Talk:Time Cube/Archive 14

message: For those of us that have argued with Time Cube Guy and wondered whether he's serious or just trolling, he now has a video of himself on his website: 
Judge for yourself. At the very least its interesting to finally see and hear the guy who was once causing so much trouble here. Cheradenine 05:30, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How do we know it's Time Cube Guy? Besides that... I think I just got a bit more confused as to whether or not this guy is serious. — Ambush Commander(Talk) 17:45, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

text: I am pretty sure it's the same guy. He has been active for years on various Time Cube forums...I can't think of anyone else who has gone to such length to comprehend Time Cube.King Mob 18:09, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that Cheradenine has visited the [spam removed]. This version includes a [spam removed]. Kosebamse has already expressed a desire to suppress this new website—for as we all know, Time Cube is ineffable truth.
Personally, I think his accent is a mix of australian and disabled, but I only think that because I've personally dealt with Cubehead and he's a heavily bias hypocrit. I reiterate that that is a completely personal opinion.
All I want now is just pure, hardcore fact, not ineffable truth. Plus, if it were ineffable truth, would it be not only a lost truth, but an impossible truth because the truth would have to be discovered, from scratch, by each person seperately? Serious question. Maybe timecube is just the realization that other people live on this planet, which just so happens to rotate? --Duckmurderer 08:56, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Having met Time Cube Guy in person (assuming that he is the maintainer of the site that he links to), it's still hard to say whether it's a mix of Australian and disabled or simply Australian and shy.  Anyway if any of you are interested in speaking about him by name rather than by title, he is -- and he is enroled in the same university course as my sister.  She states that she has seen him damage university property repeatedly and that he regularly convulses during class.  This may all be simply a cry for attention, but it's not my place to say whether he's actually ill.  --202.164.194.254 09:50, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time Cube Guy 

message: Regarding a recent edit description, "→Parodies - links to that site not allowed per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/MONGO/Workshop", the document cited there is a workshop page for a proposed arbitration decision, not an actual Wikipedia policy.  In fact, the discussion on that page indicates that the concept of banning all links to that site is highly disputed even among the abritrators, and no final decision has yet been reached.  Hence, enforcing this nonexistent policy does not make sense.  On the other hand, I'm not sure if the ED link in question is suitably notable, so I'm not restoring it. *Dan T.* 14:43, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to ED not allowed? 

message: The fourth attempt to delete Time Cube from Wikipedia has failed, and the article has been kept. My gratitude extends to all the beneficent Wikipedians who have courageously taken this worthwhile action! You have contributed to the ultimate salvation of humanity. Time Cube is the truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Time Cube Guy (talk • contribs) 
:I say, let's keep this paragraph so everyone visiting the page can see what Time Cube's most vocal proponent has to say.  This is known as "giving him enough rope to hang himself by", and will undoubtedly convince anyone who was undecided that Time Cube really is a load of old cobblers ;-) Dave-ros 09:28, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: please, tranq him, bring him down then medicate him, i really feel sorry for his brain stuck in these crazy loops, hees in a scary place and needs ur help 89.241.30.167 00:34, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hail to humanity's mighty glorious Cubic future!!! 

message: From the lead paragraph:
:Followers of Time Cube are known as "Cubicists" or "Cubics".
Is there any evidence that this statement is correct? Google finds 18 unique pages which contain mentions of "Cubicists", all mirrors of this page, wikipedia based spam pages ("Time cube google toolbar", anyone?) or talk pages on graveyardofthegods. Significantly fewer than some less kind names for "followers of timecube" I searched for. I'm going to take this out unless anyone has any (sensible) objections. Anilocra 17:03, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm not sure anyone is crazy enough to be considered a "follower" in any rationalist sense, unless it's someone mocking the site for ironic purpose. --ElaragirlTalk|Count 00:23, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I am  pretty sure everyone who has followed the evolution of this page agrees that at least one "follower" exist.Tranqulizer 18:36, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Followers of timecube... (?!) 

message: I have reverted this edit. The section has long been in the article and I have not seen any relevant discussion that explains its removal. Please discuss before making such drastic changes. Kosebamse 07:35, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mass deletion reverted 

message: Looks like this article needs a "lack of neutrality" or "barely concealed contempt" tag. Yeah, okay, maybe there are only two people in the world who believe Time Cube has any credibility, but the the purpose of Wikipedia is not to provide a place for people to ridicule the beliefs of others, no-matter how crazy they are. -Groveller 09:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impartiality 

message: is the disclaimer in the external links neccecary? I thought disclaimers were generally redundant because of some small print somewhere.... except for spoilers. Blueaster 05:23, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nature's Harmonic TruthCube disclaimer&mdash;truly necessary? 

message: Another page to keep an eye on:  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by WikianJim (talk • contribs) 17:25, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TimeCubeGuy on simple 

message: From what I've read, time cube can be easily related to relativity (albeit, an extremely watered down and stupid version). There isn't any exact way that you could determine day x has ended and day y has begun, in time cube. That means every observer from a given point will have a different frame of reference as to the beginning and end of a certain day. That's fairly close to to what Einstein predicted with time dialation, if I remember correctly. Popisfizzy 20:41, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relativity and time cube