lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Central Bucks High School West

message: Much of the discussion seems irrelevant and vanity for a few students.  Thoughts? --TeaDrinker 20:15, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just removed a section titled "Al Pitman."  It seemed to entirely about one student.  Much of the text has, to my ear at least, the same bent to it.  --TeaDrinker 22:23, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There are several sections which may need removal or serious re-write to better represent the school.  Much of the wording is not neutral point of view (see: WP:NPOV) and verification is needed for many claims.  --TeaDrinker 21:39, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the work!  I think it is much improved.  I have also gone ahead and removed the section on "Primary Digestive Collectivism," since it appears to be a non-notable club or organization.  I think that removes most of the cruft, but some re-wording and organization may still be needed. Thoughts? --TeaDrinker 00:46, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup tag

message: I removed the following sentences in order to cleanup the article. They are considered unencyclopedic without citations.
:The Central Bucks West High School choir is widely accepted as one of the best high school choir programs in the country.
:For many years Central Bucks West was regarded as one of the nation's top high school football programs.
Widely accepted by whom? Regarded by whom? Also see WP:AWW and WP:CITE. --Rkitko 09:30, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Per User talk:SnakeRunsCBWest#Talk:Central Bucks West High School, I have added the second sentence back with the citation and worded more accurately to avoid weasel words. --Rkitko (talk) 05:41, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentences removed in cleanup 

message: I like how like one guy completely cleared this page of like nay actual content, even though it’s relevant.
I would like to put some of it back. Tommyhetrick (talk) 21:28, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Void of content
Talk:Sherbrooke Hussars

message: A fine start, but that last section hurts my eyes. Please reformat that into a bulleted list, table, or something else that's easier to make sense of. LordAmeth 16:47, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WPMILHIST Assessment

message: Shouldn't this article expand to cover the claim that one of the tanks in the unit killed Michael Wittmann ? 76.66.193.224 (talk) 22:44, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michael Wittmann 

message: There is a major overlap between the Second World War content of this article and the Sherbrooke_Fusiliers_Regiment article. Wouldn't it make more sense for this article to focus on the present day Hussar unit , with summaries and links to its predecessor units, and transfer the WW II details to the Sherbrooke Fusilier article? Dan Conlin (talk) 22:47, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move Second World War Content to Sherbrooke Fusilier Article?
Talk:Toronto Scottish Regiment (Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother's Own)

message: Change of Command - CO is now L.Col Justin Neal.  Could someone with details to his awards (and proper spelling of his last name) please update? Wcudmore (talk) 15:56, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits needed. 

message: mr. Plomp, 519–802-2387 everything I own burn down on fire just trying to find some pictures matched to save a cat badger to unit bugs like to buy T-shirts unit lighter anything else with the general stores. Thank you for your time and carry-on. I learned a lot in the unit my grandfather was in World War I and two miss weren’t master, warrant officer, Dawson Dawson Colonel Parker supply tech for a couple years with master sergeant. Campbell passed away that year, 84 five. Still tell everybody about the unit every day every week and a lot there’s anything I can do give me a call. 65.95.145.250 (talk) 04:41, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures, 19,82, 83,84 and 85 how to get a hold of some
Talk:Unsuccessful attempts to amend the U.S. Constitution

message: For some time I have been working on revisions to the Bricker Amendment article.  I finally posted it and have a PR at Wikipedia:Peer review/Bricker Amendment/archive1.  I'd welcome comments.  I know all those references may seem extravagant, but I'm hoping to get it as an FA and those voters want lots of footnotes.  PedanticallySpeaking 16:28, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bricker Amendment

message: The U.S. Constitution was "adopted" by a convention of the states on September 17, 1787. The document provides that it would become established as between (among) the states so ratifying upon ratification of nine states. See Article VII. The ninth state to ratify was New Hampshire -- on June 21, 1788. The official version of the Constitution as published by the United States Government printing office lists June 21, 1788 as the date of "ratification" of the Constitution, even though other states obviously ratified it on later dates. Yours, Famspear 03:23, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ratification date
Talk:Kenny Bania

message: Okay, which is it, "BANE-yuh" or "BAN-yah"? — kwami (talk) 01:42, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronunciation 

message: I heard somewhere that the character is based on Joe Piscopo. Anyone have confirmation?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Baronvon (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspiration
Talk:Brewster Rocket

message: According to http://www.comicspage.com/brewster/brewster_brewster.html, Pamela's name is spelled "Pamela Mae Snap, not "Pamela Maysnap", and it's "Winky", not "Winkey" - can someone verify? AbsolutDan 01:13, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: This comic appears in the Chicago Tribune, a major newspaper in the U.S. (see  for readership statistics). I imagine that out of all these readers, a significant amount of people are familiar with this comic. Thus, I believe it falls under item 1 of the Importance criteria (well-known in a community), and as such the importance tag is not necessary. AbsolutDan 05:51, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance
Talk:Timucua language

message: The article points out that /f/ and /B(beta)/ may be /(bilabial f)/ and /b/ respectively, as the Spanish spoken at the time of colonization, especially regarding/f/ would have been in a transitional process. Additionally, Spanish, having the só called "5 pure vowels" may end up coloring the listener's ability to distinguish a sound like /æ/ or /œ/ or /y/ if these did not occur in his language...
Therefore, how can we be sure that there were only five vowels? Maybe there were seven, but to the Spanish ear a schwa or open o would just merge with an /a/ or /o/ respectively. Or, supposing  there were only five,  maybe they were all slightly different than the five Spanish vowels, the chronicler lacking IPA or special diacritics to denote such differences would then fall on the orthography he knew.
Whether I'm accurate in my analysis or not, I think it should be noted somehow...either they know these 5 were the vowel inventory, or, that the Franciscan monk made notes in the margin about how /o/ was similar to the /open-o/ of a gallego or the /u/ was reminiscent of the "u" (so /y/, essentially) of a Frenchman, etc.
50.144.2.5 (talk) 19:19, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can anyone be sure about only five vowels? 

message: This entire category of supposed language isolated is absolutely infested with biased edits that push the clearly false belief that these languages are isolates. This article is simply another one of those. Nestofbirdnests (talk) 01:41, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Language isolates exist. Other languages that are isolates include Basque, Sumerian, Zuni, Tiwi, etc. See for yourself. Fdom5997 (talk) 01:44, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Fdom5997 That doesn't mean all of these are isolates. Yes, those listed are infact and undeniably isolates, but the rest, oh they are cleariy hoaxes! Nestofbirdnests (talk) 01:46, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, show me a source that proves that please, and stop harassing the edits that I’ve contributed here. Just because you personally don’t like being proved wrong, doesn’t mean you can be bitter and toxic towards me. Fdom5997 (talk) 01:48, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timucua is clearly NOT an isolate !
Talk:The Blues and the Abstract Truth

message: Hm, I don't see how in any meaningful sense this album is "hard bop", unless you just use that as a blanket term for any postwar jazz.  It's light-years away from the classic hard bop sound of Horace Silver, Art Blakey, etc. (especially because of the inclusion of Dolphy and Evans, neither of them hard boppers; though Hubbard gives it some hardbop punch). -- I have condensed the lengthy listing of bar lengths and dedicatees--it's more important to give some idea of why this album is significant than to explain that "Teenie" is Nelson's sister.
I think that if you want a good discussion of the importance of this album check out this thread, especially Jim Sangrey's first post: http://www.organissimo.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=22742 -- perhaps a link to this might even be included in the Wiki article. ND 20:48, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's definitely gold in that thread. I'll add it. - mako 22:33, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:SPECTRA helmet

message: This looks like a mess of an article. I don’t often like to be negative of wiki articles, simply because I like wiki too much :), but this article needs a rethinking and rewriting.
There is no such thing as a “Spectra helmet”. It is a generic term and it makes little sense to loop all Spectra helmets, of both radical different designs, characteristic, make, model and use, into one article. It would be the same as looping all steel helmets into one article, or all cars (regardless of make or model) into one article. 
Now one could write an article about “MSA Gallet Spectra helmets for military use”, that would make sense, and also limited the number of variants one had to write about. Right now the article interspread data from no less than 3 different variants of MSA Gallet military helmets, and does not at any moment make it clear that these are vastly different helmets, in both design, specifications and characteristic, not to talk about who uses them and what they are used for.
There is also an increasing large number of civilian “Spectra helmets”. Twthmoses 20:49, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article rethinking?

message: There is not much difference between this article and the article on Combat Helmet TC "D". I propose a merger. Boreanesia 08:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In process of merging, please refrain from editing. Angelbo Talk / Contribs 07:40, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge completed Angelbo Talk / Contribs 08:04, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging with Combat Helmet TC "D"

message: I removed the so-called "paratrooper version" of the SPECTRA helmet (Image:Casque-SPECTRA-para-img 1027.jpg|Paratrooper version) as it's no SPECTRA but rather standard-issue F1 steel helmet. breversa 07:28, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Modèle 1978, I think. Thank you for the correction. Rama (talk) 12:57, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed picture 

message: "SPECTRA helmet is capable of stopping shrapnel of 1.1 g at 680 m/s (2,230 ft/s)"? At what distance?! (I have a hunch it's not 0m...)  Trekphiler (talk) 00:58, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Batman (TV series)|Bam!]]

message: I thought dyneema was from dsm and doesnt have anything to do with honeywell's spectra.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.205.71.76 (talk) 12:59, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dyneema? 

message: "Spectra helmet used by the military of Denmark stationed in Iraq" is not neutral. Danish soldiers were a military occupation force, present in the country after an invasion rather than invited by the local government, and carrying missions to maintain order, rather than leaving this to indigenous forces. "Occupation" is a neutral term, used notably about Germany after 1945; it does not imply that the occupying power is "the baddies". On the other hand, "stationed" does not reflect the reality of the presence of foreign troops in Iraq. Rama (talk) 15:08, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Stationed" in not neutral
Talk:Astra 2D

message: I think all the contents of Astra 2d should be merged with this page and redirect Astra 2d to Astra 2D. Any appreciations on it?
--TLF 20:53, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the contents of Astra 2d are about the HS-376 spacecraft type in general, not 2D itself. I've redirected and added the details of the launch. This one also doesn't use such nastiness as "Eire" in it... --Kiand 21:07, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And in the processs you've managed to lose all the information about the satellite.... 08:23, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger [[Astra 2d]] with [[Astra 2D]] 

message: I have set up this article to have its orbital elements automatically updated by User:AstRoBot, an approved bot for this purpose.  Other editors are welcome to observe the results of this change as you'll see the bot begin to update these six parms every couple of weeks, and flag anything that does not look right.  Cheers. N2e (talk) 17:01, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auto updates of orbital elements 
Talk:List of world backgammon champions

message: Should be List of World Backgammon Champions. I don't care enough to ask an admin, but I'll ask you to ask, if you care enough. InedibleHulk (talk) 09:38, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. It should be List of world backgammon champions. World, backgammon, and champion are all common nouns. It would only be capitalized if the title were "List of World Backgammon Championship winners", because only the Championship itself is a proper noun. The current title is broader than that. Skyerise (talk) 15:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper title
Talk:Bush moa

message: This article is about the species Anomalopteryx didiformis; however it is called Anomalepteryx.  I propose that we move Anomalepteryx to anomalepteryx didiformis.  Discuss awsy. speednat (talk) 23:38, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The genus is monotypic. See talk at Darwinius:  FunkMonk (talk) 00:11, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving
Talk:Nerve/Archive 1

message: I would like to know if the creator of the article had any recources, for that would prove the Propagate via sound was true.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.6.143.2 (talk) 15:15, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources?

message: I believe this interesting section needs expansion (recorded occurences, etc,) by someone more qualified than myself in the medical field. Bennyboyz3000 05:26, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving after death expansion

message: This article seems to suggest that it is sound waves, not electrical impulses which are propagating. Can anyone confirm? If so, the discussion around Anatomy/Action potential seems to now be incorrect.
Cariaso 22:42, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The sound waves explanation is likely to be a hoax. At the very least, it's pseudoscience. It's widely accepted that nerve impulses are electrical in nature, to the point where: 1) No textbooks mention the "sound wave theory", 2) Any explanation that posits sound waves as the signal medium is likely a fringe  theory held by pseudoscientists. If anyone can come up with a reference for the "sound wave theory", please do. In the meantime, I'm removing all the information about it. Fuzzform (talk) 23:09, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Propagate via sound not electricity?

message: "Nerves make up both the central and peripheral nervous system." - Not true. In the CNS, they are called tracts. Fuzzform (talk) 23:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  various 

message: Please see Talk:Peripheral nerve to discuss which should be the name of the main article: Peripheral nerve, or Nerve. Lova Falk talk 16:50, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to Peripheral nerve
Talk:Township (New Jersey)

message: Would be helpful if someone could discern the differences between the types of NJ governments in this page, or create a new page explaining the differences between the forms of government: city, borough, village, etc. --Areback 21:07, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a bad idea, but it's much easier said than done. With the addition of the six new forms of government (Walsh Act (New Jersey), 1923 Municipal Manager Law and the four variations of the Faulkner Act (New Jersey)), on top of the five traditional forms (Borough, City, Town, Township and Village) there's no end to the variation. I will try to take a stab at this, but feel free to contact me directly with any specific questions. Alansohn 21:32, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Just interested to see a very high level identification of key differences (if possible). For instance - mayor/council/manager/etc structure with each, does one apply to entities of a specific size, is one beneficial over another. Despite your very in-depth and well written wikipedia entries for the numerous types of NJ municipalities, I'm still confused as to the key differences between each. Regards. --Areback 04:14, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creating a generic local government in New Jersey article
Talk:Trans Canada Highway (EP)

message: Do you think it is really directed by this person or is it just a play on the song titles "Melissa Juice" and "Olson"? Iae 14:46, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Melissa Olson 
Talk:Kosala

message: This article states that Shravasti was the capital of Kosala from the 6th century BC to the 6th century AD. Then it proceeds to say that Kosala was defeated and absorbed by Magadha in the 4th century BC. That gives readers a gap of about 800+ years from when Magadha conquered Kosala to when the capital of Kosala was no loger at Shravasti. What happened after Kosala was absorbed by Magadha? Who ruled Kosala after the Mauryan Empire? When did the Guptas conquer Kosala, and when did they lose Kosala?
I've seen 3 different maps of India in the late 500s, and each of them show a different kingdom in this location. One shows "Kosala", another shows "Nala", and the third shows "Daksina". Which one is correct? Thomas Lessman (talk) 20:26, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Information conflicting and/or missing

message: Why is there an article about Kosala and a separate article about Kosala Kingdom.  These appear to be the same entity on a cursory reading of the two articles. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:49, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Kosala is for the historical kingdom and region. Kosala Kingdom is about the same kingdom but in the context of Hindu epic texts. Kosala Kingdom is poorly sourced and written by retired editor User:Jijithnr and IP editors. Chariotrider555 (talk) 22:04, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kosala and Kosala Kingdom??
Talk:Jeenmata

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 07:12, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 
Talk:Portative organ

message: Brilliant to see the portative organ so well covered here plenty of good info- my minor change concered the notion of them having a reservoir. Ok, sorry and the bit about keeping good tuning (I play a late 1400's reproduction portative which keeps pitch well).  Highest regard to previous contributor(s), MUSICALTIM :-)
:Thanks for that addition. I've moved it toward the top of the article and made a few minor changes. Please check them when you have a chance. And if you have a portative organ, even a reproduction, how about taking a photograph of it and adding it to this article? Tomgally 23:01, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old discussions

message: Article has the following text:
:Musician Giorgio Questa constructed a version of the portative organ with 10 ranks of pipes, 49 keys (C to C), 25 pedals controlling the lowest 25 keys and other moving mechanical parts. The organ was constructed entirely of wood, and could be assembled and disassembled with ease, with additional portability due to its storage in wooden cases.  
That's a positive organ rather than a portative organ, right? (A portative organ is one which can be carried around.) And what's so notable about a specific organ that it needs to be mentioned in a general article about the type of instrument, instead of in a future article about the musician himself? (I see that there's an article about the musician on Italian Wikipedia: :it:Giorgio Questa.) I am going to remove the section. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:37, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Giorgio Questa organ
Talk:Great Fire of 1901

message: In order to uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the requirements of the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. Unfortunately, as of November 27, 2007, this article fails to satisfy the criteria. The article currently lacks sources including one needed for a quote. Go through the article and add an inline citation for any statement that a reader may question over its verifiability. If you can find sources online, feel free to include those, although book sources are always great. Additionally, the tag for expansion also needs to be addressed. For these reasons, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you disagree with this review, you can seek an alternate opinion at Good article reassessment. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article's history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 08:19, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Delisted

message: Set against other "great fires" of the period, this one does not appear to justify such an imposing title for an event which is probably largely unheard of, certainly outside of the US. The articles for other, even greater, disasters include the name of the city involved, and I suggest the same should be done here. - Blurryman (talk) 19:10, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title should include the city name
Talk:FM104

message: Deleted some vandalism and factual errors.
TheOtherFonz 22:00, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'll tell you what, Reddysteddybrekky, if you can provide three links to articles about the Adrian Kennedy Phoneshow, to show that it meets Wikipedia's notability criteria, then I won't object to its being included.  A paragraph about a notable program is a reasonable thing to have on the article, but a paragraph about a program that can't be verified by reliable sources is unnecessary and unwise. -FisherQueen (Talk) 21:47, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fm104 also strongly believed to be involved in the sock puppetry, having performed an identical act of vandalism as Reddysteddybrekky (compare  and ). Ayla 13:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Specific show information
Talk:Peeps

message: I wish wikipedia started listing ingredients for products so people can see if they fit with their diets and life choices...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.74.160.134 (talk) 17:00, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh, look else where. Soulware2 (talk) 14:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ingredients?