lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Arable land

message: The article does not accurately represent the meaning of “arable land” as used by the FAO, the  World Bank and Eurostat.  The article describes it as land that “can actually be farmed (at minimum every five years) with crops that are sown and harvested within the same agricultural year. “  In fact, unlike the definition in the article’s first paragraph, the definitions used by these three agencies refer to land that is farmed..., not land that can actually be farmed.  The latter encompasses a very much larger land area.  
Among other concerns, the  erroneous description can lead readers to misinterpret very seriously the meaning of the article’s tabulated arable land data.  The “Arable land area” section should explicitly state that the FAO definition applies to data in the table and that the CIA’s definition, which applies to this section’s map, is similar to that of the FAO.  
The article’s section on “Non-arable land” gets off to a problematic start by failing to acknowledge that the nature of non-arable land will differ greatly depending on which definition of arable land is being considered (i.e. whether the definition refers to potential or actual cultivation for crop production).  For some land that is not arable according to the FAO definition, none of the listed limitations apply.  .  Moreover, this section fails to acknowledge that, regardless of the definition used,  much non-arable land is agriculturally valuable for grazing of livestock, especially ruminants, camelids and equines.  Because of the large area globally that is so used, this is an extremely serious omission.Schafhirt (talk) 16:50, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccurate description of FAO, World Bank and Eurostat usage of “arable land”
Talk:Antigua and Barbuda

message: It strikes me as odd that the pronunciation key in the lead cites UK and US pronunciations, but does not say how the actual citizens of the country pronounce its name. I’m not sure the best way to find a good source for this, but I think it should be added if possible. --EightYearBreak (talk)  17:29, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 
Talk:A Man for All Seasons (play)

message: An automated Wikipedia link suggester has some possible wiki link suggestions for the A_Man_for_All_Seasons article, and they have been placed on this page for your convenience.Tip: Some people find it helpful if these suggestions are shown on this talk page, rather than on another page. To do this, just add  to this page. — LinkBot 10:40, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Parts will look like Original Research if this is not corrected.HammerFilmFan (talk) 11:56, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  article has too few in-line citations 

message: The references to the common man as Brechtian, and the statement Brechtian alienation went totally over my head. The link goes to Bertolt Brecht, but gives no explanation for what Brechtian actually means. Is there anyone who would be able to clarify this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.96.60.185 (talk) 04:00, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brecht 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. per discussion consensus. DAB page to primary title, play to "(play)". (closed by non-admin page mover) — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 16:34, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 October 2022
Talk:As We May Think

message: An automated Wikipedia link suggester has some possible wiki link suggestions for the As_We_May_Think article, and they have been placed on this page for your convenience.Tip: Some people find it helpful if these suggestions are shown on this talk page, rather than on another page. To do this, just add  to this page. — LinkBot 10:41, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have corrected the date of the Life Magazine article - it is clearly the September 10th issue, and I can find numerous specific references to that ( ) whereas I cannot find any specific account of it appearing in any of the four November issues of Life - merely the vaguely repeated (and possibly originally ours) claim that it appeared in November. Phil Sandifer (talk) 16:53, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have the November edition in front of me and Bush isn't mentioned anywhere. And the German Wikipedia still mentions the November issue, citing a TAZ article from 2005 (http://www.taz.de/?id=archiv&dig=2005/11/22/a0157). So much for "reliable sources"... - Armin B. Wagner (talk) 02:37, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: LIFE

message: Just caught this---they were by editor User:Sofia Koutsouveli.  The extensive academic literature on hypertext---in particular, the 1991 Nyce/Kahn book---is very clear that the memex was not hypertext in any meaningful sense but merely inspired the development of hypertext. Any objections before I take out the garbage? --Coolcaesar (talk) 08:43, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uninformed edits on 17 March 2014
Talk:American shot

message: An automated Wikipedia link suggester has some possible wiki link suggestions for the American_shot article, and they have been placed on this page for your convenience.Tip: Some people find it helpful if these suggestions are shown on this talk page, rather than on another page. To do this, just add  to this page. — LinkBot 10:41, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We seriously need a photo or illustration to portray the American Shot. It's really hard to discern how this shot looks by the description alone. --Joel M. (talk) 18:08, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Photograpgh
Talk:Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis

message: An automated Wikipedia link suggester has some possible wiki link suggestions for the Acute_disseminated_encephalomyelitis article, and they have been placed on this page for your convenience.Tip: Some people find it helpful if these suggestions are shown on this talk page, rather than on another page. To do this, just add  to this page. — LinkBot 10:41, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Gupte 2003
Hynson 2001
Leake 2004
Anlar 2003
Pete.Hurd (talk) 06:07, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2008.03.009 also. JFW | T@lk 20:27, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Review articles to track down

message: "The mortality rate may be as high as 5%, however full recovery is seen in 50 to 75% of cases with increase in survival rates up to 70 to 90% with figures including minor residual disability as well." Wow this is confusing. If mortality rate is %5, how are the survival rates 70-90% instead of 95%? How is it a full recovery if the figures include minor residual disability? Kmcafert (talk) 17:20, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing sentence 
Talk:John Brown (servant)

message: Author:
While you add the needed citations, please include information about the funeral and burial of Mr. Brown: where, how - simply or with more respect than that of the usual servant's, did the Queen attend, did she visit the gravesite in following years, etc. That information would be as telling to the nature of Victoria and Brown's relationship as the information you include about his portraits and busts being destroyed by her jealous son.
Thank you. Wordreader (talk) 18:15, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Brown's body... 

message: This article contains two non-working links (currently References 2 and 3) to a Daily Mail article by Michael Thornton with the title 'Victoria's secret? New evidence shows Queen Victoria married her Scottish groom and bore him a secret daughter who was spirited to America'. Yet the text of the article makes no mention of such a daughter, which seems rather unsatisfactory, at least to me. Tlhslobus (talk) 02:59, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Their alleged daughter 
Talk:Jewish history

message: There are two references in this article to the national homeland of the Jewish people. I don't see either of them having a source. I suggest that the phrasing should be attributed to those who hold this view
E.g., the wording could be something like  'the re-establishment of the Jewish Nation in Israel which Zionism regards as the national homeland of the Jewish people'.  Not all Jews regard Israel as such. Alternatively the phrase national homeland could be replaced by simply homeland, e.g., 'the re-establishment of the Jewish Nation in its homeland'. There are controversies about whether there was ever a Jewish nation, as opposed to an Israelite one. The phrase homeland and  homeland in the Levant and homeland in the Land of Israel are used in this article.   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews  and are much to be preferred in my opinion. I have no doubt that this will need to be discussed, and there will be opposition. So I have added this here before any change is made. Regards. Pngeditor (talk) 12:58, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  national homeland? 

message: Anti-Jewish laws 2405:201:C015:1055:D59F:3C7C:65CF:9190 (talk) 12:41, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  English 

message: The end of the section on the 21st century only covers the period up to the 2011 census. The results of the 2021 census are now public knowledge, the article should be changed to reflect this. Cigarettes and corvids (talk) 22:18, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Added this Col99100 (talk) 18:47, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update to UK Jewish statistics
Talk:Digital Ash in a Digital Urn

message: I've got the Digital Ash in a Digital Urn/I'm Wide Awake, it's Morning promo, and it shows both album covers scaled down on the front, but the cover for "Digital Ash" is in completely different colors, (The backgroud is sky blue, the bee is dark blue, and the flowers are white). Does anybody know anything about the alternative cover, and if it was just quickly changed right before it's release? Underwater 00:31, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wait! Scratch that! On AMG the cover shows a flower on a toilet seat, and a man standing behind another flower... . No bee at all. So, the two covers are even more different than I thought they were.... anybody know what's up with that? Underwater 00:35, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The cover uses odd colors with black as a background, so I think that it is hard to see it all at once, and especially hard to distinguish it on a jpeg. The AMG version has all the elements, but that's not the impression you actually get from it. --Andland 09:58, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Album Cover
Talk:Last stone game

message: This is a duplicate article with Nim. I don't have time right now to attempt a merge, but at some point anything in this article which would make the Nim article better should be added there, and then this page should probably be made into a redirect to Nim (which is the English name of the game). For the time being I'll just add a note. Onebyone 11:46, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Mateine

message: __NOINDEX__
The infomation listed on "mateine"  is complete bunk. Mateine was made up by mate vendors to have a selling point for an awful tasting drink. I have a medical background and I have talked to doctors and non of them have heard of the substance.
:Awful tasting is just your personal POV. I personally think that coffee is awful tasting. That doesn't mean that I'm going to go to its talk page and use it as an argument about the commercialization of coffee. Try making your point while sticking to a neutral point of view.—WAvegetarian•CONTRIBUTIONSTALK• EMAIL•05:08, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I would like someone to present some concrete evidence on the subject. Everybody cites everybody else. I know one thing for certain: There IS a difference between Mateine and Caffeine. The evidence is there: people that can't drink coffee, or are allergic to caffeine can drink maté. I am a maté drinker and have recommended it to several friends who could not drink coffee. None of them had the adverse reactions that coffee gave them. Evidently there is a difference, and people will have to admit it, be it a different element, or the maté having factors that alter the way your body responds to the Maté. Maybe mateine was invented by the maté industry, but it's hard for me to admit it due to the amount of people I've known that have tried maté.
Issachar
:There isn't any difference between "mateine" and caffeine. The problem is that people assume that the only stimulant in coffee and black tea is caffeine. There is actually a whole cocktail of various types of stimulants, which is a different mix depending on the plant you are consuming. The mix found in yerba mate is different than that found in coffee. The allergic reaction is not from the caffeine alone but from the mix. It's like having a bad drug interaction. Caffeine (mateine) is a central nervous system stimulant; it is other things in the cocktail that cause jitters from coffee and smooth muscle tissue relaxation from mate. This whole argument is due to oversimplification. Chemistry is complicated. Don't expect everything to make sense when you simplify it. It's like trying to do physics without Calculus; it only half works.—WAvegetarian•CONTRIBUTIONSTALK• EMAIL•05:08, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mateine.
Talk:Equidistributed sequence

message: This sounds like the same thing as a uniform distribution. Can we just redirect this page there? —Caesura 12:38, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: NO!  Uniform distribution is about random variables.  This is about non-random sequences!  (The first paragraph was incredibly confusing about just that point, but I've fixed it.)  Michael Hardy 18:56, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sound 

message: Hi Mike, 
I'm thinking that equidistribution mod 1 should be made into a sbsection of this article ... is taht what you have in mind?  linas 23:54, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge suggestion - go for it 

message: After merge cleanup for redundancy, and expert attention. Ste4k 06:12, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup 

message: The discrepancy needs to be defined in this article, and some work done conjointly on Discrepancy theory.  Richard Pinch (talk) 07:11, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made a start.  Richard Pinch (talk) 10:49, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy 

message: Should Equidistribution theorem be merged into this article?  Richard Pinch (talk) 10:49, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another merger 

message: I don't think that the following makes sense:
The sequence {αn} is equidistributed mod 1 for almost all values of α.
Clearly all you need do is take any α with modulus less than 1 to see that you get a convergent sequence which doesn't have the equidistributed property?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thudso (talk • contribs) 09:37, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Almost all provided that α > 1.  The result was proven by Koksma in 1935. Spacepotato (talk) 19:17, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problematic Example 

message: Hi, I cleaned up this page (the headings were really confusing and unrelated - things related to equidistribution mod 1 were not under equidistribution mod 1, for instance) and added some content. Also, I decided to be bold and merge the article on Weyl's criterion into this page. This is my first serious edit in Wikipedia, any feedback is welcome :) Yoni (talk) 17:16, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned up 
Talk:Superstar in a Housedress

message: It turns out this is almost exactly the same text as the plot summary at IMDB which was written by the film's writer, director, producer Craig Highberger. This is the first possible copyright violation that I've found and am not sure what to do, but I think that I did it properly. gK ¿? 12:48, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot
Talk:Ma On Shan line

message: Template: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Slambo (Speak) 15:58, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of Template:{{ucfirst:Ma On Shan Rail infobox}} 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Maroon Line (Hong Kong). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Onel5969 TT me 09:59, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Maroon Line (Hong Kong)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Chūichi Nagumo

message: Moved from the article:
:"The info. concerning his death appears to be incorrect as he died in July/44 and the Battle of Midway was in June of 1942."
--דוד ♣ D Monack 08:23, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  text removal 

message: A large portion of this is copied from here. Anyone know if that is freely shared info or copyrighted?--Nobunaga24 09:21, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyvio 

message: I deleted
:"the massive aircrew losses at the Battle of the Eastern Solomons and the Battle of the Santa Cruz Islands would prove decisive to the performance of the Japanese navy in later engagements."
because Midway was far & away more important.  TREKphiler hit me ♠  22:29, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Indecisive
Talk:Phase distortion synthesis

message: As I recall the output of my CZ-1000 on a scope back in 1989,  the CZ synths actually generated real sawtooth waves, so I'm deleting the next comment until I can sample a pure saw from the CZ and see it in Audacity:
on the CZ synths, the waveform is a rather sine wave shaped saw wave approximation.
Samboy 13:14, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: Somebody deleted the image of the saw wawe transform for no good reason. To me this is proof of the inherent instability and failure of Wikipedia. Neither me nor Simon Jenkins wanted to take credit for being able to push buttons on a program plotting out depictions of functions. Oh well ... If you want your facts straight, don't look here. MX44 18:12, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image deleted 

message: This part refers to the CZ synths using a hard sync trick to resemble a resonant filter. If I'm not mistaking then this has nothing to do with phase distortion synthesis. Shouldn't it be moved to the oscillator sync article? --213.176.148.218 15:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, but phase distortion synthesis is so hardwired to the CZ series so I believe it really ought to stay around here. MX44 17:29, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simulating a resonant filter 

message: This article needs more context, and more background information. For the first two paragraphs, I thought it was talking about DNA synthesis.
Pharpend (talk) 17:39, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context
Talk:London Journal

message: Bosworth?  You mean Boswell, don't you?  P Ingerson 14:19, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: * I understand that the nature of something's popularity is not something easily empirically proven, but I would wonder what truth is in this?  The work is an actual journal, and a snapshot of the literary world of London during the height of the 18th Century, as well as a compelling coming of age story.  Labelling it as an exciting sex romp seems to do it a grave disservice in my opinion.  Any thoughts? --Ryan Heuser 23:55, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Its popularity stems more from its sexual candor..."
Talk:Chud

message: Changed the spelling and moved the article to Chudes. I wonder whether the information is NPOV.--Wiglaf 14:25, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous move

message: This move has been also discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chud (disambiguation). In particular,  has proposed:
Normal form for (non-mythical) people appears to be singular: Inuit, Aborigine. Thus move Chudes to Chud put  at the top of it and C.H.U.D., leave CHUD pointing as it is now, and still delete this disambig.
I think that this is the best possible solution to resolve the possible conflicts between chud, chudes, C.H.U.D., and CHUD, with the additional advantage of removing the redundant and useless page Chud (disambiguation). Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 17:05, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a note at Talk:C.H.U.D.. Physchim62 (talk) 13:32, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

text: This move affects that page: thank you for leaving a note there (I should have done it myself). Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 16:54, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: This article should provide some references.
got some, going to work further with it.--Termer 04:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No references!

message: Is that box really necessary on the page and specially on the top of the page? Chud is a general term for different Finnic groups and therefore part of the history of many different tribes, nations etc. In this light that infobox seems little exaggerated. What do you think? --Velivieras (talk) 18:40, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This issue didn`t stirr up much debate. I considered to be best to remove the box because of arguments mentioned above.--Velivieras (talk) 13:01, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "History of Estonia" -box

message: I removed the following unsourced sentence: "Later sources used chud to describe other Finnic peoples called volok, which is thought to refer to the Karelians." "Volok" is Russian for "portage" and as far as I know it wasn't used as an ethnonym. I guess, that sentence is supposed to be about "Chud' Zavolochskaya", which means "Chudes of the land across the portages" (see ru:Заволочье and ru:Чудь заволочская), but for now the sentence is wrong. Q-Wert-273 (talk) 15:38, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Volok people? 