Talk:Legendary (video game)

message: Gamefly lists the release date for this game as September 11th, 2008. 98.21.76.15 (talk) 22:11, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No UK/Europe release date, looking at Play.com they are stating 7th Nov for UK. I know its not a reliable source. Will check for a better source later unless someone else wants to look. Dark verdant (talk) 13:04, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release Date 

message: The reviews need to remain unbiased. Although there are many negative reviews, positive reviews do exist so they need to be included. The fact that the reviews are typically unfavorable was underscored.
X NorAxeR X (talk) 16:35, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I know we want to patch this issue up and we both know we're on good terms so hopefully this can also be cleared so here we go again lol: I was soon to write up a good enough reception section (thats kind of my "thing" on wiki and thus far have done it well) for this article then maybe even move onto other aspects, however Gruber I must question something. You correctly made an argument against positive weight being near that of cons when you mentioned 19 being 50% or less, this I would assume being from the 360 version at Metacritic, it having the more reviews than the PC and PS3. HOWEVER I'm not sure that would mean negative outweighed it as you yourself have listed the average being "generally negative" due to what it says on Metacritic, but 50% is not negative according to them and so would make the ratio the following 14 bad, 15 mixed, 4 good so that would not really make it "mostly negative" (I mean upon reading the 50%s, they're no way near as negative as those listed as such and do present "mixed"). To sum it up I would have it one paragraph on cons, one paragraph on "possible good thing yet hindered by this and that" and a sentence or two on good, that comes around as 60% entirely negative, thus being balance yet highlighting the negative reception. Stabby Joe (talk) 03:02, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews Dispute 

message: I don't especially think that this is the place for carefully crafted quotes. These quotes are all skewed in the game's favor, so they have no business in a bi-partisan article. Not saying this game is bad or anything, it's just not the place to preach about how good it is.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monomij (talk • contribs) 03:06, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-release Quotes 

message: There needs to be some clarification (as well as references) for the following: "The First being a passive, only attacking out of defense. The second phase is where they attack when attacked"  Both statements basically say the same thing.  So, if the information is accurate from whatever source didn't make it into the article, how do these differ?  If you have the source, please add it. ~QuasiAbstract {talk/contrib} 09:40, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification 

message: so some fool thought it was unimportant to keep the creature list so now the list is there with one single creature? wow! So whoever said that censorship was a valid form of editing on wikipedia? I'm sure everyone would MUCH RATHER come on wikipedia and find TOO much information than NOT nearly ENOUGH!
as for the debate about reviews, I agree that the page needs to list posative and negative reviews equally. I for one know this game is completely great and awesome. I can only explain the poor reviews it has as some kind of conspiracy where the publishers didn't bribe the reviewers, or perhaps managed to annoy or anger them some how . The page should point out that a free DEMO of the game is currently available on xbox live and invite anyone to download the free demo and review the game for THEMSELVES!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gawdsmak (talk • contribs) 10:17, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the game just sucks, and Wikipedia is not a game guide. Herr Gruber (talk) 18:59, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  why would anyone remove the creature list 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Legendary (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090210195906/http://x360magazine.com:80/games/legendary/legendary.html to http://x360magazine.com/games/legendary/legendary.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:07, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified