Talk:Musicians' Union (United Kingdom)

message: This is a terrible article. Whoever contributed to this ought to be ashamed of themselves. All I have learned about the Musicians Union is that they forbid American Jazz musicians at some point. I know nothing else. This is quite possibly the worst article on any topic available in the world.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.251.229.240 (talk) 01:51, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worst article on the Internet 

message: Appallingly bad, this appears to have been written by the MU and is nothing but a puff piece. Needs a rewrite from scratch. Looking at revision history, it appears to at one time have actually discussed the MU and its history, but now it's just advertising. An unencyclopaedic disaster, this is.82.71.30.178 (talk) 01:43, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly The Worst Article On Wikipedia 

message: How could a free, creative musician feel at ease in such a company ? How many voices of complaint must be filed in this talk section before the page gets a well deserved banner "NPOV questioned" at its front?
http://www.strawpoll.me/11005069
131.111.184.102 (talk) 15:15, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The MU had a hugely negative influence on British culture in the 60s and 70s, mostly because of its extremely cosy relationship with the BBC. MU needle time agreements were largely responsible for the rise of offshore pirate radio in the mid 60s. --Ef80 (talk) 15:56, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly internet's clearest example of trade unions' totalitarism and intolerance 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Thincat (talk) 16:59, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Musicians' Union (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120311211534/http://www.unionstogether.org.uk/pages/member_unions to http://www.unionstogether.org.uk/pages/member_unions
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified