Talk:Acanthocephala

message: The body of this is written in a pretty awkward manner - I'll try to come back and clean this up later if nobody beats me to it.
Ok, I've started cleaning this up, it's kinda mixed up. work in progress...
There, any comments? Anilocra 14:18, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article refers to a common name (in the Proboscis section), but I don't see a common name mentioned, only the scientific name... Cryptoid 19:07, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. SimonJones 12:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name 

message: Article is good, but lacks any inline citations. With inline citations and a slight expansion on the lead, this article is B quality. J. Hall • (Talk) 17:32, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've bumped the importance up to mid; it's a phylum, though a fairly minor and uncertain one so I think mid importance is high enough. Richard001 (talk) 04:28, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't want to step on any toes by editing outside by area of expertise, but I think some of the language in the "Brain-jacking" section should be revised.  As is, it seems to indicate that the worm(s) consciously choose to manipulate the crustacean host's behavior to achieve a desired effect, namely transmission to the duck through consumption.  Statements such as these fuel the argument that these worms "could never have evolved such a complex behavior" and leads to dozens of flame wars on Intelligent Design forums.  I believe it would be better to rephrase these statements to avoid any implications.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.49.32.27 (talk) 15:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article assessment 

message: This section is very interesting, except that the reference text is referring to a different phylum. Those pictures are clearly nematodes. Unless anyone can find evidence that thorny-headed worms are used in medicine, I am deleting this.169.232.131.133 (talk) 22:15, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Added template for citation reflist. DferDaisy (talk) 03:37, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Use in Medicine

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Acanthocephala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080420115055/http://parasitology.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de:80/login/n/h/0008.html to http://parasitology.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de/login/n/h/0008.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060529011929/http://ryoko.biosci.ohio-state.edu:80/~parasite/taxonomic_aaa.html to http://ryoko.biosci.ohio-state.edu/~parasite/taxonomic_aaa.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:45, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Reviewed links DferDaisy (talk) 03:39, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Inadvertently didn't add explanation to edit, so here it is: Deleted external links to dead sites, sites of lists of parasites, and archived site containing outdated information (this article is more up to date). Only links to Wikipedia's sister projects remaining in External links section. DferDaisy (talk) 03:34, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links removed