Talk:Jane Harris (Neighbours)

message: Jane did not pass-away. I removed this disimfomation. See the offical Nieghbours fan site.
--86.29.243.78 04:38, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: Could a better picture be created, this one looks rather unflatering. It's POV because it makes her look ugly and anorexic, which she was not. She got over her dieting problem early on in her story line, so it is a inapropriate shot to use on that sergeststs otherwise!--Its snowing in East Asia (talk) 19:22, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you being serious? That's your opinion, it's a free image. This isn't some fansite making Jane Harris & Annie Jones look beautiful, any other image would be the same, no point replacing it. Besides that is a picture of Jane a couple of years in...RAIN the ONE (Talk) 19:54, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The image is fine, it is simply showing Annie Jones as her character. It has nothing to do with eating disorders. - JuneGloom07  Talk?  21:09, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jane Harris (Neighbours). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5v50wsnMu?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftvweek.ninemsn.com.au%2Farticle.aspx%3Fid%3D63357 to http://tvweek.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=63357
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://tv.uk.msn.com/photos/photos.aspx?cp-documentid=153145281&%3Bpage=36
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:12, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Do we need one? She has changed a bit over the years. 5 albert square (talk) 23:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I can ask Rain for one, although I think the current one should be kept too. It shows how she looked for a longer part of her duration and is kinda touched upon in the article, as it's post-makeover. Maybe the newer image could be added to the infobox and the older one moved to the characterisation section, kinda like Susan Kennedy? Or the newer one could be placed in the return section? - JuneGloom07 Talk 23:35, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: We could also move the current image to the bottom of the Infobox? I have no idea what year that image is from so maybe it could have the caption "Jane as she appeared in the 1980s"? 5 albert square (talk) 12:23, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I find that that clogs the ibox. I reckon have a new image and do what June suggested, move it down into the characterisation as there is info about her appearance there. I have a new image I can upload, and I can update the rationale on the old one! — Hatio93 Talk 12:33, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

text:  Also, another thing I forgot to add, as a general observation usually if a second image is added to the ibox, the character has been portrayed by another person. But in this case Jane hasn't. I have gathered a screenshot ready to go in... I can add it once a decision has been reached! — Hatio93 Talk 13:39, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: As there have been no other comments, yes please .  Do you know how to do it?--5 albert square (talk) 00:59, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: All done ! Wasn't expecting the image to be that large when I uploaded it, but a bot will reduce it in a few days! — Hatio93 Talk 02:44, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New image 

message: This article contains an instance of unsubstantiated soap boxing. The character of Jane had a 'make-over' in the 1980s, but never 'acted thick'. The episodes contain no evidence of this at all. And what a surprise - the claim contains no substantiating links! Whether or not these links exist, the episodes speak for themselves. Wikipedia is a worrying place.
(86.145.106.171 (talk) 00:02, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feminist Soap Boxing