lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cherokee Mental Health Institute

message: The United States goverment, an agency thereof, a State goverment or an agency thereof can not be slandered under the law that pertains to slader and libel. The Cherokee Mental Health Institute is a goverment agency, reporting to and under the authority of the Iowa Department Of Human Services (executive branch). I'm going to work to improve this article to include the facts about it, the abusive restraints practices, the illegal use of chemical restraints, the poor living conditions of the patients, and abusive practices of state employees. Effort will be made to include sources such as the Des Moines Register report (which did not exclude Cherokee or it's patients). Let the employee hide behind "confidentiality" laws which makes reporting and discovering abuse and conditions in the MHI extremly hard to impossible, we will just work harder and longer, like we have done for years.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 23:35, 3 March 2007 (talk • contribs) RBLakes
:RBLAkes, please follow policy and sign talk page postings. Also convention is to add new threads to bottom of talk pages. Fine that you state your intentions as to what you feel the article lacks. Whilst you refer to protection against slander, remember wikipedia is  not a soapbox, nor somewhere to actually carry out any form of arguing or debate. As just an encyclopaedia, we must only report in a NPOV manner on thrid party notable opinions or facts, verifying by providing citations from reliable sources... David Ruben  Talk  14:29, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: True - the policies and guidelines linked above are accepted community-wide, and editors do need to follow the Wikipedia:Five pillars. David Ruben  Talk  01:37, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Further editing intentions

message: This material is probably a copy of some pamphlet or local history -- references to "here" and so on.  In any event, blanket statements about patients not being treated as human and so on need sourcing.  We all know awful things happened in such places, but honest remembrance of past wrongs requires careful sourcing, not sweeping dramatic statements.  I have removed the most obviously inappropriate material.  The earlier discussions about slander and so on have nothing to do with anything. EEng (talk) 20:22, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsources, heavily editorializing, probably copyvio
Talk:Shakira Caine

message: The entry does not meet the criteria for notability as has not enduring notability evidenced by significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic.
BhadraV (talk) 21:04, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think the woman in this photograph (:File:Sir Michael Caine, 28th EFA Awards 2015, Berlin.jpg) is Shakira Caine. It's a much better picture. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (talk) 20:11, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better picture 

message: I don't believe that she is named correctly on this page. As Sir Michael was 'knighted', rather than referred to as "Sir" due to inheriting a title, she would not be "Lady Caine" at all. She is simply Shakira Caine, nee Baksh. PunkAndromeda (talk) 09:32, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect name
Talk:Shakti Kapoor

message: I noticed that the word "commerical" is misspelled in the references. The title of the article it links to is also misspelled, so I don't imagine it should be changed; I just wanted to make a note of this Idontknowwhatshappening (talk) 06:16, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Commerical" in references
Talk:Shamari DeVoe

message: Phrases like "began cultivating her soulful voice at the tender age of three" do not belong in an article on wikipedia.  Desertsky85451 00:48, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  tone warning 
Talk:Boulders (album)

message: , thanks for your contributions. I see you changed the side headings from 'Side one'/'two' to 'Side 1'/'2'. I know that's how they're written on the original vinyl but it doesn't quite look right to me, and I've just consulted several Featured Articles to see if 'Side 1'/2' is the norm for albums that originally used numerals on the sleeve and it isn't the case. Is this a policy somewhere? Or else I will revert to the English spellings.--TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 17:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I only changed it for consistency (from 'Side one'/'2'). I didn't see guidance as to which was preferred so I went with what was on the sleeve. I have no objection to replacing the numerals with words. --JB525 (talk) 23:12, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Side names
Talk:Boys and Girls in America

message: This is one amazing album. Shrodes 09:22, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: it says it received 5 stars but it really was rated 3 and a half stars http://www.rollingstone.com/music/albumreviews/boys-and-girls-in-america-20060921  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Born2booze09 (talk • contribs) 14:49, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rolling Stone rating is wrong 
Talk:Shan Sa

message: The sentence "It won the Goncourt Prize for high school students" implies that this was an award given to student authors. In fact the Prix Goncourt des Lyceens is a prize voted upon by secondary school students, but the honorees are of any age. Shan Sa was 28 and already known for her previous novels when she won it. Also, because it is an award voted by teenagers, it is probably not the most prestigious award she's won and therefor not the one most deserving of being listed in the opening paragraph.
Chiwito (talk) 07:22, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Brainfreeze (album)

message: Removed stub tag. Beginning of 'History' section seems broke:
Brainfreeze (Sixty7 Recordings). The CD
Will do some more clean-up later. MKV 20:42, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

message: This page is old and was hidden since 2012. It needs some citations and to be updated so its more informative.--Jimmyjrg (talk) 14:04, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2020 - Pages needs to be cleaned up
Talk:Shane (actress)

message: An RfC which may affect this article's title is currently taking place (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pornography#RfC: Should a person who has appeared in exclusively pornographic films be described as "(actor/-tress)" or "(pornographic actor/-tress)"?). Rebecca1990 (talk) 07:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  (actress)/(pornographic actress) RfC
Talk:Reggiane Re.2001 Falco II

message: Another example of Bzuk's no-a-bit-censorship. No explainings made and i am now REAL BORED. REAL BORED. REAL BORED.--Stefanomencarelli 12:15, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

message: The target of the action on 12 August 1942 was definitely HMS Victorious, which was participating on Operation Pedestal at the time. However, the description of the Re.2001 G/V in the Variants section notes its use in Operation Harpoon. I suspect that this is an error and have changed the text accordingly; but if anyone has a source that confirms the G/V's use against Operation Harpoon, please correct me! --Rlandmann 01:38, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Operation Harpoon
Talk:Breaking Away (Tantrum album)

message: Breaking Away was also the name of a 1986 album by UK singer Jaki Graham that rose to #25 in the UK albums chart -- Gilgamesh007 (talk) 11:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breaking Away (album)
Talk:Shane Atkinson

message: Looks like Shane And Lance both appear in the Shane Atkinson article. I think they should be split or article should separate into 2 sections, 1 for Shane and 1 for Lance. 
Anyway more news on Lance recently
* Email super-spammer fined $16m by MARISSA CALLIGEROS. December 1, 2009 http://www.smh.com.au/technology/security/email-superspammer-fined-16m-20091201-k1sc.html
* NZ born spammer in court after 100,000 complaints. 7:34 PM Wednesday Dec 16, 2009 http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5&objectid=10615930
Linnah (talk) 16:49, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lance Atkinson
Talk:Shane Battier

message: Would someone please update Shane's player photo, preferably with one from the Heat (or Duke :-) ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.130.89.76 (talk) 18:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions for Shane Battier Page 
Talk:Brian Jones Presents The Pipes of Pan at Joujouka

message: I have reverted your edit because you are pushng a point of view - if nothing else, justify your position. Though you assert (rightly) that F. Rynne clearly had nothing to do with Brian Jones or the album recorded by the latter (he would have been a child at the time, just like Bachir Attar), that is not the point. The point is that the musicians currently recording under the name "Master Musicians of Joujouka" are one of the two groups that came into being in the late 1970s (exact date unknown- maybe you can help) as a result of a split. The other group calls itself "Master Musicians of Jajouka". Both are legitimate heirs to the common heritage of the Master Musicians. Both are entitled to a listing on Wikipedia, on equal terms. Each group has its own page, which should reflect its specific history post-split. The Brian Jones album is the heritage of both groups, and therefore both deserve a link on that page. Jonur 17:00, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note to anonymous US user 

message: I have looked in for the first time today in a long time and saw the edits by the anonymous user mentioned by Jonur. I will be looking in at this page later today after reviewing my notes and articles, and will be trying to footnote and adjust both articles and the band articles for POV. I will review what has been going on at the time I finish my footnote work and comment then if needed. I started to say more but I'm not sure what all sorts of edits have been made by people in the past couple of weeks other than probably some contentious ones were probably made. Emerman 01:16, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: recent article history 

message: I am thinking that the statement about this being the "first world music album" is incorrect. Check out Bali: Music from the Morning of the World, recording by David Lewiston in 1966 and released in 1967. This predates Brian Jones' LP in both the recording date and release date. http://www.amazon.com/Bali-Music-Morning-Various-Artists/dp/B000083GHL
:Given that "world music" is a virtually meaningless marketing term, hopelessly parochial and PoV, I'd like to see it disappear from the article altogether. --Mel Etitis  (Talk) 07:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First World Music Album? 

message: were they led by this guy abdelsam haj attar then, only see him refered to later articles. after the 74 split. i may be wrong but pov???? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 134.226.1.194 (talk) 01:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  led by pov?????

message: This page is now a double-redirect.  Please change the target to Brian Jones Presents the Pipes of Pan at Joujouka (or just remove the protection, since the dispute that gave rise to it was well over a year ago). --Russ (talk) 11:57, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  Cheers.  --lifebaka (talk - contribs) 16:11, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  double-redirect
Talk:Storm Management

message: Per their own webpage they never use Storm Models anywhere other than the url for their web page. Most places they use just the word "Storm" but for thier mailing address they give Storm Model Management. The other page under the correct name needs a lot of work, but this should then be merged into it. Doc ♬ talk 00:35, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to correct name

message: This and other Wikipedias in other languages have been relentlessly spammed by anonymous IPs based in Israel (where the domain is registered) for many months. It's gotten sufficiently bad as to warrant addition to the spam blacklist and I have removed a number of these links in anticipation of blacklisting:
*Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam#modelsobserver.com (permanent link)
*:meta:Talk:Spam blacklist#modelsobserver.com (permanent link)
Most, but not all, had been added by the site-owner.
If an established, high-volume editor sees value to the specific link I deleted from this article, please let me know and it can be evaluated for addition to the spam "whitelist"
--A. B. (talk •  contribs)  03:22, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: modelsobserver.com links

message: Is this article about models currently represented by this agency, or all models who have ever been represented? If the former, should there be a separate list for past models? If the latter, should there be separate sections for both? --‖ Ebyabe talk - Inspector General ‖ 13:18, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope of article
Talk:Shane Connor

message: Port Adelaide 193.115.85.146 (talk) 03:54, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth Place
Talk:Brighter Than a Thousand Suns (album)

message: need more information, reviews, and production stuff --J miester25 (talk) 15:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs more information
Talk:Talk page

message: Retargeted to MediaWiki following a merge (diff) of content from this version of Talk page. –Black Falcon (Talk) 02:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That should have been a link to some meaningful subsection. I did so with an anchor, now. -- Tomdo08 (talk) 20:22, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  MediaWiki 

message: The so-called [ merge] (see previous section MediaWiki and message boxes at top) was rather a three-quarter delete. A lot of good content vanished (fortunately it still is accessable in the history). Did nobody think of a sister project? And what happened to "splitting too long articles", the thing what should be done to MediaWiki? The [ old Talk Page article] was a nearly perfect side article to MediaWiki, obviously notable because of MediaWiki being notable. I had a look into the 2008 discussion, where the malady originated, and I shudder because of the destructive shortsightedness. The 2009 discussion regarding Talkpage was so much better and even found the old material of Talk page, but missed the opportunity: Now MediaWiki will grow, partly reinventing the wheel, until someday something will be externalized into side articles, maybe Talk page or MediaWiki talk page, maybe MediaWiki namespace. My counsel would have been to move now historic [ Talk page] to MediaWiki talk page. -- Tomdo08 (talk) 21:27, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  So-called merge with MediaWiki, old content
Talk:Shane Cullinan

message: would a picture of Shane in color (if it exists) be better than the one in monochrome? 198.110.115.186 (talk) 15:54, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture change?
Talk:Shane Dorian

message: Is he a professional surfer or a competitive surfer? RJFJR 21:07, 9 December 2006(UTC)
I don't believe he is officially a competitive surfer since retiring from the WCT, and I could not find  information on any competitions he has entered (if there are any) since leaving the WCT. However, he may still be considered a professional given his affiliation with Billabong. This relationship could probably be explained more. Mikeg1179 13:42, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bring Yer Wellies

message: The recorded date for this album according to the article is 2001.  It was released in 2006.  Can that possibly be right? --Wydok 04:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recorded Date correct?

message: the text says 2007, the box on the right 2006  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.46.10.195 (talk) 18:51, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Release Date in box isn't the same as in the text
Talk:Broadcast (Cutting Crew album)

message: So, the album was released in the U.K. on a Saturday??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.215.182.167 (talk) 04:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a source for a different date? I am no expert, but the date was unsourced and The BPI certification carries the date 20 October 1986, so I used that.--Muhandes (talk) 07:48, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date
Talk:Shane Ellen

message: I found :Image:Adelaide90s.png and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:Adelaide90s.png]]
Talk:Broken Barricades

message: The currently stated release date of June 11, 1971 may be correct for the UK release, but in the US it had already made the best-selling Albums charts in the May 8 issue of Billboard, which went on-sale May 1. The April 10 issue of Cash Box says '"Broken Barricades", Procol Harum's new A&M album will ship same week they begin their U.S. tour April 3'. So I have changed the release date in the Info Box from June 11 to April. April 3 was a Saturday - I don't know what day of the week was usual for new releases. It made UK album charts week of July 3. PatConolly (talk) 06:49, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release Date
Talk:Broken Silence (album)

message: WP treats Brooklyn's Don Diva as a mixtape, but it is being sold commercially (CD and download) through all the usual outlets, and is not available as a mixtape as far as I can see. 86.187.46.185 (talk) 14:44, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brooklyn's Don Diva ... fourth solo album / fifth album? 

message: Oh Yeah contains a sample of Toots and the Maytals. That should be mentioned, but for some reason it was removed. Grushenka (talk) 19:20, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sample
Talk:Shane Horgan

message: I tried to format Shane's list of caps for Ireland U21, Ireland A etc, it now looks fine when  I view it in Firefox, but when I look at the page using Safari on a phone, the formatting is off... 
Aberdeen01 15:11, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Formatting table of international caps.
Talk:Shane Kelly

message: Since I am about to (again) remove publicity text taken directly from Shane Kelly or his agent, I think I should explain myself.
Biographies on Wikipedia are not the same as personal publicity. And it is Wikipedia policy for people not to edit their own entries. See Wikipedia:Autobiography.
Also, the text supplied is not written in encyclopedic style. Phases like "incredibly", "testament to his perseverance and true sportsmanship" or "the race of truth" are value judgements and do not (in my opinion) belong in an encyclopedia article. See Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
This is not meant to disrespect Shane Kelly, who I admire as an athlete. But it is about what is appropriate for Wikipedia. Look at the Wikipedia article for any other athlete, or indeed any other well known person. I think you will judge that what I (mainly) have written has been fair, and consistent with Wikipedia style.
By the way, it IS perfectly appropriate insert a link to an athlete's personal profile or home page. I suggest you add that, instead of removing the entire Wikipedia text and substituting it with Kelly's own personal profile.
Rocksong 06:11, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text supplied by Shane Kelly 
Talk:Shane Lee

message: Can we please find some other way to refer to maiden names? The term 'nee' is not only over-used, it's also quite a pompous term. I'm sick of seeing the word absolutely everywhere, especially considering the fact that it's not actually a valid English word.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fudge-o (talk • contribs) 11:09, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overuse of 'nee'
Talk:Elmley Castle

message: I just edited this article for readability and clarity, without adding any real content. I know nothing of the actual subject. I did check the "Earl of Warwick" article. Several Earls of Warwick are in fact surnamed "Beauchamp," but I cannot correlate them explicitly with the Beauchamp of Elmley Castle. The article remains ambiguous with respect to this. I cannot tell whether our Beauchamp was the rightful Warwick, a failed pretender, or a successful replacement. Arch dude 00:40, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beauchamp? 
Talk:Shane Matthews

message: Brand-new user "Justicegator" is trying to add a mention of someone named Michael Shane Matthews being convicted of a federal crime, but I highly doubt it's the same Mr. Matthews who's the subject of this article. This Shane Matthews is a well-known former star QB and current high school coach and sports media personality, yet there's absolutely no media mention of this case, which the linked court documents state was adjudicated back in June. How could that possibly be? This Shane getting in serious legal trouble would literally be front-page news across Florida, but there's nary a peep. So stop adding it unless there's some well-sources and verified third-party connection, as including scandalous stuff like this without proof is a serious violation of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Thanks. --Zeng8r (talk) 18:01, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mysterious federal charges
Talk:Built by Blood

message: Somalia is located horn africa people is called somalian  Abdulwahab adam weheliye (talk) 12:38, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  somalia
Talk:Bull of the Woods

message: This article needs rewriting, it's very informal and un-Wiki
--78.144.151.253 (talk) 13:13, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I addressed a number of issues that I saw with this article, and propose removing both of the templates requesting improvements. I will wait a few days for additional input. Frankzappatwin (talk) 22:05, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Templates
Talk:Bullet for My Valentine (EP)

message: The bit that says the track listing is in the wrong order is untrue, I have the EP, I'm removing this. 62.255.148.217 15:35, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shane Richie

message: Some information, but not enough for a complete article.  Burzmali 15:49, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sort

message: Hey, I was just wondering why there wasnt any details about his affair with Alison Hall? As seen in the Mirror and the Daily Mail. MisterShiney (talk) 16:49, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless there are better (ie non-tabloid) sources for this, it is unlikely we could mention it. --John (talk) 16:51, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Whilst I appreciate that a single tabloid newspaper would not be reliable source, however his wifes book also mentions the affair. It just seems inappropriate that there isnt anything here. Considering. MisterShiney (talk) 16:58, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Affair...? 

message: I have deleted the unsourced claim about Richie appearing on Blind Date; he was expressly asked about it on BBC Radio 4's Loose Ends (and in the context of his WP article, too) and denied it categorically; although he was amused by the story. JezGrove (talk) 19:59, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blind Date claim