Talk:Spider-Woman (Jessica Drew)

message: Why are all changes on this page undone without explanation? I have remade the alterations, which make this article a lot cleaner and easier to read, and this has been reported.
====Cartoon====
There is a lot of information specicifically about the cartoon series in the 'Depictions in other media' section. I think that the episode guide in particular is too much information to be contained in Jessica Drew's character page. Does anyone else think it would be better with an article of its own? Avengers fan 22:20, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point.  The article now also impies that Conelley works for SHIELD; he's a HYDRA agent.  And we need to figure out a way to differentiate between the "old" versions of SW's origin and the "new" version coming out in SW:Origin in the entry.--Galliaz 13:39, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would suggest inserting a single sentence paragraph in the "Character biography" section stating that her origin story is subject to retconning in the current Spider-Woman: Origin mini, wait till the mini finishes, then expand the paragraph to include the altered details. This should probably be tacked on at the end of the section, since we don't know how much territory the mini will retread.  In addition to the Hydra vs. Hand problem mentioned, there are areas where general cleanup in needed; I'll try to attack this from time to time. Canonblack 19:57, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a workable solution.  It makes sense ot wait for the conclusion of the mini-series.--Galliaz 00:58, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes 

message: There is a lot of information specicifically about the cartoon series in the 'Depictions in other media' section. I think that the episode guide in particular is too much information to be contained in Jessica Drew's character page. Does anyone else think it would be better with an article of its own? Avengers fan 22:20, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cartoon

message: The recent addition has two serious problems.  First, Hydra is not a Japanese organization (but the Hand is).  I do not know which of the two is meant - probably Hydra.  Second, her powers are not supposed to be magic; they were created by genetic and biological tampering by her father and the High Evolutionary. Luis Dantas 21:40, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point.  The article now also impies that Conelley works for SHIELD; he's a HYDRA agent.  And we need to figure out a way to differentiate between the "old" versions of SW's origin and the "new" version coming out in SW:Origin in the entry.--Galliaz 13:39, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would suggest inserting a single sentence paragraph in the "Character biography" section stating that her origin story is subject to retconning in the current Spider-Woman: Origin mini, wait till the mini finishes, then expand the paragraph to include the altered details. This should probably be tacked on at the end of the section, since we don't know how much territory the mini will retread.  In addition to the Hydra vs. Hand problem mentioned, there are areas where general cleanup in needed; I'll try to attack this from time to time. Canonblack 19:57, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a workable solution.  It makes sense ot wait for the conclusion of the mini-series.--Galliaz 00:58, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Confused text

message: Uhm....Why does it link to the DC comic hangman in the part where it lists some of the villians she's fought?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.168.245.134 (talk • contribs) 23:47, November 28, 2006
::Good eye. It's because there is an article for the DC one and not the Marvel one. I've fixed it by making it a redlink. --Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 08:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hangman

message: So, did it end already?  From reading the current version of the article it looks like a reboot (or at least a strong retcon) instead of just a streamlined retelling.  One wonders if Marvel realizes how deeply it contradicts established continuity. Luis Dantas 06:08, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The Marvel Chronology Project believes it can fit in with the existing origin as untold scenes mixed with HYDRA memory implants.  Search under Thread 42: 
===Marvel Ultimate Alliance===
Some of the information on Marvel Ultimate Alliance is wrong or poorly worded. There is no point where a player can actually ask Spider-Woman a question. Spider-Woman has a conversation with the Grey Gargoyle in Mandarin's Palace. He says "Ah, so this is the Amazing Spider-Woman", Spider-Woman corrects him and explains that her pheromones have that effect on people. Later on, one of the Trivia machines, the Strange Trivia machine in Dr Strange's house in particular, has the question "How did Spider-Woman get her powers from Spider-Man?" or something to that effect. There are three options that parody other super heroine origins, such as a blood transfusion, and the fourth one is "She didn't". The player doesn't pose these questions, they're either presented as part of a fixed conversation between characters or the player is asked in a trivia game. It would probably be better to say that at several points, the game asserts that Spider-Man and Spider-Woman are not related in any way. Also, the note that Spider-Woman has a conversation with Black Widow is like saying she's a playable character, every character has a conversation with Black Widow, Nick Fury, Hank Pym and the Vision in one of the hubs, except, I think, Moon Knight, Colossus, Silver Surfer, Nick Fury and the XBox Live downloads. More notable conversations that Spider-Woman has include the Grey Gargoyle, Jarvis and the Enchantress and the Executioner(a double boss meaning she speaks to both at the same time). She also has a conversation with Dr Doom where she says that if she had spidey senses, they'd be tingling right now. Even though these conversations are based on the assumption that she's Jessica Drew, they also work when she wears her Julia Carpenter and May Parker costumes.
You can speak with Spider-Woman in Dr. Strange's house (if she's not already in your party), and you can ask her there if she's related to Spider-Man. I agree some of the article's wording could be better.--71.251.60.53 (talk) 04:01, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin miniseries

message: Some of the information on Marvel Ultimate Alliance is wrong or poorly worded. There is no point where a player can actually ask Spider-Woman a question. Spider-Woman has a conversation with the Grey Gargoyle in Mandarin's Palace. He says "Ah, so this is the Amazing Spider-Woman", Spider-Woman corrects him and explains that her pheromones have that effect on people. Later on, one of the Trivia machines, the Strange Trivia machine in Dr Strange's house in particular, has the question "How did Spider-Woman get her powers from Spider-Man?" or something to that effect. There are three options that parody other super heroine origins, such as a blood transfusion, and the fourth one is "She didn't". The player doesn't pose these questions, they're either presented as part of a fixed conversation between characters or the player is asked in a trivia game. It would probably be better to say that at several points, the game asserts that Spider-Man and Spider-Woman are not related in any way. Also, the note that Spider-Woman has a conversation with Black Widow is like saying she's a playable character, every character has a conversation with Black Widow, Nick Fury, Hank Pym and the Vision in one of the hubs, except, I think, Moon Knight, Colossus, Silver Surfer, Nick Fury and the XBox Live downloads. More notable conversations that Spider-Woman has include the Grey Gargoyle, Jarvis and the Enchantress and the Executioner(a double boss meaning she speaks to both at the same time). She also has a conversation with Dr Doom where she says that if she had spidey senses, they'd be tingling right now. Even though these conversations are based on the assumption that she's Jessica Drew, they also work when she wears her Julia Carpenter and May Parker costumes.
You can speak with Spider-Woman in Dr. Strange's house (if she's not already in your party), and you can ask her there if she's related to Spider-Man. I agree some of the article's wording could be better.--71.251.60.53 (talk) 04:01, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Marvel Ultimate Alliance

message: :Image:Gspiderwoman.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Gspiderwoman.jpg

message: :Image:Newavn014 colv4.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Newavn014 colv4.jpg

message: :Image:Spiderwoman1.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:40, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Spiderwoman1.png

message: :Image:Ultimatespiderwoman.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ultimatespiderwoman.PNG

message: That from the first issue of New Avengers it's not been Spider-woman?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.112.16.178 (talk) 19:10, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it has. Any appearance of it not being so is an error. Rau's Speak Page 02:10, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Oh, I thought you were talking about the hyphenation. Yea, anything that happened after she was replaced should be moved to the empress' article, just like Khn'nr. Rau's Speak Page 23:07, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Should her powers be changed back to what they were known to have been in her last canon appearance.  Specifically, her ability to fly.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.165.163.20 (talk) 15:00, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  how do we deal with the fact 

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 17:33, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - it is in serious need of a lot more references (there are statements made that need a source) and the publication history is tagged as needing expansion so it suggest that aspect isn't being covered properly and needs work. (Emperor (talk) 00:54, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: In early or mid-2008, the U.S. Postal Service put out a set of Marvel Comics postage-stamps, and along with images of much more famous, familiar, and popular Marvel characters (i.e. Spider-Man, Wolverine, Elektra, etc.), there was even included a stamp with Spider-Woman (Jessica Drew)!  
Anyone think this would be worth mentioning somewhere in the article?  Especially as it might emphasize the character's greatly revived status today, since being brought back after about two decades in limbo.  Machine Patience (talk) 23:14, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Provide sources first, preferably multiple sources to both WP:VERIFY this did happen and also to show it was genuinely WP:NOTABLE -- 109.78.217.155 (talk) 14:31, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spider-Woman on a postage stamp: 

message: this page says that the real spiderwoman was a member of the lady liberators, but she wasn't because Maria Hill was still deputy director of SHIELD.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.7.23.78 (talk) 04:59, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  lady liberators 

message: Well, sorry for the question, to be honest I would like to ask how you can replace a picture of Spider-Woman in a frame and a picture of Ultimate Spider-Woman, well that without inscriptions was just in the photo without the signatures. --Shawnee Smith (talk) 10:54, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The image of article Jessica drew and the Ultimate Spider-Woman 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:40, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Jessica Drew.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Sorry three months here I looked and saw a picture where Jessica in the plot of the Ultimate, and now she's gone and where is she?--Hawnee94 (talk) 14:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ultimate Spider Woman 

message: The article claims Spider-Woman regained the [ability of flight] after the Skrull Queen was defeated but no issue reference is given. I removed this claim because in Spider-Woman (comic book) on the last story page of issue 4 and the first pages of issue 5 it is specifically made very clear she cannot fly, and only with the help of her suit can she glide. This could be another retcon but it made more sense to leave out the unsourced contradictory claim. -- 109.78.217.155 (talk) 14:31, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flight 

message: Is there a collected edition table? Rachelskit (talk) 19:17, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Collected Editions

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Spider-Woman (Jessica Drew). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6AOjqEKEw?url=http://www.ign.com/articles/2009/09/15/touring-the-marvel-ultimate-alliance-2-universe to http://uk.comics.ign.com/articles/101/1018503p1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:05, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: One or more images currently used in this article have been nominated for deletion as violations of the non-free content criteria (NFCC). 
You can read more about what this means and why these files are being nominated for deletion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Image deletion nominations for NFCC 8 and 3a.
You can participate at the deletion discussion(s) at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 April 27. If you are not familiar with NFCC-related deletion discussions, I recommend reading the post linked above first.
Sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:21, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Image deletion nomination(s)