Talk:Partnership for Peace

message: Serbia is a new member since today,it should be on the front page of Wikipedia,and this article is to be changed.I would like to do that,but I am too lazy to look for links,but it is very important to change front page of Wikipedia and add this as one of the most important news.Thank you
YXYX 16:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are misinfomred. First of all, Serbia is not the only one invited (Montenegro and Bosnia-Herzegovina were too), second of all, as it is completely insignificant for the rest of the world it shouldn't be on the front page, and finally, it is still NOT a member, as it didn't sign the agreement. This is, of course, a formality, but a serious encyclopedia should treat formalities with outmost care. Regards. <anon>
How can it be insignificant??? Are you crazy,if you look on the front page,whenever there are elections in some socialist or communist country that is on the front page.
Now there is a new country in Partnership for Peace(which is more important then some communist elections),that doesnt happen every day,so it should be on the front page,since it is a very important event.
YXYX 11:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Socialist and communist states do by definition not have elections, so your claim is nonsensical to the extreme. Go bother someone else. —Nightstallion (?) 19:49, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New member - Nov 2006 - Serbia ? - 

message: Here are the main changes I have made:
*I have expanded the intro to include Malta and why it left.
*The dates each PfP member signed the Partnership document are in full.
*References!
*Integrated Montenegro, Serbia, and BiH's invites to PfP in the article.
*Updated map; might try a crack at an SVG.
- Thanks, Hoshie 13:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes in my last edit 

message: Are the USA,Canada etc. not member of PFP or why arent they coloured?But if yes, why are Poland and all the new members coloured?--84.161.68.31 (talk) 11:42, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: PfP is a NATO programme for non-NATO countries.  Therefore, only non-NATO countries can belong to it.  Green coloured countries are former members of PfP; they ceased to belong to PfP when they joined NATO.--Gorpik (talk) 12:21, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: This article lists only the membership/-history, but doesn't give any information about membership requirements or meaning besides "creating trust" with NATO. Is being a member of PfP really only a "I want to publicly declare that I like NATO and/or peace" checkbox for countries or are there any real obligations? As-is, the article is not helpful at all for understanding the PfP. 46.115.156.195 (talk) 22:02, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I started the "Activities" section to fill this gap. Could still use some expansion. -- Beland (talk) 16:13, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning 

message: The article doesnt say anything regarding the fact that PfP membership had given rise to a certain amount of controversy in some countries (e.g. Ireland)  2.123.243.237 (talk) 19:56, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy

message: The wording is unidiomatic and the society needs a reference.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.67.191.234 (talk) 13:33, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: the Bulgarian Society Novae

message: Does this mean that this part of the article is out of date?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.67.191.234 (talk) 13:47, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: The winner of Cyprus' presidential election in February 2013, Nicos Anastasiades

message: This article needs urgent update: surely the Russo-Ukrainian War raises questions about this Partnership for Peace. -ELEKHHT 13:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: ''War and Peace''

message: Since French is co-official alongside English in NATO, I thought about the inclusion of the French name. I don't feel bold enough to edit this, so I figured that I would discuss it first. Caehlla2357 (talk) 03:31, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of French name 

message: https://www.nato.int/structur/nmlo/links/yavoriv-training-centre.pdf --31.144.193.145 (talk) 13:18, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ukraine is also in 

message: What is the status of the PfP now? It does not seem to be working. 2601:647:5800:3B60:4462:E45D:493C:359 (talk) 04:37, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Russian invasion of Ukraine

message: Please edit the image of countries in Europe in relation to the PfP membership. FanofMultimedia123 (talk) 13:08, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finland joined NATO