lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mary of Guise

message: Only 45 ?  Why did she die so young ? -- Derek Ross |  Talk
Well, that's not so short life. She lived longer than most of the notable people of her time, including her husband and her daughter.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.250.116.18 (talk) 20:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ;) Most historians believe that she died of a sickness. I think I've heard 'dropsy' mentioned, but I'm not entirely sure what it is.
It is the shortened form of hydropsy, now known as edema, and refers to an excessive build up of fluids in connective tissues.  The sufferer would appear abnormally bloated.
Rcpaterson 01:39, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sickness 

message: If she was born in Lorraine she was not born in France. I know this is picky but Lorraine was de jure independent of France in 1515. I think it is important to have give sense of how fluid borders and national loyalties could be at this time. Mary was Lorrainer, French, Scottish, and for all I know had some other loyalties. Nitpyck (talk) 04:50, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't forget that Lorraine was a fief of the Holy Roman Empire making her German as well.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 17:46, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: All the aforesaid can also be said of the NWO worthy, Joan of Arc whom even admits in her court statements to “going into France” and suchlike. Bytheway, both the hereinsaid were also crypto-Jews and Jews known to oft settle on boundaries and borders (for whatever whyfor) hence both Jewesses are born in the Bar Le Duc that borders France. 2A00:23C7:9C97:5D01:7505:447E:45EF:4760 (talk) 02:49, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't post racist rot here. That statement is FALSE, they were not Jews. 50.111.29.1 (talk) 19:06, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bio box  

message: The article needs to offer citations for its many assertions as to Mary's feelings, state of mind, physical resemblance to Madeleine, etc. Unless these issues are resolved, the article will never make B-Class. I have tagged it as C-Class.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 08:50, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The lead also needs expansion.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 08:51, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class, but article needs more citations

message: I suggest the implementation of  on this article, because of the length of the reference list. Opinions, rejections? —bender235 (talk) 00:46, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference list 

message: "After an English assault on Leith was repulsed with heavy losses"
This is confusing. Who had heavy losses, the English or the Scottish? Can we make this clear?  Omc (talk) 15:58, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the King's English - nothing wrong with it.  The Scots, of course ... 50.111.29.1 (talk) 19:07, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who had heavy losses?
Talk:William Petty, 2nd Earl of Shelburne

message: Since he received the Lansdowne title after his premiership and when he was effectively retired from politics, should he not be at William Petty, 2nd Earl of Shelburne? Timrollpickering 08:11, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: This one I'd forgotten about - since no-one has posted can I suggest that if no-one objects in the next three days that I move the page? Timrollpickering 07:56, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Recently the file :File:John Dunning, 1st Baron Ashburton; Isaac Barré; William Petty, 1st Marquess of Lansdowne (Lord Shelburne) by Sir Joshua Reynolds.jpg (right) was uploaded and it appears to be relevant to this article and not currently used by it. If you're interested and think it would be a useful addition, please feel free to include it. Dcoetzee 22:45, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New file [[:File:John Dunning, 1st Baron Ashburton; Isaac Barré; William Petty, 1st Marquess of Lansdowne (Lord Shelburne) by Sir Joshua Reynolds.jpg]] 

message: Does anyone have more details about the claim Religion	Dissenter? 
What specific sect did he belong to? --Gary123 (talk) 06:06, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I echo this question, five years on. It would be interesting to know the denomination, and when he professed membership of it. Anglo-Irish 'Ascendancy' families were usually Anglican or more precisely Church in Ireland (disestablished in 1868). I would raise a citation need if I could make it fit in the Infobox.Cloptonson (talk) 15:26, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have checked his long biography in the ODNB (2004) but find no reference to his religion at all.Cloptonson (talk) 12:11, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for Religion: Dissenter 

message: We say he was born William Fitzmaurice, but his father later changed the family surname to Petty in place of Fitzmaurice. So our man became William Petty. But we continue to refer to him as Fitzmaurice until he inherited the Earldom of Shelburne. Why? Is it because the family name was not changed until after he became earl?
Next, the article title is William Petty, 2nd Earl of Shelburne. That makes sense in itself, but it clashes with the lede, where he's introduced as William Petty Fitzmaurice, 1st Marquess of Lansdowne. What's going on here? Wasn't the Fitzmaurice name dropped in favour of Petty?  I could understand if Fitzmaurice was retained as a middle name, but not Petty, which was supposed to have become his new surname. I'm terribly confused by all this.  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 08:51, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: His father's article (John Petty, 1st Earl of Shelburne) suffers from similar confusion. His older son's article (John Petty, 2nd Marquess of Lansdowne) uses "Petty", but his Alumni Oxonienses entry uses "FitzMaurice". His younger son Henry Petty-Fitzmaurice, 3rd Marquess of Lansdowne and his descendants were known by the double-barrelled version. LookLook36 (talk) 20:52, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Name changes etc
Talk:Rachel Ward

message: I have removed the following paragraph from the article:
*The original newspaper article is unreliable and speculative:
**the Tele is not exactly Australia's newspaper of record;
**the newspaper article lacks a byline.
*The newspaper article insinuates that Ward & Brown have improperly profited from an AFC grant, but presents no evidence or facts to support that speculation (did the funded film make enough money to trigger repayment?).
*The paragraph in the Wikipedia article is a copyright infingement. Apart from the first two disjointed sentences, it is almost a verbatim copy:
Newspaper          	Wikipedia
[…]  condemned  AFC	have  criticised  Australian Film Commission
I'm going to do the same at the article for Bryan Brown. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:34, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed paragraph
Talk:Justin Guarini

message: Why was Justin Guarini/Temp deleted? That was the content of the article before someone added copyvioed stuff to the article. Johnleemk | Talk 08:39, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Birmingham/Archive 2

message: I've had to protect this page now.  Please see Wikipedia:Protection_policy.
In particular, see this bit 'The protection of a page on any particular version is not meant to express support for that version and requests should therefore not be made that the protected version be reverted to a different one.'   Morwen 18:47, May 15, 2004 (UTC)
:What, like this one User_talk:Raul654#Birmingham_Page_Protected? Andy Mabbett 23:09, 27 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Protected
Talk:Belzec extermination camp

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Benzec. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 12#Benzec until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:31, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Benzec" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: I believe something is wrong with this sentence: "It is believed that some 50 Jews might have escaped from Bełżec successfully, although most of them perished before the commencement of the "Final Solution". This implies that Belzec was in operation before the beginning of the Final Solution, 50 Jews might have escaped before the beginning of the Final Solution, and most of them perished still before the beginning of the Final Solution. This doesn't sound like the right order of things. Perhaps it meant it to say most of them perished before the end of World War II? --Somarain (talk) 19:10, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Somarain that wording appears to have been introduced in this edit  The editor who made that edit appears to have retired. Vexations (talk) 20:31, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

text: , have removed the second part of the sentence: ", although most of them perished before the commencement of the Final Solution.". The article states that the camp became operational in March 942, about two months after the Wannsee Conference which is seen as the start of the "Final Solution". Therefore the second part of the sentence cannot be accurate and it is also not supported by the supplied reference.--Wolbo (talk) 17:19, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong word in Survivors section 

message: Throughout the text it says "German-Nazi", which is unusual and improper English. The correct and usual term is "Nazi German". Please change. I would, but unfortunately can't edit. 90.186.170.60 (talk) 19:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "German-Nazi"
Category talk:Wikipedia timelines

message: Many articles in this category need to be sorted in to subcategories. -- Beland 23:13, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup request

message: Does anyone object to merging this category with :Category:Chronology?  Chronology even says that timeline is another name for chronology.  I think Timelines is the name that should be kept because there are a lot more pages with Timeline in their name than Chronology, but should Chronology be kept as the main article?  --JeffW 18:17, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[:Category:Chronology]]
Talk:Roscosmos

message: I'm not entirely comfortable compiling an extensive history of the Soviet space program in this article, but I haven't come up with a better idea yet.  Nobody told us the name of the Soviet space agency, so we could just make Soviet space program to discuss the topic, then go retrofit all the zillion articles that mention the Soviet space program.  Perhaps I'll do that when I get the time (though I wouldn't mind someone else taking it on). -- ke4roh 13:37, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Conent

message: :Other names commonly used to refer to the Russian space agency include Russian Federal Space Agency and Russian Space Agency. The aforesaid names might also represent related but different entities. It appears to be certain that Rosaviakosmos or Rosoviakosmos are obsolete names, which the Russian space agency was formerly known by.soviet
Seems that the Russian Federal Space Agency is the correct name. violet/riga (t) 10:44, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: If it has been renamed, then should it be moved to Russian Federal Space Agency? Thanx 68.39.174.150 20:15, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name again 

message: Startrek logos were clearly copied off Roscosmos logo. HardeeHar (talk) 15:39, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: And Lego Space, even though both Star Trek and Space Lego predate Roscosmos. Titaniumlegs (talk) 20:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Startrek 

message: The entry lacks definite articles and contains other broken English translations. Requires a clean-up by a native English speaker. 
Doesn't anyone proof read anything here?   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.197.197.150 (talk) 03:46, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: English?

message: Roscosmos website https://www.roscosmos.ru/ seems to be broken (for more than month now).
No CSS style and all links lead to 403 Forbidden.
Maybe this should be mentioned in the article itself.
Dfsdfaf456 (talk) 22:21, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website
Talk:Inclusio

message: This article is awfully Hebrew Bible-centric at the moment, owing to my own knowledge of the subject (or, at the very least, of the Hebrew language). It should be noted that inclusios, however, are found outside the Hebrew Bible as well. Also of note is the fact that I tried to list several examples - it would take several volumes of paper for one to list every occurrence - and that if someone can come up with better, more representative examples of the various forms of inclusios, feel free to replace them. -- Itai 14:15, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: e1xontev (pres. act. part. nom. pl. masc. of e1xw, adverbial, temporal). Strictly speaking, grammatically the participle e1xontev is joined with sth&kete (so indicated on the diagram). The only objection is the rather considerable distance involved. However, the thought of contending in the struggle resumes the concept of conducting their lives, and the grammar is regular. In addition, the participial clause provides an inclusio with sth&kete k.t.l.. The only alternative is to treat the participle as an independent nominative. Most commentators regard e1xontev as an irregular nominative (instead of a dative to agree with u(mi=n) and to assume that Paul had u(mei=v before his mind as the logical subject of the preceding clause. If this is the case, then the participle is an independent (hanging) participle.
Which, to me, makes very little sense. -- Itai 13:51, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)

text: In the Hebrew Bible, at least, inclusio is used to reveal the central concerns of a unit.  The bracketing sections are an interpretive clue as to the way the passage should be read.  Sighter Goliant 00:20, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

message: There are no sources found in this article. As I know little of Inclusio I cannot add a source. SayYourSomething (talk) 02:56, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  No sources
Talk:Leg (anatomy)

message: The content that originally appeared on this talk page's article concerned solely the human leg, and that article was moved (renamed) accordingly.  A page that then had the title this talk page now has, containing discussion (on human legs) that occurred prior to that move, was moved (renamed) to Talk:Human leg.  I regret my carelessness (at a time when i should have realized the need) in not removing before now the redirect that resulted, whose continued existence might have led some to misunderstand Talk:Human leg as being the location to discuss the Leg article. As there is no discussion there pertaining to other species' legs, no discussion was misplaced to there, but some may have never occurred as a result of it looking to someone like there was no appropriate place for it.
--Jerzy (t) 18:17, 2005 Apr 29 (UTC)
This should probably be at leg (anatomy). --Yath 04:49, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is really pretty simple. The main article belongs at leg (anatomy). It contains a link to human leg at the appropriate spot. --Yath 17:10, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: Now, there is a confusing item with whose title is the plural form, the last one; it reads: Legs. It just points back to the same page. I can't understand what is meant by that.--Imz 22:23, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  item for plural form?
Talk:Resolver (Veruca Salt album)

message: It seems there are at least two different versions of this album where at least the track order is differing.
On musicbrainz they have the current wikipedia version listed as U.S. version and the other one as U.K. version.
I bought the supposedly U.K. version in Sweden without import, so it might be european version.
The record label listed on the back is "Artful Records", but there is no tracklisting or other information about this specific version available currently on http://www.artfulrecords.co.uk/.
Catalogue ID: ARTFULCD41
Maybe someone can find an authoritative source and write this into the article?
85.225.176.237 (talk) 20:41, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album versions. 
Talk:Mirko and Stjepan Seljan

message: Unless this is archaic Spanish I beleive  Sociedad Slava Esplatadora de Mato Grosso should be: Sociedad Slava Esplotadora de Mato Grosso Kurogawa 16:28, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: "Explotadora", actually :) --Enric Naval (talk) 11:57, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: name of society
Talk:Boerboel

message: This dubious claim is referenced to the "1971" volume - can anyone identify which Volume Number of the encyclopedia this claim relates to, so that it might be verified? William Harristalk 09:33, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Dubious text removed. William Harristalk 21:55, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious - ability to kill leopards? 

message: Hey guys, I have found a nice article with video about Boerboel - https://chihulife.com/boerboel-good-family-dog/
Where should I add it? To what section? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark.barkan (talk • contribs) 10:52, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Respectfully nowhere, chihulife.com is not a reliable source, it appears to be a content farm and none of the authors appear to have any expertise in the topic area. Cavalryman (talk) 12:32, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where to add?
Talk:Kyokushin

message: I know this article needs major editing, but skimming through the article, I noticed how many statements have been made without citations where needed.
In this one instance, I have modified "Whilst knees and kicks to the head and face are allowed, owing to the nature of these techniques, injuries are rare and those that cause long-term brain damage, common in boxing, are virtually non-existent. This makes the Kyokushin style of training very popular amongst professionals."
to
"However, knees and kicks to the head and face are allowed."
If you're going to make a statement like a knee or kick to the face or head will not cause injury, you should back that up with scientific demonstration, because practical experience will tell you otherwise. Advertising-styled statements, such as the last line in the above paragraph, obviously need citation.
Nitroblu (talk) 02:42, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations in Techniques 

message: Random un-involved wikipedian here: the use of the term "legally" several times in the article text reads as somebody trying to assert the primacy of one or the other organizations. It is probably better to describe the *legal proceedings* in some kind of section called "legal conflicts" or whatever rather than making some sort of unequivocal statement. KellenT 06:55, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Legally" 

message: I'm President of International Budokia Union KyodoKyokushin. Several Times I added my Organisation base in Poland to this page but several Times it was removed. I think this is way of behavior of Steven Foo who want to destroy this Organisation because of jelousy. Please add my Organisation back. Source is www.kyodokyokushin.com
Regards Maciej Misiak 37.47.26.131 (talk) 12:23, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: . I have removed the entire list of organizations per WP:NOTDIRECTORY, so the request is now moot. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 14:39, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 June 2020 
Talk:Slavophilia

message: Was Russia's last tsar Nicholas II considered a Slavophile, or was he more of a Westernizer? --Marcus2 18:48, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Referenced information regarding their position towards the second largest Slavic group.
--Molobo 18:10, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I restored

message: For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted <B>Random Smiley Award</b><BR>originated by Pedia-I <BR>(Explanation and Disclaimer)</DIV>
--TomasBat (Talk) 13:29, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Random Smiley Award 

message: Another use of the term "Slavophile" refers to western men who have a particular affinity to Eastern European women.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.126.97.234 (talk) 03:41, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: lol, I doubt the Urban Dictionary is a good source. 99.236.221.124 (talk) 18:15, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slavophile - Alternate Definition 

message: Are there any sources out there that comment on how Putin's claims about Ukraine and his justifications for the 2022 Russian invasion are basically a regurgitation of Slavophilia?  Because reading the ideology described in this article is just like reading one of Putin's speeches.
RyokoMocha FOR I AM NYARLATHOTEP, THE CRAWLING CHAOS 05:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Putin's Rhetoric
Talk:Conservation

message: it would be more approp in this disambig page.
* nomics - too far removed for the topic and if included 100's of others should then be added.
life and removing this option without a replacement was not helpful.
: Archaeological whether it is conservation/preservation/renovation is also surprisingly a popular topic.  
: A lot of articles are not very precise in their use of the word "conservation" and in some contexts it refers to the theory and ethical movement and in others to practical activities.  In working on fixing the pages linked to the disambiguation page (in the project Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links/2007-08-02 dump) I want to fix the leave the original word in the page and make sure it links to something relevant and not to the disambiguation page.  If I was replacing the link directly, some of these articles would need serious re-writing.
: I apologise if my response to your changes seemed abrupt, but there are hundreds of links to fix and it is inevitable in fixing the links that the list of options in this page will grow - and some of them the new links will be quite rarely used and tenuous.  I am already looking for an article that deals with the conservation of paper artifacts - though why people want paper when there is wikipedia is beyond me. Stellar 11:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Most meanings here relate to (human) management of natural or cultural resources. Why aren't conservation of energy and other physics topics listed? I'd add them myself, but the fact that none are listed implies that there might be a good reason for this. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 16:19, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conservation of energy 

message: I have added conservation community to this dab page.
Rosenbergwrite (talk) 19:58, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conservation communities 

message: Please
# (per MOS:DABPIPE) change , a redirect, to Conservation and restoration of cultural property, its target, and cut the description as redundant 
# under it, append a sub-entry Conservation and restoration of immovable cultural property.
Thanks. 85.67.32.244 (talk) 15:50, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: ASUKITE 03:28, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request 5 October 2021
Talk:Gibraltar Point, Lincolnshire

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. and create dab as suggested. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 01:39, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Gibraltar Point →  – The point in Gibraltar (Europa Point) is surely the primary topic for the title "Gibraltar Point"? LookLook36 (talk) 19:48, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2 October 2022