lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mário Zagallo

message: His surname was spelled Zagalo until at least the 1970s. Can anyone find the reason for the change and add it to the article? Thanks. Jess Cully 12:37, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was spelled Zagalo until the 1990s, when one reporter asked him how he should spell it. The rest of the media quickly followed suit. Alex Bellos tells the story in his Futebol. Macgreco 03:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of name 

message: Hi, there is an information that Zagallo was the first person who won World Cup as a player and manager. Please verify it. It seems the first one was Franz Beckenbauer (1974, 1990). 185.13.106.203 (talk) 01:56, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Zagallo was 1958/1962 and 1970. He had both before Beckenbauer had either. Unknown Temptation (talk) 13:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Right, anon and UT. It seems funny there's only one who is now alive. 41.58.54.167 (talk) 17:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coaching Career - player & manager winning World Cup 

message: Mario Zagallo is listed as having won four World Cups with 1994 as "coordinator", not manager like in 1970. Would this be equivalent to assistant manager? I've looked around and haven't seen a picture of him with a 1994 Winner's medal. DuckhorseScaloni (talk) 13:47, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about World Cup Title as "coordinator" 

message: When looking for a source for his birth date I found that the current source in the article for his birthplace states he was born in Atalaia. However, some other sources such as this one state he was born in Maceió on 9 August 1931. Torimem (talk) 19:02, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace
Talk:Blue Movie

message: To add to the title confusion: there is now a documentary called Fuck about the word.  We need to sort this out so we can decide which of these two should have Fuck (film).  Or maybe they could be Fuck (1969 film) and Fuck (2006 film).   Also, after I made Fuck (documentary), someone else made Fuck (film) from a Redirect to Blue Movie into an article about the documentary. Cigarette 02:36, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Fuck (documentary)|Documentary]]

message: Apparently if you use "fuck" as a variable in Wolfram Alpha, it asks you if you want it to interpret it as "Blue Movie". Fun trivia fact. http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28fuck%29*1%2B1 75.142.48.182 (talk) 05:05, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Wolfram Alpha interpretation

message: Did this movie really have a $30,000,000 budget? I think for the time that $300,000 would be stretching it - so it was probably around $30,000. Can anyone confirm?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.231.159.16 (talk) 00:43, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: FWIW - Seems the film budget may have been about $3,000 - based on IMDb - hope this helps - in any case - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 04:34, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Budget

message: Article says, "It is the first adult erotic film depicting explicit sex to receive wide theatrical release in the United States." What does this mean? When I look at the Wikipedia article on wide release https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wide_release, it says, "In the American motion picture industry, a wide release (short for nationwide release) is a film playing at the same time at cinemas in most markets across the country." But I don't think Warhol's movie achieved this amount of exposure, did it? Greg Dahlen (talk) 03:15, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: - seems the film played theatrically in at least New York City, NY and Berkeley, CA at the time, according to noted references in the article - the film may have played elsewhere also - nonetheless - this might be sufficient to be notable as described, and somewhat worthy of the word "wide", since no other such film had played theatrically anywhere in the country at the time afaik - let alone on the east coast and west coast - most such films may have only played privately, and not at all theatrically, instead - hope this helps in some way - in any case - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 04:06, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does wide release mean?
Talk:Schillinger system

message: it seems the author of this article has problems with the markup - especially images are missing. If you don't feel comfortable with the syntax just point me to the location of the images and I'll do the links for you. Just answer me on my discussion page. It would be a shame for this great article to stay in this half-finished condition.
:Edit of 31 December 2005 seems to have introduced something from , a Ph.D. dissertation (see Ch.2 Overview, matching closely the Overview section). Possible copyvio issue, therefore. On the whole the article needs much work, to cut out diffuse and POV parts. Charles Matthews 11:54, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

message: (copied from main page by --128.186.53.220 (talk) 16:39, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:Kamikaze Girls

message: This page needs to be merged with the other, they are both about the film version of Shimotsuma Monogatari and it they seem to be identical. Calicore 21:30, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

message: She isnt Yanki-like and in a motorcycle gang, yanki IS a motorcycle gang  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.49.22.136 (talk) 19:12, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Yanki

message: The (now merged) Shimotsuma Monogatari (film) article had this -
:"A sequel to Novala Takemoto's first novel of Shimotsuma Monogatari was released this year."
in it's "trivia" section. I was wondering if there was anyone who cold verify this. If so, please re-add this to the trivia list. Calicore 04:51, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That was probably my trivia bit. Here is a link to the book on Amazon Japan. Its title reads "Shimotsuma Monogatari - Kan - Yankiichan to Lolitachan to Satsujin Jiken". Translated, it is "Shimotsuma Story - The End - The Yankee and the Lolita and the Murder Case."  ~ Wapiko 03:14, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sequel? 

message: From the first sentence, it looks like this article is about the original book, then less than a paragraph later in the introduction, there's a sentence phrased in a way that makes me think it's about the film only. I'm confused. Is this supposed to be about the movie, or the book? (Forgot to sign, sorry) Viralhyena (talk) 14:52, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this article about? 

message: The summary of the novel seems to deviate at times by comparing it with the film version. Sections such as "The rest of the book goes with the movie fairly well until..." should be removed/written in a different part of the wikipedia page. The comparison could be a separate part of the page and may be very interesting. By focusing the summary on the contents of the book would allow for a better reading of the novel's plot. CharlotteResearch (talk) 22:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Novel summary  
Talk:Yellow Hair 2

message: Why does "Running Blue", the name of an excellent song by the english-language band The Doors, redirect to an article about some obscure ferengi movie that isn't called "Running Blue"? This is en.wikipedia.org, not kr.wikipedia.org. MrDemeanour (talk) 14:50, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Doors
Talk:Raymond Chandler

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Spanish Blood. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 3#Spanish Blood until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 16:32, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Spanish Blood" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: It is only the rearranged screenplay where it is unsolved.
209.6.199.75 (talk) 15:43, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The chauffer's killer is perfectly clear in the book
Talk:STAR

message: hark!, felow wikipedians, lend me thy ears!  this page, STAR is just exactly the same as Star (disambiguation) and The Star I dont know how to put one of those banner things up, but i propise that this be merged with either the star, or Star (disambiguation) - Jedi of Redwall—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jedi of redwall (talk • contribs) 
:This page is for acronyms that spell STAR, not words that are like the word star or Star. If there are any acronyms on those pages, they should be on this page. — Chris53516 (Talk) 05:24, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page confusion

message: how to get to a star???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.139.42.117 (talk) 09:02, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  gaby.fahr@gmail.com
Talk:Chesapeake and Ohio 614

message: Can this article get a gallery?
Heres all the images I found that can be added to the gallery: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=Chesapeake+%26+Ohio+614&title=Special:MediaSearch&go=Go&type=image 124.190.12.234 (talk) 21:47, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery? 

message: In the data section, the Driver dimension is listed as 74 inches.  This is incorrect.  The correct diameter is 72."  I was the CMO during the 1980 restoration. Srwicker (talk) 01:53, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:42, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 August 2023 

message: We might need to add links to the ACE 3000 on C&O 614. 110.175.51.198 (talk) 04:04, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[ACE 3000]] 

message: Please change the driver diameter from 74”to 72”, the tractive effort from 66,450 to 64,280 lbs and the factor of adhesion from 4.29 to 4.44.
The C&O 614 has 72” drivers, not 74”. Steve Wickersham, the former chief mechanical officer for the 614 from 1980-1985 said so (he’s on Facebook if you’d like to confirm) and I measured the drivers myself, and they are indeed 72” in diameter. The C&O diagrams are incorrect. This means the tractive effort is 68,300 lbs at 85% cutoff, not 66,450. 614 operates at 80% cutoff, so it’s true tractive effort is 64,280 lbs (according to the tractive effort calculator on steamlocomotive.com). Please change the driver diameter from 74”to 72”, the tractive effort from 66,450 to 64,280 lbs and the factor of adhesion from 4.29 to 4.44. GreenbrierJ3A (talk) 04:59, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 February 2024
Talk:Molon Labe! (book)

message: Well, well, well. The article notes that the book was panned for having a Mary Sue main character and wooden supporting characters, yet tagger believes this reads like advertising.
Don't give up on your job yet.
:And that by a user Eagle101 no less. (Well, I coudn't resist...) But that edit was AWB assisted, so it could have been a mishap. I'm removing the tag anyway. GregorB 18:19, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drive by tagging taken to a new level 

message: This looks like a blurb to me too.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.246.216.178 (talk) 15:07, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 2010

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:11, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Pierre Fatou

message: I really think that all the stuff about making images from the mandlebrot set would be better replaced with a link.  It's nice to have a picture on a bigraphical page, but something like: "he investigated iterative processes, such as the one from which the mandlebrot set is derived.  These sequences are often used to create interesting fractal images" is more than sufficient.  TomViza 21:49, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And what about the Fatou's theorem ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.171.32.248 (talk) 21:55, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Images of the Mandelbrot set?
Talk:Italian East African lira

message: Italian East Africa was formed in 1936 and the lira was the curency from its inception. Perhaps that needs clarifying in the text but that's why I put 1936 for the commencement of this currency.Dove1950 15:56, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 1936
Talk:Peter Maffay

message: Could I please ask why so many variants to this article have been made in respect of layout and wording?  The article which was here was a direct translation of the article on de.wikipedia.org, and required no changes.  It was worded in English as a direct working of the German version.  Has there been problems with the article which I need to know about?  Thor Malmjursson (talk) 15:56, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article currently does not mention anything about his political activism nor about his opening for the Stones, which the German Wik page says was a series of catastrophes, including his being pelted with tomatoes.  Since the German Wik article has no citations for these two points, I haven't included them, but maybe someone can find some reference and then include them and other stuff.202.179.19.22 (talk) 05:53, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing info 

message: After the unification with Romania (Wallachia and Moldova), Transylvania siezed to exist. Stop writing Transylvania on modern topics; Brașov is part of the state with the same name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.98.161.128 (talk) 09:09, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transylvania doesn't exist anymore 
Talk:Isabella of France

message: I've gone through and expanded the article a bit, and fleshed out the in-line citations etc. Will no doubt need a scrub through in terms of copy-editing etc. Hchc2009 (talk) 11:05, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: The last part of this section needs to be rewritten. In particular this sencence (quoting):
"Ian Mortimer, focusing more on contemporary documents from 1327 itself, argues that Roger de Mortimer engineered a fake "escape" for Edward from Berkeley Castle, after which Edward was kept in Ireland, believing he was really evading Mortimer, before finally finding himself free, but unwelcome, after the fall of Isabella and Mortimer, when he made his way to Europe, before subsequently being buried at Gloucester." (End of quote.)
This sentence is very long and I hope someone can rewrite it to improve readability.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Urbanus Secundus (talk • contribs) 08:07, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've broken it up - hopefully it now reads better. Hchc2009 (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's better now, but the sentence is still very long. (It's been over a year so I don't know if your edit still stands.) While it's still a monster, it's at least possible to read it now. Urbanus Secundus (talk) 00:04, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The death of Edward, 1327 

message: Plucas58, I've removed the latest additions from the lead about Isabella being the High Sheriff of Cornwall for now. There are a couple of issues here:
* A minor one: the lead shouldn't contain anything that's not also in the main text. In this case, incidentally, I'd argue that the sheriff point isn't significant to be in the lead and should only be in the main text.
* The major point though is that the fact is not referenced. You'll need to explain the reliable source of where the information on this has come from (e.g. did it come from a book, or a reliable website, etc.?) There's some more information on how to do this here, but if you need any help with this, I'm very happy to assist - drop me a message either here on on my talk page. Hchc2009 (talk) 16:49, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sheriff material... 

message: Is there any documents on Isabella Cabet's and Roger Mortimer's supposed bastard son, William Knight?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.17.33.39 (talk) 01:18, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have never read anywhere that Isabella had a son by Mortimer. "William Knight" was obviously the invention of a badly-informed historical  romance writer. Oh by the way, it's Capet not Cabet.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 07:00, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree - there have been attempts to claim it, but none backed up by serious historians or documents. Hchc2009 (talk) 07:05, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: "William Knight" was in fact a real person, it's his parentage that I'm asking about. so, what you are saying, is that it is a story, not historically backed up (Is it disproved anywhere, on the other hand)? 75.19.99.139 (talk) 21:58, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isabella's son
Talk:Ruby Archer

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 22:11, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: This might well be her in California death index, born Missouri and initial A., same date of birth, died 1961
GRAY RUBY A 	01/28/1873 	 	 	F MISSOURI LOS ANGELES(70) 	 01/23/1961 	571-14-7452 	87 yrs
Gene Nygaard 17:27, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there's a who's who at gbooks that says she was married to B F Gray, so that must be her, edited article thus.John Z (talk) 09:33, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

text: A little more gbooks digging shows she was married earlier, and went by Ruby Archer Doud (Ruby Archer of KC MO was married to a Dr. Frank Doud in 1910, (and wrote books with him) and planned to live in LA, CA - too many coincidences to not be the same person.John Z (talk) 09:41, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Maybe er
Talk:List of National Medal of Science laureates

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_National_Medal_of_Science_laureates
Sidney Drell, Physical Sciences, and Lucy Shapiro, Biological Sciences, (and perhaps others) just received their medals on February 1, 2013.
These must be 2012 awards, not 2011 ???
75.36.145.238 (talk) 02:53, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  2011 Nat'l Medal of Science laureates
Talk:Criciúma

message: A cidade de Nova Trento foi retirada da relação de cidades próximas à Criciúma pois está localizada a cerca de 160 km dali.
200.180.11.225 16:26, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nova Trento foi retirada 
Talk:Slaughter-House Cases

message: The mosquito that is the principle carrier of yellow fever, Aedes aegypti, is not a scavenger, requiring blood meals of live red blood cells, and therefore does not feed on dead animal tissue.  Furthermore, the concept of mosquitoes being the vector for yellow fever was not discovered until 1900 by Walter Reed, MD.  The paragraph that states that mosquitoes feasting on offal were the cause of yellow fever is not only factually incorrect, but is therefore also anachronistic with respect to this 1873 SCOTUS case. (They simply wouldn't have known this, even if it were true.)  I will let someone else rewrite this paragraph, as I lack the desire to do so due to my unwillingness to be flamed and edit-warred by other "editors".  And we wonder why the numbers of Wikipedia editors are declining......216.137.246.141 (talk) 11:26, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: okay... 194.167.101.32 (talk) 15:50, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mosquitoes don't feast on dead animal tissue....factual errors abound.
Talk:Sylvan Lake, Alberta

message: The numbers given for visible minorities and religions look suspect. If a source cannot be found for them, they should be replaced with numbers from a reliable source. I don't know where to get the census data on religion, though.
Also, what I meant to say in the edit summary was "These numbers kind of look made-up. If a source cannot be found, they should be removed." Guff Brooking (talk) 21:47, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The numbers were from the 2001 federal census. There was some vandalism and original research embedded within the visible minorities and religion numbers which is now removed.Also, the proper reference has now been added. Although I would encourage someone to update these numbers with more current information from the 2006 federal census. Hwy43 (talk) 22:15, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics
Talk:Norwalk, Ohio

message: I just visited Norwalk and wanted to know the history and origins of a very old red brick building with a cone shaped turret. On top of the turret is a rod with a dragon curling down it. Can you please explain this building here and even include a photo of it. It is remarkable. It is near Seminary 69.223.165.166 21:52, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not know the answer, but there was a Huron County historian at one point; his name was Henry Timmon or Henry Timmons.  He may or may not still do that and/or there may be a replacement.  He also wrote a column for the newspaper (the Norwalk Reflector).  Wonder if he is on the web, either via the paper or his official capacity?--Inonit 23:22, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Visitor Question

message: In the politics section, I notice someone keeps changing the political party affiliation of Norwalk's mayor, state representatives, etc. from Democratic to Republican.  What might be the best way to deter the person who is doing this from continuing? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tcjoe1985 (talk • contribs) 22:09, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem

message: Not sure where it should be added, but it's probably worth mentioning that norovirus was named after this city.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alanrussian (talk • contribs) 20:01, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Norovirus
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Oxford University Labour Club

message: I don't quite understand why the double standard seems to exist, why Oxford Labour Club is a "speedy keep" and Hull is a "speedy delete".  Hull University Labour Club boasts its own impressive list of alumni including the current Deputy Prime Minister as well as several ministers and former ministers. British Higher Education Policy is based around the principle of an equality of opportunity; it seems bizarre to the heights of contradictions that pages relating to it on wikipedia should be so class ridden. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobbylad (talk • contribs) 22:25, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Cascavel

message: This article needs work.  Surely there is more to Cascavel than the medical centers.  What about agriculture, industry etc.? The English needs to be worked on, as it was not written by a native speaker.Vogensen 22:30, 25 January 2006 (UTC)