lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sniffles (Merrie Melodies)

message: I removed:
:His most notable characteristic is his incessant talking, which never seems to waver, slow down, give anyone else a chance to talk, use any form of punctuation, or even stay on-topic for more than a few seconds.
This is discussed in the article already. The character was not always a chatterbox, but Jones changed him into one later in the series. — BrianSmithson 20:37, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chattberbox

message: Does the characterization of Sniffles remind anyone else of Fievel from the American Tail series, with similar clothing, personality, etc.?
WAVY 10 16:56, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In that they're both mouse children drawn in the cute Disney style, yes. — BrianSmithson 22:19, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Tail? 

message: I am finding a lot of conflicting information on who exactly was the VA for Sniffles. IMDB for the most part lists Margaret Hill-Talbot as his voice actor. Bernice Hansen was credited a lot as his VA for years, but some say that is incorrect, and Hansen only had two roles in WB cartoons - Little Kitty in I Haven't Got a Hat and Tommy Cat in The Night Watchman. Tommy Cat's voice and Sniffles voice are INCREDIBLY similar, and I think Hansen may have been a pseudonym for Talbot. Gay Seabrook's wiki page credits her as the voice actor for Sniffles along with two people named Marjorie Tarlton and Leone Ledoux. This poster says Sara Berner also did Sniffles voice after Seabrook. I am totally confused on who the true VA was. yonnie (talk) 17:40, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Voice actor(s)
Talk:Dragonskin Body Armor

message: I keep hearing things about this body armor, including the accusation in the Daily Kos link (that it's used by secret service but has not been issued to deployed soldiers, and been banned to them). limited time and resources drop the obvious links on the page, anyone want to put something real here (ie; there is context, can we get content)Darker Dreams 20:38, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't worry about it.  Your observation is accurate, but there's no need to delete the article when  redirects are so cheap.  This article now redirects to Dragon Skin body armor.  Mangojuicetalk 03:43, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Adams

message: User GODDESSY is via her own admittance the person of who this Wikipedia article is about (Stephanie Adams).
User Goddessy has been blocked and banned by several moderators and administrators.
User Goddessy has made several severe Personal Attacks and been warned and kept attacking.
No credible RELIABLE verifiable information on this Wikipedia article except that Stephanie Adams was in a fact a Playboy model. No reliable verifiable evidence at all about love life, partners and or business. While Stephanie Adams may be notable only for appearing in Playboy, her business, her lovers are certainly not notable.
The User GODDESSY was BANNED 
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:GODDESSY
and continued to make the Wikipedia article via a sockpuppet IP
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=68.161.222.151
User GODDESSY continues to harrass and make libelous and Personal comments about users who edit the page with verifiable facts.
Previous Deletion Requests:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/GODDESSY
I vote Delete per Vanity and Wikipedia Rules and Standards WP:BIO and WP:VAIN and WP:WEB
Please read the Talk Page to see how GODDESSY handles people who edit "her private Wikipedia article" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Stephanie_Adams
Read it all it's a good chuckle.
JuliannaRoseMauriello 20:25, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment this is the wrong forum for this complaint. It should be removed and taken to the appropriate venue - probably the administrators noticeboard. Gwernol 20:35, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved from AfD page
Talk:Sequence of Saint Eulalia

message: I have removed the transposition of the text into "hypothetical post-imperial Vulgar Latin", first added in December 2010. This, and subsequent edits, were OR. The same action was taken for similarly unsourced content in Oaths of Strasbourg in April 2007. I have added an English translation directly quoted from two different sources (hoping in this way to avoid both NOR and COPYVIO problems). Notable remarks about the VL sources of individual words or structures in the Sequence can be added in the Analysis section, but only if they are taken from reliable, cited sources. CapnPrep (talk) 17:45, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Vulgar Latin 

message: I removed four external links from Eulalia of Barcelona, as they are about the Sequence and the predecessor work by Prudentius (both covered in this article), not about Eulalia of Barcelona herself. They don't seem to be present in this article. I'll list them here in case any editors feel they should be added here:
:*Hymn to St. Eulalia in Prudentius, Peristephanon, Carmen III
:**Translation of the Prudentius hymn, by Robert J. Baker
:*La Cantilène de Sainte Eulalie
:*Translation of the Cantilène by Richard Stracke
TJRC (talk) 16:38, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links removed from Eulalia of Barcelona; may be appropriate here
Talk:Eulalia of Barcelona

message: In the article it says "A dove flew from her neck when she was decapitated" - in among an actual biography, it's presented as fact. There's no citation, or explanation as to how. I'm assuming it's a symbolic part of the religious retelling of her story? Otherwise it's quite remarkable, but, it seems strange as it is.--2.223.133.19 (talk) 12:01, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Synaxarium

message: Since they are of (at least) two kinds, i'd probably split them, with a Dab page -- if the existing article made clear enuf to me what those kinds are.--Jerzy•t 21:03, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, that should happen and the names should reflect the page they're actually at. Currently the lead sentence uses Greek forms where they should start with the Latin. — LlywelynII 07:33, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation? 

message: * Much of this article is taken from the Catholic Encyclopedia article, which IMHO is not well written: there are unclear referents, & the citation that currently reads "Nilles, op. cit., infra, I, xlix" is an exact copy of the CE article, which has no previous citation to Nikolaus Nilles' work. (Based on the Wikipedia article, I think it refers to his Kalendarium manuale utriusque Ecclesiae orientalis et occidentalis, 2nd ed. (Innsbruck, 1896). But I don't have access to that work, so I'm not going to make the edit.)
* This article mentions a text called "Menaia" -- is this the same as Menaion? From the context I think so, but I'm reluctant to link that word to that article without better knowledge of this subject. (Which is why I came to this article in the first place.) -- llywrch (talk) 18:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two comments
Talk:Theban Legion

message: Why is the image of the Legion wrong? - St-Maurice was a black man, he was not a white person, that is simply historical fact with the early depictions and sculptures.
I would think that at least a picture inside of the article depicting the actual race of the leader would be appropriate.Orasis 20:12, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The iconic tradition depicting Maurice as a Moor was strongest in Germany and Bohemia from the thirteenth century, dying out in the mid-sixteenth. I've added some referenced detail at Saint Maurice. "Historical fact" is not a serious issue with Maurice, much less "historical" ethnicity. --Wetman (talk) 00:58, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: At Saint-Maurice, Switzerland, then called Agaunum, the orders were given— since the Legion had refused to worship a man, to sacrifice to the Emperor— to "decimate" it by putting to death a tenth of its men.[clarification needed] This act was repeated until none were left.
I don't understand this sentence description in the text. Please help clarify it. I am assuming that since this is in the 5th century and Rome is Christian that the troops are Christian. Why would Roman officers command troops to sacrifice a man to the emperor? Unless, of course, Christianity is not fully adopted and this is old Roman custom intertwined with new Christian custom. However, that is not what is described and it would be wildly presumptuous of me to assume that this is what happened. Is there any historical clarification of this event? Please help clarify the confusion of why 6,000+ Roman soldiers would be put to death. Thanks. Stevenmitchell (talk) 08:52, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: They were not told to sacrifice a man to the Emperor, they were told to offer sacrifice (probably incense) to the Emperor.  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 13:55, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification needed

message: This page says Sept. 22 but the page October_10_(Eastern_Orthodox_liturgics) has them listed at Oct. 10.  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 13:57, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The September date is for the Catholic Church. natemup (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  date of feast
Talk:Vladimir Antonov-Ovseenko

message: The Tambov Rebellion page says he was killed resisting arrest. This page says he was arrested in 1938 and executed the same year.
You are taliking about a different person Alexander Antonov , Antonov is a common Russian lastname. Fisenko 22:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: If he joined the Menshevik party in 1903, how could be have "became a Menshevik in protest at the conflict" in 1914?125.237.105.102 (talk) 00:15, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Menshevik 

message: The oªcial founding of the POUM took place in Barcelona on September 29. With a membership of six thousand at the very most, the new revolutionary party was oªcially structured on the basis of Leninist democratic centralism and formally accepted Maurín’s doctrine of the democratic-socialist revolution. There is little doubt that it was internally more democratic than the PCE. Though the POUM contained a significant small core of intellectuals and theorists, it was made up primarily of blue-collar and service workers, most of whom spoke Catalan as their native language. In a generous gesture toward the former ICE, the POUM gave its leaders twelve of the forty-one seats on the new central committee, a substantial overrepresentation. In his new book Maurín declared that the Comintern had failed as a center 74 from revolutionary insurrection to popular front of world revolution and functioned merely as “an instrument in the service of the Soviet state,” which was of course true. Though the POUM rejected “Trotskyism,” it would remain friendly to Trotsky—the BOC had called the constant and ferocious Soviet attacks on Trotsky an “incitement to assassination” (which proved to be exactly the case)—and occasionally publish his articles.
* 
Interesting story, isnt it? Cinadon36 (talk) 15:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I dont have any interest in to this. So please don't ping me. Write whatever you choose. Not important.Αντικαθεστωτικός (talk) 15:56, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I pinged you because of this. It's ok, I wont ping again. Cinadon36 (talk) 16:41, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was POUM a Trotskyist party? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. No objections in nearly two months.   Mdewman6 (talk) 22:02, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 July 2021
Talk:421

message: The "(LDS) Destruction of Nephites by Lamanites" entry was moved to 385.  Although Moroni was a Nephite and was still alive around 421 when he buried the Golden Plates, the main destruction of the Nephites by the Lamanites took place during the final battle at Cumorah in 385 A.D.  After that battle, all of the Nephites save Moroni were either hunted down and killed or absorbed into the Lamanites' culture, so essentially there was no Nephite nation after 385. Matatigre36 21:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Correction (LDS event history)
Talk:Assembly of the Republic (Northern Cyprus)

message: How can the number of votes for the top political party be more than a million when the population of the whole country is less than a million?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8806:2200:1A0:F437:6940:A71D:34EC (talk) 19:32, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Lambert Cadwalader (representative)

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 17:59, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: I've removed the Encyclopedia of Pennsylvania Biography: Illustrated, Volume 3 as a source because it only mentions Lambert very briefly, according to an online search of its contents . I'm wondering how much of this article might be original genealogical research. Sionk (talk) 01:48, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of sources
Talk:Satisfaction theory of atonement

message: There is an odd few lines linked to Sproul's website.
"We should shrink in horror from the idea that God actually died on the cross. The atonement was..."
Not sure what this has to do with an outline of Anselm's theology, seems to belong to a general discussion of the topic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.150.178.217 (talk) 11:00, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Anselm is not Sproul

message: This article does not seem to realize the difference.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.242.18.53 (talk) 18:33, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Satisfaction vs. Substitution

message: This article has been tagged with needing citation. Could whomever tagged it please be a bit more specific as to where citations are needed? It's a very long article with lots of citations Sharktacos 19:02, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't place the tag, but in general every section should have at least one, generally two, reference citations, particularly if specific facts are mentioned. Having said that, I think Atonement#Development of the doctrine and Atonement#Further developments are likely the sections thought of as requiring citations. Hope that helps a little. John Carter 17:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: It's not all that clear, but some of the more modern theologians might have deemed some of the doctrines on atonement to be a tad anti-semitic, since there is a strong emphasis on sacrifice and expiation, a vocabulary that eventually found its way into the language of anti-semites, who demanded retribution for the alleged crimes of the Jews. ADM (talk) 13:49, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that that is far from clear (or a necessary/natural consequence). Sounds more like guilt by association than a genuine connection to me. --Flex (talk/contribs) 01:48, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  That's ridiculous... that would be like saying that you made an anti-semetic statement just now because your statmenet had "sacrifice" and "expiation" in the sentence. Oh no... I just did it too. ReformedArsenal (talk) 23:50, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Anti-semitism
Talk:Cycle index

message: The cycle index is a property of a permutation group, not of a group.  The permutation group article rightly draws a distinction between these notions; it points out that two groups G and H can be isomorphic as groups without being isomorphic as permutation groups.  For example, consider the group G generated by the single permutation (1 2 3 4 5 6), and the group H generated by the permutations (1 2) and (3 4 5).  G and H are isomorphic as groups—they are both isomorphic to C6—but they are different permutation groups, and they have different cycle indices. But this article glosses over or ignores this important point in many places.
For example, the article says "The cyclic group C6 contains the six permutations … and its cycle index is …". We can think of G and H of the previous paragraph as corresponding to different homomorphisms from  C6 to S6.  Here the "G" embedding of C6  has been chosen, and the "H" embedding ignored, but the article could just have easily have gone the other way.  Is it correct to speak of "The cyclic group C6" in this case?  Don't algebraists have some more precise terminology that they would use here?  Would they talk explicitly about the homomorphisms?
I do not have enough expertise or command of the technical terminology to repair this myself, so I am going to tag this article as needing attention from an expert. —Mark Dominus (talk) 16:27, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Tweaked two spots that I thought strayed furthest from the permutation group assumption. Rschwieb (talk) 13:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Groups vs. permutation groups
Talk:Cosmological natural selection

message: I have tried to find any paper published in a peer-reviewed journal about this topic and have found none. Can anyone refer one to me.
Another thing.
We live in a universe where a star needs only a mass of 1.5 to 2.5 times the mass of our sun to collapse into a black hole. What Lee Smolin proposes is that a universe which produces more black holes than any other would in fact possess the laws of physics our universe does. He argues that cosmological natural selection is superior to the anthropic principle because it is falsifiable. That is, if we discover anything in our universe suggesting our universe is not ideal for producing black holes, the theory is disproven. A theory must be falsifiable or it is not scientific, because observation holds no power over it.
I suppose Lee Smolin is a physicist, and for this reason I doubt that he has proposed this as is. While models predict a 1.5-2.5 times, it is false to assume that a star 1.5 to 2.5 times the size of our Sun will become a black hole. This does not take in account of what will be left of the mass of a star after it has consumed it's hydrogen and the second phases start when it start burning whatit has produced and so on, and after it start expending and dissolving its masses (which stars at that size will eventualy do). So, in short, I doubt and I doubt Smolin actually says as a physicist that stars of that size could actually form a black hole.
Also, considering that most stars are in the average range of stars only slightly more massive than our Sun, had the universe been selected through natural selection, from fitness, we would expect more bigger stars than what you do presently observe, so that they can end up to be black holes. It is either this or that the universe has more advantages forming smaller ones so to make more environments possible where intelligent being could evolve and later after the universe start dying out and that its low density doesn't permit the formation of stars anymore, for the survival of those intelligent being they start forming stars themselves and that many of those start becoming black hole, so that for the universe it would be more advantagious to have little stars so that it permit life that will in their turn build stars and black holes. Which is plausible and very interesting. Is there any papers published about this, is this hypotheses even notable at all? Fad (ix) 21:18, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is there any paper published?

message: Why on earth are there two separate pages on this, each referring to the other? Obvious case for merger, surely! PaddyLeahy 21:49, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Scott Speed

message: Is Speed his real last name or did he change it to Speed? DarkSideOfTheSpoon 10:30, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name? 

message: Regarding this statement:
"Scott's outburst after this punishment led ITV commentator Martin Brundle to remark that he was "not an easy person to like", ITV main commentator Jackie Stewart then commented "Same can be said about you Martin'"
I remember Brundle making that statement DURING the Australian GP, but when did he make the same statement with Jackie Stewart in the picture?
:Stewart's not an ITV commentator, although he may have been interviewed at that race. 4u1e 19:29, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Brundle Statement
Talk:Destrudo

message: That actual Hellenic meaning of the word weiner had nothing to do with "erotic love."  It had to do with Metis and Logos.  There were no sexual connotations to that concept at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.3.112.170 (talk • contribs) 
:Could you find me a reference? If you can, I'll fix it. Or you cn do it if you like. This information would likely improve the value of the article greatly. --DanielCD 22:08, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Can someone who knows what this is referring to try to make some sense of it for those that are unfamilar with the concept?  I got here from death instinct which the article makes clear is the work of Freud, but this stub basically states destrudo almost as absolute fact rather than attributing the theory (which I'm assuming it is) to individuals or groups, despite using very non-scientific terms such as "life force".  I'd like to know a little more about the history of destrudo and who is responsible for it and whatnot. - 81.178.65.251 21:09, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone and Context

message: No one can shed moe light on this topic because "unfortunately the original article was written in a rather obscure German," and is therefore impervious to translation. -24.4.26.116 (talk) 19:51, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone and Context

message: Is this the same thing?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortido  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kommunowledge (talk • contribs) 19:02, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this article should be merged with Destrudo. RockBass83 (talk) 04:14, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  IMHO, both of these articles should probably be merged into Death drive. They seem to all be discussing the same thing.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:52, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed, all three articles should be merged into one.  RockBass83 (talk) 22:38, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the consensus here, formally made the proposal over on Death drive to ensure that opinions from there are considered. Klbrain (talk) 12:33, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 20:01, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Proposal: Mortido 
Talk:Bowmore

message: Correct usage is "a RAF" not "an RAF" - see RAF website jmb 21:25, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar

message: This user has made several additions to the page, which are quite funny, but which should probably be deleted. They are not NPOV, and some are obviously untrue - for example "Iain Brown . . . is often compared to to the likes of Alex Ferguson and Bob Paisley", and for example "flying low over the main street . . . as this is the only way to get down the street safely . . . "
If no-one objects, I will revert all of this user's edits to this article. GeraldH 08:56, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to delete user 84.43.104.66's edits

message: Can someone who knows more about it than I do add the correct pronunciation of "Bowmore" to the page, please?  gothick (talk) 21:35, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation? 
Talk:Atlantic Giant Squid

message: I am the creator of the article. Seeing as how I am new, (please don't bite the newcomers) I could use a great deal of help. If you wish to make any helpful edits to this article, please do so. Ben 21:27, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: First, don't use fictitious information. The squid and the Sperm Whale rarely come in contact with each other, and the squid is not the aggressor when they do. Look at the information on giant squid to glean information specific to this species. Otherwise, a nice start. Welcome! - UtherSRG (talk) 13:14, 17 May 2006 (UTC)