Talk:Haematopoiesis

message: I deleted the following:
:Embryologically, in about 30 feet of gestation the blood precursor cells arises from the yolk sac mesoderm.  In esccense the first hematopoetic organ is the yolk sac, then the liver and spleen will take over in week 5 as a temporary but major hematopoietic tissues.  Skipping over to about the 5th month of gestation, the bone marrow then becomes increasingly important as the hematopoietic organ.  After birth, the blood cells are derived from stem cells of the bone marrow.  The bone marrow also produces T-cells that migrate to the thymus where it becomes immunocompentent in the paracortex.  Most cells mature in the bone marrow(become immunocompentent).  
:The main site for hematopoiesis is the bone marrow (after birth).  Under normal conditions, the production of blood cells can adjust rapidly to the need of the body, increasing several-fold in a short time.  The bone marrow is found in the meduallary canals of long bones and the cavities of cancellous bones.  The first cavity to form is in the clavicle--this becomes clinically.  Of clinical importance is the sternum when diagnosing certain types of Leukemia.  
:Taken from Dr. Yin's Notes at Ross University School of Medicine 11/08/2005.  
The copyright status of these notes needs to be clarified, and wikification and sourcing is lacking. As for the haematopoiesis drawing - please don't upload drawings from your lecture notes on Wikipedia (unless your name is Picasso). Instead, consider OpenOffice or another graphic design package. JFW | T@lk 11:53, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image and college text

message: This page has no etymology for Haematopoiesis. Haema- clearly means blood; poiesis probably means generation, but my knowledge of Latin and Greek does not allow me to name its etonym — my guess is it's Latin. Rintrah 12:00, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: Without wanting to get into an edit war, why does "Hematopoiesis" redirect to the English "Haematopoiesis" spelling instead of the other way around?  Isn't Wikipedia based in the U.S. and aren't most of the readers American?
:From Wikipedia:How to copy-edit: Note that the English language edition of Wikipedia has no preference for American, British, or other variants of the language. It is important, however, for usage to remain consistent within a single page.. I, myself, prefer British spelling, although I am an Australian. Rintrah 03:33, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've edited the spelling of "haematopoiesis" to maintain consistency within the page (which was fairly random before). I chose to use the British spelling due to user preference, the preference of the Wikipedia spell-check tool for the British option, and because the original page title uses the British spelling.  If there are any real problems with this, let me know and I'll revert it. Jeyradan (talk) 20:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  English vs. American spelling? 

message: Haematopoiesis is hard for the unscholared to know, and he/she will search for "blood formation" or the like; How do we make this page available for those who search for it? 84.42.163.144 06:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Blood formation now redirects to this article. Maybe there's similar titles that should be added? E.g. blood creation... I wonder if it would also work if blood creation would be added to the blood formation page after the redirect. Then all similar user searches (e.g. formation of blood, formation of blood cells, blood creation, creation of blood cells etc. etc.) could be added to blood formation to "funnel" all users towards blood formation and consequently, to this article. Do other Wikipedians have any experience on this? :) A. Rad 15:23, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blood formation 

message: Hi all, I have uploaded this image showing locations of fetal hematopoietic stem cells from Plos Biology to commons because I needed the German version of it. Just in case you would like to also include it in the English article, this note. the original figure legend is included in commons. --Dietzel65 (talk) 16:20, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  fetal hematopoiesis 

message: In recent years a new model has been proposed for haematopoiesis.
Read more: 
Shouldn't this be discussed in the article?
Pstragier (talk) 13:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Myeloid based model vs. classical myeloid-lymphoid dichotomy 

message: It may be a small thing itself, but keeping in mind that the image is huge, I suggest moving the textbox to inside the chart to reduce the size. Is the latter image better? Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:30, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative position of text box 

message: Shouldn't this image have the names:
# "rubriblast" instead of "proerythroblast"
# "prorubricyte" instead of "basophilic erythroblast"
# "rubricyte" instead of "polychromatophilic erythroblast"
# "metarubricyte" instead of "orthochromatic erythroblast"
? --Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty | Averted crashes 16:21, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: doi:10.1111/bjh.13445 JFW | T@lk 11:12, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review on bone marrow environment 

message: Shouldn't be added that haematopoiesis also occurs in scapulas and clavicles? I don't remember at the moment, I'm going to check in a book later. Ai Leen! (talk) 17:46, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locations 

message: Current date format is not consistent and appears in several formats.
Looking through early versions of the article, intial date format was all numeric, then a YYYY MMM DD format appeared in February 2014, which is not acceptable according to WP:DATE.  The next format to emerge was a D M Y format, in version 593783192 in February 2014, an accepted format.  I'll toss on a hatnote related to this date format momentarily. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 16:34, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article date format 

message: Word 197.250.227.157 (talk) 17:41, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human anatomy 

message: English 2405:3800:879:70DF:0:0:0:1 (talk) 11:03, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bone marrow 

message: British voice 77.246.50.119 (talk) 07:06, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haematopoiesis 

message: I came here to learn about bird blood. (Turning elsewhere, apparently not all of their bones are hollow.)
Unfortunately, everything here seems human-specific, or if it isn't, it's mixed in enough to not be easily distinguished.
I think this page should either be renamed Human Hematopoiesis, and the same thing done for the Hematopoietic System page and anything else with the same problem, or it should be rewritten to account for other animals.
In either case, I think it's a lot of work and also a big decision, so I'm opening a Request for Comment.
::Horatio Von Becker
101.100.148.176 (talk) 01:49, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the  tag, for the following reasons: (i) I cannot find any evidence that WP:RFCBEFORE has been exhausted, let alone tried; per WP:RFCNOT, RfCs are not for discussing a page rename; there is no WP:RFCCAT (did you not see the big red error message "Error: No RfC category specified"?). Just discuss the article content in the normal manner, there is absolutely no need to go straight for a full-blown thirty-day formal WP:RFC at all. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 09:52, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accounting for Animals