lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:TRSDOS

message: I removed this line:
:CLOAD "FILENAME" is the format for loading tape programs on a TRS-80.
CLOAD was a Level I, II and Disk BASIC command to load BASIC programs from tape, not a TRSDOS command. Nibios 23:29, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: CLOAD not a TRSDOS command

message: Is there a good reason why Randy Cook is not mentioned on this page?  
This page would also benefit from some sort of chronology/version comparison describing what version of TRS-DOS was available for which version of Trash-80.  For example, for TRS-80 Model I: TRS-DOS 2.0 -> TRS-DOS 2.1 -> Randy Cook parts with Tandy/Radio Shack -> TRS-DOS 2.2 -> TRS-DOS 2.3 etc
Similar for Models III and 4.
As it is, the page is definitely misinforming the reader, since depending on the version of TRS-80, version 1.3 cited wasn't the last version available.  
Also, it would be nice if further information would be mentioned about lineage of the OS.  I am thinking of things like: Randy Cook parting ways with Tandy half way through writing TRS-DOS 2.2, and started his own OS company VTOS.  He licensed the source code to VTOS to LDOS, and LDOS got hired by Tandy/Radio Shack to write TRS-DOS 6 (Essentially enhanced LDOS) for Model 4.  
Now, I am not an expert, but all of the above I learned from googling for half an hour, and opposed to reading all of the above in wikipedia.  Which is a shame. 
Further information: 
http://www.trs-80.org/trsdos-model1/
http://www.trs-80.org/trsdos-model1-versions/
http://www.trs-80.org/vtos/
etc.   That site has tons of info, including list of reference books (sidebar on the right side) with ISBN numbers, which should help with the validation of the information. 
Any way, just disappointed that the Wikipedia article is of such a poor quality.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.240.239.195 (talk) 19:29, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Randy Cook 

message: The screen shot at the top of this article shows that the OS refers to itself, both on its splash page and in its prompt, as TRSDOS.  Why, then, does the article consistently insert a hyphen into the OS name that the OS itself never used?  Is there official Tandy documentation that says the canonical name of the OS is TRS-DOS? 2605:6000:EE4A:2900:907E:B8AD:F6E:9CCA (talk) 07:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This Radio Shack ad from Computerworld, April 27, 1981, calls it TRSDOS. Unless there is an objection I will put in a request to move the page to TRSDOS. StarryGrandma (talk) 02:41, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I corrected the text of the article to use the correct name, but someone with proper authorization will have to move the page to match. 2605:6000:EE4A:2900:907E:B8AD:F6E:9CCA (talk) 05:43, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the article to TRSDOS after the redirect by that name was deleted to make way for the move. StarryGrandma (talk) 18:20, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  article name
Talk:Akinyele (rapper)

message: If their a difference between a studio album and an EP? .. if so then the "Put It in Your Mouth" Album shouldn't be listed as an Studio Album  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.160.118.126 (talk) 13:59, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Studio Album or EP? 

message: This biographical article needs more biographical information on the subject. Statistical information, such as date and place of birth, information on historical significance, and information on accomplishments. The article should be expanded by providing vital personal details, family, educational background, career development, and any possible honors or awards. Thanks, Star767 (talk) 16:43, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  More biographical information needed
Talk:List of career achievements by Vince Young

message: Is Vince Young the 2005 Heisman Winner, since he was second in the voting, and the winner, Reggie Bush forfeited the Heisman from 2005.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.126.89.10 (talk) 21:39, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heisman
Talk:Sexual conflict

message: I was horrified to see that WP didn't have a single mention of the Sneaky Fucker Strategy. Sadly I don't have the journal access to get good cites - anybody want to take a stab at it? --Calair (talk) 09:10, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I read a book on sexual conflict and I don't know that was even mentioned. There are lots of things to talk about; sneaker males not being mentioned isn't a big deal (and hardly anything is mentioned at the moment). Richard001 (talk) 12:17, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sexual conflict - the battle of the sexes - occurs in humans and is the basis of patriarchy, matriarchy and feminism: all combative systems against the opposite sex, limiting its chioce.  In human sexual conflict, whether these strategies of the opposite sex announce themselves as such directly, will be evaluated on the basis of effectiveness.  The mythologies surrounding patriarchy, matriarchy and feminism are themselves an adaptation, a tool against the opposite sex.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ef1011 (talk • contribs) 09:36, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biological sexual conflict is the origin of feminism 

message: This page is the most complete page I have viewed so far. It covers the topic of sexual conflict much more indepthly than the chapter that I am focusing on. There is information about subjects that I have never heard of, such as penis fencing, antagonistic coevolution, toxic ejaculation, and so much more. This page has so many different sections relating to the central topic that I do not know what more could be added. Furthermore, this page has so many citations and references that the content is all the more trustworthy. The Talk section shows that this page is actually under WikiProject: Evolutionary biology. The project is  deemed to be Start-class and of High importance. I do not really agree with the Start-class rating from what I see, especially in view of the History section. This page started in August 2006 and was last revised September 12, 2012. There have been many contributions by various users made to this project of the the 6 years that has been in existence.WhitleyTucker (talk) 19:45, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Hayashi clan

message: This article was written by User:LordAmeth and contributed to both The Samurai-Archives Wiki and Wikipedia; the author gives permission for his work to be used in this way, and to not be considered copyright violation on the part of either wiki project. LordAmeth 16:32, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I leave that up to you, as you obviously know more about it than I do; I wasn't quite sure whether or not these were all of the same line. Incidentally, may I ask you what sources you use, as you definitely seem to have access to an extensive knowledge of specific details on families, domains, and tons of other aspects of Japan's history, far beyond what my books have to offer. LordAmeth 21:33, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks...I'll see what I can find about the Hayashi family. As far as the sources I use, Hanshi Daijiten, Meiji Ishin Jinmei Jiten, and 300 Han hanshu jinmei jiten are a few of the more prominent ones. -Tadakuni 00:34, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Qibo

message: Can someone add WG romanizations? 132.205.44.5 00:49, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wade-Giles 

message: Isn't this right? ㄑ一ㄅㄛ 132.205.44.5 21:39, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: bopomofo

message: Correct me if I'm wrong, but 上古时代 can be simply translated as "most ancient times".
This also fits the (chinese) definition in http://baike.baidu.com - the (time of the) origin of chinese people.
--Duke.of.spacingham (talk) 18:49, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  shang gu shi dai
Talk:Family tree of the Māori gods

message: Nice table Wolfgang. 
Made some minor corrections. Actually, I do have a couple aahhaof concerns about this table, which I was intending to raise with you about the German version. 
#Firstly, just what version does it represent - that is, just whose tradition is this? If it is a 'combination' from various tribal traditions, then it is something newly-created here that may never have existed in reality in this particular form. I think it is important that something that is represented here as 'Māori' tradition should have existed as a whole in at least one identifiable source. Or does it come from one source, and if so, what was it? If the source was Wikipedia, then that might be problematic. What I am saying is, is there one source in which all these characters occur in this exact genealogical relationship with one another, or has this relationship been derived from combining various (possibly unrelated) sources? 
#Another matter is that some of the figures mentioned are not important gods, or even gods at all. Rehua - if a god, not a major god (god of what exactly??), quite a minor character in the stories about the semi-god Tāwhaki. Punga and his descendants are minor characters too - villians or comic characters in stories about more important characters such as Tāwhaki. Kaitangata is not a god either - he is a relatively minor character, human husband of the celestial woman Whaitiri, who is more important than he is. Kahuroa 00:18, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The problems mentioned above have never been addressed ... This article has no credible basis. Piwaiwaka (talk) 05:39, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Provenance?
Talk:Aizuchi

message: こんにちは、 the external link is no longer working - I'm getting a 404. Maybe the primary author of this page can adjust this - preferably change it with something better. As I have no suggestion, I'm just reporting it rather than changing the page myself.
Voidzero (talk) 10:42, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, thanks for reporting the dead link. I've managed to find a living version of the page at a new URL. Opencooper (talk) 20:45, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link no longer working
Talk:Liberty Middle School (New Jersey)

message: The article gives no major description of the school other than information readers could guess by themselves, and is poorly organized. There is no reason that LMS should get a Wikipedia article but all the other schools in the West Orange district shouldn't. I'm marking Edison Central Sixth School(the school listed in Liberty Middle School's "See Also" section) for deletion as well. I live in town...they're not important schools. If you think they are, write better articles on them.Wild One 00:32, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Thomas A. Edison Central Sixth Middle School (New Jersey)

message: The article gives no major description of the school other than information readers could guess by themselves, and is poorly organized. There is no reason that EMS should get a Wikipedia article but all the other schools in the West Orange district shouldn't. I've marked Liberty Middle School(Edison School's article is listed in Liberty School's  "See Also" section) for deletion as well. I live in town...they're not important schools. If you think they are, write better articles on them. Wild One 02:28, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:HMS Tyger

message: I see that - as with many other articles on sailing era warships, the author has given what purports to be metric tonnage equivalents for the tons burthen. Apologies if you are already aware of this, but I clearly need to spread the word that tons burthen (used for all ships of the sailing era, although the calculation varied from one nation to another) are units of measurement and not units of weight (so reference to "long tons" is also an error) and there are no metric equivalents. It was only with the introduction of displacement tons during the 19th Century that tons acquired the meaning of tons weight. Sadly, this may mean that a large number of articles need to be checked and - where necessary - corrected. Rif Winfield (talk) 14:07, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tons Burthen cannot be given metric equivalents
Talk:Confrontation Clause

message: This article should be deleted and merged into the existing subtopic on the sixth amendment's article. Rlove (talk) 14:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Currently it is very US specific. I would like to know how this is handled in other countries. Thanks, Bernburgerin (talk) 07:45, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overview of different countries 

message: There is currently a loud debate at the national level regarding whether or not President Trump has a constitutional right to meet his accuser, the whistleblower who remains anonymous.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/06/politics/sixth-amendment-require-whistle-blower-to-face-donald-trump-fact-check/index.html
https://www.npr.org/2019/10/01/766176669/legal-experts-say-the-right-to-confront-accusers-does-not-apply-to-impeachment
Shouldn't this article make some reference to this? I came here looking for information and didn't find much to help me.
Marcusreese (talk) 15:55, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  , the article should not make reference to this as Trump's claims at the time were related to impeachment proceedings and the Confrontation Clause explicitly references the words "in all criminal prosecutions." Muttnik talk 23:56, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current controversy regarding impeachment and the right to meet an accuser
Talk:Jain rituals

message: Hi,
I'm new to Wikipedia but have attempted to 'Wikify' a number of pages on the 'backlog' list.
I don't feel confident enough yet to delete the 'Wikify' template on pages I've amended.
My mentor seems to have disappeared; I only corresponded with him/her once; honest.
If you are experienced and have any constructive comments to make on my amendments, including, whether my amended pages have been 'Wikified' enough to warrant deletion of the ‘Wikify’ template I would love to hear them.
Jmrtn13 00:34, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Appointments Clause

message: Currently this article says the following:The Appointments Clause divides constitutional officers into two classes: principal officers, who must be appointed through the advice and consent mechanism; and inferior officers, who may be appointed through advice and consent of the Senate, but whose appointment Congress may place instead in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
This would leave the reader under the impression that this clause of the Constitution uses the word principal and in particular the phrase principal officers. But it does not. The only reference in the Constitution to "principal officer" is in the previous paragraph where is says: [The president] may require the opinion, in writing, of the principal officer in each of the executive departments, upon any subject relating to the duties of their respective offices
The term inferior officers, on the other hand, does appear in the appointments clause. Michael Hardy (talk) 18:49, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I wanted to learn about being a doctor
So I can help people in the community
And get money so I can build my mom's house and my own house I want to finish school. First I  want Jesus to help me and answer me with blessings thank you 41.115.127.232 (talk) 17:31, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:Portuguese South African

message: This needs a complete rewrite IMO. The spelling is horrendous and the historical accuracy, or lack thereof, is laughable. Portuguese being enslaved en masse from the Dutch East Indies? What a laugh... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.39.133.148 (talk • contribs) 
:I completely agree. The historical accuracy is very very doubtful and the story is blatantly anti-Dutch and thus very POV.
# I do not know of any Portugese settlement prior to 1652 at the Cape. The same thing holds for Mauritius. Although the VOC did take a lot of Spanish-Portugese colonies (Portugal was in the hands of Holland's foe Spain until 1640), it is not true that all Dutch colonies have once been Portugese.
# The article calls the local population 'blacks' this is rather inaccurate and confusing, particularly because some black slaves did get imported from other parts of Africa.
# Some (in fact many) of the local people (Khoikhoi) did get enslaved
# There is a Malay community particularly in Cape Town but any connection with Portugese would really have to be documented to be credible. What did happen is that Dutch people who had lived in what is now Indonesia and had acquired servants there often made false promises to them that they could accompany tuan to Holland when he left, only to dump them in Cape Town.
Jcwf (talk) 15:15, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hmmmmm

message: maybe someone with competence can answer me why there are quite many white south africans with portuguese names like ferreira or de freitas who usually speak afrikaans (and are considered as afrikaners) and whose ancestors are obviously longer in SA than the independence of angola and mozambique occured. did they come, as the article mentions, with the dutch in earlier centuries from south east asia?   --Severino (talk) 09:16, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: This article is an unsourced POV mess! Doing some changes. The Ogre (talk) 11:48, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: There are 4 photos of South African personages who may be of distant (minor) Portuguese descent but are not ethnic Portuguese. D´Oliveira and Trevor Manuel are Cape Coloureds and Wayne Ferreira and Schalk Ferreira are White Afrikaners, using traditional South African ethnic identifications.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.196.130.237 (talk) 20:34, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-Portuguese in the Photos Section
Talk:Rayavaram (Markapur mandal)

message: I moved the page from Rayavaram (Andhra Pradesh) to Rayavaram (Krishna district) as there appears to be at least six villages called Rayavaram in Andhra Pradesh per the National Habitation Survey 2003 of the Ministry of Rural Development, NIC-Dept. of Drinking Water Supply. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Portable digital personal health record

message: I still think this should be merged into electronic health record, even though an anonymous editor has re-added all the text I removed in converting this to an encyclopedic stub.  My reasoning was that it was written like an advertisement and contained a lot of unnecessary information (e.g. a list of every kind of storage media ever invented).  Anyway, it seems that the differences between a "portable digital personal health record" and an electronic health record are minor enough that this could just be a section there.  Can anyone give me a good reason to the contrary? --Alynna 01:25, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Upon advice from another editor at Talk:Electronic health record, I've redirected this to Personal health record. --Alynna 17:41, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article
Talk:Side Show (musical)

message: i just heard "Who Will Love Me As I Am?" for the first time. That's all i know about the (Side)show. My suggestion for improving this article assumes the musical numbers are listed accurately.
Right now the article has Act I in column 1, Act II in column 2. What about changing it to original Broadway production in column 1, revival in column 2? Something like this sandbox comparison so you can see, for example:
*both start with "Come Look At The Freaks",
*the revival has different songs before "Feelings You've Got to Hide", and more of them,
*the revival replaces "New Year's Day – Terry, Buddy, Jake, Daisy, Violet and Company" with "New Year's Eve Sequence – Terry, Buddy, Jake, Daisy, Violet and Company",
*etc.
By the way, why doesn't Wikipedia's edit history (compare selected versions) align the two versions of "Feelings You've Got to Hide", "Say Goodbye"s, "The Interview"s, "New Year"s...?71.121.143.68 (talk) 05:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: comparing original Broadway musical numbers to revival
Talk:Holy Redeemer High School

message: Please note this isn't this school's page on Wikipedia. Instead, it is an encyclopedia article about this school. This isn't Facebook. Instead, it is a place to summarize what has been written about the school in reliable sources, independent of the school. This article is not in any way for the school. It is not here to promote the school. It is not a means of communication for the school, or for its students past or present. We do not care what the school wants known about the school. We do not care what you think you know about the school. If it hasn't been written about by an independent source, it isn't going in the article. Any questions? John from Idegon (talk) 00:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What this article is; and what it isn't.
Talk:History of the Jews in Texas

message: Are there any objections to renaming this article Jewish history in Texas?  That would follow the guidelines of articles about other states.  We could then redirect this title to the other article. Karanacs 18:55, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If there are no objections then I'll make the change in 24 hours. Thanks! Karanacs 15:15, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sound good to me. Bhaktivinode 17:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename proposal
Talk:E3 2007

message: Based on the talk page from the article History of E3, this article is to be merged with it once E3 2007 is over.  Useight 01:35, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

message: How about if we call it the PSP Slim? When you type this into the queue, you are redirected to PSP anyway.209.91.61.223 08:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Official title for new PSP?
Talk:Team origin

message: Hi, this topic is already covered in greater detail as Team_Origin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Team_Origin.
I suggest the author of this article integrates the content into the existing page.
Incidentally, the team name is: TeamOrigin (no spaces). I suggest the title be changed, and will be suggesting so on the other page (so the reference may have changed!).
Bedbuggie 01:35, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Jan Hoag

message: People that readers don't really know should have a photo of them, could somebody please post one of this actress page. Thanks --Joewski 01:40, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Talk:Team Origin

message: I strenuously disagree that this page be deleted - it is of great historical significance that Great Britain (GB, not 'UK' - can that be changed please?) has an entry in the 33rd America's Cup - a matter of great sporting interest.
Could I politely advise that the team name is 'TeamOrigin', without spaces. Could the title of this article be revised accordingly, with a link from the otherwise logical existing article 'Team Origin' to aid location.
Bedbuggie 01:41, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Sammamish River

message: User CurtisId had a lot of interesting details about the Sammamish basin that were deleted by a more recent edit (when the River info box was added). While the information was dense and probably could have been edited for readability, I don't understand why it was removed completely. Was this intentional, and if so, what was the reasoning behind making such a large change without comment?Llachglin 01:42, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Croatoan (Supernatural)

message: This page needs a lot of work.
:The episode it features is in need of many explanations as to the demonic Virus and the demonic offspring that conjured a demon (or "the Demon") at the end of the episode, and says as expected, SAM is immuned to the virus.
It is one of the more intriguing episodes of Supernatural, but in wikipedia the most undiscussed.
I may contribute a lot in my next spare time, mean time, may somebody please help flesh out this article, PLEASE.
:—-— .:Seth Nimbosa:. (talk • contribs) 01:44, 12 July 2007 (UTC)