Talk:Grail Movement

message: This is sick, and they arent even the original cult. Its just an offspring of the real thing. So find out what the main cult is then you can find out more about this cult?   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.56.33.181 (talk) 09:04, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

message: i find it very odd that we have here an article on a religious sect with absolutely no mention of their particular beliefs and tenetsToyokuni3 (talk) 21:33, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Beliefs?

message: Well, I had never heard of the group but I am sure there will be plenty of people taking a closer look. Does, anyone know of the "secret teaching/beliefs" that led to this inhumane behavior?PEACETalkAbout (talk) 02:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: June 2008

message: There is an "International Grail Movement" that predates by almost 30 years the so-called Grail movement described here. The International Grail Movement is an international, interfaith women's movement that was begun by Catholic women in 1921. According to the web site Grail at Cornwall-on-Hudson,  they are "committed to spiritual search, social transformation, ecological sustainability and the release of women's energy throughout the world."
I have heard from Grail members that they are disturbed by the appearance of this other disturbing information as the only mention of Grail movement in wikipedia. But they are not people familiar with editing wikipedia. I also am unfamiliar with what is required to create a disambiguation page.
A disambiguation page needs to be created in order to distinguish these organizations. There is plenty of information available on the web to provide references for the earlier, women's Grail movement. I'm willing to write that page.
Prairiefyre (talk) 17:24, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concern re: disambiguation 

message: I've reverted the article back to 02:53, June 23, 2008 to undo a series of major deletions of sourced material made without explanation. If there's anything with a source in the article that doesn't belong please give a reason.   Will Beback  talk   05:51, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletions 

message: Can someone with some knowledge of the case please clean that up.  It's unreadable right now. --Cabazap (talk) 06:26, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  falsified 

message: I notice the big "WikiProject Christianity" thing on the talk page, and yet no mention of Christ or Jesus on the main article or its talk page. Either "WikiProject Christianity" needs to be removed or Christianity needs to be added to the main article. Doubledragons (talk) 19:15, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a Christian offshoot or not? 

message: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pearlmaam (talk • contribs) 16:35, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Please disregard the above requested move.  It was made in error.Pearlmaam (talk) 20:39, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Disregard Requested Move

message: Addressing the issues listed:
Various updates & clarifications to restore neutrality have been undertaken over a period of time
Multiple CleanUp actions & revisions have been undertaken
This article has been rewritten and edited by Grail Movement members and Wikipedia members, seeking to adhere to quality standards
Additional citations have been added for content verification purposes. I am happy to provide more if and when required
Thank you for your assistance - Emmisgood 
--------------------------------------------------------------------Emmisgood (talk) 09:04, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates & Clarifications 

message: Not a word of truth about the Messiah of the Tyrol? Seriously? Just compare the two quotes! He lied through his teeth, err, fingers. Yup, journalists have read what he wrote. That way they knew about his messianic claims. I did not read the claims about knights in armor, but those could have been sarcasm (satirical). Since he wrote he is the Messiah, they must have thought  The journalists were deriding him and they let him know it. That's why he complained in the Message of the Grail that he was  The journalists noticed that he made larger than life claims about himself. One man's religion is another man's laughing stock.
Note: in EU his book is public domain, and in the US the use of quotes falls under fair use. So, of course, I own the book: in my country everyone owns it. That's what "public domain" means: all the public owns it. If you don't like it, your sole remedy is to never set foot in the EU. Since if you had set foot in the EU you have recognized my intellectual property of the book. I own the copyright for the book, same as every other EU inhabitant. There's no need to pay me money for it, since you can always find an EU inhabitant who is entitled to donate this book to you. Should I say  Tgeorgescu (talk) 09:59, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  From the horse's mouth 

message: When true believers were deleting the information like they were obsessed, citing multiple WP:RS was needed in order to show that it is not the opinion of one nutty professor, but a widely shared view inside the academia. tgeorgescu (talk)  12:26, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overcite