Talk:This Tuesday in Texas

message: :Image:TuesdayinTexas.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:TuesdayinTexas.jpg

message: According to Meltzer, the WWF was aiming at doing weekly PPVs. That was the failed experiment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.191.199.11 (talk) 12:13, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You have a source for that claim? TJ Spyke 15:04, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That is incorrect. According to most sources, The ppv was a attempt by WWF to establish Tuesday night pay-per-views something they could do going forward, but it doesn’t work out, considering the next WWF ppv on a Tuesday Was 13 years later at Taboo Tuesday 2004 2603:8081:2104:3C27:3962:CF3B:5D90:5A9E (talk) 17:27, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Experiment

message: Probably the most likely reason it did not do very well was, there was no advance publicity for it until nine days before it happened.  The kayfabe reason they turned this event into a PPV was because of how the Hogan-Undertaker title match at WrestleMania ended, so obviously they couldn't advertise this as a PPV before they had even said there would be a PPV that night.  Also, TV Guide had "To Be Announced" in its listings grid for that night (as it went to press before WrestleMania took place and they had made the announcement about this PPV; the time slot was chosen as WWF PPVs were always repeated on the main PPV channel nine days later).  -- That Don Guy (talk) 03:56, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: WTF? First Of All, Hogan v. Undertaker Never Happened At WreslteMania. It Happened At Survivor Series 6 Days Earlier, And WWF Did Advertise The Event At Survivor Series. 2603:8081:2104:3C27:3962:CF3B:5D90:5A9E (talk) 17:30, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of Publicity 

message: As reported in the results section of the article, it states that The Legion of Doom defeated The Beverly Brothers in a dark match on the date of December 3, 1991.  However, in the site thehistoryofwwe.com The Legion of Doom defeated The Beverly Brothers the day before, December 2, 1991 in a match that was featured for a VHS tape called Invasion 92.  On December 3, 1991 it was reported that The Legion of Doom faced the team of The Rockers (Marty Jannetty & Shawn Michaels) and they also faced The Natural Disasters (Earthquake & Typhoon).  It is unknown if these matches were taped and used for Prime Time Wrestling or if these matches were simply for the enjoyment of the crowd.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lbkid1700 (talk • contribs) 04:40, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Legion of Doom