lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Merwede

message: English is not my native language, so can please someone check this article and correct the wrong spelling and/or grammar? DaMatriX 16:22, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling and Grammar 

message: Is the Merwede a tributary/branch of the Rhine River or is it a tributary/branch of the Maas (Meuse)?  That needs to be made clear, as does its original course.  All of the confusing river names need to be referenced to connect to either the Rhine, Maas (Meuse), or Scheldt Rivers. --Criticalthinker (talk) 09:28, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to clarifie things....better late than never I gues :P DaMatriX (talk) 20:36, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Tributary
Talk:National Airlines Flight 2511

message: The libelous bit about Julian Frank is unsupported by any facts and out to be sourced or deleted.  Remember the highly-publicized bit about the guy who helped shoot JFK?  Sure, Frank may be dead, but it would be nice to source this.  I'll come back in a few days and remove that part.
:I did a bit of poking around in the Times historical archive.. news reports support the fact that the investigation centered around Frank. I added a reference and expanded the article a bit. Rhobite 18:08, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1st Guards Tank Army

message: From the ENGLISH language article:
Components of the Army while in Germany
    9-я танковая Бобруйско-Берлинская Краснознаменная ордена Суворова дивизия (Риза) вч пп 60990 позывной — Стрелка. (Выведена в Смоленск)
    11th Guards Tank Прикарпатско-Берлинская Краснознаменная ордена Суворова дивизия (Дрезден) вч пп 58325 позывной — Рапид. (Выведена в Белоруссию, в г. Слоним, передана 11 механизированной бригаде, кроме 44 ТП, во Vladimir, отдали только знамя.
    20-я гвардейская мотострелковая Прикарпатско-Берлинская Краснознаменная ордена Суворова дивизия (Гримма) вч пп 22220 позывной — Стрекач. (Выведена в г. Volgograd).
    Соединения и части Армейского подчинения.
Is there anybody else out there who doesn't understand this? Erjyx (talk) 09:54, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really?
Talk:Angela Shelton

message: Having come to this article after seeing a PROD on Searching for Angela Shelton, I concluded that, while the documentary is perhaps sufficiently notable to merit its own article, it is likely appropriate that the documentary history be provided here, inasmuch as Shelton was a singular force in the production of the documentary and inasmuch as the history of the documentary dovetails neatly and inextricably with the history of Shelton's professional career.  I thus re-merged the documentary information (concomitantly cleaning it up) and redirected Searching for Angela Shelton here.  If others feel that the documentary ought to be discussed separately, they should certainly be bold and return the body of the information to the article apropos of the documentary, leaving, of course, a Main article link directly infra to the sectional heading.  Joe 17:35, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have added the myspace link back to the page because I feel that it is important to the article, too important to not be included. I have been able to verify that the Myspace link DOES belong to Angela Shelton. It is mentioned on her weblog page, , which also mentions the wiki page I have created. kc12286 03:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Myspace link and [[WP:EL]]

message: Thanks for uploading or contributing to :Image:AngelaShelton.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 23:46, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for [[:Image:AngelaShelton.jpg]]

message: This article is written like an advertisement and consistently does not cite sources for its poetic, inappropriate claims. This really should be flagged, no? 108.183.33.114 (talk) 17:01, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relies extensively on biased promotional source
Talk:Proto-metal

message: As of right now this is just a definition so this needs to be expanded or deleted. Matterson52 17:37, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: The problem with this article is that it assumes metal didn't form until the late 70s or 80s.  It's a common belief nowadays but it's just wrong.  "Heavy metal" has been used as a genre term since the mid-70s or so, to the point where a rock encyclopedia published in 1977 by the NME describes Led Zeppelin as the definitve heavy metal band.  Certainly proto-metal exists as a term, but I've seen it refer to late 60s bands such as Blue Cheer and Vanilla Fudge, not bands like Black Sabbath and AC/DC.  There's a reason a movement was called the "New Wave of British Heavy Metal"; there was a prior wave to it.  WesleyDodds 10:54, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have that book, and it's a generally good overview of the genre.  The problem is a lot of times he places groups or albums under the wrong genre (such as Metallica's black album being listed as alternative metal).  And the first chapter or so is pretty flawed as it automatically assumes Black Sabbath is the first metal band, and subsequently tries to fit everything around their style, when for the longest time bands like Led Zeppelin defined metal more than they did. By the way, "heavy metal" in the early 70s was used primarily to refer to both Zeppelin and Sabbath (both bands rejected the term). WesleyDodds 01:02, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is pretty much my take on the subject too.  Back in the 1970's, "heavy metal" was mildly pejorative, and moreover represented a stylistic possibility of hard rock rather than a "lifestyle."  Hell, Dan Fogelberg's Face the Fire flirted with 1970s metal, and few people are prepared to argue that Dan Fogelburg "was metal."  I remember distinctly that people called me an "old metalhead" because I preferred Deep Purple and Iron Butterfly to disco back in my college dorm in the 1970s.  There was a Rolling Stone article I remember reading back in 1977 or so that considered Grand Funk Railroad to be the defining heavy metal act, and   Mitch Ryder and Detroit Wheels' reading of Lou Reed's Rock and Roll to be the greatest metal single ever recorded.  This stuff was all the metal there was until it was carried off by Vikings. - Smerdis of Tlön 19:39, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems 

message: The traditional metal article basically has the same info and predates this article. Pasajero 19:24, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The same with Classic metal, but someone flipped out when I suggesed merging them. Is there ANY difference between the three? They all say the same thing, have the same time period, all are pointed out to have influenced heavy metal, and list the same bands as being major contributors. Helltopay27 15:19, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Traditional metal

message: At Talk:Heavy_metal_music#Proto-metal a discussion is underway about how proto-metal is or is not a musical genre. Binksternet (talk) 02:05, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Its own genre?
Talk:USS Columbus (SSN-762)

message: Any current [or Ex] Shortbus sailors out there?
I'm working on filling in the 11 years of history that's missing ... or at least the 4.5 or so I was there [99-04].
BigFatDave 17:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Then you guys really ought to consider hooking up with the Military History Wikiproject. We could you experts like youselves to check our contributions :) TomStar81 (Talk) 03:59, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I did two westpacs on this boat.  
We did some amazing things, but this will forever make 762 look WORSE than even 772.  I am friends with alot of guys on 772, and they just had a bunch of bad luck.  I am sad to think that 762 is forever the worst boat, due to totally preventable problems.  This boat always had a "mob-rule" mentality. I remember a tall, blonde LT that loved to sleep (1996-1999) on watch and had a violent temper.  Good leadership! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 762LT (talk • contribs) 04:30, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Makes me sick 
Talk:Macintosh Quadra 650

message: I remember my ex-wife (then girlfriend) bought a 650 Quadra with a little inheritance she got, and intentions of becoming a freelance editor. I dissuaded her form getting the DOS card option (486 chip on the Nubus card, I think) Shortly after getting the Quadra, she felt her business was failing and I was wishing I learned DOS to be better employed and get a job with health insurance. She made the first suicide attempt in our relationship at the time, so I remember it well, the DOS Card Mac is tied with so many regrets, and I also I will refrain from signing this for- reasons.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.120.37.128 (talk) 17:31, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  No DOS card Quadra? 

message: Most 650s came with 8MB onboard. I thought it was all machines that had ethernet and a full 68040 had 8MB, but the maths for the 24MB option listed wouldn't make sense. I suspect someone may have already rationalised the number assuming 4MB onboard. I have a Centris 650 with 8MB onboard and seeing one with 4MB is the exception, not the norm. Options for need verifying and correcting in this article.
Phipli, 22 Feb, 2023 2A00:23C7:BF95:D801:A577:4DF8:F27D:4F70 (talk) 08:49, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears the Macworld source agrees with you; I've made a few changes. Thanks you very much for pointing this out. Best, DFlhb (talk) 20:21, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Onboard RAM
Talk:2006 World Snooker Championship

message: I've added these sections into this article - there is a little bit about sponsorship on the generic World Snooker Championship page but I think it fits well here and is particularly relevant to this year's event. I've just spent ages trawling the web to try and find the prize money and I don't think it's anywhere else on wikipedia so I've put it here. The only source I could find for this is  which I think is right but can't find anything on 888.com or worldsnooker.com to confirm. I think all this info is better here than in the generic article because it's a year-specific thing. I know both of these do detract slightly from this being purely a 'results' page but I figure they're better here than anywhere else. Hope you agree. Cheers. Iancaddy 17:52, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense to me - good work finding the prize money, those are really handy bits of info that tend not to be listed anywhere.  The generic page can be kept as an overall resume and situations/info specific to each year can be found in each page.  I don't know if it is worth expanding the waistcoat sponsorship thing or not.  The situation appears to be resolved as some of the players have other gambling sponsors on display - but we are not really privy to how it was resolved.  I presume world snooker caved in to the players, but that is just speculation (and so I would hazard about stating that in the article).  SFC9394 18:05, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  You could just add a "Prize money" section to each championship page, like the one on this page.  Some of the year pages have money listed and some don't, and some are incomplete (e.g. 1983 has the winner and total, but nothing else).  You could compare your figures with those already there and add/correct as necessary. SFC9394 12:54, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sponsorship and prize money

message: I know its only a minor detail but didn't it finish at midnight whatever BST not GMT as listed in the article heading? The clocks had gone forward at the end of the March so we are in Summer Time during the World Championships. Seedybob2 10:10, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Time of final finishing
Talk:Toxicity class

message: Just wanted to announce the creation of a new Toxicology Task Force under WikiProject Medicine. Feel free to come and sign up. Thanks -- Jrtayloriv (talk) 04:06, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Toxicology Task Force

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
* Support – very clear per book sources.  Dicklyon (talk) 05:51, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Late Bronze Age Troy

message: According to Nic Fields' [Osprey:Fortress] Troy c. 1700 - 1250 BC, pp. 24-25, Troy VIIb1 was NOT destroyed by fire or sword; and Troy VIII was occupied continuously, if modestly, from c.700 - 85 BC, with a temple to Athena at which Xerxes sacrificed a thousand oxen (c.480 BC), and Alexander the Great dedicated his whole suit of armor and took away sacred arms dating from the Trojan War (c.330 BC).66.235.26.150 (talk) 05:38, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Troy VIi (formerly Troy VIIa) says this site: http://www.salimbeti.com/micenei/history.htm  Böri (talk) 09:38, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Troia VIi 

message: The article seems to contradict itself. First:
"Troy VIIa appears to have been destroyed by a war"
Followed, at the end of the same paragraph, by:
"the finds are too scarce to clearly favour destruction by war over a natural disaster." Maitreya (talk) 13:58, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictions? 

message: Troy VIIa has now been reclassified as Troy VIi. Although Troy VIh was severely damaged by an Earthquake, it is clear that there is cultural continuity between it and the rebuilt/repaired city. Hence, the latter is now considered to be part of Troy VI rather than VII. It is still the level that is associated with the Trojan War. Bringing the article into conformity with this new consensus will require a substantial rewrite which I am not prepared to undertake at the present time, but may eventually do.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:4070:6240:1C5B:E934:455B:F062 (talk) 18:41, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Troy VIIa 

message: Currently this article contains two citations to Korfmann 2003 and Korfmann 2013 with no corresponding full citation.  I assume these are the same as in the article Troy, i.e.:
* 
* 
However, I don't have access to either of these sources to confirm – can anyone who does confirm this? Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 19:22, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: ? Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 20:23, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, those are the same from the main Troy article-- thanks for catching that! The first one is linked in the url field of the ref, but I can't help you with the second one. Botterweg14 (talk) 20:28, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for confirming.  I've updated the article to include the full citations. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 21:33, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short footnotes to Korfmann?
Talk:Darlene Hooley

message: The following articles may help in expanding this article, for the Sept. '07 WikiProject Oregon Collaboration of the Week. Feel free to incorporate them as you see fit. Hopefully all the links work without a NewsBank subscription, though some may not. -Pete 01:36, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can anyone find her maiden name? Sounds goofy to talk about her marrying a guy named Hooley without that info. Got it. --Esprqii 23:56, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  collaboration 

message: the page speaks of her belonging to the democratic party---that doesn't exist.   I would think the the party is "Democrat"Rvannatta 00:19, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Democratic is correct, follow the link to the Wiki article, or the Dem's own website from the URL on the Wiki article. Aboutmovies 00:23, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong party. 
Talk:Illinois Governor's Mansion

message: Aside from this article needing to be wikified (I just tagged it as such), the entire article (aside from the first five or six words) are directly copied and pasted from . However, as the site seems to make no attempt at earning money, it's not a "commercial content provider," and as such, the copyvio deletion tag does not apply. I don't know how to tag this page as needing to be altered into uncopied work, but if someone could do so, that'd be awesome. -- Kicking222 18:33, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You have a point.  Would you be satisfied with removal of the adjective "embattled"?  I think it's pretty obvious to most he was impeached, and if it's not people can go to his article to read more about him or his impeachment.  Took that out, then.  Seems reasonable to mention Pat Quinn decided he'd move in after Blago's impeachment, so left that.  Seem reasonable to all?  24.8.252.164 (talk) 07:55, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Canadian bodybuilders

message: Stopped by to see who might be listed here; yikes - lots of muscle babes-turned-cardgirls, but where's the beef?  Joe Weider is the only MALE Canadian bodybuilder listed?  No Greg K?  No Bruce-y?  Reminds me of how so many amateur-level shows are now focussed on the women; and guys have lost interest because of the boredom factor associated with figure/fitness (unless their girlfriend happens to be in the show, in which case they'll at least feign interest).  OK, OK, I've got tons of pictures of BC/AB athletes, and not a few from other provinces, that I might have donated to Wikipedia; but I'm not going to write the bios or contest lists.  Shouldn't there at least be a page listing Mr Canadas, Mr Western Canadas, provincial champs in succession etc?  Skookum1 18:34, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Since when did bodybuilding become a women-only sport?

message: I guess one of Mark's friends put him here; but if he's on a bodybuilding page, and not on a pornstar page, shouldn't it be his real name, or not at all?Skookum1 18:41, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mark Wolff
Talk:Greatest Hits 1974–78

message: Isn't Classic Rock just what radio stations use to describe most music that from the 80s and before?  Shouldn't the genre in the written box be said as "Rock" at least, instead of Classic rock? 216.129.208.87 11:33, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 

message: Just a passerby, not familiar with these things:
As a reader, the top of the track listing includes a sentence ending with "except where noted.."  Note the two ending periods.
When I went to do a quick edit, the "tracklist" macro (or whatever term Wikipedia uses) shows the sentence ending with a single period.
The extra one comes from somewhere, but I'm hardly qualified to debug it. Maybe it's a problem with the macro in general. Just wanted to point it out. 2600:6C67:9540:765:98AC:F976:7A9D:D2C8 (talk) 12:14, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very minor track-listing "macro" bug 

message: Something I'm not qualified to fix: Reference #12, from the Certifications table, points to a broken link for this album's entry on the RIAA's website. 2600:6C67:9540:765:98AC:F976:7A9D:D2C8 (talk) 12:37, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken US RIAA reference link
Talk:Grand Austrian State Prize

message: added categories Austrian art and Art awards --Andrew 18:36, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: categories

message: I propose that Austrian State Prize be merged into Grand Austrian State Prize. because the two articles talk about the same thing; The Grand Austrian State Prize article though is more detailed, and I also think the word "Grand" State Prize makes the translation of "Großer" Staatspreis more accurate (both translations are commonly used). Rosys00828 (talk) 23:09, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Meryl Cassie

message: I have deleted the MulattoAmerica references, since the link was not working and there seems to be no evidence that Meryl ever had any relation to the program whatsoever. If anybody knows more about this or why it was added, please tell us. Alyandra 18:38, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Which program are you asking about? -Media clutz (talk) 10:15, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anybody know how Meryl Cassie went in Australian Idol? Apparently she went for it today -130.220.153.136 (talk) 10:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Australian Idol

message: Kudos to whoever wanted to update Meryl's information, but please, don't do it so poorly. There's so much inaccurate and/or vague information, not to mention the style of writing is horrific and sometimes downright offensive. The only notable thing she did in 2004 - 2007 was to audition for NZ Idol? Please.
Then there's fragments copied off my old website (merylcassie.net). If you need to copy, at least do it correctly, Jesus. And don't delete accurate information and replace it with incorrect crap. Thanks.
--83.76.102.139 (talk) 14:18, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisions 

message: This WP:BLP doesn't cite one reliable source. The blogs and other self-published sources used as references are not acceptable. Verifiability is a cornerstone policy for biographies. If reliable sources aren't found quickly, the article will be submitted to WP:AfD. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:05, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problematic article
Talk:Lake Murray Country

message: I'm from this area, and I personally think this should be merged with the midlands area as it encompasses the Lake Murray Area (Country? I've never heard such a term for the area).
I agree in some respects... the term "Lake Murray Country" was coined by the tourism association in Richland County.  The outfit is known for their mismanagement of Lake tourism and publicity, and as far as I am concerned, this is a made up place. However, I didn't create the page, and to a number of people in the Columbia area, this is a term commonly used so I left this page existing, but I started the page on the lake itself. - grey ghost 22:30, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this really a region?
Talk:Daniel Island

message: Should this advertisement about renting a property be here? --206.74.172.254 19:45, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Graniteville, South Carolina

message: Actually, you can find the current statistics Graniteville, and Graniteville now has a population over 7000 in the 29829 zip code. Here they are:
I just updated the Demographics.  Could someone PLEASE help me clean this up, and put in citations.  I've been away from Wikipedia for a while Licewithrice (talk) 02:20, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

message: https://www.facebook.com/groups/GranitevilleDucks1/
Wingman1 18:04, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graniteville Ducks