lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:University of Birmingham Medical School

message: Wow... first section to the talk page - may not get a response for a while! Anyway:
I think this article could do with little reorganisation. At the moment it is composed of the standard wikipedia-style introduction text (which isn't too bad actually) a history section (which is adequate) and a modern day section.
*The introduction is quite good, although I think the Head of College and the Dean of Medicine should get a specific mention here, in addition the the side-box information. I may add that tonight if I have time, although I try not to edit pages without a talk page discussion first.
*I think the history section is adequate - it contains the major landmarks of the medical school's past in a chronological order. I suggest a 'Notable Alumni' section or subsection to append to the existing text, and possibly a 'Notable Staff' section. I seem to remember a number of commemorative 'blue plaques' on the front of the school, so these should get a mention. Major discoveries and developments that were found by research staff could go there too. (For example, I think the discoverer of the dystrophin gene/protein is an old student?)
*The final section 'About the Medical School today' is a bit of catch-all for other, more modern information. It states the current building, grades and other application requirements (although not together: the grade requirements and mention of the UKCAT are in different paragraphs. This needs addressing) along with other course information. The middle of this section reads like an excerpt from the university prospectus, and I think it has an inappropriate tone for an encyclopaedia. Also of note is that the normal format of a institution's page is something along the lines of:
**intro
**history (up to modern times)
**modern organisation (in greater detail than history section)
**reputation and standing in tables
**different courses (and application info)
**library and other notable resources
**notable alumni and staff
**affiliations in UK and abroad (other schools/societies)
This is how I think the page should end up being organised.
Of course, any suggestions/contributions are welcome - just add a reply!
Esoteric cybernetic (talk) 23:26, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganisation of article 
Talk:American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

message: While doing some work on Types of abortion restrictions in the United States I came across "The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Evolution of Abortion Policy, 1951–1973: The Politics of Science", a 2003 article on ACOG's history and politics from the American Journal of Public Health. It looks like it might be a good source to help expand this article. Matt Fitzpatrick (talk) 11:15, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Found source
Talk:Inova Health System

message: I looked up this article, and it contains less info that the inova web site. 
After six calls with repeated admonishments to call other phone numbers, I ended up in a voice message service.
Inova apparently gives low priority to useful communication.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.252.29.60 (talk) 17:53, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ad with little useful information or balance. 

message: I created the history section of this article with links to all of the 5 hospitals Inova operates, but it may be more appropriate to include some of them, such as Mount Vernon and Fair Oaks, within the article itself.--Chuckhoffmann (talk) 03:18, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to Hospital Articles
Talk:Diseases Database

message: sexally gave to  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.117.184.112 (talk) 21:22, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: '''
Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server error '80040e10'
Procedure or function 'wqryHitRecordLite4' expects parameter '@CumulativeHitCount', which was not supplied.
/inc_constants.asp, line 508 
'''
Linuxo (talk) 08:39, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Site is down
Talk:Mount Sinai School of Medicine

message: Whoever edited the MSSM article should be commended; however, please adhere to the guidelines on how to write these types of articles.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:UNIGUIDE
Also, I removed material that has no sources. If you want to rewrite the material, please make sure you are able to verify it with referencesOmnis7 (talk) 04:47, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing the MSSMAarticle
Talk:H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute

message: Whomever keeps editing this page:  you need to realize two things:  Moffitt is on the map today due to the efforts of the individuals mentioned that you keep deleting AND it is not part of the University of South Florida.
I like rice.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.91.195.117 (talk) 20:26, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A lot of the material on this page reads like it was copied verbatim from a PR site or an advert.  This is not encyclopedic or apporopriate to Wikipedia. I have trimmed much of this material out but more eyes should get on this.Simonm223 (talk) 15:37, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I would like to read more about the Moffitt Cancer Center's partnership with Shands and the University of Florida. NorwalkJames (talk) 22:36, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And if more can be found on that subject that is properly sourced from secondary sources, neutral in point of view and of encyclopedic scope I would not block its inclusion. What I removed ammounted to essentially a cluster of empty adjectives. WP:Weasel exists for a reason.Simonm223 (talk) 11:30, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The bit about the university of florida reads like ad text and thus is deleted, again.Simonm223 (talk) 15:00, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia is not for advertising 

message: * More information should be provided about the affiliation with the University of Florida. Jccort (talk) 20:05, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Improving the Article
Talk:School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester

message: The box says Academic Division of Medicine & Surgery (Formerly the School of Medicine). The School of Medicine website (accessed today) says School of medicine, and the university is deivided in to faculties and the faculties in to schools. Where does this "academic division" come from?Billlion 19:33, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh dear, what about a bit of clarity here?  Catherine Chisholm cannot have been the first medical student, surely the first female medical student.  And the link to Stopford leads to a rugby league football player, not the famous anatomist and medical peer.  Is this article being written by people who do not know what they are doing?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.62.91.38 (talk) 21:04, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Academic Division  

message: The School of Medicine doesn't strictly exist anymore, at least not in its current wiki format. The Faculty of Medical and Human sciences and The Faculty of Life Sciences have merged (as of August 2016) to form The Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health. The School of Medicine therefore changed to a broader, School of Medical Sciences. I made simple edits to reflect this, but was told to 'refrain from making unconstructive changes'. Please explain what is wrong in keeping this page up to date. Koryjstout (talk) 08:57, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe this article should refer to the School of Medical Sciences. The changes you made are relevant for University_of_Manchester_Faculty_Biology,_Medicine_and_Health. PriceDL (talk) 15:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faculty no longer exists  

message: The printed library catalogue is the basis for this Commons item.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 13:14, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Library catalogue
Talk:American Academy of Nursing

message: The entire concept here is overall generally pathetic.
Blondesareeasy (talk) 06:24, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Shyness Clinic

message: I think that you should add more details about what went on in the study. What are some examples of cognitive traits? What type of treatments are available? There is a lot of interesting information that you could add onto this article. --Daniellesummers (talk) 20:05, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  improving the article 

message: For this article I would consider adding more background information and also explaining more in depth about the relevance of the "Shyness Clinic". More references could be helpful also. K.Fox456 (talk) 15:19, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to improve
Talk:Endocrine Society

message: It has more than 18,000 members from over 122 countries in medicine, molecular and cellular biology, biochemistry, physiology, genetics, immunology, education, industry, and allied health. 
Annual Meetings have been held since 1916 except in 1943 and 1945 during World War II when meetings were cancelled at the request of the United States government and in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 
Publications[edit]
The Endocrine Society publishes the following journals:
•	Endocrine Reviews
•	Endocrinology
•	Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
•	Journal of the Endocrine Society 
Key people
Gary D. Hammer, MD, PhD - President
E. Dale Abel, MD, PhD - Past President
Carol H. Wysham, MD - President-Elect
Dolores M. Shoback, MD - Secretary-Treasurer
Jgingeryendo (talk) 14:05, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  May 2020
Talk:Am I a Hindu?

message: its great!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.108.101.232 (talk) 09:56, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  this book is great
Talk:Maharashtra Association of Resident Doctors

message: Hi! I stumbled upon this page and I was trying to make it more understandable but I don't know enough about medicine to understand where corrections should be made. For example the following sentence doesn't make any sense as I read it, but I don't know how to fix it as I don't know what the requirements are for different residents.
"Resident doctors are the ones who have completed their MBBS – Junior residents and who have completed their postgraduation – Senior Residents."
To be honest, I'm new to Wikipedia and don't fully know how this works, but I was hoping by making this topic it might reach someone who could help this page!
Thanks!!
SlingingShutter (talk) 06:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @SlingingShutter I assume it means "Resident doctors are the ones who have completed their MBBS (Junior residents) and who have completed their postgraduation (Senior Residents)." But without any references to check, it's hard to be sure. Hopefully someone from WP:MED will come by to sort out references/notability now that it's tagged. -- asilvering (talk) 07:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you!! I think that's a good assumption but I will not touch it and hope someone else with better understanding fixes it.  SlingingShutter (talk) 07:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar Help
Talk:EUROCAT (medicine)

message: Someone should undo that last change (perhaps I will).  Eurocat really is related to Thales air traffic management systems - and that's what I was expecting to find.  68.29.255.246 (talk) 03:40, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was the author of that stub sentence and it was apparently removed by an admin. I have doubts about how well informed he was about the significance of the Eurocat system within the aviation industry, and he surely didn't leave any comment in the discussion page about the action (as any good wikipedian should do). I surely object to the removal and I second you.CW (talk) 14:05, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Created dedicated page for Eurocat (Air Traffic Management System). Not sure how to create a disambiguation page. CW (talk) 14:16, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partition to have the Thales ATM product stub restored
Talk:Ruby Hall Clinic

message: *Object to deletion of article. The article looks very poor but the subject is notable enough. Please go through this http://rubyhall.com/introduction. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 14:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the clinic's website. That merely confirms that they exist. For a subject to be notable, we need evidence that independent, 3rd party sources have talked about it. However, you are welcome to remove the PROD tag; if you do, I'll start an articles for deletion discussion.  Qwyrxian (talk) 16:01, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If thats the way we wanna do it, we can do that. I though you would be satisfied by reading the importance that the hospital has in Pune. Meanwhile i will try & get in more references.-Animeshkulkarni (talk) 17:00, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the sources you've added, I'm willing to believe the hospital is notable, or very close at the least.  No AfD from me. Thank you for the improvements!  Qwyrxian (talk) 03:29, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of article 

message: The Controversies section CANNOT name, for legal reasons, doctors who have only been accused by families but not found guilty, or legal cases where hospital has not been found guilty. Please either update the cases with their outcome or delete them. kashmiri TALK 00:13, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies?
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Amir Massoud Tofangsazan (second nomination)

message: Well, this is going to sound tiresome, but can I suggest a team of two or three admins close this one? The discussion looks a lot like it did in the last AfD round, and I don't want this going back to DRV again. Kla'quot 08:12, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:American Speech–Language–Hearing Association

message: The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) disputes the repeated edits made to this Wikipedia entry by Jmark2001 because the additions made by this user violate the following sections of Wikipedia's guidelines:
 
1) “All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view. This means representing fairly, proportionately, and as far as possible without bias, all significant views that have been published by reliable sources. This is non-negotiable and expected of all articles and all editors.” The edits added by Jmark2001 are biased and subjective rather than factual. While Jmark2001 is entitled to his own points of view, his ASHA entries on Wikipedia are not the appropriate venue upon which he should express those points of view.
 
2) Wikipedia's guidelines state that personal blogs are “largely not acceptable as sources.” The guidelines go on to say, “Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, then claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason self-published media—including but not limited to books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, personal or group blogs, Internet forum postings, and tweets—are largely not acceptable.” Jmark2001 inserted 10 links to his own personal blog from ASHA's entry. These are not acceptable sources per Wikipedia's guidelines.
 
3) Wikipedia's guidelines don't allow questionable sources of information: “Such sources include websites and publications expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, or promotional, or which rely heavily on rumor and personal opinion.” Jmark2001's personal blog certainly falls into this category.
 
ASHA requests that Jmark2001 refrain from continuing to editorialize ASHA's Wikipedia listing with his own personal opinions and links to his personal blog.
 
Martin J. Rome
Chief Staff Officer for Communications
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Mrome (talk) 12:36, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Council for Academic Accreditation in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology operates under the auspices of the American Speech–Language–Hearing Association. It has little independent notability, and despite the rambling description in the Council's article, its activities can be summarized in very few sentences. Recommend merging the two articles. 69.183.117.113 (talk) 04:34, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:University of Vermont Medical Center

message: An editor just deleted a footnoted sentence relating to the number of support personnel "because it didn't include nurses." What is missing from the article is the presence of anything resembling a budget or staffing. There is nothing to substantiate why  hospital costs are around $1,000/day for "normal" care and $3,000-$8,000/day for ICU. Would the deleting editor like to supply any of that? Student7 (talk) 17:47, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Staff, Money

message: Will someone please reformat the image correctly. I put it in but am unsure how to proceed from here. Jakebarrington (talk) 20:07, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reformatting 
Talk:American Board of Medical Specialties

message: FTA:
:The American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) is a non-profit physician-led umbrella organization for 24 of the 26 approved medical specialty boards in the United States.
So which are the other two? 95.89.154.146 (talk) 18:45, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: So which are the others?

message: It is of note that the American Osteopathic Association and the American Board of Osteopathic Specialties and the United States Government recognizes Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine as a specialty while the American Board of Medical Specialties does not. Similarly, the American Board of Physician Specialties and the United States Governement recognizes Disaster Medicine as a specialty while the American Board of Medical Specialties does not. This means that there are 26 recognized medical specialties in the United States. I believe that it is important to include:
"24 of 26 recognized specialties"
to acknowledge that ABMS is not an all inclusive source of certification or the sole authority in the United States. I defer to the group to decide if the change is to be retained to include this acknowledgement. Renaissancedoc (talk) 01:29, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hasn't Sleep medicine recently been added as a specialty or sub-specialty in the USA? Should it be mentioned in this article? Thanks. --Hordaland (talk) 23:26, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance of completeness 

message: Is there a uniform or accepted way of writing Board Certification as a compound adjective? I mostly see it spelled as "Board Certified physician" but shouldn't it read "board-certified physician" as a hyphenated adjective? Cheers, Mabuse 21:30, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling? 

message: Being board certified is highly anticompetitive ... why has there not been a competitor to the ABMS? 130.91.98.31 (talk) 07:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monopoly/Antitrust Issues 

message: I reverted some recent edits which claimed there is no evidence that board certified physicians lead to better outcomes, but a simple search revealed several papers which study this claim. In general though this article needs a lot more references. --KarlB (talk) 20:12, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  reverted edits 

message: Eleven of the 24 specialties are shown without links. Articles on each of those boards are needed. --DThomsen8 (talk) 00:17, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles on particular specialty boards needed
Talk:Hilal Ahmar

message: O 185.27.216.251 (talk) 16:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello how are you
Talk:Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services

message: CAMHS services:
A  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.101.142.141 (talk) 14:19, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

message: — Assignment last updated by Shaan18k (talk) 21:55, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Intro to Psychology
Talk:Aberdeen Royal Infirmary

message: I heard in 1978 that the (then fairly new) coronary care unit, which had been funded by a private donation, had been accepted with poor grace by the hospital board, which had insisted on using one half of the circular ward as a surgical day unit (the surgery taking place in the main hospital): as a result the CCU had to operate an upper age limit of 65 years. I saw nothing in print about this, but it was in keeping with the Medical School's having a strong Health Economics Unit. NRPanikker (talk) 16:03, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coronary Care Unit
Talk:International Society of Blood Transfusion

message: اثبتت الدراسات المتقدمه ان التبرع بالدم له الاثر الايجابى للتخلص من الوزن الزائد ونقصان  نسبة الشحوم الزائبه فى الدم لذلك كان له الاثر فى صحه الانجاب خصوصا النساء  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.209.79.63 (talk) 08:13, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is wikipedia in English. You are welcome to contribute in other languages in the respective projects but in every project please stick to the language that everyone can understand there. Furthermore, automatic translation gives the following for what you wrote: "Blood donation - Advanced studies have shown that blood donation has the positive effect of eliminating excess weight and decreasing the proportion of excess fat in the blood. This has had an effect on reproductive health, especially women" This is the discussion about an encyclopedic article. I don't see how what you seem to have written could contribute in this respect. Crotopaxi (talk) 15:05, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  التبرع بالدم  

message: I agree with the complaint that there is too much detail. I suggest to delete all the prizes unless it can be shown that they are prominently mentioned elsewhere than in the organisation's publications. I also don't see why there should be several paragraphs about different parts of the history. To me only contributions of significance for society as a whole seem relevant, and they should be verifiable with sources independent of the subject. Crotopaxi (talk) 15:05, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I also agree that there is too much detail. Perhaps I am missing something, but I don't see why the history section should focus so much on where the central office goes. The review of the history of the ISBT written by H E Heier has a lot of interesting details to be written about that are more significant and interesting to society than the location of the central office. Manyyassin (talk) 06:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Overly detailed
Talk:United Indians of All Tribes

message: I have now taken this from a stub to a good starter article. There is considerable potential for expansion using the materials found in the external links. - Jmabel | Talk 08:19, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Considerable potential for expansion

message: This article says Indians of All Tribes was founded in 1970, but the Alcatraz article says the 1969 occupation of that Island was done by people working under the same name. Are the two groups not connected? - 70.71.154.237 01:57, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  founding? 
Talk:DOCARE

message: All early sources give Dr. Allaby's middle initial as "E," including the 1930 Montana census and his 1939 commencment listing.  150.243.14.35 (talk) 18:00, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  founder 
Talk:American College of Psychiatrists

message: This article doesn't have any independent sources to presume its notability and it doesn't have any significant coverage over the topic. Content currently covered can be included in other articles. -Jahnx (talk) 11:27, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed for deletion
Talk:Mount Scott (Klamath County, Oregon)

message: I'm in the middle of testing User:DYKadminBot for a known bug when trying to edit articles with ()'s in the title. I am using this talk page as a testbed for the changes. So... please don't mind if I have to do a few reverts here. (This article is on the next queue to go live btw). —— nixeagleemail me 06:50, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot tests: