lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Micro lathe

message: I take issue with the wording and content of the article.  Microlathes are not capable of what anyone in the manufacturing industry would call "incredible" speed or accuracy, and certainly not enough to warrant mentioning.  Not mentioned in the article is that movement controlled in thousandths of an inch is the standard on English machine tools of any size.  Movement in ten-thousandths of an inch is now a standard feature on modern CNC tooling many times the size of large bench lathes.  The article makes it appear as though turning to a thousandth of an inch is a feat rather than a fairly low expectation.  Additionally, the small size of the tool is a hindrance to accuracy, as low weight and thin castings do not absorb shock or prevent twisting under load.  Small lathes often do not have spindle speeds higher than 3000 rpm or so, which prevent small turning at an appropriate speed. Again, many larger CNC lathes have more resilient and faster bearings which will allow spindle speeds in excess of 10k rpm.  Heat is another issue in this article.  Small parts with low-horsepower cuts do not generate the heat a large lathe will generate during operation.  A microlathe may produce a part that is warm for several minutes; the part does not have the mass to retain heat.  However, a 500 lb casting on a larger machine, undergoing 15-20 horsepower cuts will remain hot for hours.
Microlathes are hobby machines for use in steam models and other similar pursuits, not well suited for commercial prototyping or production.  While this type of machine may be beneficial to a small set of commercial users, the most popular lathe for small prototype work is the HLV-H and its clones.  Not at all a micro lathe. - Toastydeath 02:57, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'll try to clean up the wording - wasn't meant to compare the accuracy to large CNC machines, more along the lines of ' they are capable of incredible accuracy considering their size and weight" but I will change the text to something along the lines of 'considering their size and weight, they are still capable of high accuracy". some microlathes do have motors and step-up gearing to allow 7000K rpm and higher. Toastydeath, feel free to change the text so it reads accurately in your eyes. Statisticalregression 02:01, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues with wording in current article 

message: I suggest generalizing this article into "Miniature machine tools", because it could easily cover both microlathes and micromills, as well as other misc small machine tools. However, I may not get around to doing this for a while. But it's a good idea for the future. — ¾-10 17:31, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: sounds like a good idea to me. I'm super busy over the holidays but if the change is made I will do my best to contributeStatisticalregression (talk) 23:44, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I suggest generalizing this article into "Miniature machine tools"
Talk:Dominus (title)

message: For merge discussion, please see: Talk:Don_(honorific)#Merger_of_"Dom",_"Don",_and_"Dominus". PPEMES (talk) 23:27, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: The etymology of "dame" from "domina" through Old French can be found on Google's dictionary by searching "etymology of dame". Google indicates that this is from the Oxford English Dictionary, but as I don't have a subscription, I can't check that to cite it. If someone else would like to do so it'd be much appreciated. It's not as good as finding a French source showing the etymology of "madame", but my search for such has been in vain. Dimitriye98 (talk) 07:09, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology of "ma'am / madam" 

message: The article used to contain the sentence "The honorific Dominus was also a title of honor in Polish-Lithuanian Republic." This was unsourced, and moreover, aside from finding no quality sources, I could find no reference to it anywhere else, so I've removed it. If anyone can find information on this, it seems relevant to both this page and potentially the page on the former state in general. Dimitriye98 (talk) 11:35, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polish-Lithuania
Template talk:Walking with

message: Why is this a CVG (computer + video game) template? --Cuddly Panda 08:38, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Some editor keeps adding Space Odyssey (TV series) as a "related" program.  It doesn't have "Walking with" in the title; it's not about prehistory, or animals at all. Such shows are correctly included in Template:Impossible Pictures but not here. Barsoomian (talk) 03:38, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that editor was me. Did you read the article? It says: "The film had initially been titled Walking with Spacemen due to the involvement of Tim Haines, the creator of the Walking with Dinosaurs series. This title was eventually dropped as Space Odyssey had little in common with the Walking with . . . series." And about the title: Primeval, Prehistoric Park, Ocean Odyssey, etc. are related WITHOUT "Walking with" in the title. Just like Planet Dinosaur which is really not the part of it. Who the hell said that? What are PD doing in the WW series? And why Ocean Odyssey is in the template if Space ODYSSEY isn't? You are inscrutable. --Primeval (talk) 19:02, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for confirming and citing that "Space Odyssey had little in common with the Walking with . . . series."  This is the "Walking with" template, not the "Tim Haines" template. PD isn't a "WW..." series, in the "Television series" section, but the "Related", as it was clearly inspired by the original WWD, involves some of the same people,  and was promoted as such. "Space Odyssey" is no more "related" than any other Impossible Pictures production. That has its own template. "Ocean Odyssey" is marginal, it's CGI wildlife, but not prehistoric,  I didn't put it in but if you feel strongly, go ahead and remove it. Barsoomian (talk) 03:07, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Space Odyssey
Talk:Donald Grant Mitchell

message: Can you clarify why you think this article should be located at Donald Grant Mitchell rather than Ik Marvel? Your edit summary notes, correctly, that Mitchell was his real name, but article titles don't always need to be real names; instead, we use the name that is most commonly used. It's not a perfect measure, but "Donald Grant Mitchell" gives me 35,400 Google hits while "Ik Marvel" gives me 234,000. It's conceivable though that "Mitchell" is more commonly used in reliable sources. Also pinging DragonflySixtyseven who moved the page in the other direction last August. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:41, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: For me "Donald Grant Mitchell" gives 101k, "Donald G. Mitchell" gives 90K, and "Donald G Mitchell" (75k) compared to "Ik Marvel" (97k). Obviously there's overlap between all of these. Britannica has him under "Donald Grant Mitchell," Google Books lists all of his books under that name, the one biography I found has "Donald G. Mitchell" in the title. I changed it because I came across one of his books, bylined Donald G. Mitchell. GordonGlottal (talk) 19:51, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: "Eric Blair" redirects to "George Orwell" rather than vice versa. George Eliot... George Sand... George Bellairs... George Bagby... (I'm sure that there multiple non-George examples). DS (talk) 19:53, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: NY Times obit as "Ik Marvell". Also, do you realize how many different people are named "Donald G. Mitchell", etc? DS (talk) 19:56, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually very few ... I scrolled through several pages of results and every one referred to our man. Anyway his full name gets more results by itself. It's obviously OK to have the title be a pseudonym when that's much more famous, but in our case he's better known by his own name. BTW an archive search turned up a mix for obits, plenty of papers headlined his real name. GordonGlottal (talk) 03:54, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

text: It does look as though there are good arguments for each.  Britannica using "Mitchell" is good evidence in its favour. Is the biography you mention the 1922 one by Waldo Hilary Dunn mentioned in the article, or a more recent one? Regarding bylines/title pages, it looks as though he used "Marvel" earlier in his career and "Mitchell" later on (e.g. the titles page of  The Battle Summer, 1850; English Lands, Letters and Kings, 1889). If, as the article says, he was best known for Reveries of a Bachelor and other works of that earlier period, then that would suggest using "Marvel". – Arms & Hearts (talk) 17:35, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we say that because of the Times obit and 1911 Britannica? In any case I believe it's true. Nonetheless that was a hundred years ago -- worth nothing that if you search "reveries of a bachelor" on Amazon today, almost all the listings use his real name instead (for me, the first three and 9/12 on the first page). GordonGlottal (talk) 01:48, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Dodgson condensation

message: Why should I believe that this method will work? Understanding that would help me verify that I understand the method correctly and also help to remember it. JRSpriggs 08:39, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Motivation (or better still proof)

message: is it possible to end up with a matrix where the entire middle column ends up as zeros, such that you cannot row switch to resolve the issue? if so, how do you continue this method in that case? do you just have to give up and go with the alternative determinant method?
132.160.49.90 (talk) 02:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Will row switching always work?
Talk:Doon de Mayence

message: This article is taken from the 1911 Encyclopedia Brittanica. Although the exact text may be used because it is in the public domain, the tone and language of the original wording are insufficient now. The text should be revised for the benefit of modern readers.  — CactusWriter | needles 08:31, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Wi2g 19:08, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up

message: I don't know if the information that his father should be Gaufrey de Danemarche are true or not, but it should be the dansih king [Gudfred] then.
Nicolai Ryge  —Preceding undated comment added 09:16, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gaufrey de Danemarche
Talk:Ribera del Júcar

message: --BodegasAmbite 08:41, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Duke of Luynes

message: This section is information for copyright reasons.
This article was created in March 2007 from a cut an past move/demerge see this edit and the initial edit to create this article. For the initial creation of the text in this article see this edit in November 2005. -- PBS (talk) 11:24, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation of this article

message: According to the English article Luynes is Luynes, Indre-et-Loire. According to the article in the French Wikipedia, Luynes refers to a different place: Luynes, Bouches-du-Rhône, a part of Aix-en-Provence. This part needs to be checked and corrected. olivier (talk) 10:16, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Location of Luynes

message: This edit broke the references, because instead of following WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT sources cited by EB1911 were moved up as if they had been read and the  template was removed breaching WP:PLAGARISM guideline. I have now edited the article and restored the attribution. -- PBS (talk) 10:59, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Say were you got it
Talk:Panopticon (Internet culture)

message: Perhaps some discussion of literary visions of our future in that direction might be appropriate? William Gibson's Pattern Recognition and John Twelve Hawks' The Traveler, for some examples. 66.66.133.188 03:09, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  as relates to literature . . . ? 

message: See discussion at Talk:Panopticon#Merge_Panopticon_.28Internet_culture.29_into_here. --ZimZalaBim talk 13:15, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to [[Panopticon]]
Talk:Dumfriesshire

message: Dumfries had three traditional subdivisions - Annandale, Eskdale, Dumfries and Galloway and Nithsdale.
Three subdivisions but Four links???MisterHOP (talk) 08:52, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  I count four? 
Talk:Dunfermline Abbey

message: This article would cover all Fife-related articles such as places, famous people, museums, football and rugby clubs and churches to name a few. Examples would be: Kirkcaldy, Andrew Carnegie, Adam Smith, Dunfermline Abbey, Dunfermline Athletic, The Old Course and Kirkcaldy Museum and Art Gallery. This could also help support articles that really do need a lot of work while keeping general maintenance. Examples would be: Methil, Dunfermline, Cupar and a lot of the smaller towns such as Kennoway and Lower Largo.
=== Support ===
#Kilnburn (talk) 16:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Description

message: #Kilnburn (talk) 16:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Support
Talk:Dymoke

message: What is the preferred/correct pronunciation of "Dymoke"?207.213.195.2 (talk) 23:49, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Queen's Gardens, Kingston upon Hull

message: Here are some articles that can be used to expand and give details of the 2022 upgrade of the site.
*Hull Queen's Gardens dock walls to be unearthed again
*Hull Queens Gardens £12m project approved
*Hull Queens Gardens: Work starts on £12m redevelopment
*Hull Queens Gardens: First tree planted in £12m city park revamp
Keith D (talk) 21:36, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Just suggested updating the article, actually - thanks for that, given the photos I have on Commons of the redevelopment work, I'll see if I, or at least someone else, can get this new redevelopment work added to the article. Significant enough having the gardens closed off for up to three years! Hullian111 (talk) 21:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Upgrade 2022
Talk:Earl of Airlie

message: The body text here, which is almost entirely lifted from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica Ogilvy article, uses a presumably obsolete numbering system, The linked articles use two numbering systems, neither of which match that in the body. For example, David Ogilvy, 11th Earl of Airlie could be the 11th or 6th (as the father of the 12th or 7th) but is the 8th in the body. Although the article admits the numbering varies depending on whether to count attainders, could someone make an effort to introduce consistency between the text and the linked articles? I don't have enough knowledge to try that. David Brooks (talk) 03:02, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency in numbering 

message: "The 5th Lord Ogilvy's grandson, James Ogilvy (c. 1593–1666), was created Earl of Airlie ..."
According to the list below, his life dates were 1586–1665. --INS Pirat (talk) 15:51, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1st Earl 

message: I have been revising the article about John Ogilby (16001676) who claimed to be brother to the first Earl. Editors of this article may be able to improve it further? 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 12:17, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Ogilby
Talk:Earl of Wemyss

message: If the law says that a title is forfeit and cannot be inherited, the heir to that forfeited title cannot possibly be the de jure earl, can he?  Because it is precisely de jure that he is not the heir.  I think the word we're looking for is "self-styled," but then the whole numbering of everything in this article is kind of screwed up. john k (talk) 21:34, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  de jure (I do not think that word means what this article seems to think it means) 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved.   Mdewman6 (talk) 22:37, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Earl of Wemyss and March →  – Peerages of equal rank with individual histories usually have separate articles even if they are currently held by the same person, e.g. Earl of Lindsey and Earl of Abingdon or Duke of Richmond, Duke of Gordon, and Duke of Lennox. The convention in these cases is generally for each page title to refer to a single peerage, with links to the pages about the other peerages. In this case the page title should be 'Earl of Wemyss', including the history of the earldom of March after 1823 and a link to Earl of March for the previous history of the title A.D.Hope (talk) 18:05, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 August 2021
Talk:Liquid metal embrittlement

message: I am interested in testing for Liquid metal assisted cracking and would like to know if anyone else has achieved LMAC simply in a Laboratory environment. My particular interest is with zinc melts and steel, but am interested in all combinations.  Also want to ensure I have the most recent papers about this phenomenon
The Link to Killer instinct leads to a game with that name, not a novel.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.70.28.223 (talk) 13:51, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed the link. Thanks! Kragen Javier Sitaker (talk) 23:19, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

message: I don't think the article addresses this: If I use Field's metal, mercury, or Galinstan and inject it through a small orifice, I guess it may suffer from LME, right ? Then, will melting it, restore it, or will it's LME become cumulative, without any remedy ?
Thanks.DaveDodgy (talk) 05:33, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Will melting fix it?
Talk:Early English Period

message: It seems quite ridiculous to have three articles called Early English (early English what?), Decorated Period (wtf does that mean?) and Perpendicular Period (likewise). And no article on English Gothic. Well, there now is!
These three articles are only accessible from the article Gothic architecture because no-one could possibly find them by any normal means. 
They've been merged, but haven't been deleted yet, awaiting comment. 
--Amandajm 15:02, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[English Gothic architecture]]
Talk:Eboli

message: Linked the sentence about the Badia di San Pietro Alli Marmi to a draft page about the basilica, that will be submitted to review in approximately one to two weeks.
MARL98 (talk) 14:31, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Linking
Talk:Pico-ITX

message: This, now on Computex, looks like even smaller than pico-ATX format: 1GHz C7M x86 32bit CPU, 512MB RAM onboard, the big green chip is northbridge, the small green one is CPU, 3,5 Watts, runs WinXP and smaller than a business introduction card.
Motherboard:
http://www.theinquirer.net/images/articles/Via_Mobile_ITX_Mobo.jpg
In palmbook:
http://www.theinquirer.net/images/articles/Via_NanoBook.jpg
:* I saw some info on this recently, shall have to dig it up. Dayj (talk) 01:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: * It's called the Mobile-ITX. Dayj (talk) 00:58, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smaller form facter 

message: I'm thinking that putting in a subsection for the Epia PX10000G until there is enough information for a page split would be a good idea as there is currently only one model. Dayj 19:40, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: * I added some pictures of the PX10000G, Rev B, the section, references, and a link. Dayj (talk) 01:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temporary subsection for PX10000G? 

message: NVIDIA ION motherboard seems to be smaller/same size... Yet MUCH more powerful than any of the current VIA motherboards, should it be included?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.249.254.253 (talk) 19:09, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NVIDIA releasing Pico-itx board? 

message: This article is pretty low quality. While pico-itx may have been introduced by Via, there's nothing specific about the form factor that ties it to Via; currently it's not possible to even buy a Via product using pico-ITX, but several boards exist that carry Intel CPUs, yet the article constantly mentions Via.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.176.25.249 (talk) 17:27, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Low quality
Talk:Hévíz Spa

message: There should be a redirection page Hevis. --Oop 09:11, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: POV, unreferenced  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cvmuk (talk • contribs) 13:02, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Alpha diversity

message: The 'Recent research' of this article doesn't sound reliable -  I don't think that recent research about alpha diversity is limited only on these four people, and together with missing notes about historical perspective this sounds more like personal advertisement... arne 09:12, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent research

message: How about rolling alpha, beta and gamma diversity into a single article? Richard001 09:13, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Edmund Clarence Stedman

message: Way back in 1885, a young George Bernard Shaw sent off his first book review to the Pall Mall Gazette.  It concerned a forgettable book (Trajan) by a forgotten writer (Henry F. Keenan), but allowed Shaw to deploy what we now call snark.  I had decided to start working though Shaw's reviews to see what articles could be created, and began tracking down other reviews of Trajan.  The publisher advertised the book with a blurb from one "E. C. Steadman", and not being familiar with the name I decided to do some research.
What emerged was an enigma:  here was a poet mentioned in the same breath as Longfellow, Lowell, Holmes and Whittier, but who had never published a book of poetry.  He corresponded with (and annoyed) Whitman, wrote for several leading magazines of the day (but the articles themselves were strangely absent), and was considered to be an anthologist without having ever published an anthology.
Several hours in I finally found a passing reference that mentioned one of his books.  A quick trip to Worldcat ended the search:  Edmund Clarence Stedman was indeed "all that and a bag of chips", and he also was in possession of a name that was misspelled often enough to create an intriguing alter-ego.  Garamond Lethetc 18:55, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The joys of researching outside of one's competence...