lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pierre Ballester

message: I've removed "Gondecourt Award 2004" from the book details because I don't see it on Google. --Mereda 17:05, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Strangely enough, I immediately found two sources using google. Socafan 17:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ... an article of a living person into the article of another living person is a bad idea unless one person is only notable as a minor player in the life of the other. This is not the case here, thus the articles should not be merged. Socafan 00:02, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  no worries. it only took 6 years to correct this error. since the USADA 2012 and UCI 2012 decisions, this guy is a journalistic historical figure, since most of those investigations built off of LA Confidentiel for their work. Decora (talk) 04:39, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging... 

message: The revert war is over text that is not good english, and is being inserted to push POV. I suspect that if the text were cleaned up to be succinct, clear and balanced it would be fine. Allow me to suggest that, if accurate and verifiable "Armstrong additionally requested that he be allowed to insert a denial into the book itself, in addition to (whatever he was rewarded from the newspaper). The courts rejected this request." Hipocrite - «Talk» 17:45, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for providing a third opinion and your suggestion of better text. No thanks for assuming bad faith. In how far do you see anything not neutral in the words, especially in contrast to what is written about the decisions in favour of Armstrong? Of course I am also interested in language errors as the sentence is taken from the source. The book and the newspaper lawsuits are different ones, so "in addition to" is misleading. Furthermore, Armstrong also lost on appeal, and the source says so. Socafan 22:13, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

text: "this request was rejected at the appellate level." sounds to me as if he had initially won but then lost on appeal. In fact he lost and then again on appeal. Could this be made clear please? Socafan 08:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Opinion
Talk:The Further Adventures of The Joker

message: ===Survey===
*Support CovenantD 17:06, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: *Support CovenantD 17:06, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: The short story should be part of the article on the book in which it appears. CovenantD 17:06, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Fantasy General

message: This is hardly an encyclopedia article, but is instead a review (and not a very well done one at that)Ashtur 17:17, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Squad leader is one of the most complex and intricate games ever made and is unplayable for most due to this level of simulated accuracy. Fantasy General is a simple games with very little complexity in either it's gameplay or the calculations that the computer makes to decide conflict outcomes. This "article" appears to be made by someone that has thrown together a couple of other peoples third hand experiences. I am an avid wargamer. My father works in wargames simulations for defence; and I can assure you that most of this article is fiction, regardless of it's subjectivity. -Mario
:Agreed, I removed the reference to SQLD.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  01:33, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Squad Leader?
Talk:Monochrome (Helmet album)

message: If anyone could tell me more about the image (drawing? painting?) on the album cover, I'd love to hear more about it. -DNordquist 17:13, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You might have better luck if you ask your question on the Helmet forum.—Lazytiger 21:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Trichy Sankaran

message: Just a pointer regarding Wikipedia: all our articles must be WP:NPOV--that is, espose a neutral point of view. That means that if you believe his music to be "astounding" or "supremely wonderful" (as many of us who have seen and heard him play believe) you can keep that in your heart but cannot state it in the article.  You can, however, with citations, present the various honors that he has won and the innovations he has made in music. The article should not read like a press publicity biography, as the new text does.
Finally, when editing the article, please work in details that are already there rather than simply deleting all the previous information and substituting the new text. His work in contemporary music and composition for non-Indian instruments is quite significant, as other mridangam players generally don't do this, and this actually deserves its own section rather than being removed again and again. Thank you for your contributions and I hope this has helped. Badagnani 17:37, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New text 

message: Can this quote by User:Arvindvenkat be explained:  (please do not change format for aesthetics sake, dont mess the page layout whoever is doing it !!!!!)?  We don't use these kind of HTML tags at Wikipedia because they are unnecessary. If they are not explained here, they will be removed again. Otherwise, the article is getting quite good and thank you immensely for your contributions. Badagnani 15:33, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  HTML break tags 

message: Article is a stub; desperately in need of third-party sources.  Argolin (talk) 00:36, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: class=Stub
Talk:Electron transfer

message: I like the specific examples, but perhaps it is a bit much for a page introducing the general topic of electron transfer?  Maybe it would be better to move these examples to the "inner-sphere" and "outer-sphere" pages?  I think those are the next ones that need developing.
:Good idea - I was wondering at the time.  I support the move.--Smokefoot 22:04, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I support that too, just leave a very simple section, with a 'main article' reference in it.  --Dirk Beetstra T C 22:17, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples

message: Nothing to say about ET in the gas phase? --Rainald62 (talk) 21:44, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Gas phase?
Talk:Voodoo People / Out of Space

message: Ug. Yes, Prodigy samples guitars and clearly set them apart from their contemporaries. Their music has changed drastically from the early cartoon rave sounds of Charly into the media dubbed 'Big Beat' sound of the UK. But come on, calling them a 'electronica/rave/rockband' is just weak. Let's throw some more adjectives in there. Gatesofawesome! 17:17, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre

message: This track has been remixed in the drum and bass style, so why can't the genre be classed as drum and bass? Someone keeps changing it, it's not irrelevant at all. 122.106.145.87 (talk) 07:15, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Voodoo People (Pendulum Remix)

message: Only the Musicvideo for the Pendulum Remix is mentioned here? The original had one as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:D93:A1A0:B889:536E:C95A:9D86 (talk) 17:44, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Musicvideo
Talk:Group A

message: Currently Opel is after Peugeot. Did someone forgot the alphabet ? 62.75.242.127 (talk) 15:00, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Alphabetically Ordered List

message: Does anybody have a source 25,000 base models are required for homologation. I cannot see in any FIA regulation. --PushingPace (talk) 12:54, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: From 1996, Group ST Super Touring cars (a Group A Formula, see Appendix J, Article 262) had the 25,000 requirement. This is the only example seen in the FIA yearbooks that are online up to 2001. Group ST were replaced in the noughties by Super 2000 which regs are still available and their requirement is 2500. I think somebody assumed this 25,000 applied to all Group A vehicles, and with few easy resources but Wikipedia this myth has spread. Regardless of if it ever was in Group A, it's not now. 2500 is correct. --Rally Wonk (talk) 22:31, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: 25,000?
Talk:List of programs broadcast by Game Show Network

message: Any word if NBC game shows are coming, like Scrabble, Sale of the Century, Classic Concentration, or Scattergories?
--24.228.70.72 05:00, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NBC shows on GSN 

message: Jeopardy! & Wheel Of Fortune Are Not On GSN At This Time. So Do Not Add It To The Current Shows List. GSN Will Not Add Anymore Shows To The Current Shows List.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.245.9.55 (talk) 20:43, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jeopardy! & Wheel Of Fortune On GSN? 

message: Should the GSN originals under Former Programming be specified as such? Hallpriest9 (Talk) 18:52, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no one's done it in the 18 months it's been proposed, I'll go ahead and sort them; I think if it's done with the current programs, it should be done with the former as well. --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 01:33, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former programming 

message: I think Original should be added to "Premiere/Finale Date" I'm afraid might cuse confusion (i.e. someone might think "oh GSN existed in 1983?) just suggestion Digifan23 (talk) 23:30, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Original Premiere"
Talk:List of programs broadcast by the History Channel

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved all as proposed, except for List of programs broadcast by History (TV channel), for which there is no consensus.   Mdaniels5757 (talk) 23:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 June 2020
Talk:Hans von Koessler

message: I guess it is obvious for many people. But because it confused me to see references to János Koessler and Hans Koessler, often in the biographies of the same person (e.g. Leo Weiner), I thought I'd point out explicitly that they are the same person. Some references:
* 
* 
* 
--Atavi (talk) 11:56, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name: Hans / János 
Talk:FMeXtra

message: This article is terribly biased and bashes HD Radio twice in the first paragraph.  This is not a debate club.--KJRehberg (talk) 01:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too Biased 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:26, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: Does this subject meet Wikipedia:Notability?  Supposedly existing since at least 2006, the system seems to have gotten so little use that it was re-named and nominally re-marketed as a non-specific "data" broadcasting technology.  From its own website, it looks like even its company doesn't know what to do with it: The website has only 3 pages (2 of which are contact names).  The prose on the website is pretty much devoid of any specifications, other than that it's something that sits at the edges of an FM radio signal.  It doesn't even explain what sort of data speeds are involved, except for the meaningless phrase "high-bandwidth", which was probably a ridiculous exaggeration even when it was written, let alone now, if the unsourced claims on this Wikipedia article are any indication: 40 kilobits/second on a stereo FM signal and 156 kb/s on a mono FM signal.  It doesn't explain whether widening your FM signal to ±0.99 MHz is even legal in most countries.  It doesn't explain why anyone would be buying this market for broadcasting data at dialup/ISDN speeds now.  Are even the early adopters actually using this system anymore?  Did it ever get enough coverage to meet WP:GNG? --Closeapple (talk) 10:49, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability from 2013 perspective
Talk:1987 National League Championship Series

message: What is an "obsolete triple", used to describe McGee's triple in game 3? It's been phrased that way since the very first version of the article. I don't know what could possibly make a triple obsolete. Wikipedia and Google both show this article as the only document to use the term in a baseball context. I'm removing the word "obsolete". --Booch 17:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obsolete Triple
Talk:West Long Beach

message: There are several facts in the acticle that need verification. 
# Westside Long Beach is a working class Long Beach neighborhood made up of mostly Latinos, Asians, and Blacks.
#*Census figures are needed. My guess is that Blacks and non-Latino Caucasians are probably about the same percentage for the Westside (But I could be wrong).
# The neighbor was once an affluent area populated mostly with Whites and Japenese. 
#* The neighborhood might have been middle-class, pre-WW II, but I don't think that the neighborhood has ever been affluent. Area has always been working class - oil field and fishing industry predominately prior to WWII.  
#Race riots at schools such as Cabrillo High School and Stephens Middle School occur frequently. incorrect.
#*Occasional possibly, but frequent?
BlankVerse 17:32, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Verification needed
Talk:The Phantom Limb

message: Doesn't he just go by Phantom Limb and not THE Phantom Limb? -th1rt3en 17:32, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yikes, good question. Anyone have the first season DVD and the first few second-season episodes handy? - DynSkeet *  Talk 18:19, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I checked Publick's LiveJournal and he reffered to him as "Phantom Limb" (as opposed to THE Monarch), so I went ahead and manually moved it. -th1rt3en 19:45, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We may need to create a disambiguation page to avoid accidental references from phantom limb syndrome due to case insensitivity. - DynSkeet *  Talk 20:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did that with a "For the article about the syndrome see phantom limb" on each page. -th1rt3en 01:37, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  name
Talk:List of programmes broadcast by TVNZ

message: I have removed the part saying the page is out of date and updated the page to the best of my knowledge. I have renamed the Current Shows section to a section of shows that screen throughout the year and the Hiatus section to a Seasonal show section this way the page shouldn't end up getting out of date so often with TVNZ frequently channging their schedule it is hard to keep up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.169.213.105 (talk) 11:06, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates to page

message: This is a list of shows that have been made by TVNZ to screen on their networks or shows made in NZ by a third party production company to be screened mainly on TVNZ networks. It is NOT a place to add overseas shows such as Friends, 24, Joey, Postman Pat and a few others found on here. If we were to add overseas shows to here the list would be massive and it is big enough as it is so really it just needs to be for shows that screen on TVNZ channels or have screened on TVNZ channels. Bhowden (talk) 08:26, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This is a list of NZ made shows
Talk:Allama Hassan Turabi

message: I just marked two sections with templates to indicated that they have no sources.  It may be that they need to be removed if no sources can be found.  The introductory text also has no citations.  I can't really delete that without messing up the whole article.  I will just put a "Expert Needed" template at the top.  I will also try to find a wiki-project it can be listed under.
--Lexandalf (talk) 18:00, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs More Sources

message: I placed this banner because sections of critical importance to this article are un-cited.  The information contained in the un-cited sections needs to be verified and cited.  The only other option that I can see is nominating this article for deletion.
--Lexandalf (talk) 18:20, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Totally agree, this article has no real references. All the provided references are dead links. FYI @Saqib Crosji (talk) 03:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: While the subject does not meet WP:POLITICIAN, but he received considerable press coverage following his death such as this, this and this. I still need to check further but he seems to borderline meets the WP:GNG. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 09:01, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, makes sense. Thank you. Crosji (talk) 16:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Expert Attention Needed

message: I think this article needs to be expanded on and cleaned up a bit.  It is a bit biased. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chipface (talk • contribs) 17:41, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality
Talk:Pelon Pelo Rico

message: Article requires wikification, a rewrite for context, categorizaton, and a GFDL image would be nice if possible.  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 17:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{tl|cleanup}} 

message: This product is not from Hershey, Penna. Varlaam (talk) 14:52, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mexican, not Pennsylvanian 

message: The Mexican official site uses Pelon. Surprisingly.
For trademark reasons? US market reasons? Varlaam (talk) 14:54, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Spelling changed to Pelon. Varlaam (talk) 14:56, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pelón or Pelon?
Talk:Timeline up to 2006 Gaza crisis

message: Do we have more detail as to the day to day happenings in the conflict? Enlil Ninlil 06:20, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sparce

message: I removed a piece that said hamas was responsible for the blast. It is debated, and what i thought was bad was one of the sources was jerusalem post. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerusalem_Post which even wikipedia says has a slant... that sort of thing shouldnt be tolerated.
:What slant? WP says "The paper was slightly liberal or left of centre" which if anything is all for criticizing Israel, but forget that even, it says that that was back in the day, and forget that too, the newspaper is simply reporting the findings, and forget that too, because there are multiple sources anyway. there are articles and opinions in that paper that criticize israel and other world policies, just like any other democratic society. --Shamir1 05:43, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beach Blast 

message: The content in this article belongs in 2006 Israel-Gaza conflict, and it is not long enough to require a spinout. Jalapenos do exist (talk) 00:30, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. ~Asarlaí 09:54, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Fortín de San Gerónimo

message: I would like to edit the name of the article, but I do not know how. The correct name of the fort is Gerónimo, with a "G". note by User:RAMPG
:What should the correct title be?  Fortín de San Gerónimo del Boquerón or is a shorter version more common? See El Cañuelo. — Eoghanacht talk 12:53, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. Thanks for replying. The common name would be "El San Gerónimo" but more properly, I think, would be "Fortín de San Gerónimo". The thing is I am not sure how to appropiately deal with the "double redirect" issue, if there is one. RAMPG 19:23, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved it from Fort San Jerónimo to Fortín de San Gerónimo and fixed the double redirects.  Click on my "user contributions" to see how I did the redirects. — Eoghanacht talk 13:03, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I sincerely appreciate your generous help. This small fort was essential in what would have been a drastic turn of events for Puerto Rico. And there is lots of more interesting facts to be added. RAMPG 17:01, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name?
Talk:Gordon Rugg

message: Article requires an MOS scrubbing, categorization, wikification, and a GFDL image if available.  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 17:53, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{tl|cleanup}} 

message: "Rugg failed to explain the topicality of the manuscript, the natural prefix frequencies, the two-level word natural entropies and most other peer reviewed statistical properties in work by academic researchers, all of which his pseudo random pseudo scientific method miserably fails to duplicate. Rugg was able to get BBC publicity for his rugged research. What he lacked in substance, he made up by arrogance."
I am removing this paragraph until I can write it in a less aggressive and inflammatory fashion chrisboote (talk) 00:11, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seriously unprofessional language here 

message: At the end it says 'The debate continues.' While this is undoubtedly true, the sentence is not necessarily in WP style (though more appropriate than the section whose deletion is mentioned above). Jackiespeel (talk) 09:44, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voynich Manuscript
Talk:Audrys Bačkis

message: *Oppose per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Western clergy). Firstname Cardinal Lastname is the preferred form. —Mira 19:40, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you'd like to withdraw the move nomination, you can do so. —Mira 22:40, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

text: No problem, I remember having to look for the naming guidelines too. —Mira 23:33, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Qwak

message: I've tidied up some of the content, as a lot of the game's release history had somehow wound up under the Gameplay section. Now the Gameplay section is incredibly short, so I'm going to try to add to it a little. Ray and jub (talk) 19:07, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tidy-Up
Talk:Alien Breed II: The Horror Continues

message: Shouldn't this article's title be "Alien Breed 2" as its common name? czar ♔ 09:49, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Socket 754

message: The huge list of chipsets really doesn't belong.  It either needs to go into a List of Socket 754 chipsets article or be removed outright. Aluvus 17:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chipsets

message: Seems totally apporpriate to me.
MichaelJHuman 00:40, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chipsets
Talk:Giacomo Biffi

message: This sentence: "Biffi has stated ... that Catholics must prepare for persecution by homosexual activists and their allies," is not supported by the source material, in which Biffi asks, in the hypothetical, "Is it still permitted ... to be faithful and consistent disciples of the teaching of Christ ... or must we prepare ourselves for a new form of persecution, promoted by homosexual activists, by their ideological accomplices, and even by those whose task it should be to defend the intellectual freedom of all, including Christians?"  He is not affirming that gays will persecute Catholics, he is questioning what will happen and presenting two concrete options: persecution is one, and the other is non persecution.  Also the phrase "exceedingly rich," which appears in quotes and is attributed to Biffi, is not uttered by Biffi in the article cited, but is used by the author of the article.  That's just misleading.   108.23.216.206 (talk) 16:59, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sensationalist bent?