lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Why, Pt. 2

message: The song's title begs the question of is there a "Why Pt. 1," or at least the reasoning behind the inclusion of a "Pt. 2" in the title. Darwin's Bulldog 21:35, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Song's title

message: also, someone explain the video..!   Is this a recreation of highs school?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.70.42.19 (talk) 00:57, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: video explanation=
Talk:Vernonia noveboracensis

message: Do ironweed plants spread by rhizome or stolon?  Used "runner" but directed to rhizome because the rhizome discussion mentions confusion with stolons.  Is it important practically (ie for a farmer looking for info to determine if and how ironweed in his pasture needs to be controlled)?  Don't know.  Info about this might be useful.  MattRAnalyst (Sept 23 2011).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MattRAnalyst (talk • contribs) 20:30, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A google scholar search for "vernonia control" or "vernonia weed" shows a few articles from Weed Science (and similar journals) but the first hits I saw were for Vernonia altissima or other species not V. noveboracensis. Unless I'm missing something based on reading Stolon and Rhizome, we'd be better off not focusing on which word fits better, but more specific distinctions like what distance the plant will spread underground (if that is the relevant aspect). Kingdon (talk) 22:09, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Are Ironweed runners rhizomes or stolons?
Talk:List of Beowulf characters

message: In the Beowulf article, it says that the dragon is sometimes called Sua. What's the source?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.78.50.75 (talk) 22:15, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sua

message: Most commentaries admit that Beowulf (lines 18 and 53) is probably a scribal error for Beo or Beow or Beaw or perhaps Beorn. The same scribe made three attempts at the Biblical Cain and got them all wrong. You shouldcomment on this. Ah, this page already advocates Beaw instead: - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scylding Vince Calegon 11:44, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Son of Scyld Scefing
Talk:Biloxi Lighthouse

message: User:Akyoung88 put in big chunks of text in April, which have the tone of tourist boosterism rather than an encyclopedia article. (Stuff like "The Biloxi Lighthouse is an inspiration to an entire region [...]  This is a lighthouse whose future is bright in or out of Biloxi as long as history repeats itself and cameras flash.") I think either the "Tourism" and "Photography" sections need to be rewritten, or simply flushed (is it a text dump from somewhere else?) -- Infrogmation (talk) 23:57, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: POV promotional tone
Talk:Retinal isomerase

message: When I clicked the link to https://iubmb.qmul.ac.uk/enzyme/EC5/2/1/3.html, I got:
"Deleted entry: retinal isomerase. Now known to be catalysed by a pathway involving EC 1.1.1.300, NADP-retinol dehydrogenase; EC 2.3.1.135, phosphatidylcholine—retinol O-acyltransferase; EC 3.1.1.64, retinoid isomerohydrolase; and EC 1.1.1.315, 11-cis-retinol dehydrogenase.
[EC 5.2.1.3 created 1961, modified 1976, deleted 2011]"
-- Martin Gühmann (talk) 04:46, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does not seem to exist
Talk:Farish A. Noor

message: This person appears to be a notable professor per WP:PROF. Bearian 21:18, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Neither of these references link to a valid site. Perhaps the original editor can find where they may have migrated to? MargaretRDonald (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  References??
Talk:Étaples mutiny

message: The article on the Etaples mutiny was very misleading.
Most quotes were accurate , except that they refer to different events, woven together.
The only character missing is d'Artagnan!
I have removed references to the geocities site, which does not exist anymore.
Added some clarifications, denials of various rumours, memorial to J F Davies
I am done, I think?
Holuigue (talk) 06:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As the article states, the enquiry files were destroyed. So full info won't be known. But it can be better. Rich Farmbrough, 02:44, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is indeed very scrappy and on occasion so badly written as to be unintelligible, so I've tried to improve it, although this has resulted in some deletions.Ausseagull (talk) 15:41, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Over the last year or so, there has been a massive deletion of well-written, well-structured and referenced material, which has been replaced by a rambling, unencyclopedic mess. I will set about reinstating the deleted content. Grant | Talk 05:48, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What has gone on here?! 

message: I took out the JF Davies section, it didn't make any sense to me. If he's notable for some reason, please re-add it and explain why it's important. Otherwise it's just a random history of a random person. --AW (talk) 22:20, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  J.F. Davies section 

message: The last paragraph of 'background' appears unrelated. It happened at a different time and a different place. Is there anything to link the incidents?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.37.151.195 (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unrelated event
Talk:The Long, Hot Summer (TV series)

message: (Copied Dec 15, 2017 from where I posted this on the talk page of User:Pinkadelica who renamed this article with a comma.)
Due to new information, I ask you to consider reversing your 2009 Wikipedia article title rename of the 1965-66 TV series The Long, Hot Summer from its original article name (no comma) of The Long Hot Summer. Since your 2009 edit, someone uploaded the episodes to Youtube and the title card on them definitely shows The Long Hot Summer without a comma. Photos of the same title card are also now available in a Google image search. As further evidence, the TV Guide cover of April 9, 1966 here with series star Roy Thinnes also has it spelled without a comma as The Long Hot Summer. The same authoratative TVGuide.com website refers to it with no comma here and here. The mostly user-generated IMDb site is not an entirely reliable source on Wikipedia, per WP:CITINGIMDB. The TV series people must have decided to go with the grammatically correct no comma version. When you made the 2009 edit, perhaps you did not have these facts, so please consider revisiting your edit and change back the article title. Add a mention in the intro that it is based on the film, which does have the comma. Currently, the one-sentence intro does not mention that. Thank you. 5Q5 (talk) 17:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: The Long Hot Summer TV series rename (no comma)
Talk:UDP-glucose 4-epimerase

message: At the end, it shows that UDP-galactose turns into UDP-glucose through 4-epimerase, but the structures are exactly the same. Is this a mistake?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.218.229.41 (talk) 21:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Flow chart

message: Well, no. Since you were drawing an equilibrium symbol, this enzyme has two substrates. --Ayacop (talk) 15:24, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hence, this enzyme has one substrate 

message: WRONG!Ayacop. This is definitely a mistake, in (4) the representation of UDP-gal is in fact Gal-1-phos. this should be fixed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.6.115.237 (talk) 07:03, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Flow chart
Talk:Steve Osborn

message: I recreated this page after searching around the web for information on Dick Lugar's 2006 opponent, seeing a red link to Steve Osborn from the Indiana 2006 US Senate election page.  My search led me back to a "web copy" from some other site (answers.com) of a previously existent article.
For the record, I saw the page on the senate race and wondered why Osborn won Warren County.  I wanted to find out if that's where Osborn lived, although it turns out that he's from La Porte, over in La Porte County (a good distance from Warren County).  I still haven't found the answer I was looking for, but hopefully, someone knows more about Steve Osborn, his campaign, and the 2006 Indiana US Senate race, and that someone will contribute more information to this article in the future.
I think that having a page here is more useful than not having anything at all.  Having a page encourages people to come to it, read through it, and correct and expand it.  It's easier to get people to make small changes to a page and add bits of information than it is to get people to create a page; thus, having an existent page encourages contributions and article development.
By the way, does anyone know if his campaign site was archived somewhere?
As a sidenote, I used the politics stub tag instead of the politician stub tag since, assuming that he has never held public office before based on the information in the article, he isn't actually a politician.  Should I change this to the politician stub tag?
~GMH talk to me 21:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-Creation
Talk:Toyota Vista

message: "Studies for new FWD platform and packaging (layout) began in 1993 and appeared on market in February 1997 in the Toyota Prius, but the Vista is the first mass-production, FWD Toyota with a new platform." Can someone clarify?? Where's the source? North wiki (talk) 17:21, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fourth generation: V40 (1994–1998)
Talk:Xylose isomerase

message: :::Quote from authoritative review "D-Glucose isomerase (EC 5.3.1.5, also referred to as D-xylose isomerase..." citation: DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b06293 J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 13343−13345.--Smokefoot (talk) 13:55, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: D-Glucose isomerase = D-xylose isomerase
Talk:Maungatautari

message: nice article on an important restoration project. requires more in-text citations for verification
Goldfinger820 21:42, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: yep i realise there will be limited references - but would be nice to have the citation(s) in text rather than just at the end Goldfinger820 03:13, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe when there is a second source citations could be inserted, but at the moment it would just be disruptive to have about a hundred identical citations. Just my opinion, as the original author GrahamBould 07:36, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: 1. ^ a b c Trust website home page
2. ^ a b Another Trust webpage
3. ^ a b c d Yet another Trust webpage
4. ^ Not Trust website
Nurg (talk) 22:18, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Footnotes

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Efforts have been made to retain creative content that is not likely to represent a problem, much of this has been merged with new material. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter, here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:32, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Chukchi Cap

message: I am reverting this edit in order to reaffirm notability.
The wikipedia has volunteers who delete any small article that is not on a topic they are interested in, that doesn't contain an explicit assertion of notability.
The wikipedia's policies do not allow articles to be speedy deleted for a lack of notability if the article contains an explicit assertion of notability.
Please don't remove assertions of notability without explanation.
Cheers!  Geo Swan 21:44, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: restoring assertion of notability
Talk:Baconator

message: ...then the nutrtional percentages would have been for the bad stuff too, like cholesterol, not only for the vitamins.  just sayin'...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.27.185.231 (talk) 20:09, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't actually know who wrote this article, so you are making baseless personal attacks on other editors. If you have sourced information on those other figures, present it. Maybe that is why it isn't here, because people like you just attack without contributing? --OuroborosCobra (talk) 21:21, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well said Ouro. Tyciol (talk) 19:11, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I can guarantee I am not Wendy's PR department, since I wrote most of it... --Jeremy (blah blah) 00:18, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No mention of the Spicy Baconator on this page? 66.176.117.29 (talk) 15:23, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: If this page hadn't been written by wendy's PR...

message: "It is one of their late-teen–to–young-adult, male-oriented products." where does it being male-oriented come from? i didn't see that anywhere in the cited link. --dan (talk) 01:58, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  male-oriented? 

message: I'm sorry but that picture is not a baconator. I've had several and they only resemble that slightly. I'm not sure if that's old and they've started making them differently or the ones in my area are different, but that is not a baconator. http://kansascityonthecheap.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Son-of-Baconator.jpg this imo is more accurate, but I doubt we can use that. Next time someone orders one, could they snap an accurate pic and upload it? Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CE6D:6FB0:DC40:19A9:51CA:F388 (talk) 17:11, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: The article doesn't actually explain what a baconator is. All it says is that it is a hambuger. The description of the advert implies there is beef and bacon in it due to the lyrics, and the name suggests bacon is the main ingredient. The picture shows cheese too which isn't mentioned any way. Should there be a sentence explaining what primary ingredients are in a baconator?
Noggin182 (talk) 13:57, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ingredients
Talk:Altezza lights

message: A google search for "Lex-arse Lights" gets 6,120 hits which indicates to me I'm not the only one who uses it, however it may be more UK then US (even though I'm a Kiwi) If no one objects I will re-add this name in a couple of days
Cheers
Falcon5nz (talk) 11:15, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can source it, then add it. And yes, this would definitely be a Britain/British Commonwealth term. --2600:100F:B01C:6799:0:E:BAF3:D001 (talk) 15:04, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Lex-Arse

message: Isn't this fad dead? 107.60.21.89 (talk) 23:05, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems like they're more common on cars from the early 2000s and earlier. I.e. the Mitsubishi Eclipse of the late 1990s, etc. --2600:100F:B01C:6799:0:E:BAF3:D001 (talk) 15:02, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead? 

message: So I was wondering, are we going to pretend these don't have a massive following in the Hispanic American community? --2600:100F:B01C:6799:0:E:BAF3:D001 (talk) 15:02, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Popularity in Hispanic community
Talk:St Kilda field mouse

message: This photo looks like an ordinary field mouse, not the St. Kilda subspecies. PatGallacher (talk) 18:47, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was replaced by File:St Kilda field mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus hirtensis).png , uploaded in 2011.--Mais oui! (talk) 07:55, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph 

message: This article contains numerous grammatical and punctuation errors.  In some cases, the message is clear, while in other sentences the meaning is muddled by such errors.  Someone with a better knowledge of this topic should consider revising.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.192.104 (talk) 17:22, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The references used in this article are easy to access and very easy to understand. I suggest next time you find this sort of situation, instead of posting a criticism, you have a go at fixing the article yourself. This is, after all, the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. However, I went ahead and gave the prose a bit of a clean up just now. Invertzoo (talk) 20:35, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There, fixed it for you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.2.120.11 (talk) 13:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: A note
Talk:Ashton Shepherd

message: This page was tagged with  less than a minute after I created it. Before anyone else considers Ashton non-notable, keep in mind that she meets at least one criterion of WP:MUSIC; specifically, #2 in the criteria for musicians and ensembles ("Has had a charted hit on any national music chart"). Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 21:54, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: how do I cite on this page, cause her single "look it up" is now 18, so I put it there, but didn't know how to cite it in wikipedia. so I left the article in the references!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.64.222 (talk) 23:25, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Citing

message: Garren Isaac Smith, owner of Garren Smith Music and Entertainment, has been the manager, booking agent and sole representative of Ashton Shepherd since July 2022. This can be verified by Ashton Shepherd's verified Facebook page. 139.55.2.45 (talk) 02:40, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ashton Shepherd's management, etc.
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject European history/Strategy

message: Just to throw this into the mix, there are historical regions like Transylvania (this particular one has several separate articles devoted to it's history and a portal.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 21:57, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

message: I tend to think some of the questions about the definition of history and historical articles should wait while we organize the project a little more.  Some of that deserves to be discussed at the SuperParent Wikipedia:WikiProject History too.  Definitely needs to be discussed though, don't get me wrong.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 02:24, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deep questions 

message: The discussion seems to have gone to sleep, can we wake it back up?  --Doug.(talk • contribs) 03:56, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are we still doing this reorganization? 

message: I'm leaving the heading on the main sub page as it is important to the the "outline" of our scope but thought best to actually discuss here.  I'm not sure, depends on whether there's enough interest in maintaining it in the first place and also, could it better be done by a section on Portal:Europe and a section on Portal:History, if not, it at least needs a link there, maybe still a section with a "for more information" link.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 03:46, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just as a suggestion, I would recommend discussing these things at the top-level talk page Wikipedia talk:WikiProject European history. I'm not sure people think to check here. No reason not to keep it centralized. - Revolving Bugbear 17:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I had initially intended to discuss what we were doing on the strategy page, more the form than the function, here.  But I guess I should've gotten the hint when you didn't respond here either and you were working on the strategy page too.  Good call, I'll rework merge and redirect the discussions - shortly I hope.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 03:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portal:European History? 

message: Hi. I am very interested in the ideas on this page for WikiProject European History. I would like to discuss these if possible. is there a way to do so? Appreciate any input. thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 18:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question re topics of  this page
Talk:Little Portion Hermitage

message: I am the author of the www.LittlePortion.Org website, and have full authority to post any information contained therein - Jim Cosgrove, Operations Manager, Little Portion Hermitage Monastery & John Michael Talbot Ministries Cosgrovej 22:07, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As the website concerned is now released under the GFDL, I have removed the copyvio speedy deletion tag. It does need some more verifiable and Reliable sources. Thanks. Woodym555 22:45, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Have significantly reduced the text, presenting only the basics. This is more in line with the entries of similar monasteries. Cosgrovej 04:43, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: Please see GNU release posted at http://www.littleportion.org/Legal Cosgrovej 22:30, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As the website concerned is now released under the GFDL, I have removed the copyvio speedy deletion tag. It does need some more verifiable and Reliable sources. Thanks. Woodym555 22:45, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Have significantly reduced the text, presenting only the basics. This is more in line with the entries of similar monasteries. Cosgrovej 04:43, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GNU License posted 
Talk:Network for Good

message: I added the  tag to this article before and it was subsequently removed by the user who was editing it at the time I inserted it. However the article still sounds like an ad. Please do not remove the tag without either fixing the article or discussing it on here first.. thanks. --ImmortalGoddezz 22:11, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ad

message: I found the first paragraph of the Fees and Policies section very unclear.  For example, "Network for Good charges a "minimum donation" to Network for Good ..."  What does that mean? 75.15.126.203 (talk) 16:03, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I've removed the whole section, as it's not independently sourced. TNXMan 16:06, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear "Fees and Policies" section 
Talk:The Full Cupboard of Life

message: This article is coming along, now having some Reviews included. The review articles were interesting, so pleased with the novel and the series, and figuring out the humour of McCall Smith. The Plot summary never says how the case is reolved, checking out the suitors of the wealthy woman, and that ought to be included. The article does not have a Characters section, which needs the book at hand to write. --Prairieplant (talk) 00:21, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still ned a Character list