lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Clathrin

message: stabilization of kinetochromo fibres requires the trimetric structure of Clathrin
The contributor obviously meant kinetochrome but that word is too rare compared with kinetochore. From the first glance at roots from which they're constructed, both might be synonyms, however my experience does not allow to judge which one is more correct. Found no online source which explains this ambiguity. In general, "kinetochrome+clathrin" produces no search results at all; on the other hand, for example, both versions can be found for . The more popular version won. saimhe (talk) 10:13, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  kinetochrome or kinetochore? 

message: It's unfortunate that a search for the clathrin coated pits redirects to this article, but then the subject is not directly mentioned. This is confusion to someone who would like to learn more about the exact nature of these pits and how they form. Or am I missing something?85.178.3.14 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 14:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Clathrin Coated Pit
Talk:Transferrin

message: The page needs to linked to other Wikipedia articles in other languages.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.20.228.59 (talk) 16:31, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it neccessary to create a page for Transferrin family? I quote: The transferrin family is a group of proteins, defined by conserved amino acid motifs and putative function, found in both vertebrates and invertebrates. Included in this group are molecules known to bind iron, including serum transferrin, ovotransferrin, lactotransferrin, and melanotransferrin (MTF). Additional members of this family include inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase (ICA; mammals), major yolk protein (sea urchins), saxiphilin (frog), pacifastin (crayfish), and TTF-1 (algae). --CopperKettle 12:28, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Family

message: (It would be interesting difference between transferrin and transferritin (similar names, with different meanings). BoldLuis (talk) 12:12, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transferrin and transferritin
Talk:Dynamin

message: The links to dynamin animations are broken, instead just leading to the lab director's page.
Quickfastgoninja (talk) 22:21, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to cartoons are broken 

message: While the information is interesting, these are not what I would call Reliable sources. 
*www.biolink.org.au/library/File/Bio-Link%20-%20Dynamin%20Inhibitor%20Summary%20-%20Epilepsy%20-%20121406.pdf
*pepck-and-the-ketogenic-diet.com/GTPsynaptictransmission.html
Surely there must be peer reviewed sources out there.--DO11.10 18:53, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aren't there better references?
Talk:Sphingolipid

message: I'm not sure the reference to the sphinx in the etymology is correct, this reference suggests the origin is from sphingein, Greek "to bind":
http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/sphingolipid
Through sphingomyelin, which is mostly composed of sphingolipids:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphingomyelin
People have compared them to the sphinx, but I don't think that's the origin of the name:
https://www.caymanchem.com/app/template/Article.vm/article/2142;jsessionid=16297491D97E8ECA7C99508A3EE9B52B
The current Wikipedia article cites this paper:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2859693/#R32
Which in turns cites this paper as its source:
http://www.nature.com/nrm/journal/v4/n5/full/nrm1103.html#B1
Which says:  "Sphingosine was named in 1884 after the Greek mythological creature, the Sphinx, because of its enigmatic nature" and cites:
Thudichum, J. L. W. A Treatise on the Chemical Constitution of Brain. 149 (Bailliere, Tindall and Cox, London, 1884).
This latter one, I don't have access to.
Any thoughts?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexmorgan (talk • contribs) 16:44, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Named after the Sphinx? 

message: No way. To be consistent, you would have to reorganize all of Wikipedia. Imagine trying to merge diabetes into glucose.  Metzenberg (talk) 11:46, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to merge [[Sphingolipidoses]] into Sphingolipid 

message: Phosphorylcholine is NOT linked to ceramide with an ether link, but an ester one. --kupirijo (talk) 23:39, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ester not ether 

message: This article is not general for all sphingolipids. For example, the figure at the top depicting sphingosine and the statement that ceramides "consist simply of a fatty acid chain attached through an amide linkage to sphingosine" are not true for yeast, which use sphinganine instead of sphingosine.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.253.238.102 (talk) 16:04, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be clear when focusing on human biochemistry
Talk:Diospyros nigra

message: I have to question the NPOV for the statement "Black Sapote is one of Mexico's greatest gems."  Also, when are they in season?24.83.178.11 14:44, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

message: I'm confused about Diospyros nigra. According to ITIS (Integrated Taxonomic Information System) there is no such name and the correct name should be Diospyros digyna  Jacq.
https://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=505968#null  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:5F:6E22:1B40:4589:4BF8:28C1:1F53 (talk) 21:45, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct scientific name should be Diospyros digyna 

message: Is this the same as Diospyros digyna? It seems to be called that a lot online, even by seed retailers, but looking up that name didn't even show this Wikipedia page until adding "Wikipedia." Atlas Obscura lists it as an alternate name. 
Should we add a redirect? 
What's the official name?  
Ed: It's attested as "nigra" in books as early as "The Silva of North AmericaA Description of the Trees which Grow Naturally in North America Exclusive of Mexico Volume 14" By Charles Sprague Sargent in 1891 and "A Monograph of Ebenaceae" by William Philip Hiern in 1873.  Also "Publications - Bureau of Government Laboratories Volumes 1-10" by Philippines. Bureau of Government Laboratories in 1904.
Tabbycatlove (talk) 16:24, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes they are equivalent, Diospyros digyna is a synonym of the accepted/official name Diospyros nigra. There is already a redirect in place from Diospyros digyna. Declangi (talk) 02:38, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real name..?  

message: — Assignment last updated by Danibanani3 (talk) 17:30, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Composition I - Writing Wikipedia
Talk:Hippo Press

message: According to the article in the daily express' final daily issue , the express, the hippo and the oxx are all published by "Quality of Life Publications." There is no listing for a company of that name in New Hampshire, but there is a HippoPress. Anyone have any information, or is there information in the Hippo's masthead? Their Web site has no useful information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by NhInsideWriter (talk • contribs) 00:54, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The paper has always been published by a company known as "Hippo Press" until very recently. There was no announcement I'm aware of that the company's name has changed, but it is indeed listed as "Quality of Life Publications" now. This needs more (or SOME) verification, including when this change happened, before changing the name or any other data here in this article. - Nhprman 17:21, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: FWIW, the March 20-26, 2008, Hippo Press has a Media Audit on page two that says it "is published by HippoPress LLC" - DavidWBrooks (talk) 18:36, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality of Life Publications?
Talk:Myanmar–English Dictionary

message: Head project  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.4.64.12 (talk) 03:34, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that is a suggestion to insert a head in lead on the MLC itself which redirects here? A fork might be advisable. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:38, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Head Project

message: The dictionary does not use the MLC Transcription System, it uses a phonetic transcription, while the MLCTS is an orthographic transliteration. For example,   "city" is transliterated mrui. in the MLCTS but /mjou./ in the Dictionary. Angr (talk) 11:05, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  MLC Transcription System 

message: ဘာလုပ်နေလဲ 2400:AC40:609:63F9:8C54:8F73:E492:A313 (talk) 09:44, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ဘာလုပ်နေလဲ
Template talk:History of Brandenburg and Prussia

message: Based on drafts at Wikipedia:WikiProject Prussia/Template:History of Prussia. Olessi 14:52, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Ok, this land (Prussia, or however one called it during the times) went through many languages, religions and ethnicity changes. If Old Prussians are included (i.e. non-Germanic peoples), then why does one leave the empty place at the bottom of the template, where it should be partitioned between Russia (Kaliningrad Oblast), Poland and Lithuania (Memelland)? If only territories with the mainly German-speaking peoples are included in this template, then the Old Prussians must be left out.
On the other hand, people did not disappear overnight after the government changed and in the past people rather intermixed and so on rather than massive deportations and world wars of the current ages. People learnt new languages, immigrated/emigrated and so on, also diseases played much greater role than now. Only the 19th century end, 20th century produced true nationalism in this area, in my opinion, but before people somehow lived together inspite of religious/ethnic (whatever "ethnicity" could mean)/linguistic differences.
In my opinion, this region was a significant cultural center for all four nations/ethnicities/languages: German/Germans(Germanic) (from the 12-14th century), Russian/Russians (only later, 20th century 2nd half mainly), Polish/Polish, Lithuanian/Lithuanians (once they replaced Prussians and their language) (and Baltic people, like Old Prussians). Therefore, the empty places should be filled with the corresponding places of nowadays. In a sense, this place was a melting pot till nationalism came, in my opinion.
Kazkaskazkasako (talk) 17:52, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: A suggestion: include the current RU/PL/LT territories (or their parts) or exclude Old Prussians (if one makes this template only Germanic)
Talk:Germ cell

message: So how many cell generations are there in the germ line per human or other animal generation? -- 92.229.177.182 (talk) 10:04, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many generations? 

message: this reads like its drafted directly from the pages of a scientific encyclopedia.  it is very well scripted and presented, and someone has the nerve to say that its too technical?
unfortunately, not everyone realizes that scientific dialogue is generally complex.  this is one of the best pages on wiki, if it is in fact an originally compiled document.  that would be what i would question: not its complexity, but its originality versus plagiarism!
anyone else with me on that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Proud kraut (talk • contribs) 04:32, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  this reads like an encyclopedia 

message: After the initial couple paragraphs, I would like to add this:
It is speculated that induction was the ancestral mechanism, and that the preformistic, or inheritance, mechanism of germ cell establishment arose from convergent evolution. There are several key differences between these two mechanisms that may provide reasoning for the evolution of germ plasm inheritance. One difference is that typically inheritance occurs almost immediately during development (around the blastoderm stage) while induction typically does not occur until gastrulation. As germ cells are quiescent and therefore not dividing, they are not susceptible to mutation. Since the germ cell lineage is not established right away by induction, there is a higher chance for mutation to occur before the cells are specified. Mutation rate data is available that indicates a higher rate of germ line mutations in mice and humans, species which undergo induction, than in C. elegans and Drosophila melanogaster, species which undergo inheritance. A lower mutation rate would be selected for, which is one possible reason for the convergent evolution of the germ plasm.
Elemp46 (talk) 23:28, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible addition to the Specification section
Talk:Sunil (Hindu name)

message: Sunil is also the brand name of a laundry detergent in the Netherlands. I really think this ought to be mentioned.
:and Germany! 194.80.106.135 (talk) 14:59, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

message: Hopefully all the listed Sunils are famous ones LOL! 194.80.106.135 14:37, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Sunils 

message: sunil is the vastness of pleasure,kindness,holyness ,etc.  that can'nt be comprehended......it is a pool where everyone has a stake to love and be loved.It will give you the infinite and eternal happiness.
This name coincides with 'SAC-CHID-ANAND'.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.169.132.126 (talk) 06:08, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  sunil signifies .... something unconcievable 

message: We do have a list of quite a few Georges though, and all people on the list that was previously added had wiki articles/met WP:N.  Perhaps the list belongs? Dgtljunglist (talk) 22:48, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of famous people
Talk:Robert Polidori

message: This section needs to be rewritten or removed due to misinformation or content errors. Reason 1: there were no people/dead bodies in the printed or exhibited images "After the Flood". Reason 2: the Katrina image was used by a nonprofit and not commercially. It also doesn't conform to Wikipedia standards for "Controversy" which is by definition means "disagreement, typically when prolonged, public, and heated". And it does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for reliable sources as blogs are not published information sources and many of the referred blog's are no longer up. HeatherBlack (talk) 17:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: "Controversy"

message: Please note I removed the Controversy section, but in "Equipment and Approach" added Alec Soth's blog as a reference for the debate on "unpeopled" images and kept MacCash's blog as a criticism of use of a "Katrinia" image in anti-smoking ad. HeatherBlack (talk) 19:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: "Updated entry"
Talk:Cassandra Willoughby, Duchess of Chandos

message: I have modified the article to make it more factually accurate and have given two more recent and up to date sources for verification purposes. There is also a good new general account in Oxford New Dictionary of National Biography.
I would like to be able to categorize and link this article with others but I can't follow how to do this. Can you explain in simple layperson's terms, please?
Rosemary
Mre2 15:18, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Playboy UK

message: I'm not sure why this page is up for speedy deletion. I'm not advertising anything on here, there is no lewd language or pornographic material, i'm simply trying to put in an entry for 'Playboy UK', so we can sit alongside the 'Playboy' entry that our US counterparts have successfully enetered into wikipedia.
It was probably up for speedy deletion because you should have read how to create and edit articles for Wikipedia before you went and did it.  There were more mistakes than non-mistakes in the article.  I've corrected many of them.  And please sign your talk page posts. Ayengar 20:45, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion
Talk:Ocean Conservancy

message: I removed the Board of Directors section, that information is readily available at their website (to which I added a link) plus it will always be kept up-to-date there.  Likewise I took out the section with the 2010 budget.  Rissa, Guild of Copy Editors  (talk) 03:43, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Board of directors 

message: The criticism section looks very bare bones. I'm worried that without a more fleshed out criticism section (and with the lengthy list of accomplishments), this article leans towards bias/promotionalism. Toad02 (talk) 19:47, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism looks very bare bones 

message: Almost every source I have been able to check has not existed or did not support the claim it was being used to support. I have nor read through all sources (some aren't links as well), but I have extreme doubts about the quality of the sources. Additionally, after I cut out the bad citations, many sections are now supported only by self published sources. Toad02 (talk) 14:39, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now checked every link on this page. The vast majority were errors, redirects to nothing, or did not support what they were being used to support. I cannot check the non-web sources, but I have serious doubts as to their validity. There is also a chance that this massive amount of errors is some network issue, so I would appreciate an editor who did not add them to check over some of the ones I deleted. Toad02 (talk) 16:09, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

text: This also leads me to questions about the bias of this page. Almost all of the faulty citation supported the organization directly, and none of it was used for criticism. Although it was likely just a series of mistakes, the sheer volume of false information makes me wonder. Toad02 (talk) 16:15, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

text: I've deleted most material with these erroneous citations. If you believe it should be tagged with citation needed instead, feel free to make that revert before discussing it on the talk page (I won't tag you for edit warring of whatever). Toad02 (talk) 17:42, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Smart casual

message: We should absolutely merge this article with business casual, as it appears to be nothing more than a British variant of the phrase. This article, which is used as a reference, even explicitly states that "smart casual" refers to what Americans call "business casual". Berserk798 (talk) 04:12, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, a different reference makes a distinction by saying that "smart casual" is "business casual" but worn in a non-work setting, although the BBC article clearly refers to it as a business dress code. I still believe the two belong in the same article and a merger would be appropriate. Berserk798 (talk) 04:18, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please see renewed such nomination here: Talk:Business casual#Merge with smart casual?. PPEMES (talk) 13:08, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: "Formality is subjective, and in some places, the above would describe 'casual', with smart casual requiring a jacket and tie."
Haha really? On what planet is a man wearing dress pants, dress shoes, dress socks, dress shirt and a jacket and tie considered by anyone to be dressed casually (even "smart" casually)? That sounds like full businesswear of the kind found in a legal or financial office. Torka1 (talk) 11:51, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a negative. Please see formal wear for formal dress attire. For suits level, please see informal wear. Else, see casual. Smart casual is casual when elements of the suit, i.e. informal wear, is still present. PPEMES (talk) 12:52, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see any of you providing any sources to back up your versions of it. The critical point is that the definitions of these terms change over time and by geography anyway, so it's pointless bickering as though there's a precise definition. Largoplazo (talk) 21:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seriously? 

message: Please see: Talk:Business casual#Merge with smart casual?. Chicbyaccident (talk) 19:56, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion closed with no support for merge. Toddst1 (talk) 17:01, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consideration of merge from [[business casual]] 

message: Since it omitted elements specific to women's smart casual dress, the list of elements listed in the lead paragraph were obviously for men, so I've annotated it as such. There needs to be a corresponding list for women. Largoplazo (talk) 21:34, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women's version
Talk:Allen Boothroyd

message: I removed a chunk of text that was pretty much lifted word-for-word from this press release. Yes, it is a press release, but that doesn't mean we can use it as GFDL. Loganberry (Talk) 15:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text removed 

message: Just a heads up - there's a question about this article at WP:BLPN. Thanks --sparkl!sm  hey! 15:40, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice to editors
Talk:Pacific Press Publishing Association

message: Someone want to explain why the sex discrimination part is notable, much less notable enough to go at the head of the article?  If a bank had dealt with two sex discrimination charges, would that go at the top of its article?
At the very least, it's in the wrong part of the article.  Please fix.  (NorthernFalcon (talk) 05:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The sparse and unsourced article on the Spanish publication El Centinela (Adventist magazine) may as well be rolled into this article to provide some actual detail on the publications that this publishing house is actually believed to be responsible for producing. Iskandar323 (talk) 18:10, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from: [[El Centinela (Adventist magazine)]]
Wikipedia talk:Forum for Encyclopedic Standards/Quality Management Project

message: I have been observing the development of the Philosophy article for the last 3 months, as well
as the featured articles, inorder to get at the heart of the matter of what and how we come to arrive at Quality in the context of Encyclopedic Standards or the process of creating quality artilces. I will make some tentative proposals in regards to this, that I hope will move this project forward. These may sound lame, but I hope they help somehow in laying a foundation.
1. quality is an attribute or property of something (this is intended to be practical rather than deeply metaphysical)
2. people either have an ability to recognize it, or an ability to acquire the ability to recognize it, or they don't
Richiar 00:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening of project 

message: I have begun to add definitions of "Quality Management" to the main page and will be adding more material soon. Richiar 02:43, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definitions of Quality Manangement
Category talk:Regionalist parties

message: I suggest that the term 'regionalist' is itself POV. The members of these groups often consider them to be nations/countries, not regions. --MacRusgail 15:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, you've touched on another problem here, namely those who are "regionalists" but not nationalists... --MacRusgail 17:54, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Freedom Park (Atlanta, Georgia)

message: This article does not address when the parkway got its name, and why it was named as such.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.17.112.63 (talk) 04:46, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. It would be nice to do some research and see that important addition. Opinenow (talk) 06:00, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: The name of this article should be changed to reflect the subject name change, to John Lewis Freedom Parkway. --2600:1700:FDF1:1FC0:65F1:6D63:967:C1A7 (talk) 20:44, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  name change 