lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of 3D films (2005–present)

message: So the Avatar sequels have been removed from the list mainly Avatar 2 since that's already confirmed to be in 3D (so can we re-add Avatar 2,3,5) MOVIEFAN2001 (talk) 03:15, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Avatar 2 and 3 are already listed. It's too early to include 4 and 5 as there's currently no guarantee they'll actually get made. Barry Wom (talk) 06:55, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to the Avatar sequels? 

message: I just added the 2023 Disney films The Little Mermaid and Haunted Mansion as DNEG's website is listing them in the stereo section of their site aswell as mentioning the names of the stereo supervisors. Since I cited DNEG's website for those 2 films would that be a reliable source to add to the list? MOVIEFAN2001 (talk) 10:19, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see why a company providing 3D services shouldn't be considered a reliable source. I've gone ahead and added some titles that are listed on their site. Barry Wom (talk) 13:05, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable Sources 

message: If there's a distinction between these two terms, it's not made clear. 2A02:8012:721D:1:78B2:5112:F761:369 (talk) 13:04, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and edited to "Filmed" when I realized how prevalant that term was. 2A02:8012:721D:1:78B2:5112:F761:369 (talk) 13:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Filmed" vs "Shot"?
Talk:List of films featuring the United States Marine Corps

message: Below is a list of borderline films that were removed from the page during my rewrite.. ones where I was not certain, or did not have an article with the information available to make the call on inclusion or deletion. -- saberwyn 11:28, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Of this list I would say the only one that really belongs is The D.I. with Jack Webb.  The only movie that is truly about the Marine Corps.  The only other one that I can think of that is not here is a movie called The Boys in Company "C"--Looper5920 11:36, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, but we should also add Halls of Montezuma (film) (I have eddited the name above so it links right) so I have added it to the article.  I have also just added 7-8 WW2 era films about the Marine Corps. CsikosLo (talk) 14:37, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Borderline films 

message: I just went in and added some headers.  I was having a hard time with the edits (adding films) because there was so much data to wade through.  This should make it a little easier.  Other than that, I didn't add, delete, or move anything.  However, I think we should discuss moving stuff around.  It would make more sense to put the "what's in/what's out" stuff right before the list of films, which would put the history first.  Also, it will be some work, but the films should be in chronological or alphabetical order.  What do y'all think?CsikosLo (talk) 14:43, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting 

message: I think we might consider expanding the scope of this article to include television shows and books. However, to prevent the list from exploding into a cruft collection and getting deleted, we could declare that the media has to already by notable enough for its own article in order to be notable enough for the list. Any thoughts? bahamut0013♠♣  17:25, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is already more than a list with an interesting history section expanding the scope and a rename to something like the United States Marine Corps in fiction would provide a measure of insulation from those with deletionist tendencies (the word list in the title is a bit of a lightning rod for deletionists.)KTo288 (talk) 23:57, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  expand scope 

message: A Marine Story
I am pretty sure that might be borderline but I put it out there... the framework seems very important as for being a marine and about the civil life of both main characters.--Hector Bosch (talk) 14:33, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion 

message: They forgot 1926 Tell It To The Marines with Lon Chaney 2603:7080:E843:D132:8DFB:74D6:EE8F:E3B0 (talk) 15:53, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  They forgot 1926 Tell It To The Marines with Lon Chaney
Talk:List of live-action films based on cartoons and comics

message: The bulk of the comics are dealt with elsewhere (in particular List of films based on English-language comics) and I was wondering what to do with this entry. The solution seems to me to be refocusing it and moving it to: List of films based on cartoons as this would be a useful addition to the range of related entries. Thoughts? (Emperor 16:26, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I should add that there are some items there which don't fit into comics or cartoons (like Stuart Little and the Cat in the Hat) but these are dealt with here: List of children's books made into feature films (Emperor 17:14, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Refocus?

message: *Split As I discuss above the bulk of the items listed are covered in entries like List of films based on comics and List of children's books made into feature films so what we need to do is split those off and add them to the relevant entries (if needed) and the rest of this entry moved to List of films based on cartoons which would be a well focused and useful list. (Emperor 21:06, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed;this article should be moved to List of films based on cartoons with the comic/children's book portions removed. If desired, I can move and edit it. ~ Wakandas black panther 11:31, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone going to work on this?  Cartoons and comics do not have enough in common to be lumped together. Rhindle The Red 00:15, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed that the comics are already listed elsewhere.  What about movies for G.I. Joe and Transformers?  To promote their toy lines, they had a comic book and a cartoon made at the same time.  Which one influenced the movie?  And is it based on either the comic or the cartoon, or just on the toys themselves?  Dream Focus 01:40, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have updated the List of films based on cartoons to include the films listed here. In my opinion, this page no longer needs to exist because films based on comics, comic strips, and cartoons are all listed elsewhere on more useful pages. If someone would like to create a list of films based on toys, feel free as one doesn't seem to exist. Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 21:13, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: Was wondering if this list included anime if so i can add a few let me no --Aussie 99 (talk) 04:16, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Anime counts as cartoons.  Animation might be a better name for this article, or animated shows.  Dream Focus 01:38, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Does this include Anime
Talk:Edwin Chadwick

message: Hi I'm Yeena, a student looking into editing this page on Edwin Chadwick for a class on the history of modern medicine. I specifically want to expand upon Chadwick's role as a reformer in the 19th century, and his long lasting impacts on public health. I will mainly be focusing on Chadwick's life from the point in which he entered politics, and outline the various projects he took on within his 22 years of political activity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yyoon18 (talk • contribs) 23:30, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Reformer 
Talk:Henry Hetherington

message: *Could someone check whether the misspelling of 'supersede' in the pamphlet title is Hetherington's (in which case it should stand, possibly with a "[sic]") or ours (in which case it should be corrected)?
Cheap Salvation; or, An Antidote to priestcraft: Being a Succinct, Practical, Essential, and Rational Religion, Deduced from the New testament, the general Adoption of Which Would Supercede the Necessity for a Hireling Priesthood, and save This Overtaxed Nation Fifteen Million per Annum. London: Henry Hetherington, 1838.
Brequinda (talk) 12:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There was an unreferenced claim of this man allegedly communicating with mediums. Really? Sorry, I don't think this type of ridiculous claim belongs on wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.51.44.149 (talk) 01:11, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim about communication from beyond the grave 

message: I have rewritten this article to provide more information and citations. I have flagged up two sections which, in my opinion, need numerous citations and would welcome the views of other editors as to how to sort them out. RedKite (talk) 09:54, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Richard Carlile

message: This article refers to Richard Carlile's wife as Jane. Surely this is confusion with the wife of Thomas Carlyle. Richard Carlile's wife was Elizabeth Sharples Carlile. (Harasseddad (talk) 16:23, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Richard Carlile's wife was Jane. They separated and he then lived with, but did not marry, Eliza Sharples. RedKite (talk) 21:29, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:   [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]]
Talk:List of British comedy films

message: Maximilianklein (talk) 23:06, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: WorldCat Genres

message: The 20s to 1975 are in chronological order, then 1975 onward are in alphabetical order per decade. Somebody should really make that consistent.
82.4.129.255 (talk) 17:11, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconcsistency in ordering within decade
Talk:List of films based on DC Comics publications

message: Guys, why is there no sign of "Return to the batcave: Misadventure of Adam and Burt" at all in this page?
I mean is there something wrong about it? Hosein Fitz (talk) 13:15, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: And there is no "The Spirit" while   https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spirit_(comics_character)     this page says it was published by DC Comics. Hosein Fitz (talk) 13:20, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I could be mistaken but at a glance it looks like while The Spirit was briefly introduced to the DC Universe and had some comics published by them, it was more of a crossover type thing than an official addition to the canon. As far as I can tell DC never actually owned the character or anything (their more recent comics were published by other publishers), and they had no involvement in the 2008 film (it also looks like the film was in the works before the DC comics crossovers). So I don't think it makes sense to consider that a film based on a DC Comic. ShyKen (talk) 13:34, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Return to the Batcave is considered a TV Special, which are generally listed on List of television series based on DC Comics publications rather than here ShyKen (talk) 13:22, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh right, thank you🤕❤ Hosein Fitz (talk) 13:29, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Return to the batcave: Misadventure of Adam and Burt 

message: superman 2 did 216 million according to box office mojo the source you guys picked and its own wikipedia page says 190. where is the 108 number coming from? superman 3 is at 80 million for not 50 or whatever. Snowty20000 (talk) 01:40, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: 108 is the domestic number.. It looks all of the Superman sequels (and Supergirl) are not including the worldwide number.. just the North American number. This should be fixed. Spanneraol (talk) 14:49, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and updated the numbers per the current Box Office Mojo listings... I can't figure out how the totals work though as the hidden numbers in the computation thing dont seem to match anything. Spanneraol (talk) 16:31, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: the box office number looks like they took the box office mojo source and added on the films that came after numbers to create the total, but they took the domestic number and not world wide accidentally for superman sequels. i think its fixed now. Snowty20000 (talk) 03:22, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  why are box office numbers off? 

message: Corrected the title of the Blackhawk serial based upon its actual on-screen title, not what is just on the poster. 23skidoo (talk) 16:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Blackhawk title
Talk:Louis Ducros House

message: no longer exists.  Dlohcierekim  16:19, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It was moved. Photo added. --Ebyabe (talk) 18:12, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  address 
Talk:George P. Putnam

message: MERGE? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Palmer_Putnam
:nope, unless he was his own grandfather. --scruss 14:53, 6 October 2020
 (UTC)
::Cute! FWIW Bzuk 14:59, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: In various documents, news stories, etc. George Putnam husband of Amelia is named George Putman. 
The confusion existed during his life; TIGHAR has documents of the time calling him Putman.
Many documents still make this mistake. For instance, 
http://convergencetheblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/20/amelia-earhart-george-putman-were-polyamorous/ 
http://www.ameliaearhart75thanniversary.com/did%20you%20know.htm (here it's spelled both ways)
http://www.myhero.com/myhero/hero.asp?hero=a_earhart
http://library.thinkquest.org/J001621/earhart.html
To add to the confusion there is a Putman Publishing Company,
http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/product-compint-0001212704-page.html
as well as the G.P Putnam's Sons, which is the company founded by his grandfather (which is one way to ascertain which name is correct.)
The article ought to have a sentence or two explaining that the alternate Putman is incorrect but has often been used. Researchers looking only for one will miss articles that use the other.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.232.138.222 (talk) 21:20, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternate Last Name Putman

message: per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Capital_letters#Section_headings the number itself serves as the capital, just as in article names like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1970s_energy_crisis . --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 22:31, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization of headers 

message: Which is now considered the proper term for a women who flies a plane? John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:22, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aviatrix or aviator
Category talk:Grammatical tenses

message: The category's current name, text, and scope, taken together, are gravely misleading; for example, it's not that "some may disagree with" the categorization of (for example) the participle as a grammatical tense, but rather that no one would ever agree with it.
This category should be given a less precise name, to reflect its imprecise scope; say, Category:Verb forms.
Ruakh 20:34, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Henry Compton (bishop)

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Henry Compton by Sir Godfrey Kneller, Bt.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on September 12, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-09-12. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! —howcheng  {chat} 16:59, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Henry Compton by Sir Godfrey Kneller, Bt.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Turmion Kätilöt

message: It can be seen that I have restructured the page to include a clear "biography" section.  There are a myriad of issues with this section that need to be addressed.  Principly
*References - Can we please reference as many things as possible and try not to do so from the band's own page if you can help it.
*Information - The biography is rather lacking, starting as it does at the second album.  Any Finnish speakers may want to investigate the Finnish Wikipedia page to see how it should be done.
There are other issues too, but this is enough for now. Floydiac (talk) 17:02, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that the Finnish article, though comprehensive, does have some false information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Floydiac (talk • contribs) 17:13, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography
Talk:Chevrolet Spectrum

message: I owned a 1987 Chvrolet Spectrum 4 door turbo sedan (purchased new in the summer of 1988) and had read the brochures and read numerous articles in popular car magazines of the day about the car. Notable was a 1987 article in Car and Driver comparing ten or eleven 'hot hatches' in which the Isuzu version of the Turbo Spectrum fared poorly and the Acura Integra (which I also owned) won the comparo. 
There was a slight restyle of the vehicle in 1987, notably the switch from square halogen headlights to wider flush mounted units. The Turbo model was introduced in 1987, as a sedan only. Standard features on the Turbo sedan included an AM/FM radio, a horizontal boost guage, and bridgestone RE88 performance tires on 14" wheels with hubcaps. In 1988 a Turbo hatchback joined the lineup, and a rear spoiler, alloy wheels, cassette stereo and right side mirror made added as standard features to the Turbo sedan.
The Turbo models were dropped from the 1989 model at the same time Chevrolet switched the cars to the Geo brand. 1989 was the last model year of the Spectrum in the US market.
I have no images of my spectrum (lost almost all of my pics in a move) but know the model differences and can single out any pics i see online to add to the wiki, that wold help show the differences between various models.
Lastly, when I got my car, I read a comment about it having the worst crash statistics of any subcompact currently sold (in 1987 or 88') in America. I can try to find that source as well.
Neworderrr 20:40, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:1553

message: Deleted reference to MIL-STD-1553 as it has nothing to do with a history page, this is not a numbers page. Dfoley51 20:42, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the reference to use the standard template for such disambiguation links. 128.158.145.51 20:10, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Break, Break, Break (film)

message: There is also a poem by Lord Alfred Tennyson of the same name. Any resemblence? Userpie 23:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The title comes from the poem. Added source.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 02:07, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * Steve T • C 22:25, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations for use 

message: There is some conflict with sources. University of California gives Sydney Ayres as Director. IMDB gives Ayres as writer and Harry A. Pollard as director. Ty 22:25, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm. The Library of Congress' "Catalog of Copyright Entries" (Motion pictures, 1912–1939) has Ayres as the writer. Do we know where UC got its information? Steve T • C 22:57, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No idea. It doesn't help that both Pollard and Ayres were directors and writers. UC also has Break! Break! Break! for the title with exclamation marks. Ty 23:16, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Director/Writer
Talk:Open source Unix

message: There are many Unix variants - only some of them are open source. It's only since about 1998 that *any* open-source Unix variants have become interesting for the general computing public. If someone wants to link to open source Unix specifically, it's a good bet that they don't intend to talk about Unix in general. What's the argument in the other direction? --Alvestrand 20:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You have created a useless stub, for a term that does not get used anywhere.  First, there is only one actual UNIX which is open source, Solaris, the others are all Unix-like, partially POSIX compliant operating systems which lack enough components to get Unix certification.  Second, the subject matter that could be contained here is already covered entirely in the Unix-like article.  Your stub serves no purpose, you want the bottom section of the Unix-like article, which is why it was redirected there, this was already dealt with when someone wanted to make an article for Freenix.  Janizary 19:17, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate page vs redirecting to Unix
Talk:James Beard

message: The article claimed "In 1946 he appeared on the first cooking show ever televised, I Love to Eat on NBC.." but the book "Television broadcasting" by Lenox Lohr, New York: McGraw Hill(1940) says pp 78-79 "Television programs of cooking lessons have proved interesting, at least to housewives. One such program was built around the arrival of an unexpected guest, illustrating how a meal was prepared from what was on the pantry shelves." NBC tv in New York did extensive broadcasting  1939 through 1941, and remained on the air with minimal broadcasting through world war II. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Edison (talk • contribs) 20:54, 3 October, 2006 (UTC).
:If that book clearly states this, then it can be used as a reference, and the line about Beard being on the first cooking show can be removed. Or perhaps it can be amended to say something like: "It is often thought that James Beard was the first person to appear on a cooking show, however this book says otherwise etc..." --Mattarata 02:20, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  done. Philvarner 23:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

text: The BBC showed their first televised cookery demonstration on 9 Dec 1936 FlagSteward 12:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cooking shows on tv

message: For help with article cleanup, please take a look at The Wikipedia Manual of Style. Thanks. Katr67 (talk) 00:19, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:SOFIXIT.  Wait, I just did.  Sad that such simple changes have been sitting around for nearly three years... María (habla conmigo) 01:56, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manual of Style 

message: Virtually all contestants on Top Chef are James Beard award winner for something or other. Just how many awards are presented in his name? Since so many chefs have so many James Beard awards, it seems rather ordinary. --69.148.250.94 (talk) 04:57, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top Chef contestants 

message: " he was raised by Thema and Let," Who?
Actio (talk) 01:39, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  chinese helpers? 

message: *https://oregonencyclopedia.org/articles/beard_james_1903_1985_/#.WUGycxiZO1s ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:02, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  OE source
Talk:Knickerbocker

message: Uh, the Knickerbocker family's "prestige," "power," and "estimated wealth" sound like patent nonsense to me.  So far as I know, no branch of my family has ever been involved in any of the prominent businesses that use our name.
What IS interesting about the Knickerbocker family, meanwhile, is that it has a well-established single ancestor in America, Harmen Jansen.  The family name grew out of combinations of various combinations of appellations he used, and whatever meaning it had is probably lost forever.
Not R 20:56, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Family

message: um...who is "Father Knickerbocker?" isnt it Diedrich Knickerbocker?
Egg1111115 (talk) 01:31, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Father

message: The original surname was a trade name: knikker = marble, bakker = baker. 1, 2, 3, words of Dutch originHakluyt bean (talk) 18:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning
Talk:Martinsville, New Jersey

message: Martinsville Somerset County's "most affluent neighborhood"? What are the people in Far Hills, Peapack-Gladstone, Bernardsville and (most importantly) Bedminster, then? Chopped liver?
There needs to be a citation for this edit. Daniel Case 20:57, 3 October 2006 (UTC)