Talk:History of the Teller–Ulam design

message: This page is lifted as-is from User:Fastfission's version of the Teller-Ulam design page, separated out because the technical page is just too long.  Full credit for the work goes to Fastfission.  Georgewilliamherbert 21:15, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Three years later: I tried to give the page an overhaul. I rewrote the lead paragraph and added a lead image and caption. I also attempted to streamline the convoluted referencing methodology: at the end of the article, we had a "References" section with a ; a "References" section that listed the sources used by topic; and a "Notes" section that manually listed what was already in the first (reflist) "References" section. Whereas in the body, we had refs; we had plain urls in square brackets; and we had sources in parenthesis (only in one instance, with an accompanying page no.), all corresponding to the second (topical) "References" section. So, still much work to do, but an appreciable improvement nonetheless, I would hope. Incidentally, the Notes section now largely duplicates the contents of the topical References section (I removed the duplicate References section, of course), but I like the setup, so I'm incline to keep em both as is. Thx. El_C 06:20, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This page is

message: The image :Image:China H-bomb 1967.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
The following images also have this problem:
*:Image:The Progressive H-bomb cover.jpg
*:      Image:Stanislaw Ulam.jpg
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:39, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I went through and added the rationales as required.  Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 04:59, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:China H-bomb 1967.jpg

message: An image used in this article, File:Rsd 37 nuclear test.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 9 December 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:44, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Rsd 37 nuclear test.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: *United States v. The Progressive
This is a fascinating legal case, anyone want to collaborate on improving the page with me? Please leave a note on my user talk page, — Cirt (talk) 19:00, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  United States v. The Progressive    

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of the Teller–Ulam design. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927183818/http://www.progressive.org/images/pdf/1179.pdf to http://progressive.org/images/pdf/1179.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:46, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello, I was wondering if there has been much more information found on the French develpoment on the Teller-Ulam Design during the 1960-1970s?ANNA1120 (talk) 23:34, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  French Teller-Ulam Design 

message: The article mentions a few times the unexpected yield of Castle Bravo, but not why. As its article explains, it was not realized that Li-7 would contribute to the fusion reaction, and the fuel used was 50% Li-7.  Now, extra fusion means more neutrons and more fission of the U-238 around the bomb, but the underlying reason is the Li-7. Gah4 (talk) 01:21, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Castle Bravo]] and Li-7 

message: There should be a separate subsection dedicated to the debate of who should receive credit/ how much credit should go to who. Article is dominated by the debate. 81.134.60.119 (talk) 00:26, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debate over who should be given credit.