Talk:Prairie

message: The difference between prairie and grassland might be enlarged on. Shouldn't they be discussed at one entry, perhaps? --Wetman 08:46, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: Meaning, 2% of the total land area of the United States, or 2% of the original prairie? 71.172.238.99 (talk) 19:32, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2% left in United States? 

message: The "definition" doesn't really do a good job of explaining what a prairie is... flat? hilly? has trees? No trees? etc... It rather seems to talk to classification schemes. But no test is provided that one could apply to a stretch of land to decide if it was a prairie or not. ++Lar: t/c 11:25, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  what is a prairie? 

message: Aren't these the areas of the Dustbowl in the US?  Shouldn't this ariticle say so?  Wasn't the metal plow the start of a decade of nightmare as well as the beginning of successful farming on the prairie?
IceDragon64 (talk) 22:54, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  dustbowl? 

message: At the risk of offending it seems to me this article should be merged or renamed/rescoped in some fashion.
The article purports to be talking about a type of terrain (as opposed to a geographical area) but is really focused entirely on North America. Though there are unique aspects to the North American prairies I would argue that these are not so unique as to merit as merit an article for the sub-category of terrain in NA. If we look for example, at the French WP article this is linked to, that article is talking about a geographical area with grassland ecology but does not purport to be talking about a unique terrain type. The term "prairie" is really an Americanism invented to describe the NA grasslands.
I would suggest one of the following:
* Merge with North American Prairies Province
* Rename the article to North American Prairies (that article is currently a redirect here); if this is done there needs to be a clear distinction made between what this article covers and what North American Prairies Province covers
* Merge with Temperate grasslands, savannas, and shrublands and perhaps move some of the NA-specific content to North American Prairies Province
--Mcorazao (talk) 17:59, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Sorry, but I had to delete "turkey foot(s)" without discussion. Foots? If I am wrong, give me a reference. Anyway, turkey foot is big bluestem, so I added that, and it has a Wikipedia article. This reference  calls it "turkey feet". This one capitalizes it as "Big bluestem". This source  looks useful. But nothing seems to support "turkey foots". Taquito1 (talk) 02:55, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Turkey Foots?

message: I read the article, and it looks like it's a woodland, not a prairie.  Now I am a rather extreme inclusionist, so if anyone can come up with an even remotely plausible reason why this should be included, I'm OK with it.  Otherwise, I think it should be deleted.  Also, I noticed two places in Florida are listed---and Florida is not mentioned anywhere else in the article---but I do know that Florida has a lot of tall grass, so maybe this merits inclusion. Shanoman (talk) 03:26, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Jacobsburg Environmental Education Center, Pennsylvania 

message: This is rather doubtful.  About 95% of the corn grown in the U.S. is not destined for usage as human consumption. Ditto with soybeans. You can check references in their corresponding articles on their usage.  Corn - livestock feed and ethanol production.  Soybeans - soybean oil, livestock feed.  I perceive an amount of POV in this article. --66.41.154.0 (talk) 16:21, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I rephrased the following sentence: "Unlike corn and soybeans which are both directly and indirectly major food crops, including livestock feed, prairie grasses are not used for human consumption." Italic mine.  Maybe this will fix it... Dinkytown talk 10:11, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corn, Soybeans major food crops? 

message: This statement is dubious as well.  Prairie grasses grow and produce seed in spring and early summer. By the time July rolls around, they are done for the year and go dormant in the dry conditions. Conversely modern corn varieties are growing strong and remain green throughout the summer because of a deep root system (typically 8-10 feet). Not sure about soybeans.  --66.41.154.0 (talk) 16:33, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fertility, Deep roots 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Prairie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402140903/http://www.prairiepublic.org/television/prairie-public-on-demand/america%E2%80%99s-grasslands to http://www.prairiepublic.org/television/prairie-public-on-demand/america%E2%80%99s-grasslands
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:16, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Where is prairie Grassland located? 106.79.204.160 (talk) 12:58, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you look at the map in the article? SpinningSpark 13:31, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography 

message: I'm not familiar with how to edit pictures but could we change the lead picture to one of the really nice one's below rather than just a picture of grass. RichmanHopson (talk) 17:28, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  First picture 

message: The section labeled Physiography is incredibly long, repeats information stated elsewhere in the article, and seems to have an excessive amount of detail for an encyclopedic treatment of the subject, some of which feels tangential to the essence of "Prairie." On top of that, it cites no sources. Due to this, I've considered deleting it all, but I am reluctant to do this. However, I am stuck on how to tackle trimming it down and salvaging it, since it's a formidable text wall and I would have to track down citations for the statements given without knowing where they originally are from. PerytonMango (talk) 18:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What to do with the Physiography section?