004 m = 262.5 W/m^2K.
Have I made a mistake?  This is very different from the 5 W/m^2K shown in the article.  That would be a pane of glass about 20 cm thick, wouldn't it?  1.05 W/mK ÷ 5 W/m^2K = 0.21 m
Regardless, none of the sources point to where these values came from.
Cheers!
Prymal (talk) 16:45, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't do any calculations myself, but I agree that these values need citations. I found this document that more or less agrees with the values in the article though: Default U-values Mariusoei (talk) 07:42, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typical Thermal Transmittance Values 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orders of magnitude (thermal transmittance). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Utopes (talk / cont) 23:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Orders of magnitude (thermal transmittance)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Watt per square metre-Kelvin. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Utopes (talk / cont) 23:39, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Watt per square metre-Kelvin" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: So in one spot, the article uses λ-value as "W/mK", and in another spot it uses U-value as "W/m^2*K", which one is it? i've never seen thermal conductivity written as "W/mK" except for in these structural/architectural data sheets, and my spidey senses are telling me that either 1 it's not clear on this page or 2 the entire industry doesn't understand thermal units of conductivity (since what you're measuring isn't per the width of the material, it's per the area (unless you're doing a proof of concept for a material, in which i could imagine it as per volume, which could be simplified as "per width" but just seems unnecessarily jargon-y)). also i don't see why you would need to even write λ in the table?? like more questions than answers over here
basically, i'm asking someone with the industry knowledge to just run through and clear this up/explain it for us plebs - Acetoe (talk) 03:42, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  U-value vs λ-value
Talk:Thermal velocity

message: The article gives six different ways to figure the thermal velocity, and then a table.  It doesn't indicate which of the six is used in the table. Gah4 (talk) 23:06, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  which? 

message: I think it should be made clear that thermal velocity does not lead to macroscopic motion, as one could expect when seeing non-zero velocities due to temperature. Instead, the velocities are in random directions and cancel out on average. This is already alluded to by mentioning the difference between speed and velocity and could be explained there (by someone who can formulate it more rigorously than me).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.24.136.178 (talk) 09:05, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make clear that thermal velocity does not lead to macroscopic motion 

message: What is meant by "width of the peak in the Maxwell–Boltzmann particle velocity distribution"? Width at what height? 90% of the peak height? Something else? Or does it just mean to convey that the peak shape is qualitatively getting broader/flatter with higher temperatures? 145.40.208.28 (talk) 22:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Width of the peak?
Talk:Thermodynamic beta

message: what is S here on the page? it's undefined
:S = k \ln \Omega, \,  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.16.123.194 (talk) 16:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: S is entropy, and it is defined as k \ln \Omega. False vacuum (talk) 10:23, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  what? 

message: I recall being taught reciprocal temperature – as a more fundamental expression of the physics of matter – way back in the late 1950 in undergrad courses.
 We were taught not only the points in this article, but also the advantages of complex temperatures and their reciprocals in several fields of application.
Perhaps somebody can provide more of the uses, and advantages of reciprocals, negative and complex temperatures as discussed beyond the cites here.
 Is this article a promotion of one school of thought, sprung in full panoply from the forehead of a recent Zeus?
GreggEdwards (talk) 18:57, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  When?