Talk:Tom Tucker (Family Guy)

message: I suggest a merge with Quahog 5 OneWorld22 07:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest that it go the other way ... I've already updated list of characters (see below) to point to this new page, and plan to move stuff here from there. --72.75.126.37 07:57, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion

message: Please note these sections and read the talk pages
* Quahog 5
* List_of_characters_from_Family_Guy#Channel_5_.28WQHG.29
* List_of_characters_from_Family_Guy#Tuckers
All of these need to be combined someplace, and I think that Tucker family is the way to go (combining his wives and son on one page) because it would follow the pattern of other characters ... but it needs to be discussed first!!
I think people should also look at Template talk:Family Guy and the posts about the Brown family and Tom Tucker ... this is Too Broad an issue to be handled by one individual, or several working at cross purposes! --72.75.126.37 07:53, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK ... I've done the move and delete from the two article, now for the Moby Merge ... this stub was full of WP:OR fancruft, so the bulk of it will be from List_of_characters_from_Family_Guy ... most of what was in Quahog 5 was duplicate material. --72.75.126.37 08:30, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Must move and combine from other articles 

message: I'm gonna take that down based on the fact that this has never been stated. If its been in an episode and I just missed it, please let me know. Saget53 22:13, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Republican? 

message: The image :Image:Mother-tucker.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:58, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Mother-tucker.jpg

message: Isn't it canon that Jake Tucker has no anus? I can't believe I typed that sentence. Lots42 (talk) 17:26, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe, but it's trivial. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 03:24, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jake Tucker 

message: *Merge to the list of characters.  The AfD close (a NAC, btw) said that we may discuss a merger but that the closer didn't want to force one through the AfD process.  Ikip is correct that this does not require a merger, but it in no way rules one out.  We do not need to open another AfD to merge the article, we just need to come to some consensus here on whether or not it should be merged.  I for one think it should, as there really aren't sufficient sources covering the subject to merit a standalone article (Basically per my comments at the AfD). Protonk (talk) 21:54, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions

message: Please state your opinion, if you believe the article is fine in its much reduced state, or should it be left longer.  At least three of us seem to want it in its longer form.
* Keep If you aren't interested in the information, then you aren't likely to find your way to the article to begin with.  What seems like "fancruft" to some, is interesting reading to others.  Dream Focus 18:53, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many people believe we should keep the "fancruft" as some call it?