Talk:Chinookan peoples

message: Clothing was different for Chinookan groups. People near the mouth wore little to no clothing. Chinookan people in the Columbia River gorge wore something different.
They wore them to wedding,ceremonies.deaths.and births.Men wore long baggy pants.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.175.181.88 (talk) 22:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They weren't dresses, they were tunics, which was common wear in most socieities for thousands of years; the fabric was the cambium of the red cedar, the garment was called a kalakwhattie, Kalahkwahtie etc (var. spelligns).  A dress, for one thing, is tailored; a tunic doesn 't have to be....Skookum1 (talk) 03:55, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: chinook cultural clothes

message: This page needs major edits. It conflates Chinookan Peoples, with the Chinook Indian Nation.
Chinookan Peoples include MANY GROUPS of Chinookan-language-speaking people indigenous to the Columbia River’s Lower and Middle sections. ColumbiaWP
This should be Chinookan Peoples and not confused the Chinook (tribe) or the "Chinookan" l, which should go to a language page (Chinookan language?).Skookum1 (talk) 03:09, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change?

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Chipewyan people which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 09:45, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chinookan peoples. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927000622/http://www.indianz.com/TribalLaw/Focus/showreview.asp?ID=1222001 to http://www.indianz.com/TribalLaw/Focus/showreview.asp?ID=1222001
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130119021749/http://www.chinookobserver.com/free/president-obama-hillary-clinton-pay-tribute-to-slain-chinook-member/article_5264d608-fe9c-11e1-a9de-0019bb2963f4.html to http://www.chinookobserver.com/free/president-obama-hillary-clinton-pay-tribute-to-slain-chinook-member/article_5264d608-fe9c-11e1-a9de-0019bb2963f4.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:22, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Why is the article name different from the name given in the first sentence to describe this group?
Also the article says "However, it is not appropriate to use the term "Chinookan." This term is a misnomer invented by white people to describe a wide variety of peoples who have inhabited the Lower Columbia but aren't connected as a single group of people."  If that is the case, should we rename the article entirely?
Overall I found this to be confusing.
-KaJunl (talk) 13:03, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinookan peoples vs. Peoples of the lower Columbia 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:37, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion