Talk:The Lost Vikings (series)

message: Why don't The Lost Vikings and The Lost Vikings II get their own seperate pages?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.113.67.17 (talk • contribs) 
:Because it's very easy to describe Lost Vikings II as "It's Lost Vikings I with two new characters and different abilities. Nifboy 04:44, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate articles

message: :Image:NorseByNorseWest.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 17:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:NorseByNorseWest.PNG

message: :Image:TheLostVikingsbox.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:TheLostVikingsbox.jpg

message: Anyone know how to edit the formatting for this so that there isn't that HUGE white space between the title for the Lost Vikings 2 section and the actual description? Alchemistmerlin (talk) 21:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems to have been fixed. I believe the whitespace probably had something to do with the infobox? Maybe this was why Lost Vikings 2 section was changed from a === to a == --Poet  Talk  14:56, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Huge White Space

message: I'm going to take the liberty of renaming "Releases" to "Video games" to put aside any thought that it could be another form of media. In other words, it just sounds better to me. Also changing the "Lost Vikings 2" category back to a subcategory. Someone switched it for some reason but left the first game a sub-cat. --Poet  Talk  14:53, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename section "releases" 

message: Please leave Lost Vikings info box at the top, if it's put with Lost Vikings 2 it creates huge white space and it's confusing, it should be at the top anyway like all other game pages are. 77.96.95.251 (talk) 12:48, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Info Box placement

message: An image used in this article, File:Lostvikings.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:33, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Lostvikings.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: So when exactly was the game shipped? GameSpot suggests the original SNES version was a 1993 release, while IGN's date is 1992. Blizzard themselves seem to support both claims, which doesn't really help. Electroguv (talk) 15:43, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Date confusion