lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Districts of Bristol

message: Most of this duplicates the Areas of Bristol template and there is no distinction in the areas covered. Simply south not SS, sorry 16:27, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, I would support a merger and then a cleanup.  No-one refers to Clifton East, not many to Ashley.  Perhaps a link on the city council article to their ward-finder. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:23, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, they need merging, there's no point in having two separate templates. I started doing this over a year ago, but got sidetracked and forgot about it. A possible combined version is in my sandbox. — Gasheadsteve Talk to me 18:50, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I like the sandbox version. I'd be annoyed about losing the ward template as I spent a long time sorting every bristol image on commons by ward. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:25, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice one! --TimTay (talk) 21:11, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

text: All transclusions have been updated. There's a few links I didn't modify though. §hep  •  Talk 21:57, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Joseph Leckie Academy

message: I don't currently have sufficient privileges to move this page. It requires updating to reflect the move to Joseph Leckie Academy. Philipjohn21 (talk) 18:09, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Moving 
Talk:List of protected areas of New Brunswick

message: I propose to merge List of provincial parks in New Brunswick into List of protected areas of New Brunswick. There's no significant difference between the two articles - both are tabular lists of conservation areas with wikilinks to appropriate articles. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 01:12, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Previously proposed in March 2019. – wbm1058 (talk) 14:56, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I see it was proposed way back when and no one commented. I support the merger. Other Canadian articles, such as List of protected areas of Saskatchewan are all lumped into one. Makes sense to do it here too. Masterhatch (talk) 15:20, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 15:49, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Ladies European Tour

message: How about a List of golfers with most LET wins? This is at least in the template under "major tours". Or is such kind of list anywhere to be taken? 82.141.65.245 (talk) 07:50, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Created List of golfers with most Ladies European Tour wins. Tewapack (talk) 21:50, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested page

message: There is no point in have duplicate schedules for 2013 at both Ladies European Tour#2013 schedule and results and 2013 Ladies European Tour. In the past, the schedule was on the main page and the yearly page was a redirect until the season was over. Then the table was moved to the yearly page and fleshed out into a full article. The trend for most tours has been to create the yearly page as a full article from the start of the season and point to it from the main article. This makes the main tour pages more manageable in size. Tewapack (talk) 03:51, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  2013 schedule 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/List of Republics/Workshop

message: At the moment, we seem to have five "Motions and requests by the parties". Are these proposed findings of fact? Remedies? Enforcement?   A few of them seem to be relating content issues, a few seem to have elements that ArbCom can deal with - if there are some actual proposals, could the proposers move them to the locations, so everyone else has some idea of what you're actually asking of the ArbCom so we can comment and help improve them. --Nema Fakei 15:59, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I wasn't sure that I was able to add to those sections. I moved my "motion and request" to the section and added some to the principles, findings of fact, remedies, and enforcement. What kind of things would go in the "motions and requests by parties" section? Sancho 18:32, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In general, a "motion" is a suggestion that the arbitrators need to take action that would be effective during the case (as opposed to the final decision that takes effect when the case is closed). A "request" would be something like "I'm taking a trip and will be on wikibreak for the next week, can we put this on hold until I get back." In this case, all of the items in this section probably should have been in the proposed final decision section lower on the page. But, people should not worry too much about this sort of thing, because the arbitrators understand that most editors aren't familiar with the format and don't worry too much about this sort of thing. Hope this helps. Newyorkbrad 19:41, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorisation of proposals 

message: Although I'd very much like to make points, answer questions, and provide evidence on any content issues that are brought up within the discussion on the main Arbitration case pages, I am also aware that these are distractions from the issues at hand. I think these issues would be more helpful and accessible on the respective article pages - or on User Talk pages. Therefore, if you want any content issues answered, please message me. --Nema Fakei 19:28, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content discussion on project pages
Talk:Kangchu system

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Mkativerata (talk) 22:32, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education

message: I wanted to start the ball rolling on discussing adding more sections. One of interest would be a synopsis of how an institution goes through the NCATE process. I worked at a small liberal arts college  that went through a successful Initial Accreditation. When I was hired by the college, I came in the middle of the process. The process is very long, but I think it's possible to sum it up to give readers a glimpse into the process. It would be very important for educators who may read this article.
Rayghost (talk) 03:55, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion on possible sections to add 

message: The Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation redirects to this page. Shouldn’t it be the other way around? NCATE is CAEP’s predecessor organization and does not have a page of its own. Should a new page be created? ABT021 (talk) 14:39, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  CAEP Redirect
Talk:List of political parties in New Brunswick

message: I have taken the liberty of updating the page to the best of my ability and making sure that the information presented in the page reflects the present day. Lamp21 (talk) 05:49, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The list of political parties in New Brunswick page has not been kept up to date. 
Talk:The Lincoln Lawyer

message: The upcoming Netflix TV series is actually based on the second book in the Lincoln Lawyer series, The Brass Verdict.  Should that section be moved to that particular novel's page?  ekedolphin (talk) 01:01, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's ok for brief mentions on both this article page and on The Brass Verdict article. The content on the Netflix series within this article and Brass Verdict needs only to be brief, with the majority of content appearing on the TV show's own individual article. BarkeepChat 13:47, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: TV Series
Talk:The Ghost & Mrs. Muir (TV series)

message: I'm watching the episodes one a day so will fill them in as I do so. (193.250.59.233 (talk) 22:24, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Episodes

message: Was Grusin possibly influenced by Weinberger's Schwanda the Bagpiper?  Strong analogue.  Worth mentioning? algocu (talk) 18:33, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musical influence
Talk:Manomet, Massachusetts

message: Cape Cod Ave is most definetly NOT a landmark in this area.  Neither is Sweet Lemons, or Churchills.  Sweet lemons is a diner of no particular importance, and Churchills is the local propane merchant, also of little significance.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.67.116.124 (talk) 02:39, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Si Inthrathit

message: *
Siamese Heritage Trust has put free PDFs on line of the Journal of the Siam Society (JSS) going back to the first in 1904. In Retrospect', p.1 of the above, Dhani  writes:"Their first centre of any considerable magnitude was around Snkhothai, known by tho name of the state of Sajjanälai Sukhothai. Its origin has been recorded in an inscription (1) the gist of which was that a Thai chief, Khun Bang Klāng Thao, in alliance with another Thai prince rose against the Khmer and proclaimed their indepen-....
—
1. cf. Coedès, Recueil des inscriptions du Siam, Vol. I, p. 7.[Language: French.  Publisher: Bangkok times press, 1924-]
Dhani thus gives a reference for the lede as written, but begs the question of Thao vs. Hao'. We already have Thai honorific Sri/Si; honorific Thao is right above it, but honorifics go before a name, not at the end. Given that we're dealing with a stone inscription and since the initial characters are so similar, it is no great leap to see Thao () was a misreading of Hao (). I don't yet have a reference for who first noted the discrepancy, but I do see one with the translation of Pho Khun Bang Klang Hao () as Lord Who Rules Sky. Phokhun may be streatched to mean Lord, and Bangklang, as empty or clear sky, but Hao as written simply means yawn. Adding tone-marker-2 to make it  gives a different word that means audacious, bold; which puts me in mind of more accurate translation being the the English phrase, "Bolt from the Blue!"  
JSS does have a reference for Pho Khun () as a kinship-like honorific for a king or chieftain that could be added above the aforementioned entry for Thao.
*Terwiel, Barend Jan. JSS Vol. 71.0 1983 Ahom and the Study of Early Thai Society 
Table 1 : Terms indicating rank, title or class from early Siamese sources
:khun: ruler of a fortified town and its surrounding villages, together called a mu'ang.
:In older sources the prefix phō ("father") is sometimes used as well.
This article should also give the Thai spelling for Pho Khun Sri Indraditya (), and make clear that this is an ex-post-facto regnal name derived from Indra (), god of war and of thunderstorms, whose weapon is the lightning bolt; suffixed with  from  sun; yet again putting me in mind of "Bolt from the Blue!" —Pawyilee (talk) 15:50, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: More
*JSS Vol. 14.1 1921. Coedes, G. The Origins of the Sukhodaya Dynasty	
*JSS Vol. 61.1 1973.  Chand Chirayu Rajani, M.C. Review Article: Griswold and Prasert EHS 1-8.
*JSS Vol. 61.2 1973. Chand Chirayu Rajani, M.C. Review Article: Griswold and Prasert EHS 9 and 10
—Pawyilee (talk) 16:02, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  References "Bolt from the Blue!" 

message: Ban Mueang died and so the Kingdom went to Ram Kamhaeng Maharat. Stjohn1970 (talk) 10:40, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elder brother
Category talk:German Roman Catholics

message: Only add people for whom their Catholicism is a defining characteristic for them or is or was related to their notability. I already removed Adolf Hitler and I will remove more. See the pending. Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_July_23#People_by_former_religion 
Andries 16:37, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your restriction is dubious as one can see by glancing at the subcategories of :Category:Roman Catholics by nationality.  It might be appropriate for you to re-read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest to avoid double standards.--71.105.243.108 (talk) 21:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Defining characteristic for them or related to their notability
Talk:Viper (G.I. Joe)

message: I've updated the list to include all know Viper variations, not just the ones from the original RAH line. 24.178.211.155 16:47, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Viper List

message: I feel that the entire Controversy section needs to outright go, but I am loathe to outright delete such a huge section.
It's simply all speculation, really, but it's so -big-. Lots42 14:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone who isn't currently undergoing a whangdoodle of a headache, like me, should incorporate all the above information into the article itself. Lots42 03:35, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Controversy is too strong a word. And since the whole Viper/Trooper thing is not that big a deal, I would opt more for "confusion". What does everyone think? --Destron Commander 10:35, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: 'Fans speculate' just can't be a good phrase to have in this article...also there's some typos floating around; I don't quite know how to fix the speculation so I'd rather not screw things up. Lots42 (talk) 14:22, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand there -is- a lot of confusion about Vipers and thus, the article should say so. I just think there's a better way to say so, but I have no idea how. Lots42 (talk) 11:35, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thoughts 

message: Should the Night Stalkers really be covered here? They are not really Vipers. If they are covered here then why not other non-Viper Cobra troop types? MAd HaTtEr2k (talk) 02:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Night Stalkers

message: Already added a toy one. Can someone upload photos of the Vipers based from the cartoons/comics/other media? Thanks. Ominae (talk) 06:33, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Viper photos

message: cooolest toy  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.154.150.198 (talk) 19:02, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  coolest toy
Talk:Tikkun Chatzot

message: whose minhag is it to recite Psalm 102 before tikkun chatzos?  perhaps one verse of Psalm 102, but not the entire Psalm
Itzik18 18:09, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know. I translated the article from the Hebrew wiki, and as you can see, it was incomplete. nadav (talk) 04:36, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Psalm 102?
Talk:Dan Jinks

message: After addition of external link , the page contains suitable reference if one tries a little. So, I am removing the unreferenced tag/ no context tag. --Bhadani (talk) 16:52, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference, etc.
Talk:Akdamut

message: There is no need for the book cover. I am not sure if it really qualifies as fair use anyway.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.98.212.50 (talk) 04:27, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is the folk tale "absurd" - this seems a POV that is not neutral - for example belief in yarweh could be described as an absurd folk tale, with equal measure in an encylopedia.
The magician of Lublin - English translation from yiddish, chapter 5 refers to "the hymn of Acdamuth" - is this the same thing?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.113.96.60 (talk) 01:24, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: POV & Magician of Lubin
Talk:History of Eastern Christianity

message: Please post what in the neutrality of the article is in question here so that they might be addressed and or resolved.
LoveMonkey (talk) 13:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality in question

message: This article needs more sources for verification. I know it has been tagged as such, but I'm just giving a friendly reminder. :-)Bless sins (talk) 04:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Nearly the entire article is describing the same historical phenomena as History of Christianity, it's not focusing on the east at all. It would only become interesting to describe Eastern Christianity after the split between western and eastern churches, but that's hardly included here. So I would consider this article to be entirely redundant. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:43, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Visual novels/played

message: If I have only completed a couple routes on a game can I still list it here? Jyuichi 03:40, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think we ever considered partial clears before. I've never played fully through any of the ones I have listed here, but as it says, we list the ones we have played, or at least have in our possession (won't saw own as downloading is always prevalent). I do not think we should have to specify the ones we've only partially played through though.--十八 04:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partial clears
Talk:Charles Ruas

message: I've created an initial short entry for Ruas, and wil be fleshing it out over time. Any assistance, contributions, criticisms, or corrections more than welcome. AtomikWeasel 17:29, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While it tells a little about him, the work so far does not make explicit what – per Wikipedia standards – makes him notable. Askari Mark (Talk) 21:25, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is the title of the New York Times article used as a source in this article?  I don't have a paid NYT account, and without one I cannot figure out the title of the article. Graham87 09:02, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Title: 'Christmas 1985; Notable Books of the Year', The New York Times, 8 December 1985. AtomikWeasel (talk) 16:39, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I've added that information to the article. Graham87 01:24, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New York Times article 
Talk:Wesco Financial

message: I have thousands of Blue Chip Stamps as well as a few S and H Green St63.3.14.130 17:40, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Square Tallaght

message: What's the name of the shopping centre, The Square Tallaght or The Square Shopping Centre? @DylanMcKaneWiki: You moved the page, so can you shed some light on the source for the change in name? —C.Fred (talk) 14:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind; I checked the official website, which styles itself The Square Tallaght, so I've used that spelling throughout the article and cleared the  flag. —C.Fred (talk) 14:29, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction in name
Talk:Sheila Terry (actress)

message: Perhaps the listing of Roy Sedley as a spouse should be removed. This article from the October 18, 1936, issue of The San Francisco Examiner indicates that Sedley was married to another woman named Sheila Terry. Eddie Blick (talk) 02:42, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , in 1922 she was 12 years old, so cleary there was an confusion with the names. Alexcalamaro (talk) 05:12, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, .Eddie Blick (talk) 00:00, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roy Sedley 

message: In a space towards the top of the page it appears that reason for ending of marriage (death or dissolution) on both of her spouses do not match what is written below in the “Personal Life” section. 107.1.193.244 (talk) 12:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mismatch
Talk:Giovanni Battista Galestruzzi

message: vfdsswewdsvfddnf55gybh$jcggdfs3dgfsx3gffvxedgff4bmjhh4d5v6b7n89  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.239.90.65 (talk) 23:31, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sursum corda

message: ==Untitled==
The mozarabic rite has its own text of the sursum corda, slighty different from other Latin Rites, do you think it could be appropiate to put it here? (Latin or English?)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DaniloVilicic (talk • contribs) 00:16, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mozarabic Rite

message: The mozarabic rite has its own text of the sursum corda, slighty different from other Latin Rites, do you think it could be appropiate to put it here? (Latin or English?)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DaniloVilicic (talk • contribs) 00:16, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is this relevant? How noticeable is this family?-- 212.63.43.180 (talk) 21:19, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Family motto of the Howsons"??? 

message: I have made a slight change to the lede (diff). It previously stated that the dialogue originates in the third century, but that's not accurate. Our earliest source for it is Hippolytus' Apostolic Tradition (c. A.D. 215), but unless we assume that the dialogue was new coinage at that time (by himself or others), which is exceedingly unlikely, it must predate him. On the other hand, we can't date its origin with any accuracy, so calling it "second century" or "first century" won't work, which leaves the locution I've added: it "dat[es] back to at least the third century." - Simon Dodd { U·T·C·WP:LAW } 12:55, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dating
Talk:Chabad house

message: What is the relevancy of Chabad of Southampton to this general topic? 122.172.250.23 (talk) 06:13, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

message: If nobody objects within a day or two I will remove the piece about Southhampton. Larryyr (talk) 03:27, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Southhampton?
Talk:Flight sergeant

message: At present we have the following in the opening paragraph: "Flight Sergeant is a non-commissioned rank in some air forces, above Chief Technician and below Warrant Officer".  One problem with this is that it fails to state which air forces use the rank.  Stating which sort of air forces is key summary information.  A second problem is that not all air forces which use the rank, place it between Chief Technician and Warrant Officer.
In some other air force rank articles the Commonwealth is indicated (ie "is a rank in some Commonwealth air forces") however this is not entirely correct here (or in several other places).  For example this rank is used in the Irish Air Corps and the Air Force of Zimbabwe (neither Ireland nor Zimbabwe are currently Commonwealth members).  The determining factor here is that the air forces in question were or are under a degree of RAF influence.  My favoured wording is "Flight Sergeant is a non-commissioned rank in the British Royal Air Force and several other air forces which have adopted all or part of the RAF rank structure."  This wording explaines in a clear and concise manner which air forces use the rank.  I would ask that Australians (or others) who object to this wording might want to ask themselves "If the RFC and RAF had not first used the rank, would the RAAF (or other air force) be using it today?" Greenshed 18:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Change that to "Flight Sergeant is senior a non-commissioned rank ..." Greenshed 18:25, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Which air forces?
Talk:Beaver, Arkansas

message: The article says the following:
:Beaver, Arkansas was founded by Wilson Asbury "Squire" Beaver, Sr, born June 7, 1831 died May 13,1915. He married 1852 to Rhoda Emeline Waits, she was born December 19, 1829 in Tennessee; died April 19, 1877 in Beaver, Carroll Co, Arkansas.  They are buried at Beaver Cemetery, Beaver, Carroll County, Arkansas.  They were parents of ten children.
Can anyone verify this is true? Also, I think the founder of Beaver Arkansas is not really "trivia" but important information! 
Please note I've removed quite a bit of unnecessary genealogy. - Tbsdy lives (talk) 10:57, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founder? 
Talk:Aceramarca gracile opossum

message: There is nothing at Flickr. I'll have to settle for another one from the genus. Richard001 (talk) 01:10, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture request 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Derby's Woolly Opossum which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 02:03, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress