Talk:Autoroutes of Quebec

message: ===1) Autoroute 16 and Autoroute 18 ===
These two entries are unsourced. I have had an interest in Québec roads for 20+ years and I have never seen any reference to either one of those two alleged autoroutes. Please provide a source.
--Prop in SF 19:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unused Autoroute Links

message: These two entries are unsourced. I have had an interest in Québec roads for 20+ years and I have never seen any reference to either one of those two alleged autoroutes. Please provide a source.
--Prop in SF 19:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 1) Autoroute 16 and Autoroute 18 

message: I didn't find anything for Autoroute 16, but I found this which seems to be an official MTQ document regarding a future Autoroute 18
http://webfil_92.tripod.com/autoroutes_en/id93.html
Alex@MTRL 23:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  response 

message: I see these listed here, 
*I remember seeing 51 0n the maps--why not note it is part of 55?
*430, now 30 east of Lafontaine Tunnel.
Bacl-presby 21:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2) Autoroute 430, Autoroute 51

message: I've moved this page fronm Autoroute (Quebec) to Autoroutes of Quebec, to follow the examples of Autoroutes of France and other pages. Joeldl 20:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: The Tunnel L.H. Lafontaine has now 40 year's old.
... ... ... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.82.127.55 (talk) 02:30, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tunnel L.H. Lafontaine (Now 40 year's old.) 

message: Is there any particular reason that the list of autoroutes does not link to the individual articles for each separate autoroute? Not sure what the style should be - if each header should be a hyperlink, or if each should have eg Main article: Autoroute 50 beneath it.
On a related note, there is very little consistency between how the list here is structured compared with the lists for Ontario and (different again) for Nova Scotia.   
90.195.45.235 (talk) 17:51, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Links to main article pages; consistency

message: I feel that this page is inconsistent and has way to many uncredited resources. As such, I have begun overhauling the page. My goal is to make it look much more like the Ontario 400-Series Highways page, which I feel is very well structured. The first thing I have done is categorized the Autoroutes into "Main Class", "Spur Class", and "Unbuilt/Proposed". I have also completed adding infoboxes to the Main Class autoroutes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.204.198.245 (talk) 03:31, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overhauling the Page 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Autoroutes of Quebec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090304225117/http://www.autoroute30.qc.ca/documents/6/MTQ-LettreVol4no5_En_Web.pdf to http://www.autoroute30.qc.ca/documents/6/MTQ-LettreVol4no5_En_Web.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090204114157/http://webfil_92.tripod.com:80/autoroutes_en/id90.html to http://webfil_92.tripod.com/autoroutes_en/id90.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Interstate Highways in Quebec and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 29#Interstate Highways in Quebec until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 10:23, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Interstate Highways in Quebec" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]