lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nicolaes Tulp

message: I think Nicoleas Tulp was instrumental in introducing standards of medicine (doseage advice in a lexicon for all druggists). Are there any others from the same period in Europe? Germany or England perhaps? Jane 21:23, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History of medicine

message: The family tree diagram is very hard to read.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.94.192.200 (talk) 10:17, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: not when enlarged to 100% resolution --Gamsbart (talk) 10:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Family tree diagram

message: Isn't that an Orangutan, not a Chimpanzee?
It even says "Orang-outang" in the picture itself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.61.163.239 (talk) 22:52, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I had the same question, which is why I put it like that. I have no idea. I also don't know why it said it was from Angola, when as far as I know, the Dutch ships went to the Dutch East Indies. I couldn't find anything about the poor creature at all. By the way, it is still not considered certain that Tulp made these drawings himself or paid someone to do them. Who it might have been (including whoever engraved the drawings) is still a mystery. Jane (talk) 09:00, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Book of Monsters Chimpanzee 
Talk:Dunwich (Lovecraft)

message: See Talk:The_Dunwich_Horror#Merge_from_Dunwich_(Lovecraft). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:53, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Society of Mary (Marianists)

message: I liked the article but have some doubts with regard to its title. Are not the Marianists, the "Company of Mary" (instead of the "Society of Mary")? As far as I know, the "Society of Mary" is one of the four branches of Marianists, but this issue is not completely clear elsewhere in the net and I might be wrong. An additional source of confusion is that the Marists are called the "Society of Mary", as well.
There is still some asymmetry in the article since most of the emphasis is placed on the Marianists in the U.S. It might be good to include the Marianist work in places such as Canada (they have an Archbishop, there, in Vancouver), Latin America, France and Spain. In the latter country the Marianist organization enjoys a high reputation for excellence in education.
Eguirald 17:33, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title and Contents
File talk:Gruntled.JPG

message: What is that a reflection of?
:Dunno... I kinda swiped it from :Image:Wikistress3D 1 v3.jpg. You may want to ask there. --LV (Dark Mark) 22:50, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think someone once said it was the Space Needle. I don't know for sure, though. Hope this helps. --LV (Dark Mark) 22:54, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Christadelphians/Archive 3

message: *I have substantially edited this section because:
1. It took a disproportionate amount of space for an article on Christadelphians. 
2. It contained a number of inaccuracies (e.g. the "Shield" did not come from the 1873 division.
3. It was insufficiently neutral - we can't have every fellowship saying "Our fellowship maintains the original Christadelphian position".
Please discuss here if you would like to expand the section further.
----
*For reasons of accuracy and neutrality, I have changed this...
"A union of the Temperance Hall and Suffolk Street fellowships [...text removed by RJB...]."
...to this:
"A union of the Temperance Hall and Suffolk Street fellowships [...text removed by RJB...]."
Teutonic Knight 22:40, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Teutonic Knight, I have removed the text above because this page was getting unwieldy. Users can see the amendments you have made by comparing versions on the history page of the main article. This talk page is for briefly stating how and why you have made an amendment, and for discussion by others if necessary. RJB 22:18, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differing groups among Christadelphians 

message: The article was 53kb, exceeding the preferred limit of 32kb. The two Christadelphian Statements of Faith are readily available on at Christadelphian sites, so I have replaced the full text of the statements with links to the text on external sites. RJB 195.92.168.167 13:04, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statements of Faith
Talk:Technotronic

message: what do you know about technotronic?
:Please sign yourself. Anyway, I bought a couple of their 12" mix. They were GREAT!!Brian Wilson 02:08, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How is Ace of Base related to Technotronic? 113 15:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ace of Base

message: See Talk:Pump Up the Jam. Either large sections of this page are nonsense or its content should be sourced and added there. — LlywelynII 22:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism? or Incompleteness?
Talk:Ron Flowers

message: The German version of this article (:de:Ron Flowers) has a lot of info.  My German isn't the best, but I'll try to translate some of it, sometime. Any help would be appreciated. Slumgum | yap | stalk | 21:33, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: German

message: John Flowers (footballer) ?--EchetusXe (talk) 14:47, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is he related to... 

message: I have raised a citation need against the final paragraph in the Career section:
Ron now often visits Doncaster Rovers with his grandson, Harry who are extremely good friends with shareholder and Director Dick Watson.  On 6 January is was asked at a club conference if Mr Flowers was interested in buying shares they declined to comment saying, " Ron is a supporter of the club and wants them to do well". It is rumoured that Flowers (79) is close to buying shares in the Yorkshire based club where he still has family based in Edlington.
There are some suspected typos, I am confused about the "is" who was asked if Flowers was interested in buying shares, and the age is out of date.  If it is from published information such as a newspaper report, it would be better to cite it with date to put into better context.Cloptonson (talk) 21:45, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Career - issues with paragraph

message: I would take issue with a description of Flowers as 'attacking midfield player (in modern terminology)'. He was very much a traditional wing-half - more akin to today's 'defensive midfielder' role, and later in his career moved to more of a central defender role, in much the same way as did his Wolves and England colleague Billy Wright.  His inclusion in the 1966 squad was as a central defender (covering for Brian Labone who had withdrawn from the squad for personal reasons).  The majority of his England goals (6/10 from 49) were from penalties.
Stevew2022 (talk) 22:50, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Attacking Midfielder?
Talk:Kon Kan

message: I loved the song "I Beg Your Pardon" although I don't really like any other Canadian groups.  I just bought the song from iTunes.  I hope these guys can buy a Molson with the proceeds.  Great song.
The Youtube url for the "Pardon" video is fine with me, but shouldn't it be listed as what it is?
Shouldn't this page make reference to KK's use of the KLF's "The Manual (How to Have a Number One the Easy Way)"?
:Do you have a citation to prove this? I've never heard they used The Manual. Davecool 18:24, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He may be thinking of Edelweiss. --24.185.34.96 (talk) 17:46, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: Is there anything we can reference for all the samples listed? The album notes don't include anything other than Lynn Anderson's track. Davecool 18:24, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Samples in I Beg Your Pardon

message: Smells of autobiography.
How does a band / song that most people have never heard of have so much information. Most people didn't/still dont know who Kon Kan was or is. When you are producing you might as well be dust, as no one knows who you are, or what you have done, much less to have such a large write up.Starbwoy (talk) 22:21, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Smells of autobiography advertising

message: there are voluminous unsourced claims and non notable assertions that need reliable sources for inclusion. 
please source correctly for inclusion. thanks in advance, Augmented Seventh (talk) 20:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  problematic article
Talk:Students' representative council

message: Previously this page had content based entirely on Scottish SRCs.  I have moved that to Students' Representative Council (Scotland) and included a stub in its place.  This is more appropriate if you look at what links here, many of which are international rather than Scottish articles. Zaian 21:36, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But lots of which are Scottish articles. Are you planning to go through them and change the links to the new SRC (Scotland) page? [ ;-) ] – Kieran T (talk | contribs) 22:49, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hmm, I suppose the move has just replaced one sort of untidiness with another. Sorry about that. I did think of having a single "Students' Representative Council" page with a subsection on Scotland, but that approach encourages lots of subsections and the article ends up sounding like a telephone book. Before I go and change all the links in the Scottish pages, do you have any other ideas for how to do this? Zaian 23:25, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, my first thought was to find out just how many other countries actually do call their SU/SA/student representation bodies "SRC"s. I had understood it to be a term coined by the British law referred to in the original article. However, upon Googling, I see they exist in (at least) South Africa, Australia, and Botswana. So your point about a "telephone directory" seems like a very fair one. I guess the relatively minor effort of changing the Scottish articles will resolve the untidiness. I've tried to do all the relevant ones. – Kieran T (talk | contribs) 23:53, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, thanks.  I also found a few links in England( and several others), Canada , Lesotho, and even in the US . Zaian 00:31, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Scottish page

message: This article continues to be an unsourced OR mess. I have looked for sources and whilst the 1889 formation in Scotland can be well sourced much of the rest of the article looks tough to source.
Even if the article can be sourced there would be undue weight on Scotland. The choices seem to be:
* aggressively stub leaving only the core information and the formation in Scotland. Or,
* accept the reality and move the page to Students' representative councils in Scotland.
Views, please. The Whispering Wind (talk) 14:20, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Options
Talk:Engin Ardıç

message: Does anyone have a complete list of Ardıç's works? If so, please add them at the bottom of the current stub. I have most of their names, but not all of them. I'm planning to expand and make this stub a real article in the very near future. The article will need that complete list. Thanks in advance.Smyrniot 21:44, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ardıç's Works

message: I placed a Template:POV tag in this article. Like the unsigned comment above this, I am very uncomfortable with the language of this article.  There are too many praises about Engin Ardıç in this article rather than objective and verifiable assessments.  Statements such as "his peers have been carried away by socialist currents but he succeeded in not getting carried away" are subjective judgements and personal interpretations.  Who are the peers we are talking about?  Have all of his peers been carried away or some of them?  What are socialist currents?  How do you label someone a socialist?  All of these statements sound highly political critisms about Ardıç's nameless rivals in order to praise Ardıç  himself. "He drew the ire of many secular Turkish intellectuals" is another subjective and judgemental statement.  Who are these secular intellectuals?  How do you measure their anger?  It sounds to me like a couple of people who are known for their secular views disagreed with him in the past and the author of this sentence uses highly judgemental language to create a certain bias by labeling that disagreement as "getting extremely angry".  This sort of language has no place in Wikipedia.  Let's stick to the facts, shall we? How about a biography that lists this person's places of employment, education and one that perhaps explains his political views in an objective verifiable way?
---Vikiyazar (talk)   — Preceding undated comment added 15:45, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality dispute
Talk:Richard Laymon

message: I removed Flesh as Laymon's magnum opus in the infobox.  I haven't seen a work pegged as his standout anywhere; if anything, I'd give the nod to The Cellar and its sequels.  (If it does end up being Flesh, note that flesh isn't talking about the book...) -- JHunterJ 18:47, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Magnum opus

message: Question: A number of his works are in a list titled Fastback. What in the world is a "Fastback"? 24.90.172.109 (talk) 07:33, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fastbacks?
Talk:Brookfield Place (Toronto)

message: I have incorporated the previous four articles (BCE Place, Bay Wellington Tower, Canada Trust Tower (Toronto) and TD/Canada Trust Tower) into this one article.  There was, not surprisingly, significant overlap between the information in all the articles.  As with the Commerce Court article, there is little need to have a separate article on every component of the complex.  --Skeezix1000 21:56, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Slimming down

message: BCE Place was first owned by Brookfield Developments, a subsidiary of Bell Canada Enterprises.  To finance some or all of BCE Place Construction, Brookfield issued $400 million (Canadian) dollars worth of debentures, a type of bond not legally secured by the building itself.  A substantial portion of these bonds were bought by retail investors, largely based on the widely held belief that any part of the Bell Canada Enterprises business empire would be equally honourable with respect to its debts.  
When the Toronto Real Estate market suffered a significant decline, ownership of the building was transferred from the company that issued the debentures to another corporation. The debenture-issuing BCE subsidiary, in short order, declared bankruptcy, causing great financial loss to debenture-holders.  In a media release, Brookfield explained the differences between a debenture and a mortgage bond.  Legal action, to no avail was attempted by the debenture holders.
BCE (and later, tacitly renamed Brookfield Place) experienced a multi-fold increase in market value, but no effort was ever made to compensate the original debenture holders.
Few people who walk through this beautiful building are aware that the largest commercial building was funded by unpaid loans, from retail investors, many who suffered financial calamity due to the slight-of-hand of the Bell Canada Enterprises group of companies. 177.73.101.244 (talk) 23:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy
Talk:Knowledge & Innocence

message: This is an album with a sourced commentary in a reliable source. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:32, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Birmingham toy industry

message: Matthew Boulton was certainly an important figure in the Birmingham toy industry, but I doubt that he 'dominated' it.  That is too strong a word.  There were other toy manufacturers; indeed the Birmingham jewellery industry is its lineal descendant.  Peterkingiron 21:58, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Following recent additions, which some one else trimmed as WP:COATRACK material, I have pruned off more statements about Matthew Boulton.  He was clearly a very important figure in the Birmingham toy industry, but there were many other manufacturers, of whom we know much less, some of whom became rich.  Furthermore, Wolverhampton was also involved in the toy industry.  Peterkingiron (talk) 22:51, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm "some one else".  Your edit looks good to me :) -Verdatum (talk) 17:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dominated?

message: This articelis about the Birmingham industry that produced ornamental metal objects.  This is soemthing quite different from the modern sense of "toy", that is a child's (or adult's) plaything.  There is no reason why the article should not be expanded to cover them, unless dealt with elsewhere in WP.  However, until it is, are the photos of Mamod steam engines an appropriate link for this article?  Comments please.  Peterkingiron 21:48, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on the article, certainly not.  Steam engines are complex machines and appear to be outside the scope of this industry.  So ya, I removed the link. -Verdatum (talk) 17:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toy steam engines 

message: It is worth noting that the 'Birmingham Toy' actually describes any small item manufactured in any material. To quote Showell's  Dictionary of Birmingham ... any article in any metal, leather, glass, or other materials, having the common characteristic that the patterns changed with even greater frequency than in buttons.
Additionally, Sketchley's Directory of 1767 lists 100 firms in Birmingham involved with the manufacture of toys.
GlassyEye (talk) 17:18, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Materials used 

message: The 18th century use of the term "toy" is rather different from the current one.  I wonder whehter this article needs to be renamed "Birmingham toy industry", since the article is entirely about the 18th century Birmingham industry, rahter than  the production of what we call toys today.  Toymaking and toy both redirect here, but we ought to have an article on the things children (and adults) play with: or di we under a diffenret title?  Peterkingiron (talk) 19:42, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Having had no repsonse to the above I have boldly renamed the article.  However this will not eserve as the main article for :Category:Toy industry; it never could have without great expansion, which no one has thougth fit to undertake.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:37, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible rename
Talk:Super-Soldier

message: Why exactly was this article changed so much? I thought it was fine the way it was, and much more descriptive (specifically referring to Super-Soldier's origin). Unless someone has a reason that it needed to be changed, I think it should be put back the way it was. Meweight 13:24, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Remade?

message: This article's presentation of the character's fictional publication history is horrible.  It cannot be presented as fact, as it is now.  Instead, it should describe first that the "meta-fiction" of a fictional publication history was established, what book depicts this publication history and how it depicts it.  One can't at all infer from the article how a real-life reader "learns" this backstory, and because of the confusion I can't even tell what real books this character was featured in apart from Super-Soldier #1.  The article also completely fails to describe how this parallels to the almagamated characters (i.e., that the fictional JLA #4 is derived from the real-life Avengers #4).  Postdlf 18:09, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried my hand at weeding out the fiction and adding some sources.  Let me know what you think.Konczewski (talk) 18:11, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact and fiction 

message: Shouldn't the entry really be called "Super-Soldier (Amalgam Comics)"? Roygbiv666 02:20, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it should be called "List of Amalgam Comics characters". --Chris Griswold 04:51, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming Convention

message: Due to the merge proposal Talk:List_of_Amalgam_Comics_publications#Merge Proposal this page is a redirect.--Crazy runner (talk) 15:12, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Nautonnier

message: The main article for the Priory of Sion indicates the thing is a hoax. Documentaries are out there saying Plantard was a scam artist. Where does this idea that its all well documented fact come from?
Liastnir 22:08, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. I've defused that bomb, but the article bears watching. - Nunh-huh 22:12, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Lunar Strain

message: I think Folk Metal should be added describing the sound of this album. It is pretty prevalent on some of the songs on this album (Hargalaten being the pure folk metal song). If not just the guitar work, but also the instrumentation. Anyone disagree?
: http://www.metal-observer.com/articles.php?lid=1&sid=1&id=3773
  http://www.sputnikmusic.com/album.php?albumid=5136
  http://www.metalstorm.ee/pub/review.php?review_id=107&page=&message_id=
  
On all of these reviews, they mention this album having a folk element to the songs. Anyhow, anyone thats a true fan of the band, and has heard this album will know. In Flames are not a folk metal band, but this album specifically has elements of folk music in it mixed with melodic death. I don't think anyone who's actually heard this album can dispute that. JanderVK (talk) 01:48, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Folk Metal

message: Are there ANY versions of this album that have liner art which includes lyrics, album notes, etc.?  I have the remastered edition with bonus tracks, and the liner art is quite literally a front cover, inside photo, and back cover.  Nothing else - zilch. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Theotherness (talk • contribs) 18:28, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Liner Art/Edition Question

message: Was this version issued through Regain Records remastered like the one issued in 2005 by Candlelights USA?  Dmiles21 08:44, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2003 re-release version

message: g  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.230.71.40 (talk) 09:12, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  g 
Talk:J. Rodman Williams

message: How did he die? 
Did he have a life outside of his theological studies?
Married to Jo Williams
Loved by his students because he could go from discussing the intracasies of a theological point to genuine concern about their personal issues in a heartbeat...OK that is anecdotal.. but nonetheless at least shows more life than this sterile article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.14.187.183 (talk) 22:56, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: J. Rodman Williams
Talk:Thorncrown Chapel

message: should this be a stub or not?  It seems like a fairly large article
Vesiv 22:12, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub?

message: Please upload more images to the commons, beautiful chapel.. Best regards, --CopperKettle 08:38, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: The Lead is supposed to have summary information based on the body of the article, but it has information that does not appear anywhere else. I will be editing it to reorganize this material. Parkwells (talk) 22:04, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead needs editing