lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nocturne (band)

message: i think this needs a photo O_O;
perhaps the bands logo? or something of them together?
i assume itll have to have no copyright on it, or get the permission from the one who owns it... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Trynstopme (talk • contribs).
:Since all works generally have copyright by default, finding a photo without copyright will be difficult. Since certain forces within Wikipedia have been cracking down on "Fair Use" images lately, it's best to send a request to the band to try and get a verified public domain or GFDL image. It might be much easier to get a photo a fan took at a concert or something. --Eyrian 19:14, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo?

message: I'm doing POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 20:14, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV Tag 

message: I've marked the bio section for tone, as it is in a somewhat promotional, non-professional style. Phrases like "hopelessly mixed reviews" and "in a breakaway move" are of primary concern here. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 20:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  tone problems
Talk:Olaus Borrichius

message: I suggest the information of this article be moved to Ole Borch which is his danish name and a redirect be put up... any objections?--Thorseth 10:13, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Delirium 09:02, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move this to the Ole Borch article
Talk:Sense and Sensibilia (Austin book)

message: Not much to the article. Barely enough to whet the appetite.Lestrade (talk) 18:35, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Then do something about it. -- Palthrow (talk) 21:15, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sparse

message: As per Sense and Sensibilia (Aristotle), why is the title not simply Sense and Sensibilia (Austin)? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you know the answer to that one... 71.221.29.195 (talk) 00:43, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Johan Kjeldahl

message: I moved a block of text out of one section, into the preceding section, to make that first section more coherent.  I figure, "why" he was working at a certain lab, goes better with "where" that lab was, than it does with "what" he invented while there.  If it looks real bad to anyone, you can easily move back -- no text has been lost.64.252.176.169 (talk) 18:03, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Carlsberg Laboratory today will be removed from Commons soon, as it has been identified as a copyvio from http://www.crc.dk/spocc/. If the image is of interest for this page, it might be re-uploaded locally under fair-use. --Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair use doesn't apply since anyone can go take a photo of that building that'll do as a free replacement. And someone already did, :File:Carlsberg Laboratory.jpg. 77.215.191.91 (talk) 08:39, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Impending image deletion
Talk:Isaac Asimov book series bibliography

message: I have Asimov's books "the end of eternity" and "the gods themselves". They were good, so I wanted to see what other books he wrote. But this is is incomplete, because those two books are not listed here. Also in the author's introduction to "the caves of steel" Asimov writes that "the naked sun" published in 1957 was his 20th book. I  believe that he knows better how many books he has published.
Therefore this list is largely incomplete.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.71.154.32 (talk) 18:34, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing entries 

message: I've made a chart over Asimov's and other author's publications within the Robot, Empire and Foundation series. I'm asking if this would be an added value for the Wikipedia readers? If so, please give feedback of its validity. I might have missed something. Here is the link to the page that includes the chart (which is collapsed as default): User:Rixn99/sandbox2.
Rixn99 (talk) 18:12, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add a chronological table of publications?
Talk:RTÉ Raidió na Gaeltachta

message: In one part of the article it is stated that there are no official (JNLR) listenership figures for the station and later on in the article it is stated that a JNLR survey gave listenership as 3% while the infobox gives a figure of 0.7% ? So are there or are there not listenership figures for the station and why doesn't it carry advertising ? Netgeek-UK (talk) 21:36, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many listeners does it have ? 

message: The whole of this section should be removed - it's off topic. It could be fitted into another article. If non-one complains, I'll remove it. Hohenloh  +   15:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Background
Talk:Seventh Letter

message: The final sentence of the introductory sentence reads "Assuming that the letter is authentic, it was written after Dion was assassinated by Calippus in 353 BC and before he was in turn overthrown a year later." So the letter was written after Dion was assassinated but before he was overthrown? So Dion ruled for a while as a corpse? Obviously there has been a typographical error or omission here. Leecharleswalker (talk) 19:48, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsensical sentence in introductory paragraph? 

message: no idea who wrote this summary but it was easier to understand than the actual letter, good job 2804:431:C7E3:593A:A4FC:48F1:4064:7052 (talk) 00:18, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  good summary 

message: I have not read "R. Ledger, Re-counting Plato: A Computer Analysis of Plato's Style (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989)" nor have the book, to go to pages 148-50, but what is the computer analyzing? Handwriting style, ink sourcing similarity (chemical analysis), etc etc.
"computer analysis" is congruent to "instrument analysis". What were they computing? Langadakis (talk) 23:56, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  computer analysis
Talk:Paddy Quinn (Irish republican)

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 15:09, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: addressed by WP:IMOS, two WP:IMOS dose not exclude there use. --Domer48 (talk) 18:33, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irish name
Talk:Matt Devlin (Irish republican)

message: The article states he was buried with "full military honours", but the link provided does not say this. Also an Óglaigh na hÉireann funeral conducted with full military honours would include a firing party, and he died post-decommissioning. Scalpfarmer 14:26, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation requested
Talk:Sex and the Single Girl

message: I removed the "unsourced" tag as none of the information of this article needs to be sourced:
*content of the book:  obviously derived from reading the book
*1964 Natalie Woods movie obviously based on the book
*Sex And The City obviously inspired by Helen Gurley-Brown's book
Maikel (talk) 10:17, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced?

message: I've just now added:
:The Four Square paperback edition published (in London) in 1964 includes "£ove $tory", an unpaginated 32-page supplement by the cartoonist and illustrator John Glashan, between pages 128 and 129.
-- and I've done so without a reference.
The reference is the book. Get hold of this edition of Sex and the Single Girl, and you'll find Glashan's story right there.
"Illustrated edition" would sound a lot less strange than "supplemented edition", but "£ove $tory" doesn't illustrate the book; instead, it's a bonus. I'm open to improvements to "supplementary", but I hope that they'd be suggested by people who've actually seen the book in question. -- Hoary (talk) 23:27, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Supplemented edition
Template talk:Presidents of Serbia and Montenegro

message: I have added the former President of Serbia and Montenegro (SCG) to this template since there was no template beforehand. Even though the nations were different, I have decided to add the President of SCG to this one since it would be silly to have a template with only one name in it. - Thanks, Hoshie 19:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  addition of SCG
Talk:Capt. Jim's Popeye Club

message: Ironically, the bits about Cindy Eckman's contributions and them not meeting Wiki standards don't themselves meet Wiki standards. I don't see how an encyclopedia article can include its own history. 
And on the Atlanta/Officer Don version, I can't swear that it never came on at 5pm, but when I was watching it, it was definitely 4:30pm. And it doesn't seem like calling the ooey-gooey prizes, "groceries" hits the nail on the head. I mean, there were no bottles of windex or toilet paper or anything. It was all snack foods for kids, Gordon's Potato Chips, cartons of juice, stuff like that. 72.145.148.59 19:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Military Order of the Tower and Sword

message: The list of "current" knights and officers includes several deceased persons. Prince Albert for one died in the 19th century.
If the word "current" has a different meaning from its common one in the context of the order, this should be made plain. Otherwise the list ought to be split in current and past, or the section should be renamed "Noteable Knights and Officers".--UKcrow93 (talk) 11:28, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current knights and officers?
Talk:Cutoff (disambiguation)

message: The link Cut-off is not appropriate if referred to electronics. I have opened a stub named Cut-off (electronics), which I believe more appropriate: please check my work. Thank you. :) Daniele.tampieri 20:37, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cut-off in electronics 

message: Maybe someone should add, that cut off is the name for the position behind the dealer in poker games. --62.214.201.64 12:17, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cut off as poker position 

message: What about a cutoff in geography?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.2.73.254 (talk) 15:07, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography
Talk:Shades (story)

message: Perhaps most texts here should be moved to Wikisource?--Jusjih (talk) 00:44, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In this case, no need.  It's a short text.  Nihil novi (talk) 05:27, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Which portion is the translated source text? s:Shades seems to have the introduction only.--Jusjih (talk) 03:57, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The translated text is part of this Wikipedia article—which is where I think it should remain.  Nihil novi (talk) 04:49, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section to be moved to Wikisource
Talk:Shadow Dawn

message: The plotsynopsis only covers like the first third of the story, and Sandeni is not impervious to magic, but The Deceiver shot it with something that stripped away all magic from that territory. 89.134.18.50 (talk) 14:12, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot is stub and needs correction
Talk:Competitive equilibrium

message: I wonder whether this article, and Static equilibrium (economics), should be merged with Economic equilibrium.  I suggest any discussion take place at Talk:Economic equilibrium#Merge?. --Coppertwig 19:17, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: I guess recursive competitive equilibrium comes under competitive equilibrium. So, can't there be another sub heading under competitive equilibrium as recursive competitive equilibrium?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raj2026 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like a very unusual approach. If it's significantly notable (see WP:NOTE), then maybe it should get a small mention here and its own article. But it also looks like the references for it aren't published in peer-reviewed journals, which makes me think it's too minor to include. CRETOG8(t/c) 02:51, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: recursive competitive equilibrium

message: Dr. Gjerstad has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Gjerstad has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:
*Reference : Steven Gjerstad, 2004. "Market Dynamics in Edgeworth Exchange," Microeconomics 0401006, EconWPA.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 16:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Gjerstad's comment on this article 

message: Can you justify the claim that ‘Competitive equilibrium... is the traditional concept of economic equilibrium’? Fig 15.B.14 in Mas-Colell et al’s ‘Microeconomic theory’ illustrates a point x* which is Pareto optimal and is a point of equilibrium in the traditional sense, but is not a ‘competitive equilibrium’. Or am I missing something? Colin.champion (talk) 08:37, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Taking silence for assent I’ve modified the first sentence of the article. Colin.champion (talk) 12:12, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this really the traditional concept?
Talk:Dinerral Shavers

message: Someone has placed a photograph of the boxer Ernie Shavers where a photo of a jazz funeral should be located.
This is the second time this has occurred with entries about the Hot Eight Brass Band and about Dinerral Shavers.
Please remove this photograph and replace it with the correct photograph.
--gab 19:17, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No "joke"; just a case of two different people carelessly uploading images entitled "Shavers". -- Infrogmation 01:30, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone is attempting to make a joke... 
Talk:PAC MFI-17 Mushshak

message: Iran not buy it.
منبع اشتباه است. بی ربط است High k7 (talk) 20:35, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iran buy??? 

message: Pakistan is licence manufacturer of super mushshak not a country of origin. Dl ff (talk) 14:12, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: We generally only list the country that builds an aircraft under license when the variant has its own article. See HAL Ajeet for another example, as it only lists India, not the UK. In some cases, we have listed both, but it usually depends on how involved the original manufacturer was in making the variant. BilCat (talk) 21:18, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: sir thanks for giving this information.. Dl ff (talk) 03:18, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country of origin??
Talk:NRP Sagres (1937)

message: This article should bear the current (since 1961!) name of the ship, not one of a dead nazi icon. --77.12.236.123 (talk) 07:51, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 
Talk:Wu Jia-qing

message: Why added some statements and more encyclopedic contents on Wu Chang: I have no conflict on this, since this is not my sport. I am into horse racing and a lawyer-judge. But I just happened to have seen the entire finals in Studio 23: a) Wu should have won, no problem with this, since he was flawless until the dire last hit, when, unluckily, on the 11th rack, he failed. So Appleton grabbed the luck. And I saw in TV how Appleton wept and knelt amid the UK Flag banners and guests. So, I added the immortal quotes of heartbreaking Wu. It was so notable. Both are not Filipinos, I am Filipino. And this is the first ever in the world, here, in the Philippines. I hope that my explanation, is evidence, that my edit is notable and not copy paste, with all due respect.--Florentino floro (talk) 09:04, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Explanation

message: He might as well have given up his "ROC" citizenship, because you don't really have any status in Taiwan without a household registration.   I'm pretty sure he knew this when he applied for his mainland house hold registration.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by G2343432432 (talk • contribs) 04:04, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citizenship
Talk:California Crossing

message: Not sure about release date: an AllMusic bio and a Canadian periodical have 2001; every other source seems like 2002. Thanks. Caro7200 (talk) 23:17, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date
Talk:Silingi

message: The quote this article has is coming from a website which has a draft translation (explicitly described that way). But it really isn't right. Click on the link and look at the Greek and Latin which are the source being worked on for the draft. (You can plug into google translate of course. It gives enough to show you the pretty big problems.)--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 18:06, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ptolemy quote is a problem
Talk:List of Indigenous peoples of Taiwan

message: The title of this page is wrong.  It does not include all ethnic groups who live in Taiwan (including the majority ethnic group).  Either fix the text or fix the title.  To not do so is just sloppy.  Badagnani 19:23, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest we just include the majority group in the article, since there is already an article specifically dedicated to Taiwanese aborigines, which already lists all the groups listed here.  Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 20:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Shouldn't the word aborigine be in the title? 71.251.47.193 (talk) 21:37, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Title of page is wrong

message: Why aren't the populations given in this article, as they are for the comparable Wikipedia article about mainland China's ethnic groups? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 05:46, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Populations?!
Talk:Ralph Tester

message: * Dob: he was 39 at some point at BP, but it's unclear when.
— Matt Crypto 19:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Things to clarify, need sources

message: I thought I'd boldly remove the stub tag: I don't believe this article could be developed much further at the present time, simply because there isn't a lot of published material about Ralph Tester. A "stub" tag doesn't really buy you much in the case where an article can't really be grown much more. — Matt Crypto 17:27, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub
Talk:Volume Logic

message: According to their website, support for iTunes 7.0 has been introduced (though honestly i guess it is still beta)
66.71.75.74 19:26, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  iTunes  7.0 

message: Moved this deleted comment to Talk:
"-  Platronics will not provide refunds for windows users. Do not buy this product if you have ITunes 7.0 or lator for Windows." originally added.
Although I support the extra warning, I agree with the deletion: WP=encyclopedia.  I think "does not work with iTunes 7.0 for Windows" provides enough consumer warning. --Lexein 11:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vendor issues 
Talk:Let Me Roll It

message: Started a new section which is just an overview of the live versions --Cjones132002 (talk) 21:37, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Live Versions 

message: We should change the genre back to blues-rock because it's clearly blues-rock. The riff of the song clearly matches the description for blues-rock. Hopefully me or anyone else will be able to find a reference to support the fact. ― C.Syde (talk | contribs) 06:02, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre

message: The article states at one point "Some critics[who?] saw the song as a pastiche of John Lennon's sound"
I can answer that, but I'm not good enough at Wikipedia to put it into the main body of the article (and besides, every time I do edit an article someone always reverts it back anyway).  Here's one answer:
Roy Carr & Tony Tyler, in their book "The Beatles: An Illustrated Record"
In the 1981 edition, on page 110, while reviewing the "Band on the Run" LP, the authors state,
"Humor is also present: in (long-delayed) answer to Lennon's cruel "How Do You Sleep" ("Imagine" LP), Paul fights back -- gently -- with a beautiful and totally sympathetic impersonation of Lennon's own idiosyncratic vocal/production style, "Let Me Roll It" (complete with Arthur Janov-style primal whisper at the close).  The understatement of this track contrasts with Lennon's misplaced viciousness to a marked degree."
I think this adequately answers the question of "who" and gives details.  Perhaps someone else can edit the article in a way to include the missing information, and hopefully other people won't go in and revert it.  I think I've given enough information to cite the source, and if not, any missing information can be found online.  In fact, the book quoted has a Wikipedia entry, so it could even be hyperlinked.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.100.154.66 (talk) 17:24, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critics who consider this song a Lennon pastiche
Talk:Treaty of Windsor (1386)

message: Wrong! This is NOT the oldest in the world, by any means. Even as far as Windsor is concerned, the similarly-named Treaty of Windsor signed in 1175 between the King of England and the High-King of Ireland, is older. Seneschally (talk) 15:30, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It would better be described as the oldest 'non-defunct' diplomatic alliance, then. What would be the best way to put it? Tschild (talk) 22:02, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have moved the section about Churchill invoking the treaty to Anglo-Portuguese Treaty of 1373 because it is clear that he invoked that treaty, not this one. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:26, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Churchill quote moved to correct article 

message: Is someone who did an MA (at a second rate university) really someone to be classed as a “historian”? He studied history but doesn’t seem to have pursued an academic career in the subject. Can’t we find any better source/authority? 88.212.130.194 (talk) 10:24, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ‘Historian Matthew Winslett’
Talk:Wilberforce Colony

message: Let's start this talk page with a question of form. Should it be "American blacks' or 'American Blacks'? I know the capitalization is the present politically correct way, but I would appreciate discussion on this point. --Dumarest 19:36, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Black [cap initial letter] or black

message: Thanks to the kind soul who realized that I had the incorrect Au Sable - Ausable river, and fixed it. --Dumarest 12:33, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The river
Talk:Bollinger Bands

message: It seems like every reference on the Internet to Bollinger bands has a "®" sign. Is this just a marketing ploy, or should the Wikipedia page also display it? 129.180.137.98 (talk) 09:22, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you don't normally use that in writing.  See MOS:TMRULES.  I don't think it's a marketing ploy; I'm no lawyer but I'm asuming Bollinger does it to be able to more easily enforce his trademark.  I can't imagine why we'd feel the need to do it.  The article mentions that it is a trademark quite prominently; that seems adequate for our purposes. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 19:33, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "®" sign 

message: I reverted the deletion by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Isambard_Kingdom and corrected the broken citation. This is an important use of Bollinger Bands outside of finance that was published in a peer-reviewed journal. John Bollinger, CFA, CMT (talk) 18:08, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bollinger Bands Outside of Finance