lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dr. Tran

message: Please leave in that Leland is a "mudkip" in the characters/voice acting section. It is an inside joke with the online community that the creators of Dr. Tran come from, and is very probably that Leland was designed to look in part like the Pokemon "Mudkip". Verbringer89 07:50, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mudkip

message: An IP editor replaced the  tag after the statement "Over 70,000 pairs of 3-D glasses were produced solely for the short 3-D sequence in the film" with the following comment. — Saxifrage ✎ 20:54, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Were there any reviews, or does it give the number 70,000 and the "only for that sequence" part on the Spike and Mike website anywhere? Either of those might work as a citation. — Saxifrage ✎ 20:54, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 3D glasses

message: Shouldn't the quotes section, really, be moved to Wikiquote? It'd probably help clean up the article a little. 
BrokenLink 09:27, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, if any have become pretuclarly note worth, then a metion can be here but other than that the should be moved. Scaper8 05:29, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotes 

message: After an extensive search on the Internet, I find no evidence of the "Dickable Afternoons" episode being completed.  The Lone Sausage website does not feature or mention it anywhere except in their production logs.  Is there a source through which the Dickable Afternoons episode is available online, or was it only released for DVD?
It is on YouTube.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.58.250.11 (talk) 15:56, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episodes 

message: Would it be fine to link to the Dr. Tran episodes in the article?
If so,would it be in the external links, or in their respective part of the article?
99.13.70.165 (talk) 02:19, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Linking to Episodes

message: "The courageous little doctor has been compared in greatness to Chuck Norris."
LOL!! Okay.. that was pretty odd and CHUCK NORRIS???!!! What the?!! XDDD  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.94.206.12 (talk) 08:25, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Okay, is this for real?@

message: I kind of turned a blind eye to this for a while now in the hopes of finding coverage... but I can't find any. The main article for Lone Sausage is also a bit lacking in coverage but I think that we could have an article for one but not both. Because their other works have received some coverage, I've redirected to the main article for LSP. If anyone can find coverage, that'd be great. I do note that the article needs to be cleaned for promotional prose, though. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:35, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected
Talk:Shanghai clique

message: This article is out of date. It should be updated or removed. 58.50.142.15 (talk) 21:33, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: in Western literature "Shanghai Gang" seems to be more often used than "Shanghai Clique" (see, for example, McGregor, The Party). --13Peewit (talk) 09:32, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

message: Following on re-appointment of the new Politbureau Standing Committee (and its shortening from 9 members to 7 members), this article is now seriously in need of amendment, but certainly not of removal, as the Shanghai clique are more in evidence than ever before, and it is Hu's protagés who have failed to be appointed to the new Committee. Indeed, it would appear that Jiang has retained supreme power is spite of his 'retirement' a decade ago, and has survived to mastermind the return to power of the clique. Rif Winfield (talk)
:In the wider Politburo,at least two new members (Han and Meng) are core Shanghai Clique/Gang members who have gotten promotions since the Congress (Meng from Public Security Minister to Secretary of the CPC Politics and Law Commission,Han to Shanghai Party Secretary).They need to be added to the list of key members.--L.E./12.144.5.2 (talk) 18:23, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: November 2012 Congress
Talk:Tunnels & Trolls

message: I have a problem with this statement as written in the History section:
"Corgi Books in the United Kingdom produced mass-market paperback-sized versions of the core rulebook as well as many of the solo adventures (occasionally with adult content removed), a format which paved the way for the renowned Fighting Fantasy series of gamebooks."
I believe that the original solo books Buffalo Castle etc. inspired the Fighting Fantasy books and that the Corgi editions were an attempt by that publisher to break into the FF market in the UK by obtaining a licence from FBI to take advantage of the ready source of material. I believe the first FF book came out in 1982 and the Corgi Rulebook 1986.
Can anyone confirm if this is correct, close to the truth, or my brain is fading... Dekhurrrsio (talk) 14:28, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The only one of the T&T solo books I have on hand by Corgi has a print date of 1986. That is 4 years after the first FF book saw print. Omega2064 (talk) 05:27, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corgi Books 

message: WP:RS lists the kinds of sources whihc are considered reliable. These do not include blogs, forums and the like. Where content is critical of living individuals it is especially important to ensure that it is robustly sourced from reliable independent secondary sources. Guy (Help!) 12:50, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A reminder about reliable sources 

message: I'm not sure that an image of the lost 6th edition is the right image to post. Perhaps if all the covers where posted that would be alright but I think the 5th Edition or 7.5 edition cover would be better. Also I notice the image was cropped to exclude the Blade logo was there a reason for this? Mgtremaine (talk) 18:55, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems fishy to me too, very fishy. I think it should be reverted. 72.66.238.214 (talk) 21:17, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover Image for the page 

message: wow, this wiki page is well out of date. T&T has been bought and sold twice since most of this was written 92.20.64.246 (talk) 15:39, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getting things up to date
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/September 1, 2006

message: This paragraph could really use some help in the prose department. The flow is virtually non-existent and makes me wonder if it is indeed worthy of being on the front page. I say this not to criticize the authors, but I feel it should be majorly re-worked. if nothing else. If I have time, I'll get to it. -Mysekurity 20:55, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prose
Talk:Shanghighlander

message: Suggest that the title be Shanghailander rather than Shanghighlander.  This is consistent, for instance, with the source Wasserstein, Secret War in Shanghai, Houghton Mifflin Company, 1999.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.210.113.99 (talk) 15:40, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree; "Shanghailander" is the standard usage; see also Robert A. Bickers, "Empire Made Me: An Englishman Adrift in Shanghai" (Columbia, 2003)--BaiGuang (talk) 16:52, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Article title is incorrect. Shanghailander is redirected to History of Shanghai. Shanghailander is a redirection. So this article should ideally be merged with the History of Shanghai or a administrator looks at removing the redirect and to a move request to the proper name. Visik (talk) 02:24, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Subject is suitable for an article, but the title is wrongly spelt: it should be 'Shanghailander'. Furthermore, the article has been edited to include irrelevant material about central European refugees in Shanghai, who were not of 'British descent', i.e. not 'Shanghailanders'.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.98.154.125 (talk) 21:50, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shanghailander 

message: Correct spelling's article had been improperly blanked. I've restored it and moved appropriate material there already. Should be uncontroversial (see discussion above). Just need to have an admin merge the talk and histories. — LlywelynII 11:24, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to [[Shanghailander]]
Talk:Kenkai

message: The article has been here since 2006 with no context, no real substance, no sources, and no improvements. What is it we are waiting for exactly? Beeblbrox (talk) 21:44, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If those are problems, then appropriate tags that we should put are ones like , , etc. In principle, the poor quality of the article is not a sufficient ground for deletion. Having said this, I'm uncertain of the factuality of the article. I did a quick Google search, but I couldn't find anything on the person. Maybe he is simply too obscure (and that could be why there is not much edit on the article.) In any rate, that article has a problem doesn't translates to that it should be deleted. -- Taku (talk) 21:50, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *But if there is no information in the article regarding notability, and no one can find any reliable sources to establish notability, or indeed verifiability of the subject, as seems to be the case here, then what is the purpose of this article? Is it improving the project? I don't think so. It could always be re-created if sources were found. Beeblbrox (talk) 22:16, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I admit, I was under the impression there should be some reliable source when I removed the speedy tag. I agree with the deletion because the article can be recreated quite easily. (Though I still don't think this is a time-critical matter.) -- Taku (talk) 22:48, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  more time?
Talk:Shikumen

message: Claims that shikumen were adapted from Western architecture (and not simply a parallel development in similar situations) very much need to be referenced; further, the article doesn't mention any number of points about typical interiors or Chinese concerns such as feng shui or Southern exposures; further, the article appears conflicted whether the shikumen have an entry courtyard, a central atrium, or both. It also makes vague comments about "Anglo-American architecture" and "Lower Yangtze architecture and social behavior" that need to be clarified. — LlywelynII 14:20, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Numerous issues
Talk:Nephilim (role-playing game)

message: Mr. Collins has made no effort to make clear why he feels Nephilim is not notable.  Eric Burns refers to Nephilim with high praise: "This role playing game -- with lots of supplemental material by the staggeringly talented Kenneth Hite, I would add -- is one of those that RPG developers continue to cite as an influence today. Myself included." link  I propose removing the notability template until further reasoning why it is not notable is given. --Master Forcide 07:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Hello,
 who seem to be main contributors of this article, but also to anyone interested in:
In the article Character race#Race-driven campaign, I mentionned Nephilim because it seems to have changed the way races were handeled in tabletop RPGs. Especially, with Nephilim, the race is not only a flavour or a list of capabilities, but the real core of the plot.
However, I never player Nephilim, so I would like some "specialists" to have a look at this assertion.
Regards
cdang|write me 08:43, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please have a look to ''[[Character race]]'' 

message: Please update the external link 
* Chaosium's Nephilim products
to
* Chaosium's Nephilim products
Thank you, Sciencefish (talk) 11:44, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Per: WP:ELNO #5.  Spintendo  05:32, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  June 2023
Talk:Small Swords Society

message: How could this society have been established in "about 1840" and "1850," as the current version of this article states? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 01:14, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Especially when it was probably actually formed in 1853 according to most of Google Books' guys. — LlywelynII 09:58, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction

message: :The name ("Small Swords") refers to daggers used by warriors or martial artists in close combat. It is believed to be linked to triads.
This already had a [fact] tag on it but I'll just remove it since it's almost certainly wrong. 'Small Knife Society' is just a mistranslation based on the Chinese 101 vocab list that equates 刀 with the things that Chinese chefs have and that Westerners use with their forks. Really the 劎/刀 distinction is entirely alien to English and has nothing to do with relative size: some swords are jian and some are dao, based on the number of cutting edges they have. A) These guys had short swords or very very long knives (along with their guns and anything else they could get their hands on). They didn't default or train with 'daggers in close combat'. B) The actual base membership sign was their cap, red badge, and blue jacket and not any standardized weaponry. C) There was a later group with the same name who specifically took it from being lesser/younger than the Big Sword (dadao) Society and had nothing to do with machetes or knives at all. That was in the warlord era, though, so likely a separate group. Point being, this is universally the Small Sword/s Society; to the extent they had bladed weapons, they weren't daggers; they certainly weren't specially trained in them; and none of that should be left in the article without specific sourcing about how all of the above is wrong after all based on new/Chinese research. — LlywelynII 09:58, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: The name...
Talk:GURPS Fantasy

message: For completeness, Fantasy Adventures should be mentioned here (under publication history, presumably). Also GURPS Abydos. Newimpartial (talk) 20:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fantasy Adventures 

message: Also, the GURPS Tredroy setting should be mentioned here. I suspect it had reviews, as well. Newimpartial (talk) 23:01, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Newimpartial, I found at least two for Tredroy. :) BOZ (talk) 16:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  GURPS Tredroy
Talk:EverQuest Role-Playing Game

message: Has this game been officially cancelled? I don't recall anything new for it in a long while.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.11.132.73 (talk) 23:34, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: cancelled

message: This link does not work anymore. Anyone have an updated link?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Missjackie (talk • contribs) 19:06, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: White Wolf Link

message: I placed an updated link on the front page. -Missjackie  —Preceding undated comment was added at 19:14, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated
Talk:Atlantis (role-playing game)

message: I moved this article from Arcanum (role-playing game) to Atlantis (role-playing game), so here is my explanation why. Two of my best RPG history sources - Heroic Worlds by Lawrence Schick, and Designers & Dragons by Shannon Appelcline - both call this game "Atlantis". As the article does not yet have any sources (I will add both of mine eventually), there are no sources which claim "Arcanum" as the game's name, and since I have two soruces that claim it as "Atlantis", I figure that is the way to go. If you disagree, we can talk it out here. BOZ (talk) 00:48, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I'm an ass. The sources were there, but they were in the wrong below the external links so somehow I missed them. But examining them shows that RPGGeek calls it Atlantis, and so does RPGnet. So, I'm saying, case closed unless someone has some good evidence to the contrary. BOZ (talk) 02:51, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Due the title change, I have moved the focus away from the book called Arcanum -- which was simply the first book in the Atlantis Trilogy -- and more to the roleplaying game called Atlantis.Guinness323 (talk) 06:58, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atlantis
Talk:Qanawat

message: canatha is located in Jordan and its modern name is Um el Jmal. its considered to be near the Jordanian Syrian borders but its located north Jordan ....the information considring it part of syria is missleading
:Very wrong. Canatha is modern day Qanawat, and it is located in Syria, not Jordan.Orionist 04:51, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Quote:
"mentioned for the first time in the reign of Herod the Great (1st century BC), when Nabatean Arab forces defeated a Jewish army."
Is there a reference for this?  
Update  -  ok I found the reference, it is Jewish War 1:19:2.  This was at the time of the Battle of Actium - earlier than I expected.
(talk) 11:48, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Nabateans
Talk:Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay

message: Recent edits (and their summaries) require commentary:
a) While the removal of price is probably justified in this case, there is no policy against including prices and the community has not deemed them unencyclopedic. See WP:PRICES for details.
b) the original quote involving  read  (from January 2010). See how it was used at the beginning of a sentence? The proper way to fix the capitalization when the template is used mid-sentence is by the  parameter, not by removing it entirely. 
CapnZapp (talk) 19:54, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm wary of including prices. Without some specific commentary or comparison, it lacks context, and doesn't really inform the reader. Being that it was just the price without even a source (unlike the contents, which can be sourced to the box itself), I don't see the need to include it. oknazevad (talk) 20:06, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  You respond as if I was arguing to keep the price. Read my comment again. Thank you CapnZapp (talk) 07:35, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry if that came off argumentative. I was just trying to more fully expand on my edit summary. oknazevad (talk) 11:23, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prices 

message: I'd like to make a friendly reminder to both of you: discussions regarding article content are best held here, at the talk page, and not by edit comments Thank you CapnZapp (talk) 17:30, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  content 

message: There should be a linked page for the modules and accessories for WFRP. They should be grouped by edition and should include the publisher. Hotspur23 (talk) 17:55, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modules and accessories for Warhammer Fantasy Role-Play
Talk:Opponent process

message: Hi, given the relationship between this article and opponent-process theory, I'm giving a heads up that I've proposed a merge of A-process and opponent-process theory. Please join the discussion! --Xurizuri (talk) 07:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger between related articles 

message: Did some large chunk of this article get deleted during one of several merges or redirects? The current version seems to have very little actual information on opponent processes as applied to color perception and just has a few images off to the side that don't seem to connect to the content of the article. TV4Fun (talk) 19:10, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see history of any significant content going missing in quite a while, so if you see any info missing, its probably never been here. Sounds like your opportunity ;) Curran919 (talk) 07:18, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Information 

message: This article is already mostly American English. I will put in the template and make the corresponding changes where necessary (e.g. the few "colour" instances). Curran919 (talk) 14:31, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  American english 

message: Concerning image "Log-log plot of spatial contrast sensitivity functions for luminance and chromatic contrast". Im not sure its properly related to the content of this article. Sure, the information is organized according to opponent channels, buts its not exactly descriptive of the opponent process theory. Otherwise, can someone work it better into the body of the article? Curran919 (talk) 21:36, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image unrelated
Talk:HeadBlade

message: This looks like pure spam. If it wasn't for the uncollaborated claim of being listed by Time magazine, I'd PROD it as unnotable. As it is, just just reads like an advert. Requires cleaning up. -- Tivedshambo (talk) 20:59, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Much improved now. However, Barryfein has asked me about removing the  tag (I see he's done this), so I've requested peer review for an outside opinion. See User talk:Tivedshambo#Headblade -- Tivedshambo (talk) 16:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article cleanup 

message: In addition to the brief TIME coverage linked in the article already, I found the following: Google News found a few articles (San Antonio Express News, Orlando Sentinel), but Google Books found a lot more (, , , , , , ).--Michig (talk) 07:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deprodded, coverage found
Talk:Tékumel

message: The opening section could use some more info, IMO.  How about, where was this work done?  In what language?  When? How was it published? What was the purpose, games or stories?  Thanks.  I have never got into this kind of stuff, but it sounds like fun. Cheers. Steve Dufour 21:17, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Basic info please

message: I'm thinking of adding sections on races & deities to this article.  Feedback?  --mordicai. 17:14, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sections on races & deities

message: It is inspired by Urdu, Pushtu and Mayan, the latter influence can be seen in the inclusion of the sounds hl /ɬ/ and tl /tɬ/.
Mayan languages don't have /ɬ/ or /tɬ/. You're thinking of Nahuatl, which was spoken by Aztecs, rather than Mayans. There are some supposed Mayan inspirations, too, so maybe it should be extended to "Mesoamerican languages"? --93.105.203.24 (talk) 16:23, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Mayan "inspiration"
Talk:Gennaker

message: This article is not much more than a stub, and should probably be merged, along with the cruising chute article, into the spinnaker article, since all these sails are similar (lightweight nylon, not attached long the luff, deployed only for the appropriate downwind points of sail).  scot 21:01, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Rêve: the Dream Ouroboros

message: The 29 July 2009 at 15:44, Explodicle Proposed deletion for the following reason: no evidence of notability.
Of course there is no evidence of the notability, the number of sold books is not available. Anyway, the French version is one of the most famous RPG in France, and it is edited in English. The official Malcontent Games web site give two quotations from RPGnet. And it is on RPGnet http://index.rpg.net/display-entry.phtml?mainid=2752 , hope this is enough ;-)
cdang|write me 14:54, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That looks good enough for me. I just took down the notability tag. --Explodicle (T/C) 15:00, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion ?
Talk:Night Wizard!

message: a reminder that a ps2 game for this was released, someone should add an entry, even if its just a small one, about it.
source's here
http://5pb.jp/games/nightwizard/index.html
and for english users
http://www.ncsx.com/2008/022508/night_wizard.htm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.210.121.26 (talk) 18:36, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ps2 adaption

message: User Copycatloki, I realise you're probably on some sort of translation kick right now but the Jewels themselves are named after the seven virtues, as such regardless of what the most apparent translation is, the correct name for the jewels is in fact already on the page. GreatMizuti 03:22, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jewel Names

message: Isn't there more then enough information on the page for the anime for it to be split? --99.132.135.125 (talk) 04:51, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really, the section is unreferenced and appears unnotable. If the other problems with the article were sorted then it may be possible that a split is not needed any way. Op47 (talk) 09:59, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anime =