lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Morcar

message: Morcar's article says, "In 1065, the Northumbrians revolted against their Earl Tostig, who was replaced by Morcar" and at the top of the page it says, "He was himself the earl of Northumbria from 1065 to 1066, when he was replaced by William the Conqueror with Copsi." Simple timeline: * 1065 Tostig deposed, Morcar installed * 1066 Morcar deposed Copsi installed. However, on Copsi's page it says that in March 1067 copsi travelled to Barking, paid Homage to Harold and, "In return, William made Copsi earl of Northumbria" when according to Morcar's page he already is earl of Northumbria and has been since the previous year.
The question then is when exactly was Copsi made earl of Nothumbria? Was it a) soon after the invasion to depose Morcar, and so Copsi travelled to Barking to pay homage to the man who made him an earl, or b) after the battle of Hastings, Copsi sees which way the wind blows so pays homage to William I at Barking and is rewarded with the title of earl of Northumbria?
It would of course help if articles had inline citations so that we could tell which "facts" are supposed to come from which sources and then check for ourselves. But, you know, whatever. Cottonshirtτ 05:16, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm rather confused by the chronology as well. The article states that he ceased to be the Earl of Northumbria in 1066, but then it is said he and his brother Edwin "fled William's court and returned to their earldoms" to lead a rebellion in 1068. After submitting to William shortly afterwards they were both pardoned, implying he was allowed to retain his earldom right up until 1071 (like his brother) when they both fled William's court for the final time. 2A00:23C6:4182:9500:6802:D077:1AC9:E32C (talk) 01:43, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology of events
File talk:Revised petrol use urban density.jpg

message: Is Los Angeles really almost as dense as New York? I find this to be on the edge of plausibility. NYC is geographically large, but much of this is water, and it seems misleading to include it in an "area per capita" calculation. Toppler 18:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, the original graph indicates NY's annual per-capita gasoline use is less than LA's, yet the revised graph appears to indicate the opposite, which is contrary to pretty much everything I've ever seen. How did Newman and Kenworthy obtain their figures (e.g. are they based on metropolitan areas, city limits, or what?) and how was the data obtained for the revised graph? Toppler 04:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah you have a good point... i honestly don't know. The original one made sense to me, but the new one. Hmm if only my maths was better. Let me try and explain what i think is going on, the first version is very simple x, y. The new version is gasoline use, per person, by density... okay. But NY surely does'nt... Ill try and get to the bottom of it. I guess it will look like work anyway. Bjrobinson 16:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Natore District

message: THIS IS ONE OF THE MAIN BAZARS IN NATORE SADAR.ACTUALLY IT IS RESIDENCIAL AS WELL AS BUSINESS AREA.SO IT MIXES BOTH TYPES OF PEOPLE.RAJBARI & UTTORA GONOBHABON ARE THE MAIN INTERESTING LOCATIONS OF NATORE BUT BESIDES IT MANY OTHER PLACES ARE THERE WHICH ATTRACT YOUNG GENERATION TO PASS THERE LEISURE.AMONG THEM 'MODONER PUKUR PAR' IS MOST POPULAR.IT IS IN KAPURIAPATTY WHICH IS IN THE NORTH SIDE OF NICHABAZAR.
And central mosque , ground floor called mosjid market is popular for selling mobile.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.134.11.139 (talk) 16:27, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: NICHABAZAR,NATORE
Talk:Antipope Laurentius

message: ... this article should be improved? It is quite poorly written. --Ciacchi 18:06, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It took a while, but I think I have made it better. -- llywrch (talk) 07:08, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't you think... 
Talk:Annas

message: Some evidence is needed to back the claim that Annas was influential after 15 AD.
The account given in the Gospel of John is evidence of Annas' ongoing influence. Chbrooking (talk) 18:42, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Because I may be mistaken, I am reluctant to edit the problem text.
I think that five words have been added to the disambiguation phrase which do not belong. I suspect anti-semitism but I may be mistaken. The five words which I think do not belong are "with yo yo shiv the."
68.200.7.4 (talk) 23:35, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Heading
Talk:Armenicum

message: This article reads like an advertisement; I've found no peer-reviewed studies showing that Armenicum "fights HIV and a number of associated diseases". On the contrary, a BBC report suggests that this drug is useless at best. It's certainly not regularly prescribed for treating HIV infection. Trezatium 18:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality
Talk:Molly Picon

message: 1.  Table "Filmography" is unclear.  Item Car 54, Where Are You? is listed w/out any flag indicating it's not a film, like the other entries.  Add phrase "(TV series)".
2.  Either list all TV appearances or none.  For example, her outstanding appearance on the Dec. 6, 1968 episode of Gomer Pyle, U.S.M.C. is missing; see this IMDB record.
Jimlue (talk) 18:40, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Table
Talk:Tomb of Adham Khan

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 08:17, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: An excellent image of Adham Khan's Tomb, though under copyright, for reference (Ekabhishek (talk) 09:58, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Flickr set - Adham Khan's Tomb --Ekabhishek (talk) 12:18, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image Source
Wikipedia talk:Don't cite essays or proposals as if they were policy

message: I never see people do that. Instead of saying, "The WP:COATRACK essay says..." they say, "You're not supposed to add this kind of content to articles! See WP:COATRACK." Compy book (talk) 13:04, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advice that's never followed 

message: The whole problem here is the "cite" mentality in how this is written.  It's out-of-step with actual Wikipedian perception and practice.  When editors  an essay they are not "citing" it as if it's a policy or guideline.
When someone actually does  one, then they're making a mistake, and we can detect that. One editor used to do this a lot at WP:RM: "Per WP:YOGURT", etc.  Their essays (which did not reflect consensus) got userspaced by WP:MFD, and the "WP:" shortcuts to them were deleted by WP:RFD.  I.e., we already have effective process for dealing with this problem, which is quite infrequent.
When someone links to or mentions an essay as part of their rationale, it means "This page presents a carefully articulated argument, which has been archived there and refined over time, to save everyone the trouble to typing the gist of it out over and over again or having to read through someone typing it all out over and over again."  It is not offering an essay in place of a WP:P&G page, it's saving everyone the time and pain of lengthy rehash of common debate points.  "That's just an essay" is not a sensible response to people using essay-provided reasoning, unless they're offering the essay  actual P&G, or against actual consensus in some other form (e.g. procedural rules like how to do an fD properly), or against reliable sources.
As a secondary matter: This whole page doesn't actually apply to  essays; we have several that effectively have the community buy-in level of policies or guidelines, most notably (off the top of my head), WP:COMMONSENSE, WP:BRD, WP:INDY, WP:NOTHERE, WP:CIR, WP:DUCK, WP:ROPE, WP:AADD, WP:ASPERSIONS, WP:CCOS, and WP:WIARM, among several others. They've even been directly incorporated-by-reference into P&G pages, and several are directly integrated into process, including sanctions.  It is actually perfectly fine to  these pages in the same way we do P&G pages because they do in fact enjoy that level of consensus. (Some have a different banner, for "Information page" or "Supplement", but they have the hierarchical authority level – to the extent the community even believes in one – of essays, and are categorized as subcategories of essays.)
I'm skeptical this page ever really accurately reflected our community approach to essays, but it certainly does not in 2018, even if some of its basic observations and advice remain valid. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  11:25, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  This badly needs rewriting
Talk:Anthropological criminology

message: Would it be possible for you to add more to your article? I do find the topic very interesting and I would love to see where else you take this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cfairwal (talk • contribs) 22:50, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: I liked it. Trinidad44 (talk) 21:06, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice
Talk:Dogbreath

message: I'll add the image of the cover for issue #15 when it becomes available. There are other bits and bobs I want to add but at the moment the 2000 AD site is down and so I can't do the fact checking. (Emperor 18:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanding
Talk:Ebba Koch

message: In Early Modern India section, the last sentence originally read She has also contributed to Mughal painting and...
This would imply that Koch had created Mughal paintings, but I not knowing in what way she has contributed I chose to indicate her as 'recording', but that may not be the case either. Clarification appreciated. 
--Haruth (talk) 20:32, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit Notes
Talk:Comparison of Linux Live CDs

message: I don't see the point of having a license part because there are so many licenses in a Linux distribution,
for example a desktop using GNOME has the GPL for the kernel, the LGPL for GNOME, and the x11 License for X.org.
There isn't so much difference between the licenses of the Linux distributions.
How can a distro fit on a cd and not a dvd? It's still a compatible media for the image type.Orthuberra 08:07, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Older Discussion

message: Would be nice to know which ones are available USB ...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.84.78.209 (talk) 21:48, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur. I'd like to add a column for Boots from USB stick. I'm guessing that means I get to add a purple column with question marks, which will eventually be flagged "yes" or "no". Unless someone else has already done the work... samwaltz 06:56, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: USB - Live Linux

message: This list continues to attract spam and non-notable entries.  To manage this, I think we need to follow WP:LIST closer and have inclusion criteria.  Until we come up with something better, we should only list entries that have their own articles. --Ronz (talk) 03:05, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone ahead and removed entries without their own articles. --Ronz (talk) 18:22, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: List Inclusion criteria

message: How about a column for whether or not the distro is easily installable from the live distro media?  I assume some distros are just designed to be used from the media, and others are live distros that you can install to hard disk from the same media if you like. zorruno (talk) 03:36, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Permanent installation from live distro

message: Since Kubuntu and Xubuntu are really just versions of Ubuntu with a different environment, wouldn't it make more sense to have these listed as based on Debian? —Jake Wasdin (talk) 13:33, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kubuntu/Xubuntu "based on" Ubuntu? 

message: I have removed the WikiProject tag, as this article is either a redirect or deleted. If you oppose, please restore the tag. Thank you, fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 16:10, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Computing
Talk:Mughal architecture

message: There is nothing in the article that summarizes the features of this style of architecture. Someone with subject matter knowledge needs to add this material. Lou Sander (talk) 14:38, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please describe the style 

message: Someone has tried to include lists of Mughal-style structures, but hasn't done it in proper Wikipedia style. The result is a mishmash of words at the end of the Mughal bridges section. You can make some sense of it by looking at the material in edit view. Lou Sander (talk) 14:40, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: , I'm moving the discussion here so you can make proper use of the article talk page for your suggestions. As I already explained here and on your user talk page, there isn't enough room in the article to keep adding images indiscriminately without also disrupting the layout and readability of the article. There is also a gallery at the end of the article which can accommodate extra images if needed. You also repeated the Taj Mahal image that is already in the lead while removing the panoramic image for no good reason, and you added an image of the Shalimar Gardens even though there already is one in the "Gardens" section right below. You can see general guidelines on images at MOS:IMAGES. R Prazeres (talk) 09:29, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: They are obviously disregarding WP:ONUS. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 21:26, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Agreed - and thanks R Prazeres for your work expanding this article - much needed. Johnbod (talk) 22:06, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images and article layout
Talk:Parikrama

message: After all this effort some one wants to merge this article with Pradakshina. It would be unfair, since the contents of the article Parikrama (religious practice) relate mostly to specifically named, very popular, Parikramas of rivers,hills,towns, etc which are practiced north of the Vindhyas. It is the most popular practice by that name in the whole of North India and also in Gujarat which is also part of the Narmada valley. In fact, the other article is not even evaluated into Stub class. All three articles named have been in existence for quite some years - Parikarama from May 2005, Pradaskina from October 2005 and Circumambuation from Novemebr 2005 - (surprisingly all of them without any merger tag posted on any of them by any one) and I only expanded one of them and there goes the merger symbol since it got the DYK acceptance. The article as posted now should be retained as it contains much more information than any other on the subject of Parikrama or Pradakshina or Circumambulation. The right thing to do would be to merge some of the contents of the Pradakshina article into the Parikrama article.I suppose Administrators have to decide if the merger tag is to be retained or not. If the administrators feel that the DYK is unjustified and C - grade is not proper, then I have no objection to the whole of my text being undone on this article. I also feel that even if  I had expanded any of the other articles with these additional text material and posted as DYK then also this tag would have been posted.--Nvvchar (talk) 17:04, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nvvchar, i think you have some misconceptions. Merging the info is NOT deleting info here. It's just adding to info here from Pradakshina. Support merger. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 11:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

text: ;Thank you for the clarification. No hard feelings. I will add from Pradakshina article text which would enhance the contents of the Parikrama article, such as Shayana Pradakshina and  number of Pradaskshinas. Since the merger has to be done by an adminsitrator only, I will leave it to you for further needful, please.--Nvvchar (talk) 15:19, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  No. Another misconception: The merger can be done by anyone, an administrator need not be involved. Though a WP:CONSENSUS should be formed. Since Parikrama and Pradakshina are synonymous, i see no reason why anyone would object. Only which should be a redirect should be discussed. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 17:57, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: What is the right Sanskrit spelling (you can find some different romanizations: pradakṣina and pradakṣiṇa)?
And possibly there are some more related words:
* "Clockwise": apasavya (cf. apasavyavat, apasavyaṃkṛ)
* "Counter-clockwise": savya
--Djadjko (talk) 03:32, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling and related terms 

message: Is the ritual really called "Parikrama" by, for example, Indian Muslims? In another Wiki article (Circumambulation#Islam), it's just called "Tawaf", in Arabic. --Djadjko (talk) 03:48, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parikrama in Islam
Talk:Ye Olde Fighting Cocks

message: I uploaded a new picture of Ye Old Fighting Cocks and I took the liberty of putting the new picture at the top, just because it shows the name of the pub.  If I have p***ed anyone off, please feel free to move the pictures around again. Legis 18:28, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: If this really is the oldest pub in Britain, when are we claiming it was founded? A few dates seem to be thrown around here, but its not clear which (if any) is supposed to be the important one Woscafrench (talk) 01:04, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't believe this question still has not been answered, more than two years after it was first posted. I wondered exactly the same thing after reading the article, "So, how old is it?", and came here expecting to start a new thread. I guess nobody cares much about this pub if no one bothers to furnish such basic information when asked. I vote for declaring the Burger King in Leicester Square the oldest pub in Britain, assuming no one will bother to challenge me.--Jim10701 (talk) 01:53, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: One of the reference links - this one: http://www.stalbanshistory.org/page_id__544.aspx - will help. AdventurousMe (talk) 04:29, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Er...So how old is it then?
Talk:Roshnai Gate

message: Anyone have any info on :File:Roshnai-gate%2819th%29.JPG (author, date, etc)? -- Infrogmation (talk) 12:26, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Steve Smith (drummer)

message: The part about his childhood, early music experiences should a separate section, maybe with the personal info too. Should be expanded or repharsed: it's very choppy at the end now. Corrigann 18:34, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there a reason the discography is formatted the way it is?
KConWiki 03:32, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Layout of discography

message: There is only one reference cited for this entire article and it's a book by Randy Jackson which has nothing to do with Steve Smith? I'm not a big enough Smith fan to have enough knowledge to improve it, otherwise I might attempt to fix it. If you add info then cite your sources. Somebody had the ambition to go find all the info about his drum kits but yet couldn't cite the source? Higher standards people please.   Status4 (talk) 15:14, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: @Status4This is an old post, but ironic. @80s Sam has been going around (2020+ til recently) to several Journey members wiki pages and adding info about their career that is incorrect and unsourced. Steve Smith was never an official member of Montrose. No matter what the Montrose wiki says—it’s incorrect. A wiki can’t rely on another wiki to prove its fact in a circular reference kind of way. (Example: “Steve was a member of Montrose. The Montrose wiki said he was.” And around and around.) No matter what Sam tries to source with irrelevant and not applicable source material. Not one of the references say Steve was a member of Montrose. Montrose disbanded in 1976. The wiki says that and is sourced. Ronnie release a solo album in 1978 and toured to support it. Steve was on that tour. End of story. KaytieKay (talk) 22:45, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: References?
Talk:Becta

message: Every framework agreement results in a set of contracts between Becta and all the suppliers.  Becta gives you a copy of these contracts if you ask for it under the Freedom of Information Act.  In the future, these contracts could be hosted at: http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/ For now I am willing to put copies of them on my computer that can be linked to, like the infrastructure one I got last week. Goatchurch 18:34, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The contracts themselves 
Talk:Changdev, Jalgaon

message: There are some legends that I heard about the place. I am not sure I should include that. Also Maharshtra Tourism guide shows hot water spring in this place, but I could not locate this.
I plan to upload some images soon.--Ckshayin 18:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Industrial Areas Foundation

message: *unknown user added comment in the article
*THis organization was not created by that guy. Please fix.
*per IAF website, (http://www.industrialareasfoundation.org/iafaffiliates/iafaffiliatesso.htm)
CHANGE is an affiliate of the IAF, so I am removing this comment.
Scarykitty 18:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Initial comments, October 2006 
Talk:Gabriela Adameșteanu

message: Ah, but, given that my translation is the correct one, the question is: is her English-language biography authoritative? I say no, and that we can make that correction. Is the novel commonly known under that name in English: probably not – it probably isn't known under any name in English, but if it is, then I await evidence on which name it is usually called by. If that name includes "the", then I would concede the point. Biruitorul 18:42, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The thing is that the book is actually called Dimineaţă pierdută. We also have the excerpt from it that does not use the "the" (presumably because it reflects the published translation). Dahn 18:54, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. Again I fall victim to reliance on ro.wiki for accuracy. Biruitorul 21:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For a change, they go with selective use of diacritics instead of no diacritics at all. ;) Dahn 21:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The

message: is there any proof that her mother was removed from that post just because some authorities wanted so, and not because her lack of competences? Anonimu 20:33, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed