lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Operation Moduler

message: This article lists the G5 and G6. I'm not aware that the G6 was deployed during Moduler. Can anyone confirm/cite references? --Magicmike 02:01, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: G6

message: Many reliable sources state that this operation's official name was "Moduler" and they usually also comment on the odd spelling. I propose this page should be moved to Operation Moduler. Roger (talk) 17:43, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections so I'm going ahead with the move. Roger (talk) 09:27, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: (This conversation started at User talk:Dodger67#Operation Modulêr) Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:33, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: We use the spelling found in reliable English sources such as a variety of books by people such as Heitman, Steenkamp, etc. See WP:TITLE. Most of those sources specifically mention the unusual spelling, saying that it should have been "Modular" but because of the spelling error made by whoever officially registered the name, it is officially recorded as "Moduler". See the first footnote in - this professional academic history journal article - it is a mistake to name it "Modulêr" or "Modular". Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:38, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

text: The original name was not in Afrikaans to begin with - the whole series of ops during that period "Moduler, Hooper and Packer" all have English names - "Modulêr" is actually a translation of the original. Have you read the source I have linked in my above post? (BTW We should discuss this on the article talk page so that other people can also participate. I'm going to move this conversation there. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:21, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: , arguable the most comprehensive and authorotative book about the event, uses "Moduler". Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:03, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling again 

message: I have updated the article that I hope reflects a more detailed account of the original one, of the efforts of the soldiers of the Angolan and South African forces. It gives, as close as possible, a day by day account of one of the largest post WW2 military operations in Southern Africa. What is required is replications of the battle maps of the first and final phases of the operation and hopefully that is something I can master in the next couple of months. I was unable to add part of the original infobox to the general map. Thanks.Conlinp (talk) 05:29, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Major update of the article
Talk:Operation Hooper

message: Is something missing from the article? An editor has assigned it to the Aviation task force (Military History project, on the Talk page), but nothing in the article refers explicitly to air force involvement. Perhaps a person familiar with the actions that are mentioned will know that they are either air attacks or at least have significant air components, but that doesn't help those of us who don't know anything about the events. PKKloeppel (talk) 15:04, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Air forces?
Talk:Battle of Grand Gulf

message: Grand Gulf is one of the locations listed as part of Vicksburg National Military Park. Do they have a visitor centre, guided tours, interactive maps and hotel/restaurant facilities? Valetude (talk) 11:57, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visitor centre?
Talk:Battle of Snyder's Bluff

message: Snyder's Bluff is one of the locations listed as part of Vicksburg National Military Park. Do they have a visitor centre, guided tours, interactive maps and hotel/restaurant facilities? Valetude (talk) 13:10, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a visitor's center in Vicksburg at the main unit of the military park. It appears there are guided tours (and self guided tours) available as listed on the park's official website and there are plenty of hotels and restaurants available in Vicksburg, along with a number of antebellum mansions available for lodging – it's been some time, but last time I visited there I stayed at Cedar Grove. There is another called "Anchuca", plus several others I can't recall. The gem of the park, not to be missed is the USS Cairo, which was salvaged from the Yazoo River in the Snyder's Bluff/Haynes Bluff area and is on exhibit in the park, along with it's own visitor's center/museum. I don't think there is much interpretation at all in the Haynes/Snyder's Bluff s area, so you might want to specify a tour guide that's well informed on that aspect of the park if that's a prime interest of yours. Mojoworker (talk) 16:37, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visitor centre? 

message: The copy currently ends in mid-sentence! Valetude (talk) 21:45, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing words
Talk:Battle of Honey Springs

message: Added further detail to emphasize the presence of native american & black units on the Federal side and an amplified article with bibliography for the interested student. The reference link is to a much longer article, a reproduction of an eyewitness engraving and a bibliography to the article (and a game referenced elsewhere on the site.
The guidelines suggest somebody else should review the linked article to verify that it is appropriate.  So I'd appreciate it if somebody would do that.  Thx. --LPDuff 22:44, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to Battle of Honey Springs.

message: This article now meets the requirements for Class C. I have made this change for WP:Oklahoma. Bruin2 (talk) 05:06, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Article reclassification
Talk:Siege of Cahir Castle

message: :(1)An editor added a flag emblem to the "box" and it was reverted by JD. I have since restored it a few times and always JD reverts. Could we please have an explanation why "no flag" is appropriate for the Irish side of this war? 
:(2) I made an edit myself to remove (I assume good faith) pov language which suggested the British casualty figures were more credible than the Irish ones; again JD has been reverting this along with the flag reverts. An explanation here might also be more productive than edit warring. Sarah777 (talk) 15:48, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No idea why the red hand of ulster is in the battle box. Don't want to get into an argument, just saying ... and reverting. If you have a source showing the defenders fought under this flag I'd be happy to see it.Shtove (talk) 22:07, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Flags, again
Talk:Battle of New Hope Church

message: While the existing article has some nice pictures, the two paragraphs under Battle are uncited. I will probably replace them with cited material. Djmaschek (talk) 23:22, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncited
Talk:Battle of Marietta

message: I have not spent any significant time on the Atlanta Campaign articles, but I came across this one while working on the biography of Leonidas Polk. The scope of this article seems odd because it directly overlaps with two battles that are described separately. The National Park Service webpage on this refers to it as Marietta Operations, not Battle of Marietta. In the book,
* Kennedy, Frances H., ed., The Civil War Battlefield Guide, 2nd ed., Houghton Mifflin Co., 1998, .
which uses the same organization as the CWSAC, but usually with more detail, refers to this action (GA013) as "Lost Mountain -- Brushy Mountain Line, Georgia" and gives dates of June 9-18. Suggestions? Hal Jespersen (talk) 20:11, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  article scope?
Talk:Second Battle of Dalton

message: This article was previously titled "Second Battle of Dalton."  In fact, however, according to Eicher & Eicher, Civil War High Command 908, it was the third battle of Dalton.  The disambiguation page "Battle of Dalton" failed to account for the true second battle of Dalton, May 12, 1864, early in Sherman's Atlanta Campaign.  This battle of Dalton is sufficiently important that it is commemorated before Resaca on the Sherman monument in Washington DC.  It would be nice if someone with the capability to do it could start a second battle of Dalton page for the May 12, 1864 engagement -- that title is now taken and simply redirects to third battle of Dalton  Hartfelt (talk) 17:53, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you should be careful to get consensus before renaming articles. Although Eicher has a list of actions, they don't necessarily represent notable events. The NPS CWSAC classification is what we usually use for creating Wikipedia battle articles. Phisterer, in the Statistical Record of the Armies of the United States, does not list it as a troop engagement. In the ORs (SERIES I--VOLUME XXXVIII/1 [S# 72], p. 52), it is listed as "May 9-13, Demonstration against Dalton, with combats near Varnell's Station (9th and 12th) and at Dalton (13th)" and I haven't found further descriptions of anything significant. Unless you can come up with a real description of a battle for Dalton II, you should reverse the name change. Hal Jespersen (talk) 19:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

text: One other comment. I just noticed that Kennedy lists a battle GA024, which is not on the CWSAC website, called Dalton III, part of Hood' TN campaign. Hal Jespersen (talk) 20:00, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming "Third Battle"
Talk:Operation Iron Saber

message: :I attempted to add a link to the article on "Operation Iron Saber" however it was immediately removed. The link to the killertroopvets.org website contains articles from the Washington Post, New York Times, and other newspapers that describe how "Iron Saber" was executed. The link to the website should be put back as an external reference.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by CPTKG1 (talk • contribs).
::The thing is that there are no links to the articles themselves, only article texts. Veinor (talk to me) 23:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Killertroopvets.org
Talk:Battle of St. Charles

message: The Mound City was indeed repaired and active for the remainder of the war. Red Harvest (talk) 20:28, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved.  —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 08:28, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Battle of Saint Charles →  – In all of the sources I looked into getting this to GA and bringing this to ACR, the spelling "Saint Charles" is basically never used.  Sources consistently refer to it by the spelling "St. Charles".  Presumably if the hyphen in Battle of Saint-Charles is enough dabbing now, it'll still be fine with a move of this to St. Charles. Hog Farm  Talk 19:05, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 November 2021
Talk:Battle of Monett's Ferry

message: Why does the last sentence of this page appear in italics, when these are not indicated on the edit-page? Valetude (talk) 14:44, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit-foible
Talk:Battle of Pleasant Hill

message: Not at all sure that I like the gallery of commanders. Very bulky and doesn't actually contribute much information, IMO. Would have preferred a brief paragraph detailing the units on both sides.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:35, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why are the references to the 47th PA necessary? There were regiments from Maine and New York at the battle, so it's not like a regiment from the Northeast was unique. Why a full paragraph to talk about their experiences? Isn't that what regimental pages are for? 2601:42:901:BC60:9116:7B46:EDE4:D541 (talk) 02:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  47th PA References
Talk:Second Battle of Adobe Walls

message: this article contains the EXACT same content as the site, http://www.tsl.state.tx.us/exhibits/indian/showdown/page2.html, down to punctuation. Please have this changed, or cite it.
70.234.248.51 03:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  plagarism 

message: According to another source that was referenced in the Isatai'i article (https://texasbeyondhistory.net/redriver/index.html) it was about 300 Indian attackers, not 700. How do we know which number is correct? Billy7 (talk) 18:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  700 or 300 attackers? 

message: the sharps creek referenced in this article  is not 75 miles southwest of Dodge city. sharps creek is about 150 miles northeast of Dodge 2600:8803:748E:8800:D52E:D30C:A93B:7134 (talk) 14:47, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  sharps creek 

message: There is a Sharp creek in the pan handle of Oklahoma south west of Dodge. 2600:8803:748E:8800:D52E:D30C:A93B:7134 (talk) 14:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  sharp creek
Talk:Battle of Slim Buttes

message: The article contradicts the article on American Horse (elder) it links to in that it states he was killed in this battle. The article on A.H. states that this is a common misinterpretation on events. I don't know which is right but both can't be. (188.97.123.237 (talk) 16:43, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have expanded the stub and corrected the original contributor's error in date. Scott Mingus 19:15, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect information 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  03:59, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Battle of Coulmiers

message: # There was no surprise for the bavarian corps. They knew about the armee d´loire, and took their position several hours befor the battle began.
# Disorder in the retread. Von der Tann managed a retread so fast, that the french where unable to follow him. He left 2.500 men in Orléans when he went for the battle. Only 800 to 1.000 men (wounded or just ill) where still in Oléans when d`Aurelles arrived there. 
# The french hold position around Orléans for several days, the Battle of Beaune-la-Rolande was 19 days later. So they had time to rest and for exercises. Von der Tann met Friedrich Franz II, Grand Duke of Mecklenburg-Schwerin just three days after Coulmiers in Angerville. 
Sorry for my bad english, I didn´t wrote one sentence in english since several years. --Batke 16:50, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistakes in this article
Talk:Battle of Arica

message: To User  Korosuke, please do not include your personal opinions as part of the article. We are trying to present a NPOV version of the events. Mel Romero 11:54, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looting 

message: This article requires addition of source citations to be B-class. It would also benefit from further expansion. Askari Mark (Talk) 19:11, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reclassed as "Start" 
Talk:Pavel Dybenko

message: This article seems finished.
No materials from Victor Suvorov or Bunich were used here.
AbuAmir 10:33, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old talk 

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met.   With appropriate citations and references, this article would easily qualify as B class if not higher.   --dashiellx (talk) 19:06, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Even if Dybenko was born in what was later declared "Ukrainian SSR", and even if he spoke native Ukrainian, (besides native Russian , there is no such thing as Ukrainian Revolutionary in 1916...1917, unless you mean Ukrainian nationalist, Ukrainian separatist. Dybenko was neither. The commie revolt was absolutely NOT nationally oriented. On the contrary, it was ANTI national. Many would say, it was communists against human kind. More kindly speaking, Bolsheviks openly intended to ruin Russian empire and use it as a base for the WORLDWIDE revolt. A man who used machine guns against unarmed demonstrants in Petrograd sure wasn't acting as an Ukrainian revolutionary. It is no good to reinvent history just as a tribute to the Ukrainian nationalism revival.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by AbuAmir (talk • contribs) 05:58, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian or Ukrainian? 
Talk:Sergey Gorshkov

message: A soviet aircraft carrier was later named after him. Karmic chameleon 05:10, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: Translation of the Russian for "better is the enemy of good enough" is correct.Moryak (talk) 16:45, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Quote confirmation
Talk:Carlow University

message: There is a lot of unsourced information here, names upon names of buildings. This is not relevant for an encyclopedia, could potentially be misleading because there are no references, and it just looks a lot like a lot of advertising. If nothing changes, I would recommend deleting some parts. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 20:01, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no one chimed in, I will go ahead and remove some of the self-promotion. --Melchior2006 (talk) 07:30, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buildings
Talk:Vasily Chichagov

message: This is the spelling used in historical accounts, at least those published in British Columbia, concerning the history of Russian America.  Given the date - it and the Orel were deployed at Fort Stikine in 1831, it doesn't seem to have been the same vessel as the Chichagov out of Archangelsk in 1766 mentioned in this article.  AFAIK the island was named for the ship, maybe I'm wrong - rather than for Vasili Chichagov.  I don't have any detailed information on the Chichagoff, which maybe the article should be standard-anglicized to Russian ship Chichagov, but now it seems like there's going to be at least two such articles, if ever...Skookum1 (talk) 15:51, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Russian ship Chichagoff]] & re the island
Talk:Cornelius Cruys

message: There is a lot of inconsistency with the spelling of the name in this article. Is he Cornelius Cruys or Cornelis Cruys? I think it should be decided which is correct and then use that spelling throughout the article.
:At the time he lived, there wasn't an institution to decide which spelling was "correct". I think that people insisting on "correct" spelling should learn to speak another language, like most of the world did at/before kindergarten. --129.125.102.126 (talk) 21:36, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Johan Hampus Furuhjelm

message: Introduction needs a little expansion. When did he live? (If you don't know specific dates, give some other indication of time period, such as "early 19th c" or "during the reign of..") Which conflicts was he involved in? LordAmeth 09:47, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MILHIST Assessment

message: If Otto Wilhelm Furuhjelm is Johan's father (how many people can there be with that name), how come the birth and death years for Otto don't agree (1794 to 1871 here, 1819 to 1883 there)? Clarityfiend (talk) 07:13, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: He is not Johan's father. Surely. I don't have that book by hand. I will check and let you know. They are relatives for certain, but their relation is not father-son.ISasha (talk) 10:15, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Father?

message: This caught my interest:
:According to a contract which had been signed, Russian America had to deliver a certain amount of ice to San Francisco at a fixed price.
Anyone here have any idea if this was with an American company or with the Hudson's Bay Company, which maintained a post at San Francisco, though perhaps not this late (their post was at Yerba Buena (town) and had been founded in 1830.  The reason I propose the HBC is that there was a treaty - more than one - between the RAC and the HBC on the latter's provisions of dairy and meat and vegetables to Russian America; maybe there was a reciprocal agreement.  I can't imagine what treaty the RAC/Russia would have had with the United States that could have signed between 1824 and 1859....unless this has something to do with US support during the Crimean War?  Or??  If it's a contract with a private company (other than the HBC), then "treaty" is not the right word to use.  if it's a corollary to the Anglo-Russian Convention of 1839 or the earlier arrangements with either the Pugets Sound Agricultural Company  or some grandfathered contract re the agreement with Mexico over Fort Ross, somebody please explain....Skookum1 (talk) 03:36, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ice treaty?
Talk:Adam Johann von Krusenstern

message: I corrected some of the information in the article.
A word to all Russians: If you like it or not, Krusenstern was not of Russian nationality. He was a Baltic German of Estland, an autonomous province (some sort of crownland) of the Russian Empire, subject only to the tsar and with German as its official language until late 19th century.
That's why you may call him an admiral of the Russian Navy, but not a Russian admiral or Russian explorer.
A word to all ethnic Estonians: Modern day Estonia is not identical with Estland. Estonia was formed in 1918/19 and incorporated former Estland and parts of former Livland. The names of all larger locations in Estland had been traditionally and officially German for many centuries, no matter if Estland was independent or under Swedish or Russian rule. It was not before the late 19th century, when all names where switched to Russian. Then, after 1918/19 all names where switched to ethnic Estonian. The names used in the article are all ethnic Estonian names, and therefore only used for the last 90 years! Thus, if these names are used in the article, they give an incorrect image of country and people during Krusenstern's lifetime. Therefore, I switched all the names to the original and official names of pre-1918/19
Maybe Estland was also called Estonia in English during earlier centuries. I am not sure about this.
If yes, s.o. could change it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.48.117.115 (talk • contribs) 12 April 2010‎
: He was not Baltic German explorer. He was Russian explorer of Baltic German nationality. There no Baltic Germans explorers, because of no Baltic German Fleet. Another way you must correct articles about German Empress Catherine the Great and Russian engineer Sikorsky.Ходок (talk) 08:47, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Krusensterns nationality and names of locations in Estland
Talk:Mikhail Lazarev

message: There seems to be a dispute around the ethnic origin of Lazarev.
It would be better is some sort of references will be provided. Quick googling confirms that he was from the Vladimir gubernia, but I cannot find the story about his Jewish convert mother, nor about his Armenian origin abakharev 01:07, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This Lazarev is unrelated to the Armenian Lazarevs.--Eupator 20:45, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family 

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 12:01, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008