lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lycurgus (disambiguation)

message: I replaced 
: Lycurgus or Lykurgus is a Greek male name most commonly referring to the Lacedaemonian Euhemerus figure ...
which could easily be vandalistic bafflegab as far as my research on it went. It's certainly lousy wording, and probably is not about anything that we cover encyclopedically. But i'd love to be shown i'm wrong. --Jerzy•t 23:52, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lacedaemonian Euhemerus figure 

message: It seems that most people who search for Lycurgus are looking for Lycurgus of Sparta.  In that situation, it seems appropriate to redirect there had have an "other uses" hatnote on that page that links to Lycurgus (disambiguation) (rather than have the dab page redirect here), per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.  Anyone opposed? RJC TalkContribs 18:38, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why not redirect, create dab article
Talk:List of regular mini-sections in Private Eye

message: Colemanballs has enough supporting information to merit its own article, but these three articles are just single-paragraph explanations with a lot of (fairly arbitrarily chosen) examples - they're funny, but they don't add anything to the article. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, and I think these would all be better off merged with the list article here. What do other editors think? --McGeddon 13:47, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging from Luvvies, Pseud's Corner and Dumb Britain
Talk:Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition (song)

message: *Okay, the only problem with deleting this one is, it wasn't nominated for deletion untill I made the pages for the other songs. Otherwise, no one had a problem with this page. That's why I say this page should not be deleted. FallenWings47 
::My issue with the article is that is about an individual song, that does not pass the proposed guidelines for notability at WP:MUSIC. How does the timing of the proposed deletion affect the notability? Kevin 21:54, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Manchester 3

message: Anyone coming up from London should be advised that Virgin Trains don't seem to be doing any offers that weekend, meaning the cheapest possible single fare from Euston to Piccadilly is £60 (£44 with a Y-P railcard). However I just managed to book it for £8.50 (young persons) using cheap deals from London to Sheffield on East Midlands Trains and Sheffield to Manchester on First Transpennine Express - takes about 45 minutes longer but definitely worth doing it that way round if you want to save money. - Zeibura (Talk) 21:20, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like I can save about a tenner by going via Sheffield as well, from Durham. Not as impressive a saving as yours, and it would be a much more restrictive ticket... I'm trying to decide if it's worth it. --Tango (talk) 21:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trains

message: I'm sure the Greater Manchester WikiProject would be interested in this. -- Jza84 · (talk) 01:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've alerted them of this . -- Jza84 · (talk) 01:58, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:GM]] 

message: Is anybody driving from London to it? I'm a little cashstrapped so could really do with a lift:P Poeloq (talk) 22:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  London -- Manchester
Talk:Purity test

message: While I appreciate the documentation of the evolution of purity tests from the apparently original sexual purity test, I'm surprised that there are no references here to the purity tests conducted by would-be manufacturers of PC clones. You know, the meetings with a technically savvy inquisitor asking the potential recruit about any exposure to the original IBM BIOS, with a lawyer present for liability reasons.
I'll research for a section about these purity tests. Is anyone reading this? If so, who might know the canonical name for this type of purity test?  --Brad Eleven 13:55, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not only is this information unsourced, it appears to be almost completely made up and wrong.  If nobody objects I'm probably going to stubbify this article and replace it by what little I can source.  As far as /I/ know purity tests first became popular as one of the very first Inetnet memes via usenet in the early to mid 1980s.  They flew from newsgroup to newsgroup, email box to email box, in various ever expanding versions. They were never indended or used seriously, and despite the test's claims they were usually taken alone or discussed in small private settings rather than as a parlor game or a serious attempt to assess anything.  The statement that one tries to achieve a score of 70% seems random. Wikidemo (talk) 09:09, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007

message: One more problem with these so-called purity tests is that they ar not clear on whether marriage makes you "impure", that is, if you did some of these "activities" within marraige, are you supposed to answer "yes" or "no". For example, one question commonly asked is "Have you ever been completely undressed by a man?". In my case, the anwser is technically "yes", but the only man who does it to me is my husband. I certainly don't feel anything "impure" or "wrong" about it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.99.104.0 (talk) 13:00, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The correct answer in your question would be 'yes'. Purity (or Impurity) in the context of these tests is without regard to marriage.  You've been undressed by a man, and someone else taking the test may not have; therefore a lower Purity score.  Ghoti (talk) 20:38, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

text: That is the whole point. You are supposed to answer with the truth. Not try and get a low score. If there are 2000 questions it also indicates there are questions that cross reference to other questions and try to catch you out. Also that question is odd because 'ever' includes when you were a child. And many children are dressed and undressed by their parents at some point. 194.207.86.26 (talk) 13:39, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem
Talk:Calcium gluconate

message: I assume that you meant that, in treatment of hypocalcemia, 10% Calcium gluconate solution is usually used, which only has 0.93% calcium.  In large animals, 23% calcium gluconate is used.  I am going to edit the page to clarify that, because crystalline calcium gluconate is 9.3% calcium ion by mass. 97.81.107.25 (talk) 23:49, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hypocalcemia
Talk:Lycomedes of Scyros

message: I was "bald" and I removed this page from :d:Q1330532 as it is formally a page about ALL the Lycomedes. So it would be better if you want to link it again to rearrange it in such a way it is centered on Lycomedes of Scyros. I think you can leave details in the final section as an additional information, as in :sr:Ликомед, but moving them to Lycomedes (disambiguation) should be more appropriate.--Alexmar983 (talk) 16:53, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  asymmetry in wikidata
Talk:Irsai Olivér

message: Link needs to be fixed. (Community editor (talk) 16:18, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mishkenos HoRoim

message: this is a group that was formed to hold the old style Jerusalem chareidim in tact against all modern influences and movements, why should we put them in one single category of being opposed to Zionism?--יודל 14:14, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear Yidel, this group is known for being closer to Neturei Karta than anyone else. They recently held a Yortzeit tish for Reb Amrom Bloi zt'l. I have seen many pamphlets signed by Reb Rabinowitz zt'l referring to the Zionist tumoh asking for the quick dissolvement of the Zionist lie. --Eidah 14:32, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Dear Holy brother, if they are`close it does not mean that their relationship is defined by anti Zionism feelings it could very well be a whole host of reasons which has nothing to do with Zionism at all. the sons of reb amrom are davening there so they hosted the seuda. I agree with you that they are more anti then all other chareidy groups but its nothing particular with Zionism they want to live the ancient traditional way of life of their ancestors. don't be so obsessed with one single issue here.--יודל 14:38, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest that you get working equally on deleting the :Category:Religious Zionism from all articles which by your norms are inappropriate for that category. --Eidah 14:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the suggestion but if u want to proof some point here be aware that u r not allowed to disrupt wikipedia to proof a point. i went over all those ion that category i don't see any problem, they are a selective few who very well are defined by their activism and life to that category. This article is not at all defined by their opposition to Zionism--יודל 14:49, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: They are not '''anti''' zionism in particular

message: Someone added "The only evidence of the existence of this group to be found on the internet is the picture shown on this Wikipedia article." to the article.  I've moved that here, but added a verify tag, since there is only one source (a quote). Superm401 - Talk 23:32, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of sources
Talk:Nadja (band)

message: Nadja is quite a large name in the drone-scene nowadays, not just a small underground project. I think it's nonsense to delete all Nadja-pages, because they are quickly gaining popularity, proof being their releases being released in much greater numbers than before and growing still.
Boooooooomblastandruin 14:17, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: comment
Talk:Rail transport in Gibraltar

message: Is it alright that I redirect this article to Transport_in_Gibraltar#Rail? (given that it is currently an exact duplicate of the what appears in the latter.) -- Chris.B 14:17, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this is very thin at present, but I hope to add something on the Dockyard railway in due course. --Matthewross 21:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. It was just wondering. -- Chris.B 22:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope so, otherwise I'll be adding an article on pink tigers in Gibraltar, explaining how there aren't any. :-) The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick t 01:53, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect?

message: Speedy deletion is inappropriate. To quote from WP:CSD: "Where reasonable doubt exists, discussion using another method under the deletion policy should occur instead." I agree with the nominator's concerns, but feel that merging into Transport in Gibraltar would be far more apt. -- Chris B • talk • contribs 14:04, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree with that. Clearly it's a bit daft to have an article denying the existence of the contents of it's title, if that makes sense, but merging is sensible, unless of course adequate due is given to the content of this article already in the Transport in Gibraltar article. If so it's aduplicate and should be deleted. - Mickthefish | Talk 14:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Merging would provide a convenient redirect (esp. for the template; ). -- Chris B • talk • contribs 14:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merging suggests that it is a valid article.  When there is no railway in Gibraltar, "rail transport in Gibraltar" is not a valid article.  The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick t 16:17, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree wholeheartedly with you that this is a useless article, but I don't understand how merging would suggest that it is a valid article or what have you. Simply redirect the page to Transport in Gibraltar#Rail (as I originally suggested ) and add the bit about the dockyard. I don't think that is too much of a problem. -- Chris B • talk • contribs 16:26, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why does the article even need to exist though?  Who is going to look up "rail transport in Gibraltar"? The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick t 16:29, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can assure the acticle's creator did, otherwise it wouldn't be here in the first place. :) -- Chris B • talk • contribs 16:33, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion
Talk:Henley Bank High School

message: I've trimmed the non-encylopaedic content (school aims, etc). Too much of this article still sounds as though it's been lifted from the school prospectus/website. You need to adopt a neutral point of view. Pics, references and more on the school history would help. You might like to change to the standard UK schools infobox. Dahliarose 14:17, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess
Talk:Friedrich Wilhelm

message: I have not had a chance to compare, but this astronomer has written a very good page about all the Friedrich Wilhelm's. Not an exhaustive list, to be sure. I read it years ago, before this wiki existed, and just re-discovered it. Has quite a list:
http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~aty/bibliog/library/FW.html
73.220.34.167 (talk) 03:33, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Friedrich Wilhelm
Talk:Dene Magna School

message: More content needed and especially references if you want to avoid deletion. Dahliarose 14:20, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I'm not too sure, I could probably find one, but what is the copyright status of logos? Jdcooper 23:37, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo
Talk:Henry Clausen

message: Will have to relook (reborrow from library) at Clausen, but I don’t think he put Layton at the top of the list for culpability; Kimmel & Short both got 10 & FDR down at 5! But it was more organizational faults: two intelligence organizations AND two commanders in one place (cf Desert Storm victory = one commander he said). 
Was Clausen authorised by Congress; from Clausen’s meeting with Stinson it appears that Stinson had the Army Board report and decided to appoint a Special Investigator (as generally authorised by some act of Congress) rather than another Board. So did Clausen’s appointment have to go to the President or Congress for approval? 
Ferguson is Homer S. Ferguson , Senator from Michigan 
Gearhart is Bertrand W. Gearhart,  Congressman from California ??
But Murphy is ????? Does Clausen say where he is from? 
PS: is Clausen still alive (at c102?). Hugo999 14:28, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Lee says that Clausen died 4 December 1992 (ie not 1993), Lee page 16. He interviewed Clausen in August 1992, so I suppose he is right! 
Marching Orders: The Untold Story of World War II by Bruce Lee (1995, Crown, New York)  Hugo999 (talk) 03:03, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Died 1992
Talk:L' Atlantide

message: This page was originally an article about a film which duplicated one under the heading L'Atlantide (1921 film). (The duplication may have been missed because the title of this page includes an unwanted space.) Additional content from this page was incorporated in the other page, and this page is now redirected to a disambiguation page which explains some of the other hazards with this title. Lampernist (talk) 14:45, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Page explanation
Category talk:Orthodox Jewish anti-Zionism

message: I have left the following request on 's talk and I am still awaiting a response: Question: Are you a sock puppet of banned User:Daniel575? See also :Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Daniel575. Please reply ASAP and explain why not and how you are different. Thank you, IZAK 11:59, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think your issue in sockpupetry is not the point here, he may be the same guy as other names but if he doesnt use it to win consensus there is no point against him. Lets talk about the facts are there anti zionist jews?! this was allready broght up to a vote and consenuss had it against user IZAK, we cannot ignore this fact there are thousends of jews opposing the state of isreal. does this rewqwire a category in itsef, that is the qwestion here, i think since this is an under populated category it has no merit and user eidah should play by the rules of not reverting without taking and stop calling names.--יודל 14:23, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Um יודל: did you fail to notice that the vote resulted in "no consensus"?  And as for Eidah it is very obvious by now that he plays by no rules accept his own and therefore he should not be given the benefit of the doubt to insult and bully. IZAK 15:02, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yossiea: Oh, so then there is one law for Eidah and one for the rest of the world? Maybe Y should also be blocked for aiding and abbeting a known sockpuppet and cyber-terrorist on Wikipedia. IZAK 15:06, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It looks like it. As for Y, if you look at one of Daniel's earlier blockings, he has admitted to speaking with Daniel offline and knowing that he is a sockpuppet. I don't know what to do when an admin abuses his privileges, but I believe he has a link where he supposedly will go back to RFA if enough people request it. Here is how he lays it out: User:Y/Accountability Yossiea (talk) 15:25, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am aware that is user is a reincarnation of Daniel. It's not exactly a shock to anyone. Everybody knows. However, I have done literally nothing to protect his user, not as a user, and certainly not with my administrative privileges!! If you would like to submit a recall petition, you may do so. It will be fun, actually. As for running around revealing what I attempted to conceal, you have my intense contempt, and you have committed a grievous aveirah bein odom lechaveiro, for which you will have to answer in two weeks. -- Y not? 20:03, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question for Eidah: are you blocked User:Daniel575?
Talk:Close Combat III: The Russian Front

message: Hey JimmyBlackwing, I tried bringing this one back, but it was reverted. Do you have anything else to help with it? 2600:1700:E820:1BA0:F547:54CF:BB57:887D (talk) 22:52, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I have made this article class Stub, as it is in need of extra material. With Thanks - Lee Vilenski(talk) 12:14, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance & Class
Talk:Brigandine (video game)

message: I notice that Brigandine is not listed under the Wikipedia pages for any of the three voice actors listed.  Can someone confirm the voice actors and, if they can be confirmed, add this game to their pages?  Thank you.  Kilyle (talk) 15:06, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Voice Acting
Talk:SilentHeroes

message: This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... Fairly well sourced (if small) article. Nominator is a new account who has ONLY nominated articles for deletion. --DP76764 (Talk) 19:44, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:Yaim

message: I removed the table because it was totally screwing things up here 209.146.241.93 14:43, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Early comments

message: Our style guidelines clearly say Wikipedia is not a manual so the uncited details should be removed. I also propose merge into gLite. Is there any source that mentions this independently? Actually the main web page seems to just mention EGEE which is defunct, so not sure exactly. But needs trimming and citing anyway. W Nowicki (talk) 20:40, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:List of rivers of Quebec

message: Please help me add Aux Rochers River to the list. Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:06, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I gave it my best shot.  The Aux Rochers empties into the St. Lawrence quite far downstream, so it seems to fit best under "North shore downstream of Trois-Rivières".  PKT(alk) 18:02, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aux Rochers River
Talk:Aspire Dome

message: Holy shite, this article seems to be written as an advertisement for the academy...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.82.224.36 (talk) 17:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias

message: It now has enough references and is not written in a commercial tone, however, I think that while it is undoubtedly a notable sporting venue, its a notability as a sports academy needs to be further verified. Elspamo4 (talk) 03:01, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article tags 
Talk:Bloodlines in Vampire: the Masquerade

message: Just want to point out that the origin of the Daughters of Cacophany is still in dispute. Proposed origins include Malkavian, Toreador and Baali. No official source has stated the spurce of the bloodline.
Cameronmurtagh 14:47, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Role-playing games#Category:Vampire: The Masquerade where a discussion is occurring about merging pages in this category.  --Craw-daddy | T | 12:39, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: Clans & Bloodlines in Vampire: The Masquerade  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flygongengar (talk • contribs) 04:45, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Merged with Clans Article
Talk:552nd Air Control Wing

message: I do not see any issue of NPOV here.  This article needs a lot of work, but I don't see problems with POV.
BWH76 (talk) 17:50, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV dispute

message: The Flight Line Cafe, just outside the operations area, has the best grilled hamburgers I have ever eaten. :-) Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 03:15, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: The afd discussion predates the articles current name; it can be found here. TomStar81 (Talk) 06:49, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Afd Discussion

message: Airplanes are what they do. Rcbutcher (talk) 11:55, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs list of aircraft operated

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 552d Air Control Wing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-070517-082.pdf
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 21:18, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Pfannenstiel incision

message: Really what Wikipedia should have is a main article titled "Surgical incision", discussing incisions generally, and then having subheadings for the many types of incisions. The content of this article would then be moved to the subheading "Pfannenstiel incision" in that article, and this article would redirect to there. However, there is no way that I have time to implement the plan above, so this article will suffice as-is till someone can do that. — Lumbercutter 14:53, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Content is overly forked, but that's OK for now
Talk:Prince Claus Fund

message: I am not sure it is appropriate to call the article Prince Claus Awards; the awards are one of the activities of the Prince Claus Fund. I have the impression that it would be best to call the article Prince Claus Fund and to make a redirect from Prince Claus Awards towards Prince Claus Fund. The Prince Claus Fund is a major funding body in the Netherlands with a specific focus on Africa, Asia and Latin America and it represent an important stakeholder at an international level. I think it would deserve an article, not only related to its award (which is certainly important but not the only thing the organisation does). --Iopensa (talk) 10:29, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]