Talk:Tourism in Karnataka

message: I added a gallery which makes the article easy to navigate. Dewan S. Ahsan 08:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Gallery

message: Karnataka tourism is an interesting article, but it seems wholly inappropriate for wikipedia, which is an encyclopedia.  Wikipedia is not a tourist guide, so it's not really appropriate to use the same sort of voice or topic.  You might want to try submitting that material at Wikitravel, or rewriting it to be more in line with our content policies and style guide.  I'd especially recommend that you read up on WP:NPOV, along with the No original research policy, which prohibits inserting opinions (your own or others) into articles as fact. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 17:53, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean you dont like the tone of the article (I can edit to remove original research and unsupported claims) or you think tourism article should not be an encyclopedia entry? Leotolstoy 18:50, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriate encyclopedia entry? 

message: This article was heavily edited in 2008 by IP 203.143.176.253, whose pattern of copy-pasting content is well documented by now at North Karnataka. It needs to be thoroughly evaluated to make sure that it is not as tainted as that article was. That article has lost much of its content over this. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:34, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright concerns

message: I am guessing that many items in the external links section are spam due to the names. I am having trouble accessing them, probably because of my ISP. Pls check and prune the list. Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:36, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linkfarm 

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.pearlsindiatour.com/badami-cave-temple.html
*:Triggered by \bpearlsindiatour\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:24, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:38, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:47, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion