lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Citron-crested cockatoo

message: :I took the picture from the German wikipedia and put it in the article.  To upload a picture, click on "Upload file" in the toolbox on the left side of your browser window.  Tomertalk 07:31, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: There is a section on the wiki for aviculture.  From one point of view, aviculture (birds in breeding programs and as pets) may clutter the section on the natural science of the birds and alternatively, from another point of view, this is acceptable.  The wiki natural science and aviculture pages already have many interlinks, but it is not clear where species specific aviculture pages should go.  Is there a wiki approved satisfatory format for this?  The avoculture section could extend to become a useful resourse, if it is facilitated.  In the future many birds will (sadly) become rarer and so extensive knowledge of birds in aviculture may help to save the species for reintroduction to the wild.    Similarly, other animals could have similar interlinking.
:I think the best place to take this up would be at WikiProject Birds, a project you might wish to join.  Cheers.  Tomertalk 22:44, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  For discussion 

message: Which particular part of the page is in dispute?
:There's a hidden note (HTML comment) on the page.  Subsequent edits have somewhat mootified it since I originally wrote it.  Tomertalk 21:52, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  <strike>Factual content of page</strike> 

message: Should "Yellow-crested Cockatoo" and "Citron-crested Cockatoo" be on the same page? Are these two birds subspecies of the same species? Snowman (talk) 18:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page organisation 
Talk:Rodolfo Herrero

message: yeah that was real helpful
I need some help here.  The man's last name is misspelled in the title.  It says Herrera, but it should say Herrero.  I could change the title page, but I am concerned that this will break links on other pages that link to here.  In other words, there is a link on the Carranza page to Herrera.  If I change the name of this page to Herrero, than that link won't work.  Is there some way to correct the name of this article and also change all the pages that link to this page? Ramon4 (talk) 04:13, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, it should be Herrero. Probably could use some bot to do it, but otherwise just manually change it in all articles listed under "What links here" (side toolbar), which is what I'm about to do so it might be empty by the time you read it. Then I'll move it.radek (talk) 08:27, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

text: Actually it seems Herrero redirects here so the links wouldn't turn red. But they need to be corrected anyway.radek (talk) 08:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

text: Except for user pages and project pages, it should be fixed.radek (talk) 08:37, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Otto Kretschmer

message: The article says that K. was unable to sink a captured ship using torpedoes and that "the weather ruled out use of the gun". Why would the use of the gun be affected by the weather? Presumably the gun could be fired at close range so visibility would not be an issue. A brief explanation would be helpful.Bill (talk) 04:10, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Try to imagine operating an unshielded 88m gun on a narrow, slippery metal deck with no guardrails while the Atlantic seas are constantly buffeting the boat from side to side. 2404:4404:147B:E400:F1AF:DD2:343C:1C43 (talk) 06:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Difficulty of sinking captured ship

message: Preserving here by providing this link; my rationale was: "Per the Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Military_history/Archive_163#Appropriateness_of_kill_lists_in_submariner_bios discussion, such lists are undue in skippers' bios". --K.e.coffman (talk) 05:35, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  November 2021 edit
Talk:French units of measurement

message: The article is completely lacking in any references at all. It appears to have been based off  a translation of the French version of this page, but that too doesn't appear to have any actual citations in it. Rhialto 02:10, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced

message: At User:Rhialto/french units, I have finished making a draft revised page, incorporating some of teh more recent changes on the French version of this page and using the same table layout in most other metrology articles. I look forward to comments on it before I copy it over onto this article. Rhialto 07:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Outstanding. Your new revision is a much-needed improvement in clarity and presentation. Indefatigable 13:46, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Refactored Page

message: I chose to spell metric units as metre, litre, gramme, kilogramme, tonne, based on the usual French/UK spelling of these words, which I feel is appropriate for this article. Rhialto 01:53, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling Convention

message: Several images useable in this article,
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
have been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a User --JOHNDOE (talk) 13:15, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Files nominated for deletion
Talk:Strategic alliance

message: possibilities of strategic alliance between Marks & Spancers and any yarn spinning mills
I think this page is wrong, it mixes up everything. A strategic alliance is a contractual agreementhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_venture
There is a huge difference between a strategic alliance and a joint venture. In a joint venture, two or more entities join to create a new enterprise with separate leadership and governance structure, away from the contributing (or owning) entities. A strategic alliance on the other hand, is a contractual agreement among two or more entities to cooperate and collaborate for a specific purpose, i.e.: supply chain, distribution, research, risk sharing, product development, national or international face for customers, etc. Edrigsbee (talk) 15:11, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Random thoughts
Talk:Ochakiv

message: Ochakiv is the official name of the town, while Ochakov is one of the historical names.--NightOnEarth 18:48, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose: 1) Ochakov is situated in the 100% Russophone area; 2) The town is known in English primarily in connection with its siege by Russians, when it was officially known as Ochakov. --Ghirlandajo 18:56, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  1) While I agree that Russian is the language of the majority there, it's nowhere close to 100% even in cities like Odessa and Mykolaiv, much less outside of big cities. Anyway, it doesn't seem to matter for cities like Mykolaiv, for which the Ukrainian spelling is used. 2) If you google the name "Ochakiv", you will see lots of travel sites, etc. If you search for "Ochakov" you will see more historical websites. I'm relatively new and don't know whether Google hits matter much, but in this case it's 28k-22k in favour of Ochakiv. I am aware of the idiotic revert war for Kiev and don't want to start something like that, but for the sake of accuracy, I think the spelling of the existing resort town is preferable over the spelling of a historical fortress. --NightOnEarth 20:37, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Just for the record: Kiev isn't the only exception. Odessa is another one. There may be more that don't pop up in my head right now. --Irpen 16:24, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Generally, yes. Just FYI, there are more exceptions: Odessa, Eupatoria, maybe more, but not much. So, you're basically right. --Irpen 02:38, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

text: The most important economic feature of Ochakov is probably the American base there, but still no mention of it in the article? Santamoly (talk) 09:19, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Moved. WhiteNight T | @ | C 23:47, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The most important economic feature of Ochakov is probably the American base there, but still no mention of it in the article? Santamoly (talk) 09:19, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Result

message: A source if you are interested.--Visnelma (talk) 19:26, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: A source
Talk:London School Board

message: There are a number of London School Board schools still surviving - often with the LSB monogram. Jackiespeel 17:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Surviving schools

message: The story of this School Board member, as given in ODNB article (by Donald P. Leinster-Mackay, ‘Diggle, Joseph Robert (1849–1917)’  accessed 20 Jan 2007]), if incorporated in this article, would add to its interest === Vernon White (talk) 21:37, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rev. Joseph Diggle

message: From 'London Today and Yesterday' Volume 2, Number 1, March 1937, page 8.
'At the corner of [present day Old Church Street] is the old parish church of St Mary [Chelsea Old Church on Google Maps]... adjoining is the Petyt Hall, an early eighteenth century building, which became the first Board School in London.' Jackiespeel (talk) 15:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  First SBL school
Talk:Stza

message: Was he in No-Cash? I dont think he was but the wikipedia page for No-Cash says he was.The Clydelishes Clyde 17:50, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It does? I don't see it saying that, and if it did, it'd be wrong. Cheeser1 18:23, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No-Cash

message: This article states:
"Stza played live in Leftöver Crack, the original incarnation of Choking Victim..."
Wrong. It is the other way around. --Pac 22:50, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: the formatting of that sentence is awkward, but it appears to be a list, one not chronoligically ordered. that is, stza played (or plays) live in leftover crack, played live in the original incarnation of choking victim (also, apparently all), played (or plays) solo acoustic stuff live, and played with the crack rock steady seven. maybe that paragraph needs a revision? how incredibly timely this reply was, right?--Totenkreuz 05:29, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual Inaccuracy 

message: Made a small edit on the explanation of the stage name, expanding on why the "za" is used. --66.169.239.183 (talk) 02:14, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: About the relationship with Wittney from DND is known that she claim that he is an abuser , i know as legal things we cant write that but a "supose abuser" or the breakup with Wittney couse she claimed he is an abuser , i think something about it can be wrote yep? Ezkibela (talk) 11:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stza as an abuser 

message: Stza is very intelligent, his music speaks volumes about his beliefs and understanding of the world we live in. From depression, dysfunction, suicide and drug use, to calls to action against inequality, racism, war, hypocrisy, and numerous human rights abuses carried out by the corrupt US government. The music is a call to action, about uniting everyone, and rising up and fighting an elite corporate government system that has murdered, lied, stolen from and abused millions of innocent people for decades. To rebuild a better world for all of humanity. 2601:987:8100:B450:78A8:B33B:3C94:A795 (talk) 04:04, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Call to action against corrupt government
Talk:Shot heard round the world

message: This article is undersourced already, but what sources are there that "the shot heard round the world" can refer to the assassination of Franz Ferdinand? The vague recollections of editors are not reliable sources.--Ermenrich (talk) 00:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I added some sources. Herostratus (talk) 18:06, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Franz Ferdinand 

message: An editor deleted most of the section "Widespread idiomatic use" with an edit summary of "this section is almost entirely trivial, ephemeral nonsense--thus largely deleted"; I restored it, partly on the basis of (at least partially) misleading edit summary (the material is not nonsense, all the sentences are correctly formed and express coherent thoughts), and also because it apparently wasn't noticed, being buried by some edits a couple of days later, and destruction of entire sections should be discussed beforehand, I think.
I get that the material is trivial to that editor. I get that that editor is not interested in, and does not care to read about, this sort of thing. So?
The article is not too long by our rubrics. The material is separated from other material and at the end of the article, so nobody has wade thru it to get to other material. The material is mostly referenced (that that isn't, any editor is welcome to add the refs, or tag the material as needing refs if they'd prefer). There are two separate articles pointed to in the section. {Shot Heard 'Round the World (baseball) and Shot heard round the world (soccer)).
And the material already exists. Other editors have done the work of compiling it an digging up the references. It's not like the question is should we dedicate time and effort to this section. Editors already have.
So given that, I guess the first question I'd ask is, for those readers that do want to read this material, that are looking for the material in this section (to, for example, explain a reference they have seen in some publication), for those readers who would be enlightened by seeing proof that phrase remains alive, and so forth... what exactly is the benefit to those readers of refusing to provide them with the material? Herostratus (talk) 06:31, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of "Widespread idiomatic use" section 

message: Hello, sorry for the Noob question (this is my first 'Talk' entry.)
In this entire article, should or should not the term 'Americans' be replaced by 'British Colonists' or something similar, since these events all occurred pre-July 1776?
Thanks,
BingoReefer42 (talk) 09:29, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Americans versus British Colonists 

message: In my opinion, the part saying "Which includes the mostly-unrelated French Revolution" should be removed, as the main idea of the article has barely any connection to the French Revolution. 216.181.232.154 (talk) 01:36, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of the French Revolution connection
Talk:Kohn Pedersen Fox

message: My concerns - there are no sources listed. No external articles from anywhere else supporting the statements in the article. PEsays (talk) 4:44, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I reverted that a little hastily, but if you want to change the article at least keep the references to their major projects. And try to tone down the cheerleading. Jasongetsdown 19:02, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  article change. 

message: A first section called "Recent work" is highly unusual. Syced (talk) 07:09, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree this could be seen as promotional formatting. I am going to switch the section so History shows up first. Please discuss here if you think this is an ill advised change. PubHobbyst (talk) 15:25, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  No history? 

message: Is it okay for this page to have this many images? I understand they're an architecture firm, but this almost seems excessive. I have not come across many architecture Wikipedia pages so maybe I'm just not aware of the norm on a page like this. PubHobbyst (talk) 15:23, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive Images of Buildings
Talk:DJ-Kicks

message: I've uploaded all of the images for the missing album articles so a gallery can be included here. I've used this format for now, which I quite like, but there are 29 albums in a single column, so people may feel it would be better in a different style. An option would be to have a gallery like the one in the Late Night Tales article. 
By the way, if anyone fancies starting articles for some of these missing articles, that would be good:
* DJ-Kicks: Stacey Pullen
* DJ-Kicks: DJ Cam
* DJ-Kicks: Terranova
* DJ-Kicks: Andrea Parker
* DJ-Kicks: DJ-Kicks: Kemistry & Storm
* DJ-Kicks: Trüby Trio
* DJ-Kicks: Vikter Duplaix
* DJ-Kicks: Chicken Lips
* DJ-Kicks: The Glimmers
* DJ-Kicks: Henrik Schwarz
And when there's more info available:
* DJ-Kicks: Hot Chip
Gram 11:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gallery

message: I have removed the album cover gallery from the article as it's use cannot be justified under fair use without in-depth discussion of each album - and that belongs on the individual album articles. Removing the gallery means the Fair Use Rationale template that appeared on this talk page was therefore irrelevant, so I've removed that too, and my previous whinge speedy deletions. Gram123 11:06, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use on images

message: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back to Mine: Adam Freeland
Basically, the state of the entire series of Back to Mine, DJ-Kicks, and Late Night Tales is such that if these articles were deleted, all those would be as well.  The discussion here may not set any precedent but if these articles are deleted, those will probably be next.  Feel free to express your opinion. - McCart42 (talk) 14:45, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of compilation series
Talk:Organizational citizenship behavior

message: A recurring theme in studies of very low-IQ individuals is that their social adaptation is greatly enhanced by certain personality traits, particularly persistence and a willingness to adhere to their community’s rules and norms. These findings dovetail with recent research in industrial-organizational psychology on the importance of workers’ "organizational citizenship behavior" (OCB; Organ, 1994) and "contextual performance" (Cascio, 1995). These are the more discretionary, pro-social job behaviors that contribute to a group’s or organization’s effectiveness, but which are more constrained by workers’ intent than ability - for example, helping others with heavy workloads and always being punctual. "Altruism" and "conscientiousness" seem to be the most important, but "courtesy," "sportsmanship," and "civic virtue" are other documented OCB factors (Organ, 1994). Supervisors and peers highly value these "will do" as distinct from "can do" attributes of workers. 
Above quote from Guttmundson. 19:08, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Opening paragraph does not contain any explanation, summary or otherwise, of what an OCB is.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeoEvilsbane (talk • contribs) 12:08, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is it 

message: The syntax in the last sentence is missing a comma after "This", it should read: "This, again, is a construct very similar to OCB." I think the section would be better off if this sentence was deleted completely. I don't think reiterating the fact that it's similar to OCB is necessary since it's already in the "Similar constructs" section. DPetruseski (talk) 03:19, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extra-role behavior section
Talk:Peaking power plant

message: This article seems to collapse two different things into one: peaker plants and load following plants (as described in this wikipedia article). I live in Chicago and I know we have at least two coal plants used as peakers (used in the summer to raise the power supply well above the base load demands in the winter and meet the summer air-conditioning load). So that seems to be using coal plants as peakers while they have a natural gas plant for load following (throughout the year). Any thoughts? Indexheavy (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Coal plants to meet the summer air-conditioning load? Producing heat to fight heat? That is horrendous. Put solar panels or your roofs! --82.113.113.82 (talk) 17:01, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  load following and peakers 

message: If you are referring to the Crawford and Fisk coal generating stations, they are base-load suppliers, not peakers. Both plants used to have gas turbines on sight that operated as peakers, but the ones at Crawford have been removed. I do not know if Fisk still runs them. In any case,  in Chicago, base-load power is supplied by nuclear and coal plants and coal plants do most of the load following for economic reasons. Gas turbines are used as peakers for the most part. This is the result of high gas prices in the midwest (transport costs are high).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.135.76.236 (talk) 14:56, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reply
Talk:Merogony

message: This doesn't look like a dab page to me at all.  It looks like two dicdefs on one page, neither of which belongs in an encylopedia. Tedernst | talk 19:12, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it to a stub instead of a dab cleanup. Tedernst | talk 21:11, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page linked to two names. Protozoal merogony is a redirect to a section of Apicomplexan life cycle. Merogony (ovum) was simply a redlink, not linked from any other article; there is no mention of merogony on Egg cell.
Merogony is mentioned on Eimeriorina and Neogregarinorida, which are both orders of apicomlexan. Maybe there is a topic to be written about. When that happens, this page could disambiguate the topics. For now, though, there isn't even one article with this title, let alone two or more. Therefore, I've redirected to the relevant section of Apicomplexan life cycle. Cnilep (talk) 06:44, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing to disambiguate (yet)