Talk:Common-pool resource

message: Which term is more popular (in economics): common good or common pool resource? I have to say that during my studies I have only encountered the common good one, and common good in economics context is much more popular then common pool resource.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  01:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My sense is that they should remain seperate from the moment. CPR is a bit more specific (typically used in resource economics) and so should probably merit an article that can be linked to from other pages. Joel Kincaid 19:16, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Common Goods and CPR are different in that Common Goods are non-excludable and rivalrous by definition, whereas CPR are non-excludable only at the individual level, but excludable at the community level. This implies that the rivalry/excludability-table in various articles (as for example in the "Common Good" article) should show "Common good" instead of "Common-pool resource".Krol:k 13:35, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge common good here?

message: I removed the following section. Reason: the example does not fit the definition of a common-pool resource used in the article (global climate is not excludable and therefore a common good). The Kyoto Protocol could however be seen as an example where inter-governmental regulation and tradeable allowances in fact do not work as expected to prevent excessive pollution (CO2-emissions will eventually decrease because of Peak Oil and not due to the Kyoto Protocol; the Kyoto Protocol could at best be seen as an instrument to manage Peak Oil internationally, but not to curb emissions - or am I being too negative about that?). Krol:k (talk) 10:13, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of the section on the Kyoto Protocol and Climate Change 

message: The article states, that  
A common-pool resource typically consists of a core resource, which defines the stock variable, while providing a limited quantity of extractable fringe units, which defines the flow variable. While the core resource is to be protected or entertained in order to allow for its continuous exploitation, the fringe units can be harvested or consumed.
 
Whereas Ostrom, Gardner, Walker seem to add a third component to the consistence of CPR's - the CPR "facility". 
A CPR "facility" creates the conditions for the existence of a stock of resource units. This stock makes available a flow of resource units over time that are appropriable and subtractable in use. Ostrom, Gardner, Walker - Rules, Games & Common pool resources (1994) S. 8   How can this be understood?
Is this CPR facility the precondition for the core resource? To use the fish example: The CPR facility is a system (e.g. the ocean) that creates the condition for the existence of fish in general. The core resource (=stock variable) is a swarm of fish that can easily compensate certain losses that are attributable to fishery and the fringe units (=flow variable) is amount of fish that can be fished? Or do I get something completely wrong here? - Torstenphilipp (talk) 15:52, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the CPR facility? 

message: when reading i kind of feel that i need a reference in the section before "critique", does ostrom say this? she has studied small systems but has she also studied bigger once? if so, the statement is correct, otherwise I suggest a (ref). How do I connect this section with the ref?
All the best and keep up the good work!
Nikarvidsson (talk) 10:47, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: A proposal

message: I would like to add a section on adaptive governance to this page. Ostrom advocates the use of adaptive governance in the management of common-pool resources, especially those related to the natural environment.  The proposed section will outline briefly what adaptive governance is and the elements required to achieve it. Jrober (talk) 02:38, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Indented line I think that would be an ideal addition to this article, and provide some more balance - I presume you'll be referencing Dietz et al. (2003).  Schmalliso (talk) 15:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

text: Thank you for the suggestion, I will take that source into consideration. Jrober (talk) 14:35, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Adaptive governance

message: *Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., Stern, P. (2003). The Struggle to Govern the Commons, Science, 302(5652).  Schmalliso (talk) 15:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I was thinking of moving the chart illustrating types of goods.  On the other related pages it is under the overview and currently here it at the bottom under the references. Moving it to the overview would keep the pages looking consistent for users.Jrober (talk) 17:15, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move chart?

message: Dr. Espinola-Arredondo has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Espinola-Arredondo has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:
*Reference : Ana Espinola-Arredondo & Felix Munoz-Garcia, 2010. "Can Incomplete Information Lead to Under-exploitation in the Commons," Working Papers 2010-04, School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 13:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Espinola-Arredondo's comment on this article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Common-pool resource. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130703113927/http://economics.socialsciencedictionary.com/Environmental-Economics-Dictionary/Open_Access_Resource to http://economics.socialsciencedictionary.com/Environmental-Economics-Dictionary/Open_Access_Resource
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120802015634/http://www.ias.unu.edu/sub_page.aspx?catID=155&ddlID=299 to http://www.ias.unu.edu/sub_page.aspx?catID=155&ddlID=299
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:35, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: Common property redirects here. However, the article is about the economic definition of a type of good. Common property is more about assigned ownership rather than the properties inherent in a good. Maybe a separate article would be better? Jonpatterns (talk) 19:04, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: EDIT I've made Common property redirect to Common ownership instead as it seems a better fit. Jonpatterns (talk) 19:12, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common property