Talk:Chevrolet Lumina

message: HAs there been any official comment on the wheel cover problem?  It's rare to see a Lumina with all four wheel covers.  Even replacements tend to fall off after a while.  PrometheusX303 13:58, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what year model, but they are always the first generation. There are quite a few around town.  Most of them are missing at least one wheel cover.  Those that aren't have replacement sets. PrometheusX303 00:47, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: LTZ is a luxury trim for most Chevrolets today.  The LTZ was the high-end Lumina introduced in 1997, but did it replace the Caprice? -- Bull-Doser 01:51, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lumina LTZ?

message: How many names one car have? It's hard to understand since I'm in China, quite far away to USA.
http://www.chevrolet.co.za/content_data/LAAM/ZA/en/GBPZA/001/models/1F/gallery.html
* The car you are talking of is a Holden Commodore which is sold as Chevrolet Lumina in South Africa and in the Middle East. Badge engineering can be rather confusing. OnkelFordTaunus (talk) 17:52, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need To ad UTE 

message: The 2nd generation Lumina is over 200 inches long, so I think it should be classified as a full-size car. The 1st generation Lumina is close to 200 inches too, but I'm okay with it being classified as mid-size or full-size. I just want to make sure that other people agree that the 95-01 Lumina is full-size before I make any changes. —Reelcheeper (talk) 19:19, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely not. The car was never designed or marketed as a full-size and there is no way it could be construed as such with its size and market position. --Sable232 (talk) 16:25, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, thanks. Even though I still consider Luminas to be full-size, I will not make any changes since they technically are mid-size. —Reelcheeper (talk) 21:14, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Full-size car?

message: VX1NG (talk) 17:08, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged Z34 article back into this article 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Oppose. The hatnote seems to deal with the other versions. Is there doubt that this is the primary topic? There may be, but the rationale doesn't raise any. The proposed disambiguator is esoteric, and probably unnecessary. Andrewa (talk) 23:00, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I just wanted to apologize for moving the article; I should have checked the talk page to see the discussion first. I posted the request to Wikipedia:Requested_moves/Technical_requests#Technical_requests so hopefully, my move will be reverted soon. Sorry for inconvenience.VX1NG (talk) 12:44, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accidental Move 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chevrolet Lumina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160202212622/http://www.thenewautos.net/new-chevrolet-lumina/ to http://www.thenewautos.net/new-chevrolet-lumina/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified