Talk:Agricultural extension

message: Well, hello there. I'm Jerichi and I'll be your Good Article reviewer today.
While I'm quite impressed by this article, it has some things that need doing. I shall give you a list of things to be done to improve this article, at least in my opinion. The "-" indicates that something needs fixing, the "=" indicates that it is of decent quality, and the "+" indicates that it is of great quality, but mind you, this doesn't mean it is perfect. If there is a "~" next to it, that means it is borderline with the next rating. "=~" would be borderline "+" and "=" for example.
#It is well written.
#:a (Prose: The article follows a pretty consistant style, and seems to be written well. My only issue is the "Communication processes within extension systems" section. The last portion of it is written in an  unencyclopedic way, to me at least. Questions in an encyclopidea does not seem right. I would suggest rewriting that section if possible to get rid of the questions and adress the issue of "who decides" in a less, well, question like manner.): Verdict: -    (issue now addressed ike9898 18:35, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is exciting!  I will add references for the communication processes section, but it may take a couple of weeks.  I am away from my library. I admit this section is bordering on original work; the typology has only been published in one document (NAFES, 2005), but there are other references that point in the same direction. If I can't come up with enough, I guess we may have to rewrite. I don't see any problems with the other suggestions. Cheers.  APB-CMX 16:17, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  That is fine. As long as a good deal of it is taken care of, I'll pass the article. However, if it is not dealt with in a timely fashion, it may be cut from good article status. They run a tight shift, so you may want to prevent that from happening by keeping it the best you can so they won't have to even think of doing so. Jeri-kun 22:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Article Review; December 17, 2006

message: As the result of a GA Sweeps Review which can be found here this article has been delisted. The major problem is the lack of inline citations, as now required by the good article criteria. The article can be nominated at WP:GAN as soon as the issues raised in the review have been fixed. If you do not agree with the decision to delist this article, then you can ask for the decision to be reconsidered at WP:GAR. Thanks for all the work done so far. --Malleus Fatuorum 16:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review

message: I have just noted a number of changes made by an unsigned user 41.204.224.26 on 01 February 2009 that added the term 'technician' throughout the article. This included editing quotes and definitions from various references. These edits are not consistent with the terminology used in the literature on agricultural extension and have resulted in a confusing and grammatical incorrect article.  I am therefore removing these edits.   Cheers. --APB-CMX (talk) 12:27, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Extension' versus 'Extension Technician'

message: I have deleted the entire content of this section for the following reasons. 1. It is a large chunk of the article only about India. 2. It is not formatted in the correct style. 3. It is out of context and does not follow logically from the previous text and 4. The writing standard is not very good. Roundtheworld (talk) 17:44, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted content inserted by Pradeepsyird

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Agricultural extension. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090416210130/http://newarrivals.nlb.gov.sg:80/itemdetail.aspx?bid=12303638 to http://newarrivals.nlb.gov.sg/itemdetail.aspx?bid=12303638
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203020932/http://www.farms2firms.org/ to https://www.farms2firms.org
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified