lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:2007–08 Mid-American Conference men's basketball standings

message: I've readded the Category:2007-08 NCAA Division I men's basketball season category.  I do not understand why the category continues to be removed.  This article is the standings for a basketball conference, during the 2007-08 college basketball season.  I cannot think of a category that is any more appropriate for it.  Instead of trying to figure out thought processes in edit summaries, I thought I would open the discussion here. X96lee15 (talk) 03:03, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category
Talk:CCB

message: 한국의 인터넷 게임방송사에서 진행하는 게임을 대회.
 Chaos : 워크래프트3를 기반으로하는 커스텀 유즈맵으로 공성전 스타일의 센티널, 스커지 두진영의 영웅을 유저가 임의 혹은 선택해서 대결하는 게임이다.
 현재 1차부터 14차에 이르기까지 진행이 되어가고 있으며 진행과 해설에는 홀스(사장)/진행, 빛돌(고인), Chojja, Ajax, Lds2 이상 해설로 진행되고 있으며
 한국의 인터넷 방송매체인 아프리카 TV를 통해 매주 화, 목 19:00시에 생방송 되고있다.
 
 CCB 공식 홈페이지 : []  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.65.92.192 (talk) 09:43, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCB / Chaos Clan battle.
Talk:Fos

message: Just one plain question in case I might be right with my concerns: FOS for French Onion Soup? Are you sure this belongs here? Might it not just be a joke?
91.54.249.6 (talk) 08:12, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: French Onion Soup

message: "Use of 50% background is not recommended since some users may see undesirable FOS effects."
What does mean here FOS ?
Thank you.
--AXRL (talk) 11:21, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: @AXRL hi 41.223.132.253 (talk) 12:28, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  About an L170 IBM PC monitor
Talk:WWWQ-HD2

message: I see the comment in the text for why there's a split in the list of station staff.  Is there a better way to indicate it with article headers (and keep the note in the comment)?  I contemplated "Primary staff" and "Support staff", but that doesn't appear to be an accurate  yet brief representation of what the comment says. RadioBoy2003 (talk) 03:08, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Personnel split

message: I miss 99X being on the normal radio. Its only available on HD now.
 --~~~~Marshall
:But one day, the format might be back again on a different frequency. You never know until we reach they day it happens. Georgia guy (talk) 13:56, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess it's good to keep dreaming!  :) --Evil Eccentric (talk) 03:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing the old 

message: This article needs a huge amount of editing.  For instance, shouldn't the article title be changed to W250BC, which currently redirects to WNNX (Rock 100.5)?  Also, WWWQ#99X needs to be completely rewritten.  I think we should reformat this article so one section is like "As WNNX" and then another section could be called "As W250BC" with two infoboxes.  The eras seem different enough to warrant separation (i.e. Dekker is relevant enough to mention, but he's not a current DJ).  Also, is the station callsign W250BC or WWWQ-HD2?  Or is it both?  I'd do this all myself but I'm busy with finals coming up next week.  Thanks in advance!  --Evil Eccentric (talk) 01:47, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, maybe there should even be three sections, for when it was online only.  --Evil Eccentric (talk) 01:50, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move and rewrite 

message: If a new station comes on at 97.9, what should we do to this article?? Radio station articles are normally supposed to follow station history, not callsign history. Look at WWWQ and WNNX as examples. Georgia guy (talk) 13:41, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What to do 

message: I think that:
The correct title of this article is 99X (Atlanta). It appears incorrectly here because of technical restrictions.
is a weird header for this article. Any thoughts?? Georgia guy (talk) 20:57, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird heading
Talk:Viv

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:39, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: VIV →  – Most meanings on the page seem to be at the lowercase, which as I recall is also our standard practice for terms with both capitalizations available. BD2412 T 21:50, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 May 2022
Template talk:Los Angeles Dodgers

message: I'm just curious: why is the template a darker shade of blue and not Dodger blue?  The color is named after the team and thus I would think it would be a nice touch to it.  Or is this an issue of just asthetics?--ip.address.conflict (talk) 15:25, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Template Color

message: I wanted to put Subway Series/New York Yankees instead of Subway Series*New York Yankees because the Subway Series for the Dodgers WAS the Yankees. Thoughts? Arnabdas (talk) 19:58, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subway Series and Yankees Rivalry format 

message: 1)  Fix the alphabetization of the Hall of Famers so that Vin Scully is between Wilbert Robinson and Duke Snider, not between Sandy Koufax and Tommy Lasorda.
2)  Also in the Hall of Famers list, insert Jaime Jarrin (who received the Ford C. Frick award in 1998) between Burleigh Grimes and Willie Keeler. 75.82.249.165 (talk) 20:28, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Spanneraol (talk) 21:33, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 September 2019 

message: 69.9.50.243 (talk) 19:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Terasail[✉] 16:55, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 November 2020
Talk:Pumping

message: I've reverted several edits that attempted to remove links to Sexual intercourse and/or Anal sex. My main concern is that this may be an attempt at censorship. Wikipedia is not censored. The usage appears to be legitimate; see for example the Urban Dictionary. I'm open to arguments for deleting these links—I had initially considered doing so myself, but had second thoughts about it.--Srleffler (talk) 23:37, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason I originally removed the entries was that I found it to be highly unlikely that anyone would be searching on the word "pumping" looking for an article on sex, and neither of the articles linked to mentioned the term.  If we want to assume that someone might be, then I think that one entry for Sexual intercourse should be enough.  While it would be possible to link to anal sex, Non-penetrative sex, Mammary intercourse, and who knows what else, it really doesn't serve the disambiguation page by listing endless variations on something that no one is likely to be looking for.  Sexual intercourse is our main article on this topic and links to a variety of others, so it seems like the best choice for this entry. --Xyzzyplugh (talk) 02:01, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK.--Srleffler (talk) 03:17, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Censorship?
Talk:R8A (New York City Subway car)

message: I will request deletion of article because there is no point of having a non-revnue subway car in the navel box.If you want to keep the article,please add articles about other non-revenue equipment. Examples are the R127-R134 contracts. Please add the other articles or I will request deletion of the article. Signed72.68.37.89 (talk) 18:03, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We should keep this page, it is still a subway car. If you want to create article articles for other non-revenue cars, go ahead, but you are going to have to create a user account and find reliable information for those cars. The Legendary Ranger (talk) 12:45, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

text: You know what? I'm not even gonna tamper with it. If you're still here just remove it from the navel box. Signed 72.68.37.89 (talk) 18:14, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't need to be deleted from the navbox and the article doesn't need to be deleted. Please see WP:OTHERSTUFF. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 18:27, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request deletetion of article. 

message: R8A (New York City Subway car) →  – There is no reason to disambiguate the page, per WP:DAB. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 02:48, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Template talk:AP Offensive Players of the Year

message: I added a small notation as to the number of times won for multiple-year winners.  There is nothing wrong with denoting the number of times a player has received the award. It is impressive, it fits just fine on the template, and it is info that is easy to miss.--2008Olympianchitchat 03:08, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of times won
Talk:Qiao Xing

message: There are many pictures we can use here.  What does the license "public" mean? --RaviC (talk) 10:00, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Set index articles on ships

message: Suerly this is an SIA nto a DAB? Abtract (talk) 01:02, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The set index template  has been updated to allow ((SIA|ships}} and a new parent category has been created: :Category: Set indices. Mountains have just changed their mountain index template (rather than making it use the new template) which is one way of doing it. The option is up to the Ships Project overseeing this but I thought I'd drop in the information so things can be slotted into the new structure. (Emperor (talk) 16:27, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this category might be better renamed "Category: Ship set index articles", based on the project efforts and the CFD discussion linked in the header.  -- JHunterJ (talk) 15:00, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If the discussion there is any indication then it looks like the majority would favour the renaming and it makes sense now it is a child of :Category:Set indices. To fit the structure of the others it'd need to be renamed to "Set indices on ships" though. I say propose it and see how it goes. (Emperor (talk) 15:41, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Set index
Talk:Napoleonic weaponry and warfare

message: I've added the npov template because the article contains some blatant pov content. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 03:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps it has since been fixed, but I am failing to see anything that I would consider "Blatant".  Could you point out examples, possibly along with arguments and/or explanations as to why it is non-neutral Point of View? -Verdatum (talk) 22:25, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: "Napoleonic" often refers to the period in which Napoleon I ruled France (and also goes hand-in-hand with start, the revolutions in France, to the end, the last coalition), therefore saying "Napoleonic weaponry and warfare" and only going on to talk about the French weaponry is silly. I propose the article also be expanded to weaponry and tactics of all countries and satellite states that were part of the revolutions/coalitions. After all, the Austrian air rifle is already mentioned in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ECCole 00 (talk • contribs) 08:01, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article's title
Talk:Abra Cadabra (film)

message: I wrote this article but I couldn't find enough information about it...Historybuffc13 (talk) 03:30, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you seen the film?  There are a number of people on IMDB who've been looking for it since last year and haven't been able to find it.  Heck, I can't even find any screenshots of it online, or any information except for the crew and production company. Esn (talk) 06:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: needs more info...
Talk:Michael Tobias

message: 2021 Bhutan: Conservation and Environmental Protection in the Himalayas, with Dr. Ugyen Tshewang and Jane Gray Morrison, Springer New York, Non-Fiction
2021 The Earth in Fragments: A Memoir, Nova Science Publishers, New York, Non-Fiction
2021 On the Nature of Ecological Paradox, with Jane Gray Morrison, Springer New York, Non-Fiction
2021 Ecological Reciprocity: A Treatise on Kindness, by Michael Charles Tobias and Jane Gray Morrison, Greek bilingual translation of complete work by Niki Stavrou, Nova Science Publishers, New York. (Non-Fiction)
2021 The Quantum Biosemiosphere, by Michael Charles Tobias and Jane Gray Morrison, Nova Science Publishers, New York. (Non-Fiction)
2022 The Maiden Voyage of Petrus van Stijn, by Michael Charles Tobias, Springer Nature Publisher, New York. (Fiction) 2601:8C3:8201:1B4B:D5FE:5921:63BD:CA08 (talk) 03:53, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latest 6 books by Michael Tobias should be listed:
Talk:Total Film

message: Following discussions with Johnuniq on my talk page, I understand that it is not the role of Wikipedia to provide links to each part of TF's website. However, given that TF's blog is hosted by Tumblr, and that it does not form part of totalfilm.com, I hope it is okay that I've reinserted the EL to totalfilm.tumblr.com.
I've also added the Editor's name and made some additional changes to the intro copy, the Features copy and the Key Sections copy. I have asked the Editor if the line "It is one of the largest circulation English-speaking film magazines in the world" can be attributed to a published source.
LizHawkins (talk) 10:02, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  EL to totalfilm.tumblr.com 

message: The Total Film page has a flag at the top, stating:
This article needs additional citations for verification.
Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (February 2011) 
I have removed the following statement:
It is one of the largest circulation English-speaking film magazines in the world.
I was waiting for a source, but none has been provided, so I have removed the statement for the time being.
I can find no other examples of statements that require citations, so I hope the flag will now be removed.
LizHawkins (talk) 16:16, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Additional citations for verification" 

message: The Total Film page details the various sections of the magazine and the website. 
These are statements of fact, with the section headings lifted directly from the magazine and website. 
The only statement of opinion, which required a citation, has now been removed: It is one of the largest circulation English-speaking film magazines in the world.
The information on the Total Film page, ie Intro, Regular Features, etc., is very similar to that on other film magazine pages, ie Premiere and Empire. It is unclear why the Total Film page has been tagged as a potential advert and marked for speedy deletion...
LizHawkins (talk) 16:49, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has not been tagged for speedy deletion, so please refrain from adding the  tag.  Thanks! Logan Talk Contributions 00:16, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the "This article is written like an advertisement" tag, since the statement that required a citation has been removed and the rest of the copy details the various sections of the magazine and website. If it is still considered that this article reads like an ad, can someone give me some tips as to what needs changing? Many thanks. LizHawkins (talk) 08:49, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written Like An Ad 

message: How do I add (magazine) to the Total Film header at the top of the page, as per other magazine articles? Many thanks. LizHawkins (talk) 08:56, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total Film (magazine)
Talk:Screen Australia

message: Hi there, 
As part of a university assignment at Sydney University, I have updated this page with approximately 2000 words of information about the relevant topic. I am planning to continue editing over the next week. If anyone has any suggestions in improving what I have added/adding more information, please let me know as I'd love to work on it further! Dragonfly27356 (talk) 01:56, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited this page 4 November 2020
Talk:Pom

message: Amazing. There seems to no reference at all on the net, let alone Wipedia, to Pom, the ration-free dried powdered potato we used to get during the war217.43.217.180 (talk) 16:54, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Rectified with this edit. Trafford09 (talk) 19:02, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dried mashed potato
Talk:DOF

message: Depth of field, in photography a measurement of depth of acceptable sharpness in the object space, or subject space Sounds confusing. Aren't object space and subject space the same in that context?--87.162.28.138 (talk) 07:00, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

message: https://www.shop-nachtmann.de/kollektionen/nachtmann/classix/nachtmann-classix-dof-4er-set-gemischtes-dekore.html  --  92.117.170.104 (talk) 18:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  DOF glass - what does that mean?
Talk:Das

message: Why is "Dear Air Space" the radiohead blog and inner space between glazing - listed under "medicine" ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.207.31.20 (talk) 07:52, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Das 2800:98:1212:A576:8080:9737:FFF9:7A5F (talk) 21:17, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Talk:NOP

message: -- NOOP --
What about the new google language Noop? Any syntax examples?
See:
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Application-Development/Google-Delivers-New-Javalike-Language-Noop-473613/?kc=rss
80.108.103.172 (talk) 12:29, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Daniel

message: We've got the views  and clickstreams for December, 90% of which is post-move so the percentages will be off (and the new trend isn't established yet), and the identified outgoing ratios are:
; December (7891)
* Daniel_(given_name) link 1431 (~18%)
* Daniel_(biblical_figure) link 888 (~11%)
* Book_of_Daniel link 270 (~3.4%)
* List_of_people_named_Daniel link 260 (~3.3%)
* Daniel_(Elton_John_song) link 111 (~1.4%)
* Daniel_(2019_film) link 93 (~1.1%)
* Daniel_(1983_film) link 55
* Daniel_(angel) link 49
* List_of_people_with_surname_Daniel link 44
* Main_Page other 17
* Daniel_(restaurant) link 16
* Daniel_(Old_English_poem) link 16
* Chileab link 16
* List_of_storms_named_Daniel link 13
* Daniel_Padilla other 11
* Danel other 11
--Joy (talk) 19:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  post-move
Talk:Knowledge (disambiguation)

message: Per disambig rules, dab pages are for items that can be called with the same name. Maybe my English is poor, but I dont believe that any item calld "know" may also be called "knowledge. - Altenmann >talk 19:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That is the correct purpose of a disambiguation page, but not every DAB page is for one single term. If other similar terms also share a primary topic, as in this case, then those terms can also be disambiguated on the same page. -- Fyrael (talk) 20:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: "Knowledge" is not the same topic as "know". YOu cannot possibly say: "Knowledge may also refer to" ... ""Know" (Mary J. Blige song)", which is plain false. - Altenmann >talk 20:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That's just an argument for the lead to say "Knowledge, know, or known may also refer to:", which you're right we should do. I will endeavor to find some of the other similar DAB pages that do this, so you don't think this is a concept I just created. It's quite a standard practice for near terms that would be too small for their own DAB page. -- Fyrael (talk) 20:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Causality (disambiguation) is one such, where it includes many entries ambiguous with "causal". On that page, like this case, the words are just different parts of speech. "Causality" is just the noun form of the adjective "causal", so they very much are the same topic. "Knowledge" is the noun form of the verb "know". It's true that we don't always do this, but I think the only times we don't are when each term has easily enough entries to warrant separate pages. I'd argue this isn't a case like that. -- Fyrael (talk) 20:26, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of the items called "Know"
Talk:Tag

message: To explain why I removed this:
From my perspective, the target content looks like something quite obscure that someone wrote in 2008 as a goal for this WikiProject and is not being actively discussed or worked-on. If someone did want to read about this "proposal", it seems unlikely that they would try to get there by typing "tag" into the Wikipedia search engine (because they would presumably already be familiar with the topic and know where to find the discussion, and also because they would probably not be such a newbie that they would look for it, in article space, with that single vague search term). It just seemed odd to me that the disambiguation page should eternally bear this hatnote linking to one person's suggestion from several years ago. But it's entirely possible my view of the situation is wrong; I'm not familiar with the subject or with the WikiProject. Theoldsparkle (talk) 20:24, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-ref 

message: Could mention "3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase I (E. coli TAG) that catalyzes the excision of 3-methyl adducts of adenosine and guanosine from DNA" - Rod57 (talk) 23:35, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: TAG enzyme
Talk:The Black Swan (Story of the Year album)

message: I don't believe that people should have the genre put up yet since noone has heard the album and cant decide or debate the genre(s) and i highly doubt that this will be alternative rock, since they are a heavy band, and probaly verge on being heavier and faster than rock at times, not slower and quieter.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thrice34 (talk • contribs) 15:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 

message: i dont think alternative metal is a valid genre here if it is metal than it is normal metal not alternative  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.65.47 (talk) 09:14, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  alternative metal 

message: for that user who asked where to find them:
japan.
if you're not in japan, try youtube or torrents. otherwise, you;re out of luck.
Jailerdaemon (talk) 02:03, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  japanese bonus tracks 

message: Why bother making a page for each single if they're just going to be crappy stubs? At least put some effort in to contribute, stead of just leaving it with the bare minimum info after creating it. kiac (talk) 12:40, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singles
Talk:Madhu (disambiguation)

message: I am recommending that this page be moved to Madhu (disambiguation) and that Madhura be moved to Madhu instead. This is because all instances of Madhu derive from that single Vedic Sanskrit root usage. Madhur/Madhura itself is a form of that word. I don't want sudden jolts here, so am leaving this for discussion for a few days. --Hunnjazal (talk) 15:43, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move notice
File talk:Colbertevolution.jpg

message: "This image is of a book cover, and the copyright for it is most likely owned either by the artist who created the cover or the publisher of the book. It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of book covers
to illustrate an article discussing the book in question 
on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, 
qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Other use of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, might be copyright infringement"
This rationale, which is used in the uploading of many other various book covers including those for the Harry Potter series, seems justified. --Salvorix (talk) 03:51, 30 January 2008 (UTC)