lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:39th Infantry Regiment (War of 1812)

message: Please don't move this! This unit's importance has been almost completely forgotten. Vern Reisenleiter, who most adequately wrote the original article, passed away in 2006. I'm the g-g-g grandson of the commander, Col. John Williams. Please see my comments about the merge or write me if you have any doubt whatsoever that this unit should have it's own page. (Afb37206 (talk) 14:31, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Vern Reisenleiter 21:09, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

text: Vern Reisenleiter 21:39, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

text: Vern Reisenleiter 02:35, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Please move
Talk:History of North Ossetia–Alania

message: The following passage was removed by an anonymous editor, who labeled it as "non-relative information":
:Historically, the part of the Prigorodny District on the right bank of the Terek River had been part of Ingushetia, but it was granted to North Ossetia in 1944, following Stalin's deportation of the Ingush to Central Asia. Although they were eventually allowed to return to their homes, the territory itself was never returned to Ingushetia, causing considerable tension in the region. A local law passed in 1982 actually prohibited ethnic Ingush from obtaining residency permits in the republic. The massive influx of South Ossetian refugees in the early 1990s and the ensuing conflict between the two rival groups eventually caused many Ingush to flee to Ingushetia. While efforts are underway to settle the refugee problem, the conflict between the two republics has yet to be resolved.
As the passage describes the events that actually happened, and as the events are pertinent to the subject of the article (History of North Ossetia-Alania), it cannot be removed.  If an NPOV violation is suspected in the way the facts are worded and/or presented, it is recommended that the anonymous contributor and other parties interested in the subject label the article as an NPOV violation, explain the nature of the violation on this talk page, and edit the passage in such a manner as to produce a compromise solution.  A simple removal of the passage will be viewed as vandalism, and dealt with accordingly.—Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 21:16, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
2Mikkalai & Ezhiki
Don't revert to non-truthful information.
:Please explain what is untrue. Deletion of text without explanation disallowed. mikka (t) 16:40, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputes

message: please see . --KoberTalk 04:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dispute tag
Talk:List of science fiction comedy films

message: What about Tremors (1990)? Maybe too much monster, not enough science?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:600:8180:4460:C1D2:8007:D94C:1C75 (talk) 01:52, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page should be in Chronological order. You can search for a name much easier than you can search for a date. Fresheneesz 22:34, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chronological order

message: Should this article be named either "List of comedic science-fiction films" or "List of comedy science-fiction films"? The word "comic" has a couple of meaning that may differ from what is intended here. Regards, RJH (talk) 15:02, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comic or Comedic?
Talk:Mariehamn

message: "Its name in Finnish — as sometimes given on maps and in other Finnish-language documents — is Maarianhamina."
This sentence should be removed. The population of Åland and Mariehamn don't wanna risk that somebody might believe it is an official name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.204.59.72 (talk) 21:30, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Err, but it is its official Finnish name! --TonyM ｷﾀ━( °∀° )━ｯ!! 11:26, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Mariehamn is unilingually Swedish-speaking and around 89.5% of the inhabitants speak it as their native language."
How can the place be defined unilingual when only 9/10 speak the majority language natively? Either the non-Swede's have stopped speaking their mother tongues, or there is something funny going on with the definition of unilingual.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.220.141.180 (talk) 18:03, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's likely that this IP has found an answer in the past five years, but just so there's one here: in Finland a "unilingual" municipality is one that only has one official language. A municipality may be declared unilingual if the language minority is below a certain percentage. More on this, and a map of uni- and bilingual municipalities, at Languages of Finland. 85.226.204.42 (talk) 13:22, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Unilingually

message: The building with the caption "St.George's Church" seems to be leaning at an odd angle. Admittedly, I am not interested in the denomination involved.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.112.11.135 (talk) 10:52, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaning 
Talk:Lidingö Municipality

message: They are the RICH SIDE OF TOWN! :-)
==Lidingö Stad==
Lidingö calles themselves stad not kommun. Shouldnt muncipality be repleced by town? --Dahlis 02:35, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: X Municipality is apparently the way it is expressed by the government. There's some discussion on Talk:Municipalities of Sweden and see also Wikipedia:Swedish Wikipedians' notice board/Terminology. // Fred-Chess 02:43, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  The facts are: In Sweden there is since the municipal reform in 1971 only one type of municipality, called in Swedish "kommun". Most municipalities contain rural as well as urban areas, and there is no administrative difference whatsoever between "town" and "country".Some municipalities, which derive from former chartered towns or cities, dislike this order. Therefore they prefer to call themselves "stad" (city). This is not really illegal, but it is unofficial. At present there are 13 out of 290 municiplities, which call themselves "stad". But in official contexts the proper term for all municipalities is kommun. --Andhanq 18:50, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rich part of Stockholm

message: Lidingö calles themselves stad not kommun. Shouldnt muncipality be repleced by town? --Dahlis 02:35, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: X Municipality is apparently the way it is expressed by the government. There's some discussion on Talk:Municipalities of Sweden and see also Wikipedia:Swedish Wikipedians' notice board/Terminology. // Fred-Chess 02:43, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  The facts are: In Sweden there is since the municipal reform in 1971 only one type of municipality, called in Swedish "kommun". Most municipalities contain rural as well as urban areas, and there is no administrative difference whatsoever between "town" and "country".Some municipalities, which derive from former chartered towns or cities, dislike this order. Therefore they prefer to call themselves "stad" (city). This is not really illegal, but it is unofficial. At present there are 13 out of 290 municiplities, which call themselves "stad". But in official contexts the proper term for all municipalities is kommun. --Andhanq 18:50, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lidingö Stad

message: We looked for a free photo (commons like license) from the "Raoul Wallenberg Monument marks achievements, created by artist Willy Gordon". Who can help? Thanks -- Godewind 12:58, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need a photo
Category talk:Filipino Wikipedians

message: Someone wrote that this page is reserved for good-looking people, I edited that out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZoneSeek (talk • contribs) 21:33, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Tayo ay mga Pilipino, kaya gamitin ang sariling wika!!!
Kaya nga sabi: Filipino Wikipedians... ikarangal natin na may mga Pilipino sa Wikipedia!!!
-Pika ten10 (talk) 09:41, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Managalog po tayo 

message: it might be best if we try to talk in the English language in conversing, the reality is that we want, the entire world to know more about our culture, our people and so on and so forth. the use of the Filipino language would be suitable for the wikipedia Filipino edition. --ParthianPrince (talk) 10:13, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  adding our personal touch in world culture
Talk:Anthony Joseph Drexel

message: The text is "wrapped" around the small square Table of Context box in order to avoid ugly gaping holes of blank space. Try alternatives yourself and see the effect . There is currently an editor going about making a mess of carefully formatted articles to satisfy some obscure personal agenda. --Wetman 21:33, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not obscure or personal, it was the overwhelming feeling of the VfD discussion for this template.  The whitespace generated by a four item Table of Contents is is no way a problem for the layout of any article, let alone this one.  There is a reason for the default TOC being as it is, if most people found it ugly it certainly wouldn't be the default.  There is no way TOCright or TOCleft are justified for a four item TOC.  Saying "every sensible adult" would support its use on these pages is certainly not the case, most sensible adults were and are against its use except as a last resort for long TOCs, and the majority of sensible adults continue using the default TOC in their articles.  If you wish to go on abusing this template by using it where it is not remotely neccesary, you may be turning those who voted to keep it as a last resort off it altogether.  Joe D (t) 21:33, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Formatting

message: The infobox says Drexel died in Philadelphia. The main article says he died in Europe. Which is it? Fishyfred (talk) 08:02, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Place of death

message: This article is very incomplete and unfinished.  It has some info. on his early life and impact but nearly nothing on the latter part of his life, along with the incongruity mentioned above regarding his place of death... Stevenmitchell (talk) 23:52, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This Article is Very Incomplete
Wikipedia talk:Negotiation

message: Viewed inappropriately as game theory, negotiation is about winning or losing.
Wikipedia features direct links to web pages that cover the assigned subject. My Web page http://www.fsteiger.com/Pyramid.html is listed on the first Google page under "Egyptian pyramid ramps." It is also listed on the third Google page under "Egyptian pyramid construction."  Yet Wikipedia refuses to list my web page and deletes any links to my web page. The information in my web page provides information regarding pyramid construction that is not available from any other source. It is NOT spam. I really do not understand why Wikipedia refuses to objectively evaluate the information in my web page. Fsteiger 17:57, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: cut

message: Kindly, consider this for better understanding of the process.103.196.228.191 (talk) 16:17, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_Parenthood_2015_undercover_videos_controversy#/talk/8#/talk/8
I'd love some comments on this. Maybe I misunderstand the Wikipedia policies, but at least some of the content seems relevant. natemup (talk) 16:46, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC on content concerning illegal fetal tissue dealers
Talk:Ogilvie Transportation Center

message: North Western Station was substantially altered in the mid 1980s, but was renamed Ogilvie in the mid 1990s.  Therefore, what was now Ogilvie was then Northwestern.  Should not then North Western Station redirect here? Gws57 21:43, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
Most Chicagoans still refer to the station as North Western Station (in fact, even the CTA's buses that terminate at the station list it as "NW Station" on their display boards.  North Western Station really has much more of a history than Ogilvie Transportation Center. --Boreas231 16:06, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The question was about having a separate article at North Western Station, which now redirects here. --SPUI (talk) 19:39, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: By the most common name rule, this should redirect there instead of as it is now. --Dhartung | Talk 16:06, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: North Western Station not needed?

message: designed by Frost and Granger, built for C&NW, opened 1911, largest in city at the time but dwarfed by 1925 Union Station, 3-story waiting room reached by grand staircase, tracks on second floor --SPUI (talk) 03:59, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Info from ''A Guide to Chicago's Train Stations Present and Past'' by Ira J. Bach and Susan Wolfson

message: buses that terminate at the station list it as "NW Station" on their display boards. North Western Station really has much more of a history than Ogilvie Transportation Center. --Boreas231 16:06, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: NW Station

message: Was this staircase and lobby a former part of Ogilvie, or was it from a different C&NW Station in Chicago? ----DanTD (talk) 13:47, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old image question 

message: Just a quick query: why were we using  as the pronunciation guide before my edit? I speak with a Midwestern, Chicago-style accent, and everyone I know (not to mention myself) pronounces it as  with that nice little schwa. Am I missing something or should we leave it at that? --BrutusTheQuilt (talk) 2:00, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation? 

message: The table of former services lists B&O. The furthest east terminal point is given as Jersey City. However, the B&O terminated its passenger services northeast of Baltimore to Jersey City in 1958.Dogru144 (talk) 04:48, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. Cards84664 20:36, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Table of former services B&O error
Talk:TD Canada Trust

message: I've done a minor rewrite, and tried to make the article a bit more neutral. I also removed the 'treats them like family' sentence, as it is extremely subjective, unverifiable, and not of encyclopedic quality. The rewrite also includes some clean up, including the removal of a random sentence from the references, and the addition of a reference for the 'best employers' award. I think I've done what I wanted to achieve, but it is definitely still a stub. Anyone up for the challenge of filling it out? --Dbo789 (talk) 06:57, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I should add, I tried to find a reference for the number of clients stated in the first sentance. Unfortunately all I could find is the number of branches and ATMs. Anyone mind tracking down a ref? --Dbo789 (talk) 07:00, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

text: I've added an infobox with the correct logo and some updated information. --Dbo789 (talk) 02:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite & Cleanup 

message: I've updated the images in the article. The branch image better shows the division's operations than the tower image, and the old image of the cards is extremely out-of-date. It has been ten years since the TD/Canada Trust merger. Furthermore, TDCT cards do no longer look like the one in the image since the implementation of chip technology in Canada.
--75.159.149.127 (talk) 03:18, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image Changes 

message: The logo has to be updated, as TD has removed "Canada Trust" from its retail logo online, in advertisements, and on stationary.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.238.82.175 (talk) 22:09, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated logo.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scott87 (talk • contribs) 22:18, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: New logo

message: I added TD diverse languages service on the page.Karyfhk (talk) 02:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: TD services
Talk:Bar (landform)

message: The text is "wrapped" around the small square Table of Context box in order to avoid ugly gaping holes of blank space. Try alternatives yourself and see the effect. "TOCleft" is preferably, unless there are reasons for setting it at the right. There is currently an editor going about making a mess of carefully formatted articles to satisfy some obscure personal agenda. --Wetman 21:57, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You are now being dishonest.  This has been responded to several times.  Since you continue to ignore the response and wishes of several other editors and add the template I consider this vandalism.  Joe D (t) 22:00, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: First, I do not see a problem.  Setting the TOC so text wraps around it seems like an improvement to me? And what other editors responses and wishes? Just because you want a lot of blank space on the page does not make efforts to improve the article "vandalism" by anyone's definition. State your problem with the edit. "Not needed" and "How dare you reverse one of my edits" are not helpful responses - Marshman 18:00, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Formatting

message: I propose this article be renamed shoal.  This word is at least as common as "bar" and results in elimination of the ugly parenthesis.
The present shoal page would become Shoal (disambiguation).  Cuvette 04:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal for name change
Talk:Gamla stan

message: The photo with the caption "Panorama from City Hall" and file name "Old_Town_from_Stockholm_City_Hall.png" actually depicts Kungsholmen and not Gamla Stan.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.55.75.2 (talk) 09:24, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right (as evidenced by this list), thanks for noticing! I'm removing the statement. / Alarm 22:27, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

message: : "The surrounding islets: Riddarholmen, Helgeandsholmen, and Strömsborg are technically not included in Gamla stan."
Not? Indeed they are, IMO. As should be apparent from the "Origin of the name" section (which I created) these islets are "technically" (whatever this means) included in the official name.  Even though we are using different editions of the same source, I'm sure "Gatunamn" do not confirm the statement above in any edition.
 / Mats Halldin (talk) 23:08, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extent 
Talk:Cognitive architecture

message: This opening sentence is confusing because the word "them" doesn't seem to reference anything: "Common to cognitive architecture is the belief that understanding (human) cognitive processing means being able to implement them on a computational level."
:comment made by User:206.80.243.32. 
:"Them" refers to "cognitive processing". If you find a better wording change it. --Ben  T/C  18:34, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Them 

message: These are the external links that were on the page. It's getting kind of spammy... we could stand to turn some of these into references and have a real, inline-referenced article.
*  a review of cognitive architectures, by Duch W, Oentaryo R.J, Pasquier M, 2008
*  a comprehensive set of pointers to cognitive architectures and related issues
* categorized publications about ACT-R
*   categorized publications about CHREST
*   categorized publications about CLARION
* categorized publications about Soar
* A Survey of Cognitive and Agent Architectures
* GAIuS General Artificial Intelligence using Software at SourceForge
* Intelligent Artifacts provides blackbox AI solutions based on GAIuS.
* Architecture-Based Conceptions of Mind by Aaron Sloman, in: P. Gardenfors and K. Kijania-Placek and J. Wolenski, Eds., In the Scope of Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science (Vol II), (Synthese Library Vol. 316), Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 403–427, 2002. (The ideas are summarised in this PDF presentation on Architectures for Human-like Agents.)
* Teach Rose: an artificial cognitive learning experiment
* Cognitive architectures: Research issues and challenges by Langley, P., Laird, J. E., & Rogers, S. (2009)
* Reactive reasoning and planning by Georgeff, M. P. and Lansky, A. L. (1987). In Proceedings of the Sixth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-87), pages 677-682, Seattle, WA.
* UK Computing Research Grand Challenge 5 (GC-5) 'Architecture of brain and mind.'
* A Framework for comparing agent architectures, Aaron Sloman and Matthias Scheutz, in Proceedings of the UK Workshop on Computational Intelligence, Birmingham, UK, September 2002.
* An Intelligent Architecture for Integrated Control and Asset Management for Industrial Processes Taylor, J.H.   Sayda, A.F. in Intelligent Control, 2005. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Symposium on, Mediterrean Conference on Control and Automation. pp 1397–1404
* The SOUL Cognitive Architecture website
* cogarch.org Cognitive Architecture Wiki
Disavian (talk) 21:52, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: External links removed

message: What is the relationship between multi-agent systems and cognitive architectures? Are multi-agent systems an example of a cognitive architecture, or vice versa? Or is there just an overlap?  What distinguishes them? ---- CharlesGillingham (talk) 03:12, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship to [[multi-agent system]]
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Gwinett County Public Schools

message: I don't think my participation in this discussion has been productive, so I'm withdrawing.  I have removed the following comments.
Comment. The statement that this school district is in some way "not notable" is not sustainable in my opinion. There are 106 schools in this district, at least eighteen of which are high schools, and the district was responsible for approximately 142,000 K12 students in 2005/6. --User:Tony Sidaway/User talk:Tony Sidaway 16:23, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Withdrawing from discussion
Talk:HaMoked

message: I don't think that there is an official "broken bones" policy of the Israeli military.     To reduce POV, I added the word "alleged" to the sentence  "... Palestinian victims of the Israeli military's broken bones policy that was used in response to the first First Intifada."    I realize that this is not an ideal solution. -- Austrian 22:36, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: broken bones
Talk:Benjamin Rosenbaum

message: The science fiction writer was clearly not born in 1855; he would be 150 years old (assuming still live today, and he recently published a book), but the oldest man ever is only 120.  Perhaps the violinist is a different person?  --Erik Demaine 22:39, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The violinist never existed, I made him up before I joined. Despite that a few of the compositions I invented related to titles of actual Rosenbaum stories like Droplet. Anyway back then I was occasionally silly when I wrote here.--T. Anthony 07:25, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Munchkin Country

message: I think this page should be moved to Munchkin Country, since this is the most often used in the "Famous Forty". --— —JonMoore 20:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I dont remember original novel but in  Wicked: The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West, this land lays on east. The map that it attached to the article, shows those lands on West.
--89.71.65.202 (talk) 17:08, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  East or West