Talk:Udaipur

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:31, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 

message: Udaipur was established by Maharan Udai Singh II  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Indicom217 (talk • contribs) 15:28, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History edit 

message: Narayan Seva Sanasthan has got nothing to do with Udaipur's history or any information about udaipur.It is some kind of NGO  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Indicom217 (talk • contribs) 15:31, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference:link removed narayan seva sansthan 

message: An image used in this article, File:Lake Palace, Udaipur.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:46, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Lake Palace, Udaipur.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: The content on History of Udaipur has been copied and pasted from this article. Rollingcontributor (talk) 12:27, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the section and the tags. Added the link to the spun off page in 'See Also' section. --Adroit09 (talk) 07:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[History of Udaipur]] 

message: I apologise for the delay but here is an overview of all the major drawbacks of this article which need to be fixed before it can be nominated for GA:
*The lead is in a pretty bad shape first of all. The lead should summarise all the major topics of the article. Take cues from Kerala and New York City.
*For a city this significant historically, the History section is way too short. A lot can be (should be) added before it can satisfy the GA criteria. Mumbai and Kerala's History sections could be used as a guide perhaps.
*Geography section appears to be a bit disorganised; a couple of images can be dropped and the use of bullets can be reduced.
*Demographics and Government can be expanded, especially the latter is too short.
*Tourism: the entire section is essentially a list and should rather be in prose form. Kerala can be looked up for that again.
*Places nearby: I fail to see as to why there is a need for this section at all. It can easily be removed.
*The lists from Education should be turned into prose, and Media needs to be expanded a bit.
*This is perhaps the most significant issue in this article: the prose. The article is not neutral in a lot of places. There are far too many grammatical errors in the prose as well. A major overhaul would be required to fix this issue; perhaps WP:GOCE could help.
*References are a mess; a lot of bare links, dead links and improperly formatted refs. Most of the references need to fixed.
*The last thing is that a lot of prose in the article lacks citation; and it will take a considerable amount of time before all of the uncited facts can be referenced.
I hope that this gives a good enough idea as to why this is far from the GA status. Ping me whenever you need clarification or help with something. Regards, Yash! 16:34, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Yash! for providing such detailed feedback. We have already started working on your suggestions, and will surely be in touch in case we need any further assistance with this. Thanks again. Vishal0soni (talk) 03:42, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues with the article 

message: It should be pointed that this is disputed. His older brother Mahendra Singh Mewar is considered by many to be the actual holder of the title. Although Mahendra Singh was disinherited by his father Bhagwat Singh, Mahendra Singh was ritually proclaimed to be the successor Maharana after his father's death. The properties were willed by their father  to the younger brother Arvind Singh Mewar by his father.  Mahendra Singh, although now a person of modest means, is still regarded to be the Maharana by the locals.पुलिस ने महेन्द्र सिंह मेवाड़ के क्रिमिनल बैकग्राउंड की मांगी जानकारी, SSP ने माफी मांगी, Bhaskar News, Feb 17, 2018 "राजपूत समाज मेवाड़ क्षत्रीय महासभा के संरक्षक रावत मनोहर सिंह कृष्णावत ने कहा है कि पूर्व महाराणा महेन्द्र सिंह मेवाड़ राजपूतों के ही नहीं, बल्कि मेवाड़ के मानबिंदु हैं।"  वीरवर शिरोमणि पत्ता की मूर्ति का अनावरण, "वीरवर पत्ता की मूर्ति का अनावरण महाराणा महेन्द्र सिंह  मेवाड़ पुरे राजशाही लवाजमे के साथ में करेंगे"महाराणा मेवाड महेन्द्र सिंह का किया अभिनन्दन, "उदयपुर बजरंग सेना मेवाड एवं सकल राजपूत महासभा की ओर से बुधवार को मेवाड के महाराणा महेन्द्र सिंह मेवाड के ७५वीं जन्म दिवस पर कार्यकर्ताओं ने समोर बाग स्थित उनके निवास पर उन्हे माला, उमरणा, प्रताप की तस्वीर एवं प्रतीक चिन्ह देकर उनका अभिनन्दन किया गया"। 24 FEb 2016 [http://www.newindianexpress.com/entertainment/hindi/2017/dec/31/mahendra-singh-mewar-flays-cbfc-over-padmavati-1741141.html  Mahendra Singh Mewar flays CBFC over 'Padmavati', 
By IANS, 31st December 2017 "Mahendra Singh Mewar, the 76th Maharana of the Mewar dynasty and a former Lok Sabha member"]
Malaiya (talk) 23:00, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: "At present, Arvind Singh Mewar is the 76th custodian of the Mewar dynasty"

message: Vishal0soni (talk) 04:40, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page views 

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether :Portal:Udaipur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Udaipur until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 02:49, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[:Portal:Udaipur]] for deletion 

message: I can't help but notice that the image for Pratap Gaurav Kendra in the infobox very obviously appears to be edited/manipulated to misrepresent the scale of the statue. Should this image be removed from the article altogether? GeneralPoxter (talk • contribs) 02:02, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox image