lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cauliflower

message: Hello all! My colleague and I would like to expand upon some parts of this article in order to improve its comprehensiveness for public consumption. Here are our plans for each section:
:Cause:
:: expand on cause with more pathophysiology, describing how a hematoma forms in general
:Prevention:
:: Expand on effectiveness of various prevention methods
:: Find more information about each headgear type
:Treatment:
:: Expand on surgical corrections of cauliflower ear, as article currently leaves much to be desired
:History:
:: Find some more fun facts about famous folks with cauliflower ear or, if possible, some famous folks who had it successfully treated
As892 (talk) 11:47, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  UCF College of Medicine Wiki Medicine Project 

message: In 2016, global production of cauliflowers (combined for production reports with broccoli) was 25.2 million tonnes...
"Tonnes"?  "Tones"?  "Tons"?  In following the link to find out why cauliflower production might be measured in audio units, I find that "tonne" is a somewhat controversial and ambiguous term.  Why not, then, give the production figure in some standard and less controversial unit:  killograms; metric tons; pounds; tons; etc.?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.253 (talk) 18:39, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production 

message: Cauliflower 37.111.134.92 (talk) 07:10, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bio
Talk:Megapode

message: Why is the name of this article Mound-builders? Aren't articles supposed to have singular names? We have dove, tern, owl, and mimid; we don't have doves, terns, owls, or mimids. Unless someone comes up with a good reason why this article should have a plural name I'm going to move it to either Megapode or Mound-builder (bird). Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 22:50, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Megapode is a better term. Partly because some of the birds don't build mounds, but bury their eggs, so the term is misleading. --Michael Johnson 23:27, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Megapode is a much better term. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 06:05, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay. I moved it and fixed all redirects. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 17:29, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name and Proposed Move

message: The Clifford street bush turkey   
By Lillie Alston   
One spring afternoon, me and my family eating dinner, suddenly my dad spotted a bush turkey at our front lawn 
It was making a mound, a mound is also known as a nest. 
                                                                                                           
It was getting bigger by the moment it was 1.5 meters high, the mound was made out of mulch from trees. did you know that, a male bush turkey makes a nest, once it is big enough it will wait for a female bush turkey to come along and lay its eggs in the males mound. there is up to 16 to 24 eggs in a nest. if 7 female bush turkeys put all there eggs together there is 50 to 70 eggs .
it is safe to feed a bush turkey food scrapes the safest ones are carrot punkin potatos and punkin seeds the bush turkey feeds on small bugs and insects \
for more information about me and bush turkeys go to [http://www.bushturkeywondercom.org.au  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.105.238.174 (talk) 03:52, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  bush turkey 

message: * (Discuss) – Australian Brush-turkey → ..Pvmoutside (talk) 15:43, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Given the advanced development of the hatchling, how long is incubation for megapodes, compared to other birds?  Andy Dingley (talk) 23:30, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incubation period? 

message: A megapode is referenced in Unseen Academicals.
https://terrypratchett.com/discworld/ho-the-megapode/ Rajanala83 (talk) 13:58, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia - 2023 is Discworld Year of the Querulous Megapode
Talk:Uwe Kils

message: I tried to find good secondary sources for notability, but didn't really find very much to support the rough guidelines in WP:PROF:
::1. The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.
::: A search on Web of Knowledge turned up only 15 publications, so I was wondering if Kils has impacted the field in any other way that isn't reflected in publications.
::2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.
:::The Heinz Meier Leibnitz Prize is a regular award for young scientist, which are pretty common. I don't think it really qualifies as exceptional. 
::3. The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g. a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a Fellow of a major scholarly society for which that is a highly selective honor (e.g. the IEEE).
:::This may be true, but I found no evidence for this. He may have held a Heisenberg Fellowship, but that is a pretty common source of funding for early-stage scientists, rather than a 'prestigious membership'.
::4. The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions.
:::This may be true, but I found no evidence for this.
::5. The person holds or has held a named chair appointment or "Distinguished Professor" appointment at a major institution of higher education and research.
:::This may be true, but I found no evidence for this. The most senior title is found was 'associate professor'.
::6. The person has held a major highest-level elected or appointed academic post at a major academic institution or major academic society.
:::This may be true, but I found no evidence for this.
::7 The person has made substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity.
:::This may be true, but I found no evidence for this.
::8. The person is or has been the head or chief editor of a major well-established academic journal in their subject area.
:::This may be true, but I found no evidence for this.
::9. The person is in a field of literature (e.g writer or poet) or the fine arts (e.g. musician, composer, artist), and meets the standards for notability in that art, such as WP:CREATIVE or WP:MUSIC.
:::Does not apply to marine biology. If he is notable as a photographer, he should be credited as such, rather than as a biologist.
Any clarification of the above points (with sources) would be much appreciated. Thanks! 109a152a8a146 (talk) 21:26, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability?
Talk:Hornbill

message: Does anyone know what species the bird pictured in the taxobox is?jimfbleak 13:24 Apr 8, 2003 (UTC)
Not 100 % sure, but I would guess, that it's a female Northern Ground Hornbill (Bucorvus abyssinicus) - compare http://mail.nfi.org.za/hornbill/abyspic.htm -- Cordyph 13:35 Apr 8, 2003 (UTC)
I took a picture of a Red-billed Hornbill in the Kruger National Park. The cropped version is at :Commons:Image:Red_Hornbill_eating_insect.jpg, if you think it's worth adding. (I think it is, but don't want to replace it: maybe I'm biased). If you want a bit of context (just some out-of-focus grass) put a note on my talk page. --Taejo 16:34, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Set up merge request. Reasons: Article topic is redundant (the only difference is the taxonomic level). Some information from Bucerotiformes is useful. Sibley-Ahlquist's "DNA evidence" is generally considered insufficient for taxonomic decisions nowadays. It gives a reasonable estimate of relatinships, but is entirely misleading when it comes to elevationg families to the order level. Besides, whether it is correctly referred to as "evidence" (as opposed to "data") is arguable; the raw data is evidence, but the conclusions are inference. NB: It is generally good to avoid imprecise statements like "DNA evidence" (meaning that it is to be preferred to cite sources and define what exactly was analyzed and how). The difference between what is researched in a DNA-DNA hybridization analysis (a fairly crude measure of overall genomical similarity, which is why Accipitridae cannot be tackled thus) and a mtDNA sequence analysis (an estimate of maternal ancestry, which is why the Anas ducks can hardly be analyzed thus) is as large as between either and a morphological analysis. DNA-DNA hybridization is very much a thing of the past; hardly any serious scientist does it anymore today. Dysmorodrepanis 15:37, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Support Sabine's Sunbird  talk 19:32, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge [[Bucerotiformes]] here?

message: See section title. They seem to be the same species but I am uneducated in this area, so.. just making sure. Robin Chen 04:05, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: are writhed billed hornbill and writhed hornbill supposed to lead to the same page?

message: I want someone to add Bucerotiformes into the TaxoBoxes of the hornbill species! This is due to DNA evidence.--4444hhhh (talk) 17:44, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  SOS! Bucerotiformes 

message: The Cultural significance section needs work. As it is it is contradictory. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 13:12, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like someone was using the article space as a talk page. Fixed. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 21:37, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural significance
Talk:Marcel Mule

message: Heitor Villa-Lobos's "Fantasia" should be mentioned as a work composed for Mule.  Badagnani 20:03, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Villa-Lobos "Fantasia" 

message: of 'Mule', please. 14.201.107.182 (talk) 22:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation...
Talk:Ally

message: TUF-KAT made this a redirect to Ally McBeal earlier, but the two incoming links were for "alliance" and the French town/village. Hence the disambiguation stuff. --rbrwr
217.157.142.123: When you remove something, please leave a note as to why you are removing it. Ally is a valid television series. Thanks. Lazyd0g 10:49, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Juilliard School

message: Does anyone have a good source for the size of this school's endowment? If so, could you put it in the info box at the top of the article? Please and thank you. Drabconcert (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 14:08, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Endowment
Talk:Constrictor knot

message: this page was merged from Miller's knot and constrictor knot--LadyofHats 00:14, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Miller's knot confusion

message: I removed the following text from the article as I was not exactly sure how it should be interpreted.  It was added by 216.194.229.6.  
::The most robust form is #1253, which begins with an Overhand hitch oriented like the Clove hitch (sometimes a mistaken illustration for this).
Though similar in structure, I'm not sure whether #1253 qualifies as a variation of the Constrictor..  I may be mistaken, but since it is based on the "overhand hitch" it can only be tied with access to an end of the line unlike the other members of the constrictor family... --Dfred 21:45, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: #1253 considered Constrictor variation?

message: I understand that many of the references in the History section of this article were apparently discussed in an issue of Knotting Matters (the IGKT's official publication) under the title "Letter from Lester".  The author was apparently Lester Copestake.  If anyone has access to this periodical, please flesh out the comment about "research suggests" to give proper credit for collecting many of the references later discussed.  --Dfred (talk) 17:43, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To follow-up on my old query; I was wrong on practically all the details about this this work!  The proper title is actually "A Letter to Lester" (emphasis mine).  It is a collection of (mostly) correspondence written by Pieter van de Griend, co-editor and author of History and Science of Knots.  It was privately published in 1992,  -- not published in Knotting Matters.  It provides significant additional context for the History section.  I will be working to integrate some additional information from this source soon...  --Dfred (talk) 18:32, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Letter 
from
 to Lester"? 

message: While I understand that Wikipedia is designed to simply be a reference about things, I think that based on the nature of the knots and the WikiProject the only way to fully explain a knot is to explain how to tie it.  As for the subject of Tone, I think that simply stating how the knot is constructed would lead to more confusion about the knot than it would answer any questions. However, I do agree that by the letter of the law it is technically wrong, I feel that the removal of the instructional part would detract too greatly from the article to be justified.  ThePhigment (talk) 18:04, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tying, Instructions and Tone

message: I noticed, that the Boa knot is just another name for the Constrictor knot.
I did the two knots and they are the same!
What do you think? Der Barbar (talk) 16:27, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boa knot is just another name for the Constrictor knot
Talk:August 1

message: Most of the people listed here as having died on August 1st actually seem to have died on June 28th according to their articles.
James Madison
Warren G. Harding
Paul von Hindenburg
Joris Ivens
Mikhail Tal
Abraham Ortelius
Angela 21:51, 19 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and Charles V was elected Holy Roman Emperor on June 28 (Not August 1), 1519. This whole page probably needs review and verification. Wait, yes this page definetly needs review and verification.
StanZegel 04:09, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication of June 28 events 

message: On 12 Aug we note "1834 - Slavery is abolished in the British Empire" but on 28 August we note "1833 - Slavery abolished in the British colonies". My understanding was that slavery was abolished throughout the Empire in 1833, I think some colonies (possibly Canada) abolished earlier but this wouldn't have been every colony in the Empire. Does anyone have more concrete? AllanHainey 10:52, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: duplication of Aug 23

message: For some reason, the list of births from August 12th appeared here above the August 1 births. I've removed them. 193.113.57.161 07:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  August 12th? 

message: Does anyone else think this article is up to GA status?--Bigpoliticsfan (talk) 00:35, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking for someone to nominate this article for GA status 

message: The link for Frank Herberts Dune novel points to wrong entry (Desert dune instead of novel). Correct link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dune_(novel) BFjeldso (talk) 04:23, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , thanks.  –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 04:50, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 August 2019 

message: 1st August - National Girlfriend Day 89.197.190.29 (talk) 08:55, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Melmann 13:29, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 August 2019 

message: According to the link, PJ Eymard died in 1868:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Julian_Eymard
--JFCochin (talk) 21:59, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Julian Eymard (1869)
Talk:René Descartes

message: Is the correct spelling of the surname "Descartes" (one word), "Des Cartes" (two words), or "Des-Cartes" (hyphenated)?  The printed works appear to give both the one word or hyphenated versions.  That he dropped the tussenvoegsel for the Latin version of his name might suggest two word usage.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.168.242.44 (talk) 05:59, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surname Spelling 

message: His remains are not in the Abbey of Saint-Germain-des-Prés. Even though his name is engraved on the floor, there is no tomb, and if you ask the church keepers, they will tell you the engravings are symbolic and that there are no more bones there. The skull is in the Musee de l'Homme but it is not in display, the real skull is in the research floor. 2A02:1811:C0E:9C00:C1A5:C871:B9D7:3E97 (talk) 01:56, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remains 

message: René DesCartes signed himself "Renatus DesCartes", as what was his preferred name (at the time). 97.113.11.42 (talk) 02:22, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  René DesCartes signed himself "Renatus DesCartes", as what was his preferred name (at the time).
Talk:Middle English

message: I tweaked... The basic Old English Latin alphabet consisted of 24 letters: 20 standard letters plus four additional letters: ash ⟨æ⟩, eth ⟨ð⟩, thorn ⟨þ⟩ and wynn ⟨ƿ⟩. There was not yet a distinct j, v or w, and Old English scribes did not generally use k, q or z. 2603:3020:BE7:A000:5490:8C43:B4E5:7CA7 (talk) 15:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you count the dotted-y (Ẏẏ) of the Old English rune poem (in , etc.)? – •Raven  .talk 06:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Old English Latin alphabet consisted of 24 letters: 20 standard letters + 4 additional letters
Wikipedia talk:Library of Congress Country Studies

message: Has there been any serious considerations of using the Library of Congress Country Studies as a source for Wikipedia? There is a statement on the web page which seems to resolve the copyright issue:
:"Information contained in the Country Studies On-Line is not copyrighted and thus is available for free and unrestricted use by researchers. As a courtesy, however, appropriate credit should be given to the series."
There ought however to be some form of guidelines for using it as a source. The scope and breadth of the studies that I'm familiar with is impressive but I'm not sure that just dumping them on Wikipedia would be a good idea, though this could rather be something for Sourceberg. The number of countries are roughly 100 at present and the "most important" are often missing from the list, but they ones availiable provides a very thorough source and much more so than the entries of the (CIA) World Fact Book. -- Mic 05:26 Apr 9, 2003 (UTC)
I've just used these studies once to date on Constitution of Pakistan, and I think that it is a very useful, as it is not copyright, I see no reason not to quote it liberally and just put a link at the bottom of the page. I have only used one particular part of one particular essay and modified it and wikified it a bit to use it in an article. That is what we do here, no? Alex756 04:02, 26 Aug 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Fred

message: m (non notable. not even PureBasic cites him.)
The above is from the one who removed Fred from the list of Freds. YOU CAN'T READ, CAN YOU? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.166.203.165 (talk • contribs) 20:24, 2 February 2006
:I can read just as much as anyone can edit that article. Luckly, someone mentioned today how notable Mr. Fred PureBasic is. --Abu Badali 20:34, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability of Mr Laboureur

message: There is a guy on YouTube who calls himself Fred. He pretends to be an 8-year-old boy with a wierd, high-pitched, voice. He talks very fast. He is very watched and is arguably one of the most popular users on YouTube.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bubble90210 (talk • contribs) 04:23, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube Fred 

message: Here on this dab page, it says that the two footballers have the apelido "Fred".  But in this case(and as in most) the name Fred is short for a first name such as Frederick. Apelido means surname, which is normally the last name, or name of the family. The word apelido should be changed to nickname.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.215.128.112 (talk) 18:59, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: While normally this is true, I think in this case apelido means the "soccer stage name" (which the Brazilians take quite seriously -Socrates, Pelé, Garrincha, Zico, Eder, etc.) and "nickname" really doesn't cover it. Or maybe English doesn't have an adequate term.. MURGH disc. 23:17, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, in spoken Brazilian Portuguese, apelido never means surname. This applies to spanish, and it sometimes it may apply to formal language. But most people in Brasil understands apelido as nickname.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.86.0.223 (talk) 14:41, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The two Brazilians

message: The redirect FR3D has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Skarmory (talk • contribs) 18:06, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:FR3D]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Analytical Society

message: Leibnizian calculus ... was being used very constructively, for instance in devising and expressing Robert Maxwell's equations.
What are Robert Maxwell's equations? The link seems to make little sense. Should it be Maxwell's equations?
Sebastjan
:On the other hand, it says "by 1830", which would be about a year before James Clark Maxwell was born. But even worse, it's almost a decade before Robert Maxwell was born. Perhaps a different Robert Maxwell? -- John Owens 09:45 Apr 9, 2003 (UTC)
:: I meant James Clerk - his work was a particularly significant example of work and progress made using Leibnizian calculus. Arno 07:50 Apr 10, 2003 (UTC)
There is absolutely no proof that Robert Woodhouse had anything to do with the Analytical Society.
Most evidence suggests that Charles Babbage and Edward Bromhead were the founders of the Analytical Society.
James Clerk Maxwells famous equations actually were so difficult to understand (poorly written rather than complicated) that others translated them into the form we recognise them today.  Hence they are his equations in name only.Tdunster (talk) 15:01, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Reference to J.C. Maxwell has been removed as irrelevant. Woodhouse has been kept since his aim was in line with the Analytical Society.Rgdboer (talk) 23:22, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Maxwell

message: I have removed a proposed deletion tag that was added by  with the explanation "Biased, needs complete re-write with sources". I don't think the article is so biased that deletion is justified, although I agree it would be improved by additional sources. Gandalf61 (talk) 11:33, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed prod