lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Law commission

message: I've put a NPOV warning tag on the lead paragraph, because some of the wording strikes me as problematic.  It's in the description of how terms are used in different countries:
:The first term is prevalent in the United Kingdom, the second is prevalent in the Commonwealth, and the third one is prevalent in the United States, where "reform" is too strong a term (it necessarily implies the legislature must have been incompetent or corrupt).
There are two problems with the bolded portion, to my mind.  First, the statement that the word "reform" is "too strong a term" is not supported by any authority.  The entire sentence is uncited, but to go further than simply describe the terminology and ascribe a reason for it, uncited, strikes me as non-neutral.  Second, the comment that "reform"  is problematic because "it necessarily implies the legislature must have been incompetent or corrupt" does not in fact necessarily follow.  One of the major impetuses for law reform is that society has changed in some way, and laws that may have been perfectly acceptable to society in the past now need to be reviewed and possibly reformed.  That reasonable possibility, which is mentioned in the paragraph under "Work" does not in any way imply corruption or incompetence on the part of the legislature.
My proposal is simply to delete the speculative part of the sentence, and add a "citation needed" tag:
:  "The first term is prevalent in the United Kingdom, the second is prevalent in the Commonwealth, and the third one is prevalent in the United States.[ citation needed ].  Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 05:45, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV:  Lead paragraph
Talk:Durbin–Watson statistic

message: His paper talks about the distribution of the ratio, what is its distribution? Can someone summarize it? It's a headache for me to read it.  Jackzhp (talk) 23:02, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Von Neumann's paper

message: what is the null hypothesis exactly? in both the Von Neumann case and OLS case, please. Jackzhp (talk) 23:04, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: independence vs. no correlation
Talk:Tomer Chencinski

message: Poland -- as distinct from Israel and Canada -- is not a country in which RSs say he lived, or was or is a citizen.  The connection, as explained in the NYT article, is that his parents lived there.  That is the only connection mentioned.  As I understand it, FIFA via a committee ruling judged that players must be able to demonstrate a "clear connection" to a country that they had not been born in but wished to represent, in which case the player must have at least one parent or grandparent who was born in that country, or the player must have been resident in that country for at least two years. It would appear that he could represent Poland per the NYT article under the "my parents were born there" exception. --Epeefleche (talk) 03:39, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: But you're missing the point. You've turned the lede into his possible FIFA nationalities. It's not about places he's lived, but places that could grant him citizenship. The New York Times blog is clear on which nations he qualifies for. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:57, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poland
Talk:Vilna Governorate

message: # Historical meaning of word 'russian' is orthodox confession people not ethnic
# Traditionally catholics in Lithuania was called as polish due to church propaganda. Also people choose mixed identity to differentiate from Russian Empire and peasants people which follow greek church in their masses 	
# Historical name of Belarusians is Lithuanians while modern Lithuanians is Samogitians. Newest nation name 'Belarusians' was barely known out of the czardom ideology books until the beginning of 20 century and meaning swap happened due to political reasons after occupation of Grand Duchy Of Lithuania in the end of 18 century
Due to frequent change of armies and ideology in Vilna and in Lithuania generally, the region is known for its curious phenomenon. Part of people took blurry identity which called 'tuteiszia' (Тутэйшыя) which could be translated as 'here people', 'local people'. This phenomena saved to modern days and there same-named tragicomedy theatre play was staged in 1922 by Yanka Kupala.
:Before the creation of the Republic of Lithuania in 1918 Baltic Lithuanians and Baltic Samogitians were considered two completely different ethnic groups. Even today Samogitians make up only about a quarter of Lithuanians. "Lithuanians" was sometimes a non-ethnic name encompassing Belarusians as well, but today's Lithuanians are in NO way Samogitian. Even Kaunas is in NO way in Samogitia, though you can still find Baltic-speaking people even in Belarus. --Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii (talk) 07:16, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reasons of different ethnic compositions
Talk:Thimithi

message: This article was created as part of the Wikipedia:NUS Scholars Programme project.  nadav 10:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Druglikeness

message: It doesn't seem like a good idea to me.  I was looking for Lipinski's rules, I won't have thought to look under druglikeness.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.132.104.226 (talk) 12:36, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Except if it needs to cross the blood-brain barrier. (Druglikeness is relevant, I mean, I don't know about Lipinski's rules). --Vuo 06:14, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

text: The problem of keeping them separate is that the same issues have to be discussed in both articles, and not only that; there are several "extensions to Lipinski's rules" that are essentially different druglikeness indices. --Vuo 10:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

text: I am of the opinion that there is sufficient published information on Lipinski's rule that a well rounded and well specified article can be crafted that has only minimal redundancy (for context) with the Druglikeness article.  However, the Druglikeness article is sufficiently minute that having a section devoted to Lipinski's rule that encompasses the entire current article content is not unfeasible or unreasonable.  To the matter of being able to find the information, that is solved by retaining a redirect ... that will show up both in searches and when formulating a URL.  Demerger could come at a later date when a more comprehensive set of druglikeness tests/criteria have been included in the Druglikeness article. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:25, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: ... for its historic and seminal industry changing role, but change this article's title as indicated above, so it can be expanded.  My opinion.  LeProf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.179.92.36 (talk) 04:44, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep Lipinski's Rule of 5 separate... 
Talk:City of Industry (film)

message: The plot of this film bears several resemblances to Donald E. Westlake's 1969 Parker novel The Sour Lemon Score, but is not officially an adaptation. See these multiple, reliable sources (or read the book and compare to the film):
* 
* 
* 
Putting this in talk since I have no interest in getting in an edit war with a deletionist. --The Cunctator (talk) 19:53, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Be civil. I am in no way a deletionist, learn a thing or two about someone before you call names. I am, however, a remover of non-notable fancruft, personal websites, blogs, etc. If this is your blog then, congrats! But if you can't find a notable, reliable source, then too bad: it's then just a fan theory and belongs on those fan sites, not an encyclopedia. JesseRafe (talk) 20:44, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

text: This is the second request I am making to the above user that he or she learn to be civil. If the above editor wants to remove information from other Wikipedia pages, they may do so, but that shouldn't be discussed here. The "Wikipedia:Other stuff exists" argument is generally a poor one and this is not an exception. If your agenda is to simply delete things, then that's on you and is an argument you'd have to make on your own. Don't put words in my mouth, or insinuate arguments which I've never made. JesseRafe (talk) 20:32, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe CriminalElement.com is a reliable source, and it is used so consistently on Wikipedia. It is not an insinuation to state that JesseRafe claimed CriminalElement.com is "non-notable fancruft, personal websites, blogs, etc." and a "fan site", a claim used to justify his deletion of properly sourced content. Or was that JesseRafe  putting words into JesseRafe's mouth? How uncivil. --The Cunctator (talk) 20:49, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

text: P.S. Contra JesseRafe's assertion, the "Wikipedia:Other stuff exists" argument is often a good one (as the essay there notes). --The Cunctator (talk) 20:51, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Based on the Sour Lemon Score 

message: Anyone know why Elliot Gould wasn't listed in the final credits? (He played Henry, the bookie or mafia boss or whatever that Stephen Dorff's character owed $40,000 to and offered to pay $60,000 to if Henry's crew helped kill Harvey Keitel's character.) SanJoseRobert (talk) 09:29, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncredited: Elliot Gould
Talk:Cosmos: War of the Planets

message: *There seems to be an overlap between these 2 films concerning the cast. Both have John Richardson and Yanti Somer in similiar roles.
**http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0149677/
**http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0075881/
67.41.85.127 (talk) 03:36, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similiar films/cast. 

message: The 4 films in Alfonso Brescia's 1977-78 sci-fi series are: Cosmos: War of the Planets (1977, aka Year Zero War in Space), Battle of the Stars (1978, aka Battle in Interstellar Space), War of the Robots (1978, aka Reactor), and Star Odyssey (1979, aka Seven Gold Men in Space)
70.58.53.137 (talk) 23:34, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Outside being made by Brescia, are the films related in any way? Cast? Plot? That would be useful for readers. Outside this, it seems trivial. Context for the alternative names is also useful. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:32, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Series 

message: I've attempted a quick clean up, removing the critiques and comparisons to other films in the plot, formatted the infobox and lead to match and moved other bits of information around. I have found some more information form Italian sources that should help enhance the article. Andrzejbanas (talk) 05:18, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up

message: Still, this film is wrongly interwikied, and carries the wrong Italian title. Actor Walter Maestosi appears in "Battaglie negli spazi stellari", not in "Anno zero - Guerra nello spazio", to which this article here is still connected. Si! SWamP (talk) 23:59, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong declaration 

message: Hi, Why is this in the category "public domain"? Yann (talk) 18:17, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright status
Talk:Tonie Carroll

message: Has Tonie Carroll ever played for Wigan? Londo06 13:53, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:COinS

message: For examplwe  has the COINS note saying "not in templates such as CS1". Could it be more specific? Does it include ? -DePiep (talk) 10:16, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  the COINS warning: where not to use, exactly? 

message: From information available on Wikipedia it's unclear to me what data format is expected in COinS and therefore what counts as "polluting". At Fin field-effect transistor there is a CS1 citation with . This produces  i.e. the HTML markup is preserved. Is this OK or not? Hairy Dude (talk) 22:15, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format of COinS fields 

message: @Remsense, hi! It seems to me that it should be explicitly stated that the standard is not used almost anywhere outside of Wikipedia and is not supported by official developers. You can check the official sites and guides: https://ocoins.info/, https://www.oclc.org/research/activities/openurl.html. Iniquity (talk) 17:54, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unmaintained standard
Talk:Radja Nainggolan

message: Just visited A.S. Roma's OFFICIAL website, no news on that "transfer". Maybe just another (idiotic) case of media hype. PLEASE wait until any of the concerned clubs confirm anything, then add it to article, or don't add anything, especially don't vandalize and respect other people's work!
Attentively --AL (talk) 20:51, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Aye, I'm that lazy I just updated the article to reflect the transfer and unprotected the page. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:29, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

text: What’s your name? What’s your favorite color? 96.42.81.113 (talk) 00:36, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transfer rubbish 

message: Why have the changes made to the father's background been deleted?? As he is from Batak heritage, and batak is from Java, which established due to indian influences.. i also posted a correct link with it?!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MGravey (talk • contribs) 15:48, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early life 

message: 198.84.182.143 (talk) 03:55, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.  —  IVORK Discuss 04:31, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 May 2017
Talk:Phytoplasma

message: If anyone is having TEM image of phytoplasma, it is requested to upload and include the same in this article. 
Thanks.
Amit Yadav 12:00, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) image requested

message: I've decided that the references I was placing in the table of different classes of phytoplasmas was a little to much and have removed them. If anyone feels they should actually be added leave a comment here with your reason why. Million_Moments (talk) 15:51, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxonomic references

message: ** It is always good to have reference(s) right beside the 'scientific term' or 'Scientific Name', as this is considered as best way to write scientific article. Reader will also have reference available right way, Encyclopedia is all about 'information' and 'References'.!! I read the comment (above one) later I added a reference to the table.
** I have change the article image featuring 'Coconut Lethal Yellow' to 'Sugarcane Grassy Shoot Disease'. The idea is to rotate the images available in Gallary of the aricle periodically. Concerned people may please comment on this. How much should be the period of rotation.?? I propose it for 90 days.
Amit Yadav 03:41, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added references and Article Image

message: Control did not seem very clear to me, is there any way to rephrase or emphasize on what a person should do when their plant may have this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.112.212.109 (talk) 02:25, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Control 

message: Is the generic name Phytoplasma still of Candidatus status? At least one reliable source suggests otherwise. Tom Scavo (talk) 12:40, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Candidatus status
Talk:Lee Jai-jin (musician, born 1979)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
The official English name of SechsKies member 이재진 is Lee Jaijin, not Jaejin or Jai-jin. 
Please see YG's official facebook for SechsKies (https://www.facebook.com/OfficialSECHSKIES), and the two new official teasers of SECHSKIES which state his name. 
Also, fans have emailed YG and YG has confirmed that his official English name is Lee Jaijin. According to YG, Lee Jaijin chose "Jaijin" (not Jaejin) as his official name. So fans are trying to correct the name before it is too late. It has already been 6 months since SechsKies has made a comeback. As there is another Korean singer with the same Korean name (i.e. Lee Jaejin of FT Island), please take caution and use Jaijin for the SechsKies member.
Some users insist on moving the page to "Lee Jai-jin."
If you read this document (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(Korean)#Given_name), it clearly says "If there is no personal preference, and no established English spelling, hyphenate the syllables, with only the first syllable capitalized (e.g., Hong Gil-dong)."
In case of Jaijin, there is an official English name, Lee Jaijin, announced by his agency, YG Entertainment via the official page for SECHSKIES.
People can make their own decisions in choosing how to write their names. 
Official names are particularly important for celebrities. Please respect the official English name, and use Jaijin.
I would appreciate it greatly if you could please keep an eye out for IP users, who may try to change Jaijin's name back to the wrong one (Jaejin or Jai-jin). 
Thank you!  (talk) Yelkie (talk) 11:55, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official English name of Lee Jaijin 
Talk:Bakers Arms

message: My understanding is that the boundary between the former boroughs ran a little to the west of Bakers Arms along Boundary Road E17 (hence the name). This is confirmed by this 1965 boundary map. The Post Office takes the boundary to be Lea Bridge Road, giving a number of residents the anomalous address of "Leyton E17" (the postcode for Leyton is E10, while Walthamstow is E17). I have changed the lede to say "on the boundary of Leyton and Walthamstow". Alansplodge (talk) 21:29, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leyton or Walthamstow? 
Talk:Cann Hall

message: Figures for more recent elections than 2005 anyone? Jackiespeel (talk) 11:13, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elections
Talk:FIFPRO

message: According to the FIFPro website, the United States is a full member.
However, the same website does not show Canada as a member of any kind.
Major League Soccer Players Union represents players on both USA and Canadian MLS clubs.
So, there is an obvious disconnect.
Meanwhile, the same website (as well as other Wipipedia editions) shows candidate members.
Consequently, the changes deleting them from the article were reverted.
Mikeylito (talk) 19:40, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Membership 

message: I think it would also be a good thing to have. -Boosiv (talk) 15:23, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearances by league 

message: Hey guys, I was wondering, FIFPro has been giving 2nd-5th team XIs for the past 4 years, you guys have thought of putting them on? Do you think we should do it? That means on both Honours lists and in a article for each year of FIFPro World XI. I think it would be a nice way to honor players that been on 2nd team forever and don't get that "recognition" on their honours. I wanted to ask here since I'm not sure how everyone would agree of this, but I honestly think there is only to gain doing that, with so many players not going to the 1st team because of the likes of Messi and Ronaldo but could have the other "teams" recognition.
The Sandman (talk) 02:46, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  2nd-5th teams 

message: I have a suggestion Which is that editing the logo in the infobox Because it's not arranged in this way, and I want your permission to better prepare it. Ayoub Majeed (talk) 20:24, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: FIFPRO  FIFPRO and FIFA FIFPRO World 11 — what's your opinion on this? The FIFA FIFPRO World 11 is relevant enough to deserve its own page, especially considering the fact that it makes up for the majority of the content on the current FIFPRO page. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 18:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  FIFA FIFPRO World 11 split
Category talk:Dutch people of Indonesian descent

message: Would support to merge the category 'Indonesian-Dutch People' into the category 'Indos' as the definition of the latter is much broader (In the sense that it does not confine the category to Dutch only. But includes all European ethnic groups). See the Indo (Eurasian) article header :  
Indo, Indo-European or Eurasian is a term used to describe people of mixed European and Indonesian ancestry...
    
...In contemporary Indonesia the term Indo is not confined to former inhabitants of the Dutch East Indies, but includes all people of a mixed European and Indonesian background.
Believe the broader definition would create a more comprehensive list.
 
Note: Very recently user Krator deleted an even more comprehensive list in the actual article, which had sub-divisions and even included names that were still lacking corresponding wiki articles. Not sure the reasons for deletion are valid, as it is obviously common practice to compile names by ethnicity in Wikipedia. However agree doing this by using the category functionality seems more structured.
Hope my remarks make sense. Kind regards, JAGO It's just HIS story... 02:18, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  comments from Category:Indos 

message: There must be some people not belonging to this category. Exactly how is for example Georgina Verbaan Indonesian? There was nothing about that on her page, and she doesn't look like Indonesian. Don't know how many others could be wrong, I only checked a few somehow familiar names. 82.141.127.5 (talk) 14:06, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indonesian descent?
Talk:Trevor Allan (rugby)

message: Does anyone know from what Trevor Allan's nickname of 'Tubby' is derived? He doesn't look 'Tubby'. Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 10:19, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tubby 
Talk:Lea Bridge Road

message: Has the article been rewritten already? It looks pretty fine without any feel of a bad style writing.Vincent60030 (talk) 03:34, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewriting of the article 
Talk:Maundy Thursday (film)

message: Curious... I would be interested to know why this article has a "see also" reference to pedophilia and sexual abuse.  Plot details, please?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.60.228.42 (talk) 22:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The reference was to pedophilia and sexual abuse in films; it's only a minor aspect of the plot, though, so I've removed it. PC78 (talk) 00:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of schools in Chennai

message: I would like to know the basis in which the rankings have been placed for the schools? The statement that its debatable doesnt seem to help. Could anyone please explain or provide citation? Thanks Wikiality 10:51, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am deleting the section on ranking unless someone comes with a proper source for it. Thanks Wikiality 01:51, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Schools rating

message: Tabulating the list of schools doesnt seem to be a good idea either. Just a plain listing will be enough.Wikiality 14:31, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List of schools

message: What exactly is the rationale behind the ordering of the schools, and the numbers assigned to each school?
Also, can we co-ordinate this page with the rest of the education in Chennai, India and so on?
shash (talk) 04:50, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that I think about it, this should really be a category. shash (talk) 12:56, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Order of schools
Talk:Indulekha (novel)

message: Though written possibly without spelling mistakes or grammatical errors, the write-up is low-class.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4073:380:6B5B:6CE9:5EE8:BE40:BE98 (talk) 09:27, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A better write up required.