lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tribunals Service

message: I think we agree that the SSCSA Tribunal is simply the new name for the Appeals Tribunal. Am I right in thinking, Francis Davey, that you're saying the Appeals Tribunal (a tribunal) was simply sponsored by the Appeals Service (an executive agency), that they weren't just two names for the same whole?
In Hansard, here, Vera Baird seems to confirm that the SSCSA Tribunal is simply the entirely of the Appeals Service, just with a new name, by saying that "the Appeals Service, now known as Social Security and Child Support Appeal Tribunal (SSCSA), transferred from the Department for Work and Pensions and became part of the Tribunals Service." - Heavens To Betsy 11:54, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I am saying that. Its a mistake that I would expect a government minister to make 8-) and its often made. The point is that almost all statutory tribunals are separate entities legally - and the people who sit on them are not civil servants and do not form a part of the executive. On the other hand, the support service (TAS, ETS, RPTS or whatever) is staffed by civil servants and is part of the executive. This is something I felt very keenly when I worked (briefly) for the senior president of the London Rent Assessment Panel, who was very clear as to the distinction. I hope that makes sense. Francis Davey 13:06, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It does, thanks for taking the time to explain it fully. The work I'm doing at the moment includes trying to understand the way the Appeals Service changed and how their successor exists as a legal entity. We get contradicting information from the Tribunals Service themselves and civil servants in individual local offices still calling themselves Appeals Service, but I thought I'd got it understood. Obviously not. Thanks again. Heavens To Betsy 13:23, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The ''Appeals Service'' and the ''Social Security and Child Support Appeals Tribunal''
Talk:Liane de Pougy

message: Her novels "L'Insaisissable" and "Mhyrhille" were published when she was in her prime - her 20s and 30s - not late in life.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.84.186.200 (talk) 08:24, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Writings
Wikipedia talk:Suspected sock puppets/The real Barbara Schwarz (2nd)

message: Note that Barbara Schwarz has threatened to sue Wikipedia because of the article being written about her (Barbara Schwarz).  Fred Bauder wanted her input, but ChrisO blocked her for various reasons.  Fred does not really agree with the block and has suggested she not be blocked. I think any further edits she makes should be allowed to stay as long as she is not violating Wikipedia policy.  See Talk:Barbara Schwarz and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Barbara Schwarz. --HResearcher 11:57, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I feel her input in invaluable. Fred Bauder 14:57, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Barbara Schwarz]]
Talk:Vic Sotto

message: We have to fix this article and clean it up. Wikipedia isn't just a filmography. We also need a "Cultural Significance" section for Vic. He IS an icon of the pinoy entertainment community and this needs to be stated from a NPOV stance. Shrumster 19:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: Wikipedians, my creation of redirection to Vico Sotto gone wrong! That is Victor María Regis Nubla Sotto, but it goes to his father! After the article's name, there is a another Sotto on the last. I want say to you, you need to rename this article to redirect's name to a correct version, or remove it so i will make a fixed one. I will respond to all of you. You need to help me. Rdp060707 (talk) 14:38, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am in mistake! 

message: ⚰️💐 203.189.118.140 (talk) 10:41, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pepsi Paloma
Talk:Veinticinco de Mayo-class cruiser

message: Looks to me as a quite good article, except for style and linguistic errors. My intention is to help polish these, without altering the content which up to my understanding seems adequate (for this I also need to check a couple of reference books, whrn I have a bit more time).  Regards, DPdH (talk) 14:20, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style cleanup needed
Talk:Polmos Łańcut

message: What brands to they produce? What spirits? What's their capacity? What % do they export? So many questions that a distiller's article needs to answer. --Storkk 12:21, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: LOL I'll add more. I've just started it. Patience please ;-)--SylwiaS | talk 13:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: expand tag
Talk:Richard Caliguiri

message: At a blog, it was posted, perhaps by C. Briem, in part:
and just in case anyone cares.. that wikipedia entry for Caliguiri has been incorrect for years. It still says Caliguiri ran and lost against Foerster in the primary in 1977 before winning in the general. That isn't correct. He was already acting as mayor after Flaherty had taken a job at the US Dept of Justice. It was not expected that he would run for mayor and did not run in the primary at all, but later changed his mind and beat Foerster in fall general. A bit more complicated than that, but that is the short version.
My reply: If the current wikipedia page is wrong, and you knew it, for years, C. Briem, why in the world didn't you fix it? Rauterkus (talk) 14:45, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Might be wrong 
Talk:Doune

message: Just a note to say that both "hillclimb" and "hill climb" are used widely in the sport, and that the spellings I have given are those used by the venue and the Championship respectively: please do not "correct" this to be more consistent! Loganberry (Talk) 12:29, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hillclimbing 

message: Surely Deanston Distillery should be in the Deanston article?
I removed this from the Doune article  " Deanston Distillery is located in the town."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Axelmctavish (talk • contribs) 19:03, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of the Distillery 
Talk:Christine Feehan

message: I updated the entire section. The initial summary was a series of sentences copied verbatim from one of the section references, presenting a possible copywrite issue.
I moved the novel information into two tables: one for individual novels, one for collections. Added information on NY Times Best Sellers listing where I could find them. References were added, updated, and removed as appropriate. Verabuena (talk) 23:46, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Carpathian Novels 

message: I updated the entire section, moving the novel information into three tables, one for each series in the Sea Haven collection. Added information on NY Times Best Sellers listing where I could find them. References were added, updated, and removed as appropriate.
Additionally, consolidated all collections and anthologies and place near the end of the article. Verabuena (talk) 04:14, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Sea Haven Novels 

message: Revised the section, adding tables, references, notes where citations are needed, and internal links. Verabuena (talk) 21:38, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards 

message: Updated the entire section, moving the novel information into a table. Added information on NY Times Best Sellers listings. References were added, updated, and removed as appropriate. Verabuena (talk) 03:08, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:   GhostWalkers Novels
Talk:Franklin Avenue/Botanic Garden station

message: The station is called Botanic Garden on the BMT and Franklin Avenue on the IRT. If the stations are simply connected by a passageway, maybe they should be separated. --NE2 20:07, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They're not especially integrated, no. Larry V (talk | e-mail) 20:28, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If it was called Franklin Avenue-Eastern Parkway, then it wouldn't matter. But that's a different story. --Imdanumber1 (talk • contribs) 22:32, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming
Talk:Alive at the Dynamo

message: Sacred Reich is (IMO) one of the very best bands of one of the very best genres of music but that is anecdotal. Objectively, they *are* at least the bottom of the top tier or the top of the second tier of thrash bands, though perpetually under-rated. While I can't speak to this album (all I have are Ignorance, Surf Nicaragua, The American Way, Independent, and Heal) you can't be punching holes in a band's discography, IMO. Sacred Reich is unquestionably notable, therefore this EP is. It's got the infobox, the album image, the band members, the track list, and a blurb. What more can anyone want and what possible advantage could there be to destroying someone's work and erasing a bit of history like this? I find the main band article and the completeness of the infobox tracking through the LPs and EPs to be an excellent piece of the wikipedia.
Also, it's the only *one* of *nine* Sacred Reich album articles to get the 'notability' box. This seems arbitrary at best.
Plus, you'd have to edit the The American Way article and any other article that references it to remove the link. Where's the advantage in that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.221.117.83 (talk) 03:36, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion? That's crazed
Talk:Anna LaCazio

message: Just wanted to point out that singer's family name is wrongly spelt. In Italian you cannot join two parts in such a way as to have one capitalized letter in the middle of the resulting word. You should either write Anna La Cazio (btw this form seems to be the most commonly found with Google, so I think it might be the real, officially recorded name) or possibly Anna Lacazio (one word, no internal capitalization). 2.40.146.34 (talk) 20:04, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, but she's American, so anything goes.92.12.60.184 (talk) 20:20, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Portal talk:India/Selected picture candidates

message: The top image, currently an IPFP, was put up for FP and gained a consensus. I was wondering if we could shift the IPFP on to the new image, so that the older one could be marked for deletion. - doniv 08:52, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 10:23, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nishi tribal new version 

message: As it can be seen, I have added four more noms for SPC. I had more in mind, but am restraining myself as it is suggested that too many noms shouldn't be placed simultaneously. Should I wait before other noms, or go ahead with other noms (because I feel that it doesn't take much time to evaluate images). I eventually want to start a daily scheduling of images on the portal. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 10:31, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Are these other pictures you speak of, from WP:INMAP?--thunderboltz(Deepu) 14:01, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. A lot of them. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 14:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If we think of posting them for week-length on the portal page, they may not appear as good candidates. But once we start seeing them as images that will appear for a day only, the outlook changes completely. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 20:17, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we should wait until we have enough images for fixing images on daily basis.  Shyam (T/C) 09:53, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that once there are 25+ selected images, we can go for daily rotation. This would require images like India railway schematic map.svg getting promoted (which is unlikely if no one else votes). Personally, I feel that if the roadway image is good enough, so is the railway one. Definitely I won't queue them up consecutively for the main page of the portal, and would intersperce with other selected images. I think if other images from WP:INMAP, and a few others that I have in mind, are promoted, we can get real close to the daily rotation schedule. It would be great as I don't know of any other portal that does it. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 10:23, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Many more selected pictures
Talk:Lockheed P-2 Neptune

message: I don't see it mentioned in the article but there are some great photos of it 'bombing' the fire on Mt. Diablo (Sept 2013) in northern California. The plane is listed in the "Cal Fire" brochure "Firefighting Aircraft Recognition Guide". How would one find out whatever "variant" it is in order to add the plane to the list in the article? The booklet is online at http://www.fire.ca.gov/communications/downloads/AviationGuide_FINAL_webbooklet.pdf.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.60.126.7 (talk) 16:16, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  California Dept of Forestry P-2 

message: Not sure Nigel-ish, if your added source, relates to my removal of uncited detail (I cannot read it), but there are sources around that say the target was the carriers, and that Sheffield was just in the way (doing it protecting job), and was not the intended target when the mission started. The deleted text did imply that the Lockheed assisted in the sinking of Sheffield, which implies to me that Sheffield was the target. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 12:16, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Sheffield was the target, or at least the group of ships that contained Sheffield, and a Neptune played a key role in the attack, detecting a group of 4 warships ~85 miles of Port Stanley and staying on station for almost 3 hours, allowing the attack by Super Etendards to be launched. The Neptune kept its distance , never getting closer than 60 miles. The two later attacks (on 25 May that sank Atlantic Conveyor and on 30 May, that hit nothing) were aimed at the carriers but did not have the assistance of Neptunes, but instead relied on air search radars on the Falklands to give a rough idea of where the carriers were operating.Nigel Ish (talk) 20:02, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: HMS Sheffield

message: What are the crew position names in the P2? 70.95.113.231 (talk) 19:04, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crew positions
Talk:Emakimono

message: How is this unique to Japan when China also had this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.146.30.126 (talk) 22:51, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I'm removing the uniqueness claim. Trevor Talk 10:38, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unique? 

message: Handscroll is typically originated from China Zhou Dynasty when people used (ropes to link bamboo sheets) to make official records. Its silk version is also originated from China, so called Bo-shu (帛書 as silk book). 
The paper-based handscroll no-doubt is also originated from China.  (Buhuzu (talk) 00:05, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Handscroll
Talk:271

message: There is no page for the number 271 so perhaps the link to it should be taken out. RealFerrari 13:07, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? There is a redirect page called 271 (number), which redirects to 270 (number) on which there are explanations about all numbers from 270 to 279. Ludde23 Talk Contrib 17:37, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Mark Dynamix

message: Maybe instead of the various tags that now occupy more room than the actual article, we should just make a new tag:
This page is not good enough.Please make it better.
Gorman 11:55, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It is currently unclear whether this DJ is notable enough for an article on Wikipedia, since not enough secondary sources are cited. By the notability criteria for biographies, independent reliable sources are required to make sure that the subject is notable. One link is given to "The DJ list", but this more seems to be a kind of "business directory" for DJs, and the article about Mark Dynamics reads like a press release of his, so this can probably not be counted as "independent coverage".
Better sources might be, for example, significant press coverage about the person, or an independent biography. Also, if he had national/international tours reported in the press, or he released multiple albums, he might pass the criteria in WP:MUSIC which warrant inclusion. The article gives hints to that effect, but again, it does not cite appropriate sources.
For the time being, I am changing those many warning tags a bit, in particular replacing the “importance” tag with “notability”. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 09:33, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Mark Dynamix is certainly well known enough to be included on Wikipedia. He is the author of more compliations sold in Australia than anyone else and as a dude in my early twenties, practically everyone I know has heard his Ministry of Sound annual CD from this year. As a mathematician, I know there are plenty of maths people who have wiki pages who are far less known then Mark Dynamix. M0rt 09:18, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Also, the DJ list is a very well respected poll of world wide DJs and is very frequently cited in magazines. I'm including a link to the bio on in the mix website of Mark Dynamix. Most people who are seriously into dance music in Australia frequent this respected site and I think it's inclusion is appropriate as it is a third party. M0rt 09:22, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: It is not of sufficient relevance to include that he played at HQ at Adelaide. As a DJ, he plays a different club in a different city every weekend. He comes and plays at Family in Brisbane and I've seen him play many times. M0rt 09:18, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Adelaide Gig
Talk:Peter Jensen (psychologist)

message: Closing admin  wrote after a request for him to review the article's rewrite: That seems alright - I would say that the sources you have added mean that the concerns that led to deletion at the AfD have been dealt with, so G4 would not apply (and feel free to link to this discussion when you publish it). Nevertheless, someone else may nominate this for deletion if they do not think the sources are enough (that is not to say that I think it should be deleted, but I would not condone a speedy keep if someone did nominate it). Is that ok? ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 12:25, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article restored to mainspace
Talk:Adolf Seilacher

message: The current lead image, meant to be a portrait of Seilacher, is low-quality, out of focus, side-on, and with another person in the background in (relative) focus. If anyone has a better image of Seilacher that they can upload to Wikimedia Commons, it would be much appreciated. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image request
Talk:Delancey Street/Essex Street station

message: Why is the Chrystie Street Connection continually being added to this section when it has been removed several times recently? This connection has nothing to do with the tracks within this station and is superfluous to the station layout. 198.228.228.21 (talk) 02:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It goes to and from the Chrystie Street Connection. The  train doesn't continue on the Nassau Street Line. It is shown as going on the Chrystie Street Connection because it would be awkward to show it continuing on the Nassau Street Line. Get a track map and you will see that the M train gets onto the Chrystie Street Connection just west of the station. Epicgenius (talk) 14:12, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station Layout 
Talk:Madolyn Smith

message: 1. This woman's name is normally spelled hyphenated as I've changed in the content. This conforms with normal conventions regarding adding married names. Most references to her online of course contain the hyphen as well.
2. There is no link from 'Smith-Osborne' which would somewhat alleviate the error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.217.187.154 (talk) 11:01, October 10, 2007
:The actress is notable as Madolyn Smith (and was only credited as Smith-Osborne once as far as I can tell), so I've moved the article to her common name and adjusted the text accordingly. Her marriage and one hyphenated credit are duly noted.— TAnthonyTalk 23:53, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Flaws

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- GDon4t0 (talk to me...) 14:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment
Talk:North American T-28 Trojan

message: I added Royal Lao Air Force to list of users. They had 5 wings of 10 planes each, so they may be major users.
Also, I lack the skills to dub in flag of Kingdom of Laos. Would some good soul add it, please?
Georgejdorner (talk) 21:24, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Laos and its flag are already on the list of operators. - Ahunt (talk) 23:54, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: RLAF

message: Can someone advise what the distance is from the ground to the wingtip ? Preparing for a static display & need this dimension for parking purposes.
Thanks for any help.
Cbilella  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbilella (talk • contribs) 21:15, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wingtip height 

message: There is another T-28b in storage at an airfield with Marana Aerospace solutions bearing an Evergreen paint job. Tail number is N28EV serial number is 138334, it is currently not airworthy, last flight was between 2008 and 2011. I am not technological literate enough to add this to the article myself for fear of doing it wrong, and damaging the rest of the article. If some would could add this information for me, that would be great. I also have pictures if they are needed.  These two links, have relevant data to the tail number... http://www.airport-data.com/aircraft/N28EV.html  -http://flightaware.com/resources/registration/N28EV Thanks.-Bearded Rabbit (talk) 05:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  I know of more survivors 

message: T-28 Trainers were still being used at Kessler AFB, Biloxi, ME in Oct 1969, when I left the base. 173.191.51.145 (talk) 04:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  T-28 Trainers
Template talk:Live-action theatrical films based on Marvel Comics

message: Would make more sense if the templates represented MCU rather than by characters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DoctorHver (talk • contribs) 16:29, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  MCU 

message: Seeing the X-Men, Wolverine and Deadpool franchises have all been combined as Mutants in the franchise list, it is in the wrong order considering that the list is in Alphabetical order; therefore, Mutants should be in between Iron Man and Punisher. 65.188.183.223 (talk) 09:40, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mutants Catagory, not in the right order 

message: I'm not in agreement with your desired changes, particularly the formatting. No where else in the template are nested (with ** code) items used. Regarding Venom, yes, Sony has those rights since it is an adjacent Spider-Man character, but I don't think Venom should be grouped with Spider-Man like the mutants are. Regarding mutants, going back to formatting, since Deadpool is separate, it should be a nav child, not nested as you changed, and along with New Mutants. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:04, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to Venom and Deadpool 

message: Added List of unproduced films based on Marvel Comics imprints publications to the List of unproduced films based on Marvel Comics imprints publications to the unproduced films section. 92.236.253.249 (talk) 17:17, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: . Both links are the same. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (talk) 22:33, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 August 2021 

message: Added List of unproduced 20th Century Fox projects based on Marvel Comics 
:92.236.253.249 (talk) 23:09, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done, the more significant of these, e.g. List of unproduced X-Men film series projects or Gambit (unproduced film) are already listed. In addition, "Unproduced" links to List of unproduced film projects based on Marvel Comics which has an even more comprehensive list. --Mvqr (talk) 10:27, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 August 2022