Talk:1995 Atlantic hurricane season

message: Another year, another set of images.
*Hurricane Allison
*Tropical Storm Barry
*Tropical Storm Chantal
*Tropical Storm Dean
*Hurricane Felix
*Tropical Storm Gabrielle
*Hurricane Humberto
*Hurricane Iris
*Tropical Storm Jerry
*Tropical Storm Karen
*Hurricane Noel
*Tropical Storm Pablo
*Tropical Storm Sebastien
*Hurricane Tanya
Will finish later. Too many to do. Hurricanehink 01:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added Pablo. Hurricanehink 00:46, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added Noel. And now I have to go. Ugh, if I could only finish now... Hurricanehink 15:38, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Almost done. Hurricanehink 17:27, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done... finally. Hurricanehink 22:03, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images of each storm 

message: Content is fairly complete, but the article is lacking sources, wording is poor in some places, and the pictures haven't been added yet. Jdorje 08:30, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: The tanya section makes little sense.  There's argument about whether the storm was a Category 1 or a Category 3 hurricane when it hit "the island".  What island?  The only land affected was the Azores islands, while Tanya was extratropical and had gale-force winds. — jdorje (talk) 06:32, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Category 3 statement has no sources. The unofficial reading part was a good idea, but I think it should be removed. Hurricanehink 13:44, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tanya 

message: 1995 is the 3rd most active season in history with many notable storms.Dont you think this page deserves a set of small infoboxes?HurricaneCraze32 23:14, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you mean actual infoboxes or small infoboxes used in 2004 and 2005? Hurricanehink 19:54, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Small ones and thats 2002-2005.HurricaneCraze32 20:41, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. That's not a bad idea. Hurricanehink 01:16, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It does well-when i get home from my dad's company i can start.If everyone agrees that is..I made Allison as an example.HurricaneCraze32 01:18, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought we agreed we were going to use a table format for season statistics, rather than the infobox format? — jdorje (talk) 06:59, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The results of the discussion was rather ambiguous, so it could go either way. I personally like the table format, so when you finish the templates, someone could tablize everything. Hurricanehink 00:55, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Article links-i have an easier way-to save space-link the titles.HurricaneCraze32 23:59, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Small infoboxes for page

message: I removed the following table from the article. I'm not sure of its purpose, so I'll just put it here for now. It's merely a table of the most active seasons, which can easily be said in words. Hurricanehink (talk) 02:07, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unneeded table 

message: According to Jack Beven's summaries there was a possible (sub)tropical storm with approximate peak winds of 45kts located to the S of Nova Scotia and E of Virginia - visible in this GIBBS image.--Nilfanion (talk) 21:46, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool, but can we ut in it? →Cyclone1→ 23:56, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ut in it? Do you mean put IT in?Mitchazenia(8600+edits) 00:17, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can source it, sure, you could put it in an other storms section. Hurricanehink (talk) 01:21, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Give me some time and I'll get Jack Beven's info out...--Nilfanion (talk) 11:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible storm 

message: Here's a good site regarding why the season was so active. Some of that should probably be added. Looking at the article as a whole, we might be able to do a redo of 2005. Yes, I am talking about having articles for all storms and having a season summary, not a list of storms. I don't know, maybe I'm foolish and shouldn't even think of it, but it could potentially work. Thoughts? Hurricanehink (talk) 22:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Right now, this is the season I am most heavily targetting for new articles. I don't think the 2005 format should be used; it should be modelled after 2003 and 2004 as they were not a whole lot less active; 2005 was "off the charts" and deserves special treatment. CrazyC83 02:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's next? 

message: I think the new style for the season format should be used for 1995. Clarifying what I am saying, I would like to but the layout for the 1995 season as the summary for June-November, then create a separate article, List of storms in the 1995 Atlantic hurricane season. View the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season page and List of storms in the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season for reference. I would like to see this because the format it is intended for extremely active seasons, and 1995 just so happens to be one, although people have recently gone crazy and made this for 1994 and most years in the 2000's, even 2006 and 2009. So because of the extreme amounts of tropical activity, I believe that the 1995 Atlantic hurricane season deserves this special format. I have also noticed that most of the seasons with this formation end up as a Featured Article, while other seasons don't, such as 2000, 2004, and 2008, although I also plan on pushing the format for those three seasons.--12george1 (talk) 15:40, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good luck with that. Should we do the same with the PHS's? YE  Tropical Cyclone 17:04, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

text: Currently I am working on it for 1995 in a sandbox, but I am only up to Chantal at the moment.--12george1 (talk) 17:11, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good. I personally feel there is a major redundancy issue when having the new style, the list article, as well as a timeline, not to mention the numerous articles. Basically it is a content fork just so there can be the old style and new style. That said, I'll take my rant elsewhere, but I agree with 1995 getting the new format. Be sure to emphasize monthly records and notable events within the season (for example, the August paragraph should begin by mentioning there being four named storms at the same time, as well as there being three hurricanes at the same time). Hurricanehink (talk) 19:22, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

text: Also, anyone is welcome to help me piece this thing together, click here and start editing if you desire. Believe me, this is a lot of work and it should probably qualify at least as a c-class article when the new format is posted on the main 1995 AHS article. If is lower than c-class, there would be no reason to do this since it would only degrade the article quality.--12george1 (talk) 04:13, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New style season format 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 1995 Atlantic hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.europarl.europa.eu/dg7/calendrier/data/pv_adopt/en/text/951116EN.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131126081212/http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/general/lib/lib1/nhclib/mwreviews/1995.pdf to http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/general/lib/lib1/nhclib/mwreviews/1995.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 1995 Atlantic hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080623112207/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/dg7/calendrier/data/pv_adopt/en/text/951116EN.htm to http://www.europarl.europa.eu/dg7/calendrier/data/pv_adopt/en/text/951116EN.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080623112207/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/dg7/calendrier/data/pv_adopt/en/text/951116EN.htm to http://www.europarl.europa.eu/dg7/calendrier/data/pv_adopt/en/text/951116EN.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:01, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tropcial Storm Sebastien (1995). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  CycloneYoris talk! 17:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Tropcial Storm Sebastien (1995)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]