lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Old Eucha, Oklahoma

message: The location of Old Eucha, Oklahoma is not south of Lake Eucha, that is an aerial topical graphic mistake. It is however from the center of Lake Eucha and north up to Old Eucha Cemetery. We the The Descendants of those families that walked the Trail of Tears and formed Old Eucha know where it's at 100% better than anyone. 75.107.73.226 (talk) 10:05, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Location Old Eucha, Oklahoma. 

message: 36.3574841, -94.8815007 which is the Old Eucha Schoolhouse located in Old Eucha. The area of Tag Flats and Old Eucha Needs to be switched. The Old Eucha Schoolhouse "Is Not" in Tag Flats, Tag Flats should be where Old Eucha is located now on Google Maps and Old Eucha Should be where Tag Flats. 75.107.73.226 (talk) 10:18, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Old Eucha is not anywhere close to Tagg Flats. The location of Old Eucha, Oklahoma is not south of Lake Eucha but close to the middle area of the lake on the north side. I know because my family owned stores and lived in the town of Old Eucha, Oklahoma before Lake Eucha was built. A lot of my family went to school at Old Eucha and are buried in the Old Eucha Cemetery. Whom ever marked Old Eucha on the south side of Lake Eucha close to Kenwood and Tagg Flats was wrong and apparently had no real information on this area. Driving wise, the Old Eucha site and Tagg Flats are almost 10 miles apart but as the crow fly's it would be approximately 3 to 4 miles. Why wont this mistake be corrected? 216.99.23.9 (talk) 01:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Eucha Location Is
Talk:Christiane Desroches Noblecourt

message: I'm not entirely convinced that we have the details of this process quite right. The original French article is  a little ambiguous and it would be useful if anyone with knowledge of how the move was achieved could correct/elaborate on the present description.... WjBscribe 02:02, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving the temple of Amada
Talk:Pilika (Suikoden)

message: After double-checking with Suikosource, I removed the final line, "It is unsure if this is true or why but later on Pilika goes back around the Jowston area around the time of suikoden III." as it was not confirmed (or even hinted at!) by anyone. Furthermore, I felt that "It is unsure if this is true" immediatly discredited it. Naxen 23:02, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jowston
Talk:Howard Garns

message: I believe there are inaccuracies in this article. I have a small collection of old Indy phone books and R L Polk City Directories.
Here is what I've found:
October 1962 Indianapolis And Metropolitan Area Telephone Book from Indiana Bell
Howard S Garns listed as an architect working in an office called 'Garns And Moore & Associates' located in the Knights of Pythia building.
Dagget Naegele & Daggett Inc with offices at 567 Westfield Boulevard
Wiley Geo listed but no work information is shown.
Robt H Hindman listed but no work information is shown
Indianapolis and Suburban Telephone Directory October 1950 from Indiana Bell
Howard S Garns listed as an architect working at the Knights of Pythia Building.
The classified telephone directory (known by the modern name 'Yellow Pages') shows Howard S Garns under the heading 'Architects' with an office at the KofP building.
The same section and heading shows Daggett Robert Frost & Associates with an address of 350 E Fall Creek Pkwy N Dr.
There is a Wiley Geo and a Wiley Geo L listed but no work information given.
Robt H Hindman listed but no work details.
R L Polk & Co's 1947 Indianapolis City Directory
Howard S Garns is listed as a draftsman for Robert Daggett
Robert Daggett's office is listed as 23 E Ohio (Hume-Mansur Building)
Wiley Geo listed as an 'engineer' but other employment info shown.
Robert H Hindman listed as a draftsman for Daggett.
Interestingly enough, the 1941 Polk's Directory lists Howard S Garns as an architect in the Pythia building sharing office space with J W Moore & Sons (construction engineers). It seems he may have been self employed...went to work for someone else...went back to self employment. Thus I will admit that my lack of data from '62-'67 could reveal that maybe Garns went back to work for Daggett. Of course, his entry in the 1943 Polk may explain him switching out of self-employment. His employer in 1943 is listed as the United States Army.
I realize I have a little bit of a gap in my data, but I believe that there is either an inaccuracy in the dates and/or places of employment or the article is written in such a way that a reader might think that Garns worked for Daggett in the same time frame that Wiley was a draftsman for Daggett.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Conanian (talk • contribs) 20:37, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracies?
MediaWiki talk:Uploadnologintext

message: I have created Wikipedia:Images for Upload. Can you change the text to inform unregestered users tbat they can suggest an image that is online for creation there.
Example: You can suggest a free or fair use image on the internet for upload at Wikipedia:Images for Upload.
Thanks--Natl1 (Talk Page) (Contribs) 20:49, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Chick Bowen 20:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

message: The text should say and link to Wikipedia:Files for upload instead of images for upload, as that is the new name of the page. Logan Talk Contributions 16:22, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: —GFOLEY FOUR— 01:01, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request
Talk:John, King of Saxony

message: I removed the ordinal from the article title since he does not seem to have been known as "John I".
*"König Johann von Sachsen"
*"König Johann I. von Sachsen"
*"King John of Saxony"
*"King John I of Saxony"
Olessi 20:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: "Johann Nepomuk Maria Joseph Anton Xaver Vincenz Aloys Franz de Paula Stanislaus Bernhard Paul Felix Damasus" Olessi 20:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full name 

message: is this the same king john who translated 'the divine comedy' and has a statue in the centre of dresden?--81.101.3.9 19:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  anyhoo 

message: I am reverting the ancestry to better reflect the names of the articles and to bypass redirects. The only standard for consistency in royalty article names is WP:NC(NT), which names kings, emperors and their consorts as Name of Place, other royals as Title Name of Place and lesser sovereigns and holders of substantive titles as Name, Title of Place. Charles 03:10, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What's wrong with redirects? 24.57.196.130 04:27, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Talk:William I of Württemberg#What's wrong with redirects?. Charles 04:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestry 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks 20:34, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: John of Saxony →  – Avoid confusion with similarly named people. Векочел (talk) 12:43, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Support per nominator.  Killuminator (talk) 14:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Support - I was going to boldly move this as I already have done with Albert, King of Saxony. John of Saxony (disambiguation) should also be moved to John of Saxony. estar8806 (talk) ★ 20:56, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 September 2023
Talk:Castor and Pollux (Prado)

message: The Dioscuri are represented in many works of sculpture, both free-standing and relief, ancient and post-Renaissance. Many further unidentified male pairs have had "Castor and Pollux" optimistically applied to them at one time or another, notably the Horse Tamers of the Quirinal. --Wetman 20:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Very good point - can you think of a better/more specific title (eg Castor and Pollux (Prado)), and then we could make this page into a list for all statues referred to under this title? Neddyseagoon - talk 10:46, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Organogenesis

message: Bryozoa don't fit the description of what each germ layer develops into. The larval endoderm appears to be completely lost during metamorphosis (after settlement on a substrate), while most of the adult tissue (including the gut) is derived from the ectoderm. Should this be noted in the article? Also, should it be described in a separate heading? Rolf Schmidt (talk) 05:50, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bryozoans
Talk:Foday Sankoh

message: redirects to this page, so i added special:search/Sankoh to a hatnote for readers searching for other Sankoh's. it seems the software has changed and special:Search/Sankoh no longer takes the reader to the search results for that term, but instead the Sankoh redirect. because of this i have added a "?" to Special:Search/?Sankoh to stop this from happening. obviously a disambiguation page is preferable but i, as a lowly IP, can not create one. would some wikipedian pls create this DAB page for the other Sankoh's kthx. :^) 173.85.193.129 (talk) 00:36, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sankoh redirect 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sankoh. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 27#Sankoh until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:57, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sankoh" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 
Talk:Klimt University of Vienna Ceiling Paintings

message: Since this is basically the same article as Medicine (klimt painting) I decided to copy and paste the short amount of discussion there here. --Beefybot 21:08, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Edit history seems to have itself been edited, deleting all but the original discussion here, and de-linking user names. JNW 15:32, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit history

message: How did Gustav Klimt die?--xgmx (T | C | D | R | DR)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.244.36.66 (talk) 16:52, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  death 

message: The URL says Medicine_(Kilmt_Painting) and not Medicine_(Klimt_Painting).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.160.94.201 (talk) 15:38, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kilmt or Klimt?
Talk:Henry de Bracton

message: I just deleted the article's silly statement that "the king was viewed as the Pope of England in fulfilling the role of Jesus Christ in England."  This statement was falsely sourced to Plunknett's Concise History of the Common Law, which can be viewed and searched here  --Other Choices (talk) 10:42, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the king was viewed as the Pope of England in fulfilling the role of Jesus Christ in England." 

message: That looks like Windsor Castle about a century before it was built  -  by Edward III, not Henry III. Valetude (talk) 02:42, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windsor Castle?
Talk:Shen Woo

message: The 'striking similarities' to Chad and Bunshichi Tawara since Shen Woo isn't really taking from them in a literal point. If we were to say that Shen has 'striking similarities' to these guys then there could be about 50 more guys written just because they are similar in style.
I don't think it should be stated unless SNKP really said so, like Benimaru. Also there's too much trivia stuff. Penpen35 20:33, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Albert, King of Saxony

message: Article should be without the ordinal, as he is not referred to as "Albert I of Saxony". 
*"König Albert von Sachsen"
*"König Albert I. von Sachsen"
*"King Albert of Saxony"
*"King Albert I of Saxony"
Olessi 21:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: The redirect Albert, Margrave of Meissen (1934–2012) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  DrKay (talk) 07:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Albert, Margrave of Meissen (1934–2012)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:List of metropolitans of Montenegro

message: Sideshow Bob, there's one problem - Mitrofan Ban wasn't the head of the Montenegrin Orthodox Church. To not mix the two terms (MOC and the lit'le autocephalous Skadar-littoral Archbishopric). And the Metropolinate was not abolished, but included into the re-unified Serbian Orthodox Church. The context in which you mention it is also slightly bizarre, considering that the canonical reunification was exactly what the last autocephalous Metropolitan was for. :) 
It is because of the same reason that I think that Abramovic and Dedeic simply do not belong to this article. For they are self-styled Vladikas, and not the real ones. --PaxEquilibrium 21:20, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sora (.hack)

message: "Sora does not appear as a playable character in the game, but instead an AI that's taken on his mannerisms and appearance, alongside similar copies of Tsukasa and Subaru, join your list of contacts as a reward at the end of Quarantine."
Are we sure of this?  I was under the impression that while the Tsukasa and Subaru characters were indeed AI copies, both Sora and Helba were the real players.  I'm fairly sure I read that somewhere, in a source I considered to be trustworthy, but at the moment, I can't remember where... does Quarantine (or another source) outright state that the Sora character is also an AI? Hossenfeffer 17:30, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  AI?
Talk:The Problems of Philosophy

message: This article claims that
"...Russell concentrates on knowledge rather than metaphysics."
I just read this book and found it to be all about epistemology, that is, the philosophy of knowledge. But epistemology, I believe, is generally regarded a branch of metaphysics. 
So to me, this seems to be logically equivalent to "In his book on relativity, Einstein concentrates on time and space, rather than physics."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.73.248.37 (talk) 05:03, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Epistemology isn't necessarily a part of metaphysics. -Pollinosisss (talk) 18:30, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

text: The two are often paired, but in my experience epistemology is never considered a part of metaphysics. The two have different subject matters, after all; epistemology studying how we acquire knowledge about the world, and metaphysics studying how the world is. Were you thinking about ontology being a branch of metaphysics?
T of Locri (talk) 02:13, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't epistemology part of metaphysics?
Talk:The Concept of Mind

message: Not really dubious, more of a clarification: 
In the article it is claimed:  "The reader must assume that Ryle himself is not misusing concepts when he employs metaphors of space, such as set, geography, relocation, replacing, preceding, following, and taking cross-bearings, in order to communicate his logic regarding concepts and categories. It is then to be taken for granted that the concept logic can lawfully be a member of the category (logical type) space."
Is this his claim out of the book, or is this commentary?
Briholt 23:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This sounds like a commentary. I'll remove it. Even if this criticism can be sourced, it should be put in a criticism section, not in the introduction. Tweisbach (talk) 05:32, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious

message: — Assignment last updated by Salma.btk1 (talk) 15:27, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Mind-Body
Talk:Tare weight

message: "tares" is the name of a weed (rye grass) mentioned in the gospel of Matthew.  See
http://www.christiananswers.net/dictionary/tares.html
Is it perhaps possible that "tare weight" came from the subtraction of the weed (tares) from the product (wheat), that is to say the "tare weight" is the weight of the total un-useable portion of the entire harvest?
:That etymology seems somewhat unlikely to me, since the dichotomy involved in the term's usage is of content versus packaging, not usable content vs waste content. 12.106.86.230 (talk) 21:17, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

message: The Tare and Tret article does not present sufficient information to stand on its own.  It should be merged with this article. Neelix (talk) 18:46, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Tare and Tret]] 

message: This article seems to primarily concern industrial and scientific uses, but most people will be familiar with the concept from the supermarket, where many items are sold by weight — especially with the advent of self-checkout where the customer must identify the container for the purposes of looking up the tare weight. 207.180.169.36 (talk) 20:08, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue focus?
Talk:Lemland

message: The alleged Finnish name is indeed not even unofficial but constructed by nationalist Fennomans. Therefore, I remove the information as redundant. Icarus1978 21:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See also Lemland's website and map from Maanmittauslaitos for confirmation that the name in Finnish is indeed Lemland. Do notice that Mariehamn in that image has two names: Mariehamn, and Maarianhamina, the latter being the name in Finnish, so this is not a map with only Swedish names.-- NordicStorm (t/c) 10:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You have no reasons to delete Lemlanti -name --83.102.5.106 13:56, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean, besides the reason mentioned above? -- NordicStorm (t/c) 15:42, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I cant see any reason why to remove finnish name, have you? I have see many articles about inner-Finland where has placed swedish name so why not finnish name in majority swedish article? Swedish and Finnish is both as worth as languages. --Jommala 21:22, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The reasons are detailed above. The Finnish name is "Kökar" "Lemland", and that's what in the article. For you to suggest that it has something to with "worth as languages" is, quite frankly, insulting.-- NordicStorm, modified on 21:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Let see example Rääkkylä...there is swedish name Bräkylä, but cannot find it neither offial municipality page nor Maanmittauslaitos. Still there is not even mention about swedish name isnt official. --Jommala 21:28, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Deal with it on Rääkkylä's talk page.-- NordicStorm (t/c) 21:41, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Besides, "Lemland" is referred to as "Lemland" in Swedish as well as in Finnish. And "Lemland" is in the article. Can't comment on the siutation with Rääkkylä.-- NordicStorm (t/c) 21:47, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Nowadays officially but there is still use about finnish name like in speak languages and unofficially purposes. --Jommala 07:24, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure what you're trying to say? But the Finnish name for "Lemland" is "Lemland". And that's in the article.-- NordicStorm (t/c) 10:06, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But also Lemlanti..-land Finnish form is -lanti. Same as Uppland -> Uplanti, Värmland -> Värmlanti ext... --Jommala 11:46, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Autopsia

message: Does anybody know any of the past or present members of this group? - cgilbert(talk|contribs) 07:32, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Personnel
Talk:2nd Parachute Division (Germany)

message: The content is heavily POV and is also unsourced from 2013. It's also heavily POV: please see: "Alternate geography; "stem the tide"; ahistorical terms; "much-needed recuperation"; etc. I plan to heavily redact it in the next couple of days, and then comment out the rest, if unsourced, per WP:V. Please let me know if there are any concerns. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:31, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there was no response, I will go ahead. BTW, the references section lists James S. Lucas – one of the popular historians "partially or wholly seduced by the [Waffen-SS] mystique" 
Please see  Revisionist tradition outside of HIAG for the source to citation above. I will remove this as well. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:23, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problematic content 

message: The title of this article should defenitly be changed from 2nd Parachute Division (Germany) to 2nd Parachute Division (Nazi Germany). The term Germany usualy describes the Federal Republic of Germany  wich is a completely different country than the third Reich. Also it could make people think that todays Germany has a 2. Fallschirmjäger Division wich is not the case.
The Incredible Blobfisch (talk) 21:30, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:General Electric TF34

message: I find the description confusing. Am I reading correctly that there are four turbine stages powering just the fan? And how many spools are there? Just two? Maury 21:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct about the low pressure section - there are 4 turbine stages (LPT) powering the fan alone. It applies to TF34, CF34-3 and CF34-8. The 14-stage (TF and -3) or 10 stage (-8) compressor spool is powered by 2-stage high pressure turbine (HPT). You should remember that a majority the turbofan engine thrust is the flow generated by the fan. This is why it needs so much torque from LPT. TRakowski 16:56, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, but FOUR turbines? What did they do, make them out of paper? Weird. Maury 00:11, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Stefan Wyszyński

message: To Stefan Wyszyński - 'cardinal' is not his middle name, it's his rank in the Church.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  00:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems pretty clear as per WP:NCWC. Olessi (talk) 23:58, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: Why did someone put 1944 in for the end of World War II?  I was wondering about the war ending in 1944 in some places, but recall that Russian troops headed west to besiege Berlin, where Hitler would commit suicide.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.20 (talk) 21:21, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  post-war resistance section 

message: Wyszyński had no connection with Kielce. I don't accept his opinions but are these opinions notable to create a subsection? His opinions about Communism are more important.Xx236 (talk) 12:59, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: prohibited religious indoctrination in public schools - it's Communist language. We don't use Nazi language, why do we use a Communist one?Xx236 (talk) 13:02, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wyszyński and Kielce pogrom
Talk:Death Ambient

message: This article says that the group first performed live in Germany in 1998.  However, Death Ambient performed two concerts in the UK in 1997, in London and Stirling.  James Plotkin replaced Fred Frith for these performances.  The London concert was broadcast on BBC Radio 3's "Mixing It" show.
There is a mention of the Stirling show here http://www.variant.randomstate.org/3texts/Robert_King.html.
I can't find written evidence of the London show (although I have a home recording of the broadcast, so I know I'm not imagining this).
DaveBerry 21:57, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the info. I've updated the article to reflect the UK concerts. --Bruce1ee 07:46, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Nederlands Wikipedia says here that their 1998 performance was in Halle, Belgium. I don't know which is right, but if somebody out there does, please correct it. Thank you. SchreiberBike (talk) 04:37, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is that the reference doesn't say in which Halle the performance took place. I'll see if I can find another source. —Bruce1eetalk 08:24, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Performance in Halle