Talk:Super Tuesday

message: under 2008, that should say in the Spring of 2007 right?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.181.211.115 (talk) 19:14, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Typo?

message: No one is calling Feb 5 "Giga Tuesday."  The article referenced by the author is apparently the only news organization to call it such.  Terms like "Mega Tuesday" and "Super Duper Tuesday" are much more common.  If no one objects, I am going to remove the reference to Giga Tuesday, and fix the reference to something that is both more mainstream and which perhaps even discusses the name itself.  Brash 19:29, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This was answered at Talk:Super Duper Tuesday.  --Kralizec! (talk) 19:15, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it has.  My main concern is that I continue to encounter many media sources that refer to the upcoming Feb 5th 2008 primary as Super Tuesday.  While there are sources that refer to it as Super Duper Tuesday or Mega Tuesday or something similar, the way that things are currently arranged in Wikipedia gives the strong impression that the term "Super Tuesday" is no longer in use.  This is misleading. -- Macduff (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 20:38, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I was not aware of that.  What do you feel gives the impression that the term Super Tuesday is no longer in use?  Certainly anything implying that should be re-written to indicate that Super Duper Tuesday is most likely a one-time event.  As I indicated in the SDT article talk page, I have seen Super Duper Tuesday used to describe 2/5 and Super Tuesday used to describe 3/4.  --Kralizec! (talk) 14:38, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 2008's Super Tuesday

message: A republican delegate graph should be added--if one exists. Brahim 20:06, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Graph

message: I am removing the graph for the following reasons:
1. It is simply incorrect in regards to the numbers and proportions of delegates for each candidate.
2. The bar graphs are imprecise. 
3. Standings are likely to change often.
4. The expression of erroneus poll results in an objective medium like Wikipedia is likely to affect a viewers perspective of the candidates, this can have an effect on the nomination of said canditates, and as such does not consitute neutral information.
-D  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.104.234.21 (talk) 19:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Graph

message: Article talks about several different Tuesdays, some in Feb, some in March, and isn't very clear (throughout the article) as to which are which.
Also, there are no totals, to give readers an idea of how these dates have snowballed in importance over the last couple decades.  It appears (from the article) that:
2008-02-04 == 24 states
2004-02-03 == 5 states - according to this article, in different wiki article* they claim 7 states (which is it?)
2004-03-02 == 10 states (democratic mostly?) - CNN was calling this Super Tuesday
-2, poorly written and boo on locking it. ~ender - 2008-02-05 11:12:AM MST —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.240.27.45 (talk • contribs) 13:06, 5 February 2008 
:The naming issue is complicated by the fact that some years have had multiple "Super Tuesday" election events.  As an example, there were three Super Tuesdays (sometimes referred to a Super Tuesday I, Super Tuesday II, and Super Tuesday III).  In 2004 there was Mini-Tuesday (sometimes referred to as Super Tuesday I) in February, and then the main Super Tuesday election (sometimes called Super Tuesday II) in March.
:The 2004-02-03 election you refer to is covered by the Mini-Tuesday article.  This day had five states holding primaries and two holding caucuses (for seven total).
:Both the Super Tuesday and Super Tuesday (2008) articles are semi-protected due to the large amount of vandalism by un-registered editors.  Editors with registered accounts are still able to edit the articles.  --Kralizec! (talk) 18:37, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Which Super-Tuesday?

message: "This article is about the primary day" is only useful if you already know what a "primary" is, in which case you probably already know what Super Tuesday is likely to mean. So that sentence is not helpful.
Instead, how about "This article is about a significant day in the United States presidential primary process" ? - 198.144.208.11 (talk) 22:33, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Poorly worded disambiguation note

message: This portion was found at the end of this entry as of 5 Feb 2008 5:30 AM GMT:
Indeed, Ashwin Sundar will be the Republican and Democratic nominations in this year's elections, making him the first candidate in US history to win the White House as both a Republican and Democrat. Heil Ashwin.[5]
Vandalism?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.75.17.223 (talk) 05:30, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that  caught and started to clean this up about eight minutes after it was added.  --Kralizec! (talk) 06:29, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Are the Democrats' primaries always proportional, or are there any exceptions where the winner gets all the delegates in a state? Vints (talk) 19:45, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Democratic Party (United States) presidential primaries, 2008 article indicates that under Democratic Party rules, all delegates are awarded using proportional representation as long as the candidate reached at least a 15% minimum threshold.  --Kralizec! (talk) 13:07, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proportional representation

message: A brief article with a lot of good facts on Super Tuesday is here:  . Some notes: the term ST was first used in the New York Times in 1976 to describe a multi-primary event on the same date. Also the number of states has fluctuated, not gradually risen. More states voted on this day in 1988 than in any other year except for 2008. Chronicler3 (talk) 23:44, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A blog at the Oxford University Press by Ben Zimmer, an editor at Oxford University Press, also puts the earliest date in 1976 referring to the June 8, 1976 primary date for California, New Jersey, and Ohio.  However he doesn't give a source.-----Adimovk5 (talk) 00:16, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

text: It appears to be in the New York Times article "He Neglected to Protect the Center; The Jackson Campaign: An Exercise in How to Undo It" By DOUGLAS E. KNEELAND, May 9, 1976, Sunday, Section: Help Wanted, Page 136, 1074 words.  However, it requires a subscription/payment which I am unwilling to pay.-----Adimovk5 (talk) 00:24, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

text: The article in the NYT discusses the failure of Jackson's "big-state strategy" to win the nomination. The relevant sentence states "New York, Scoop Jackson's trump card, would open up a string of victories, in Pennsylvania, Indiana, Michigan, and finally, on super-Tuesday, June 8, in California, Ohio and New Jersey." Note the spelling: super-Tuesday. In 1980 and 1984, the day was called "Super Tuesday," and only after 1984 do the quotation marks disappear.  Chronicler3 (talk) 01:37, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earliest Use of Super Tuesday for Primaries 

message: It's almost here! shouldn't there be a separate article?Ericl (talk) 14:53, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Super Tuesday 2012

message: There was no info about next Super Tuesday whatsoever. Today I added list of states participating, together with source because that is really the minimum of information. Someone more experienced in wiki editing can put these states in table - it is more visually appealing. And maybe some further info. How many delegates? What percentage of delegates will be allotted at ST 2016?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.29.212.250 (talk) 10:56, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Super Tuesday 2016

message: I changed the chronology in order to benefit readers searching for info on Super Tuesday and what it means in the elections. Wikipedical came along and flipped it back without giving any reason. As far as I'm aware, there's no hard and fast WP rule that says the oldest must come first. Most readers coming to the page for the first time are looking for current information. As per the complaint of the IP above. With the newest first, the article reads much better. If the reader wants to get into the long history of Super Tuesday that information is there. But for those who want info on the current cycle, that is there up front and easy to see. It will draw the reader into the article more effectively than the oldest first, imho, so I reverted the change. SW3 5DL (talk) 17:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology 

message: Just a heads up for anyone wondering why the Super Tuesday 2016 map says "Purple" in the caption, when those states colored purple actually appear to be colored blue:
The user who made the current map image clearly meant to color those "blue" states in the map purple, as indicated by the file page description, but for whatever reason that user chose a shade of purple that's extremely easy to confuse with blue. I made an altered map with a more distinct shade of purple, but apparently Wikipedia up and changed how image uploading works on me. There's no option for me to upload a new version of the map anymore, and when I attempted to upload a separate, new file, I got scared I'd be banned for uploading an image which I copied and altered. Even though the license on the original file says I can do that, there's no license in this new "upload wizard" that allows for one user altering and uploading different versions of the works of another user even when that user says it's okay. The whole thing was confusing, and I don't want to risk getting banned on a technicality.
If anyone can upload a new version of the map with a proper purple shade in it that won't get them banned, please do so. Thanks.Joshbunk (talk) 02:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super Tuesday 2016 map colors (blue/purple error) 

message: lmao  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.27.245.27 (talk) 15:48, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  lol 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Super Tuesday. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120207171103/http://www4.vindy.com/content/local_regional/371130330062404.php to http://www4.vindy.com/content/local_regional/371130330062404.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:28, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There’s a map of 2016 super Tuesday states. Why isn’t there a map of 2020 super Tuesday states? Skysong263 (talk) 14:18, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super Tuesday 2020