lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Zakaria Amara

message: Much reporting on this topic is handicapped by a Canadian-wide publication ban, although I'll quote the judge who issued the 2006 ban that "The ban does not apply to information obtained outside the court". Any information I put on these pages is footnoted to its legitimate source, and nothing comes from any personal knowledge, discussions or attendance at legal hearings. Sherurcij (speaker for the dead)  03:46, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Publication Ban
Talk:Zakariya Essabar

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:17, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 
Talk:Qenna

message: This article is the result of a mistaken reading of Budge's Book of the Dead which identifies Nehebka as the goddess of revivified matter. Qenna was a male human merchant, not a goddess. -- 71.34.42.234 (talk) 17:10, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree this article should probably be deleted. The article was only created in the first place because of a mistake. -- 138.192.30.178 (talk) 18:53, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistake

message: I don't think it should be deleted.  Problems are:
1.  There are many persons named Qenna known to Eyptology.  For instance:
A workman at Deir el-Medina, the village housing personnel who prepared tombs in the Valley of the Kings, Qenna son of Prehotep (Davies, 1999, p. 267).
Another Deir el-Medina workman, Qenna the son of Anhurkhawy.  This Qenna had a wife named Meretseger and daughters Tanodjemkhaba and Nefertariemheb (Davies, 1999, p. 22).
:Davies, Benedict. 1999. Who's Who at Deir el-Medina. Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten. Leiden.
2.  Is article about Book of Dead of Qenna, or about person?
The Qenna referred to in the article is the one for whom a notable papyrus copy of the Book of the Dead was recovered.  It is unclear, and unlikely, this is either of Davies' Qennas.  He lived during late Dyn. 18 or early Dyn 19 and is identified as "the Osiris merchant Qenna" (wsjr Swtj qnnA) in his papyrus.  The Qenna papyrus, now at Leiden (Rijksmuseum, Leemans T2), included an unusual passage about an afterlife place called "the house of hearts."  See van Dijk (1995) for discussion of Qenna's dates and the house of hearts:
:Jacobus van Dijk. 1995. "Entering the House of Hearts: An Addition to Chap. 151 in the Book of the Dead of Qenna." In OMRA 75, pp. 7-12.  This document is at Rijksmuseum van Oudheden in Leiden, Netherlands. It is catalogued in Worldcat and at the museum website.
3.  Get rid of E.A. Wallis Budge as a reference.  While pioneering, his work is considered unreliable and has been superseded by better-informed scholarship.
Jessegalebaker (talk) 04:37, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Mistake:  Qenna and his papyrus.
Talk:Qift

message: No mention of the pre-dynastic Min Temple discovered by Flinders Petrie? The remains of three Min statues shown in the Ashmolean Museum are regarded by some as the earliest known monumental statues.
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/museums-static/digitalegypt//koptos/index.html
http://herboyves.blogspot.de/2015/03/egypte-les-mysteres-des-debuts.html
--BjKa (talk) 15:10, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-dynastic Min Temple
Talk:Tuya (queen)

message: What exactly is this supposed to mean?:
"In her tomb, Tuya "was stripped of the first part of her name to become plain Tuya for eternity; the loss of the prefix Mut- suggests that her death had ended in an almost divine earthly status.""
It's apparently a quote from a book, but it doesn't actually seem to mean anything. ForWhomTheSunShines (talk) 20:48, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing language
Talk:R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz

message: What in rootin'-tootin' flippin'-flappin' tarnation is going on with wiki these days?? Everywhere I read, everyone is being accused of antisemitism! 
OK, I mean, if they guy was an antisemite, then of course that should be noted. But reading through the article, it's all secondary sources, hearsay, and "My brother Gus told me that"s... For Neptune's sake, if you're going to make such an accusation, there damn well ought to be better evidence than the contestable junk here! The guy's mother was a Jew! 
Before anyone starts hauling out the battle armor, I have no stake in this game other than to say that waving that banner at everyone who ever wore anything resembling a Nazi uniform (for god's sake, people!) utterly cheapens the epithet. That is a fact, and you ignore it at your peril (obviously speaking to those who choose to do this, not the community), as the long-term outcome will obviously be the very opposite of what is sought. 
Every single instance of the accusation on this page should be heavily qualified. This is why after all this time and all this work, people still don't respect teh Wiki. Do as you please, but... for the record, I emphatically urge you to reconsider the current course, to modify this entry, and in the future think longer and harder about how lightly you paint everyone with that brush. Wouldn't it be an irony and a shame if we ever had to modify the well-known quote to end with: "...when they called me an antisemite, there was no one left to appeal to"...?
My $0.02
Ta,
Pimpoosh (talk) 00:34, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The phrase "described him as" is already in the article. That's clearly a qualification. Dougweller (talk) 05:51, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Everyone's an Anti-Semite! Which is to say, no one is, if you keep this up... 

message: For your information, It is not born december 7 in Alsace-Lorraine but the 30 has Asnières-sur-Seine ! See the page in French please. Best regards. Licorne37 (talk) 20:57, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth 
Talk:Zandra Rhodes

message: This article has been considerably improved in term of reduction of peacock terms. Still, it's not there yet. For example, consider this sentence: "Her designs have always been clear, creative statements, dramatic but graceful, bold but feminine." Red Plum 08:10, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Peacock Continues

message: Can a source be provided which links her to the Tories? 2.98.183.194 (talk) 22:41, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conservative Party
Talk:Zao Wou-Ki

message: Please redirect "Zao Wu Ki" here as it seems to be an alternative spelling : .Zigzig20s 20:19, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirect 
Talk:Ramesseum

message: i need it for a school project. 216.125.47.164 (talk) 17:10, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  question, what is inside it?
Talk:Renenutet

message: Uh, this article has problems. With no sources cited whatsoever, I cannot accept the claims about the mystical name-giving personification of childbirth philosophy. Richard H. Wilkinson's Complete Gods and Goddesses of Ancient Egypt says she is a goddess of harvest and agriculture and that her name means "snake who nourishes." He mentions nothing whatsoever about her giving names, and her only connection to childbirth according to him is from being a nurse to children, later identified with Meskhenet and eventually with Shait during the Late Period. This thing about names looks like some non-expert's total speculation based on a speculative but incorrect etymology. 209.162.56.97 (talk) 19:04, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed content

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Rannut. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 3#Rannut until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 17:14, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Rannut" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Retjenu

message: — Assignment last updated by Johnstoncl (talk) 18:23, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: 311_History of Ancient Egypt

message: My problem with the definition (see above) proved to originate in some "imaginative editing", where the ref didn't cover half of what it was alleged to say, and new, anachronistic terms were introduced.
I have now rewritten that section based mainly on the same Steindorff & Seele source, plus I. Singer on Amurru. The info and wikilinked terms added by fellow editor, but unsupported by the source, are here. Some are possibly correct and thus useful, but must be sourced to be reintroduced.
:"The borders of Retjenu shifted with time, but it generally consisted of three regions."
Did they shift with time?
:"The southernmost was Djahy, which had about the same boundaries as Canaan"
Define Canaan! Definition varied, so nonsense. 
:"from Gaza in the south, to Tartous in the north"
Gaza Strip, i.e. Rafah, as S border, is as far as I remember correct. Tartous as N border, I don't know.
:"The Akkar district south of Tartous in Syria was designated Amurru, the land of the Amorites."
Akkar? Links to modern Lebanese district. Tartous? Source! Amurru was NOT the land of the Amorites, but one Amorite kingdom.
:"Lebanon proper was located in the middle, between the Mediterranean and the Beqaa Valley, the ancient Coele-Syria."
"Lebanon proper" means nothing, didn't exist before the French created such an entity. Forgets to include Anti-Lebanon (Steindorff does, it seems). Coele-Syria is a term from a different era (and "ancient" covers everything older than modern era in English), plus it had 2 different definitions. Arminden (talk) 15:51, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Material not supported by source parked here
Talk:Zbigniew Religa

message: *He's categorized as a cancer patient but my quick skim didn't see reference to cancer in this article. Canuckle 19:44, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cancer?

message: Was Dr. Religa really an atheist? Cassandro (talk) 20:24, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. He said it clearly. Polish citizen.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.10.185.230 (talk) 08:57, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atheist? 

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 23:52, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]]
Talk:Zbigniew Robert Promiński

message: And I quote "the tempo of which approaches the 260 bpm mark." - 260 is not particularly fast, how accurate is this ? It doesn't seem right to me.
You try playing 16th bass drum notes at 260bpm then.
(Innie721 14:34, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  BPM ? 

message: Maby it should be noted that he used to/still blow fire on stage at the beginning of every act as a sort of signature to his name, Inferno?
== Cymbals ==
This Wikipedia article states "Inferno" uses Paiste Cymbals but this and this webpage says he uses Sabian cymbals.
Also the source number 5: http://www.spaundrums.com/images/endorsers/inferno.htm is dead  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pompato (talk • contribs) 12:52, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Blowing fire

message: This Wikipedia article states "Inferno" uses Paiste Cymbals but this and this webpage says he uses Sabian cymbals.
Also the source number 5: http://www.spaundrums.com/images/endorsers/inferno.htm is dead  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pompato (talk • contribs) 12:52, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cymbals 

message: Hey,
Can somebody change the article title to just Zbigniew Promiński? Because I can't find how to do it. Robert is his middle name, no one ever calls him by that name. I mean, his name is Zbigniew, not 'Zbigniew Robert'.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gunthervandeven (talk • contribs) 22:53, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title article
Talk:Zbigniew Ziobro

message: PaintedCarpet (talk) 16:07, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy edit 

message: The text “ Ziobro has also announced that he was considering the introduction of a law to target language used to refer to Poland's role in the Holocaust.” was removed because
# it’s outdated
# what a politician says he “might” do isn’t encyclopedic and hence UNDUE.
More importantly I just checked the source (here it is - there was no link provided originally) and shockingly, Ziobro, is not even mentioned in the piece. So this is a pretty blatant misrepresentation and a BLP vio, on top of everything else. Volunteer Marek  21:15, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding your last point, Zioboro is mentioned in the printed magazine. The link only provides the beginning of the article, as you can see at the bottom of the page: To read more, subscribe to Ami, meaning that the rest of the article (which includes mention of Ziobro) is available only to subscribers. I will not argue on your first two points; so if someone will remove the paragraph, I will not edit-war. I, personally, prefer to leave it the way it is. Thanks for listening, -- -- -- 21:35, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: oh, I see, thanks for clarifying that. As to the broader issue IF Ziobro proposes some law like that I would have absolutely no problem with including it in the article. But this is from two years ago and afaik he hasn’t so it’s not particularly encyclopedic. Volunteer Marek  22:05, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a duplicitious argument. The law was passed a few weeks later as described in , , and . After a large backlash it was softened a bit as written in Poland’s Holocaust Law Weakened After ‘Storm and Consternation’ (New York Times), that writes that "it was Mr. Ziobro’s own ministry that had drafted the law, and he personally had voted for it as a member of Parliament."Mellow Boris (talk) 05:47, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Dude, that’s even LESS of a reason to include that sentence as written. “Joe Biden said he might run for President”. Volunteer Marek  05:59, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Dude, I fixed it . You can fix it to "Joe Biden was elected president" or "Zbigniew Ziobro was the driving force behind Poland's controversial amendment to the Act on the Institute of National Remembrance which outlawed speech on Polish-Nazi cooperation". Both are large events in their careers.Mellow Boris (talk) 06:05, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you actually didn’t. You were also violating the 500/30 restriction. Volunteer Marek  06:11, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ami magazine
Talk:Zdeněk Miler

message: As a child from the 1960s I'd like to add here that I'm surprised this page doesn't mention Miler's views, which he very subtly brought forward through his Krtek cartoons. I've been brought up with them (I was born in Yugoslavia). Zdenek was one of the first to propagate pro environmental, pro nature, anti-pollution, anti-war, even anti-capitalism tainted stories to children. In some of his stories it's very obvious he was trying to warn kids about the dangers of destroying forests, expanding cities, over-consumption, over-population, waste disposal issues, so-called 'technological solutions' against global warming, and he did so in a friendly manner, with superb music and taste. Many would now call him an eco-warrior, really. He wasn't an activist as such, but his way of trying to make the world a better place was through his art. He did propagate his stance on issues that even Greta Thunberg hasn't even addressed yet. He was way ahead of his time. This needs to be mentioned, I think. 89.205.131.218 (talk) 09:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello there! While I agree that it is important to mention a person's worldview or philosophy in a biographical article, unless there are credible sources to support this material, including it in the article would constitute original research, which goes against Wikipedia policy. If you have sources that you would like to include, which support what you say about Miler, please present them, and the content can definitely be added to the page. Cheers! Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 15:03, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important moral messages
Talk:Zdravko Zdravkov

message: There is apparently another Zdravko Zdravkov, also a Bulgarian, but a ski jump instructor, see this Google search. It is not clear if he is notable or if a disambiguation page is necessary. I think resolution should probably await creation of an acceptable article regarding Zdravko Zdravkov, ski jump instructor. Fred Talk 16:27, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Template:Otherpersons,  seems to be the template to use. Fred Talk 16:37, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The ski jump instructor
Talk:Scorpion I

message: We have exactly the same issue here as at Serket II. By the same token there is no justification whatsoever for renaming the predynastic king known universally to English-speaking scholarship as "Double Falcon" to "Nahe-Nahe". We simply don't know how the signs relate to this king's spoken name, and to guess like this is original research. If it was known for sure that this was how his name was said, this is how he would be known in the literature. But he isn't that I have ever seen.
The image in the infobox was inappropriate, being a statue of the goddess Serket from the tomb of the New Kingdom Pharaoh Tutankhamun, so I removed it. I furthermore renamed "Serket" to "Scorpion" throughout to conform with every independent reference I can locate on the subject. TCC (talk) (contribs) 03:34, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serket/Scorpion 

message: Who is Scorpion the 1st's predecessor Bull? Is he an attested name with no other information, or just a name a user added with no context? Trajan anntonnius (talk) 19:55, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bull
Talk:Zee Edgell

message: No pics, but a decent summary of the lady's work and importance in Belizean literature. --206.27.244.254 17:43, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can someone explain the section regarding the details of Edgell's fourth novel? As far as I am aware, she was thinking of publishing a fourth, but was still in the planning stage. And there has been no mention of it in the Belizean media.--Aaronhumes 16:28, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification 
Talk:Season of the Inundation

message: Conflict with Flooding_of_the_Nile: "Akhet was the first season of the year, between the months of June and September." Need to check other sources.
:Both pages were wrong. — LlywelynII 10:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  They are not wrong! Böri (talk) 11:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  from BBC History: The year and calendar were adjusted to the Nile and the stars. New Year was in mid July, when the river began to rise for the inundation; this coincided approximately with the reappearance of the star Sirius (Egyptian Sothis) in the sky after 70 days' invisibility. Sothis provided the astronomical anchor for the 365 day calendar. Böri (talk) 06:49, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Time

message: The dates are still confusing.  If you match the dates with the other seasons,Peret and Shemu, they do not match.  please make them agree. 145.53.175.192 (talk) 13:36, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. — LlywelynII 10:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  When? 

message: It says: "between early September and early January" but it must be June 15 - October 15 Böri (talk) 15:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Wot. — LlywelynII 10:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  You're completely wrong. / on Google you can see: Akhet was the time of flooding, it lasted from June 15 to October 15.   Böri (talk) 11:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: It says

message: The introduction of the article contradicts itself! Is the flood season from June to September or from September to January? The first paragraph suggests the former while the third paragraph suggests the latter. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 17:50, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. — LlywelynII 10:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: to keep it consistent with the other seasons. If it turns out one of the other variants was actually more common or is more accepted presently, that's peachy, but kindly include a source. — LlywelynII 10:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Main hieroglyph
Talk:Samannud

message: Semenood is the place of Sesostris the Great, The Egyptian Hercules.  Who is the Egyptian Hercules? 
SESOSTRIS THE GREAT, THE EGYPTIAN HERCULES
http://www.africaresource.com/rasta/sesostris-the-great-the-egyptian-hercules/sesostris-the-great-the-egyptian-hercules/
"Semenood is a place of some size, with the usual bazáars of the large towns of Egypt, and famous for its pottery, which is sent to Cairo. it is in latitude 30° 58' 45". Here are the mounds of Sebennytus, the city of Sem, Gem, or Gom, The Egyptian Hercules. In Coptic it is called Gemnouti, (Ϫ
Coptic symbols), which implies "Gem of God," and shows the origin of the present as well as the orthography of the ancient name; and it is remarkable that the name of the god begins with the word noute in many legends."
Modern Egypt and Thebes
(from the Public Domain Modern Egypt and Thebes: Being a Description of Egypt, Including the Information Required for Travellers in that Country, Volumen 1
Sir John Gardner Wilkinson
John Murray, 1843)
Dotti:  But Pee-Wee! What is all of this supposed to mean?! 
Pee-Wee Herman: Supposed to mean?! Supposed to mean?! I'll tell you what it's supposed to mean!Level C (talk) 20:46, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Egyptian Hercules 

message: The article equates the Sebennytic branch that the city was located on with the modern Damietta branch. However, comparing between these two maps where the right branch is the Damietta branch:
The Damietta branch corresponds to the ancient Phatnitic branch, not the Sebennytic. 
A quick search online for other sources seems to affirm that this is an error.
The Medieval Nile: Route, Navigation, and Landscape in Islamic Egypt (2014) – John Cooper
Alexandria: A History and Guide – E.M. Forster
The Empire of the Ptolemies (1895)– John Pentland Mahaffy
A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography, Volume 2 (1873) – William Smith instead suggests that the Damietta branch corresponds to the Sebennytic branch up until the city of Sebennytos where it then corresponds to the course of the ancient Phatnitic branch. However, the two maps above seem to indicate that the Phatnitic branch followed the exact course of the modern-day Damietta branch and is 100% identical to it.
So is there an error in this article? Or is it more complicated and needs some clarification? Sol Pacificus (talk) 20:49, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sebennytic = Damietta branch?