Talk:Augie Auer

message: Nothing obviously notable here. Please flesh out, or I'll suspect its just been created for listing, in which case I will AFD it William M. Connolley 18:03, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable 

message: The text in the reference states:
This is apparently used to document that:
But that isn't what the text is saying. It merely states that the EPA requires one of two methods: 1) based on land-type 2) based on population.
The Document then states that it will use #1 - and specifically it will use Auer's method to comply with #1.
So: No where is there a reference to the EPA  using Auer's method. 
I've changed the text so that it references reality - and removes the WP:OR --Kim D. Petersen 21:49, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok - this seems to have been corrected with a direct quote to the EPA. --Kim D. Petersen 22:55, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The direct quote is not to the EPA, but to a Jamaican agency. The article as it stood some time earlier today claimed usage by the EPA but used the Jamaican report as a source for that usage. KimDabelsteinPetersen noticed the problem and corrected it, keeping the source but correctly naming the agency it came from as Jamaican rather than the EPA. I found several sources indicating usage by the EPA and added the EPA claim back in with what I felt to be the clearest of those sources, the Federal Register article. I don't see what you mean about this failing to document the claim: the claim is that the EPA uses his methods, and the article is an EPA document saying to use his methods. One can also find EPA documents on specific projects that actually do use his methods, rather than just saying that his methods should be used, but they are less general. At some point William M. Connolley reverted the article to an old state with the badly-sourced EPA claim, which I then un-reverted – is his reversion what you mean when you say "this seems to have been corrected"?. —David Eppstein 23:33, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I meant correct - in that it now has a link to an EPA guideline suggesting its use. So now the text is correct in asserting that the EPA uses this. --Kim D. Petersen 00:25, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  EPA and WP:OR 

message: I notice that full professors are almost always held to be notable  at AfD, so this certainly is not in the least incontestably NN, and therefore not appropriate for a speedy. There are undoubtedly sources to be found for his publications etc. As I am not the author, i can remove the tag, and I have just done so.  DGG 22:03, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry. I didnt realize this was at AfD, not speedy, so I will defend it there. Apologies for any confusion DGG 22:07, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. That was indeed very confusing William M. Connolley 22:10, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Full professors

message: It is number 7 at the bottom.  I'm curious about the article.  Such a measure, surely shows this person is notable.--Africangenesis 04:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I found this link, but I am not quite sure how bottom notes are supposed to work , please assist.--Africangenesis 04:15, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the link before seeing your note. The short answer to your how-to question is: surround the story title in the brackets you would use for a link, then put the link itself inside the brackets before the title, separated by a space. Like [htp://www.nzherald.co.nz/category/story.cfm?c_id=26&objectid=10416137 Metservice keen...], but with http spelled correctly. It can go where the unlinked title is, inside the <ref> tags earlier in the article. —David Eppstein 04:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is the ref and reflist part I did not understand, but I have learned from your example.  I had no idea the links were in the text and the reflist was formed automatically -- thanx.--Africangenesis 04:36, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "keen to leave augie ..." link is broken 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Augie Auer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070521083708/http://www.speakers.co.nz/augieauer.html to http://www.speakers.co.nz/augieauer.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070616124307/http://www.nrca.org/regulations/air-ambient-guideline-2006.pdf to http://www.nrca.org/regulations/air-ambient-guideline-2006.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.stuff.co.nz/4091347a10.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070502012940/http://www.nzcpd.com/guest43.htm to http://www.nzcpd.com/guest43.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:30, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified