Talk:Cognitive effects of bilingualism

message: article needs to be edited and expanded...adding it to  my talk page. (Patrick 10:03, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What kind of wording would be acceptable as to politically correct describe "advantages"? Is it just in the cognitive area that this is inappropriate, or should we think about speaking more neutrally about, say, the amount of wealth and the "advantages" it may provide? Perhaps saying just "differences of opportunities", not implying that having more access to a variety of "resources" is necessarily "advantageous"? Or, still more related with this subject, perhaps one should pay attention to the articles dealing with the levels of education and vocabulary still in a single language; I fear there may be passages expressing the POV that more education and larger vocabulary may be "advantageous", even cognitively (in fact, the IQ-related studies probably cite the positive correlation of IQ and vocabulary, and are likely to say that higher IQ is "advantageous" to some degree). The same applies for skill acquisitions in general, like math, musical, artistic, or professional training. Who's to say that an skill is an "advantage"? And maybe we should question whether an individual not having acquired any language at all implies in a cognitive "deficit", as it's just the implicit affirmation of an advantage for language acquisition. And if a single language is deemed advantageous over none, that could be used to try to support the POV that more languages may be additionally advantageous.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.74.188.62 (talk) 14:55, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think this would be a better title, because it's more general; bilingualism is a subset of multilingualism and also redirects to multilingualism.  any thoughts? Catrìona (talk) 01:19, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey there Catrìona I agree. I think if it were a little more general as you mentioned or even: "The Cognitive Effects of Bilingualism," it would stand on a little more on neutral grounds. Overall, I think the work in the article has potential and should be appreciated. I would like to potentially contribute where I can and give it some more attention. Take care all Varnellr16 (talk) 00:24, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to [[Cognitive advantages of multilingualism]] 

message: Hello everyone, I wanted to let whoever views this page know I am wanting to try and contribute some edits that I have made in my sandbox of this page. I reworked some sections and changed up some lines which I thought could stand to be a little more neutrally conveyed. Under the section titled "Is bilingualism or executive control the causative force?" I am still unsure as to whether or not the name should be changed. I won't try and change it, I just thought that it should be brought into attention to see what other peoples perspective is on it. In my honest opinion I think it is POV and expresses a possible bias that could make the entirety of the article appear a little more personal than it should be. I thoroughly enjoy the collection of information and all of the people who have contributed to the article. It's such an interesting topic and I would love to see more attention drawn to get it up to a higher grade level. Anyway feel free to let me know what you think of my edits. I would love to be a part of such an incredible topic. Kind regards. Varnellr16 (talk) 07:05, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your work on this article! I changed the heading of that section. This isn't a high traffic article (<10 views per day), so you shouldn't be shy about making changes to the article directly, although you can keep using your sandbox if you prefer. Catrìona (talk) 22:26, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hello Catrìona, Just worked on the article a fair amount. Added an image from wikicommons. I made some edits and removed one piece that didn't have any citation and was a stand alone segment. From my perspective it appeared as a statement, I didn't think it fit properly with Wikipedia's guidelines. Thank you for the response, hopefully the article was improved. I would like to see others far more capable than myself give it some attention though. Keep the discussion going.:) Varnellr16 (talk) 08:05, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding changes to "Cognitive advantages of multilingualism" [[User:Varnellr16|Varnellr16]] ([[User talk:Varnellr16|talk]]) 07:05, 8 November 2018 (UTC) 

message: All the picture in the lead says is "Wakuni City, Japan" with no hint as to why it's there. Can someone think up a more useful caption for it and explain how it's related to the possible benefits of multilingualism?--Megaman en m (talk) 09:55, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pointless picture in the lead 

message: :Cognitive advantages of multilingualism →  – Advantages in the article title does not follow WP:POVNAMING Clovermoss (talk) 21:52, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the page, since it seems a pretty straightforward case. If someone disagrees, please feel free to reopen the discussion (or ask me to - I'm happy to do it). Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:10, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 October 2019 

message: Hi everyone! I am editing this page for an Educational Neuroscience class and wanted to let those who follow the page know my plan. This article was missing a citation for the definition of "executive function," so I will be adding that. The "Empirical findings" section of the page relies on many single studies, focusing on details of what those studies did specifically. I have found a literature review covering this information, and will be using that (along with some of the information already in this section) to make more broad statements and rely less on single sources. The "Analyses" section has some redundant information that could be better moved to other areas in this article. I was also confused by the section title "Analyses," as this is something typically seen in a scientific article. I plan on removing that section header, moving relevant information from that section to more appropriate places in the article, and then am going to add a new section called "Bimodal bilinguals." The "Analyses" section touches on bimodal bilingualism, but I will make it it's own section and add additional information, along with another source. Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cspel (talk • contribs) 18:04, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  My planned edits for class April 2022 

message: It would be helpful to connect the title with the beginning paragraphs. It was unclear that bilingualism is a subset of multilingualism, so I initially thought the title was wrong. "Multilingualism" isn't mentioned until 5 paragraphs into the content. Ck320492 (talk) 02:28, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear that bilingualism is a subset of multilingualism 

message: — Assignment last updated by Joseph.palagano (talk) 16:28, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Educational Neuroscience Proseminar

message: As mentioned in August 2018 talk between Catriona and Varnellr16, while "multilingualism" is a more general term, the article content throughout the years doesn't include commentary on more than 2 languages (ex. trilinguals). I will add a sentence in the first paragraph noting that bilingualism is a subset of multilingualism. Ck320492 (talk) 22:37, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Changing title to "cognitive effects of bilingualism"