Talk:Coalition combat operations in Afghanistan in 2006

message: The article War in Afghanistan (2001–present) was getting very big, far bigger than the recommended wikipedia length. As other phases of the war had separate articles, I thought the NATO mission (of which there is more detail that could go on), warranted its own article. Also no doubt the nature of operations in Afghanistan in 2007 may well change. I have called it Coalition combat operations in Afghanistan in 2006 to recognise that not all western forces (in particular US) operate under NATO control and to exclude ISAF forces in the north not involved in combat operations. Chwyatt 11:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Add an order of battle as troop units will no doubt change in 2007 Chwyatt 13:53, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: order of battle

message: What is the best way to list flags? I have currently listed them in terms of who has largest number of troops at the top (only in the south) rather than alphabetically. Chwyatt 17:18, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Flags

message: I have been tidying up the years on Afghanistan 2001 in Afghanistan / 2002 in Afghanistan / 2003 in Afghanistan / 2004in Afghanistan and have bought them all back to there own individual pages. They were across many month pages, with very little useful info. Now they still need to be tidied up, and extranaeous info removed. However, I did notice that 2006 / 2007 / 2008 we had completely changed the format. Anybody know why? Should we create the articles for 2005 in Afghanistan / 2006 in Afghanistan / 2007 in Afghanistan / 2008 in Afghanistan / 2009 in Afghanistan ?? Jez t e C 21:26, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  year in Afghanistan 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:02, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Canadian soldiers during Operation Medusa.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Coalition combat operations in Afghanistan in 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071208065114/http://www.army.forces.gc.ca/lf/English/6_1_1.asp?id=1275 to http://www.army.forces.gc.ca/lf/English/6_1_1.asp?id=1275
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926220724/http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/DefenceNews/MilitaryOperations/RnAndRafHarrierCombatOpsGearUpAsRoyalNavyCrewsJoinTheFightAgainstTheTalebanvideo.htm to http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/DefenceNews/MilitaryOperations/RnAndRafHarrierCombatOpsGearUpAsRoyalNavyCrewsJoinTheFightAgainstTheTalebanvideo.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070315191426/http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/2005/nr20051220-12185.html to http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/2005/nr20051220-12185.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:44, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Coalition combat operations in Afghanistan in 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070224153539/http://www2.hq.nato.int/ISAF/media/pdf/placemat_isaf.pdf to http://www2.hq.nato.int/ISAF/media/pdf/placemat_isaf.pdf
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120527021015/http://www.southcoasttoday.com/daily/10-06/10-19-06/16world-nation.htm to http://www.southcoasttoday.com/daily/10-06/10-19-06/16world-nation.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070223050602/http://www.kmweg.com/gb/index.php to http://www.kmweg.com/gb/index.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080527100040/http://www.mindef.nl/en/news/2006/1/20060125_news.aspx to http://www.mindef.nl/en/news/2006/1/20060125_news.aspx
*Added  tag to http://www.mindef.nl/service/fotogalerij/frmMediaItemDetails.aspx?nMediaItemID=221
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080527100040/http://www.mindef.nl/en/news/2006/1/20060125_news.aspx to http://www.mindef.nl/en/news/2006/1/20060125_news.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified