Talk:Boiron

message: *Official website of the company
=== References ===
*Datamonitor OTC Healthcare in France to 2009
*Wright Reports, company snapshot
*Yahoo! Finance company profile
----
All verifiable and neutral point of view. It is, of course, short. You may want to expand it. --BillC 01:49, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perfect, Bill, you've just provided a great example of how a WP article should read and look like. I support your version wholeheartedly; and if no one complains, I'll replace the current text with your version. -- Phædriel *whistle* 11:58, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: *Datamonitor OTC Healthcare in France to 2009
*Wright Reports, company snapshot
*Yahoo! Finance company profile
----
All verifiable and neutral point of view. It is, of course, short. You may want to expand it. --BillC 01:49, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perfect, Bill, you've just provided a great example of how a WP article should read and look like. I support your version wholeheartedly; and if no one complains, I'll replace the current text with your version. -- Phædriel *whistle* 11:58, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: While the homeopathic overdose is a marvelous demonstration that homeopathy nothing but sugar pills, vlogs and forums are not reliable sources. If high quality publishers (those presumed to do fact checking) have picked up the story, use those for the content basis rather than primary sources.Novangelis (talk) 13:00, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Overdose" video 

message: Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that while all the facts are true, this article still provides only a one sided view. I realize Homeopathic medicine is a sensitive topic, but Boiron is certainly not receiving universal criticism, as this article makes it seem. Also, seems a bit short for such a large company.  Openflower (talk) 03:49, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Openflower! Per WP:BALANCE the article should be weighted toward viewpoints in proportion to their prominence in valid sources. Neutrality isn't giving all sides equal time, but rather it is following the evidence in as unbiased a manner as possible. Sometimes this can result in an article that seems one-sided. I'm sure the Flat Earth article is fairly one-sided too. ;-) If there are any peer-reviewed, study reviews from reputable sources that show Boiron products really work, those could go in the article. If Boiron were engaged in some noteworthy humanitarian effort (noteworthy enough to create media coverage that can be cited) that kind of thing could go in the article as well.Dustinlull (talk) 12:36, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

text: Agree with Dustinlull. Not sure about your heading. Presenting facts from reliable sources can't really be called biased unless editors have deliberately omitted citations from aother view. When I update pages I look for a wide range of sources to give a balanced view, but haven't found any reliable sources confirming the efficacy of homeopathy.  Quite the opposite. I note that the mass global overdose on these products was discussed above but is not cited on the page.  I have several newspaper articles that cover the event and the results of the overdoses and will add the info here when I get time. Joolzzt (talk) 23:38, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

text: Aye. There are small issues like the class actions and the fact that its biggest selling product is "flu remedy" based on a non-existent bacterium that isn't the cause of flu diluted to one part in ten to the four hundredth power, which is like dissolving one atom in the entire known universe, taking one atom of that and dissolving it again in the entire known universe, and again, and again, and again. Bonkers. Guy (Help!) 15:55, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased presentation of fact? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Boiron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.datamonitor.com/~d8c752c6872f43c1ab830a1b4e11b349~/industries/research/?pid=DMCM2069&type=Report
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311103643/http://biz.yahoo.com:80/ic/93/93100.html to http://biz.yahoo.com/ic/93/93100.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:50, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Boiron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130316125202/http://www.gilardi.com/boironsettlement/pdf/BRGL_SettlementAgreement.pdf to http://www.gilardi.com/boironsettlement/pdf/BRGL_SettlementAgreement.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:06, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Boiron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111004080251/http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/08/01/38625.htm to http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/08/01/38625.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:03, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: We've entered an edit war concerning the addition of a section explaining, in considerable detail, a controversial urbanisation project Boiron is embroiled in Belgium. A similar edit war is playing out on the French language article. I really can't see the need for this section. Companies get involved in land usage disputes of this nature all the time, and the detail is unwarranted here. —BillC talk 09:27, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urbanisation Project edit warring