lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:(I Love You) For Sentimental Reasons

message: This is the same song as the one under I Love You For Sentimental Reasons and Wikipedia policy is not to have articles for each individual version. There should be no reason not to merge. -- BRG 18:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: merge

message: Agree with PJtP (in "Merge" discussion) that emphasis of article is wrong. The FiveStar single photo in the sidebox should be replaced with one of the four he mentions, preferably Cole as his was biggest commercial success. GBrady (talk) 20:10, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article emphasis wrong- FiveStar over Cole/Cooke/Fitzgerald? 

message: Don't have the Wiki skills to handle the edit, but both the "(I Love You) For Sentimental Reasons" and the "For Sentimental Reasons (1936 Song)" need disambiguation. Thanks for helping.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasmith.sdsu (talk • contribs) 17:10, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguate from "For Sentimental Reasons (1936 Song)" 

message: This article had, among other opinion/attacking things:
"That should be the end of any controversy"
"Best who was always at odds with Watson, and began recording behind Watson's back with another band, after the publishing clearly listed the two names as composer (Best) and lyricist (Watson), had claimed that he'd originally written the lyrics for a little girl as a 12 year old boy, simply does not hold water, since a 12 year old would have no idea about being sentimental, as if two kids could have had a long history. Best and fans of Best had a list of petty complaints and accusations"
That's super-non-encyclopedic, and was added, among other changes, in this single edit:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%28I_Love_You%29_For_Sentimental_Reasons&type=revision&diff=949042121&oldid=948828381
I've removed some of the unverified changes in that edit, although not all - leaving it up to somebody else to check whether other changes should be reverted as well.
--Rihards Olups (talk) 14:11, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-encyclopedic content
Talk:Madison Academy (Tennessee)

message: Here is an info box I made just for Seventh-day Adventist academies. Template:Infobox_Seventh-day_Adventist_Academies. You can see an example of it at Georgia-Cumberland Academy. In Jesus -- Anthony White 03:56, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Info Box
Talk:Herbert Spiegelberg

message: Although I have time nor experience to create such a page it would be a good idea to create a disambiguous page for Spiegelberg, one directing to the place in Germany and the other to Herbert Spiegelberg, the philosopher. The latter is not findable using the internal wikipedia search, because the page of the former shows up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.145.121.149 (talk) 23:13, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggesting a disambiguous page
Talk:Grus (constellation)

message: I still think the wording "The inspiration for this constellation was drawn from Ancient Egypt, where the crane symbolized a stargazer because of its high flight" is tosh. What is the source? The references given all seem to repeat each other. Given that they credit Bayer as the originator rather than Keyser and de Houtman suggests that the scholarship leaves something to be desired. Keyser and de Houtman based their constellations on exotic animals they had seen on their travels. I may do them a disservice, but I doubt they knew anything about ancient Egypt. Skeptic2 (talk) 23:18, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed (five years late...) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:56, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you. Incidentally, I note that some editors are placing rather too much trust in the works of sources such as R.H. Allen and J. Staal, who are not always reliable. This needs watching.Skeptic2 (talk) 11:23, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think you are correct and we need to be careful about them. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:33, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Ancient Egyptian influence

message: cool stars to check out to see if unusual enough to add.....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:33, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources to check and add

message: I removed some material stating the constellation is not visible from the British Isles or northern North America, but it is visible from Florida and California. It's been put back, due possibly to some problem with referencing. My question is, what is the relevance of this constellation not being visible from certain locations, or being visible from certain very specific locations? I would suggest none. We don't say that Ursa Major is not visible from New Zealand, why should we? Similarly, we should avoid this US/UK centric stuff and remove the text - I would respectfully suggest. MidnightBlue (Talk) 14:37, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The language spoken on en.wp is English, hence visibility or otherwise from an English speaking country is more significant. Also, locales are more accessible than latitudes for lay readers. Florida is obviously at the bottom of the US and it is by its latitude that it highlights to the lay reader where the constellation can be seen. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:13, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

text: And it can bee seen from the whole southern hemisphere so no need to say anything. When I write about a northern constellation there will be similar material on how far south it can be seen (if I can find it). Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:14, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where the constellation is visible, or not
Talk:Hydrus

message: *for later Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:46, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Congratulations to all the editors who have helped this article get to Featured Article Status. Content creators and reviewers alike are appreciated because it is hard work to get an article to a place where it is ‘considered the best’ on Wikipedia. Congratulations and Best Regards,
:  Bfpage |leave a message  01:31, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks again Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:46, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Congratulations
Talk:Indus (constellation)

message: The article currently says that the constellation represents an American Indian (a.k.a. Native American).  Presumably this comes from the cited source.  But one of the external-link pages says it isn't known whether that's true or whether it's a person from India.  I have no idea which source is more reliable on this, but in cases where one source says "not known" and another asserts a plausible claim as truth, it seems depressingly common that "not known" is correct.
Since Indus is "the Indian", I was about to link to this article from the Indian disambiguation page, but now I don't know whether to put it in the "American Indian" section or in a new section about things where it is not clear what the referent is!
--207.176.159.90 (talk) 02:42, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made the description more general, to accord with what's said in the references. Whoever wrote the original did not give a reference but presumably took the word of R. H. Allen's Star Names. That book is also presumably the source of the name 'The Persian' for the star Alpha Indi, which has never been widely used by astronomers. Skeptic2 (talk) 11:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was concerned that it might mean Indians from India, as I indicated above.  But if you look carefully at the original page from Uranometria, you can see where it mentions "Americo Vesputio", i.e. Amerigo Vespucci, so that covers that. I've made that change to the Indian page now. --207.176.159.90 (talk) 00:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Bayer mentions three early European observers (Vespucci, Andrea Coralius, Petrus Medinensi) and his contemporary, Petrus Theodori (Pieter Keyser).  We know Vespucci observed the southern sky, but no record survives of his introducing this constellation.  The constellation Indus first appeared on Plancius's globe, using observations of Keyser and de Houtman -- and the latter traveled to the East Indies.  So again, the Indian intended is not clear. -- Elphion (talk) 13:42, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which "Indian"? 

message: asks "if Plancius did not create it, then who did?".  The answer, obviously, is Keyser and de Houtman.  Modern sources are divided in assigning credit. -- Elphion (talk) 12:44, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: We had this discussion some years ago, I remember, and it is true that the sources are divided. It would perhaps be useful to inventorize (but not on this talk page) which RSS assign Indus (and the other 'Plancius' constellations) to Plancius alone, Keyser and de Houtman or all three together. AstroLynx (talk) 11:36, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who created it?
Talk:Lacerta

message: From Frederici Honores:
"It was composed of the stars ι, κ, λ, ο, and ψ Andromedae. The constellation is no longer in use."
Likewise, see:
It's simply false to say, as the History section here does, that Frederici Honores occupied the same space as Lacerta. Indeed, a close look at that last image will show that Lacerta is labelled as co-existing with Gloria Frederici/Frederici Honores. Perhaps the original Frederici Honores was more extensive, but there is no evidence provided for this. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:05, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Leo Minor

message: See this and this to read....Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:01, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Shouldn't "Leo Minor" be translated as "Lesser Lion" then "Smaller Lion"? Nick O'Sea (talk) 19:33, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leo Minor 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Sidney Hall - Urania's Mirror - Leo Major and Leo Minor.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 1, 2018. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2018-02-01. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:59, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Sidney Hall - Urania's Mirror - Leo Major and Leo Minor.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:The Last Grain Race

message: I have written a plot introduction and plot summary, along with some additional information on the Erikson Line and some relevant external links Ivankinsman 18:38, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. (See contributor copyright investigations for background.)  Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Lepus (constellation)

message: The rabbit is clearly being chased by the big dog, Canis Major.  
Whether the dog belongs to the hunter is not clear.
SyntheticET (talk) 12:22, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chasing Lepus Rabbit 

message: Lepus has never looked like a quadrilateral to me. (Delta, according to Norton's, is the star north of Gamma.) It's more shapely than that. Rothorpe (talk) 18:18, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious asterism

message: I was looking at the Chinese Asterisms from the 28 lunar mansions.
In the White Tiger of the West, the Three Stars mansion contains Orion and Lepus.
Why are the asterisms of Lepus named excrement and toilet??
I find it almost offensive and yet at the same time funny.  It reminds me of the terms "Leprosy" and "Royal Flush".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blazeitup52 (talk • contribs) 04:08, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's better to talk about this in the Chinese Constellations article then here. MasterWolf0928-Æthelwulf (talk) 15:34, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese Asterisms
Talk:Father of medicare

message: The section on Douglas includes a tangential, unsourced, and unencyclopedic ("Alas, ...") attack on recent, entirely post-"father(s) of medicare" policies of Saskatchewan.  If anyone's inclined to rewrite it to make it relevant and properly sourced, they should; otherwise it should simply be deleted. Trolleybus (talk) 00:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tangential, unsourced material 
Talk:Corollary

message: This stub is important. i just found it. it should never be deleted or consumed into a larger article.
I didn't write any of it but it's a really valid page about a mathematical concept.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oxinabox (talk • contribs) 23:04, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Don't delete

message: This math article is NOT a stub, there is simply not more to say about this topic. It gives a valid and very helpful distinction between the most often confused terms. I think it is not a stub but simply concise and thus a very good example for a successfull entry in wikipedia. 
(Netzwerkerin (talk) 16:38, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't delete articles for being stubs.  We might delete, or merge, articles for there being little to say about the topic.  Although I strongly suspect that in this case there are in fact more to say.  Taemyr (talk) 06:35, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Don't delete

message: Well something to add would be the non-mathematical use of the term.  In colloquial use it doesn't mean exactly the same thing.  87.115.48.138 (talk) 13:59, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: non-mathematics use

message: English: that should be of lesser. Mathematics: it happens quite often that a corollary is an important result in its own right, perhaps a very famous one at that. The author wishes to point out that this important result now follows easily from the just-established theorem, and indicates it as a corollary to stress this. 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:6952:F0EE:E8A3:95CF (talk) 14:48, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  of less importance 

message: Is it correct to refer to a result as a corollary if it predates the corresponding theorem?
The corollary may have been a theorem without its own name (if it were not well known or recognised until after the more general result), or a conjecture, or stated as if proved but this was later considered inadequate because of some deeper issue (or it may have been introduced without full mathematical rigour e.g. by a scientist).
A possible example is Einstein's (1914) version of the (1930s) Wiener-Khinchin theorem. Einstein's may rely on existence that Wiener and Khinchin strove not to require. 192.76.8.66 (talk) 13:05, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corollary predating theorem?
Talk:Jan Piłsudski

message: Been busy lately, but I did want to answer the question posed to me by user:Piotrus on April 10, 2007 , with his edit summary, regarding my calling Jan Pilsudski, a Polish politician. It reads ... (hmm, are you sure he was a Polish politician? Not a Lithuanian one, like you claim Jozef Pilsudski was?). Since I'll assume good faith and that you weren't being snide, let me give you the courtesy of an answer. Yes, I'm sure, just like I believe that Fujimori is a Peruvian politician. Regarding the Marszalek, maybe you're confusing me with Norman Davies. He writes of Jozef Pilsudski, He was a Lithuanian of Polish culture, born in 1867, the son of a landed family... I know you are fond of Davies. He states this in more than one of his works, White Eagle, Red Star and Heart of Europe, the Past in Poland's Present are two examples. Dr. Dan 18:41, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Answer to Query

message: The question regarding this particular Pilsudski's place of birth, or his brother, concerns whether or not we need to teach the Polish language to our readers on English Wikipedia? Should the lead sentence actually read (), or rather "Like his famous brother, Piłsudski was born in Zalavas (), in Lithuania (), in what was then the Russian Empire ()"? Or leave it as Zalavas? Any argument for the former such as Polish manuscripts, and "Google hits", should not be accepted as a reason for its inclusion couched under some nationalistic, chauvinistic, belief that this somehow changes the ethnicity of the Pilsudski family.  The village is in Lithuania, there is an article about it on Polish Wikipedia with its Polish geographical name. Right click on the Polish link to the article and it's easy to settle. Let's not have the same people cropping up to play games and regurgitate this old stuff up again. Especially now that they have been rehabilitated. Dr. Dan (talk) 04:55, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Berlitz Corporation|Berlitz]]
Talk:Jasper Park, Edmonton

message: Shouldn't redirect to the article on the town of Jasper Place.  Jasper Park is a smaller neighborhood within the larger Japser Place area and is quite distinct.
Johntwrl 18:42, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I figured a redirect is better than a red link, as there's no article yet about Jasper Park. --Qyd 18:53, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Andy Ducat

message: In expanding the History of Southend United F.C., based on club documents available via Companies House, I noticed that an early investor in the club was one Andrew Ducat (listed in the 1906 Prospectus as living at 7 Hermitage Road, Westcliff, a builder). I don't think this is the same Andy Ducat - this article says he grew up in Southend and played for Southend Athletic (two of United's first professionals were signed from Southend Athletic FC) - as he would only have been 20 in August 1906. So I wonder if the investor was perhaps a relative (maybe his father?)? or is just a coincidence? - Paul W (talk) 14:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Southend United connection?
Talk:Five Spot Café

message: I have found some great articles about the club so I've modified the page. It would be marvelous to insert this photo (http://www.5spotartifacts.com/) of the club, but I don't know if I can upload it.--Dan8700 (talk) 18:35, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Uploading query

message: If my memory is correct (and it was 55 years ago) Roy Haynes joined Monk during the Five Spot gig at about the same time as Abdul-Malik did. I found this URL for a live recording that reinforces my recollection.  http://www.cduniverse.com/search/xx/music/pid/1109376/a/Live+At+The+Five+Spot.htm 
Monk recorded very little with Coltrane, a great shame, as it was one of the most innovative quartets in jazz history. Activist (talk) 19:16, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've restored the deletions of Haynes and Abdul-Malik to the article. Wilson's career was cut tragically short when he died of meningitis, and Roy Haynes is still alive at 93, having had an exceptionally distinguished career. Activist (talk) 13:57, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Monk Quartet
Talk:Charles Becker

message: Ambiguity: (submitted by the other Charles Becker captclbecker@yahoo.com), see the Wikipedia entry for the Naval Ship USNS Rappahannock for reference to the civil service mariner Captain Charles Becker (b. 1951).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.188.77.45 (talk) 04:57, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Anonymous editor 71.51.139.232 has repeatedly attempted to change Becker's dates of birth and death without giving references. I have reverted them to those originally given in this article. The date of Becker's death, 30 July 1915, is incontrovertible - see the New York Times, Sun, American, Tribune and any one of literally hundreds of other newspapers for 31 July, all of which report his death in the electric chair. The date of his birth is more difficult to determine, as there seem to be two birth certificates in the same name, giving different dates - but the alternatives are 1870 and 1873, not 1869 as suggested by editor 71.51.139.232. The choice of July 1870 as the correct date is based on the statement made by Becker at the time of his first conviction for murder (1912) and reported in the New York Sun, 25 October 1912, that he was then 42 years old. For a full discussion, see Satan's Circus pp.364-5. If editor 71.51.139.232 wishes to challenge these dates, he should provide full sources to back up his assertions rather than constantly changing dates without supplying any proof that his are correct - particularly as it is unarguably wrong to suggest Becker died on 7 July 1915. Mikedash (talk) 10:08, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates of birth and death 
Talk:SECR D class

message: I have deleted this statement: "Surtees took his inspiration from the LSWR M7 Class 4-4-0" because the M7 was a 0-4-4T so I suspect the writer was thinking of some other locomotive. Biscuittin 18:53, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement removed 

message: I want No. 737 to be restored to steam and be back in working order, so that I can drive the engine.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.13.1.83 (talk) 17:36, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect, based on your question, that you found one of our over 5.4 million articles and thought we were affiliated in some way with that subject. Please note that you are at Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and this page is for discussion on how to improve the SECR D class article. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:36, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  I want No. 737 to steam again.
Talk:Lynx (constellation)

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Sidney Hall - Urania's Mirror - Lynx and Telescopium Herschilii.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on March 12, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-03-12. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Sidney Hall - Urania's Mirror - Lynx and Telescopium Herschilii.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: Dear all:
In the photo labelled as "The constellation of Lynx as it can be seen by the naked eye" there are some lines that should show the constellation. But, according to the IAU chart, some lines are missing (and another is not correct) in spite of the fact that the corresponding stars can be seen in the photography. 
I tried to annex the photo with some marks, but I do not know how to do it.
Best regards,
Santiago Jordá  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.45.8.109 (talk) 16:33, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo: The constellation of Lynx as it can be seen by the naked eye