lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Avery Schreiber

message: Lesliecomelastly (talk) 20:53, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

message: The information about The Dukes of Hazard appearance is most certainly wrong (it didn't appear on TV until 1979 and Waylon Jennings was the famous narrator/balladeer).  I don't know what is correct, however.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.88.87.242 (talk) 13:13, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I saw that, too.  I don't know WTF that was about.  I deleted it.  09:31, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Azam Tariq (religious leader)

message: We are going to have to move/rename this page for disambiguation purposes.  Another Azam Tariq has recently been named primary spokesman of the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan.--RDavi404 (talk) 15:38, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 

message: The lead section says that Azam Tariq was the head of Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, but the body says that Riaz Basra founded Lashkar-e-Jhangvi after a disagreement with Tariq (which would suggest that Tariq was never part of Lashkar-e-Jhangvi). Neither statement is cited, but the latter has more detail and therefore seems more likely to be accurate. I'm removing the statement in the lead until someone has more information. A. Parrot (talk) 23:11, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Head of Lashkar-e-Jhangvi 
Talk:St John's Regional College

message: I checked the sources on this section about the awarding of a $10 voucher, this is quite obviously incorrect. It has been a $15 voucher since August 2011. Deathlibrarian (talk) 11:55, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  $10 Voucher 
Talk:Nazareth College (Australia)

message: I have re-assessed this article per a request. This is a nice Start article well on its way to B/GA class. To improve this article needs most of its topics expanding to go into more detail. More references are also needed to make this article fully verified. It would also be good if this article had more pictures - such as that of the campus. Finally, I am giving this article low importance as I am not convinced there is enough special about this school for a higher rating. Camaron1 | Chris 16:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Simonetta Vespucci

message: I don't think she should be included in the House of Medici category; she was not married to any of them, she was only a lover of Giuliano Medici and even that can't be confirmed. – Alensha talk 10:58, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The information provided about this woman in the article is scanty, but given the lack of reliable historical sources I think it would be irresponsible for wikpedia to say more than it does.  As for the portraits, am I alone in noting that the most famous is also the most distinctive in showing personality?  The one attributed to Boticelli--and clearly the use of color and mid-range acuity strongly suggest his touch--is the only one that really looks like a portrait to me.  The others seem derivative.  If any of these paintings show the real Simonetta, it is this one. And I can certainly understand the fascination she engendered not only then, but now, more than five hundred years later. Even today she is extraordinarily beautiful.
71.205.16.37 (talk) 15:20, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar But Not the Same 

message: I don't think the lengthy discussion of identity of the woman in the Piero De Cosimo portrait (incidentally one of my favorite paintings) belongs in the opening paragraph. It is far too detailed and none of the more relevant facts about her life were detailed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.21.201.149 (talk) 04:36, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Piero De Coslmo 

message: I am removing the existing "See also" section because it's only entry is written about and linked elsewhere in the article.  This removal is in accord with my understanding of Wikipedia's Manual of Style guidelines.  Section 3.3 of the article Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout contains the following passage:  "As a general rule the "See also" section should not repeat links which appear in the article's body or its navigation boxes. Thus, many high-quality, comprehensive articles do not have a "See also" section."Ctconnolly (talk) 15:06, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also
Talk:Cultural attaché

message: Last Edit (07:58, 25 August 2014)- Removed due to lack of significance.  To date, this article doesn't mention a SINGLE example of a cultural attache.  Fictional or otherwise, the Birdcage fills that role.  While I agree there should be more examples, I think that ANY actuals are better than none.  For what it's worth jbmurray, to quote you, "I try to edit in line with the Bold, Revert, Discuss cycle. And in response to other people's edits, I hold dear the maxim that "when someone makes an edit you consider biased or inaccurate, improve the edit if you can, rather than reverting it." A good faith edit, even when it itself is wrong, almost always indicates a problem with the original text, which should therefore be improved somehow."  Something to think about. :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.194.115.33 (talk)  
Another example was in Season 1 of the Blacklist (can't recall the episode).  *shrugs*  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrobviousjosh (talk • contribs) 19:02, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

message: I think we should list what a cultural attaché means depending on each country, since their responsibilities differ depending on the country. Abu Yagub (talk) 03:43, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  add section for purpose per country
Talk:Siôn Cent

message: The article currently refers to "John a Kent, a raider of the Welsh Marches in 1482/3, whose mischievous exploits were recorded by Anthony Munday in the late 16th century in Munday's 'John A Kent and John A Cumber'". But Munday's John a-Kent is a wizard, not a border raider, and appears to live in the early thirteenth century (although the fourteenth century outlaw Gosselin d' Eyville appears in the play as well). The fact is that the fictional composite figure John or Jack a-Kent had already entered the popular consciousness by Munday's time, and his play is not based on any one historical figure but rather on a legend which probably owed a lot to Sion Cent and others.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.68.16 (talk) 21:16, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: John A Kent
Talk:William Parr (died 1483)

message: Perhaps we should think about re-naming this page as Sir William was never titled 1st Baron Parr of Kendal. That title was bestowed upon his grandson, William Parr, 1st Marquess of Northampton in 1538. This William Parr is usually known as Sir William Parr of Kendal KG as he was one of only two gentlemen made Knight of the Garter in the late reign of Edward IV. What do people think about this? He did receive 1/4 of the barony but technically was not suo jure baron. -- Lady Meg (talk) 01:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are absolutely correct, ; and as you have had no reply for nearly six years, I have gone ahead with the move. Reliable sources agree with you; it probably stems from misunderstanding the grant of a portion of the fee of a barony, as being a grant of a barony itself. Still got to change the transcluded ancestors chart, and the image in the info box to reflect his newly-acquired status. Cheers, O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 12:54, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of Page 

message: Noticed the user HistoryAmma spammed the article. Anyone feel like correcting it? Not even sure the statements are factual. It’s been awhile since I checked the page. Can’t just revert edit unfortunately. Lady Meg (talk) 10:59, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits by User
Talk:Démarche

message: There is a confusion in this article between a piece of formal correspondence and a diplomatic tactic or manoevre.  The meaning of the word "demarche", in Miriam Webster, substantiates these two meanings as: 
: "1. (a): a course of action (b): a diplomatic or political initiative or maneuver  
:  2. : a petition or protest presented through diplomatic channels"
The article seems to be based upon an attempt to unify these two distinct uses via the etymology of the word, which comes from the French verb for:  "to march".   
I have taken the liberty of editing the opening paragraph to clarify this.
As there is no ownership here of the tag placed on the article, and therefore now way of knowing if the issue is resolved to the tagger's or Wikipedia's satisfaction, I would like to take ownership of it as the article, through the overwhelming detailed reference  to US procedures clearly does not reflect the use of demarches in other countries.  There is also no discussion of its place in diplomatic procedures or examples of its use in a series of diplomatic moves.
LookingGlass (talk) 12:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error and bias 

message: Is "diplomatic note" a synonym for "démarche"? Squideshi (talk) 19:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diplomatic Note 

message: I know it's easy to complain about and hard to solve problems. But I just want to add input that this whole article has serious problems:
* It's unsourced - no citations
* It reads like it has been copied from someplace else, probably a US gov't document.
* It doesn't include information on a world-wide viewpoint.
I don't really know how to fix it (I was coming to this page to learn about the subject) but I thought I'd at least contribute some input on directions that would help at least this reader. Stevemidgley (talk) 05:55, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article reads like a US state dept training manual 

message: What is one of those then?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.184.176 (talk) 08:47, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Front channel cable? 
Talk:Loreto Mandeville Hall

message: Well done 58.160.120.112 and others. What is missing is more refs (for a B) and some pictures (for interest). The house system is improving. Do log in. Victuallers 09:57, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess
Talk:Barbara Christian

message: I am glad that you want to improve the article, but please note analysis of her work cannot be based on material created by her. I have no ownership issues over content; however, as I noted on your talk page, you are not allowed to use Christian as a source for a discussion of her work. Editors must use secondary sources which analyze her contributions or it will be construed as original research, which is outside of WP policy. Your content may well be reverted if you do not use secondary sources. (I will not revert it again, as I am opposed to edit warring). There are numerous reviews of her work out there which can be used, like  or . If you need help, I'll be glad to try. SusunW (talk) 23:27, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: , learning to navigate WP is a huge deal. LOL It can be in the main body or a separate section, as it is a critical part of her legacy, but any discussion of the work must be from sources other than her. It's kind of the complete reverse of academia, where one analyzes the original work. On WP, one must use someone else's analysis of the work and paraphrase their ideas. All the citations you have given are to "The Race for Theory" itself, thus, since it isn't quoted directly, WP calls it original research. You can quote from her, using "The Race for Theory" as a source, but you cannot make any analysis. So for example "Christian tied this phenomenon directly to a rise in critics being trained solely as academics, without any experience as creative writers," is original research. If a secondary source says she did that, it can remain, or you can quote... Christian noted that in previous eras "the critic was usually also a writer of poetry, plays, or novels. But today, as a new generation of professionals develops, he or she is increasingly an academic." I'm not sure if I am explaining this well, but the gist is that *you* cannot analyze what she said, you must paraphrase what someone else has written about the work. SusunW (talk) 00:17, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Race for Theory
Talk:Barbara Valentin

message: How did she die in 2002?
::"Brain hemorrhage" the coroner said. Which leaves some space for speculations as she not only sold cocaine to other people (like Freddie Mercury) on a regular basis. This was stated in the documentary "We are the Champions" about Queen.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.96.241.232 (talk) 16:52, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of death? 

message: Here's more info I did copy from differents websites: 
Barbara Valentin (December 15, 1940 – February 22, 2002) was an Austrian actress.  
Born Ursula Ledersteger in Vienna, Austria to art director Hans Ledersteger and actress Irmgard Alberti. Valentin was dubbed the German Jayne Mansfield during her acting career. She worked in film, often with Rainer Werner Fassbinder.
Valentin was married twice, to writer Helmut Dietl (1976–1983) and to actor John Ashton (1983–1986).
During the 1980s, she was romantically involved with Freddie Mercury, appearing in Queen's videoclip "It's a Hard Life" (1984), they remained friends and she supported the fight of HIV organizations against the disease after his death. She became Icon of the Munich gay scene.
On February 22, 2002, Valentin died of a stroke in Munich. She is buried in Ostfriedhof cemetery in Munich.
80.32.117.89 (talk) 12:56, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Info
Talk:Diplomatic credentials

message: I added official government websites as references to this page. Would you consider those to be in accordance with the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy? It doesn't provide guidelines for a situation like this. --Maxj333 (talk) 01:58, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the second paragraph should the word "whose" be removed or should it be some other word?
184.60.38.116 (talk) 00:46, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Word error?
Talk:Diplomatic service

message: This should be entitled "Foreign Service", to make clear that it is the elite service composed of the best and the brightest - those few individuals who passed the Oral Exam and are entrusted with carrying out the foreign policy of our National Leaders. To suggest that it is part of the civil service is an affront to the professional FSOs serving on the front lines.
FS2, Political Officer  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.252.4.21 (talk) 04:03, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Basilea Schlink

message: A published obituary on her is here.  In the British press, so more reliable than a U.S. obit would be.  This seems to (often via copyright violation) be the source of much of the English language coverage of her.  She seems to be the subject of chapter 7 of this book.  GRBerry 23:39, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Bebu Silvetti

message: What's the source for this? The album was produced by Rafael Trabucchelli, which was one of the most renowned producers working in Spain for the Hispavox label. As far as I know, Trabucchelli never worked as record producer outside Spain. Alvabass (talk) 03:30, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Spring Rain" produced in México?
Talk:John Clanvowe

message: There is an issue with the naming of Sir Clanvowe. Some sites state he was Sir John Clanvowe, with only Britannica calling him Thomas Clanvowe. Could someone who knows about this subject please clear this up.--FruitMonkey 10:13, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am planning on making some changes and additions to this Wikipedia page to provide some more information on Sir John Clanvowe, and give a wider range of more recent sources discussing the knight.
Firstly, I plan to add some additional details of Clanvowe's political career, and his roles and responsibilities serving as a chamber knight for Richard II. I will mainly use Scattergood, V.J. (1975). The Works of Sir John Clanvowe. Rowman and Littlefield, and McFarlane, K.B. (1972). Lancastrian Kings and Lollard Knights. Clarendon Press to provide most of this information. This will also include details of his military career in France and on crusade. I also feel Clanvowe's religion is an important and interesting topic which deserves more discussion, being one the seven Lollard knights mentioned by Thomas Walsingham. His work The Two Ways gives a good insight into his religious beliefs, and is a fascinating account of unorthodox religious views in the late Fourteenth Century. K.B McFarlane and Hudson discuss this source in length, with the latter's book called (1988). The Premature Reformation: Wycliffite Texts and Lollard History. Oxford University Press and will be used for its analysis. This should hopefully provide some good historiography on the Welsh/English knight, and also give him a more detailed representation on Wikipedia.--Sean1188 (talk) 08:44, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates
Talk:Internally displaced persons in the United States

message: Where are these numbers from can some one either cite them or delete them  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.123.106.132 (talk) 17:39, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citing 

message: I don't understand why this notice has been posted "This article or section may have been copied and pasted from another location, possibly in violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please review the source and remedy this by editing this article to remove any non-free copyrighted content and attributing free content correctly, or flagging the content for deletion. Please be sure that the supposed source of the copyright violation is not itself a Wikipedia mirror. (August 2018)" How does one fix the problem? IamIDP (talk) 17:23, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: IamIDP, if you have not already done so, please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. This is an important policy that must be rigorously adhered to. Once you understand it, you should compare each sentence in this article to its corresponding source. If you find verbatim passages, please replace them by summarizing the source material in your own words, or paraphrasing within the limits explained here. KalHolmann (talk) 17:54, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding Wiki notice: Copyright-problem This article or section may have been copied and pasted from another location, possibly in violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. 

message: Those displaced from New Orleans seem to be the only example of internally displace people, and the content therefore overlaps entirely with New Orleans diaspora. Given that Internally displaced persons in the United States is the broader topic, I suggest merging both here. Klbrain (talk) 20:21, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 20:49, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Thomas Langley

message: The process by which Langley became bishop of Durham was quite complex.
By 1403 he was keeper of the privy seal and dean of York - the highest ecclesiastic appointment apart from the bishops - and as such, he was clearly in line for a bishopric.
In the later middle ages there were 4 stages in appointing a bishop:-
Proposal by the king
Election by the dean and chapter (or abbot and monks) of the cathedral
Confirmation by the pope in a papal Bull
Admission by the relevant archbishop
The pope could ignore the kings choice and appoint someone else, but the requirement to be admitted by the Archbishop remained
The king proposed Langley first as bishop of London when Robert Baybrooke died in August 1404.
He was opposed by the archbishop of Canterbury (Thomas Arundel) who supported Robert Hallum, chancellor of Oxford University - though Arundel later changed his support to Langley.
However the pope (Innocent VII) nominated Roger Walden - Richard II's archbishop of Canterbury appointed when Arundel was exiled. Arundel refused to admit him and the see effectively remained vacant.
After archbishop Scrope was executed in June 1405 Langley was elected as archbishop by the chapter of York minster - he was of course the dean. Once again the pope provided someone else - Robert Hallum, by now archdeacon of Canterbury, and once again Arundel refused to admit him.
However, in March 1406 another vacancy arose when Walter Skirlaw, bishop of Durham died. This time everything went smoothly. 
King Henry IV granted the licence to elect a bishop on April 25th and the bull of provision was issued by the pope on May 13th. 
On May 17th Langley was elected by the monks (under pressure from the king) by 47 votes out of 56. Thewiltog (talk) 15:24, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Langley's provision the the see of Durham
Talk:Benjamin DeMott

message: Titles now have apostrophes in places like that too? Or is that a typo? I mean, it should be Why Americans... That's still an error, last I checked, but I don't know if it's Demott's, his publisher's, or a Wikipedia editor's. Schissel | Sound the Note! 01:04, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Trouble with Friendship: Why American's Can't Think Straight about Race
Talk:Thomas Neville (died 1471)

message: I just found an amusing quote:
On May 14, Fauconberg assaulted London at Bishopsgate, Aldgate and London Bridge with "shot guns and arrows and fire". 
 vs.  on 100px|London Bridge
I would have liked to see that battle!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by BackToThePast (talk • contribs) 17:04, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As these two articles are about THE SAME PERSON then of course they should be merged.
Plucas58 (talk) 21:23, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merger of [[Thomas Neville]] and [[Thomas Fauconberg]], the Bastard of Fauconberg

message: I have been bold and done the merge.
HOWEVER: just found out that loads of it seems to come (almost word for word) from this site here:
http://www.luminarium.org/encyclopedia/thomasthebastard.htm
The article needs serious sourcing too. Basket Feudalist  17:57, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: NOW MERGED
Talk:Villa of the Mysteries

message: Near the end of the article it says "There are many different translations of the frescoes (---)". What does translations mean here - interpretations? colour reproductions? Strausszek (talk) 16:02, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Translations"? 

message: It's been brought to my attention that British/European spellings and conventions might be more appropriate for this page. My impulse is to stick with the spellings that have been standard from the beginning, but I'm open to change if others think it is appropriate. Would anyone like to voice an opinion? Kafka Liz (talk) 21:55, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to modify spellings 

message: I'd add 2-3 sentences to lead to make it a good size. Cas Liber (talk · contribs)
:Done Johnbod (talk) 16:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead 

message: — Assignment last updated by Atlas2016 (talk) 19:56, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Roman Women

message: What is Fresco the villa of mysteries 210.1.130.102 (talk) 08:50, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music and arts
Talk:Joan Hall

message: I'm inclined to agree with the anon editor. If something is not carried in mainstream news sources but is carried by pollbludger, I think we need to tread very cautiously. In this case, pollbludger himself is only speculating, writing "Those who read between the lines could surmise that he (Joan's husband Steele Hall) blamed the episode on the federal member for Sturt, Christopher Pyne, a powerful moderate."  We should directly qualify it  (as in changing "was seen as machinations" to "was seen by pollbludger as machinations") or delete it. Peter Ballard 02:03, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of pollbludger