lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bulk mail

message: Does anyone have information about how to create a national do not mail list?
Moved here from junk mail — bulk mail is a more appropriate, encyclopedic term. Wally 14:59, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We could do with finding some decent information on the laws in a selection of companies related to the sending of bulk mail.  We also ought to make a clear distinction between personally addressed junk mail and door-to-door circulars.
Here in the UK at least, personally addressed junk mail clearly stems from violations of the Data Protection Act to a fair extent.  And Mailing Preference Service is listwashing taken to the extreme. -- Smjg 12:13, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, what we would generally call junk mail here in Australia is the door-to-door type. Supermarket, hardware store and department store catalogues etc. None of it is addressed, and can be opted out by merely putting a "No Junk Mail" sign/sticker on the letterbox. --Paul 16:28, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legal issues 

message: Ok, not exactly a huge deal, but the Friends reference is wrong; Chandler gets his TV Guide with the name Ms Chnandler Bong (unless TV Guide is considered junk mail? I don't live in the US, but I'm under the impression it's not). There is that episode of Seinfeld where Kramer bricks up his mailbox so he doesn't get junk mail, though. tmimh 01:12, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misspelling Stereotype 

message: Considering that bulk mail involves 'mass produced mail, sent at a reduced cost' it seems like the word could not be used to refer to e-mail in any capacity. I remember Hotmail used to have a 'bulk mail' section. Was that a misapplication of the term? --IronMaidenRocks (talk) 20:59, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Misapplication on Internet?
Talk:European Engineer

message: Eur Ing, EUR ING, or Eur-ing. --> only EUR ING is correct and stated on the certificate  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.61.87.227 (talk) 12:02, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct capitalisation

message: Where does the Eur Ing (or should that be EUR ING?) logo used on this page come from? I have never seen it anywhere else.BealBocht (talk)
:The logo appears to be have been made by an enthusiast modifying the "Made in Europe" symbol.  It is misleading to have it here as it is not an official logo.  The fact that it is in the public domain demonstrates that it is not official. I have therefore removed it. Chemical Engineer (talk) 13:52, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo
Talk:Ross McKitrick

message: Joel B. Lewis made two edits on August 31 (here and here) removing some references to McKitrick's work. I believe that the references were appropriate and seek consensus to restore the material. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 16:32, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: McKitrick is some sort of academic or public intellectual.  Consequently he writes many things in public or semi-public fora.  For reasons of weight and significance, in order to include "McKitrick wrote X", "McKitrick said Y", etc., what should be included are secondary sources that comment on the fact that he wrote X or said Y, not the primary source in which he did the writing or saying.  Ergo I suggest you look for such secondary sources, that can then be used as references. (If none exist, that would suggest my removal was sensible.) --JBL (talk) 16:48, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Restore recently removed material?
Category talk:Middle-earth Dúnedain

message: I was wondering what category we could create in equivalency to Rulers of Numenor and Rulers of Gondor, in regards to Arnor, given how it was broken up and destroyed. "Rulers of Arnor" doesn't seem quite appropriate.
I'm not sure whether I'd prefer "Leaders of the Dúnedain of Arnor" or "Leaders of the Dúnedain of the North"? Any preferences or other suggestions? Aris Katsaris 11:23, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd prefer "of the North" — Arnor ceased to exist with Amlaith, and while Arthedain did reclaim the name of "Arnor" starting with Argeleb I, the Dúnedain of the north also included the remnant of the people of Cardolan.  11:39, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)

text: Very good point. Agreed.  16:48, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)

text: While we've got all these people actually paying attention to Middle-earth categories, I'd like to also work on the incorrectly-titled :Category:Middle-earth men. --Aranel ("Sarah") 16:46, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: And Elves, Dwarves… M-e races are Proper Nouns.  16:48, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, good. We're agreed. The next question is, how do you move a category? --Aranel ("Sarah") 18:18, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: You edit ALL articles to point to the new one… in other words you cannot :(  18:22, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey! We'll pretend it's a fun game! ;) --Aranel ("Sarah") 18:31, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)

text: Hmm, okay, nice point. Still, if we eventually decide we want a category, I think I'd now prefer the simple "Dúnedain of the North". *g* Give it a thought if you will. Aris Katsaris 19:48, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Just for the heck of it… "Heirs of Isildur"?  19:52, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)

text: I like "Dúnedain of the North".  Although it actually would include such persons as Gilraen who would not fall under "Heirs of Isildur" (which makes it different from the other two sub-catgories which specify leaders only), it avoids such questions as "can one really be called an heir if one does not inherit?" But anyway, I think "Dúnedain of the North" is more in keeping with typical LotR terminology. (However, at the moment :Category:Middle-earth places and :Category:Middle-earth are in much more desperate need of sub-dividing. I'm running out of bright ideas.) --Aranel ("Sarah") 00:05, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: "Middle-earth bodies of water" is my recommendation -- to group together the various lakes, bays and seas. Glad you like "Dúnedain of the North". Unless Anarion has significant objection, I'll probably create that one too. Aris Katsaris 00:47, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No objection whatsoever.  07:55, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposing Category

message: I suppose it is needless having the Stewards mentioned in two categories, M-e Dúnedain and Rulers of Gondor? The latter is clearly a subcategory of the former, as all of them were Dúnedain of high descent. If no objections, I'll possibly remove M-e Dúnedain cat from articles on Stewards. Súrendil 09:35, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate categorizing
Talk:Classifying space

message: Definition by homotopy groups: well, I don't think that's in good taste, and I see User:Waltpohl thinks it's suspect. So perhaps we should look to have the weak equivalence page written, which would allow one to explain why (and to what extent) anyone might come up with such a definition. Also someone to write the Eilenberg-Mac Lane space page, so we can start untangling this, without junking the intuitions right now.
Charles Matthews 11:48, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition

message: I'm lost at the beginning: "It has the property that any G principal bundle over a paracompact manifold is isomorphic to a pullback of the principal bundle." A pull back induced by what map? The only map even hinted at is the quotient map, but it is not obvious how this map is related to the arbitrary paracompact manifold.
Dewa (talk) 02:45, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lost

message: I think we want Z^2n for the Torus of genus 'n'. - D.S.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhs601 (talk • contribs) 19:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: When people say the "n-Torus", the n refers to the dimension of the manifold, not the genus. The article as written is correct in this usage.67.198.37.16 (talk) 15:41, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Torus

message: There is quite some material on this page, it would be nice if we could cite some references. Alvisetrevi (talk) 12:36, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Sculptor Group

message: From Wikipedia:Categorisation#When_to_use_categories:
:“An article should not be in both a category and its subcategory, e.g. Microsoft Office is in :Category:Microsoft software, so should not also be in :Category:Software. An exception would be an article that defines a category, and so is itself a parent article of subtopics as well as one in a series of like topics - for instance, placing Ohio in both :Category:Political divisions of the United States and :Category:Ohio.”
So this article should be in both :Category:Sculptor Group and :Category:Galaxy clusters. —Rory ☺ 11:58, Sep 6, 2004 (UTC)
:Although none of the other Galaxy clusters are formed that way, they only appear in the subcategory, not in the Galaxy clusters category. Should the exception be used, as it is not used for any others now.132.205.15.4 20:33, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories
Talk:Oriel College, Oxford

message: Some indication of some pronunciation would help.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.79.29.112 (talk) 15:15, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  IPA 

message: I'm the comms officer at Oriel College (and therefore won't edit directly) but I wanted to request that somebody please update the page to reflect our recent change in Provost. Moira Wallace came to the end of her term on 31st August 2018, and Neil Mendoza (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Mendoza) took up the post of Provost on 1st September 2018. His profile page on the College website is here in case you need to link to it: https://www.oriel.ox.ac.uk/people/mr-neil-mendoza. Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katie Brown (talk • contribs) 08:20, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page update needed - new Provost 

message: This is a 2007 Featured article that has not been maintained to WP:WIAFA standards.  There is considerable uncited text, overquoting, short choppy sections, and citation formatting needs cleanup.  Unless someone is able to restore this article to FA standards, it should be submitted to Featured article review.  SandyGeorgia (Talk)  22:12, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured article review needed 

message: thanks for making a start on this. Most of the information on the chapel glass seems to be available at https://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/oxon/vol3/pp119-131 (Presentation) and https://www.british-history.ac.uk/rchme/oxon/pp91-95 (St Margaret). Are you familiar with the notation for references used in 2007? TSventon (talk) 01:13, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating the article
Talk:Australasian gannet

message: Query "The Australian Gannet (Morus serrator or Sula bassana)..."
Sula bassana is the Northern Gannet. Should this be Sula serrator, or is it a view that this is a subspecies of Northern? jimfbleak 12:53, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Sula bassana

message: (seems to be) Move Duja 11:14, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: BTW, one of the major reason I don't like using Google is because it tends to have a pro-US and pro-Western bias even cf the number of English speakers. This probably doesn't really apply to this case Nil Einne 07:58, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving to Australasian Gannet 

message: Does anyone know what the Maori word's etymology is? Richard001 (talk) 05:51, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See https://pollex.shh.mpg.de/entry/takupu/, which is now cited in the article. Nurg (talk) 09:39, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Takapu 

message: I'll get some soon. Richard001 (talk) 02:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Got both (though there are some more pictures and another video to come). Richard001 (talk) 07:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audio/video 

message: : 
Can a single egg be a clutch? I thought clutch meant multiple eggs. (Erroneously asked this in archive, so moving to here}.Moriori (talk) 21:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: looking at google, it suggests 'yes'  Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:21, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm. Wikipedia is not so sure. Clutch (eggs) says '"A clutch of eggs is the group of eggs produced by birds, amphibians, or reptiles...". Moriori (talk) 00:24, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Clutch in the context of a metric would include clutches of one though, and is commonly used in that context in avian biology. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 03:39, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question re clutch
Talk:Kenya Air Force

message: Welcome to Wikipedia, unknown user from Kenya. Hope you stick around for longer. And maybe, you want to create your own account. See also Wikipedia:Welcome.
Hope you didn't mind me formatting your article a bit. Gtx from Innsbruck, Austria. Simon A. 13:39, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: This sentence seemed a little odd in the lead paragraph:
Due to lack of combat it largely provides relief services.
- it sounds a bit like a judgement, not a strictly factual statement about the KAF. It may, of course, be true, but it doesn't in its present form read like a verifiable encylopaedic fact and for now I have removed it. Might it now be possible to find a citeable source which says something about its role as defined by government, or something a bit more official-sounding? Thanks and best wishes, DBaK (talk) 08:12, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of combat? 

message: Refer to jane's for MD530 and airliners photo for Z-9, it seems MD530 and Z-9 belong to Kenya Army's 50th Air Cavalry Battalion and should not be included in air force inventory. Ckfasdf (talk) 09:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  air force copters?
Talk:Graphology

message: I noticed Max Pulver was removed on the grounds of _undue coverage_.  His research is the framework for Holistic Graphology. If you want to understand the why of the Wittlich Character Diagram, The Psychograph, The Muller-Enskat Protokol, The Personal Worth Chart, Sisteme de Xandro, The Psychograph, or other holistic approaches, you need to understand Pulver.
Pulver, like Szondi, Moretti, Xandro. Wittlich, and Ploog were not discussed by the original contributors, and thus a US-centric pov dominated/still dominates the article. --  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:100F:B07D:949B:E939:BD79:1C4:3BFB (talk) 20:05, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Max Pulver
Category talk:Star Wars characters

message: Since there's something like 99% overlap between noteworthy Rebel Alliance and noteworthy New Republic characters, does anyone object to me combining these categories to "Rebel Alliance and New Republic characters"? Also posted this question to the subcategs as well. --Aris Katsaris 13:50, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: A good idea. --Maru (talk) 23:16, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combining subcats
Talk:Computer-aided design

message: * What I think should be changed: Hi, I am new here, so would like to ask a question: is it possible to add PARTsolutions by CADENAS also on this list or to write a short article and then add it to the list? This 3D modeling software exist since 90's, so that fact speaks for itself. It is a commercial 3D software used by some of world-wide known companies. Thank you in advance! https://partsolutions.com/partsolutions/     https://www.solidworks.com/partner-product/partsolutions 
* Why it should be changed: 
* References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button): 
Dape13 (talk) 09:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done. This is supposed to be an encyclopedia article, not a list of every possible software package. --Wtshymanski (talk) 03:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request edit on 30 November 2021 

message: I noticed that CADSTAR is missing from the list of CAD software, which is one of the oldest CAD software dating back to the 1980's I wish to add this piece of CAD history. Beentothecrunch (talk) 09:00, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now:  Which list do you want to add CADSTAR to, please state clearly. Lightoil (talk) 12:34, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 July 2023 

message: Add Cadmatic to the list of CAD software tools. We are very big in the Marine and Plant industries for 3D engineering CAD and P&ID as well as 2D and 3D electrical design. www.cadmatic.com Toni Renberg (talk) 10:38, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: No evidence of notability through coverage in independent, reliable sources, would recommend writing the article first. Also note that you would need to declare a conflict of interest. Liu1126 (talk) 10:56, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 November 2023 

message: The Wikipedia article on parametric equations has some good information on CAD, but finding that again, if you don't remember where you saw it, is impossible. So, a reference to it should be made here in this article. Kontribuanto (talk) 22:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  lost CAD reference
Talk:Taj Mahal

message: It states in the first paragraph that the Taj Mahal was commissioned in 1632, then in the first paragraph of "Inspiration," it says it was 1631. Which is it? Also, there is an error in the last paragraph where it says, "These idea." One is singular, the other plural. Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyrtneg (talk • contribs) 19:45, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks for telling us! 69.94.41.155 (talk) 05:34, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistakes 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ugee123 (talk) 14:47, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It was good talking to you@Ugee123 204.111.163.60 (talk) 08:09, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki Education assignment: Research, Writing, and the Production of Knowledge 

message: There is a huge autopromo message from a banned user, we could get rid off. Обмен (talk) 15:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to be template vandalism, so I've removed the  IPAc-en template temporarily. This is unlikely to be an issue with just this article, so I'll look into it. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove the big autopromo
Talk:Equivalent potential temperature

message: Clear as mud:) Lifted adiabatically? to dew point - then squeeze all the water vapor out (how??). Then drop it back down. Does the latent heat of evap stay with it? What is the point of this bit of jargon? Would help to know the use. --Vsmith 15:03, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mud 

message: "Some of the internal energy of the parcel is used up in doing the work required to expand against the atmospheric pressure, so the temperature of the parcel drops, even though it has not lost any heat. Conversely, a sinking parcel is compressed and becomes warmer even though no heat is added."
I'm 95% sure this is wrong...  the energy isn't used up causing it to drop in temperature. It's an adiabatic change in temperature, the temperature change is because of the difference in pressure caused by rising. Less pressure, lower temperature. I think it may just be badly worded though.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.221.226.37 (talk) 21:07, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation for adiabatic temperature change
Talk:Intersection cohomology

message: I think intersection homology would be a more standard page title here. 
Charles Matthews 15:34, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: Somebody should write about the history of IC.  References?  Mhym 20:08, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: The statement that IC_X \otimes IC_X is the Verdier dualizing object D_X is false; there is a
canonical map IC_X \otimes IC_X --> D_X which induces a dual pairing, but it is almost never an 
isomorphism.  It's not immediately clear how to fix the original author's intended development 
without a major rewrite. TCBraden 18:46, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed
Talk:Thousand-year egg

message: The paragraph on how they are made was copied from Fermented egg, which originally consisted wholly of a verbatim copy from another source, possibly the 1881 Household Cyclopedia. If someone could rewrite the entire paragraph (and verify that the described process is accurate) please do so. -- Paul Richter 15:34, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied text
Talk:Memory allocation

message: This page probably needs to be merged with dynamic memory allocation. The buddy algorithm discussed herein already has its own article. First-fit, best-fit, and worst-fit probably should be discussed here. Will do this if no one else gets to it first. Derrick Coetzee 17:34, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge is done. Seems I forgot all about this, oops. Deco 05:53, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: agree that this should be merged Mrmcgibby 21:40, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agreed 

message: IMO, memory allocation should not point to Dynamic Memory Allocation, as there are at least two other types of Memory Allocation (notably, Static and Automatic).
This page should be an access point to those 3 kinds of Memory Allocation.--Asymmetric (talk) 18:07, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unmerge
Talk:Juliett-class submarine

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 16:22, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: In German Wikipedia the article  describes sovjet sub U-461 aka. K-24, which is used as museum ship in Peenemünde. This sub has no article in English Wikipedia. Another sub with number U-461 is German_submarine_U-461, but now has no article in German Wikipedia... Maybe someone wants to add an article. --83.221.254.48 (talk) 16:10, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  last existing sub of this class is without article