lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Caesar III

message: Would you agree on that the soundtrack is to a large extent influenced (via Hollywood perhaps) by this. Scoo 12:49, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since its a somewhat old game, I thought to ask here, is there an enteties barrier / maximum in ceasar III? I have a city with 20.000 inhabitants, and suddently most of my wood / clay facilities stop producing, causing the city to callapse. Jasperwillem (talk) 00:33, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: question

message: Just to let any editors and/or readers know this, but the massive amount of unstructured information did not appear acceptable to my eyes, thus I decided to redo this with better structure in how the article on this game is presented.  I hope that people will appreciate the effort I am putting in or have put in to making this a better article for all to enjoy. ;-) GUtt01 (talk) 12:51, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality or Quantity - Why this article is being redone 
Talk:Hand transplantation

message: The article currently mentions "a 26 year old woman". They recently uploaded the video with more details: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgaMZT1Z2dw  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.91.69.2 (talk) 12:51, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: UCLA hand transplant now public

message: Could someone pls add infomration about how the nerves are joined up? Maybe start the page on "nerve repair" or "nerve reconenction" -- thanks. 
Hand transplant is highly controversial in the media, especially fiction. You know the nice guy loses arm in an accident and gets the replacement arm of an executed serial murderer. Then the "killer arm" will overtake his personality and he will go on wielding an axe to continue the killing rampage. Some people allege that this is not just horror fiction, but in real life body cells can transmit one's personality to another guy and so it may happen one day. This should be addressed in the article. 195.70.32.136
:That's the most absurd thing I've ever heard. (Or at least one of many.) Hosterweis (talk) (contribs) 13:53, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It happens to be part of the plot of a major video game. See: Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty PirateMonkey 09:16, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Could

message: My initial reason accessing the hand transplantation page was to gain some sort of insight into the long term functionality that transplant recipients may be able to achieve. Such a person would obviously never be able to attain the level of functionality necessary to become a concert pianist, they probably would not even be able to play the piano at a high level. 
However, I would be very interested to know if such a recipient would be able to, for example, use their new hand, or hands, to lift a kettle, fill it with water, boil it, put a tea bag into a mug, add milk, pour in the boiled water, stir, and then remove the used tea bag. I feel that this article could be improved by addressing the practical ways in which such a transplant would be used. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alanleonard (talk • contribs) 21:04, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long Term Functionality 

message: A face is not an organ. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.239.181.106 (talk) 05:37, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wait a minute... 

message: For some reason there is information about the first successful bilateral hand transplant in the U.S. but there is no mention of when it was first done successfully in the world. That was in Lyon, France on January 12, 2000. Patient name was Denis Chatelier and head surgeon was Jean-Michel Dubernard. http://www.handtransplant.com/TheProcedure/HandTransplantHistory/tabid/96/Default.aspx  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.184.228.156 (talk) 04:45, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: If it is not there you can add it. If you do this, you would need a reference. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Referencing_for_beginners --Mark v1.0 (talk) 17:57, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is there not information about the first successful bilateral hand transplant?
Talk:WinDbg

message: Microsoft refers to it has WinDbg and not Windbg, I suggest changing the topic title. -- Shawn12341234, 05:20, 15 December 2005 
: Warrens moved the page to "WinDbg" on 17 Jan 2006.  I made a few extra corrections to spelling and capitalization just now. - Lawrence King 06:41, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correcting capitalization 

message: The article is tagged as too technical. Is this justified for something as inherently technical as a debugger? Possibly it could do with a brief additional explanation of what debugging is for the non-expert, but I don't see any point in making the entire article comprehensible to all. Pol098 (talk) 13:02, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too technical? 

message: Some of the links (like http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163833.aspx ) no longer works; I don't know the exact process on how to insert web.archive.org links  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.74.231.19 (talk) 21:36, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links expired/changed
Talk:Gazumping

message: That all land is or is not owned by the crown is a complete red herring.  It matters not one jot whether this is the case or not - gazumping could STILL occur and DOES occur in some countries where there is no monarch.  So I intend to remove (otherwise possibly factually correct) information which has no bearing on the article.  Paul Beardsell 19:18, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  all land is owned by the crown - an irrelevance 

message: The term gazumping has also been adopted in Ireland.
Cf: http://www.propertyireland.ie/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=29&Itemid=60
Apparently it's a word of Yiddish origin, though I can't quickly find a reliable reference for it. This is as close as I've come:
http://www.phrases.org.uk/bulletin_board/26/messages/399.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.48.43.61 (talk) 15:10, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ireland 

message: Shouldn't this article be titled "gazump"? Huw Powell (talk) 01:17, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No. See WP:NOUN. "Titles should be nouns or noun phrases." Mooncow (talk) 17:27, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  article title 

message: It looks like the term in Canada is "shadow flipping". Is this the same thing? --Munchkinguy (talk) 16:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canada
Talk:Akagera National Park

message: This article is disappointing in that it has almost nothing to say about the period of the park before the Rwandan civil war of 1991-94. In the decades before that, Akagera was one of the most amazing national parks in Africa. I visited it repeatedly in the years 1984-89; though small, in diversity and accessibility to wildlife it was on a par with the best, and more untouched than most. Admittedly facilities were lacking - which may account for its level of diversity. It’s destruction during, and especially after the war, with animals being deliberately wiped out prior to de-gazetting about 60% of the original park, was an ecological crime of the first magnitude. And it wasn’t just poor settling farmers who were responsible. I visited what remained of it again in 2016; the amount of wildlife visible despite re-introductions was a poor shadow of the park as it was. The article is correct on the diversity of habitat; it is the diversity and quantity of inhabitants that is lacking. Ptilinopus (talk) 04:10, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Instead of complaining about the lacking info in this page : ADD it!! Since you are so knowledgeable about this PA, I'm sure you have reliable sources at your disposal. I look forward to read it. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 07:27, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disappointing
Talk:Charlie Skelton

message: Where did the information about the porn film come from? From watching Space Cadets, Skelton doesn't seem like the kind of person who would do something like this. ( Davehard 21:38, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Porn Films 

message: A website he runs with Alan Connor, an esoterically funny (if you geddit) wikipedia-style and themed site, called The Pooters (http://www.thepooters.com ) needs a page on here. 
I believe the name for the site --dunno about content-- comes from a series done for BBC television (via Talkback Productions production company "C4"), see here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/guide/articles/p/pootersthe_66602850.shtml. 
I suggest a Google or similar ... (done here: http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4HPEB_en___GB205&q=the+pooters ). 
Thx, Jimthing 02:16, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Pooters 

message: When did The Guardian become a magazine? It's a newspaper (which happens to have a magazine on a Saturday) although Skelton's reports about Bilderberg are actually only being featured on The Guardian website, so in fact this should probably read "2009 saw Charlie Skelton covering the secret Bilderberg Group meeting in Greece for the website of The Guardian".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.16.51.186 (talk) 21:20, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Guardian 

message: I think this well researched Guardian (Web Site) article is worth referencing considering the constant misinformation regarding the Syria situation. Hopefully - one day - a little more of this kind of truth will written into the history books. Iraq, Libya, Syria, (and God knows how many other before) next on the list: Iran, Venezuela... http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jul/12/syrian-opposition-doing-the-talking  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.145.77.195 (talk) 03:32, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skelton's Guardian (Web Site) Syria 
Talk:Beam crossing

message: This article had false information, AFAIK. The LHC has five experiments, not eight as the article proposed. Correct the article if I'm wrong.
A correction: LHC has a total of 6 experiments: 4 main experiments, and 2 smaller ones. The points in which the two beams cross, though, are only 4 (the 2 smaller experiments don't have dedicated crossing points, but use the data from the beam crossings made for 2 of the bigger experiments). I'm correcting the article changing "five" to "four".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.141.229.55 (talk) 16:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Nick Rose Day

message: Quote : If you wish to prevent this article from being deleted, the way to do so is to provide verifiable evidence.<br.
May I ask what is wrong with simply asserting notability ?  To provide evdience requires that one be involved in the phenomenon, at which point, surely, one's view is open to challenge on the ground that one has a vested interest in the topic and the entry. SockpuppetSamuelson 13:57, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Psilocybe azurescens

message: I removed this from the text, in spite of the reference to Paul Stametes book. That is because *this is not a real species*. Stametes is clearly confusing the names of two beachgrass species Ammophila arenaria and Spartina maritima. I'm unsure which of the two would be an accurate identification of the dunegrass he notes from the Astoria, OR area. Peter G Werner (talk) 17:34, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Ammophila maritima"

message: I was trying to identify the differences and I noticed that there are many pictures of P. azurescens with brown/orange spore print on the web that makes it even more similar to Galerina marginata. I don't know if there should be a note on the page warning about this similarities.
The main difference then is probably that P. azurescens should bruise black/blue.  --Arthurfragoso (talk) 23:14, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Looks very similar to the poisonous ''Galerina marginata''
Talk:Mdina

message: mxpule Could someone make the pictures fit nicer in a table or something?
:appears to be done. 「ѕʀʟ·✎」 23:14, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nevermind

message: I'm sure many people consider the view magnificent but I don't think the statement belongs in the article (that way). Someone famous saying the view is magnificent, sure, why not. Lots42 (talk) 15:10, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a nice view, but you have a point. Maybe something like, 'from its position it commands a view of much of the island'?  That would be more of a fact.. 「ѕʀʟ·✎」 03:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  View 

message: According to what we learnt at school and books the Arabs where those who did Mdina smaller and built a moat around it. The Roman moat was near St. Paul's Church in Rabat  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelb1983 (talk • contribs) 20:16, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: is almost certainly wrong. It seems like the Phoenician name was for the Grand Harbor & its port city at Cospicua. See Talk:Malta and Talk:Melite (ancient city). Other mistakes: Melita was the Roman name. Melite was the ancient Greek name for the island and the Byzantine Greek name for the city the Romans had renamed Melita. — LlywelynII 03:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Phoenician name
Talk:Psilocybe weilii

message: Identification Idications
Cap: Gold-Brown while young to Milky-white when mature. Wavy Edges.
Sporeprint: Chocolate to Purple-Brown
Habitat: Northern Georgia. Red Clay Soil. Often in clusters below Loblolly Pine (Pinus Taeda)
Season: Fall after it begins to cool.
Im not sure why changes are being made, but i dont like them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Warriorsoul (talk • contribs) 01:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

message: Botany is good, but wikipedia is an encyclopedia anyone can edit as well as hopefully, anyone can read and understand. For me, the article reads like a botanical text, obscured by Latin & requiring much clicking to find definitions. In the interests of not sending the reader to another page so frequently (or switching off completely), can we have (even in brackets) some regular English language descriptors? I started but it's a pain. Manytexts (talk) 15:15, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  technical jargon
Template talk:Psilocybin mushroomsx

message: Is this template really necessary?  Is it helpful?  It is growing quite large.
And it has the unintended effect of when you google search for any psychoactive mushroom, all the other ones come up.  That is quite annoying.
Should we get rid of it?
Alan Rockefeller (Talk - contribs) 07:40, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this here? 

message: Created subgroups for the various genera, should abbreviate the entries with just the species (or genus abrev. species).  Would shorten this a lot and make it less overwhelming. Zodon (talk) 08:49, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grouping 

message: This template should be called Psilocybin mushrooms instead of Psilocybe mushrooms.  There are many psilocybin mushrooms listed that are not in the genus Psilocybe.   Alan Rockefeller (Talk - contribs) 16:31, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and have boldy performed the move. Sasata (talk) 06:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Named incorrectly
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Gay Nigger Association of America (6th nomination)

message: The archived deletion review of this AfD can be found here. -Ikkyu2 07:33, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Archived deletion review

message: * Keep
(Hey, you didn't sign your vote!  Who are you?!) Roy Al Blue 14:26, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes

message: Exactly why is GNAA a speedy keep?
The voting shows if anything overwhelming consensus delete. 132.205.45.148 19:47, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Because notability is not a deletion criterion and this has already been voted on seven times. --causa sui talk 20:26, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy keep?
Talk:Sao Shwe Thaik

message: 1) The coats of arms shown in the article was apparently not that of Sao Shwe Thaik. It was that of the socialist government led by U Ne Win (1962-1998) that toppled the parlimentary government led by U Nu (1948-1962) of which Sao Shwe Thike was the head of the state. The pinion and the paddy crops are apparently the symbols for socialism. (Somehow, this coats of arms is still being used by the present military government of Maynmar.) 
2) Sao Shwe Thaik was not the head of the state during the whole period of 1948-1962. There was another person named Mun Win Maung (an ethnic Karin) who served as the president (head of the state) of Myanmar for some years (although I don't exactly remember from where to where). Zeyaraun 02:13, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracies 

message: Do we have sufficient references for this article? RJFJR (talk) 17:59, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  references 

message: Are we sure that စဝ် is pronounced ? I'm not familiar with this word, and it isn't listed at , but I would have thought  or  would be more likely. —Mahāgaja (formerly Angr) · talk 12:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 
Talk:Husking Bee

message: I would like to say that they sound nothing like taking back sunday. Husking bee's sound changes constantly so how is it possible that this group taking back sunday changes with husking bee Exactally to a "T"? It is impossible and this is yet annother attempt to make a japanese band annother coppy of an american one. I would like for it to be edited out.
------
Yep, I think the Taking Back Sunday comparison is incredulous. Seconding the proposed changes. If I only knew Japanese I'd read up on some of their info online. Yui-kun (talk) 16:54, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Saying
Talk:Order and disorder

message: Why not redirect to the long-range order subsection (currently 1.2)? 99.226.208.129 (talk) 02:25, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: —Pengo 11:56, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long range order redirects here 

message: The lede mentions "rotational" degrees of freedom and then parenthetically mentions "ferroelectric ordering", but "ferroelectric" is not discussed in the main part of the article. And the blue link to "Ferroelectricity" makes no mention of "degrees of freedom". Attic Salt (talk) 03:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rotational degrees of freedom (ferroelectric ordering) 

message: My question is this: Can it be justifiably said that there is order in everything, even chaos? It would seem so. If not, it would be as if the laws of physics had been suspended. Even the most chaotic events are happening according to the laws of physics, the only possible exceptions being indeterminate states of subatomic particles and the behavior of matter and space in the vicinity of a black hole. It seems to me that the idea that there are boundaries where order ceases to exist and chaos begins is a subjective opinion. Thanks. 2600:8801:B011:300:B09F:3FEF:E7EB:2AC5 (talk) 12:25, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can't find what I'm looking for in this article.
Talk:Peter DeFazio

message: During the recent rewrite I removed two statements. The first statement I removed had to do with the fact that DeFazio has lost support. The second statement was that he is rumored not to be running in 2006. No creditable evidence was given for either statements.Davidpdx 14:40, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The "neutrality" tag was placed on the article in March with no further commentary on the talk page. The material in question seems to be the detailed description of DeFazio's considered runs for U.S. Senate in 2005 and 2006 made by an anon. The major part of the edit is here. The addition doesn't seem to be egregiously POV to me, but it definitely needs a citation and some cleanup. I added the citation tag; anyone object to removing the POV tag? --Esprqii (talk) 01:13, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality tag
Talk:American College of Greece

message: The Deree College article was merged with the American College of Greece article. Users can view the last version of the Deree College article before the merge here. The decision to merge the articles was based on consensus here. Gnkgr (talk) 14:34, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deree College article merged  

message: Due to the fact that the article looked like a corporate brochure and was almost exclusively based on self-authored promotional sources and press releases, contents were cut to what can be supported by the sources that were impartial and reliable. 
As this article was made into a stub, please proceed by ONLY adding content that can be referenced from independent sources from now on. 
Previous contents of the article are preserved in article history and can be accessed here if you feel that any content might be worth retrieving for citation. Gnkgr (talk) 22:34, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good day. You have removed basically ALL information. I do not believe that this is appropriate. The page as it was, contained accurate info and it was indeed sourced at the college's page. What is presented right now is not accurate, as for example there is no mention of the other two schools the college incorporates.  Marinosk (talk) 17:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please review guidelines such as WP:Reliable sources and WP:NPOV. If you'd like to restore any contents of the article they should be supported by sources. So if you have to recommend sources that would be acceptable by the above guidelines please feel free to mention in reference of any contents they can support. Gnkgr (talk) 16:44, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your reply. We have reviewed a number of pages of Wikipedia before proceeding to the changes we made and here is a list of colleges in the US that have a number of references to their own webpages: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babson_College, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Notre_Dame, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northeastern_University, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_College, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PennWest_Clarion, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockton_University, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rider_University, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_North_Florida, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Utah and a number of others. My question is why in the above cases the reference to their own websites is acceptable and in ours is not? Marinosk (talk) 18:00, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cutting back on article contents
Talk:Kimball House (Atlanta)

message: 168.9.44.2, a vandal IP, changed the date that the place was torn down from 1952 to 1959.  I have not changed it back, since I don't know the date and couldn't find it online.  Is this sneaky vandalism?  Can anyone confirm the real date?  THanks, delldot | talk 14:49, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's correct. National Park Service, Atlanta: "the legendary Kimball House hotel, whose demolition in 1959...." - mako 02:01, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

text: But then again, the link Jolomo provides (http://msit.gsu.edu/dhr/pullen/selections.asp?id=fivepoints) has a picture of the parking garage taken in 1952. Not sure who to believe. - mako 02:29, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked it up in two books, and the date is 1959 in both. That settles it for me. - mako 22:58, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism?