lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of lieutenant governors of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands

message: Note:  Project Banner with Andaman and Nicobar Islands workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Andaman and Nicobar Islands or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 05:41, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Andaman and Nicobar Islands workgroup Addition 

message: From Who Was Who:
*BROWNING, Lieut-Colonel Herbert Arrott ... Chief Commissioner, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, 1906–13
*HERBERT, Maj.-Gen. Lionel ... Chief Commissioner Andaman and Nicobar Islands, 1907–08
Herbert isn't listed anywhere else that I can see, but it seems odd that Who's Who would have let a claim like this slip through! Perhaps a temporary appointment? Andrew Gray (talk) 15:01, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double entry?
Talk:Schiphol Group

message: * German: http://content.schiphol.nl/info/miniguide/duits/willkommen/home.htm
* French: http://content.schiphol.nl/info/miniguide/frans/bienvenue/home.htm
* Chinese: http://content.schiphol.nl/info/miniguide/chinees/welkom/welkom.htm
WhisperToMe (talk) 15:54, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Info about Schiphol Group in other languages

message: Currently, Dick Benschop is listed as CEO. A quick Google search shows Ruud Sondag is currently CEO Zikloansyklus (talk) 13:58, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schiphol Group CEO
Talk:Schick (razors)

message: Why is there no reference to the original (electric) Schick razors? Schick made history and was market leader. And was strongly opposed to wet razors. (That's why he invented the dry electric one.) --Jhartmann (talk) 11:49, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jacob Schick 

message: This is a minor controversy, but so incredibly stupid it might be noteworthy.
Aside from some bewilderment on Twitter, a search for this disclaimer from their TV ads brings up this legal complaint (scroll way down) and this FTC decision.
Worth some sort of mention? InedibleHulk (talk) 03:40, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hydrates only during shaving"
Talk:Kalev (band)

message: This article has been marked for tone and lack of references since 2007. I copyedited the article and found an archive link for the one reference, but I could not find any reliable sources for the band. They recorded 3 singles, none of which won any notable prizes. There is supposed to be an article in Artrocker, but I couldn't find it online. Can anyone else improve this article or should it be deleted? Leschnei (talk) 00:44, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this article be deleted?
Talk:Scentura

message: I moved this from the main page to talk:
The court ruled:
I don't see how this is so important as to be added to the article. Maybe if it was worked into the paragraph itself instead? Calendar2 (talk) 15:28, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's relavent because this is the definition of a pyrmid sales scheme. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:41, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  quote from lawsuit judgement 

message: In this article, it looks like the term "Indepedent salespeople" is used about half the time, and "Scentura's salespeople" the other half.
Seems like any instance of "Scentura salespeople" should be changed to "Independent salespeople." The BBB report on Scentura shows that the company has 9 employees, and states "Scentura Creations only sells products to independent distributors." That, plus most of the references state that the sales people are all Independent.
Thoughts?
76.90.17.202 (talk) 04:38, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Whether the sales people are independent or not lies at the heart of the controversy here. "Independent salespeople" is absolutely the wrong term for them. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:50, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

text: Would it be possible to refer to them simply as "salespeople" without any modification? 69.42.17.116 (talk) 23:54, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scentura Salespeople 

message: Here's a news article about Scentura: http://www.scenturacreations.com/images/atlanta-business-chronicle-10-5-1987.pdf
Is this helpful at all? 76.90.17.202 (talk) 22:44, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: yes, thank you, the original "Who wants to be rich". We have information on this already, but it is great to have the original. Calendar2 (talk) 01:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  News Article 

message: Website appears to be offline, possibly due to domain expiration, as of a few minutes ago. --Shawn K. Quinn (talk) 23:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website gone?
Talk:Scandlines

message: Could that be 1,560 million as in 1.56 billion? 1.5 million for such a big business would've been dirt cheap. De728631 (talk) 20:28, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 acquisition 

message: The Scandlines company is old news. It has lately been merely a trademark used by the owning company HH Ferries Group for some years now. Today the company switched to the new ForSea name. CapnZapp (talk) 15:02, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scandlines >> HH Ferries >> ForSea 
Talk:Sbarro (automobile)

message: This English article is only about the cars made by Franco Sbarro, there's no info on the person Franco Sbarro. The French-language Wiki has separate articles on the person and on the company or school (are they the same?) We should also check the Italian and German articles before deciding what to do. I could make a draft translation from French to English but have no experience setting up or finalizing an article, or starting a translation of an article, and someone should review my translation. Ideas?
The translations linking page of 'Sbarro' also shows this mix-up of 'person' and 'company'.
Jacosi (talk) 12:54, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unmix the articles on the person and the cars? 

message: Missing SUV 4x4 and 6x6 models Windhound 1978 which was produced in a small serie and Windhawk for Saudi. And fun off roader Monster G and the VW Golf/Rabbit conversion on a Porsche 928. 46.126.108.188 (talk) 09:04, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing SUV 4x4 and 6x6 models
Talk:Elisa Saunalahti

message: Saunalahti offered a FON- and Tomizone-alike WiFi-sharing project called Wippies. See http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wippies. This gotta be included in the article, as well as the row between Saunalahti and Elisa.net. 83.83.119.239 (talk) 01:37, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wippies 

message: A paid editor made contributions to this article, and has disclosed that fact on this page, therefore the paid contributions template is a matter of fact and does not require discussion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 13:30, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the policy "if you place the Paid tag, you should promptly start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what is non-neutral about the article." As a paid editor I'm not allowed to remove the tag myself, but if any volunteer editor thinks that the neutral point of view of the article is ok, they are free to remove the tag as told in the Template:Paid contributions instructions: "If you do not start this discussion, then any editor is justified in removing the tag without warning."Jjanhone (talk) 16:59, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

text: I removed paid contributions tag after checking that the article didn't contain any problematic content from those edits. --Zache (talk) 12:52, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Paid contributions tag
Talk:Sangean

message: "Sangean has been awarded several electronics industry prizes for its products."
Ha! I'd like to see some citations or other evidence.  I just completed analysis of a Sangean CCRadio, manufactured for C. Crane Co. of Fortuna, California.  Typical of this type, the LCD display had failed.  Upon opening it up I found it to be a disposable $15 radio that was heavily marketed and sold for $165.  Utterly unrepairable and total junk.  Accordingly, I tagged the statement for lack of citations. —QuicksilverT @ 01:49, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prizes awarded?
Talk:Andhra State

message: What is this? Does it still exist? Is it now Andhra Pradesh? --AW 17:18, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I clarified it --AW 17:20, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the article just support to madras for andra.. and sid that madras is telugu... is that really? no one agree? where is the link and citation for that? other wise delete this page?
This article also does not Talk about Satyavedu Taluk and Tiruttani taluk which were transferred between each other and Villages from Salem district given to Andhra.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dineshpkm (talk • contribs) 10:38, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  supporting to ONE side 
Talk:Sanford Health

message: The huge timeline section has absolutely no citations. For a not particularly notable company, I think this section is far, far too detailed, and should either be cut down to key events or removed completely.  MrAureliusRTalk! 21:05, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone ahead and removed it for now. It is just so ugly and horribly formatted, and with no citations at all.  MrAureliusRTalk! 21:07, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huge Timeline 

message: Cab you advise me who to contact about ab illegal rent increase at Good Samaritan, lane Forest in Dentin Tx. 172.108.177.18 (talk) 17:01, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rent increase
Talk:Sandman Hotels

message: Let's keep this article very neutral. It's an Encyclopedia. Company press-release type wording isn't really appropriate. Saying "The Inns offer the most affordable lodging tier" and "Sandman Signature will marry Sandman’s legendary service" are highly inappropriate for an encylopedia. There's no factual information to backup any of these statements. 
--Mezaco (talk) 23:18, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Has happened again with a corporate edit to appear like a press-release. Edited to remove POV. --Mezaco (talk) 22:00, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a Business Directory
Talk:San Diego Gas & Electric

message: To improve the history section of the article, can anyone elaborate on the caption of this photo? The electric arc tower appears to be on the west side of Fifth Avenue, perhaps around Broadway. Was it a practical means of lighting, or more in the way of a stunt or advertisement? Was it a one-off, or was there a network of such towers around town? --Worldbruce (talk) 05:24, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  San Diego electric arc tower in 1887
Talk:Samsonite

message: It looks like someone from Samsonite changed this article on Nov 26.  It looks like user:moveconvertible is a Marketing person for them possibly?
50.132.79.11 (talk) 23:50, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed the following purported gallery which displays nothing.  Please edit section to see it all.  The text is advertorial IMO Chrismorey (talk) 21:12, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Empty gallery 

message: I removed the following line from the main article as there is no prior reference to, explanation of, or citation in reference to "Taif" anywhere else in the article. Google tells me it's a city in Saudi Arabia. Can anyone provide a reason why this should remain in the article?
"Samsonite had offices in Taif for 13 years." (65.206.16.35 (talk) 16:37, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taif 

message: It says Samsonite is an American company. Yet their home office is now in Luxembourg, and they're on the HK stock exchange? Doesn't sound American at all to me.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.2.138.109 (talk) 20:52, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed "American" from the Short description too. --Jhertel (talk) 13:32, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  American? 

message: This section seems promotional and unnecessary. It also lacks sourcing. Planning to remove unless anyone feels differently. Jmbld (talk) 05:30, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Senior Leadership
Talk:Sample sale

message: There is way too much advertisement in this article. Can someone do anything about it? 83.86.164.97 (talk) 13:44, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Complaint

message: as described in the entry, this is a term used in NYC and LA, but I've lived throughout upstate NY for decades where this isn't a term, and at least 10 other states and major cities. This isn't a term I've ever encountered in Chicago, Honolulu, Denver, the Twin Cities, Atlanta, Orlando, Tampa, any of the major cities in Texas... I don't know if this is worth a page, or just needs to be clarified that it's only really a thing in NYC and LA. 2603:800C:3D00:1ED2:F9ED:FF0C:E11E:A2EC (talk) 07:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extremely localized term
Talk:Samoa Breweries

message: Nature of vailima company 203.99.159.200 (talk) 08:44, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economic
Talk:Sally Corporation

message: I have uploaded an image of the LBJ animatronic manufactured by Sally Corporation on Wikimedia Commons and
am trying to add it to this article. 
However, there doesn't seem to be enough room. Can you help?Margaretwmiller (talk) 21:38, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  trouble adding photo to this page 
Talk:Saleen Special Vehicles

message: The article mixes past and present. It says "Saleen Special Vehicles or SSV, was a Saleen-owned...." And later states "SSV houses a multitude of specialty facilities..." I don't have the knowledge to correct this, but either the SSV facility is still in operation or it isn't.ExpatSalopian (talk) 03:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past or Present?
Talk:Saisho

message: Saisho was not rebranded to Advent. Advent is the computer and laptop own brand sold in Dixons Group Stores. Saisho became the brand we know as Matsui today..
Incorrect, Saisho was a Currys own brand, before Dixons bought them. Matsui was Dixon's own brand. The Dixons Stores Group (not Dixons Group Stores) was not formed until Currys were merged with Dixons, to actually form a group. I don't know if someone wants to correct it or not? I don't feel that I should 81.103.184.129 (talk) 23:34, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

message: When I worked for them (MANY years ago) SAISHO was Curry's own brand, MATSUI was Dixon's own brand, and Advent was used for PC kit.Lanzarotemaps (talk) 22:57, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saisho / Matsui / Advent
Talk:City of Bristol College

message: A large amount  of purely  promotional content  has been removed, along with  empty  sections. The effort is to maintain neutrality and clean formatting. Students should not  be named, and if the awards in  the  awards section are for individual  students, they  cannot  be claimed as awards for the school and should be removed. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:32, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned up
Talk:RWE

message: RWE sometimes refers to Ralph Waldo Emerson (, ).  Can someone disambiguate it please?  I would prefer we move this article and make RWE a disambiguation page, but if this does not have consensus, or until then, can someone place a disambig at the top of this page please.  167.30.61.13 (talk) 05:19, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Dab page created, hatnote added at the top of this article. Gr1st (talk) 19:01, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ralph Waldo Emerson 
Talk:Russo-Balt

message: The year the company was founded (1984) is later than the year it became defunct (1923). Elfalem (talk) 09:42, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong years 

message: There was maybe some ambiguity and definitely an objectionable edit related to who left for France.  I unwound and corrected it in a way that also may reduce ambiguity.  (It's all sourced or source-able, with no ambiguity about the actual facts to my knowledge.)  Thank you Jusdafax for seeing the objectionable edit before and reverting it but it had to be done again.
I removed a bulleted list of aircraft and put it inline in the text. The resulting text is very dense; I think it's basically better than in a list but could go either way. If anyone has nice online sources on the Russian military squadron EVK of WWI or Mr Shidlovsky it would be good to link to those. I'm sure there's some in Russian, which I can't read. Econterms (talk) 11:23, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  update July 2010 re Sikorsky and Shidlovsky 

message: Russo Balt had also constructed an airship in 1915
http://i63.tinypic.com/34y8ied.jpg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:7C05:4000:D17D:780:14BB:B518 (talk) 20:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  a notice
Talk:Russell Stover Candies

message: This article states that Russell Stover Candies was formed after being forced out of business with the Eskimo Pie endeavor.  Eskimo Pie states that the Eskimo Pie was produced through a partnership with Russell Stover Candies.  I am fairly sure, from the description at the Smithsonian Archives, that this page has the correct version of the history.  The Eskimo Pie was produced by a partnership between Nelson and Stover as the Eskimo Pie Corporation, and Russell Stover Candies did not exist until at least 1922, when Stover sold his stock in Eskimo Pie.  Since this article almost completely lacks sources, I can't say for sure when it was formed, though. 
Because this article appears to be the most accurate, I will be editing Eskimo Pie to agreee with this article.  I am mentioning it on the talk page here because of the inseperably related topic. BecauseWhy? (talk) 19:51, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  An inconsistency between this article and [[Eskimo Pie]] - 8 July 2008
Talk:Russell Simmons Music Group

message: Merge to Russell Simmons; This article seems outdated and with no source so I think it needs to be merged into the target founder. Darrion "Beans" Brown 🙂 (my talk page / my sandbox) 06:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Support merge. Joyous! | Talk 11:02, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Support merge. Caramelo77 (talk) 12:29, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

text: I have successfully completed the merge Caramelo77 (talk) 12:44, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger discussion
Talk:South Gloucestershire and Stroud College

message: The infobox and coordinates only cover the location at Filton.  It really should cover Stroud as well.  Any suggestions as to how this would best be done, to cause minimum confusion?  Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:55, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location in infobox 

message: There's a new Ofsted report, which should be summarised in the appropriate section. (I can't, I'm an employee). --rbrwr± 12:13, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ofsted 
Talk:Rumbelows

message: This article is wrong.  And it's not unusual.
Rumbelows was not founded by Fred Dawes.
The company was a conglomeration of several others.
Fred Dawes (founded by Fred Dawes) and Vernon Cooper (founded by Vernon Cooper) joined together first.
Sydney Rumbelows (the founder of Rumbelows) was bought by Thorn.
Fred Dawes (founded by Fred Dawes) and Vernon Cooper (founded by Vernon Cooper) was also bought by Thorn.
Thorn called the formed 'group' Rumbelows.
It follows that either Sydney Rumbelow founded Rumbelows or Thorn founded Rumbelows.
Something like that.  But it's still wrong!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.25.89.178 (talk) 18:39, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's Wrong  (again!) 

message: Rumbelows is mentioned in the 1990s BBC comedy Bottom where Richie bypasses Rumbelows for 3 months and takes the £86 in back rent to Dr. O'Gradies Personal Organ Enchancement clinic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.143.221.194 (talk) 19:01, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Popular Culture
Talk:Royal Typewriter Company

message: The tenses of this article need to be improved upon. Talking about things that are in the past although they are in the future is not proper grammar. This would not take long to do and I may come back to it. Perhaps someone who has more of an interest in this subject could take on this project though.  David Marshall B.Ed. (talk) 08:02, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tenses of page need to be improved upon
Talk:Royal Purple (lubricant manufacturer)

message: Because this page had a rewrite request, and because of the edit war, I'm rewriting the whole thing.  Regardless of the validity of the Mobil 1 claim, a competing product shouldn't be mentioned here. So strictly on that basis, it won't be included.  Also removed the recitation of the companies products and their alleged benefits and replaced it with neutral language.   The article will be expanded as time permits. NoHenry (talk) 23:47, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Royal Oak Mines

message: This information is misleading and inaccurate based on the NWT Supreme Court decision was overturned by the NWT Court of Appeal in 2008 NWTCA 04, which has been heard but a decision not rendered by the Supreme Court of Canada. Canadian Copy Editor (talk) 04:44, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Current court proceedings require updating

message: I prefer to use the term "replacement workers" over "strikebreakers" as the latter has a negative connotation to it (as recognized by [LabourWatch.com]. In addition, the Courts prefer the use of the term "replacement worker" as evidenced by Fullowka v. Royal OAk Ventures Inc. (2008 NWTCA). Canadian Copy Editor (talk) 05:46, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's still a corporatism, i.e. a euphemism and strikebreaker is the most common usage; ("scab" is the truly negative term); language preferred by the courts is not most common usage....note my inline comment about the riot squad of 300 Pinkerton's that led an assault on the mine, that should be in here, must be press copy online about it somewhere; I remember watching the footage clear as a bell.Skookum1 (talk) 12:53, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Replacement Workers" vs. "Strikebreakers"
Talk:Royal African Company

message: So why exactly did they want to start the Second Anglo-Dutch War?--Streona (talk) 10:02, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: WHY?

message: The article on Prince Rupert of the Rhine mentions the Royal Society among the backers. I'd consider it notable enough to be included here, too, if there are any good sources. --Ehitaja (talk) 10:21, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal Society
Talk:Roussel Uclaf

message: I believe they're not in Romainville any more ... Daen (talk) 13:32, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You might be right. There is a picture on Wikipedia Commons that shows the corporation hq in Paris. --ACRSM 18:31, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Location?