lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Taste the Blood of Dracula

message: The citation to back up the claim that Vincent Price was supposed to appear in the movie but was released from his contract when the budget was cut, leads to the Answers.Com page that is just a duplication of this page, making it a circular reference. I will remove this citation.
I seem to recall that in the audio commentary for the trailer collection The Horror of Hammer, Hammer scholar Ted Newsom claimed that Price was considered but was never actually hired. I'll check to be sure before citing it. Pearce.duncan (talk) 21:29, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Vincent Price
Talk:Scars of Dracula

message: The discrepancy can be explained thus: Assuming the original film to be 24 FPS (frames per second), and the PAL DVD release sped up slightly to be 25 FPS, this means that while the DVD has a runtime of about 91½ minutes, the original film would have a runtime of about 95½ minutes (91½ / 24 * 25). A NTSC DVD would have a runtime much closer to the original film runtime.
See this for a discussion: http://forum.doom9.org/archive/index.php/t-14391.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.157.188.132 (talk) 22:06, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the running time
Talk:The Mummy (1959 film)

message: The pictures are so dark!  I can hardly see them.  Does anyone know how to fix? Z Wylld 19:31, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dark pictures 
Talk:Dr. Jekyll and Sister Hyde

message: In what sense is this an AIP film? The company is not mentioned in the text. Harfarhs (talk) 18:52, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Category: American International Pictures films"
Talk:Tortured Souls: Animae Damnatae

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:59, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Given the text a brief once-over and tweaked a couple of typos, but there's relatively little here to actually edit. Seems generally fine - perhaps the removal of copyrighted material mentioned above actually took care of most of the issues... Brickie (talk) 14:19, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit
Talk:Who Dares Wins (film)

message: Ive rewrote the plot section, i hope it's not too long. Ive also added production notes i got from the DVD's audio commentary. Everything ive added has come from the DVD.--86.21.136.74 (talk) 14:42, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot rewrites and Production notes 
Talk:The Phantom of the Opera (1989 film)

message: Plot section is too long... Moocowsrule (talk) 19:40, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot
Talk:Horror Express

message: I deleted the trivia section since the only item in it is already covered previously in the article. Monkey Bounce (talk) 00:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia section 

message: The link to an apparently public domain version on IA was flagged up and then removed  but we still have the see also link, which should probably go if it isn't. The only evidence given was this which says "Thanks to a legal snafu involving the American distributor, Horror Express fell into the public domain" which sounds like a Night of the Living Dead situation. I am no expert but reading up on URAA would this not depend on it having been properly copyrighted anywhere? Also, given that copyright varies considerable, should the link be in if it is PD anywhere and it is up to the downloader to decide if it is PD in their own homeland? (Emperor (talk) 21:42, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no reason the article has to have a such a link. I'm also no expert, but to me it looks like the copyright was restored by URAA and a notice of intent to enforce copyright is on file in the US. I removed a Youtube link from the External links section: the video had been taken down anyway. As Emperor pointed out, anyone who wants to try and view it online is free to do their own search and take their own risk. Richigi (talk) 02:24, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright status
Talk:Keeper of the Seven Keys: The Legacy

message: At the startof the song, there are a number of songs played in the background as if the "Keeper" is switching through different radio stations. I'm assuming that all clips that are played in the song are previous Helloween songs from earlier albums; could anyone identify them?~~NaN 17:45, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Occasion Ave.
Talk:The Assassination Bureau

message: Shouldn't this be a about a book, and the film info moved to The Assassination Bureau (movie)?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  18:53, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It depends. Is the book better known than the film? Is someone willing to write an article on the book? If these aren't the case, the film belongs here, as people have demonstrated the interest in writing about the film. Of course, if the book is the basis of the film, it should at least be mentioned here. If not, it might be useful to create a disambiguation link (e.g., to The Assassination Bureau (book)), even if the book article doesn't yet exist. These issues can be addressed at any time such a conflict arises, so there's no hurry to fix the problem until it exists. (One note: if the film article gets a qualifier, it should be "The Assassination Bureau (film)", by current Wikipedia practice.) ~ Jeff Q (talk) 20:52, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book or film 

message: This section should be reorganized and heavily trimmed. The distinction between main cast and supporting cast is arbitrary and unsourced, and the "cameo cast" section listing all the extras is completely superfluous. Also, that's not what a "cameo" is. --Kumagoro-42 (talk) 19:02, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast section 

message: at points during the text the article refers to both "Miss Winter" and "Miss Winters". 206.142.198.255 (talk) 07:04, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winter or Winters
Talk:1967 Liberal Party leadership election

message: Jeremy Thorpe secured the most votes in the first round, but did not win overall, as the rules said that he needed to win more than half of votes cast. Both Hooson and Lubbock's second preferences voted for one another, cancelling one another out, so faced with a deadlock, both other candidates withdrew from the contest to endorse Thorpe who was consequentially elected unopposed.
Surely in STV there would have been some form of lot to decide which of Hooson & Lubbock to eliminate and then the other would have gone on to lose to Thorpe on the "whoever leads earlier wins in a tie" rule? Timrollpickering 00:24, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rules
Talk:The Great Escape II: The Untold Story

message: GavahauaiaiwhvwvwgegehwjaiOJhwvvev3v3v3vvaVavahjai3oihvqvaiaoei3j4jwjBVVfaywuejaBBBBbsbej3j 185.254.200.75 (talk) 18:48, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  3u3u
Talk:Escape to Witch Mountain

message: The poster image I supplied from impawards.com is not of the best quality.  Could someone find a better image of this?  Thanks.  Reimelt 17:46, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better image 

message: I have removed the section about this "fan community" and the link in the references. There is a link to this on one of the other reference pages. This "fan community" seems to consist of people asking other people to pay $2 for a sheet of paper with their name on it and $10 to have their name listed in yellow on a list of members. Including it here seems like advertising. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.187.189.118 (talk • contribs) 05:46, 3 April 2007
:To the above poster: Please sign your posts. You are highly incorrect in your evaluation of the pricing of joining the fan community. The $2.00 fee covers a certificate of membership and submittal into an online database. Considering that $0.41 of that $2.00 fee goes just to postage alone, it's a pretty good deal. The $10.00 donation is just that - a donation - and it is not required for membership. I suggest that in the future you research a topic in full before making a quick judgment. 71.100.17.36 00:38, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a moot point.  The Society was originally hosted on MSN Groups, defunct as of October 2008.  The link from The Witch Mountain Experience no longer works. Although The Witch Mountain Experience claims to be unaffiliated with the Walt Disney Company, it appears to be shilling for them. —QuicksilverT @ 07:39, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Society of Fans of Witch Mountain 

message: Right now the sections for the 1975 and 1995 films are entirely empty except for links to the articles about those films.  This is not the way it should go.  If a sub-topic of an article is important enough to merit its own article, it definitely should be summarized in the article about the main topic. I'm going to look back in the history and see if there were summaries that someone mistakenly removed. -- 65.78.13.238 (talk) 01:50, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summaries 

message: I'm trying to get rid of the vandalism on this page but cannot for some reason. If someone else would take care of this I would appreciate it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.224.91.88 (talk) 02:31, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: Because this is supposed to be about the novel, I assessed it at a stub. Most of the info here is about the films and should be moved.Tlqk56 (talk) 02:00, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment
Talk:Soldier Blue

message: "(no doubt at the insistence of shlock-meister producer Levine)"
Who's Levine? His name appears once. Why is he a schock-meister?
Deleting
15:47, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: ==========
Talk:1984 (1956 film)

message: I have deleted the link to the illicit hosting of this British film on Internet Archive. Director 
Michael Anderson is still alive, so UK copyright will not start running until he dies, and will last for 70 years after the end of the year in which he does. As a non-US film still under copyright in its country of origin on 1 January 1996, it is protected in the US for 95 years after publication, so to the end of 2051. Nick Cooper (talk) 19:56, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright status 

message: The article previously included the unsourced claim: "After distributor agreements expired, the film was withdrawn from theatrical and TV distribution channels by Orwell's estate and has not been officially available for many years." Given numerous sources sell DVDs of the 1956 version online, including remastered copies on Amazon, that statement, if once true, no longer is.70.110.132.191 (talk) 15:38, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed unsourced claim
Talk:Moon Zero Two

message: Upon watching Moon Zero Two I noticed Kemp's mentioning "Ice mines" as a resource on the moon.  I was surprised at such an early mention.  Do we know whether this was just pure speculative fiction that turned out to be true, or were there theories of Lunar water in 1969? User:Watcher4200 20 October 2022  — Preceding undated comment added 20:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ice mines" mention in 1969 

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 21:14, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 
Talk:Hammer filmography

message: I've never understood why list articles do this. Wouldn't it be better to have the entire thing as one list so that the sorting functions worked properly? Right now it's a little pointless to sort by anything other than date. Would there be any objections to me converting this to a single list? Matt Deres (talk) 21:23, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different list in each decade
Talk:Diploma of Education

message: I live in the "Commonwealth" (which I take to mean Commonwealth of Nations, formerly British Commonwealth, rather than the Commonwealth of Massachusetts or the Commonwealth of Independent States), specifically in Britain. and I've never heard of this (we have a Dip Ed - Diploma of Education or a PGCE, postgraduate Certificate of Education). I therefore dispute whether this is "a common professional qualification for school teachers in the Commonwealth". Tonywalton  | Talk 00:34, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. The country / countries where this exists should be named. Ian Cairns 09:13, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I live in Australia and it is either DipEd or GradDipEd in all states as far as I am aware. However, such a qualification was historically awarded in the state of Queensland back in the days when TAFEs were still called CAEs. Orderinchaos78 14:33, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: From "DipTchg" page
Talk:Newtown High School (Connecticut)

message: Lets get a picture up to keep it looking better!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.66.145.180 (talk) 22:41, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: As funny as the Emo section was, it really wasn't needed. Like, at all. So I got rid of it. Yeah.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. Cribbit (talk • contribs) 12:14, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Emo Section

message: Some of the recent additions to the page are of questionable value and purpose. Although some of them do have merit, I think that a lot of it can afford to be left out. Htmlguru4242 (talk) 23:00, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent Addidions

message: i suggest that the nighthawk section be re-titled "mascot" and the pedophile part be a new suggestion at all. also, 'It should be noted this school endorses homosexuality at a young age with their offensive Gay Straight Alliance' is very biased and should probably re written. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.181.181.97 (talk) 01:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nighthawk section 

message: Did the principal ever actually say that "only gross kids" got infected? I think we'd definitely need a source for that or we should take it down.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.151.40.233 (talk) 13:26, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mrsa scare 
Talk:The Big Broadcast of 1937

message: The original article made no mention of conductor Leopold Stokowski making his first film appearance, even though his name is clearly shown on the cover illustration, so I have added it in. I have also deleted the reference to Richard Tauber and the Vienna Boys Choir because they were in a different film in the series, not this one, namely The Big Broadcast of 1936.  As will be seen on the cover illustration of that movie, Tauber's name appears at the bottom of the cast list.  Also, although there's a reference in the article to The Big Broadcast of 1937 not having appeared on VHS or DVD, googling reveals that it was released on DVD, though Amazon states that it is 'not currently available.'Philipson55 (talk) 06:32, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stokowski and Tauber
Talk:The Big Broadcast of 1936

message: Although Richard Tauber's name appears at the bottom of the cast list in the illustration (the 'theatrical poster') it does not appear anywhere in the article, either in the plot summary or in the list of cast members. There is however a reference to a radio broadcast by the Vienna Boys Choir, so did Tauber actually appear in this film or was his voice heard just in a recording, presumably accompanied by the Vienna Boys Choir?Philipson55 (talk) 06:44, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard Tauber
Talk:Woodruff-Riter-Stewart Home

message: I agree that the picture is not bad, but... What does the external link add to the article? To give us contact information for the bed and breakfast? Why was that person "noted"? Who is the architect? Is this article an advertisement? --Michaël 00:44, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not meant to be an ad. It's just one of the houses in Salt Lake that has a history and looks interesting. I took the picture and User:Cool Hand Luke knew enough about it to make an article for it. And the external link, well, it is a way to spend time at that place, so I don't see anything wrong with it, really. BigBen212 05:30, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks --Michaël 09:05, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ad
Talk:Otto Jespersen

message: I found three pictures of O. Jespersen here, but I have no idea how copyright laws work. Is there anyone who can explain? yhever 00:47, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: These are no longer available.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 10:59, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A picture of Otto Jespersen 

message: Is there any specific sense for ff at 1909ff:? Or a typo? Sibazyun 03:57, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think the writer means 'and in later years'. The seven volumes were published in 1909, 1914, 1927, 1931, 1940, 1942, and 1949. I've changed the '1909ff' to '1909-49' --gramorak (talk) 12:10, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the suggestion.  In other languages, 'ff appears just as in this English edition.  I will correct some of them. Sibazyun (talk) 02:53, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Biography 

message: He is listed in my 1951 (14th ed.) copy of the Encyclopaedia Britannica as the author of an article of central importance within the field of linguistics:  "Language." Would this be worth mentioning in his bio here? 97.82.251.9 (talk) 18:35, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encyclopaedia Britannica author/editor 

message: It should probably be mentioned somewhere that he was the first to study the Great Vowel Shift, and that he also coined the term. (ref ) I have not checked the source. 95.155.201.41 (talk) 12:02, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I would strongly doubt that he was the first to study something whose existence has been fairly obvious since at least the eighteenth century to many people who have been struck by the fact that the written vowel letters a, e, i etc. are often pronounced very differently in English vs. many continental European languages... AnonMoos (talk) 10:43, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  AnonMoos, doubt comes in at least two varieties: good and lazy. Whether or not Otto Jespersen was the first to study the Great Vowel Shift, he certainly coined the term, something you could easily have verified. See for instance The `Great Vowel Shift' again: The evidence of the traditional Northern dialects. Henrik Thiil Nielsen (talk) 23:47, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: He was the one who gave it the name it's now known by, and may have been among the earliest to study it systematically from a linguistic point of view, but I find it extremely difficult to believe that he was the first to notice or discuss it.  Almost any Spanish-, Italian-, or German-language speaker in the 18th or 19th centuries who was trying to learn English would have wondered why the heck the letters "a", "e", and "i" often have very strange sound-values in English (at a minimum)... AnonMoos (talk) 08:27, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Great Vowel Shift 

message: Why don't you here mention his discovery of the laws of the Great Vowel Shift? 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Vowel_Shift 
Something may be wrong in the state of Denmark. But what about conditions in Britain and its 'superior' edusys, if this thought doesn't occur to you? 181.214.159.165 (talk) 21:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great Vowel Shift (bis)
Talk:David Pajo

message: How is his name pronounced?  Is it "Pa-joe" or "Pa-Hoe"? Timothyreal 00:51, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's pronounced "Pa-Hoe".  At least that's how he introduces himself on the Zwan DVD.  The name sounds Spanish but in the same segment he says that his dad is originally from the Phillipines. So there you go.--Lairor 18:09, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: i've edited the article to include is past in loads of louisville hardcore bands. all the stuff can be verified through a quick view up to louisvillehardcore.com 193.170.68.246 13:37, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hardcore history

message: Papa M is just an alias of David Pajo, so it would make sense to merge this here (especially since there isn't too much there anyway, and much of it is repeated here). If there are no objections, I'll make it so in a week or so. +mt 10:56, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Papa M here

message: Is a solo project, right? So the members of Dead Child who were in it, were the backing band, not 'in' it as such? The para about Dead Child suggests otherwise. Don't know anything about this, so don't want to incorrectly edit... Millichip (talk) 15:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aerial M 

message: Hi all, included information about Household Gods. This is a band with Vern Rumsey of Unwound Conan Neutron and LKN. As it meets notability requirements, I made a page for it... but I believe it warrants inclusion on David's main page as an associated act and within bio. Will update this when the record releases. Top pocket man (talk) 17:32, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Household Gods 

message: He is in Gang of Four, it isn't a temporary thing, changed the wording to reflect that. HeyHeyHayden (talk) 22:40, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gang of Four
Talk:Richard M. Dudley

message: I'm doubtful about having a list of some of his publications here. Is there any other mathematician page on 
wikipedia that includes such a list? I cannot think of one. 
--Pierremenard 18:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed publications to books, which is more in line with wikipedia practice. --Pierremenard 15:47, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publications? 

message: RMD retired in 2015. 
Real Analysis and Probability had a second edition in 2002.
Uniform Central Limit Theorems had a second edition in 2014.
Regarding reference 3, "Lecture Notes on Mathematical Statistics" were posted at one time on the MIT OpenCourseWare site.
Those notes had rather little if anything about learning theory and less about the entropy integral. Marlindale (talk) 05:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates 12/16 

message: The second edition of Real Analysis and Probability in 2002 was published by Cambridge University Press. For the reason given in 12/16, reference 3 is incorrect and I suggest it be deleted. Marlindale (talk) 16:54, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Further updates 6/17
Talk:Ginny Montes

message: I am the Donald Albury to whom Ginny Montes was married. I am somewhat distanced from her now, as we divorced more than 25 years ago. I can't even remember her birthday any more. I realize that this might be seen as a vanity article, but it is based on information available on the Internet, and she did have some claim to fame. -- Dalbury(Talk) 01:06, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disclaimer

message: I noticed she's in the category 1994 births. Could someone take her off and add her to deaths? I don't know how... Wikipeep 494 22:34, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 1994 Births...
Talk:Stańczyk

message: This article is currently at start/C class, but could be improved to B-class if it had more (inline) citations. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 18:05, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review