Talk:Liberal

message: Wow, oh-so-biased article. Consider for deletion? Mac OS X 15:34, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

message: I agree wholeheartedly with the first commenter.  This article is extremely negative, biased, and skewed.  It is also far too short to cover the topic adequately.  It uses very loaded and one-sided language.  Examples:
- "Denial of inherent gender differences" might instead say equality of opportunity regardless of sex/gender.
- "Taxpayer-funded abortion?" How about taxpayer-funded welfare checks to mothers not prepared to raise children?
- "Opposition to a strong American foreign policy" - perhaps you mean opposition to an Imperialist foreign policy?
The list can go on and on...and this one seems obviously put together by a liberal-hating American conservative (bias and the origins of articles on Wikipedia should not be this obvious).
149.136.25.254 20:40, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: no 2601:646:C300:7080:6925:2BE6:AE26:668E (talk) 04:50, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How did you not notice this one? 

message: Please do not blank or redirect the page until the close of the AfD, the notice clearly says "but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed" Conservativechuck 00:09, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The information is not stolen, it is released under a GFDL compatible license. If you believe something is biased feel free to change it with proper sources. You have chosen to take this article to AfD, now please abide by the AfD guidelines which states that the article is not to be blanked or the notice removed until the end of the discussion. Conservativechuck 02:09, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The entire page is biased, so i changed it. I simply reverted to the last edit before it was vandalized, which was as a redirect page. Give up. You always have Conservapedia. Mac OS X 02:18, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please assume good faith against other editors. You chose to nominate an article for deletion, the AfD notice clearly states you are not to blank the page or remove the notice until the end of discussion. Creating a redirect does both of those Conservativechuck 02:34, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

text: The blank and redirect is fine, if not mandated by policy.  The article version is utter poppycock, speediable on quite a few grounds, not the least of which is copyvio of the dictionary.com definition.  We don't copy or play tit-for-tat games with conservapedia.  Good faith or bad faith has nothing to do with that, it's just completely unconstructive editing to make a point rather than to further our encyclopedic mission.  Wikidemo 14:39, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Blanking and Redirecting

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Liberally. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 16#Liberally until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:13, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Liberally" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Bleeding heart liberalism. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 16#Bleeding heart liberalism until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bleeding heart liberalism" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Bleeding-heart liberal. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 16#Bleeding-heart liberal until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bleeding-heart liberal" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Bleeding heart liberal. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 16#Bleeding heart liberal until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bleeding heart liberal" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]