lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Russell Street bombing

message: I saw this on Forensic Investigators and one thing the programme didn't cover very well and nor does the article is what the motive was. Was it just because they didn't like the police? There was I believe an armed robbery of a bank on the day this happened and Stan Taylor used to be a bank robber so was this one of the motives or even the primary motive (to provide cover for the bank robbery)? Nil Einne 11:51, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've wondered the same thing.  What was the motive? —Moondyne click! 08:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motive 

message: I believe he had his sentence overturned. Not sure why altho I'm pretty sure he cooperated with the police Nil Einne 12:06, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rodney Minogue 
Talk:Wanda Beach Murders

message: I think this article would benefit from a map of the beach showing the surf club, direction of movement, where the bodies were found and metric and imperial measurements seeing that both are used here but this should only be made by someone with a good knowledge of the crime and area.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.104.85.96 (talk) 13:27, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:Family Guy Viewer Mail 1

message: In response to the anonymous user who posted "Questions to be answered" Cromulent Kwyjibo 21:28, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "The episode depicted Joe in a wagon for the "Little Rascals" parody, however, it has been said that he did not lose use of his legs until after he became a cop."
Peter and Quagmire also didn't grow up to become rich, against women and possible homosexuals. So I don't think the above sentence in the notes section needs to be included. Bennity 22:03, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The three segments all have out-of-continuity endings; this episode as a whole is clearly non-canon. Noclevername 00:50, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: I'm removing the list of superheroes that the SuperGriffins are supposedly like-- it's questionable and speculative. --  Noclevername 00:37, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Superheroes?

message: Re: Super Griffins
No Ordinary Family much?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pokepal101 (talk • contribs) 09:44, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Super Griffins
Template talk:U-Bahn

message: Why U-Bahns?  On the Hamburg discussion page there is a discussion about the plural of Autobahn and Autobahnen won being the correct German plural.  Should this template not follow suit? --84.144.10.228 21:32, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Sry, but the choice of entries doesn't make any sense to me. The most obvious one is Lausanne – it's not even in the Germna-speaking part of Switzerland, few people would call the system "U-Bahn" there. The systems in Dortmund and Frankfurt are also included in the Template:Stadtbahn systems. While the one in Dortmund clearly is a Stadtbahn system and is also called that, the one in Frankfurt is usually called "U-Bahn" and featuredd a "real" metro line for some time, the U4. Though this line was extended and now doesn't meet the technical creteria anymore, I will keep it listed. So, I'm basically going to revert the most recent changes to the template. --Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 07:19, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Choice of entries
Talk:FreeDOS

message: Does FreeDOS and/or FreeDOS-32 support Unicode?  I know the original MS-DOS did not, but was curious if FreeDOS does. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.118.72.111 (talk • contribs) . 19:24, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe not. The FreeDOS wiki says nothing on the subject. The only mention of UTF-8 is in a description of a graphical browser for DOS which happens to support it. -- Pingumeister (talk) 19:31, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unicode? 

message: With this diff  I am removing a bunch of superfluous information.  The point of this tiny paragraph is to state that FreeDOS can not be used as the bootloader for Win9x.  It's not a general discussion of the DOS usage of Win9x, which was incorrect anyways.  In discussion of a bootloader, it is irrelevant whether DOS was available as a separate product.  "will refuse to run on anything but versions of MS-DOS that came with them" is a POV statement, it's not about refusal, it's a basic design issue that DOS is being avoided entirely.  This was also a recent edit that prompted my edit.  "As a result, FreeDOS can not run Windows 95, 98, or Millennium Edition" Yes, that says the same thing the previous sentence did.  We do not need to repeat ourselves.  I also cut the list of boot-managers to only mention the one that comes with FreeDOS. We don't need a list, because any number of dozens can manage this.  SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 04:13, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  With Win9x 

message: The lead section says there is no default GUI, however, one can type "dosshell" and get to a GUI, although adding this to the installation options is required, I think. 161.31.231.60 (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  GUI 

message: The Revision History table is linked to citation/note [13] which is an email from 2007. The table which cites this email also includes revisions with dates of 2012 and 2016 (which is yet in the future) that are not and could not be mentioned in 2007. Where is the proof of this future release?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CC23:7800:ED7A:D368:BB6F:2D67 (talk) 05:54, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision History table and citation concern
Talk:Naturally, Sadie

message: To whomever is constantly removing that section: if you have valid reason for doing so, please, at least be fair and let me know what that reason is.
:Better yet, who keeps deleting the episode list? ---- DanTD 19:28, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the Controversy section constantly being deleted? 

message: Why did Disney Channel drop the series? WAVY 10 21:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probabaly because of low ratings, But I really miss it. QuasyBoy 13:28, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just wondering... 

message: I'm not an serious editor, so I don't know know a lot of the rules, but this article definitely has problems.
One good example would be the section under Ben Harrison's name. The ENTIRE description of him is an account of various times that he almost kissed or did kiss the main character (Sadie). I'm not exactly sure about all of Wikipedia's rules, but this does NOT seem like a good description of a character, it feels like it was written by a little girl. No offense to any of the responsible little girl editors out there.
Another problem the article has is the grammar in random parts is off.
I could be wrong here, but if there is someone with greater experience in editing articles I would definitely suggest you take a look at this article.
Sentry11 (talk) 04:39, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is something wrong with this article.
Talk:Sugarloaf Mountain

message: The expression "set sugarcane" bothers me.
Which meaning of "set" is this?
Guslacerda 21:43, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It refers to the hardening of sugar from cane.  Loaf sugar was produced from cane sugar syrup, which ultimately hardened.  The result is a cone-shaped loaf, as mentioned in sugarloaf.  The phrase which described sugar production has been replaced with mention of the common cone-shaped sugar.  (SEWilco 05:21, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Set sugarcane 

message: The article quotes US $22 but it is currently R$53 (~US $30).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.60.176.232 (talk) 22:13, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cost has gone substantially up with the weak dollar 

message: I am deleting the expression "third world" ("Opening of the tram. First lift of Brazil and the third world. The first cable cars were coated wood and were used for 60 years."), as this expression is outdated and not appropriate.  Jgsodre (talk) 02:56, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "Third World"

message: The Sugar Loaf Mountain is visibly similar to Half Dome & the domes of Tuolumne.  Would it be possible for an expert to comment on whether or not this is so?
Also, when last I visited Yosemite, much was made of Glacial action in the formation of Half Dome & the Glacier Apron featurew - did glaciation play a role if forming the Sugar Loaf?  If so (and perhaps if not too) it would be useful & interesting if an explanation or theories on how it was formed could be included here. Or is desert erosion, rather than glacial action, thought to be either the cause of the shape or the cause of the smooth finish?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.196.5.155 (talk) 17:06, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glacial action? Compare & contrast with Half Dome the domes of Tuolumne Meadows, Yosemite.
Talk:Fort Necessity National Battlefield

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  --dashiellx (talk) 00:52, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: The article mentions the tavern and the grave, but isn't Jumonville Glen also part of the park? Rwflammang (talk) 13:41, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jumonville Glen 

message: The Fort Necessity Site, Braddock's Grave and Jumonville Glen are not connected, but are located along a eight mile stretch along what was then a slightly improved ancient trail, which is now a 2 lane highway, US Rte. 40 near Uniontown, Pennsylvania.
Washington's troops initiated the skirmish at Jumonville Glen, then retreated to the Fort Necessity site eight miles away and built a primitive defensive fort when they realized that news would reach the French and a larger French force would be returning for revenge (which is exactly what happened). Braddock's death occurred a year later when he and an English force failed to capture Fort Duquesne in Pittsburgh, and retreated back along the trail. At the time, the area was remote forest, and is still heavily forested and lightly inhabited.
The park sites are not heavily visited, but are well maintained.
The Fort Necessity Battlefield (includes the battlefield and an adjoining state park):
http://maps.google.com/?ll=39.816019,-79.599423&spn=0.026865,0.065274&t=m&z=15&vpsrc=6
Braddock Grave (very small state park):
http://maps.google.com/?ll=39.83329,-79.600625&spn=0.026858,0.065274&t=m&z=15&vpsrc=6
Jumonville Glen (very small National Park):
http://maps.google.com/?ll=39.883989,-79.64633&spn=0.026839,0.065274&t=m&z=15&vpsrc=6
Rarkm (talk) 00:59, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parks Location Question
Talk:Who I Am Hates Who I've Been

message: I really think the Video and Song sections of this article are in serious need of wikification, but I don't want to do it (yet) for fear of total deletion, which I would actually also back up. Opinions? Wildyoda 22:40, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Their position on the roof symbolizes Relient K's, or maybe God's insightful perspective being one on one else can have in the present." That makes no sense. Whoever wrote this, or anybody who knows what it is supposed to mean, please fix it; I'm clueless.--WatchHawk 01:22, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed all unencyclopedic speculation on meanings of lyrics and video. I'm going to remove the cleanup tag; now its just a stub. —Akrabbimtalk 19:39, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Who is the female actor in the music video? Usually articals show those kind of credits
:Her name is C.C. Shepherd. She's also in a band of her own, but I forget the name. Yeah, her name should be added. BTW, if you're ever looking for info like this, check the FAQ at the RelientK.com Forums.RoryS89 23:19, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Credits 

message: Is there a way to keep the lyrics on the left instead of regular text?     Jcpizzadude 14:16, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics 

message: I still think that maybe the lyrics to the song should have been added, even tho it increases the length of the article majorly, it would be a big help to some people to grasp the meaning of the lyrics instead of just pointing them out and saying "this means this".Shika8 (talk) 22:03, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: =Including Lyrics

message: Do we really need to say how many times the video has been viewed on Youtube (in the Trivia section). I wouldn't say it's pointless but it adds nothing to the article. I'm going to delete it. Quinnfeld (talk) 22:13, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Youtube

message: Removing. None of this is particularly significant or cited.   Aaron  ►  00:59, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 
Talk:Lopmon

message: Ok, enough of this gender edit war. Can we please finally decide what gender we're going to use for Lopmon in this article and stick with it? Gagbumon 05:41, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest we end this edit war and just go with It. Personally I think all -mon articles should use it just like the Digimon Gallery Profiles in Digimon World Dawn/Dusk. Nightmare SE 00:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please make a concensus about this issue, then maybe RPP for this article. --Chininazu12 00:59, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to be the same IP (24.251.150.92) as before. Personally I'd rather just treat the gender the same way we do names, explain it at least once and then use the term that most English speaking readers will recognize. But, in an attempt to settle 
this I've tried to remove all of the basic gender references. It makes for a slightly jerky read in some spots, but most of them need to be rewritten anyways. I also removed a big chunk of speculation while I was at it. . -- Ned Scott 04:49, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gender 

message: Hey guys, I was just wondering if anyone has even bothered putting Lopmon's Ultimate and Mega forms because no one did and I've seen Wendigomon and Cherubimon already so I'll be putting them here. If anyone wants to help me publish and make their descriptions better then you are more than welcome but please don't remove them!!. If you have any problems with them then please discuss it with me before doing so. Blueknightex (talk) 05:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A lot of people have tried including it, and we keep needing to remove it. This article was made specifically for the Lopmon from Digimon Tamers, who never showed a Champion or Mega form - Therefore adding those forms in this article is technically speculation. The Lopmon "species" and the Movie 3 Lopmon both had their own articles, both I believe were moved to the wikia - You're probably looking for one of those. Gagbumon (talk) 06:57, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lopmon's Digivolution
Talk:Eurodistrict

message: How is this an equivalent of Washington D.C.?
:It is the capital of Europe
No, it won't be the capital of Europe. I would imagine that the parallel with Washington D.C. is that it was created out of two states, Maryland and Virginia, which ceded their territory (although Virginia's territory got ceded back). In any event, this article is in desperate need of sourcing. The article was created in 2004; surely there has been some development since then in the negotiations? And would does it mean anyway to be a "Eurodistrict"? Would France and Germany lose some of their sovereignty over the areas? --Mathew5000 01:06, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I brought over some information from the French Wikipedia article. It's most likely unrefined.
Concerning the other notes on this article's entry on the translation page, the French Eurodistrict article treats a eurodistrict and a euroregion as different. However, the article at euroregion redirects to eurodistrict.
If someone could please verify that... --Laogeodritt 14:28, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  :fr:Eurodistrict 

message: Why does an image depicting the skyline of Tokyo accompany an article on Europe? Unless I'm missing something, it should be removed. DigitalDracula (talk) 05:01, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevant Image
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/NPOVenforcer

message: I do not believe that a user should be allowed to create a list of users he or she believes are violating one or more wikipedia policies, a litany of people that disagree with them, or a list of people they believe has libelled them on their User page or anywhere else on Wikipedia's space. The normal dispute resolution process has been created for this, and it is ironic that on the one instance where I am directly involved with a dispute with NPOVenforcer the process appears to be working -- on Talk:Polyamory, where we have been attempted to engage in a polite discussion and seem to be approaching consensus at this time. Even apart from the user's other behavior, this sort of list is inherently unCivil. Kit 23:14, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Mine as well so I hope I also followed proper procedure. Kit 02:43, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Committed the criminal behavior of trying to frame the NPOVenforcer of threatening his person, so as to attempt to put the NPOVenforcer in prison for exposing Dominick's bad behavior.  I accuse him of trying to kill me with gales of laughter. Dominick (ŤαĿĶ) 12:59, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  My position
Talk:Logical equality

message: JA: I have restored the name to the rightful moniker of Logical equality.  This is what it's called in logic, and also in programming languages going back to Fortran.  Hardware folks may seek their own salvation, and I'm sure that the equanimity of logicians will eventually be equal to the task of curing souls among those Philistines, but in the meantime we have to do our level best to call an equality and equality.  Jon Awbrey 12:02, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Logical Equality

message: Do we really need both truth tables? — Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 16:03, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Truth Tables
Template talk:AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD

message: If you don't like the length of this template's name, then my apologies, but don't move it about-- it's too unimportant for such trivialties. If you believe it to be unencyclopedic please put Template:Inclusionist up for deletion as well. Thank you! Ashibaka (tock) 23:20, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it needs a few more consonants, it rolls off the tongue far too easily. Maybe throw some wingdings in there. Eluchil 10:09, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Would anyone be up for making a userbox-compatible version? The current one appears a bit too bulky. Algebra 01:56, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's one at  - BanyanTree 23:07, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Userbox version?
Talk:Dimitri Nanopoulos

message: This is based on a misinterpretation of the H index (physics). H index is computed against a database, but databases carry only current publications, or - at best - publications going several decades back. So D.N. isn't and can't be "the fourth most cited scientist in history", unless history started in 1970. GregorB 20:49, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: "The fourth most cited scientist in history"?

message: Following discussion and recent edits, I see no reason for this page to continue to carry warnings over lack of neutrality and accuracy.  Robma 11:40, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality and accuracy restoration

message: I reverted the chaged made by Huego because it was a copyright violation. It was taken from a site  which clearly has a copyright at the bottom of the page. Tartan 20:43, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have replied, but I would like to point out to you that site's disclaimer.  Tartan 21:02, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Thank you. If possible try to deviate from the original as much as you can, making the wikipedia article not sound too much like it. Tartan 21:09, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert

message: his name is Dimitris or if you prefer Dimitrios. i dont really understand why we have to call him dimitri. Convenience instead of accuracy?
:The sources, such as his university website and the article about him in ScienceDaily, use Dimitri. TimidGuy (talk) 14:39, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: name

message: Timidguy - what you "think" is not relevant, and is certainly no basis for the removal of reliably sourced information from an article.  Fladrif (talk) 14:09, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Barr had nothing to do with the derivation of flipped model from superstring. Nor for that matter did Deredinger 1984. TimidGuy (talk) 11:47, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert of Info on Origins of Flipped SU(5)
Talk:Black Comedy (play)

message: I found the complete text at . I didn't add an external link to it, because there is no evidence they had permission to copy it. Art LaPella 23:32, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Text

message: When I corrected this article, I listed as many of the significant productions of the play as I could find, but I suspect that there are two others I didn't list. I know the play was rewritten four times, in 1968 (The Lyric Theatre Production), 1976, 1993 (Roundabout Theatre Company Production), and 1998, but I don't know whether the 1976 and 1998 rewrites were connected with specific productions. I suspect they are. I you have any info on them, please feel free to add them to the Production History.  --Carminestone (talk) 10:59, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Completing the Production History 
Talk:Kicking Television: Live in Chicago

message: Just a few things - mostly referencing.
*Lead has no sources - this needs to change.
*"Although the band filmed the concerts, they decided not to release the footage as a DVD." - Seems to contradict the fact that the album was released...
*"Critical reception to the album was very positive." --> "Critical reception to the album was generally positive." (Less POV)
*Track listings and Personnel section needs referencing.
*Ref 2 (near quote) should probably come at the end of the quote, rather then at the end of the sentence introducing it.
Reviewed version:  Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 03:25, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made the following additions based on the suggestions:
*Put in a picture of Wilco from the A Ghost Is Born tour (the same tour that these concerts were performed).
*Changed "very" to "generally" in the lead.
*Put reference links on the Track Listings and Personnel sections.
As for the rest:
*"Don't" is used during a direct quote, so it should stay as is.
*The lead of an article is typically uncited. This is because any statements made in the lead are expected to be covered in the body of the article. The only cites in a lead are reserved for direct quotes or controversial statements.
*There's no agreement as to where cites should go when using the cquote template. Most featured articles have the cite before the tempalte (see Wilco, Pixies, etc.).
*I don't understand how the DVD sentence is contradictory. Both the lead and the body state that footage of the concerts was filmed but never released.
Teemu08 00:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Passed.  Sorry about the DVD thing, the usage of "Live album" confused me into thinking that Live album = DVD...anyways, all good. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 01:01, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA on hold
Talk:1964 Winter Olympics

message: Should the deaths of Ross Milne and Kazimierz Kay-Skyszpeski (also spelt Kay-Skrzypeski or Kay-Skrzypecki?) during practice be mentioned? Andjam 23:58, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deaths before the games 

message: Hi, Canada has since 2014 at the 1694 Winter OG: 1 Gold, 1 Silber and 1 Bronze, see: . So I make the respective modifications in all the articles, please don't undo it. Leonprimer (talk) 19:06, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Canada at the 1964 Winter Olympics