lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Socialism in Canada

message: OK, Need help. I wrote like eight paragraphs and only one is showing.  Why is that? The others are still present in the editing page, they just won't show up in the article. That is very frustrating, somebody please help. Canadianpunk77 (talk) 22:35, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Many of the newer edits have removed the bottom sections, or have code isn't "closed" that is screwing things up.  Please take more care with your edits. Kevlar67 (talk) 19:05, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visual Problems 

message: There are a number of problems with this article including lack of sources and the vague title.  I have begun work on writing the history section in greater detail based on sources at User:The Four Deuces/Canadian Left.  I suggest renaming the article because its current title is vague.  Also, since the NDP is one party, thre is no need to list the provincial affiliates.  TFD (talk) 17:11, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems with article

message: It seems problematic to me to qualify the NDP as a socialist party, especialy in the present times (after all, Justin Trudeau beacame prime minister has the LPC shifted the NDP on its left...). The same goes for the CCF, which had a strong liberal strend from the beginning. Social-democracy isn't synonymous with democratic socialism, and the NDP and the CCF qualify in my opinion as liberal parties, and not socialist ones. If this point of view is adopted, one can then ask how was socialism "a major political force in Canada", " along with conservatism and liberalism"...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.102.99.233 (talk) 14:21, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  NDP and the nature of socialism
Talk:Pink-tongued skink

message: 'They are called commonly pink-tongued lizards in Australia, where true lizards (Lacertidae) do not naturally occur'
1: Bearded Dragons, Thorny Devils, several monitors are in Australia. Don't they count?
2: By Lacertidae, I assume it meant Lacertilia. Lacertidae is a family containing the lacertas.
=| --TangoFett (talk) 07:24, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Oligosoma

message: Hello! Looks like this talk page is quiet for now but I will add some taxonomical notes. I am issuing a redirect in the old Cyclodina page to redirect to Oligosoma because it will get too redundant having pages for obsolete taxon. Maybe just add a note?--EllisD (talk) 00:52, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The revised edition of Jewell (2011) is the best reference to be using for the New Zealand skinks, and he lists several species (with photographs) that had yet to be scientifically described as of 2011. They're likely to be referred to for some years while we wait for formal descriptions, so it seems reasonable to at least put them on the list as red links while we wait. 
I've also deleted the links to Te Papa collection items, which are already present, under External Links, on the page of each species concerned. Having them as citations here does not serve the ordinary purpose of a citation, which would be to point to the first description for example. An editor with good intent has gone through and added these Te Papa links, but they're really not needed I think. Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 03:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added figured but yet-to-be-named species from Jewell
Talk:Prasinohaema

message: From https://blog.nationalgeographic.org/2013/09/30/why-do-mysterious-lizards-have-green-blood/: "No other vertebrate is known to have green blood." Is blog.nationalgeographic.org a reliable source? --YellowCakeUranium (talk) 18:40, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add
Talk:News bureau

message: If the Reuters "news bureau" on second life is a major part of this article, I can see why it's protected. Flowanda | Talk 06:57, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article isn't protected, nor is Reuters, nor is Second Life.  Are you suggesting it should be changed?  It's just a one-sentence mention, as is CNN's attempt to do the same thing, in the section about nontraditional bureaus.  I'm not sure what it proves.  Perhaps that they're scrambling, or trying to create buzz, or pander to something they don't understand?  Who knows?  It would be nice to have a more comprehensive account in the article of the rise, function, and decline of traditional news bureaus as the news business evolved.  One has this image of a guy in a trench coat and tie and no hat in the snow standing in front of Red Square with a microphone talking about what happened in the Kremlin that day.  That used to be considered the core of serious journalism.  Wikidemo 18:19, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  :Protection 
Talk:List of Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue cover models

message: I think that this article needs to be merged with Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue. There is a ton of overlap between this article and that article. The other article even has a list of models that could be modified to incorporate data from this article. Just no reason for 2 articles here. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 10:22, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose As a distinct list, this article would likely be a WP:FL, if we could find all the nationalities.  This is a good list and I think an interesting list as a separate article.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD)  02:58, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge tag 

message: See discussions on fashion model templates at Talk:Sports_Illustrated_Swimsuit_Issue#End_the_sexism_now_-_Swimsuit_Issue and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Fashion#End_the_sexism_now_-_Magazine_templates.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM)  20:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fashion model templates
Talk:Polacca

message: Our article Sail plan#types of ships shows a square-rigged foremast, the last two masts lateen-rigged, while this article says the main mast is square-rigged and the fore and mizzen masts are lateen-rigged.  Why is this? J S Ayer (talk) 05:02, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy 

message: The polacca is also spelled in older English, "poleacre" or even "pole-acre". There are articles where this spelling is used. A referral would be helpful. Ptilinopus (talk) 23:20, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:High and tight

message: High and tight refers to the type of flattop with the sides shaved close worn by a large percentage of the US military. Horseshoe flattop refers to the exact same haircut, but with the top slightly lower, so that the center of the head doesn't have enough hair on it to produce a uniformly colored apperarance. The difference between the two is usually less than a quarter inch. EvilCouch 07:31, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also proposing Recon (haircut) get merged here. It's also a variant of the high and tight. EvilCouch 07:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I concur.  Readers would be best served by reading about all three variations in one place, not having almost identical information fragmented across three pages.  Be bold!  Rossami (talk) 00:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I forgot about this merge proposal until you seconded it. I've since merged them into the article. EvilCouch (talk) 10:01, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: I'd always heard that Marines were called jarheads because their heads are as empty as a jar.
And a high and tight doesn't look like the top of a mason jar anyway. a flattop would be closer. Any citation?Canine virtuoso (talk) 21:40, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jarhead because of high and tight?

message: From the article, it appears that "high" refers to the short part and "tight" to the top part:
par. 2 (part): 'While many variations of the style exist, the one common feature is that all of the hair on the sides and back of the head is clipped very close, usually 1/16 inch (1.5 mm) or shorter, up to a point above the temples, referring to the "high" part of its name. A sharp line delineates the boundary between the close-cut sides and back and the longer top portion, referring to the "tight" part of its name.'
This is confusing.  Am I misreading, or are there misplaced modifiers?  Should what I quoted read like the following?
Proposed replacement for above quote: 'While many variations of the style exist, the one common feature is that all of the hair on the sides and back of the head is clipped very close (the "tight" part of the name), usually 1/16 inch (1.5 mm) or shorter, up to a point above the temples. A sharp line delineates the boundary between the close-cut sides and back and the longer top portion (the "high" part of the name).'
If you know that my proposed version is what is meant, please modify the article, and please let me know (<genew@telus.net>).
154.5.155.44 (talk) 10:56, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  high part / tight part
Talk:Vigilant (yacht)

message: This editor wonders if newly added text describing the races that took place during the 1893 America's Cup wouldn't be better placed in an article about the 1893 America's Cup.  This amount of detail isn't in keeping with the current state of most, if not all, other America's Cup challenger / defender yacht articles.
--Trappist the monk (talk) 00:20, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the plan, but I don't know how soon I'll get to it. Mojoworker (talk) 07:05, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriate content?
Talk:Ministry of Defence (Sri Lanka)

message: Somebody created the Www.defence.lk page... I was going to just deleted it because I knew there was probably a page for the Mini of Defence (sic) for Sri Lanka, but once I read it I realized it had some good info (if it can be verified). So, I proposed merging it here. It may seem trivial to propose this merging, but I just wanted to see if anybody out there cared. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 07:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah. It's has extreme WP:NPOV issues - it reads like an advertisement for the website. Nothing's referenced either, so I'm challenging (removing) it. --AbsolutDan (talk) 02:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 
Talk:AT&T Internet Services

message: Considering the data providers that do business under the AT&T Internet Services name, they are wikilinked to articles that might as well be merged into this article since they are so short.  ATTIS also provides legacy service under the Prodigy name, but Prodigy, as it right now, is not a company that does business as ATTIS.  It may also be worth mentioning SBC Advanced Solutions, Inc. (ASI) as they do all the physical work in getting the phone companies (e.g. Pacific Bell Telephone Company) connected with the data providers (Pacific Bell Internet Services).  Appropriate merge and expansion of the article is needed. --Geopgeop (T) 08:04, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Or something along those lines. See http://worldnet.att.net/features/faq040108.html. --Geopgeop (T) 19:27, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "AT&T Yahoo! (service name)" renaming to "AT&T (service name) powered by Yahoo!" 

message: I propose that AT&T Worldnet be merged into AT&T Internet Services. Both articles cover the same subject manner. In fact, AT&T Internet Services now owns the functionality that AT&T Worldnet once had. Ultimately, I propose that the information from AT&T Worldnet be merged into AT&T Internet Services as its own section to reflect its history. Steel1943 (talk) 01:36, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: See Talk:SNET_Diversified_Group --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:43, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge  Klbrain (talk) 22:37, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[SNET Diversified Group]] 

message: I think that this page should be renamed to correspond to it's current name. In the article, it is mentioned as Currently from AT&T, however the title does not match that. Jkrosado (talk) 02:01, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename article 

message: Some markets still are allowed DSL Connections especially in apartment complexes where cable companies have a monopoly over the market for internet connections 2601:642:4400:9F00:64C0:FEF4:8CC:196C (talk) 02:48, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  DSL Services
Talk:Tsetse (nuclear primary)

message: The only source given is the Chuck Hansen article, Beware the Old Story.   The relevant paragraph of this article is:
In fact, nearly 43 percent of the alleged problems could be blamed on five primaries. The MK 43, W44, W50, MK 57, and W59 shared a common primary, the “Tsetse”; the W/MK 28, W40, and W49 also used a common primary, the “Python.” Both of these primaries were plagued by a tritium cross-section miscalculation discovered during the early 1960s after the nuclear testing moratorium had ended. 
There is no other mention of a Tsetse primary in the article.   This paragraph is the entire source of the current Wikipedia article.   Hansen provided no references and no indication of his sources.  I also note this is an advocacy article.   The second paragraph of the article is:
If this occurs, both the public and Congress would be wise to examine previous arguments by the nuclear weapons establishment–which were invariably characterized by outright falsehoods, half truths, and wild exaggerations.
- Crosbie 17:18, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Beware the old story''
Talk:Lightning GT

message: According to the weblink an the german version of this article, the power ist 120 kW (163 hp) for each motor, which would be a total of 652 hp, not 700 hp. --Qaywsxedc 08:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 120 kW would be 644 hp. 199.125.109.129 (talk) 06:20, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  700 bhp? 
Talk:Chemical graph theory

message: IMHO, the context of this page should be moved to Mathematical chemistry, and this page should be deleted. "Chemical graph theory" was very good name for the book by Bonchev and Rouvray, but it is not chemical branch.--Tim32 09:10, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Uniparental disomy

message: In the third paragraph, it currently states: "However, if the UPD causing event happens during meiosis I, the genotype may include identical copies of the uniparental chromosome (isodisomy), leading to the manifestation of rare recessive disorders."  I'm pretty sure this is only likely to occur if the UPD causing event occurs in meiosis II, when the sister chromatids separate.  I will change it.  If I am wrong, comment here and then change it back.
Dwinetsk 09:12, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: In

message: Currently the lede says in its entirety:
:Uniparental disomy (UPD) occurs when a person receives two copies of a chromosome, or of part of a chromosome, from one parent and no copies from the other parent.[1]. UPD can be the result of isodisomy (meiosis II error) or heterodisomy (meiosis I error)[2] .
The first sentence is great for the lay reader, but the second is not. "Isodisomy" and "heterodisomy" need to be defined in laypersons' terms, but the parenthetical comments don't do the trick. Clarification, please.  Thanks. Duoduoduo (talk) 14:37, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarity of the lede to the layperson 

message: I vote for deleting this section. it is not clear what is meant by "all chromosomes", the reference link is broken and what is recoverable from the wayback machine is a figure illustrating the distinction between heterodisomy and isodisomy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.191.194.157 (talk) 15:49, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  All chromosomes? 

message: I've read some articals about UPD, most of which said both copies of a whole chromosome pair have originated from one parent is UPD, like  https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5837, https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/uniparental-disomy. But some didn't, like PMC8800777 said "Uniparental disomy (UPD) refers to a chromosome defect that an individual's homologous chromosome or segments are inherited from one parent." It seems that the citation used in this entry cannot proof UDP is "or of part of a chromosome". Which one is right? Heihaheihaha (talk) 14:22, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should segmental UDP be contain in the definition of UPD?
Talk:Anglican Diocese of Dunedin

message: A lot of information lacks references, and is of limited interest.  For example, the information that “Brother Keith” took vows lacks and reference, or even his full name.  This soubds like an anecdote, and out of place i. an encyclopedia.  A lot of the other information needs references. FairDinks (talk) 05:46, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  lack if references
Talk:Zune 30

message: uh why does the image say zune-color-negro?
Id call it brown personally
Negro is spanish for black.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.107.105.178 (talk) 20:59, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Much of the "Recent Firmware Issues" section makes no sense starting with "firmware".  That term (firmware) is rather vague to begin with but the section goes on to alternately blame the problem on upgradeable software ("stems from 3.1 update") and then hardware ("Microsoft left it to Toshiba").  Even worse, there's no reference for the Toshiba comment.  (The "[50]" after that sentence is not an active link - probably just left over from where someone copied it from.)  In any case, the statement that MS stated the issue is that "Zune 30s were not programmed to recognize ...") is misleading.  What it should say is something more like "It's a bug; the software does the wrong thing when handling the last day of a leap year." Donlibes (talk) 18:24, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Firmware issues 
Talk:The Diana Chronicles

message: This previous article was an unashamed glorification of a biography that has met with very mixed criticism, particulary as it is viewed by some parties as jumping on the Diana bandwagon. I have added in a rather less positive review from The Daily Telegraphy to counter all the other reviews which are all favourable. I would appreciate it if THIS IS NOT DELETEDIvankinsman 09:57, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Traditionalist School

message: So far, the rationale for this nomination is that the word "Traditionalism" is ambiguous, as many things can be so called. The proposed changes were:
* Renaming to the scope of the article: Integral Traditionalism, or in any case adding the word "Integral" in the beginning. However, this expression returns very few results on Google Scholar.
* Renaming to "Perennialism", which returns more results, although many of them are unrelated to the subject matter.
* Renaming to "Traditionalist school of philosophy", from the base category article. I searched on Google Scholar for this, and found that although "traditionalist school" returns a good number of results, most of them are unrelated.
* In any case, if the word "traditionalism" or "traditionalist" appear anywhere except as first word, it was suggested that it be changed to lowercase.
* Deleting as too obscure is another option.
----
Here are my own comments on the above suggestions:
On the deleting suggestion, I don't agree with the notion that the category is too obscure. Sure, there aren't many articles on the subject here in Wikipedia, but I'd say this is a temporary situation. It follows from the fact that this philosophical school's authors and students aren't that much interested in technology to begin with, specially when it comes to wiki editing. Most are in the pre-blog days yet, and IMHO it's just a matter of time for them to catch up. Once it happens, I'm confident there'll be enough material to warrant a WikiProject of its own.
But I agree with the renaming proposition, as the term "Traditionalism" is really too generic. My suggestion is for it to be renamed "Sophia Perennis". This returns many results on Google Scholar, most of them closely related to the school and its subject matter. (Please notice that my suggestion is for the "Perennis" word to begin with an uppercase "P", since this is the way it's used on a lot of the scholar articles and in the perennialists' books themselves.)
This would require a some changes to the Sophia Perennis page, but I think it's worth it. I'd move it to Sophia Perennis (disambiguation), then create a new Sophia Perennis page redirecting to Traditionalist School, and add there a link to the renamed disambiguation page.
What do you think? -- alexgieg (talk) 13:46, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion/Renaming/Merging Nomination
Talk:Sushi Pack

message: 50.19.0.84 posted this comment on 1 May 2013 (view all feedback).
I would like to see what reception the show received, please.
Any thoughts?
Puffin Let's talk! 20:08, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reader feedback: I would like to see what rec... 

message: Please add Season 2 Episodes on this show please?
https://www.google.com/search?safe=strict&rlz=1C1CHBF_en-GBGB843GB844&sxsrf=ACYBGNT4BuNxxtm7BKxsGUxO8bAoraEHmw%3A1581013314513&ei=Qlk8XpqBH9T9gAa3rK-IDQ&q=sushi+pack+season+2&oq=sushi+pack+sea&gs_l=psy-ab.3.2.35i39l2j0l2j0i22i30l3.11323.13651..14860...1.2..0.162.653.0j5......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i71j0i67j0i20i263j33i21.zBM6RHt_D08  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leo02-2002 (talk • contribs) 18:22, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Season 2 Episodes!
Talk:George Morrison (acting teacher)

message: Word is, some user objects to the Chicago Wikiproject banner? George Morrison is from Evanston, and attended the University of Chicago. In any case, WikiProjects don't have to justify their interest in a topic. The more eyes on a page, the better the page will be. I'm adding WP Biography's banner here, as it is appropriate as well.{unsign|Speciate|18:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes a bot checks all articles at WP:CHIBOTCATS twice a week to see if there are any new articles that do not have .  The basic logic is that if the category is important enough to be included in the article, then we as a project want to track the article.  Let me know if having the tag causes any problems.  If you do not feel the category is relevant to the article you can remove it and then if you remove the project tag it will not reappear.  In this case note that two different categories are causing the tag to appear.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD)  19:01, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Banners
Talk:English Tangier

message: Nothing? Seriously... ? — LlywelynII 10:31, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Battle of Tangier (1664)]]

message: Further reading sections aren't explicitly forbidden, but they really ought to be for articles that don't have someone paying attention, curating, and consistently formatting and pruning them. Kindly add these sources back to the article as they are used to verify statements within the running text itself:
* ADM 106/294 (Roger Allsopp, 1673)
* ADM 106/314
* ADM 12/18
* ADM 12/28B
* CO 279 National Archives (Public Records Office) Board of Trade Tangier Original Correspondence, etc.
* Chappell, E., ed. The Tangier Papers of Samuel Pepys (London: Navy Records Society, vol. LXIII, 1935)
* Childs, J. The Army of Charles II (London: Routledge, 1976)
* Halkett, J. 'Tangier – 1680: The Diary of Sir James Halkett', in Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research (1922)
* Lord, W.F. The Lost Possessions of England (London: Richard Bentley & Son, 1896)
* Luke, John. Diary. B. Museum Add. MSS. 36528 
* Luke, Samuel. British Library Manuscript Collection, Sloan MSS. 
* Smithers, A.J. The Tangier Campaign: the Birth of the British Army (Stroud: 2003)
* Walton, C. A History of the British Standing Army, 1660-1700 (London: 1894)
 — LlywelynII 13:16, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for future article expansion