lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fortifications of Metz

message: I've re-arranged the forts listed so they are in order of direction. I've also added a link to apage with a map. Swanny18 (talk) 00:17, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: I was looking for a discussion of the 1870 fortifications. Further Howard's The Franco-Prussian War claims Metz blocked the path to the French heartland for "ten centuries." Can that be right?  Paul, in Saudi (talk) 09:59, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 1870?

message: The initial article appears to have been written using American spelling. Certainly, the first use of any spellings that differ between American and British usage were American. —Stephen (talk) 21:38, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: I suggest to make it clearer that this article only concerns the contemporary (XXth century) fortifications. Metz has been fortified since the roman ages, and still visible are those from the middles ages and modern era (see the French article).
--Olivier Debre (talk) 11:14, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Time precision
Talk:Ajantha (2009 film)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Procedural move and revert the undiscussed swap of the 2009 film and 2012 films that occurred in 2016 after previously rejected PRODs, with no AFD or RM discussion   — Amakuru (talk) 11:32, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Ajantha (2012 film) →  – The film first released in 2009. DareshMohan (talk) 07:58, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 November 2022 

message: I propose merging Ajantha (2012 film) into Ajantha (2009 film). I think the content in Ajantha (2012 film) can easily be explained in the context of Ajantha (2009 film), and a merger would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in Ajantha (2009 film).DareshMohan (talk) 20:45, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Pont des Arts

message: Hi, this page seemed a bit sparse for such a famous bridge so I added some more info from the French wiki. Let me know if anyone does like a particular part and I'll remove it. Lazulilasher (talk) 01:52, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added more translation from French page 

message: The article on Auguste Comte claims that he tried suicide by jumping off it, but the image gives me the impression that such an attempt will most probably fail. Or? Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 12:03, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Jumping?
Talk:Shanty Hogan

message: Why were the billings reversed in Boston? Because Hogan had played there? Don’t drop interesting trivia like that without some kind of explanation, please! — crism (talk) 18:47, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As the person who wrote the article, I didn't add an explanation because the source didn't provide it. I'm not sure why they were billed as "Cohen and Hogan" in the first place, but my supposition was that the article implied that the billing was shifted because Hogan was Irish and from Boston. As this is entirely supposition on my part, I couldn't add that to the article. Alansohn (talk) 19:08, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why Hogan & Cohen?
Talk:Moulin de la Galette

message: Does anyone know of a reputable reference that states that the windmill was first known as "Palace Windmill"?  For now, I'm going to take that name out, but if someone finds a good reference it can easily be popped back in. Thanks!--CaroleHenson (talk) 22:56, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Palace Windmill" 

message: Hi, I'm seeing French sources for some of this info (that's all my limited French can tell), but I'm wondering if someone can find an English source - or translate something from French.  I've left this in the article, because it seems likely this is sourced, but someone may disagree and wish to pull it.
"The Debray family acquired the two mills in 1809 for producing flour, the "Blute-fin" and the "Radet", built in 1717. But it was also used to pressurize the harvest or grind materials needed for manufacturing. An association "Friends of Old Montmartre" saved it from destruction in 1915. In 1924, its owner moved the windmill to the corner of Girardon and Lepic streets. It was restored in 1978, but is not running. The windmill has been classified as a monument since 1939."--CaroleHenson (talk) 01:33, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone source windmill info?  Just see French sources 
Talk:Centre of New Industries and Technologies

message: I don't have time to work through the article myself, but there is some interesting information here - Gadzarts.
A blogger suggests that Nervi was a consultant on the project.
The French version of the article has more information as well.
Muchado (talk) 08:09, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: file::c:File:La Defense dsc07138.jpg Reason:Copyvio (as stated in :Category:CNIT, the architects died less than 70 years ago) and no :c:COM:FOP in France.  Maybe some files are de minimis (I excluded some obvious files), I let the community decide on that. subpage:link 
Message automatically deposited by a robot on 09:15, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  File nominated for deletion on commons 
Talk:Sammy Strang

message: The page on Engel Stadium mentions that Joe Engel bought the Chattanooga Lookouts from Sammy Strang in 1931.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:305F:B560:E10A:62DF:D94D:4D54 (talk) 15:15, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Owner of the Lookouts?
Talk:Top Banana (video game)

message: This article has a fan-written feel...
138.243.129.4 11:55, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 
Talk:Capesthorne Hall

message: #The stub needs to be considerably expanded.
#It should make use of sections.
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
Peter I. Vardy 14:33, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 
Talk:Pavillon de Breteuil

message: "It is a legal enclave (considered international territory) following from a 1969 agreement with the French government." Other pages say that it escaped occupation in WWII for this reason; if this is the case it must have been before 1969. --Random832 (contribs) 16:13, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sources are needed to clarify this. Jonathunder (talk) 23:30, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency
Talk:Stade Yves-du-Manoir

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved to Stade Yves-du-Manoir
None of the 4 responding editors supports the original proposal or opposes a move to Stade Yves-du-Manoir per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:CONCISE.  Target name already redirects here and appears to be WP:PRIMARY per 162 etc.
(non-admin closure)  Havelock Jones (talk) 06:58, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Stade Olympique Yves-du-Manoir →  – French typography is "Stade olympique", not Stade Olympique. Arorae (talk) 21:58, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:34, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 08:27, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The stadium in Montpellier gets about a dozen clicks per day, as opposed to 200+ for this one.  A hatnote to GGL Stadium would take care of any ambiguity. 162 etc. (talk) 21:51, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 August 2021
Talk:Eddie Jefferson

message: I read on the back of an actual album jacket of one of his earlier works, that he was killed behind that club while trying to break up an argument between two men. Apparently the two men were fiercely arguing about some issue or another, and Mr. jefferson stepped in and said "Brothers, Brothers, we don't need all of this," and before he could finish his statement, one of the men pulled out a gun and shot him in the head. He staggered a few feet and fell and by the time anyone was called he was pronounced dead at the scene.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Edenrage (talk • contribs) 20:28, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Adipoyl chloride

message: adipoyl chloride can be made by reacting adipic acid with thionyl chloride, also producing sulfurous acid. 
HOCO(CH2)4COOH + SOCl2 → ClCO(CH2)4COCl + H2SO3  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaromthenut (talk • contribs) 20:26, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  creation
Talk:Peyrepertuse

message: ...but was handed over to French forces without a battle in 1240... and now: "Because of this the castle was abannoned and unlike many other castles in the region was never subjected to siege, instead it was handed over to the french government in 1240." is this a joke? again: Siege from 13.Nov.1240 till 16.Nov.1240 - than Surrender. Chief of the french Troups: Jean de Beaumont -- Hartmann Schedel (talk) 11:33, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Top-down perspective

message: Ok, so out of all the games that have ever use this method, some how Grand Thief Auto was the only one anyone could think of using?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lockgar (talk • contribs) 00:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's much bigger problems with this article, e.g. that it's a stub without a single reference. --Allefant 09:37, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Aluminium phosphate

message: Aluminum phosphate is not normally used pure in baking. In baking powders it is found as sodium aluminum phosphate or some other compound similarly combined. --Cheminterest (talk) 22:20, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  removed this, the compound  actually used is sodium aluminium phosphate. I also cleaned out a lot of unsubstantiated and unrefereced material. This article still needs more work.  Axiosaurus (talk) 12:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage in cooking 

message: Added material on ALPO's and properties of berlinite. Referenced some material where I could find one and restructured to take account of the expansion of the article
Axiosaurus (talk) 16:28, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite Feb 2013
Talk:Cumberland Falls State Resort Park

message: The moonbow page says that there are more than 2 places that one can see a moonbow. Which is right? No one sites sources. Mrendo 14:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have, in fact, cited a source in this article that says Cumberland Falls and Victoria Falls are the only two places where a moonbow can be seen. Acdixon 15:18, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The park webpage is hardly a reliable source for exclusivity. It may be true that it's the only place where moonbows are *frequently* seen, but there's plenty of evidence for sightings elsewhere (see the external links in Moonbow). I've reworded the claim in the article. -- Elphion (talk) 07:18, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A moonbow can also bee seen at Yosimete National Park and is documented. --Mari 16:15, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moonbow 
Talk:Baddeleyite

message: This article was expanded by alravilla for the University of Houston course GEOL 3370 Introduction to Mineralogy, Prof. Jonathan Snow, Instructor. Alravilla (talk) 12:00, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded by 
Talk:Sunshine Plaza

message: I've addressed the concerns that was listed on the recent prod for the article, had referenced the articles, and had included its recent ownership wrangles between Lend Lease and the Westfield group. --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 14:12, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Addressed notability concerns

message: The archives are using the same title as each other and do not match the archives' titles. Jordf32123 (talk) 07:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix citations
Talk:Barium sulfide

message: About the article barium sulfide there exist a problem about the melting point value.
Through the many pages availabe in different languages about this issue, it is presented different values.
I just want to help with this probable mistake.
201.18.21.131 (talk) 17:41, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barium sulfide melting point 

message: If anyone has time to find the sources, ingesting barium sulfide can be highly toxic - creating profound hypokalemia.  Also it is used for hair removal/softening as a shaving powder MartinezMD (talk) 21:47, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human use/exposure
Talk:Barium titanate

message: What the hell do those "risk and safety phases" mean? 76.111.88.167 03:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hans Meissner ("Demonstration of Displacement Current," American Journal of PhysicsVolume 32, Issue 12 [December 1964], pp. 916) says the dielectric constant is 2800. This value should be included in the article. I imagine it's known with more precision now. JKeck (talk) 18:31, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

text: Thanks, off course, correcting. Materialscientist (talk) 00:16, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Ref 11 appears to be on the standard Fe-doped LN, not barium titanate. Not aware of any use of this latter material in similar applications Wikibearwithme (talk) 21:43, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: More citation problems
Talk:Twitch gameplay

message: The grammar in this article is hilariously bad.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.135.84.126 (talk) 18:04, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The entire article probably needs a rewrite, but I do not have the necessary expertise or the time to do the research.  Feel free to contribute if you can!  Even small improvements eventually add up. Augurar (talk) 19:43, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar

message: I've read this article and to me it sounds as if it were a newspaper article or editorial. Aside from the bad grammar and many typos, I'm afraid this article might need to be rewritten entirely. Right now I'm trying to fix the grammar and style as best as I can. I've also addded the  template. Astatine211Talk 18:35, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I removed all the 2nd-person pronouns, so the inappropriate person template can probably be removed. But I agree that this article might need a full rewrite.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.0.216 (talk) 05:57, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Might need to be rewritten... 

message: This article seems bias against twitch gameplay. It doesn't mention that reflexively using the best commands/ buttons and joystick/ analog stick/ or mouse motions are a part of skill. It also doesn't mention fighting games; the Super Smash Bros. series has a large amount of twitch gameplay, yet requires much of skill to be good at.
The part about the future of twitch gameplay seemed exceptionally biased. sdmitch16 (talk) 02:44, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  I added some information on fighting games in the section "Twitch in other Genres."  Perhaps there should be a section on criticism and views on twitch gameplay? --Tumthe3 (talk) 00:42, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: Someone just rewrite the whole "Twitch in Shooters" deal, or delete it completely. Here's the roundup of it. First it attempts to set "strategy" and "twitch" as two subcategories of a higher category. It makes it as though they directly outweigh each other, which doesn't make sense. Next it suddenly confuses twitch gameplay to panicking. Twitch merely means you can turn and move really fast, in twitchy motions. It makes it out to seem that twitching is when you freak out when someone sneaks up on you and you pull out the wrong weapon and start shooting around randomly. Lastly it blatantly says that people who play twitch shooters have no skill or life, in a long drawn out manner.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.38.11.51 (talk • contribs) 07:12, 5 June 2012‎ (UTC)
::Thoroughly agreed, this section contains not a single reference and is written in laughably biased tone and rhetoric. I second deleting it entirely. 177.62.244.84 (talk) 18:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horribly Biased Section
Talk:Behenic acid

message: The reference Nilo B. Cater and Margo A. Denke: "Behenic acid is a cholesterol-raising saturated fatty acid in humans" Am J Clin Nutr 2001 73 41-44 is cited to support the contention that behenic acid is a cholesterol-raising saturated fatty acid in humans.  The reference is a paper covering a study of seven adult male humans.  The cholesterol-raising conclusion was based on comparisons of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol produced by a high-behanate diet compared to a high-oleate diet.
For total cholesterol, the high-behenate result was 5.87±0.8 mmol/L, the high oleate result was 5.12±0.5 mmol/L, according to Table 3, p. 43.  The difference, 0.75±0.94 is claimed to be significant at the 98.33% level, according to the Student's t test (subsection "Statistical analysis, also on page 43.)  For seven measurements, the t value (average / standard deviation of average) must be no less than 2.365 to be significant at the 97.5% level, and no less than 2.998 to be significant at the  99% level.  The standard deviation of the average is the standard deviation divided by the square root of the number of subjects (seven in this case).  Thus, for the claimed level of significance, 0.75 divided by 0.356 (= 2.106) must be greater than 2.365.  It is not.
For LDL cholesterol, the published results were 4.40±0.8 and 3.70±0.6, yielding an average difference of 0.70, a standard deviation of the average difference of 0.380, and a t value of 1.84, which still is not greater than 2.365.
According to the data in the referenced paper, the significance claimed in the referenced paper based on the data is not there.  Consequently, I have tagged the reference as unreliable.   Jay L09 (talk) 14:05, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cholesterol?
Talk:Benzethonium chloride

message: "Independent testing shows that benzethonium chloride is highly effective against such pathogens as" - These claims should be verified with a citation, preferably to the aforementioned independent tests.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prosthetic Head (talk • contribs) 14:38, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  unreferenced claims 

message: Anybody have any idea why a Wikipedia search for the phrase "pony mine" should turn up this article? rowley (talk) 20:01, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Pony Mine"? 

message: 2600:8801:B04:2000:7D0F:176C:EBD5:1EC4 (talk) 22:05, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it effective against coronavirus?
Talk:Gawsworth Old Hall

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded.
#It should make use of sections.
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
 DDStretch  (talk) 09:33, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 16:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment Report
Talk:Monument historique

message: Some hopefully minor changes. Prosper Mérimée now spelled correctly and linked. He was appointed inspector-general of historical monuments: this sounds like a civil service post rather than ministerial, so he should not really be described as the first Minister of Culture (if my uderstanding is correct). The sentence describing the Auberge Ravoux was confusing; hopefully now better.
Emeraude 17:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: :Category: has been nominated for . You are encouraged to join the discussion  on the Categories for discussion page. Eric talk 14:08, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  CfD nomination of [[:Category:{{ucfirst:Monuments historiques of Indre-et-Loire}}]] 
Talk:Great Cross of Hendaye

message: The book is a great journey through history.
The riddle it solves points to September 22nd, 2002 NOT the 2012 date.
I'm surprised the author doesn't do anything about it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.185.218.240 (talk) 19:47, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is this still in the present tense 4 years later?
"Many, including devotees of Nostradamus, the Bible Code, and especially the 2012 phenomenon, believe that a great comet will pass by, or into, the earth in the year 2012 and interpret the Cross of Hendaye as another reminder that 2012 is the end."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.109.40.58 (talk) 07:13, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's in the "historical present", the tense for according information from texts; things like films, tv shows, novels, news bulletins and scholarly texts. It's not aligned with something coming true or not. Manytexts (talk) 02:46, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why? 

message: Restored article after it was completely gutted to "nub" class so it's a "C" now. May have chosen a better revert but this will do in the face of willful vandalism. Manytexts (talk) 05:19, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nub class changed to C 

message: Why does this article have zero statements about the history and construction of the cross? Bhami (talk) 03:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History and construction?
Talk:RuneSlayers

message: Hello, Oknazevad. In response to this edit, which you made with the edit summary "internet is not capitalized", I have to point out that "Internet" is, in fact, capitalized. See the article Internet, which consistently spells "Internet" with a capital "I". I was unable to find anything in WP:MOS supporting your view. Freeknowledgecreator (talk) 00:39, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see the most recent discussion of it here, and also note the guides referenced in that discussion. Long and short of it, "internet" is not usually capitalized anymore. oknazevad (talk) 21:20, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Computing. It spells "Internet" with a capital "I". Regardless of the discussion you linked to above, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Capital letters says nothing about the issue at all. Freeknowledgecreator (talk) 22:43, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of Internet
Talk:Tabley House

message: #The stub article needs to be expanded.
#It should make use of sections.
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
Peter I. Vardy 14:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 14:05, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment Report

message: Extraction of brine leading to the collapse of a house is a story that needs briefly to be told. Otherwise it's too strange and mysterious.--Wetman (talk) 18:21, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  extraction of brine
Talk:Tatton Park

message: #The article needs to be expanded.
#It should continue make use of sections.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
Peter I. Vardy 14:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 