Talk:St Michael's Grammar School

message: This section needs explaining. How could there have been a principal and headmistress at the same time? What happened after 1972? Could someone please briefly define the different roles mentioned, and maybe this list should separate people when it leaves holes in the timeline. Harro5 07:22, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: On the contrary, I think any reader of Wikipedia should be able to understand the information in articles. If something is ambiguous, then it needs to be explained. Cnwb 07:22, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with you completely. However, Harro5 did not read the content and is taking the first opportunity to take a direct shot at the page details. Please see his comments page as a number of registered users are making complaints about his attitudes in relation to the schools portal and his condemnation of anything which is not directly written by him. 220.253.48.90 12:39, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Principals 

message: Does the article really need links to 38 different mentions of the school in the media? Cnwb 08:12, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, excess media links have been culled. Mac Bandit 09:00, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excess of media links 

message: I cannot add subject matter regarding exchanges to Japan, Germany, or France. If people who have been on these exchanges could please add this content.
Beyondcapricorn 04:41, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help Needed for Flagship Programs 

message: I've done some fairly major editing and taken out a few sections that are basically irrelevant to the purpose of the article.  If anybody wants to learn the words to the school song, or win a red pocket, they should probably be visiting the official site or organising a tour (they're fairly easy to come by...)   I'm not trying enforce my dogma into Wikipedia, but I think it's fair enough that some stuff can be omitted from the article without causing too much of a crisis. egocentre 11:01, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, http://en.wikipedia.org is not the school.  It's an encyclopedia.  Though I won't re-revert without consensus, I do agree some of the content is more than a little self important.jfg284 11:12, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Well Im glad we've established its comprehensive! Comradeash 11:20, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: My point is (as well as egocentre's from what i can gather) is that there's stuff on this page which has no business being here.  There's no need for it, its unencyclopediac, its non notable, and wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.  They may be important in context of the school, but they aren't in context of an encyclopedia.jfg284 13:18, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Lol yeah, I'll concede the school song/hymn's prescence is a bit rich. I think the small section on the houses at the least should stay though.Comradeash 14:28, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

text: I must say that I agree with Harro on this. It's much better to have a leaner, more readable version. The information contained in the larger version would be of interest only to those contemplating enrolling at St Michael's, and that information could be obtained from their website (or from the Marketing Team they're so proud of). Cnwb 23:07, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevance 

message: The school fees need clarification.  It says $16,500 a year, but for what year level is this?  The fee varies depending on the year level, with the lowest fees generally being the lower year levels, and the highest fee obviously being year 12.  Davez621 04:44, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  School Fees