Talk:History of Portuguese

message: I don't see why this article is being moved back from history of Portuguese constantly. That title can only reasonably refer to the language in proper English. If it were called "history of the Portuguese" it would be different, but that's not a problem since it's not standard usage of English to use the language name that way and implies the people rather than the language. As far as I see it, only the langauge can be properly referred to in the singular indefinite form.
Peter Isotalo 08:51, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of Portuguese. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081006160601/http://www.arqueotavira.com/Mapas/Iberia/Populi.htm to http://www.arqueotavira.com/Mapas/Iberia/Populi.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:00, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of Portuguese. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20121208183539/http://www.revistadehistoria.com.br/v2/home/?go=detalhe&id=941 to http://www.revistadehistoria.com.br/v2/home/?go=detalhe&id=941
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It's more than a bit odd to have degemination listed as Lenition, but voicing not. Voicing is the classic oft-cited lenition of Western Romance (and it should be clearer in the text that it's phonemic). An argument can even be made that in its essence degemination is syllabic restructuring rather than a form of lenition tout court. That's getting much too deep into the weeds for a Wikipedia article IMO, but it should be presented that voicing is lenition as well, and that it's, e.g. /k/ > /g/, not simply [k] > [g]. Barefoot through the chollas (talk) 16:32, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voicing is Lenition 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:History of English which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 17:45, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:History of English which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 13:16, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: Portuguese language has a lot of influence from Arabic. A seemingly relevant fact that is completely omitted in the article. See https://alugha.com/article/92fe92f1-fd2e-11e8-83a9-034d661187a4?lang=eng  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.250.97.100 (talk) 13:42, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arabic roots missing 

message: Is it because all such words, e.g. primeiro, amar, are borrowings from Spanish, or is the current introduction to this section wrong and only n was elided in that position? 195.187.108.4 (talk) 18:30, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This is inaccurate: "In medieval Galician-Portuguese, /m/ and /n/ between vowels or at the end of a syllable became the velar nasal phoneme /ŋ/". Medial /mm/ and /m/ merged in the more general collapse of geminates due to /m/ undergoing no disturbance, unlike /n/. Note that there are no examples given of "elided" medial /m/. Barefoot through the chollas (talk) 18:03, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, that's what I'm talking about. No examples of medial m turning into nasalization, as if the part you're citing was inaccurate. 195.187.108.4 (talk) 18:35, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. The statement "In medieval Galician-Portuguese, /m/ and /n/ between vowels or at the end of a syllable became the velar nasal phoneme /ŋ/". is untrue. Barefoot through the chollas (talk) 20:11, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nasalization: no examples with medial 'm'