lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Segodnya

message: Even though in Russian Сегодня is pronounced as Segodnya, I believe that we should keep the former name, Segodnya instead of the current Sevodnya, which was added not a while ago. If in Russian it is written with a g, then why not transliterate it with a g? Or are we doing this so non-Russian speaking users may pronounce it correctly..? Any thoughts? —dima/s-ko/ 22:10, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you meant to say, "in Russian Сегодня is pronounced as Sevodnya...". Seeing that the article is currently called Segodnya, I would infer that it has suffered yet another move without discussion here. The purpose of transliteration is to preserve pronunciation, not an individual letter of the alphabet. Unless this newspaper calls itself Segodnya in English, it is absolutely wrong for us to do so. Peter Chastain [¡hablá!] 16:52, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Segodnya or Sevodnya

message: it looks like someone has already discussed this - Would it be worth moving this page over to Sevodnya? the name is spelled like "segodnya" in russian but pronounced like "sevodnya", and not everyone can read ipa so i think this should be moved over Yvzcvtp (talk) 23:48, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Talk:South Ferry station (IRT elevated)

message: I've prepared a hidden infobox for this article. The only trouble I'm having is separating all four lines. Take a look at what I've got so far below, and tell me how I can fix this. ----DanTD (talk) 13:31, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried it with using the service_custom field. What do you think? Acps110 (talk) 21:32, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There seems to be more of a gap between the Second Avenue & Third Avenue wikilinks, but it'll do. ----DanTD (talk) 00:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed that. The problem I have here is the distorted image caused by the infobox stretching it from 275px to 300px. -Secondarywaltz (talk) 21:38, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reduced the picture to 275px. Tinlinkin (talk) 04:59, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox available 

message: I added a note on the original 1877-79 station and got the opening month of the big terminal (March 1879).  The latter is based on a N Y Times story 2/16/1879 predicting opening in March; there is no followup story reporting the opening, so  I don't have the date.  Details of the old station are from many news sources; see my http://www.columbia.edu/~brennan/beach/chapter15.html (but I think I can't cite my own web page).   JoeBrennan (talk) 18:10, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem, Joe. The closer we get to straightening these things out, the happier I am. ----DanTD (talk) 19:55, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates
Talk:Warrior Kings

message: This article needs a Gameplay section. SharkD 03:06, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm playing through the game now (having just purchased it for 97p :> so will add a section soon (hopefully backing it up with a Critical reaction section) Marasmusine 06:41, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gameplay
Talk:Franklin P. Adams

message: ; Description : The focus of the project would be articles relating to the Algonquin Round Table, including its members and their literary works. 
; Interested Wikipedians (please add your name)
# Otto4711 17:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Algonquin Round Table proposal at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals]], please vote!
Talk:Attention span/Short Attention Span

message: I enjoy the band short attention span and because their name and musical content pertains to not only the subject but the subjects deeper meaning, I feel its appropriate to mention them.  Especially since they are part of the short attention span generation. If wikipedia and or you the user disagree I understand and will have them removed from the article, as I do not want to hurt the integrity of wikipedia.
::It's good to have an article about short attention span (the condition) and about short attention span (the band).  But it's not good to have one article about both.  It's a real encyclopedia: one subject, one article.  You can write an article about each, but you'd probably run into two problems.  For the former (the condition), you'd have to thoroughly make references to reputable sources. The wikipedia science community really doesn't mess around. Also I think an attention span article already exists. For the latter (the band), you'd probably have a difficult establishing notability.  There's like a million bands, what makes SAS notable?   If you think you can do both, you should definitely give it a shot.  You'll find plenty of people willing to help. -Taco325i 22:35, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You could start a new article entitled "Short Attention Span (band)".  But i'll tell ya now, it'll probably get speedy-deleted for lack of notability.  If you want to give it a decent chance of survival, you should include plenty of references, such as newspaper articles and third party reviews. If you need help including references, let me know.  -Taco325i 17:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The safest way to go forward is to write such an article in your userspace first. I see that you were not logged in when you made the previous comment, but I assume you are . You can write an article about the band at User:Bleusboy/Short Attention Span (band). Be sure to read the manual of style and the music notability guidelines thoroughly before you do. It can save you a lot of time and effort, particularly if the band does not meet the notability guidelines. Aecis No running, shouting or piddling in the shallow end 01:01, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Rochester Grammar School

message: I think some students have been making "amusing" edits to this article. 94.195.49.119 (talk) 00:59, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

message: This is dull. It reads like a press release or prospectus. Can anybody add anything more interesting? More about the foundation, perhaps? --Cunningham 16:59, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dull 

message: Apart from obvious bias, especially in reference to the school's selection and performance, the article refers to RGS as "we", clearly not neutral.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.34.83.69 (talk) 10:29, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "We" 

message: I have removed the above from the notable pupils list as he was a) male and b) 39 when the school was founded.  JamieEF (talk) 17:36, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry Fielding Dickens 

message: Please note that she wrote this herself, therefore displaying obvious bias.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roar1008 (talk • contribs) 16:52, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Pupils - Emily Christian 

message: I'm sorry but does anybody know what the houses are named after other than Hildegard ( Hildegard of Bingen) and Fitzgerald ( Ella Fitzgerald)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mary1999snowman1 (talk • contribs) 07:53, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  RGS houses
Talk:WikiLeaks

message: Hello, i wanted to warn users with edit perm that in 2011–2015 section, the word "malware" is written as "mawlare". Rei Da Tecnologia (talk) 11:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've fixed it. Mindmatrix 13:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo. 

message: "In 2013, the organisation assisted Edward Snowden leave Hong Kong"
It should be
"In 2013, the organisation assisted Edward Snowden in leaving Hong Kong" 2601:647:6300:9590:58D:3732:6BDA:CD15 (talk) 02:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor typo
Talk:Electronic Music Studios

message: The links section lists the company's homepage here. But that webpage was last updated in 1998. In theory I could telephone them and find out what they are doing, their number is 01726 883 265, but that would be original research. I would have to phone them up, write about them on a website, and then link to that article in order for the information to be valid under Wikipedia's rules. -Ashley Pomeroy 22:25, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Still around?
Talk:Vitebsk (air base)

message: This air base is not exist now! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.57.182.142 (talk) 19:14, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This air base is not exist now! 
Talk:Kintail

message: The boundaries I gave (and some I didn't) - Glen Shiel, Strath Croe, [Bealach na Sroine,] Gleann Gaorsaic, [Gleann Gniomhaidh,] An Caorann Mor - are what I remember being given in the SMC Northwest Highlands guidebook. Unfortunately I don't have the book to hand at the moment, and can't find a satisfactory definition in any book currently on my shelf or online, so I'd be grateful if someone could check up on this. In particular I'm not sure whether A Ghlas-bheinn and/or Sgurr nan Ceathreamhnan should be included. --Blisco 22:28, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Boundaries

message: I believe the incorrect mountains have been given as the Five Sisters. From West to East they should be Sgùrr na Moraich, Sgùrr nan Saighead, Sgùrr Fhuaran, Sgùrr na Càrnach and Sgùrr na Ciste-Dhuibe. Sgùrr nan Spàinteach is hidden behind Sgùrr na Ciste-Dhuibe when viewed from Loch Duich, which is where the classic Five Sisters vista is from.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.50.118.230 (talk) 16:16, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong names
Talk:Societal attitudes towards abortion

message: Should this article article be renamed "Public opinion and abortion" to take into account its current scope, which exclusively discusses the results of public opinion polls, and not so much "societal attitudes?" -Severa  (!!!) 12:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename proposal

message: I just wondered at the selection of states in the Pew poll cited.
Why in the world did it not include a single European state, while including both Chile, Guatemala and Brazil?
Since there is, after all, still quite a lot of Christians in Europe, this does seem to warp the 'Christianity angle' a bit.
Also it is not a survey of Christians in general but only of Pentecostals, which certainly challenges the relevance of the poll in relation to the general question of 'Christian attitude'.
Mojowiha (talk) 14:56, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pew Poll: Relevance? 
Talk:A New Day in Old Sana'a

message: i saw this movie at the seattle arab film festival, and despite the obvious lack of funds it was a beautifully told romance, and consistent with arab custom, quite tragic...hopefully this will pave the way for more culturally rich films from yemen.  128.208.35.224 (talk) 01:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  first feature film from yemen 
Talk:X-Men (1993 video game)

message: What is the deal with all the characters being described as the best jumper? I can't tell if this is subtle vandalism or a serious point badly phrased. 94.196.221.253 (talk) 19:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jumping? 

message: There are two articles about this game with nearly identical info. Noclevername 09:00, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Rand formula

message: I don't think this article has a limited geographic scope because the Rand Formula is only supposed to be about Canada.  It is not pretending to represent the entire world of labour laws, only Canada's.  Martin-C (talk) 03:44, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Limited geographic scope

message: The Rand Formula has been implemented in a variety of legal contexts and although interpreted by its critics as binding businesses to violate the free choice of their employees, and as having a negative effect in that it limits individual choice on whether or not to pay union dues in a manner incompatible with market economies it has been generally well received. The positive reception of the Rand formula came mostly from unions and their allies with conservative Canadians voicing the most opposition . The rationale for the Rand formula being stated as “unions are service providers entitled to appropriate compensation for the services they provide” demonstrating that the Rand formula was viewed by the judiciary as a reasonable limit on personal economic freedom in a free market economy such as Canada's. The Formula was largely perceived by businesses and individuals in Canada as a compromise between the extremes of mandatory union membership and universal non-unionism.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bidmap (talk • contribs) 06:16, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plan to add section, Reception
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Zach111493

message: User:Zach111493
      run at Thu Jan 11 22:33:21 2007 GMT
Image:	1
Mainspace	29
Talk:	18
Template talk:	1
Template:	3
User talk:	16
User:	14
Wikipedia:	28
avg edits per article	4.40
earliest	05:24, 22 December 2006
number of unique articles	25
total	110
Editcount generated using Interiot's wannabe Kate's Tool. Nishkid64 22:34, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Zoo Tycoon: Dinosaur Digs

message: Some dick added Parasaurolophus to the list of dinos on the game. This is clearly vandalism but the article appears to be blocked to edits. Someone please help! I have the game and I never saw a Parasaurolophus on it!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.36.148.242 (talk) 06:49, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Help!
Talk:Zoo Tycoon: Marine Mania

message: There are meant to be 27 animals in total. I counted up 22 on the normal animals and I'm trying to figure out what doesn't belong there. 58.110.247.14 (talk) 11:13, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animals 

message: Any particular reason the article is written in the past tense. I mean, sure it's an old game but people still play it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.36.148.242 (talk) 05:28, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You're exactly right. Thank you for pointing this out. I wish I had noticed it sooner. ICYTIGER'SBLOOD 20:22, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Past tense
Talk:The Boss (Diana Ross album)

message: I'm sorry, but "It is often sited by fans as one of Diana's finest solo albums."??? Or "She received high kudos for how great she looked."??? And "[...]she opened her set with the title track to enthusiastic feedback from fans and critics alike."??? Those lines have been removed. For the pure statistical facts: sources needed (since they seem to be absent, and can't be found anywhere in this article). Robster1983 (talk) 16:37, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up needed

message: I'm changing the location of Sigma Sound from Philadelphia to NYC based on  which is a very in-depth article on the album's sessions being based on interviews with Valerie Simpson and other session personnel.--Cherrylimerickey (talk) 21:29, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Sigma Sound
Talk:Henrique Feist

message: story checks out... http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0270768/  A google search also reveals numerous hits.  he's also got an article over in portugese wikipedia.  I vote that we keep.  But with some serious clean up. The bold letters are hurting my eyes. -Taco325i 22:41, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stewart Phillip

message: I have rewritten the article at Talk:Stewart Phillip/Temp. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 00:24, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewritten 

message: Other than his fight over the title of Mee Shee and the basic identification of him as a native poiltical leader, the bit from the Fraser Institute - presented by itself - is somewhat POv and has a tinge of slander to it.  Has he manned any barricades?  Run roadblocks hassling tourists?  Confronted Mounties?  The Fraser Institute are neoconservative militants in grey suits....curiously it's no secret that the Okanagan bands are among the most economically progressive, i.e. in business-dealing terms, of all BC's First Nations; I don't know enough about his career to talk about his accomplishments but it seesm to me that just providing a quote from a greasy slab of Fraser Institute neocon propaganda isn't all that good a thing.....it's like having on here something Rush Limbaugh said about Obama, and nothing else...Skookum1 (talk) 02:22, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Content somewhat POV...cites especially

message: Not sure how to fit this in, but this is the kind of thing that I'm sure gets the Fraser institute's back up about him, and it points to his legal and political savvy; not sure how to describe it in the article, but this and other things like it involving issues he's taken on certainly should be:
* Letter to Sheridan Scott, Commissioner of Competition, April 23, 2004.  See BC Legislature Raids, which needs updating huge but is connected to this same material issue....Skookum1 (talk) 02:22, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Letter of his to federal Competition Bureau over the BC Rail sale
Talk:Cornerstone Research

message: I created the Cornerstone Research page and did not intend it to be an advertisement for the firm.  I noticed that many of the company's competitors had brief but informative articles and attepted to add something similar for Cornerstone.  I did my best to avoid making normative statements about the firm, and feel I did a reasonably good job of doing so (for the most part, anyway).  
I would be happy to alter the page so that it more closely conforms to Wikipedia's standards, although I must ask for additional guidance before attempting that -- are there particular aspects of the article which make it seem like an advertisement?  I'd like to expand the article, but doubt that I will have the time to do so for several days; would the addition of more detail make it seem less like an advertisement?
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Benski (talk • contribs) 2007-01-11T23:53:28  (UTC)
:Please read WP:COMPANY for the relevant guidelines. I don't think this company meets it, but if you disagree, provide verifiable sources to back up the relevant notability claims per WP:COMPANY. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 23:00, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it has potential.  It seems to be a pretty big firm, even ranked by vault.com.  If some third-party references were listed, I think this article could work.  Benski, which competitors do you mean? -Taco325i 23:05, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All right, I'll remove the db tags for now, pending expansion of the article with sources. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 23:09, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Great -- thanks!  I will take a little time and try to provide better citations for the information in the article.  Taco325i, I was thinking of Analysis Group, LECG, and NERA, all three of which compete in the same industry.  NERA and LECG are larger (and LECG is public, I think), but Analysis Group is comparable in most ways.  The Cornerstone article is similar, although I tried to add a bit more information. Benski 23:12, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Viper (band)

message: The article currently states "initially highly influenced by Iron Maiden and the New Wave of British Heavy Metal, later developing a very particular sound." Unreferenced throughout, it shows distinct POV leanings, hence the {POV} tag.
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 14:37, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Andre Matos' article here on Wikipedia cites this demo on his discography. Can someone please check and see if this is true or not? If it is not true, please remove it from his page, but if it is true, please add his name here with the other musicians who recorded it. Thanks. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 00:35, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andre Matos 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:40, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 
Talk:NGC 6302

message: I don't have access to the Nature article where it speculates the first discovery of extrasolar carbonates:  "The detection of carbonates in NGC 6302 was made by Ciska Kempers, of the University of Amsterdam, and was published in 2002 in Nature, 415, 295." (nor am I willing to purchase access to the article to satisfy wikipedia's citation needed notations.
The findings and refutation are reported on here:  http://www.astrobio.net/exclusive/290/looking-for-carbonates-in-dry-places  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pyrroc (talk • contribs) 02:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referencing the citations needed notations 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:NGC 6302 Hubble 2009.full.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 22, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-02-22. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 00:23, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:NGC 6302 Hubble 2009.full.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: Hello all concerned! Perhaps some clarification is required, or I'm just being stupid... if we have observed a 'prominent northwest lobe', how could it be calculated to have formed 'around 1,900 years ago' if its distance from us is 3400 ± 500 light years?
Kind regards  Ianactually (talk) 21:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spacetime anomaly?
Talk:José Castillo (police officer)

message: While it only makes sense that Castillo would have been a member of the Union Militar Republicana Antifascista (UMRA), and there are many sites on the Web that say so, I can find nothing that rises to the level we would usually consider a reliable source. If someone has a solid citation on that, it would be good. - 23:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: UMRA
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/TSO1D

message: Image:	1
Mainspace	1733
Portal talk:	1
Portal:	3
Talk:	1180
Template talk:	3
Template:	49
User talk:	312
User:	88
Wikipedia talk:	49
Wikipedia:	691
avg edits per article	4.61
earliest	16:17, 22 May 2005
number of unique articles	891
total	4110
23:10, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Metanephrops boschmai

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Whpq (talk) 00:54, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: re-written. --Stemonitis (talk) 09:34, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Ryan Field (stadium)

message: The claims listed are identical to that of NU and like NU they have no sources. They've turned this article into feee advertising for a very controversial stadium rebuild proposal. 2601:246:C80:B60:DD9A:D646:71DF:CAE (talk) 17:13, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we take down the Reno stuff until it gets properly cited?