lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:General Mills

message: Hello sir and mam last time I sen my documents for your company But company not receive my documents I send documents for Aramex courier  please one time notice this document please 2400:1A00:BD11:8E4:E19F:8B68:3B80:CD29 (talk) 05:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Visit www.generalmills.com and look for support information. Vacosea (talk) 00:03, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Flavio Briatore

message: Fix dead link for "Flavio Briatore finally ties the knot" to the new URL, 
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/grapevine-briatore-finally-ties-the-knot-4422754/4422754/ 2001:56A:7A66:5200:10C9:AF0F:96C1:93EB (talk) 18:59, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:24, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 October 2022
Talk:British American Racing

message: The photo of Jenson button is titled "Jenson Button driving for British American Racing at Indianapolis in the 2005 United States Grand Prix" yet no cars other than Ferrari, Minardi, and Jordan participated in that GP.  I'm not sure where the picture is from, but it probably should be 2004 or labeled 2005 qualifying.
--152.121.16.49 16:52, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Grand Prix" often refers to the hour or two on a Sunday when the cars actually race. However "Grand Prix" can also refer to the Grand Prix weekend. In this case the weekend in question was 17-19 June (with the race on the 19th). The picture is from either a free practice session or qualifying (i.e on the 17th or 18th). Also the 2004 livery was quite different from this image. Having said that changing it to "2005 qualifying" would be more precise. Mark83 10:16, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jenson Button Photo 

message: I have undone the last alterations. The explanation is below.
The last alterations made to the Speed Record Attempt section were not meant to inform. They are clearly an opinion of a CART fan who changed the text to praise CART and bash F1. The speed record attempt was to break the 400km/h barrier with a F1 car according to 2005 F1 regulations, so no comparison to past CART cars is useful to the reader of the article. You can compare how slow CART cars are compared to rocket-powered cars as well, but that has nothing to do with BAR and its speed record attempt, the same is applied to the comparison between CART and F1 cars.
Tilinelson2 (talk) 17:26, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speed Record Attempt
Talk:Ron Dennis

message: Shouldn't there be a bit about his personal life too?
Does anyone have a source for Frank Williams' accident being a factor in Honda adding support to McLaren, considering that the crash was over a year before the deal was done?
MartinUK 18:06, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal Life

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 07:03, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 

message: In the right hand column (below photo) in the list of information, under Spouse it states "died 2008" I think this should be divorced 2008.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.141.151.243 (talk) 23:33, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing out the error. DH85868993 (talk) 11:45, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lisa Dennis (spouse)
Talk:GP Racing

message: Does anyone know who the new editor in chief is? This may need some editing when anyone does know. 81.132.165.174 16:44, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have the pages from July 09 - so can anyone fill in the gap? Spa-Franks (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 21:44, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cover Pages
Talk:Glass transition temperature

message: What is the reference(s) for the table of values? According to the table here the glass transition temp of PVC is 81 C, but in the PVC article it says its 87 C. Neither have a reference listed. Wizard191 (talk) 14:41, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References for the table of values 

message: It's hardly possible to discuss glass transition and glass transition temperature independently of each other.
By the way: the glass transition can also be driven by pressure. Unless we do the merge, we cannot avoid the logic that warrants another article entitled glass transition pressure ...
-- Paula Pilcher (talk) 11:54, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This merge proposal makes sense, but it looks like it could be a bit of work to get it right. I hope that you are up to the task, Paula. --Ben Best (talk) 13:48, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Primarily, it requires a major cleanup of glass transition. At present that article contains sections that are largely off-topic. I will wait some time for response before starting the purge ...  Paula Pilcher (talk) 16:31, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Proposal
Talk:Human Development Index

message: ಪೀಠಿಕೆ  2409:408C:8D91:5962:0:0:7B0B:AA0D (talk) 15:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ಭಾರತದ ಮಾನವ ಅಭಿವೃದ್ಧಿ ಸೂಚ್ಯಂಕ ಗಳು ಪೀಠಿಕೆ  

message: Hey, 
I would move the sentence 
"The index does not take into account several factors, such as the net wealth per capita or the relative quality of goods in a country."
to the criticism section because it does not really belong in the summary imho. Geldbogen (talk) 17:58, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move sentence about not-inclusion of wealth per capita to "criticism" section
Talk:List of Formula One drivers

message: Map of countries of Formula 1 drivers on Wikipedia includes occupied Crimea as part of Russia. This kind of subtle Russian propaganda & disinformation is highly effective and has no place on Wikipedia. Needs to be fixed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexandrestark (talk • contribs) 14:11, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not "subtle Russian propaganda & disinformation". This map shows de facto borders. This map does not show borders by legal consensus. The reality of the situation is that Russia has successfully annexed the Crimea - this is why it is coloured together with Russia. This is also why Taiwan is not coloured the same as China, despite it officailly being part of China. SSSB (talk) 14:39, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia should not be a repository for factually incorrect propaganda. Crimea is recognized by the UN and internationally as Ukraine. The deliberate introduction of factual errors for purely political reasons by biased individuals is vandalism. Even the Russians do not claim Crimea as part of Russia, but as a separate Republic. Crimea is neither de facto nor de jure part of Russia. End of debate.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.70.99.252 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You clearly do not understand what de facto means. Either that or you do not understand the situation in Crimea. As explained in Political status of Crimea, Russia claims Crimea as a Russian republic, a federal sub-division of Russia. Russia and their allies claim that it is de jure Russian. Ukraine and their allies claim Crimea is de jure Ukrainian. But everyone agrees that it is de facto Russian. That is the only thing all sides agree on. Because this map uses de facto borders consistently, it is not factually incorrect. It simply displays an alternate representation - one where political borders are shown as de facto, not de jure. The only person being politically biased here is you. Because you are insisting on highlighting that Crimea is de jure Ukrainian but are ignoring other de jure borders (most significantly for this map, the status of Taiwan, which should be coloured with China if you were consistent in your view.) SSSB (talk) 20:20, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You should stick to your field of expertise, which is evidently motor racing not politics, because you are clearly out of your depth with this cringeworthy & sophomoric apology for authoritarian ideology. 203.52.58.164 (talk) 21:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: When "Seasons competed" contains a range '–(EN DASH)' is used rather than '-(Minus)' as the separator.
When the new season(2024) started new ranges were formed(I think only Oscar Piastri and Logan Sargeant).
These have used the minus symbol.
As there is very little visual difference between the two symbols I think it would cause less confusion if minus was used as this is readily available on the keyboard and, in my experience, what is generally used. 92.29.132.127 (talk) 09:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  -(Minus) vs –(EN DASH) Edit 29th February
Talk:Peter Sauber

message: Missing a huge portion of Sauber's accomplishments in sports car racing...
What about his time in association with Mercedes and the highly successful
C8 and C9 models that dominated LeMans in the late 80's before the track
was ruined by ridiculous chicanes?  That was a huge part of Peter Sauber's
motorsports legacy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:CF0A:CD40:CD09:4F29:2AEC:A46D (talk) 16:15, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Sports car racing missing?
Talk:Charlie Whiting

message: Whiting appears to have been involved in the handling of the black bozes from Senna's car after the crash. This appears notable.
http://www.ayrton-senna.com/s-files/newsfle5.html 124.171.199.35 (talk) 12:22, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Senna death black boxes incident 

message: Andrew Benson [BBC F1] reports Whiting died of a pulmonary embolism.
https://twitter.com/andrewbensonf1/status/1105995646165606400
David Crayford ☎ 01:01, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reported dead 

message: Autosport, Formul1.com, primalinformation.com, Seattle Times - haven't time to add from these sources atm, so leaving here in the hope that other editors will be able to. Mjroots (talk) 07:59, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Obituaries

message: Please also see articles such as this one, this book, this article, etc.  A search of FIA "official starter" confirms that this is the sanctioned term.--Phil Holmes (talk) 11:33, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Starter
Talk:Austrian Grand Prix

message: I'm quite sure the sportscar races held in 1965-69 were called Austrian Grand Prix. For example see the program covers . Also the 1970 race was called the 8th Austrian Grand Prix (not the 3rd as the article currently says, but I will soon change) according to a citation in it: . 1969 was the 7th Austrian Grand Prix . I will add these to the list of winners soon. A7V2 (talk) 02:12, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I should also add that these races are listed in the "Guiness Guide to International Motor Racing". A7V2 (talk) 02:13, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Races 1965-69
Talk:Brazilian Grand Prix

message: This bot has detected that this page contains an image, :Image:Circuit_Interlagos.png, in a raster format. A replacement is available as a Scalable vector graphic (SVG) at :File:Circuit Interlagos.svg. If the replacement image is suitable please edit the article to use the vector version. Scalable vector graphics should be used in preference to raster for images that can easily represented in a vector graphic format. If this bot is in error, you may leave a bug report at its talk page Thanks SVnaGBot1 (talk) 14:29, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed. DH85868993 (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Image:Circuit_Interlagos.png]] 

message: We don't consider Emilio Romagna GP on the same page as the San Marino GP or the Styrian GP on the same page as the Austrian GP - so why would the Sao Paulo GP use the same page as the Brazilian GP?
I understand that there's a bit of murkiness creeping in with Malaysian to Malaysia and Mexico to Mexico City so it's not as clear cut as it used to be, but I still think that this should be considered as a separate page.SchueyFan (talk) 13:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Sao Paulo GP
Talk:Agriculture in the Russian Empire

message: This article is necessary for collecting facts used in comparisons with the Soviet Union. I wrote some, out of my head, but I know nothing better and have no special interest in the subject, sorry.
1913: Россия: 55 пудов хлеба с десятины, CША: 68, Франция: 89, Бельгия - 168.
(1 "desyatina": cca. 2.75 acre, 1 "pood" = 16.4kg)
Mikkalai 20:34, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: Here is a fascinating talk by Andrei Fursov about the productivity of Russian farms, compared to western farms: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRGNi7gqvcg
--Nanite (talk) 19:51, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fursov talk 

message: This section has little to do with the subject or the rest of the article, it should be replaced with a concise summary.
--69.218.223.39 (talk) 15:02, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short Description
Template talk:Formula One Grands Prix

message: I realise it could be contentious but I have changed the current lists to include german/european rather than european, and moved european to future due to the valencia race. I realise there is the issue over the naming rights, but there are a variety of sources stating both, so it would seem safest to name it as both —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jrphayes (talk • contribs) 15:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  European/German Grand Prix 

message: Is this template really the place for potential future races. Clearly there is a place for confirmed future races (Abu Dhabi, European and Korean), but I'm not so convinced by possible future races, even if they have sources saying that they are possible (which they do). If we go down that road there are many more races we could add, all of which have sources, for example Mexico, Russia and Las Vegas. I won't take any action at the moment, but am interested in what you think. John Hayes 09:50, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible/Future Venues 

message: We Shouldnt we have the Las Vegas, Indy 500, Us east and west in this template.  Arent we talking about countries that have hosted a Gp?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pattav2 (talk • contribs) 14:05, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the template lists races which have been part of the Formula One World Championship. Nothing to do with countries. DH85868993 (talk) 16:47, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Races 

message: There are sources on the 2013 Formula One season article of the French Grand Prix returning to the calendar. Editadam 22:14, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[French Grand Prix]]
Talk:Czechoslovakian Grand Prix

message: I propose that 6 Hours of Brno be merged into this article for that they appeared to be the same event judging by the event running and how it appear concurrent to the other appearing to be the same event with different names. Donnie Park (talk) 10:27, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Has there ever been a 6 Hours of Brno? None of the race distances depicted are six hours long. Personally I think better writing could fix this. Not sure merging a 1990s sports car race with a 1930s Grand Prix is helpful. --Falcadore (talk) 12:36, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The 70-80s touring car race had the same name, as did the 80-90s sportscar race, so therefore it wasn't all 1930s. Donnie Park (talk) 23:15, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: My point stands, particularly about better writing. This is a great example of the limitations of tabling over writing. And the Six hour article still needs a rename. --Falcadore (talk) 01:17, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick peek at the article history jogs my memory - The 6 Hours of Brno was part of the initial 2012 Le Mans Series schedule before the event was cancelled when the LMS was cut in half.  Hence when the article was created, the title was correct for the planned future race. The359 (Talk) 07:41, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt highly that it will happen at this time, its now two seasons since. Donnie Park (talk) 15:46, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

text: *Reply to both; in case you do not know your history of the country, reading through a bit of it, what you forget is that CSSR stands for Czechoslovak Socialist Republic, in turn was Czechoslovakia under the communist rules, hence why I oppose the split as it is the same country with communist branding. The endurance/sportscar race used that name in 1988, then when it reappeared in 1997, it was called Masaryk Grand Prix, like the 1930s races did. Lastly as Falcadore implies, when have there ever been a 6 hour race, so I say push ahead with the merge as it is the same event with different branding. Donnie Park (talk) 15:33, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: *It may be the same country, but it's a different name for a completely different type of race. There's simply no way these should be merged together - it's literally like merging the 1000km of Buenos Aires with the Argentine GP! Just because the name of one of the events is totally wrong doesn't mean this is a valid merger. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:37, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Should it be "Czechoslovakian Grand Prix" or "Czechoslovak Grand Prix"? DH85868993 (talk) 02:14, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Italian Grand Prix

message: Should Lotus (Team Lotus) be bold in the multi-winners table? The Lotus Racing is a different team?--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 13:47, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team Lotus 

message: Hi, I removed Alex Filippovski from the multiple winners table. Apparently he won it in 2015 and 2016 !  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.155.12.156 (talk) 19:05, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work. --Falcadore (talk) 22:00, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alex Filippovski 

message: Given that Alpha Tauri and Torro Rosso are essentially the same team (same ownership, home base and staff after rebrand) should they not be included as multiple time winners.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tommy773 (talk • contribs) 11:27, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because they aren't the same constructor. Therefore, Toro Rosso have one win, and AlphaTauri have one win.  SSSB (talk) 11:47, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alpha Tauri / Torro Rosso Multiple Time Winners
Talk:ZAZ Zaporozhets

message: The Zaporozhets cars of second generation were nicknamed Natasha-Prinz in Poland.
--Jidu Boite (talk) 09:21, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nickname 

message: Given current circumstances, should there really be a picture of Putin in an article about vintage cars? These are beloved in Ukraine and other Eastern European countries that are under threat from Russian expansion right now. Not what you want to see when you just wanted to think about machines. 107.126.24.108 (talk) 23:20, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Putin?
Talk:DA

message: ----
It seems to me that we have gotten off track in terms of this being a disambiguation page. Our definition of a disambiguation page currently states: 
"Do not disambiguate, or add a link to a disambiguation page, if there is no risk of confusion. Ask yourself: When a reader enters this term and pushes "Go", would they expect to view any of the articles listed on the disambiguation page? Disambiguation pages are not search indices -- do not add links that merely contain part of the page title where there is no significant risk of confusion."
In this regard, it seems that "dumbass" (just removed)-- and likewise, perhaps also: Dorothy Ann, Daniel Amos, and Dumbledor’s Army might not be appropriate entries here. I'd like to hear other thoughts on the subject. Is anyone who is actually looking for "dumbass" likely to first encounter "DA", the way that someone looking for "District Attorney" would? Or are we simply listing any two-word names or expressions that could theoretically be represented by the two letters "D.A."? That seems unreasonable to me, given the actual purpose of a disambiguation page. "D.A." for "Doctor of Arts" and "D.A." for "District Attorney" are reasonable entries for disambiguation, as they are expressions that are frequently represented by the acronym "D.A." 
Asta2500 20:57, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Monaco Grand Prix

message: Is it true that part of the circuit is in France?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.236.120.178 (talk) 15:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Tvx1 12:52, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Part in France? 
Talk:Pacific Grand Prix

message: Hi, does anyone know why (or a web page that does) the Pacific Grand Prix even came into being considering there was already a Japanese GP / How they got two races?. I always wondered the same thing about the European Grand Prix until i read the info on that page - started as an honorific title then became a handy stopgap. Would be a useful addition to the page... extraordinary (talk)
:I'm sure I remember reading that the very wealthy Mr Tanaka said to Bernie Ecclestone that he wanted a Grand Prix at his circuit and Bernie said, "Anything is possible for the right money." So he paid his money and got himself a Grand Prix. Don't have a source for it though - this is just from memory. Readro (talk) 13:03, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting. That sounds about right. You can replace "Mr Tanaka" in your story with "Mr <insert name>" and your story also accurately describes recent circuit additions. Sorry that's the cynic in me... Anyway, if anyone finds a source... extraordinary (talk) 11:10, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation of existence 

message: The references to the 1960-1963 races should be removed from this article, as the majority of the article is about the 1994 and 1995 races. There should be a new page for the 1960-1963 races, and a disambiguation page created.
Asd36f (talk) 11:59, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The title of the article is not Pacific Formula One Grand Prix. Many of the other Grand Prix articles include historires which is not as a Formula One race, don't see why this race should be treated differently from any of the others. --Falcadore (talk) 16:55, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with Falcadore - inclusion of non-F1 races is consistent with the other "xxx Grand Prix" articles. DH85868993 (talk) 01:55, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creation of new page for 1960-1963 Pacific Grand Prix