lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Garrett Tierney

message: This article is horribly written. Should either be cleaned up, deleted, or merged with the Brand New article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheSuperBrickDude (talk • contribs) 21:11, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up, merged, or deleted. 

message: I think that this is probably one of the shittiest articles ive ever seen.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.141.184.66 (talk) 05:24, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: sucks
Talk:Hamilton Hall (Columbia University)

message: maybe add that Hamilton houses the Center on the Study of Racer and Ethnicity, the Office of Admissions and the Dean's Office?
*Source of the faculty-watching-students-from-the-roof-of-butler tradition? Absentminded (talk) 22:59, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: See title - is there a way to make it English? Birdplane (talk) 05:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this issue is related to a bug in OpenStreetMap. See Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive_212#Serbian_place_names_displayed_on_Manhattan_maps for more details. Transpoman (talk) 20:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the map in Serbo-Croatian? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Snow closing this move request - no evidence or strong argument that this is a WP:COMMONNAME for the building. - Fuzheado | Talk 11:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hamilton Hall (Columbia University) →  – As detailed in the article, Columbia protestors unfurled a banner identifying the building as Hind's Hall, a name that has largely caught on in the public space. In recent times, the building is far more widely known as Hind's Hall than as Hamilton Hall. At the very least a redirect should be added, if not a direct move. Amyipdev (talk) 16:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 May 2024
Talk:500 West Jefferson

message: The building changed ownership in 2020 and is no longer known as PNC Plaza but as 500 West Jefferson or 500W. Iheartbairdlou (talk) 21:09, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do I rename the article? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to 500 West Jefferson. Per consensus.  – robertsky (talk) 14:04, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: PNC Plaza → 
– Hello, just wanted to make a thread asking to move/change the name of the title PNC Plaza to 500W. After the building was brought by Someraroad, the name of the building changed to 500W. It gets confusing for tenants searching up 500W and seeing it is still PNC Plaza. I attached some article showcasing the change in name. Let me know if you need anything else, thanks.
Here is a article link [1]https://www.wdrb.com/in-depth/new-owner-plans-to-change-the-trajectory-of-aging-louisville-office-tower/article_6f5d1f7a-b4ed-11eb-a1f1-93d90b5cacc0.html Let me know if this works. Here is another link where the building itself is just being referred to as 500W. [2]https://www.bizjournals.com/louisville/news/2021/12/22/construction-begins-on-downtown-tower-renovation.html Rliu5875 (talk) 16:13, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: — Rliu5875 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 03:37, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: —  is an intern at Someraroad, the owner of 500 West Jefferson (this article's topic) per this posting -- 64.229.90.172 (talk) 03:28, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the correct link is this one. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 03:37, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

text: <Small>—  and  are the same person, according to a message chain left at user talk:Rliu5875 in a post by Rliu5875   -- 64.229.90.172 (talk) </small>
*Oppose. Reads like the title is about 500 watts. Steel1943 (talk) 19:40, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: — 38.104.201.186 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 03:37, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The IP is same as . See disclosure. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 09:13, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move PNC Plaza to 500W
Talk:Blank Park Zoo

message: What would be the best way to format the various exhibits within the Discovery Center?  The way it is now looks a bit confusing even to me. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.Dolph72 16:24, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Exhibit section

message: This article is full of information that will be constantly changing (not encyclopedic -- see WP:Encyclopedic) and will be different just about every time someone goes to verify it. This information belongs on the Website (which we point to) and really should stay there (WP is not a travel guide or a schedule for a local institution). For instance, you can't possibly have a complete animal list that stays up to date (animals come and go all the time at any zoo), and a list of special events with actual dates is guaranteed to be out of date practically before the ink dries. Animal lists should be limited to the major animals (think "animals that are identified on the zoo map") and special events to those that are annual (and for which we do not include actual dates). Don Lammers (talk) 00:36, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Tourist information
Talk:Bibi Besch

message: Besch was not the actress' true surname. That was her stepfather's surname, which she  adopted. I don't know if Huber was her mother's maiden name or married name, or if that was Bibi Besch's real surname. If anyone knows, please update (preferably with  sourcing). Thanks. Quis separabit? 22:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. Quis separabit? 15:05, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthname

message: Face it guys, it's never going to be updated. Drop the pedantic tagging and accept wikipedia is never going to achieve the quality it arrogantly assumes it will. All these tags on articles, especially 4 year old tags make the whole site look like the joke it actually is. 86.141.254.165 (talk) 21:21, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:NOTFINISHED, WP:DEADLINE. "Nature does not hurry, yet everything is accomplished." - Lao Tzu Ginsuloft (talk) 21:48, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagged for 4 Years?

message: I know that originally 1942 was the year of birth then somehow it was determined she was born in 1940. I went with it until I found out her elder sister was born in August 1939, less than six months before Bibi's birth, just like the Hal LeSueur/Joan Crawford conundrum (see Crawford talk page for more details). Also, travel manifests and other ancestry.com records indicate she was born in 1942 and there would be no reason for her parents to lie about her age. I therefore submit respectfully, based on the essential biological impossibility that Bibi was born five months after her elder sister, that 1942 was, in fact, Bibi's correct year of birth. Quis separabit? 02:53, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of birth

message: She never won at the Emmys.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.87.236.202 (talk) 18:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emmy Award 
Talk:South El Monte, California

message: Isn't South El monte a incorporate city, or unincorporate communuity like South San Gabriel in Rosemead? I know certainly South Pasadena is a incorporate city. I have people telling me South El Monte is not a city.--Freewayguy Msg USC 02:43, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  City incorporate?
Talk:The Bonesetter's Daughter

message: I read the book soon after it was published.  At that time it was called "The Bonecutter's Daughter", because the father had found a dragon's bone, and sold slivers of the bone as some kind of :TCM.  For some reason, the book's name changed to Bonecutter. 95.144.182.129 (talk) 12:38, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of this book
Talk:Sydney J. Harris

message: Hi,
I'm new at this so forgive any protocol mistakes.
I think Sydney Harris'famous columns entitled:  “Things I learned en route to looking up other things.” should be listed on his wiki site. They are quite famous and mentioned in several places on the web so I think it should be on his wiki bio.
This method of learning even affected the culture, as whenever someone learns something fabulous while looking for something else, it reminds them of his columns.  (If old enough to remember the 1980s.)
One source is:  http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-3797728.html
I also found one blog that plagiarized the phrase right down to the "en route".
Also, when searching on Sidney Harris the user should be provided a link to the bio webpage since they probably just spelled Sydney wrong.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sydney_Harris
Takes me to the bio
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidney_Harris
Takes me to
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Sidney Harris can refer to:
a science cartoonist. 
a character in the Honorverse. 
but it does not mention a columnist who wrote for the Chicago Sun Times.
Junedunne 22:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two things:  Add reference to famous articles and add link if name is misspelled 

message: I am moving this essay into the discussion, because although it is certainly worthy of inclusion (somewhere), I don't think it belongs in the actual biographical entry on Sydney Harris. Dibowen5 18:35, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving "How We Can Master Our Technology"
Talk:Bibliotheca Philosophica Hermetica

message: VALID QUESTIONS:
"Ritman spend so much money aquiring the books that he got into financial problems"  "and had to sell them off. Part of the collection was sold by the bank and a third of it was bought by the Dutch state." 
Answer No.1: Ritman was never peniless. He borrowed heavilly from the ING bank and it foreclosed all of a sudden. There is not a stain on his caracter and he has since been decorated with the" Order of the Dutch Lion". The art collection (Etches, rugs, jugendstil jewellery) was sold, the most precious books were brought to the vault of a London auctioneer. But Ritman won! After the sale of his company he received 60 million Euro and ALL 20 000 books. One third of this collection was bought by the state for 18.7 million Euro.
It seems my first source was not reliable. I will correct my mistakes!
Robert Prummel 01:55, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There seems to be a change, someone in Holland should investigate and document it if true. Please see this article: http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2010/12/unique_rare_esoteric_book_coll.php
109.105.225.22 (talk) 17:36, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The library was recently reopened and they have a new website up with all the details.  Made some edits to reflect. Car Henkel (talk) 02:22, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Relocation of some of the books to The Hague
Talk:Jean-Pierre Duport

message: Dedicatee of the opus 5 set of Beethoven cello sonatas.  See this link.(Also, was it he or his brother who was the author of the Duport theme in Mozart's piano variations?) If it came to a vote I would say notable... Schissel | Sound the Note! 01:56, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That source says opus 5 was dedicated to Friedrich Wilhelm II. Rutsq (talk) 05:43, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hurricane Karen (2001)

message: This is definetly a B-class article, and probably pass through GAnom. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 19:43, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Congratulations on this articles promotion. Next might I suggest a Wikiproject assesment to see how it may be brought up to A-class and after a peer review? --Tarret 21:12, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Passed

message: I think it is at A-class now. Any agreement? CrazyC83 02:19, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reassessment

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 21:43, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Pass
Talk:Jonas Snäckmark

message: "When Kishti Tomita commented on his "beautiful" kilt, Jonas pulled up his kilt, almost revealing the contents."
He only showed a bit more of one of his legs but at the same time pressed the kilt against the leg so that nothing else but his leg was shown. That is not the impression that the above sentence gives. Therefore i'm removing the sentence as is.
BMW Z3 00:05, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind :), you've made a good work with the articles! I don't have time really but i've already covered Sanna, Mogge, Breitholtz, and Jonas. BMW Z3 16:29, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kilt 

message: I'm sorry for whatever I might caused. Never mind... I managed to create a template of all the Contestants and put it under every article. So far: Jonas, Linda and Felicia. Maybe you might wanna help me contribute?
Yours, nv02migu 14:24, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind :), you've made a good work with the articles! I don't have time really but i've already covered Sanna, Mogge, Breitholtz, and Jonas. BMW Z3 16:29, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Kilt
Talk:Built to Kill, Part 2

message: Hey! Isn't Danny Bonaduce in this episode?! I saw it! Chef Clover 14:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind. Chef Clover 14:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waitaminute! 
Talk:Flying Saucer Working Party

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.nickpope.net/ufos_an_official_history.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:03, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Estimate of the Situation

message: Sword’s opinion that “Ruppelt's published account of the material contained in the ‘’Estimate of the Situation’’ left out significant documentation proving that UFOs were of extraterrestrial origin” would mean US Air Force censorship of the book, is off-base. There is no proof of that. Nobody knows why Ruppelt did so. 
What we do know is that he posed the question, “What constitutes proof?”:
*The hassle over the word “proof” boils down to one question: What constitutes proof? Does a UFO have to land at the River Entrance to the Pentagon, near the Joint Chiefs of Staff offices? Or is it proof when a ground radar station detects a UFO, sends a jet to intercept it, the jet pilot sees it, and locks on with his radar, only to have the UFO streak away at a phenomenal speed? Is it proof when a jet pilot fires at a UFO and sticks to his story even under the threat of court-martial? Does this constitute proof? The at times hotly debated answer to this question may be the answer to the question, “Do the UFOs really exist?” I’ll give you the facts - all of the facts - you decide.
So he was not going to “prove” the UFOs to be of extraterrestrial origin. He even left it to the reader to decide whether the UFOs really existed or not, which question has to be answered ‘’before’’ any discussion of their origin. Ruppelt obviously tried to not take sides. ‘’This’’ cautious approach may much more have been the real reason why he left out the material that ‘’Sign’’ thought to be “proof” of the interplanetary origin of the UFOs. Maybe he had other reasons, for instance, that the material seems to be too hot in his opinion. We do not know. It is quite unnecessary to speculate about US Air Force censoring interference, and more so since Ruppelt was a “whistleblower”. The Air Force would have done everything to prevent the book from being published, they would with certainty not have “cleared” it, to be sure.
Swords speculation makes no sense, at least in the form Hoyt quotes it, and the alleged “clearance” is off-base. This paragraph should therefore, in my opinion, not be included in the article.7bells (talk) 00:23, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There were a couple of newspaper articles from around that time that were 'approved' by the Air Force as part of an initiative to be more open with the general public but alas I can't find anything about a book being approved. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:03, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Ruppelt’s 1956 book cleared by USAF?

message: As I see it an Estimate of the Situation is not just something that applied to one UFO conspiracy theory. Nor do I think that anyone would associate it with UFO's outside the field of UFOlogy.Slatersteven (talk) 12:17, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirection
Talk:Nibiru cataclysm

message: I have removed the parenthetical clause "a physical pole shift..." because I read the underlying linked source and she does not state this.Wjhonson (talk) 19:03, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pole Shift 

message: according to the bbc there is a hidden planet in the solar system, the section on conspiracy theory needs to be removed in light of this new information.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/66727365 82.9.56.21 (talk) 20:15, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Planet Nine has nothing to do with the Nibiru rubbish. Planet Nine would not get closer than  from the Sun (about 7x farther than Neptune and 4x farther than Pluto at Pluto's farthest distance from the Sun). -- Kheider (talk) 20:23, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bbc article
Talk:Seoul Korea Temple

message: I am placing this article in the :Category:Places of worship in South Korea, but it does look rather odd there without a modifier in the title, as there are Buddhist temples in South Korea. Maybe this article should be moved to "Seoul Korea Temple of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints". Just a thought Isaac Crumm 02:16, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Template talk:Update

message: Hi, what is the protocol or etiquette regarding removing an update template after updating the information? It might be good to include this information in the template itself. 20WattSphere (talk) 00:06, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I personally agree with the above.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  07:30, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal protocol 

message: I note that the images used in this template do not have a link. However, they do not have alt= set to mark them as purely decorative, which is an accessibility issue.
Please make the following change to the template: diff —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 20:16, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: * Pppery * it has begun... 20:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix accessibility 

message: Add a "subsection" param, similar to "section" param. Qwerty284651 (talk) 14:54, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: please sync, then make your edit in the sandbox and verify it is working; when ready reactivate the edit request above. — xaosflux Talk 15:28, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Just use  - I consider that the distinction between sections (level 2 headings) and subsections (levels 3 through 6) is not great enough to warrant extra code. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:16, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 14 February 2023 

message: Please update this covid 19 template page as I need it for my course deadline. 2607:FEA8:9DD:B900:B4FF:E327:B111:F9EE (talk) 20:31, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update please 

message: If you visit Template:Update/testcases and search for "those related to section", you'll see some templates that are using bad grammar. I suggest changing that to "those related to this section", or removing that entirely. Would do it myself but is a bit complicated because the same code is also used to generate "those related to documentation", which is correct grammar and doesn't necessarily need to be modified. Thanks. –Novem Linguae (talk) 07:45, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "those related to section"
Talk:Epson Tour

message: An anonymous added the word Duramed sporadically before FUTURES Tour in this article.  I suggest if we do that, we be sure to do it only for references to Tour events from 2006 or later.  The FUTURES Tour prior to 2006 was not the Duramed FUTURES Tour. Crunch 02:26, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of Duramed in article
Talk:Biuret test

message: There should be a chemical explanation to this reaction. For example the peptide link is broken etc etc.
194.204.110.244 07:47, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Untitled] 

message: Add soduim hydroxide solution followed by weak copper sulphate solution.if the pale blue colour goes purple there's protein in it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.99.56.215 (talk) 17:00, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Buiret Test For Protein 

message: Hi, 
I added an image depicting the Biuret complex taken from the Japanese wikipedia. Now however I see that there are more structural diagrams out there, inculding these two: 
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Biuretcomplex.png and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Biuret_Test.svg
I am not quite sure if the one I used is the right one. Out of these only Biuret_Test.svg seems to have a source (albeit German)
Which one do you think we should choose?
Cheers
--Glutanimate  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glutanimate (talk • contribs) 18:55, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structural formula of the biuret complex