lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Friday Night Football (AFL)

message: Friday night football (rugby league) is broadcast in Victoria. It's after the AFL. So it's not just Northern Territory.
I haven't seen anything to say that Seven will broadcast AFL in Syd/Bris when they regain the rights. They didn't when they had them before, and it would be ratings suicide to do so. 
Quaidy 06:28, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Alexandra Tydings

message: This article is a disaster but I'm at a loss as to what to do about it. If I delete the non-notable fanzine-esque content it seems like very little will be left in the article. Be that as it may, I know it's the appropriate actions to take. If someone has more information about Tydings that is encyclopedic, please add it! Pacian 06:28, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pizza Haven (Australia)

message: I just thought I'd like to mention, as of May 2006 there is still a Pizza Haven store situated on a small block on the main road of Princes Freeway between the Footscray and Williamstown-Altona zones in Victoria, Australia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.28.35.126 (talk • contribs) 
Hi i just cleaned it up to get rid of inaccuracies and just plain crap.4 stores in SA WTF? try about 20 although its being pushed out in the city its still strong in Regional areas in SA, i know there is one here on king st in Port Lincoln.
Im surprised that this article wasnt cleaned up early. -Red under the bed
:Cite references and dont put POV --Mikecraig 20:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Uh...I agree. So why did you remove all the "citation needed" tags and "sources needed" tags I placed there?? wikipediatrix 21:36, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If the American Pizza Haven is in no way related to the Australian Pizza Haven, shouldn't it be a separate article? GK1 15:54, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pizza Haven (US) 

message: Please follow WP policy regarding articles, they are not to be used to promote or advertise companies or products in question. --Mikecraig 21:59, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article is not for advertising/promoting company
Talk:United States Army Berlin

message: "Units Locations" should be renamed to "Unit Locations". "Clay Compound" and "Clay Headquartes Compound" should be renamed to "Gen. Lucius D. Clay Headquarters", as this Compound be named by the USCOB. --84.161.6.145 16:44, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Units Locations

message: The 6941st Guard Battalion was neither a part of the US-Berlin Brigade, nor a part of the US-Army. The 6941st Guard Battalion was part of the Civilian Support Groups (CSG) Germany, attached to the USAREUR. Employees of the 6941st Gd Bn were civilian LNs (Local Nationals) and civilians from NATO and other non-communist cuuntries. See http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/6941st_Guard_Battalion --84.161.6.145 16:44, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Troop Units Assigned to USCOB/USAB

message: Link "6941st Guard Battalion - US Army Berlin Brigade" should be renamed to "6941st Guard Battalion - Employees Website", becaus of its non- or para-military status. --84.161.6.145 16:44, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: External links
Talk:Infiltration (hydrology)

message: I think Infiltration should remain as a separate entry. It is an important concept in the planning and design of Sustainable urban drainage systems. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Willow4 (talk • contribs) 26 May 2006
Infiltration is certainly not the same as permeability. That is complete rubbish, and I'll remove that suggestion immediately. Mwtoews 16:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: shouldnt we have some text in this article regarding the role of chemical contents of infiltrating water, eg processes of adsorption of some chemical species on soil particles and the inverse of dissolving some chemicals which are already absorbed or adsorbed in the soil? Anlace 22:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Relation to chemical content

message: Another infiltration equation is the Kostiakov equation. I don't have the details handy, but believe it has a similar approach as Horton
Rwos 16:34, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kostiakov 

message: I do not think that the "Infiltration calculation methods" introductory paragraph is correct. With the exception of the first subheading the remaining subheadings are not "estimation methods" but instead are expressions to represent the process of infiltration.
Estimation methods would include procedures to calibrate one of the infiltration equations against field measurements such as matching the Horton equation to infiltrometer measurements.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by GILDog (talk • contribs) 06:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infiltration Calculation Methods 
Talk:II Corps (United States)

message: The US II Corps formed part of the British First Army in the North African Campaign, yet the article does not make this clear.  Could someone please look at this? Duarcain (talk) 21:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  British First Army 

message: It would be nice to have the list of the subordinate units of II Corps, especially during WWII  --rogerd (talk) 23:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_the_subordinate_units_of_the_us_7Th_army_during_World_War_2 is a partial answer, except I don't think it is a reliable source.  rogerd (talk) 23:04, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure during WWII 

message: I think there is some confusion in the WWI paragraph.  The paragraph ends with the statement "Ultimately, the overall battle [Second Battle of the Somme] resulted in the German Army being pushed back to the Hindenburg Line, from which they would launch their spring offensive."  The Second Battle of the Somme took place in late-Aug to early-Sept 1918.  Obviously, the Armistice took effect just 60 plus days later - 11 Nov 1918.  There were to be no more Springs to the war at that point, so there was no German Spring Offensive after Sept 1918.
98.255.89.22 (talk) 20:12, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWI Chronology
Talk:VI Corps (United States)

message: This articles states the Corps was finally inactivated in 1962. However he Arlington National Cemenery article about Major General John Ramsey Pugh (1909-1994)  says Pugh commanded the VI. Corps between 1964 and 1966. One of the twoi statements must be wrong. WAG57 (talk) 08:13, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inactivation
Talk:VII Corps (United States)

message: The article lists George V. H. Moseley as the CO of the 502nd PIR in the Order of Battle.  But the name links to an article on a George Moseley who would have been 70 years old in 1944 -- maybe a relative, but surely not an airborne officer. W. B. Wilson 17:55, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  George Moseley and 502nd PIR 

message: The statement that VII "corps broke through the Siegfried Line and endured heavy fighting in the Battle of Hürtgen Forest" doesn't make sense to me on two grounds: the 'Bloody Forest' was part of the Siegfried Line, and it was the 78th Infantry Division and 8th Armored Division in XIX Corps that broke through. Pyrrho17 (talk) 23:13, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corps participation in Siegfried Line fighting
Talk:X Corps (United States)

message: The novel "The Ten Thousand" by Harold Coyle is built around an Anabasis-like fighting retreat from Czechoslovakia to the region around Bremerhaven carried out by a fictional version of the 10th Corps comprised of a US 55th Mechanized Infantry Division and a US 4th Armored Division. Would like others opinion on if this is worth adding. Graham1973 (talk) 10:48, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: In Fiction
Talk:Elizabeth Hess

message: I don't have any idea why the page for this actress who starred in Clarissa Explains it All redirected to the Scripps National Spelling Bee article, but I've removed it. Pacian 06:45, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Pacian, I've been working on redirecting all of the names of past national spelling bee champions to the list of winners in the past. When I first started the Elizabeth Hess article, there was nothing there, so I assumed that Hess the actress was not significant historically. Therefore, I inserted a redirection to the spelling bee article. If you'd like to write the article about the actress, I can add a disambiguation notice at the top of the article. — † Webdinger BLAH | SZ 16:43, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:XVIII Airborne Corps

message: No mention of the number of troops? This is important! Is it 2,000 or 15,000 or 80,000 or 250,000?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.45.242 (talk) 05:16, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: troop strength

message: I was able to find the Commanding General's bio here and the Deputy CG here and the Command Sergeant Major here --rogerd 02:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, after I put that edit summary up I guessed that the CSM would be at the same address as the CG, but at the page named csm.htm . I guessed right, even though it isn't in the index. --rogerd 03:05, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  current command staff 

message: We did a hell of a good job in Afghanistan (at least while my unit was there from 2002-2003 in Bagram Afghanistan even stopped "aniversary attacks" in fact); why is there no mention of any of this in the article? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.224.3.242 (talk • contribs) 
:If you have some sources detailing the corps' deployment to Afghanistan, please be bold and edit the article yourself. If you'd prefer someone else do it, or if you need help with grammar/spelling/use of Wikipedia syntax, I can help. Parsecboy 19:19, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Afghanistan

message: According to http://www.forscom.army.mil/cmd_staff/orgchart/OrganizationalChart.htm, the only subordinate division that the 18th Airborne Corps has is the 82nd Airborne Corps. Anyone know different. The website is official for FORSCOM. Mrshankly01 (talk) 17:26, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Subordinate Units
Talk:Matt Kennedy Gould

message: The article states that Matt didn't audition for the Joe Schmo Show, but I don't think that's quite accurate. It's true he was picked out by the producers at a basketball game, but afterwards he went through some kind of audition process. They've got it on the DVD. I don't know how to fix the article, though.... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.210.70.20 (talk • contribs) .
:Well, see, that's the catch... He did go through an "audition", but wasn't that audition actually faked? (I thought they did that so they could pre-introduce him to 'the best friend'?) Bladestorm 19:50, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:XXIV Corps (United States)

message: U.S. Army history does not mention Fort Hood as the site of reactivation of XXIV Corps in 1968.  XXIV Corps was reactivated by orders of General William Westmoreland in Saigon, and the reactivation was in Phu Bai, site of the already-existing Provisional Corps, Vietnam.  (See http://www.history.army.mil/books/Vietnam/northern/nprovinces-ch4.htm).  
The article also does not mention that Provisional Corps, Vietnam was a redesignation of MACV Forward which was established during Tet of 1968.  Gen, Westmoreland ordered its creation on 25 January 1968 under the command of Gen. Creighton Abrams.  It deployed to Phu Bai on 9 February 1968.  MACV Forward was redesignated as Provisional Corps, Vietnam on 10 March 1968, under the command of Lt. Gen. William B. Rosson.
Lynn D. Miller
(formerly 1LT, MI, US Army, stationed at XXIV Corps Oct. 1968-Oct. 1969)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.187.124 (talk) 19:13, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

message: I was part of the orginal men sent to Phu bai to take the base over from the marines. The nick name came from the Beatles album popular at the time.     Joe Tate  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.97.132.115 (talk) 18:48, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  unit nickname. Sargent Peppers Lonly Hearts club..  

message: The XXIV Corps of the Union Army is the same thing as the XXIV Corps of the United States Army. The XXIV Corps of the U.S. Army was activated during the American Civil War, World War II and the Vietnam War.
:Per the U.S. Army they are not the same thing. The Army traces XXIV Corps' history back to World War II only. See "Army Corps, Divisions, and Separate Brigades" (Army Lineage Series) p. 106. Intothatdarkness 15:17, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Union Army = United States Army
Talk:Edward C. Reed High School

message: A couple of years ago the students put Reed up on eBay for million bucks or something. That was a bitof fun.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.100.48.232 (talk) 01:18, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing about the school getting sold? 
Talk:5th Infantry Division (United States)

message: I don't know if the section regarding the World War II was written this way intentionally, but the following line has been inserted into the text:
The 5th ID became the first Allied unit to cross the Rhine River on the night of 22 March 1945. (The Rhine was crossed at Remagen on 7,8,9 March 1945, 9th Armoured Division, units of 9th ID and 78th ID) After capturing some 19,000 German soldiers, the division continued to Frankfurt-am-Main, clearing and policing the town and its environs, 27–29 March.
The bold is in the text on the article page.  This statement seems confusing, and based on some of the erroneous edits that are in the history of this page it would seem that this was one that was missed.  I am not arguing about the information, but the format should be fixed so there aren't two conflicting dates.Kintrix (talk) 10:03, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improper edit? 

message: I have removed this section, (a) because Rottman's data, on page 31 of his book, does not specify which battalions were part of each brigade; and (b) because it is not 1989. It is 1988 or before; his book was published in 1988. I will copy this note, as with the others, to the current, main talkpage discussion. Buckshot06 (talk) 01:11, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have again regretfully had to make a slightly rude total revert on 's last edit to this page; Gordon Rottman's data, 1988, does not support or verify assignment of battalions to individual maneuver brigades in 1989. Buckshot06 (talk) 00:22, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  1989 listing of units
Talk:Culture Club

message: Somehow, I got logged-out before I deleted the section, so it only shows my IP 71.221.249.215
This section contained no "Legal /Personal Issues" of Culture Club (The subject of this article). There were two items about Boy George which happened long after his departure from CC, and one item about Mikey Craig. None of the three were "Legal /Personal Issues" of Culture Club.
The information is already existing on Boy George's and Mikey Craig's pages respectively. It does not belong here.
Joe Hepperle (talk) 20:21, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joe Hepperle (me) deleted "Legal /Personal Issues" section 
Talk:Borovo, Croatia

message: I think it is legitimate to mention alternate official name and spelling of Trpinja in Serbian Cyrillic alphabet in this article lead section and infobox. I invite all interested editors who might have different arguments toshare them also on  Talk:Minority language#Minority languages ​​in geographical articles.--MirkoS18 (talk) 20:32, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Serbian Cyrillic alphabet]] in lead section and infobox
Talk:199th Infantry Brigade (United States)

message: I know it looks redundant to have the U.S. in the middle of the name of the regiment, however, the U.S. is not just a country designator like it is for the rest of the units on Wikipedia that was tacked on for clarity's sake.  The U.S. in the 3rd U.S. Infantry Regiment is actually part of its official name and needs to be included in order for it to be considered correct and accurate.  This is the case with very few units in the U.S. Army, but exceptions do exist and this is one of them.  This has come at the end of a very heated discussion over this very topic at the Military History WikiProject, afterwhich it was decided that accuracy should never be sacrificed for the sake of consistency with other U.S. units, particularly since this unit and its name are different than the units they're being compared with.  --ScreaminEagle 14:57, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd U.S. Infantry 
Talk:Baby Mario

message: Someone already attempted to redirect the article, but anon users just went and added info back in, so off to merger tags it goes.  I think this is pretty much a simple and straightforward thing.  Content is already in the Mario article from this article. Kevin Breitenstein 07:14, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: Okay, there's two kinds of artwork for Baby Mario in Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time. One kind depicts him in red shoes. However, it's clearly a mistake, as the screenshots at the time the artwork has been released has him with blue shoes. So the artwork has subsequently been released with him in blue shoes. Do you think we should replace the current Partners in Time artwork with one that has blue shoes? I found this image that has the blue shoes version. - NES Boy 22:08, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shoes 

message: I'm wondering if we could take the Baby luigi section from the Luigi article and merge it here? Bluebrody7 05:07, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Baby Luigi
Talk:Mousse (Ranma ½)

message: I was hoping someone could help me here, does anyone know of any characters who have ever trained blindfolded or who are blind already? I'm thinking that Mousse might try training with a variety of people to expand his skills beyond dark magic as additional assets. Tyciol 07:18, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Check out Shiryu the dragon saint from the Saint Seiya series; he's experienced fighting blind since he always pokes his eyes out or is blinded by his enemy when he has a major fight.Facer 06:42, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Blind trainers?

message: Does anyone know if Tenten from Naruto is inspired at all by Mousse and Shampoo, or is it simply Chinese cultural traits they share? Onikage725 15:31, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I really don't see any strong resemblances between them, so at best it is cultural similarities. Derekloffin 15:37, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I agree with all those points... I know Naruto's creator was a fan of Dragon Ball and Yu Yu Hakusho and whatnot, maybe Ranma too (why not, plenty of ppl love all four shows). Though I guess it is too speculative to add to this article. Onikage725 11:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tenten

message: Erm... I'm pretty sure this isn't just "hiding things where it's dark". In one episode, he managed to conceal a giant bomb bigger than he was and weighing several tons in his cloak. you'd need some sort of magic powers to pull that off.--Marhawkman (talk) 13:22, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess I'll go fix it, but I was hoping somebody had an idea as to why that got stuck in the article in the first place.--Marhawkman (talk) 06:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dark Magic
Talk:Dalibor Brázda

message: Well, somebody has just obliterated the English version of this page and translated it into German. And it's all pretty bad, in that the links and other Wikifications don't work etc. I will leave it for a day or two and see what happens. I'm quite confused by this. I think I know what might have happened. There is a tribute concert on in Switzerland for the subject of the article (Dalibor Brazda) and it's today (26th May, their time) - so somebody has found the article and decided to translate so everyone in that country can read it. What they should have done is post it on the Deutche Wiki site instead (which it's not). Check the previous edit for the original article (written by me). I am going to change it back in a couple days time. We'll let the German speaking Swiss get some enjoyment out of it meantime. Musicmaker 07:20, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

message: OK - I have now transfered the German version (not created by me) to the German Wiki site, and fixed it up a little bit. Also have restored the English version to this site. What a total pain this exercise has been. Musicmaker 12:11, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transfered to German Wiki 
Talk:Chinese Amazons

message: I'm wondering if they have any royal type of system in place, and if Cologne is indeed ruler, wouldn't that make Shampoo a princess? Tyciol 07:25, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Do the amazons have royalty?

message: Well, if it was to be merge, it should be titled Joketsuzoku since that's the location (Chinese Amazons are the people).  I have no object to a merger. (edit, oops, forgot to put my name down) Derekloffin 19:19, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, the article talks mostly about the Amazon village anyway. Now, who should do it?Facer 16:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  To merge or not to merge
Talk:49th Quartermaster Group

message: greetings,
the page 54th Quartermaster Company recently got created and whilst trying to figure out how to categorize it i came across this page which i think should probably wikilink to it under the section "Subordinate Units".  however as i have no clue about the military could someone who knows what they're talking about please review? cheers Mission Fleg (talk) 09:26, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  54th Quartermaster Company
Talk:Ventureño language

message: By Wikipedia convention, language articles usually have the name "X language", especially if the name of the language is an adjective or if the ethnic group speaking the language is known by the same name. If the tribe who spoke Ventureño are/were also called the Ventureño, then this article should be moved to Ventureño language. —Angr 05:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and moved it. There were already some incoming links to it anyway. —Angr 05:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name

message: Should mention that this language has possibly the most clearly attested base 4 counting system.  I added something to Quaternary numeral system... AnonMoos (talk) 11:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the expansion.  I don't know anything about the language other than having access to the Native American Mathematics book article, so I didn't feel confident in starting such a section here... AnonMoos (talk) 09:15, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Number system

message: In the table of number-words, it's not visually obvious what goes with what.  I'm going to redesign it.
: The numbers 1–16 exhibit certain characteristics which are different from the method of counting from 17 to 32.
It seems to me that the break is at 12, not 17.  Where the construction of a number-phrase is transparent, should we insert a breakdown, or count on the reader to spot the pattern?
* 12 = 3 × 4
* 13 = 3 × 4 + 1
* 15 = 1 less than [16]
* 17 = 16 + 1 (and similarly for 21, 25, 29)
* 18 = 2 less than 20 (and similarly for 22, 26, 30)
* 19 = 1 less than 20 (and similarly for 23, 27, 31)
* 32 = 2 × 16
—Tamfang (talk) 19:57, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  number table 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Buenaventura language. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 11#Buenaventura language until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:59, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Buenaventura language" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :San Buenaventura language. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 12#San Buenaventura language until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:02, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "San Buenaventura language" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]