lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sandra Bem

message: Bem also created the theory of situational inference, which I know nothing about but would like to know something about. Can anybody add this to the page? DivineAna 00:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: #This is an article about a scientist. How is the extensive coverage of he early family life relevant to her notability. If it is possibly relevant to her feminism, this needs to have been discussed by a 3rd party reliable source--it cannot be inferred from her own biography--that would be WP:SYNTHESIS, which is original research , and we  we do not do that here. 
#.According to the relevant guideline, WP:PROF, she needs to be shown as an expert in her subject. This is normally done either by awards, or publications I do not sere any awards listed. The importance of the publications is shown by their citation record, which can be gotten from Web of Science, or Scopus--or if necessary Google, but if this project is being done at a university either WoS or Scopus should be available. Please add this information for her most cited publications.  DGG ( talk ) 01:37, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: comments

message: The "Social Context" section seems to clearly be pov and engages in editorialising beyond the scope of an encylopedia:
"To fully appreciate Sandra Bem’s role in psychology, it is important to understand the context in which she was working. Today, egalitarianism is not a new concept because more women have been stepping up and demanding the respect and value they deserve."
"Women liked the idea of equality, but Bem was repeatedly told that she would be unable to uphold her ideal of egalitarianism once she had children"
"In addition, she was working in a university setting dominated by white men – not in a ring of liberal women bent on busting through the patriarchy. She was alone, with the support of her partner, Daryl, giving her the strength to push forward and head the movement she had helped establish."
etc  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThoaAleph123 (talk • contribs) 13:34, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Social Context" section clearly pov 
Talk:Osseledets

message: The same hairstyle with the same name also exists in Mongolia.
:Inreresting. Anyone care dig deeper? - üser:Altenmann >t 04:06, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: In Mongolia

message: I keep intending to dig up a copy of Bely's "Petersburg" (the Penguin version, if memory serves me correctly), where the protagonist is introduced to an unpleasant Ukrainian businessman whom he describes as a typical khokhol. 'Khokhol' is footnoted as being a pejorative term.
If anyone has a copy and can access it before me, it would be appreciated. If not, I'll get around to it at some point in the future. Cheers. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  English language definition as pejorative 

message: Support - an obvious WP:FORK; same subject. I have no idea why  forked it. - üser:Altenmann >t 04:05, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing merge proposal, given consensus not to merge; added a Template:main in order to keep the link between the two pages. Klbrain (talk) 17:56, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge suggestion
Talk:House Hunting Mice

message: The lobby card says Merrie Melodies. However, the ending music of the reissue says Looney Tunes. Which is correct? FMAFan1990 (talk) 16:08, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was originally a Looney Tune, but it was reissued as a Blue Ribbon Merrie Melodies. Agtax 23:45, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  this site has the lobby card for the cartoon, and it says "A Merrie Melodie Cartoon In Cinecolor". FMAFan1990 (talk) 00:39, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As stated, the Merrie Melodies series with no credits were originally Looney Tunes. Agtax 00:52, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Which series is it?
Talk:Ukrainska Pravda

message: This article contradicts itself with the article about Georgiy_R._Gongadze.
This newspaper is supposedly founded in 2001 and Gondadze died in 2000.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.98.196.2 (talk) 20:41, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Currently (since July 2018) says 16 April 2000, "the day of the Ukarainian constitutional referendum". The correct (?) year, month, and reference to the referendum have been there since at latest January   2012. DavidLeeLambert (talk) 12:44, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founded by a dead guy? 

message: It would be useful with a comment about if there is any connection between the Ukrainian Pravda and the Pravda in Russia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.232.224.158 (talk) 16:37, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any relationship to the Russian Pravda? 

message: I'm just curious here, since this article is really thin on information; the Russian / Soviet Pravda was/is used as a tool for state propaganda. 
Is there anything similar going on with this Ukranian Pravda? It would seem an odd choice for a name, given the negative connotations of the Soviet version unless perhaps it had been devised as a similar tool. Hypothesis with literally nothing to back that up... I wonder if anyone can enlighten me? I think if it is / has been known to be then it should be included in the article. If not, then the question can die here in the talk page ... which nobody seems to be reading/responding to given the 2 other comments are 11 years and 3+ years old.. 90.254.188.159 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 01:40, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Pravda means “truth” or “justice” in several Slavic languages. It is a common name for a paper, like Times, Enquirer, or Tribune in English. —Michael Z. 00:26, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any use as a tool of state propaganda ? 

message: This Wikipedia should have a "History" section. Just like the Wikipedia article on Der Spiegel (online). Unfortunately I do not have the time now for creating this section..... — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 21:34, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Does this newspaper qualify as an RS? I assume that it was at the time of Gongadze. But how about right now? I ask because it is used for sourcing on page Roman Protasevich. My very best wishes (talk) 14:58, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note to myself/or others..... This Wikipedia should have a "History" section 

message: This article is lacking the NPOV required by Wikipedia, as well as reliable citations, particularly in the History section. For example, this paragraph:
"Staff and contributors of Ukrainska Pravda have pioneered many legal and research techniques aimed at advancing freedom of information in Ukraine, particularly those concerning the government spending, government procurement and offshore tax evasion. Staff journalists routinely participate in non-partisan public actions promoting democracy and press freedom in the country." Whaledancer (talk) 18:36, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lacks neutral point of view
Talk:Khmelnytskyi

message: Was this city actually founded in 1493, or is that when it was first mentioned? Greenshed 16:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Category:1431 establishments in Ukraine has been nominated for upmerging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:18, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:1431 establishments in Ukraine]] has been nominated for upmerging

message: In Lithuanian it means the place where something is separated, like Bug is Baiga in Lithuanian and means "the end/final river" 86.38.75.174 (talk) 14:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  the name of the city is Proskyra 

message: Whats the story of the statue?
See also: De-Leninization, Demolition_of_monuments_to_Vladimir_Lenin_in_Ukraine
Thanks for the help with this research, Jaredscribe (talk) 03:56, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Lenin Statue in the Park, Falls

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 18:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine →  – WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Khmelnytskyi already redirects to this page anyway. I would make this an uncontroversial technical request but the fact that this page is so old and for such a major city makes me uncertain enough to make it an RM. HappyWith (talk) 17:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Ukraine has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:34, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Cities has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:34, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 January 2024
Talk:Territorial disputes of Nicaragua

message: The last part of the article says Costa Rica has claims concerning the sovereignity over the San Juan River. That is untrue. Niacragua is the EXCLUSIVE owner of the river and Costa Rica is not contesting that. The present dispute in the International Court of Justice is exclusively about the extension of the rights of navigation Costa Rica has in the lower section of the said river.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.40.57.129 (talk) 22:20, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The caption is not the place to discuss such contentious issues. Create a new section and please use reliable and neutral sources (preferably not news outlets from neither CR or Nicaragua) such as the New York Times, The Economist, etc. Local news outlets are good only to reference the position of each government. Since this is an ongoing dispute, the use of RS and keeping NPOV might be enforced strictly. Even better would be to discuss and look for consensus here first.-Mariordo (talk) 00:31, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do not use the image captions to develop the article, create a section for this particular dispute, and provided both point of view in a balanced way. I assumed you are acting on good faith so I will not reverse again, but please fix it. Contentious issues should be edited rigorously following wiki policies.-Mariordo (talk) 06:17, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A section dealing with this subject was created in the article Nicaragua–Costa Rica San Juan River border dispute#2010 Isla Calero dispute. I moving some of my previous comments to the Talk page in that article.-Mariordo (talk) 17:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 2010 Controversy with Costa Rica

message: This article distorts reality, because there is no territorial dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Gulf of Fonseca.
The ruling of the International Court of Justice in The Hague, 1992 is binding for El Salvador and Honduras compliance, but is not binding on Nicaragua, who was an observer during the trial.
Nicaragua and El Salvador are State bordering the Gulf of Fonseca.
~~David Pastor May, 04, 2015~~  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PastorDavid (talk • contribs) 21:02, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is no territorial dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Gulf of Fonseca
Talk:Leon Polk Smith

message: It appeared that this page was first expanded by Smith's Estate's current galleries, Richard Gray and Lissom Gallery in particular. My updates represent Smith is an important (in relative terms) 20th C. American artist and deserves (IMHO) a more complete look. His Correspondence and Constellations series are highly original creations, for example. The page has been filled out to include this information.
Sicklemoon (talk) 04:14, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: This Page
Talk:C. A. L. Totten

message: I first encountered Totten's books while reading up on his chronological speculations and his British Israelism, and I think that his influence on that movement alone is deserving of a Wikipedia entry (although I no longer have easy access to his writings, so I can only create a stub at this time).
His military science career is also intriguing, and I wonder if anyone with expertise in that area (or who has access to library resources at UMass or Yale) could do a little digging and see what they can find there. Demmeis 00:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soliciting help 

message: From what I can tell, most contemporaneous sources seem to have his name as "Charles A. L. Totten," and his full name as "Charles Adiel Lewis Totten." Is the spelling here, "Adelle", just a mistake? Also, if the common usage of this name is "Charles A. L. Totten," then would it be good to rename this article to that? Rudolph85 (talk) 12:44, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It would appear that "Adiel" is the correct spelling.  The Cullum's Register of Graduates of the United States Military Academy (listed in this page's references - although not linked as a reference) has him listed as "Charles A. L. Totten" and "Charles Adiel Lewis Totten". Butlerblog (talk) 20:45, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of Charles Totten's name 

message: There was a reference to Herbert Armstrong, the Worldwide Church of God, and Christian Identity as adherents of British Israelism.  I removed this for two reasons. (1) It's not specific to Totten. While Armstrong was a proponent of British Israelism, there is no reference that he was specifically influenced by Totten's work (like he was with J.H. Allen, who he possibly plagarized). Armstrong is referenced in articles about British Israelism, but this page is about Totten specifically, so it's irrelevant to the page's subject matter.  Same for Christian Identity.  (2) The sentence was poorly worded so as to imply a relationship between Armstrong, the Worldwide Church of God, **and** Christian Identity. While Armstrong was a believer in British Israelism, he was/is not associated with the more extremist Christian Identity views. Same for the Worldwide Church of God, whose views are not Christian Identity views. If someone really insists on bringing this irrelevant content back into this page, please at least reword it so there isn't an improper connection drawn between these two separate groups. Butlerblog (talk) 21:07, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  References to British Israelism
Category talk:Women writers by historical period

message: After some discussion on the main category talkpage, the following has been suggested:
*Women writers (ancient)[now exists]
*Women writers (early medieval period) [now exists]
*Women writers (10th century) [now exists]
*Women writers (11th century) [now exists]
*Women writers (12th century) [now exists]
*Women writers (13th century) [now exists]
*Women writers (14th century) [now exists]
*Women writers (15th century) [now exists]
*Women writers (16th century) [now exists]
*Women writers (17th century) [now exists]
*Women writers (18th century) [now exists]
*Women writers (19th century) [now exists]
*Women writers (20th century) [now exists]
*Women writers (21st century) [now exists]
— scribblingwoman 00:28, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See a fuller discussion at Category talk:Women writers#Possible subcategories. — scribblingwoman 02:05, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 discussion 

message: I have been categorizing writers according to the publication dates of their works, when known, rather than their dates of birth and/or death. Also, I have been putting writers in two categories in cases where their initial publications clearly span two centuries. Writers with posthumous publications are something else: I would go by dates of writing, known or assumed, rather than dates of posthumous publication. This seems commonsense (?) but I thought I had better throw it out there. — scribblingwoman 02:18, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried to avoid too many duplicate centuries, but there are some that are unavoidable.  But I do try to focus on when they "flourished" rather than when they were born or died; someone born in 1190 would clearly belong to the 13th century in my mind.  Where all there is is date of death and birth, I think death is usually a bit more relevant since the first dozen to dozen and a half years of life tend not to produce as much writing. A Musing 15:14, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deciding where to put someone 

message: I see that Westernized periods have now been imposed on all the time periods.  I'm not sure why, for exmaple, the "Renaissance" qualifies as a useful period outside of a rather small sliver of the world.  I'd prefer to eliminate the Western infrastructure and return to straightforward time periods. A Musing 15:03, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I take it back - I see it's been done both ways.  I'm going to add a cross-references, but that sounds fine.  It may make sense to add to the "historical periods" some of the non-Western periodization schemes.A Musing 15:08, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Periodization
Talk:Union Cane (character)

message: As much as a Rocky fan as I am. The article first of all is supposed to be about Union Cane. The entire fictional timeline doesn't belong. Secondly where did this fictinal timeline comefrom? Is it fan made. Source book made what? --Xiahou 00:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Why didn't Rocky just take on Union Cane? If Gunn knocked him out in the first round, Rocky could have defended his title for sure. Brain-damaged or not, Rocky would still have held the title and his pride. 134.29.6.7 13:47, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cane v. Rocky
Talk:Second Chance (1953 film)

message: The film is an early 3-D film (and rare color film noir) with a arguably a solid cast: Mitchum, Palance, et al.  Will make a NPOV case in article, with a reference, needless to say.  Cheers, Wikepedians-- Luigibob (talk) 23:05, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay. See Background section. Luigibob (talk) 14:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why Mid importance
Talk:Song Yingxing

message: I think that all of the long block quotations in this article detract somewhat from its quality.  We should relay the contents, of course, but in our own words and with commentary.  I will probably start trying to convert the quotes into something more substantial later today.--Danaman5 14:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fine, just don't mess with the first one in agriculture. That one stays, since I do not want to mess with his own words on that.--PericlesofAthens 19:22, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All the new pictures that are in the article were uploaded by me yesterday. I think the number of new pictures is sufficient, considering that there is a gallery at the end as well.--PericlesofAthens 19:23, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Long block quotes

message: This article should ideally be more or less about the individual Song Yingxing. I suggest that Tiangong kaiwu be split from this article to be its own article rather then remain a section here. -- Sjschen (talk) 18:32, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A bit late, but I've been bold and split the section off; if 90% of an article about an author is about one of their books, that book deserves its own page. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:41, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split into two
Talk:Shyamchi Aai (1953 film)

message: Article had used film's theatrical poster (File:SHYAMCHI AAI.jpg) for infobox. This image has rendering problem for Internet Explorer. This is observed on IE6, IE7 and IE8 which are widely being used. To avoid this rendering problem, another image, DVD cover image (File:Shyamchi Aai.gif) is uploaded and tested to be working as expected on the earlier mentioned browsers. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 00:18, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: What exactly do you mean by "rendering problem"?  I would like this in greater detail before the theatrical poster gets deleted.  You did not mention a rendering problem on the talk page before you uploaded the DVD cover or in the edit summary when you switched out the images. In a film's infobox, a theatrical poster should be used over the DVD cover image. I am going to revert back to the theatrical poster until there is further detail to warrant its deletion. Aspects (talk) 06:46, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: My bad that I did not explain the problem properly and reverted the edit as well as did not put anything on talk page or while switching to newer image! Here you go with what I meant by 'rendering problem'. Theatrical poster (File:SHYAMCHI AAI.jpg) is not displayed when used on Internet Explorer browser with the versions 6, 7 and 8. It just shows the empty box with image missing mark/sign on it. Even when you click on the file and check for the image, it is still not displayed individually as well. I agree that we shall use theatrical poster over DVD cover. Let me know if further explanation is required. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 13:02, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this really a problem with the image, or could it problem with either Internet Explorer or your computer?  Perhaps you could find a help page to get someone else's opinion on the image because I am not sure where to post for help. Aspects (talk) 22:12, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This could be a problem with either image or IE, because I tried it one several computers. You can check it here as well. I will try finding out help on this. By that time, can you help me out on (File:Shyamchi Aai.gif)? Image is getting tagged as orphaned. Unless we have a conclusion here, can we not stop the other image getting tagged? Thanks. - VivvtTalk 23:42, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hey, it was an image problem. I got it fixed with the help of Saibo. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 00:14, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  There are still some modifications need to be done to the image. I am in talk with Saibo. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 17:26, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film image
Talk:VLA-4

message: Good afternoon ImmCarle66,
My name is ImmCarle75, and I look forward to seeing your updates and revisions.
Immcarle75 (talk) 15:26, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: I believe this is also called CDw49d in some literature  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.241.229.131 (talk) 10:42, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate name?
Talk:Stanisław Lubieniecki

message: Google Print search:
*"Stanisław Lubieniecki" - 102 publications
*"Stanislaus de Lubienietz" - 9 publications
Any move from original name ("Stanisław Lubieniecki") should be preceded by a rationale, RM vote and discussion.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  13:45, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name