lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Esky

message: This looks like a cheap advertisement. If it's the same as a "cooler", then a definition and a link to "cooler" would be sufficient as the construction details are the same anyway.
See "Biro" for example:
Ballpoint pen, the British English and Australian English word
89.102.4.222 (talk) 08:19, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Why describe construction methods of a cooler? This article is about just the brand name "Esky", not coolers per se. Format (talk) 05:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is the design and construction unique? Was it unique at the time it was first released? If so, its more than just a cooler. Also, coolers will not mention the unique Australian cultural links. Mdw0 (talk) 02:25, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: But if the things you ask are not true, then it is not anything more than a cooler. The "unique" cultural links (the use of the brand name "Esky" in some song lyrics - but not in any famous or iconic songs) are certainly not notable. The article on Pepsi does not mention all the references to that product in songs, in Joan Crawford movies, in MAD Magazine articles, even though all those things certainly occurred. Format (talk) 06:55, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement?

message: searching wikipedia for the New Zealand term of "chilly bin" redirects here where it may be more appropriate to redirect to cooler which is a page that has details about the New Zealand terminology.    I'm not sure how to modify the redirect.  Can anyone change this if I can't find it.     (time to have some cold drinks on ice)
203.206.56.226 (talk) 04:31, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Chilly Bin

message: The cooler is an american invention... not an australian one. Esky is just a word.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.4.63.151 (talk) 19:26, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Esky is a brand name, only. There is no real need for this page as it stood with descriptions of cooler construction, etc. This article is currently a mess and probably should be a DAB page. (The references about Esky (cooler) aren't great and hardly establish reason why  Esky (cooler) needs its own page rather than being mentioned in the main cooler page.) Format (talk) 18:21, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: no, esky is a part of our lexicon; it's not an invention, it's technological development. you're only saying this because people from the US feel the need to have invented everthing. 124.170.101.76 (talk) 08:15, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Invention?

message: Some refs that cover topic in significant detail.
Hack (talk) 14:36, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:James E. English

message: There's also California's James L. English; do we need a disambiguation page?--Orange Mike 05:05, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the paragraph that refers to the historical inaccuracy in Stephan Shpeelburg's film, Brandegee is called a Democrat, but he seems to be called a Republican elsewhere (including Wikipedia's list of Connecticut congressional delegations).  I'm guessing it should be changed here (and also in the Brandgeee article, with a similar error regarding Brandegee)? Arnold Rothstein1921 (talk) 21:02, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I made the change to Republican.  Another editor made the change in the Brandegee article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arnold Rothstein1921 (talk • contribs) 01:55, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Being a relative of him and having the correspondences that Lincoln wrote to him from his lap desk i can tell you they portrayed him wrong,  He was against slavery but didn't want to do it in a way that would cause a civil war.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.75.43.154 (talk) 21:53, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Congressman Brandegee Democrat or Republican?
Talk:Akron, Ontario

message: Okay, I give up...where in the name of holy flaming crap is this place? It's not on any map of Ontario in my possession, and a Google search brings up no discernible hits that aren't Wikipedia or its mirrors. But if I go to the Canadian census data site and type in Akron, damned if I don't get routed straight to the census subdivision of "Algoma, Unorganized, North Part", precisely as claimed here. So it clearly exists...but I'm still left to wonder, where the hell is it? Bearcat 05:07, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it does exist (see this document), but the info shows up only for the 1996 census locality data, not for 2001. The Algoma District, Ontario article suggests it's a town; it was added recently (diff), but the  summary suggests the user doesn't know the place, and was just guessing. I have no idea where it is. I've left a message with the article's creator (SD6-Agent). Note that GeoNames says there are two other places in Algoma with Akron in their names. I'm sure this is not coincidental. Mindmatrix 15:03, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Info seems hard to come by.  But it does have an entry in the Atlas of Canada.  Unincorporated area.
Latitude and Longitude: 48o 55' 0" North  84o 7' 0" West.  You can see the location here.   --JGGardiner 17:48, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

text: This Ministry of Transportation map also shows it.   --JGGardiner 18:37, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice find. I've updated the page with information from that map. I'm sure others could probably expand on that. Mindmatrix 18:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  It's tough.  There's very few references.  I checked factivia and elsewhere for newspaper mentions and there is really nothing.  Must be quite a small place.  I was trying to make sense of this Health ministry document  which identifies the community (along with nearby Dana) as part of the township of Irving.  --JGGardiner 19:03, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good find. From the way it's depicted on the maps, I suspect this is actually one of those little railway depots with a historical population of five, that now exists only as a sign hanging beside the railroad track. But, of course, I wouldn't want to state that as a fact without proof. Bearcat 21:09, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's probably correct.  In fact, I haven't seen any evidence that anyone lives there.  No phone numbers and no postal code indicates that it collects for the area.  Just the census note and the Health coding info.  I wonder if our entry should say that it is a historical community because I see no evidence that it is actually inhabited now as the article implies.  --JGGardiner 00:16, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've checked the Ontario GeoNames Index, and Akron is indeed listed as a railway point. Bearcat 23:11, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Myron (novel)

message: One of the brilliant things about this novel is that certain parts of the human body are named for Supreme Court justices: "Rehnquist" a dick, "Powell" an ass, etc. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.73.68.28 (talk) 02:11, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gore Vidal novel "Myron" -- Rehnquist
Talk:Tempe Butte

message: All descriptions I have found of Tempe's A-Mountain use this descriptor.  Who set off the bomb blast, the Army Corps of Engineers, a couple of disgruntled underwater basketweaving majors, University of Arizona students. Al-Qaeda?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Autkm (talk • contribs) 06:15, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Destroyed by a Bomb Blast in 1952

message: Apparently the original name "Tempe Butte" was changed in 1961 to honor local notables named Hayden, but the change never made it to US Geological Survey. The city of Tempe uses "Hayden Butte" in an official way but according to The Clio, many others don't. OR warning, and based on just a few visits to the area: my fellow-hikers up the side of it called it "A Mountain." Google has about 70,000 results for "Hayden Butte" and only about 14,000 for "Tempe Butte." "'A Mountain' Tempe" has more than 700,000 results.  Maybe we should consider renaming/moving the page, but if so I think "A Mountain" is at least as good a choice as either butte. I updated the article with some related RS. HouseOfChange (talk) 16:57, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tempe Butte versus Hayden Butte versus A Mountain
Talk:Heparin-coated blood oxygenator

message: Can someone in the medical field expand this entry by discussing "pump head", the brain damage that occurs from the continuous flow of oxygen microbubbles from the blood pump?
Should this be merged with Heart-lung machine? 169.237.97.2 23:50, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk about "Pump Head" 

message: Oxygenator and this article seem obvious candidates
for a merge, or some sort of reorganization, anyway.  At the moment the
article with the more specific title is much more detailed, which seems
unbalanced, but it's also tagged NPOV.  208.76.104.133 21:06, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Trần Đức Lương

message: Barely a Start class.
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 19:06, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment
Talk:Intermediate zone

message: Removed material about gurus that was neither verifiable or properly sourced. Please do not revert unless you have verifiable sources. Self-pub websites do not qualify. Succinct1 (talk) 01:10, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed material in violation of WP: V, WP:RS,  
Talk:Bwana Devil

message: If you're talking about theatrical films, that's almost certainly correct. But there was a color 3D film made for GM's 1939 World's Fair exhibit. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 22:17, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Just fixed the problem by adding the qualification "feature-length" to the claim. For the record: there were TWO versions of the GM film, a black-and-white one shown during the Fair's 1939 season, now lost, and a color remake (with a later model car) shown during the 1940 season. The latter was re-released theatrically in 1953 as "Motor Rhythm" and is available on a 3D Blu-ray compilation. 66.81.245.151 (talk) 11:21, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: First color 3D film?
Talk:Joe Carpenter (R.O.D)

message: In episode 14 of R.O.D TV during Wendy's history recap she mentions the newphew of The Gentleman and a picture with Joker is shown (04:47 or so). Does the manga ever make this connection? Gront 06:37, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Niigata

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: (non-admin closure) PROCEDURAL CLOSE no rationale, possibly a test edit by a new user.  User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 21:15, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Niigata →  – Place here your rationale for the proposed page name change, ideally referring to applicable naming convention policies and guidelines, and providing evidence in support where appropriate. If your reasoning includes search engine results, please prioritize searches limited to reliable sources (e.g. books, news, scholarly papers) over other web results. You don't need to add your signature at the end, as this template will do so automatically. Convoice2 (talk) 14:33, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 August 2021 
Talk:Nikkō Tōshō-gū

message: There is one more article Tōshō-gū - just the same object as this one Nikkō Tōshō-gū
    Edal (talk) 12:14, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication of Tōshō-gū articles 

message: I believe that the photo labeled as "Lavish decoration on Yomei-mon" shows the  rather than the gate Yomei-mon. bamse (talk) 00:21, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Fg2 (talk) 00:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caption in photo gallery
Talk:Okazaki, Aichi

message: All in all this is a wonderful article and from first hand experience I can honestly state that the information here is extremely accurate. However there is not a single reference in the whole of the article. I will do my best to find some on my own and add them here (as time permits), but I would also greatly appreciate it if the original poster would chime in as well. Also as a side note, I live in Okazaki and my wife was born and raised there, as a result I have access to a large amount of reference sources but they are mainly in Japanese. What is the standard practice with non-English sources? Can they be referenced at all? Colincbn 02:35, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Tokugawa Ieyoshi

message: An interested editor "tweaked" the succession boxes in articles about the 15 Tokugawa shoguns; and the change became a thread topic at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan#Tokugawa shoguns.  Although a corollary thread topic was posted at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Royalty#Japanese shoguns, no comments or suggestions were elicited.
Aumnamahashiva substituted "regnal" succession boxes; and an plausible  rationale for those edits was offered, focusing primarily on the functional sense in which the Tokugawas were hereditary autocrats.  In contrast was an argument that the regnal succession box is, by definition, misapplied.  Although the terms "reign" and "rule" are conventionally used by scholars, neither the Tokugawa, the Ashikaga, the Hōjō nor the Minamoto shoguns were "royalty" as that term is defined in Japanese history and culture.
Participation in this thread was limited, but I construed it as sufficient justification to restore the previous (non-regnal) succession box.  This explanation and the links to soon-to-be-archived threads may prove to be helpful in the  future? --Tenmei (talk) 14:47, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Succession box

message: In the 2nd to last paragraph under 'Biography' it says: "Ieyoshi died on June 22, 1853 before (...)" whereas the info box gives the date as 27 July 1853. 190.22.185.4 (talk) 22:33, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death
Talk:Pacific Overtures

message: Does anyone have a source cited for this statement:
"Some, however, felt that while the musical themes are top-notch Sondheim, the lyrics come across as a press release for modern Japan."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.103.220.164 (talk) 22:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Press Release For Modern Japan"??

message: Surely the second table in the Awards and Nomination section must be for the 2003 London revival, as the Original London production was in 1987.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.213.109 (talk) 22:39, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards and Nominations 
Talk:Pooh's Grand Adventure: The Search for Christopher Robin

message: Even though IMDb lists the USA rating as G, the MPAA search engine does not have this film listed under any rating. Here search for "Pooh" and just two films, neither of them this one, show up. -24.92.44.95 (talk) 15:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating? 

message: This film isn't the finale of The New Adventures Of Winnie The Pooh. It's A Very Merry Pooh Year. The fist four of all five specials are all based on that show and aired on T.V. first and they are featurettes. Pooh's Grand Adventures came straight to video and it's feature film. See list of the New Adventures Of Winnie The Pooh episodes.
--Evope (talk) 18:55, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Adventures Of Winnie The Pooh
Talk:Pocahontas II: Journey to a New World

message: Very surprising mistake
I am here because I watched the film with my kids last night. Although I did not have high expectations for history accuracy and the film was indeed more fiction than history, I was amazed to see the Union Jack on the English ships in at least 2 scenes. The version of the flag they chose in Disney was the current one, with all 3 crosses. As I remember, under the Stuarts' union of the crowns the kingdoms were only ruled by the same king and there was no UK nor Union Jack. Even when the flag was finally adopted in the following century, it was the naval version that was displayed on ships.
Also, depicting King James the 6th and 1st as a dumb despot was unexpected from an American film. I am not exactly a westerner myself (my people were banned from England until the 1650's), but I thought he enjoyed good reputation in the west for his contribution to Christianity. Wasn't he the scholar king? What am I missing?
192.55.54.42 (talk) 16:59, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Whoever was doing the voice of Powhatan, couldn't have been Russell Means. I can tell different voices, basically, in a heartbeat, and I truly do believe Powhatan was voiced by Jim Cummings for this movie. -- 173.76.123.202 (talk) 15:42, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Powhatan's voice 

message: Judy Kuhn should be wiki linked: Judy Kuhn 184.58.24.163 (talk) 18:24, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done with thanks, NiciVampireHeart 18:36, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request March 21, 2014 

message: Can somebody add that this is drama? I saw on imdb.
--97.113.114.127 (talk) 00:03, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: *Imdb is not a reliable source by Wikipedia standards. Aoba47 (talk) 21:49, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  genre
Talk:Bureau of Heraldry

message: This Bill is very interesting, but I don't grasp its relevance to an article which is specifically about the South African Bureau of Heraldry.
-- Arthur R 17:29, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Irish Genealogy & Heraldry Bill

message: The Bureau of Heraldry does not "grant" arms. They register them as they are authorized to do. Just because it is similar to a grant in the English, Irish, or Scottish sense, that does not make them grants. --Boven 07:05, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Grant or Registration

message: There is far too much unexplained jargon and technical terminology in this article for the general reader. Roger (talk) 20:13, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you identify specific problem areas, so that I can work on them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arthur R (talk • contribs) 15:40, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  A few words: Armiger, blazons, and the entire description (well I think it is a description but I'm not really sure) of the Bureau's own arms is double gobbledygook. Where articles that explain the jargon already exist they should be wikilinked to the jargon word or if there is no such article a brief parenthetical explanation or definition will do. Thanks Roger (talk) 12:07, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You've fixed it nicely, thanks. Roger (talk) 19:28, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much jargon 

message: I note with interest that this article does not feature the Bureau of Heraldry of South Africa's coat of arms? Why is this? Occasionally I see the coat of arms of the South African government confused as the arms of the Bureau of Heraldry which is incorrect.
==================
The arms are mentioned and described in the article.  If anyone can make a decent image of them, it would certainly add to the page.
Arthur R (talk) 18:42, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bureau of Heraldry Coat of Arms 

message: The arms are mentioned and described in the article.  If anyone can make a decent image of them, it would certainly add to the page.
Arthur R (talk) 18:42, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: ======
Talk:Seasons of Giving

message: Winnie the Pooh: Seasons of Giving → Seasons of Giving — The first part of these existing names is arguably not part of title, but rather info about which cartoon characters star in the film, analogous to how for example the short film The Autograph Hound, where the poster says "Donald Duck" above that title (see poster at that article), is not considered to have a title of Donald Duck: The Autograph Hound, or how almost any album cover includes the artist name without us considering that to be part of the album title. See also Tigger and Pooh and a Musical Too which also has the "My Friends Tigger & Pooh" wording on the cover. Mepolypse (talk) 20:46, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: . Jafeluv (talk) 09:39, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Mickey's Twice Upon a Christmas

message: We've watched the Belle's on Ice segment several times but cannot find the "grumpy dog" character that appears in the other four segments.
Jmattbuchanan (talk) 02:26, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recurring "Grumpy Dog" character in "Belles on Ice" 

message: There was just an edit, claiming that Pluto deliberately destroys the tree. Incorrect, he is over eager to put on the star, climbs a ladder, it wobbles, and causes a chain reaction.  -- Zanimum (talk) 20:15, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unintendedly/intentionally
Talk:Alkyl nitrite

message: de it nl fr es <-- for those the connections are wrong; the german should go to de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amylnitrit (It don't know how to change it) --79.199.86.160 (talk) 14:51, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong connection to other languages 

message: In the mechanism shown, I think it's far more likely that the first step proceeds via an enolate, rather than the comparatively unstable carbanion shown. Is there a reason why it has been drawn in this way? 92.24.131.217 (talk) 16:56, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction to quinine total synthesis mechanism? 

message: Davidbengtenglund has proposed that Poppers be merged into this article, so I'm adding a section to discuss this.
For my part, I'm in favour in theory, but I'd like to see the issues currently flagged in the Poppers article cleaned up before any merge effort is made.
—me_and 14:50, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New merge discussion 

message: What exactly is meant by "first few members of the series"? The fisrt to be 'discovered'/ studied/ known/ used? But then, why is this followed by "are"? Are these still the fist members? Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 10:06, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  First members? 

message: The best way is 1. dissolving the alcohol in a solution of sodium nitrite in water; and 2. stir this well and add dilute acid drop by drop. I used phosphoric acid, because it forms a buffer which prevents the pH from getting too low. When the solution is too acidic, a  lot of NO and NO2 is formed. So nitrous acid is lost and no more converted to the alkyl nitrite you want to prepare. Hope you know how toxic these gases are! --FK1954 (talk) 21:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synthesis
Talk:Buzz Lightyear of Star Command: The Adventure Begins

message: Is that a new word used in the film ? Isn't the correct term "stowed away" ? -- Beardo (talk) 14:02, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stowawayed ? 

message: — Assignment last updated by DarthVetter (talk) 16:56, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Composition I - Writing Wikipedia, section 2