lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Congaree National Park

message: Alligators are listed among the animals in the park, but there is no mention of them, either in the park internet site or in the Reptiles in the Congaree National Park or in the citation for the whole section (Congaree National Park - South Carolina). In another site (Traveler’s Checklist: Congaree National Park) I even found the statement  "Alligators can’t nest in the park because of the frequent flooding".  So are there alligators in the park? אביהו (talk) 17:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed that since there is no evidence alligators exist in the park.--MONGO 17:46, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: NPS: https://www.nps.gov/cong/planyourvisit/canoeing.htm - "occasional alligator" (page dated August 2016). Brian W. Schaller (talk) 22:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alligators?
Wikipedia talk:Avoid using preview button

message: but I actually did lose a major edit one time when using the preview button. I got one of those foundation error messages when I hit preview, and when I clicked the back button, it was gone. I've since found that my browsers reload button will generally save the day, but I have since started cutting and pasting edits to a word file before hitting preview. Youngamerican 19:22, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, it is. 76.181.64.113 (talk) 23:37, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is funny,

message: Hey, I was reading this page and I didn't liek (tyop in10did) that the screenshot of the show preview button didn't do anything special. I was just wondering if it was possible for us to link that to Wikipedia:KABOOM! (It might make this a featured joke page XD) 108.45.72.235 (talk) 17:41, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just a cool Idea. 

message: How do you parse all text in your heaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-----error Error ERROR erRoR eRRor ErrOr erRoR ErrOR ERrOr ERrOR eRrOr erROr eRRor ERroR eRrOr ERrOR ErRoR eRRoR eRRor eRrOr ErrOr erRoR ErRoR eRrOR erRoR eRRoR eRRor ERror eRroR ErRor ErrOR eRRoR eRRoR eRRoR eRRoR erRoR eRRoR eRrOr ErRor eRrOr ErRoR erROr ERroR eRroR errOR ErRoR erROr eRror erRor ERroR errOR ERroR errOR ERroR eRrOr eRror ErRor eRror eRrOR eRrOr errOR ERrOR ERrOr erRoR erRoR ErroR errOR erRor erROr eRroR erROr eRRor ERror eRroR ErRor eRrOr eRroR eRRoR erROr eRRoR erRoR ErROr ErrOr errOr erRoR erROr ErRoR ERror errOR erROr ErROr eRror erRor ERror eRror errOr eRRoR errOR eRrOr eRRoR eRrOr ErROr eRRor eRRor eRrOr erROr ErROr ErROr ErRor ERrOR eRrOr ErrOR ERror ErroR eRRoR eRRor ErRoR erROr ErroR erRor ErRoR eRrOr ERrOR eRRoR eRRoR ErroR ErROr eRrOR erROr erROr eRRor ErRor ErROr erRoR eRrOr errOr erROr ErROr ERrOR erROr eRRor ERroR ErRoR error----------------------------------------------------------------------------------  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:8D47:5800:E85B:4202:B7B3:429E (talk) 20:03, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uh..... 

message: Wow I never knew that! Oh wait, I’ve used it before.
I got a score of 149 on the Wikiholic test. 2601:600:C781:A900:79B3:D315:BEC8:3299 (talk) 22:48, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  There’s a preview button?
Talk:Dactylis

message: I have added a section on 'Cat Grass' just now. I write from the perspective of a cat owner, not a botanist, and I'm concerned that my choice of words re state of growth of the grass might not be entirely proper. Someone might like to edit the final sentence in particular - essentially the cats love it when the grass is juvenile, soft and pliable blades, but lose interest when the grass matures and the stems/blades become 'woody'. Thoughts? 220.240.227.91 23:53, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cat grass 

message: I followed a link to cat grass and it led me here, but there is no mention of it in the article. Rothorpe (talk) 02:13, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: No longer

message: "Orchard grass" should appear in the first lines of the article, in my opinion.  Relatively few North Americans are familiar with any other common name for D. glomerata, and the current first mention of "orchard grass" so deep in the page sets up a lot of potential confusion.  I visited this article minutes ago, for example, when I wanted to confirm that the Dactylis glomerata mentioned in a journal article was the orchard grass I knew.  --Belgrano 14:46, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Orchard grass" name placement 
Talk:Abba Are the Enemy

message: No matter how many times I read the instructions, nominating an article for deletion always seems to complicated for me to do.  But this "article" is not just "like" an advertisement, it clearly is an advertisement.  This is about an album by a band who doesn't already have a page in the encyclopedia, and the guy who wrote it left his email address.  NickelShoe 19:24, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion in order
Talk:White House, Bishkek

message: I think it is common on Wikipedia to use a comma and then the place where the building is located, not in brackets? Gryffindor 19:34, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Support, and also support Kusma's proposal. Drop me a note once you've started discussion on the standard.  ナイトスタリオン ✉ 01:20, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There's no real need for this article to link back to White House or similar, since the reader cannot have arrived at "White House, Bishkek" without intending to go there. For more, see WP:NAMB. Melchoir (talk) 03:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hatnotes 
Talk:Twin Town

message: This article is biased....there's not much background knowledge and the writer uses "reviews on the net generally range from" as a way of indirectly saying he doesn't think it's very good.
Trystan Morris-Davies 19:36, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I used the phrase because there is a wide range of reaction to the film. I am a fan of the thing, but it has to be said that the bulk of the online reviews are less impressed. Actually, if I were rewriting, I would remove that phrase, because without references it becomes "original research", something Wikipedia is not in favour of. Background knowledge: what kind of background knowledge would you like to see in the article? I do intend to come back to it sometime. If you don't want to fix it yourself (welcome to Wikipedia: feel free to edit and improve it!), some comments about what you feel is lacking would help whoever edits it next. --Telsa 16:51, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias

message: The BFI Film & TV database here lists four: Rhos Cwmtawe Male Voice Choir, Pontarddulais Male Voice Choir, Clwb Rygbl Treforus Male Voice Choir and Fardref Male Voice Choir. So it seems that honours were shared? Martinevans123 (talk) 16:52, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Choir
Talk:Charles Whistler

message: Moved from article page:
!(-- would be great great if we could get a CONFIRMED chronological order going... I really don't have a clue if above is correctly interpreted from the book's storyline and prefaces... And how about a complete bibliography... Paging any historian/anglicist with interest in British/Scandinavian early Medieval history and literature...)
It says he wrote things the plays between '600' and '1100'.  Does this mean he wrote plays (was a playwrite) or he wrote novels that were set in that time frame? RJFJR 14:39, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sarah Flannery

message: The paper Cryptography - A new algorithm versus the RSA is published on Flannery's website.   The article claims that the paper was published in 1999.   As of January 2006,  Mathematical Reviews has not published a review of the paper, which indicates that the paper was never published in a mathematical journal. --Aleph4 17:53, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cryptography - A new algorithm versus the RSA
Talk:Big Bad Beetleborgs

message: Andrea Lowell mentioned on her radio show yesterday that she was in the cast of this show.  Does anyone know what role she played?  Since she has gone on to some fame it would be good to add that to the page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.191.175.204 (talk) 16:34, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andrea Lowell in the cast? 

message: Lyrics to songs, even to television theme songs, are often copyrighted.  If it can be demonstrated that these lyrics are not, then they should be moved to wikisource.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:59, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics 

message: Could this show have been used to introduce sentai to young kids? I think so. 71.111.215.224 19:40, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because B-Fighter and B-Fighter Kabuto are technically not sentai. JPG-GR 17:44, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction to sentai? 

message: both the jos have a myspace —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.169.10.89 (talk) 22:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Myspace

message: The name Gargolem, thought to be the creature's name from Drew's daydream, is actually a misspelled version of Ghoulum, the statue monster's name from Hillhurst Mansion. Sorry about any confusion, this should fix it. --VRTrooperFan 05:14, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  the name "Gargolem" 

message: Just wondering why this article claims Drew's powers were based on a goliath beetle when Juukou B-Fighter says they were based on the rhinoceros beetle. Arrowned 01:12, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goliath beetle? 

message: This was mainly action but the Flubber jokes had comedy/sitcom I think. Any sources ID this? ScratchMarshall (talk) 18:10, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Sitcom elements
Talk:Vaporizer (inhalation device)

message: First it says "Vaporizing is more efficient than smoking, because approximately 30% of THC in marijuana or hashish cigarettes is destroyed by pyrolysis during smoking.[33]" then it says later: "The study stated that the amount of THC delivered by vaporizers were equivalent to the amount delivered by smoking.[37] Because of those studies and other studies, vaporizers are considered medically sound devices for delivering THC.[40]".
Doesn't the second quote contradict the first, because if 'equivalent' means 'same' then that means you need to take the same dose of cannabis for each method to deliver the same amount of THC? I can't access the studies, but I also can't think of another meaning of 'equivalent' in this context.
84.119.3.225 (talk) 14:21, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't that mean that you need less stuff but will get an equivalent dose? Presumably in both cases the "amount delivered" is up to the user, & how long he keeps going. E-cig studies have tried to establish a "standard puff" for machine smoking but it doesn't work very well imo. Johnbod (talk) 14:41, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've looked up one of the studies that were linked to by the source that Wikipedia links to. It says there in "Some smoking characteristics of marijuana cigarettes": "Under constant draft conditions in which the whole cigarette is consumed in a single puff, and under which virtually no smoke is lost as sidestream smoke, 69% translation of THC to mainstream smoke is obtained. This represents the maximum proportion of THC which could be obtained in the smoke from a marijuana cigarette. Some 31% of THC is not found upon analysis of the smoke condensate, and is presumed destroyed by pyrolysis."84.119.3.225 (talk) 06:45, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logical inconsistency? 

message: , in this edit, were you verifying against Jacob or the footnoted sources? -- Beland (talk) 18:13, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I could not find a source written in January 2019 by Jacob in the journal, the Proceedings of the Physiological Society. The footnoted sources verifies the current claim. The text I deleted is not a good summary of electronic cigarettes. QuackGuru (talk) 16:23, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. -- Beland (talk) 04:56, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed verification edit
Talk:List of political parties in Syria

message: Are both factions of the SCP really in the NPF? Arre 20:26, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, did my homework, apparently they are. Arre 21:43, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: http://www.sana.sy/eng/337/2011/11/21/382932.htm
Syrian Democratic Party and the Solidarity Party.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.17.115.224 (talk) 17:03, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New political parties  
Talk:List of Texas railroads

message: These little marks are part of many U. S. railroad corporate titles as the railroad names were reported to the Interstate Commerce Commission. It is evidentily Wikipedia Policy to change actual corporate titles by substituting the word "and" instead of the ampersand "&". This is done to enhance linkability between articles. This is not the correct corporate title in some cases. For example the correct title in 1948 for the Santa Fe is The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company. By substituting an incorrect name Wikipedia is practicing a type of revisionist history and the true name is lost.  --SSW9389 (talk) 20:57, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ampersands "&" in Railroad titles 

message: Why not have portals on cat pages?  Those are some of the pages people may be on the longest, looking for links or info they could find more easily with portals.  Joe  I 11:30, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, this ia list, not a cat.  But I still don't see why not to have portals.  Joe  I 11:37, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Protals

message: I'm not sure if the following belong: 
*Brownsville and Matamoros Bridge Company
*Dallas Union Terminal Company
*Houston Belt and Terminal Railway
*Texarkana Union Station Trust
--NE2 23:49, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible common carriers
Talk:Wim Kok

message: I agree that allegations about Kok and the PvdA somehow being responsible for the Fortuyn assassination are unjustified. I would even go as far as to say that they are malicious. Yet, I'm a bit uneasy with the words "confused masses." Anyone else have an opinion? 213.84.239.37 20:31, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Willem Kok" doesn't redirect to this page. Could someone please add that? Salopian (talk) 16:10, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Willem Kok

message: The intro delivered more facts than the story below it. I've reworked it, so that it reads without any doubles. Regards,Jeff5102 (talk) 08:00, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: And the long intro is back. Now the article tells the same story twice. Once with, and once without sub-headers. What is the point of that?Jeff5102 (talk) 10:18, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, again: would anyone object if I cut down the intro, so that this article will stop telling the same story twice? Otherwise I'll work on it.Jeff5102 (talk) 10:22, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  rework 

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 05:39, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 

message: Wim Kok was never called "Wim Kok IV" by anyone. Even the reference for it mentions him as "Willem Kok" without any roman number added. I'll wait for two weeks to see any sound argument. If not, I'll rework it together with all the double information in this article.Jeff5102 (talk) 12:39, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wim Kok IV? 
Talk:Simon Cowell

message: Remove self-link (there's also another in the Bibliography section), and add a thin space to differentiate the ellipsis and the period. 2603:8001:4542:28FB:FCEE:5E7F:164D:BDB4 (talk) 21:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: --Ferien (talk) 21:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 April 2024 

message: Under 'Early Life', change Ascot to Slough. Licensed Victualler's School did not move from Slough to Ascot until 1989, many years after Simon left (was expelled). 82.41.211.157 (talk) 11:02, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. M.Bitton (talk) 13:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 May 2024
Talk:Field artillery

message: There's got to be a sweet pic of some artillery out there.  In fact, I have some military frieds - what would be the processes of including a picture they might have taken in Iraq?  uriah923(talk) 20:45, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

message: What about the Artillery Recce team? This team evaluates proposed gun positions,surveys the gun position prior to the arrival of the battery, and then passes "line" to each gun when the battery arrives.
Motorfix 13:56, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Artillery Recce

message: This section seems to be based on the organisation of US artillery units, yet it seems to imply that all armies worldwide have the same organisation. There needs to be some inclusion of other armies' methods of organisation, or at least a statement about which army the description is based upon. Dallas 23:24, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Field artillery team - fire direction centre

message: This article should be renamed US Field Artillery.  If a general item about field artillery is required (doubtful, see artillery, indirect fire, artillery battery) then it needs to be written in more general terms.  As written this article doesn't even apply to other NATO field artilleries, never mind the wider world.
Incidentally, a sure sign that an author doesn't know what they are talking about is when they state that mils and milliradians are the same thing!
Alexander of Macedon used artillery to support troops in the field but there are no photos surviving (ref Plutarch's Life). The Romans didn't leave photos of their field artillery either, but there are some good reconstructions.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.171.129.71 (talk) 02:03, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: General Coment

message: There is a photo captioned, "French Napoleonic artillery battery. Photo taken during the 200th anniversary reenactment of the battle of Austerlitz in 1805." While the battle may have taken place in 1805, the caption suggests the reenactment took place in 1805. Replacing the word 'in' with the word 'of' would make the caption less confusing. 
There is also a question of whether the first sentence labeling reenactors as a 'French Napoleonic artillery battery' should also be changed, as reenactors clearly aren't the real thing, even if it's subsequently called a reenactment. I guess it isn't likely people will think there was color photography during the Napoleonic wars, but an encyclopedia should strive for accuracy in what it presents. 
Finally, is the Battle of Austerlitz important enough that it should be considered a proper or historical name and have the word 'battle' capitalized? 
99.24.219.211 (talk) 01:20, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo caption clarification
Category talk:Computer science

message: Currently, Computer Science is a sub-category of Information Science and Information Science is a sub-category of Computer Science.
Dfletter 18:41, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

message: Why is :Category:Computer science a sub-category of :Category:Information technology?  IT and CS are fairly disjoint fields, and I don't think it's really appropriate to claim that either is subsumed by the other.  It may be appropriate for certain sub-categories to be listed in both, but I don't think the main category should be.  --bmills 17:11, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps for the same reason that Portal:Computer science points at Portal:Information technology?. Anyway, I agree that CS shouldn't be a sub-cat of IT. I've just removed :Category:Computer science from :Category:Information technology. --Allan McInnes (talk) 17:47, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information Technology
Talk:List of South African mass media

message: I suggest merging Newspapers_in_South_Africa into this article. This article is currently much more complete. If it ever gets to the stage where the newspapers section warrants a separate article it can be split off again, but at the moment the newspaper article is embarassing in comparison to this one, and it's just double the work to maintain links to newspapers etc. Greenman 16:38, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested merge

message: WHOEVER said that RAPPORT is not available in KwaZulu Natal should have his head read. Ever since inception it has been available ALL OVER South Africa. 156.8.251.250 (talk) 19:46, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  RAPPORT 
Talk:Talduwe Somarama

message: Should n't the event of assasination be moved to a different page? Chirags 20:59, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Macclesfield (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I assume that before 1880 Macclesfield had 2 MPs. It may be clearer to represent this whole list in another way, maybe in a table or something? Is there a suitable template?
JMiall 21:00, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Grammar checker

message: There should be a page called Writer's Workbench so I put in the link. This has the sound of a very common name though... Anyway I was able to find a neat article from '87 reviewing it (http://computersandcomposition.osu.edu/archives/v1/1_2_html/1_2_2_Harris.html), it was invented at Bell Labs, we could have a nice stub article. But I'm not sure if the somewhat similar product WWB 8.16 is actually descended from the original? Also their is a Debian package of the 'diction' component still available.
68.188.164.248 (talk) 18:46, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:Not a forum. Are you suggesting this for the Article, and can you find a source that confirms this to be not necessarily unique to you? The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 18:35, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: While the grammar checkers that I've used have been very poor at detecting grammatical errors, I have found them very useful for detecting typos that a spell checker cannot catch.
I don't know how common this, but I have a problem that when I type something that's in my head, some of the words do not make it into the document. My fingers seem to randomly lose words in the transmission. I have found the grammar checkers that I've used to be outstanding with this class of errors.
However, I can use these grammar checkers only because I have an excellent command of grammar. I would not recommend using one to people who don't.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bostoner (talk • contribs) 22:01, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:Not a forum. Are you suggesting this for the Article, and can you find a source that confirms this to be not necessarily unique to you? The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 18:35, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Use for Even Today's Poor Grammar Checkers 

message: I just deleted a previous comment that had nothing to do with grammar checkers. It was an ad for a mortgage company by someone who signed his name "Jim Grabowy." Bostoner (talk) 00:44, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted Spam 

message: I dont know if this is entirely appropriate but I want to warn people that there are spelling checkers that install trojans on your computer (scamware), so please do a background check before you download one Feraudyh (talk) 11:51, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scamware 

message: Given that most of the commentary here and citations in the entry are well over a decade old combined with the fact that the technology in recent years has made significant advances, I would hope to see this entry updated. There is a need for it.  Silas10961 (talk) 21:04, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update