lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:La Salle Secondary School, Kota Kinabalu

message: This school used to be only for boys, until late 90s i think. Anybody knows when they started accepting girls? It should be added to the history section. kawaputratorque 17:02, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://lasalle.edu.my/. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Danger High voltage! 00:53, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Sawston

message: I changed Mansion House to Manor house, as I'm not sure that it was a mayor's residence? - Pontificalibus (talk) 21:44, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sawston Hall
Talk:Memorial High School

message: This page was tagged for cleanup.  I have removed extraneous links (all the geographical locations were linked) per the MOS:DP guidelines and consider it cleaned up, so I have removed the cleanup tag.  I am leaving the redlinks, although there are many, because I feel it is reasonable to assume that articles will eventually exist for these schools.  Besides, someone did a bang-up job compiling this list, and I'm not going to be the one to ruin it! SlackerMom 17:04, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Memorial High School Debate. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 4#Memorial High School Debate until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:14, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Memorial High School Debate" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Bordelaise sauce

message: The picture accompanying this article shows a watery, yellowish sauce. The picture's caption should make it clear that this is not the kind of Bordelaise Sauce that is associated with Bordeaux, France; that sauce is made with red wine and demi-glace, to produce a thick, dark brown liquid. MrDemeanour (talk) 11:08, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Category talk:Disused railway stations in Renfrewshire

message: I recently created :Category:Disused railway stations in East Renfrewshire, moving from this category to there several stations whose locations are currently within the East Renfrewshire council area. At the same time I also moved some articles to :Category:Disused railway stations in Inverclyde for the same reason.
Many of these changes have since been reverted by User:Pencefn with the rationale that, as these stations were in the county of Renfrewshire at the time of closure, they belong in this category. I understand that interpretation, but I believe it is a misguided one.
Firstly, convention tends towards categorisation by place in Scotland based on current council areas regardless of whether the subject of the article predates the 1996 reorganisation of local government. Thus, for example, John Dick (footballer born 1876) is in :Category:People from East Renfrewshire.
Secondly, the existing category structure subdivides :Category:Disused railway stations in Scotland by council areas (yes, I'm purposely avoiding for the moment the confused intersection of categories for both the Highland area and some old counties; let's sort that another day). This is despite the fact most closures occurred before 1996 and many of the local authority areas don't correspond.
So why should East Renfrewshire be treated differently? The problem, of course, lies in the existence of both an old county and a modern council area, both called "Renfrewshire". Pencefn's interpretation treats them as a continuing entity, although in my opinion that is misleading. The administrative county was abolished in 1975; the name wasn't used under the system of regions and districts. It only resurfaced in 1996, under a completely different system, applied to an area barely a third of the size of the county. Significantly, Wikipedia treats the two as distinct entities with separate articles, Renfrewshire for the council area, Renfrewshire (historic) for the county. 
Had modern day Renfrewshire adopted, say, the name Renfrew from the district it largely succeeded, we wouldn't even need to have this debate. For the sake of consistency and logic, I propose categorising by the current local government system as this ties in with all the related category structures. Jellyman (talk) 23:40, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd agree with that for consistency, as current boundaries ("Tees Valley" instead of "North Yorkshire" or "Cleveland", etc) are used for the England and Wales categories. – iridescent 18:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Revisiting this issue, I have moved the relevant articles back to the East Ren category given the lack of objections. User:Pencefn was never polite enough to respond to my querying his edits anyway. Jellyman (talk) 20:14, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What belongs in this category?
Talk:Morrisville, Vermont

message: In updating this article, I noticed that there is a separate article about the Morrisville Historic District (Morristown, Vermont). It seems redundant to have two separate pages? Could the Morrisville Historic District article be merged in a section here? (or is there a reason for having the historic district as a separate article?) - Dyork (talk) 00:10, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Should this article be merged with Morrisville Historic District article?
Talk:Lanark (UK Parliament constituency)

message: The article seems to confuse two very different constituencies, one a district of burghs (and therefore burgh constituency) 1708 to 1832, the other a county constituency division of the county of Lanark 1918 to 1983. Laurel Bush 17:23, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused, confusing article? 
Talk:Econco

message: Econco Division, a wholly owned subsidiary of CPI , has been a recognized leader in rebuilt power tubes since 1969. Its 40,000 square foot facility incorporates state-of-the-art testing systems that ensure production consistency and product reliability. Tubes sent in for rebuild are given a complete internal inspection and failure analysis. They are then rebuilt by hand and retested to the original tube specifications. Econco maintains an extensive inventory of rebuilt tubes for immediate shipment to their worldwide customer base.
http://www.secinfo.com/dsvrp.1eH7.d.htm
Rebrandon 17:24, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Anthe (moon)

message: This moon is now named Anthe.  --Volcanopele 17:30, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved, and trying to fix references in other articles. --Patteroast 23:17, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: I've just uploaded an audio recording of the article. Please let me know if I've mispronounced anything. :-) --Mangst (talk) 01:49, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoken Wikipedia recording 

message: The main list of Saturnian satellites says it's ~0.007 x 10^15 kg, and ~1km ... obviously its dimensions might not be entirely certain at the moment, but 7 gigatonnes vs 5 gigatonnes, and 2km vs 1km is quite some difference, to appear on two hyperlinked lists... 
Also, many of the individual moon pages lack things like surface gravity figures etc - if we have the size, mass, density already, can't that and probably several others be calculated from them? 209.93.141.17 (talk) 16:46, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: edit: never mind, I found the data on NASA's website, and have updated the details here accordingly; will attempt similar on the primary list as well. 209.93.141.17 (talk) 19:09, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  actual size?
Talk:Sandstorm (vehicle)

message: Five cars finished the course of  the 2005 DARPA Grand Challenge: Sandstorm & H1ghlander & TerraMax & Kat-5 & Stanley. It is interesting to compare them to the earlier VaMP robot car of Mercedes-Benz and Ernst Dickmanns. My sources are mostly Wikipedia and the rest of the web. In 2005, the DARPA cars drove 212 km without human intervention.  In 1995, the VaMP drove up to 158 km without human intervention. The DARPA cars drove on a dirt road flattened by a steamroller. The VaMP drove on the Autobahn. In both cases the road boundaries were easily identifiable by computer vision. Like many commercial cars, the DARPA cars used GPS navigation, essentially driving from one waypoint to the next (almost 3000 waypoints for the entire course, several waypoints per curve). Like humans, the VaMP drove by vision only.  The DARPA cars reached speeds up to 40 km/h. The VaMP reached speeds up to 180 km/h. So the VaMP was more than four times faster although its computer processors apparently were 1000 times slower. The DARPA cars did not encounter any traffic but there were a few stationary obstacles. The VaMP drove in traffic around moving obstacles, passing other cars.  Interestingly, the 2007 Urban Grand Challenge  is trying to repeat something the VaMP was already able to do 12 years ago. Willingandable 17:37, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[VaMP]] (1995) vs [[Sandstorm (vehicle)|Sandstorm]] & [[H1ghlander]] & [[TerraMax (vehicle)|TerraMax]] & [[Kat-5 (vehicle)|Kat-5]] & [[Stanley (vehicle)|Stanley]]  (2005)
Talk:Third Energy

message: This hould be merged back into the main article--there's not enough in-depth information to warrant a separate article, and plenty of space in the main article. If there's no objections, I'll try to do so in the next few days... — Scientizzle 17:53, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As i said, "It's hard now. cos the series page has been deleted. and so theres no page to add this on to.". So where can we merge it to? OV  —Preceding unsigned comment added by OsirisV (talk • contribs) 15:30, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge
Talk:Violator (company)

message: Should also mention Mona Scott, who was co-owner and president, and according to text here even (co-)founder. --82.170.113.123 (talk) 12:26, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: She was indeed the "former president and co-founder", which is also mentioned here on the official website of Mona Scott's company. --82.170.113.123 (talk) 12:41, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Worked with Lighty on the company for nearly "two decades" an the company was founded about 1995, so she worked at Violater from the start up to pretty much 'yesterday'. Why is she not mentioned in this article... --82.170.113.123 (talk) 12:52, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mona Scott
Talk:List of tramcars of the National Tramway Museum

message: What is the point of this page if it's replicating National Tramway Museum?  --Escape Orbit 17:53, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, eventually, this page will have the full fleet on it. It will not replicate the current page. Some people have expressed that there are a lot of blanks in the current table, so this page will replace it, with only details applicable to that tramcar. It will be slow going - there is a lot of info to move, without replicating the table, and pictures need to be uploaded - I was there yesterday, and am armed with several! Bluegoblin7 18:00, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK.  I was just wondering why this page didn't link to the other, as that would make a lot of sense and provide some of the context it currently lacks. --Escape Orbit 19:09, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. I haven't got round to linking it up till now, but there should now be a link! Bluegoblin7 19:15, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Having found this whilst scaning the bot generated assessed articles by quality list and it had no importance attached, (but since given one by BG7 according to edit history) i think its medium and C class rated so have updated the derbyshire rating. Other projects may differ in there veiw point & rating as more specialist veiw point. but its got good content coverage (may not be complete), photos, and inline refs so exceeds start class definition. - BulldozerD11 (talk) 21:52, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this is an old thread, but I increased the number of commons galleries for various trams, buildings, and other structures at the museum. I haven't heard any comments on my creations, so I'd like to know what the rest of you think of them. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  03:34, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment WP Derbyshire
Talk:Savoia-Marchetti SM.62

message: Shouldn't this be the Savoia-Marchetti S.62 rather than SM.62 - it seems to be more generally referred to as such. Nigel Ish 17:59, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of Aircraft/Article 

message: A large recent edit appears to be confusing this aircraft type with the Savoia-Marchetti S.64 or perhaps there is an explanation? Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 18:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Edit undone, no response to query. Wikidata, seven other language wiki articles and sources describe a biplane flying boat. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 09:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: My apologies for that mistake, not sure how I loaded up the wrong one. Kyteto (talk) 10:16, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope?
Talk:Walter Wigmore

message: Some of Wigmore's profile on pp.171–72 of Tony Matthews' 2010 book Birmingham City: the complete record  is a verbatim copy of some of the content of this article. While I'm flattered that my writing is considered good enough to use in print, I should clarify that the content concerned was published here in 2007, three years before Mr Matthews' book came out. So if anyone notices the similarity, there's definitely no copyright violation here :) cheers, Struway2 (talk) 12:40, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-used content
Talk:Nasi goreng pattaya

message: We need a photo of this dish. --Anthony5429 19:44, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reqphoto 

message: In Thai, we refer to this menu as Khao Ho Khai, which I translate word by word as Rice Wrap Egg. Vee (talk) 05:10, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Thai
Talk:Engine block

message: I edited the old Big Block article, prior to its being merged with this one. 
In a nutshell, the term big block, as oppossed to small block, refers to the physical dimensions of the block, NOT the displacement of the cylenders. Thus, GM produced a 400 cubic inch engine in both big and small block form.
An important distinction if only because it is a common confusion. The current Z06 corvette, at 7L is a small block, while the mid-60s Olds 425, at 7L, is a big block. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.218.95.151 (talk • contribs) 18:08, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There's a discussion at Talk:Monobloc engine that's likely to be of interest. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:40, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Monobloc engine]] 

message: What is cylinder block 2402:8100:3923:9ED4:0:0:0:1 (talk) 14:56, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is Cylinder block?
Talk:Monmouth Academy (Maine)

message: Would someone that still lives in monmouth mind taking some quick shots of the Academy that can be posted on this page?  Would like get an image on here that doesn't offend the wikinazis.  Thanks, Malriem 18:17, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:42, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Wikipedia talk:Uphill battles

message: Hello, I saw  mentioned here:
*User talk:John Broughton/Editor's Index to Wikipedia#Question
so I had a look, and I saw some things to add. In particular, I suspect a contributing factor in many Wikipedia disputes is a seeming lack of awareness that other wikis exist. So I called attention to that in a few spots. --Teratornis 18:21, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  My edits 

message: I don't think it's good to try to deter people from bucking the majority. Since when is the majority generally right? If it were, we could just base decisions on the majority, rather than having it be overridden by policies adopted by a broader consensus.
Sometimes the majority (or even the consensus) is wrong, and someone has to be the first to say, "You're wrong, and here's why." We should encourage people to do that, as long as they have read the arguments of the majority and determined that there is a reasonable basis for claiming their own view is correct. Remember the Abilene paradox. Obuibo Mbstpo (talk) 16:35, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Majority is not necessarily usually right

message: The way I set up WP:BRD was as a manual for dealing with 12 angry men. AKA: how to fight uphill battles, make friends, influence people, and -ultimately- win. (typically by leveling the terrain first, by taking on people 1-by-1 instead of all at once... Eh what? Cheating? Noooo, I would NEVER! O:-) Would I? }:-)> ) 
Sooo, I'm not so sure I like the recommendation for walking away. Perhaps some of the BRD content and this page could be merged instead... hmmm.... <considers> <scratches head>
--Kim Bruning (talk) 13:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this page the antagonist of [[WP:BRD|Bold Revert Discuss]]?
Talk:Kenpeitai East District Branch

message: Hi, this is a good article but I can not promote it any further because I do not have the authority to do so. If you want to get this article to a higher class you will have to put it through WP:GAC and WPMILHIST A-class review. Kyriakos 22:26, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your review and suggestion, I may take it to WPMILHIST A-class review in future. Rgds -- Aldwinteo 05:07, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 
Talk:Conquerors'

message: The constituent books do not establish sufficient notability. JASpencer (talk) 10:01, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - these would be best in a single article. StephenBuxton (talk) 12:47, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Best to merge. Jorgenplass (talk) 16:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree with the Merge Catwhoorg (talk) 20:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge with constituent books
Talk:A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism/Archive 1

message: As reported at Creation and evolution in public education#Recent developments in state education programs, proponents still seem to be presenting this list to school boards. Why don't they listen to the DI saying they don't want ID taught in schools?..... dave souza, talk 19:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is the wedge strategy in action. What has happened is that a lot of confusion has been injected by the DI into the public sphere. What the DI runs is really just a series of public relation campaigns. I think that the DI is probably torn. Some of them want to wait to introduce ID into the schools, and some clearly are pushing for it right away, because of their actions. This is where Wikipedia can help out. We have to make the information about the ID and the DI readily available here so that these school board members and the public can make more reasonable decisions, and that the defenders of evolution can arm themselves with more accurate material.--Filll 19:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's true that we're here to inform, but don't exaggerate our importance. It's pretty clear from News Release, Science textbook statement from School Board Chair Thomas J. Doland, that he and presumably the board would love to teach the controversy, and are instructing their officials to try to find a controversy to teach, but as Evolution vs. Intelligent Design: Chesterfield School Board takes up debate on different theories of life makes clear with  [the superintendent was] "asked to ensure teachers are aware of federal laws regarding any discussions of religion in the classroom. Currently, any discussions of creationism or intelligent design must be raised by students – not teachers – and teachers must remain neutral on the topic." that they're painfully aware of the Kitzmiller judgement... dave souza, talk 22:23, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, but these days EVERYONE goes to the internet and Wikipedia to understand these issues. And so we can actually play a useful role.--Filll 23:39, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chesterfield County Public Schools
Talk:Portuguese Sheepdog

message: Editor 194.65.5.235 (we can't contact you if you are just a number!) placed this note in the See also section-
The serra de aires name came from an farm near Estremoz, Alentejo where the breed was originated  
No such reference is found on the Portugese breed club website (http://www.cpcsa.net/paginas/cao.htm), I looked all through it. It does seem that the dog is more associated with the Alentejo though. Please provide a reference!--Hafwyn (talk) 20:09, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Farm? 
Talk:Mihajlo D. Mesarovic

message: Due to possible violation of copyright, see WP:Copyvio, I have removed the worksection of this article for now. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 09:03, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worksection removed 
Talk:Imaginext

message: Advertising in NOT my intention.  I've worked on a couple of other pages for toys that are brands of Fisher-Price and I felt this line of toys needed a page.  Can you please explain what I might be able to do to remove the tag and make the article more credible? David M. Sharp 18:38, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:PanzerArmee Afrika (board game)

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support clearly the real subject should be primary, not the board game based off it. 70.49.124.225 (talk) 02:51, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey