Talk:Pernambuco

message: WIKI that not all of Pernambuco is on GMT -3, but the Special Municipality of Fernando da Noronha is on GMT -2. Right? Muhamedmesic 12:05, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: Someone has vandalized several parts of this and other wikipedia entries about Brazil.  Among many other things, references to the "Dutch" were replaced by references to the "Baiano."  For examples, the Dutch West Indies Company became the Baiano West Islands Company.  There are several other problems now along the article.  I tried to fix them, but was not able to.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariobrazil2 (talk • contribs) 18:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalization 

message: The portuguese alternate to this website is more complete and should be translated to inslude as many, in not the same, topics.67.161.243.240 16:36, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: is only for protected pages. Cheers. --MZMcBride 03:27, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portuguese to English 

message: The intro certainly sounds like an advert for Pernambuco, with its great beaches and cultural life! These claims need refs... Benjamin 23:24, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - the intro is fatally weak.  It's supposed to be a concise summary (one or two sentences per section) of the article.  Nothing can be mentioned here for the first time.  It hardly matters, for example, which states border it.Sbalfour (talk) 01:20, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV? 

message: *A mention of the indigenous people, the Xucuru. --Jerome Potts (talk) 07:01, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing data 

message: I disagree, the upside down r or rhotic r (e.g. present in American/US English) is not so common in Pernambuco(but in rural Sao Paulo yes!) , the r there is either aspirated (as in not pronounced) or the r used in Spanish before a consonant.Domsta333 (talk) 14:25, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation of Pernambuco 

message: The History section is cut-and-pasted from other articles, and hardly makes sense. I'd be embarrassed.  This needs a rewrite.Sbalfour (talk) 01:07, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section is patchwork 

message: There is a discrepancy regarding the title of the „second oldest city in Brazil”. In this article is written: „In 1982 the city of Olinda, the second oldest city in Brazil, was declared a World Heritage Site by UNESCO.” However, on the Wikipedia's List of cities in the Americas by year of foundation, as „Second Oldest City in Brazil” is mentioned „Cananéia” (1533).
Which is the right one?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Micron rt (talk • contribs) 11:12, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  discrepancy 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Pernambuco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070729101716/http://www.suape.pe.gov.br/MOV_ESTATISTICAS.ASP?tabela=5 to http://www.suape.pe.gov.br/mov_estatisticas.ASP?tabela=5
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:04, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Pernambuco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120222015816/http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/economia/ppm/2007/ppm2007.pdf to http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/economia/ppm/2007/ppm2007.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120222015929/http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/economia/pam/2002/pam2002.pdf to http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/economia/pam/2002/pam2002.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304001818/http://www.ibge.com.br/home/estatistica/economia/pibmunicipios/2003_2007/tab01.pdf to http://www.ibge.com.br/home/estatistica/economia/pibmunicipios/2003_2007/tab01.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:20, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pernambuco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091014095018/http://www.cbf.com.br/ranking/ranking_uf.pdf to http://www.cbf.com.br/ranking/ranking_uf.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:32, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hi, I'm new, feeling my way along. I have made a couple of starts first on the Pernambuco article in the History section, then thinking that I should really be working on the History of Pernambuco article, I switched my effort there. I posted a note on that talk page several days ago thinking that there was a team watching over it. Since I haven't heard any feedback, I thought I'd post here. I expect to be porceeding at a leisurely pace with editing the History of Pernambuco article at least up through 1654. I'd be pleased to get any guidance you might have to offer.P2dwight (talk) 21:15, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing in [[Pernambuco]] and [[History of Pernambuco]] 

message: This note is largely an equivilent of the note I have put on the talk page for History of Pernambuco page. I am not editing the section of the same name on this article as yet.  Though I expect to get there someday. So here's the note.
Having edited up thru the Portuguese arrival and precolonial section with no one making any comments on the talk page, I conclude that no one is currently following that talk page, at least not frequently. So it seems good to me to proceed to update the section on the Colonial Period:the Captaincy of Pernambuco. I note that the article on Captaincy of Pernambuco has some good material but only 3 references, so I feel free to treat from 1534 to 1630 as I see fit.  I will put a note on the talk page for the main article for the Captaincy of Pernambuco. I have looked at the material that follows and expect that I will proceed later with the Dutch Period. Although since the Dutch Brazil article does have a lot of references, I may proceed somewhat differently, I'm not sure. Past the Dutch Period I consider what little expertise I have exhausted, so I do not intend to go forward, or at least not until I would have done some reading. I am also going to dink a bit with some of the comments. I consider some of them wholly wrong (e.g. the coffee comment) and some less than optimally placed in the article. I have also placed a note somewhat like this on the History of Pernambuco talk page. P2dwight (talk) 12:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  beginning edit of the early colonial period (1534 to 1630) on the History of Brazil page 

message: I had imagined I was going to return here (this article is where I first started) after going off and editing the History of Pernambuco article and the Captaincy of Pernambuco article and shorten this History section considerably. I had completely forgotten that note about this section/article having omitted however many hundred years and needing to cover that. So I did take out a few things and sometimes put them in the other two articles. However, the history section is now longer than it wss when I started. I am still a newby at this editing of Wikipedia, so while I have noted little interest in Pernambuco over the last several months of editing, I am quite agreeable to guidance if anyone feels up to it.P2dwight (talk) 04:12, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  updating the History section 

message: Here's one fairly disturbing development: https://bitterwinter.org/brazil-law-introduced-in-pernambuco-would-forbid-altering-the-bible/
Thanks for reading. -- Apisite (talk) 02:40, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Law Introduced in Pernambuco Would Forbid “Altering” the Bible