lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Volvox

message: Regarding the fixing of material in sublimate-acetic mixture, someone mysteriously broadened the possible targets from the Volvocaceae to the Volvocales.  Are we sure this is applicable?
I'm not sure, although this fixing method does seem to have been generally used for all types of algae.  What I do know is that "corrosive sublimate" is "violently toxic", so it has probably been replaced by some other reagent.  If I find out which one, I shall write it up.  -- Heron
volvox moves in water  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.52.91.146 (talk) 14:23, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixing method 

message: I was asked via e-mail why I deleted a link that was not up and running at the time I accessed it--I deleted it originally because it was a bad link, and I could not tell what type of content the site had.  The place to discuss issues of content about an article is on the talk page, not via e-mail, because it is best to reach a general consensus among editors.  However, the deleted link is to a web design consultancy firm, and Wikipedia does not allow commercial spam. There is also a poem about Volvox on the website, however, this either vanity content or personal research, and is, also, not part of Wikipedia.  See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not.  This article does need expanded.  Feel free to add appropriate content.  KP Botany 22:08, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Point taken regarding poem being on the same template that I use for my website - my apologies for that. If you feel the article and prose I have on that page is worthy content, I will happily create a new page that has no reference or links back to the commercial area of my site. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Volvox777 (talk • contribs) 19:23, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is the poem is your original research and creative output.  There's no place for it in an encyclopedia.  KP Botany 19:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link deleted 

message: A computerised algorithm has generated a version of this page using data obtained from AlgaeBase.  You may be able to incorporate elements into the current article. Alternatively, it may be appropriate to create a new page at Volvox (alga). Anybot (contact operator) 16:30, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot-generated content 

message: There's a new diagram on commons  which may be useful to this article.  It is currently being used on wikipedia de, but I don't know enough to put it on this page.  Is it any good?  It's been proposed as a Quality Image on commons... Karora 07:24, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New diagram on commons 

message: Uh, we're learning about algae right now,and before, we treated Volvox, not as algae, but as Protozoa. Could anyone explain this? My teacher told me it's bad information :/ --109.228.94.219 (talk) 19:12, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Green Algae?
Talk:List of Anglo-Saxon monarchs and kingdoms

message: The article should probably be called Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms or perhaps pre-unification kingdoms so Celtic parts can be included? Stan Shebs 07:59 Feb 14, 2003 (UTC)
Our naming conventions would ask for either Anglo-Saxon kingdom (if it has text about the kingdoms in general) or List of Anglo-Saxon kingdoms (if it's nothing but a list).
(List of) Pre-unification kingdom(s) wouldn't be very good, since it needs something to indicate the location.
-- Toby 20:23 Feb 20, 2003 (UTC)
I would think this article (or a sister article under some similar title) should include discussion about the nature and powers of monarchy in the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms, and the various provisions for the succession (hereditary or elected, how often were there usurpers, etc.). Shulgi 16:00, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article seems just to be a list of kings etc, which can be included in the heptarchy article, and doesn't have much reason to stand independent. Sadads (talk) 02:31, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Local anesthetic

message: I have attempted to implement a relationship between some articles as follows:
 Anesthesia
   General Anesthesia
   Regional Anesthesia
   Local Anesthesia
     Local Anesthetic
       Local Anesthetic Toxicity
I strongly recommend that someone take the time to edit the Adverse Effects section to combine and reduce Local Anesthetic Toxicity into a single sub-article.
Anon lynx (talk) 14:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Heirarchy of Articles

message: We need a History section -- this page has some good information Local Anesthetics --Thoric 00:18, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: History Section Proposed

message: The question above.  ANY effect. Chiss Boy 17:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: HELP, Does local anasthesia have any effect on mood and the brain?

message: This doesn't seem to always be the case, because of dimethocaine, maybe it should be removed or qualified? I added several more going by this premise, but seeing as it doesn't seem to always be the case some I may have added might be incorrectly classed. Nagelfar (talk) 19:04, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The names of Amides contain an "i" somewhere before the -aine. Esters do not." 

message: I was merging some text from local analgesia, and came across the following bulk of text (see box below). It seems it is rather an overkill of details, since, IMPOV, the Mechanism of action-section in this article already explains it pretty well, with links to related physiology articles for those who want to know more. However, if you find any important point that should be given here, feel free to complement the article with it. Mikael Häggström (talk) 08:47, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Physiology text from [[local analgesia]] 

message: From here:
"This peculiarity, since called the local anesthetic effect, we now know was produced by the following mechanism: (see figure 2) The membrane of the axon (nerve trunk) is formed by a bimolecular layer of lipids, which possess hydrophilic protein layers on both sides. The local anesthetic is linked by its hydrophilic portion to the corresponding receiver of the nerve membrane and by its lipophilic portion to the other."
This shows a form of active transport *into* the CNS from water soluble to similarly lipid soluble conditions in the body by means of sodium channel blocking of sodium action potentials. Might this be applied in other ways besides "local anesthetic" conceivably?
Nagelfar (talk) 12:23, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cocaine as violating ''in vivo'' rules of "lipophilic / hydrophilic balance" due to "local anesthetic effect" 

message: Does halls contain cough syrup? 45.221.82.44 (talk) 09:48, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halls 

message: As a sodium channel inhibitor and local anesthetic stronger than lidocaine, shouldn't ambroxol be listed here?
Kern KU, Weiser T. Topical ambroxol for the treatment of neuropathic pain. An initial clinical observation. Schmerz. 2015 Dec;29 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S89-96. doi: 10.1007/s00482-015-0060-y. PMID: 26589711; PMCID: PMC4701773. —Sharavanabhava (talk) 06:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambroxol
Talk:1754

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:14, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:List of comedy television series

message: Anyone else think it's kind of weird how the only picture on the page is of Dinosaurs?
:Because when I think of comedy, I think of Dinosaurs. Mole 20:17, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the pictures are all gone now, so the point is moot TheBustopher (talk) 16:13, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dinosaur Pictures?

message: Hey i was just wondering that the Red Dwarf on the UK part says 1988 - present. However, the series ended a while ago now so i thought somebody could find the year it ended? Thanks --Lewisjg 20:13, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Technically this is true, there is a tenth series of Red Dwarf planned for 2012 (let's keep our fingers crossed).  Series 9 was "Back to Earth" - a special 3 part series made in 2008 (broadcast in 2009).  Series 8 was sort of the last full-on shows in 1999 which I guess is sort of the answer you seek. TheBustopher (talk) 13:16, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red Dwarf UK 

message: Friends appears to be listed under both the UK and the US. Since the shows are listed under their country of origin, should Friends not be removed from the UK section? (Unless I'm missing a subtlety.) Paulbuckingham (talk) 03:06, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Friends. 

message: Maximilianklein (talk) 23:06, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: WorldCat Genres

message: Should children's TV be listed? Things like cartoons? I can understand putting in things that are made specifically as comedy, but if cartoons are added then almost every cartoon ever made will qualify and the quality of the page will decrease significantly. At the very least, children's comedy should have its own section or - more likely - its own page.Yb2 (talk) 21:12, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children's stuff 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Can_F**k_Himself Flakey712 (talk) 19:49, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perhaps add this to list of US comedies
Talk:5th millennium BC

message: Sorry to interrupt ya all , but my Assyrian friend here in Iraq has the current year in there calendar as 6756 ( 1 April 2006).
That seems to make a bit of a mockery out of your timelines
The whole thing about Bedazzled should be taken out in my opinion, but I'm not gonna take the responsibility of doing so...  Anyone wanna help me?
===the articles, this and 40th century bc===
I think some people have trouble misunderstanding human history. Alot of people mostly because of the differences that evolution has made in how man looks at himself and the universe. Regardless of what the infidels think. How valid are the ideas that human history started in the garden of eden, or that the world was repopulated by the sons of Noah. Where is mankinds Cradle of Humanity is what im trying to sayPortillo 09:11, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time line  

message: I think some people have trouble misunderstanding human history. Alot of people mostly because of the differences that evolution has made in how man looks at himself and the universe. Regardless of what the infidels think. How valid are the ideas that human history started in the garden of eden, or that the world was repopulated by the sons of Noah. Where is mankinds Cradle of Humanity is what im trying to sayPortillo 09:11, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: the articles, this and 40th century bc

message: I've created a new section called "Mythology" and moved the entry for 4004 there.  4004 is not used by any modern chronologies as it's simply a date calculated by somebody by reference to a creation myth and a biblical chronology.  It's part of a belief system rather than a historical chronology.  --TS 06:45, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mythology

message: This article says world population is "roughly" 40 million, citing Biraben (1979). World population estimates cites a source by Biraben a year later, but does not show any number from it in the table for -5000, and the other estimates listed are 18M, 5M, and 5-20M - half as much as the number given on this page. I don't doubt that 40M may be as good an estimate max as 20M, but it would perhaps be nice if there was consistency between this page and the page on population estimates. --Lasse Hillerøe Petersen (talk) 19:08, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population estimates?
Talk:Battle of Taginae

message: The inflated figure of 35,000 for Narses' army has no validity and requires a far more specific and more reliable source reference than the one offered. The bibliography already contains two academic articles by military specialists in this period. Rance's article in particular contains a very detailed discussion of the size and composition of Narses' army, citing original sources and a large secondary literature (all of which concurs on the figure 20-25,000). John Julius Norwich's book, on the other hand, is a general history of Byzantium written for amateur enthusiasts - it simply will not do.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.247.121.129 (talk) 12:26, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I quite agree that the figure of ca. 25,000 is more likely, and that Norwich's book is a general history, and contains several inaccuracies. I also checked John Haldon's "Wars of Byzantium" and he agrees with your figures. However, in future, when you alter a sourced reference, better provide a new source and the citations that back up your claims. Cheers, Constantine   ✍  12:37, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Army Size

message: paralleling this with Taginae is a bit of a joke, especially in the opening paragraph.
--Tataryn77 (talk) 19:30, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Yom Kippur War not applicable

message: Totila was not killed in action. He fled, was pursued, and he died of his wounds at Caprae (Procopius). The Gothic charge failed, Narses drew his straight line of troops into a crescent, and the short battle ended in the utter rout of the Goths, Totila flying from the field. In that flight one Asbad a Gepid struck at him and fatally wounded him. He was borne by his companions to the village of Caprae, more than twelve miles away, and there he died… (Edward Gibbon). Sirius2044 (talk) 21:40, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Totila, killed in action 

message: Why is Βουσταγαλλώρων‎ referred to as hebrew when it is clearly greek? In section "Deployment"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ReneJensen (talk • contribs) 18:31, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language confusion
Talk:Frankfurt

message: I've put a Cn template on the claim that Frankfurt stayed neutral in the Austro-Prussian War.  Actually, Frankfurt is the last in the list of the twelve allies to Austria given in Austro-Prussian_War#Alliances.  The German sister article also claims Frankfurt actively participated on the Austrian side.  Both may be wrong; but, if so, there should be some source for this (and in that case the articles about the Austro-Prussian War in several wikipedias should be corrected).  My bet would be that instead the fault lies here, however.
The neutrality claim was added here. JoergenB (talk) 20:17, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frankfurt neutrality? 

message: The climate data has been changed to include less than 2 years of data. The data set is from 2019 onwards.
This is an insufficient amount of data for representing Frankfurt's climate.
This must be changed back as it is very misleading.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.211.71.150 (talk) 13:08, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate information changed to a single year of data
Talk:Counties of Sweden

message: Can anyone provide confirmation or links concerning the prospects of replacing the current counties with larger regions? According to the article, these potential regions would then resemble the upcoming reorganization in Denmark and their size would be on par with the EU NUTS regions. :) // Big Adamsky  • BA's talk page 21:28, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: From counties to regions?

message: There are some misunderstandings about this. Malmöhus County and Kristianstad County were amalgamated some years ago. The new county is Skåne County. But it is still a län like all others. The County Coucils (landsting) were also amalgamated. The new Council is commonly referred to as Region Skåne. There is a fundamental difference between the two. The län is a central government agency and the landsting is a local  government entity. Both covering the same territory, but with different tasks. It is the same thing with Västra Götaland County. --Muniswede 21:46, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Counties (län) and landsting/regions

message: In 2008 User:Domino theory changed several names of the former counties. But they form a unity with the current counties. I will change the names back. Some of these old entities existed until the 1990s... TakakaCounty (talk) 23:17, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  County names 

message: Please restore the old names of items in :Category:Former counties of Sweden. Domino theory moved them to new names in 2008, only some have been fixed, e.g. 
* Gothenburg and Bohus County in 2013 by User:Muniswede
* Älvsborg County in 2011 by User:Muniswede
* Malmöhus County in 2011 by User:CapitalR
* Kristianstad County in 2011 by User:CapitalR
Convention for counties of Sweden is "X County" not "County of X", see :Category:Counties of Sweden
Eldizzino (talk) 12:58, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restore county names 

message: The map on the top right section of the article is showing the traditional provinces of Sweden, not the current counties of Sweden (which the article is about). Further down in the article, the correct map of counties is shown, though. Could someone fix? --98.128.186.101 (talk) 23:31, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong picture
Talk:Oder

message: What is the connection between Hungary and Oder? Hungarian names should be included for Slovakia.
Xx236 07:05, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hungarian name 

message: Dziwna, Świna and Peene are not 'three branches' of the Oder, since the Szczecin Lagoon is not a lake, but a part of the Baltic Sea. These three are straits that connect the lagoon to the open sea. That's a common mistake made not only by Poles.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.30.115.24 (talk) 12:38, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Szczecin Lagoon]]
Talk:Diana, Princess of Wales

message: I think it is time to bring this article to GA status because it has the potential. I wanted to leave a message here first before starting the nomination process to see if anyone has any objections before a formal review. Keivan.fTalk 22:47, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bringing to GA status 

message: There is a grammatical error for Diana, Princess of Wales. In the privacy and legal issues section. Spritejhope (talk) 00:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I scanned and didn't find anything. Perhaps if you could copy the offending text here.... HiLo48 (talk) 01:37, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed "Diana lawyers..." to "Diana's lawyers...". Kiwipete (talk) 08:05, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 October 2023 

message: In response to the 08:50, 19 November 2023‎ revert by user @DrKay - please reconsider.  The current text in the article does not accurately reflect her actual title at time of death as it was revised by the Palace in 1996 upon her divorce. Source: https://www.royal.uk/diana-princess-wales 
If there was a particular part of my edit you found excessive I can edit it. But it should be accurate and it is not currently. SassyMay (talk) 09:52, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edit to  "‎Titles, styles, honours and arms:" 

message: A discussion is going on at the Commons concerning the copyright status of several coats of arms that are in use on pages related to British royalty. Please feel free to share your comments and input at :commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Coat of arms of Queen Camilla.svg. Thanks. Keivan.fTalk 18:34, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coats of arms and copyright 

message: Wouldn't it be more accurate to say the first wife of Charles, Prince of Wales (later Charles III)? Just like Anne Hype’s Wikipedia page, the first wife of James, Duke of York, later James II. AlexWillC (talk) 03:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction
Talk:Political regressivism

message: I have found evidence that the term "regressivism" is a real word and  used here - https://twitter.com/regressivism, here - http://robertreich.org/post/23708814586 and here - http://academickids.com/encyclopedia/index.php/Regressivism, amongst other places.Kittysjones (talk) 02:32, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political regressivism (reactionism)
Talk:Dark matter

message: Motsaathebekhanyisile (talk) 07:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: 13.8 billion years. Before that everything was energy, and before that it was basically only geometry. But logic is and has been forever. Sandizer (talk) 05:24, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  How old is matter?
Talk:Cinquain

message: Is "To a Skylark" a good first example for a cinquain? "now" doesn't rhyme with "flow" and "know" according to the rhyme scheme presented. Was it pronounced differently in the 1800s? Can the rhyme scheme vary? Dze27 20:32 Feb 15, 2003 (UTC)
:"Now" and "know" make an imperfect rhyme and a sight rhyme (see rhyme) - things are sometimes classed as rhymes even though they don't match perfectly. In any case, a cinquain can take any rhyme scheme. That said, if you think an example with all perfect rhymes would be better, then by all means replace it (though it should be a well known example for preference).
The link to the "Lanterne" poetry style leads to page on pasta (oops!). Either the link needs to be removed or a new page needs to be created.--Drekadair 15:40, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quintain (poetry) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quintain (poetry) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion.  However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
I've posted this notice here as it may be of interest to editors of this article because, according to Quintain (poetry), cinquain is a type of quintain. --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 17:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[Quintain (poetry)]] for deletion 
Talk:Tia and Tamera Mowry

message: Um: I'm pretty sure it's "Tamera", not "Tamara", but she's called Tamara everywhere in Wikipedia. Am I mistaken? Or should I go through and change every reference?  AJD 03:18, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Did it.  AJD 23:08, 17 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: Hello Tia and Tamera! I've only just heard of you, I haven't seen any of your movies or TV shows or whatever you do, and I haven't the foggiest what you look like. Still, I'm one of your biggest fans, and I would like to write here in the mistaken hope you'll ever get to read it. — JIP | Talk 15:47, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello! 

message: Can we please separate this into Tia Mowry and Tamera Mowry?  I mean, they're probably sick of ALWAYS being spoken and considered together.  --daunrealist 20:53, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Are they historically notable as separate people or just as a duo?  Kaisershatner 17:21, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Removing split tag.  Even the Olsen twins get one page for the two of them.  Kaisershatner 17:22, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separation 

message: The article claims the Sister, Sister show was picked up by UPN after being cancelled from ABC. I thought it moved to WB, not UPN. Q0 05:45, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  UPN 

message: move to "Tia and Tamara" i think would be good. they are known by those names then by antother. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Qrc2006 (talk • contribs) 
:As i explained to you before, Tia and Tamera are not commonly credited by their first names only. Also, please sign your comments. Crumbsucker 10:38, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title