lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Death worship

message: Are you interested in creating an account?  It would make this discussion much easier.  The edit history is difficult to follow with all those IP's. —Viriditas | Talk 14:11, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry i cannot accept cookies on this machine therefore i cannot register. As for AnonMoos allegations, there has been no "180-degree hairpin turn" and nothing was "dragged in". The real issue and context of worshippers of death requires coverage of the intersection of the monotheism of islam and polytheism of hinduism - especially as represented in the membership of the thugee cult. As I have mentioned again and again it is your limited knowledge on this subject coupled with your political POV that is the problem, not my edits. 62.25.106.209 09:57, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are of course, referring to AnonMoos, not me, but let me first recommend as an informal mediator, that you both stop attacking each other.  Let's start on a point by point basis, and tackle each topic.  Perhaps the both of you can agree to meet halfway?  First off, I can tell you right now, that I have the right to remove any and all unreferenced material.  I suggest you start adding references, because I will begin removing content if this conflict does not resolve itself. —Viriditas | Talk 10:02, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes of course I was referring to AnonMoos - and yes i'm willing to be civil, assume good faith etc as long as AnonMoos reciprocates. I agree with you as far as references go and I would support you in removing unreferenced material. 62.25.106.209 12:35, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you be interested in creating a temporary version of the article as a sub-page? Talk:Death worship/temp would be a good start.  —Viriditas | Talk 12:42, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, I will try and get something together and then add it in the next couple of days. If anyone else wants to make a start then that would be fine by me. 62.25.106.209 15:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question for 62.25.106.209
Portal talk:Latvia/box-header

message: Made it more of a linen color. There was simply too much Latvian red. :-)
Peters 01:17, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought it was too dark and changed it. I agree that exact "Latvian Red" shouldn't be used, but the design of portal should represent Latvia, therefore I used sligt shade of red and silver-grey (white blurs into background to much) to represent national colors ---- Xil/talk 16:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Paul Pressler

message: This article contains only one reference to the fact that Pressler is chief executive officer of the Gap; the rest is a laborious rehash of his tenure with Disney, which seems extremely lopsided.
:I have nothing to do with this article, but is your objection that there is no information about Pressler being CEO of Gap, Inc., or that the Disney information is somehow biased? If it is the former as your comment might lead one to believe, perhaps using Template:expand on the article might be better. If you think the Disney information is biased, list what your objections are so that they can be addressed by someone familiar with the subject. — Bellhalla 04:18, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. --Speedway 16:27, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20090716/FREE/907169991
Crain's Business reports Mr Pressler has accepted a job with Clayton Dubilier & Rice, a Private Equity firm in New York.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.37.68.117 (talk) 23:31, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Employer 
Talk:Phil Vassar

message: Perhaps we should add a little bit about his ads with Prilosec OTC?
Tony 01:23, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I uploaded two images of him in concert at a local fair. The images are screenshots of video that I took, so they are not very high quality. If you can find better free images, replace these if necessary. --Nehrams2020 20:35, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I realize that this is several years later, but I have just replaced the infobox image with this one which is clearer and sharper. I took it in 2008. --Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 05:30, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:Trepanation (album)

message: what band is this album by? -Drdisque 01:48, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Montjuïc circuit

message: New entry quickly translated from Spanish version with Babelfish. Needs editing. --Matthead 01:49, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Austregésilo de Athayde

message: I'm tempted to take the SGI thing out, but so many of the sites about him mentioned it that maybe it matters.--T. Anthony 01:51, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Delta Force

message: "In this film, can see, the individual equipment of one member of that unit:" - to which is say, "huh?"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.206.222.20 (talk) 17:51, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to the infobox, there were 153 people onboard the aircraft, with 157 surviving the ordeal. Does anyone else see a problem here? Bjelleklang  -  talk 09:41, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: Apart form the bogus name, the "Lebanese terrorist group" in the film appears to be based on the Amal Movement, they use the Amal flag, and one of their leaders is even listed as "George Berri" in the cast/character list (Jamil in the movie), a thinly veiled reference to Nabih Berri. FunkMonk (talk) 20:47, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amal Movement
Talk:Kingpin (1996 film)

message: The article calls this a "slapstick comedy"... I really don't think that's a good description. They may be a couple semi-slapstick scenes, just barely but I wouldn't describe the movie as slapstick at all. Am I wrong here, or what? It just seems incorrect to call it that to me. Miker00lz (talk) 04:54, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slapstick??
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Florida/opentask

message: Since we are using this page for Florida-specific content rather than general open tasks like Template:Opentask, shall we remove the final line which links to non-Florida tasks? --Tetraminoe 01:56, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem for me.  Are you sure you want images of Fantasy Fest... ℬastique▼parℓer♥voir♑ 03:05, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh... no, the pictures aren't for me, they're to improve the encyclopedia... --Tetraminoe 08:20, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

message: How about we get some of the existing requests finished before we continue adding new ones!  Just a thought.  ℬastique▼parℓer♥voir♑ 19:55, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ha, or so you'd think... --Tetraminoe 06:59, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New requests
Talk:IRS Volunteer Income Tax Assistance Program

message: The volunteers are no longer restricted to being accounting students. Though accounting students are encouraged to participate, just about anyone can volunteer.Davisjrg5 (talk) 04:59, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Volunteer Population

message: This is undoubtedly machine translated.
-fixed (somewhat...), and added stub tag. N. Paul Inast 15:45, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was Merge Forms Only. — Morphh  (talk) 02:20, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I suggest we merge all these U.S. Forms (and any others) and "IRS Volunteer Income Tax Assistance Program" into a new article titled United States tax forms or Tax forms in the United States.  If it is too big, we could merge all the 1040 Forms into one and add a summary style to the main article.  Offer preference of article title if you have one.  Morphh (talk) 16:50, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok... what about the other forms...? Morphh  (talk) 21:11, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I posted to Moorlock's talk - It appears his concern was the VITA article, which the others also opposed. Morphh  (talk) 02:20, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:California's 50th congressional district

message: This is about the 50th district, yes? It doesn't read like it.
:You are susposed to sign with 4 tiles (~~~~), yea. It doesn't read like it--IAMTHEEGGMAN (talk) 01:29, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Regarding the line: "Representative Cunningham resigned on November 28, 2005 in a bribery/prostitution scandal.", as far as I know, there were no charges of prostitution made here.  There are some reports that prostitution may be involved as part of the bribes given him but it has not been confirmed by a on the record law enforcement source, as far as I know.  Also, when he resigned, the scandal was about bribery, the prostitution accusations came after his resignation.  Now I could be wrong about this, but absent some references, I'm going to remove the prostitution part.  Frankly, he's been pretty much totally disgraced and there isn't really a need to throw that in.  Fanra 14:44, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prostitution?

message: Can this be mentioned at last sentence of first section, who's running to fill the position in 2020? --From Peter a.k.a. Vid2vid (here's his talk page), 🖋 on 01:59, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carl deMaio and Darryl Issa running, 2020..
Talk:Odradek

message: I support wikisourcing this article. However, may I be inclined to know what is the copyright status of this article? This may clear up a few items in this mysterious fog.
Wikipedia Stubmechanic 01:58, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikisource is necessary

message: Isn't Kafka's work Public Domain? Rather, send it to Wikisource. Avi 02:05, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: However is this translation public domain?  Please verify the source of this translation in order to be sure it is not under copyright before moving to wikisource.--Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 00:33, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the Willa and Edwin Muir translation of the story; I don't really know why this appears under the name of the creature rather than the name of the story, which has its own article. Anyway, this translation is NOT public domain and should therefore be deleted. I suggest redirecting Odradek to The Cares of a Family Man. AshcroftIleum 08:34, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - the fact that the translation isn't public domain should mean the article is deleted and the link redirected. Autarch 19:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that there's more material on this page, I suggest merging it with the story's page, which details the publishing history AshcroftIleum (talk) 20:08, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion Necessary? Wikisource instead?
Talk:Bias of Priene

message: When he stated that most humans are bad, he was not speaking from a neutral point of view. Some experiences must have influenced his judgment.Lestrade 02:10, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not debating veracity. Just wondering if the article can contain information on the reason for his judgment.Lestrade (talk) 15:06, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias's Bias

message: I have not found any discussion or consensus as requested by WP:ERA on this talk page giving a substantial reason why the BC/AD format had to be changed to BCE/CE. As a result, this violation will be reverted back to BC/AD unless there are any objections why BCE/CE should remain. Dalek (talk) 12:29, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Strong objection. Dalek has posted this notice of intended "reversion" of an era "violation" without checking the article history. The first use of any era system in the article is here. Clearly, it was BCE. Haploidavey (talk) 18:28, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest we convert "BCE" to "BC" solely on the grounds of consistency. All the articles about the Seven Sages of Greece use the "BC" designation. –Omnipaedista (talk) 10:27, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion of date format
Talk:List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (McLachlin Court)

message: I'm liking what the US folks have done with their case lists by making them into tables. Would anyone object to a similar table format here? --PullUpYourSocks 21:28, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Table

message: I'm not sure if this list was manually compiled or if there is a bot/script which pulls them in, but it would be great if the list was updated with last year's decisions.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.139.16.23 (talk) 20:45, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2010 cases?
Talk:Pilsner glass

message: Photo Added 4-23
Georgestr 21:13, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Collins glass

message: Narrower than what?  The article needs to be edited to either clear up grammatical errors like that one, or to clarify what the comparative adjectives refer to.  I cannot, because I don't know what the glass even looks like, but if someone who does could edit for me, that would be much appreciated.--Dark Green (talk) 23:48, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slightly "Narrower"? 

message: The glass in the photo is not a Collins glass. A Collins glass is more cylindrical. Rees11 (talk) 03:35, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong glass 

message: Article says that glass is "holding 240 to 350 ml (12-16 fluid ounces)". Either I am calculating wrong or this is impossible since 1 fluid ounce seems to be approximately 30 millilitres. This would mean that collins glass holds 8 to 12 fluid ounces or 360 to 480 ml.
--80.221.48.109 (talk) 23:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size of the glass is conflicting
Talk:Highball glass

message: the "Peter Macewen" is listed as an example of a drink often served in a highball glass. I can't find any evidence that this drink actually exists and suspect that it's a vanity stunt. If no one can produce evidence of this drink, I suggest that it be removed from the examples. --Amoore 18:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 10 days and no response. I removed Peter Macewen as an example drink. -- Amoore 15:54, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Macewen 

message: left|thumb|100px
I've moved this off the main page, a two line stub hardly needs two semi-identical pictures.
As this picture is of less quality (sorry, glass is cracked, poorly lit, and lower quality image and format compared to the .svg one) it makes sense to use the other one.--ZayZayEM 06:46, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temporary image move
Talk:Washington Park (Portland, Oregon)

message: There seems to be conflicting information on the dedication of this monument.  
*  says it was 1903-5-21.
*  appears to be the state legislature funding similar work
*  says president Teddy laid the cornerstone in 1903 and it was completed in 1908.
*  is in depth but doesn't really say
Maybe one was a dedication and the other a commissioning?  The park's dept seems to have the best explanation.  Anyone know anything about this?   EncMstr 00:07, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lewis and Clark monument history

message: I would suggest that much of this information be moved to the Wikitravel article on Portland .  Using other articles in :Category:Urban public parks as guidelines (such as Morningside Park, Pelham Bay Park, Loring Park, Hyde Park, Sydney, etc.), the size and much of the content isn't really appropriate.
:Agreed—I didn't know of such a "destination".  :-)   EncMstr 23:04, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there are no urban parks that have been featured, I will use Central Park as the gold standard when rewriting this article. Cacophony 06:34, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: When I started working on it, the article was rather minimal.  I drew inspiration from the Central Park article and added to it accordingly.  But it was one look and dashing forward without another look.  I'd be interested in your interpretation.  EncMstr 23:04, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikitravel 

message: I'm assuming the John Reed with the memorial plaque is this John Reed . There's also some misspellings in the quote... 99% chance they are typos but there's a small chance they are on the plaque like that. Somebody should check. Jason Quinn (talk) 01:10, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Reed 

message: The Washington Park Reservoirs Historic District is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Should we have a standalone article? ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Washington Park Reservoirs Historic District
Talk:Dry Creek railway station

message: Some unsourced points (but sourcing is possible with effort):
* The depot handles all maintenance since 2011 regardless of whether it was diesel or electric (to come later)
* When the Seaford line went electric the sets (one or two) would be ferried to and from Dry Creek by a diesel set with I think three trips possible each day.
* At the same time part of the depot was electrified in short sections
* The depot and tracks to and from it is now all electric except for some short sections, e.g. to allow safe working on top of vehicles.
Track diagrams like http://www.sa-trackandsignal.net/Pdf%20files/Adelaide/AD2033.pdf show the current state. With luck the Internet Archive should have previous copies. Alex Sims (talk) 10:45, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electrification at Dry Creek Depot
Talk:Battle of the Komandorski Islands

message: #Due to the remote location of the battle and chance encounter on open ocean, neither fleet had air or submarine assistance, making this the only engagement exclusively between surface ships in the Pacific Theatre, and the last pure gunnery duel in naval history. - ehm... And what about battle of Savo island? (and many other battles during Salamon campaign...)
#This article represents imho US-point of view. It's only about actions of US Navy ships and the enemy is mentioned only as Japan/japanese. Actions of Salt Lake City and another US vessels are described, but there is nothing about Nachi, Maya, Tama, Abukuma (and 4 destroyers)
--Sceadugenga 08:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your objections are valid so, please feel free to fix the article.  A complete list of credible references and sources are listed.  Some of them are even on the web, so you don't have to go to the library or bookstore to get them.  The Combinedfleet.com links give the Japanese POV, but without great detail. Cla68 08:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I just read over the Battle of Savo Island page, and it actually mentions quite a bit of involvement by air and submarine assets on both sides. Allied planes and subs sighted the Japanese force a few times and tried to report them, while Japanese aircraft dropped flares to support their surface ships during the battle itself. Dunno if you want to count those as examples Masterblooregard (talk) 22:45, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

text: But none, however, in Surigao Strait.    Ravenswing  09:14, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi! Someone updated the sentance about "the only engagement" - ok ^_^ (and now, the saga continues - after 3 years ^_^) But just for info: there was at least one plane in this battle and therefore if you count with reconnaissence and spotting planes you can't even count this battle as "pure gunnery duel": The NACHI was the only ship carrying aircraft, and she was ordered to launch planes. She was very slow in complying and the order to open fire was given before she had her planes off. The Japanese opened fire at about 0540, slightly ahead of the Americans. The first salvo of the NACHI ruined the two single float, two-seat Type Zero spotting planes on the starboard catapult. These were jettisoned. The plane on the port catapult, however, was undamaged and was launched. This was a twin float, three-seat Type Zero reconnaissance seaplane. It was the only Japanese plane airborne in the battle area, served as a spotting plane throughout the engagement, and landed at ATTU. (citation from interrogation of Commander Kintaro MIURA, NAV NO. 21, USSBS NO. 98 ) --Sceadugenga (talk) 08:31, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Objections
Talk:Berg connector

message: See http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EKF/is_n2234_v44/ai_21083801 - Berg itself doesn't appear to exist. Framatome (FCI) owned it starting in 98. Seems Tyco Electronics does now. I don't believe the name of the Wikipedia article should be altered. --97.114.2.125 (talk) 19:07, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership 

message: This shouldn't be merged because this is a unique name of a connector, where as "pin header" is a generic name.  • Sbmeirow • Talk • 21:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  If this http://www.michaeljordan.nl/Berg%20connector.jpg is a "Berg connector"  (and it is the sort used for small floppy drives) then this is not a pin header and that's not an appropriate merge. This type of connector is distinctive, it's asymmetric and there's a keying slot. It's fairly obscure (although the floppy disk use is numerically huge) but it is at least a definable type of distinct connector. Thus keep Andy Dingley (talk) 14:39, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Tom's Hardware http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/power-supply-specifications-atx-reference,review-32338-11.html notes this type but describes them as an AMP "economy interconnection" (EI) series , not Berg or Mini-Molex. In such case, keeping and maybe a rename seems to be the way to go.  Whatever, this article is crying out for a photo. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:48, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:Battle of Kwajalein

message: Not sure why "Guam" is in here as a comparison. Guam is a big island, kwaj a tiny one. Once command of the air was taken over the Atoll and the railway bombed to smithereens, it was "just" a matter of subduing the defenders piecemeal. Guam was probably different. If you were going to amphibiously attack an island, and were going to take control of the air first, Kwaj would be where you would start. (Not Tarawa, but I'm sure that the Navy didn't have that choice!). Student7 (talk) 01:08, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comparisons

message: Maybe worth mentioning somewhere that Prince Asaka Tadahiko, nephew to Emperor Hirohito, died in this battle.歳 (talk) 03:29, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Prince Asaka Tadahiko died in this battle
Talk:Armored car (military)

message: Theres currently a speedy deletion of Paul Jaworski
but to me this seems like a minorly important fact in the history of the 
Armoured Car. I've coppied the text of the article here, in case someone can workout how to 
incorperate it. --Salix alba 02:41, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Armoured Car robbery 

message: Mercedes manufactures a civilian armoured versions of its S, E and G classes. Does anyone have enough material to create an entry for them? According to  "The B7 Mercedes is sold only to government officials and it is credited with helping protect the life of Eduard Shevardnadze, the president of the remote Republic of Georgia." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.108.37.167 (talk) 23:18, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is also the Maybach GuardReply to David Latapie 05:48, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mercedes Benz Guard 

message: Several problems with this edit. A number of manufacturers supplied the French military with "armored cars with rotating gun turrets" from 1914 onwards. Why Renault and Peugeot receive special mention is, therefore, doubly puzzling, since armoured cars built by these two companies did not have turrets. Their gun crews were protected (as far as that can be said) by shields. Rather more research by Mr. Demaison would have been appropriate. Hengistmate (talk) 14:02, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit by 71.95.133.142,  Sep. 30th, 2013.