Talk:Ucluelet

message: either it's to be a separate article, or deleted entirely; it's a study document, a public report; maybe something like a community-oriented Wiki, a variant on WikiSource, for public debates and assemblage of youtube etc links as a collective effort/forum, and taht would bbe a good thing; but this is for a radio license, not an environmental or geohazard study.  I'm vvery uncertain it belongs in regular wikipedia at all; and, as said, on teh other hand Wiki technology and the appropriate environment for "community wiki" (Wikimunity?) for debate/resources on public issues, that's a good thing; I'm just not sure this is encyclopedic.Skookum1 (talk) 05:26, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Broadcasting section dubious

message: I've noticed this elsewhere, though not often; at most town/city articles there's some mention of the [[Ucluelet First Nation|local First Nation.  Especially, um, when the town is named for them; I was surprised not to see anything here; and in the Demographics section just something promoting retirement property, so it's pretty clear that the page has been massaged a bit; more on actual history and less current travelogue/stats, and pics, and some community (as opposed to corporate) flavour would go a long way to humanizing it; but that's true of a lot of town articles, not just in BC (but often in BC).  Anyway, I've interlinked Ucluelet, British Columbia and Ucluelet First Nation for the first time....quelle étrange... but this is BC, isn't it?  
Anyway other editors pls watch out for such "digital segregation"; it's subtle, but it is intentional; talk about two solitudes, we've got fifty....the demoraphics section here could have something on the ethnic composition of the non-native community, the former cannery populations and so on, decline with decline of the fishery and loggging alike and so on; I don't know much about Ucluelet, just wanting this article to sound and look like something more than a village/town brochure.Skookum1 (talk) 05:37, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Segregation ended" - Ucluelet FN/Ucluelet BC

message: Hi Bearcat; added back in WEst Coast of VI cat as it's in a different hierarchy; yes, this RD is within that region but RD cats aren't the same thing as geographic-region cats and IMO should only be used for member-units of RDs, i.e. munis, electoral areas, agencies, cities/towns etc.  This is a town/village article, so the RD category applies; it would not apply to the First Nations in the area (which are not members of the RD and while RD officials/maps might say otherwise, the Nuu-chah-nulth haven't signed anything saying so...nor do they get a seat on the RD board...); also geographic features like Barkley Sound belong in the geographic cat-hierarchy, not in a governance cat-hierarchy, which is what the RDs are.  RDs are not the equivalent of counties in the US and Ontario, and don't go back fartehr than the 1960s or '70s.....Skookum1 (talk) 22:23, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Geography vs RD cats

message: I added this because of the presence of User:Tourism Ucluelet, who are the tourism office for Ucluelet, as they announced on their first edit.  Please read WP:COI and WP:MOS and please avoid "peacock" terms (see WP:Peacock) and remember this page is not meant to be advertising in any way (see WP:Spam), but should have an encyclopedic tone.  I removed :Image:ukee.jpg because it had been re-placed at an awkward position in the lede and should not be there; I had placed it in a more suitable location lower down the page; at the top it constitutes clutter.Skookum1 (talk) 15:29, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: COI template

message: Ucluelet is on the east coast of Vancouver Island, not the west as written in the description. 162.212.236.69 (talk) 13:35, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  the island location description