Talk:T-54/T-55 operators and variants

message: :Image:Serbian T55H upgrade.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:44, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Serbian T55H upgrade.JPG

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests May 2011 
;What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:00, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Flag of the Amal Movement.svg Nominated for Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions 
;What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:28, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Flag of the South Lebanon Army.svg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:43, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:TZI-JVBT.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:08, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:T-55AGM.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:24, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Bosnian Serb T-55 with a turret from the M18.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on T-54/55 operators and variants. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100710040550/http://www.osce.org:80/item/43568.html to http://www.osce.org/item/43568.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on T-54/55 operators and variants. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20141221081900/http://www.dhztt.sk/en/Gallery/Technique/SPOT.html to http://www.dhztt.sk/en/Gallery/Technique/SPOT.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on T-54/T-55 operators and variants. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080824014202/http://www.tau.ac.il/jcss/balance/Iraq.pdf to http://www.tau.ac.il/jcss/balance/Iraq.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100209012607/http://www.armyrecognition.com/libya/libya_libyan_modern_army_land_ground_forces_military_equipment_armoured_vehicle_information_descript.html to http://www.armyrecognition.com/libya/libya_libyan_modern_army_land_ground_forces_military_equipment_armoured_vehicle_information_descript.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/india/t-55.htm
Any other sources about this Indian modernization? FSbiran (talk) 15:28, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  indian modernization 

message: Oryx (website) at this writing reports that Russian has lost 1 T-54-3M (a subvariant not identified in the article's entry on the T54-3) and 2 T-55As (in addition to two "Unknown T-54/55" tanks) in the invasion of Ukraine.
The https://oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/attack-on-europe-documenting-equipment.html page changes constantly but shows every identified lost tank in a link so I think the implication in Russia's entry as an operator that the service of Russian T-54/5s in Ukraine is only a rumor should be corrected.
71.105.190.227 (talk) 06:35, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian use of T-54s & T-55s in Ukraine