lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Phallotoxin

message: In all structures the Cystein shows the wrong stereochemistry. It has to be L-Cystein and not D-Cystein.
See:
https://doi.org/10.1002/jlac.198119811219  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2020.04.004
2001:638:1558:E094:C991:ACBB:EAC5:5753 (talk) 07:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong stereochemistry!
Talk:Arizona Geological Survey

message: Someone recently deleted this. I restored it, then looked at the blog. Top entry (12-28-07) is
 WikiProject Geology aims to improve Wikipedia coverage of geology. Heh. Serendipity... Pete Tillman (talk) 18:10, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: State Geologist's weblog
Talk:Juan Roa Sierra

message: Juan Roa Sierra was identified by his mother and possibly other close familiars by his deformed legs because his face was impossible to recocnize.
Article mentions name Gerat several times before explaining who the person is - this seems to be very confusing 83.223.156.4 (talk) 09:06, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chess in early literature

message: I have removed several texts in Chinese or Indian sections whose reference to Chess are mere speculation, often due to a poor translation of modern authors. 
The rest of the page is very poor too and would deserve a full re-writing. Many important texts are missing for Muslim, Indian, Persian, Chinese or Japanese sources. It has no sense presenting modern European countries as separate entries, especially when a text conserved in one country has been written in an other country. I recommend extreme caution. Sorry to be so harsh.Cazaux 14:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have restored these texts. The removal seems rather arbitrary. You removed, for example, the reference to Lifetime of Liu Xiang, which had three references, but kept Huan Kwai Lu (Book of Marvels), which has no references. Please give references for why the first is incorrect or unreliable. Instead of removing quotes, it would be better to mark them as speculation and give references explaining why they are speculation. I agree that this page need a lot of work, but lets not remove material without well founded reasons. HermanHiddema 09:57, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor or wrong information
Talk:Background music

message: In my opinion, Background Music can be background music, only in the condition that it is originally and intentionally
composed to be played-back as background in the mentioned places in the article like Elevators, etc...
The particular property that a Background Music must have, is that the structure of its melody and
themes may not necessarily observe the Aesthetics rules in Musical Form.  
Themes and melodies in Background music can be repeated limitlessly, because the audience
never pays attention to the structure of music; in other words the audience just hears (Not listens to) Background Music.
 
I think, a serious (artistic) music (eg. Classical music or even easy-listening music that observes the rules of Aesthetics
in Musical Form) cannot and must not be used as Background Music.
It is to be regretted that there are many Restaurent / Elevator / ... managers who select artistic and serious
styles of music to be used as Background Music. --217.219.76.163 21:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion 

message: This article could really do with covering music used in Television and Film too.  —Sladen (talk) 01:45, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ...and radio, audiobooks and podcasts.  Morganfitzp (talk) 22:01, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Television/film

message: Many retail outlets now have their own specially commissioned "radio station" which plays an appropriate genre of music interspersed with advertisements or promotional information. There is obviously some  overlap between background music and retail radio, but Wikipedia currently seems to be lacking a single article which groups these together. Perhaps a new article could usefully be created? Martinevans123 (talk) 16:41, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retail oulets 

message: I believe the line:
"When two concurrent sources of information compete must be processed, the sources interfere with each other."
should be edited. I am unsure if it should say:
"When two concurrent sources of information compete, and must be processed together, the sources interfere with each other."
or if the author's intended meaning is slightly different...
Tokyoeasywriter (talk) 08:41, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  1.1.2 Tasks music impairs
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Lord Hawk

message: User:Lord_Hawk
      run at Tue May 1 21:02:28 2007 GMT
Category:	1
Mainspace	1450
Portal:	1
Talk:	33
User talk:	33
User:	42
Wikipedia talk:	3
Wikipedia:	45
avg edits per page	1.57
earliest	02:53, 8 May 2006
number of unique pages	1025
total	1608
2006/5 	70 	
2006/6 	185 	
2006/7 	302 	
2006/8 	431 	
2006/9 	263 	
2006/10 	70 	
2006/11 	104 	
2006/12 	12 	
2007/1 	9 	
2007/2 	53 	
2007/3 	36 	
2007/4 	42 	
2007/5 	31 	
Lord Hawk's editcount summary stats as of 22:02, May 1st 2007, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 21:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Perry Clark

message: This article needs a disambiguation reference.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.5.4.73 (talk) 00:47, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:Knight of the Swan

message: I am not a medieval scholar, but this painting from the Palazzo Schifanoia in Ferrara seems to include the legend:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Aprile,_francesco_del_cossa,_11.jpg
The image is already on wiki - it's a lovely one, so perhaps it should be included?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.255.170.45 (talk) 20:53, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:33rd Chess Olympiad

message: The Chess City section could be improved by incorporating other references, such as contemporary reports from some of the well-known chess magazines. Quale 05:20, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Chess City]] 

message: What exactly is meant by the sentence "In addition to the overall medal winners, the teams were divided into seeding groups, with the top finishers in each group receiving special prizes." ? More details and explanation could improve the understandability of what is meant here. - Bob.v.R (talk) 11:02, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear
Talk:Ajeeb

message: Would be appropriate to incorporate this?:Hooper retired to England in 1895 but Ajeeb continued successfully, although an angry Westerner emptied his six-gun into its torso on one occasion, wounding the operator. (Hooper/Whyld, Oxford Companion, 1987, p. 4)Ihardlythinkso (talk) 09:59, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Funny! 
Talk:British Chess Championship

message: From Whyld:
*1912 - Richmond (Sy) - several Richmond's in the U.K. and my knowledge of U.K. geography is nil. I guessed that Sy is South Yorkshire but this is definitely a WAG.
From  chess.about.com:
*2000 - Street - there are several Street's in the U.K. so I linked to the disambig
Quale 08:04, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need help on a couple of locations 

message: Is it televised? 195.188.112.2 (talk) 03:56, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Televised

message: The article refers to a "Reeshul Shah" - searching the Internet turns up only copies of this page.  Anyone heard of him, or should the reference be deleted? Fletch79 (talk) 22:02, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an hoax. I removed it.Cbigorgne (talk) 11:08, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Reeshul Shah?

message: The Peggy Clarke (chess player) article links here as joint 1962 champion, but I cannot verify from the sources if this is the correct tournament. Can anyone help? Greenman (talk) 13:05, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  1962 

message: https://www.ft.com/content/6f0d3325-d21a-4ef2-839d-4eafe2293151
Thewriter006 (talk) 00:53, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harriet Hunt 22 years later new women's champion?
Talk:Bell Mobility

message: When editing the article we really should try to stay neutral and cite all sources.  RB
Bell Mobility is a division of BCE  Bell Canada Enterprise is the right name not bell canada. FCL
Actually, Bell Mobility is a subsidiary of Bell Canada, which is a subsidiary of BCE.--64.46.3.199 02:10, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Bell Mobility used to be Bell Cellular.  Did you know Bell Cellular had the world's first voicemail system for cellphones back in the decade of the 80's. See Voicemail which already mentions this.  Please create a history section.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.217.92.28 (talk) 19:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History Section Needed

message: This page reads as very biased against Bell Mobility.  Wikipedia is in tended as being a non-biased lexicon of information, yet this page reads as an anti-system access fee rant.  Where is talk of bell rich history or maybe some information on what this company offers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshuaawsome (talk • contribs) 07:23, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: bias
Talk:Lev Polugaevsky

message: For some reason I wasn't able to link the authors name (which is Polugaevsky) in the second book in the references section. I used a template, entering the authors name as "Polugayevsky, Lyev" because that's what it was transliterated as in the English addition. Under the "authorlink= " part I put "Lev Polugaevsky," which is the name of the article and the more often used transliteration. Except it didn't link it, and it also caused it to be bold for some reason. Could someone fix it or tell me how to fix it myself? Thanks!
GBizzle (talk) 18:44, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: It is a big mistake that you categorize Lev Polugaevsky as Belarusian chess player. After Soviet Union's collapse he has never been classified on FIDE rating lists as Belarusian, always as Russian player. It means nothing that he was born in Mahilyow. pjahr (talk) 18:20, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian chess player, not Belarusian
Talk:Rose Kerr (Girl Guiding)

message: Note that she might show up as Mrs. Mark Kerr if you are searching for info on her. --Erp (talk) 02:13, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  For those working on the article 

message: It seems there is a Rose Kerr who is a current English art historian specializing in Chinese art.   has added a line to the first paragraph of this article stating "She is not to be confused with Dr Rose Kerr, the English art historian specializing in Chinese art", I reverted, he reverted back.   My own view is no confusion is likely to arise given that Rose Kerr the Guide probably died before Rose Kerr the historian lived (and the dates are in the first sentence).  In fact confusion is likely to arise by people wondering who this other Rose Kerr is being mentioned right at the beginning of this article. Normally one would use a hatnote but the historian does not have a wikipedia page (though one might be created shortly though there is apparently a debate about notability).  Once the page is created then a hatnote can be added to this article (or even a disambiguation page if it is determined they are equally notable) but until then I don't think the historian should be mentioned in this article.  I think this is related to WP:NOARTICLE; if we don't have an article to redirect to we shouldn't mention that someone of the same name exists and isn't this person unless there is some direct connection (e.g., this Rose Kerr is grandmother of the historian).  After all should we also mention Rose Kerr who is director of education in Staten Island or Rose Kerr who is an expert on fish?   --Erp (talk) 05:36, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The art historian is a good deal more notable (these days) than the guider, and is likely to have a page soon. The note at least tells people she doesn't have a page yet. Why not stop trying to whip up a storm in a teacup? Johnbod (talk) 05:42, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Then use a redlinked hatnote even though those are frowned upon unless the article will show up in a day or two; it will save you having to come back to edit this page once the article is created.   The current situation will only leave people who come for the Guide leader confused.  Remember both are notable in only small areas.  --Erp (talk) 06:02, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with user:Erp, that's what hatnotes are for. If there is no article, write one or there is no issue. Not for lead paragraph.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 08:36, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rose Kerr disambiguation
Talk:Where in the World Is Matt Lauer?

message: The second location in Season 4 is given as "Britannia, North Sea".  What is this supposed to mean?  If it is supposed to be the UK (and this is what the links suggest), the word choice is strange, since all the others give "City Name, Country Name" - Britannia is not a city and North Sea is not a country.  If this is some other place, then the links given from these two words need to be changed to make that clearer. 123.223.30.149 (talk) 04:24, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The location was actually an oil platform named Britannia that was located in the North Sea.  I guess there isn't a correct link to the platform, so that basic one was used.  I haven't looked recently to see if a better link is available, so it's never been changed.  We could always use an external link instead.  --Mtjaws (talk) 19:39, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Britannia, North Sea?

message: When available, should the clues for the next destination be included with each city/location?  I'm not sure if the oldest ones could be found, but we could include the ones we do know.  --Mtjaws 21:28, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clues 

message: As more info is added, I think this page would look a lot better if it was displayed in table format.  The columns could be Season/Trip, Day (1-5), Date, Actual Location(s), Additional Locations, and Clues.  I'm sure we can all work on the formatting to make it look better.  One issue will be the long nature of the clues and their need to be word wrapped so their cell isn't too wide.  This page is only a week old so we have plenty of time to make it look great (and easier to read) for the next edition.  Thanks.  --Mtjaws 17:16, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transform into a Table 

message: I'm not exactly sure when, but NBC stopped using Rockapella's theme song a few years ago. I'm going to make a note of that. Ianthegecko (talk) 13:12, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rockapella 

message: Didn't Matt take a helicopter ride to do the second half of the show from Florence? MMetro (talk) 09:28, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pisa 

message: YAYY it's Back!!! Jena   (talk) 20:11, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2011
Talk:Hirschel Levin

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/9843-levin-hirschel-ben-aryeh-lob. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 00:27, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Telomer

message: This page says it's a disambiguation page, but links only to pages that are not titled "telomer". Should the disambiguation tag be removed, and this turned into a short article? For instance, the "degree of polymerization" statement/link only somewhat explains what a telomer is, and a general audience probably wouldn't understand that it is a polymer with chain length of 2-5 from the brief quasi-disambiguation description on this page.
Zolot 21:30, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:The Cocktail Party

message: AMaldo18 (talk) 19:47, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

message: Various productions are alluded to, but the information is missing (for instance the original London production).  I added a synopsis section.  With respect to Eliot's lecture criticizing his own work, what did he say about it?  I didn't think these two sentences should have their own heading.  If we add a critical reception section with information about what the critics said about the play, or some critical analysis of the play, then Eliot's own criticism can be moved down into that section.  From what I can see, the critics basically said that the play was overly long, flawed, but contained some great writing.  Best regards, -- Ssilvers 21:32, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Background/productions

message: Did he write this play while he was at the Institute for Advanced Study?Lestrade (talk) 01:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: IAS
Talk:Dunagiri

message: Note:  Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article  --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:25, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Unparliamentary language

message: Was it this phrase that owes its popularity to Matrix Churchill, as the article states?  What about "economical with the actualité" (Arms-to-Iraq)? -86.140.131.100 21:41, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Economical with the truth" 

message: The article talks about "the House" and "the Speaker".  Wouldn't it be more inclusive to refer to parliamentary chambers and presiding officers?  "The House" usually refers to the lower house of a bicameral legislature, whereas both chambers have rules about unparliamentary language.  --  JackofOz (talk) 00:36, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: General terminology

message: Or is there any penalty? 24.214.230.66 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 23:01, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question, as far as I understand it usualy being barred from the debate for the reminder of the day. Perhaps somebody should write a line or to, ought to be something about it in some of the sources the articles got by now. 90.142.144.88 (talk) 16:29, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the penalty for use of unparliamentary language? 
Talk:Lorne Campbell (ice hockey)

message: I'd like to move this to make way for a dab. There is an art historian I'd like to do a bio on. Any problem with that? Ta. Ceoil (talk) 00:20, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to move this in favour of a dab if no feedback in two weeks. Ceoil (talk) 13:35, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move for dab
Talk:MS-DOS Editor

message: Please do not post MS-DOS editor questions on this talk page or any other talk page.
Should we merge this with MS-DOS? SamBrown98121 (talk) 18:10, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It is good only when you need it. Otherwise, when it is done automatically, it will break some of your text files! It would have been good to offer the newline conversion as an option. I remember having lots of conversion problems because I used to transfer text files back and forth, betweem my UNIX account at the university and my home computer. The MS-DOS newline characters were considered as syntax errors by many compilers and interpreters in UNIX. 207.134.187.165 00:04, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

message: edit works for running editor in both cmd and run Atomic1fire (talk) 02:32, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: it really does ECat200 (talk) 16:42, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cmd/run

message: I think the article should have more info on the different variations, such as QBasic, QB, plain edit, and so on.   I'd forgotten about those!  I used them all. I think they all had a "binary editor" mode, right?  That info is disappearing. I came here looking for plain edit's file size. <BR> --2602:306:CFCE:1EE0:E807:88D1:D9B2:D8C8 (talk) 05:43, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  File Size & QBasic etc
Talk:Pitted Ware culture

message: "gradually /replacing/ the Funnelbeaker culture throughout the coastal areas of southern Scandinavia. It subsequently /co-existed/ ..." Logically not possible.2A02:8108:9640:AC3:7D1E:AB72:D10D:71BC (talk) 06:01, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradicting 

message: "gradually replacing the Funnelbeaker culture throughout the coastal areas of southern Scandinavia. It subsequently co-existed ..." - Logically not possible.2A02:8108:9640:AC3:7D1E:AB72:D10D:71BC (talk) 06:02, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: They did not completely replace them. Joostik (talk) 18:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradicting 

message: Many thanks for the informative genetics attributions. However, in wikipedia or any other encyclopedia, we do not need the journal name nor the month of publication in the main text! Rather, start with the lead author and year. Anything else belongs into the references. Thank You.HJHolm (talk) 08:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genetics 

message: I think it wouldn't hurt to add a bit about the context of the two samples, especially since the Genetics section is the usual unencyclopedic and unreadable hodgepodge of "Source A says this, Source B says that". Maybe you can paraphrase the part about "shar[ing] part of [...] phenotypic variation with SHGs" into Wikivoice. Austronesier (talk) 12:16, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: All good advice, thanks. I attempted this recently but am not the best writer so you'll probably see fit to clean it up. I did take the leap of specifying the skin pigmentation-related genes at which the SNPs were located, which may deviate too far in to WP:OR, as the inline only mentions the SNPs... Though it does read better than "rs16891982" and "rs1426654". - Hunan201p (talk) 17:14, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuity with Mesolithic HGs
Talk:Nøstvet and Lihult cultures

message: the dates of this, and its predecessor cultures, do NOT CONSISTENTLY use calibrated vs. uncalibrated dates.  Thus, it makes it very CONFUSING when trying to draw timelines.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.143.68.244 (talk) 23:01, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Menhir (Iron Age)

message: Menhirs continued to be raised in Scandinavia during the Pre-Roman Iron Age and later, over the graves of deceased.
:Isn't this a strange beginning? It seems as there is suppose to be some text before this about the use of menhirs before that time. /Jiiimbooh 14:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I see now that this is a continuation of a section in Menhir. Still a strange way to begin an article though, and I'm not sure there is a good reason to have the articles split?/Jiiimbooh 14:37, 13 September 2007 (UTC)