Talk:Souhegan High School

message: Hello all, and thank you for contributing to this school site. I'm part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment team, and, as it has recently been editted, then I'm reviewing this page. I'm currently giving it a grade of stub on the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale and an importance of Low on this importance scale.
My reasoning is as follows: This article is minimal at present so it is obviously a stub.... more may reveal an upgrade to its importance. Hope this helps Victuallers 19:06, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  March 2007 

message: Please build a section for the JRP & Senior project and try to clean up this page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.68.58.67 (talk) 23:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  JRP & Senior project 

message: Hi, I have noticed that the enrollment information on Wikipedia is inconsistent. Someone needs to find out what the real numbers are because the information in the artcile is contradictory and seems to be different every time I visit.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lifelonglego (talk • contribs) 19:29, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enrollment & Staff 

message: I am assessing this article for WikiProject Schools following a request. Firstly, I maintaining the current low-importance rating since there is not sufficient evidence for higher importance. This article is clearly no longer a stub, so I'm upping the quality rating to start-class, however significant further work is needed before a higher rating than this can be justified.
The content of the article firstly needs a significant clean-up and review. The article sections should be re-formatted to fit better into the standard for school articles - see WP:WPSCH/AG#S. Significant parts of the content, particularly "Operations" onwards, are not appropriate for an encyclopedia. Examples include mission statements and excessive information only of interest to staff or students e.g. discipline statistics. Project consensus has determined in detail what content should not be included in a school article, and the full list can be found at WP:WPSCH/AG#WNTI.
While it is good to have some references, significantly more are needed, and large parts of the article are completely unsourced. One section that is referenced, the history section, should use citation templates when possible, and I would advise against using ibid with the Wikipedia referencing system allowing reference order to easily change. Any section about controversy should be well referenced and cite sources from both sides of the issue with appropriate weight - the "Security controversy" section doesn't do this presently.
Finally, I would suggest lightning up the page if possible. It is standard practice to have the school logo in the infobox, usually uploaded as non-free content. Furthermore, if possible, someone should take some pictures of the school (with a camera; not just taken off random websites) and upload them to Wikimedia Commons for use in the article. CT Cooper · talk 18:32, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: Significant portions and sections of this page have been deleted within the last year (2019-2020). There were extensive sections that described the high school history that were deleted. These should be fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wutzu9 (talk • contribs) 16:56, January 24, 2021 (UTC)
:See  for this user's post about this on my talk page, and my reply  explaining WP:COI and WP:OWN, and pointing to WP:POLITICIAN. Meters (talk) 17:43, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion