Talk:Dan Mathews

message: For the year 2006-07, let us concentrate on upgrading the contents of this page as decided: Wales to upgrade quality of Wiki. Thanks. --Bhadani 00:11, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Let us upgrade

message: He is also known for critizing a dead-man,"no shock at all that Steve Irwin should die provoking a dangerous animals". His outlandish comments against such a great man were ignornant and made him look like a total asswhole infront of the world.  )
Besides spelling and grammar mistakes, this unsigned comment doesn't criticize Irwin but expresses a lack of surprise at his demise. Bob98133 15:13, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, right!  Did you read the context?  The line is almost an implied threat except that he's not promising he'll precipitate the action, but you can't really be saying that Dan wasn't making a shock comment about how Steve Irwin deserved it.  --68.47.137.29 (talk) 12:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I could agree with you had he said this while Irwin was still alive, however Mathews was using a perfect aspect to describe a logical conclusion, as in "it should come as no surprise if someone who plays with fire gets burned." There is no implied threat since Irwin was already dead when he made this remark. Whether or not this was said for some shock value is impossible to determine with any certainty, nor is it relevant to the fact that he made the comment. Bob98133 (talk) 15:34, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually using this guy's name and his statement and Steve Irwin's name in the same paragraph or article is derogatory to Steve Irwin. Steve Irwin was a million times more "manly" than this gay loser, which attacks him after he's dead. Come to think of it Steve Irwin was more "man" than the entire PETA put together. Also did more to benefit animals than all the animal NGOs i've ever heard of. Choice777 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 12:43, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed POV comment from article

message: But when asked by the magazine who he considered influential, he joked, spree killer “Andrew Cunanan, because he got Gianni Versace to stop using fur,” a quip for which he was widely criticized.
I bet he was criticized for this but shouldn't this have references to note who criticized him? Also "widely" seems like it's POV. Maybe it should be changed to something like: a quip for which he was criticized.(with references)? Bob98133 15:31, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Should this have references?

message: -provided reference and link to newspaper interview where Mathews says that he does not condemn animal rights activists who commit illegal acts.  Other folks, apparently trying to hide this documented fact, keep trying to change the focus to avoid admitting Mathews explicitly says he does not condemn people for breaking the law.  This is, of course, an important ethical point that is worth having out i the open (unless Mathews has since repudiated that position).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.238.249.153 (talk) 18:35, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read the reference you have quoted. The word illegal does not appear in it. Mathews is quoted as saying "Peta goes about things in a totally law-abiding way, but we understand the emotions that are involved in this issue and we completely understand why people are driven to extremes, even though it's not the way we choose to do it. So as a result we don't condemn them either." If you wanted to say that PETA does not condemn extreme actions, you might be justified, although this would be the wrong article to do it in, since Mathews was speaking as a spokesperson for a non-profit. You cannot interpret Mathews words above to mean "illegal acts" as that is OR. Bob98133 (talk) 13:26, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

text: Please find a reference for whatever it is you are trying to convey and stop vandalizing the article. If Mathews supports illegal activity find a reference that supports that. There is no need to add some reference that he does not support illegal activity. The reference you cite say nothing of the sort. He says that he is drawn to extremes. He then says that PETA does not act outside the law. You can't just insert your own words into his quote or draw conclusions not based on the reference. If you insist on future reversions without supplying refs or continued vandalism, I will request IP editor blocking of this page. Thanks. Bob98133 (talk) 16:09, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

text: Enough snark, the current form summarizes it well and doesn't go into unecessary detail. Soxwon (talk) 18:13, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Editor ThuranX's revised version strikes a good balance between extremes and is supported by the reference. Bob98133 (talk) 13:07, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Does Mathews condemn illegal activities of animal rights activists?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Dan Mathews. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070606235032/http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2007/04/out_ranks_the_top_50_gays_ande.html to http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2007/04/out_ranks_the_top_50_gays_ande.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:31, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Dan Mathews. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708074236/http://bluerectangle.com/book_reviews/view_one_review/2166 to http://bluerectangle.com/book_reviews/view_one_review/2166
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:41, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified