Talk:Sweat gland

message: The article should make clear which animals have sweat glands (I believe only mammals, but I'm not completely sure). 92.224.154.4 (talk) 12:24, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed! --beefyt (talk) 18:32, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human-centric 

message: This bot has detected that this page contains an image, :Image:Skin.jpg, in a raster format. A replacement is available as a Scalable vector graphic (SVG) at :File:Skin.svg. If the replacement image is suitable please edit the article to use the vector version. Scalable vector graphics should be used in preference to raster for images that can easily represented in a vector graphic format. If this bot is in error, you may leave a bug report at its talk page Thanks SVnaGBot1 (talk) 15:08, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Image:Skin.jpg]] 

message: Other than in the diagram used, there is nothing about the distribution of sweat produced in the gland to other parts of the body to serve its original function. There should be something about its distribution unless of course, sweat really just stays inside your body... Stevenmitchell (talk) 00:44, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution of Sweat from the Gland 

message: The top of the article claims that only primates have eccrine glands, but further on the article claims that "domestic animals" have eccrine glands on their foot pads. Clearly both cannot be true.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.165.93 (talk) 02:52, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: For later editors, the history of this subject is documented in this source:
* .
There is very likely to be a more recent source, but this may act as a useful adjunct to research. --LT910001 (talk) 23:25, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: in the intro of the article, in the first paragraph after the bullet points defining eccrine and apocrine, 
Domestic animals[which?] have apocrine glands at the base of each hair follicle but eccrine glands only in foot pads and snout. Their apocrine glands, like those in humans, produce an odorless oily milky secretion evolved not to evaporate and cool but rather coat and stick to hair so odor-causing bacteria can grow on it.[12] Eccrine glands on their foot pads, like those on palms and soles of humans, did not evolve to cool either but rather increase friction and enhance grip.
the bolded portion of the text seems to imply that the bacterial growth and resultant odor is the intended effect of apocrine gland secretions. 
the article for apocrine sweat glands does describe the same sweating -->bacteria-->odor process, but in a more passive way, i.e. the bacteria that feed on the sweat are smelly, not like the above bolded text where it seems to imply that the human body uses apocrine sweat glands in order to smell by way of smelly bacteria. 
i know there are arguments for the sexual function of pubic (and armpit hair) trapping odor or pheromones or something.. but are these  "good smells" for sexy time the same as the odors released by the bacteria? ≈Sensorsweep (talk) 18:22, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  apocrine sweat glands + bacteria. 

message: Contrary to popular belief, I've been told by a plastic surgeon that sweat glands in humans do not "open", as in dilate to make the diameter wider, or "close", as in contract making the diameter smaller. I see nothing in the article about whether this is true or not. There are multiple uses of the word "open" in the article, but they seem to mean "communicates with" and not open as in dilating. Example: "Apoeccrine, found in the armpits and perianal region, have ducts opening onto the skin surface." Can someone with a dermatology text book clarify this for me? Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 18:49, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do pores open and close (dilate and contract)? 

message: Which protein is present in the sweat glands 43.227.130.42 (talk) 13:41, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biology