Talk:William Langer

message: I remember reading somewhere that during the Second World War Langer was asked by the US OSS to draw up a psychological profile of Adolf Hitler. Does this warrant a mention? Does anyone know what his conclusions were?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.194.74.92 (talk) 13:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: no that's Harvard famous history professor William L. Langer. Rjensen (talk) 04:22, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Langer's psycological profile of Adolf Hitler

message: This phrase appears to be unique to Wikipedia; Google search on "north dakota rebellion" reveals one hit, a wordspam site. The incident is minor and can easily be folded into Langer's article, which could use the meat anyway. | Klaw Talk 00:53, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: North Dakota Rebellion

message: I removed the sentence "In 1950, 'Wild Bill' filibustered for 29 hours, and 53 minutes on September 22 to 23.  The filibuster was for the veto of a Communist registration bill." It wasn't cited and it does not appear on any list of the longest filibusters ever (which list Strom Thurmond's 24 hour, 18 minute one as the longest).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.205.82.133 (talk) 06:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Filibuster

message: With citations. I've attempted to help add some facts regarding what happened regarding Langer's trials/conviction/appeal/acquittal.  My primary reference is a book written by a former State Supreme Court Justice.  I'm trying to consolodate all of the citations into one footnote number and can't seem to get it accurate.  Any help would be appreciated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ab2kgj (talk • contribs) 15:56, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding Langer's Trials 

message: (Too lazy to make an account). Is it just me or are the first two paragraphs in the controversy section worded in a manner that's rather, well, seeming to try to paint the charges against Langer in a ridiculously negative light? I mean, maybe saying that it was presided over by his political opponents, and noting the wording then letting the reader draw their own conclusions would work, but saying "it's important to note that" such and such is true (WP:Editorializing) and saying that the judge gave "heavily biased" instructions to the jury make me question the NPOVness of that section, never mind the title of the book cited--108.85.148.69 (talk) 04:05, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Bias in Wikipedia means an editor deliberately ignoring contrary evidence. I see no bias by any editor here. the rule is that Wikipedia follows the reliable sources, in this case Robert Vogel, (2004). Unequal Contest: Bill Langer and His Political Enemies (by a ND judge). If an editor has found a different perspective in another reliable source, then it should be added. Rjensen (talk) 04:22, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias in the controversy section 

message: Langer, the isolationist, became a nazi apologist after World War II. To the point where he accused the U.S. government of a "savage and fanatical plot" to kill millions of German women and children. 'Denying the Holocaust: the Growing Assault on Truth and Memory,' Deborah E. Lipstadt, New York, Free Press, 1993, p.42.
In trying to blame the U.S. for the ethnic cleansing of Germans from Eastern Europe, Langer managed to display ignorance and bigotry. 
He repeatedly argued that we should have fought the Russians not the Germans if we had to get involved.
Hesweeney (talk) 05:39, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nazi apologist 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on William Langer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071201112320/http://hungarianhistory.com/lib/vardy/vardy.doc to http://hungarianhistory.com/lib/vardy/vardy.doc
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:24, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on William Langer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040820090606/http://www.und.edu/dept/library/Collections/Langer/og19.html to http://www.und.edu/dept/library/Collections/Langer/og19.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following was left on the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard talk page in this edit where it was collapsed as off-topic. It is being copied here for such attention, if any, that it may deserve. It should be noted that the book mentioned is apparently this self-published source which would not be an acceptable source under the self published source policy. — TransporterMan (TALK) 20:35, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments