Talk:Nap (disambiguation)

message: This article has been listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion in the past. See /deletion for the discussion archive.
==Is a nap also when your hair has a heavliy matted knot?
Eazy-E seemed to think so:
 Pulled to the house get her out of the pad
 And the bitch said something to make me mad
 She said somethin' that I couldn't believe
 So I grabbed the stupid bitch by her nappy ass weave
[The previous unsigned comment was posted by , 23:43, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The word "nap" surely has many other definitions than those given here, but until there is an article relating to that definition there is no need to add it to the disambiguation page; doing so will simply frustrate readers who will look for an article link and not find one. Wikipedia is not Wiktionary. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 22:10, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

message: I made this edit in an effort to cleanup the DAB page according to WP:MoSDAB.  Usually I leave a summary of reasons for my specific changes, but this one was so complex (and possibly controversial), I thought I'd explain here.  Hoof Hearted (talk) 18:28, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  July 25, 2008 Cleanup 

message: There is a card game called "Nap" that is mentioned in Three Men in a Boat by Jerome K. Jerome. This is actually short for "Napoleon". This should be mentioned here. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 19:56, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Card game called Nap

message: Currently  is a redirect to this disambiguation page. Since section 1 deals exclusively with things abbreviated "NAP", and the other sections to things nearly exclusively called "Nap", I think it is reasonable to split them out into two DABs per WP:CONSPLIT. (However, that refers to articles rather than other pages.)
There are several other NAPs (National Action Plans) which are not on this DAB: see Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_24#National_action_plans. It's possible, of course, to create a DAB at National Action Plan, but that would seem a worse "split". I am unsure whether to add those titles to the DAB while that discussion, and this, are underway.
I think the two discussions are reasonably distinct, so to have both concurrently is not ideal, but probably better than waiting or boldly adding the entries here only to remove them soon after. Si Trew (talk) 10:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it makes sense to split this.  As a disamb page it is intended to cover a diverse set of topics and enable readers to easily find what they are looking for.  Making users figure out which is the right disambiguation page to go to would not support that goal.  WP:CONSPLIT really does not apply in this case, since having multiple distinct topics on the page is the whole point of the page.  I don't think the page, as is, is overly long.  Is there any precedent for splitting a disambiguation page into two for different capitalization? meamemg (talk) 16:34, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

text: Oppose. There are examples of dab pages that are and aren't split up. As long as it doesn't get unmanageably long, I don't see a need. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:05, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed split to NAP