Talk:Edinburgh Review

message: The "current" (1984–) magazine doesn't appear to have been published since 2014, but I can't find anything explicitly saying that. GrindtXX (talk) 20:19, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither the British Library nor the National Library of Scotland catalogue says on-line that it has ceased publication, but the NLS's run ends with no. 140 of 014 and the BL's with no. 141 of 2014. The magazine's own web site shows only no. 141 of 2014. It always came out erratically (which they sometimes concealed by declaring a "double issue" with two issue numbers) so it would not have been clear when it had come to an end. Did the subsidy from the Scottish Arts Council stop? NRPanikker (talk) 00:41, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's pretty conclusive evidence that it's dormant, and probably deceased. In addition, the Eurozine website says it was a partner of the Eurozine network from February 2007 to December 2012. I'm going to make some adjustments to the article to reflect that information. GrindtXX (talk) 11:50, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Ceased publication?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Edinburgh Review. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6BEjVNn13?url=http://www.englit.ed.ac.uk/edinburghreview/issues/pdf/er01.pdf to http://www.englit.ed.ac.uk/edinburghreview/issues/pdf/er01.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Edinburgh Review. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110930084053/http://www.stokenewingtonquakers.org.uk/nbhist.html to http://stokenewingtonquakers.org.uk/nbhist.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:50, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Edinburgh Review. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130117062700/http://edinburgh-review.com/ to http://edinburgh-review.com//
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:42, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article should be devoted to the third of the four titles, and its content greatly extended to cover its treatment of the Romantic poets. The other three titles do not qualify on notability. Valetude (talk) 13:18, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, with some qualifications. I've often thought something similar. I never had the time for it myself, however; just too many other things I've been involved in, both on and off Wikipedia. As for notability, I think the other three are notable enough for some kind of Wikipedia mention, but, absolutely, the third Edinburgh Review is in another league altogether. A revolutionary publication of its kind. Certainly, more could be said about its treatment of the Romantic poets; but there was much more in there than criticism of contemporary poetry: other kinds of literature, politics, history, science, political economy, and on and on. A fascinating creation. All four of its founding editors are themselves notable enough to have articles here about them: Francis Jeffrey, Sydney Smith, Henry Brougham, and Francis Horner. The third Edinburgh Review certainly has not had justice done it in this current Wikipedia article. --Alan W (talk) 04:25, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emphasis 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The, Or the Critical Journal Edinburgh Review. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.   Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:12, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The, Or the Critical Journal Edinburgh Review" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]