Talk:Richard Fuisz

message: Select content refernces: others available from GOOGLE.
* http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6171607.html
* http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1398733/000104746907006731/a2178523zs-1a.htm
http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=%22richard+fuisz%
22%22fuisz+chair%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
http://nymag.com/nymetro/nightlife/barsclubs/features/3047/index1.html
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9D0CE7DF103EF932A25755C0A967958260&n=Top%2FReference%2FTimes%20Topics%2FSubjects%2FB%2FBlacklisting
http://www.thomsonpeterson.com/pschools/code/IDD.asp?orderLineNum=788339-1&reprjid=11&inunId=1560&typeVC=InstVC&sponsor=1
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=940CE4DD1130F93AA2575AC0A9629C8B63
http://www.wrmea.com/backissues/0794/9407045.htm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.108.247.100 (talk) 18:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Apologies if adding to wrong place ... in researching 'Susan Lindauer' - the New York Times Sunday Magazine (Aug 29 2004) -- http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/29/magazine/susan-lindauer-s-mission-to-baghdad.html --  references Fuisz many times, including:
"Citing unnamed sources, The Sunday Herald, a Scottish newspaper, reported in 2000 that Fuisz had been the C.I.A.'s most important agent in Damascus during the 80's. This is not an issue I can confirm or deny, Fuisz told The Herald. I am not allowed to speak about these issues. In fact, I can't even explain why I can't speak about these issues.  Fuisz confirmed that he saw Lindauer about once a week on avearage between 1994 and 2001 and that she would drop by to talk to him about her personal life as well as about her contacts with the Libyans and the Iraqis. He agreed to talk to me about Lindauer after requesting that his son, Joe, a lawyer, be present for our conversation."
This appears to be (a copy of) the Sunday Herald article referenced: http://911review.org/Lindauer/LindauerPanAm103-SundayHerald.txt
MichaelStraus (talk) 01:09, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: CIA Links

message: Appears to be a relative of Susan Lindauer- not sure its OK for him to re-create the Richard Fuisz page without making this relationship clear. I think his edits should be removedChitownhustler (talk) 02:03, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Richard Norton

message: I'm not sure how we can add the retraction of an article by the times when its not mentioned in the body of the wiki article. Both could be added back, but I'm not sure whether that adds anything. The UN documents listing Terex as a supplier of rocket equipment after the war (and after the investigation/retractions etc.) says it all.Chitownhustler (talk) 13:13, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of Times retraction

message: A lengthy discussion of the company belongs in the company article. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 19:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terex 

message: I have removed a long list of patents on this page several times. There seems to be no justification for having this list. No other pages have a similar list, and it seem just like some kind of self-promotion. If you feel the list should be there, please provide justification Oberono (talk) 14:35, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. "Wikipedia is not a directory of everything that exists in the world or has existed." --NeilN talk to me 18:40, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Because patents are not interesting. It's a pointless duplication of data that seems only intended to make the subject look authoritative. Steve Jobs holds many patents, but nobody wants to see them all listed on his Wikipedia page. It's also rather suspicious that a single-edit user was created just to put the patents back. Oberono (talk) 22:24, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

text: Whereas the notability of such a list is debatable, the way it was added was complete word salad. At the very least format it into a comprehensible list that a reader can understand. — Reatlas (talk) 12:33, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

text: Alright, but I would strongly advise that you first reinsert the content here on the talk page and make sure there is consensus on its usefulness before adding it to the page, per WP:BRD. Otherwise it will probably get removed again. — Reatlas (talk) 13:09, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

text: I still think a seemingly indiscriminate list of patents serves little purpose. By all means describe things he has developed, but this is just a list. Regards. Jamesx12345 19:48, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

text: Patents are a formality to protect an invention, whereas a film is a finished product. That is why I suggest adding information about products. Many thanks. Jamesx12345 20:08, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  The modified list (which I just removed) is WP:OR. This is quite obviously blatant self-promotion.  Oberono (talk) 03:40, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

text: That's not a discussion - that's a listing from a primary source.  Much like a list of rulings made by a judge in a court database. --NeilN talk to me 04:24, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long List of Patents 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Richard Fuisz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081209021804/http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0223-07.htm to http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0223-07.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: I found this during theranos wiki rabbit hole. It seems to be written by either the subject or someone paid to promote the man. editorializing, clearly biased details, and I would be happy to devote more time to fixing this "vanity article"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cooexist (talk • contribs) 08:08, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article is a mess