Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Baltimore

message: What about Newark with its Pro-Cathedral of Saint Patrick in Newark and Cathedral of the Sacred Heart Basilica, Newark? Joshuaschroeder 04:57, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: One could make the same argument with St. Louis, since it has the Old Cathedral and the New Cathedral.  However, the Old Cathedral is technically no longer a cathedral since it no longer has a cathedra.  We can apply the same standard to Newark.  If there is still a cathedra in the Pro-Cathedral, then Newark would qualify.  However, pro-cathedral means "temporary cathedral," so I'm going to guess that since the completion of Sacred Heart, Saint Patrick no longer has a cathedra.  Since I've never been to the place, though, I could be wrong. Pmadrid 06:41, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Only two cities?

message: :Image:AOBSeal.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:23, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:AOBSeal.jpg

message: The article is careful to make the distinction that the diocese is the oldest in the US as its border were at any given time. Could someone add which ones with in the current borders of the US are older? -Rrius (talk) 03:35, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: To obtain some answers to your question, you might want to reach out to a larger audience (of fellow editors/users) by posting your question on the talk page at List of the Catholic dioceses of the United States. Merry Christmas. Eagle4000 (talk) 17:15, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oldest diocese 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Baltimore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080724200915/http://archbalt.org/our-history/index.cfm to http://www.archbalt.org/our-history/index.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:52, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I added the word "Other" to exclude those already listed as bishop of the diocese or as coadjutor or as auxiliary.  I made some changes which I will list in the next paragraph, but I have a question as to how the order of this listing was determined.  I see it's not alphabetical, and it is not QUITE chronological; did you mean for it to be chronological?  As far as I am concerned, if I "inherit" a chronological listing, that's OK; however, I did anonymous editing for other dioceses where I had to erect such a list from scratch, and when I have done that, I have used alphabetical order and listed each man's 1st assignment as bishop, and not later assignments (although I will mention becoming a cardinal).
Today, in this list for the Baltimore archdiocese, I did not change the order of listing despite my question above.  HOWEVER, I had to fix the chronological order for Thomas Becker (he was Bishop of Wilmington and THEN of Savannah), and had to note Spencer as auxiliary (NOT the Archbishop) for the Military. For Philip Hannan, I added the years of service in the Baltimore archdiocese (I understand it was called Baltimore-Washington at the time), and I do this when the ending date is not the beginning of his service elsewhere as bishop. (Philip Hannan was not yet a bishop in 1947; he switched over to Washington when that archdiocese and Baltimore received separate archbishops, then he became auxiliary bishop of Washington in 1956.)
Carlm0404 (talk) 20:22, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  list of Other Affiliated Bishops 

message: I added that in the text as another territory loss of this Archdiocese.  Sorry I forgot to comment in the editing section.  DC was formed from parts of Maryland and Virginia, and the Virginia part was returned to that state in 1846, but that action could not change diocese boundaries, so that piece of Virginia stayed in the Baltimore Archdiocese at that time. Carlm0404 (talk) 05:41, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Piece of Virginia in 1846 and 1850 

message: We have decided, at WikiProject Catholicism, that parishes and schools be removed from diocesan articles per WP:NOT (Wikipedia is not a directory). It leads to bloat and long article length. Thank you for understanding. Elizium23 (talk) 22:15, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: * Elizium23 (talk) 22:16, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parishes removed 

message: It is being reported that the Archdiocese of Baltimore has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to impending sexual abuse lawsuits. https://www.thebaltimorebanner.com/community/religion/archdiocese-of-baltimore-bankrupcy-NUAADGKF6FAO3EEUMSLCIZZ3SE/ 142.162.123.252 (talk) 20:07, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archdiocese bankruptcy 

message: Moved Netflix reference to "Popular Culture" section, but maybe "Media portrayal" would be a better header in line with how organizations are labeled. If someone could provide some direction on this, that would be cool. Magjozs (talk) 23:42, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular Culture or Media Portrayal