lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ask price

message: stock  exchange place where person can sell there stck at there prices . the best investor is that enter at lower rates annd sell at higher rates . but he /she has to hold appience to hold the stock . that investor are called best investors  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rishi31 (talk • contribs) 17:12, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  best investor 

message: actually major problem is that maxium peope invest in stocks when they are high . people think that it goes up from that side . actually they do not see the volumes . even broking houses do not allow to show volume sto investor . once investor see the volume then he/ she do not work . they wuill wait for correction . if investor use there own brain they can better then any other person .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rishi31 (talk • contribs) 17:16, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  why people get losses 

message: My understanding of "asking price" was that it was the initial price a seller states. But the source quoted my this article says it is the lowest price a seller will take. I'm confused and can't find any other sources for this. Could it be that the meaning is different in different parts of the world or the USA? Now I guess I need to find a different way to set an initial price without using those words that people may be taking as a final price...!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.41.50.113 (talk) 18:21, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asking Price vs. Selling Price
Talk:Association for Business Communication

message: — Assignment last updated by Zhdun72 (talk) 17:34, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Business Communication in the Digital Age
Talk:Association of Licensed Automobile Manufacturers

message: REALLY Needs to be able to be searched via ALAM ?  (Dontcha thunk ?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.41.67.112 (talk) 23:27, 2 November 2013‎ (UTC)
:Just noting that a redirect from ALAM had already been made on 30 March 2013. --Colin Douglas Howell (talk) 10:02, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Bank of Africa Group

message: Я хочу получить кредит 95.46.69.9 (talk) 11:27, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Я хотел спросить 
Talk:Biflation

message: This article may be original research. Not a single reference is cited. I would remove the article immediately. I has a lot of mistakes. 
PennySeven (talk) 14:02, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe... I used to think that it was impossible for an element to be in solid, liquid and gaseous state at the same time until i learned about triple points. Not saying it's true but who knows what theoretic models economists can come up with! Akerbeltz (talk) 21:15, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

text: PennySeven, with all due respect, you're flat out wrong. Inflation and deflation can occur at different asset classes and I believe this article makes it clear. I was aware of this phenomenon but I wasn't aware someone coined a term for it. 202.40.139.164 (talk) 12:36, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  This article needs to be deleted immediately simply as evidenced by the above statement "Inflation and deflation can occur at different asset classes" which demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of the meaning of inflation and deflation. The fact that you can find 1000 hits on "biflation" with a google search does not make it an economic term.  117.47.200.120 (talk) 19:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: While I believe biflation is an interesting term, and there is evidence that it actually exists, at least from a price perspective, I could find no other reference to "Dr. F. Osborne Brown, a Senior Financial Analyst for the Phoenix Investment Group."  No Dr. Brown, and no Phoenix Investment Group that existed in 2003.  I believe that at least this part of the entry may well be fiction.  Dr. F. Osborne Brown, please stand up.
Steveproffitt (talk) 04:07, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs to be deleted. 

message: We use the term in econ classes/seminars at our institution.  The term needs to be further clarified here. 'Biflation' refers to "PRICE" inflation and deflation occurring simultaneously in different asset classes, not monetary inflation and deflation occurring simultaneously.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.107.217.5 (talk) 14:01, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is clear looking at the current major economies in Europa (and probably the USA too) that is article will have to be saved, because the situation described is happing at this very moment. You could look for example the inflation/deflation report 2012 of the Dutch Bureau for Statistics, that has a inflation and deflation in numbers split down to essential goods and non-essentials. Essentials are having quite some inflation, while housing and cars have heavy deflation Mastah (talk) 13:48, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs to be saved. 
Talk:Brand loyalty

message: This page reads like an instruction manual to marketing people in some parts.. I think the style needs to be cleaned up Nano Dan (talk) 16:42, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: We have a lot of small articles on different concepts involved in branding and I wanted to get some third opinions on which ones should and should not be merged. From my perspective most of these can be merged into Brand for definition (noun) type concepts and Brand management to describe the act, profession or different strategies/approaches/concepts to managing it. Brand Loyalty is too big of a concept and has a lot of ok content for us to lump it into the Brand or Brand Management articles, but there are several articles that relate to Brand Loyalty-related concepts. Corporate 20:32, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merges? 

message: The construction and caution sections of this article contain "weasel words" meaning the sentences and words used contain biases. I will go ahead and attempt to clean this up by rewriting elements of this section, and being more considerate of the writing style used in order to follow Wikipedia criteria. I will also add new information to both these sections in order to "beef up" the article and add credibility by including peer-reviewed sources. Lythammari (talk) 22:30, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: Hello all,
Adding more pictures with the examples might be a good idea to make this article easier to read. 
Jade71u (talk) 05:19, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures  

message: Although this article has significant issues, it also had excessive tag-bombing that made parts of the article almost unreadable, due to the presence of maintenance tags every few words. I have consolidated them into a  tag at the top of the page.
Anyone wishing to fix these problems may still refer to this diff to see which of the sentences have issues. There were many "clarification needed" and "definition needed" tags because the page did not define these terms properly, but there were also some "who?" and "non-sequitur" tags. – Epicgenius (talk) 00:30, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag bombing
Talk:Germline

message: Is it known how many generations of cells there are between a human ferzilized egg and the next generation fertilized egg? Please add! -- 92.226.101.164 (talk) 14:41, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many generations of cells? 
Talk:RenewableUK

message: Given that the association is now called RenewableUK, I propose moving the page to that.
Based on the Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(trademarks), I propose applying the guidance on CamelCase in Trademarks, to keep the capitalisation as RenewableUK, in the interests of legibility: renewableuk is hard to parse, compared to RenewableUK.
ErnestfaxTalk 13:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: move done, nem con ErnestfaxTalk 23:15, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed page move to RenewableUK
Talk:Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies

message: *The actual ideas in the book
*The critical reception of the book
*Related books, both from Collins and others
Lauchlanmack (talk) 07:08, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: There's not much discussion of:

message: This seems like a kind of dry side-note to me. Does anyone care what companies they are? It takes up a lot of space in the article and doesn't seem to add a corresponding amount of value. 
It's about as interesting as their methodology, which also isn't really covered.
Lauchlanmack (talk) 07:13, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: The 18 companies

message: Does anyone care that "Co-author Jim Collins became a "superstar" among M.B.A.'s"?
It doesn't seem like a serious assessment of the impact. How do you measure "superstar"? Why does it matter? Is it still true? 
Lauchlanmack (talk) 07:18, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Impact...

message: There is a worrying lack of criticism, or any mention of the book's reception, in this article. The references and further reading from The Halo Effect (business book) may be able to help. That book itself has a detailed discussion of problems with Built to Last. MartinPoulter (talk) 12:30, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism / The Halo Effect 
Talk:Business networking

message: This page is utter junk, does not belong in an encyclopedia, and requires a speedy delete.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.227.89.136 (talk) 17:06, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose, although I acknowledge the good faith and irritation that drove the suggestion. Explanation: Although the *current state* of this article's content may be poor, the encyclopedia should still *have an article* on this topic, which can be explored, for example, as how business networking was achieved (or happened organically) throughout varies eras in history. For example, Lloyd's of London was founded out of a coalescing of informal business networking in a London coffeehouse, and shipping news (news of shipping, i.e., vessel locations, statuses, and cargo manifests) was gotten through this grapevine before it was ever gotten via business journalism per se. Therefore, this *current content* may be bad, but the *topic* does in fact belong in an encyclopedia. As usual with Wikipedia, the only problem is that no one's built this part properly yet. But someone eventually will. Hey, maybe even you? :-) Cheers, — ¾-10 23:38, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion suggestion

message: — Assignment last updated by Epace2 (talk) 06:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Communication Capstone

message: This article seems to jump from one aspect to the next. I plan to create a more coherent structure to this article including an advantages and disadvantages list to business networking. There are some sentences in this article that felt more opinionated rather than informative so I plan to reformat those as well. Vklimusz (talk) 15:55, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Published new article with more specific sections and more reliable references. Vklimusz (talk) 00:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reformatting Suggestion and Plan
Talk:River Corrib

message: Can we refer to a river as "one of the shortest", would have thought there are countless short rivers..? Better to say something like, "despite its short length" or "isn't among the longest"... Bogger (talk) 09:22, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Short river
Talk:Business Roundtable

message: Where is there mention?  Would someone add or do I need to?
--Wikipietime (talk) 00:53, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leapfrog Hospital Group 

message: There should be a section (Further Reading or See Also) that lists links to other articles about Business Roundtables in other countries (like New Zealand), and (at a second pass) other similarly minded organisations of a different name. 202.53.35.24 (talk) 02:15, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs links to other Business Roundtables 

message: It's hard to follow, has convoluted sentences all over the place, and is often impossible to decipher without domain expertise. For such a straightforward Organization, it's a bit surprising.
2604:3D08:497E:BB00:E1D2:9EF5:F2D5:16B (talk) 03:27, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs work 

message: Being speculative, I don't think this belongs here, at least, not in its present incarnation: "Muilenburg could walk away from Boeing with $60m of severance pay, the 737 Max scandal notwithstanding."  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Roundtable#Criticism 72.229.106.60 (talk) 18:55, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Still needs work
Talk:C. West Churchman

message: Due to possible violation of copyright, see WP:Copyvio, I have removed the worksection of this article for now. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 08:39, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worksection removed 

message: User User:池下有鱼 added multiple sections of text in Chinese characters to the article.  I have removed them.  The appropriate place to use Chinese text is in the Chinese language iteration of the article, not to insert it into the English language article. Bricology (talk) 17:15, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Chinese characters
Talk:Call report

message: I think there should be some mention of the two different versions;  031 (with foreign offices) and 041 (domestic offices only). 71.92.157.89 17:40, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is an 051 version now too.--Surv1v4l1st ▌Talk|Contribs▌ 22:13, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  FFIEC 031 & 041 

message: All of the officially published documents (e.g. forms, instructions, supplemental instructions, FILs, etc.) and taxonomies issued by the regulatory agencies have both words capitalized as "Call Report".  I think this article needs to be moved back and the text properly formatted.  Before doing so, however, I thought I'd put it out there.  Thanks. --Surv1v4l1st ▌Talk|Contribs▌ 23:21, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Case
Talk:Channel conflict

message: The shopatron link looks like plain advertising: Surely, there are other companies than shopatron offering the same sort of service, and surely, manufacturers can decide not to use an external company to help them cooperate with their retailers at all. So why link to Shopatron? I therefore removed the link.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.114.10.35 (talk) 09:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Link removed
Talk:Cyclic adenosine monophosphate

message: Does anyone know what time of the day cAMP levels are highest in humans.  I've looked everywhere and I can't find a direct answer.  I know that Melatonin clears out cAMP from Osteoblasts and Melatonin is principally active at night.  However I can't tell if it's daytime cAMP being cleared out or new nighttime cAMP.
In hamsters cAMP is highest at night but hamsters are nocturnal so that might change things quite a bit.
Thanks so much for any help!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.165.134.38 (talk) 16:14, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi there,
actually the Chem-Box-sourcecode includes this section:
:...
:| DrugBank_Ref = 
:| DrugBank = DB02527
:...
But the DrugBak entry shows NO green tic?!
What's wrong with this code?
217.92.174.176 (talk) 10:28, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ChemBox info and verification tags 

message: I 105.112.117.112 (talk) 12:24, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Physic
Talk:Charles Handy

message: I question the inclusion of the Style section in this article. It appears to be an excerpt that has amused one contributor, but its applicability in illustrating Handy's style is ponderable, and only by those who already know what that style is.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.109.66.144 (talk) 17:32, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Shalom in the Home

message: yeah..these two could definitly be merged. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.57.74.154 (talk • contribs) 
*What are you talking about?. GreenJoe 16:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If I lost anything important, please re-add it back in. I'm not the best merge-er. GreenJoe 02:28, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: February 2007
Talk:Thyroid-stimulating hormone

message: When studying intro pscyh I remember a tidbit of information talking about a diurnal cycle for TSH that changed in response to sleep.  The important concept was that TSH levels starting rising in the later afternoon (for normal sleep cycles) usually around sundown, and would continue rising until onset of sleep.  This is important for blood test administered to people who have pulled an "all-nighter", since they will have an elevated TSH.  Sorry not citation I leave that to the die hard wikipedia-er.  (that's why i'm not an article editor)
We also need a graph of the TSH flux throughout a day or month (if it does change throughout a menstrual cycle)  Also any information on TSH in geriactrics would be useful as well.eximo 08:12, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Somebody please correct the "Symbol	CGB" line in the template and check all other data of the template accordingly. TSH is not a chorionic gonadotropin, this must be some kind of copy-paste mistake.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxxicum (talk • contribs) 19:45, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to OMIM: In humans, a single gene encodes a common alpha chain of 4 glycoprotein hormones: chorionic gonadotropin, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and thyroid-stimulating hormone (Fiddes and Goodman, 1981; Boothby et al., 1981).  The links were to Human chorionic gonadotropin and they should have been to Chorionic gonadotropin alpha.  This has now been corrected.  Sorry for the confusion.  Cheers.  Boghog2 (talk) 20:36, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you very much for your prompt response. --Maxxicum (talk) 21:23, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  TSH is not a chorionic gonadotropin, this must be some kind of copy-paste mistake. 

message: I think that this article should state what the old normal values for TSH were.  When the norms were first introduced and when they were changed.  
I think that before 2002 or 2003 normal TSH was 0.5 to 5.5.
I read a message in a mailing list that said that many years ago, the upper limit for TSH was 12.  I would like to know if this is true and when it was changed.
Neutrino1200 (talk) 07:28, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical TSH norms 

message: Does it say anywhere in the article what an IU of THS is? Without that information it's tough to do some useful calculations. Does anyone know and if so, can you add it?
Thanks... 157.185.95.38 (talk)mjd
2013-06-24-14:45EDT  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.185.95.38 (talk) 18:43, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  International Unit??
Talk:Churning (finance)

message: There is another practice in finance called churning, which refers to signing up for many credit cards successively for the sole purpose of collecting their signing bonuses. More info: https://www.reddit.com/r/churning/ ...Should this be a separate article? If so, how should these two be distinguished, name-wise? Steevven1 (Talk) (Contribs) (Gallery) 23:36, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Credit Card Churning
Talk:Follicle-stimulating hormone

message: How about we get a little info about the FSH receptor, the molecular biology behind it, etc?  This page is seriously lacking at this point in time.  Ill be back (In an Arnold like manner)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.93.190.42 (talk) 23:21, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: info on FSH receptor

message: - Richard Cavell (talk) 01:54, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content merged from another article 

message: The measurement section describes taking the measurements during the menstrual cycle. Obviously, this only applies to people who menstruate. Does anyone have a source they can use to add information on measuring it in everyone else? 68.142.180.84 (talk) 12:26, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Measurement

message: As a group, we are planning to complete the following edits within the next two weeks: 
1. Reword the Structures section emphasizing less technical language, as well as change lay-out to that similar to the Luteinizing Hormone Wikipedia article emphasizing reader clarity.
2. Add current sources to the Disease States section.
3. Add current sources to the Use as Therapy section. 
4. Add normal levels to the Measurements section. 
5. Reformat the final four sections together for simplicity. 
6. Expand the final section to include other future roles in therapy (if any). 
7. Add to the "effects in males" subheading. 
Wrroth97 (talk) 21:13, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Foundations II 2020 Group 9 proposed edits

message: I notice recent edits by 151.42.39.179 on Jul 26, 2021 replaced the words male and female with XY/XX individual.  I'm frankly ignorant of the scientific or wikipedia-policy basis for this change.  But it seems to me like this article about a hormone uses a medical definition of gender that is not necessarily based in the XX/XY distinction.  I don't honestly know if "XX individual" even has a clear meaning in a medical / scientific context.  Anyways I think the change is mostly bad (though not all bad, noting the organ involved seems like an improvement!) but I'm not going to impose my belief on the article because of my afore-mentioned ignorance.  Hopefully this will draw the attention of someone who knows more about medicine and/or wikipedia... cheers! 69.151.178.164 (talk) 01:15, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, "male", "female", "XX", and "XY" are all wrong, see, for example, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersex and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonadal_dysgenesis. "A person who has some ovarial tissue (not necessary an ovar)" and "a person who has some testicular tissue (not necessarily an testicle)" would be better, but on the other hand readability would be reduced. Anybody any idea how to fix that? 2A01:C23:71C2:2400:849C:37D9:F813:86AD (talk) 11:05, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  XY/XX individual change
Talk:Green America

message: I am adding references and expanding the main article ot give detail about the progrmas offeredToandanel49 (talk) 18:23, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding references and expanding article 

message: When will it be okay to remove the code saying multiple issues?Toandanel49 (talk) 19:17, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  remove code banner yet? 
Talk:Co-operative union

message: Is a cooperative union the same thing as a cooperative federation?  Both seem to be associations of many smaller cooperatives, yet there are two articles. Gobonobo T C 05:33, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In my understanding the two are synonomyous for practical purposes.  I would suggest merging cooperative into cooperative federation.  Federation is a more easily understood term leading naturally into important (but sofar neglected here) topics in cooperative economics like subsidiarity -- a concept recently identified by Klaus Fischer (Laval U., Quebec) as a major contribution of cooperatives to the theory of transaction cost economics.Brett epic 19:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Same as Cooperative Federation?
Talk:Co-operative wholesale society

message: Is it correct to describe the secondary agricultural supply cooperatives, such as the former Farmland Industries, as cooperative wholesale societies?  If so, I think I will add a couple of sentences to this article describing them.  --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 10:39, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regional agricultural cooperatives? 

message: I've replaced :File:CWS Commuter 1969 Bootiebike com.JPG, per WP:UNDUE. If/when the article's significantly expanded (in multiple respects, but including due mention of these bikes) then it could be considered for reinclusion. Right now, it's clearly inappropriate. -- Trevj (talk) 10:16, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:Competitive Engineering

message: Planguage as referred to in this article is an Internal link, but there's no corresponding definition. Planguage appears to be an invention of Gilb - and it appears you have to buy his book to learn about it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.4.114.218 (talk) 19:04, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planguage reference stub needs definition