Talk:List of Camp Lazlo characters/Archive 1

message: The whole thing looks like it was thrown together by a 2nd grader in 5 minutes. Someone should really clean this up. Wizrdwarts 22:27, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs cleanup 

message: Took out this notice at the bottom - that's what talk pages are for.
=== To The Person Who Was Editing This Article ===
Mainly not all of them.  But to this person, learn how to spell and punctuate correctly.  It is very irritating to the other 
editors and readers when they have to fix your mistakes.  Please read the whole article before editing it.
Also, I took out a bunch of references to erotic fanfiction, that does not belong here at all. Craig Sniffen 17:24, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Junk 

message: Why are some Wikipedians changing the names of the campers and are some of the names true? Squirepants101 21:04, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey. Can you add screen caps of all the Acorn Flats scouts? Joanna, 14 September 2006, 21:33 (UTC)
Sorry, I can't get any screenshots because I don't have a camera. Squirepants101 21:01, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Campers' Names 

message: I think some of this is starting to look like cruft, like "she hates Norman." Come on, the Squirrel Scouts don't appear in a lot of episodes. Squirepants101 16:58, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Squirepants101. Which names have the grey squirrel, the purple mouse and the light green tapir from Acorn Flats?
Well, actually, the characters have no name and not mentioned. So it's unknown.--esanchez, Camp Lazlo fan! 23:21, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cruft? 

message: According to Lazlo Loves a Parade (could be seen online), Toodie is a squirrel, but this article claims that she's a rabbit. Squirepants101 20:52, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, which name has the purple poodle? Joanna
Hey! Is there true, that a poodle's name is Misty and a tapir's name's Sue? Joanna
Why are you adding those characters if you don't know if they're real or not? This isn't a fansite. Squirepants101 15:40, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toodie? 

message: Why can't I get to the Bill the aardvark article i made? Is Bill really a aardvark? What happen to the article about Bill? 
Bill was made article by me.-User:Kongsaurus12
Was Bill's article deleted or not?
I don't understand what happen to the article Bill (Camp Lazlo)
I redirected it because I thought it was unneccessary. He's just a minor character, he doesn't need an article. Squirepants101 22:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill 

message: I've noticed that this article has been protected, so lets discuss our disputes. I've noticed that some users have been creating unnecessary articles (even a copy of this page which I redirected). I do not think they're neccessary because all that info can fit right here. I've also seen users adding fake info to the Squirrel Scouts, like fake voice actors. Any comments? Squirepants101 23:01, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've unprotected this article, please bring up disputed items here on the talk page. — xaosflux Talk 23:09, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected 

message: ===List of characters in Camp Lazlo===
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and may or may not be accurate for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at WP:LEAD. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.See footnote
*Consider adding more links to the article; per WP:MOS-L and WP:BTW, create links to relevant articles.
*Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSDATE, months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
*Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) maybe too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per WP:SS.See footnote
*There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.  See footnote 
*Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
**While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 34 additive terms, a bit too much.
**Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant -  “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a. See footnote
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Squirepants101 21:39, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review 

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and may or may not be accurate for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at WP:LEAD. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.See footnote
*Consider adding more links to the article; per WP:MOS-L and WP:BTW, create links to relevant articles.
*Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSDATE, months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
*Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) maybe too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per WP:SS.See footnote
*There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.  See footnote 
*Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
**While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 34 additive terms, a bit too much.
**Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant -  “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a. See footnote
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Squirepants101 21:39, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[List of characters in Camp Lazlo]]

message: I remember that a long time ago, I was able to tell the Squirrel Scouts. Now, in Wiki here, it got me confused but for sure, the info on Susie is completely incorrect!! I can't remember who was Susie but it wasn't that character mentioned already! I think it was the dog...someone help! Any episode, check the credits! Mianly maybe on Dosey Doe... --esanchez, Camp Lazlo fan! 01:59, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused... 

message: Today, I redirected another page about a minor camper and it was Honey. She had her own article under a different name and I redirected it here, but the person who created that article created another article about Honey. I redirected that one. Why are users creating these kinds of articles anyways when all that information can go right here? Especially when they are only a few sentences long. This article isn't even 30 kilobytes (it used to be big until someone removed all the minor characters, not campers. I created an article for those minor characters). Squirepants101 00:06, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected another page 

message: Can I create a lot of articles about other Camp Lazlo characters? Joanna
like who?67.175.138.202 03:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New articles about other Camp Lazlo characters 

message: There are ten female campers from Acorn Flats:
*Patsy 
*Nina 
*Gretchen
*Honey
*Amber
*Toodie
*Terrifield
*Almondine
*Suzie
*Misty
In reality, I don't think that's a correct list. I mean, "Terrefield", "Suzie", & "Misty". I don't think they're mentioned (except Susie, but I think the article mentions it to the wrong character. I'll take a look at an episode to confirm it) --esanchez, Camp Lazlo fan! 06:44, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of the Squirrel Scouts 

message: I know! Three Bean Scouts' names are: David (the muskrat), Kickpatrick (the cat) and Joey (the toucan). Joanna —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yoko7890 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Camper's Names 

message: *One epsiode of "Camp Lazlo" Slinkman reports to Lumpus that there are 14 Bean scouts. However there are 24 named Bean Scouts on article page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 134.53.145.90 (talk) 01:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably a writer's error. Black Kat 19:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Bean Scouts? 

message: Some of the images of the characters are sideways what is up with that.Bladez636
:The person who got the pictures didn't do a well job. --esanchez, Camp Lazlo fan! 23:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: I'm curious, I don't think the extra links to the other characters (mostly the "other Squirrel Scouts"). They don't have much importance and the info doesn't provide enough info to have an article of their own. I don't think we need thos extra articles. --esanchez, Camp Lazlo fan! 23:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  We don't need them 

message: This article was tagged a year ago because it was "chock-full of vandalism" and that it was "thrown together by a 2nd grader in 5 minutes" (The page in March 2006). I think it's been improved a lot since then (The page half a year later), but I have some concerns for this article: This article has gone through a lot of change since January 2007, but much of the change has ocurred in March, coincidentally a year after the article was tagged for cleanup. I'm not sure whether this major change is beneficial to the article or not (the change was not discussed on Talk:List of characters in Camp Lazlo), but I am sure that there are too many daughter articles because even some of the minor characters are starting to have them. Most of the articles are stubs and some of them feel fancrufty to me. Is there anything I could to do improve the article? That is what I was going to put on WP:RFF, but I realized that I needed to make a major edit onto this article. Another concern I have for the article is the names of the campers. Some users have been making unverifiable changes to the names (examples: ). The worst part of that is that many of the editors who do this don't provide where they get the names from in the edit summary (there are other uses for the edit summary, which include asking the question, "Why did you make this edit?").  Much of this article and some of its daughter articles are written in an in-universe style. The images don't have fair use rationales. The references have been removed. By the way, here's an updated peer review:
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.  See footnote 
*Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
**While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 21 additive terms, a bit too much.
**Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant -  “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.See footnote
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, 
Please share your suggestions on how to improve the article. Squirepants101 20:28, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I can see some of the concerns. There are too many main articles being made, especially since there isn't much info about many of the characters. Before, the article was very lengthy, between having two articles for some of the characters, and that the list went forever. I only moved the ones that had main articles, mainly for the usual characters. The smaller ones, like the once in awhile characters, don't seem to need a main article. I would say the very minor characters should have their own area on this page, with just small info, or maybe not even have them at all. They're so minor, articles might not even be needed. Black Kat 14:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of the clean-up tag? / Some concerns 

message: I found the pics with other Squirrel Scouts and send them to Wikipedia, but you've deleted these pics from the article List of characters in Camp Lazlo. Please, let them be in this article. yoko4567890
The pics can't be as big! yoko4567890
:If you want your pictures to be approved, they can't be upside down. Also you have to upload pictures that look good, and don't take pictures directly from the TV with your camera. Try searching for images on Google. Besides, the pictures are not too big. On Wikipedia we basically use the thumb parametre, not e.g. 150px. The Prince of Darkness 10:46, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pics with other Squirrel Scouts 

message: What was that sport played by the Squirrel Scouts? It is mentioned in Love Sick and Lazlo Loves a Parade. I sort of know how its pronouced but I don't know how it's spelled.61.9.126.41 22:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game of the Squirrels 

message: For some period in the article, the three from the Other Squirrel Scouts section have been named liked this. Suzie is the poodle, Terrifield is the tapir and Rachel is the gopher. Where do these names come from? I've seen just about all the episodes and these weren't addressed or mentioned. The name Suzie was mentioned in Dosey Doe but it was never directed to a particular character. Anyway, the names of these Squirrel Scouts have been confirmed;
*Patsy-the mongoose
*Nina-the giraffe
*Gretchen-the alligator
*Amber-the rabbit
*Honey-the bear
*Almondine-the owl
*Toodie-the squirrel
When adding a name to the scouts, please include a scource so that they can be confirmed.61.9.126.41 08:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The poodle, the tapir and the gopher scouts 

message: Because the names of these characters (the poodle, tapir and gopher) have never been revealed, they should perhaps remained as unnamed. Please don't assume or make up names. Things like that can be very misleading. If you think you know what the names of these characters are really, please include a scource or write was episode mentioned. That way, they can be accepted. Thank you. 61.9.126.41 03:40, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnamed Squirrel Scouts 

message: I just wanted to know who is kirkpatrick my friend and I have been arguing about who he is I for one think people are mistaking him for samson just with a lighter color if anyone has a true picture about his appearance please reply Youknowme(youdon'tknowme) 22:50, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kirkpatrick 

message: Does anyone know what french phrase Clam said in Squirrel Seats, when asked by Raj "Why does Patsy want to sit by Lazlo anyway"?Noahcs 02:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can only pick out two words: "love" and "two" Yngvarr 00:43, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  French phrase 

message: Um, what happened to all of the minor scouts-"Wilbert" the beaver, Chuck/Ted the pig, etc. Fred/Harold and the Lemmings are on the characters page already, as well as recurring scouts-Dave and Ping-Pong, Chip and Skip, etc. But I still think that the minor scouts should be there, too.
Also, Squirrel Scouts need pictures.
:: The "minor" scouts really offer no notable role in the series. Their dialog is limited to a very few sentences, and their interaction with the rest of the characters such that it is probably better to class them as "props". At best, their descriptions contained phrase after phrase of "he appeared in the episode..."
:: If you feel they still need mention, it would be better to put them on the List of minor characters in Camp Lazlo, but I don't agree with that... Yngvarr 13:38, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've uploaded a couple of the Squirrel Scout pictures; I'll see if I can get more. So far the quality seems Ok, considering it's actually a camera shot of paused video! Yngvarr 17:28, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor scouts 

message: Why does the table of contents not list the indivual campers. It did this once, but someone put  on the page. Should this be removed? (Noahcs)
: I'm not sure who or when removed the table of contents; I personally the TOCRight, because the original table of contents was filling an entire screen and a half with TOC, just too much for the subject, so I put the TOC on the right, to flow with the text. Whoever did it, I actually like it without the individual campers, considering that quite a bit of their text descriptions was "she appeared in..." or "she sneezed in one episode". It can probably be moved, or just taken out, so the TOC is at the top like it should be. If you disagree, maybe the three major-majors (the three Jellies and the three Squirrels) could use their own sub. Yngvarr 17:34, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Noahcs (or it should be changed to ) because I feel the pages are legible in case of TOC on top/left. BTW,  was added by The Prince of Darkness on May 8, 2007.--Mujaki 10:35, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I added the |limit=2 section but I'd be alright with using  if it doesn't affect flow as it did before. --treelo talk 12:28, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table of Contents 

message: Nina can also be found in My Gym Partner's a Monkey, another show. However, her neck is much longer. Plus she wears a purple sweater and jeans instead of a Squirrel Scout uniform. One time, a horse tried to take over her life but she struck back after being harassed so much. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.4.116.112 (talk • contribs) 09:40, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that's a completely different character, named Ingrid. Just because two cartoons have female giraffe characters, it doesn't mean they're meant to be the same. Lucky number 49 17:16, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nina Neckerly 

message: Is Chef McMuesli's nickname "Wheatgrass Willie"?.User:Kongsaurus12.
Probably not, they never said it.
:: Actually, Lumpus calls McMuesli "Wheatgrass Willie" in the "Beans and Weenies" episode, but I don't think that's remarkable. Lumpus has a habit of making up adjectival names for people (Officer Donught), and would rather hear the name again before considering it reliable. Yngvarr 11:44, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chef McMuesli 

message: I changed the section name to Chuck/Ted a while ago, but someone apparently changed it back. So - should we mention that he was called Chuck in the pantsing episode (forgot what it was called) but Ted in the episode where Lumpus gives them name tags? Seritinajii 01:01, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chuck/Ted? 

message: A few minutes ago, I just watched Seven Deadly Sandwiches. I spotted some scout with glasses, and he looked furry and brown. He was sitting next to Mort (the pelican) and in front of him were Fred, Gordon, and Milt. Does anyone know who this is, or at least what? Seritinajii 15:00, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have most of the episodes still on my DVR, I'll scan thru later and see. Check the section for Unnamed Scouts, the second one listed is a glasses-wearing scout. Would he match what you saw? Tho, to be honest, I wouldn't pay it much attention. If you remember the scene in "Hold It, Lazlo!" when Lazlo got in line to use the latrines, and there were at least 50 scouts in line ahead of him, even tho the camp doesn't have that many. Yngvarr 15:12, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unknown Guy 

message: Is Chef McMuesli's nickname "Wheatgrass Willie"?.User:Kongsaurus12.
Probably not, they never said it.
:: Actually, Lumpus calls McMuesli "Wheatgrass Willie" in the "Beans and Weenies" episode, but I don't think that's remarkable. Lumpus has a habit of making up adjectival names for people (Officer Donught), and would rather hear the name again before considering it reliable. Yngvarr 11:44, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chef McMuesli 

message: Um, what happened to all of the minor scouts-"Wilbert" the beaver, Chuck/Ted the pig, etc. Fred/Harold and the Lemmings are on the characters page already, as well as recurring scouts-Dave and Ping-Pong, Chip and Skip, etc. But I still think that the minor scouts should be there, too.
Also, Squirrel Scouts need pictures.
:: The "minor" scouts really offer no notable role in the series. Their dialog is limited to a very few sentences, and their interaction with the rest of the characters such that it is probably better to class them as "props". At best, their descriptions contained phrase after phrase of "he appeared in the episode..."
:: If you feel they still need mention, it would be better to put them on the List of minor characters in Camp Lazlo, but I don't agree with that... Yngvarr 13:38, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've uploaded a couple of the Squirrel Scout pictures; I'll see if I can get more. So far the quality seems Ok, considering it's actually a camera shot of paused video! Yngvarr 17:28, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor scouts 

message: Why does the table of contents not list the indivual campers. It did this once, but someone put  on the page. Should this be removed? (Noahcs)
: I'm not sure who or when removed the table of contents; I personally the TOCRight, because the original table of contents was filling an entire screen and a half with TOC, just too much for the subject, so I put the TOC on the right, to flow with the text. Whoever did it, I actually like it without the individual campers, considering that quite a bit of their text descriptions was "she appeared in..." or "she sneezed in one episode". It can probably be moved, or just taken out, so the TOC is at the top like it should be. If you disagree, maybe the three major-majors (the three Jellies and the three Squirrels) could use their own sub. Yngvarr 17:34, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Noahcs (or it should be changed to ) because I feel the pages are legible in case of TOC on top/left. BTW,  was added by The Prince of Darkness on May 8, 2007.--Mujaki 10:35, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I added the |limit=2 section but I'd be alright with using  if it doesn't affect flow as it did before. --treelo talk 12:28, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table of Contents 

message: Nina can also be found in My Gym Partner's a Monkey, another show. However, her neck is much longer. Plus she wears a purple sweater and jeans instead of a Squirrel Scout uniform. One time, a horse tried to take over her life but she struck back after being harassed so much. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.4.116.112 (talk • contribs) 09:40, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that's a completely different character, named Ingrid. Just because two cartoons have female giraffe characters, it doesn't mean they're meant to be the same. Lucky number 49 17:16, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nina Neckerly 

message: I changed the section name to Chuck/Ted a while ago, but someone apparently changed it back. So - should we mention that he was called Chuck in the pantsing episode (forgot what it was called) but Ted in the episode where Lumpus gives them name tags? Seritinajii 01:01, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chuck/Ted? 

message: A few minutes ago, I just watched Seven Deadly Sandwiches. I spotted some scout with glasses, and he looked furry and brown. He was sitting next to Mort (the pelican) and in front of him were Fred, Gordon, and Milt. Does anyone know who this is, or at least what? Seritinajii 15:00, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have most of the episodes still on my DVR, I'll scan thru later and see. Check the section for Unnamed Scouts, the second one listed is a glasses-wearing scout. Would he match what you saw? Tho, to be honest, I wouldn't pay it much attention. If you remember the scene in "Hold It, Lazlo!" when Lazlo got in line to use the latrines, and there were at least 50 scouts in line ahead of him, even tho the camp doesn't have that many. Yngvarr 15:12, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unknown Guy 

message: :Image:Mucus.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:34, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use rationale for Image:Mucus.JPG 

message: :Image:Mucus.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use rationale for Image:Mucus.JPG 

message: Stop deleting infos about other Squirrel Scout which I wrote yesterday. Let them be in this article, please! PPG2007, 12 sep 2007, 18:38 (UTC)
: There's no purpose to describing what color hair they have, or what color their outfits are. For that matter, since they're scouts, all their outfits are basically the same. This isn't a fan-site, where you can list every single detail in painful discourse, there are a number of policies and guidelines to conform with. This talk page, and the archive, are full of discussions as to why these things aren't necessary. I'd recommend you read them, and read the archives. I'd also recommend you read some of the other well-written cartoon shows, to get an idea what is considered notable. 
Here is an example of what you just added: "When the wagon with Lazlo and Lamare fell down into Mess Hall, she is eating beetween gopher scout and beaver scout". This is for Honey. Can you really justify that addition? Does it add any encyclopedic information about the character? Yngvarr 16:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok, you obviously misunderstood my question. That was not a "yes or no" question, I am asking you to explicitly state your justification. Yngvarr 01:09, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've give a reasonable amount of time for you to reply to my query, and I see from your editing history, you're active as of less than an hour ago. As courtesy, I'll wait one more day, but unless a reasonable justification can be posted as to why things like "she participated in tug-o-war" is considered notable (especially since every character participated in that tug-o-war, I'm going to delete them. Yngvarr (t) (c) 17:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The article is now under full-protection, which means no one can edit it until this disput is resolved. I've taken as many steps as I could to open discussion with PPG2007, who appears to have turned to IP editing to add the disputed material, and so far, no response has been forthcoming. I'd rather not have resorted to full-protection, but given the edit history for the past 24 hours, it was the only resort. And yes, I'm just as guilty in participating in the edit war, so let's just get this resolved. Yngvarr (t) (c) 03:17, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not delete infomations about other Squirrel Scout 

message: :Image:Commander Hoohaw.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:29, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use rationale for Image:Commander Hoohaw.PNG 

message: Today I'm not allowed to edit informations about Other Squirrel Scouts because you blocked me. Please let me add more informations about them. PPG2007, 16 sep 2007, 16:46 (UTC)
: No. The page is under full protection, which means nobody can edit it. I've requested, and was granted, full protection based on the current edit war. If you would take the time to read this talk page, and to read your own user talk page, you would see what I am discussing. You're adding information which I consider disputed, and you've ignored all my requests to discuss these additions, and until such discussion is in progress, I suspect that the page will remain protected. Again, see my postings in your original request above as to why:
* These "minor squirrel scounts" are listed as having two voice actors. Such information is indicative that these are non-notable characters. Otherwise they would have dedicated voice actors. If they are not important enough to have dedicated voice actors, why would they be considered important enough otherwise? If they're not notable outside of their minor roles, why would they be considered notable in-universe? Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction)#Real world perspective
There are other reasons, which I've pointed out above. So now the ball is in your court to rationalize what I (and others) have considered non-notable material. The talk page, and archives, show concensus regarding the "minor squirrel scouts", which you've negated. And in case someone throws WP:COI, conflict of interest at me, see the talk archives for discussions before I got involved, showing (to me) what appears to be consensus. Yngvarr (t) (c) 15:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  As I said several times: when you are willing to discuss these issues. Yngvarr (t) (c) 16:51, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let me edit! 

message: Is this article fully protected? It seems though this page can only be edited by administrators. FoxLad 06:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's usually what being fully protected means. --treelo talk 09:23, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fully proctected? 

message: :Image:Gretchen.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:54, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use rationale for Image:Gretchen.jpg 

message: :Image:Lazlo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:16, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use rationale for Image:Lazlo.png 

message: :Image:Leslie.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 14:24, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use rationale for Image:Leslie.JPG 

message: As I read in the article, I noticed in the Minor Bean Scout section a cat named Kirkpatrick. Is that true? If it is, then someone should tell what episode what that revealed. If it isn't, then it should be removed. FoxLad 13:22, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, there are various characters that aren't named. And "Kirkpatrick" is not a character in the show. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 22:09, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kirkpatrick? 

message: Once this page gets unprotected, do you think it would be a good idea to move the main characters (Lazlo, Raq, Clam, Lumpus, etc.) to individual character pages to save room. Similar to how the Foster's Home For Imaginary Friends characters page is set up. Please discuss. Noahcs 02:10, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. That's been attempted before and were either speedy deleted or redirected, it'll happen again. If length is an issue, take out some more minor characters and put them into the cruftpile. Also, FHIF has a much larger array and better developed main characters so can make it past notability guidelines and have articles of decent length, Camp Lazlo cannot. --treelo talk 11:43, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see your point. Noahcs 02:43, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character pages? 

message: Where did all the images go? 
Where did a  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.100.184.214 (talk) 13:12, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images? 

message: How do I add more references to the reference section? Seri 12:42, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: what happened to the pictures of the characters? Colinstu 21:46, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They were deleted. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 22:29, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

text: This question has already been answered. The Prince 18:05, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

text: They do but you can argue that out with User:Betacommand who has said that the images are pretty much not to be used. --treelo talk 02:36, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

text: They were not removed because of their rationales. βcommand 01:22, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  If I upload new images with proper rational, will that address the concern? Yngvarr 12:44, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Rationales don't seem to be the issue but copyvios and only specific to Camp Lazlo. Of course, there's no free alternates we can use, there's a need for images and it's very odd not to allow their fair use which this does qualify as. Personally, I'd like better reasoning than simply that they're copyvios because even though they are technically copyvios it's still very glib to remove them with no forewarning or explaination as to why. -treelo talk 14:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

text: NFC is not allowed in lists. βcommand 14:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I'll accept that as a reason but not explaining that at anytime until someone actually prods you on the situation doesn't help the confusion that arises from removing images without any reasoning beyond "copyvio, don't revert this edit". --treelo talk 14:18, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Same thing here. I went away for two weeks, and when I came back today, the images were gone, but there was no real explanation. The edit history summaries don't really say much other than "don't" and this caused me a little bit of concern, which is what prompted my original query a little while ago (above) Yngvarr 14:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Hold On. If non-free images are not allowed in lists, how is it that the List of Avatar: The Last Airbender secondary recurring characters pages contains non-free images as well as the page? Noahcs 23:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Betacommand, why are you taking this so-called non-free thing very seriously? If we can't apply images of those kind, how can we put something that could do? Besides, it's not that we're stealing those pics, we're just borrowing them. Also, we add images not for financial gain but to show readers how something may look. This is a lot promoting someone's work which is something the owners should be thankful. Duke17 13:00, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: its Policy, If you want to add a picture get a group photo. As for The Avatar page there are no images there. βcommand 13:28, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I understand the policy in place (WP:NFC#8, which is applied to WP:NFC#Unacceptable images), but I am curious as to why a group photo would supersede this policy? The policy sounds sweeping, which would preclude group shots as well as individual images. Yngvarr 13:35, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  pictures 

message: I think the  template needs to majorly updated. It just seems too simple. I've worked up something a little more complex here. What do you think? --  Noah¢s  Talk / Contribs 21:28, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template Cleanup 

message: :Image:CL-Lazlo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:52, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use rationale for Image:CL-Lazlo.jpg 

message: WHAT EVER VANDEL HAS PUT THE NAME FRED NEXT TO HAROLD IS NOT WHAT I HERD! he tells raj that his real name is not harold but he never said fred THE ONLY FRED STILL LIVING IS FREDFREDBURGER  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Godzillastar (talk • contribs) 00:17, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The two cartoons are unrelated. It's unreasonable to say there is only one Fred. However, the names Fred and Harold are disputed, since they've each been mentioned on the show. Yngvarr 01:14, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

text: It's confusing between the two, so I can see how they messed up. They may have watched the episiode but may have not payed attention or heard what Harold said. Loolylolly1997 (talk) 01:27, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  HAROLD IS NOT FRED 

message: :Image:CL-Patsy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:54, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use rationale for Image:CL-Patsy.jpg 

message: Okay, the press release said that his given name is Leonard.
Now, some people have said his given name is Algonquin - I do not watch this show, so I do not know what episode this is from. Anyhow, if someone knows what episode "Algonquin" is from, he or she is welcome to cite it. WhisperToMe (talk) 22:46, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: He's been called Algonquin in a few by Slinkman usually and on other occaisons by Jane Doe and Commander Hoo-Haw but he's never been referred to as Leonard at any point. --treelo talk 23:51, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yea, he's been called "Algonquin C Lumpus" by several people, even himself. I think I'd put that in the text, but mention something about the Leonard thing. Yngvarr 00:12, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lumpus's given (first) name 

message: Lumpus' description says that at the end of the series, he marries Jane. It also says that he has the real Scoutmaster locked up. I've heard that these were episode plots that were at least considered, but do we know that they're actually going to happen? Because as far as I know, no episode with any mention of these has been aired. --Alice2 (talk) 02:10, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Check the reference provided for that statement. Joe Murray has a website which he's been updating. The description is for the series-ender episode, but there's no indication when (or even if) that'll air. There were 61 episodes produced, but at a quick glance, so far 59 have aired. Yngvarr 10:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I totally missed the reference. Sorry about that. --Alice2 (talk) 17:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lumpus' description 

message: There are signs that we should split the Clam and Raj articles, so, are we doing it or not. Because I'll do it if we're going to do it. I'm watchin' you,mon (talk) 22:12, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw the suggestion, but I've refrained from discussing it until now. The reason why Lazlo (Camp Lazlo) was forked is that there is a lot of external information available: character development, personality, reviews, and so forth. Unless the same kind of information can be found for Raj and Clam, I don't think any fork would survive. And to be honest, I don't really think that much information can be found. If a fork were created without sources to back it, it would likely be deleted or redirected. Lazlo, as the title (and main) character of the show, has significant character development compared with rest. Check the Lazlo article to see what would be required. I'd also not be surprised if someone challenged the Lazlo fork, either, but as I said, there's enough behind him to justify. Yngvarr 22:19, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character Pages 

message: The scoutmaster's last name isn't "Lumpus". It is clearly said by "Lumpus" himself that his last name is Lupus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.247.23.25 (talk) 17:22, February 3, 2008
: Um, no. That's called original research. You'll need to find another source for that information, as the primary sources (which, are also verifiable), says otherwise: , the CN press release;  Joe Murray's descriptions; and  the Lazlo website on CN. Yngvarr 00:01, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Oh, I also forgot to add: Episode 45, Lumpus vs. the Volcano. Not trying to be harsh, but the data is pretty conclusive. Yngvarr 13:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scoutmaster "Lumpus" 

message: On the episode 'Seven Deadly Sandwiches' Jane seemed to think he was Lumpus' pet and could never remember his name. But on the episode 'Step Clam' they acted like they had been friends since they were children. Jane even tried to pass Slinkman off as her little brother when she was a Squirrel Scout. Should this be noted? --Alice2 (talk) 04:23, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, I went ahead and mentioned it, but it's just one short sentence. --Alice2 (talk) 23:08, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jane and Slinkman 

message: *In Lumpus Big Cheese epsiode he calls a State Policeman "Deputy Donunt"
*Patsy Smiles knocked out the Entire Bean Scout Troop with a southpaw punchs  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.53.145.112 (talk) 19:00, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triva 

message: *Who can forget Highway Patrolman "Officer Donnut" in Lumpus Chesse epsiode?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.53.145.213 (talk) 12:55, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  /One Time only/Minor charathers 

message: speedy closed, no reason given for name change. --Sable232 (talk) 22:06, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Because it was getting too difficult to read with all of the paragraphs about Lazlo, Clam, and Raj.
In-Correct (talk) 18:47, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This kind of bolding is against Wikipedia's guidelines on bolding and should be removed. Neelix (talk) 03:51, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Added Bold''' 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on List of Camp Lazlo characters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://turnerinfo.turner.com/presskititem.aspx?P=CARTOON&CID01=98376fcf-3e6c-44a0-aae0-9e41e16079ef&CID02=a97e4cd3-7a0b-4b0c-b126-1a03a9c9ca06Q&A
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080914140756/http://joemurraystudio.com/blog/?page_id=346 to http://joemurraystudio.com/blog/?page_id=346
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110306063558/http://www.joemurraystudio.com/tv/camp_lazlo.shtml to http://www.joemurraystudio.com/tv/camp_lazlo.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080315074923/http://joemurraystudio.com/tv/museum.shtml to http://www.joemurraystudio.com/tv/museum.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Camp Lazlo characters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111004044705/http://joemurraystudio.com/blog/?p=2566 to http://joemurraystudio.com/blog/?p=2566
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:03, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified