lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Viral pathogenesis

message: Peer Review
Zabb17 (talk) 17:47, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think your introduction is very well written. It has a good flow of the different mechanisms of viral pathogenesis. Some suggestions for this section would just be to talk more about viral pathogenesis and viral diseases. I like that you have a good table of contents of the topics that will be covered. 
The mechanism of infection is also good, but you could give more detail about the three requirements for successful infection. The section where you talk about replication, dissemination in nerves, and shedding could also use more detail. You can talk about what each process is and what is does. 
The discussion for incubation period and evolution are good. They give enough information that allows the audience to understand the concept. Overall I think you did a good job. The page is organized neatly and the information are well supported by your sources.  
Munguidg (talk) 18:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review 

message: Hello, my name is Isabelle and I am currently a final year undergraduate in Biochemistry at Imperial College London. As part of my Science Communications course, I have been tasked to produce a more in depth article into this topic of interest, Viral Pathogenesis. I will be amending and adding on to the texts that were written by the previous author. This is a highly relevant area in the fundamentals to virology, so I hope that by producing a generalised introduction of the topic, readers will then be able to further their reading into scientific literature with sufficient prior knowledge and understanding. Hope this helps!
Isabellelyy (talk) 05:03, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits and expansion of information
Talk:Molecular sensor

message: The definition of "molecular sensor" is rather problematic. For example, as it is right now it includes pH indicators, but it doesn't include any moecules that detect e.g. temperature, polarity, or magnetic fields. Of course, the problem is that if you open up the definition too far, you then include parctically any functional molecular system you can think of!
I think it is correct to limit the definition to the sensing of chemical species, but in that case perhaps the article title should be "Molecular chemical sensors"? Certainly some discussion of the term is necessary. It will also be necessary to give at least a few sentences to trivial examples such as the aforementioned pH indicators before moving on the more interesting stuff.
I don't want to look like I'm just going around criticizing articles. What's here is solid. I'm just thinking on how to make it more so. And I will come back and put my keyboard where my mouth is when I get some time to invest in it...
• TheBendster (talk) 23 September 2007, 14:01 (UTC)
* the phrase molecular sensor occurs regularly in the so therefore reason enough to devote an article to it. Your suggestion Molecular chemical sensors score 4 hits on google compare to 20,000 hits for molecular sensor. The lead specifies clearly that it is a chemical species that is detected and not something like temperature. Perhaps the phrase analyte should be replaced by something else. Please note that the basic article layout relies heavily on reference 2 given in the article. V8rik 16:45, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition
Talk:James Neil Tucker

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 22:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: :Almost 10 years ago it was stated this article might be able to make B-class. An 2005 article about a career criminal, rapist, and murderer of Rosa Lee Dolly Oakley and Shannon Lynn Mellon, who was executed. There are only general references and I do not see that reliable sources are evident to prove the notability of the subject then or now. Otr500 (talk) 22:51, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article issues
Talk:Valley of the Temples Memorial Park

message: Okay stub, but needs lots of work.
First off, it's mentioned that it's a memorial site. But memorial of WHAT? Why was it built? What does it commemorate? What is its historical and cultural significance. Why is it located in Hawaii and not Japan (assuming it was built in memorial of some Japnese event or Japanese/American event like WW2 or Pearl Harbor)?
More info needed. Mgmirkin 02:30, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: stub

message: Inside the main par of the temple there is a 9-12 ft Buddha sitting on a gold leaf lotus.
What does "there is a 9-12 ft Buddha" mean? Is it 9 feet or 12 feet? Surely it is not both, or some variable between them. Surely it is not Schrodinger's Buddha, where it might be any value between 9 and 12 feet, and you don't know until you observe it. --70.131.119.53 (talk) 06:25, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm confused. 

message: The articles speak of the same place. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 03:00, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. If no one opposes by Friday, I'll merge the two articles. Mcampany (talk) 19:35, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

text: I'm fine, my personal life is going a little haywire, so I've been working on easy WP things instead of this, sorry. I'll get to it soon, hopefully tonight. Thanks for the reminder!Mcampany (talk) 01:28, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: That's all it was - a reminder. :-) Take care.--The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 02:34, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I merged everything in, but I think the Byodo-In Temple article could use some reorganization. The lede is far too long. I'm not sure what would make the most sense, so if you have any ideas please take a crack at it! Mcampany (talk) 07:29, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for doing that! Not sure when, but I'll look at it. Actually, it looks good.-The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 11:18, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Byodo-In Temple]] 

message: I vehemently condemned. Rolsewiki (talk) 00:41, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extremely painful
Talk:Molecular anthropology

message: I have added a history section to the article, removed the stub. I have added several images in support of the history section. Added 25 references supporting the history although there is a review of anthropology history written I drafted this history before it was published, and I am familiar with the papers... so. I think many of these papers are good reads. 
The history section is missing the exact reference to molecular anthropology, I believed it was coined at a conference in 1962 but cannot find the reference. A little trivia. My spelling is bad and grammar sometimes as well. I generally correct things a week after the fact so . . . . .PB666 yap 03:13, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes

message: I've added a sentence or two to the introduction explaining certain modifications that have been made subsequent to the studies which have stated a 98% commonality between the human and chimp genomes.  Let me know if any editors feel what I have added is contentious. -Ano-User (talk) 01:25, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Changes 

message: >>>The process of recombination, if frequent enough, corrupts the ability to create parsimonious trees because stretches of amino acid subsititions (SNPs)
 I think "because" is a typo..  "between" makes sense  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.50.184.24 (talk) 10:14, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification needed 

message: The section is FULL of grammatical errors, confused verbiage, and sentence fragments. What is needed is a new and clear exposition by an expert attempting to TEACH the topic as CLEARLY as possible. 
Beyond the basic issue of readability, information is paraded with FEW or NO CITATIONS to substantiate any of what is written.
Since I am completely new to the topic here, I can in no way contribute beyond pointing out the unacceptably low quality. 
* Can some knowledgeable author rewrite the section with the intent of CLARITY to help new students with the topic? *
(Also, other sections on the topic page need help. Terms suddenly appear in many places --with no hyperlinks-- that presuppose the reader already understands the "genetics jargon" that is being discussed.)
Thanks! 47.12.251.109 (talk) 19:13, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Causes of errors" subsection is word soup 

message: This topic is very interesting to many people and the field is obviously rapidly changing. Yet the most recent sources listed are 15 or more years old. There must be MANY newer finds, studies, and conclusions that are absent here. 
Maybe someone reading this can prod some expert they have contact with into sharing the fascinating updates emerging from genetic anthropology?
(So, how did they extract DNA from the "fossilized finger" of that new species of human, the denisovan, anyway? So many questions....) 47.12.251.109 (talk) 21:06, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page needs expert updating BADLY!
Talk:Animal cell culture

message: Many cells uasully contain vacuole  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.219.23.103 (talk) 16:28, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just cleaned up the article some, but really I don't think it serves any purpose. The main "Cell Culture" entry is better maintained and more specific. I would imagine you could delete this article and no one would be harmed by that action. - Herp N. Derpington PhD, 18 Jan 2011  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.125.45.143 (talk) 23:45, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Passaging

message: Can we get a reference for the statement that cells will die if there are too few?  (Sounds interesting to me.) RJFJR (talk) 17:57, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have merged the contents of this page into subculture (biology) as passaging is a particular example of subculture and doesn't really deserve it's own article, especially of this quality. - Zephyris Talk 16:19, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to [[subculture (biology)]]
Talk:Mineral salts pyridone broth

message: The term "mineral salts" in this title should be clarified in this article, from good sources, with that same material transcribed/translated to related sodium, magnesium, etc. salt articles. At present, with the web as the only source for defining "mineral salts", the naive reader is taken to dubious articles pushing unnecessary naturopathic remedies (rather than teaching the reader about the meaning of old chemical terms). Ask an older chemist who edits here for assistance, if needed. Cheers. 2601:246:C700:558:6498:FD08:42BA:D8FC (talk) 05:37, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dedicated editors in this area
Talk:HL60

message: There is no need of insulin to ensure HL-60 proliferation.
http://www.atcc.org/ATCCAdvancedCatalogSearch/ProductDetails/tabid/452/Default.aspx?ATCCNum=ccl-240&Template=cellBiology  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.32.187.186 (talk) 11:28, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am not able to find anything about the relation between HL-60 and HL-60(TB), at least not with a quick search. What I can find is that they are at least very similar, not only by name.
Cellosaurus entries:
* http://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_0002
* http://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_A794
Somebody out there who knows more? Tomdo08 (talk) 01:44, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  HL-60 versus HL-60(TB)
Talk:Cell fate determination

message: The introductory paragraph gives a pretty good overview of developmental biology but doesn’t really get into explaining the actual topic of “cell fate determination.” The explanation only comes in the third paragraph under “cell fate.” The article may be more clear and direct if this paragraph was incorporated in the introduction. Nia2993 (talk) 18:30, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cell fate determination  

message: I suggest adding a footnote to the end of the Syncytial Specification section and also expanding this section to include more information on the subject. Mmilldev (talk) 02:52, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Syncytial Specification
Talk:Discharge petition

message: Two notable spots for expansion in this article:
* What was the discharge petition like from 1910-1931?  Everything I've read simply says that it's "not comparable" to the modern one because it was too different.
* How do discharge resolutions in the Senate work?  I found those examples of senators signing 'em, but I can't find anything in the rules on them, or any commentary, or anything.  Besides, with filibusters, they're pretty irrelevant anyway - if the leadership is that hardcore, the bill is going down anyway.  Still, the formal rules would be nice, even if they don't actually matter.
Also, the last comment on analogues in parliamentary systems...  I'm kinda out of my depth on that count, so if anyone who knows more on that wants to expand on that or offer a better link, feel free. SnowFire 02:45, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: the last part seems to imply that in parlenent ministers in the same party are all required to vote the same way that looks like nonsense i know that isn't the topic of the article but all info within it still needs to be accurate 216.25.247.244 (talk) 17:18, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The last part 
Talk:Plymouth, Michigan

message: I wish that the first picture of Main Street would have turned out better. I had my phone set to 160 resolution, so that's why it's so blurry. 
Wrifraff101 02:32, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sections of this article are written as advertisements. I'll be trimming the 'Events' section shortly, and I think we may choose to delete the 'Restaurants' section entirely - I don't think it can be saved. Morganbored (talk) 23:22, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisements. 
Talk:Chemotype

message: There aren't as many good articles on the term and how it's used with respect to bacteria, but there is one in International bulletin of bacteriological nomenclature and taxonomy volume 12 (1962). Google snippet view shows the following: "The term "chemovar (chemotype)" may be used to designate an infrasubspecific subdivision to include infra- ..." and I can take a look at this resource in the library this week. I'll keep looking elsewhere for clear explanations of the term in other disciplines. It also seems to have been used quite a bit in the 1930s - 1960s to describe a relationship between disease susceptibility in humans, just google "chemotype somatotype". Rkitko (talk) 00:46, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I take back what I said about the non-notability of this topic. It seems to me that the biggest remaining problem is the lack of reliable citations. Do you have time to make a change, perhaps remove the unsoruced botany explaination with a sourced microbiology reference? --Salimfadhley (talk) 09:27, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I added two reliable sources last night. I rely heavily on the (now sourced) Thymus botany example reference, though. It had a detailed description and criticism of the concept, something I haven't seen in any other paper. Most just use the term without comment on its meaning as if its well understood in the discipline. I need to dig deeper and add more refs so that one ref is not dominant. However, I think it's a decent start-class, referenced article at the moment. The above was more a note to myself to check up on that reference when I go to the library on Friday. Rkitko (talk) 16:44, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Excellent, what a difference 24 hours can make! ;-) --Salimfadhley (talk) 16:49, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Got it! And added the new source. I think we have a good balance of botany and microbiology now. It's curious that the term means the same thing in both disciplines but the 2009 botany paper made an effort to describe the genesis of the term, claiming that it was coined by Dr. Rolf Santesson in 1968 when it was clearly being used by the microbiologists a decade earlier. (Early uses can be found in the 50s in the same sense as adopted by the bacteriological code in 1962, still earlier than Santesson's usage applied to botany.) It's amusing that the botanists didn't make the connection, or perhaps they were restricting their discussion to its application in botany, although that wasn't clear. Ah well. I think I'm done for now but I'll keep a watch on the article. Rkitko (talk) 18:23, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Also in microbes

message: ...where its meaning is completely different!  See for instance < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3058157/ >. LeProf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.223.9.222 (talk) 15:59, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to differentiate this use, from use of the term "chemotype" in drug discovery...
Talk:Rainbow Bridge (Kansas)

message: I initially created this article here, then found the article (as a stub) at Brush Creek Bridge.  The bridge is listed under that name at the National Register's list and as being located as "Baxter Springs".  When I went searching on the web and looking through various Route 66 books, everything list it as the "Rainbow Bridge" or the "Marsh Arch Bridge", with most going to the former.  As suggested at talk on the WikiProject National Register page, I used "common sense" and went with "Rainbow Bridge" for the name.  To my knowledge, it has never had an "official" name, being only a small bridge over a small, rural creek.  I live not far from there, and I will check and see what is on the landmark signs next time I am over there. Squad51 02:50, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The sign posted by the bridge (I was by there last week) reads "Rainbow Arch Bridge".  Squad51 00:11, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lorenzo Homar

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.bosamar.com/pages/award_criteria. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Widy9 (talk) 07:34, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I know this problem may happen in other article, but, do we have reliable sources for the section about Mr. Homar's awards and medals? 
I don't believe we can rely on "common military knowledge" for that, as seemed to be stated on previous edit summaries. --damiens.rf 12:59, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medals
Talk:Amyloplast

message: I think the gravity sensing part should be moved to Statocyte --Lode (talk) 10:22, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gravity sensing 

message: I heavily edited the page by rewriting everything to be more accurate and to include citations for all the facts presented.
Avaheller (talk) 05:01, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: What is the amyloplast 49.148.154.136 (talk) 09:37, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  SCIENCE
Talk:Hypersensitive response

message: Hello everyone, 
I am a final year Biochemistry BSc student at Imperial College London and as part of an educational assignment, I am expected to improve this article. I plan on increasing the text length using information published in peer-reviewed scientific publications and also I plan on including some diagrams to help better illustrate the concept. My plan for improving the article currently includes:
* Including a new section about the genetics involved in the initiation of the hypersensitive response: relocate the information about Harold Flor's gene for gene hypothesis into this section and talking about the NLR proteins involved in the process. 
* Including a section about how the HR response is regulated to prevent spontaneous, unregulated cell death by negative regulation of NLR proteins. 
* I would like to expand the 'Mechanism' section to include the different ways in which HR can be activated after recognition of the pathogen effector. Furthermore, I plan on providing specific examples of these mechanisms from peer-reviewed original research.
* I plan on including a section on a recent discovery that the hypersensitive response might lead to plant speciation. 
* Finally, I would like to compare the HR response and the cellular/molecular components involved in the mechanism are similar or different from the ones observed in animal immunity. 
* I also plan to include several diagrams and/or photos to better illustrate the mechanisms behind the activation of the hypersensitive response. I would highly appreciate any suggestions for this from the community. 
This is my preliminary plan on what to include and I would appreciate any suggestions and/or questions from the community on what should I focus on. 
Thank you, DanieliusKa (talk) 15:27, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Educational assignment
Talk:Phototropin

message: This book is references 2 and 3, but doesn't appear in google search results or in library searches. Not sure where it's come from but it doesn't seem to exist. Knortfox (talk) 21:31, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference "molecular basis of botanical biology" 

message: — Assignment last updated by TBwichem (talk) 19:46, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Biochemistry II
Talk:2007 Gatorade Duels

message: Why is this the Gatorade Dual Scandal?  Shouldn't it just be the Daytona 500 qualifying scandal or something similar.  The only penalty from the duals was Jeff Gordon having to go to the back of the pack. Bigdottawa 05:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  gatorade dual scandal?