Talk:Loyola Jesuit College

message: :Image:LJC logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:LJC logo.gif

message: http://www.loyolajesuit.org/entrance2011/advert.pdf
http://www.loyolajesuit.org/THISDAY_Publication.pdf
WhisperToMe (talk) 01:56, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Documents

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Loyola Jesuit College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080910185309/http://www.loyolajesuit.org/News/News71.pdf to http://www.loyolajesuit.org/News/News71.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:33, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Loyola Jesuit College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.nasarawastate.org/newsday/news/nasarawa/11220110025.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111030143451/http://www.loyolajesuit.org/entrance2011/advert.pdf to http://www.loyolajesuit.org/entrance2011/advert.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.thisdayonline.com/nview.php?id=35720
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Loyola Jesuit College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090628032804/http://www.loyolajesuit.org/Welcome.htm to http://www.loyolajesuit.org/Welcome.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:00, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have tagged this article as both advertising and Conflict of Interest. Hypernerd387 is now forumhopping and editwarring to get the promotional version of this article. But from this discussion it is loud and clear that he(?) has a clear intent to promote to get more prospective students in. And that is probably why he is also giving undue weight to the WEAC and the JAMB examinations and the Cowbell mathematics Competition by adding it two times to the article. The Banner talk 03:07, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it was moved by me to the bottom but one Hypernerd387 did not read properly and just banged it in again. And it does not help at all that you are forumshopping, editwarring and throwing with personal attacks. See No Personal Attacks. To disappoint you, it are not the administrators that have the last word. Wikipedia is build on consensus not shouting and editwarring. Personal attacks, like unjust reporting of vandalism or calling an editor "egoistical", can lead to a block (removal of editing rights). The Banner talk 19:34, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

text: You have been crying for help against evil me at "Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard" (rejected), "Wikipedia talk:Vandalism" (rejected), "Wikipedia talk:Administrator intervention against vandalism" (rejected). You desperately wanted the test results and the Cowbell in it, but failed to notice that it was already in it. Every improvement to get an article that is free of promotion is promptly reverted by you (and a bunch of IPs). Your argumentation is not more that a Wikipedia:Other stuff exists-argument. Not a proper reasoning why funding and standard facilities should be there. And with your remark from 15 February Prospective parents seek information about school facilities in deciding were to send their kids which is why this has always been included in the wiki page () you made clear that gaining more pupils is the purpose of the additions, what is plain advertising. If the school wants to advertise its facilities to parents, it should use an advertising medium, not an encyclopedia. The Banner talk 05:58, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Ow, and no: there were no administrators joining your side because on every other forum your appeals got rejected. Nor were there any administrators who gave content-related arguments here, pro or con. Just one new editor banging at the door. The Banner talk 06:18, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

text: And you sound desperate: "Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard" (rejected), "Wikipedia talk:Vandalism" (rejected), "Wikipedia talk:Administrator intervention against vandalism" (rejected). And read: Wikipedia:Other stuff exists again. But I will be interested when you find a school in a build up area that does not have classrooms... The Banner talk 16:13, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

text: You do not have a clue what you are doing here? Why did you put back the info about that/survivor? He has his own article, that info should be there. The Banner talk 13:16, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

text: Just answer my question: why did you put the info back about the singer? He has his own page, info about him belongs to that article, not in the school article. The Banner talk 13:37, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

text: You really do not have a clue what you are doing. Some competence is required, see WP:CIR. And read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. The Banner talk 13:37, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

text: In fact I am active on this article since June 2018 to keep the article neutral. Indeed often removing info from IPs or the Ljcwebmaster. The Banner talk 16:05, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertising and COI

message: Can someone review this edit with a brand new account restoring recently removed test results? The Banner talk 09:33, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remarkable edit