lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Combust (astrological aspect)

message: With all due respect to those interested in astrology or astronomy, this article is about a highly technical, arcane and estoric subject. I am strongly in favor of merging it into Heliacal rising, which is much more understandable, or else deleting this article entirely. - mbeychok 21:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Combust is not the same as heliacal rising -- heliacal rising deals with a planet's position on the horizon (more specifically a rising planet's/star's position on the eastern horizon), while combust deals with a planet's position in close conjunction with the Sun (irregardless of the horizon). I hope this clears things up for you. --172.162.216.137 13:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge into [[Heliacal rising]] 

message: I propose that Cazimi_(astrological_aspect) be merged into Combust_(astrological_aspect). Both topics are closely related and after merging the other long term issues with both articles can be solved. MakeSense64 (talk) 07:39, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Cazimi is a phase within combustion so its discussion can be merged within the discussion of combustion yes.Clooneymark (talk) 13:25, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal 

message: Have added a search box. Need more sources. MakeSense64 (talk) 08:16, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More improvement needed
Talk:9/11 truth movement

message: You can't talk about 9-11 Truth without discussing WTC7. 50.46.196.237 (talk) 19:23, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You can't talk about WTC7 here at all. This page is for discussion pertaining to the article's improvement and not the subject of the article itself.  SN54129 19:33, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTC 7?
Talk:Battle of Uhud

message: it is seen that in multiple pages it is written as prophet Mohammed plundered the caravans of quraish which is absolutely true.he strongly forbid plundering, robbing . enemy caravans were checked as a means of defense but robbing or plundering was strictly forbidden people believe Wikipedia blindly ,they don't check who edited it, I also never used to until I saw this absolute false story I request Wikipedia to allow editing of topics only by scholars of the topic. If you are not sure of this read islamic history from credible sources and kindly avoid misleading others from a religion that teaches of the smallest to biggest mistakes and forbids them 142.247.225.221 (talk) 12:33, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Restricting editing on a religious topic to members of thar religion, to ensure that the coverage is biased towards their view, would be 100% contrary tobthe whole purpose of Wikipedia. JBW (talk) 10:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong content
Talk:Eisack

message: Please move it to Talk:Eisack. The talk page is stuck at Talk:Isarco probably because of Talk:Isarco#Move request April 2007 above. The result was then 5.5-1 for Eisack and 2.5-1 against Isarco. However, the page was soon after moved again by two users, as if the discussion did not take place (
    ). PS: Should we inform all users in the past interested in the debate per template of the request or what do WP regulations say? Gun Powder Ma (talk) 14:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:SpaceShipOne flight 11P

message: "Roll oscillation" on landing caused the gear to collapse?  Watch the video on the DVD. Its "sink rate," not "roll oscillation."  The landing gear wasn't built to handle that kind of vertical speed.  I'll defer to the folks at Scaled as to whether it was sink rate or roll, but it sure looked looks like sink rate to me. NIN 20:59, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gear Collapse
Talk:Endometrium

message: I changed "21-13 days" to "12-13 days" since I assumed it was a typo. / Habj 21:25, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I partly rewrote the center section and introduced the terms proliferative, secretory, and menstrual endometrium, as these are important to understand the process. I removed part of the discussion about cycle length in dogs and horses as that belongs to the estrous cycle and is not germane to the endometrium itself. The discussion about the horse cycle was transferred to the estrous cycle. Ekem 22:21, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  The introduction of those terms are great but I think they should be explained a little more. // Habj 18:00, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: That's a great picture, and indeed I can see that the authors may have spent great efforts in order to produce it and gracefully illustrate us about how Mother Nature really works. But we common pet lovers might find it somewhat displeasant to watch. I myself had a reaction of shock when I first opened the page: for a brief moment I thought it was an human embryo! (and I know you doctors keep those kind of pictures!) In a second I looked desperately for the caption and I was informed it was from a cat. I breathed with relief and thanked the unknown medical editor for the consideration, but the following second I started to remember my long-ago gone Ralf pet cat. Would it be too much to ask if, for a chance, don't you have some picture from a cow or pork or some other mammal that we are more accustomed to slice and eat? Believe me, many people turn to Wikipedia exactly because their mood isn't like they would want to attend medical school, with all its corpse dissections and the like. Thank you and please forgive our sensitiveness! Aldo L (talk) 21:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: Are the terms "endometrium" and "endometrial lining" synonymous? This needs to be clarified. If they're different, then the term "endometrial lining" needs to be defined. ThreeOfCups (talk) 01:17, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: They are synonymous, judging by what I have read and studied over the years, as is "uterine lining." Flyer22 (talk) 16:19, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Endometrium vs, endometrial lining 

message: Endometrium 37.111.134.31 (talk) 04:28, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biology
Talk:Education technology

message: I am going to merge this page with Educational technology.
I am going to do this immediately, rather than post a merge box, because:
*Educational technology has been re-written and is more developed
*Educational technology has many pages link to it, this page has none
*This page has not been significantly edited since original creation
I am not going to merge any of the existing material on this page, because:
*The text is not relevant to the Educational technology page. It is relevant to the Technology Integration page, but will not add anything to that page
Alan Pascoe 21:25, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Educational technology
Talk:Gothic metal/Archive 1

message: To clear it up, as most people probaly dont know what the two are. Romanticide is the tale of romantic lore that ends in death of one or both partners, (Romeo and Juliet, Beauty and the Beast). Fantacide is the Fantasy Based Romance that ends in tragedy, (Snow Snow White, Her Rapunzel). Most bands write their own storys in this manner. The words are actuall words, but i also have all the spelling abilitys of a learning impaired mosquito. - Ley Shade ~~Leyasu
: Thanks for doing that.  I was looking for articles on those, and they weren't there, so I substituted Romanticism and Fantasy for the time being.  Thanks for clearing that up.  --Idont Havaname 02:02, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romanticide And Fantacide 

message: In the interest of neutral point of view, it would probably be best if we did not include a list of bands that are not gothic metal.  Other genres' articles do not do this, and if this article did, then that would set off a flurry of controversy as bad as "Is (band name) punk rock or just pop punk?", a topic that's been beaten to death on many forums.  We could probably split the list of gothic metal bands into its own article at List of gothic metal bands if necessary (it isn't long enough to justify doing that yet), but if the list of "not gothic metal" bands were made into its own article, it would be deleted without a doubt.  If somebody wants to know if a specific band is (or isn't) gothic metal, then the talk page is always open, and of course it's already been used for the ugly Evanescence case. --Idont Havaname 02:02, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The list of bands that are not gothic metal
Talk:7 mm caliber

message: I added a section for references. I think it helps when people have confusion or discrepancy about the actual dimensions. Arthurrh 21:16, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: This article was broken into several sections to make it easier to find the cartridge people are looking for. The sections are named based on actual measurements, not on terms used in naming, marketing, etc. Please be sure to be factual when changing such section titles. Arthurrh 20:24, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size sections 

message: Why is the 6.8 SPC cartridge under the 7mm page? Shouldn't it be on the 6mm page?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dslayer202 (talk • contribs) 05:28, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  6.8mm SPC 

message: Should 7mm IHMSA be added?  It is probably not notable enough to have an article, but may be a listing here.--Surv1v4l1st ▌Talk|Contribs▌ 18:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  7mm IHMSA 

message: The redirect 7.92 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:28, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:7.92]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Dze

message: Main article states: 'In practice, Ѕ is rarely used in Macedonian'. This is fuzzy. It can be stated that there are no much words which use the letter Ѕ, or even better not to mention anything at all. If badly needed, someone should provide data on frequency of usage.
Also, mentioning its absence from the Macedonian Constitution adds fuzziness. Someone could get an impression that the letter Ѕ was forgotten or neglected. The truth is that Macedonian Constitution does not contain words ѕвезда(star), ѕид (wall) nor any words which contain letter Ѕ. Is there a requirement for a constitution to contain all letters of the national language? I suggest removing this statement from the main article.Mice mice (talk) 08:48, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: When reading (or trying to read) a Macedonian novel, it wasn't until page 10 or so that I first encountered that letter (yes, when somebody had to mention a wall or a star or a bell). So yes, while it is a bona fide letter used in the standard spelling of a few important words, the relative frequency of this letter in an "average" Macedonian text is very low (maybe 0.1  occurrence per page) - probably much lower than the frequency of any English or German letter in the English or German text, for example. The dzhe (Џ) is quite rare too, but seemingly not as rare, because it occurs in a fairly productive suffix.  -- Vmenkov (talk) 05:20, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage of letter Ѕ in Macedonian language 

message: An unregistered editor added the alternate name Reversed Script Ge in the lede, with the edit summary "Fixed typo" which is fishy enough, and then changed Dze to Reversed Script Ge in the Unicode names – which we, being not the Unicode Consortium, don't get to do.  I now revert. —Tamfang (talk) 21:06, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversed Script Ge
Talk:Transport in Milan

message: What color is line M4?? 66.32.197.148 22:05, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Nazarene Bible College

message: In the providence of God, Colorado Springs was selected as the site. - I'm not sure I understand this, but I'm thinking it's basically saying that the selection of Colorado Springs as the site was a "good thing." I have no problem with this statement personally, but it does seem like a POV. Am I wrong about the meaning of the sentence? I didn't change it myself because I'm unsure that my interpretation is correct. --Bltpdx 06:46, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV?
Talk:Primula vulgaris

message: I found in the http://www.catalogueoflife.org/ (which I guess is the most reliable index of species on the internet) that Primula vulgaris Huds. is now considered a synonym of Primula acaulis L.
http://www.catalogueoflife.org/col/details/species/id/0b73f4a5df80dc46ca6947dc70f44e6a/synonym/bc5cfc72ee16a13124eccffc692e6182  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Binlou (talk • contribs) 07:14, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing vulgaris to acaulis
Talk:Crazy English

message: Cleaned up the wording and removed most of the NPOV statements.  Added a link that seems to be the main website for this subject (not sure if it is the official homepage for this method or not).  More research needs to be done to verify the information in this article.   
The wording could still use a little more cleaning up and more information should be added.  
-- John Wyandson 22:34, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial Cleanup

message: Found a really good article about this topic  -- John Wyandson 22:43, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Revamp

message: Richard Lederer is the author of the book Crazy English: The Ultimate Joy Ride Through Our Language (copyright 1989).   -- Wavelength 15:19, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A book titled "Crazy English" 

message: wrote this comment on the page: 
:But there is a question: does this method work to help the student to "communicate" with the set of words memorised simply by shouting aloud at the wind? In Chinese public schools the "communicative approach" to foreign language acquisition is practically ignored,and LI Yang's method does not work in the long run.
I'm not exactly sure what the editor meant, or whether it was intended to be part of the article, but it would need a source to be in the article (perhaps in a criticism section) and avoid being original research. Rigadoun  (talk) 21:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment removed from article 

message: Here is Official Page and it seems that the website is still active. I think it would be useful for clean up and add new contents. Mariogoods (talk) 04:28, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crazy English's official website
Talk:Missouri Route 165

message: There are several problems by trying to merge everything together and doing so poorly. The notability of the county road segment isn't firmly established, so honestly it should be ignored other than the mention in the history. However, if the two topics are going to be merged, we need to do so with some intelligence. Some points:
#The infobox is a mess.
##The title of the article is "Missouri Route 165". Give that topic priority in the infobox. County Road 165 can get its own smaller infobox in the body of the article. That's one of the reasons why we have . (See M-553 (Michigan highway) for an example.)
##The length is misleading, and frankly, inaccurate. Google Maps does not report to three decimal places, yet it's the source for "18.013 mi". The length note helps clarify, but each designation should have its own infobox, removing any need for written clarification.
##Do the termini apply to Route 165 or CR 165? From the presentation of the infobox, I can't tell. Apparently they're the termini of both designations since both are jointly given in the name location of the infobox.
##Is CR 165 really a part of the Missouri State Highway System? I don't think so, but the infobox implies otherwise.
#The lead is also not helpful.
##Is the name just "County Road 165" or is it "Taney County Road 165"? Why is the abbreviation missing?
##No mention of the history of CR 165 as a former segment of Route 165. For that matter, no mention of any history?
#The route description has some issues, but it's the least bad part. It would help the merger situation to break that section into three paragraphs: CR 165, Route 165/CR 165, CR 165 again.
#The history is just incomplete. Some dates would help, but again this is the least bad part.
#The RJL is another mess.
## You can't add numbers from one source with a precision of only a single decimal place (Google Maps) to numbers from another source with a precision of three decimal places (MoDOT) and get three decimals. You always have to round to the least precise figure. The solution is to respect the jurisdictional change and reset the mileposts. So   and . Then you can use MoDOT's more precise figures. At the other end, do the reverse,   and 
##"Begins" and "ends" aren't directions. Remember, readers can read the column bottom-to-top to get the reverse direction of the roadway. Please use actual cardinal directions.
##Use  so that "Route 165" isn't linked. When you link back to the same article, MediaWiki bolds the text. In this case, that bold "Route 165" violates the MOS.
##Also, put the Route 165 into the standard cells for the junction where it has its termini.
Merging the two related topics can be done, but they shouldn't be done as currently presented. The alternatives are separate articles, or giving CR 165 its own section at the bottom or the article, as M-554 has at the bottom of the M-553 article. Imzadi 1979 →  22:21, May 8, 2020 (UTC)</small>
:I've restored some changes to being addressing these issues. More work needs to be done in copyediting the  prose further. Imzadi 1979 →  04:36, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problematic merger of related topics
Talk:Missouri Route 249

message: Here's a PDF map of the US71/171 and MO 249 interchange. http://www.modot.mo.gov/southwest/route249/documents/Linemap249.pdf  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Intelati (talk • contribs) 20:15, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: "The 6.2-mile stretch was built to interstate standards from Interstate 44, southeast of Joplin, to Missouri Highway 171 at Carterville."  The Joplin Globe.  http://www.joplinglobe.com/joplin_metro/x212157663/Missouri-Highway-249-opens-to-traffic?start:int=15 --Intelati (talk) 21:46, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: done :)--Intelati (talk) 23:48, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length 
Talk:Continental 1

message: I wikified the article created by 24.141.157.246 since the initiative does have its website. However, it seems very vague and not really serious. This is the first time I've ever heard of such a thing myself. Did anyone else come across it, or is it yet another of these local chamber of commerce-powered initiatives? --qviri 22:47, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  notable? wikipedia-worthy?
Talk:The Wars

message: Everything from Plot Summary downwards reads like a school book report. This includes use of informal language (predominantly in the plot summary) and original research (unreferenced discussion of symbolism). There is a complete lack of references to the text, but I am not sure if this is expected in articles on books.
The entire article from Plot Summary downwards needs to be rewritten for style and significant chunks (namely everything on symbolism) should probably be removed entirely. With the amount of time that the content has been in the article, it is difficult for me to determine if any of it is plagiarized, but it seems likely that large sections of text that ignore the manual of style would be lifted from somewhere.
I would like to have a more experienced editor take a look at the issues present. 70.72.198.177 (talk) 05:29, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style Issues 

message: This book is banned in many schools in Ontario. Why is this not mentioned on the page? This was huge news, so huge that it was even addressed in the world famous Banned Books Calendar  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.67.131.193 (talk) 11:41, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banned in Canada
Talk:Missouri Route 370

message: Is there dispute over whether this freeway is constructed to Interstate standards?  The last I heard was that the dispute was over what to call it.  MoDOT wants I-370 and AASHTO wants I-870.  On another note, this article stills needs some work done on it.  For starters I can't see the highway on the picture as the article suggestions.  It's also poorly worded in places.  --AcuteThinker 21:21, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interstate Standards? 

message: It should also be mentioned that from I-270 going westbound, the exit to I-370 is listed as Alternative Route to Kansas City and also from I-70 going eastbound, I-370 is signed as part of St Louis Area bypass to IL. Jon 14:52, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate to [[I-70]] 

message: Can a future section be added, even if the final designation is not currently known? As long as the information is properly sourced, then it can be added.  Allen (talk) 02:26, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future section
Talk:Missouri Route 465

message: I planned on repurposing the page to talk about the Highroad itself, rather than any specific route now that MO 465 has not existed for four years now. I've reverted my own edit, which added a bit of history, changed tenses, and removed mentions of Route 465 because the name of this article cannot be changed to "Ozark Mountain Highroad". The redirect under that name currently goes to the Route 76 page. Because the highroad is a component of Route 76, it may be simpler to incorporate some of the information on this article into the Route 76 page and delete this page entirely. OzarkMan417 (talk) 20:20, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page moving forward
Talk:Harry Calvert

message: Clearly needs new title. Based on this and , maybe Harry Calvert, 1st Baronet General. 24.17.48.241 23:04, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
:Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
Therefore this articles name should be changed.--Ginggangsgoolies 20:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming