Talk:British Rail Class 375

message: Why does the infobox picture not include the whole driving cab? 194.80.106.135 (talk) 15:52, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Because somebody changed it. I have swapped it for the previous image which shows the cab. NRTurner (talk) 09:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox Photo

message: This article is currently named in accordance the Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways naming conventions for British rolling stock allocated a TOPS number. A proposal to change this convention and/or its scope is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Naming convention, where your comments would be welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avicennasis (talk • contribs) 18:22, 10 March 2011
:This paragraph was added 2011 - I guess that discussion is now over ! -- Beardo (talk) 12:51, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  it was really a no consensus result. While the current title isn't exactly accurate, it is sort of the least worst option. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible change to the title of this article

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on British Rail Class 375. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111010023053/http://www.bombardier.com:80/en/transportation/products-services/rail-vehicles/intercity-trains/multiple-units/electrostar---united-kingdom?docID=0901260d8001283f to http://www.bombardier.com/en/transportation/products-services/rail-vehicles/intercity-trains/multiple-units/electrostar---united-kingdom?docID=0901260d8001283f#
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120403040430/http://www.kentrail.org.uk/Class%20375%20&%20377.htm to http://www.kentrail.org.uk/Class%20375%20&%20377.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:46, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems OK Dr Sludge (talk) 07:49, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Not major, but the diagram for the Class 375/9 is wrong. The First Class section is found at either end of the unit, not in coach 2 or 3. Could someone possibly change this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doomotron (talk • contribs) 19:34, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for letting me know, i'll correct that Don't be afraid to be creative  (talk) 12:48, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagrams 

message: The Formation section in the infobox currently (Apr 2021) states:
    375/3 - 3 cars per unit (DMOC-PTOSL-DMOS)
    375/6 - 4 cars per unit (DMOC-PTOSL-MOSL-DMOC) (refurbished - (DMOS-PTOSL-MOCL-DMOS))
    Others - 4 cars per unit (DMOC-TOSL-MOSL-DMOC) (refurbished - (DMOS-PTOSL-MOCL-DMOS))
    375/9 (refurbished) - 4 cars per unit (DMOC-PTOSL-MOSL-DMOC)
This implies that Class 375/3 is a dual-voltage pantograph fitted unit (ie PTOSL rather than TOSL), which I believe is incorrect.
Equally it implies refurbished units of sub-classes 375/7 and 375/8, listed as 'Others', and 375/9 are being converted to dual-voltage pantograph fitted (PTOSL vs TOSL) during refurbishment which I don't think is the case as it is mentioned in neither the Refurbishment section, nor the referenced Southeastern press release.
The listed refurbished formation for Class 375/9 also seems to fail to reference the combination of first class into the MOSL, making it a MOCL and the DMOC units DMOS. There are no references in either the Refurbishment section, or the referenced Southeastern press release to this not being done on the 375/9s as it is on all the other sub-classes.
I have no references to hand confirming all of this, but as it stands the information is definitely inconsistent between Formations, Refurbishment, and the Southeastern press relief quoted as reference.
86.8.177.103 (talk) 16:54, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Technically, the PTOSL on the 375/3 should just be TSOL since despite having the pantograph well in place, it doesn't actually have a pantograph. WestRail642fan (talk) 20:33, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Formations

message: Apparel 375601 hit a Tree and was driven by Richard Evans from the YouTube channel Dad Rail.--I Like The british Rail Class 483 (talk) 20:27, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You might have to give more of explanation here: Apparel? Why is tree in caps for the first letter? What's the significance? ..... The joy of all things (talk) 21:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparel 375601 hit a Tree