lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hurry Sundown (film)

message: The word "sharecropper" is used to refer to an apparent land owner.  Is this not an incorrect use of the term?  As best I can tell, sharecroppers did not (do not) own the land they farmed (farm).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkudra (talk • contribs) 03:31, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly incorrect word usage 
Talk:The Magus (film)

message: Is the film different from the book concerning the previous English Professor at the Lord Byron School on Phraxos?  In the book, the previous tenant in the post was still alive and Urfe met up with him, receiving the cryptic warning about 'the waiting room', before going out there. 83.104.32.186 16:51, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Different

message: What is a "coda" here?
"The final scene (which may be interpreted almost as a coda) has to do with Nicholas' relationship with Anne and whether or not it continues."
Dynasteria (talk) 08:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coda 

message: Though references are cited, 99.99% of this article is word-for-word found on IMDB.com.  Since no independent information is cited (such as an actual review of the movie given its infamy) I assume that the references were nothing more than a quick Google search to make it appear it wasn't boosted from IMDB.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.23.86.249 (talk) 17:39, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suspected Plagiarism
Talk:California Suite

message: Why is this classified as comedy? Its a basically a dry, rambling drama. Aero13792468 (talk) 17:22, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Beyond the Poseidon Adventure

message: There is also a book entitled "Beyond The Poseidon Adventure"  which is a sequel to the film, and begins immediately after the ending of "The Poseidon Adventure" The book seems to have suffered the same fate as the original Poseidon Novel, being twisted into an almost unrecognizable version of itself for the film.
:Speaking of the book, can someone who owns it redo the book section? It needs much work. Lots42 (talk) 04:53, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the section about the book. It does not seem relevant to the article about the movie, and is so long that it overwhelmed the article. The book does not seem notable enough for a stand-alone article either. --Diannaa (Talk) 16:30, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Book

message: I checked IMBD's cast list and such, but I couldn't find the three survivors from the last film on the list. And none of the media I have seen show evidence of Ernest Borgnine, Red Buttons, or Jack Albertson appering in the production. Is the summary accurate? Andrewnuva199 (talk) 21:08, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Is Summary accurate?

message: This section ought to be expanded or deleted entirely.  In any case, the original Poseidon Adventure is not a "prequel," so I have changed that. Geoffr111 (talk) 12:45, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Reception
Talk:Dressed to Kill (1980 film)

message: This sentence is a mess:  "A New York City housewife who is brutally stabbed to death in an elevator subsequently follows her psychiatrist, her teenage son, and a prostitute who witnessed her murder."  Does someone want to take another shot at it?75.169.158.225 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 02:35, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who wrote this?
Talk:Greetings (1968 film)

message: Is it true that this was the first American film to receive an "X" rating? The article for The Girl on a Motorcycle (U.S. title: Naked Under Leather) says that it was the first.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gcjnst (talk • contribs) 03.00 27 0ctober 2020 (UTC)
:It is.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 04:49, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  First "X" film?
Talk:Phantom of the Paradise

message: The "Trivia" section in this article seems to be a word-for-word cut and paste of the Internet Movie Database entry on this film. I am going to remove it, if no-one objects. 
Morandir (talk) 02:16, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Plagiarism

message: Everytime I recommend the movie to someone, they discover the whole plot here...
Which is kind of too bad for a such movie...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.251.86.69 (talk) 13:42, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia contains spoilers. And the plot here is fine. Removing tag. oknazevad (talk) 19:09, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much details. 
Talk:Obsession (1976 film)

message: I read the plot synopsis. Then I read:
"After the film was completed, Columbia executives expressed unease over the incest theme"
Er.... what incest theme? TheMadBaron 01:17, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your confusion was understandable, since the story summary as it was kept this major plot twist unrevealed.  I have now expanded the synopsis with spoiler-filled details.-Hal Raglan 21:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

text: The incest theme . . . how could anyone who viewed this film have missed it? My God, the Genevieve Bujold character Sandra is in fact the biological daughter of the man she is trying to swindle. They marry and make love. Ewww! It leads me to wonder how their emotional embrace at film's end could be construed as a happy ending. It's more like an extremely creepy ending. ￼ 72.228.1.228 (talk) 03:54, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Confused....

message: Here is another film by the same title about Radical Islam's war against the West: http://www.obsessionthemovie.com/index1.php  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.234.211.92 (talk) 22:22, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Obsession film 

message: As the above comment notes, there are several films entitled "Obsession" yet typing "Obsession (film)" into the searh box takes you to this article instead of to the disambiguation page. Being a relatively inexperience Wikipedia editor, I have no idea how to fix this. Jgoulden (talk) 15:56, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
Talk:Tom Latham (politician)

message: Removed line saying Latham is "one of the most conservative in the country" because it's not true. By a long shot, he's not even the most conservative in the state.   - Jaysus Chris 01:02, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Most Conservative?  Not by any measure I found

message: 173.27.52.177 is making repeated attempts ( ) to add unsourced content to this article regarding the government shutdown of 2013.  Content must have sources per WP:verifiability.CFredkin (talk) 21:26, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shutdown 

message: Does anyone else think this article is up to GA status?--Bigpoliticsfan (talk) 23:50, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking for someone to nominate this article for GA status
Talk:Western Isles

message: This page should remain a redirect to Outer Hebrides.  There is a very long list of articles which link here, all of which refer to the Outer Hebrides.  The possible alternative usage is covered in a disambiguation at the top of that article, and also in the Hebrides article.  Moreover, there is no potential for an article here to grow beyond a dictionary definition. Warofdreams talk 01:02, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Casualties of War

message: In October 1988, with his health failing, Cassavetes proposed turning the rights to the script [Casualties of War] over to [Sean] Penn and Seymour Cassel for a production to be directed by [acclaimed Mormon film director] Hal Ashby. The deal was never completed. (Carney, Cassavetes on Cassavetes, page 512). Is that the same film? 77.49.253.98 (talk) 08:12, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cassavettes' script? 

message: In the DVD documentary, De Palma says there was another movie made about the same true story and that created a big controversy in Berlin ( a film by a German filmmaker) anyone knows what movie this was?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.235.178.229 (talk) 10:37, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Probably the movie "O.k.", by Michael Verhoeven. Verhoeven is German, his film predates De Palma's, and is based on the same crime. 190.194.247.223 (talk) 02:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  A "remake" of another movie?
Talk:Raising Cain

message: I have a different understanding of the plot. I think Margo is in control from the point where she emerges during Dr Waldheim's interrogation. She goes to Dr Nix's motel to rescue the children and kill Dr Nix, being the only personality with a motive to do so. Neither Carter nor Cain are involved from this point. It is implied Margo is still in control in the final scene.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.133.33.132 (talk) 15:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Talk:The Fourth Protocol

message: One article for the novel, one for the film, one for the game. Her Pegship 00:58, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: agree  --Concrete Cowboy 12:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Frodet 20:45, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks!! And if you're into this sort of thing, take a look at User:Eagle 101/films that are also novels list. Her Pegship 04:18, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split suggestion 

message: Well, is it? The article isn't ultra-short anymore, although it consists mainly of a plot summary. --Peter Knutsen 21:21, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this still a stub? 

message: While this page could do with a major edit (talking about the themes Forsyth seized upon i.e. the Anti-Nuclear Sentiment in the UK at the time rather then just a plot summary) I'm so glad someone bothered to make a page about it. It is my favourite book of all time, I've just started reading it again for what must be the fifth time! Adam1983 06:18, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks!
Talk:English knitting

message: When I first put the images on the page, I experimented with using the gallery tag, but rejected it.  The problem is, it doesn't wrap to the width of your window, and so I can't see all the pictures at once.  This is not satisfactory.  I'll be happy to use the builtin gallery tag once it's not broken. /blahedo (t) 01:07, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gallery

message: Wikipedia doesn't seem to have much on knitting in general it has few stiches and doesn't talk about droping stitches etc.
as a bit of a novice I cannot address this problem. (This comment posted by 144.136.26.225)
:That's true, but then, Wikipedia isn't really a knitting how-to site.  It gives an encyclopaedic overview of various aspects of knitting (and many other things!), but if you're looking for good details on things like picking up dropped stitches or fancier techniques, you should probably go to a dedicated knitting site. /blahedo (t) 05:19, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not a useful answer, given that Wikipedia has detailed articles in so many other fields, especially anything related to modern electronics. A better answer is this: this is why Wikipedia can be edited by anyone. Please add articles that you think should be here. If you're not sure how to add articles, look up "editing wikipedia" here in wikipedia.  Jennifer Brooks (talk) 16:51, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fairly short 

message: A history section would be nice.--78.48.167.132 (talk) 00:52, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Sword of Justice (TV series)

message: I remember he used playing cards. Each card represented something. All I remember is "The Ace is the sword of justice". Anyone remember?Odo-Laas 01:08, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I vaguely recall that he would leave a playing card as his calling card. It was a bit of schtick borrowed from the likes of The Saint and the 1960s animated version of Spider-Man who'd do the same thing. 23skidoo 05:09, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Messy Thinking (talk) 23:56, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The threes
Talk:Without a Clue

message: The "Reception" section should specify award nominations / wins for this film.  See .
--LukasMatt (talk) 07:37, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception / Awards 

message: I am not sure what the phrase " with addition of Doyle's struggling with Holmes' popularity" is getting at. Doyle isn't a character in the film. The Watson character, however, does struggle with "Holmes's" boorish behavior. I don't want to simply cut this, as I'm not sure what the original intent was. PurpleChez (talk) 20:57, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  opening paragraph
Talk:Noises Off (film)

message: Is definitely not NPOV JackO'Lantern 05:33, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary
Talk:The Muppets Take Manhattan

message: I'm not against a quotes section, but the one quote we had wasn't a particularly good one.  One of the ones I find more memorable was from Ed Koch, where he said something about hiring the frog that the other Muppets were describing.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:42, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotes 

message: Who performed Grundgetta for this movie? Brian Muehl or Pam Arciero? -- 71.184.193.224 (talk) 17:11, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grundgetta 

message: "The Muppets Take Manhattan was first released on VHS and the now defunct CED Videodisc format..."
Why is Videodisc listed as defunct, but not VHS? Theotherchairduck (talk) 16:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunct
Talk:A Muppet Family Christmas

message: I removed the claim "This is the only Muppet production to feature Muppets associated with all four of the major Muppet franchises—The Muppet Show, Sesame Street, Fraggle Rock and Muppet Babies."  That's simply inaccurate.  There have been Muppet specials and Jim Henson retrospectives that have done this as well.  Furthermore, Uncle Travelling Matt from Fraggle Rock can be glimpsed in the wedding scene in The Muppets Take Manhattan, which stars the "Muppet Show" Muppets, originates the Muppet Babies, and features a cameo of the "Sesame Street" Muppets.  Minaker (talk) 09:20, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I wish this special would return to television as it was originally aired.Nate-Dawg921 (talk) 00:18, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Return to television
Talk:The Muppets at Walt Disney World

message: In this article, someone wrote that "the intentions of this special were revealed in 2004," as though it were some kind of dark secret. The merger between Disney and Henson was common knowledge in 1989; it was in all the newspapers. (I can provide a Chicago Tribune article for proof if necessary.) This special was part of the deal; it was well-known at the time (even though that version of the deal eventually fell through). Whoever keeps citing 2004 as the year this information came out doesn't cite any sources. Should this be changed? Can the person who wrote this elaborate? Thanks. -- TOM-H-CRGL3 20:47, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2004?
Talk:Muppet Treasure Island

message: I did a fair amount of cleanup on this article; cut a paragraph from the top and replaced the overlong plot summary with a much briefer one. However, I didn't remove the "cleanup needed" tag from the top of the page; a more experienced editor should look it over and make that decision.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgoulden (talk • contribs) 14:49, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: What is with the line in the introduction about the ocean?  Who cares what ocean it is?  Who was ever considering that it might be another ocean?  Most importantly, what is this doing in the opening section of this article? 24.127.52.15 00:13, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't have asked it better myself. 71.102.134.129 09:00, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ocean 

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 21:16, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: I removed a lot. Most of the trivia and goofs is gone; for example in a movie with talking rats a misplaced Asian elephant is just nothing. Also removed the 'Differences from novel' because again, for example, talking rats. Lots42 (talk) 11:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What I did. 

message: The Roger Ebert quote in the reception section needs a reference.  -M. Jones 68.115.248.42 (talk) 15:27, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roger Ebert quote
Talk:Muppets from Space

message: See here: p. 100  Christine (talk) 17:34, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NYT review 
Talk:It's a Very Merry Muppet Christmas Movie

message: 65.32.199.136 (talk) 21:32, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Empty request Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:24, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 October 2017 

message: 65.32.199.136 (talk) 13:40, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 November 2017 

message: Fraggle man (talk) 01:36, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Stickee (talk) 02:08, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 November 2017
Talk:Get Carter (2000 film)

message: It would be useful to get a written source pointing out Italian-American Mr Stallone's failure to pronounce the English name Doreen correctly.--Toddy1 (talk) 07:27, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation
Talk:Secondhand Lions

message: Can anyone hunt down some reviews for this film? If anyone does find some, thanks in advanced.121.1.51.190 12:10, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews 

message: Unless I missed a part of the movie, but:
* what happened to Jasmine (the princess)
* why did the two come back to the US?
* why was the money in broken-open vaults (did they convert the coins and where they just sloppy?)
Or does one need to get the super-duper-extended-edition for this? :) Jeroen  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JeroenMassar (talk • contribs) 21:00, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Jasmine died in Child Birth NewMexicoMan24 (talk) 21:41, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

text: just saw the movie recently.  Yes, Jasmine died in child birth.  I assume their service in the FFL was over and they returned.  Most likely the gold was converted to cash.  Having it in loose money and bank bags helped give the impression that maybe it was stolen loot.  Emb021129.188.33.25 (talk) 18:50, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions 

message: Robert Duvall doesn't appear in the actors list who performed in the movie... :S  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kacex (talk • contribs) 19:14, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Actors 

message: The plot was irresponsibly inflated and has now been cut down to guideline length. The film also dodges about in time, so a sequential account is not the most coherent and that has been changed too.
The rest of the entry is very low on references and much of it will have to be deleted unless this changes in a reasonable time. Who says the film has cult status, and where? What on earth does the garbled rubbish mean under the final heading "Closing Credits"? Where do the figures under "Reception" come from?  Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 18:13, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  December 2016
Talk:The Weather Man

message: Is there a source for the assertion that this film is a dramedy?Hobson (talk) 23:43, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Have reverted the edit - it seems to me that "dramatic film with dark comedic elements" will make more sense to the average reader than dramedy, and they mean roughly the same thing. Hobson (talk) 18:54, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dramedy
Talk:Bewitched (2005 film)

message: No, nothing? Nothing on her character or anything? Even though she was third-billed? Oh, okay. 206.218.208.57 (talk) 14:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Um, Shirley MacLaine? 

message: This was the last studio motion picture to be released on VHS.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.185.6.18 (talk) 18:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worth mentioning?
Talk:The Woman in Red (1984 film)

message: Just finished watching the film. This sentence from the current synopsis doesn't make sense:
"Didi, while watching this on live television, tears up as she believes Teddy is doing this because of her own cheating."
Nowhere in the film (or in any cut scenes that anyone seems to have knowledge of) suggests this character was cheating. One source suggested Didi is cheating with the Shelly character, but nowhere in the final cut (or even including the cut scene left in the credits) suggests his advances were reciprocated.
If this was the intent of the film, it is neither clear nor alluded to in the least bit - it isn't even cleverly implied as with the way the film handles Buddy's sexual orentation. Cudak888 (talk) 05:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Didi cheating?
Talk:See No Evil, Hear No Evil (film)

message: I have a copy of the official media presskit for this film as published by TriStar Pictures in 1989. Wally's surname is spelled "Karew" as can be seen in this photograph:
 
http://i.ebayimg.com/01/!BPSBD6wBGk~$%28KGrHgoOKjkEjlLm,8SUBJy5F2uccg~~_12.JPG
To confuse matters the DVD subtitles have "Kerew" while some web sites (including the Internet Movie Database) have phonetic spellings such as "Karue".  May I suggest we use the spelling the studio originally intended?
Muzilon (talk) 12:27, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of Pryor character's surname

message: In 1990 in India a Marathi film was inspired from this film. It's name is Eka Peksha Ek , Both films have similarities.I am sharing a link of a article from Times of India.https://m.timesofindia.com/entertainment/marathi/movies/news/laxmikant-berde-birth-anniversary-zapatlela-to-ashi-hi-banwa-banwi-five-must-watch-comedy-movies-of-the-evergreen-star/photostory/78866796.cms?picid=78866832 Research Voltas (talk) 17:56, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  We have to add remake section 

message: The redirect See no evil, hear no evil has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:56, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:See no evil, hear no evil]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Alice in Wonderland (1999 film)

message: In both this version and the 1972 version the Queen of Hearts is played by an actress who previously played Elizabeth 1 of England; Flora Robson in Fire over England and The Sea Hawk, Miranda Richardson in Blackadder. Elizabeth was also known for beheading people. Was the casting deliberate?(AndrewAnorak 19:21, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Queen of Hearts/Elizabeth 1

message: It's pretty much a necessity. 74.129.67.246 (talk) 05:54, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How can I see this?!
Talk:Doug's 1st Movie

message: The trivia section claims a DVD release was delayed.
Does that mean there is a chance of it in the future?
66.82.9.56 03:33, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD Release 

message: Doug's name is Doug Yancey Funnie, not McFarland
What the hell? I will edit with the correct names.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.200.119.128 (talk) 23:56, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Its Dough Walker. DoctorHver (talk) 03:32, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doug's Last name