Talk:Indian painting

message: I believe the "Lady with a Lamp" painting is by Raja Ravi Verma and is housed in a museum in Mysore, India. If there is another "Lady with lamp" painting by Mazumdar the article should clarify this  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.165.27.182 (talk) 22:59, August 27, 2007 (UTC) 
The woman with a lamp is by Late Sri.A.L.Haldankar and not by Raja Ravi Varma or Mazumdhar vide http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glow_of_Hope
The contents have grown nicely. It require as
 little bit of re-arrangements. --Bhadani 23:14, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Rajput and Mughal painting needs to be under miniature paintings section. Or just all together remove the miniature painting section. Also, isnt what you call Rajput called Rajasthani in academic references to art? --Kaveri 18:03, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good

message: I removed this from the main page, as it needs significant reworking (for grammar, sources, removal of [[WP:PEACOCK|peacock terms):
Since the 1980s Indian artists started showing more vitality and variety in their work. Many of the new generation of artists have come from various fields in to art world and thus they bring with them newer concepts and styles. Devajyoti Ray had introduced in the early 1990s a new ism of art called Pseudo-realism. Again Jitish Kallat mixed graphic art with prints to develop a mode of expression which was hitherto not been used. vagaram choudhary work in new experimenting medium with 3D visuals. The other famous artists like Prakash Karmokar, Jahar Dasgupta, Bihon Choudhuri, Jogen choudhuri, vagaram choudhary and many others are enriching the modern art for India and their journey is still going on.
freshacconcispeaktome 12:32, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from main page 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Indian painting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130318231813/http://ccrtindia.gov.in/miniaturepainting.htm to http://ccrtindia.gov.in/miniaturepainting.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Indian painting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130924023312/http://khojworkshop.org/user/geeta_kapur to http://www.khojworkshop.org/user/geeta_kapur
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101111011941/http://www.curationtheory.com/workshops.php to http://www.curationtheory.com/workshops.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:55, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Moved comment by another user from main page: "Dear wikipedia reader
If you are a NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKING person, and if you have some spare time, please take a look on this article, machine translated from French (fr:Peinture en Inde). Don’t hesitate to log on as user, and make the needed language corrections.
Best regards User:Andershus.".
— Preceding unsigned comment added by  Travelbird (talk • contribs) 10:48, February 23, 2018 (UTC)
:Thanks, Travelbird, for removing  by Andershus from the article, and adding it to the proper location, here on the talk page.
:Andershus, after Travelbird moved it, you reverted, inappropriately adding the material back again, until it was once more removed by another editor.  Do you understand why it does not belong on the article page?  If you have questions, feel free to ask; preferably on your or my Talk page. Cordially, Mathglot (talk) 23:53, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs copyedit 

message: There is a  box at the top of this page indicating that the article was translated from French (but without any version parameters, hence vague about the timing), as well as an  box at the top of the article page claiming the article was machine-translated from French.  However, at least for the history of the French article, the reverse appears to be the case, as it appears to have been created as a translation from English.
The en-wiki article was created July 5, 2005. By October 13, 2007 it had grown to 14,925 bytes and contained thirteen sections including eight regional H2 headings from 'Madhubani painting' to 'Samikshavad'. The French article Peinture en Inde was created from scratch at 14,428 bytes on October 20 2007 with twelve sections and eight regional H2 headings, from 'Peinture de Madhubani' to 'Samikshavad', and is manifestly a translation of the en-wiki article of that date. (The required translation attribution was found neither in the French article's edit history of the time, nor in the Talk page, so I added required attributions there.)
Since then, the articles diverged. It may be there were translations in the other direction, from the French to the English article, but these should be substantiated by proper attribution using the  template at the top of this talk page, with all parameters filled in, notably version and insertversion along with an edit summary explaining in detail what portion(s) of the French article are alleged to have been translated and added to the English one. Mathglot (talk) 23:31, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I see now why you added the French-to-English translation box now; it's because of the hundreds of MT edits added in the last month.  I will address that in a separate section. Mathglot (talk) 00:57, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translated from French? 

message: has continued his one-man band addition of original research and automatic translation to this article, against consensus and ignoring all attempts to contact him here, and on his talk page, and at User talk:89.94.87.52.
Absent any objection, I am planning rollback to revision 907143849 of 20 July 2019 by Mandarax. This will remove approximately 122kb of content and 678 revisions by User:Andershus and .  
As we already have a consensus about Anderhus’s disruption on this article subsequent to the previous occurrence, as well as having left advice on his Talk page after the last rollback informing him what was likely to happen if he resumed the same behavior again, I don’t think a new consensus is required.  That would be more disruption, if he can tie up multiple editors with a discussion every time he decides to take another run at it.
So this is more a courtesy notice to let any editors who wish to do so, to respond before the next rollback.  If there is no objection from other editor, I’ll carry out the rollback after a few days, giving Andershus one last chance to justify his edits and interact with other editors here.  Mathglot (talk) 21:33, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I have notified  of this discussion on his Talk page, in case he has notifications turned off in his preferences. Mathglot (talk) 14:06, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

text: continues to blithely go on as before.  Shall we start the countdown to rollback, say, in five days? Any objections? Mathglot (talk) 23:16, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  T minus two, and counting... , any comment? Mathglot (talk) 16:17, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

text: . Rollback completed.  Mathglot (talk) 17:52, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent disruption by Andershus and another Rollback 

message: In view of this section above, and absent any response from Andershus here or on his User talk page, now about to carry out a rollback to revision 907143849 of 20 July 2019. This will remove 126,283 bytes of content, and over 800 revisions by Andershus, and a hundred or so by five IPs editing in the same pattern.
There are almost no other edits by other editors during this interval; those few that exist are about fixing up minor issues in the content added by Andershus, so these are moot after the rollback.  I don't believe that there was even one edit in this interval that was applicable to the pre-July 20 version, but if there was, it will be inadvertently removed by this rollback.  If such an edit exists and was yours, I will take responsibility for restoring your edit if you  me below and point me to it. You can, of course, restore your own edit yourself, if you'd rather. Mathglot (talk) 17:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: . Rollback completed.  Mathglot (talk) 17:52, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rollback to 20 July 

message: After two occurrences of the same type of disruption by the same editor, followed by rollbacks in each case, my feeling going forward is that any future editing in the same pattern by  at this article followed by silence when attempting to contact him about his edit(s), can be considered disruptive editing. I'm of the opinion that any editor should feel free to revert or roll back any future edits of his (or by his IP posse), if your good-faith edits to contact him here are fruitless.  There's no need to have another long discussion and waiting period like this one again; we've offered him all the good faith in the world, and gotten nothing for it.  
If such reverts start to take up too much editor time, I'll look into going to WP:ANI, and requesting a WP:TBAN or WP:BLOCK. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 18:22, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Going forward 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:23, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:53, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion