lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gartner hype cycle

message: The Hype_Cycle exists so that the many corporations benefiting from technology churn can make money.
 - The paid research organizations selling far future technology strategy consulting to companies
 - The paid research organizations selling strategic planning for future technology to implement in the next year 
 - The technology media selling print/online content review/howto/what it is and advertisements hosted therin
 - The consulting firms selling training, certification for the technology
 - The book authors for the technology
 - The consulting firms selling product implementation
 - The vendors selling training, tools, software libraries for the technology
 - The vendors having new product to sell and retiring/end-of-life existing products
 - The bloggers/independent consultants promoting their consulting services and selling advertising on blogs for that technology
It's a 7 year cycle designed to churn old technology out and get spending on new technology without regard to if the new technology will be viable in production for 10 years.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.197.56.204 (talk • contribs) 18:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article misses the important point 

message: Why is Wikipedia using such a phrase, without explaining what it means? What exactly is 'branded'? And how? 
Articles are supposed to tell readers stuff. Not throw phrases at them and leave them guessing... AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:54, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the heck is a 'branded graphical presentation'? 

message: It's branded because it's always used as Gartner Hype Cycle, and as such I support the name change. I think a Hype Cycle article could be merited when supported by research, but that is not this. --LaPingvino (talk) 14:40, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Suggested Move to Gartner Hype Cycle and question about branded graphical presentation
Talk:Ten Thousand Islands

message: Not sure whether Keewaydin Island or Marco Island, Florida are considered part of this waterway (A quick glance at Google Earth would indicate they may be) but would suggest we start a section in this article called "Named Islands along the Waterway" or some such.  As it stands there are no linkages from this article to other Wikipedia articles on Islands within this chain.  I will start the section but leave it blank for the moment.  Theflyer 17:39, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Named Islands

message: The large map of the entire U.S. is practically useless...people know where Florida is. And map of Florida should be enlarged so that the reader doesn't see a highlighted coastline but actual islands. Is there a map readily available that could be substituted so that readers can see the relationship between the islands and the mainland (and also see how numerous the islands really are)? This would be welcome. 69.125.134.86 (talk) 19:39, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  A better photo?
Talk:Daniel Ling

message: Dr Ling as he had a PhD —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scrumpo (talk • contribs) 
:Actually it's a Wikipedia consensus/guideline that PhDs do not have "Dr" in their subject lines. See: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies)#Academic titles. Whitejay251 19:56, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Weeden Island culture

message: I'll just note that "Weedon Island Culture" gets 33 google hits while "Weeden Island Culture" gets about 1,880 google hits. AdamWeeden really should have raised this move for discussion back here before making the move. Unless someone can convince me that the archaeological community prefers "Weedon Island Culture" over "Weeden Island Culture", I will move this back. -- Donald Albury 13:19, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As I stated on the note you left on my talk page I thought that Weed(e/o)n Island culture is derivative off Weedon Island (which IS spelled that way).  If I am incorrect  I apologize. Adam Weeden 15:01, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What counts is what it is called in the archaeological literature. If the name of the island is spelled differently, that should be noted in the article. I notice that all of the sites that use "Weedon Island culture" are Florida related. The spelling "Weeden Island culture" appears to be used universally in the archaeological literature. As the term was established by archaeologists, I would say that "Weedon Island culture" is the incorrect spelling. This has nothing to do with the accepted spelling of the geographical feature. The fact that 'Weeden' has been the spelling used by archaeologists since the 1920s is stated here. While that spelling was a mistake, it is firmly entrenched in the scientific literature. As I said above, it is worth noting in the article but does not justify changing all the references to the archaeological construct. However, as I cannot move the article back without using an admin tool, which I won't do because I'm nvolved in this I askk for an uninvolved admin to look at and do wheteever is appropriate. -- Donald Albury 15:52, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Understood and agreed.  I sincerely apologize for my hastiness in the move.  It's my fault for thinking that this world actually makes sense. ;) Adam Weeden 16:05, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I believe I have at least fixed this page.  Can someone confirm?  I will fix all the other "weeden island culture" changes I made in other wp articles, though I will let my weedon island changes stay for reference to the actual place. Adam Weeden 16:10, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I think I have now put back all my other changes.  Sorry for the trouble. Adam Weeden 16:15, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As I said on your talk page, I can see why you did it. I changed a couple of instances of 'Weedon' to 'Weeden' and added some more references. I think we're fine. -- Donald Albury 23:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Weeden vs. Weedon
Talk:GameCube online functionality

message: Yes?  No?  Should be mentioned in the article. --Josh1billion 01:32, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How could it work with the Wii? It plugs into a hole in the bottom of the GCN. 70.29.212.131 (talk) 09:22, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does this work on the Wii? 

message: I remember there being a game called "Lost ..... 2", I don't remember what the second word was, but I remember it being advertised as having an online mode. 24.7.141.45 (talk) 17:36, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost something.... 

message: Citation #4 is about XBox servers, not GameCube servers.  66.76.9.163 (talk) 05:07, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invalid citation 
Category talk:Vegetarian cuisine

message: What's typically vegetarian about Halva or Guacamole? Do they substitute anything non-vegetarian?
If they can be in this category, can I add other foods that don't contain animal body parts? Wikipeditor 22:52, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone added "Breakfast cereal" so I dont see why not. 205.161.214.82 02:57, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Typical for a vegetarian diet” 

message: I'm not entirely clear on what articles belong in this category.  It seems to me like it should not be a dumping ground for articles about every food or dish that is not meat-based -- there are too many of them and we have better categorization schemes for them.  Moreover I think as a general principle articles should be categorized by defining characteristics of the topic, rather than by things the topic is not.  So, what belongs here, either directly or in subcategories?
* Articles about ethnic cuisines that are traditionally vegetarian -- OK?
* Meat substitutes -- OK?
* Restaurants that specialize in vegetarian cuisine -- OK?
* Publications and media about vegetarian cuisine -- OK?
* Foods that are associated with traditional ethnic vegetarian cuisines, like tofu or dal -- maybe?
* Foods that just happen not to be meat-based without any strong connection to the practice of vegetarianism, like macaroni and cheese or breakfast cereals -- maybe not?
* Anything else?
What do others think?  I don't have any particularly strong opinions about vegetarianism but don't like to see the category getting cluttered with random articles that have only a peripheral connection to the topic.  Dr.frog (talk) 05:40, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What belongs in this category?
Talk:St. Marks Light

message: Is this photo of the 1840 Lighthouse worth loading into the Commons and linking here? ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 00:17, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That tower is visibly different from the photo currently in the infobox. The tower was dismantled and moved in 1842 and then rebuilt after extensive damage from the Civil War. I doubt that is a photo from 1842 or earlier. Does "1840" perhaps mean the tower as it was rebuilt in 1842, which existed until c. 1865? That is more plausible for a photograph. Certainly you should upload it to Commons. I think it should be worked in as showing how the tower changed when it was rebuilt. -- Donald Albury 12:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll load it tonight probably and link it in. Yes, I'm simply propagating the "1840" part forward with some doubt about that myself. Picture quality does seem to reflect pre-Civil War but not by 10 years. earliest photos in the 1850s, I believe. To me, this photo looks like it has been hand-altered, the outline of the tower looks penciled(?) in. Should the "1840 " not be mentioned in the caption? ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 13:06, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Pre-Civil War", maybe? I would have questioned whether it was a photo, but the vegetation in the foreground looks natural. -- Donald Albury 18:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Second Light
Talk:Matanzas Inlet

message: No references; filled with unsupported value judgements and historical assumptions. For example, the article calls Florida "Spanish soil" although the Spanish had no settlements at the time. It makes unsupported claims of "piracy" by the French Protestants, without considering the geopolitical situation. 82.224.103.123 (talk) 17:00, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Better? -- Donald Albury 17:51, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Talk:St. Joseph Peninsula

message: The map of the St. Joseph Peninsula was removed from the article with the claim that it was inaccurate because the peninsula also includes Cape San Blas. The USGS Coastal Classification Atlas divides the barrier spit into four sections: Cape San Blas, closest to the mainland; St. Joseph Peninsula, the southern third of the spit extending north from Cape San Blas; and St. Joseph Point SE and NE, extending further north from the St. Joseph Peninsula. If anyone is aware of a map from a reliable source that explicitely includes Cape San Blas in St. Joseph Peninsula (not just in the state park, which does not necessarily conform to geographical definitions), please link to it. Donald Albury 15:27, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:St. Joseph, Florida

message: Opposed. Since the area was unoccuppied for 60 or 70 years between the storm of 1843 and the founding of Port St. Joe (on a different site) in the early 20th century, this article is not part of the history of Port St. Joe. -- Donald Albury(Talk) 16:00, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Support Dal - no sense merging two separate towns histories. KillerChihuahua?!? 19:18, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Oppose merge  Really two separate towns.  --JW1805 (Talk) 16:13, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: I'm considering proposing that this article be renamed (moved to) St. Joseph, Florida, with the existing St. Joseph, Florida being renamed (moved to) St. Joseph, Florida (disambiguation). Historically, the subject of this article has been the most prominent place named St. Joseph in Florida. Moreover, the current title of the page is an anachronism. While the site of the former town of St. Joseph is currently in Gulf County, the town was in Franklin County when it was settled, and soon after that, Calhoun County was created to give the town its own county. St. Joseph was the county seat of Calhoun County until the town was abandoned. Calhoun County was later expanded northward, and then the southern part of Calhoun County (more or less coterminous with the original boundaries of the county) was separated as Gulf County. Donald Albury 18:25, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 15:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2 July 2023
Talk:St. Augustine Light

message: In the lead, what does " private-aid" mean?  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 04:12, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed it per source, which says, "Station established 1823. Active (privately maintained)". Thanks for pointing this out. Carlstak (talk) 04:37, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I didn't know what that phrase meant. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 05:06, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:   private-aid
Talk:Sanibel Island Light

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
coordinates do not go to the lighthouse location, they go to somewhere close but quite a distance away
—98.201.163.183 (talk) 13:48, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
The actuals coordinates are  26°27'10.62"N  82° 0'51.41"W
—98.201.163.183 (talk) 13:49, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: . Deor (talk) 22:55, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 
Talk:Bhattiprolu

message: I have wikified this page, and tried to link it to relevant articles.  Mattisse 22:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: linkless

message: The words "chinna lanja dibba" have profane meaning and looks like spam. The citation given there does not give those names. It might be the case that that is real name, but can we atleast remove the citation? Mlpkr 12:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Buddist Stupa location

message: It is not spam. 'Lanja' in Telugu language means Prostitute. When Buddism fell out of favour (around 6th century AD) the people ascribed such names to Buddhist monasteries and stupas. The usage of the names continues till today.
:In response to your question on my talk page, I was wikifying articles in the backlogged "To Do List" section last August. Bhattiprolu was there. I tried to wikify this article to help out and spent a considerable amount of energy trying to find reference citations and help the article out. The words you refer to were already there:  and were not put there by me. I have no idea what they mean. I was trying to do my best.  Sorry if I did something wrong. I have now learned not to try to improve India articles. I removed the citations  I added to the page that you are objecting to. Sorry to have upset you. Sincerely, --Mattisse 13:28, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, please try to improve. These are exceptional cases. Mlpkr 17:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification

message: See Talk:Telugu language#early epigraphy. Also, according to Bhattiprolu alphabet, that alphabet is a variant of Brahmi, not a progenitor. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 13:00, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bhattiprolu script 
Talk:Pensacola Light

message: The caption in the info box says, "The second Pensacola Lighthouse, date unknown" and is wrong. While the exact date is unknown, it can at least be narrowed down. The black paint was added in the "mid-1870s" according to The Pensacola Lighthouse by Thomas M. Garner, pg 11. There is also a known photo, published in the same book, which is in possession of the Pensacola Historical Society. The surrounding trees and brush are decidedly much smaller in the society photo, which was taken "in the late 19th century." The named book cover photo was taken in the early 20th century and looks remarkably similar to the info box photo, though still the brush is thinner. This lends credence that it appears the info box photo was likely taken in the early 20th century and possibly even up to the mid-20th century. MagnoliaSouth (talk) 02:51, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The photo date 
Talk:Game Boy Advance Wireless Adapter

message: These items are the same thing, with the same software loaded in them and they serve the same purpose...  In fact, the articles are pretty much the same - any objections?
:Someone had created the link in the GBM hardware template so I created the page by essentially copying the stuff from the GBA one. My bad. Go ahead and do it, but take the GBM wireless adapter link out of the template, or ask me if you don't know how (it's rather confusing). --Thaddius 14:53, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I merged them.  The Micro adaptar could be explained in one sentence for this article. Hbdragon88 02:41, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Discussion 

message: That project lists, Wireless game adapter as a missing article. It seems slightly absurd that we have this article on a specific one while we don't have the general article. Anyone up for rectifying that? :) - Taxman Talk 14:30, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess it would include all wireless adaptors that enable wireless internet on consoles, as well as internet and multiplayer access for handhelds. I'll see what I can do. --Thaddius (talk) 16:50, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a start, but I expect it will be nominated for deletion rather quickly. --Thaddius (talk) 18:01, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles]] 

message: I probably should have signed in first, but I added a third party link cable alternative and the necessary citations.
70.161.106.149 (talk) 21:25, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Party Link Cable Addition 
Talk:NES Satellite

message: I remember blocking the signal while playing The Legend of Zelda while Link was moving. With the signal blocked, he kept moving. This seems to me that it works by not sending a constant button is down signal, but a button down, button up signals. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 12:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  line of sight 

message: I suggest that the list of NES games that are compatible with this device be split to List of NES Satellite and NES Four Score compatible games, as the compatibility list duplicates content on the other article. 76.66.198.128 (talk) 11:42, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: The NES Satellite and NES Four Score should be the same article the differing only with the added wireless feature for the Satellite. The NES console, the games, and the plugged controllers are completely agnostic as too the difference between these two adapters.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.111.65.206 (talk) 03:47, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  vote to merge 

message: I've confirmed that Rock 'n Ball shares two controllers for 4 players when used with Nestopia in Retroarch. It also isn't in Compatible Games of https://wiki.nesdev.com/w/index.php/Four_Score#Compatible_games. Can somebody confirm that the NES Satellite doesn't allow 4 separate controllers to be used so that this entry can be removed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by VideogameScrapbook (talk • contribs) 18:04, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rock 'n Ball
Talk:Word Up! (album)

message: I know Willis may not meet the standard Wikipedia definition of a notable musician, but her cover was featured in a memorable scene of CSI, and I believe that constitutes notability. I found numerous web pages on which people demanded to know who did that version of the song; Wikipedia should be there to answer the question. 63.215.29.15 22:58, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Nintendo Power (cartridge)

message: Can anybody find a (free or fair use) image of the Nintendo Power peripheral? Jeff Silvers 02:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image? 

message: I didn't see this answered in the article. For American readers, "Nintendo Power" is likely to bring to mind the Nintendo-owned magazine by that name. Does this product have any relation to that, or is it just coincidental?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjkucia (talk • contribs) 18:09, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the name related to the magazine at all?
Talk:Multitap

message: I remember reading that Super Smash Bros Melee had support for 6 players.
Or perhaps the Gamecube supposed to have 6 ports (interesting to note that a cube has 6 sides).
--Raifox 08:21, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gamecube multitap 

message: The article is merely one section (excluding the "see also" section) with no citations. ♦TH1RT3EN™ talk ♦ contribs 17:18, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikify 
Talk:London River Services

message: The article contained the following statement:
:The River Thames is generally no more than 30m wide as it runs through central London, ...
Now I know the Thames isn't a hugely wide river, and I don't disagree with the general sentiment of the sentence containing this statement, which is making the point that the river is easily bridgeable. But 30 metres is only the length of three London buses parked nose to tail, and I'm sure you could park many more than that across (say) London Bridge. Also Thames Clippers latest boats are 38 metres long (http://www.thamesclippers.com/fleet/view/193) and would have serious problems turning in a river only 30 metres wide.
I'm therefore going to remove the 30m claim. If you can see a flaw in my reasoning, and can cite a decent reference, please feel free to reinstate. -- Chris j wood (talk) 00:30, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact, using Google maps I now suspect that this was a typo. Throughout central London, the river width seems to vary from around 250m to just under 300m, suggesting that 300m was the intended 'generally no more than' width. I shall reinstate, with amendment. -- Chris j wood (talk) 00:41, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  30 metres? 

message: Shouldn't you mention the lines (I mean RB1, RB2 etc)? They are so frequently mentioned when talking about river buses that I suggest they also be mentioned in Wikipedia. The sources are the official TFL website and the official ThamesClippers website: here (TFL), here (TFL) and here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.149.215.120 (talk) 17:59, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lines
Talk:Controller Pak

message: How much data is 7 pages on the Controller Pak (in bytes)?--67.10.200.101 01:46, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How much data is 7 pages on the Controller Pak? 

message: The controller pak management screen in Mario Kart and snowboards kids list the memory card as only being able to save 16 notes (Files) using any amount of the 123 pages, even if all games use only 1 page. Atirage 08:11, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes and limitation 

message: This article should name all the games that have management screens. I helped by adding Tony Hawk's Pro Skater.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.218.12.31 (talk • contribs) 20:41, 1 March 2008
:Please sign your posts with four tildes (~). I think the Turok games since Turok 2 all had data management screens. When I compiled the list of rumble pak supported games I went to a place where they had pictures of all the covers. For what you're asking you'd need to have access to all the manuals and spend the time looking through them. I don't think anyone is really going to put time into that task anytime soon. --Thaddius (talk) 18:24, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Management Screens