Talk:Bhrigu Samhita

message: Can someone please provide evidence reference that it was compiled by Shishyas otherwise I will be modifying the content?Zombie1979 (talk) 12:00, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: can i get the address of bhrigu samith center to lean smthing about myself present and past  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.94.183.108 (talk) 04:05, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  heloo 

message: Substituted at 09:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bhrigu Samhita. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527233101/http://www.starsnu.org:80/bhrigu-samhita.aspx to http://www.starsnu.org/bhrigu-samhita.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:28, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hi all, I'm sure you have noticed that this article lacks any actual references and relies on the mythological claims made in the "Bhrigu Samhita" itself. It reads like a mythological account of the Bhrigu Samhita rather than an actual historical one. For example, in the starting paragraph, it says "The Bhrigu Saṃhitā is a thousands of years ((No references)) old Sanskrit astrological (Jyotish) classic attributed in its introduction to Maharishi Bhrigu during the Vedic period, the Treta yuga ((Mythological age))". . It then goes on to an explanation of why the mythical Maharshi Bhrigu wrote this treatise, again completely ignoring the actual history behind it. This whole paragraph should be replaced by an account of the actual origin and purpose of the text rather than a mythological theory of its origin. I have marked the article as needing a complete rewrite. Please let me know if there is any opposition to this. (gnanvit (talk) 13:12, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It antedates recorded history so you will find no historical record. But if you consult it you can find out who you were thousands of years ago. And what you will be in your next life. Remember that in the cosmic order you are more insignificant than an ant, yet you think you know everything.24.139.24.163 (talk) 23:48, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think the editor claimed to know everything in any way. They were advocating skepticism, which is the opposite. (I am an admirer of Advaita, by the way—I mean no disrespect to Hinduism's rich philosophical tradition.) Anyway, my search doesn't turn up any reliable sources on the book, just one article that appears to be in a fringe academic journal. I am going to add a template indicating this article may not meet WP notability guidelines. I won't list it for deletion now, though, to give people time to provide sources if they have some. Gazelle55 (talk) 01:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs a complete rewrite