Talk:K9 (TV series)

message: Will the dash be in the title or not? The Independant uses the dash, as does the PR from Jetix Europe, but the Times doesn't and there is no dash on the new K9's body. GracieLizzie 11:14, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved the page, as the PR uses the dash, if it's later proved to be K9 and not K-9 then feel free to move it back.GracieLizzie 11:18, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you'd like, the dash is more like a dot and could be stylized as "K·9" to set the page apart. Thetardispig55 (talk) 18:45, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The character is "K9", but, how I read it, the show is "K·9". Thetardispig55 (talk) 18:46, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  K9 Adventures or K-9 Adventures? 

message: Although the first paragraph of the Times article refers to an "animated series", later in the article Bob Baker says that the programme will be "CGI animation mixed with live action".  But most of our references to this programme call it a "computer-animated series" or similar.  Should we change that?  (I'm about to go on wikibreak, so can't  right now.) —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 00:40, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animated? 

message: Is it just going to be on 'Jetix' (which i've never heard of) or is it going to be anywhere else? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wiggstar69 (talk • contribs) 14:32, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What channel will this air on? 

message: is the show canon in relation to Doctor Who?(Black Dalek 10:55, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Strictly speaking, there's no canon in Doctor Who, so you can decide for yourself whether it "counts". —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 07:22, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: canon

message: The show seems to have been simply renamed "K9" according to Outpost Gallifrey and another source I found on google. Andral 16:53, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  K9 is the new name 

message: I don't see anything in the article to justify the  tag?   As this is being produced in the Australia, funded by Australian money and broadcast first on an Australian station, shouldn't this be adjusted?--DeadlyAssassin (talk) 23:22, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It may be co-funded by an Australian network, but the series is being produced by Jetix Europe, headquartered in the UK.  — Edokter • Talk •  00:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

text: It is also being made by Park Entertainment, based in London. (see first sentence under "Production")  Etron81 (talk) 16:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  United Kingdom? 

message: Is this K-9 Mark V (or higher)? Being Mark IV introduces significant continuity issues. Is any 'version' indicated at all?--Jeffro77 (talk) 13:52, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not know of any "version" being mentioned at all in any promotional material or news items.  I would be rather surprised if the series mentioned it at all! (Etron81 (talk) 16:40, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

text: What it states in SJA has no bearing on this series, however.  This series is being produced completely independently of the BBC and will most likely have little, if any, references to Doctor Who or the other spinoffs. (Etron81 (talk) 17:12, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mark V?

message: I am writing an article about all of the series which are in the same shared reality as this one through spin-offs and crossovers. I could use a little help expanding the article since it is currently extremely dense and a bit jumbled with some sentence structures being extremely repetitive. I would like to be able to put this article into article space soon. Any and all help in writing the article would be appreciated, even a comment or two on the talk page would help. Please give it a read through, also please do not comment here since I do not have all of the series on my watch list. - LA @ 16:58, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking for help writing an article about the spin-offs and crossovers of this series 

message: At separate points the article states "a July 2008 debut is planned" and "Production is due to start in July 2008" but both can't be true CoW mAnX (talk) 21:20, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: I picked up Doctor Who Magazine #405 last week, and there's an article in it stating that K-9 will be returning to series three of The Sarah Jane Adventures.  He will be out of the black hole vault, and be appearing in at least half of the episodes of series three.  There is no mention made of the solo series in the article, one way or the other.  The fact that K-9 will be appearing on a regular basis aboard an already established childrens series would seem to indicate the solo program may not be happening after all.  Anyone have anything else on this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.66.146.49 (talk) 15:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought the same thing. However, the continuity of both shows seem to have no relationship with each other, so the decisions made by the BBC probably won't affect the cartoon... if there ever is one. Ray and jub (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 15:49, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The K9 series isn't a cartoon — it's live action with added CGI.  But you're right that there's no narrative connection between Sarah Jane Adventures and K9.  However, K9 is definitely going forward; about half of the first 26-episode series has been filmed in Australia, and Bob Baker is trying to sell the series to international broadcast networks at MIPTV.  It's still on schedule to air on Jetix/Disney XD in the UK and Network Ten in Australia in late 2009. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 15:59, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops. Maybe I should try reading the actual article first. Ray and jub (talk) 16:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still Going Forward? 

message: The Doctor Who News Page is reporting that the latest DWM has news that John Leeson will be voicing K-9 throughout this series and that transmission will be in Sring 2010 in Australia - does anyone have a copy of this issue to cite properly? Etron81 (talk) 23:00, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latest DWM - NEWS! 

message: I've removed the following from the article: "According to a report in Broadcast magazine, the BBC opted out of involvement in order to focus on their own Doctor Who spin-off, Torchwood."  Broadcast doesn't make their archives available to the public on the web; I'm guessing that this was the article originally referenced, but it's available only to subscribers.  If anyone has access to the original article, either on the web or in a library, and can verify that this claim was in the article and provide a full citation, we can restore it.  But frankly it seems to me like someone got their wires crossed.  I found this summary of the Broadcast article in the archives of the Doctor Who News Page, and it doesn't mention Torchwood; instead, it mentions that the BBC "is already committed to a number of spin-off projects".  This was before any of the plans for The Sarah Jane Adventures had been announced, so I suspect that the editor who first added this back in 2006 thought the BBC rep was talking about Torchwood, when in fact he was thinking about SJA but couldn't mention it.  After all, Torchwood and K-9 are aimed at very different audiences, but there's a lot more overlap between the intended audience of K-9 and Sarah Jane. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 19:47, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Broadcast" magazine bit 

message: I made an edit of Remi Broadway appearing as Robin Hood in episode 4 changing it to episode 14 as that is how the episode in question The Last Oak Tree is now placed. The episode 4 description was based on what it says on Broadway's website and obviously they have not taken into account the change of episode order for The Last Oak Tree.--The Shadow Treasurer (talk) 20:20, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remi Broadway in Episode 14 

message: Ip(s) have been adding various dates to this column in the episodes section - is there any way to verify them?  They are very cofusing currently with one episode having two dates and one episode apparently being skipped - are some regions airing out of order?
Can someone with access to the various TV schedules verify these dates? Etron81 (talk) 18:08, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there should be only 1 date in the "Worldwide Premiere" column - I have done this a few times and someone's addedd addtional ones back.  My opnion is that the Worldwide premiere shoudl list the date of the first broadcast anywhere in the world, with the country/broadcaster noted.  I also think that a UK date column and an Australian date column would be good as well, as they are the countries of origin. Etron81 (talk) 17:38, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  World wide broadcast premiere dates 

message: UK TV GUide is listing that K-9 will be starting in the UK on April 3, but does not list any episode titles - is there any listings on the UK Disney XD site?  (I cannot check myself as they geoblock that site for us outside the UK) Etron81 (talk) 20:22, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK showtime 

message: Shouldn't articles be created for the other main characters as well as a 'list of K-9 minor characters' page, like it's done for Torchwood and The Sarah Jane Adventures? 109.158.138.99 (talk) 15:53, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters 

message: The R2 complete box set supposedly released as an exclusive via the "Who Shop" appears to be mythical.  The footnote/reference number 29 does not link to details of such a release.  There is no evidence it ever existed.  The R2 releases are two box sets, with no exclusives.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.111.13.78 (talk) 09:12, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD Releases 

message: K9 seems to be the preferred spelling.
I have already compiled a list of sources for this on the K9 talk page.
Of particular note are:
* The official K9 webiste
* The official K9 facebook page
--Liam McM (Talk|Contribs) 23:56, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested move to "K9 (TV series)" 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  feminist (talk) 02:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: K-9 (TV series) →  – Correcting title to match K9 (Doctor Who). For over four decades, the character has been consistently named K9 in official sources. Secondary sources are mixed – especially if parent show Doctor Who is involved – but within this series itself, there is no use of "K-9" whatsoever, as John Leeson is credited as "Voice of K9". O.N.R. (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 November 2021