Talk:Nigel Kneale

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#:a (tagged and captioned):  b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
#Overall: 
#:a Pass/Fail: --Rmky87 03:21, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA review

message: The claim made here (taken from Andrew Pixley) that “The Quatermass Experiment was the first adult television science-fiction production” is contradicted by the Wikipedia article on R.U.R., which states “On 11 February 1938, a thirty-five minute adaptation of a section of the play was broadcast on BBC Television – the first piece of television science-fiction ever to be broadcast.” R.U.R. is undoubtedly science fiction, undoubtedly an adult play, and was definitely on before The Quatermass Experiment; my feeling is that the claim could be struck out here without diminishing Kneale’s stature in the T.V. pantheon. It might be that the intention was to claim that this was the first original science fiction drama, but the quote from Pixley doesn’t say that. Jock123 (talk) 06:35, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  First adult science fiction…? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Nigel Kneale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070302221228/http://www.museum.tv:80/archives/etv/Q/htmlQ/quartermass/quartermass.htm to http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/Q/htmlQ/quartermass/quartermass.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060223071650/http://www.bfi.org.uk:80/features/tv/100/list/prog.php?id=73 to http://www.bfi.org.uk/features/tv/100/list/prog.php?id=73
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051031164057/http://www.bbc.co.uk:80/cult/news/cult/2005/03/31/18177.shtml to http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/news/cult/2005/03/31/18177.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070709071951/http://www.bfi.org.uk:80/features/tv/100/list/prog.php?id=75 to http://www.bfi.org.uk/features/tv/100/list/prog.php?id=75
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:19, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I made this Nigel Kneale bibliography, which might be of interest. Perhaps it should be added to "External Links"?
http://kristian.anapnea.net/quatermass/kneale/
Kristian  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.210.211.216 (talk) 00:44, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Nigel Kneale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061128012507/http://news.independent.co.uk/people/obituaries/article1948184.ece to http://news.independent.co.uk/people/obituaries/article1948184.ece
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071001050539/http://news.independent.co.uk/media/article1945772.ece to http://news.independent.co.uk/media/article1945772.ece
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:48, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: After reading this article, I am concerned that it does not meet the featured article criteria anymore. Some of my concerns are outlined below:
*Large sections in the article that can be trimmed or broken up into subheadings
*Inconsistent formatting, where some books are listed in Further Reading, and others are not. 
*IMDB used as a source, when it is unreliable per WP:RS/P
Is anyone interested in bringing this back to FA standards? Z1720 (talk) 23:57, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  FA concerns 

message: Message below copied from my talk page. — Manticore 00:20, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth disputed 

message: There's a fine psychological short horror story, The Photograph, by Nigel Kneale. It doesn't appear in the bibliography, so is this the same writer? I wonder if he wrote more in that genre. Shtove (talk) 05:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short story