lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chris Kubasik

message: The edit history of this page clearly indicates that there is a targeted campaign to scrub it of mentions to Kubasik's dismissal from Lockheed Martin. They have been removed several times despite the outcome being well documented:
* https://www.forbes.com/sites/afontevecchia/2012/11/09/lockheed-ceo-elect-kubasik-fired-over-relationship-with-subordinate/#2e4e2a5e4d8c
* https://www.reuters.com/article/us-lockheed-kubasik/incoming-lockheed-ceo-fired-after-admitting-to-affair-idUSBRE8A81JA20121110
* https://washingtontechnology.com/articles/2012/11/09/lockheed-kubasik-fired-affair.aspx
If you find this article without mention to it, please revert to a previous version that contains it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgillson (talk • contribs) 04:15, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: When I used to work at Lockheed Martin, a senior exec told me about Chris’s dismissal and explained that it was the main reason why the company has such a comprehensive ethics training program for all employees. I came to this page to find out more about the dismissal and had to restore the deletions made by Kkubasik and other accounts. Please leave it in place. Garnercx (talk) 03:10, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If there is concern over copyright here, please talk to me. The Bio on Lockheeds site is supposed to be copyright free. Kkubasik 08:08, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Removal of slanderous Forbes article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Happykat123 (talk • contribs) 22:59, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is not protected. — xaosflux Talk 03:03, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

text: The challenged material appears well supported in RS. Please request discussion at WP:BLPNDlohcierekim (talk) 22:50, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: challenged material

message: NOTE: I’m proposing the following edits for FleishmanHillard on behalf of L3 Harris Technologies. I am a paid editor and aware of the COI guidelines. I’m submitting the following to correct inaccuracies in Chris Kubasik’s article. Please let me know of any questions or comments as you review. Thanks for your time and consideration. Jon Gray (talk) 15:22, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: .  S0091 (talk) 19:32, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you! Jon Gray (talk) 13:32, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Request 

message: NOTE: I’m proposing the following edits for FleishmanHillard on behalf of L3 Harris Technologies. I am a paid editor and aware of the COI guidelines. There were some recent leadership changes within the company that now render the info on the article outdated, so I’m submitting the following edit request to bring the article up to date. Please let me know of any questions or comments as you review. Thanks for your time and consideration. Jon Gray (talk) 21:25, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Ptrnext (talk) 06:51, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Request
Talk:Kaichū type submarine

message: Can someone provide the japanese lettering for this?  70.51.10.16 (talk) 10:49, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese kanji?

message: Can someone check the numbering on this page with the sources given? Conway (Conways All the Worlds Fighting Ships 1922-1946 (1980)) and Boyd & Yoshida (The Japanese Submarine Force and World War II (1995)) give a different numbering scheme. For example, they both give RO-33,34 as K5 Type, and RO-35to50, 55to56 as K6 Type. can anyone confirm this? Xyl 54 (talk) 12:42, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbering
Talk:Alliance Party (Fiji)

message: The name Alliance Party in misleading. In Fiji, adding 'Fijian' in front of the name of an organisation, suggests that it is for the ethnic Fijians only. The Alliance Party was formed with the uniting of various political groups representing all races in Fiji. One of these groups was the Fijian Association, which was the most powerful group in the Party. I suggest using Alliance Party (Fiji) to distinguish it from other Alliance Parties in other countries. The idea of the Alliance Party came from the Alliance Party in Malaysia.
Girmitya
: User:Xorkl000 told me the same thing.  The problem is, I seem to remember reading the name in Ratu Mara's autobiography (The Pacific Way).  I could be mistaken.  The library seems to have lost its copy of the book, so I can't check.  Anyway, now that two of you have said that the name is wrong, I will change it.  If it later turns out that I was right, I'll change it back.  David Cannon 10:40, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Strange Frame

message: Right...so what are we talking about here?Transentient 03:22, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's quite obvious that some people involved with the project have edited this article.  I was just wondering who exactly?  Esn 20:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing by people involved with the project

message: This reads like a first draft of a blog post by the movie's creators or something. If I actually knew anything about this project, I would clean it up a bit (okay, a lot).  74.215.94.89 (talk) 02:53, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Uhhhh...
Talk:Tebnine

message: From the article: "The town could be about 1300 years old as there are references to the second largest town in the vicinity, Bint Jbeil; in the Book of Joshua" [My bold] . The Book of Joshua refer to the 15th or 13th centuries BC, so if the village was mentioned in it... Troll Refaim 08:15, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So your point is? Please clarify. Where in Joshua is this reference?--Shantavira 14:49, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If the Book of Joshua refer to the village, how the village is about 1300 years old? Troll Refaim 15:29, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Some sources claim that Benjamin of Tudela identified Tebnine as the biblical Timnah.The Survey of Western Palestine: Memoirs of the Topography, Orography, Hydrography, and Archæology, Part 1 / Claude Reignier Condor and earl Horatio Herbert Kitchener Kitchener (1881); page 96; footnotes  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.65.162.112 (talk) 13:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What right? 

message: == Political Figures ==
Nabih Berri : President of the Lebanese Parliament
Ali Harajli	: Previous Minister
Ali Nasrat Alassad : Previous Minister
Said Fawaz : Previous Deputy
Hamid Dakroub : Previous Deputy
Abdallah Ghtaimi : Previous Deputy
Joseph Moughaisel : Previous Deputy
Mohamad Ali Ghtaimi : Previous Deputy
Fawzi Fawaz Ambassador
Assad Fawaz  : Mayor
I am moving the above here from the article. What is this section supposed to relay? __meco (talk) 12:55, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's this? 

message: "ninety percent of the people speak English" Proof? Maz640 (talk) 20:30, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proof?
Category talk:Philosophy articles needing attention

message: This category is problematic. At the least, some guidelines are needed. My preference, in agreement with the guidelines for categories, would be for this category only to be placed on talk pages for articles, and then only if accompanied by an explanation of what is needed. After all, every article, even those with feature article status, could do with some attention. Banno 08:19, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ayesha Jalal

message: I have removed some lines from the section on Jalal's denial of tenure at Columbia, and inserted some additional context.  The suggestion that her accusations were "unsupported by other Pakistani or Muslim faculty" is unsubstantiated.  If someone wants to put this back in, it is necessary to add a reference.  I have left one of the alleged quotes from the legal decision, but a reference should be added there also.  The second quotation seems especially suspect to me, for I doubt a court would dismiss a discrimination claim on the basis of "oddness".  The last line of that section on the frivolity of Jalal's claim displays clear bias and I have eliminated it.  It is indeed true that the vast bulk of discrimination claims are dismissed by courts.  In a case such as tenure, in which the university is able to exclude closed-door proceedings, the prosecution essentially needs to get someone to admit to discrimination on the stand.  To say these cases are frivolous in the first place is sheer mischief.  
Finally, I have added some context regarding Jalal's opposition to accepting the donation for what eventually became the Dharam Hinduja Institute of Indic Research, which lived a short and controversial existence at Columbia.  Many have alleged that this move on her part was the reason she was denied tenure.  I am not so bold as to suggest this in the entry, but it certainly bears mention and I think none would deny that she did in fact oppose accepting the funding. -elbev
It seems odd to me that a woman who has a background that many Pakistanis would be suspicious of, given she is married to a non-Muslim and a Hindu at that) would be seen as pro-Pakistani or even as pro-Muslim (her marital status alone renders her a non-Muslim according all schools of Islamic jurisprudence) by Hindu faculty. In fact they would be glad her teaching on Indian topics and use her as a propaganda too. This is done quite regularly in other arenas e.g. Bollywood etc. Maybe being denied tenure at Columbia was political but not ethnicity based.((User:Moarrikh)) 01:47, 11th December 2011.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.126.222.26 (talk) 01:50, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:First Romanian School

message: Truly? No schools teaching in Latin, German, or Hungarian? - Jmabel | Talk 08:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "The only school in Transylvania"

message: Nothing in the article makes the location clear beyond "Transylvania". - Jmabel | Talk 22:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Hey, I even have a fair idea where that is! - Jmabel | Talk 05:53, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where was it? 

message: "... the school was believed to have started in 1583." and "It is not known exactly how the school was founded, but it was recognised by the Pope in 1395." Does anyone know which is correct? CS46 22:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates
Talk:Fortran 95 language features

message: Check out [http://wwwasdoc.web.cern.ch/wwwasdoc/WWW/f90/language-elements.html Language elements
by Michael Metcalf]. Is that a copyright violation? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.237.79.16  (talk • contribs) 
:Well, this page was created by Mike himself 
 (I can witness that, and provide proofs if required). However, the point is moot: I'm not sure what happens if the same text is published under different licenses. I'll try to get a clarification and get back. Duja► 10:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There was no license provided on the linked page, so by default, there would be no right to re-use. Whereas Michael himself posted the content here, I would presume that the license he implicitly accepted via submission would carry. (I'm not a lawyer, merely a somewhat-educated lay person.) --Mr Wednesday 23:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

text: As User:Duja mentioned, Mike created this article himself. Mike discussed this a bit in a comp.lang.fortran posting at the time (Sept 29th, 2006), saying that it was based on tutorials of his which had no copyright problems. So if anyone has any doubts, use Google to find the discussion in c.l.f. --Wws 14:42, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article is a copy&paste from Metcalf's f90 tutorial
Talk:Gordon Moakes

message: I just changed the word 'xylophone' for 'glockenspiel, 
its a common mistake make but a xylophone is made of wood and a glockenspiel is made of metal.
gordon is definatly playing glockenspiel :)
Hedley 20:04, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  xylophone/glockenspiel 
Talk:Dubitative mood

message: This article is arguing with itself (has comments in the text). AnonMoos 08:48, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the sentence. It's not an evidential, but what is called a judgement modality in SIL's Glossary of linguistic terms. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 18:19, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed the German example for now, per AnonMoos' comments above. It read:
::Dubitative mood in German can be expressed when reporting events one did not experience personally. Compare the following two German sentences:
::Der neue Kanzler sagt, er werde die Zahl der Arbeitslosen senken.
::"The new chancellor says he will reduce unemployment."
::Der neue Kanzler sagt, er würde die Zahl der Arbeitslosen senken.
::"The new chancellor says he will reduce unemployment."
::[Caution: Following statement is not precise and requires review, as "werde" is in fact a subjunctive form. "wird" would be the simple (indicative) present. "werde" and "würde" express progressively greater levels of doubt in speakder's mind of agent's (chancellor's) probability of action.] In the first sentence, the phrase er werde, using a simple future form, indicates that the speaker is neutral about what the chancellor's ability and intention, while in the second sentence, the phrase er würde, using a subjunctive form, indicates that the speaker doubts the chancellor will be able to keep his promise, or doubts even the chancellor's desire to do so.
I also hid the claim that the dubitative is an evidential, per TzirTzi's comments above. If we're going to add the German example back in, I think we need to both (a) figure out what's actually grammatically correct and what the verb forms are..., and (b) improve and condense the description/explanation, which as it stands now strikes me as unnecessarily confusing to lay readers. But I dunno. --Miskwito 09:42, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That' right, "werde" in this example is "Konjunktiv I" (perhaps translatable as "first subjunctive [sic]") future. German requires a "Konjunktiv" (subjunctive) for indirect speech, so this form does not express any doubt. "würde" is "Konjunktiv II" ("second subjunctive") future, which additionally expresses doubt. Isn't this equivalent to English "The new chancellor says he would reduce unemployment"? I've never heard anyone call this a dubitative mood, though this would be a correct description of the meaning. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 18:43, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The German example and the evidential claim
Talk:AK-107

message: I know it's a descendant of his AK-47 design, but was Kalashnikov personally involved in designing this rifle? — Red XIV (talk) 16:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it was another Izhmash engineer, Alexandrov, who had been working on the BARS system since the 1970s. AK in AK-107 is derived from Alexandrov/Kalashnikov, basically meaning that Alexandrov's BARS operating system was incorporated into the AK-pattern rifle. Koalorka (talk) 04:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Designer: Mikhail Kalashnikov? 

message: How come the 7.62x39mm AK-109 is not listed on the page? - 212.108.204.4 (talk) 07:50, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  AK-109 

message: Isn't it kind of redundant to have a whole "Users" category when only Russia uses it and when there's a "Users" category in the infobox?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:318F:4750:8595:3DF5:4368:C752 (talk) 22:55, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy? 

message: The balanced recoil system does not reduce recoil. That is physically impossible with a projectile leaving the muzzle. This claim is common among firearms using this system, but physically debunkable. A perfectly-balanced autoloading bolt will in fact increase felt recoil (or more accurately, sharpen the impulse curve) to that of a bolt-action rifle.
It is not clear if these claims sprouted from AEK marketing -- which is harder to reject on wikipedia because it comes from an official source -- or from somewhere else. Furthermore, scarcity of these firearms makes debunking the claims through testing difficult.
There are other claims made of the balanced recoil system which are not disprovable:
*Increase cyclic rate
*Decrease out-of-line forces on barrel, potentially increasing accuracy.
*Reduce bolt weight / travel
The recoil claim is pervasive, and there should some editor consensus before yanking all of it out of the article. 
ExtremeSquared (talk) 20:12, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad physics / propagated rumors
Talk:Leather cannon

message: In the movie 1612, a Russian village defends against Polish invaders by building a leather cannon. If true, this would have happened over a dozen years before the third Polish-Swedish war. The movie has true and fictional elements, but I cannot find confirmation on whether the leather cannon was real or not. The closest I could find was a mention of the movie and a bit of research that someone did in relation to the MythBusters episode that tested the feasibility of a leather cannon. Either way, a mention of the film may be in order vis-a-vis the In popular Cutler section of many articles.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Synetech (talk • contribs) 21:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  1612 

message: List is included in this paper:
http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archiveDS/archiveDownload?t=arch-352-1/dissemination/pdf/vol_108/108_300_317.pdf
©Geni (talk) 21:12, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: List of surviving examples in Scotland

message: I think I read long ago that they "shrink wrapped" the leather around the leather guns. That is, you wet the leather straps before you wrap them around the thin pipe. When the leather dries it shrinks a lot and thus applies a high pressure around the pipe, thus giving much better support. But I might be confusing it with leather use in some muskets. 
I know similar wet "shrink wrapping" is used with leather in other modern applications, mostly to give the leather a tight fit around for instance a steering wheel.
--David Göthberg (talk) 05:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wet shrink wrapping
Talk:AEK-971

message: Is he Mikhail Kalashnikov's son? Why isn't this mentioned in their respective articles? And why do they have different names?
okedem 09:38, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sergey I. Koksharov 

message: A friend of mine pointed me to this article. The final sentence in this paragraph has been unsourced since September 9th, 2005! Thats quite a long time, and with close to 60 edits since then, its wearing out its welcome. I'm going to try and find a source for it (thats what I do), but if I can't find one by say, Saturday, then I'm deleteing the final sentence. Anyone who can find a source, please do so. Paladin Hammer (talk) 02:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last sentence unsourced for quite some time.
Talk:7.7×58mm Arisaka

message: What's this about the Bren providing the inspiration to attempt to replace the outdated 6.5-mm cartridge? The Japanese had been copying and using Lewis guns in .303 for years and needed no inspiration from the Bren which, in any case, was not used by the Chinese, thought its Czech ancestors were in 7.92-mm.--172.191.152.243 (talk) 21:11, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No idea and it's unsourced, will remove just that tiny bit though & see if someone comes up with more data for Chinese .303 usage to add. Tengu99 (talk) 05:19, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The Bren was used by some Chinese forces during WW II, but in 7.92mmx57 rather than .303 British.  Chinese Brens were manufactured by Inglis in Canada, and the 7.92mmx57 bolt design was later used for the L4-series of Bren conversions to 7.62mm NATO by the UK.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.241.79.130 (talk) 18:52, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bren?
Talk:6.5×50mmSR Arisaka

message: This article says nothing about its success or otherwise in action with Japanese forces. Since it was the main rifle and machine-gun cartidge at the start of the China and Pacific wars, and the whole purpose of this cartridge was military, this article should cover this. Rcbutcher (talk) 00:51, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Use in action ?

message: While strictly accurate, "6.5 Jap" is not a common term outside the US vernacular, and it isn't even particularly common in the US.  Is a single country's limited vernacular worthy of mention?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.99.248.131 (talk) 12:52, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: "Historically it has been referred to as 6.5 Jap"??

message: https://gunsmagazine.com/rifles/intermediate-cartridges/
"Germany developed the 7.92x33mm Kurz as the first Intermediate cartridge, and its rifle was,
at one time or the other, MP43, MP44 or StG 44."
http://quarryhs.co.uk/Assault.htm
"It can be argued that neither the Cei-Rigotti nor the Federov Avtomat used "intermediate" cartridges, as the 6.5mm Carcano and Arisaka were the front-line rifle/MG rounds in the Italian and Japanese armies respectively. This is true, but it is worth bearing in mind that, in terms of calibre and muzzle energy, they were in the same class as the present-day 6.8x43 Remington SPC and 6.5x38 Grendel, which are today regarded by many as ideal intermediate cartridges for assault rifles."
The second source here I think is the more important one, while I do not deny the 6.5mm's power is reminiscent of a later intermediate cartridge, its role is what matters. If the only thing that was taken into account was the terminal ballistics, then we would be saying that the PPSH-41 was the first PDW because 7.62 Tokarev has a lot more velocity than 9mm or .45 ACP. In actuality, the PPSH was a submachine gun with a handgun round like any other, and the Type 38 was a bolt action rifle with a rifle round like any other. Loafiewa (talk) 12:13, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: "Role" is irrelevant. They are not called "intermediate-role" cartridges. They are called "intermediate-power" cartridges, so power is all that matters. The difference between a PDW and a submachine gun is also irrelevant.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.70.13.107 (talk) 07:06, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: 6.5mm as intermediate
Talk:Skeletal animation

message: I'm just searching through art sections in wikipedia to see which section i might like, this is difficult without pictures90.240.114.176 00:16, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures??? 

message: I just expanded this article and added a few references.  The article, however, still need a lot of work and I'm not entirely sure what its scope is.  Wanting to expand the article, I'm not sure how to delimit it from other related articles.  Skeletal animation is (as far as I know) never used as a single, isolated technique, but useful together with other related tools.  Is there a "main" article describing how all CGI techniques are used together?   Should this page be merged? --Fama Clamosa (talk) 21:29, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do
Talk:Puppetoon

message: Both the animation style and the series can likely be covered in a single page. Ost (talk) 01:53, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Support a merge of these long-standing articles, although I can see why they might have remained separate for so long. The use of the technique other than by George Pal doesn't quite fit within the scope of the Puppetoons article as currently written, but that is the better-developed article. Perhaps merge to  Puppetoons, with a separate section briefly describing other animations using the same technique. Klbrain (talk) 11:39, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

text: Klbrain (talk) 12:18, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Puppetoons]] with [[Puppetoon]]
Talk:Heeb

message: This is a hoax magazine.
I concur.
:What do you possible mean by this?  Do you mean that you don't believe the magazine exists?  Or that the magazine perpetrates hoaxes?  If the former, I can tell you you're wrong; I've seen and read it.  If the latter, why not describe the hoax it's pulled off?  71.77.12.236 05:36, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

message: The section on "mission statement" is totally plagiarized- at least not NPOV. Any thoughts? It should be fixed, I guess. -Turbokoala (talk) 02:45, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mission Statement 