lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Specman

message: Added some context / reordered words. Dont know enough about specman or E to do more. 134.225.216.200 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 22:38, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

message: Please refer to the page E_(disambiguation) which now gives the IEEE Std number for e. DFH 10:11, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  IEEE Std 

message: I have removed the section about H1B fraud, because I found an online source for the cited article here - and the article mentions neither Specman nor its manufacturer. The information might be suitable for re-use at a hypothetical article on Vision Systems Group. Elizium23 (talk) 01:39, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed section about H1B fraud
Talk:Triumph Daytona 675

message: I know the list of awards in the reception area are very likely true, but this article is the only article I've come by that list awards and doesn't list sources. See here, here, here, here, here, here, and here for examples. So this means we need to get cited sources for all of the awards listed here. I'm going to tag the section and remove all unsourced claims next week. roguegeek (talk·cont) 18:40, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do. Awards can be added as they are discovered down the line. Revisethis (talk) 07:37, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: "Add to this new front monobloc radial callipers and radial master cylinder that deliver track bred stopping power. For 2009 the engine management system has been calibrated to accept our new accessory quick-shifter."
This reads like a sales pitch - and a pretty badly-written one - rather than impartial information. Especially with the inclusion of "calibrated to accept OUR new accessory quick-shifter". 195.234.243.2 (talk) 10:42, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  2009: Sales Pitch? 

message: We should include somewhere info on the new 675R model with ohlins at front and back 87.194.223.183 (talk) 03:18, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  675R 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Varāhamihira

message: Merge From the article created under a different (and less common) spelling. Mereda 10:22, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed ethnonationalist nonsense about it being "controversial" that a 6th-century AD Indian astronomer who wrote critical commentaries on Greek and Roman works of astronomy, which he explicitly stated to be Greek and Roman works of astronomy, was influenced by Greek and Roman astronomy. There is nothing remotely controversial about this; we do not accept Indian government sources on charged issues like this (especially not sources that include no detail whatsoever regarding what they allegedly state. See Pingree for details; if you don't know who Pingree is, you are by definition incompetent to comment. Hölderlin2019 (talk) 23:46, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  removal of ethnonationalist gibberish 

message: , I am also troubled by the image you added in this version, because there is no information available about where it comes from. Who made this statue, and on what basis? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:06, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Information with Citations 21,22  seems to be misguiding and should be reconsidered by moderators.these citations are books with only personal views and can't be taken as scientific or historical evidences as it is all about satyuga,dwapar Yuga etc which is not historically approved.vedang jyotish /mathematics can't be considered historical from Vedas as Sanskrit was only spoken language before Maurya empire reign (300 BC), so how any sciences like mathematics, astronomy or astrology can be developed and written in any language without any writing script??? actually such books referred in citations are written by Hindu bramin propoganda teams with non scientific evidences,these people propogate fake credits to Hindu people for any scientific research.in ancient Sanskrit books Hindu bramins defamed foreign authers and researchers same as written in brihadsamhita. Bristol prince (talk) 20:55, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improper citations
Talk:Bandar Baharu District

message: THE ORIGIN OF FAMOUS ANDROID
 Masadavid010 (talk) 12:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Android origin
Talk:Air Astana

message: Dear Friends,
Please do not move Azerbaijan from Europe to Asia. It is the European country. Please look here - Europe#Political geography, List of European countries by population.
Also, please look here:
 
Do you see the map of Europe in the bottom-left corner of this Azerbaijani monetary sign? --Ds02006 (talk) 02:43, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No its not European.116.71.33.32 (talk) 15:44, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Azerbaijan is in Europe 

message: This article reads like a promotional release or an advertisement.  I question the neutrality.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.15.194.174 (talk) 18:50, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article reads like an advertisement. 
Talk:Igarassu, Pernambuco

message: I think this article should be either deleted or completely redone.  Some parts of this don't even make sense, and there is no way to figure out the intended meaning. --5ptcalvinist 10:45, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Deletion

message: I added some minor sourcing, it needs someone who can read Portuguese to expand it TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 19:21, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: There are two Igarassu rivers, Igarassu beach, and maybe other place names with this spelling.
There's also the Igaraçu spelling.  This needs to be made into a disambiguation page.Sbalfour (talk) 17:41, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambiguation needed 
Talk:Green Ensign

message: There seems to be no debate at all about whether it was legally approved at London (it wasn't), so I added the word "local"...  Probably the sentence should be further rewritten. AnonMoos (talk) 14:29, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Official status"

message: I was looking earnestly at the full-size version of that image, and I don't see any Green ensign.  There is a banner of the royal coat of arms (with the harp of Ireland in a lower quarter) next to some form of ensign... AnonMoos (talk) 22:21, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:File:Queen Victoria's Royal visit to Dublin, Ireland 3.jpg]]
Talk:Astrological compatibility

message: I added the expert template because I think the page should elaborate more on how compatibilities are computed in each case. Alex.g 10:53, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This irrelevant chart raises a few questions:
(i) what has this got to do with the craft of Synastry? Compatibility comparisons are made between people. This is the kind of chart typically used in Mundane, Political, or even perhaps Horary Astrology. Only a skeptic such as a so-called 'logical rationalist' would contravene the principles of astrology by using an example which is completely out of context as an illustration;
(ii) since when did the Millennium begin in New York? The day, month, year, century, or for that matter millennia are all calculated for and begin at 12.00 am on the First of January at the International Date Line, (or for the purpose of reckoning by calendar, at Greenwich). I suspect this is possibly more deliberate contravention of astrological principles, again out of context and typical of someone ignorant of how astrology operates;
(iii) is the Wikipedian responsible for placing this chart of dubious merit in so many Astrology pages doing so in an attempt to mock astrology, or are they merely innocent of their misuse of technique, through lack of understanding of the correct methods to be employed if one is to arrive at a relevant chart? 
I am not calling into question the accuracy or correctness of how the chart is drawn. For what it is, it represents the City of New York at that particular instant, but don't ask me what on Earth that represents! I am simply raising the question — what is it doing here? It has no apparent relevance – no argument from me about whether or not we are dealing in fruit, but isn't it a bit like comparing apples to oranges? 
Diagrams aside, as for the literary content and its validity and WP:NPOV, don't even get me started Samsbanned (talk) 13:55, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevance of so-called Millennium chart
Talk:Standard of the President of Ireland

message: How did the harp become a national symbol of Ireland? The answer belongs in the articles on Irish flags.
:Its just the banner of arms of Ireland, just like how other European nations have Head of State flags which are just banners of arms. Yes, the answer to the harp question belongs somewhere else. 202.89.155.120 (talk) 07:58, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Harp
Talk:Australian one-cent coin

message: The article mentions demonetisation in 1992 however demonetisation infers the legal tender status of an object has been removed. These coins have merely been removed from circulation but remain legal tender. Thoughts?
http://banknotes.rba.gov.au/legal/legal-tender/
Toxation (talk) 10:25, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Demonetisation vs. Removed from Circulation

message: Do we need two pictures of the same thing? Jimp 02:23, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The image has now been returned to the page.  It is not redundant as you have falsely claimed. Figaro 10:17, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed
Talk:Clerkenwell crime syndicate

message: I don’t think the text clarified that all of the members are dead? There should still be the possibility that there are new embers carrying on the drug trafficking and stuff, and all the original founders have all been let out of prison as far as I can see. 2A02:C7C:D722:5F00:18CB:B275:B813:7BD9 (talk) 18:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization still going? 

message: Although the gang is still active, according to the press Patrick Adams retired from crime 30 years ago and is living in Spain. He is not an active member of this syndicate. His son George Adams is not involved in crime. According the the press he works as an Uber driver in North London. The Universe of Nebadon (talk) 11:56, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patrick Adams and George Adams 

message: Case against daniz salih was dropped after
the defence  requested fall disclosure 
on George adams. Harlington hughes (talk) 17:28, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salih 

message: Agree with the Squeakachu (talk) + IP edits, this article is about the Clerkenwell Crime syndicate, not other people who appear to have no real connection to the Clerkenwell crime syndicate. Devokewater 13:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Squeakachu edits
Talk:Roland E. Arnall

message: So his son was ill, but he was the one who ended up dying?  No one knew he had cancer? -24.149.193.49 (talk) 08:44, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is this supposed to be external links? If so, some of them do not fit the guidelines.--CharlesDeMint (talk) 23:11, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links? 
Talk:Humppa

message: "Humppa is also popular among BSD programmers and other hacker culture afficianados." WTF? 81.232.158.237 11:23, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A number of the OpenBSD release songs mention humppa. I don't know enough about the subject to say if they qualify as humppa. Mostly I'd call them filk. :) --FOo 07:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, humppa is quite popular among the OpenBSD crowd. --Baldur 02:04, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  Search for humppa on the community web site, http://undeadly.org and see for yourself. :)  Magnus 02:35, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: There are many links related to humppa band Eläkeläiset who, by theory of music, are a humppa band. But their style of playing and fanbase is quite largely different, almost to the point where Eläkeläiset is more of a rock than humppa band. Most humppa bands play dance music in formal and/or semi-formal occasions. This article needs a picture of a "true" humppa band and links to their music. Article itself is accurate but needs sources. I try what I can but my time is limited and can contribute only occasionally. Eläkeläiset rokkaa!! \,,/ User:Woden  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.246.71.171 (talk) 12:46, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Eläkeläiset
Talk:Airdrie and Shotts (Scottish Parliament constituency)

message: Not sure the "Politics and Government of Scotland" box really fits this article. It was useful as a 'space saver' prior to introduction of the new info box at the top of the page, but it seems designed for articles actually listed in the box itself. Laurel Bush 11:29, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info boxes 
Talk:Motherwell and Wishaw (Scottish Parliament constituency)

message: Not sure the "Politics and Government of Scotland" box really fits this article. It was useful as a 'space saver' prior to introduction of the new info box at the top of the page, but it seems designed for articles actually listed in the box itself. Laurel Bush 11:30, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info boxes 
Talk:Kilmarnock and Loudoun (Scottish Parliament constituency)

message: Not sure the "Politics and Government of Scotland" box really fits this article. It was useful as a 'space saver' prior to introduction of the new info box at the top of the page, but it seems designed for articles actually listed in the box itself. Laurel Bush 11:31, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info boxes 
Talk:Hamilton South (Scottish Parliament constituency)

message: Not sure the "Politics and Government of Scotland" box really fits this article. It was useful as a 'space saver' prior to introduction of the new info box at the top of the page, but it seems designed for articles actually listed in the box itself. Laurel Bush 11:31, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info boxes 
Talk:Hamilton North and Bellshill (Scottish Parliament constituency)

message: Not sure the "Politics and Government of Scotland" box really fits this article. It was useful as a 'space saver' prior to introduction of the new info box at the top of the page, but it seems designed for articles actually listed in the box itself. Laurel Bush 11:32, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info boxes 
Talk:Falkirk West (Scottish Parliament constituency)

message: Not sure the "Politics and Government of Scotland" box really fits this article. It was useful as a 'space saver' prior to introduction of the new info box at the top of the page, but it seems designed for articles actually listed in the box itself. Laurel Bush 11:32, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info boxes 
Talk:Falkirk East (Scottish Parliament constituency)

message: Not sure the "Politics and Government of Scotland" box really fits this article. It was useful as a 'space saver' prior to introduction of the new info box at the top of the page, but it seems designed for articles actually listed in the box itself. Laurel Bush 11:33, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info boxes 
Talk:East Kilbride (Scottish Parliament constituency)

message: Not sure the "Politics and Government of Scotland" box really fits this article. It was useful as a 'space saver' prior to introduction of the new info box at the top of the page, but it seems designed for articles actually listed in the box itself. Laurel Bush 11:33, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info boxes 
Talk:Cumbernauld and Kilsyth (Scottish Parliament constituency)

message: Not sure the "Politics and Government of Scotland" box really fits this article. It was useful as a 'space saver' prior to introduction of the new info box at the top of the page, but it seems designed for articles actually listed in the box itself. Laurel Bush 11:34, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info boxes 
Talk:Coatbridge and Chryston (Scottish Parliament constituency)

message: Not sure the "Politics and Government of Scotland" box really fits this article. It was useful as a 'space saver' prior to introduction of the new info box at the top of the page, but it seems designed for articles actually listed in the box itself. Laurel Bush 11:34, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Slightly tangential to your question, but why on earth are we reproducing that constituency box on every article? Surely it would be far better to make it a template?!? That is why we have templates: to reproduce the same thing multiple times. --Mais oui! 11:39, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info boxes 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Firefly task force/Assessment

message: *Is there any justification for adding entry after entry of "(No changes today)" to the Assessment Log (and therefore the t.o.c. at the top of the page)?
:It comes to approx 2.5 screens/month
*I'd suggest that, at the very least, they be gathered into ranges: e.g. Date--Date (No changes today) RCEberwein 11:44, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, unfortunately that's done by a bot-- I can change it to a link to the log instead --plange 17:26, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ASSESSMENT LOG CLUTTER
Talk:FoxPro

message: Looking for opinions... when I decided to start this page last night, I could not think of a name to save this page under. FoxPro and Foxpro were redirects to Visual FoxPro. I changed FoxPro to a disambig page and Foxpro to redirect to FoxPro. That done, the best article title I could think of was FoxPro 2 (for the 2.x tree that ended with 2.6). Any suggestions? --Bill W. Smith, Jr. 11:47, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: name to save this page under.

message: Did FoxPro 2.6 run on Solaris or SunOS?
:Not to the best of my knowledge. BUT... if ibcs2 will run on Solaris then it SHOULD be possible. --Bill W. Smith, Jr. (talk/contribs) 21:16, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FoxPro on Solaris? 

message: I have added the Intro rewrite template. The opening sentence fails to make the topic clear to a casual reader.WideArc (talk) 21:07, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro rewrite
Talk:Ferrari 156 F1

message: The current name of the article is :Ferrari 156 Sharknose, but I believe we should use :Ferrari 156 F1. The main article name should not be :Ferrari 156 as there was also a :Ferrari 156 F2 car which preceded the Ferrari 156 F1. What I propose is:
* Ferrari 156 F1 - existing page renamed
* Ferrari 156 - redirect page.
* Ferrari 156 Sharknose - redirect page.
Does anyone object to this proposal? --Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 02:56, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me. -- DH85868993 03:27, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at this some more, it's really only correct to call the 1961 Ferrari 156 a "Sharknose" as the 1963 car no longer had the "Sharknose", but was still a Ferrari 156 F1 car, so will move the page. --Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 04:45, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Correction - it seems the "sharknose" design continued to be raced in 1962, but was replaced by a more conventional nose in 1963. In any case, "sharknose" doesn't cover all the Ferrari 156 F1 cars, so the page has been moved to Ferrari 156 F1. --Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 05:44, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of page

message: I've noticed some content in this article about "good Ferrari tradition" and "Chris Rea" and his "replica", that seems to be very close to what can be found on this Ultimatecarpage.com page. This would appear to contravene the Wikipedia copyright policy, which means that content should be either removed or rewritten. I haven't really had a close look, but at least two sentences would seem to be affected. --Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 08:12, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ha ha ha!  I'm sorry, but please just imagine the implications if an arrangement of three words, not even those making a complete sentence, could be protected under copyright.--Amedeo Felix (talk) 13:18, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible copyright infringement

message: I found a possible error in ths article. Look at these:
"The last victory for the Ferrari 156 was achieved by Italian Lorenzo Bandini in the 1964 Austrian Grand Prix."
vs.
"Unfortunately, then-Ferrari factory policy inevitably saw all the remaining sharknose 156s scrapped by the end of the 1963 season."
So how Bandini raced a 156 in the 1964 Austrian Grand Prix if there weren't any 156s after the 1963 season..?
Cheers,
Anton, Hungary
--81.182.47.154 (talk) 13:05, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  156s scrapped in 1963, won in 1964
Talk:Northern Rhodesia

message: I suggest that we split this page, so we got a separate "History of Norhtern Rhodeisa" page wich delas with the details of the history, and a general review of it on the "Northern Rhodesa" page, as it is with most existing countrie (i.e. Zambia).
The reason for doing so is that I am constructing a serie on the History of Zambia, and relevant subpages for it is needed.
Good or bad idea? Discuss it on Talk:History of Zambia.
--Screensaver 09:57, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split? 
Talk:Tropospherical

message: OK. After much lonesome and clumsy work in my userspace, I've written so far what you see here, and have now moved it out of userspace. There's not really all that much more I can add/subtract to/from it on my own. Hopefully some of you other wonderful people will also come and edit this one.
At this point, please consider that there may be gross factual inaccuracies - at least untill another editor takes an interest too. --Crimsone 11:55, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved out of userspace

message: Is there any reason not to merge this into Earth's atmosphere in a section? I fail to see the point of this standalone orphan. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 23:05, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge into [[Atmosphere of Earth]]