lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Krylov–Bogolyubov theorem

message: The colors in this article are horrible and make me want to gouge my eyes out rather than to read the theorems. Mcxz (talk) 20:24, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horrible Colors 

message: The following excerpt from sci.math may be of interest to future editors.
The Relationship Between Measure-Theoretic and Topological Notions:
It does not make sense to say that ergodicity is EQUIVALENT to TT (topological
transitivity).  A topological dynamical system, i.e. X compact metric with
T: X \rightarrow X continuous, has a different structure from a measure
theoretical dynamical system, i.e., (X, \M, \mu) a probability measure space
with T:X \rightarrow X a measureable mapping preserving the \mu measure, in the
sense that for all measureable sets E, \mu T^{-1}(E) = \mu (E).
However, given a TDS (topological dynamical system), there are always MTDS's
(measure-theoretical dynamical systems) associated with it.  First, take \M
to be the Borel algebra (smallest sigma algebra containing all the open and
closed sets).  Then the Krylov-Bogoliubov Theorem says that every T
continuous has at least one T-invariant measure, i.e. \mu such that
(X, Borel, \mu, T) is a measure theoretical dynamical system.  Moreover,
the set of Borel measures on X form a compact convex subset of a separable
Banach space, an infinite dimensional ``simplex whose vertices correspond
to delta measures on X, and for each T, the set of T-invariant measures
forms a ``sub-simplex.  (You can actually draw this for the case of X
a finite space with the discrete topology; the geometry is quite beautiful,
although rather misleading vis a vis infinite X.)  A beautiful theorem says
that the ergodic T-invariant measures are exactly the vertices of the
sub-simplex of T-invariant measures!  The point is this:
:EVERY TDS is associated with at least one ergodic MTDS!
Also, TDS's clearly have ``a higher level of structure than MTDS's,
so your assertion about TT and ergodicity confused two levels of
structure.
[Note: A delta measure \delta_x is indeed a point mass: for all Borel
measureable  sets E, \delta_x(E) = 1 if x \in E and 0 otherwise.]
Nevertheless, there are relations between topological and measure theoretic
conditions.  For instance, if (X,T) is an invertible TDS (T is a homeo),
and if there exists an ergodic T-invariant measure which gives positive
measure to every nonempty open set, then (X, T) is TT.
Incidentally, the spelling “Bogoliubov” gets somewhat more Google hits. --KSmrqT 00:17, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Found on newsgroup 

message: The Springer Online Encyclopædia of Mathematics has an article on the Krylov–Bogolyubov method of averaging which may be of interest. --KSmrqT 03:24, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible source to cite?
Talk:Overseas Service Bar

message: Is there/has there been a maximum number of bars that can be awarded?  Could a person who served 20 years overseas in combat zones wear 40 bars?  Surely not, if only for aesthetic reasons...  --Xyzzyva 09:56, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a hypothetical question. I don't think that there has ever been a United States service member spending 20 years in a combat zone. Not even a soldier joining the Army in 1941 fighting in every war in his time of service could get 20 years of combat service. But should this ever happen, the Army would probably design a special uniform for those soldiers, as they would be national heroes...scnr. --84.56.97.250 (talk) 17:36, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The actual restriction on the number is a real one.  E.g., the bar is authorized for service in a combat zone, which is designated by Congress or the Secretary of Defense.  So in practical terms, you simply add up the time frames in which there are designated combat zones, and compare those time frames to a servicemember who served during elapsed periods.  Now with Afghanistan approaching 10 years in duration, you could get 20+ bars on your sleeve, but you'd either be crazy or, more likely, a phony.--S. Rich 20:33, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maximum 

message: If a soldier is killed in a combat zone before six months, do they automatically get an Overseas Service Bar posthumously? Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 15:09, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Posthumous?
Talk:John Macoun

message: Apparently, the article at UlsterOnline is plagiarised from here, and not vice-versa. We're looking into getting the situation corrected. DS 00:20, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nosgoth

message: Soo.....any news yet about the full release? Meaning non beta release. Nighthawk418 (talk) 19:01, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final Release Date 

message: Timelines aren't the clearest with game series which involve time travel, but from what it says under plot, this appears to take place after the events of Blood Omen 2 and Soul Reaver in the future? So basically anything that happens here wouldn't actually effect the game events? 64.231.169.3 (talk) 02:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Chronology with games
Talk:Orsten

message: @Hemiauchenia, here is a list of Orsten fossils if you find it useful. Qohelet12 (talk) 19:27, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: By the way I finished Jianfengia but now I'm busy with another reconstruction, sorry for not posting it on the review page. Qohelet12 (talk) 19:31, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of taxa
Talk:9 (New York City Subway service)

message: Engine, Engine, number nine on the New York Transit Line?
Is that in relation to this 9?
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.65.116.97 (talk • contribs).
Yes and I was just about to post about this but saw you already did a long time ago.  It mentions this song on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engine_Engine_Number_9 but no reference to the MTA # 9 subway line that used to exist.  Both the subway and song's page should mention something about both but I'm not sure how to do it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:387:5:80D:0:0:0:B5 (talk) 17:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous line?
Talk:Nuclear Reactor Operator Badge

message: Hello. I am a veteran of the ANPP and I will be adding a lot of material on Wikipedia and editing the pages that exist now that are related to the program, including this one. It is good to see this here, but this page needs a lot of work with regard to the badges, their requirements, etc. I hope to end up with a well-organized set of pages (articles) that cover the ANPP.  Rb88guy (talk) 19:46, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Army Nuclear Power Program

message: And a picture of my CRO badge. I have other badge pics, will try to add them. I typed this stuff directly from a scanned copy of the SOP at the SM-1, which I still have. All this material, and lots more, needs to be moved into an improved ANPP article, which I will try to create. Rb88guy (talk) 01:08, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Added corrected qualification requirements section

message: To main ANPP article. Makes more sense there. Rb88guy (talk) 20:25, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved qualification requirements

message: Does anyone know the origin of the symbol on the badges? Does it have some particular meaning? One would think that perhaps the model of the atom would be used on such a badge, but the Army badge looks kind of like an engineering symbol of some kind. Some background info would be nice in the article. DesScorp (talk) 20:06, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The only thing I have found on these badge's design was from The Army Institute of Heraldry's (TIOH) website for the Nuclear Reactor Operator Badges.  The center device is one of the astronomical symbols for the planet Uranus, specifically the one more commonly found in older British literature.  Since Uranus sounds similar to Uranium, it could be why it was chosen.  I have no idea why the rest of the badges were designed the way they were.  However, the TIOH is big on design reasoning (which this YouTube video from 1969), so if you contacted them they may give you some good information on why they designed these badges the way they did and you can share that information with the rest of the world via Wikipeida. --McChizzle (talk) 21:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

text: I found and added the design rationale for TIOH. --McChizzle (talk) 19:50, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Badge Symbol
Talk:Noble Patron of Armor Award

message: From what I can gather, this award has not been given out all that much. Is anyone able to expand upon the list I have managed to gather. The reference for Richard “Dick” Chegar says that there was 5 ppl with it in Fall of '05, but I can only locate 3 so far. Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 09:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Receivers of the Award
Talk:Reservation (law)

message: Are this contents copied from (or summarized) a textbook? I don't understand why the "Table of Authority" is here. (never seen in other articles.) Maybe the section should be included into reference/footnotes and be deleted. 210.219.37.250 (talk) 01:25, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  About writing structure 

message: This page is the redirect target for the term "interpretative declarations", yet the page barely mentions what this means.  (It's stated in off-hand comment in a sentence.  That sentence tries to outlink to the page on "interpretative declarations", presumably for more information, yet the outlink simply redirects to the same page.)  It would help if someone with more knowledge of international law than me expands on this area, either on this page or as a new page. Mpearson42 (talk) 03:20, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  interpretative declarations
Talk:Pico House

message: BMK, I've readded the trivia tag, because the examples concerned do feel like a random list of when it's appeared on a TV programme, and don't tell us anything about Pico House itself. A statement like "On January 7, 2011, the building was featured on Travel Channel's Ghost Adventures, with Kane Hodder and Rick McCullum", for example, may potentially be true, but it's not the kind of thing I'd personally expect to find in a serious encyclopaedia article or secondary work, unless it was followed by some sort of explanation about how it mattered to the building from a reliable secondary source. For example, if its appearance on the Ghost Adventures was particular well-known or notable, or if something significant happened to the house as a result, it would seem notable (and the event would probably be mentioned in reliable secondary sources because of that) - but as it stands, to me as an editor it does feel like an item of trivia. Hchc2009 (talk) 17:40, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it again, as, obviously, there is as yet no consensus for it. BMK (talk) 17:49, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Very happy to engage with you and discuss it, BMK (although it is very late in my time zone, so if I log off soon, please don't think it rude of me!). Hchc2009 (talk) 17:54, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

text: I concur with Hchc that some of the material currently in the article is trivial in nature. Further, we typically do not require consensus to place a tag on an article, as one of its intentions is to encourage editors to discuss the issue in order to find a way to amicably address concerns. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:51, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: On the basis of the talk page discussion here, which suggests a degree of consensus that there is an issue to be resolved, I've re-added the tag. Hchc2009 (talk) 06:42, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia question... 

message: A few years ago I added content about a supposed carriage entrance on Sanchez Street, halfway around the building from the Main Street entrance.  However, period photographs generally indicate that guests arrived and entered at the Main Street entrance, which at various times in its early history was shaded by an awning.  The large gate I mentioned in the article was almost certainly used for supply wagons and other large vehicles, rather than passenger vehicles like carriages and stagecoaches.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pithecanthropus4152 (talk • contribs) 23:17, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Large carriage entrance" on Sanchez Street (corrected)
Talk:Fort Moore (1846-1853)

message: To strengtehen the article, I would convert the references into footnotes. --evrik 04:45, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea, but at this point its going to be difficult.  A lot of this article was actually gleaned from a number of other Wikipedia articles on specific people/places/events. --Bobak 15:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Some mention should be made of the historic Fort Moore Hill Cemetery (see here), which was later relocated. MisfitToys 19:24, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Great find.  I'll work it in (you shouldn't hesitate, of course ;-) ).  --Bobak 15:28, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cemetery

message: Statues of José Mariá Flores, Jose Antonio Carrillo and Andres Pico should be erected here, as they were brave Californio defenders of their homes, land and country. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DonDeigo (talk • contribs) 22:00, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Californio Heros

message: I have noticed your recent edits of Fort Moore of November 17. Unfortunate your very colorful but interesting language appears to have a number of apparent factual errors. Do you have any citations that could support your additions? Could the views of a relatively dry and arid area from a hastily erected military fort that could lob cannon balls into a recently conquered village be called "romantic"? Early photographs of Los Angeles are notable for the lack of trees prior to the introduction of additional irrigation provided during the later American period. Early USGS topographic maps made before the removal of Fort Moore Hill showed Sunset Blvd. (now Cesar Chavez) being north of the Hill and separates the Hill from another hill on what is now the west side of the current Chinatown. Another error that you appeared to have added is the mention that Hill extends west to the "modern Los Angeles High School". Unfortunately the current Los Angeles High School is at Olympic and Rimpau, 7 miles west of Downtown, where it has been since 1917. Describing Los Angeles as an "adobe town" might be anachronistic. Although true for the Spanish period, may not be true for the Mexican period during which foreign trade occurred. When Richard Dana visited Los Angeles a decade earlier, he described Los Angeles as a town of brick and stone, which replaced adobe during the Mexican period.
 
If you can support your interesting description with solid references, I would like to keep most of it. If you can't support most of your statement, I would have no choice but to revert it as fanciful unreferenced material. 107.216.165.224 (talk) 03:18, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Your recent additions to Fort Moore
Talk:Gillmore Medal

message: Not sure about this article's sources; Major Robert Anderson commanded Fort Sumter. Scott Mingus 03:12, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Found the answer in a bio of Gillmore. His men was struck for the men he commanded in 1863. The article incorrectly asserted that the medal commemorated the first battle of the war battle of Fort Sumter, which neither featured Gillmore not his men. I have since corrected this article. Scott Mingus 03:17, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anderson commanded Fort Sumter, not Gillmore, in 1861
Talk:Good–Turing frequency estimation

message: This needs a description of the actual technique used by Good and Turing, which is notable by its absence from this article. -- The Anome 00:25, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right and this has now been (partly) rectified Encyclops 01:17, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Jurafski and Martin's authorative work "Speech and Language Processing" (Chapter 6, section 6.3) mentions a Good-Turing Smoothing algorithm which seems to have some relevance to this article but doesn't entirely fit the formulas described here as far as I can tell. Does anyone know how or if it is related, and whether it should be incorporated here or in a separate article?
Gijs Kruitbosch 00:41, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Turing Smoothing 

message: The following is copied from the Stats project talk page. Melcombe (talk) 14:23, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "Instead we plot [...]"
Shouldn't there be a plot? Please add some illustrations or adjust the text. Thank you! --Peni (talk) 14:01, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

text: P.S. Source: Good-Turing smoothing without tears, William A. Gale Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 1995. --Peni (talk) 15:39, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold. --Qwfp (talk) 17:27, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example plot request 

message: Has anyone read the novel by Robert Harris? Is it relevant to the topic of this article or should the reference be removed?  The comment "The book, though fiction, is criticised by people who were at Bletchley Park as bearing little resemblance to the real wartime Bletchley Park" makes me doubt that the authour has any valid technical or historical points to offer on the subject at hand. Encyclops (talk) 16:54, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Novel by Robert Harris 

message: N_r is still zero, so Z_r iis zero... i think this is a mistake.
maybe Z_r is the average of Z_q and Z_t ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.110.184.55 (talk) 09:16, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  N_r is still zero, so Z_r iis zero... i think this is a mistake 

message: There's a tag calling for a non-primary source for the Sampson/Gale work - how about http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~lorenzo/teaching/cs134/Archive/Spring2010/milestone/20100511-134-milestone-cooley/node5.html
109.158.8.39 (talk) 18:23, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  source for Sampson Gale
Talk:U.S. military instructor badges

message: I would like to create a "Military Instructor Badges" page that would merge information from this page, the Air Education and Training Command Instructor Badge page, and would create information for the U.S. Navy's Recruit Division Commander Badges and the U.S. Coast Guard's Company Commander Badge.  There is little information on the Navy's and Coast Guard's instructor badges; thus, they would make poor independent pages. What thoughts or comments do you have? --McChizzle (talk) 14:30, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Creating a "Military Instructor Badges" Page

message: Why doesn’t this page reference the US Navy’s Master Training Specialist qualification? It has recently been updated: <https://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=64684>. Stu (talk) 20:53, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there a seperate badge that is worn by those who get qualified or is it now part of the qualification required to earn one of the badges?  If not, I don't see the relevance given this page is about the badges.  If you want to try and work it into the Navy section, go for it; just make certain you associated it correctly with the appropriate badge, given the specific subject of this article. --McChizzle (talk) 23:15, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Master Training Specialist qualification
Talk:Better Halves (Heroes)

message: Just a reminder to editors adding plot details to this episode.  Other Heroes articles have been tagged for cleanup, since their plots are excessively long.  Please try to limit the section to 5-6 paragraphs.  See WP:NOT - Plot summaries for official policy. --Madchester 00:54, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Synopsis

message: There is a similar trivia about prop money at The Fix (Heroes). Why is this one removed? Double standard? --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 06:23, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No idea what you mean by "double standard", but it's gone from this article and gone from The Fix (Heroes) as well. This type of detail is completely non-notable - the use of fake money is a standard practise in film and television production. Wikipedia also is not a place to record notes about minor production details - goofs, continuity errors, and the like. Thanks for pointing out "The Fix" though. --Ckatzchatspy 06:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Very well, if the same standard applies to all episode articles. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 06:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It does (or it should). That aside, I see from your contribution list that you have an interest in currencies. You might wish to see if there is an existing article that either focuses on or incorporates details about "fake" money for film and television production purposes. If not, you might wish to consider creating one. (The information is definitely interesting, but better suited to a broader, production-related article rather than an article about a specific episode of a particular series.) Cheers. --Ckatzchatspy 07:02, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia about $100 bill 
Talk:Uposatha

message: The current article reads:
:Uposatha days are times of renewed dedication to Dhamma practice, observed by both lay people and monastics throughout the world of Theravada Buddhism. 
:For monastics, these are often days of more intensive reflection and meditation. In many monasteries, physical labor (construction projects, repairs, etc.) is curtailed. On New Moon and Full Moon days the fortnightly confession and recitation of the Patimokkha (monastic rules of conduct) takes place. 
:Lay people observe the eight precepts on Uposatha days, as a support for meditation practice and as a way to re-energize commitment to the Dhamma. Whenever possible, lay people use these days as an opportunity to visit the local monastery, in order to make special offerings to the Sangha, to listen to Dhamma, and to practice meditation with Dhamma companions late into the night.
This is a verbatim copy from the first two-and-half paragraphs of John T. Bullitt's article, http://www.accesstoinsight.org/ptf/dhamma/sila/uposatha.html.  As indicated in an earlier version of this article, this copying does not seem to violate www.accesstoinsight.org's own rules as indicated at  http://www.accesstoinsight.org/faq.html#myweb which states:
:May I copy your pages onto my website?  
:Yes, provided that you make them available free of charge. I also ask that you please post a simple notice somewhere on your website acknowledging that the materials came from here. Although I don't require it, as a service to your visitors you might also consider including a link to http://www.accesstoinsight.org, so that your visitors can easily get hold of the most up-to-date editions of these texts (I steadily receive corrections and revisions from translators, authors, and publishers). Finally, please make it clear to your visitors what material on your site comes from here and what comes from other sources.
Nonetheless, it would probably be more in line with WP etiquette and policy and WP readers' expectations for this article to be re-written with original text. If no one else does so, I hope to do so sometime in the next few weeks.  Heads up!  Cheers,
LarryR(Talk) 04:24, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: AtI's copyright policy is quite generous, but we still can't meet their requirements, and so our having this text contravenes their copyright. I'll put it up for deletion.—Nat Krause(Talk!) 04:57, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense.  Thanks Nat.  For what it's worth, per the copyvio notice, I've started a re-write at Talk:Uposatha/Temp. - LarryR 12:37, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

text: The rewrite currently lists 18 bibliographic sources and has 28 end notes.  I'm thinking it's relatively stable for the moment (at least as far as WP articles go).  (Thanks too to Sacca for sharing his Vinaya references/knowledge and real-world experience!)  It's been over a week since the copyvio notice was first posted.  Please replace.  Thanks! LarryR 23:33, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, and thanks for the awesome work, LarryR! --Aguerriero (talk) 23:59, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plan to re-write possible [[copyvio]] text