Talk:Weston-super-Mare

message: I've been watching this with amusement - and I guess it is the sort of thing Wikipedia contributors are 'never going to see eye-to-eye on.
As I see it a sea-life centre is a generic (and lower case !) term that describes a whole group of commercial ventures and by far the most appropriate term for an encyclopedia. Similarly I would say vacuum cleaner rather than Hoover.
Sure the previous owners did I think call it the Sea-life Centre (Upper case though !)
Johnrcrellin 15:45, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - the current solution works for me! CLW 21:32, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SeaQuarium / sea-life centre 

message: At the moment the article seems a little jumbled and I think it could do with some sub headings and a bit more structure. does anyone agree or have suggestions for sections it could be divided into? Basement12 15:33, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sub headings

message: I thought the last couple of paragraphs needed amplification. Plus, I'm afraid it's a myth we all cling to here in Weston but the second largest tidal range tag is factually inaccurate. I am not even sure it is third as I am sure I read that there is another high(er) range somewhere in China but cannot trace the reference at the moment.
Johnrcrellin 19:42, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tidal range and mud 

message: I live in Weston and have never heard any mention of this project. As it is not cited, I feel that it is most likely vandalism. Unless someone has any further info on it, I'm going to remove it. I'll look into it with other residents as well.  22:50, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  20,000 all seater stadium 

message: I assume the loss of the History section was not intended by any serious editor of this page? Silliness on this article seems to be spinning out of control. I have re-instated it. Johnrcrellin 07:48, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was me :-), I wasn't sure you were joking or being serious, Pahari Sahib (talk) 20:59, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent changes 

message: I cannot quite understand the reluctance to state in the piece the undoubted fact that, for most of its existence, Weston-super-Mare was in Somerset. POV I know - but Avon surely will soon be seen as a (regrettable) blip in history ? Leaving that aside the fact that the town was originally in Somerset and is now in an authority described as "North Somerset" are the important points. Look at old maps and I think you will see that present BANES, North Somerset and Bristol south of the Avon were indeed "North Somerset" as a division of the county. And to make it worse botanists still have a "North Somerset" that extends further south. Johnrcrellin 12:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historic(al) Somerset 

message: It should mention that weston is still in the (Ceremonial) county of Somerset Blackwave...... (talk) 19:28, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ceremonial county is mentioned in the infobox so it is reasonable that it should also be mentioned in the body of the article. However it isn't reasonable to simply remove North Somerset from the article - hence my reversion of your edit. --Cheesy Mike (talk) 20:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Somerset 

message: Maybe the wording needs improving. (As shown by recent revision attempt that completely missed the point.) The way tides work they have the highest RANGE at the same time of day each cycle (I didn't know this until I moved to Weston and observed it for myself.) So when it is high tide at say 12.00 midday it is never VERY high and because the beach is so shallow, changing to mud as you go out, the visitor does not get to see the sea much during their day. If you stay overnight when high tide is at say 8.00 am then you get to see the sea right up close.  Johnrcrellin (talk) 09:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I understand what you say, but would like to see it cited from elsewhere. If you look at the next week's tides in Weston you will see that as the tide gets later in the morning its height gets less. However, on Tuesday 15th high tide is late in the morning at 11:07 and is still a relatively high 10.8 metres. At this height the tide is quite a way up the beach. I too lived in Weston for a long time, and still live nearby, so know what it looks like when you only get a 9 metre high tide. --TimTay (talk) 09:17, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Can you find this referenced on an external website or in a book anywhere? It would be really good to add it to the article. --TimTay (talk) 13:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I think there may be some truth in the original comment, I just don't understand why it is. If you look at Weston's tide times for Jan & Feb 2010 ( ) you will see that the 12m+ tides all occur first thing in the morning or in the evening, rarely during the time a tourist would typically be on the beach. However, the phenomenon isn't unique to Weston, I suspect it happens with tides all over the world, so I think it is right to delete the text from the article. --Simple Bob (talk) 12:30, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes and if you look at other months you'll see that the highest tides occur at times ranging from 06:30ish to 10:30ish. Ron519098 (talk) 13:06, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tides

message: This article shouldn't be spammed with details of that pier fire, and certainly not on 5 places throughout that article. That's very amateuristic. The pier has its own article where all the details can be added. This article is about the town, and as such should tell the history of the town, not the history of each event happening to each specific building in it. Moreover, adding a name in the famous people list as "Town's official biggest pier fan" seems rather nonsense to me. --194.7.246.43 (talk) 13:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Amateurish"? Have you looked at what you did in your revert - you wiped out plenty of other valid efforts and improvements. Pince Nez (talk) 13:12, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spam 

message: Looks like there's alot of activity here on an article that will be experiencing a visitor spike (for obvious reasons).
If anybody is hoping to expand the article, I'd urge them to take a breif look at WP:UKCITIES with regards to standard layout. Hope that helps, --Jza84 |  Talk   23:28, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout 

message: I would suggest that Oldmixon (and any other suburbs) should be merged into this article as they are unlikely to ever be signifcant articles in their own right and would be thought of by most people as part of the town.— Rod talk 13:38, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, although I would suggest that Uphill remains separate as it does have a more distinct identity.--TimTay (talk) 14:19, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK can you suggest other suburbs which currently have their own articles (probably stubs)?— Rod talk 14:25, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think West Wick (which doesn't currently have an article) should probably redirect here, but what about Worle? I note St. Georges, North Somerset and Kewstoke are both separate parishes so should probably have their own entries.— Rod talk 15:05, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oldmixon & West Wick now merged in.— Rod talk 17:56, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Does the name Knightsbridge Theatre mean anything to anybody? I remember playing in a company run by Philip Barrett, husband of Eileen Herlie, in a production of Love in Idleness, around 1948. I can't Google any of this. JohnClarknew (talk) 07:06, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you mean the Knightstone Theatre, which closed some time ago and has now been converted into luxury apartments. Google for "knightstone island" and you will find lots of info. --TimTay (talk) 10:26, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repertory Theatres 

message: I have removed an external link to the Wheel of Weston web site which appears to be a purely commercial promotional site which adds nothing to the article. If anyone want to add this back again, could they discuss it here first to gain consensus?— Rod talk 14:13, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to "Wheel of Weston" website 

message: Why the references to various nightclubs and pubs? This is of dubious value, particularly as the life-span of many of these establishments is limited and therefore their existence ephemeral. It also smacks of desperation! Yes Weston may have limited cultural venues but a number of these establishments are simply venues for drunken nights out. I have removed the references to those which do not have some (tenuous) link to live entertainment.Ron519098 (talk) 12:07, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Culture 

message: Should Roald Dahl be included in the notable people list? It appears he spent a short period of time at a boarding school in the town, but I'm not sure that is a strong enough link. We also have Mandy Miller actress - whose article was deleted - should she be in?— Rod talk 11:42, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are saying that WsM was significant to Dahl ( and therefore should be included in the article about him), but was Dahl significant to WsM, which is the focus of this article?— Rod talk 06:57, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

text: Not sure but what about others ? (From memory may be wrong) Cleese didn't spend long there but he talks about WSM so significant to him and same school. I'm fairly sure Eddington was only there for a short part of his childhood and never went back... Johnrcrellin (talk) 07:32, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The standard seems to be to include those that were born in a town (eg Cleese) but I would agree to removing those that only spent a small part of their childhood there but didn't have a significance for the town (eg Edington). The relevant guideline is probably Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements#Notable people. The problem is if all the people who went to a particular school were included in the article about the place in which is was based it could overwhelm the article. To use a local(ish) example if all the alumni of Monkton Combe School were included in the Monkton Combe article it would nearly double the content! However I don't feel that strongly about it and if you want to Dahl back I will not remove it again, alternatively an article about St Peter's School (which we don't have at present) should definitely include Dahl.— Rod talk 08:36, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

text:  Agreed - and there isn't much about the school, apart from a closed alumni site which I have requested access to. Johnrcrellin (talk) 08:33, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

text: Quite a few to delete from the list then I think... Johnrcrellin (talk) 15:53, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roald Dahl & Mandy Miller 

message: There is an assertion in the article that acts mime their vocals as the event is being televised. Where is the evidence for this? While it may be the case that some acts mime, I find it hard to believe that this is universally the case. Ron519098 (talk) 16:27, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There seem to be lots of comments on forums etc (not WP:RS) but there is a report here (which might make it as RS) saying "producers of the T4 'On The Beach' event told the band they will be forced to mime."— Rod talk 16:39, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  T4 On The Beach 

message: I've been editing this article to try to bring it closer to the guidelines at WP:UKCITIES and would be interested in what other editors think is need to get it to meet the Wikipedia:Good article criteria? Obviously we need to expand the lead to summarise the article & reference (or remove) the uncited claims, but is there anything else which would be required?— Rod talk 17:41, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What else is needed to get this article to GA? 

message: The section on the name includes two sentences for which I can find no evidence "first recorded by an unknown medieval church clerk, presumably to distinguish it from other settlements named Weston in the area. It is a popular myth that the description was a later Victorian invention. Often people will write the town's name as "Weston-Super-Mare"; this however is incorrect, as "super" should always be written in lower case." The only places I can find this are mirror sites of wikipedia. Has anyone else got sources which would back these claims up? If not I propose removing them until evidence can be found.— Rod talk 10:13, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a reference for latin name orgin, removing the "unknown clerk" bit because that isn't covered by the reference. I removed the other bits though as I agree they need citing. I suggest they be put back if refs can be found. --Simple Bob (talk) 10:33, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toponymy of name 

message: A large number of websites contain an incorrect spelling duplicating an error present in Ofcom's (previously Oftel) UK area code list for the last decade.
01934 was listed as Weston-Super-Mare in the official UK area code list and only recently corrected to Weston-super-Mare, see their Errata. 212.139.105.91 (talk) 08:31, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Phone Code

message: Weston seems to have undergone a revival since the seafront and pier were rebuilt and reopened in 2010. It is now an extremely nice place to visit and often very busy. However most of the visitor number and visitor trend figures quoted in the article predate the new seafront/pier and thus seem to focus on decline. This gives an incorrect impression to the reader.
My guess, as father of a family that visits 3-6 times a year, is that visitor numbers have been persistently increasing year-on-year since 2010. Where might we find a reliable source that could confirm/deny such a statistical progression? Ideally we need a single source that shows 2010, 2011 and 2012 numbers collected in a consistent fashion. If such a revival is supported by sources, I would like to add a "Revival" subsection. Andrew Oakley (talk) 09:33, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a great suggestion and as a frequent visitor I would echo your comments. The place has really come up since the pier reopened and the works relating to the new wall and road-redirection took place on the front. --Bob Re-born (talk) 09:51, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-2010 Revival 

message: The figure of 17,000 incendiary bombs is not supported by the cited web page.  I found a different page which says 3,000 incendiary bombs - http://www.thewestonmercury.co.uk/news/weston_super_mare_at_war_1_777642 but no reliable support for 17,000.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.158.8.39 (talk) 08:17, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your comment. Looking at the source used in the article I can't see the 17,000 figure either, however the Weston Mercury source you give says the 3,000 figure was on January 4, 1941 so a much larger figure for the whole of the war is quite possible.— Rod talk 08:26, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This site does have the 17,000 figure but I'm not sure it can be used as a reliable source and neither can this one.— Rod talk 08:33, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  17,000 for the war is possible, but the article presently puts that figure on two dates - which I would suspect is a single night's raid. "On 3 and 4 January 1941, 17,000 incendiary bombs fell on the town.[28]"   It was a big night for Bristol too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol_Blitz#Following_raids  Perhaps worth using "Five high explosive bombs and three thousand incendiaries fell on the town, killing 34 people and injuring a further 85" from http://www.walkingthebattlefields.com/2012/11/the-clevedon-blitz-night-of-4th-and-5th.html (or a better source if one can be found) - which indirectly makes the point that counting incendiaries gives a misleading impression of a raid? 109.158.8.39 (talk) 08:39, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

text:  (On the site you linked it does say "and surrounding cities" which rather undermines the figure) 109.158.8.39 (talk) 08:41, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wartime / bombing 

message: Can anyone here provide any help in identifying this particular building? Kelly hi! 18:25, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, disregard. Identified as :Commons:Category:Silica, Weston-super-Mare. Kelly hi! 18:35, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: see also my pic :File:Westernsilica.JPG which I described by the local (slightly derogatory) term "The Carrot".— Rod talk 18:44, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have to agree! Kelly hi! 18:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requesting help identifying photo subject 

message: Anybody watching this page lately will notice that I've added and changed several of the images, including the main image. These changes are explained on the history page, but I just wanted to reiterate them here:
*I switched the main image from the one taken in 2008 to a recently-uploaded one from 2020, showing the pier with the newer pavilion (and arguably giving a better idea of the 'look' of the town than the aeroplane image)
*I've added a view over Weston in the 1890s to the history section to illustrate its development as a Victorian seaside town; it seemed strange that these wonderful and illustrative images were available for use in the Commons and yet none appeared in the article
*I switched the modern-day image of Birnbeck Pier in the history section to one from around 1900, which seemed more appropriate given that the section is about the town's initial Victorian development
*I added an image of Victorian architecture commonly found around the town to the architecture section, to illustrate what it says about local stone buildings
*I switched the image of the now-closed SeaQuarium with one of the now-open Tropicana, as this seemed more relevant to the economy/tourism section
*I switched the image of the Grand Pier from 2011 to a recently-uploaded one from 2020, which I think gives a better idea of the pavilion's scale with the people on the beach nearby, and which also shows the tea room on the back of the pier
*I switched the Knightstone Island picture to one that shows the whole island, rather than just one of the buildings, to better illustrate what the article says about the island
Hopefully nobody has any objections to the changes. Some of the old pictures have been in this article a while and I feel that the changes better reflect the town as it is currently. Helpful987 (talk) 11:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've also now switched the image of the Silica to one that shows the whole structure, giving a better idea of its scale and its location within the town centre. Helpful987 (talk) 14:41, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image additions and changes