Talk:Jerome, Arizona

message: This latest edit, by 66.82.9.104, needs a rewrite to remove the promotional tone -- it reads like a Chmaber of Commerce puff-piece now. Cheers -- Pete Tillman (talk) 02:28, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, with general cleanup and some new info added. Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 06:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tourism and art

message: I'm confused by the many variety of uses of the term "United Verde", and am wondering if someone can please clarify this either here or in the various articles that mention these. Varieties I've seen include:
* United Verde
* United Verde Mine
::United Verde refers to the bigger of the two mines at Jerome; it also is shorthand for the company that owned the mine and for infrastructure associated with that particular mine; for example, the United Verde and Pacific Railway. Finetooth (talk) 19:29, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, horribly confusing. Good catch. I forgot to fix the redirects after greatly expanding the Jerome article. I've now redirected them more sensibly, I hope. Finetooth (talk) 19:29, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: United Verde mine now redirects to Jerome, Arizona#History and United Verde Extension to Jerome, Arizona#Early 20th century. Finetooth (talk) 19:37, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

text: Correct. UVX can be used as a shorthand for the mine or the company that owned the mine, or as an adjective describing infrastructure associated with that particular mine; for example the UVX smelter at Clemenceau. Finetooth (talk) 19:29, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

text: This short list seems to have been created by someone in hopes that the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) sites related to the UVX would eventually have articles of their own. I added a couple of words to the lead sentence in hopes of making it a bit more clear. Finetooth (talk) 19:29, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

text: The further confusion, which I hope the Geology section makes clear, is that the two mines were not two parts of the same mine or the same ore body even though their names seem to imply that they were. They were two fabulously rich but separate deposits. Thank you for pointing out these confusions. I hope I have cleared them up, but if you see anything else amiss or have further suggestions, we can certainly make further adjustments. Finetooth (talk) 19:29, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This looks pretty good, I think it solves the confusion I had. Thanks! djr13 (talk) 01:25, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  United Verde? 

message: I am nominating this article for Good status on behalf of User:Finetooth, who did a fine expansion job. FT does not wish to guide the article through formal review processes. I had no part in conducting research for, or expanding, this article but I am happy to address concerns that may arise during the review process. Thanks. --Another Believer (Talk) 05:25, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article nomination 

message: This line makes no sense: "Males had a median income of $23,750 versus $23,750 for females."  If they're exactly the same it's not "versus" anything, and I can't find this on the linked census info page.  Can anyone clarify? JamesG5 (talk) 19:05, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for catching this. The stats were added by robots after the 2000 census and again after the 2010 census, then later modified by humans who probably thought that the two sets of similar robot stats included too much detail. The male/female claim that you noticed makes no sense to me either; it may be a typo. I simplified and modified the claims, citing the Census Bureau's American FactFinder tables for Jerome in 2014. To get at these stats about Jerome, key "Jerome town, Arizona" into the FactFinder search engine. That will take you to a page with a lot of other clickable options related to Jerome. The "Income" choice in the menu on the left side has the median income stat, and the "Selected Economic Characteristics" has the poverty stat. There are many more stats for Jerome; I'm not sure which, if any, are important enough to include in a general encyclopedia article. Finetooth (talk) 22:00, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Appreciate the fix! JamesG5 (talk) 04:34, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Median income? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jerome, Arizona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130412144103/http://www.geotimes.org/jan07/Travels0107.html to http://www.geotimes.org/jan07/Travels0107.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:26, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Need to update  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.80.132 (talk) 01:56, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. Updated. A further update will be needed after the November elections. Finetooth (talk) 17:13, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

text: Slight mistake. You put John Kyl but he died in 73. It's actually Jon Kyl  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.80.132 (talk) 21:10, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

text: I updated it for you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.80.132 (talk) 21:12, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update Mccain info on page 

message: I have no objection to adding the Köppen climate classification to the article, but the claim that the correct classification is Csa needs an inline citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia is not a reliable source for itself, and the Köppen climate classification page, though interesting and informative, can't be the RS for the Csa claim. Furthermore, I don't think Csa is the correct classification. When I look at the graphic at the top of the Köppen climate classification page, it appears to me that Jerome, which lies east of the Sierra Nevada is in a B region rather than a C region. Weatherbase says the correct classification is BSk (Tropical and Subtropical Steppe Climate). If you agree, let me know, and I'll add this correction as well as an inline citation to Weatherbase. If you have a better source, please let me know. Finetooth (talk) 03:18, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Köppen climate classification  

message: does anyone else feel this article needs at least some updating? Town's water report should be updated, sliding jail needs an update, economy and culture needs an update, median income could be updated if it's available. Therapyisgood (talk) 16:06, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  update