lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Riverside, Harford County, Maryland

message: Just watch out with their new parking lot.  Very deep dip on one entrance, ripped off the parts of my car when entering.  Enter by the 7-11. Rurik 15:34, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ruby Tuesday 

message: Belcamp is South of Rt.40
It is basically the campus of what was Bata Shoe.  Now is the home of many government contracting companies serving Aberdeen Proving Ground. 
  
Riverside is North of Rt.40
The locations are being misquoted do to the fact that the US post office is not putting the miss labeled mail in the dead letter box. This text needs to be less misleading.  The disgrace is that Google Maps labels Riverside as Belcamp. Google maps Riverside  Quoting the Post office manhandling protocol as the source of there label.
I live in Belcamp. At the Rt.40 end of Bata Boulevard Just across the Baltimore and Ohio tracks is a 2x2x8 foot post that printed Riverside On the south side indicating this is the south border of Riverside.google.com/maps/Belcamp street view I can not make out the writing, But have seen the letters clearly in real life.  I should park my car and look at the back side, I bet there is the text Belcamp.
Also look at the Census map on this main page the south edge is straight line. 
that edge is Rt.40. South of that edge is Belcamp, To the north is Riverside not Belcamp. 
The Killer is "However, the original community of Belcamp is located south of U.S. Route 40, outside the Riverside CDP.".  It was A shoe Factory and Still Is Belcamp south of Rt.40.  I saw a reference for this. and will add that the next time I see it.   {Strfry (talk) 05:24, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Belcamp
Talk:Structured investment products

message: This article was proposed for deletion, citing Blatant copyright infringement from http://www.stardem.com/content.asp?contentid=190.  This URL has been reviewed and no copyright infringement was found. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Info@onefinancial.com (talk • contribs) , the article's creator, on 22:32, 21 February 2006.
Structured investment products are better explained on the Structured product page. For that reason this page has been changed into a redirect. Info@onefinancial.com 16:08, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Saar franc

message: I've edited this artcle partly to correct my own earlier error re the 1947 banknotes. I've also deleted the reference to banknotes denominated in francs from the 1954-57 period. Apologies to whoever added that but I can't find any evidence to substantiate it. If you have such evidience, please put the reference back in along with your source, as I'd love to know about such an issue if it existed.Dove1950 17:47, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:WTAP-TV

message: You all need to update the logo on the page because WTAP removed the NBC logo from its logo. Seems like Gray Media is removing the network that a station is affiliated with from its logo and branding. Especially for NBC affiliates. 2601:5C5:4380:FD80:489C:A050:16DE:8685 (talk) 18:14, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  They changed the WTAP logo
Talk:Göttingen Eighteen

message: :The reeasons of their declaration as "Göttingen eightteen" was, that many of them studied at the university of Göttingen and they wanted to remain on the Göttinger Sieben.
I removed this sentence as I could not work out what it meant. Cutler 22:43, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ambiguous sentence

message: "Wolfgang Pauli" is wrong (even though some recently published German documents get that wrong, too)! "Wolfgang Paul" is the correct name, see: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Paul_(Physiker) or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Paul  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.115.12.170 (talk) 20:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in the names list
Talk:List of Muslims/Proposed Organization A

message: Yes, i created all links in Islamic studies. This is what it looked like before i got to it: []. Gues how much credit i got for that? Yeah, the usual amount: Zero (0).
I belive it would be good to have Muslim doctors and include all the things i listed above. Ill list them again:
*More specific text about Muslim doctors, avoiding to much information on Islamic medicine.
*Typical life of the Muslim doctors, in each era. 
*How family relations was affected by being a Muslim doctor, in each era
*How the Muslim doctors got their education, in each era
*The status Muslim doctors enjoied in their community on each era
*Names of some most significant Muslim doctors
*A list of Muslim doctors
Of course is that information available for each individual, but i was aiming at a more comprehensive article about how the Muslim doctor generaly lived, and doing so for each generation. there is a vast difference between the general life of a Muslim doctors now and in the 9th century. And this article could cover that. 
What do you think? --Striver 01:02, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Section break

message: Thanks you joturner, for leaving dialog, not responding to my objections and unilaterally implementing your plan. Of course, i wont just sitt and look while you totaly ignore my efforts to talk.--Striver 11:11, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did respond to your proposal. The comments in the Section break section appeared to me to be a reiteration of your previous comments (and thus would attract the same response from me). Because no one was really responding to the proposal or the idea of reorganization, I decided to opt for the Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. And also, I believe you said in your original post here, "I would like to applaud Joturner for making this proposal. Although i have comments, i love the spirit behind it." I love the spirit behind it? Didn't sound like a complete objection to me. If that was one, I didn't get that from your post. It just appeared to me as though you wanted a different organization system. Create a new one at List of Muslims/Proposed Organization B. joturner 11:25, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm trying to say that you should probably make exactly like what will replace the current List of Muslims article. With List of Muslims/Proposed Organization A, I made exactly what I proposed for the actual page. When I overhauled the List of Muslims page, I just had to copy the code from List of Muslims/Proposed Organization A to List of Muslims and then remove all the comments. If you were to create an exact replica your proposal, I (and others as well) would be able to understand exactly what you're talking about and then potentially propose a List of Muslims/Proposed Organization C that would combine aspects for both organizations. joturner 23:15, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks
Talk:Lewis Arquette

message: Why does this page have a notability template? Arquette was a notable actor in his own right; IMDB has 105 film and tv credits listed for him. Ckessler
I agree.  This was an extremely prolific actor, and he even wrote and produced, as well.Bcsurvivor 17:13, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to superiorpics.com, Lewis's son David is of Russian-French ancestry heritage. Logically, Lewis shares the same heritage. -- Szvest 17:47, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What? Never mind that site. It's a silly trivia website that probably took its info from Wikipedia or some other unreliable source. David Arquette's mother is of Polish Jewish descent. Lewis Arquette is mostly Anglo-Saxon. His paternal grandmother was a direct descendant of Clark of Lewis & Clark! His paternal grandfather, I think was of French Canadian and Swiss descent, but that doesn't really make Lewis Arquette French American. I found this incredible family tree of David Arquette and Courtney Cox on Roots Web  - if you follow Cox's ancestry, she is a descendant of Henry I of England! Mad Jack 20:51, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ancestry

message: Brenda Nowak Arquette was indeed Jewish, but according to IMDB her father was from Russia and arrived here before the Holocaust.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1000:B06A:16EC:1931:7B1B:D07C:D733 (talk) 01:07, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestry II
Talk:Dreamlands

message: ===Kadath history===
*17:46, 21 February 2006 RlyehRising (mrg into Dreamlands, chg to redr)
*16:58, 21 February 2006 RlyehRising (cpyedt, rm non-notable entr)
*14:17, 21 February 2006 152.163.100.13
*14:16, 21 February 2006 152.163.100.13
*11:49, 25 December 2005 Marudubshinki
*07:59, 20 November 2005 148.240.164.99
*14:32, 23 September 2005 84.176.142.220
*13:03, 5 August 2005 206.81.245.136
*08:02, 16 July 2005 CLAES m (interwiki)
*17:29, 23 April 2005 JonasK (added popular bookstore)
*13:36, 9 April 2005 67.188.65.218
*16:12, 1 April 2005 Hailey C. Shannon
*13:17, 26 March 2005 Lachatdelarue (added info)
*09:04, 29 December 2004 JonasK
-,-~R'lyehRising~-,- 22:49, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: *17:46, 21 February 2006 RlyehRising (mrg into Dreamlands, chg to redr)
*16:58, 21 February 2006 RlyehRising (cpyedt, rm non-notable entr)
*14:17, 21 February 2006 152.163.100.13
*14:16, 21 February 2006 152.163.100.13
*11:49, 25 December 2005 Marudubshinki
*07:59, 20 November 2005 148.240.164.99
*14:32, 23 September 2005 84.176.142.220
*13:03, 5 August 2005 206.81.245.136
*08:02, 16 July 2005 CLAES m (interwiki)
*17:29, 23 April 2005 JonasK (added popular bookstore)
*13:36, 9 April 2005 67.188.65.218
*16:12, 1 April 2005 Hailey C. Shannon
*13:17, 26 March 2005 Lachatdelarue (added info)
*09:04, 29 December 2004 JonasK
-,-~R'lyehRising~-,- 22:49, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Kadath]] history

message: *19:20, 6 March 2006 RlyehRising (mrg to Dreamlands, chg to redr, -inuse)
*19:07, 6 March 2006 RlyehRising m (+inuse)
*18:11, 6 March 2006 Brian G. Crawford (merge)
*15:06, 28 December 2005 Akriasas (rv nonsense)
*17:48, 20 December 2005 Wizofaus
*18:23, 24 November 2005 RlyehRising m (misc, +stub, chg cat:"Cthulhu mythos" is dubious)
*23:30, 19 April 2005 Belarius (link)
*22:51, 30 December 2004 SimonP (no longer on VfD, could be merged somewhere)
*16:58, 24 December 2004 Bryan Derksen m (Category:Cthulhu mythos species)
*12:15, 23 December 2004 Kappa (contextualize)
*09:44, 23 December 2004 Fvw
*09:38, 23 December 2004 61.68.92.200 (Zoogs: carnivorous fey vermin of the Dreamlands)
-,-~R'lyehRising~-,- 00:24, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Zoog]] history

message: I think Nodens isn't a great one, he is an elder God. 89.57.1.231 01:52, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nodens 

message: Or to be more precise, the sections "References" and "Creatures" needs improvements. Those stories by Lovecraft which only contains referneces, this needs to be mentioned. The soma goes for those who were written in collaboration with others. I have already started, but others has to complete. In the "Creatures" section, it should be informed who was the first to mention it and/or who was the first to describe it.193.217.196.106 18:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This article needs improvements
Talk:Gym socks

message: I'm new to wikipedia, and i'm not sure if this is considered vandalism. I figured that there should be an article addressing the dirty gym socks cliche, so I made one myself. Please feel free to critisize, improve, or add to the page.But anyways I was just wondering if it was acceptable to write, attempt to would be more acurate, humorous articles or if there is a more appropriate place to post articles like this. UPDATE: As I said I'm new so I'm not sure if I broke the rules by undeleting this page. It was speedily deleted as I was editing it. I undeleted it because I believe that I have fixed all errors.
--Gob the-d00d 22:53, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Outer ear

message: It's phrased in a misleading way as it is. In fact, the only mechanism that is selectively amplifying for sounds around 3kHz is the ear canal, and that only amplifies incoming sound by a factor of two. The total amplification can be up to a factor 100, but that is due to the middle ears functions (the tympani having a 15 times larger area than the oval window, and the lever effect from the ossicles which is like 3x). I'll try to change it to something better later if noone does it before me. --GustenNyberg (talk) 17:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Misleading

message: I think this is not the correct infobox. What we are looking for is  Circeus 19:42, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for catching that. It is now fixed. --Arcadian 21:42, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Improper infobox

message: The first paragraph of this entry seems to be lifted from a textbook. It is not cited, and I wrote which text book it was. Either you can delete it or cite it properly. I'm not familiar with how Wikipedia deals with this so I just wrote it right on the page.  I did not want to delete it without giving reason.However, I found this discussion after I changed the page, so I realize I should have probably done it through the talk page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.99.180.12 (talk) 02:12, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  citing 

message: Needless to have a separate article when the parent article (outer ear) is so sparse, would improve readability and quality of article to display it in one spot, instead of needlessly fragmenting the content. Could be re-expanded at a later date if necessary. LT910001 (talk) 23:24, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: . With no objections, I've performed these mergers. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:10, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Intrinsic muscles of external ear]] 

message: See above LT910001 (talk) 23:24, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Auricular muscles]] 

message: This has to be one of the strangest articles in the Wikipedia, and the discussion is even stranger--all the threads are marked "do not edit."  So I'm starting a new thread.
Why are there two identical pictures from Grey's Anatomy, with different captions?  It would also be nice if the picture of the head's muscles (or the picture of the ear's muscles) could be reversed right-and-left, so the correspondence of the muscles in each corresponds.  It's hard to do the mirror imaging in your mind...  Mcswell (talk) 03:34, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange article
Talk:Baby, The Stars Shine Bright

message: Should the name be in all caps like that, or should we Wikify it, as not an acronym but a proper name? Chris 22:58, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't really sure what wikipedia's stand is on the all caps/Japanese thing. The other article (pre existing)  that mentioned the shop (Shimotsuma Monogatari) had it in all caps, and the official website has the name in all caps, so I made it all caps. Calicore 03:20, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Moved to current page name, see Talk:HANADEKA. Calicore 17:35, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

text: If you say so. But do you really want the spelling mistakes too? -- Hoary 06:45, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title capitalization

message: Fashion house would be the norm for a specialized fashion company like BTSSB, see haute couture. Secondly, sweet lolita is the specific term for the certain type of clothing that BTSSB specializes in, see the definition at lolita fashion. ...added by Calicore
:If you say so. But do you really want the spelling mistakes too? -- Hoary 06:45, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion (3/11/06) 
Talk:Bobblehead

message: There is no information about who actually makes these, and whether there is a licensing arrangement and so on.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.20.104.229 (talk) 21:30, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Manufacturers? 
Talk:Peppermint extract

message: Is it right that the medical properties have not been proven? I have been prescribed peppermint oil capsules as treatment for IBS in the UK, the NHS are not well known for prescribing drugs which are not proven to work.
:They have been, according to the main peppermint article which has citations.Straw Cat (talk) 01:06, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think some rewording is needed since the antispasmodic effects are proven to be medically useful in a number of areas, even if it not a frontline treatment for anything. You do have to be very carful with any essential oil stuff though since even just a single incautiously worded sentence in a wikipedia article can spawn a thousand essential oil pseudoscience treatments. MasterTriangle12 (talk) 05:41, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Hi folks, does peppermint extract exist at all?
The etheric oil is very important (peppermint oil), therefore it is absolutely not sensible that "peppermint oil" redirects to "peppermint extract". 
Peppermint oil is an important article of commerce, but an extract of peppermint I have never heard of. 
This is not a good situation not to have an article on the oil, but one on the exract. 
People easily might mix up the two. Also I believe most of the things written here apply to the oil, not the extract.Elhacat (talk) 19:28, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Well you can have an aqueous extract, but I feel like that is more of a footnote since it is rather uncommon, there should be some clarification since they have quite different composition. MasterTriangle12 (talk) 05:37, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does it exist?
Talk:Yad Sara

message: * Merge to Yad Sarah. The Yad Sara article precedes the very new Yad Sarah, though the official and most common spelling is 'Yad Sarah'. The 'Yad Sara' article is larger, yet not ultimately wikified, the 'Yad Sarah' article is ready for the merge/expansion. --Shuki 23:06, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

message: The article's entire text (except opening sentence) is taken from http://www.yadsarah.org/index.asp?id=61 and is thus a possible copyright violation. Copied articles do not make ideal content anyway, so I will now make this page into a redirect to Yad Sarah. jnothman talk 08:33, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright violation
Talk:Yad Sarah

message: For merge discussion: Talk:Yad Sara
--Shuki 23:07, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Pardon me, I came here by way of the Bernie Madoff scandal. Is this group dedicated to helping Jewish families in Israel only, or all Israelis? Ought it to be noted one way or the other? Paul, in Saudi (talk) 07:33, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it helps all families in Israel. The article is on my list for a rewrite. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 09:02, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Jews only
Talk:Shining Tears

message: Hello!
Can anyone help to fill in the description of the 8 endings if you are free? Thanks in advance. --Kiwi8 23:14, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: See this diff. You can discuss about what details are and are not to be included all you want, but to totally remove a lot of characters looks a bit heavy-handed to me. Shinobu (talk) 23:35, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character deletion
Talk:Jaam-e-Jam (TV channel)

message: Article needs more info, clean up and categories. Mahanchian 23:19, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub 

message: I can't figure out how to remove the website from the infobox (it seems to be a default setting). The website has not been active for many years prior to the dissolve of the channel. I attempted to use an archived URL for the website however for many years the site was funning on Flash software so I was unable to find any usable archived URL. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 18:24, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox issue and defunct website
Talk:Living trust

message: * If it is decided that this merge should take place, Living Trust is the one to retain, as it is by far the more commonly used term.  However, there are numerous different specific types of trusts, each with its own peculiarities and regiments, that I vote to keep all of them separate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by User:Triplewiki (talk • contribs)  on 00:09, 3 November 2006
* I support the merger of living trust and inter vivos trust.  Both are essentially revocable trusts.  Moreover, "inter vivos" means living or more appropriately while living.  I would support the relabeling of the merger as revocable trusts (aka living or intervivos trusts). —Preceding unsigned comment added by User:Samoan (talk • contribs)  on 22:46, 7 November 2006
:Not quite sure what has happened here.  Originally the second comment above was a dissent from the merger (check page history), and was posted by ananymous IP address User:66.194.72.10.  On 08:06, 15 November 2006 the comment was edited by another anonymous IP address User:71.35.139.149 to change it to a support, and to change the unsigned tag signature to User:Samoan.  It may all be the same person using different computers, but it all looks a great deal more suspicious than it needs to, except for the fact that it is a discussion on a proposed merge between two little read and little cited articles on Wikipedia, and no one really cares.  Also curious, User:Samoan's first edit (check under contribs) pre-dates the merge tag, so you would have thought that if it really was his comment, he would have made the unsigned comment whilst logged on.  All of which leads me to conclude, that it was User:Samoan who was behind the grassy knoll when JFK was shot. 
:Legis 08:58, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I added the ZA info.  In doing so, I made *minor changes* to the first few paragraphs of the article, but Wikipedia's DIFF function seems to think that I had made major changes. :-) Oh, and I forgot to log in when I added the stuff. Once again, IANAL. -- leuce 18:33, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added the ZA stuff 

message: I reverted this change by 89.234.112.112 because the article referenced doesn't seem like a particularly good source - it takes a very POV position, promotes the sale of an eBook and doesn't appear to have undergone any sort of independent review.  The IP address adding the link has previously only edited to add the global-wills.com site to Wikipedia pages, so I'm also suspicious of spam.  But having said that it is a reference for a currently virtually unsourced article.  So I was hoping some other editors could review and provide their opinions.  -- Siobhan Hansa 15:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  global-wills.com reference 

message: There is nothing special about inter vivos trusts that they require a separate page. Surely this would be much better folded into the entry for Trust law? Lawdroid (talk) 17:32, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this separate from Trust?