Talk:Khalid Yasin

message: What is this section doing ? it has no significance whatsoever to the article. Also, riddling half the biography with controversies is extremely biased. either make the article long and substantial so its not just controversies or remove that section altogether. It seems like a character assassination article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.8.231.89 (talk) 13:09, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sunday Nights With John Cleary 

message: I have removed all the statements regarding fraud because the cited references do not work and of the links that did work, gave no mention or any of the slightest indication of fraud or criminal wrongdoing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.167.205.86 (talk) 22:00, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Other sources regarding this issue here and here.--Aa2-2004 (talk) 15:10, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: One more here.--Aa2-2004 (talk) 15:17, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Fraud Allegations

message: Why is the Sep. 11 ref. important ? MP (talk•contribs) 20:30, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: September 11 ?

message: What makes revert better than convert? I don't know if using 'revert' is trying to make a point or not but I don't see why it should be 'convert'?翔太 「Shouta:talk」 16:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am going to change it to convert now. Be Bold, eh? 翔太 「Shouta:talk」 17:08, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely Convert and not revert. Convert is the most neutral term.--Aa2-2004 (talk) 15:19, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not defending the use of the word, but in the NME interview, he uses these terms. He describes going from Christianity to Islam as reverting back to God. But I agree that the article should use the common "convert." Luke 19 Verse 27 (talk) 11:47, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert vs. Convert 

message: In this edit, a user asks how a section was plagurized. The section was copied word-for-word from a copy written, unreliable source. Hipocrite (talk) 01:20, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagurized/Copyvio 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Khalid Yasin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130503025358/http://sgp1.paddington.ninemsn.com.au/sunday/cover_stories/article_1883.asp?s=1 to http://sgp1.paddington.ninemsn.com.au/sunday/cover_stories/article_1883.asp?s=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:48, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:06, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: Did Alliah make the hevens and Earth No 27.123.139.94 (talk) 17:52, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Truth