Talk:Science education

message: Until there is no article here about pedagogy I've linked to eo fr pl Pedagogy. To be fixed later. AL.
I remove the links. I confused Science education and Education Science. Arno Lagrange 11:40, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are a number of links on this page, but few true references.  --zandperl 20:17, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: References?

message: This article would appear to be written primarily from a negative viewpoint. It seems to violate the NPOV guidelines, especially seeing that references aren't given for the statements that are made.
I'll come back in a couple days and clean up the article unless references have been cited or arguments are made on the talk page.
*Examples
**"In many U.S. states, K-12 educators must adhere to rigid standards or frameworks of what content is to be taught to which age groups."  -- True...but a reference should be cited.
**"Unfortunately, this often means teachers rush to "cover" the material, without truly "teaching" it." --Seems like a generalization. Definitely needs a citation. I'm sure this isn't the case all the time.
**"In addition, the process of science is often overlooked, such as the scientific method, and critical thinking, producing students who can pass multiple choice tests (such as the New York Regents exams and the Massachusetts MCAS), but cannot solve complex problems." --Another generalization. Again, I'm sure that this isn't true as much as this statement seems to be implying it is.
**"Although at the college level American science education tends to be less regulated, it is actually more rigorous"  --Citation needed
**"with teachers and professors fitting more content into the same time period."  --Citation needed. Not to mention this seems to contradict the arguments in the second sentence.
**"In 1996, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences of the U.S. National Academies produced the National Science Education Standards which is available online for free in multiple forms. Its focus on inquiry-based, rather than memorization-based, science education was somewhat controversial at the time, but has been shown to be more effective as a model for teaching science, if less amenable to multiple-choice tests."  --Citation needed
**"One the most approachable and important documents about science education is the volume "How People Think" by John D. Bransford, et al. In this compact and highly digested volume, the fruit of massive research into student thinking is presented as having three key findings:**"--Citation needed (a volume unknown to the international science education community is unwarrantedly applauded here)
 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Micz (talk • contribs) 08:01, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Negative views & lack of references 

message: I don't feel that the Science education article is an appropriate place to put links for commercial companies that provide science equipment. These sites have very little to do with the content of the article. Not to mention there are hundreds of science equipment suppliers. How would you pick which ones to include and which not to? I feel that this article should focus not on equipment, but on pedagogy & curriculum.
Benwildeboer 11:17, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercial supply company links 

message: IMHO, the external links section should provide the reader with resources related to the teaching of science. I don't feel it should be a repository of links to lesson plans, in-class activities, or science sites for students. The link to ERIC databases was the only site previously listed that I though included the type of information that should be referenced by this site. Any other thoughts or opinions on the matter?
  
--Benwildeboer 18:54, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: As this section is totally US-centric and may not reflect the rest of the world, I've changed this heading to "United States" in order to make it more commensurate with the "United Kingdom" heading below. Liverpool Scouse 22:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Science Education standards"

message: In the section about the United States I've added a link to the article on the PSSC and claim that this was the first of the reform efforts of the era.  This could be wrong.  Reform of mathematics might have preceeded establishment of the PSSC.  Will someone please check and correct if necessary.  Thanks. PeterEasthope (talk) 17:03, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to the Physical Science Study Committee 

message: Speaking Out on the "Quiet Crisis" Strengthening science education is the key to 
securing our energy future, says Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute's president.  Scientific American by Brendan Borrell  December 5, 2011  (page 94 to 99 in print)
See Shirley Ann Jackson
97.87.29.188 (talk) 00:07, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[SciAm]] resource 

message: The link in the column on the left is to an Italian article about the "Science of Education", in the sense of teaching method in general, roughly corresponding to what would be taught in English-speaking countriea in a Faculty of Education, so there is no point in linking to it. I couldn't find a corresponding Italian article specifically about science teaching.Campolongo (talk) 10:48, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like it should be removed. TimidGuy (talk) 12:02, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to the Italian

message: I have removed copyrighted content taken from here. I have left the paragraph that was added along with the lists by the same user as it doesn't appear to a blatant copy/paste like the list was, but there may be some close paraphrasing that needs changed/removed. Sarahj2107 (talk) 15:19, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyrighted content

message: what should this article scope be in this regard? Fgnievinski (talk) 02:23, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  formal vs. informal education 

message: I've created a new article on White House Astronomy Night. 
Suggestions for additional WP:RS sources would be appreciated, at Talk:White House Astronomy Night.
Thank you,
— Cirt (talk) 15:19, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  White House Astronomy Night  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Science education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060614211608/http://www.publicagenda.org/research/pdfs/rc0601.pdf to http://www.publicagenda.org/research/pdfs/rc0601.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:12, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 特色3 (Small).JPG
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:23, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Support the May proposal to merge Scientific teaching on the grounds of overlap and because it's a stub, whose scope is already better covered here. Klbrain (talk) 12:37, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 04:32, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: — Assignment last updated by Maeflowerbailey16 (talk) 14:14, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Communicating Science

message: Erklärt mal 2A02:3030:8:A0CA:6090:1EC4:4B49:21B9 (talk) 20:07, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warum ist die Erde flach?