Talk:Belarusian Democratic Republic

message: *Capital city was Smalensk.
:I am afraid you are mistaken. BSSR was proclaimed in Smalensk immediately before the Red Army crushed BNR. Mikkalai 15:48, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Belarusian People's Republic in belarusian : Беларуская Народная Рэспубліка, eng. transliteration : Belaruskaya Narodnaya Republika. Wrongly translated as "Belarusian National Republic" , because national in belarusian is Националная.
::Why not moving it to People's Republic then? Brugues 15:03, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Wikipedia contributor Kuban coSSack's talking about dictatorial ruler Lukashenka (who massively and monstrously falsified the vote) and today's storming of the October square, when hundreds of special police arrested peaceful demonstrators, totally destoryed the camp, threw empty vodka bottles into the mess and videotaped that for Belarusan state television. Here's Kuban coSSack's comment about this police action and break-up of a peaceful protest, which took place at 3AM so that there would be no witnesses of their activity:
* http://www.br23.net/en/2006/03/24/game-over/#comments
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rydel#.22kuban_coSSack.22
Dear fellow Wikipedians, do you understand that the only purpose of his contributions on articles about Belarus (such as Belarusian language, Belarusian history, Belarus, etc.) is to push Russian imperial POV and lies? Please, see history and talk pages of the Belarus-related articles. --rydel 16:33, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  one contributor 

message: Armed forces are not a legal requirement for nationhood, as the article implies -- else Costa Rica would not be a country.  --Daniel C. Boyer 20:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Armed Forces

message: Does the BNR have any influence over Belarusian politics today?  Fishal 01:08, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Influence today

message: These names should be written in English alphabet. Letters č and Ž don't exist in English.
    * Jan Sierada (1918–1919)
    * Piotra Krečeŭski (1919–1928)
    * Vasil Zacharka (1928–1943)
    * Mikoła Abramčyk (1944–1970)
    * Vincent Žuk-Hryškievič (1970–1982)
    * Jazep Sažyč (1982–1997)
    * Ivonka Survilla (1997–present)
:It's in Lacinka. 195.222.71.80 20:30, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not english spellings 

message: The article lacks some information.
Ttturbo 08:44, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about Red Army crimes in Belarus starting from 1918? 

message: "Similar governments-in-exile of the neighboring countries (Lithuania, Poland and others) handed back their symbolic "authorities" to the corresponding independent governments in the 1990s, after the dissolution of the Soviet Union. The BNR council has not done this because it views the current Belarusian government of president Alexander Lukashenka as an anti-Belarusian, anti-independence, and an anti-democratic power."
What happened in 1990–1991 was exactly what the government of BNR in exile was longing for. (The authoritarian regime of Lukashenko was established only in 1995) So this does not explain why they didn't hand back their authorities to the new Belarusian government in 1991–1995. — Glebchik (talk) 16:51, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Government in exile 

message: The article states that the government is still in exile, so wouldn't it still exist, even if only de jure?--CafeDelKevin (talk) 02:23, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "was" should be replaced with "is" 

message: Germany have not recognized Belarusian Peoples Republic. the links is not a good reference. " Belarusian Peoples Republic was recognized by Lithuania, LOatvia, Estonia, Finland, Ukrainian Peoples Republic, Czechoslovakia, and Turkey." When german recognized Belarus of an independant state ? http://www.terradelfuoco.org/pdf/uff-3_en.pdf  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.250.207.231 (talk) 12:37, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recognized 

message: :Belarusian People's Republic →  – Per inline citation in English, and wp:verifiability. Present name (Belarusian People's Republic) is not supported by references in the English language. The only wp:rs citation clearly says BNR... not BPR. Please see applicable naming convention policies and guidelines for support. Relisted. BDD (talk) 19:36, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: * "about 20,500" ... well for "Belarusian People's Republic" -Wikipedia I get 100 000 more: "About 126,000 results". NVanMinh (talk) 22:21, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Take a second look, please. Most of your results are from Belarus, not from the English-speaking countries. According to Google books, only about 279 results mention "Belarusian People's Republic" -Wikipedia. Less than the Belarusian National Republic. Poeticbent talk 01:36, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Then why you still have " wp:verifiability. Present name (Belarusian People's Republic) is not supported by references in the English language. "? NVanMinh (talk) 07:47, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Belarusian People's Republic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.arche.by/by/12/works/522
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:27, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Belarusian People's Republic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120212202336/http://www.charter97.org/eng/news/2005/03/24/bnr to http://www.charter97.org/eng/news/2005/03/24/bnr
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130927162702/http://www.radabnr.org/en/bibliographyen.htm to http://www.radabnr.org/en/bibliographyen.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:23, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: What territory occupied BLR in the fact? The map shows the range from Bialystok to Smolensk, but actually BLR did not occupy this area. Can anyone explain this? Konarski (talk) 10:19, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Territory 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Belarusian People's Republic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402110516/http://naviny.by/rubrics/society/2009/3/24/ic_articles_116_161824/ to http://naviny.by/rubrics/society/2009/3/24/ic_articles_116_161824/
*Added  tag to http://mbnf.info/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1271:-19181920-&catid=4:all-news
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:22, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I had to replace the introduction to the article, because almost every sentence of it was incorrect. The BPR itself was proclaimed on 9 March 1918, not on 25 March, when it declared independence. It had several diplomatic missions, not only the one in Berlin (and the source to this claim says nothing about the Berlin mission being the only one), and the mission in Riga is even mentioned in the article itself. The SSR of Byelorussia was founded on 1 January 1919 in Smolensk, not Minsk. The government in exile wasn't formed "two years later abroad", it was the same old government of the BPR that continued its work in Vilnius and then moved between different European cities, becoming more of a political organisation than a real government. Its independence didn't correspond to the Brest-Litovsk treaty, nor was its demise connected with the fall of Minsk to the Soviets. Svawald (talk) 17:55, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: *What you did, User:Svawald, is absolutely positively not acceptable by our standards. You removed references and replaced existing data with new claims which have no citations of any kind, whatsoever. This is called WP:ORIGINAL RESEARCH. Sorry, Poeticbent talk 20:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: *Sorry, but I cannot but disagree with you. Did you read the citations? Number one directly contradicts the information it's supposed to support (about the SSRB being founded in Minsk on 5 January), number three only describes the BPR's mission to Germany without making any claims about it being the only one. If you insist, I will find the citations for my variant of the text, this topic is well-researched and those facts are one of the few that are not debatable in the BPR's history. --Svawald (talk) 21:09, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

text: *Would you consider the following variant? I cited the BPR Council's own site, where they display their original founding documents, and an academic study.
The Belarusian People's Republic (, , transliterated as Bielaruskaja Narodnaja Respublika, BNR), historically referred to as the White Ruthenian Democratic Republic (;Файл:Passport of BNR.jpg) was a failed attempt to create a Belarusian state on the territory controlled by the German Imperial Army during World War I. The BNR existed in 1918-1919. 
The BNR was declared on March 9, 1918 in MinskDruhaja Ŭstaŭnaja Hramata da narodaŭ Bielarusi [The Second Constituent Charter to the Peoples of Belarus]i. (n.d.). Retrieved December 29, 2017, from http://www.radabnr.org/usthramaty/hramata2/, and two weeks later, on March 25, 1918 it was proclaimed independentTreciaja Ŭstaŭnaja Hramata Rady BNR [The Third Constituent Charter of the Council of the BPR]. (n.d.). Retrieved December 28, 2017, from http://www.radabnr.org/usthramaty/hramata3/. In 1919 it co-existed with an alternative Communist government of Belarus (the Socialist Soviet Republic of Byelorussia, which later became part of the Lithuanian–Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic), moving its seat of government to Vilno and Hrodna
Ladysieŭ, U. F., & Bryhandzin, P. I. (2003). BNR: stanaŭliennie, dziejnasć. Ministerstva bielaruskich spraŭ pry Litoŭskaj Tarybie [BPR, its formation and activities. The Ministry for Belarusian Affairs under the Council of Lithuania]. In Pamiž Uschodam i Zachadam. Stanaŭliennie dziaržaŭnasci i terytaryjaĺnaj celasnasci Bielarusi (1917-1939) [Between the East and the West. The formation of statehood and territorial integrity of Belarus (1917-1939)] (pp. 84-88). Minsk: Belarusian State University.
, but ceased to exist due to the capture of the whole Belarusian territory by the Polish and the Bolshevik forces during the Polish–Soviet War
Ladysieŭ, U. F., & Bryhandzin, P. I. (2003). BNR: stanaŭliennie, dziejnasć. Ministerstva bielaruskich spraŭ pry Litoŭskaj Tarybie [BPR, its formation and activities. The Ministry for Belarusian Affairs under the Council of Lithuania]. In Pamiž Uschodam i Zachadam. Stanaŭliennie dziaržaŭnasci i terytaryjaĺnaj celasnasci Bielarusi (1917-1939) [Between the East and the West. The formation of statehood and territorial integrity of Belarus (1917-1939)] (pp. 117-119). Minsk: Belarusian State University.
. Currently, its government in exile, the Rada (Council) of the Belarusian People's Republic is the oldest still existing.
* I'm fine with whatever you choose to include for as long as the new (and revised) information is supported by corresponding new citations. Some citations, however, are better than others, according to WP:RS and WP:V/R so please keep that in mind also. The first-party sources are the least desirable and considered unreliable. Peer reviewed works are most reliable for our purposes. Thanks, Poeticbent talk 01:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction to the Article 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:54, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: page moved.  Andrewa (talk) 08:39, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Belarusian People's Republic →  – The current name, Belarusian People's Republic, is of limited use in scholarly and popular literature. It does not appear in the titles of publications, judging by Google Scholar. It does not appear in book titles either. The Belarusian Democratic Republic name has a significantly wider use, incl. in scholarly literature and in literature originating in Belarus and in the Belarusian diaspora. It is also used by the Rada of BNR, the body claiming the mandate of the original Republic’s government. Note: the 2013 discussion about renaming the page for the Belarusian National Republic was inconclusive, the request was rejected. Nieszczarda2 (talk) 05:03, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

text: NB that the title of the article was  from its creation in 2005 until 2008, the target of the previous move request.  —  AjaxSmack  16:17, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 August 2021 

message: I suggest we rename this page to Belarusian People’s Republic because it is the correct translation of “Bielaruskaja Narodnaja Respublika”. Narodnaja doesn’t mean “Democratic”. Oh, and Translate says that “Belarusian Democratic Republic” means “Bielaruskaja Narodnaja Respublika”, probably because of wikipedia. I still support the change to Belarusian People’s Republic. TankDude2000 (talk) 17:55, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Judging by the above motivations for moving, such was done on the basis that "Democratic" is more common in sources. The Government-in-exile appears to use "Democratic", however. The sources may instead be reflecting the afore-mentioned as opposed to the original entity. I've only ever known this entity as the "People's" and agree it should be changed back. There needs to be a proper debate about this! UaMaol (talk) 02:31, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Slight agree. Belarusian National Republic seems to have more hits in books, and would be more accurate than 'Democratic'. Its really weird because when looking at the article body, it cites the Rada, which goes to a website....which says Narodnaya in the archive photos. what. We shouldn't duplicate mistranslations because then other people cite wikipedia and it enters the consensus in a feedback loop. LeVivsky (ಠ_ಠ) 16:10, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change name