lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Galliformes

message: ITIS has this order quite mixed up. There's a suborder Galli, but Gallus isn't in it; there's a family Meleagrididae, but Meleagris isn't in it; and there's no Gallidae even though Gallus is the type species (Gallus and Meleagris are both in Phasianidae). Can someone sort this out? -phma
:There is a new paper upcoming (in Cladistics journal) which should provide most of the information to sort it out. Generally, relying on ITIS is not such a good idea as currently we're witnessing a major revolution in bird taxonomy as morphological, behavioral, fossil and molecular data are being combined; primary literature (i.e. peer-reviewed papers) are to be preferred always. Dysmorodrepanis 16:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Chicken might be Gallus domesticus (it is generally G. g. domesticus) as some other domestic taxa are now treated as human-made species taxonomically. For the purpose of the article, Gallus gallus is the way to go though (there are some wild subspecies which the article also would be the place to deal with). Dysmorodrepanis 16:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Well thats the least I could do; this is probably one of the very last major bird articles that needs major work. Sources are there aplenty (see article source); I'm not doing it now but I'll do it soon and I guess it's gonna be done by midyear. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 20:59, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expert/Dispute

message: There'e been no action on the merger, so I will try. Wxidea (talk) 02:35, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged
Talk:Cabbage

message: Our article says that 100 g of cabbage gives 25 kcal, and contains 3.2 g sugars, 2.5 g "dietary fiber", 0.1 g fat, and 1.28 g protein. But how does that give 25 kcal? Using the standard 4 Cal/g for carbohydrates and proteein and 9 for fat, we get only 19 Cal. The "fiber" doesn't count. If we include the "fiber" as carbohydrate, we get 29 Calories. Eric Kvaalen (talk) 12:46, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't calculate the values in the nutrition table but rather list them from the USDA database, here, where the energy level of 25 kcal is given. Zefr (talk) 15:09, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Energy content

message: I assume that the intention was to depict white cabbage but the depiction is of a savoy. This may be confusing when "cabbage" per-se refers to white cabbage 2a02:908:1657:a860:1049:34bb:c886:3c07 (talk) 15:20, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cabbage vs Savoy 

message: overcooked cabbage does NOT emit hydrogen sulfide.  the linked article mentions NOTHING about cabbage at all, or hydrogen sulfide.  pls remove.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8001:6B00:E6:0:0:0:8F8 (talk) 01:25, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hydrogen Sulfide?! 

message: Could there be a section about cabbage in culture? One example is the Liz Truss cabbage. 129.194.91.158 (talk) 11:16, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the article  is about culture, and it was the Liz Truss lettuce! Graham Beards (talk) 16:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cabbage in culture
Talk:Welsh literature in English

message: I wonder if the following statement is true: "Welsh writers in English have traditionally favoured the short story form over the novel"? Perhaps it should read: "Welsh writers in English favoured the short story form over the novel until after [World War II?]"? Rwood128 (talk) 16:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The discussion of this is only in the lede and it lacks evidence. Rwood128 (talk) 16:09, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: On further thought the The New Companion to the Literature of Wales is the probable source of the discussion in the lede. However I still think the wording needs revising. Rwood128 (talk) 16:18, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have revised the lede but who are the writers referred to? and when did the novel become more important? This needs to be considered in the body to the article. Rwood128 (talk) 16:36, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

text: @Rwood128 why no mention anywhere of the English Language Section of AG, and it's considerable achievements.? 109.144.27.37 (talk) 14:54, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: 109.144.27.37, please fix. Rwood128 (talk) 17:00, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short story? 

message: Furthermore the discussion of the novel lacks focus. There needs to be separate discussions of poetry, drama and the novel for each period. Rwood128 (talk) 16:50, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: @Rwood128 why no mention anywhere of the English Language Section of AG, and it's considerable achievements.? 109.144.27.37 (talk) 14:54, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: 109.144.27.37, please fix. Rwood128 (talk) 17:00, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Novel

message: This seems to be overburdened with unnecessary detail. And surely the inclusion a pic of Handel is stretching the limits of relevance! 84.92.52.232 (talk) 19:44, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks,User 84.92.52.232. Try and fix and improve the article. I agree about Handel, and will remove it, if you don't first.Rwood128 (talk) 20:37, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical background
Talk:Characteristic subgroup

message: I have to argue, the center of the group is not always fully characteristic, there is a group with order 16 as counterexample.
:Ooops! Quite right; in fact, let G be the direct product of C2 and any generalized dihedral group Dih(H), then G forms a counterexample. If we let f:G → G be the endomorphism f(h) = 1 for all h in H, f(g) = g for g not in H, then f(G) is onto the subgroup generated by C2 and an element of order 2 in Dih(H); this is isomorphic to V4, so we can apply an automorphism T swapping elements of order 2. Then Tf(Z(G)) is not a subgroup of Z(G).
:It is true that the center of a group is strictly characteristic. Chas zzz brown 20:49 Nov 5, 2002 (UTC)
::Is strictly characteristic the usual term? I've never seen this term before, but I have seen such subgroups referred to as distinguished subgroups, e.g., in Combinatorial Group Theory (Magnus, Karrass & Solitar). --Zundark 09:07, 7 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been over two years since I asked this, and still nobody has provided a reference for "strictly characteristic", so I'm changing it to "distinguished". --Zundark 09:34, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

message: Section 2 ended with
:"Normality" is not transitive but Characteristic is transitive.So when transitivity will hold for Normal Subgroups?? If H Char K and K normal in G then H normal in G.
I removed the fragmentary question because it did not seem to impart any information.–Dan Hoeytalk 16:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentence fragment removed
Talk:M16 rifle

message: Regarding the Design > Magazine section on the "Enhanced Performance Magazine" its stated "to distinguish it from earlier, incompatible magazines."  The item is a magazine, it is not compatible with another magazine.  Earlier magazines are not incompatible with the rifle.  The compatibility is not the distinguisher, the idea we want to get across is that they are tan with a blue follower to not their improved performance over earlier models of magazine.  It makes much more sense in my opinion to reword the statement to "to distinguish it from earlier models of magazine" or "earlier design of magazine" 72.39.35.188 (talk) 21:13, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops, wasn't logged in, this is my topic Wozrop (talk) 21:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magazine Section and compatibility 

message: The article chapter 'History' contains two sub-chapters (Background and Adoption) both of which are quite verbose.
'Adoption' is simply a repeat of'Background'.
Major edit-rewrite required. Felimy (talk) 08:40, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repetition
Talk:In Bed with Medinner

message: : could someone give dates for when this ran? or a decade? -- Tarquin
:*seems to have been done now. --bodnotbod » .....TALKQuietly)</span> 21:48, Oct 2, 2004 (UTC)
:*I've updated the Wiki Entry with the TX Dates for everything. --RedboXen 14:10, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Broadcast schedule

message: According to the BBC Comedy Guide, there were 3 series and two specials, Series 3 was 11 parts and ran 6 Feb-24 Apr 1998.
However LWTs archive refer to the first two specials as "series 1", and they have series 4 down as being 12 parts and running 10 Jan-25th Apr 1999.
As its more likely LWT know what they are talking about I've used their naming system for series and dates for series 4.
Unless anyone knows better?  --RedboXen 21:32, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Series/Dates 

message: The link that was recently added is marked as a "fansite" where actually its a site that seemingly exists mostly to sell episodes of the show, with the bulk of its content copied from Wikipedia.  Is this in violation of the rules?  Should Wikipedia be promoting people selling episodes of TV shows.  --RedboXen 21:37, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fansite" 

message: The YouTube link I put up here has had a couple of reverts recently. The reason given for the initial revmoval is understandable- I have not provided evidence of ownership of the copyright of these clips (which I do not have- although I have the support of Bob Mills to host them). Wiki seems clear on this, so could I request that the link isn't added again? If anyone wants to find the clips then YouTube has a search facility which will help internet users to locate them.--The globetrotter 12:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube Link 

message: I think I should question the recent capitalisation of 'Medinner' as 'MeDinner'. If you check the credits of all four series, the capitalisation is merely stylised- with all of the letters in capitals, and a difference in height rather than capital/non-capital letters. Obviously the nature of the invented word 'Medinner' is virtually portmanteau, but Bob Mills writes it as 'Medinner' and
as he came up with the title, I guess he has the only real perspective on this very minor but annoying issue! The globetrotter 09:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalisation
Talk:Francis Poulenc

message: Hi, this article is scheduled to be a featured article on 7 January 2017, but the review was closed on 4 December 2014, three years earlier. What was the cause for the delay? Does it really take this long for FACs to get onto the main page? Thanks, Icebob99 (talk) 18:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Only one featured article can run per day, so if there are 5,000 featured articles it takes 5,000 days to run them all -- and of course more are being written all the time.  It used to be the case that featured articles were being created faster than one per day, so we were falling behind, but nowadays we only add about 18-20 per month.  If that continues, eventually every article that is still FA-quality will run on the main page, and we'll have to start re-running articles. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 19:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about FAC review 

message: Hi, this article doesn't seem to mention Brigitte Manceaux, his niece, one of the most important figures in Poulenc's life. Why is this? I'm personally perplexed and very much surprised...
MarcelDuprè1886 (talk) 14:48, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Brigitte Manceaux is not mentioned at all in the 8,000-word Grove article on Poulenc and she is mentioned only once in Ivry's biography. In Nichols's biography she is mentioned several times, but mostly as recipient of a quoted letter from FP. If you think his article needs mention of her perhaps you'd like to draft a few words for consideration here. I'm sure colleagues will look favourably on a proportionate sentence or two if there is a case for them. Tim riley talk 19:38, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issue
Talk:Fourier series

message: is broken.
WikiLink Fourier series in article Discrete-time_Fourier_transform is broken.
Bob K (talk) 19:21, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  broken links 

message: I am restoring basically the 15-Feb version with some improvements.  The recent edits warrant discussion and hopefully a consensus. Bob K (talk) 16:07, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I undid the undo.  There are two problems I have with the Feb 15th version.  First, it incorrectly defines the Fourier series, instead giving formulas for the partial sum.  This is (IMO) a serious issue, because there is a lot to talk about in terms of which partial sums you should take and why, which cannot be discussed if you define the series immediately to be the partial sum.  The second issue is that very early on in the article into a discussion of the cross correlation function, which was causing some confusion, so I tried to move it. Finally, the revert undid other peoples edits that had nothing to do with the change I introduced, which are presumably the objectionable ones.  I will read through it again and try to fix any errors or inconsistencies I see, but I do think this is a better starting point. Thenub314 (talk) 17:22, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  recent edits introduce numerous errors and inconsistencies 

message: This sentence doesn't make any sense as-is. Unfortunately I don't really understand what it could mean. I am going to remove it for the moment. pglpm (talk) 10:00, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I must of clobbered that sentence trying to edit it, thanks Thenub314 (talk) 13:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "This is a property that similarly have this property"? 

message: It seems to me that the Hilbert space being considered must be L^2(-\pi,\pi), since otherwise we need f(-\pi) = f(\pi) by periodicity. jajaperson (talk) 05:25, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in Hilbert space section? 

message: The redirect Hilbert Spaces and Fourier analysis has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  1234qwer1234qwer4 01:32, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Hilbert Spaces and Fourier analysis]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:King Arthur

message: I believe that during the Dark Ages there was a King Arthur. It’s just that the Dark Ages are pretty much lost to history except a record that states a man named Arthur was a great warrior thus showing he was real just during a time where history draws a blank. 75.97.52.227 (talk) 03:41, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi ip. Is this a question or a statement? Regards, Thinker78 (talk) 06:26, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: When the Romans left Britain people were illiterate for several hundred years.  There's no written history from this time frame.  24.51.192.49 (talk) 00:35, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The Dark Ages never really existed. The Ecclesiastical History of the English People (731) is our oldest detailed source on Anglo-Saxon history, and the De Excidio et Conquestu Britanniae (c. 530s) gives at least a biased Christian look of political life in Sub-Roman Britain. There is no real indication of a loss of literacy, and nearby Ireland was producing Hiberno-Latin texts by the 6th century. Dimadick (talk) 06:15, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, and none of these sources mention Arthur.--Jack Upland (talk) 04:01, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  King Arthur Real? 

message: His finished and unfinished works are important, but Chrétien de Troyes did not begin any genre. Readily available books  on the subject, such as those available at other Wikipedia sites (e.g. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/From_Ritual_to_Romance) provide ample evidence of weakness of this paragraph. Trewin (talk) 06:47, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: From Ritual to Romance is very dated. It is not a WP:RS. Dudley Miles (talk) 08:22, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance of Chrétien de Troyes 

message: 1. In 516 A.D. King Arthur was coronated as King in England, and this event was attended by all the archbishops, bishops and abbots of the country. In addition to this event, there was a Catholic Church Council:  St Dubritius resigned his archiepiscopal seat of Caer-leon to David in order to lead a hermit's life.
Reference: Church Councils A to N, A manual of councils of the Holy Catholic Church : Landon, Edward H. (Edward Henry), -1877 : www.archive.org, (How to find the reference, turn to page 250, Look for England, 516 A.D.
:The source is unclear and obviously unreliable. Dudley Miles (talk) 08:50, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:   One citation for evidence of King Arthur as a real person, and a reference to legend. 

message: "Morris's" is incorrect; simply delete the second s. I have already ctrl+f checked the page and the only instance of this error is under "historicity", several paragraphs down. 2A02:C7F:662E:5000:8D2:23BF:C2C7:205C (talk) 03:26, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: My reading of MOS:POSS is that Morris's is correct.  RudolfRed (talk) 03:44, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 December 2023 

message: Shouldn't the kingdom of Wessex be mentioned in this article, at least briefly? 76.190.213.189 (talk) 02:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wessex]]
Talk:Bourgeois liberalization

message: As it stands now the article makes it seem that the Chinese government invented this term out of thin air in the 1980's.  There is no mention of Marx.  To me this looks misleading and deceptive.  Should it be erased? 58.247.251.81 (talk) 02:32, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is misleading
Talk:Alfred P. Sloan

message: The section doesn't discuss Sloan at all, aside from an economic prediction of his. It then cites the same two sources three times in a row. It also doesn't appear to be factually correct, as the US did enter a recession in 1945, plus more in 1949, 1953, and 1958 (see List_of_recessions_in_the_United_States#Great_Depression_onward). While there was an era of post-War prosperity, there were ups and downs. Moreover, this section currently seems designed to belittle "New Dealers" and Keynesian economists (when the era of prosperity was presided over by a Keynesian consensus until the 1970s) rather than discuss Sloan's life.Tulesounds (talk) 21:21, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it is too positive, not a balanced picture of the company that could not deal with Japanese competition by the 1970s, stuck in in Sloan’s rut. - - Prairieplant (talk) 13:04, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Post War section appears biased
Talk:Bhopal disaster

message: Someone should cleanup the references here. Many of the works cited are in the Further reading section, and referred to with Harvard citations in the footnotes. At a minimum, these citations should be wrapped in a  template. Tito Omburo (talk) 00:03, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference cleanup 

message: Higher Concentrations of heavy metals in groundwater has been reported in several locations close to the defunct factory of  Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) ,39 years after Bhopal Gas Tragedy. The Central Ground Water Authority has submitted the report to the National Green Tribunal.From 1969 to 1984 hundreds of tonnes of toxic waste was dumped in their factory premises. The manganese waste is more than the permissible limit of 0.3 /mg/L. 8.33% of the locations(three out of 36) which were associated with deeper aquifers, recorded manganese concentration. Notably, BIS does not regulate Strontium concentrations. The report mentioned that strontium concentrations ranged from 0.198 to 2.223 mg/Lwith an average of 0.833mg/L. The water samples were taken from 5 km radius of UCIL factory which included residential area. (Ref The Hindu 17 July 2024)  Sujasi Sujasi (talk) 12:23, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heavy Metals found near Bhopal Gas Tragedy Site
Talk:EDonkey2000

message: Seeing that aMule has become quite popular, shouldn't a link be added too—°==
The whole Edonkey / Overnet-thing is confusing. The article states "eDonkey2000 client is not "eDonkey" any more. It supports only Overnet Network by default" ...
only to later specify that 
" In 2004, MetaMachines announced it would stop the development of Overnet to concentrate on eDonkey2000"
This seems a little contradictory. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.167.105.201 (talk) 05:47, 16 May 2005
I thought Overnet was a program itself...Amren (talk) 23:58, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Amule

message: The Digital Archive Project still uses the eDonkey 2000 application. Does anyone think it should be mentioned in the article? Calmsavior 20:10, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you should add that to a page about DAP. :Leuk he 06:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DAP

message: This is a low quality article.  As with many other low quality articles the original authors made many temporal references such as "current" and "latest" which inevitably results in problems later because sooner or later those words will not make sense.  In this case the product is no longer has been discontinued.  I would encourage those who agree to mark this article as being in need of a rewrite to bring it up to better quality standards.  -- Horkana 23:17, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Low Quality Article
Talk:List of tourist attractions in Sardinia

message: To be truly functional, this list could do with some content about the various places. --Bejnar (talk) 20:45, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Content
Talk:His Master's Voice

message: I am moving the following uncited material here until it can be properly supported with inline citations of reliable, secondary sources, per WP:V, WP:CS, WP:IRS, WP:PSTS, WP:BLP, WP:NOR, et al. This diff shows where it was in the article. Nightscream (talk) 14:04, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncited material in need of citations
Talk:Grook

message: The characteristic irony, paradox, and the duality of quantum logic of the poems is the only distinguishing form.
Erm, is this sentence supposed to mean something? The "duality of the quantum logic"...!?
----
Question: The translation of  "GRin & sUK" in the Wikipedia article says "cry and moan", but I've also run across "laughter and sigh" for the translation. Is either one a better definition?
Also: I removed the "the duality of quantum logic of the poems" from the description. A couldn't find anything on his own website  or elsewhere that used that to qualify the characteristics of a Grook. gK ¿? 09:25, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: The poem mentions a "devil on crack", yet the author's article says he wrote these until 1963.  It's either a hoax or a fortuitous coincidence, because there was no crack cocaine in 1963! Could someone knowledgeable about poetry have a look? Wnt (talk) 18:14, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the examples, as they were both dubious, and uncited, and copyright violations (i think? not sure how many examples/lines of poetry we're allowed to quote...). -- Quiddity (talk) 21:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It was added as far back as 2002 and it was obviously not by Piet Hein. Nicely spotted, or more correctly: the rest of us must have been blind for not seeing this. --Saddhiyama (talk) 21:37, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoax?
Talk:Scottish Gaelic

message: The article An Leabhar Mòr has been proposed for deletion. I can't decide whether this is important or not. Maybe Gaelic enthusiasts would like to look in there? Doric Loon (talk) 15:38, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads-up. I'm not actually sure what the criteria are for pages regarding pages on individual books/art projects aimed at a fairly small community? Any thoughts? Akerbeltz (talk) 18:00, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  An Leabhar Mòr