lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:2000 United States presidential primaries

message: The map of the Republican primary winners has an error.  New Mexico is shown as having been won by McCain instead of its neighbor Arizona.  McCain won Arizona, not New Mexico. TheUnknown285 (talk) 15:49, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Map Error

message: Some of the English in this article is middle-school bad. I cleaned up the first small section about the Democratic Primary, but run-ons and strange constructions abound in the rest still.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.132.4.72 (talk) 18:43, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup, still

message: I edited the part about Rove and push poll incident. Thanks, --Tom 18:01, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted the clearly sourced content you deleted, as per our discussion at Talk:Karl Rove. Cheers. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 21:47, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced commentary, material

message: This article is in some serious need of clean-up. It should only take ten minutes to get rid of the major errors, when I have more time I'll get back here and see what I can do. --Mr.crabby (Talk) 02:13, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up
Talk:HeHalutz

message: Clearly this is an article yet to be written.  Amongst many other topics, the Bolshevik credentials of the early organization need to be delineated. Zerotalk 11:17, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Ben-Gurion&oldid=615990188#Biography says, "On his arrival he and Ben Zvi went on a tour of 35 cities in an attempt to raise a pioneer army, Hechalutz, of 10,000 men to fight on Turkey's side.Teveth, Shabtai (1985) Ben-Gurion and the Palestinian Arabs. From Peace to War. Oxford University Pres. . pp. 25, 26.", which should be mentioned, if accurate. Superm401 - Talk 05:06, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

text: Yeah, the matter is complicated by the considerable number of organizations with the same name. I don't have time to sort it out. Zerotalk 14:09, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing 

message: A "chalutz" is a Zionist, or proto-Zionist, pioneer. There is no mandatory connection to the specific HeHalutz organisation, which was founded some 20 years after the first chalutzim of Hovevei Zion had already become active. Therefore, the automatic Wiki redirect from Chalutz to HeHalutz is plain wrong. "Ch-" is how German-influenced late-19th - early 20th-century orthography spelled "H", so "Chalutz" should by all means redirect to Halutz and nothing else.Arminden (talk) 14:21, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. WP:SOFIXIT. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 15:35, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Chalutz" redirect is WRONG
Talk:Comandra

message: The taxonomy here is a bit messed up, I've found various references to the number of species and sub-species.  I'm not exactly sure how to treat this.  I just wanted to get the page started since it is a common species and of economic importance since it is the alternate host for the comandra blister rust.  And it's got a funny name.  Stealth cat 18:07, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Terminology used in the reference ("semiparasitic") isn't very precisely defined (beyond "more or less parasitic"), but it's clearly not holoparasitic. Not clear if it's an obligate or facultative parasite. Changed "not obligate" to "not holoparasitic" Plantdrew (talk) 02:44, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hemiparasitic is the correct word to describe this plant and I have changed it accordingly. Wasp32 (talk) 21:21, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

message: @Dr vulpes I think your TNC status template may be confused since this is a genus and a species. It is not displaying currently. MtBotany (talk) 19:50, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the catch, that's my mistake when I was adding the template. I'll go back and add some logic to prevent that from happening and review my previous edits. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 20:38, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You are welcome, @Dr vulpes. Your template is quite a good idea. MtBotany (talk) 20:41, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, at first I wanted to write a bot but when I submitted my request it was suggested that I do this instead and I have to admit it is a MUCH better system then having a bot update everything. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 07:36, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  TNCStatus
Talk:Adath Jeshurun Congregation

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism#Deletion of synagogue articles. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 09:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion about notability of synagogues

message: Hello.  I'm a member of Adath.  Rabbi Brusso left several years ago; he now heads up his own congregation near New York City.  Instead, our assistant rabbis is Rabbi Aaron S Weininger.  
-- Shellie Specter
cjunktwo@gmail.com  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.245.196.197 (talk) 01:19, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  changes
Talk:Euston Square tube station

message: 'In December 2005...' What is the current state of play (almost nine years later)? Jackiespeel (talk) 21:49, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates

message: I expected to find an explanation for the reason why this station was not built to connect to Euston, but it is not at all clear. It seems to be saying that the Met was trying to raise funds for another station beside Euston. But why didn't they build it there in the first place? They would surely have expected to capture traffic from the mainline. I realise that the tube line companies then were competitors who did each other no favours but the text is really unclear. It would be nice to know why we have to climb the escalator, go out in the rain for ten minutes, then down the steps. Could someone improve, please? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:42, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inadequate/unclear explanation for reason why this station was not built to connect to Euston.
Talk:Thryallis

message: Please discuss here or fact tag specific concerns.  The article has references, and the references appear to support the article almost to the point of being copied.  So, the entire article should not be tagged unreferenced.  If you have concerns about something specific, post it here.  --KP Botany (talk) 03:35, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreference article tag reversion
Talk:RMS St Helena (1989)

message: I have started the infobox but it is still missing quite a lot of detail, I will try as time allows to complete it.  Also have tried to tidy the article up and give it a more defined structure, as well as adding detail.
Chrisc le (talk) 00:44, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ship infobox 

message: May not be an RS (since it seems to be a college professor's personal page?) but I found http://mcee.ou.edu/bweaver/Ascension/sh-rms.htm
WhisperToMe (talk) 22:18, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal website w images of the ship, including onboard culture 
Talk:Gallions Reach DLR station

message: Recent DLR ridership numbers for 2019/2018/2017 etc are available, but I have no idea how to add them into the infobox. Any help?Turini2 (talk) 19:40, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ridership
Talk:Town council

message: Any information about the powers town and parish councils usually have would be useful for this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.241.65.0 (talk) 18:20, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are referring to UK town councils, look at Civil parish#Powers and functions. G-Man ? 23:51, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Powers

message: Both pages seem to talk about both topics, which share enough in common that they should probably just all be discussed in one place.  talk 05:34, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[City council]] with [[Town council]]
Talk:Goodge Street tube station

message: "The TARDIS narrowly avoids becoming engulfed in a web-like substance in space. It then arrives in the London Underground railway system, the tunnels of which are being overrun by the web and by the Great Intelligence's robot Yeti."
Goodge Street was one of the underground stations for the setting :)   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingkong77 (talk • contribs) 13:13, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doctor who - The web of fear 

message: Is it pronounced with a short or long [u]?--Imz (talk) 18:17, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Standard British English is long [oo]. best, Sunil060902 (talk) 18:46, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you!--Imz (talk) 00:50, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

text: Can you give a source for that? best, Sunil060902 (talk) 23:52, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronunciation 

message: The article states that "The platforms still retain the tiling pattern of the original Charing Cross, Euston & Hampstead Railway (CCEHR) company".  But I don't think this is correct -- the tiling on the platforms clearly dates from the 1980s.  WillNL (talk) 14:23, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Platform tiles 

message: The following was previously in the section on the deep-level air-raid shelter:
: In addition, General Eisenhower did not make any D Day announcement broadcast from the Goodge Street Station or any commercial radio station.  He first sent an encoded dispatch to President Roosevelt and then called Prime Minister Churchill.  His decision to launch the invasion was made from his invasion headquarters at Southwick House, near Portsmouth.  Check www.historyarticles.com.
This looks to me like someone's attempt to correct a former error, but it doesn't make much sense in the article as it stands now. If it's relevant (if there is, for example, a common claim that Eisenhower did make the D-Day announcement from the Goodge Street shelter), it should be restored with a citation in a manner that makes sense. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 04:57, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed
Talk:Gunnersbury station

message: Should there be some mention of the building being close by - this is a relevant reference. Jackiespeel (talk) 13:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  BSI
Talk:Liverpool Guild of Students

message: There seems to be a dispute over LSMedia's site views, with the usage of subjective words such as "mere" and "impressive". Also, it seems that the figures do not have any official citations. A former LSMedia editor has notified me that the figures quoted are incorrect and are possibly being used to falsely boost the CV of current editorship. Yeebles 17:00, 28/04/2012 (UTC)
The University of Liverpool Guild of Students recently passed an unanimous resolution to change its name to Liverpool Guild of Students. I was wondering if an administrator could change the title of the article to reflect that change? Fdsre 18:26, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Borotbists

message: The page should remain at Borotbists according to WP:NAME, because that is how the party is commonly referred to in academic texts.  Google favours the term 140 to 1 in English-language pages (this becomes 400:1 if we remove Wikipedia results). —Michael Z. 2007-08-15 18:28 Z
* Borotbists -"Ukrainian Communist Party (Borotbists)" — 420 results
* "Ukrainian Communist Party (Borotbists)" — 3 results
Statement of left and anarchist organizations about “Borotba” organization (English, German, Polish, French, Serbo-Croatian, Lithuanian)
http://avtonomia.net/2014/03/03/statement-left-anarchist-organizations-borotba-organization/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.223.9.209 (talk) 14:15, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move back to "Borotbists"
Talk:Friedrich-Wilhelm Müller

message: This is exactly the same as Friedrich-Wilhelm Müller so can we delet it and divert all the links to the other one. I am not sure how this is done.
:this is the talk page for that article, to discuss ways to improve it.  also, please sign your comments with for tilde's  ( ~~~~ ) it puts your user name so we can keep track of whose posting what.  --Rocksanddirt 18:36, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, now I understand.  I'm not sure how either.  just blanking and redirecting the other page is not great, unless there is only a short edit history, as wikipedia likes to keep it all together if possible.  maybe we need to ask an administrator how to do it.  --Rocksanddirt 18:38, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article states
"Müller ended the war in East Prussia where he surrendered to the Red Army."
However according to the German wikipedia he surrendered in what is now lower Saxony to British troops who would later hand him over to Greek authorities. These events seem more likely, however even if they are not, both wiki entries are contradicting each other here. 2A02:908:1084:BFE0:7DED:E32C:382D:2AB7 (talk) 21:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of surrender
Talk:Hanger Lane tube station

message: I do not know the history but the article says the tracks were bought from the GWR. However there is still an NR single track of the New North main line (which I think a few years ago had disconnected bits of its second track in situ). Was the NNML originally 4-track? The full or partial splitting/transfer/whatever needs to be clarified.--SilasW (talk) 11:47, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My understanding is the the NNML in the 1900s was two track, the original E&SBR to Ealing Broadway (1917) was also two track. In 1938 the GWR built two new tracks along the  E&SBR as far west as North Acton junction, as was. Then in 1964 those two new tracks closed after barely 25 years of use. When North Acton was reconstructed the new eastbound platform was built partially on the trackbed of the "old" "new" tracks. But, additionally, in 1947 the Central line took over two new tracks between North Acton and Ruislip that had already been built by the GWR pre-war as part of the New Works Programme. These had always been intended for use by LU, just that the War intervened. Hope that helps! best, Sunil060902 (talk) 10:29, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually the original Park Royal was way to the east, east of the Piccadilly line over bridge! I have rewritten the whole history bit! best, Sunil060902 (talk) 11:31, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading history
Talk:High Street Kensington tube station

message: It has never been an "tube" station or been used by tube station stock. In fact only subsurface metro has been using it and it is in the open air. It has known steam traction.  Why not call it: High Street Kensington station?  Smiley.toerist (talk) 22:47, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: We know... but per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (UK stations) and Wikipedia:WikiProject London/Naming conventions, any station which has London Underground and no other rail operator is a "tube station". Just look at the others in  and . --Redrose64 (talk) 22:55, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has never been a tube station.
Talk:Ickenham tube station

message: The reason why it is the least used is data compared to the other stations on the Piccadilly line hence citation needed is not necessary  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.244.130 (talk) 20:07, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Least used
Talk:Washington School Information Processing Cooperative

message: I think this article name should be edited (or even changed). Since WSIPC is an acronym, it should either read as WSIPC (not Wsipc as it is currently), or the the name should be changed to reflect the entire name verbatim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WSIPC (talk • contribs) 19:18, 18 December 2014‎
:The name of this article is already "Washington School Information Processing Cooperative" - where are you seeing it as "Wsipc"? --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:27, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I read the article about mission statements and I'm uncertain as to whether the mission statement on this page is necessary or not. At first glance, it doesn't seem promotional to me, but I'd like a secondary opinion about it, since the only reference to it, currently, is the official company website--GreatMink67 (talk) 19:08, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not intended to serve as free webhost for information, that should be hosted on the organization's own website (including mission statements, product and partner lists, and other overly detailed internal information) - see also WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Information about a topic should only include a dispassionate succinct description based on reliable 3rd-party sources, not on self-promotional PR declarations. A mission statement, by its very nature, includes no encyclopedic information. GermanJoe (talk) 01:35, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mission Statement
Talk:Knightsbridge tube station

message: It is the only tube station on the London Underground network to have six consecutive consonants in its name.
Aldwych.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.221.126.172 (talk) 22:56, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In the case of Aldwych there are two syllables and in the second (wych) the y is a vowel. --Redrose64 (talk) 00:01, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

text: These six consonants in a row make the word unique in the English language. I would think this fact notable enough to be included in the article, but strangely, no, at least not yet. David Spector (talk) 00:38, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Six consonants in a row don't make it unique, there are others (e.g. catchphrase) and it's trivia, which we try to avoid.--DavidCane (talk) 18:05, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consonants
Talk:Race and ethnicity in U.S. labor law

message: The information currently on this article is wrong.  Contrary to what is being said in this article, the source that is being used as a citation for this article shows that Hispanics are being asked as a separate question from race.  The EEO does not conceive race and ethnicity any differently from the US Census. This article is a content fork of that article----DarkTea© 18:38, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nonsense. Which exactly sentence is "contrary"? I cut and pasted the whole section directly from EEO document (given in ref). Go sue US Gov, not me. If you say that they use the same as US census, reference, please, and I will happily delete this article myself: I take no special pride or glory in it. `'Míkka 21:51, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The EEOC uses the same race and ethnicity system that the US Census uses because both are endorsed by the Office of Management and Budget.  Page five says "the employer invites the employee to voluntarily self-identify their race or ethnicity" and page 4 says that Hispanic is "regardless of race", so race and ethnicity are being conceived as distinct concepts.  People who report to their employer that they are a Hispanic do not have to be tallied as a race.  The clarification "(Not Hispanic or Latino)" following the racial names means that if the person does not identify as a Hispanic then the employer tallies them as their race.  Although the information in this article is accurate, the EEOC uses the same race and ethnicity system as the US Census, so this article is a content fork of the Race (United States Census).----DarkTea© 23:25, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Once again: you say "the same race and ethnicity system". Proof, please, in form of reliable source. My opinion: Census was in 2000. It used some system. The system is described in the "Census'2000". This EEO version claimed to be updated in 2007. It is described  (possibly incompletely).  At this moment I don't know and don't care where it originated, and I have no reason to take your word without references. I do not exclude the possibility that both US Census and EEO are based on some common governmental regulations.  I will no further discuss your opinion until you deliver any proofs. I am not an expert in US race and not pretend to be. `'Míkka 23:44, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fork

message: What is this article about? The US Census defines races. We have excellent articles on discrimination based on gender, sex, race, national origin, sexual orientation and whatever else somebody thinks is possible. At this point, I am unable to see what this article contains that is any value to Wikipedia. If anybody knows, please make some changes so it will be evident. Thanks, (Eddie 02:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry. My bad. the point is that EEO amended its definitions of race and ethnicity to mathc the US Census Bureau definitions only in 2007. I forgot to add sections about the previous versions of the definitions. `'Míkka 03:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement of Purpose
Talk:Sánchez

message: How about Franz Sanchez; are fictional characters allowed?  82.128.241.165 22:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Franz Sanchez

message: --89.50.1.64 (talk) 14:14, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Signature from 2010 Comment Deleted by IP edit in 2015

message: The name is stressed on the first syllable (as the Spanish spelling implies), changed the IPA transcription accordingly. Wathiik (talk) 16:08, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Stress

message: Some of the disambiguated names listed have the wikilink piped and some don't, which is correct? --Jameboy (talk) 12:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pipe or not?
Template talk:Virginia colonial governors

message: Should the current Commonwealth flag be used for a list of pre-Commonwealth colonial governor's of the Virginia Colony?  Perhaps a royal shield or flag would be more appropriate? VirginiaProp 18:48, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you know of any pre Commonwealth flag then you are welcome to change it. T Rex | talk 00:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a not a flag, but there are several versions of the Seal of the Colony of Virginia.  The problem is that there is a Virginia Company seal before 1624 that is substantially different than the Royal Colony seal used later.  I have a couple of versions I found off the web, but I need to find some that can be uploaded without attribution problems. VirginiaProp 01:06, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If they are that old then they should most certainly be in the public domain by now. T Rex | talk 01:31, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Found and done: the Library of Congress had microfilm scans of some old proclamations issued in the late 18th century which had the Virginia Coat of Arms on it (as used by these Governors), which is now gracing the infobox! Morgan Riley (talk) 18:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Cheonan Station

message: It is nothing short of madness to put this up for deletion.  JPBarrass (talk) 15:05, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion 
Talk:Lifehacker

message: Not that this is relevant to the page on LH in any way, but there's an article on How to contribute to wikipedia on LH now. Also, please feel free to delete this content if it turns out to be really useless.
-- Mayuresh 18:49, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lifehacker talks about wikipedia 

message: somewhere here it needs to be mentioned that lifehacker is total garbage, written naively, half the time with technically incorrect information.  when this happens, instead of admitting their mistake, and labelling their correction as such, they actually label it as an "update", as if they couldn't have known it at the time of writting.  this is just one of many things about the site which make it absolute garbage.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.244.73.17 (talk) 15:48, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if you can find reliable sources that offer such criticism, feel free to add information to the article. Otherwise, go complain elsewhere. Esrever (klaT) 16:23, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  criticism 

message: This article does not use its sources properly. A proper rewrite would be a good idea for this article. Anyone wants to effort into this? Talktrue (talk) 23:54, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "This article does not use its sources properly." How so? FuFoFuEd (talk) 04:55, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 