Talk:Auditory hallucination

message: Soliloquy I think in English.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.167.239.229 (talk) 10:32, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internal Monologue or when used in theater: Soliloquy 

message: I thought I'd put this here, just to see what kind of feedback I might get regarding the very strong possibility of this:
Since the brain mechanisms responsible for conscience, will to live, behavior control, etc. can be starved of oxygen by an increase in serotonin levels (From the Merriam-Webster: Serotonin:  a phenolic amine neurotransmitter C10H12N2O that is a POWERFUL VASOCONSTRICTOR and is found especially in the brain, blood serum, and gastric mucous membrane of mammals), isn't it also possible that if these brain mechanisms are inhibited in this manner, a person in this state may simply NOT RECOGNIZE their own thoughts, and attribute this altered version of them to being "voices" other than their own?
I believe this may be a dynamic of the effects of antidepressant medication in some people.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.123.149.124 (talk) 23:15, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi 208.123.149.124! Wikipedia is not the right place for innovative thoughts. We describe accepted knowledge. The talk page is for discussing the article, not for discussing the subject of the article. I'm sure there are other places on the internet where you can discuss your ideas. With friendly regards, Lova Falk talk 08:03, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Novel Concept 

message: I inserted a link to a wikipedia article called Talking tree and it was removed on the claim it has no relevance. In my opinion the past history of mankinds documented "hearing voices" is relevant. Today hearing voices is viewed as an illness, when in the past it was not as one.--Mark v1.0 (talk) 15:49, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That viwes on auditory hallucinations have changed over time is true, and should be introduced into this article as sourced content if suitable sources can be found. The talking tree article is about fictional talking trees and is not relevant to that historical truth or this article. Link removed. GDallimore (Talk) 20:48, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am surprised at how literal you are GDallimore. As you must know trees do not talk, so these multitude of historical references to talking trees has to be an "auditory hallucination".--Mark v1.0 (talk) 11:58, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: What references? There are none in the talking tree article suggesting that they are anything other than a fictional construct or allegory. GDallimore (Talk) 16:50, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of link to  Talking tree

message: It should be noted and with respect for the medical community, there are existing articles on Wikipedia which may help explain this medical phenomena. As a peer, this article could articulate more clearly the difference between non-medical (reasoning, cognition, etc.) and medical situations. A standard measuring system or data table would improve the article greatly. Also, a more detailed examination of treatment options within the medical community could be noted (specific medicines, surgical procedures, etc.). Below are links to articles that contribute directly to the argument of if this condition is a legitimate treatable condition or if it is a medical tort.
*Occupational Safety and Health Act (United States): Represents workers rights and occupational safety standards. 
*Transparency (behavior): Establishes the bridgework between social and consumer relations
*Administration: The standing definition of normalcy and management.
*UL (safety organization): A global safety assurance and standards organization.
*Risk management: A universal insurance principle of inclusion by corporate responsibility.
*Breach of confidence: (see also; Securities exchange In tort law, the instance of disclosing confidential and trade secrets, usually for profit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Habatchii (talk • contribs) 16:18, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Article Request (Question of Ethics) 

message: Although this is said 
:Differentiating actual auditory hallucinations from a normal internal dialogue is important since the latter phenomena are not indicative of mental illness 
in the article (more than once); you might want to emphasise it (i) earlier in the intro, and (ii) in the Schumann paragraph. 
MBG02 (talk) 05:37, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who said that? 

message: Hello all, I am planning to add a new section to the page either right after "History" or after "Potential causes". Let me know if you have any feedback on this idea. I plan on adding this new section in the next couple of hours. Thank you!
These are the sources I will be citing: 
1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and 
statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
2. Bauer, S. M., Schanda, H., Karakula, H., Olajossy-Hilkesberger, L., Rudaleviciene, P., Okribelashvili, N., . . . Stompe, T. (2011). Culture and the prevalence of hallucinations in schizophrenia. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 52(3), 319-325. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2010.06.008
3. Beavan, V., Read, J., & Cartwright, C. (2011). The prevalence of voice-hearers in the general population: A literature review. Journal of Mental Health, 20(3), 281-292. doi:10.3109/09638237.2011.562262
4. Luhrmann, T. M., Padmavati, R., Tharoor, H., & Osei, A. (2015). Hearing Voices in Different Cultures: A Social Kindling Hypothesis. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7(4), 646-663. doi:10.1111/tops.12158
5. Taitimu, M., Read, J., & McIntosh, T. (2018). Ngā Whakāwhitinga (standing at the crossroads): How Māori understand what Western psychiatry calls “schizophrenia”. Transcultural Psychiatry,55(2), 153-177. doi:10.1177/1363461518757800
ColorfulSocialJusticeHummingbird (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 06:02, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed New Section: Cross-Cultural Understandings of Auditory Hallucinations 

message: Hello all, I'm a college student studying psychology at LSE. I have an assignment to make a contribution to Wikipedia this term. I'm thinking about adding a new section talking about aduible thoughts under this entry. Audible thoughts is a kind of auditory verbal hallucination that wasn't described in detail in this page, I think adding it to this page would help the readers understand more about auditory hallucination. If you have any concern about my proposal please let me know.
I'll list my sources below:
1.Mellor, C. S. (1970). First rank symptoms of schizophrenia: I. the frequency in schizophrenics on admission to hospital II. Differences between individual first rank symptoms. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 117(536), 15-23.
2.Humpston, C. S., & Broome, M. R. (2016). The spectra of soundless voices and audible thoughts: Towards an integrative model of auditory verbal hallucinations and thought insertion. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 7(3), 611-629.
3.Nayani, T. H., & David, A. S. (1996). The auditory hallucination: a phenomenological survey. Psychological medicine, 26(1), 177-189.
4.Kaufmann, C., Agalawatta, N., Masson, M., & Malhi, G. S. (2017). Phenomenal Insights: Extraordinary auditory hallucinations–Thought sonorisation. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 51(5), 538-539.
--Scott Sun1 (talk) 16:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thinking about adding a new section: Audible thoughts 

message: In the book Hallucinations by the neurologist Oliver Sacks he mentions that most people have Auditory hallucinations at some point in their life. He also mentions that people with Auditory hallucinations are often wrongly identified as people suffering from Schizophrenia, even though the vast majority of people with Auditory hallucinations don't have Schizophrenia. It is true and mention it that most people with Schizophrenia do have Auditory hallucination.
I think it is important to mention it, due to the wrong stigma that people have regarding Auditory hallucination. and also the very common misconception that auditory hallucination is almost always psychotic (which is not true).
:As far as I see the article doesn't claim that auditory hallucination = schizophrenia, I see plenty of non-schizophrenia causes mentioned. What exactly do you want changed?--Megaman en m (talk) 15:23, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auditory hallucination doesn't necessarily mean Schizophrenia