lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Combined Nomenclature

message: this page makes no freaking sence whatsoever! it's "mumbojumbosynergisetheenterprise leveraging our hightdetailedbackserverplanes" speak!
did someone just copy/paste the text from the EU guidelines? wtf. Project2501a  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.218.54.26 (talk) 23:07, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: No freaking sence
Talk:Buddhism in Bhutan

message: Moving here a comment originally provided by User:74.180.18.108:
:Can someone fix the discrepancy? Here it says "98% of Bhutan's population is Buddhist," but on the Bhutan page under 'Demographics' there is a bar graph that shows Buddhism makes up 75%, Hinduism 24%, and other is 1%. Obviously, both of these claims can't be true....
— Alan✉ 17:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  discrepancy 
Talk:RTP3

message: I have a Lung cancer victim in IPO in Porto, he is an American citizen, very complicated situation , been in the Hospital to be treated over 6 weeks ago. Caught some bacteria in the hospital,  the hospital staff does not know what to do. Like it something new??? 69.125.124.255 (talk) 23:21, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do I talk to you
Talk:Lightweight Access Point Protocol

message: I'm studying the CCNP BCMSN course and LWAPP is not the control protocol it is a tunneling method/protocol to allow the LAP's to connect to the WLC's.  The Cisco Wireless Control System (WCS) is the name of the server application presenting a GUI to cover the functions mentioned in this article.
Comments?
::Well, I'm currently not studying CCNP, but I was currently sniffing the traffic, between APs and WLC, and while it also provides the tunneling as you said, it is also used to control the APs.
::It seems like almost all (or all?) communication between WLC and AP is through that protocol. So I think the "control" is a right term. 131.179.144.190 (talk) 20:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this is old, but lol: "it's not a control protocol, it's a protocol to allow communication with the controller". Think about that for a moment.... --173.252.44.52 (talk) 04:47, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Jasper Peak

message: There is no summit named Chester anything in the GNIS database. See . This might be a alternate name for [] which is located three miles east of Tower, Minnesota as , cited in the article.  –droll [chat] 09:35, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: See . Which confirms that Jasper peak was an alternate name for Chester Peak in 1890.  –droll [chat] 09:39, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Might be a variant name of Jasper Peak
Talk:Mount Northrop

message: While this almost 100-year old source describes a Mount Northrop, I can't find any contemporary source which names it. Perhaps Mount Northrop has been renamed?– Gilliam (talk) 06:09, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Just for a kick I've submitted a request to the U.S. Board on Geographic Names for this. I found a few references to the name and location from back in the late 1800s/early 1900s but it seems to have disappeared after that. I'll post here if I get a response. Nsteffel (talk) 23:55, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name?
Talk:List of Heckler & Koch products

message: I have deleted a couple of citations to HKPRO.com. It is not a reliable source for Wikipedia articles because its articles are anonymously posted and there's no discernible editorial review process. See WP:V for general rules, and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Firearms#HKPRO/ hkpro.com for a specific discussion of this source.  Rezin (talk) 23:55, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  HKPRO 
Talk:Aasmah Mir

message: I don't think Aasmah Mir presents the Weekend News anymore. She presents the Lunchtime News on Five Live, which is on 12noon-1pm weekdays. --Kateab 21:48, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Glossary of military abbreviations

message: I noticed French and German terms on this list—am I right in assuming these abbreviations are used by English-speaking military? It would be helpful to clarify this in the article if possible. --Pythagimedes (talk) 21:36, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question re: French, German, etc abbreviations 

message: What is the abbrevation for brigade? 130.235.24.38 (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brigade
Talk:Aniconism in Buddhism

message: This needs lots and lots – what statues represent, which statues are used, deity meditation etc. Secretlondon (talk) 04:35, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

message: The subject of the image is now referenced on the image file.  It is important to be careful in distinguishing, as Huntington is, sometimes anyway, between the argument that describing the early phase of Buddhist art as "the aniconic period" or similar phrases is incorrect, and arguing that there were no aniconic images. Johnbod (talk) 05:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mara pic 

message: In the second paragraph both the words "boddhisattva" and "boddhisattava" appear. Is this a typo? 187.111.234.39 (talk) 22:22, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible typo
Talk:Fegyver- és Gépgyár

message: FEG is credited with making an extensive line of air rifles and pistols, many of which have been sold under various brand-names including Relum, Telly (often misinterpreted as Jelly, due to the font on the logo,) Grothaus, and Neckermann.  JS144man (talk) 18:56, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Dhauli

message: Note:  Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 07:26, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Orissa Addition 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI!  22:40, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: Uvycyd tu CV is ct CV 59.89.214.67 (talk) 17:05, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social science
Talk:SOE

message: SOE: Standard operating Environment  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 20.139.67.50 (talk) 04:53, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

message: State Of Emergency. SOE is being used heavily right now in online and offline discussion of Thailand's enactment of its 60-day State Of Emergency Laws. 203.131.210.82 (talk) 09:50, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add this?
Talk:Sacha Sacket

message: Does anyone have a public domain photo of this guy? It'd surely be nice. 211.232.214.165 22:01, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo?

message: Large portions of this article had been taken directly from the biography at the subject's official site. For reasons of copyright, this material had to be removed. Please feel free to rewrite these sections in accordance with Wikipedia policies. Thanks. --Metropolitan90 06:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually deleting copyright material is what we're suppose to do. There's no reason you can't use that same material and rewrite in your own words. Even a few sentences is a start. Benjiboi 11:00, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree with 76.171.53.59. If you delete something substantial, you should have something to add. Leaving the page blank just looks rather tacky. Yakkowackdot (talk) 16:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Such is wikilife. Deletionists are within their right to delete material just as inclusionists have the right to add material. Use the history revisions and see what was deleted, rewrite it to avoid copyright and move on. It's usually easier to simply fix it yourself then compell someone to do something their not into. If you really feel Metropolitan90 has some obligation to re-add material, which I don't, then talk to them directly. Benjiboi 19:15, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of copyrighted material
Talk:Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Protection Act of 2007

message: Does the bill not include a general provision prohibiting large capacity magazines (including for semi-automatic pistols)?  If so, this would seem to be a significant departure from the previous assault weapons ban bill and should be noted here.  --Holdek (talk) 03:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Large capacity magazines

message: The 1994-2004 Assault Weapon Ban did indeed restrict detachable magazine size to ten rounds maximum for civilian sales and over ten eounds for "Military/Law Enforcement/Export Only". (Magazines over ten rounds made prior to the ban were "grandfathered" and could be legally possessed.) During the now defunct 1994-2004 AWB, I aided a reserve deputy zero his carry weapon at the range: he was limited to a ten-shot magazine by the AWB. I could not understand how the ban enhanced officer safety at all. Academic studies by CDC 2003 and NAS 2004 could find no measurable benefit from the AWB either.
A strict reading of US v. Miller 1939 is that the Second Amendment would specifically protect military arms that the "unorganized militia" (persons eligible for military service but not enrolled) would be expected to have familiarity with and would have a right (or even duty) to possess if they chose.  The "sporting purpose" test was introduced with the 1968 Gun Control Act. Congress if it wanted to could ban black fountain pens with gold trim; that does not mean such a ban would serve a useful purpose. Naaman Brown (talk) 11:24, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: AWB criticism
Talk:Lao Buddhist sculpture

message: I was surprised the Gold Buddha of Bangkok isn't mentioned anywhere in the article. Its cast in gold, and was hidden inside a plaster coating. It was accidentally rediscovered sometime in the 20th century. Anybody else heard of this? --98.232.180.37 (talk) 08:11, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: World's largest solid gold religious item
Talk:U Thong Style

message: I added some information and a reference from Britanica (before there was no reference).  However, the Britanica reference states that the U Thong style began in the 14th century.  Before I added anything, the wikipedia article stated:
"There are three distinct periods for the style, 12th to 13th century, 13th to 14th century and 13th to the 15th century, with some obvious overlap."
So perhaps the other 2 distinct periods mentioned in the original article were the Sukhothai and Lion styles?Editfromwithout (talk) 03:32, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction
Talk:Wat Phumin

message: The local (non-canonical) jataka that is the subject of the murals at Wat Phumin is called คัทธนกุมารชาดก  rather than คันทกุมารชาดก (a canonical story and quite different).  This confusion is wide-spread, even in the Thai language websites.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.172.54.161 (talk) 01:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion over name of the jataka
Talk:Herbert Dingle/Archive 7

message: Dingle asserted that the two twins would have the same age at the the reunion of the twins. Here is the proof. The conclusion of twin paradox is false. According to time dilation of special relativity, the time interval between ticks of a clock (seconds) is dilated by the factor beta. The twin paradox claims the number of ticks recorded by the travelling clock is reduced by the factor 1/beta times the time recorded by the earth clock T. Hence we have that the true elapsed time for the astronaut twin is the time on the earth clock T times the dilation factor of the second, the interval between ticks, times the reduction in the number of ticks or seconds on the astronaut clock. Therefore the elapsed time for the astronaut twin is: beta times 1/beta times T or just simply T. Therefore T=T and the two times are equal. Hence there is no difference in age of the twins when the astronaut returns from his space journey. QED Electrodynamicist 12:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It amuses me that you argue so strenuously against something which has not only been mathematically proven to follow from the theory, but which has also been experimentally verified.  But anyway: this is clearly OR, and this talk page is not the place to discuss pet theories or create original proofs.  If you don't provide a source showing where the above proof has been published or accepted, I'm nuking this section.  --Starwed 00:23, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Swanzsteve - The issue here is WP:NOR not whether relativity is correct or not.  If this is a new proof by Electrodynamicist, then its presense is just as appropriate as my presenting my "flat backtgrond general relativity" theory here.  However, I am willing to let Electrodynamicist blow off his steam, but do advise that he put this on USENET and see what happens to it.  I also advice that Electrodynamicist remove this thread should he become convinced that it is in error. --EMS | Talk 20:25, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

text: *Shrug*.  I could rebut you, but this is all irrelevant to the issue that the initial statement is inadmissible in Wikipedia without being supported by a citation from a reliable source. --EMS | Talk 03:54, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proof That Herbert Dingle Was Correct
Talk:Nintendo S-SMP

message: Perhaps there are some non copyrighted images that could be inserted into this article of the SPC700
:Well would be nice Richardson j 04:55, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would if Nintendo didnt use those silly safety screws. I cant open my SNES. 90.231.19.14 (talk) 13:35, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

text: A picture is available here 84.182.52.51 (talk) 09:39, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures?
Talk:Drum GAC

message: The result was: Topic is notable. --B. Wolterding 15:30, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is basicly a fundamental failure to under stand the GAA. All clubs are amateur. This club has provide numerous players to Derry GAA which should be added to the article  and played in Derry senior football final a good few times,(Gnevin 19:47, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Yeah as Gnevin says all GAA teams are amatuer, and yet the GAA is the biggest sport in Ireland, so the amateur excuse can't really be used. Clubs such as these are notable and important because club football plays a massive role in the lives of people from County Derry (and Ireland as a whole). Games including these clubs are very well attended. Derry Boi 21:02, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert review 

message: At the time of writing this page has Category links with identical content. A proposal to delete categories relating to the GAA that use "Londonderry" (the name of the former administrative county) rather than "Derry" (the name of the GAA county) is under discussion. If you wish to contribute, follow the link from the "Londonderry" category. Brocach (talk) 10:02, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Category duplication
Talk:Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

message: Obviously Adam Smith is not relevant to the provision. Pls remove. --Rebestein (talk) 14:20, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance 

message: First, it reads like a book chapter; I don't have the book quoted at hand but I fear there might be some direct copy/paste involved. Further, within the exemptions it ought to be mentioned that the Commission has provided guidelines for horizontal co-operation agreements. These guidelines define under which circumstances exemptions are to be accepted. The guidelines are to be found from the Commission's competition homepage and use citation 2011/C 11/01 with a complete title of the guidelines being: "Guidelines on the applicability of Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to horizontal co-operation agreements".
--86.50.88.255 (talk) 10:26, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exemptions
Talk:Tesla: Man Out of Time

message: This entry was for a 2001 ed., not the 1981 original, nor the latest ?2013? ed.   The Worldcat link has a list of all editions.   Cover image is still the 2001 ed., I'll try to find a 1981 version.  205.175.106.39 (talk) 22:13, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed to 1st Ed. 

message: Is there any chance that this article will meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for books WP:NB? Billlion (talk) 10:04, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly there are some reviews in descent sources eg  also American Scientist etc. Billlion (talk) 10:08, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Remington Model 7600

message: I have contacted someone to ask about obtaining permission to use an image for this article.  Kartano (talk) 03:28, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  December 2009 

message: I have contacted someone ELSE asking for permission to use an image of the Remington 7600.  Hopefully I will hear from them soon.  Kartano (talk) 08:21, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, permission was denied from the photo's owner.  Kartano (talk) 22:04, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  September 2010 

message: This article should be renamed or moved to Remington Model 7600  which is the correct naming convention for this firearm and has been categorized as such. DeusImperator (talk) 16:24, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is incorrectly named
Talk:Associated American Artists

message: We've got very precise coordinates of a spot on the south side of 57th St, halfway between 5th & 6th Aves. Our words are much vaguer. "Madison Avenue" and "Fifth Avenue" and no cross street. Is there any source with street address or similarly precise location? Jim.henderson (talk) 21:19, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coords
Talk:Coandă-1910

message: User:MilborneOne Okay, WHY did you delete it? Was there any reason whatsoever? Any good, real reason? Romanian-and-proud (talk) 18:19, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I know I have never edited this article. MilborneOne (talk) 18:45, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is for comment and improvement of the related article Coandă-1910 so your question is not relevant here. MilborneOne (talk) 18:58, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caondă 1910 

message: I have read the discussions here and added an edit notice and some hidden text to the article. See if that makes any difference. --John (talk) 22:10, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit notice etc 

message: In the Memorials and models section, it mentions a 10-leu coin and a price of 220 leu. In Romanian, leu is singular and lei is plural. The correct usage should be a 10-lei coin at a price of 220 lei. Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.95.1.11 (talk) 12:12, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: , it now says lei. Thanks for the correction. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:32, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request
Talk:Ayyavazhi phenomenology

message: Paragraphs like 
Though the Ayyavazhi's and its worship centers accept those in Akilam as the guideline to be followed, there is a considerable misunderstandings and inclusions in the socio-religious society of Ayyavazhi. Many practices, rituals and ideas are phenomenologically adapted from the pre-existing traditions which in turn counters the teachings of Akilam.
and 
Akilam especially the second part clearly provides rich ideas in quantity and quality about the uniqueness and supremacy of Vaikundar and his power-relation to other lesser gods. But many followers relates Vaikundar to Vishnu and as merely the incarnation of him.
seem to violate WP:SOAPBOX or WP:FORUM. I do not know enough [anything] about Ayyavazhi to help clean up, but a clean up is needed! 
JosiahHenderson (talk) 13:34, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Anathapindika

message: Where is the glossary for the abbreviations used in this article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.201.163.102 (talk) 14:02, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification 

message: HOW THE HECK IS THIS ARTICLE RATED B CLASS?! 
Also, major edits needed. Ill try to work on cleaning this page up later. Anathapindika is a fairly important person in Buddhism. Wikiman5676 (talk) 07:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and downgraded as we speak.--Farang Rak Tham (talk) 08:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  In fairness to the previous editors, it should be stated here that the previous content that has now been blanked did not constitute any form of copyright infringement, as the content was copied from a source that is in public domain, that is the Dictionary of Pali Proper Names by Malalasekera. However, there were serious issues with the organization of the text as  already pointed out.--Farang Rak Tham (talk) 15:10, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  quality 

message: MMW: [ piNDada ]3[ p'iNDa-da ] mf ( [ A ] ) ii. offering or qualified to offer oblations to deceased ancestors Yājñ. MBh. J 37.48.24.49 (talk) 05:28, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  piṇḍada meaning
Talk:Pankrti

message: They had only 5 studio albums, rest are compilations, singles, EP-s, live albums, check on Serbian Wikipedia article.--Obelixus (talk) 02:19, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kasa (hat)

message: I'm no expert at Japanese, but I believe that gasa is a form of the word kasa when used in compound words: like jingasa = jin (iron) + kasa (hat).  Aidan Blackthorn (talk) 00:18, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: samurais used kabuto, not jingasa. on a battle field ashigaru could be easiliy recognised by using jingasa instead of kabuto (Idot (talk) 05:47, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  jingasa
Talk:KKND2: Krossfire

message: I deleted the part "New ideas in gaming" since it was a 1:1 copy from the Melbourne House website. Even if this company is now dedunct, it is not legal to copy the text since the copyright is still being held by someone. --Mauritanian Icebreaker 22:37, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

message: "However, die-hard fans have created several mods for games such as Total Annihilation to simulate a "KKnD 3" game." <-- I doubt the reality of this statement, since Total Annihilation was released in 1997, where as KKnD2, according to this article, was created in 1998  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.220.144.27 (talk) 05:10, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Total Annihilation
Talk:Gnosticism and Buddhism

message: This topic was pulled from the Buddhism and Christianity page.  This style of hatch editing, probably based on religious prefrence, is what makes wiki a half-rated source.
Wiki could be excellent if editors would have to argue their case in a reasonable fassion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.117.89.159 (talk) 03:52, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:RCTV International

message: The article says that both Radio Caracas Televisión RCTV, C.A. and Empresas 1BC are the parent company. The RCTV, C.A. article says its parent is 1BC. This needs to be clarified: is 1BC parent, grand-parent or what? JRSP 22:40, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Two parents?
Talk:Elizabeth Armistead

message: The authoritative ODNB calls her Armitstead, not Armistead. I haven't looked further than that, but I think this article should probably be moved. (The issue is slightly complicated by the fact that Elizabeth Armitstead already exists as a redirect to the cyclist Lizzie Armitstead, but there are obviously ways to fix that.) Comments? -GrindtXX (talk) 18:34, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armitstead/Armistead