Talk:OMAC (comics)

message: 1)They called the OMACs, not OMAC (plural)
2)Since they're the only article known as OMACS, they dont need a "(comics)" at the end. --DrBat 00:42, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Aren't these OMACs a lot like the sentinels in marvel comics?-Giant89
:Please do not use Wikipedia as a discussion forum. ' (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) 04:38, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No. WP:NOR. ' (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) 18:07, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm not certain how two wrongs make a right. I don't care for the Sentry and Superman articles. Go to their talk pages if you have a issue with them. ' (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) 20:13, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentinel Simulatity 

message: "Brother Eye" redirects here. I think it is an important enough character to have its own article.  Is there any particular reason it doesn't??  Matt White 18:42, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It redirects because BE doesn't currently have an article. If you want to give him/it an article, go ahead. --DrBat 00:25, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Brother Eye

message: Would it be appropriate to note that Brother Eye is slightly similar in appearance (and sometimes speech to the Emerald Eye of Ekron? 65.12.103.198 01:30, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Emerald Eye similarity?

message: Why is he listed twice under Alpha- and Beta-level? --Pentasyllabic 01:18, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jay Garrick listed twice 

message: Is Mia supposed to be listed as bigger threat than Ollie, or is that a mistake?~ZytheTalk to me! 15:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ollie and Mia 

message: :Image:Omac1.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 16:11, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Omac1.PNG

message: :Image:OmacProjectSpecial.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 16:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:OmacProjectSpecial.jpg

message: In the part where the article talks about the events of Infinite Crisis, there was this sentence:
"Batman, however, says that he'll take his chances, and accepts Hal Jordan's aid in getting him to safety (an uncharacteristically trusting leap of faith as Batman views Hal Jordan as a bitter disgrace because of Jordan's fall from grace at the hands of Parallax)"
I've removed everything in the brackets on the grounds that it's incredibly subjective and is an unsourced matter of opinion.  I for one don't think it was out of character at all - it was a moment of character development.  Batman, despite his constant naysaying about Hal Jordan, would prefer to trust him over Brother Eye - even with his own life.  How is that uncharacteristic?
If you disagree, then fine - I realise this is a matter of opinion.  But as it is opinion, it needs to be indicated as such and sourced to a third party commentator.
--Stenun (talk) 17:52, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subjective character discussion 

message: Greg Rucka on the OMACs' mohawks; "The mohawk isn't actually a mohawk; don't mistake it for hair. What's the most vulnerable place on your body? Soft tissue in the brain. So the mohawk serves as a defense for the head, protecting the process network."
I removed the above "citation" from the article's second overall paragraph. For one, it does not relate to the paragraph at all. Second, whoever put it there did not include a source for the quote. I tried to find one myself, but couldn't; so I've removed it until someone can justify its inclusion.
Khaotika 19:09, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited citation removed