lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nymphaea nouchali var. caerulea

message: In the text it remains unclear what type of fruit this species produces. First it is stated "The fruit are berries," in the section "Description". Further down in the section "Ecology" it is stated: "The fruit suddenly bursts when ripe, and the scattered seed float away. The seed soon sinks." which is a contradiction. Berries are indehiscent, whereas the latter text section states the fruit is dehiscent, so it cannot be a berry. If the latter were true, I believe it were correct to describe it as a fleshy capsule instead. Conan Wolff (talk) 06:41, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency of fruit type 

message: Project topic 117.233.119.250 (talk) 12:22, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  5 Aquatic plants photo and information 

message: “Apomorphine and nuciferine, which are responsible for psychoactive effects of the blue lotus flower”
https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/28/20/7014 2600:100C:B016:1AC4:3C5D:F23:E922:9DC4 (talk) 09:31, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worth adding
Talk:DMZ host

message: As this is a pseudo-implementation of a technology for which there is a page, and I don't think it could ever be expanded beyond a stub, I suggest it's merged with DMZ.
Elomis 02:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done it, see Demilitarized zone (computing). --- Kpavery (talk | contribs) 06:58, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Statics

message: i wanted to include a non technical definition of statics for people who have no background in physics so they can easily understand what statics is about. i think saying stuff like statics is about structures or statics is where the sum of the forces and moments equal zero or anything like that doesn't really make a whole lot of sense to ordinary people. saying something like 'statics is the branch of engineering that deals with  how a load or loads applied to any sort of structure it can be figured out how it is transfered from where it is being applied to where it is being supported.' i wish anyone who edits who doesn't like it would consider improving it rather than removing it and try to keep it in simple terms that is easy for anyone to understand.
Umeeguy (talk) 04:52, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Korg MS2000

message: Some of the criticism is fair, but in its current form, hardly NPOV.  Can anyone add links and citations on the subjective qualities, eg: limitations on polyphony, "thinness" of tone...
58.107.192.12 02:16, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

message: There's a picture in this article that claims to be of a MS2000B. However, it's clearly just a picture of an MS2000 that has been modified to appear black. The object in the picture lacks the microphone input and still is labeled "MS2000" (Real MS2000Bs are actually labelled as such).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.231.38.36 (talk) 03:46, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  MS2000B picture is fake
Talk:List of women philosophers

message: some of the people on this list may not be philosophers, is there a standard for inclusion that differentiates philosophers from literary writers?  --Buridan 02:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: standard for inclusion

message: let's keep in mind, that the routledge book does not actually define rand as a philosopher as reported in other discussions.  does anyone have a copy of that book to look up her entry?--Buridan 13:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a copy and she isn't defined as a philosopher therein.  But this list says nothing about anyone being defined as anything.  Surely some people have called her a philosopher, and that is enough.  There are so few female role models in philosophy that we shouldn't be trying to eliminate any of the few that have made themselves visible. KSchutte 20:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That statement is complete POV. If she is not a philosopher, she shouldn't be on the list. Your agenda is clear ("there are so few female role models...") 64.236.80.62 (talk) 18:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  routledge 

message: We must be gender blind or the mobs will get us.  Merge this category with philosophers OR FACE THE WRATH OF THE MOB!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.173.21.154 (talk) 19:33, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Violating Gender Neutrality 

message: As a woman, educated but without coursework in philosophy per se, I am so grateful to have discovered this list of Women philosophers! The work I've done since my doctorate has been very existential in its focus, but calling myself a philosopher seemed somehow inappropriate, especially with no female role models I could relate to. Otoh, this definition from Philosopher really does describe me well:
"In the classical sense, a philosopher is someone who lives according to a way of life, whose focus is upon resolving existential questions about the human condition."
There's a remarkable graphic novel style book called "Action Philosophers" that I highly recommend for fun and a good introduction to the famous male philosophers of history. Only woman included is Ayn Rand, not one of the people I can identify with.
This list makes it a whole lot easier. Would having it sorted by date, below the alphasort, be possible? Reviewing their pages based on their point in history will be very educational.
Thank you again! DrMel (talk) 18:21, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thank You So Much! Could we also include a list by era?  

message: — Assignment last updated by Shaykip (talk) 02:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Feminist Philosophy
Talk:George Atwood

message: This article is missing the subject's date of birth. If anyone who has researched the subject is relatively sure that the date of birth is not within the corpus of human knowledge, please change the category to "Date of birth unknown". Otherwise, please leave this editorial category in place so that someone may research the matter in the future. Erechtheus 02:22, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth missing 
Talk:Kaakha Kaakha

message: Richard asr (talk) 20:18, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedited
Talk:Dartmouth Jack-O-Lantern

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 19:08, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
* Support. Seems to be a no-brainer. The article's link to the Jack-O-Lantern website speaks volumes and I'm mystified as to why we've come to even need a discussion/vote on this. —ExplorerCDT 02:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Northern Premier League Premier Division

message: I feel that we should not include the current league table here as the information changes almost every week. Any comments about this would be appreciated. --Siva1979Talk to me 02:24, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed it back to the list of current clubs. If anyone really wants to know the league standings, they can go to the official site. --Stevefarrell 15:53, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete
Talk:Soul Patrol (fandom)

message: I found this reference  to the Soul Patrol Members, but I'm not sure how to put it in to the article. Help! Tennis Dynamite 02:31, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry. 

message: This topic isn't notable enough for its own article (see WP:Notability) and the section in Taylor Hicks is of better quality and has more information, anyways. Isuggest that it be merged and redirected. Tennis DyNamiTe (sign in) 21:30, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Anglican Communion Network

message: To claim that a belief in biblical infallibility or certain views on sexual morality is "traditional" or "orthodox," as the article claimed, is a point of view.  A quick scan of Article VI of the Thirty-Nine Articles, delineating the interpretation of scripture, does not suggest that scripture is infallible - a claim explicitly rejected by Richard Hooker himself, incidentally; and orthodoxy or tradition with respect to ethical questions depends on whether one is looking at them as discrete issues, or in terms of doctrinal methodology.  An argument could be made (and often is) that the blessing of same-sex unions or ordination/consecration of non-celibate individuals is entirely consistent with traditional, orthodox, Anglican doctrinal development. fishhead64 (talk) 06:48, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Traditional," "orthodox"

message: Does this organization still exist? The link to its website now goes to the Anglican Church in North America's website. Ltwin (talk) 00:22, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Current status of this organization
Talk:Megaforce

message: Will Megaforce ever come out on DVD? — rglovejoy 6 Sep 2006, 22:49 EST
honestly, Team america world police was essentially completely based off the thunderbirds.  the base, the vehicles, the animation (obviously), everything.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.177.16.146 (talk) 22:02, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

message: The 21:07, 12 April 2021 edit was me. LordApofisu (talk) 22:02, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forgot to login
Talk:Bobby Pearce (rower)

message: A citation is needed for the reference to the exclusion from the Diamond Sculls.  I have checked in two different histories of the regatta (Richard Burnell and Chris Dodd) and can't find a reference - but that's not to say it didn't happen.  I have however removed the reference in articles about John B. Kelly, Sr. and Henley Royal Regatta until a citation can be found (I've been cleaning up/correcting/adding citations to the references to the amateurism issue in those articles.
In the meantime, I will make a small amendment to this article, removing the reference to 'gentry' and adding detail on the amateurism rules which were in place at Henley in 1928.
I'll also add some detail about the 1931 Diamonds win that I have found.
James of Putney 00:05, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diamond Sculls 

message: Under "World champion professional", there are contradicting information on Pearce's wife. First it was stated that "In 1938, he defeated Evans Paddon of Australia in a three-mile race during the Canadian National Exhibition in Toronto where his world sculling title was at stake. The race took place just a few days after Pearce's wife died following an illness." Then it was stated that "Pearce's wife lived longer than him, dying in 2007."
So did his wife die before or after him? Some wiki contributors may want to correct the article..or make it clearer.
110.92.100.83 (talk) 07:03, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Both. His first wife Reita Hendon died in 1938; his second wife Velma Whelpton outlived him. Sticks66 08:36, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pearce's wife 

message: I removed what appeared to be uncited OR trivia from a section in which it wasn't even relevant. I also couldn't find a source that Michel was his grandson, and thus at least part of it might constitute vandalism. If you can find references for all of this, don't restore it to that specific section. Quinto Simmaco (talk) 02:28, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Family
Talk:Gräf & Stift

message: ... a well-known manufacturer of luxury automobiles, including the one that famously took part in the Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand.
:The automobile didn't "take part in" the fateful assassination because cars are machines, not sentient beings. Revised to "carried Archduke Franz Ferdinand ... when he was assasinated," etc. Sca (talk) 13:33, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Anthropomorphism
Talk:XML Metadata Interchange

message: "However it brings XMI closer to idiomatic XML usage, but is unfortunately very rarely supported by modeling tools. The lack of good XMI support is slightly incomprehensible, since it is not a particularly complicated standard to adhere to. Then again good interoperability might not be in the best interest of the tool vendors themselves due to "vendor lock-in"."
Since there's no reference for the grossly POV statement above, I'm going to remove it. Bihal 02:37, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Would be nice to know how EMF relates to XMI. I think this is an important issue. --141.76.176.79 14:28, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eclipse Modeling Framework 

message: Why can't we have a simple example to make this thing comprehensible? Kallerdis (talk) 18:47, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is incomprehensible 

message: OWL is used to express the structure and content of ontologies: it does what it does reasonably well. As a tool to represent concepts now expressed in UML (classes, relationships, sequences, activities) it would be a complete mismatch - like trying to eat watery soup with a fork and knife.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prakash Nadkarni (talk • contribs) 23:08, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OWL works fine to represent UML-like concepts. Although I'd agree that OWL isn't a metadata standard (and will people please stop calling RDF a metadata format), that UML usage isn't metadata. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:31, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  OWL: A Metadata standard?? 

message: Does anyone else enjoy the irony of an article about metadata interchange that is so lacking in citations? LeadSongDog come howl! 15:40, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irony
Talk:Mission San Juan Bautista

message: This discussion has been moved to Talk:Spanish missions in California. Mdhennessey (talk) 06:36, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the prehistory of the native American peoples? 

message: In San Juan Bautista, San Benito County, California, there is a Spanish Mission called San Juan Bautista. The mission has six statues of saints on its altar, one of which was missing for some time, until a man from another state returned it, having purchased it at a sale. The missing statue was of St. Anthony, the patron saint for the recovery of lost items.
this was added today to the St Anthony article. If a reference can be found it may be added here. Hafspajen (talk) 13:04, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Added
Talk:Technical director

message: I notice that there is a section of this article that says some TV shows do not have technical directors (for example iCarly and Wizards of Waverly Place). Well, I am here to prove that person wrong! If you watch the credits carefully at the end, you will see that it clearly includes a "Technical Director" credited. Curvebill (talk) 20:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  This section was removed and replaced with a more generic description of situations where the TD is not usually present. --Thomprod (talk) 16:28, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflicting reports
Talk:Peter Venkman

message: Should I put up a picture? Also, why is it so short!?--suit-n-tie 02:45, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because I just wrote it.  Actually, I just rescued it from redirect hell.  All the Ghostbuster characters were just redirects to the main Ghostbusters page, so I made individual articles for each (I havent gotten to Winston Zeddemore yet) and added a general description of the character.  I started it and hopefully someone can expand it.  Wavy G 04:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, but what about a picture?--suit-n-tie 03:17, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

text: There shouldn't really be any quotes, should there? Unless they're written as part of the article and given context, I mean. Quotes are what Wikiquote is for, really.--Joseph Q Publique 03:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The movie magazine Empire named him one of the greatest movie characters of all time. Worth a mention?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.89.108.51 (talk) 15:24, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Empire 

message: The Ghostbusters franchise and its characters are more memorable to me (and large part of my generation) than Superman. How come the notability of the characters featured is in doubt? I strongly feel that, if any manga character is acceptable, the Ghostbusters should be as well. Mfhulskemper (talk) 20:15, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Notability is determined by coverage of the character themselves in reliable, third-party sources as demonstrated in the article, not the franchise, media type, etc. This article currently is purely plot and unsourced claims, showing no notability. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 22:13, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: The entry is really, really badly written (not so much in the first sections, but it becomes embarrassingly bad in the Appearances section). Large parts should be deleted or rewritten. 151.35.128.253 (talk) 10:27, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality of entry
Talk:John Folse

message: Chef John Folse was born on the Acadian Coast not German Coast
St. James Parish is the Acadian and St. Charles and St. John is the German Coast.
Thanks, 
Theron Oubre  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.131.83.219 (talk) 00:50, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

message: I know it still needs sources, but I will have those shortly. NawlinWiki 02:47, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have made changes and new additions to John Folse page. We, at Chef John Folse & Co., own all necessary "copyright" for all items listed. All information posted here are facts, no bias opinions. All information can be backed up with hard evidence. Upon request, all trophies, awards and photos can be submitted as proof.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danlingg (talk • contribs) 15:14, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change on John Folse
Talk:Technical week

message: :Hell Week:
Looks like there's a bit of an edit war going on over the term "Hell Week".  Let's discuss it, rather than reverting each other blindly, no?  If there's a citation, cool.  But I don't see one.  Bryson430 (talk) 07:19, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

message: From page as of 18:37, 22 December 2014:
:Technical week (also called tech week, tech, torture week, techweek, production week or hell week)
This needed a citation, specifically one that is not biased.
Enzanki ars (talk) 14:45, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also Called
Talk:Juan Diego (actor)

message: Don't delete Actor-stub, this man is an actor, maybe even more importantly than being a film actor. Bejnar 02:49, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Actor on stage as well as film actor

message: On 27 January 2007, Javier de la vega edited the article Juan Diego (actor) changing his full name from "Juan Diego Ruíz Montero" to "Juan Diego Ruíz Moreno", without  citation.  The reliable site Nuestrocine in their entry for Juan Diego lists his name as "Montero".  Some people might consider "Moreno" an insult as not having pure blood.  I notice that Javier de la vega also changed the name on the Spanish Wikipedia. I do note that some sites have Juan Diego listed as Moreno, but I could not find any that were authoritative.  Google had 216 hits for "Juan Diego Ruíz Montero" and only 46 for "Juan Diego Ruíz Moreno".   Unless someone comes up with an authoritative source, I will change his name back to Montero. --Bejnar 23:59, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed it back. --Bejnar (talk) 23:15, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

text: On 14 July 2012 Dviaje changed the name from "Montero" to "Moreno" without any citation or edit summary.  I have change it back, per above. See also his bio at Buscabiografias. --Bejnar (talk) 00:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Full name
Template talk:James Bond characters

message: This template was put up for deletion.  See Log The result of the debate was KEEP. 
Why Official?  Are there any unofficial James Bond film characters? -- I@n 02:50, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All the characters in the Danjaq films are considered official. Never Say Never Again and the original Peter Sellers Casino Royale are considered unofficial. Andymarczak 07:28, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm wondering that too, we're discussion that at Talk:James Bond. Cbrown1023 18:19, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

message: The new layout for this template is very confusing in that it splits all the characters between the books and the movies (which makes no sense since the character lists under the novels section just leads to the lists from the movies.) Whoever made that obviously has no idea on a to make a straightfoward template that someone could follow. Please change it back to the normal list, NOT splitting them up between the books and the movies. Donco (talk) 22:21, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Layout 

message: The list of James Bond henchmen in The Man with the Golden Gun contains no characters at all from the novel, so this list should be listed in the "by film" section not the "by novel" section. I'm moving it accordingly. Opera hat (talk) 12:47, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henchmen
Talk:Juan Lavalle

message: I think that in an attempt to be "fair" important information is left behind, because it is detrimental to the subject of the biography. Come on, calling him "statesman" is really pushing it. Rebelling against the legitimate goverment, and ruling by terror until kicked out does not make you a statesman. I know, it was lucky for his reputation that the guy who followed him (Rosas) also believed in ruling by terror, though he was more adroit at it, but still...
It is easy to feel sympathy for him, because he was an egregious victim of the Peter Principle, and those always deserve our sympathy. Also, his lasts months were too much like some tango lyrics, thus awakening the sentimentality that those always evoke. But I do not think that you can make a hero out of tht material.
Adriana Pena  
(who once tried to write a story based on the Sabato version and each time she did,her subsconscious kept dredging up Norman Bates,- so she had to figure out why it was so.)
..............
I changed "statesman" to "political figure" as a more accurate description.
:Fair enough. Mariano(t/c) 11:39, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Lavalle was not the 4th (or any other) President of Argentina.  What reliable source says so?  At most, he governed the Province of Buenos Aires.  Other provinces did not recognise him.  Ttocserp 19:13, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  4th president? 

message: I think it'd be good to add a little bit more information on the introduction paragraph. Who he is, what he did, why he's important.
Maybe something like:Juan Galo Lavalle (17 October 1797 – 9 October 1841) was an Argentine military and political figure. He served as an military general during multiple wars of independence and civil wars. Lavalle served as the Governor of Buenos Aires Province as a Unitarian. To many, Lavalle was seen as rash or illegitimate. Coulomb1 (talk) 23:23, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding on introduction paragraph
Talk:Folkestone Invicta F.C.

message: British English should be used for articles on Britain related topics. Likewise, American English should be used on articles pertaining to American topics. For a clearer example, please visit this sub-section on the differences between their usage. --Siva1979Talk to me 02:54, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A note on British English 

message: Should probably be divided up into a few sub sections, perhaps by years? Beaver Patrol 19:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  history section 

message: Almost the entirety of the history section is a copyvio from the official club website ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:28, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation