lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Silverload

message: on the citation review it says that it was werewolves, but in the article it says vampires. which is it? ReverendG 00:23, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Black Flag Army

message: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/574068283724568561/
http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/soldiers-of-the-chinese-army-cochin-china-news-photo/3307906
http://www.asiafinest.com/forum/lofiversion/index.php/t75991.html
http://www.asiafinest.com/forum/lofiversion/index.php/t240120-200.html
Rajmaan (talk) 07:28, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

message: Does anybody know why "black flag" is red? Isn't supposed to be black? 
and what's the meaning of the chinese  script?
I think that the character is ling4 令, or "command, order, decree". But I have no idea why the flag is red. Maybe PHGCOM could help out, since they provided the original picture. Destar88 (talk) 20:41, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Color

message: Does that mean the Big Dipper?99.238.74.216 (talk) 03:29, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seven stars of the Great Bear
Talk:Bivalent

message: Doesn't "bivalent" also imply +2 valence? --James S. 16:17, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

message: I fixed some links to this disambiguation page. And noticed one more meanings for "bivalent", Bivalent (logic) that I am not qualified to describe. I "fixed" the links anyway, by changing the linkage in the articles to link to now-nonexistent articles. Was that correct? Pv2b 02:04, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bivalent logic
Talk:Time Commanders

message: Could the authors for this page provide some measure of reference and citation? Several unverfiable claims are made, not least of which is the game engine used within the programme itself. The BBC have a strict policy against product placement so the information has certainly not come from them. While widely claimed, this still needs a reference.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Playelf (talk • contribs) 14:59, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations please

message: Rome Total War is a combo of Real Time Tactical and Real Time Strategy, not just RTS. Vendettanine 16:22, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I must admit, that's not a category I'd heard of before.  The article on Real-time strategy indicates that the genre encompasses things down to and including the tactical level.  A quick web search turns up the Real-time tactics article as number 1, with some very rare game references in the rest of the list.  Is it a common category offline?  SimonFr 17:42, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  RTT is a genre shift away from the gathering and base building requirements of RTS, such as C&C, Warcraft, etc. A solid example of a RTT is Myth. Fcyoss 12:39, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: RTS misnomer

message: Links don't work, is this show still being produced or is it over? Fcyoss 12:39, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to be over. Shame. --Bonalaw 18:01, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad link

message: Is it ever going to be possible to see Time Commanders as I knew nothing about it until I saw the last 10 minutes of the last series in Jan. 2005. Please put it out on DVD. It never gets shown on Sky.82.24.159.190 20:22, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: DVD
Talk:Free-form language

message: Metion one would be hard-pressed to squeeze python into (long wrapped) one-liners as used in Makefiles.
: That's a style issue; you'd be surprised what you can do with lamba forms and list comprehensions. EdC 00:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Reduce the tab width? EdC 00:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Python big assumtions vs. accessiblity even 

message: Not sure it belongs here (and how to phrase it), but CSS uses whitespace both for delimiting tokens and for the descendent combinator:
 p a[href*=amazon] { text-decoration: underline }
refers to links that are descendants of paragraphs.
One reason this is interesting is because it has been a stumbling block when attempting to extend the syntax of CSS. The working group has been constrained when making some proposed changes because certain straightforward proposals would conflict with the descendant combinator.
I'm not sure it belongs simply because it's not a programming language. But the distinction seems irrelevant here. Free-formedness seems relevant to all generic computer languages (as opposed to specific data formats).—Leif Arne Storset 05:28, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  CSS whitespace combinator
Talk:Charlton Jimerson

message: In case the links go away, here's the print information for some of the online articles I used in this biography:
*"Older sister sacrifices for baseball dream" by Michael Corbo, in the June 8, 2001 edition of the St. Petersburg Times.
*"The book on Charlton Jimerson" by Kirk Kenney, in the June 25, 2001 edition of The Sporting News.
Hope this helps. -Colin Kimbrell 16:41, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think the fact that Jimerson's brother was formally assigned custody of him during his teenage years is sufficiently encyclopedic that it belongs in the article. It's a matter of public record, it's cited, and it was an important formative influence on him during his adolescence. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 13:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Custody info
Talk:BID 770

message: This is supremely unimportant, but did the BID 770 actually use "Double-Transistor logic". I don't think there's any such thing (you can use dual transistor devices, but it doesn't make "Double-Transistor logic"). I'd guess that it's likely to be DTL (diode-transistor logic), typoed in the original source. Pol098 16:46, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My typo, I'm afraid (it's definitely "Diode transistor logic" on the caption on the photograph once you zoom in enough). Fixed; thanks for spotting that! — Matt Crypto 16:59, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  DTL 

message: I was looking for the musician by the stage name of topic when I got redirected to this electronic equipment page. Please repair the link as I don't know how. Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.7.172.124 (talk) 11:16, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect issue
Talk:Armored catfish

message: Armoured catfish are not Loricariidae, but Loricariidae are armoured catfish. There are several types of armourd catfish including Corydoras (Callichthyid armored catfishes), Loricariidae (Suckermouth Armord catfish) and others.
:We're just following FishBase here. If they change, we'll change. It's worth cross-referencing other taxa that may also be called "armored catfish". Stan 19:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Above statement is right - this family is rarely called - the armoured catfish - it's more likely to refer to corydoras or Callichthys callichthys - I suggest changing the title to 'Armoured suckermouth catfish' which is free from confusion. Then 'armoured catfish' could be changed to a disambiguation page.HappyVR 20:51, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loricariidae 

message: I've added a disambiguation page for Armoured catfish, a new page under Loricariidae for 'suckermouth armoured catfish' and a redirect from this page to the disambiguation page.
Doesn't seem to be working at the moment.HappyVR 23:26, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: redirect and disambigify
Talk:Kill Billie Vol. 2

message: I would strongly hold off on deleting this page as the episode will first air in a few weeks. Once that happens it will be formatted will full credits, plot summary, trivia, etc. Artemisboy 16:48, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Kirk (disambiguation)

message: What is the point of this article?  Kirk is already a disambig article, though it has come to be a bit more too.  But there is no need for this. I suggest deletion.  --Doric Loon 16:56, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  Much as I like Sart Treck (ah, my childhood!), that really is a minor side branch of the complex of topics here. --Doric Loon 08:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Heart of Empire

message: I run the official Talbot fanpage at www.bryan-talbot.com; I added the entry about the CD-Rom of Heart of Empire because it is considered by fans and creators to be a significant work in it's own right.  It is currently used in Universities to teach the art of creating comics.
I do not want to make the entry in any way commercial and so there is no link to the page where the CD-Rom is for sale.
However, I can vouch for the quality of the info.
What is the best way to establish my credentials and prove that I am indeed a co-author of the CD-Rom and the person who runs the official fanpage?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.235.52 (talk) 16:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contribution from the official Bryan Talbot fanpage webmaster
Talk:The Adventures of Luther Arkwright

message: I've removed the Acclaim section. I was concerned with the neutrality of the overall article, and also with the fact that quotations must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation per WP:V. Hiding T  09:05, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense. An article on reception including reviews and the like is a good idea, something just listing quotes from famous folk has the whiff of a press release and can't be left in. (Emperor (talk) 13:11, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, fully agree. Hiding T  13:31, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acclaim section removed
Talk:Henry Hugh Peter Deasy

message: It can be demonstrated that a book was written by Henry Deasy on his travels in Tibet, because copies still exist. The comments on the importance of this person in the founding of Rools-Royce a plainly untrue. Rolls-Royce was found in May 1904, clearly pre-dating this. Henry Deasy serverd all links with the Deasy Motor Company in 1909 (before the arrival of Siddeley). The company that was taken forward by Siddeley and went through serveral merges, in the process becoming a highly respected motorcar & aircraft manufacture, before being bought by Rolls-Royce in 1965, by which time it was know as Bristol-Siddeley.
I have proposed the deletion for the following reasons. On further checking. It is clear that a person called Henry Deasy published a journal of his service time in Tibet. This on it's own does not appear to be notable enough to merit an enrty. The second claim, about Rolls-Royce,  is simply untrue. The third claim, being a cousin of Agnes mary Clerke, is unverified & I can find no reference to the family relationship, despite this women being well documented. The Pedant 15:28, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Beautiful Mistake

message: This was just a cut and paste job, from what I can see.
Someone needs to clean this up.
Pheonix91289 11:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Common metre

message: These two pages are about the same thing, but have different content. I think they should be merged. 207.245.124.66 17:17, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Common metre]] and [[Ballad Meter]] 

message: Am I mistaken, or should the article say "tetrameter" and "trimeter" instead of "tetrametre" and "trimetre"?
Rom maniac (talk) 13:38, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a related discussion going on at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 August 4#Category:Metre. Be aware also for WP:ENGVAR LazyStarryNights (talk) 20:29, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meter/metre 

message: The Examples section is flagged with a clean-up header, saying the section contains poorly defined embedded lists. Whoever placed it there is mistaken. The section contains examples of poetry, broken into clearly defined and identifiable stanzas. I'll give other editors a chance to review the section, after which time, if no one else has, I will take it upon myself to remove the erroneous and unnecessary—and misleading—notice. rowley (talk) 07:37, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Clean-Up Needed
Talk:Sanya

message: Two of the images refer to the "left" and "right" of Sanya.  There is nothing in the article that indicates what "left and right" are supposed to mean in this context.  Left from some point on land, right from some point on land?  Left when approaching from the sea, right when approaching from the sea?  East, west?  West, east?  Tomertalk 03:39, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Caption question

message: This article gets almost twice the visits of the Haikou article but is relatively undeveloped. Please, if you like, in point form, identify a few sections/subsections below that the article should have, or need fixing or expanding. I will sign beside the ones I can work on. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:35, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion needed 

message: Located in Sanya Bay and under construction. Anyone have a snapshot? Many thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:40, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Phoenix Island]] - Photo request
Talk:New York State Route 218

message: Is 218 the old (pre-bypass) route of 9W? Looks like it might have been. Anyone know? Daniel Case 17:25, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks that way based on maps. US 9W was routed off modern 218 and onto a bypass of Highland Falls and Cornwall-on-Hudson between 1938 and 1942, and its former routing became 218. – TMF 05:13, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Former designations
Talk:Baltimore Symphony Orchestra

message: The link from Howard Barlow directs to a different Howard Barlow, not a music conductor.  GHankStewartGhankstewart (talk) 13:37, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the current section on marin alsop's appointment ("becoming the first woman in history to lead a major American orchestra" ... "At first, this created controversy") seems to say that "becoming the first woman" is the antecedent 
of "this", and that the orchestra members objected because she was a woman.  see whether my version seems any better.
Jeffcovey 16:52, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  controversy over marin alsop's appointment 

message: the statements re marin alsop and joann faletta are obviously contradictory. one of them has to go.Toyokuni3 (talk) 02:47, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Alsop v. Faletta

message: The infobox for the orchestra is, in my view, just about completely useless. "Associated acts"? What on earth would they be for an orchestra? And are the only musicians in the orchestra those listed here? Of course not. That template was designed for pop performers; the consensus at the classical music project here in WP-land has been to remove these boxes. I will do so unless there is a huge outcry within the next day or two. --Wspencer11 (talk to me...) 23:15, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox? 

message: Curious why the article refers to it by the shortened name "Baltimore SO" rather than "BSO." I've never heard anyone say Baltimore SO -- we call it the BSO! Can we change that? Edit: aha, I see it's so it doesn't get confused with other orchestras that go by BSO. Makes sense, just strange to see it called something I've never heard anyone call it haha 69.138.93.66 (talk) 02:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Baltimore SO"
Talk:St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge

message: i think its irrelevant and has nothing to do with describing St. marks 
Ducklan (talk) 18:54, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  website 

message: This article isn’t promotional. DoggyGeneral (talk) 16:44, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I'm having trouble finding what language is promotional -- I would be in favor of a removal of the template. DuckWrangler97 (talk) 22:26, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article is fine
Talk:Cantonment

message: There were also Cantonments in South Africa - HARRISMITH, MIDDELBURG, POTCHEFSTROOM, PRETORIA and STANDERTON all appear on early postcards.
Daventryman 08:43, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Wouldn't it be better to split these lists (say Cantonments of India ) into a separate page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.15.145.204 (talk) 11:40, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article contains excessively long lists
Talk:Bharatendu Harishchandra

message: The original image :File:Bharatendu Harishchandra (1850-1885).jpg, of Bharatendu Harishchandra issued by Govt. of India, has been replaced in the info box, by a painting reproduction of the same original :File:Bharatendu Harishchandra.JPG which doesn't look like the original! --Ekabhishektalk 14:17, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox image

message: have you read the book of vashudha dalmia on the topic if not then go and read .  was birbal and tansan also gems not human come on grow up obliviously he was a human . i have the book but in physical form and in Hindi and as you are being so sure kindly tell how many books you have read on the topicGaurav 3894 (talk) 11:54, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please grow up 

message: Bharatendu Harishchandra 223.188.132.69 (talk) 10:25, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bharatendu Harishchandra
Talk:Graeco-Armenian

message: If it's not widely accepted, shouldnt there be some criticism cited in the article?
:'not widely accepted' is pretty much the default status of these superfamily hypotheses. It doesn't mean that there is dedicated opposition to the idea so much as that your typical linguist will take a position of 'yeah, maybe, who can tell? not impossible, but not positively likely either'. dab (ᛏ) 06:51, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to me that Thraco-Illyrian branch could possibly also be related to this group but as per above, no point in hypothetising something that can't be proven. The dialect continuums have most likely been the primary relations between languages in early times, the national languages are a relatively recent addition in the way people use their languages. Dreg743 (talk) 06:11, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  umm ...

message: One piece of evidence that clearly shows how so many of the similarities invoked to justify "Graeco-Armenian" are probably just areal features is the PIE *s_ -> *h_ isoglosse, that not only encompasses Hellenic and Armenian, but also Iranian, which is obviously not related to the other two subgoups. Opinions may vary as to where this common sound change originated, but it is obviously a late feature, as can be seen from the fact that the early attested Anatolian languages, that stood just in the middle of the isogloss area, were apparently unaffected by that change.201.21.200.15 19:30, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Areal Feature 

message: The common words added by the anon seem to me more like direct loanwords from Greek as opposed to actual congnates.-- Ευπάτωρ Talk!! 14:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ocean certainly is.--Domitius 15:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common words 

message: or bustμηδείς (talk) 07:00, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Isoglosses

message: The refs "G. Neumann, G. Klingenschmitt, J. Matzinger, J. H. Holst", added presumably by J.H. Holst anonymously,  are - against all wiki rules incomplete and thus not testable. If this is not completed in considerable time, the entries must be deleted. HJJHolm (talk) 08:34, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs in "History"
Talk:Of Thee I Sing

message: This says that the musical has never been filmed, and in the same sentence says that there was a television version produced. This seems to be self contradictory. I don't know the facts of the situation well enough to feel confident making an edit, but would like to see this cleaned up if someone with more expertise should pop by.Samuelrutledge 05:48, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Film/TV

message: George Gershwin might very well be America's finest composer. But such a judgement is debatable, and to state it as fact is hardly POV-neutral.
WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 16:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  America's Finest Composer?
Talk:Preston Gates & Ellis

message: I have removed the unsigned additions added by the user above.  None of the user's statements were correctly sourced.  None of the sources provided by the user above discussed Preston Gates & Ellis' connection to the Abramoff scandal, which appears to involve lobbying at Greenberg Traurig.  In addition, the user has attempted to link unrelated events (such as Seattle Weekly's turnover) to Preston's former lobbying.  These allegations appear to be unfounded, and not supported by the source material.  Likewise, the allegations that Abramoff stole trade secrets from Preston Gates & Ellis are not supported by any source material.  As KWH discussed, these edits appear to be an attempt to draw conclusions from false correlations. CopaceticYawp (talk) 22:24, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reply to response 

message: Everything in this section needs a reference, since it currently appears to be almost entirely unsourced propaganda. Anything that can't be sourced will be removed per NPOV. Thanks, Cumulus Clouds (talk) 18:42, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Abramoff

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:49, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 
Talk:PowerBook 5300

message: The PowerBook 3400 series introduced in the February of 1997 had a slot that could use modules built for the 5300, but apart from DMA and slightly faster processors it still had few new features. That makes the PowerBook 5300 an example for the damage introduction problems can do to the reputation of a remarkable product (and of the whole company), even long after they have been resolved
While I agree with the conclusion, I think saying that the 3400 was merely a slightly tweaked version of the 3400 is a bit of an understatement. The 3400 had, among other things:
* CD drive
* PCI architecture
* 64-bit wide internal bus
* Accelerated graphics
* Built-in Ethernet
* Li-Ion battery
* Four loudspeakers
* A better, higher-resolution screen
So even if superficially they look quite alike, under the skin they are very different machines. It's perhaps better to say that the 3400 is the machine the 5300 should have been, and perhaps would have been, had the technology been slightly more mature and the time of manufacture.
Cheers, Neale Neale Monks 23:23, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  5300 vs. 3400 in the '''Problems''' section