lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ci (poetry)

message: Examples? --Abdull 19:14, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Chinese poetry is one of the world's most important sources of poetry. The Classical Chinese poetic forms rival any other poetic forms, in terms of encyclopedic value. How could ci poetry have less than a "high" importance rating? Dcattell (talk) 14:57, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Status of importance of Chinese poetry

message: There seems to be some copyright violation the lead section of this article. 
Earwig's Copyvio Detector returned 66.8% with the source  on this article.
I'm not sure about the license of the website in question, nor am I sure about how to reword the paragraph, so could someone help me out?
Thanks! Rusty4321 talk contribs 20:44, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for checking - I can start rephrasing and adding additional sources - would be great if others following the page can help also. W9793 (talk) 18:33, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio in lead?
Talk:Mongol invasion of Volga Bulgaria

message: In the Battle of 1223 fought near the Itil bend, half of the Iltäbär Habdulla Tshelbir´s army were Merdis who were allied with the Itil Bolghars, and fought under the command of their Inäzörs (Grand Princes) of several Merdi peoples. Not a mention of them in main article.
Why Volga and Samara, which did not exist by name by the time. Their names should be only placed in brancets after the original names to write the correct history. Or is English Wikipedia writing only Russificaned Roshland history?
Please change also Ural River to Jaik River. The river was renamed only more than 500 years later to Ural River by the Russians.
 
JN
:The Bulgars and The Mordvas is the one nation at that time. D4kks (talk) 05:32, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the Merdis (Mordvas) are (again) forgotten
Talk:Berke–Hulagu war

message: The grammar is awful, for one thing,  There is a general lack of citations (always bad!)  The painting is not representative of the Mongols at all - surely, there are Arabic/Persian tapestries contemporary with the time that are more realistic than a  painter creating a work centuries later?  I may address some of this in future, using Chambers, Glubb, Morgan, and Grousset, but this is almost needing a complete re-write . . . one reason I am hesitant about working on this article is that the majority of editors have not written edit-summaries for their work - and I foresee conflicts down the line in trying to fix this one. HammerFilmFan (talk) 05:38, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ugh - start class is right!
Talk:List of Stanley Cup challenge games

message: Could we come up with a win/loss table similar to that in the main Stanley Cup champions article that would list the number of titles won, challenges lost, etc.? Jmj713 (talk) 14:38, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that would be a good addition. If we can keep Scorpion away, :-) I'll add it. Alaney2k (talk) 16:40, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Win/loss record 

message: I believe that Berlin Union Jacks in the 1909/10 (or a year after) should be renamed into Berlin Dutchmen. References: http://hockeyleaguehistory.com/Ontario_Professional_Hockey_League%20_1907.htm, Ernie Dubeau, Frank J. Selke. Also in this article nobody mentions Berlin Union Jacks but Berlin Dutchmen. Jambornik (talk) 16:40, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I wonder where Union Jacks came from. Possibly a future team for that town, or a future name for that team. Names for teams were not regularly reported in newspapers of that time. I can do some digging too. Alaney2k (talk) 19:50, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Berlin Dutchmen

message: I propose we change the Season-by-Season Summary to the table below.
Year	TimesCup Awarded	Champions
1893	1               	Montreal HC
1894	1               	Montreal HC
1895	2               	Montreal Victorias Montreal HC
1896	3               	Winnipeg Victorias Winnipeg Victorias Montreal Victorias
1897	2               	Montreal Victorias Montreal Victorias
1898	1               	Montreal Victorias
1899	3               	Montreal Victorias Montreal Shamrocks Montreal Shamrocks
1900	3               	Montreal Shamrocks Montreal Shamrocks Montreal Shamrocks
1901	1               	Winnipeg Victorias
1902	2               	Winnipeg Victorias Montreal HC
1903	3               	Montreal HC Ottawa HC Ottawa HC
1904	4               	Ottawa HC Ottawa HC Ottawa HC Ottawa HC
1905	3               	Ottawa HC Ottawa HC Ottawa HC
1906	4               	Ottawa HC Ottawa HC Montreal Wanderers Montreal Wanderers
1907	3               	Kenora Thistles Kenora Thistles Montreal Wanderers
1908	5               	Montreal Wanderers Montreal Wanderers Montreal Wanderers Montreal Wanderers Montreal Wanderers
1909	1               	Ottawa HC
1910	4               	Ottawa HC Ottawa HC Montreal Wanderers Montreal Wanderers
1911	3               	Ottawa HC Ottawa HC Ottawa HC
1912	2               	Quebec Bulldogs Quebec Bulldogs
1913	2               	Quebec Bulldogs Quebec Bulldogs
1914	2               	Toronto Blueshirts Toronto Blueshirts
: Two different things, really. The above is a summary of the article, while the existing table is a list of champions of the era. I've changed the heading to match. Maybe it belongs better elsewhere. I think maybe I'd moved it from List of Stanley Cup champions, but my memory is hazy. Possibly a merge of the existing table and the above would be the best idea. ʘ alaney2k ʘ (talk) 15:15, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I proposed a plan at your talk page yesterday. Please give your thoughts! Jmj713 (talk) 15:22, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season-by-Season Summary table
Talk:Russo-Swedish War (1590–1595)

message: "Three years elapsed before Sweden, in May 1595, agreed to sign the Treaty of Teusina (Tyavzino, Tyavzin, Täyssinä), which recognized Russian conquests and restored the borders predating the Livonian War."
:This is plain wrong, Teusina borders are most significant territorial gains of Sweden ever. If author means compromise not in comparaison of Schisselburg borders of 1323, but in comparaison with some de-facto situation during war, it should be clearly indicated. Studio357 (talk) 14:16, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Let's discuss here instead @Dushnilkin. Gvssy (talk) 23:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Result 

message: The redirect Twenty-Five Years' War has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 20:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Twenty-Five Years' War]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Second Anglo–Powhatan War

message: Several sources such as:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_military_history
http://homepage.univie.ac.at/kurt.mayer/histor1.htm
List this as actually the third Anglo-Powhatan war and place another in the 1620s. Does anyone know if this is correct? If so I will make the appropriate alterations. Unfortunately any books on colonial Virginia seem exceptionally scarce, especially here in Blighty and hence I can't read into the subject as I'd like to find out which is correct. Phunting 12:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Anglo-Powhatan War?
Talk:Highlanders (professional wrestling)

message: Reverting to keep the history section short - we don't need excessive detail, just a summary of events. --Jtalledo (talk) 09:55, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length 

message: Currently the wrestler names are directed to this article, shouldn't it be fixed and they should each have their own profile? Each one has their own history, shouldn't that be fixed that way? Govvy 12:50, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They had their own articles, but all they had in them was the exact same information that was on the team page so they were redirected for being redundant.-- bd (talk to me) (watch me) 13:06, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Okay for now, but later on we might need to give them their own profiles back. For starters they had single matches (jobbing) on WWE Velocity and I am sure I can find more out about each individual when I try. Govvy 13:42, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need own wrestler articles 

message: You think somewhere in the article it should mention that they have last names? The names they were using when they debuted as a team were Rory and Robbie McAllister.
:It's in the first sentence.«»bd(talk stalk) 15:30, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  McAllister 

message: They actually wrestled for Neo Spirit Pro Wrestling which operates here in my home city of Niagara Falls, Ontario. I saw them wrestle at a Canada Day parade festivities. I loved every minute of it and it's good to see them in WWE, although I hate WWE and love TNA. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.49.207.65 (talk) 00:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Their debut

message: According to his Myspace (), Rory is 31 years old, so that would mean he was born in 1976. Jackjackjackjackjack 13:44, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rory's Year of Birth

message: Why are they in the category Scottish professional wrestlers? It's only a part of their gimmick right? They're about as scottish as Roddy Piper himself! --Kaizer13 (talk) 11:20, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Uhh

message: Was the Highlander debut on ECW a permanent thing or is the SD!/ECW talent sharing program also encompassing RAW now?
24.128.53.252 (talk) 01:17, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It could be either. The ECW results did say that the Highlanders visited ECW, so that would imply they're still on Raw, bit it's posssible they've moved. However, the article is not changed until a reliable source is found. NiciVampireHeart (talk) 16:27, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ECW 

message: Why dont they have there own pages. They are well known enough. And they are the only tag team on the roster with out seperate pages. Cryme Tyme have about the same info on there pages and they get there own. please respond.--Adam Penale (talk) 20:07, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Own Pages
Talk:Gold (The Beautiful South album)

message: This used to appear on the page:
Many do not consider it to be an official greatest hits album, due to its simple repackaging of tracks and the similarity of its design to that of other "Gold" albums released by bands either currently or previously of the Mercury Records label.
It's NPOV - who are these many? If it's true then let's cite the source(s)! Tompagenet 19:22, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cite sources
Talk:Bulavin Rebellion

message: Is the constant use of 'Police State' necessary considering its modern derogatory/inflammatory connotations, as well as the fact that there are few contrasts with the Absolutism of Russia in Europe at the time as the 17th and 18th centuries were the heyday of European Centralisation and Absolutism. If Police State is used so much by the cited authors would that come under plagiarism?
Additionally also like to make a point of asking that if the article's authors are still active, they could look at the sources they already used and link it to the existing sentences please.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by NotAnotherNameGuy (talk • contribs) 04:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Police State' and lack of citations 

message: The link "Kondraty Bulavin" in the article Don Cossacks leads to this article, the Bulavin Rebellion. Within Bulavin Rebellion, "Kondraty Bulavin" leads to Kondraty Bulavin. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 01:19, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infinite loop
Talk:Pugachev's Rebellion

message: Yemelyan Pugachev is notable only in the context of Pugachev's Rebellion. Now the content is uselessly split between the two. E.g., section "pugachev's legacy" certainly belongs to The Rebellion article. `'mikka (t) 22:35, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All the info was originally in the Pugachev article, I moved most of it as you said to Rebellion. I don't really care if its merged. David Fuchs 00:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Support the merge, although we have separate articles for Kondraty Bulavin and Astrakhan Rebellion. --Ghirla -трёп- 17:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I humbly oppose merging. I think that there can be a wider discussion of the rebellion, without details of the life and personality of Pugachev, in an article of the rebellion. By the same token, an article of the life of this person needn't contain details of the rebellion. Just my unbiased and humble opinion. Thank you. Piercetp 22:30, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Wow. Since the last time I editing a lot of crap was thrown in. I would support merge. David Fuchs (talk) 00:43, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Meyer Prinstein

message: Can anybody definitively say how he spelt his first name?  This article is headed "Meyer Prinstein" but begins "Myer Prinstein".  In Google, 'Meyer' gets more hits but the ones for 'Myer' seem to be of better quality. Scolaire 17:58, 1 May 2006
Okay, over two months and no feed back.  I'm going to move the article now. Scolaire 19:24, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meyer or Myer?
Talk:Stockbridge, Wisconsin

message: RFD - Although I'm sure there was a good reason, can you let me know why you removed my recently added external link (http://www.city-data.com/city/Stockbridge-Wisconsin.html)? Tanthalas39 (talk) 20:57, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It look like possible spam. I have no problems if you want to put it back in. Those types of links can be spam in nature. Thank you-RFD (talk) 21:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No apology needed. I saw that you are active in Wiki:Wisconsin, and was just curious. I've never been there in my life; I just enjoy hitting 'random link' and editing, well, random things. When I fixed your reference link to be a little more friendly, I noticed your new external links are better, anyways. Tanthalas39 (talk) 21:29, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks for pointing it out! I updated it. Of course the pictures are right, I took them! Royalbroil 05:36, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Tuareg rebellion (1990–1995)

message: This page is in some ways a good artifact of how in the early 2010's most experts thought that Mali was essentially stable, this line especially: "Regardless of the connection with the Second Tuareg Rebellion of 2007 in Niger, the small size of forces involved in the 2007 Malian violence, and the wide support for the 1995 and 2006 accords among Malian Tuareg leaders, paint a picture of a largely successful peace process." (at the end of the Mali section)
My understanding is that the eruption of conflict in 2012 showed that the previously assumed stability was illusionary (see Mali War). Now it might be that the conflict starting in 2012 was largely separate from the conflict the ended in 2006, I'm not a Mali expert, but it would be a good idea for someone to at least mention that tensions around Tuareg autonomy were not settled once and for all in 2006  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.71.97.185 (talk) 20:25, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated
Talk:Weybourne, Norfolk

message: Check links Palmiped (talk) 06:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Check external links in article
Talk:George Gregoriou

message: Wow. Good thing I don't attend William Paterson University. I've read his articles and the man is a crackpot through and through ; there's not a single evil (or imagined evil), that he does not attribute to the imperialist America boogaboo, on the flimsiest excuse for evidence (or no evidence at all, as the case may often be). Perhaps mr.Georgiou would benefit from delving a bit deeper into Greek history while checking his preconceived notions at the door, seeing how his absolute views are rejected by the majority of Greek scholars these days, both of the left and right. On the other hand, maybe that's too much to ask from someone who laments the betrayal of Chinese socialism to "predatory capitalism", subsequently to Mao's death! (that cultural revolution had sure shown them capitalist pig-dogs, eh?)
As for America : being a person who antipathizes neoconservatism, the fundamentalist right, and the delirious jingoism of the current Dubya administration, it saddens me to see the "blame America first" fringe composing such a sizable part of the opposition to the neocons.
Where are the European-style true liberal, pro-market, anti-war moderates when we need them? 212.251.120.152 19:42, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tautological line bundle

message: In complex geometry (see for example the book "Complex Geometry" by Huybrechts) the canonical line bundle of a complex manifold $X$ with complex dimension $n$ is just $\Wedge^n T^{(1,0) \ *}X$ (i.e. the top exterior power of the dual of the holomorphic tangent space).  Notice that this is a complex line bundle, hence each fiber is a 2-dimensional real space.
In complex geometry, a tautological line bundle over a complex projective space is the dual of what is being called the canonical line bundle here.  At least this is the definition found in Huybrechts' book.  Perhaps a warning note should be placed in this article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 155.198.157.113 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 19 July 2006  (UTC)
:That concept is described at canonical bundle. -- Fropuff 06:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

message: I propose we move this article to tautological line bundle and then either redirect canonical line bundle to canonical line bundle or make it into a disambig page. I would prefer the former. We can put a disambig notice at the top of the canonical bundle article. -- Fropuff 06:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Geometry guy 00:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Yes, definitely.  Also the term canonical line bundle is ambiguous even within algebraic geometry.  There's the Canonical sheaf to deal with (which, it just so happens, is also a line bundle).  I think tautological is a better term for what the present article deals with, since it really isn't canonical at all: it depends on the structure of projective space.  Silly rabbit 19:04, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change proposal

message: The definition of the tautological bundle is missing the subset \lbrace(x,0):x\in\mathbb{CP}^{n}\rbrace since the vector 0 don't belong to any class.  NeoBeowulf (talk) 14:57, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct definition
Talk:Cipriano de Rore

message: I've always seen his name spelled Cipriano, and from the ghits it seems that this is a far more common spelling, and it's what Grove has. Compare Cypriano-170 and Contrast Cipriano-14,800 Anyone disagree with me moving the page? Mak (talk) 19:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The move proposed above was accomplished on 7 August 2006.  Noted by Lini 03:26, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Move from Cypriano de Rore to Cipriano de Rore - July 2006
Talk:Stemonaceae

message: Why no division or class in the taxobox?  Badagnani 20:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxobox problem
Talk:Quantum programming

message: I suggest we merge Quantum virtual machine with this article. QVM doesn't seem important enough to have a separate article. --Robin (talk) 22:12, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I am only a lay person, but it seems that in the example where the person dumps a quantum state there should be 16 states listed and maybe the output got cut off? --Craig Pemberton 08:20, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error? 

message: "Quantum lambda calculi are extensions of the lambda calculus, introduced by Alonzo Church and Stephen Cole Kleene in the 1930s.[...]
The first attempt to define a quantum lambda calculus was made by Philip Maymin in 1996."
I'm confused about what it means by it being introduced in the 1930s given that the first attempt to define it was in 1996? 91.125.244.198 (talk) 16:25, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quantum lambda calculi extensions? 

message: It might be better to rename the article "quantum programming languages", since the article is really about quantum programming languages or quantum instruction sets, as opposed to the abstract concept of programming a quantum computer. See, for example, computer programming vs programming language. --Robin (talk) 23:20, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: This article covers "Quantum Programming Languages" rather than quantum programming. You can program a circuit without a quantum programming language or even a quantum processor. This can be done with electronics, integrated circuits, or even just va instrumentation. Quantum programming is the manipulation of any quantum system for a desired outcome or experiment for the results thereof. For example, you can implement the  KLM protocol on a circuit board to generate a random number that would be as true a QRND as it would be if t were coded in assembly language for a quantum processor. 
I think this article need to focus on quantum programming of circuits and systems and not just programming languages because it's misrepresenting the terminology. OnePercent (talk) 19:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quantum Programming is NOT Limited to Instruction Sets
Talk:Dwight station

message: Two infoboxes is entirely ridiculous, quit with the little war, what is the benefit of two infoboxes? Everyone wants to use infoboxes, why not just expand the article? Oh wait, no one but me cares to do that to Registered Historic Places in Illinois. IvoShandor 19:34, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Could always query the stations project to add an optional NRHP date parameter to the infobox, instead of adding two clunky infoboxes, that have no aesthetic appeal, and, imo, make the page look really bad and really add no information. The only real use for infoboxes is introduce uniformity to a set of related articles, something adding two infoboxes directly contradicts. IvoShandor 19:45, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have posted at the Trains and the Stations projects asking if we can include an NRHP date, architect, and architectural style(s) parameter. IvoShandor 13:41, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Two infoboxes

message: I decided to place a split template at the top of the article's page. This article serves two purposes now. One is the original Dwight station that was built by the Chicago and Alton Railroad and the other is for the Dwight station built in 2016. The original Dwight station serves a historical purpose being on U.S. National Register of Historic Places whereas the current Dwight station serves Amtrak passengers. The splitting would give both articles two separate infoboxes instead of two infoboxes serving one article with one showing current Amtrak service and another for being on the historical register. Finally, both stations have separate geographical coordinates now. Splitting the article would assist Wikipedia editors in the future by giving two separate coordinates and help identify which station is which. FunksBrother (talk) 19:03, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This idea was so good that I have gone ahead and begun the split.  Cheers! Bigturtle (talk) 16:00, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requesting to split the article