lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tom Ewell

message: As per Wikipedia is not a collection of lists, I have reduced the "Filmography" section to just the films that have Wiki articles, and renamed it to "Selected filmography" ... people can click the IMDb External link at the end of the article to see the subject's full filmography with links to information about each of their films.
I have also used 19xx tags for the years of the films, something that Some Other Editors do not appear to understand, since they seem to think that just linking 19xx somehow has encyclopedic value.
Anonymous edits without comments may be reverted by anyone.
I am placing this boilerplate message on this Discussion page before I actually make the changes, so that I can just put "see Discussion page" in the edit summary, and hopefully not have my edit summarily reverted as vandalism by Some Other Editor.
Happy Editing! -- 10:23, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After posting the above, I decided to simply revert the addition of the list with an UNDO. —68.239.79.82 10:29, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selected filmography 

message: If an editor wants to add it, this was just one obit source that mentions his wife and their son Taylor:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/1994/09/14/actor-tom-ewell-dies/fa76bf87-5f90-4256-8d73-d2ac775f84cc/
2601:482:4200:56E0:12A:7147:FF4C:5C93 (talk) 23:20, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding “citation needed” under Personal Life
Talk:Carl Großmann

message: i think there's a mistake in the title because in the article it says his last name is grossman not grossmann.
--unsigned by [[user:Minadown] at 02:52, 18 June 2006
: OK, I'll change it then. -- Shadowolf 10:10, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, by the way: There is a police picture included in the German article, writing "Carl Großmann" with two n and ß. I think that's quite a hint to the correct spelling. -- marilyn.hanson 08:37, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Somebody needs to put this article in English. Right now it's in German with English words, and I can't make much sense out of it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.33.158.121 (talk) 10:29, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:List of Sailor Moon characters

message: I heard that the Makaiju page was redirected to the List of minor Sailor Moon characters page. If it wasn't, I would've considered placing the info on the Cardians there like I did with the MOTDs of the other pages. Rtkat3 (talk) 9:23, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Makaiju 

message: yaten betuful name ja  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.14.105.42 (talk) 13:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  yaten 

message: In Inside Out, a character named Jill Andersen it's voiced by Diane Lane. Unlike Ikuko Tsukino, she is very kind and motherly, acting as the support center for her family when they get through tough times, like moving to San Francisco. There are times when she isn't patient with her husband because of his oblivious personality (believing she shouldn't have turned down her chance to marry a handsome Brazilian copter pilot), but she still loves him. She also loves Riley and does her best to understand Riley, especially as their move negatively affects Riley's personality. Since Sadness seems to be the leader of her emotions (but is not a weeping mess like Riley's Sadness), it is possible this is where her understanding and compassionate nature comes from as sadness represents the ability to empathize with others or that she might've had a rough past. She has fair skin, brown eyes (instead of blue), noticeably wide hips and stout posterior, and long brown hair (instead of blue), usually in a low ponytail. She wears red-framed glasses and likes to wear long-sleeved shirts and sweaters. 187.255.222.126 (talk) 22:40, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  August 23, 2022
Talk:Size Small

message: Since IPs sometimes get edits automatically reverted, I made two key changes to the article: first, the first broadcast on STV Saskatchewan in 1987 was not Size Small. A new network would not debut with something like that. Lumby hosted a 30-minute special to introduce the network, which then continued with prime time programming (I believe it was a movie, but I cannot locate a TV listing from 1987 to confirm title). I still think it's worth mentioning the special here as it indicates that Lumby and Size Small were considered major properties by STV if she was given the job of introducing the stations. Second, someone added a rather general, unsourced statement saying Size Small isn't airing anywhere in 2012; such a statement would need a source to indicate that no broadcaster on the planet is currently showing it. How do we know some obscure station in the Middle East isn't showing bootleg tapes of the thing? (I'm not being completely facetious here - iconic series Stampede Wrestling had this happen). If there's a source - say an interview with one of the Lumbys - confirming no broadcasts, then please add it. 70.72.211.35 (talk) 13:38, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes
Talk:The Queen of Spades (opera)

message: These 2007 notes --now four subsections 1.1 to 1.4-- pertain to the article title (page name). See also Talk:Queen of spades and Talk:Queen of spades (disambiguation). --P64 (talk) 18:08, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course.  Fireplace 16:14, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: (old talk)

message: The Queen of Spades redirects here... why not have that as the main article? Fireplace 01:11, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title page 

message: Why the hell The Queen of Spades redirects here? The story by Pushkin doesn't even have it's own article? How can it be? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.94.147.197 (talk) 20:55, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?!

message: I have reverted some vandalism and changed names where they are not as listed on the BBC web site .  Springnuts 22:52, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of names 

message: Acording to all guidelines I've seen (WP:NAME, etc), a title like this is only needed if there's a base article as well. That plus the fact that the redirect leads to here, prompts me to wish to move this to The Queen of Spades. Any objections? ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 12:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course.  Fireplace 16:14, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: There is an opera/operetta with the same name by Suppe: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_von_Supp%C3%A9#List_of_works
Here is a listing of the tracks from a CD of the opera: http://www.allmusic.com/album/release/franz-von-supp%C3%A9-pique-dame-mr0002865864
Does anyone know enough about this opera to create page for it, and a disambiguation page to differentiate from the opera by Tchaikovsky.  
Kuncherto (talk) 22:05, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, Kuncherto. I've created a stub with enough references for expansion at Pique Dame (Suppé). I put disambiguating hatnotes on it and on the article for Tchaikovsky's opera. It is also listed at Queen of spades (disambiguation). The German Wikipedia article has quite a lot of information, but is rather poorly referenced with no inline citations. Voceditenore (talk) 13:32, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about Pique Dame (Queen of Spades) by Franz von Suppe
Talk:Rutlish School

message: Neville Heath was mentioned as an old boy when I was at school, although by then (late 50's) the details of his crime were not well enough remembered for salacious gossip. Others also have him down as a Rutlishian ("Villains' paradise": a history of Britain's underworld By Donald Thomas). I have tentatively added him back.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThePopes (talk • contribs) 20:39, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Neville Heath and Rutlish

message: This article may lack verifying sources but it is very accurate and very good.  I was at Rutlish too (1972-77) and so I have some personal experience.  Incidentally there was also a school cap and even a school boater a bit before my time.
I was a pupil at the school in the 1970s and there is an error in the article. The transitus common room was indeed located on the ground floor of the main block, but the sixth form one was on the first floor of the Manor House.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C6:F088:601:F1DC:356E:EB0B:CE59 (talk) 20:54, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  article quality 

message: I see that Neville Heath has once again added and removed as an old boy of Rutlish. I previously removed him back in 2006 when it was also incorrectly claimed he was the "Brides in the Bath" murderer (actually George Joseph Smith). At the time I couldn't find any evidence that Heath went to Rutlish (he was born in Ilford) so deleted the entry. As a former pupil of Rutlish, I remember no mention of Heath as a old boy, which I'm sure would have been a topic of salacious and scandalous discussion had he been.--DavidCane (talk) 10:32, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Neville Heath was unlikely to have been an old boy

message: "Single-sex boys" conjured up some wondering about other kinds.--SilasW (talk) 14:04, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No young freaks 

message: In the 1990s when I was there you arrived to be in the "2nd year". Then went through 3rd 4th and 5th years until possibly going to 6th form. There were no names for the years as mentioned here. Perhaps they were used in previous decades?
Subsequently the National Curriculum years started to be used more, even more so when Merton changed back to a two tier system and the 6th form was lost.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbuller (talk • contribs) 22:28, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year names
Talk:Martha M. Place

message: According to The Marion Daily Star newspaper, she was executed on March 20. "Mrs. Martha Place was successfully electrocuted in the prison (Sing Sing) here at 11:01 a.m. today. It was pronounced the best execution that ever occurred here, and Dr. Harvey the prison physician, said death was instantaneous." Source, here, includes PDF scans of local newspapers covering the event. This contradicts The History Channel's This Day in History  Jerkcity 01:19, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article says "the first of 26 women (including one juvenile)". A juvenile can not be a woman but might be a girl. Could the author please clarify what is meant? Alpheus 19:09, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One of the WOMEN was a juvenile. Learn to read English correctly. 
63.26.213.96 (talk) 03:09, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Juveniles

message: "She married a man named Wesley Savacool, but she abandoned him after giving birth to their son, Ross Savacool." Next Sentence: "Wesley left when Ross was three" - does not make sense. So did she leave the father right after birth, or did the father leave when the child was three? 2A02:8108:2C3F:AC2C:4CB5:F433:A407:EAB (talk) 10:48, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background
Talk:Sherrod E. Skinner Jr.

message: A fine start, and I thank you for arranging the Medal of Honor citation according to the format seemingly preferred by the majority of articles. What is "The Hook"? This should be explained or at least wikilinked in anticipation of a further explanation in a separate article. LordAmeth 16:52, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WPMILHIST Assessment
Talk:Alicel, Oregon

message: I'm new to adding images to wikipedia articles, but I think it might be nice to get permission to use this photo:  Katr67 01:20, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  photo 

message: On Find a Grave--for follow-up research. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/40610092/charles-w-ladd Valfontis (talk) 08:05, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Charles W Ladd
Talk:Kiss Kiss (book)

message: I have placed merge (here) tags on the stories in this book, most are unreferenced and may have issues meeting WP:N as stand alone articles. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:35, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I am against merging as there are such a lot of stand alone articles of this kind, and the stories are worth describing this way. The Wiki ghost (talk) 10:43, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

text: Oppose If you merge them, then the :Template:Kiss Kiss stories will be useless, and they are completely different things (a book and a short story).Timothy Gu (talk) 01:53, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

text: Oppose. It's in my understanding that most of these short stories were published as separate writings and then compiled together to form this book. Kind of like the Bible.  Since consensus thus far is opposition to merger, I'll archive this discussion and remove merger tags. ComfyKem (talk) 03:48, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Galgrease

message: I have never heard or seen this terms anywhere, ever, either in terms of Shirow's books or in any other context.  Citation, please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snarfies (talk • contribs) 01:32, 18 June 2006‎ (UTC)
:If you're not familiar with the name 'Galgrease', then you're not familiar with the works. It's the name of the product, therefore a proper noun, not a neologism. After a quick googling, I found: http://www.motorballer.org/shirow/poster.html A Google image search will show many title works and adverts using the name. - JeffJonez (talk) 04:50, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neologism?
Talk:Phantasy Star Online ver.2

message: Is the Schthack server in some how encouraged by Sega so that it can be called "official" ?213.157.1.156 04:54, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the hell does "Official Private" mean? 
Talk:National Telecommunications and Information Administration – 1978

message: There's a metric ton and a half of RS coverage and some 180K ghits, but I don't want to dig through them to figure out what's notable v. news at 2 AM. It's here for whoever comes by next TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 06:18, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing 

message: Is it still current; if so does it need 1978 in the title? Hugo999 (talk) 00:48, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 
Talk:Burning Rangers

message: Is there a reason this article lacks a plot summary? Brutannica (talk) 16:27, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The game doesn't have a narrative and was impossible to create a section on one. JAGUAR  16:44, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Erm, I can only assume that Jaguar has Burning Rangers confused with a completely different game; otherwise his comment here is quite inexplicable. Anyway, there's an easy solution when an article is missing something: WP:Be Bold and add it, as another editor has since done with regard to this article's plot summary.--Martin IIIa (talk) 01:51, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: For a featured article on a Japanese developed game I expected information on the Japanese reception. Currently the article only has 1 Japanese review listed with mention about the analogue pad. Mika1h (talk) 21:56, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Japanese reception 

message: * https://www.timeextension.com/news/2023/06/sonic-boss-doesnt-rule-out-possibility-of-a-new-burning-rangers-or-nights-game
Sergecross73 msg me 23:37, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source
Talk:The New York Review of Books

message: In the "Critical reaction" section an editor added a paragraph about a letter to the magazine in 2001. It is clearly a good faith addition, but it doesn't seem to me to be appropriate: the section is about the international reputation of the magazine, and it is surely disproportionate to single out a one-off instance of one person taking issue with a book review. There must have been hundreds of such cases over the years. I have removed it (commented out) for now, but would welcome comments here for or against restoring it. Tim riley talk 08:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with User:Tim riley.  In the more than half century of the Review, there have been numerous letters complaining about one or another viewpoint taken by writers in its pages, just as would be the case with essentially all publications that contain essays and other opinion pieces.  To mention this one instance would not only be an WP:UNDUE (WP:BALASP) addition, but it would be an invitation to begin to accumulate numerous similar instances, -- Ssilvers (talk) 13:53, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the two editors above; it would be unreasonable and unnecessary to single out one letter out of the hundreds or thousands that must have been received. Jack1956 (talk) 14:03, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree also, and see the consensus, have removed it.  DGG ( talk ) 06:26, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  2001 letter
Talk:San Cristóbal Volcano

message: If you remove the list of activity reports, this article is (in my opinion) way too short and lacking in info to be a good article.  The article says, for instance, that it's the youngest volcano in the San Cristóbal complex.  But it doesn't say how old it actually is.
This article is basically a stub at this point.  There must be more information available to help add to the article.  --cholmes75 (chit chat) 04:37, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure there is. I've been needing to go to the Library anyway...--ryos 17:59, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length 

message: After a trip to the library, I couldn't find what I needed. I'm going to have to wait until I return to school in the fall, and have access to a much more extensive library, in order to flesh out this article.--ryos 03:48, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing <nowiki>{{GAnominee}}</nowiki>

message: The Global Volcanism Program's List of Data Sources is probably a good place to start the hunt for more info. I couldn't find any of these at the local library, and will have to wait 'till I return to school in the fall to see if I can find them. In the mean time, should anyone take interest, I leave this to help you on your way.--ryos 04:00, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources of Information

message: Please remember to check, for what little there is there are some interesting typos (which I corrected).  I am also adding this as a wikiproject volcano page... as it is an article about a volcano. Snoop0x7b 05:32, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: The link for the Global Volcanism Program's website goes to the entry for Krakatau, not this volcano. ZFT (talk) 06:06, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong GVP entry
Talk:Motivations for organic agriculture

message: Two articles, Organic food and Organic agriculture both contain large sections that list arguments for and against buying and growing organic food. To remove the large redundancy, I've created this new article. Hopefully this article can successfully combine text from both pages, so that we may shrink the size of the two source articles to be just summaries of what is contained here.
Oh, and a page like this is not without precedent, see for example
:Category:Comparisons, :Category:Controversies, :Category:Criticisms, or :Category:Debates. (This article could perhaps be a comparison of conventional and organic agriculture.) JabberWok 01:51, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't disagree, but I think this article would need a name change (not sure what would work) if it were to include both sides (the title is "Motivations..." and it could give a false sense of weight towards one side of the arguement. Merging would help shorten the main organic farming article to a more managable length, and remove a fork at the same time. Radagast83 04:13, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Over at Talk:Organic food#Motivations for organic agriculture there is a discussion which affects this article. I have suggested a merge, but all comments are welcome over at the organic food talkpage. bobrayner (talk) 00:01, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: done.  this article was really terrible -- mostly unsourced essay and what was not, was duplicative.Jytdog (talk) 03:13, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge, smerge
Talk:Alan Silvestri

message: For example, winning an award for composing Chicken Run. He didn't even compose Chicken Run, this was Harry-Gregson Williams. Have made some changes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Szico VII (talk • contribs) 09:46, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Some major factual errors here

message: Alan Silvestri, one of the most notable film composers in America, a STUB?!?!?! (goes home and cries) ;) this needs expanding; I'll do this myself if I have to. Ben Tibbetts 01:53, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There, well that's a bit better. I can sleep now. Still needs expansion though. Ben Tibbetts 01:03, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Please expand

message: "eclectic use of different notes and instruments" - haha a bit like most other composers in history, in fact. Bob talk 23:20, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "eclectic use of different notes and instruments" 
Template talk:Ireland-hist-stub

message: Hi,
I wonder if the shamrock is the best symbol for Irish history articles? I'm not sure exactly what it symbolises, but it's possible that many (such as unionists) believe it might be too restrictive. Is there a better symbol for Ireland that can be said to be more inclusive? Maybe the shamrock is that symbol, but I'm just curious. I want to make sure this template can be added to any Irish history article without any controversy. Aaron McDaid (talk - contribs)  11:31, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  use of the shamrock for Irish history articles?
Talk:OPAL (software)

message: I'm one of the developer of OPAL, though not one of the original ones. I think the following line in the article can be improved: "[OPAL] was originally built off of ODE, but can run off of multiple engines now". The quote is not quite right. The OPAL at the moment consists of two layers: one abstract OPAL layer, and another ODE backend that implements the abstract layer. So, it's true that one could write another backend, thus allowing to use other engines other than ODE. There have been a few attempts to write such backends. I'm one of them (backend for TrueAxis physics engine). However I'm not aware of any such backend been completed. Therefore, one cannot state that one can run off multiple engines right now. It's more correct to state that one could write or complete existing backend in order to provide support for more engines. I will wait for any responses for a week, after that I will go ahead and clarify this point in the article. Oleksandr 02:06, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Response should be fixed now? ---Aboeing 10:20, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification
Talk:Japanese raiders in the Indian Ocean

message: As indicated by the tag at the top of the article, this needs clean-up in general. The introduction needs to be better organized and better separated from the rest of the text; the text needs to be better organized and better phrased in general, overall. And something at the bottom - references, see also, external links, maybe some kind of nav template to other elements of the naval aspect of the Pacific War, if such a thing exists. LordAmeth 11:17, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MilHist Assessment

message: The title of this article is 'Japanese raiders in Indian Ocean Campaign' but a large chunk of prose concerns an action that took place in the Pacific Ocean (my emphasis and italics). Indeed, the Indian Ocean is barely mentioned. Also, the 'Last Japanese raiding action' section occupies a disproportinate percentage of this offering. There are many other 'rooms' for improvement; e.g. the introduction (see above) seems to have disappeared altogether, so I have scribbled a quick sentence or two as a temporary replacement. I think a major re-name/sort-out is in order, but it probably needs a reference to hand. What do others think?
RASAM (talk) 20:49, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be best to focus the article on Japanese raiding and submarine operations in the Indian Ocean. The article needs an awful lot of work. Nick-D (talk) 10:39, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I would suggest to splice off the last raiding action section into another article leaving only a breif summary here.XavierGreen (talk) 01:51, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-name/sort-out