Talk:Fiore dei Liberi

message: I have a copy of "Teaching & Interpreting Historical Swordsmanship", edited by Brian R. Price, my teacher of the art. I haven't dove into it yet, but do you think it would help any of the articles relating to this topic? Colonel Marksman 18:56, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A book - reference?

message: "Knights of the Wild Rose - Fiore de Liberi's Flos Duellatorum" is a dead link.  I'll remove it in a week or so unless anyone can find it's new home and fix it. The Knights of the Wild Rose also appear to be dead, as they can not be found anywhere online anymore.
Also,what is up with Schola Gladitoria and Schola St. George trying to outdo each other's external links... bold... "The Mighty"   ....I'm afraid if this silliness doesn't end that all links to training wil be tossed.  Please folks.... just list them without any flourish. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Master at Arms (talk • contribs) 23:51, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken link and WTF with the "schools"

message: Would anyone be terribly upset if we lost the Sette Spada section altogether? It really doesn't seem to fit into the article anymore. Alternately, how should it be altered to be fit for the article again? Michael Chidester 100419OCT2008 (UTC)
Here's the text of the section. I might put it back if I can make it useful. Michael Chidester (talk) 15:00, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sette Spade?

message: The list of external links needs looking at and extreme pruning. The list of translations is okay, I suppose (long-term, it might be better to sunder the article into Fiore dei Liberi and Fior di Battaglia, but that's a different discussion). It looks sloppy to me, but maybe that's just because there's no uniform description style. I'll look at that and fix it if I can.
The list of articles is redundant, as they're all listed in the references section, where they belong.
The list of schools, while well-intentioned I'm sure, is completely out of place--it smacks of pure self-promotion. There's an argument to be made that these are educational resources or relevant to the article. Curious, I looked up two other influential masters--Johannes Liechtenauer and Bruce Lee--and found that neither one includes even a partial list of the (many) contemporary schools based on their teachings. I've interacted with many of the listed groups and have nothing against any of them, but if they're big enough to be worth a mention on Wikipedia they should get their own articles. Linking them here is inappropriate. 
I'm going to can both of the latter sections next week unless someone offers a good defense of them. Michael Chidester (talk) 01:07, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. Michael Chidester (talk) 18:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fiore dei Liberi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060920014002/http://www.getty.edu/art/gettyguide/artObjectDetails?artobj=1706 to http://www.getty.edu/art/gettyguide/artObjectDetails?artobj=1706
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:31, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Fiore dei Liberi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006082642/http://www.condottieridiventura.it/index.php/lettera-v/2660-piero-del-verde to http://www.condottieridiventura.it/index.php/lettera-v/2660-piero-del-verde
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006112227/http://www.condottieridiventura.it/index.php/lettera-m/1450-galeazzo-da-mantova to http://www.condottieridiventura.it/index.php/lettera-m/1450-galeazzo-da-mantova
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130816031659/http://www.condottieridiventura.it/index.php/lettera-b/630-lancillotto-beccaria to http://www.condottieridiventura.it/index.php/lettera-b/630-lancillotto-beccaria
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006082642/http://www.condottieridiventura.it/index.php/lettera-v/2660-piero-del-verde to http://www.condottieridiventura.it/index.php/lettera-v/2660-piero-del-verde
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140910105305/http://www.condottieridiventura.it/index.php/lettera-c/971-pietro-della-corona to http://www.condottieridiventura.it/index.php/lettera-c/971-pietro-della-corona
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:33, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I feel like the current image is only used because HEMA sites have a weird obsession with face-shots of historic manuscripts. Whenever Wikipedia tends to have an image for a historic figure, it's a full body shot. Here's a pretty high-res crop of an image generally assumed to be of Fiore himself, and here's another crop of the image to be more of a three-quarters ratio.--Amelia-the-comic-geek (talk) 14:40, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no reason to assume that that's Fiore. It could easily be Niccol d'Este or some random dude. ~ Michael Chidester (Contact) 16:20, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

text: (I agree the current picture is probably bullshit, tho.) ~ Michael Chidester (Contact) 18:47, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image used