lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Allen Jones (artist)

message: Some reports of feminist criticisms of his work, with sources, would be good to have here. -- Karada 09:14, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Laura Mulvey has written a critique of Allen Jones' work (in particular reference to his 'Furniture').
In her 1973 essay titled "Fears, Fantasies and the Male Unconscious or 'You Don't Know What's Happening, Do You Mr. Jones?'" -- from British feminist magazine Spare Rib; She discussed Jones' images in relation to fetishism in the stictly Freudian sense. She suggested that his work is not about women as such. Rather it might represent Jones' own male fears.  She suggests that Jones has reproduced "Woman" as spectacle and her primary function as a sexual being; and as the object of a specifically masculine gaze/desire.
What I would personally be interested in is seeing not so much feminist views on Allen Jones - but post feminist theories that might have a more positive reading of his work.
--Dadasurealism 07:52, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laura Mulvey 

message: Allen Jones was also painting a lot!  77.196.107.253 (talk) 13:05, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paintings 
Talk:Chronology of Jesus

message: In the first sentence of the Scholarly Debate section, I am removing the second part of the sentence (bold)
 The estimation of the hour of the death of Jesus based on the New Testament accounts has been the subject of debate among scholars for centuries, since there was a clear contradiction between the accounts in the Synoptic Gospels and that in the Gospel of John.[156] 
This statement is factually wrong and disagrees with the source cited further above which states
all four Gospels agree that Jesus died a few hours before the commencement of the Jewish Sabbath, i.e. he died before nightfall on a Friday (Matt 27:62; 28:1; Mark 15:42; Luke 23:54; John 19:31, 42).
I speculate that some Wikipedia editor wanted to say that the date of Jesus' death appears discrepant in the gospels (Nisan 14 vs Nisan 15), but then confused it with the hour of Jesus' death where there is no discrepancy. But since I cannot be certain what the editor had in mind, it is best to delete the mistake and then hope the editor will return to this sentence and rewrite it correctly. 31.49.196.235 (talk) 09:52, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Death' is final. Rabbi Jesus son of Joseph miraculously survived his Crucifixion - the Messiah/Christ had a near-death experience. 2603:3020:BF5:4000:90C:BE82:69D0:3A2C (talk) 16:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hour of Death - contradiction or not? 

message: I searched the book on Google, it does not seem to exist. No luck either for the names of the author + the word Bible. tgeorgescu (talk)  06:25, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What’s wrong with you 24.101.252.203 (talk) 20:35, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not RS 

message: An icon is shown at the top of this article, with a caption indicating that it's an icon of the life of Christ. In fact, it's an icon of the Church of Christ -- as can be seen from the Slavonic title at the top of the icon and the English name of the jpeg file itself. The vignettes within the icon appear to show events in the lives of important saints, including several who were crucified upside down. Christ was of course not crucified upside down or multiple times. The resolution of the image is unfortunately too low to read the Slavonic captions on the vignettes. Bottom line, it's a fine icon, but clearly doesn't depict the life of Christ. I would suggest replacing it with the following file: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cycle_of_icons_depicting_the_life_of_Jesus,_Arkhangelsk.jpg Ps8v9 (talk) 01:55, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed on the old one, which has been there for years. I have replaced it with a large multi-scene Passion which expand very well. Johnbod (talk) 02:14, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent, thank you! Ps8v9 (talk) 02:20, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

text: does everyone miss Jesus 24.101.252.203 (talk) 20:35, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: is everyone jealous by Jesus 24.101.252.203 (talk) 20:36, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The icon shown does not depict the life of Christ
Talk:O (German magazine)

message: The article was moved from «O» to O (German magazine) on the grounds that German quotation marks are not part of the title.  However, at the reference in the article there is an image of a magazine cover which shows clearly that the title includes the guillemets.  In fact these are French quotation marks, presumably alluding to the French-langage Histoire d'O after which the magazine was apparently named.  When they are used in German they are reversed: »O«.  However German quotation marks are more commonly: „O“.  So there are two reasons to believe that the marks are part of the title.  I suggest that the original title was correct and propose to reverse the move.  Rhomb (talk) 12:30, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right indeed. My mistake. — The Man in Question (in question) 05:29, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem, thanks for reverting the move.  Rhomb (talk) 17:21, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: See this item for sale on ebay
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=160639109019  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.105.60.169 (talk) 07:59, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last issue seems to be at least #28  

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Adumbrativus (talk) 05:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: «O» →  – or  per MOS:TM. We shouldn't try to imitate logos, but rather should look to independent reliable sources written in English. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 04:27, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 December 2023
Talk:Kristiansund

message: It seems to me that UK English would be more appropriate for the topic. Any opinions/comments? -- Olve 10:12, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, could be. I think it was me who recently made the article consistently US E., mostly just to keep things -eh- consistent. IMO, whatever E. variant will do. Generally I wouldn't say geographical location should determine this, but perhaps our being part of Europe (heh -- more or less, I guess) makes UK E. the most fitting choice? --Wernher 15:47, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't thinking of Kristiansund's general location in Europe as much as local culture of the Kristiansund area. There are strong links to the UK (esp. England and Scotland) and a high number (I don't have exact statistics) of British immigrants occupy important positions in the local cultural life. Anyway — since you don't seem to object to the idea, I will start UKify the language now. :-) -- Olve 16:51, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. BTW (OT), tnx for joining the 'NorWikipedian'-list -- we're now 2 more than the Swedes. :-) --Wernher 17:59, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  US or UK English? 
Talk:Charles Bridgeman

message: I removed "Landscape Architect" in the opening because this late 19th century term in anachronistic. All I did was wikify it. Wetman 10:22, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Reynold Cobham, 1st Baron Cobham of Sterborough

message: The Cobham Family:
Even reputable authorites on nobility have made careless errors concerning this comlicated family:
Afew notes to begin with have been placed here because they do not seem suitable for the page attached, for now at least Faedra 11:45, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shoplifting

message: Shoplifters are strong 82.82.241.216 (talk) 21:29, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shoplifting 

message: In some states, a Shoplifting offense involving a person who has been previously banned from a retail establishment can be charged with felony Burglary. So, in some instances it is not considered different than Burglary, as stated in the entry. 75.130.74.50 (talk) 12:27, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legal Classification of Shoplifting 

message: These are two different sections discussing the same thing.  Valgrus Thunderaxe (talk) 20:38, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No objection thus far.  I'm going to remove the "Retail bag check exit policy" section as it's redundant and also riddled with grammatical errors and manager-like speak.  Valgrus Thunderaxe (talk) 00:42, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exit inspections / Retail bag check exit policy 

message: The notable cases section strikes me as mostly trivia, and neither necessary to the article nor helpful to understanding shoplifting. Also, there is no apparent measure of what makes a case noteworthy beyond whether the person involved is famous, a criterion that of itself seems to either make for an arbitrarily selected short list of incidents or an extremely long list. Arllaw (talk) 04:45, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Are there any thoughts on this proposal? Arllaw (talk) 00:37, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I think any "notable cases" should be described only if they are remarkable and noteworthy instances of the crime, not otherwise unremarkable instances of the crime that are notable because the perpetrator was famous. Nothing here qualifies. WP Ludicer (talk) 01:12, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:   I totally agree. this should have been removed long ago. JBW (talk) 19:00, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Thanks. I have taken the liberty of removing the section. Arllaw (talk) 22:38, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal: Remove Notable Cases Section
Talk:Jacques-Alexandre Laffon de Ladebat

message: I'm no 18c scholar, but by profession I'm a French translator, so I translated it. (Several spelling errors in the original, by the way.) But the article is listed under one man, to switch almost immediately to talk mostly about his son; and no source is given: despite the errors/typos in the original transcription, it may be copyrighted material; if so, the fact of having it translated doesn't make it any the less a copyvio. -- Bill 12:24, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Brunost/Archive 1

message: Geitost is a sub-genre of brunost. Why is brunost redirected here? The english word for :nn:Geitost is Chèvre cheese, which has little to do with brunost. This article is about brunost, not geitost. --Tannkremen 00:01, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree Acidburn24m 01:42, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, I definitely agree too, brunost (brown cheese) is the superior category, while geitost is a type of brunost. Who came up with this nonsense? I hope no Norwegian? Anyway, the article should be called either brunost or brown cheese. Oh and by the way, comparing this article to the Norwegian one I find lots of inconsistencies and what I'm guessing are plain errors too. Someone should take a look at the Norwegian article and clean up the English one. Jonmagne 04:34, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Geitost??
Talk:British Armed Forces

message: It would be nice if Wikipedia had an article given over to Exercise Steppe Eagle. 31.52.255.111 (talk) 21:05, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest that you start the article in your sandbox, and add some references so that other editors can help you write the article. Adding reliable sources will help determine if the topic is notable enough for an article. Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 08:56, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exercise Steppe Eagle 

message: This article could have a short section summarising the different cadet forces of the UK. Should it have one? --Dreddmoto (talk) 21:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: They are not a part of the British Armed forces. If they are, and when/if become one day branch of the armed forces can be added one short section summarising them. 109.93.121.223 (talk) 20:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cadets 

message: In the infobox, the Royal Navy (linked as shown) is listed as a service branch. Would it be more accurate to list HM Naval Service as the service branch or would this cause confusion. AWN08 (talk) 11:11, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox Royal Navy vs Naval Service
Talk:Freedom of worship

message: A lot of this article seems POV (maybe it's just the phrasing of the examples) --Jacobolus 03:17, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: "Freedom of worship" is the second of Four Freedoms outlined in the 1941 State of the Union address. Quite often writers who have not actually read the Four Freedoms address make the mistake of calling it "freedom of religion". Roosevelt made it quite plain that he was discussing the "worship of God", he was not discussing theology or religious doctines. He said that every person had the right to worship God in his own way, everywhere in the world. The discussion of freedom of religion is a theological matter involving doctrines. Worship of God by anyone in their own way says nothing about the intervention of others (rabbis, priests, ministers, etc.), it merely states that freedom of worship is an individual matter of choice and that essentially it is not the place of other people to dictate how a person chooses to worship God. Worship involves physical action versus mere thought or discussion about ideas. If you can find a better way of stating all of the above - go for it. MPLX/MH 20:16, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV
Talk:Arsk

message: See the official list of Tatarstan towns and regions at 
http://www.tatar.ru/index.php?node_id=791
The list is in English. --Gene s 13:24, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi!
I'd  seen this list, but I'm sure, that this list is full of mistakes. No.. I'm not sure, I know it! Naberezh nye Chelny are not Nabereznye Chelny! Tetyushi are not Tetushi! Someone (as me) translated this list, doing Indian work. (m.b. it was the programmer, build this site). 
Need more comments? Ask to User:Ezhiki about this problem.
User:Untifler--217.30.248.248 14:33, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: You are referring to minor typos as opposed to your completely different and unrecognizable town names. Typos are easy to correct. Your town names are completely unknown. --Gene s 15:02, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk
Talk:North Fork Toutle River

message: Ideally, this page should be a redirect to Toutle River, but at this time that page doesn't exist.  For now, I fixed this page, and will make it one of my todo items to work on Toutle River if someone else doesn't get to it first.  -- Kaszeta 13:26, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Affiliate (commerce)

message: I removed the list of "adult affiliate networks". There is no such thing. Most adult sites have affiliate programs but they are not generic affiliate networks. Peterkoning 03:40, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You will be surprised, but there are already Networks like that. At least one I know of and stumbled across when I was researching something. Its called Totemcash.com. Look for yourself. Anyway, you are right, it does certainly not belong in here. --Roy-SAC 05:22, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed links to adult web sites 

message: This sentence "Beside this, the most proficous industry that has proven greater advantage of the affiliate system, can be traced in the Hotel and Travel Industry, where the concept of affiliate is accessory to the enlargement and empowerment of the affiliated primary product" is poorly written and does not seem to belong under the e-commerce heading. Please rework it. Verne Equinox 22:59, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: E-commerce

message: Having "Affiliate Networks" as a chapter for "Affiliate" is very weak. Affiliate Networks should be its own Article. I would even go further and create individual Articles for the different type of Affiliate Networks since the whole industry diversified a lot. I am sure that I could get a bunch of people to contribute to those articles. What you will probably have to accept are external Links to the Networks or as alternative allow the creation of Articles about each Network. I believe a mix of the two would be appropriate. I can't find the link to request a new article (as stated here Requested Articles - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Requested_articles) --Roy-SAC 05:18, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It DOES have now its own article, so corrected . Markerdryer (talk) 18:03, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make Affiliate Networks its own Article
Category talk:Articles that need to be wikified

message: Instead of having a guide on how to Wikify the pages, could we just link to WikiProject Wikify instead, where the steps to Wikifying the pages are more in-depth? If there's no response in the next twenty-four hours I'll just change it and see what happens. Voyaging (talk) 05:19, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. The explanatory information seems to be a remnant of when this category page was the collaborative hub of the wikification drive, before the WikiProject started up. Some of the discussions on this talk page should probably be archived as well, namely those posted prior to the WikiProject being set up. Cheers. – Liveste (talk • edits) 00:01, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Talk page archived. I've added an explanatory note above. Cheers. – Liveste (talk • edits) 06:40, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linking to [[WP:WikiProject Wikify|WikiProject Wikify]] 

message: Since Wikification is a kind of cleanup, I added this category to . If you disagree, feel free to revert. --B. Wolterding (talk) 17:06, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorization 

message: Where has the total amounts gone on each month that tells you how many pages are to be wikified? Katsp8 (talk) 18:57, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amounts on Sub Catogories 

message: It's true. See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28dates_and_numbers%29#Date_autoformatting. Editors should consider the disadvantages of applying MediaWiki's autoformatting before doing so. The alternative is to remove it from an article where it is applied inconsistently. TONY (talk) 03:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date autoformatting is no longer encouraged 

message: this doesn't seem to belong in the backlog category, as it's not 1 year or 10,000 articles backlogged? --Dak (talk) 20:20, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I see no articles at all here. -- Laura S | talk to me 13:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They are in the sub-categories. Rich Farmbrough, 19:33, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  backlog? 

message: It is a total mixture of topics - when most of us are interested in particular areas (and do not have the inclination to trawl through several thousand entries for things we wish to take on). Jackiespeel (talk) 17:27, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: The main problem with the list

message: This page should not be speedily deleted because... (just because it's empty now, that doesn't mean it always will be...better to save it than have to recreate it later) --WQUlrich (talk) 19:56, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:Person having ordinary skill in the art

message: What's the point of the hammer analogy? I find it confusing and unencyclopedic. It is just trying to say that PHOSITA is a concept that is used in many countries and gets the job done? Or is it actually about patenting hammers? Is it necessary? Can it be reworded or clarified? Generally I don't think extended analogy is really very encyclopedic, or often very clear... --Fastfission 04:15, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I was thinking about the song and got carried away. Now how about some nails? Ha! -- Toytoy 04:56, Oct 6, 2004 (UTC)
An example (or two or three) would definitely help me to get my mind around this concept. Aranel ("Sarah") 16:46, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: If I had a hammer, I'd.. uh.. what?

message: called this person a nerd with reference to UK [2004] EWCA Civ 281. The following two articles by Bernard CORBOZ and Graham ASHLEY might be of interest for Swiss and EPO term definitions. --Swen (talk) 13:20, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  LJ Jacob coined it [[nerd]]
Talk:Greg Raymer

message: Whoops.  You're right, when I put the estimated age, I just subtracted wrong.  He was/is 39.  CryptoDerk 16:39, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)
Greg Raymer was born in 1964. He says so on his own website (http://www.fossilmanpoker.com/faqs.htm #1). I edited the entry with this correction.
I removed this line: "In 2005 he appeared on the chat show Heads Up with Richard Herring to discuss his life, career and his love of poker." At best, it's not very interesting--he's been on a lot of talk shows--and at worst, it's just a commercial for this Richard Herring person. Lord Geznikor 13:57, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment 

message: Im new here , What can I edit here ? external links ? Somebody told me have fun editing...what that now means. Sorry for my english but what can I help you with ? Patrick Seget 07:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Post it here on this page.  Other editors will then review it and make comments. ♣♦ SmartGuy ♥♠ 13:47, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  EDIT 

message: Non-main event cashes aren't notable enough to put in an article. The "personal life" section was hardly that; it was more of a trivia section. Feel free to message me if I've deleted something you consider to be noteworthy.
Also, I need somebody else to sort the references 'cos I suck at them. JaeDyWolf (talk) 15:05, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latest edit 

message: The quote, "No player since Johnny Chan had come so close to repeating as a World Series champion.", seems to be incorrect because Dan Harrington reached 17th place in 1996 after winning it in 1995.  Am I wrong?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.62.167.71 (talk) 05:32, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: After winning in 1987 and 1988, Johnny Chan came runner-up in 1989 to Phil Hellmuth. So if Dan Harrington did better than that in 1996 then he WOULD have repeated! JaeDyWolf ~ Baka-San (talk) 10:57, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Read the quote again.  I stand by my question.  (Hint:  this quote was about Greg Raymer coming so close... since Johnny Chan?)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.62.167.71 (talk) 05:32, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

text: That quote probably should be revised to:  "Other than Dan Harrington in 1996, no player since Johnny Chan had come so close to repeating as a World Series champion."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.62.167.71 (talk) 05:55, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I see what you mean and I agree. JaeDyWolf ~ Baka-San (talk) 06:42, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poker section