Talk:Randy Bachman

message: Shouldn't it be honourary (not honorary), since Bachman is Canadian and the only nation (that I know of at least) that spells it "honorary" is the United States, while just about every other english nation spells it with "u"?
:There is no word spelled "honourary".  Although the root is "honor" in the U.S. and "honour" in Canada, honorary is spelled without the "u" in both places.
Strange then that Languages Canada, the language training association of Canada, has "honourary" members.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.20.8.66 (talk) 05:42, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honourary v Honorary 

message: Is it really appropriate to include an honorary degree in the initial-salad following Bachman's (or anyone's) name? Personally, I think not.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.68.134.1 (talk) 13:16, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honorary at all? 

message: Should this page make mention of his son, Tal Bachman, famed for his song "She's so High"? Vampus 10:36, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since Tal Bachman is independently notable enough to have an article of his own, I think the answer is "yes." 129.97.79.144 22:31, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tal Bachman 

message: I don't exactly have any solid proof other than a post deep within Bachman's forums (in a post by Randy's wife) that Tal got tired of Mormonism, shared his feelings on the matter, and most of the family broke off from the religion, including Randy and his wife.  Not exactly the best source of information, I know.
However, if you notice, there's no longer any mention of Mormonism on his website's biography, whereas there used to be about 6-12 months ago.
If there's no proof, then shouldn't it stay stating 
the fact that he IS a mormon, since that is the most solid proof we got.  There isn't even any references 
to where the supossed info is from.
I think that's true... it says at the top of the page that if there isn't concrete evidence + a link to send people to, then there shouldn't be any mention of it at all.  Currently, we just have speculation which isn't good enough to let us put it on the page.  It should stay here in the discusions section until there is some real evidence. 68.144.179.31 (talk) 18:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still a Mormon 

message: Does anyone know? -- Y not? 08:47, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jewish descent?

message: I just reverted 2 deletes by a new IP user of discussion of Denise. No reason was given for these deletes. Have they separated? If so, that should be put into context, rather than just deleted. Bellagio99 (talk) 18:12, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Randy/Denise 

message: I see that some people think that when something tarnishes the image of someone, it should not be on the Wikipedia page of the said person.
Only one side, only the rosy part. If that person blunders, insults a whole population, even if there is a reference to his miserable opinion, it cannot be on WikiPedia.
Hulmem, he ain't no demi-god. He just a human being that has messed up in a way so incredible that his views has to be reflected to the world. That it does not suit you is not of your choice. He publicly outrage a whole culture and it is relevant to his representation. That you removed my contrib makes you a promoter of his opinion. In the eyes of 7 million people, he has lost all "notibility".
News report on his ignorance.
--Netweezurd (talk) 02:47, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I must apologize - I had left you an explanatory remark for the revert but appear to have put it on the wrong person's talk page by mistake.  I have now placed it on your talk page. --hulmem (talk) 09:12, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Randy Bachman public blunder 

message: Here's a more recent cite but books, magazines from back in the day are better --> . https://www.thestar.com/entertainment/music/2014/03/07/randy_bachman_writes_about_split_with_burton_cummings.html .  50.111.3.17 (talk) 22:51, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: old but ongoing Bachman/Cummings feud should be addressed

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Randy Bachman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/1999/08/09/panam990809.html
*Added  tag to http://www.portagedailygraphic.com/story.php?id=173167
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090908213224/http://www.gg.ca/media/doc.asp?lang=e&DocID=5447 to http://www.gg.ca/media/doc.asp?lang=e&DocID=5447
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070502235728/http://www.icebergradio.com/randybachman to http://www.icebergradio.com/randybachman
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:18, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians, 
I am planning to add in a sentence or two about his appearance on the CBC "Stronger Together" broadcast benefit for COVID-19 earlier this year in April 2020. Since there is not an existing section for the 2020s, I'll probably have to create that too. If anyone has any objections, let me know! --EmmaReye (talk) 22:03, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding in COVID "Stronger Together" appearance on CBC 

message: This page may need to be protected somewhat, as a user has been repeated adding in libelous edits, i.e. that Randy Bachman raped his daughter, is the leader of a child pornography ring, etc. I don't know why this is happening, nor do I truly care, but either way none of these edits have been cited, nor have I found any sources for the claims; my best guess is that this is some personal thing and/or conspiracy, either way, it does not have any place on Wikipedia, especially not on a biography of a living person
Blipslisle (talk) 21:25, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repeated Vandalism