Talk:Anilingus/Archive 1

message: :The text below was originally at Rimming before a few different page moves/merges.
What about gastro-intestinal parasites? Is it more likely to get some sort of worm this way than by eating raw pig? Does washing help? Also, shouldn't the encyclopedia title be "analingus" and "rimming" be transformed into a redirect page? I thought "rimming" was slang. Loisel 23:15 Jan 29, 2003 (UTC)
:Much agreed.  Analingus is the more accurate term, and the most obvious term. Jeff Anonymous 05:38, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Parasites

message: I'm removing the links to coprophagia and scat fetishism because I think they're misleading. We don't have urine fetishism as a "see also" link from oral sex, though that would be analogous. -Montréalais
:I'm not sure that's an inherantly accurate comparison. Both genitals are intended as sexual areas and have muscles which stop the flow of urine. Being a liquid, it's also a lot easier to clean and doesn't 'stick around' like the contents of the topic in question. Which, in accessing the anus, is releasing the muscles we have which stops access to the lower intestines. Perhaps a distinction could be made for your cause in 'rimming' the outside, and the insertion of the tongue which is distinctly more related to corprophagia. Tyciol 19:34, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fetishism

message: The explicit picture of the two homosexuals having sex is not necessary and I am removing it!! -Unknown
:Possibly, possibly not. This is really something that can occur M>M M>F F>M F>F. Choosing one sort over others would inevitably offend someone, so it would be best to include none, or a basic diagram where the gender of neither participant is discernable. Tyciol 19:34, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture removal and choosing

message: I was reading an article Avert about how easily HIV is transmitted via oral sex (the conclusion been "not very"). Although the article obviously isn't about anal-oral contact there is probably a correlation. I think mentioning HIV as one of the specific risks is therefore misleading... GalaxiaGuy 20:14, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: HIV is really transmitted on anal-oral contact. Just ask your doctor and he/she will confirm. The information on the article is not misleading. --Alberto msr 20:47, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: HIV/AIDS risk

message: Anon editor, please don't delete huge chunks of text without giving reason on the talk page. Also, can you source the assertion that the mouth presents more pathogens than the anus and rectum? 02:28, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletions

message: This whole section reads like original research. -216.165.33.63 04:42, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Prevalence in pornographic videos

message: The search term "Hot Carl" redirects to this subject. A Hot Carl does not involve anal-oral contact and should be its own article. -Unknown
I noticed someone reverted back the discussion about Hot Carl vs. Hot Karl, but it was quickly replaced. I wanted to specify my objections to it being redirected to Anal-Oral contact:
#A Hot Carl does not involve anal-oral contact, only fecal-oral contact, and can be done with or without a barrier.
#I do not believe this qualifies as sexual slang. There is no proper term for this in sexual descriptions. A blowjob is slang for fellatio, but there is nothing describing Hot Carl.
#I also point out that a Hot Carl is not Coprophagia, because ingestion of fecal matter is optional. Also, a Hot Carl is sexual in nature, Coprophagia is not.
Thoughts? -DigitalPimpette
:Agreed. I'm no expert on Hot K/Carl, but I'm sure it shouldn't redirect here, and even if it does, it needs a mention of WHY it redirects here. Gspawn 20:49, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hot Carl

message: Man, why is it called salad tossing? I've thought about it,and I can't figure it out. 66.41.66.213 22:40, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a prison thing. Lower inmates are forced to lick the assholes of the leading inmates, but they put salad dressing on it to hide the taste. Hence, tossing the salad.Janviermichelle 09:15, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Salad tossing?

message: The Templar image looks prett strange. What is your source for thinking it represents anilingus? If a casual observer is confused, and not sure what it represents, should it be the lead image? Atom 16:50, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New images

message: To rimming. 
:Oppose - the proposed move is to a name that sounds fairly unscientific and unprofessional. -Patstuarttalk|edits
:Oppose for the reasons Patstuart mentioned. If we change the name at all, I'd prefer the more encyclopedic term "anilingus". HalJor 21:03, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment.  As stated above, I'm happy with either this name or rimming, but  really don't like "anilingus". Besides my other objections, it clearly fails to be "what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize." (from WP:NAME) --Strait 21:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Support move to rimming, this term has currency beyond practitioners partly thanks to Red Dwarf's antihero Arnold Rimmer (although the show's creators deny they had this in mind). Anilingus is a neologism, and the idea of it sounding professional astounds even me... the things some people do for a buck... (;-> Andrewa 02:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Anilingus is hardly a neologism.  Dictionary.com gives an origin of 1945-1950 (citing Random House) and cites four other dictionaries.  This doesn't seem to fit the definition of neologism: "Neologisms are words and terms that have recently been coined, generally do not appear in any dictionary, but may be used widely or within certain communities." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HalJor (talk • contribs) 05:44, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm, I'll take your word for it regarding dictionary.com although it would be helpful if you'd give the URL to save us all searching for it. But I think anilingus does meet the definition of neologism you quote. I suppose it depends what you take recently and generally to mean. Andrewa 06:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Dictionary.com, for your reference:  HalJor 17:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That link times out when I try it. Andrewa 08:35, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Support moving it to anilingus.  Wikipedia in all other languages call it by the Latin name anilingus and anal-oral contact comes across as quite unarticulate.- Gilliam 00:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that the name of the page in other languages is completely irrelevant.  Common usage in English is not tied to common usage in other languages. --Strait 00:52, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move: after posting on [[W:Requested moves]]

message: Is the "G" in anilingus pronounced as the "G" in "goat" or the "G" in "germ"?
:Assuming anyone ever actually says it out loud, I would think it would be as in "goat", in analogy to cunnilingus. --Strait
::Agreed, however it's pronounced in that. Any latin grammaticists here? Tyciol 19:34, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In Latin, as far as I know, the "g" is only pronounced as it is in "germ" before an "e" or "i".  Before an "a", "o", or "u", it would be pronounced as it is in "goat".--Lesouris (talk) 03:33, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronounciation

message: Is it me, or are movies featuring this more than they used to? It seems like I can't watch a porn (it doesn't matter what kind) and they throw this analingus stuff in. It's not my cup of tea, and I think it ruins the movie every time. Maybe it's just me, but it seems like all kinds of fringe fetish stuff (e.g., spitting, anal followed by fellatio, etc.) is getting put into supposedly bread-and-butter porns these days.--Abs Like Jesus 15:36, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Surge in popularity?

message: I've added this to this article, and cited two sources: an article on pornography and prostitution by the American academic Robert Jensen, and an article from AVN, a pornography industry trade magazine, which I believe can be treated as a reliable source in this context. -- Karada 11:03, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Indirect anal-oral contact in pornography

message: Ass to mouth recently failed an AfD, and was replaced by a redirect to this page.  I feel that Anal sex is a more appropriate page for the redirect, if the subject doesn't deserve its own article, and have changed things accordingly. Tevildo 00:12, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. HalJor 00:58, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A2M redirect

message: In line with autofellatio and autocunnilingus, while I don't think the idea is popular enough to warrant its own article, and obviously more difficult than either of the two previously mentioned feats, the latter of which is still awaiting proof of completion. Even so, perhaps it would warrant a mention in the article? In a metaphorical sense, such as kundalini imagery, the anus holds as much significance to the root chakra as the sexual organs do, and is much closer to the tailbone (bottom/base of spine). It is also more related to the food cycle than the sexual organs which merely release urine to regulate the blood through the kidneys. Also, perhaps tubgirl deserves mention, lol. Tyciol 19:38, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Auto-?

message: http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A22098-2004Mar24
Acct4 15:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benefit?!?  Colonic flora recolonization 

message: The reference talks about the health risks of oral sex in general, not anal-oral contact, so the article should be corrected. Mstuomel 22:40, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Health risks