lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John B. Castleman Monument

message: The two things that stick out to me are 'Castleman' in italics in the last sentence and the orphaned quote with no context. Is there a reason for this?
Isaac rowe1 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 03:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't worry, somebody put it in spanish!128.114.226.180 (talk) 02:45, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is up with the intro paragraph?
Talk:Warren County PCB Landfill

message: The article has significant NPOV issues as it reads basically as if Wikipedia is clearly on the side of the Warren County PCB Landfill protesters rather then simply describing the controversy in neutral terms. Phrases like "For the next decade, as citizens tenaciously attempted to hold the Governor to his public..." and "Ultimately, however, the state and the EPA protected their own interests...", and "Citizens got a cleanup, but it was without qualified independent detoxification oversight and the cleanup standards and protection they deserved." are clearly not NPOV. If you wish to include such statement then you need to attribute them to a notable source. Here is made up example of a way to include that sort of viewpoint and comply with the NPOV policy on Wikipedia: "John Smith, in an article for the magazine Environmentalist Today, wrote "Consequently, the state and the EPA evaded long-term liability for the PCB landfill and hid the truth about EPA's failed, “dry-tomb” landfills. Citizens got a cleanup, but it was without qualified independent detoxification oversight and the cleanup standards and protection they deserved." which would NPOV since it's properly attributed. You would still need to describe the background that quote refers to in NPOV terms explaining both sides of the controversy. Essentially, you need to describe the efforts to clean up the sight, the actions and responses of the EPA, WV government and governor, etc. towards that effort, and the accusations by critics that the EPA, state. governor, etc. was hiding the truth and trying to avoid liability (they must be attributed to specific critics without the use of weasel words like "Critics charged..." or "Environmentalist claimed..."). --Cab88 (talk) 23:36, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV/tone issues with article 

message: This article was very helpful in learning about the events, but it could use one or two improvements to make it even better.
As mentioned above the article could use some edits to make sure it does not take on a strong bias. There are some very minor edits which could help fix this issue by just changing word choice in several statements such as "deserved". 
Another suggestion is in regards to sources, most of the links when I clicked on them did not work, and a lot of the information in the article does not have direct footnotes. It would be helpful if the source citing was edited to make finding the original sources of information easier. 
The article may also benefit from having more statements from both the members of the community and the ones in charge of placing the dump there. 
Fiyr grant (talk) 16:02, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions for Improvement
Talk:The Paideia School

message: Previous edits to this page note certain calendar items. The Paideia School calendar varies from year to year. The school is non-sectarian and vacation days have no reflection on school philosophy or beliefs. As we have time off for may reasons, New Year's Day, Christmas, teacher planning days, etc. It does not seem correct to reference any days off, or you will have to cite them all. Wrede66 (talk) 14:00, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

message: Photo of main building still needed; my camera could not focus on the building for some odd reason. I'll try again. --mav (reviews needed) 00:51, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: The following sentence was repeatedly removed : "In the schoolyear 2017-2018, it celebrates the Jewish feast Rosh Hashanah, but no Christian feast.Site of the school, Schoolyear 2017-2018.
Is it possible to know why this school celebrates Jewish feasts and no Christian feasts ? Marvoir (talk) 14:15, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish and Christian feasts 

message: The sparse “History” section notes that Paideia was founded at the same time as the 1971 “segregation academies” for white students fleeing racially integrated Georgia public schools. But it asserts that the founders of Paideia sought to create a “less-segregated” private school. Less segregated than what? This suggests questions about the mission of the founders and whether all of the initial students were white. When did Paideia become integrated? Has no one documented the school’s history? — ℜob C. alias ALAROB 05:56, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Less segregated” segregation academy?
Talk:United States v. Wheeler (1920)

message: There are two Supreme Court cases (that I know of) named United States v. Wheeler.  The other one doesn't have an article yet.  69.140.152.55 (talk) 00:13, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambiguate? 

message: The article as a whole discussed the facts of the case, the USSC decision itself, subsequent decisions citing Wheeler, and topically related legal scholarship. It dabbles in the obvious traps to sensationalize the amply outrageous facts without wallowing in them. (e.g. 'permitted to denounce' instead of 'denouncing' to imply someone desperate pleading, using 'meant for' instead of 'erected to shelter' to imply Sonoran refugees had been displaced, putting passport in quotes to opine on what was not yet settled law, in a sentence constructed as an evocative narrative instead of a straightforward recitation of facts e.g. 'Passage through these checkpoints was conditioned on presentation of a passport issued by Wheeler', 'kangaroo court' is an uninformative pejorative not a description of the convening authority and procedures of the court.) The chronicle of outrageous events allows the reader to exercise discernment and reach a durable conclusion beyond  a fleeting impressions of editors opinions and on the whole the article is a credible effort to create encyclopedic content that in the past would have been written and edited by experts in this area of law.
At this time the final paragraph is an interesting and engaging but uninformative speculation that certain causes might rely on Wheeler to expand the rights of particular classes in federal court. Its neither fact nor law and it makes no pretense of considering the claims it makes in any scholarly way, and the citations are student written articles published in less authoritative law review journals. I'm skeptical that unbalanced advocacy for hypothetical cases that law students argue could someday be logical sequelae of Wheeler is appropriate content for an encyclopedia article the general public can rely on as a source of factual knowledge. 
Its not immediately obvious that attempting to balance the paragraph's point of view by considering the merits of the proposed advocacies would improve the situation. The reader's preceding context is the authoritative opinion of USSC justices. Putting the contemplations of Wikipedia contributors in the same context might appeal to an advocate because it seems to elevate the standing of the arguments offered. A critical reader should see it as calling the point of view of the entire article into question, invalidating its value as a reference, compelling them to disregard the entire article and turn their attention to another source. 
I would confine an article about a century old historical USSC decision to historical facts and leave speculation about hypothetical future cases relying on the precedent to student law review journals, but I'm going to leave it to editors who look at these articles regularly. PolychromePlatypus (talk) 15:03, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final paragraph is questionable
Talk:Michael Lambert (volleyball)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/sports/olympics/longterm/vball/men/lambert.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB 11:32, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Dan Landry

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/sports/olympics/longterm/vball/men/landry.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Giants2008 (27 and counting) 15:12, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:East Greenwich High School

message: The list of running accomplishments was grossly out of proportion with the length of the rest of the article, and had no sources.  It seems like the track teams have experienced great success - several sentences with sources giving the most notable accomplishments would be far more appropriate and readable than the laundry list of trivia I deleted.  Such a list belongs on a school webpage; it might work as a separate Wikipedia article, "East Greenwich High School Track Team," if supporting sources were included to demonstrate notability.
Also, I removed the sentence "EGHS is the only high school in the country with the nickname "Avengers.""  This was unsourced, and it appears that there is at least one other high school athletic team competing under that name. Greenth (talk) 19:50, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I feel that, instead of having only track having its own article, an article for "East Greenwich High School athletics" should be created, thus lumping all of the sports together and cleaning up the article. Devinthepeng (talk) 11:21, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sports 

message: Under the opening definition I plan on updating the Newsweek listing to 2016 data, for which EGHS was listed in the top 500 high schools. 04:59, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: General
Talk:Columbia, Missouri

message: As a Midwestern college town, Columbia has a reputation for progressive politics, persuasive journalism, and public art.[1]  [better source needed]
As a Midwestern college town, Columbia is home to high-quality health care facilities, cultural opportunities, and a low cost of living. [1]
Jman31474 (talk) 21:57, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed source for what Columbia is known for 

message: I am just curious, why did this even need to be clarified to begin with? How else would someone reasonably pronounce the word "Columbia"? Ribose carb (talk) 20:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Consider how a Spanish speaker would pronounce the country "Colombia". I think the clarification is needed, especially because around 10% of the City of Columbia was not born in the United States. Grey Wanderer (talk) 21:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Paul Dee

message: Not sure who put this stuff in there, but there is one reference, in an editorial, to $128,000 in Pell Grant benefits that went mostly to the coke addled runner of the scam.  No commet in there about 220 in benefits, nor any mention of the 400K in benefits elsewhere.
One "reference" is an editorial.
The other two get a 404 error as nonexistent.
Without going through the history to see who though these things belonged in a wikipedia article, I will just assume good faith and figure the person transposed some other article for their referenced accusations.
CodeCarpenter (talk) 20:16, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced Accusations 
Talk:The Builder

message: If there's substantial continuity between The Builder and Building (as Building (magazine) has it at present), then they should presumably be a single page. Alternatively, if they're kept as two separate pages, I think the relation between them need to be respecified on each page. Dsp13 (talk) 00:56, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There's never going to be enough information to justify two different articles. I agree with the merge and will bash ahead when i get a minute. The merge was suggested 10 months ago and no comments so i'm guessing everyone who matter is OK with it... extraordinary (talk) 13:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Tourism in Bulgaria

message: Could you please clean these massive galleries on the page (WP:NOTGALLERY)? I could do it, but I'll leave it to you. cheers, Sadkσ (talk is cheap)
:Sorry, but WP:SPA is opposing. Jingiby (talk) 06:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Galleries 
Talk:Parioli

message: Some sentences about Parioli youngsters' lifestyle are rude and questionable, e.g. an ice cream bar nickname ("tre frocci", why not "three queers"?). This article has to be undestandable to everybody, even who doesn't know Parioli  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.213.50.2 (talk) 16:09, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead an encyclopedian way 

message: via Archimede is actually in quartiere Pinciano  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dgmarta (talk • contribs) 22:23, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Via Archimede  
Talk:50 State Quarters designs

message: We should include the name of the person who designed each quarter--Ted-m (talk) 01:16, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually we shouldn't add them to this page, since the District of Columbia and United States Territories Quarter Program is a separate program from the 50 State Quarters Program. Nibios (talk) 22:16, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The former "Individual State Designs" section isn't trivia, as the banner describes it. Trivia assumes that the information could somehow be assimilated into appropriate sections of the article. The structure of the article, however, is a wiki-formatted list, which is both completely appropriate for the nature of the article and a bit rigid. That is, it should not be changed, but neither can it support much more text. The absorption of the "trivia" section would be difficult and detrimental.
Korossyl (talk) 21:35, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Trivia 

message: I believe only a person who never seen a giant sequoia could make the statement about the tree on the California quater. Is there any source that can substantiate it? 99.59.74.208 (talk) 09:17, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Giant Sequoia
Talk:Mark Wilson's Complete Course In Magic

message: Navy.enthusiast (talk) 23:35, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

message: This article is a book article, so I don't think it should be merged. It is and was a major tome during the 1990's. --Bddmagic (talk) 01:37, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinions
Talk:Hlíðarendi (stadium)

message: What's in a name? Is this related to the home of the saga hero Gunnar in Njall's saga? --Nettings (talk) 01:20, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know 100% for sure why it's called Hlíðarendi but this is the way i see it. Valur is based in a neighborhood called Hlíðar, to be precise at the edge of the neighborhood. Hlíðarendi could be translated to English as Slope's end but in this way it could also mean Hlíðar's end (an area at the edge of the Hlíðar neighborhood) and at the same time it references Gunnar of Hlíðarendi one of the most famous characters in the Icelandic sagas.--Jóhann Heiðar Árnason (talk) 22:26, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:WikiProject North Macedonia

message: There must be something wrong with this template's wikicode; if one tries to insert the parameter Class=C (when the template is used in an article's talk-page in order for the article to be assessed), the  displayed output is "Class=B". --Omnipaedista (talk) 02:32, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikicode error

message: Change all instances of "Macedonia" to "North Macedonia" to reflect name change. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 20:06, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. As per Template talk:Europe topic. -- /Alex/21 00:23, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

text: Not done: The WikiProject is still at Wikipedia:WikiProject Republic of Macedonia. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:13, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 13 February 2019
Talk:Harold Martin (dragster driver)

message: :In addition to driving competitively, [Martin] is president and CEO of Martin Technologies, a company creating technological solutions for automotive applications.
What exactly is a "technological solution for automotive applications"? Is it an actual thing? If so, why not call it what it, you know, is? – AndyFielding (talk) 07:57, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual thing, right?
Talk:Abilene (song)

message: In the box on the right are certain facts. 
Listed as songwriters for the song, 'Abilene' are: 
Bob Gibson and John D. Loudermilk. 
Then, in the first paragraph of the article it states the songwriters are: 
Bob Gibson, Lester Brown and John D. Loudermilk. 
The facts are not consistent; did Lester Brown co-author 'Abilene' or not? 
This is the kind of thing Wiki-haters like point to as an example of why you should not trust the information you read on Wikipedia. 
Whoever is in charge of this Wiki-article should vet the information and at least make sure the 'facts' provided are consistent and accurate.
184.76.56.97 (talk)JSJR 05232015   — Preceding undated comment added 03:19, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  DISCREPANCY
Talk:Adelante (Operación Triunfo song)

message: I haven’t followed this show (Operacion Triunfo) but I found the song Adelante and liked it a lot, but most of the sources I’ve found through googling (and none which seems to be more authorative than anything else) refer to the artist as "Naiara Ruz" instead of "Naiara Ruiz", does anyone have any source of the correct name of the artist? Eliashedberg (talk) 11:59, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Artist’s last name – Ruz or Ruiz?
Talk:Battles of the Isonzo

message: How about a map of the region? Sca (talk) 22:03, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No map? 

message: i see a list of involved units in the first battle. could someone add it to the others?
Sanguin13 (talk) 15:00, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Involved units 

message: While both in the World War I infobox, and here in the text with reference the number of casualties of the TOTAL WWI is about 600/1200 thousand Italian/Austro-Hungarian lifes, which contradicts the sum of the table later in the text, which shows much higher casualties only for this battle (series): 950/520 thousand. So the number of casualties of the battles should be revised strongly! 89.132.194.169 (talk) 11:22, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualties 

message: Why are Isonzo battles considered separated from the rest? In the West the fact Entente was fighting in Marna in 1918 was not considered a defeat  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.8.171.79 (talk) 19:36, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but discussing here about who won the 12th battle has no value as long as the WP article on that battle calls it a Central Powers victory.  If you want to change this, get that that article changed first, by first finding sources that say something different, and then discussing it on talk on that article's talk page, not here.  (And a hint: any such sources must include the whole battle, not just the last exhausted bit of fighting after retreating 100km and losing four times as many soldiers.)  Until then, this article must reflect the battle's main article.  --A D Monroe III(talk)  22:55, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Central Power victory?
Talk:Cohoes, New York

message: I would appreciate it if someone in Cohoes would take and upload a picture, which would be useful for Erie Canal.
What I'm looking for is a picture of Lock 18 looking up from the parking lot of the Cohoes Falls Park, on Mohawk St. below.  It would show well how high up the lock is. There are available pictures of the lock from close, but not this. I was there over 10 years ago, when the park opened.
Those interested in the canal history might like Aqueduct, New York, which I recently wrote. deisenbe (talk) 10:34, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture wanted
Talk:Nasjonal sikkerhetsmyndighet

message: I'm not exactly sure what your rationale for this is. This is the official Norwegian language name for this agency.
http://www.nsm.stat.no/
I see no reason at all to delete this redirect. The criteria set forth was that this was an 'implausible typo' - as you can see it isn't a typo at all in the first place. --Joffeloff (talk) 01:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My apologies. I don't speak Norwegian and it looked like vandalism at first sight. I've rescinded my nomination for speedy deletion. Redfarmer (talk) 01:33, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy deletion
Talk:Ain't No Love in the Heart of the City

message: The first time I heard this song, I knew I heard it somewhere before, although not in its entirety. After some searching, I found where I heard it from. The song, rather chorus, is used at the end of "Rock you all night long" by Dan Reed Network of off the self titled album from 1988. My question is could this be included in the "notables" section of this page?
Luvofgti22 (talk) 17:24, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Jan Sztaudynger

message: The 3rd sentence in the "Jan Sztaudynger" article is misleading:        
"Sztaudynger was best known for his epigrams,  which in Poland were called Fraszka, after the literary cafe Fraszka at ulica Piotrkowska 96 in Łódź."  
The word "fraszka" was introduced into the Polish language, from the Italian "frasca", in the 16th century by Jan Kochanowski, who wrote 485 of them – well before the Łódź cafe of that name opened its doors.
Nihil novi (talk) 04:38, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fraszka"
Talk:Rensselaer, New York

message: There's no source given (as far as I can see) for where the pronunciation in this article came from. While /rɛnsəˈlɪər/ does appear in online dictionaries such as Random House's, residents of the area appear to favor /'rɛnsələr/. Just sharing an observation. 68.193.131.254 (talk) 21:52, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation of "Rensselaer"