lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Schwäbisch Gmünd

message: This article should not be merged as it is not the same. Just goes to show how much people know... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.192.196.94 (talk • contribs) .
:I put that merge tag. Why should this not be the same city? Gmund and Schwäbisch Gmünd both claim to be 50km east of Stuttgart, and the rest of the article suggests it is the same city. Of course Gmund is not Gmünd if that is your concern. Kusma (討論) 00:37, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was suggesting to merge the content of Gmund to this article (since it was about the same city), and keep the title, of course. However, since there is not much to merge on Gmund anyway, I have just made a redirect from Gmund to Gmünd, and will add a notice about Schwäbisch Gmünd there. Kusma (討論) 06:46, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I think a photo should be added of the golden fountain of the Blessed Virgin Mary in the town square. I also think the town legend of the fiddler who recieved the golden slippers from the Madonna (Virgin Mary.. hence the fountain) should be added to the article. --Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 19:54, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mary fountain & Legend of the Fiddler

message: What does Gmünd mean??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.3.31.217 (talk) 09:31, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Gmünd (also: -gmünd, -gmund, Gmund)normally means "mouth of a river" from the german vocable "Mündung". But I don't have any source here in my house, to look up. 92.229.43.166 (talk) 07:48, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Gmünd

message: army base in Schwabish Gmund,Bismark Kaserne 1983 a kid died in the aid station due to gas from a stove. we used to call him little Mack.≈≈≈≈  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:A000:9B03:1600:8897:52CD:5A85:D55B (talk) 21:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  death of a child on Bismark Kaserne 1982-1983 
Talk:Tag 26

message: the second quoted external website (http://www.6degreesfilm.com/features/HorrorShorts.htm) quotes it as a film about a nuclear disaster as opposed to a biological one, however http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0350182/ quotes it being a biological disaster. You aren't actually told in the film, I suppose the answer is either in finding someone with enough knowledge of radiation or biological protective suits, or emailing the director :|     Fegor 00:30, 5 February 2006
It is not told, whether A or B or C. It' just it. 84.191.25.167 22:49, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

message: why are we not including the youtube clip? it is very relevant! but I don't know what wikipedia's policy is on linking to Youtube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbM4jhRJFPU
Fegor 13:05, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  the youtube clip
Talk:Michael Oliver (real estate)

message: It is not appropriate to label anyone as an “immigrant” except in-so-far as it is made clear whither he is an immigrant (and it would be good to know whence as well). —SlamDiego 10:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  “immigrant” 

message: Since the article had no references (other than the list of ELs), I've converted it to a redirect to Phoenix Foundation. – S. Rich (talk) 15:48, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced article -- [[WP:BLAR]] to Phoenix Foundation
Talk:List of characters from Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem

message: I'm adding in a link to Charlemagne in Anthony's section.  The game makes enough notes in its description of the man, of the political environment of the time, and of the year Anthony's section takes place (the year of Charlemagne's death), that it's pretty clear the Charlemagne referenced here is supposed to be the real one. Arrowned 08:29, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charlemagne 

message: Come on guys. I've been hearing this rumour everywhere, and it seems to be taken as a fact.
But nowhere have I been able to find Dyack mentioning anything about a yellow or fifth Ancient.
Someone mentioned that he said something about it on the IGN forums, so I'm going to check there next.
I'm going to keep looking for a fortnight. If I haven't found anything by then, I'm just going to delete the whole yellow ancient paragraph, unless someone gives me a good reason not to. General kaiden 13:26, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yellow Ancient???
Talk:Ulster Army Council

message: I have posted a alternative version of this article in the tempory page space.--Padraig3uk 00:37, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Does anyone check these articles after they have been tagged, this article was tagged on the 24th Jan and I posted an alternative article on the 5th of Feb, and its now the 19th of Feb and the article is still taggged.  So what is the situation can I now remove the tag and move my alternative article to the main article page.--Padraig3uk 08:03, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nicotiana benthamiana

message: You spelled Australia wrong.
:N. benthamiana is emerging as a model due to the complexity of its genome compared to Arabidopsis, yet the organism is still very small and easy to work with. As such, it is gaining popularity in the scientific community over N. tabacum as a model for more complex plant species.  There is a recently published draft genome available at http://solgenomics.net/organism/Nicotiana_benthamiana/genome for browsing, BLAST, etc.  Additionally, more of a technicality note: ethylene is a gaseous hormone, so "secretion" is an inaccurate description; secretion refers specifically to exocytosis-mediated expulsion of aqueous molecules, proteins, or particles.  Ethylene is a non-polar gas, and can easily diffuse throughout the cytoplasm and across the plasma membrane into apoplastic space and the atmosphere,so does not require secretion. 
:--69.166.47.139 (talk) 03:21, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Reference:
* https://www.newscientist.com/article/2348568-genetically-modified-tobacco-plant-produces-cocaine-in-its-leaves/
* https://www.techtimes.com/articles/283977/20221125/this-genetically-modified-tobacco-plant-can-produce-cocaine-with-its-leaves-how.htm
See also:
* https://www.uchicagomedicine.org/forefront/news/nicotine-and-cocaine-leave-similar-mark-on-brain-after-first-contact
Ernsts (talk) 16:37, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genetically modified ''N. benthamiana'' produces [[cocaine]]
Talk:Lonnie Frisbee

message: I have added a couple of paragraphs from Frisbee's autobiography.  In the interest of keeping the paragraphs compact, I have had to use ellipsis.  Should anyone question my veracity of accurately transcribing Frisbee's intent, I will be glad to provide full sections on this page.
Also, its been over a decade since I have done an edit.  If I have made mistakes, let me know, and I will re-edit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkSonntag (talk • contribs) 02:44, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information from new source 

message: It says he struggled with homosexuality. He didn’t struggle with homosexuality – he was a homosexual who struggled to accept himself. 64.253.212.108 (talk) 12:51, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction 

message: This sentence does not belong: . "The fact that he was gay I hope reminds gay men and women that God has no issue with sexuality. Jesus never looked down on anyone who was gay." Who said this? No citation. It's whose opinion? Whoever wrote that was editorializing and pushing their agenda. 2601:881:282:2810:C5FD:629E:A6FB:E1C8 (talk) 16:51, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: agreed. Pseudotsuga menziesii (talk) 01:07, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Also agreed, this needs to be taken out. It’s not even worded in a way that tries to sound objective, the author literally wrote “I” referring to themselves 98.225.23.18 (talk) 14:30, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion without quotes and no citation. 

message: On page 2: " Lonnie was rumored to have a wife but never did.
Further down on Page 2: He quit the art academy and moved to Novato, California, where the Heefners and Wises set up a commune and later reconnected with his former girlfriend Connie Bremer, whom he then married.
 Frisbee and his wife Connie joined the fledgling Calvary Chapel congregation and
Smith was struck by Frisbee's charisma.
on Page 4:  In 1973, the Frisbees divorced because Frisbee's pastor had an affair with his wife. Frisbee mentions this in a sermon he gave at the Vineyard Church in Denver, Colorado, a few years before he died.[2] Connie later remarried. Lonnie left the organization. Renoira (talk) 22:14, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistencies in history. 

message: This is stated as a fact in the article. The reference links to some book. 217.140.205.191 (talk) 03:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the word "purportedly" to better comply with WP:VOICE. A. Randomdude0000 (talk) 04:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "performed healings, and miracles"
Talk:Enharmonic scale

message: In this example, natural notes are sharpened by multiplying its frequency ratio by 256:243 (called a limma), and a natural note is flattened by multiplying its ratio by 243:256.  A pair of enharmonic notes are separated by a Pythagorean comma, which is equal to 531441:524288.
:Is this really relevant to enharmonic scales? It seems more of a pythagorean tuning issue. There are plenty of other enharmonics scales (i.e. meantone) that have other differences. Rainwarrior 00:43, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Irrelevant detail?

message: How about starting with a simple explanation so the layman that is looking for a simple explanation will have one and then go in more complex analysis that a mathematician may be looking for. Here it is in 3 lines:
An enharmonic note is a note that when written on sheet is different but when played is the same, for example: F sharp and G flat, or A sharp and B flat. An enharmonic scale is the same, a scale that looks different on paper but is the same when played: E flat major and D sharp major.
:I don't think that's true -- looks to me like the enharmonic scale is a whole different thing, and people have started to call scales enharmonic incorrectly. See http://music-theory.ascensionsounds.com/who-really-understands-musical-enharmonics/ and http://www.musicofyesterday.com/history/8002324/The_Greek_Octave_System.php
-- Jo3sampl (talk) 22:29, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: These are not enharmonic scales. In fact, in an enharmonic scale E-flat and D-sharp are two different notes. Double sharp (talk) 15:37, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Who is the audience?

message: The C flat, E sharp, F flat and B sharp notes are missing from the chart. Why is this..? Käkki2 (talk) 17:01, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the chart, sharps and flats raise and lower notes by two steps on the chart. So C = A, E = G, F = D and B = D. Double sharp (talk) 15:35, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing notes

message: http://music-theory.ascensionsounds.com/who-really-understands-musical-enharmonics/
http://www.musicofyesterday.com/history/8002324/The_Greek_Octave_System.php
"Enharmonic scale" does not mean "the same scale spelled differently" -- careful!
-- Jo3sampl (talk) 22:33, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs supporting the 20121129 edit
Talk:Anaconda (poker)

message: Is there a reference for this article?  It's always been my understanding that each player gets 7 cards in Anaconda.  Perhaps this is a variant? – Doug Bell talk•contrib 00:45, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Note also that the discussion in Draw poker#Anaconda ("Pass the trash") claims that 7 cards are dealt. —Doug Bell talk 20:09, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment
Talk:Bruce Brown (director)

message: Quote box
align=center
quote=Authenticity check: A search reveals that the phrase "regarded by many" appears in the text. Is the phrase a symptom of a dubious statement? Could a source be quoted instead? Perhaps the "many" could be identified? Might text be edited to more genuinely reflect specific facts?
source=Wetman—Preceding undated comment added 00:47, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 04:43, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 February 2022
Talk:Home Run Baker

message: So, how many home runs did "Home Run" Baker hit?  I believe it was laughably small, compared to the Babe Ruth era that followed.  Please tell us. 68.164.171.39 08:55, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: this article should really be named Frank Baker. Kingturtle (talk) 18:27, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  article name 
Category talk:HGTV original programming

message: hangon This may have a good use, may be tmie for a list to grow in to a cat, checking. xaosflux Talk/CVU 00:53, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This was up for CSD as being empty, I've added all of the articles from lists that exist to this cat now.  It is no longer empty. xaosflux Talk/CVU 00:58, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Etymological twins

message: The reason I removed
  Calvinism and Chauvinism (Chauvin is French for Calvin)
is that this isn't really appropriate in the sense of etymological twins.  These are two different philosphies named after two completely different people.  The fact that their names have a similar etymological source is not relevant, as far as I can see.
:Yeah, it is irrelevant in every other discussion, but isn't that what makes them a good example of etymological twins?  The fact that they have a "similar etymological source", as you say, making them etymological but not semantic twins, is what creates the irony.  In my view, etymological twins merit their own article (distinct from Cognate) only if we can come up with funny examples like this one.  It seems justified to me, since etymonline is a respected source oft-cited in Wikipedia, though perhaps some more googling is called for.  What do you think?Adam Mathias 01:29, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I still think (Calvinism/Chauvinism) is a big stretch, and here's why:  if two different philosophies had arised, one called Xism and one called Yism, and the words X and Y were etymological twins, with similar meanings, and the reasons those philosophies were named had something to do with the meaning of those words, then it would be appropriate.  But Calvinism and Chauvinism are of course not named  on the meaning of the roots. So the derivational tree of the meanings has been in some sense cut.  Although I concede that  certainly claims they are. --Deville (Talk) 04:00, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  removal of Calvinism 

message: ::Also, what do you (or anybody else) think about a merge w/ doublet (linguistics) - Adam Mathias 01:39, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As for the connection with doublet, I agree, and in fact I don't see what the difference is between etymological twin and doublet at all.  These two articles are really pretty much about the same thing.  (I see no need to point out the coincidence that these two articles are twins with respect to the Wikipedia hierarchy in exactly the same manner that doublets are twins with respect to linguistic meaning :-D )  Should we merge them? --Deville (Talk) 04:00, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: About the merge, I think it should be planned/coordinated, so I guess we should use the merge template on both pages that gives people who frequent the other time to say their piece about yes/no and whether etymological twins should redir to doublet (linguistics) or the other way around.  I'll do that now. Adam Mathias 04:59, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. You can go fix it up if you like. --Damian Yerrick (☎) 22:52, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to doublet
Talk:La Princesse de Clèves

message: Instead of just the Telegraph article, there should be more sourcing. There are a variety of viewpoints from various newspapers on both sides of the political spectrum. Also, his public statement was much more sophisticated, in fact you could argue the controversy was a little overblown.  Lugevas (talk) 18:19, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sarkozy controversy needs better sourcing 
Talk:Carlos Hank González

message: Wildly different note, but I hesitate to edit the page at all until the other discussion is resolved. Is there a reason why we have an embeded link for Operation White Tiger in the Criminal Allegations section that leads to this article? TrayectosEnElMundo (talk) 01:59, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation White Tiger link
Talk:Super Mario Land

message: There were Mario games on the Game & Watch handheld consoles. 167.57.216.164 (talk) 23:01, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That is true. But those are generally not counted with game releases, although maybe they should be, they are technically electronic game toys, as they essentially existed at a time when Nintendo didn't sell games by the cartridge, although there were Ataris at the time. Anyway, let's see. I added it  though it needs a good source in the body and some information about Nintendo's handheld strategy relative to G&W. Some info could be found in the various books about the time such as Game Over (Sheff book) Andre🚐 23:24, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  It’s incorrect to say this is Mario’s first handheld game
Talk:Gabriel Nassif

message: :Corrected the sentence. Fluorhydric 00:21, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I believe the following statement violates the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view:
He won the tournament, despite playing a poorly built deck. 
It is a biased statememnt, without reference. What is "poorly built"? According to who? How can it be poorly built if it won a tournament? Whether or not a deck is poorly built is a matter of opinion, and thus subject to bias. Should this statement be reworded or removed? Flashstorm 22:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a POV statement without a source. I've attempted to look for a source that the deck was considered poorly built, but I haven't even found anything about the event yet. Jay32183 23:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So, perhaps should it be removed until such a source is found? Or a citation needed notice? I'm personally still not convinced that it doesn't violate NPOV. Flashstorm 00:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it since this is a living person. We can't have Wikipedians belittling his deck building abilities. Jay32183 00:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible NPOV violation

message: Biography section could use an update regarding Nassif's recent Pro Tour and Grand Prix wins. Creet (talk) 00:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Update
Talk:John Gielgud

message: Can we update the main photo to one of Gielgud to how he actually looked as opposed to what is there now which is a photo of a specific role where he has a particular garb and makeup applied? My suggestion:  The One I Left (talk) 23:15, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That is Gielgud towards the end of his career. He was still wonderful in the 1970s (I saw him as Spooner) but a photograph of him in his prime is preferable, which is why we chose the Much Ado one. Tim riley talk 06:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Is there a consensus on that? Honestly he looks unrecognizable in the Much Ado photo with the garb and makeup.The One I Left (talk) 11:53, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it's the lead image from the article when it was promoted to featured status after community review so, yes, there is consensus for it (though of course consensus can change). Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 12:00, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: The inbox of the actor should be added in order to let readers have a rough perspective of the actor's life. Runningman2027 (talk) 05:51, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: See earlier threads in talk archive. Discussed and rejected for the normal reasons for rejecting info-boxes for arts biographies - there's no objective way to select relevant and important information useful to the reader. Some editors feel that every article should have an info-box, whether useful or not, but that is not Wikipedia's policy. Tim riley talk 09:05, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Humbledaisy, I would like to voice my support for the Gielgud infobox. Seems empty without it, and would be nice for a quick glance of essential information. The One I Left (talk) 13:20, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think those top four paragraphs give a better rough perspective and quick glance of essential information in this good article than any info box would do.Cg2p0B0u8m (talk) 20:28, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Inbox 

message: Just following the advice give in the hidden note at the top of the article.
Is it okay to add an infobox to this page? Because, having read the prior discussion, it is clear that it is favored. Also, an infobox is present on just about every major actor's page so I don't see why this one should not have one, especially since it is a featured article. Seems quite incomplete without it. Omnis Scientia (talk) 11:43, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: See earlier discussions. No consensus to add an i-box, and no need for one. Some people want every article to have one, but that is not Wikipedia's policy. Tim riley talk 13:46, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding an infobox.
Talk:Charlie Papazian

message: Detagged authenticity and image tags. SilkTork 12:53, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Would it be appropriate to remove the tag citating a lack of citations? Fallbrews (talk) 03:01, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation tag 
Talk:The Central Park Concert

message: "It is still the largest crowd the Dave Matthews Band has played for."
Was it larger than Live 8 in Philadelpia? 68.45.76.174 20:29, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vegan (disambiguation)

message: Who calls people who drive Chevy Vegas "vegans"? I've been unable to find any evidence of this practice. ---Bennie Noakes 03:45, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nor have I. Canaen 02:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chevy Vegas

message: I've capitalised Vegan in the dietary/lifestyle sense, as both of the others also had this done. Canaen 02:36, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalisation
Category talk:Criminals by nationality

message: I propose renaming or deleting this category. I've gone into detail why on Talk:Mordechai Vanunu and Category talk:Israeli criminals. See below. Lapsed Pacifist 01:21, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: Category:Israeli criminals
A criminal is a person who has committed a crime. A person who has been convicted of one is a convict. Many criminals have never been convicts, and many convicts have never been criminals. If the category is to stay, it has to be reworded.
Lapsed Pacifist 17:17, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: From the Vanunu page:

message: Name of this category
I propose to move the category title to more accurately reflect the definition given. Suggestions welcomed.
Lapsed Pacifist 20:13, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: From the Israeli criminals talk page: