lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Anthony Hopkins

message: Hopkins has been an American citizen for many years. Is there a reason why he is not listed in any category as American? (Sellpink (talk) 05:11, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: American Citizenship

message: In "Acting Style", how do we go from this:
Hopkins has stated that after he is finished with a scene, he simply discards the lines, not remembering them later on.
to this:
Renowned for his ability to remember lines... ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.178.228.126 (talk) 21:46, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There is nothing awkward about it.  The ability to choose to remember lines and the ability to choose to not remember them are not mutually exclusive.  A person can do both - but obviously not for the same lines.  2600:1700:EA01:1090:14B5:441B:1FB6:B40B (talk) 11:14, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: For Hopkins these are the same lines. He can selectively learn a large number of lines and them, after the scene is done, selectively choose to forget those same lines. It seems that most actors cannot do both. It might be worth adding some of that detail from The Guardian as a quote:  Martinevans123 (talk) 12:10, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awkward segue. 

message: In the Acting career section, under the Film subsection, there is a sub-subsection with the title "1990–1998: Hannibal Lector and Merchant-Ivory films". Here, the name of the fictional serial killer is spelt incorrectly - it should read "1990–1998: Hannibal Lecter and Merchant-Ivory films". Minor correction, but I can't edit the page myself.
: Many thanks. Now corrected. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:23, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested Edit - Hannibal Lecter 

message: If someone could upload some photographs from some of Hopkins' earlier films, like The Lion in Winter or The Bounty, I'd be more than delighted to install them into the article. Their scarcity is just plain weird--Hannibal Lecter weird. It's not like his career has faded away lately, or that he never made a movie before Silence of the Lambs.  The Final Edict (talk) 19:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Anyone have any photographs taken any earlier?
Talk:Saaremaa

message: The article Hiiumaa talks about an older Finnish name Yösalo = night island, which is a different ethymology than currently described here. It would be nice to see references to literature conserning the name ethymology. --LA2 (talk) 13:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: There is no reason to remove these images.  They are part of the island's history and culture.  Including them is making NO positive statement about the Soviet Union and its brutal occupation of Estonia and other countries.  Please leave them in place.
Wilson44691 (talk) 17:57, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soviet graves and memorial pictures 

message: Can someone add the IPA pronunciation for the name of this place?  RJFJR (talk) 22:58, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: I would suggest to verify the area.  The German Wiki-project has done that and concluded that the area is 2672 km².  In List of islands of Estonia it is 2671 km². -- Bk1 168 (talk) 19:49, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area 

message: Does anyone have photos of Angla or Piret & Toll?
As they are among the iconic representations of the island (along with the Bishop's Castle etc) I think they deserve a mention in the article!
Barrybounce (talk) 19:53, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Some pictures of Angla windmills you can find here. Flying Saucer (talk) 01:09, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 

message: Hi, these figures  - 10+16,195+16=42,195 km - don't seem to add up. Can someone familiar with the issue look into it? Muleiolenimi (talk) 11:24, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sport 

message: Hello, given that the links are all to other Wikipedia pages, I'm not sure this request for citations is necessary anymore? 
They will be adequately supported on their linked pages (and if not, then requests for better citation should probably go one those pages)
Happy to take care of removing it but wanted to check in first in case there is history here I don't know about! I don't see anything on the Talk pages or history about it though. Emixolydian (talk) 19:09, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing template message under Famous Residents?
Talk:Hereditary spastic paraplegia

message: moved from the article: Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia. Spinal nerve degeneration. Is there new inforamtion concerning generation of new spinal nerve material to replace degenerated nerves in spine?  Kosebamse 17:29 25 May 2003 (UTC)
Note: Added stuff from public domain text from http://www.ninds.nih.gov/health_and_medical/disorders/hereditarysp.htm
----
I strongly detest how this article was cut & pasted wholesale from the above url.
Macetw 13:17, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, as it was edited, it became much more technical and difficult for the non-technical reader to understand. I don't know what the problem is with closely paraphrasing public domain text which is written to be used to educate the public. --Nbauman (talk) 18:26, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: note

message: The epidemiology section needs to be rewritten. The following resources would be useful in doing it:
* 
* 
* 
* 
DiptanshuTalk 04:51, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Epidemiology 

message: "Spastizin (ZFYVE26) is zinc finger transcription factor: mutations in this gene cause SPG15." was added in 2015 by an IP address here and is untrue. I came across this because I am editing Adaptor proteins, vesicular transport and made a link to SPG15, which redirected to this page. SPG15 should have its own page, which at some point I will try to compose, if I don't run out of energy fixing all the crap I'm finding. JeanOhm (talk) 02:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  removal of nonsense about transcription factor 

message: Could I request that, in the prognosis section:
"Some cases are seriously disabling while others are less disabling and are compatible with a productive and full life."
Be altered to read something like:
"Some cases are seriously disabling whilst others leave people able to do most ordinary activities to an ordinary extent without needing adjustments."
The exact wording would need to depend on precisely what was meant.
As a disabled person (albeit not with this condition) I feel that the way in which the original phrasing assumes that life with a serious disability is necessarily not "productive and full" is an inappropriate and somewhat predjudice-laden value-judgement.
(I do appreciate that the current phrasing is probably merely a technical-to-conventional language translation glitch and was not in any way intended to be offensive or to encourage bad attitudes)!
FloweringOctopus (talk) 20:13, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change for more respectful language towards people with disabilities?
Talk:Hockey

message: >In most of the world, the term hockey by itself refers to field hockey, while in Canada, the United States, Russia and most of Eastern and Northern Europe, the term usually refers to ice hockey.  
Most of Europe and 3 of the largest countries is not a minority of the world. I believe it should be reworded to something like the below.
"In Canada, the United States, Russia and much of Europe, the term usually refers to ice hockey while many other countries, including the U.K., the term refers to field hockey." 2600:1004:B029:3E3B:2CC2:3C08:EE1B:4D47 (talk) 15:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hockey, the field version, is one of the most popular sports in India, a country which on its own has a population greater than all of those you mention combined. HiLo48 (talk) 02:48, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

text: Well no, because it's still false. In the UK and most of Europe hockey actually refers to field or floor hockey, not ice hockey. The rest of the world does not automatically conform to American tastes. Daisne (talk) 19:30, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate statement, request edit 

message: Please remove this phrase:
 they share broad characteristics of two teams playing against each other to propel a ball or disk into a goal with a stick
and add this in its place:
 they share broad characteristics of two opposing teams using a stick to propel a ball or disk into a goal
It's somewhat shorter, and it's simpler if "propel" is placed next to the propulsion method ("a stick") rather than the ball/disk and goal separating them. 192.180.91.15 (talk) 11:20, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Mvqr (talk) 14:28, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 February 2023 

message: — Assignment last updated by Mosbug1 (talk) 02:23, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Media and Culture Theory - MDC 254
Talk:Mildred Pierce

message: Hi Bryan, there are literally hundreds of articles in Wikipedia comparing a movie with the book on which it is based (there are very few exceptions such as The Boys from Brazil, where there are two separate entries). As far as Mildred Pierce is concerned, the comparison of the two was one of the major points of the former article, which you split up into two parts. Each of these new articles lacks information contained in the other one. In addition, you created a disambiguation page where none was needed before. My question is short and simple: Why?  --KF 19:50 24 May 2003 (UTC)
:Because I was repeatedly clicking "random page" that evening, and I came across an article that appeared to be about two different things that shared the same name. When I see an article like that, I disamgibuate. If you think it works better as it was go ahead and revert, I don't have a strong opinion on the matter. Bryan 20:04 24 May 2003 (UTC)
::Okay, thanks. KF 20:15 24 May 2003 (UTC)
:::Well, you've done it again—a completely pointless split into two articles, again without adding any content, so that the article on the film only consists of a comparison with the novel and the article on the novel has been classified as "start" because it lacks the content from the other article. Anyone really interested in Mildred Pierce should access an earlier version, such as http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mildred_Pierce&oldid=18658676 . <KF> 22:41, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book / Film comparison issue 

message: In the section about film & TV adaptations, there is this sentence: "[Cain was responsible for two sources for film noir classics - his 1936 novella for Double Indemnity (1944) and his best-selling work for Mildred Pierce (1945).]" What about The Postman Always Rings Twice? 
 --Sylvia A 06:41, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about Postman? 

message: There is a famous song "Mildred Pierce" by Sonic Youth. []
Best,
--84.191.87.56 (talk) 14:04, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sonic Youth 

message: I've changed "Veda becomes attracted to Monty and kills him when he does not return her affection" to "Veda commences an affair with Monty and kills him when he refuses to divorce Mildred to marry her." The former makes it sound like Monty wasn't interested in Veda, but Mildred does walk in on Monty kissing a recumbent Veda at his beach house. Veda confesses that the relationship has been going on for some time, and later reminds Monty that he told her he loved her numerous times. There was certainly no lack of "affection" on Monty's part, just a refusal to actually marry a "rotten tramp" like her. Sadiemonster (talk) 12:41, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Veda and Monty
Talk:Dark Shadows

message: IMDb now lists the original series as Dark Shadows: The Vampire Curse. Is that subtitle used by anyone else? —Tamfang (talk) 03:56, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  subtitle? 

message: no encontré nada de unas tarjetas del año 1993 de esta serie 190.87.168.77 (talk) 02:31, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serie dark Shadows  

message: Barnabas Collins’ character was introduced 10 episodes in (not ten months in) 2603:7080:C200:6EEF:2100:A65:8BEE:CC91 (talk) 15:54, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That’s simply incorrect. Rcarter555 (talk) 14:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barnabas Collins
Talk:Dynamic random-access memory

message: No one is gonna put it on the article of course but that's what I see if the Farber and Schlig is in reality a static RAM as stated by Avivanov above, in fact it appears that it is if the article of Static random-access memory on this same website is anything to go by. Would be nice if someone that knew about the subject completed the history section a bit because there is always the posibility that the Toshiba calculator might not be the first to use such memory mechanism. I could search for patents but I'm not an expert. 
Mirad1000 (talk) 16:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Added what I'm  sure is the Toshiba patent of the tech used in their calculators. There are earlier patents that describe similar capacitor memory though and the article probably should reflect that but I do not have the knowledge. This "DRAM" was probably used in some devices at the beginning of the end of 50s/ early 60s if we go by patents. Mirad1000 (talk) 17:51, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toshiba Invented the DRAM 

message: The first image's caption contains "It has a capacity of 1 megabit equivalent to 2^20 bits or 128 KiB." This is untrue. 1 megabit is equal to 125 kilobytes or 125,000 bytes; 128 kiB equals 131,072 bytes or 131.072 kilobytes. --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 18:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is right. It uses the outdated binary megabit that IEC calls more appropriately mebibit, see binary prefix. --Zac67 (talk) 18:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! Maybe we should add this information, as it may confuse other users? --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 19:20, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added some disambiguation as per MOS:COMPUNITS. --Zac67 (talk) 09:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I wonder if it wouldn't be better/more succinct to state at the top of the article the computer units at play, rather than scattering BINPRE throughout the article - assuming all such entries are uniform? It strikes me as cluttered to have every instance of a unit tagged as if it's being referenced to a source.  cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 18:39, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That's how it conforms to the MOS – but let's try a less clumsy hatnote which currently is not at all MOS. --Zac67 (talk) 17:31, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That's perfect! Thank you so much. I'm surprised the MOS would recommend the former, but these things are beyond mere mortals such as myself.  cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 22:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: To be fair, the MOS doesn't recommend inline footnotes but it seems to allow hatnotes for other purposes only. Sadly, it doesn't permit the use of more modern units such as Kibit and Mibit. --Zac67 (talk) 07:20, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Equivalent?
Talk:Paul Gottfried

message: "He is the author of numerous books and articles in several languages on intellectual history..."
Does this mean they've been translated into several languages or that he writes in several languages?
Thanks
-- TyrS  chatties  08:07, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Too vague. Removing "in several languages" until this is clarified.-- TyrS  chatties  08:18, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  articles "in several languages"  
Talk:Jakob Friedrich Fries

message: * < http://friesian.com/valley/dilemmas.htm >;
* < http://friesian.com/fries.htm >;
* < http://friesian.com/school.htm >;
* < http://friesian.com/valley >;
* < http://friesian.com >.
 hopiakuta  Please do  sign  your  signature  on your  message.  %7e%7e   Thank You. - 20:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Your [[ sign]]ature has no content. 

message: * Consequentialism
* Deontology
* Principle of double effect
* Violinist (Thought Experiment)
* Virtue ethics
* Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
*  trolley_problem 
* < http://friesian.com/dilemma.htm >:
The Generalized Structure
of Ethical Dilemmas
*    Among men there are but few who behave according to principles -- which is extremely good, as it can so easily happen that one errs in these principles, and then the resulting disadvantage extends all the further, the more universal the principle and the more resolute the person who has set it before himself.
*    Immanuel Kant, Observations of the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime
*    [translated by John T. Goldthwait, University of California Press, 1960, p.74]
*  kant_%28disambiguation%29 
*  cant 
*  friesian 
*  french_fry 
 hopiakuta  Please do  sign  your  signature  on your  message.  %7e%7e   Thank You. - 00:59, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also
Talk:Camping (recreation)

message: Gack!  All the gear links are red!
----
Camp is used to mean campsite but where is camping used to mean campsite? Inquiring minds want to know. Rmhermen 04:52 7 Jun 2003 (UTC)
: In Russia, for certain.  I talked to a Belgian kid recently, and IIRC he used camping to mean campground, but that I'm not sure of.  I simply preserved that bit of info when I did my rewrite.-Smack 18:27 30 Jun 2003 (UTC)
----
Took out the reference to air mattress because it won't really do what the post said.  Large rocks are still lumpy.  (I'd also argue that an air mattress is a subset of sleeping pad and doesn't need it's own reference.)  Rossami 06:14, 28 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: It does everything that a pad does, and better, and thus it deserves to be mentioned. -Smack 02:17, 29 Aug 2003 (UTC)
Talk:List of Greek Orthodox patriarchs of Alexandria

message: Why is ther a sudden gap in dates from Theodore II to Theophylactus (inclusive)? These men are listed as "coadjutor", with no dates given. What happened to the See at this time? SigPig 06:42, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coadjutors 

message: 1. There is already a page for Patriarchs prior to Council of Chalcedon in 451 to avoid dispute
2. The Church of Alexandria is generally considered Non-Chalcedonian as Chalcedon Patriarchs were "installed in opposition"
3. Greek Orthodox Patriarchs cannot include Non-Chalcedonian Patriarchs such as Dioscorus I and any after 451 listed as Coptic Orthodox or Non-Chalcedonian
:The List of Coptic Orthodox Popes of Alexandria includes all Patriarchs of Alexandria prior to Chalcedon, who are claimed by both the Chalcedonian and Non-Chalcedonian factions. So this list should include them as well. In fact, it's not even a dispute, really, it's a matter of agreement: both factions agree that those were the legitimate Patriarchs of Alexandria prior to the schism. The dispute is about the post-Chalcedon succession. Ohff (talk) 10:20, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who should and shouldn't be on this list 

message: Today's article on May 8 Eastern Orthodox Liturgics mentions three who are not on this list because this list unaccountably starts centuries after the first archbishop (patriarch to the Greeks, pope to the Copts) of Alexandria, none other than Peter's acolyte Saint Mark the Evangelist. It seems incomprehensible that this article doesn't mention him, even if for some reason the list can't be extended back to the beginning the way the Copts' list is. The other two mentioned today on the calendar but missing here are Saint Anianas, second Bishop of Alexandria (d. 86), and Hieromartyr Stephen II, Patriarch of Antioch (d. 479). --Haruo (talk) 16:33, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark and two others
Talk:Rockumentary

message: Would audio documentaries also be rockumentaries?  If so, The History of Rock & Roll and the Pop Chronicles should be included.  DougHill (talk) 23:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Audio Rockumentaries?

message: Removed the following from the article:
I am not sure what the etiqutte for pointing out inaccuracies is - but I believe this should be "Rocumentary" 
The term is spelt "Rockumentary" it the film "This Is Spinal Tap" in which the term was coined, so this is incorrect. 88.110.21.19 13:48, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of term

message: Would many concert films belong to this genre as well, then?  e.g. Stop Making Sense, Woodstock, Rattle and Hum etc.?  Or do they mean documentaries not about specific groups but about several groups, as representative of rock and roll in general?  They can't mean that, there aren't that many?  Koyaanis Qatsi
:I started a section on the usage of the term.  The term seems to have first been used about a radio documentary on all of rock and roll, and later used for multiple artist films.DougHill (talk) 20:35, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I moved this section down the page, added a citation, and requested more citations.  If no one finds these citations, this part (or the uncited parts) should be deleted.DougHill (talk) 20:35, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Concert films?

message: can someone add the documentry on the brain jonestwon project and the dandy warhols called DiG!173.54.200.196 (talk) 18:10, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dig! 

message: The introduction defines this as a neologism, but can this still be right when the term was coined more than 40 years ago now? What it definitely is, is a Portmanteau word, which I think is better as a defining feature. Lonegroover (talk) 09:56, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No comments received on the above, so I've made the edit. Lonegroover (talk) 13:03, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Just looking at the neologism page, there are ones there from the 30s, so I don't think the time disqualifies it.  Portmanteau is definite the more descriptive term though, so according to Strunk and White we should use it! Although neologism might also be a nice addition.  Spalding (talk) 13:54, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neologism?
Talk:Letterist International

message: It doesn't make sense, the Letterist International shares almost nothing with Isou's Lettrism (the similar name is only used ironically). The LI is a group created by Debord, and it's more a draft version of the Situationist International, of which anticipates many of the core arguments (source: Kaufmann 2011). In fact, it would be more sound a proposal for the merge of LI into SI, but the subject is sufficiently broad to have a distinct article.--Sum (talk) 03:13, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal with Lettrism 