lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Userboxes/Food

message: This user wants to know what happened to Template:User hot chocolate and Template:User don't drink.
They were here just days ago — where'd they go?
They're still listed on the page, but since they were just recently here, I didn't know whether to remove the now-broken links or what. -Garrett W. (talk) 07:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They were moved as part of user box migration from the template name space to the user name space. They are now located on the User:UBX page. --Jeremy (blah blah) 17:51, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing links 

message: Can you please separate the nut and seed section onto their own gallery page. Catfurball (talk) 17:00, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: , at Wikipedia:Userboxes/Food/Nuts and seeds. - Ahunt (talk) 20:38, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion 

message: Can you please move the condiment userboxes onto their own gallery page. Catfurball (talk) 21:51, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: at Wikipedia:Userboxes/Condiments. - Ahunt (talk) 22:22, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion
Talk:The Empress (tarot card)

message: I give -- what needs to be cleaned up?  I didn't see anything listed on the clean up pages, and maybe I'm just dim, but nothing jumped out at me -- woefully incomplete, of course, but that is a concession to the shortness of life . . . . Lutanite 23:26, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article is just personal opinions from an occult enthusiast about the nature and meaning of a particular tarot card. No peer reviewed books or journal articles are cited. No references or footnotes are given. When a new statement is added, the source needs to be cited, and the source needs to be verifiable, and reliable. Waite is not an unbiased, factual source on the history or evolution of tarot cards. The work can be cited properly, however: "Waite's opinion in his book The Pictorial Key to the Tarot ... etc" The other sources are definitely of questionable academic weight.
The card in question has a history of over 500 years in European card games in which it is used as trump card (see Tarocchi). The article is unbalanced in that it only features the recent uses of the card for divination. This makes the article biased due to its recentism. Since the article ignores use of the card for game play in Europe and other parts of the world, it offers an anglo-american perspective that raises NPOV issues. There are academic sources and sources from international organizations discussing the history and evolution of the "Empress" card as well as its use in games. These need to be utilized. - Parsa 07:17, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unverifiable and unbalanced content 

message: What's the point in saying that the Japanese Empress is the only living empress today? That has no connection to this card, so I'm removing it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.217.140.34 (talk) 00:11, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useless and unrelated information 

message: What on earth is this? Googling it only resulted in many instances of the same piece of text, or parts of chat saying "ur poisoner, haha!" etc.84.249.77.153 (talk) 10:15, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ur-Poisoner? 
Talk:Labium (genitalia)

message: User:Anthopos removed the merge templates without discussion or consensus.  It would be polite to wait a week or so then take action.
My stand point is to support merge of the articles .
Mattopaedia 06:33, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Its been a week since I suggested merging labium and labia.  The only thing that's happened in that time was Anthopos removing the merge templates without warning or explanation.  I reverted that edit and since then there's been silence.  So I've made the decision & will merge labia into labium.  --Mattopaedia 00:25, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge discussion
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Sceptre

message: Call me optimistic, but I'm rather surprised that there hasn't been any of the usual opposition. Where are they? I know, as soon as I hit save page, there will be a neutral vote and 2 oppose. But nonetheless, everybody's happy. --Jay (Reply) 23:43, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: RfA Going Well
Talk:Oliver Hardy

message: After the LH and its sock IP"s edit the sentence in question reads "In fall of 1912, he signed up for a course or two at University of Georgia as a law major for fall semester just to play football." That means it has both grammar errors and a redundant mention of the fall of 1912. It looks like this is an English as a second language and WP:CIR problem. MarnetteD|Talk 19:48, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't really follow the entire edit history of that. What was the exact text before the odd edits and the socking started? Softlavender (talk) 02:18, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant 

message: MarnetteD, blatant vandal who started edit war wants to show off, i do not know why pathetic administrator materialscientist blocked this page from editting, he should have realized information is correct... blatant vandall marnetteD says fall is mentioned BUT IT'S NOT AND ONE CAN'T REASON WITH HIM... read history of his war edits, it's not same fall year, also correct death of oliver hardy's father was vandalized by him: november 22 1892, yet nobody cares, proving again wikipedia is joke of a "encyclopedia" where senior editors no matter how wrong they are they have their way and newbies are kicked out for any reason, but fine with me, go ahead keep on misleading the crowd... 186.128.61.209 (talk) 02:41, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fall semester for 1912 was mentioned twice, however instead of war-editting, marnetteD should have corrected the sentence, proper grammar is: In the Fall of 1912... 129.122.195.234 (talk) 02:50, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

text: Stop calling an editor that's been here for almost 20 years a vandal. Meanwhile you just started editing only to include that sentence.  Anyway, wouldn't a fall semester take place in...Fall? It's "not same fall year"?  What?  It seems like a little bit of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT and WP:COMPETENCE Mike Allen  13:24, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blatant Vandalism by marnetteD: Correct College Semester  & Correct Day of Death of Oliver's Father, Misleading Info...
Talk:Dev Benegal

message: University of New York?  I believe that might be New York University.   Could someone check it?--964267sr 23:55, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No one responded, so I gave him as much space as he deserves. Zora 05:18, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While there is something to be said about the vanity, there is still content which needs to remain. Please reincorporate that into the page, rather than throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Thanks, --Avillia 05:19, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Checked my Talk: If you feel that way, alright. Your call if there's been consensus. --Avillia 05:22, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vanity and content. 
Talk:Rob Roy (cocktail)

message: Rob Roys are usually served in Old Fashioned or Highball Glasses.
The traditional Robert Burns Cocktail was made with a dash of Absinthe instead of Drambuie. Pernod Ricard Pastis or Herbsaint are common replacements, but Bénédictine will do in a pinch. Hotspur23 19:51, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

message: The use of sweet vermouth should be mentioned in the actual text of the article. Also, is it red or white sweet vermouth? Badagnani 05:43, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of vermouth 

message: When I researched the Rob Roy looking for references, the top recipe sites spoke only of sweet or dry vermouth; none distinguished between red or white sweet vermouth. Maybe it doesn't matter. A vermouth site said that the red color is added, and that the same white grapes are used for both. You might experiment to see if there's a difference in taste.
I've never seen a Rob Roy made with red vermouth. I'm imagining that the light gold scotch might blend with a red vermouth to produce a festive warm rosy color. Calogera (talk) 16:08, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply to Use of Vermouth question

message: I just changed a big mistake, it was written incorrectly to use 2.5 ML of sweet vermouth, but it is not ml, it is cl, that's why I just deleted the dot to be 25 ml (2.5 cl) that's how it's on IBA's official cocktail website. - --Johav (talk) 03:57, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect receipt information 

message: I have removed this comment The Rob Roy owes its existence partially to the introduction of Dewar's Scotch Whisky to the United States because it is unsourced. I have been unable to find any verification of this. In fact, sources indicate that Dewar's only became popular in the late 1890s through the efforts of Tommy Dewar (years after the creation of the Rob Roy). The comment should not be re-added without reliable sourcing.  — CactusWriter (talk) 03:31, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No source
Talk:CHAM (AM)

message: Mere speculation on whether 820 will go talk again - where's the proof?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.198.151.52 (talk) 18:58, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 21:16, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: CHAM (radio station) →  – Radio stations in Canada should use this title format, see WP:RADIONAMING 162.208.168.92 (talk) 20:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

text: Support per above reasons. Stereorock (talk) 05:42, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

text: Support per nom.--Tdl1060 (talk) 20:43, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

text: Support. I missed the page move to the "radio station" title at the time it happened, as I didn't have this article watchlisted, but would have immediately stepped in to move it to the correct title myself if I'd seen it earlier. Bearcat (talk) 14:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 February 2021
Talk:Stregheria/Archive 01

message: As an outside who came at this page through anarchist symbols specifically the black cat, I'd love to see more than the single literary citation, and a proper citations list at the end. Fifelfoo 10:45, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Literary evidence 

message: First, most of this article is from Raven Grimassi's pseudohistory. Why must the author of this supposed encyclopedic entry pollute the internet with this nonsense? Second, some of the research and keyphrases have been "borrowed", to put it politely, from a piece I personally wrote at MysticWicks. (http://www.mysticwicks.com/showthread.php?t=67577)
I know there is no way of stopping internet plagiarism, but I write this because I was shocked to find this. Please read the original article, and you will see how the author of the "article" here has used textual manipulation to support the agenda of the tired, long-debunked Witch-Cult garbage.
If anyone has the authority to remove the above article, please do so.
:Thank you for your baseless accusations, insane ramblings, and trolling.  I doubt anyone here has ever even seen that "piece" you wrote, and none of this article is derived from anything written by Raven Grimassi except where explicitly stated, nor has anything on this page been "debunked".  Please seek psychiatric help immediately.  --Corvun 20:59, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Corvun, please modify your tone.  I have, in great detail above, expressed my own concerns about this article.  That said, having examined the thread that anon referenced, it's not clear to me what research has been "borrowed".  Anon, if you would point out more specifically what you feel to be a violation of your intellectual property, we can work on resolving the issue.  Wikipedia is absolutely concerned with avoiding plagiarism and with copyright issues, but I, at least, need some help finding it here.  Jkelly 21:10, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Anon, I appreciate the thought and time that went into the above, and I look forward to further discussion.  I'd like to strongly encourage you to set up an account here at Wikipedia (and sign your contributions to Talk pages).  I assume that you are the same anon as the one who began this section, but it's easier for everyone to follow a username rather than a few IP addresses.  See the welcome tag I left you at the Talk page of your first IP.  Jkelly 22:21, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  plagiarism and neo-pagan pseudohistory
Talk:Worli Fort

message: I'm moving the following text from the article page as it evidently belongs here on the talk page:
:: I went to visit the fort today. I had to find my way through the thousand or so illegal shanties that block the way to the fort. However, I was pleasantly surprised when I reached the fort. A chap called Danny along with his few mates have assumed the role of the keeper of the fort. They are running a gym inside it and also seemed to have kept the place in good shape with a reasonably recent looking coat of paint and the place looking very clean once you actually got inside the fort. He also claimed that he and his friends have managed to put a stop to rampant drinking that used to take place there.
::::added 2 weeks ago by an anonymous user
--BACbKA 00:22, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal account according to [[User:203.92.54.10]]

message: Worli fort information in English 103.211.115.206 (talk) 10:38, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:John R. Baylor

message: Is there any serious historical work that has been done on the Arizona Territory?evrik 00:21, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy 

message: Citations vary. I pasted in the draft edit by User:Ducknish stating that he was never charged, but left hidden inline the previous statement and citation stating that he was charged and acquitted. – Fayenatic London 09:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was he charged with murder?
Talk:Futures techniques

message: (abstracts)
Futurists use a diverse range of anticipatory methods including: 
* Wikipedia: Anticipatory thinking
** Causal Layered Analysis (CLA)
** Environmental scanning
** Morphological analysis
** Scenario method
** Delphi method
** Future history
** Monitoring
*** System analysis
*** Systems analysis
* Backcasting (Eco-History)
** Back-view mirror analysis
** Cross-impact analysis
* Futures workshops (Eco-Futures)
** Failure mode and effects analysis
** Futures biographies
** Futures wheel
** Relevance tree
* Simulation and modelling (Mindscapes)
** Memory-prediction framework
** Social network analysis
** Systems engineering
*** Thinklets
*** TRIZ
*** Visioning
* Trend analysis (Mentorship arts)
* Adaptive Role-Playing
-- RJBurkhart 01:34, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: -- geoWIZard-Passports 11:40, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Future studies]] techniques

message: can you please help me to find the component of pda device . and the future trends of pda development  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.226.200.72 (talk) 09:52, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  defining pda 
Talk:SingStar (PlayStation 2)

message: I was thinking that maybe since there are going to be more Singstar games released making this page the first game and basic base point for the singstar line but make separate entries for the other Singstar titles?  What d'ya reckon?Originalsinner 07:57, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's worth doing.. if each title is listed complete with information about the localised versions & their track listings, that's going to take a lot of space. Rb 16:58, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

text: What it means is that on the PS3 version you will be able to add more tracks via an iTunes like facility. and for the current releases there is no vocal cancellation. User:Annon 06:15, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 
Talk:Fealty

message: Fealty as a reciprocal act of the Lord to that vassal isn't emphasised. Linked from elsewhere a novice to hierarchical order would possibly miss this. In my opinion this is paramount to the idea of "fealty and homage".
nobody cares about this 
honestly this is useless--70.65.39.130 (talk) 18:08, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Vassal

message: Fealty/fidelitas is a word associated with 223.226.142.72 (talk) 05:06, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Solomonoff's theory of inductive inference

message: Shouldn't this entry be titled 'universal inductive inference', since there are many more models of inductive inference than the Solomonoff/AIT model? --Johnny Logic 05:54, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

message: The Minimum description length article is the right place for this.  But there is a persistent historical problem with the MDL article, due to decades-old historical abuses of the phrase "minimum description length".  That abuse must be remedied because it is actually poisoning not just machine learning/AI as a discipline but the practice of science, itself.  
My rewrite of the MDL article attempted to reduce the damage.  But the decades-old degenerate statistical notions once again took front-and-center priority in the article relegating the ideal MDL principle (algorithmic MDL) to an afterthought.  There is no excuse for giving priority to notions that are not only more specialized but less intuitive than the general notion.  The more specialized notions are quite reasonable to mention as specializations along with what they sacrifice.  In this case, statistics sacrifice rigorous causal inference from the data and lead to endless heated debates featuring such tropes as "correlation doesn't imply causation" applied selectively according to the bias of the participants in discourse.  
This problem is severe enough that it should be a high priority for Wikipedia to fix.  Its profound damage to society is due to the damage to science (not to mention machine learning) in the information age and, in particular, to the social sciences which are at the nexus of increasingly polarized conflict over which social theory shall set policy.  
The tendency to conflate "The MDL Principle" with model creation techniques, just as Solomonoff's proofs are so-conflated, is the proximate cause of this damage.  Both are actually model selection criteria.  The ultimate cause may be that people get confused by the fact that machine learning systems are "algorithmic" and then go from there to think that "algorithmic information" must be information that is created by algorithms, rather than information that is an algorithm.  People keep trying to automate model creation and in so doing they obviously need to apply the best and most rigorous model selection theory at hand, but the two are not the same!  
With statistical model selection criteria -- arising from such statistical notions as Bayesian Information Criterion (which is frequently equated with "MDL") -- elbowing out the the ideal Algorithmic Information Criterion for model selection (another name for the, unfortunately, mis-named Solomonoff "Induction"), we keep depriving science of its ideal.  This poison has been coursing through the veins of Moore's Law ever since the 1960s and fans of Rissanen are doing neither him nor themselves any favors -- let alone society at large.  Jim Bowery (talk) 00:16, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should probably be merged with Minimum Description Length
Talk:Wisbech Grammar School

message: old school. Alumni? refs? welcome Victuallers 13:13, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alumni

message: This article survived an AfD. The discussion can be found here. enochlau (talk) 00:39, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Afd

message: The article has listed Anton Rogers here for a long time, but although he was definitely born in Wisbech, I can't find any information about him having gone to this school. He died recently, and his obituary in The Times says that he went to Westminster School and then a stage school. A brief Google search brings up no definite results. It would be good to have it back in if it's true, though, as it's entirely possible. Did he ever write an autobiography? D. Lion West (talk) 17:53, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anton Rogers 

message: I've reviewed this article and jumped it's class to B. In fact with just a few small tweaks it could be a WP:GAC.--Kudpung (talk) 06:46, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Near GAC 

message: At present there is a discussion relating to the renaming of this category. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at this discussion page. Please note that the discussion is not a majority vote so contributions should be based on Wikipedia policies and independent sources. Cjc13 (talk) 14:16, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Wisbech Old Grammarians

message: I have proposed that Magdalene House  should be merged to here. Any comments appreciated. CalzGuy (talk) 18:34, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge school
Talk:Kavi

message: This comment :
:"Kavi (http://www.kavi.com) is also a company based in Portland, Oregon USA providing software-powered services for standards consortia and associations. They provide membership and collaboration software used by many non-profit technical standards organizations such as usb.org, snia.org, dmtf.org, etc."
Seems to be a spam. Please create a new article for this information and prove how it might be relevant.
::Ditto for this section:
:::KAVI Corporation is a company headquartered in San Francisco, California that manufactures skin care specializing in pore maintenance and the prevention of premature aging. The company was founded by Kaveh Alizadeh in 2001.
--ፈቃደ (ውይይት) 23:30, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 05:17, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-7 Automated pywikipediabot message
Talk:Get Up (R.E.M. song)

message: I'm stuck on how to describe this song without trotting out all the usual stuff, if someboday could help out here that would be great.OlderBrother 00:49, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: : This edit removes "bubblegum pop" (leaving the source for it) and adds "pop rock", citing a source (with a supporting quote).
The source left behind clearly supports "bubblegum pop".
The phrase "pop rock" is not in any of the sources.
The quote provided with the source is not in the source cited. - SummerPhDv2.0 08:01, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre, again 

message: Is 'alternative rock' an appropriate genre to add if there is a good source for it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimwagoner (talk • contribs) 00:45, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: With a good source, 'blacked Viking death metal' is an appropriate genre to add. - SummerPhDv2.0 02:25, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre Discussion