lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Russian flags

message: Missing all pre-petrine banners including banner of Tsar of Moscow (Ivan IV banner), banners of Russian principalities etc.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.165.173.131 (talk) 19:41, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very incomplete list 

message: The red flag with the gold star was adopted by presidential decree as the flag for the Russian Army and not used only in commemorative occasions.  Can someone shed light in on the date this was made?
Marky 14:46, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commemorative flag 

message: http://www.geneva.mid.ru/0img/MFA_flag.jpg Kaihsu (talk) 17:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  flag of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs 

message: Todas as bandeiras da russua 2804:29B8:5192:550:C557:EED:1BF5:575D (talk) 22:59, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russia
Category talk:Rivers and valleys of the Peak District

message: Currently excluding canals from this category. Ones of recreational interest can be placed under 'Visitor attractions of the Peak District'; others can be placed under the general category 'Peak District'. Espresso Addict 14:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Hi just to let you all know, I have changed the description for this category so that only places within the National park and close proximity can be added to it. This has been done after discussion in Talk:Peak District in order to avoid adding places which are too far from the region, which may confuse and mislead some people as a result. Broman178 (talk) 08:55, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category description change
Talk:HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht

message: This school is not a university according to the Dutch law, but an HBO (higher professional school), so I removed the category link. The requirement of the category with the Dutch universities is: This category contains a list of the universities, not HBO's. --145.107.0.131 14:53, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Hanze University of Applied Sciences

message: This school is not a university according to the Dutch law, but an HBO (higher professional school), so I removed the category link. The requirement of the category with the Dutch universities is: There are two kinds of institutions of higher education in The Netherlands: universities (universiteiten) and schools for professional education (HBO's or hogescholen). This category contains a list of the universities.--145.107.0.131 14:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Universities of Applied Science are indeed professional education schools; this is the reason the school is known under the name Hanzehogeschool in Dutch. You will find several other such universities of applied science throughout the Netherlands, though they may not be called universiteit in Dutch for the reason you named. While the description of the school may be correct in English, it is misleading to categorize it under "universities", and hence this category has been removed. — Stimpy talk 14:59, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Your question is based on incorrect information. Many universities in the English-speaking world are not allowed to grant PhD-degrees. gidonb (talk) 21:53, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: moved to Hanze University Groningen. Google Scholar search also supports this as being the common name. Favonian (talk) 14:38, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Please refer to the official Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen website, www.hanzegroningen.eu, for proof of the aformentioned name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitchdroge (talk • contribs) 12:28, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

text: I have removed Groningen from the name as there is no other Hanze University of Applied Sciences elsewhere and the name without "Groningen" is commonly used (for example: http://www.eurogates.nl/news/a/3622/welcoming-day-hanze-uas-groningen/). gidonb (talk) 17:57, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:New York Life Insurance Company

message: I would like to do a withdrawal 68.134.159.63 (talk) 21:56, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Withdrawal 

message: Hello! I'm here to make requests as part of my work with Beutler Ink, on behalf of our client New York Life Insurance Company to seek updates to this article. I've added my conflict of interest disclosure to the banner above, and will not directly edit this article, instead opting to let volunteer editors implement appropriate changes on my behalf. 
*I'm requesting the CEO in the Infobox be updated from Ted Mathas to the current CEO, Craig DeSanto. The change is verified by this article from The Wall Street Journal.
Thanks so much for taking the time to review this request. If you have any questions at all, please feel free to reach out here or on my Talk page. Cheers! BINK Robin (talk) 20:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: , I see you helped out with requests for this article in the past. If you're available, would you be willing to review this change? Thanks! BINK Robin (talk) 17:23, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  I used a source that supported that the transition already happened, versus it just being announced in November. Please check out the Helpout section at Wikipedia:Community portal to see ways you can contribute in exchange for us helping you. That will make it more likely that people will help in the future. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 20:32, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks so much for taking care of that! And I certainly understand your choice to use a source from after the transition happened. I appreciate your suggestion and insight. We're always thinking of ways we can contribute to the encyclopedia, while being mindful of not creating any ambiguity with our activity. Some team members do have personal accounts that they use for volunteer editing, and we are active in Wikimedia circles offline, but we like making a clear distinction between work that is paid and work that is not. Thanks again for your assistance. Cheers, BINK Robin (talk) 19:48, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CEO update
Talk:Chiques Creek

message: After I started this article I found an earlier stub by User:RM at Chickie's Creek with the bridge information, but it was smaller than 1000 characters and is now a redirect. Please see its page history for the three edits made to it before the redirect. Ruhrfisch 14:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Utrecht School of the Arts

message: This school is not a university according to the Dutch law, but an HBO (higher professional school), so I removed the category link. The requirement of the category with the Dutch universities is: There are two kinds of institutions of higher education in The Netherlands: universities (universiteiten) and schools for professional education (HBO's or hogescholen). This category contains a list of the universities.--145.107.0.131 14:57, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In English we use the terms universities and colleges, but HKU is a (vocational) university as it includes a graduate school. gidonb (talk) 01:39, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't this article be in the university-stub instead of the struct-stub? It isn't a building, it is an educational institution as mentioned above. --Løde 08:06, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In 2009 it is not a stub at all. Changed to start. gidonb (talk) 01:37, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub cat 

message: This article is a bit too similar to the introductory texts on the schools webpage. May-be some information on valuations from outside or something along this line would not hurt.90.190.225.121 (talk) 10:30, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  One-sided? 

message: Carillion School was merged with Utrecht School 30 years ago.  No need for separate article. Rogermx (talk) 23:12, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 21:39, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Netherlands Carillon School]]
Talk:Del's

message: 36 states wow-how popular is it in other places in comparison to RI--158.123.153.254 15:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The result of the discussion was merge. Non-admin closure by Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 05:33, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: Why was this merged to "Del's," when the merge proposal clearly states "I support merging Dels into Del's Lemonade"? Also, the official site says at the top bar, "Del's Lemonade," not "Del's." Badagnani (talk) 05:42, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong merge 

message: This article stated that Del's is a "genericized trademark."  The term "genericized trademark" has a specific legal meaning -- that the word or phrase has lost its meaning as a source identifier and now serves merely as the name of the product itself (e.g., cellophane, escalator, etc.).  "Del's" with the lemon logo is a federally registered trademark in good standing.  "Del's" may be highly identified with frozen lemonade or synonymous with it, but I doubt I could set up shop with the Del's name out front in R.I. and sell frozen lemonade.  Therefore, this is a misuse of the legal term.  Given the distinction, I have changed the reference so that it says that "Del's is synonymous with frozen lemonade. I am a trademark lawyer, but I do not do any kind of legal work for Del's. Gsshatan (talk) 23:24, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Del's is not a "genericized trademark"
Talk:Dragon Zakura

message: Per WP:Anime guidelines, the lede needs to be rewritten to identify the manga as the original form, followed by the drama as an adaptation. —Quasirandom 18:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Charles E. Bennett (politician)

message: The article currently includes the following line:
:He resigned in March 1942 to join the United States Army and served with distinction in New Guinea as a guerrilla fighter during the Japanese occupation of the Philippines.
Maybe I'm missing something, but I can't tell from this whether he served on New Guinea, the Philippines, or both. 76.106.149.108 (talk) 18:58, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where did he serve in WWII? 
Talk:Document 12-571-3570

message: Spacefacts.de, which lists quite extensively the astronauts trainees, has no trainee named Pierre Kohler http://www.spacefacts.de/english/bio_cand.htm. Is this another hoax ? Hektor 15:09, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think so. May be the reason is to give him some reputation. --Brand спойт 12:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Former trainee

message: The page says this document was created by Kohler for his book. However, the snopes.com page linked to in the article  suggests that it was floating around the Internet for years -- long before there was actually an STS-75 -- and that Kohler was taken in by it. I'm not saying that we should take snopes as gospel, but do we have any evidence that Kohler concocted this thing himself? --Jmeisen (talk) 06:48, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Created by Kohler?

message: Is this document really properly described as a hoax?  First publication in alt.sex certainly doesn't give it much authority, and publication half a decade before STS-75 was launched is a big give-away that it was written as fiction.  We may need some other way of talking about such documents -- it was the continued redistribution of this document, stripped of any trace of where it was first found, that allowed it to serve as a hoax?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.196.125.108 (talk) 03:13, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hoax?

message: "The descriptions of sex are further evidence that it is a hoax because there were no women aboard STS-75."
Because only a man and a woman can have sex, right? I am considering changing "sex" to "vaginal intercourse" but I don't know if this would properly apply to the document (i.e. is vaginal intercourse described as such in the document?). Another option may be to remove the entire sentence. Bobber0001 (talk) 03:47, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Read the original document please, as cited in footnote 2.  The document repeatedly refers to such things as "the conventional approach to marital relationships" and at one point defines this as "(sometimes described as the missionary approach)". Douglas W. Jones (talk) 13:38, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I just fixed it. See my edit summary. --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 12:00, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is not the year 1263.
Talk:List of topics related to π

message: Why have a list of topics when we already have a notion of a category?  Asteron 15:10, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because categories are vastly inferior to topics lists. Michael Hardy 19:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Um...... to be a little bit more specific: please look at list of mathematics lists and some of the longer lists to which it links.  The list of mathematics lists is a magnificent thing; you could spend a long time exploring it. Michael Hardy 19:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Organized lists with some information is fine but this article is nothing more than an alphabeticle listing.  This could be done with a category and would not require maintanence. Ohh well. Asteron 19:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why a list?

message: On the Lists of mathematics topics, this was the only one with a non-Latin character in the title. It is unconventional to use a math symbol in a title even when that symbol is universally understood. It's Three Blind Mice, not "3 Blind Mice", a Dirac delta function, not a δ function, and so forth. In this case, "pi" is far more common in general usage than is "". CNN uses "pi", the BBC uses "pi", and the New York Times uses "pi". Math journals can go either way. Check here and here for journal articles with "pi" in their titles. Kauffner (talk) 04:58, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This was a contentious move and it wasn't properly discussed. At WT:WPM there is a clear consensus against your moves, so I will undo this one. Don't do it again without prior consensus from a formal WP:RM discussion. Hans Adler 08:11, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

text: Actually no, I couldn't do it because of the stupid title blacklist. I will ask an admin. Hans Adler 08:14, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move from "{{pi}}" to "pi" 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Pi which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 13:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:51st Street/53rd Street - Lexington Avenue (New York City Subway)

message: What is the best approach to addressing the smell in the station? The walkway from the downtown 6 to the E is the consensus pick for foulest smelling in the NYC subway system. Rusty 00:21, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whose consensus? Unless it can be referenced, we shouldn't address it at all. Larry V (talk | contribs) 02:51, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Smell

message: The problem here is that it's Lexington Av-53 St on the IND and 51 Street on the IRT. Again, if it's only one passageway, maybe it should be split. --NE2 20:11, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We can't really reconcile this with a verified name. I have never seen the two stations referred to in one breath. Ever. It's "Lexington Avenue" (or "Lex–53") and "51st Street"—always separate. Larry V (talk | e-mail) 20:30, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Well of course it would. The IRT station is named 51st Street. Pacific Coast Highway {talk • contribs} 00:00, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The IRT exit signs probably say "51 STREET STATION — IRT LEXINGTON AVENUE LINE" or something like that. This wouldn't count for anything, because the reference to "Lexington Avenue" is for the line, not the station. Larry V (talk | e-mail) 00:16, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming
Talk:Five o'clock shadow

message: I would like to know the history... who coined the phrase, circa, a most brilliant description....71.196.114.76 (talk)jr71.196.114.76 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 04:38, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

message: I had no idea this was even a beard.  As I understood it, a 5 o'clock shadow was a shadow that appears directly underneath you such as the circular shaped shadows in bugs bunny cartoons that do not change shape regardless of where the character goes.Ziiv 15:11, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. BirdValiant 03:00, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I thought a 5 o'clock shadow was a shadow 

message: This article would benefit from a photo. Gordeonbleu 19:57, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 

message: I thought it was called such because Chuck Norris shaves at 4:59. :/ James Callahan 14:08, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ? 

message: It's a very funny English expression ;) Nbuda (talk) 20:59, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow
Talk:Kerri Chandler

message: Kerri Chandler is well respected and beloved in the house community. From classics as "Inspiration", to "Can't You See?", to "Isis", to his riveting remix of Nina Simone's "See Line Woman", and many more, he embodies the spirit of house music. 208.176.169.89 (talk) 14:57, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Kerri Chandler is a genius
Talk:Nobuta wo Produce

message: This article shouldn't be using the animanga infobox since that infobox was specifically designed for anime and manga articles. --Farix (Talk) 01:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I am planning of changing the infobox because of that reason. Don't worry, I'll work on it tomorrow after finishing some things. But, if you (or someone) want to do it, please go ahead. Eugh jei ♥ Kaorin 07:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Eugh jei ♥ Kaorin 07:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:Hurricane Iris (1995)

message: Copyedit, expand, remove useless things (trivia is called trivia for a reason). There's more info in the NHC archives which should be used. Try and add more to the storm history; it was a long lived storm, and there's probably enough between the TCR and the discussions to have at least three paragraphs. Hurricanehink (talk) 21:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, some things need more explanation. The infobox, as well as other places, say the hurricane killed four, though you say the hurricane killed four in Martinique and one in Guadeloupe. Hurricanehink (talk) 21:19, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The trivia section is completely unsourced. I suggest you remove it. Those sources you added don't qualify as sources, as they don't say the info happened. No original research. Articles may not contain any previously unpublished arguments, concepts, data, ideas, statements, or theories.  Hurricanehink (talk) 14:56, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Then why Tropical Storm Otto (2004) article have a triva  which is unsourced. Storm05 15:01, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Have tagged the relevant sentence for citation. – Chacor 15:03, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: Not sure why the cleanup tag is there, but I think the article needs to be spell checked for many parts (I think it's spelt "simultaneous"), and a bit more on storm history. That's all I can find. RaNdOm26 15:47, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cleanup = needs copyediting. Everything. Spelling, grammar, wikification, metrification, etc. – Chacor 15:54, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: General copy-editing completed, including metrification and wikilink editing. I have taken the liberty of removing the cleanup tag. -- wacko2 05:06, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup?
Talk:Engineering geology

message: This merge discussion is redundantGeohumphrey 17:57, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A merge discussion already exists on the Geotechnical Engineering discussion.  Lets not make these merge discussion messy by having more than one at a time.Geohumphrey 17:43, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge [[Geotechnics]] with Geological Engineering

message: It has been suggested by user User:Kku that Geoengineering be merged into this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aszilagyi (talk • contribs) 15:40, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that geoengineering is an ambiguous term. The page Geoengineering should be a disambiguation page pointing to Climate engineering on one hand and Geotechnical engineering and/or Engineering geology on the other. I am not sure whether the current contents of the Geoengineering article contains anything that should be merged into Engineering geology. Please help resolve this. Aszilagyi (talk) 15:55, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it's questionable to merge any of this non-referenced content. Having just disambiguated nearly one-hundred pages by mostly piping links as geoengineering, i.e., geoengineering, I find that climate engineering is the de facto primary topic for "geoengineering" on Wikipedia, if not in common usage by the average person in the real world. It appears that here, in the less common usage, "geoengineering" may be an interdisciplinary field which combines geotechnical engineering (engineering) and engineering geology (science). Thus, it may not be appropriate to copy the content to either this article or the geo(technical)engineering article. I'm going to move it to the talk page, until someone can clear up the confusion as to exactly what "geoengineering" means, when it doesn't refer to dealing with the climate. Wbm1058 (talk) 18:03, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

text: Aha. Hmm, see . So why has  redirected to Geotechnical engineering since 2009? I see. Here is the 16:54, 28 August 2009 version of , just before that was redirected to Geotechnical engineering. Wbm1058 (talk) 18:33, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Geoengineering]] into [[Engineering geology]]
Talk:Pschitt

message: Is it piss? is it shit? It should make it's mind up! <B>Troubleshooter</B> 15:21, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: At the date of this comment, the two external links for Pschitt are out of date.
*The Neptune Group link is broken and redirects to the Groupe Castel home page www.groupe-castel.com.   The site has versions in a range of languages, and none of them had a page of Pschitt.
The Saphy Group seems to now administer Neptune Group products.  However the product listing of the group - at http://www.uk.saphy-export.com/ - does not seem to list any kind of Pschitt!.
*The "Official Web Site" domain name (www.pschitt.fr) is now occupied by a placeholder.  Bids are invited to purchase Pschitt.
I have therefore removed both of the links.Twistlethrop (talk) 18:41, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: As with life in general, there are several product names that include Pschitt.
I found:
*The Garancia brand's "Pschitt Magique New Skin". http://www.garancia-beauty.com/english/eng-pschitt_magique-acc.php.
*ByTerry's lip gloss "Mandarina Pschitt" http://www.strawberrynet.com/makeup/by-terry/gloss-delectation-----07-mandarina/114514/.
That's only two, and there may be other kinds of Pschitt. Should  the article be expanded to include them, or should there be a separate Pschitt for each kind? Twistlethrop (talk) 18:44, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Pschitt