lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Provincetown Players

message: Please jump in and help this page.Cape cod naturalist 02:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007

message: The Van Vechten photograph looks to be of the wrong vintage with regard to the Wharf Theatre.
The 1921 photo of the Lewis Wharf is located at http://www.amrep.org/images/desire/Desire098.jpg
There was more than one Wharf Theatre in P'town. The Van Vechten pic looks like a more recent building than the shack used for O'Neill's "Bound East for Cardiff."
72.229.138.126 (talk) 03:45, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible error on Van Vechten Photograph 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.provincetownplayhouse.com/history.html and http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1542-734X.1984.0703_65.x/abstract. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Voceditenore (talk) 10:38, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: EDOrt (talk) 20:03, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Educational Assignment 

message: Is this relevant? Taken myself the rights are yours.
Asiplas (talk) 09:52, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Provincetown Theater Sign
Talk:Venous leak

message: does anyone know if venous leakage can be corrected24.54.73.147 02:08, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Talk:Bill Saluga

message: : Why on earth is the word "television" hyperlinked in this article? Is there anyone on the planet who has Internet service but doesn't know what television is?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.126.226.142 (talk) 11:56, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The only Ace Trucking Company that has an article on Wikipedia is a comic book series, not Saluga's comedy troupe. I've thus unlinked the reference. Even if the comic is named for the troupe (I am unfamiliar, so I don't know), that does not make linking to the former as the latter appropriate. KaminoNeko (talk) 06:04, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if that page did or didn't reference the sketch comedy troupe in 2012, but it does now. In the header of the page, it states that the comic's name was taken from the troop, and also lists the performers by name. I do agree however, that the linking from Bill Saluga's page should not go to that one. Fgoron2000 (talk) 14:41, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On an episode of the SCTV Network that aired on December 11, 1981 on NBC, the primary sketch through the show was a Godfather parody. In the scene where all the heads of the major networks were introduced, one of them was Raymond J. Saluga, head of PBS. I couldn't tell, but it did look like Bill Saluga. There's no reference on the SCTV Guide website, none on IMDB, none here on Wikipedia. Does anybody know if it was or wasn't him?
Fgoron2000 (talk) 14:32, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearance on SCTV? 

message: Someone should add to this article talking about his scammy company Raycon. 2601:84:4501:78E0:416D:FBB8:487:86C8 (talk) 01:49, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raycon
Talk:Mitsurugi

message: How come there isn't a main picture? There used to be one for every character. Silver Fang 07:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: I edited the third paragraph in the biography section.
Reasons:
[*] It stated the Takeda Calvary was wiped out, but it made no mention of the actual historical event. So I linked it to the actual Battle of Nagashino so those who wanted to learn about it can do so.
[*] The Takeda linked to Takeda Shingen, who was in no way involved in the Battle of Nagashino. By linking it to Shingen, it makes it seems as he was leading the cavalry, but anyone with knowledge of the Sengoku era knows that Shingen was dead by this time and his son Katsuyori had taken over. Instead of linking to him, I linked it to the Takeda family since it belonged to the clan and not one individual.
[*] Fixed a spelling error
I also linked to Nobunaga and Kenshin, incase anyone reading this wanted to know who they were. And plus, it links to him and Hideyoshi lower on in the page.
67.182.0.37 05:20, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited third paragraph 

message: If nobody corrects that before next month, I will.--Kim Kusanagi 19:28, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mitsurugi means Royal Sword 

message: Okay, this is pretty much just like the old character analysis section from before. I'm removing these for the same reason people from before deleted the character analysis section. If you want to find out why, check out Taki's and Kilik's talk pages. If people want a strategy guide, they should go to fansites. Mythmonster2 (talk) 06:25, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gameplay
Talk:The Big Money

message: The Big Money is a Web site from the Slate Group that publishes Slate (magizine) and others. Notable authors that appear in Wikipedia are sometimes featured.  It focuses on all aspects of economics and money.  I suggest that this article be titled The Big Money (song) to make possible an article on The Big Money (magazine)
172.129.41.21 (talk) 08:16, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Big Money Magizine from The Slate Group
Talk:Caretaker Gazette

message: ===VFD===
On 22 March 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Caretaker Gazette for a record of the discussion. – ABCD 01:57, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion record

message: On 22 March 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Caretaker Gazette for a record of the discussion. – ABCD 01:57, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VFD

message: On 18 June 2007, this article was nominated for deletion review. The result was Deletion overturned. See here for a record of the discussion. IronGargoyle 15:46, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DRV
Talk:Castner's Cutthroats

message: huh?
whats going on here? MrMacMan 02:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you specify what you're wondering about? --Yksin 23:19, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: dose eny one know if the army still has units like this one?
The only unit in existance today that I know of is the Civil Air Patrol as they are civilians recruited by the Air Force, they operate independantly although they no longer function in a combat role, and they often utilize their personal knowledge of local terrain to function. Redland19 (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 

message: Not clear how to drain a marsh by damming it..
Mydogtrouble (talk) 13:18, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dam 
Talk:Canonical units

message: Hey I created this page because though I stumbled upon this term in my reading, a page for canonical units did not exist on wikipedia, to my surprise. I am by no means an expert in the field of astrodynamics or astronomy but I thought I could help introduce the page. I hope this page will be of some use to aspiring aerospace engineers
Subheight640 02:26, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Hey all,
Just a quick spot of what I think might be an issue: on the page it refers to the following criterion for a canonical triplet:
I think it's highly likely that the intended text in the overview would not refer to the canonical distance unit twice, so I am adjusting it to the following:
If this wasn't an error, feel free to change it back (although I would be interested to learn what it actually is trying to say.)
Darealmoonman (talk) 07:20, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparent issue in the canonical triplet definition in the overview.
Talk:MS Veendam

message: Might anyone have any information on the SS Veendam, which in 1923 was providing service between Boulogne-sur-Mer, France, and New York City? --Thisisbossi 02:28, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wonder when she was built. HAL/Carnival may be hiding that fact? I can't find any info before she was retrofitted with the her new stern and rooms, etc. Her prow and general lines look more like the sleek classical transatlantic ocean liners' than the silly modern cruise ship's bobbing-hotel look. I sailed on her before Carnival, around 1979 from Miami thru the Caribbean on a 2-week. You'd think from the propaganda uhm... I mean official literature, that she didn't exist even then. Silly wabbits!  
* Ship Facts [from HAL/Carnival website] ms Veendam
* Ship's Registry:  The Netherlands
* Passenger capacity:  1,350
* Crew members:  580
* Gross Tonnage:  57,092 grt.
* Length:  719 feet
* Beam:  101 feet
* Maximum speed:  22 knots
* Dedicated:  January 1996, by actress Debbie Reynolds
Doug Bashford--68.127.81.33 (talk) 20:05, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: ''SS Veendam''

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: page moved.  Andrewa (talk) 15:42, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: MS Aegean Majesty →  – The 2020 move to Aegean Majesty was premature and undiscussed; ship has remained laid up with no plans to be put into operation under that name. By far the best known name is Veendam, under which it cruised for 24 years, per NC-SHIP, which is a reasonable application of WP:COMMONNAME, and WP:NAMECHANGES in particular, to ships, where ephemeral and temporary name changes are commonplace. Davidships (talk) 14:31, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

text: Support as per proposers points Lyndaship (talk) 15:44, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

text: Support per proposal. Until a ship actually sails under a name, page should not have been moved. Llammakey (talk) 20:26, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 31 December 2022
Talk:Daxcon

message: Aullbw 02:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Yosef Blau

message: I have clicked on all the links and don't think they belong on this page.  They do all quote Rabbi Blau, but only briefly.  They are more appropriate on the accused molesters pages. Danthecan (talk) 05:09, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Enigma message 05:40, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do External Links belong? 

message: I also don't think we should accept an Awareness Center-slanted version of his career. His official bio at Yeshiva University doesn't say a word about his "activism" for the abused -- he never did more than sit on Polin's board until the facts started to come out. He certainly was not "instrumental" in any of the cases quoted on the page, by anyone's standard. It is typical unsourced Awareness Center material and not appropriate for inclusion. SunAlsoRises (talk) 23:12, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Career
Talk:Arpeggione Sonata

message: The recording of this piece by Nicolas Deletaille and Alain Roudier on period instruments is available on Youtube at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=do9UgdfwM5Q. It has been there for ages and is placed there by a user account Nicolas Deletaille, so the obvious explanation is it's there with full knowledge of the performer. Would it be appropriate to add this as an external link? I wouldn't normally add a specific recording of a specific piece, but in this case it's rather exceptional because it's the only serious bit of music for Arpeggione, almost no one will ever have heard one played (or seen one), and recordings of the Arpeggione in action are hard to come by. Elemimele (talk) 19:43, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I would prefer to add a professional recording such as this one. intforce (talk) 11:28, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

text: ... or the historic first  --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:39, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletaille/Roudier recording
Talk:Flahavan

message: Talk:Flahavan 
I'd like to know the reasons for deletion.
As far as I can tell, it's a total nonsense article about an, either a word that doesn't exist or is irrelevantly arcane (for example, a google search of the word appears to yield no reference to it).  It's also badly written. Lordjeff06 02:58, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've turned this page into a disambiguation page for the surname Flahavan, as I cannot locate any reliable sources to verify that the term is used how it was described. While the term may indeed be used, please remember that the threshold for inclusion within Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. Kyra~(talk) 23:10, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambig
Talk:Aston by Wrenbury

message: #Stub needs to be massively expanded.(See Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements for guidance.)
#Infobox needs to be added. (see Template:Infobox UK place/doc‎ for guidance.)
#Make sure that References and Citations are added as the article is expanded. (See WP:References, [[WP:V], and WP:CITE for guidance.)
 DDStretch  (talk) 20:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 
Talk:Mega Duck

message: LR35902 is based on Intel 8080, not Zilog Z-80 - the fact that LR35902 has some few Z-80 opcodes implemented doesn’t make it as Z-80 compatible, since it lacks lots of essential Z-80 features, like IX and IY resgisters and etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nitrofurano (talk • contribs) 20:25, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Zilog Z80 or Intel 8080?? Gobrona (talk) 20:34, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

text: The discrepancy still remains today. --Mbrickn (talk) 01:39, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: See https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/11816/is-the-game-boy-sharp-lr35902-object-compatible-with-the-8080-z-80 Polluks ★ 11:34, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  MegaDuck and GameBoy uses Intel 8080, not Zilog Z-80
Talk:Boulby Quarries

message: Hello! 
This bot has detected that this page contains an image, :Image:Uk_outline_map.png, in a raster format. A replacement is available as a Scalable vector graphic (SVG) at :File:British_Isles_United_Kingdom.svg. If the replacement image is suitable please edit the article to use the vector version. Scalable vector graphics should be used in preference to raster for images that can easily represented in a vector graphic format. If this bot is in error, you may leave a bug report at its talk page Thanks SVnaGBot1 (talk) 10:47, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Image:Uk_outline_map.png]] 
Talk:Briarcroft Pasture

message: This bot has detected that this page contains an image, :Image:Uk_outline_map.png, in a raster format. A replacement is available as a Scalable vector graphic (SVG) at :File:British_Isles_United_Kingdom.svg. If the replacement image is suitable please edit the article to use the vector version. Scalable vector graphics should be used in preference to raster for images that can easily represented in a vector graphic format. If this bot is in error, you may leave a bug report at its talk page Thanks SVnaGBot1 (talk) 15:05, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Image:Uk_outline_map.png]] 
Talk:Cowpen Marsh

message: This bot has detected that this page contains an image, :Image:Uk_outline_map.png, in a raster format. A replacement is available as a Scalable vector graphic (SVG) at :File:British_Isles_United_Kingdom.svg. If the replacement image is suitable please edit the article to use the vector version. Scalable vector graphics should be used in preference to raster for images that can easily represented in a vector graphic format. If this bot is in error, you may leave a bug report at its talk page Thanks SVnaGBot1 (talk) 15:05, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Image:Uk_outline_map.png]]
Talk:Hart Bog

message: This bot has detected that this page contains an image, :Image:Uk_outline_map.png, in a raster format. A replacement is available as a Scalable vector graphic (SVG) at :File:British_Isles_United_Kingdom.svg. If the replacement image is suitable please edit the article to use the vector version. Scalable vector graphics should be used in preference to raster for images that can easily represented in a vector graphic format. If this bot is in error, you may leave a bug report at its talk page Thanks SVnaGBot1 (talk) 15:06, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Image:Uk_outline_map.png]]
Talk:Hartlepool Submerged Forest

message: Hello! 
This bot has detected that this page contains an image, :Image:Uk_outline_map.png, in a raster format. A replacement is available as a Scalable vector graphic (SVG) at :File:British_Isles_United_Kingdom.svg. If the replacement image is suitable please edit the article to use the vector version. Scalable vector graphics should be used in preference to raster for images that can easily represented in a vector graphic format. If this bot is in error, you may leave a bug report at its talk page Thanks SVnaGBot1 (talk) 10:48, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Image:Uk_outline_map.png]]
Talk:Langbaurgh Ridge

message: This bot has detected that this page contains an image, :Image:Uk_outline_map.png, in a raster format. A replacement is available as a Scalable vector graphic (SVG) at :File:British_Isles_United_Kingdom.svg. If the replacement image is suitable please edit the article to use the vector version. Scalable vector graphics should be used in preference to raster for images that can easily represented in a vector graphic format. If this bot is in error, you may leave a bug report at its talk page Thanks SVnaGBot1 (talk) 15:04, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Image:Uk_outline_map.png]] 

message: None of the references, links etc for this page work any longer. Geopersona (talk) 09:12, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  non-working URLs
Talk:IWI Negev

message: May this photo: http://images.wikia.com/nazizombiesplus/images/9/9a/Negev_NG7.jpeg  be uploaded and used here?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roiosdonos (talk • contribs) 16:57, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

message: The intro says 1995, while the 'Users' list 1997.  Which is it?--Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs)  21:23, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The date given in the users list (1997) cites a source, and the date in the infobox (1995) is unsourced. I changed the infobox date to agree with the sourced date. ROG5728 (talk) 20:02, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks for the update.--Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs)  17:09, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adoption date? 

message: I added a popular section referencing the Negev's image in Counter Strike: Global Offensive. I have no direct citation right now but it can be cited.--JohnAndersonian (talk) 19:54, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That isn't noteworthy. Please see the pop culture guidelines at WP:GUNS. ROG5728 (talk) 23:30, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular culture 
Talk:Global Energy Network Institute

message: This article was previously listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion and deleted - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Energy Network Institute for the discussion. However, since both delete votes were based on a lack of notability being demonstrated, I am satisfied that this recreated article should be kept, since the "Selected Media References" section clearly shows that GENI has been "the subject of multiple, non-trivial, reliable published works, whose sources are independent of the subject itself", as per Wikipedia:Notability. --Stormie 03:40, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Except that they do no such thing. GENI claims it has references, but there's not a single link or specific enough reference except to their own website. Not even close to being appropriate and/or reliable references. --Calton | Talk 00:27, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well  has links to reproductions of the various references they claim. Could have a poke through there to see whether they are actual coverage of GENI, or just passing mentions. --Stormie 01:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

message: is totally non encyclopedic and will be removed; it may be replaced by references to such statements, formatted according to WP:NOTE. Otherwise it looks like a prospectus, not an encyclopedia article. 
As for the references section, it too must be reformatted properly as references, not a paragraph.DGG (talk) 03:51, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The current endorsements section
Talk:Nashville, Georgia

message: If you would like to know why I assessed the article the way I have, please use my talk page. Ethan (talk) 04:38, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: There has been an annonymous user, 75.111.114.111, that has been adding the same sentence for a while now: “The city is most famous for being the boyhood home of Donald Christian Steitz, founder of the Xionity religion.” Can anyone verify this? I've added user warning templates to his talk page for now. Ethan (talk) 15:23, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Xionity Religion
Talk:Karl Ernst

message: I've found a date of September 17, 1933 for his wedding, if this is correct, it seems unlikely that the couple were on honeymoon, especially since that phrase infers the exercise of connubial rites, that Mr. Erst would probably have found egregious. It would also mean the description of his 'spouse' as his "...new wife" is misleading. Is it possible to address this issue, with details such as: the date of his wedding and the name of his bride?146.90.80.210 (talk) 19:37, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honeymoon? 

message: Why the facr that hh's been a bouncer at a gay nightclub makes this linkable to the LGBT portal?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.39.21.2 (talk) 19:06, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  LGBT?
Talk:Jack the Ripper, Light-Hearted Friend

message: This article needs to be deleted. This is a load of crap. I'm not a fan of Alice in Wonderland or Lewis Carroll and I believe that Carroll may well have been perverted sexually but the idea that he was Jack the Ripper is ridiculous. --Prb4 03:44, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is an encyclopedia, not a rant about whatever you want. The article mentions that a book was released and explains what was in it and why it's not taken seriously. There's no reason to delete it. 216.165.158.7 09:46, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

text: This article does not need to be deleted... you need an actual reason to put something up for deletion. You don't have one other than not liking it. The article is sourced, is about a topic that made headlines worldwide when it was released, gives full info on the topic, etc. DreamGuy (talk) 14:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

message: The standard for notability for books is "multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the book itself", "a major literary award", being made into a film, and a couple of others not applicable here.  None of these seem to apply.  Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 20:51, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability