Talk:Mehrabad International Airport

message: Hello  I believe we should remove the info about which airline uses which terminal per this discussion. Sunnya343 (talk) 17:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminals 

message: Hi Shayan MB24, you're right about there being more Yes than No responses, but according to WP:NHC, consensus is supposed to be based on the strength of the arguments, as opposed to the total number of votes. The person who closed the discussion, ScottishFinnishRadish, said that  I believe the Mehrabad Airport table goes against that consensus, so I removed it. Sunnya343 (talk) 06:11, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: One person's argument is not enough, it is all subjective at the end of the day, so I suggest you let go of this matter when just having a table does not cause any harm in an encylopedia. Shayan MB24 (talk) 19:05, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please take a moment to read about Requests for Comment (RFC), how this RFC was closed, and the consensus that was reached. If you believe that the consensus from that RFC allows the Mehrabad table to remain, you can let me know. (Or, if you disagree with the consensus, you can contact ScottishFinnishRadish directly. See WP:CR.) Otherwise, the table should be removed. Sunnya343 (talk) 20:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have read the entire discussion and to me it looks like the general consensus is keeping the table. I do not know why you are so keen on doing this for just the Mehrabad airport page when there are thousands of airport pages on wikipedia with similar tables. I personally think you should let this go. Shayan MB24 (talk) 21:58, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, but your interpretation of the consensus differs from ScottishFinnishRadish's. So if you want, you have to speak to them directly, as I mentioned.I also replaced the table in the Las Vegas airport article with a summary of the airport's operations. You can see this discussion I had with another editor regarding my removal of the table.We should not ignore something that goes against consensus and Wikipedia policies. Sunnya343 (talk) 22:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no consensus reached on this matter. One or two people's opinions does not determine the format of thousands of encyclopedia pages. So I suggest you stop with your disruptive edits and put your editing efforts in other areas rather than trying to change something that has been part of the encyclopedia's airport pages for so long. I do not really care for ScottishFinnishRadish's interpretation as he is only one editor out of millions. Once you have a majority opinion that are advocating what you are, then you are welcome to go ahead with your "reforms". Until then, I suggest you let this matter go and contribute to Wikipedia in a positive way rather than dividing opinions. Shayan MB24 (talk) 02:07, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: With respect, it appears that you do not understand how Requests for Comment work, even though I shared some links with you earlier. I am going to request a third opinion. Sunnya343 (talk) 03:07, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

text: On second thought, I don't see the need for a third opinion, because I think it's already clear that you've chosen not to learn about how RFCs work. Sunnya343 (talk) 07:19, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

text: If you wish to review the RFC see WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Otherwise the content stays out unless it can be properly sourced, so WP:BURDEN also applies. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 19:51, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airlines and Destinations