Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/The Game (game) (6th nomination)

message: Links will go to diffs of what they said. Italics is "weak" and bold is "strong"
Opinions
Keep         	Delete           	Speedy Delete
Liface       	KnightLago       	Malevious
Nardman      	Bwithh           	
Clyde        	Danny Lilithborne	
Andy Saunders	Dennisthe2       	
RockMFR      	Shimeru          	
Telso        	Sethie           	
Kizor        	Just H           	
Mailer Diablo	Proto            	
Zachlipton   	Roisterer        	
Rdore        	Licatsii         	
             	Serpent's Choice 	
             	Richmeister      	
             	AgentPeppermint  	
             	Robdurbar        	
             	Bkkbrad          	
             	dposse           	
             	Gnangarra        	
             	Zoe              	
             	WarpstarRider    	
             	W. Flake         	
             	Anomo            	
             	Robertissimo     	
             	BigNate37        	
             	67.117.130.181   	
Uh... the above table is not accurate or up to date e.g. Mailer Diablo did not !vote in this afd  - he closed a previous afd Bwithh 15:08, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I stopped bothering updating it after I continued to get my head bit off for trying to assist. No good deed goes unpunished I suppose. Just H 21:02, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

message: AfD is note a vote, it is a discussion of whether the article merits inclusion. If problems with core content policies exist, no amount of keep votes will overcome that. Substantial argument against the pro-deletion arguements rooted in policy would be required. Please do not polarise the issue by making it a for-or-against matter—anymore than it already is, anyways. BigNate37(T) 03:05, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never said it was a vote. I'm just doing this to clean up the mess that discussion had become. Just H 03:23, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't need to be cleaned up—taking away the discussion and leaving only a tally defeats the purpose of the discussion. If the keep arguments are more sound than the delete arguments, it shouldn't matter if they were outnumbered ten to one. At best, the tally doesn't affect the outcome, but in the worst case it could bring about the wrong decision. And yes, I concede that you're not organising a vote and I do believe that you're trying to do a good thing. I simply don't agree with the act of compiling a tally. BigNate37(T) 04:50, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We'll have to agree to disagree then. If numbers don't mean anything, people wouldn't say Keep or Delete before their comments. Quantitative and Qualitatitve input is equally important. I ask you not to discount the Quantitative because of some hot heads. Just H 06:32, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: AfD instructions on How to discuss an AfD/Wikietiquette The debate is not a vote; please make recommendations on the course of action to be taken, sustained by arguments. Keep, Delete, Merge etc are the recommendation for the course of action, these recommendations need to sustained with an argument hence the requirement for text to explain an editors position, and why simple unspported recommendation should be ignored. Gnangarra 10:09, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't that what I just said? Just H 21:02, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a vote 

message: I was going to add links to their comments, but I may add their comments in small text or something. I'll figure it out somehow. Just H 06:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: P.S