lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Star Wars: Masters of Teräs Käsi

message: I came across a mistake which happens on just all big gaming sites, from Gamespot to Mobygames, IGN, Gamefaqs, VGRebirth and so on.
In Europe it was published by Virgin Interactive Entertaiment (Europe) Ltd.
my source, the  back cover of the game itself since i have it. 
I am sure everyone can find a big scan of the pal back cover somewhere and read the part about virgin there. its mentioned in the pal french/german/dutch manual multiple times as well  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.245.29.199 (talk) 13:51, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pal Publisher is not LucasArts 

message: I don't really see the importance or significance of listing soul caliber at the end of the article as related...Birdzilla12345 (talk) 02:53, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: See Also needed?
Talk:KBTX-TV

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
# WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information." As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.
# As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced.
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article.
# Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable. Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 18:18, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 
Talk:KBCB

message: I have moved this article from KBCB-TV to KBCB. Consensus on both WP:NC#Broadcasting and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations#Article_names is that the article name should reflect the actual call letters of the TV station. As can be seen here:  the call letters for this station are in fact KBCB. Any concerns regarding this topic would be best addressed here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations. —A 22:44, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well then how come KIRO-TV has it when it's an American station? Also you, yourself moved some TV stations with the suffix -TV.Pikachu9000 00:29, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please compare this page with this page. These pages are queries of the FCC database. Please note that KIRO is listed as KIRO-TV and KBCB is listed as KBCB. In case you don't know, the FCC is the government body in the United States that regulates broadcast stations, they are also the group that assigns call letters to those stations. For various reasons they assign some TV stations call leters ending with -TV, and others without anything past the basic four letters. Yes, it would be easier if the FCC made all TV stations use call letters ending in -TV like Canada does, but they don't. And yes, it might be easier if Wikipedia has a naming convention that mandated all US TV stations be listed as W/Kxxx-TV, but that would be technicaly false in many cases. So until the FCC changes the regulations on call letters, or Wikipedia changes the naming convention, I will continue to rename TV station articles to the correct name. If you have any further questions about this topic, please leave a note on my talk page, as it was by a fluke that I noticed this comment. —A 06:59, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 
Talk:Transformers (2004 video game)

message: I retitled this because there are many TF games, including another one for the PS2 released in Asia. Evan1975 04:41, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Retitled "Transformers (Atari video game)"

message: I did a little reading, and found that the "Criticism" section is inaccurate.  While problems with the story, repetition, and controls were mentioned in reviews, they were usually considered minor, and the game was generally praised.   I suggest that the section either be taken out or turned into a "Reaction" section with the proper positive/negative format. - Kalarchis 05:21, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Look at Gamepot's average press reviews. The majority look above mediocre.69.242.146.41 18:01, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticisms
Talk:Batman: Dark Tomorrow

message: While the Xbox 360 features backward compatibility, only a little over half of Xbox games are compatible. So it's probably best to specify the ones that are not. I can imagine gamers trying out these kind of games on the newer console, only to be disappointed that they don't work. 2605:E000:2E42:A300:8446:F54:7925:FB82 (talk) 03:31, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incompatibility with Xbox 360 

message: In February 2021, Batman: Dark Tomorrow was included in Triple Jump's 'Worst Games ever' series on youtube. Remi-436 (talk) 02:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: . Not noteworthy. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 06:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 February 2021
Talk:Reiko (Mortal Kombat)

message: I've seen the scanned MK pages from Game Informer, and nowhere do I see any mention, fan speculation or otherwise, of Reiko being Kahn's son. Is this elsewhere in the issue, or just a total falsehood? Shadaloo 09:59, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reiko as Kahn's Son

message: To my best knowledge, there was no version of Mortal Kombat 4 for any incarnation of Game Boy.
Yes, there was. Shadaloo 05:11, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: MK4 on Gameboy

message: If someone would like to wade through the Reiko/Kahn section and properly reference it all, I found a fairly decent resource for it.  Enjoy. :-P EVula 15:31, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reiko/Kahn source
Category talk:Poker companies

message: In the light of the recent events in the US poker market (the FBI shut down three of the biggest Internet poker sites charging their owners with fraud and money laundering), I'd like to add some safe and regulated European poker rooms to the list: 24hPoker and NoIQ Poker. Pinkunicorns (talk) 17:18, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is for discussion of the category, like its relationship to other categories in the category tree.  Articles about individual cardrooms can be made and then included in this category, but the organizations have to meet the criteria of WP:N and/or WP:CORP, and issues relating to that should be handled on the article talk pages not here.  You can also check out WP:POKER and starts discussions about various stuff there. 2005 (talk) 23:06, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: To clarify - a category page is not a list of everything that fits within that category. It is an automatically-updated list of all pages that contain the relevant category tag. If the article doesn't contain the category tag (or hasn't been written!), then it won't be listed within the category. DS (talk) 15:09, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Branko Bokun

message: The article is peculiarly vague.  Where exctly does he come from?  What kind of writer is he?  Also, there are no references or sources, so that the minimal claims about his life are unverified. --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 10:05, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:2005TheOriginof the Mindsm.jpg, found on :Branko Bokun, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 18:08, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
Talk:Devil Kings

message: His accent sound more italian to me.Hitmaker 16:01, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Q-Ball

message: Hey guys, in SB2, I'm guessing the five are mercenaries. I saw them two times, on different places in different daimyo. I think it's funny adding them, they are more like the comic relief of the game.--MaskedRiderGatack 23:37, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The "Spear Rangers"

message: I need to confirm the elements of the ff: Nagamasa, Fuuma, and Imagawa. If anybody else plays the game, please confirm them. --MaskedRiderGatack 12:10, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Element help

message: As the main focus of this page is Sengoku Basara, it would make much more sense for "Devil Kings" to be the redirect and "Sengoku Basara" to be the main article. Devil Kings is only ever briefly mentioned here. Also, the Basara series keeps developing and adding more games, while Devil Kings remains to be only one game. --Iroha (talk) 05:37, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sengoku Basara versus Devil Kings

message: Do people think that the anime series should be ina seperate article? Given that this article is under the scope of the video games project, having the anime on the same page would create a conflict of project interests. Reply here for a general consensus.UKanime (talk) 23:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Anime Series

message: Even though Itsuki is described as "representing the Ainu tribe from Hokkaidō", she is not an Ainu. She is the member of a peasant uprising called Ikki 一揆 from Mutsu province (actual Aomori prefecture). Actually, if you play the Japanese game, you will notice that Ezo (Hokkaido) doesn't exist on the map.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.122.122.56 (talk) 13:08, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Itsuki and Ainu people
Talk:Aggression (poker)

message: "In general, opponents must respond to aggressive play by playing more loosely" - huh? If I was playing tight, aggressive poker, I would love it if someone would respond by playing more loosely. Usually you need to tighten up and/or be more aggressive. If you're folding hand after hand on the flop to aggression, it's probably that you're playing too many hands to begin with. Playing looser isn't going to help you. Play tighter, then re-raise some of those continuation bets. Anyone have a strategy book handy to use as a source? Stevage 03:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute 

message: "being too predictable is far worse than being too passive"
? being passive means being predictable..  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.178.252.63 (talk) 14:04, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ?
Talk:Bug (poker)

message: What value is the bug when it is used to complete a flush that already has an ace in it?  Is it played as another ace for a double ace flush, as the highest card currently not in hand, or as a non-value suit just to complete the flush?
:Highest card not in the hand. 2005 18:13, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's strange to me that Robert's Rules of Poker supports five aces outranking the royal flush. I agree with Cactus Kev (http://suffe.cool/poker/wildcard.html) - a wild card must represent a valid card from the deck that is not duplicated in the player's hand.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Factorial (talk • contribs) 01:07, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment 

message: Can anyone explain the exact value of the bug in California Lowball with and without an ace in hand? 121.58.220.31 (talk) 23:50, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: As the article says, "In California lowball, the bug is the lowest unpaired card in a hand."  The lowest possible card that is not also in the person's hand. 2005 (talk) 09:19, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: If the lowest card in a player's hand is 4, does the bug become a 3? 121.58.220.31 (talk) 10:06, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  If the lowest card in a hand is a 4, the joker becomes an ace, because it is the lowest possible card.  The joker is always an ace, unless the player already has an ace.  In that case the joker then it becomes a deuce, unless the player also has a deuce, then it becomes a 3, and so on.  In California lowball, the joker is simply the best possible card it can be in that particular hand.  There isn't anything complicated about it.  The joker becomes the lowest card that you do not have in your hand. 2005 (talk) 20:44, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  California Lowball 

message: At the very least a brief explanation of this should be at the glossary of poker terms. Currently there it just directs one to this main article on the headword. The main issue with sourcing this is that ideally the sources would have to be pre-2001, as likely later ones might well be derived from wikipedia. Sigh. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 14:51, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Searching Google Books shows loads of sources from before 2001 https://www.google.com/search?q=bug+wildcard+poker&hl=en&source=lnt&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A%2Ccd_max%3A2000&tbm=bks -- Tim Starling (talk) 21:05, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What to do with this article
Talk:Cyber Troopers Virtual-On Marz

message: Changed the phrase "tenth anniversary" to "ten year anniversary." I feel like the wording of "tenth" implies that the rerelease was made to commemorate the exact date while "ten years" implies that the game has existed now for 10 years. --H K Potton (talk) 11:55, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have also changed the 'game context' section to actually have a description of the game, rather than just saying "Its awesome read the rest." While funny, I don't think the previous description provided a good enough explanation of what the game is like --H K Potton (talk) 12:18, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

text: I might also remove the line "The game does not feature any means to play with 4-players, and thus, falls short of making full use of the design behind the Virtual On: Force game system and rules." It is a subjective statement and I don't think is necessary for the article. --H K Potton (talk) 12:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing the Wording
Talk:The Curse of Scotland

message: The article contained the text:
*This term was also used by stand-up comedian Colin Quinn on his comedy central program Tough Crowd as a reference to the "extremly small size" of Scottish men’s genitals.
I removed it and provided the summary Wikipedia is surely not a repository for individual jokes by individual comedians. I notice that it has been reinserted. Is this really worthy of an encyclopedia? bobblewik 07:28, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see it worth keeping. Nobody coming here and typing "curse of scotland" into the search box is doing it because of a single joke by a moderately famous comedian. It's not a famous joke, either, as a Google search for "curse of scotland" colin quinn turns up only this page. - dharmabum 00:53, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia is surely not a repository for individual jokes by individual comedians 

message: This page is a mere dictionary definition (something which Wikipedia is not).  It explains the meaning of a slang phrase and has several unconfirmed hypotheses of etymology.  Nothing here rises past what I would expect to read in a truly great unabridged dictionary.  The definitions and usage discussions belong over in Wiktionary where folks with the right skills, interests and lexical tools can more easily sort out the meanings and origins.
Options to fix the page here include:
# Expand the page with encyclopedic content - that is, content that goes well beyond the merely lexical.
# Redirect the page to a more general page on the appropriate sub-genre of slang.
# Replace the current contents with a soft-redirect to Wiktionary (usually done using the  template).
Pending a better answer, I'm implementing option 3 for now.  Rossami (talk) 03:45, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand, merge or redirect
Talk:Fear Effect

message: Check IMDB.
*Please provide some evidence that Uwe Boll is not directing.  All of my web searches have yielded no evidence he is no longer involved in the project.  IMDB no longer lists the name of the director, which is no proof that he is no longer associated with the film.  --Polkapunk 15:07, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Praise god! Uwe Boll to NOT direct! 

message: By the definition provided in the survival horror entry (and the fact that it isn't mentioned in said entry as a survival horror title), Fear Effect 1 & 2 should not be referred to as such.
Senjuro 15:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, Fear Effect was considered in many online and offline publications as part of the Survival Horror genre. This is made more prominent by the Resident Evil control scheme and general design as well as the final areas of the game itself. It does qualify. EliotAndrews 13:22, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a survival horror title
Talk:Draw (poker)

message: I boldly rewrote this article. original version. I removed 2nd person, some borderline-pov regarding how to play hands, added discussion of outs and computing probabilities for catching outs, dead outs, split discussion of inside/outside/double inside straight draws, and simplified the writing style to be more concise and easy to read. Big edit, so feedback welcome. --Toms2866 03:57, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It needed the rewrite.  Nice job. —Doug Bell talk•contrib 09:05, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article rewrite

message: I made this table comparing the probabilities of various backdoor draws to one-card draws. The point is to allow one-card and two-card draws to be easily compared in terms of outs. I was thinking of including it in the article but it seems a bit too much like OR. For what it's worth. Dcoetzee 00:40, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Backdoor draw table

message: This is so jargon ladened as to be almost unreadable to someone wanting to learn something on the subject. Could someone write this to be more approachable? --71.1.202.71 (talk) 16:28, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jargon 
Talk:Freeroll

message: I have come across this twice now. A poker server offers free entry to what it reasonably calls a "freeroll tournament", with cash prizes. The players each start with 1000 chips. But any time a player is knocked out (or maybe even when he isn't knocked out), he can buy another 1000 chips for $1. I can see this being very profitable for the house. Maybe it should be mentioned here? Maproom (talk) 17:48, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another way a freeroll tournament can profit the house
Talk:Die Hard Trilogy

message: I've removed the claim that 32X and Genesis versions of the game were planned. I was skeptical from the beginning that the developers would try to port a game which they thought couldn't be done without significant compromises on the Saturn onto the much less powerful 32X and Genesis. Reviewing the sourcing, I found only further reasons to be skeptical. The cited Mega Machines Sega article openly acknowledges that they have little in the way of concrete details. It seems rather unlikely that a journalist who isn't even sure what the game's concept is or who the developer is could have firm information on which platforms it's being developed for. Perhaps more importantly, I'm not seeing any mention of 32X or Genesis versions anywhere else, either in contemporary magazines or the extensive "Making of" article from Edge online which I'm preparing to add to the article.--Martin IIIa (talk) 02:07, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  32X and Genesis
Talk:In the money (poker)

message: Do we really need an article on this?  It is defined in the Poker jargon article, so isn't that enough? SmartGuy 20:12, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've got no objections to this being changed to a redirect. Essexmutant 23:38, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: redirect done SmartGuy 14:09, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Isolation (poker)

message: The pocket pair example is total nonsense. One should never try to isolate with a very small pocket pair because it needs very big implied odds to make up for the occasions when a face card flops.
:That's not necessarily true.  If there are significant blinds, and someone with a hand like KhQd puts in a raise, if 5s5c reraises and knocks out everyone else to isolate, the pair is about a 54% to 46% (assuming a call, if the KQ folds, even better).  So not only is the isolating good against the KQ, the pair gets its share of the equity of blinds/antes.  Additionally, there are differences between no limit and limit, between being all-in or having 100x the size of the pot. The example maybe should be removed, but not because it is wrong or nonsense.  It clearly could be right some of the time, but the point should be made in as non-confusing way as possible. 2005 (talk) 21:23, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pocket pair example 
Talk:Out (poker)

message: In Draw poker, one also hears the terms "12-way" or "16-way" straight draw for hands such as 6♥ 7♥ 8♠ (Joker), in which any of sixteen cards (4 fours, 4 fives, 4 nines, 4 tens) can fill a straight.
- I don't get it. How can those cards help here? Only an addition of both 4 and 5, or both 9 and 10 can help here. A single card, or combinations like 4 and 9 can't make a hand.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.221.56.166 (talk) 09:23, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistakes
Talk:Post-oak bluff

message: In their respective books, Super System (1979)  and Harrington on Hold'em, Vol. II (2005)  , both Doyle Brunson (the undisputed popularizer of the term) and Dan Harrington consistently write the term as "Post-Oak bluff". Though it can be found written both ways in a variety of mediums (mostly on the Web), it was originally scribed "Post-Oak bluff" by the man who introduced it to the world. Brunson is widely considered to be one of the (if not the) most highly respected figures in the poker world and Harrington stands alongside him amongst poker's most elite players. And their books are some of the most highly praised poker books in publication. I strongly recommend that the guys who introduced the rest of the world to the term be trusted with its correct spelling: "Post-oak bluff", not "post oak".  --Raoul Duke (talk) 03:50, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggest moving page to "Post-Oak bluff"

message: Having added references (with inline citations) to two very reputable books---which, together, can affirm all the information contained in the article---I have gone ahead and removed the notability, unreferenced, & unverified claims banners which were in place for just under a year (since May 2008). If there are any objections, please voice them for discussion. If I have time, I may try to include some additional references. Thanks.  --Raoul Duke (talk) 01:40, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed notability, unreferenced, & unverified claims banners

message: Anyone have an explanation regarding the term "post oak"? Timmypees 22:53, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: What else would we want to see in this page?  I don't think it's a stub.  Let's remove the stub comment.
--Limited Atonement (talk) 18:21, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub Designation