Talk:List of Asian American jurists

message: I am not icluded in the Wikipedia.org/list of Asian American Jurists.
    Here is my info which I would like to submit for inclusion in the list:
           Frank S. Kim
           Chinese American, dob: Jan, 15, 1931
           Retired Calif. Superior Court Judge
           Mar.9, 1971, appointed to the Stockton Municipal Court by Calif. Gov. Ronald Reagan
           Mar.9, 1979, appointed to the Superior Court of San Joaquin County by Calif. Gov. Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
           July 31, 1991 retired honorably.
           Residence, 5726 Shelldrake Ct., Stockton, Ca. 95207
           Fpjorgekim@comcast.net  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.181.92.150 (talk) 00:26, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. — Myasuda (talk) 01:36, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Entry request

message: Every entry in the list should ideally have a source listed with the list.  This list currently is heavily defficinet in this matter.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:32, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More sources needed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on List of Asian American jurists. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928021816/http://www.hcba.org/District-Court/Burke-Susan.htm to http://www.hcba.org/District-Court/Burke-Susan.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060506185404/http://www.aclunc.org/aclunews/news12001/chen.html to http://www.aclunc.org/aclunews/news12001/chen.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080119122949/http://www.ny.gov/governor/press/0115085.html to http://www.ny.gov/governor/press/0115085.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061012021325/http://www.dallasbar.org/judiciary/profiles.asp?item=59 to http://www.dallasbar.org/judiciary/profiles.asp?item=59
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140416070025/http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/LuiE.pdf to http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/LuiE.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070216084006/http://calbar.ca.gov/calbar/html_unclassified/yew.html to http://calbar.ca.gov/calbar/html_unclassified/yew.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060909033629/http://aaba-bay.com/aaba/showpage.asp?code=apajudges to http://www.aaba-bay.com/aaba/showpage.asp?code=apajudges
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060225204502/http://www.aaba-bay.com/aaba/showpage.asp?code=apafederaljudges to http://www.aaba-bay.com/aaba/showpage.asp?code=apafederaljudges
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060824205313/http://www.asianweek.com/2002_08_23/bay_judges.html to http://www.asianweek.com/2002_08_23/bay_judges.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926232739/http://news.asianweek.com/news/view_article.html?article_id=696cd8e360c2584cb63300c1fbb61c50 to http://news.asianweek.com/news/view_article.html?article_id=696cd8e360c2584cb63300c1fbb61c50
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:39, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hi Fellow Editors, I'm starting a discussion inspired by good-faith edits made by User:Snickers2686 and myself. This is the first Talk Page discussion I'm starting, so I'm hoping I'm doing this correctly.
Here's my question: Should judges who achieve Senior Status be distinctly categorized as Senior, as they are on United States District Court pages (e.g. United States District Court for the District of Hawaii)? Or should they be marked strictly as either Active or Retired?  
Osevilla (talk) 17:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Senior status is a form of semi-retirement, See: senior status, but in regards to federal judges, they still have an active case load, participate in oral arguments, etc. so by no means are they "retired". Even as senior status judges, they're still considered "active" unless they die, resign or retire. It can't get much more clear cut than that. Besides, it'd be asinine to have to go back through and mark every active judge now as senior Snickers2686 (talk) 18:10, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Would it be helpful for readers to know which federal judges have achieved Senior Status? Federal judges may indeed participate with an active case load, but they do so on a volunteer basis and overall handle only about 15 percent of the federal courts' workload. When judges take senior status, they create a judicial vacancy for a full-time Active member of the court. Individual wikipages for judges are updated when they take senior status, and the various U.S. District Court pages also make a clear distinction between judges serving an Active and Senior term of service. Per the October 2023 note indicating the need to "update judicial terms in light of resignations, retirements, etc.", this page already requires updating for judges who have transitioned from Active service to full retirement/resignation/death; over the course of those updates, my view is that it would be easy enough for editors to denote Senior Status to remain consistent with the individual judge and U.S. district court pages, based on what is already indicated on those pages. The convention just needs to be established. It would be helpful to hear thoughts from more editors or administrators. Osevilla (talk) 00:08, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notating Senior Status