Talk:Kalamazoo County, Michigan

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Kalamazoo County, Michigan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110531210815/http://www.naco.org/Counties/Pages/FindACounty.aspx to http://www.naco.org/Counties/Pages/FindACounty.aspx
*Added  tag to http://www.census.gov/geo/maps-data/data/docs/gazetteer/counties_list_26.txt
*Added  tag to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/counties/totals/2015/CO-EST2015-alldata.html
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6gpGlyhlr?url=http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk to http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kalamazoo County, Michigan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/607ZF6vhH?url=http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/26/26077.html to http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/26/26077.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:24, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I think the 3 October update contains significant improvement and amplification to the Kalamazoo County article, so it should be included. I get the impression that somebody doesn't like the choice of uniform format that was adopted in that edit; if that still bothers, then we could go in and chg whatever date-presentation is bothering us. But let's not throw the whole thing out. The editor is a member of the Wiki Counties Project, and seems intent on improving the Wiki articles.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.2.215.204 (talk) 21:56, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: And I removed it again. The edit removed multiple reference archive links without an update to the reference accessdate parameter to indicate that the original reference actually worked, removed a maintenance template for date format and then changed the date format in defiance of the template he removed without consensus, and in violation of WP:ENGVAR. You, IP, cannot possibly know the editor's motivation, nor can I. However, his motivation is irrelevant. The change did not improve the article and your restoration is in defiance of WP:BRD. John from Idegon (talk) 22:11, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restored 3 Oct Update