lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:USS Mississippi (BB-41)

message: The Winona Times reference is not available now on the Web. Bruin2 (talk) 15:15, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Winona Times'' link

message: It seems unlikely that the full load displacement is only 1000 tons more than normal displacement. Also date (1919-2012) is obviously wrong.Pennsy22 (talk) 06:09, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: After checking Janes and Friedman, the displacement appears to be correct. Parsecboy appears to have corrected to date problem.Pennsy22 (talk) 13:47, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed - if you had bothered to check the source first, we could have avoided that. Parsecboy (talk) 13:53, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of us don't carry all of our reference books with us all the time, I was pointing out things that looked wrong so they could be looked at, a simple acknowledgement here would have cleared them up.Pennsy22 (talk) 14:06, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd have thought reverting the first tag and fixing the second would have done as much. Parsecboy (talk) 14:29, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification needed 

message: I'm planning to add info from Friedman's battleship book, pp. 402-403, about Mississippis armament as AG-128 to the "Postwar service" subsection. I also plan to mention there that in some references she has the hull classification symbol "EAG-128". I do not plan any changes to the infobox. Just a heads-up in case there is some reason this info isn't already there. RobDuch (talk) 04:54, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Go right ahead - I probably just forgot to look there. Parsecboy (talk) 14:43, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armament as AA/missile test ship
Talk:The Mike O'Malley Show

message: This stub, as it stands today, doesn't have a lot of information, and leaves me to wonder. I wonder why the producers didn't like the pilot episode. I wonder what happened to the actors and actresses--did they go on to act somewhere else, or is this the only thing they did? Was the two episodes widely watched? Why isn't there more than two episodes? I can come up with more questions. --Umalee 00:38, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this article stub class?
Talk:Wildlife of Pakistan

message: .... and kindly contribute to these new articles when you get time, and request others too.
See Wildlife of India for reference.
Thanks
Atulsnischal 18:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Please create more "[[Wildlife of .....]]" articles for all countries.'''

message: *Asiatic Cheetah
*A more detailed account of the critically endangered “Asiatic Cheetah” (original version of current “Asiatic Cheetah” article on Wikipedia)
*Cloning
*Cryogenics
*Liquid nitrogen
*Embryo transfer
*Ex-situ conservation
*in-situ conservation
*Wildlife conservation
*Artificial insemination
*Animal husbandry
*Wildlife Conservation
*Asiatic Lion
Atulsnischal 17:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: See also
Talk:Reality (disambiguation)

message: "Reality is the state of things as they really exist" ?!
Doesn't this sound a little bit circular?
Yes, in a way, but of course reality is such a broad and foundational term it is hard to briefly describe with other terms. I guess we can change it to
Reality is generally held to be the "the state of things as they actually exist as opposed to how they possibly could exsist." Then again, we could just delete it outright, as wikipedia is not a dictionary. I think I will just remove for now. I'm not in the mood for a philosophical debate. Danski14 01:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When I created this article, I just took the definition from the first line of the article reality. I've gone ahead and made your suggested change.  Hopefully the Colbert vandalism fad will die down soon and the reality-related articles can be unprotected.  --Ed (Edgar181) 13:34, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  interesting that a Wikipedia author is against the factual importance of the wikipedia as recognized by Mr Colbert.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.40.82.38 (talk) 19:02, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

text: Great, I think the Vprotect is still reasonable. Danski14 17:37, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Korla Licheng Airport

message: This airport appears to have closed.
Josephearly (talk) 18:27, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date 
Talk:Wildlife of Sri Lanka

message: .... and kindly contribute to these new articles when you get time, and request others too.
See Wildlife of India for reference.
Thanks
Atulsnischal 18:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Please create more "[[Wildlife of .....]]" articles for all countries.'''
Talk:Eugene Siler

message: The current version of this article is almost entirely plagiarized from "The Christian Conservative Who Opposed the Vietnam War", by David T. Beito and Linda Royster Beito. Beito's article does not seem to be public domain, thus this article needs to be rewritten. --darolew (talk) 22:52, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I made an edit which rewords/paraphrases much of what Beito said, though I am unsure if it is sufficient. --darolew (talk) 23:30, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism
File talk:Zahra Kazemi before arrest.jpg

message: An image is not required for the article. Fair use should not extend to this image, even if the subject is deceased. --Bob 00:53, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Shut up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.39.13.25 (talk) 15:30, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:BFI TV 100

message: Over the past months, TV episodes have been redirected by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here . --Maniwar (talk) 01:32, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Centralized TV Episode Discussion 

message: Despite the top line of the article stating that the poll was carried out in 2000 and even a warning line in the edit box, people still keep adding post 2000 dates to the list. Why don't people read the article before changing it?Tuzapicabit (talk) 15:49, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe the warning needs to be after every closing date in the list? 46.208.245.63 (talk) 13:33, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: Why wasn't Red Dwarf included on this list?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pickuptha'Musket (talk • contribs) 17:16, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess for the same reasons thousands of other programmes weren't included as well. Bob talk 19:55, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: ''[[Red Dwarf]]''

message: Please continue it. The BBC News article in the "Further reading" section is a good place to start, to correct unsourced text. Unfortunately, a great deal of content in the section describing how the poll was done appears to come from another source, other than the two listed or that BBC News source not yet cited. That is, some editorial forensics must take place, to solve the issues with WP:OR and WP:VERIFY caused by the sloppiness of the earlier editors. 2601:246:C700:9B0:7573:9C20:A653:9660 (talk) 05:44, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think any post 2000 dates should be added, because the shows were only judged up till 2000. To give an example, I don't think Ab Fab would be as high as it is if the post 2000 episodes were included.Tuzapicabit (talk) 20:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourcing of article has begun
Talk:Wildlife of Iran

message: For information, we have already something regarding Wildlife in Iran here: Geography of Iran#Flora and Fauna. Any contribution is welcome.69.116.234.208 16:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

message: .... and kindly contribute more info  to these new articles when you get time, and request others too.
See Wildlife of India for reference.
Thanks
Atulsnischal 18:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: great initiative!69.116.234.208 19:31, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Please create more "[[Wildlife of .....]]" articles for all countries.'''

message: *Asiatic Cheetah
*A more detailed account of the critically endangered “Asiatic Cheetah” (original version of current “Asiatic Cheetah” article on Wikipedia)
*Cloning
*Cryogenics
*Liquid nitrogen
*Embryo transfer
*Ex-situ conservation
*in-situ conservation
*Wildlife conservation
*Artificial insemination
*Animal husbandry
*Wildlife Conservation
*Asiatic Lion
Atulsnischal 17:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: See also

message: Dolphins are listed as one one of the endangered species on this page. Worldwide, not all dophins are endangered. Clarification is needed as to which species is being referred to. Mjmiskin (talk) 21:12, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  endangered dolphins
Talk:Matmice

message: Removed "Matmice often had periods when it was not possible to get in to edit your homepage, usually this only lasted a day or two. But sometimes the periods of time lasted a week or so. The error was not exactly informative: "Internal Server Error... Please contact the server administrator, webmasters@matmice.com and inform them of the time the error occurred..." But do e-mail them when you cannot edit your page," since it has too much personal opinion. Rammi (talk) 17:06, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wildlife of Afghanistan

message: .... and kindly contribute to these new articles when you get time, and request others too.
See Wildlife of India for reference.
Thanks
Atulsnischal 18:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Please create more "[[Wildlife of .....]]" articles for all countries.'''

message: *Asiatic Cheetah
*A more detailed account of the critically endangered “Asiatic Cheetah” (original version of current “Asiatic Cheetah” article on Wikipedia)
*Cloning
*Cryogenics
*Liquid nitrogen
*Embryo transfer
*Ex-situ conservation
*in-situ conservation
*Wildlife conservation
*Artificial insemination
*Animal husbandry
*Wildlife Conservation
*Asiatic Lion
Atulsnischal 17:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: See also
Talk:Frederick Kroesen

message: Kroesen spoke at a seminar this past weekend and their hand-out added the following to his bio:General Kloesen fought in WWII with the 254th Infantry Regiment of the 63rd Infantry Division. He was a company grade officer, serving as platoon leader and company commander, in the fighting in the Colmar Pocket and into Germany. He participated in the particularly tough fighting in Jebsheim.
I'll keep my eyes out for a citation on this. --Habap (talk) 16:11, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it in the 82nd Airborne book via google books. --Habap (talk) 17:16, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: WWII details
Talk:Artillery of the middle ages

message: I have requested pictures for this page months ago. I don't know where to find any or I would have done it myself months ago and it'd be done.
I need pictures of ballisti,trebuchets,exc.Ebell 01:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is :Image:Ballista.gif and :Image:Replica catapult.jpg. You can place them in the article with something like .--Commander Keane 01:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  You can also find additional images at Wikimedia Commons, a database of 1,160,070 media files to which anyone can contribute. You can also upload your own images, but please be aware of the images use policy. —XhantarTalk 01:22, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: help me

message: Redirected stub to Siege engine, which already covers the topic.  (SEWilco 19:53, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected
Talk:Breast disease

message: Article started to fill in gap between breast, breast cancer, and other related articles. --Aspro 01:02, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good thing. Mikael Häggström (talk) 13:25, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article

message: I have assessed this article as a stub on the grounds that it has three complete sentences and contains a stub tag at the bottom of the page.  If you mean this to be a List of conditions related to breast health instead of a normal article, then please:
#delete the stub tag in the article
#move the page to a name that follows the normal List of... convention, and
#change the WPMED assessment on the Talk page from "Stub" to "List"
Thanks, WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: I removed the following terminology list to here, because I think it rather belongs to the scope of Wiktionary than Wikipedia. Before reinsertion, it should be rewritten to prose form. Mikael Häggström (talk) 13:25, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: problem is some of the terminology as it is used in literature is so badly confused it is really hard to get it right even as it is now. Richiez (talk) 20:24, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Terminology section

message: This article states that breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in women, and then gives a citation that does not provide this info. Would recommend that footnote 1 be replaced with http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs334/en/ and amend relevant sentence to state it is leading cause of cancer death in women aged 20-59 worldwide.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.65.184.201 (talk) 06:31, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect citation
Talk:Thaddeus Young

message: I did some wikifying, it might look excessive but based on my experiences on FAC and some GACs many non-Americans don't know what terms like senior or fourth grade are in Academics surprisingly. Quadzilla99 15:53, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WIkifying

message: Anyone else not think this line feels right to him or her?
"Young has become a fan favorite in Philadelphia for his hard work, defense, and potential."
852_Charlie_Papa (talk) 00:00, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Come to think of it, this entire section could use a litle bit of improvement. I'd like to clean this up a little.852_Charlie_Papa (talk) 23:57, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NBA career 

message: Is this seriously the most recent version of this article? It basically hasn't been updated since April 2009?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.245.53.204 (talk) 02:25, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates? 

message: 89.178.40.189 (talk) 14:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height
Talk:Them vs. You vs. Me

message: i hope finger eleven disbands before they release a remix album from tip.when they were good......
Dance-punk? Really? Somehow I doubt it.
Fail 75.42.216.114 (talk) 20:48, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

message: Does anyone have any idea why the album's title track would omitted from releases outside Canada?  That just doesn't make a lot of sense to me.  And not just for my curiosity's sake either--it would make a good bit of trivia for the article as well. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DigiFluid (talk • contribs) 09:42, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title track
Talk:Sherira ben Hanina

message: "Post-Talmudic geonim" was removed from the page on the basis that geonim are necessarily post-Talmudic. I think this was a wrong move: it is useful to define and link terms that will be unfamiliar to the average reader. The article as it was left gave no clue to anyone who doesn't already know that Gaon is not a personal name, nor what it means. So I am restoring the word geonim. - Jmabel | Talk 01:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geonmin
Talk:Flood insurance

message: "Unfortunately, in flood insurance, the numbers of claimants is larger than the available number of persons interested in protecting their property from the peril, which means that most private insurers view the probability of generating a profit from providing flood insurance as being remote."
Objectively the above statement does not make sense. By definition, a claimant must be someone who has previously purchased that particular insurance policy. It stands to reason, then, that anyone who is a claimant would have been "interested in protecting their property from [flood] peril...". Therefore, you cannot have more claimants than people who have purchased or is interested in purchasing the policy. This statement is thus factually incorrect and ambiguous in meaning. 
I think what the author meant to say or communicate is that the proportion of claimants to the total size of the insured pool is high enough that generating a profit is unlikely. In other words, most people who buy flood insurance will end up using it thus making the policy economically unviable. 
SBR249 (talk) 17:56, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: Why is the US Federal Flood Insurance program here said to be "controversial" ?
What is the controversy ?
:As the insurer of last resort, this program effectively sanctifies risk prone areas that other insurers won't touch. It basically leaves the US taxpayer on the hook to cover risks that no one else will.  See moral hazard for more on this.--Hooperbloob 06:31, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: An interesting view. Three things --
1. Moral Hazards - Considering its behavior towards its insureds generally, when was the insurance industry concerned with moral behavior at all ?  It appears that for-profit insurers cannot, virtually by definition, indulge in moral behavior toward both its insureds and its stockholders as those insurers and their relationships to those parties are presently constituted. 
2. Political Hazards -  When their is no insurance at all, those who are in effect insured by the taxpayers are those who can wield sufficient political muscle to open the gates of the treasury.  How is that superior to the situation in which the insureds at least contribute something to the kitty. 
3. Structure - Federal Flood Insurance could be structured to present the true costs to the insured.  Assuming that it does not (I do not know one way or the other, for a fact), then is this not just an example of another form of political hazard ?
I use the term "moral" in the economic sense -- but I think that we need a different term for "morale" -- since both insured and insurers do engage in immoral conduct. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.220.21.92 (talk) 08:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversial

message: I've heard that most people avoid flood insurance because it is cost preventative. 169.233.57.251 (talk) 19:58, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cost
Talk:The Five Ancestors

message: The plot summary is waaaaay too long.  I have never heard of this series, so it will be difficult to tell what is what.  I will try to fix it a little. Mynameisnotpj (talk) 12:42, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: Where have you been? Hiding under a rock? The Five Ancestors is like the best series in the world...You gotta read it! FYI- The last book is out and I can hardly wait to READ IT! It actually follows a story line and is about Ancient China and how people used to actually fight with their fists instead of guns.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.125.111.203 (talk) 22:03, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Great Series

message: I don't think it's the quality of the book that is up for debate, but the amount this page will actually be looked at.  In any case, the individual book descriptions are all copied directly from random house's website. I'm new here, so I'm unsure whether that is valid, but I don't think so.  In any case, this page definitely needs citations.  I will try to work on it, but I'm going to leave the descriptions up, at least temporarily. K1i2r3i4t5o (talk) 17:39, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations
Talk:Sagebrush (disambiguation)

message: Shouldn't there be a separate article on "Sagebrush (plant)", with the list of species on it?
Hamamelis (talk) 11:34, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In the interest of expanding knowledge, I've created this page. Pointing people away from the disambiguation page to only one of at least twenty species known collectively as "sagebrush" (see here) serves to contract knowledge, it seems to me, and gives the false impression of accuracy (in that it presupposes the seeker's intent). It also defeats the purpose of having disambiguation pages in the first place. Peace,Hamamelis (talk) 12:13, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate article
Talk:Ike! Godman

message: Should I put down when Yuke! Godman was pulled from reruns.Kongsaurus12 01:17, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reruns

message: Is Godman and Greenman's company, Toho?67.175.138.202 03:03, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Godman's Production Company

message: Should I add Bullman in the cameo list, because he was in Ultraman Ace.67.175.138.202 21:52, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bullman

message: If the show is "Yuke! Godman"(Fight! Godman), then why is the article called "Ike! Godman"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cabbage-Sama (talk • contribs) 16:04, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ike?
Talk:PS4 (disambiguation)

message: We should update this page... Tome711 01:53, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: I appreciate your contributions; however, please note that the correct title for the article is (to my knowledge) indisputably PlayStation 4, with PS4 being merely a commonly-used abbreviation. I understand that the PlayStation 4 article is (as of February 2006) "deleted and protected to prevent re-creation"; if you disagree with this decision, please contact the responsible administrators rather than attempt to circumvent it by re-creating the article under alternative titles. Ayla 17:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Following 202.71.240.18's removal of the entry for PlayStation 4, I shall be leaving the page, for the time being, with solely the Phantasy Star: The End of the Millennium reference. If anyone feels it appropriate to change the page into a redirection to the latter article, feel free to go ahead and change it. I would personally advise against it since the page would have to be converted back to a disambiguation page when (if) the PlayStation 4 is officially announced. Ayla 13:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Kindly refer to the talk page for PlayStation 4 before re-introducing the disambiguation entry for the article. If you believe that the PlayStation 4 article should be re-created, please discuss it on the said talk page. If you believe that the disambiguation entry should be included on this page even though the article remains non-existent, please state your justification here before adding it. Ayla 12:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation Page

message: I have now updated the page, accordingly, to what I have read. Sony have officially given details about the PlayStation 4. Please do not remove any of the information as it is original, ideal information and a reliable source. I am also requesting that this page be moved to PlayStation 4. Although the page has been blocked, could any administrator (who now run the page) please move it for me?  Mike |talk 19:35, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The page was redirected back to the PlayStation article but was moved back here since that article does not even mention the term PlayStation 4 meaning there is no section or even info on that subject.--70.24.208.34 (talk) 22:05, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: PS4
Talk:Reinterpretation

message: The definition here is hard to understand. When phrases are elided isn't the final note of one phrase the beginning note of the second phrase?
2601:6:7180:73B:8B7:A082:9DAC:41C9 (talk) 15:27, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: elision

message: Is not elide or elision sometimes used (in a singing - that is,  musical - context) to describe the slurring or sliding from a lower tone to a higher tone? 68.124.188.158 01:29, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Slide
Talk:Lanzhou Zhongchuan International Airport

message: Subject article lists the ICAO code as ZLAN
World Aero Data lists it as ZLLL
?
HieronymusHadrianus (talk) 08:22, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ICAO Code 

message: Can someone make a map for the sidebar to show where the airport is located with respect to Lanzhou city centre? That would seem more useful that showing the location in China.
Sdk16420 (talk) 12:23, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of Airport to Lanzhou city centre