Talk:Pannonian Plain

message: : [...] surrounded by imposing geographic boundaries that have created a fairly unified cultural area that looks more towards the south and east than to the north and west.
Can someone elaborate this? Why exactly are the Dinarides, the Balkan mountain and the Translyvanian Alps more apt for "looking" at compared to the Tatras and the eastern Alps? How is the landscape causing the area to look more toward some region, anyway? I don't quite see how this follows in this case. --Joy [shallot] 18:28, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: "unified" and "looks more toward"

message: This difference should be dealt with in some detail, since the latter term is also mentioned in the article, although there is a concept of Alföld or Nagyalföld (Great Plain), which is only a part of the Pannonian Plain. It ends at Dunántúli-középhegység (Transdanubian mountains) and Mecsek mountain in the west (so it certainly does not include most of the Transdanubian area) and at Északi-középhegység (Northern mountains) in the north. In short, the Pannonian Plain is bigger than today's Hungary, and the Great Plain is smaller; they should not be confused. Could anyone clarify it in the article?
-Adam78 03:20, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Difference between Pannonian Plain and Great Hungarian Plain

message: There is related information that will be useful to anyone researching this subject at the article Pannonian basin before Hungary.
User Panonian deleted this twice stating that this is "POV".
I must say, this is a new one on me.  How can a "see also" link be POV?
What is the supposed "POV"?  I'm just saying that this is related (and overlapping) information.  The idea of wikipedia is to provide links if there are related articles, not suppress them.
I cannot for the life of me imagine what "POV" you see here.  I'm not stating that the two topics are equivalent.  I'm not stating anything at all.  I just want to make it easier for researchers to get to related information.
ፈቃደ (ውይይት) 15:47, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you read this history section, you would know that it do not speak about history of Hungary or about time period before Magyars arrived to Hungary. It speak about ENTIRE history of the plain that belong to several countries, and if you post that link there, that imply that entire plain is Hungary, which is claim of Greater Hungarian irredentists. I hope that you understand now what is POV here. PANONIAN (talk) 21:08, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I wasn't trying to imply anything and I'm not sure a "see also" link implies anything.  It is just to help people researching the subject to find related info.  But if you object, fine - I guess a clever researcher would still be able to find that other article, if they were determined enough. ፈቃደ (ውይይት) 21:37, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not said that you had intentions to imply, but that link itself imply. I suggest that you learn more about regional politics. :) PANONIAN (talk) 22:17, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  related links with related information pov? I don't get it. 

message: This article could use a map. Anybody? --AW (talk) 22:15, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map