lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Theta Chi chapters

message: Interested readers may note with alarm that the page has been changed to a more standard format used with other Greek Letter Organization lists.  When complete, the revised format will be more easily searchable. Editors from outside of Theta Chi (thus besides the very dedicated Theta Chi editor, ) also take pride in improving these pages in ways that make them more consistent and useful; these are the editors making these changes, here in late April, 2023.  The separate sections, by alphabet series, were problematic because they didn't allow simple searches.  This update fixes that problem.  We use bolding and italics to denote active and dormant chapters, respectively. We add school names, and locations, both city and state, with Wikilinks, in sortable fields, and regularly add interesting and useful extended footnotes (EFNs) that add important context about prior locals, jurisprudence, and select (~encyclopedic) comments.  We also police these pages for vandalism. Jax MN (talk) 23:19, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Just adding that these changes are being made as part of a standardization project of the WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities. Rublamb (talk) 04:03, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table updates
Talk:123 (film)

message: I removed the plot, because it was wrong. Wrong plot, wrong actors ...
Don't know the right one. But this is NOT the Sanjay-Dutt/Zayed-Khan-flick.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.78.246.26 (talk) 05:59, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of compositions by William Byrd

message: I would like to give this page a bit of a revision and, as a newbie, thought I'd better signal my intention here first - not sure if this will be read by too many people, but I'll leave it a few weeks before doing anything.  Some things that I'd like to add or change:
*First of all, complete the list (of published as well as unpublished works) - the contents of the Gradualia need adding, as well as unpublished keyboard and consort works.
*Remove the voicings (SATB etc.) after each work - these were never specified by Byrd and are open to the discretion of modern performers - one person's high tenor may be another's low alto, for example.  Also, some of the voicings on the page are perhaps based on modern transposed editions rather than the original publications.
*Include Tallis's contributions to the 1575 Cantiones - cross-referenced to that composer.
That's about all - nearly all the hard work has already been done by previous contributors!
--Hdfraser 21:21, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While I agree that maybe it's not the best idea to keep the voicings, I still think we should specify the number of voices, especially for the liturgical pieces. I have noticed that I have stupidly put the accent on the 'a' the wrong way round and I shall soon begin the laborious task of correcting this.Bewareoftheevilcheeseman 18:57, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Voicings

message: This article says its a piece by Byrd, but I don't see it on the list.  Just a heads up. DavidRF (talk) 01:55, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes - this page doesn't yet include any of Byrd's complete but unpublished vocal music - lots of it, including your famous example.  The Great Service and Sing Joyfully are another two top 10 hits.  One day...
--Byrdnuts (talk) 21:21, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Ye Sacred Muses]] 

message: What about De lamentatione, listed as a work of Byrd's in the entry on him (not to be confused with Tallis' composition of the same name)?PloniAlmoni (talk) 07:29, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: As the section above shows, this is a long-standing shortcoming of the list – Ye Sacred Muses still isn't listed. The two other liturgical works mentioned along De lamentatione in the William Byrd article, Ad Dominum cum tribularer  and Domine quis habitabit, aren't listed either. Thankfully, Wikipedia is the place where people can do something about it if they are dissatisfied with the information presented. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:41, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  De lamentatione
Talk:Tameside Hippodrome

message: Could someone please add co-ordinates using one the  series? Pit-yacker
:Done.--LeoNomis 22:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Location
Talk:Mouth

message: The page history that used to be at the mouth page is now at mouth (disambiguation). The page history and text that used to be at this talk page is now at Talk:Mouth (disambiguation). Graham87 16:52, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page history 

message: *Is Wisegeek a RS on the Wiki? Is is currently used an in-line reference in this article. Snowman (talk) 15:45, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourses
Talk:Second Amendment Foundation

message: "Doctors for Responsible Gun Ownership (DRGO) [...] educates the public by searching and posting the best articles using science and medicine in dealing with firearm politics..." ---  "Best" articles? Oh, really? Why do I find that descriptive just a little bit suspect in this entry? Just cut the opinion-driven word. And these docs simply "search" but don't RESEARCH articles? What kind of science is that? 50.216.77.242 (talk) 02:39, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self aggrandizement
Talk:Serb People's Party (Montenegro)

message: First of all, the SNS can not be considered extreme right in any way, it has even applied for membership in the European People's Party. It's positions are liberal (or rather libertarian) when it comes to economics, it is conservative but it is no way reactionnary.
Furthermore, it is cultural conservative as it wishes to implement measures to safeguard Serb cultural identity in independent Montenegro and wishes to do so in accordance with all relevant European and international regulations as well as in such a way that no other nation in Montenegro is at loss, it supports equal rights for all, Serbs, Bosniaks, Albanians, Muslims, Croats and Montenegrins.
--Igor82 21:25, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Err, I think you mixed it with the People's Party. ;) --PaxEquilibrium 17:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cultural Conservativism
Talk:Second Amendment Sisters

message: I'm going to take off the Neutrality tag because the talk page is empty, until someone give a reason for it it doesn't need to be here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.166.244.193 (talk) 02:33, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The lone source I found didn't support most of what was in the article. Here it is, preserved.
:Second Amendment Sisters, Inc. (SAS) is a non-partisan women's advocacy group in the United States dedicated to the protection of gun rights, specifically for the purpose of self defense. It is an all-volunteer 501(c)(4) non-profit organization based in Texas, with chapters nationwide.
:According to a 2003 Los Angeles Times times article, SAS was founded in December 1999 by five women who were "outraged" by the Million Mom March. Using the Internet, these women and a handful of other volunteers staged a counter-rally in Washington, DC, on Mother's Day, May 13, 2000. In the months preceding these events, the media regularly called upon SAS to represent the equal counterpoint to the Million Mom March in print, radio and television, including a two hour televised Good Morning America town hall meeting from the White House on the Saturday before. On March 18, 2008, SAS organized the rally in support of Dick Anthony Heller's right to keep an operable handgun for self-protection in his home subject of the United States Supreme Court hearing of DC v. Heller in Washington, DC.
:SAS interprets the Second Amendment as recognizing the pre-existing natural right of individuals to bear arms as tools of self-defense, and promotes gun safety and marksmanship among their members. They focus on community outreach, women's firearm shoots, women's personal safety training, and political advocacy. Citing FBI crime statistics, they assert firearms are the only reasonable means of self-protection, especially for women, people of short stature, people with disabilities, and the elderly.
:Second Amendment Sisters had a column in Gun Week. The group's slogan is "Self defense is a basic human right."
''
--Lightbreather (talk) 02:58, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preserve unsourced (for over five years now)
Talk:A. Subbarayalu Reddiar

message: I think the merge completely makes sense, there seems to be reason to merge it, even though its hard to tell if they are the same person due to the nebulous nature of this article. - Merge Redian  (Talk)  21:40, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection

message: I believe this post needs an overhaul.  Retroperitoneal lymph node (dissection) is associated with various cancers, not just testicular.  We have to remember that the lay public are accessing this to find out what 'retro peritoneal lymph disection' is, and not necessarily how this pertains to one specific cancer- a  diagram/drawing of where the retroperi nodes are would be helpful.  Sorry I am not the one to make those changes.  naturedr  10 Nov 2014  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naturedr (talk • contribs) 18:54, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: note
Talk:Wardle Canal

message: The word operator has been replaced with navigation authority.  I propose to change this back - navigation authority is a modern term and does not describe what was in place in 1829.  Its use could cause confusion, especially as the page navigation authority gives a list of navigation authorities, none of which were correct for 1829. Salinae (talk) 22:34, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Navigation authority
Talk:City of Norwood v. Horney

message: I am thinking about editing this article to reflect the procedural posture, the issue before the court, exactly what the two sides were arguing, and the grounds on which the Ohio Supreme Court found for the homeowners.  I think that because this was the first case involving a state supreme court's interpretation of the 'public use' clause and whether eminent domain can be used for private development after the US Supreme Court Kelo case, this information should be included in the article.  Any thoughts?  Lawiggin 12:55, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely- the fact that this was the first post-Kelo ruling is its strongest argument for notability. 4.229.219.206 04:38, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Martyn Wood

message: A reserve goal-keeper for Harrogate Town is not notable and I speak as someone who has paid money to watch Harrogate Town. On the other hand Martyn Wood is a former England and Lions international rugby union player and far more deserving of this page. Ironically he is also from Harrogate.
I will edit accordingly.GordyB 13:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Karl Wolf

message: I removed material that was word-for-word from this page: ; see WP:COPYVIO. --Paul Erik 21:53, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation possible 

message: "Fuck Shit Up" as an alternative title for "Mash It Up" is not vandalism but the actual title of the single. http://itunes.apple.com/ca/album/f**k-s**t-up-feat.-three-6/id465811306 Please keep. Also don't replace by F**k S**t Up as the song title clearly mentions the full words. We don't censure words in Wikipedia if they are actually used werldwayd (talk) 23:07, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative title "Fuck Shit Up" not vandalism
Talk:Marvin González

message: These category tags are present:
Category:Sportspeople involved in betting scandals
Category:Sportspeople banned for life
But nothing in the article indicates these categories apply. They're rather prejudicial and seem to indicate that either the appropriate references need to be added or the categories need to be removed. FA Jon (talk) 04:21, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category tags unsupported by text of article
Talk:Swimming at the 1988 Summer Olympics

message: It would be nice/better if the name of the individuals fell on one line (in the individual events), rather than being forced separated onto two lines. This may be the function of screen width; however, it could also be helped/assisted by having the country flag moved from the before the swimmer's/athlete's name to before the country name. Hooperswim (talk) 00:09, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name layout
Talk:Swimming at the 1980 Summer Olympics

message: Hello. Can someone please find the starting & ending dates for Swimming at the 1980 Summer Olympics. I'm trying to tidy up pages for Olympic Swimming from past years, and would love some assistance. Thanks.
Jgwilliams873 (talk) 18:49, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates
Template talk:HMS

message: This template is intended to be kept in sync with , but as with many things documentation may fall out of sync with code changes.  So looking at Template talk:USS may yield additional insight, or not.  If one falls too far out of sync, please chastise us over on WP:Ships.  Thanks, --J Clear 23:52, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also 

message: Please see section by the same name in Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (ships) for a discussion on use of "the" or not with H.M. ships.  Comments welcome at that page. — Johan the Ghost seance 15:47, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The" with H.M. ships 

message: Per a discussion at WikiProject Ships, I've updated this template to use  as a meta-template. The changes were tested in the template sandbox and the template testcases page. If there are any problems with these changes, please revert and let me know. Thanks. — Bellhalla (talk) 05:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template update 

message: Hi ! Could you add fr:Modèle:HMS to the interwiki links ? Thanks ! Gonzolito (talk) 21:16, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interwiki link 

message: His Majesty's Brittanic Ship/Schooner was used in the late 1700s, predating the use of His Majesty's Ship. In the case of the ship Gaspee, I can find references to the ship name in longform as, His Britannic Majesty's Schooner Gaspee but not as HBMS Gaspee.<ref>Bartlett, A History of the Destruction of His Britannic Majesty's Schooner Gaspee, in Narragansett Bay, on the 10th June, 1772: Accompanied by the Correspondence Connected Therewith; the Action of the General Assembly of Rhode Island Thereon, and the Official Journal of the Proceedings of the Commission of Inquiry, on the Same. What's the right thing to do for ships that were never called HMS but were still part of the Royal Navy? --Mike32065 (talk) 01:03, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anachronistic Usage 

message: The "_" (underscore) character is converted into a non-breaking space. This leads to some long titles that do not have breaks in them. I noticed this on the 1773 page. On January 17 the template was used for  and there was excessive white space at the end of the line before the link. Changing the template to a link fixed this, though this should not be necessary. Mike32065 (talk) 01:03, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-breaking spaces
Talk:Swimming at the 1972 Summer Olympics

message: Hello. Can someone please find the starting & ending dates for Swimming at the 1972 Summer Olympics. I'm trying to tidy up pages for Olympic Swimming from past years, and would love some assistance. Thanks.
Jgwilliams873 (talk) 19:44, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Aug 28 to Sep 4 per Sports-reference. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 20:29, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: Hi. It's me again. Didn't Shirley Babashoff win a gold medal for the 4x100 medley relay? Why isn't her name listed with the rest of the team?
Jgwilliams873 (talk) 18:50, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Babashoff for Medley Relay
Talk:Ghost character

message: Reading through various editions of Romeo & Juliet, it seems he does not appear, but a ghost character named 'Horatio', presumably a Montague, appears at the beginning of Act I, Scene IV, at least in one edition I studied in school.
He is discussed at []. Is there any other evidence that can be found of his existence, and if so, is it worth adding him to the article? Pookiyama (talk) 18:56, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Horatio in Romeo & Juliet

message: I seem to remember that Coriolanus' wife is another ghost. Virginia?
DionysosProteus 01:55, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've actually started an article on her at my sandbox. Although there is one scene where she enters, exits, and says nothing, She plays a very large role in the play, so I wouldn't call her a ghost. It's Volumnia, too, by the way. Wrad 02:00, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another ghost 

message: The following passage has to do with non-speaking roles, which doesn't really belong in this article.
"Other plays of the period include ghost characters, such as John Webster's The White Devil, in which "little Jacques the Moor", "Christophero", "Guid-antonio", and "Farneseis" are mentioned entering, but have no lines." reference:  David Gunby et al. (eds). The Works of John Webster: An Old-Spelling Critical Edition'. Cambridge University Press. 1995. p. 125 StBlark (talk) 22:02, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed a passage
Talk:Avolar (UAL Corporation subsidiary)

message: All:
I see that this page has been marked for speedy deletion. However, Avalor was a genuine subsidiary of United Airlines Inc., existed in mid-2001 and through March 2002. If successful, this would have been the first fractional jet subsidiary of any major US airline.
I plan to add other information about Avolar. Since this is in no way a commercial solicitation of any sort, I am not sure why this should be deleted.
Regards,
Ramnarasimhan 22:10, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Jujube, others,
Thanks for the explanation. I am adding references and will make this more substantive. This is my first article on Wiki, hence these errors. I am going through the guidelines and incorporating them into the page as I am able to.
Thanks,
Ramnarasimhan 23:42, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the tag because the article asserts notability now, and have moved it to what seems to be a better name. Picaroon 01:34, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Usually, articles should be longer than this before they are declared start-class, but if you think all the info has been exhausted, then you can remove the stub tag. Picaroon 18:24, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Okay, I am adding references 
Talk:Dogū

message: I recommend it.  After all, the opening paragraph of the Shakōkidogū article says it all:It is so well known that when most Japanese hear the term "dogū," this is the image that comes to mind.--ip.address.conflict (talk) 03:46, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please merge ASAP. And can editors please keep this and the other page on their watchlists to prevent the utter crap edits that I just removed from the other page. Dogu is not the video game or part of the useless American and Japanese modern. 74.12.76.223 (talk) 21:35, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: The article seems to be written as though the write believe dogū is a plural noun, but since Japanese does not have grammatical number, it can't be. I've assumed it is OK to use the word unchanged in English as either singular or plural. Imaginatorium (talk) 09:45, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammatical treatment of topic
Talk:Kilmacrennan

message: Why in the world are there two articles Kilmacrennan and Kilmacrenan, about the same small Irish town?  Clearly, a merger is in order. ---Charles 22:24, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two articles? 
Talk:More (band)

message: ::: MORE is hard rock band not heavy metal.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.103.194.186 (talk) 10:22, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tennessee Secretary of State

message: Could someone pease reword this?  I'm sure we can do better than this.  Rags (talk) 01:26, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  First sentence 

message: Being elected by the general assembly does not make the secretary a part of the legislative branch.  Many members of various branches of government are chosen by other branches.  This is part of the separation of and balance of powers.  Many judges, including supreme court judges, are chosen by a different branch, for instance the President.  A judge appointed by the President, and then confirmed by the legislative branch, is still a member of the judiciary, NOT the executive or the legislative.  It is less clear in the Secretary's case, as he/she is somewhat autonomous, but he acts as an executive, an administrator, however he attained his office.  He answers to the governor, primarily, and is a part of his administration.  I have also seen this malarky on one of the tn.gov pages.  The more you read, the more hoakum you will find.
Legislators create law by writing bills.  Separation of powers allows neither the governor, sec of state, nor any other of the executive branch to write law.  Neither is any member of the judiciary allowed to write law.  Judges create precedent by their rulings, and this is called making law, but it is intrepretation of existing law, already codified.  An executive's job is to carry out, or to enforce, the law.  That is the job of the secretary of state.  He could be arguably classified as judiciary, but never legislative.  Rags (talk) 02:29, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duties
Talk:Minnipa, South Australia

message: I'm interested to know if anyone knows what the  name Minipa means. I'm assuming it's indigenous. 49.199.135.151 (talk) 10:26, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of the name.
Talk:Arnold Field (Tennessee)

message: I have re-written the article in question. I consider it mostly done for the moment. 
Two years ago I actually visited the air base and have been to the museum, so it was pretty easy to write the article from scratch. 
I re-used some of the information found in the disputed article, and I left a lot of information out as well. I did not mention all the names of museum related people or the director of the museum because I did not consider that too relevant for the context. I also did not mention the details of former air shows or homecoming events hosted by the museum as they seem to be in irregular intervals only and lack relevance for the general topic as well. Reason for this is that a log of past events of an organisation of minor importance does not have room in an encyclopedia. Lack of relevance.
As Arnold field is the municipal airport of Halls, and the Veterans' Museum are on these very grounds I would add a redirect page Veterans' Museum (Halls, Tennessee), too. However, I would not move the page completely to that page as it seems that some people use "Arnold Field" and "Veterans' Museum" sort of synonymously. So it might make sense to keep both.
To address the notability tag in the original article my vote would be that it is notable enough. It is a museum and not too bad if one is interested in the subject matter. I have seen longer articles about more trivial topics in Wikipedia, the notability of which is not in doubt.
As for the references, I do not think that any other reference than the museum website is available. I have searched a while but did not find third-party references.
PS - I am not related to the organisation running the museum or its staff, nor am I living in Halls, just to make sure that I am not biased to one side or another.doxTxob 18:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-writing article

message: Good portions of a new article (Veterans' Museum) have been merged into this article. The new article has been redirected to this one doxTxob \ talk 03:53, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging articles

message: It would be nice to have a photo or two of the ols Dyersburg Arny Air Base that is not copyrighted or  restricted.doxTxob \ talk 03:53, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo request