lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Peter Beale

message: shouldn't this be changed to...deceased —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.31.33.21 (talk • contribs) 
No, we don't know if he dies so we can't say that yet.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.108.165.42 (talk • contribs) 
:It is unconfirmed whether he died or not, but I doubt it. Leave it as it is for now. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 20:29, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He's not going to die. Write-ups for next week's episodes include "Ian hugs Phil for saving Peter's life". — AnemoneProjectors (zomg!) 20:03, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deceased

message: They began dating in November 2007 not december 2007.--78.146.174.20 (talk) 18:33, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Peter and Lauren's Relationship

message: according to this article, Kathy Mitchell and Bev williams are peters grandfathers?
Surely this is wrong.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.39.116.172 (talk) 15:51, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this right?

message: Pure speculation of course but we know that his leaving scenes were "recently" filmed, and Jo Joyner said today that EastEnders are currently filming for February 2011, so to me it seems more likely Peter will go in 2011. AnemoneProjectors 21:11, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't you mean Feb 2011?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.14.237 (talk) 21:02, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well unless EastEnders now film a few months behind, yes he does, it's just a typo :) --5 albert square (talk) 21:12, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

text: Yes, not used to typing "2011". AnemoneProjectors 21:16, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaving 

message: Why is it i looked up how uncle ben was related to peter and this pops up yo this is funny tho 🤣 50.86.55.103 (talk) 21:56, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spiderman
Talk:List of Care Bear characters

message: I don't really care that much about Care Bears (no pun intended), but I think that the "Care Bear Allies" section is just a bit excessive. There's nothing super-wrong with it, and I trust it was made in good faith, but I think that most people don't care to know, and it just bogs down the article. If you agree/disagree, post your opinions here.
Also, I noticed some vandalism on the page, but I couldn't find the correct revision in the History section, so I tried to remove it manually...but there's still some left (see how someone messed up the Me Bear, Messy Bear, and Too Loud Bear). If someone could find the right revision and undo it, that would be nice. --StoryMakerEchidna (talk) 21:47, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much information 

message: I keep trying to sort this mess of Allies out and someone keeps reverting my edits. Can we have a discussion on the talk page please? The information about each child and the one episode they appear in is not necessary on this page and as I stated above and in my edit summarys is more appropriate for a list of episodeas rather than a character list.CareBearCleanUp (talk) 17:27, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Allies
Talk:Single foot grinds

message: I think it's best to use just this single page for the Single foot grinds, because otherwise there will just be stub articles everywhere for each grind.
--Churchill 19:18, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of single page for Grinds

message: If you think that a grind definition may be wrong in this article, discuss it here first, as many people give different names to different grinds. The names listed here are the most widely regarded correct names of the well known single foot grinds.
--Churchill 15:20, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Grind definitions
Talk:Andrew Lanza

message: I just added the fact that Mr. Lanza is currently running for the Republican nomination for a State Senate seat.
--LeRoi 19:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Unsourced material, especially the kind that subjectively promotes the point of view of the article, is not allowed.174.73.5.74 (talk) 11:46, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material 

message: 18:13, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes
Talk:List of puppets in Naruto

message: I dont believe Kankuro's puppets have been destroyed compleatly. Yes, they recieved alot of damage and last seen in pieces besides a poisoned Kankuro but Kankuro is supposed to be a pupet specialist, He should know the design inside out, having added things every now and then, so whats to say he cant rebuild them?
As Kankuro is used to using Karasu (crow) and has had it for (one can assume) a long time, it is very likely that, had it been destroyed, he would rebuild the same design straight away. If your used to something and it's only been beaten once then why not take time to rebuild it....
Justice, 17thjuly06, 20:20GMT
:One, he did not build them, so that's a problem right there in their reapir. Two, they're pretty much done for, as Sasori made quite a mess out of them. Three, maybe he just feels that he should make his own puppet instead of relying on those of others. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 22:57, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The destruction of Kankuro's puppets...
Talk:NCAA Football 07

message: * This whole section reads like an editorial, not a factual encyclopedic entry. Go to review sites for opinions.  Categorize and list the bugs, that's fine. What someone "thinks" as far as what should or should not be in the game is totally irrevalent here. J-Dog 21:33, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bugs & Glitches
Talk:Scott's Food & Pharmacy

message: Kroger closed the majority of scott's stores with only a couple still remaining (which are essentially kroger stores with scott's signage up, not scott's stores)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.223.173.45 (talk) 21:12, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Store count not right
Talk:Foreign concessions in China

message: "Concessions such as Macau...... settled centuries before the Unequal Treaties came about in the Ming Dynasty. " Isn't it supposed to be "Qing" or "Ching"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.255.19.32 (talk) 13:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's rename this instead to Treaty ports, concessions and foreign settlements in China, to include more than just concessions. This way we can have a comprehensive list of all the territorial encroachments. -- Миборовский 06:41, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Perhaps just "foreign settlements" in China, because the desired focus is the culture and enclaves that sprang up when Europeans resided in China in their own communities. Treaty ports should be separate, IMO. (Encroachment in general should really be treated in the Unequal Treaties article.) Elle vécut heureuse à jamais (Be eudaimonic!) 15:16, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: European Enclaves

message: Just want to mention a point here.  It's not possible for Hong Kong and Macau "to be returned to the People's Republic of China."  The PRC was founded in 1949, and although there was some claim as "china", the actual entity of the PRC never possessed HK or Macau. By definition, you could say sovereignty was transferred based on historical claims, but at no time was HK/Macau returned to the PRC.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.76.151.114 (talk) 04:28, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording

message: Hi all, I'm trying to create a navbox for Foreign concessions in China, see draft here: User:Wl219/Template:Foreign concessions in China by country. Wiki-coding the navbox template is throwing me for a loop. Can more experienced editors please help? Thanks! Wl219 (talk) 06:28, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Navbox
Talk:The Banned (EastEnders)

message: This page got 104 views yesterday, when it was linked from a guardian.co.uk article (see above). That doesn't seem many but on average it gets around 20-25 views per day. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 17:58, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting 
Talk:Wellard

message: I just got into an edit war with WJH1992 but cannot revert again as I have already done so three times within 24 hours. Wellard, although a recurring character, like Tracy and Winston, has never left the show, therefore "1994—" is preferable to "1994–1995, 1996–1997, 1998–1999, 2000–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005, 2006—" or whatever. Any other opinions? anemoneIprojectors 16:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, so I reverted.Gungadin♦ 16:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war 

message: Something that I find rather interesting is that Wellard's (eventually fatal) illness is discovered immediately after Bianca notices a box of chocolates has gone missing, with noone admitting to having eaten them. Given that chocolate can be extremely toxic to dogs, producing similar symptoms to what Wellard suffered, I'm wondering if it was an intentional implication that Wellard had stolen and eaten said chocolates, leading to his death. Xmoogle (talk) 14:54, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt it would die that quickly after eating them. Also Ian was talking about the demise of Marsala Masood on the phone when that ginger brat overheard him, he didn't kill Wellard. UNI|SOUTH  16:48, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wellard's death - theobromine poisoning? 

message: Doesn't this word have a slang meaning in English? (Which the rest of the world wouldn't know) --IceHunter (talk) 23:46, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, as the article says: "Robbie named him Wellard (short for "well hard", meaning "very tough")." AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:48, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of the word 

message: I don't know if it will allow us to add anything to this article but there is a documentary on BBC Four at pm on Tuesday 2 March about TV animals and Wellard will be included. I can't get BBC Four but might check is out on iPlayer if I remember. anemoneprojectors│talk 16:33, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ooh I forgot about it, good stuff Frickative! Is it worth watching? anemoneprojectors talk 20:06, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah, I wouldn't really recommend it! There's only about five minutes of Wellard, and most of that is just clips from old episodes. Bit of an interview with Kyte's owner, but she didn't really say much beyond what's in the article now. Thanks for posting about it though, I'd never have heard of it otherwise! Frickative 20:28, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw it in The Sun TV guide going through the features as there was a big picture of Robbie and Wellard. I might watch the Wellard bit on iPlayer, since you've given the timing of it :) I'm glad it gave some new things to add, cos I didn't expect it to. anemoneprojectors talk 20:42, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paws, Claws & Videotape
Talk:London E20 (EastEnders)

message: Anybody think we should merge this short article to EastEnders#Setting? AnemoneProjectors (talk) 15:13, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.GunGagdinMoan 16:02, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! This this was pretty pointless on its own really. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 19:55, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: Should this redirect to E postal area or perhaps be a DAB page now this is a real postcode? 81.187.224.74 (talk) 17:25, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I think this page should be moved for the EastEnders redirect, and then turned into a disambiguation page for E postal area and EastEnders. I shall go and do that now. –anemoneprojectors– 12:18, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  change?
Talk:Global Kryner

message: I don't know if anyone's reading this, but I think a good deal of this article could do to be deleted, and other parts tightened up a quite a lot - it's obviously been written by some Eurovision fanboy/pundit who doesn't know that much about the band, and moreover, it's out of date, particularly in regard to the (bizarre) speculation on how the band will present themselves in the 2005 Eurovision Song Contest.
--Nfmccourt 19:47, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of TGV accidents

message: The introduction for this article states that there have been no fatalities on TGV trains, but at the end of the introduction for TGV, it says (emphasis added):
The TGV is generally a safe mode of transport, but there have been accidents; there have been train passenger fatalities twice from collisions and once due to terrorism, but nothing like the Eschede train disaster.
Which one of these are correct? -- Imperator3733 (talk) 02:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fatalities 

message: This page says: "31 December 1983: Terrorist bombing [...] Injuries: 5 dead, 50 injured".  TGV says "31 December 1983: A bomb allegedly planted by the terrorist organisation of Carlos the Jackal exploded on board a TGV from Marseille to Paris; two people were killed.".  Which is correct. HughesJohn (talk) 14:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, the TGV page says 2 people were killed on the TGV, so, the other 3 were killed at Marseilles. HughesJohn (talk) 14:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrorism 

message: Why is there no citation or references here? 81.111.115.63 (talk) 13:17, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation 
Talk:Beresfield rail accident

message: I think definitely so.  A freight train running into the back of another freight train, with no indication made of injuries, let alone fatalities, in my mind would not and could not constitute a 'disaster'.  Certainly something like a 'collision' or 'incident' would be more appropriate.  Ajayvius 14:47, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this article be renamed?
Talk:Pancharatna Kriti

message: This article really needs to be cleaned up. It's supposed to have information about the pañcaratna kṛtis, not the full text and translation, let alone notation! What is currently on this page would be more appropriate at Wikisource. --Siva 19:56, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup

message: # Wikify.
# Change indian language terms to english terms or clarify somehow.
# Formatting of text
# remove superflous and inappropriate fulltext of the song.
# References. 
--Lendorien (talk) 02:45, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: To do

message: This article has been tagged to be moved to wikisource for almost 2 years now. Something needs to be done. Either it needs to be moved or the article needs to be cleaned up. Leaving it like this is ridiculous. --Lendorien (talk) 00:05, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving to wikisource

message: * Some references
* Have made the article less orphanized
I really hope that we can get this article to be less orphanized. I'll look at the India article so maybe we can add this article as a link to culture.
Camdo2  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Camdo2 (talk • contribs) 19:04, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What has been finished

message: Hello, 
Can anyone please let me know whether there is any site to listen to the notations as well.... I found many sites to download the kritis and songs...but not the audible notations..
Thanks a million in advance.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.75.82 (talk) 19:13, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audible Notation
Talk:Spencerport High School

message: I feel there is more to say about spencerport high school, perhaps some reference to academic rating, results of state testing, comparison to other rochester school etc.
*  The swim team page should not be merged with the high school page.  The swim page will contain more information specific to swimming and not the school at-large.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnellist (talk • contribs) 17:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Discussion
Talk:Land letter

message: The "Was it a just war?" secion of this article seems heavily POV, particularly with its flat assertions as accepted fact of controversial and disputed claims. LeoO3 20:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree the section is not right as it stands, but a section contrasting the claims of the letter with subsequent facts is justified.  Can we edit the section to an NPOV equilibrium and let the clear facts speak for themselves? --technopilgrim 04:36, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing has happened so I chopped it under WP:OR & WP:CITE rules. We need a 3rd party who has criticised the Land Letter in retrospect to re-include. Ashmoo 05:07, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Was it a just war?" section 

message: The article claimed that there are many Christian leaders who did not agree with arguments in the letter, by citing Opposition to the Iraq War in the last paragraph, which reads:
 It should be noted that many Christian leaders did not agree with these arguments. See Opposition to the Iraq War.
However, there is no mention to any Christian leaders in the Opposition to the Iraq War article. Therefore, I have added a citation request next to the word many. frankywong2000 02:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you missed the section Opposition_to_the_Iraq_War#Religious_opposition. Rocksong 03:04, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian leaders who did not agree with arguments in the letter 

message: I added two external links, one to the homepage of the ERLC, and the other to the ERLC's text of the letter itself.
perko 04:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For better or worse, this is an historic letter.  Should we work on bringing a copy of the Land Letter into Wikipedia?  Is there a copyright problem?  Doug youvan (talk) 23:01, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a link to a copy would be better. This is an encyclopedia, not an archive. Quoting key sections would be acceptable though. Ashmoo (talk) 08:52, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added external links 

message: The importance scale for this article takes me here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Christianity/Assessment#Importance_scale.  I'd say that is the wrong place to have the importance of this letter graded. Doug youvan (talk) 23:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Low Importance? 

message: As of today's date, a search of http://www.sbc.net/search/sbcsearchengine.asp?cmd=search&SearchForm=%25%25SearchForm%25%25&indexcode=SBC%2C+IMB%2C+NAMB%2C+ANNUITY%2C+LIFEWAY%2C+WMU%2C+ERLC%2C+SEMINARIES&fuzzy=&stemming=&phonic=&natLang=&maxFiles=10&request=Land+letter&Submit=Search yields "No Results".  Why? Doug youvan (talk) 23:31, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No references at sbc.net? 

message: Have any of the signatories repudiated it since they signed it???  Or do they still all believe that the invasion was "just"???  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.154.2.8 (talk) 14:35, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Have any of the signatories repudiated it???
Talk:Musashi Gundoh

message: I roughly translated the earlier half of the Japanese article, but English is not my first language. Please feel free to correct/expand it.Thanx.--Kzaral 03:50, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The official spelling of "GUN道" is "GUNDOH".
(see DVD package or BS-i page)
I think this page should be renamed as "Musashi Gundoh".
:While I do think that spelling is very likely, I couldn't see any DVD packages on that page. Could you provide the link we can see it? The best I could find on the net was something like this.--Kzaral 19:43, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, now I get it. BS-i page does say 'Gundoh' in episodes section. I'll move the article. Thanks.--Kzaral 19:46, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Sorry, it indeed had probrems. I should have not just copy+pasted to move the article as I did above. Fortunately, this article already had a proper treatment (history merge) by other kind editors. Kzaral (talk) 04:34, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming page title 

message: I cleaned up the english on this page right down to the start of the 'Ayakashi Side' section, but it's still not perfect. The grammar is better now, but I know how you guys are about tone, and I probably made a bunch of mistakes anyway. If no-one else does it, I'll do the second half of the article later. 84.9.81.166 15:57, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning up the english 

message: I absolutely love this article. Voretustalk 17:14, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps we should all pledge to leave this page in all it's glory. Sunshard (talk) 11:55, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar 

message: Wasn't there a section on the anime's poor reception and production difficulties before?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.84.185.61 (talk) 02:37, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notoriety 
Talk:Sydenham rail disaster

message: I have assessed the article as B-Class and mid importance. There is some material that needs citations, but not enough to warrant anything lower than B-Class; however more references should be sought (an example is "A wrong-side failure of the signalling system, as a result of human intervention, was believed to be the cause"). Callanecc (talk) 15:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: further references have been added and coordinates included. Geez-oz (talk) 12:40, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: B-Class Assessment

message: suggest the Stub Template within WP_Australia should be removed, contradicts the start class template on TrainsWikiProject and the article has been expanded
Geez-oz (talk) 01:19, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommend removal of Stub Template 

message: For completness the article would benefit with information regarding the quote...
:The driver of the second train (the Bankstown train) was charged with manslaughter, accused of being under the influence of alcohol[5]
Did the Train Driver 'Harold Joseph O'Neill' get convicted of the manslaughter charge?
I have not been able to find a follow up source stating a conviction or cleared of charges
:reference found re driver acquital and added to article, but now... 
:no reference could be found to the conviction or acquital of the signal electrician!
Geez-oz (talk) 02:11, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional information and references re. Driver 
Talk:Church of the Poison Mind

message: I tried to fix that lack of space between 'the' and 'United States' (previously "USA").  Couldn't get it to work, so I gave up. -Zeno Izen 20:04, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Was the song and/or the group as a whole against Christianity? Because I am wondering if they were implying the "church of the poison mind" was christianity? I thought this subject might need some clarification on what was the "church of the poison mind" exactly.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.62.27.163 (talk) 21:01, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I read somewhere that the Church of the Poison Mind was drugs. Basically, comparing drug addiction to being brainwashed by a cult, and withdrawal to deprogramming, that sort of thing. Stonemason89 (talk) 22:12, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

text: In an interview in the early 90's on MuchMusic, Boy George openly admitted it was a position taken by the LDS Church (Mormons) that Homosexuality was evil.  The LDS Church has since changed their stance, and only the "act" of Homosexual Sex is evil, and will not take a position on whether it's nature or nurture.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.213.82.151 (talk) 20:42, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What exactly was the "Church of the Poison Mind"?
Talk:Ken Uston

message: Is this the same Ken Uston who wrote Mastering Pac-man? --Drgs100 20:05, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, I believe so. SmartGuy 20:14, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well that is interesting.
Yes this is also the same man who was featured on 60 Minutes with Harry Reasoner.68.105.187.208 22:56, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment 

message: I know I can undertake as well as others, but I am surprised at the lack of detail about his personal. Especially interesting is the note about him ‘dying in his apartment’ in Paris. It would imply his family was not with him OR he was no longer married. Any thoughts?THX1136 (talk) 01:59, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal Life?