lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Moonstone Castle Mystery

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --MER-C 02:27, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: See  for why I believe this material is a copyvio. MER-C 02:29, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:The Moth Diaries

message: Please don't add unsourced and probably plagiarised material about the upcoming film of the book. Fences&Windows 00:52, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: upcoming? It was finished over a year ago and is just out on DVD....  Bustter (talk) 12:02, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Film
Talk:Marale

message: Please note that Marale is in Honduras and not in Mexico.--Frazzone (talk) 11:32, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistake

message: In the course of copy editing, the only Marale, Francisco Morazán, I could find evidence of is in Honduras, not Mexico, as the comment above from August 2009 states - several other Wikipedias have articles about it, and they all refer to Honduras. I've also expanded the article using content from the Spanish Wikipedia article, which is the best developed, with references from that article (but it needs more). I have not included the Spanish infobox now, as I could not identify an appropriate English Wikipedia infobox to substitute for it, but I have this article marked for further expansion and I'll come back to it when I can. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:54, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy edit, September 2010
Talk:The Mound (novella)

message: I see there has already been some discussion on this topic, but:
From the Main Article: "The story is one of only three by Lovecraft where a non-human culture is described in rich details."
The story itself provides evidence that Kn'yan's culture is an ancient precursor to the current race of humans on earth, since it mentions that the Native Indian tribes are descended from a branch of the ancient Kn'yan who came aboveground and established strongholds.
--Almont (talk) 01:55, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-Human?
Talk:2DTV

message: "2DTV was", not "is". There are, alas, no new episodes produced any longer so it should be past tense. -andy 92.229.65.206 (talk) 17:19, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to make some changes. TheRetroGuy (talk) 00:03, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I favour the past tense ...
Talk:Yamhill County Courthouse

message: The infobox refers to a building that no longer exists, which I think is misleading. The current courthouse only dates to the 1960s. So I don't think the historic building template fits. Katr67 22:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Historic building" infobox

message: Hey, I'm thinking this one should also be in the Yamhill County cat as well as the McMinnville one, since it's the courthouse for the whole county. Katr67 02:30, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category
Talk:A6177 road

message: Cleanup Co-ordination	Cleanup Co-ordination
                     	This article has recently been tagged as requiring cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.
The article may have been flagged as needing cleanup because it has been suggested that:
*the article needs formatting, proofreading, or rephrasing in comprehensible English. 
*the article has multiple overlapping problems. 
*the article is very short and might need expanding, removal or merging with a broader article
For a full list of possible problems see Wikipedia:Manual of Style.
You can use this section to discuss possible resolution of the problem and achieve consensus for action. When there is a consensus that the article is cleaned up please remove the cleanup tag from the article
===Discussion===
This template has been in place for nearly 6 years and there have been multiple cleanup edits since then (including removal of the cleanup tag from article space), I have also pruned excess detail and rewritten some sentences. Therefore I have struck through. Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 14:07, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Cleanup Co-Ordination Point 

message: This template has been in place for nearly 6 years and there have been multiple cleanup edits since then (including removal of the cleanup tag from article space), I have also pruned excess detail and rewritten some sentences. Therefore I have struck through. Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 14:07, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:ACEVAL/AIMVAL

message: Cleanup Co-ordination	Cleanup Co-ordination
                     	This article has recently been tagged as requiring cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.
The article may have been flagged as needing cleanup because it has been suggested that:
*the article needs formatting, proofreading, or rephrasing in comprehensible English. 
*the article has multiple overlapping problems. 
*the article is very short and might need expanding, removal or merging with a broader article
For a full list of possible problems see Wikipedia:Manual of Style.
You can use this section to discuss possible resolution of the problem and achieve consensus for action. When there is a consensus that the article is cleaned up please remove the cleanup tag from the article
===Discussion===    	
===Discussion===
There is scant reporting on ACEVAL/AIMVAL so expansion is difficult vis a vis Wiki policy on original research. Making it a stub for now might be a reasonable option HJ 03:08, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Cleanup Co-Ordination Point 

message: |}</div>
There is scant reporting on ACEVAL/AIMVAL so expansion is difficult vis a vis Wiki policy on original research. Making it a stub for now might be a reasonable option HJ 03:08, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:The Music of Chance

message: I added the original research tag - personally, I like the analysis given, but
there are no citations, which points to originality. 90.242.7.48 21:49, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interpretation 

message: This article is poorly written and should not be used by anyone wishing to find information about the book. Several key parts of the book are left out and the interpretation is not backed  up by a source. Cite something somewhere please. I wish there was more to say about the article, but there isn't enough of the article to say anything about.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.196.191.95 (talk) 06:30, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Read the book and re-write or let someone who knows what they are doing write it
Talk:Adelaide of Löwenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg

message: Cleanup Co-ordination	Cleanup Co-ordination
                     	This article has recently been tagged as requiring cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.
The article may have been flagged as needing cleanup because it has been suggested that:
*the article needs formatting, proofreading, or rephrasing in comprehensible English. 
*the article has multiple overlapping problems. 
*the article is very short and might need expanding, removal or merging with a broader article
For a full list of possible problems see Wikipedia:Manual of Style.
You can use this section to discuss possible resolution of the problem and achieve consensus for action. When there is a consensus that the article is cleaned up please remove the cleanup tag from the article
===Discussion===    	
===Discussion===
I created this article but I am not sure what the problem here is. Could you point it out? User:Dimadick
The main thing that stuck me is that it is overlinked with red-links, which is unrecommended per WP:LINK and just looks bad. But, if you intend to create those pages, I guess it is ok. When I saw this page come in I also tagged it with no-context; I was trying to gauge if it was notable, and from the lead could not tell at all. But, I guess I was a little tag-happy there, as this person is of obvious historical significance, so feel free to remove it.  My only other recommendations are to fill out the prose, and add another reference or two if you can. Danski14 05:27, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Cleanup Co-Ordination Point 

message: |}</div>
I created this article but I am not sure what the problem here is. Could you point it out? User:Dimadick
The main thing that stuck me is that it is overlinked with red-links, which is unrecommended per WP:LINK and just looks bad. But, if you intend to create those pages, I guess it is ok. When I saw this page come in I also tagged it with no-context; I was trying to gauge if it was notable, and from the lead could not tell at all. But, I guess I was a little tag-happy there, as this person is of obvious historical significance, so feel free to remove it.  My only other recommendations are to fill out the prose, and add another reference or two if you can. Danski14 05:27, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Ike! Greenman

message: Who foundout that Minilla was on Greenman?67.175.138.202 03:53, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, do you have a picture?67.175.138.202 20:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

text: @I have the complete series on DVD: Why? (I ask purely out of curiosity.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.139.81.0 (talk) 19:13, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Minilla

message: Who found out about King Kong guest starring in Ike! Greenman and which episode was he in?67.175.138.202 03:44, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: King Kong

message: Hey, I once found on this article that Kamacuras was on here and it was removed later. Was it vandalism?67.175.138.202 21:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kamacuras

message: I'm not sure oif we had all the monsters in the other monster list. Who ever knows all the other please post on there.Kongsaurus12 01:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Monsters List

message: What are some of the same monsters in Greenman that appeared in Godman?67.175.138.202 21:00, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Same Monsters from Godman

message: The Flasher aliens are on another show called Totsugeki Hyuman.They're the same ones in here, because they look like flies.See Japan Hero page of Hyuman. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.175.138.202 (talk) 02:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Flasher

message: Hey, User:Giantdevilfish can you link Some Greenman videos on YouTube. There's the opening and a clip in japanese writing.67.175.138.202 22:04, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Links
Talk:William Peel (Royal Navy officer)

message: Looking among hte sons of Sir Robert, this would have to be the guy in command of HMS America during its reconnaissance visit to the Pacific Northwest in 1845.  See the quoted passage at Talk:HMS America (1810) chronicling his visit to Victoria et al; not sure what would be relevant to the article but maybe one of you WPBio folks might care to indulge and glean what's relevant to Wikicontent.Skookum1 (talk) 17:03, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: In crew of the [[HMS America (1810)|HMS ''America'']], 1845?
Talk:The Mystery of the Brass Bound Trunk

message: I found this article in a list of articles without citations. As one in a series of children's books, there's not much online about this other than online retailers and fan blogs. Taibhseoir (talk) 16:16, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Talk:The National Gain

message: The article states that the author was Finnish. Finland was part of Sweden from 12th century to 1809. The author died in 1803. He was also a priest which is relevant information for this period (social status, education).
Swedish nationality, being a sensitive subject to many Finnish people, could be an issue so I would therefore suggest changing the beginning of the first sentence from:
The National Gain (Swedish title: Den nationnale winsten) is the main work of the Finnish scientist, philosopher and politician Anders Chydenius, published in 1765.
to:
The National Gain (Swedish title: Den nationnale winsten) is the main work of the priest, scientist, philosopher and politician Anders Chydenius from Ostrobothnia (historical province) , published in 1765.
or (if disregarding possible issues) to:
The National Gain (Swedish title: Den nationnale winsten) is the main work of the Swedish priest, scientist, philosopher and politician Anders Chydenius from Ostrobothnia (historical province) , published in 1765.
or to:
The National Gain (Swedish title: Den nationnale winsten) is the main work of the Swedish priest, scientist, philosopher and politician Anders Chydenius, published in 1765.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.226.222.194 (talk) 10:57, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Talk:The New Negro

message: The quote attributed to Eric Walrond seems to be inaccurate. The quote does not appear in the work cited (the short story collection Tropic Death); instead, it seems to have come from this reference work: https://www.google.com/books/edition/Encyclopedia_of_the_Harlem_Renaissance/0L0ULjto_OEC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=walrond+%22contemporary+black+leaders+inadequate+or+ineffective%22&pg=PT1824&printsec=frontcover
Furthermore, the reference work seems to be paraphrasing an article Walrond wrote in 1923, which is two or three years before the publication of The New Negro, suggesting that his comments are much more general than are relevant to this article (despite the article title including the phrase "the new negro" in it). Ryanweb (talk) 13:03, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misattributed quote.
Talk:The New World Order (Robertson book)

message: When the only substantial content of the article is a description of a single critical review making an accusation of anti-Semitism, isn't this a textbook case of WP:UNDUE? (And the Pat Robertson article itself has a section about the book with the same problem.) Ken Arromdee (talk) 22:13, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue weight?
Talk:The Night of the Triffids

message: What prompted him to write the book ? Was it his idea ? Or did someone approach him ? Who arranged things with the copyright owners (estate of John Wyndham) ? -- Beardo (talk) 13:29, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background
Talk:The Notebooks of Lazarus Long

message: RAH was not a notable mathematician and not, as far as I am aware, even as proficient as a good BSc or MSc in that field. Which is all fine... except he just keeps on harping on this point. What was his damage? Did he have a chip on his shoulder, or, conversely, did he just about manage to solve a first-order ODE and somehow believed this modest prowess elevated him above his fellow man? It all feels icky and crackpotty. 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:956C:1C35:22BF:46F1 (talk) 09:12, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone who cannot cope with mathematics is not fully human.
Talk:The Ode Less Travelled

message: This is a reminiscent of a book cover praise text more than an encyclopedia article. No references whatsoever, and yet we have claims such as "Fry -- displays a depth and breadth of knowledge in poetry that is surprising in someone who does not publish his own poetry nor pursue the teaching of literature full-time", and, "the same [no energy, no drive] cannot be said of Fry's own writing which is instructive, humorous and occasionally provocative", and, "terms which he introduces clearly and logically" etc. Are these taken from a real, respectable review of the book? If so, where are the references? 74.56.220.239 (talk) 23:44, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality
Talk:The Old Patagonian Express

message: I think if a travel book gets into an encyclopedia, this is a fair challenge. Did the travel book inspire people to travel where its author did? Inspire them to write still more travel books, on the author's subject or any other? I bet this is measurable. One could (although perhaps not easily) count the number of books whose authors cite this book. 
The Old Patagonian Express sure inspired me to travel in Latin America. Still does. It's dated: nobody cares about Central America now, unless you generously imagine China cares about a ditch in Nicaragua. And it's incomplete, though that is perfectly understandable: a diversion into Brazil, say via Bolivia to Corumbá, would only have lengthened the mission without changing the ending, plus the mission itself benefited from the coherence of all-Spanish-all-the-time. Brazilian trains are an incoherent story all their own. Theroux was wise to skip it. But his book made me wonder all the more about it. Jahutter (talk) 14:18, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significance
Talk:The One Hundredth Thing About Caroline

message: I've boldly redirected all three of these novels to the author page per: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The One Hundredth Thing About Caroline. I'm certain each of these pages could be recreated, so long as reliable secondary sources be applied. BusterD (talk) 14:34, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  As a result of a deletion discussion
Talk:The Onion Field

message: :example of what not to do when stopping and approaching a vehicle.
What did they do that they shouldn’t have? The article references this, so it should be at least mentioned if not described. —98.203.9.162 (talk) 03:44, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What was their mistake? 

message: I worked at a Correctional facility that housed Greg. Greg Powell aka "Onion" worked in the library. We never talked at any length but he was fairly mild-mannered and not a man you would suspect of the notoriety which Powell received. While Powell was not friendly or outgoing by any stretch, he was supportive of other inmates doing legal research in the Law Library. One thing that surprised me while working there was that, for the most part, inmates convicted of murder were most like the average man on the street. In most cases, they were just regular guys who had had a single incident of rage for which they would pay with the rest of their lives. The truly dangerous guys were the ones who had a history of armed robbery. These guys were thugs who got off on the terror and mayhem they had caused.
The other group of inmates that were surprising were so-called psycho-killers. While they did work hard to intimidate staff, once it was established that they were not effective with certain people, they were meek as lambs; certainly not lambs you'd ever want to turn your back on but certainly not the terrors you would expect. There were times when their powers of observation and insight into your personality were truly uncanny. But when that ability was acknowledged and ignored, again, those guys were not the intimidators you would expect. It was, however, easy to see how these individuals in circumstances where guys like this could easily terrorize already scared victims. What I took from this was that dealing with such people in the flattest possible affect would be the most effective way to deal with them.
The most unsettling thing that I ran into during my employment was that people I would later learn were child molesters were the most charming people you could meet. It was easy to see how they gained the trust of children and parents. The best advice I can offer to parents who are trying to decide between healthy caution and outright paranoia is a book by Gavin DeBecker titled "Protecting the Gift."  It shows parents how to follow-up on their instincts and spot "red flags" when their intuition is taking a nap. The book also teaches practical skills to give your child to keep them safer.
Si TankaSitanka (talk) 03:58, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I worked at a correctional facility that housed Greg.
Talk:The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God

message: As I recall, Kant is criticizing attempts to prove the existence of God through Anselm's work and not Christian theology (as Anselm's work is not Christian doctrine). Would it be acceptable to remove the critical of Christianity tag?64.228.75.250 01:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it's gone.  --67.189.44.169 (talk) 18:59, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove tag 

message: There is a closing quote but no opening quote for Manfred Kuehn.  Does someone know where the quote starts?  --67.189.44.169 (talk) 18:59, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where does the quote start? 

message: To place this work of Kant in the category "books of religion" is actually inexact, because it is a philosophical work rather than a religious one. The work has the intention to analyze the idea of God from the rationalism rather than from religion. There is a big difference in both positions. Religion accept the idea of God from what it calls revelation, then, the role of the faithful is believe in it without further questions. In stead, philosophy does not take revelation as a valid evidence, but goes through the help of rationis and logoi. Therefore, it is an erratic classification to say that The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God is a "Book on Religion.
--Albeiror24 - English - Español - Italiano 01:13, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion?
Talk:The Orange Book

message: As a consensus has been reached that the article Orange Book liberalism be merged with this article I would request an admin to kindly complete this merge so as to delist the article from the merge list. Thanks and regards Wikishagnik (talk) 15:53, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Please note that in most cases, a user doesn't have to be an admin to carry out a merge—in fact, I'm not. See Wikipedia:Merging and Help:Merging for more information, and WikiProject Merge if you'd like to help with the rather considerable merge backlog. --BDD (talk) 22:54, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge completion request

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved per discussion.   —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 15:58, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The Orange Book: Reclaiming Liberalism →  – Per WP:SUBTITLE. 207.161.86.162 (talk) 00:40, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:56, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 November 2021 

message: It provides exactly zero information with respect to the ideological underpinnings or policy positions of so-called “Orange Book Liberals.” I literally have to go find the book to have any sense at all of what’s in it. 141.156.196.94 (talk) 05:42, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The ideology section of this page is essentially unusable 

message: We'd need a citation (not least as it's perfectly possible that the title was simply a coincidence to begin with - one must be careful not to jump to conclusions), but is the title a deliberate echo of Lloyd George's Orange Book of the late 1920s, "We Can Conquer Unemployment"? There was also a Green Book on agriculture (natch), a Yellow Book on Industry, one on Coal etc etc.Paulturtle (talk) 17:02, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lloyd George's Orange Book