Talk:Superman & Batman: Generations

message: Needs more information. ~this message was added by Kidney Stone
:Brilliant deduction Mr. Kidney Stone. That's why it's a stub. Now, I will be adding some info sometime soon. Otherwise, feel free to do it yourself. Kusonaga 07:42, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, thanks, Mr, Stone. Maybe you can go around and tell us what pages need more info, and we can try to oblige you.  Seriously, though, I will see what I can do to help as well. Dyslexic agnostic 08:05, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Satisfied...? ;) Kusonaga 09:11, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Looking at the histories for Superman & Batman: Generations I and Superman & Batman: Generations II, it looks like a lot of information was lost when those two articles were merged into this one. Why is that? —scarecroe 15:19, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure, so I wrote all new summaries.  I might have gotten carried away.  Does anyone think that this entry needs individual infoboxes for the seperate series?Konczewski 16:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because I had written overtly detailed summaries, against wiki policy. Kusonaga 17:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Consolidation

message: Right before the article starts, it says that this article needs citations added, although I'm not arguing about the need for citations, all citations for this article would just refer to the series discussed and so the need for citations is basically meaningless.--Spaced35 (talk) 00:21, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In this case, citations would be backing up specific, individual statements with a footnote of the series, issue number and story that they are drawn from.  See the cites I made for the statment in the family tree section about how neither Talia nor Catwoman could be Bruce's unnamed wife. - Pennyforth (talk) 23:36, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the citation needed tag for a couple of reasons. (1) Nobody has pointed out any specific areas that need citations.  If someone has an concern about a statement or claim within the body of the article, please tag that with a  (2) If you mean that the summaries need citations, that makes no sense.  The implication is that the summaries are of specific issues, and that's spelled out in the body of the article.  Thanks. Konczewski (talk) 17:38, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations Needed? 

message: While the cover of Generations 1, issue #4 shows "2929" as the year of the 2nd story, the internal title is actually "2919: Nineteen Twenty Nine" rather than, "2929: Nineteen Twenty Nine". (I'm going by the original issues not the TPB). At first I thought the "1" was just a typographical error, which I assume the writers of this article did as well. However the events of the final issue of Generations 3 is dated 2925 multiple times throughout the issue, while the events clearly are supposed to take place after those of Generations 1 #4. I'm not sure if this is an unintentional error in Generations 1 or if it is one of Byrne's intentional continuity "errors". Regardless how should we deal with the situation? --Painocus (talk) 21:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  2929 vs 2919 

message: I am not sure exactly what this sentence was trying to convey; Could someone familiar with the creation of this content help clarify? 
Bruce Wayne Jr. is stopped by his mother from going out as Robin with Batman II, while Kara Kent tries on her Supergirl costume for the first time. She flies to Wayne Manor to see BJ, who is unhappy with his situation. Supergirl points out that he promised not be Robin with Batman; he didn't say anything about Supergirl.
Thanks KConWiki (talk) 04:21, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sentence clarification?