Talk:Dignitatis humanae

message: Perhaps something of the history of the document's controversy ought to be added?
-----
I will be posting a variety of notes on this document derived from research I did on a recent paper so it will be under construction for a while. Claude Muncey
 [23 April 2005]
-----
I have corrected some minor slips and such, made some useful identifications and links such as Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, which was only identified as "Unity" and introducing useful Main article:... headings to some sections for further support and depth. The introduction needed adjusting to bring it better into line with the history of ideas, but I made no changes that aren't mainstream. --Wetman 22:24, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: I realise that putting an NPOV heading appears quite aggressive, and I want to make sure that no one feels that this is the case.  I feel that there are a number of assumptions in this article that need to be dealt with:
* While it deals with the liberal view in quite a lot of detail the traditionalist view, especially the traditionalist criticisms during and after the council, is given less room.
* The Conservative Catholic (as opposed to Trad) view that Dignitatis was not a substantial change in Catholic teaching is not dealt with
* John Courtney Murray is treated as the central figure giving a perritus centric view
I'm not saying that the bias is deliberate, and for that reason I was rather unwilling to put on the tag, but as I will hopefully be editing this article in some depth it is best that the motives for the edits are telegraphed in advance and that misunderstandings are avoided.
JASpencer 13:03, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that there have been no substantial changes to the article in the year it's been tagged for POV, and that there has been no further discussion of the issue. Since the tagger has failed to make any changes to address the issue and no other supporters have stepped forward, I suggest the POV tag be removed. Phyesalis 05:28, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree ClaudeMuncey 05:57, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the tag.--Alabamaboy 01:21, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV tag 

message: The two Church documents have often been contrasted by supporters and opponents of the encyclical. It should be mentioned as to how Dignitatis Humanae related to contraception and abortion. ADM (talk) 17:01, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dignitatis Humanae and Humanae Vitae

message: Some dissertation on the impact of Dignitatis Humanae with regards to Christian-Islam relations would also be welcomed. After all, Christian proselytism is still forbidden in the majority of Islamic countries, and converts to Christianity may be executed. Other countries such as Russia, India, Israel, Spain, Mexico, France, Vietnam and China have at times been problematic with regards to religious freedom, as defined by the conciliar document. ADM (talk) 06:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dignitatis Humanae and Islam

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Dignitatis humanae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120211202206/http://www.vatican.va:80/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651207_dignitatis-humanae_en.html to http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651207_dignitatis-humanae_en.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070904074425/http://www.stjames-cathedral.org:80/Prayer/vatican2-4.htm to http://www.stjames-cathedral.org/Prayer/vatican2-4.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120211202206/http://www.vatican.va:80/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651207_dignitatis-humanae_en.html to http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651207_dignitatis-humanae_en.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:48, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article currently states:
:The result was that as of the mid-20th century, an example of Catholic church–state relations was the Catholic situation in Spain (nacionalcatolicismo), where the Catholic Church:
*was officially recognized and protected by the state,
*had substantial control over social policy, and
*had this relationship explicitly set out in a concordat.
Well, yes, it was "an" example, but it would be preferable to explain that to some in the Catholic Church, it was seen as a particularly good example from the Church's point of view as of, say, 1953 (when the Concordat of 1953 with Spain was adopted). What term can we use other than "an example" to indicate that some in the Church wanted to see more countries treat the Church like Spain did? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 23:46, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "An example"