lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Executive Council of Ontario

message: Does anyone know how to find past cabinet lists?  this is presenting a large problem.
Honour 20:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Despite the timestamp on that last comment, it is still a big problem. I can't find out when the Ministries of Energy and Infrastructure were originally put into place. — NovaDog —  (contribs) 14:12, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ten years later and this still needs to be fixed. We're losing valuable information by overwriting this page. // sikander { talk } 17:55, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: You can find some of this information on the Ford Ministry and Wynne Ministry Pages now. We should maybe make pages for some other Ministries like McGuinty. Legend of 14 (talk) 00:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Past Executive Councils

message: There seems to be a disagreement as to whether the ministers should be ordered alphabetically or by some precedence.  The premier's website uses an alphabetical list. The legislature's website also uses an alphabetical list. A provincial executive council is different than the federal privy council; membership is temporary not for life and therefore precedence does not apply in the same way.  What source suggests precedence?  I suggest we follow the example of the government's own websites and go alphabetically.  Thoughts? - Nbpolitico (talk) 12:55, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of ministers
Talk:Cynthia Ozick

message: Someone keeps putting up non sequitur photos and describing them as Ozick. First a tortoise, now a trash can. It's rather amusing, but I took them down. The holy barnacle 02:20, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The troll needs to take it somewhere else. --Evb-wiki 20:54, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Perhaps if we actually got an image of Ozick up on the page the vandalism would cease. Just a suggestion. 69.37.188.137 03:16, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No administrator assistance is required - any user account more than a few days old can edit the article. CMummert · talk 05:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of Ozick  

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 14:32, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: The reference to David Foster Wallace requires a citation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.216.56.25 (talk) 14:58, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: David Foster Wallace

message: Reference 4 seems to involve a Conflict of Interest.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.48.128 (talk) 15:37, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI 

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section:
* Cite templates will be used where possible.
* Tables may be used to organise short stories, poems and/or book reviews. 
* I prefer capitalization and punctuation to follow the standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, rather than "title case".
* Links to potentially unreliable digitised copies and to booksellers may be removed. 
This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 10:22, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Cynthia Payne

message: Could you fill us in a bit on the first 45 years of her life? 86.181.11.185 (talk) 20:16, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There's plenty of information in Paul Bailey's biography of her. If anyone has a copy they could add some details and cite the book. Polly Tunnel (talk) 18:04, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earlier career? 

message: Absolutely loved her. She should have been made a Dame. I remember saying to the career's officer at school "I wanna be the next Cynthia Payne". She was just iconic in every single way. What a life!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:C0A0:B01:7D56:42B2:65A6:80BC (talk) 07:52, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Loved her

message: Shouldn't there be mention of her sons Darrell Paine and Glen Nunn? 109.148.215.73 (talk) 09:51, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sons
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Alphachimp

message: Question: Why has this RFA not been approved or disapproved for two days? —Minun Spiderman • Review Me 19:56, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alphachimp may be still thinking it over.  --Kchase T 22:28, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alphachimp notified me via e-mail that he wishes to wait until August 11 to make his decision about accepting this RfA or not. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 01:14, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question from Minun
Talk:Cynthia Rhodes

message: Post deleted as off-topic commentary
--220.239.179.128 (talk) 11:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I took the time to rewrite the article, organize it, and cited the sources used in the document.  I don't know if it will still be considered a stub, but it looks 99% better than it did before.  --Candy156sweet 23:54, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You have to find a citation to prove that edit.  One was provided for the previous edit.  If you can clarify that fact, then by all means replace your edit with a citation.  --Candy156sweet (talk) 22:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned Up

message: This article was considered to be a stub.  Over the last couple weeks, I have expanded the stub into a full article.  Therefore, I removed the tag from the bottom of the page.  If there is a problem with this, please let me know.  :)  There isn't a wealth of data on the article's subject, but I tried to include as much valid information as possible.  --Candy156sweet 01:52, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: I have changed back a recent edit which reverted my earlier correction of the phrase 'made the conscious decision.' The reason is that it is a lazy use of language which is rather meaningless. Knowing of Wikipedia's predilection for published references:   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.224.43.24 (talk) 09:57, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Made the conscious decision
Talk:Cynthia Rothrock

message: This makes me laugh "Rothrock is five-time World Karate Champion in forms and weapons between 1981 and 1985.[3] These categories are not combat-oriented, being displays of fluidity of movement rather than fighting, and are therefore not segregated into male and female categories but fully open to both sexes.[4]"
Obviously, the writer does not know anything about the karate. There are many karate "associations" that organise "world championchips". I know many karate world champions, but they are champions because they were on a championship that has so many cathegories and so small amount of competitioners, that every third person there is a world champion. In America, they organise events like this every month, they do even the universe championchips... Secondly, there is nothing like "weapons" cathegory in the traditional karate. And last, but not least, the "forms" are called KATA and it is not true that they are "not combat-oriented", because the real katas have combat meanint, bunkai, which in the real championchips is a real cathegory(as teams kata, first they do kata, then they show bunkai) and the judges consider the combat part of kata a lot. It is about the perfection of the technique, but it is also about the speed, strength, prescision and combat application and the real cathegories are divided by sex and age.
I dare her and all famous american actors with many "world champion" titles to try the WKF world champs. The people who are there are real fighters - policemen, special forces etc.
:I bet she could kick your ass, though. --165.225.38.63 (talk) 15:58, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karate "world champion" 

message: It seems unlikely, though not impossible, that Rothrock was her surname at birth as well as her husband's surname.  Please verify. --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 03:07, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The article says nothing about what her surname at birth was, so there is nothing to verify. --IamNotU (talk) 03:20, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Maiden name

message: Hello,
After checking IMDb and doing several searches I believe that there are only 2 Rage and Honor movies. Rage and Honor 3 does not exist. However,  you can verify this before editing her filmography. 
Thank you, 
Angelo at entitylost@gmail.com 173.163.29.253 (talk) 14:48, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cynthia Rothrock's movies 

message: Normal procedure here , is to open a discussion and seek consensus, not editwar.  - FlightTime (open channel) 20:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox image change
Talk:Ferdinand Schumacher

message: Is their something wrong with the article. I changed the wording...Why is all those notices comming up?
MarkDonna
:Nothing at all wrong, MarkDonna!  It's all part of the collaborative effort that is Wikipedia.  Kudos to you for taking the initiative to start the article.  Every article, even longstanding articles, can always be improved upon.  What you're seeing is merely that process of continual improvement.  Thanks for your contribution! -- SwissCelt 20:20, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I'm afraid something was wrong. MarkDonna, your contribution was a copy of the text at http://www.ohiohistorycentral.org/entry.php?rec=333 . Copying works by other people is a copyright violation and against Wikipedia policy. I deleted the article, and started over with SwissCelt's edits. In the future, please remember to use your own words. Thanks. - EurekaLott 20:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Much to my surprise, I found that there is a German brewery by the name of Schumacher which is sometimes called Ferdinand Schumacher.  If ever there is an English article written about this brewery, we may need to disambiguate.  (Though at this point, I don't see reason why the Oatmeal King wouldn't be the primary topic for disambiguation.) -- SwissCelt 21:08, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible future disambiguation
Talk:Cyprian Brady

message: It states in the article that Cyprian Brady was the first ever TD elected without having won at least 1000 1st preference votes. This is referenced to an Irish Independent piece, but appears to be incorrect. According to: http://www.irishelection.com/2007/05/cyprian-brady-900-odd-first-preferences-1-dail-seat/ , Brian O’Higgins was elected in Clare in 1923 with only 144 1st preference votes. This was referenced in turn to electionsireland.org
93.107.86.173 (talk) 21:27, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Cyprian Brady is actually the second TD to be elected with less than 1,000 FP votes after Brian O'Higgins. Article updated. Snappy (talk) 19:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Franklin Avenue Shuttle

message: This article needs a spell check and a little more information. --imdanumber1 20:17, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What kind of information do you have in mind? This article is about the shuttle service. There is also an article about the line itself. -- Cecropia 15:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you check the other shuttle's subway line info table, that is what I had in mind. --imdanumber1 21:16, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. -- tariqabjotu 03:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvement needed 

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
# Support. Unnecessary disambiguation is clutter. It's easy to figure out it's a NYC Subway service from the lede. That's too much information for the title if it's not necessary to disambiguate. – flamurai (t) 20:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed to Support, as Flamurai's suggestion makes a good decision for move. --Imdanumber1 (talk • contribs) 20:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: # Support. Unnecessary disambiguation is clutter. It's easy to figure out it's a NYC Subway service from the lede. That's too much information for the title if it's not necessary to disambiguate. – flamurai (t) 20:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move

message: # Oppose. I really don't see the point in moving the article. The current title is just fine. --Imdanumber1 (talk • contribs) 16:40, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed to Support, as Flamurai's suggestion makes a good decision for move. --Imdanumber1 (talk • contribs) 20:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survey - in opposition to the move 
Talk:Lloyd Francis

message: While the Parliamentary website lists him as a privy councillor, he is not listed on the PCO website as a member.  Does anyone know for sure if he was named to the Privy Council?PoliSciMaster (talk) 02:15, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Privy Councillor? 
Talk:Liz Sagal

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) Even if duly released, however, the material would need substantial attention, as it does not incorporate reliable sources and hence does not meet our verifiability guidelines. Furthermore, the site cannot be linked to from the Wikipedia article, as it contains substantial violations of copyright, with images and video.
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material or link to external sites that we know contain such material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source and only if it otherwise meets our content guidelines. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:55, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Cyril Nri

message: It says 'In late October 2016 he made his debut as a recurring character in the Doctor Who Spin off Class.' However he only appeared in the final episode of the series so the character cannot really be described as 'recurring'.  It is possible that his character was intended to recur if it had gone to a second series, but if this is the case I think it needs clarified and evidence cited to support the claim. The other possibility is an assumption is being made that he was playing the same character as he did in [[The Sarah Jane Adventures] which like Class was a Doctor Who spin-off and set in the same fictional universe. However a) if the statement is meant to reflect that, it does not do so clearly and b) there is no on screen evidence for this and the characters were credited differently. Thus I think the sentence should be changed to say 'In late October he appeared in the Doctor Who Spin off Class', unless somebody can provide a rationale for the original wording.  Dunarc (talk) 23:39, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class
Talk:Cyril Takayama

message: OK, I cleaned up some of the advertisement talk. Winampman 15:23, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh lighten up! :)Kmarinas86 15:21, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Partly true, partly untrue. Right now, the page has a bit of biographical information, but not much detailed info about his performances, or even the awards he has won. There needs to be more hard facts beyond the group he belongs to, say, some of the tricks he's become known for, and possibly how he is one of the recent generation of magicians to utilize the "street camera" and the propagation of his performances via the internet. Cybertooth85 02:01, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Just had the same thought as I was reading this. Also, just randomly throwing in a name like "Ito" (I guess it's the "rich Japanese businessman"?) is really not a good thing to do. I barely know anything about him, so I can't correct this stuff, but the way it's written now is pretty bad. 80.108.52.77 (talk) 23:42, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaned up

message: No.  Not enough substance.  Do not split. Bejnar 23:59, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Split ?
Talk:Cyrille Regis

message: Hi all,
Cyrille Regis is a bit of an icon of mine, and a while back I emailed Hayes & Yeading United to find out more about his playing days there. They very kindly replied with a spreadsheet detailing the season he spent at Hayes, which details all his goals and appearances by competition.
It would be a great source and would enable us to add a Hayes row to the 'Career statistics' section, the only thing is with it literally being an Excel spreadsheet I'm not too sure how to reference it with regards to WP:V
In my email to them I did mention that I was a Wikipedia editor and I would love to improve the Cyrille Regis page so I do have permission to use the spreadsheet to that end, but I definitely don't 'own' the spreadsheet so I wasn't sure whether I could upload it anywhere.
Grateful for any feedback as to how I can source the document - it seems a shame for it to continue gathering digital dust!
Thanks, Nonleagueapps (talk) 09:47, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hayes stats
Talk:Cyro Baptista

message: A fair amount of the text that formed the core beginnings of this article were apparently put here by Cyro's publicist. Unless permission is explicit, much of that text is a copyvio from Baptista's website at http://www.cyrobaptista.com/page.cfm?content=bio. I'm just trying to rework the text because much of it is already wikilinked and it seems a shame to lose much of the info which deserves to be in the article. There is a fair amount of publicity puffery and peacock words however and this really needs to be scrubbed a bit to eliminate the excessive superlative adjectives. The man's career is obviously vast and varied; it doesn't need pointers to how wonderful he is. Pigman☿ 19:33, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio text removal 
Talk:Flock

message: This article was a redirection to the herd article. In the article about herds, there were disambiguation links to other uses of the flock name.
I do not know if this is stated in the Wikipedia guidelines, but we should not redirect to another article, with a completely different name (in this case, herd), and then try to send back users to the original article name, with disambiguation links.
Mathieu Bonnet 10:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the revert to a disambiguation page 

message: Isn't Flock also a name of a dog in a comic book? RocketMaster (talk) 20:09, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flock, a dog's name?
Talk:Will Jimeno

message: Wouldn't it be best if this artice was merged with John McLoughlin's since it gives the account of their struggle?
:No I believe both these men are equally notable as a result of their heroism and also their portrayal in the movie.--Mantanmoreland 18:58, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Agree with Mantanmoreland comments. In addition to that, this individual is now a published author. OnePercent (talk) 12:38, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: Can we change the photo to an actual photo of Will Jimeno rather than an actor portraying him? 66.149.37.250 12:45, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is one that may be usable, it's credited to "Jim Jimero", however appears to be a department photo which would be public. 
 William Jimero Image 11:40, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: "Four months after their rescue, McLoughlin and Jimeno — who both have since retired — took part in a ceremony at Ground Zero to watch as the final column was removed. When all the uniformed officers walked out of The Pit, the last two to be rescued were the last to leave."   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McLoughlin_%28World_Trade_Center_attack_survivor%29
Has William Jimeno retired yet? I thought the movie (World Trade Center) had said he did as well.Jlujan69 05:39, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Still employed at PAPD?

message: Why is there a [sic]in the quote after "32-year-old"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dom316 (talk • contribs) 18:07, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: sic in the quote
Talk:D'Arcy Boulton (heraldist)

message: Hello there.  I've updated a few links, and see on his Notre Dame emeritus page that he'd moved to Trinity College, Toronto upon retirement, but I can't seem to find him there.  Is he still alive?  Still active?  If there are links, please update.  Gratias tibi ago. Hoktiwe (talk) 03:15, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obituary? 

message: The redirect D'Arcy Boulton (heraldist has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 01:10, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:D'Arcy Boulton (heraldist]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:D'Wayne Bates

message: Georgia or South Carolina...GrahamHardy (talk) 19:45, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace
Talk:D. Harlan Wilson

message: I readded the tags removed without discusion by an anon. cleanup and fansite are always a bit vague, so definately need discussion when adding/removing and the unrefferenced tag is indisputable. Fansite i guess is due to the article mentioning his many "achievments" in glowing terms, while having nothing on his critical reception, or lack of mainstream success or awards etc.Yobmod (talk) 09:40, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tags