lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Scania-Vabis

message: This article's gallery is way too large, I think. Please choose about ten of the most significant cars Scania-Vabis built, and delete the rest. It will improve readability. Besides, there is a link to the commons-category Scania-Vabis on the page, for anyone interested to see more pictures. Mark in wiki (talk) 11:08, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Gallery too large
Talk:Hyundai Mighty

message: I appreciate that the same person must have written both of these articles, but they both contain the same sort of information! If you compare the Nissan Atlas article with this one structurally and in terms of the information in them they're almost exactly the same, and this must mean that a lot of the information is untrue! I think this article needs a complete rewrite with some more reliable sources. It's ridiculous, both articles have the same structure and information as each other! Chevymontecarlo (talk) 15:04, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Almost exactly the same as the Nissan Atlas article!
Talk:Showman's road locomotive

message: Never heard the term applied to anything other than a steam engine before today... (was added to road locomotive, since removed)
Googling this is very difficult, owing to the alternative uses of the phrase 'road locomotive' (particularly the US description of a type of railway locomotive). However, did find one link (http://www.rogertuby.co.uk/vehicles.htm) where the name is used as a very vague description to cover effectively any type of truck used for pulling fairground rides: not just short wheelbase converted artic tractor units, as described at ballast tractor, but also 8x4 box van -bodied things that probably started life as tipper lorries.
Have added a link in a hatnote, as this article is really intended to cover the original steam vehicles. Modern fairground transport deserves an article of its own. Combining them here is not a good idea.
EdJogg (talk) 13:25, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Showman's ''diesel'' road locomotive 

message: The main makers such as Burrell etc use Showmans as a type of engine - not Showman's as in belonging to showman. E.g. the title of the article is incorrect.Chenab (talk) 17:00, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be Showmans not Showman's 

message: While it's well done, it seems as if the original author didn't have a 100% grasp of the English language. 
He did quite well if this is the case, but it still needs a lookover. 74.10.226.163 (talk) 17:47, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review: Grammar & Typos 

message: The article says that the Supreme, the last of these machines ever built, was sold to Mrs. A. Deakin.  Is this Pattie (Mrs. Alfred) Deakin, wife of the second Prime Minister of Australia?  I have not created the link because she in fact lived in Australia, but for all I know she may have had a use for it. J S Ayer (talk) 18:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Margaret. In this case the the Alfred had died in 1927.©Geni (talk) 15:25, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mrs. A. Deakin? 

message: 900K in 2020:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-54735107
©Geni (talk) 15:30, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible source on how expensive these things have got
Talk:Steam crane

message: Several of the missing companies have articles availble under CC by sa at the  "Tractor & Construction Plant Wiki"
* Thomas Smith & Sons (Rodley) Ltd
* Coles Cranes
* Cowans Sheldon (stub)
As the main creator I'm not going to post them up as they need a copy edit to meet wps standards. But editors are free to use them to create the missing articles, or use the images. - BulldozerD11 (talk) 00:45, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing articles
Talk:Diplexer

message: This article is just wrong in so many ways. Diplexers are not splitters. They are not baluns. The power issue is lost. It has some good examples, but the technical details and the technical merits of diplexers are buried or lost.
Glrx (talk) 05:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: General comment

message: There is some confusion between duplexer and diplexer here. A duplexer is to provide duplex (two way) communication over a single path. A diplexer is to allow two signals to be carried over a single path - i.e. to provide two-channel multiplexing. Generally a diplexer consists of a pair of filters with non-overlapping pass-bands, so it implements frequency-division multiplexing. I agree that a device can be both a diplexer and duplexer - if it is a diplexer where the two signals travel in opposite directions (as in the diagram). However this does not mean that diplexer and duplexer are synonymous. A circulator is a duplexer but not a diplexer. A filter that splits or combines two signals occupying separate frequency bands is a diplexer but not a duplexer. --catslash (talk) 00:39, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Diplexer/duplexer
Talk:Chris Eaton (British musician)

message: I saw the request for sources on the Chris Eaton (UK musician) page under the Songs recorded by other artists section. Whether this is strictly correct or not I am not sure without looking up the specifics. I just don't really see why this is necessary when most of the songs listed are verified by a link to the album page where the song is identified as authored by Chris Eaton. The three songs that do not currently have a link, soon will (even if I have to do it myself) as they are from two major-label albums by a major artist. I'd say the references are more important on those linked pages. I don't know a single source for this information, so it would have to be a time-consuming separate reference for each album that is already linked anyway. AusChartMan (talk) 14:14, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  References for songs
Talk:Giannis Papaioannou

message: My impression is that this rebetika musician performed as Γιάννης Παπαιοάννου. I believe that this article should be titled Giannis Papaioannou to better reflect what he called himself - transliterating the greek letter gamma "Γ" to the Latin "Y". Skopelos-Slim (talk) 11:05, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting First Names 
Talk:DNS rebinding

message: TerraFrost, I noticed that you added links to articles about DNS pinning and Host header checking. I agree that there should be a mention of circumvention techniques, but I am concerned that these articles might be confusing to readers. The first article (circumventing DNS pinning) describes how to trick browsers into unpinning; this is not a flaw in pinning but rather an observation that current browsers do not fully implement pinning. A better example of a flaw in pinning is that browsers cannot enforce pinning when a proxy is being used. The second article (circumventing Host header checking) is a bit outdated, since it came several years before the Flash DNS rebinding fixes. Although it seems possible and even likely that attacks on Host header integrity may still exist, it would be best to link to a more up-to-date article on the issue, or perhaps provide some more context about when the article was written. Rulesdoc (talk) 06:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Circumventing DNS rebinding defenses
Talk:UMSL Tritons

message: This page is not accurate in most of the information that it lists for the athletic department at UMSL.
Please advise how to get this page changed or corrected.  I have tried to change before, but everything was thrown out for some reason.
Thanks for help.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.42.200.31 (talk) 05:29, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help
Talk:Pampero (multiple rocket launcher)

message: I've created this stub article as this MRL is one of the two in service with the Argentine Army (see more details in the WikiArticle on that army). I've done some quick online research prior to creating the stub (Dec'07).  This article has already been referenced in several artillery WikiLists (see section "See Also" in this article) and other related WikiArticles.  I was unable to find a free image of the gun, so just created a link to a future pic for when I find it.  Regards, DPdH (talk) 06:26, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article creation 

message: The image I've added is from an official Argentine Army website (that of the GA3, one of the units that use this MRL), hence I assume it's copyrighted (I've seen in other official sites that info & pics are copyright of the Army). I've provided a "Fair Use" rationale when uploaded the picture to Wikipedia, as I couldn't find free images in "Commons" or in the Internet. Can anybody please help with the adequate tagging of the image, so it is not deleted? Thanks, DPdH (talk) 03:25, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just noticed this image has been deleted, without being notified, even though a "fair use" rationale was provided. Can anyone please help me identify the reason why, and hoy to fix this so the image is not deleted again if I recover it? Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 15:20, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: I'm in doubt why this article is classified as Start and at the same time has been marked with a "mil-stub" tag. Can anyone help assess? IMHO, it qualifies as "Start".  Thanks & Regards, DPdH (talk) 04:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: For some unknown reason, this was still classified as "Stub"; so as per above I classified as "Start". Regards, DPdH (talk) 09:04, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality re-assessment 
Talk:Carnaval Brasileiro (Austin, Texas)

message: I received a message about deleting the page. something about a non-notable fair.  however, i'm not sure what that means.  if someone has some specific questions i can address them. 
I presumed it would be a good entry, since the festival is the largest indoor carnaval celebration in the world.
i am still learning, slowly, how this wikipedia thing works.  please be patient.
thanks.
----
People not from the Caribbean typically do not understand the significance of Carnival to Caribbean culture, and therefore dismiss its notability.  Many people think of kiddie carnivals with ferris wheels and rides, and have no understanding of what Caribbean Carnival or Brazilian Carnaval is. --WisTex (talk) 01:33, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  On Notability
Talk:Disappointment Island

message: Is there some sort of history why it's called Disappointment Island? --193.11.163.169 (talk) 11:09, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name history? 
Talk:OB

message: Lately, I've run across 'OB!' as a file extention from several different sources. They all seem to be .zip files. Anyone know anything about this? CFLeon (talk) 22:33, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: File Extention?

message: The phrases "OB may refer to" and "OB stands for" are both listed as acceptable in Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages). "Refers to" is broader and more inclusive of a variety of entries which may come and go on this page.  It includes acronyms, initialisms, and also actual name uses such as OB star and OB (cartoon) which may or may not "stand for" something.  No reasoning has yet been given for choosing the narrower verbage.  As to the wiktionary link, most of the wiktionary entries in the original box were pitiful and contained very little information, therefore I have chosen to de-clutter the box by including only the "OB" listing, which is, after all, the title of this page. SlackerMom (talk) 16:59, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introductory line and wiktionary link
Talk:Charles Biddle

message: Two of the three references shown are rotten links. The  template is needed. --DThomsen8 (talk) 16:07, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  More sources needed 

message: Biddle is a long-established American surname, with historic associations. The first one had been a Major in Cromwell's army, and emigrated to America after the restoration of Charles II. That branch became one of the first families of Philadelphia  -  as related in the memoirs of Sydney Biddle Barrows, who gained notoriety as New York's 'Mayflower Madam'. Was Charles Biddle any relation? Valetude (talk) 00:12, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sydney Biddle Barrows, Mayflower Madam? 
Talk:Big Elk

message: The tags on the article (unreferenced) say that he was born in 1765, but Find-A-Grave (which is not a Reliable Source) claims 1770. Uncertainty? --Alvestrand (talk) 17:51, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doubtful year of birth? 
Talk:Charles Blahous

message: I searched Science magazine and found nothing there. I was surprised because he was a Congressional Science Fellow and Science usually covers people like that. I'd like to see a bit more about his science background in the story. --Nbauman (talk) 16:33, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing in Science 
Talk:Henry English Read

message: This is my ggggg uncle who fought in the Mexican War at the young age of 14 years old.  He was left to die.  Suffered multiple wounds and was in the hospital for months.  He walked back to Kentucky the entire way.  He served as a spy.  Upon his return the governor of KY handed him a special sword with his name on it and an award.  It is now in the Fison Museum in Louisville, KY.
When the Civil War Broke out, he again was called to duty.  First as Lieutenant and then General.  He as a boy was a blacksmith, a mechanic, and before and after the civil war became a Lawyer. He served in the First and Second Confederate Congress.  He was pardoned by Lincoln for not fighting for the North. He ended up committing suicide in Louisville, KY in his law office.  His note simply said he had served honorably for years for his great state of Kentucky but could go on no more.  He left a wife and several small children behind.
He has a monument in Elizabethtown, KY  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.49.158.155 (talk) 05:07, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Henry English Read
Talk:Bill Brittingham

message: Brittingham has in recent decades been unfairly blamed for Essendon's inaccuracy (7.27) in the 1948 drawn Grand Final. Contemporary press reports list him as kicking 2.3, not the 2.12 quoted later. See The Age back page of Monday 4 October 1948 https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=UtFVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=6LwDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6795%2C1657742
RossRSmith (talk) 04:15, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Myth about 1948 Grand Final 
Talk:Romana Acosta Bañuelos

message: This article will need a major re-write.  It doesn't just "incoporate" text from the DOS site, it's cut and pasted, word for word.The Original Historygeek (talk) 04:51, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Department of State website would ostensibly be a PD-USGOV website, so apart from style issues, we wouldn't have any problems with using their text. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 09:25, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: True enough.  Anyway, I am working on the style-issues.The Original Historygeek (talk) 08:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Thomas J. Scully

message: The article was originally at Thomas J. Scully. User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) moved it it Thomas Joseph Scully. User:Yaksar disagreed and moved it back. Then User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) moved it again, saying he disagreed with User:Yaksar. The presence of disagreement by this stage is obvious, and the proper course of action should be equally obvious. The onus is on the party wishing to move the article from its original name to propose the move via WP:RM. The party wishing to make this move is User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ). Please use WP:RM for any future move requests to this article. Good Ol’factory (talk) 08:58, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: How come doesn't abide by the same rule he demands in others. He moves Andrew F. McBride to Andrew McBride (politician). He then moves Andrew McBride (politician) to Andrew F. McBride (politician) and then finally moved Andrew F. McBride (politician) to Andrew F. McBride. All the moves were outside of WP:RM. He demands the use of WP:RM by others, but does not appear to be using it himself. he rationalizes it by saying my moves are controversial, but his moves are identical to mine, finding the best name per WP:Common as used in the most reliable sources such as the Congressional directory. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 20:37, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: But RAN, the net result of these moves was that I didn't move the page at all! It started at Andrew F. McBride and it ended up at Andrew F. McBride! Can't you see that I probably realized mid-way that the name was somewhat problematic and controversial, so I restored the status quo ante? Good Ol’factory (talk) 21:12, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: If you demand others use WP:RM and enforce that rule with a block, you should be using WP:RM for your moves. It is analogous to the cop that gives out speeding tickets who speeds himself or the minister who preaches abstinence whoring around. Practice what you preach if you want people to take you seriously. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 08:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I do use WP:RM for controversial moves I propose. I'm not sure if you didn't understand the process you referred to above, but when I realized the name would be controversial, I restored the status quo ante. In other words, no change was made. WP:RM does not need to be used for non-controversial name changes. Unfortunately, you have showed yourself unwilling or unable to recognize the difference between the two. When someone reverses the move you make, that's a good sign it is controversial. But here, when someone moved it back, you attempted to move it again without any discussion. Good Ol’factory (talk) 20:51, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name changes
Talk:Seymour Stedman

message: In the off chance that a relative of Seymour Stedman finds this page, please do not hesitate to get in touch if you have additional information, family photos, etc. that might be put into the public domain. Thanks!  — Tim Davenport, Early American Marxism website, Corvallis, OR. MutantPop@aol.com Carrite (talk) 20:18, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Note to relatives
Talk:Tahesha Way

message: Photo already exists in article; request removed. Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 07:25, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for photo
Talk:Actinomycetales

message: Merging the suborders with the families is wrong. I am going to correct it. Suborders end in -ineae and families end in -aceae. --Kupirijo (talk) 07:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Suborders/Families
Talk:Process-oriented coma work

message: This is an amazing article, entirely relevant to anyone who has a loved one in a coma. I'm not sure how to categorize it, but might put it somewhere between philosophy and medicine. Even if the person has a Living Will, this "process-work" is important. 
My Dad had a major stroke a few weeks ago. Just yesterday his docs and family decided to put him on "comfort care" which includes agreeing to remove his feeding tube. Tonight he looked at me directly in the eye, grabbed my hand, pulled it to his lips, and kissed it with an audible "smack." He then smiled brilliantly while maintaining eye contact with me. I've never cried harder in my life.
Knowmoore (talk)
This is anecdotal. Process work is largely unrecognised outside of Arnold Mindell's own unaccredited Process Work Centre. In my opinion this page is just advertising for the Mindell organisation, it does not meet NPOV and is not noteable. 
Lierooreil (talk) 18:47, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Non-free media rationale

message: The rationale used in :Image:Nick Cave & the Bad Seeds - Dig, Lazarus, Dig!!! coverart.JPG breaks the header of this template because of a link to Dig, Lazarus, Dig!!! ˉˉanetode╦╩ 08:06, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting, it is fine with one exclamation point but does not like two or three. The parent of this template, , does it too; I will look into the issue. In the meantime, the backlink category is being implemented properly, so it seems like a cosmetic issue that isn't hurting anyone for the moment. — TAnthonyTalk 05:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bug 

message: I've noticed what may be a slight issue with this template. When completing the form, the field asks for "Replaceability", to which the correct or logical answer would be "None" , as in "The amount of replaceability that this image has is None". However, when the template appears on the image page, it reads as "Replaceable?", for which the correct answer would be "No", as in "No, this image is not replaceable". It's a minor thing, but could we rename the text that the template shows to read as "Replaceability", so that it matches the other fields (i.e. no question mark)? I can make the change, but wanted to get feedback before doing so. Thanks! UltraExactZZ  Claims ~ Evidence  14:09, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This template was created from , which has been much-debated and tweaked. I'm not sure why the parameter is set up that way, but I would open up this question to the group of editors there and see what you get.  I have a feeling there is a very specific reason it is the way it is. And by the way, it's not supposed to be a one-word answer, you're supposed to explain why it's not replaceable, like "Copyrighted TV series and characters, no free images exist." — TAnthonyTalk 17:13, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Replacement?

message: This template and the accompanying  have "image" in their names but produce the message "Non-free media use rationale" and "Non-free media use data" respectively. Consistency in title and output would help make using them less confusing. I'm going to copy this comment to that template's talk page so it gets seen, please comment there. — Hex (❝?!❞) 08:10, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name versus output
Talk:Betsey Bayless

message: More information please. Date of Birth, etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.58.152.238 (talk) 17:30, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information Wanted 
Talk:Richard Mahoney

message: Is this sentence, moved from article to talk, relevant enough to move back? (I moved the year of birth from the end of this sentence to the intro) RJFJR (talk) 16:42, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Relevant?

message: *http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=YmoxAAAAIBAJ&sjid=uQgEAAAAIBAJ&pg=4367%2C6955761
*http://www.publishersweekly.com/978-1-55970-480-9
- Location (talk) 16:54, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: For future reference
Talk:H. A. Boucher

message: Boucher achieved the top enlisted rank of Chief Petty Officer.
:Category:American military personnel who served in the Pacific theatre of World War II
Replaced 
Category:United States Navy officers - This category is for articles on people who are or have been officers between the ranks of warrant officer and captain in the United States Navy.
There is not a Chief Petty Officer category yet.  JeffFive (talk) 19:58, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

message: Out - Ref please - His mother was one of the first female chief petty officers in the United States Navy. ? I know this has been up for years. But, it needs a source.  JeffFive (talk) 12:39, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit 
Talk:Mark Brzezinski

message: Is there a better photo for the article? The current one shows the guy costumed in a top hat like some Downton Abbey cosplayer, and does not seem representative of a US diplomat. We might get laughed at. -- 173.150.219.127 (talk) 14:36, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Talk:Tipsy Nipper

message: T.66 Tipsy Nipper is not right; it is not a USAF trainer.  Not sure if it should be Tipsy T.66 Nipper or Tipsy Nipper T.66 (CAA use latter), or indeed if the T.66 is really a Tipsy number or a Slingsby one, only applicable to the MkIII (or 3).  Nipper is the aircraft's name, not its nickname.  Also Tips may well have referred to his grandchild as the nipper, but that is a common, friendly word for any small child, as well as for anyone one or thing that is quick or nippy, so I'm not sure it's relevant.TSRL (talk) 23:38, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  header name 

message: We say developed 1952 but first flown 1957.  Is the first right?TSRL (talk) 00:05, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  dates