lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nuclear power/Archive 7

message: Ultramarine 06:50, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting report 

message: This section was added. It seems pretty important - and I'd like to be sure its accurate to the best of our knowledge. Benjamin Gatti
:One major obstacle for expanded Nuclear energy is the limitation of available Uranium, without which it becomes necessary to build and operate breeder reactors to produce suitable fuel rods from alternative sources including spent fuel. Breeder reactors however, have been banned in the US since President Carter - the only Nuclear engineer to serve as President - prohibited reprocessing because of the unacceptable risk of proliferation of weapon grade materials. Thus, there is but a limited supply of safe nuclear fuel before it becomes necessary to re-introduce the breeder reactor, which will increase the liklyhood to an unacceptable degree that weapons grade materials will be available to terrorists and rogue leaders.
::I'm not an expert in the field, but here's my understanding. Uranium 235 is produced normally by refining naturally occuring uranium in an energy intensive process. You can get weapons grade materials without needing a breeder reactor. However, plutonium is made by irradiating uranium 238 in a breeder reactor (and refining the subsequent material). This can be used as a fuel in reactors. But that's not so hard to do (well, ignoring the issue of radiation and criticality). The US's first reactor to produce power, EBR-1 didn't require that much in the way of materials (aside from the uranium), but it needed a knowledgeable staff to build and run the place.
::I think a group with the substantial resources that Al Qaeda had in the 90's, could build such a place, though acquiring Russian material was probably far cheaper and didn't require building a bombable target. -- KarlHallowell 18:37, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The section on "Life cycle" describes uranium processing in detail and contradicts the original claims of the above section. However, the above section has since been rewritten in a way which removes my objections. -- KarlHallowell 23:16, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proliferation Horizon 

message: Special thanks to admin Woohookitty for restoring this Talk page and Archive5. Simesa 21:07, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: "The archiving was not done correctly. I went ahead and made the correct archive page for Archive 6. I have no idea where 5 went to. I would suggest posting it on the Administrator's Noticeboard and see if someone can locate 5 for you. When you do a move, be VERY careful of the spelling. A/a and P/p were messed up here. --Woohookitty 20:50, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Special Thanks

message: I archived the period June 22 to August 10 in Archive6.  I have no idea what happened to the messages from June 14 to June 21 - they weren't in this Talk page today and this is the first archive I've done. Simesa 21:38, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Archiving

message: I asked an admin to block 71.111.210.100 if they blank this article again. Simesa 20:22, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandal
Talk:American League Championship Series

message: I mentioned it on the main project page, but nonetheless, I am for a major rewrite of the MLB playoff series articles. I will start a template to categorize the rounds neatly. --Jay(Reply) 21:23, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In this rewrite can we put more information about the ALCS (and other series) such as, how home field advantage is determined? - Ianneub 16:48, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I deleted the tag; it's been there since jan '06 and the article is quite different now. --AndrewHowse 18:31, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion tag? 

message: Hi.  You are invited to comment on this RFC.  Thanks, --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 18:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC on related page
Talk:American League Division Series

message: Why is "If the 2006 Season ended today" a section? The season does not end today, and who's winning today doesn't matter unless today is the last day of the season and all games have been played. -- Win777 13:15, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: But the season does not end today

message: I found this:
"When MLB added a second wild card team in 2012, the Division Series re-adopted the 2-3 format due to scheduling conflicts. It reverted to the 2-2-1 format in 2013."
See the question about this in the NLDS talk page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.20 (talk) 18:10, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  what scheduling conflicts? 

message: Just out of curiosity: Why is there no American League Division Series Most Valuable Player Award? TheHade (talk) 08:59, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  MVP? 

message: Hi.  You are invited to comment on this RFC.  Thanks, --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 18:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC on related page 
Talk:National League Division Series

message: I edited the "If 2006 ended today" section, but I really think it should be deleted because its pointless and unless someone edits it EVERY DAY, its not accurate. 74.131.73.216 03:29, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The season does not end today

message: I find this remark:
"When MLB added a second wild card team in 2012, the Division Series re-adopted the 2-3 format due to scheduling conflicts. It will revert to the 2-2-1 format from 2013 onwards."
What scheduling conflicts?  There is the unrelated case of the Baltimore Ravens not being able to have that Thursday opening NFL game at home in the 2013 season, because of a conflict (common parking areas) with the already-scheduled Baltimore Orioles' game.
The question also affects the ALDS page.
:The regular-season and post-season schedules had already been set before an agreement was reached to add an additional wild-card team and a one-game playoff. Thus MLB had to figure out a way to fit in the additional playoff game, which it chose to do by eliminating a travel day from the division series (see ). isaacl (talk) 18:18, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  please elaborate on scheduling conflicts 

message: Hi.  You are invited to comment on this RFC.  Thanks, --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 18:10, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC on related page 
Talk:American League West

message: The A.L. Western Division needs to redirect to this article.
98.81.1.45 (talk) 00:41, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The American League Western Division needs... 

message: The Angels stopped using the name Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim in 2016, then began using Los Angeles Angels. GoodDay (talk) 03:02, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Los Angeles Angels
Talk:American League East

message: Some sections of this table appear to be inaccurate. For example, in 1998 - 2000, although Boston might have won the division, they did not go on to the World Series, let alone win. 
The template's design at present makes it appear that Boston won the World Series those years, when it was the New York Yankees. 
Raj Fra 23:20, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: AL East Champions by year template

message: I added the Ray's 2008 division championship to the list of division titles won by each team. Qazox (talk) 06:02, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Added Rays

message: In 2005, it was declared that both teams could claim to be division champions, because no tie-breaker was played.  The Yankees were considered the division winner only for playoff seeding purposes.  "If I were running the Red Sox," commissioner Bud Selig said last night, standing in the press box at US Cellular Field, "I would declare myself cochamps."  Selig's office, through a spokesperson, said the Yankees were declared champions of the East for postseason seeding purposes. Similarly, the Red Sox were declared wild-card winners for seeding purposes.
There is no established rule for whether a team is a cochampion.
"It's just a matter of common sense," Selig said.
So, are the Red Sox cochampions?
"That's an interesting question," Selig said. "Certainly, one could make that case."— Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.164.245.22 (talk) 13:53, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 2005 Division Winner
Talk:National League West

message: The National League Western Division needs to redirect to this article !  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.81.1.45 (talk) 23:38, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  National League Western Division needs... 

message: "National League Western Divison" MUST redirect here, unless the authors wish to be rated as complete knuckleheads!98.81.12.114 (talk) 14:13, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  National League Western Division
Talk:Chuckimation

message: *I don't think this page should really be counted as a "stub", because there really isn't that much else to say about chuckimation. Rubber cat 04:56, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: On a related note, is the subject matter notable? 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 11:13, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub?
Talk:1421

message: Removed *another time* the China part. That's nuts.
The part about China discovering the New World was saying that it was definite that it happened. I changed it so it shows it is just a theory. --72.138.9.208 06:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a hatnote now. 76.66.193.224 (talk) 02:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: China
Talk:Central Nacional de Inteligencia

message: Since the CNI is the main intelligence agency of Chile, this page should be moved to Central Nacional de Inteligencia (Argentina), and have a link to it in the CNI article. But it will stay here until the Chilean page is created --San Marcos 05:58, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't worry about it, when the time comes, we can make the changes. Or, as it usually happens, the second article has a disambiguation addition whereas the old one keeps its clean name. (If you can say the CNI can keep a clean name...   ;o)  ) Mariano(t/c) 07:15, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving and Chile
Talk:La Pietra

message: ummm... 
it says the name of the school is la pietra: school for girls,
but right after that it says it is a school for men 
(and the word men is in bold).
so, i feel like this incongruency was a deliberate prank.
i cannot verfiy whether this school is actually for girls or men,
so i am not in a position to be changing it at this point —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 131.247.152.4 (talk) 23:41, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Girls as per the web site (and its name). Vandalism was removed a while back. Still more plagerism to be removed too. W Nowicki (talk) 18:04, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  incongruency
Talk:Manarai Mountains

message: I removed a lot of unsubstantianted, nonsensical garbage from this article, with nonsense about Darth Plagueis's master and the creation of Anakin.  Without serious citations and ironclad references, a bombshell like that is going to get deleted, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and poorly written fanfic has no place at Wikipedia.  I rewrote the article to actually have factual content, with references. --Wingsandsword 06:38, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Jesus Born on This Day

message: OK, what happened to "Joy to the World" and "O Holy Night"?  And why does "Fantasy" have a 1994 release date?  I don't want to do anything until somebody explains. - Musiclover 06:45, 03 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Was "Jesus Born On This Day" an official release?  I don't recall this song ever being released, not even to "select" radio stations.  --Musiclover 22:24, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It was a radio promo OmegaWikipedia 22:47, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I had no idea.  I'll fix some of the links.  --Musiclover 04:04, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Masurian dialects

message: I don't know anything about Masurian, but it seems to me that this page could have a Polish nationalist POV.
My God, what is your problem. You Germans don't know when to quit. Please stop. --~
This article should be rewritten, it completely misinforms.Xx236 10:18, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm. The article states that the Germans treated them as Poles, tried to force a seperate identity upon them and Germanize them. They only voted against Poland because of a falsified vote and lies about a collapse of Poland. Then, after all these humiliations and mistreatment by Germany für almost 100 years, these people have the chance to live with Poles in Poland, ...but most of them leave Poland in just a few years and go to Germany??? Sorry, but something escapes me here. They prefer to live with the oppressor? This should be explained. Karasek (talk) 20:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other 

message: Can this claim be sourced, please?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Unoffensive text or character (talk • contribs) 09:34, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. I can only cite the German edition, where its on page 727. HerkusMonte (talk) 10:27, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Unoffensive text or character (talk) 09:29, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nazis using the Masurian dialect 

message: The noun used to illustrate inflection for case is not identified. What does it mean? Also, if this dialect is like other Slavic languages, there are probably multiple inflectional paradigms for different classes of nouns.Bill (talk) 04:19, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Case
Talk:Presence information

message: Generally someone who is unfamiliar with "presence information" will also be unfamiliar with a "presentity".  It's like answering someone's query about the formation for a peanut butter and jelly sandwich and saying, "Well, it's a sandwich with jelly and peanut butter." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.227.69.149 (talk • contribs) 16:28, 29 June 2006
There are some minor grammatical and spelling errors in the article.  Please review & clean up. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 125.22.79.124 (talk) 14:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just for the sake of understanding 

message: The vast majority of the text appears to refer to the situation as of the 2000s, including treating 2.5G and 3G cell phone services as new and instant messaging services as current terminology. A person knowledgeable in this subject should go through and bring references like this up to date, and include any neccesary new references. Fishmech (talk) 19:23, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article requires updates
Talk:1912 Triangular Tournament

message: Every team played each other twice.
Everyone played each other three times. The scorecard of the third Eng-Aus match contains the note that Wisden 1913 states "As no decision had been made prior to the tournament on how the winner would be decided, it was agreed that the final match would be played to a finish even if it takes a week."  
As an aside, this was the first 'timeless test' to be played in England. Tintin 07:19, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of matches
Talk:Anthony Radziwiłł

message: I've removed this: colon cancer, which had originated as testicular cancer, since it is clearly a mis-statement - probably meaning that the cause of death was testicular cancer, and that it had metastasized to the colon. I can't find the correct information (on the web), though, so it would be best to leave unstated till there's a citable reference. - Nunh-huh 07:34, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Most of the "Illness" section sounds like gossip or at least like a collection of mildly disjointed, certainly unencyclopedic touchy-feely Kennedy anecdotes. A good part of it is unsourced, too. I'd hack at the whole thing, but I thought I'd ask before I kick the usual hornets' nest. Complainer (talk) 11:46, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: May one cut some of the c.?

message: The wording of the paragraph re: his "Illness and Death" states that during the time he and his wife lived in New York and he was battling the recurrence of his cancer, he became especially close to his Aunt Jackie.  However, she died (in 1994) before he was married (in 1995).  Or perhaps he became close after he was first diagnosed with cancer in 1989?  It's not clear.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.189.255.35 (talk) 18:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timing 
Talk:Feature integration theory

message: "The feature integration theory, developed by Treisman and Gelade since the early 1980s has been one of the most influential models of human visual attention until recent years"
What has succeeded it? matturn 07:42, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The link above doesn't appear to work, but seems to be an important edit for this article. --Greenleaf22 (talk) 02:22, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Consider going further in depth in the lead section, expanding on definitions and explanations so the reader can get a clearer idea of what Feature Integration Theory is before launching into the stages. Also, work on the article coming together as a whole. Currently, the article reads very disconnected.
Use a footnote when citing specific terms coined by Treisman, such as "feature maps" and "saliency maps," especially since all your sources share the same author. Samjcummins (talk) 04:27, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thoughts on Article Cohesion
Talk:Smart key

message: I find the use of RSA here confusing, it reminds me of the RSA (algorithm). --Test35965 (talk) 05:45, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  RSA ≠ Rivest-Shamir-Adleman encryption! 

message: Hey everyone, I just wanted to point out that the S class is NOT the first vehicle to introduce this to the market. General Motors made the introduction with the 1993 C4.
Here is a link to see where you can buy the fob. Note it states 1993, thus, introduced BEFORE the s class in 1998.
https://www.corvettemods.com/C4-Corvette-1993-1996-Keyless-Entry-Remote-Key-Fob_p_14758.html
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.61.102.66 (talk) 04:33, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Different systems.  The C4 Vette had passive keyless entry, yes, but the ignition still used a conventional metal key.  108.200.234.93 (talk) 07:57, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  C4 Corvette 1993 Keyless Entry Remote Key Fob 

message: What if I told you that keyless entry as it exists today was invented by a team of engineers at Howard University in 2004, who did their senior project with General Motors and never received recognition for their numerous inventions including hybrid technology, electronic assist and turbo-electric regenergation? The fob key (people eventually started calling it a key fob) is named after the fob pocket, which is the small pocket on the inside of your jeans pocket that the key was originally designed to fit into.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2803:1500:1200:49D4:FDD2:E8D6:4BD2:8C22 (talk) 00:22, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Conspiracy theory
Talk:Chermside, Queensland

message: Does Kedron need it's own article? 
Navigation of the Brisbane Suburb Box may require it to.
Nicko6 05:44, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kedron 

message: Can anyone verify that Cobb and Co coaches really passed through the suburb on the way to Gympie in 1868?  According to books on Aspley, the track to Gympie via Aspley was not suitable for coaches and Cobb and Co Coaches didn't start travelling the route until the late 1870s.  They used to travel along the "Old Northern Road".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.63.52.242 (talk) 06:10, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cobb and Co 

message: As someone who lives near Chermside. No one. Not one person pronounces it Kerm Side. It's Ch-erm-side. Say it the way it is spelled.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.6.204.65 (talk) 02:03, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed! And since is no citation supporting the claim, I simply removed it. Kerry (talk) 02:32, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 
Talk:Intermission (film)

message: can the synopsis use the word 'incomplete' any more?
maybe as a verb? i have a hard time believing this is uncounsciously done as brain damaged writing.
bad writing , yes. as it seems someone is unable of confirming the presence of an idee-fixe or liet motif
without constantly using repetition.
:Wow, there are a ridiculous number of 'incomplete's there. I am surprised that the author didn't try to use the verb incompleted, not that it exists but it seems it would fit in nicely with the number of incompletes here. ~ SW 23:39, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This film had to have one of the best beginings ever when colin farrells chating up the girl in the shop and bam he totally changes in a secondBouse23 11:53, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion of incompleted text

message: The synopsis reads like an ad.  It's barely a spoiler at all, it doesn't say how anything ends, just that all endings are either funny, surprising, or unexpected - but nothing about how, why, or what the endings of each thread are. Gronky 23:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The synopsis is dire

message: It's rather odd that the budget for the film states as IR£5 million, although the Irish pound was no longer the currency of Ireland when the film was made (the Euro was). Xen 1986 16:01, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Budget for the film?

message: "In the biggest single stunt ever filmed in Ireland, a double-decker bus was flipped 20 metres into the air."
 - I don't know how to quantify the size of a "stunt". How is it the biggest?
 - The claim of 20 metres is highly unlikely. The General Post Office in Dublin is 15 metres high. I doubt they achieved this height with a double decker Dublin Bus.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larryone (talk • contribs) 16:01, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  20 metres?
Talk:Pierre Samuel

message: I believe he died recently? Charles Matthews 09:21, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I find this Amazon stuff sufficiently unbelievable that I think we need a reliable source for it being the same person.  Richard Pinch (talk) 20:42, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amazon 

message: You need to cleanup the formatting for your sources. It should be a number in the article to a number on the footnote list with the link or citation next to that number on the list. Have a nice day! 45Factoid44 (talk) 20:18, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources