lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:PeaceMaker

message: this page was essentially an unaltered copy of the game website, , so i deleted it and replaced it with a stub.  It needs some work . . .  --heah 02:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: copyvio

message: What do you think about removing the next two links from the article?
*Thomas Barnett blog on PeaceMaker - Also it has PeaceMaker in the title, the article talk about something else.
*Game Developers Conference 2005 - does not hold any valuable information
Mark Matusevich (talk) 17:41, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: Is the statement that the game simulates the conflict appropriate? At best, the game simulates political views on the conflict of its creators and sponsors. Saying that it "simulates", creates an impression that the consequences of your decisions in the game will be some how close to their consequences in the real world. Or at least, they will be close to what scientific consensus says it will be. But as the conflict is a political issue, there is no any consensus.
Mark Matusevich (talk) 18:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simulator? 

message: The game should not be in "educational video games" category. Propaganda is not an education after all! What do you think?
Mark Matusevich (talk) 18:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is clear about its political position, and is educational in teaching the different challenges confronting Israeli and Palestinian leaders.  Tedperl (talk) 18:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Educational video games category
Talk:By Dawn's Early Light

message: I could SWEAR I saw this in the theater with my mom and it was in 35mm and wide.  Very clear VFX.  The mushroom cloud scene looked much more vivid, in particular.  Am I mis-remembering this? -Reticuli65.186.61.58 (talk) 07:52, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Limited Number of 35mm Prints and Brief Theatrical Release?

message: This whole section seems a little unencyclopedic - I don't see any cites for any of this stuff.  I'd suggest removing it, or linking to a 'Realism Problems with BDEL' web site, if any such thing exists. Banality 02:02, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unrealistic Elements?

message: the article states that:
"receives a teleprinter message informing him that the second nuclear strike was directed at the Chinese, not at the United States, meaning that the United States will now suffer further casualties."
- shouldn't that be "the US will _NOT_ suffer further casualties"?
Thanks
wiki-ny-2007 (talk) 19:05, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that looks like an error. Good catch! JoeSperrazza (talk) 19:11, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Before I make this edit, confirmation that there's a typo..?

message: Ñ  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.243.181.25 (talk) 23:07, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  I noticed when Washington is Nuked the lights in the White House remain on.There is no EMP? 

message: The Looking Glass EC-135, at the time of the movie, was not a TACAMO plane. In 90 TACAMO (VQ3 and VQ4) were flying EC-130's and were beginning the transition to the E-6 models. It is my understanding that the looking glass mission has since been added to the TACAMO platform in the E-6B. While TACAMO is referenced in the film (and Crimson Tide)TACAMOs primary role was communication with subs, NOT airborne aircraft. the antenna required to receive the ELF signals is extremely long and impractical for airborne platforms. 
162.135.0.57 (talk) 21:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tacamo 

message: The article makes no sense when it says that a condition level used in the movie, “Cocked pistol,” is actually  only used in training, to avoid anyone mistakenly beating it and thinking we are close to a nuclear war, but then the section goes on to say that “Cocked pistol” is the very highest actual alert level, equal to DEFCON 1. Edison (talk) 21:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cocked pistol
Talk:Beloit (town), Wisconsin

message: The name of Beloit as used by the Hoocąk Indians was Keečąk 'eeja and has been for centuries. I don't know if I'm doing something wrong or if you're just censoring me, but please stop removing it. I am citing a very credible source, which is a book on the language.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.128.90.51 (talk) 00:05, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoocąk Name 
Talk:Countdown to Looking Glass

message: The article ends by saying that "One of the CTV rebroadcasts of the film in the mid-1980s occurred only days before an actual confrontation in the Persian Gulf occurred between American and Soviet ships". What incident does this refer to? A shufty on Google suggests this occasion, but that was in 1991. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 18:57, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viking motif 

message: I think the current plot synopsis could stand a slight overhaul. One of the themes (or underlying plot lines) of the story is also the US Government's ability to respond to such fast-paced crises in the era of 24-hour news. There are details dropped about how side-swiped the White House was by the near-simultaneous occurrence of the Omanian coup and the bank crisis, the SecDef collapsing of a heart attack shortly after a brief news conference, and how Dory's boyfriend described the "signal-to-noise-ratio" of the available intelligence to the WH as "horrendous," explaining why those satellite photos may have been overlooked in the mad dash to get control of the situation.
The current plot synopsis does tend to leave those details behind... Eddievhfan1984 (talk) 21:05, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing theme 

message: Is this based on review of declassified doctrinal information or estimates of deployment numbers? It seems much more reasonable to me that a nuclear cruise missile would have been used, given the development of those weapon systems to evade NATO air defense systems. Every Tupolev bomber of the era deployed nuclear anti-ship cruise missiles (Tu-16,20,22M,95/160).50.147.26.108 (talk) 19:05, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nuclear torpedo claim 

message: Is this based on review of declassified doctrinal information or estimates of deployment numbers? It seems much more reasonable to me that a nuclear cruise missile would have been used, given the development of those weapon systems to evade NATO air defense systems. Every Tupolev bomber of the era deployed nuclear anti-ship cruise missiles (Tu-16,20,22M,95/160).50.147.26.108 (talk) 19:05, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nuclear torpedo claim
Talk:The Sum of All Fears (film)

message: My minor edit and what looks like rather substantial and useful editing of the plot were reverted in the course of a sock puppet hunt. Was there no other way to remove just the sock's edits? ZarhanFastfire (talk) 17:30, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It's probably up to individual editors to restore what they see as helpful (even possibly to restore edits made by a sock). There doesn't seem to always be a way to automatically surgically extract unhelpful editing once subsequent editing has taken place. I think the editor doing the reversions tried to retain some of what they saw as helpful. However, that can be a chore, especially if the damage done is across many articles and the cleanup tedious in consequence. Dhtwiki (talk) 15:06, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Good faith edits reverted
Talk:General classification

message: I think there is an inaccuracy in the article about crashes in the final kilometer.
Here is what the UCI regulations say about crashes in the final kilometer of a stage race:
Finish
; 2.6.026: In the case of a duly noted fall, puncture or mechanical incident beyond the red flare, the rider or riders involved shall be credited with the time of the rider or riders in whose company they were riding at the moment of the accident. His or their placing shall be determined by the order in which he or they actually cross the finishing line. 
;2.6.027: If, as the result of a fall beyond the red flare, a rider cannot cross the finishing line, he shall be placed last in the stage and credited with the time of the rider or riders in whose company he was riding at the time of the accident.
The article text implies a different meaning to me, that if you crash you are credited with the same time as the group you entered the final km with, but the regulations say that you get the same time as the riders you were with at the moment of the accident.
RosinDebow 19:10, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Obscure (video game)

message: This article mixes information about the plot and story of the game, as well as the end, fairly freely within all the sections.  Could it be edited to make a more general section without such information?  For someone that is using the article to find out about the game, finding certain key plot points in the character description (such as where the character is found, or whether they survive the game), for instance, is frustrating.    Lorechaser (talk) 19:19, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I also feel that the article goes over much more than it should, but in particular that it reveals many of the plot elements of the second game in the article for the first game. Shouldn't those comments be kept in the second article, or, if they are needed, in the section labeled 'Obscure II'. I know that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an un-spoiler, but that's rather too much detail for this article. Mizunori (talk) 04:49, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoiler/Non-Spoiler 

message: Can someone actually put the names of the songs into the article, rather than just 'In the German version there were many songs from Sportfreunde Stiller.'  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.17.163.44 (talk) 17:42, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: German Soundtrack
Talk:Pyst

message: I had heard of this game in the 90's, so it has some degree of reputation.  Perhaps the bulk of the content should be Merged with Myst? Dangerdan97 (talk) 18:24, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's already mentioned in the Parodies and fan games section of the Myst article - I really don't think there's any need for detail any greater than that already given. Regardless, this article really isn't notable, and so in my opinion can certainly be deleted. TheIslander 18:57, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There're some very notable sources for this.. so.. I dunno. :P Rehevkor (talk) 03:45, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There are now - there weren't when I made the comment above :P. I'm still not entirely convinced that this article is notable enough not to just be included in Myst, but meh - I'm happy enough for it to stay now. TalkIslander 12:00, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable enough 

message: Just off the top of my head, Ultimuh predates this by a few years, and that is without even doing research.  I realize the article does not claim this is truly the first parody game, but seriously, that is quite the ridiculous claim.  I bet it had been at least a decade since the first, if not longer. 216.81.81.80 (talk) 16:20, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow, not even close to the earliest parody game
Talk:Schizm: Mysterious Journey

message: Detalion is not mentioned as a developer in the infobox. SharkD (talk) 20:54, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Detalion 

message: Afraid there is too much in-universe content. The article should state details on gameplay and plot. The information on areas needs to be detailed as a subsection of the plot, conveyed as settings, with the right level of detail for a general encyclopedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.155.9.12 (talk) 10:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too Much In-Universe Content
Talk:Still Life (video game)

message: A big thank you to whoever wrote the plot summary, for giving away the end of the story in the third paragraph. Nice work. Pearce.duncan 03:48, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed bits of the plot summary which give away the murderers details. TubularWorld 11:43, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good job on the spoilers 

message: "However, on December 6, 2007, Microïds announced the development of a sequel, Still Life 2, which was released in 2009.[3]"
It's 2013...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.235.96.140 (talk) 08:01, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice updating here
Talk:The Colonel's Bequest

message: Can we put the identity of the killer/the ending details, or are spoilers allowed on wikipedia? Evilwillhunting (talk) 20:05, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The game's sequel, The Dagger of Amon Ra, clearly has an Art Deco aesthetic, but the minor deco flourishes in this game seem incidental. How can it be said that this game is notable for its Art Deco style? I could find no reliable sources for this descriptor. WikkanWitch (talk) 17:31, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Art Deco?
Talk:The Legend of Lotus Spring

message: This was the company's only game and most of their non-game ventures had to do with extra projects for the property, like an online PDF novella that expanded the story. Any non-TLoLS projects could go into an "Aftermath" section.--Coin945 (talk) 08:51, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 20:19, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women Wise merge
Talk:Unirally

message: I read on  that production of Uniracers was stopped due to a lawsuit by Pixar, so only the initial run of 300k were sold.  This information should be incorporated into the article. —Pie4all88 T C 20:36, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lawsuit
Talk:Here's to New Dreams

message: To whomever posted the figures of 73,000 for Undeniable and 8,000 for Here's To New Dreams:
Are you sure that Undeniable  sold 73,000 and Here's To New Dreams sold 8,000, or was it 73,000 for Here's To New Dreams and 8,000 for Undeniable?  Somebody with connections to SoundScan quoted 73,000 for Here's To New Dreams, 2,000 for the original Undeniable and 8,000 for its re-release, called From Then Until... (a combined 10,000).  Can you please check your info again to make sure you have the correct figure for its corresponding album?  --CookyMonzta 07:06, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sales mixup?
Talk:Canon law of the Catholic Church

message: The source for this statement CanonLaw.info doesn't seem reliable nor unbiased. I don't have access to the other source provided in the lede. My main concern is that "continuously functioning" is vague. Pythagimedes (talk) 17:04, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  oldest continuously functioning legal system in the West 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Medicine and Canon Law and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#Medicine and Canon Law until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Veverve (talk) 01:35, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Medicine and Canon Law" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Consent (in Canon Law) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#Consent (in Canon Law) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Veverve (talk) 01:37, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Consent (in Canon Law)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Compromise (in Canon Law) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#Compromise (in Canon Law) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Veverve (talk) 01:39, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Compromise (in Canon Law)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Template talk:House of the Dead

message: The first The Typing of the Dead is currently listed as a spin-off, but not The Typing of the Dead II nor The Typing of the Dead: Overkill. This should be consistent. If the idea is to have an article on the entire sub-series, the linked article should be about the sub-series, not the first game of it. 24.203.198.149 (talk) 01:15, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Typing of the Dead sub-series inconsistency
Talk:Scratches (video game)

message: I feel the "Explanation" section goes beyond the scope of an encyclopedia article.  I think what should be covered here are the developmental history and commercial and technical facts about the game.  The "gist" of the game itself is sufficiently described in the "Description" section; is it really necessary to include a separate section that gives the solution to the game?  Surely the Description is enough.  I am removing the Explanation section here:
:==Explanation==
:
:An evil spirit was unleashed on the Blackwood house through the African mask. This evil spirit of the mask caused the madness of James Blackwood. It also caused their newborn son, Robin, to be mutated into some kind of monster. Unable to face the horrible reality, the couple, with the help of Dr. Milton hid the boy in the cellar and claimed he died at birth. The three also removed all records of Robins existence and bricked up his room. Catherine, who wanted to see her son, was attacked and killed by Robin.  James buried his wife in the yard fearing that someone would find out about his monsterous son. James Blackwood is most certainly dead by the time the game takes place, though the whereabouts of his body are not known. Dr. Milton however is still alive, and continues to feed Robin through the grate that leads to the cellar. The end of the game you are chased from the cellar by Robin Blackwood who is about 15 years old at the time. Play the game more than once and the story will become more clear. 
If someone insists upon returning this to the article, at least copyedit it.  It's pretty crudely constructed.  12.22.250.4 21:08, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Explanation"?? 
Talk:Voyeur (video game)

message: Hi
The article says PG 13 rating for Voyeur but these are the images we can find on the internet :
http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTRGXzNc98PCjomBEcKQf20HtZ04FVeoK-Ui4jCY1wlktts0_MLa40HkBH1
http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRwfo3JAl2tdNlx7zPIdUW_w_gXYBqur0edFx87zVclFV4gDq-j0o_YFukZoA
It's clearly rated M for Mature
sseb22 (talk) 13:48, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  PG-13 rating ??
Talk:WGY (AM)

message: :Image:810 WGY logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:10, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:810 WGY logo.gif

message: Removed current schedule information in accordance with WikiProject Radio Station body section and Wikipedia NOT section.  Broadcast schedules are not encylopedic content according to Wikipedia's rules.
Added extensive history based on information found around the internet, FCC data bases, and files and collections I have rescued from various trash receptacles over the years.
Div60 (talk) 21:45, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Added extensive history

message: With WGY's programming now on FM, shouldn't WGY-FM be redirected to this article? --JB82 (talk) 00:09, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new redirect?
Talk:Political communications

message: This article is inappropriate, to be short (as this also). There are some 5-6 external links. Maybe reading them would help to define wich are it's main fields, or at least, what is it's definition :) --VinceB 21:33, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

message: I added an 'expert attention' tag. Cleanup is required, but I don't have the time of knowledge to provide it. Martpol 13:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems likeit would be easy enough to clean up, but the explanations provided make little sense based on American ways of operating things. It was clearly written from a more european point of view.  It needs to be made more generalized with a more worldwide worldview. --Lendorien 20:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup needed

message: I will be spending the months of June-December 2008 studying the field of political communications at both the University level and in a Non-Profit Organization. Perhaps, during and at the end of this time I will be able to contribute a high level of substance to this article. Hopefully, by then someone will have already added to it, if not, I will be here expanding and revising.
I will touch on the following: 
Study of and fields of Political Communications 
New Media (a.k.a use of YouTube, blogs, podcasts, and websites in recent campaigns)
Political Communications in the United States
Political Communications in the United Kingdom
-- () 16:32, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do follow up on this!  Your work on it would be much appreciated! --Lendorien (talk) 20:32, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Revising

message: I think the section on the role of social media needs attention. 
The wording here suggests an opinion and could be adjusted ( ex: "need to establish themselves..." and "social media will be more important than traditional media..."). New15txstate (talk) 16:18, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Evaluation
Talk:Dracula Unleashed

message: I've never heard of a version of this game made for Microsoft Windows. I own a copy made for MS-DOS, so that definitely exists. Can anyone confirm a Windows version or is that just a mistake?
--80.171.91.216 22:48, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Gah, probably just someone (e.g. myself) not paying much attention.  The only PC version of the game which I am aware of is in fact an MS-DOS title, as you note, and is not specifically designed for Windows. --Slordak 14:38, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well the above comment is over two years old and the page still says Windows 95.  Amusingly, it says it was released for Windows 95... in 1993.  I'm just going to go ahead and change that.  春・Harukaze・風 18:40, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windows?
Talk:Vancouver Technical Secondary School

message: refs --- see the ref tag, pics - good, alumni - remember to ref! welcome Victuallers 08:00, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess for Schools

message: My Latin's rusty - does this mean "we are always above/on top?"Skookum1 (talk) 14:54, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Motto - ''Semper sursum''
Talk:The Dark Crystal (video game)

message: *Jeux & Stratégie HS #3https://archive.org/details/jeux-et-strategie-hs-3/page/56/mode/2up
8.37.179.254 (talk) 21:56, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews