lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Interstate 787

message: I cant seem to get the Port of Albany redlink changed to the correct Port of Albany-Rensselaer which is the correct article. (I dont know why its a redlink, there is an article titled Port of Albany, its the port in the city of Albany, Western Australia)Camelbinky (talk) 21:47, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Port of Albany 

message: Might be a good subsection.  "Uncle Sam" Samuel Wilson's house in Troy, New York (anticipating 787 would go there; it didn't), Al-Tro Island Park, must be others.  Will try finding sources and add later. Шизомби (talk) 16:16, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There are good sources I've used to add some good info recently to Menands, New York that might be useful. For the most part in the cities of Albany and Watervliet however I-787 was built on land reclaimed from the Hudson River (or the Albany Basin).Camelbinky (talk) 21:24, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  historic sites demolished for or covered by 787 

message: Why is the Northern Terminus a separate sub-section within Route Description as opposed to just being a new paragraph with a the existing narrative about the dispute where the road ends? Content is fine, photo is fine, but the section splitting is awkward and somewhat confusing. 108.21.182.146 (talk) 17:16, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route Description- Subsections
Talk:Interstate 88 (Illinois)

message: Somehow, there should be mention of the other I88 in NY. If you don't read the tiny mention on one of the other pages, or go through the dab page, you may never know it really exists. Remember, people are idiots. Even with (west) and (east), people may not notice. Otherwise, there should be a link to a separate page or at least the information in the one article about these discontinuous numbers. Andyross (talk) 16:20, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well... the page title is Interstate 88 (west), so the only way one can end up at this article, expecting Interstate 88 (east) is if they followed a (very) broken link or came through the disambiguation page. There's even a table at the bottom of the page that points to I-88(W) and I-88(E), so I'm not seeing the opportunity for confusion. —Rob (talk) 17:28, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have taken the initiative to add "FOR" links to both pages.  This is a small change that should help anyone who is confused by this. Coopman86 (talk) 06:30, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention of the 'other' I88 
Talk:Interstate 88 (New York)

message: There's no talk about I-88's original planned routing from Albany to Portsmouth, NH.  I'll put it in later, provided I can find a reference. -- Tckma 18:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Routing 

message: Why exactly is the picture designated as "incorrect I-88 signage?" what is incorrect about it? I live in Binghamton and have seen the sign.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.74.86.127 (talk) 14:28, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect I-88 Signage? 

message: (see section above this) Should this article should be moved to "Interstate 88 (New York)" for precision and clarity? This would most likely cause the numerous other articles with the same naming convention to be moved as well (this is explained above). Listroiderbobtalkeditsmore 02:57, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you please crosspost to the other affected articles? --Rschen7754 03:01, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move RfC 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Non-compulsory support criterion

message: Moved from Talk:Non-compulsory support criterion
IMO, this article shouldn't exist, as the criterion in question entirely obscure. --Hermitage 23:44, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Instant-runoff voting fails ncsc as if a candidate is not ranked, this can harm candidates who are supported by the voter by denying supported candidates transferred votes from the unranked candidate, thereby decreasing the winning chances of those candidates. 
This doesn't make sense. Suppose you vote A>B>C and do not vote for D or E. Suppose D or E wins. There is no scenario where changing your vote to A>B>C>D would cause A, B, or C to win, since D never possesses your vote unless A, B, and C are all eliminated. KVenzke 03:52, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

text: Additionally, IRV does not satisfy the monotonicity criterion or the participation criterion, thus not supporting a candidate can increase that candidate's winning chances.
Hmm... This is only possible if you truncate out of order. For example, it is possible that changing A>B>C>D>E to A>B>C>E could cause D to win. But there is no way that changing A>B>C>D>E to A>B>C>D could cause E to win. KVenzke 03:52, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

message: I suggest that this article should (1) be moved to Later-no-help criterion and be updated accordingly or (2) be deleted. Markus Schulze 20:23, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That depends. If later-no-help differs significantly from the current text, one might as well go for outright deletion and then start again properly. I don't even understand quite why FPTP violates this criterion. -- Dissident (Talk) 22:48, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Later-no-help
Talk:Interstate 89

message: I'm going to begin forming an exit list, similar to one I saw on the Route 128 article. It's in a subpage for now, which I will remove once it is complete. --Raj Fra 17:33, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Exit List

message: I'd like to remove the "non-compliance" tag for the exit list, but I'm not sure if it's up to standard yet.  Could someone more familiar with the standards indicate what shortcomings still exist?  --Ken Gallager 18:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exit List compliance
Talk:Vernet-les-Bains

message: Does anybody know what the name Vernet les Bains means?  
I know that it is a spa village, hence 'les Bains', but what about Vernet ?
John
:Vernet is its original catalan name. You can see that in catalan article: :ca:Vernet. "Les-bains" was added later because of the spa village.--SMP 23:27, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old talk 

message: reads like a tourist brochure. Murderbike (talk) 05:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article
Talk:Asuka Langley Soryu

message: I want to express my gratitude to those who really helped to punch up Shinji, Rei and Asuka's pages. They are fantastic now. Also, do you think you guys can give Misato's page some love also? I mean, it's alright, but it does not have the deluxe treatment and I think it needs some spicing up (Especially the reception section).  --PeteStacman24 (talk) 01:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  At some point it will happen, but for my part I focus on the fan wikis and just adjust the stuff here. There is quite a lot of stuff going on on the fan communities currently. I'm guessing I'll adapt whatever we come up with for the next movie, too. Interestingly the reason the articles here were mostly the same for about 10 years seems to be because the editors involved mostly moved to EvaGeeks at the time already - I know many of them. Just this week I removed the death threats myth from the EoE and Anno pages - those got more views as all the character articles put together. Even though it was something that we had disproven years ago, it was still here. So sure while it's great that they are updated, it was mostly because the fan wikis just get about 8 times more views for Eva stuff than here so it wasn't people's focus.FelipeFritschF (talk) 02:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Yeah, Misato definitely deserves that.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 13:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Congratulations 

message: I want to talk about this topic. The table in the article says that she is Japanese, when she is 25% German, 25% Japanese, and 50% American. I admit that I am ignorant on the subject, I do not know if American can be considered an ethnic group, due of the history and diversity of blood in the American citizens.
However, I want to hear what you think. Is it better to add the 3 ethnic groups? Or just Japanese and German?
But to be honest, I am of the opinion that the paragraph ethnicity is unnecessary and should be removed from the table. Gibson Nash (talk) 22:40, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnicity
Talk:Anberlin

message: Would the Illinois anon who has been trash-talking instead of supplying sources, or anyone else who cares to, please supply a source for their upcoming release? It should be a :WP:SECONDARY source so the article isn't acting as a :WP:PRESSRELEASE and we can't be accused of violating :WP:NOTNEWS. If no reliable sources are writing about it, Wikipedia shouldn't be either. Barring such a source, we don't need to mention anything about this album until it's released because Wikipedia is not a fan site. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Why even ask for sources if you're just going to revert it anyway on some holier-than-thou vainglorious power trip?  Users like you are why people get into edit wars on Wikipedia; the kind that kind get raging boners from enforcing the rules like the Boko Haram murders schoolgirls.IndigoAK200 (talk) 20:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  If all we can write is "they said they're working on new music" it's really just new (see NOTNEWS) and :WP:NOTADVERTIZING applies as well as it's trying to promote the upcoming album. What's encyclopedic about "they're working on new music"? Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:54, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for their upcoming release 

message: I'll start by saying I can't give a source outside of what I heard myself at those 2018 shows. But at those shows, including the acoustic ones with Stephen and Christian, it was clear even before 2019 that it had gone from a one-time thing to "We're gonna play shows again." At those shows, which I attended, Stephen didn't say it was a one-time thing like they did before the shows, he said the band had "rediscovered their passion" and talked about a potential 2019 tour. Again, this all happened in 2018. I realize I can't quite source this, but I felt I needed to say it because the page saying "one-time thing in 2018 but actual reunion in 2019" isn't accurate. Rorys1989 (talk) 03:04, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  On playing in 2018 vs "reuiniting" in 2019 

message: Randy Torres was hired to be a touring rhythm guitarist in 2010 2A00:23C5:4523:DD01:A094:C415:9089:A5CF (talk) 16:49, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Randy Torres
Talk:Principle of charity

message: The original link to Darner's Code is now dead.  I provided a new, live link to it in the External Links section, replacing the original one.Isokrates 20:20, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to Darner's "Code of Conduct..."

message: Wikipedia has its own principle of charity, which seems like a notable practical extension of these ideas. Self-reference isn't very encyclopedic, but is there room in the article for a reference to the Wikipedia policy: "Assume Good Faith?" --Thomas B♘talk 06:05, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assume Good Faith 

message: It seems worth citing John Stuart Mill's position on the matter, since he was greatly influential on Enlightment-era rational ideals, and On Liberty covers this subject more in-depth that the currently cited sources. I would edit it myself but I haven't edited Wikipedia in years and am timid to just jump in again. Relevant text from On Liberty:
"...The greatest orator, save one, of antiquity, has left it on record that he always studied his adversary's case with as great, if not with still greater, intensity than even his own...He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side; if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion...Nor is it enough that he should hear the arguments of adversaries from his own teachers, presented as they state them, and accompanied by what they offer as refutations. This is not the way to do justice to the arguments, or bring them into real contact with his own mind. He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them; who defend them in earnest, and do their very utmost for them. He must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form...Their conclusion may be true, but it might be false for anything they know: they have never thrown themselves into the mental position of those who think differently from them, and considered what such persons may have to say; and consequently they do not, in any proper sense of the word, know the doctrine which they themselves profess...nor is it ever really known, but to those who have attended equally and impartially to both sides, and endeavored to see the reasons of both in the strongest light."
(A copy of the full text can be found here: https://www.utilitarianism.com/ol/two.html ) 
lunaverse (talk) 22:23, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Stuart Mill
Talk:Chicago North Shore and Milwaukee Railroad

message: The railroad is actually spelled without the comma. See ,  and  for three different public timetables published by the railroad.  I had originally named this article with a comma but found that the correct name is without the comma.  slambo 00:04, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
: I've moved the article to Chicago North Shore and Milwaukee Railroad using the correct spelling without comma.  I've created redirects from the old name as well as other variants (the railroad was known as a Railway for a time). — JonRoma 22:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: On the Template talk:CTA page, we've been discussing the CTA box and it's appearance on this page.  This page doesn't even mention the el, except to say that the CTA bought part of the track.  Is there more to the involvement with the CTA than is mentioned here that might help me understand why the CTA box should be on this page? Tedernst 19:27, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Template talk:CTA is replaced by Template talk:Chicago L Peter Horn User talk 14:15, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: CTA box

message: Guess what I found (http://www.trainsarefun.com/lirr/odds_ends.htm  http://www.trainsarefun.com/lirr/odds_ends/CNS&M-411RichmondHill041964.jpg). Yes, a Chicago-area interurban has been closer to my neck of the woods. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  06:26, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  A North Shore Line car in RICHMOND HILL, QUEENS! 

message: I am currently working on a major re-write of this article, utilizing a multitude of primary and secondary sources I have amassed over the years. I believe that the complete system map that the article has is an excellent feature, however due to its length it displaces several images when it is open/expanded. Is there any way to keep images from being displaced when the map is open, or will it always need to be closed in order for them to remain in their proper location? --CA&E460 (talk) 06:22, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images and the system map 

message: Hello again. This article is still in dire need of a re-write, so I am currently working on one that can be accessed HERE. Everything will be cited meticulously and properly. --CA&E460 (talk) 02:18, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total Overhaul (December 2017)
Talk:Interstate 190 (Illinois)

message: 
I fail to see the usage of having separate pages for this and the Kennedy Expy if I-190 is entirely concurrent with the Kennedy. And the route description on that article is better, too!
DBA78 (talk) 22:46, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with the Kennedy Expressway 

message: The Mile numbers are listed from West to East, as is the case for the majority of East-West orientated Interstates. However, when I go I Google Street View, I can just barely see the Mile markers increase going Westbound, not Eastbound. This corresponds with the exit numbers, but should the mile numbers on the list be switched for this reason. NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 02:21, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mileage
Talk:Freeride (mountain biking)

message: Suggest a disambiguation page because freeriding is really becoming a discipline in wintersports. To merely mention snowboarding in a cycling article is not enough. 
Please remember your freestyle skiers, even bound by regulation, doggers have always pushed the limits and tested the boundries. We know what it means to be free....
There is more to freeriding than mountainbiking. The term is also used in ski/wintersports as well as watersports. I suggest a boader category. - 212.41.142.242
You can look in any dictionary and find that the mountainbiking style is not the primary definition of "freeriding":
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/freeriding
--Jacknstock 03:45, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Freeriding snowsports vs cycling

message: I've put the list of riders here since they serve no useful purpose at the moment (there's no additional info - I might as well put my name) and there are no references. If the riders are notable then they should have a article of their own and then wikilinks can be provided. Slinky Puppet 18:59, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Riders

message: I've snipped a little of the content from this section and left the link to the dedicated article.  The deleted content duplicated that on the linked article.  - Shrivenzale (talk) 15:46, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Movies Section

message: interest has been expressed by an anonymous editor to have a famous freeriders section.  Does anyone know the names of any famous freeriders that could go in it? --Keithonearth (talk) 17:48, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  famous freeriders 

message: Does anyone consider this article worth upgrading to B?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Infamouse (talk • contribs) 21:55, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I consider it a Start as it "may require further reliable sources.", so no, and I have rated it as such due to my marking the references as possibly not being WP:RS. There are all primary, no secondary, and worse appear promotional/advert, obvious SPAM removed. Widefox (talk) 00:17, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgrade rating 

message: Freeride is also a form of watersports. 
It involves riding personal watercraft in the ocean surf, using the waves as "ramps" to perform tricks such as back-flips and barrel rolls.
Most often they are highly modified "stand-up" style craft.
This page should have a selection where the user can choose what type of freeride they are interested in.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.80.190.216 (talk) 23:12, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freeride- Personal watercraft 

message: I cleaned up the article a bit, and marked the obvious problems remaining. The main one being WP:N by adding WP:RS. Widefox (talk) 12:28, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serious issues
Talk:Joggling board

message: How are the ends attached to the supports. Are there blocks or pegs that keep the board from sliding off? --Gbleem 20:10, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ends attach how? 

message: Which way does it rock? Back and forth or side to side? --Gbleem 20:12, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rocking 

message: Although this may be somewhat comical, this is completely ridiculous.  I'm removing it. BigSciZot 20:46, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Smooching would ensue." 

message: The old last paragraph was nothing more than a free advertisement for a private company.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.26.219.66 (talk) 22:04, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It was a "free advertisement for a private company" because it is all pretty much taken direct from their brochure.Centerone (talk) 12:41, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement removal 

message: Currently, this article describes the origin of the Joggling board thus: According to one popular, but totally unsupported, story about joggling boards, the device was used by courting couples or graduate students. The male and female would sit at opposite ends of the board and bounce up and down. Because the board slopes in the middle, the couple would bounce toward each other and eventually meet in the middle. Sore bums, but new chums. Apart from the somewhat comical tone, this is entirely unreferenced. Does anyone have any sources to show, if not that this is actually true, that it is at least a widely told story? If not, it should be removed. Robofish (talk) 16:40, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In the absence of any sources being added, I've removed it. I also cut the 'History' section down to one line - it appeared to be copied directly from the source given, which would be a violation of copyright. Robofish (talk) 15:54, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin?
Talk:National academy

message: I don't think that we should be linking to specific academies -- it could become a bad dogfight about the list.  A separate list of wikified academies would be better.  --Rbeas 00:31, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: This section needs a thorough rewrite, as it's full of dubious statements like 'widely regarded' etc., as well as factual mistakes. I'll get started, but please feel free to muck in! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:01, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Academy standards & recognitions 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Notability (people) § Does being elected to a national academy qualify for ANYBIO criterion 1?.   talk 04:43, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[:Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Does being elected to a national academy qualify for ANYBIO criterion 1?|Wikipedia talk:Notability (people) §&nbsp;Does being elected to a national academy qualify for ANYBIO criterion 1?]]

message: "Charles, Prince of Wales, as Patron" : shouldn't it be William, Prince of Wales now? — Tonymec (talk) 15:41, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Learned Society of Wales 

message: National academies in Wikidata: < https://w.wiki/68Xp >. -- Oa01 (talk) 14:09, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikidata list
Talk:Interstate 190 (New York)

message: I know that the tolls have been removed from the section of 190 in downtown Buffalo, but are the Grand Island bridges still tolled (I'd imagine they are)? --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 22:42, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the bridges are tolled at $1.00 per direction, paid upon entering the Island.  No toll to get back to the mainland in either direction.  D. J. Cartwright (talk) 21:35, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of tolls 

message: The map makes it look like Canada doesn't exist. This should be replaced if the article moves past the GA level. --AdmrBoltz 13:00, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated.  Chinissai (talk) 18:52, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Map
Talk:Horse people

message: maybe this article should be merged, and become a section in the more comprehensive Eurasian nomads? dab (ᛏ) 10:13, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably a good idea :) --Barbatus 11:06, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: agreed, but I'm too lazy to do it just now. dab (ᛏ) 13:06, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes two of us, hee-hee. --Barbatus 14:35, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: merge

message: ... could be useful, even if you're going to merge your horsemen with other nomads. I hope. --Barbatus 02:19, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: definitely. Your bibliographical additions to chariot are also good. I hope with a little effort, we can raise the chariot article to FA quality soon. dab (ᛏ) 05:51, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Books ...