Template talk:2nd chance

message: I'd like to add a bit at the end that tells the user, once they have done this, to resubmit an unblock request.  Otherwise, there's a good chance we'll never see their proposed change.  What do you think?  --Yamla 14:55, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears I cannot read.  Ho hum.  --Yamla 02:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I would recommend adding something like, "Please indicate you understand our policies, and promise to behave." --Elonka 02:55, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Maybe it only semi protectino would be more appropriate here,  is only semi protected and that it regularly used across Wikipedia.The Sunshine Man 17:10, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Change request

message: I hate it when someone actually responds to this.  It creates big problems: for one thing, it's hard to compare their draft to the original, there aren't always diffs we can use, et cetera.  Also, it inappropriately adds user talk pages to all sorts of mainspace categories.  Plus, I have no idea what to look for, because the person who made the judgement that the user can have a second chance if they follow these instructions never (thanks to the template) gives a clear idea of why or what they're looking for.  Mangojuicetalk 05:27, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. Stifle (talk) 12:25, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a note that the page should be saved before they begin editing it, so that we can at least see the diffs of the talk page. –xenocidic (talk) 01:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I hate these 

message: It should start with "This request for unblocking" instead of "Your request for unblocking". After all, it might not be the only unblock request on the user's talk page.
: Happy‑melon 09:42, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit protected

message: Is there such a list? Gravitoweak (talk) 14:10, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ummm..... it is not there.--Ankit MaityTalkContribs 16:28, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am also curious about this. Benjamin (talk) 01:51, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: List of users who have been given a second chance and then went on to be helpful

message: The code {{helpme|your question here}} could be simplified to . Cathfolant (talk) 03:58, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The protection already is template editors. I don't understand. And sure, signature sounds good. Cathfolant (talk) 07:37, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: And you're a template editor so you could just do this. Cathfolant (talk) 07:39, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

text: Thanks. (Didn't notice the date the protection settings were changed, duh...) Cathfolant (talk) 08:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 11 January 2014 

message: Can you please change the hyperlink our basic rules from Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset to Wikipedia:Five pillars because they are the most popular summary of Wikipedia's basic rules?
Can you also change the hyperlink this index of articles needing improvement from Wikipedia:Cleanup process to Wikipedia:Articles for improvement? This link actually shows the articles needing improvement. 2601:183:101:58D0:9949:2F34:20E9:8BF6 (talk) 11:57, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: First, you're a block evader, so normally this edit request would be removed on sight. But even if you weren't, I would decline because in my opinion, the links are better like this.  L293D (☎ • ✎) 15:16, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 June 2018