Wikipedia talk:WikiProject France/Archive 2

message: As per Wikipedia:Resolving disputes, I think perhaps it is time to open up the discussion to a larger audience (perhaps via a RfC) and for all parties to take a pause:
 -- NYArtsnWords 19:29, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree, as this is going nowhere. All I ask is that all "Angicisation" cease if it is still in progress - which it shouldn't be. I am also inclined to ask that all concerned articles be returned to their pre-Anglicisation state (especially since it was done in a hasty in haphazard way) until this problem is clarified and resolved through wider discussion. THEPROMENADER 19:52, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Working toward consensus II 

message: Battle of the Somme has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.
SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:24, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Battle of the Somme FAR

message: The contents table on the article on Napoleon III has a subsection (3.4) called "Foreign Policy", under the Foreign Policy section there are, I guess one could say, sub-subsections. The 'sub-subsections' included are "The Crimean War"(3.4.1), "East Asia"(3.4.3) and "Italy"(3.4.4). Then the following nations are listed as subsections instead of 'sub-subsections': "United States of America"(3.5), "Mexico"(3.6) and "Prussia"(3.7).
I tried to align them appropriately but I don't know how to edit the contents table.
You can find what I am talking about in the contents table at Napoleon III. Faustus Tacitus 02:43, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Bob 03:06, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Napoleon III 

message: There is a discussion on the talk page regarding moving the name of this article to one that is more consistent with other grape related articles. Since there is a regional preference between Syrah & Shiraz, any additional input would be appreciated. Please voice your comments on the Talk:Shiraz grape page. Agne 22:43, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Shiraz grape]] article name 

message: Hello. This project claims the article Bullfighting as falling under its domain, so I thought I would bring it to your attention that I have started a discussion about the article's status as a Featured Article. I would appreciate some help with it if anyone has some time. Please discuss it Talk:Bullfighting#Featured?. Thank you. --Falcorian (talk) 16:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bullfighting 

message: Battle of Alesia has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.
SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Battle of Alesia FAR

message: While trolling through random pages, I found the above-named article.  It's problematic, but not a deletion candidate.  Take a look at it.  Try to figure out why the French Wikipedia does not have an article on this guy. YechielMan 05:51, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have seen that the french Wikipedia admins have deleted the article about Yaruch Bann; it seems it was a hoax... (see fr:Wikipédia:Pages à supprimer/Yaruch Bann). — M-le-mot-dit (d) 23:09, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Yaruch Bann]]

message: Bullfighting has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. --Falcorian (talk) 01:01, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAR Bullfighting 

message: As per Wikipedia:WikiProject France/Assessment there are currently over 13000 unassessed articles. Any suggestions how we could motivate the Wikipedia:WikiProject France/Members to clear up this back log? STTW (talk) 18:06, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment of Articles 

message: Welcome, , to the WikiProject France! Please direct any questions about the project to its talk page. If you create new articles on France-related topics, please list them at our announcement page and tag their talk page with our project template .
A few features that you might find helpful:
* The project's Navigation box points to most of the pages in the project that might be of use to you.
*Most of the important discussions related to the project take place on the project's main talk page; you may find it useful to [ watchlist it].
*We've developed a number of guidelines for names, titles, and other things to standardize our articles and make interlinking easier that you may find useful. 
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or any of the more experienced members of the project, and we'll be very happy to help you. Again, welcome, and thank you for joining this project! STTW (talk) 23:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welcome to WikiProject France 

message: There is a dispute going on concerning Template:Comarques of Catalonia, where some editors wish to include areas which were historically part of Catalonia (e.g. in the Pyrénées-Orientales). Comments from editors are requested at Template talk:Comarques of Catalonia. Physchim62 (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Comment 

message: :The arbitration committee generally does not hear content disputes and is not likely to decide the question you have posed. Is there cause for arbitration based on editor behavior (such as disruptive editing, edit warring or personal attacks) related to the debate on the question at issue? Thatcher131 23:45, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment from an uninvolved user (as it happens, me) moved to Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration#Moved from Anglicisation of French administrative terms. Newyorkbrad 22:46, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clerk notes 

message: * Decline, content dispute. Kirill Lokshin 02:51, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/5/0/0)