lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:American Heroes Channel

message: I think there is cause for a disamb page
I am going to start one.  I doubt there is need for debate.  In that there are two american channels, all with adjective names, as well as a host of international.
--K3vin (talk) 00:51, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: how about some critics, cause all the mc says is: the US invited it... (bull. the US copied it)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.49.254.246 (talk) 22:57, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: critics

message: This was formerly The Airplane Channel! Sierraoffline444 (talk) 05:58, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was formerly... 

message: I don't see that anywhere. 
98.245.148.9 (talk) 05:37, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Whats the Viewership?

message: The links on the TV shows often don't go to a show for the TV Show page, even if there was one. I suggest they be removed entirely, as this is a stub article. 66.188.124.234 (talk) 22:37, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Better to fix them instead. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:27, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV Show links aren't related
Talk:Military courtesy

message: I'm no sock. I have finnished.- Want a public account? I reveal my pass word to all other users! My pass word is- "TGEPPB". --The golden easter party man (talk) 15:35, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

message: I've reverted to a previous version so as "to remove wall of text that made this article too specific to one service of one country. Although some of this material could be usefully integrated that's not the way to do it." (from edit log).  This removal was not related to any copypaste concerns.  As for those concerns then there is no copyright issue because, as a work of the Federal Government, the text is in the public domain.  If any of the text is re-inserted into the article it should, however, be properly attributed, probably using . Dpmuk (talk) 05:48, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of text and copypaste concerns 

message: IS this another article that will need to be AFD'd before anyone adds any sources, can we do this before it is AFD'dSlatersteven (talk) 13:43, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Susquehanna Symphony Orchestra

message: Three separate sources (two from the same publisher!) state the year of formation of this orchestra as three different years. 
- https://www.baltimoresun.com/2022/08/19/conductor-sheldon-bair-and-his-community-ensemble-keep-the-music-playing-in-harford/ - "All take their cues from Bair, 67, who founded the orchestra fresh out of college in 1976."
- https://www.baltimoresun.com/2023/10/20/susquehanna-symphony-to-perform-sheldon-bairs-homefront-based-on-letter-his-grandmother-wrote-during-wwii/ - "Sheldon Bair, who founded the Susquehanna Symphony in 1977, thinks of himself primarily as a music educator, not a composer."
- https://thebellarion.com/ae/2015/12/10/the-susquehanna-symphony-orchestra-comes-back-to-harford-county/ - "Originally formed in 1978, the orchestra played under the name “The Harford Community Orchestra.” The name changed to what it is now known today as in the year 1982."
For what it's worth, SSO themselves say 1978. I've edited the article to say "late 1970s" for now - any thoughts on how to resolve this, keeping in mind WP:CONFLICTING? Detetrident (talk) 01:07, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting sources - date of orchestra formation 

message: I've removed the notability tag from the article since I believe there are a sufficient amount of independent sources that cover the subject extensively (these are cited). Please let me know if you think otherwise! 
I've replaced it with a refimprove tag instead - for guidance on how to find sources, try looking on the official website (ssorchestra.org).
Staraction (talk) 01:36, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of notability tag
Talk:Military dummy

message: *http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/howaboutthat/7563546/Russias-inflatable-decoy-weapons-and-military-hardware-in-pictures.html
Regards, -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 05:27, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian decoys 
Talk:SWA (band)

message: It may not be worthy of mention (and moreover, finding documentation might be difficult), but my recollection is that SWA started as a sort of tongue-in-cheek youth cult and "sensitive singer-songwriter" music parody. This was in keeping with the generalized distrust and/or hatred of hippies (especially Charles Manson) frequently represented in Raymond Pettibon's artwork for Black Flag.
Early 'performances' took the form of Chuck coming out with an acoustic guitar (sometimes solo, sometimes with various Black Flag fans and hangers-on) and doing a faux-"sensitive" riff about how beautiful love is and how wonderful it is to be in love, etc. The joke was that the chorus was always "Hate, Kill, Destroy" and was repeated after each of the mock singer-songwriter lines. This configuration of SWA opened for the penultimate Throbbing Gristle show in Los Angeles in 1982.Pinverarity (talk) 10:15, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Swedish Radio Symphony Orchestra

message: Can the infobox from the Swedish wikipedia article be integrated into this article by sharing the info through wikidata? --62.98.99.49 (talk) 03:41, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  wikidata 

message: The orchestra's website still shows Honeck as principal conductor and doesn't mention Harding.  Has he taken over yet? Grover cleveland 13:48, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Current principal conductor (as of May 2007)
Talk:Republic of Guinea Armed Forces

message: *Battalion du Quartier General
*Camp Camayenne (BICC)
*Cabinet du MDN
*BATAILLON SPECIAL DE CONAKRY (CAMP ALPHA YAYA DIALLO)
*BATAILLON AUTONOME DE MAMOU (B.A.M.)  
*BATAILLON AUTONOME DE FARANAH
*DIRECTION GENERALE DE L'INTENDANCE MILITAIRE 
*1eme, 2eme
*3EME REGION MILITAIRE DE KANKAN
*4eme, 5eme  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.74.113.34 (talk) 23:14, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Guineephonebook.com

message: Not sure on the appropriate layout of information in military articles, but I reorganized some of the text in a way that seemed to make sense. On the history, some of the material might be integrated into History of Guinea. At the same time there are gaps - notably concerning events on the border with Liberia - and a need for more info on the 2008 disturbances. The latter are important background to current events in Guinea.--A12n (talk) 23:39, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rearanged ; editing suggestions 
Talk:Shout Out Out Out Out

message: Regarding the change made to the genre, NRMLS WLCM RCRDS self-desribe their genre as electro in Calgary's BeatRoute magazine. And again in Calgary's FFWD Weekly. I recognize that the electro article is rather weak and the dance-punk article is stronger in contrast but I don't believe dance-punk adequately defines their genre. I'm going to switch it back to electro on the main page unless there is any disagreement. I'll be doing the same to NRMLS WLCM. Msoron 06:27, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure I see why it has to be an either/or situation; it would be perfectly valid to say "electro/dance-punk" since both genres do apply. I don't think Wikipedia's bottom line rule is to necessarily take a band's own self-description of its musical genre as the final word, especially since a lot of bands these days tend to use self-invented microgenre terms that would never actually merit a Wikipedia article. I'm not objecting to your change, because it's certainly true that they fit the electro description; I just wonder why it has to be one term or the other, when the label "dance-punk" does also have relevance to what Shout Outx4 are doing. Bearcat 08:14, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good point, actually. In retrospect I was perhaps looking at it with an either/or perspective. The addition of both would probably be best, despite my reservations. Msoron 06:58, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre

message: I'd strongly recommend that certain speedy-happy editors learn to recognize the vast difference between "non-notable" and "well, I've never heard of them, harrumph harrumph". This is not a band that qualifies as non-notable by any stretch of the imagination; they're one of the most heavily hyped bands on the Canadian indie rock scene right now. Airplay on CBC Radio 3, in fact, singlehandedly vitiates non-notability; airplay on a national radio network is explicitly spelled out in WP:MUSIC as, in and of itself, a criterion for an automatic keep. Bearcat 04:12, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: I would also 'strongly' recommend that others not pop in opinions on the quality of the dance pit.  This is wikipedia, not a home page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.80.113.127 (talk) 17:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sweaty dance pit
Talk:Bufori

message: Thank you for this sentence. References of texts about "Bufori is acronym or backronym" in the internet is not good enough (that may made by fans). I found a magazine writing about  that, but there are no source or using data from the internet, and that company doesn't claim or said about its name is. --Love Krittaya (talk) 05:57, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name "Bufori" does not have an essential meaning. 

message: This car (Bufori) looks remarkably similar to the Madison kitcar based upon a VW-Beetle floorpan. I would presume it is based upon the Bufori?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.134.94.21 (talk) 09:21, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Madison Sports Car
Talk:Armed Forces of Montenegro

message: The VCR has apparently had a rehaul. At least, there are some changes in the displayed orbats.
: * The Training and Support Brigade has been renamed as the Training and Support Base.
: * The Infantry Brigade is now called Light Infantry Brigade. New Light Infantry Brigade OrBat
: * New Special Operations Brigade Orbat I guess the Naval Unit could mean "Marine Infantry" or something like that. The VCR page is... quite concise and lacks any detail =\
Enjoy! Russoswiss (talk) 20:46, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: VCR webpage orbats update

message: This article requires an update, so anyone is welcome to improve the article :-). Rave92(talk) 18:54, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 
Talk:Sammarinese Armed Forces

message: I propose that Corps of Gendarmerie of San Marino be merged into this article. 'Corps of Gendarmerie of San Marino' is a small and unreferenced article which adds nothing to the subject other than a photograph (which can easily be merged to this article). Timothy Titus Talk To TT 04:44, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No comments received. Merge executed on 12 September. Timothy Titus Talk To TT 02:18, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: I propose that Guardia di Rocca be merged into this article. 'Guardia di Rocca' is a small and unreferenced article which adds nothing to the subject other than photographs (which can easily be merged to this article). It is largely copied from this article in any case. Timothy Titus Talk To TT 04:54, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No comments received. Merge executed on 13 September. Timothy Titus Talk To TT 11:11, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Second merger proposal
Talk:King, Queen, Knave

message: The Russian title "Король, дама, валет (Korol', dama, valet)" shows in the edit mode a "T" at the end, but it comes out as an "m" in the article. Can this be fixed? Thanks.Ekem (talk) 17:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I used a Latin "T" as a temporary fix.Ekem (talk) 21:12, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Russian title
Talk:Armed Forces of the Republic of the Congo

message: Type 62 is a Japanese MG but included in the tanks. The list has no sources. I'll try to polish it as much as possible. Sir Jazer 13 (talk) 10:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  No source with wrong equipment (1) 
Talk:Military operation

message: aldkfjdicndfdsfjsadklajdfkldmcdslkfjd,mclkfjf
* "Battle" is conventionally used to refer to any cohesive armed engagement, from an encounter between two platoons to a multi-year operation involving several army groups.  Certainly, for events before WWII, this is the only usage of the word that is encountered, and it supplants pretty much everything else.
* "Campaign" generally means a series of battles (of whatever size); I've never seen a different definition used that paid attention to the size of the formations involved.
* "Operation" is a very vague term that can mean anything from a bombing run to an entire war effort, depending on the context.
Beyond that, the other definitions don't seem to be coming from a reputable source; is there one that's just not cited, or are these original research? Kirill Lokshin 02:12, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it looks like the content has found its way to the war article, so the discussion is best continued there. Kirill Lokshin 03:10, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New definitions 

message: I added a process since an operation is obviously a process and not a random assembly of the varous activities described in the earlier version of the article.
I have done so from memory because I do not have a handy reference to hand just now to source the article, so would appreciate help. For the most part its a basic logical structure.--Mrg3105 (talk) 09:04, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A process 

message: 'Military mission' re-directs to this page, when it ought to re-direct to 'Military liaison missions'. Valetude (talk) 22:50, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong re-direct
Talk:Military strike

message: This article reads like an academic paper, but I am not sure how this issue could be fixed. The main problem might be excessive in-text citations to other sources, including parenthetical references. A better article would streamline the references and create a more coherent overview of the topic. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:443C:9603:3623:E956 (talk) 18:51, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed some of the long paraphrasing sections as a start. The article will need to be expanded with more encyclopedic content though from diverse sources. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:443C:9603:3623:E956 (talk) 18:56, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article reads like an academic paper
Talk:Military surplus

message: Does the term "miliatary surplus" also describe what the military terms Excess Defense Articles (EDA)?  70.247.160.227 (talk) 00:30, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excess Defense Articles 

message: Is an image from a military museum really a good example of surplus? --BjKa (talk) 22:15, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trucks image
Talk:Military tradition

message: Perhaps this article could benefit from a generalized perspective.  Excessive focus on national cultures hides the core, universal aspects of tradition that all militaries share.  One finds in the annals of history that both familial and regimental traditions are highly relevant to military continuity for every nation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.17.55.225 (talk) 14:11, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Switchblade Symphony

message: Would it be fair to compare Switchblade to Siouxsie? I have see a review of Serpentine Gallery for some online record store that specifically makes that connection and I've been asked on 2 occasions when letting people hear Switchblade if it was Siouxsie and the Banshees. Well if I can find the source and no one has a good argument to object, I will include itTheDarknessVisible
:doneTheDarknessVisible 20:54, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comparison to Siousxie and The Banshees

message: I added one compilation that wasn't on the list.  The other entries don't have citations so I didn't add one either.... but if anyone is interested here is some info on this recording - http://www.vividzine.com/From_The_Machine.html Jtsterling (talk) 09:49, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Compilations
Talk:Mouse-holing

message: Changed example of how to create a mouse hole in the original article.  This is the explanation.
Someone originally used an example of using a bazooka to create the mouse hole.  Mouse holes are created usually from within a room or other enclosed area to a room or other enclosed area, either in the same building/residence/business or to another immediately joining.  A bazooka (a form of man packable rocket launcher or recoilless rifle) being fired creates significant back blast (a *very* high temperature and pressure wave to the rear of the weapon) and a large explosion when the projectile contacts the target.  Both of which would likely kill the bazooka operator in an enclosed space.  Mouse holes were usually made by digging when covert action was required, and by smaller, man portable explosive charges when in battle (and covert action was pointless).  A charge could be set and the person setting it could get clear while it exploded.
Bazookas and other similar weapons were and are sometimes the preferred method to create openings to enter buildings when house clearing.  This allows the attackers to blast a hole in an external wall and avoid potential booby traps that can be set by defenders at obvious entry points like doors and windows. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Theshowmecanuck (talk • contribs) 22:10, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See Urban warfare#Battle of Berlin (source Beevor, Antony. Berlin: The Downfall 1945, Penguin Books, 2002,  pp. 316-319). Beevor notes that the Soviets found captured/disgaded German panzerfausts (with their shaped chages) very effective for this job because when the Soviets used sledghammers to make a hole, a German defender was likely to drop a grenade through the hole as soon as it was made killing the man with the sledgehammer. --Philip Baird Shearer 11:52, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Method of Mouse Holing 

message: The article needs a discussion of historical examples of the technique, such as the Battle of Monterey, 1846.  173.16.252.154 (talk) 23:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The first recorded use of this tactic was the Battle of Bexar (San Antonio, TX).   The Texans dug thru the walls from room to room, and defeated the Mexicans.    I'll look around for the documentation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.67.104.4 (talk) 14:35, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Examples 
Talk:Syndicate of Sound

message: Article currently states: The band is often thought of as a one hit wonder, on account of their 1966 top ten hit "Little Girl". By whom? Passive sentences are a haven for weasely concepts. Wikipedia isn't Rolling Stone magazine -- we're an encyclopedia, not a music review site. Who often thinks of this band as a one hit wonder? You personally don't get to express your opinion here! Either cite your source(s) or avoid weasely sentences and pejorative labels. Example: The band had just one top ten hit -- "Little Girl" in 1966. I'd change it myself ... but I honestly don't know that much about Syndicate of Sound and how well their music did (or did not) chart. 66.17.118.207 13:36, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: User comment

message: Just wondering about this classification. To my ears, Little Girl was pure pop rock using similar instrumentation as the Byrds, Beatles and others. Is the tag applied due to the style of the rest of their recorded output?THX1136 (talk) 13:42, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psychedelic Rock clasification 

message: I cannot find any verification of Larry Ray re-joining the band in 2005, not even on the cited reference. I'll wait a few days for any comments before editing out that sentence. Frankzappatwin (talk) 20:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: OK Found verification elsewhere.Frankzappatwin (talk) 10:57, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Larry Ray
Talk:T-Connection

message: I have noticed that past member (now deceased), Berkeley VanBird has been left out! Please include! 64.150.240.114 (talk) 16:28, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ADD PAST MEMBER
Talk:Shorts Belfast

message: Heavylift Australia have brought a 2nd Belfast back into service and this is currently being refitted in Southend as far as I am aware for commercial service shortly. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 149.8.248.2 (talk) 15:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2nd Belfast back in service 

message: There is a more informative article Short Belfast (with the correct designation), so the information contained for "Shorts Belfast" should be merged with it and this one deleted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TraceyR (talk • contribs) 11:22, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: suggest merge/deleting this page
Talk:North Atlantic Council

message: I introduced the about template to distinguish the Atlantic Council from the North Atlantic Council. While the names are distinguishable, they can be confused, leading to interpretation of articles like this as if the NATO had decided military mobilization to deter Russia, which it hasn't, it's just the think tank... doing its... thing. -- Seelefant (talk) 20:36, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  About template 

message: The article is very poor in content and quality.
Even in general aspects as the one mentioning the "28 members meeting" when the picture attached has clearly more than 28 members attending.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.244.1.78 (talk) 10:02, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor quality
Talk:Rebecca Ward

message: Uhhhh...."Ward is the only sabre fencer in the world to beat Xue Tan of China and did so twice in the 2006–2007 season."
So Marial Zagunis beating Tan for the gold at Athens in 04 doesn't count??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.119.37.180 (talk) 22:35, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it worth mentioning that Ward was homeschooled? I have sources from a newspaper interview with her. 75.69.129.253 (talk) 19:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  homechooled? 
Talk:Officer of the day

message: Is this limited to the British military (and perhaps those of former colonies?), or is it universal? -- Avocado (talk) 19:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context 

message: It would be nice to know what, in 'Other duties include ceremonial duties (such as carrying out Colours or Sunset)', colours and sunset are.31.52.253.146 (talk) 19:42, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colours/Sunset
Talk:List of nicknames of United States Army divisions

message: The name of this article should be changed to "List of nicknames of U.S. Army divisions".--Looper5920 11:25, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Operation Claret

message: the sources quoted as saying that SAS were used to detect indon forces moving into Sab/Sar so that they could be ambushed in Kalimantan or on the border is nonsense, suggest the quoted sources don't geddit.  For starters it was impossible time-wise (particularly if they were adhering to the golden rules about 2 wks planning and reheasal!).  It's likely they're confusing SAS xborder recce with detection of indon forces who had entered sab/sar and the rapid deployment of ambush and other patrols into likely areas by helicopter. Such detection was actually more likely by locals and Border Scouts than by SF. The nearest SF might get to spotting impending incursions would be through sustained recce and recognising when the Indon pattern of routine behavior changed in a particular place, this would then need to be intelligence assesed. Pocock makes clear that Walker was planning clarets to keep the indons off balance on the entire length of the border, he was not responding to hints of impending offensivce action by and against particular indon units.  If the quotes are correct then I don't think Dennis, etc, are reliable sources.Nfe (talk) 11:23, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ops
Talk:Talisman (band)

message: This really needs to be NPOV Lemmony
:I agree.  I'm adding a NPOV tag, as this article reads like an advertisement about this "excellent" band and its "amazing" bass player.  I know nothing of the band to contribute to the article, and it appears the whole article is POV, so a major cleanup is needed. --Ataricodfish 15:02, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled