Talk:Pierre Teilhard de Chardin/Archive 1

message: "I try not to waste too much of my time dealing with extremely bigoted and obtuse fanatics of any persuasion, but occasionally there excesses will prompt me to some action, even if it is only to comment."
Psychological projection?-PV  
"Archaic and little known but valid definition: 
cosmotheism = pantheism. ACCEPTED."
That has already been factually cited as being true.-PV
 
Absurd and appallingly ill illogic: 
cosmotheism + bigoted, "racialist", solipsistic nonsense = Cosmotheism, AND THUS cosmotheism = Cosmotheism, and THUS  EQUALS the ultimate representative of all "True" pantheists, and is THUS justified in appropriating all manner of dignified and well heralded names of any philosopher or thinker past, present or future to its "Holy" cause. 
"Absurd and appallingly ill illogic:", I could not agree more! LOL! :D
That is really only MOBY's own "absurd and appallingly ill illogic", 
and not mine nor any true Cosmotheists' own reasoning. 
"Strawman arguement", MOBY.-PV
That it is plainly not the dominant view of all "right-thinking" individuals is only because of nefarious "ZOG" conspiracies, and the like.
LOL! :D
There is always some TRUTH in such HUMOR! :D-PV
I AM ENLIGHTENED! My Holy Universe! How could I not see it before! PV has the ultimate POV of GOD! ALL HAIL his stupendous genius! — since I am not deranged I do not ever say such things save with wearied mockery. 
Indeed.
What could be more ENLIGHTENING than actually realizing that 
"GOD is the impersonal COSMOS and the COSMOS is a impersonal GOD"?-PV
Some people seem to have far more time to disrupt genuine progress in the world than to make any attempt at actually understanding it. 
LOL! :D
No arguement there!-PV
The catalog of great thinkers who were NOT "Cosmotheists" in the particular sense is an interesting and yet invalid appeal to claiming that everyone who doesn't embrace "Cosmotheism" is an incompetent moron, and the dupe of "Zionist" conspiracies. 
"Absurd and appallingly ill illogic:", yet again! LOL! :D
But, many that can't actually understand Cosmotheism are incompetent morons, and many that wouldn't embrace it, even if they weren't morons, are only either lacking in factual knowledge, personal integrity, intellectual honesty, or moral courage, and no more and no less.
What else isn't new?-PV
Even with the wide range of nonsense that exists in the world, I don't think too many people are going to get hooked on PV's particular form of it. Thank the  KOSMOS!
I do completely agree!
True Cosmotheism only banishes the "drug" of those "hooked on SSEE delusions" of only those that have the real strength of character, or the actual personal integrity to uphold it.-PV 
By the way PV, I'm not "David Gerard's" "sock-puppet", and to my remembrance I have not as yet had any form of dialog with him anywhere. 
Sure, David Gerard, sure.
You may as well as be, if not in fact.
-PV
As in many other things you seem to be a bit overconfident in your assessments of what is likely, what is real, what is true, and what is rational.
Hardly. 
I do trust my own judgements.
More often than not I am correct.-PV
I assert that despite my irritation at your obstinacy, and your being an insulter of most people's intelligence, and an accuser of anyone who disagrees with you of being pathologically narcissistic (try and see beyond yourself and actually think about that diagnosis a bit), in your being a nuisance to a lot of other people, I have no ill-will towards you, and truly hope you someday come to know the true joy of really understanding that not everyone in the world who is inclined to disagree with you on anything is a total idiot.  ~ Moby  22:45, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: A response by Moby, David Gerard's [[Sock puppet]]?

message: I had never heard of cosmotheism until I read this page.  I was shocked to see Pierre Teilhard de Chardin linked to white separatists and decided to investigate further.  There is not a single link that I could find when I googled +"Pierre Teilhard de Chardin" cosmotheist that referred to Teilhard being cosmotheist.  It seems that the Church founded by Pierce seems to have hijacked that name.  I can't see any added value in referring to Teilhard de Chardin as a cosmotheist than is already there when he is referred to as a pantheist.  I will await comments but I propose removing the reference to cosmotheist in the article as it does not add any value and creates enormous confusion and controversy.
--Peacenik 19:57, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Cosmotheism