lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:X-ray diffraction

message: X-ray diffraction is very different from X-ray crystallography, it should never have been merged. I am reviving it (as stated on the crystallography page for discussion some time ago), moving selected material from X-ray crystallography, where contributors can be found. More work is needed, this is just the first pass. Ldm1954 (talk) 07:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviving XRD Page
Talk:Princess Anne High School

message: Hello all, and thank you for contributing to this school site. I'm part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment team, and, as it has recently been editted, then I'm reviewing this page. I'm currently giving it a grade of start on the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale and an importance of Mid on this importance scale.
My reasoning is as follows: This article is extensive, and has references - a bit more and a B would be right. Mid is based on the Newsweek reference. Hope this helps Victuallers 19:16, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  March 2007
Talk:Capsule

message: ummm, there is a band listed on wikipedia under capsule (group) but it isnt on this page
this makes it really hard to find
can someone add it here?
Let's speak English in the edit summaries. That means you, KPBotany.
128.171.106.229 (talk) 21:37, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

message: https://ai.stackexchange.com/questions/1294/how-does-hintons-capsules-theory-work/1313  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4107:2800:31D1:E502:5A2E:E79F (talk) 08:43, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  add also: [[capsule (neural networks)]] = [[capsule (deep learning)]]
Talk:This Man Must Die

message: The redirect Killer! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  signed, Rosguill talk 17:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Killer!]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Operational Zone of the Adriatic Littoral

message: The article states that Odilo Globocnik was responsible for setting up the Chelmno extermaination camp. This is incorrect, though he was responsible (as stated) for Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka and Majdanek. Chelmno was a local initiative of the Wartheland occupation administration under Gaulieter/Reichsstathalter Arthur Greiser, HSSPF Wilhelm Koppe and Sipo chief Ernst Damzog, and was intended only to murder the Jews (and Roma) of that territory, particularly the population of the ghetto of Lodz. Chelmno had nothing to do with Aktion Reinhard and its origins in the "Euthenasia" (T4) operation are very different, starting with the murder of disabled hospital inmates from across West Prussia in gas vans under the command of Herbert Lange who then become Chelmno commandant. FiftusTheSixth (talk) 09:25, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globocnik did not supervise Chelmno
Talk:Line of Contact

message: I cut three sentences that were extremely POV, and apparently original research, too.  I see this page had been tagged in the past, but no discussion happened here.  I couldn't see any way to salvage this chunk.  "What this meant" goes far beyond an unsourced description of some Germans' alleged reactions to different varieties of Soviet troops.  If we want to cover such issues, I think we'll need sources, and encyclopedic writing.  Thanks.  Ale And Quail (talk) 00:55, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed unsourced, POV material 

message: I have tagged the sentence "Austria managed to stay free of Soviet domination, whereas Czechoslovakia did not." as possibly non-neutral. I am not sure how to resolve the problem, but I don't think that "managed to stay free of Soviet domination" is neutral wording. Please can someone correct this if possible? Thanks, DesertPipeline (talk) 22:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Czechoslovakia had a popular vote to determine its communist future. Soviet domination is not only non-neutral its also wrong. F.Alexsandr (talk) 14:50, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible NPOV issue
Talk:Ternan

message: There is nothing in this article that indicates any link at all to Taranis, and nothing in the article on Taranis.  This looks like someone's idea, but not supported at all.  I suggest the section be supported or removed.  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 02:52, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "see also:  Taranis"?
Talk:Storage organ

message: How do storage organs reproduce themselves?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.118.42.255 (talk) 22:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

message: It has been suggested that this article be merged with perennating organ. However, the person who added the merge tags never gave his or her reasons. Also, after reading the articles and doing some quick searching on Google, I do not know if that is a good idea to merge the articles. Here is text from each article:
"A storage organ is a part of a plant specifically modified for storage of energy (generally in the form of carbohydrates) or water."
"Perennating organs are usually modified vegetative parts of plant body such as stem, root, leaves or whole shoots. These plants usually die down in autumn but grow again the following spring. The organs remain dormant in the soil after the rest of the plant has died. Plants possessing perennating organs can survive from year to year. Hence the word "perennating", meaning "through the year"."
It seems like storage organs are used to defend against herbivores and adverse conditions, while plants with perennating organs use them to survive more than one year. So, they are similar, but apparently not identical, in function. -- Kjkolb 19:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is an overlap between the functions of a storage organ and a perennating organ, but they are in principle different. See Raunkiær plant life-form for a classification of perennating organs.  Resting buds are a perennating organ, but not a storage organ. The stem (body) of a cactus is generally regarded as having been modified to act as a water storage organ, but it's not a perennating organ, in that it's not what the cactus dies back to in an adverse period. There could usefully be some cross-referencing, which I will attempt. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:55, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

text: After studying both articles, I decided to merge them after all. "Perennating organ" now re-directs here. I have expanded this article; not sure if it needs more or not. Peter coxhead (talk) 15:06, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Perennation has now been created, and I've made that article the redirect target of "Perennating organ". Plantdrew (talk) 17:51, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Plant storage organs 2800:3C0:2030:48:A4AF:1E4F:C64B:F3E5 (talk) 22:57, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Integrated science
Talk:German occupation of Byelorussia during World War II

message: The article is written with explicit intentions and largely groundlessly to discredit political opposition (Belarusian Central Rada) to the pro-Putin administration of Belarus. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 03:23, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: And your specific examples are?  And your citations to the effect are? HammerFilmFan (talk) 19:14, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: who and why decided to trim it? this current article is dry retelling of facts that doesnt provide the insight on what actually happened.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saveol2009 (talk • contribs) 14:17, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bring back the previous revision 

message: What was the sense to change the name of Belarus in the title to Byelorussia? What does it mean Byelorussia (present-day Belarus)? Was it Byelorussia in 1941 or 1944??? - Frantishak (talk) 22:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , See what? That's that and this is is this. See also my analysis of how the name was changed here: Talk:The_Holocaust_in_Byelorussia. This seems like a unilateral decision by a single editor; this should be moved back to 'Belarus', with no prejudice from a RM from that name - which is common and was stable for years. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:50, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Byelorussia? 
Talk:Hurricane Guillermo (1997)

message: All in all, it looks decent at a quick glance. I recommend you add some more lede so there isn't so much white space. There are still some awkward wording issues, namely the first paragraph. Be sure to rewrite it; currently it is a copyvio. The record section needs sourcing to prove it is currently 4th. Also, how do you know the two deaths in Cabo San Lucas were indirect? Hurricanehink (talk) 22:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I solved the impact copy-vios by making a few changes. Probably i can change the deaths to 3 directly. I can get rid of the (now 4th). That's all I could think of for the lede area.Mitchazenia 22:09, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial comments

message: I don't know too much about tropical cyclones, but I'm still curious: how could the origins for a Pacific storm form off the coast of Africa?  Do such waves go completely across the Americas?  Nyttend 19:01, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The relevant article is at tropical wave. Many waves cross the entire Atlantic and Central America before developing in the Pacific Ocean. For example in 1993 there were a total of 70 tropical waves. Thirteen of the named 15 storms to form in the east Pacific that year originated as waves (this is more than developed into Atlantic storms), all of these originated in Africa. See the figure at the bottom of page 5 of this report.--Nilfanion (talk) 21:21, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dakar? 
Talk:MyGreenElectronics

message: as someone who works in the industry I can say that this is most certainly not an advertisement.  MGE is a public service that does not promote any company, only the act of recycling.
*I am pretty dubious of article about this sort of organization, but this particular one is highly notable. I believe an earlier article about it was deleted. this one seems OK.DGG 21:28, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

message: The site appears to be defunct, as the domain is for sale. Dpbjinc (talk) 19:26, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, there appears to be a new site:  Dpbjinc (talk) 19:32, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Site defunct 
Talk:Labin Republic

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Nick-D (talk) 08:34, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Static build

message: Take out the dll Hell stuff, this should be objective.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.39.147.211 (talk • contribs) 19:33, 7 March 2007
: Described the "dll hell" rather than naming it. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 16:12, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article seems to contain material copied from Linker (computing).
====links for GFDL compliance====
*link to the version of the Wikipedia article on "linker" as it existed in the summer of 2005, when static build was written.
*link to the history of "linker"
69.140.152.55 (talk) 01:07, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: copyright credit

message: *link to the version of the Wikipedia article on "linker" as it existed in the summer of 2005, when static build was written.
*link to the history of "linker"
69.140.152.55 (talk) 01:07, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: links for [[WP:GFDL|GFDL]] compliance
Talk:Area code 727

message: A map should be given, such as Area code 951 has. OverMyHead 19:35, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Jabal Druze State

message: the name of the article to "Jabal al-Druze (state)" anyone agree? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 23:26, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Yazan (talk) 14:48, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Gryffindor (talk) 19:02, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  I would like to change
Talk:Radcliffe Choral Society

message: Arms should be obtained, with blazon.  --Daniel C. Boyer 19:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bhojpur, Madhya Pradesh

message: Bhojpur in Madhya Pradesh is important for both religions, Hindu or Jain. Article should not be exclusively part of Jainism project.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Piyushj23 (talk • contribs) 03:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jain Stub

message: Piyushj23 (talk) 16:28, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The text is apparently taken from a travel website. Some of it is quite inaccurate. The Paramara rule did not end with Bhoja. It lasted until the end of 13th century. There is an inscription of Samvat 1157 in the Jain temple that mentions Narvarmadeva, a descendant of Bhoja.Malaiya (talk) 03:54, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: The Description is very poetic

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:54, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Eliran Elkayam

message: How is Eliran Elkayam any different than the numerous MLS players that have their own articles on Wikipedia? He has played all over the Israeli leagues and is far more notable than some of the American soccer players on wiki. NYC2TLV 19:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm removing the speedy delete tag. Having played in the Israeli Premier League he seems to meet the criteria at WP:BIO. PC78 21:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contesting the speedy deletion
Talk:Chip timing

message: This image shows a J-Chip 8 Channel Receiver not an ChampionChip Receiver.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sergedomk (talk • contribs) 00:32, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: When I created this article back in 2007, I never thought it would become a spam garden.  Please stop adding commercials for your particular product. We will arrange links in alphabetical order.  Please be considerate. Racepacket (talk) 04:31, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Spam
Talk:Tudor's Biscuit World

message: As of today (15 Sept 2009), the Tudor's website only lists locations in WV, KY, and OH.  No mention is given on SC or VA locations.  See http://www.tudorsbiscuitworld.com/locations.cfm for more info.  Matt 94.189.141.125 (talk) 01:59, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. That link only shows WV, KY, & OH locations. No mention of SC or VA. I'll make the changes.  youngamerican (wtf?) 11:08, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locations 

message: The location tagged as the original location is addressed to 617 Lee Street E, Charelston WV, while the pictured location is the 1506 Washington Street Location. Attatched the google street view of the two below. 
Washington Street:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Tudor's+Biscuit+World/@38.3433962,-81.6224885,3a,75y,73.18h,91.05t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sX_V9sP-xrME7U_4lXTjqLA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192!4m14!1m7!3m6!1s0x884f2cb77bb92c2d:0xfe883ffd59dabae2!2sTudor's+Biscuit+World!8m2!3d38.3435284!4d-81.6221903!16s%2Fg%2F1td4_k8p!3m5!1s0x884f2cb77bb92c2d:0xfe883ffd59dabae2!8m2!3d38.3435284!4d-81.6221903!16s%2Fg%2F1td4_k8p?entry=ttu
Lee Street East:
https://www.google.com/maps/@38.361193,-81.643154,3a,75y,238.66h,81.58t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sLlFuQ7bI3KLZ4gnQCGRzNw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu PygmySnake (talk) 21:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect information in article.
Talk:Gino's Pizza and Spaghetti

message: Gino's location of Walnut Hills in Huntington WV.  was the cause of over 48 employee and customer food sickness cases in early 2023. Instead of being shut down, the owner continued serving customers until on January 21, 2023, knowing how unsanitary the store was he never even considered closing for cleaning. A young lady by the name of Kimberly Shipton found a decapitated mouse in her ham and cheese salad along with 6 live cockroaches in his home style pasta. To this day the doors remain open because the owner has enough money to pay off inspectors. Next time you order from that specific location, it is recommended you look over your food carefully, or better yet, just don't risk it. Should be illegal to keep a place open that could get customers sick. 24.112.170.57 (talk) 18:35, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cockroaches and mice 

message: There are currently a registered sex offender and 60 yr old homosexual manager working at the Walnut Hills location currently that have both been accused as of 2-3-2023 of attempting to groom little boy who's mother was a regular at this store. If you do have young children, please be warned to keep a sharp eye for funny business 24.112.170.57 (talk) 18:43, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Child molesters and man babys
Talk:Peggy Pascoe

message: If this is an article about Peggy Pascoe, it should say something about her.  If this article is about is a theory that happens to be espoused by Pascoe, it should be under a more appropriate title - provided it isn't original research. --Alynna 19:56, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this page about? 
Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-03-04 Possible bad faith in use of citations involved in the move of Juozas Lukoševičius to Józef Łukaszewicz

message: First of all, there was not bad faith involved in the move and - contrary to what Novickas suggests - it was not Piotrus to move the article, but yours truly . The move was done in good faith and in accordance with WP:NAME. Apparently some WP:NCON problems arose, but these are handled on the talk page and I don't see a need to mediate. In particular I asked for any source that would back up the claim that Łukaszewicz (who himself stated he's a Pole) is also considered Lithuanian by Lithuanians (not considered himself a Lithuanian, mind you, which could be quite hard to source). However, the plea for sources has not been satisfied as of now. 
However, the issue is not of naming but of mentioning the Lithuanized form of his name (which is mentioned even without the sources requested, solely not to raise too much bad blood in the Lithuanian wikicommunity that seems to be a tad touchy when it comes to Polish-Lithuanian relations and people born in Vilna in the times when the town was not yet a part of Lithuania) and the arguments against the move were not raised so far. When counting simple google clicks Łukaszewicz beats Lukosevicius 23:1 (1310:57), with a large number of links in both searches being irrelevant (i.e. other people named the same way or simple errors). Note that the search excludes all wikipedia sites and its mirrors, so that part of Novickas' reasoning is also false. Same goes for Google books where Łukaszewicz beats Lukosevicius 10:1 (-). We have Łukaszewicz's own memoirs in which he explicitly states he was a Pole and uses his Polish and Russian names interchangeably (Lithuanized form is not mentioned even once). We have lots and lots of publications calling him a Pole and so far not a single one calling him a Lithuanian (even though we asked for such). 
Having said that, I believe this matter is pretty much a lost case for Novickas. I believe he/she realized that and decided to take the matter to some external mediation instead of providing sources and taking part in a normal naming dispute. Wrong way to go if you asked me. Not that I had anything against such wikilawyering... Anyway, I find it strange that Novickas decided to spread his/hers accusations of bad faith here and there without even questioning the move at the respective talk page. //Halibutt 19:57, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Maghrawa

message: The newer article Maghrawid Dynasty covers a lot of the ground already included in thus article - I don’t think we need two separate articles. Mccapra (talk) 23:05, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: They do look like two tiny articles with greatly overlapping scope. At least part of the Maghrawid Dynasty article appears to have been directly copied from this one. CMD (talk) 09:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

text: Agreed, this is pretty close to an unnecessary content fork for a topic that can be covered on one page at the moment. R Prazeres (talk) 00:04, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: Looks to me like a Google Books fail, and possibly a confusion between publisher and printer. This is a reprint of a historic book originally published by , a venerable and highly respectable publisher. The age of the source may create POV concerns about colonialism, but it is being used here for ancient history, and there is no reason to suppose that the reprint was altered. The French take old books and history *extremely* seriously, and I am fairly certain it would not have made its way onto Google Books if it was a hoax somehow. Elinruby (talk) 05:14, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  reliable source concern 

message: will take some time to untangle Elinruby (talk) 05:22, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  really garbled translation 

message: I've removed the "Maghrawid Dynasty" infobox, as the article is about the entire Maghrawa confederation, not just the one dynasty in Fez. As the EI2 article on the Maghrawa and other sources make clear, there were many Maghrawa groups and rulers across the Maghreb with shifting relations and allegiances across this period. The article rightly mentions more than one of them and there are still more to cover; it's not as simple as a single "dynasty". Compare also with Banu Ifran and other similar articles about tribes/confederations of the time.
There are also complications that the infobox glosses over. For one, the end date of the dynasty proposed there is the date of the capture of Fez, but the exact date of this event is uncertain (as I've clarified again in this edit). The infobox also repeats a passing claim in the article that Ziri made Oujda his "capital", but other sources (including the EI2 article, which is very detailed) explicitly state that Fez was his capital and this is implied by the article itself via the aforementioned end date.  I've also removed a dubious WP:OR map in a previous edit (). In short, there is little accurate and representative information that can be conveyed in an infobox here, even if the article were revised more carefully. R Prazeres (talk) 20:22, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:Qu'aiti

message: How is the name Kuwait similar to this? It says "This article is about an autonomous former state in southern Arabia. For the modern nation with a similar name, see Kuwait." Do English–speakers actually find it similar? Wait.. is this about the pronunciation or the letters? ––SharabSalam (talk) 13:25, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither the pronunciation nor the letters are similar, we might as well just remove it Abo Yemen✉ 06:17, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar name?