lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ethanol metabolism

message: Needs to include the role of CYP450 proteins (esp CYP2E1) in the ethanol - acetaldehyde reaction.  This is very relevant to anyone more interested in clinical significant over organic chemistry  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.162.182.183 (talk) 18:20, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Omissions 

message: Somebody needs to translate this into English. It's the worst article on Wiki I've ever read.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.104.48.201 (talk) 19:58, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to me that this is a copy of a lab report. 71.167.118.89 (talk) 12:36, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Yeah, this is honestly really poorly written (in the sense of organization and Wikipedia). I'm going to mark this for later review so I can maybe make some sense of this. Slavakion (talk) 03:01, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing Style 

message: This article at least seems to be fairly well cited. Do we really need that tag? What exactly is the information in question? Andrew Nutter  Talk | Contribs  15:47, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References & Original Research 

message: Ethanol doesn't even get used in glycolysis ... the whole glycolysis map is really misleading because the conversion of acetic acid into acetyl-CoA is an aerobic step, not an anaerobic one. I suggest we remove it and replace it with a simpler schema. It doesn't add anything that we don't already know through the "thermodynamic considerations" section. John Riemann Soong (talk) 14:08, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  glycolysis map 

message: a section is needed on excretion. i.e., proportion excreted by the kidneys unchanged, as acetaldehyde, etc.Toyokuni3 (talk) 15:17, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Excretion

message: Is there a way to test someone to see if they have the enzyme or not?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.147.236.194 (talk) 16:06, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Way to test for enzyme? 

message: Step 3 is missing in the energy calculation section. I do not know enough about wikipedia formatting or biochemistry to fix it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.187.251 (talk) 06:32, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Energy Calculations 

message: Most of the −1325.6 kJ/mol calculated here will be turned into heat. Wouldn't it be more useful to list the biologically available energy produced per ethanol?
Step  	NADH	FADH2	ATP/GTP
Step 1	+1  	0    	0
Step 2	+1  	0    	0
Step 3	0   	0    	-1
CAC   	+3  	+1   	+1
Total 	+5  	+1   	0
Given that NADH oxidation in the ETC cycle produces ~2.5ATP/NADH and ~1.5ATP/FADH2, this makes ~15 ATP available per ethanol. In comparison, glycolysis produces ~32 ATP/glucose.
--Quantum7 13:25, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biologically accessible energy
Talk:Vickers Tank Periscope MK.IV

message: Please move the article to Gundlach periscope, as this is the real name of the instrument.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.36.174.230 (talk) 15:03, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Was it ever called the Gundlach periscope? I can see an argument for having a redirect from Gundlach Peryskop obrotowy and using that as a link on the Polish tank articles, but it seems doubtful that it kept Gundlach's name in English. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:53, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, though I'm confused by the Mk. IV in the Vickers name.  The periscope saw significant development in Britain, running from Mark 1 through to Mark 12.  Both US and Russian/Soviet usage is based on the British development of the design, albeit at different stages of that development.  Lkchild (talk) 22:58, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: An IP editor has recently challenged and removed the unsourced claim that this periscope was used in Axis tanks. 
The claim is unsourced. It looks shaky too. It's worded as both "from 1940" and "until 1941", which is unclear. It talks about the Tiger, which is a couple of years later. I certainly can't think of a German AFV with rotating periscopes like this.
If we define "Gundlach periscope" as being any AFV periscope with the reverse-viewing prism, then that also implies a rotating periscope and one not in the driver's roof, only able to stare back at the turret mantlet. German tanks favoured all-round cupolas for the commander and didn't need this. I can't think of any example using this type of periscope. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:04, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Axis use?
Talk:White River First Nation

message: This article is an almost word for word copy and paste job from the White River First Nation website's "Background" page: http://whiteriverfirstnation.com/background/. I'm not sure what to do; a simple reference is at least called for, but honestly I feel the page needs to be deleted and started from scratch. I could pick out a few of the most basic facts from the existing test as a starting point (and add the reference)? Thoughts?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Corryvrekan (talk • contribs) 00:26, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that the White River First Nation website's background page may be a copy of the Wikipedia article. The domain 'whiteriverfirstnation.com' was registered in March 2012, and the text you mention has been on the Wikipedia page since January 2007. The website's own metadata shows the article was created on '2013-07-25T20:55:12+00:00' (ie - 25 July 2013). I've searched for previous incarnations of the White River First Nation website (if any) but haven't found anything so far. I think this article is OK, but it does require sources. Mindmatrix 01:40, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serious problem with this article as of 9.22.14
Talk:Pictures of Hollis Woods (film)

message: Deleted the plot synopsis, which was directly copied from the Publishers Weekly review.  If you own this content and have the right to post it here, please provide some evidence.
Oanjao 03:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I merged the novel and movie articles and kept the plot from the movie article since they would be pretty much the same. Ospinad 18:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed copyrighted material 

message: We need an article about the book. Indianparttime2 (talk) 01:06, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Book
Talk:Marcus Licinius Crassus Frugi (consul 27)

message: The revision dated 2 december was created at a new title separate from the existing history, but appears to be derived from it. Redirect attempts from the old title havebeen excluded from the history. —Random832 04:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: hist merge note

message: Son of M. Licinius Crassus Frugi, currently . Syme notes, "in the Annales of Tacitus, only a date" (The Augustan Aristocracy, p. 280). In other words, to write a separate article on this personage that is more than a stub will require a lot of work; best not to attempt it. -- llywrch (talk) 06:11, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marcus Licinius Crassus Frugi (consul 64) 
Talk:FreeWave Technologies

message: Salty3dog marked this page with the notability tag.  He/she failed to make any comment on the matter via messaging me, leaving a comment here, or on their on page.  In fact Salty3dog hasn't even created a user page and the only contribution he/she has done was this tag. I fail to see how this article fails notability.  This was an issue ages ago however, I cleaned up the article since then.  I will keep the tag up for awhile to see if anyone would like to chime in otherwise, I will remove the tag. -SourSW 04:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing that no one has further contributed to the questionable Salty3dog notability tag, I have decided to remove it. SourSW (talk) 14:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Animated Program

message: I believe the two categories for outstanding animated program (less than one hour/more than one hour) have, as of 2010, been merged into a single category. This allows for continuing series such as The Simpsons and Family Guy to compete against one-off specials like Prep and Landing. JackalLantern (talk) 09:22, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards merged
Talk:National Library of Estonia

message: The file :File:RR front view.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:RR front view.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 22:20, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, I've transferred a better quality image from Flickr to WikiCommons and have set that up in the infobox - please let me know if that causes any problems. Loweredtone (talk) 15:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:RR front view.jpg]]
Talk:Interlaken Ost railway station

message: The article claims Interlaken Ost is the main station for Interlaken without citation. I don't think that it is self-evident that it is the main station. Sure it is probably the busiest, because of its junction status, but Interlaken West is much better situated for the actual town of Interlaken. It is noticable that it isn't named Interlaken Hauptbahnhof (or similar), as you might expect if its owners thought of it as the main station.
So I think, to make sure we are not just reflected one editors view of the relative importance of this station, we need a cite. Adding appropriate template. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 19:42, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: On reflection, I think that is over the top. Just making it a station. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 19:47, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main station
Talk:Sandweid railway station

message: As the article say, this station does not appear in any timetables. Nor is it shown on either the maps at http://map.geo.admin.ch/, or on Google maps. The BOB web site makes no reference. The photograph is a degree of evidence, but it isn't a cite and it is five years old. Don't want to delete this article 'cos my gut says it is right, so I've added the unreferenced template. - Starbois (talk)
While I'm not challenging the provenance of the photograph, I don't think we should consider Sandweid a station--at least not now. Here's why I don't think so:
* My copy of Eisenbahnatlas Schweiz (published 2012), shows Sandweid as a service station (non-passenger stop).
* The Bahnprofil Schweiz that accompanies Schiennetz Schweiz (Wägli, 2010), shows the same.
* Sandweid is included in the service points database from SBB but has IS_HALTESTELLE set to 0 (indicating that it is not a stop/station; many such are included in the dataset).
* The current timetable for Interlaken Ost–Lauterbrunnen does not show Sandweid. Fahrplanfelder has timetables for this and other routes going back to 2006. I spot-checked several different years and found no mention of Sandweid.
* There is no mention of Sandweid on the Jungfrau website (owners of Berner Oberland and related companies).
* It's not shown on the regional bus map for the Lauterbrunnen valley, although Sandweidli, the bus stop approximately  down the road from Sandweid, is.
* This isn't a question of a flag/request stop. Many stops in Switzerland include the notation "Halt auf Verlangen", indicating a request stop, but are listed on timetables, shown on maps, and otherwise have a much greater footprint.
Now, all that being said, the bus stop (Sandweidli) does have a small platform that's visible on Google Maps. Per this discussion on Trip Advisor (not reliable but never mind that for this discussion), Sandweidli does have the "secret" request stop feature. The 2014 Jungfrau annual report does report expenditures related to "Station Sandweidli." Again, Sandweidli is listed as a bus station in the service points database and not as a train station.
If you ask me what I think, I think that Sandweid is a control point, and that Sandweidli is a bus stop with a limited off-the-books request stop feature provided for the benefit of the folks who live there. We can verify the bus stop, but most bus stops aren't notable and this one definitely isn't. We can't verify the train service, and even if it does exist, it doesn't exist at the present name. Mackensen (talk) 02:12, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need some references
Talk:Charles Prince Airport

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Charles Prince Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071013011618/http://www.aeroflight.co.uk:80/waf/aa-africa/zim/zim-af-bases.htm to http://www.aeroflight.co.uk/waf/aa-africa/zim/zim-af-bases.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 Cptmrmcmillan (talk) 07:10, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Empress dowager

message: She held her titles in her own right, so she wouldn't be right? unless is was dowager Princess, or dowager Duke of Saxony. 98.206.155.53 (talk) 00:31, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's correct. - PKM (talk) 17:33, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queen Victoria a dowager? 

message: I've assessed this as start class for WikiProject Women's History, as it is unreferenced. - PKM (talk) 17:32, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Natalia Polosmak

message: This article mentions the KGB as if that organization still exists. It does not, as far as I know. The authors should correct this and refer to the actual organization working with the Moscow police on this, whether it's the FSB or another organization. Gladmax 11:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sorry I have no sources about that but some artefact have been sent back to Altai region since this article was written, including the "Pazyryk Ice Queen", which is now in a local museum. Wikipedia is not my domain and I can't change anything, but if any of you have the idea to do a succint google search about it, you'll find sufficent evidence of this.
Jean  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.242.77.12 (talk) 00:52, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Article outdated
Talk:The Painted Word

message: The comment that Wolfe had made some correct observations such as re the 'de-objectification of art' gives the strong impression that he had identified certain trends for the first time. But The Painted Word came two years after Lucy Lippard's extremely influential survey of the same topic, Six Years: The Dematerialisation of the Art Object. I firstly suggest the replacement of the term 'de-objectification of art' with Lippard's, as what he describes has been taken into art language via Lippard's term. But also I just suggest removing this point altogether. Wolfe is a journalist - basic descriptive accuracy should go without saying, and it wasn't anything more revelatory than that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.232.59.224 (talk) 08:59, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  'de-objectification of art'
Talk:Advance-Rumely

message: This article is on the verge of Start Class. Add references, make the product list into prose and include more about what the company does in the introduction. All the intro talks about is how old the company is and its mergers. Notability is questionable. -Jahnx (talk) 05:10, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree mostly -- the article has plenty of potential for improvement! Disagree about product list being converted to prose. An additional section, describing the products in chronological order (showing how they developed), would be a helpful addition, but an organised list is useful as a quick look-up and should be retained. As for notability, WP is large enough to cope with articles about historic machinery manufacturers (of multiple items over many years). EdJogg (talk) 12:39, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Indiana assessment

message: http://www.rumely.com/History.htm 71.102.2.128 (talk) 11:44, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: THE MOTHERLODE
Talk:Crack in the Ground

message: Err, "about 3 kilometers wide?"  Photo looks kinda thin.
dino (talk) 14:40, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The 3 km refers to the width of the subsided area that the crack formed along the edge of, the sentence might benefit from re-wording though, I'll give it some thought. Mikenorton (talk) 15:19, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: about 3 kilometers wide
Talk:Aktau International Airport

message: Turkish Airlines a charter airline? I don't think so...
--195.241.64.175 (talk) 23:36, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:KTTZ-FM

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for a mission in India is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the Kokborok tei Hukumu Mission. - Dravecky (talk) 01:53, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:Sugarloaf Mountain (Massachusetts)

message: Hello folks, it seems that the original article Mount Sugarloaf State Reservation has generated a lot of strong feelings, so I wanted to take the time to explain why I split the information into Mount Sugarloaf State Reservation and Sugarloaf Mountain (Franklin County, Massachusetts).
First, the content of the original article seemed more inclined to informing the reader about the mountain vs. the state reservation (for instance, a "mountain" info box was used). 
Second, those searching for the mountain would not necessarily know to look it up via the name of the reservation.
Third, I had a significant amount of new content ready to be posted about Sugarloaf Mountain and a number of other mountains in the Connecticut River Valley. The information I had didn't seem to fit under an article simply about the reservation, therefore I split the content. 
Fourth, I decided not to simply redirect from Mount Sugarloaf State Reservation to the new page and bundle them together, under the new title, because (as it was pointed out to me by another user), continuity of article history is lost. Furthermore, along these lines, it's true that the reservation differs significantly from the mountain (the reservation has river frontage AND mountain peaks; the reservation has a history of its own; the reservation article could one day include details about reservation operation and management).     
Finally, I used the original images for both articles, as seemed most appropriate for the new formatting. (It would be great if someone had an actual shot of the mountain itself from the bottom).
Let me know what you think.
--Pgagnon999 (talk) 05:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  article split
Talk:Muan International Airport

message: Stop erasing my edits- the airport serves Gwangju & Mokpo cities. It wasn't meant to serve Muan county (rural) exclusively!! The same applies to Sacheon Airport, which serves Jinju & Sacheon (not my edit)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.172.234.230 (talk) 19:19, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Nay Pyi Taw International Airport

message: What is the source for ELA/VYNT? 
According to Great Circle Mapper, ELA is already the IATA code for Eagle Lake, Texas, and Naypyidaw's ICAO code is VYEL........ - Dekthep (talk) 18:24, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Airport Codes
Talk:Monmouth Battlefield State Park

message: "Legend" suggests that deeds or persons are more folklore than actual history, but the deeds of Mary Hayes at the Monmouth Battlefield seem fairly well attested to.  The name shift (from Molly Hayes) is well accounted for within the story ("Molly! Pitcher!")  The fact that she was hardly unique in taking her husband's place in battle (e.g. Margaret Corbin) hardly weakens the credibility of her own accounts.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.32.125.70 (talk) 10:28, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is Molly Pitcher a "legend"?
Talk:Johnsburg High School

message: Greeting editors!
Before adding or re-adding any content to this article, allow me to make some big suggestions based on some past experience I have had:
1.  Go visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools to get a feel for what Wikipedia is looking for in articles about schools.  There are a great many things that you can research and include, but there are many things that you may passionately feel are important, and simply don't belong in an encyclopedia article.  Remember, this is not your school's homepage ... it is an encyclopedia article about your school.
2.  Specifically check out:  What not to include.  This section outlines things that, even if you think they are important, will likely get deleted eventually, and would likely not hold up if the article gets sent to arbitration.  Among the things not to include are events of short term importance like who caught a winning touchdown, how far the team made it in the basketball playoffs (unless it was like a top 4 finish or something like that), the names of coaches or teachers (unless they are otherwise notable), this year's spring musical, the theme for homecoming, etc, etc.  These are all either unencyclopedic, or are matters of short term interest.  They may be of interest to alumni, but remember: this article is NOT being written for alumni, it is being written for anyone who might read it.
3.  Consider having this article assessed by either the folks at WikiProject Schools.  they can be reached by the big links at the top of this Talk Page.  People associated with the project will assess the article, and will give suggestions for improvement.  This may help more specifically guide editors as to what needs to be added and what needs to be removed.
Best of luck! LonelyBeacon 06:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What NOT to include in this article (and what TO include)
Talk:Thomas F. Madden

message: Please try to avoid words like "recent", as they are too vague (see WP:VAGUE), and rapidly become out of date.  When someone reads the article, they can't tell if that paragraph was written in 2008 or 2004!  So it is best to add a specific year.  For example, "As of 2008, Madden's newest book is (title)". --Elonka 17:05, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:California Celebrities Rights Act

message: In the last paragraph of this section, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Veronica_Lake#Notes_from_Stewart_Lake,_the_last_husband_of_Veronica_Lake , poster "Amanda Jean Lake (Proudly A Lake) ... 174.255.203.238 (talk) 04:08, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query: "Celebrity Rights Organization".
Talk:Mitsubishi Debonair

message: Just a sidenote: even if the Debonair's dimensions would fit the present-day American midsize class constraints, this was never meant to be either sold in the US or to perform a role of a midsize class. It was meant to be an upper-class equivalent to the likes of the Nissan President, even if falling short of becoming a serious competitor. I believe modern-day Western classes don't apply, so I would avoid categorization until we have JDM classes implemented. PrinceGloria 07:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know about avoiding classification entirely, but I'll remove it just now and see what happens. I definitely agree that we should have Japanese market names added to car classification, and a less region-centric approach followed in our car articles in future. --DeLarge (talk) 14:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC)