lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Neuroevolution

message: There have been a few back/forths in this article with people changing the text to what they think it should be. I think rather than arguing about who is right or wrong, it's most beneficial to simply find reliable sources and reference them properly.
Currently, this is a very small article, but hopefully it will grow in size in the future as there is much to say on the topic. At a minimum, in my opinion, we need to introduce the concepts of: genome, chromosomes and phenotype. 'Genome' is already used in the article, 'network' is being used in place of 'phenotype' and 'chromosomes' would help to fill out people's knowledge of the subject's fundamentals. Icanhasnawlidge (talk) 13:46, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Building The Article 

message: Perhaps the See Also section should be removed as the two links in it are duplicates of links in the Examples section? Of course even better would be to link to other relevant material: perhaps other methods of NN training (gradient descent, Hebbian, SOM), and/or a link to evolutionary computation (and perhaps some of its subfields)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oliver J Coleman (talk • contribs) 23:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  See Also section 

message: The following two sentences: "However, this distinction is largely superficial: although they often develop differently in a number of important ways, many of these differences only exist for historical reasons and not because of any intrinsic requirement of either approach. Indirect encoding systems often use aspects of both approaches." are very awkwardly worded, and the first sentence even appears to contradict itself (is the distinction superficial or containing important differences?). It would be wonderful if someone with the appropriate knowledge could rewrite it. Lex.shrapnel (talk) 03:55, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awkward wording 
Talk:Julius Firmicus Maternus

message: Despite a fair amateur interest in ancient astrology over the years, I've never seen this spelling anywhere; Googling it turns up only Wikipedia and clones. (Just in case anyone's wondering, I've just refreshed my memory by consulting the 1897-1913 Teubrner edition (1968 reprint: with slight additions) on my desk....) Bill 22:09, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Fermicus"
Talk:List of free daily newspapers

message: It should be noted that I'm not the author of this article. The text had been pasted in numerous locations by User:Grumpy2006. However, lacking an article to move from, the text has been copy/pasted, and attribution lost. Apologies for that, especially since right after sorting out the misnamed categories I came across the oddly capitalised List of free Daily Newspapers, which hadn't been around long enough to turn up in Search. Ah well, que sera, sera. GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 22:13, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Władysław I Łokietek

message: : Note: Previous discussions about this monarch can be seen at Talk:Vladislas I of Poland. --108.246.205.134 
(talk) 20:14, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous Discussions

message: This individual had several different names in different books.  In preparation for a discussion about what will be the best title for the Wikipedia article, information is being collected below as to how third-party sources refer to this monarch.  If you have access to a book that is not listed below, please feel free to add to the list.  Thanks! --Elonka 17:49, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name as it appears in reference works 

message: Based on my own research in third-party works, and seeing how this monarch is referred to on other Wikipedia pages, I recommend that this article be moved to the title Wladyslaw I the Short.  Is there support for this move? --Elonka 21:47, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say absolutely not. I wouldn't give up "the Elbow-High" for all the tea in China 173.120.120.192 (talk) 18:45, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

text: , yes, this needs to move. He had a silly extra nickname, so what? We mention it but we don't use it as the title of the article. I think either Władysław I Łokietek or Władysław I Łokietek 'the Short'. --valereee (talk) 12:27, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested move 

message: Whatever may be the case in Polish, Elbow-high as an equivalent of "ell" is good etymology but bad English. The English ell is twice the length to the elbow, 45 inches, 114.3 cm.  (The length of the Polish unit should be sourced.) Septentrionalis 22:41, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I guess this should be Ell-Tall (or maybe Ell-High, if it's supposed to evoke "yea-high"). Now it sounds like the bloke was so short that his head would fit under an average guy's elbow. If the translation was by Norman Davies, this wouldn't be his only blunder (only Polish, unfortunately). 37.47.234.110 (talk) 08:35, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: The list of provinces into which Poland had been divided seems to be missing some semi-colons.  It currently appears to list six or seven provinces, not the five that the previous sentence claims (or is that number wrong?)
-Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 02:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  five provinces 

message: The title of the article suggests we will find out how high the king was. All we find is the length of an ell. Does anyone know it, or even have a good guess?
Snezzy 09:07, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  His actual height 

message: Ah, now we know where their mascot design came from. ;)  They should have had a much shorter guy in the costume, though. MaxVolume (talk) 20:01, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burger King 

message: Is there some reason why we have a very careful presentation of his titles before and after coronation - and they are exactly the same? If there is a reason for this, let's say so, otherwise it looks both pedantic and stupid.
173.120.120.192 (talk) 18:44, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal titles
Talk:Saint Roch

message: He didn't talk for 20 years. Is this true?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.203.176.219 (talk) 22:26, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: According to Millions (2004) film

message: I've removed these two bits here till we get some better edits for them Wetman 09:54, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Some edits needed

message: Rochuskirche is a church on Landstraßer Hauptstraße in Vienna and the adjacent Rochusgasse (Rochus lane) is named after it.  I assume the saint for whom this church is named is Saint Roche, but I am not sure.  Here is the German Wikipedia link: .  This should probably be added to the list of Saint Roche churches in Europe.--DerRichter (talk) 08:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rochuskirche 

message: This article is under attack. Closer adult supervision is needed. --Wetman (talk) 21:46, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bowdlerized

message: Any reason why this article is named "Roche" and not the far more recognizable "Saint Roch"?--Kotniski (talk) 20:27, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename?

message: Is Mr. St. Roche the same chap as St. Rollox?  The St. Rollox railway works page says so: "St. Rollox Locomotive Works [...] was named after the nearby parish church of St. Roche."  I arrived there in turn after looking up the amusingly-named St. Rollox Street in Hebburn, thinking that St. Rollox wasn't a saint I'd heard of before.  If it does turn out to be St. Roch(e), that'll be disappointingly mundane compared to my own theory of Rollox, the Patron Saint of Skinheads, but perhaps Rollox should then go on the page somewhere as an "also known as".  Anybody who knows about such things care to confirm? --—Vom (talk) 13:19, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  St. Rollox 

message: I'm looking to find some more information about the first illustration in the article, at the top left of the page. It looks to me like an early woodcut that's had color added to it. Can anyone identify this image? 
Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Littlelowyschaucer (talk • contribs) 19:28, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  First illustration in the article 

message: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hainhausen
The inhabitants of which not only have a church dedicated to him (and also had once a chapel too), they still parade annually to thank him for his having delivered them from the plague.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.208.160.43 (talk) 15:49, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Hainhausen (D-63110 Rodgau) To Listings? 

message: Can we please have an English gloss or imitative pronunciation guide for Arabic: روكز?
Nuttyskin (talk) 20:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Arabic: روكز'' 

message: What language is "Roch" from? What was his original name? 142.163.194.7 (talk) 14:53, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  title of article - language?
Talk:Venezuelan Summer League

message: The Minnesota Twins MLB team article claims that they have a VSL affiliate team, although they are not listed.  Do they, or are they no longer involved in Venezuelan baseball?  -- BlueCanoe 00:26, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minnesota Twins affiliate team? 
Talk:The Time Warp Trio

message: The title of the show is Time Warp Trio not The Time Warp Trio.Someone needs to change this.--Always Gotta Keep It Real, Cute 1 4 u 17:39, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Ragzouken 20:02, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Sam is  not a nerd, he is a geek. Joe's last name is not Arthur, that is his middle name. Joe's dad is an archeologist. Sam's mom is a freelance writer. The trio all live in Brooklyn. Sam always outwits Joe and Fred. Joe's sister knows more about the Book than him Think outside the box 12:01, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Facts

message: I know they refer to her as Jodie in the TV series but didn't they call her Jo in the book. I could be wong about this, but someone please verify.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paycheckgurl (talk • contribs) 02:30, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jo or Jodie? 

message: Are the chapter books all based on the TV show? They have the same names as the episodes, I noticed. If so, could mention that they're based on teleplays, the books themselves should have that info if anybody has copies of them.--207.75.35.232 (talk) 13:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Chapter Books
Talk:Philip the Apostle

message: :"Gnostic Christians appealed to the apostolic authority of Philip, ascribing a number of Gnostic texts to him, most notably the Gospel of Philip from the Nag Hammadi library."
The actual article on Gospel of Philip at Wikipedia disputes the fact that it was written by Philip, or ascribed to him. (although it doesn't mention not being ascribed to him, it states as fact that it was not)
--70.142.33.189 (talk) 09:25, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gospel of Philip 

message: Obviously legendary but, by the 12th century at least, you've got William of Malmesbury describing Philip's mission to Gaul as an undisputed fact and proposing that he may have extended his mission to Britain (On the Antiquity of the Glastonbury Church & Deeds). This was later emended to him sending on Joseph of Arimathea instead of going on himself. You don't want  emphasis on the points (they're almost certainly untrue after all), but they're worth noting. — LlywelynII 05:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Mission to Britain

message: The distinction made in our pages between the two Philips is not universally accepted. See Christopher R. Matthews, Philip: Apostle and Evangelist (Brill, 2002). Note, for example, that the author of Acts provides no more than a name (Philip) to identify the man who evangelized the Ethiopian. Srnec (talk) 17:46, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philip the Evangelist 
Talk:PowerPC 601

message: This page is a mess.  It's got a bunch of sections with no text and the table of CPU details is confusing, missing data and full of questions marks. Murphykieran 22:25, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I went ahead and removed the section headings because they were so pointless. Someone feel free to add some useful content to this article Murphykieran 22:31, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section headings
Talk:Toshinden 4

message: I haven't played this game. Who are the main characters? I'd like someone to provide a list of them on this talk page, please.
The character are divided into teams of 3.
Subaru Team
Subaru Shinjo
Naru Amoh
Rook Castle
Puella Team
Puella Marionette
Lancelot Lakeknight
Fen Barefoot
Genma Team
Genma
Miyabi
Bang Boo
Eiji Team
Eiji Shinjo
Eos
Zero
Vermilion, due to his strength, enters as a single character with no other allies.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.11.243.26 (talk) 09:31, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Characters
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels/Harry Potter task force/to do

message: Fix articles that link to List of spells in Harry Potter to point to new locations.
This appears to have been done; the only articles that link to List of Spells in Harry Potter are User Talk pages and articles for deletion.  If we're in agreement that it looks done, can we cross this one off the to-do list? Danahuff 22:26, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Monica (Christian saint)

message: When I studied St. Monica for my confirmation, my grandmother gave me a card with a summary of her life. It said that after the death of her husband, she persued St. Agustine on his travels to try to convert him and when he finally got baptised she died there and then, of happiness.
It also said that her poor treatment by her husband drove her to alcoholism, which she eventually recovered from, and is a patron saint of alcoholics.
Can anyone find any confirmation of this anywhere to add to the article? Spugmeister 13:09, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More info

message: If Monica was born at Tagaste, died at Ostia before Augustine went to Hippo, and her remains were kept in Rome, then why does this article call her 'Monica of Hippo'? Surely Augustine is called 'of Hippo' because he was bishop of that town, not because that was his family name. Iblardi (talk) 16:09, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Monica 'of Hippo'?
Talk:Matthew the Apostle

message: Who's Matthew's parent 
When did he born
Is he a Prophet 172.193.98.240 (talk) 09:38, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  English 

message: didn't  like to be touched 2600:1700:91C0:9F0:A361:75EC:3E9B:4553 (talk) 18:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  odd issues
Talk:Lusin's theorem

message: what does sup |f(x)| mean, if f takes values in an arbitrary 2nd countable topological space ?! --~~  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.47.39.14 (talk) 17:44, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: General statement wrong 

message: I am relatively novice student of Measure Theory, but I am confused by the moving of Lusin's theorem to Luzin's theorem as every reference I can find refers to "Lusin's theorem".  Could you explain the reason for moving it to "Luzin's theorem"?  Thanks.
:these are just different English spellings of the same Russian name (are there other Lusin's who worked/works in related areas?), e.g. Lusin/Luzin, Tychonoff/Tihonoff, etc. Mct mht 22:20, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I had a vague idea that Lusin-Menchoff theorem, which is requested, is just another name for this theorem. Can anyone confirm or deny this? Via strass 17:15, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lusin-Menchoff theorem

message: The hypothesis in Lusin's theorem is that the function be measurable on [a,b].  But 
the proof given assumes -- without any comment! -- that f is in L^1, and apparently does not work in the general case.  To my mind the easiest fix is to remove the proof (there is already a link to a proof available online), so I have done so.  But perhaps 
someone else will want to replace it with a complete proof.... Plclark 12:20, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The proof does not prove the full theorem

message: What is meant by "another" form of Littlewood's second principle?  What was the first 
form? Plclark 12:22, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Also

message: It seems like it should be.  Timhoooey 00:56, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is the converse true?

message: In the original Comptes Rendus paper where he proves his theorem, the author spells 
his last name as "Lusin".  Similarly, most references I have seen are to "Lusin's 
Theorem."  Might it not be better to have the official name be "Lusin's Theorem", even 
if the link is to the mathematician "Luzin"?  Plclark 16:16, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The only spelling I have ever seen is Lusin. Timhoooey 01:19, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that was unnecessary. We don't have to use the common name in every case. As is explained above, "Lusin" is what you'd expect in a French journal. This is like Tychonoff versus Tikohov, and it is antiquarian to insist on the first. Charles Matthews 21:57, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of Lusin's name

message: I may be missing something here, but to prove the theorem you need to find a compact set E, and Egorov's Theorem only provides us with a measurable set of arbitrarily small measure off of which the functions converge uniformly.  This measurable set is not necessarily open.  So I think there is a little more fiddling that needs to be done to get a compact set.Robomb162 (talk) 04:48, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Theorem not proven
Talk:California African American Museum

message: There are dead links to the museum's "website".
Njbob (talk) 12:41, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead links 
Talk:Susanna Gregory

message: This reads like an endorsement of her books and is unsourced.
What do you mean it needs to be sourced? The books are the sources. I fail to see anything in there which requires proper 'citations.'--Edchilvers 17:01, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The more citations the better.  For example, see the bio I wrote for John Dugard or Tim Bray or Sam Ruby.  Citations are your friend and use them as much as possible to improve the quality of the article.  --Deodar 00:46, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: It's known that Susanna Gregory is one half of the "Simon Beaufort" partnership (is it known who the other is?), and Simon Beaufort currently redirects here, but as yet there's nothing written here about "Beaufort"'s novels. Is anyone willing to Be Bold and add the Sir Geoffrey Mappestone books either here or on a separate Simon Beaufort page?
I've also noticed that Matthew Bartholomew doesn't lead to where I'd expected. Shouldn't there be a disambiguation page? Even if our Matt may not merit his own page (though Cadfael does!), I suspect that most people aren't going to be looking for an obscure football player... --Kay Dekker (talk) 19:43, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Simon Beaufort"
Talk:Peter Claver

message: I don't know how to do it, or I would do it, but I suggest that this article needs more biographical information, or a better link than to Catholic Online.12:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  biographical information 

message: I added Peter Claver's birth date according to this link.  It should be okay now. --Angeldeb82 (talk) 21:32, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date added 

message: as much as I love St Peter Claver, is the ferverino at the end appropriate for Wikipedia? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 21:09, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not at all. I've removed it, as well as scattered bits of unencyclopedic piety scattered throughout the article. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 23:31, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ferverino at the end
Talk:Petersen Automotive Museum

message: How can this be a "$40 million museum" when the article goes on to say, "In 2015, the museum underwent an extensive $125 million renovation"? Maybe $40 million is the cars's combined value, and $125 million, the building's? But why would anyone spend $125 million to house $40 million worth of cars? Seems like it should be more specific, in any case. – AndyFielding (talk) 05:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Financial contradiction?
Talk:James Ivory

message: Regarding queries over Ivory's relationship with Merchant as romantic life partner,
this is public knowledge, and I am copying and pasting a reply below that I wrote some time ago to another
user who queried the same thing about Merchant:
Most newspaper obituaries of Ismail Merchant did not address directly his romantic
relationship with James Ivory. A notable exception was the Los Angeles Times - one of the three major US national newspapers.
Please see this link to the obit article in the LA Times archives:
*Obituary of Ismail Merchant, LA Times, May 26 2005
Note how the first line of the article excerpt describes James Ivory as Merchant's life partner in addition to being a professional partner. The full article (I have the full article from a commercial database with restricted access) ends with the line:
"In addition to Ivory, Merchant is survived by sisters Saherbanu Kabadia, Sahida Retiwala, Ruksana Khan and Rashida Bootwala." 
i.e. Ivory is treated with greater priority in that final sentence than Merchant's 4 sisters, and the use of "survived" indicates a personal relationship.
There was some unhappiness in the LGBT community that most obituraries censored or used euphemisms for the personal relationship between Merchant and Ivory
e.g. The original Guardian obit (there were 2) used a pointed and emphatic last line "He did not marry."
Please see also this column from the Washington Post, another of the major 3 US national newspapers
addressing this unhappiness about the censorship:
*"Question Celebrity", Washington Post, June 26 2005
and this one from the LGBT newspaper, The Washington Blade:
*"News organizations ignore gay filmmaker’s sexual orientation"
see also these blog posts:
*http://thenexthurrah.typepad.com/the_next_hurrah/2005/05/ismail_merchant.html
*http://www.nicksflickpicks.com/2005/05/rip-ismail-merchant.html
Bwithh 22:33, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Romantic relationship with Merchant
Talk:TVR Timișoara

message: It reads something like this:
TVR Timisoara is one of the four regional branches of the Romanian Television Society (Societatea Române de Televiziune). On air since October 17, 1994, from a studio in Cluj, which was built in 1990 and from one in Iasi, that began broadcasting in 1991. Initial airing schedule had a weekly duration of 35 minutes, whereas in 2004 the time on air is over 1200 minutes per week. --Illythr 22:34, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ilam Park

message: Most of this estate will be in Staffs surely. (The Derby/Staffs boundary is the River Dove)
Linuxlad 22:37, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: County

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 15:03, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Talk:Margaret of Cortona

message: Her infobox needs to cleaned up. --evrik 22:40, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: Her body would be interesting to show in the article: https://mysteryu.com/incorrupt-corpses/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.91.51.235 (talk) 13:56, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Body
Talk:DSS

message: What is the DSS used on Olympus digital voice recorders? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.58.173.50 (talk • contribs) 22:58, 28 April 2006‎ (UTC)
:Digital Speech Standard – PartTimeGnome (talk | contribs) 21:27, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Olympus DSS