lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Victor Cavendish-Bentinck, 9th Duke of Portland

message: Cavendish-Bentinck is referred to throughout this article as "the duke".  However, he didn't inherit the dukedom until he was 83, long after most of the events in his life being described, and as an heir presumptive, he presumably wasn't even entitled to a courtesy title during this period.  Is it proper to call him "the duke" retroactively" like this?  I'm totally ignorant of UK peerage protocol, so I'm curious, but it does strike me as odd. --Jfruh (talk) 15:15, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He WAS specifically granted the style,rank,and precedence of the younger son of a duke in 1977,early in his time as heir presumptive to his brother...this was mentioned in Who's Who (1981 edition page 447,for example).But until their cousin died in 1977 he and his brother were known by their knighthoods.12.144.5.2 (talk) 02:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Calling him "the duke" before he inherits?
Talk:Le Corsaire

message: Just a note to say that I have removed some images from the page beacuse they were speediable under either:
:Category:Images with no fair use rationale
:Category:Images with no copyright tag
:Category:Images with no source
Or similar category. Kilo-Lima|(talk) 15:24, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed deleted images

message: I have seen the Rome Ballet's production and post-2002 performances of ABT's "Le Corsaire".
I have a recording of the score used for Grigorovich's 1994 production of "Le Corsaire".
There is no way that Kevin Galie's orchestration for both ABT and the Rome Ballet's "Le Corsaire" could be 100% his own work. Even though Grigorovich's 1994 production offered some numbers that ABT's production and the Rome production doesnt (and, at times, the Rome and ABT versions offer music that the Grigorovich version didnt), the music is EXACTLY the same with regard to the orchestration of the numbers that all three productions use.
I have removed the passage that goes into detail regarding Galie's work on the score.
--Mrlopez2681 (talk) 03:31, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Galie's work 

message: Call me a boring traditionalist but shouldn't this article include a section which tells the story? Currently Ithe reader will have no idea. Or does this not matter ("it's only a ballet") or are there too many alternate versions?
A short synopsis can be found e.g. here. 
Testbed (talk) 06:02, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Synopsis added.  Every-leaf-that-trembles (talk) 03:09, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot?!
Talk:Tennessee Smokies

message: * Agree: The team moved, it is the same franchise CJC47 15:26, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Team logo posted here is incorrect, refer to their official webpage to see the correct logo.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.2.247.32 (talk) 12:37, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team Logo 

message: Need to add Mickey Lolich to the notable alumni. 76.129.167.236 (talk) 22:52, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to add Mickey Lolich to the notable alumni
Talk:Arkadiusz Radomski

message: Just a note to say that I have removed some images from the page beacuse they were speediable under either:
:Category:Images with no fair use rationale
:Category:Images with no copyright tag
:Category:Images with no source
Or similar category. Kilo-Lima|(talk) 15:26, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed deleted images
Talk:Bartosz Bosacki

message: Just a note to say that I have removed some images from the page beacuse they were speediable under either:
:Category:Images with no fair use rationale
:Category:Images with no copyright tag
:Category:Images with no source
Or similar category. Kilo-Lima|(talk) 15:26, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed deleted images
Talk:Aberdeen, Kamloops

message: This is rare - a small-BC-city neighbourhood stub; either this one gets zapped, or other Kamloops neighbourhoods also get enumerated; without the stuff about what a great place for kids which sounds so much like a pitch as opposed to a report.Skookum1 15:32, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sounds like real estate brochure bumpf

message: It has been proposed to move Aberdeen to Aberdeen, Scotland or Aberdeen city, and to move Aberdeen (disambiguation) to Aberdeen.  The discussion about this is here.  --Una Smith (talk) 16:30, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice of requested move
Talk:Infrastructure in London

message: Transport is often counted under infrastructure. So wouldn't it make sense to put it under here? Or at least make some reference to it? Simply south 15:32, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We just split Transport and infrastructure in London into two articles, this one and Transport in London. However, although I put a link from the transport one to here, I forgot to do the reverse - now done! --Dave A 16:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Ireneusz Jeleń

message: Just a note to say that I have removed some images from the page beacuse they were speediable under either:
:Category:Images with no fair use rationale
:Category:Images with no copyright tag
:Category:Images with no source
Or similar category. Kilo-Lima|(talk) 15:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed deleted images
Talk:List of characters from Mr. Show

message: First it's said that Kedzie Matthews is a veiled parody of Robin Williams, then this is replaced to see he's a veiled parody of Dane Cook? Until I see some evidence (a cite of commentary from Bob or David, for example), I'm going to keep assuming the most natural thing: Kedzie Matthews is an entirely unveiled parody of mediocre stand-up comedians in general. -Chinju 15:37, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kedzie Matthews

message: How many single-appearance characters should be listed, and what have been the criteria for including them up until now?  The list seems to be a hodge-podge of scattered memories of parts of the show.  How are we defining who gets onto the list, beacuse there are many more characters (played by both main and featured cast) that are given a name in the show, and appear only once.  Who's interesting, and who isn't? Eganio 04:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single-appearance characters
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains/Recent changes

message: This page is very useful - great job Slambo in assembling it. I wonder if it should be called something else - it has more uses than just for finding Recent Changes. This is becoming the comprehensive list of train-related Wikipedia articles. Should we call it something like WikiProjectTrains/Train-related articles instead? Gwernol 15:39, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Derived set (mathematics)

message: A perfect set is not a synonym for a derived set, nor is perfect set closely tied to the terminology derived set.  A perfect set is a closed  set with no isolated points.  The fact that you can express this in terms of derived sets is irrelevant.  
Google "perfect set" you get the definition for derived set because of this idiotic redirect.  Whoever is doing such things, please stop making Wikipedia unusable by deleting useful pages.  I'm recreating the perfect set page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.21.160.133 (talk) 18:00, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does perfect set redirect here? 

message: This is not a property of the derived set operation: Consider the set {x,y} with the topology where only the whole set and the empty set are open. Take S={x}. Then S'={y} and (S')'={x}
I don't know how old this unsigned remark is, but: If S={x}, then S*={x,y} and not only {y}. ! Therefore we have that S** is a subset of S*, since S** and S* are actually equal (in this example). --131.234.106.197 (talk) 15:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  S** subset S* 

message: What's the relation between the derived set of a set, and the closure of that set?  It would seem that in metric spaces the concepts coincide, no? -GTBacchus(talk) 07:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A derived set might not contain some of the points of the original set, eg. isolated points. But the closure of a set is the union of the set with its derived set. 192.75.48.150 17:41, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to closure 

message: :Bendixson proved that every uncountable closed set can be partitioned into a perfect set, called the Bendixson derivative of the original set and a countable set.
The name "Cantor-Bendixson theorem" rings a bell, and I think it was something like this, but this isn't quite right is it? Take an uncountable set which is totally discrete. It is an uncountable closed set, as required. But the only perfect set is empty, and the remainder is uncountable. Maybe there's some condition missing here. Google doesn't help and I don't have access to my dead trees at the moment. 192.75.48.150 17:32, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing that out.  I fixed the statement to make it correct.  I don't know if it really belongs here, however. CMummert 17:43, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bendixson
Talk:Dariusz Dudka

message: Just a note to say that I have removed some [or an] image[s] from the page beacuse they were speediable under either:
:Category:Images with no fair use rationale
:Category:Images with no copyright tag
:Category:Images with no source
Or similar category. Kilo-Lima|(talk) 15:47, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed deleted image(s)
Talk:Mariusz Lewandowski

message: Just a note to say that I have removed some [or an] image[s] from the page beacuse they were speediable under either:
:Category:Images with no fair use rationale
:Category:Images with no copyright tag
:Category:Images with no source
Or similar category. Kilo-Lima|(talk) 15:47, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed deleted image(s)
Talk:R and W Hawthorn

message: The company stil seem to exist. See this advertisement. What is the story?Smiley.toerist (talk) 23:12, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: As the article states, it became Hawthorn Leslie and Company, and this one is the company in the advertisement.--Pere prlpz (talk) 00:54, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Live after 1880 

message: The article states that the Modling for Vienna in 1831 was the first locomotive product. No citation is provided for this. I am working in the North of England Institute of Mining and Mechanical Engineers, yards from the factory site and in part paid for by Robert Stephenson with whom Hawthorns later amalgamated. They were neighbours. In the library collection item 929.2 RSH is a generous catalogue from the combined company issued c1952/53.  In the section headed "A Brief History of the Company" it states "The brothers Hawthorn entered the locomotive business in 1831, when they delivered their first engine "The Coronation" to the Stockton & Darlington Railway". How should this be resolved?  Robertforsythe (talk) 12:03, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  The source for the Modling claim would appear to be Graces Guide. Behind it, is I think British Steam Locomotive Builders by Lowe, Goose & Son, 1975 (which I have), page 313 is the source of the Modling claim. But try as I might looking for early Austrian locomotives away from this source and I do not get this engine. Robertforsythe (talk) 20:37, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  This source would suggest a typo has taken place in sources and that the Modling is 1841. This would make much better sense.  Locomotive list in German. Robertforsythe (talk) 14:36, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Locomotive Made
Talk:Monkeewrench

message: How do you make a picture smaller? Xidon 15:49, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Considering the book was released in america, under the name Monkeewrench, before it was released in the UK as Want to Play, shouldn't the article be titled Monkeewrench? Or at least have searches for Monkeewrench redirect here...?  i dont know how to do that...
:Done, all we need now is some more article content, particularly more critical comment, reviews and reaction. Also a 1st ed cover would be good. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 09:31, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Monkeewrench
Talk:Chern–Weil homomorphism

message: I can't seem to locate a good reference for this theorem.  The Narasimhan and Ramanan paper cites some lecture notes by Chern, but these notes are unavailable to me.  I have an unsettling feeling that there may be no definitive reference, but that it is one of those theorems of mathematical folklore -- passed from teacher to student by word of mouth. Silly rabbit 16:00, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References?

message: *Support. The stub would benefit from a merger with this article.Brirush (talk) 20:49, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed meger
Talk:Rafael Marín

message: Is this the same Rafael Marín who translated Richard Garfinkle's science-fiction novel in 2003?  I added it to the list in October of 2007, but 84.122.18.32 removed it in May 2008, without comment.  Can anyone verify?
Artemis-Arethusa (talk) 18:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Translator of "[[Celestial Matters]]"?
Talk:Aladdin (1992 Golden Films film)

message: What sort of verification or source is needed for this article?  It doesn't really have much trivial stuff in need of being verified. T.W. (talk) 23:27, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification 
Talk:Sinbad (1992 film)

message: :Sinbad (1993 film) →  – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. ScratchMarshall (talk) 07:08, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved. No such user (talk) 10:50, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 June 2017 

message: If the article cannot be expanded, I'd suggest to redirect to GoodTimes Entertainment. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 05:43, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Persecution of Atheists

message: May be this article isn't NPOV, but as it is written it certainly seems that way. Perhaps it is only in need of a cleanup. A Cleanup which I cannnot provide. This Article reads less like an encyclopedic entry on Persecution of a group, and more like a strange tirade against the U.S. and the Supreme Court. Just my 2 cents... anyone else have an opinion?
:I think it reads fine, and I think the cases mentioned are very interesting, and I often wonder why my country (not american) didn't go through equivalent processes yet. Also, it might look like a tirade against them, but to me it looks like they have a tirade against atheists, so I guess it evens out. PHF 04:47, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: Though all the information in this article seems good, I think it needs more information. A lot of
what the previous writer said is correct: because it lacks information, it does seem like a tirade 
against U.S. policies and not NPOV. The simple way to fix this is talk more widely about current world
views on atheism, and to include more opinions of those who disagree with it. I don't have much 
information myself, and request that people add to this article.
:Well, I could suggest something to be added, I would like to see a mention on Nazi Germany persecution of atheists. PHF 04:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could be expanded 
Talk:Agustín Delgado

message: Comment: Needs sources.
Parts of this need rewriting, a lot of sentences are confusingly phrased and some info is duplicated. --MartinUK 16:17, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Biography rating completed 
Talk:Sebastian Mila

message: Just a note to say that I have removed some [or an] image[s] from the page beacuse they were speediable under either:
:Category:Images with no fair use rationale
:Category:Images with no copyright tag
:Category:Images with no source
Or similar category. Kilo-Lima|(talk) 16:19, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed deleted image(s)
Talk:Piotr Giza

message: Just a note to say that I have removed some [or an] image[s] from the page beacuse they were speediable under either:
:Category:Images with no fair use rationale
:Category:Images with no copyright tag
:Category:Images with no source
Or similar category. Kilo-Lima|(talk) 16:19, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed deleted image(s)
Talk:Umbro Cup

message: OK, but... who won? --Abu Badali 16:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

message: 'During the course of the competition, England played their first home game away from Wembley.' This seems unlikely to be true as there was an England international team long before Wembley was built in the 1920s and some England internationals took place at Villa Park in the 1940s and 1950s (See for example 1958–59 British Home Championship). Dunarc (talk) 22:36, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query re statement
Talk:Gotee Records

message: I didn't hear that they were signed to Gotee?
Are they really signed to Gotee? if so, please note a reference.Ein 22:12, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eleventyseven 

message: I was looking on the RIAA database at Gotee Records and there are four singles that have gone Gold that I thought should be listed on this Wikipedia page for the record label. 
- Relient K - Be My Escape (Gold on October 4th, 2005)
- Relient K - Who I Am Hates Who I've Been (Gold on February 15th, 2006)
- Jamie Grace - Hold Me (Feat. TobyMac) (Gold on May 12th, 2014)
- Grits - Ooh Ahh Feat. TobyMac (Gold on May 29th, 2014) 
I think that those are considerable milestones for the label and that they should be listed on the page, but I wasn't sure and that's why I wanted to put it here first and talk about it. You can find this information above by going to the following link and searching for the artists :http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?content_selector=gold-platinum-searchable-database
50.182.139.42 (talk) 18:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating Gotee Records RIAA Certifications
Talk:Air (video game)/Archive 1

message: What is an "insertion song"? Is that some sort of creepy jargon for something you hear in an H-scene? LogicalDash
:In anime terms, an "Insert Song" is a piece of vocal background music that is played during the show Shiroi Hane 01:43, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Insert song?

message: If the conflict has been resolved by having all albums recalled, is the controversy still "current"?
:The investigation is still ongoing, so that is current.  Likewise, there are reports that some copies of the album are still on store shelves, which makes it current and very controversial (as it means that SonyBMG or store owners may have defied the recall).  Am attempting to verify this before I add more info.--Mitsukai 18:13, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: Considering there isn't a separate article for the anime, I put the WikiProject:Anime and manga template up top. --Geopgeop 09:25, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It should remain as AIR (game), because that's the primary form it came in, even though it's known more for the anime.  The WP:MOS does not allow for slash breakdowns as you have it in the title, unless it is specifically a part of the title (like Fate/stay night.--み使い Mitsukai 03:35, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Anime

message: Misuzu's aunt/mother wasn't an alcoholic, she simply enjoyd a drink after work and I have edited the page accordingly Wartime1 01:23, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haruko Kamio
Talk:Taiyi Shengshui

message: Hello,
This article needs alot of work. I cannot write the article myself at this time, so here I shall put some things.
The correct Chinese text for the beginning is:
太一生水，水反輔太一，是以成天。天反輔太一，是以成地。天地复相輔也，是以成神明。神明复相輔也，是以成陰陽。陰陽复相輔也，是以成四時。四時复相輔也，是以成滄熱。滄熱复相輔也，是以成濕燥。濕燥复相輔也，成歲而止。
I believe Shui 水 should be read as Liu 流 – Flow(ing), as in the modern Shuiliu 水流 – "flowing, current."
It is likely this understanding of Daoism that prompted Alan Watts to entitle his book on Daoism “Tao: The Watercourse Way.” However, you want to translate Shui as Water, that's okay.
In the 33rd chapter of the Zhuangzi, we are told that Lao Dan regarded this same “Great One (Tai Yi 太一)” as supreme.
Reference to Taiyi in the Han text Huainanzi ch. 14: 洞同天地，渾沌為樸，未造而成物，謂之太一。
"When the Heavens and the Earth were undifferentiated, all was chaotic (Hundun) and simple, nothing had been made and yet it was complete in itself, this we call the Great One (Tai Yi)."
“Tai Yi” can be understood as one synonym of Dao. In the Lüshi Chunqiu, 5.2 – “The Dao is the supreme instance of the seminal essence, for it cannot be given shape or name. ‘Forced to give it a name, I would call it the Grand One’” (Knoblock & Riegel p. 138). According to Li Ling, who has written extensively on the “cult of Tai Yi” in the ancient state of Chu, Tai Yi “referred to a linked set of concepts: an ultimate, a supreme spirit, an astral body, and the Dao.” (p. 163 The Guodian Laozi: Proceedings of the International Conference, 1998.)
Bao Pu 17:07, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Taiyi Shengshui
Talk:Robert Stephenson and Company

message: The first locomotive built by Robert Stephenson and Company, as opposed to Robert Stephenson himself was the Lancashire Witch. The article needs sorting out to get this locomotive in at the correct place (before or after Experiment?). Mjroots (talk) 13:46, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: First locomotive?

message: I've added the category Millwrights based on Stepensons own business card. Mjroots (talk) 14:16, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Millwrights
Talk:Brachycera

message: The encyclopedia should link the world to the language. Thus: is this a fly, or is it not? Trondtr (talk) 17:54, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this actually a fly? 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Fly June 2009-1.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on December 3, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-12-03. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:53, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Fly June 2009-1.jpg]] to appear as POTD
Talk:Bartlett High School (Tennessee)

message: The mascot is listed as Panther, which points to a disambiguation page.  Is this a solid cat, or does it have spots?  Is it solid black? - Slow Graffiti 16:36, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The mascot is a solid black cat SkaTroma 08:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mascot 
Talk:Brutus (Cicero)

message: A recent reversion has got rid of a detailed summary of the Brutus by Cicero1989 on the grounds that it is "unsourced, too detailed, and non-encyclopedic". Well, it is too detailed for an encyclopedia, and it uses the primary source rather than secondary ones. I don't plan to reinstate it en bloc. But I enjoyed reading it - thanks Cicero1989 - and I suggest that it could usefully be cut down and might then represent a great improvement to the article. For a start, perhaps it should name only those orators who are notable enough to have Wikipedia pages of their own, and use the standard spelling of Tully's name. What do others think? Richard Keatinge (talk) 16:46, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent expansion by [[User:Cicero1989|Cicero1989]]
Talk:List of United States representatives from South Carolina

message: South Carolina has no 7th district. Blackburn is from Tennessee. Keelay 16:40, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Twist (song)

message: Since the article about the dance has been moved to twist, I think this page could be moved to The Twist. // Habj 16:40, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 

message: Neither of the footnotes are working properly. #1 results in a 404 error, and #2 links to an irrelevant page JH443 (talk) 12:05, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 