lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hexagon Havoc

message: I was working on getting all the games for 1994-2001 in at once, and didn't initially put the introduction on this page.  It makes sense, trust me.  See usfirst.org for the 2006 iteration of the competition, or look at chiefdelphi.com for a forums dedicated to the competition
Bongle 13:07, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Matthew Ashimolowo

message: Wikipedia is biased, am actually disappointed with the search results I got from Wikipedia on Pastor Asimolowo's identity. Only the irregularities were stressed. What about his exploits? Impacts on the populace? Wikipedia has always been my place of intense study; and I do not want to lose interest in it. Change up the write-up Wikipedia  Ajayi Temitope Michael (talk) 03:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is a community effort of real people such as you and me.  Multiple editors, not just a single author, contribute to most articles, including this one, and attempt to do so in an objective, unbiased way, making sure that material is reliably sourced. Articles about living people, such as the subject here, are additionally constrained by the policies at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons.  Such articles try to avoid the extremes of being unduly critical (at one end of the spectrum) and fan-based (at the other end).  If you believe the article is incorrect, please feel free to suggest specific corrections, indicating reliable sources. Hope that helps. Feline Hymnic (talk) 22:03, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: new section; Nov 2019
Talk:Invisible Touch (song)

message: In the template it says 15 in UK, the text says 1? 88.73.82.235 13:16, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: template

message: "a meditation on intangibility"
--This is from the novel and film version of American Psycho:
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/American_Psycho_(film)
It's like someone was trying to insert a joke into the article, and now it's been reprinted all over the internet.  We should fix this.  Wikipedia shouldn't even say vague things like "meditation on intangibility".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.144.28.71 (talk) 20:03, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we have to include Patrick Bateman?
Talk:Locksley Hall

message: William Wordsworth cannot have written a rebuttal to "Locksley Hall Sixty Years After", since that poem was published in 1886, and Wordsworth died in April 1850. He may, however, have written a rebuttal to "Locksley Hall", which was published in Tennyson's 1842 collection of poems.
Paulannis (talk) 10:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cultural influence

message: Was it written in 1835 or 1838? Sources differ. Danceswithzerglings (talk) 02:34, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of writing

message: I think that term is a bit over-the-top, particularly with reference to a "new world order".  In any case, there's no reference for the claims, so I'm deleting them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.65.0.122 (talk) 00:21, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Prophetic"?  Really? 

message: Huh?  What is the basis for this claim?  Kdammers (talk) 01:45, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:   "Locksley Hall" is one of his lesser-known works.
Talk:Valenzetti

message: I love Lost for crying out loud, but come on, this place is an encyclopedia, not a forum for promoting a television show. Coffeeboy 14:24, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The Lost Game is very clever, but they need to denote their own work with a symbol or something. This has made me question the truth of all Wikipedia submissions. This page is clearly false, as is the Gary Troup page.Julizard
Can we just move this page to the lostpedia subsite, rather than deleting it? 141.154.149.168 18:00, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

text: * This is no different than many other characters of books, movies, and television that have their own article.  I've attempted a re-write and copyedit to see if it will fall more in guidelines. agapetos_angel 11:32, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Just Silly

message: The following edit was made by User:63.201.147.43. It is patently "talk", so I moved it here. Fluit 05:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Talk" moved from main article

message: I've just reblanked it - it was restored with quotation marks around everywhere. The problem is, we don't actually have a source from which this material comes. So there are three scenarios:
*The material is copied verbatim from an unnamed source - copyvio
*The material is copied from a source which allows it to be copied, and for which we know the source - should be moved to WikiSource, or removed and just cited
*The material does not exist anywhere else - original research
In all cases, it does not belong here. We cannot do anything with this article until we have a verifiable source. Stevage 12:56, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This kills me.  The_Dharma_Initiative has an article, but this one is blanked.  The quotes were to indicate that it was fictional. agapetos_angel 15:21, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The_Dharma_Initiative is not original research, there is no verification of a source for the information in this article.  If it were a quote from Bad Twin, that would be a source. Coffeeboy 15:55, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Source?

message: Gary Troup Website is an official ABC website, using it is perfectly acceptible. Coffeeboy 18:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gary Troup Website

message: I agree with the merge templates currently on this article.  Gary Troup is probably the better fit of the two suggested merge targets. --Takeel 03:11, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would like to add that fancruft which claims be real is a particularly touchy subject to me when it comes to this encyclopedia.  I am generally against including it unless it is extremely notable.  --Takeel 03:15, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Wikipedia in culture

message: Should notable mentions of Wikipedia relating to criminal cases be included either here or elsewere on the site? This could include: Wikipedias coverage of a criminal case if the coverage is itself notable (Gabby Petito comes to mind, maybe similar to the Wikipedia and the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine article); significant mentions of Wikipedia during a court case (similar to the existing "in politics" section); and direct involvement of Wikipedia in the crime (like the recent D.C. shooter editing Wikipedia articles of his target before and during the crime, and his profile here that has been mentioned in the coverage). That last one might be considered giving perpetrators too much publicity, though there is probably a balance to include a selected few major cases on a relatively low trafficed page like this, I doubt anyone would argue that the List of mass shootings in the United States is encouraging more mass shootings. 
--jonas (talk) 04:28, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia in Crime? 

message: Should Depths of Wikipedia be included on this page? --QueenofBithynia (talk) 17:39, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Depths of Wikipedia
Talk:Strandloper (novel)

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:AlanGarner Strandloper.jpg, found on :Strandloper, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 16:30, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
Talk:Sango (InuYasha)

message: I just noticed this, but Kohaku is not mentioned in the relationships section. Can someone add this? (perferably someone who up to date on the manga. [I am currently on chapter 300ish])  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.223.143 (talk) 05:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing Relationships

message: Relocated some of the trivia section to other parts of the article. The remaining bits, just to keep them here somewhere, are included below: 
*Sango possesses a resemblance to Ukyo Kuonji from Ranma ½. This rationale comes from the fact that they both have long hair, carry a large primary weapon on their backs and are even both voiced by Kelly Sheridan in the English dubs.
*Sango's English voice actor, Kelly Sheridan, also provides the voice of Barbie.
*Sango's name like her brother Kohaku means a type of gemstone. Sango is Japanese for coral.
Anon e Mouse Jr.69.141.234.101 23:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing trivia 

message: Why have details pertaining to Miroku and Sango's interaction and current relationship been omitted? MegaZilla 06:27, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sango and Miroku relationship pages

message: Sango is not a ninja. She is a demon slayer and her brother Kohaku is that too. I don't know if anyone here has watched all the anime but Kohaku says in a couple of episodes to Bankotsu "I'm not a ninja" so why is Kohaku and Sango on the list of "Fictional ninjas"? Their armor maybe resembles the ninja uniform but they're not ninjas.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.252.61.104 (talk) 15:55, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ninja?
Talk:John Burton-Race

message: Burton Race was born in Singapore, according to his website. I can't find a reference to say why he would be considered British - as the article previously held. As such I've removed that until someone can find a source. Thanks Kymara 13:53, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality

message: ...which is it to be? Is it double-barreled, or is "Burton" simply his nickname?
If it's a middle name, wouldn't it just be John Race?80.195.13.74 (talk) 23:59, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Burton Race is his surname, not hyphenated. Hence the article's title is correct. 81.156.126.30 (talk) 11:16, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is hyphenated on his website http://www.johnburtonrace.tv/ and on IMDB, although not in the Daily Telegraph report. I'm moving it to include the hyphen. – Fayenatic London 13:42, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: John Burton-Race or John "Burton" Race?
Talk:Paul Vachon

message: any reliable source that states that he sold them during the cabbage patch craze?And when exact was the cabbage patch kids craze?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krazyj2010 (talk • contribs) 03:07, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cabbage Patch Kids
Talk:Maurice Vachon

message: That he "has been married twice and is currently married to his third wife" suggests to me that he's been married thrice not twice. Can anyone clear up the confusion?75.157.135.57 (talk) 06:54, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The source listed says nothing about his marriages.  It will need to be clarified and sourced or removed.Tomsv 98 (talk) 18:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

text: I found a source and edited the information.Tomsv 98 (talk) 20:13, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused marriage status 

message: At some point, he was a star candidate for the New Democratic Party. But I don't retrieve such information on Wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.176.120.156 (talk) 03:06, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh, okay.  Methinks you have him confused with his brother, actually. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions  03:12, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Political involvement
Talk:Vivian Vachon

message: O.K,did she retire in 1978 after she married Buddy Wolfe and then come back in 1986 or did she retire in 1986? If she came back in 1986,shouldn't where it say retired:1979 ?  not retired:1986?  --Krazyj2010 (talk) 19:49, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Retired?

message: I'm wanting to put a pic of her on the page,but i don't know how.Can someone help me?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krazyj2010 (talk • contribs) 15:10, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Help
Talk:The Big White

message: Why did the hit mens' boss want to see the body?  --AStanhope 02:33, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To confirm the death. -- Longhair 02:44, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hit Men 

message: Is it really the way that Margaret’s »tourette-syndrom» is a motivation for Paul to attempt all what he did? I don’t think so. Robin Williams plays a character who is too weak to go straight forward in live. Instead he spends his intelligence on frauds of all kinds especially frauding insurances. His profession is travel agent. Does he really knows about the voyage of his life? Of course not. Travel agents give their best in improvisation not in assembling schedules. And the moral is that in an evolutionary philosophy one must admit that this way of live — frauding improvisation — often is succesfull. The scene with one of the hitmen who takes the role of the philosopher in this movie by telling Margaret about her »Hypochondriac or The Imaginary Invalid« shows this together with the scene where Paul and Margaret receive a letter from another insurance telling them that Margaret’s tourette-syndrom isn’t subject to financial advantages. a.gerold@pps.de 213.61.227.97 (talk) 09:43, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  the wife’s tourette-syndrom
Talk:Rúaidhrí Conroy

message: For the record, Ruaidrhi Conroy -- though sometimes called Rory -- is not the Rory Conroy of RTE's Fair City.
* "The two listings are in fact different people." (Source: help desk staff at IMDb)
* "No, as far as any of us are aware, Ruaidhri Conroy was never in Fair City."  (Source: producers of RTE's The Cafe)
So, there you have it. -- Robocoder 02:35, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hence my disambig at the top of the article, to forstall any confusion :) Credit to Robocoder though, I created the stub and added bits, but most of the good research was done by him. MartinRe 02:55, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rory Conroy 

message: Should the article be at Rúaidhrí Conroy with redirects from Ruaidhri Conroy rather than the other way around? I'm undecided, but if anyone feels like changing it, feel free, as moving an article over a redirect with no history can be done by anyone. Regards, MartinRe 09:33, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 
Talk:Ararat, Victoria

message: Is this article about Barkly Street or the city of Ararat ?  I always thought Wikipedia was an encyclopedia rather than a collection of postcards but it seems that some people still prefer it be the latter.  To me, all the photo in the infobox shows is one small part of Ararat.  There are no recognisable landmarks in it.  It doesn't even show the main shopping area.  Its just shows a bunch of cars and a handful of run of the mill non-descript buildings.  Makes Ararat look like a small country town and there is absolutely no context that this is a city of almost 10,000 people.  Have a look at other similar sized cities and there are aerial photos, photos from the city's main lookout etc.  Bigger cities have recognisable skylines.  I think a broader picture gives a sense of not just a handful of commercial buildings, but the general housing, urban form and surrounding geography. --WalkingMelbourne (talk) 09:24, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox picture 
Talk:A Hot Piece of Grass

message: The track list on this page completely disagrees with the track list on both Hayseed Dixie's  own web page and the Google music listing.
For instance, "Marijuana" is listed as track 13 here, and track 11 by Hayseed Dixie. "Uncle Virgil", track 11 here, is not even on this album according to their web page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Strongbow (talk • contribs) 21:32, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:A Kiss in the Dreamhouse

message: I am surprised there is no mention of the reason this excellent album was never released as a CD  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.129.21.29 (talk) 03:35, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This brand new user, 2601:A:4100:5A:642E:1EB6:B88:2B18 with a brand new ip has been vandalising this page for two months for genre warring. BEATWEAKer edited the same thing at this article on  01:10, 9 September 2012‎ as 2601:A:4100:5A:642E:1EB6:B88:2B18, what a coincidence. This was quickly corrected 15 minutes later by IllaZilla at 01:44, 9 September 2012 . Carliertwo (talk) 15:55, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: February 2013: vandalism by a brand new IP [[Special:Contributions/2601:A:4100:5A:642E:1EB6:B88:2B18|2601:A:4100:5A:642E:1EB6:B88:2B18]] that looks like a clone of  [[Special:Contributions/BEATWEAKer|BEATWEAKer]], a user that has been blocked indefinitely
Talk:Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co.

message: I would say that everything after thuue first paragraph in Implications section should be moved elsewere. It might be relevent in legal world but is not relevant to this article. Copyright consequences as well as similar cases in other countries might go in the article Telephone directory, or (if long enough) in a dedicated article "Copyright on phone directories".
Publications v. Meredith, Matthew Bender v. West and all the rest are subject to their respective articles and do not need here citation beyond inclusion in a bulleted list of articles to see.
Similarly I doubt Feist v. Rural have ever mentioned any debates between the U.S. Congress and E.U., or any of the latter is basing the negotiations purely on the former! Let's keep relevant thing together but separate the barely relevant ones apart. -- Goldie (tell me) 02:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Support this split. Although (very) excellent copy, it needs to live in an article of its own as it strays wildly from the article name.Pedro1999a |  Talk   21:19, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Weak Against. The content is relevant to the article, although I suppose a separate article could be made, with a link at the bottom of this one pointing to the new article as "additional information" or something. -- NightKev 07:15, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

text: weak oppose or alternative suggested by Nightkev.  I object to Bggoldie's assertion that this topic is so prosaic that it belongs in the telephone directory article.  There are significant legal issues here that go beyond the case which are addressed very nicely in the article (and they are the reason I looked for this article).  However, I suppose we could put them in a dedicated article, so that this page would mostly just be shell for the other one. nadav 06:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Oppose  The content is relevant to this article. — Omegatron 22:10, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Oppose  I agree with Omegatron that the content is relevant to the article. Argel1200 (talk) 09:33, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Strong oppose. The discussion is relevant and the implications extend far beyond merely telephone directories. I'm stunned to read that relevance in the "legal world" is thought not to apply to an article specifically about a Supreme Court decision! Kestenbaum (talk) 14:50, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Oppose While it's true the information could be the source of new articles, I don't see any reason why it should be removed from this article. It's relevant and the article is not overly long.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 15:58, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split-merge suggestion 

message: Does Feist bear at all on Major League Baseball's claims to have the right to control how its statistics are used? I've seen efforts to prevent rotisserie leagues from using it, or making money on it.  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  02:22, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strike 3?
Template talk:Cardcaptor Sakura

message: Recently 5 articles have been produced of the Cardcaptor Sakura Original Soundtracks (OST 1, OST 2, OST 3, OST 4, Movie 1 OST) And I was thinking of including these in the template for all related Card Captor Sakura articles to have access. I know there is a Media Information link and then you go to the OST from there but that where the annoyance comes from. I already started to produce the new feature of the OST's as a Music Guide. Justify or critisize my requisition, or suggest notes to make improvments for the new Music Guide. Thank you. Xangel 13:16, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted as well as redirected the articles. They're nothing more than track listings, rather than encyclopedic articles. -- Ned Scott 04:01, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wait a minute. Why did you remove all articles on the Cardcaptor Sakura Soundtracks? These Soundtracks are officially part of the Cardcaptor Sakura franchise and you also say that they are nothing more than track listings. They have one paragraph each so therefore shouldn't you leave it as they are but place a stub tag on them. I am new to this wikipedia editing thing but frankly I'm upset about this. Jeez. Xangel 04:41, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The paragraphs were all the same "this is a soundtrack for..". I'm sorry if you are upset by this, and please don't take it personally, but these are the kind of articles we try to avoid on Wikipedia. They have a tendency to spread like weeds, because people see one so they think it's ok to start another. If we have anything that can be said about a specific OST that couldn't be said on the list of media page, then there would be a reason to have stubs. -- Ned Scott 04:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cardcaptor Sakura OST's 

message: What happened to this template?  I really liked this template before Dinoguy1000's April edit using this "Navbox" program...  What gives?  Is there some kind of standard the previous one didn't adhere to?
MasamuneXGP (talk) 03:08, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it was done by project consensus months ago, as part of an on-going effort to clean up our eries templates. As you guessed, the previous one did not adhere to the standard appearance, hence it being recorded to use the standard Navbox system. It cleaned up the appearance, makes it more consistent with other series templates, and made it much easier to modify the template even with little template experience.-- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This was discussed on the SM project's talk page before it was done, anyways. —Dinoguy1000 17:39, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that was about the SM template...this is the CCS one *grin* -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 19:35, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, right... *slaps forehead* duh... —Dinoguy1000 20:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Navbox?
Talk:Hobart FM

message: Gee this is a bit of a funny page to find here. It's good, but clearly it's been written by somebody involved with the project, and probably seems to advertise too much, and certainly contains more information than I'd think people would care for. Tilgrieog 14:24, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Currently, I have added the item of Aartists4Mercy to the See also section for open discussion of its suitability, as this radio station is under the umbrella of NPO.  According to some regulations of developed country, the radio station must obtain a licence for broadcasting and I don't know if the site is licenced  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.62.138.94 (talk) 10:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regulating soul music or new age music station ??? 

message: (Yes, imagine vortually all entries to this page have and will be by people associated with the station. Who on Earth else would know anything about it?)
In any case, though this a wholly inadequate defence, I broadcast on the station for 22 years, and served on the management committee three times, including as progam director and vice president. I do have program guides from 1979 and 1980, but there are no links to them online. I have attempted to flesh out a little of the musical evolution of the station, without gainsaying anything previously posted. Oh, and I also broadcast the first program under the 7 THE FM callsign, which is how I know the date of the changeover.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Braka (talk • contribs) 17:08, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Most recent update