Talk:Hurricane Gustav (2002)

message: Too little info. Nearly all of the information is in the seasonal article, and this storm is not nearly notable enough. Hurricanehink 03:21, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Strongly agreed. In fact, I may merge it right now... -- Hurricane Eric - my dropsonde - archive 04:41, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: More info is needed. This site has some useful information, including the damage total ($409,000) and some indirect deaths. Hurricanehink (talk) 23:57, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It says the page cannot be found. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 19:50, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yea, that site went down back in June. You can use the direct data from the National Climatic Data Center, though. Hurricanehink (talk) 19:54, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Todo  

message: Which is the actual Category of Gustav. In the 2002 atlantic hurricane season page says that it was 1 but here says it was 2. Which  page is right? This, the 2002 one or neither? juan andrés 00:12, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: When in doubt, check the NHC page. In this case the max windspeed was 85 kts (=100 mph, Cat 2), though this wasn't at the time of minimum pressure hence the confusion. It's fixed.--Nilfanion (talk) 09:38, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Category?

message: :1. Well written? Pass
:2. Factually accurate? Pass
:3. Broad in coverage? Pass
:4. Neutral point of view? Pass
:5. Article stability? Pass
:6. Images? Pass
Out of curiosity, was there any other response to the incident other than the cordonning off of some area in New York, if so, then it would be a nice addition to the article. As for the article, it passes all of GA's criteria and is an informative chunk of well-organized text. Lincher 02:23, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, there really isn't anything else. Too bad, though. --Coredesat 19:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GA passed

message: Was there any reason given for the early naming? It hasnt happened before or since.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.104.32.27 (talk) 18:09, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: A hurricane active in North Carolina how can it hit Nova Scotia or Newfoundland?
Have tropical storms ever survived thus far north? I cannot imagine.
Nuremberg / BAVARIA -  Ángel García 131.188.3.21 (talk) 10:10, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atlantic Canada  -  really ? ? 

message: Ref #13 ("NCDC-MA") was the first one I noticed, but I now suspect perhaps all the NCDC "ShowEvent" references have wonky archive links. They all seem (for me at least) to load random-looking "Event Record Details", and when I browse the wayback archive dates event 475001 here for instance, it appears the archived pages themselves are random - compare the Mar 2007 and Sep 2008 archived versions. Am I the only one seeing this? Franamax (talk) 22:44, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird wayback links 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Hurricane Gustav (2002). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111011042947/http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/A6.html to http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/A6.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent%7EShowEvent%7E475830
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent%7EShowEvent%7E475831
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071113033900/http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WEATHER/09/12/gustav/index.html to http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WEATHER/09/12/gustav/index.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent%7EShowEvent%7E474063
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent%7EShowEvent%7E475001
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent%7EShowEvent%7E467548
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent%7EShowEvent%7E474999
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080915093826/http://archive.salon.com/news/sports/col/olbermann/2002/09/12/wind/index.html to http://archive.salon.com/news/sports/col/olbermann/2002/09/12/wind/index.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20020912/hurricane_gustav_020912/TopStories/story/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:05, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: *Numerous grammatical issues
*Met is not entirely comprehensive (ex: does not discuss peak structure of the storm period)
*This article is using the NCDC as a crutch, largely comprising a single source other than a few minor points.
:* Surely some news agency somewhere covered the impact. It doesn't look like much effort was taken to find impact back in 2006. It seems quite implausible that virtually no news agencies would cover a hurricane making landfall.
*Academic literature is not discussed in this article.
Noticing this article for FAR per the above. NoahTalk 05:25, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Listed at WP:FARGIVEN, CCI check not yet done. (I will do a CCI check if it comes to FAR before the CCI peeps get to it.) SandyGeorgia (Talk)  15:31, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:URFA/2020]]