Talk:IBM System z9

message: Currently, 's390' and 's/390' redirect here, but the page gives no explicit mention of those terms. Should 's390' redirect to 'esa/390'? --Apantomimehorse 08:10, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Both S390 and S/390 previously redirected to IBM ESA/390. S390X and S/390X redirect to this article, which appears to be correct since IBM internal websites refer to them as 'z' products. SBaker43 (talk) 16:10, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: s390

message: Are there any vital stats for these mainframes?  Perhaps # of GFlops/second?
:IBM publishes “MIPS”/“MSU” numbers for use in their, ehr, unique mainframe software billing scheme, but those aren't benchmark results.  Searching for “IBM” and “GFLOPS” turns up a lot of references to IBM POWER AIX systems, but none for recent mainframes.  (I believe there are some LINPACK benchmarks measurements for the ES/9000 era of machines.)  There are also a few Web pages by IBM cheerleaders trying to “explain” how benchmarks like LINPACK, LFK, SPEC, etc., are all bad and misleading because they don't take into consideration how IBM's mainframe machines are “balanced for a mixed workload”, or some similar marketing-speak that is reproduced so perfectly from one Web site to another that it's clear they're all reading from some HQ-approved script.  Overall, IBM isn't shy about GFLOPS when bragging about its Blue Gene or POWER product lines; one would expect that, if the mainframe product line had processor performance to be proud of, that IBM would brag about that, too.  Instead, the mainframe side belittles the very benchmarks that rank the Blue Gene side so highly.  Clearly GFLOPS aren't valued by either the mainframe builders or the mainframe customers.
98.218.86.55 (talk) 05:26, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Statistics

message: or a technology review. --153.104.64.68 18:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: article reads more like an advertisement

message: :Image:IBM-System-z9.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:IBM-System-z9.jpg