lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rundown

message: Anyone want to help me disambiguate so I can do an article on the Jamaican soup known as rundown? ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:03, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: There is one other way in which the runner can escape being put out: if he runs into one of the fielders who doesn't happen to have the ball at the time, he may benefit from an "interference" call by the umpire.  Good fielders learn to get out of the baseline area as soon as they've thrown the ball so as to avoid this possibility. WHPratt (talk) 16:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Escaping a Rundown 

message: Does anybody else disagree that rundown has overtaken pickle over the years? WikiHogan654 (talk) 12:56, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not I. But I think the game played by three children using two bases deserves a separate article. When I was a kid, we called it "baserunner" and "rundown." I may have heard it called "pickle" as well. A friend of mine tells me it was called "hotbox" when he was a kid. Cf. the Nero Wolfe novel " Prisoner's Base " (the game  Darebase  )which is a similar non-baseball game. (several edits) [Special:Contributions/76.253.72.116|76.253.72.116]] (talk) 01:45, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pickle vs. Rundown 

message: As in, if there's a more advanced runner, the runner in the "pickle" has to remain untagged, even if he's doomed, so as to give time for the more advanced runner to score or at least get to third base.  In fact some rundowns are provoked intentionally for this purpose (a runner trying to steal second when there's a runner on third).
This is also another way (not mentioned in the article) for a rundown to end: if the runner on third scores with the winning run in the bottom of the ninth.
68.196.1.236 (talk) 20:33, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Doesn't Mention the Strategic Aspects of a Rundown
Talk:Sade (film)

message: What does "This serves as a precious prison, where the inmates are referred to the outside world as a patient."  mean?   It looks like the output of a bad computer-translation program.    2001:558:6011:1:E406:4A65:5CD1:785C (talk) 03:45, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garbled text?
Category talk:Dungeons & Dragons books

message: * This page appears to be a bit of a limbo page. Clearly it is here to list the books which form part of the Dungeons and Dragons Role-playing game but it clearly is not complete or even attempts to be complete in any way. Is there any push to have this page fleshed out? Completed? Categorized? (ie by version, topic, etc) Or should it just be removed altogether? Comments? Enigmatical 02:44, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete
Talk:B.O.N.E. Enterpri$e

message: just linked it to Bone Thugs-N-Harmony. no worries :P —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tongue twista (talk • contribs) 02:54, 4 May 2006  (UTC)
:There's nothing here that isn't already in the main Bone Thugs-N-Harmony article. As such I'm simply redirecting this article there. --AbsolutDan (talk) 18:22, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE: Merging
Talk:Tom Walkinshaw Racing

message: The reason as to why the TWR/MG Rover Collaboration collapsed is NOT because MGR couldn't pay the bills. The real reason was because the that the racing arm of TWR was performing poorly in Formula 1, and the company were making major losses. In fact MGR were paying the bills on time, but TWR was shifting the money it was making from the car developments side to the racing side. Eventually the losses were amounting to so much that they couldn't even pay their basic fixed costs.
The company went bust and with it, liquidators took the RDX60 project with them. TWR owned the intellectual property rights for the new car. As far as I know, MGR spent a budget of £300 million and the project had almost passed the digital mock-up stage. Indeed, many parts manufacturers were already producing parts for the prototype for the new body. Had it have got past this stage the RDX60 would be in existance today in full production form. £100 million had to be paid to liquidators to get back the design development data that the company needed to continue to develop the products in house.
Some guys at the MGR Product Design Centre said that the decision to get TWR to control the design development was a bad idea as they felt that the whole system was inefficient, and they believed that they could have done a better job if everything had been done under one studio. Ultimately, the downfall of TWR led to the unravelling of the RDX60 plan to produce a decent replacement to the MG ZS/Rover 45 models. As we now all know, other poor management decision culminated into what we now know today, but the ultimate one was to hand development to TWR.
:Source it, and add it to the article. The talk page is not a forum, nor a place for personal winge-ing. This section should be deleted. --Falcadore (talk) 03:52, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  TWR/MG Rover Collaboration 

message: Since when was TWR a F3000 team --Falcadore (talk) 03:52, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Formula 3000

message: Just a question - should the present company, Tom Walkinshaw Performance Group be separated into its own article? There were several years between the death of TWR and the establishment of TWPG. --Falcadore (talk) 07:11, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  TWPG 

message: There needs to be better delineation between the end of TWR and the start of Walkinshaw Performance. The V8 Supercar section in particular reads more as though it belongs in the WP articles rather than in TWR. --Falcadore (talk) 10:10, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: TWR/WP

message: Think what you glossary, WP Abby Walking Page, MG Abby Micro Glob, do need money, say Bank  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.59.76.126 (talk) 19:33, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  TWR
Talk:Sullivan Ballou

message: I cannot read Sullivan's letter to Sarah and maintain dry eyes or an even voice. The thoughts of this man and the poignancy of his situation speak across the ages, from his day into ours. knoodelhed 08:04, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: General

message: Does anyone have information on whatever became of Sarah, and her two children, Edgar and Willie, during and after the war?
John Paul Parks (talk) 17:30, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Later Developments

message: How can his wife, Sarah, be buried next to him if his body was never found?  Bill the Cat 7 (talk) 22:55, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Charred ash and bone were collected and believed to be his remains.  That is what was buried, as described in the article.  --Trippz 06:14, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Flora, Oregon

message: * I visited this ghost town (passed through, actually) as a teen in 1970, while traveling with my family to visit my grandparents, who owned a ranch on the mountaintop near Troy, Oregon.  It made quite an impression on me, having never seen a real ghost town before. Mmoyer 03:05, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *The USGS says that Flora is a populated place (unincorporated community), so it isn't a ghost town. Jsayre64 (talk) 16:37, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ghost town also can mean a populated town which has a greatly decreased population from earlier years.  —EncMstr (talk) 21:41, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Created 
Talk:Sphingosine kinase

message: I noticed that alot of the text on this page is a direct copy and paste from the cited articles. I'm not sure if there is a policy on this, since the article is referenced.
Hopefully this is not an issue, since as you mentioned the articles are referenced.  It didnt make much sense to me to try and write my own text to summarize the authors already well written work. --Onefishtwofish 13:06, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:COPY a direct copy without quote could lie on the border of plagiarism. Anyhow, a verbatim copy of the text, including invisible references ("see Refs. [3–6]" here) can be confusing. That is why I checked the talk page ;) Banus 08:21, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright
Talk:XFA-27A

message: Even though the article is marked as a copyright violation, the information written by Fonce is non-canon and should not be construed as such. Only information obtained directly from the game or Namco sources (including official strategy guides) should be used as a basis for this article. Fonce's article is a clear example of Fan fiction and not a valid source. This should be considered for future edits or additions to other Ace Combat articles. IdoAlphaOmega 03:13, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Trumwine of Abercorn

message: Why must there be a footnote in every sentence (but three) and more than one in some? It seems excessive. Just put all sources in the references section unless some information is particularly controversial or uncertain. It preserves more flow. If there is some good reason for this, fine, but I can't see it. 
[Note that I am not raising the issue of using "Alt Clut" in preference to "Strathclyde" when the former is very obscure usage to most English ears. I'm done with naming controversies on Scotland-related articles.]
Srnec 03:25, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason Strathclyde is not used is that it is inaccurate, it never appears in any sources until it appears in the Annals of Ulster in the late 9th century. It remains possible that Strathclyde is only the name for the Scoto-Norse Kingdom that emerged after the Viking sack of Alt Clut. Alt Clut is actually the name of the Kingdom in the sources, and is preferred by historians dealing with the pre-Viking sack. As for notes, what harm do they do? That's the way wiki is going; I would have thought it would be better to praise me for putting the extra work in to have them, than to complain about them. They also, BTW, make it more difficult for future editors to put in inaccurate information. - Calgacus (ΚΑΛΓΑΚΟΣ) 10:42, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Dark Age/Early Medieval History kinda necessitates use of sources. The info on Trumwine, for instance, comes from two texts, the HE and VCuth. So saying what you got where, and distinguishing info in a primary source from the suggestions of a modern historian are vital to a interested reader's understanding. The articles on tenth and eleventh century kings use Strathclyde - Alt Clut  is not mentioned after the 9th century until the late 12th century (it might be thirteenth, not sure), when it is the Gaelic "Dumbarton" shifting between the Scottish Kings and the Earls/Mormaers of Lennox. - Calgacus (ΚΑΛΓΑΚΟΣ) 17:54, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John L. Jerstad

message: Just want to highligh on the nickname for John Jerstad as killer
Please note that in the Air Force Link no such nickname was noted. 
http://www.af.mil/history/person.asp?dec=&pid=123006487
Instead the nickname killer was assigned to John R. Kane
Please refer http://www.af.mil/history/person.asp?dec=&pid=123006489
Thank you
Bankrobber (talk) 03:57, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kadayanallur

message: in kadayanallur have lot of areas.pattai is one of the area which is most muslim staying in kadayanallur.and melakadayanallur,muthukrishnapuram,kirusnapuram,center area (called by kadayanallur) and mavadikal. In mavadical all of cost is mixing muslims and nayaker (yathava) and more. They are friendship in their's.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.229.241.178 (talk) 07:08, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  areas 
Talk:Princess Krishna

message: Merge this page with draupadi, but remember that nothing is left out. Just remove the redundant data, but be careful that information is not lost.nids(♂) 06:17, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: i.e. exactly what i said. Merge this page, but be careful about the loss.nids(♂) 07:41, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Krishna in the Mahabharata

message: Krishna killed Narakasura, Kamsa and Lord Skanda killed Banasura. This should be mentioned here. Vishal Kandasamy (talk) 16:31, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Narakasura and Banasura Vadh 

message: This article presently features a lot of copy pasted content from an English translation of the Mahabharata, which has also not been properly cited. This content could be accurately paraphrased in an editor's own words and added the appropriate citations wherever necessary.
I also believe that a chronological timeline of the events in which the deity participated in the epic would be a very useful inclusion in this article, and the article itself could be organised in this manner.
Finally, the section regarding the historical worship of Vasudeva-Krishna bears no relevance to the rest of the article and could be deleted, as an entirely different article already exists to cover it. Chronikhiles (talk) 05:27, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed changes 
Talk:Robot Alchemic Drive

message: Isn't this the last game Enix published in the West? Should it be mentioned in the article? --Mika1h (talk) 23:49, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It can be mentioned if it's reliably sourced. Kariteh (talk) 13:25, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Enix game in the West?
Talk:3:10 to Yuma (1957 film)

message: 3:10 to Yuma should go directly to the 2007 film. Major critics have lauded the film as being better than the 1957 version. Moreover, the 1957 version was a not-so-familiar western with little hype until the recent version kicked off. The acting list in the 2007 version by itself propels the recent version into more importance. This is not a case of "recentism."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Infinity529 (talk • contribs) 02:38, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, Unsigned, you are certainly entitled to your opinions.  However, this is not the place to discuss them.  Wikipedia isn't a forum for your personal likes and dislikes. -CaptainJae 12:42, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: The plot summary quite overlooks the psychology of the characters, particularly Ben Wade's, which is what the story is really about. Bed Wade can be a charming seducer, which we see in his treatment of the barmaid (whom he beds). That he and Evans are holed up in the hotel's honeymoon suite (!!!) can be taken as a sly wink at the audience. (I assume this was taken from Elmore Leonard's short story.) A modern remake might very well suggest that Wade "swings both ways", and that his attempt to seduce Evans is as much motivated by sex as it is by the desire to regain his freedom.
Regardless, the plot summary misses the most-important element of the film -- the characters' motivations.
After writing the preceding, I read the short story. It is startlingly thin and dull. Elmore Leonard criticized the film for showing "how Hollywood can screw up a simple story", but the story is much too simple. The screenwriter did a great job of expanding the story -- and the characters -- in interesting ways. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 20:29, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: psychology
Talk:Cheeky Angel

message: I was just wondering if anyone had seen the anime "Cheeky Angel." I have just recently started watching it and think its a very good show. Everything about it is very good. The plot is very interesting and the characters are so cool. I think its a super show and I wonder what other people think of it.
Hello guys, I have to cut the spoilers part because it's just TOO dangerous for first-time viewers of Tenshi na Konamaiki. Hope you understand. 61.9.74.35 08:14, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First header

message: The spoilers by the way are heavily RELATED to the ending of the series and I just don't want people to be spoiled in viewing it. Thank you.61.9.74.35 08:16, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cutting spoilers is fine, but don't strip the article naked.  The main character descriptions should have farm more than 2 lines of text....  Especially for a popular anime  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.49.235.12 (talk) 07:21, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cutting the spoilers 

message: I was wondering if theres a dicussion page where poeple who've seen all the anime can talk about it. cuz there are a few things i from the ending that i was wondering if others got too.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Enixspirit (talk • contribs) 19:03, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there a Discussion 

message: I won't go into details because it would spoil the story, but the Story section should be re-written because it is misleading and inaccurate. If I can find the time I will write up a revision, but that might take a while, mainly because it won't be simple to write a Story line that isn't a spoiler.
I put this here because, I am not sure how to put it in the main article, either as original research, or a clear precis. It is VERY misleading. Megumi Amatsuka was NEVER a boy. She wanted to be a boy so that she could protect her friend, so she acted like a boy. This is confirmed at the end of the Manga where she says that she didn't think that she was ever a boy, and her friend (Miki) said that she definitely hadn't ever been a boy. The Anime, which is based on the Manga, doesn't make this clear. So, what was going on with her perception that she had been changed to a girl? Perhaps it was the realisation that she could not hide this any more, and she rationalised it as her masculinity having been stolen. Kuitan (talk) 14:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Story section is misleading 
Talk:Across the Bridge (short story)

message: Added plot section to fulfill cleanup.TheHappiestCritic (talk) 10:04, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sections
Talk:Dennis F. Rasmussen

message: Despite being POV and poorly formatted, this article does relate to a legitimate canditate in the Ohio US Senate race. It does need editing, but to delete it outright seems too harsh for an otherwise useful article. I suggest allowing it to stay, and tagging it for clean up and POV editing. A search for Dennis Rasmussen on Wiki leads to a baseball pitcher; perhaps a disambig is in order? Consequentially 03:51, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: User: Dshlos seems to be engaging in some disruptive reverting, but I've warned his talk page so we might report him to admins should he keep it up. I've rewritten the page to be as POV as possible, listing what can be verified from sources that aren't related to Rasmussen's web page. I'll add more content as I can find it, and attempt to make something at least a little worthwhile out of this page. Consequentially 04:26, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Software craftsmanship

message: "Software is the means by which all human effort can finally cease" - Software Evangelist Gifford Watkins.
The real craft of software programming lies in database structure.  Creating from scratch every possible reoccuring human activity within an organization requires due diligence.  Software is then becomes the rat's maze, created to channel individual desire toward the reward, and eliminating repetitive tasks.
==
I've made an edit to make this page more neutral and more about the facts of software craftsmanship: it's inspired by a fairly small set of books and it's also the title of one of these books. There's a potential conflict of interest since I'm the co-author of one of these books.Ade oshineye (talk) 08:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It certainly would. The article also needs to demonstrate that this is more than just a term which is preferred to "software engineering", and that Software Craftsmanship describes a coherent and consistent set of activities that are distinct from Software Engineering. Simply demonstrating that the term "Software Craftsmanship" has been used several times is not enough.--Michig (talk) 17:38, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Software Craftmanship

message: Robertwharvey has called the notability of this page into question. Does anybody have any good reliable secondary sources that could be used to indicate the notability of software craftsmanship? Ade oshineye (talk) 23:25, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think notability has been sufficiently addressed in the article since this comment.  References to several books, articles, and conferences have been included. - Michael (talk) 19:33, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. The article has been expanded considerably since the banner was added, and just looking at the set of references and links shows that the term is in widespread use. Banner now removed. -- Hymek (talk) 19:29, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Pieris bryoniae

message: Sometimes it is considered a semispecies, modification, variety, etc. The author had the opportunity to observe populations of the dark-veined white in the Carpathians and the Alps and is of the opinion that it is an independent species.
: Please add back with citation if needed. Shyamal 03:58, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if anyone has studied the northernmost Green-veined whites in such detail.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.153.63.213 (talk) 12:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed from page
Talk:Randal Graves

message: I added the fact that Randal was watching Transgender porn in the trivia list.
JaMiE P 04:10, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transgender porn 

message: I changed Randal's DOB, 'Clerks.' was set on Saturday the 10th of April, 1993. Dante mentions the age of the girl who died as "22, the same as us". 1993 minus 22 equals 1971. not 1974 (It is possible that he was born anytime between April 11, 1970 and April 9, 1971.. but not sure if I should put "1970 or 71" in or just assume 1971.)
 Dangaz 12:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But if he's 32 or 33 in Clerks II which is set in 2006, the 1971 thing doesn't work. And Clerks II can't take place in 2003 because of all the references to Return of the King which wouldn't come out until December of that year. At the very very earliest the movie takes place in Spring or Summer 2004 but even that's unlikely due to the all the talk of the upcoming Transformers. I think Clerks II pretty clearly does take place in roughly 2006 and I'm not sure how that can be correlated to it being thirteen years after Clerks takes place and Randal having only aged ten or eleven years
It must take place around 2004, as Elias and the Star Wars-hating fanboy state that Return of the King just swept the Oscars, and Elias says that "Transformers" has not begun filming but will be awesome. Note that a planned pre-production of Transformers was to begin, but it was put on hold. The fanboy also talks about "Mannequin Skywalker" ruining Episode 2, but Randal says that Episode 3 will top the whole series, which is true since Revenge of the Sith did not come out until 2005. In addition, when Pickle Fucker (Jason Lee) comes into Moobys', he says to Randal "32, and you're flipping burgers?" Hence Dante and Randal are 32, and since they are 22 in 1994 during the events of Clerks, this must be set in 2004.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.206.128 (talk) 19:09, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 

message: This statement seems wrong or at lesat misleading:
"but ruins Dante's engagement by congratulating store manager Becky on her pregnancy"
as he annoys Becky by congratulating her (but before the donkey show arrives) but its Jay that ruins the engagement and show by mistakenly congratuating Dante's g/f, during the donkey show.
also:
"Everyone in the restaurant is arrested."
which is not strictly true as Becky is there but runs out, and is seen to keep her job, is not seen in the jail scenes and i cant imagine would have kept her job otherwise.
super nitpicky i know.. but well..  just watch the film and feel the need to stick my oar in. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 90.200.108.60 (talk) 20:56, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strictly true?