lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Podded engine

message: One of the examples given of airplanes not using podded engines was the DC-10, which does use podded engines.  I replaced it with the F-16 Fighting Falcon, a fighter jet with an embedded engine.
On a related note, do half of the pictures in these boxes not show up for anyone else?--Raguleader 18:11, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples of Non Podded Engines

message: The page said The first successful design to use podded engines was the Boeing 707. I have added the qualification commercial design as at least one military plane, the B-52, preceded the 707 and has podded engines. It would be nice to track down the first use of podded jet engines on any plane. Polpo 16:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Surely the Me-262 counts as having podded engines?  -- RoySmith (talk) 16:42, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the Me-262 would be an excellent example to use, though I'm not sure if it's the FIRST model to use podded engines (I seem to recall some larger WWI biplanes that had the engines in pods between the wings, but I'm unfamiliar with the aircraft of that era).--Raguleader 21:36, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there were any WW-I biplanes with jet engines, podded or not :-) -- RoySmith (talk) 21:59, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: True, but by definition, a prop engine in a pod would be a podded engine.  We'd have to re-word the article so that it's not specifically about jet engines though.--Raguleader 06:00, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose the Ford Trimotor would count as having podded prop engines (at least the outboard two). -- RoySmith (talk) 17:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Blutack (talk) 13:06, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First successful design

message: There are NO sources used in the article whatsoever. This is a violation of the Reliable sources policy, thus the entire article is Original research. No further explanation is needed. - BillCJ (talk) 07:56, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced article

message: The page reads "However, it is now rare to see fuselage-mounted engines behind the wings on public airliners." This is actually untrue. Fuselage-mounted engines are quite common on regional jets from Embrarer and Bombardier.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.92.174.94 (talk) 19:07, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. It is unsourced, so I have removed it. - Ahunt (talk) 20:32, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Fuselage-mounted podded engines
Talk:Veritas Project

message: Who said it was science fiction and why?
------------------------------------------
I'm quite sure somebody is going to nominate this for deletion. Please don't. I have both books and went looking to see if there are any more. Without this page I would have had a hard time finding out they aren't any.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.42.85.82 (talk) 01:42, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pope John Paul II/to do/Archive 1

message: *Change the photo. It's a scandal that every Pope has official portrait on wikipedia, except John Paul II. It shows how biased wikipedia is.
*The article is virtually unreferenced except for the Pope's declining health and final days; although they are not, many sections appear highly unsystematic, perhaps because of their sheer length
*image tags and rationales, only a few fair use ones
*Changes he made at the Vatican and criticisms of him.
*too few inline citations for such an important article.
*the prose isn't exactly brilliant, there are very few paragraphs over 2-3 sentences, much of the article reads like bullet points without the bullets
*the focus on death, too little focus on S. America, etc. These are major changes and will take some time to fix, depending on how busy I am (feel free to help!). Thus, I plan to take this article to peer review after I'm done fixing all the objections and then re-submitting it as a FAC. 
Update: All minor objections (such as fixing confusing uses of John Paul to John Paul II and the "Health" section) have been taken care of. Thanks to everybody for their comments and suggestions. I will be taking a look at the rest of the comments/suggestions over the next few days, and will get to them soon! Thanks! Flcelloguy 02:52, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:New York State Route 25C

message: This is now a touring route once again from Lakeville to New Hype Pk Rd. I have a photo of a new NY 25C shield. I just can't figure how to upload it.Andrew Kirschner (talk) 01:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Technically WP:OI is the valid policy. However, I am kind of curious to how this happened to come back. Mitch32(It is very likely this guy doesn't have a girlfriend.) 03:14, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

text: Also, any chance you could edit the photo to cut out the car from the photo? Might be useful. Mitch32(It is very likely this guy doesn't have a girlfriend.) 10:12, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

text: This really isn't a valid citation. Until the DOT says otherwise, this is merely a contractor error and the route still does not exist. – TMF (talk) 16:34, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure, but it's not as if there haven't been any contractor errors before. Sometime during the mid-1970's there were signs along the Hutchinson River Parkway for the former New York State Route 126 at the Mamaroneck Avenue interchange. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  02:23, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Everything I've read said NY 25C. My friends from NYSDOT also have noted NYSDOT will never use suffixed routes again, so why would it come back as 25C? 525 makes more sense. Also, why only this piece. It's an error and there is no source pointing to its return. Mitch32(Wikipedia's worst Reform Luddite.) 19:24, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Touring shields
Talk:D. A. Clarke

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 06:45, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Dameon Clarke

message: An accurate and properly-sourced year of birth is needed for this person. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 23:41, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accurate year of birth needed
Talk:St. Peter and St. Paul's Church

message: I have amended the list in country sections and began to look at one of the English counties - Kent. I have a ref to a website on Kent churches, and by the time I reached E for Eythorne I had 17 of them! and that is but one of the 40-odd counties in England. I am afraid this will become a large article Peter Shearan 18:29, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lots in England

message: I removed
* Saints Peter and Paul Catholic Cathedral, Indianapolis, Indiana
* Sts. Peter and Paul Church, Naperville in Naperville, Illinois
from the dab, as neither seems to comply with MOS:DABRL requirements to be listed here in a dab page. --doncram (talk) 22:30, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed Indiana and Illinois ones 

message: The article on Weobley mentions this church as The village has early 13th century Church, St Peter and St Paul's Church, Weobley. The Church has a Norman south doorway, a 13th-century chancel and 14th-century tower and a spire that is the second-tallest in the county. However the reference there is to  https://www.visitherefordshirechurches.co.uk/st-peter-st-paul-weobley/ which gives a 404 error, page not found. Andrewa (talk) 15:38, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  St Peter and St Paul's Church, Weobley
Talk:Darzens reaction

message: Error in mechanism
There is an error in the mechanism; the a-chloroacetate is shown to be deprotonated to form a carbene; this is in fact not the case, the author forgot about the second hydrogen on the alpha carbon.  The intermediate should be a carbanion.
128.61.92.32 (talk) 22:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Anglo-Quebecer musicians

message: NOTICE: Please note that this page refers only to Quebecers (that is, those born there or with a strong connection to the province [i.e. raised there]) who speak English as their mother tongue. Please do not add Simple Plan or similar groups to the list, as they are not Anglo-Quebecers but Francophone Quebecers who sing in English, and would be a better fit as part of the List of Quebec musicians (and List of Québécois musicians, as they are native French-Canadians)--Larineso 18:44, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Ratchet effect

message: Would it be appropriate to add an example on the increasing powers granted to security agencies in democracies? The erosion of rights is a double ratchet: powers granted ratchet up within a nation, and the examples of other nations are used to ratchet up the powers granted within nations behind the curve.
Although these powers can and are revoked occaisionally, the same applies to the removal of beaurocracies given in other examples.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.8.170.141 (talk) 04:28, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Would it be appropriate to add an example on the increasing powers granted to security agencies in democracies? 

message: The claim that adipocytes never die is false and has been debunked:
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/8.30/helthrpt/stories/s20847.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/05/health/research/05fat.html?_r=1
As such, in the absence of any citations for this example, I have removed it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dausuul (talk • contribs) 16:31, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Obesity Example 

message: Jevons paradox describes the idea of efficiency in energy leading to increase in the consumption due to a fall in price.  I've never heard of the rachet effect, would it be applicable.  If so, it might be worth adding a few links and maybe a paragraph?     Thekappen (talk) 22:28, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Would Jevon's Paradox be an example? 

message: The use of the term to describe irreversible government expansion by Keith Joseph (Margaret Thatcher's policy adviser) in the 1970s predates the publication of Higgs's Crisis and Leviathan. The term is well known in this connection in the UK, and associated with Thatcherism, though perhaps less so in the US.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.166.43.48 (talk) 17:47, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keith Joseph has priority over Robert Higgs 

message: Citing Thomas Malthus as support for this statement, really?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.229.172.72 (talk) 23:19, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first reference.
Talk:Zeca Baleiro

message: This article was started by User:Crissspy, who is unfortunately now indefinitely blocked. Just about all the basic information is missing for this notable artiste, such as year and date of birth, discography, and the name of the university he went to. Also sources are needed for what's already in the article. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 18:52, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for expansion
Talk:SS Manhattan (1961)

message: Could anyone more experienced try to fix the linking and naming problem with this ship?
There is an SS Manhattan article about an oceanliner, but that does not appear in the "Manhattan disambiguation" page. Does anyone have a better title for this one (because the tanker was also called SS Manhattan)? The German Wikipedia has an excellent article on the tanker which is called "SS Manhattan" there.
:The above was unsigned in August 30, 2006 by User:Escier.  Now that I have posted another Manhattan ship (with a too lengthy lead disambig, we should send all three to a disambig with the tanker being called Manhattan (tanker).  Americasroof 12:41, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: The page uses "was" and like other ship pages (e.g., Navy) generally the date of decommissioning is place.  Saves having to check elsewhere. 143.232.210.38 (talk) 01:55, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Current disposition
Talk:Konstantin Vasilyev

message: Image for link is wrong for Rusalka by Konstantin Vasiliev
Someone has posted a picture of a boat called 'Rusalka', and has somehow knocked the painting off wikimedia. I'm not sure what to do about this, as deleting the image may not be the right thing, although I'm not sure that WM needs an image of a pleasureboat, but it might be used an a 'pleasureboat' article somewhere?
Can someone more experienced do something about this? There are a number of articles, including the one about Konstantin Vasiliev, that now show this boat, not his painting?
Metacosm (talk) 17:17, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Vasilyev's works will not enter the public domain until 2047 and until then they can't be uploaded to Commons. Óðinn ☭☆ talk 01:49, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Volkswagen air-cooled engine

message: Moved from Volkswagen Beetle:
:"==Alternative uses for VW Beetle engines==
:"thumb|VW Beetle engine, front view. With cooling casing and fan removed
::"The air-cooled 4-cylinder horizontally opposed cylinder (a flat four) has been used for many other purposes.
* Certified aircraft engines has been made by Limbach since 1970, and by Sauer since 1987.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SvingenB (talk • contribs) 08:32, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Since almost all of it is unsourced I wouldn't suggest adding it to the article anyway. Most of it looks like WP:OR. - Ahunt (talk) 12:45, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: VWd

message: Were there pre-war 985cc 25ps engines made exist? Rjluna2 (talk) 21:07, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-war Engines 

message: The air-cooled Volkswagen engines had official names/types: For example, the 1192 cm³ engine is called Typ 122 and the 1584 cm³ engine is called Typ 126. However, in the article, the engines are simply named after their displacement. --Jojhnjoy (talk) 18:51, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name/Type of the engine(s)? 

message: it's not obvious for non engineers 213.31.58.108 (talk) 11:32, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks -  - Ahunt (talk) 12:27, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  petrol or diesel? 

message: Recent edits adding "clear" tags have produced a lot of white space into the article which looks really bad. I think we either need to ditch at least some of the surplus of info boxes or get more text to fill the article out. Thoughts? - Ahunt (talk) 12:09, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Tons of white space

message: Aside from the aviation section this article is a now a mass of unsourced text. It needs properly sourcing or it needs stubbing to the sourced text. If no one adds the sources I am happy to stub it. Discussion? - Ahunt (talk) 02:06, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, lacking any objections or, indeed discussion, for the past week I have removed the unsourced text. This can be re-instated at any time as long as proper refs are provided. - Ahunt (talk) 20:35, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hum. This wasn't great. A useful, factual page has had almost all the useful information removed and has now become a large list of aircraft, a secondary use of the page. This would benefit from being reverted. It is less informative now than it was 15 years ago! 83.216.146.123 (talk) 17:50, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced additions
Talk:Absorption spectroscopy

message: Part of this Article is merged from Absorption spectrum : See old talk-page at Talk:Absorption spectrum - - - Steve Quinn (formerly Ti-30X) (talk) 04:56, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk page from merger

message: I'm not sure what absorption spectroscopy means when I'm reading this article. It deals primarily with UV visible spectroscopy when that topic has its own article. This doesn't make any sense. From the looks of it this article needs to get rid of the UV visible section and be clear on its purpose that distinguishes it from other spectroscopy techniques. LostLucidity (talk) 00:55, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing

message: I agree with many previous commenters that the current article does not clarify what is unique about absorption spectroscopy as a topic and contains so many concepts that it is confusing. I think many of the topics touched on are already dealt with well in other articles. I don't, though, think this article should be done away with. I have spent some time working on substantial changes to this article, using the articles on Raman spectroscopy and ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy as my guides. I've put a first draft of the introduction in place and also re-organized the article to show my thoughts on an appropriate organization. I'll continue working on it, and your thoughts and contributions would be greatly appreciated. ronningt (talk) 21:52, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Refocus and Clarify

message: There is a line in the absorption spectrum section which I find extremely confusing:
Radiation is more likely to be absorbed at frequencies that match the energy difference between two quantum mechanical states of the molecules.
If you follow the link to quantum mechanical states it still makes little to no sense. Can we simplify this a little? Paskari (talk) 17:08, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Absorption Spectrum Section confusing

message: Not the slightest hint that any human discovered this process. What? One day an astronomer walked into the observatory, and there on the bench was a spectrometer, with an unsigned note explaining how to use it? Yep, I am being sarcastic. How about someone who knows writing a "History" section. I came here to get that information. Nick Beeson (talk) 00:36, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who discovered this 
Talk:RPG Maker

message: Is all types of them close source?Joeleoj123 (talk) 16:54, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it closed source? 

message: *https://web.archive.org/web/20000817192939/http://psx.ign.com:80/news/21210.html
— Preceding unsigned comment added by JimmyBlackwing (talk • contribs) 15:22, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: The sources are not there for standalone notability, either for VX or its re-release, VX Ace. It does not pass WP:GNG.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[RPG Maker VX]] into [[RPG Maker#RPG Maker VX]]
Talk:David Fleischaker

message: This article meets the requirements for start class. Bruin2 (talk) 19:16, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Article assessment
Talk:Ivo Van Damme

message: On the English page is mentioned as place of birth Dendermonde while the Dutch and French mention Brussels.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.200.35.6 (talk) 16:57, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Born BRUSSELS versus DENDERMONDE 
Talk:Katie Kazoo

message: Please use this talk page to explain why this article meets Wikipedia's guidelines on biographies or other guidelines to establish notability of the subject. - CobaltBlueTony 19:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, not familiar with templates and was looking for the appropriate one. This happens to be my daughter's favorite book series right now, and I know the books are fairly popular. If no one else is willing to do a better treatment of it, I'll put one up.--Happylobster 19:23, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:List of political parties in American Samoa

message: theses something wrong with this list. I think it has to do with the fact that it lacks a list.
:I agree.  This is a non-article.  It was apparently generated because of it being standard to have a list of political parties for all nations and recognized sub-national entities, but if American Samoa has no parties, this article serves no purpose and could even be misleading, as someone could see that there was an article about the topic and without checking it assume that there were such.  Should it be put up for deletion with the understanding that if parties are subsequently formed in American Samoa it can then be recreated?  Rlquall 19:12, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I vote that we submit this article for deletion, with the chance to recreate it later. But, on the Index of Political Parties page, there is a link to this page. It does note that there are no parties, but something should be done to prevent a broken link there. Alohasoy 22:06, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing content 

message: Special:whatlinkshere/List of political parties in American Samoa is a long list and difficult to shorten because of the way that  works. We do need something at this title. Let's try a redirect. -- RHaworth 19:29, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  suggestion
Talk:Castres Olympique

message: Please update the players profile.—196.2.20.25 19:16, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medieval Scotland/Royal naming

message: I don't have a firm opinion on the question under discussion (as yet), but I would like to say that I don't think contemporary Welsh "kings" make for a good comparison, for a couple of reasons:  
#There was hardly ever a ruler of the whole of Wales before the Norman Conquest of 1282, and even on the occasions when there was one, his dominance never lasted beyond his own reign.  
#The use of Welsh names in article titles in the English wikipedia is something I have been nervous about all along (and in fact I started the Hywel Dda article as "Howell the Good").  But the fact is that Welsh names are the most commonly used nowadays, even in histories written by monoglot English speakers, and the use of "Howell the Good", "Owen Glendower", and so on, is virtually obsolete.  However, if someone were to argue the toss, I would find it difficult to defend the current usages.  Gaelic/Scots/Irish is a different matter, because these languages are not as well-established as Welsh now is.  Someone rightly made the point that it may, at some future date, become "normal" to use the Gaelic names, and when that time comes, I would support a move of the articles - but it is still some way off. Deb 19:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Alexander Fraser Tytler, Lord Woodhouselee

message: To my eyes, the quote summarizes pages 464-469 of his book Universal History: From the Creation of the World to the Beginning of the Eighteenth Century which is on Google books at http://books.google.com/books?vid=OCLC02547184
Here he has finished describing the historical arc of Athenian democracy and moved on to the Roman republic where he begins to draw parallels between the two as well as other cultures. Perhaps the reduced quote originated in a review or critique of this book? BTW, it's an excellent read. Jolomo 19:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The text in this section goes through great pains to avoid stating whether or not the quote can be attributed to Alexander Tytler. Amazingly, there is no reference to the analysis on Snopes about this, where claims of authorship on the full statement are individually addressed (see here). I am adding a cited statement to clarify this. --chodges (talk) 18:45, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Upon editing, I see that there was a link to Snopes, but it was easy to miss. I have added a concise, referenced statement summarizing the record at Snopes, and unified the two references. --chodges (talk) 19:03, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotation - Tytler Cycle