lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Video game modding

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Run Think Shoot Live. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 1#Run Think Shoot Live until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 17:38, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Run Think Shoot Live" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. closing as early snowball. (non-admin closure) — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 15:08, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Mod (video games) →  – Natural disambiguation, and for consistency with similar article names such as modding, video game development and video game design. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 10:08, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Video games has been notified of this discussion.  — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 16:14, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Internet culture has been notified of this discussion.  — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 16:14, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 20 August 2021 

message: — Assignment last updated by Stevesuny (talk) 14:21, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Digital Media and Information in Society

message: I was wondering if topics around how mods are used for bigoted or political reasons could be added into a section. I know there are several instances that have been reported on news sites about mods removing diverse characters and subjects. Pago95 (talk) 14:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  About adding Troll Mods/contriversy section
Talk:FreeDOOM

message: Archived deletion debate from WP:VFD:
It's a stub, nothing links to it, and it consists of nothing more than a paragraph and a link to a sourceforge project. If we allowed every SF project to have its own Wikipedia entry, the Wikipedia would double in size.
--Ardonik 02:55, Jul 16, 2004 (UTC)
*Merge into DOOM community and redirect. —Stormie 03:05, Jul 16, 2004 (UTC)
*Merge and redirect. -- Cyrius|✎ 18:23, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Satomi Kōrogi

message: There seems to be some confusion on what year she was born:the 1962 birth year in this entry is based on her profile in Hitoshi Doi's seiyuu database.However,[LINK REMOVED - BLACKLISTED] lists a 1966 birth year, while  her Japanese Wikipedia entry lists a 1965 birth year.Which source is correct?Arigatou gozaimasu in advance. Ranma9617 03:35, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't this article be titled "Satomi Koorogi" in preference to the macron? I suggest this since "Koorogi" is either her trade name or the one used on her behalf. (See ANN and MOS-JA, macron usage.--Monocrat 22:24, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Searching Production Baobab on Google: Satomi Korogi (nothing), Satomi Kohrogi (nothing), Satomi Koorogi (yes). Also the website I mentioned looks to be her home page, but even if it's not official, the Production Baobab site definitely is. That should count as official trade name. --EmperorBrandon 01:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manual of Style 

message: Pichuuu 198.52.138.104 (talk) 10:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi am pichu
Talk:Programmed cell death

message: July 2004: "Programmed cell death" had been, until today, redirected to "Apoptosis". But for some time now, it became more and more necessary to have a separate article on PCD. First, because, PCD and apoptosis are not synonimous (as explained in the new article on PCD). One of the founding figures in the field, Richard Lockshin, has pointed this out repeatedly (see, for instance, Lockshin and Zakeri: "Programmed cell death and apoptosis: origins of the theory", Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, cited in the article), as well as other authors and researchers (see both Schwarz et al.and Bursh et al., as referenced in the article). 
Another reason for splitting the apoptosis article is that it was getting too big, at the same time that it was encompassing concepts that did not properly belong there, such as plant PCD. -- jaimeglz
April 2006: I totally agree. I am researching on PCD besides caspase-dependent apoptosis and i am grateful for the separation of apoptosis from PCD. PCD is more than apoptosis and there are diverse regulated pathways for a cell to die ;-). -- lt
December 2007: It needs to talk about recent studies on PCD in bacteria - GASP phenotype, toxin/antidote addiction modules, and possibly the entericidin locus. -- jinkbl0t  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.152.178.103 (talk) 20:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "K"

message: If we're going to mention cornification as a type of programmed cell death, why not also discuss keratinization of epithelia in the formation of skin and nail? 130.113.193.20 (talk) 15:20, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cornification/keratinization 

message: Bold merge, due to WP:NOTDIC, stub has not improved in many years, single source, no footnotes, no indication of notability
 Chzz  ►  16:45, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atrophic factors 

message: What advantage exactly does PCD confer to the organism? I didn't find an explanation in the article. One should probably be added; if not in the lead section, then in the body of the article. EIN (talk) 07:57, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've copy-pasted the following text from the apoptosis article to the lead section of this article, but I'm hoping to hear about a post-natal advantage.
 EIN (talk) 17:27, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  “[PCD] usually confers advantage during an organism's life-cycle” 

message: — Assignment last updated by JPH2002 (talk) 18:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Bio 401 Cell Biology S2024
Talk:Andromeda Tonks

message: It's stated that Andromeda's hair must be mousy brown because her daughter's is, right? Can't be - her sisters have blonde and black hair, respectively. Unless one of them is a half-sibling, she must have either blonde or black hair. Tonks probably gets her hair colour from her father. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.107.0.230 (talk • contribs).
::Conversely, she could just be unconsciously mimicking Remus's light brown hair that year.  But it's distinctly possible, genetically, for Andromeda to be a brunette.  Narcissa got seriously recessive genes, but if one of the parents had brown hair (and blond/brown genotype) and the other had black hair (black/blond genotype), then it's quite possible that she got a brown and blond gene and ended up a brunette. Miss w 04:35, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: She seems to be brunette (DH5), but as Teddy Lupin is a metamorphomagus, as his mother, she could be one as well, it does seem to have something to do with genetics. Diana Prallon 19:57, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hair colour 

message: Why does Andromeda have her own article? She has not even appeared in canon. Lord Opeth 00:19, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance in the series 

message: Poor Andromeda, first she gets disowned from her family for the man she loves, then years later she loses her husband, daughter, and son-in-law in war.She truly is a sorrow-stricken character.
:Sorry, but this is not a forum (WP:FORUM).  This talk page is designed to discuss information concerning the article, not the character.  Please take this kind of comment to a forum for more open discussion.  Also, please sign your comments. Kochdude388 20:03, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tragic Character 

message: This is yet another article on a character that barely has any impact on the book, much less the real world in which we all live. There will never be enough secondary sources to establish this character's notability, so it should be merged to the minor characters article. Natalie 15:19, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree...the articles concerning Teddy Lupin and Victoire Weasley are also unneeded, as they provided very little to the story. Kochdude388 20:03, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge
Talk:Flushing (physiology)

message: here is an article on skin flushing (pdf)[]
--Clawed 05:12, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)

message: Maybe someone should put a picture of a flushed face,like in the blush section? 98.14.15.12 (talk) 21:37, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture? 

message: I removed the picture previously on this page. It was of swelling, not flushing. I don't think it was vandalism, but just a misunderstanding of the term. For reference, the removed picture is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MyParonychia.jpg, and is currently featured prominently on the swelling article. Interestingly, the picture lasted for over a year on this page without anyone removing it. /c: — Eric Herboso 06:21, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  swelling picture 

message: I personally get severely flushed when embaraessed, angry, anxious, during excersize and if the blood rushes to my head. I'm only fourteen years old and it's been happneing once to twice a day. I'd like some advice as to what to do? I can't seem to speak up in class anymore, I can't go to my dance classes etc. Is this just temporary or is it long-lasting?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.45.157.117 (talk) 08:51, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advice 

message: It seems to me the page assumes white skin. If not, I would expect to see some discussion of how "red" in the face looks on darker skin tones that wouldn't necessarily look red or pink in the white-skin way. Does it get darker or change hue toward the reddish? Are there variations depending on the shade before flushing? 73.222.208.252 (talk) 08:40, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "red" in different skin colors
Talk:Don't Tell Mom the Babysitter's Dead

message: Changing cameo to brief appearance.  By definition, if Duchovny was unknown, his role was not a Cameo role but rather just a minor appearance.  --Abqwildcat 05:13, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Cameo?

message: Is seeing Kenny's room what kills her? Does it scare her to death? This is the last time we see her while she's alive. The snare 02:41, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Death
Talk:Protestant Cemetery, Rome

message: A temporary page was made for this listing -Gonville 05:26, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've moved the page back to "Protestant Cemetery, Rome" for now. Of course that is not its name, which is "Il Cimitero Acattolico di Roma", but it is what it is called in the majority of English-language sources – compare this search to this one, for example – so in accordance with my understanding of [[WP:COMMONNAME, that is what we should call it here. I suggest that if anyone cares enough to want to change it, a move request would be the way to go. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: I am attempting to add a photo (taken by me) of one of the more beautiful tombstones (John Piccoli, erected in 1955) but am getting an error message: "A file identical to this file (File:CimiteroAcattolicoPiccoliGrave.jpg) has previously been deleted. You should check that file's deletion history before proceeding to re-upload it."  I have searched for this deletion history (am I looking in the right places?) and can find nothing.  Anyway, there is no reason for this photo to be excluded...  If you can help me understand how to solve this problem (i.e. post the photo) I will be most grateful.  You may see the photo here:  http://dan-keller.com/photos/2007-06-Roma/CimiteroAccatolicoPiccoliGrave.jpg  Danomatico (talk) 17:06, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, ! I assume the image is this one? I'm not a great expert on images, but if this is a photograph of a sculpture created in 1955, it may be protected by copyright. I don't know nearly enough about Italian copyright law to comment on that. If you want to be sure before you upload, you could try asking at Commons:Help desk, where there are experts on this sort of question. Good luck! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:44, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I've found Commons:Deletion requests/Image:CimiteroAcattolicoPiccoliGrave.jpg, which I'm afraid confirms what I suspected (that Italy does not have freedom of panorama), and so your picture cannot be hosted on Commons. The sculptor apparently died in 1971. I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:52, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed attempt to add a photo -- advice? 

message: Dear users of Wikipedia, I'm a student at the University of Bergamo, enrolled in the Planning and Management of Tourism Systems master course. I am participating in a project for which I have to add information to several articles here on Wikipedia (Wikipedia:GLAM/UNIBG/Heritage studies and ICT). For this specific article, after checking the sources, I have added some historical information based on the italian version of the same. Feel free to modify and add infomation to my work and don't hesitate to contact me in case you have any questions or doubts. --Chiabase (talk) 09:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding information
Category talk:Nuclear weapons

message: There's a bit of a problem with this being in the "weapons of mass destruction" category: there are nuclear weapons like the dirty bomb and smaller-scale tactical warheads which aren't so-called WMDs. I have no idea of a more appropriate category for this to be in, nor can I think of a good immediate solution. So it's really just something to think about. -Lommer 05:42, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that dirty bombs and tactical warheads are considered WMDs in many contexts, even if a dirty bomb doesn't cause that much "destruction" per se. I think that any nuclear warheads -- tactical are not -- are considered WMDs, though they ride that line. The smallest nukes in the US arsenal are still more powerful than the bomb used to attack federal building in Oklahoma City, for example -- even things that are a "mere" kiloton or so are pretty destructive. In any event, I don't think it matters all that much... --Fastfission 00:13, 17 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Flags of the Australian states and territories

message: Can someone find better small flags for the Australian Capital Territory and Queensland for this page. So they are simple flat graphics not photos or waving flags. 203.220.171.43 05:48, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like someone has already provided great, flat images for both those articles. Jecowa 20:18, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Free Protestant Episcopal Church

message: Glad to see the copyright release.  Even so, a Wikipedia article should never be just a recapitulation of a group's home page, IMHO.  Very few homepages would qualify as NPOV, or meet other stylistic or content guidelines.
Hope that the Bishop-Primus will contribute to the discussion.
207.69.140.20 16:52, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Clearance 

message: See  Doug Weller talk 13:18, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible source
Talk:Jassie Gift

message: Can anybody change the tone of the article to match encyclopedic standards?Anuandraj (talk) 21:35, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It probably means that he also sings and that his voice is famous? WP:INWNB may be the right place to ask but I dunno if any active Malayalis are avialble there. -Gurubrahma 14:14, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 
Wikipedia talk:Sound

message: You are invited to review my Tech Corner. Comments and suggestions will be appreciated. Etz Haim 06:17, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  User:Etz Haim/Tech Corner 

message: I've started a page, meta:Multimedia to discuss developing a better strategy for encouraging and enabling the use of sounds and videos in wikimedia projects. Among other things, it includes an attempt at a much more user-friendly replacement for this page. Please check it out. - IMSoP 16:44, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redesigning our stance on multimedia 

message: I have two very small, very simple WAV files which I would like to upload.  I've visited the Help Page, this page, the Sound page, and the Wiki-Media site.  NOWHERE does it actually say how to upload these files.  When using the "Upload File" button, an error message occurs stating wav is not a valid image format.  Of course not, its a sound file.  How does one upload WAV files to this site?  Please help! -Husnock 12Jan04
:Wikipedia calls all uploads "images" and that is not the problem. WAV files are probably disallowed, as are MIDIs, see above. Hyacinth 21:19, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Need Clear Directions on Uploading

message: Those following this page may be interested in the discussion on my talk page regarding my current project to record and upload certain classical keyboard works.  The Uninvited Co., Inc. 21:33, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music clips project 

message: Why does this page say that everything except full length songs belong at Commons and still there's a whole bunch of pronunciation files as well as guidelines to uploading them there? Is there a point to not uploading pronunciation files at Commons as well? - karmosin 22:40, Mar 5, 2005 (UTC)
:That sentence is in error (that's not what it originally said, but it was not updated properly, and I'm probably the one to blame). →Raul654 19:05, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC)
:Phew. I almost thought I had done a lot of stupid uploading! - karmosin 19:47, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC)
Just wanted to add my 2 cents: It's ridiculous to limit sound files to .ogg. - Nunh-huh 02:01, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: Can we at least get a better error message than, ".mp3 is not a recommended image format"? - which doesn't quite get the message across, considering that (1) Duh, MP3 is not an image file format, and (2) "not recommended" does not imply forbidden.
I disagree with the policy of banning MP3s. Most public domain sound files you can download over the Internet are in MP3 format. We don't want people to take these files and degrade them by transcoding to OGG. Mirror Vax 00:49, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  MP3s banned from wikipedia?
Talk:Sub pop

message: I've never heard of this genre, I have sincere doubts as to whether or not it actually exists.  Anyone else care to weigh in? Alex
:Me neither.  Even "twee pop" I've only heard of in articles.  I've never heard anyone actually say it.  James
I have never heard of this genre. I am familiar with twee-pop though and I suspect that sub-pop came about because someone at the NME heard one band who had a slightly different take on twee-pop than everybody else did. Ive heard of twee-pop being referred to as shambling and cuddlecore as well!Motown Junkie 20:00, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Stars on 45

message: "The '45' in the title refers to the playback speed of a vinyl record single - 45 rpm. Such singles were often simply called "45s". (information provided for the benefit of anyone born after 1984)."
Removed the bit in parentheses because it strikes me as somewhat patronising. Bonalaw 10:26, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)

message: This section needs significant trimming -- it's largely an indiscriminate collection of medleys, many of which are irrelevant. While Stars On 45 can undoubtedly be credited with kicking off the early 1980s medley craze, it doesn't follow that every single medley recording released since that date should be mentioned. The relevant ones would seem to be those that use the "On 45" structure in their name. I'm going to have a crack at cutting it down. Gusworld (talk) 08:16, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is important to state that Stars on 45 didn't invent the concept, wich don't hurt the fact that they were the most successful, bringing it to a #1 position in charts while Cafe Creme was "only" #17 in Netherlands in 1977 (Netherlands is Stars on 45 country). Later, I think it is linked that the Beach Boys and the Beatles companies released their own medley. Of course the article really needed a clarification, I just think you cut a bit too much.--JackAttackFR (talk) 08:08, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other similar acts
Talk:B105 FM

message: From VfD:
I am not sure how big this radio station  is, but it seems very local and not WikiWorthy. -- Solitude 13:40, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A big chunk of the article seems to be about the morning/breakfast show. Are any of the other shows notable? I seem to remember someone from the station threatening to bury Frenzal Rhomb, noteworthy? --Aioth 11:44, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morning Show 

message: This is a small amount of documentation pulled from the B105 archives, these documents are over 30 years old and are unlikely to contain any sensitive information that can be used today.
Even so, I have chosen not to upload a large portion of the documents (100+) as they discuss an issue with the antenna provider which contains TVQ phone numbers, order numbers, addresses, bank details and more, it is possible I can share these if I redact the info manually but given the current lack of local interest in radio I do not consider it to be worth the time or risk.
The primary purpose of sharing this is to archive part of Brisbane's history, not affect the current/future operations of B105 and Triple M. 
If you have any further questions regarding this documentation or the other files that remain, please contact me through the wiki only, consider this an anonymous source.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/jokys4mscec018c/Clipboard_20220826%20%282%29.png?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/7ie7j9rjp1qliae/Clipboard_20220826%20%283%29.png?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/l1mskevw83axwbo/ten.png?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/jnrsnylkezaavog/Clipboard_20220826%20%284%29.png?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/u2k9p9jih92e596/Clipboard_20220826.png?dl=0 B105contributer (talk) 12:34, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antenna Information (1987)
Talk:Tokyo Bay Aqua-Line

message: Just curious. Also, it'll help flesh out the article and the "Bridge-tunnel" article, which lists reasons for all B-T designs except this one. Does anyone know what was the thought process behind selecting a bridge-tunnel design over a high-level bridge or other design? Was it earthquake or other disaster considerations? Cost concerns? Infrastructure problems? The length of the crossing? Aesthetics?—WhosAsking (talk) 14:18, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why a Tunnel? 

message: The article says
:The Tokyo Bay Aqua-Line reduced the drive between Chiba and Kanagawa, two important industrial regions, to 15 minutes
Okay, that's great, but how much of a reduction is this?  Could someone add how long it took to drive from the opposite points before the Aqua-Line was built? Unschool 09:04, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: About 90 min.  Source added. Jpatokal (talk) 10:00, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow—that was fast. Thanks. Unschool 10:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: How much time saved?
Talk:The Sense of Smelling (book)

message: Shouldn't the quote from this book go to one of the Wikipedia sister projects?
I agree. Also, this entry seems to have no context. Perhaps someone could explain the historical significance of this book?
Mihoshi 03:59, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: This excerpt may be the first written description of hay fever.  I can't be certain, since all the references I've been able to find to The Sense of Smelling quote the WP article on Al-Razi al-Razi.  Pastafarian Nights 04:06, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context