Talk:Art Research Center

message: :Image:Wall Graphic.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Wall Graphic.jpg

message: I've made some badly needed edits to this article, such as removing unsourced, non-notable names in a long, unmanageable list, removing some other badly formatted and unnecessary information and adding a tag asking for more sources. I've tried to explain Wikipedia policy to someone seeking to re-add the list of names who claims some sort of ownership of the article. It now appears that someone else connected to the Art Research Center has reverted all my changes without explanation. I've restored my edits. Any changes should be discussed here but new editors and those connected to the ARC should be aware of Wikipedia policies and guidelines, including WP:OWN. Being connected to the ARC does not mean that this is your article. Any changes must follow Wikipedia guidelines and policy and you should discuss proposed changes to the article. I am seeking out other editors to weigh in on this matter and I will revert any improper changes to the article that violate Wiki policy. freshacconci talktalk 17:53, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  as proposed. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:20, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent changes 

message: Hi, and thanks for listing references. The way you're doing it now isn't particularly useful though. Normally the way WP references go, you make a statement or assertion somewhere in the body of the article, then list the reference(s) used to support that, by using an inline Cite. There's a handy dropdown in the edit window, under the "Bold-Italic" buttons (normally says "Templates"). You pull down to Cite Web/book/journal/etc, and it gives a form you can fill out to auto-generate the inline citation. This is preferable to dumping a long list of sources whose relevance to the article is unclear. CrowCaw 19:59, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: At least one major contributor to this article appears to have a close personal or professional connection to the topic, and thus to have a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting  (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request, or by clicking the link on the lowest yellow notice above. Requests that are not supported by independent reliable sources are unlikely to be accepted. 
Please also note that our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:10, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest