Talk:History of the Philippines (1946–1965)

message: I propose that Philippine independence be merged into this article. Unless there is opposition, I plan to do this merge within the next few days. -- Boracay Bill (talk) 01:38, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed mergefrom Philippine independence 

message: WP:V says: "All quotations [...] should be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation."  Since none of the quotations in the Quotes subsection of the American recognition of independence (1946) subsection meet this requirement, I have supplied supporting sources for two of the three quotes, but I could not find supporting sources for the third quote. I've moved that third quote here.
I did find some similar source-supported Beveridge quotations:
*"..., the Philippines are ours forever, and Cuba ought to have been ours, ..."  (second half of seventh paragraph). 
*"Mr. President, the times call for candor. The Philippines are ours forever, "territory belonging to the United States," as the Constitrltion calls them. And just beyond the Philippines are China's illimitable markets. We will not retreat from either. We will not repudiate our duty in the archipelago. We will not abandon our opportunity in the Orient. We will not renounce our part in the mission of our race, trustee, under God, of the civilization of the world. And we will move forward to our work, not howling out regrets like slaves whipped to their burdens, but with gratitude for a task worthy of our strength, and thanksgiving to Almighty God that He has marked us as His chosen people, henceforth to lead in the regeneration of the world."  (From Congressional Record(56th Cong., 1st Session) Vol XXXIII, pp.705, 711) (archived from the original on 2004-12-24).
-- Boracay Bill (talk) 06:03, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotes 

message: Are the quotes (from the early 1900s) relevant to this page (titled History of the Philippines (1946–1965))? -- Boracay Bill (talk) 06:13, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relvance of quotes questioned 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on History of the Philippines (1946–65). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://untreaty.un.org/unts/1_60000/1/6/00000254.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090512212522/http://www.bibingka.com/phg/documents/jun12.htm to http://www.bibingka.com/phg/documents/jun12.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.op.gov.ph/museum/pres_roxas.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:13, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article only covers the history since 1946, when American troops left and the country became independent. However it would be useful to have links to articles about the colonial and precolonial history of the islands, as well as the master article, History_of_the_Philippines.
Flameoguy (talk) 20:02, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: There are links in the navigation template at the bottom of the article, and currently also in a sidebar template. Where were you looking for the links? Would a See also section serve? CMD (talk) 02:59, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to other eras of Philippine history 

message: In 1953, in his second term, the Korean War began at The Quirino Administration (1948–1953) is strange because it began in 25th June 1950 and ended in 27th July 1953.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bletilla (talk • contribs) 07:32, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: When the Korean war began

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: To be consistent with the contents of Philippine Republic, this article should be renamed into History of the Philippines (1946–1972) and include the first and second terms of Ferdinand Marcos as these are still part of the Third Republic. History of the Philippines (1965–1986) is too broad and portions of it should be divided/merged into:
* History of the Philippines (1946–1972) or Third Philippine Republic
* History of the Philippines (1972–1981) or Martial law under Ferdinand Marcos
* History of the Philippines (1981-1986) or Fourth Philippine Republic
—Sanglahi86 (talk) 13:45, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Reorganizing to bring the Third Republic history together has been proposed before, and has merit. I wouldn't split up martial law and Fourth Republic though, as that makes the various timeframes in the series even more lopsided (not to mention how short this article is currently). CMD (talk) 14:54, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree with CMD that the Martial Law and Fourth Philippine Republic eras cannot be separated. Not just because of scale issues but because the declaration of the 4th Republic is acknowledged by many mainstream historians as just a means for the perpetuation of Marcos'grip on power. I do think there's a strong argument for subsuming 1946 to 1972 under Third Philippine Republic, and then having 1972-1986 under an umbrella term like The Marcos dictatorship (a widely used periodization), although common practice is still to date that term all the way to '65.  For the moment, I'm fine with either of those, but not with elevating 1981-1986's status as a separate "Fourth Philippine Republic" period, even if it used that name on paper. - Batongmalake (talk) 03:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed renaming and merging of contents