lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Isidore Cohen

message: This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of  , , compares against the  six good article criteria:
:GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#:a (tagged and captioned):  b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
#Overall: 
#:a Pass/Fail: 
I felt this article is too short for GA right now - it does not contain enough content, and does not have deep enough coverage of the subject.  This also means it doesn't fit Wikipedia's Manual of style for subheadings and layout.  In addition, only 3 references are used in the entire article - not bad for a start class article, but may not relay all aspects of the subject required for a GA.  In other words, add more info!
Ciar 23:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed "good article" nomination
Talk:Bernard Greenhouse

message: Article has Jan. 3, not verified by any of the refs, and i'm not sure i saw any source for that that didn't look like it was copied from WP. "Bernard Greenhouse" partial chronology at the publisher of a series of paperback bios of cellists says Jan. 1, and (altho it's sloppy enuf to spell the month in German (Januar) in an English chronology, and other weak spelling) it gets some credibility for mentioning Newark, rather than just NJ. Can we come up with something more reassuring? --Jerzy•t 07:35, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exact DoB 

message: About his cello: "Following his death it was to be sold..."
Either it was sold or it wasn't. The fact that it "was to be sold" is irrelevant - unless that's part of an important story about a failed or interrupted sale, which it apparently isn't. TooManyFingers (talk) 22:50, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cello "was to be sold"
Talk:Society of Professional Audio Recording Services

message: I have removed the tag based on the author's "hangon". lets give this some time to grow. Spartaz Humbug! 14:38, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:CSD]]

message: Some of the publications covering recording/audio/music production/studios/business going back to SPARS founding years:
* Recording Engineer/Producer (RE/p) 1970-1992
* db, the Sound Engineering Magazine
* Modern Recording - searchable archive
* Pro Sound News
* Billboard - SPARS search 1970s/80s | Google Books Society of Professional Audio Recording Studios search results
* Mix Magazine
* Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
Doug Grinbergs (talk) 06:28, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Resources
Talk:WEDI (AM)

message: i am writing an article on WEDI, pronounced wee-dee.  known only as WEDI.  acronym stands for workgroup for electronic data interchange.  it is a very important .org in washington which was responsbiel for HIPAA among other things.
I wish i could use a heading or title other than WEDI, but i cant since it is the name of the org.
so i will have to disambiguate this page in a few days.  
any suggestions, please let me know
josephbrophyjoe 02:19, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nike Shox

message: Removed garbage about Pamela Anderson's nude Playboy pictures. Source isn't cited.
--69.246.240.75 02:26, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pamela Anderson? 

message: I’m new; feel free to reverse my edits if they were unhelpful Resaliest (talk) 07:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  You can undo my work
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea/Participants

message: Dokdo should be remain in "Dokdo". 
Dokdo will always belong to the Republic of Korea.
Please consider history of Dokdo.
Dokdo is a part of Korean history.
By the way the participants page appears, it looks like becoming a participant entails pledging to support South Korea's claim to Dokdo. If this is the case, I think it is absolutely ridiculous to having that as a prerequisite to joining the project. If this is not the case, then the page ought to be redone. Isaac Crumm 04:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely. But no, we don't have prerequisite on supporting Dokdo to join this project. (Wikimachine 17:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  (No Title) 

message: In attempting to transcribe some material from an NTSB report into the KAL801 incident, I came across a transcript that wasn't in the text layer for the PDF. (The Transcript is of the Cockpit Voice Recorder.)
 
The first page is here http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page:KAL801Finalreport.pdf/195 
It contains what I'm assuming to be Korean Text, it would be appreciated if someone that is able to read (and type Korean text was able to assist in transcribing the relevant portions of the transcript. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:53, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request from a Wikisource Participant 

message: Hi, any reviewer of  AfC participating in this project? Mvcervi (talk) 01:05, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking for a reviewer
Talk:North Buncombe High School

message: give me more time please it just a stub give me a chanse to hget6 more informationOo7565 02:30, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Information
Talk:Len Smith (rugby)

message: Somewhat glaring that the article says the 1939 Wallabies didn't play a single game but then he's classified as a dual-international. He may have been selected as a Wallaby tourist but he won't be a dual-international unless he played for Australia. It doesn't look like he did. -Sticks66 13:56, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dual-code international ?
Talk:The Country Club

message: Is the purpose of the citations in the "Notable Members" section to corroborate that they were members of The Country Club, or that they're notable (or both)?  The citations that were in there mostly didn't seem to verify that the person was a member of TCC (I think they were intended to indicate that the person was notable? though the Hooper-Madoff and Wadsworth ones seemed largely to incriminate them in financial scandal -- but maybe that's part of why they're notable?) but I put in a citation for Spooner that seemed like evidence that he was a member there.
Also, Anne Nason (who won the Clyde Park Challenge Cup in 1913) is listed as a "notable member," but a 2015 Boston Globe article (https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/06/30/tom-and-gisele-looking-join-the-country-club/ButdqQMWmHLKcQ3QGCQGaL/story.html) said "no women (as full members) until 1989."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Windtheme (talk • contribs) 23:38, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Members
Talk:Imperial Records (1947)

message: The Imperial Records web site indicates that Imperial Records was founded in 1948, not 1947.  But the 1947 founding year is part of the article name.  How do we deal with this complication? Steelbeard1 02:55, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Imperial Records history site from Both Sides Now at  says Imperial was founded in 1946!  Now which source do we believe? Steelbeard1 02:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have an idea.  Because this Imperial Records is active, make this article "Imperial Records" with a note in the beginning about the two earlier companies called Imperial Records.  How's that idea? Steelbeard1 17:02, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: done. Steelbeard1 19:00, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founded in 1948 according to EMI
Talk:Audiograms in mammals

message: *  It seems to me at least that the section in its present state is in a vague sense about all cetaceans, narrowing down to the bottlenosed dolphin on some ocasions, but referencing other dolphins and even non-dolphins throughout...  Anybody care to make this somewhat consistant? -Tiak 02:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bottlenosed Dolphin section isn't about bottlenosed dolphins
Talk:Hydra-Shok

message: I despise marketingese, but wouldn't this page be more appropriate at Hydra Shok or Hydra-Shok? --60.242.150.10 (talk) 02:52, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move?

message: :Seems biased a bit, don't you think? --THEemu 02:58, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see the bias. It's just a stub. --gnomelock 20:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV?

message: Does anyone have any idea about the source for the "200 one-shot stops" statistic? 66.199.58.66 (talk) 06:51, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted the comment about the "one-shot stops". Until a reliable source is brought forward it shouldn't be put in the article. 12.177.80.3 (talk) 21:39, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Better yet, any sources? 98.240.229.140 (talk) 03:49, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources?
Talk:First National of Nebraska

message: I have been making changes to this site.  I hope that it is acceptable.  Please let me know if you like the changes.  Shawn W 03:00, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes

message: Due to charter consolidations and seperate banks now being considered as First National Bank of Omaha, I will be making changes to this page on my sandbox page.  Once I find the template, I will place an under construction notice on the page.  If you have any requested changes, please leave me a message on my talk page.  Thank you.  swinquest (talk) 19:28, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to Page
Talk:List of United States Air Force four-star generals

message: The reason why I replaced your image is because it's already in use on two pages, and for the sake of allowing as many files used as possible, I try to use images that don't have places on the wiki yet, hence the Maryanne Miller replacement. Citing these justifications, is it alright for me to restore the prior image? SuperWIKI (talk) 14:51, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Pleasant Hill High School (Oregon)

message: OSAA (currently) says the principal's last name is spelled "Pinter", while OSE and the school's website both say "Pinger". I'm assuming OSAA got it wrong. tedder (talk) 01:04, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Robert Pinger spelling

message: Reference #4, "Pleasant Hill school packs up for good", has a broken link.  Rocket-Fueled (talk) 08:50, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference #4's link is broken
Talk:Takashi Hashiguchi

message: :He won a newcomer's award in 1987 (published in a magazine), and Combat Teacher debuted the following year in the same magazine.
Which magazine?  Or which award? RJFJR 03:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Need more data

message: Please, what is  chiebukuro?  Is does appear on various websites, including this article.
Thank You,
 hopiakuta  Please do  sign  your  signature  on your  message.  %7e%7e   Thank You. - 05:50, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[ %c2%bf ]][[ %c2%a1 ]]
Talk:Manor railway station

message: The Station Navigation tab at the bottom of the page doesn't display Werribee Racecourse as an existing page, but a current page does exist: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Werribee_Racecourse_railway_station,_Melbourne
I'm not entirely sure how to correct this, so I thought I'd leave this to someone who's more familiar with how it works. Eug.galeotti (talk) 14:32, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem solved; created a redirect on the non-existing page. Eug.galeotti (talk) 17:55, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Werribee Racecourse page exists, but not picked up by Wikipedia (CORRECTED)
Talk:Films of the Golden Age

message: :Image:1-fog2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 03:34, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:1-fog2.jpg

message: :Image:1-fog.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 03:35, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:1-fog.jpg
Talk:Ted Hartley

message: I poked around a bit on the web and found a few references, but they're all pretty weak.  In other words, there's an article in the Los Angeles Business Journal, but they're not known for rigorous fact-checking.  Ditto with IMDB. Much of the bio stuff that I found looks self-written, and especially considering that this is about a Hollywood personality, I'd feel better if we could find some solid sources to verify the claims in this article:  Fighter pilot, investment banker, producer, actor, Olympic athlete, etc. --Elonka 04:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Better references needed

message: The article says he was born in 1935 and was appointed to the Naval Academy at age 16, which means he wouldn't have started until 1951, yet one reference (http://www.tedhartley.com/articles/article%20-%20US%20Naval%20Academy.pdf) has him as a member of the Academy Class of 1946. The IMDB reference has his birthday as November 6, 1924, so since no date appears on his web site and "35" could be a transposition of "24," I'm going to change the date in the article. Stargzer (talk)   — Preceding undated comment added 19:29, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Consistency needed

message: Very puzzling case. In the official records Theodore Ringwalt Hartley appears in various places as both 6 Nov 1924 and 6 Nov 1934. The military records tend to always say 1934, whereas his residency records say 1924. I honestly have no idea which is correct. I tend to think the military may have recorded his DOB wrong and then the error was repeated. Then again, if he was born in 1924, wouldn't he have served in WWII? He signed up for military service on 14 Nov 1949, so surely 1924 (aged 25) is correct and not 1934 (aged 15). Could you sign up at age 15 then? --Jkaharper (talk) 12:50, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct Year of birth?
Talk:061502

message: :Image:061502.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 03:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:061502.jpg
Talk:Debating Design

message: I found :Image:0521829496.01. SS500 SCLZZZZZZZ V1114357448 .jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:0521829496.01. SS500 SCLZZZZZZZ V1114357448 .jpg]]

message: :Image:0521829496.01. SS500 SCLZZZZZZZ V1114357448 .jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 03:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:0521829496.01. SS500 SCLZZZZZZZ V1114357448 .jpg
Talk:Outdoor Life

message: I found :Image:05 1917.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:44, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:05 1917.jpg]]

message: :Image:05 1917.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 03:44, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:05 1917.jpg
Talk:Enterprise information system

message: removed reference to ken baum - no link no evidence - confusing writing. reverted to earlier clearer version.--Boscobiscotti 03:46, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Someone has proposed merging Enterprise systems into this page. I work in IT and don't know any real difference; I actually came to these pages trying to find out. I think it's just semantics, so I support the proposed merge. Would be nice if an SME could clarify the terminology for everyone. bendodge (talk) 15:08, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Proposal

message: I has redirect the term Enterprise system from Enterprise Software to this page, as they are at lest literally saying about different meanings, where a system should be the combination of one or more software that systematically working together. --Gzyeah (talk) 07:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, I think i made a mistake on it! The Enterprise system is "also known as enterprise resource planing (ERP) systems", claimed by the authors from book Managing Information Systems: An Organisational Perspective (Second Edition), page 39 ( / ). According to this definition (while you can find it in many journals about ERP), I have changed the redirection of term Enterprise system to Enterprise resource planning already. --Gzyeah (talk) 03:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Change of Relevant Term