lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rank (botany)

message: What about superclasses -- are they obsoleted? ~~
:No, they are available for use by a taxonomist. They are just not explicitly mentioned in the ICBN as are unnumbered other ranks. Brya 17:30, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Basically I'm asking that some botanically competent person create an article at Section (botany) and eliminate this unhelpful redirect. 68.123.141.240 18:52, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: =

message: Section (botany) redirects here. It's not mentioned in this page. Furthermore it's not an analogue to the concept of "rank" that's described here. A section isn't a subfamily, because subfamilies contain distinct genera. But sections are groups of species within a genus (see fagaceae and nothofagaceae). So a section isn't a rank at all, at least not in all cases. 68.123.141.240 18:51, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Basically I'm asking that some botanically competent person create an article at Section (botany) and eliminate this unhelpful redirect. 68.123.141.240 18:52, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Section" seems special, deserves its own explanation?
Talk:Jersey cattle

message: The conversions of weight from pounds to kg are inconsistent -ie 1000 pounds was converted using a different formula to the 1200 pounds.  I do not know what the correct formula is, so cannot change it.
Using this reference:
http://www.ansi.okstate.edu/breeds/cattle/jersey/
The cows weigh from 800 lbs to 1200 lbs. The bulls weigh from 1200 lbs to 1800 lbs. I'll put these figures and their metric equivalents into the article. RPellessier | Talk 06:56, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now uses  Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 13:20, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Conversion?

message: "but by some measures it produces more milk per unit of body weight than any other breed" this is also claimed to be the case in the article Guernsey cattle. Neither of these claims are cited in either article and I have not come across any evidence that to support either claim. Any ideas? Blacknightshade 02:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Got milk?

message: I've tidied up some of the wording, as since 2008, the import ban no longer holds for semen of any kind, so the earlier wording in the history no longer made any sense.
--TonyinJersey (talk) 10:20, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adjustments 

message: I work with Jersey cows on a daily basis, and I can personally vouch for the claims made in this article that they are more docile than other breeds, and highly recommended for first-time owners and marginal pasture. However, I can't say that I agree with the claim about them being more nervous than other breeds, and what I just wrote, and most of what is written in the article, is not properly sourced. Does anybody who has the time to do such a thing care to find sources for that information? 174.124.69.245 (talk) 23:16, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Temperment

message: The page of the "Miniature Jersey Association" itself makes it clear that these are simply original Jersey cattle under a new name. There's nothing to suggest that this is a distinct breed – it's not reported to DAD-IS, not mentioned in Mason's World Encyclopedia of Livestock Breeds and Breeding (sixth edition). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Miniature Jersey cattle]]
Talk:John Rigby (company)

message: As far as I know the .275 Rigby is a copy of the 7x57 Mauser, not developed by Rigby. 83.248.24.253 23:55, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He probably means that the .275 Rigby is a copy of the 7x57 Mauser  62.20.172.166 20:36, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headline text 

message: We appear to have two articles on the same topic. They should be merged. See John Rigby & Company. Arthurrh 09:40, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[John Rigby & Company]]
Talk:Small-angle approximation

message: i agree that it shold be merged 67.82.226.68 9:55, 13 March 2006
These articles should not be merged. The small angle formula is a special case of the small angle approximation, but the are used in different contexts.Smeapancol 10:00, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merging two articles does not mean they describe exactly the same thing, it just means their (possibly different) subjects could be better presented as a single article because they have so much in common. —Keenan Pepper 15:29, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is possible to merge if you create a section in "approximation" article called --Application in Astronomy-- and just copy-paste "formula" article there. --Alextalk 02:57, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: I believe for flow and resolved understanding of the reasoning behind the approximation of a small angle.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matrixology7 (talk • contribs) 18:20, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Taylor Series Derivation Example

message: Angle 2001:4456:1C8:1A00:1552:F4D9:882B:EC0F (talk) 06:40, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Approximate value and angle 

message: These are normally referred to in the plural as the small-angle approximations, and the article itself does that. I don't think this is a case where a singular title reflects the WP:COMMONNAME. (It took me several tries to successfully link here because of that.)
The article isn't about what "a small-angle approximation" is; it's about what a specific collection of formulae known as the small-angle approximations are.
Musiconeologist (talk) 22:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Culpeper County High School

message: Victuallers 18:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Scale length

message: This is really where the article at Scale (string instruments) belongs IMO, but I don't think the naming of the article is all that important just so long as this redirects there.
There was a previous, speedily deleted version reading
hello. i am writing about scale lenth. i dnt have a clue what it is. so just ignore me! ahahahahahahaahah........mwhahahahahahaahahahaha. neesha!
and created by an anon who at the date of writing has no surviving edits. Andrewa 23:57, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The claim on this page that either of the physics concepts are also known by this title is not borne out by either of those articles, nor the sources on them. As such, the claim is OR, and not appropriate for the basis of a disambiguation page. I recommend that this page be deleted (or moved to scale length (disambiguation)) and the musical instruments page, the only one with the actual title and the only one to actually use the term, be moved here. oknazevad (talk) 03:25, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unneeded?
Talk:Fraser Valley Distance Education School

message: On Wikipedia, this school is also known as Fraser Valley Distance Education or FVDES.
----
princably: mccey mic farts alot is a great princable  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.78.168.181 (talk) 22:35, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk Page for Fraser Valley Distance Education School (FVDES)
Talk:Minffordd railway station

message: With great respect for the work Noel has done, not only here on the wiki, but in other publication, I must take to task the One F Not Two discussion.
For much of its life, including its act of Parliament, it is referred to as the Festiniog Railway Company.  It was only in the 1980's(?) the welsh version of Ffestiniog started to become used, although the company name still hasnt changed.
The Society Magazine did not adopt the double Ff use until 1994, issue 145 and also use of the welsh translation, whilst the Heritage group still uses the single F version as of 15th Dec 
2007
In respect of this I have amended some FF / F usage on this page
--Keith 18:45, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  One F not Two 

message: The use of the word interchsange is misleading here, as it was used in declaring it a single station.   
The  two  stations are completely independant in ownership and operation.  Whereas Arriva Wales, as the present incumbant standard gauge operator, only has custodial ownership of its station until it loses its franchise, the FR has owned and operated its station for 130 years plus.
Neither body has any responsiblity for the management or maintainance of the others station.
--Keith 18:54, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interchange
Category talk:Pages actively undergoing construction

message: I'm trying to be a better Wikipedian, which is why I added this page to my watchlist, but is this whole thing necessary? The Template really seems very ambiguous to me, most of the articles don't even have a real comment on a talk page to explain just what needs to be done. Wouldn't the clean-up template or stub template be better? Dessydes 00:03, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, some editors have started using this template to keep really awful articles from being deleted. It would be wonderful if there was a way (like the prod template) to see which articles have been tagged with this for more than, say, 10 days. --Fabrictramp 18:39, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this necessary?
Talk:Antarctic fur seal

message: "each Antarctic Fur seal eats about a ton", which ton would that be? A Long ton, Short ton or Tonne (metric ton)? CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 11:26, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Eating
Talk:Żabbar

message: I removed this from the articel, at the very edit: "For more history contact John Camilleri on (number deleted).". 68.39.174.238 00:10, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Certified Novell Engineer

message: This article seems to be minimalist, have too much opinion, and not enough facts and details.
Will continue to try and expand this.  The Certified Netware Administrator article should be considered in tandem with changes to this article, though it is considerably cleaner than this one. <SPAN STYLE="font-family:monospace; color:#006666; background-color:#ffff99; border-color:#ff0000; border-width:1px; border-style:solid; "> DavidDouthitt </SPAN> (Talk) 00:14, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs cleanup 

message: In the "Recognition" section, the following words are unitelligible: "Microsoft certs suffered from the 'Brain Dump' test answer posting mentality of MCSE candidates possible belief in Microsoft overall."98.110.35.110 (talk) 23:37, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Gibberish
Talk:Ike Barinholtz

message: I changed the presentation of the impressions list to be in two columns, as I found the huge amount of whitespace to be ugly. I know this is frowned upon by some, so if there's a consensus that it should be reverted then please do so. Ciotog 13:06, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Impressions in columns

message: Maybe a photo would jog someone's memory. Landroo (talk) 14:08, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is this person? 

message: Have any of you actually reads this? "Radloff, Jessica. "Ike Barinholtz From The Mindy Project Talks Chris Messina, Mindy Kaling, and Marriage". Glamour. Retrieved 2016-05-23." Or just skimmed through it like you do with most things?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.224.199.52 (talk) 08:59, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Have any of you actually read it?
Talk:John Smith (sergeant)

message: John Smith is certainly a common name!
A different John Smith (private), was awarded the VC, also for action in India:
http://www.royaldublinfusiliers.com/vc/vc.html
Somebody more knowledgeable than me should straighten this out.
Clemwang 22:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A different John Smith VC 
Talk:Brake lining

message: I'd like to see a discussion of modern brake lining materials.  There are no specific examples in either disc brake, brake_lining, or clutch, just references to the fact that Asbestos was previously used and now there are new, but unnamed substances used.  What are those?  What allows them to hold together under extraordinary heat and pressure?  Any materials scientists out there?
:One lead might be Silicon_carbide#Disc_brake, though the linked reinforced carbon-carbon article has no mention of disk brakes. DFH 16:36, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Surprisingly, the website for Ferodo doesn't seem to delve into materials at all. DFH 16:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ferodo "invests £multimillions on research projects each year, with vast numbers of scientists and engineers working to advance the worlds knowledge and understanding of friction technology." The words trade secret come to mind. DFH 16:44, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

message: The article states asbestos brake linings ended in 2003, but this (undated) article suggests that might not be the case. Can we get support for the 2003 assertion? —Scheinwerfermann T·C02:46, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with your edit and your reasoning for it, but I wish you would please add this good source to the article as a reference instead of just pointing at it here on the talk page. —Scheinwerfermann T·C15:57, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asbestos 

message: The regular material being used in the manufacturing of ferrodo disc brake pads is dangerous to heart functioning it disrupts the normal rate of heart pumping blood to sections of body tissue.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.73.247.124 (talk) 19:36, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  disc brake pads ferrodo 
Talk:History of Galicia

message: Come on, just look at it.
172.162.193.193 (talk) 22:55, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Modern Age?

message: I have to say that I Chose to write "an Asturian nobleman" at the fist time mainly because there's no Contemporary sources about Pelayo, and as far I know all The Christian Sources are dated between The X's and The XI's Century, the Muslim Sources at the other hand try to diminish the role and the origin of Pelayo.
This lack of objective sources generated a lot of doubts about the true origin of Pelayo, in matter of facts there is a lot Sources that indicated that he has an Asturian, Galician, or even a Cantabrian origin. At the Other hand we have an well known legend about a his Visigothic origin justified 'cause in that case the Asturian Kingdom represent the continuity of the Visigothic Kingdom.
For that reason I chose to write "an Asturian nobleman" because that is a real fact, he created the noble house of the Asturian Kingdom and He is "per se" an Asturian nobleman. Jfreyre 00:22, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How can the founder of an Asturian principality already be an "Asturian" and a "an Asturian nobleman" at that? If Pelayo was a nobleman—and any Asturian enthusiast will vehemently agree—what is he a nobleman of? "Pelayo was a nobleman of high birth in the Visigothic kingdom that held power in Hispania..." begins the Wikipedia article on Pelayo, and that is accurate. This is a combination of basic logic and the level of history one has to master in order to advance to eighth grade. This is a thoughtless waste of my time. Just stop it. --Wetman 08:30, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pelayo

message: Shouldn't this be renamed to History of Spanish Galicia or History of Galicia (Spain)? As you can see, the Galicia_%28Central_Europe%29#History is long enough to deserve its own subarticle about history, so History of Galicia should be a disambig.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 01:42, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: - Well, I have to say that the section of Middle Age in Galicia is too brief, and deserves an expansion. We only have a few lines by now. Reconquista is very important in the history of all Spain, since it made the frame for its History. But in Galicia we only can read that "the Muslims never took real control of Galicia - Northern Iberia" and a few rebelions against them or against other Christian kingdoms. Spacially, i would love to know whether there were battles of the Reconquista in Galicia, since these battles were so important in the History of Spain. We have very little information of the period 711-1000, as it is written today. thankyou.95.122.167.147 (talk) 20:48, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reconquista in Galicia
Talk:List of mountains on Mars by height

message: I've now added references to the volcanoes here. Some heights were revised quite heavily, e.g. Arsia Mons almost doubling from 9 km to 16 km. This may be because the former height was relative to the surroundings, while the latter I used is absolute, and relative only to the martian datum ("elevation 0"). That's the only explanation I have for the large difference from my sources anyway. I tried to list only heights relative to the datum for consequence. It's unfortunate that many sites only seem to listen one of either, and it can sometimes be hard to figure out which kind of "height" they mean. If you add relative heights, I recommend that 1) all other data need to change, or 2) add to a new column or find another solution to notify the reader of this. -- Jugalator 00:22, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Heights and referencing

message: Unyet Mount Everest *IS* in this list which for those of you who don't know, is located on planet Earth which is the 3rd planet from the Sun (has no official name) not the 4th!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.141.125.203 (talk) 21:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Mountains on Mars by height????????????????

message: Since these elevations are all (allegedly) given as height to the martian datum, I'd advocate just removing the comparative values from other planets. The values aren't comparable, by definition, and putting them in just encourages people to do this. DanHobley (talk) 19:01, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Relevance of having terrestrial and venusian values in the table

message: I think this table should add height from base to summit, as it is already using that for the comparison Mauna Loa. Also, since the datums of different planets aren't really comparable, we should have figures related to the reference ellipsoid and geoids as well. -- 70.24.244.158 (talk) 15:56, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Height from base to summit
Talk:Scharnhorst effect

message: Ati3414 added a link to his paper again, despite the fact that his musings on phase and group velocity are not related to this effect. The Scharnhorst efect is a quantum mechanical effect in which the vaccuum modes are less dense in one direction and therefore the light actually would travel faster in that direction.  Trying to argue this away with classical mechanics arguements, not even taking the time to understand the physics here, and worst of all the self promotion ... must be stopped.  Ati3414 I'd appreciate it if you stopped spamming your papers all over the physics topics.  Thank you. Gregory9 00:26, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you saying that there is no phase and group velocity in quantum mechanics? Remind that we must find the classical physics at different scale, no?Klinfran (talk) 19:58, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments by Gregory9

message: Can anybody put some dates into this article, please? Even approximate dates would be useful. I have no idea when any of the events discussed in the article happened. New Thought (talk) 09:47, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: I've placed a hidden box around this since this does not deal with anything in the article, but rather a continuation of the WP:ESCA debates. It's very distracting, especially to newcomers, and the discussion reached a stalemate anyway. Let's get back to discussing how to improving the article rather than discussing how to discuss improving the article. Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 18:13, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any objection to adding the ESCA template? 

message: As noted towards the end of the article in its present form, various people have written papers demonstrating or arguing that the Scharnhorst et al results cannot be used to send superluminal signals. I note that my own paper is not mentioned, although it was among the earliest (SLAC-PUB-5300, July 1990, "Causality Between Conducting Plates" ; published in Physics Letters that October). A citation search will reveal that this paper has been referred to extensively. It is unethical for me to modify the article to refer to my own work, but I encourage anyone else to do so.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PhyzxShahar (talk • contribs) 21:32, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest someone add a reference to my own early work
Talk:Reference class problem

message: The "Reference class problem" is mostly spoken of in relation to the frequentist interpretation of probability, though it is now recognised that some form of the problem relates to all the major probability interpretations. See:   —Preceding unsigned comment added by KerryB (talk • contribs) 09:26, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

message: The first paragraph of this article needs to include the definition of the title of the article (e.g., "In statistics, the reference class problem..."). - dcljr (talk) 00:27, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Context
Talk:Starbase

message: the comment about starbase 515 seems to be Trek specific and not appropriate here. any references to starbases outside of Star Trek? 217.7.209.108 11:56, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: starbase 515

message: Why does the entry for the US Navy Supercarrier link here, despite it not being mentioned even once in the article?  74.69.21.12 21:18, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: supercarrier

message: Is the top bit about the program ending with the line "Check your state to see how you can get involved with the program" anything more than a commercial to round up candidates? I suggest commercials aren't really good for wikipedia and we remove it.
82.73.195.228 (talk) 10:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starbase program 

message: STARBASE is the name of an educational program sponsored by the Department of Defense.  Each state can have two STARBASE sites.  The program's goals are to teach science, mathematics, technology, and engineering to inner-city students in 5th grade.  The program works with classes from the public schools and provides an intensive, 5-day learning experience.  Check your state to see how you can get involved with the program.
I removed this text since it doesn't really seem to apply to this article. Would it be worthy of it's own article? - Dlrohrer2003 (talk) 00:32, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed text 
Talk:Bordeaux Wine Official Classification of 1855

message: The wine tastings should not be in this article. They can be linked to, but this is basically a discussion of a historic list, not some wine tastings. Justinc 00:30, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * To do : Create new wiki pages for the 11 Troisièmes Crus Chateaux with no current content. 
** DONE These pages now need some content
* To do : Create new wiki pages for the 6 Quatrièmes Crus Chateaux with no current content.
* To do : Create new wiki pages for the 11 Cinquièmes Crus Crus Chateaux with no current content.
Steve.Moulding 19:48, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agne...saw the new pages you've created...great work!! Steve.Moulding 13:46, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Châteaux Project 

message: Should Château Dubignon aka Château Dubignon-Talbot be mentioned under 3. growth? With an attachment explaining the history (as with the other changes/exceptions)?--Nwinther (talk) 18:37, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Château Dubignon 
Talk:Bracer

message: This really smacks of POV, so I won't put it in the article, but for anybody who's wondering, if your bow is set up properly and you're not doing anything wrong (e.g. poor arm form, wearing baggy clothing), a bracer is totally unnecessary. — NRen2k5(TALK), 12:43, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue26/31/toc.html
©Geni (talk) 02:47, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: research that may be relevant