Talk:No-fly zone

message: To operate aircraft inside an AEZ, an operator must defeat the air defences. Common strategies involve avoiding detection, defeating the weapons used to enforce said AEZ or direct violence against said AA capabilities. The blanket term for this is SEAD, suppression of air defences. Therefore a link to the wiki entry on SEAD was added to "See Also".Student342 (talk) 15:21, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: See Also; SEAD

message: I removed the following question from the end of the paragraph on the Iraq No-Fly Zone, "Does this case represent a victory for the Realist or Solidarist perspectives on Humanitarian Intervention?" It seems strangely out of context and makes me wonder if this text was lifted (rightfully or not) from a textbook. Any thoughts? - editoro
:I agree with the removal. -Snpoj 05:00, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of question at end of Iraq paragraph. 

message: This article needs to include the purpose of a no-fly zone.  I am not well-versed in the subject.  Anyone? KevinPuj 15:39, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purpose? 

message: I'm not disputing that this is a "no-fly zone", but I'm curious for the reason. Most of the other listed areas within the US have obvious strategic value, or are otherwise explained (as in the case of the museum.) 
Is this area a no-fly zone for preserving the "wilderness experience", or is there some other reason? (Either way, I feel it should be mentioned in the article.) 
--WanderingHermit 21:07, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boundary Waters -- Reason? 

message: Please refer to http://www.cnn.com/2003/TRAVEL/03/18/airspace.restrictions/ and edit information accordingly... 202.163.253.91 07:07, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add/edit to include info 

message: Isn't there a film called No Fly Zone? Daniel Christensen (talk) 17:16, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Film

message: That looks a bit out of place in this article. Prohibited, restricted, and danger areas (and TFR, also known as Temporarily Restricted Areas elsewhere) are regular features of the airspace of every ICAO member country, and fundamentally different from a military no-fly zone which appears to be the subject of this article.
I suggest that part should go, least one starts listing the Prohibited Areas appearing in every country's AIP.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.27.130.200 (talk) 01:47, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I second that, we had a similar discussion over at :de:Talk:Flugverbotszone during the last few days. I propose: 1) enhancing the introduction to contain some kind of explanation and links to prohibited airspace and restricted airspace (or Special use airspace). 2) kicking out everything that is not a NFZ. That would be nearly anything from the section No-fly zones as of March 2011, since most of the areas mentioned there were put up by the ICAO member countries themselves and are therefore either prohibited or restricted airspaces. Greetings, --El Grafo (talk) 09:00, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Much better now, thanks! --El Grafo (talk) 11:22, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Section - Prohibited Areas and TFRs 

message: There seems to be no mention of the recent NASA recommendations for no-fly zones over the moon. I know that it is not legally binding on anyone, but it does deserves a mention in this article.
See :  --Siddhant (talk) 17:08, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moon no-fly zone 

message: Is Syria a no-fly zone or not? I was doubting since I flew with Emirates from Germany to Dubai. The airplane was projected to go over Syria, but he clearly avoided by flying over Turkey and Iraq. Since Syria is in civil war and a military airplane from Turkey probably was shot down, I became more uncertain. OPolkruikenz (talk) June 23, 2012 13:16 (UTC)
: I think it would be useful to start a new section on the requested and discussed plans for a no-fly zone on some areas in Syria. Tradedia (talk) 17:36, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Syria

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on No-fly zone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150320181448/http://airpower.airforce.gov.au/Publications/List/35/Conference-Proceedings.aspx?page=2 to http://airpower.airforce.gov.au/Publications/List/35/Conference-Proceedings.aspx?page=2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on No-fly zone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071114173549/http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=3106 to http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=3106
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050209080929/http://www.emergency.com/2ndcruse.htm to http://www.emergency.com/2ndcruse.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: They're not really 'no-fly zones' are they? They're just airspaces made restricted temporarily. There's thousands of restricted airspaces around the world, mostly above military locations, and they're not talked about here as 'no-fly zones' because they're not. The Nevada Test and Training Range would be a good example of a quite extensive restricted airspace that isn't described as a no-fly zone. I suggest that the civilian examples be removed and a link to Prohibited airspace be included in the 'see also' section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.173.197.120 (talk) 13:34, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. There should be some sentences in the introductory paragraph that explain the difference between a no-fly-zone and prohibited / restricted airspace. Then there's also TFR, but that seems to be a national US thing only. --El Grafo (talk) 14:32, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civilian examples 

message: I'm trying to figure out how to word an addition about Zelenskyy's current request for an NFZ in Ukraine.  At first I was going to just cite some news sources, but then it occurred to me that the news articles aren't clear exactly what is being requested, and I'm not even sure Zelenskyy knows what he is asking for.  It seems like a weird request since what he really seems to want is air defense upgrades against attacking Russian planes.  NFZ according to the article is, by contrast, something an attacker does to suppress the defender's air power, while allowing their own planes to operate.  As I understand it, imposing an NFZ begins with bombing the air defense system, rather than upgrading it.   I may be wrong, and in any case I think this addition will need specialized sourcing rather than general news articles.   So I think I want to leave this to the military experts here.  But I think an addition is worth having.  2601:648:8202:350:0:0:0:C115 (talk) 21:36, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There are plenty of sources about Zelensky asking for NFZ, with NATO refusing because an NFZ would likely enlarge the conflict.  The issue is explaining the refusal a bit more clearly.  That will in turn require explaining how an NFZ is implemented, and I'm sure there are sources for that, but it's not my area.  So I'd rather that knowledgeable editors take care of it, or at least supply (pardon the expression) guidance.  2601:648:8202:350:0:0:0:C115 (talk) 03:04, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ukraine invasion