lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Southern Sundevils

message: I've added an infobox, but in order to complete it it needs information on titles and playoff appearances in-line with other BAFL Premier division articles. Hence,an expert on the subject is needed.
:Not to worry, I may not be an expert but I know where to find this info. I'll get onto it as soon as I've finished working on Reading Renegades. Bettia (talk) 13:17, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete Infobox 
Talk:Soil zoology

message: Should this page be merged into soil ecology? This article seems to include large animals. Keeping them separate would cause confusion when these two articles grow in size. Large animals being distinct would not generate a large enough article for it to split from soil ecology, if after it merged. Sidelight12 Talk 16:28, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think that would be a very good idea. Soil mesofauna might also be a candidate for merging.--Animalparty-- (talk) 08:24, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge/redirect
Talk:Elden Kingston

message: All of the sources referenced on the page and any others I can locate almost invariably use "Elden Kingston" in referring to this person. "Charles" is only used on first usage when presenting the full given name. Article name should reflect the name person is most commonly known by, which is "Eldon Kingston". Snocrates 21:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the page per your request, since no one has contested your proposal. Dekimasuよ! 02:48, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:European Integration Studio

message: The two citations would look better to the reader if they were simple footnotes with standard internet citations (see . Would anyone mind if I converted them? ---- CharlesGillingham (talk) 05:22, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: See this demonstration ---- CharlesGillingham (talk) 05:28, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd citations 
Talk:Tom Tancredo 2008 presidential campaign

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  See above  b (MoS):  See above notes.
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):   
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#:a (tagged and captioned):  b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
#Overall: 
#:a Pass/Fail: 
Good work on the article. A few more pictures wouldn't hurt, and that References 29 and 30 need fixing, but these are minor issues.Mitch32contribs 23:57, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article review
Talk:Charlotte, Vermont

message: In looking at this page and other pages related to Charlotte, I offer the following discussion:
:* Something should be added to "Media" about the Charlotte News. We had a COI editor insert some text, but while that text was reverted, it brings up a good point. The Charlotte News is a nonprofit, community-based newspaper that has been continuously publishing in Charlotte since 1958. To me that satisfies WP:N and should be mentioned.
:* There is an article out there for Charlotte Meeting House that could perhaps be mentioned on this page in some way. I'm just not entirely sure how it might fit into existing sections.
:* The demographic data in "Demographics" is now over 20 years old as it dates from the 2000 Census. That section should be updated, but right now it makes sense to wait until whenever the 2020 Census results are published.
If I get some time to add these kind of updates, I will, but if any other editors want to do so, please do! - Dyork (talk) 22:31, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested updates to the Charlotte, Vermont page 

message: I added a mention of The Charlotte News to the Media section, because I do believe it should be mentioned there.  However, I could only find primary sources. A challenge with searching is that there was also another paper, The Charlotte News in Charlotte, North Carolina, which has many references. Ideally it would be good to find mentions about The Charlotte News in, for instance, other Vermont media sites, or sites writing about Vermont media. - Dyork (talk) 02:04, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added section about The Charlotte News - but could use some good other sources 

message: I just added a note on the unusual pronunciation of Charlotte, VT (CharLOTTE rather than CHARlotte).  I think it's significant enough: of the many other places named after Queen Charlotte, this appears to be the only one pronounced this way.
Mark Asread (talk) 16:24, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: The Demographics section has data from the 2000 census. The info box and other areas have been updated to the 2020 census numbers, but this longer narrative text under Demographics is still all 2000 data. At some point it should be updated with the 2020 numbers. (I don't have time to do it today... but at some point I may if no one else does it before me.) - Dyork (talk) 18:15, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics section needs updating to 2020 census
Talk:Kesen dialect

message: There's a contradiction here - who counted this number of speakers? Do those "74,000" speakers know that they speak "Kesen language" or is it just a statement by Yamaura Harutsugu that nobody else verified? --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 11:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Amir, a contradiction is when someone says A and ~A. You are only claiming that someone said A, but A is unverifiable. That's not a contradiction, it's WP:V. Sai Emrys ¿? ✍ 21:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of speakers 

message: Harutsugu Yamaura wrote and introduced the tongue spoken by inhabitants of Kesen District as Kesen Language in this linguistics journal with authority.
I think that this article should be written as a language..--Damena (talk) 03:31, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read the above discussion.  As it is, the article still essentially treats it as a language despite the move. CES (talk) 16:03, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  dialect or language? 

message: According to WP:ELDEAD, "Links to dead URLs in a list of external links are of no use to Wikipedia articles. Such dead links should either be updated or removed."
There is an archived version of Yamaura's E-Pix page here in the Internet Archive. However, that page was mainly for selling Yamaura's self-published books. I'm removing the link. I'm noting the archive, though, in case someone wants to add it. Cnilep (talk) 02:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead external links
Talk:New Zealand at the Olympics

message: Very good, but need to mention Harry Kerr in 1908!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hugo999 (talk • contribs) 21:45, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: And 1908

message: I've just added an external link to the NZHistory.net.nz feature on the Olympics. I hope this is acceptable.Jamie Mackay (talk) 10:14, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely! It's relevant and up-to-date. DerbyCountyinNZ (talk) 11:23, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: External link

message: I think the statement "mostly in Athletics" is very misleading. The great majority of medals are in water-related sports - kayak, rowing, and sailing. 85.0.89.95 (talk) 20:15, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Medals mostly in Athletics?

message: Since there is something in there about the 1976 boycott by african nations, perhaps something should also be added about NZ's boycott of the 1980 olympics, with a link to the main article about the boycott? Tombleyboo (talk) 12:38, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Mention 1980?
File talk:European Union member states with applications.png

message: The map designates four countries (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Serbia) as "potential candidate countries" while many other European countries (e.g. Andorra, Iceland, Moldova, San Marino, Ukraine) are not so designated. What is the source for that distinction? --Mathew5000 (talk) 22:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly what I came to the page to ask.  This smacks of OR/crystal balling.  Kevin McE (talk) 08:17, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And having asked, I went and found an answer: Potential candidate is an formal EU designation .  My apologies for the above accusation.  Kevin McE (talk) 08:26, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the link. Good to know that the diagram is not just OR. But I still am not entirely clear on how exactly the EU is using that designation. Why, for instance, is Iceland not considered a "potential candidate country"? Is the designation used exclusively for Balkan countries? --02:59, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps it didn't consider joining. Notice Morrocco tried to join, even  though it's in Africa. Maybe it has to be part of mainland Europe, or at least close enough to it, like Ireland or Malta.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.16.23.49 (talk) 16:25, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Iceland, Norway and Switzerland DONT WANT TO JION. Turkey would like to jion very much because 5% of it's landmass is europe (apparently thats enough) but many people have rejected them and called them too 'Asian'. The balkans are candidates because many (Montenegro and Kosovo) already have the euro, most (Albania, Macedonia, Croatia, Montenegro) WANT to jion and because the others (Serbia and Bosnia & Herz.) are just bound to jion once surrounded. The reasons why far-eastern european countries have no interest or are rejected is because Moldova is too poor, Ukraine too big, Belarus too authoristic (or slightly backwards compared to europe.. they are the only country in europe with the death penalty) and russia is simply too Scary. Malta jioned because they are a very european country and were never controlled by an Asian or african power and were always ruled by european powers. Cyprus jioned because it speaks Greek (Greece is in the EU) and because culturly it is European. Have I made sense? Iceland hasn't jioned because just like switzerland and norway it doesn't want to jion. While Andorra, San Marino and other microstates arn't included is because they also don't want to jion because they can simply have all the benefits of EU nations without jioning, E.G they all have the Euro and they are all part of the Shengen Agreement. If anyone has any questions ask on my talk page. Bezuidenhout (talk) 22:07, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "potential candidate countries" -- according to whom?
Talk:San Francisco (You've Got Me)

message: Leather, Baby...  Mister ricochet (talk) 22:06, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Please explain how you obtained permission to reprint the lyrics here. DurovaCharge! 10:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There's been no response so I've removed the lyrics per WP:COPYRIGHT.  Material on Wikipedia is copyleft licensed.  So it would be appropriate to quote some of the lyrics but not all of them. DurovaCharge! 22:05, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, someone has attempted to insert the copyrighted lyrics of this song.  Please explain your rationale.  Even if the claim of permission were verified through OTRS (which it isn't), it would be unlikely to be compliant with Wikipedia's policy. DurovaCharge! 21:45, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Permission
Talk:Neil D. Mathur

message: I don't think this person is of note. Can someone flag for notability? 128.232.231.146 (talk) 23:35, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought the same so proposed the article for deletion in June. The WP:PROD was challenged on the basis of his publication record meeting the criteria at WP:PROF, especially the high numbers of citations to his work. Fences&Windows 04:49, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ivory "TAE" Mobley

message: Just a quick note as to why I removed the speedy/bio tag.  That tag is for articles that do not assert notability, while the article was two sentences that only asserted notability with no other info.  It needs work, but notability was asserted.  The band has multiple albums and mentions him on the front page of their own website (not 3rd party but obviously it is notable from this).  The other fact needs citation, but will leave alone for a bit and allow someone to source it.  Pharmboy (talk) 22:18, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy Tag Removed
Talk:Janet Abu-Lughod

message: Is Janet Abu-Lughod (nee Lippman) of Jewish origin? Would it be relevant to include this in the first sentence? (e.g. Janet ... is a Jewish-American sociologist)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.189.162 (talk) 01:17, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aca Lukas

message: I'm not sure that his music is folk music. Yes, he records his songs for Grand Production, but i don't think he sings folk. It sound more like rock. Be objective, for God's sake.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.246.36.222 (talk) 09:33, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: aj ne seri, zanr u pitanju je turbo folk 93.86.15.243 (talk) 20:13, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Folk? 

message: I'm not going to look for refs now, maybe in a day or two, but I'd encourage other editors to find sources for this article in the meantime. BytEfLUSh | Talk! 06:55, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  No references on this BLP 

message: I already posted this at Wikiproject Serbia:
While I understand that Aca Lukas is popular in Serbia and almost certainly notable for a Wikipedia article, I'm having a hard time finding reliable sources (the BLP currently has none). I thought of placing WP:PROD, but I think sources could be found (and I know I'm often really bad at finding them), and I would get called out for doing it in bad faith. So, if someone could take a look at the article and perhaps add a ref or a dozen, that'd be great. =)
This subject cannot be WP:BLPPROD-ed because it has an external link. I will WP:PROD it in a few days if there are still no sources, and the article isn't improved. Please don't take this the wrong way - I tried finding reliable sources, but all I got was tabloid trash in Serbian language. byteflush Talk 01:27, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for this BLP 

message: Recently, I have stumbled over a few news stories about Aca Lukas plagiarising BTS' song 'Mic Drop (Steve Aoki Remix)' - I have found some sources, but they are all in Serbian (I don't speak Serbian) and could be biased. I am a part of BTS' fanbase (ARMY) but I do not want to be biased about the problem. If a Serbian-speaker could help with the sources, it would be appreciated. [I choose not to include Lukas' Instagram post denying the matter, however.]
82.2.181.227 (talk) 14:57, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy over "Mic Drop" (BTS) plagirism 
Talk:Mario Acevedo

message: Mario Acevedo (presumably a different one) is also a published author, he wrote 'Jailbait Zombie' for example. No, not porn. 8-) Lots42 (talk) 19:17, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  For the record 
Talk:Æthelgeard

message: Æthelgeard is listed in the 2nd edition of the Handbook of British Chronology, where his date is given as c.950, even though he is listed before Conan, who was appointed c.930. He is omitted from the 3rd edition, and I cannot find him in other sources such as PASE, Google and Google Scholar. A case for deleting? Dudley Miles (talk) 13:39, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed he's dubious. But there are 5 confirmed people by that name in PASE. The articles should be about them, and mention him as another unconfirmed possibility. I'll rewrite it accordingly tonight.  DGG ( talk ) 13:07, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

text: Actually Æthelgeard or Ethelgeard the thegn seems to be an important person around 950, and is mentioned in a number of good sources on Google Books. He goes down into obscurity with the end of the reign of Eadwig; but before that he was a notable landowner. Charles Matthews (talk) 07:50, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

text: That google book reference was in a book originally published in 1902 - see  ... so it isn't enough to confirm that there was any such archbishop. The English archbishop's are reasonably well attested - and the list is pretty set (plus I've updated them here on Wikipedia from the Hanbook's third edition). Ealdgyth - Talk 12:50, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this article be deleted?
Talk:Sanjeev Abhyankar

message: I am request to u,
   My self Yogesh Chandrakant Patole . I am staying in Malad East Mumbai. 400097
     I am singing a bhajan. And my brother is Mangesh Chandrakant Patole. he is  allredy carrier in bhajan. he is take a classes of Pakhawaj, Tabla, Dholki. he take a Tabla Classes in Pune, Maharashtra, Mumbai. 
         Plz U can get me chance for singing Bhajan , Abhang in  your Sahyadri Channel.
I Hope U can Accept My request.
Thanks & Regards,
 Yogesh Patole.
9594537259 , 9221292214  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.221.124.176 (talk) 07:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  help, singing bhajan
Talk:Abu Yusuf Riyadh ul Haq

message: "Extensive knowledge", "selfless dedication" etc etc . This is not appropriate language for an encyclopedia.
Giordaano (talk) 14:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Long Hello

message: The recent `vandalism' and rv prompts the question - was this really `a band' or just the name of an album? (The band was really, of course, just VDGG without Peter Hamill). Martinevans123 (talk) 17:20, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I've understood, there never was a band with the name "The Long Hello". It was the name of the project, at the most, and of course the name of the album and three consecutive albums. But in my opinion it is incorrect to categorise The Long Hello as a band. Mark in wiki (talk) 19:00, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album/band?
Talk:Indianapolis Prize

message: Noting that an Indianapolis Zoo employee did much of the work on this article and that most of the article was lifted from the main website, I re-wrote/re-worded/de-puffed most of the article. Hopefully it's more neutral now and doesn't break any policies. --132 18:49, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned up 
Talk:The Re-Consumation

message: It should be noted that there isn't the instrumental in this re-release edition of the album, instead the band put a new one entitled "The Way it Was" in it's place.  Just a thought.  -- Shatterzer0 (talk) 02:33, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: No Somnabulist

message: as the images have to be copyright free i can snap a photo of the art and upload it if anyones interested ....just leave me a shout back on here havent uploaded wiki images before so it will be trial and error  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.107.6.35 (talk) 13:52, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  album pic 

message: This album classifies as a remix album instead of a studio album.  The album type should be changed. Zclone (talk) 14:52, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remix Album? 

message: User TheJazzDalek has removed album reviews claiming that they are non-pro reviews per WP:ALBUMS. "Professional reviews may include only reviews written by professional music journalists or DJs, or found within any online or print publication having a (paid or volunteer) editorial and writing staff (which excludes personal blogs)."
*Type 3 Media reviews appear to qualify for inclusion because they are an online publication with a writing staff and appear to be independent of the artists, record companies, etc.
Need consensus on the above before they should be re-added to the page. Zclone (talk) 12:35, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album Reviews
Talk:CLP Regulation

message: The lists of hazardous substances in this regulation (1272/2008) located in Annex I and II  have been superceded by a new set of lists list located in Council Regulation EC 790/2009 (referenced in #8).  This is a very large change and should not be covered by further legislation heading.  Is it possible to edit the front matter to identify this?  Can you add something like:  The lists of hazardous substances found in the CLP regulation have been ammended by EC/790/2009 and new lists are located there." then link to number 8.Pollygirl610 (talk) 18:16, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Done. Physchim62 (talk) 13:49, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In this article, does "Council" refer to Council of Europe, Council of the European Union or European Council? Biscuittin (talk) 22:45, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It refers to the Council of the European Union. Physchim62 (talk) 13:49, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Council 

message: The link to ECHA webiste is no longer working, ref. 2 should be http://echa.europa.eu/clp_en.asp
BHumphrys (talk) 13:46, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link doesn't work 
Talk:Chris Howard (American football)

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD)  20:08, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auto Peer Review 

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#:: 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#:: 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#:: 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#It is stable.
#:No edit wars etc.: 
#:: 
#It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
#:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass/Fail: 
#:: </div>
Details:
* Lede, last sentence of the first paragraph is awkward. I like the non-passive voice, but it feels non-encyclopedic to me. --TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD)  16:07, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good! It's a pass. Taking care of dotting the i's and crossing the t's now. Ealdgyth | Talk 17:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA review
Talk:R-class destroyer (1916)

message: The MOS recommends only linking dates that have a particular relevance to an article. I've unlinked all of the dates because, to me, none are really necessary for context. If anyone feels that any individual dates should be re-linked for context purposes, please do so. Thanks. — Bellhalla (talk) 14:59, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date links
Talk:There Is a Season

message: This box set also includes a DVD of Byrds television appearances.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:BD38:4A70:A5D8:77BD:5467:D19 (talk) 04:56, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

message: Could someone add details about what album each track comes from, or at least note which tracks are otherwise unavailable?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.143.4.50 (talk) 04:09, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: See my comments at Talk:The Byrds (box set). I'll try to get around to adding something over the next few days. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 11:36, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Track details
Talk:Brampton Bryan Castle

message: Some sources are provided,  the article however needs inline references.--Kudpung (talk) 08:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 