lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Khoikhoi 2

message: Username	Khoikhoi
Total edits	40132
Distinct pages edited	15688
Average edits/page	2.558
First edit	01:24, 9 December 2005
	
(main)	22689
Talk	3203
User	1155
User talk	8764
Image	113
Image talk	4
Template	417
Template talk	65
Category	80
Category talk	1
Wikipedia	3544
Wikipedia talk	53
Portal	41
Portal talk	3
Khoikhoi's editcount summary stats as of 00:11, October 14 2006, using Interiot's tool. (aeropagitica) 00:11, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

message: I have moved this page to its proper title. This is consistent with other 2nd and subsequent RfA nominations. --Siva1979Talk to me 01:49, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page moved 

message: As we all know, the previous nomination was ruined by malignant trolls. I'm quite surprized that Bcrats didn't learn their lessons and allow this case to be plagued by the same evil. Is it a new fashion to steep RfAs in incivility? Sigh... --Ghirla -трёп- 18:47, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trolling 

message: Please note that User:Mustafa Akalp has been campaigning against this candidate, spamming his "strong oppose" opinion on the talk pages of multiple users (see ). Gwernol 12:16, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He has also spammed in the Turkish WP. Contribs. •NikoSilver• 15:59, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Candidate's personal info is also being spammed to various articles he has worked on along with a request to come here and oppose, most likely by the open proxy vandal know as Bonaparte. --InShaneee 20:27, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I've brought the matter to the attention of the bureaucrat on the Turkish Wikipedia. Errabee 00:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from the main page 

message: I have added relative notes with diffs below each user that I could find as being positively contacted by RfA vote spamming prior to their vote. A few were also contacted by articles they watch, such as Allah. I would like to know how serious template  is, when it says: "Such contributors are not prohibited from commenting, but it's important for the closing administrator or bureaucrat to know how representative the participants are of Wikipedians generally". •NikoSilver• 16:52, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Votes by RfA vote spamming
Talk:Mechanical efficiency

message: I would like to make some revisions to this article to make it more precise and link it to other articles on machines and efficiency. Prof McCarthy (talk) 23:57, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to edit this article in a way that kept the spirit of the original material and corrected some errors, but it rapidly became redundant and awkward.  Even this version is a flawed though correct.  Please feel free to restore any wording from the previous version, if you feel it is helpful. Prof McCarthy (talk) 07:17, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisions to this article 

message: Might I correct you … maybe not.
But a home heater (for example) would turn electricity to heat at a 1:1 ratio
Am I wrong?? 
(Given there is no power switch) 50.47.165.243 (talk) 22:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about a heater?
Talk:Thomas Blake Glover

message: Glover is traditionally known as the first non-Japanese to be awarded the Order of the Rising Sun  However, that singular honor actually belongs to U.S. Army Col. J.R. Wasson who, according to the New York Times, was given "the decoration of the Rising Sun, of the Imperial Order of Meiji, a distinction no other foreigner ever enjoyed."  The Times reported that U.S. President Grant sent the colonel to Japan as a military instructor; and he commanded Japanese troops during an 1874 punitive expedition against Formosa. Subsequently, the colonel was recognized by Emperor Meiji as a consequence of his conduct during this minor military campaign.<.ref>"A Victory for the Chinese; Japanese Driven with Heavy Loss from Ping-yang", New York Times, August 22, 1894.<./ref> --Ooperhoofd (talk) 21:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Order of the Rising Sun

message: A short article, notable mostly for Glover's living there, but is now a museum to him. Unless it can be expanded beyond a stub to stand alone, it should be merged here. Rodhullandemu 01:48, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge of [[Glover House, Aberdeen]] 
Talk:Mohan Babu

message: What are you talking about ? --Milki 21:55, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: - PK talk 09:57, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mohan Babu filmography 
Talk:Waylander the Slayer

message: This article was created for others to contribute to - if you know absolutely ANYTHING about Waylander the Slayer, please add it to the article for others' benefit.
Although it's nice to see someone having gone through this amount of effort I'm not entirely convinced this is what should be on this particular page. 
maybe shorten it down into a synposis rather than covering all of the books completely including plot twists without spoiler warnings? 
also should we not perhaps try to put together more information about Waylander the man rather than the books?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 13.21.125.8 (talk) 13:17, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding to this Article
Talk:List of expansion operations and planning of the Axis powers

message: Wasn't there once listed here proposed invasions by the Axis Powers of the United States and Canada, or am I mistaken?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk • contribs) 21:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axis plans for invasion of the United States during WWII --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 22:18, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: O well it makes sense based on that discussion, but is there any chance I can see the old article at all? Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 20:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  North America 

message: I think this article has swayed a bit from its intended function. What is it supposed to cover exactly? Military engagements and operations by World War II countries, including the Axis powers, are presumably already covered in other articles such as here and here, to name but a few. Only expansion operations that weren't actually carried out, such as the proposed Japanese invasion of Australia, or anything that could be considered an expansion operation (which actually means most of them when you get down to it)? And what time-frame should we be concerned about? Just 1937-1943, after which point the Axis powers can confidently be said to have effectively "lost the war"? Or the entire period of their military history in World War II? Only "expansion" operations, or also contingency operations?
Is it also supposed to cover purely military operations (in which case those intended administrative districts for various conquered territories such as Nazi Germany's Reichskommissariats or the Japanese Empire's Co-Prosperity Sphere don't belong here), or just "global expansion of the Axis Powers"? 
--Morgan Hauser (talk) 03:45, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Focus of this article
Talk:Free body

message: The page contained this:
A free body possesses two fundamental properties that make the concept useful in analyzing static and dynamic equilibrium:
* The internal forces of the free body are, by definition, assumed to completely off-set one another so that the body as a whole is in static equilibrium.
* As a consequence, the body can be treated as a single entity with its total mass located entirely at the center of mass and subject to Newton's second law
I have removed these sentences because
1) A free body need not be in equilibrium
2) Forces need not act through the centre of mass - torques are quite okay
139.80.48.19 22:28, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections 

message: I'm rating this article up to Start-class quality. Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 19:54, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-rating quality class
Talk:Pioneer Courthouse

message: What is the current construction on the courthouse? A quick googling didn't show anything, but the entire west face is covered in scaffolding. Tedder (talk) 05:40, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current construction? 

message: In describing the first preservation effort, the word "was" needs to be added in between "timing" and "bad."
So it would look like: (without Caps of course)
Martin immediately replied that the timing WAS bad since Oregon was asking for funding of the Bonneville Dam, and it was likely illegal to donate a post office to a city.
Aphillips15 (talk) 23:59, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: tedder (talk) 00:00, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Aphillips15, 7 April 2010 

message: The article states that Doyle opposed the plan to demolish the building in 1933, but Doyle died in 1928.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.189.91.63 (talk) 16:11, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A. E. Doyle 

message: delete  | location = 555 S.W. Yamhill Street, Portland, Oregon
add correct address = 700 S.W. Sixth Avenue, Portland, Oregon
During the 2003-2005 renovation, the main entrance to the building became the west side facing Pioneer Courthouse Square.  The address was changed in 2005 to reflect this orientation.  (Please note that the address on GSA's website for the Pioneer Courthouse has not been updated to reflect this fact.
I am Robert M. Walch, Senior Deputy Clerk for the U.S. Court of Appeals and was the Court's project manager for the 2003-2005 project.  My office is located in the Pioneer Courthouse and I am the source of this information.)  
Robmike (talk) 20:18, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: —EncMstr (talk) 22:01, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Robmike, 29 November 2010 
Talk:Translation (physics)

message: Translational symmetry operations (and Noether's theorem) are not really on topic in this article, which is strictly a definition of the term translation and is not related to symmetry. It also is not related to coordinate transformations, which are better handled in Translation (geometry). Brews ohare (talk) 19:04, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translational symmetry 

message: Would it be very controversial to add that - in physics - translations follow a straight line ?
Sjoerd22 (talk) 22:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Along "a straight line" would be a problem because paths of motion can be curved and the motion still be considered translation.  For example, in planetary motions around the sun, the paths of motion are circular, but at any point along the orbit the planet's motion tangential to the orbit is translational in nature.  Of course, this is in addition to any rotation about its axis the planet may have.  An object or body can undergo both translation and rotation at the same time, in addition to any motion resulting from its deformation or distortion of shape, such as vibration.  H Padleckas (talk) 19:30, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keeping it simple is no sin 

message: I have copied this article into a section under translation (geometry) and it seems to fit in well.  It seems reasonable to set this article to redirect to translation (geometry). Prof McCarthy (talk) 18:29, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I am in support of this...Roshan220195 (talk) 18:23, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Page converted to redirect since merger has been done Roshan220195 (talk) 20:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to translation (geometry)
Talk:Wright Flying School

message: Here's what Crouch says (page 426): The flying would be done at Simms Station, the old Huffman Prairie. They would...prepare the field...when the weather eased in the spring. In the meantime, Orville began operations at a winter flying field in Montgomery, Alabama. DonFB 21:16, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chronology
Portal talk:Belgium/Selected article/2006

message: *Featured articles: Belgium (permanently on top), The Adventures of Tintin (October 2006), Congo Free State, Franks, History of the Netherlands, Father Damien, Poison gas in World War I
*Good articles: Diamond cut, Charlemagne, Julius Caesar, Albrecht Rodenbach, Marvin Gaye
*Other: Menin Gate (November 2006), Belgian beer (December 2006)
Please add your favourites to this list only (don't remove any unless nonsense additions please), and discuss pro's and con's below, per month. Fram 21:22, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible candidates

message: * Menin Gate: it is a decent article, nothing more, and it is of course November-related. There are better articles about Belgian subjects, but we shuld use these sparingly if we don't want to run out of articles in a few months... Fram 11:39, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Candidate for November 2006

message: * Belgian beer: what could be more Belgian than beer? And it's december,we have to celebrate a little...Fram 14:32, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Candidate for December 2006
Talk:Runaway hit

message: The term "runaway hit" is used to refer to films as well as singles, and there could be other situations where it has been used. The article needs expanding to reflect this. Extraordinary Machine 21:23, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And sometimes to refer to computer games, as I saw here Transport Tycoon. JanCK 03:18, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs expanding
Talk:Al Día (Dallas)

message: While:
*http://m.aldiadallas.com/aldia/index.htm
*http://m.aldiadallas.com/aldia/
*http://m.aldiadallas.com/
... exists, no content is displayed yet
WhisperToMe (talk) 00:00, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Mobile
Talk:Skelliconnection

message: Mini TV's was covered by Edmonton rapper Cadence Weapon on his Separation Anxiety (2008) mixtape. Maybe this should be mentionned (maybe not). I think it should, I don't know where to put it. -M.Nelson (talk) 21:21, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mini TV's/Cade Weap
Talk:Ōkuma Shigenobu

message: ==Yoshinobu?==
I find it hard to believe that Ōkuma went to meet with "Shogun Yoshinobu" in Edo; Yoshinobu never once set foot in Edo during his time as shogun. (see Tokugawa Munefusa (2005). Tokugawa yonbyakunen no naisho-banashi: raibaru bushō-hen (Tokyo: Bungei-shunju), p. 161). As such, I believe this implies that Ōkuma went to Edo and presented his proposal to the shogunate, and the shogunate (and not necessarily the shogun) ordered his arrest. Can anyone further investigate this? -Tadakuni 05:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, it seems strange that one might "declare" Ōkuma a ronin, since a rōnin is simply a masterless samurai and does not inherently imply a criminal status, and Okuma was a Saga-han retainer... -Tadakuni 05:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I've solved the discrepancy-- note the following excerpt from Ōkuma's article on the Japanese Wikipedia: 慶応3年（1867年）、副島と共に将軍 徳川慶喜に大政奉還を勧めることを計画し、脱藩して京都へ赴いたが、捕縛の上、佐賀に送還され、1か月の謹慎処分を受けた。 Translation: "In Keiō 3 (1867), together with Soejima, he planned to recommend resignation to the shogun Tokugawa Yoshinobu; [they] left the domain without permission (dappan shite) and went to Kyoto, but they were arrested and sent back to Saga, where they were placed in kinshin (confinement) for one month." Can anyone contribute a print source to back this up? -Tadakuni 05:38, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, I found an appropriate citation. -Tadakuni 05:53, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I find it hard to believe that Ōkuma went to meet with "Shogun Yoshinobu" in Edo; Yoshinobu never once set foot in Edo during his time as shogun. (see Tokugawa Munefusa (2005). Tokugawa yonbyakunen no naisho-banashi: raibaru bushō-hen (Tokyo: Bungei-shunju), p. 161). As such, I believe this implies that Ōkuma went to Edo and presented his proposal to the shogunate, and the shogunate (and not necessarily the shogun) ordered his arrest. Can anyone further investigate this? -Tadakuni 05:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, it seems strange that one might "declare" Ōkuma a ronin, since a rōnin is simply a masterless samurai and does not inherently imply a criminal status, and Okuma was a Saga-han retainer... -Tadakuni 05:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I've solved the discrepancy-- note the following excerpt from Ōkuma's article on the Japanese Wikipedia: 慶応3年（1867年）、副島と共に将軍 徳川慶喜に大政奉還を勧めることを計画し、脱藩して京都へ赴いたが、捕縛の上、佐賀に送還され、1か月の謹慎処分を受けた。 Translation: "In Keiō 3 (1867), together with Soejima, he planned to recommend resignation to the shogun Tokugawa Yoshinobu; [they] left the domain without permission (dappan shite) and went to Kyoto, but they were arrested and sent back to Saga, where they were placed in kinshin (confinement) for one month." Can anyone contribute a print source to back this up? -Tadakuni 05:38, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, I found an appropriate citation. -Tadakuni 05:53, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Yoshinobu?
Talk:Resistance distance

message: The notion of resistance distance also exists for electric networks, where it is something completely different:  The current flowing between two nodes of an electric network of resistances when applying a unit voltage.–Jérôme 11:48, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is the resistance between those two nodes, i.e. exactly the thing this article is about. 88.130.33.114 (talk) 10:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Usage in Electric Networks

message: The notion of resistance distance seems like it may be related to eigenvector centrality. I'm thinking that a vertex with high eigenvector centrality may be the vertex with lowest resistance distance to all the other vertices in the graph. Is that right? —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 07:01, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eigenvector centrality
Talk:Orbital decay

message: For many orbits, e.g. selenocentric orbits, atmospheric interaction cannot be the primary cause of orbital decay. Instead, isn't it brought about by the gravitational attraction of other nearby masses -- primarily the Earth in the case of selenocentric orbits? (sdsds - talk) 08:09, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why do you think so? The Moon has a much thinner atmosphere, but some atmospheric drag still exists, and I'd expect it to dominate gravitational interaction from the Earth on selenocentric orbits close enough to the Moon. So these should be either stable on human timescales (no orbital decay at all) or decay slowly due to the weak atmospheric drag. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 19:08, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you're quite mistaken; the drag from Earth's (and Moon's) atmosphere is negligible near the Moon, yet most orbits aren't stable at all; see Lunar orbit. The cause is mass concentration (astronomy); see below. JustinTime55 (talk) 19:54, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decay resulting from third-body interactions 

message: While orbital decay from gravitational radiation is in theory possible, I know of no data to suggest it happens with man made satellites. Probably because for things the size of satellites (say, the ISS) gravitational radiation would work on the scale of billions of years. Can we please remove this section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.165.95.66 (talk) 03:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I quite agree; it doesn't really have anything to do with real-world orbital decay. Also, it is uncited, so I am moving it here:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Whenever two masses orbit each other, the combined effect of the spacetime curvature of the moving objects produces gravitational waves which carry away orbital energy.  For small masses this effect is negligible, but for very massive objects like black holes and neutron stars the energy carried away can be rapid enough to cause their orbits to spiral in on each other, eventually merging the two masses.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think this is what comes of a little too much physics, and not enough engineering. JustinTime55 (talk) 21:36, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Gravitational radiation
Talk:Kenneth Pendar

message: This article was the subject of an AfD discussion closed on 13 October 2006.  The result was no consensus/default keep. Xoloz 21:30, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD Result Notice
Talk:Predicate logic (Philosophy)

message: This article is totoally about proposition logic, but the title is predicate logic!
It should be changed, although I don't know what title would be proper because I'm not familiar with logic in philosophy. Took 21:30, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh, I went to the talk page here to see if anyone pointed this out. You're completely right. I'm replacing the entire article with a stub piece. Simões (talk/contribs) 05:39, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Actually, I just redirected it to first-order logic. Simões (talk/contribs) 05:44, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad title
Talk:Area density

message: Another IP editor added that BMI is in terms of area density. Really? BMI only takes into account one dimension, height, and does not account for different body shapes. Two people of the same height and weight, but with different widths (ie the thin one being very dense and muscular, the wider one being less dense) have different cross sections, different area densities, but the same BMI.--64.160.119.77 (talk) 17:21, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: BMI is expressed in units of areal density, even though, of course, the area is nominal. --Macrakis (talk) 15:19, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  BMI & area density?
Talk:Dynamical simulation

message: I don't think this topic actually exists in reality..  In neither science nor computing is the term "dynamical simulation" a common phrase.
:There are various scientific articles that use this phrase, but this Wikipedia article is mostly concerned with rigid-body dynamics. Jarble (talk) 03:04, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: In this article, "dynamical simulation" seems to describe simulations that involve dynamics. Jarble (talk) 20:59, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I am inclined to agree... does this article really need to be separated from Dynamic simulation?  ReignInSupremeDarkness (talk) 01:36, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

message: — Assignment last updated by Lzepeda12 (talk) 21:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: 4A Wikipedia assignment