Talk:Dugway sheep incident

message: Did somebody reimburse the farmers eventually? Thousands of sheep are worth a lot and the constitution says clearly that private property cannot be taken without just compensation. The article speaks nothing about, even though it is said that "money talks". 91.83.27.181 (talk) 21:48, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: After searching far and wide for confirmation of a statement concerning the Army reimbursing the ranchers for the sheep I think I have found a source that states a payment of around $375,000 was authorized with the Army admitting culpability in the incident following lengthy investigations by the Army, the state of Utah and the U.S. Congress. The author of this book, Al Mauroni, also presents an alternative explanation, he calls a "simple academic exercise". It is intriguing and it starts on page 42 of the above linked book. I will add the information about payment soon.--IvoShandor (talk) 17:21, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Takings clause? 

message: The way I see it there needs to be a section on the various investigations, as well as some expansion of the causes section. Perhaps that section will need to be subdivided to include Mauroni's take about the incident being exaggerated and pushed by the media. I will list sources below with any notes.
*Mauroni's book: America's Struggle with Chemical . . ., book includes Mauroni's alternative take as well as great detail about the investigation and army admissions during said investigations.
*True Warnings and False Alarms, by Allan Mazur, discusses the effect of the incident on the activism of the Colorado Committee for Environmental Information
*Another Boffey article from Science
In addition there are several articles that should be developed out of this.
*Albert J. Mauroni: 
*Colorado Committee for Environmental Information
*1969 Rocky Flats Plant fire
More to come.
--IvoShandor (talk) 18:16, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for improvement and expansion

message: * The article states that the report, released to the public 30 years after the fact, was the first admission of use of Nerve agents at Dugway.  However, the Tribune article, towards the end, states there was a Press Release in 1968.  My Grandfather, Jesse Stay, wrote that Press Release, and I believe that was the first admission - way back in 1968.  The wording is a bit confusing.  Also, is there any documentation on the Press Release that could be added? Jesse Stay (talk) 08:56, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tribune Article and "First Admission"

message: There is no link back to the film Rage (1972 film).174.100.209.41 (talk) 02:46, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie link 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Dugway sheep incident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100706204752/http://www.armyhistory.org/ahf2.aspx?pgID=877&id=133&exCompID=56 to http://www.armyhistory.org/ahf2.aspx?pgID=877&id=133&exCompID=56
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:26, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified