Talk:Stefan Marinov

message: Did someone find the published advertisement in Nature? In my search I cannot find it as published, and I have the impression that Marinov's intended publication in Nature has been rejected. Is it so? Can someone provide a copy from Nature with the exact advertisement? Danko Georgiev MD 11:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Heartily second that remark on the standards of New Scientist.137.205.183.109 (talk) 13:02, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Looking for ads

message: Hello I am trying to help to clear up the mess in the article. The biography can be recovered by Bulgarian sources, which are reliable, and so I have just filled the correct birth date, etc. Also I have seen some bias as if Marinov is without whatsoever contributions to physics, yet I have full access to reasonable papers publsihed by the "early Marinov" that appeared in reputable journals. Possibly my guess is there is "late Marinov" where all these works on free energy appeared, but they have not been published in peer-reviewed journals. So I would like to suggest to divide the article into two halfes - early vs. late Marinov. As it happens in science many other scientists have such periods of good contributions to science, and late in life due to some disease to claim exactly the opposite of their early science, or push to the extreme their theories etx. One such example is Rudolf Virchow who has brilliant contributions to medicine, yet never believed in Darwinian evolution of humans from monkeys, and did a lot of things to stop/oppose/rebut the evolutionists. Danko Georgiev MD 11:04, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trying to help 

message: The reference from Dr.Bass given (http://www.padrak.com/ine/NEN_5_5_2.html) is conflicting with what Marinov
himself always claimed (see The Thorny Way of Truth vol.V and also several Italian articles on local magazines
like Frigidaire n.108: http://digilander.libero.it/altraenergia/testa1.html): Marinov after all always acted honestly and
politely before a so much controversal fact; he did test the little Testatika machines by Baumann, he was photographed
with them and he also reported that Baumann tried to explain him the principle of his machines, but always using a
little understandable and unscientific language - thus Marinov ALWAYS ADMITTED he never understood the principle !  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.5.123.46 (talk) 17:21, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marinov DIDN'T KNOW the secret of the Testatika ! 

message: I removed Categories “Pseudoscientists” and “Pseudoscience” as inappropriate. The former because no such category exists. The latter because (a) it is a Contentious label; (b) it is, in the opinion of me and many if not most people, a very stigmatizing label, and so should be used sparingly; (c) articles on real people are normally placed directly in said category. Okay?--Solomonfromfinland (talk) 19:22, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned out 

message: I am wondering who put this non-sense label? It is clearly written in the article that Marinov has died on 15 July 1997 (aged 66). Danko Georgiev (talk) 12:03, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography of a living person