lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kenny Santucci

message: Poorly written -personally I don't think it is of much value but some of the other contestments have a longish article - I don't think they qualifiy for seperate articles I' d suggest merging all the bios into one liat page which discusses them -similar to Big Brother -most f the people shouldn't really have a seperate article  ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦  "Expecting you" Contribs 20:55, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bowery Savings Bank

message: Looking for some input here. Which image is more suitable for the infobox? I like the first by ajay_suresh because it isn't washed out, shows the building in full, and demonstrates good composition. It's also a more recent image and a higher resolution photograph. I'm curious if others agree. Filetime (talk) 15:34, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox image
Talk:U-turn

message: Can anyone clarify the prohibition on U-turns in Ohio? There is no source listed for that. The only regulation I can find related to this is ORC 4511.37 which says:
    4511.37 Turning in roadway prohibited - exceptions.
    (A) Except as provided in division (B) of this section, no vehicle shall be turned so as to proceed in the opposite direction upon any curve, or upon the approach to or near the crest of a grade, if the vehicle cannot be seen within five hundred feet by the driver of any other vehicle approaching from either direction.
The Ohio Responsible Driver Handbook gives these guidelines for making a U-Turn:
    To make a proper U-turn, follow these instructions:
        * Use your turn signal at least 100 feet prior to turning
        * Check traffic ahead, behind and beside you before turning
        * If there’s traffic in the area, don’t make the U-turn; instead make other turns to reverse your direction
        * Check traffic again before completing final half of turn
        * Turn into the lane closest to the center line or median
    NOTE: It is illegal to make a U-turn on a curve, near the top of a hill, if your vehicle cannot be seen within five hundred feet by the driver of another vehicle approaching from either direction or when a sign prohibiting U-turns is posted
From what I see, it would appear that U-Turns are legal in Ohio and the page should be edited to reflect this.
Not sure how to make proper links, but here they are:
ORC 4511.37 http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/4511.37
OH Responsible Driver Handbook http://www.bmv.ohio.gov/driver_license/rdh.htm#TURNING
Chrisirmo 21:09, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

message: U-turns aren't prohibited in Illinois and the citation link doesn't point to anywhere specific. I suspect it may have linked to a proposed legislation in the past that was removed from the site or something. You can find the Illinois Vehicle Code here http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs5.asp?ActID=1815&ChapterID=49 Suppafly (talk) 21:01, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illinois 

message: why is there so much about Taiwan and no dedicated section for any other country? can someone please either expand to include more countries or move the information about Taiwain to a different article (is there an article for specifically tiwanese road rules?)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.84.42.85 (talk) 05:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taiwan
Talk:Ekibastuz GRES-1

message: GRES 1 is 4000 MW
:Capacity needs to be confirmed. Some sources say that the current available capacity is approximately 2250 MW only. Beagel (talk) 11:15, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capacity 

message: Please mention the type of coal the plant run on. Thanks. Regards. Rehman(+) 11:29, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What type of coal 
Talk:Ta Nea

message: Use Ta Nea image from Turkish wp tr:Ta Nea, but confusion with "Image:Tanea.jpg" ?  99.181.148.1 (talk) 17:35, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use Ta Nea image from Turkish wp [[tr:Ta Nea]], but confusion with Image/File:Tanea.jpg?
Talk:Georgia State Route 19

message: Google Street View photos appear to show that signs were removed and the speed limit was lowered (from 30 to 25) between April 2014 and June 2016. The most recent GDOT county map is 2013. --NE2 04:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does SR 19C in Hazlehurst still exist?
Talk:Georgia State Route 21

message: The linked county map shows it still existing (but 21 Spur is north of town). The 2017-18 state map doesn't label it, but shows a black line. Google Street View (2016-17) shows no signs, even back in 2007 (?). What's going on? --NE2 00:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  confused about SR 21 Business (Springfield)
Talk:Georgia State Route 26

message: Does anyone know what the historical route for GA 26 and US 80 were through Savannah?
From a 1933 ALA green guide it seems they entered on Louisville Rd (and possibly along Old Louisville as well), made a left on West Broad Street (now Martin Luther King Jr.), a right on Liberty (at a point now called Old Liberty St), and into town with an original terminus of US 80 at Bull St I believe. The highway was later extended east to Tybee Island. The routing into town changed eventually to the present route and along Bay St into downtown. There may have also been a routing from Bay St to Augusta Ave and back to Louisville. 7.5 minute topo maps show two US 80 routes east of the city, one on the present route down Victory and Saffold Drive, and another down Bay St, President Street and Islands Expressway. - Parsa (talk) 20:36, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical Route of GA 26 and US 80

message: This page is getting too long and needs to be split up.--2600:1700:6180:6290:7184:C438:8808:19FE (talk) 01:03, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested Split
Talk:McGuinness Flint

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.allmusic.com/artist/mcguinness-flint-mn0000335884/biography. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Rick & Steve: The Happiest Gay Couple in All the World

message: The character Dana Bernstein is voiced by actor Taylor Dooley, but this page links to the wrong Taylor Dooley. It's supposed to link to Taylor M. Dooley.
Right: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2008941/
Wrong: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1731786/
Doubledragons (talk) 17:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: * WP:SOFIXIT. Otto4711 (talk) 18:42, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

text: ** Thanks, Otto4711, but it's entirely pointless when I edit a page. People always revert it and then send me a message to say that I'm vandalizing and will have me banned. That doesn't happen when I simply make a note on the discussion page. By the way, your "fix it" link is hilarious. Doubledragons (talk) 02:38, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Taylor Dooley 

message: According to the IMDB, Dana is voiced by Misti Chamkunthod while Kirsten is voiced by Adrienne Pearson. I changed the names, but if it is possible to have them verified by LOGO it would be great. there seems to be a lot confusion over these two voice-overs  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sabinal (talk • contribs) 20:37, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mystery Dana and Kirsten
Talk:Eleftheros Kosmos

message: Has Eleftheros Kosmos anything to do with Eleftherios Kosmas or vice-versa?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.134.64.194 (talk) 02:21, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Slice

message: This "article" is really a Disambiguation page (see WP:D). It should be modified as such -Superbeecat 21:23, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Doesn't seemed to be included here... Strawberry Island 00:34, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What is a Photoshop slice?

message: .
Wikidelrey (talk) 18:25, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disclosure
Talk:Northbound interface

message: This definition is incomprehensible. Is there a better one?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpiterow (talk • contribs) 18:50, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing

message: What is the origin of this term? 
Where did it originally appear and in what references is it usually found?  I know it appears in ITU docs for example, but it usually seems that the authors assume the term is already well known to all potential readers, and efforts to define it, e.g. with examples, it are not easily found by search. 
Some external links would be useful. DKEdwards 21:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Origins?

message: Am I the only one that hates this terminology?
It would make more sense if it were simply ‘North’ or ‘South’ interfaces. By calling them Northbound or Southbound, that implies direction. So, a transaction traveling across the Northbound interface is traveling up or down? To be grammatically correct, it would depend on where the transaction originated. Unfortunately, that is not how the term is used. In a diagram, there’s usually no confusion because the message flow will be drawn with an arrow. But, reading it in a sentence makes it open to misinterpretation. 218.104.123.172 (talk) 03:10, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammatically Incorrect / Confusing

message: The "Typical use" section seems to be talking about actual communication systems, while the definition talks about architecture diagrams, i.e. documentation. I know little about either, but it seems to me that the term has two disctinct meanings. FrankGevaerts (talk) 09:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Different meanings?
Talk:Righteously Outrageous Twirling Corps

message: Why may this article not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline? Hyacinth (talk) 04:09, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Zvi Heifetz

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 22:09, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Canazei

message: Some housing developer link was removed from the article as it didn't serve any purpose. 
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.203.34.134 (talk) 17:06, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed spam 

message: Dear Gryffindor: you added "Kanetschei, Kanzenei or Kanascheid" as presumed german names. Where did you get them? Ancient german maps as well as postcards always show the name as "Canazei" sometimes also written "Canazej".--Sajoch (talk) 08:23, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  German names 

message: I made some improvements to the article.
1. "Te Anter i Tobiè: on the second week-end in July". Please explain what the event is all about.
2. Does Canazei really have a frazione called Canazei?
3. Does the image that shows Hotel alla Rosa in Canazei (on the left) really show the Avisio stream?
ICE77 (talk) 03:40, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements, comment and questions
Talk:Northern Premier League Division One South

message: Start Glenn1480 21:43, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Category talk:University of Chicago alumni

message: The University of Chicago Laboratory Schools alumni are not the alumni of the University of Chicago. Those who have completed Bachelor's, Master's or PhD, or studied at the University of Chicago are considered as the alumni of the University of Chicago. I will remove "University of Chicago alumni" from "University of Chicago Laboratory Schools alumni". Ber31 (talk) 09:37, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  University of Chicago alumni vs University of Chicago Laboratory Schools alumni
Talk:Stewart Guthrie

message: I changed the number of deaths from thirteen to twelve, as was reported here on the website.   .`^) Painediss`cuss (^`.  06:52, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of deaths edit 

message: As a pre-1985 cop, Guthrie trained at Trentham, not the RNZPC.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.92.1.176 (talk) 20:39, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of RNZPC as Alma Mater
Talk:Burn Like a Candle

message: This topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. In order to demonstrate this I have added citations from two such sources. Edelmand (talk) 16:36, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion template removed
Template talk:PeruTasks

message: About the merging section, I have to say that I disagree on merging these, both articles be a huge content of information --Andersmusician VOTE 22:07, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's ok, the link is just so people take notice of the merge nomination. They can then vote in favor or against. --Victor12 22:47, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Yekusiel Yehuda Teitelbaum (II)

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 22:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: In the Biography section, it says that he married Ruchel. In The Holocaust section, it says that together with his wife and his two children Chaim Tzvi and Ruchel . Whoever is familiar with Ashkenazic customs, knows that He wouldn't have a child sharing his wife's name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.190.46.221 (talk) 15:16, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ruchel: Wife or Child? 
Talk:Jakob Ehrlich

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 05:09, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Category talk:Chicago

message: Your might be wondering about my inclusion or dis-inclusion of various subcategories and articles in the Chicago, Illinois category. My goal is to make the page user-friendly for people trying to use the category to find their way through the mass of articles and categories to what is important to a non-Chicagoan. I am imagining a person from outside Chicago, who is trying to look up something for which they have forgotten the exact name. There should not be too many sub-categories and certainly not too many articles visible. The category is not a place to advertize a business, promote an agenda, or get people to look at a page which you worked on a lot, but to aid in searching. Speciate 01:36, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure
Talk:Moshe Rynecki

message: * Much of this biographic material appears to have been copied verbatim from another site. Stepp-Wulf (talk) 02:16, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Matt Patricia

message: He is the head coach of the Detroit Lions Danthemandtm (talk) 15:55, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not yet, he isn't, according to my search.  If you have a source stating that he is, please offer it. 331dot (talk) 15:58, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Yo, I googled and got here just curious about some things and this page is incredibly unprofessional, can somebody with the power to do so move it back to a state where it was, y'know... Not defaced by some angry "fan"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.193.64.162 (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: . NedFausa (talk) 23:16, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

text: "...before being unceremoniously told to get lost." Yeah this needs to be fixed yet again. 206.71.212.253 (talk) 17:14, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  LEPRICAVARK (talk) 22:49, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unprofessional Page 

message: Can we find a better main picture for this article? His face is covered. 136.37.16.130 (talk) 18:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main picture
Talk:Walter Arnold (GC)

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 22:53, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Judy Herrera

message: We seem to have gotten into the start of an edit war. Personally, I don't see any evidence outside of wikipedia on the external links that the film was also known as Organizm. I am requesting temporary protection until this issue can be resolved. ۩ Dracion ۩  ✎ ✉ 07:43, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert War
Talk:Michael Willetts

message: Please look at other Wikipedia articles on military figures.  House style is not to use rank throughout, yes the citation sues but that is a direct quote form the London Gazette and has its own style.  Feel free to ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history if you want more input.  David Underdown (talk) 18:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of rank 
Talk:Leslie Barefoot

message: These are one and the same person. I would suggest that the resultant page be Leslie Barefoot, as this is how he is generally referred to during most of his career. Also see his grave stone: here.  Leutha (talk) 07:57, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Leutha, I agree with merge at Leslie Barefoot, see also here. Most of the text and history is at Herbert Barefoot, so I would suggest moving Herbert Barefoot → Leslie Barefoot and Leslie Barefoot → Herbert Barefoot via Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests, then doing the merge. TSventon (talk) 10:11, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

text: Leutha, I have made a request at WP:RM/TR. TSventon (talk) 10:14, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  moved, and merged. In future, perform the merge first if it is uncontroversial, thanks! (And one entry at RM/TR is sufficient, if both requested and target titles are the same.) – robertsky (talk) 13:00, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Robertsky, thank you, I will bear your advice in mind in future. TSventon (talk) 14:33, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal: The shoe should go on the other foot!
Talk:Mondo Garaj

message: theres more text on this page than there is on the page about the actual band!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.3.125.28 (talk) 13:40, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: too much text
Talk:John Tiltman

message: Having just recently watched a documentary Code-Berakers Bletchly Park's "Code-Breakers Bletchley Parks Lost Heroes" http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00l9j3g. I feel that this article doesn't currently do his code breaking abilities justice. He apparently taught himself Japanese in a matter of weeks and was regarded as Bletchly Park's top code breaker even when he was in his 40s.
Tetron76 (talk) 13:31, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Lorenz / Tunny
Talk:Vernon Watkins

message: A good article, but needs a better opening paragraph, and less headings. FruitMonkey (talk) 23:36, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lay out 

message: anything about his painting?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.33.246.154 (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Painter
Talk:Harry Hinsley

message: I heard that he decoded daily transmissions from Auschwitz to Berlin as to the deaths by natural causes and executions, yet there was never any mention of any gassings. Can anyone expound on this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.137.18.196 (talk) 21:28, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: would be expedient if someone add a notice about this fact. found it on archive & looked for some explenations here...Lila Wiese (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 11:18, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decoding Auschwitz 
Talk:Nigel de Grey

message: It is said to have been doormouse and so presumably a pun.
They were codebreakers - was he as well as small something of a 'mouse' who also sat by / looked after the door, even a figurative door providing answers?
ODNB carefully provides the reference:
"M. Smith, Station X: the codebreakers of Bletchley Park (1998)"
Eddaido (talk) 21:37, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you speculating about the "door" joke? —Tamfang (talk) 20:56, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's so embarrassing, it looks as if that was the last ever contribution to Wikipedia by Parsingphrase. Yes I am speculating but the ODNB went to such trouble for its attribution they seem to have seen it as *significant* and that's my only guess for the reason but as a man of the same ilk yourself you might be able to come up with something much more deeply insightful and codebreaking. Do you have dormice in your attic? No, I don't mean bats my old friend. I think there may have been a time when they (dormice), like rooks in a big tree by the house, might have been made very welcome. Best wishes Eddaido (talk) 06:44, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Error" in spelling of dormouse
Talk:List of people associated with Bletchley Park

message: Given that some 10,000 or so people worked at Bletchley Park, and that the Blechley Park Trust maintains a 'Roll of Honour' that is far far more comprehensive than this site, does it really perform a useful function? --TedColes (talk) 11:04, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The evidence for the fact that a person worked at Bletchley Park is easily available from the BP Trust's Roll of Honour, so what is the point of adding  to entries? If this article is to serve a useful purpose, it needs a clearer focus, even adding "notable" to the title might help, although that would doubtless give rise to disagreements. --TedColes (talk) 11:19, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant article? 

message: McVittie's entry was marked as "Citation needed".  I can certainly verify that he worked at Bletchley Park; see, for example, his obituary in the Royal Astronomical Society journal quoted in 
   http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Obits2/McVittie_RAS_Obituary.html.
I haven't cited this in a footnote in my revision of the page, simply because of the points made earlier in this Talk page, which seem very cogent.  Perhaps the best thing would be to put a link to the "Roll of Honour" web page in the last para of the "Recruitment and operation" section, and to abandon the "List" wiki page. Eebkent (talk) 11:46, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Citation needed" for George McVittie 

message: Hi, I'm currently working on User:Ethanbas/Women in Bletchley Park. Feel free to help out! Ethanbas (talk) 04:10, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women in Bletchley Park
Talk:Commission on Chicago Landmarks

message: I am tempted to remove this whole section. It is entirely unsourced  with weasel words and unsupported allegations. Most government historical commissions do have legitimate criticisms which is the only reason I have not deleted it. GcSwRhIc (talk) 14:02, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 