lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Indian reductions in the Andes

message: Could the user who moved this article from Reduction (town) to its present title read WP:NAME and fix the multitude of redirects and double redirects caused by the renaming? This article should be called Indian reduction (singular, lowercase "r"). —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 14:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved article 

message: Hardly seems neutral when it starts out with a claim that the goal of Jesuit missionaries was to increase silver production. No one, much less a Jesuit, forced the Yaqui to do much of anything they didn't want to do until well into the 19th and 20th century. This was due in part of the fierce resistance by the Yaqui and in part because there wasn't silver around where they lived.  Many Wikipedia have a POV problem when reporting on the Catholic faith.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.3.142.26 (talk) 04:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV issue 

message: This article was already focused on the Andes, rather than reducciones in general, so my edits reflected that specificity. I think the article should be renamed to "Indian Reductions in the Andes" or others should add content about reducciones outside of this region. I'm a new contributor to Wikipedia, so please forgive my naivety. --Bedhead90 (talk) 17:33, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You are quite correct. Anmccaff (talk) 18:37, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to me that the best title for this article is Andean reductions.  Some people (not me) object to the use of the word "Indian."  If I don't hear any objections, I'll change the title.  Smallchief (talk  00:56, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: On reflection I think Bedhead has it right.  The title should be "Indian reductions in the Andes." Smallchief (talk  01:43, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change title or expand content
Talk:Maria Bonnevie

message: www.mariabonnevie.com  is not Maria's home page.
Den hvite Viking (The White Viking) first theater role???? .--85.220.29.144 (talk) 16:14, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Portrait of a Killer

message: I don't know if this comment fits in the article,  but I've read the new book (2nd edition?)
and found it absolutely terrible.  For the first time in my life I felt that I should retrun the book to the bookstore for a full refund.
For what it is worth, she seems to show that the paper used to write some of the letters was available to Sickert.  But there is a long way from that to saying that Sickert is J the R.
205.147.242.4 14:54, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: This entire page is crying out for citations.  Which critics mentioned these things?  When?--Nalvage 20:47, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Critics point out...

message: Where did she say this? This article is useless if it appears to be entirely hearsay. (Saboater 13:53, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Paper Match

message: Today's Daily Mail reports that DNA research on evidence made available by a collector has definitively identified Jack the Ripper as Aaron Kosminski. Kosminski was a polish immigrant who had previously been suspected. Since the article is in advance of the release of a book about the DNA studies done, I thought it was worth a mention, but not a change. The article Jack the Ripper Unmaskedlays out a convincing case. SeorsaSeorsa (talk) 20:17, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New report of DNA research definitively identifying Aaron Kosminski as the Ripper 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved.   -- Calidum 19:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Portrait of a Killer: Jack the Ripper—Case Closed →  – Per WP:SUBTITLE. 207.161.86.162 (talk) 03:34, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:24, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 September 2020 

message: ...if she were a man or British, her theory [of Sickert as the Ripper] would have been accepted. 
:But the British man who first proposed the theory has been universally dismissed as a fraud. Valetude (talk) 23:42, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Male-envy?
Talk:María Conchita Alonso

message: Dead?  If she appeared on Hannity & Colmes in 2007, and died in 2006, is there something that Hannity & Colmes know that I don't?
Nero42 (talk) 15:47, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: For the Filmography table:
* Drama Queens (RuPaul's Drag Race)
---Another Believer (Talk) 23:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Drag Race'' appearance
Talk:Maria Della Costa

message: Mentioning her age (86 now) does not seem to be useful - time (unlike year of birth) goes on...Super48paul (talk) 10:43, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age  
Talk:María Dolores Pradera

message: The Spanish Wikipedia page lists a different birth year:
"María Dolores Fernández Pradera (Madrid, 29 de agosto de 1924), conocida artísticamente como María Dolores Pradera, cantante melódica y actriz española."
````  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Markfhp (talk • contribs) 18:44, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes that has been correcetd.  Jezhotwells (talk) 12:27, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  BIrth date? 

message: Several Spanish-language news sources (and Twitter) are reporting that she died. PF4Eva (talk) 00:33, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Talk:Maria Ewing

message: Since Maria Ewing is no longer married to Peter Hall, should we delete "Lady Hall" from her name at the opening?  DJRafe (talk) 00:29, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lady Hall, use thereof

message: It seems that Maria Ewing has not performed in the met since 1997. I can't find any information about what she has done in the past decade. Where is she? AdamChapman (talk) 22:00, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Still alive as of March 2009.  A Google News search turned up a March 2003 performance; I didn't look very hard for something more recent.  -- John Broughton   (♫♫) 21:22, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Where is she?

message: The article ends "Ewing makes her home near her birthplace" [which is Detroit]. The only source cited is a Guardian article from 2003 (so hardly current), which states explicitly "Home for Detroit-born Ewing is now a corner of a country estate in Sussex [England], surrounded by fields of sheep". Huh? GrindtXX (talk) 22:08, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home 

message: Anyone who follows this talk page should be aware that an editor is ranting about Rebecca Hall and is claiming that she has none of the ancestry attributed to her via Maria Ewing.  The editor is just ranting and cannot provide any basis for this claim.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:37, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  An editor is ranting 

message: On Finding Your Roots, January 4, 2022, researching the background of Rebecca Hall, census records were produced showing that Maria Ewing's paternal grandfather was of mixed African-American race, ("mulatto").This should be incorporated into this page, in my opinion.  Marty Mangold (talk) 01:25, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Father's History

message: The videography and discography in this article were constructed using images of the covers of Ewing's albums published by amazon and discogs. Niggle1892 (talk) 15:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A note on sources
Talk:Maria Fyfe

message: Guardian 2005 website has quote on - is this a suitable source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zigzague (talk) 14:43, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Maria Hinojosa

message: I’m one of the average arrogant Yanquis: I thot I wa clever to start with “inojosa” and only then resorted to El Norte-esque guesses like “ inohosa”. Well, it’s clear 2 redirects are  called for, and likely more, for other needed or worthwhile ones.--JerzyA (talk) 05:39, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rdrs from Yank misspellings  

message: This article is chaotic, jumping around chronologically, and needs reorganization. Normal Wikipedia biographical articles are written in chronological order. 
They summarize the key significance and/or achievements of the individual in the lede -- in one to three paragraphs. See: MOS:LEADBIO
But -- after that short summary -- per MOS:CHRONOLOGICAL, the main body of the article should start with early life / education / career, in the titled sections, before progressing, chronologically, into their current life, roles and activity.  This is important because "past is prologue" and gives clarifying context to subsequent developments in the life and career of the individual.
Personal life may be left to the end of the article, in a separate "Personal life" section -- to the extent that their personal life is not identified with the reasons for the individual's notoriety. (For instance, if their family and personal friends are not prominent figures in their own right, nor significantly involved with the article-subject's career and notoriety, then it is OK to save them as an afterthought. Otherwise, their involvement should be more appropriately included in the main chronological body of the article).
:~ Penlite (talk) 14:07, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chaotic - needs chronological order
Talk:María Inés Falconi

message: I've added one references which is in Spanish and may have been written by the subject.  The article needs expansion and more, reliable, third party references in English.  I have left a message on the Talk page of the original creator to this effect.--Plad2 (talk) 07:16, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs work 
Talk:Maria Irene Fornes

message: this need sso much work...maybe a re-write.
There are two articles on Fornes on this website, one in which her name contains accents, one in which her name does not contain accents. Anyone know how to merge them? Dreadheadx 13:12, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Doctor Nitrus Brio

message: Should be removed from Doctor Neo Cortex and returned to this article. Brio was responsible for perfecting the design, Cortex just took the credit for it. Goroliath 14:58, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "The Evolv-O-Ray" Production Painting (Crash Bandicoot)

message: Currently, N Brio has his own article. But does he really need one? In comparison to all the other characters who have articles, (who have all appeared in at least half of the games), N Brio has only appeared in four (of which he only spoke in two), and has really only had a decently major role in the first. Personally, he does not have enough material to work with to deserve an article. Nina Cortex does (or will do once Titans comes out) and she doesn't have an article. N Tropy has appeared in more games than Brio, and he doesn't have an article. So why, incidently, does Brio? Just a suggestion. CBFan 11:03, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I know. I was considering merging this page into the list, but I think I should consult the other Wikipedians first. Cat's Tuxedo 14:44, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: N. Brio Article
Talk:Maria Jepsen

message: see here:  and here: --Tresckow 01:51, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  first female luheran bishop worldwide 
Talk:List of All That episodes

message: I dont know about yall, but I am doin my best to reedit this list by adding episode lists like other episode list articles. So it would be nice of yall to help. Thanks in advance--Wikialexdx (talk) 00:08, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update this article 

message: Ok, when The N comes to air 7-10, I would like to fill up the entire seasons, and send them to a new article. So it would be nice if yall helped too. Thanks--Wikialexdx (talk) 15:31, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seasons 7-10 
Talk:Maria Kliegel

message: The Mandela episode needs to be told much shorter, more factually, and with a source. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:04, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good, I will work on it!  Toni Sułek (talk) 13:27, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mandela
Talk:María Kodama

message: This article is in bad shape.  I'll see what I can do about cleaning it up.Wuapinmon (talk) 19:03, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad Shape

message: Seems very biased against Ms Kodama. The reference http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/07/12/1057783281684.html which is quoted in the text says Di Giovanni helped Borges get a divorce ("di Giovanni was to later engineer a trip to Cordoba to facilitate Borges's divorce from his first wife, Elsa Astete Millan"). Yet the text casts doubts on the legality of the marriage of Borges to Kodama, because he supposedly did not divorce Millan.  Sardath (talk) 00:21, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Biased and possibly inaccurate

message: I've made what I think are some improvements towards greater clarity and less bias and added a useful source. There was a footnote in the article, saying 
The Spanish-language Wikipedia, at http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mar%C3%ADa_Kodama, notes, "Según Alejandro Vaccaro, presidente de la Sociedad Argentina de Escritores (SADE) y biógrafo de Jorge Luis Borges, 'El casamiento de Borges y Kodama es nulo porque él no se podía volver a casar: ya estaba casado desde 1967 con Elsa Estete Millán, de quien se había separado en 1970 sin divorcio, porque no existía' (en esas fechas en Argentina)" ("According to Alejandro Vaccaro, president of the Argentine Society of Writers (SADE) and biographer of Jorge Luis Borges, 'The marriage of Borges and Kodama is void ab initio because he could not marry again:  he was already married, from 1967, to Elsa Estete Millán, from whom he had separated in 1970 without divorce, because it did not exist (at that time in Argentina)").
I removed it because the Wikipedia cannot refer to itself, as it changes all the time. Morever this statement is in fact no longer part of the Spanish article on Kodama. Finally the argument expressed in the statement even if valid, which may or may not be true, is not very relevant because Kodama's ownership of the Borges estate is also based on two wills written six years apart. Besides there doesn't seem to be any record of a sucessful legal challenege of the Borges-Kodama marriage. That would be worth mentioning but it doesn't seem to exist.Sardath (talk) 03:56, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Improved

message: What of her dying without a will?
See, for instance: 
Needs some addition. TuckerResearch (talk) 16:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dying without a will
Talk:Maria Koroleva

message: checking somethingon this here random article ummmmm, hold on
 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.175.71.183 (talk) 23:52, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  checkin something 
Talk:María Lavalle Urbina

message: I don't have access to research resources (including reference links) so I can't do any of the fact checking myself but while I was going through adding wikilinks, some of the information didn't line up with the articles I was linking to, especially in the awards section: I couldn't find any other reference in any other article to a "World Association of Women Journalists and Writers" or "National Institute of Women"; Woman of the Year is too vague as it doesn't indicate what organization awarded it; and the closest I could find to a "UN award for distinguished services rendered to the cause of human rights" was the United Nations Prize in the Field of Human Rights which is listed as a separate award she received (in a different year than is listed on the page for the Prize itself). There is also no context for the sentence "This is especially notable because it was the first and only award ever given to a woman and would remain so until December 1973" which is presumably in reference to the nonexistent UN award. There's also only one reference for the whole section. I would obviously fix this up myself if I was able to use Google on this computer! ♥Acorimori♦ 19:02, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some of this information seems incorrect
Talk:List of You Can't Do That on Television episodes

message: Somebody put a lot of work on this article, and they are very much appreciated. I'm a bit curious, though, as to why the table cells are inconsistently coloured? What I mean is, the background colours alternate for the most part, but there are several instances in which the same background colour is used two or three times in series before the colour switches to the alternate. If this was intentional, there's no key explaining this representation.
Christopher, Sheridan, OR (talk) 01:09, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent, non-alternating, background colour 

message: This is a lot of erroneous and bogus information in the episode guide. I have made corrections in the episodes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.20.186.10 (talk) 15:04, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A lot of Misinformation in the episode guide
Talk:Maria McKee

message: Maria is a very attractive woman.  This picture makes her look like a Barnum clown. Unless this is meant with some sort of punk irony, I'd like to think we can do a little better.  Jackbox1971 (talk) 02:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Find a better photo? 

message: I may be mistaken, but I'm under the impression that Tench's perspective on their relationship was provided in his song "You Little Thief" - which was also a hit for Feargal Sharkey. Gwladys24 (talk) 22:31, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re "A Good Heart" 

message: Here is a link to the second performance:
Maria McKee, Show Me Heaven, Hebden Bridge, 4 July 2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wx_dd4xu9z0
Other than this, google did not return any reliable sources for the Dublin Pride performance.  She is listed in the 2008: “Always the bridesmaid, never the bride” performer lineup:
http://www.dublinpride.ie/what-is-dublin-pride/
Almost all other references returned by google were copies of the Wikipedia article.  
Robert.Harker (talk) 20:12, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Show Me Heaven" public performance 
Talk:Maria Mercedes (actress)

message: Maria Mercedes (actor) → Maria Mercedes – The current article at :Maria Mercedes is simply a redirect to the disambiguation page :Mercedes. As there is no other Maria Mercedes, it would make sense for :Maria Mercedes (actor) to be moved there. — Robwingfield (talk) 17:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Oppose for now.  There is, of course, at least one other Maria Mercedes, the one to which the redirect used to go: Infanta Maria de las Mercedes of Spain which is now a redirect to Mercedes of Spain, which is itself a disambiguation page, the original article for that Maria Mercedes is now at Mercedes, Princess of Asturias.  So the proponent's original claim is false.  That doesn't mean that there couldn't be some rearranging, possibly even ending up as this was proposed (making sure there is also an appropriate disambiguation page or disambiguation line), but nobody should jump into it without considering that one and looking into the possibility of some other Maria Mercedes, especially if another one also has a Wikipedia article. Gene Nygaard 17:23, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Add any additional comments
*In response to Gene Nygaard above, that's a María de las Mercedes, not Maria Mercedes.  I would propose to put an "other uses" or suchlike template on the Maria Mercedes article if it were moved.  Robwingfield (talk) 17:32, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Maria Muldaur

message: Usually there's a piece in bio articles about parents and kids but none of that is here.  Do we not know?  72.86.42.38 (talk) 17:36, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh, there's Jenni Muldaur, for starters.  First clue to spot when an article is little more than a fanboy exercise is when it fails to mention something as important and obvious as that. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions  20:12, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Parents? Kids?
Talk:Maria Schneider (musician)

message: i'll just leave this here. apparently fraudulent claims against youtube go a long way to undermining "advocacy for musicians", and so does cooperation with a virgin-islands-based outfit that looks even worse in court than she does. --Snotty (talk) 16:52, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: What exactly are you saying should be changed about the article? In addition to clarifying what you believe should be changed, could you also provide more links to other sources on this matter? Sethcampbell7293 (talk) 17:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chief Scout (Scouting Ireland)

message: Proper name is "Chief Scout"; disabliguate with (Scouting Ireland).  --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  20:37, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename
Talk:Maria Taylor (musician)

message: This article has been copied from allmusic.com, here:
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&token=ADFEAEE47E19D948AF7020C9913345DBB17DA45B8963F2810A2D4B5CD0FB324780117CCC5BFCBABFE6A139B666A7E02CA45A089FC8E452FFD6663D2DFC93&sql=11:lq2ibkh90akv~T1
This is what I found on wikipedia about this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights#Using_copyrighted_work_from_others
Specifically, "copyright law governs the creative expression of ideas, not the ideas or information themselves. Therefore, it is legal to read an encyclopedia article or other work, reformulate the concepts in your own words, and submit it to Wikipedia. However, it would still be unethical (but not illegal) to do so without citing the original as a reference."
Clearly, that hasn't been done here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lucy1981 (talk • contribs) 07:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article copied in its entirety from allmusic.com 

message: Can you provide a source for this claim?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.111.81.184 (talk) 18:55, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  On again off again girlfriend of Conor Oberst?? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: (non-admin closure) MOVED User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 01:13, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Maria Taylor →  – Based on page views compared to Maria Taylor (analyst), the musician is not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Some might even argue the analyst is the PT, but I'll be conservative at this point in her career and say WP:NOPRIMARYTOPIC. —Bagumba (talk) 09:55, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 July 2021
Talk:María Teresa Fernández de la Vega

message: maria teresa is now among a select group of woman being talked about nowadays in spain asorime minister for 2012.She presently holds high titles from the escuela idiomas in french ,english and german.Along with carme chacon,teresa jumenez and esperanza aguirre they make up what is known as in spanish as the four woman horse riders 
raquel samper comunidad judia murcia  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Murcia fluent (talk • contribs) 06:51, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  maite  