lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Swabi

message: Village Beka was the second largest town at the time of Hund /Hond empror.The firts largest was 
Lahor( Capital of Hund) and Beka was the biggest  town at the that time.
The new Beka is old enough about 285 years. The old Beka was replace by river indus, due to a flood and diveration of river . The new Beka came under the water and people move to the parallel side. Usaually they settle in thir own land on paralle side. The old Beka spilit in so many villages, now a days they are known to be , Beka, Nabi, Dari, Sala, Haryan, Balo, Zakariya, Bangla(Shukhat Khan land),Inbar till ziyada.
This the reason you can see the same clan people (Tajo/Taju Khel) which is one of the branch of yusufzai clan.
following clan of People are living peace fully in new village Beka
!Yusuf zai
! Sahibzadgan
! Khattak
! Balar Khel
This land produce very famous people throgh out the world. They not know only in country but some of them are very pupolar and settled abraod in UK & US.
Nero Surgen DR. Nisar Khan, was Lt General, talanted individual who got this honours. He was the first Army General with Mediciane Profession from Beka.
Fazal Akbar Khan (late), was Deputy Commissionar, performed his services at Dir operation( to combine Dir with Pakistan). He performed work in foregin office and abroad with different desgnations. He was 44 when he died. His graveyard in Beka Dari. He got four son's and Two daughters.
Ameen Khan, Aronatical engg (US),is the brother of Mr Akbar Khan.
Haji Mohabat Khan Late was social walfare activist and always gave his strenght to bring female literacy as equal to men in area.
He denoated his land for Girls, Primary, Girls High, childeren schools, Hospital and to grave yards.
he was very keen of education, due to his wish his son give his luxuary baunglow to Public school to facilitate people with good quality of education.
He got a four sons  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.0.205.182 (talk) 18:18, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beka 
Talk:Simeon (son of Jacob)

message: *Propose to merge the above here. I believe they are the same person (but may be mistaken). That article appears to have been lifted from the Jewish Encyclopedia. That's not a copyright issue but it means it is not in a good shape for this 21st century encyclopedia. Itsmejudith (talk) 16:25, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge of [[Simeon in rabbinic literature]] 

message: Dating within this article is inconsistent. For reasons of scholarship and neutrality, BCE should likely be adopted throughout. (BibleScholar (talk) 13:55, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dating system
Talk:Bilhah

message: Rashi is trying to explain Reuben's fall from grace without the benefit of 35:22, which is astonishing. This is an attempt to excise the whole Reuben incest story from Genesis.75.24.124.79 (talk) 07:12, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rashi is full of shit 

message: The second paragraph mentions Genesis 74:13. Genesis has only 50 chapters, so this verse does not exist  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.72.27.194 (talk) 05:46, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-existent verse
Talk:Valeo

message: was Valeo connected to a company called Kinby?
=== Valeo Interior Controls ===
This needs updating to reflect Valeo Interior Controls and Valeo Vision Systems. PD (talk) 20:25, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This needs updating to reflect Valeo Interior Controls and Valeo Vision Systems. PD (talk) 20:25, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valeo Interior Controls 
Talk:Naphtali

message: I think there should certainly be a pop culture reference section in the pages about Jacob and his 12 sons. For example: "Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat", which is a popular live theater musical made famous on broadway and a film starring Donny Osmund, competely mixes up the order of the sons making Judah one of the youngest and stating the Rachel was Jacob's favorite wife when both are completely false.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.64.241.110 (talk) 01:22, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pop Culture References 

message: It is INCREDIBLY ANNOYING to read the "some scholars bla bla bla postdiction aetology"-nonsense on EVERY SINGLE page relating to the 12 Tribes - cannot this disclaimer instead be posted on A SINGLE page for itself ? 
It makes for repetitive and useless reading.
:Each article must stand on it's own; not everyone is reading every article related to a topic, nor can you expect someone to read every article in order to find a "disclaimer" which should have been in each article. — al-Shimoni (talk) 20:40, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a "postdiction" (nothing claims to be a prediction).  Much else in the wording is pretentious. 151.200.41.108 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 04:23, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  postdiction aetology
Talk:Dan (son of Jacob)

message: Please consider renaming this article Dan, son of Jacob as per Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Bible#standardized_way_of_naming_articles_for_biblical_persons. Lemmiwinks2 (talk) 21:15, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: rename article

message: The paragraph, "According to the Book of Jubilees, Dan was born on 9 of 1915 he is also Rey's son (step)Elul. He was the father of Hushim, according to Gen 46:23. Samson was a descendant of Dan," which is near the top of the article, has some major problems. Dan's birthmonth is unspecified. The part "Rey's son (step)Elul," is hard to understand. Is Dan also known as Elul? Also, if only the grammar is fixed, shouldn't it be "Rey's stepson, Elul." Also, the sentence does not specify whether Dan was born in 1915 BCE or 1915 CE.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.195.88.33 (talk) 23:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sloppy Paragraph Alert
Template talk:Columbia

message: I significantly reworked the previously really ugly and disorganized template. Some explanations:
* Schools can fit in more than one category; Barnard and SEAS are the two examples.
* I did not also include the nursing school in the undergraduate category as its bachelor's degree program (yes, it does have one) is a specialized one only for those already with bachelor's degrees.
* I admit that dividing the graduate schools into two categories is somewhat arbitrary and primarily in order to keep one section from being much larger than the others. I think the distinction I've made, however--the "professional" law, business, and medicine schools on one side, and the "graduate" humanities, sciences, and social sciences on the other--is a reasonable, traditional, and justifiable one. YLee (talk) 09:44, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Major reorganization

message: I think we need some kind of link that says "don't confuse with Template:Colombia that will occur if this template is visited in the template namespace, but that won't show up if we put this template in an article. Any thoughts on how to do this?? Georgia guy (talk) 00:52, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dis-ambiguation
Talk:John Jay Hall

message: In the comic book "JSA Classified" #6, (Feb. 2006) Columbia University student housing is blown up by villains. I thought this might be noteable for this article. Lots42 (talk) 21:36, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional destruction 
Talk:Mount Sinai Morningside

message: Once Mt. SInai took over these properties, they became individual units within the Mt. Sinai Health System. I wonder if it's worth separating these pages into Mt. Sinai West (formerly Roosevelt) and Mt. Sinai St. Lukes. Both have a history and notoriety all their own prior to the merger that took place before Mt. Sinai took over. There would definitely be overlap. Even if the pages remain the same, the title should probably change. I'm an amateur though, so want to put these ideas out there before acting on them. Samuronin (talk)  05 May 2017 (UTC)
Agreed -- now that St. Luke's announced a new name and less entanglement re: Mount Sinai West. Ddnile (talk)  07 February 2017  —Preceding undated comment added 15:23, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated Name and Status

message: i wonder whether "every possible field of medicine except [a long list of fields]" is really factually accurate or tonally appropriate. 38.98.88.2 (talk) 19:38, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is the Syms Operating Theater actually a designated landmark? The 1987 Times article cited nearest to that claim actually contradicts it, as they report that while the building was "identified [...] 'highest priority'" in 1979 and a hearing held in 1985, the Landmarks Preservation Commission "never actually designated the building". I can't find any documentation indicating that has since changed. Web resources that mention Syms as a landmark mostly claim that it was designated in 1979, which would appear to be a misinterpretation on their part. FeRD_NYC (talk) 05:57, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Syms Operating Theater landmark status? 

message: Mount Sinai St. Luke's announced 07 February 2020 that it's new name is Mount Sinai Morningside, and that they are redefining the relationship between St. Luke's/Morningside and Mount Sinai West. I'm attempting to reflect on this page that news. Ddnile (talk)  07 February 2017  —Preceding undated comment added 15:28, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Rebranding status
Talk:Butler Library

message: I would say the present situation is preferable to having them merged. The RBML article now includes the content of the former Archives article.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 16:46, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge

message: I am suggesting we replace the lede image with the one I have uploaded here (a slightly revised version of the image that, when originally added, was reverted). Clearly, the current image is blurry and not up to the necessary quality standards. JSquish (talk) 20:34, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, there's no "clearly" about it.  However, this version of your image is superior to the previous version and better than the current image.  If you put it in the article I won't object, but I suggest you crop out some of the sky, which is unnecessary. BMK (talk) 20:37, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your willingness to work out a solution with me on this — I will recall for the future not to unilaterally replace main images on articles without first consulting the talk page for feedback. --JSquish (talk) 21:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good, and the image looks good in the article. Thanks. BMK (talk) 21:23, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed image change
Talk:Alfred Lerner Hall

message: Due to space constraints, few student activities have individual offices, the vast majority receiving only locker space.  
"The vast majority"? The only lockers in the building are for GS and other students. Hardly _any_ student activities have any space whatsoever.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.39.166.43 (talk) 09:08, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Thimarafushi (Thaa Atoll)

message: I have given this page a badly-needed copy edit but there is still work that needs to be done.  I simply don't understand some of the references, which indicates that explanation should be provided by someone familiar with the location.  I've cleaned up the English and deleted some unsupported statements.  One of the first things that needs to be provided is a proper citation for the 2006 statistics that are referenced throughout the article. Accounting4Taste 23:30, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

message: read the paragraph using adjectives 43.231.28.150 (talk) 15:51, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  english
Talk:Hogan Hall

message: Neither Hogan nor any other Columbia dorm is "reserved for fourth-year undergraduate students (seniors)".  Its occupants are all seniors because it is popular and because rising seniors get to choose their rooms first, not because any portion of it has been reserved for them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.144.201.12 (talk) 01:01, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of St. Anthony Hall members

message: I have been cleaning up and organizing the notable members' list. Another editor has joined in the effort, removing all remaining individuals who lack a Wikipedia article. I agreed with some, but not all of these removals. This is a reminder that a Wikipedia article is not required for notable member/alumni if adequate citations are included to prove notable. So, let's discuss whether to keep off or return the following to the list. 
* Lawrence Vest Stephens  Governor of Missouri  
* Bill Bamberger, cultural and social photographer and author. Teaches at Duke University’s Center for Documentary Studies His photos are in the U.S. Embassies. .
* Albert Conrad Kempton d'Ossché (1947-1990), influential performer, composer, recording artist and author on the Appalachian dulcimer. Co-founded the Kindred Gathering, the oldest dulcimer festival in the U.S. Later became a television producer and worked on The Wonder Years and Crime Story. 	
* Paul V. Applegarth, founding CEO of Millennium Challenge Corporation. Founding Managing Director, The Emerging Africa Infrastructure Fund. This is both Internationally important and was the main development project of Pres. George W Bush  
* Alexander "Sam" Aldrich, attorney and deputy police commissioner for New York City. Chair of New York's Cabinet Committee for Civil Rights. Chairman of the President's Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. The latter is an presidential appointment for a national leadership position  
Rublamb (talk) 11:12, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Ends up Lawrence Vest Stephens had an entry already, under his nickname Lon Stephens. Bamberger now has an article. Both meet requirement as notable.Rublamb (talk) 16:27, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notables
Talk:Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy

message: I badly want to keep this article from  being deleted but I'm having trouble tracking sources that I know exist due to the Institute's name coming up in the surveys it works on. Anyone have any aces up their sleeve? Travellingcari (talk) 01:43, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Improve
Talk:Human hunting

message: Animal hunting--222.64.223.104 (talk) 01:54, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If the case is well sourced, yes, feel free to add that data to the article. Akhran (talk) 16:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human hunting is the reaction of.... 

message: I was thinking that this article could be expanded to include other information pertaining to human hunting, outside of modern media, such as possibly a small section on the Spartan Crypteia, and other such examples of human hunting. Ed-dg (talk) 11:54, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact, when I translate the lemma to German Menschenjagd I would think primarily about historical huntings such as the hunt for slaves in Africa (to be shipped to America) or the hunt for jews by the Einsatztruppen in Poland. Or does the English expression human hunting limits itself to hunts comparable to fox hunts with hounds? --Ziko (talk) 15:39, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Inclusion of Factual, Historical Instances 

message: This page is in :Category:Urban legends but the content presented only refers to factual hunting. Clearly there are lots of urban legends about human hunts; some text about them should be included in the article. pburka (talk) 23:57, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urban legend 

message: Hoooooooooorn my love. Hoooooorn 105.160.93.12 (talk) 09:32, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sound of a horn
Talk:WKVR (FM)

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WYAY (Flint, Michigan). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:46, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  WYAY (Flint, Michigan) listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Edward H. Shortliffe

message: It would be appropriate to remove all the current items on the References list and to replace them with some or all of the following (all of which are external references not written by the subject of the article):
Greenes RA, Buchanan BG, Ellison D.  Presentation of the 2006 Morris F. Collen Award to Edward H.
(Ted) Shortliffe.   J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14:376 –385. See http://www.jamia.org/cgi/reprint/14/3/376 
http://www.flinn.org/news/847/print
http://www.biomedical-engineering-online.com/content/5/1/61
http://www.cert-hit.org/Investigators/EShortliffe_bio.htm
http://opa.ahsc.arizona.edu/newsroom/news/2007/ua-appoints-edward-h-shortliffe-md-phd-dean-college-medicine-phoenix 
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/09/100914171327.htm
http://www.nyam.org/news/press-releases/2012/2011-04-02.html
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=204335
--Shortliffe (talk) 16:17, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Harold Rugg

message: Why does the article have to "adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons"? Harold Rugg was long-lived indeed, but if he were alive today he would be 123 years old! Rugg lived from 1886-1960. This article is poorly written, overly short, and completely misses Rugg's achievements or significance. I'm writing a graduate paper about him this week, and when I am done will come back to improve this entry. Dan Quigley (talk) 20:49, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that because Mr. Rugg was in existence he is considered a living person, as opposed to a table.  I agree, this extremely brief entry misses his influence on the history of Education.  I'm going to do some research and add in some content as well. Jslist (talk) 14:53, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Living Person? 

message: This article should include references to what happened because of Rugg's creation of the first textbook. Jslist (talk) 14:53, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of Textbooks 

message: The Library of Congress catalog entry and all OCLC catalog entries for the first edition of this work give the copyright date as 1928--rather than 1926, as stated in the article. A copy in my possession agrees with the 1928 date. Based on this, I am changing those references in the article.Sws1943 (talk) 20:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for noting this. I don't see that you did change the dates, so I've done so. ★NealMcB★ (talk) 00:20, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect date for first publication of "The child-centered school"
Talk:Simulation software

message: I think that the term simulation software is more commonly used these days than computer simulation.
Carl142 23:42, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Terminology

message: Simulation is not Imitation (see first sentence), that would be emulation .
A simulator does not try to mimic the real system, but is normally used just because it is different from the real system (e.g. in cost, speed or observability of specific details).--84.189.136.35 (talk) 15:56, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Imitation 

message: Should this article be merged with Computer Simulation?  No.  While computer simulation may use simulation software, simulation software does not need a computer to run and can operate completely indepedently of a traditional computer system.  There are numerous examples of simulation software that runs on dedicated devices such as programmable automation controllers (PACs), distributed control systems (DCS), and SCADA systems that use microprocessor-based controllers and run simulation software to emulate and compare various theoretical process conditions with actual values measured.  Anthony2357 (talk) 15:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: I feel like the last (long) paragraph of the General Simulation section was a good-faith effort to describe the primary methodologies, but that it appears to cut and paste something from a middle of a reference text. It uses references to undefined terms, jumps into the benefits/pitfalls without describing the process first, and combines everything into a giant undifferentiated paragraph. I am not knowledgable enough to pick it apart (I came here to learn about it), but it seems like someone familiar with the topic could make some substantial improvements here... --Sam (talk) 15:49, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: At least Earwig finds no WP:CV issue. ~Kvng (talk) 14:11, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Simulation
Talk:Meritorious Unit Citation

message: The correct name for the waterway is the Persian Gulf, and should not be referred to as the Arabian Gulf when using the English Language.  The Persian Gulf is the preferred term in United States English, UK English and United Nations, as well as the Wikipedia naming policy.  I do not disagree with a mention in the article Arab World which mentions that the term Arabian  Gulf as a term used by certain Arab countries, but I believe that by putting Arab/Persian Gulf, it only serves to confuses people.  As there are two 'gulfs' around Arabia.  The Red Sea (known as the Arabian Gulf in certain publications and the Persian Gulf.(JosephLondon 09:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It really doesn't matter what the 'correct term' in other senses may be - in this article, and in this particular citation, the correct term is as per the quoted reference - there is no need to continually revert it back to "Arabian", or to add [sic], as there is simply no error in grammar or spelling involved - just the use of an alternative term. PalawanOz 09:26, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Persian Gulf]]

message: Any Idea what happens when a warship(or Squadron, regiment etc) with the same name as one who previously earned a MUC is commissioned? Does it inherit the Citation as it would a battle honour? AlexanderFrancis (talk) 10:25, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inherrited Citations? 
Talk:Bald (disambiguation)

message: First, Agent 47 is not a person, hes a fictional person, so theres that. Second, unless this is going to become the complete list of bald people, its inappropriate to add random bald people, simply keeping it to a list of people known for being bald (such as the various monarchs "the Bald"). And then some, such as Clare Balding, don't even make sense as a complete list, because she is not bald, or known for anything to do with being bald, she merely has a name that sounds similar. 76.69.68.248 (talk) 06:23, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  People
Talk:WATT

message: My father told me that he had worked at WATT before I was born.  He said that back then WATT was part of a small radio network known as the Paul Bunyan Network.  Does anyone know more about that configuration?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C5:4200:44B0:80F7:AFC6:B826:B07C (talk) 22:01, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Sukiyaki Western Django

message: Any chance this film will be released statewide? -R.G. 07:16, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to its official website, www.sukiyakimovie.com, it's coming to NY on Aug 29th and LA on Sep 12th. 71.202.104.229 (talk) 21:33, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

text: I'm watching it right now on TMC, so it's already stateside.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.84.191.230 (talk) 12:22, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S. Release ? 

message: I went to a press screening of this film last night.  There is no colon in its name, so it should be moved to just "Sukiyaki Western Django".  --David Shankbone 14:17, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colon 

message: The US dvd is only 98 minutes.  The original japanese is 120 minutes.  Why would they cut a half hour out of the movie??  What are they thinking???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.161.94.32 (talk) 20:23, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  R-rated cut