Talk:Ram Gopal Varma

message: i removed the whole RGV ki aag section here, it was written by a user who obviously had a personal agenda. critisising the work of RGV.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.142.155.83 (talk) 14:46, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: RV

message: 1. The Early years -
Section needs citations. There is a biography on IMDB, but information from RGV interviews would be better.
2. Career -
All we have is a list of films in Telugu and Hindi with a line each on a few of them. More background is needed on each film.
3. Awards -
Which awards did he win for Bhoot etc? The only win I find is the Filmfare critics award for Satya.
4. A filmography is needed - films he has written, directed and produced in Hindi and Telugu, chronologically.
Last Contrarian (talk) 22:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs a overhaul 

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 19:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Class rating

message: Is it really necessary to grade the films as hit, super hit, flop, blockbuster etc., in the filmography section. can anyone please clarify me on this. Hitmankf (talk) 07:36, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grading the film 

message: ram gepal varmas film style, and what does this style impect in bollywood film indrusty and  public reaction of that? i want to know........can anybody answer it for me....  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.15.156.68 (talk) 14:29, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This really isn't the right place to ask.  This page is not for a general discussion of Varma; rather, it's only for discussing improvements to the article.  Qwyrxian (talk) 22:34, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:   ram gepal varmas film style, and what does this style impect in bollywood film indrusty and  public reaction of that? 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:46, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Ram Gopal Varma-BJP.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Lead section too long. I can't edit to link this image. Pls link it if it is better. neo (talk) 11:19, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New image 

message: In this edit I cut a really poorly written, vague statement, "Varma is credited with revolutionizing the Indian film industry, and altering its profile." The evolution of this phrasing is interesting, because it begins here in an edit by Arichuvadi, who was determined conclusively to be a sockpuppet of Padmalakshmisx. Per WP:REVERTBAN, 
Since I don't have to assume good faith of a de facto banned sock operator, I can assume instead that it was an attempt to inflate the importance of the subject by saying broadly that "Varma is credited with revolutionizing the Indian film industry"--in the lead, no less. In fact, the original reference, (which itself is dubious as a reliable source) makes it clear that it's an exaggerated statement that speaks specifically of his use of cheap small cameras, his "flow-cam" system, which result in a reduced size of production units. By no stretch of the imagination is there any claim that Varma is widely considered to have revolutionized the entire Indian film industry, which is what the wording strongly comes across as saying. The other aspect of "revolution" in the article simply refers to Varma using a different system of distribution. There again is no evidence that any actual "revolution" has taken place, or that he is widely considered to have revolutionized anything. The other reference that follows the most recent iteration of this claim, this doesn't say anything about revolutionizing anything and seems to relate to the receipt of six Nandi awards.
So, the options as I see them:
# Cut the sentence, which I did. 
# Restore elements of the "flow-cam" content somewhere other than the lead, and written in such a way that (gasp!) it's consistent with WP:NPOV. However, since I'm still questioning AmericanBazaarOnline, any attention to flow-cam needs to come from established reliable sources, until we establish the site as a reliable source. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:41, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarifying misleading content 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Ram Gopal Varma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111003002930/http://www.telugucinema.com/c/publish/movieretrospect/gaayam_retro0909_printer.php to http://www.telugucinema.com/c/publish/movieretrospect/gaayam_retro0909_printer.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090725153007/http://www.cinemastrikesback.com/?p=1202 to http://www.cinemastrikesback.com/?p=1202
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090302235319/http://www.indiawest.com/readmore.aspx?id=860&sid=5 to http://www.indiawest.com/readmore.aspx?id=860&sid=5
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130306133838/http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/bollywood/Advani-praises-RGV-s-The-Attacks-of-26-11-advocates-Parliament-screening/Article1-1018841.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Bollywood/Advani-praises-RGV-s-The-Attacks-of-26-11-advocates-Parliament-screening/Article1-1018841.aspx
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://s1056.photobucket.com/user/PavanJandhyala/library/Siva?sort=3&page=1
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120708042017/http://filmfareawards.indiatimes.com/articleshow/articleshow/articleshow/368679.cms to http://filmfareawards.indiatimes.com/articleshow/articleshow/articleshow/368679.cms
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717100215/http://www.cinemastrikesback.com/index.php?p=562 to http://www.cinemastrikesback.com/index.php?p=562
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:42, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There appears to be a dispute regarding Ram's occupation. His official occupation is director and producer. Calling him the "craziest porn director of India" is not an occupation, but a personal opinion. This violated Wikipedia WP:NPOV policy. Furthermore, there is no mention of porn in the article except for one source that's only listed in references that discusses his autobiography. I do not believe this quote should be stated in his bio. As well, just because he released one porn video doesn't make him "craziest porn director of India", as well it is still not his occupation. He has directed many things besides porn. He produced the porn video, he is a producer. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Occupation