Talk:Djedkare Isesi

message: Merge with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ptahhotep since they are the same person? 174.4.163.53 (talk) 07:37, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Djedkare Isesi and Ptahhotep are not the same person: Djedkare was the king, Ptahhotep one of his viziers. Iry-Hor (talk) 11:19, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Ptahhotep? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Djedkare Isesi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160411203357/http://www.ifao.egnet.net/bifao/Bifao085_art_23.pdf to http://www.ifao.egnet.net/bifao/Bifao085_art_23.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: In accordance with WP:ERA I reset the original era setting that was changed by user Iry-Hor for no reason in [] edit which had no edit summary either at the beginning of a long series of other edits to the text. I am therefore reverting the edit that removed my restoration.--Mevagiss (talk) 11:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  It seems you are getting it wrong: the original era setting was BCE (I know I wrote the article!), it was changed by Newzild and I simply changed it back. Note also that my edit has a summary. It seems however that I undid too many edits by error, I only meant to undo those of Newzild, and I still intend to remove them. Indeed, Newzild removed statements which he decided where controversial but are in fact backed by evidence: for exemple "which heralded a new period in the history of the Old Kingdom" but this is in a source, cited in the text, that says his reign "marks the beginning of a new era". Newzild's edits, although well meaning, are in fact destructive, for he did not take the time to actually consider the article content and only chose to modify it here and there, when he felt something was amiss. I hope he will realise that the article has undergone thorough GA and FA reviews where all of these points have been scrutinized. Iry-Hor (talk) 11:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No the original setting was the one first used in the article. This was introduced in the infobox earliest and then in the text subsequently by a range of editors some time before your first edit; when the use of the BC setting is in place. Your edits later on, starting 14th August 2012 are when the article did not use BCE and in fact there was no use of the BCE era style until you replaced all the BC dates with BCE in November 2015. It is quite easy to check the edit history of the article. You should not have changed all the dates in the edit I highlighted above. That is why I reverted your edit today. Some of the edits earlier today are unhelpful but the BC era setting is the valid one in this article. Note that your big improvements to the article should not include taking ownership or making unilateral decisions on control of the article.--Mevagiss (talk) 14:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Fair enough, I did not mean to convey the impression that "I owned" the article, which certainly is not true, I genuinely believed it had been BCE since the beginning but I recognize that my memory failed me on this and it is clear that, indeed, I had switched the era format over the course of editing. Thus, I reverted all dates to BC instead of BCE. Iry-Hor (talk) 14:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The first use of any era notation was here , where BCE was used. In the very next edit, here  this was changed to BC. Soon after, all references to era notation were removed, until here  when era notation was again used, and it was BC. Arguably this was the first substantive edit. BC was then used for several years, right up to at least late 2014 (at which point I stopped checking), and I suspect BC has remained until recently. The upshot of this is, despite the 'first claim' for BCE, this article has used BC for a long time and its use has become established. Accordingly, this should not now be changed. As I write, we have BC, so let's keep it at that, please. 5.81.164.11 (talk) 21:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retain original setting 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Djedkare Isesi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402105848/http://www.gizapyramids.org/pdf_library/baud_famille_2.pdf to http://www.gizapyramids.org/pdf_library/baud_famille_2.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:37, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Djedkare Isesi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402154623/http://www.ifao.egnet.net/bifao/Bifao095_art_03.pdf to http://www.ifao.egnet.net/bifao/Bifao095_art_03.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:48, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Djedkare Isesi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110201085933/http://egyptologie.ff.cuni.cz/pdf/Forgotten%20Pharaohs%2C%20Lost%20Pyramids.pdf to http://egyptologie.ff.cuni.cz/pdf/Forgotten%20Pharaohs%2C%20Lost%20Pyramids.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130407194835/http://egyptologie.ff.cuni.cz/pdf/ABUSIR%20VI.pdf to http://egyptologie.ff.cuni.cz/pdf/ABUSIR%20VI.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:48, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified