lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:FIP World Heavyweight Championship

message: This article has been incorrectly named "FIP World Heavyweight Championship" when it hasn't been defended outside of the United States.  Just because someone calls it a World Heavyweight Championship doesn't mean it is.  Mr. C.C. 05:31, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the page to FIP Heavyweight Championship.  Mr. C.C. 16:57, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

text: From the article itself: "Following Roderick Strong's successfully defence of the title against PAC in Liverpool, England on March 3, 2007, FIP has renamed the title the "Full Impact Pro World Heavyweight Championship"."  If this is true, I suggest we move the article to include its World status. WikiFew 03:34, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh please, just because some magazine doesn't confer its phoney baloney "world title status" on it doesn't change the name of the belt. Should we move CZW World Heavyweight Championship while we're at it? Hell, how about ROH World Championship? Nosleep1234 11:08, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: First off, get over yourself.  Secondly, where did I ever state anything about Pro Wrestling Illustrated?  One defense outside of North America doesn't give it official World Heavyweight Championship status.  It should be defended outside of North America or at least the United States on a regular basis to hold World Heavyweight Championship status.  Mr. C.C. 18:42, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

text: That doesn't mean it has World Heavyweight Championship status.  Any fed can call their main title a World Heavyweight Championship.  Look at that title history and you will see that it was defended once outside of the United States.  Most of the time it has been defended in and around Florida.  Mr. C.C. 08:20, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not World Heavyweight Status 
Talk:Lâm Đồng province

message: Article needs literal meaning of this province name, and Han Tu. Badagnani 08:24, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Literal meaning/Han Tu
Talk:Honolulu Museum of Art Spalding House

message: The Contemporary Museum in Honolulu merged with the Honolulu Academy of Arts in July 2011, and the combined collections are now called the Honolulu Museum of Art. The former Contemporary Museum location is now called the Honolulu Museum of Art Spalding House. I propose that this article be renamed Honolulu Museum of Art Spalding House, to reflect these changes. Thoughts? extabulis (talk) 18:14, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm, I've discovered there's also an article on the Spalding House. I haven't done much with merging and splitting articles yet - is there enough of an overlap to merge these two articles? If the article is renamed Honolulu Museum of Art Spalding House, it could still cover both the original house and the museum. extabulis (talk) 18:20, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: On advice from the Teahouse, I'm going to move this page to Honolulu Museum of Art Spalding House. I'd still appreciate any thoughts on a merge with Spalding House. extabulis (talk) 16:46, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title change 
Talk:Auguste Trémont

message: I have added details from Wikipedia Luxembourg, and will add further details and correstions a little later. --Scotchorama 11:06, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Details 

message: Why isn't it known where Tremont was born? Why does the article start from his childhood without listing both his birthplace nor elders. Weird.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:490:A600:DBD:F7D7:6A6B:525C (talk) 00:01, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where was Auguste Tremont born? 

message: It is NOT "Trémont" has googlebooks shows: https://www.google.co.uk/?gws_rd=ssl#q=auguste+tremont&safe=off&tbm=bks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:490:A600:DBD:F7D7:6A6B:525C (talk) 00:31, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is his lastname being spelt Trémont over Tremont in this article?
Talk:Joel Chandler Harris Home

message: I think this page should be moved to or merged with the Joel Chandler Harris House to reflect the National Trust for Historic Preservation listing. BardSeed (talk) 20:55, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  01:34, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merger
Talk:The Best of Acoustic Jethro Tull

message: "biggest acoustic hits" - not really encyclopedic phrasing ? And is it even correct ? -- Beardo (talk) 13:15, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phrasing
Talk:Blériot 155

message: According to this antique postcards site, one of the aircraft was named Wilbur Wright and is identified as having crashed. The most widely-circulated photo of this type, however (see here and here) clearly has a different name on the nose - I'm guessing Clément Ader, but can't quite be certain. 
Secondly, planecrashinfo.com gives the registration of the 155 that crashed in August 1926 as F-AIEB, and the FAI gives the registration of the record-setting 155 as F-AEIB. Presumably this is the same registration, but one of them has some letters jumbled. Of course, the FAI has better provenance, but then this document gives F-AEIB as the registration of a Lioré-et-Olivier H-6. 
It would be nice to sort this out! --Rlandmann 04:16, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Identities of these two airliners?
Talk:West Nottingham Academy

message: The information within this article is inflated.  The truth is the school experiences high turnover.  In a study conducted, high turnover was classified as any amount over 50% on a yearly basis.  
The school isn't one of the oldest.  It ceased to operate for a period of years.
--
Do you have a citation for it ceasing to operate for a period of years?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.135.53.167 (talk) 15:33, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Graduated" and "attended" are sometimes viewed as being very different things.  All I could find on John Wilkes Booth was that he attended.  Please come up with a citation for "graduated."  Smallbones (talk) 22:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  JBW is a graduate? 

message: This article contains inflated information about the program at the school and appears to be more of an advertisement than an informative article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Apetterson (talk • contribs) 22:38, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement?

message: Even cited information is being removed from this site by Joseph Izokaitis, an employee of WNA. The only citation used by the school is reference to an older book written about the school, which does not contain much of the information being attributed to it. WNA, this is a Wikipedia page, not commerical for your school. Please respect the Wikipedia principles. You should not be removing information just because you feel it doesn't fit with the view of the school that you want to give. What kind of an academic institution tries to play with presentation of fact in this way?
--Diebold (talk) 12:29, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  School continuously removes content from this page without respecting principles of Wikipedia
Wikipedia talk:Gnome Week/next year

message: The purpose of the page that this talk page belongs to is to make is to have a workpage to help build the page for Gnome Week 2008 without effecting the Gnome Week 2007 page; on January 1, 2008 this page will merge onto the Gnome Week 2008 page. So feel free to edit this the page that this talk page belongs to, you will be part of something very important!  Tcrow777  talk  04:18, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ampersand (magazine)

message: This text is the closing statement of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ampersand magazine:
:The result was keep, for now. The consensus is actually to merge to the article on National-Louis University, but there is no section or article on the Polish campus. Once such an article is written, Ampersand magazine should be merged into it; if the notability of the magazine can be better established in the meantime, I imagine that it could retain its own article. --Akhilleus (talk) 04:17, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD closed
Talk:Spiegel Grove

message: The name was again changed in 2015 to the Rutherford B. Hayes Presidential Library and Museums, per website www.rbhayes.org/about-us/our-history/. The plural "Museums" refers to both the museum and the house. 173.90.65.191 (talk) 03:48, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change
Talk:Funny Girl (film)

message: The article needs refs and cites. Please help. SilkTork *SilkyTalk 13:07, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs and cites 

message: It should be included in the article that Streisand co-won the Best Actress award for Funny Girl entirely on the merit that SHE, but not Audrey Hepburn, got to vote on who should win...and the chance of her voting not on herself is slim. 85.229.56.88 (talk) 22:48, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Why didn't Hepburn (whichever one it was) get to vote? Betty Logan (talk) 01:07, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Academy Award 

message: 38.73.253.217 (talk) 00:44, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  there was a remake in 2018
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hong Kong/Participants

message: Would it be better to have the list in alphabetical order?  Rodparkes 04:33, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are willing to put in the work to organise it - go ahead.  :-D  Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 04:59, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sequencing of list
Talk:Alvor Agreement

message: hello perspicacite, you keep removing my edits without any reasons. may i add this guidline from wikipedia, which you might like to consider before totally removing my contributions again.
"focus on content, not on the other editor. wikipedia is built upon the principle of representing views fairly, proportionately and without bias. when you find a passage in an article biased or inaccurate, improve it if you can. if that is not possible, and you disagree completely with a point of view expressed in an article, think twice before simply deleting it. rather, balance it with your side of the story. make sure that you provide reliable sources. unreferenced text may be tagged or deleted - see Wikipedia:Verifiability.
always explain your changes, especially when you want other people to agree with you. if you can say it in one line, use the edit summary; for longer explanations, use the talk page and add "see talk" to the edit summary.
your contribution has been kept basically untouched. what's wrong with adding what happened instead of agreement implementation? Sundar1 (talk) 07:31, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem with your additions is that they duplicate content from other pages. This article is about the Alvor Agreement, please keep to that topic alone. Furthermore keep guidelines on good faith in mind. — Deon Steyn (talk) 07:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: deletions
Talk:Surigao City

message: There is a discussion regarding the removal of the word "city" from the article titles of Philippine cities.  This may imminently affect the article name for .  For city names which are not unique, disambiguation alternatives are also being presented.  Formal request for page move may follow after a reasonable time of discussion.  If you wish to participate, please post your comments here.  --JinJian (talk) 04:36, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: <Cityname> 
<City>


message: 200px|right
An anonymous IP editor keeps on removing the lead image, shown at right, as well as the city's nickname. The reason given is that "Photo of NEMCO is NOT representative of Surigao City" (no reason given why the nickname is removed along with it). But clearly the photo is not just of the NEMCO building but of a busy downtown intersection. That makes it certainly a suitable lead image for Surigao City, especially since there is no other free image available. Removal of valid content is vandalism, so if this image is not suitable, let's have a discussion here before removal. I invite comments whether or not this image should be removed from the infobox. Even better would be if Surigaonons would take more photos of the city and upload them to Commons:Category:Surigao City. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:35, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead image
Talk:The Super Globetrotters

message: who would transform from their regular forms by entering magic portable lockers carried in Globetrotter.  Was this the name of their van or something?  If so, it should say. --Scottandrewhutchins 20:48, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Carried in Globetrotter?

message: I've read there is a connection to the between this and the old The Impossibles (TV series) because three of the characters have the exact same powers.  Is there anything that backs up thei claim?--67.16.90.198 (talk) 22:14, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impossibles connection?
Talk:Dialog Broadband Networks

message: I think that Dialog Broadband Networks should merge into Dialog Axiata because of there is no need for separate articles for the mobile and landline on the same network. --ᴛʜᴇMᴀɴLK (Talk) 10:27, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Artifacts (The Batman)

message: The picture in this article is from Fire and Ice! Not Artifacs! Claycrow 16:41, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure about that? If so, the FURs for the image need to be up dated. - J Greb 19:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speaking of that picture
Talk:Achmet (oneiromancer)

message: Giving the fictitutous Achmet is only known through the Oneirocriticon, and that most scholarship is about the book and not this author, shouldn't this article be renamed Oneirocriticon of Achmet? Un historien (talk) 02:26, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming
Talk:Nova Scotia Trunk 4

message: From  and , it appears to be separate from Highway 104 in the following places:
*Exits 7 to 12
*Exits 17 to 21
*Exits 25 to 27A
*Exits 27 to 29
*Exits N/A to 31A
*Exits 31??? to 34
*Exits 36A to 39
*Exits 43 to N/A
--NE2 02:36, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm from the area, so I'll look at the maps and let you know what's correct Andrew647 11:34, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no conflict.  Look at  - Notice how a small section exists south of the 104 in Truro.  It starts from Highway 311 and continues to Exit 21.  This map  is incorrect because it does not show that extra section.  Andrew647 15:37, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a note, Route 4 is signed as going along Westville Road, George St, Provost St/Archimedes St, and East River Rd until it connects to Marsh St. Cavenba (talk • contribs) 01:52, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Routing?
Talk:Aeromancy

message: I found that the section on HISTORIC asspects on this religion exercised bias and thus edited it to remove imperfect tense from that section. Particularly I found issue with description of Hindu practice as a historic and seemingly extinct tradition - http://www.prntrkmt.org/divination/aeromancy.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.95.24.42 (talk) 19:49, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Alaunus

message: Where has the information on etymology given here come from? It has the look of original research and gives no sources. There is no way that PC. alamo- could give Br. Alaunos - the former is Welsh alaf and the latter Alun. Unless this is properly cited I will remove it. Psammead (talk) 15:37, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the long-winded discussion of etymology, which was uncited, and replaced it with a brief explanation. It may require expansion if other people have appropriate sources to reference. Psammead (talk) 08:14, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:Duino-Aurisina

message: Official name looks to be  bilingual, without hyphen (see Statuto comunale or Občinski Statut). I was also wondering if the article should be moved to Duino Aurisina (without hyphen). Unless the better known name in english has a hyphen... but googling "Duino Aurisina" and "Duino-Aurisina" the first one apparently is more common.   Sorry, the google search don't really make a difference between a hypen and a space... --Yuma (talk) 13:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official name & hyphen 
Talk:Alfonsine tables

message: My understanding of the Alfonsine tables is that their having a Parisian origin is not a majority view. The standard position seems to be that the Latin copies of these tables are translations of the Castilian tables, rather than being freshly calculated in Paris. Emmanuel Poulle is, as I understand it, the main proponent of a French origin. I don't have the references for this to hand right now but I'll check this next week if I get the chance.
All the best. –Syncategoremata (talk) 22:24, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parisian versus Castilian origin for the Alfonsine tables 

message: The section on methodology implies that the Alfonsine Tables were constrcuted using 'epicycles on epicycles'.  However, in the source cited Gingrich he actually makes the opposite argument, calling it a historical myth.  
While some models such as those of al-Shatir did use 'epicycles on epicycles', there is no evidence these were used to construct the alfonsine tables. Gethin sci hist (talk) 05:02, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gingrich on Epicycles 

message: I just tagged as “Failed Verification” a reference to an article, from an edit that was done in 2011—almost 13 years ago. I’m surprised nobody caught that before. And looking at the history of revisions (trying to find the origin of the citation), I realize this article needs a thorough revision. I do not have the time for that, at least right now—can someone please take that in charge?CielProfond (talk) 06:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deep Revision Needed
Talk:Sgonico

message: Does anyone know if this sentence from the opening paragraph means that 81% of the population are Slovene speakers (but citizens of Italy) or whether 81% are Slovene nationals.  It's unclear as are most of the stats on English and Italian Wikipedia for areas surrounding Trieste.  It can't be assumed that they are Slovene nationals because the Slovene language and people of Slovene ethnicity are native to this region (and not an imigrant ethnic group) although of course many people have emigrated both ways across the porous border over the years.--217.203.146.154 (talk) 23:24, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "According to the 1971 census, 81,6% of the population are Slovenes"
Talk:CHOP (chemotherapy)

message: this article separately describes the H in CHOP as being 'Hydroxyrubicin' and then 'hydroxydoxorubicin'. Which is it?
One one hand, this abstract:
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/112706492/ABSTRACT?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
says, "Hydroxyrubicin is a synthetic analog of doxorubicin in which the basic amino group at the C-3 has been replaced by a hydroxyl group...". So they are not the same.
Yet this page:
http://ctd.mdibl.org/detail.go;jsessionid=92F12340E7F4A23A86B9242140E2E2AE?type=chem&acc=C042907
says that hydroxyrubicin is indeed a synonym for doxorubicin.
"Chemical Synonyms 3'-deamino-4'-epi-3'-hydroxydoxorubin; 3-DHD; hydroxyrubicin"
Kenmcl2 04:57, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It must be doxorubicin. JFW | T@lk 06:07, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to PubChem: http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/summary/summary.cgi?cid=72398 hydroxydoxorubicin and hydroxyrubicin are same compound that is not doxorubicin but 3'-Deamino-3'-hydroxydoxorubicin where amino group has been replaced by a hydroxyl group.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanevala (talk • contribs) 17:18, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What does the H in CHOP represent

message: CHOP for DLBCL in HIV seems fairly safe  JFW | T@lk 09:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  HIV 

message: Original text uses {{ref  - It might be better to change them to use <ref  like most other articles ? Currently they allocate duplicate ref numbers. - Rod57 (talk) 18:32, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of refs and notes 

message: It would be great if article history section said when it was introduced and for what indications. - Rod57 (talk) 22:12, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was it introduced 

message: Is [R]-CHOEP similar to [R]-EPOCH? If so there is already an article on [R]-EPOCH, which should be mentioned in this article. Else, I guess the difference should be explained. --Jacques de Selliers (talk) 17:17, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is [R]-CHOEP similar to [R]-EPOCH?
Talk:The Stranglers discography

message: I found a (probably incomplete) list of US chart positions for their singles here. It might be missing some singles that charted in the 70s and early 80s. Also, it seems "Skin Deep" charted in the States a year after it did in the UK. Perhaps if this info is worth adding someone with more experience with singles charts could iron that out. Zytsef (talk) 11:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: US chart postions

message: It's called Stranglers discography, but the band article is named The Stranglers. Not sure if it's ok. --Chaosu¹ (talk) 02:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: This is from my very dodgy memory of those days, but I am certain that the above were The Stranglers with a guest female singer. I do not know about the BBC charts, but I remember this being in the independent charts of the time (1978/79). Anyone? Anyone? LessHeard vanU (talk) 17:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a bit of background information on the back cover of this record and there's some more info on p.94 of this book. Kind regards, Grueslayer 12:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

text: @LessHeard vanU  You are right. Celia and The Mutations redirects to this page, but there is no mention of them on the page. One single was released on UA, A side was Mony Mony, B side was Mean To Me. The cover included a silhouette of a band who were clearly The Stranglers. I don't believe it troubled the charts. Ringbark (talk) 20:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. You seem to know a bit about the record - I was wondering if it was featured in any of the independent / music paper (New Musical Express, especially) charts? Do you have any sources for this? LessHeard vanU (talk) 16:21, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Celia and The Mutations
Talk:Sugathapala de Silva

message: I have removed text added by User:Wipeouting that copies, or far too closely paraphrases various sources. This includes the following sources which may or may not be listed in the article:
*http://colomboherald.com/wordpress/2010/10/remembering-a-milieu-defining-dramatist/
*http://www.dailynews.lk/2002/11/13/fea03.html
*http://www.sundayobserver.lk/2010/02/28/mon03.asp
The user is currently indef blocked for copyvio problems, so I assume these sources will eventually be of use to a different editor wishing to expand the article. Bigger digger (talk) 00:17, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio problems