Talk:Acura Integra

message: Move request fulfilled. Rob Church Talk 20:03, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Outcome

message: Would anyone dissapprove of adding sections for each model year. Such as 1993 Acura Integra, 1994 Acura Integra, etc. I've got some model year specific pictures, but I don't think they would add interest to this page. They would also enable people who have knowledge about their year to submit it. Thanks, Clint
:The only time more than one picture is justified for a single generation of any car would be for a facelift (i.e., the '98 Integras vs. the '94-'97s). Though that would be worth having pictures of. RobertM525 07:18, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion 

message: I don't think it is relevant to detail each year. There were minimal changes from year to year, usually just colors. The Integra was made from 1986-2001, so that would simply be far too many subsections.
Thegsrguy 16:57, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year break-down 

message: Is a base-model sedan really the best representation of the 3rd generation Integra? Wouldn't a coupe--which was far more popular--be more appropriate? And a GS-R at that, as it was the best "mortal" :) version of the Integra. I've got a '98 Integra GS-R, and I'll gladly put up a picture of it for our 3rd generation photo if no one disagrees. (Fully stock, of course.) RobertM525 06:34, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd generation picture 

message: Like the CL was positioned between the Integra and the TL, the TSX would be positioned beween the Civic-based CSX (replaces Civic-based RSX and EL) and the TL. So looks like the TSX's only predecessor was the CL.  Compare an '03 CL with an '04 TSX.  According to MSN Autos, the TSX is more expensive than a CL.  The Integra's only successor is the RSX, because it is Civic-based.  CL was longer than a TSX, but it was a coupe version of the TL.  -- Bull-Doser 19:33, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This may come as a shock to your philosophy, but not everything has a predecessor. IFCAR 19:54, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason Why TSX Didn't Replace Integra Sedan 

message: The main image, a blurry photo of a first generation sedan, seems a bit inappropriate. First, because the picture quality stinks. Second, because I would say the iconic generation of the Integra was the third one and, thus, if we were to have a main picture for all of the Integra, I would say the 3rd generation would be the most appropriate. RobertM525 19:08, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems reasonable. Keep the 1st-gen 4-door somewhere in the article though, it's the only one I know of on Wikipedia. There should be some 3rd-gen Integras in the Commons if you want to switch it out. IFCAR 00:44, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main image? 

message: I strongly suggest merging these two pages as they represent identical cars, no reason to have two pages especially considering the quality of the Acura page compared to the Honda page
:I agree. Zilog Jones 19:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The only question is which page should be the redirect and which should be the main.  I support the Honda page because the vehicle is only known as an Acura in the US and Canada.  Any opposition? --Daniel J. Leivick 05:26, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I support moving this article to Honda Integra and leaving Acura Integra a redirect. --Kuroki Mio 2006 23:28, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Doesen't the Integra Type-R only come in manual? If it does, I think it would be noteworthy enough to put under the Type-R section. Not many newer cars come only in manual. If it does come in automatic, feel free to deleat this :-D 71.98.156.88 23:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's true, they only come in manual, but the GS-R is also manual only, so that doesn't make the Type R special. Perhaps it should be added to both the GS-R and Type R sections.Gansan 22:56, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type-R Transmission 

message: I owned a '94 LS coupe (5-spd.) for 11 years.  I always liked to brag that its redline was the highest ever for any production vehicle. (I always thought it was 8100 or 8200 RPM, but Wikipedia says 8400.)  Can someone confirm this?  And if so, provide a reference to it, because I think it's a pretty darn important distinction for a car to have.  
I have the owner's manual right here, but it doesn't say.  I seem to remember the highest-ever-RPM touting in Acura's TV and/or print ads for the Integra back when it came out.  Perhaps this only applied to the GS-R?  (I once went 116mph in my LS on a Tennessee highway... not to brag...)  
Thanks, Chris77xyz 04:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highest redline ever in a production vehicle? (3rd gen.) 

message: I know it is a fine line but I believe that the Integra is a coupe body style rather than a hatchback. A hatchback does not have a normal boot and the roof extends most, if not all the way to the rear of the car. The rear of a Honda/Acura Integra is more a normal boot in a 2 door car, making it a coupe.
I think it should be changed in the tables on the right from hatchback to coupe.
Proud 2 be australian 11:40, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coupe not hatchback