lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Chaplin Revue

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#:a (tagged and captioned):  b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
#Overall: 
#:a Pass/Fail: 
Well done. Garinus 06:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA 

message: i know the article is by and large decent but the lead is really rather short. Chensiyuan 06:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: do you mean to say "compilation" in the first line of the lead? Chensiyuan 07:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

text: *extended the lead - will do some more later when im not so busy.. have also traded 'compliation' for a better phrase LordRobert 07:18, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: comment
Talk:Professional negligence in English law

message: This article appears at first read to be original research, because the only footnotes are case citations, which are primary sources, and the text itself consists largely of summaries of various court decisions, with wikilinks to articles on those decisions.  The articles on the cases in turn lack any footnotes to anything other than case citations in most instances.  On the other hand, there is a list of references to scholarly secondary reliable sources  which I presume are the actual sources for the text of this article, but because there are not in-line citations, it is difficult, if not impossible to verify what they are being referenced for. Clearly the article is notable, but it needs to be rewritten based on those secondary sources rather than on original research, with appropriate inline citation to those sources. Banks Irk (talk) 17:46, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better references needed
Talk:Duchess of Wails

message: This episode is an important one since it deals with the "main plot" of the entire show.  There is another episode in Season 4 of FHIF that also dangers the status of the characters.  I am setting up another article very soon.--Wardog108 04:10, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

message: First of all, are all the clips really needed? They kind of clutter the article, and they're not too well spaced. Aside from that, the tone of this article more resembles a fan site or individual commentary than a neutral summary of the episode. Any help on cleanup would be appreciated. Lucky number 49 15:37, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images, Tone
Talk:New Zealand DSC class locomotive

message: :Hi, about 2257 was she acutualy scrapped, because I saw pictures dateing from 2010 on the Flickr site, but or is she at New Plymouth, can you find out for me please.:203.109.168.212 (talk) 04:13, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi - Wikipedia is not a forum --LJ Holden 09:08, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Dsc 2257
Talk:New Zealand DSG class locomotive

message: I've removed the statement "Eventually DSGs are going to be replaced by DCs rebuilt as heavy shunters." from the article. Apart from the fact that the DC class locomotives are a whole lot older than the DSG class locomotives and are generally tired, there has been no hint or mention of such eventualities from KiwiRail or anyone else. 122.60.136.225 (talk) 09:04, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that. There's been a number of these additions made for no apparent reason, unfortunately we've missed some of them. --LJ Holden 22:35, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "DC class replacement"

message: Engine type lists Inline 6 diesel engine, number of cylinders says 16. Can't be both! 2406:E003:1C37:3601:201C:6F8A:9FF5:6980 (talk) 09:12, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engine description?
Talk:New Zealand DX class locomotive

message: With both DXRs currently stranded north of Kaikoura due to the earthquake, is it worth labelling them as out of service or at least putting something regarding the earthquake in their notes? --Megatronacepticon (talk) 12:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd keep them listed as in service; they're not withdrawn, just trapped. pcuser42 (talk) 18:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  DXRs still in service? 

message: We've still got a tag at the top of the article asking for inline citations which I beleive are now adequate. Thoughts anyone? --LJ Holden 01:44, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Is this rebuild program a replacement program for new locomotives, which are mentioned in the withdrawals? --LJ Holden 20:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, so the section stating that the locomotives will be replaced is still correct? --LJ Holden 06:56, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Finally read the Railfan mag - it states that the new locos won't proceed for now. --LJ Holden 08:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  DXE class
Talk:Otira Tunnel

message: I'm not sure enough about reports on tunnel safety to edit the article and wonder if anyone else knows more? When I search for TranzAlpine journeys over the next few days I get the message "Capacity not yet released". A story on One News on 9 June 2023 described a  a "poorly maintained" tunnel and an undated advert for water pumps says, "The build up of coal dust from over the years, has come to the point where the passenger service has been halted through the tunnel. Instead, passengers are taken by busses". Was that the closure reported in a 2013 Stuff article? Johnragla (talk) 08:16, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safety closure
Talk:Do Black Patent Leather Shoes Really Reflect Up?

message: The picture is actually not of the Playbill cover as stated but it is the cover picture of John's novel by the same name. Signed, JaNelle Powers (Mrs. John Powers)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6000:A340:19B4:F947:96BB:3309:CF39 (talk) 16:58, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture citation
Talk:Ace Duck

message: As much as I like Ace, he is totally not notable enough to warrant his own page - or have the pics of both action figure variations, for that matter. He had only cameos in the cartoon and was a minor character in Archie's comics. The S 04:45, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I DISAGREE!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.21.221 (talk) 03:35, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge into character list
Talk:Maelcum Soul

message: Am I the only one who thinks these various slim "Dreamlander" articles should perhaps be grouped into one page? 
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.61.118.78 (talk) 04:48, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dreamlanders

message: These sections from other articles might have good prose and references: Divine_(performer)#John_Waters_and_Divine's_first_films:_1966–68, Dreamlanders, and John_Waters#Early_career StrayBolt (talk) 18:14, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related articles for sources
Talk:JDS Mirai

message: Part of the article makes the claim "There are several statements by characters in the story that the maximum range of the Mirai's weapons is 270 miles. The maximum range of the Tomahawk is approximately 1500 miles. That discrepancy suggests that even if the missiles in the story are called Tomahawks, they really aren't."
This is not quite correct. The basic land attack Tomahawk does inded have a range of about 1500 miles. However, it is in no way the only Tomahawk missile to be produced. The anti-ship version of the Tomahawk (TASM) has a range of almost exactly 270 miles, and thus is most likely what is referred to in the manga and anime. In addition, it's possible that such a weapon could be considered consistent with Japan's constitutional prohibition against offensive weaponry, since anti-ship missiles have a clear defensive role. — Red XIV (talk) 05:10, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What's interesting about the Mirai using the anti-ship Tomahawk is that particular variant of the missile was only ever used by the U.S. Navy, and never exported.  In addition, the TASM was withdrawn from use at least a decade ago, although I'd need to look up the exact date. Musashi1600 (talk) 11:25, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

text: What does it matter?  There are plenty of conflicting claims for the range of various weapons systems out there.  Hell, if most claims for the ceiling of the SA-2 were true, no U-2s would have ever been shot down.  Andy Christ (talk) 08:02, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tomahawks

message: There should be some info from the Umidori page here. 132.205.44.5 (talk) 01:01, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  mergefrom MVSA-32J Umidori 

message: The title of this page refer to Mirai as DDG 182 which is incorrect. The ship is refer in the series as "DDH" (helicopter destroyer) not "DDG" 182 (guided missile destroyer), the insignia on the cap of the crew is clearly identified the ship as DDH (and even the image title itself is already use the term DDH 182 on the file sources). I have already edited all of the references in the page that I have seen, still have no idea how to edit the heading and the displayed image title though.
Interestingly, the name DDH 182 is already existed in real life as the JDS Ise, one of the Hyuga-class helicopter destroyer. Might be interesting to some detail of that here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.89.88.237 (talk) 15:10, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change
Talk:Eggplant Wizard

message: HEY!  Who got rid of my article?! - Smashman202 05:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't worry, I've brought it back. Now it's my article, hahahaha - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 13:09, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Deadeye

message: "Single deadeye" is a misnomer; deadeyes always have three or more holes. One hole makes it a bullseye. Pjbflynn 05:25, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Jack Barry (game show host)

message: Is there any confirmation that it was indeed cardiac arrest that killed Jack?  Every obituary that I read said he had died of a heart attack.  I know many get the two confused.  Just wondering. 72.92.210.44 (talk) 09:44, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cause of Jack's death

message: The second section, after "Early Life" is "After the Scandal"  There obviously is missing information between these sections, about the "scandal". 108.225.17.141 (talk) 14:27, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  After the Scandal
Talk:BNCR Class A

message: While creating the Infobox for this article, I realised the loco history is quite complex with four owners involved, and rebuilding from a compound to two classes of simples. Therefore, I think it might be more manageable to create two articles, one on the unrebuilt Class A and the other on the rebuilt Class A1. This article, named BNCR Class A1, would be moved to BNCR Class A and the new article would be named NCC Class A1. Geologue 05:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split the article
Talk:NCC Class U2

message: This article requires a major edit. The content of the text suggests that a previous editor may at times be referring to engines other than Class U2. This would be understandable; NCC locomotive history, especially that of the various classes of 4-4-0s is complex and potentially confusing. I concur with R.M. Arnold  Page 64. when he writes "... we seem to be in a world of fantasy, of rebuilding, renumbering, reclassifying which, though for the sake of standardisation only, seems merely to complicate the situation."
The list of locomotives in the table is incomplete - there were 18 engines in the class.
Regarding the reference to the LMS 2P locomotive, a comparison of the principal dimensions of the two classes shows that they really quite different. 
Geologue 02:07, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Amarkov 2

message: Edit count for User:Amarkov using Interiot's tool:
Category: 56  
Image talk: 2  
Image: 19  
Mainspace 963  
Portal: 3  
Talk: 391  
Template talk: 64  
Template: 172  
User talk: 1110  
User: 824  
Wikipedia talk: 1195  
Wikipedia: 4602  
avg edits per page 3.50  
earliest 22:43, 15 September 2006  
number of unique pages 2688  
total 9401  
Check it if you want, I figured I might as well save someone else the time of doing this.-Amarkov moo! 05:32, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Gifu Memorial Center

message: Added pics from Commons. Douggers (talk) 04:11, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures
Talk:Practical Common Lisp

message: I am not an authority on Lisp and my "review" of this excellent book was really an essay on general programming topics, not a book review. Therefore, the link to "Practical Common Lisp" at www.developerdotstar.com is misleading, and I have removed it. - Edward G. Nilges
1. Why this book is good introduction to Lisp programming language? - not any other?
2. How did it affect on something?
3. Criticism
4. Which parts of the ANSI Common Lisp standard this book doesn't describe?
5. Any recommendations of famous in programming world people? Institutes? Etc.
6. History
Sorry for my English.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.252.227.61 (talk) 11:41, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/2007-06-26

message: I am lost at why this page cant be created and feel the editor of it is just being Bias, 
tried to email him, he couldnt be bothered replying, 
nice — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deathsee (talk • contribs) 06:19, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tarbela Dam

message: There is plenty of incorrect information in this article:
1) largest reservoir
2) largest man made structure
3) largest single contract 
189.188.227.71 (talk) 06:42, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Information 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.pakistaneconomist.com/issue1999/issue30/f&m4.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Zachlipton (talk) 22:55, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Its very funny to read there that it is the world's fifth largest dam. :DNimrainayat6290 (talk) 20:52, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong information... 

message: A lot of retired peoples are residing in Tarbela especially in Sobra city, Sanober Colony, Mehran Colony and Main Colony. The Civil-II administration is unable to expel them.There for lot of months have to be waited to acquire family accommodation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.47.25.46 (talk) 12:38, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  House accommodation For New Employees
Talk:Stanley Skewes

message: Is this ref wrong?129.31.71.161 06:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've copied the page to my Sandbox in preparation for a re-write. Please let me know if you have anything to add. Wyatt Tyrone Smith (talk) 14:54, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Kwanusila

message: This site has a very thorough accounting of the pole that differs in a number of significant details.
http://www.3750lsd.net/posts/history-kwa%CC%B1nusila-thunder-maker-totem-pole-addison-street-lake-shore-drive/
Wegerje (talk) 22:12, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I found a photo, but it's a bit blurry. Let's get a better one if possible. Speciate 06:47, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: here's one, I run by the thing all the time I'll see if i can get some better photos :) Victor Grigas (talk) 05:50, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/June 29, 2007

message: the main page picture for the "Shuttle-Mir Program" should show both Mir and the Shuttle. There is a very good picture in the article that does this. --Duk 06:38, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No Raul654 14:04, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, responded there. --Duk 15:09, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:FAQ/Organizations

message: Caynu (talk) 15:37, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  I want my company to have a wiki page. 

message: Teleshowupdates is the form of the written updates [ text written form ] of any serial which was broadcast on the television in other words we can say it the written episode update of just broadcast on television.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rohan.karki9 (talk • contribs) 16:32, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tele Show Updates 

message: Can I make a post to my compatriots at the Community Portal of "My" dot wikipedia.org(not english speaking) to edit an article in en.wikipedia.org concerning my country?  Τζερόνυμο (talk) 10:32, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this canvassing ? 

message: I think this page should be merged into Wikipedia:FAQ/Article subjects. Both have Qs about "me and my company" or similar, there's a lot of duplication, and its easier to refer to a single target in other FAQs and notification templates, etc. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:34, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've started by copying over a couple of Q&As that were equally applicale but mussing on the AS page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Merged. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Abandoned Articles/Archives/2007/6

message: I'm finding it really hard to get Wiki time in right now.  Don't worry, though, I'm not quitting Wikipedia any time soon.  I'm going to move my name to the "Inactive" list on the main WP:PJAA page.  Cheers!!!  (Happy Towel Day!!!)  Ninetywazup?Review meMy ToDo 23:10, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I had put the previous up earlier, but don't know if anyone saw... Ninetywazup?Review meMy ToDo 17:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, Ninety- hope you come back if you have the time! Sr13 23:23, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Note that this doesn't mean that I'll just totally quit the project, I'll just not be regularly participating (not that ever was, which was part of my motivation for this...) Cheers!!!  Ninetywazup?Review meMy ToDo 20:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaving...
Talk:General-purpose input/output

message: Anyone know what "compounded by the resemblance to GP1 and GP0" means? Can we clarify this?Paul Foxworthy 12:33, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt it's universal, but AVRs have 5V TTL GPIOs. --Josh Atkins (talk - contribs) 11:08, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007

message: Are not x86 25-pin DB-9F parallel ports (commonly named “LPT”) also some sort of GPIO if you reuse the port's 8 output and 4 input (this many in SPP mode) for “hobbyist” work? —j.engelh (talk) 16:12, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Types of GPIO 

message: A good reference about gpio could be that: http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/Documentation/gpio.txt GNUtoo(my point of views(for npov)) | talk 11:48, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Ball and Chain (Big Mama Thornton song)

message: How is it that Big Brother famously performed the song in 1967, but Thornton did not release her song until 1968?  How did Big Brother get the song?  There must have been a demo recording, or sheet music, or something like that, from which they learned her song.  Or is there a mistake?   We should try to find out more.  I'll copy the information from Big_Mama_Thornton#Career, but we should get more, preferably from an online source. DougHill (talk) 18:22, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Copied.  But if that copied source is correct, how did Bay-Tone Records get the copyright?  Did Thornton sign it over?  The quoted segment makes it sound like their failure to release the song earlier had something to do with the copyright, but this is unclear. DougHill (talk) 18:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The complete AllMusic quote is "Early-'60s 45s for Irma, Bay-Tone, Kent, and Sotoplay did little to revive her sagging fortunes, but a series of dates for Arhoolie that included her first vinyl rendition of "Ball and Chain" in 1968 and two albums for Mercury in 1969-1970 put her back in circulation (Janis Joplin's overwrought but well-intentioned cover of "Ball and Chain" didn't hurt either). ".  In looking through online sources, there is no mention of an earlier recording.  It is certainly possible Joplin picked up the song from Thornton from live performances (both were active in the Bay Area at the same time).  The Bay-Tone claim sounds suspicious: a copyright is filed by the composer (a person, not a record company).  The Arhoolie single shows the songwriter as "W. M. Thornton" and the publisher as "Baytone Music" (see image in infobox); Joplin & BB listed the writer as Thornton (A publisher takes a cut of the fees, but not all, unless the songwriter signed their rights away).  BMI lists the songwriter as Thornton, but with a different publisher.  If the statement by Bay-Tone is true, why isn't someone else listed?  It is possible that a former manager or record label is just trying to muddy the waters for whatever reason.  If it had been recorded earlier, why hasn't it surfaced anywhere (bootleg or otherwise)?  The Bay-Tone statement in the article should be rewritten to reflect that it conflicts with other reliable sources. —Ojorojo (talk) 15:14, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  Go ahead, or I'll try later. DougHill (talk) 17:37, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology
Talk:Malach

message: Why does Malach as a supposed character by JRR Tolkien go to someone named Marach? Could someone undo that? It's not the same name. 2604:2000:F209:2700:798D:FE01:BFEA:F97D (talk) 17:45, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does Malach as a supposed character by JRR Tolkien go to someone named Marach?
Talk:Iwami Ginzan Silver Mine

message: I have classified this article as a start. There is room for expansion on history and its heritage value. Capitalistroadster 07:14, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start classification
Talk:Boylston Street

message: There is no mention anywhere in the citations that Boylston Street was named after Ward Nicholas Boylston. It seems more likely that it was named after his relative, Dr. Zabidiel Boylston.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.67.176 (talk) 13:17, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming

message: Boylston Street in Boston ends at a large intersection involving Park Dr., Brookline Ave., The Fenway, and slip roads which lead ultimately to the Jamaicaway. It does not continue south through Brookline - that is Brookline Ave. Brookline's Boylston begins where Washington St. - which is the direct continuation (albeit for a few blocks) of Huntington Ave in Boston. See this map. 65.19.79.155 (talk) 05:44, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Street Ending