lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Roo bars

message: Merging with bull-bars has been suggested. At first, I disagreed, but now I'm not that sure anymore. There are differences in design, legislation and reason for their use. Also, roo bars are only used in Australia, in the rest of the world they are bull bars. As said above, I'm not sure they should be merged, but then, I'm not sure they shouldn't. The jury is still out on this. If they do merge, however, roo bars should be a clearly defined concept in bull bars and roo bars should be redirected to that section to provide an explanation of them. Probell 19:12, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: *I vote merge - content of roo bars could easily be incorporated into bull bars under a new section =roo bars= and roo bars become a redirect. -- Ian ≡ talk 08:30, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

text: * 'merge with bull bars as a new section, as Ian suggested. The information in this article would have more context int the other. Dan 17:26, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

text: *I support merging these two articles. I've included a link to cowcatcher, as something that's distantly related.Tom harrison 00:06, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

message: I've done a draft rewrite of this as a merged article at Bull_bars/Rewrite. Grateful for any feedback/comment. If agreed I'd move copy it into Bull bar (ie. lose the plural) and change others to redirects. -- Ian ≡ talk 04:20, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good to me. Whytee 07:44, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Nanoelectromechanical systems

message: Seriously, while electronics may be one possible application, there are many more fundamental aspects of nanomechanical systems. This should go into the category physics as well! Akhuettel (talk) 20:34, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not just electronics, but mainly physics! 
Talk:List of delegates to the United States House of Representatives from American Samoa

message: A.U. Fuimaono was delegate at large from 1970 to 1974, and A. P. Lutali  from 1975 to 1977. They were unofficial, but deserved to be in the article.Ericl (talk) 16:43, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: the other two guys
Talk:107th United States Congress

message: Our article on Frank Murkowski says he left the senate in December 2002, which would be before the 107th congress ended. Is this true? --Golbez (talk) 08:01, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just checked the bioguide, it is:  This needs to be fixed. --Golbez (talk) 08:02, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murkowski 

message: In the infobox, the last entry on the Senate Majority states June, 2001 having a Democratic majority.  However, after the special election in Minnesota, Jean Carnahan, who posthumously filled the Senate seat of her deceased husband, Mel Carnahan, was replaced by Republican Senator Jim Talent.  This put the Republican party back in the majority.
I did not want to edit this personally, but wanted to see if there was a consensus on updating this fact for the infobox.  It is included in the main article, but seeing as the infobox updates other points in time, just wanted to mention that this is just missing in the Infobox.
--JJF, 47.155.189.33 (talk) 11:32, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  iNFOBOX
Template talk:User en-1

message: This template has been protected indefinitely in order to deal with vandalism.  For the discussion on the issue, please see Template talk:User en#Protected.  If you would like to make any changes to this template, please propose them here and an Administrator will then be able to implement them.  Thank you, Redux 19:37, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

message: en-1	This user is able to contribute with a basic level of English.
If you look at the visible spectrum it can be seen a blue-indigo-green-yellow-red pattern, which we are pretty close to. Starting color testing. -The Big X 22:14, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Visible spectrum]]
Template talk:User en-2

message: This template has been protected indefinitely in order to deal with vandalism.  For the discussion on the issue, please see Template talk:User en#Protected.  If you would like to make any changes to this template, please propose them here and an Administrator will then be able to implement them.  Thank you, Redux 19:37, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have downgraded the protection from full to semi. Angr/talk 13:55, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Done Harryboyles 09:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Cytoskeletal proteins

message: This template comes across as very human biased; it implies that only humans posses the cytoskeletal proteins listed and that only two non-human cytoskeletal proteins are known... I'm not sure what to suggest, but a simple prokaryote/eukaryote divide may me more appropriate, possibly with a subsection for mammals. - Zephyris Talk 10:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Is the issue that there are articles currently existing in Wikipedia that should be added to the template, or that the additional articles need to be created? --Arcadian (talk) 16:04, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Human Bias

message: I propose an actin-binding protein section, subdivided to spectrin family to include: spectrin, alpha-actininin, dystrophin. See http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk/family/Spectrin --kupirijo (talk) 13:59, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actin binding 

message: Hello, wouldn't it be good to add katanin and caltractin in the table? Thanks.--kupirijo (talk) 10:15, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Katanin and Caltractin
Talk:Frank's Place

message: desperate for photos here - anyone have screen shots? J. Van Meter 20:13, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why, WHY isn’t this show out on DVD.  At 22 episodes the complete show could be in one set.  While some awful shows are on DVD months after they are canceled, I am confounded as to why this gem has been ignored.
I too am amazed that this show is not out on DVD. I fondly remember it and would jump at the chance to buy it. And why isn`t it in reruns? I agree 100% with who ever wrote the above paragraph. Any one who saw the show understands. Frank Rivera 03/03/06
Could somebody figure out an address of the people who have the rights to Franks Place so us fans could write them and beg it's release?
:This blog  says Paramount owns the rights. J. Van Meter 00:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD
Talk:Rideau Canal

message: This is a commonly known 'fact' in Ottawa, I know, but is there any way we can source this? --Thaddius 13:57, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longest Skating Rink 

message: I started a section on this, using Clive Doucet's book. He is not exactly a neutral source, so it would be great to have some other sources on this. --Padraic 18:49, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "transformation" section 

message: RE: Rideau Canal#Rideaumax, compare with Panamax, Suezmax and Seawaymax. Peter Horn User talk 13:22, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rideaumax 

message: The link to the citation for malaria being the main cause of death for canal labourers is broken. 2607:9880:4317:FFBF:54A4:3C3B:62CF:373F (talk) 03:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link in reference
Talk:Hypophosphorous acid

message: I think that the debate about naming reduced phosphorus oxy acids is related to the names used for organic derivatives vs the parent.  Hypophosphorous is the parent, but compounds of the type R2P(OH)(O) are called phosphinic acids. Greenwood and Earnshaw: "Hypophosphorous acid and hypophosphites [H2PO(OH) and H2P02-] The recommended names for these compounds (phosphinic acid and phosphinates) have not yet gained wide acceptance for inorganic compounds but are generally used for organophosphorus derivatives." --Smokefoot (talk) 13:06, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: "Most chemists"?
Talk:Philip Pocock (artist)

message: thanks for your bot-editorial and bot-spellingbee help on Philip Pocock page. when will i get a purple or bronze star that shines enough to have your bot-ness remove the clean-up header note?  (unsigned comment left by an anonymous user from 84.163.219.34)
:I found the above comment on one of my user talk pages.  The bot (User:Pearle) doesn't add cleanup tags, she just refiles them by date.  User:Willmcw originally added the tag on 21 March 2005.  Any editor can add and remove such tags as they see fit. Though looking at the article now, it looks like it still needs a copy edit and additional wikification. -- Beland 20:21, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleaned up, now what. 

message: looks better, esp. the refs. all pix are commons. clean up ok?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Worldwithoneeye (talk • contribs) 12:32, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed external links, put in refs 
Talk:List of presidents pro tempore of the United States Senate

message: Why was John Langdon's PPT term broken up during the 1st Congress? --Markles 02:25, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Langdon

message: What's the basis for this?  Many other people have continued as senators after serving as President pro tempore.  (Including the ones we mention - Byrd was emeritus from 1995 to 2001, and Thurmond from 1987 to 1995, and again from 2001 to 2003.)  The same goes for Styles Bridges (1955-1961), Arthur Vandenberg (1949-1951), and Kenneth McKellar (1947-1949), just in the post-WWII era.
Is this a formal title?  If so, a citation would be in order. john k (talk) 18:35, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emeritus? 

message: I feel it would be useful if the time they were senator was added, next to the time as pro tempore. Thoughts? PrairieKid (talk) 05:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time as senator request 

message: Images should be added to the table. MB298 (talk) 04:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: In the Emeritus section ... (which is peculiar, and maybe redundant) someone wrote that no one was eligible to be President Pro Tempore from 2009-2015. 
This is false. Citation: the full list of Presidents Pro-Tempore on this page. 
& The Senate website just says tradition is to choose the most senior member of the majority party of the Senate.
I suspect the error may have been vandalism, as the information is not hard to find and those terms correlate with the Obama Administration. Dtibsyh (talk) 04:52, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2009-2015 

message: Should “pro administration” be changed to federalist? Ayunipear (talk) 14:44, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because there were no organized political parties prior to the 4th Congress. Drdpw (talk) 15:35, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should “pro administration” be changed to federalist
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Plum Canary

message: After this discussion was closed, Radiant made the following comment:
:  80% is a consensus to delete. See WP:VFU for debate. Radiant_>|< 15:53, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
If any editor honestly believes that there was a 80% consensus to delete, that is a good enough reason for me to re-open the discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plum Canary (second nomination). --Tony SidawayTalk 20:38, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Post-closing comment
Talk:Mountain goat

message: They are not native to Grand Teton National Park, and are being culled.  It would be great to address this.
Mountain Goat Management Plan EA  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhuben (talk • contribs) 13:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invasive/Pest Species? 

message: Why was this page moved? Most links point to "Mountain goat" and that appears to be the more common name. Jonathunder 20:43, 2005 September 4 (UTC)
* Support —Michael Z. 2005-09-4 21:03 Z
* Support — Knowledge Seeker দ 02:27, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
* Support as the most common name. It's not only in the Rocky mountains. Top of article should have dab to ibex or goat antelope for Eurasian wild goats.Luigizanasi 03:06, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Given that the mountain goat is only native to North America, this can't be right:  "The mountain goat is a common delicacy amongst Croatian, Macedonian and Greek cultures."--BenA 19:48, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing that out, BenA!  I took it out.  - Sasha Kopf 20:39, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek and Macedonian Food Source?

message: There are some great pictures showing climbing mountain goats. Should some of those be added to the gallery, or linked so as to reference the fact that mountain goats are well suited for climbing?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/article-1320804/Mountain-goats-climb-160ft-near-vertical-Cingino-dam.html
http://cache-04.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/8/2010/10/mountaingoatish.jpg
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1113/1465675136_fb10c2be27_o.jpg
Twipley (talk) 14:56, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  climbing mountain goats
Talk:De Beauvoir Town

message: Added pic of the square, but removed link to a separate page for the square alone. It hasn't even got a stub, and I don't know that it even needs a separate entry when this page hasn't even been filled out yet. Same with Kingsland Basin - I would suggest here that we have a stub just for 'Kingsland, London'. With the growth along the city corridor, a lot of people refer Kingsland as an area - this page could include Kingsland Basin.
Tarquin Binary 21:00, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: COME ON IS THIS A JOKE?!
ITS FRENCH, "DAY BOO-VWAH", OR AS NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKERS WHO LIVE THERE CALL IT, "DEY BOO-VWAR"
I agree!  But again, have a different pronunciation.  My parents lived in De Beauvoir Road in 1939, I went to school round the corner in Culford Road, so the name was often used among family, friends and neighbours.  Sorry I don't know the phonetic script, but can say that to my knowledge the common pronunciation was/is Der Bow-vee-yer (bow as in ribbon, not bowing down).  Emphasis on the bow.Kathie01 (talk) 22:40, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  DEE BEAVER? 

message: As the area was originally developed in the 19th Century for the Upper/Middle classes I would have thought they would have used the French pronunciation (bō-vwär' / Bow-vwar). How do Hackney Council pronounce it?  Randomdaftname 22:07, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: Improvements to the article are welcome, but they must accord with reality and not push a certain PoV. Kbthompson 18:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes

message: Given as [dē bō-vwär'] - I take it this means , .  Do locals really say /di:/, as opposed to /də/?  Why is the /də 'bi:vər/ pronunciation not mentioned here?  Is it completely out of use now?  Lfh (talk) 10:22, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation is WRONG 

message: De Beauvoir is one of several old French names that have been current in English for hundreds of years. Along with  Beaulieu and Beauchamps these names acquired anglicised pronunciations long before they were often found in written documents. Consequently Beauchamps is often pronounced Beechams, Beaulieu is usually pronounced byoo-lee, and both Beauvoir and Belvoir are often pronounced beever.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Romit3 (talk • contribs) 12:59, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 
Talk:T. Ryan Gregory

message: Vandalism from 132.183.140.204, traced to Massachusetts General Hospital, USA.
:I added a Paul D.N. Hebert page, which was outlinked here but did not exist yet. You still have a dead link for Animal Genome Size Database -- maybe just do external link instead? Evolver 21:02, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think the databases are well known enough to deserve pages in wiki, so I prepared them. 70.31.67.60 01:07, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok. Evolver 12:41, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: He's recently come out on the controversy surrounding Gary Goodyear's comments about evolution.  How should this be added to the article?
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090326.wcoevolve26/BNStory/specialComment/home  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.104.139.166 (talk) 22:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globe and Mail article he wrote 

message: Suggest removing page. Subject likely made it himself and is not particularly notable. 2600:8800:7D01:F800:49FF:9B7E:901D:8668 (talk) 11:28, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. How did this article escape speedy deletion to begin with? RebekahThorn (talk) 16:41, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete page
Talk:High Level Bridge (Edmonton)

message: All of the map links are wrong.  They either are dead or show an unknown location just north of Mongolia. Onishenko 19:43, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map links 

message: From a plaque by the Legislature Grounds. Hope the information helps. --IntrigueBlue 04:25, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transcription of Commemorative Plaque 

message: The photos seem to indicate that traffic only goes in one direction, or perhaps one direction at a time (maybe it reverses during the day?)  Anyway, the article should indicate the direction of vehicular traffic if it's not the regular sort of one-lane-both-directions. PKT(alk) 00:58, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, it must have been an oversight. The infobox says one-way, but not which direction. 117Avenue (talk) 04:15, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vehicular traffic 

message: “The upper deck contains only one track now” – How many did it have before? Did the CP and the street railway share tracks? Or did the streetcar tracks run on the street level? —Michael Z. 2016-06-24 20:58 z
:The upper deck had three sets of tracks. The CP in the middle, and the streetcars on the outside two. The streetcars would switch sides, travelling on the left side, so that the door would face the middle of the deck. 117Avenue (talk) 04:16, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tracks
Talk:Hajnal line

message: I forgot the picture. I'll set it asap --alfanje 21:17, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I believe that the image shown in this article is incorrect, not least because it shows Hajnal's line as connecting with Venice rather than Trieste. An apparently more accurate graphic can be found here:
http://demoblography.blogspot.com/2008/01/hajnal-line.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.24.33.196 (talk) 18:08, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate image? 

message: These are uncited and neglect to mention that anyone got married at age 18, which seems unlikely.
Shmuelic (talk) 18:22, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Canterbury statistics

message: This article needs a criticism section featuring the views of the many researchers who reject the Hajnal Line entirely. This research, 
https://eml.berkeley.edu/~webfac/eichengreen/Dennison.pdf
for instance, found no evidence that late marriage, high celibacy, and nuclear families were necessarily linked. The researchers did, however, find plenty of evidence for heterogeneous marriage patterns and family structures throughout all regions of Europe, and even within the individual states.Jonathan f1 (talk) 02:57, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, folks. You are right: this article lent way too much weight to Hajnal's theory, as if it were a law. It no longer holds favor among scholars and the article should include the new, more popular position. And there's good reason you found links to racist or ethno-nationalist sources promoting the theory; the Hajnal line has always been a favorite among white nationalists and Neo-Nazis, and these are its primary proponents today. I find it deeply disturbing that it has taken so long for someone to heed your calls. Hunan201p (talk) 07:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism?
Template talk:R from CamelCase

message: Please is there a reason for enclosing linked CamelCase between  tags? I think that this causes the word to appear unlinked in this list: Wikipedia:Template messages/Redirect pages#A to D. I consider the link to be important because I did not know what CamelCase is. I propose to change
This is a redirect from a <noinclude>CamelCaseCategory:All redirect templatesCamelCase title. In the initial versions of Wikipedia, all links had to be CamelCase.
to
This is a redirect from a CamelCase title. In the initial versions of Wikipedia, all links had to be CamelCase.
Category:All redirect  templates
pabouk (talk) 10:21, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I can see no reason for this either.  — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:21, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  linking [[CamelCase]] in [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Redirect pages#A to D]] 

message: Since the Printworthy and Unprintworthy categories are to be populated by Main namespace redirects, a small modification to this Rcat will get the several redirects from other namespaces out of those categories.  Please make the following change:
* From this... 
 Category:Unprintworthy redirects
* to this...
 Category:Unprintworthy redirects
That will ensure that the Unprintworthy category will be populated only my Main namespace redirects that are tagged with the  Rcat.  Thank you! – PIE ( CLIMAX )  22:50, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Anomie⚔ 17:27, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, thank you very much, Anomie! – PIE ( CLIMAX )  23:41, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main namespace only 

message: There now exists an  template that redirects to Template:R with old history, so it is confusing to use "subpages" in this Rcat.  Please modify the first sentence as follows:
*from this... 
 This is a redirect from a CamelCase or subpage title.
*to this...
 This is a redirect from a CamelCase title.
Thank you in advance! – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 09:29, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --Redrose64 (talk) 21:39, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you again! – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 00:50, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit needed 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Redirect §  - cutoff date.  All the best, user:A smart kittenmeow 09:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Redirect#&#x7B;&#x7B;R with old history&#x7D;&#x7D; - cutoff date|Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Redirect §&nbsp;&#x7B;&#x7B;R with old history&#x7D;&#x7D; - cutoff date]]
Template talk:R to decade

message: Please add the following wiki-text to allow this template to have documentation.




– Allen4names 02:48, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:45, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. – Allen4names 18:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add documentation 

message: Template:R to decade needs added Rcats.  Please add the Rcats as follows:
  #REDIRECT Template:Redirect to decade (PLEASE LEAVE THIS LINE BLANK) 
Thank you very much! – Paine Ellsworth ( CLIMAX )  08:19, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: . You forgot protected. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:41, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch! – Paine Ellsworth ( CLIMAX )  21:09, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Rcats 

message: Do we want this used on topical articles?  E.g., a redirect from "2017 in underwater basketweaving" to "Underwater basketweaving in the 2010s"?  If this is not desirable, we should probably say so clearly or someone will use it that way.  If it is desirable, we should say so clearly anyway, so people can be sure that's okay.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  07:44, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope? 

message: Per MOS:DASHES, please repalace "from 1700–500 BCE" by "from 1700 to 500 BCE". Thanks. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:50, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:14, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request