Talk:Hatay Province

message: could you please provide sources for your last additions. thanks at0 15:49, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: The Sanjak of Alexandretta subsection contains a wikilink to Armenian (piped to say Armenians), which is a dab page. Please change this to a link to Armenians. Thanks. Ntsimp 16:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. - auburnpilot talk 21:52, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: How did Turkish tribes get there in 877??????????  
truly bizarre pseudo-history!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.19.85.51 (talk) 21:06, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turks in 877? 

message: Hello,
Please add the Bulgarian interlanguage link to the article: bg:Хатай since article is protected and I can't add any info to it. Thanks. --Vanka5 00:58, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to add interwiki 

message: What is the relation of the article with Syria portal? Is it because of historical links from the past?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryesiloglu (talk • contribs) 14:39, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation with Syria Portal (?) 

message: Since time immemorial, this page has been currently protected from editing "until disputes have been resolved". Which disputes? One of the warring editors from a long-gone-by past has been indef blocked, so I guess we'll never hear his side of the story.  --Lambiam 22:24, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which disputes? 

message: The map by William R. Shepherd is historical inaccurete because according to map there is no Turks in Cyprus. There is a de facto independet state in north Cyprus. In Northern Cyprus articel you can see the history of Turkish population in Cyprus.
Ruzgar 21:35, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  False ethnic map 

message: "Hatay Province" is false.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.229.131.54 (talk) 23:23, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article must change name to Sanjak of Alexandretta 

message: The introductionary paragraph seems to be baised towards the Syrian POV. Which I don't think is the general international concensus on the issue.
Hatay appears as part of Turkey on maps released the UN  (*with disclaimer that the UN doesn't nessecarily endorse the shown borders), the US State Department  and the European Union . And on maps used by Wikipedia itself.
A better intro might be:
Hatay is a Turkish province located on the Mediterranean shore in the south of the country. The province borders Syria on the south and east and the Turkish provinces of Adana and Osmaniye in the north. The province was ceded to Turkey in the 1939 by the French. The Syrian government does not recognize this today, and considers Hatay (or Liwa' aliskenderun (Arabic: لواء الاسكندرون‎) as the Syrians call it) to be part of Syria.
Thoughts?
[edit]
whoops, forgot to sign
Crownsteler (talk) 21:09, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro based towards Syria? 

message: What do people think about the idea of redirecting the term "Hatay" to the "Hatay Province" entry? ThePhantomCopyEditor (talk) 20:40, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: I reverted some of the things britishsyrian had added. The map show Arabs in majority with smaller communities of Armenians and Turks, nothing more. There are no details of the city of Antioch or Iskandaron. The "A modern solution to the dispute that satifies both sides?" section was made up of a lot of guessing. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 22:04, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misinformation 

message: The protest image is named "ProtestsAnnexationAlexanderetta", by changing this it becomes a red link. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 00:01, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protest Image 

message: hatay is kurdistan city! its for me not imporant if hatay is now under turkish state we knwo hatay is our kurdistan s city!
here : http://ku.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xetay_%28par%C3%AAzgeh%29  
http://www.kurdtimes.com/kt-kurd/pix/kurdishmap.gif
http://i1101.hizliresim.com/2011/1/29/696.jpg
kurds  killed by turksih racist state and now its "turkey" ,?ah no no !
greets ali.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.182.34.95 (talk) 19:02, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You have just posted same links you posted above and linked to a Wikipedia article. Your post and links were replied to above . Do you have anything reliable to bring to the conversation or do you want to ad the same unreliable links and made up maps a third time? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 22:55, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  its kurdistan and not "kurdistan" answer to -Supreme Deliciousness and hatay is kurdistan! 

message: Why would the Syrians be divided into religious groups and only the Sunnis will be names "Arabs" while the Turks will be assembled together ? Of course, the reason of this strategy is obvious (to make the turks a plurality) but it wont work. The alawits are not their own ethnicity, neither are the Sunnis nor the Christians.--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 09:47, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Percentages

message: "This referendum has been labelled both "phoney" and "rigged", and a way for the French to let Turks take over the area, hoping that they would turn on Hitler.[9][10] For the referendum, Turkey crossed tens of thousands of Turks into Alexandretta to vote.[11] "
This part largely comes from journalist Robert Fisk's book "The Great War for Civilisation: The Conquest of the Middle East". In the book itself there are no sources for this, considering the book was published by a non academic organization and it had numerous errors (some can be seen in this review https://www.theguardian.com/books/2005/nov/19/highereducation.news) I don't think this two sentences should be in the article. It is not a good source for a encylopedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Solistrum (talk • contribs) 08:52, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source problem 

message: You seem to have misunderstood how Wikipedia works. The edit summary "prove it on talk page" actually has a boomerang effect. Please read WP:BRD. You made a bold removal of template and categories, you were reverted (actually several times). Then it is your duty to discuss in the talk page. The section "Turkish–Syrian dispute" has a well-sourced description of the dispute, and it does not say anything about the dispute being resolved. In order to remove the template and the categories, the section would need to have a sourced description of how the dispute was solved. If not, the categories and the template will stay. --T*U (talk) 10:56, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of template and categories 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hatay Province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080227020342/http://www.law.fsu.edu/library/collection/LimitsinSeas/IBS163.pdf to http://www.law.fsu.edu/library/collection/LimitsinSeas/IBS163.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130903134742/http://www.historyoftruth.com/ebook/kitab20110130094307919.pdf to http://www.historyoftruth.com/ebook/kitab20110130094307919.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:24, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Hatay Province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070602042619/http://www.parliament.gov.sy/ar/syria.php to http://www.parliament.gov.sy/ar/syria.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090111063028/http://www.worldbulletin.net/news_detail.php?id=15361 to http://www.worldbulletin.net/news_detail.php?id=15361
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111004163535/http://www.sana.sy/eng/21/2009/11/22/257425.htm to http://www.sana.sy/eng/21/2009/11/22/257425.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/news-196473-102-pm-vows-to-build-model-partnership-with-syria.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110430154126/http://dmi.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?m=HATAY to http://www.dmi.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?m=HATAY
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930221002/http://www.radikal.com.tr/haber.php?haberno=159475&tarih=23%2F07%2F2005 to http://www.radikal.com.tr/haber.php?haberno=159475&tarih=23%2F07%2F2005
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927203245/http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=24386 to http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=24386
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080417005901/http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=101239 to http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=101239
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929143303/http://www.hatayportal.org/galeri/ to http://www.hatayportal.org/galeri/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:53, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified