Talk:Tomoyo Daidouji

message: The following paragraph:
Most observers believe that CLAMP put in a yuri and shoujoai relationship in their work but that they did not intend to focus on this relationship later on and wanted to have a normal girl vs boy relationship to have the overhand. It's was merely impossible for them to finish the CCS series with a shoujo-ai relationship between Tomoyo and Sakura. Since they made the series for a younger audience. However they still wanted to keep open all possibilities for there fans, so they ended with an open end.
has been removed due to being excessively fan-speculative with no official support (though if such support exists, do provide it and link to it), argument inciting, and being really badly written. Also, various extraneous data (about Sonomi's relationship with Nadeshiko) has been removed, grammar has been cleaned up, and frankly there's no reason to Wiki-link to so many small words like "relationship", "feelings", and "mutual".
The article being now reworded to be more strictly factual and less interpretive, the NPOV warning has been removed. Put it back on if it still appears too not-neutral.
KLSymph 07:10, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV removal

message: Oh, why can't the eraser get all the credit?  =P  (Rather it wasn't the eraser itself but Sakura's act of giving her a gift when she was in need.)  --Crisu 14:11, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: haha, I know, but it kind of made it sound like "oh, hey, if you give Tomoyo an eraser she'll be all over you for LIFE!" -- Ned Scott 19:27, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Eraser Love

message: I finally found the source to that fact I remember about how Tomoyo was originally drawn to like Toya.  Unfortunately, it turned out to be a fan-translation posted on LiveJournal rather than something in a more 'official' format.  Nevertheless, it did come from an interview found in the Memorial Book (which I do own at home, so I can check the page number later on at least).  The link to the translation is http://usomitai.livejournal.com/68511.html  --Crisu 23:17, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Interview reference

message: I see no where in the article how old she is. how old is she? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Angelofdeath275 (talk • contribs) .
:Well, she's the same school year as Sakura, and Sakura is 10. -- Ned Scott 05:38, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age? 

message: Either she's an LGBT character (and stays in the :Category:LGBT characters in comics as well as the ) or she's not (and both tags are removed).  Comments? -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 04:47, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because she might be a lesbian doesn't mean the article should be tagged with the LGBT project banner. This is the same logic I apply when removing banners for, say, WikiProject Hats when they decide to tag every article about someone who whore a hat. A character being gay does not make the article about being gay. It's out of the logical scope of the project, and adding the banner just adds to the over-tagging problem. -- Ned Scott 05:03, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since you've removed the banner from at least four articles, and since you're not a member of the WikiProject, I'd like to take this to the WikiProject talk page. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 05:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't have to take it there, WikiProjects have no authority on such matters. I'll likely leave a message there anyways, in hopes of defusing this misunderstanding (although I can get a bit hot headed and make things worse, I shall try to stay calm). A scope that includes any fictional character that says they're gay doesn't help WikiProject LGBT, it doesn't help the articles, and is just a bad way to think about a project's scope. Now there's this added complication that we're dealing with a controversial topic, but keep in mind I take this same approach for most projects that start mass tagging fictional-topic articles, when the project doesn't have a real relation with the topic of the article. -- Ned Scott 05:34, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One of the reasons I think that any fictional character that says they're gay falls within our scope is precisely because there are so few such characters.  It's kind of like saying Alan Turing doesn't belong to the project - his being gay certainly wasn't a big part of all that he accomplished.  But it is a factor in his article and is a part of the project. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 05:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  LGBT? 

message: The article says Had such romantic elements towards Sakura existed, an uproar over the portrayal of yuri being shown to Western children would most likely have occurred. - this is too general and false. CCS aired (and is currently airing) in Brazil, with no censorship. AFAIK, Brazilian children are western children... Albmont 00:48, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Censorship