lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of TAROM destinations

message: This article needs to tell more about the airline than a directory of where it flies.  Seep WP:NOT  WVhybrid 15:43, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagged 

message: I would have to disagree. First off, Tarom doesn't serve Gatwick, only Heathrow. And from Cluj? No way! It must be incorrect. Basketball110 17:03, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cluj la Gatwick? 

message: Please delete charter destinations.
These destinations have nothing to do with Tarom and you can not book the destinations on Taroms home page.
The Travel Agencies decide if they keep these destinations, and the travel agencies decide wich company should fly the passengers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.24.65.21 (talk) 15:51, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete please all charters 

message: All codeshare destinations need to be removed from the article, as per Aviation/Style guide.
Thank you,
(Rgvis (talk) 09:29, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Codeshare destinations

message: May I have permission to combine the flying destinations and terminated destinations into one? 73.87.74.115 (talk) 18:08, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:D'espairsRay

message: The following sentence was removed from paragraph 4 (it was sentence 5):
A second press had to be sold the same day, for every potential buyer to be satisfied!
If anyone can interpret this correctly, and change it so that it makes sense, please edit it back in where it was. Theslash 18:39, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Non-sensical Sentence

message: This was never announced and the source was Zero's temporary blog.  Any such announcements would NOT be made through one members blog.  The OHP doesn't even say that.  It was simply said that they would be releasing the new album through Delicious Deli.  Mousou egoist (talk) 03:36, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed statement the band left Sword Records for Delicious Deli
Talk:Hassan Akbar

message: Article needs references, unref tag added. Request left on user talk page.--FloNight 18:52, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs references

message: After doing the reference check, I believe this article is misspelled and should be moved.  It should be Hasan not Hassan. Brianhe 07:58, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved the page and added a redirect. --Lee Hunter 16:01, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Subject misspelled
Talk:Paul Capdevielle

message: I took some of the text directly from Kendall's book (1922, public domain, on my site: the external link given at the bottom of the article). I mention it because the New Orleans Public Library has [http://nutrias.org/~nopl/info/louinfo/admins/capdevielle.htm
a page] where they did much the same, starting with Kendall as the seed, and doing their thing; this Wikipedia article is not a copyvio cribbed from the NOPL site, then: rather, both Wikipedia and NOPL derive from Kendall. Bill 18:59, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of initial seed of this article 
Talk:Lisianthus

message: Lisianthus is the common name and archaic scientific name for Eustoma and is better-known as a flower of the Eustoma genus than an anime character. Should a disambiguation page exist here, as was suggested years ago? -- User:Tiganusi
Lisianthus is substantially more significant as a common flower name, so in my opinion, this page should redirect to the primary page, with a disambiguation notice there to link to a disambiguation page that can list the anime character.  -- Angorian (talk) 10:30, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation?
Talk:Felix Weingartner

message: .... symphonies (being recorded by CPO)
What is CPO??
Gerhard51 19:01, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: cpo (should be lowercase, sorry) is a recording company out of Osnabrück. (I like many of their recordings but have no financial connection with them; still, if the mention is inappropriate it can certainly be removed.)  Schissel-nonLop! 21:07, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  CPO 

message: He seems to have lived into and died in the Nazi era.
Every other conductor of this time seems to have had some major encounter with the Nazi regime.  Not Weingartner?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.119.204.117 (talk) 04:28, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not Weingartner. First he went to Switzerland, then to Austria and when the Nazis came to Vienna, he went to Switzerland again. Your claim that "Every other conductor of this time seems to have had some major encounter with the Nazi regime" is not tenable. Krips and Kleiber, for instance, simply emigrated in time.--14:37, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  1933-42?
Talk:Øystein Djupedal

message: I deleted the following paragraph that was just added to the article:
:The opinions of Mr Djupedal are rather coummunist-leaning, and his first months as Minister has been marked by controversy. Among his most infamous statements, is the one where he publicly declared that Kindergardens should have more responsibility than parents in the up-bringing of Children. Other socialist initiatives from his hand have included banning prayers from all schools, and reversing the previous goverment's tolerance towards private schools.
Although much is true, it is badly written. Feel free to rewrite and return it to the article. --Eddi (Talk) 19:02, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Immature paragraph
Talk:2nd United States Congress

message: *This article is COMPLETE and meets the current standard for this series of articles.
*suggestions for future improvements:
#supplemental Senate & House committees article
#supplemental district maps article
#narrative for major legislation
#narrative for major events
stilltim 21:56, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is there an image of Independence Hall (United States) on this page if the Congress met at Congress Hall while in Philadelphia? Best, epicAdam(talk) 05:11, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Independence Hall 

message: There is a conflict as to when  Thomas Tredwell began his representation of . Please see Talk:Thomas Tredwell#Congressional service dates conflict. —Markles 10:56, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thomas Tredwell 

message: It says that during part of the session there was an anti-administration majority in the intro but is not supported by the text? is something missing or should it be removed? I see no basis to this claim. Stidmatt (talk) 03:06, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Anti-Administration majority? 
Talk:Macarius of Egypt

message: The editor who deleted external links at this article has made similar deletions at many other articles, including links to on-line text of many Early Christian writers. Discussion of this behavior, which would have been routinely reverted as vandalism if it were from an anonymous IP, may be found at Talk:Papias. --Wetman 18:53, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reinstated the link to Schaff-Herzog, should anyone ever want to mention the actual writings of the historical Macarius, to add to the thin pabulum of the current article. The story of Macarius' parents being Abraham and Sarah, etc etc, needs to be sourced: it's too transparently fictional simply to report as history. --Wetman 10:26, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted external links 

message: Macarius' ordination to the priesthood is mentioned twice, once by the bishop at the request of the people of his village, and again, ten years later when he is a hermit in the desert. Please clarify this. Caeruleancentaur (talk) 12:41, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ordained twice? 

message: On the page Theoria#St Macarius of Egypt it is written that St. Maracius believed that theoria is the same as agape, but not very clearly. Therefore I was wondering if anybody who knows about his use of theoria and agape, which are traditionally distinct subjective experiences, might edit that page. makeswell (talk) 20:01, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  expert help please 

message: Why are there no dates on any important events that impacted Macarius of Egypt's life?
Hoss392 (talk) 01:31, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions about Dates 

message: If you search for Pseudo-Macarius on Google, this article is the first hit. In the lead paragraph that Google shows you, it says that Macarius of Egypt was also known as Pseudo-Macarius. There is, however, no mention of that name in the article itself. Isn't that strange? /Bcarlssonswe (talk) 22:32, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pseudo-Macarius...or not? 

message: I removed the descriptive term "Coptic" from the description of St. Macarius. While it may refer to ethnicity as the Wiki entry on "Coptic" indicates, it more commonly designates a theological belief system (the Copts) that would be inaccurate and seriously misleading if applied to St. Macarius. It would be better to simply refer to him as Egyptian than as Coptic. 2601:940:C100:3130:510:132E:31D3:FC4F (talk) 19:51, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coptic
Talk:Arcadius

message: The editor who recently deleted external links at this article has made similar deletions at many other articles, including links to on-line text of many Early Christian writers. Discussion of this behavior, which would have been routinely reverted as vandalism if it were from an anonymous IP, may be found at Talk:Papias. -- Wetman 19:11, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted external links

message: According to August 27 (Eastern Orthodox liturgics), yes.--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 17:20, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saint?  

message: I know the caption says it's stylized but it's also very distinctive, I wonder how lifelike it is?
Middle More Rider (talk) 09:28, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: For those wondering, the above conversation was related to an image caption which no longer appears in the article. I don’t know how such things work, but this section can probably be deleted or archived as obsolete. ManuelKomnenos (talk) 17:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bust of Arcadius
Talk:Sandy Bay, Hong Kong

message: Sandy bay is always known as 大口環; NEVER 大口灣 although the latter is technically correct.  Thus it is wrong to say 大口環 is mistaken.  Names are always more interesting than they seem =).  Look at addresses of any institutions on 大口環 and you'll see that 大口灣 isn't used anywhere.  沙灣, on the other hand, is used; and in fact there's a 沙灣經.
--Mintchocicecream 19:15, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What's in a name?
Talk:Kōji (Muromachi period)

message: Kōji may refer to:
*Kōji (Heian period) (康治), Japanese era from 1142 to 1144
*Kōji (Muromachi period) (弘治), Japanese era from 1555 to 1558
This set of nengō used to be identified as
*Kōji (first) (康治), Japanese era from 1142 to 1144
*Koji (era) (弘治), Japanese era from 1555 to 1558
It was suggested that the period designations were clearer; and the same pattern seemed useful in the cases of other homonym pairs in the list of Japanese era names:
    * 976_ 貞元 |Jōgen (976 - 978)
    * 1046 永承 |Eishō (1046 - 1053)
    * 1099 康和 |Kōwa (1099 - 1104)
    * 1131 天承 |Tenshō (1131 - 1132)
    * 1142 康治 |Kōji (1142 - 1144) ---> [Jōgen (Heian period)]
    * 1207 承元 |Jōgen (1207 - 1211)
    * 1222 貞応 |Jōō (1222 - 1224)
    * 1278 弘安 |Kōan (1278 - 1288)
    * 1312 正和 |Shōwa (1312 - 1317)
    * 1361 康安 |Kōan (1361 - 1362)
    * 1381 弘和 |Kōwa (1381 - 1383) 
    * 1504 永正 |Eishō (1504 - 1521)
    * 1555 弘治 |Kōji (1555 - 1558) --> [Jōgen (Muromachi period)]
    * 1573 天正 |Tenshō (1573 - 1592)
    * 1652 承応 |Jōō (1652 - 1655)
    * 1926 昭和 |Shōwa (1926 - 1989)
If you have any further comments, questions, suggestions, etc. ..., please feel free to contribute as you see fit at Talk:Japanese era name. Ooperhoofd 02:02, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Homonyms
Talk:.410 bore

message: I took the liberty to put a photo on the article, as there was none, and as several people not involved in firearms have no idea what such a shell would look like (and .410s aren't as likely to be seen on most shooting ranges as more popular shells, like the 12 gauge.)If anyone has a problem with this, let me know. Rookie Rover 09:22, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph Added 

message: Since I was a kid I've heard that Annie Oakley dazzled crowds by shooting objects thrown into the air with a .45 caliber rifle.  The story goes that she cheated a little by firing .410 shotgun shells in the rifle.  If true this would be an interest-getter for this article, but I can't seem to verify the story.      Can anyone out there help me find if this story is true?  Pb8bije6a7b6a3w (talk) 00:58, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Annie Oakley 

message: I have added the known dates relating to Eleys history of the .410. However, they do not appear to claim that they were first to introduce this cartridge. If someone can provide evidence of an earlier introduction please add the information. (SM527RR (talk) 23:39, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: This is a common misconception.
".410" is a caliber, and refers to .41 inches in diameter.
A ".38 Special" shot shell is .38 caliber, not .38 gauge.
To help the confusion farther, a 20 "gauge" shell is larger than a .38 "caliber" shell.
"caliber" and "gauge" are not interchangeable.
(I have no comment on "bore", as that is not part of the size nomenclature I use)
I would appreciate it if someone would make this article accurate.
Kurt Schultz thipdar (ta) comcast (tod) net
2601:648:8400:31EA:D05:EE79:11C:69E5 (talk) 22:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  .410 is not a "gauge"...
Talk:T. Dan Smith

message: With time off for good behaviour, he probably did three or four years.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.173.208 (talk) 14:20, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to have been three years exactly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.173.208 (talk) 14:25, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time 

message: 'Pleaded guilty to corruption charges although he maintained his innocence'. Smith may have equivocated his way through life but we shouldn't. A man who pleads guilty is not maintaining his innocence'. Unraed (talk) 12:34, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Innocence is not the same as guilt
Talk:Azure (heraldry)

message: Not moved - It also looks like further discussion may be warranted on this subject. For example, why the use of (tincture) as the Disambiguation phrase, when (heraldry) may have been more appropriate? (See Carnation (heraldry); Sable (heraldry), Ermine (heraldry), and Sanguine (heraldry) for some examples.) Please give this at least 30 days before suggesting a new move/merge, in order to foster further discussion. - jc37 09:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

message: I think that this article (on the tincture azure), should be moved to azure (tincture), and that the disambiguation page currently at azure (disambiguation) should be moved to azure.  If no one objects, I'll move it, else I'll send it through the requested moves process (which is currently backlogged).  ENeville 03:30, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I object.  Having articles titled Azure (tincture) and Azure (color) would lead to confusion about the distinction between the pages.  Especially since azure in heraldry belongs to the heraldic class of tinctures known as "colors" (as opposed to "metals"). --EncycloPetey 14:38, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand.  It seems that you argue above (in the merge discussion) for maintaining separate pages for the color (generally) and the tincture, so the two pages (and potential confustion) already exist.  I'm simply proposing that the disambiguation page be at azure.  Is there another modified name you suggest for the article on the tincture, or are you insisting that that article be at azure?  (Or do you suggest something else?)  ENeville 18:36, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm saying that it should stay as it is.  Your proposal would make the situation more confusing than it already is. --EncycloPetey 19:09, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that it probably would be best to go through a more formalized process at this point. ENeville 15:16, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move 

message: I have requested moving azure (color) to azure, which would require moving this article to azure (tincture) (or a similarly modified namespace).  See discussion at Talk:Azure. ENeville 15:24, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Moved - I speedily moved based on the below discussion. If any concerns, please feel free to immediately start a new discussion. For example, any particular reason to not consider Azure (color) as the primary topic? - jc37 00:46, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move: to "Azure (heraldry)"
Talk:James E. Gunn

message: In the introduction to the 1984 hardback Crown edition of The Joy Makers, George Zebrowski states that "The Joy Makers was an original paperback published in 1961".
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Frosty (talk • contribs) 19:42, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I found at least two sources that say he was born on 12 July 1923.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.117.7.28 (talk) 00:58, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth

message: I deleted the 1992 Eaton Award for lifetime achievement. The Eaton Award, estab. 1979, was revamped as a life achievement award in 2008. The Locus Index to SF Awards does not list any Eaton Award for Gunn [ref name=SFAwards] and for Eaton Award lists no award that year.
One official Eaton Awards page is entirely silent about the pre-2008 version. Is there another page?
--P64 (talk) 23:10, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eaton Award 

message: As someone inserted three weeks ago without link or source , Gunn is one new member of the Science Fiction and Fantasy Hall of Fame for 2015, evidently announced five weeks ago    although the official website remains silent . --P64 (talk) 22:07, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Using only the earliest announcement I added basic prose coverage. --P64 (talk) 01:41, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science Fiction and Fantasy Hall of Fame 

message: Gunn wrote an excellent history of sf, which I borrowed from a library years ago, lots of juicy vignettes & inside stuff from rubbing elbows with 'golden age' authors.  I can't remember the title, and I don't believe it was anything as blasé as 'The History of...'.  Maybe some of you are familiar with it.  Best overview of the genre I have seen, and I've read a few.  rags (talk) 01:47, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind!  I'm sure it was Alternate Worlds.  rags (talk) 15:35, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates for books and articles, as well as tables for organising short stories, poems and/or book reviews. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 06:48, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 

message: I have the Methuen edition and it has an original copyright date of 1980. 2A00:23C5:FE1C:3701:35E0:BC3:3473:BF10 (talk) 14:03, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Dreamers: 1980, not 1981
Talk:GNU toolchain

message: *i understand that a classical toolchain permit the compilation of aa program for an unix os such as mac-osx,linux,bsd...with the same kind of processor and a few variables changes
*but what about cross compiling...is there different ways to compile an aplication from a computer to another platform??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.244.232.85 (talk) 19:46, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Different ways"? All the tools work the same. The key differences are that you need headers and libraries appropriate for the target, and they are likely to be different from the host's versions. Stan 22:07, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cross compiling

message: Wouldn't it be relevant with a list of the GNU tools in the toolchain? 88.151.46.43 09:52, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a list of the tools already. If you mean a list of binaries, then no, that would be a pretty boring list. NicM 12:09, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Was 88.151.46.43 looking for an example list of tools for a particular case? Well, a simple example might be all the tools that are mentioned in the article, except the debugger. One might be experienced, and lucky, to make work that is only slightly different then the work somebody else already did. In that case, the later work might actually work on first shot, saving the need for a debugger. 08:44, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of tools?
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-01-02/ArbCom candidates

message: I thought that my tool might be another useful comparison point for the ArbCom candidates...  It's not much more than editcoutitis, but comparing the graphs for example of Charls Matthews, Fred Bauder, Ilyanep, Jayjg, and Blankfaze notes some largish differences in edit patterns.  Anyway, if somebody thinks this is a good idea, I've modified the page and placed it at User:Interiot/Sandbox/Arbcom in case anyone wants to copy-n-paste it in.  --Interiot 19:51, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, we generally don't modify articles after they've been published unless in case of error, and I can't make a justification to break that guideline this time. However, great work on your tool, and I'll think of it next time! (For sake of consistancy, though, I probably won't include links in the next issue where there are several new candidates that didn't go in this issue.) Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 21:54, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

message: :Ilyanep
:First edit date: May 7, 2003
:Administrator since prior to 2003
Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2005/Candidate_statements#Ilyanep states "I've been here since May 2003", so the admin date is probably the one that's wrong. 
Same errors for Filiocht and Jdforrester. -- Jeandré, 2006-01-06t11:45z
:I probably should have made it clearer (and I've done so now): when listed as "Adminship prior to 2003", it means that the candidate was granted adminship before WP:RfA started, which was in July of 2003. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 01:47, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Admin dates.

message: i announced my candidacy yesterday. i'd like to be added to this signpost list of candidates. Kingturtle 21:46, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The rest of the 27 candidates who signed up after Monday will be profiled in this week's edition. Flcelloguy (A note?) 22:02, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  may i be added?