lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Karl Friedrich Schinkel

message: A source mentions Saeltzer as his pupil. Does anyone have any information related to this? Candleabracadabra (talk) 15:38, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Connection to Alexander Saeltzer?

message: It has been speculated, however, that due to the difficult political circumstances – French occupation and the dependency on the Prussian king – and his relatively early death, which prevented him from seeing the explosive German industrialization in the second half of the 19th century, he was not able to live up to the true potential exhibited by his sketches.
How would dependency on the King harm his oeuvre ?  Most artists in any medium would kill for a rich, sympathetic patron.
In an industrial republic artists are not highly valued. Claverhouse (talk) 02:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dependency 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Karl Friedrich Schinkel - Schloß am Strom - Google Art Project.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for August 27, 2020. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2020-08-27. Any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be made before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:48, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Karl Friedrich Schinkel - Schloß am Strom - Google Art Project.jpg]] scheduled for POTD
Talk:Balthasar Neumann

message: This really should be of "High-Importance" on the assessment scale.  My introduction to Architecture at Stanford years ago presented Vierzehnheiligen as THE crowning work of the Baroque.  Vierzehnheiligen and the New Residence indicate his importance.--CSvBibra 00:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance
Talk:Paul Troost

message: It appears to have been at a late age (he was 42) if in 1920 become employed by an architect after finishing his architectural education at Technical College - 1902 would have sounded more likely as he would be in early 20s. I also suspect a typo in that he is stated to have designed internal decor for a passenger shipping line 'before World War I' (occurred 1914-18) 'after [my emphasis] a trip to the United States in 1922'.Cloptonson (talk) 12:44, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Suspected inaccuracies/typos
Talk:Erich Mendelsohn

message: the macquarie dictionary in australia has the spelling of this architect's name as Erich (or Eric) Mendlesohn - note the inversion of the L and E02:40, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If so, that would be a nearly unique spelling of this surname. - Jmabel | Talk 22:56, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Surname

message: Why is it explicitly mentioned that he was Jewish? It's not relevant, I think. Apparently, he didn't belong to the Ashkenazy community or had a typical Jewish education.
Fucking cunt ruined architecture — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:48f8:1001::ed3 (talk • contribs) 20:53, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish 

message: ovA_165443 (talk) 23:28, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy
Talk:Robert Koldewey

message: Koldewey excavated something he thought could have been a foundation or structure relating to the Hanging Gardens - but there is absolutely no evidence that it was. There's no real evidence that it even actually existed, apart from the references in a few Greek works.
The article should be structured more around Koldewey's work at Babylon and other sites, like the important North Syrian site of Zincirli. Leave out the sensational "Hanging Gardens" stuff. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 136.152.136.119 (talk) 07:40, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Building this article around the "Hanging Gardens" is nonsense 
Talk:Albert Heilmann

message: Speedy deletion was challenged. Subject is an architect, who is claimed to have worked on the Berlin Europahaus (despite there being no mention of him in that article. Architects do not automatically become notable by working on a construction project (which, after all, is their job). Heilman's article is sourced to some photos of him. Book(s) listed are authored by Heilmann (authors are not automatically notable either). Sionk (talk) 12:35, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-notable
Talk:Wilhelm Dörpfeld

message: Is there some special reason that the second letter in his family name is written with an unusual u (that looks like a Cyrillic ts), at least on my computer?Kdammers (talk) 07:45, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  unusual u 

message: One of Dörpfeld's nephews was the famous philosopher, Rudolf Carnap.  Reference is on Carnap's page. --Nixin06 (talk) 05:45, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nephew
Talk:Tempest (UK band)

message: Tempest is notable because most of its members are notable, especially Holdsworth.  Tempest filled the gap between Colosseum amd Colosseum II for Hiseman, and this collaboration with Holdsworth marks a link between prog rock lines.  As a result, several pages were red-linked to this one, so I was trying to tie up the loose ends.  This page also distinguishes this band from another of the same name, to which at least one article related to this band was erroneously linked.  Delete if you like, but you'll re-create those loose ends and confusion between bands.  Laszlo Panaflex 13:03, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable
Talk:Hermann Giesler

message: Literature and reference taken from: de.wikipedia.org/Hermann Giesler. Also, translation of 3 passages:
Giesler was joined in 1941 for the Organisation Todt (OT): as head of the "Assembly for the Baltic States Giesler", as head of the Einsatzgruppe Russia North of the OT (1942-1944), and as Director of the OT-Einsatzgruppe VI (Bavaria and Danube gaue). As such, he had the be responsible supervision for those of concentration camp prisoners built armor factory (1944-1945).In August 1943, he became a member of the Reichstag.
In 1945, Giesler from the US military was initially arrested and interned as a NAZI charged until 1946.1947 by a U.S. military court was indicted for killing crimes in the concentration camp Mühldorf main proceedings in Dachau and sentenced. 
Hermann Giesler was sentenced to life imprisonment, but on May 6, 1948 his sentence to 25 years in prison was reduced, prison on 7 July 1951 to 12 years. Giesler was however sacked on October 18, 1952. He settled in Düsseldorf, where he worked and died in 1987 in 1953 as an independent architect and author.Giesler saw his autobiographical writings, which appeared both in right-wing publishers (see below), as a commitment to Nazism and Adolf Hitler.Valleyspring (talk) 04:53, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bruno Taut

message: It is incorrect to say Le Corbusiers houses in Stuttgart were pure white, they used a variety of colours, green, blue, brown, though far more subtle than Taut, of course. Le Corbusier used colours to emphasise form, rather than Taut who used them for other reasons. Sionk (talk) 18:07, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiessenhofseidlung

message: I attempted some copyediting and slight re-structuring. Someone apparently entered some information from Turkish sources which I tried to incorporate (and grammar/spell check) best as I could without any knowledge about the topic at hand. I hope it helped. The citations and sources are still a mess though...SpookyFM (talk) 10:07, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: To be honest I preferred the previous wording, overall. Though obviously requesting inline citations for quotes is a good idea. If you've no knowledge of the subject I don't see how you can change "received training in" to "came in contact with", for example. I'm not sure why you removed the sourced penultimate paragraph either. Sionk (talk) 15:35, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyediting 

message: Taut was said to be Jewish since around 2020 in Turkish media. I found this link saying he was neither Jewish nor of Jewish heritage: https://archiv.pressestelle.tu-berlin.de/doku/200jahre/ausstellung/2.etage/flure/nr.20/nr20.8a.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.48.164.1 (talk) 15:54, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewishness
Talk:Paul Schultze-Naumburg

message: Die Kunst der Deutschen. Ihr Wesen und ihre Werke (The art of the Germans. Their nature and their 
factories)
 
Die Kunst der Deutschen. Ihr Wesen und ihre Werke (The art of the Germans. Their nature and their work or opus)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.4.36.56 (talk) 07:51, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  title translation
Talk:Friedrich Gilly

message: A free use image of the bust of him would be useful. Neddyseagoon - talk 09:26, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Street fair

message: I see this article got a delete a nanosecond after I started.  Please hold on!  There are 245 articles that have the phrase "street fair" on Wikipedia.
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGGL,GGGL:2006-18,GGGL:en&q=site%3Aen.wikipedia.org+%22street+fair%22
Please allow time for me to develop it.
Americasroof 13:12, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On Google there are 7,850,000 references to "Street fair"   Yeh, I know my starter article sucks, but please be patient!   Americasroof 13:27, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't believe I ever placed a db tag on this. I feel pretty bad about that. It's quite a nice little stub now. Apologies, Americasroof. — riana_dzasta wreak havoc-damage report  06:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Please do not delete
Talk:OFG Bancorp

message: I'm living in the United States, and so this would not be easy for me to accomplish... but I do think it would be great to add some historical information regarding how Jose Enrique took control of a failed S&L in the late 1980's and turned it into the successful company OFG is today. -- 216.164.159.128 02:35, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Some Background Information
Talk:João Manuel, Prince of Portugal

message: Should this maybe be a disambiguation page?  This name and title would have also been possessed by John II, John III, John V, and John VI (and possibly others).  Moreover, John VI, in particular, who served as regent for his mother for many years while Crown Prince, is surely at least as well known by the name as this guy. john k 13:19, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We should have the most used name as the title. Since John's title was Crown Prince of Portugal for his entire life, I think it's fair to use Crown Prince of Portugal for him. And, by the way, John V and John VI never used the title of Crown Prince of Portugal. They used Prince of Brazil, which was the title of the Portuguese crown princes at the time. As for John II and III they are known today by their actions as monarchs, not as crown princes. Joaopais 16:49, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say that I've rarely seen John VI referred to as "the Prince of Brazil" in English.  But I'll defer to you. john k 19:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps because he used the title of "Prince-Regent" since his mother, Queen Maria, became mad. If you want to know more about the titles see: Prince of Brazil. Joaopais 17:18, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
I proposing this article to be renamed João, Prince of Portugal for three reasons:
#The title Crown Prince of Portugal is not a Portuguese titled, since it never existed. The title used was just Prince of Portugal, with the other sons of the monarch using the title Infante.
#All other articles on Portuguese princes and infantes use the Portuguese form of the name with few exceptions
#All other users of the title "Prince of Portugal" are in the form "Name (in Portuguese), Prince of Portugal" (see João, Prince of Portugal (1451), Joana, Princess of Portugal and Afonso, Prince of Portugal)Joaopais 00:49, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. --Stemonitis 08:22, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Kagi chart

message: If I follow the instructions for drawing a Kagi Chart then I wouldn't get the chart shown in the images.  Also the charts in the images don't have thick and thin lines as per the instructions, I think this need sorting out by someone with domain knowledge. Rich257 13:20, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, and the references don't offer much more info. Instead, I found a very good description at <http://www.investopedia.com/articles/trading/07/kagi_chart.asp> and I think I can improve this article based on that. LightYear 04:51, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Have made my first attempt. Would eventually like to see a format similar to Candlestick chart. Need some better free images too. Also might be worth creating wikilinks for things like signals and stock charts. LightYear 05:35, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image does not match text

message: # Kagi charts are logically equivalent to point and figure charts. 
# I have *never* seen any documentation that shows they were invented in the 1870s in Japan. The first reference I've seen to Kagi charts is in Steve Nison's book, Beyond Candlesticks. For all I know, Nison could have actually invented Kagi charts from looking at American swing charting techniques invented by Dow, Wyckoff, Jesse Livermore and others.  -- Ed Borasky (znmeb) 3 February 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Znmeb (talk • contribs) 23:48, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Doubt on history

message: At this point it doesn't seem like any more sources are going to magically appear to bring this article up to standards. It's been over two years since the call for more citations was posted and the silence is deafening. As far as I can tell the Steve Nison book is the only source there is. IMHO the article should be removed. If there's an article about Steve Nison what little content there is here can easily be pasted there. ;-)
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky aka znmeb (talk) 02:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Should this article be removed?
Talk:Psalm 91

message: Something should really be done about the "Scottish Psalter" part.  Obviously this article was started by someone who belongs to a church community which uses said text, but it's hardly unique to that community.  This reference should be removed, in order to universalize the article itself.Sigil7 01:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: A scan across Google's returned items about 'Psalm 91' and 'Moses' quickly suggests a common consensus against any definite conclusion, although a case can be made for considering the possibility.
I propose that we insert a pointer to the general Psalm#Authorship and ascriptions article of the form:
:As with many psalms, the authorship is unknown or uncertain.
If our '80.5.101.73' contributor wants to state his/her case for Moses, then we could add something like:
: ..., although Moses has been suggested by XXX
and replacing XXX by a citation to reputable scholarly research: "Professor Some One at University of Somewhere in his book YYY or peer-reviewed paper ZZZ", as per :Wikipedia:Verifiability, :Wikipedia:Reliable sources and :Wikipedia:Citing sources. That should be straightforward for him/her to do, as he/she already claims to know of such scholarship in this revision.  Please could you provide such references or citations?  I am happy to offer to wiki-format them for you if you wish.
1 According to the new Jerusalem bible + N.I.V, Moses was the writer of psalm 90. "The Telmud writers consider that when the author's name is not mentioned we may assign the Psalm to the last named writer; and, if so, this is another Psalm of Moses, the man of God. Many expressions here used are similar to those of Moses in Deuteronomy, and the internal evidence, from the peculiar idioms, would point towards him as the composer." (bibleinsong.com)
But more importantly, According to the Bible of the Ethiopian's that is contained within the Church of St. George, Lalibela psalm 90 + 91  both writen by Moses
2 Fact Psalm 91 is a christian band from England
3 Also saturday is the sabbath   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.5.101.73 (talk) 01:58, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moses

message: Wikipedia is not the place for someone (whether me or '80.7.101.73' or anyone else) to promote own views or material or hobbies or activities: see :Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not.
This article is about the scripture 'Psalm 91'. It is not about promoting a pop group (whether Christian, atheist or anything else) simply because it shares the article's name. :Wikipedia:External links indicates that any external links from a Wikipedia article must be directly relevant to the content of the article: "no page should be linked ... unless its inclusion is justified".
I would invite '80.2.101.73' to mention below, please, the direct relevance of the band's name to the material content of the 'Psalm 91' scripture article.
Feline Hymnic (talk) 19:43, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Psalm 91 band
Talk:Goryō

message: I have no idea where I could even begin looking for some of the claims this article makes, since both Google Book Search and Worldcat have no references I can work from. The irony about the Morris reference is that while the Goryo is mentioned, none of the information presented here actually comes from that text. If whoever originally created this page would like to show us all where the information came from, that would be wonderful!Duende-Poetry (talk) 22:16, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Once Again Another Article On Japanese Folklore That Has No Sources
Talk:University of Health Sciences (Antigua)

message: The Licensing and Controversy sections of the article are strongly POV of full of unsourced opinions, including:
"Today’s University of Health Sciences Antigua School of Medicine has become one of the finest Medical Schools is the Caribbean."
Its not approved in all 50 states, which alone makes it inferior in terms of opportunities to the "Big four" of the Caribbean as well as various domicile schools such as University of the West Indies. opinions Downthatroad (talk) 22:55, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: NPV

message: One user, Xmandms, has been adding information that is in clear violation of WP:NOR and WP:SYNTH. Consensus has been reached previously that saying "School X is not accredited by Accrediting Body Y" is not an acceptable addition unless a source explicitly mentions the school. The CAAM-HP website makes no mention of UHSA so the sentence "UHSA is not accredited by the The Caribbean Accreditation Authority for Education in Medicine and other Health Professions" must be removed. In addition, a sentence like "UHSA is often criticized for offering the MD degree for health professionals with limited attendance, and online learning" is clearly a WP:NPOV violation without multiple citations (for which there are currently zero.)
I am reverting Xmandms' edits. If anyone plans on adding them back, please address the above issues first. aqwfyj Talk/Contribs 17:30, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:NOR]] and [[WP:SYNTH]] violations
Talk:Carl Humann

message: I think when he was born there Essen was part of the Kingdom of Prussia. The history of Essen article is unclear about its political assignment. I am pretty sure though it was part of the Kingdom of Prussia in the 19th-century.~~~ John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:57, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have a proper reference but that seems correct as per the German Wikipedia entries on Essen, Westphalia and Königsteele (part of Steele, now Essen). Steele was separate from Essen at the time, but both came under Prussian rule after the defeat of Napoleon in 1815 at the latest. VampaVampa (talk) 00:43, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kingdom of Prussia?
Talk:Emil Fahrenkamp

message: Re-reviewed for Wikiproject Architecture. Unfortunately the article is currently little more than a stub and demonstrates no evidence of international notability. If some authoritative evidence can be found, maybe it can be reviewed again... Sionk (talk) 12:57, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of companies of Puerto Rico

message: 30px	I have cleaned this list of non-notable companies; this includes companies with no Wikipedia article and no satisfactory third party claim to notability. This is in line with the Manual of Style guidance for lists and notability guidelines. Remember that Wikipedia is not a directory - listing all companies is not necessarily useful. Before you add a new companies please ensure they meet the relevant notability guidelines, supported by reliable sources. In general it is best if the company has a Wikipedia page (on which notability is established) before it is added.
 --Errant Tmorton166(Talk) 09:39, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: List cleaned

message: What is the criteria for inclusion in this list, any notable companies that do business in Puerto Rico or notable companies of Puerto Rican origin? 
It seems (from the first versions of this article) that the initial goal may have been companies of Puerto Rican origin, but now I see additions, such as HERE (where Merck, Pfizer, Lilly, and Abbott were added to the list) that include companies that simply do business in Puerto Rico but which are not of Puerto Rican origin. So what is the criteria for inclusion? 
Fundamentally, is this article about companies IN Puerto Rico or companies OF Puerto Rico as the title states? Meanwhile I have reverted the edits. My name is Mercy11 (talk) 13:11, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Most similar articles use companies headquartered in the country; some will use external companies with a specific "notable" presence in the region.  Basically, if "Pfizer Puerto Rico" is notable enough to have an article separate from the parent entity, then they will include it.  Frankly, there is no standard, so whatever consensus is on this page is what counts. Kuru (talk) 14:23, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. My name is Mercy11 (talk) 22:09, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Criteria
Talk:June Miller

message: The naturalization document of Wilhelm Smerth, from 1917, gives her name as June and dob as 28 January 1902. It also says immigration was 1907, but this must have been his separate immigration, as the immigration record for June, her mother and her siblings is dated 8 July 1908.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.74.134.42 (talk) 16:24, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth 

message: Do there exist any photos of June, at all? --Rwst (talk) 07:21, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: That "later life " bit is the saddest fucking thing I've ever read...
Maybe not, the end of "1984" is vomit-inducing sad, but still...shit... 79.72.221.160 (talk) 23:06, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's always seemed to me that the life of a former muse, in old age, is usually worse than tough. Examples would be Kiki of Montparnasse and Fernande Olivier, Picasso's early love. The artist's work fattens on the life of the muse when young, and later he's "shocked at her deterioration." I wonder what Henry Miller looked like at that point? The muses who end up with happy or at least satisfying later lives are the ones with their own skills: Martha Gellhorn, serious and gutsy writer; Lee Miller, photographer; Charis Wilson (Edward Weston's wife, who divorced him), photographer and memoirist. Younggoldchip (talk) 18:15, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  ...sssshhhit...