lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:AWB

message: Check page to the "Request approval" column
: Done —Mets501 (talk) 02:48, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest adding 

message: Is it really necessary to transclude a template just to get a bullet/mid dot? --kingboyk 15:03, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mid dot 

message: See. Checkingfax (talk) 05:02, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: As stated in the talk header you kindly added to this page, "This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the AWB template."  Instead, I suggest you post to Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser with some explanation (e.g. Do you like this undocumented feature?  Is there a problem with the removal of this blank field?)  Thanks!  GoingBatty (talk) 23:44, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: , will do. The date= parameter is not deprecated and I don't agree with its removal even if empty. Having empty fields ready to go speeds up later population of the parameter, especially by novice editors. Here is the CS1 guideline on parameter deprecation. Checkingfax (talk) 23:56, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Upon further inspection, I noticed that the reference before the AWB edit was |date=May 2004|work=State of New Jersey Commission of Investigation|author=|date=|.  One of AWB's general fixes is to remove duplicated fields.  GoingBatty (talk) 00:05, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks . Nice catch.  managed by  as seen here is clearly considering the date= parameter to be deprecated, which it is not. Checkingfax (talk) 00:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: AWB is removing date= parameter in references

message: I'm writing up :de:Momme Andresen for English Wiki.  is giving me a page number error - he's on pp. 286-287 in NDB, but I have to enter pp. 284-285 to get his NDB article - . Can anyone help? Narky Blert (talk) 22:29, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Didn't you mean to post on the  talk page rather than here? Rjwilmsi 07:09, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  I did indeed. Thank you for waking me up. Narky Blert (talk) 09:41, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Off-by-two page error
Talk:Walter E. Fernald Developmental Center

message: This is a heavy accusation to level without providing any references. If the reports are truly widespread, there should be no difficulty tracking one down.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.60.150.225 (talk) 21:09, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "widespread reports of physical and sexual abuse" 

message: This article has been vandalized with references to the tv show "The Walking Dead."  This is especially apparent in the "History" section, which names characters from the show and leads off with the phrase "Welcome to Terminus."  Overthinkingit (talk) 12:29, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wadsworth Atheneum

message: Changed "the oldest public art museum in the United States" to "one of the oldest..." The existing footnote makes it clear that there are several others that are much older. It is possible that it is the oldest purpose-built art museum building still in use in the US but this would require a reference -- based on the footnote, the Redwood Library would be a century older, as it still occupies its original building and has an art gallery, but this may not be the original collection.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.2.5.249 (talk) 17:36, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:23rd Air Division (United States)

message: I propose changing the name of this article to "23rd Air Division" to align it with the standard unit naming convention in Wikipedia. Pen of bushido 16:20, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed name change 

message: I have changed the class rating to >blank< because of modifications and work performed on the article. NDCompuGeek 13:25, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class Rating Change
Talk:Kobo (woreda)

message: Given the recent high interest on this, and the related topics like Welkait and Raya Azebo, it should be  semi protected:-  
Truth gate keeper (talk) 13:52, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Should be semi protected
Talk:USS Ling

message: I'm curious about two things that aren't covered here. Why was there such a long time span between launch and commissioning? And how did she get a battle star if she never went into battle? Kendall-K1 (talk) 17:44, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info needed 

message: It seems to me the last paragraph of the "Site" section, regarding the bridge, is completely irrelevant to the article and a tad annoying as one wastes time attempting to map it's relevance to the submarine.... Or anything else in the article.
It's an interesting bit of information, on its own, but really should be removed.
Mad Bunny (talk) 07:07, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevant and thus, Confusing Paragraph
Talk:Tunkhannock Viaduct

message: Please clarify "biggest" in the introductory paragraph.  It's not the longest concrete bridge in America.  So in the context of this article, to what does this term refer?  Alphageekpa 11:29, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please clarify your claim.  According to the National Historic Engineering Record in the Library of Congress, "More than 50 years after its building, the Tunkhannock Viaduct still merits the title of largest concrete bridge in America, if not the world."65.167.40.158 (talk) 16:51, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I made no such claim.  I made a request that "biggest" be defined.  Tallest? Longest? By what parameter is it the "biggest"? Alphageekpa (talk) 23:32, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's definitely not length or height, more likely volume of concrete. Can anyone beat 169,000 cubic yards according to "Progress of Tunkhannock Viaduct Construction on D., L. & W. Relocation," Engineering Record 68, No. 22 (29 Nov. 1913): 594? Martindelaware (talk) 07:31, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Biggest concrete bridge in America

message: The infobox states that there are 13 "piers in water". Where did this information come from? I know from personal experience that there are zero piers in the water. The creek passes between two of the piers. (I have been on, under, and all around the viaduct hundreds of times.) Because it is original research, I will not change the category to 0. However, unless the 13 figure can be substantiated, I will blank that category in the infobox.    → Michael J Ⓣ Ⓒ Ⓜ 06:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Piers in water
Talk:Track Rock

message: Having seen the wealth of archeological hypotheses and evidence presented in America Unearthed:Ancient Mayan Secrets in Georgia (a History Channel original from 2012) I believe these alleged findings warrant mention, if not full exploration, in this article. 2600:8807:3C87:E000:43F:2430:9DFC:83DC (talk) 23:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: America Unearthed is known for promoting pseudohistory. Scott Wolters is a specialist in concrete, the "forensic geologist" bit is just how he promotes himself. See  and . Thornton's been trying to get his nonsense included in Wikipedia for years and failed. I'm sure it's all very convincing if you don't know the literature. Doug Weller talk 10:45, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This is brilliant.https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/58faadc3e07642878aa3df359a66d366]. Doug Weller talk 10:46, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of alleged Maya connection
Talk:Deep Dickollective

message: I oppose the deletion of this article on the grounds of notability.  Deep Dickollective has been all over the country and contributed significantly to anti-racist and anti-heterosexist theory through the medium of hip hop. Dkreisst (talk) 02:32, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please find and add sourcing that show this.  -- Banjeboi 13:20, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: I'm sorry, guys, I just don't "get" this article.  Other than rationalizing repetitions of the words "queer," "gay," "homo," and such, this article seems to be about nothing, other than a band I never heard of, and boy howdy, there's a million of those.  Can I say that a band doesn't have to be all-black or all-gay or all-whatever in order to be less-than-notable?
Jessemckay (talk) 14:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You can say that, but as the first all-black, openly gay hip hip band who pioneered homo hop they simply aren't going to be deleted.  -- Banjeboi 17:19, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Yes on Deletion

message: "Simply aren't going to be deleted?"  Is this your final answer?
Jessemckay (talk) 01:48, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Huh?
Talk:Ticonderoga (steamboat)

message: Stulen, Frank L. Jr.(2000) The restoration, preservation, and reinterpretation of the Steamboat Ticonderoga in The conservation of heritage interiors: preprints of a conference symposium 2000, Ottawa, Canada May 17 to 20, 2000 Ottawa: Canadian Conservation Institute.
NRavenel (talk) 15:27, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resources for Expansion of the Article 

message: There is a photo of the Ticonderogas boiler; would that fit in here, or maybe a link? File:A boiler of steamboat Ticonderoga (1906).jpg .45Colt 17:54, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons 
Talk:List of lakes of New Zealand

message: Please consider adding a coordinates column to each table, using .  is available as a column header. Thank you. Andy Mabbett 11:11, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 

message: According to the list of the deepest lakes in the world, Te Anau is deeper than Wakatipu.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_lakes_by_depth  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.213.204.122 (talk) 09:02, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deepest lakes 

message: There's obvious errors in this list. E.g. Lake Pukaki is much larger than Tekapo (look at them side-by-side in Google Earth!), yet this list tells me Tekapo is larger! Also, South Island lakes especially have changed over time (hydro power schemes etc). Without a dated, verifiable, reliable source, this list is meaningless.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.118.179.155 (talk) 23:05, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I also note that Lake Ellesmere is listed as 5th= in the table at 180sq km but the Lake Ellesmere page says 197.81sq km which puts it easily in 4th place. Some sort of published source attribution for each measure seems appropriate. Fivey (talk) 05:37, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about some references? 

message: I've uploaded a photo of Lake Selfe to , just in case that this inspires somebody to write an article about the lake. Schwede66 19:18, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: I see you’ve changed a number of links to point to Christchurch City, which I note is a dab page. Schwede66 17:41, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: OK - I'll fix that. Thanks. Grutness...wha? 21:02, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dab 

message: Hi it says Southest. Is this a typo for Southeast or Southwest? ϢereSpielChequers 18:24, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Checking the map I'd say West South West. ϢereSpielChequers 09:43, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Southest

message: All the pictures shunt the table down the page in an unattractive way that I do not know how to fix. 119.224.134.13 (talk) 09:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting error
Talk:Messerschmitt Me 309

message: this statement "just as the Bf 109 was having its first encounters with the Spitfire in the Battle of Britain, the first aircraft to match the 109 in speed and performance." is incorrect the 109 not encounter the Spitfire first time in the BoB but they have already encounters in the May  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.9.231.120 (talk) 15:48, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

message: it would appear that the design of the Me 262 derived from or in parallel to this aircraft. The tail and wings appear identical, only angled back more in the 262 for COG reasons. The overall package is similar, as are the landing gear. Seems worth mentioning.  Idumea47b (talk) 21:05, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Me 262
Talk:The Panida Theater

message: This theater is not in the National Register of Historic Places listings in Bonner County, Idaho. It is probably in the Sandpoint Historic District, refnum = 84001100, but this needs to be confirmed. Can someone with access to the Nomination name check if it is a contributing property. If so, put the district infobox here with the theater as cp. KudzuVine (talk) 23:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: NRHP
Talk:Hunt–Morgan House

message: Nice article, glad that User:FloNight developed it.  Odd that the property is not separately listed on the NRHP, although it was covered by HABS, it was the cause for formation of the Blue Grass Trust for Historic Preservation, and it has its own National Park Service webpage.  It will be nice to see a HABS pic or two added, also, and perhaps an explicit footnote to info in the HABS record of the site (in addition or instead of the external link to HABS) could be added too.  Lots of sources available on this one, more so than for most regular NRHPs, it seems.
I think the article name could better be Hunt-Morgan House rather than The Hunt-Morgan House, and start off "The Hunt-Morgan House ...".  I think names excluding the word "The" are usually more appropriate, and I note that "Hunt-Morgan House" is the name used in the Navbox for Museums of Kentucky included on the page.  I would rename the article by moving it to that name but i don't want to step on any toes about it, it is not that important. doncram (talk) 13:41, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. I was already thinking about doing it. I put it at the top of my To Do List for today since you agree. FloNight♥♥♥ 16:19, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Development of article

message: How many slaves did Hunt own and how were they treated?
What influence did he have on the murderous white supremicist, his grandson, John Hunt Morgan? Blumrosen (talk) 10:48, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slavery
Talk:List of Puerto Ricans missing in action in the Korean War

message: Tony,  I noticed that there was one name missing from the list "Colon, Euripides A" (RA51082061) - although his actual name was "Amy-Colon, Euripides" who went missing in action on February 6, 1952 with seven other men of the Company G, 65th Infantry.  None of them were ever recovered.  He is listed in the NARA list and also in the KoreanWar.org list (under Amy-Colon). When I view the list of Puerto Rican unaccounted for here:  https://www.dpaa.mil/portals/85/KoreaAccounting/pmkor_una_PUERTO%20RICO_20200710.pdf, there are 167 names not 122 as this article states.  I am not familiar with making edits here so I am sending you this information.  Thanks.  Figgeeys (talk) 02:34, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Name of "Colon, Euripides A"
Talk:Taunton State Hospital

message: Don't mean to be a noodge, but "uniqe and rare" is sort of contradictory. "Unique" is an absolute term, and if something is unique it is one-of-a-kind--a step beyone rare.PurpleChez (talk) 16:49, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Unique and rare

message: In the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Toppan article, this hospital is referred to as the "Taunton Insane Hospital" -- is that article incorrect or was that a valid name for this hospital at some point? If so, it should be mentioned here. --NotTheSwimmerDotOrg (talk) 06:46, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Taunton Insane Hospital
Talk:Tombstone tourist

message: Wikipedia Adminstration or other contributors- I would like review of this article towards determing as to where it might fail to meet Wikipedia policy and standardsCyberlucy1965 02:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: This article was nominated June 11, 2010 for merge. It is tagged as its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. It has no references and the proposed Taphophilia article has only one source. Combining the two will still give one weak article but at least it will be sourced. Otr500 (talk) 06:36, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge request
Talk:1978 National League Championship Series

message: So this article is written like a "personal reflection, personal essay or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia's author's personal feelings about a subject, or presents an original argument about a subject" --- says the 2017 banner put at the top of the article. If that is the case, then why isn't it also on the 1976 and 1977 NLCS articles, which have a very similar feel? Or on many other such summaries? I'm just happy there's information here about it --- one's memory gets fuzzy after 45+ years. 57.140.28.36 (talk) 21:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  seems to be inconsistent standards
Talk:1981 National League Championship Series

message: Regarding this edit: I have started a discussion at the baseball WikiProject discussion page on aftermath sections. Feedback is welcome. isaacl (talk) 05:08, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This content? This has nothing to do with the 1981 NLCS. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:23, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Aftermath
Category talk:Indigenous Australian people

message: Why no category for Torres Strait Islanders? There are more of them than of Indigenous Tasmanians. Should it be called just Torres Strait Islanders? Hugo999 (talk) 01:05, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  q from 2008 

message: The category currently say "People of South Sea Islander descent may be included by popular culture". I'd suggest that is not the usual understanding of Indigenous Australian people at all. The usual understanding is that Indigenous Australians only include Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, not "kanakas" (apologies for the language) as well. I suggest we remove the reference to people of South Sea Islander descent. Boneymau (talk) 23:08, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Have done so now, given no reaction. Boneymau (talk) 04:38, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of South Sea Islander descent
Talk:1985 National League Championship Series

message: Why did the Dodgers have home field advantage in this series? Back in those days, home field advantage rotated between the two divisions. The Padres had home field over the Cubs in 1984, and the Astros had home field over the Mets in 1986. The Cardinals should have had home field in 1985, yet the Dodgers did. The Cards also had a better record than the Dodgers. Does anyone know why this was the case?76.126.138.82 (talk) 03:30, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Home Field Advantage
Talk:Taftville, Connecticut

message: Extends as far north along Route 97 to just beyond C Street (including all of 3rd Street); as far south along Route 97 to Maennerchor Avenue; southwest to Pratte Avenue; west to hunters Avenue; east to Shetucket River (north of Route 169 bridge). --Polaron | Talk 14:48, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for opening a discussion section here.  I note you put a location description into the NRHP infobox, as "Route 97 and Route 169 in Norwich, Connecticut".  That's apparently not exactly the location field available in NRIS, which instead is "N of Norwich at CT 93 and CT 97, Norwich" (per the NRHP.COM page here).  I am not opposed to editing/clarifying NRIS location descriptions in general, if you are knowledgeable and can do better.  I assume that a route once numbered 93 is now numbered 169.  But here, does the new language suggest it covers the length of those highways throughout Norwich?  The NRIS location description suggests it is basically just around the intersection.  And, your additional more detailed information provided above is based on what?  I presume it is based on your comparing the small set of UTM coords given in NRIS to a modern google or other map view.  This approach can give an approximate idea of the extent of a district, but as discussed elsewhere the selected UTM coordinates are too few to support making a map of the district that is accurate at a detailed level.  It misses specific exclusions of properties that are modern intrusions or where owners objected, so statements like "all of a given street is included", if based on just UTM coords, should be avoided.  Also older coordinates in NRIS for CT can be shifted off by a hundred yards or so, due to the 1985 datum coordinates change;  the Taftville listing was in 1978.  Please do clarify what is your source of above information.  For the moment, though, I suggest using the NRIS location description in the infobox, updated for route number change. doncram (talk) 16:10, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  extent of historic district
Talk:Catholic Church in Africa

message: Due to recent war crimes trials in the Hague, Geneva, and in Brussels, more information has spread on the current situation of the Roman Catholic Church in Africa, specifically in especially war-torn nations such as Rwanda and Somalia. I hope to fully reference every note-worthy piece of history of the Church in Africa and invite all to help. Thanks, AJ24 02:59, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

message: For the history of this section, see Talk:List of African popes (formerly African pope) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/African pope. - Fayenatic (talk) 21:57, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern African ''papabili''
Talk:1970 United States postal strike

message: The USPS didn't exist in 1970.  USPO Department became USPS July 1, 1971.  Article needs to be renamed.  House of Scandal 06:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem

message: What about the other unions in the USPS? What was the role of the National Association of Letter Carriers, for example?
Georgejdorner (talk) 15:51, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other unions 

message: No mention if the strike and following negotiations led to better working conditions, improvements in building maintenance, or changes in pay/wages.
Since these were the major reasons for the strike, any follow-up or lack thereof needs to be included/mentioned as part of the outcome. 2600:8800:50B:6700:C23F:D5FF:FEC5:89B6 (talk) 04:25, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Outcomes" section 

message: Infobox and "conclusion" both give eight [8] days as the length of the strike.
Why does the opening sentence state "two-week"?
Last I knew, 8 days is one day over ONE week and 14 days is exactly two weeks.
Somebody is playing fast and loose with SIX days ! ! !
If the discrepancy cannot be explained, how about replacing the "two-week" phrase with "eight-day"? 2600:8800:50B:6700:C23F:D5FF:FEC5:89B6 (talk) 04:43, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length of strike 

message: — Assignment last updated by Public-historian-90 (talk) 19:15, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: HIST 121 - U.S. History since 1877
Talk:1999 National League Championship Series

message: This article is incredibly biased in favor of the NY Mets. Who gives a shit about what Chipper Jones said? And why is John Rocker referred to as a 'hothead?'
It needs a MAJOR edit job. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.170.223.149 (talk) 07:16, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Formal request has been received to merge Grand Slam Single into 1999 National League Championship Series. The term is used to describe one single play in that series. That is it. 69.118.34.185 (talk) 13:16, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal