Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Indian districts

message: Please read. Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 08:00, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Workgroup-level quality statistics 

message: Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory.  This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.  B2T2 15:16, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project directory 

message: Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 20:35, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Day Awards 

message: What's the outcome of the discussions on the naming convention for districts in India?--mānu 06:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming convention for districts 

message: I just renamed Kodagu district to Kodagu, because it seemed to be pointless, and I could see no agreement here on the 'district' suffix in such cases. Better to ask it anyway. Has it been agreed that every district shall have 'district' appended to its name, even if the name is independent of any town? If so, where and why? 
Examples at  North 24 Parganas district (long name made even longer), Dakshina Kannada (no district), Kanpur Dehat district (somewhat tautological?), Gautam Buddha Nagar district (long name, and it's Budh on the official website). Imc 20:22, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to agree with you but I suggest not to move any more articles to their name without "District" until consensus forms. I'm almost certain someone will object, so we should discuss this properly, reflect on each other's opinions and only proceed from there. We don't want to have a silly revert war, which may happen if someone feels strongly about this. GizzaDiscuss © 08:35, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary use  of 'district' where there is no ambiguity 

message: This may be of interest - I hope someone here can weigh in on the issue at hand. TIA. --Gurubrahma (talk) 06:25, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New name for a district 

message: TinucherianBot can automatically tag articles with  Banner as  to the talk page of articles without the project banner. It can also add the workgroup paramaters like "|kerala=yes|kerala-importance=" etc ,if needed. The currently supported workgroups are  Kerala,  Maharashtra,  Andhra pradesh, Tamil Nadu,  Gujarat, Bengal, Goa, Himachal Pradesh , Karnataka , Punjab,cities,  Cinema, Literature, Protected Areas of India, History, Politics, states, Geography,Maps,Districts and Tamil. 
If you need so, you need to provide me with the Categories to run the Bot. Due to some technical issues, the Bot will not run recursively to sub-categories. The requester should kindly verify that  there are NO non-related articles in the category. 
You may request for the bot run on my talk page... Thanks --   TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)      - 06:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Tagging with [[User:TinucherianBot|TinucherianBot]]

message: To help this workgroup patrol existing articles for vandalism/recent changes, Ganeshbot has created the Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian districts/Articles page. This page will be updated on a regular basis. Please do remind me if I forget. :) It contains articles that were tagged with the India banner and fall under the scope of this workgroup. Please let me know in case of any questions. Thanks, Ganeshk (talk) 11:34, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Watchlists

message: User:WolterBot has created a Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian districts/Cleanup listing page; it contains the articles that fall under the scope this workgroup and have cleanup tags on them. See this page for more information on this works. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Ganeshk (talk) 04:03, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup listings

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:43, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

message: Hi Guys, I've been seeing a lot of 404 links to census data. This is an attempt to centralise the reference links. 
If you visit User:ChiragPatnaik/Census/Data by district, you'll find links to Districtwise data sheets. ChiragPatnaik (talk) 20:50, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to Census Data by district 

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:16, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Indian districts 

message: The articles like "Districts of X" (where X is a state/UT of India): shouldn't they be like list-type (compare: List of counties in Arizona, which is an FL)? In that case, should we move "Districts of X" to "List of districts of X" or similar? Thanks.--GDibyendu (talk) 17:23, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basic question 

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:26, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: Okip   00:47, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced living people articles bot

message: Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone.  Articles were selected based on their assessed  importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Indian districts articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details.  You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010.  As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide.  Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback! 
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:09, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indian districts articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release 

message: I have created together with Smallman12q a toolserver tool that shows a weekly-updated list of cleanup categories for WikiProjects, that can be used as a replacement for WolterBot and this WikiProject is among those that are already included (because it is a member of :Category:WolterBot cleanup listing subscriptions). See the tool's wiki page, this project's listing in one big table or by categories and the index of WikiProjects. Svick (talk) 21:20, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject cleanup listing 

message: The far majority of Indian District articles are not rated for importance. I think we should do it by population, as that way we can avoid debates; it's the most democratic way of listing them. 
This is my plan:
Top: Lists of districts by state, and districts with 4 million + pop.
High: Districts with 2 to 4 million pop.
Mid: Districts with 1 to 2 million pop.
Low: Districts with less than 1 million pop.
I'm going to start now. Does this sound fair? If you want to tweak it, discuss it here. Thanks.
NOTE: We have a different importance scale than the rest of the India project of which we're a part. To specifically change our importance level, but not that of the India project (most of the districts are low importance on that scale), type: |districts-importance=high etc. TY.
PhnomPencil (talk) 11:34, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating Importance 

message: Template:Infobox District IN and :Category:Indian districts templates (note: not :Category:India district templates) have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DH85868993 (talk) 05:07, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion|Nomination for deletion]] of [[Template:Infobox District IN]] and [[:Category:Indian districts templates]] 

message: Is there any template for District Tehsil Infobox for Mandal/tehsil pages?--Vin09 (talk) 04:45, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  District tehsils infobox 

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: There is a nice but incomplete stub here contribute in editing it.
Riswa   talk  06:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete Stub 

message: Sonipat Junction
:The author is blocked.Xx236 (talk) 09:44, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Sonipat Panipat? 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: I don't know the level of action here but I made comments at Talk:Sri Ganganagar district#Sri, Shri, or both. Interested parties please weigh in.  Otr500 (talk) 19:18, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency 

message: Please see Talk:List of districts of Tamil Nadu#Map in infobox needs updating. Thanks! ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 00:55, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of districts of Tamil Nadu 

message: These two sections are missing from the guidelines for creating the articles. Where should one include these? Srihari Thalla (talk) 11:53, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @ IMO tourism could be placed after culture and notable people should be placed above references at the end. Also I think demographics should be placed after geography and before economy.--Ankit (Talk with me) 19:37, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @Ankit2299, @SrihariThalla I agree with placing  tourism after culture, demographics after geography and notable people as the last section before References. Economy is better after administrative and politics section, as  it may refer to the administrative divisions in its content. Arjunaraoc (talk) 10:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections for "Tourism" and "Notable people" 

message: :::::New Page Patrol needs experienced volunteers
::::* New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles, including Indian districts related articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
::::* Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference. 
::::* If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions and review our instructions page. You can apply for the user-right HERE. --John B123 (talk) 13:53, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Page Patrol 

message: Lot of improvements are needed on Andhra Pradesh district  articles, following the districts reorganisation in 2022.  Please see page  for the initiative and participate. Thanks in advance. Arjunaraoc (talk) 22:39, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvement of Andhra Pradesh district articles