lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:APS-95

message: APS-95 was only a prototype rifle. It was made only in couple of specimens by company Koncar-Arma. It was never used in Croatian army, and was never adopted or sold to any army in the world simply because it never made to serial production. It was not a licenced copy, but it was based on Galil rifle. Guns of similar apperance used by Army of Serbia and Montenegro is South-African copy of Galil rifle called R-4. Around 20.000 of those R-4 rifles were siezed by Yugoslav national army in Zagreb Pleso Airport, when Croatian businessman Antun Kikaš tried to smuggle then to Croatian police in 1991!
:I have to contradict you. According to several sources, including JANE'S, the APS-95 was indeed adopted officially by the Croatian Army but its procurement was stopped after a very limited number was acquired due to lack of fundings, which prompted Croatia to stick with the guns already available (AK-style rifles of Yugoslavian manufacture and a hodgepodge of guns acquired during the War of Independence, including FN FALs, M-16 derivatives, and even Singaporean SAR-80s), until now: they are experimenting a bull-pup locally made cross-over between the FA-MAS and the Israeli TAR-21, called the "VHS", manufactured by HS-PRODUKT, the same makers of the HS-2000 pistol (a.k.a. the Springfield XD). Koncar-Arma, the company that manufactured the APS-95 along with other military equipments (the ERO, an outright copy of the Israeli UZI; the Mini-ERO, a locally rearranged Micro-UZI with MAC-10 collapsing stock; and a 120mm self-propelled howitzer) pushed it commercially for a while showing it in several defence expo including the MILIPOL and the IDEX all along the 1990s and the 2000s, but since 2007 year their website (www.brothers-in-arms.net) suddenly disappeared from the web. I have clues to think that Koncar-Arma is still in business, so the APS-95 could be still available upon request.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheTranc (talk • contribs) 19:06, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  as seen by this photo, at least one was exported to Libya! http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/24/fighting-tripoli-gaddafi-libya
Benvenuto (talk) 04:43, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  truth about PS-95
Talk:Dick

message: Since typing in "Dicks" redirects to this page, I think that there should be a reference to Dick's Sporting Goods. But I'm not exactly sure how it should be listed since it doesn't quite fit in the list of meanings for "Dick". Personally, I don't like the name of the store (lots of bad results if you search for it), and I guess that at least having a link to the store from this page would help things out. Thunderforge 21:55, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the best answer is a "see also" to Dick's, which itself has a link to the store. Rpresser 17:12, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dick's Sporting Goods 

message: Dicks,  ending with "s," is a pen name (at least in one case), and also a surname.  Seems to be more common in England and Scotland, but there was a U.S. congressman by that name.  As mentioned above, a WP search "Dicks" brings one to this page, so Dicks should be included.
Ragityman (talk) 13:01, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surname, pen name Dicks  

message: can i edit your page because i have information about the surname dick
Captainlevi445 (talk) 16:58, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Cannolis (talk) 17:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 February 2016 

message: Dichelostemma capitatum could be added as it is known (as says on the page) as blue dicks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.115.204.102 (talk) 18:30, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  blue dicks 

message: sources for links 71.223.94.49 (talk) 09:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources link?
Talk:Green sand (casting)

message: Merge with Greensand perhaps. --Wetman 7 July 2005 06:18 (UTC)
wikipedia seems to suggest 'green sand' is a type of mineral, whereas 'green sand' is the casting sand variety. . . disambiguation? --Meawoppl 22:05, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done — Graibeard 08:23, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

message: I think the two article should be merged, they cover, more or less, the same topic.  I don't think I've heard sand called molding sand but I have heard casting sand. Iepeulas 13:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merging the two articles is not a good idea.  Green sand (foundry) is a subset of molding sand.  Molding sand can be Green sand, chemical bonded sands, unbonded sand (for example the V-Process uses molding sand with no binding agent at all) or even molding sand can be made from oil bonded sand, for example PetroBond (TM).  For this reason addditional articles could be created or else sections added to the Molding sand article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mfields1 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

text: I have merged the Green Sand into the molding sand article as green sand is a type of molding sand and there isn't enough info to justify two articles.Iepeulas (talk) 00:47, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger with [[Molding sand]]
Template talk:StarCraft series

message: We need to change this box.  How about something like this Template:Sw_jediknight_cvg? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kross (talk • contribs) 
:Yeah, this template is horribly ugly, and isnt consistent with most navigation boxes in Wikipedia. Remy B 08:07, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Should we add tools such has StarEdit and Scummedit in the template?. --SkyWalker 16:57, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starcraft Tools
Talk:Bids for the 2010 Winter Olympics

message: Please stop re-editing this page to erase Harbin's bid and imply instead that Iwata, Japan placed a bid for these Games. According to the sources cited, Iwata was never a bidder, and the Harbin was one of the 8 applicants (and the 4 non-shortlisted bidders) for these Games.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BluntDiplomat (talk • contribs) 00:27, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-existent Bid from Iwata, Japan

message: Can Smiggins Hole 2010 be mentioned if it's made clear it was not an "official" bid? (This comment was made by me in September 2005 Andjam 08:39, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Smiggins Hole 2010
Talk:The Return of the Condor Heroes

message: Can anyone confirm or debunk the rumour that Cha's original plan was to have Xiao Long Nu die, but that fans protested (some say a death threat was involved) til he had no choice but to have her "found" after 16 years?
:No, but I doubt it.  "Get the Girl" is a rather important part of the basic plot-structure of his stories... at least the ones I've read. Simonm223 (talk) 21:27, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Isn't it Eagle? I always thought it was something of a mistranslation, handed down by the wrong translation of the first one (Legend of the Eagle Shooting Hero --> Legend of the Condor Hero)Suredeath 10:10, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Condor?

message: An important part of the plot is revealed in the part of the flower of love.
Shound't it be better to hide the information that Xiaolongnü and Yang Guo jump down the cliff?
I wish I hadn't read it before I saw the series, because in my opinion, it spoiled too much of the plot.
--Johanreinink 19:15, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revealing plot 

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 17:43, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: I just think that would be much similar to "Shendiao xialyu" than "The return of the Condor Heroes", right?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.81.223.156 (talk) 09:30, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you proposing a move to the new title "Couple with Condor"? _LDS (talk) 09:56, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about "Couple with condor"? 

message: The translation on Wuxiapedia is so rough, I can't 'stand. The original Chinese version impressed me.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexander Misel (talk • contribs) 04:26, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  English Translation

message: Hi, can anyone translate :zh:神鵰俠侶 (2014年電視劇) into English?--NeoBatfreak (talk) 19:00, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  神鵰俠侶 (2014年電視劇)
Talk:The Countess of Pembroke's Arcadia

message: This simply repeats the information at Philip Sidney. --Wetman 7 July 2005 07:10 (UTC)
:Yes, I merely copied-and-pasted from Philip Sidney. I think this deserves its own page, but I don't know much about it, so I just did that and put a stub template on the bottom so hopefully someone more knowledgeble can fill in some more stuff. Poseidon^3 01:07, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicated

message: How about a plot that actually tells us something about the books content. --Knucmo2 22:43, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary
Talk:Screen-Free Week

message: "Asesores TV La Familia Internacional" -- the article says it works in many Spanish-speaking countries, but it has only 22 hits on Google, most of derived from this article. Is it spelt right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.78.160.78 (talk • contribs) 07:44, 7 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Asesores TV La Familia Internacional
Talk:Rosika Schwimmer

message: The article says she won the "World Peace Prize" in 1937. The linked page says the prize was founded in 1989. Qemist (talk) 05:32, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Peace Prize 

message: I fail to see the sense in the link about her papers when the record that comes up specifically says none of them are online.  This should be referenced in the article not as an external link.
108.45.122.74 (talk) 20:35, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  papers 

message: The free speech page does not have Schwimmer's name on it.  None of the links on that page has the title given for the link.  Where is this data now?
108.45.122.74 (talk) 20:40, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  no data on the page linked to 

message: I came across this pdf while I was looking for something else. Regular editors here may wish to look it over the biography section on page v.--Canoe1967 (talk) 00:12, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived RS 

message: , I do not have a problem with her name being shown in the traditional Hungarian style with her surname first in the lede, but do not think "Bédy-Schwimmer" should be in the lede. According to multiple references, she was known by this name for 1 year, rejected using Bédy when her marriage ended, and kept her marriage a secret for the rest of her life. If she chose to use Schwimmer as a surname, why would we list another name in the lede? Fine to show it as another name in the info box, but I cannot understand why it would have a place in the article, especially in the lede. Can you explain why you think it should be there? Thanks SusunW (talk) 00:10, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, I will solve your concern.(KIENGIR (talk) 23:10, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! SusunW (talk) 23:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her name 

message: The word "person" is awkward and inappropriate in context, unless she had a problem with people calling her short, ugly, etc. 73.71.251.64 (talk) 01:23, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: "slander against her person"
Talk:Tritone substitution

message: Tritone substitute, tritone substitution and substitute dominant all seem to describe the same thing, but using different words and illustrations.
Someone musically competent should take whatever's valuable and make one article out of it. --Alvestrand 16:57, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article mergers 

message: I have added two audio examples to the article. Hyacinth (talk) 01:29, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested audio

message: Quoting Wallace Hartley:
Clearly there's already citations requested on this page for "introducers". Just adding another one... Mark Hurd (talk) 01:29, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wallace Hartley 

message: The article as i found it suffered from off-topic and confusing "substitute dominant" content, which i've removed. (I invite further cleanup, etc.) A few main problems:
* I'm not sure about the editors who added the material, but for sure readers could be confused about the difference between "dominants" as in V chords and "dominants" as in 7 chords.
* The article is about tritone substitution, not the overlapping but separate topic of substitute dominants. Tritone subs can be for chords of any function, not just V's -- as the 12-bar example shows with the tritone sub for a tonic chord. And substitute V's don't have to be tritone subs, as the examples in the now removed "substitute dominant" section showed -- none of the three were tritone subs. These are two different topics, with "substitute dominants" deserving a separate article, perhaps mentioned here only and clearly as one common application of tritone subs.
* Whereas the article as i found it had substitute dominants the first thing defined, mixed in with the tritone sub definition as if they were synonymous, and the first section of the article.
* There was general analysis material under the ii-V-I example that i moved to analysis.
Hope this helps, "alyosha" (talk) 20:30, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  large quick-n-dirty edit: removed "substitute dominant" content 

message: Augmented Sixth chords are built on the ♭VI of the key.
The phrase “known in the classical world as an augmented sixth chord” is not correct.  The two examples under Summary are augmented sixth chords in the key of F, and neither of the examples is a perfect cadence.  The Schubert example below that does not employ an augmented sixth chord.  It is a dominant-seventh chord with a flatted fifth, in second inversion.  While its pitches are equivalent to a Fr⁶, its function is not.
Simply put, a tritone substitution (or dominant substitution) is not the same as an augmented sixth chord.
Most of the other information is quite good, and more extensive than I had anticipated.
Darsn Qeyl (talk) 21:02, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Augmented Sixth chords
Talk:Kadris

message: The statements in this article are most likely about the Qadiriyyah order. Some of the Qadiris were known to engage in self-flagellation, which early European colonial orientalists were fascinated with. Unless any has other theories, I will redirect it to the Qadiriyyah page. --Barastert 17:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redrect to Qadiriyyah
Talk:Denis Halliday

message: In 2000 Denis Halliday was jointly nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize with Kathy Kelly of Voices in the Wilderness, the campaign against sanctions on Iraq.
*Being nominated for the Peace Prize is an honor, but it is not official and not necessarily prestigious. Any national legislator or about a third of the university professors in the world can make a nomination, and there have been as many as 160 some years. Rumored nominees have included a Brazilian psychic (nominated twice) and an unscrupulous businessmen from Ohio.  Nominators are requested to keep their nominations secret, so it's only those wishing publicity who make announcements. In most instances the reports of prize nominations seem to just be unattributed rumors. Altogether, I see no reason to keep it as is. I propose changing it to "was recognized". No offense to the subject, this is a general Nobel Peace Prize "nominees" issue. -Willmcw July 7, 2005 08:12 (UTC)
::Adolf Hitler anyone? Someone emphasized he was a critic of the Versailles-Treaty, and that would earn him the Nobel Prize.....--Stat-ist-ikk (talk) 11:59, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wow, comparing Halliday to Hitler...that's a good one--88.130.22.219 (talk) 14:23, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Nobel Peace Prize
Talk:1969: The Velvet Underground Live

message: Musically, 1969 finds the band in top form. Doug Yule, John Cale's late-1968 replacement, fits well into the band and performances are tight. Highlights are Reed and Morrison's interwoven rhythm guitar play and Yule's organ parts on "What Goes On" and "Ocean".
To me this sounds very point of view-ish, and should perhaps be deleted, as it makes it sound more like an album review. Does anyone have any objections?
222.153.4.159 (talk) 09:42, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Unless the description can be attributed to a music critic, I think it should be deleted. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 21:27, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review?

message: The complaint that there was no audience mic misses the point that these recordings catch the band in a relaxed and natural attitude. The songs come across as they were meant to, neither with the overamped intensity of White Light, nor with a self-consciously laid back quality as a reaction against White Light that the Velvet Underground album was. To me this is the natural follow-up to VU & Nico. Yes, the feeling is 'Live in the Studio' rather that live at a venue, but that is my favorite kind of album, just capture what they play on four-track tape and leave the mix-down to two-track stereo as simple as possible. Their debut album was unselfconscious, they just played what they where currently playing live just they way they normally did without anybody to tell them what they had to do to sell themselves. Yes, they cleaned it up for the studio and were very careful to get the perfect take, but it was their take on the songs, no one else's. This album was like that.
Now that I mention it, it was Andy Warhol who supplied the artistic freedom according to his own ethos. It would be interesting to study how his theories helped to produce the first album even though he did not really produce it.
Stephen  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.93.176 (talk) 14:11, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second favorite album  --  flat? 

message: "There is little ambiance or audience sound, however, because no audience mic was used and so the only ambience the listener gets is whatever little the vocal and drums mics picked up."
This is not a necessary practice of recording musicians, to also record the audience.  Ambiance?  This album has great ambiance in my opinion, but that is POV, so I wouldn't expect it to be part of this encyclopedia entry.
"This makes the record sound relatively flat and small and makes it seem that only a handful of people were present."
This is definitely point of view, and prejudices new listeners to the album, and not worthy of an encyclopedia article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Antilog (talk • contribs) 14:10, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV
Talk:Kid Pix

message: Please ask more people to contribute to this article.
Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:56, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please more support 

message: I loved this application in school and it was heavily used throughout my computer classes in the early 2000's. This article is flagged to need extreme help. Any other Kid Pix users want to help contribute to fixing and improving this article? Carolinedonohue3 (talk) 21:25, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kid Pix
Talk:Criticisms of Jacques Lacan

message: This is not an encyclopaedic article about Chomsky's criticism of Lacan, and it utilizes POV in several instances.  In all frankness, it is more of a response to Chomsky than a summary of his critique.  I do not think this should be included in this article in its current form.
: I agree. I would also submit that the "conclusion" is heavily POV. According to my POV, a misguided POV at that. --s
: I would also like to state my agreement with the original posting, and with s' addition.  Furthermore, it seems that the conclusion is at least partyly unrelated to the encyclopedia topic being dicussed
In agreement with the above statements I have just removed "The case of Chomsky", which I thought was a nice essay, but besides the point for Wikipedia. I have summarized its main points and included in them in the article, which I also structured somewhat. I also added a "see also" section. bastel 19:36, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding "The case of Chomsky"
Template talk:Indonesia-stub

message: Please restore the image size to that recommended by WP:Stub sorting, to the old value of 40px, instead of the current value of 90px. -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 04:31, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Never seen any other image to restore. Mdann52 (talk) 10:44, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Editsemiprotected
Talk:Little Annie Rooney

message: " Although the King Features strip was an obvious knock-off with several similar parallels, the approach was quite different,". OK, shouldn't the article go on to state in what way(s) it was different?  Like "Little Annie Rooney didn't have blank eyes" (I'm just guessing here) PatConolly (talk) 00:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quite different ?
Talk:Jamiroquai

message: Hey, I thought it would make sense to include the Jamiroquai logo and the Buffalo man because you know, Jamiroquai wouldn't be Jamiroquai without their branding HoovyRoovy (talk) 22:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jamiroquai's Logo 

message: https://pitchfork.com/news/eagles-dethrone-michael-jacksons-thriller-for-best-selling-album-of-all-time/
https://ew.com/music/2018/08/20/eagles-best-selling-album-all-time/
Note the aforementioned examples. "Third best-selling" implies it was the third album to be a "best-selling album", which is obviously not what this phrase is saying. It's subtle but important. Please don't revert this change. Electricmaster (talk) 15:58, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "third-best-selling" should have two hyphens 

message: Jamiroquai's music has been used in quite a few TV shows and movies (not to mention countless pop culture references); would it be worth mentioning some of their most prominent appearances? Electricmaster (talk) 11:31, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really. The mention of Napoleon Dynamite was there but I was told by a reviewer to take it out. I feel like when it comes to songs used, they maybe can be mentioned the songs' own articles if notable enough. Otherwise if every appearance was mentioned, it would bog down the article too much.웃OO 04:11, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good response. I agree. Electricmaster (talk) 02:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use in movies and TV 

message: I've added a timeline for the core band members (long overdue, really). I have currently omitted Wallis Buchanan (digeridoo), DJ D-Zire, and Howard Whiddett (Ableton Live). There's probably an argument to be made for their (or potentially others') inclusion. Please discuss. Electricmaster (talk) 02:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't want to say that this is a bad idea because it's not. But the only issue that lies is how some of the members would need high-quality and reliable sourcing for their individual timelines, otherwise it could constitute as WP:Original Research. I was unable find them for some of the members hence why I omitted the member timeline. 웃OO 05:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Member Timeline