lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Federal enclave

message: Addition of this sizable amount of information by an expert is valued, but as Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, the text should be restructured so that it is easily understandable to a layman and conforms to the Wikipedia accessibility guideline, before it can be reincorporated into the article. Especially consider sectioning and wikilinking of the text. Also, and although the term is US-only, US-centric bias should be avoided. The article can not make assumptions about the reader's cultural or geographical background. Whether federal government here refers to the US fed. gov., the German fed. gov. or any fed. gov. in general should be defined in the very first few sentences of the generally concise and summarizing lead, establishing the subject's notability. Please see other articles for reference, or just read Writing your first article.
As development of the article seems to have stalled after the addition of this large chunk of text, I have reverted to a previous version predating the edits by Mr. Haines. You can still continue editing from where you left here. --hydrox (talk) 07:57, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This information has since been successfully incorporated to the article. --hydrox (talk) 02:03, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted
Talk:Territorial jurisdiction (United States)

message: I have deleted the section on "jurisdiction creep" because it is misleading, and probably wholly inaccurate. Although the Constitution specifies only a few crimes, it gives Congress substantial power to legislate with respect to, inter alia, interstate commerce, copyright, and collecting taxes. It also gives Congress the power to take such steps as are "necessary and proper" to carry out those powers. If Congress could, for example, forbid interstate commerce in a product, or levy a tax on the sale of a product, but could not punish people who engaged in that commerce or refused to pay that tax, it would be impotent. But so long as the crime is defined under any of the powers of Congress (including the very broadly defined commerce clause power, and the power of taxation) then the executive may prosecute that crimes wherever it is committed, in any U.S. State or territory. See United States v. Morrison for an example of the limits of that doctrine. bd2412 T 03:51, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article could definitely use some sourcing. I think this one may take some time. Famspear (talk) 04:00, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Jurisdiction creep

message: I'm deleting the sentence "Unlike subject-matter jurisdiction, territorial jurisdiction may be waived, even unintentionally, by a defendant." First, it should say "the defense of a lack of territorial jurisdiction may be waived ..." But, even if that were corrected, I can't find any support for this sentence. References say that the defense of a lack of personal jurisdiction may be unintentionally waived. If there's a citation for territorial jurisdiction, then the sentence could be restored. KHirsch (talk) 18:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Waiver of jurisdiction"
Talk:Personal jurisdiction in Internet cases in the United States

message: If we could get some kind of pastel box which says "this is a rapidly changing area of law" that'd be great. Also, is there any kind of "the person who wrote this isn't liable for anything if you rely on it" pastel box?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Snitkofb (talk • contribs) 18:06, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ron Jon Surfpark

message: the last link on the article page was added after the first edit, the link gives the article the notability it needs to prevent it being speedly deleted—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ljcsponger87 (talk • contribs) 
:I stubified the page, removed some fluff, and added a few reliable sources. I think that now, the article is sufficient for asserting notability. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 06:41, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  new link added
Talk:List of city managers of San Jose, California

message: It's not clear how many of the San Jose City Managers are candidates for articles besides Dutch Hamann.  Thomas Reed almost certainly is.  Probably Goodwin.  It may be that the others should be addressed by annotating the list with birth and death dates and a short bio.--Hjal (talk) 06:50, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do list
Talk:Santa Cruz sheep

message: So the sheep are not native to the island right?  Shouldn't that be spelled out?  TastyCakes (talk) 23:29, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sheep (domestic ones) are not native anywhere in the Americas, or most of the world. Steven Walling (talk) 02:00, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: The article's current image is poor. It is requested that a better image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Coycan (talk) 00:04, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Photograph
Talk:White Bicycles

message: This article should be merged into Joe Boyd.
(comment by User:76.22.20.146)
: The book has a wealth of historical detail which, if summarized, would absolutely merit it's own article. As it stands it's PR fluff. I would agree. Wwwhatsup (talk) 08:23, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction)/Archive 18

message: I've removed the reference to Alyosha Karamazov, suggesting it was a 'good' redirect. Whilst I am loathe to remove examples of fiction outside the comfort zone, the idea that there is not enough real world info about the main character of Dostoevsky's magnum opus is implausible.--Nydas(Talk) 10:06, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, indeed--you got there first, but I've been intending for some time to write the article.  858 GS hits, including 2 articles and 3 theses with his name in the very title. This is probably true for all main characters of classic fiction--the academics have been working on all the possibilities. That's what they do, analyze plot and characters. Haven't even tried the many specialized indexes, let alone pre-Google. On the other hand, it might have been nice to leave it in to show the absurdity of the guideline. DGG (talk) 01:08, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made a start. There's mountains of information about the character, it should never have been redirected.--Nydas(Talk) 14:54, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[The Brothers Karamazov]]
Talk:Noley Thornton

message: As a WP:BLP, I culled the article of all unverified information, striking everything uncited and rebuilt it with 100% referencing.  The prior version is here for anybody interested in going back to try and reference any of the information that had been there with reliable sources.  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 06:50, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reconstitution

message: According to IMDB, her birthday is December 30, 1983.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0861572/?ref_=tt_cl_t9  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.10.91.227 (talk) 05:01, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, the IMDb isn't a reliable source.  —  fourthords | =Λ= | 05:50, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  putting  1980s is perfectly reasonable given the visual evidence of her physical appearance in her acting roles and there are plenty of Wikipedia articles where circa is an acceptable substitute for an unknown exact birth date. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 01:28, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  What you believe to be "perfectly reasonable" is your interpretation and original research.  —  fourthords | =Λ= |  02:29, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

text: Crud. I just changed her b-day back to 1983 based on both Rotten Tomatoes and IMDB without realizing this had at some point been contentious. However, what's missing here is any source or justification for a 1982 b-day. Is there something that makes 1982 superior to 1983? Or are they both best guess based on poorly-sourced information? If a RS doesn't exist, and the info is potentially incorrect or contentious, her DOB should not be listed at all, per [WP:BLP]. IMO, the sources we have (RT & IMDB) are weak (both user-edited), and the info is therefore potentially incorrect, but her DOB is a non-contentious statistic that does not qualify or disqualify her for anything. Besides, most people prefer to be thought of as young, and a younger age makes her remarkable acting as a child even more impressive. (Can that itself make it contentious?) I say we err on the side of youth and the existence of weak evidence as opposed to no evidence to the contrary. Otherwise we should delete her DOB from the article until a non-user-edited RS can be found. Either suits me. Dcs002 (talk) 03:51, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, how about this?  It's a commercial source, not user-edited, and the info is not behind a paywall. I think it's stronger than other sources I've found, but I don't know much about the company, or whether the source is secondary or tertiary. I don't see anything that excludes it as a RS. The only source I've found so far that says 1982 is Google, which gets its info from WP. Thoughts? Dcs002 (talk) 04:16, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthday
Talk:Gary Burtless

message: Would the editor who placed that template please give me more than 1 minute to finish the aricle! Please, wait a second. Thanks, Signaturebrendel 07:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The tag was put on this article less than 5 minutes - before I could even finish the third edit. This hastidly added tag is not warranted as Dr. Burtless has published 11 books, numerous articles and there are 2,350 google hits for "Gary T Burtless" & 25,200 for "Gary Burtless." He is notable enough for a WP entry. Regards, Signaturebrendel 07:27, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Looking over the six guidelines for notability (in academia), he meets all of them. He is certainly more notable than the average professor as the over-the-thumb rule suggests. Regards, Signaturebrendel 07:34, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Command

message: The Command and Conquer series has several faulty links which redirect to this page. Can someone compile a link of all of them?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.186.204 (talk) 04:45, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Command and Conquer

message: Shouldn't this page discuss commands in the sense of orders? I command that this be done!
Also, I'd like an etymology section should that page be added. Is the word Roman in origin? I would assume so, considering its shared phoneme -mand with demand, but I'd prefer more professional minds take this up.
68.102.237.253 (talk) 03:18, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: commands in the sense of orders

message: There's no mention of them anywhere on Wikipedia that I can see, but perhaps it might be worth mentioning somewhere that Command is also a 3M brand of temporary adhesive-based fastener products. —ReadOnlyAccount (talk) 10:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Command hooks
Talk:Ameena Begum

message: To Crusio attention:
According to a dictionary, "notable" can refer to one of two general concepts:
"Notable" can mean "worthy of note". A "note" is a written record, so notable means "worthy of written records". 
"Notable can refer to the concept of being important, significant, famous, unique, etc. 
Of these two definitions, only the first is in line with Wikipedia policy and practice.
Dear Sergey, thank you for the dictionary definitions of "notability". Unfortunately, notability has its own, special meaning onWikipedia. I suggest you read the policy article on notability. I see that you have added some references to the article, but they still don't seem to establish notability of Pirani Ameena Begum, only (perhaps) of her husband and daughter. By the way, this discussion should better be placed at the AfD page and I will copy your comments and my reply there. --Crusio (talk) 10:53, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: According to Wikipedia convention, titles (such as "Dr", "Prof", "His Holyness", Queen, etc) are not included in article titles (see for example Elisabeth II). According to the article, "Pirani" is a title that Inayat Khan bestowed upon his loving spouse Ameena Begum. It would therefore appear that the correct title of this article would be "Ameena Begum". --Crusio (talk) 12:32, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  article title
Talk:Loa (disambiguation)

message: The following content had no proper place, in this detailed form, on the accompanying Dab page, but probably should be modified for use in the appropriate fish and roundworm pages. NB: there is potentially misleading comment on the roundworms on the  Chaetodon page, but these roundworms (nor any others, i expect) do NOT belong to genus  Chaetodon.
: * Loa (roundworm), a roundworm genus established by Stiles in 1905, see Chaetodon
: * Loa, a butterflyfish genus invalidly established by Jordan in 1921, now included in Chaetodon'
--Jerzy•t 11:16, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loa ambiguity
Talk:Jack Hunter (English footballer)

message: There seems to be a slight variation in his date of death. The Betts book cited in the article gives this as 13 April 1903, whereas Phythian's history of Blackburn Olympic gives 9 April. The only on-line reference I can find gives 10 April 1903.   Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 05:10, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death
Talk:Port of Rotterdam

message: This article describes the MS Berge Stahl as "the largest bulk cargo ship in the world". However, the wikipedia page for the MS Berge Stahl says " Until the delivery of MS Vale Brasil in 2011 she was the longest and largest iron ore carrier in the world." I have therefore revised this page to be consistent with the MS Berge Stahl reference. Cobalt60blue (talk) 01:00, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency with linked article
Talk:Ken McIntyre

message: Originally this page redirected to Makanda Ken McIntyre, then the redirect was changed to Kenneth Gordon McIntyre. I now changed the redirect into a disambiguation page linking to both articles. I checked the "What links here" which only listed two articles, both intending Makanda Ken McIntyre. Fixed that too. ---Sluzzelin talk 07:35, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:National Assembly of Zambia

message: From the National Assembly members link there appear to be re-enlisted by now.http://www.parliament.gov.zm/members/party--WeifengYang (talk) 12:29, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are UPND member's still under suspension?
Talk:Liuwa Plain National Park

message: On behalf of African Parks via the Wyss Foundation, and as part of my work at Beutler Ink, I am submitting an expanded and updated draft of this article for community review. You can view my proposed draft here. 
The current article looks developed, at first glance, but this is deceiving. The "History" section is a single paragraph with a single inline citation. The "Location, Access and Accommodation" section is entirely unsourced, and the last three paragraphs are particularly unencyclopedic. The African Parks website is used as 2 of 3 inline citations in the "Wildlife" section, one of which is not currently functioning. I'd say most of the sourcing throughout the article is (far) less than ideal. I've worked to create an accurate, neutral, and sourced overview of the park, its wildlife (including Lady Liuwa and the lion population), history, and tourism, similar to articles for other parks. African Parks has provided feedback to ensure accuracy.
I seek uninvolved editors to review the draft for accuracy and neutrality, and hope they'll conclude that the proposed draft is a major improvement over the existing article.  You've been helping with this series of article updates, and I wanted to bring this one to your attention as well, if you're interested.
As a reminder, this edit request is part of a series to create and expand several Wikipedia articles related to African Parks. You can learn more here: User:Inkian Jason/African Parks. Thank you. Inkian Jason (talk) 15:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made a wholesale replacement with the proposed draft into mainspace. The proposed draft was clearly superior in every way to the original article which was largely sourced to non-RS. Chetsford (talk) 21:01, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you very much for reviewing the draft. Unless you object, I'd like to remove this article from Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon/Core stubs - Zambia, since the article is no longer a stub. Thanks again for your help. Inkian Jason (talk) 21:04, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not object. Chetsford (talk) 21:05, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:   I should be sharing a draft for Zakouma National Park soon, if you are interested. Inkian Jason (talk) 21:08, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, Inkian Jason. Just ping me whenever. Chetsford (talk) 22:06, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draft article
Talk:Capital account convertibility

message: I understand capital account convertibility to refer to free conversion at market rates, not preset rates, nor at low rates. Is there a slightly different use of the term in India? Finnancier (talk) 07:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Capital account convertibility allows conversion at market rates or at preset/low rates?

message: This article should be merged with Capital control. Jackzhp (talk) 06:07, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: merge suggestion

message: Though they are related topics. Users will find themselves in a confused state... This happens a lot with newbies.
So, let this article be as it is!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.97.234.149 (talk) 12:11, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No... it shouldn't be! 

message: Dr. von Hagen has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. von Hagen has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Jurgen von Hagen & Haiping Zhang, 2011. "Financial Development and the Patterns of International Capital Flows," Working Papers 21-2011, Singapore Management University, School of Economics.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 02:37, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. von Hagen's comment on this article
Talk:List of companies of Ghana

message: The Bank of Ghana (BOG) hereby informs the general public that the Ghana Monetary Agency (GMA) which purports to have been established in 1960 by Presidential Decree No. 0186 to monitor and control the Bank of Ghana as amended to suit the Bank of Ghana (Amendment) Act, 1965 (Act 282) Decree 1973 is not and has not at any time been incorporated or registered in Ghana or licensed by the Bank of Ghana.
We wish to alert the public that the GMA, through its website www.gma-gh.com, is fraudulently seeking to recruit employees and provide unlicensed financial services. We therefore advise that any persons or organisations dealing or intending to deal with GMA, do so at their own peril.
Any person with information that Ghana Monetary Agency (GMA) is conducting banking business or who wishes to make enquiries about any other business entity engaged in the financial sector, should contact the Bank of Ghana on telephone numbers: +233-302-666174-6, +233-302-666361-5, +233-302-666921-5 or fax: +233-302-662996, +233-302-665074 or e-mail: governors.department@bog.gov.gh. 
http://bog.gov.gh/index1.php?linkid=314&archiveid=2164&page=1&adate=07%2F10%2F2011  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nidagher (talk • contribs) 09:41, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: GHANA MONETARY AGENCY

message: The following list is of the companies without Wikipedia articles and companies without websites, please if you can create a article for any of the following companies feel free to do so, then when the article(s) has/have been created for the company in this list, it could then be added to the List of companies of Ghana.
   
===Companies without Wikipedia Articles===
This is a list of companies in Ghana. 
*d-K lair Industriesd-k lair
*Elektromediks (Ghana) Limited
*Emos Consultancy Limited
*Rostilupt Online ShoppingRostilupt  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Obteo (talk • contribs) 20:22, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: List of companies of Ghana

message: This is a list of companies in Ghana. 
*d-K lair Industriesd-k lair
*Elektromediks (Ghana) Limited
*Emos Consultancy Limited
*Rostilupt Online ShoppingRostilupt  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Obteo (talk • contribs) 20:22, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Companies without Wikipedia Articles

message: MarkMysoe (talk) 11:26, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Ecoregions of Zambia

message: This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of February 2, 2008, compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?:  The article is not in compliance with the Manual of Style in many major areas. First off, it's use of numbered lists such as in Central Zambezian Miombo woodlands is not condoned by style guidelines. Next, links should never be used in section headings. If you need to link to an article that covers the section's topic or is related, use a  or  link under the heading. Also, the size of many of the headings is off or non-sensical. Using one level headers (=Title=) is not a generally necessary practice for section headings. Use two level headers, third level, and then fourth level in succession. Using level ones and then jumping to level four or five is not okay.
:2. Factually accurate?:  The article almost completely fails the GA criteria for verification. With only one in-line citation, it's nearly a quick-fail candidate. Simply having references is not sufficient. You must attribute facts to sources through the use of in-line citations, using either the footnotes or Harvard referencing system. The GA criteria requires that an article "at minimum, provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged.." Entire sections lacking in-line cites is unacceptable in a GA candidate. Also, the two general references provided are insufficient. Please try and find more reliable and relevant source material. Please remedy the referencing before choosing to renominate.
:3. Broad in coverage?:  Broad in coverage, and stays on topic.
:4. Neutral point of view?:  Fair representation for all significant points of view.
:5. Article stability?  No edit wars, etc.
:6. Images?:  The one image used is properly account for with licensing and such, which is the primary GA images criterion. But the article doesn't comply with WP:MOS#Images, in that its sole image is not used as the lead image (situated to the right as encouraged by the guidelines).
Overall, this article has a large amount of work to be completed before it meets the GA standard. As the work required is extensive, a hold is not appropriate. Please keep up the hard work!
When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated.  If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed.  Thank you for your work so far.</div>— VanTucky 23:52, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed "good article" nomination

message: "Bush fires range across most of the country in the later dry season, escaping from "chitemene cultivation" and caused by villagers burning off crop residue or hunting, as well as by lightning strikes." Source? 83.84.100.133 (talk) 19:15, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Accusation, No Proof