lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Speak My Mind/Archive 1

message: Not that I enjoy interrupting an edit war, but should this article even exist? Is there actual reliable sourcing to document this unreleased album? Seems like an unreleased album would have to be pretty darn notable and well-publicized to actually merit an article. As of right now, I would take this to AfD based on the available informaion, were this not protected. GassyGuy 06:57, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing query 

message: it's fan made the intro is from like an interview or something it's all jsut leftover shit. Columbia considered an immediate followup to Dangerously in Love but they scrapped it and didn't put it together or make a cover and shit. It's fake get over it. Also i would like to point out the name is misspelled her name is Beyoncé not Beyonce she always puts the accent mark.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by BlowMeAway (talk • contribs) 07:18, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This album is fanmade 

message: First of all, I had no idea that this would create the controversy it did.  I posted it because I realized that an album had been put together, and that I had read that Columbia had been planning on releasing a second album from Beyonce before B'Day.  That's why I posted this.  Sorry if I caused any major headaches.  Thanks to whoever updated it, because my wording wasn't so good, and I was unaware of the various tracklistings.  Oh and to whoever wrote the above comment, the accent over the "e" in Beyoncé is clearly visible on the cover. Bulldoggie101 16:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SMM Starter 

message: I'm the one who has been constantly updating this page while others delete it.
Ratizi 18:18, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ratizi 

message: Thanks.  I really appreciate it.  It is the first article I started, and researched, so I'm glad that it is still around. Bulldoggie101 07:29, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bulldoggie
Talk:War novel

message: The bibliography should be divided by wars, because there are many very important titles missing (especially from non-English speaking countries) but adding more titles without dividing the list in sections might make it unreadable.--213.140.21.227 (talk) 09:54, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography by war 

message: I created a redirect here from military fiction, but it is probably a broader subject that deserves a separate article. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  02:00, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military fiction 

message: The section about history talks about how the early war novels from the 17th century were picaresque and featured roguish/rakish and unrealistic characters. Would the various Robin Hood legends qualify, then, as war novels? You've got the rogue hero Robin Hood on the home front in the aftermath of one of the Crusades. --Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 04:16, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robin Hood 

message: Maximilianklein (talk) 00:01, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: WorldCat Genres
Talk:Takeichi Nishi

message: The Japanese article I translated most of the content from states that the 26th had Type 97 and Type 96 tanks.  Type 97 is understandable, but I don't think there was a Type 96.  The most likely candidate is the Type 95 Ha-Go, the article for which states that it was used by the 26th. If anyone can shed some light on this or just make appropriate changes, it would be much appreciated. - BanyanTree 19:08, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Type 96 tank

message: The full (unedited) picture of Nishi as a young officer shows him in Germany on military school exchange with young nazi officers. Just FYI.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.210.10.114 (talk) 02:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edited photo?
Template talk:GEO

message: Is it possible to pipe the link on this template so that it points to Georgia (country)? Khatru2 11:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Erm, yes, in fact that's what it already does and has done for some time AFAIK. —Nightstallion (?) 00:09, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears to be working now.  It was not when I asked. Khatru2 20:06, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough, fair enough. —Nightstallion (?) 01:00, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Piping the link 

message: :io:Shablono:GEO. Thank you, Joao Xavier (talk) 19:35, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Please add the link to Ido wikipedia

message: Can someone please add  (country) after Georgia in the first parameter of this template, add |name=Georgia so that only Georgia instead of Georgia (country) is shown every time someone uses this template, while still transcluding  instead of , and also add  (country) after Georgia in the first parameter of  so that this template's documentation page links to  instead of ? -- PK2 (talk) 11:45, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: * Pppery * it has begun... 22:16, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 31 March 2022
Talk:Combating Autism Act

message: Why is there a total lack of a criticism section here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.174.255.70 (talk • contribs) 11:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article did have a criticism section, but I removed it as it was entirely unreferenced and highly POV. I also removed some POV content from the legislative history section, which stated that the removal of funding into possible environmental causes of autism was done 'over the objections of many parents', and implied that it was done for suspicious reasons. Robofish (talk) 23:38, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Extreme curebie POV?
Talk:Wasted Years

message: This page doesn't say anything about the cover of this song, done by the band DevilDriver, for the "Maiden Heaven: A Tribute to Iron Maiden" tribute album. I wasn't sure if there was a reason for this, so I thought I'd ask if anyone else thought that it should be mentioned. Parad0x130 (talk) 03:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  DevilDriver Cover 

message: Under "B Sides", the article has:
 The demential song "Sheriff of Huddersfield" ...
What is "demential" supposed to mean?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.130.71.68 (talk) 09:51, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unusual Word
File talk:Mutt.png

message: Does anyone find it funny the content of the email in this screenshot? 203.144.11.199 11:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah... not only the mail's content, all mails are spam :D --cholo 18:06, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Very funny. 155.178.4.10 (talk) 18:48, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

text: I'm a little concerned though.  It seems possible that the email author's copyright is being violated.--24.130.12.146 (talk) 08:52, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Twister (magic trick)

message: The video I have attached ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJOTKo5wOaE) demonstrates the effect - this veryfying the information.
Why is this proposed for deletion?  I've seen this trick a dozen times.  Czolgolz 18:48, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I found this in the page history:
:The trick consist in a mirror in V form, the Rolled clothing must be clamped by the assistant. The whole is proved by the fact that one sometimes sees that some fingers are reflected, if the cameraman more exactly films the Roll. The head turner is light to understand: The assistant must turn back the head about approx. 180 degrees, while the opening is behind. In a variation also is behind an opening, so that one sees the hair of the assistant. If one exactly looks before the hair of the lady, one sees light that it is a wig which is on a part which closes to castes just, nevertheless, behind.
It's unclear to the point of being unusable, and of course it's uncited, but I'm concerned that we may be removing method descriptions purely on exposure grounds. Bovlb (talk) 09:37, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Method
Talk:Sanctuary (Iron Maiden song)

message: Hello fellow Maiden fans. Just saying that since I got into Wikipedia, which is only in the last few years, I've noticed a LOT of incorrect information, unfinished or half done information, grammatical & non-sequential information on these pages. With all serious due respect to the Original person/s who took the time consuming effort to write it in the first place, I've been slowly updating and "fixing" these issues. I have always used references for any of these issues that I may add and I don't as a rule change any of the write ups about the album/songs but I have added a line at the end just to reference the updated elements. This is not done out of some malicious self-important ego trip but out of a wish for people who read Wikipedia for a source of information to get the correct knowledge to start with, as unfortunately most of you would be aware of the bad rep it has as a source of information,  even though I personally don't think its as bad as some people have said it is. Nor is it meant to be a "#$%@ you" to others who have written on them before me....
Gr8sshopper 08:52, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: '''G'day'''
Talk:British jump racing Champion Jockey

message: Is there a system in place to separate jockeys level on wins?  If so when was it introduced? Perfectamundo (talk) 00:00, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not as far as I know. The only shared title in my living memory came when John Francome stopped riding one season to allow a share of the title with the injured Peter Scudamore - he stopped when he drew level, knowing there was no tie-breaker in place. Titles are generally shared in the various jockeys' championship - Seb Sanders and Jamie Spencer shared a Flat title a few years ago and the Flat apprentice title has thrown up a few shared winners --Bcp67 (talk) 08:36, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: One winner or more?

message: Champion Jockey is capitalised in the article title, but not in the main text. This should be standardised on whichever form is more acceptable. Loganberry (Talk) 15:52, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalisation? 
Talk:ASL (disambiguation)

message: I removed the text:
 ASL, Alycia Shernelle Lindstrand
since I can find no reference to this person on Google and the only references in Wikipedia are here and on the talk page for the person who added it User:Al33460. Adding the above entry is the only thing that this user has done on Wikipedia.
Looks like vanadalism or vanity to me.
--62.232.27.82 11:50, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Tollemache, 5th Baron Tollemache

message: I have removed all the information about what their children do, and who there are friends with because it read like a social page! Wikipedia is meant to have factual information, not details on their friends and so; and certainly not on their parents page. In addition, the fact that Lord & Lady T went to the Queen's 80th birthday service is not notable, hundreds of people attended. --Berks105 12:20, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tidy

message: I'm assuming the above is his wife's brother? We also need to pull back someone the family info into this page as it's in his eldest son's atm Alci12 18:11, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[David_Auldjo_Jamieson]]
Talk:Coolpix S10

message: Although I'm sure this is a fine piece of equipment, the article sounds as if it had been copied raw from advertising materials. The author fails to produce a single section without using statements such as 'powerful', 'stylish', 'handy', 'unique', 'impressive'. Therefore I believe that this article has serious problems with NPOV and should be rewritten avoiding all the hype. Utsutsu 12:39, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Handley's Corner, Isle of Man

message: This point on the Snaefell mountain course or Mountain Course is preceed by the 11th Milestone and the next following point on the course is Barregarrow. The title of the course is Snaefell Mountain Course or Mountain Course rather than Isle of Man TT Course as there has been more than one 'course' and also the Tourist Trophy racing on the Isle of Man for cars predates the races for motor-cycles.  
Also the position on the map is also inaccurate. Perhaps you would like to correct this as with other points on the Snaefell mountain course and use a better map that already exsists. Would someone alter the title of the Template Box as I have been unable to do so. (11thmilestone (talk) 12:54, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Handley's Corner/Template TT Course 
Talk:Copenhagen Airport railway station

message: The article tries to described a single station named "Lufthavnen", which is serviced by the metro as well as mainline trains. This does not quite match reality. Most conspicuously, the mainline station is named "Københavns Lufthavn, Kastrup" (though the comma sometimes is missing) in everything from timetables to platform signage.
It would be most correct, in my opinion, to say that there are two rail stations in the vicinity of Copenhagen Airport:
* A mainline station "Københavns Lufthavn Kastrup", directly below Terminal 3.
* A metro station "Lufthavnen", accessible by stairs and a walkway from the landside end of Terminal 3.
However, it would be confusing for readers who are not prepared to make such fine distinctions if we had two different articles. I think, therefore (but am prepared to be convinced otherwise) that we should have a single article that describes both stations, but describes them as being distinct, in different sections and with separate s-rail tables. Then Københavns Lufthavn, Kastrup Station and Københavns Lufthavn Kastrup Station should redirect here, and be used in succession links at København H. –Henning Makholm 02:44, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems a reasonable approach to me. David Arthur (talk) 15:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two stations or one? 

message: Hi, I have added description of the more detailed location of the 2 stations in the airport, and the 3rd which has the same name as the airport - but is not at the airport. Hope it is clear...
About the table in the bottom I have a problem. There is no traffic on the "CphRos" system, and actually there never as been any traffic on this system which involved both Copenhagen Central (KH) and the airport (CPH). Only "KH to Roskilde" or "CPH to Roskilde" (bypassing KH). This line should be deleted but I can't manage...
Finally about the R40 system. There are now two systems, one the old R40 running Elsinore-KH-airport-Malmö and beyond. Another later system runs now between Nivå (south of Elsinore, also served by R40) to KH, to the airport and sometimes to Malmö South.
--Honymand (talk) 11:34, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments and questions 
Talk:A pata da gazela

message: Can you please take a quick look at this, which surely has been mistranslated? The footman cuts off her foot? What? If it doesn't make any sense to you either I think we should consider deleting Elinruby (talk) 04:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Must be some sort of mistranslated idiom
Talk:Oracle BPEL Process Manager

message: Oracle BPEL Process Manager is a well respected BPEL engine in the enterprise software world.  "Oracle BPEL Process Manager" has 82,000 google hits, including many third party reviews and project documentation on successful or ongoing implementations such as Monash University . John Vandenberg 13:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  dbprod is unwarranted
Talk:Bhoomi (band)

message: The page on Bhoomi is wondeful!Congratulaions !!!Web site address of Bhoomi I could get from here. 
The page is really informative and updated. Can we add lyrics of songs with or without permissions. Please tell
--somnath 13:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Dona Flor and Her Two Husbands (novel)

message: this really does read like a book review- can someone who's read the book 'fix' this? Cantras 19:39, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

message: I read this remarkable book close to 40 years ago and never did it occur to me that I was reading a "fantasy" novel. No Amado's novel is rooted solidly in the magic realism tradition of Latin America. Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 21:25, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Augusta2 I have remove fantasy from the description. As you point out, it bears no resemblance to the definition ilof Fantasy literature.Roundtheworld (talk) 21:48, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent!Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 13:12, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fantasy novel?
Talk:Red Lion (theatre)

message: I have removed the final paragraph, which was a verbatim "lift" from the MoLAS report (Phillpott) and in its own terms described somewhere which was not the site of the Red Lion. I have attempted to renew the source-link to MoLAS 2007 (pdf) where there may be other material which needs either properly to be acknowledged here, or else re-written with that as its citation. I have also popped in a couple of refs and done a general haircut and shuffle to wikify what had become a repetitious text, but more is possible, especially bluelinks. I have mended 2 links, but not verified the references. Lege felix Eebahgum (talk) 13:19, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio
Talk:The Pilgrimage

message: Comment moved from Talk:The Pilgrimage/Comments Astronaut (talk) 23:53, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error 

message: The original title of the book in Portuguese was literally "The Diary of a Magus". Athough the article does cite the original title, it should also add a translation of it. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 23:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaning of original Portuguese title

message: can we remove it?
imjust existing (talk) 03:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference section
Talk:Markus–Yamabe conjecture

message: To the anonymous person who modified the "Mathematical Statement of Theorem" section on November 29th: I have put the change back because removing the word "Hurwitz" from the statement makes it incorrect. The original conjecture was that the Jacobian needs to be Hurwitz everywhere, not merely defined everywhere. Geekdog 13:21, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modification
Talk:Tent of Miracles (novel)

message: I'm changing the reference to Professor Levinson as an American winner of the Nobel prize, because readers understand that the "Nobel" reference is pure media hype.  The author's satire is evident in the fact that there is no Nobel prize in the field for which Levinson was supposedly honored.  Levinson is simply a publicity-seeking academic who goes to Brazil to have a good time, hiring a Brazilian to do all his research for him.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lastudies (talk • contribs) 16:19, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Satire 

message: Someone contacted me to point out that I did not attach references to points of interpretation of the plot.  I know citations are needed, but I do not yet have the time to do them.  I have taught this novel in a comparative race relations course for over 30 years (I've lost count of the number of classes, but about 80). I never met the author, but I have discussed the novel with staff of the foundation in Salvador that he created before he died.  I have corresponded with some of the novel's Afro-Brazilian critics, including the late Abdias do Nascimento and his wife.  Citations are on my to-do list.  I welcome dialogue with other scholars who teach this novel.  My e-mail is lastudies2@gmail.com, and I'm at Cal State U. Los Angeles.  Bill Bollinger  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lastudies (talk • contribs) 20:11, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Wal Handley

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:29, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The Wal Handley pages needed additional input as it seems his race record can cause him to be misunderstood or underestimated.  My work is based on contemporary sources and do not express any personal opinions.  I've tried my best to help by inserting a brief 9 para factual biography while retaining most of the good work already done with slight editing and corrections where necessary of 1.1 to 1.3 2.1 and 3-4. and a few extra sources. The insertion of a factual biography followed by sections giving extra detail is the idea and I hope we can agree it works. Johnhandley9 (talk) 16:27, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Public opinion of same-sex marriage in the United States

message: Why is the map File:Public_opinion_of_same-sex_marriage_in_USA_by_state.svg inserted twice into the article? Isn't one case enough?--Adûnâi (talk) 15:17, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this map duplicated in the article? 

message: I think it would be easier to read if that section were turned into a fancy table. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 13:30, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could we create a table for the "national polls" section?
Talk:Wildlife of Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha

message: I created this page because there are not many like it, and no main resource for wildlife on the islands of Saint Helena on wikipedia. It does however need updating, some of the links are wrong and hundreds of pages need creating for the various species that are found there. Here is a good resource, as we are lacking in the "Insects of Saint Helena" part:
http://www.ascensionconservation.org.ac/wildlife.htm Segafreak2 13:37, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Created!

message: There is some overlap with the Flora of St Helena article. Why not call this page the Fauna of St Helena and develop the Flora part in the other article: Flora of St Helena. The Flora and Fauna articles could then be complementary. This seems to me to be the best solution. Alternatively the two articles could be amalgamated??
:I have removed much of the listing of flora species as they are already duplicated in the Flora of St Helena article. Maias (talk) 03:28, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename?

message: I've created a page for the World Wildlife Fund ecoregion - Ascension scrub and grasslands. I would like to copy or even move the Ascension content from this page to there. But that's only me. what does everyone think?
 and similarly I have created Geography of Tristan da Cunha and would like to take content from this page over there too. Istanbuljohnm (talk) 22:16, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  move Ascension content to it's own page - Ascension scrub and grasslands 

message: "The only poisonous animal on St Helena is the Isometrus maculatus, a scorpion from the family Buthidae" is included in this article. Is the intention to communicate that these animals have a venomous sting, or that their flesh is poisonous to humans if a human were to consume one, or both? 24.190.101.163 (talk) 17:39, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poisonous vs Venomous
Category talk:Wikipedians who like Power Rangers

message: Yea they just got taged for deletion so when that happens the user boxes will change. The Power Coins will stay there so that will be good, Sry...Phoenix741 13:40, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As long as the code for the box is there, ok.Phoenix741 16:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Those Damn Helmets

message: I've removed the displayed userboxes on the main category page. While I prefer the way it was, the included category in the userboxes is causing the category to be a subcategory of itself, creating an infinite loop. JPG-GR 05:25, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As long as the code for the box is there, ok.Phoenix741 16:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sub-Category Loop