lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Toni Mannix

message: Is there any evidence he killed her on an opne road in a so called car staged car crash on a high road speed chase? Did police bother to even question him?
You cant just crash on open road, she was in no hurry!
__
What the heck are you talking about?
She died of Alzheimer's--no car crash was involved whatsoever.
Not to mention that he died years before she did.
So, I guess to answer your questions:
1) No, no evidence at all, whatsoever.
2) No, police don't usually hold a seance during investigations. 24.14.224.157 (talk) 21:33, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The questioner is thinking of his first wife. 2804:18:8BE:ACE5:F0CE:27EC:9C7D:7646 (talk) 11:11, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Toni's Husband hubby Eddie Mannix

message: Material from IMDb was added, in violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies, in one piece on 20:40, 30 December 2005. This material was identical to the IMDb profile, but alterations were made two minutes later that differ. It is credible to presume that the material existed first at IMDb, as anyone copying this to IMDb would have had to do so within that two minute window or go back to an earlier version in history. The material has been removed or rewritten where significant copyright infringement continued to exist. Editors are free to revise or rewrite in their own words, but this material must not be restored. While Wikipedians may use external sites as a source of ideas, they may not use them as a source of sentences, unless the material is released by a compatible license to Wikipedia. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyrighted material from IMDb

message: In the article about her lover George Reeves it is mentioned that Toni Mannix worked for and used her inheritance from him for a charity for Myasthenia Gravis but there is no mention in this bio of her. 86.182.222.246 (talk) 01:17, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charity
Talk:Vivienne de Watteville

message: I don't how to exactly put the sources in the article, maybe someone who is more experienced with this can:
Watteville, Vivienne de: Out in the Blue, London, 1927. 
Watteville, Vivienne de: Speak to the Earth, London, 1937.
Hartmann, Lukas: Die Tochter des Jägers, Zurich, 2002. (isbn: 3-312-00292-3)[this is a novel about Watteville]  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.178.107.210 (talk) 13:35:25, August 19, 2007 (UTC) 
:Added, though these should be backed up by third party sources. Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 15:56, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources 

message: I recently read John Seerey-Lester's book which probably steals directly from V.de Watteville's actual books/stories.  I felt that having context behind how her father died, etc, would provide insight into the person that she was.  The perspective is far from neutral and is closer to story telling - but I tried to write in encyclopaedic format  Please patch it up appropriately.  Regards, Warren Fish (talk) 01:46, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added story
Talk:Will Hunt

message: Is there a way we can add a "Not to be confused with Will "Science" Hunt." hatnote at the top of the article even though that article does not exist?  I've added a "for other persons..." template for now.  Unless that's really all we need...  ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 00:01, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Will "Science" Hunt 

message: Guys you left out the thing that Will was best known for around the southeast. In fact one of the early bands he played with was a band that went by the name of 'Eli', and he was well known all around the southeast for doing his drum solo with flaming sticks. I can't give you exact dates nor how long he was with that band, but it was early 90s. 74.254.150.5 (talk) 20:16, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Will's earlier band....
Talk:Willie Coffey

message: For the record, I would contend that the criticisms of Willie Coffey are notable as it is fairly unprecedented to face calls to apologise to an expert witness called to a Holyrood committee. Moreover this incident is also related to several issues of importance during the Scottish referendum. 
The incident certainly appears to be more notable than his campaigns around the Scottish Whiskey industry which is only supported by one reference to his own blog and one to a local newspaper. However I don't have time to argue the case here so I will accept the consensus. Enlightened editor (talk) 13:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversion of my Changes
Talk:Astoria

message: That's quite a long list of the different versions of the name Astoria, but none seem to explain the etymology of the name. Who can? --Thus Spake Anittas 22:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Astoria is also the name of an edgar allen poe short story.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.195.36.133 (talk) 20:04, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  edgar allen poe 

message: The city of Astoria, Oregon was named after John Jacob Astor  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.195.36.133 (talk) 20:09, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  etymology 
Talk:The Viking Queen

message: This sounds like its based on the celtic uprising against Rome under Queen Boudica... -- Imladros (talk) 06:19, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, except that Boudica's rebellion took place several hundred years before  Justinian's time.  And the Vikings were several hundred years  AFTER Justinian.  What a mess. 73.137.170.88 (talk) 17:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basis
Talk:Forro Creole

message: In Those mixed-raced that did not have the status of Portuguese, darker skin, often gained a "forro" declaration; because their Portuguese fathers did not want to enslave their children., the relationship of darker skin is unclear.  It could mean:
*or darker skin
*because of darker skin
*something else?
If it is worth mentioning, it is probably worth getting right.  Unfortunately or and because of seem antithetical in this context.
O'RyanW (☺  ₪) 22:20, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Not)understood syntax 
Talk:Saint Paul Public Schools

message: Undid Mandsford insertions since a 22 year old news story about a dictator's name spelling is not relative to the article. Dinkytown (talk) 05:49, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverted article back to Siebrand as recent insertion not relative to the article

message: * Spanish
* Hmong
* Somali
* Karen: http://www.spps.org/karen.html
WhisperToMe (talk) 19:17, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Languages
Talk:Underwater tunnel

message: I have greatly improved this page (IMO) from the few lines it was.
(Frediculous biggs 15:51, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Each comparison also applies to other than undersea tunnels, so why not just let the general tunnel article, which is also better organised, do it all? Jim.henderson (talk) 22:31, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparisons 

message: Immersed tube and Submerged floating tunnel), different kinds of underwater tunnels, should be mentioned here. 184.166.6.102 (talk) 05:31, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Types of tunnels 

message: I suggest we make the list into a sortable table, showing parameters such as length, depth, underwater length, price, road/rail/both, flag and such. See List of offshore wind farms for an example. TGCP (talk) 17:13, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table of data 

message: This seems like a nonsensical argument- how is a downward slope producing less carbon than an upward slope for a bridge? What matters is the relative change in vehicle height- not whether they go down then up vs. up then down. This should be removed I think- it's not an actual benefit. []  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markbowen303 (talk • contribs) 16:24, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Downward slope has less carbon footprint?
Talk:Levey–Jennings chart

message: Try searching under "Levy-Jennings".  The proper spelling does not have the extra "e".
:Actually, it DOES. It is used and written with an extra 'e' at our lab and in our literature (US and UK), though. Dr. F.C. Turner - [USERPAGE|USERTALK] -  13:12, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

message: removed from article "
Correction: The Levey-Jennings chart is NOT the same as the Shewhart Individuals chart. The Levey-Jennings chart uses the long-term (i.e., population) estimate of sigma whereas the Shewhart chart uses the short-term (i.e., within the rational subgroup) estimate. Dr. John Flaig".  I slightly changed what was said in response, but something better is needed. Melcombe (talk) 13:32, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have copied this in, with minor changes. I am not sure that "rational subgroup" has an obvious meaning here. Do make your own changes to the article, but not marked as "correction" as before ...just as part of the article. Melcombe (talk) 10:38, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed comment
Talk:Northridge High School (Dayton, Ohio)

message: The list of hall of fame inductees seems to have little relation to the website referenced. Either a sub-page of the site should be referenced which lists previous hall of fame inductees or this list should be trimmed down to people notable by having Wikipedia articles or supported by other citations. Fæ (talk) 08:43, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been more than a year without comment or resolution. I propose to remove this list unless there are policy-based objections. --Fæ (talk) 07:54, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://www.northridgealumni.org
Talk:Mahzarin Banaji

message: I deleted the controversy section.  It is true that there are genuine academic disagreements as to the meaning and interpretation of Banaji's research. But that is true of any area of scientific research.  The section I removed gave no specifics and provided no supporting citations, and so seemed to me to violated NPOV.  If someone wants to expand with details of the controversies and their implications, it would be a welcome improvement to the article. SlipperyN 22:36, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of Controversy section

message: Most of the article appears to be a copy of Banaji's profile on socialpsychology.org. Or is the external site is copying from Wikipedia? --Sonicyouth86 (talk) 12:28, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problems 
Talk:12th Illinois Infantry Regiment

message: It looks like 12th Illinois Infantry Regiment (3 Year) and 12th Illinois Infantry Regiment are the same unit, separated by enlistment period, with the "3 month" article at the base name, even though the 3 year period is undoubtedly the primary topic if we are to have multiple articles. There are no hatnotes or links between them so the situation is untenable. Many analogous Illinois regiments already include the 3 month and 3 year period in one article (e.g. the 11th and 9th) or have been proposed for merging (e.g. the 7th, 8th, 10th). Having multiple, improperly disambiguated articles for different time periods of the same entity is confusing, and should be merged together. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:03, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Tubular neighborhood

message: Isn't there a theorem that asserts that tubular neighbourhoods always exist?  I'd add it myself, but I'm not sure of the exact hypotheses needed. --345Kai (talk) 18:27, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about the tubular neighbourhood theorem? 

message: is :File:Tubular neighborhood3.png really a tubular neighborhood? The red lines there aren't normals unlike in say :File:Tubular neighborhood2.png. In 2D geometry a simple translation of a (progenitor) curve does not, in general, produce a curve parallel to its progenitor (except in trivial cases like translating a line). JMP EAX (talk) 04:56, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd image 

message: I have removed the warning at the top of the lead which says the article [may be] "too confusing." Given the obscurity of the topic, it is not overly technical, and any interested parties should have a relatively intuitive understanding of it as is presented. Additionally, considering this objection is nearly a decade old, it has been removed. SpiralSource (talk) 02:36, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too confusing: assessment
Talk:Sacred Mountains of China

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for Heng Shan Mtn in Shanxi Province China. Actual coordinates are; 39°40’23.38”N, 113°44’08.00”E
—86.164.155.93 (talk) 15:35, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: . Deor (talk) 11:17, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: Section 3 lists four Taoist mountains in addition to the five listed in the first section. With some reason, somebody put a tag on that section, saying that it may stray too far from the article topic. Does anyone know why these mountains are included here? Are they, perhaps, included on some official or traditional list of sacred mountains that includes more than just the five Taoist and four Buddhist mountains that are described in the lead? There are also the "other famous Taoist mountains" listed in section 3.5, and Mount Lu, listed in the See also section.
If there are mountains in China, other than the five and four mentioned in the lead, that are specifically designated as "sacred mountains" (as opposed to being just mountains with temples on them), perhaps the third section should list all of them. The lead section, and the scope of the article, would have to be adjusted to include those other mountains. If, on the other hand, the term "Sacred Mountains of China" really does refer exclusively to the five Taoist and four Buddhist mountains, these others should be removed. A. Parrot (talk) 21:06, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Off-topic tag for "Four Taoist mountains" 

message: The Sacred Mountains of China are divided into several groups. The Five Great Mountains (simplified Chinese: 五岳; traditional Chinese: 五嶽; pinyin: Wǔyuè) refers to five of the most renowned mountains in Chinese history,[1] and they were the subjects of imperial pilgrimage by emperors throughout ages. They are associated with the supreme God of Heaven and the five main cosmic deities of Chinese traditional religion. The group associated with Buddhism is referred to as the Four Sacred Mountains of Buddhism (四大佛教名山; Sì dà fójiào míngshān), and the group associated with Taoism is referred to as the Four Sacred Mountains of Taoism (四大道教名山; Sì dà dàojiào míngshān). 82.137.117.14 (talk) 17:04, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idk 

message: I think those with some more knowledge on these mountains' history and cultural roles should edit this page. It feels incomplete in places. GoutComplex (talk) 21:08, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs some overhauling with the descriptions
Talk:MetLife

message: In the MetLife information snippet, under "Key people," can you please delete Steven A. Kandarian as "President, Chairman & CEO,"  and add Michel A. Khalaf as "President & CEO" and Glenn Hubbard as "Chairman"
?
Duncan at MetLife (talk) 14:42, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Rlendog (talk) 18:40, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change name of MetLife President/CEO to Michel A. Khalaf, and change name of MetLife Chairman to Glenn Hubbard 

message: I am surprised that this is missing completely.
MetLife played a central role in covering up the deadly risks associated with asbestos.
https://www.asbestos.com/featured-stories/cover-up/
"While Metropolitan Life Insurance Company was not an asbestos business, it worked closely with asbestos companies to conceal the health effects of the toxic mineral. In 1944, the company insured more than a dozen big names in the industry, including Johns Manville, Raybestos-Manhattan, National Gypsum, Fibreboard and Flintkote.
Asbestos Pit Miners
Early image of an open pit asbestos mining operation.
Metropolitan Life knew about the high asbestosis rates at Johns Manville’s factory in Manville, New Jersey, as early as 1932, but succeeded in blocking an inspection for poor work conditions there in 1945. The company even convinced government officials that asbestos hazards were under control, despite having knowledge of confidential company-sponsored reports that found evidence of asbestosis in 20 percent of workers.
In 1933, a plant physician at a Johns Manville plant in Illinois asked Dr. Anthony Lanza, a full-time employee at Metropolitan Life from 1926 to 1948, about hanging warning posters to spread worker awareness of asbestos-related health risks. Lanza objected because of the potential “legal situation.”
Lanza’s early 1930s study on asbestos workers in the textile industry revealed that half of all workers with five to 10 years of exposure showed signs of asbestosis in X-rays. Of those with more than 15 years of exposure, a remarkable 87 percent suffered from lung disease. The asbestos industry blocked the publication of these findings for four years, and likely altered the data before the report was released." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.67.41.85 (talk) 15:29, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asbestos Coverup controversy 

message: The article says "MetLife licensed Snoopy and other Peanuts characters for promotional purposes from the Iconix Brand Group", but that was only true for the last few years of the license. Iconix acquired Peanuts rights in 2010. Prior to that, the license would've been from United Media.
I will not be making any correction as I have a conflict of interest on matters related to Peanuts. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 19:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  the licensing of Peanuts
Talk:Queen's Harvest

message: I probably should have posted my concern on the talk page initially, but I was confused by the quote: "clear and detailed discussion and organization of the defenders' tactics and motives includes the potential for sowing discord among defenders".  Particularly, I was confused about the phrase "discussion and organization of the defenders' tactics".  It seems to say organizing the defenders tactics includes sowing discord, which doesn't make sense. How does one organize discord? I thought it was a typo or misquote. —<B>Torchiest</B> talkedits 04:59, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a copy/paste straight from the PDF to make sure I have it right - "The clear and detailed discussion and organization of the defenders' tactics and motives includes the potential for sowing discord among defenders." The "discussion [...] of the defenders' tactics and motives" seems pretty clear and straightforward. So changing the word to "organization" makes it less clear, and requires some interpretation. Does he mean, how the tactics are organized, or how the defenders are organized, or how well the information is presented... I am not sure, but I think the latter is probably right since it fits in better with "discussion of", but YMMV. 24.12.74.21 (talk) 08:30, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, that finally just clicked for me.  It's a really convoluted sentence.  I think I may try rewriting/paraphrasing it to make it more comprehensible. —<B>Torchiest</B> talkedits 21:03, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification question
Talk:Cat Soup

message: An attempt of an interpretation could be added, maybe?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Exizt (talk • contribs) 18:12, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interpretation 

message: Hi, I'm researching this film and its wiki and I'd like to talk with the contributors of this wiki. Can you please email me? My email is ciscaucasusxabarnama@gmail.com. Thank you; and good night. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.134.252.62 (talk • contribs) 04:32, May 13, 2009
:Wikipedians usually prefer to discuss on-wiki. More convenient & transparent. --Gwern  (contribs) 18:18 14 May 2009 (GMT)
::How can I help with this article? —Erik (talk • contrib) 20:09, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nekojiru-sou and wiki 
Talk:University of Louisville School of Law

message: I see that citations from UofL itself were used as references for common names. I'd like to point out that these references are inadequate for this purpose.  References from independent, reliable sources are required here. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 11:42, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: How ironic.  You were the one that was referring to that same exact web page as evidence of the 'offical' name. Nyth83 (talk) 12:58, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The tagging was appropriate at the time.  The official web page is evidence of the official name. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 14:31, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations for common names in lead 
Talk:List of hospitals in Illinois

message: This list is a mess.  Many alphabetizations are wrong.  There are some double entries, in cases where one listed hospital is owned by another listed hospital system (in which cases the individual hospitals might best be listed as indents under the name of one main hospital system).   The list has not kept up with hospital renamings.  I myself do not have time to fix this right now. Acwilson9 (talk) 20:50, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more cleanup
Talk:List of Freakazoid! episodes

message: The idea of merging this article into the Freakazoid! article has been brought up. Personally, I think that this article should not be merged because it has info too specific for the article. Plus, many articles, including this featured one are separate from their series articles. If you want to merge the artcle, please discuss this below. Thanks, Gak Blimby 23:04, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging

message: Season 2 is a little out of order... 203,205,206,207,204 jt_200075 16:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Season 2
Talk:Con†Stellation

message: I've added a few references, including one to an existing history of Huntsville fandom and Con*Stellation (written circa 1996 and published online and as part of the printed "1997 Southern Fandom Confederation Handbook & History" since approximately that time).  At this point I think the Unreferenced tag could be removed.  Thoughts? Mikek999 23:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced Citations Addressed 
Talk:Parasitic twin

message: Fetus in fetu has some text that duplicates text here, or that should appear here and not on that page, since it applies to all parasitic twins, not just to fetus in fetu. Una Smith 23:09, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: note

message: Why did they murder the other being, clinically called "parasite"? Seems morally and ethically wrong to me. --83.254.141.62 forgot to sign the above.
It's a good question.  I don't know why they did it, but one possible reason is that they believe the fetus in fetu is not another being, not a twin, but a tumor that mimics a fetus. Una Smith 02:30, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In the Bodyshock documentary they showed the parents taking advice from Egypt's Grand Mufti. He said something like "When faced with two choices, both bad, we must choose the lesser of the evils". Seems quite logical and enlightened to me. 172.159.69.47 14:27, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Murder

message: It really is irritating that another would probably have to die. And I really don't like them calling the unfortunate twin a parasite. But I don't think either of them could have survived that way for very long. There would have probably been little to no hope for the unfortunate twin, but at least there would still have been at least some or more hope for the one which developed. I guess they were trying to salvage what they can from the event. --NewDreams2 forgot to sign
Host and parasite are precise technical terms, borrowed from biology, not intended in a derogatory sense. --Una Smith 17:37, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Parasite

message: Can we get some examples up there?
PhoenixSunburn (talk) 01:19, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples?