lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jacki MacDonald

message: Is the spelling of her name correct? I think it might be Jacqui McDonald, as has been used on IMBD and Daryl Somer's page, as well as Fairfax Newspapers? Please confirm?
203.18.241.226 06:45, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 
Talk:Jacob Rees-Mogg

message: I am concerned that criticism of Jacob Rees-Mogg has been removed without explanation, such as here and here. I freely admit I have a strong opinion on JRM, so that's why I think we should have a discussion about whether the removed text was appropriate or not, and also the reasons why. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:09, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I would also like to see what the reasons were for these removals. The lead section includes the claim that "He amassed a significant fortune: it was estimated in 2016 at between £55 million and £150 million, including his wife's expected inheritance." This needs to be covered in the main body of the article. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:10, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Is being wealthy a bad thing then? -- DeFacto (talk). 15:11, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Whether being wealthy is a bad or not is irrelevant. What is a "bad thing" is an article that makes two different claims, one in the lead section and one in the main body? Martinevans123 (talk) 15:16, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just that the heading here is 'criticism', so I wondered if you thought discussing his wealth was criticism of him. -- DeFacto (talk). 15:19, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The criticism arises not from him being wealthy as such, but rather from this privilege meaning he has no real idea of how most people live. Either way, the article ought to be accurate. Or perhaps you think £50 million is just an insignificant trifle? Martinevans123 (talk) 15:23, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What should the threshold of personal wealth be do you think, that if exceeded we could say that the person could not possibly have any real idea of how most people live? -- DeFacto (talk). 15:39, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's probably less than £150 million. But my personal views are also irrelevant. What are relevant are secondary sources detailing criticism of Rees-Mogg from notable individuals. And even if there were none of these, I'd suggest that his personal wealth should be reported accurately here. Perhaps we need a separate discussion thread on "Personal wealth"? Martinevans123 (talk) 15:46, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

text: The main body currently says just "in excess of £100 million". There seems to be some discrepancy with what appears in the lead section? The Spectator usefully tells us: Helena Anne Beatrix Wentworth Fitzwilliam de Chair, 45, born in 1977, is the daughter of famous poet and aristocrat Somerset de Chair and Lady Juliet Tadgell. Lady Tadgell (now aged 88) is heir to the Fitzwilliam fortune and has an estimated net worth of £45 million, all of which Helena stands to inherit as her only surviving child. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:54, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism
Talk:The Amalgamut

message: * http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/78159/filters-amalgamut-due-next-year
* http://www.blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?Mode=Search&searchtext=amalgamut&PageNum=2
* http://www.guitar.com/articles/10-questions-richard-patrick-filter
* http://www.guitar.com/articles/laughing-face-madness-%E2%80%93-filter-interview
* http://www.nuclearblast.com/en/music/band/about/71111.filter.html
* http://muldersprettyladynin.tripod.com/id21.html Sergecross73 msg me 16:15, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future Sources 

message: * http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/archive-news-oct-01-2001/ - Great source for info on this track, but since this isn't a song title on the final album, I still need to figure out if this was an alternative name, or one left off the album... Sergecross73 msg me 18:09, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The description given does not match any of the tracks on the album lyrically or stylistically, and most of the song titles were revealed well before release, so that eliminates the possibility of it being a different song (for example, it couldn't be "America Cliche" because he mentions that song by name in the same source). So I'm now assuming this is an unreleased track. Please tell me if there is a source stating otherwise. Sergecross73 msg me 17:59, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dont Give an Inch" 

message: * http://www.ink19.com/issues/january2003/interviews/filter.html - Good source to show perspective beside Patrick. Sergecross73 msg me 17:55, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steven Gillis Interview 
Talk:Jake Warren

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 07:10, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: ... is Jake Warren, but the article itself uses Jack and doesn't mention the name Jake. Should the article title be changed to Jack Hamilton Warren? --FeanorStar7 (talk) 20:23, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: article title
Talk:James J. Smith

message: I hit a bad link on this page, but I have not been able to yet get this sorted out.
Best I can tell, the link for 2004 is correct as a citation, but the first is problematic.  The URL which I was hitting was a bad page in ChinaTimes.
I will look outsite NYT now.
G. Robert Shiplett 23:37, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad link and NYT
Talk:James MacDonald (pastor)

message: In the preview for this page on Google, which shows up if someone googles "James MacDonald," it shows Pastor MacDonald's picture and infobox but links instead to James MacDonald (trade unionist) when clicked. I'm not sure if this is fixable by Wikipedia or only by Google, but I thought I should let someone here know just in case. - 2600:1702:3A0:A810:C073:CB46:11BC:FD2C (talk) 22:11, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't replicate this, so I assume it has been fixed somehow. – Fayenatic London 09:54, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect redirect 

message: Clearly there is a narrow line to be trod here about the raised, then withdrawn, lawsuit.  So contributors need to be very careful about what is added to the article and not violate Living Persons Biographies policy. Primary sources with allegations aren't good enough.  We need reliable third party coverage.   But equally, there is no justification for removing or obscuring facts about the case that are a matter of public knowledge in multiple reliable sources.  I'm concerned that a number of recent editors seem only concerned with doing this. 
Controversies are also better discussed within the body of the article, amonst other topics, rather than within separate sections.  That way they are more neutral, have better context, and the reader can assess the good with the bad more accurately.
--Escape Orbit (Talk) 15:31, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I've merged the controversy section upward to the Harvest Chapel section, since his alleged actions there were the basis of the controversy. Flapjacktastic (talk) 13:25, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: User:T.ruth3130 has just made a series of POV vandalism edits. They are inaccurate, blatantly slanted, and lacking any basis in the cited sources. I note that User:T.ruth3130 has been editing on Wikipedia since 2017 but has only ever edited pages related to MacDonald, Harvest Chapel, and associated topics. I have reverted the edits per WP:BLP. SunCrow (talk) 04:39, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV vandalism 

message: i enjoyed walk in the word. As God said those without  sin cast the first stone. 2603:7080:A402:92D0:C4AD:C634:DEF1:5821 (talk) 21:33, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  walk in the word 

message: Jerry Jenkins wrote a novel by the title of "I, Saul" and a "James S. MacDonald" is listed as a coauthor. I would assume this is the same person, but do not want to add it without verification. Wil492 (talk) 20:21, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I, Saul
Talk:Audi S3

message: This section is quite unencyclopedic in style and excessively digressive. It also doesn't sit well with the previous section. And why give an unsourced future date for the model's end of life? Letdorf 10:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: it also quotes two different 0-100km an hour times (well 60mph if your US) --60.224.133.149 06:18, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: anyone got an update to that speed? --58.161.112.75 10:38, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second generation (8P) section 

message: The Engine is capable of 265 bhp not 261 bhp as suggested, when the turbo boost is up to max output.
:Perhaps you're getting your bhp and Pferdestärke mixed up? The official Audi figure is 265 PS. Letdorf (talk) 17:58, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Performance metrics for cars are never an exact science, and "first hand evidence" is, of course, original research. IMHO, it's better to stick to manufacturers' official nominal figures, as these best fulfil the requirements of reliable sources. Letdorf (talk) 21:53, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  BHP 

message: Like Audi S2/Audi RS2, Audi S4/Audi RS4 and Audi S6/Audi RS6 and other 13 wikis , i will restore the separate page, who it was redirected to Audi A3  without any motivation or consensus (as similar a vandalism) ten years ago, to this stable version . If not opposing, will be next day/week with integration and update from other generation. 5.91.62.12 (talk) 09:25, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove redirect and restore the page
Talk:James Smith (boxer)

message: Nicknames of the adversaries should be not supplied. It makes the spreadhseet of the professional records sound unprofessional and cheap. Besides, no nicknames are provided in most wikipedia boxing records so this seems a quirk of this page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.34.130.251 (talk) 05:00, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Professional Record 
Talk:32nd United States Congress

message: *This article is COMPLETE and meets the current standard for this series of articles.
*suggestions for future improvements:
#supplemental Senate & House committees article
#supplemental district maps article
#narrative for major legislation
#narrative for major events
stilltim 04:02, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:James "Little Man" Stewart

message: There is a discussion going on about moving the James Stewart dab page to James Stewart (disambiguation) to make room for moving James Stewart (actor) to James Stewart on the basis that the American actor is the primary meaning of "James Stewart".  
That would mean anyone looking for the topic of this article (or any other "James Stewart") by searching for "James Stewart" would get sent to the article about the American actor rather than to the dab page.
The discussion is here.  --Born2cycle (talk) 20:06, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the American actor the primary use of the name, "James Stewart"?
Talk:Jamie Clarke (footballer, born 1982)

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Oppose as there are multiple Jamie Clarke articles. Jonathunder (talk) 12:51, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not adverse to the disam page (which I see has now been created). However, of the Jamie Clarkes other than this one on the page there's: a fictional character, a senator called James Clarke who the (rather crude) Google test suggests was never referred to as Jamie, and a non-notable headteacher of a school. I'd remove the latter two, which brings you back to my argument. HornetMike (talk) 16:23, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survey 
Talk:Allan Temko

message: Regarding the edit-summary - it can't be as large as 5 years unless it chanced to be January 1 to December 31.  And it's likely less than that.
This obit says that he lectured at the Sorbonne one year (1953-1954) and at the Ecole des Arts et Metiers one year (1954-1955).  
(Who's who of Pulitzer Prize winners By Elizabeth A. Brennan, Elizabeth C. Clarage, page 89).  Two years isn't "several" in any counting system yet devised. Tedickey (talk) 01:46, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  lectured for several years 
Talk:János Starker

message: Please add a photo----Design (talk) 10:11, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Starker's stature as a pedagogue and long teaching career meant that he has an extremely long list of famous students, many of them with Wikipedia pages of their own. I think it would be better if that monstrous paragraph were transformed into a separate article, like "Students of János Starker." Dunready (talk) 06:33, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of students
Talk:The Astral Factor

message: Astral Factor was an alternative title to the Invisible Strangler. Worth a cross reference from here? Hcobb (talk) 20:50, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invisible Strangler
Talk:Jared Rushton

message: Removed this on the basis that he co-starred against Tom Hanks in "Big" - Rushton is credited relatively late in the credits mainly because he was a child, however, he arguably played the second biggest part in the film after Hanks.  This is significant as "Big" is widely regarded as Hanks' first really good film. Halsteadk 20:42, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed for deletion - Dec 2006
Talk:New Ireland Forum

message: Nice work; thanks to User:Scolaire and User:Jtdirl! – Kaihsu 13:08, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is being referred to here ?  Gnevin (talk) 12:51, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This version of last October makes it clearer what is being referred to. There are plenty of references in Google Books. Reading Joanne McEvoy, I see that the press conference was in November 1984. This is the relevant page, therefore: search for "Question (Irish Television)"  -Scolaire (talk) 10:56, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Gnevin (talk) 22:05, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Out ,out ,out
Talk:Jay Stevens

message: Removed link from body of article as it goes to Rosencomet commercial cite.
Timmy12 19:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am NOT warring on this article, or any other. However, why is there a "citation needed" tag on a book that the subject co-authored, when the book is right there in the bibliography? It's published by a major press, ISBN numbers are supplied, and the authors are listed right there. What other "fact" is needed?Rosencomet (talk) 13:49, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Unsourced biographical stubs are given additional scrutiny on Wiipedia.  It's best to ignore the unsubstantiated personal attacks made by Qworty and focus only on supporting the content.  I'm available to help. Viriditas (talk) 06:45, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Accusation of Warring by Qworty
Talk:The Aviator (soundtrack)

message: I don't think that Martin Scorese wrote the soundtrack.  Can somebody correct this to Howard Shore?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Artaxus (talk • contribs) 02:56, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Composer
Talk:The Barbra Streisand Album

message: "A Taste of Honey" had coincidentally just been recorded an ocean away by those other icons of the 1960s for their 1963 debut album.
This line seems a little cutesy for an encyclopedia.  And it doesn't actually name the Beatles. 12.162.122.5 (talk) 21:24, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Beatles
Talk:Max Weber and German politics

message: I would like to see some references for that rather determined statement. There are visible left-wing sympathies that run through his work and public life so I'm not finding that claim sits well. Please elaborate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.66.27 (talk) 23:33, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weber "strongly anti-socialist" 

message: This entire page reads like a personal essay. Citing Mommsen at the end is insufficient. Further, it should be linked to the Max Weber page but since there are no inline citations, I would hate to do anything that would direct undergraduates here. :) Jellypear (talk) 00:46, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: This page needs inline references/references
Talk:Jerry Avorn

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://powerfulmedicines.org/pages/5/index.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:30, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Two paragraphs were still cut-and-paste versions of the Web site noted. I removed those. --Officiallyover (talk) 11:55, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Alvin S. White

message: Per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 March 21#Category:Missing middle or first names, :Category:Missing middle or first names has been added to this talk page.—DomBot / ChiDom talk 09:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add maintenance category 

message: Why is he described as an astronaut? Although a candidate as an astronaut, he didnt fly. Neither his X-15 flights or his X-70 flights were high enough to qualify. Viam Ferream (talk) 09:08, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Astronaut?
Talk:Jessica Lindell-Vikarby

message: I removed jessicalindellvikarby.com from External links, since the site hasn't been maintained.
Wayback Machine archives of the site until December 9, 2006, are at web.archive.org/web/*/jessicalindellvikarby.com.
The latest archive of the English version of the site, dated February 7, 2005,  is here.
--80.217.2.26 (talk) 12:55, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed unmaintained site JessicaLindellVikarby.com from ''External links'' 
Talk:Joseph Joestar

message: I have removed the speedy delete tag, as I don't see how this is a non-notable bio. If you don't feel this character is major enough to warrant his own page, I would reccommend you suggest a merge to the main article instead. If there is already enough there on him and you still don't feel this page is neccisary, an AfD is probably the way to go. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 17:38, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :OH MY GOD!. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 2#OH MY GOD! until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 16:54, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "OH MY GOD!" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Joseph is the best JoJo! 138.219.115.221 (talk) 01:02, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Your next line is...
Talk:A Beginners' Guide to the King Crimson Collectors' Club

message: "The Beginners' Guide to the King Crimson Collectors' Club" is the wrong title. The correct title is "A Beginners' Guide to the King Crimson Collectors' Club" (as it is on the album cover). Krzysztof 13 (talk) 12:56, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong title
Talk:Jimmie T. Roberts

message: J. Gordon Melton's Encyclopedia of American Religon (Seventh Edition), page 1131 gives his name as "Jimmie T. Roberts". I am going to move this article to that name and redirect "Jimmy T. Roberts" to the new name. If Melton is wrong and there are other RS references which show "Jimmy" is correct, then it can be moved back. If anyone does this, please cite the WP:RS and leave a redirect from "Jimmie".  • Astynax talk 01:54, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling for Roberts 

message: Roberts was reported found dead in December 2015.  A copy of the coroner's report is here: http://www.cultnews.com/2016/02/cult-leader-jim-roberts-dead-at-76/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.182.10.57 (talk) 19:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reported dead 

message: I removed the following from this article. While some people may have referred to them by this name, there is no evidence that this is common usage. It is an obviously unflattering epithet. Sondra.kinsey (talk) 22:34, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garbage Eaters
Talk:Joan Roberts

message: There are apparantly two different people named Joan Roberts who have had acting careers.  IMdB lists them separately.  We should try to make sure that we're getting it right on which one is which.  Jkelly 02:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that IMdB is also a little muddled here.  I'm not sure where we can get reliable sourcing for this.  Jkelly 02:48, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two different people 
Talk:Joe Edley

message: A lot of the article seems to come from the book Word Freak.  Should we source that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.82.44.253 (talk) 17:07, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  sourcing 

message: He has written a reasonably well selling (available in Barnes and Noble for several years, several editions) Scrabble strategy book.  Seems like deserves a mention.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.82.44.253 (talk) 17:08, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the notice, I've added a Works section with all his books I found on Google Books. -kotra (talk) 19:04, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  He has written a book
Talk:John Biguenet

message: The opening blurb is bogged down with too many details, but I don't know which ones are important enough to keep and which should be moved or removed. There's a specific comment that he was "named [the] first guest columnist by The New York Times," and I have no idea what "first guest columnist" is supposed to mean.
All in all, much of the article is taken verbatim from the sole reference item (Artists Repertory Theatre), which is the root cause of the many issues with the article as a whole. It's also worth checking whether the State Library of Louisiana is taking from this page or if page is plagiarizing them.
Just suggesting a good starting place for any future edits. PhilosophunculistsWork (talk) 01:11, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  specific problems and potential plagiarism