lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tapihritsa

message: I am pleased this article was not deleted as a Wikikin had opined it should on my discussion page.
B9 hummingbird hovering (talk • contribs) 15:19, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion 

message: Non-notable people don't get their works translated into English by two different translation teams, now do they? Skyerise (talk) 13:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed notability template
Talk:Syrian diaspora

message: The article needs to be updated. After the war lots of Syrians immigrated to other countries.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.191.221.74 (talk) 08:04, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Cape hare

message: What are the sources for Special:Diff/507419611? I ask because I created :ro:Lepus capensis on Romanian Wikipedia and I want to expand the article with data from here, but in this article there are no sources. --NGC 54 (talk | contribs) 19:10, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't know anything about this, as I did not write that sentence, nor do I speak French. Drakenwolf (talk) 09:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: The species name brown hare redirects here, yet there seems to be no mention of this in the article. Is brown hare an alternative name for this species? 
AustinRedd007 (talk) 17:21, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I had to dig back in the history. The name was removed as "belonging to the European hare", but common names can belong to multiple species, so I restored it. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:31, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Names
Talk:Biodiversity of Ghana

message: Moved page to insert missing space in Faunaof Ghana but I now see that several similar pages are named Wildlife of Xxxxx instead. Maybe this page should be moved again for consistency? Any comments? Romney yw (talk) 23:48, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: Should this article be renamed to List of fauna of Ghana?  RJFJR (talk) 04:19, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Further rename?

message: I don't actually know how to change the page name, else I would do it. Right now it says "Fauna of Ghana" but is about 50/50 flora and fauna. I think most properly it would be "Biota of Ghana" or at a stretch use "Flora and Fauna of Ghana" or "Wildlife of Ghana."68.167.26.113 (talk) 12:37, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Wildlife of Ghana or Biodiversity of Ghana would be a reasonable option. Since no one seems to have given an opinion in the last 6 years I will make the move as uncontroversial. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 13:45, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name
Talk:The Forum on Peachtree Parkway

message: I suggest we not merge this article into any other articles.  I think it should be expanded to include shops that are located there and other relevant information on the current status of the location.  The question will arise, however, as to how we can site sources for the stores located at the forum.
FYI if anyone wants to work on this one: they do have a website, http://www.theforumonpeachtree.com/ , which should work for citing which shops are in the mall.  It might also be worth looking for articles that discuss its castle-like architecture, which is unusual for a strip mall. 167.181.12.18 (talk) 17:46, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Robert Fyfe

message: Discogs and imdb say Born 19 June 1925 in Alloa, Scotland, UK. 2001:56A:FA85:3800:C6B:6C38:9603:2EA6 (talk) 21:40, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date

message: A Times obituary is available
:
(It confirms he was born on September 25, 1930 in Kirkcaldy, Fife). --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:20, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Times obituary
Talk:Sam Hamad

message: This piece of garbage was fired for illegal ethics. His smile is phony. I met him and he's the lowest form of scum. The kind of monster who would be killing his own citizens back in Syria. At least we helped take one sicko off their hands. Now to throw him in prison where he so rightfully belongs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.230.143.70 (talk) 03:16, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  He was fired for corruption
Talk:Let Us Now Praise Famous Men

message: I'm adding the refimprove template, because the article has only one citation. Katiedert (talk) 20:39, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refimprove template 

message: There is some vocal setting of Ecclesiasticus 44 1-15, to which cross-reference ought to be made in an article with this Subject.
It is identified, probably, in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Finzi;
and http://www.geraldfinzi.com/works_uk.php refers. 
I've not found Finzi's words on the Web in writing; but they can be heard at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CznY76R_bJ4.
Words set by Vaughan Williams too : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5elfdz1aBxk, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAP4M1VdNLM.
94.30.84.71 (talk) 18:03, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That's all well and good, but it has little or nothing to do with this book.  Remember, Wikipedia articles are about specific subjects, not phrases. 75.36.150.121 (talk) 07:17, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  There should certainly be a reference, in the article, to the setting by Ralph Vaughan Williams; there are several versions on YouTube. That setting is extremely well known in the UK, whereas the book is scarcely heard of. There should also be a disambiguation page, so that those searching for the music do not get led astray to an article about an obscure book. 94.30.84.71 (talk) 10:09, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vocal Setting 

message: In its current state, the article is both imbalanced--it has basically no criticism of the book, though there has been scholarly criticism of LUNPFM--as well as almost completely unreferenced. That needs to change, or it needs to be stubbed until that IS changed. LHM 22:29, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs to be properly referenced or stubbed. 

message: Bam!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.52.207.149 (talk) 18:19, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link to the edu-site removed! 

message: "Although the book is presented as documentary and "true", the pictures were actually somewhat posed, for technical and aesthetic reasons, leading to current controversy over the truth of historical records.[4] This was not uncommon in photography of this time period."
--> This is perhaps better left to articles which discuss documentary photography and the documentary style directly, as this is a concern shared by all such works, from the advent of photography to the present day. It is, after all, impossible, to ignore the camera's gaze. That is to say, we all react and pose in one form or another when confronted as the subject of such an image, and there are few series which have gone so far as to feature an artist completely hidden from view.TerryToogood (talk) 04:06, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documentary Criticism
Talk:Wildlife of Liberia

message: I've never figured out what species it is, but the pepperbird has long been a national symbol.  See  for some sample items, including  and .  Nyttend (talk) 03:02, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi , According to here, it is the Common bulbul. JennyOz (talk) 12:04, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, thank you; since you got that for me, I was able to find a reliable source linking the pepperbird with this bulbul.  Pycnonotus barbatus, the common bulbul, is the pepperbird.Travel sketches from Liberia : Johann Büttikofer's 19th century rainforest explorations in West Africa.  Henk Dop and Phillip T. Robinson, eds.  Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2013, 80.  But where can I find a reliable source saying that this is the country's national bird?  All I'm seeing are websites put up by no-name people.  Note left at WP:RDH.  Nyttend (talk) 23:01, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There are some bulbul stamps on here including a 2018 miniature sheet naming the Garden Bulbul as "The National Bird of Liberia". I'd assume they were issued by their official PO. I can't find any mention on their govt sites of their national symbols nor for their PO, so still no RS. JennyOz (talk) 01:17, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pepperbird
Template talk:Syrian diaspora

message: I know that there is a significant number of Syrians living in Lebanon, most of these people moved there to find jobs, also during the Syrian presence some soldiers who were stationed in Lebanon and had to stay there for long periods of time basically had their families move with them. Another thing, the link Israel in the template brings up the article Syrian Jews. While some of them indeed emigrated to Israel, I think most Jews in Syria went to North America. I assume the link there is just temporary. Asabbagh 10:38, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought about Lebanon for a while but hesitated on including it, mainly because Lebanese and Syrians are of a very close ethnolinguistical family and there have been through history many immigrations and emigrations between the two countries, which creates confusion. So, as you might have noticed in the diaspora article, I said that the group did not include people living in the area historically known as Greater Syria. I don't really know, should we include it? As for Israel, well, I think it's OK to keep the current article because it is likely that a new article on Syrian Israelis will not contain any more information than the Syrian Jews article. Any thoughts? —Anas talk? 11:27, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions
Talk:Branch collar

message: Article needs public domain drawing or permission to use Shigo's.  
Article needs photo.  
We arborists need to add articles defining and describing our activities and terminologies.
--pechaney 15:48, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Parade (Bottom)

message: Some weeks ago, when I wrote the credits section of this article, I chose the names actually given in the credits at the end of Parade from the 2004 region 2+4 BBC DVD of Bottom. Here, the part played by Brian Croucher is given as "Ted Nugent". Harry the Bastard was a name used as part of a gag, as the character even went on to say his name is Ted. Davidwil 15:59, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Credits
Talk:Bubanza

message: its pathetic!!!! How can wikipedia be taken as a useful resource if this is what you get??  ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦  "Expecting you" Contribs 16:00, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Christchurch Girls' High School

message: Better than some NZ schools, but wiki needs more topics. What is notable about this school. Long history - any alunmi refs Victuallers 16:04, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess
Talk:Herz und Mund und Tat und Leben, BWV 147

message: List of Bach cantatas by liturgical function says that this cantata with the same name (BWV 147a) was writtein for "Advent IV" on 20 December 1716 and is now "lost" and that the work as its known now was written 2 July 1723 and "adapted from BWV 147a".  Anyone know more of the story here?  I only know what I read in the other article.  DavidRF (talk) 04:24, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  BWV 147a 

message: At present the article covers two different works. I don't think they can be handled in one infobox without confusing the reader. The better solution could be to write two articles. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:42, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: BWV 147a --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:57, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two works 

message: In the "History and words" section it starts by saying Bach composed it in Leipzig. In the lead, it says he wrote its predecessor back in the day, when he was still doing his Weimar Thang. I do see how both are encompassed in the article ... it's just the specific word "composed" that I'm finding a bit awkward. Is some sort of rephrase possible, please? And yes, I do know that if I were a proper editor and a decent intellectual I would suggest some alternatives ... but hey. FML. Help! 82.34.71.202 (talk) 22:04, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: "Composed" literally means "put together", I think it's the right term for a creation that partly uses older material, no? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the reply Gerda. I feel a bit "yeah but no but" ... I do understand what "composed" means literally, but in this context I find it a little awkward. Talking about musical composition in an unexceptional way I find "composed" pretty much synonymous with "written", and we've already said when it was written, and then we seem to say it was written again in 1723, and to me that reads in a slightly contradictory manner.  The lead gets it right - it was written, then expanded. Can we not try for something similar in the first body paragraph? Tell you what, if/when time permits I could have a bash at it ... but please don't hold your breath! Thanks 82.34.71.202 (talk) 22:22, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Composed?
Talk:Gastins

message: Wondering if someone can add a redirect to this article from Gastinois, the demonym for Gastins? I was going to add the demonym to the article infobox, but cannot find an online source to verify it. Prime Lemur (talk) 20:24, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add a redirect for this article
Talk:Whaddon Road

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was Support for move back to Whaddon Road as the common name.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:00, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Oppose the move back to Whaddon Road: First of all - I didn't realise there was a "requested moves" thing as there isn't one on any other wiki, so sorry about that. Right, my reasons for opposing the move back. First, Whaddon Road is the common name for the ground, not it's actually not official. The official name was the Victory Sports Ground, from 1945 to a few days ago. Because of the new sponsor, the stadium has been officially renamed the Abbey Business Stadium, there is a link to the news on the official website. Whaddon Road like I said is the name we all use and how people recognise whose stadium it is, but it's not the official name. Officially official (gosh, I'm hating that word now...!). A redirect from Whaddon Road to Abbey Business Stadium will be fine, as nothing else is likely to be named Whaddon Road any time soon (if ever). Dave (talk) 01:12, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: *Comment: I know common names are used but even the Cheltenham website is now reporting on games at the ABS, not Whaddon Road. If there's a redirect from Whaddon Road, the top of the page of this article says that the ground is more commonly known as Whaddon Road, so surely there's no problem. Dave (talk) 11:14, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: *The club are obviously going to refer to it by the sponsored name because the sponsors tell them to, so I'm not sure we can read anything into that.  The local paper, however, refer to it as Whaddon Road..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: *I could argue that that is only the local name... Dave (talk) 20:48, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

text: *I don't think stadiums will change that much in terms of names. This is the first name change for 65 years. We won't move to a new stadium soon either. Name changes are rare - so there's no problem with keeping it as the ABS. Dave (talk) 20:47, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  There is "no problem" with moving it to the previous title either. I'm still not seeing anything related to an actual naming convention to support the current one. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 07:58, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

text: *Well, it won't change for five years... :) But as for the "ghits" thing, that's understandable as the name change was very recent, so not everyone will be aware of it. Dave (talk) 16:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Sushmit

message: Perhaps it is amazing that the page has lasted so long and that too with some information about a future economist. The present contents do not justify the existence of this page. Comments are invited. --Bhadani (talk) 16:16, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I have redirected the page to Susmita until such time as there are articles created about Indian men with name Susmit (or Sushmit), at which time this can be made into a disambiguation page. By the way, would you happen to know if the translation of "Susmita" provided here is accurate? -- Black Falcon (Talk) 19:17, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I know a little Bengali too - at least I can understand Bengali as the Bengali language like many languages of North India has many words of Sanskrit. I feel that the translation is more or less accurate. --Bhadani (talk) 15:52, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, good. Thanks for responding. Cheers, Black Falcon (Talk) 03:36, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Amazing
Talk:Seikanron

message: I included a bit more historiography. I think the same needs to be done on the Satsuma Rebellion and Saigo page. As of now they all contain orthrodox arguments, stated as facts, and not opinions.
I know little about wiki, however, it'd be great of someone can help clean it up. -RoSeeker 12:00, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "...although revisionist historians argue that Saigo's statement was an attempt to win over the support of Itagaki[2], and that Saigo's condemnation of Meiji's provocation against Korea in 1876 suggests that Saigo had always been to "establish a firm relationship"[3]. In any case..."
I don't know anything about the subject, but I feel that the above segment is subjective and seems to contain personal opinion (whether right or wrong - I make no argument there). The use of the term "revisionist historians" carries a negative connotation that implies that the writer feels that these historians are wrong. Just a thought.
Ormiss --164.10.46.62 (talk) 17:22, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: {POV} and {Original research} are added because there are descriptions such as "While orthodox historians" in no source sentences.--Maa13 (talk) 21:38, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:30, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research

message: I am trying to start a number of article related to the Peoria, IL article. These are Co's which an editor felt were not notable enough to list in artcle because they did not have WP articles. I just don't have enough time to flesh them out and format them at the same time. George 16:29, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That works.  :-)  As a rule, you might want to secure that permission before copy and pasting the text to Wikipedia.  You might also want to examine the site's rules-- they may already allow such use.  Coren 18:29, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It just plain is not copyrighted in the first place, as a production of the US government it is PD. Some contain copyrighted material from other parties, but the text copies does not include any. DGG 10:06, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: However, it is not a good idea to incorporate all the spammy PR type prose they use. Please trim it down. DGG 04:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Susan Collis

message: This page is a valid document of an artist living and working today—Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulpieroni (talk • contribs) 
:For inclusion on Wikipedia, the subject must be notable, which may be established with independent secondary sources. Without that, the article is subject for deletion. Wikipedia is not personal webspace. -Cquan (talk, AMA Desk) 16:30, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The speedy deletion has been declined. Upon further look, the subject is definitely notable, but the article still needs to assert it properly. At the moment it's still written like an advertisement or part of an exhibition brochure. I'll leave the article be for maybe a week tops and if there's no improvement, I'll probably start an AfD. -Cquan (talk, AMA Desk) 16:24, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up article
Talk:Crawford International College, Sandton

message: A disappointing page ... more required Victuallers 16:34, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess
Talk:Crawford College, North Coast

message: A disappointing page ... more required Victuallers 16:36, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess
Talk:List of fishes in Kaziranga National Park

message: The source cited is now a deadlink, and the Park's current website does not show any species list. JohnCD (talk) 22:10, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source is dead 
Talk:Khemarak Phoumin

message: ... on the last couple of sections. Paxse (talk) 16:05, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still working... 

message: *http://gateway.nlm.nih.gov/MeetingAbstracts/ma?f=102241353.html
*http://books.google.com/books?id=5_d9sWUZz9MC&pg=PA229&lpg=PA229&dq=Koh+Kong+town&source=bl&ots=lekR5u7jMm&sig=RwrBffsMGaT23bog_XWM02a8crs&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=6&ct=result
*http://www.phnompenhpost.com/index.php/component/option,com_jcs/Itemid,52/crestrictid,7795/task,add/
*http://www.monkeyworld.co.uk/topic.php?TopicID=45&Template=standard
*http://www.civilaviation.gov.kh/index.html
*http://www.flightstats.com/go/Airport/airportDetails.do?airportCode=KKZ
Had to be a lively city... search for November 16, 1999 on   --Riccardo.fabris (talk) 23:59, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for further expansion
Talk:Zipper (data structure)

message: This explanation doesn't seem very clear. It does not even mention that a zipper it a "tree like data structure", as the disambiguation page does.
Somebody who knows more about this stuff than me should try to make this article clearer.
84.137.103.239 16:43, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs better explanations

message: This article is supposed to be about zippers, and not about basic type theory. I removed the long section that said nothing recognizable about zippers. WillOakland (talk) 18:27, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Analogy using sets

message: It seems to me that Henry Lieberman's Marcottage is an anterior expression of the exact same idea wihtout the "mathematical formalism" snobism.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.234.244.169 (talk) 10:02, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Anteriority

message: In the example, a zipper for a list of integers is two lists of integers, but the derivative of a list is something else entirely.
L(A, R) = 1 + A × R
d/dR L(A, R) = A
Perhaps more explanation or a link is appropriate. 75.5.199.65 (talk) 04:22, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  More about "type derivatives"?