lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Filamentation

message: Jparcoeur (talk) 15:02, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

message: *I'm not an expert on Bacteria. I just stumbled over a number of article in which filamentous growth appear to be normal, and actually help the bacteria to avoid predation by larger, phagocitouos protists. Thus it might need some serious rewriting.
Hahn MW, Höfle MG (1998) Grazing Pressure by a bacterivorous flagellate reverses the relative abundance of Comamonas acidovorans PX54 and Vibrio strain CB5 in chemostat cocultures. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 64: 1910-1918.
Hahn MW, Moore ERB, Höfle MG (1999) Bacterial filament formation, a defense mechanism against flagellate grazing, is growth rate controlled in bacteria of different phyla. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 65: 25-35.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kunadam (talk • contribs) 21:58, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching

message: This article seem to be a bit biased toward cell biology, but since FRAP is being performed in several other applications, the article should thus be expanded. Also is there little information on the actual diffusion coefficient calculation and the different models existing to perform this (the equation suggested is one of the more crude ones and is more or less only usable in homogene solutions).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hakkman (talk • contribs) 02:57, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions on possible improvements 
Talk:Foam cell

message: ' ' ' ' 'This is Anderson2013a and I am improving this page for a class project under the supervision of Mr. Travis Bohrer (User:tbohrer74) at Waynesville High School.' ' ' ' '  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anderson2013a (talk • contribs) 14:14, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Foam cells
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Foam cells in cholesterolosis of the gallbladder. H&E stain.Foam cells are cells in an atheroma derived from both macrophages[1] and smooth muscle cells[2] which have accumulated low density lipoproteins, LDLs, by endocytosis. The LDL has crossed the endothelial barrier and has been oxidized by reactive oxygen species produced by the endothelial cells. Foam cells can also be known as fatty like streaks and typically line the intima media of the vasculature.
Foam cells are not dangerous as such, but can become a problem when they accumulate at a particular foci thus creating a necrotic centre of the atherosclerosis. If the fibrous cap that prevents the necrotic centre from spilling into the lumen of a vessel ruptures, a thrombus can form which can lead to emboli occluding smaller vessels. The occlusion of small vessels results in ischemia, and contributes to stroke and myocardial infarction, two of the leading causes of cardiovascular-related death.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.52.222.82 (talk) 22:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cells 

message: The term "phagocytes" was neither introduced nor linked - I corrected to "The oxidized LDL accumulates in the macrophages and other phagocytes, which are then known as foam cells", according to Atherosclerosis#Causes: "The body's immune system responds to the damage to the artery wall caused by oxidized LDL by sending specialized white blood cells (macrophages and T-lymphocytes) to absorb the oxidized-LDL forming specialized foam cells".
This seems to be in contrast to the first sentence of the present lemma: "Foam cells are cells in an atheroma derived from both macrophages and smooth muscle." Could someone check and correct, if necessary?
Regards --Jwollbold (talk) 12:52, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Precursor cells 

message: I wonder if there is a robust updated view about foam cells as M1 or M2 macrophages. I am confused by the differences in published articles: eg. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37059130/ and https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37215106/ (M1) vs. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29891687/ (M1/M2) vs. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22356914/ (M2). --Nirts (talk) 17:59, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  M1 or M2 ?
Talk:Follicular atresia

message: I am editing this page for a cell biology honors project under the supervision of Dr. Lesly Temesvari (Username: LTEMESV) at Clemson University.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpjett (talk • contribs) 04:47, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: — Assignment last updated by Saravo1 (talk) 17:22, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Foundations II

message: Clarify in the beginning FA is natural progression during aging in humans;
Adding diseases/disorders/treatments associated with FA complications;
Defining obliterating and cystic FA;
Clarifying/deleting nitrogen oxide effects on FA in rats section (no sources cited; potential source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18817198/);
Make language more gender neutral (?); remove/define jargon as needed  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michelle.nguyen5 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Foundations II 2022 Group 10 Proposed Edits

message: 1. Do the group's edits substantially improve the article as described in the Wikipedia peer review “Guiding framework”? 
Yes, the group clearly describes what follicular atresia is, then goes on to explain how it occurs, the subtypes, and follicle related disorders. Since this topic is very scientific, I liked how there were hyperlinks of some of the technical vocabulary so readers unfamiliar to this topic know where to find more information. Overall, the group does a great job in dividing up the article into key sections. Some improvements I would suggest is to shorten the introduction. It was somewhat overwhelming with all the scientific terms and a simple overview of FA would better fit the introduction. Instead of removing those sentences entirely, I think some of the introduction can be moved into a section titled "Definition" before the "Mechanism" section may help break down the complex reading in the beginning. MicHuynh (talk) 16:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you so much for the feedback! Our group has shortened the introduction by moving some of the info to a new background section. Also the menopause section was moved into the background section as well. Aazad55 (talk) 21:08, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

text: Thank you for the feedback, James! We added a couple of pictures to help visualize the complexity of follicular atresia. Aazad55 (talk) 21:09, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Group 9 Peer Review 

message: Jay9Z reviewed #1-9; updated date for citation 2 and changed 8 since it was missing a title.
Jay9Z (talk) 17:04, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation Review
Talk:G1/S transition

message: I am updating this page. I plan on adding several new sections, changing some of the organization, and adding more depth of information. I have recently updated the lead section and plan on adding several images. If you have any suggestions they would be most welcome! Inbornone (talk) 20:00, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  updating page
Talk:GLUT2

message: The 'function' section does not make any sense at all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dalekmikey (talk • contribs) 09:25, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There probably should be some mention here of whether or not it uses insulin (what I came here to find out).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.43.188.206 (talk) 13:53, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insulin? 

message: I just added a wikilink for "brush border" in the "Function" section. I know that generally the first instance of something is the one that is wikified. But is a link that is "in-text" preferred over an "in-list" (the "Tissue Distribution" section), because it has a bit of context as to the relationship?  (in this case, upregulation of GLUT2 after you eat)? Jimw338 (talk) 17:13, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "In-Text" wikification preferred over "in-list"?
Talk:Gametocyte

message: Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax are not genera but species. And falciparum and vivax shouldn't be capitalized.--Miguelferig (talk) 16:48, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the first figure (with caption "Scheme showing analogies in the process of maturation of the ovum and the development of the spermatids") the word "cöcyte" appears twice.  I think that's an error.  Should it not be "oöcyte" ?  Jwpat7 (talk) 17:19, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding "cöcyte" vs "oöcyte" in first figure
Talk:Gastrin-releasing peptide

message: I think, this article has at least a little bit higher importance than "low". I would consider it least "intermediate". 
I also think that this: 
"Gastrin-releasing peptide, also known as GRP, is a human gene."
is a weird sentence. Peptides are not genes. Of course, we all(?) know that peptides are coded by genes, however, they are not the same thing. Not at all. 
You can say "Gastrin releasing peptide gene is a humgan gene" Or "the gene of the gastrin releasing peptide is a human gene" ... etc (I wouldn't say this with these words of course.), but the original sentence is an oxymoron. Genes are NOT proteins. Proteins are NOT genes. So please, do something about this sentence. THANK YOU!Myrmeleon formicarius (talk) 19:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: A more than weird sentence + an opinion about importance
Talk:Federal Correctional Institution, Herlong

message: If anyone's interested, I've proposed a new wikiproject for the creation and improvement of articles regarding specific prisons, internment camps, and detention centers here. --Cdogsimmons (talk) 02:12, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Prisons 

message: I corrected the geo code.
The picture in the gallery is of the main prison
The structure in the info box is an outbuilding.( Martin |  talk • contribs  01:37, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  geocode
Talk:Golgi cell

message: pitched this merger at WP:NEURO several months ago but didn't seem to get a response. I'd like to reopen the discussion: I think that Golgi I and Golgi II subtypes belong on the main Golgi cell page, because the sub-topics would benefit from the basic foundation offered by the main page, and the main topic would benefit from greater elaboration on its most notable sub-topics. If there are no vehement objections in the next 2-3 days, I will migrate the content over and focus on expanding the resulting article. Aeffenberger (talk) 16:18, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 21:49, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Golgi I]] and [[Golgi II]] 

message: Hello everyone, I, Ramsha Sheikh, am a student of Master's program of Molecular Biology and Genetics in Uskudar University. I've been assigned this topic for editing. I'm looking forward to work on it and interact with you all. Ramsha Sheikh (talk) 09:56, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing
Talk:Aspirational brand

message: Possibly useful reference to integrate is http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/03/business/03shop.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss which states "Target, analysts say, has a slightly different core customer than Wal-Mart. It has managed to project itself as a more "aspirational" brand, they say - customers call it "tar-jay" (French, you know) - as well as hiring Michael Graves to design tea kettles, and Isaac Mizrahi to design clothes." This helps establish that this term is in general usage. --Busy Stubber 16:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional reference
Talk:Haptotaxis

message: Can someone provide a link to the Berkeley website? I would greatly appreciate it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.130.133.84 (talk) 23:52, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hep G2

message: I'm reading a paper right now saying they are. Citation needed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.80.44.45 (talk) 01:08, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A citation to ATTC has been added for it being non-tumorigenic in nude mice. I can't find a statement to that effect either in the product information, or via a Google search of the site. Lavateraguy (talk) 19:07, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not tumorigenic in nude mice? 

message: A reader writes in to state that the HepG2 cell line actually originated as a hepatoblastoma and not a hepatocellular carcinoma, according to:
* 
Could someone look into it?--S Philbrick(Talk) 19:10, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  hepatoblastoma or hepatocellular carcinoma? 

message: Could someone add when this cell line was discovered; and where? This is mostly for historic references. 2A02:8388:1641:8380:6CA6:B9A3:D945:9F7C (talk) 17:19, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:List of armoured trains

message: The article needs inline citations to support a large number of totally unsourced and redlinked claims about various armored trains.  While any of these might be true, WIkipedia requires verifiability for them to remain in Wikipedia.  If we cannot locate sources, then all the redlinks and other unsourced material ought to be temporarily removed until sources can be found.  N2e (talk) 15:08, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs sources 

message: Hi:
I was looking for information on the Panzerjager-Triebwagen 51, was surprised that there is no mention of it, or even an entry for German armoured trains.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.66.140.242 (talk) 18:36, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  No entry for German trains?
Talk:Histone H2B

message: Somehow I find it hard to believe that Obie Trice would be referring to histone H2B rather than something else which is also abbreviated that way. Anyone with enough background knowledge to delete that? 78.23.165.213 (talk) 17:01, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture 

message: I am improving this page for a class project under the supervision of Dr. Lesly Temesvari (Username: LTEMESV) at Clemson University (Clemson, SC, USA).
Rrudisi (talk) 02:04, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class Project
Talk:Histone code

message: The histone code hypothesis is more about the access of transcription factors and activation/repression of genes via open/closed conformation of chromatin.  It doesn't really have to do with how DNA binds to histones.  The main definition in this article is unclear.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.39.115.49 (talk) 21:06, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 69.140.152.55 (talk) 04:50, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page has been tagged as being too technical for most readers to understand since November of 2008, but is no more technical than similar pages such as Epigenetic code.  Ideally, someone with expertise will read this and write a short for-the-layman introductory paragraph, but I suspect that the topic is innately hard to understand with the proper background. Unless someone objects, I am going to wait seven days and then remove the tag. Guy Macon (talk) 03:22, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleted tag. Guy Macon (talk) 11:53, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too technical for most readers to understand?
Talk:Hormone-sensitive lipase

message: This page is awful
:OK, so it needs some work... but "awful"? :-)  Suggested improvement--there is a contradiction in the text.  First, we have "...glucagon can also stimulate such responses" followed by "Previously, glucagon was thought to activate HSL, however the removal of insulin's inhibitory effects ('cutting the brakes) is the source of activation. The lipolytic effect of glucagon in adipose tissue is minimal in humans."  Both are unreferenced. Clayt85 (talk) 13:40, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/MSK-008 Dijeh

message: I must have missed this one, can I get an admin to temp-restore these so I can special:export the articles for migration to wikia:gundam? Maybe in my userspace or something. -- Ned Scott 21:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh, ok.. -- Ned Scott 08:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Hürthle cell

message: The source sited as 4 has no relevance to the comment it claims to be supporting.  The source refers to a case where renal(kidney) carcinoma cells are found in the thyroid.  Please remove and fix with a genuine source.50.53.97.10 (talk) 22:52, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Intracrine

message: "Intracrine refers to a hormone that acts inside a cell. Steroid hormones act through intracellular (mostly nuclear) receptors and are thus considered as intracrines."
Surely all hormones act inside cells, don't they?  And not all steroid hormones are "considered as intracrines," are they? Unfree (talk) 21:41, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion in opening paragraph

message: Anon490 (talk) 17:01, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article evaluation
Talk:Ionophore

message: Hey, man, an ionophore for Ca+? 
Where did you ever see  Ca+??
I doubt that this exists!
Best regards,
Ueli
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.72.86.239 (talk) 20:02, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And likewise Ba+ at the time of this comment. Fixed long ago. DMacks (talk) 04:02, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ca<sup>+</sup>? 

message: Can anyone add which ones are antibiotic and against what type of bacteria ? Rod57 (talk) 16:52, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  antibiotic properties 

message: It's fairly well-cited, so I don't want to delete it unilaterally - I don't know how true it is, read in a vacuum - but while I know we're supposed to assume good faith, it's hard not to think that the anon who added these did so to further an agenda, so I wanted to see what others' thoughts were, maybe someone familiar with the subject.  Twin Bird (talk) 01:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's too much. I could support a few sentences about zinc ionophores in general. For example, how about prose (not just bullet-header) about key structural motifs, and the biochemical relevance of zinc ionophores. The cited review articles are a good start. I don't support a laundry-list of in-vitro targets/results at all...too preliminary even if not strictly in scope of WP:MEDRS It seems like there are many such chemicals that are bluelinks, so I think we need to avoid trying to list them all. Maybe instead (as I said before) the key structure-types as supported by secondary-refs, merged into the "List of representative biological ionophores" section? DMacks (talk) 03:59, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  Someone got a hold of this article and twisted the definition.  I  got distracted from finding a def for ionophore that would allow the article to be revised back toward traditional lines, i.e. crown ethers and some antibiotics. As it stands, anything that binds Zn++ is an ionophore. Seems undue weight.--Smokefoot (talk) 11:54, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This new zinc/virus bit
Talk:Juxtacrine signalling

message: The title of the article is misspelled. It should be Juxtacrine signaling.Cfpresley 02:31, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Most American dictionaries give signalling as well as signaling; see American and British English spelling differences#Doubled consonants. -R. S. Shaw 18:20, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While the article gives a general definition of juxtacrine signaling along with a few examples, it doesn’t really go into the mechanisms by which the signaling works. It could be improved by expounding on “Notch signaling” by giving a detailed explanation of the molecular mechanisms involved and the pathway that it controls.    Nia2993 (talk) 18:27, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Juxtacrine Signaling  

message: — Assignment last updated by Syaseen2021 (talk) 02:31, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Developmental and Molecular Biology Spring 2023

message: — Assignment last updated by Anaimzade (talk) 18:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Developmental and Molecular Biology Spring 2024
Talk:Keratin 1

message: Keratin 1 Critique:
The article had a great structure, the author didn't have a specific position and used reliable sources. The only problem, a big one, was that the author copy and pasted the information from the sources. The author provided citations, but that does not mean anything when the information is copy and pasted. Plagiarism is not tolerated by Wikipedia due to copyright issues. If it weren't for this, the article would have been great.
Felizj2 (talk) 15:07, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: CK1 normally stands for Casein kinase 1, the redirect should be fixed if possible.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.46.139 (talk) 10:08, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  incorrect redirect
Talk:L-selectin

message: I am a student editing this page for a course assignment. Below I am listing three review articles from the past couple years that I will be using to add some recent and relevant information on this topic.
Ivetic, Aleksandar. “A Head-to-Tail View of L-Selectin and Its Impact on Neutrophil Behaviour.” Cell and Tissue Research 371, no. 3 (March 2018): 437–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-017-2774-x.
Ivetic, Aleksandar, Hannah Louise Hoskins Green, and Samuel James Hart. “L-Selectin: A Major Regulator of Leukocyte Adhesion, Migration and Signaling.” Frontiers in Immunology 10 (May 14, 2019): 1068. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01068.
Segura, Jason, Biao He, Joanna Ireland, Zhongcheng Zou, Thomas Shen, Gwynne Roth, and Peter D. Sun. “The Role of L-Selectin in HIV Infection.” Frontiers in Microbiology 12 (September 29, 2021): 725741. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.725741.
Immcarle179 (talk) 14:50, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for future edits
Talk:Bake sale

message: There seems to be some confusion here over the difference between a reference and an external link. "All items used as sources in the article must be listed in the "References" or "Notes" section, and are usually not included in "Further reading" or "External links"." This article currently has no references or citations for the text, so it cannot be verified. Please help fix this problem if you can. Thank you. --Busy Stubber 14:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References versus external links

message: I wonder if there are any bestselling items at bake sales nationally/worldwide (like, say, Brownies.)
It seems like that would be presented as a fact somewhere. It would certainly make the article more interesting and informative! 72.160.170.225 (talk) 03:22, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bestsellers? 

message: Is there a Wikipedia Fundraising Category for information? Perhaps this page should be added to it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.160.170.225 (talk) 03:23, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fundraising Category 

message: Haha, what? "health nuts"? Yeah, not so great. 
124.171.229.81 (talk) 04:55, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly written
Talk:The News International

message: The only two sources cited in this article have doubtful reliability and point of view.  One of the sources is an open discussion forum while the other is a clearly biased blog. --RDavi404 (talk) 17:15, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources