lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jerry A. Taylor

message: There was a Jerry Taylor page way back when, and it was deleted not per BLP but Notability. This one should also go.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mateo LeFou (talk • contribs) 18:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion

message: Articles about living people notable only for one event:
:(quote)  Wikipedia is not a newspaper. The bare fact that someone has been in the news does not in itself imply that they should be the subject of an encyclopedia entry. Where a person is mentioned by name in a Wikipedia article about a larger subject, but remains of essentially low profile themselves, we should generally avoid having an article on them. If reliable sources only cover the person in the context of a particular event, then a separate biography is unlikely to be warranted. Marginal biographies on people with no independent notability can give undue weight to the events in the context of the individual, create redundancy and additional maintenance overhead, and cause problems for our neutral point of view policy. In such cases, a redirect or merge are usually the better options. Cover the event, not the person.
My take is that this article is an attempt to embarrass or demean the subject, not necessarily to provide information. The news event is covered sufficiently on the Tuttle, Oklahoma page. Group29 21:48, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  per [[WP:BLP1E]]
Talk:Old Delhi

message: Old Delhi redirects to Delhi, which refers to a larger entity, namely the metropolitan area of Delhi.  It appears that there is no article on the old city, the closest "relative" being History of Delhi.  If anything, perhaps Old Delhi should redirect to Shahjahanabad. --Ishu 17:12, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I decided to be bold.  --Ishu 19:38, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:(613100) 2005 TN74

message: I'm not finding this object referenced at the cfa-www.harvard.edu site. Is it re-classified agian or found not to actually exist?Sethhater123 17:14, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is back. MPC seems to have experienced regrettable problems with the web server (google’able). The real source (i.e. MPCORB database I've just re-dowloaded to update the Centaurs' graphs, gives the type as 0F i.e. other resonant TNO. Eurocommuter 22:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:D.C. Statehood Green Party

message: The claim that the SGP is the second most popular party in DC seems to be based on the fact that in 2006 all SGP candidates combined got more votes than all Republican candidates combined, but the SGP was running more candidates, so the statistic is misleading. In registration, the SGP has less than a sixth of the voters the Republicans do. KCinDC (talk) 16:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've revised the first paragraph to clarify where the claim comes from. KCinDC (talk) 14:19, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Second most popular party?

message: Washington, D.C. is a city, not a state. Also, it can't exactly be a D.C. Statehood party if D.C. is already a state... ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:36, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The District of Columbia isn't a state. It's a terroeitory with one city - Washington, D.C.. Since they're coterminus, they have one government. Me-123567-Me (talk) 16:56, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The party itself and its national organization consider it a state-affiliate. For the purposes of this article, that should be sufficient for including it in the GPUS by state category.--TM 22:21, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: That is not how a state is formed. The Green Party is not authorized under the Constitution to admit a new state to the Union. Jack N. Stock (talk) 02:08, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

text: And if the Green Party considered it a part of Argentina, would you recategorize it as an Argentine political party? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:31, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  ...by state categories
Talk:Portimão

message: I think this needs a lot of editing... especially with paragraphs, and needs original text etc., as this seems to be copied from elsewhere, along with changing the strange present tense at the end of the article to an appropriate tense. As I don't know much about Portimão, would anyone like to help out with this? Dannpm 00:52, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text 

message: I am seriously concerned that this page has had a copyright violation since revision no.39639259 (see the [ diff]). I found the exact text at 
http://www.sellandbuydirect.com/infoalgarve/historyofportimao.html which, according to  is a real estate website selling Portuguese property. I am unsure whether they copied the text from Wikipedia or whether the anon copied the text to here from there, but I am reverting nonetheless and will add as much text as I can translate as a pt-0/pt-1 user from the Portugues article. --Iamunknown 22:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright infringement, I am reverting 

message: the ferries mentioned in the article no longer run see http://www.algarveresident.com/0-45452/algarve/ferry-company-stops-portimao-madeira-service
"The ferry link between Portimão and Madeira by the ship Volcan de Tijarafe has been scrapped by Spanish operating company, Naviera Armas, after three years."
the algarve resident is one of the more largely circulated english language newspapers in the algarve. it is mostly a newspaper for british expats. it is a reputable source.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.237.180.162 (talk) 10:02, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  transport 
Talk:Tavira

message: I attempted to add eight categories here based on the city's repeated destruction and establishment. As the article states, "Tavira's origins date back to the late Bronze Age (1.000-800 BC). .... Phoenician Tavira existed until the end of 6th Century BC, when it was destroyed by conflict. ... After a century of being abandoned, the settlement recovered, ... This second urban center, Tartessian Tavira, was also abandoned by the end of the 4th Century BC...." etc. I think this justifies inclusion in the 2nd-millennium BC establishments (for the Bronze Age), the 6th-century BC destruction, the 5th-century BC re-establishment, and the 4th-century BC destruction. However that just may be referring to the town center (and not the entire town) so it may be overcategorization. Since there is a city there today, it obviously wasn't completely destroyed in the 4th-century BC (or was re-created again sometime later). -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:06, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Establishments/disestablishment categories 
Talk:Trofa

message: Im from Trofa and I was quite surprised to see there was an article about Trofa. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kalupses (talk • contribs) 14:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi from Trofa 
Talk:Bishop of Truro

message: The article claims that Henry Philpotts divided the Diocese in 1877, however he seems to have died in 1869. DuncanHill 17:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Division from Diocese of Exeter

message: Fry an Spyrys (Free the Spirit) is a group based in Cornwall, UK who are campaigning for the disestablishment of the Church of England in Cornwall. It claims that there is a growing threat of merger between the Truro and Exeter dioceses and is campaigning against what it describes as the "remorseless drive towards greater centralisation in the Church resulting in less and less local accountability, authority and focus."
Is this paragraph directly relevant to an article on the Bishop of Truro?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dodgerjammy (talk • contribs) 13:31, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free the Spirit
File talk:Smuldowney.jpg

message: 12-14-06 There's been a dispute about the fair usage of the image: I believe it's essential to use this image because it illustrates 1) Suzanne Muldowney's identity and 2) her completely unique and trademark handmade Underdog costume. I have the identity of the person who took the original photo, I'm currently tracking them down for official permission. Ladyofspain 17:38, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you change the license to reflect the terms it was released under? —Chowbok ☠ 01:19, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Bertha Mahony

message: The biography linked in the External link section that I created gives her name as Bertha Mahoney Miller (due to her marriage to William Davis Miller in 1932).  The biography is written by her own book company.  Would it be more appropriate to move this article to Bertha Mahoney Miller rather than Bertha Mahoney?  The move would result in a redirect for anyone searching for Bertha Mahoney so that they would still be sent directly to this article as well.  ju66l3r 17:23, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Talk:Faves.com

message: <Excerpt of comment originally posted at User talk:Mckoss.>
If there is anything I can do to help you with the article, such as adding a logo and/or company infobox, please do not hesitate to ask at Talk:Blue Dot.  Again, I am sorry for your experience and hope you understand why we are sometimes so aggressive in monitoring new articles on companies. -- Satori Son 17:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did notice and appreciate your note.  We also are dealing with spammers, porn spammers, etc., so I empathise completely.  Your offer is very generous.  I've archived the original article at User:mckoss/Blue_Dot_Inc.   Feel free to grab the logo and infobox from the archived article.  I think it best that I refrain from edits on my own at this point, and to let the article evolve naturally. Mike Koss 17:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New article after speedy deletion 
Talk:Valongo

message: I began translating the Portuguese article, which has a more robust content. This article is both within the scope of WikiProject Portugal and the European 10.000 Challenge
Feel free to help, but please provide proper credit!
Copyrights statement: Content in this edit is translated from the existing Wikipedia article at :pt:Valongo; see its history for atribution.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noel Low (talk • contribs) 18:20, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation, validation and editing of the Portuguese article 
Talk:The Curse of Capistrano

message: While it's clear that the 1920 adaptation Mark of Zorro had a direct impact on future novelization and publication of the stories and should be mentioned, there is way too much of the article going on a tangent about the 1940 Tyrone Power remake.  All of this should be moved into the 1920 Mark of Zorro film article; it really doesn't belong here. Nor really does the Batman connection, as that's based on the film, not the serialized stories. Deliusfan (talk) 06:16, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie and original story conflating within article
Talk:Viana do Castelo

message: Para os editores em Português! Esta página está cheia de erros! E não me deixam corrigir?
:Correct article: http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viana_do_Castelo
This is the English version of Wikipedia. You can correct and comment in English and go to the Portuguese version of this article for corrections and comments in Portuguese.
ICE77 (talk) 04:02, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong article 

message: * The "Heart of Viana", inspired by traditional jewelry from the North of Portugal (around the city of Viana do Castelo)
* The 2016 Portugal 2 Euro Commemorative Coin depicting the  "Heart of Viana"
** More: https://ec.europa.eu/info/about-european-union/euro/euro-coins-and-notes/euro-coins/commemorative-and-collector-euro-coins_en?field_nal_country_tid_selective=22088&field_cc_issue_page_target_id_selective=All
--SvenAERTS (talk) 11:05, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request assistance to write an article on "Heart of Viana" 

message: 1. "The settlement of Viana da Foz do Lima, which it was called when King Afonso III of Portugal issued a foral (charter) on 18 July 1258, was a formalization of the 1253 Viana that the area was named."
This sentence needs revision.
2. The "Culture" section is not at all about culture.
3. "In 2010, Viana do Castelo started to implement a project of rehabilitation of the city called Viana Criativa which is based on an investigation made by Paulo Caldeira among 4 years."
The word "among" in this sentence does not make sense. I suspect it's the direct translation of the Portuguese word "durante" so it should really be "for".
4. "Once upon a time, Viana was the second center of commerce of Portugal and some investigators are now recognising that fado music was born based on the typical songs of Minho region."
Aside from the fact this sentence lacks a citation, the end of it is unclear and needs to be rewritten.
5. All images in the gallery have caption that says "Viana do Castelo, Portugal". This is ridiculous. Each should have its own description.
ICE77 (talk) 04:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments
Talk:Glyptothek

message: I suggest that this article in the future only deals with what a Glyptothek really is. And then two separate articles about the Glyptotheks of Munich and Copenhagen. 83.249.170.52 (talk) 21:53, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split article ! 
Talk:National Theatre (Munich)

message: I think the expected form in English would be "National Theatre, Munich" – with a comma. Would anyone object to our moving the page to retitle it thus? Tim riley talk 10:27, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is some inspiration: :Category:National theatres. Some titles have commas, some do not. For consistency, similar titles should be changed as well. Cote d'Azur (talk) 05:23, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Vila Real Municipality

message: I think the title Vila Real Municipality is wrong since there is no map in the world that shows this name.  It is only the official name, like "Marin County".  The district is also Vila Real so should be called Vila Real District, but the city should be called only Vila Real.Vogensen (talk) 10:38, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong category

message: Both places are the same - the city of Vila Real is not a parish/division of the municipality. However, this article has the better content so move its content to the other page Indiasummer95 (talk) 12:47, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed merger
Talk:The Fifty Year Sword

message: What's in the article now sounds more like a teaser than a plot. Can we put some Spoiler warnings on the page and then write a real plot summary? I haven't read the book so I can't do it myself, but if someone else would, it would be appreciated. Alanlastufka 23:01, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: As of May 13, 2009, the article refers to a recent interview that states Mr. Danielewski confirms of a future US reprinting of The 50 Year Sword. How recent is this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.182.179.53 (talk) 14:29, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reprint 

message: This whole article reads like advertisement for the book, and needs to be rewritten in a much more neutral tone.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Limbero (talk • contribs) 20:17, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Marshall Chess

message: I am mistaken, or did he, and his father kind of rip-off the artists. Didn't the old blues guys and Chuck Berry get only fractions of a penny per record sold?--Mikerussell 18:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royalties to artists 
Talk:2004 New York Jets season

message: Uh... should these box scores be filled in? SuperToad64 17:31, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Highway99 04:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Morris County, New Jersey

message: Why is #45 on this list?  Livingston is located in Essex County and this is a list for Morris County.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shanem201 (talk • contribs) 01:28, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entry Number 45 

message: :I received an email from Commons:User:KLOTZ who went in search of houses in the county to photograph them. He reports: 
::The Boyle-Hudspeth-Benson House in Millington, Morris House may no longer be there.  There is no 100 Basking Ridge Road.  There is 110 and a 68 and nothing between.  I talked with the owner of 100 and he told this was once a large estate and all the home in the vicinity are new.  He knows of no Benson-Hudspeth- Benson House.  There is an Estate House nearby but it is not on Basking Ridge Road.
::The David S. Bower House in Chatham I am sure is gone because the site is now occupied by a Bank right on Main Street and a strip mall next door
:Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 14:13, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos comment 

message: The photos tagged as 82 for the hibernia church are actually photos of #100, the Mt. Hope Miners church. Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.102.200.128 (talk • contribs) 20:11, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos are wrong for 82
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Grafton County, New Hampshire

message: Currently #51 on this list, "Owls Head" in Hebron, does not seem to exist. The link leads to a blank page, suggesting the target page was moved. As such, I cannot verify there is any such place. It almost seems as though this was a place mistakenly attributed to Hebron, since there is Owl's Head, the mountain, in Franconia, but on the page for Owl's Head, there's no mention of it being registered on the NRHP. The coordinates given also point to the shore of Newfound Lake, IN Hebron, but not near the address given. Suggest it be removed unless someone else can verify there is an Owls Head in Hebron, or that Owl's Head in Franconia is what is should be. ClarityNHZach (talk) 20:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I put this listing in last fall, and now I can find no evidence for why I did so. It doesn't show up in the weekly listings since 2013. It won't show up in the Focus database, because that only runs up to 2012. I'm sure we all wish the NRHP would get it together and have a single database for these things. I've removed Owls Head from the table. --Ken Gallager (talk) 12:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

text: There are at least three summits in the White Mountains named "Owls Head". Besides the one with the article in Franconia, there is one in the town of Carroll and one in the town of Benton. Having been to the ones in Franconia and Carroll, I doubt there's anything historic about them. The one in Benton overlooks the highway in Oliverian Notch, but again I would be surprised if there was any historic structure on it. --Ken Gallager (talk) 13:01, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Owls Head?
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Sullivan County, New Hampshire

message: NEW HAMPSHIRE, SULLIVAN COUNTY,
Saint-Gaudens National Historic Site Historic District,
139 Saint Gaudens Rd.,
Cornish, 13000802,
LISTED, 10/02/13
Should it be separate from the historic site itself, or incorporated into it? --‖ Ebyabe talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 22:43, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I added it to the list, since it is a separate listing. Hopefully the NPS will release the nomination form so we can figure out why it's a different listing, though; I assume there's some difference, but it's hard to say what it is just based on the name. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 02:43, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The NPS released the nomination form; it looks like it's basically a boundary extension that got submitted as a new historic district, either because of a shutdown-related clerical issue or because the first listing wasn't a historic district. Either way, the two listings refer to the same site and just describe different boundaries. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 23:07, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsure about this new listing
Talk:Suzdal

message: river Suzdar near vilage Logdus in Vologda region 176.65.96.7 (talk) 08:57, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  etimologia 

message: I'm unclear on how this article reads like a manual. Have edited to a more neutral POV. Vanessa hexagon (talk) 04:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like a manual
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Barnstable County, Massachusetts

message: #Support-I'm not sure why this was named exclusively for Barnstable, but many other counties are included, and a state-wide name is the standard according to List of National Register of Historic Places entries. I would rename it myself, but I cannot due to the target page already existing (as a redirect).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ian Burnet (talk • contribs) 02:00, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename to "List of Registered Historic Places in Massachusetts"

message: I removed the Hyannis Armory from the table. According to the NRIS database, it's status is pending and the Massachusetts Historical Commission database (MACRIS) does not indicate that it's listed on the NRHP. I'm copying the information here for reference.
|}
--sanfranman59 (talk) 04:22, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyannis Armory
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Bristol County, Massachusetts

message: Although often associated with the mills of nearby Fall River, Massachusetts, this place is located entirely in Rhode Island (Newport County).
There are two seperate listings that should be combined:
*Bourne Mill (Tiverton, Rhode Island)
*Bourne Mill
For consistency, I think it should be in Newport County, Rhode Island only.--Marcbela (talk) 13:28, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not really sure of the exact location...It is either 844 State Avenue in Tiverton or Fall River. Feel free to merge or redirect or eliminate as you see fit.  Swampyank (talk) 16:52, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bourne Mill
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Essex County, Massachusetts

message: *Scanned the links and made around 4 dab corrections. Found about 4 photos that I put on the Essex page KudzuVine (talk) 20:17, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: September 2009 Scan

message: Lynn Fells Parkway is missing from the Essex County list. --Polaron | Talk 15:27, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing
Talk:Perak F.C.

message: Should the date set to 1951 rather than the real year the football team was founded which is 1921. The "FA" was only registered in 1951 after FAM joined FIFA officially. We are talking about the football team here not the FA. It's so complicated when football team in Malaysia still outdated in term of information. They even changed the team name/logo but not changed it in the registration in FMLLP. It's became even sadder when their official website which just recently 'revived' even rip the information about the team history from Wikipedia. No research by them. sigh. JebatMalaya (talk) 19:49, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the official Perak football team founded date 

message: The official name should be reflected as Perak FA and not with its nickname. The source of the name can be found via Super League official website and sanctioned by FAM. Please reflect the change.--123.136.106.183 (talk) 07:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved this back. Such a substantial name change needs a proper RM. Fenix down (talk) 12:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  OFFICIAL NAME 