Talk:Soviet occupation of Romania

message: Where do we put figures of...
420,000 deported in 1941
160,000 deported in 1945-1952
180,000 prisoners of war unrepatriated from the Soviet Union? Seems a large omission... PētersV 02:25, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is something about that in Deportation of Romanians in the Soviet Union, Romanian POW in the Soviet Union, and Flight and expulsion of Germans from Romania during and after World War II.  But all this information (though a good start), could be analyzed more in-depth, and also be better organized and linked together...  Turgidson 03:08, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deportations 

message: Among others, again, "Soviet occupation forces in Romania [allowed for] unlimited interference in Romanian political life." Verona (Military Occupation and Diplomacy: Soviet Troops in Romania, 1944-1958), p. 31. -- Deleted yet again. Let's take this as an example. Please explain how this source is misrepresented.
::The quote says nothing about the period 1947-1958 being an ocupation, while the title is too ambiguos to be used as a ref (i.e. it doesn't explicitely say the occupation ended in 1958, it can very well imply that the presence of Soviet troops was a combination of Occupation (1944-1947) and Diplomacy (1947-1958)).Anonimu (talk) 22:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The post occupation status of the Soviet troops on Romanian soil was provided by the treaty. When Allieds (represented mainly by Soviets) ceassed to have any control on Romania's internal matters (i.e. when the Allied Comission dissolved), Romania became a sovereign, non-occupied country.Anonimu (talk) 22:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A lot of Romanians consider that if you don't have a candle next to you when you die, you come back and haunt you relatives. Plain and simple. Should we write this as a fact?22:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've indicated numerous times why they are misrepresented, but you seem to have a mental block that prevents you from seeing my explanations. BTW, judging by the fact you make a new header of each of my comment, i'll have to publish a book of Maxims and thoughtsAnonimu (talk) 22:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Actually, it's just to split these discussions so that my browser doesn't croak from the size while editing. :-) PētersV (talk) 22:35, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speaking of deletions 

message: I'm sorry, but I find the latest edits by A CT Romania and Anonimu din Constanta not in keeping with what I would regard as Bonaparte's position. Of course I could be grossly mistaken and thinking of some other Bonaparte. What's the best way to have the IP's checked? PētersV (talk) 02:06, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bonaparte? 

message: I have added the POV tag to this article, and have seen discussions on this talk page, but as far as I can see, the POV is somehow justified by this in the notes:
The term "occupation" is widely used by Western and post-Revolutionary Romanian historians.
Just how is the opinion of those evil red commies and the pre-revolutionary Romanian historians  present in this article? Or is this just another totally WP:NPOV anti-Soviet (and by default it seems anti-Russian) articles which are written from the POV of editors, and not from a balanced perspective from both side of the equation? A new title and much of the lead needs to be changed to balance out the POV. --Россавиа Диалог 13:19, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry, I don't see any references to evil red commies et al. The occupation is what it is, there's no controversy as in the Baltics where Russia argues the Soviets were "invited" in. There was an official occupation by the Allies with the Soviet Union as sole executor, followed by massive reparations which drained Romania, followed by illegal militarization of Romania (in violation of treaty), not to mention the annexation of Bessarabia. If you feel the article is not NPOV, please come up with something more substantive than deriding this is as yet another "evil red commies" article. —PētersV (talk) 00:40, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Totally POV total and introduction 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Orphanages in Sibiu in 1952? Trying find my brother 98.145.91.33 (talk) 23:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphanages in Sibiu in 1952?