Talk:Lorenzo's oil

message: The ALD pages now states that the substance does show significant benefit. The page needs to be updated. I may do it later. JFW | T@lk 18:46, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early discussion 

message: This article implies that the late Lorenzo Odone received the honorary doctorate from Univ. of Stirling--but the article on Augusto Odone (the father) says that he did in recognition of the research that allowed his son to survive for so much longer. The latter seems more plausible but which assrertiion is correct?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.174.246.169 (talk) 18:11, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification Needed in Article--Who Received Honorary Doctorate?

message: Here are links to the patent for the substance of "Lorenzo's Oil" ('Patent# 5,331,009)
Pharmaceutical compositions for treating adrenoleukodystrophy Google Patents
  Pharmaceutical compositions for treating adrenoleukodystrophy USPTO (Note: These links usually expire after a certain time period)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.67.115.63 (talk) 18:42, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patent 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Lorenzo's oil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080717115741/http://edition.cnn.com:80/2008/US/05/30/lorenzo.odone.ap/ to http://edition.cnn.com/2008/US/05/30/lorenzo.odone.ap/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:48, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lorenzo's oil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081203120159/http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/_srcfiles/Erucic%20acid%20monograph.pdf to http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/_srcfiles/Erucic%20acid%20monograph.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:55, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This subtopic just doesn't seem to display information in an unbiased way as the 'benefits' are sort of hidden in the second and third paragraph, and the final paragraph that's referencing a staunchly negative test just so happens to be the oldest (I mean 1994, come on. Studies have developed so much since then even if completely disregarding the indescribable advances of genetics and knowledge on the brain...), yet is listed at the bottom, where most eyes will scan to and possibly skip the recent studies (which are over a decade newer in some cases). This seems inconsistent with Wikipedia when it comes to scientific publications on the merit of medical treatments.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 
72.250.59.59 (talk) 07:00, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't "Effectiveness" be ordered chronologically, not positive findings awkwardly sorted (hidden) in the middle and negative on the bottom? 

message: It's been many years since I saw the movie, but I thought it explained the theory or mechanism of how the oil works ... would be interesting to see that hereFeldercarb (talk) 01:53, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mechanism?