Talk:Isotopes of flerovium

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Isotopes of ununquadium's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "00Og01":
From Ununhexium: 
From Ununquadium: 
Reference named "04Og01":
From Ununquadium: 
From Ununhexium: 
From Copernicium: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:32, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Isotopes of ununquadium]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Isotopes of flerovium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080528130343/http://www.jinr.ru/publish/Preprints/2004/160%28E7-2004-160%29.pdf to http://www.jinr.ru/publish/Preprints/2004/160%28E7-2004-160%29.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:13, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Possibly they are 288Nh and 284Rg? Burzuchius (talk) 11:25, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  <sup>287m</sup>Fl and <sup>283m</sup>Cn 

message: With most or all the other artificial elements that have been given official "real" names, rather than temporary "number names" like "ununquadium" ("one-one-four metal"), there's a history of the name. This one should have an explanation too. --Thnidu (talk) 02:17, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The explanations are at the main element articles, in this case in Flerovium#Naming. Double sharp (talk) 03:38, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you. --Thnidu (talk) 11:25, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of name? 

message: According to , one would expect 295Fl and 297Fl to have half-lives on the order of several days. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 00:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most stable isotopes of Fl 

message: So I heard a bit back that compound nuclei tend to fission by expelling closed shell nuclei (such as 132Sn), so if we made a compound nucleus with Z=196-200ish that would fission by expelling the closed shell 208Pb, we could get 298Fl. This would optimally be done with the 257Fm+257Fm reaction, which would make a compound nucleus with Z=200 and N=314 that would expel 208Pb to make... 306Og, which would quickly expel two alpha particles to make 298Fl. One possible flaw is that the fission could also get rid of several neutrons, however that could still discover new isotopes at the end of the periodic table. I'm also not sure if it'd fission like compound nuclei produced when synthesizing superheavy elements do, but multinucleon transfer could still end up producing cool new isotopes of superheavy elements (such as 271Db) 24.115.255.37 (talk) 02:26, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think I have an idea on how to synthesize <sup>298</sup>Fl