lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Koenig & Bauer

message: The production figures given for the Gutenberg and Stanhope versions of presses should not be represented as "per hour". Their production figures are actually of per day of approximately 9 working hours.
I do not have reference books (i.e., Wolf or Bolza) in front of me to confirm this, but I did read this about 50 years ago in Moxon's history of printing and other books written contemporaneously to the "old style" press. At that time, press production was so slow that it was reckoned by days, not hours.
Anyone who has used either old style press would confirm that these numbers of impressions with a crew of 2 would be per day with a well skilled crew.
Operation of the old style presses was extremely laborious. Expecting that a crew of 2 people could hand-ink a forme with ink beaters, lay a sheet on the tympan, roll the forme under the platen, pull the impression, roll the forme from under the platen, remove the sheet and place another sheet on the tympan in the course of either 15 seconds or especially 7.5 seconds is totally unrealistic.
The Koenig and Bauer press design was revolutionary in using an impression cylinder and inking rollers, with a double feed table, freeing the 3 person crew to print more than 800 impressions in an hour as opposed to the 2 to 4 days required depending on the old style press we're speaking of, a phenomenal increase in machine production of well over 1,800%. 98.175.1.118 (talk) 19:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production per day vs production per hour
Talk:Alasdair Morrison (banker)

message: What is the point of tagging the article for neutrality without making a statement in the talk page. I can see an issue with POV statements like "Morrison is known among his peers and colleagues as hard working, incredibly intelligent but reserved, having quickly worked his way up the corporate ladder from the bottom ranks shows his talent and skill in corporate management", but at least justify the tag.1812ahill (talk) 01:45, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Knology

message: This article doesn't seem very encyclopedic in tone.  It reads like a company brochure.
--207.98.203.74 (talk) 01:51, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Knoll, Inc.

message: Knoll is now a subsidiary of Herman Miller (which is now called MillerKnoll). Should the two be merged at some point in future? I'm pretty new to WP editing and don't yet have the technical skills to take this on, but I'd be glad to help with the writing and sourcing. (I'll put a similar message on MillerKnoll talk page.) Cheers Cl3phact0 (talk) 07:18, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with MillerKnoll? 

message: There are two people listed in the "Notable designers" section whose relevance here is questionable: Evan MacDonald "Before competing in the Olympics, Evan worked at the Knoll furniture company and helped design some of their products" is hardly justification for inclusion on this list; Charles Pfister has no apparent relation to Knoll (although perhaps this link is simply the wrong Charles Pfister). -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 06:19, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable designers? 

message: Hello , I thought that the inclusion of David Adjaye, Marc Newson, and Ini Archibong in the lead added a broader and more contemporary sense of the the company's reach and activity (rather than just the usual 20th c. heavyweights). The designs by these three are significant products for Knoll. Not sure why you appear to be set on trimming them. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 18:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead
Talk:Klutz Press

message: Klutz books are very rare to find so you should open your eyes.
Klutz is with Scholastic books.
I found my Klutz book at my schools book fair♦ .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.64.77.6 (talk) 00:37, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Klutz 4 girlz
Talk:'Ubayd Allah ibn Bakhtishu

message: Please discuss the origins of the Bukhtishu family on the Bukhtishu article, to avoid scattered comments and repetitions.--Zereshk 21:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: He lived to be 118?  Rathfelder (talk) 21:34, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age
Talk:Kissinger Associates

message: What exactly is this supposed to mean? Are there any consulting firms that routinely reveal all their inner workings to the public? It is entirely possible that Kissinger Associates is more secretive than most - but if so, we need a source that says so, and explains what this secrecy entails. As it stands, this looks little more than the usual conspiracy-theory nonsense that Kissinger seems to attract. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:07, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "its specific activities are not public knowledge" 

message: Is the death section relevant for this article? Shouldn't that stay on the Henry Kissinger page? TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 04:30, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death Section
Talk:Kipa (supermarket)

message: http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2014-05-27/tesco-s-turkey-stores-face-uncertainty-as-merger-talks-collapse.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.114.16.214 (talk) 18:36, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talks to sell Kipa 
Talk:Heartland (novel series)

message: ----
is this fiction or nonfiction
Fiction.Transcendentalstate 18:33, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

message: This article is of dubious quality, and should be significantly improved, preferably by someone who has read the series and has a firm grasp on grammar.Transcendentalstate 18:33, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article quality

message: Someone put the descriptions of the books!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.121.17.30 (talk) 01:09, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Books 

message: I notice previous edits have removed several characters. Is there a reason for this? Perhaps it was because some of the characters described are relatively minor? The revision that was current earlier today had a description matching Soraya as the second half of Jack's description. I just figured we could talk about which characters should be there, although I undid a previous edit. Another previous edit had also removed descriptions for characters such as Matt and Lily. I'm just wondering why. There were other options available, like splitting characters into primary and secondary characters.Sailor7sakura (talk) 19:15, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters
Talk:King Records (United States)

message: King Records is not Defunct. There are still compact discs being issued on the label, therefore, I am removing this label from the Defunct Category. Garr1984 19:24, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, Gusto Records is either issuing themselves or licensing to others CDs issued on the King label.  Gusto has a rather crappy web site at  Steelbeard1 19:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Defunct! 

message: Add to the roster of King records and Starday records and Gusto records:  Guy Mitchell174.19.110.194 (talk) 23:02, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  King Records - Roster
Talk:Aircraft Repair Plant 410 (Kyiv)

message: My uneducated guess is that the company serves all Antonov models that would physically fit in their not very large hangar:) I mean what else models, except for listed, are out there? Gigantic An-124, An-22 and an-225? The same may be true for Boeing planes. Ukrained2012 (talk) 11:58, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we need exact models of the planes 
Talk:Kidde

message: Kidde recently stopped manufacturing it's wireless sounder device after threats from it inventor to sue for patent infringment.  Patent  6,420,973 Again big company stealing little inventors idea.  Making million without paying the inventor a dime  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Firstescape (talk • contribs) 14:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

message: The article says: "It was acquired by Williams Holdings in 1988"
erm... wasn't it Hanson that bought Kidde ?
86.25.123.17 (talk) 21:32, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Williams or Hanson ?
Talk:Keystone View Company

message: I have done extensive research on the Keystone View Company, reading company publications and many of the remaining letters and various internal company documents. I've read newspaper articles, numerous reference books on the stereographic field, searched courthouse records, and even tracked down founder B.L. Singley's gravesite. 
Hopefully this major edit of the current Wikipedia article will be a useful reference source for all who seek information on the Keystone View Company. 
--Karenthewriter (talk) 19:00, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:KeyPoint Federal Credit Union

message: --Pearrari (talk) 06:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Removed tags from main article.  Added links to make article less of an orphan.  WIth the Wikipedia Forever project currently in place, it seems counter-productive to mark this article for deletion, even if it does seem small or insignificant.  "Wikipedia seeks to create a summary of all human knowledge," and as such deleting this article (or any non-duplicating article) seems to go against that goal.  Please assume good faith.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.39.0.195 (talk) 17:14, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Keyhole, Inc

message: The page states that one of the customers is Middlesex County Sherrif's office. Does anyone know in which state this county is, since there are several.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.48.7.210 (talk) 23:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Infobox national military

message: How to control it? Want to move website URL up out of "Related articles" to below "Headquarters" label. Quercus solaris (talk) 00:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Position of labels and parameters

message: There is a request posted at WT:MILHIST to add an "anniversaries" parameter to this infobox, similar to the one in the . Thanks -  theWOLFchild 04:31, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: add military intelligence agency parameter? bi (talk) 16:57, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  military intelligence agency parameter 

message: Would it be possible to change "Percent of GDP" to "% of GDP"? Percent is primarily US English, % would remove any WP:ENGVAR issues. Stolitz (talk) 02:32, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requesting edit
Talk:Kent Building Supplies

message: Nova Scotia stores; The Halifax, Dartmouth, and Lower Sackville stores are ALL located within the rather vast Halifax Regional Municipality. Confusingly, all three stores are also located within Metropolitan Halifax, making the "Halifax location" very difficult to pin-point and disambiguate without linking it directly to (the former) City of Halifax article... much in the same way the Dartmouth location links to Dartmouth, Nova Scotia (former city).
It is not my intention to damage or disrespect the work of another editor, but linking the Halifax location to HRM (a region which sprawls a whopping 2,120.05 sq mi) is vastly ambiguous in this case, and somewhat grammatically incorrect. -- WikHead (talk) 19:54, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halifax ambiguity
Talk:Kensington Computer Products Group

message: I propose that Kensington Security Slot be merged into Kensington Computer Products Group. The former does not appear to meet WP:PRODUCT. The Products Group article states that it is best known for this lock. -- Trevj (talk) 13:47, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree, the article is well written and I do not think that it would make sense to merge it. Also, I think common sense as well as policy needs to be applied. W.D. 18:01, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Common sense is one thing... but how does it meet WP:PRODUCT? -- Trevj (talk) 13:04, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's more of an interface than a product I believe, like USB. While Kensington may also manufacture the locks, they aren't the only ones AFAIK, so it's more of a specification. --24.213.158.1 (talk) 13:43, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. Looking at Kensington Security Slot Specifications for Hardware, I see what you mean. But where are the independent sources which establish that this interface (which is still a product, even if also licensed to others) is notable in its own right? -- Trevj (talk) 14:24, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

text: I would say keep it on its own page. The lock slot is not always associated with the Kensington brand (the slot is commonly referred to as "the lock slot"), and the slot is found on thousands of products made by hundreds of different companies. If this page were merged into the Kensington page, it would take up a significant chunk of that page (more then necessary).-- Anc516 (Talk ▪ Contribs) 20:13, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal from Kensington Security Slot
Talk:Kenco

message: The "Products" section looks a teeny bit biased. Looks like it was lifted in full from the company's website, or promotional material. If that's the case, it could either do with re-writing, ideally from somewhere neutral, simplified and summarised, or else at least put a link to where the information came from. 
The information about Kenco's history is interesting, it's not a pure adverticle. But the Products bit seems a bit out of character for Wikipedia's general aims and principles. 
188.29.165.112 (talk) 19:31, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 
Talk:Kemppi

message: A paid editor made contributions to this article, and has disclosed that fact on this page, therefore the paid contributions template is a matter of fact and does not require discussion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 13:36, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the policy "if you place the Paid tag, you should promptly start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what is non-neutral about the article." As a paid editor I'm not allowed to remove the tag myself, but if any volunteer editor thinks that the neutral point of view of the article is ok, they are free to remove the tag as told in the Template:Paid contributions instructions: "If you do not start this discussion, then any editor is justified in removing the tag without warning."Jjanhone (talk) 17:06, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello Doprendek & Mx._Granger! You've edited this article earlier, do you see some problems in its content? Jjanhone (talk) 13:21, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no opinion; I only edited this article to fix a formatting issue. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 15:06, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Paid contributions tag
Talk:Kellerbier

message: I find Silktork's position (that "Kellerbier" does not merit its own article) most convincing, especially in light of Michael Jackson's remarks.  It's a term for a set of beers that belong to various styles.  But wouldn't it be a good idea to salvage some of the information from this page, rather than simply deleting it?  I'd have done it already, but I didn't want to get into what is beginning to look like an edit war.  Dunkelweizen (talk) 13:42, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a style http://beeradvocate.com/beer/style/131 Tstrobaugh (talk) 16:19, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: BeerAdvocate.com isn't an authority; it's an online community of beer drinking enthusiasts. The BA.com style list is problematic for lots of reasons, as plenty of other WPers will attest. That's fine, for BA's purposes, of course--it's not supposed to be academically rigorous; it's just supposed to help expose people to beer. But for the stricter goals of Wikipedia, don't you think Michael Jackson trumps the Alström brothers on this matter? I hope you're considering all sides of this matter, Tstrobaugh. Dunkelweizen (talk) 19:09, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  [] BJCP style guidelines]p. 57 lists kellerbier as a "minor style". I was just in Germany, I ordered the Schlappeseppel kellerbier, that's what the Brewery calls their style of beer. You can't have any better empirical evidence than that. Tstrobaugh (talk) 20:13, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salvaging Kellerbier info 
Talk:Kehot Publication Society

message: Are there sny sources, or articels about kehot that can be linked to bvy the article, for further reading?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.201.58.147 (talk) 17:16, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's one: http://www.timesofisrael.com/two-centuries-after-the-death-of-its-founder-chabad-launches-year-long-celebration-with-reissue-of-his-works/ | MK17b |   (talk)  20:39, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles on Kehot

message: Any way we could use this image - logo - a much better version of logo from HE wiki page? | MK17b |   (talk)  21:00, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo
Talk:1987 in Australia

message: Ref for mobile phone is SMH 23 Feb 2007--Golden Wattle  talk 21:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added to article. Graham87 12:34, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Re the addition of the first NOWSA (Network Of Women Students Australia) conference, which is partially my fault: I don't think this event fits in this sort of article at all; articles like this usually contain events that have received lots of sustained media coverage from *all* newspapers and TV stations ... the sort of things that would head a nightly news report, say. I don't think an academic conference about *any* topic qualifies here. While not directly related (or current), the points in Wikipedia:Recent years are relevant to this situation. I had a few articles about years on my watchlist for some time so I'm familiar with guidelines and expectations in this space. Graham87 08:26, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOWSA
Talk:KBP Instrument Design Bureau

message: I see they are a branch of KBP now, so I've added them here. Someone not using his real name (talk) 04:17, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  TsKIIB SOO 
Talk:KAZ

message: this pages should be join them:
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KAZ_%28disambiguation%29
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaz_%28disambiguation%29
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KAZ
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaz
--Maestrotaku 20:17, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  kaz
Talk:Kay Musical Instrument Company

message: My first electric guitar was a Kay. A cheesy Gibson SG copy with a thin (3/4") plywood body and very cheap hardware (e.g. open 3-in-a-strip tuning heads). With the ghastly tremelo removed and a decent bridge it was remarkably playable for such a cheap instrument. My friend had its 'stratocaster-shaped' twin with the same hardware (we both bought them from the same second hand shop and played them through bodged Dansette valve record players).
I see no mention of these guitars in the article.
I still have mine... The Yowser (talk) 13:01, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cheapos in the 70s? 

message: Stromberg's Electro was not the first commercial electric guitar. The Electro line was certainly announced Oct. 20, 1928 in industry journal The Music Trades. Four instruments appear in a 1929 CMI catalogue under the heading STROMBERG ELECTRO INSTRUMENTS / Electrically Amplified Guitars, Tenor Guitars, / Banjos and Mandolins. This indicates that "Electro" refers to the pickup and its amplifier, and that an Electro is no more a model of guitar than is DeArmond's Rhythm Chief. The Electro device was a contact microphone rather than electromagnetically coupled to the strings: "The electro–magnetic pickup is built within the instrument and is attached to its sounding board" and "used a 'vibration-transfer rod' from the guitar's sounding board attached to magnets inside the guitar." Finally, it's doubtful the Electros were ever put into production; there's no evidence the line was mentioned after 1929.
* https://www.ultimate-guitar.com/articles/features/what_the_first_electric_guitar_in_history_looked_like-69141
* http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/audio/a20997/who-invented-the-electric-guitar/
* https://reverb.com/news/who-really-invented-the-electric-guitar
* http://www.vintageguitar.com/3657/stromberg-electro/
And though Kuhrmeyer controlled both companies, that does not at all establish that Kay "actually" built Stromberg's Electro.
Weeb Dingle (talk) 18:53, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "first electric guitar"
Talk:Karnataka Milk Federation

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.kmfnandini.coop/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  TheGGoose (talk) 20:04, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Introduction 27.59.47.87 (talk) 02:32, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kmf mlik products
Talk:Karlovačko

message: Hello, the previous draft concentrated on the brewery and its history, rather than the beer. Luckily, the brewery, Karlovačka pivovara already has an entry, to which I transfered what seemed to be the salient points. That done, I added some sentences about the beer itself. Pisciotta11 (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Major re-edit 11/28/2008

message: I believe Karlovačko has 5.0% of alcohol, although they haven't updated their webpage. It must be a recent developement. I will check it next time I buy it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.198.212.70 (talk) 13:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alcohol percentage