Talk:WKRC-TV

message: :Image:Wkrc dt2 cw.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Wkrc dt2 cw.jpg

message: Let this link show you that you will be eating humble pie. Ken did work for WKRC. Duh!
http://www.kenbroo.com/about.html 71.72.172.177 (talk) 20:06, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Your reversion to Ken Broo

message: Are all of these people needed on the article? Most of them are not even knowledgeable. Some people are, but some aren't even cited or known to anyone. Now living in the cincinnati area, I can say that i know some, but i can't even recognize some of the names. Why are they needed? 69.61.221.25 (talk) 01:44, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: '''NOTABLE''' WKRC-TV Alumni

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in this article. Not including this type of material in articles abides by current consensus and is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). thanks Deconstructhis (talk) 15:35, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on WKRC-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121207055905/http://www.sbgi.net/site_mgr/temp/Newport%20closing_qcm5mk7w.shtml to http://www.sbgi.net/site_mgr/temp/Newport%20closing_qcm5mk7w.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060923101003/http://www.sbgi.net/press/release_2006424_158.shtml to http://sbgi.net/press/release_2006424_158.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:14, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: , Show me were this is the legal way to reference a subchannel? I have found no such thing to be true. Stations can set up their broadcasted IDifier as any thing they want. RabbitEars.Info shows CW as the .2 Call sign for WKRC. Spshu (talk) 19:09, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you even watched WKRC? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:10, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Irrelevant. What is your source that it has legal status? Spshu (talk) 19:13, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I take back the legal part, but a lot of subchannels identify hourly with a -DT2, -DT3 or -DT4 callsign. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:21, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Again irrelevant. You need a source showing that WKRC indentified .2 as -DT2. Not just "but a lot of subchannels identify hourly with a -DT2, -DT3 or -DT4 callsign."  Spshu (talk) 20:22, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  DT2 legal status