lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Buck O'Neil Bridge

message: I can't point to a source on this other then my own memory. I'm certain this bridge used to carry US 71. I do not know if it did at the time the bridge opened but signage at Downtown Airport referred to US 71 well into the late 70s, possibly early 80s. US 71 was not on Broadway at that time and may have been moved to the Paseo Bridge with I-29 & I-35 around the time airline operations were moved to Kansas City International Airport. With the airlines gone and no other numbered route to replace the shields updating the signs was probably not a high priority. My mother told me the Paseo Bridge was formerly a toll bridge and US 71 may have relocated to it when the tolls were removed. The freeway between downtown and I-29 had been known as the Broadway Extension and had no highway number assigned to it for about 20 years before US 169 was moved to this route. North of I-29 the freeway had been US 169 but it followed I-29 to I-635 to enter Kansas on the Platte Purchase Bridge multiplexed with its parent US 69. This resulted in northbound I-29 multiplexing with southbound US 169 before realigning to this more logical route. I no longer live in the area so I can not easily source this from old newspapers at the library.
Skywayman 05:20, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Five and a half years later after I posted this I'm surprised no one had a follow up. I came across a 1958 Missouri highway map recently that instantly reminded me of this post and explained the signs I saw growing up. It appears that US 71 was routed on what is now Missouri Highway 9 before the freeways were built. The signs I saw were probably directing traffic to Harlem Road to connect with US 71 then on Burlington in North Kansas City. If US 71 was moved to I-29 & I-35 and 9 extended from Riverside to North Kansas City on the old 71 alignment around the time the airlines left MKC for MCI no one probably got around to redoing the signs for a very long time. So Broadway bridge may never have carried US 71 after all but US 169 indeed was on the alignment in my previous post until the mid 90's. Skywayman (talk) 11:48, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: US 71
Talk:Lefevre Peninsula

message: The Peninsula's Correct Name is <BR>
Lefevre Peninsuale  i.e. Lefevre as one word and lowercase f.<BR>
The name comes from Sir John G. Shaw-Lefevre
* SA State Library, Place Names of South Australia 
* Lefevre Peninsula Primary School
Fixed Article too.  
--DarkAxi0m (talk) 23:29, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrected Name 
Talk:Melvin Price Locks and Dam

message: As noted in my last edit of the article, the dam does not appear to be even in Missouri at all. See the referenced map. The article should probably have an Illinois map instead of the current Missouri map. Backspace (talk) 10:21, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not in Missouri
Talk:Generative Modelling Language

message: Hi Sarge, what's wrong with this page, why did you mark it cleanup and wikify? --Havemann 16:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I find this article quite confusing for both newcomers and people who know about programming and computer graphics.  If it supposed to be about a programming language as the title implies it lacks information about the language syntax (see :Category:Programming_languages for lots of other programming language articles) and what makes it special compared to other languages commonly used for procedural 3D modelling (as supported by many 3d CG packages - COFFEE (Cinema 4D), Maya Embedded Language, POV-Ray Scene Description Language).  The current article text mostly consists of information on the concept of generative modelling (although lacking a clear distiction from other Procedural modeling concepts) and on the interactive interpreter and its features – it might be better to turn this article into a software article or one about Generative Modelling as a general concept. 
Imagico 15:44, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Subject 

message: Much of the page's content, including images, is taken from the GML homepage, http://www.generative-modeling.org/GenerativeModeling/1, which is actually listed in the article. This is why the tone did not seem encyclopaedic. I have no suggestion that would keep the page well intact.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boijunk (talk • contribs) 00:21, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism 

message: This article (Generative_Modelling_Language) uses the UK spelling of modelling but the site of the people that are responsible use the term 'modeling' not 'modelling', so although it's proper English it's not properly describing the actual project.
I'm hesitant about changing it myself and leave the decision to others like the original author.
Wwhat (talk) 16:37, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Talk:Ranken Jordan Pediatric Bridge Hospital

message: Ranken Jordan is, indeed, one of five such facilities in the nation because of these unique qualities:
*Ranken Jordan is not a long-term care facility
*It is subacute - it is "in mode of rehabilitation and transition" -- according to the November issue of the St. Louis CEO magazine interview with the CEO/President of Ranken Jordan  --Tmaty 14:49, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 1 of 5 facilities in the nation
Talk:Summertime Blues

message: The Who recorded this song at least 2 times in 1967 before the Blue Cheer version was released in 1968.  Member(s) of Blue Cheer modeled their version on the Who's performance at the Monterey Pop Festival.  This is clearly backed up by recordings in the Monterey Pop Festival 4 CD box set and the remastered CD of Odds & Sods.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.229.24.95 (talk) 03:28, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The Who and Blue Cheer

message: Why does the Who song "Heaven and Hell" redirect to this page?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Happy quack (talk • contribs) 22:51, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Heaven and Hell

message: I think it would be worth a section on the story and the themes  -  teenage America in the 50's, and the resentment of male/paternal authority, as represented in the deep-bass passages. (Do we know who the artist was?) Valetude (talk) 17:21, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Analysis of song? 

message: In May 2014, 7-year-old Angelina Jordan won Norske Talenter with her sultry version of Summertime. Onerock (talk) 14:57, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Angelina Jordan version

message: Spouting the myth that Blue cheer were heavy metal. Heavy metal was only defined as such in the 70's by rolling stones reviewer. It's proto-metal. But they are just psy/hard/prog rock.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.173.121.145 (talk) 17:16, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Please stop

message: The weird sound of Eddie's dad doing the spoilsport talk is a big part of this record. By rights, I would have thought he'd have had a credit. Any idea who he was?Valetude (talk) 15:43, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who was Pop's voice? 

message: There are apparently two versions of the original Eddie Cochran 45 on Liberty...one has a reverb effect augmenting the spoken lines in the song, and the other omits the reverb effect on the spoken lines. I have copies of both versions and the difference is very noticeable. More info is needed on how this oddity happened. 75.133.31.68 (talk) 00:39, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two versions of the original Eddie Cochran release on Liberty Records?
Talk:Hand of Vecna

message: Please see the discussion for the merge here. Put comments there, not here. — Frecklefσσt | Talk 13:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Is it me, or is that a *right* hand on the cover of that book? Rissa (talk) 17:21, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hand
Talk:Eye of Vecna

message: This article should be merged with Hand of Vecna.  Both articles are somewhat short and their History and References sections are nearly identical.  Redundant information is to be avoided when possible.  Each artifact could have its own section in the new, merged article.  The merged article could be called Vecna artifacts or some such thing.  Even Eye and Hand of Vecna (or Hand and Eye of Vecna) would work.  The old articles would be turned into redirects to the new merged article.  Just my thoughts. — Frecklefσσt | Talk 13:15, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Schlafly Beer

message: This article may not have been written by anyone associated with Schlafly, but most of its information came from Tom Schlafly’s own book. For future information added to this page, I think citing from this primary source leads to the page sounding like an advertisement. Louie Mantia (talk) 00:21, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotion
Talk:Taiko: Drum Master

message: I am changing Taiko: Drum Master into a page only for the North American release of the PlayStation 2 game of the same name. Every other game (Japanese releases) will be under Taiko no Tatsujin. Kaixaken 16:12, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting This Page With Taiko no Tatsujin 
Talk:Antarmahal

message: Antarmahal is an extremely bold attempt by rituparno ghosh in portraying the decadent self-corroding socio-cultural milieu of bengal in 19th century. Greed for power, money and status drove the self-proclaimed all-powerful land-lords to submerge in extraordinary levels of luxury and seduction. While the impotence of the lead character (the Italic textzamindar) is a bit cliched, Rupa ganguly succeeds to transcend cultural barriers with her bravura performance. Her performance as a neglected woman on biological clock, with mixed emotion towards the second queen is awe-inspiring. 
The film relies on the sexual politics deep inside the landlord's house and has been shown in a manner which is unprecedented in Bengali as well as in Indian cinema. The gruesome aspect of non-consensual marital sexual congress has been shown in the most drastic form. The scenes of the presence of a priest in the bedroom during sexual congress to help the queen conceive is  a poignant portrayal of such pain. The film goes on to derive sexual implications of building clay Goddess Idols ("Durga"), which is widely held as tantamounting to blasphemy. In addition to that, possibly for the first time in Indian cinema, instances of human-animal sex has been clearly explained in this film, and the consequences of the same have also been detailed out.
The ending scene is one of the most moving scenes in this movie where Soha Ali Khan's (the second queen) face is used in beautiful allegory to that of the goddess. With such excellent choice of cast the director succeeds in turning a morbid dark sexual drama into something worth remembering.
192.223.163.5 08:04, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Glenn Close

message: Andrew Lloyd Webber said that the project is not moving forward afterall, but not because G. Close is not trying.https://www.broadwayworld.com/article/Andrew-Lloyd-Webber-Reveals-Production-on-SUNSET-BOULEVARD-Film-Has-Been-Stalled-20211006 I think it's fair to say the movie won't come to fruition.72.174.131.123 (talk) 02:59, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sunset Boulevard movie
Wikipedia talk:Deletion review/Myg0t (second)

message: Since 23 May this page has been nothing but a vandalism magnet. Can we get it protected/semi-protected so users aren't wasting their time reverting what should be a static page? -- nae'blis (talk) 16:15, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done so. If there are no objections, I'll leave it this way. --maru   (talk)  contribs 23:33, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks maru. I'll check over at WP:RFPP to make sure it got closed there, too. -- nae'blis (talk) 04:21, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protection
Category talk:Concurrent computing

message: Is there any reason why this category should not be merged with :Category:Parallel computing ?  Dyl 16:15, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This question is outside my area of knowledge, but I'll blunder on anyway. The articles Concurrent computing and Parallel computing explain the differences. As I understand it, parallel is a subset of concurrent (which, if we follow that logic, the parallel cat should be a subcat of the concurrent cat). Both categories have enough entries to justify keeping both. I suspect that a good number of the articles in the parallel cat don't fit the strict definition and should be moved to concurrent. My preference is to keep both, unless proper catting reveals there are only a handful left in parallel. There are enough people on WP who follow these fields that hopefully they will weigh in and correct me. JonHarder 17:08, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket digestion

message: It would be helpful if a schematic diagram of the UASB is included in the topic.
Thank You
Kir360 (talk) 13:25, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Schematic of UASB

message: I am suggesting to change the name of this article to upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. This is the commonly used name. EMsmile (talk) 02:18, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change name to Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor
Talk:Sequencing batch reactor

message: Sequencing in "Sequencing Batch Reactor" doesn't mean anything from a language perspective. Sequential is more proper. I know even scientific literature is crippled with example of authors calling SBR "Sequencing..." but the process doesn't not actively "sequence" anything (to sequence is a transitive verb), hence the use of the present participle is wrong.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riennn (talk • contribs) 08:40, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: SBR abbreviation

message: I am not sure that this statment is true : "The installation consists of at least two identically equipped tanks with a common inlet, which can be switched between them".
I've seen a few SBR called systems with only one tank. 90.19.136.215 13:55, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The sequencing can take place in one tank with multiple compartments also. I will see if I can source something and make the edit or you can. --Justanother 14:58, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error ? 

message: This page is word-for-word copied from: http://www.answers.com/topic/sequencing-batch-reactor 198.165.42.51 15:33, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure it is not the other way around? Many sites rely on wikipedia for their "answers". --Justanother 15:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Think you will find most things on answers are copied word for word form wikipedia! It enables the site to get higher ratings. The answers site is out of date as the environmental technology template colour has now been changed to blue Alex 16:11, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism? 

message: There seems to be no allowance for it.  Bio-CLC (talk) 11:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there no scum? 

message: This seems to be a lesser known technique for treating fecal sludge. What are its advantages and disadvantages? When is it most applicable and when is it least applicable? What are the trade-offs of bubbling air from the bottom versus spraying of the liquid into the air? How efficient is it at eliminating PPCPs (pharmaceuticals and personal care products) and chemical contamination in general? How can one hour of aeration be enough? What percentage of a new batch is activated sludge from the previous batch that has been left in the tank? How significant are the odors that are generated?  Bio-CLC (talk) 11:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there an evaluation of how efficient SBRs are compared to other technologies?
Talk:Municipal solid waste

message: Municipal solid waste is not distinct from the general term "waste" and I do not believe they should be merged.--Alex 07:53, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, but see Talk:Waste. --Macrakis 12:34, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Appearantly, Johan Vennik developed a way to to process 96% of the domestic waste, without incorporating incineration. Vennik plans to set up a pilot factory in Breda (the Netherlands).EOS magazine, april 2013
Perhaps mention in article
KVDP (talk) 14:10, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Johan Vennik's recycling process

message: The usage and primary topic of  is under discussion, see talk:garbage (disambiguation) -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 04:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "Garbage"

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bank of Waste. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Hog Farm (talk) 19:19, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bank of Waste" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: I`m confused..why is this picture here ? 
The info box appears to be completely irrelevant 2600:1702:2340:9470:AC44:28A1:B377:F8E6 (talk) 23:13, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grand Coulee Dam ?
Talk:Chaifetz Arena

message: "Stevie Nicks will play Friday, June 13. Tickets are $45, $65, and $95, and can be purchased online at MetroTix.com, over the phone by calling MetroTix, or in person at the Chaifetz Arena box office."
Ha!  Self-promote much?--69.155.6.3 (talk) 22:40, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Community foundation

message: I've added a references tag to this section.  At the moment it's simpy a list of community foundations, some of which may be notable.  We need independent references that show that experts in the field consider these notable.  This should also give us sourced information we can use to put some context around the names listed so that we can make the section encyclopedic.  If we can't get references in a few weeks I'll go ahead and delete the section. -- SiobhanHansa 16:58, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks DIDouglass.  I've redone the US section to include the top three from gifts received and grants made tables and the top 4 for total assets (top four because of the note about them controlling 24% of total assets).  I don't think monetary size is the only significant factor we could look at - so if anyone has other ideas for good metrics or notability criteria please speak up!   Also, any similar surveys for other countries would be great.  I'll also try and at least stub articles for the foundations mentioned and red linked over the next few weeks. -- SiobhanHansa 17:45, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable community foundations section
Talk:List of The Muny repertory

message: How is this different from The Muny? Should these pages be combined?  Also, I'd carry a comment from the other page that challenges whether this is the largest in the world.  Perhaps a clarification of what makes an operational theatre would be appropriate.--165.134.188.190 06:04, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Muny
Category talk:Unassessed film articles

message: If there are fewer talk articles in this category, does it mean that it is better for the project on the whole? --Siva1979Talk to me 16:28, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. The less talk pages in this category, the better for the Wikiproject. Iolakana•T 14:39, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's better because when you have less Unassessed articles, you know how your project is doing and how much to expand. Cbrown1023 01:57, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose?
Talk:Mass of the observable universe

message: We seem to be having problems with baryonic vs. all matter here. When reading, I assumed that the first paragraph was referring to the density from \Omega_{matter} = \Omega_{baryonic} + \Omega_{dm}, which shouldn't give nearly the same value as the stellar estimate of total baryonic mass. --Philosophus T 20:46, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What is Mass referring to?

message: Units should be in an upright typeface. Not sure how to do this myself in TeX without the SIUnits package. --대조 | Talk 16:22, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units 

message: Why is it all in CGS units? What's wrong with SI? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.7.20.133 (talk) 22:22, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units again 

message: I'm proposing to merge this article into the Observable universe article because I think the Matter content section of the other article gives a far less confusing treatment.  The distinction between estimates of stellar mass and total mass is not clear in this article.  The 2 references use wildly different approximations for the size of the observable universe (10 billion vs 14 billions light years) and the value of 3x10^{30}}kg for the mass of the Sun in the second reference is out by a factor of 2/3, so it's pure chance that they happen to arrive at the same value.
The discussion will take place here.
Cosmo0 20:24, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur.  I've entered a comment on the other talk page.  --Parsifal Hello 07:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No dissention, so I've completed the merge.  --Parsifal Hello 07:37, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger
Talk:Les Daniels

message: I don't think his work with Superman: The Complete History (also Batman, Wonder Woman) fall under the definition of graphic novels (i.e. A graphic novel (GN) is a long-form work in the comics form, usually with lengthy and complex storylines, and often aimed at mature audiences.). Roygbiv666 16:33, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They're just books, aren't they? These are the ones that cover the characters' history and stuff, right (at least those are the ones I have) so they're not novels, just books. Roygbiv666 23:51, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Specifically, check out http://www.chroniclebooks.com/site/catalog/index.php?main_page=pubs_product_book_info&products_id=4744&store=books for info. Roygbiv666 00:00, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Right, I've put them under "non-fiction" instead. Thanks PhilipC 15:16, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Stephens College people

message: Can anyone tell me what the difference is between stephens college alumni and people?  There are alumni (ie
Jeane Kirkpatrick & others) in people that should probably be in the alumni area.  If people is all inclusive, do we even need an alumni sub-category?  I would think people would be professors and the like.  I'm tempted to figure out which ones are really alumni and move them, but I wanted to hear from the wiki community in case there really is a distinction that I haven't thought of.HornColumbia talk 05:36, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Although I realize I am replying to your question over eight years after it was originally posted, I would point out that this category should include people affiliated with Stephens College who don't necessarily qualify in the faculty or alumni subcategories.--TommyBoy (talk) 19:32, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can reply eight years later then I can try for nine. David Henry Hickman, for example, served on the Board if Curators, and was highly influential in the development of the school; however he was never alumni or faculty. Grey Wanderer (talk) 04:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: alumni vs people