lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ashaig

message: It must be a very broad wiki-project.
45ossington (talk) 05:54, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, the category Holy Wells was in :Category:Anglo-Saxon Christianity and fed the list I had made on AWB. I have been trying to reorganize that whole hierarchy within :Category:Anglo-Saxon England so that those type of problems don't come up in my list. I didn't figure out the wells until I was part way through the list. Sadads (talk) 12:27, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Anglo-Saxon??

message: "Hamlet" seems a rather English description. Could one call Ashaig a "township"? Or is there any other better description?
45ossington (talk) 07:43, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hamlet or township?
Talk:Assemblies of God in New Zealand

message: I've added a reference to Ian Clark's book. There is a request here for more inline references. This book could help  Circumspects (talk) 15:56, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. Do you happen to have any of these books in your possession? If so, could you add inline citations? It really would increase the reliability of the article. Also, you may be interested in contributing to the Assemblies of God article. Happy editing! Ltwin (talk) 23:23, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Ltwin, I have the Clark book.  I'll start thinking about this.  The reason I haven't is purely insecurity.  Seems a complex matter.  Watch this space.  When I start, I'll let you know . . .   Circumspects (talk) 22:30, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Great! I've done a lot of work to Assemblies of God USA getting it up to Good article status. So, I have books on the American AG but am totally clueless about the other fellowships save what little I find in scholarly journals. It's great that you've got a source. If I can be of help let me know. Ltwin (talk) 05:31, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: :Category: and related categories have been nominated for . You are encouraged to join the discussion  on the Categories for discussion page. Ltwin (talk) 17:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  CfD nomination of [[:Category:{{ucfirst:Pentecostal pastors}}]]
Talk:Ambry

message: Where is that stated? There is a huge number of parish churches in the Church of England which have tabernacles on or behind the high altar. They have in almost all cases been installed with a faculty and permission from the diocesan bishop.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fiddleback (talk • contribs) 16:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tabernacles forbidden in Church of England 

message: Merge this with Almery. They are the same thing. In fact there's nothing to discuss... --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 23:03, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Babylon Rising

message: I strongly believe that this article is heavily biased against christians or (dare I say it) possibly even contains parody, due to its highly negative portrayal of  the ideas espoused in the series. For the above reason I recommend that the article be rewritten, as soon ad it is convenient. Thanks  83.71.100.190 (talk) 15:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased
Talk:Bell, book, and candle

message: In the Wingdings font alfabet of Microsoft Windows the bell, book and candle are also next to each other []. Coincidence?
S!lver NL (talk) 09:42, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wingdings 

message: Since this was included in the Roman Pontifical up to Vatican II, was it performed right up to then, or had it long since fallen out of use? Beorhtwulf (talk) 09:52, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent practice 

message: This looks like fancruft:
:The British thrash metal band Sabbat references the ritual on the album History of a Time to Come in the song "A Cautionary Tale": 'Bell, book, and candle, candle, book, bell, forwards and backwards to damn me to Hell'
From a quick search, hundreds of songs have "bell book candle" in the lyrics, dozens of songs are titled that, and there's at least two bands with the name (one of which has a Wikipedia article). While Sabbat is notable enough to be covered by Wikipedia, I doubt this particular song is important enough that it's relevant to a page about the ritual. If I'm wrong, someone can explain (or, better, cite a published explanation) and add it back. --157.131.246.136 (talk) 23:58, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  How notable is the Sabbat song?
Talk:Brethren in Christ Church

message: The Brethren in Christ church now refers to itself as Be In Christ. Any reaon we shouldn't rename the article, with appropriate redirects? DJ Clayworth (talk) 00:44, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the American version still calls it Brethren in Christ https://bicus.org, while the Canadian version renamed itself to Be in Christ https://beinchrist.ca/. Please do not conflate the two. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:24, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK. We definitely need to note and consider the Canadian name change and at the very least make a redirect. I'll give some thought to how we want to do this. Any suggestions? DJ Clayworth (talk) 13:50, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is an interesting case. This article is mostly about the US branch, so what may be needed is a split for the Canadian branch or a rewrite to address the difference. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:23, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

text:  This isn't a long article, so my preference is to edit (gradually) to reflect both branches, and only split if it becomes necessary. I've added appropriate redirects. DJ Clayworth (talk) 13:57, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  All new content should have references from reliable sources. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:54, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Be In Christ
Talk:Type C3-class ship

message: Somebody moved this article from "Type C3 ship" to "Type C3 class ship". This is NOT a "class" of ships in the typical naval sense -- it is a type of ship built during the WWII era. As far as I know, the word "class" is never used in connection with these ships. I think the article ought to be moved back. --Lou Sander (talk) 13:25, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "CLASS" ???
Talk:Music Theatre International

message: Yes, I know this article has been deleted 3 times already, mostly because of copyvio's? (couldn't find the AfD discussions) Music Theatre International is a well known licensing agency issuing many (if not all) licenses for amateur musical theatre productions. It has more than a few links under it's "what links here", including the dab page for MTI. So yah, just leaving a quick explanation as to why i'm re-creating a page that's already been deleted 3 times. Any questions/comments, feel free to let me know. Best Regards --omtay38 05:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-creation again

message: This page has already been deleted 3 times prior to this for being non-notable and gets re-created every time. I shall try to add some information to the article that asserts the company's notability. I'll put a response here when I am done with hopes that the page will be re-considered for speedy deletinon. --omtay38 15:22, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My revisions are done. I could not find as much information as I would have liked on this topic, however, do believe the article at least asserts a bit more notability. My suggestion (because this article has been deleted and re-created so many times) would be to take this article over to AfD instead of speedying it. The final decision, however, is up to the reviewing administrator. Happy editing! --omtay38 15:47, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Deletion 

message: I don't think that the article should contain a long list of shows licensed by MTI.  It already contains a short-ish representative list of important shows licensed by MTI, and that list is, IMO plenty long (in fact, it could benefit by being shorter).  See WP:NOTLINK.  I also think that a separate List article that contains basically a list of all the shows licensed by MTI, would be prohibited under WP:NOTADVERTISING, which says: "Wikipedia is not a ... vehicle for ... advertising and showcasing."  Also WP:ARTSPAM says: "Articles considered advertisements include those that are solicitations for a business [or] designed to promote a company.... WP:LINKFARM also says: "Wikipedia is not ...  a repository of links". -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:27, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: List of MTI-licensed shows

message: I propose that MTI ShowSpace be merged with the Music Theatre International article. This article is just a stub, and after talking to the Director of Marketing at MTI, he feels like the information could easily be moved over to the official article. Mikebloom819 (talk) 00:50, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with MTI Page
Template talk:Airports in Turkey

message: Hello. I added Rize-Artvin airport on this template, but someone  revert my change for this reason (unsourced, article does not even exis). Let me explain something :
# Firstly if there is not article on Google it is not mean this thing not exist. There is an article on Turkish Wikipedia (:tr:Rize-Artvin havalimanı) about this airport.
# I don't know any way for add source on template. I didn't see any references section on templates, did  you?
# If you spent time for revert this change for serach on Google you will find some reliable sources. For example (http://www.dailysabah.com/money/2016/06/13/rize-artvin-airport-in-northeastern-turkey-to-be-built-at-sea Daily Sabah)
If you have any question please ask me. --Aabdullayev851 (talk) 03:41, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rize-Artvin airport
Category talk:American bodybuilders

message: Alot of strongmen were listed here. There IS a difference between strongmen and bodybuilders, so don't list strongmen here. I've removed them. Claidheamohmor (talk) 05:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Anyone have a good idea how to not keep flooding the Category? Sorting them into male and female would do something but not much. How 'bout 1900's American bodybuilders and 2000's American bodybuilders? Lots of work, yes, but how to make it possible to overlook the Category? What I mean is, some of them would be double categories, might not look so good? Is it a bad idea? Other ideas?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chaan (talk • contribs) 22:21, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sub-Categories? 

message: The female one has 95 pages so shouldn't we create a male one and place male americans in there? Ranze (talk) 18:08, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Male subcat
Talk:George T. Babbitt Jr.

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 15:35, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Rinkhals

message: I feel it should be pointed out that rinkhals are in fact not true cobras, as they have keeled dorsal scales (as opposed to smooth) and give birth to live young, true cobras lay eggs.
Also they can only "spit" their venom from an upright position, as unlike spitting cobras they do not have hollow fangs and "spit" their venom by letting it drip down their fangs and then flicking it forwards. --LaughingManic (talk) 19:03, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Couple of facts 

message: The distribution section of this page claims "This species is found in the Southern Cape province of South Africa,...". There is no Southern Cape province. There is the Northern Cape, Western Cape and Eastern Cape. The Western and Eastern comprise the southernmost parts of South Africa.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greatmar2 (talk • contribs) 09:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: They are also found in the North West Province of South Africa.  IanPhilbrick (talk) 11:47, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution 

message: The name of these snakes sounds German, but in German, they are called Ringhalskobra, note the g instead of the k. Is there an explanation for this typo? – Sivizius (talk) 17:45, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: PS: Ok, might be Africans (it is also Ringhals in Dutch, so I assumed it to be the same in Africans too first). If this is the case, this should be in the article. – Sivizius (talk) 17:48, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Are there even any deaths reported from being bitten by these specimens?
The last death reported was completly ages ago, the venom only causes necrosis once injected and does not immediately kill, if even at all. 90.233.201.144 (talk) 09:36, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Regardless of your opinion on this matter, if you keep adding unsourced statements to this article, you will be blocked from editing. No source = no addition. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:33, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Johan Marais of the African Snakebite Institute, the last death from a Rinkhals was decades ago. I will provide reference once I have accessed his latest book on Snakes of Southern Africa. IanPhilbrick (talk) 11:42, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deaths reported from a bite? 

message: This reference needs to be excluded as the Rinkhals is not a Cobra at all as stated, it falls within its own Genus and is the only species within that Genus. The history of its name which or may not include the term "Cobra" is acceptable however. IanPhilbrick (talk) 11:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a true Cobra 

message: The venom of the Rinkhals is largely cytotoxic with an element of neurotoxicity, with a mixed syndrome of Painful Progressive Swelling and Progressive Weakness. Reference African Snakebite Institute App for now. Will reference Johan Marais' latest book on snakes of Southern Africa once I gain access to one. IanPhilbrick (talk) 11:39, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venom
Talk:Mary Ellicott Arnold

message: I have classified this article as a start due to its level of detail. Capitalistroadster (talk) 06:01, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Classification
Talk:Prem Joshua

message: Prem Joshua exists on various pages of Wikipedia (New Earth Records, Chinmaya Dunster, Trident Entertainment and Karsh Kale) as a dead link because earlier articles about him have been deleted. This article has not been written by Prem Joshua or by anyone connected to him and is just a source of information about him.
Ujjivan (talk) 06:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pimp Juice (drink)

message: This reads like a well writen article, it includes origins and contraversy over the drink.  I think the deletion flag is unwarrented.  Im not sure about the specific policy but even if it was more like a ad, i think it should be set for a normal vote based deletion.  That would ensure objectivity.  In summation, I believe this is much more than a product ad, even though you wouldn't catch me drinking it ZyMOS (talk) 06:10, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. I only tag them for speedy delete. An Admin declined deletion so if its good enough for them. So I guess I was a bit hasty. Sting_au  Talk 06:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow!  Article went from creation to well written, referenced and with a table in less than two days.  I agree that given the controversy, particularly the USA Today article, it passes notability.  WLU (talk) 18:56, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks in no small part to you. It has certainly come a long way since I first tagged it with a speedy. I do a few newpage patrols when I'm in the mood, and I can only go on what I see first up. Sting_au  Talk 21:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I'm awesome.  I will point out that even the first version, from what I can see, would have passed WP:N and WP:CORP based on the USA Today article alone in my opinion.  WLU (talk) 21:37, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of census-designated places in Maryland

message: The 2010 United States Census reflected numerous changes to the list of CDPs in Maryland.  I am currently in the midst of updating Prince George's County, Maryland to the current list, but I don't have the resources to do this for the whole state.  Anyone care to take it on?  --Ken Gallager (talk) 19:27, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update to 2010 CDPs
Talk:Atractaspis

message: In this article, in the species chart, the geographic ranges of the various species of the genus Atractaspis are well described. However, in the corresponding 18 WP articles for the individual species, the geographic ranges are vague, usually simply "endemic to Africa". Those articles would benefit greatly from the transfer of these data. Unfortunately, I don't have the computer skills to do so myself. I would have to copy and type each by hand, and possibly introduce errors in doing so. Perhaps someone more adept than I would like to take on this task.
96.236.213.217 (talk) 15:58, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transfer geographic range data.
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Telecommunications/Cellular devices

message: Someone just barfed up the content at Samsung c3050; it's in really bad shape. Can anyone here fix it up? — Timneu22 ·  talk 17:12, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New article: Samsung c3050 

message: I found http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~qiangxu/paper/sigcomm11_wang.pdf
It discusses practices at some US cell phone firms
WhisperToMe (talk) 16:13, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paper on US cell phone firm practices

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support ~KvnG 15:16, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: FYI, the status of the mobile apps wikiproject is under discussion, see WT:WikiProject Apps -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 02:50, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mobile apps WikiProject

message: Is Wikipedia:WikiProject Telecommunications now our Parent Project?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jim.henderson (talk • contribs)  13:12, 28 August 2013‎ (UTC) 
:That was the outcome above... -- 65.92.182.123 (talk) 05:30, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mama
Talk:Micrelaps

message: Hello everybody! I have no access to ITIS, but according to the Reptile Database http://www.tigr.org/reptiles/ there is a fourth Micrelaps species accepted: M. tchernovi Werner, Babocsay, Carmely & Thuna, 2006. --Karsten Kohls (talk) 08:37, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's unfortunate that the ITIS website is unavailable at the moment, but that's the taxonomy we use here. Very many of these articles (including this one) also have a link to a relevant New Reptile Database (NRDB) article, but the NRDB is rather bleeding edge. By that I mean that in the past too many mistakes and inconsistencies were discovered in the NRDB's data, so we switched to using ITIS as a primary reference. In cases such as these, where new species are included in the NRDB but not yet in ITIS, we mention them in the Taxonomy section of the article. --Jwinius (talk) 12:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional species
Talk:Strategic sealift ships

message: I want to link to this article, but the current name seems a bit off, to me.  Should it be "Marine Prepositioning Ship" with 3 capital letters, or should it be "Maritime prepositioning ship" with 1.  The first could be right if it is a proper noun, as in a very official title.  If it is a generic name, it should be the latter.  But, as i see it, no way should it be Maritime Prepositioning ship" with 2 capitals.  Note, there is no wikipedia article for Maritime Prepositioning or for Maritime prepositioning.  Is anyone watching this?  doncram (talk) 02:23, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes name needs to be changed to MSC's calls it their Strategic Sealift Ships.. Article Name should be MSC Strategic Sealift Ships or Military Sealift Command Strategic Sealift Ships--MarlinespikeMate (talk) 06:32, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:17, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Does civilians number include technicians it? or exclude and technicians means sailors? --Tosaka1 (talk) 00:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Civilians means civilians, licensed mariners who will run and operate the ship. The might be civilian government employees or contractors. hwere, technicians probably means Active duty, uniformed member of the military/ Navy. Most likely communications specialists, but could also be security specialists, or technicians conducting minimal checking and maintenance of equipment stored aboard the ship. Wfoj2 (talk) 21:53, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civilians and Technicians 

message: Some sources are not relevant to what is cited. The other citations are clear on the ships that are used, and what category they fall into. This needs to be updated and the citations proof read.--MarlinespikeMate (talk) 06:54, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs work 

message: Kocak class vessels are no longer part of PM3, they are now PM5. Not part of either MPSRON.  Mueller921 (talk) 01:33, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kocak class
Talk:Battle of Johnstown

message: I'm thinking that the cross in the infobox is not applicable to this article.  The reason is the infobox covers just the Battle of Johnstown, but Butler died several days later in a skirmish at a different location.  I thought to gain consensus before any removal, though. Otumba (talk) 18:23, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't mean to overstep, but I've removed the cross.  I did this because I opened this proposal a month ago, and alerted the main editor of the article, and there has been no response (main editor has been inactive for a few weeks now).  If anyone disagrees with my deletion, please do undo and if it is ok please could you leave a message explaining your rationale. Otumba (talk) 19:43, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I go through periods where I can't be too active - real world related. The change is fine with me, it certainly is more accurate to remove the cross. Geraldk (talk) 18:32, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The cross by Butler in the infobox 

message: This is nicely done--I was looking at it because I've been researching the NH Line regiments, and had been going through the pension records on Footnote.com for the officers.  I found that Capt David McGregore of the 2nd NH regiment claimed to have been at the Battle of Johnstown.  The 2nd NH regiment (minus two light infantry companies) was garrisoned at West Point at the time.  Any ideas as to how that could have been possible? Thanks Cfrye66 (talk) 00:39, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continental troops involved? 

message: The only source given for this article is a book by Berry which I have not been able to locate. There are no references for specific facts, just the same reference at the end of each paragraph. 
Also, I have no reason to doubt the scholarship, but I know that Trafford publishing was a self-publishing house. Consequently, the article badly needs additional sources. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 01:23, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  single source’