Talk:Saavik

message: "It should be noted, however, that if Saavik's mixed ancestry were to be made canon, it would violate the continuity created by the Star Trek: The Original Series episode "Balance of Terror" (which takes place after Saavik's birth) in which Starfleet learns for the first time that Romulans resemble Vulcans, a fact that appears to be unknown to Vulcans as well.)" -- I wouldn't be surprised if Vulcans were ashamed of being related to Romulans and hid this fact from their fellow Federation members. :) Alensha 23:20, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't be surprised either, given current events on Star Trek: Enterprise. There is in fact a Romulan-related story arc coming up on 2005, so it's possible we might learn a bit more. 23skidoo 15:13, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: 2004

message: Someone has really messed up the main image here. Can anyone track down the original uploaded file? I can't find it anymore. 23skidoo 00:33, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: And now the copyright police have deleted it completely. Can anyone upload a properly sourced fair use image of the character? 23skidoo 18:36, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: :Image:RobinCurtis.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:RobinCurtis.jpg

message: NOTE: The Star Trek Storybook for III explicitly says Saavik is half-human and half-Vulcan -- admittedly, this is probably a slip, and definitely "non-canon".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.189.161.158 (talk) 14:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: September 2007

message: First she was a Lieutenant JG not a Lieutenant in all canon appearances and second none of the Star Trek character articles use rank in the title (neither do the ones for seaQuest DSV, JAG, Star Wars, etc.) Dr. Stantz (talk) 19:35, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved back to Saavik 

message: I agree that the article is poorly written. I could re write it,  but I have clashed with Wikinazis before when I have rewritten articles for clarity. (that's why I dont have a log in name anymore- I decided it was pointless).
If no one objects in a timely manner, I may clarify some sentences for readability. I promise not to take away anything, and may even add a bit here or there. I wish I had the old Starlog magazines of the time to quote directly, but I could add the general knowledge that: A> "Someone stupid told Alley to cry" Leonard Nimoy ~ I Am Spock.
B> Alley did not know how to play the character (her own admission, confirmed by Nimoy) BUT that Nimoy supported her entirely (confirmed by Nimoy in I Am Spock). etc etc  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.174.83.232 (talk) 16:38, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re Write the article 

message: The section "Fictional biography" contains a whole back and forth about what is canon and non-canon and arguments about whether or not this violates continuity. It's a mess of speculation and large chunks of it should be removed. 
The article should stick to what reliable sources actually say. -- 109.79.168.149 (talk) 19:17, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-canon