lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bushveld Igneous Complex

message: I would love to see a summary section here but I don't understand the topic well enough to write one. Tealpanda 20:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary section

message: One can not simply substitute Gauteng for Transvaal. Even though the Bushveld Igneous Complex is located in central Transvaal it does not mean it is located in central Gauteng or even Gauteng only. The complex extends from Gauteng into Limpopo, North West and Mpumalanga provinces. I have reverted the edit that substituted Gauteng for Transvaal. If the intent was simply to replace the old province name, then that sentence will require a rewrite in order to stay factually accurate --NJR_ZA (talk) 13:27, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Transvaal/Gauteng

message: The main source of this article is dated. It relies primarily on a publication from 1904. Since then, there has been probably more than a hundred new peer-reviewed scientific articles. The information is available. Also, the dead links could be fixed or provided with relevant alternatives. -- Joedf (talk) 05:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Up to date information 

message: The mining and economy section were meant to be subsections of Industry. same for geology, subsections are Origin and formation, Structures, Units - Joedf (talk) 00:40, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Industry section 

message: — Assignment last updated by Naeim9146 (talk) 21:48, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ERTH 4303 Resources of the Earth
Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of drug-free Wikipedians

message: I count 17 delete, 4 delete on superficial counting, taking everyone at face value, inlcuding the "keep" from this page's creator.   This is about 81% delete.  Since this is really the closing admin's call, I'd like some explanation of the reasoning.  Friday (talk) 03:54, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Aria (band)

message: I have removed copyrighted material from the article pending permission for its use. I sent the author an email on December 12, 2005. See Tartarean Desire for the original article. ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 04:06, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I received permission from Tartarean Desire to post the material with proper credits, however I learned that their biography of Aria is simply a (probably Babelfish) translation of the band's official biography in Russian. I'm not sure how copyrights relate to translations... ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 23:11, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: IANAL, but translations are derivative works, so you can't post this here unless you can get the band to release the original under the GFDL.  If the translation includes refactoring and editing it would get more complicated (see idea-expression divide) but a straight babel-fish would definitely result in no change in copyright ownership.  Superm401 - Talk 06:50, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyrighted material

message: YouTube link is not a spam. It is often used around Wikipedia. Look here, here, there, here or there, for example. Garret Beaumain 03:45, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a weak status quo argument.  I don't see why the video is particularly interesting, or worth including. Superm401 - Talk 01:50, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

text: The link that i removed had nothing to do with Aria.Shrike 21:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video link 

message: Good article: one thing I would definitely get to work on though is finding citations for some sections, like under "Rise to Fame" for example.  Also, in the very first paragraph, it would probably be best to have a citation regarding the writers/creators of the lyrics (that seems to be an important fact), since there doesn't seem to be any footnotes at all.  Other than that, очень хорошо.MegaloNickoloff (talk) 02:31, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finding Citations 
Category talk:MOS Technology integrated circuits

message: This category is problematic in two ways: it does not follow the Wikipedia:Naming conventions, and the natural complement of articles is not exclusively MOS products. Since the CPUs reside comfortably in :Category:65xx microprocessors already, I suggest placing the support chips in a new :Category:65xx support chips, which should be a subcat under Microprocessors. --Wernher 04:10, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-standard category title
Talk:Yosemite Mountain Sugar Pine Railroad

message: A bot has just deleted approximately 75 percent of this article.  It seems unlikely that this result was not a mistake of some sort, hence I intend to restore most of this article's content, via reversion.  Perhaps I am mistaken, and there is some reason 3/4ths of this article should have been deleted, but as I do not know why that would be, I am hence strongly inclined to take this action. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 10:49, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently, someone else has just beaten me to it. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 10:51, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massive Deletion by Bot 

message: I came here to determine if it was worth a long drive to experience this railway. I don't see any mention of it's length. Is it 12 miles long or does it circle the parking lot? Thanks BrianAlex (talk) 03:48, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  How long is this "railway"? 

message: In thinking about the Stauffer family’s departure from Hungary in 1944 due to the advancing Russians, It sounds as if they may have been on the side of the Germans. Otherwise, why run from the Russians? 2603:300A:59D:6800:F1CF:A6A3:7E51:A40D (talk) 16:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rudy Stauffer in Hungary
Talk:Catharsis (band)

message: I reverted a copyvio. The copied text can be found at IronD Records. ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 04:22, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio Information
Talk:Kate Ritchie

message: Several editors have repeatedly added her alleged date of birth to this article without supporting sources - in violation of WP:BLP and WP:DOB.  It has been removed several times as well.  Please do not add it back without a WP:RS supporting it.  Toddst1 (talk) 16:44, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: DOB requires a solid source
Talk:Corey Harris

message: Just put this in here so people could run across it and hopefully they'll know more than me.  I couldn't even find the date of his birth, just the year.  Any help is appreciated.  --akijikan 04:27, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually we probably shouldn't include his birthdate anyway.  (see WP:BLP) -MrFizyx 06:27, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thought, if the All Music Guide has it, why can't we. -MrFizyx 06:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just threw this together
Talk:Virus (1999 film)

message: The program considers humanity a virus and attempts to destroy it because in its mind, virus = bad, but it doesn't realize that itself is a virus.
: Not exactly, in the film there is scene where the energy creature (not program) declares all humans to be virus. Nothing more or less. 89.1.174.66 (talk) 02:23, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "The lifeform invades Mir (the Russian space station) and is transmitted to a Russian research ship, and sets out to exterminate the crew of a tugboat who find the derelict ship."
- I'm not sure but I don't think that exterminating the crew of the tugboat was it's ONLY goal. I think the virus wanted to kill/assimilate every living thing possible.
"To do this, the alien creates cyborgs by fusing the corpses of its victims with various electronic parts. These creations are manufactured in a mini-factory it built in the ship."
- It didn't make the cyborgs JUST to kill the crew of the tugboat, as I said above. Also, the factory was already part of the ship when it took it over, not something it built inside the ship.
Dr. Mordecai 09:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Description errors 

message: Deleting some of the trivia as it is opinion and original research, others should get sources or they too will be deleted. First, theres no proof that its Canadian, its just your opinion because you see a Red Jack and no Brit accents, thats not enough for wiki, and that really only suggests that the Captain is (that and the Webley Revolver), at least one was Mexican, that suggests a multicultural North American crew, not Canadian. Second similarities between cyborgs in this and other fiction works is insignificant and not noteworthy, unless PERHAPs they are called the Borg and maybe the same special effects or costume guy worked on them both. Even borg isn't that relevant, hardly an original name, its just shorter for cyborg.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 07:02, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: Sorry about the large number of edits to this page.  I was watching this and just thought I'd clean up the article along the way =).  Kata Alreshim (talk) 06:48, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits
Talk:Herbert Hyland

message: This edit removed info about Hyland from Hyland Highway which does not appear to have been incorporated in this article. As I'm notionally on a wikibreak at the moment, I can't devote the time to validate and integrate it now. Perhaps someone else can.
The text was
:The highway was named after the deceased Sir Herbert Hyland, a well known man throughout Gippsland. He was a politician, holding a seat for the Country Party (now the National Party of Australia) for 41 years (1929-70). He was leader of the Country party from 1955-1964, and held a number of ministerial positions between 1936-1952, including that of Minister of Transport. In this role, he drove the famous H220 steam engine, Heavy Harry, on its "Maiden Voyage". H220 is currently in a museum in Williamstown, Victoria. 
:Sir Herbert was known as a true "Honest Politician", and had a true passion for his job. After proving himself to be a worthy member of society, Mr. Hyland was knighted by the Queen.
--Scott Davis Talk 04:44, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Other info
Talk:Filippo Lippi

message: I found this article incedibly messy. It should be placed on Wikipedia Cleanup status.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.170.222.164 (talk • contribs) May 7, 2007 
I have tried to tidy this up, but a few lines are beyond my comprehension.  This needs the help of someone knowledgable.  Also needs someone who's read Vasari and can double-check.
Pishogue 01:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sources variously give 8 October, 9 October or 10 October.  Anyone know where these different dates came from, and which one is more likely to be the correct one?  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 21:18, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Death date

message: Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
Many of the paragraphs are only cited once or twice when multiple separate facts are reference.
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
The dates and the timeline of the article completely jump around, making it very hard to understand. In a single paragraph multiple important themes and time periods are mentioned
Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
The article remains neutral, however the information only comes from very minimal sources, which decreases any variety in position or opinion.
Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
Vasari is a main source who is renowned, but only the opinion of one man. One source appears to be a biography from newadvent.org, which focusses mainly on Lippi's religious ties. The other sources are short summary biographies from Museum websites that carry his work, which lack detail. 
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
There is not any real inclusion of discussion of his works, other than the overall dates and description. Also no discussion of his legacy. 
Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
Some of the links work, and there is close paraphrasing in the article, even some plagiarism. 
Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
The overall timeline is not accurate, with dates jumping from childhood to adulthood. The design of the article could be better, separating his background and then specifically looking into each period of his work as an artist. 
Mcalmar15 (talk) 02:55, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Critical review of the article

message: In a couple of places Fra is written Fra'. The apostrophe is not necessary, it is not used in Italian (see the corresponding entry in the Italian Wikipedia and the Treccani entry for "Fra". The article says he is also known as "Lippo Lippi", but I think only in Browning's poem. Perhaps I'm wrong in this, but I've never seen him called Lippo Lippi by art historians, either in English or Italian. Maybe we could simply write "also called Lippo Lippi in Browning's poem".METRANGOLO1 (talk) 09:12, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fra' or Fra? And Lippo Lippi
Talk:Apple Attachment Unit Interface

message: Older text before "rewrite": (for anyone willing to expand the article using the original text AND reliable sources) Pavlor (talk) 05:53, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted most of this. See Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Apple_Attachment_Unit_Interface. ~Kvng (talk) 17:39, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  TNT rewrite
Talk:Apple Display Connector

message: This article requires a little bit more explaining. Thizz 20:02, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The original NeXT Computer had a single cable connecting the monitor to the machine, just like ADC. Coincidence? --TMC1221 (talk) 04:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NeXT precursor? 

message: The article says: "The Apple Display Connector, debuted in the Apple Studio Display, is physically incompatible with a standard DVI connector, as was previously used in the PowerBook G4 and the older Power Mac G4."
* The "Apple Studio Display" article says that ADC replaced DVI on Apple displays in July 2000.
* The PowerBook G4 article says it was introduced in January 2001, which would put it after the ADC transition.
* Looking on everymac.com, all the pre-ADC Power Mac G4 models (1999) were VGA only.  In 2000, the Power Mac G4 switched from VGA straight to VGA+ADC.
Which Mac model, exactly, prior to the introduction of ADC, used a DVI connector?  I can't find any.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.212.114.244 (talk) 22:28, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it. The first Apple laptop with a DVI port was the second-generation titanium PowerBook G4, which was launched in 2002, a couple of years after ADC. My hunch is that a monitor interface that relied on power from the host computer was a bad idea in a battery-powered laptop. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 16:01, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

text: Having said that the original 1999 Apple Cinema Display had a DVI connector, and the first generation of Power Macintosh G4s did have a DVI port - it's buried away in Everymac's specification sheet, but models with a Rage 128 video card had VGA and DVI. That appears to be the only instance where Apple switched from DVI to ADC. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 16:14, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standard DVI connector, previously? 

message: https://lifehacker.com/make-an-old-apple-studio-display-monitor-work-with-stan-5683846  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2149:889C:2C00:BD7C:2963:EC0B:2630 (talk) 10:31, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ADC connector hacks
Talk:List of most expensive films adjusted for inflation

message: See for example the cost of Titanic. Also, notice the discrepancies between this list and  the other one: the Matrix reloaded is listed as having cost $127,000,000 vs $162,800,000 in this article. I think the problem is that a) sometimes sources include marketing, sometimes not, and b) the production costs are estimates (compare , , and ).--Wasabe3543 04:58, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marketing costs included?
Talk:Hamida Djandoubi

message: Added one reference, needs more to cover the article content. Tag added--FloNight 05:01, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs references

message: This article refers to Christian Ranucci as a "child murderer", despite the fact that his guilt is highly contested. At least two books that I know of (Le Pull-over rouge & Christian Ranucci: Vingt ans après) present the case for his innocence in documented detail. Wouldn't it be more accurate & neutral to describe him & the other executee as having been convicted of the murder of a child? Cmissy (talk) 07:59, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: From a journalistic standpoint, once a person has been convicted of a murder, it is correct to refer to them as a murderer.   The conviction itself is what defines a person as a murderer.  This would stand until the conviction has been legally disproved or the person has been pardoned.  In other words, if you are convicted, it does not actually matter if you did it, you are a murderer.   Murder isn't a semantic or logic term, it is a legal one.   Prior to conviction one would say "alleged murderer."  Encyclopedic articles don't normally become involved in controversies unless the article is about a specific controversy or the topic of controversies in general.   The mention of this person in this particular article is of minor consequence and relatively trivial.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.191.249.22 (talk) 00:18, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality
Talk:Salmon River (Idaho)

message: I'm pretty sure that the Yellowstone River is the longest undammed river in the lower 48 (and its article says so as well).  It seems like 1/2 the Google results show the Salmon, and half show the Yellowstone.  Nationalparks 05:02, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Now the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area claims the Delaware River as the longest undammed.  Nationalparks 19:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Longest Undammed River?
Talk:Apple Interactive Television Box

message: The link to the original assembler postings for reference number three is down due to Assembler games being shut down. The link can be traced back using the internet archive Here 62.30.119.197 (talk) 22:17, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Well done. I added this, and while reading that page, I found another source to add. I don't understand the concept of Apple making a machine that magically plays SNES games but I guess there it is. — Smuckola(talk) 23:07, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference link has changed
Talk:Jim Bolger

message: Why do we have a non-free image of Jim? He's not dead to my knowledge, so we should be getting someone take a free one. Richard001 (talk) 00:21, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added one of the free ones donated by people from Flickr, and removed the fair use image. None seem ideal for the lead image, though the one I have added would be quite good if it was cropped. Richard001 (talk) 09:49, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: I am not sure that Bolger was "affectionately" nicknamed "the Great Helmsman".  I thought the name was factitious and disrespectful - and a reference to Chairman Mao.124.197.15.138 (talk) 02:18, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nickname affectionate? 

message: You have added a paragraph about Cave Creek but have forgotten to add a reference. Schwede66 02:40, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cave Creek
Talk:Tookie

message: Change Redirect to a Disambiguation between the following three:
*Stanley "Tookie" Williams III American gangster
*Tookie Gilbert American baseball player
*Steve Peregrin Took English musician/songwriter and prominent member of the UK underground, frequently known socially as Tookie.
When this is done, remove Tookie disamiguation header text from Stanley Williams. 62.190.148.115 (talk) 11:42, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Fish+Karate 12:30, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks 62.190.148.115 (talk) 14:33, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 10 October 2018
Talk:Wilfred the Hairy

message: The page has recently been transferred to the much more familiar name Wilfred [sic] the Hairy. Is this "correction" in error? Or simply unthinking? --Wetman 13:30, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To what are you referring, Wetman? Srnec 03:44, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wilfred [sic]

message: * :Wilfred the Hairy →  — More common spelling at least, and it is possible that Wilfred is downright wrong, but I'm unsure. — 
* Most of the versions of the name in the article, including the name on the statue in the image, have the L. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 

message: In one place, the article says he was Count of Barcelona until 897, and in another it says 878. I have no idea which is correct, but they can't both be. Can they? --Cwelgo (talk) 22:16, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  End of reign as Count of Barcelona 

message: why named –the Hairy? Manytexts (talk) 05:28, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  name 

message: This article says, without a source, that he married Judith, but Judith's article doesn't mention him, although it mentions her three other husbands. Seems like an error. Richard75 (talk) 16:48, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriage
Talk:Robert Spencer/respect

message: Respect has nothing to do with what is going on here on your part. You think only Spencer cares about the accuracy of information about people involved in the anti-jihad resistance?
Yes, Respect does have a lot to do with what is going on here. We need to have a civil discussion on these topics, not wild accusations. And not personally directed remarks such as "what is going on here on your part". Regarding the second sentence, I am not sure I understand - could you rephrase your question?Yalto 07 Dec 2005
* Re: "You think only Spencer cares about the accuracy of information about people involved in the anti-jihad resistance?", what the writer may have been referring to is fact that the IP address used by the poster is registered as "spenwork.jihadwatch.org". It is, however, uncalled for to accuse the person at this IP address of misrepresenting themselves - I am sure JihadWatch has several people associated with it, and there is no evidence of misrepresentation. I think everyone needs to take a bit of a break and calm down a little.
* Nope. I am not Robert Spencer, just a Jihad Watch volunteer, and have no interest in or respect for Wikipedia anymore than I have respect for restroom wall graffiti. Any one can and does edit both. 
Still I see no reason to let half-truths stand, nor the previously deleted anti-Semitic tripe. Anne Crockett24.63.54.248 14:53, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Respect Discussion
Talk:Athletics at the 1984 Summer Olympics

message: What is the rationale for removing results from this table?  Unless you have a good reason for doing this please do NOT. David D. (Talk) 05:46, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Here we go again.  I will not revert for now.  But if you cannot come up with an explanation for deleting the results I will revert again.  i do not neccesarily like the imperical results but those are the results that were put in by a previous user.  Since this Olympics was in LA it makes some sense since the American public are not that literate with respect to metric.  As far as i am aware wikipedia has a policy of keeping metric and imperical measurements in an article.  David D. (Talk) 21:30, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Results
Talk:The Back Room (album)

message: Does anyone know what this is a picture of? I'd be eternally grateful. Antic-Hay 21:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was taken at Fort Point, San Francisco by a photographer called Wynn White. You can see the original here. — Matt Eason (Talk •  Contribs) 19:31, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks a lot!! :) Antic-Hay 15:06, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover Art