Talk:Petroleum reservoir

message: The long quote by Ray Nurmi, while accurate as an example, might mislead some into thinking that all oil is ~500 million years old.  A more general view would be appropriate.Plazak 18:08, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. It really should be re-written more encyclopedically, but for now I just removed the first sentence of the quote. Cheers Geologyguy 18:30, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Oil formation

message: The article of this topic is relevant to natural gas too (and often these reservoirs have fractions of oil too). A better title could be Hydrocarbon reservoir. Are there any objections or other discussion? +mt 07:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You have an excellent point that gas should be included.  "Petroleum" is regarded in the industry as encompassing both oil and gas.  How about Petroleum reservoir?  Plazak (talk) 13:05, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've also thought that name, but I'm not sure if Petroleum is oil and gas or only crude oil (according to the Wikipedia article, petroleum has hydrocarbon lengths C5H12 to C42H86, which are all liquid). "Hydrocarbon" is technically more encompassing, since it includes oil and gas phases (or crude oil and natural gas). However, checking into my "Sedimentary Petrology" book (M.E. Tucker), petroleum is oil and gas as you mentioned. I'm not sure what is better: Wikipedia consistency or industry-speak consistency? +mt 19:31, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We can make it anything we want.  It would be easy to modify the Petroleum article to reflect the fact that it has both a popular meaning (crude oil) and a broader industry meaning (oil and gas).  I myself would vote for "Petroleum reservoir," because I think that it is the more common term within the industry, but either one would be preferable yo "oil reservoir."  Since we can set up redirects to point to a single article, either "Hydrocarbon reservoir" or "Petroleum reservoir" would be good.  Plazak (talk) 20:09, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, we'll go with petroleum reservoir, since it is more popular of the two (according to Google search hits), and uses more understandable terms (i.e., petroleum vs hydrocarbon). +mt 23:19, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hydrocarbon reservoir 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:35, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Reservoir modeling software screen snapshot of isopach map for 8500ft deep oil reservoir 28ft thick located in the Erath field, Vermilion Parish, Erath, Louisiana.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: I was looking for something on drive mechanisms and eventually arrived here via search after initially going to the Reservoir Engineering page expecting drive to be linked from there. I think the information presented here is a good start and could be expanded into a new article and linked from other relevant articles, such as this one and the reservoir engineering page. What are your views on creating a new article, possibly Drive Mechanism (Petroleum Reservoir)? Acb314 (talk) 13:29, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Split Drive Mechanisms section into new article?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Petroleum reservoir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.planetseed.com/node/15282
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:03, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hi all, I have been assigned to this article as a part of my curriculum for an Environmental Science class. I look forward to editing and clarifying a lot of the details in this article. I'm going to go over some of my basic plans before I start, just to give a chance for comments and suggestions.
* Add more about the geology and geography concerning reservoirs, as there is minimal information on geology besides their formation mechanisms and nearly nothing on geography (such as where in the world they form).
* There are multiple sources that are out of date in terms of their links, and potentially information. Some are only kept online through internet archives, which holds a bit of doubt to their legitimacy (why were they taken down in the first place, and why haven't better ones been found?).
* Some of the graphics about traps could use a graphical legend, rather than the text-based one that can be hard to interpret when looking back and forth at the different kinds of traps.
* There are some minimal grammar/formatting issues that are minimal, but enough to want to change or add some explanation for.
* Editing and fleshing out the Oil Field section + adding clarification about how an oil field can be a petroleum reservoir, but a petroleum reservoir doesn't necessarily have to be an oil field.
* Vetting Schlumberger Limited as a credible source, since they are a vast part of the petroleum and gas industry, and it's possible that there may be bias present in their sources (of which they make up 7 out of the 19 for this page).
There will undoubtedly be more that I will do to this article, but in the meantime, I wish you happy editing! Kikoeta (talk) 21:51, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Evaluation (October 2021)

message: As I come to a close for my editing on this article, I encourage anyone who has any questions or wants to refute something I have put in to leave a comment, as I will be reading them into the foreseeable future. I have some suggestions for things that could be edited or potential ideas that could be implemented if the consensus is that they should.
* The Formation section has an interesting bullet point by the name of "pressure cooking", which I was not focused on due to the issues with the Oil field section. I had noticed this in my initial evaluation, but my priorities were on making the article more coherent and reducing the issues with the previously mentioned section. I encourage someone to challenge this information, or at least expand on what exactly it is supposed to mean.
* It had been brought up by a peer reviewer for my article that it may make more sense to move the Oil field and Gas field sections to after the Formation section, as that could make more sense chronologically speaking. I would like some input on this before editing it myself, so let me know your opinion on that specific change.
I was unable to find any kind of bias in the Schlumberger sources for the article, and when used, there was no bias present. The Unconventional Reservoir section is something that I have pioneered and would appreciate feedback on and expansion of. The Production section is also sparse, and has grounds for removal or integration with a lead sentence into Drive mechanisms.
Happy editing! Kikoeta (talk) 22:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Heading forward and suggestions