Talk:Episcopal Diocese of Massachusetts

message: :Image:Diomass Coat of Arms.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 13:40, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Diomass Coat of Arms.jpg

message: But beefing-up is needed, viz.:
-  The Wiki article on the Western Massachusetts Diocese explicitly names the parts of Massachusetts it comprises.  This one doesn't; fix.
-  Stated another way, why does an Episcopal Diocese of Massachusetts, as depicted in the illustration, bafflingly seem to comprise only half the state?  Is there a Diocese of Eastern Massachusetts we're not being told about?  Stated yet another way, wouldn't a Diocese of Massachusetts include a Diocese of Western Massachusetts?  Explain.
-  I don't call a graphic without any names a map.  Some of the regions seem to be states of the U.S.; others are not.  What are they?  Add labels.
-  For that matter, the article on the Western Massachusetts Diocese says that in 1901 it broke from the diocese treated in the present article.  At the risk of being obvious, that event seems to have altered your very identity.  Explain.
-  Wikipedia is for general readers.  What is a "suffragan" bishop?  What does it mean for an entity to be "Low Church"?  What does that adjectival phrase mean, when we haven't been told what "Low Church," the noun, means?  Granted, these terms are hyperlinked to where we can read about them, but it'd be nice to provide a phrase or two of explanation.
-  In paragraph 7, sentence 2, "its" is referent-less.  Rhetorically I read it as:  Trinity Church, Boston is a Low-Church parish of Church of the Advent, Boston.  Does not compute.  For that matter, by use of "however" in sentence 1, how is "Anglo-Catholic" an antonym, or partial antonym, of "Low Church"?  Explain, if only briefly.
-  Hyperlink "chasuble."  I don't reckon too many people in America will know what it means.  I'd say hyperlink "vestments" as well.
-  The last sentence says "the diocese" had n members.  My style of reading demands to know:  What diocese?
Etc.
Jimlue (talk) 03:18, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: A good start