Talk:Kaesong

message: "kaesong," of course, should be mr, but i thought for korean topics like goryeo, we used rr. & for gyeonggi, a south korean province? in other words, the rr/mr determination, i thought, was made for each term, rather than by article topic, to avoid the same term being romanized differently in different articles withint wikipedia. e.g. "pyongyang" & "choson" (meaning north korea) would be used even in korea and south korea related articles. Appleby 23:20, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was thinking that the rump North Korean province should be named as a North Korean province, but it seems that the remnants of the North Korean "Kyonggi" were actually merged into Hwanghaebuk-do.  oops. Sorry for the mixup.-- Visviva 00:20, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Romanization

message: Shouldn't this sentence read "Kaesong was on the northern side of the line" instead of - - Kaesong was on the southern side of the line (within the Republic of Korea). Thus Kaesong is the only city to change control after the Korean War.[2] 1ragincajun (talk) 00:36, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Side of the line

message: Kaesong has no airport as mentioned in the Transportaion section. I will remove it unless proof can be provided, bet there does not seem to be any.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by N40798 (talk • contribs) 09:13, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: No airport

message: The assertion (History, paragraph 2) about Gaegyeong (개경) is not clearly stated. One can understand that Kaesŏng (개성) was renamed Gaegyeong in 960 and thereafter renamed Gaesong-bu in 995. One can understand that Gaesong-bu was the name of a bigger entity created in 995, while the former city remains called Gaegyeong, etc.
It is usually stated --as in this article-- that "Yi Songgye moved the Korean capital from Kaesŏng to Hanyang (modern-day Seoul) in 1394". Can we infer that Gaegyeong was an obsolete name in 1394 ?
In any case, it would be great to provide the hangul form of all the names used in this article, since the article is mixing the two kinds of romanizations.  Pldx1 (talk) 16:51, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, it would be great. Pldx1 (talk) 12:58, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gaegyeong 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Kaesong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110610082842/http://100.nate.com/dicsearch/pentry.html?s=K&i=291958&v=43 to http://100.nate.com/dicsearch/pentry.html?s=K&i=291958&v=43
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110610075444/http://100.nate.com/dicsearch/pentry.html?s=K&i=241864&v=43 to http://100.nate.com/dicsearch/pentry.html?s=K&i=241864&v=43
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110610080912/http://100.nate.com/dicsearch/pentry.html?s=K&i=258329&v=43 to http://100.nate.com/dicsearch/pentry.html?s=K&i=258329&v=43
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111009165958/http://www.knowledge.go.kr/jsp/theme/themeView.jsp?themeIdx=2872&dir=al&page=4&searchOption=all&searchValue= to http://www.knowledge.go.kr/jsp/theme/themeView.jsp?themeIdx=2872&dir=al&page=4&searchOption=all&searchValue=
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:24, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified