lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nilpotent

message: Under the section titled "Nilpotency in physics", it seems to me there is a confusion/unclarity of terminology.  Specifically, it would appear that an entity with the name 'Q' is used to mean variously and "operand", and "operator" and then Q^n is somehow a "function".  An operator Q acting n times on a function is still an operator (a function of functions), and it is confusing to call it a function rather than an operator.  The initial use of the term "operand" is unclear as at that point it is unclear to which operator it is an operand, and it would be clearer and more consistent to call it an "element", and to call it something other than Q which is later used to name an operator.  As I'm not entirely sure what the intent was, I am hesitant to make this change without consultation.  If no-one objects or changes this themselves, I will change it for greater consistency in due course.  Quondum (talk) 09:49, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology: operand/operator/function
Talk:2007 NCAA Division I softball tournament

message: I jumped the gun a bit on the College Station regional.  Sorry. Seancp 20:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: My bad

message: Check this link: http://www.ncaasports.com/baseball/mens/brackets/viewable/special64/2007/DI
Notice how the Baseball tournament regionals are fully seeded 1 through 4.  Well...
Now check this link: http://www.ncaasports.com/softball/womens/brackets/viewable/special64/2007/DI_64
Notice how the Softball regionals only list seeds for the 16 national seeds?  Well, I think this article should reflect that.  We have inaccurate information in this article by having each regional seeded 1 through 4.  If no one objects in a day or two then I will change the page to reflect the official NCAA bracket. Seancp 22:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, didn't even notice that.  I guess that explains how some "4 seeds" ended up hosting regionals.  Go ahead and make the change.Torlek 23:32, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Seeding
Talk:Samantha Larson

message: It's probably unusual to be starting a page about an 18-year-old, but this looks like a pretty special achievement.   
It needs a photo and an infobox, a link to her high school, a summary of her Seven Summits and something besides climbing.  Should her father have a separate article?  More later.--Hjal 20:49, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How to request deletion of a page?  If this is an achievement that's noteworthy and would lead to a wikipedia page, then we might start creating pages for all of the 7.35 billion inhabitants of this planet.  In a mountaineering-historical perspective this is absolutely nothing, really, not even worth the bother mentioning, and I think it's pages like these that decrease the value of wikipedia as as worthy platform.  Mention her in Guinness World Records?  Do as you please, but you can't seriously have clutter like this dilute the worth of this project.  Qwrk (talk) 14:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start article / things to do 

message: Feels like a case of WP:BLP1E, where her 2007 Everest climb got national coverage but little after.  She appears is almost no main climbing RS, so would likely fail WP:NCLIMBER, but her notability is solely from climbing? Aszx5000 (talk) 12:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Contrast her with Melissa Arnot who still gets regular coverage in the major global climbing media here, here, and here. Aszx5000 (talk) 13:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability is thin here
Talk:Patxi Vila

message: As per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people), which references Spanish naming conventions, I put this page at Patxi Vila for two reasons. Surname is simply Vila as the second surname is dropped in Spanish names. I placed the article at Patxi rather than Francisco or Francisco Javier as The most used name to refer to a person is generally the one that Wikipedia will choose as page name. A quick Google search showed about 37,000 hits for Patxi, 34,000 for Francisco and 15,000 for Francisco Javier. It's not overwhelming, however. Regards, SeveroTC 20:57, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:NRL South Australia

message: 'An attempt to make a mockery of the game'; This and other phrases in the section 'Premiership History' raises some concern relating to the neutrality of this article. It is recommended that these questionable remarks be edited to avoid any biased opinions.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knowledgio (talk • contribs) 07:24, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Anything uncited material that doesn't adhere to Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view, you can boldly remove yourself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.59.21.19 (talk) 09:14, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question of Neutrality
Talk:Nahr al-Bared refugee camp

message: isn't its the same as Nahr el-Bared? 89.0.47.144 13:50, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. If you look closely, that article redirects here. — George Saliba [talk] 20:32, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

message: thumb|Palestinians celebrating in Nahr al Bared, 2005.Here's another image of some celebrating Palestinians in Nahr al Bared back in 2005, which could be used if this article is ever expanded. FunkMonk 15:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another image 

message: Was it wrong information?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.1.242.165 (talk) 11:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did they ever find the robberies? 

message: I am disturbed by the editor who has reverted and inserted the fact that Fatah al-Islam is a resistance movement, rather then a terrorist group. Fatah al Islam murdered around 300 Lebanese civilians. They are listed by the US state department as an official terrorist organization. They are insprised by Al Qaida. There should be no question that they are a terrorist organization and the word should be "terrorist pockets- not resistance pockets."
:::--Eternalsleeper 06:42, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fatah al Islam is not resistance 

message: As a Palestinian refugee from Nahr El-Bared, I would like to emphasize on the status of Palestinians as refugees rather than a people with a nationality. Omar.shaban86 (talk) 06:38, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It isn't sourced either, so it can just be removed. FunkMonk (talk) 08:28, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Palestinian Refugees. 

message: Is Nahr al-Bared in Tripoli or Akkar? FunkMonk (talk) 22:01, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Pretty sure its in Tripoli. Tiamuttalk 15:57, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  District? 

message: *Free the refugees of Nahr al-Bared
*The Destruction of Nahr el Bared in Children of Catastrophe: Journey from a Palestinian Refugee Camp to America. Tiamuttalk 15:57, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:William Westerfeld House

message: It's unclear if this location is called the "William Westerfield House" or the "William Westerfeld House" (with no i).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueSkyOnMars (talk • contribs) 01:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The City of San Francisco lists the name as "Westerfield House" on the official listing, however all other sources online list the house as "Westerfeld House" without the letter i. I think maybe it was a typo to add the letter i? Jooojay (talk) 08:42, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of the name

message: Dropping this here so I can close the tab: https://sf.curbed.com/2016/3/28/11319088/westerfeld-house Yngvadottir (talk) 15:34, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Curbed'' article
Talk:Unital algebra

message: Shouldn't the product be
:(x,r) * (y,s) = (xy + sx , ry + rs) 
? 
/Daniel  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.217.161.181 (talk) 13:49, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Second component ry + rs is not in K as it should be by the definition of the article's author (he defines algebra structure on A×K)  — Artem M. Pelenitsyn (talk) 14:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

message: Please, don't use the notion unitary here. It is already used in Hilbert spaces for the unitary groups and their Lie algebras. Even unital is superfluous. It suffices to use algebra with unit (element).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.133.155.66 (talk) 08:47, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  unitary is misleading 

message: Do we really need ths article? Shouldn't this be merged into, say, pseudo-ring? -- Taku (talk) 07:20, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There is redundancy. But perhaps a merge to unit ring would be better, as both articles are largely about unital rings. --Mark viking (talk) 15:31, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a good place to discuss "unital" vs "non-unital" is pseudo-ring, which already discusses the unitalization. And one article should be enough for the topic. I suggest we merge both this one and unital ring into pseudo-ring. -- Taku (talk) 18:02, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  That would be OK too, as long as redirects are created from unit ring and unital algegbra to pseudo-ring for easy searching by readers. --Mark viking (talk) 18:45, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to [[pseudo-ring]]?
Talk:Antibody/to do

message: Some things I may tackle but feel free to help or comment!
* The Structure section needs description of Immunoglobulin domains - these are mentioned throughout article but never really described.
: this is started, at least
* A diagram is needed in the Immunoglobulin diversity section - perhaps showing location of genes on chromosome or mechanism of recombination.
: done - V(D)J recomb, and class switch recomb diagrams added
* Still need to clarify affinity v. avidity. think this is done
* Need to fix consistency. Someone chopped out much of the info from non-humans (i.e. all the heavy chain stuff), but left a little bit in (the light chain stuff) - should it all go or should some stuff come back? 
Ciar 21:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Irimayašša

message: The 2 quotes in the letter are not actually indented, or in paragraphic form. I tried the indenting to see if it would look more appropriate in the letter.  [It is all one letter with no paragraphs]- (from the SonoranDesert ofArizona)- -Mmcannis 21:50, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The indented quotes
Talk:The Street (British TV series)

message: Is there ever going to be a new series, or has it ended for good? Werdnawerdna (talk) 14:10, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Series 3?

message: The episode guide might need a bit of clean-up to remove the use of some rather parochial language; series three, particularly.
Absurdtrousers (talk) 09:34, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language use
Template talk:POTD/2007-06-14

message: thats crazy
will a non-moving version of this be used for the main page because of lag?
Omlp 21:55, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that will be prepared as we get closer to the POTD date. howcheng  {chat} 01:00, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Moduli space

message: Currently satisfied with Introduction, and Basic Examples.  Partially satisfied with Definitions.  Later sections are a mess. 76.253.92.38 (talk) 02:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've cleaned up everything but the section on Further Examples, which is still a mess.  76.253.92.38 (talk) 19:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Clean-Up 

message: In this chapter it is said,
"A fine moduli space is an object X, together with a family f:T \rightarrow X called the universal family, with the property that given any family g:A → B, there is a unique map φ(g):B → X such that the pullback of f along φ(g) is g. "
Shouldn't the "T" be an "A"? T  is nowhere defined and not used again.--129.70.14.132 16:52, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fine versus coarse moduli spaces 

message: It would be useful to talk about atlas's of stacks and give the atlas for the module of vector bundles on a curve. See Page 81 of https://impa.br/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/PM_36.pdf Kaptain-k-theory (talk) 18:36, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some additions
Talk:Plastiscines

message: Link "Plastiscines interview on Velvetpanda" is invalid ("Not Found. Sorry I can't find what you're looking for").
Please, fix it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr r0ckers (talk • contribs) 12:12, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Link "Plastiscines interview on Velvetpanda"

message: Please help find better sources for the claims currently supported only by feedburner.com and myspace.com. Francophones welcome! --Lexein (talk) 10:01, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources & notability 

message: This section's heading is subjective (even if true) and generally the section needs to be expressed in a more "encyclopaedic" way. IXIA (talk) 16:07, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Bad news"
Talk:Petar Lubarda

message: 1. Actually Cetinje is 90%, rather than 96% Montenegrin (though I don't see what has this got to do with Lubarda himself) 
2. With the formation of Communist Yugoslavia after 1945, Petar Lubarda opted for the Serbian national confession, and never the Montenegrin one (although that simply cannot change the fact he himself is a Montenegrin). --PaxEquilibrium 22:03, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnicity 

message: Since recent growing tensions in Montenegro between national Montenegrin and Montenegrin Serb opting, not to raise any further controversy, I think that we should replace 'Montenegrin' with 'Montenegrin Serb' reference, to avoid any confusion about Lubarda's ethnicity and country of origin.
'Serbian' by default means 'from Serbia', and 'Montenegrin' 'from Montenegro', assuming that the talk is about a person of Serb and Montenegrin ethnicity, respectively. As well as in Bosnia, where we have Bosnian Serb, Bosnian Croat and 'Bosnian' which is by default 'Bosnian Bosniak', in Montenegro we have ethnic Serbs, who differ from Montenegrins only in the way they opt for themselves, but are de facto people of one language and ethnic background. Lubarda is ethnically and nationally (we talk about former Yugoslavia) declared Serb and therefore Serbian, but given his geographical background and the fact that today Montenegro is a separate country and nation, he is also retroactively Montenegrin, but not 'default Montenegrin' (Montenegrin Montenegrin), but Montenegrin Serb.
http://www.njegos.org/past/lubardaag.jpg  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marechiel (talk • contribs) 09:37, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See: Lubarda about himself--Despotović (talk) 19:44, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Montenegrin' or 'Montenegrin Serb'? 
Talk:Weaving (horse)

message: :Not sure this is even a veterinary topic??  I suppose there are veterinary consequences?  If there was a field of veterinary psychology... ?? (grin) Montanabw(talk) 17:06, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been treating all domesticated animal behavior articles as if they were related to veterinary medicine.  However, I guess with horses vets are probably not called in for behavior problems, unlike with dogs and cats.  The tag can go or stay, it's up to you.  --Joelmills 00:58, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It isn't of any real deep and significant importance to me. (grin)  You're the vet; if you think it's a veterinary topic, it is.  Maybe ask Dlh if he gets behavior problem questions as a horse vet.  Most folks I know might call a vet if they think a behavior problem is health-related, but once it isn't, they call a trainer.  Weaving is, I suppose, in a gray area, as it is mostly a psychological/behavioral problem that can, in extreme cases, have veterinary consequences. Montanabw(talk) 16:34, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sencha

message: When I read about sencha I'm left not exactly knowing what sencha is. From the article I gather that sencha is a type of green tea but the article fails to explain how it differs from other Japanese green teas.
: Among the types of Japanese green tea prepared by infusion, "sencha" is distinguished from such specific types as gyokuroand bancha. It is the most popular tea in Japan, representing about 80 percent of the tea produced in Japan.[2]
As you can see from the quote I took from the article, it explains that sencha is a kind of green tea that is different from gyokuro and bancha but doesn't explain how they are different.
I know very little about Japanese teas so I can't edit the article right away. I can fix the problem but honestly I don't know when I'll be able to do the research and write up. If someone here can fix the article so that it explains how sencha differs from other Japanese green teas it would be very helpful. -- Joel M.Chat ✐ 16:39, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Zoohouse is correct. Please fix it! It's been more than five years. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 04:50, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation of Sencha is vauge 

message: To add to this article: the etymology of the term "煎茶." 173.88.246.138 (talk) 04:50, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article

message: The time and temperature recommended varies greatly between types of sencha, method of preparation, etc. The presence of a time and temperature gives the false idea that there is a standard when there is not. Even a singular preparer of tea will choose to vary the time and temperature, especially based on the number of infusions, but also in order to get a different effect from the tea. More evidence of this: if you look in the edits people keep changing the temperature. Not to mention that during the original method of preparation thermometers were not used. Golem Unity (talk) 16:26, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time and temperature should be removed
Talk:Tommy Lucchese

message: The background section of the article says "Lucchese (pronounced Luickese)". That pronunciation doesn't help. How about something recognizable, preferably in IPA? -Phoenixrod (talk) 15:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: Removed this paragraph because it duplicates information in the Valachi Hearings and Joseph Valachi files and does not directly apply to this article. I welcome any feedback on this move.Rogermx (talk) 20:45, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Valachi paragraph 

message: This article contains lots of unsubstantiated, not to say POV and OR, information. Interestingly, a great deal of it originates with ONE (1) unregistered editor, who did all his work during one month in 2009, and never edited another article! If anyone knows good resources, how about cleaning this up! Regards Tapered (talk) 05:10, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That guy must have been a New York insider. ;) 83.251.164.50 (talk) 19:24, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lots of Unreferenced info 
Talk:Ahmose Sapair

message: I think this prince is the same as Ahmose-Sipair. Dodson places him earlier in the dynasty. The first son of Ahmose I was Ahmose-ankh, he was the one who predeceased his father, thus allowing Amenhotep I to inherit. – Alensha talk 15:07, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Articles discussing Ahmose Sipair:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3821899?read-now=1&seq=7#page_scan_tab_contents
https://www.academia.edu/27375879/THE_RISE_OF_THUTMOSE_I_AND_TWO_THEBAN_PRINCES
https://www.academia.edu/40513836/THE_MYSTERIOUS_MUMMY_UNKNOWN_MAN_C_
"Therefore,the mummy formerly thought to be Thutmose I [but who is a prince] stands a goodchance of being Ahmose-Sipair" -- Marianne Luban
There are 2 or 3 different Sipair's of similar timeframe.  One is the son of Seqenenre_Tao.  And a second one who appears to be the son of Ahmose.  I think the 5 year old is the elder.  The mummy of Thutmose I, who is 30 years old, does not conform to the expected age of Thutmose I(60 years old).  I think this 30 year old mummy is that of Ahmose Sipair. A possible third Sipair is listed on a monument as the son of Ahmosi(Sister of Amenhotep I) and Wedehu Senbu(Unknown).
Additionally, Manetho shares the story of Osarsiph.  I believe this story refers to Ahmose Sipair.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osarseph
Additionally, Manetho lists an additional pharoah, Khebron, before Amenhotep I.  I believe this pharoah is not Thutmose I out of order, but that of a missing additional pharoah, Ahmose Sipair.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.57.110.91 (talk) 19:27, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional Info

message: The 5 year old Sapair was the son of Amenhotep I. He is called Rapses by Manetho via Josephus:
https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Manetho/History_of_Egypt/2*.html
"245 As for his five-year‑old son Rapsês[a different Sapair],​93 he sent him safely away to his friend.​94"
Rapses in this text is Sapair spelled backward to differentiate him from Ahmose Sapair. 2601:58B:E7F:8410:F562:AB3A:D130:6069 (talk) 19:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mummy of 5 year old Sapair - re-identified as the son of Amenhotep I
Talk:Retrocession Day

message: It stinks, then, that exactly 26 years later to the day, the Republic of China, now a democratic nation with free elections, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of internet access, respect for the individual, was kicked out of the UN and replaced by the "People's" Republic of China - with a one-party dictatorship, no elections, repression of speech, state-dictated religious practices, a "Great Firewall of China", and exploitation of people to suit the state. I do hope for reunification... with the extension of the island's freedoms to all the people on the mainland. GBC 22:25, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Republic of China obvious lost that Civil War and is no longer effectively in control of China, continuing to give China's seat to a government that only holds control over a small fraction of China's citizens was delusional and a slap in the face to the Chinese people. Also, at the time the transfer took place, the Republic of China was not, in fact, a democracy. It was a single party rightist dictatorship. Not that the politics of a nation in question should have any bearing on this question, a people do not lose their international rights simply because we don't like their system of government.108.131.78.102 (talk) 15:59, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

text: Actually, I agree with you politically. However, we should all play by the rules, and the Potsdam Declaration and Japanese Instrument of Surrender by themselves are primary sources that by themselves can reasonably be cited only as to what they themselves say. Interpretations of the significance of these items would require secondary sources. If you're interested in the details, I'd like to recommend checking out the article legal status of Taiwan for an incomplete list of interpretations, both pro and con. Whether the JIS returned sovereignty of Taiwan is the mainstream view or simply a mainstream view is, believe it or not, widely disputed. Ngchen (talk) 22:51, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Coincidence