lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Comet

message: the Word nuclei and the Nucleus should have a disambiguation as this will cause confusion 122.53.185.85 (talk) 21:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comet Nuclei 

message: The redirect ☄️ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 18:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:☄️]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: I’m not smart enough to know if this is accurate or not. However, the problem is that this isn’t cited or otherwise referenced. The idea that there are any particles(non-quantum) unaffected by gravity contradicts every physics course I’ve taken. Can someone explain this better in the article? 71.235.216.2 (talk) 03:36, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Gas + particles often exceed escape velocity when leaving a comet. A fart could escape most comets. -- Kheider (talk) 12:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gravitationally unbound?
Talk:Computer architecture

message: You changed the short description from "Set of rules and methods that describe the functionality, organization, and implementation of computer systems" to just "Set of rules and methods".
Computer architectures are not the only sets of rules and methods in existence; is that short description too short, so as not to say anything about what computer architectures, in particular, are? Guy Harris (talk) 20:46, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: With short descriptions, we have a situation where we are aiming to have a maximum of 40 characters. The driving reason is that the short description is displayed on the mobile access to the article in a search result. 65% of access to Wikipedia is now via mobile devices or tablets. So we have that objective to display a short description that is readable on the mobile device. Descriptions over 40 characters get chopped off. With your forbearance, I ask, "What would you suggest?" --Whiteguru (talk) 22:19, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  "Set of rules describing computer system".  39 characters. Guy Harris (talk) 22:36, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well scribed! --Whiteguru (talk) 01:50, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short description now *too* short?
Talk:Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

message: Hi everyone,
I noticed recently that the CDC webpage has been revamped and the organization has released a new version of their logo. I reached out to their general information e-mail, and a representative confirmed that the new logo is “the updated logo for CDC in general”. Can anyone locate (or create) a .SVG logo equivalent so that the article’s infobox logo may be updated? Thanks! L337p4wnTalk to me! 19:09, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New logo
Talk:Citric acid cycle

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — mw (talk) (contribs) 22:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Citric acid cycle →  – per WP:COMMONNAME
see the ngrams: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Citric+acid+cycle%2CKrebs+cycle&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3 Abo Yemen✉ 16:22, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Molecular Biology has been notified of this discussion. Bensci54 (talk) 17:43, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 December 2023
Talk:Chiang Kai-shek

message: ‎re: the pondering in the diffs by @‎LeonChrisfield et al, now I've got to wondering: how exactly is it debatable? He wanted to be in China, he saw himself as important to China, but he was kicked out of China (as it were) and he was not allowed to return to China. That seems squarely like 'exile' to me, but I suppose the word does feel a bit over-incisive. Remsense聊 23:13, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I was not the one who reverted the edit. I think you should talk to the person who did about it. LeonChrisfield (talk) 23:17, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: yes, my bad! i was not meaning to challenge anyone per se, I was just curious what people thought but lazily only tagged one person :) Remsense聊 23:19, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

text: But yes, the word “exiled” is usually used for governments that lost all territories and are on the loose under foreign protections. LeonChrisfield (talk) 23:18, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'exiled' etc. nomenclature
Talk:COBOL

message: After reviewing this article, I am concerned that it no longer meets the GA criteria. My concerns are listed below:
*The lede is several paragraphs long with lots of information added since it passed GAN in 2015. Can this be formatted to better conform to WP:LEDE?
*The "COBOL 60" section is quite bloated: while it was large when it passed GAN in 2015, it seems to have gotten larger since then and contains many short paragraphs. Is anyone interested in reducing and/or removing information?
*There is some uncited information. 
Anyone interested in fixing up this article? If not it might be nominated to WP:GAR. Pinging the GAN nominator . Z1720 (talk) 01:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA concerns
Talk:Celts

message: The Celts. Cain-Kain-qayin Dissendance (Theory)
Eve and adam sons:
The names Cain and Abel are Latin/English transliterations of the Greek names as found in the Septuagint (2,000 year old Greek translation of the Hebrew). In Greek, Cain is Καιν (Kain) and Abel is Αβελ (Abel). These are in turn Greek transliterations of the Hebrew. In Hebrew Cain is קין (qayin) and Abel is חבל (havel) 2603:8001:AD00:8EFC:5D75:86BC:F26D:881C (talk) 08:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: - You have not described what edit you would like to be made, nor provided any reliable secondary sources for any such claim. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:51, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 January 2024 

message: "The Balts ARE", "The Slavs ARE" but "The Celts were"? Every other European ethno-linguistic group has a single article discussing them as a modern people but the Celts have two, one which speaks of us in the past tense and another which also quotes racists who deny our very existence. 84.203.151.5 (talk) 03:10, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This article does not discuss them as a modern people. The existence of a current Celtic ethno-linguistic group, or at least a monolithic one, is very questionable. Most scholars are reluctant to accept it. I think you'll find many other nations have similar divisions - Germany, Italy, Belgium etc etc. Johnbod (talk) 04:17, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  THE CELTS ARE. 

message: M269 spread in Late Neolithic, this should be indicated in the map caption. --95.24.68.172 (talk) 04:56, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  M269
Talk:Cosmological argument

message: Could they do with their own section? They are commonly used as an objection to cosmological arguments from what I've read. I'm talking about things like his assertion that a posteriori reasoning alone allows us to deduce cause and effect relationships, and that an effect can be conceived to exist in the mind without a cause.--Phil of rel (talk) 12:23, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hume's counter-arguments 

message: I'd like to propose to move this page to 'Cosmological arguments' since it deals with multiple comsological arguments. The literature I've looked at makes a distinction between cosmological arguments that use things like causal finitism vs the principle of sufficient reason. Wouldn't it be more academic (and more consistent with wikipedia's style) to label this page 'Cosmological arguments'?--Phil of rel (talk) 17:38, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Your reasoning makes sense, but I just had a look: both the Encyclopedia Britannica and the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy call their article "Cosmological argument". The reason may be that, according to the Stanford article, "The cosmological argument is less a particular argument than an argument type". Phlsph7 (talk) 17:46, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, I had forgotten that there are common features underlying all cosmological arguments. I suppose that it would be technically incorrect and probably inconsistent with Wiki policy to rename the page. I withdraw the proposal.--Phil of rel (talk) 17:54, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed page move: 'Cosmological argument' to 'Cosmological arguments' 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Uncaused causer and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at  until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 18:43, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Uncaused causer" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:C (programming language)

message: In the "overview" section, under "User-defined (typedef) and compound types are possible" Unions are mentioned as "Union is a structure with overlapping members; only the last member stored is valid."
This is not a fair or accurate statement according to the C standard. I believe this may have been written confusing the C standard for the C++ one, in which accessing a union member that was not most recently written to is strictly undefined.
The C standard explicitly allows "type-punning" using unions, but carefully promises that reinterpreting the bit-representation of one type to another may result in an invalid or trap representation.
The following is pulled directly from the C17 standard. It lies in a footnote under section 6.5.2.3.3:
"If the member used to read the contents of a union object is not the same as the member last used to store a value in the object, the appropriate part of the object representation of the value is reinterpreted as an object representation in the new type as described in 6.2.6 (a process sometimes called “type punning”). This might be a trap representation."
The mention of unions should probably be edited to something like "Union is a structure with overlapping members; it allows multiple data types to share the same memory location".
I will leave this note here for a few weeks and if no one objects I will make the edit. WillisHershey (talk) 21:28, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Only the last member stored is valid" 

message: There appears to be two similar sections in the main article: Relations to other languages and Related languages.  Former is a list within the Overview section; latter is an exposition on the influence of C, sitting near the end of the article.
Should we consider these as duplicates, and merge them to one location?  Or are we happy with the different emphasis on the somewhat similar content, and leave well alone?  Or Perhaps replace the first section with a sentence and keep the latter section?  Or something else? Chumpih t 05:29, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate sections on related languages - merge?
Talk:Chocolate

message: The very start of the text where it says the cacao seeds have an intense bitter taste seems wrong. Cacao seeds, straight out the pod, are actually mild and slightly sweet. The fermentation isn’t to remove a bitter taste, it’s simply to make it taste more interesting and complex 81.111.248.185 (talk) 22:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cacao seed taste
Talk:Cthulhu Mythos

message: To anyone who may be interested, this content was originally intended to be used with tables included in the articles Cthulhu Mythos deities, Elements of the Cthulhu Mythos, Books in the Cthulhu Mythos, Characters of the Cthulhu Mythos, and Extraterrestrial places in the Cthulhu Mythos. -- œ™ 18:38, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:OlEnglish/Cthulhu Mythos reference codes and bibliography|Cthulhu Mythos reference codes and bibliography]] 

message: I'm looking for participants for a possible new wikiproject H. P. Lovecraft, to tag and improve articles relating to the horror writer. Ftaghn!--Auric talk 09:59, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Now recruiting 

message: I'm pretty sure the Cthulhu Mythos contains more than just deities. Like the Mi-Go, the Yithians, etc.
:Please have a look at the See also section, :Template:Cthulhu Mythos and especially Elements of the Cthulhu Mythos#Non-human species - there you will find the other stuff. What to name how and where to put what is a currently unsolved problem, see the notice just above. Daranios (talk) 16:20, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @Daranios It is, which is why I proposed a merge below you may want to comment on. Also ping User:CapnZapp and User:Auric. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:58, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the other stuff?
Talk:Color temperature

message: The applications list in the lead is currently
: lighting, photography, videography, publishing, manufacturing, astrophysics and other fields
I dropped horticulture, because it's really an abuse of the concept--color temperature is specifically with respect to the human eye, and photosynethesis has a different spectral response.  
I have my doubts about the manufacturing and astrophysics items in the list.  Certainly, a manufacturing plant needs lighting, but so do lots of other spaces and they all fall under lighting.  And if you are manufacturing something that is supposed to be a particular color, you need to make sure you look at it under a specified light source(s), but color temperature isn't an adequate spec for that.
[Incorrect comments about astrophysics deleted; see new comment below]
For the rest, of the applications, it would be cool to link to where color temperature is discussed in articles about each.  But that could be a project for another day. Ccrrccrr (talk) 23:22, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: My initial comment on astrophysics was ill informed.  What I should have said is that the parameter defined as color temperature in astrophysics is a little different from the definition generally discussed in this article.  I will edit it to make that clearer in the lead when I get a chance. Ccrrccrr (talk) 10:24, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

text: @Beeblebrox Absolutely, the quality of the light that you provide them is important for lots of reasons.  The light spectrum is important in ways that are not captured by the single number color temperature.  when you discuss something being graphed, it sounds like you are talking about the spectrum, not the color temperature. Ccrrccrr (talk) 05:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

text: I think the most productive approach to this would be to remember that wikipedia standards state that the lede should summarise the main article. For any application to be mentioned in the lede, it should contain cited text in main article. This is the best and clearest way to decide what applications should appear in this list. So, we need to set about finding sources for all these applications. WP:OR and WP:RS are fundamental principles of wikipedia. Ashmoo (talk) 13:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Applications 

message: This article contains some useful information, but sadly contains a large amount of text that has had "citation needed" tags for 11 years. We really need find sources for this text or remove the text from the article (no matter how reasonable or accurate it seems). Ashmoo (talk) 13:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Long term lack of sources
Talk:London Borough of Croydon/Archive 1

message: Sorry, Morwen, Brent is in north London, I am afraid not a neighbour of Croydon in south-east London, but Bromley and Epsom are. Hope you don't my changing it. :-) Dieter Simon 00:07, 26 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Brent

message: There is no need for the stub Croydon, as there is this much better article London Borough of London. All new items should go into this. The parts of Croydon are already here in Borough article. If the hairstyle item is substantiated (I have never heard of it though I am an old Croydonian) then it should also go into the larger article. The stub is much better off as a redirect. Dieter Simon 01:34, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub ''Croydon''

message: Although a Croydonian myself and of course I would like to see trade thrive in the town, I agree with the revert as a link to a website that promotes shopping does not belong into Wikipedia, not into any encyclopaedia actually. Dieter Simon 01:21, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Shopping in Croydon

message: I never got a fix on the location of the old Ann Summers headquarters but I believe it was behind the Rose and Crown in Whyteleafe. If so, it is marginal as to which district it was in - the Croydon / Tandridge border runs right through that area. However now that she has moved to a splendid new building by the Wopses Lodge Roundabout, she is definitely in Tandridge and therefore don't qualify for mention here. -- 80.189.55.167 02:20, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ann Summers
Talk:Chick Publications

message: Hi everyone,
I have created a navbox, , with the purpose of holding pages related to Chick Publications.
There used to be a category for this. See Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 February 19#Category:Chick Publications.
--Kevinkor2 (talk) 11:36, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  new navbox 

message: One of the links added to the page (Footnote #63) now leads to a porn site - the link hasn't been changed but for some reason it now redirects to the improper page. I have left the URL up, just removed the hotlink; perhaps someone more familiar with the original source can update the URL. 68.146.64.9 (talk) 22:21, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried using Internet Archive but it kept timing out.  I removed the URL altogether and replaced it with the the actual name of the original site.  I will keep trying to see if I can get a Internet Archive reference we can use but it generally doesn't have much luck with picture heavy sites.--BruceGrubb (talk) 18:25, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Porn link removed
Talk:Comet Hale–Bopp

message: Without any RM revisit, maybe there should be a brief blurb in the article that the IAU refers to the comet as Hale-Bopp ... ?  That might put some of the concerns to bed without renaming the article/changing MOS. 50.111.24.158 (talk) 14:45, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  hyphen versus long-dash 

message: This would make a logical next section! Grassynoel (talk) 09:53, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it would be way off topic for this article as it would have nothing to do with Hale-Bopp. -- Kheider (talk) 16:21, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The next Great Comets
Talk:Rhyming slang

message: Anybody willing to find a source that mentions "blow a raspberry"'s use in the United States?  That statement comes from an American.  BlueCaper (talk), 18 December 2012 (UTC) 02:08
:Anybody willing to find a source that mentions the use of dog, bucket, broomstick, umbrella-stand and hootenanny in American usage? No?! Maybe because they speak English in America, like everyone else in the Anglophone world!
:Nuttyskin (talk) 17:16, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Raspberry" used in the US
Talk:Christianity and homosexuality

message: I haven't gone through all the previous chat, so it might have been covered, but at least the implication of saying the Cathoilc Church views all sexual acts not related to procreation as sinful is a little amiss?
https://www.catholic.com/qa/intent-to-conceive-not-necessary Beyondheat (talk) 16:30, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catholic view on sinful sexual acts 

message: Is this real enough to be added to wikipedia? 91.240.227.220 (talk) 15:21, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: A very simple check of older translations finds this claim to be a lie. For example, the 1901 ASV translation says "Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind." Similarly in the 1917 Jewish Publication Society's translation, the 1611 King James Version, Moffat's 1935 translation, Joseph Smith's corrected translation, Lamsa's 1961 translation based on Aramaic, etc., etc. Pete unseth (talk) 16:03, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lev. 18:22
Talk:Common preference

message: This article was listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion Apr 20 to Apr 26 2004.  Consensus was not reached.  Turned into a disambig page at discretion of admin.  Discussion:
From Cleanup: Common preference, legitimate?
*Delete.  The term as it's defined in the article would be meaningful but not useful, since there's no particular reason why such a preference should exist in a randomly chosen situation.  I've never heard anyone use it. My guess is that it's a term only used by the Taking Children Seriously movement.  The real question would then become whether TCS warrants an article about themselves and a separate article about one of their concepts.  Isomorphic 02:43, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD
Talk:Computer science

message: In the field sections, Artificial Intelligence is on 4.3, above Applied Computer Science (4.4). Should we swap their positions?
The numerical category might be just arbitrary, but I feel like Applied Computer Science should be right next to Theoretical Computer Science down, and Computer Systems could be dropped down too. So there's like a sense or prioritization.
Artificial Intelligence seems to be a more recently development in computer science, so it could be the last on the list. Ejenriquez (talk) 01:32, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: . I also moved  into , because it seemed weird as the only top-level area. Freoh (talk) 01:44, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we prioritize (move up) Applied Computer Science from Artificial Intelligence? 

message: , if you have any questions about your proposed changes or would like to discuss further to gain consensus, please post here.
If I understand your concern correctly, you may be mixing up automaton with automation. From citation 3:
"The discipline of computing is the systematic study of algorithmic processes that describe and transform information, their theory, analysis, design, efficiency, implementation, and application. The fundamental question underlying all of computing is, 'What can be (efficiently) automated?'"
Best,
Caleb Stanford (talk) 23:17, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverts 

message: Hamoodyshal1 (talk) 15:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. —Bagumba (talk) 16:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 April 2024 (2)