lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Janssen Pharmaceuticals

message: I would like to propose merging Janssen Biotech into Janssen Pharmaceuticals. As far as I can tell, while these may once have been separate entities they have subsequently been reorganised into a single brand under Johnson & Johnson's ownership. As it is it is confusing as the two articles do not explain why they are separate. The external links on both pages now redirect to the same page (janssen.com/us). The separate origins of these companies can still be discussed in this article, but I don't think there's much value to two separate articles with very similar names (one of which appears to be defunct). Beevil (talk) 17:10, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I can support a merge but I oppose deletion of content. Also, there is a good case for not merging. The Pharma company is 40 years old, consumed billions of dollars, consumed other companies with their own histories, and likely had big impact on a billion lives. Sources are slim and it is yet another company in a multi-trillion dollar space, but this is an organization with massive documentation somewhere. There is another org to consider, Janssen Vaccines, with a similar slim Wikipedia article and yet high consumption resources. I do not think we get too much clarity in merging the articles, and we may lose the historical narrative by combining multiple massive organizations into one timeline and story. That said, right now we are scarce on content, which is a typical reason for considering merges.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:31, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose merge, as I think that the clearest structure for readers is to keep these subsidiaries separate from Janssen Pharmaceuticals. They are adequately referenced to support notability, and the scope of their endeavor (and history) is sufficiently distinct that it worth treating separately. Klbrain (talk) 14:31, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

text: As an employee of this company I can highly recommend merging all those separate articles (Janssen Biotech and Janssen Vaccines) into Janssen Pharmaceuticals. @Beevil is right. All those companies are operating under Johnson & Johnson as "The Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson". The way it is now in wikipedia, is super confusing and rather leads to loss of valuable information e.g. about the history and how the business is structured. One article, containing all the information would be very helpful.   37.26.230.163 (talk) 14:16, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: For Janssen Biotech,  Klbrain (talk) 03:23, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger discussion

message: Jans 190.115.175.140 (talk) 20:17, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  40809875
Talk:Thirra

message: The ref section is empty. Need some references to verify certain points , especially the region .Also the lead was too long without any subsections  . I did split the lead and created a subsection , without making much changes.  However it would be better if a reference is added. Bilgiljilll (talk) 13:48, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The reference section is empty
Talk:2006 Bulgarian presidential election

message: :Some of the right-wing parties were disunited at the time but still chose to support a common candidate, Nedelcho Beronov
Who did they support (if anyone) in the second round? Nil Einne 16:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Although Hans-Gert Pöttering advised them to support Parvanov, they didn't officially support anyone. Most of their sympathizers, however, voted for Parvanov. Todor→Bozhinov 17:40, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who did the right parties support 

message: Why is the list organised as it is? Was this the officially numbering on the ballot or whatever? It doesn't appear to be in alphabetical order but perhaps it is in Bulgarian Nil Einne 16:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's the official numbering. It's not in alphabetical order or anything, just a draw. Todor→Bozhinov 17:42, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  List 

message: => is it somewhere in a web archive ?  Or does so. have another reliable source ? --Neun-x (talk) 18:38, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  site http://www.izbori2006.org ist 'dead'  
Talk:List of Robots characters

message: I made a substantial effort at cleanup and removed the cleanup tag. Mmoyer 03:58, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Somebody tagged it again.  I removed it for ya.Konczewski 22:09, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: This article neeeeeds to be merged into the Robots page. Lots42 (talk) 19:31, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: The colors of each robot are identified in both this list and the main article; however, neither explains what the colors mean or why they are worth identifying. --*momoricks* (talk) 12:35, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Colors
Talk:Tribhanga

message: In this article, the subject isn't consistently capitalized or italicized.  In various places within the article, it's given as "Tribhanga" (capitalized, not italicized), "Tribhanga" (capitalized, italicized), and "tribhanga" (lower-case, italicized).  I can't begin to offer an opinion on which is correct; but we should reach consensus on, and then consistently use, a single form.  Ammodramus (talk) 23:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency in capitalization, italicization
Talk:Tripuri cuisine

message: Note:  Project Banner with Tripura workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Tripura or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:56, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Tripura Addition 

message: Please add some citation. There is no citation from reliable source Jackob Ck (talk) 16:49, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation
Talk:Upma

message: Upma (ఉప్మా) is upma in Telugu as mentioned for Tamil & Malayalam. I dont know about Kanada. 
Upma is made from Wheat flour. 
Uppu-pindi (ఉప్పు పిండి) on the other hand is made from Rice flour. This is hard boiled. Often leaving a burnt crust at the bottom. Red (dried) chillies are used as compared with green (fresh) chillies in Upma. 
I will wait for 7 days for responces to this talk, before editing the title.
SrinivasP (talk) 07:41, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upma in Telugu is Upma. 

message: Most of the information provided in this article is common knowledge amongst the people of South India. Hence I am removing the warning against it. Aandu (talk) 16:59, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article References 

message: All the books I have, on Indian cooking and such, spell it as uppma - the article is upma. Is there a full consensus or are both spellings more or less equivalent? --Dumarest (talk) 21:26, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  upma - uppma 

message: In the preparation portion of the upma recipe, it says, "Then add cumin, ginger, green chillies and chopped onions and fry until onions caramelise."
However, neither chillies nor ginger are in the list of ingredients above the preparation section. GeneCallahan (talk) 09:39, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing ingredients 

message: The last sentence is "It is also high in glycemic index and is good for diabetics." That does not seem to be worded correctly, because high glycemic foods would be bad for diabetics, wouldn't they? 172.220.169.132 (talk) 04:14, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wheat Upma discrepancy
Talk:Vada pav

message: Now is the vada pav really indigenous to maharashtra. There seem to be some stories that this was actually the mysore bonda or simply called bonda in the south which found its way back though vyankoji who was ruling thanjavur.This needs to be researched  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.183.2.222 (talk) 15:32, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  from bonda to vada pav 

message: Under "Variation," chili is misspelled as chilly.
Chrisahavel (talk) 21:54, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo
Talk:Vazhuvoor (Dance)

message: The title of this article should be changed to reflect the contents (Bharatha Natyam pani).
Vazhuvoor (Vazhuvur) is the name of a village in the Kuththalam Taluk of Nagapatinam District, Tamil Nadu, India.
The pani was named after its inventor Ramiah Pillai who hails from this village. - Uksharma3 (talk) 05:40, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Axel Scherer

message: Would it be outlandish to record quotes from Professor Scherer regarding nanotechnology and microfluidics?--131.215.166.171 (talk) 00:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 2009 comment 
Talk:Velakali

message: In the Sri Lankan chronicle Cūḷavaṁsa (55.05, 63.24) there are several reference to Velaikkara soldiers in the 10-12 centuries. They were paid soldiers of the Sinhalese kings and not mercenaries. Their religion is mentioned as Matantra in an inscription by them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.43.88.249 (talk) 15:48, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Velaikkaras in Sri Lanka
Talk:Markus Grosskopf

message: Changed the picture to a clearer and more recent one.~~  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PactaSuntServanda (talk • contribs) 01:30, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Talk:Day of the Tiles

message: Hi all.
I think there is an error:
in the phrase “Long live our parliament! May God save the king and may the devil take Brienne and Lamoignon!” Here, the link in the word "Lamoignon" leads to the page of a person named "Chrétien Guillaume de Lamoignon de Malzerbes".
In fact, according to the logic of things, as well as in the French version of the page, the link by the surname “Lamoignon” leads to the person Chrétien François de Lamoignon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chr%C3%A9tien_Fran%C3%A7ois_de_Lamoignon_de_Basville
It was he, and not de Malzerbe, who initiated the reforms of the abolition and reorganization of the French parliaments. 46.19.86.162 (talk) 03:30, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  the link in the word "Lamoignon" leads to the page of a wrong person 

message: This article doubts its own sources at various points. This kind of editorializing can approach original research. If we really doubt our sources, then we need to find other sources, not editorialize. Daask (talk) 13:58, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doubting our sources
Talk:Lisbon Region

message: "Dear Sir 
Despite the territorial configuration for statistical purposes (National Statistical System in Portugal), in force since 2007, matching the NUTS II the Lisbon, Region Greater Lisbon (AML) - composed only NUTSIII Greater Lisbon and Setúbal Peninsula - the area of intervention of the CCDRLVT - Steering Committee and Regional Development, abbreviated to CCDR - (the Lisbon and the Tagus Valley), continues to be composed of 5 NUTSIII (Sub-regions: Greater Lisbon, Setúbal Peninsula, Middle Tagus, and Lezíria West Coast). 
For the Regional Funds, management responsibilities under the policy of the European Union in Portugal, this regions it's the region of Lisbon that consists of Grande Lisboa and Península de Setúbal, for regional planning (Run, monitor and evaluate, at regional level, policies on environment, nature conservation, land management and city) the region is called Lisbon and the Tagus Valley (LVT), composed by 5 NUTSIII (Sub-regions: Greater Lisbon, Setúbal Peninsula, Middle Tagus, and Lezíria West Coast).
NUT - Numenclatura the territorial statistical~
With best regards
C C D R L V T
 
 
DDRI- Divisão de Documentação e Recursos Informáticos
Rua da Artilharia Um, 33
1269-145 Lisboa
Telef. 21 383 71 01    Fax: 21 383 12 92
Email: leonor.mina@ccdr-lvt.pt
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
De:  
Enviada: quinta-feira, 28 de Janeiro de 2010 9:03
Para: ddri-documentacao@ccdr-lvt.pt
Assunto: Lisboa (e Vale do Tejo)
Bonjour, 
I’ve seen on a document of the European Commission that there’s a region of Lisbon that consists of Grande Lisboa and Península de Setúbal. 
 
But, your site is the one of Lisboa e Vale do Tajo (with five NUTS III).
 
Can you tell me why there’s this difference?"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabant (talk • contribs) 08:22, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Answer of the CCDRLVT about NUTS II region and area of intervention of the [[CCDRLVT]]
Talk:Altered book

message: Sounds more like vandalism to me than art.  A book is a work of art in its own right.  For someone else to modify it without the consent of the writers, illustrators and photographers seems to be a very rude and arrogant act! Why don't we just paint a moustache on the Mona Lisa? 209.209.223.98 22:24, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a similar idea to scrap booking, except instead of starting with an empty book of blank pages, you use a normal book. It also allows for 3d objects to be added by opening more space through the ripping or cutting of pages.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.91.28.221 (talk) 23:58, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I fully understand the point against this art form, and as a writer/book lover I at first cringed at the idea of a book being so destroyed. I realized, however, that a book is nothing compared to the words within it. A book is binding, paper, ink, almost nothing in literary value. Print is not the art of a bookwriter, words are. A book has no value compared to the idea the words possess, and as long as those words exist in some form they too have value. If someone made such an art with the last copy in the world of a given book, that would be inarguably bad,, but with the technologies we've developed and our means of communication, knowledge has become essentially immortal. To return to the Mona Lisa example, drawing a mustache on the Mona Lisa would be atrocious. Drawing a mustache on a copy of the Mona Lisa is harmless, because as long as copies exist, nothing is truly being destroyed. Quasnoflaut (talk) 17:51, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

message: Would it benefit this article to start a list of artists creating altered books?  E.g., Brian Dettmer. For other examples, see also the book New Directions in Altered Books by Gabe Cyr. Klyber (talk) 21:20, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idea to Expand Article with Examples 

message: Altered books shouldn't face a copyright issue so long as they aren't reproduced. As the name suggests, copyright controls if you can copy a work. Altered books take legal copies and change them, but they don't reproduce anything. The publisher legally sold it to you, so you cannot make a copy of it in whole or part, but other than that they have no legal claim to whatever else you do with it. 66.41.66.213 (talk) 18:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that an altered book would most likely be a deemed a "derivative work" of the original book.  Under copyright law (17 USC 106), the copyright owner has the exclusive right to "make" a derivative work, which does not necessarily require that a copy be made.  Moreover, if one wanted to photograph or otherwise reproduce the altered book, the reproduction right is also implicated.  So, yes, there are copyright issues.  (You may enjoy reading this page: http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/claw/lhooq0.htm, which references Duchamp's mustache on the Mona Lisa, as suggested above).  Klyber (talk) 00:56, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What copyright issue?
Talk:Come Wander with Me

message: The article states that this was the last episode of THE TWILIGHT ZONE to be filmed. That is incorrect. It was scheduled to be the final episode to be filmed, however, "The Fear", which missed its initial filming dates wound up being moved ahead in the schedule and it was the last episode filmed. This information can be found in Martin Grams book THE TWILIGHT ZONE: UNLOCKING OF A TELEVISION CLASSIC as well as other sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.163.19.42 (talk) 22:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I saw "Mary Rachel" in the show's credits, so I am changing the "Mary-Rachael" I see here.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.82 (talk) 19:52, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  spelling of the woman character's name 

message: Late in the episode, they close in on Floyd, and we only see their shadows. Carlm0404 (talk) 05:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  We don't actually see the three brotherw
Talk:Bryan Higgins

message: Could one get a doctorate in physics in 1765? Or was he actually a doctor of "physick" (medicine)? -FZ 20:40, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  his degree 

message: Some suggestions for improvement as the article is expanded:
*Template:Infobox Scientist should be added 
*Portrait should be added 
*Article should be divided into appropriate subheadings  
*Information on research should be expanded
*References should be converted to inline format
*External links to useful online resources should be added if available
Espresso Addict 17:16, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review comments
Talk:Pobol y Cwm

message: This is years out of date. Could someone upload the current one (2017)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noxy83 (talk • contribs) 11:51, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title card/logo 

message: I don't watch this programme, but the episode count is severely outdated. Does anyone who watch know the correct count? – DarkGlow (talk) 13:41, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode count 

message: The pronunciation was changed without consensus by IP 195.171.176.194 on 15 February 2024, from [ˈpɔb.ɔl ə ˈkʊm] to [ˈpɔb.ɔl ə ˈkam]. I have reverted this, as there are simply no circumstances where /w/ in Welsh is pronounced [a]. The original IPA was correct, and this is completely uncontroversial. DeioOrCwm (talk) 13:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Help:IPA/Welsh does provide "Cwm" for ʊ, and never heard it as "kam". So agree, thanks. DankJae 14:53, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Charles Lauritsen

message: I tried to insert the exlink referencing the change in China Lake's name. I have included the link in the page comment history. Thanks!
LittleRedWriter (talk) 16:47, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tried to Insert External Link
Talk:Blackbird (journal)

message: What should the title of the article page be?  Links have recently been linked to Blackbird: the on online journal of literature and the arts.  This is a long name for a page, but I gave it this name when I started the stub.  It was changed to Blackbird (journal), which does not describe it as beeing an online journal.  I changed it to Blackbird (online journal) to indicate that it was a journal and that it was online.  Perhaps a consensus opinion would be helpful. Snowman 22:39, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title of the article page

message: In addition to doing some reformatting I have added a couple of issues tags back on the article. The main issue is self-references. On 2 or 3 of the references are to third party sources. Self-references are not reliable sources in support of notability. – ukexpat (talk) 19:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues 
Talk:University Square, Bucharest

message: "instaurated" is not a word. What is intended? - Jmabel | Talk 22:39, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Instaurated"

message: I've taken a recent pass through, attempting to clean up some very poor English. If I've misunderstood anything, please feel feel free to correct me: it means whatever was there before must have been downright incomprehensible. Also: what on earth is a "stum shop"? Make no sense to me an any language I can think of. - Jmabel | Talk 20:03, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "stum shop"
Talk:Film promotion

message: Is it true that the marketing people can twist quotes to make the seem more favourable? For example if one reviewer said "Not exactly the greatest film ever" then the marketing people would be able to quote that person as saying "The greatest film ever".
That probably does happen, but I think in the UK at least, it would be picked up by the Advertising Standards Authority. Devoninspiration 10:38, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotes?

message: This article seems very biased and not a "neutral POV" on the subject -- as written it seems to have downright disdain for the topic. The article needs to be rewritten (possibly merged as part of a reorganization of film marketing articles as a whole?) -- I noticed a dreaded "some people" statement or two. -Jca2112 07:23, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV?

message: Isn't a "movie junket" often called "press junket"?
Agreed, "Press Junket" is the only way I have heard the term junket applied when referred to by the television media.
Why are press junkets not discussed here?SUNY Boy (talk) 21:27, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  >Right expression 

message: Yeah, I keep wondering about that, too.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anon126 (talk • contribs) 07:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: About the "Quotes" thing...
Talk:Saint Matthew and the Angel

message: I have removed the "(Caravaggio)" from this article's title, as no disambiguation was needed. --Masamage ♫ 05:49, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved 

message: Given that no colour photographs of the original exist, but that black and white photographs do, wouldn't it be more true to use a black and white photograph in the info box, to represent what we "know" about the image, perhaps with a colourized one in body of the article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tedd (talk • contribs) 14:57, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest a B&W image, instead of colour
Talk:Disco Bloodbath

message: *The only place I've been able to find this book to buy is on the Internet. Is this a banned book? -- 67.67.42.253 22:45, 31 October 2006
*Why is this book only available online?and for so much money?I am to understand, the author will not share this work of art with everyone and only a few . -- 67.49.118.113 04:18, 25 November 2006 
:Its an out of print book that didnt have widespread distribution. You'd have better luck picking up the book "Clubland" which covers the same material.  ALKIVAR™ ☢ 14:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Where is the book?
Talk:Banner (Unix)

message: The horizontal banner mode isn't just for terminals. (The article currently says "which prints text horizontally for display to a terminal".) It is useful for large type printing on linemode printers, and I've seen it used to print job owner (ie user) on coversheets of printouts. --Elijah (talk) 01:44, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Not just for terminals
Talk:Yumenoshima

message: "Island of Dreams," an artificial island created by sanitation landfill (garbage and sand in alternating layers) was treated extensively in a book on pollution and environmental issues in Japan, published in the late 60s in Tokyo by a now-defunct press. Titled "Island of Dreams," it was written by Michael Reich and Nori Huddle, who travelled extensively in Japan gathering firsthand material for the book.Trapani 22:03, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Dōgojima

message: Dogojima is a misnomer based on an incorrect assumption that all Japanese islands have the kanji 島　(shima or jima) as an ending. The island is called 島後Shimane Prefecture official website (Japanese) (Dogo) in Japanese and  DogoOki Islands UNESCO Global Geopark official website or Dogo IslandOkinoshima Town official website  in English . Several users have corrected the name on this and other pages. Is it possible to rename this page Dogo and have Dogojima as a redirect?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nishi2020 (talk • contribs) 05:41, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to change page name to "Dogo" 