Talk:Bahram V

message: * A note about 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica entries on the Sassanid kings:  I have noticed that most of the entries view the wars between the Persians and Rome/Byzantine as if the root of the conflict was about Christianity or how the Christians were treated in Iran.  This is completely false.  The Christians in Iran for all practical purposes were a non-entity or non-issue at that time.  The conflicts with the Romans goes back to long before the advent of Christianity.  They were for a variety of reasons, but religion hardly palyed a role as a contributing factor for these conflicts. I will try to gradually correct the entries, but I can sure use some impartial helping hands here.  --Keyvan   15:41 Apr 11, 2003 (UTC)
: I concur completely. Should verso be changed to reverse? Its pretty archaic. Today I believe the numismatic terms are just obverse and reverse. Khirad 23:12, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Dana boomer (talk) 17:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: "The coins of Bahram V are chiefly remarkable for their crude and coarse workmanship and for the number of the mints from which they were issued." What is the source of this highly debatable remark? In my eyes, the silver drachms are no better but certainly not worse than those of his forefathers. 
Coins are easy to compare on one of the study websites, for instance Zeno or Rasmir. I don't see much difference in crudity there. 
And were there so many more mints in use than under other shahs? Then I'd expect a quantification, not a summing up of some places. Rasmir mentions 22 mints for Varhran V and 31 for his father, whereas Varhran's son Yazdegerd II has 16 known mints. So - please show us some sources. Glatisant (talk) 08:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There are currently no sources cited for that. I should have separated that body of text with the one that I added which is actually sourced, which I have done now . --HistoryofIran (talk) 10:54, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coinage