lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Series 80 (software platform)

message: Can anyone confirm the browser is derived from Opera?
I have been toying with a PHP generated page and CSS, and found out that the User-Agent string does not match at all the way it is supposed to look like according to http://www.mobileopera.com/reference/ua (specifically the PLATFORM; DEVICE;BUILD parts mentioned there are way off and there is no Opera Version or Language part altogether) --Filipvr 10:56, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Look at here: http://www.opera.com/products/mobile/products/9210i/
Nokia 9210's browser's engine is Opera's, but the user interface is Nokia's. Nokia 9300, 9300i and 9500 are self-evident as they have the Opera folder under C:\System\Apps\.
88.195.40.246 16:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Browser origin

message: Hello. Is this operating system better or worse than s60? You won't believe that im sending this from a nokia (e52). If anyone sees this and you have some knowledge, could you take 5 minutes to advise if i should or shouldn't buy the nokia 9500 communicator? Thanks! :-)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.169.222.70 (talk) 10:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  comparison
Talk:Dior

message: The overall quality of the article is rather low. A large part of it is dedicated to rather irrelevant criticism; for example, some local criticism in India is given an entire heading and section. It would seem as if some users (no doubt well-intentioned) think that every minor criticism deserves full coverage. That thinking violates WP:DUE. If a controversy receives wide media coverage, such as the Galliano controversy, it probably is due. If there's only minor media coverage, then most likely it is not due for what is a global and major company. Unless there are any objections, I'll do a major clean-up. I'll leave it for a few days if there are comments. Jeppiz (talk) 21:43, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor quality  

message: The criticism section contained both well-sourced and relevant controversies, but also some that seemed very minor and not reported in any source meeting WP:RS. For Dior, as for any other company, we should certainly report on major controversies (such as the Galliano controversy for Dior) but not every single piece of news, as per both WP:NOTNEWS and WP:DUE. This is especially true for poorly sourced material. Jeppiz (talk) 10:54, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism section 

message: — Assignment last updated by Olivia0831 (talk) 00:16, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 200 - Thu

message: This Dior article states "Dior holds 42.36% shares and 59.01% of voting rights within LVMH" and the 
LVMH page says "Dior holds 42.36% shares and 59.01% of voting rights within LVMH".
I'm missing something; this seems like a cross-ownership issue that should be flagged.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.180.228.131 (talk) 01:58, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who Owns Who?
Talk:List of company and product names derived from Indigenous peoples

message: Why is the first letter of "indigenous" in capitals? 203.214.17.99 11:02, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the word denotes an ethnic group, and the names of all ethnic groups are capitalized.  See List of ethnic groups for a full list of capitalized examples. Kurieeto 16:11, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See  for a differing point of view. 167.107.191.217 (talk) 21:22, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Adam Słodowy

message: what has this inventor invented?
:Many things.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.5.214.12 (talk) 12:36, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Peredelkino

message: This article makes the place sound innocuous, whereas http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/during-cold-war-cia-used-doctor-zhivago-as-a-tool-to-undermine-soviet-union/2014/04/05/2ef3d9c6-b9ee-11e3-9a05-c739f29ccb08_allComments.html?ctab=all_& makes it sound like a sort of prison. 211.225.33.104 (talk) 02:13, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forced residencies
Talk:Royal Saint-Hubert Galleries

message: So, when did it actually open? I can't figure it out. There's something about 1845 and nine years, but it's not clear if the nine refers to the earlier date of 1836 or 1845. And then it says it took 18 months to build, but again, there's no date on either the start of end of construction. So does this one really predate the one in Russia or not? And if it does, THAT article needs to be changed. Maury 12:48, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it's clear from the text that the structure in Brussels preceded the one in Russia. Please be bold and make whatever changes you think necessary. --Ghirla | talk 12:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Thomas Brownrigg

message: Why is this included in his name at the start of the article? This article covers his whole life, and he clearly wasn't "Retired" while he was on active service! 86.136.251.177 (talk) 00:31, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article starts with his titles, qualifications and honours at the point he died. Rewind to any point before his death and you remove a title. Eventually you get back to when he wasn't retired. Rewind further and he's just Tom Brownrigg, Esq. We need to pick a point for his honours and I think death is that point (also, this is how the sources say he referred to himself, with RN (Rtd) at the end). Anything else is inconsistent or requires a section describing his honours and titles: it's just easier to get them out of the way at the start. ⇦REDVƎRS⇨ 17:18, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "(Retired)"? 
Talk:National Kidney Foundation Singapore scandal

message: If it's ok I'll put my narration up. Thanks!-- 陈鼎翔  贡献 Chat with Tdxiang on IRC! 08:33, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Still in the proccess of expansion. Narrate it when done. Thanks :P --Terence Ong 14:51, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Narration? 

message: Wasn't Richard Yong caught on July 4 in Hong Kon and extraidited back to Singapore in August 3?
Article: reg[]
218.186.9.3 13:45, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard Yong 

message: Was there something in the "Revelations" section that is now deleted?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.0.181.139 (talk) 09:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revelations - of what? 

message: Susan Long is retard because i cannot find. No offense but i have to be frank. 42.60.254.205 (talk) 06:57, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: ...
Talk:Rupert Hart-Davis

message: The slab of genealogy needs to be broken up and distributed to some other pages, where those exist for the people in question certainly. For example we have Duff Cooper and his father. Charles Matthews 11:21, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Distribute

message: The article does not state whether or not his widow is still alive; the marriages section only states that she outlived him. Does anyone know? Werdnawerdna (talk) 18:01, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Widow

message: The work mentioned here was published long after Rupert Hart-Davis's retirement in 1963. I think it should be removed, unless anyone objects. Tim riley (talk) 14:49, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science fiction
Talk:Yitzchok Dovid Groner

message: "through the Yeshivah Centre"
YDG has nothing to do with Yeshiva Centre. Unless there is another one in Melb.? Ems2 11:34, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: hu?

message: This google seach demonstrates that "Yitzchok Dovid Groner" -wiki -answers -encycl -columbia -arikah -feedbus -blogspot -blog -brainyencyclopedia -quickseek -breathittteens -wikipedia.  (talk · contribs · [ logs] · block user · [ block log]) 05:23, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not notable 
Talk:Michael Mandel (economist)

message: There are two Michael Mandels - an economist and a law professor.  This article has mixed them into one, with biographical facts taken from both.
*I plan to restore the stuff about the lawyer to its own article, but for now it looks like the edit history is temporarily lost. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 11:46, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake 

message: Be careful, there is also a software programmer BS/MS Carnegie Mellon with experience at LucasArts Entertainment, Microsoft and Apple see http://www.docstoc.com/docs/75111384/Resume-Michael-Mandel.  Also Michael Mandel communications coach at http://www.m2powered.com/images/resume.pdf.  I was looking for MM the ecconomists c.v.Danleywolfe (talk) 12:17, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  yet another michael mandel 

message: I've added some content and citations for the content that was there. I'm not finding much more. Perhaps this should be nominated for deletion?
Mollifiednow (talk) 19:46, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded and added sourcing
Talk:Tag cloud

message: I don't know how to solve it myself, but if you click in the link for the Wordle (2021/2022 game) you are redirected to the Tag Cloud page. 45.165.160.126 (talk) 05:09, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  problem with redirecting 

message: Claiming "wordle" is used to mean "tag cloud" appears to be entirely unsubstantiated. This alone justifies  and/or . Probably  as well, since the claim appears to be based entirely on a single Thai site's usage. 
Please add a discussion of "wordle" (specifically) to the body of the article, and supply reliable sources (preferably established, English-language, ones) that also demonstrate why "wordle" merits being mentioned in the lead, or all of this (including the hat note over at Wordle) gets deleted. CapnZapp (talk) 19:23, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  wordle
Talk:Art Rooney

message: Here is a link substantiating the fact that Rooney won the money that he used to buy the team.
http://www.delcotimes.com/site/index.cfm?BRD=1675&dept_id=18170&newsid=16042063&PAG=461&rfi=9
The Succession Box is kind of useless. Who would have thought that the 1964 team came after the 1963 and before the 1965! What does it add?--BillFlis 03:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Misc.

message: I've heard both that he was a staunch Republican and a Democrat.  Given his personality, I very much doubt he would have changed his political affiliations.  Anyone know for sure?  Should this be included?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.49.34.200 (talk) 03:19, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political Affiliation? 

message: Is that right?  I thought Chuck Noll coached all those teams.  (24.131.65.135 (talk) 05:28, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the heck does it say "Head Coaching Record" in the sidebar? 

message: A Pittsburgh Post-Gazette article from 1988 (at the time of his death) entitled "Steelers' Art Rooney in retrospect" states that "Rooney later attended Georgetown and Duquesne universities and Washington & Jefferson College."  I was unable to find any other source indicating that Rooney had attended Washington & Jefferson College.  That didn't appear in any of his obituaries, nor could I find it in Rooney: A Sporting Life.  According to a college archivist at Washington & Jefferson, "I checked our Archives and could not find any record of his attendance here."  It's unclear where the author of the 1988 article got his information, but I can't find confirmation anywhere.--GrapedApe (talk) 12:13, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  W&J College 
Talk:Frank Schilling

message: There were several additions wrt Cybersquatting without wikilinking the (admittedly poor) article by one IP, reverted in as many  undo-clicks by another IP. What remains is "domainer" + "commercial registrants" without any cybersquatting. I'm unconvinced that this spam BLP should exist at all, and if it exists, that it should be censored right down to what appears to be various WP:SPA socks editing this page in the direction of "domainer": I've added +. –Be..anyone (talk) 04:56, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unmitigated spam 

message: This guy's page has been nominated for deletion, updated and vandalized on several occasions. Yet the entries on this page mirror other public records and are well documented. I'm troubled by the witch-hunt and lack of dilineation by detractors between cybersquatting (targeting brands) with domaining (investment in generic names). The latter is legitimate. If this guys contributions aren't worth of a wikipedia entry then I'm giving up on editing. (talk)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.144.94.21 (talk) 02:41, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Frank? --Soulman (talk) 14:52, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jealousy target 

message: The article's prose mentions "American", the infobox says he was born in Germany, and there are Canada-related categories. Say what? ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:26, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality?
Talk:Bon Accord F.C.

message: I wonder if this page ought to be moved to another title - "Bon Accord F.C." isn't really accurate, as that implies that the "F.C." was part of their official name in some way. Perhaps Bon Accord (football team)? — sjorford (talk) 12:00, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Has anyone any proof that Arbroath were drawn against Orion?  There is a reference in contemporary press to there being a "Bon-Accord" [sic] team in Aberdeen before the fateful game, and the whole premise of there being a cricket club changing its name is based on the real Orion not ever wondering what had happened to their Cup entry, and there being an unlikely and unauthorized change of name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by In Vitrio (talk • contribs) 16:53, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Cricket' club
Talk:List of humorists

message: You may want to organize these by country.  Just my two cents. Rilr 12:04, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization 

message: I've created Wikipedia:Notability (comedy) to help editors in deciding the notability of comedy- and humor-related articles. Please help hammer it into shape. --Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 09:01, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Answers.com mirrors content from Wikipedia, therefore the list originates here, and is then shown there. Dreaded Walrus  t c 22:02, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia:Notability (comedy) 

message: Is there any particular reason why these names are alphabetized by first name rather than last name? This seems unusual to me. –BMRR (talk) 01:08, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems unusual to me too.  I favor re-ordering by last name.  --Born2cycle (talk) 18:05, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm... I wonder if there is an automated way to fix this... or will I have to wait for a rainy day and just do it manually... –BMRR (talk) 18:23, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alphabetical order 

message: I like this list, but some names are a bit puzzling: I would have thought that Jimmy Carr and Bill Hicks were primarily stand-up comics, they seem a out of place here. Not sure about George Carlin either. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 08:24, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria? 

message: Should not Larry Thompson (humorist) be in the list of humorists?   Fleejoseph (talk) 06:29, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No need.  The Larry Thompson already listed on the page is Larry Thompson (humorist).Shortsword (talk) 13:46, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Larry Thompson humorist to list 

message: The article has been tagged as needing citations. None of the names listed here has a citation, proving it belongs on the list. Lists like this one very easily become indiscriminate, in this case by editors not understanding that a comedian (stand-up performer, often actors) is not necessarily a humorist (most famous example is Mark Twain; these are literate people, most often writers.)
Some improvement suggestions:
*If citations can't be found, there should at least be short descriptions of each entry, showing why they belong on the list.
*It has been suggested that the list be broken up, e.g. by nationality.
*Red links definitely shouldn't be put here; there is absolutely no way of verifying if such a name belongs. There is also WP:NOTABILITY to observe. JustinTime55 (talk) 19:27, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited, indiscriminate list
Template talk:SBGI

message: For some reason, the NASDAQ Category is on every station with the template.....should we fix that? --CFIF 12:17, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. --CFIF 12:19, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NASDAQ cat 

message: I don't see any explanation to what the superscript JV in this template means at all. Can someone explain and add what it means in it like with the other superscript notes? 72.68.110.229 (talk) 03:50, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Joint Venture. BilCat (talk) 04:48, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of JV superscript note
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels/NewArticles

message: */NewArticles - New Articles discussions (only use the page talk for page related discussion)
This is to record as part of the New Articles pages to output from this project. Comment and talk on it's content should go in here. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page) 12:20, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Articles talk 

message: Should novel articles newly added to the project be listed here? For example, the articles for the books in the Kushiel's Legacy trilogy have been around for over a year, but I have recently added them to the WikiProject for some work. I did not create the pages myself. FAE 10:15, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is as a notice board to highlight the "New" articles that we have produced, or had a very large hand in producing. So some are marked heavily revised (mine I have to confess). But this is to give some idea of how much work / contributino we are putting in and gives others an idea of what is new and needs review. Does that help. If you have a newly "tagged" article that you would like us all to look at try adding it to the /worklist ( I keep a watch on that page) and perhaps specifically notifying a few project editors. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page) 10:34, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, that helps clarify, thanks! FAE 01:27, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newly created vs newly added 

message: I've taken the liberty of adding a number of articles that I have created recently as part of a project to do articles on all of Leslie Charteris's Saint novels. Feel free to add to what I've written! 23skidoo 20:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New additions
Talk:Saša Papac

message: j.. savez, nek si ti nama dos'o...!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.15.200.209 (talk) 20:55, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is [this] edit at neutral point of view? JeremyMcClean (Talk) 22:25, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral point of view?
Talk:Aurora Quezon

message: I moved this article from "Aurora A. Quezon" to "Aurora Quezon", since there doesn't seem to be a need for the middle initial to disambiguate. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names). Coffee 12:25, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can anyone provide an actual source for her being given the title "Servant of God" by the Catholic Church or that the beatification process actually began? I can't find anything. The one source being provided is a reddit thread (not a RS), which doesn't even mention the title - just points to a change.org petition. The one thing I can find, following a link from the petition to this self-published site is that the cause was stopped at the Diocese of Cubao level, and that the Bishop of Cubao was not able to act on the petition. So it never even made it to the CCS. As I'm not a Catholic, maybe I've missed something. But right now, this claim is not verifiable and should be removed. --FyzixFighter (talk) 15:46, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Servant of God status
Talk:Noil

message: There is also a play called Noil and it is a modern melodrama.  (From edit summary dated 6 February 2006.)  The actual edit was the addition of a signature to the article page, which has been removed.  Edit was by 212.85.15.67
-- Lini 12:36, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Noil (play)
Talk:Ebony Rainford-Brent

message: This is possibly the greatest name I have ever heard. Note that there's a Cricinfo article about an award she won, but for some reason I can only get to it via the Google cache. — sjorford (talk) 12:41, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of political parties in Morocco

message: *the word "force" seems to me a little overdosed.
*the prime minister is nominated by the king, but in 1998, he was the leader of the party that won most of the votes, in 2002, he was a technocrat. It is a matter of debate in Morocco.
* the governement is nomited by the king on proposition from the prime minister. Actually the coalition parties nogotiate the number of ministers from each party and which ministry they take, and propose their candidates to the prime minister to propose them to the king. This does not apply to the ministries of foreign affairs, and interior.--SteveLo 10:44, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nominations

message: *If we want to include both POVs, we should state from which side. Otherwise, the sentence would look contradictory as was the case of the previous. The term "occupation" if used should be stated clearly that it is from the Polisartio point of view, and the "southern provinces" is from Moroccan point of view.
* if we want to be clean from bias, and show the neutral view, we state that the sovereignity issue is not resolved, the territory is disputed between the Polisario front and Morocco, and that the UN is trying to find a political solution to the conflict. But I think that on the page of Moroccan political parties, supposed to give a list of them, to go on such depth on Western Sahara is clearly an intentionned manner to "hijack" subject.  --SteveLo 10:44, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Western Sahara

message: Are there any pro-berber parties?--Kaiyr (talk) 20:36, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pro-berber party 
Talk:Military Action Against Iraq (Parliamentary Approval) Bill

message: What does this mean?
As a result, the second reading was postponed from 16 April until 23 July 1999. Due to the Crown's refusal to signify its consent to the bill, it was ultimately automatically dropped before it obtained its second reading.
Surely, it was automatically dropped immediately the Crown refused consent? If not, then is it not the case that Dalyell knew he had no option but to manually pull the bill before it's scheduled second appearance?
Put simply, how can it automatically be dropped even though they were able to move the 2nd reading? My guess is that Dalyell was going to keep putting the date back until he could get consent, but then gave up. Aaron McDaid (talk - contribs)  12:42, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect you are right: the Bill could not proceed to Second Reading without Crown consent.  The first time the order for Second Reading came up for debate, Dayell was there to propose a new date (Hansard, 16 April 1999).  The second time the order for Second Reading came up, it seems that Dayell was not there to propose a new date, so it was dropped (Hansard, 23 July 1999).  The next Weekly Information Bulletin (29 July 1999) then says: 1R: 26.1.99 (Dropped).  All of these links were already in the article, but I have taken the opportuniuty to clarify. HTH. -- ALoan (Talk) 13:10, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: automatically or manually dropped?
Talk:Richard Allinson

message: I have checked BBC Radio Oxford's schedule today, and gthey no longer broadcast Allinson's Albums. Can this be mentioned in the relevant section? Also, it looks like he is also no longer on Radio York either, which just leaves Radio Cumbria. Quizman1967 (talk) 16:12, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allinson's Albums