Talk:Marble House

message: There is a band called marble house so this page needs to be disambiguation page and 2 more pages need to be created. i dont know how to do it... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 60.241.245.73 (talk) 00:28, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Marble House in Newport is by far more notable. The others can be listed at Marble House (disambiguation). Charles 04:21, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  MArble House (band) 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Marble House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090812040007/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1143737094&ResourceType=Building to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1143737094&ResourceType=Building
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:47, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Should the lede image be changed from Image #1 to Image #2? Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:54, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: *Typical of Filetime to CANVASS other editors despite being warned against it. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:18, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: *Let's look at the WP:CANVASSING page, shall we? The page explicitly permits the notification of "editors who have made substantial edits to the topic or article." Ken has uploaded thousands of files, the vast majority of which are photographs of Rhode Island. Not to mention his thousands of edits to pages directly related to Rhode Island. If thousands of images and edits don't meet the threshold for "substantial edits," I'd like to know how many do? Should I wait for hundreds of thousands? Millions? Please let me know. Filetime (talk) 02:08, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: *It's not automatically canvassing to ping someone to a discussion -- only if you do so because you think that person will vote a certain way. That said, the appearance of canvassing can matter, too, and in this case it's ultimately unnecessary because I'm fairly sure  watches the WikiProject Rhode Island page (as do I), and a neutral notice there should make it unnecessary to ping. In other words, I think it's unlikely Filetime's done anything wrong in this regard, but if it's not ultimately necessary, there's no need to further inflame these threads (which already run rather hot). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 03:31, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC: Should the lede image be changed? 

message: *No - The current lede image shows the full front facade of the mansion, presenting this primary architectural aspect to the reader.  In contrast, the suggested replacement is shot from the side at an oblique angle, which necessarily foreshortens the building and does not give a true sense of its size or its architecture.  It serves neither the reader nor the mansion well. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:54, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: * See this option, which provides the same facade of the house, but is not of such poor technical quality. Filetime (talk) 00:27, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: *Typical of Filetime to CANVASS other editors despite being warned against it. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:18, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: *Let's look at the WP:CANVASSING page, shall we? The page explicitly permits the notification of "editors who have made substantial edits to the topic or article." Ken has uploaded thousands of files, the vast majority of which are photographs of Rhode Island. Not to mention his thousands of edits to pages directly related to Rhode Island. If thousands of images and edits don't meet the threshold for "substantial edits," I'd like to know how many do? Should I wait for hundreds of thousands? Millions? Please let me know. Filetime (talk) 02:08, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: *It's not automatically canvassing to ping someone to a discussion -- only if you do so because you think that person will vote a certain way. That said, the appearance of canvassing can matter, too, and in this case it's ultimately unnecessary because I'm fairly sure  watches the WikiProject Rhode Island page (as do I), and a neutral notice there should make it unnecessary to ping. In other words, I think it's unlikely Filetime's done anything wrong in this regard, but if it's not ultimately necessary, there's no need to further inflame these threads (which already run rather hot). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 03:31, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion