Talk:Isotopes of oxygen

message: According to http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070913170108.htm , the heaviest possible oxygen isotope is O-24. Since this is more up-to-date than the given references here, I think we should delete all higher isotopes from the table. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 16:53, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 14:19, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heaviest isotope 

message: I converted the shortened footnotes in this article to a much simpler format using . If you object to this in any way and want me to revert them, I'd be happy to do so. Just contact me on my talk page. 
The old version made an unnecessary call to  and was more complicated to read in edit-mode. ---- CharlesGillingham (talk) 18:08, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shortened footnote format 

message: There's a nonsense statement in the first paragraph. It is written there that "The shortest-lived is 12O with a half-life of 0.4 MeV.". Time cannot be measured using this unit I'm afraid. Please fix it. Regards, 83.6.45.47 (talk) 22:06, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual error 

message: "Oxygen-13 is an unstable isotope of oxygen to provide any nutrients outside of the zone." What does this mean?
Klausok (talk) 11:27, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oxygen 13 

message: Is there a reason that isotopes O-25 through O-28 are not included in the table? The following statement is confusing: "17 radioactive isotopes have also been characterized, with mass numbers from 12O to 24O, all short-lived, with the longest-lived being 15O with a half-life of 122.24 seconds."  The seventeen isotopes refers to O-12 through O-28, but the table only references O-12 through O-24. I shouldn't have to go to the talk pages to find why there is a discrepancy. Jdlawlis (talk) 16:26, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of isotopes 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Isotopes of oxygen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:17, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Isotopes of oxygen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090813220235/http://ie.lbl.gov/toi/nuclide.asp?iZA=80024 to http://ie.lbl.gov/toi/nuclide.asp?iZA=80024
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130115012317/http://www.petnm.unimelb.edu.au/pet/detail/radionuc.html to http://www.petnm.unimelb.edu.au/pet/detail/radionuc.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:53, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article doesn’t mention 's role in the CNO cycle. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:05, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  CNO cycle 

message: If 25O to 28O have been observed, then why aren’t they on the list? Being beyond the neutron drip line, as far as I know, is not a good reason. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:03, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  <sup>25-28</sup>O 

message: Apparently discovered a few weeks ago: https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.122501
Reyk YO! 17:54, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oxygen-11 

message: If yes add data right now and Merry Christmas 24.115.255.37 (talk) 17:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you; it turns out there is data in . I updated the table accordingly. ComplexRational (talk) 22:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there data for oxygen 11 yet 

message: Shouldn't oxygen-15 be listed as "trace" rather than "synthetic " , since traces are produced by lightning. 2603:6000:8740:54B1:5C62:6332:F746:B663 (talk) 02:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: See ) Lightning leaves behind a radioactive cloud ) and ( wikipedia/ isotopes of nitrogen) with the nitrogen-13 section. Also, scroll down to oxygen-15 on this page. 2603:6000:8740:54B1:FC27:25E0:460:FB3C (talk) 20:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oxygen-15 natural occurrence  

message: Here is an article from Science News: Scientists finally detected oxygen-28. Its instability surprised them. Rjluna2 (talk) 16:12, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oxygen-28