lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Trey Anastasio with Special Guest Carlos Santana

message: Carlos Santana is one man, not plural. Title should read "Special Guest".
:Moved Milchama 23:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: page title error
Talk:Donovan's Brain

message: Is the plot correct? I have a dutch translation, where it is not Cory, but his assistant Schratt killing the brain with his bare hands..
Karpaat (talk) 15:23, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot? 

message: In the radio adaptation, Dr. Corey (Orson Welles) repeatedly says, "Sure, sure, sure" in Donovan's voice.  Was this plot device used solely for the benefit of the radio audience, to compensate for the missing visuals?24.57.249.250 (talk) 02:54, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sure, sure, sure"
Talk:Category 6: Day of Destruction

message: I read the article and was disappointed that there was minimal discussion about the scientific issues with the miniseries. The lead mentions some controversy over it, but there is very little detail about the flaws in the rest of the article. Do category 6 hurricanes exist? I have only heard of a category 5 hurricane in real life. Has Chicago every been hit by a hurricane? Also, I wanted to read more about hurricanes after looking at this article but I had a hard time finding a link to hurricane. Wronkiew (talk) 00:54, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is minimal discussion because I haven't found any reliable sources discussing the film verses reality. If some can be found, it will be expanded to include that. Category 6 hurricanes are, as far as I know, purely theoretical. I do not think there is any recorded incidence of one. For your second question, Chicago has been hit by the remnants of hurricanes. For a hurricane scenarios as seen in the film (where in the hurricane forms over the great lakes), technically that isn't possible as part of the definition of a hurricane is that its tropical. You might find this article from the NSW interesting as it talks about hurricanes in Michigan and would also relate to chicago and discusses some hurricane like storms that have formed over the great lakes, including "Hurricane Huron". I've added a wikilink to hurricane in the lead to help there. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 01:05, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some areas in need of improvement 

message: "Four-hour miniseries"? 174 minutes is only three hours. 93.136.81.94 (talk) 22:45, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length 
Talk:Category 7: The End of the World

message: ;Reviews
* Variety
* New York Magazine 
* HighDef Digest
* MovieXclusive
* Washington Post
* Hollywood Reporter
* Chicago Tribune
* Chicago Sun Times
* USA Today
* San Jose Mercury News
* Wall Street Journal
* Newsday
* Detroit Free Press
-- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 04:09, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Boa vs. Python

message: Shouldn't this article be entitled: "Boa vs. Python" with an emphasis on the period? (since it is called that upon its corresponding imdb page and what-not)
DrWho42 03:20, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boa ''vs.'' Python 

message: I realize I am probably jumping the gun with this nominee, but I feel its a great way to get proper feedback. TruthCrusader 08:44, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note to GA reviewers
Talk:Decoys (film)

message: I just recently sat down and watched this and from what I gathered, only one of the two protagonist males was looking to lose his virginity in the film, since it seemed kind of implied that the other had slept with a female detective and it was supposed to be kept secret for some strange reason. 71.156.94.2 00:42, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Premise 

message: Umm.. I don't think synopsis means the same thing as the plot.
I mean after reading it you should have at least some idea what the movie is about.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.223.147.182 (talk) 20:58, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synopsis not the plot 

message: Please, editor/writer be specific.
"Elsewhere, Luke Callahan and Roger, two college freshmen and virgins, are desperate ..."
On Campus or St Johnson College, should replace "Elsewhere". 41.114.9.130 (talk) 19:46, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction
Talk:Deep Shock

message: It's entirely possible that Paul Joshua Rubin is a pseudonym for Phillip J. Roth. But we have no cite for that, and "Paul Joshua Rubin" is what's onscreen and at the official site, which has just been added. When Phillip J. Roth gets an article, perhaps with citing that can be explained.--Tenebrae (talk) 22:54, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Credits

message: This article is too short and needs to be expanded in more detail. The plot is too short and needs to be expanded. The production section needs to be added to the article as well.--Paleface Jack (talk) 01:52, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion
Talk:Pterodactyl (film)

message: I switched the title back to "Pterodactyl" (rather than "Pterodactyl: Evil is in the Air") - the official title seems to be just "Pterodactyl", as shown on the sci fi channel web site and the imdb. Shadowsill (talk) 08:34, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: See infobox: Music is unlikely to have been composed by John Dickson, a US politician who died in 1852. --Romney yw (talk) 00:27, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erroneous link 
Talk:Raptor Island

message: 67.9.53.162 05:26, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Was the big carnivous dinosaur in the movie a Carnotaur or a T-rex? It is hard to tell since they both kind of look alike and have the horns on their heads. Several sites say that it is a T-rex while some others say it is a Carnotaur. Somebody should find the true identity of the giant beast. Johnny542 18:42, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Carnotaur or T-rex
Talk:Sabretooth (film)

message: When I read the phrase
:It should be noted that there are two former romances between some of the characters, as Trent and Casey had a romance once and broke up, as did Thatcher and Catherine.
my first reaction was "why?". Why should this be noted? – Adrian Lozano (talk) 01:08, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romances?
Talk:Silent Warnings

message: nothing like Signs, then?
WikiReaderer 02:27, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  So,
Talk:Species III

message: Huggle somehow didn't display my explaination in the Summary, so I'm providing one here. Edits by Ca$hman55 are vandalising, and by Ross5120 are GF. One of Ross5120's edits made a syntax error, the other one is acceptable as it works both ways.  Abhinav—Ŧ—� 05:02, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for Rolling back
Talk:Lunigiana

message: The tone of this article is thoroughly un-encyclopædic. Quite refreshing! Ian Spackman 13:07, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Needs a rewrite. It's a marvelous piece of nationalist chest-puffing that conveniently occults half the region's history without ever talking about the people of the Lunigiana, where the stone quarriers had no more love for the Savoys than for the Habsburgs. 74.56.208.54 (talk) 17:39, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

message: Photo caption says "View of Lunigiana between Filattiera and Aulla" -- which would be to the south of Filattiera.
However, the photo's Wikimedia Commons page identifies it as "Pontremoli vista dalla SS.62 della Cisa" (Pontremoli seen from highway SS.62 from the Cissa [Pass]) -- which would be well to the north of Filattiera. 
It clearly can't be both!
--Gambaguru (talk) 04:04, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo location?
Talk:Daddy-O (film)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – Hilst [talk] 12:43, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 March 2024
Talk:The American Astronaut

message: The Wikipedia article for the upcoming Cory McAbee's film Stingray Sam is nominated for deletion. For all those interested, please contribute to the discussion.--DrWho42 (talk) 03:16, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stingray Sam|Articles for deletion/Stingray Sam]] 

message: This section does not read like an encyclopedia.  It reads like a newspaper article or something.  I tagged it for cleanup. 75.119.126.134 (talk) 21:52, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Production" section 
Talk:The Twonky

message: "When the Twonky attempts to stop the woman’s reckless driving, it precipitates a crash that destroys the set for good."
Not so. In the hospital, Kerry is told the set was "smashed to smithereens". But the coach and TV technician arrive with the Twonky, claiming they've put it back together. (Actually, if the Twonky can change its form, it should be able to reconstitute itself after being damaged.) The film ends limply with Kerry yelling that they should get rid of it. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 13:17, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: destroyed for good?
Talk:One Shining Moment

message: Although the edit was not appropriate for an encyclopedia article, it was funny.  I couldn't agree more. - Desmond Hobson (talk) 17:02, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: About edit 354300959

message: On the "Notable Artists" section, it states, in relevant part, "[t]he format of the Hudson video deviated from prior years by cutting away from the tournament highlight montage on several occasions to show footage of Hudson singing with a recording studio backdrop, drawing criticism from some fans and viewers."
CBS had actually used a similar format in the first year of the Vandross rendition, which was after the 2003 tournament.  Vandross does appear in that montage, performing the song.  This should at least be mentioned in this section.  
Blitzburgh64 (talk) 14:43, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Notable Artists" section - review needed
Talk:Piloti

message: * Piloti - Needs a lot of work. It is not at all clear exactly what piloti are from this article. Kwertii 08:56, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There's more info now, it should be pretty clear - needs a picture though. Julia Rossi 06:36, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: removed tagJulia Rossi 01:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded 

message: I thought that the term discussed here came to English from French, where, even in the singular, it's pilotis. And I'd been under the vague impression that in English, too, it was two pilotis, one pilotis. However, I'm not familiar with architectural literature. (I note that the web sources cited keep to the plural, as does the article.) Informed comments? -- Hoary 09:40, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The origin is "pilot" which is French for "pile" Trewin Copplestone in "World Architecture" page 344 explains "Pilotis are posts or stilts supporting a whole building leaving the ground floor open" I suppose it is not really possible (at least at the time they were invented) to have just one in the singular. Giano 13:32, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Eh? I thought the origin was pilotis which is indeed French for "pile". But on noticing that lichen had grown in a rude outline around one of her pilotis, I think that Mme de Bourgh could say Ce pilotis-ci est dégeulace (singular). In English, would it be "this pilotis" or "this piloti"? -- Hoary 05:14, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems Pilot and pilotis are both French for pile - a pile that is supporting stake driven into the ground( not an a pile of rubbish kind of pile) so I'm unsure why the plural is not pilots. Whatever it does appear the page need to be renamed. Giano 07:28, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A wild guess here, but the pen-name of the columnist in Private Eye is "piloti" which is just one, himself. Maybe that's a clue. Julia Rossi 08:16, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but it could instead be an Eye witticism. -- Hoary 09:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha, eye c, well shpotted, shanks a lot. Julia Rossi 10:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two pilotis, one piloti? 
Category talk:American rappers

message: Why can't I find Lil' Kim listed here? The article on her is at
Lil' Kim.  That article includes the category American Rappers.  So, she should be listed here. r3 13:15, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because someone listed her by her real name: Jones, Kimberly.  I fixed it.--Urthogie 13:38, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Family Guy American rapper Peter Griffin 1972-2007 98.166.4.250 (talk) 05:20, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family Guy character American rapper Peter Griffin
Talk:The Undead (film)

message: Great entry, responsible party/parties. Perhaps add additional details regarding this films cult classic status? I could save for the laziness factor lol. But it could happen. 2603:3024:17CD:B000:392E:EACF:815A:1D01 (talk) 03:40, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of Corman's Best Films
Talk:The Eye Creatures

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 06:23, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: It is noteworthy that the VHS cover for The Eye Creatures (1965) re-uses artwork from the movie poster of The Crawling Eye (1958) Naaman Brown (talk) 04:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dont confuse "Eye Creatures" with "Crawling Eye" 

message: I don't think that the film is set in an "unnamed American countryside". It is set in American - i.e. USA - countryside in an unnamed state.101.98.175.68 (talk) 07:42, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnamed country?
Talk:The Starfighters

message: I'm a huge MST fan (see user name), so it's not that I don't get it; but my first concern is the notability of this film. It is completely unknown outside of the MST universe and has never attracted any notable media attention. Is the fact that it was on MST3K sufficient to declare it notable? (That'd be fine by me.)
Secondly, I'm removing the entire 'Analysis' section as OR; a link to (or at least citations from) a review would be more welcome. Rowsdower45 16:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability/OR? 

message: I think this plotless movie requires the reason.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:4000:62E0:415C:E582:A79E:5F19 (talk) 20:16, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added analysis
Talk:The Brooke Ellison Story

message: Brooke ellsion was a great roll model  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.109.57.198 (talk) 19:02, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

message: and should be consolidated to it. President of Chicago (talk) 03:25, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This stub duplicates the Brook Ellison article
Talk:The Work and the Glory

message: These were the filming locations for these three movies:
Johnson City, Tennessee, USA 
Kingsport, Tennessee, USA 
Knoxville, Tennessee, USA 
Madisonville, Tennessee, USA. The opening scene of the first movie was filmed in Vermont USA.  69.246.133.105 (talk) 23:33, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Filming locations
Talk:Kip Pardue

message: Hi, sadly I do not know how to fix the footnote and the following text was removed. Could anybody please integrate it? 
In October 2018 actress Sarah Scott claimed that she was lying under the covers as they were about to film a post-coital scene for the pilot of Mogulettes, wearing only boy shorts and nipple covers when, Pardue became aroused. According to her statements, he took her hand and placed it on his groin. “I literally froze,” Scott recalled. “I said, ‘What are you doing?’” “This isn’t a #MeToo thing,” she alleges he responded. “I’m not your employer. It’s not like I can fire you.” Scott shot the scene. When filming was done Pardue called her into his dressing room, where he proceeded to masturbate in front of her. [A year after Weinstein, sexual harassment still happens in Hollywood — and there's no clear way to report it](http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-sarah-scott-kip-pardue-20181028-story.html) , October 28th, 2018
The Sarah Scott wikilink is connected to the wrong article.
213.152.161.211 (talk) 17:38, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accusation of sexual misconduct - Please edit the footnotes
Talk:Brave New World (1998 film)

message: I just read through this article and it's not very good at all.  Aside from the first template which already noted that the article does not stand on its own two feet, the text seems a bit haphazardly written and even "contradicts" itself as if there were two voices writing the article.  I have not seen the movie myself so I cannot provide any relevant information.  More needs to be added from someone who is more knowledgable. --Stux 20:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  article quality 

message: I am curious who is copyright holder.
I suppose it is distributor?
I also think, that would be good idea, if wiki Movie pages included such info  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.187.206.6 (talk) 17:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question of copyright holder
Talk:Francis Douglas Memorial College

message: According to this page  the school years for FDMC are 9-15. Is this a mistake, or am I missing the way these numbers are decided? Because, obviously, FDMC doesn't go all the way up to Year 15, instead (like all secondary schools) it only goes up to Year 13. For now, I've put it in the article that the years are 7-13, because that's what is noted on the FDMC website . --Mitch119 13:35, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Allen Jones (whistleblower)

message: "evidence major drug companies sought to influence government officials."  Not news.  The author may have meant to suggest improper or corrupt influence, in whch case he really should say so, if such citeable allegations exist.
And what was the result of that wrongful termination suit?  2 years should be enough for the case to be resolved.   Midgley 13:36, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Overhead wires

message: * Overhead line, Overhead catenary, and Overhead cable are very similar (but not the same).  These three articles should be reshuffled/reorganized/merged ito some sensible configuration. --Smack (talk) 17:29, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

message: Its a little confusing to have three seperate articles about similar subjects. Why not have one article with three seperate sections? Piercetp 06:45, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agreed
Talk:Chlorambucil

message: Our dog is on this now, but the article seems to be only referring to human use.  If anyone could flush out some more information on what species it is used on, what different effects or symptoms it may have, etc, that would be appreciated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.149.86.36 (talk) 12:23, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Other species

message: The scheme depicting reaction with glutathione is missing the nitrogen in the drug  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.243.219.231 (talk) 18:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure
Talk:Albert Wilson (botanist)

message: There is something about this passage:-
"The club, which encompasses Santa Clara and San Mateo counties, raises money to preserve the natural environment while enriching the lives of community members through the sale of members' homegrown garden wonders. Each April, the club hosts an annual garden sale. "It takes two days to make the money and six months to argue about who to give it to," once said Colonel Robert E. Work (ret. USAF), a club vice president, adding, "We contribute to the good eating and beautification of the community.""
particularly the reported direct speech, that makes me think it comes from a record of an interview.  Whch makes me wonder about the copyright of that interview, and whether it should at least be in the references cited to establish sources.  WOuld an interview by a WP conributor count as citing the reference as the name of the person, or is it WP:OR?  I'd guess that it is not WP:VERIFYable unless the reporter's notebook makes it to somewhere else accessible.  Midgley 00:08, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On looking further a chunk is simply copied from http://www.svcn.com/archives/saratoganews/07.17.96/sn.cover.html which is given as a reference but not cited there.  I'm not enough of an authority on copyright and WP:CP to know if this is acceptable.  Ombusdsman's response to my question was not helpful. Midgley 09:47, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't find more than a few phrases copied from there, which is not a copyright problem. The article is in an inappropriate tone, however, and I have tagged it as such. —Centrx→talk • 00:14, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text is oroginal?  Or paraphrasing what reference? 
Talk:Tony Ray-Jones

message: Ehrlich says that TRJ was born on 7 June, and adds that he died when only 30. Where does the date 26 February come from? -- Hoary 13:52, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hoary, I don't remember where I got this from. Probably from the same source I used for the other info I added at the occasion. If you have reliable sources for the birth date go ahead and change it. RodC 22:16, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date
Talk:Patriot Act, Title III, Subtitle A

message: For a featured article this page has an extreme lack of discussion.. i.e. none, if there is an archive, someone please link it?
:There is none. JHMM13(Disc) 21:00, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How did an article become an FA without any dicussion? just curious 70.177.12.108 21:33, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the FAC process does not take that into account when it decides to promote an article. I wrote a featured article that had little to no meaningful discussion but was at featured quality because I chose to bring it there. It is possible that this article is not worthy of being a featured article, however, and if you feel that way, I suggest signing up a user account and bring the issue up with the fine folks over at featured article review. I personally agree with you that this article seems a bit weak in the analysis area and appears to simply be a summary. However, you might do well to consult the debate that took place in this article's FAC for any issues brought up then. It should be noted that FA standards were significantly lower in April of 2006, so you might be very well justified in proposing the delisting of this article. JHMM13(Disc) 03:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: talk..

message: *A merger proposal was put up way back in 2009, I currently oppose a merger as it seems this article has enough content and is a former featured article. If there is no opposition I will remove the tags, please provide your opinions. Gsingh (talk) 19:27, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal
Talk:Teatro di San Carlo

message: What is intended by the preposition in ‘With the end of the nineteenth century’? Towards? At? Shortly After? Around? --Ian Spackman 14:01, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Some nice tidying up; well done.
Vivaverdi 00:56, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Opera News just published this article on the theatre if anyone cares to use it as a ref to update the article. Best,4meter4 (talk) 14:00, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opera News 

message: "...the Campania regional government funded a €67 renovation..."
Surely there must be something missing from that sentence. --23.119.205.88 (talk) 08:03, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  A whole 67 euros?
Talk:Eagle Farm, Queensland

message: There's not enough stuff about the Allison engine testing stands to make a page so I added it here. Robertwhyteus (talk) 07:58, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allison Engine Testing Stands 

message: The reference found (was missing) has lots more info about this area and could be mined.Robertwhyteus (talk) 09:28, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aboriginal Camps 