lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:USS De Grasse (AK-223)

message: The DANFS article on this ship was updated in March 2007 . --Brad (talk) 01:47, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: DANFS Article

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:45, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Talk:One Small Step (Star Trek: Voyager)

message: Given that this show was broadcast in 1999, which was the 30 year anniversary of the Moon Landing which this episode is named for, I wondered if there was any deliberate aim for this to be some kind of celebration of Apollo 11. -- PaulHammond (talk) 11:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anniversary of Moon Landing?
Talk:Tinker, Tenor, Doctor, Spy

message: The article is certainly poorly written, but this episode of Voyager is no more or less notable than any other episode of the show.  Do we have people who are now opposed to episode guides in Wikipedia? Cjoshuav 20:34, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The notability guidelines on WP:EPISODE suggest that it needs to have "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".  The google test shows more than 9000 hits, mostly from unofficial third-party sites (ie: not operated by Paramount) that review or discuss the episode, which seems to at least establish its popularity though not necessarily notability. -- Bovineone 00:26, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

text: To Cjoshuav; all it does take is one editor with a beef. I've been seeing similar things across Wikipedia. Personally, I hope that if someone does not care for the episode pages, they simply do not go to them.Lots42 15:43, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I don't see how any part of the Trivia section matters to the article. A lot of things resemble a lot of other things.
Lots42 05:24, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the alien appearance item is possibly just coincidence.  However, the other items (in particular the episode title correspondence to the book) are useful and probably noteworthy. -- Bovineone 05:33, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia
Talk:Sunday Star-Times

message: As you've seen, I've moved this article to The Sunday Star–Times, replacing the hyphen with an endash. My edit summary read: "needs endash as per MOS:DASH". You say in your revert: "get a consensus first" 
I have to say that I'm a bit puzzled by that, given that the Manual of Style is the consensus of the Wikipedia community. Or are you suggesting that the MOS needs some further interpretation as to whether I applied it correctly? Schwede66 06:01, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Consensus normally done if the move is contested, and not just technical (WP:RM#CM). According to their website, either a star (★), space ( ) or hyphen (-) is used in between the last two words. They don't appear to use an en dash (–), but don't let me stop you from starting a move discussion. +mt 06:55, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert of endash
Talk:Morningside, Edinburgh

message: I'm not convinced it's relevant to say Fred Goodwin's residence is in nearby Marchmont(although I'd have palced it in The Grange). Suggest removing this as it adds nothing in relation to Mornignside.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cronoz (talk • contribs) 09:07, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fred Goodwin's residence 

message: Can we decide on a section format to apply to all areas of edinburgh - the info in each is in a different order and it looks bad.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesx12345 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout 

message: We could add living people like
* James Naughtie, journalist and broadcaster - long term and notable resident.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.194.24 (talk) 07:20, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Residents 

message: I have substantially edited this article, as follows:
* Added new material, including citations.
* Reorganised the sections to more closely match those of articles on other town and districts.
* Removed a couple of notable residents for which I could find no useful citations. Feel free to reinstate if you have more information.
* Still to do: I want to reinstate and expand the sub-section on the origin of street names once I have found some useful citations.
* Removed the "This article has multiple issues" flag. 
Mike Marchmont (talk) 14:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Good additions. Next step would be restructure as per [[Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements LordHarris (talk) 12:02, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: September 2020 edits

message: At 16:28, 12 November 2021, an IP editor added a statement to the effect that the clock was temporarily moved because of a large number of car crashes. I can  find no evidence for this assertion, which I have flagged as "citation needed". Can someone provide a reference for this? If not, I intend to delete it. Thank you. Mike Marchmont (talk) 09:50, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morningside Clock
Talk:USS New Bedford (PF-71)

message: The online DANFS has no listing for this ship. The hazegray entry seems to be missing. The link at navsource seems to be the only one left out there. Additionally, the Naval Vessel Register has an entry for a New Bedford but that entry doesn't seem to match this one. Perhaps we're dealing with two different ships with poor documentation. --Brad (talk) 20:57, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mystery ship
Talk:Spiritualists' National Union

message: Categories have been changed in accordance with the recent Arbitration on the paranormal, specifically 6a) Adequate framing, and Cultural artefacts. Martinphi (Talk Ψ Contribs) 21:07, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category change
Talk:USS Allegheny (1847)

message: Page was tagged with Wikify tag.
Wikified entire page, updated ship infobox, used existing text and verified with DANFS, made some very minor fixes, updated links to ships, and provided various other links not yet linked. Added See Also, cats, etc.
Revised front-end of page to provide a brief summary as intro paragraph.
Added "See also" to the "Hunter Wheel" after the 2nd paragraph as the mechanism of this wheel is described there and is an interesting developmental invention, though not practical.
No illustration found at either DANFS sites.Wikited (talk) 17:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgraded page
Talk:Abnaki-class tugboat

message: Can someone confirm that the USS Jicarilla, famous for surviving Typhoon Cobra in 1944, was an Abnaki Class tug?  If so, it should be included in the list.  I believe she was sold to Colombia, and finally sunk as an artificial reef in 2004.74.239.2.104 (talk) 16:02, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Tugs 

message: On the chart, Nipmuc (ATF-157) is spelled Nimpuc, but the link goes to the correct page  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.28.100.7 (talk) 20:14, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  USS Nipmuc mis-spelled
Talk:Universal Copyright Convention

message: The Berne Convention, on the other hand, provided for copyright protection for a single term based on the life of the author, and did not require registration or the inclusion of a copyright notice for copyright to exist. Thus the United States would have to make several major modifications to its copyright law in order to become a party to it. At the time the United States was unwilling to do so.
As far as I know, the United States are a member of The Berne Convention: Contracting Parties  > Berne Convention. Am I right? Do we need to correct the article?--Mormat 09:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  United States 
Talk:Broomhouse, Edinburgh

message: * Removal of a potentially malicious SPAM-Domain-Link: (RBN 369)
* hxxp://www.sbpcc.co.uk/
* http://urlquery.net/report.php?id=3501354
* http://urlquery.net/screenshot.php?id=3501354
* http://www.UnmaskParasites.com/security-report/?page=www.sbpcc.co.uk
* http://quttera.com/detailed_report/www.sbpcc.co.uk
--Gary Dee 11:58, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  SPAM Link Removal 
Talk:USS Zebra

message: ...the article still misses a lot at the moment, like
* what did Zebra look like, how was she built? The article says a) that she was a Liberty ship, which is pretty clear; but then b) in the first sentence there is a red reference to "Indus-class". Is that a clarification or a contradiction?
* what is this "net gear" story all about (are we talking about steel nets as a protection against floating mines? If so, I would really expect a link to a page explaining this stuff!! If not available, give some detail here - like: what was the average weight or size of a single unit of... well, "net"?)
* how was Zebra seen as especially fit to handle "net gear"? What was her cargo hold configuration, what kind of loading gear did she have?
to finish this on a positive note, her operational history is certainly explained very well. Good start! --Himbeerkuchen (talk) 07:32, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Please...
Talk:St Martin's College

message: Some work is needed to coordinate this article with the University of Cumbria article. Currently there is a mix of past and present tense, and it's not clear whether parts of the article are referring to the former college or to what now occurs on this campus as part of the University. Probably some of the material here should be removed and put into the University article instead? If not, it should be made clear what is being discussed. -- Dr Greg  talk  18:32, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I still have the same feeling about this article today. If my understanding is correct, this article should only talk about the former establishment, and only provide the basic relevant links and information about the merger and re-opening. I'll start to make some changes. --David Edgar (talk) 13:29, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Useful reference]- I found while researching whether William Thompson had a 'p' in his name for a Clitheroe Castle Museum link. I note that we haven't an article on Dr Hugh Pollard, OBE, Order of Vasa.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ClemRutter (talk • contribs) 09:42, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification required
Talk:USS Agawam (1863)

message: Replaced old blue restrictive infobox with newest type of ship infobox.
Added data to the new infobox.
Replaced infobox photo with a clearer photo of the ship.
Added two photos (one of the crew, one of the officers) down in the text.
Edited first paragraph for clearer description of career of the ship.
Wikified page after verifying data with DANFS.
Added 'see also,' ref, minor edits and fixes.Wikited (talk) 14:56, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgraded page
Talk:Screaming Meemees

message: Checking the 1983 Sweetwaters poster reveals the band did not have top billing, so I have corrected this. 
Tahatai (talk) 21:25, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  1983 Sweetwaters billing
Talk:USS Pine Island

message: My Grandfather, Jack Keller, served during the waning months of WWII on a PBM MAriner attached to this ship. The meager writeup on it's service during this time does not reflect what he told me. GrandDad said that they not only did air/sea rescue, but also conducted antisubmarine ops - I could go on for pages of what he told me when he finally spoke of it, but it is, after all, hearsay and I am unsure if it belongs in a factual statement - even though the last person who would ever embellish a story was Gramps. I'll leave it at this; ask, and ye shall receive. james_barnes@clearwire.net  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.195.125.135 (talk) 07:05, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:USS Zeppelin

message: The account of the wreck here heavily depends on the Titanic source, which doesn't look terribly reliable to me. It conflicts with that in the German Wikipedia article, in the Home.online source also used here, and in a book on the KdF ships that I have in front of me: Heinz Schön, Die KdF-Schiffe und ihr Schicksal: eine Dokumentation, Stuttgart: Motorbuch, 1987, , pp. 15–19, 232. Schön's version is that she was under pilotage (pilot's last name: Jakobsen) when she struck the shoal in heavy weather due to a displaced buoy; the ship instantly began to settle but the pilot and captain successfully beached her on the island; everyone was got off safely, although there were injuries to "14 persons and the cook" that required hospitalization, the cook having 2 broken ribs and a woman arm and leg fractures; one lifeboat foundered during transfer of passengers to the Kong Haakon and two women almost drowned since they were not wearing lifejackets, but were rescued by crew members; there were no serious incidents involving the other vessel that rescued people, the French inspection vessel Ardente; the only deaths were two female passengers (the book names them) who died of heart failure aboard Kong Haakon. She sank on 21 June after lasting unexpectedly long, long enough for items such as the ship's bell to be retrieved, and there is even a photograph on p. 19 of the captain rowing away as she settles sideways. Nothing whatsoever about a death during passenger transfer or 4 deaths during salvage, and nothing about her being refloated. The Titanic source seems to be unusual in those details. I hesitate to just impose this book's version, but I think this could usefully be investigated; it's possible there was a cover-up and grimmer details have emerged since the book's publication in 1987, and German Wikipedia does have the 4 salvors' deaths, but their source for that is rootsweb, "an ancestry.com community", so I think I'm looking at a superior source. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:37, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Wreck
Talk:Shoptime

message: Should Atual be Actual in the first two headings, perhaps? Wprlh (talk) 18:35, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should Atual be Actual in the first two headings, perhaps?
Talk:Dayang Nurfaizah

message: This is excessive and reads resume like at this length. Should be trimmed down to notable awards.--AhmedFaizP (talk) 19:20, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards, accolades and achievements 
Talk:USS Neosho (1863)

message: Removed old blue infobox and replaced it with newer light blue ship infobox. Upgraded info in infobox and added existing pix to top. Wikified entire page, and added second photo in lower portion of page. Added See also, cats, ref, etc. Minor edits, fixes, links.Wikited (talk) 23:32, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgraded page
Talk:Public holidays in Bermuda

message: Changed the apostrophisation from "Somer's" to "Somers'" Day, as it's named after Sir George Somers.  Official websites use either Somers or Somers', although several unofficial sites use the 's form.
See
*http://www.thecommonwealth.org/YearbookInternal/140416/140418/bermuda/
*http://www.bsx.com/Holidays.asp
*http://www.qppstudio.net/bankholidays2010/bermuda.htm
 Rojomoke (talk) 22:05, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Somers Day
Talk:USS Terror (CM-5)

message: An interesting fact of the USS Terror (CM-5) was the mascot. He came aboard the ship in the early days in the pocket of a sailors pea coat. The dog, whose name became Error, eventually had his own service jacket, in which was kept his own rate and number. Chief dog, (AA) 000 000 00. there was a clear record kept of  leave, absentees, missing ship, and conduct. he was considered just as much  a member of the crew as any other onboard.
<ref> book given to my granfather who served aboard the Terror during wwII. book was given to my grandfather by the US Navy. It includes pictures of the ship and crew, and various other details.
MilHistBot (talk) 06:47, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  mascot of the USS Terror
Talk:Cimarron-class oiler (1939)

message: I'm not about to change anything, but I was on the Waccamaw when various ships with T2 hulls broke in half and sunk in the Atlantic in the late 50s. Knowledgeable shipmates cheerfully volunteered that the Waccamaw was a T2 hull! And no, I don't believe they were trying to pull anyone's leg! Chain, maybe, but not leg!   :) Student7 (talk) 20:36, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: T2?

message: I don't have a citation for the statement about naval aviators commanding oilers, but I know it was common practice while I was on active duty during the Vietnam war years.  The generally accepted reason was to give the aviator some experience with handling a deep-draft ship before he was entrusted with one of the Navy's few carriers.  It was generally accepted that only an experienced naval pilot could realize the fullest combat potential of an aircraft carrier; but pilots with that kind of flight experience generally had comparatively little experience with running a ship.  So a pilot successfully completing a command tour of an aircraft squadron was offered a command tour of an oiler; and, if his oiler didn't run aground or collide with another ship while under his command, he was considered eligible for command of an aircraft carrier.  The non-flying naval officers sometimes claimed it was necessary to assign a non-flying surface warfare commanding officer (CO) to the oiler after each prospective carrier CO to get the oiler "squared away" again with respect to normal shipboard routines. Thewellman (talk) 08:39, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope you have placed this "XO" becoming "CO" someplace in a higher level article about the Navy. Hadn't heard of this before. Student7 (talk) 20:35, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Aviation Commanding Officers
Talk:Social Democratic Party of Montenegro

message: Some ideologies of this party are listed as “Montenegrin nationalist” and “cultural conservative”. These have been added without consulting, and the citations lead to news articles that analyse parliamentary speeches of a member of the party. There are multiple things wrong with this.
- The speeches obviously do not represent “nationalism”, it’s patriotism, if that
- The speeches don’t represent any form of conservatism either, once again, probably patriotism in the first one and secularism in the second
- Now, for the undebatable: one MP does NOT represent a whole party’s orientation
I am not doing this to give the party a good reputation, but to not give it a bad one. I don’t support any of the parties in my country as they’re all corrupt and basically the same, but, due to the public political crisis, a lot of Wikipedia pages get spammed with slight anti-EU-orientated-party propaganda to make certain politicians and parties look bad to outsiders and to favour more right-wing, Serb nationalist parties (that often deny the Montenegrin ethnicity, language and culture, along with working with the church and the Serbian government) CertifiedShrigmaMale (talk) 12:14, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong ideologies
Talk:Shirley Boys' High School

message: The first of the issues covered in this section at present covers an isolated incident of a violent attack on a student in the school grounds. Regrettably, such incidents are relatively common, but many will never reach the news. There is a significant risk that including this in the article gives a misleading impression of the school as a whole. The second of the issues concerns the findings of a survey of high school students about their experience of sexual harassment. The scope of the survey included the students experience "at school, online, or when socialising outside school grounds". So the scope of the survey goes far beyond just what happens at school. Again, I  am concerned that including this in the article gives a misleading impression of the school as a whole.
I propose that the entire section should be deleted.  Comments please, before I action this.Marshelec (talk) 05:26, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I support the removal with the reasons provided. —Panamitsu (talk) 05:31, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

text: I support the removal of the section. yvanyblog(talk) 05:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies section - undue weight
Talk:Snagajob

message: It sounds a bit familiar, simmilar to Andy Partridge maybe?  --Morbid-o 04:19, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music on the commercial? 

message: These comments are based on the 08:57, 4 January 2017‎ version of the article [about] "Snagajob", ...which was the current version of that article "as of" the day when these comments were written. 
The second sentence of the lede begins by saying "Founded in 2000". Is that even true? (in some sense?) When I did a search (e.g., a "Ctrl-F" -type "FIND" command) for the character string "1999" within this article, then ... it turned up 4 places: 
* two in categories [mentioning "established in 1999" or otherwise relating to when Snagajob was "started"], 
* one "1999" in the "" template [instance] -- (right next to the word "Founded"!) -- 
and 
* one in the body of the text, mentioning an event ("the website's launch") on "October 17, 1999". 
Is it me, or is there some disconnect here? IMHO, unless those (multiple) "1999" instances are all false /slash "misleading", well... then either that "2000" (in the second sentence of the article) is BOGUS, or else ... at least, someone may have -- (as the Lucy/Desi [apochryphal?See e.g., http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2013/10/best-sitcom-one-liners/lucy-youve-got-some-splaining-to-do] line would have it) -- some 'splaining to do. 
Any comments? --Mike Schwartz (talk) 16:46, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Founded in 2000"? In what sense is that true?
Talk:USS Marmora (1862)

message: The USS Marmora was one of the first iron clads in history, it was made of Iron and nickel. 32.142.141.250 (talk) 18:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not accurate. None of the sources I consulted for this article refer to Marmora as an ironclad warship, nor the use of nickel in her construction. Hog Farm  Talk 02:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  USS Marmora Materials
Talk:USS Camanche (1864)

message: Madam, Sir,
Whilst scanning Library of Congress - Prints & Photographs Online Catalog, I came across:
"Turret engines of Monitor CAMANCHE, San Francisco": http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2002725350/ .
The "Rights Advisory" does state: "No known restrictions on publication".
Perhaps:
- This picture is of any interest to You?
- You will be able to "get" a picture "between" 65kb JPEG and 2,1mb TIFF?!
Best regards,
StaNi  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.171.92.12 (talk) 13:41, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Lady Kayura

message: I'm afraid I'm going to have to ask for a source on the statement that Kayura is twenty-one.  Most of the fandom, including myself, beleive her to be twelve.  I understand that information on this show is difficult to find at best, but since the article states "Sunrise officially stated that Kayura is 21 years old...", I would like to see something offical to this effect.
Thank you. Luthien Minyatur 05:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  12 vs 21
Talk:Rwanda national football team

message: Should be added Hamadi Ndikumana, who played as a starter in the last match vs. Maritania.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.97.102.214 (talk) 17:02, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update Roster 

message: team 2C0F:EB68:63A:A000:3D5B:BE28:C380:580C (talk) 06:13, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  heyy if these someone seeing this am asking for a team to play in or train bcz I'm a young baller with no team from Rwanda