Talk:Orders of magnitude (temperature)

message: This seems to be the only page on the internet using prefixes larger than "yotta" (10^24), all other sources suggest that the widely accepted range of SI prefixes ends at that point.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.47.106.228 (talk) 04:05, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: SI Prefixes

message: Considering plank temperature is supposed to be the hottest temeprature that can be physically possible, why are there some entries as many as 3 order of magnitude higher? Rhialto 02:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Planck temperature corresponds with the Planck mass-energy of two bodies whose two level separations by gravital potential is equal to the wavelength of that potential.  As gravity is rather weak, the mass of two motes and their attendant nearness must be rather strong.  At that scale resonanses between gravity and elèctricity are sharp and coherent.  It may be the greattest temperature that any body can hold with, say, elèctricity without interferent interactions, but it doesn't mean that it's the greattest possibil temperature.  Above that temperature and below that length and span, interactions are "fuzzy" or "foamy" rather than nonexistent because all the forses are involved.  There should be more energhetic harmònics yonder that scale. -lysdexia 07:38, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Planck temperature

message: List of significant temperatures is orphaned and probably shouldn't exist.  I've flagged it for merge into this page but I don't actually see any useful stuff in there that isn't already here. SteveBaker (talk) 03:41, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to Agree. Besides, as SteveBaker said, most of the info is already on this page. Adam Hillman (talk) 12:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

text: No one objected, so I redirected List of significant temperatures to this article. The edit history of the page is still there, if anyone wants to copy more temperatures from that article to this one. Philbert2.71828 22:42, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of significant temperatures merge 

message: What the heck is "extradimensional gauge freedom" supposed to be? I'm starting to think this term is made up. This article is literally the ONLY PAGE ON THE ENTIRE INTERNET with this phrase in it. Google it, there's only like 20 results all of which are asking "what the hell is that wikipedia temperature article talking about?".||bass (talk) 05:32, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It was added on 2005-11-03T05:37:21, but I've removed it and added some more  tags. -84user (talk) 10:40, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

text: At Planck temperature, two bodies will become gravitally bound and tend to shed excess internal energhy; when they are superheated, however, their mekanical energhy will become divergent or hýpervolic.  In M- or brane theory the smallest limiting dimensions become open to such a body, where otherwise it would condense, cool, and be stuck here or there.  In superstring terms, the body will become unbound to our brane, as a loop akin to the gravitòn's shape, and be keen to fare throuh other dimensions. -lysdexia 15:00, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: extradimensional gauge freedom

message: 10−30 		particular speeds bound paths to exceed size and lifetime of the universe
(see least-energy in orders of magnitude (energy))
What does this mean? 137.122.45.191 (talk) 15:19, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  what does this mean 

message: The article says "particular speeds bound paths to exceed size and lifetime of the universe
(see least-energy in orders of magnitude (energy))" as the entry for 10−30. What is this supposed to mean? The article on orders of magnitude (energy) does not mention this at all and I can't find anything more about this anywhere. 137.122.149.229 (talk) 14:25, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this entry was made up, as the only place I can find anything about it is this article and mirrors of this article, and I can't find anything more about what it is supposed to mean. 137.122.149.229 (talk) 14:24, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It was not.  At this temperature, a body's potential well is greater and its perihod longer than the univers. -lysdexia 15:00, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is "particular speeds bound paths to exceed size and lifetime of the universe"? 

message: On the planck temp page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_temperature the value is given as about 1.42*10^32 K. On this page it is cited as 14.2 million YK, which to my understanding is 14.2*10^6 *10*24 = 1.42*10^31. Worse yet, on the magnitude side it says its on the order of 10^30, which is consistent with neither of the other values. That discrepancy makes me believe the number on this page is wrong. I brought this up under the other page's talk page also. Washyleopard (talk) 13:03, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planck temp inconsistent with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_temperature 

message: This rather old Ref. is used for some hard to understand strange claims at low temperatures. Low temperatures were rather new at this time, so this source is rather outdated to this respect. So I tranferred this strange part here for discussion an likely final removal:
Everyday substances near liquid air's temperature with incipient Fermi-condensate populations result in spontaneous luminescence, loss or lack of hysteresis, inductive and capacitive electronic moments that readily adsorb or expel or float upon unlike substances:http://1911encyclopedia.org/Liquid_Gases "Liquid Gases".  Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th edition: Classic Encyclopedia. (1911, 2006)--Ulrich67 (talk) 19:14, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encyclopædia Britannica - 1911 

message: There was a "kindling point of paper" at 450C which I removed. It had a source citation but that may be bogus. There was and still is a paper entry at 450F, and Wikipedia's own Autoignition_temperature article has two sources saying paper's kindling point is 424-475F. This Slate article about the well-known "451F" temperature at which paper burns also backs this up. // 24.62.170.82 (talk) 00:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paper 450F v. 450C 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Orders of magnitude (temperature). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140913012501/http://www.antiscald.com/prevention/general_info/table.php to http://www.antiscald.com/prevention/general_info/table.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160812030844/https://www.wunderground.com/blog/weatherhistorian/hottest-reliably-measured-air-temperatures-on-earth to https://www.wunderground.com/blog/weatherhistorian/hottest-reliably-measured-air-temperatures-on-earth
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:44, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Some of the items in the list are risibly vague (and more than vaguely risible):
* Room temperature
* Food is well done
* Cake is well done
* Oven on low
And so on. These don't sit at all well with the more scientific, objective temperatures elsewhere in the list. Although it's useful IMHO to have familiar temperatures in a list like this, to balance the ones people can't really relate to, these are just far too woolly. Sorry that I don't have time to fix it right now; flagging it for someone else who may have the time later. 82.71.0.229 (talk) 14:01, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absurdly vague examples