lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Meichu Game

message: I translated that article to de.wiki, but thos admins don't like it. They just deleted with the reason "unrelevant", why does the en.wiki doesn't have those problems, and what would you say (not contraproductive) to those admins? 124.8.84.18 (talk) 05:19, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to keep that article in de.wiki 

message: This should be 'Games', analogous to the Olympic Games. It's not just one game, but many. Chinese-language sources are inconsistent as to whether it's "Game" or "Games", but largely seem to use "Game". Do we keep it singular out of deference to the semi-official sources, or change it to "Games" to keep the grammar (and analog to the Olympics) correct?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:B011:1006:D8E0:3CAB:EE8F:A8E5:A837 (talk) 03:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be 'Games'
Talk:Circuba

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 02:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Harleian Miscellany

message: The attribution for this article needs to be updated to reflect the fact that William Oldys is  the compiler and editor of the Harleian Miscellany, and not Samuel Johnson. Henry Savage writes: "The Harleian Miscellany of tracts and pamphlets selected from the library of Edward Harley, 2nd Earl of Oxford, by William Oldys, his secretary, and with an Introduction by Dr. Johnson, was first published in eight volumes 8to. during the years 1744-46." (Savage, Henry. "Introduction." The Harleian Miscellany. Cecil Palmer: London, 1924. v.)
This attribution can be confirmed by consulting any modern bibliographic record of the work. I leave it to those more familiar with Oldys to write the correction, and fill out the biographical information.
Whitino (talk) 16:28, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  William Oldys the editor, not Johnson 

message: This article should go into the three different editions of the Harleian Miscellany.
Also, complete sets of all editions have been digitized; I've written a short blog post, http://alsatia.org.uk/site/2013/11/harleian-miscellany/ giving digital copies for each volume of the three editions. Should each individual volume be linked from the page? At any rate, my own work so I must let someone else decide how to use it. ;)
Technolalia (talk) 15:59, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I may be wrong but I don't think blogs are allowed as sources. But you definitely have done a valuable service in finding and listing the three different editions, a very useful feat! It would definitely improve the article if you could illustrate the history of its publication using secondary sources and also incorporate your listings as well in order to help readers.--Britannicus (talk) 16:33, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different editions and volumes 

message: I have heard of this only as a source for documents illustrating seventeenth-century history.  What is the scope of the collection? J S Ayer (talk) 19:13, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content
Talk:Laurus Škurla

message: The initial content of this article was taken from WrthodoxWiki , which operates under GFDL license, with minor modifications.Biophys (talk) 05:29, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Daphna Dove

message: Criteria A7 is narrowly defined for articles where no assertions of notability are made.  This article clearly makes claims that it is notable.  Whether such claims pass our notability guidelines is up for debate.  If deletion is sought, please open an Articles for Deletion discussion and seek consensus to do so.  --Jayron32|talk|contribs 05:42, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion request denied
File talk:Kevin Trudeau Updated Edition.jpg

message: This existing picture is an advertisement for his book. Such advertising is not allowed here. It's doubly problematic because it's false advertising. The book doesn't deliver what it promises, and even if it did, quackery shouldn't be promoted here or elsewhere.
We need to find a portrait of him as he appears now, not some fancy picture of him in his youth, or some doctored junk. Fyslee 09:16, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The book does deliver what it promises --- for crying out loud, just do the things listed in Chapter 6!  --Luigifan 16:43, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Problematic image of Trudeau
Talk:Vox Mark III

message: : If this article is entitled "Vox Mark III," it should not also discuss the Mark VI and Mark XII. Retitle the article or move them elsewhere. Badagnani (talk) 06:07, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The title is wrong. It's Mark VI not III. VI stands for 6 strings, Please change the name.83.87.170.234 (talk) 21:24, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Other instruments

message: This article makes no sense. It's titled Vox Mark III, but it seems to be about a range of guitars produced by Vox. I don't know enough about this instrument to be able to fix it... GigglesnortHotel (talk) 13:55, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article makes no sense
Talk:Guest appearance

message: It has come to my attention that while searching for the meaning of the world 'feat', wikipedia redirected me to the term 'guest appearance'. Now this is almost completely flawed as the meaning of the term 'feat' is, reciting the dictionary "n. remarkable, skillful, or daring action." Please fix this problem unless you can proove that guest appearance is another meaning for the word feat. Please notify me of a change to this page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guy from next door (talk • contribs) 09:21, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "feat" as an abbreviation of "featuring" is indeed a kind of guest appearance. But the Feat page has changed from a simple redirect to a proper disambig page to reflect the multiple meanings involved. CapnZapp (talk) 19:01, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

text: A "feat" on its own is absolutely NOT an abbreviation of "featuring"! The abbreviated form of features/featuring/etc requires a PUNCTUATION MARK (ie. full stop) to denote that it represents the abbreviated word, as in "feat. Bob Dylan". A feat is altogether different - a remarkable action, as the first fellow defined - for example, "a feat of dexterity" or "a heroic feat". Pete Hobbs (talk) 05:08, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of 'feat' 

message: Why does guest of honor redirect here?  The guest of honor is the person for whom a social event is being given -- as in, "The birthday boy is the guest of honor", or "I am giving this party in honor of my friend, the celebrated author".  WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:11, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guest of honor redirects here? 

message: I'd like to suggest the term "contemporary music" for the "Pop Music"-section, simply because Rap and Rock - just as the lion's share of music in general - are not Pop Music.
(They are popular, but not Pop.)
The way it's written now might lead to people mistaking the term 'pop' for the genre.
Wrath of the Dunmer (talk) 14:33, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pop Music? 

message: Why do most songs with those have only one lead artist? For example, (artist name) featuring (artist name), (artist name), and (artist name). Eloc08 (talk) 05:43, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Songs with multiple featured artists 

message: The "List of guest characters in video games" page currently redirects to the list in this article under the subsection "Video games", but since there are multiple articles dedicated to lists of guest characters in television, wouldn't the same list but for a different medium also be notable? RayanWP (talk) 08:03, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. This article is unbalanced and overwhelmed by the list of video games. This section should be separated out to a new article. Masato.harada (talk) 15:49, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should "List of guest characters in video games" be converted into its own article?
Talk:Anglo-Bavarian Brewery

message: The Anglo-Bavarian was NOT the first lager brewery in the UK, despite many people claiming it was, and there is no evidence it ever brewed lager at all. See here. Unfortunately that's my original research, so I can't update this page. Perhaps someone else would like to do the job … Zythophile (talk) 11:40, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your comment, however I think this is one of those debates where semantic discussion & definitions will never be agreed. The definition of lager may not be the same in all the different uses. I note the BBC, to which the claim is cited, describe the Shepton site as "Britain's first lager brewery". Looking at your blog entry (which you are right can not be cited as a Reliable source) doesn't cite references. Presumably you have documentary evidence which could be cited?— Rod talk 13:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You're asking me to prove the Anglo-Bavarian DIDN'T brew lager - I suggest it's up to someone to prove it DID, because, believe me, there IS no evidence it did, and it's nothing to do with any idea that "The definition of lager may not be the same in all the different uses." I really don't think relying on the BBC writing 130 years or so after the fact is good enough evidence - it's simply hearsay by the BBC - and the article really ought to say something on the lines of "sometimes claimed to be the first lager brewery in Britain, although brewing historians have been unable to find evidence to back this up". Zythophile (talk) 12:40, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You are welcome to edit the article along those lines, however I would suggest the BBC reference is kept as it is generally considered that the BBC counts as a Reliable source. It would be really useful to also add a reference to where brewing historians say they can't find any evidence.— Rod talk 14:48, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

text: I have added references to the pages in Davis's book where he makes the claim that the brewery was producing lager. I don't know which is right, so I would suggest that the article will just have to refer to both sides of the argument - I have therefore changed the lead para so that it says that "the evidence is disputed" rather than "there is no evidence". DavidWard talk 19:16, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOT the first lager brewery in the UK 
Talk:A Farewell to Arms (1957 film)

message: This article has been checked against the project's criteria for B-Class status:
# Referencing and citation:  criterion not met
#:"Production notes" is insufficiently referenced; the Hemmingway quote needs a citation, as does the award nomination further in.
# Coverage and accuracy:  criterion not met
#:Article skims over some key elements such as release, box office and home media.
# Structure:  criterion met
#:
# Grammar:  criterion met
#:
# Supporting materials:  criterion met
#:
See also Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Film for guidance on writing about films. PC78 (talk) 12:26, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-Class review for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Film|WikiProject Film]] 2 August 2016 
Talk:Don't Just Vote, Get Active

message: So, I always remembered this being called "Don't Just (Not) Vote", and checked it up, and it shows up a bit, though I'm not sure if it should be the title, or just parenthesed aka. Murderbike (talk) 06:37, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't come across any reliable sources using the alternate title so far, but it gets a significant number of Google hits so I've included it as an aka for now. Skomorokh incite 07:10, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I know Infoshop.org doesn't fulfill RS, but I can't imagine it wouldn't be enough for these purposes. Murderbike (talk) 07:41, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: RS? Reliable source? We are a reliable source (most of the time). Chuck0 (talk) 06:48, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I found 'Don't Just Vote used as the name in Rolling Thunder, so I've added that as a citation. think it would be a good idea for the Anarchism task force to figure out whether Infoshop and other anarchist non-dead tree media qualify as reliable (in the technical sense). If so, they could be extremely valuable sources. Skomorokh confer 23:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: name
Talk:List of Friday Night Lights characters

message: who plays tami taylor's sister
:Shelley Hayes is played by Jessalyn Gilsig. And yes, she's Terri from Glee. Lampman (talk) 19:11, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

message: Being as the show's run is finished I thought it more appropriate if all of the main characters were under one section.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.168.223.209 (talk) 14:09, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recurring Characters 

message: I'm missing Slammin' Sammy Meade (David Cowgill), see IMDB. -- Stf (talk) 20:04, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slammin' Sammy Meade
Template talk:Major roads in Singapore

message: How is it decided that these are the major roads in Singapore? Is there a reference from LTA or? --Stefan talk 06:23, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Pick up any authoritative street directory and it is indicated by the width of the road. I doubt the newer mightyminds era editions work thou.--Huaiwei (talk) 16:11, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, before I asked I checked 2, and they where different, but one is mightyminds. I will do some more research and see. I was more hoping for a answer with a link to a LTA web site. Thanks! --Stefan talk 06:07, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. I would advise against using mightminds and other publications used at present thou, since they are no longer produced by the government, so there is no guarantee they will be error free. Meanwhile, if I recall correctly, the URA also have a classification of roads as part of its master plans.--Huaiwei (talk) 09:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Do not worry, I do not really care to change the template in wikipedia, I wanted to use wikipedia as a source for how to represent roads in openstreet map, but since there is no good reference for wikiepdia I'm not sure how to do it. I have not had time to check anything yet, do you know if the master plans can be found online? --Stefan talk 00:39, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My GOD I didnt know there is such a thing as openstreet!! Cool for a map freak like me!! Maybe I can give u a hand over there when I can find the time hehe. Anyway the most recent Master Plan 2003 can be found here:  The Master Plan 2008 is due to be published soon thou. But I forgot to mention that the major/minor road thing can only be found in the individual reports at , which is a tad outdated by now. Click on each locality, click on the "about XX planning area" link, then click transportation. Some plans may not publish the road hierachy map online thou...--Huaiwei (talk) 16:31, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, will read! Please head over to openstreet map, there is LOTS to do, look at europe and US, they have VERY good maps now, Singapore was basically non existant 2 months ago, now me and one more guy is slowly making some progress, but we need more help! --Stefan talk 02:15, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't the category of :Category:Roads in Singapore be includeonly? Because I don't want anything bad to happen, so I'm asking first. ~Milnivri~ 14:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category
Talk:Chellis Glendinning

message: This article seems very promotion, without any clear sources to support its assertions. Unless we can add more sources I suggest returning it to a stub and working back up from sources.  ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 06:30, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems tome that the article is pretty well sourced except for the second paragraph.  Maybe I need to look at the sources better. Carptrash (talk) 06:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the "sources" are web-pages, blogs, her own material, broken links, etc...all of which are strictly unacceptable for a BLP. Also, OR is unacceptable, as well. Unless you can find legitimate RS to support the text, those parts must be redacted. I didn't want to "intrude" on this article (as it were) if an interested editor is willing to have a go at clean-up. Is that the case with you? Thanks, Agricola44 (talk) 15:07, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think I'll spend much time on this. You can go ahead and reduce it to a solid stub.  I read the article and think "That sounds like her" which I realize is a long way from what we need in the way of documentation. The fact that her papers are collected at the Joseph A. Labadie Collection is, to me, very meaningful Carptrash (talk) 17:33, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. I will try to reduce it to a smaller form (maybe stub) in which all info is solidly RS'ed. Agricola44 (talk) 13:59, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Rev't ClueBot false positive, so it is reasonably well there. However, it's picture-heavy and looks CV'ish, so I may refine it a bit more. Agricola44 (talk) 22:19, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone and verification
Talk:Roanoke-Chowan News-Herald

message: O contrare... Everything presented which was without factual basis was presented directly as an opinion which had circulated through the community.  Such circulation is a fact which is readily verifiable.  How should I know?  Oh yeah... Because I am a member of that community.  My guess is that you are not.  Or if you are then you have compromised this entry either through ignorance or a personal agenda.  Censorship has no place of Wikipedia!  And you would do well to remember that.
p.s.  Your censorship has been undone!  Kudos!--Clayt85 (talk) 00:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks to whomever made the corrections ! Engr105th (talk) 03:48, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:The Flowers (Chinese band)

message: and responding to a correction made earlier in this article:
yeah i dont think qiong kai xin means "Shiny Happiness" either. I think it's just because the person who uploaded the music video to youtube called it "shiny happiness" so its like established as that. people discussing this video on crunchyroll.com also called it "shiny happiness". but i don't know what a good translation of qiong kaixin would be though...
Edgesused999 (talk) 02:38, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Brunei

message: Hello WikiProject Brunei: 
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a  month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts. 
We hope to see you there!
Grnrchst (talk) 12:46, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women in Green's 5th Edit-a-thon 

message: Hello, everyone! I'd like to invite you all to sign up for the upcoming 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest. The event runs from July 1 to September 30 and signups close on July 15. The WikiContest focuses on developing countries. The intention is to improve the English Wikipedia's coverage and comprehension of articles related to developing countries. For this reason, you may also expect that articles related to Brunei may be heavily edited during the contest. More information on how points will be awarded can be found at Wikipedia:2024 Developing Countries WikiContest/Scoring. For comments or suggestions, please don't hesitate to reach out to Wikipedia talk:2024 Developing Countries WikiContest. Thank you! (Copied with permission of Chlod) CMD (talk) 12:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Invitation for the 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest
Talk:List of accidents and incidents involving the Ilyushin Il-14

message: Listing all these hijack cases and hangar fires does nothing to describe the in-service safety record of this particular aircraft.
Apart from that, I think this list is far too long for inclusion in the main Il-14 article.
--Wikitanian (talk) 17:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

message: The "Il-14" that was seen derelict in 1991, was not an Il-14, but an Il-12. According to this source  the registration (CCCP-41807) comes up as an Il-12D; the c/n is also incorrect; ASN lists it as 93013318 (which is also an Il-12), but the correct c/n is 93033819. Meltdown627 (talk) 18:50, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not an Il-14 crash?
Talk:Tetralin

message: Is there anyone who can provide information on the resonance structures of this molecule? I'm just curious as I've never seen a cyclohexane ring fused with a benzene ring, and wonder if the product would be planar and aromatic, or partly planar and partly bent from the cyclohexane chair configuration. Would be much appreciated. Mr0t1633 (talk) 07:56, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lone Star Airlines

message: http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=2568574
says that Lone Star flew to Maquiladora towns
WhisperToMe (talk) 16:54, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Stuff

message: This article meets the requirements for Start class. I have made the change for WP:Oklahoma. Bruin2 (talk) 20:07, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Article assessment
Category talk:Food and drink companies by country

message: The story about the Bagoong has nothing to do with this category. There is an article on Bagoong, but how much of this story is relevant I can´t say.  Gardenparty (talk) 06:56, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It may be relevant, but it should not be on this page.  Please move to another page or create one for this article.  Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 18:56, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Beechwood Bunny Tales

message: Below is a list of foreign titles for the book/TV series. Interested translators can work on these and put them into the book article when finished.
* De Familie Passiebloem 
* Die Häschenbande
* Tappancsmesék
* La Famiglia Passiflora
* ベルフラワーバニーズ (from this language's Bandai article)
* 까르르 토끼 친구들 
* A Família Passiflore
* La Famille Passiflore 
--Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 03:07, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation polling 

message: This eBay listing proves there's been Passiflore merchandise outside the books. Then again, I'm sorry I can't add it in because it fails WP:RS, and online there's no other proof of Ravensburger's involvement.
However, there's another page that refers to a different manufacturer, Nathan. I'll see what I can do this weekend before and during PR. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 00:40, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ravensburger