lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Coalition of Essential Schools

message: Do we need an incomplete list of Coalition schools in this article? If it's incomplete, where's the value or criteria for selection?, If it were complete, it would be huge and also of uncertain value. If it's worth having, maybe offload to a separate List of Coalition of Essential Schools institutions and try to get it more complete--is there an authoritative list on CES website? Or maybe even more sane to have just a :Category:Coalition of Essential Schools institutions so they can all get tagged (again, uncertain worth of huge list)? either way, could subdivide by location (either a sortable table with state-names or subcats? DMacks (talk) 01:01, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of schools 
Talk:David Boren

message: who keeps adding crap to this page?  i just went through an extensive clean-up.  please stop adding specious material. Waltersobchak 04:54, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Someone recently mentioned to me that Ross Perot wanted this man as his running mate when he ran for president, but he declined. If this is true, it should be mentioned in the article somewhere. Andre (talk) 07:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perot? 
Talk:Emotionalism

message: This article doesn't need a simple cleanup, it needs a complete rewrite. There is not a single source given, the grammar and orthography are simply abysmal and the sarcastic and judgemental undertone is annoying as hell - and certainly does not contribute in the least to the few facts that actually might be there. If there is a single word that can not be considered original research in this article, I couldn't find it. If there is anyone ready to waste his time replacing this mess certainly everyone here would be very grateful. --TheOtherStephan 11:11, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, in regards to what this article consisted of before it was shortened to a single paragraph, it certainly was one of the most overtly biased and opinionated articles I have come across on this website, period. Perhaps this concept should simply be discussed on Wiktionary, as it really doesn't seem like something that ought to have an entire encyclopedic article devoted to it, a consise dictionary defintion would likely work better. Overall, this concept seems rather similar to Romanticism, perhaps it should redirect to that, although their may be subtle differences that I missed. 66.24.236.62 23:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On a side note, I would highly suggest that the author of this article read "Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain" by Antonio R. Damasio. (Although somewhat unrelated, I personally find it rather amusing that said editor seemed to exhibit a rather angry tone in his typing despite the entire point he was trying to defend, poorly, was the supposed irrationality inherent to emoting.) 66.24.236.62 23:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: This article, given its format, really seems like it would work better in Wiktionary.66.24.231.57 22:37, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiktionary 

message: this artcile did not have alot to it. i would suggest maybe adding some examples of emotionalism and ways that is was or could be studied.--Saraheliz 19 (talk) 17:09, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psychology 101 

message: There's this wierd sentence: "A figure often associated with emotionalism is Adolf Hitler, for he often used emotionalism to entice his followers. He would appeal to his audience's emotions while speaking, which led to massive encouragement from the Germans in whatever he wanted to do." I'd suggest this needs a reference,or to be removed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.215.5.255 (talk) 17:46, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hitler
Talk:Polkacide

message: Along with the recent assertions of non-non-notability made by PJM, let me add one more: Polkacide was featured on a segment of NPR's All Things Considered (link here).
To be honest, it does piss me off a bit, because those who absolutely leapt to move to delete this article could have done the same research (I provided the link to the band's website, which contains this link). I believe this overzealous requesting deletion is actually against the general sense of Wikipedia's rules, if not the letter. It was literally within less than 5 minutes after I created this article that the rfd "tag" appeared on it. No mention on any talk pages. I mean, whoa: back off, call off your dogs, OK? --ILike2BeAnonymous 16:42, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI, you probably should have included the NPR link to begin with. The tagging for deletion is really no big deal because you get five days worth of discussion and enough eyes will look at it that people can fix it (as is what seems to have happened). Note also however that as you originally wrote it, the article fell under the scope of the rules as specified in Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, specifically item 7 under "Articles." There was no assertion of importance/significance and you provided no references. Considering WP gets hundreds of new articles per day (a lot of which is junk) you can't blame the people who patrol these pages for thinking this article doesn't deserve to stay, especially when you compare it to the stuff that does get deleted. I don't mean to shift the blame on you; after all, you're relatively new and can't be expected to know all the ins and outs of WP. I suggest you try doing some new page patrol for a little while just to see it from their perspective. Regards, howcheng  {chat} 17:43, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Please don't nuke me!

message: Reads much like an advertisement. Tried changing it to be less ad-y, and hope it stays that way. Quantupediholic (talk) 12:48, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag (April 2021) 

message: Seems sus. Quantupediholic (talk) 13:22, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag (April 2021)
Talk:Type 98 20 mm AAG tank

message: Would appreciate references for this page. Because there is lots of confusion about this particular tank's existence, armaments, and structure. Was it ever deployed after March 1944? WinterSpw (talk) 18:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I added what sources I could find and did some ce and re-write accordingly. Frankly, the Type 98 Ta-Se single gun version came out first and I don't know why this second prototype version was given a titled separate article. Both were only prototypes and never went into general production. With that said, they do deserve a separate page from the "half-track" version discussed above. Kierzek (talk) 04:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need references to source information on this page
Talk:Nathan Clifford

message: In the process of updating the List of Presidents of the Maine Senate and the Template of Senate Presidents, I found that a link on the template linked to this article, but the Senate President Clifford was the grandson of this Clifford.   As such, I've created a disambiguation link so an article for Senate President Clifford can be created. 331dot (talk) 20:02, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clifford's son 

message: Paragraphs appear to have been directly lifted from multiple sources and inserted without quotation or attribution.Fairman, Charles. History of the Supreme Court of the United States. Vol. VI. New York: Macmillan Company, 1971. 698–700.Gillette, William. The Justices of the United States Supreme Court, 1789-1969, Their Lives and Major Opinions. Edited by Leon Friedman and Fred L. Israel. Vol. II. New York: Chelsea House in Association with Bowker, 1969. 968–972.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Corkindale (talk • contribs) 03:13, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I just finished checking every citation to Fairman Vol. VI against a copy from my local library and found no evidence of copying or close paraphrase. I don't have ready access to Gillette's work, but given my findings regarding the other half of the sources mentioned here I'm removing  tag for now. If anyone sees something I've overlooked, please restore the tag and let an admin know what you see. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible copyright violations
Talk:Functionalism (international relations)

message: Does someone with more editing experience than I have want to clean up the citations/footnotes on this page?  Seems like we're switching between several styles here.03:49, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  In-text citations 

message: Tjss, why did you delete a number of sourced sections of the article?  That certainly extends beyond mere "clean up" as you put in your edit summary. —thames 16:45, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Might as well revert. Ksenon 05:04, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tjss 

message: Would you move it under the umbrella of Idealism...In my view, you can relate functionalism more with the various liberal theories than with the marxist or realist family. I find it odd to find Functionalism as a family on it's own! Bhork (talk) 17:33, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different section for functionalism 

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Realism in international relations - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 19:21, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Europop

message: Let's use more understandible terms...... Zazaban 00:32, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slick? Frothy? 

message: Indeed some of the artists of the list are "europop" 
But the list also include eurodisco, italodisco (discofox) even Eurohouse ones!!!
Better examples could be used I think.
I mean, Modern Talking europop? O-Zone? Dalida and Baccara? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Labrokratis (talk • contribs) 20:16, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The artists of the list could be far better 

message: I agree with the previous comment that Europop is much more then just the acts that fall in Eurodisco and so on. Besides that Europop as a definition has made a substantial shift to a more policial issue on the agenda of Europe, meaning that typical pop music from the several European is something preserve becaus it's unique identities. On the political lobby this resulted in actions from AIM, Impala, UNESCO and so on.
On private account we created a website of our own dedicated to all those unique pop-artists around Europe next to the political issues. We wanted to add the link to this page but Wikipedia was unsure if it was rightfull. What do you think? The URL is www.europopmusic.eu. Please let us and wikipedia know. 
Bnbass Bnbass (talk) 12:34, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  europop on the political agenda
Talk:Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (disambiguation)

message: dab pages are used for navigation purposes. The main article contains a more complete list of movies/plays, incuding this one - thats what articles are for. If you want to start adding red-links to dab pages, then there are about 2 dozen versions of this story that need to be added to the dab page which have no corosponding wikipedia article. You know, why this particular red link and not the other 2 dozen? Thats not what dab pages are for, articles contain the lists.  --Stbalbach 16:59, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Noise control

message: A user had altered this article by inserting a number of inaccuracies. Architectural design and occupational noise control are not "sources" of noise as the edit stated. That edit seems to be an awkward cut and paste of materials already in the article, but the arrangement has broungt in the inaccuracies. further the introduction was shortened to one line and all substantive information present in the introduction was dispersed to other parts of the article. Wikipedia guidelines for well written articles state the desirability of an introduction (see FAC item 3) to span the topic.  The inaccuracies and removal of a substantive introduction have been reverted.  In the future that editor is advised to discuss major article changes on the article talk page....i would hope others would comment on this matter. Covalent 16:33, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dispersal of introduction

message: Example of what we need:
This hybrid vehicle produces (20 dB) less noise than conventional cars because of .....blah blah
--Light current 01:37, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Car caption 

message: I added this section and included some regulations from a few organizations. If anyone thinks of other organizations that should be included, feel free to add it! Is there anything I need to change, improve, or add? Any help would be much appreciated. Brennen.d.kar (talk) 02:29, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regulations and Recommendations =

message: At present, the article claims: "Firstly, airborne sound travels through walls or floor and ceiling assemblies and can emanate from either human activities in adjacent living spaces or from mechanical noise within the building systems."
What about construction noise, backup beepers, sirens, aircraft, etc.? 74.96.172.110 (talk) 17:23, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: My bad, that was only referring to sound from within the building. But what can people do to defend themseves from sound from elsewhere? 74.96.172.110 (talk) 17:26, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Architectural Sound Protection
Talk:Capoeira/Schools

message: I placed http://www.berimbau.nl in the European schools section, because its website showed classes only in the Netherlands. I also changed the School heading of "Americas" to "United States," as the only schools listed are in the United States, and none in the rest of the Americas (and, indeed, "The Americas" almost always refers to Central and South America, not including the US). If you wanted this section to be titles "Americas" in case people want to put South American schools, that's fine, but I would recommend having those in a seperate section, titled "The Americas" and leave the US classes in their own group.
But I also have a question: how much of a comprehensive list do you want this to be? There are literally thousands of capoeira school across the world, and it seems pointless to list a random twenty of them. There are several sites that are databases of capoeira schools, however. Perhaps the best thing to do would be to simply link to them? I can give you links to such databases if you want.
--Asbestos 23:25, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schools
Talk:Máriapócs

message: Is the church really Greek Ortodox, isn´t it Greek Catholic as the first edit says? See CNEWA /Johan Jönsson 17:03, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Federation for American Immigration Reform

message: Per the reasoning given at WP:MISSION, I have removed the part of the "Mission" section of the article which was sourced only to PRIMARY sources from FAIR itself. The use of PRIMARY sources is discouraged, especially when they are likely to be biased.
The remaining material from the "Mission" section -- which was mistakenly placed there -- has been integrated into the "History" section. Beyond My Ken (talk) 14:09, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "Mission" section 

message: The text that says that FAIR is a white supremacist hate group is a lie. This is woke leftist disinformation. The SPLC is as horrible of a biased unreliable source as you can get. This part of the article has been removed hundreds of times. How many times do people have to delete it to get it to go away. I get the feeling that this is an article about the SPLC. Who cares what they say? This is a fine example of why people think that Wikipedia articles are complete crap. 2600:1702:B20:3040:D4F0:AC5D:4089:D9D8 (talk) 16:40, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The SPLC has been examined a number of times by Wikipedia editors, and has found to be a reliable source.  Unfortunately, your view of it is simply your personal point of view and is not supported by the known facts. Beyond My Ken (talk) 07:49, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The SPLC has a long history of lying. Not a single person aside from someone on the far-left would unironically believe that the SPLC is reliable. 2600:1003:B031:43A:9BD8:B32:616A:F6BB (talk) 18:46, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disinformation 

message: By presenting adverse information (the SPLC whining about FAIR) at the beginning, this page displays the intention to ridicule and discredit the movement. This violates NPOV and it should be moved somewhere down the page or removed from the page itself. 2600:1003:B031:43A:9BD8:B32:616A:F6BB (talk) 18:44, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poisoning the Well
Talk:Great hornbill

message: Removed this "(“tame” hornbills are known to enjoy having them scratched)" which has been around for a while without a citation. Shyamal (talk) 11:17, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed 

message: I recently added a video to this article of a bird labeled as a Great Hornbill at a Zoo here in Japan. It shows great deviation to the ones already on this page. Is this in fact a Great Hornbill? If not, the video should be renamed. Just checking, Nesnad (talk) 08:41, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any experts?
Talk:Morrisby Profile

message: If any of you know the correct times for the tests, please edit this.
I know the 
Reasoning is 30 mins.
Paddy 17:08, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://ptc.bps.org.uk/test-review/morrisby-profile. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:48, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Emre

message: So far none of the real life Emres in here seem to have lived prior to the 1930s (the Turkish surname law). For those who died before the 1930s, they should be indexed separately, as Turks at the time had no family names. 
WhisperToMe (talk) 01:25, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note on indexing
Talk:Eastgate Centre, Harare

message: There is an article on the thermal flywheel effect, which my source (The Zimbabwean Review, Oct 1995) says is happening in this design, but I'm not clear which effect is meant, and that article really doesn't help! Anyone qualified, please help out! Cheers JackyR 17:20, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  flywheel effect 

message: Check out Melbourne bdg, look through new external lks to improve article.
This article seems to be spending rather too much time on explaining how the air conditioning works, and less on the actual purpose of the building itself. Surely it would be wiser to move an explanation of the mechanics of the air conditioning used to another article rather than clogging up this one?
:The introduction gives the purpose of the building as retail and office space. If think you can expand that usefully, go for it. But what's notable about this building is the design. Remove that and what would the rump article be? Would Eastgate even warrant an article?
But there is now an article on passive cooling in general, so you might like to link and move the one paragraph about that. Cheers, JackyR | Talk 20:17, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo
Talk:Politics of the Maldives

message: Question: I have informations that the first political party was the Peoples Muthagadhim party, formed in 1951, that the people's referendum was announced in 1952, and in January 1953 the republic was announced and Al Amir Mohamed Amin was sworn in as the first president, killed 7 month later. But the history section starts with 1968. CoYep 17:26, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah Muthagadhim party was formed before Second Republic (Maldive Islands) and therefore, I think, cannot be first political party? --Oblivious 04:27, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Party, first referendum and first president 

message: Please note that the IP 194.242.55.7 edited this article as well as the one about Ahmed Shafeeq Ibrahim Moosa . As this edit reveals, the IP 194.242.55.7 is used by Niallcook, according to his page "worldwide director of marketing technology for communications firm Hill & Knowlton". His PR firm - best known internationally for spreading the lie about Kuwaiti babies thrown out of incubators in order to sell the Gulf war to the US public - was hired by the notorious Madivian government in order to improve its reputation and,  on top of obscene vandalism, was found to manipulate wikipedia articles as reported here:    . There may be more accounts that were used to influence this article. Using the wiki-tool of a whois search, one can find that all IPs in the range of 194.242.55.0 - 194.242.55.255 belong to Hill & Knowlton. Knopffabrik (talk) 18:34, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beware of spin by PR firm [[Hill & Knowlton]]
Talk:Suite (music)

message: It seems to me Suite de Danses is an early version of the suite, and a merge seems reasonable. // Habj 17:38, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should have a merge.  Lady Nimue of the Lake 08:51, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

text: * Merged 06-November-2006:  After 13 months consideration, the concensus was "Merge" due to redundant concepts with the same information.  The "suite" article now has a new section header "Form of suite de danses" which contains the former article text, and article "Suite de Danses" has been converted now to a REDIRECT to the combined "suite" article.  Formerly the separate "Suite de Danses" article was relatively unseen, gaining only one added-text revision after 8 months dormant, while the "suite" article had over 16 various text additions during the same 8-month period (Feb-Oct 2006, excluding robot edits).  -Wikid77 02:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging "[[Suite de Danses]]" 

message: More footnotes could be added to cite sources in the "suite" article. -Wikid77 01:54, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: This page should be moved to a more specific page- Suite (music) perhaps, and Suite should redirect to the disambiguation page, as there are many other definitions of "Suite."  Agree?
Creamypeanutbutter 08:14, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I don't see this at primary in this case. --Kleinzach 00:42, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Move

message: Suites are common in progressive rock and metal, examples being Rush's '2112', 'Book 1' & 'Book 2" of Cygnus X-1, 'By-Tor and The Snow Dog'. Here is a small list of prog suites. https://www.reddit.com/r/progrockmusic/comments/2smxy4/favorite_long_prog_suites/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.62.81.2 (talk) 23:01, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The prevalence of suites in the progressive genre 

message: Waslah does not give any information that it is a suite. It only talks about a group of arabic music. But a suite has to be Classical or Jazz. Hsjal (talk) 21:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing