lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:TRINet (India coast)

message: TRINet (http://www.trinet.in) is an organization involved in the rehabilitation programmes of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. Based out of Chennai, India, TRINet is primarily in the domain of disseminating information on different facets of the rehab programme through its web site, newletters, conferences and seminars.
The material used in the Wiki page of TRINet is substantially based on the TRINet site, and permission for this is explicitly granted by TRINet.
:You have to confirm that the organization authorizes copying of its text by sending an email from an address associated with the organization to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.  Eventually, if all is in order, an OTRS clerk will place a clearance template on this page, and the article may then be restored. -- But|seriously|folks  06:31, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Could we turn "Trinet" into a disambiguation page for the other instances of the term? Right now there is also a TriNet (HR). Maybe the content on this page could be TRINet (development company) or some other term? And the disambiguation page would list both "Trinets" equally. Your thoughts? Lionelzivan (talk) 18:14, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation Proposal
Talk:Bellesrad

message: Hello,
Bellesrad seems to have switch to an other entity or its name have changed to "Bellesozaschita" 
see : http://www.bellesozaschita.by./ and at the bottom of https://www.mlh.by/en/our-main-activites/safety-and-security/radiatsionnaya-bezopasnost/
Xminor (talk) 13:46, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I will find some time to update wikipedia, both Bellesrad and Bellesozashchita (who else cares :-(.  - Altenmann >talk 02:39, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed
Talk:Byerazino

message: Hi,
I was born in Berazino, so when I went to Berazino page, I noticed Byerazino spelling. Is it possible to explaine where Byerazino is coming from? Rymabud (talk) 11:29, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Berehove

message: About the Berehove name change, the references in the name section are rather confusing. The first reference 1 talks only about that event (referendum), it doesn`t say anything about the pool results or any possible result. The second reference is also blurry 2. It also says about voting and it is clear that only the Hungarian population voted since the turnout was 47.76%. For a referendum to pass, it needs 50%+ turnout to be valid(if I am wrong please correct me). Placenames can be problematic. If this placename is really changed, to avoid any possible problems, it would be the best to provide clear references for this event. Adrian (talk) 06:56, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Berehove name change referendum 

message: Dear IP,
could you tell me why are you removing other names? Especially from the infobox, where traditionally several names are presented?(KIENGIR (talk) 11:21, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recurrent removal of names 

message: Currently, for the population number and a reference some weird Wikipedian code is used (Population: ). But a period cannot be introduced to it. What can be done?--Adûnâi (talk) 22:34, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punctuation
Talk:Beshankovichy

message: From the Jewish Encyclopedia:
Byeshenkovichi: Town in Latvia, formerly in the district of Lepelsk, government of Vitebsk, Russia, with a population which is four fifths Jewish of whom 576 are artisans. They have a synagogue, many houses of prayer, three benevolent societies, and numerous religious schools.
Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol 3, P. 449  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.183.18.175 (talk) 03:46, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Białystok Voivodeship (1975–1998)

message: This article has no central focus. It contains three areas:
* Białystok Voivodeship (1975-1998)
* Białystok Voivodeship (1921-1939)
* a historical section which has no relevance to the time periods discussed in the rest of the article.
What should happen:
* The 1921-1939 section is a duplicate of an existing page and should be deleted
* The historical section (and the links) should be moved to the history article or deleted
* The remainder of the page should be kept and renamed to Białystok Voivodeship (1975-1998)
Ajh1492 (talk) 02:56, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split Article
Talk:Buzhans

message: * "The Buzhans were last mentioned in the Primary Chronicle before their subjugation by Kievan Rus in 981." - You have an error! The text of the Primary Chronicle, is not  written - "... before their subjugation by Kievan Rus in 981." - Contemporary Fiction!
* Attention! Primary Chronicle (The tribal name of the Rus): "се бо токмо словѣнескъ ıѧзъıкъ в Руси:" - Only these Slavic tribes in Rus:  Polans; Drevlians; Novgorod(The Ilmen Slavs), Polochans, Dregoviches; Severians; Buzhans; Volynyane.  "..инии ıѧзъıци, иже дань дають Руси" - other tribes give tribute to Rus.
* Attention! - Polans; Drevlians; Novgorod, Polochans, Dregoviches; Severians; Buzhans; Volynyane. - it the tribal name of the Rus! Other tribes give tribute to Rus... - Nestor monk. Primary Chronicle.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.94.99.199 (talk) 20:39, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nestor didn't write it ...!
Talk:Carei

message: Since this is the ENGLISH section of the Wikipedia, I'll discuss this in English, even though the issue I'm trying to address here is caused by the Romanian (and possibly Hungarian) persons editing this page. 
This is supposed to be a scholarly description of Carei and its history. This is not a place for disseminating subversive ideas. There is enough chauvinistic propaganda going on in the regional media, the last thing Wikipedia needs is to become the ground of a political dispute. Refrain from a liberal use of adjectives and avoid jumping to conclusions and/or insinuating things such as "the poor Romanian peasantry was abused by the evil Hungarian nobility". Stick to the facts, they and only they will show the truth. 
But not just any facts. Filling the article with superfluous (and erroneous) information will not make it better. Here more is not always better except when talking about accuracy. And that, sadly, is mostly lacking. 
And if you take it upon yourselves to edit an English page, try to make sure that your contributions are at least grammatically (if not historically) accurate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.214.254.65 (talk) 07:14, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: More is not better

message: see wiki in Hungarian cities  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.112.27.242 (talk) 16:46, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  other names 
Talk:Chavusy

message: I think that the visit by Canadian Aid for Chernobyl to Chausy in 2006 is an important part of the city's history. Also, since it received said help, maybe a section about the impact of the 1986 Chernobyl disaster would be fitting.
A video log of the said visit is available at Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/ytaccountericmckenzie
--15000 Röntgen (talk) 13:41, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visit by Canadin Aid for Chernobyl in 2006
Talk:Chop, Ukraine

message: Hm, hm. Maybe try to look at the map and you´ll see, that the westernmost part of Ukraine land isn´t near Chop, but near Uzhhorod: http://www.mapy.cz/#mm=ZTtTcP@x=151246848@y=131127296@z=9
Here it looks like it should be Pallo (Mali Selmentsi or Solomonovo), which isn´t near Chop.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.49.113.96 (talk) 16:51, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Conservative Christian Party – BPF

message: An interesting fact is that the Party's website does not have any feedback from the party at all. There is no information on the party's website on how a citizen can join a party, or at least write a letter to the party. The website of the party does not contain any links to social networks. There is no information on the party's e-mail on the party's website.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.72.227.245 (talk) 23:59, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  site
Talk:Davyd-Haradok

message: The link to the sztetl.org.pl source is dead, and I was able to find neither an archived version (the "?=" at the end makes me think that part of the URL was omitted) nor a different version of the source on the same site (the current site's page on Davyd-haradok, in Polish and English, do not contain the information it was cited for). I did find an archived version of the moreshet.pl site, which I added to the citation, but since the entire page is in Hebrew, I was not able to understand it: could someone who understands Hebrew look at the source, confirm that it contains the information, and add additional info (translated title, author, perhaps a translated quote) to the citation? - 73.195.249.93 (talk) 05:35, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Bereza Kartuska Prison

message: Apparently the year this place opened, according to the table 70% of the inmates were Communists, 10% were far-rightists and 30% were Ukrainian nationalists.  Whilst it was perhaps possible to be two of these things simultaneously (either a a far-right or Communistic Ukrainian nationalist), this seems doubtful as the breakdowns for subsequent years do add up to 100%, which leads me to the conclusion that the statistics for 1934 are erronous.  2600:1004:B160:FF87:44B3:4AD8:9E33:4263 (talk) 23:52, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  1934 prisoner affiliations 

message: https://www.lrt.lt/naujienos/nuomones/3/162710/v-makariunas-makarevicius-sesiolika-dienu-lageryje-kartuzu-berezoje Lukteris (talk) 11:03, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What's your proposition? From what I see auther have spend couple days in Bereza in September 1939. The camp stopped working on Sep 18. Marcelus (talk) 14:01, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lithuanians in Bereza Kartuska
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Belarus

message: Considering Template:Bosniaks uses the 1991-1998 emblem, and considering the template is mostly about topics not related to the Government of Belarus, than id think it be a good idea to add it in. 🤓 WeaponizingArchitecture | scream at me 🤓 19:13, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replace the emblem on Template:Belarusians with the 1991-1995 Emblem 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Belarusian and Russian partisan movement (2022–present)#Requested move 28 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. voorts (talk/contributions) 04:13, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Belarusian and Russian partisan movement (2022–present)#Requested move 28 January 2024]] 

message: Please join the work on the content of Wikipedia:Stress marks in East Slavic words. - Altenmann >talk 12:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stress marks in East Slavic words 

message: Starting this July, we will see a new contest on the scene - the Developing Countries WikiContest (WP:DCWC)! Think of it as a WikiCup but only for articles and media on developing countries. 
Competitors may submit GAs, GTs, FAs, FTs, FLs, FPs, and DYK and ITN entries from/on developing countries to gain points and climb the leaderboard. Points are also awarded to those who review GAs, FAs and FLs.
Belarus is listed as a developing country for the purposes of this contest and articles related to it are eligible to be submitted for points, so I encourage everyone here to sign up and compete with editors from around the world to create high-quality content! 
Append your name to the DCWC signup page today! 
Best wishes, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (talk to me!/my edits) 07:05, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:DCWC|Developing Countries WikiContest]]
Talk:European Radio for Belarus

message: It should be clarified, that this "radio" is a propaganda subject. I'm not sure what is the best way to clarify it into the article, but it should be mentioned, because it is a commonly and well known fact. Many citizens wish that this station was closed down.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.241.64.235 (talk) 03:52, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propaganda radio station
Talk:Contact number

message: I suggest a redirect to coordination number as they are the same thing and the coordination number article has much more information. Phyesalis 04:25, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My bad. Sorry, I looked this up and I found the definition of CN read, "The contact number, or coordination number, of a given residue of a folded protein is defined as the number of Cβ (or Cα) atoms in other residues within a sphere around the Cβ (or Cα) atom of that given residue." Not being cranky, just didn't want you to think that I was a complete idiot. I see now that the article was published in Australia, maybe that's the source of my confusion? It's available here (full text, second paragraph): http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/6/248
Upon further reading, I see that coordination number is c.n. and contact is CN. Sorry for the mistake. This article is tagged for context. Perhaps you could provide some, as I clearly don't know what I'm talking about. Thanks for clearing that up. Phyesalis 03:32, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to coordination number 

message: How 175.107.237.43 (talk) 15:56, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I want to that I go in actress
Talk:Geography of Belarus

message: Merging into Geography of Belarus would allow for the reader to view the content in the context of Belarus's broader geography. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 05:29, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Against. The Geography of Belarus focuses on the natural geography, while the Cultural regions of Belarus is about culture instead of natural geography. Similar article divisions exist already, like Cultural regions of Lithuania or Cultural regions of Latvia. Cukrakalnis (talk) 09:22, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, given the uncontested objection and no support. Klbrain (talk) 07:48, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Cultural regions of Belarus]] into [[Geography of Belarus]]
Talk:Grodno Governorate

message: Please cease russification of this article. As an example, Brest-Litvosk is the best known name of the city in English because of it's association with the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk.
Please contribute original, productive material like expanding the list of Governors.
Ajh1492 (talk) 13:47, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please cease Polinization of this article. In Russian the city is known as Brest-Litovsky, the modern equivelant in given in brackets, the interim names can be found elsewhere in other articles. --Kuban Cossack (По-балакаем?) 12:21, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is English Wikipedia. I am using the common English-language terminology (like Brest-Litvosk). Ajh1492 (talk) 16:12, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Please cease russification of article on EN.WP and contribute new material.

message: Strange enough, this map is Polish, not English.--Lokyz (talk) 23:53, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: English map?
Talk:Guards unit (Soviet Union)

message: The name of the article is too generic. The combining of Soviet and post-Soviet units and formations in the article is redundant. Other then that, I see no reason for the article since Guard units are noted only for their individual awarding of the title that needs to be dealt with in the unit articles, since the Guard units were not significantly different from other field units and formations in other ways.--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 01:07, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the purpose of this article? 

message: the job of a Soviet guards unit, is to kill soldiers
who retreat or mutiny. CorvetteZ51 (talk) 11:56, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ummh... no. Not true. Reference for future readers: What the editor, CorvetteZ51, is refering to are called blocking formations. EyeTruth (talk) 23:40, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article completely false 

message: I've assessed as start because there is the basis of structure, proper citation and relevant supporting media.  However, Given the size of the subject, the content is skimpy and should be expanded. I have serious doubts about the title - this deals with only a very specific type of Soviet and Soviet-descended unit, whereas a casual user might expect to see a broader range of units through history even if only famous ones like British Guards or Napoleon's Old Guard. I would strongly recommend change for disambiguation.Monstrelet (talk) 18:32, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: MILHIST initial assessment
Talk:Baranavichy Radar Station

message: I wonder if this should be moved to Baranovichi radar as it's the more common name in English (I think). Secretlondon (talk) 19:37, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:History of Minsk

message: What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content. Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 13:35, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Timeline of Minsk]] 
Talk:Gomel Region

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Administrative divisions of Belarus which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 17:30, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Hola qué tal cómoHola qué tal cómodo  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.97.226.237 (talk) 14:46, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cómo hago para desbloquear un telefono krip k4 no tiene tecla en el medio
Talk:Khoiniki

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 13:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Khoyniki →  – Per WP:COMMONNAME. See Ngram for example. Mellk (talk) 22:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 March 2023 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 15:02, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Khoiniki →  – Per WP:BELARUSIANNAMES, this should follow BGN/PCGN romanization of Belarusian in the absence of a clear common name. In this case, there is no clear common name. For example, the number of results on Google for "Khoyniki" is greater than the number for "Khoiniki". Google Books returns not enough results for this to be used to determine the common name in English. Mellk (talk) 07:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Belarus has been notified of this discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 11:46, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2 January 2024
Talk:Košice-Barca

message: Somehow I doubt this relates to WikiProject Belarus... Demokratickid (talk) 02:29, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Kurapaty

message: Maybe the expansion should be based on them, either?Xx236 (talk) 07:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Belarus pages are longer than the Polish one 

message: Thousands of innocent people were murdered here, the mystery (details of these mssacres) has never been solved, and this article is so short.
Sad.
Zezen (talk) 16:33, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  So short
Talk:Likkutei Sichos

message: There are many other noteworthy individuals that contributed to Likkutei Sichos. I know Rabbi Leibel Shapiro from Tomchei Tmimim in Miami was greatly involved. As was Rabbi Minkowitz from Montreal.
Interesting note: I think Shlomo Carlbach's brother arranged the mafteach for the first 4 volumes.  Gavhathehunchback 06:18, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I never suggested otherwise. If you have solid info., please feel free to contribute it to the article. Yehoishophot Oliver 11:14, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please could someone summarise the general contents of the many volumes of Likkutei Sichos, eg. in terms of "Foundational concepts of Hasidus and its practical message for our generation: vol 1-4", "Rashi Sichos: vol..." etc. (from user:Yehoishophot Oliver)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daubmir (talk • contribs) 14:27, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

message: Please excuse my ignorance, but I fail to understand the reason behind the strange transliteration, and this is just one case amidst many. In Hebrew Language the name of this work is ליקוטי שיחות, which ought to be written in Roman letters as Likutei Sichot for the English-speaking world, with just one 'k' and an ending 't'. As the English language lacks a letter phonetically equivalent to the hebrew  (Heth or H̱et - IPA χ), a 'ch' is employed. When transliterating to the Spanish Language (for example) which has a fair share of Jewish and Arabic influences, the letter chosen would be a 'j', thus: Likutei Sijot. But the real problem is the ending 's' which is used instead of the very familiar letter 't', which is perfectly equivalent to Tav (), the last letter of the Modern Hebrew alphabet. I have found no help in articles like Romanization of Hebrew. Can anyone clarify? I find invented, non-existing words like 'Sichos' hard to digest. Thanks! --AVM (talk) 13:48, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd English transliteration 
Talk:Lyozna

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lightoil (talk) 10:09, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 December 2023
Talk:Minsk Region

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Administrative divisions of Belarus which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 17:30, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Minsk city needs to be be moved out of the infoboxes for both the regional and raion page.  It's been made very clear that Minsk City is a special municipality, and not a part of either the region or raion.  It can be mentioned that it still serves as the administrative center of both of these entities, but including Minsk City's population with that of the region and raion is not standard for Wiki for special cities carved out from other layers of administration. --Criticalthinker (talk) 14:20, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minsk City
Talk:Self-Defence of Lithuania and Belarus

message: In the Notes to Żeligowski's Mutiny the name of this formation is translated as the Self-Defense of Lithuania and Belarus. See:
7. ^(Polish) Grzegorz Łukowski and Rafal E. Stolarski, Walka o Wilno. Z dziejów Samoobrony Litwy i Bialorusi, 1918-1919 (The Struggle for Vilnius: the History of the Self-Defense of Lithuania and Belarus, 1918–1919), Adiutor, 1994, .
* Compare with Google search:   "Self-Defence of Lithuania and Belarus" – 28 results  (with mirrors)
— Raczko (talk) 05:45, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title