Talk:Sirikitiya Jensen

message: This article should be called Sirikitiya Jensen, not Sirikitiya.  She isn't Thai royalty. Patiwat 21:35, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that's what I was trying to remember. Also, the royal family series box shouldn't be included in Princess Ubol Rattana' children's articles, surely? Paul C 19:28, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a bit trickier.  Her children aren't royalty.  But they are still related to the royal family.  I think they should be in the box in order to show that they are related by blood.  Patiwat 01:08, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article should be moved to Sirikitiya Jensen 

message: It was requested that this article be renamed but the procedure outlined at WP:RM#How to request a page move did not appear to be followed, and consensus could not be determined. Please request a move again with proper procedure if there is still a desire for the page to be moved. Thank you for your time! -- tariqabjotu 01:13, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move Request

message: Even though IMGP0614.JPG is a GFDL licensed photo, I feel that it is not the most appropriate photo per this article. It is more likely to be taken from a private collection which doesn't fit the highest (quality) standard required by many encyclopedia. any thought? underexpose 07:30, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think her portrait photo from Thai version of this article is more appropriate. underexpose 07:33, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Private Photo? 

message: I believe Khun Sirikitiya is notable to be included in wiki entries. Even though she doesn't retain a formal title, she is still widely considered as a member of Thai royal family. underexpose 06:07, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move to Sirikitiya Jensen.  It is obvious everyone wants to include a surname.  Mai vs. Sirikitiya can be discussed more if wanted, but I would just not get into that: it's not that important what the article is titled as long as it's correct, not POV, and there is a redirect from one to the other. —Mets501 (talk) 01:46, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Delete as non-notable.  Failing that, support move.  This is just an ordinary American, with an ordinary American name.  Gene Nygaard 15:37, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Failing that, oppose move and support move to Mai Jensen instead.  This is an ordinary American whose ordinary American name, according to the article, is Mai Jensen.  Gene Nygaard 17:34, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

text: *Her name is "Mai", so it shouldn't be "Sirikitiya" with or without a surname, royal or not. Gene Nygaard 19:58, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not the applicable standard.  See below.  Gene Nygaard 02:30, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Propose changing lede to explain her honorific and her names as follows:Sirikitiya Jensen () is a semi-member of the Thai Royal Family.  Born on 18 March 1985 to former princess Ubol Ratana Rajakanya, eldest daughter of King Bhumibol Adulyadej and Queen Sirikit, and American Peter Ladd Jensen; she is acknowledged as Their Majesties'  granddaughter. She is known by the Thai royal and noble courtesy title Khun ()  prefixed to her given name, Sirikitiya, (similar to that of her grandmother, as her brother's name Bhumi is similar to his grandfather's,) or more commonly prefixed to her Thai nickname Mai (,) which means "new," and also translates to "shining, young, beautiful." 
--Pawyilee (talk) 11:02, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't think all of that is necessary. I've tweaked the article a bit though. --Paul_012 (talk) 17:53, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the teaks, especially for Note 1. I do talk too much, even though I know less is more. --Pawyilee (talk) 07:03, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede