Talk:SIM card

message: In this section, I noticed the second sentence reads, "The equivalent of a SIM in UMTS is called the Universal Integrated Circuit Card (UICC), which runs a USIM  application, while the Removable User Identity Module (R-UIM) is more popular in CDMA-based devices e.g. CDMA2000."
HOWEVER, that is not entirely true if you compare that with the UICC entry at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UICC that says, "In a GSM  network, the UICC contains a SIM application and in a UMTS network it is the USIM  application."
Therefore to reads like the UICC is the physical card itself while the application is what identifies the card as SIM or USIM.
Maybe that sort of distinction/clarification should be made somewhere?
Theharlans (talk) 15:18, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions to "Usage in Mobile Phone Standards" section 

message: I removed 
:A device manufactured by NooSY Applehttp://www.noosyapple.com/ has now been released allowing the conversion of mini-SIM cards to micro-SIM cards via a mechanism not unlike that of a hole-puncher.
there's no way this belongs in the lead, which is intended to summarise the article and should only have key points. I question if this belongs at all. Perhaps brief mention of the existance of sim cutters but I don't see the need for any particular brand. Cutting a sim is hardly neuroscience and inventing one is hardly going to win you the nobel prize. I have my doubts most designs are even patentable. There are already lots of different variants and probably just going to be more as time grows on Nil Einne (talk) 08:22, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ... and by far the cheapest design is a pair of scissors! 86.161.56.74 (talk) 15:07, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sim cutter 

message: Why is there a mobile station identification number inside the IMSI when there also is a individual account identification number inside the ICC-ID?  Shouldn't one of them suffice? --Abdull (talk) 15:14, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You may have multiple ICCIDs per single IMSI and this is potentially useful for IMSI reuse, when contact terminates (postpaid) or when "post grace" period ends (prepaid). Mobile operator may order new SIM card to be manufactured for the same IMSI with different ICCID, and keep KI, ADM1, SPC, PIN1, PUK1, PIN2 and PUK2 for both old and new SIM cards in its billing (most often old data are of historic interest only, because operator doesn't have physical access to the old SIM card anyway) --xrgtn (talk) 15:11, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMSI vs. ICC-ID 

message: Reader beware!
24.87.67.125 (talk) 19:38, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ICCID is not the same as IMSI 

message: The current article states:
"In practice, the GSM cryptographic algorithm for computing SRES_2 (see step 4, below) from the Ki has certain vulnerabilities[citation needed] that can allow the extraction of the Ki from a SIM card and the making of a duplicate SIM card."
My understanding is that the function used to derive SRES_2 from Ki is not specified in the GSM standard; rather, it is left to the operator to define this. 
COMP128 is one implementation of the A3/A8 function that has been broken thereby allowing an attacker to derive Ki from a number of SRES_2 responses. IIRC, the implementation of COMP128 did appear in the GSM specs but as an example of a possible function for deriving Ki; It is not is mandated by GSM (which I see as implicit in the quoted text above.)
Should we clarify this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.219.242.155 (talk) 23:06, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible errors in section: Authentication Key? 

message: Note: Care must be taken when removing a SIM adapter from a standard GSM SIM holder as it might bend or break SIM connector pins. I learnt it myself when I broke the pins. I found out on internet that this is a common mistake and many people have and are experiencing it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.161.106.50 (talk) 03:00, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of SIM adapters 

message: Now that ETSI have announced the official Nano SIM standard, shouldn't there be some detailed mention of the upcoming Nano SIMs, apart from on the table? Khairul Islam 04:11, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nano SIMs 

message: http://www.forbes.com/sites/parmyolson/2013/07/21/sim-cards-have-finally-been-hacked-and-the-flaw-could-affect-millions-of-phones/
Someone want to put a dollar figure on that? EllenCT (talk) 23:21, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sic transit gloria mundi 

message: This article says, "As required by E.118, The ITU regularly publishes a list of all internationally assigned IIN codes in its Operational Bulletins. The most recent list, as of June 2012, is in Operational Bulletin No. 1005."
But OB 1005 does not in fact have a list of IINs. 
The current list is now in OB 1040 (pages 13--86) which was issued in 2013 November. It is updated frequently as issuers are added, deleted, et cetera.
http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/opb/sp/T-SP-OB.1040-2013-OAS-PDF-E.pdf
--71.178.95.236 (talk) 02:39, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect citation and link 

message: I have no real technical knowledge of SIM cards, but recently received a "duo" sim card which was a "standard" SIM card with a micro SIM card emebedded in it. After a bit of head scratching looking at Wikipedia & Googling I discovered that you can renove the micro card, which is what I needed to do to fit it into my tablet. I feel that there should be a possibly brief mention of this in this article so that people don't search in vain. 
Jrvzn (talk) 11:00, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duo Sim card 

message: What happened to the company MicroSim that made PCB schematic capture and board generation, and circuit simulation simulation software?
Thanks,
Chris Arena
Portsmouth, Rhode Island
68.9.188.136 (talk) 19:06, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The company MicroSim 

message: Asking because I have a SIM sent to me by a UK phone provider that works for sending and receiving calls, but has a 'blank' phone number -- so my phone (Android) cannot tell me the number of my phone, and apps (such as Google Contacts) cannot, either -- and some are quite confused [AKA: crash].  
It would be quite helpful if the article made it clear where this number is stored, so a reader can use the correct terminology when trying to get the service provider to understand the problem.  quota (talk) 20:06, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which field corresponds to the 'user-known' number for the SIM? 

message: The Apple iPad Air2 uses a fixed, build in SIM card, called Universal SIM based on Apple Patents from 2010. It would be worthwile to identify differences to the eUICC projects by GSMA.
http://www.teltarif.de/apple-universelle-sim-mobilfunkmarkt-netzbetreiber-ipad-air-2-iphone/news/57663.html
joooo 7:36, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Universal SIM by Apple

message: What does Ki actually mean, mathematically? Pronounce it, for starters. kencf0618 (talk) 17:00, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ki vis-à-vis K<sub>i</sub> 

message: I don't understand this sentence in the Multiple-SIM Devices section: "In the Western world dual-SIM devices are less common, and even less so with multiple-SIM phones, but are commonplace in developing markets such as..." In particular, the sub-clause, "and even less so with multiple-SIM phones". Perhaps the writer intended to refer to phones with more than two SIM cards, but this is not what it says. A dual-SIM device is by definition a multiple-SIM device, so the statement that a multiple-SIM device is less common than a dual-SIM device is logically invalid. I changed this around to improve the logic and syntax, and corrected the Western bias by describing where it is more common (i.e. developing world) before where it is less common (Western world). An enterprising editor may wish to draw from the references in the Dual SIM article to strengthen, clarify, and verify this section. --RealGrouchy (talk) 03:17, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dual-SIM section 

message: * We need one;
* Is it just an extension of VAS?
* There is no NFC hardware on the sim, it's just a secure way to store credit card numbers for offline use.
* Where is the specification?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim@ (talk • contribs) 15:10, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  NFC-SIM section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Subscriber identity module. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100426104206/http://www.smartcardstrends.com:80/det_atc.php?idu=287 to http://www.smartcardstrends.com/det_atc.php?idu=287
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:34, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I would change the redirection myself if I knew how.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DreamsOfGenies (talk • contribs) 22:58, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  M2M search redirects here instead of the "Machine to machine" page. 

message: I read in various articles about mobile phones that some of them have "double-SIM". What in the world is that ? --Jerome Potts (talk) 21:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double SIM ? 

message: As far as I know, SIMs contain a CPU. Most of them seem to use an 8-bit AVR core although a number use the ARM7TDMI and ARM has introduced the SecurCore SC300 CPU cadenced at 25MHz. The SC has very granular memory management unlike existing cores. Since the CPUs run the Javacard machine, the fact that vendors describe SIMs as supporting 'Javacard Classic' means that their are ways to exit Javacard. Apparently R0=R1=$FFFF followed by bytecode $FF exits the machine but of course, you don't know what language it drops into.
Defcon 21 has a detailed explaination of how to develop Javacard applets. For their example, the applet could be signed by them but I am unsure how commercial SIMs decide if an applet is authentic and should be allowed to run. It seems very likely that their will be a master key. Android's master key was discovered and I'm prepared to bet that an appropriate SIM with known CPU could exit Javacard and download the entire ROM & RAM of said SIM. If someone discovers the master key, a SIM vector could infect everyone in someone's phonebook via SMS (applets are installed via SMS). The only positive use I can think of is to introduce MESH to aid communications during serious events. Otherwise, it would only be a method of calling a premium number an defrauding people - something that needs to be analysed as a risk.
:Yes. Just like Minix OS used in all Intel SoC and chipsets, all SIM cards run what is called a COS, card operating system, written in C and assembler. See example code here https://github.com/kuriel07/YCOS. And it has nothing to do with Javacard. It is the firmware of the ucontroller, that does elementory files structure and all crypto algorithms. Valery Zapolodov (talk) 15:40, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  CPU 

message: Very closely related short  article. Derek Andrews (talk) 11:40, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 20:59, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Overlay SIM]] 

message: I find the table of SIM card sizes quite useful, except for the column "volume". Not only does it smell of WP:OR, I can't see why it would be important or even interesting to any reader. The word "volume" appears nowhere else in the article (nor in Talk, current or archived) and I can't guess at its importance. Does anybody care about SIM card volume? Shall I remove the column? — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 06:09, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Having not heard any dissent or explanation I have removed the "Volume" column. I've also taken the opportunity to adjust the table toward MOS:ACCESS. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 22:18, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volume of a SIM? 

message: I haven't seen the term SIM-only here in the US. I've seen BYOD (for bring your own device) instead. It would be nice if the article mentioned this. (Of course, a source is needed for this; unfortunately, I don't have one.) I'll add that it seems odd to me that a provider would require a customer to agree to a contract for a SIM-only deal. I think BYOD contracts don't exist in the US; if this is accurate, perhaps this should be added to the article, too. -⁠-⁠184.248.207.170 (talk) 22:17, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the US, the initialism ''BYOD'' is used instead of ''SIM-only'' 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:22, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:52, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: As non-expert the following statement about the LAI doesn't make much sense:
> When the device changes locations, it stores the new LAI to the SIM and sends it back to the operator network with its new location.
1) "with its new location" -> If "new location" refers to the LAI, which can be assumed, what does "it" refer to in "sends it back"?
2) The UE receives the LAI from the network I suppose (whether or not this is correct is missing in this section, but I wouldn't know from where else), so why would the UE send information back to the network that it received from the same network in the first place? Alestrix (talk) 09:47, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location Area Identity