Talk:Višegrad massacres

message: The previous version implies that over 10,000 civilians were killed during the war. In fact, the Guardian article refers to 14,000 "rid" in Višegrad, which apparently account for both expelled and killed. The CCPR and IWPR reports report mass killings (apparently, several) in the ranges of 60-200 people; while the events were terrible, the sources should be cited meticiously for such sensitive events. Duja► 16:28, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: {{tl|citecheck}}

message: :It isn't much (just a very brief paragraph), but the Mazowiecki reports does cite a survivor/witness of the Visegrad massacre in his reports on human rights violations in the former Yugoslavia.
Visegrad
: Here is another page of articles relating to Visegrad: Michael Sells VisegradGardenfli 00:07, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Visegrad sources

message: How about a link to your Vilina Vlas stub as well? --Opbeith 21:12, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  See Also section 

message: HanzoHattori, in your edit of "Aftermath" you refer to "his sentence".  As the wording of your edit stands I'd take this to refer to Lukic, who hasn't been tried yet, so there's no judgment at the ICTY site and obviously no sentence.  You put a link to the meaning of "sentence" but then you use it to mean "judgment" instead.
Lukic's indictment charges him with approximately 150 deaths.  If in fact you're referring to a judgment against one of the Vasiljevic brothers it would be useful to provide a link to the judgment at the ICTY website.  I'm absolutely certain that any judgment there won't refer to Lukic being responsible for thousands of deaths since there isn't any judgment on the charges against Lukic yet and the charges only refer to about 150 deaths.  What any judgment may say is that the "Milan Lukic group" were responsible for those thousands of deaths.  You need to rephrase and substantiate your edit. --Opbeith 10:50, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aftermath 

message: :Image:UCK NLA.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 11:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:UCK NLA.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Višegrad massacres. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070707071037/http://www.idc.org.ba:80/onama/izvjestaj_analize_po_centrima.html to http://www.idc.org.ba/onama/izvjestaj_analize_po_centrima.html#podrinje
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:57, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified