lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Austrian Parliament

message: *support like others in :Category:Parliaments by country Tobias Conradi (Talk) 17:14, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move Request

message: This could use a history section. What about parliament of Austria-Hungary? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  23:43, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Masthead island

message: I have found a photo of masthead, but am waiting for the photographer to get back to me with permission to use it. the photo is located here, , the first photo on the page.  I've noted this here because I couldn't think of anywhere else to note the address where I wouldn't forget about it. rakkar 17:17, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Awaiting Authorisation of photo
Talk:Chris Parnell

message: This page may have to be updated vis-á-vis Parnell's status on SNL.  He's been out of the opening credits for two shows running.  I'm waiting to see if there's an announcement, or if he turns up in November.Bjones 17:19, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Anyone know if Lonely Island wrote his pre Lazy Sunday raps about Ashton Kutcher, Kirsten Dunst, et al?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.125.2.134 (talk) 14:59, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rap Lyrics
Talk:Agranulocytosis

message: Although monocytes may contain fine granules they are not classified as granulocytes. Neither do lymphocytes, although a category of them called large granular lymphocytes (LGLs) may contain granules in their cytoplasm.  84.205.227.5 (talk) 12:55, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Are monocytes granulocytes? Do lymphocytes contain granules?

message: i am doing a debate on wether or not people who suffer from schizophrenia should be forced to take medication.  Any options or sides to this story that i might not have considered?
:Wrong address mate. This is not a discussion site. JFW | T@lk 02:42, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It depends on how you parse the word.  So we have (a)-(granulocyte)-(osis):  (not)-(cell with granules)-(a large number), right?  Except that you could also parse it like this:  (agranulocyte)-osis:  (a kind of cell with no granules)-(a large number).  Either could be correct according to the word formation.  This is why we rely on proper sources instead of making up article simply based on the etymology.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:50, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Here's the correct link to Dorland's at Merck.  It's a much better source than 'yourdictionary.com'  WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:19, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk

message: This article looks into case reports etc on non-chemo drugs causing agranulocytosis. JFW | T@lk 00:21, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review
Talk:Claude Lorrain

message: I've got rid of the 'now-infamous' description of Augustin Tassi. I know it seems a bit tiresome to complain about this. However, in this particular case I feel it is a bit confusing. Was his behaviour infamous then? That is a judgement. Is 'famous in a bad way' meant? And if so, why now? Is he famous at all? All in all, too confusing to stand.
Tomwootton 11:52, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm dubious about this s-p in oils. This is possibly a self-portrait, after Sandrart, & certainly owned and used by Claude. When trimmed it seems best. Johnbod (talk) 18:14, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. If I'm interpreting Google snippet views of French sources correctly, the oil is more likely Charles Mellin aka Charles le Lorrain. Ewulp (talk) 00:02, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: After reflection, I now agree that the possible self-portrait (in a circle, engraved by Sandrart) is best for the infobox. Though arguably less 'flattering' than later Victorian representations of the artist, it's no less flattering than portraits of Gerard de Lairesse (just being facetious). The image is low resolution, but I may be able to obtain a higher resolution version (3600 X 2739 pixels) at RMN. I will enquire as to how to go about doing so. Coldcreation (talk) 06:43, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The BM one is the only possible self-portrait I think. Sandrart presumably drew Claude, and later had this engraved. Claude (or someone else) presumably either copied the drawing around the time it was made (before the LV was started, I think), or maybe much later copied from the published engraving. In any case he clearly owned and approved this actual image, which we don't know about any other one. Johnbod (talk) 15:01, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portrait
Talk:XFM London

message: Instead of making 11 minor edits in a row, please use the Preview function to check your changes as you edit, thanks.
The 'Extension of the XFM Brand' is so biased - it is obviously written by someone who works at XFM.
The extension of the brand was not added by someone at XFM and huge sections of original, relevant and accurate content added by other Wiki contributers have been deleted. As there seems to be no valid reason for doing this, that content should be restored.
10/1/2006 - Could I suggest turning the XFM disambiguation page into a full (but short) article containing information on the national digital network and anything relevant to all three FM stations?
:Yes.  Disambiguation is for when several unrelated things share a name.  That does not apply in this case: XFM is a single brand, concept and company.  Joe D (t) 01:30, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Bearing in mind that Xfm is available in FM across London, Manchester, and much of Scotland, and as DAB across much of the UK; is Xfm just a minor station? Y control 14:38, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Major Station/Network? 

message: Whilst I appreciate the POV implications here, it's now seriously debatable whether the majority of Xfm's output can be described as 'alternative'.  Furthermore, they no longer play any hip-hop.  Comments? Newartriot 14:05, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative 

message: I've heard that XFM recently got rights to broadcast in north wales, can anyone confirm this and add it  to the page Fwed66 18:29, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They recently won a license to cover South Wales, including Cardiff and Swansea--Tdg1986 20:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  XFM Wales 

message: All the information was up to date and correct? It also gave a great indication to the readers what XFM post 10pm stood for, which the page otherwise forgets.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.86.107.218 (talk) 14:25, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was the section on the specialist shows removed? 
Talk:Liquidus (chemistry)

message: I have a few questions regarding the relationships of crytals to the soildus and liquidus.  How do crystals react at or near the liquidus?  How do they react at or near the solidus?  Or how about in between the liquidus and the solidus?  Are they at equilibrium at the liquidus?
:*When temperature increases over liquidus, crystals melt.
:*When temperature decreases below solidus, all system freezes.
:*Between solidus and liquidus, there is equilibrium between crystals and liquid.
:-213.175.91.220 10:46, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

message: *merge. These two articles regard the same topic. Liquidus is a temperature, so appending temperature to the end is extranous. It's like having an article for Joe Schmo and Joe Schmo (person).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdbailey (talk • contribs) 17:29, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge
Talk:Sturmmann

message: I wondered if somebody could cite a source for "Sturmmann" typically referring to "a member of a Neo-Nazi group" these days. I, as a German, have never heard it in that context and find it quite absurd. -84.58.45.1 18:31, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If the literal translation is stormtrooper, would not a paramilitary Neo-Nazi group call thier members Sturmmanner or something like that?  I difer to the German speaker, but that would make sense to me. -Husnock 19:08, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, maybe it would make sense to use SS/SA ranks if there were such a group. But can you name one? I'm pretty sure if this usage was common, I would've heard about it. -84.58.45.156 00:26, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

text: I am German citizen too and haven't heard of it either. 88.73.91.109 20:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I second the objections of my compatriots and want to add that the mentioning of the modern german armed forces doesn't make sense either. At least not in a official manner. --212.144.95.105 (talk) 19:14, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is not used in current german military context. A soldier using this would get disciplinary punishment. --82.113.121.29 (talk) 22:39, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sturmmann" in neo-nazi context 

message: I think someone's been re-writing history.  I've never seen in any book or publication a reference to the SA having a rank called "Obersturmmann".  It also appears this has spread across all the rank boxes, so we need to investigate if this is true or remove it if it isn't. -OberRanks (talk) 17:26, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: As I said in a recent e-mail OberRanks, the lower classes herein need ce work. I don't recall the rank of: SA-Obersturmmann anywhere from my books; there was a NSDAP rank of Obersturmmann, as you know. I will say that German Wikipedia does mention it, written: "SA-Obersturmmann" or "Lieutenant SA man". But even there it is NOT in the printed chart of SA ranks they show and use, nor cited therein. I re-checked my English RS source books and it is NOT there for the SA but only as a NSDAP rank. I therefore am removing it herein. I note there are other errors in the end table as to ranks with links which I have fixed. Kierzek (talk) 18:43, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

text: The rank table for Mann (military rank) needs to be fixed for the same reasons; I just don't have time tonight. Kierzek (talk) 23:19, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think is a fabrication.  I cant find it anywhere else in any publication. -OberRanks (talk) 03:36, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now also fixed the rank table for Mann (military rank) and added cites for same. Kierzek (talk) 23:50, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: There is no "Obersturmmann" rank in the SA
Talk:Stern

message: Registred user, pls. add:
*ca:Popa
*da:Agter
*de:Heck
*el:Πρύμνη
*eo:Pobo (ŝipo)
*es:Popa
*fr:Poupe (bateau)
*he:ירכתיים
*id:Buritan
*io:Pupo
*it:Poppa
*nl:Spiegel (schip)
*pl:Rufa
*pt:Popa
*ro:Pupă
*ru:Корма
*sk:Korma
*sv:Akter
85.240.51.4 (talk) 19:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interwiki 

message: A user drew my attention to claims of repeated vandalism and page blanking by IPs on this article. Having examined the History from recent days I concur that there's a probalem, so I have placed semi-protection on this page so only established users can edit it for the time being. 23skidoo (talk) 02:17, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Page protected

message: thumb|right|150px|Types of sterns
This picture shows a series of types of sterns. Please rework them in a graphics program and reinsert to article. Also look into the exact names for some of the sterns where no name has been given. Thanks
81.244.205.152 (talk) 10:14, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. SiegeLord (talk) 23:19, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Types of stern picture reworking

message: I have just finished (well, sort of finished) adding a lot of new material to this piece as well as a professional diagram of an elliptical stern.  scraping all this info together was mind-bending, and I am still not entirely sure I got it all right!  Having said that, I think the stream of new citations and some text that really parses out the different types of stern makes this piece seven-fold better and more useful than it was even just a week ago.  Or so I hope.  KDS4444Talk 16:17, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Major reworking

message: *Starboard
*Bow
*Stern
Betaben (talk) 00:19, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: See also

message: I am proposing that the article on the Constanzi stern be merged into this article.  As it is, the Constanzi article is a stub-- here it could join all the other types of stern in a unified stern-related article.   KDS4444Talk 10:50, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Rasos Cemetery

message: Does anyone have any source to support the claim that it is one of the oldest cemeteries in the wolrd ? --Lysy (talk) 20:04, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: One of the oldest cemeteries in the world ?

message: Rasos cemetery is a necropolis of not only famous Lithuanians and Poles, but Belarusians as well, so it sounds fair, not only to mention these cultural figures, but also have Belarusian name of the cemetery next to Lithuanian and Polish.
The book Беларускія старонкі Вільні/Vilniaus gudų puslapiai in its chapter Могілкі Росы/Rasų kapinės,
mentions these the most notable Belarussians:
# Францішак Аляхновіч \ Pranciškus Aliachnovičius
#Лявон Вітан-Дубейкаўскі \ Liavonas Vitan-Dubeikauskis
#Галіна Войцік \ Halina Voicik
# Антон Луцкевіч \ Antanas Luckevičius
#Іван Луцкевіч \ Ivanas Luckevičius
#Лявон Луцкевіч \ Liavonas Luckevičius
#Антон Лявіцкі (Ядвігін Ш.) \ Antanas Liavickis (Jadvihin Š.)
#Уладзіслаў Паўлюкоўскі (Улад Ініцкі) \ Vladislovas Pauliukouskis (Vladas Inickis)
#Станіслаў Станкевіч \ Stanislovas Stankevičius
#Альбін Стэповіч \ Albinas Stepovičius
#Канстанцін Стэповіч (Казімір Сваяк) \ Kanstantinas Stepovičius (Kazimieras Svajakas)
#Уладзіслаў Талочка \ Vladislovas Taločka
#Яўстах Тышкевіч \ Jaustachas Tyškevičius
#Людвіка Ямант \ Liudvika Jamant
#Аляксандр Аскерка \ Aliaksandras Askerka
The names of these notable persons should also be added to the list of Notable interments.  
Žemėpatis (talk) 05:14, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Necropolis of famous Belarusians as well 

message: Is a pic available of the grave of Mikalojus Čiurlionis? Sca (talk) 18:23, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Čiurlionis
Portal talk:Agriculture

message: Agronomy does not include Agriculture. Like in french and german Wikipedia, we can redirect agronomy portal to Agropedia portal. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.121.8.14 (talk • contribs) 12:30, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The salvageable content from Portal:Agronomy has now been merged into Portal:Agropedia. Brisvegas 02:03, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: List of agriculture topics was transcluded at the bottom of this portal.  That was hideous, don't transclude entire pages onto this page!  Especially that one! It added nothing to what this page already is about.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 06:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transcluded list 

message: I´ve learned that aerial application is still a ecological and economic method in NZ due to the hilly surface. Is it still in use somewhere else in the world? Please answer at Talk:Aerial_application#Aerial application vs. sprayers, thank you. 84.173.215.143 (talk) 21:15, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aerial application 

message: I have requested a popular pages report to be included at WikiProject Agriculture/Popular pages. Arlen22 18:08, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular pages report 

message: Per the mfd discussion Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Agropedia, has anyone decided on what title this should be moved to? -- œ™ 18:06, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Result was to move to "Portal:Agriculture and Agronomy" -- œ™ 01:31, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retitle? 

message: The current text does not define or describe sustainable agriculture. Rather, it only mentions what SA is not. Ben (talk) 13:02, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sustainable agriculture 

message: Should not the title of this Portal be Agriculture and agronomy (instead of Agronomy) per WP:MoS? Discuss. Cheers!  {Talk} 14:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using Title Case 

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals is back!
The project was rebooted and completely overhauled on April 17th, 2018.
Its goals are to revitalize the entire portal system, make building and maintaining portals easier, and design the portals of the future.
As of April 29th, membership is at 56 editors, and growing.
There are design initiatives for revitalizing the portals system as a whole, and for each component of portals.
Tools are provided for building and maintaining portals, including automated portals that update themselves in various ways.
And, if you are bored and would like something to occupy your mind, we have a wonderful task list.
From your friendly neighborhood Portals WikiProject.      — The Transhumanist    03:20, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status report from the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals|Portals WikiProject]]
Talk:Humber—St. Barbe—Baie Verte

message: I personally feel that we should really go from most recent election to oldest. Any thoughts? --Omnieiunium 22:53, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Order of elections
Talk:Boston College Eagles

message: I propose changing the name of this page to Boston College Eagles. Any comments? --Bleupelouse 06:22, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, this move would be in keeping with the WikiProject College football. Intrepidsfsu 03:22, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  -->Boston College Eagles 

message: Should there be a mention of the fire in the BC-Holy Cross rivalry section? PaulC/T+ 08:37, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Cocoanut Grove fire]]

message: I'm not sure when it was suggested, but the football does really needed to be split to its own article. It is getting too long for this page and they are a rather prominent team so should have their own page. If there are no objections, I'll do this soon (or whoever suggested it can do it) Phydend 15:15, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll be making the split soon. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 20:49, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: To my knowledge, BC has NO "affiliation" with the Catholic church (unlike, say, Notre Dame). In the past 15 years, some right-wing Catholics in the BC Administration have called it a "Catholic" school. I graduated in 1974, and it wasn't a "Catholic" school then. The phrase should be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.74.143.190 (talk) 06:39, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "affiliated with the Catholic Church"
Talk:Ray Cashley

message: The article states that Cashley was "one of only four goalkeepers to [score a goal]".  I find it hard to believe in the entire history of organized football that only four goalkeepers in the entirety of the world have scored a goal; and it's remarkable to me that all four of them seem to have English names.  Can we please identify the proper scope of this claim in the article? Kelly Martin 19:49, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: One of only four
Talk:Sanjeev Kumar

message: Google books & google search give two versions:  Haribhai Jariwala and Harihar Jariwala. Which is correct? Yceren Loq (talk) 23:52, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth name? 

message: Sanjeev Kumar has acted in 150 films all together.He is a highly respected actor. So there is definitely the need for separate filmography page.In the biography only the link to the filmography page needs to be given in the section ACTOR.This would help in putting quality information regarding Sanjeev Kumar in his biography and would reduce the length as well save space in wiki artcile about him. So let there be a seperate page for Fimography of Sanjeev Kumar.Paglakahinka (talk) 14:43, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sanjeev Kumar Filmography 
Talk:Jumblatt family

message: The Jumblatt family was originally of Sunni Kurdish descent and they later became accepted as part of the Druze community and his surname means ‘the iron man’ in Kurdish.
I added to the article the "Kaysi" ethnicity of the Druze of Lebanon to clear up the confusion, becaiuse if someone reads the article. He will assume the Druze are Kurdish, just because Jumblatt came from a Kurdis family. -- Skatewalk 03:40, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A lack of criticism isn't sufficient for a NPOV tag, find some and add as applicable. Some praise was removed. - RoyBoy 22:09, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV removed
Talk:Bottega Veneta

message: Due to Daniel Lee and Co's party controversy and police investigation in Berlin I added this section, the Soho House page has already been revert-attacked once and a warning that arbitration will be called in has been logged on the talk page their (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Soho_House_(club)#Regarding_recent_unwarranted_%22controversy%22_deletions_on_this_page), I would say given these pages current relationship, immediate arbitration might be necessary if the same thing happens here only once. Such arbitrary reverts are immediately suspect Talonx89.12.134.221 (talk) 06:53, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Update teh Daniel Lee (designer) page has also been altered and someone attempted to out me on social media there as a retaliation for adding this information. Fortunately, I do not do social media. In any case I hope, should this happen here as well, that events on the Soho House and Daniel Lee pages will help provide guidance. talonx77.183.83.196 (talk) 07:19, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  A community-driven consensus was reached on Daniel Lee's page (ref Talk:Daniel Lee (designer)), so it just occured to me the same should be applied on this page. Knewdates (talk) 19:39, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: unfortunately someone has once again deleted the information from this page, I have readded it, but I expect this would quickly turn into an edit war. The other page this happened on Daniel Lee (designer) was also edited to eliminate the context of a pandemic-lockdown and actually confirmed gatherings of large number of people.  I will contact Knewdates to ask about locking the page as it seems like Botega likes to undermine wikipedia for profit. Talonx77.13.166.64 (talk) 18:49, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy section added 

message: Maybe I shouldn't scrutinize it just because it's called "advertising", but the "advertising" section of the article looks excessively like... advertising. Shouldn't we just remove the whole thing? Beespoke (talk) 01:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising section
Talk:Adam (disambiguation)

message: Can we merge this page with Adam?
:Definitely, the article should be moved. I can't see a reason why Adam should be a redirect to Adam and Eve. --Nina 08:24, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is no longer advisable, since Adam has been split off from Adam and Eve. -- nae'blis (talk) 22:29, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that this page and Adam (name) have sufficiently been developed and the biblical Adam now resides at Adam (Bible), moving this page back to Adam (momentarily a redirect to this page) makes sense, if for no other reason than conformity with like single name pages (see Eve, Jonathan, Luke, Mark, Martin, Madonna, et al.) - CheshireKatz (talk) 19:00, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

text:  "When the title usually means one thing but also has other meanings, add disambiguation links to the primary topic's article." WP:PRIMARYUSAGE Sasha l (talk) 00:06, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what the primary topic is. Sam Staton (talk) 09:36, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Look up WhatLinksHere The majority of links(probably 8 of 10) mean Adam (Bible), not any other.  Sasha l (talk) 12:24, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There should be a link to the page Adam(murder victim) which exists, but is not reached by this routeDean1954 (talk) 19:24, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adam(murder victim)