Template talk:CcTLD

message: If you are getting one long line that is not word wrapping, it is either a bug in the browser or a bug in the CSS for the page. Either way it should be able to be fixed with CSS changes.
Adding  tags actually makes it look much worse for everyone else. For example, with the 03:20 29 Sep 2004 revision, with these extra tags, it looks like this for me:
.ad .ae .af .ag .ai .al .am .an .ao .aq .ar .as .at .au .aw .az .ba .bb .bd .be .bf .bg .bh .bi .bj .bm .bn .bo .br .bs .bt .bv .bw .by .bz .ca .cc .cd .cf .cg .ch .ci .ck .cl .cm .cn .co
.cr .cs .cu .cv .cx .cy .cz .de .dj .dk .dm .do .dz .ec .ee .eg .eh .er .es .et .fi .fj .fk .fm .fo .fr .ga .gb .gd .ge .gf .gh .gi .gl .gm .gn .gp .gq .gr .gs .gt .gu .gw .gy .hk .hm .hn .hr
.ht .hu .id .ie .il .in .io .iq .ir .is .it .jm .jo .jp .ke .kg .kh .ki .km .kn .kp .kr .kw .ky .kz .la .lb .lc .ld .li .lk .lr .ls .lt .lu .lv .ly .ma .mc .md .mg .mh .mk .ml .mm .mn .mo .mp .mq
.mr .ms .mt .mu .mv .mw .mx .my .mz .na .nc .ne .nf .ng .ni .nl .no .np .nr .nu .nz .om .pa .pe .pf .pg .ph .pk .pl .pm .pn .pr .ps .pt .pw .py .qa .re .ro .ru .rw .sa .sb .sc .sd
.se .sg .sh .si .sj .sk .sl .sm .sn .so .sr .st .sv .sy .sz .tc .td .tf .tg .th .tj .tk .tl .tm .tn .to .tp .tr .tt .tv .tw .tz .ua .ug .um .us .uy .uz .va .vc .ve .vg .vi .vn .vu .wf .ws .ye .yt
.za .zm .zw
The problem with this approach is that everyone's browser is a different width, and many people use different fonts or font sizes. Therefore what looks good on your browser will look bad on someone elses. So basically, please fix the HTML so it word wraps independent of screen size, rather than adding  tags. --kjd 15:09, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding &lt;br&gt; tags

message: I've reformatted the template:
* lost a bunch of white space at the left and bottom, so it's now 7 lines deep, rather than 13
* removed the vertical bars, which make it harder to read along the line; they aren't really needed in this kind of template, because it's clear that each word is a separate link
* increased the font size, because it was hard to read at 82%
Given all this, I'd appreciate knowing why I was reverted :) sjorford (?!) 09:29, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In Opera, and IE, it's showing up as one massive line for all "Active" and then everything else on the next line. Horrible mess. Will revert again - sorry, but something's wrong here. Shimgray 01:32, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Damn, so it is. That'll teach me for using Firefox :) I suspect it could be to do with the width="100%" attributes - investigating. sjorford #£@%&$?! 08:18, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

text: Okay, should be fixed now - it was the dots at the start of each word that was causing the browsers to run them together as a single word. I've added   before each dot to fool it. Can anyone confirm that this works in Opera, I don't have it installed right now. sjorford #£@%&$?! 10:32, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good in Opera and IE. Thanks! Shimgray 12:36, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting changes 

message: Should .gb be moved to the "retired" category? This TLD is already disused and all the subdomains have moved to .uk. --Deryck C. 05:46, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: i just came on this talk page to ask the same question. my answer is "yes", so i'm doing it now. tomasz. 13:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  .gb 

message: .bv is Active and Allocated/unused. Mistake?  Leonarh 12:09, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed in "active", according  (the link is from IANA site). Cate | Talk 09:59, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Double domen

message: Shuldn't .yu be moved into the Phaseout category??? Even though it is stated as active, I don't see why it is anymore less retired than .su — ChrisDHDR  FøřůM  •  €D!†$  20:11, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it shouldn't. .su is listed by Iana as being phased out. .yu is not. ---80.144.97.3 23:34, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[.yu]] 

message: Shouldn't there be a link to .dd? I don't know which category it pertains... .dd was available to be assigned but was never indeed. In any case, there is a Wikipedia entry about it, so it should appear linked in the template.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.40.24.23 (talk) 00:08, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  .dd 

message: .su is currently listed in the Active category.  While this is true, ICAAN wants to get rid of it, do they not?  So shouldn't it be listed in phaseout? Just wondering, Mnmazur (talk)
: no, it's active with no planned phaseout in the visible future. Elk Salmon (talk) 17:49, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  .su status 

message: I disagree with this  and reverted it. (missing paren (talk) 19:11, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The information is useful, if you want to put the country name in parentheses next to each code. Tool-tips are completely useless when the link (<a>) element occupies exactly the same screen area (over-riding the title attribute) and marginal in other cases. Screen-shot of your version . The hidden message “Bahamas” does not actually appear. ―cobaltcigs 21:22, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I cannot post a screenshot because tooltips don't appear on screenshots. However, if they aren't useful to you it doesn't mean they aren't useful to people using Firefox. (missing paren (talk) 16:22, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tooltips are useful 

message: Should .p2p be added?
http://torrentfreak.com/bittorrent-based-dns-to-counter-us-domain-seizures-101130/
Terrorist96 (talk) 17:22, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  .p2p 

message: Is .eu italicized for a reason? Trivialist (talk) 20:44, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  .eu italicized 

message: remove .KRD ! 195.66.166.4 (talk) 10:10, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. L293D (☎ • ✎) 14:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 April 2018 

message: The ISO 3166-1 section currently includes .krd, the TLD for the Kurdistan region.
While .krd is indeed a top level domain, .krd is not a part of ISO 3166-1https://www.iso.org/iso-3166-country-codes.html which by definition only includes two-letter country codes.  
Even the Wikipedia article on ISO 3166-1 respects this definition.
.krd should therefore be moved to the Others section of this template. Rbksr (talk) 12:18, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move or remove .krd, not part of ISO 3166-1 

message: Not EU. --5.43.86.137 (talk); 11:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  .ευ 

message: Similar to the .p2p mentioned above, there are .onion, .i2p, .arpa and recently .alt. Should those get an own section? Cobn3a5 (talk) 20:32, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Exotic" TLDs