lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cartersville, Georgia

message: The following is unsourced information:
*Miami Dolphins running back Ronnie Brown graduated from Cartersville High School.
*Cartersville is home to the Miss Georgia USA and Miss Georgia Teen USA.  (dead link)
* Cartersville is home to the world's first outdoor painted advertisement of the Coca-Cola brand. In 1894 a syrup salesman painted "Drink Coca Cola" on the side of what is now Young Brothers Pharmacy in old downtown. It was found under multiple layers of paint during restoration on the building. In 1994 the Coca-Cola company authenticated the wall advertisement as the world's first. (is this a reliable source?)This is the official website of the Cartersville - Bartow County Visitors Bureau.  I believe it is accurate.
*Starting story of The Mosquito Coast was filming in Cartersville, Georgia as fictional city in Massachusetts as you see stores on street and Rome, Georgia.
While this is interesting, we can't use it unless you provide a source. Also, none of this is really trivia, as trivia by its definition is "unimportant information" - it therefore shouldn't be in a trivia section but instead the information should be incorporated into the main article. - Tbsdy lives (talk) 00:16, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material 

message: The file :File:Anheuser-Busch canned drinking water.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Anheuser-Busch canned drinking water.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 21:07, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Anheuser-Busch canned drinking water.jpg]] 
Talk:Goodeniaceae

message: " Flowers have a single plane of symmetry (monosymmetric)."  --- zygomorphic?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.15.222.138 (talk) 07:38, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Misodendrum

message: Is Mysodendron an alternate spelling? I encountered it in an old Popular Science Monthly article: s:Popular Science Monthly/Volume 43/June 1893/Adaptations of Seeds and Fruits. If yes, can a redirect be kindly made? --Siddhant (talk) 10:32, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It probably is, but The Plant List only has Misodendrum, not -on as in the title of the article, so a bit more research seems needed. Peter coxhead (talk) 14:52, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

text: It seems that the correct name for the genus is Misodendrum, and I have moved the page. Accepted orthographic variants of the name are Misodendron and Myzodendron.  Although not listed in any taxonomic database I've yet found, Mysodendron does seem to be another incorrect spelling, so I'll create redirects for all three names. Peter coxhead (talk) 19:23, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate spelling 
Talk:Frankeniaceae

message: I have moved the list of Frankenia species to Frankenia. Maias (talk) 13:13, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Frankenia species list

message: As the family is now agreed to have only one genus, Frankenia, I have converted this page to a redirect to the genus page. All the relevant and correct information that was here is now there. Peter coxhead (talk) 13:17, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirected
Talk:Ore dressing

message: I have tidied this article up somewhat, but it still needs a lot of work.  I have begun to provide some of the detail that is needed, but it still needs a lot more.  I would counsel against providing excessive detail here, rather using this as a general article that will lead to others, dealing with specific aspects of the subject.  For example an article is needed on buddles.  I have created a title, but only as a redirect to this one.
:I think the article is now in reasonable shape and I intend to remove the Cleanup tag.  Are there any objections? Biscuittin (talk) 14:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have identified the person who appears to have review it and left a message on his talk page asking him to review it again.  Peterkingiron (talk) 23:40, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: Are ore dressing and Mineral processing not basically the same? --Hardscarf (talk) 23:22, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not sure that they are quite the same.  The problem is that processing minerals that are not metallic ores had crept inot this article.  I think it would be truer to say that ore dressing was one variety of mineral processing.  Peterkingiron (talk) 00:12, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

text: This merge nomination has been open for 18 months.  It is outside my speciality.  As far as I am concerned, please merge.  If there is really little of value here, that will merely involve converting this to a redirect.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:44, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: DoneBSMet94 (talk) 15:20, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Asteliaceae

message: Hi, for my university project, I am thinking of expanding and adding more information on this page! Maydenel (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 00:04, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Me and my partner Maydenel have updated this article as a part of a school project. Hsangha9 (talk) 23:41, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated as part of school project
Talk:Ancistrocladaceae

message: Per standard policy, if there is only one genus in Ancistrocladaceae we should generally just have one article for both the genus and the family.  The article asserts the family is monotypic and I didn't run into any fossil genera either. But I probably didn't look everywhere. Kingdon (talk) 17:20, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: merger completed. WTF? (talk) 23:46, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge Ancistrocladaceae 
Talk:Malesherbia

message: A much needed page for spaniard botanists Hipolito Ruiz and Pavon
is  needed as one in Spanish portal could be found
--Penarc 12:32, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ruiz et Pavon

message: Ruiz et Pavon botanical authority
--Penarc 12:35, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Link R et P (Spanish) 

message: a much needed page
--Penarc 12:21, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ruiz et Pavon
Talk:Goupia

message: The current version of this article says that Goupia contains three species. It gives the name of one: G. glabra. However, the Goupia article in the Portuguese Wikipedia lists five species: G. cinerascens, G. glabra, G. guatemalensis, G. paraensis, and G. tomentosa. It looks like one of these articles needs fixing. I wouldn't know which. By the way, this page says that a synonym for G. glabra is G. paraensis Huber. Tugbug 23:08, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Three species is correct; G. paraensis and G. tomentosa are both synonyms of G. glabra (from first ref cited) - MPF (talk) 11:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error (?) in Number of Species 
Talk:Chloranthaceae

message: "Several dozen species". Can someone be more accurate than this Ruskin (talk) 05:57, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the APweb figure. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:01, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of species

message: A November 2021 study in Nature Communications sequenced the Chloranthus genome and found Chloranthales sister to magnoliids. I made a brief addition to the Taxonomy section.  If there are no objections, I will change the tree in article - or anyone else is welcome to do that first.
Pmokeefe (talk) 16:51, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chloranthales sister to magnoliids, change Taxonomy tree in article?
Talk:John Brantley

message: It seems like John Brantley III (not the IV) should be at the John Brantley page, at least for now.  At the least, he should have his own seperate page and this one should be disambig.  JB III has more notoriety at this point in time, in my opinion. WTStoffs 03:07, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  John III? 

message: I removed that sentence from this article, as it wasn't cited. --CanesOL79 (talk) 01:14, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remark About Homosexuality/College Choice
Talk:Vladimir Lossky

message: I took out indents from "The genius of Eastern mythical..." and "In his Mythical Theology..." because it was formatting the article in such a way that the text of the article was colliding with the web format (and then running off screen), making most of the content unreadable.  Removing the initial spaces allows readers to read all of the article content.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.29.243.6 (talk) 17:18, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theology 
Talk:Battle of the Clouds

message: Actually, it's between what is now Exton and Malvern.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.203.125.108 (talk) 01:00, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: Copied from my talk page in case anyone can assist this user. Tim! (talk) 11:31, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of the clouds
Talk:Hernandiaceae

message: Due to a poor-quality translation from a non-English language, certain passages in the section "Flowers and fruit" are incomprehensible. It's imperative that an expert, possibly with access to reliable sources on this family, do the rewrite, as it is a rather technical section. Failing that, it may be best for the section to be abridged.--Quisqualis (talk) 22:49, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: PS: Due to a Phabricator issue, I could not tag the section for expert attention.--Quisqualis (talk) 22:53, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I tagged it. DMacks (talk) 15:53, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Flowers and fruit" section
Talk:Illicium

message: Illicium dunnianum has been added based on the following
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%BA%A2%E8%8A%B1%E5%85%AB%E8%A7%92
http://www.plant.ac.cn/latin/Illiciaceae/Illicium-dunnianum-Tutch.htm
--222.67.205.85 (talk) 09:51, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A topic of .... 

message: Illicium oligandrum has been added based on the following
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/np8004979
--222.67.205.85 (talk) 10:01, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A topic of ....

message: Illicium fargesii has been added based on the following
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/121575971/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
--222.67.205.85 (talk) 10:04, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A topic of .....

message: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WNH-4P06CFJ-4&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=4398b39863630d5f81780c9be133468b
--222.67.205.85 (talk) 10:17, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the classification of the following... 
Talk:Lepidoziaceae

message: referring to non-included figures, strange formatting, a missing period at the end of a section. I'll be getting around to boldly removing the afflicted sections in 48 hours or so unless someone wants to paraphrase the source rather than plaguarize them. It does include useful information but I am not educated enough to paraphrase it. If anyone wishes to reuse the source, be my guest but I should hope any further discussion on the sections can happen here.
Here is a link to the particular edit entry.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lepidoziaceae&diff=1118806454&oldid=1071506951&variant=en Gracchus123 (talk) 06:37, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differentiation and Ecology and Habitat sections seem plagiarized
Talk:Diapensiaceae

message: I plan to update the article to reflect recent changes in taxonomy within this family. 
ShellyG1 (talk) 13:49, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Updating 

message: What is the significance of the text “classified as a crown group” here? If I understand the definition of “crown group” correctly, then any existing clade is a crown group. Even if that definition should mean that it only applies to clades for which at least one stem group has been identified, that would probably include many families, which leaves little significance to this statement; it would be much more helpful then to simply mention a stem group. ◅ Sebastian 08:02, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: if you look at the source given (APweb), the stem group is the fossil Actinocalyx. But I agree it's not useful where it is. Peter coxhead (talk) 19:10, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for your answer and for removing the text. By “APweb”, I suppose you mean http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/. I don't, however, see “Actinocalyx” on that page. ◅ Sebastian 14:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  “classified as a crown group”
Talk:Myristicaceae

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sminthopsis84 (talk) 20:14, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Kyle J. Norton's work which was copied here, appears on many web pages. I was unable to post a link to one of the copies because it is on wikipedia's blacklist. Several copies that I checked were very explicit that duplicating the material must include the author's name and all links (and to do that would not be appropriate in wikipedia). Sminthopsis84 (talk) 20:17, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Altingiaceae

message: This is the title of the revision in PhytoKeys 31 in 2013: A taxonomic synopsis of Altingiaceae with nine new combinations, Stefanie M. Ickert-Bond, Jun Wen.
(Altingiaceae is named after Willem Alting, governor of the Dutch VOC.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.249.64.7 (talk) 15:20, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Menispermaceae

message: The comment in section "Taxa included" notwithstanding, the accepted paradigm is division into 5 tribes, and we are not on wikipedia, allowed to impose our own judgement that the existing criteria are "not good enough".  Instating, or reinstating, the 5 tribes.Sbalfour (talk) 02:10, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Menispermaceae is divided into 5 tribes 
Talk:Sabatia arkansana

message: A PICTURE of this rarity is greatly needed.Rlevse 16:56, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Why isn't the "retired mechanic turned photographer" given a name?
:He is. Read again: "It was discovered in 2001 in several glades of the Ouachita Mountains in Saline County, Arkansas by John Pelton, a retired mechanic turned amateur photographer and naturalist". Djlayton4 | talk  |  contribs 20:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Burseraceae

message: Maybe etheric oils? volatile oils????  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.21.159.28 (talk) 14:44, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  ethereal oils ??? 
Talk:Rhoiptelea

message: Some questions to consider:
Are the nuts of this tree edible?  By humans or other animals?  What is their food value?  Is commercial production possible or likely?
How do the trees reproduce?  Are they monoecious?  How pollinated?  How are seeds dispersed?  Does the species hybridise with others of the same genus? yoyo (talk) 00:45, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nuts as food; propagation
Talk:Antônio Carlos Gomes

message: The Lead has "...the first composer of non-European lineage to be accepted into the Classic tradition of music".  Does the source reveal what his lineage was (beyond the names of his parents and his own place of birth)? Davidships (talk) 21:10, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-European lineage
Talk:Pedaliaceae

message: The lead of this article references only one source which mentions the results of multiple studies. In order to make this article more reliable, more sources need to be added and maybe even some links to the original studies the main source this article pulls from is referencing. Adding more sources will also help to expand this into a full article instead of a stub. The pictures this article uses also need to be sourced. (Rrominger.f17 (talk) 19:57, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Sources need to be added
Talk:Didiereaceae

message: Hello all... 
An image used in the article, specifically :Image:Alluaudia procera.JPG, has a little bit of a licensing issue.  The image was uploaded back when the rules around image uploading were less restrictive.  It is presumed that the uploader was willing to license the picture under the GFDL license but was not clear in that regard.  As such, the image, while not at risk of deletion, is likely not clearly licensed to allow for free use in any future use of this article.  If anyone has an image that can replace this, or can go take one and upload it, it would be best.
You have your mission, take your camera and start clicking.--Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:23, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image needs replacement 

message: "The family is sometimes included within the Portulacaceae, but is treated as distinct by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group."
(There is a degree of confusion on this in Wikipedia articles: The above statement must be questioned. It is not clear whether Portulacaria is in this family as stated on the Portulacaceae page or whether this family is split off from Portulacaceae as a separate family as just stated. The key to genera below does not include Portulacaria so minimally this article needs editing by a specialist)
I shifted the above text from article space as it is more appropriate here than there. 122.109.129.154 (talk) 09:56, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing neded
Talk:Basellaceae

message: Is there a reason for this??? 82.30.84.177 (talk) 22:38, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Boussingaultia is currently considered a taxonomic synonym of Anredera. The redirect is intentional (but I've removed the link from this article). Plantdrew (talk) 22:46, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link for Boussingaulthia redirects to Anredera
Talk:Berberidaceae

message: I have started a discussion of what would be best to do about the genus on the Mahonia talk page. Please weigh in with what you know and what you think the best course of action would be. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 20:40, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion of classification of ''Mahonia''
Talk:Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007

message: long arguments in the senate.--Teedium 02:48, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to the Legislative History, "Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007" is the old name of the house passed version of the bill and in conference it was renamed "Improving America's Security Act of 2007" so that should be the name of this article and in summary. Jon 17:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title of Article and in Summary
Talk:Robert Tichborne

message: I have deleted this article and recreated it as a stub.
 
This is because Wikipedia Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License allows commercial distribution, but the current licence used by the British Civil War website is Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which places a restriction "Non-Commercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes." which the Wikipedia license does not.
Providing the requirements of the Terms of Use and WP:plagiarism are met there is no reason why information from the British Civil War website can not be summarised and and cited like any other copyright text. But it can not be copied under its copyleft licence into Wikipedia articles because its licence is more restrictive than the Wikipedia licence. -- PBS (talk) 20:13, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyleft problem

message: The article about a John Tillinghast says he was a nephew of this Robert Tichborne. Robert had a sister Elizabeth Tichborne, who is no longer believed to be a direct ancestor of mine. I am descended from John's brother Pardon. I am looking for reliable information about connections between the Tichborne and Tillinghast families. Scott Tillinghast, Houston TX (talk) 04:40, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to Tillinghast family?
Talk:Ochnaceae

message: My summary of the 2 classifications that were published in 2014 was reverted for no apparent reason. Perhaps i appeared to be an interloper, ignoring the construction template, but i am, in fact, the same person who has been making edits to this article since 24 April. I am just at a different IP address. Otherwise, i cannot imagine why anyone would object to what i wrote. My biggest objection to the revert, by far, is that i believe that an explanation for it is owed, not just to me, but more importantly, to everyone else who reads Wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.171.106.253 (talk) 22:49, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mysterious revert
Talk:Commelinaceae

message: How come Aclisia isn't listed here? Is it not given generic rank under APG II? Hesperian 05:44, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a synonym of Pollia :-) DJLayton4 (talk)
Pollia links to the Gastropod of the same name. Disambiguity page neccessary ? Wosch61 (talk) 12:35, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

text: Done. Ratzd'mishukribo (talk) 18:26, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

message: I have a couple comments and suggestions about this article that could be beneficial. Many of the facts stated in this article do not have references clearly noted after the statement. The second paragraph is an example of this; there are no references included in this paragraph to explain where any of the mentioned facts about the Commelinaceae group come from. I feel that adding the references to this paragraph and some of other facts throughout the article could improve the quality of the article. I also noticed that a few of the references used do not have a link to the actual article or source being used; adding these links in could help a reader verify the facts being stated in this article. That being said, overall, this article is useful, with a collection of information on the subject. Thanks! --Sarvere010 (talk) 18:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation and Suggestions 
Talk:Zamiaceae

message: why is this sentence here?  "... Encephalartoideae, is characterized by spirally arranged sporophylls (rather than spirally orthostichous), non-articulate leaflets and persistent leaf bases. It is represented in Australia ...."  It makes it sound like the Encephalartoideae are only in Australie, but the subfamily includes Encephalartosn and Dioon which are not from Australia. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 16:24, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Australia for Encephalartoideae?