lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jackie Leven

message: It is so nice that someone put a piece up on Jackie Leven.  He is a very good singer and a nice man.--TracyRenee 09:35, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm told his birth name was Alan or Alun Moffat, middle name possibly Armstrong but can't find a reliable source, although there may be mention in the current edition of The Word. Can anyone cite this? Mutt Lunker (talk) 18:36, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth name 

message: Jackie Leven was violently assaulted, causing him to lose his voice. He regained his low singing register, but his falsetto loss was permanent. Should this not be mentioned?Dean1954 (talk) 14:36, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assault causing loss of voice 
Talk:Inseminoid

message: Imagine a cross-over of Alien and Scooby-Doo, and you've just about got it right. -- Karada 10:03, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alien and Scooby-Doo 
Talk:Organizationally unique identifier

message: what is the singnificance of term OUI in computer networking?
:OUIs are used to construct identifiers (MAC-48 (deprecated), EUI™-48, etc.) that are used to identify network interfaces, among other uses. In this context, the identifiers become the hardware address of an interface card and are used to identify that card on the network and for Media Access Control purposes. --mlewis000 13:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial comments

message: An explanation of the OUI Registry Restructuringwould be useful Slacka123 (talk) 02:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  OUI Registry Restructuring
Talk:Martin Blinder

message: I removed the following from the page:
" and his psychiatric evaluation of the Varian Medical Systems SLAPP plaintiffs Susan B. Felch and George A. Zdasiuk in the landmark California Supreme Court case Varian v. Delfino"
Several google searches really don't show any evidence that anyone care sbout his involvement with this case other than, perhaps, Delfino himself.
kmccoy (talk) 10:50, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Varian v. Delfino 

message: From Final Witness / Psychiatrist's work echoes in personal life / Doctor known for insanity murder defenses was almost killed by ex in seemingly insane act, dated Sunday, May 20, 2001: 
: afternoon of last Oct. 6, a Friday
: in his 63rd year
The Friday is Oct 6, 2000. 2000-63= 1937, his "0th" year (which was ended by his 1st birthday). He was thus born between Oct 7 1936 and Oct 6 1937, inclusive.  --Jerzy•t 03:41, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vital stats 

message: Three part series in the San Francisco Chronicle: May 20, 2001, May 21, 2001, and May 22, 2001. Location (talk) 19:04, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: For future reference
Talk:Joseph Merrick

message: In the intro it says: "Only in 1986 it was conjuctered (note the typo here) that he had Proteus syndrome ... . This has been definitely proven in 2003 ..."
But in the medical condition section is says "However, the results of these tests proved inconclusive and therefore the precise cause of Merrick's medical condition remains unknown". It's kinda contradictory.
93.185.26.148 (talk) 14:50, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elephant Man's condition. 

message: Some refs need cleaning up: ones like "name=vigor-mungovin(2016)" which are ill-formatted, and Howell54, Howell55, and Spiring which are no longer used. Chris857 (talk) 18:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: P.S. Looks like it was fixed. Chris857 (talk) 14:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref cleanup 

message: This is completely misrepresented. Far from the centrist "two biased sources" view implied in the article, Durbach in fact takes a completely pro-Norman stance (as should be expected from an academic writing about disability; they tend to be rather anti-medical profession). Precisely how unbiased a source she should be presented as is debatable. --Eldomtom2 (talk) 22:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nadja Durbach quote 

message: Is it correct to describe Frederick Treves as Merrick's partner, as the infobox currently does?
This doesn't seem to be supported by the article.
Relevant edits: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joseph_Merrick&type=revision&diff=999150411&oldid=999139615
KingUther (talk) 13:19, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frederick Treves 

message: Ashley Montagu is said in the section here on Merrick's early life to have believed that Treves gave Merrick's name as "John" out of confusion with another Merrick. So, if Montagu knew that Joseph, not John, was Merrick's real given name, then why should Montagu himself, in a book about the man, have called him "John Thomas Merrick," in a passage quoted here? Mucketymuck (talk) 04:16, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency in Ashley Montagu's take on Merrick's given name
Talk:Kirby: Canvas Curse

message: Kirby Canvas Curse is easily the best new DS game hwever, it's interesting to see that developers are being able to create new and better games on the DS with a new way to play, rather than having the same experience as on a Playstation Portable(PSP).Posted by Pado from india living in his Den.
Please sign your posts by typing four tildes. Thanks. Sincerely, Kevin 20 5 23 26 22:24, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality of the game

message: As with Kirby Air Ride, there were empty sections posted as suggestions for content, but were never filled out. I am going to delete these unless someone has an objection. Sincerely, Kevin 20 5 23 26 21:31, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I deleted them. If anyone has any objections, please don't hesitate to say so here. Sincerely, Kevin 20 5 23 26 22:23, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  empty section deletion 

message: Ya know those big swithces? (red, blue, green) Where are they?  What levels and what thirds?  Please help.  72.74.112.251 21:52, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Swithces

message: Shouldny we put the five playable characters (Kirby, waddle Dee, Waddle Doo, King dedede, and Meta Knight) and their powers? Sonic&Mario Fan 13:46, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question?
Talk:Krypto the Superdog

message: this can't be right, i'm holding the feb 2007 issue (#4) in my hand right now. Gzuckier (talk) 02:01, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A comic book series ...  which lasted 6 issues, from 2005 to 2006. 

message: I saw the end of an episode recently in which the villain was a mischeivous purple space-monkey who used a time-freezing device to play pranks. At the end of the episode Krypto said he was sending the monkey back to Brainiac. I assume this was the cartoon's version of Koko, Brainiac's pre-Crisis pet. Could someone confirm this? Daibhid C (talk) 22:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Koko?

message: As the character page lacks citations and the series page is a bit anodyne it would seem to make more sense to me to consolidate the pages, which will also make the character stuff more robust for potential AfD etc. discussion BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 21:23, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[List of Krypto the Superdog characters]] into [[Krypto the Superdog]] 

message: Why did somebody merge the character and episode lists into the main article of Krypto the Superdog? 2601:1C1:8200:7720:F7D0:2403:7986:9075 (talk) 18:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character and episode lists merged into the main article of [[Krypto the Superdog]] 

message: Why was the episode list merged into the main article of Krypto the Superdog? 2601:1C1:8200:260:F4A0:6667:B51F:2C0C (talk) 16:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode list merged into the main article of [[Krypto the Superdog]]
Talk:Nordic League

message: Spartacus says that Ramsay was the leader. Searchlight says he wasn't. I lack source material.. Secretlondon 11:17, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have added the far right in the UK category box to this article, but unfortunatley I don't know how to add the Nordic League into the category box Dexterj 12:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  far right in the UK 

message: This article is written in a hostile tone using weasel words and emotive language.  It should be cleaned up and made objective.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.99.93.113 (talk) 02:08, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-objectivity
Talk:Sony Ericsson K700

message: I received my K700i in September 2004. In May 2005, as I was sending my phone for maintenance (defective key) I asked for a firmware upgrade. Here are futile differences I could notice between the 2 firmwares (I do not know what version was originaly shipped and what is my current version):
* Brightness can be adjusted with the sidekeys while in camera mode.
* Extra profile named "tty accessory"
* More info in the "phone status" (pressing side key out of menu)
Hence, I would like to catch the attention of the authors of this article: the information you are giving wrt the design of the phone may not be true for all units. --Winged-stone 11:18, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Firmware 

message: I just think that the Criticism section breaks the rules of NPOV. Of course if you use a sledgehammer to "repair" the phone or smash it several times to the wall, it's very possible that joystick or display will malfunction... Mine k700i, even if it's 8 months old (bought from second-hand), doesn't have any problems with those parts. Only sometimes the joystick clicks instead of going "down", but that's just my giant thumb. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.20.117.54 (talk) 16:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism - what the...
Talk:History of Manchester United F.C. (1945–1969)

message: For the discussion on why this page is being created, please have a look at Talk:Manchester_United_F.C.  At the moment it just contains the relevant stuff from History of Manchester United; I'm about to merge in the relevant text from Manchester United F.C. CTOAGN 11:51, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Why this page is being created

message: I'm proposing this merger as I was working on updating the Busby Babes article in userspace since it was so short for such a significant team. However, I came across this article today and discovered that in essence, it covers all the relevent points and any history of this period would also be a history of the team known as the Busby Babes. Since the other article isn't particular well cited, it may simply be worthwhile inserting as a redirect, but I wanted to get a concensus before I did anything as drastic as that. Miyagawa (talk) 12:12, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Busby Babes Merger 
Talk:Carpaccio

message: The classic Carpaccio is of beef - various joints may be used but typically the most tender and expensive cuts from the less used muscles are favoured
Less used by the animal in its life, or less used in cooking?  Would be good to clarify. Flapdragon 12:09, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If you look at the date of the comment, you can see someone worked in an advert for a particular establishment.  Look at the comparison here -- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carpaccio&diff=36001296&oldid=27730644 64.252.10.237 (talk) 01:25, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

message: Looking at the lede - isn't it the case that the original carpaccio was always beef and that we should say "originally made with beef but now made with other raw meats"? Seems very odd. AdventurousMe (talk) 07:26, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surely made with beef?
Category talk:Year of death missing

message: See :Category talk:Year of birth missing#Female/Male Split. --Quuxplusone 06:21, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Such a split has been proposed many times in various categories of this sort and at WP:CFD, yet never reached anything close to a consensus to do so. The only way it would ever be likely to do so would be at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography as a well-outlined, comprehensive proposal, followed by a mass rename-CfD of all of the affected categories at once. Marking this topic resolved, because it has no responses and is certainly not going to result in such a rename. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 16:24, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion on splitting these categories 

message: Per consensus at WP:CFD this category is considered "defining", and unlike most related categories goes in the actual article itself (when it applies; if the person is not known to be deceased it should not be used at all). — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 17:04, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Goes in articles not talk pages

message: A perfectly useless "category", which is simply an inflated locution for a list. Only list-makers can be concerned with such a list: the Wikipedia reader is not served. Why is this? Inspecting a category should offer depth and context to an article. Otherwise its use is simply to keep Wikipedians from crayoning on the walls. --Wetman 22:03, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Inspecting a category should offer depth and context to an article.". Categories are for the logical grouping together of connected articles, to aid navigation, for maintenance, and for many other things. True, we should aim to serve the reader first and foremost but you do your argument a great disservice by insulting people who maintain or use categories like these. --kingboyk (talk) 19:38, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Useless
Talk:South African military ranks

message: So far as I know, Jan Smuts was a field marshal in the British Army, not in the Union Defence Forces - hence my original note that the rank was never used.
Dirk L
:Actually, there seems to be controversy over whether Smuts held the rank in the British Army alone or within both the British and South African Armies. That's always the problem with ranks awarded in Imperial days. The British and Imperial Armed Forces continually swapped officers and effectively merged together. I have read that Smuts was acknowledged as an FM by the South African government as well. -- Necrothesp 13:02, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Jan Smuts

message: The level 1 - 4 appointments for Warrant Officers were replaced by new substantive ranks on 1st June 2008:
* Master Chief Warrant Officer (formerly level 1)
* Senior Chief Warrant Officer (formerly level 2)
* Chief Warrant Officer (formerly level 3) 
* Master Warrant Officer (formerly level 4A)
* Senior Warrant Officer (formerly level 4)
The WO1 and WO2 ranks remain as before.
http://www.dcc.mil.za/bulletins/Files/2008/61bulletin2008.pdf
See also 'South African Soldier, September 2008, page 17 http://www.dcc.mil.za/sasoldier/2008/Sep2008.pdf  --92.8.106.152 (talk) 17:56, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New South African Warrant Officer Ranks 

message: I have re-laid out this page - moving all the historical names to one section and bringing in NATO tables for ranks
still to do - NCO's and tidy up Warrant Officers
Any input or comments? Gbawden (talk) 15:34, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Can the warrants, sergeants, etc also go in a "Nato table"? It would be ideal to be consistent. Roger (talk) 15:48, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Reformatting

message: Help! Can someone guide me on the NATO equivalents for our numerous NCO ranks. For SAAF NCOs WO1 and WO2 are grouped together - is there a rationale or guide for this somewhere? Using this guide I can get them to fit but want to make sure its correct Gbawden (talk) 22:28, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: How about using a separate table for Warrant Officers? The United States rank tables do it because their many different sergeants fill the OR table.  
See if this mght fit better. Roger (talk) 12:45, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nato equivalents

message: The image police have removed all the non free images from the templates as apparently Non Free images cannot be used in templates. So am busy reverting templates to tables.Gbawden (talk) 06:29, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Images in templates

message: Why do we use English and Afrikaans on the military ranks of almost all the branches of the SANDF ? I mean there are 12 official languages is South Africa and English is the only language that is mostly used. I think we should remove Afrikaans because the apartheid period is over. But what do you think? Sifiso Cele (talk) 21:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language used on the military ranks table
Talk:Fitz-Hugh–Curtis syndrome

message: — Assignment last updated by UsamahCh (talk) 05:26, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: WikiMed UTSW

message: Hey Usamah! Awesome editing here. I made a few notes on possible suggestions! 
·      Is there a way to link Fitz Hugh similar to how Arthur Curtis was linked?
·      Gonococcal tubal changes may be too scientific?
·      “referred to the right shoulder” maybe can say which can be perceived as pain in the right shoulder (referred pain) or link to referred pain?
·      Maybe cite a source for the risk factors section and diagnosis and workup section, if necessary?
·      “It is important for practitioners to person for a thorough history and physical “?
·      57 kDa chlamydial heat shock protein may be too scientific?
·      Chlamydia misspelling in treatment section Chelsc.an (talk) 07:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer edit
Talk:The Hilarious House of Frightenstein

message: Iam absolutely loved this show when it aired , although I watched it in the late 70's. I would love to see it again!                                        -a kid from the 70's
----
Parts of this article appear to have been lifted, with very little alteration, from the book "TV North" by Peter Kenter () Brithgob 22:26, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  (untitled) 

message: This show is currently being broadcast in Canada on the TVLand network. I never watched it in its original run and only heard about it in the 1990s. Smith & Smith must have borrowed heavily from it for the hotel scenes in their show; it's not so surprising, since they, too, were involved with CHCH. Grandma Roses 11:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  HHof F is also now showing on TVLand 

message: Does anyone know if Count Frightenstein really is the 13th son of Dracula? If so, where does this information come from? I never heard it before. Thank you. Dory Campbell. ````
: From the character bible for the show.  This was a pure invention of the creators of the character.  Nutster (talk) 16:01, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  13th Son of Dracula? 

message: Where did the animals that appeared on Doctor Pet-Vet come from?  Were they loaned from local animal shelters or breeders or what? Nutster (talk) 08:56, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doctor Pet-Vet animals?
Talk:Infante Carlos María Isidro of Spain

message: The template inserted, "Spanish Royalty/House of Bourbon", is totally irrelevant to the article — and in contradiction with it, as it provides only the rival or liberal branch, and that with mistakes. I suggest it should be removed.--Chanza 23:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Some months ago I suggested dividing that template - and now I have done so (since there was no opposition expressed).  The template now splits at Isabella II, so the charge that it "provides only the rival or liberal branch" is no longer valid.  There may, however, be other issues with the template. Noel S McFerran 04:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevant template 

message: There are a number of times when the article expresses claims which cannot be known unless we could read Carlos' mind:
*"But Carlos who was heir presumptive to his brother refused to renounce his rights to the throne, which he considered to have been given to him by God."
*"He had no personal desire for the throne, but he was adamant that he could not renounce what he considered to be his God-given rights and responsibilities."
We can certainly report that Carlos expressed these ideas, but saying "he had no  personal desire for the throne" goes a bit far. --Saforrest (talk) 23:55, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: "When the Miguelite party was finally beaten in Portugal in 1834, Carlos escaped to England where the government offered to grant him an annual pension of 30,000 pounds if he would renounce his claims and never return to Spain or Portugal. "
Which government offered him this pension ?  The British government or the Spanish Government ?Eregli bob (talk) 06:45, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which government ? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below.  Dekimasuよ! 20:40, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Infante Carlos María Isidro of Spain →  – The page was moved from this title without discussion. Per :Wikipedia:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility), royals who held substantive titles should have them listed in their article titles. 2601:241:300:B610:0:0:0:5794 (talk) 05:19, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

text: Afaik "count of Molina" wasn't his actual title, but an incognito title, which he used to not reveal his real identity.Marcelus (talk) 23:12, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 April 2022
Talk:Ranthambore National Park

message: When I have the time I'll work on this. There are tigers living in Ranthambhore. I'm not sure exactly how many, but in the 1990's, there were about 30-45.Thylacine lover 03:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm going to add a lot to this 

message: I believe there are now 23 tigers at Ranthambore National Park. I was there on January 7,8th. The park is also poorly managed as you have to book at least several months in advance with Rajasthan Wildlife authorities, and you are upon arrival assigned a zone to which you are restricted to during your entry to the park. The Park I believe has been divided into 6 zones, so if a tiger is spotted in zone 4 and you are in zone 3 you cannot cross over into zone 4.Jayachans (talk) 06:48, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 