lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Penn State Abington

message: I added some more information about Abington based on the PSU-Abington site and my memories of Ogontz. I like the  tag, someone put it on another page I edited, and I used it here. Comments/edits welcome. Rob 02:09, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I said Abby's name a bit too much. I received her scholarship in 1985, and it helped me out a lot. The least I could do is write about her on Wikipedia. Rob 03:25, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrote article 

message: I can find no evidence of any tunnels built as air raid shelters, but there are some steam tunnels . As a consequence I'm removing all mentions of the tunnels until a WP:RS is added that confirm their existence. Sjö (talk) 20:04, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: That's still Penn State University Park, not Abington, which should be obvious to you because your IP address shows that you edit from Abington. And it says nothing about the tunnels being built in WWII. Stop adding false information.Sjö (talk) 20:40, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

text: No, it doesn't because the year in the source is 1961, and there's no mention of the detailed story about  Abby Sutherland building the tunnels. Adding something based on a guess or something implied is expressly proscribed by the Wikipedia policy Wikipedia:No original research. But that doesn't really matter here, because as I've already said, the sources are about Penn State University Park, not Abington. Penn State has 24 campuses where University Park and Abington are in completely different parts of Pennsylvania. This is a map of the Abington campus and this is a map of the University Park campus. The map in your first link is clearly from University Park which you must be aware of since you are at Abington and must know the general layout of your own campus. Also the buildings in the video look like University Park buildings, not Abington ones, which you also must know. Because of this it's impossible for me to assume good faith on your part, and I must draw the conclusion that you deliberately insert factual errors in the article.Sjö (talk), 18 April 2018 
Would it help if I provided my own pictures of the tunnels?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.186.48.182 (talk) 19:29, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

text: Now you're just providing more proof that you are trolling. If you had any pictures of real tunnels you wouldn't have posted links showing some other tunnels at University Park. Please stop your disruptive editing. Disruptive editing, e.g. hoaxing and trolling, can lead to a block. Sjö (talk) 05:33, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tunnels, hoax?
Talk:Uranai Baba

message: in the un-dubed cell games saga in one eppisode Ox-King calls uranai baba his mother
:No. Just... no. He most likely calls her "old woman", which is sometimes translated as "grandmother". But Kame-Sennin is the only known family Baba has. The S 02:53, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good. It sounded off to me. Noneofyourbusiness 00:14, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ox-King
Talk:Misaki Jurai

message: I've assumed Misaki's official family name was supposed to Masaki as with her husband, rather than retaining her mother's name, Kamiki. She is credited with Masaki in Tenchi Muyo! GXP ep. 25, and my kanji searches on Google Japan turn up more results with Masaki in her name than with Kamiki. I have not seen the later episodes of the 3rd OVA series just yet, so if she's referred to as Kamiki officially there I'm just unaware of it (and would like to be clarified if that is the case). EmperorBrandon 03:49, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Masaki or Kamiki?
Talk:-ihah

message: Hignaki: I have been LDS for many, many years, and I didn't know about the "whimsical" usage of this.  After asking a few fellow LDS friends, I think that this assumption is totally wrong, and could even be somewhat deragatory
As a LDS person, I have never heard of any of this.  Where is this sited? Who makes these claims?  What prooof are you offering?  Unless proof is offered to these claims then this article should be deleted. Lobre 00:55, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:De Bruijn graph

message: Could someone describe the set of vertices a bit more clearly please? It is not clear from the example exactly what the pattern is.  
Actually the same goes for the Edges abstract example following. It is not at all clear what this means as the description permits ambiguity. 
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.157.246.18 (talk) 09:42, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vertices 

message: Didn't I read somewhere that mathematics can't be discovered? I mean graphs aren't exactly like animal species where they're waiting in some ethereal plane to be discovered by mathematicians.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.77.137.57 (talk) 19:00, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discovered???

message: The graph examples don't seem to be showing up.
:I don't think that graph is the clearest explanation of De Bruijn graphs. I'll make a new one when I get the chance. --Rajah 18:01, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There are two drawings of De Bruijn graphs already available; the other one is :Image:Debruijngraph.gif. When I made the one now on the page, my intention was not to make a clear drawing of that specific eight-vertex graph (I think the other one is better for that), but rather a drawing that would show the structure of De Bruijn graphs more generally — the same style of drawing generalizes to binary De Bruijn graphs of any dimension.  As I wrote here, the drawing also makes visible some structural properties of De Bruijn graphs (i.e. they are two-queue graphs) and suggests an analogy with dynamical systems. If you think the drawing should be replaced, please keep these considerations in mind when drawing a replacement. —David Eppstein 18:19, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: (later:) I found some published work supporting the dynamical systems analogy and used it as the basis for moving the figure into a new section describing that connection. Feel free to draw something else as the main illustration for the page. —David Eppstein 19:22, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graph Example

message: Is there any evidence that de Bruijn graphs (at least by Good) were not developed at Bletchly Park for cryptographic purposes?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.92.192.199 (talk) 00:47, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  cryptography
Talk:Melanotan/Archive 1

message: What's up with the color coding? It seems silly to me. —Keenan Pepper 04:02, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: * There's been confusion in the media about the melanotan peptides... often times reporters didn't do their homework and so they described melanotan as causing arousal when in reality it's only melanotan II that does. The color helps to clear this up. Netscott 22:13, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought the "II" was enough, but I guess there's nothing wrong with supplementing that with color. Note that you used two colors which appear very similar to people with the most common kinds of color blindness, but it's not that important because the color doesn't convey any extra information. —Keenan Pepper 22:32, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

text: *Somone made an off-handed editorial comment... that was my response... I fully expected that edit to be reverted. Netscott 23:51, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Color coding

message: The article explains (albeit in little depth) some history of Melanotan and Bremelanotide, but fails to explain how the discovery of Melanotan II came about.  Is there any information on its discovery/development? --85.210.60.248 03:00, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs more on Melanotan II

message: This whole page appears to have been taken directly from the manufacturer's web site, and has no citations.  I have no other information to leave, but its' very suspect.  Can anyone provide citations, another party opinion, or just clean this up?
--CKeelty 13:27, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Try watching this report by Campbell Live on TV3 (New Zealand).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.212.16.18 (talk) 03:03, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this just a commercial?

message: Would this be considered a reasonable source? This guy seems to have suffered central serous retinopathy (CSR) related to Melanotan II usage and he does cite two papers where the related alpha-MSH hormone was shown to cause CSR. 67.84.146.125 23:18, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible eye damage associated with Melanotan II, alpha-MSH 

message: I understand this is legal to use in most (all?) countries? If not it would be interesting to know where it is not, and what the efforts are to approve of the sales of it, which is still prohibited atleast in Sweden. 62.84.192.238 06:52, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Approval / Legality
Talk:Frank Welker

message: While this article includes its subject's birth date, the names of his parents, and his father's occupation (more than some "biographical" articles do, e.g., Teresa Ganzel), it then skips right to his career (at least the infobox mentions that he attended Santa Monica College).  There's nothing about siblings, pre-college education, or other formative influences.  About 17 years just vanish.  Surely this information is out there.  Were the fanboys too starry-eyed to look for it? Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 21:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early life
Talk:Romeo-British

message: It's not really clear that this article is "about" Romeo-British; it appears to be mainly about King Arthur.  I'm not completely sure what Romeo-British is supposed to be, but it sounds very similar to Romano-British.  Also, the article really needs a solid reference, as this sounds suspiciously like original research. fbb_fan 20:39, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging with King Arthur or Romano-British, and references
Talk:Kuzhal

message: What is the difference between this flute and the venu used in Carnatic music?  Can this page be moved/consolidated with the venu/Carnatic flute page?  Badagnani 04:16, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Why does the photo show oboes, but the article states that the instrument is a flute?  An oboe and a flute are quite different:  one has a reed and one does not.  Badagnani 14:32, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another question 

message: To add: the spelling in Malayalam as well as other Indian languages from areas where this instrument is used. 173.89.236.187 (talk) 01:38, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Indian spellings
Talk:Pullanguzhal

message: It is clear that Pullanguzhal is an extremly obscure term while the term "Venu" is very common.  If one is not able to draw a distinction between Venu and Pulanguzhall I feel that it deserves nothing more than a reference such as "venu (A.K.A. Pullanguzhal)"
Peace
Tabalji 04:33, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the input.  I have a question:  do you have Dravidian language skills, in order to know that this is a rarely used term?  The thing is that "venu" is a Sanskrit term (thus tied to Hinduism), yet the languages of South India are Dravidian, with likely links to the Indus Valley civilization of ancient times.  The thing is, it isn't clear who first played the Carnatic flute, or whether there were indigenous flutes of similar construction used in folk or classical idioms by Dravidian peoples before the emergence of Carnatic music as we know it.  So it's a complex question.  Badagnani 05:34, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pulanguzhal
Talk:Cherchez la femme

message: The line in Monty Python and the Holy Grail is "Fetchez la vache", not "Cherchez".  (Script page 27, top, handwritten.)  —Tamfang 04:24, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other media appearances 

message: it should be noted for non-French speakers that the 'z' is not pronounced. I'm not familiar with IPA pronunciation rules, but that should be included. Tumacama (talk) 15:13, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: I don't know anything about editing Wikipedia, but this article is completely wrong about the origin of the term. It's a quote from the famous French detective Vidocq, not a Dumas novel.  If anything, Dumas was paraphrasing Vidocq, as the novel was published after Vidocq's death.  Can someone fix this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sidirsi (talk • contribs) 02:25, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your comment. We would need a reliable source to substantiate that: the first source I found in a Google search that addresses this, the Handbook of French Popular Culture edited by Pierre L. Horn (Greenwood Publishing Group, 1991, ), asserts that the phrase first appeared in Dumas' Les Mohicans de Paris, which featured a character based in part on Vidocq, but it makes no claim that Vidocq was known for the phrase.   --Arxiloxos (talk) 07:09, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect article 

message: pardon, what is the meaning of "suss out JJ " ? Perhaps different word or phrase would increase clarity 67.6.27.215 (talk) 19:45, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguous Wording
Talk:Highlander III: The Sorcerer

message: Since it is more widely known as "The Final Dimension", shouldn't the article page by "The Final Dimension" with "The Sorcerer" being the "aka" portion? The posters, DVDs, and television spots all list the title as "TFD" and not "TS". Bignole 14:03, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved to the correct page, seeing as it's called "The Final Dimension" in all USA promotional material, and when it was released here. The other language Wiki's can use the appropriate titles for their countries. Bignole 00:07, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: One could argue in favour of the UK title as well since the English wiki also caters to the British and not just the US. The movie is also a joint UK/French/Canadian production which favours their chosen titles over the US one. The on-screen title on both the UK and Canadian release is Highlander III: The Sorcerer while the French is simply Highlander III. Ferdinandhudson (talk) 17:54, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: The timing for the theatrical cut can't be correct. It should be shorter than either of the US DVD releases. They added the sex scenes thus raising the film to an R rating. Given that, the length of the theatrical cut would be approximately 95 minutes.
The timing for the Argentine release can be removed altogether, many timings they give for that country over at IMDB are the figment of someone's imagination.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferdinandhudson (talk • contribs) 08:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film length 

message: Film goofs in Highlander III: The "New York Airport" with the French only signs and the "Bienvenue a Montréal" (Welcome to Montréal) signs.
Watch the scene at the airport and the French signs and name of Montréal are easily visible.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.215.20.9 (talk) 08:15, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film goofs in Highlander III: The "New York Airport" with the French only signs and the "Bienvenue a Montréal" (Welcome to Montréal) signs.
Talk:Open-air preaching

message: Does anyone else question whether the John 3:16 guy and roadside display sections should be in there?  I'm not entirely certain if they qualify under the classic definition of "open-air preaching," like with folks such as Charles Spurgeon and Ray Comfort.  It's not like the guy is actually talking into the cameras or to the 30,000 folks in the stands. MessengerAtLWU 04:50, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

message: I think there needs to be a scetion about biblical open air preaching. A comment is made in the artical about open air preacher not agreeing with the tactics of other OA preachers.
:Could you elaborate on that statement? Do all Christians agree on doctrine? Of course not. I think that they would also disagree on "tactics". - NoSnooz 14:21, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  biblical open air preaching 

message: I agree that this should not be here.  The article is focusing on verbal open-air preaching, not displays of Biblical themes/etc. 
Askbros 09:06, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roadside religious displays 

message: This article needs heavy editing, with some rewriting, and a better selection of illustrations.
:You must not have heard that Wikipedia articles can be edited as easily as talk pages.Brian0324 14:53, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing
Talk:Mike McManus (columnist)

message: This only presents one side of the story without mitigating details, needs to be balanced. -- Jbamb 05:02, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
Talk:Denis Mitchison

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Andy Walsh (talk) 03:12, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Per this edit to my Talk page, I seem to have erroneously removed content that was tagged as a copyvio. The supposed copyvio source actually took the content from Wikipedia. I have restored the content. --Laser brain (talk) 23:59, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Barrel Full of Monkees

message: :Image:ABFOM.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:37, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:ABFOM.gif
Talk:Sum-over-paths

message: The article stub for sum-over-paths is prefaced by the statment: "It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with path integral formulation."
I don't know who made this suggestion, as a talk page for this doesn't appear to exist. Nevertheless, I'll add my quanta's worth. IMHO, sum-over-paths is such a unique idea, and figures so significantly in interpretation of the Double-slit experiment that it deserves to be an article in its own right.
--Bhruic 05:16, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, this is a duplicate entry. To be merged (or redirected) into the more concise article 'path integral formulation'. Have added the proposed merger header again to restart the discussion. JocK (talk) 03:55, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Kinopanorama

message: I have temporarily removed the external link to the Kinopanorama Music and Vision webpage, as I have changed my Host on 11th April, following which time I began to revise the webpage, so that it is contemporary, with more informative material. The external link will be edited back in approximately seven days from today.--Kinopanorama widescreen 23:42, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation of new webpage

message: Would someone please be so kind as to add a list or table of all known Kinopanorama films in chronological production order, with Russian titles, English titles (in some cases more than one English title), notes as to genre and content etc.; and existence of surviving and restored copies if known, etc.? At present, the article mentions eight travleogues but only names two of them by their English titles (including an alternate title for one of them); it also mentions one dramatic film by its Russian title only, and two Australian films produced in the 1990s. By my reckoning this leaves at least six films completely unidentified, and three only partially identified for people who are not bilingual in English and Russian. 47.147.7.207 (talk) 07:49, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Titles
Talk:The Monkees Present

message: An awful lot of opinions all over this. 74.69.76.195 (talk) 22:55, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, and fixed.--72.34.180.54 (talk) 04:34, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone of the article

message: Songwriting credits should be regular size type, shouldn't they?
I will add " " to the Rhino Handmade reissue, as well as songwriting credits for those tracks, too.
Fantailfan (talk) 14:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Songwriting credits, etc.
Talk:Instant Replay (The Monkees album)

message: I'm sure that many musicologists with perfect 20/20 hindsight have now decreed that everything recorded in the swinging 60s should be classified as 'rock' but it's just plain stupid.  I lived right though the era and this album, just like all the Monkees other recordings, was pure and simple 'Pop'.  It was recorded by a popular group for the purpose of being popular, and popular it was.
Maybe you could get away with calling it rock'n'roll but rock?  Someone needs to get real.--213.208.117.47 (talk) 15:13, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rock?
Talk:Justus (album)

message: It says that The Monkees produced this album which is true, but I've found evidence on other sites that in reality, Michael Nesmith was the one who was primarily responsible for the album's production.
Always knew the Monkees had this album in them, and this is what it sounds like when they actually do everything themselves! The Monkees sound very different on this album than on their 60s and (in Changes' case) 70s albums. Yet they still sound like The Monkees, they just sound older, and different. -- C.Syde (talk | contribs) 23:45, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Producer
Talk:Mansabdar

message: I added a link to Hazari, but apparently this is also a Star Trek term. I don't know how to make a new article with the proper distinction. I don't know how to (or if we should) link to wiktionary in this instance. Pschelden 01:47, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hazari 

message: , this article has been a target of Jhala sock puppets and it needs to be autoconfirmed indefinitely, as there is no way to deal with the IP hopper. - NitinMlk (talk) 20:58, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. - NitinMlk (talk) 21:44, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Page protection