lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:An Inconvenient Truth/Archive 11

message: I would ask editors take a look at this series of edits  and determine whether it is appropriate for the article.  Editor User:rogerfgay added "A 1 November 2007 commentary in Men's News Daily opines that the film took advantage of growing interest in the use of the documentary style in fictional works such as The Blair Witch Project.[81] Given the backlash against the film the article laments, "It may be generations before anyone can believe, even in real documentaries."   I question whether Men's News Daily is a reliable source (and/or worth quoting) and whether User:rogerfgay has a conflict of interest given that the article on MND was written by a Roger F. Gay  who is not, incidentally, a professional film critic. These edits do not appear to me to meet the criteria for citing oneself. Since I have dealt with a similar issue with Mr. Gay on a very different page, it would be good if other editors made the decision here.--Slp1 01:59, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree it's not notable I have removed. The PETA stuff which has recently appeared also appears to be undue weight. We don't need sections on every fringe group that has criticised AIT. Iceage77 22:08, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Media section
Talk:Protected computer

message: 69.140.152.55 (talk) 03:40, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

message: This article was created because of a request made over a year ago (requested articles list). The article as it stands now is not the best representation of the topic, however it does help to somewhat have an idea as to what this term means. It also relies solely on quoting one source. I added the requests to not only help expand this article, but also to site more sources. I will try to rewrite it myself as well, but knowing only a small amount on the topic limits what I can input. Please take this article and make it wiki-ready.
--Wikinatic (talk) 18:56, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Someone on August 14, 2012 added (C)on the Internet is 'protected computer'.  to the definition. However the following reference to Title 18 Section 30 http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1030 only contains (A) and (B) clauses. Therefore I suspect that clause (C) is bogus and should be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sentient001 (talk • contribs) 04:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of Protected Computer
Talk:Institute for Research in Economics and Business Administration

message: SNF is a notable and independent research institute, well within what can be considered the borders of Wikipedia notability. For instance, a news search on Sesam provides 486 results, most of which singlehandedly would establish notability of the foundation. Including it in the NHH article would be wrong, firstly because the institute, though located on NHH campus, is neither part of NHH, not owned more than 16% of NHH, and also associated with the University of Bergen. It could also be mentioned that the NHH article is packed, and there is no place for SNF subpage on it. The independence and notability of this institute force me to remove the prod tag. Arsenikk (talk) 19:03, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Kensico, New York

message: Shout out to anyone who has any pictures of the old Kensico... - Dirkstanley 71.192.39.248 (talk) 19:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I don't believe the article is accurate in stating that "Kensico was a stop on the Harlem Line out of Grand Central Station in New York City, shortly north of the White Plains stop." Anyone have a source?Cloonmore (talk) 04:10, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Harlem Line
Talk:List of speakers of the New York State Assembly

message: RE Patrug edit summary "Morelle & dozens of others have been Acting Speakers for brief episodes. They were not Speakers." - You need to distinguish acting while the actual office-holder is absent and acting while the office is vacant. In the first case, no mention is ever made in lists, because the list shows the actual office-holder, independent of whether he is physically present or not, but he holds the office. In the second case, the office is vacant, and the next-in-line acts, in this case, as Speaker. Such "episodes" have occurred four times during the last 60 years, and these Acting Speakers are listed, see Carlino, Weinstein, Tallon and Morelle. Carlino was subsequently elected as Speaker, so that his acting tenure is not separately shown. Weinstein, Tallon and Morelle never became Speakers, but acted during a vacancy. Weinstein actually acted as Governor while Rockefeller, Wilson and Brydges were out of the State at the same time. You see, there's a reason to list them, independent from the lengths of their acting term. Please do not revert again. Kraxler (talk) 13:50, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acting Speaker Morelle 
Talk:B roads in Zone 1 of the Great Britain numbering scheme

message: For the life of me, I do not understand why you are so anti articles about these B roads. I have heard your views on these roads not being notable enough, but I have made an effort to place reasons on the talk pages which you have totally ignored and only made a negative response after making your last revert. You have made little effort to enter into any sort of positive discussion or reason for your reverts.  Why do you think that reverting pages with a description of a road, all be it some what basic,  feel that it is better to revert the article to what is just a list of B roads. Wikipedia Lists should have a purpose (see Below). If you want just a straight forward list of B roads there are list already on the web, sabre for example. 
Most B roads are ancient routes that have criss-crossed this country since the acts of enclosure which in itself makes them notable.  I have acted in good faith throughout and I refute any accusation of personnel attacks on you. I have over 4000 edits on Wikipedia and have never found such intransigence over a small issue as this and feel that this problem needs a third party who is in a neutral position to bring this to a conclusion which we can both agree to. I look forward to hearing from you.Stavros1 (talk) 20:20, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverting B road Articles
Talk:B roads in Zone 3 of the Great Britain numbering scheme

message: 212.137.63.86 (talk) 12:44, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dorset roads completed 

message: Just a word of warning, SABRE's wiki is not a reliable source. Wikipedia policy does not allow articles to be sourced to other wikis, even our own. Can someone please find sources to replace the use of SABRE here? Thanks, Imzadi 1979 →  19:44, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of SABRE as a source
Talk:B roads in Zone 4 of the Great Britain numbering scheme

message: I note that you have altered a terminus of this from Solihull to Earlswood. All maps show it as Solihull; has there been a recent change? And, if so, where exactly does it now end - there seems to be no obvious point/junctions at Earlswood. Best Wishes Saga City (talk) 16:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  B4102 road 

message: There doesn't seem to be any consistency in respect of county names. Should all place names have the county attached, or none, or doesn't it matter too much? I don't know whether there's any guideline on this.  Tony Holkham (talk) 23:23, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  County names 

message: tried to add B4347 but find the process unnecessarily complicated. After I went to "Show Preview" to see how my edit looked, I wanted to continue editing but the only options were leave the page so I lost my edits. Don't see why it is so unhelpful
Noel Ellis 08:38, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  editing
Talk:B roads in Zone 6 of the Great Britain numbering scheme

message: I've updated the B660, I've stuck to just a facts that can be verified by anyone looking at a map, I'm not sure how or where to source anything else that I might have added - such as it being a popular route for motorcylists or part of the road having been widened for an RAF base, so I didn't.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.148.228.64 (talk) 18:52, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  B660
Talk:Sonoma GT

message: Sonoma GT → GMC Sonoma GT — For the simple reason that the manufacturer's name is missing as per naming convention —Willirennen (talk) 19:23, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: True as far as it goes, but GMC Sonoma GT redirects to Chevrolet S-10. It would make sense to merge this into that article instead, if they are talking about the same vehicle. Dekimasuよ! 07:29, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Flame arrester

message: This article needs more work on explaining the theory and principle of operation. I am not a scientist or engineer, so I don't know these details.
It appears that a flame front is sustained and propagated by:
* close proximity of a fuel source and oxidizer to the flame front
* radiant heat emission from chemical reactions occurring in the flame front
A flame arrester may function primarily as a heat absorbing wick, absorbing the radiant energy from the flame front that is chemically decomposing in mid-air. By wicking away the radiant energy, the remaining radiant energy is not sufficient to trigger self-ignition of the fuel source beyond the screen.
An explosive flame front tends to burn only a thin layer of the combustible mixture, and once the flame front passes, the flame is not sustained because all the fuel has been consumed. It seems likely that the arrester just needs to be capable of withstanding that sudden burst of radiant emission to stop the spread of the fire. The mesh can probably be considered to be like a shade for infrared radiation, stopping it from shining through into the flammable mixture on the other side. 
Stopping flame spread isn't some magical property of small holed meshes. If the wire mesh were itself directly heated from some non-flame heat source to the self-ignition temperature of the fuel surrounding the mesh, it would serve to ignite the fuel itself due to radiating its own heat into the fuel.
Probably a series of stacked tubes would work, and also closely space metal sheets. It would be interesting to see how small of a tube diameter or sheet spacing is necessary for a flame front to not be able to continue burning within the diameter or width of the tubes/sheets, using combustible fuels of various types.
DMahalko (talk) 22:19, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effect of radiant ignition beyond the barrier?
Talk:Warner's Ranch

message: Photos and/or photo uploads are needed.
*HABS photos linked in article are public domain and can be uploaded.
*Some or all of the NRHP photos linked in article are NPS owned, hence public domain and can be used.
*New photos are needed.
:speaking of photos.. that first B&W photo top of your page, is NOT Warner ANYTHING.. it's the Kimble-Wilson Store.. just a couple miles east of Warner-Carillo Ranch House, Butterfield Stage stop, on S-2. Now sits melting away in field, slowly falling apart much like the W-C was, before IT was beautifully restored. See links below re: SOHO website, thx! 2602:304:CDAF:A3D0:A19A:1D4A:9180:DF9 (talk) 18:19, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: There are two separate locations discussed in this article and it gives the impression that they are both the same, whereas they are miles apart and owned and administered separately.
: The Warner-Carrillo Ranch Househttp://www.sohosandiego.org/warners/ is what this article starts to discuss. It is owned and maintained by the non-profit Save Our Heritage Organization as a historical museum.
: The Warner Hot Springs Ranch Resorthttps://www.warnerspringsranchresort.com/ is where the hot springs are located. This is where the story of the Cupa people and their eviction from the property should be covered, IMHO. 
: In addition, name "Warner's" does not appear as the official name of either of these entities. It doesn't appear in the name of the town of Warner Springs either. San Diego county document.http://www.sandiegocounty.gov/pds/regulatory/docs/WARNER_RANCH/WARNER_RANCH.html refers to it as "Warner Ranch". Although there are occasional exceptions, I'd vouch for the "Warner" usage and lose the "Warner's".
Kortoso (talk) 17:41, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflates two locations
Category talk:Scholars in Eastern Orthodoxy

message: Is this supposed to be Scholars of Eastern Orthodoxy?  Or Scholars who are Eastern Orthodox or within the Eastern Orthodox church? --Lquilter (talk) 19:43, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: of or are

message: * :Category:Scholars in Eastern Orthodoxy to :Category:Eastern Orthodox scholars – C2C. 142.160.131.220 (talk) 19:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opposed speedy move request
Talk:HMNZS Pukaki (F424)

message: I've assessed this article as Start class for Ships and MilHist, and filled in the B-class checklist. I've marked B1 (sourcing) as yes, but consider it borderline, as while all paragraphs carry at least one inline citation, it is all to the same source. -- saberwyn 21:50, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessessment
Talk:HMNZS Taupo (F423)

message: A query has been raised at the shipindex page HMNZS Taupo regarding the pennant number for this frigate. Please see Talk:HMNZS Taupo#First Taupo pennant number. -- saberwyn 12:43, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query about pennant number
Talk:HMNZS Hawea (2007)

message: :HMNZS Hawea (P3567) → HMNZS Hawea (P3571) — This is the pennant number according to the RNZN website. P3571 was also used for HMNZS Hawea (1975). XLerate (talk) 07:32, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The source is already listed in the External links section. And I did add a few details like cost already , think it's your turn :-) XLerate (talk) 14:58, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:HMNZS Pukaki (1975)

message: These small patrol craft were ordered by the Labour government, and in service by 1975. I think it is improbable that the National Party then in opposition would call them "ridiculously expensive and militaristic for fisheries protection". They have the usual armament for a fisheries vessel - being almost unarmed - so could only be called militaristic by a pacifist. Is there a source for actual criticism - if there was any.Royalcourtier (talk) 09:56, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opposition
Talk:HMNZS Wakakura (T00)

message: The redirect SS Wakakura has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 18:33, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirect replaced with corrected format - see SS Wakakura NealeWellington (talk) 23:29, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:SS ''Wakakura'']]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Category talk:Labor studies scholars

message: Created this category Nov. 2007 as part of :Category:Labor studies.  Need to do significant work to gather the various academics & scholars who have done work on labor studies; right now there is no single category which puts these people together, although it is a body of work (as evidenced by academic associations and journals). Also needs head article. Project for November-December 2007.  --Lquilter (talk) 19:51, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:HMNZS Endeavour (1944)

message: In the second source American Naval Fighting Ships, the entry for HMS Pretext includes the words: "She continued in this duty until 1961 and scrapped". In the article intro, the main body and the infobox, it states: "foundered off the coast of Canada in November 1982". So, we have a 21 year discrepancy and unanswered questions here, assuming that Pretext and HMNZS Endeavour are one and the same.
Anyone know which is the right 'fate'?
RASAM (talk) 15:52, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I served aboard an HMS Artic Endeavour in 1965, as part of a geophysical exploration team.  At that time, home port was Halifax, NS; though, we worked from Sydney, NS to explore the Grand Banks.  One brief stop in New Foundland.  This same ship was also covered briefly in a Natl Geo 1983 television special (though, likely produced prior to 1983) concerning the hunting of infant harp seals.  This ship was launched in 1944 and appears to be the same vessel; so, the offshore New Foundland fate seems more likely.  Not a definitive answer, but perhaps useful information. DL1965 (talk) 17:52, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A rather belated thankyou for the info - I'll put this page on my watchlist now.  RASAM (talk) 22:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion
Talk:List of American supercentenarians

message: Amy Barnard born in North Carolina in 1750 is listed on the North Carolina census for slaves over 100 years of age. She is 110 in 1860. She is listed under her owner Joseph Barnard of Buncombe County, North Carolina.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mnorman16 (talk • contribs) 12:53, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

message: Henry William borne 117 yrs old Charlotte nc 75.170.154.125 (talk) 12:36, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  117 year old mr borne just released from prison is the oldest person in us that I can find. 

message: Maria Branyas, who is living, should be listed as being 117 years and 2 days old today, but is showing up as 116 years and 363 days old. I can't figure out what's wrong to fix it. WordwizardW (talk) 04:03, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maria Branyas' age 

message: There are two living people on this list, one, the oldest born in the USA (and also the oldest in the world), and one, the oldest actually living in the USA (since the other one now lives in Spain). Will this list of the 100 oldest stay unchanging with no living people in it once these die? WordwizardW (talk) 01:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Depends on when they die. The next person who may enter the top 100 oldest Americans is Naomi Whitehead, who would do so in about four months. Softmist (talk) 18:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  When the two oldest living die, what then? 

message: Though I added Secundina Camarena to the list of 100 oldest known Americans in January, upon reviewing her GRG validation report, I feel that she should be removed. There are several details surrounding her case that are concerning:
*The GRG claims that Camarena understated her age by 13 years . They also theorize that . Most importantly, though, they admit that these theories . Should we trust a validation shrouded in speculation?
*The GRG had considered the case debunked before it was validated: 
*The GRG credits the Social Security Administration (SSA), presumably through which Camarena was listed with an 1891 (as opposed to 1904) birth year, as the primary source of her validation. However, several long-standing supercentenarian cases that the GRG accepted as validated from Kestenbaum's SSA study were later debunked, including "117"-year-old Lucy Hannah and "114"-year-old Mathew Beard.
All of this makes Camarena's validation at age 113 a bit dubious, in my opinion. If another organization (e.g., LongeviQuest) releases a report on the case, we can certainly revisit this, but for now, I don't think we can confidently list her as one of the "100 oldest known Americans." Softmist (talk) 04:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secundina Camarena
Talk:Short Pump Elementary School

message: Please hold on while i and my friends write this page. Please don't delete this page thanksInspiron600m (talk) 20:09, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article really really needs to support why this elementary school is notable.  A list of classes and teacher is not it.  --Rocksanddirt (talk) 20:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding Speedy Deletion note 

message: Could i some how request help for this page. Inspiron600m (talk) 20:15, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: inspiron600m

message: [http://www.richmond.com/education/output.aspx?Article_ID=2492916 Rich in History
Short:Pump Elementary is rich in history and talent]
Helping a Bullied Child
not sure if these will be enough to estabilish notability for the school.  --Rocksanddirt (talk) 22:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: potential references

message: I'd like to find a way to somehow take away the deletion tag. Could any Admin look over the page?-BlueAmethyst .:*:. (talk) 18:35, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is undergoing an Articles for Deletion debate to determine consensus on what to do with it. These debates usually last for at least five days. Because the tag serves as notice that this debate is current, it cannot be removed until the matter is resolved. — TKD::Talk 19:54, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok. Thanks for responding.-BlueAmethyst .:*:. (talk) 19:01, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, seems as if the article wasn't deleted after all...-BlueAmethyst .:*:. (talk) 22:27, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD tag

message: Due to WP:N, and that elementary schools should not be stand-alone articles, I propose that htis article be redirected toward Henrico County Public Schools. ► Wireless Keyboard ◄ 19:57, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Redirect
Talk:Ford LTD (Australia)

message: I have undone the redirect of Ford LTD (Australia) to Ford Fairlane (Australia) 
for the following reasons: 
* The LTD models are not adequately covered on the Fairlane page
* The 1973 to 1979 LTDs were much more than just rebadged Fairlanes. 
* The Landau, which is covered on the LTD page, is not mentioned on the Fairlane page
GTHO (talk) 03:36, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect Undone
Talk:Holden Apollo

message: I have converted the article into a disambiguation page as per standard WP:CARS protocol for rebadged cars. Content has been shifted to Toyota Camry#V20 and Toyota Camry (XV10). As a result of this, I have had to remove the page from the list of good articles. OSX (talk • contributions) 02:51, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conversion to disambiguation page
Talk:Dark Spirit (Beauty and the Beast)

message: I know I'm fairly new at this, so if I've done the wrong thing by opening this talk page, please let me know. However, I don't understand WHY this page was flagged. I added a short summary and a few details to a show I used to was as a kid, and thought others might be interested. I'm sure there are others like me out there and would like my page to remain, as I intend to add more of these summaries. 
Acki (talk) 20:27, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see WP:EPISODE and WP:N.  Individual episodes of television shows are rarely notable (as defined by Wikipedia's policies).  It's unlikely any of the Beauty and the Beast episodes are individually notable, possibly excepting those which were subsequently novelized.  None of them received any major awards or (as far as I can tell) were the subject of full-length, independent, published commentary or criticism.  I'm therefore redirecting the episode pages to the "List of…" article, and removing the episode links from said article. —Psychonaut (talk) 17:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC)