Talk:Garden

message: I organized the article to try and not blend the distinction between garden and gardening. I feel that this article is okay and focuses a lot on the different types of gardens, which is okay, because the word garden is a broad term in this sense.  Hreynolds16 (talk) 03:56, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Further, the redirects could do with some cleanup.  "Residential gardening" is linked here, but redirects back to the same article, "Garden".  "Gardener" redirects to "gardening", not totally unexpected, but surely a couple of paragraphs can be written on the profession, there have been historical gardners and pioneering gardener, not to mention that we now have lifestyle and celebrity gardeners as well. Quill 22:54, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Garden design and __designer link to landscape architect.  Did someone intend to create specialized entries wrt garden design?  Otherwise, I'm going to edit the links.  Quill 01:09, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  garden design? 

message: Just making a random comment: This article is very impressive. It's direct, to the point, clean, and pretty (definitely a plus). Good job, those of you who maintained it. Riffraffselbow 02:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good job! 

message: Ode to Garden is inappropriate under WP:Vandalism. But you are free to discuss it here on the talk page.Berean Hunter (talk) 23:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  vandalism in article 

message: I propose that The Gardens in Literature section be removed and a further reading section created. Only the first listing from the previous section would be preserved. The section currently resembles a *Gardens in Pop culture* section where any work that uses the word 'garden' can get entry...it has absolutely no relevance...the 'gardens' are fiction and convey nothing useful to this article.
What do you think?  Berean Hunter (talk) 11:59, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose removing *Gardens in Literature* section 

message: Can anyone please upload a picture of a garden from Iran? Persian gardens have a long history -> see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persian_garden
'The desire to enrich the City of Geneva's cultural and botanical patrimony by giving it a Persian Garden was born three years ago. Particularly suited to Geneva's international role and reputation, the Persian Garden symbolizes peace and harmony.
 
The conception and planning of this public Garden has had to take into account the precise aesthetics of traditional Persian Gardens. Accordingly, the Persian Garden of Geneva Association has been advised by specialists in the fields of Architecture, Landscaping and Horticulture from around the world.
 
UNESCO has defined this Persian Garden Project as a symbol of peace and love, overcoming political and cultural barriers. 
http://www.payvand.com/news/10/mar/1032.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ditc (talk • contribs) 04:30, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Persian Garden 

message: Can anyone add a gardening resource web site?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.12.14.250 (talk) 06:48, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It depends on what you mean. WP:EL describes how Wikipedia deals with links to other websites, and we normally would not link to commercial sites. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:08, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gardening resources 

message: The page contains too many photographs. While that may not be such a bad thing, but it breaks formatting in the garden design subsection. Should these be removed, or someone with more formatting knowledge fix it? Shikhin (talk) 12:07, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a tough question as to just how many are enough. I'm disinclined to move them into a gallery. Two new photos were just added today, so I just now reverted those because of your comment. I also moved two images that were in the lead down slightly, so that they wouldn't spill across the boundary with the design section – does that help for your display? For this particular page, it probably makes sense to have more photos than most other pages have. What do other editors think? --Tryptofish (talk) 21:48, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the formatting is fixed as of now. However, having so many images on the right seems a little disconcerting to me. It would perhaps be better if > than half of them are moved into a gallery? Shikhin (talk) 03:42, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many photos? 

message: Two questions not well addressed by this article (to which I do not know answers): 1. Which cultures and nations have gardens, for how long (historically), and among which classes of people?  2. Why do gardens exist? (Obviously only a summary of analysis with references in the article.) RPTB1 (talk) 15:58, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History and sociology 

message: I'm curious as to the logic of removing lasagna gardens from the types of gardens. How do you differentiate between types and techniques? A squash garden could be considered a different type than a tomato garden. Also, a sacred garden or zen garden could obviously be grown, or arranged, for different reasons than a simple vegetable garden, and therefore considered different types. I see your point there. If you remove garden types because they are a technique, would you also need to remove square foot garden, rain garden, etc? After all, a rain garden could be the exact same style or 'type' as any other garden, however it is watered by rain collection rather than irrigation or some other means. Does that mean it is a different technique? I would think so. A square foot garden is just a small technique, no?
I think of a lasagna garden being a very different type of garden as the composition of the garden material is quite different than all other gardening types, much like hydroponic gardening. 
Could you explain to me how you see the difference between type and technique when it comes to gardening, and whether or not lasagna gardening is considered a valid type?
Thanks! Richhersey (talk) 18:42, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The distinction between types and techniques is perhaps not an absolute one, but I decided to remove your addition of 'Lasagna garden' from the list of types because it seemed to me to be primarily a technique which could be employed in many gardens. Also the term 'Lasagna gardening' currently redirects to Sheet mulching, which I wouldn't regard as a 'type' of garden. Some of the other entries under 'garden types' could perhaps also be removed. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 19:52, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Would it, perhaps, improve the page if both types and techniques were separated and listed? I can see your point, and perhaps Sheet mulching, Rain garden, and others should be listed under varying techniques, rather than removed. I think knowing about different gardening techniques certainly contributes to this article. Would you agree? Rich  20:11, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is rather basic at the moment, and has potential to expand significantly, in which case including gardening techniques would make the article too long, in my view. I think it would be more logical and apposite to place techniques within the Gardening article - which I notice also has a 'Types' section, just to blur things even more... Both articles probably need a bit of attention to ensure information is in the most appropriate place. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 21:02, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Types of gardens 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Garden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100213101107/http://www.yourdictionary.com:80/library/garden.html to http://www.yourdictionary.com/library/garden.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello, 
I just wanted to let everyone know that I am a student and am task with the assignment of editing an article and was just going to do some copy edits and structural edits. I agree with most of your comments and understand to be careful between the fine line of garden and gardening.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hreynolds16 (talk • contribs) 16:45, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gardening Editing 

message: Hello all! 
This article has been chosen as this week's effort for WP:Discord's #team-b-vital channel, a collaborate effort to bring Stub and Start class Vital articles up to a B class if possible, similar to WP:Articles for Improvement. This effort will run for up to seven days, ending early if the article is felt to be at B-class or impossible to further improve. Articles are chosen by a quick vote among interested chatters, with the goal of working together on interesting Vital articles that need improving. This is the fifth article chosen.
Thank you! -- ferret (talk) 20:24, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team-B-Vital Improvement Drive 

message: Garden matter in english 103.44.13.82 (talk) 15:24, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science 7th class