Talk:Kunduz Province

message: This is an interesting article. We should have more of this type of articles. Mkland (talk) 08:18, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reverted edits by an anon IP, most likely that of a banned user, and restored the previous sourced information. Tajik (talk) 22:29, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Aliabad has a Pashtun-Uzbek population. The district is dominated by Uzbeks but Pashtuns represent the governeur. The number of Tajiks is there nearly zero. --188.107.4.206 (talk) 15:04, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aliabad 

message: All sources agree that there is a Pashtun majority in Kunduz Province. Here is one credible source. More sources can be added if needed.
* Constraints to Growth in Northeastern Afghanistan - Harvard - "It is the only province in the Northeast with a Pashtun majority ..."
(Ketabtoon (talk) 04:23, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kunduz Province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121002214003/http://www.nps.edu/programs/ccs/Kunduz/Kunduz_Executive_2009.pdf to http://www.nps.edu/Programs/CCS/Kunduz/Kunduz_Executive_2009.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150628124105/http://www.nps.edu/Programs/CCS/Kunduz/Kunduz.html to http://www.nps.edu/Programs/CCS/Kunduz/Kunduz.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:28, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Took a look over the 'demographics' column in the Districts section. Only one district has a source listed that worked (Ali Abad) and it was completely wrong. Originally the wiki page showed 73% Tajik, 11% Pashtuns,  8% Hazara, 8% Uzbek while the source it referenced showed something completely different (47% Pashtuns, 33% Tajik, 12% Hazara, 8% Uzbek).... So I went ahead and fixed that. The rest of the column is unsourced and very likely incorrect.
Look at a previously listed source (Naval Postgraduate school). It lists the ethnic groups as follows:
https://web.archive.org/web/20121002214003/http://www.nps.edu/programs/ccs/Kunduz/Kunduz_Executive_2009.pdf
Pashtun: 33%
Uzbek: 27%
Tajik: 22%
Turkmen: 11%
Hazara: 6%
Pashai: 1%
It goes on to say:
"Gilzhai Pashtuns comprise 33% of the population of Kunduz and are the majority ethnic group in the province. They are primarily found in Imam Sahib District."
The numbers from the Imam Sahib district in the table read as: 35% Turkmens 30% Uzbeks, 20% Tajiks, 15% Pashtuns
So per the source (Naval Postgraduate School): the major ethnic group of the province who are primarily found in the Imam Sahib district comprise only 15% of Imam Sahib district. Clearly this is incorrect.
Removing all data in the 'Demographics' column that is unsourced. WikiEditUsername7 (talk) 16:07, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of 'Demographics' column in Districts section 

message: Please lock this page the some users want minimize Tajik population. Hisksjueeu (talk) 11:22, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @Hisksjueeu: If you want to request page protection, you may do so at WP:RfPP. —Danre98(talk^contribs) 14:17, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:23, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:53, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion