Talk:Miranda NG

message: Is it just me or the tone of this article a bit biased (in favor)? — flamingspinach | (talk) 05:38, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: I dispute the history involving Rainwater & Egodust. I happen to know that Rainwater is still involved with the project and that Egodust did not leave for the stated reasons as I am also involved with project & I've talked with both of the said developers. Does anyone know where the history came from? Forum gossip? Internet Trickery? Aaron Myles Landwehr 09:57, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably a rumour induced by Bongwater's absolutely *horrible* attitude when it comes to dealing with Miranda users (see the forums for regular jerkisms), and refusing to accept change within the client (a.k.a. nerd fights).  The "core decisions" made in Miranda are kept **completely** out of the public's eye, for reasons completely unknown.  Who decides what is never discussed or disclosed; end-users are left wondering who decided to change things for the worse... yadda yadda. -- Semi-anonymous
The next build is going to be named 0.5 - there is already a build of that version - v0.5.57 - the build before that was still 0.4.3, but now it's named 0.5
--87.248.181.67 20:04, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Version 0.4.x History is Incorrect 

message: I updated the release history to include 0.5.x and removed the paragraph concerning rainwater leaving, as he announced the new release on the miranda website (http://www.miranda-im.org/2006/07/28/miranda-im-v05-released/).
However, I don't know what the future plans are, so I left that as is. It needs to be updated. Earthsound 20:43, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  some cleanup and further need for revision 

message: How do I change the font size in Miranda IM's chat window? -- Toytoy 23:48, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change the font 

message: Since Miranda IM is published under the GNU GPL, the description of the image posted in this article is wrong ("This is a screenshot of copyrighted computer software..."). -- 84.63.109.55 21:40, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The GNU GPL doesn't prevent a piece of software from being copyrighted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.226.196.180 (talk) 02:52, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenshot 

message: Miranda-IM has never had linux support!
The supported OS are: Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows Me, Windows NT 4, Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows Vista (http://www.miranda-im.org/about/). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.200.120.169 (talk) 18:27, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linux 

message: "Miranda IM" by itself, according to miranda-im.org is currently Windows-only.  One of its main features is ease of installation.  The Linux build announced on the forum is not by any means a package, for any version of Linux. For this reason I nominate keeping Category:Windows-only instant messaging clients,  until there's a Linux package available. --Lexein 14:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windows-only vs Linux version

message: :*There appears to be a date conflict about the release of 0.3 (see comment in article).  Or was that supposed to be 0.2?
:*What's contact to contact and messaging protocols -opposed to IM protocols. A couple of syntactic sugar words about these would help. --Lexein 18:27, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarifications needed - please help 

message: Why are the screenshots in different languages? Could someone perhaps upload English language screenshots?
The freddinator (talk) 22:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenshots 

message: Maybe some words about the name and the logo? --Lastwebpage (talk) 10:57, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historic 

message: I noticed the needs-better-citations tag, so here's a 
bunch of books discussing Miranda IM. 
http://books.google.com/books?q=%22miranda+im%22+instant 
-- Lexein (talk) 10:59, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation sources 

message: I've moved Future Plans out of the main article.  I couldn't locate a more up to date Roadmap or Future page or blog.  Help?
:==Future plans== Plans for 0.8 include a core notifications framework, better compatibility with Windows Vista, a new plugin loader, return of the console and improvement of the user friendliness There are no plans for an official Linux edition,Starting a Miranda for Linux project Forum; Miranda-im.org, 3 May 2007. but the Windows version was reported to work well in Linux with the Wine compatibility layer.Miranda FAQ miranda-im.org
--Lexein (talk) 16:24, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future Plans sidelined 

message: Miranda 0.9x is a part of this book of poetry:
*"Le aziende in-visibili: romanzo a colori". Marco Minghetti. Libri Scheiwiller, 2008. pg. 115.
--Lexein (talk) 14:56, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd source 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Miranda IM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080116005459/http://forums.miranda-im.org/showthread.php?p=65666 to http://forums.miranda-im.org/showthread.php?p=65666
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:03, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The Architecture section mentions Miranda IM (the successor) all the time. While Miranda IM is the predecessor of Miranda NG, unless explicitely comparing the two in terms of architecture, I do not see the point in not replacing the IM with NG here. Rbaleksandar (talk) 06:16, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Architecture section reads like Miranda IM not Miranda NG 

message: "Richard "cyreve" Hughes" apparently disappeared. I cannot find this on the net right now, and the source given ends nowhere. 89.8.3.169 (talk) 13:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  source 9 is down