lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Deruluft

message: Can anyone identify this Deruluft aircraft (type) from 1927? Thanks, /Urbourbo (talk) 18:19, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Has meanwhile been identified as Dornier Do B Merkur. Arno-nl (talk) 13:45, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unidentified aircraft  

message: Think about this company. 
* Ownership: a 50/50 German/Russian ownership. Who had the final say in matters? What did the stockholders meeting look like? Neither party had in this constellation the final say. Must have been a challenge to get things done. 
* Personnel: 'Most of the aircraft used were German, and so was its organization'. Sources mention that 90% of the personnel was German. What did the Soviets think of this?
* Secret military cooperation: There was a secret joint cooperation (treaty of Rapallo) where Germany supplied aircraft to Soviet's military, and there was a joint training site near Lipezk.
Reasons for termination must have been abound.Arno-nl (talk) 09:45, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very interesting company
Talk:Sir Nicholas Acheson, 4th Baronet

message: See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
:Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
I am moving this page.--padraig 06:06, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sir Patrick Acheson, 2nd Baronet

message: See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
:Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
I am moving this page.--padraig 06:00, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Sir Thomas Burnett, 3rd Baronet

message: See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
:Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
I am moving this page.--Vintagekits 19:48, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of this article
Talk:Sir Thomas Montgomery-Cuninghame, 8th Baronet

message: Noteablity? It had a link to it, but I have no great attatchment to the page. Although I don't see any disadvantage to it being here- it isn't hurting anyone, and he might become notable for some reason. Larklight 19:01, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sir Windham Carmichael-Anstruther, 7th Baronet

message: See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
:Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
I am moving this page.--Vintagekits 19:48, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of this article
Talk:Online Film Critics Society Award for Best Official Website for a Film

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 17:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:Office of Marine and Aviation Operations

message: "NOAA Corps pilots are the only pilots in the world who are trained and qualified to fly into hurricanes at dangerously low altitudes (below 10,000 feet)."
According to the Hurricane Hunters article, the United States Air Force WC-130 aircraft typically fly through hurricanes at between 10,000 and 500 feet.  Sperril 17:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As well over a month has gone by without any verification of the above statement, I'm going to pull it as unreferenced and not factual.  Sperril 04:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The following statement needs to be checked:
Talk:Cheche Lazaro

message: She actually is a very important journalism figure in the Phillipines. It is just that currently the article reads like a promotion/advertisement.
Guroadrunner 17:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: In case of Notability Tag
Talk:Central College (Glasgow)

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner. Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 17:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:SPARCbook

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 17:18, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:State immunity

message: "It is not obvious why states should have immunity in cases relating to serious human rights abuses".
To be honest I would say it is rather obvious. The need for peaceful relations between states and the possibility of armed conflict come to mind and should definitely be the starting point for any discussion. But that is just my point of view. Just like this is clearly the authors. I don't think this article gives a decent account of what is an increasingly important topic in general actually. What about the important relationship with individual immunities enjoyed by state officials - that are in effect derived from state immunity? --Simon Lamb 17:18, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Let's not forget that we are on Wikipedia here and not on some social forum. State immunity at the moment is under fire due to the Italian Supreme Court's decision in the case of Ferrini. Ferrini, and his relatives, were victims of the Second World War and sought compensation from the State of Germany. Germany then went to the ICJ. There is an obvious tension between justice and efficiency in the form of stable international relations. In other words, get back on track. Take out the biased wording of Wikipedia. We need to start adding actualities to this topic. If I have the time I will try to add some of the information that is made available to the ICJ from their website and add it to this page.  MarxMorley (Talk) 14:02, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Less bias, more actualities 

message: "The rules of state immunity concern the protection which a state is given from being sued in the courts of other states."
Why are only courts mentioned here? State immunity, as far as I understand, means protection against any law enforcement against a state. Not only courts enforce law. 92.36.16.248 (talk) 13:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The definition of the term 

message: In addition to my comments on the Sovereign Immunity page, this article needs to be spruced up. VivekM (talk) 04:04, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Merger proposal box removed per discussion on Sovereign Immunity page. VivekM (talk) 11:04, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup/Improve rather than proposed merger 
Talk:Foreigner talk theory

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 17:19, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message

message: This reads very like an essay copied from somewhere (supported by the bits of html through the text). I can't find where it came from though. JMiall₰ 12:13, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio?
Talk:Ann-Helen Moen

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 17:20, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:List of stories featuring nuclear pulse propulsion

message: The "other forms" section is empty because neither nuclear pulse propulsion nor Project Daedalus nor Project Longshot had fiction-reference lists. Stories featuring variants of these have been written, but I'm completely blanking on title/author information for the ones I've read. Additions to the list are appreciated. --Christopher Thomas 17:22, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other forms of nuclear pulse propulsion

message: The original Foundation novel had atomic powered ships in them run by a sect of priests, and many of his early short stories featured atomic powered ships.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.179.30.13 (talk) 18:23, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Where are Azimov's stories?

message: Anathem by Neal Stephenson are mentioned twice in the list. I must get stuff done before tomorrow, so please fix it someone who knows what to do. :-)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.181.162.231 (talk) 00:45, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The  edit of  22:56, 14 December 2009‎, 2 weeks later by AdmiralSenn was summarized "‎Books:  merged double reference regarding Anathem"; it collapsed two non-adjacent 'graphs into one. It'd be easier now, with the diff-link, than any time in the last 6 years, to check whether a good job was done.--Jerzy•t 04:58, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  (''Anathem '') 

message: While many stories (particularly 1960s-era novels) mention Orion-type drives, said propulsion mechanisms do not exclusively dominate SF literature, anime or film. Broadly speaking, any fictional spacecraft "engine" positioned technologically between chemical propellant and warp-drive (or anything similarly esoteric) is likely to qualify if described as "nuclear" or "antimatter".--Mike18xx (talk) 11:37, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "Hard" science-fiction should be de-emphasized

message: As an avid Anime viewer and propulsion fanatic I must note that the entries on Nadia and Zeta Gundam are incorrect. While the GRYPS-2 colony laser does indeed have nuclear pulse engines, the Axis battleships are all Gwazine and similar class ships and as such use traditional thermonuclear rocket engines (using nuclear reactors to heat liquid hydrogen and use it for thrust, thus literally thermo-nuclear). The Nautilus's drive system is much more akin to a warp core from Star Trek than it is to anything Orion-based. It's a matter-antimatter annihilation reactor, not a matter-antimatter pulse engine. As such, I have removed the offending entries. 98.210.48.86 (talk) 08:11, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anime Reference Errors
Talk:Freed of London

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 17:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message

message: The article says Freed "is the leading distributor of pointe shoes in the world", but this appears to be a self-made claim by Freed. Other sources (including the cited source, www.the-perfect-pointe.com/PointeShoeMakers1920.html) repeat this claim, but I've been unable to find a RS that backs it up with independent research. Accordingly, I've removed the statement pending validation by a RS that clearly bases the claim on independent research. Lambtron (talk) 19:50, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research? 

message: Frederick Freed not notable apart from his company. Tacyarg (talk) 22:01, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 18:22, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Frederick Freed]]
Talk:Stria medullaris of thalamus

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 17:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message

message: Please help rewrite this in English.Merkinsmum 22:02, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: intelligibility to lay people
Talk:2008 in sports

message: * What about the 2008 IIHF World Cup of Hockey? Nyrmetros 17:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Online Film Critics Society Award for Best Breakthrough Filmmaker

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 17:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:Charles McGuinness

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 17:27, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message

message: Long time reader, first time editor here.
As someone with a strong interest in polar exploration, particularly the expeditions of Admiral Byrd, I had honestly never heard of this man before. I would question whether the claims he made about himself ought to be given such strong credence as there seems to be little third party verification, For instance there do not seem to be any references confirming that he was even on the 1928 Byrd expedition, let alone that he had a leading role. Most of the information about him appears to have been written by himself and most of the sources cited are reviews of, or reactions to, his own book so I would question whether he even ought to have an article at all and I certainly think there should be healthier scepticism of the claims he made. 89.240.246.199 (talk) 06:28, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions of relevance and factual accuracy
Talk:Berkeley Building

message: I always heard it as:
 Steady blue, expect clear view.
 Flashing blue, clouds are due.
 Steady red, rain ahead.
 Flashing red, snow instead.
--plaws (talk) 17:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rhyme 

message: While there is a Berkley Building that was added to the list of Boston Landmarks in 1985 , it's a different one, at 414 -426 Boylston Street, not at 200 Berkley. It does not look like this one was ever on the list. Thanks,  for the fix, even if I didn't recognize it at first! JesseW, the juggling janitor 13:35, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Landmark Designation (or lack of such)
Talk:Burglar Bill

message: Whoever wrote this would be well advised to read this week's Sunday Times Culture Supplement.
:Better late than never: this has been here since 2007-03-26 (has anybody got access to the content?)--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 05:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article started off being about the Ahlbergs' book, which is a completely different story from the recitation piece by Anstey. Apart from the name – which could well be just a coincidence, a short, common name beginning with "B" to match Burglar – I haven't seen any indication that it is an "adaptation" . It is the Ahlbergs' version that has become familiar, so I am going to rearrange the article to reflect that. == Robina Fox (talk) 22:52, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  F. Anstey 

message: I took out the sentence: They coined the catchphrase "I'll 'ave that". I couldn't find any references for it – possibly it was a short-lived catchphrase? It is also a bit problematic as in the book Bill says: "I'll have that." – no dropped aitch. Please feel free to re-add it if you know more. -- Robina Fox (talk) 02:14, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catchphrase
Talk:North Andhra

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 17:32, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed for 7 days. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks (contribs) 18:43, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move April 2023
Talk:Actaeon beetle

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 17:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:Maria Gomori

message: I did the Wikification on the Article using the Thadman Template
PrecisionTool 20:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikified

message: I have cleaned up the article, and established the Harvard reference style for footnotes. William Meyer (talk) 04:40, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup of Maria Gomori Page
Talk:Harbor Towers

message: This article is in need of editing.  The History section is very unprofessional and sounds like an advertisement.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.10.234.213 (talk) 20:12, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to moderate the promotional tone, fixed a number of glaring grammatical errors, added Wikilinks, and generally cleaned things up.  I also flagged the article as needing updating (especially regarding replacement of failing mechanical systems).  Reify-tech (talk) 21:58, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lehigh Valley Christian High School

message: Um, excuse me sir. Why did Lehigh Valley Christian High School shut down in 2020?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.239.205.156 (talk) 09:35, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excuse me?
Talk:Jozef Dunajovec

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 17:39, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message

message: Please, some user from Slovakia or from Czech Republic could check if the Hospodarske noviny newspaper in which Jozef Dunajovec worked was the Slovak newspaper (Hospodárske noviny) or the Czech newspaper (Hospodářské noviny) and then link it?
--PeterCantropus (talk) 04:16, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Tankred (talk) 12:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Hospodarske noviny'' link
Talk:Football Superleague of Kosovo

message: So called Independent League of Kosovo can't be right. It was still subdivison of yugoslav leagues, at least untill 1992.
*1990/91 Priština played in Yugoslav Second League, CZ Gnjilane, Vlaznimi, Liria and Trepča played in Yugoslav Third League.
*1991/92 Priština played in Second League, CZ Gnjilane, Kosovo Polje, Metohija and Trepča played in Third League.
*1992/93 Priština played in Yugoslav First League.
*1993/94 Priština played in Second League.
*1994/95 Priština played in Second League.
*1995/96 Priština played in Second League.
*1996/97 Priština played in Second League.
*1997/98 Priština played in First League.
*1998/99 Priština played in First League.
Did Priština play in two leagues simoultaneously after 1992? Linhart (talk) 22:26, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I have raised the question several times at Talk:FC Prishtina. I have also been editing the article by adding the players at notbale players section that played during the 1990s, they have been constantly removing them, they also remove the list of presidents of Priština and add the president of the outlawed Prishtina. Seems that it has become inevitable to separate the article in two, one dealing with the club until 1999, and the other formed in early 1990s and which played in a parallel league, and which took the stadium and offices of the previous club once KFOR entered Kosovo. Since you are one of the most dedicated editors about football history in the region, I will appreciate a lot your opinion. FkpCascais (talk) 20:03, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: KF Prishtina was founded in 1991 an they played on Flamurtari stadium outside of Priština. There is book "Liria dhe futbolli - Kf Prishtina 1991-2000" by Gani Ajeti. 31.15.225.128 (talk) 22:30, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Independent League of Kosovo
Talk:SIG SG 510

message: Technically, I think the Chilean soldiers are "standing in front of" rather than "guarding."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.113.163.33 (talk) 16:35, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Picture 

message: I deleted the following text:
Swiss army cadets who commit errors during basic training are sometimes forced to carry the older and heavier SG 510 instead of the normal SG 550 as a punishment. This is done both as a symbolic form of humiliation, and because the significantly increased weight of the SG 510 makes the drills more strenuous. Nevertheless some of the cadets made to carry the 510 actually prefer it to the standard rifle because of its greater durability and ease of disassembly, and its steadier handling in fully-automatic fire due to the heavier weight and sturdier construction.
Comment: 
1)There are no cadets in the Swiss army, there are recruits.
2)Swiss Army training and punishment questions ar at the wrong place here. 
hmaag (talk) 11:44, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Swiss Army cadets

message: This rifle isn't in use anymore, it was replaced by the SIG SG 550 in year 1990.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.197.233.113 (talk) 21:33, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rifle no longer in use by swiss military
Talk:One Devonshire Place

message: This Trivia section is not needed. The building is named after the name of the street it is located on, not Devon/Devonshire in the United Kingdom. This trivia fact, while interesting, should be placed on an article about the street, not the building. Raime 00:45, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia Section 

message: Article seems to be based on nothing of substance. I can't see any reliable, in-depth news coverage online. Seems to be just a big lump of commercial real estate, of no great note. Sionk (talk) 01:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability?