lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Anti-Americanism

message: I removed a sentence and the two sources, references 91 and 92, that were given. 92 is a dead link, and 91 is over 10 years old, so does not contain the "latest polls". It is obviously way out-of-date if you look at the Google translate, since it includes Belorussia and China among Russia's main enemies. Currently Belorussia is supporting Putin's war against Ukraine, and China is also more an ally than an enemy. NightHeron (talk) NightHeron (talk) 20:36, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed poorly sourced sentence about Russia 

message: Change the misspelled word "Paraguyan" to "Paraguayan", only. Wuwei Emerald (talk) 17:10, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Thanks. NightHeron (talk) 18:00, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 July 2023 

message: The picture is not a good example of Anti Americanism in Southeast Asia.Malaysia is rarely anti American. It's more criticizing the American support of Israel and some incidents that happen during the War on Terror Kaukênteo (talk) 09:38, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and I would support removing that photo from the article. There's a more general problem with this article, in that several of the photos are really about protests against specific actions by the US (and one is about German anti-Dutch propaganda in 1944). The assumption that these protests were due to "anti-Americanism" is unsupported by sources and constitutes WP:SYNTH. This article adopts an overly broad definition of the term "anti-Americanism". It's okay to say (with a source) that angry criticism of US actions is often perceived by many Americans as "anti-Americanism". But that's a perception, not a fact. Max Paul Friedman (reference [46]) has sharply criticized the tendency to label any criticism of the US as anti-Americanism. NightHeron (talk) 11:36, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Southeast Asia part contains a picture of a protest against the Islamophobic film "Innocence of Muslims" in Malaysia. However this is not an example of Anti Americanism. That is more like protesting against the movie than America itself.  

message: 2605:B100:903:5615:96CA:E801:DC51:58AC (talk) 20:23, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 March 2024 

message: Request to add Pro-Americanism under a suitable paragraph or See also. 
223.25.74.34 (talk) 04:10, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It might be a good idea to put it in the lead. —Panamitsu (talk) 04:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 March 2024
Talk:Sexual identity

message: When you have an Interest in someone, and that someone does not have to be cis or straight. You are attracted because of there personality, not gender. You are aloud to have a preference, no matter what anyone says. HappySadness999 (talk) 10:08, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pansexual 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ejgrimm (talk) 19:45, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: LLIB 1115 - Intro to Information Research

message: I noticed that "Heterosexual" is missing from the list of sexual identities. While heterosexuality is outside the realm of LGBTQ+ issues, I believe the purpose of this article is to define and explain sexual identities to someone who doesn't know anything about it. Excluding one of the most common ones would be doing a disservice to the new reader. 104.32.58.141 (talk) 02:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @104.32.58.141 heterosexuality isn't missing, it's just at the bottom of the list, nerd. Maybe you should read the entire list before commenting. (Note: I'm replying to my own comment) 104.32.58.141 (talk) 03:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Sexual Identities in Article: Missing Something?
Talk:Teddybears (band)

message: I don't know much about music, but I know what grindcore is and I have the Teddybears CD.  I don't think it's gridcore at all.  Furthermore, the reference that cites that it's grindcore is not working.  Can anyone verify?  Otherwise, I'm going to delete it. 67.161.75.213 05:55, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grindcore? 

message: Their WIKI page seems a little out of date, can anyone give it an update?. Also there is a track from them that I would really like to find out some information about it, It's called "Next To You", it samples AC-DC's classic track "Can I Sit Next To You Girl" it appears on NBA Live 2009. I can't seem to find any information about it, like if it will be released and on what album ect.
** Someone has uploaded it onto youtube, not sure if I am allowed to post it here but here it is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sUGg38DhIQ **
(**Delete if it bends the rules**)
Thanks to anyone that can give any info on the track. Barretto24 (talk) 00:32, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teddybears Update 

message: Should they be listed? I know that, at least, they remixed "Arma-Goddamn-Motherfuckin-Geddon" by Marilyn Manson. Paperxcrip (talk) 10:02, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remixes 

message: Hi!
I believe the band formed as Skull but this was probably in 87. They rehearsed at Fryshuset(Danvikstull/Stockholm) as Skull but had more names before Teddybears. 
Skull > Contra > Contradiction > Teddybears?...
Drummer Glenn went on to play in Monster.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monster_(band)
I think the first bass player of Skull was Jens Näsström from the band Morbid:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morbid_%28band%29
(I know he played with the band)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dagon5 (talk • contribs) 00:45, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skull formed before 91
Talk:German Navy

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 19:35, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: There is a discussion on the Frigate article which editors here may be interested in. 88.106.81.112 (talk) 05:19, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Frigate

message: A new organisation is in force since October, 1st, 2012 with the Naval Staff, the Fleet Command, and the Marineamt all being disbanded and replaced by the new Naval Command in Rostock. There were some more organisational changes to be reflected in this article. Who can do this? --KuK (talk) 11:31, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Working on that. But since there are numerous changes to take effect on 1 April, I am not in a hurry right now. 13:17, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, --KuK (talk) 06:30, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Organisation 
Talk:Human rights violation

message: Not sure if this should be singular or plural.
Wikipedia:Naming conventions (pluralization) says that a page name should be singular unless it is always referred to in the plural. My feeling is that sometimes in an encyclopedia people may discuss, e.g. Leftists (rightists) claims that action A is a human rights violation, while rightists (leftists) claim that action A is a necessary prerequisite for/consequence of human rights protection. 
So singular is probably right, IMHO.
Boud 10:32, 29 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Forcibly disappear

message: Should this be disappearance or disappearances? See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (pluralization). IMHO, words commonly used in this context include:
*disappearances (plural) There were many disappearances in Argentina.
*disappeared Many people were disappeared by the authorities in Argentina.
Is it used in the singular? So-and-so was disappeared by the security forces of country X. but i don't think human rights organizations write We consider X to be the victim of a disappearance, they're more likely to explain in more detail.
Anyway, that's why IMHO this entry is OK as a plural - later if the word is used in the singular it can be redirected.
Boud 10:39, 29 Jul 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:D. H. Lawrence

message: Quote 2409:4052:4E0B:D3B6:68F3:DD5F:2F70:115 (talk) 13:11, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please give some quotes of D .H. Lawrence 

message: When I was doing "A" level English, back in the years 1983 to 1985, I heard that a lost novel by D.H. Lawrence had been discovered in these years. If anyone knows anything 
about this lost Lawrence novel, mention of it would make an interesting addition to the article. YTKJ (talk) 22:03, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Novel discovered in the 1980s

message: In the penultimate paragraph under "Later life and career," I just added "citation needed" to "The return to Italy allowed him to renew old friendships; during these years he was particularly close to Aldous Huxley, who was to edit the first collection of Lawrence's letters after his death, along with a memoir." But it needs more than a citation to the source of this information. The memoir should be identified. It is probably Lawrence's memoir, but that's not even clear; it could be Huxley's. I'm not aware that Lawrence wrote a memoir. Maurice Magnus (talk) 13:27, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  explanation needed 

message: The article says "Lawrence spent his formative years in the coal mining town of Eastwood, Nottinghamshire"
The census records for 1891 and 1901 have him living with his parents and siblings; in 1891 in The Breach, and in 1901 in Walker Street.  Both those addresses are recorded in the census as being in Greasley.  Although today the postal addresses for both and the surrounding streets are in Eastwood, they were clearly at the time identified as being in Greasley and the article ought to reflect that. I know this constitutes original research so all I can do for now is leave this note here. 2600:1700:EA01:1090:D45E:CA:8424:865D (talk) 20:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early life - location = Greasley 

message: His baptism record of 29 November 1885 at St Mary Eastwood includes his parents' names but has his full name as David Herbert Richards Lawrence. 2600:1700:EA01:1090:D45E:CA:8424:865D (talk) 20:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Given names
Talk:Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk

message: As a layman reading about the RQ-4 Global Hawk, I believe it my responsibility to suggest to more capable editors that they define, or at least explain, what Block 30/Block 40 means in the context of this article, and ensure that its use with this subject is appropriately-tailored to non-specialists as well as those w/ a background in defense contracting/UAV's/spying/procurement. It reads like jargon otherwise.Joep01 (talk) 19:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: My thought too on reading here that block 30 was expensive to operate and block 40 was much cheaper. What are the differences that make this so ? - Rod57 (talk) 19:48, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

text: http://www.ais.org/~schnars/aero/tier.htm#tier2p 78.151.47.158 (talk) 06:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Block 30 vs. 40 vs. ?? 

message: I've removed the nuclear power section, because the reliable sources that discuss this ,  or  actually state that the mysterious " ultra-persistent propulsion and power system" was to be fitted to the Global Hawk, and in fact, they point out that the original Sandia report which the whole story appears to have been based  doesn't mention nuclear power at all. While the Spyflight source does mention the Global Hawk, it is not a reliable source.Nigel Ish (talk) 21:15, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nuclear power 

message: I find it odd that a good deal of criticism over the Global Hawk and how it is intended to replace the U-2 Dragon Lady is not present in the article in its current form.  While the Global Hawk can indeed remain aloft far longer than the U-2 Dragon Lady, it still does not favor well when compared to the U-2S; the Dragon Lady has more payload capacity (5,000lbs vs 3,000 lbs), a greater service ceiling (70,000ft vs 60,000ft), and supposedly twice the amount of available on-board power for the payload to make use of.
Source here: https://www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthompson/2014/02/20/u-2-vs-global-hawk-why-drones-arent-the-answer-to-every-military-need/
Granted, the article is quite old by now, but the only bit that I have not been able to verify as being valid at this point in time is the power supply.  Even without that, handicaps in the payload and service ceiling are valid concerns, particularly in a system that is still proving to be more expensive to operate in the long run.
If you desire more recent criticism, however, The Hill has an article published in November of 2019 (https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/11/18/china-pentagon-global-hawk-drone/) highlighting the shortcomings of the Global Hawk - particularly how the aircraft has a large radar cross section for its size, and how Iran was able to shoot down a Global Hawk. BlackAeronaut (talk) 13:23, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of Criticism? 

message: There are none installed on the Global Hawk; many internet sources are circular references right back to the Wikipedia page; all are non-authoritative in nature.  The "ALR-89" is a brochure capability that was never developed or purchased  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.249.80.215 (talk) 17:21, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defensive Systems
Talk:Asian Americans

message: The lead says that Asians are 6.5% of the US population (5.4% Asian alone), and the map says that Asians are 7.2% of the population. Can we correct the discrepancy between the map and the text? 021120x (talk) 21:58, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map Discrepancy 

message: , please stop with this. The changes you're making are contrary to the source, which supports the figures as they currently appear. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:49, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Khamarhaqam is now blocked. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:49, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox population figures 

message: Compare this response to the lead section:
The history of Asian Americans in the United States is a long and complex one, and the timeline for the beginning of Asian American history can be traced back to the early 1800s. The first documented arrival of Asian immigrants in the United States was in 1815, when Filipino sailors came to what is now known as Morro Bay, California.
However, the largest wave of Asian immigrants to the United States began in the mid-19th century, when Chinese immigrants arrived in California to work in the gold mines and on the Transcontinental Railroad. Japanese, Korean, and Filipino immigrants followed in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and many more Asian immigrants came to the United States in the decades that followed.
Throughout their history in the United States, Asian Americans have faced discrimination and persecution, including the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, and ongoing racism and violence against Asian Americans in recent years. Despite these challenges, Asian Americans have made significant contributions to American society and culture and have become an integral part of the country's history. Ishu (talk) 01:52, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Question:  "When did Asian American history begin?" Ishu (talk) 03:26, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chat GPT 

message: I've removed ethnic groups that were not listed in the 2020 U.S census graph. Several of the sources provided as of this version are not from 2020 or the 2020 U.S census. I'm pretty sure "Indo-Caribbean" entries would be included within the Asian Indian number. I doubt the 4.5M Indian-American number was solely from people who were born in or have parents directly from India, and the source is labelled with the year "2007" and retrieved from 2018! How are those numbers accurate to the 2020s decade? 
The Taiwanese American number is 213,774 according to the 2020 Census graph for Asian and Pacific Islander Americans.
I'm also seeing a message saying:  on the alleged Hong Kong American search retrieved in 2022. The source provided for the Bhutanese American number in the info graph does not exact numbers for them. The only mention of "Asia" is by region of foreign-birth. Clear Looking Glass (talk) 03:47, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnic groups in infobox
Talk:Wheat beer

message: Is it not the case that the the term "Weißbier" comes from the fact that the words wheat and white are etymologically related? So it would be so called not because the beer itself is light but because wheat is white... can someone confirm this, as I'm not entirely sure of this (so I've not changed it myself)?
--rdd. (talk) 20:44, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A Dutch friend of mine told me that it's because the beer is actually whiter (they'd say 'witbier' I think), like Hoegaarden, while the Germans, whose beer is more amber, say both weissbier and weizen - which is referring to 'wheat'; still I think there's also a play on words going on. Probably different people have always meant different things. Wikidea 09:28, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: Wheat Wine, though it has only come to be known recently as a style of beer in its own right, is now recognized by both BJCP and GABF, and warrants recognition on this page.  This page is a good resource: http://www.homebrewtalk.com/wiki/index.php/American-Style_Wheat_Wine_Ale
72.187.133.23 (talk) 21:45, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wheat Wine 

message: Uh, does this say what I think it says (Serving section)? If so, should immediately be amended, clearly not the correct term.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.67.58.136 (talk) 01:03, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Negro?
Talk:Xerox art

message: It is a question about whether computer scanners (similar in function to photocopiers but not photocopiers) are part of Xerox art.  What do others have to say about this?  --Daniel C. Boyer 16:39, 29 Jul 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I delinked it. Perhaps if the ghost page was disambiguated to explain this term it would be ok, but then this is not a dictionary, so maybe a Wiktionary link would be better. Angela 18:23, Oct 9, 2003 (UTC)
----
What's the name of a technique when you take a picture, make a copy of it, then make a copy of copy, and so on until the picture disappears (becomes black or white) - and then declare these series of pictures an art? --159.148.42.93 08:59, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:Jerome Cavanagh

message: His last name is spelled in different ways throughout the article.  That needs to be corrected.John Paul Parks (talk) 06:01, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: What is the Correct Spelling of his Last Name?

message: There is no definitive Cavanagh biography that I am aware of.  The best known book about Detroit in the 1960s in Thomas Sugrue's Origins of the Urban Crisis, but that book is extremely incomplete in that it contains nothing about Detroit's sky-high taxes and neglects the role of the riots in destroying the city.
The most thorough study of the riots is Sidney Fine's Violence in the Model City.-- Dinopup
----
The information about the 1967 riot was interesting, but a bit off-topic so I removed it. I didn't want to lose it, though, so I incorporated it in the article about the riot, 12th Street Riot. --Chowbok 20:34, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC)
I think the information about the riots is very relevant.  The riots illustrate the flaw in Cavanagh's position.  He defeated Miriani by siding with the blacks.  He marched with Martin Luther King down Woodward Avenue.  His naive appeasement efforts got him nowhere, because the riots came, and the people who actually worked and supported the city moved away.  The city's decline began in 1967 after the riots.  It has never recovered, and it never will.  The city is a wall-to-wall slum.   John Paul Parks (talk) 13:11, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of cities in Sweden

message: See also: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Swedish cities. -- Mic 18:13, Jul 29, 2003 (UTC)
There were never 135 cities (by the pre-1971 definition as a type of municipality) at the same time. In 1901 the number was 92. When the last city (Säffle) got its title in 1951 there were 133. In 1968 Öregrund was amalgamated with Östhammar, reducing the number to 132. From 1971 onwards no municipalities have this status and some more of the former cities were merged into other municipalities, as Torshälla into Eskilstuna, Gränna into Jönköping &c. So the total number should be 133. --Muniswede 21:03, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Whence these? They appear to be those of the current statistically defined "localities" (the term used by Statistics Sweden), which -- because of modern urban development and population growth -- look completely different from that of the historic cities. 
These population figures should be replaced by sourced historical figures (or estimates) for various periods. There is probably a bit of work involved in tracking this down, but I'm pretty sure the information is available. --Hegvald (talk) 08:19, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Two years later: I have removed the population figures. Sourced historical figures would be welcome, but the arbitrary unsourced figures that were there until now were misleading. --Hegvald (talk) 09:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population figures?
Talk:Zhang Chongren

message: Does this person really deserve an entry?  I mean, it looks like he is only significant because he was a friend of Hergé.  If we decide to keep it, most of the information from the Hergé article about him should be moved to this article.  Otherwise, this entry is pointless.  It gives no context as to why he was significant in Hergé's life or how he influenced him.  All just MHO of course...  —Frecklefoot 18:39, 29 Jul 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Globular cluster

message: Globular cluster#Properties contradicts the statement about the origin and population of the Global Clusters given earlier in the article. 2A02:8308:7094:6B00:38BA:2644:A90A:4C4D (talk) 10:39, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency in the description of the origin 

message: The intro states that " In spiral galaxies like the Milky Way, (GCs) are mostly found in the outer spheroidal part of the galaxy – the galactic halo." 
But the following section, "History of observations" claims that "A large majority of the Milky Way's globular clusters are found around the galactic core". 
I feel like the article might benefit from some clarification on this point. Nubur (talk) 08:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the issue may be the use of the word "outer". The halo surrounds the pancake-shaped spiral galaxy, but it isn't a shell. Globulars can orbit closer to the nucleus while (mostly) remaining in the halo. I think the conflict could be resolved by stating, "A large majority of the Milky Way's globular clusters are found in the halo around the galactic core". Praemonitus (talk) 14:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory info regarding distribution of milky way GCs
Talk:New Imperialism/Linking to the alternative version from the top of the article

message: I got this on my personal talk page:
::It is bad policy to effectively present a reader with two alternative rival pages. It gives the impression we are offering them two POVs where in fact we are in the business of one NPOV. Right now, the talk page where the temp maximum visibility. The article will be split soon once this dispute is put to rest and there's no reason cut out relevant information. This would set a very bad precedent. Jtdirl, a professional encyclopedist, has repeatedly stated that this goes against every principle of encyclopedic design.
::It's also unfair to all the other contributors who have worked on this article. It's also irresponsible to link such a page to an article that has attracted the kind of peer editing that we've seen on prominent articles, such as WWI and WWII. This is not solely my article, as PP claims. Others have been doing substantial work. 172 07:15, 29 Jul 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Cimon Avaro's 2 cents