lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Broken Blossoms

message: Note: IMDb alone is not sufficient sourcing. It's a site of volunteer information, like Wikipedia, but with much less robust user editing. Anyone can go into it and say "The Chink and teh Child" is an alternate title. But there's no other reference I cand fin for this assertion. If it was a nickname used by racists, that's much different from it being the title on a marquee! 
Also, the analysis about it being an "apologia" is unsourced speculation, and as such must be either cited as an authority's analysis (saying that "so-and-so has written") or removed.  - 152.163.100.136 19:22, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Right here: The Chink and the Child --Bluejay Young 23:40, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Insuffifient sourcing, plus speculation

message: Was that the George M. Cohen Theatre (for which I can only find two references) or the George M. Cohan Theatre, founded in 1911 and the venue for many film and stage play openings? --Bluejay Young 23:42, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Theatre premiere?
Talk:Destry Rides Again

message: Needs to be reworked, it only describes half the movie. --68.209.227.3 03:57, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Worse than that, the entire section was a copy from the IMDb site. FWIW Bzuk (talk) 15:20, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Does not have an encyclopedic style : "but the bad guys lose and the rule of law wins the day." Dakseus (talk) 22:57, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a very unfinished work, go at it. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 00:25, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot description
Talk:Flash Gordon (serial)

message: In his review of the film in the 2015 reference Radio Times Guide to Films, Alan Jones describes Flash Gordon as "non-stop thrill-a-minute stuff as Flash battles one adversary after another", and he states that it is "the best of the Crabbe trilogy of Flash Gordon films". Is this passage about this or a different version?
Tadfafty (talk) 18:42, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "film"
Talk:II SS Panzer Corps

message: I can't figure out which city Bergen should link to, so anyone who knows can change it. TimBentley 00:28, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to disambiguation page
Talk:She Done Him Wrong

message: Hi, I would like to know what is her quote "Why don't you come up sometime and see me?" in  the French version. Purple Rose 18:38, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Quote

message: ... or are you just happy to see me?" A famous line from the movie. Happily ever after 23:23, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Is that a gun in your pocket, ...
Talk:Unitary Executive

message: I have broken up this text a little:
:The theory of the unitary executive spans a range of views.  At one end it says that the President, i.e. the unitary executive, has the power to appoint, direct and remove executive officers.  He also has the power to interpret the law as it applies to the executive.  At the other end of the spectrum it has a very strong President with a Congress and Judiciary that give great deference to the President.
The thing is, this isn't a spectrum of views on a single issue, because it's two entirely separate issues, on each of which there might be a range of views. I realize that no Senator on either side who has mentioned this in the Alito hearings seems to have the faintest idea what the term means, but we should be clear here as to exactly what issues are implicated, lest it become accidentally POV. Anyway, I think the new version is more accurate, more descriptive, and NPOV.
Simon Dodd 00:30, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Should this article not merge with Unitary Executive theory?--Nomen Nescio 18:43, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Very possibly - I think there's some good material in both, though, so it isn't just a question of deleting one and going with the other. I suppose the question is: should this article be merged into that, or vice-versa? I think that "unitary executive theory" is probably a better description, so I will merge this article into that one, and redirect as appropriate. Simon Dodd 20:26, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A bit of a change around
Talk:The Heiress

message: I would have liked to have seen the insider story about how the stunning Olivia de Havilland was transformed into a plain-faced girl for this movie.  I didn't believe it was her.
Nei1 (talk) 18:05, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Plain Face
Talk:The Life and Times of Rosie the Riveter

message: When was the film actually released? IMDB gives 1980 as the release date (as it also says in the infobox here), whereas the production company's website (scroll down to about the middle of Connie Field's bio) says it was released in 1981. So which date should be kept as the correct one? 85.177.254.39 18:09, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Allmovie, The New York Times, and the Library of Congress all list it as released in 1980, so I think we should leave it at that. Kaldari (talk) 20:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Film release date?'''
Talk:Loggerheads, Staffordshire

message: I notice the TB sanatorium is stated to have been begun in 1962, a mere seven years before its year of closure (1969).  Is 1962 correct or do I discern a misprint?  I suspect the latter because I have read (more than a decade agao) of accounts of its being active between the World Wars but forgot when it was stated to have been founded.Cloptonson (talk) 19:22, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Loggerheads Sanatorium - historical query
Talk:The Twelve Chairs (1970 film)

message: The Mel Brooks film was not made directly from the original novel as written in Russian, it was made from the English translation "Diamonds To Sit On". This is clearly stated in the opening credits.
89.160.82.254 (talk) 17:44, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: The source

message: I took out the following paragraph:
Although this film is has some amusing sequences and a fun opening number written by Mel Brooks, it is considered by fans of the novel to be a very poor and embarrassing adaptation that doesn't capture its Soviet satirical flair, or the bleakness and earnest social criticism in its humor.
I took it out because it is original research since it is not a quote from a prestigious magazine or author or anyone of note. Or, if it is, that is not indicated anywhere. Qaz 01:51, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Paragraph

message: "...only after perpetrating plenty of cons to pay for the lengthy enterprise..."
This is taken from the article on the story but doesn't really apply to the events in the film - only once in the film do they perpetrate a con to raise money (otherwise they never have any)
"The two hide in the building until after closing..."
In the film they leave and reenter the building through the window after closing time.
Gr8white (talk) 03:19, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: discrepancies
Category talk:American people of Irish descent

message: Please note that per WP:CATGRS, ethnic-occupational crosscategories should only exist when that combination is already recognized as a notable cultural or academic topic by sources outside of Wikipedia. For example, there has to be something uniquely encyclopedic about being an Irish American criminal or an Irish American singer, and you have to be able to write an encyclopedia article about how those are different from being an Italian American criminal or an Italian American singer. If it isn't possible to view them as being fundamentally different phenomena, then the crosscategory is not permitted. Bearcat 03:29, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: I just noticed that the various categories of Irish-Americans by occupation has been deleted. I can't speak to other groups, but I was surprised that, as pointed out by another editor, a category for politicians was not retained. To this I would add ones for clergy and law enforcement. From a historical perspective, these are the three traditional fields in which this population had a significant presence and made a major contribution to American history. Anybody else think that they should be created again? Daniel the Monk (talk) 16:13, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Category by occupation
Talk:Silent Movie

message: Quote: 'During the sneak preview of the silent movie, a man is shown smoking a cigar, while the words "Ars Est Pecunia" (Latin for "Art Is Money") are displayed. This a parody of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer's famous lion and "Ars Gratia Artis" (Art for art's sake) motto.'
Isn't that Sid Caesar himself? WHPratt (talk) 23:53, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Fake MGM logo
Talk:High Anxiety

message: Hi,
Could we please remove the spoilers from the Cast section?
While watching the movie (about one hour into it), I decided to check the actors - and when I reached this page - it gave away details such as what the nurse was scheming in the movie. That spoiled my movie experience - I hadn't even reached that point yet.
Just a request for consideration. 
Thanks!
- Anurag  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.30.242.82 (talk) 06:27, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion: Can We Remove Some Extraneous Details from the Cast Section?
Talk:Life Stinks

message: Mel Brooks, 
The last of (,GRTEAT)skitch comedy! No heirs, Mel?   
Classic man for classic comedies!
No DOUBT! 107.127.11.12 (talk) 22:31, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  M
Talk:Dracula: Dead and Loving It

message: Is this section strictly necessary? I think it would be questionable even for a serious movie (since there are typically too many differences to list), but comparing a farce to the 100+ year-old book it was based on (and was it really based on the book?  Or on the movies that book later inspired?) is just plain silly.  --Lode Runner 11:00, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Deviations from the novel" 

message: Shout! Factory will be releasing the movie on Blu-ray for the first time on November 23, 2021.https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Dracula-Dead-and-Loving-It-Blu-ray/47114/https://www.dvdsreleasedates.com/movies/3588/Dracula:-Dead-and-Loving-It-(1995).html
:--XSMan2016 (talk) 05:17, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home media
Talk:The Thief of Bagdad (1940 film)

message: I wonder if a script is available anywhere? Or even just some quotes? Unsigned comment by 80.2.203.199 15:32, 21 July 2001 (UTC)
replies: text: Alexander Korda's The Thief of Bagdad, An Arabian Fantasy. Philip Leibfried and Malcolm Willits. Hollywood, Calif.: Hypostyle Hall Publishers, 2004. ISBN: 0-967-52531-4. Not a full script, but an exploration of how it was made. It does include quite a few quotes and lots of pictures. I've added the details to the main article -- SteveCrook 20:10, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Script?  

message: Why is Vincent Korda not mentioned in the first sentence and in the info box, if he won the Academy Award? --78.34.4.52 (talk) 09:16, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vincent Korda 

message: Is anyone in a position to summarise the financial success (or otherwise) of the the film? --Legis (talk - contribs) 18:26, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Financial information
Talk:The Spy in Black

message: This film wasn't a Quota Quicky. It wasn't made by Columbia (despite what the TCM page referenced says), it was made by London Films and was distributed by Columbia. I'll remove the misleading and incorrect paragraph -- SteveCrook (talk) 11:42, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production 

message: It's obvious why the British should attempt to prevent the escape of the German U-Boat captain, it was because he was a German U-Boat captain who was trying to escape with his crew. I'll remove that section -- SteveCrook (talk) 11:45, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuity
Talk:The Small Back Room

message: An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, :Image:SBR03.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  J Milburn (talk) 10:05, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image listed for deletion

message: Removing the statement The book and film are credited for popularising the term "boffin" and "backroom boys".
;This is not supported by the reference given, and the term "Boffin" does not appear in the book. . . Rcawsey (talk) 10:31, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Boffin
Talk:Gone to Earth (film)

message: Jon Rob added a comment to say that it was filmed around Ludlow as well as Much Wenlock. It wasn't really. Ludlow castle appears in the background of the point-to-point scenes but they are filmed at Eyton. Ludlow castle is miles away so it must be a clever fake, probably a hanging miniature, added to give the scene a dramatic background. There are some lists of the locations used as well as some "Then & Now" photo comparisons on the Powell & Pressburger site - SteveCrook 16:20, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ludlow

message: Can't someone upload a decent English-language poster or DVD/VHS cover? Softlavender (talk) 00:53, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Go on then. I've given up trying to put images on Wikipedia. I did so for a load of films, taking care to follow all the rules. But then they changed the rules. So I made sure that all the images I had uploaded complied with the new rules - and they changed the rules again. I gave up -- SteveCrook (talk) 09:08, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have replaced the modern DVD cover with a contemporaneous English theatrical release poster, which was not available at the time I originally uploaded the Spanish poster.  I assume that this will suffice for all parties. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:23, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are we using a Spanish-language poster for the article?
Talk:They're a Weird Mob (film)

message: Chris Keating, do you have any proof that it was Liza Goddard playing the girl on the ferry?I presume you mean this one at  -- SteveCrook (talk) 15:21, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've deleted it until it's sourced. BMK (talk) 17:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

text: The good people at BritMovie all think that it's Liza so I've added her and Ken James as the man with her -- SteveCrook (talk) 11:41, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

text: So you should correct the entry for Ken James and describe him as the bell-boy (uncredited) -- SteveCrook (talk) 17:46, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liza Goddard??
Talk:The Boy Who Turned Yellow

message: An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, :Image:Boy Who Turned Yellow screenshot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  J Milburn (talk) 09:35, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image:Boy Who Turned Yellow screenshot.jpg listed for deletion
Talk:Siddhi

message: if one is born with a siddhi of clairvoyance, how does one bring it under control?
Is siddhi a cognate of the Irish sidhe?Celsiana 04:47, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't think that this section really fits with the rest of the article, which is about the Hindu idea of siddhis. Any other thoughts? Sethie 18:20, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A Western Version

message: The section "Eight Primary Siddhis" currently lists only five. 15:33, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing Siddhis?

message: I removed the copy edit tag. The grammar, spelling and tone seems all good. Cohesion not so much, but I think the confusing tag covers it. Tripnoted (talk) 06:02, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy edit

message: The Madhavacharya who is the author of Sarva Darshana Samgraha is not the founder of Dvaitam. This Madhavacharya is actually another name of Vidyaranya, the Guru of Vijayanagara's founders and a Shankaracharya of Sringeri KarthikSsm (talk) 15:59, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Madhavacharya 

message: Decades ago I read a number of books that talked about the Siddhis, and renouncing them was often an important step. They were often referred to as "distractions" or "obstacles" on the path to enlightenment. I think this is a supremely relevant aspect and I'd like to include it, but I haven't found sources. Anyone? Єlєvє<SMALL>N</SMALL> єvє<SMALL>N</SMALL>||иэvэ иэvэl3 05:31, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renouncing the Siddhis 

message: In the section Patanjali's Yoga Sutras, the list of siddhis given aren't siddhis at all. In fact they're are a list of the Niyamas, the second "limb" of Ashtanga Yoga. The niyamas are a list of observances to be performed by the practitioner of Yoga, and have nothing to do with Siddhis. Since the classical ashta-siddhis are given right below, I'll remove this list altogether.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magnetar47 (talk • contribs) 10:46, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect list of siddhis 

message: get the chance and you know I was going through this with my sister was just a little bit of it all up and get it from you and the other one day you can. 106.66.236.232 (talk) 10:37, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:To Be or Not to Be (1942 film)

message: Once the stage version opens on Broadway, it will need its own article.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:57, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Stage version

message: There should be a separate article about the upcoming Broadway production, perhaps called To Be or Not to Be (play).  This article should be about the 1942 film.  --rogerd (talk) 21:59, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Broadway play

message: My intervention was aimed at making the plot shorter and easier to consult - thus to let any reader understand what the movie is about with a quick read.
The new version seems to me too detailed. Encyclopedia entries about movies usually do not reach this level of detail.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sostene (talk • contribs) 15:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You went too far.  I've trimmed it down a bit. BMK (talk) 00:24, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Plot 

message: Greenberg, who is implicitly Jewish
Just saying: I think that is a rather, shall I say, pedantic, use of "implicit". It is quite true that the words "Jew" and "Judaism" are not said in the film, but how much more explicit than
*Greenberg: What you are I would not eat.
*The Actor who later plays the general: How dare you call me a ham?!
can you get?--2001:A61:260C:C01:74B1:7729:6255:BA1A (talk) 00:06, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Only implicitly Jewish?

message: How come there is no mention that the lead actress Carole Lombard died after production was finished but before the movie premiered? I think it bears mentioning, especially as she's a great actress (don't take my words for it, but that's what critics have said about her acting skills) 196.70.253.175 (talk) 15:22, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carole Lombard's Death
Talk:Woodstock (film)

message: The reason I listed this film as high importance is that it was deemed culturally significant by the U.S. Library of Congress and selected for preservation in the National Film Registry. Hope that's a sufficient criterion. Cott12 Talk 14:12, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance
Talk:Process function

message: I like this terminology. Where does it come from?
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.43.126.224 (talk) 00:47, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin?

message: This version of the article says "A property can be identified as a process (or path) function if it is in lower case."  That doesn't seem right.  For instance heat is a process function but I've always seen it denoted in the uppercase:  Q .  The only time I've seen it in lower case is as a unit quantity (heat per area:  q ). I have removed the sentence. Riick (talk) 00:40, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "It depends on the heat done ": that doesn't make sense either. DS Belgium (talk) 12:20, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lower case? 

message: Last paragraph says:
<<Path functions depend on the path taken to reach one state from another. Different routes give different quantities. Examples of path functions include work, heat, and distance. In contrast to path functions, state functions are independent of the path taken.>>
Distance, being defined as the length of the shortest path between to points, is independent of path by definition. The article should talk instead about 'length'. I'm going to change it.
Jose Brox  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.30.25.6 (talk) 14:17, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distance is not a process function 

message: Can this article be renamed to Path function, which is the usual terminology in physical chemistry textbooks? We could still mention Process function as a synonym in the article. But the use of Process function as the article name invites confusion with the engineering term Process variable, which apparently includes state functions such as temperature and pressure! Dirac66 (talk) 11:01, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It is p-function, where p can refer to either process or path. 77.83.254.178 (talk) 07:12, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to Path function?
Talk:Tonite Lets All Make Love in London

message: I've got a CD version of this soundtrack, that is not See For Miles label's, it's Immediate label's. It's track listing and tracks' lenghts are a bit different that in See For Miles CD version this article talks about. For an example, the Interstellar Overdrive is only 3 minutes and 9 seconds long. Is there two CD versions of this soundtrack, and are the track listing and the song lenghts listed in this article correct, do you know? --Deba Tihs ´n´ Mad Dog 14:59, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Immediate Label CD version
Talk:More (1969 film)

message: What is the allucinogenic concoction that was censored?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.170.54.46 (talk) 01:28, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no idea, but since it was a home-brew experiment, it may have no name.  It doesn't sound like a name for it was censored in the film, and nothing is censored in this article, if that's what you're asking about. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 06:54, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Concoction

message: "... and meets a free-spirited American girl, Estelle, following her to Ibiza"
- doesn't sound American to me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiujm (talk • contribs) 14:07, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  American? 
Talk:Knute Rockne, All American

message: What is the source for the title of this film using a comma (rather than some other option)? I note IMDb shows nothing between the name and "All American"; the VHS cover looks like it uses a dash... 75.187.145.70 (talk) 00:30, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I wondered the same thing.  The movie title card places the two phrases ("Knute Rockne" and "All American") on two separate lines.  The confusion arises when the phrases are placed on the same line.  Any other thoughts? JimVC3 (talk) 00:46, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comma, colon, dash, or nothing?
Talk:Return of the Secaucus 7

message: This is the only treatment of the film and is at least half negative, despite what the text says.  The stats show that 80% of reviewers liked it, and it got two awards, which contradicts the reviews.
"Baby boomers" doesn't describe the group; basically normal and unusually socially aware with resistance to red-neck authority would better describe them.  Discussion about the Big Chill and Thritysomething is completely irrelevant because independent films have an entirely different focus than corporate films that are apparently created by committee. --John Bessa (talk) 14:19, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Critical Reception
Talk:Love and Anarchy

message: For the record "Love and Anarchy" is also a title of a work written by the anarchist Ericco Malatesta, mentioned for example here on wikipedia   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.50.121.250 (talk) 21:26, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Now mentioned at Love and Anarchy (disambiguation). 2601:647:CB03:5930:E5A2:B546:9EC5:88A0 (talk) 04:42, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title