lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Panhard

message: Dear Authors,
I think the statement "From 1925 the motors didn't have valves" is incorrect.
As far as I know, from 1925 all models had sleeve valve engines instead.
Regards, --80.98.146.251 12:41, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Panhard&diff=18357809&oldid=18345415
I can't see why this change was made.
The energy crisis was clearly a failure in planning, mostly by the US government and perhaps also by oil investors.  If policies in the 50s and 60s had been more realistic, Panhard might have survived or even greatly expanded.
--David R. Ingham 22:36, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The original text blamed the energy crisis on the failure of Panhard.  I felt that this causality was flawed - that ignorant of energy policies led to both the demise of Panhard and the energy crisis.  Shall we discuss?  --SFoskett 19:44, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
What I meant was that the failure of Panhard is an example of how the energy policies (and un-informed investments?) let to the energy crisis.  Maybe I was not clear.--David R. Ingham 15:43, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marketing failure? 

message: "The last Panhard car was built in 1967." and yet there's a picture of the "VBL" which was "developed during the 80s and entered operational service in France in 1990" and there are "1100 in use in France".
So which is it?
:I think that means that Panhard quit the civilian car business in 1967 and since then has made only military vehicles. The VBL is the Véhicule Blindé Léger -- "Light armoured vehicle".--GagHalfrunt 19:30, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Dead Yet? 

message: In late october 2012 Swedish truck company Volvo bought Panhard for 538 million SEK. 
Note, Volvo (truck company) is not the sam as Volvo PV (cars) that is owned by Geely.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.182.222.40 (talk) 08:57, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panhard bought by Swedish Volvo
Talk:List of Lone Wolf (gamebooks)

message: Regarding the name "List of Lone Wolf (gamebooks)", shouldn't this article have a name more along the lines of "List of Lone Wolf game books", "List of Lone Wolf gamebooks", or "List of Lone Wolf books"?  The disambiguation for "Lone Wolf" isn't needed when explicitly listing out the books, since it's clear in such a context that we're talking about novels. -- Slordak 15:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Talk:Rail transport operations

message: Trains are composed in a classification yard. These large, uninviting structures are excellent locations for train spotting and graffiti sighting. Switcher or shunter locomotives help the composing.
What a strange amalgam of AmE, BrE, POV statements, and English-as-a-foreign-language! -- Picapica 18:24, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Composition 

message: Moved the following from article space to here. Unsourced and had sig, prob meant to be here anyhow:
::The correct terminology for the system in Britain is Absolute block and track circuit block  Michaelduly 20:00, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above states that this is unsourced. I am a railway signaller fully qualified and signalling trains in the UK. I work for Network Rail. As previosly stated the correct terminology for signalling in the UK is absolute block and track circuit block. References can be found here: http://www.signalbox.org Michaelduly 13:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolute block and track circuit block are just two of many different 'methods of working' used on UK railways. Other examples are electric token block, tokenless block, one train working and radio electronic token block. –Signalhead < T > 19:52, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement moved from article 

message: This section makes no sense and the list does not weigh different sub types appropriately. I am replacing it with a more descriptive paragraph.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wickifrank (talk • contribs) 17:42, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Types of rail system 

message: I think there could be something on 'Differences between passenger and freight operations' and how these can be managed together but I'm not an expert. At least there should be something about different speed requirements and weight restrictions. As such, I can't make out f.e. can a Class II railroad host a passenger train going 60mph. Class 3 I guess doesn't, though it endures lighter passenger trains AOK. 85.77.118.87 (talk) 08:32, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: From an international point of view, things are quite different outwith the USA, as there appear to be fewer restrictions on light multiple units operating on the same tracks as freight trains. Tim PF (talk) 20:53, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New section or article? 
Talk:Super Series '76

message: This has a Soviet POV, however I, a Flyers fan, do not find it objectionably biased.  Perhaps I'll come back and describe the events in Phila. to balance it out.  See if I can be as neutral.--J Clear 16:46, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is an article about the USSR tour, so it is highlighting the soviet teams, however I did my best to remove most of the "so-and-so doubled so-and-so" type NPOV while cleaning up the article as a whole somewhat. --ZsinjTalk 22:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I could say that this is about a series of hockey games in North America, in front of North American fans, but what it was was an international hockey summit, with a touch of cold war thrown in.  It just deserves as neutral a POV as possible.  The present article is good, except for "dumped" (well there are were a few typos...).  Unless that was a shut out or shellacking, then I'd say something factual like shut out or wide margin.  PersonallyI think the article could use a section on the political tensions involved with both points of view, but those are hard to keep balanced, so maybe not.--J Clear 03:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I took a look (from an American hockey fan's perspective) and I think it's NPOV now. Somebody agree with me and remove the tag, ok? -- Butseriouslyfolks 08:31, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it has a reasonable slant, and should be maintained as a seperate article from the generic Super Series. Also, I created an article which describes in detail the Flyers versus Red Army game. -- 10stone5 10:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: This article isn't going anywhere, maybe should merge it into Super Series?  Thoughts? Kevlar67 03:31, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: It should be noted that the Soviet teams that came over for this series were not the actual club teams they were purported to be. Both teams in this series borrowed players from other Soviet teams to be more competetive--the Wings had an entire line from the national team, as I recall, and the Red Army also had a couple of "guest" players. That skewed the results somewhat and this point should be mentioned in the articel somewhere. It still was a great series. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 134.243.211.185 (talk) 13:57, June 27, 2007
:Hmmm...do you have any references for this? BsroiaadnTalk 16:21, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing Team Info

message: Unfortunately, as detailed as that page looks, there seems to be missing a key ingredient: WHERE were played each of those games. Don't you think it's important?!... --AlainR345Techno-Wiki-Geek 15:12, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location, location, location!
Talk:Wallis and Futuna national football team

message: Kit updated according to  and . └ OzLawyer / talk ┐ 18:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kit colours 

message: Shoudn't this be moved to the Wallis and Futuna regional football team since its a region and not a country?--Cokepepsi 00:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 

message: There could (should) be something about them not playing a match since 1995 (in 14 years)!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.141.125.19 (talk) 07:36, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled thread of 14 September 2009 

message: As someone already said, there should be something about their non-activity. And, other thing, infobox lists a 0-13 to Tahiti as their biggest defeat. However, in Solomon Islands national football team there is a 0-17 loss to Solomon Islands. 82.141.66.217 (talk) 21:58, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The 0–17 loss to the Solomon Islands is supported by RSSSF, and I have changed it in the infobox. Regarding the team's inactivity, I couldn't find a reliable source which explicitly documented that they have not played in 15 years. Are any available online? Thanks, -- Black Falcon (talk) 21:13, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There isn't an online source supporting this.  However, it is a fact.  Their only games have been in the South Pacific Games, and they have not entered this tournament since 1995. The 17-0 loss is no longer supported by RSSSF.  It is only mentioned in parentheses as an alternative score (5-0 is given as the main score).  It seems incredible that a score could be written as "5-0 or 17-0", but that is the situation.  I've spoken with RSSSF and others involved with the page, and indeed there are 2 separate sources giving wildly different scores.  Clearly, the 5-0 source appears more credible, and this is why RSSSF have put the 17-0 score in parentheses.  With regard to the relative strengths of the teams at that time, the 5-0 score seems eminently more plausible. http://rsssf.com/tabless/southpac91.html Mcruic (talk) 03:21, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No match since 1995 and biggest defeat 
Talk:Carol Hathaway

message: editors have put in a lot of work in clearly an have amassed a lot of detail.if this page should be deemed to fail Wikipedia's notability test, a new home should be found for thus detailed content. Suggestions? Comments on notability? Notability-related improvement feasibility?CecilWard (talk) 18:08, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability - new home
Talk:Masticophis flagellum

message: Is there any source for the claim that they can slither 15 mph. This seems incorrect. The black mamba which is widely regarded as the fastest snake can only move at half that speed. That bit should probably be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.47.64.47 (talk) 03:52, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Behavior 

message: I encountered a red coachwhip on the Imperial Highway (San Diego County road S2) south of Agua Calliente Springs on 7/4/2006. The snake was in the road holding its head up when I saw it ahead of me. I had to move to the oncoming lane to avoid the snake. I made a U-turn to take another look. I assumed that the snake had been hit by a car but there was no sign of injury (its head was on the ground when I returned). When I approached the snake it turned toward me in what looked like an aggressive move. I kept my feet about a yard away and began to circle the snake and it kept turning toward me. When I lifted my camera to take a picture the snake made a 90-degree turn toward the side of the road, darted into a bush and disappeared down a small hole. The snake was very fast (although I doubt it could outrun a person) and when it slithered across the asphalt it made a buzzing noise that increased in pitch as it accelerated, somewhat like dragging a pin across a cloth (I assume the sound was made by the scales on the aggregate in the road surface). Now that I've read that coachwhips have a reputation for chasing people, I don't doubt it. Rsduhamel 17:02, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Myths 

message: why are there no citations, inline or otherwise for this article??? also, one link is dead at least on my browser, another links to a czechoslovakian site? i realise wikipedia is worldwide and not confined in any way to the u.s., but this is a north american snake...again i am not implying ownership for myself or any nation, sovereign or otherwise...just curious...i will do what i can as time becomes available, as i am fairly sure most of this information is replicated elsewhere...thanks!Ruraltexas (talk) 09:54, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  citations and links 
Talk:Soldiers' and Sailors' Monument (Cleveland)

message: I will have to see if I can find a online reference... but I know that this monument is one of only 2(???)civil war memorials that depict African American's engaged in combat activities.  I feel that this is a unique facet to this monument and should be included in this article if someone can find a proper reference for it.  Boufa (talk) 06:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black soldiers
Talk:Fax server

message: I edited some material contributed by Julie Deanna which had a very anti-fax-server tone to it. Sure, let's hear all about the alternatives, but this is not the place for attacks or advertising or propaganda! Also worthy of mention is the link spam which has been contributed by Julie Deanna, but that's another discussion. 83.70.78.179 17:10, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Pentecostal Free Will Baptist Church

message: I removed the following from the body of the article and am placing it here:
:The correct name is G.B. Cashwell and his birth date is 1862, not 1826.  Doug Beacham, Oklahoma City, OK
I'm in the middle of categorizing Free Will Baptist pages now but will return and research the issue later if nobody does it first.--WilliamThweatt 17:10, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that the article is incorrect.  From what little I can find about Cashwell's background, it appears that he was born in 1862 (although one source says 1860).  There is also a WP article about him that has his birthdate as 1860, but it is unsourced as well.  I will make the appropriate changes.--WilliamThweatt 22:13, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions on Cashwell's Bio

message: I removed this sentence from the article because it was unclear in meaning and I don't know the history of this movement well enough to correctly edit it:
:The Pentecostal Free Will Baptist Church was formed when four North Carolina Free Will Baptist Conferences merged in 1959.
Does it mean that four NC FWB Conferences merged to form the new group or did four NC FWB Conferences merge and this group was formed by those that didn't participate in the merger?  The second choice seems more likely to me as it was about this time that the FWB Churches officially denounced and discourage "tongues" and other Pentacostal doctrines.  Anybody with knowledge on this, please provide a source.--WilliamThweatt 22:44, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ambiguous sentence
Talk:City Council of Singapore

message: I am quite curious as to why there is a lack of discussion on this topic given the amount of reverting going on here?--Huaiwei 17:10, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is ongoing discussion on this topic. — Instantnood 18:00, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And where is it?--Huaiwei 13:11, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't claim there's no when you don't actually know. — Instantnood 22:09, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh? Yeah indeed I claim whatever I really don't know!--Huaiwei 23:29, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion?

message: sir my name is dr.chit krishnan sing born residing in australia.my late dad C.S SUBRAMANIAN worked for city council as engineer amnd then in mid 60s joined gammon malaya and worked in KL.i would like to know who was responsible for the pipe linking gunam pulai via causeway to sing.is there any record.if so i would like a copy for my family records ta
chit krishnan  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.217.81.69 (talk) 06:25, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  water pipe across causeway 

message: How does Pekanbaru relate to the City Council of Singapore?ZFT (talk) 06:04, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  See Also section 
Talk:List of newspapers in Texas

message: Thank you to Rollins College via the Wikipedia Visiting Scholars program for access to subscription databases used in compiling this article. -- M2545 (talk) 19:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acknowledgment 

message: What is the rationale for deleting the ownership information of the various publications?  In this time where we are seeing the demise of independent media and concentration of ownership, this seems very relevant.  I saw no discussion before this information was removed. H-2-O (talk) 22:08, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  I spent a lot of time in the past updating the ownership information.  I think it is very relevant, especially with stuff like the Gannett newspaper strike going on right now. H-2-O (talk) 19:00, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership Info Deleted
Talk:Doug Jones Average

message: I smell crap here....--124.82.4.76 17:11, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Replaced prod "Tongue-in-cheek suggestion from columnist (archived here [1]) that, except for some occasional links, has never been close to anything like widespread acceptance. Not encyclopedic." JASpencer 19:09, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Jim Hightower]]
Talk:John Brough

message: --24.3.19.143 17:37, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

message: If John Brough is a notable person, the correct thing to do is to write a biographical sketch about him not put these notes on the talk page for a different John Brough. If you need assistance in this, please let me know, I'd be glad to assist in setting up the articles. David 04:58, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Write a new article 

message: He's listed both here and in List of Governors of Ohio as a Republican, but both the article text and other sources I've seen indicate he was a War Democrat elected Governor on a Unionist ticket. Carolina wren (talk) 19:57, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Republican or War Democrat? 
Talk:Sarah Champion (journalist)

message: Removed the link to sarahchampion.info as this is no longer a real website. Euchrid (talk) 02:15, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: They were, but I've tidied it up now. TheRetroGuy (talk) 15:58, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was going to wikify the lead, but chemical fiction is a redlink, wikt:chemical fiction doesn't exist either, nor does any relevant article under Disco Biscuits. Pity the reader. Can we make it more intelligible? Andrewa (talk) 10:50, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemical fiction and Disco Biscuits
Talk:Kathleen Brennan

message: what year was she born? :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PolaroidGirl (talk • contribs) 21:25, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  question... 

message: .. in the attached interview on The Late Late Show on RTE (Irish Television) on 21 Feb 1981, she herself does not mention this. She states that she is 3rd generation Irish American, and the only time she had previously been in Ireland was on a plane from Italy (presumably to the USA) which made an emergency landing in Shannon Airport Ireland.
See from 4m 08s in the following interview from the RTE Archive  
https://www.rte.ie/archives/2016/0217/768724-tom-waits-on-the-late-late/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.21.139 (talk) 13:17, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The page states that she was born in Cork, Ireland... However....
Talk:Dot-com company

message: Could add blo.gs to the list. 24.222.121.193 17:22, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acquisitions List Additions 

message: On the page Network Solutions, it states that the company was aquired by VeriSign for $21bil, however, on this page it states that it was aquired for only $15billion.  I have no way to verify this so can someone clarify this for me?  ^_^;; Pritchard 01:13, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amount Network Solutions was Aquired for 

message: That's because on the article Dot-com bubble there is a section called: List of companies significant to the bubble with a warning For discussion and a list of dot-com companies outside the scope of the dot-com bubble, see Dot-com company.
This article is meant for Dot.com companies that didn't experience the bubble which effectively ended on March 10th 2000. 
I think that section should be moved
EconomistBR 04:51, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 'List of well-known dot-bombs' belongs on the article 'Dot.com Bubble'

message: Kibu.com has no page of its own, but instead is redirected here. This seems strange to me. The other dot-bombs get their own actual pages. Chadoh (talk) 05:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kibu.com redirect 

message: This entry clearly shows three different definitions for a single term in different contexts. I think that's enough for "pure-play" to warrant its own entry page, if not also a disambiguation page. Certainly should not be merged into the dot-com article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Argantael (talk • contribs) 14:13, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Against the merger with Dot-com 

message: Digiscents has been labeled as needing a citation for a while.  Never heard of it before but here is one article http://www.internetretailer.com/2001/05/31/digiscents-runs-out-of-cents  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrededits (talk • contribs) 14:26, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digiscents 
Talk:BMC Otomotiv

message: BMC is now a fully functional manufacturer, its not longer BMC Turkey, its globally successful company. Your links and titles should be changed, BMC should go to current working company. Your descriptions sound like this is written in 1960s where BMC and BMC Turkey was separate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.251.85.238 (talk) 19:47, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links Need Update 

message: BMC's productions for military purposes must be added here too. With respect, Deliogul 17:22, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military 
Talk:Songs of the Free

message: added tracks, personnel, charts. Infinite Zero reissue to be added. --Fantailfan 20:11, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What else do you need? 

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 21:07, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''
Talk:Mimic (Dungeons & Dragons)

message: Place incomplete references here.--Robbstrd 03:32, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete references

message: This is probably reliable.  According to toplessrobot.com, they are a part of village voice media.  The author seems to be a bit of a scholar and a fantasy novelist (I think) and has been commented on in the media."Teague+Bohlen"&btnG=Search&um=1&ned=us&hl=en&scoring=a - 05:34, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think mania.com may be reliable as well, although it doesn't say a ton.  Maybe it's comment could be used in conjunction with the primary source it describes. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 05:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible refs 

message: :We may want some of this later, I don't know. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 18:44, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think most of this information can be sourced, I would suggest moving it all back to the main article.  I added the unreferenced section tag just to denote that it needed sources, not that it all needed to be removed.  Narthring (talk  • contribs) 20:55, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I also think much of this should be restored as it helps prove notability. I was surprised the NetHack mimic wasn't mentioned somewhere in the article, until I looked here. Mark Hurd (talk) 14:44, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Do whatever you think is best (especially sourcing). - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 16:06, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

text:  I noticed that the PC Gamer article already cited in this article mentions multiple games including Mimics, so I included these examples in the article. noktulo (talk) 05:11, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It's probably the fact that you were trying to use a wiki as a source, and wikis themselves (including Wikipedia) are not considered reliable sources. PC Gamer on the other hand, that should be legit. 76.231.73.99 (talk) 12:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from article