lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tychism

message: Having read the page, this comes to mind, which I seem to recall Stephen Hawking quoted once: . 67.171.222.203 (talk) 21:26, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Ultimate Free Lunch 

message: Is the image in the evolution section necessary or presenting something that I'm not understanding? It seems a bit random to be honest  LiterallyDavidBowie (talk) 06:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evolution image
Talk:Stop! Look! and Laugh!

message: This page was moved from Stop!, Look and Laugh to Stop, Look and Laugh to remove the ! from the title. The title for wikipedia seraching purposes should not contain this kind of punctuation. The correct title is actually Stop! Look! and Laugh! but that would cause constant redirects when people try to search. Oanabay04 (talk) 19:32, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved

message: This article has July 1 for release date, then says it was agreed to release it on July 4 (with a source), and it links to threestooges.net, which has July 27.  What is the right date? GVO8891 (talk) 23:15, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was this film really released?
Talk:Collaborative intelligence

message: Hi, i removed the warnings for some minutes while a make some screenshots for a video to promote collaborative intelligence. As soon as I finish I'll put them back. --JoCalejandro (talk) 17:24, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

message: The current version of the article reads "Knowledge derived from collaborative efforts is increasing proportionally to the reach of the World Wide Web." The claim that knowledge grows in linear proportion to the reach of the Web is supported here by neither reason nor evidence, so I am removing the word "proportionally". Cat4567nip (talk) 12:57, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it's not even clear that the net effect of internet on knowledge is positive. Have added reference to Is Google Making Us Stupid? Cat4567nip (talk) 10:39, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linearity 

message: CQ doesn't imply that the knowledge and problem solving capability of a group is greater than the knowledge possessed by an individual group member. In a dysfunctional organization, it can be much less.  I just found this presentation on Organizational Intelligence, extracted from a 2001 book. Cat4567nip (talk) 13:02, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collective versus individual 
Talk:Elemental diet

message: Can anyone do some more research on this and find out if it's alternative or not? Thanks, Erythromycin (talk) 19:42, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative? 

message: "Vivonex" is not found anywhere on Wikipedia, save for this article. A clarification/definition is in order. Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 06:05, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vivonex?
Talk:Linebreeding

message: I oppose the merge, not so much because there is a significant difference between linebreeding and inbreeding, but more because linebreeding is an independent concept amongst horse breeders, and they get quite offended to hear it called "inbreeding," (even if it is) due to the implication of poor quality results.  So as a term of art, I say do not merge.  But just my two bits.  Montanabw(talk) 01:21, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry I didn't see this earlier, but participants on the inbreeding talk page unanimously voted to merge it, so I've done so now (a couple years later). This was effectively a content fork and only had one reference for something in an image caption. – anna 07:44, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Districts of Laos

message: I like that User:Blofeld of SPECTRE created the district articles. I moved the last provinces to "X Province" format and started wikifying the district  I discovered they were written different to the actual articles and decided to make redirects instead of changing the links. That way more different spellings can be catched, i.e. if user create links with different writings. Also this way possible ambiguous names with let's say African districts als named "Namo" are easier detected and not hidden via Na Mo vs Namo. TopoCode (talk) 16:44, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:AspectJ

message: I object to the sentence "he coined the term crosscutting". This term already existed before computer programming, in the logging of trees, as in crosscut saw and in cinema, as in crosscut scripting (which is a specific method of storytelling). 
It would be more accurate to say "he applied the term crosscutting to programming".
--Ancheta Wis (talk) 19:57, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Crosscutting

message: At which times can AspectJ weave?
*compile-time weaving?
*load-time weaving?
*run-time weaving?
--Abdull (talk) 02:21, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  x-time support
Talk:Outta Control (50 Cent song)

message: Secfan, we really should only have one article on the remix. The original only charted because some stations were curious as to how the original sounded after the remix was issued. OmegaWikipedia 16:48, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Article
Talk:Phou Bia

message: The exact Lao is "ພູເບັ້ຍ" (Phuu Bia2) as can be seen in the Lao name of Phu Bia mining company. Perhaps as a joke, this was given as "ພູເບຍ" (Phuu Bia), indeed to be translated by "beer mountain". Which it is not.
Rdavout (talk) 03:58, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beer mountain *homonym*
Talk:Long Lake (Alpena County, Michigan)

message: Long Lake (on the border of Alpena and Presque Ile Counties) Michigan needs to be documented.
Unfortunately, I've not been able to get this to take the categories, etc.  PLEASE HELP.
Thanks.
7&6=thirteen (talk) 20:21, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am trying ot put in a link to the Google map, and I wanted to embed the link, but only show the refence.  This has not worked out well.  HELP?
The other issue is that I suspect that the Latitude and Longitude I got from the fishing website may be incorrect.  when I put that in to Google, it give ma a Colorado site.
7&6=thirteen (talk) 00:57, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done a fair number of US communities and landforms, so I tidied this up using my normal sources/templates. Ravenna1961 (talk) 01:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: google map
Talk:Phonsavan

message: Does anybody know if Xieng Khouang was technically part of the Ho Chi Minh Trail? I thought the trail was limited to southern Laos and the Northern provinces had been bombarded due to the Pathet Lao (and assisting Vietnamese troops)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gavilan1644 (talk • contribs) 08:03, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Which administrative district is Phonsavan in?

message: Two different coordinates are given - positions are 5 km apart. It appears that the lower one (in the box; 19°25'N / 103°10'E) is wrong. 
--Uli Elch (talk) 09:06, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different Coordinates
Talk:Xam Neua

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* Write here
The position marked is about 250km off - Sam Neua is to the north west of the position shown
123.19.6.10 (talk) 03:45, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: I intend to delete  or Sầm Nưa of the page.
The name of this city does not have a fixed spelling or pronunciation in Vietnamese.
If no one comments, I will delete it.HDKhoa-h071 (talk) 13:47, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit
Talk:Thakhek

message: An editor keeps removing the following, which he originally called "trivia":
---
The city has many French colonial style official buildings, villas and shop-houses.
Plans to build a bridge over the Mekong, connecting Thakhek to Nakhon Phanom, are progressing. Construction is set to begin in 2008 and will take three years to complete. This is the third bridge connecting Laos and Thailand, after the ones between Vientiane and Nong Khai, and Savannakhet and Mukdahan provinces.
---
Not seeing how that's trivial at all. Based upon the editor's short but disruptive edit history of removing content and sources and then prodding/nominating for deletion, it would not surprise me if this were part of a plan to make the article look shoddy to grease the way to a delete vote. DreamGuy (talk) 15:46, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you although I can see where the other editor is coming from.  These are isolated facts that together do not aid a complete understanding of the subject.  More context to these statements would help with this.  Too many random snippets of information with no underlying structure would indeed be trivia, but this article is a stub and needs all the information we can get.  Snipping substantive material is only appropriate when we have a surplus of material and need to be selective in order to present a comprehensible overview of the subject.  That clearly isn't the case here.  CrispMuncher (talk) 17:37, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  3O
Talk:Outer Ring Road System

message: Doesn't make sense. The road on the map doesn't look anything like an orbital road.49.199.248.80 (talk) 07:18, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Outer Ring Road System is suppose to travel through Hougang Avenue 3, Eunos Link, Still Road, and Still Road South on the eastern end. Not sure why it has been changed in this Wikipedia page, older maps shows that. I mean, the link from Bartley Road East to Hougang Avenue 3 is rather disconnected, but I think its route follows that? SGTransitEvolution (talk) 04:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doesn't look anything like an orbital road.
Talk:Bokeo province

message: Does anyone have information on the new district ເຂດພິເສດນ້ຳຍູ້ (Nam Nhou special area)? It must have been created around 2006-2007 taking area from the three northern districts Houayxay, Tonpheung and Meung. andy (talk) 15:18, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New district
Template talk:Toei Oedo Line

message: I just ja-stalink'ed the instance of Tochōmae that was not so linked, because I thought it
was an oversight... now I see that it's a second copy of the same link in this template (I guess
because it's the place where the two ends of the loop come together).  Still, it seems reasonable
to leave it this way... why leave it as "dead" text, looking like a mistake?  No harm in having
it repeated. Djiann (talk) 20:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Survivor: Gabon

message: There is a proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Survivor task force#Jury vote tables to list the vote totals in the same order as the names in the finalist row immediately above the vote totals. All interested editors are invited to join that discussion.  Since the Survivor task force appears to be inactive, I'm notifying Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Reality television task force and the talk pages for each Survivor season in order to reach interested editors.  Schazjmd (talk) 16:43, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survivor jury vote table discussion
Talk:Provinces of Laos

message: Is there some reason why the names of provinces in the table are mostly spelt differently from the names of provinces on the map?   In one case, Houaphan, the name of article devoted to said province is spelt differently from both the table AND the map.  Is there no official standard for transliteration?  --Jamieli (talk) 04:56, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Spellings
Talk:Creole architecture in the United States

message: I noticed this article is currently not including French Creole Architecture for plantations, I know it is less common but I came across it when reading about Cedar Bend Plantation in Natchez, Louisiana. Adding a note in case someone wants to develop it further. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 13:26, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: French Creole Architecture
Talk:Sereď

message: It seems that editor Gomezko has been engaged in deleting Hungarian related material from the article, and beside this, reverting every kind of change change made to this article by others. Unfortunately, these reverted changes usually improved the content and English language of the article, as well as the not very nice appearance of the article.
I made some draft changes to article to fix some shortages, if someone is interested in them, please find it on my subpage User:Rokarudi/Sered'.
Suggestions and critisism is appreciated.Rokarudi 20:14, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, take a look at User talk:Elonka/Hungarian-Slovakian experiment, section "Naming conventions". Since the town doesn't have a large Hungarian minority (1.3% in 2001 according to the article), I think it's not necessary to give the Hungarian name a prominent place in the infobox. In the lead is OK with me, also for historical reasons. Markussep Talk 19:57, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Hungarian names
Talk:Vientiane Prefecture

message: There is content here which I believe rightly belongs under Vientiane city. Particularly the History and Landmarks sections. Users are likely to visit the Vientiane city article first and may not necessarily visit the Vientiane Prefecture article.
For History, all but the last paragraph of History would rightly belong in the Vientiane city article. Or better still, a History of Vientiane subarticle might need to be created. This could then be linked from both main articles to avoid version differences which have now arisen in the texts. 
And for Landmarks, this info is something a user would expect to find under Vientiane city. But some landmarks do pertain to the prefecture e.g. Buddha park. Again a subarticle is likely the best course.
(This issue also added to Vientiane talk page)
Declangi (talk) 03:50, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate content in this article and Vientiane city article 

message: 1900 / 12 / 14 HP/ BD  Air-tattoo (talk) 07:44, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ghosts time
Talk:Vientiane province

message: The photo montage shown in the infobox includes many pictures taken in Vientiane Capital (Pha That Luang, Patuxai, etc.), which belongs to Vientiane Prefecture split apart from Vientiane Province. Therefore, the montage needs to be redone, or replaced with a single photo from the Vientiane Province. Tango7174 (talk) 00:24, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Tango7174 (talk) 15:15, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo montage in infobox needs updating
Talk:Veľké Kapušany

message: A major gas plant is located south of the town and owing to its importance in recent political events, there should be some mention of it in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.9.195.168 (talk) 08:02, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gas Compressor Station
Talk:Xiangkhouang

message: Does Thathom belong to Xiangkhouang or to Xaisomboun Province ? The district is listed under both provinces... --katpatuka (talk) 09:03, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thathom District
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/King Óðinn The Aesir

message: User:King_��inn_The_Aesir
    run at Sat Dec 15 21:00:11 2007 GMT
Category:              3
Image:                 1
Mainspace              51
Talk:                  22
User talk:             14
User:                  9
Wikipedia talk:        4
Wikipedia:             11
avg edits per page     1.92
earliest               10:25, 8 April 2007
number of unique pages 60
total                  115
2007/4   22
2007/5   44
2007/6   0
2007/7   0
2007/8   0
2007/9   0
2007/10  0
2007/11  27
2007/12  22
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes
edits without an edit summary)
           Mainspace
5 Duergar (Dungeons & Dragons)
5 Norse mythology
4 English folklore
4 Myrging
3 Dracula AD 1972
3 Frankenstein
3 Fairy ring
2 Duergar (folklore)
2 English people
2 Abraham Van Helsing
2 Hammer Film Productions
2 Dracula in popular culture
                Talk:
3 Modern Celts
3 Sub-Roman Britain
3 English people
2 Germanic peoples
2 The Legend of the 7 Golden Vampires
2 English folklore
     Category:
2 Arthurian legend
               User:
3 Doctor Hesselius
2 Sigurd Dragon Slayer
2 King ��inn The Aesir/Snorri Award
      User talk:
4 King ��inn The Aesir
3 Briangotts
2 Barliner
                 Wikipedia:
8 Requests for adminship/King ��inn The Aesir
2 Requests for adminship
            Wikipedia talk:
3 WikiProject Norse history and culture
If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at User talk:Interiot
.
Based directly on these URLs: [1]
* The edit count was retrieved from this link at 21:00, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for King Óðinn The Aesir
Talk:Ministry of Public Security (Laos)

message: According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thongbanh_Sengaphone he is no longer the minister. Dmatteng (talk) 13:58, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Talk:National Assembly of Laos

message: Hi, this article is relatively outdated, simple and includes some errors. I would like to extend and update it over the next weeks. MrParliament (talk) 15:06, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Talk:The Singer of Tales

message: From amazon.com:
* Paperback: 352 pages
* Publisher: Harvard University Press; 2 Pap/Com edition (May 5, 2000)
* Language: English
* ISBN-10: 0674002830
* ISBN-13: 978-0674002838
* Product Dimensions: 9.1 x 6.1 x 1.2 inches  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.30.17.14 (talk) 17:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book Information
Talk:Belá (river)

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Bela River and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 20#Bela River until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:15, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bela River" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Dark Shadows (1991 TV series)

message: The "Ratings and cancellation" section currently says: 
: Though the series debuted to great success, watched by nearly 1 in 4 households, ratings declined as the onset of the Gulf War disrupted the broadcast schedule. Part of the blame was also placed on NBC for promoting the series' horror and vampire themes rather than the more appropriate romantic and fantasy themes.
This is not an accurate explanation for why the show's ratings declined. The broadcast schedule was not disrupted by the Gulf War -- after the 4-hour premiere, an episode aired on Friday every week, except for one pre-emption on February 22nd between the 8th and 9th episodes. 
The "part of the blame" sentence is from a defensive Dark Shadows fan's point of view. Who says that romantic and fantasy themes are "more appropriate" than horror and vampire themes? It's a show about a vampire. Clearly the network's promotions worked, because the debut got great ratings. The ratings declined because people didn't like what they saw. You don't always need external forces to explain why a television show doesn't work; sometimes it's just not a very good show. -- Danny (talk) 00:57, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Cite a source. The passage you isolated is corroborated by several reliable sources. Your counter-argument looks like a lot of personal interpretation and OR to me. I also have to question why, if you are convinced your argument is valid, you felt a need to disguise your user name. Canonblack (talk) 11:28, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Explanation of the show's low ratings
Talk:CASA C-102

message: Note that Jane's Encyclopedia of Aviation lists this aircraft as the CASA C-112. This error is evidently carried over from Jane's All the World's Aircraft 1978-79, the first yearbook to describe the type where the same error can be found. All subsequent editions of Jane's describe it correctly as the C-102. --Rlandmann (talk) 18:51, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:House of Champassak

message: Hey Wikipedians,
Just a quick remark - considering that "na" (ນະ in Lao/ณ in Thai) is a word meaning 'of' similar to Romance 'de' and German 'von', wouldn't the current title ("House of Na Champassak") be grammatically incorrect? Anyhow, let me know if 'House of Champassak' is acceptable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CasuallyK (talk • contribs) 14:56, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing Title
Talk:Emma Goldman/Archive 2

message: The section, "Conspiracy to assassinate the President" is titled such to suggest she did conspire with Czolgosz when she was later found innocent because "authorities were unable to connect her and the others directly to Czolgosz's crime". So did she have a connection, or was she simply a suspect? 
I'd like the title and text to reflect the ambiguity of this situation, and some expansion on the trial might be in order. There's a burden of proof involved with any sort of trial, regardless of the history of the defendant. It is likewise with the reporting of that history. Kennard2 04:52, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. At a minimum, it should have a neutral title such as "Assassination of President McKinley". Or maybe something like "The usual round-up of anarchists after the commision of a crime, in this case the assassination of President McKinley". ;-) Malik Shabazz 20:06, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguity 

message: The article says that she "became a confirmed believer in the concept of the Attentat"; Attentat redirects to bomb, and that page gives no mention of the word.  I can't find it in any standard dictionary.  This word needs more explanation.  --Trevor Burnham 17:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for noticing that. Attentat refers to Propaganda of the deed, the concept (to over-simplify) that direct action will inspire the masses to start the revolution. Attentat used to redirect to that article, but somebody changed it to bomb. I've changed it back. Thanks again. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 18:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attentat 
Talk:List of monarchs of Laos

message: The whole entry was rewritten using the best english sources available (including translations of primary sources)- dates are difficult because of transliteration or conflict even in primary sources.  There are many other sources in French. I will try to correct/create pages for all available entries. Thanks! Lan Xang Lao (talk) 19:50, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the whole article is a mess, especially the Lan Xang section. There were no sources quoted at all, and the only source I could find on a relatively quick search (ironically it had been used as a copyvio source for some of the individual articles) conflicts with names and dates, and it's not clear who is who in the list. I've patched it up as best I can for now, but we really need some more sources for this. I'll put it on my list of things to do and come back to it as and when I have the time -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:33, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

text: It also looks like the some of the same kings have been included twice, presumably due to confusion over their names. For now, I've done the best I can up to Interregnum (1438-1441) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:03, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: There's references to a Codes book, but no actual name of the actual book. Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 08:09, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Codes book?
Talk:Cure cottages of Saranac Lake

message: Great work, Mwanner... I like it and learned a lot from the article!  A direction for refinement would be to add specific inline citations (footnotes) identifying source of info for each paragraph or fact stated.  That would be relevant for bringing article towards featured article status.  Awesome start already! doncram (talk) 15:34, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nice job, and footnoting