Talk:Pharmaceutical industry in India

message: In my opinion, the author of this page has forgotten to mention Cipla as an Indian Pharmaceutical Company. According to scrips 100, Cipla ranks 60, above Lupin and Dr. Reddy's which are ranked 66 and 72 respectively. Scrip100.com  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nihar 25292 (talk • contribs) 14:58, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The validation of the Page: Pharmaceutical industry in India 

message: I am not aware as what to do in this case.
The following link (which has reference number two at the time) is broken. Thanks. --Abhijeet Safai (talk) 10:54, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Even if these links worked they are not appropriate to cite by Wikipedia guidelines at WP:RS. Information from press releases or company reports about themselves are not the kind of articles to cite. It is better to use research papers from a third party, like from an academic journal or book written by a scholar.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 11:44, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The broken link 

message: http://chemicals.nic.in/npp_circulation_latest.pdf This is the link where relevant document can be found. --Abhijeet Safai (talk) 09:03, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new section 'Pharmaceutical policy of India'  can be added  

message: http://www.ibef.org/industry/pharmaceutical-india.aspx --Abhijeet Safai (talk) 07:11, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  References for editors interested in improving this article 

message: Substituted at 02:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Pharmaceutical industry in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131214113109/http://www.pwc.in/assets/pdfs/pharma/PwC-CII-pharma-Summit-Report-22Nov.pdf to https://www.pwc.in/assets/pdfs/pharma/PwC-CII-pharma-Summit-Report-22Nov.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100430232700/http://www.ircc.iitb.ac.in/IPcourse/patent.html to http://www.ircc.iitb.ac.in/IPcourse/patent.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120105082619/http://www.cci.in/pdf/surveys_reports/indian-pharmaceuticals-industry.pdf to http://www.cci.in/pdf/surveys_reports/indian-pharmaceuticals-industry.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120105080622/http://www.cci.in/pdf/surveys_reports/indias_pharmaceutical_industry.pdf to http://www.cci.in/pdf/surveys_reports/indias_pharmaceutical_industry.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://invest.telangana.gov.in/pharma/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:13, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: When I initially came across this page, the "criticism" subsection was very subjective. Therefore I added a tag disputing the neutrality of the page. Now that I have deleted the opinionated statements and added more factual evidence with citations, I propose that we can remove this tag. Any thoughts? Coffeeking123 (talk) 01:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the tag can be removed now. Rvsingh12 (talk) 21:34, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the "Neutrality of this Article is Disputed" Tag