lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rick Swenson

message: This is an article about Rick Swenson, not about the Iditarod. The extensive listing of controversy etc. should not be on this page. Hence, I'm going to delete the items that don't pertain to Swenson. Deirdre 22:51, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is the work of a User:SledDogAC, whom is currently under an indefinate block for posting the same text multiple times to the Iditarod article after she had been told not to.  She is evading that block by being an IP Anon. and continues to make the same edits.  In fact, I noticed that she had edited multiple articles related to mushing today.--Coaster1983 03:07, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspected something like this, having seen the Iditarod history...Deirdre 01:27, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iditarod controversy inappropriate here 

message: Should an "Expand" and "Clean-Up" tag be placed, some of this page could use a bit of revision and clean up, and possibly some expanding.Frozen4322 (talk) 15:45, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand and Clean-up 
Talk:Peadar Andrews

message: How come the infobox wont sit on the right of the page? Frainc 00:08 06 September 2006
: Because your not using it right see Ray Cosgrove for the correct usage (Gnevin 23:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Update ,i've got this page updated too you can also look at it (Gnevin 00:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:River shark

message: — Assignment last updated by LL03251944 (talk) 14:34, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Composition II

message: The article has this ambiguous sentence: This genus was thought to contain five different species, but recent studies on molecular data revealed that the species Glyphis gangeticus has an irregular distribution in the Indo-West Pacific region. It's worded to suggest that the number of species may be wrong, do to the "irregular distribution" of one species, but it's not clear if that means there are more species or fewer species. Could somebody clear this up? —MiguelMunoz (talk) 22:58, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Species Count
Talk:Rough longnose dogfish

message: The picture shown was incorrect, showed a species of Squalus.  I tried to change it, but am not familiar with editing Wikipedia pages.  A good image can be found here:  https://fishbase.mnhn.fr/images/species/Dehys_m0.jpg 2603:7082:1D40:8:A4AF:5D06:57D6:609F (talk) 18:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Emma Lee French

message: what are some commom foods?
what are you famous for in history?
what are some inventions during your lifetime?
what type of music/musical instruments/musican were popular?
what type of clothes did you wear?
was there electricity during your day? If so what was it used for? If not, what did you do to make up for not having it?
How did you get water into your home?
what was your health like?
what was your the medicine like during your day? 
what were the commom illness during yuor day?
what was your mode (type) of transportation?
what wuold your epitaph read? (your tombstone) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.121.109.80 (talk) 22:25, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope you don't expect Emma Lee French to answer these herself. A glance at the top of her article (click on the "view article" link) reveals that she died in 1897 — 110 years ago.  — AnnaKucsma   (Talk to me!) 19:40, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  here are some questions I need Emma  Lee to answer....
Talk:Roughskin dogfish

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 21:19, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:School shark

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 20:09, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:Scoophead

message: Don't see how 90cm adult males and 120-133cm adult females average to 150cm long sharks...
--TLein (talk) 10:01, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Checked the source a bit, 150cm seems to be max length, and average being 90cm for males. Females wasn't mentioned in the source? TLein (talk) 13:04, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size?
Talk:Scyliorhinus

message: I'm afraid I don't like the table in this article - can we go back to the simple list please? GrahamBould (talk) 04:13, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there a reason you dislike the table? Abyssal (talk) 04:57, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Species table
Talk:Mr. Greedy

message: A cleanup tag was placed on this article a few weeks back, and some minor improvement was made, yet no discussion ever took place here as to what sort of work needed to be done.  I find this puzzling.  Frankly, I see no reason for all of these very short, separate articles on the characters from this book series.  All of it can be dealt with in the main article.  That said, I have tagged this article for wikification and categorization, but I believe it should be merged into the main article. ---Charles 17:42, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: You know, this article is really short.  It is part of a larger amount of material.   There are other articles about characters in works of fiction, but a lot of them ar posted together in a single List article.  Maybe this character and all of the other Mr./Little Miss character stubs couls/should be merged into such a single article.   I really see little reason for them to be listed all seperatly.  The amount of information provided is minimal.  -- Jason Palpatine 13:50, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Short
Talk:Shark cartilage

message: I have seen the mention of a disease or condition called "puritanis ani" in literature about the purported benefits of shark cartilage use.
It seems to be an often-repeated typo (probably done in a document which was recopied by most suppliers and resellers of shark cartilage).
Any idea as to what it might be?
CielProfond (talk) 20:12, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Puritanis ani 

message: By focusing on cancer, the article is entirely missing: the point. Of course it won't work for cancer. But will it work for something less controversial, like joint support, bone health, immune health, and more? --IO Device (talk) 20:59, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: According to WP:BOLD, jump right in and add any studies that you've found on the topic!--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 18:14, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing the point 
Talk:Shark cage diving

message: I propose merging Shark proof cage and Shark baiting and renaming as Shark cage diving.
Both articles are small and both are components of the shark cage diving activity, so consolidating them is logical. · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 09:33, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge done, move next. · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 18:26, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Move also done. · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 18:29, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: The newly added section "Shark Tourism and Cage Diving" does not have a neutral point of view and features phrases such as "I personally believe." I'm new here, so... should this be edited or maybe deleted altogether? Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.252.150.145 (talk) 04:04, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New biased section added
Talk:Sherwood dogfish

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 06:09, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Sicklefin lemon shark

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 06:47, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: "Significant levels of genetic differentiation between sicklefin lemon sharks in Australia and French Polynesia, 750 km (470 mi) apart, suggest that there is little intermingling between regional subpopulations.[4]"
This statement is nonsense.     Do they mean,  7500 kilometres (4700 miles) between Australia and Tahiti perhaps ?Eregli bob (talk) 21:25, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Added URL to reference which was used to support this statement. Original statement (in abstract of paper) is "...populations in Australia and French Polynesia, separated by oceanic distances of at least 750 km, are moderately differentiated...". I agree paraphrased statement should be improved but haven't done so myself. -IGTaylor (talk) 22:22, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  More nonsense statements 
Talk:Silvertip shark

message: This edit: it has been assessed as of Least Concern, at the end of the section "Human interactions" does not read well. That's why I changed it to it has been assessed as "Least Concern". Axl ¤ [Talk] 18:56, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, feel free to change it back then. But could you also put quotes around any other IUCN statuses in the prose (not the infobox), to maintain consistency? -- Yzx (talk) 17:45, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Okay, thanks. [Although there aren't any other IUCN statuses in the prose.] Axl ¤ [Talk] 07:07, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human interactions 

message: The distribution map indicates presence in the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean, but the article states their presence there is unconfirmed. Shouldn't the map be changed to corroborate the text of the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.162.12.96 (talk) 03:19, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution 

message: Hi from Czech. I just translated this article to czech, but... I think in article is wrong map, because in article you said: "Its presence in the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea is unconfirmed". Krvesaj (talk) 22:07, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong map?
Talk:Slender smooth-hound

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 08:17, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Sliteye shark

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 08:00, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Smalleye hammerhead

message: This is a wrong sentence: ″This species has also been known to consume swimming crabs, squid, grunts, and newborn scalloped hammerheads.″
Because the smalleye hammerhead and the scalloped hammerhead doesn't live in the same ocean. It should be corrected. DenesFeri (talk) 09:20, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong sentence
Talk:Smalltail shark

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 08:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Smalltooth sand tiger

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 08:36, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Smooth-hound

message: This species is often quoted as being the shark in which Aristotle discovered ovovivparity. It's found in the seas round Lesbos. Quite possibly it has been renamed sometime in the last century: at any rate it seems unlikely that any small shark in European waters would go unnoticed by taxonomists. My interest is simply to get accurate info into history of biology pages. Can anyone help? Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:17, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to FishBase, Mustelus leavis Linck, 1790 is a junior synonym of Mustelus mustelus (Linnaeus, 1758) . Gdr 18:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mustelus laevis  
Talk:Spadenose shark

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 19:29, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed