Talk:Holder in due course

message: I removed the AfD tag because I think that holder in due course is a sufficiently important topic in the law of negotiable instruments (itself an important topic in commercial law) to justify its own article.  If it is to be considered for deletion, it should go through the formal AfD process, but my own view is that it would not be appropriate for deletion at all. --Legis (talk - contribs) 16:48, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to clarify - not saying that this article is good - far too stubby and limited in geographical focus; not accessible to lay people.  But still sufficiently notable. --Legis (talk - contribs) 16:49, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed AfD tag

message: In the text, "The latter would assert that it is an HDC and therefore not responsible for any defects in the TV or for any misrepresentations about it that the retailer made to the consumer. (A car is a bad SI example because liens are indicated on title, not by a separate SI.)" it's not really clear what "TV" stands for...
GregBlock (talk) 01:30, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Defects in the TV" 

message: The last line in the first P. reads, 
*"B may then sue A for non-performance, but is still obligated to pay the original obligation to C."  
But it should say:
*"A may then sue B for non-performance, but is still obligated to pay the original obligation to C."
since it was A who was originally obligated.  I will change.  But please change back if you have a qualm with this.  If you change back, please provide explanation.
Piratejosh85 (talk) 16:52, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Example is wrong.

message: virtually every commercial law text sets out a specific, concise statement of the requirements to be considered an hdc: value given, good faith, without notice, etc. this article does not. any particular reason? Toyokuni3 (talk) 23:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requirements 

message: The link in the first reference is dead.WannaBeEditor (talk) 05:50, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Link Comment 

message: The page title should be properly capitalized, i.e. "Holder in Due Course" rather than "Holder in due course"... but that is not a minor edit which a casual editor can make. idfubar (talk) 00:33, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the suggestion, but that's not really in line with the Wikipedia Manual of Style. It is often, perhaps even mostly, not capitalized. II | (t - c) 03:52, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Title Not Properly Capitalized 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Holder in due course. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121128024402/http://www.pstcc.edu/departments/lat/classes/2300/notes/chap23.htm to http://www.pstcc.edu/departments/lat/classes/2300/notes/chap23.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:59, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified