Talk:Domingo Cavallo

message: I don't like this article. I've reverted an anon user's changes directly making Cavallo responsible for the economic crisis, but I still think it should be mentioned in some form, with proper sources. The article as it stands now pictures Cavallo as a "victim of circumstances", a poor fellow who simply couldn't persuade Menem to do the right thing because bad politics won over good economics, and couldn't work with De la Rúa because he was "weak" and things had gotten out of control already. There's also the matter of whether he sold information to some of his wealthiest "friends" regarding how to take money out of Argentina right before the corralito was in force. Comments are welcome.  --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 14:40, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't like this 

message: why do you think that?
i really enjoy what cavallo did, we don't like argentineans very much.
and thats what he did, its not my POV, you can call it a "Masterpiece" if you think it was, i don't care.
14 February 2006
:If you dislike the masterpiece thing why don't you change that? User:Ejrrjs  says What? 19:06, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  i'm not attacking Cavallo 

message: 2 times "convertivilidad" but omitting crucial information 
The end result of the fixed-exchange-rate scheme was disastrous / a masterpiece / successful / or whatever you want to call it (mr Ejrrjs / Pablito / Seba); it put pressure on the country's trade balance and the caused the decimation of the nation's industry. Recession followed, and with it, fiscal deficit.
When Menem's administration ended in 1999, it left a ruined country and a trail of grave corruption that has included the prosecution of Mr. Menem and Mr. Cavallo (Cavallo was freed after he spent two months in jail) for their alleged participation in the smuggling of arms to Croatia and Ecuador in spite of international embargoes to war zones. 
come and chat kids! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.83.142.148 (talk • contribs) .
:Remember that we are all trying to make an encyclopedia here, and the users you refer to have no mean intentions. It would be really good if you created a user for yourself, and sign your comments in the talk pages. I know you pretend to write the truth about Cavallo, but let's not get driven  by enthusiasm. We are not to make speculations on 'causes' but only state 'facts'. Of course, a quote of certain known political figure or economy specialist is more than welcome, always trying to show both sides of the history. Good wiking, Mariano(t/c) 18:38, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  you try to describe 

message: This article is far from the so called 'neutral point of view principle of Wikipedia'. Clearly written mainly be Cavallo opposers. I have deleted remarks that are not widely accepted. Please maintain the neutrality, otherwise none of this makes sense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.31.47.233 (talk • contribs) 
Mariano Grondona is one of Argentina's best known intellectuals and newspaper columnists, and one of very few who incorporates a psychohistorical perspective in his work.  His book Realidad: El Despertar del Sueño Argentino (Buenos Aires:  Planeta, 2002) is a psychologically sensitive account of Argentine political culture.
Domingo Cavallo, a brilliant and charismatic economist who had remarkable success as Carlos Menem's Economy Minister in the 1990s, is characterized by Grondona as exhibiting obsessive-compulsive and narcissistic personality traits. Cavallo is supremely self-confident, energetic and known for a hot temper, especially for an incident when he lashed out publicly at journalists who reported that he had lost an election. 
ill try. 67.83.142.148 06:46, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to leave the article without  any POV statements, both for nor against Cavallo. Mariano(t/c) 11:53, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests May 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:34, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Cavallo.ogv Nominated for Deletion