Talk:Samma (tribe)

message: For the year 2006-07, let us concentrate on upgrading the contents as decided: Wales to upgrade quality of Wiki. Thanks. --Bhadani 03:15, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Let us upgrade

message: This article says Samma is a division of Jamot. Is this correct? If so, is Abro a division of Samma or of Jamot? Aymatth2 (talk) 13:25, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Jamot, Samma, Sammat, Jam 

message: The following list of uncited alleged sources have been removed from the article. If they're of any use then please do reinstate them after reading WP:Citing sources. I've struck through the ones that are definitely not reliable (mostly Raj stuff) or otherwise unsuitable (Flickr, for example).
* Baluchistan - Imperial Gazetteer of India, v. 6, p. 277.
* History of Jamot Tribes
* Kingdom of Sammas by Gulam Mohammad Lakho
* The Chach Nama- English translation by Mirza Kalichbeg Fredunbeg. Delhi Reprint, 1979.
* Tarikh-i Hind Wa Sindh, Arabic (تاريخ الهند والسند )
* The tomb of Jam Nido at Makli Hills, Thatta, Sindh, Pakistan - March 2008
* Makli Necropolis
* Makli graveyard - telling tales of centuries
* A new archaeological discovery in Lasbela
* [Jam Nizam-ud-din's] Tomb at Thatta</s?
* Call to save crumbling Samma heritage
* Islamic culture - Page 429, by Islamic Culture Board
* A History of India Under the Two First Sovereigns of the House of Taimur, by William Erskine
* The History and culture of the Indian people - Page 224, by Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Bhāratīya Itihāsa Samiti
* The Ṭabaqāt-i-Akbarī of K̲h̲wājah Nizāmuddīn Ahmad: a history of India, by Niẓām al-Dīn Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad Muqīm, Brajendranath De, Baini Prashad
* Bibliotheca Indica - Page 778, by Royal Asiatic Society of Bengal, Asiatic Society (Calcutta, India)
* Searchlights on Baloches and Balochistan, by Mir Khuda Bakhsh Marri
* The Delhi Sultanate, by Kanaiyalal Maneklal Munshi, Ramesh Chandra Majumdar, Asoke Kumar Majumdar, A. D. Pusalker
* Babar, by Radhey Shyam
* Indo-Arab relations: an English rendering of Arab oʾ Hind ke taʾllugat, by Syed Sulaiman Nadvi, Sayyid Sulaimān Nadvī, M. Salahuddin
* The History of India, as Told by Its Own Historians: The Muhammadan Period, by Henry Miers Elliot, John Dowson
* Muslim Kingship in India, by Nagendra Kumar Singh
* The Indus Delta country: a memoir, chiefly on its ancient geography and history, by Malcolm Robert Haig
* The Samma kingdom of Sindh: historical studies, by G̲h̲ulāmu Muḥammadu Lākho, University of Sind. Institute of Sindology
* Imperial Gazetteer of India, by William Wilson Hunter, James Sutherland Cotton, Richard Burn, William Stevenson Meyer, Great Britain. India Office, John George Bartholomew
- Sitush (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citing sources 

message: Samma are the Sindhi Rajput clan of Rajput, settled in Sindh,Balochistan, Rajasthan India. They established the Samma Dynasty, Under Jam Nizamudin. there are information on Google books regarding Samma tribe. kindly insert information for this article.--Jogi don (talk) 11:24, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I am thinking that this article should be redirected to the dynasty article. I am struggling to find any decent sources that even mention this community as a modern-day tribe - everything seems to relate to 700 years ago etc. The problem is that ancient dynasties do not always in fact connect to modern tribes, except in the mythology of the modern tribes themselves. A classic is the Yadav vs Yadava thing; another is the Vanniyar, whose convoluted myth of origin connects them to the Kodava even though all academic sources say otherwise. - Sitush (talk) 11:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kindly insert the information in this article Samma tribe. 

message: Accroding to [Chachnama]] there was a powerful king name Agham Lohana. there were many subtiribe of Lohanas like Lakha, Samma, Sahata, Kotak, Channa(Chhanna) and many more mentioned in the Chachnama.] In chachnama Wazír Siyákar replied in the
presence of Mókah Basáyeh: “In the reign of Rái Chach the Lúhánahs, that is, the
Lákháhs and the Sammáhs. Also historians Chintaman Vinayak Vaidya confirmed that the Sammas were Lohanas and originally kshatriya.]. That's why the Sammas were belong to Lohanas and after arab they established their kingdom.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.229.29.74 (talk) 06:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samma are originally [[Lohana]], an ancient [[kshatriya]] 

message: Samma are originally Muslim Sandhi Muslim (talk) 06:43, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samma is Not MuslimJat 

message: The references added in the lead written by Sigrid-Hellbusch seems to have a very bad review here [] on page 938 first-two para, and it doesn't look like in the reference writer is saying the lines that has been added here, most writers seems to have taken a very ambiguous stance. Akalanka820 (talk) 09:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead reference 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:09, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Admin @Daniel Case, Please remove unsourced claims. The Sammas are also said to be the descendants of Samba son of Shree Krishna. it is factually wrong no historical inscription/book/ records says any connection between Muslim sammas and Hindu god Krishna. 2409:4085:8E8D:162F:0:0:8809:2D11 (talk) 09:34, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Source here it's mentioned Samma's are descended from Shri Krishna's son Samba Rajanyas (talk) 09:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This source is not reliable. 2409:4085:8E8D:162F:0:0:8809:2D11 (talk) 10:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: it doesn't fall under any unreliable category. Stop POV pushing  Rajanyas (talk) 11:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 17 April 2024