lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Psychic surgery

message: I'd say that stating he declared he was cured without a citation should be removed. If he stated it there has to be a source somewhere. If he didn't say it then the statement should be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.155.48.112 (talk) 05:35, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ¡Oh yeah!  Kaughman has perfect health now.  If it would not have worked, he would have died from cancer, but his running and winning marathons all over the world proves that psychic surgery cured him.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.233.65 (talk) 01:03, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kaufman 

message: I've been to a psychic surgeon, and he helped me a lot with my back. Helped my wife even more.
Then, reading the start of this article.. :)
What to say. Gsoler (talk) 19:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: If you think it's biased you're welcome to modify the start of the article, provided you cite reliable sources. Uanfala (talk) 14:06, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Psychic surgery, a pseudoscience constituting medical fraud

message: The actor Peter Sellers died after going to one in the Philippines.
Should add to article.
~~Bill~~ 2607:FEA8:4A2:4100:E4D8:1994:2E91:D60 (talk) 00:04, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Talk:Oxygen difluoride

message: Someone made an edit to this article saying it is sometimes thought of as an oxide rather than a fluoride. How widely believed is this?? Georgia guy 22:55, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the density is wrong is to high dens for agas drom oxygen and fluorin  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.176.97.146 (talk) 17:14, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  density 

message: Note that it cannot be classified as an oxide because of larger electronegativity of the fluorine. However, covalent-bonded electrons are not moved to fluorine atoms almost at all, so the molecule is not polarized. But formal, it`s oxygen difluoride, not difluorine oxide.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.159.166.98 (talk) 07:18, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: The given reaction equations and products in the section "reactions" are somewhat inconsistent. Is sulfur oxidized to the state +4 or +6? And why does a reaction of OF2 with a reducing agent release elemental fluorine but reduce the oxygen? --79.243.250.21 (talk) 23:17, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: One could say that there are whiners and there are editors.  Which one do you choose?  Get book and look it up! --Smokefoot (talk) 01:38, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reactions 

message: According to a crossword puzzle today OF2 is an odorless gas.  I suppose if it completely destroys the olfactory cells before they can send out a signal, then it would be.  Otherwise, I would expect it to have an odor similar to fluorine. Gah4 (talk) 05:24, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  odorless
Talk:Kumdo

message: : Hi, Folks:  I have been doing a bit of editing on this article as I found the English as bit stilted. I hope the result flows a bit better. I will also be doing a bit to add some pictures, contribute citations and expand the terminology. I could use some oversight here since Korean is not my native language. Best Wishes. --Bruce W Sims (talk) 23:17, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Sony Ericsson T68

message: Why is the past tense used in the article, is there a guideline for doing so? My T68i still works perfectly, and every time it stopped working I opened it with the appropriate Torx screwdriver and cleaned it, so it's still a wonderful phone! :P (I'm not joking even if today it's the 1st of April ;) ) -- 09:56, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past Tense 

message: does anyone know of any environmental features that the T68 has? I was just wondering for a project that I am doing in school  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.68.33.6 (talk) 13:56, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Environmental features
Talk:The Way to Amalthea

message: Though technically the spaceship described in the book is driven with a kind of a solar sail, I don't think that the original Strugatsky brothers' idea of the photoreactor should be described in such a way. --Targi 23:56, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. :) --Targi 07:31, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solar sail? 

message: Among the things that I think are needed to make this article better:
*Where was it published? Where has it been reprinted? Where/when did the English version come out?
*What is its particular significance? Where did it come in the development of the Noon world?
*What is its significance to science fiction at large? Or specifically to Russian science fiction?
*What have critics, other science fiction writers, etc said about it?
Until some of this out-of-universe information is added, I feel that the tag is appropriate - at present the article is slanted almost entirely towards the diegetic world of the story. Phil Sandifer 18:59, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the "in universe" tag.  Looking at the guideline linked in the tag, it clearly does not apply.  All of the suggestions above are good ones which would improve the article, but do not make the article "in universe." - 152.91.9.144 22:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup template
Talk:Alice in Wonderland (1985 film)

message: I have done my best to respect User Dieschwarzetur's work in cleaning up the plot. I still am not sure what the assesment may be as it is now. I hope no feelings are hurt. Hoverfish 18:43, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: After having done a second round of improvements, I am of the opinion that the plot flows nicely, given in a sweet style but comprehensively so. One can take a fairly good idea of the film's plot. The article may be missing some other sections, but this is another matter. Therefore I remove the cleanup template. If a future reassessment finds need of further cleanup, it may be put back. Hoverfish 00:47, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning the Plot 

message: One critic, panning the 1998 version, complained that adaptations try to add plot to what is basically an episodic collection of bedtime story chapters. This version, however, adds the them that Alice is trying to find her way home. She's stuck behind the mirror by her own fears (of growing up). She tells the red queen she can't "play" because she must be going home, but she's told to become a queen first ("and then you may go home"). This parallels the plot in Wizard of Oz where Dorothy must "kill the witch" before she can go home. 
Now, how do I add this to the article? --Uncle Ed (talk) 18:23, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism
Talk:Oil-for-Food Programme/Archive 3

message: The article's intro had said $46 billion went for food, etc. But 3 or 4 paragraphs later, it said only $27 billion. Which is it? And why such a large disparity? 
I juxtaposed the two versions so contributors can see the variance more easily, when I rewrote the introduction.
By the way, have I articulated the controversy neutrally? If not, please cut and paste any biased sentences here in talk. --Uncle Ed 18:06, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: How much went for food?

message: Any reason not to move Oil for food to Oil for Food program? I think I'll just be bold and start doing this. --Uncle Ed (El Dunce) 18:33, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I did it. But there are still many oil-for-food or Oil for Food references which ought to be changed to Oil for Food program. I wish I had a bot to do this. --Uncle Ed (El Dunce) 19:03, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The official name of the program is Oil-for-Food Programme. That's the official UN spelling. Dumbledore 03:49, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: It says:  "Sevan allegedly was given vouchers for at least 11,000,000 barrels (1,700,000 m³) of oil, worth some $3.5 billion."  That works out to $318 per barrel.  I don't know what the typical value of a voucher for a barrel of oil is, but that sounds awfully high. 66.203.191.64 00:49, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the price right?
Talk:List of monarchs of Bavaria

message: This list is all but impenetrable to the willing and curious average reader. Slight expansion of this very close-mouthed format might help, especially if a brief appositive ("victor at Lechfeld") were added in some cases. If dependable genealogical data are not available before the Liutpolding, a brief introductory paragraph maybe? --Wetman 00:59, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That was then. Now, Sebastian scha.'s expansion and tabular format are turning this into quite a reader-friendly article, well linked to the rest of Wikipedia! --Wetman (talk) 23:13, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Might it be more prudent to only include in the list people who were specifically Dukes/Electors/Kings of Bavaria rather than Kings of the Franks/Germany?  Emperor001 (talk) 13:44, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Inclusion of Charlemagne and Louis the Pious?

message: This article includes en dashes (–) in groups of three, four, and five numbers. Usually, the en dash is used to indicate a range, so I don't know what to think when I see something like 
* Garibald I 540–555–591
* Odilo ?–736–748ys,
* Grifo 726–748–748–753
* Charles I the Great 748–788–794–799–814
If there is a meaning to this sort of thing, it should be explained in the text. If these are errors, they should be fixed. —Anomalocaris (talk) 02:09, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Zenzic-Eváristos: Thank you for for the explanation. I see multiple styles. For example, House of Habsburg does it as I expect, with life date ranges and ruling date ranges, each range having the usual exactly two dates. However, Family tree of Russian monarchs does it in different ways. The Rurik dynasty section has 3 or more dates separated by en dashes dashes and/or hyphens, without explanation, as you did here, but the Romanov dynasty section uses only 2-ended date ranges. Can you point to anything in Wikipedia that explains or "authorizes" the "Rurik" style? —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:55, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dashes in groups of three, four, or five numbers
Talk:Zohar Manna

message: As a professor at Stanford and with notable advisees among his at least 30 students, there is more that can be written about his work, including in particular more cross-references.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vkuncak (talk • contribs) 20:02, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Help needed

message: I have taken courses with Professor Manna and he has told us first-hand that the third volume of The Temporal Logic of Reactive and Concurrent Systems is half-written but will never be finished. That's why I thought it was okay to refer to the intended trilogy as such, instead of listing the first two volumes separately. Feel free to disagree and change the phrasing. --Thibgc 09:56, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am not going to waste my time arguing here, and only say that this revert is wrong. It is really sad that no news site published an obituary till now (a message about his death and funeral was published in the printed edition oh Haaretz hebrew newspaper). דוד שי (talk) 17:03, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe this tweet will help you. דוד שי (talk) 17:15, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zohar Manna died 

message: Professor Zohar Manna died on August 30, 2018  see on Tweeter here. Please update the article. Thanks. Hanay (talk) 06:38, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:   Death of Zohar Menn
Talk:Brereton C. Jones

message: Don't we have a picture of this guy to include in the article? He was a governor of a U.S. state and is still alive and still actively employed in a high-profile role, for goodness sakes. A picture that is also suitable for inclusion in the List of governors of Kentucky would be desirable. —BarrelProof (talk) 12:25, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo desired
Talk:Russophone

message: What is the significance of mentioning Russians (in most cases sent as colonisers, which violated the international laws) "residing" in Soviet-occupied areas? Speaking Russian as their primary language clearly shows that they never assimilated into local cultures. 71.102.74.156 22:10, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Russian IS part of the local cultures. They've been together for hundreds of years!
-G  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.117.158.83 (talk) 06:46, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

text: According to the legend, it is not significant area, it is a city with significant russian speqaking population. You may ask ask the author of the map to put more detailed info into the page with the image. `'Míkka>t 20:56, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, my bad! I intended to ask about a region with a 'significant Russian speaking population' and not a 'significant area with Russophones'. Thanks though! Julyda4th 09:28, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Sinophone

message: The Sinophone page has undergone several incarnations. It originated on 21 October 2004, was transwikied to Wiktionary sinophone on 22 May 2005, was erased and made a redirect page to Chinese language on 14 November 2005, and was redirected again to Chinese language#Language and nationality on 15 May 2008 (which became a dead link). Since the subject meets WP:N guidelines, I restarted the page on 10 November 2012. Any editorial help would be appreciated. Keahapana (talk) 01:48, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page history
Talk:Nez (singer)

message: For a May 2005 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Nez
----
she was not born in izmir she is from istanbul an went to londom when she was 3  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.215.199.102 (talk) 17:10, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a lot of news on her in Turkish. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 01:54, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Axl

message: Does anyone have any information regarding the 'manga by Iwamoto' that is being referred to in the article? I honestly believe that whoever wrote that should quote his/her sources. Also, the 'intense annoyance' remark about Axl seems more like speculation than fact to me. 209.94.219.218 06:34, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article lacks sources in various points. It also cites intrepretations of character's attitudes as matter-of-fact, rather than as interpretations.
::Not a problem. I plan to overhall this article very soon. All POV statements and laudible information will be removed. -ZeroTalk 17:07, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article's Sources 

message: In the Wiki article, I noticed that it is said that 'Axl is not officially employed as a Maverick Hunter, although he is allowed to work alongside them'. According to the Mega Man X8 manual, however, Axl is described as someone who 'left Red Alert to become a Maverick Hunter'. I think that that particular point about Axl not being one should be removed, on those grounds and the logical reasoning that the Maverick Hunters frown on vigilantes (as depicted by Signas' disapproval of Red Alert in Mega Man X7's dialouge, who said that they were a group of 'wannabe vigilantes'), so, therefore, why would they have vigilantes working for them?
::It says, specically: 'left Red Alert to become a Maverick Hunter'. That is not as plausible as saying he became one. Also, remember the fact, X and Zero are essentially the head of the organization, so they can make just about anything acceptable. -ZeroTalk 18:17, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Axl's Status as a Maverick Hunter

message: It's notable enough for an article.Ollie the Magic Skater
:If it's notable, where have people taken note? There's nothing here that isn't sourced to direct observation of the games themselves. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 09:39, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uhh. no it should not be merged. 

message: I think that most people who type in just "Axl" would be looking for Axl Rose, not a MegaMan character.  I also think there should be a disambiguation page.
:Good idea. I've done that. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 22:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Axl Rose
Talk:Bellemoor School

message: For a May 2005 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Bellemoor School
----
New leadership team effect outstanding progress, school out of special measures in three terms, key stage 3 Maths results now place school in top 25% of UK schools. Successful start to accelerated curriculum resulted in high number of level 8 awards. Continued sporting success across all sports including rowing and athletics.
I just hope this wasn't written by one of the teachers, or this school is in trouble..
I think the paragraph contains valid information and should be kept, but at the moment it's ungrammatical, and provides no context for what it says - no-one unfamiliar with the details of the UK national curriculum could make sense of the second sentence. Details of the alleged sporting success should also be provided. Kisch 02:03, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

message: I have assessed this article to guide future improvement, the feedback I have given is: This article needs a large cleanup as much of its sections have NPOV and accuracy issues. This article also needs an infobox, better structure and more content. Camaron1 | Chris 11:14, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for doing that, I have corrected the linkage in the infobox for you. I have also restored this articles stub status - it was rated "Stub" class originally and I think it has not quite reached a sufficient length or numbr of sections for an upgrade to "Start" class at this time. Camaron1 | Chris 18:41, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: this is obviously written by members of staff at bellemoor hiding the truth (the poor quality of teaching, bullying, low grades etc...)  A pupil at the school has been contributing with facts every now and then but staff at bellemoor are quick to delete the edits and replace them with propaganda.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.17.52.110 (talk) 21:29, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article should be written from a WP:NPOV; so if teachers and pupils are going to edit this article their edits should follow WP:NPOV and WP:CITE. Camaron1 | Chris 11:50, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  teachers
Talk:Bishop Quinn High School

message: Anyone know the current student pop for 07/08? 75.100.155.37 01:07, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: I was looking for the website for this school while doing research and clicked on the link provided in the stub.  Not quite sure what's going on, but it's definitely not routing to the school page.  
thanks!
75.165.118.249 (talk) 04:20, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website needs verification by someone official
Talk:Young Americans (album)

message: Luther Vandross is one of the backing singers on this album. The first paragraph of this article has the effect of exaggerating his importance on the record. It might as well say "with backing by John Lennon".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.72.208.149 (talk) 20:28, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Luther Vandross

message: In reviewing the citations that are on this page, I learned a few of the sources no longer exist on the webpages. There is not a current way to review these articles for further learning on this particular topic. I have also added new sources that are valid and accessibble via internet and books. The edits for these sources will be placed in the introduction and album developmetent sections. The introduction was not well-written, engaging nor did it supply the reader with valid information. Davidenglish2 (talk) 02:21, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of Citations that no longer exist 

message: Win, Right, Somebody Up There Likes Me, and Can You Hear Me all have one sentence non sourced, non-notable articles and prove no notability. Is there anyway we could just delete them all, I think their lack of information even qualifies them for speedy deletion. Though I will say that "Fascination" could be expanded and "Fame" and "Young Americans" the song have quite well made and notable articles. Obviously Across the Universe has more to do with The Beatles than Bowie... so can we just delete the articles for tracks 2, 4, 5, and 7? Also expansion for track 3. --Mrmoustache14 (talk) 22:08, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no reason to wait for some huge consensus: feel free to trim out any unsourced statements or speculation. 87Fan (talk) 23:48, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Mass deletion
Talk:Fluorinert

message: Fluorinert is great
:What about Formic acid? Thanx 68.39.174.91 18:47, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was told by the gentlemen who run our Crays that they use it on premature babies who's lungs do not work yet to expand them and allow them to breath, AND that it can be used to replace blood plasma.  I was in the military at the time and I was told the military did experiment with it but would not use it in the field because of its possible flammable/explosive properties.
Can anyone confirm any of these claims with any sources?
Thanks Joegas (talk) 12:52, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use as blood plasma and other medical uses 
Talk:Live at the Fillmore (Testament album)

message: I've seen no evidence that this release was made into a DVD, nor that it was filmed at all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.206.124.13 (talk) 23:25, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Live at the Fillmore DVD?
Talk:Pulk

message: pulka is the actual "sled" not the activity in sweden — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThrBigD (talk • contribs) 01:50, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Propose move to Pulk. Which form is most used in English? Jørgen 19:40, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move 

message: Pulkka is mostly the name for the toboggan used for children. The pulled device used for transport is :fi:Ahkio, :sv:Ackja. I don't really see the need for different article for pulk(ka). It is just the different language name for toboggan. --SM (talk) 02:14, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In Swedish :sv:Ackja is exclusively used about the Sami reindeer-pulled pulka. (Ahiko stems from the Norse word "akjo"), but more importantly both the pulka and the ackja are built more like a flat-bottomed boat which means its a totally different construction. BP OMowe (talk) 04:15, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of the article

message: In English, pulk is the sled and pulka the sport. See  and  and  and dog sled and  and  and . --Espoo (talk) 00:08, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:UE]] 

message: At least in the US, the difference between a pulk and a sled seems to be the rigid towing system.  Note this practice among the various manufactures via here:
 http://skipulk.com/index.php/links 
In some cases the same sled is sold with and without the rigid towing system and in one case it is called a sled and the other a pulk.
Whitis (talk) 10:47, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rigid poles 

message: There are barn doors.
And there are revolving doors.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.29.41.212 (talk) 23:37, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Revolving doors]]