Talk:Traceability

message: There are a lot of external links on this article, some of which I think should be removed:
*FQcode | Traceability Solutions
*Intact Consult - Consultancy and software solutions for internal and supply chain traceability
*Historic Futures Ltd - Specialists in complete end to end supply chain traceability in multiple product sectors
*TraceTracker, a leader in whole-chain traceability in the food industry
*Flexware Innovation: Traceability in manufacturing
If anyone can vouch that these are notable enough to include in this article, then I'll leave them. If not, I'll remove them in one week (16 November 2007). CoderGnome 19:31, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The links have been removed CoderGnome (talk) 04:33, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-notable external links 

message: Traceability as related to calibration is often mistakenly thought of as only pertaining to the calibration side of the measurement process.  This is not the case.  The definition provided by the "International Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in Metrology (VIM)" states "traceability [is a] property of the result of a measurement or the value of a standard...".  This definition indicates that traceability extends to the measurement result and does not stop at the calibrated instrument.  The subheading Calibration under the Traceability main heading promote this misunderstanding.  I would recommend changing the subheading from calibration to measurement.   --Bestshot (talk) 18:43, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traceability: Calibration 

message: This section contains a sentence that I believe is worded incorrectly. 
Where is says: "refers to the ability to link product documentation requirements back to stakeholders' rationales" , I believe it should say: "refers to the ability to link product requirements documentation  back to stakeholders' rationales 
I understand that the first sentence (the one currently in the article as of 7-14-10) should be interpreted as meaning "those requirements contained in the product documentation". But that is not the only way it may be read. It may also be interpreted as meaning: "The requirements to which documentation is subjected" or in other words requirements on the documentation and not documentation of the requirements. 
My suggested wording would make it more clear that "requirements" are those set on the product and not on the documentation. The documentation is that which lists the product requirements. 
I'll leave it for someone else to make the correction. I may just make the correction myself if there is no feedback on this for a few weeks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex Pascual (talk • contribs) 16:41, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Software 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Traceability. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130403154618/http://164.100.9.245/Exim/2000/NOT/NOT12/not2812.htm to http://164.100.9.245/Exim/2000/NOT/NOT12/not2812.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527133041/http://ts.nist.gov/Traceability/Policy/nist_traceability_policy-external.cfm to http://ts.nist.gov/Traceability/Policy/nist_traceability_policy-external.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:20, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jasminezapple (talk) 19:46, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA23 - Sect 201 - Thu