Talk:Weiß & Schwarz

message: :Image:Böhse Onkelz - Weiß.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:54, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Böhse Onkelz - Weiß.jpg

message: :Image:Böhse Onkelz - Schwarz.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Böhse Onkelz - Schwarz.jpg

message: :Image:Böhse Onkelz - Weiß.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Böhse Onkelz - Weiß.jpg

message: The article offers an unformatted URL, and no corresponding title. The URL is offered only as evidence of the "(8.5/10)" for the pair of albums, but the page there mentions "schwartz" only in inapplicable contexts, and "onkelz" not at all. The same site (IMO unlikely, like the cited page, to qualify as WP:RS does offer an undated review, with the 8.5 rating, of course in German, and Google's machine-translation is not worthless. (My German is "good considering i'm an Ami", but far from efficient, so i offer no promises at this point.)--Jerzy•t 03:55, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source problems