Talk:Benchmark (crude oil)

message: October 17, 2008 - The adjectives used to describe the oil grades here, such as "sweet" or "heavy", are too abstract and hard to understand. They should be put in less ambiguous terms or described concretely.
-----------------------------------------------   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.3.16.40 (talk) 05:29, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

message: :Image:Oil&gasprices.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Oil&gasprices.jpg

message: ITs now out of date to say that Brent and WTI are typically only a few dollars apart in price. WTI nows trades at a hefty discount, reaching $23 less than Brent last week. see  for a reference on the FT website Nyb.Thering (talk) 11:22, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTI/Brent price difference 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Benchmark (crude oil). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131003093310/http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/sites/www.nrcan.gc.ca.energy/files/pdf/eneene/sources/crubru/revrev/pdf/revrev-09-eng.pdf to http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/sites/www.nrcan.gc.ca.energy/files/pdf/eneene/sources/crubru/revrev/pdf/revrev-09-eng.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:17, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Benchmark (crude oil). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101113164128/http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/ask/crude_types1.html to http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/ask/crude_types1.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060322115911/https://www.platts.com/Oil/Resources/News%20Features/crudeanalysis/index.xml to http://platts.com/Oil/Resources/News%20Features/crudeanalysis/index.xml
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/sites/www.nrcan.gc.ca.energy/files/pdf/eneene/sources/crubru/revrev/pdf/revrev-09-eng.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:00, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified