Talk:Autonomic nervous system

message: Hello fellow Wikipediaes, I am Mustafa Bishara, I'm a molecular biology master degree student, and editing this article (Autonomic nervous system) was given to me as an assignment for Recent Developments in Biotechnology (MLC501/1) I participate as a student editor. I already completed Wikipedia training modules to be proficient in Wikipedia editing. I would appreciate any support. Best wishes. Moos beshara (talk) 09:43, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki Education Foundation - Supported Course Assignment. 

message: There is an inconsistence: While it is clear that sympathicus and parasympathicus have a part in the CNS, acknowledged also in this article, the ANS is said to be part of the peripheral nervous system in the first sentence.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.92.9.58 (talk) 10:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion regarding : regarding :! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to…) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. JFW | T@lk 01:25, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It should be considered that the body, especially the ANS (consisting of Sym and PARA components) does not wish anything. It merely responds to the information it recieves. I believe that, although the content of the article contains the basics, it is riddled with teological sentiment. The article may be improved by removing repetition, clarification of tract origins and innervation patterns. 
I'll can go along and try to clear up confusing remarks and attempt to clarify the logic in some places. The bulk of the article is anatomically orientated, I'm no anatomist, i'll concentrate more on the physiology.
Old discussion closed for archiving. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:11, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arguments, too teological?  

message: Encouraged by the discussion and agreeing with most people here that the article was not very useful in its present state, I ventured to rewrite entirely the Introduction and Anatomy. Apologies for this massive intervention. October 22-23rd 2006
November 4th 2006: I changed slightly the structure of the "Function" section (which would really need to be entirely rewritten) and the Overview of Actions that I renamed "Neurotransmitters and Pharmacology".
NB: my modifications of this page are attributed mainly to "84.37.64.199, "JayFBee", but also today (I guess I forgot to "sign in"?) "84.37.39.194", and a few more. Being new, I welcome a brief explanation on how not to constantly change identity...(I work on several computers).
Old discussion closed for archiving. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:11, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Intro and anatomy.