Talk:Mitsubishi

message: Okay, so where does "Mitsubishi Pencil Co, Ltd." (brand name Uni-Ball) fit into all this (if at all)? - makomk 12:29, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pencils 

message: *The photos of the cars should be moved to the appropriate pages.
*Discussion of the brand should be expanded.
Christopher Mahan 17:42, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  mitsubishi reorg 

message: I think the sites critical to mitsubishi should be moved to Mitsubishi Motors Corporation, since this is really about that. Comments? Christopher Mahan 03:53, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mitsubishi critical sites 

message: Christopher Mahan noted that NEC/Mitsubishi is a subsidarary of NEC. But NEC is still using the name "Mitsubishi" on monitors, and in the name. So somebody looking for information on Mitsubishi's computer display unit might come to this article. THe problem is, I'm not sure where to put the link. Reub2000 05:06, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think perhaps there should be a page or section for companies that have the mitsubishi name. This is probably in there somewhere. I would also look at the mitsubishi category. Christopher Mahan 17:12, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NEC/Mitsubishi 

message: I would like to know the story with Mitsubishi Pencil and Mitsubishi. The Mitsubishi site says that Mitsubishi Pencil is of completely independent origin to Mitsubishi itself. So then why does it use the 3-diamond logo, which it registered in 1903? It used the logo in 1940's for example (I saw it in a 1940's baseball card) and I have seen it on uni-ball pens circa 2000, but it has since disappeared from those. But the japanese website still has the logo. 
I know that the Japanese version of Wikipedia gives some detail about the logo  (mitsubishi pencil vs mitsubishi, under the heading of mitsubishi pencil. But the auto translation is not satisfactory.
I have always loved everything mitsubishi, including the GT3000 car, the twin engined aircraft they used to make, the air conditioners and also including the pens. Was quite sad when the pens dropped the 3 diamond logo and now to find that they are unrelated to the cars etc. Maybe they should link up again. What is the story??
:It apparently has to do with some family crests (Mitsubishi as I understand means "three diamonds"). The families of the two companies also seem to be related by marriage somehow... I read with Google translate as well but here are the links: Japanese Wikipedia 1, Japanese Wikipedia 2, Japanese Wikipedia 3, mpuni.co.jp 123popos123 (talk) 04:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: @123popos123 I think the Mitsubishi Pencil article takes mention of the family crests. Maybe this one should also rather than just saying that they aren't related. Panamitsu (talk) Please ping on reply 11:34, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mitsubishi Pencil 

message: I just flagged this article as violating Wikipedia's Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view guidelines.  Despite the fact that Mitsubishi is a current, major conglomerate, the majority of the article focuses on the group's involvement in World War II (which is not especially unique amongst Japanese companies) and even includes a lengthy citation from the not-exactly-objective website MitsubishiSucks.com.
Can't we do better than this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stephen Hui (talk • contribs) 04:15, 26 June 2006.
Completely agreed.  Many companies contributed to the Japanese effort in WWII, including Mitsubishi.  It should be mentioned, however references to sites such as Mitsubishisucks are overboard.  The article needs to be an overall look at the company, not just what happened in a 5 year period.--Darlac425 04:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral point of view 

message: I guess that the solution for this dispute could be the making of a complete new article named "Mitubishi History" or something like that...
--Vitor Madeira 14:54, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A solution ?

message: if you look at the Mitsubishi global website and read the about page, it is clear that Mitsbishi is NOT a conglomerate. It even states that it is "impossible to define"! It certainly does not fit with what I understand as a conglomerate. 
http://www.mitsubishi.com/e/group/about.html
Myredroom 12:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A Conglomerate ?

message: Does the logo REALLY need to be so huge? It's not like there's much detail or anything comlicated that is more obvious with it being larger.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.152.208.1 (talk) 21:33, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. I think it was image vandalism. Cheers! TN‑X-Man 21:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Giant Logo? 

message: Sorry, but the 5th-largest elevator company of the world can be confused with an automobile brand. The consequence: The 5th-largest elevator company of the world is absent from many European countries. --84.61.173.207 (talk) 18:23, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion 

message: Can a thing similar to the Mitsubishi logo be found on the Leaning Tower of Pisa? --84.61.155.241 (talk) 20:19, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mitsubishi logo 

message: Daimler is majority owner of MFTBC since 2003 and now owns 89.25% in MFTBC or Fuso. With "Mitsubishi" (who exactly?) owning 10,25% only I doubt they are part of the Group. It appears they do every effort to make forget the desasterous past as a part of Mitsubishi Motors without offending those who remember or even value Mitsubishi Motors. Furthermore I am not sure about the companys name nowadays. --Wolle1303 (talk) 22:48, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  MFTBC part of Mitsubishi ?