Talk:The Wedding Singer

message: Perhaps some info about the tradition of the Wedding Singer - host, emcee, entertainer, glorified dj?--Trevor Giles 16:36, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Glenn Works on Wall Street.  That would be a significantly long drive from Ridgefield, CT, but quite manageable from NJ. Sorenlarrington (talk) 17:22, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misc Questions 

message: The Wedding Singer along with others like American Psycho use the arena of the 80s to good comic effect, reflecting and referencing. Is there a list of films set in the 80s, perhaps in particular comedy, which should be put on the end of the article.Bobbyfletch85 20:16, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Films Satirising the 80's

message: :Image:Wedding singer.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Wedding singer.jpg

message: How was it received - critically and at the box office ? -- Beardo (talk) 03:40, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: All we know from the article is its box office performance, which is hardly the same as its "reception".  My guess is that the film received poor reviews due to its unlikeable cast and boring, formulaic plot and script, but I suppose I could be wrong. Guv2006 (talk) 21:33, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Interesting opinion but the fact is the reviews were not negative, not even mixed. The overview provided by Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic indicate that the reviews were generally positive. -- 109.76.192.5 (talk) 00:11, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: What kind of home releases for the movie have there been? I'd assume there was a VHS and standard DVD, but I'm only aware of the Totally Awesome edition DVD and Blu-ray.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.3.113.143 (talk) 00:26, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Both VHS and DVD at the time, Bluray came later (~2009). -- 109.76.192.5 (talk) 00:11, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home Video Releases 

message: I was hoping to add to the production section, but it seems as if no one has even started a production section yet. 
Maybe if someone does start a production section they might include the fact that Carrie Fisher, Judd Apatow, and Adam Sandler did uncredited rewrites of the script. -- 109.78.220.223 (talk) 02:22, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Added Production section. -- 109.79.173.253 (talk) 04:22, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production