lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Housing Authority of New Orleans

message: This is essentially just a stub. I believe there is ample justification for its existance, and I will be working to find sources and content for it. I could continue to write based on what I know, but that wouldn't be quite as constructive as simply compiling references first. Wbbigtymer 18:19, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: At the moment I don't learn an enormous amount in this article that would not fit into the main New Orleans article. Perhaps this article could be expanded, but is it really necessary? Most articles for cities around the world make do without having a separate article devoted entirely to their public housing. However, I do appreciate that there is much about New Orleans that makes it special and that readers will want to know, so I will not presume to formally propose merger.Itsmejudith 17:49, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please consider merger with New Orleans 

message: This "stub" deals not with the Housing Authority of New Orleans, but the decision to demolish certain developments.  While this is certainly a topic for discussion, the Housing Authority of New Orleans manages units that are/were more than 60 years old.  Furthermore, the article only cites reasons for opposing the demolition of the housing authority.  The article seems to be promoting one side of history, and is therefore both controversial an inaccurate.Cpencik (talk) 23:06, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a Complete Article 

message: Currently the St. Bernard and B.W.Cooper complexes are being demolished.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.135.177.252 (talk) 21:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: There have been repeated edits over years changing the locations of multiple projects to incorrectly be in the 3rd_Ward_of_New_Orleans. Why? Where is this misinformation coming from?  Boundaries of the Wards_of_New_Orleans are set by City law; where they are is a matter of geography and legislation, not opinion.  Wondering, -- Infrogmation (talk) 02:09, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Wards

message: A request has been submitted to WikiProject Louisiana for a new article to be created on the topic of Housing in Louisiana. Please join the discussion or consider contributing to the new article. Best regards, -- M2545 (talk) 13:42, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Notification: [[Housing in Louisiana]]

message: Please join us on 13 December 2020, 12:00-14:00 EST, as we update and improve articles in Wikipedia related to housing in the United States of America. Sign up here. -- M2545 (talk) 09:57, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invitation to [[Wikipedia:Meetup/US_housing/December_2020|US Housing Edit-a-thon]] 

message: — Assignment last updated by DauntlessTim (talk) 21:39, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: XCOR 1012, Digitizing New Orleans
Talk:Space Family Robinson

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 17:31, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:30, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project

message: The article mentions - "and a comic series called Swiss Family Rollinson did appear in the British comic Knockout in 1954." - is that at all relevant ? Did it have any influence on this ? I will delete. -- Beardo (talk) 06:22, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Predecessors 

message: I suggest a separate article be created for the musical given there is no connection between it and the comic book and the fact links to this page from, say, the bio page for its star, Hannah Waddingham (whose presence alone give the musical enough notability for its own article) is somewhat misleading given the play has nothing to do with the comic book or the TV series. 136.159.160.121 (talk) 15:01, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate article for the musical
Talk:BLTC Research

message: It's unclear if this organization is actually notable per WP:WEB.  I'm not finding many references to it that aren't self-generated.  Try searching Google with "BLTC Research" -"was founded in 1995", which shows all references that aren't copies of the press release, and you get 195 hits.  This organization has a link farm of several hundred web sites, and many of the hits come from them.  It's unclear what's going on here. --John Nagle 00:53, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Belokrinitskoe Soglasie

message: The Belokrinitskoe Soglasie being a heresy or sect?
Labelling a certain church or religious movement heretical is mostly a rather controversial thing to do. Some may think the teachings a church or movement holds are a heresy, some others may not. Who has got the unquestionable authority to decide on what is a heresy and what isn't? It's obvious that one is dealing with a very delicate matter.
I for one am opposed to categories having anything to do with heresies, because one is bound to make subjective and arguable evaluations with which others are bound to disagree. In fact, I think that such categories are irrelevant.  
When it comes to the Old Believers of the Belokrinitskoe Soglasie, one should first aquire some more theological knowledge before starting labelling. At this moment, the Belokrinitskoe Soglasie is not treated as heretic (let alone as a sect!) by any one. This church is recognized by the Russian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate and by the Russian government. 
I very much want to point out that a term like "heresy" is not of a historical, but of a theological nature. No one treats the theological postulates of the Belokrinitskoe Soglasie as heretical, neither is this church regarded a "sect" nowadays. So treating the Russian Orthodox Old-Rite Church as heretic or as a sect is not at all NPOV - to say the least. --Vasilij 18:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:George Wombwell

message: Could someone clarify what sort of panthers Mr. Wombwell exhibited?  Panther links to a disambiguation page.  Leopards are already present in the list.  Did he have pumas and/or jaguars as well, or is it intended to specify melanistic leopards? - Slow Graffiti 18:27, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panther 

message: This says he had a gorilla, but the gorilla wasn't discovered by Westerners until 1902. Is there a citation available for this? 89.243.52.161 (talk) 21:56, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gorilla 
Talk:To the Death

message: No explanation as to what it is, not written in encyclopedic language, reads like it's copied from somewhere.  User:Zoe|(talk) 18:28, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like a Deep Space Nine episode. And certainly taken from somewhere, but I cannot find it online. JoaoRicardotalk  18:49, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I found it. It was taken from... Wikipedia! Seems like an attempt to fork this article. I've made a redirect. JoaoRicardotalk  18:51, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Simon Oosterman

message: Does anybody know when the next naked bike ride in auckland is happening? Mathmo 18:30, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: naked bike ride

message: He has gotten in trouble a lot. It looks like he has quite a few charges and has been involved in anti-police activies. Are there any further links or interviews? 
I have found the following activist areas he has been involved in:
* Animal rights
* Anti-GM
* Anti-police
* Anti-war
* Anti-taser (Another users addition)
Please add to the list. Meiom 12:39, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New sources?

message: He now works as a media liason for the National Distribution Union as per press releases on [] 219.89.56.227 07:13, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: media liason

message: He dated my sister when they were in high school. After she dumped him, she went out with his twin bother. Im serious, this is true. 222.154.243.247 (talk) 10:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: I know this guy
Talk:Guy Secretan

message: How many times has it been remarked that Guy looks like a donkey?  I think it is just once, and that was Caroline when she was making up insults.  If this is the case then it is not true to say that "people often remark he looks like a donkey".  -- Jbattersby 18:37, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:List of ships of the line of France

message: Should the "Ocean" type and it´s page not better be renamed "Commerce de Marseille class" after the first ship of the class instead of the third name of the second ship?   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.83.148.243 (talk) 08:23, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Ocean" type?

message: A number of ships have a star (*) sign after their name; what does that mean? Maybe we could replace this with a note to dynamically link to the caption for the symbol. Rama (talk) 08:55, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star 

message: For the record,  added mention of a ship named Montmorency on 11 September 2006 , but I have been unable to find any mention of either a Montmorency or Duc de Montmorency in either Demerliac or Roche. I am taking the liberty of removing the mention, feel free to restore if you know better. Rama (talk) 12:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Montmorency (c. 1826) 
Talk:HMS Implacable (1805)

message: Could the mysterious 'Disdainful' have been the frigate HMS Dédaigneuse?
Mhardcastle (talk) 09:04, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not. In early 1810 Dedaigneuse appears to have been in the East Indies. According to Winfield she did come back later in the year, but that would be too late for the story.Acad Ronin (talk) 12:28, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disdainful 

message: There's a video of the fate of the ship: https://twitter.com/Trois_Ponts/status/1737419227731026073
I just don't really know how to upload it to the article. Julien (talk) 13:42, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video of it's fate
Talk:Rhoda Scott

message: An earlier version of this article was apparently lifted largely from Scott's own website and it got yanked for copyright problems. I have put together the new article in my own words from various sources.
18:43, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Rhoda Scott is known principally as a Hammond organist. However currently there is no mention of this in her revised entry, which implies that she only plays church organ. Scott is so proficient on the Hammond that she is listed in the Wikipedia List of Hammond organ players List of Hammond organ players, noting that she is known for her work on a B-3 model and a B-3000 (custom model). I suggest that Hammond organist is included within her revised entry. Paul Strange (talk) 08:51, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hammond organ
Talk:French ship Valmy (1847)

message: This article makes it sound like the lack of tumblehome would decrease stability. That is what was thought at the time but the opposite is true, look at the way the waterplane area changes when the ship heels.LRT24 (talk) 20:13, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tumblehome

message: "Valmy was thought to be the largest sort of sailing ship possible, as larger dimensions made the management of rigging impracticable with mere manpower."
How this could be true, if the Duke of Wellington was laid down as a sail ship and was even bigger? I will delete this until a better explanation. Aozyk (talk) 16:38, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Biggest possible?
Talk:French ship Achille (1804)

message: The British and the french line of battle at Trafalga each had a ship named Achilles. An earlier 74 gun French battle ship named L’Achilles was captured by the British Navy on the Glorious First Of June 1794. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RichardHoldstock (talk • contribs)  22:00, 16 October 2014‎
:Close, but no, the British and French ships were both named Achille. The British ship launched in 1798 took the name from the captured French ship. The French had launched a new Achille in 1803. Both these ships were at Trafalgar, along with a British Neptune, a French Neptune and a Spanish Neptuno. Benea (talk) 23:09, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Talk:French ship Soleil Royal (1669)

message: "She was built in Brest between 1668 and 1670 by engineer Laurent Hubac, was launched in 1669"
So it was launched one year before it was done being built?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.10.170.59 (talk) 07:21, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Theory of Deadly Initials

message: I knew this would attract a deletion attempt. Well done to User:Dipics for getting in there so quick. This is not however a "speedy" candidate, unless I misunderstand something about the speedy policy - this is apparently a kosher theory, although I suspect it will prove to be complete bollocks. 
I'm removing the speedy tag - but feel free to nominate it for AfD. SP-KP 18:52, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As an average person, "patent nonsense" is exactly what this theory strikes me as.  FireWeed 20:11, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest that that is because you are not familiar with the meaning of "patent nonsense" in this context.  Please consult Wikipedia:Patent nonsense.  -- Dominus 21:47, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Why does a single study published 8 years ago and then refuted get an article on wikipedia?  Maybe we should link this article to the 300 page iphone bill article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.79.178.182 (talk) 08:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?
Talk:Dunkerque-class battleship

message: I have noticed that much of the development history of the class is duplicated each of the individual ships. This seems like a recipe for unnecessary work; if one article gets improved, it'll be necessary to remember to do the other one (and any other places where it is duplicated.) It seems easier to keep class specific information to the class article, and let the ship articles concentrate on ship history and other elements that make them unique.
EDIT: At the very least, instances of duplication should be radically downsized into a summary, as per Wikipedia:SUMMARY. I also note that USS Iowa (BB-61), a featured article, does something like that. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 17:32, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed (particularly including downsizing into a summary - one line for each subsection should work) - plus there is material (not copyedited) here that is a duplicate of that found in the Richelieu class battleship article (copyedited), as you noted there. Allens (talk | contribs) 18:28, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

text: Thanks and agreed! I've done a partial copyedit on the start of the History section summary (the Development subsection); you might take a look at the changes. Allens (talk | contribs) 21:56, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: For what it's worth, I've overhauled French battleship Dunkerque and cut down the technical details into a much shorter section with a  link to this article. I plan to improve the Strasbourg and class articles along similar lines in the relatively near future, and would like working with anyone else interested. Parsecboy (talk) 16:12, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: "Relatively near future"...like 7 years later... Parsecboy (talk) 16:32, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplication of class development history in three places

message: From my memory , joining the Free France Force wasn't on the ultimatum .
It was 1 ) scuttle ,2)  sail to a "safe " neutral shore , 3 )  to the caribean , 4) join the british in the fight
De Gaulle wasn't involved in this mess and thake a serious grieff against the british  prime minister
regard 2A01:CB00:456:9C00:715A:E48A:70A0:FA02 (talk) 05:55, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mers El Khébir
Talk:Seed (magazine)

message: I've moved this article from Seed magazine to Seed (magazine), as the magazine's complete name is just Seed. From inside cover: "Seed (ISSN 1499-0679) is published bimonthly by ...". — Asbestos | Talk  (RFC) 18:58, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Office (band)

message: It's good to have these, but there is no mention in the article about these two albums, i.e. when they were released, album details, etc.  I removed Q&A cuz it has its own article... perhaps that can be done for these other two from someone who knows something about them? -- eo 13:46, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tracklistings

message: I see three edits coming from users named massonglossies and scottmasson.  I have no way of determining if any of these are actually Scott Masson.  Does wikipedia still frown at self-editing articles that deal with you?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.215.212.237 (talk) 19:46, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Self Editing

message: I am a longtime follower and fan of Office. I played with the first iteration of the band way back in 2000. I looked them up here because I wanted to know the names of several of their albums and noticed that the article was under scrutiny for lack of citations and appearing to be an advertisement. I went through the article and added citations and cleaned up the information presented based on available sources online. Hopefully this will serve to increase the quality of the article and remove its status as a suspected advertisement. The band is, to my knowledge, no longer together, so there is no impetus for them to use a Wikipedia article as a platform for advertising. 
paco758 03:14, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of Citations

message: Hi y'all. This article has quite a bit of flowery language with content that is not supported by the provided sources. This is a problem, so I'm checking sources and removing content that doesn't line up.
Also removing: 
- Sources which are not reliable sources (blog posts, links to iTunes pages (I mean come on, an iTunes page!)) etc.
Curdigirl (talk) 19:34, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing unsourced content
Talk:Francis Graham-Smith

message: Why Graham-Smith? I believe that Graham is a forename, not part of the surname! (eg I recollect hearing Martin Ryle talk about him as 'Graham', and the Greewich2000 bio refers to him as 'Smith').Linuxlad
:But in the list of Fellows of the Royal Society, his entry under 'Smith, Francis Graham' is redirected back to Graham-Smith. Linuxlad_
::I believe that he was hyphenated when he was knighted. 82.163.24.100 (talk) 21:07, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Both Smith himself, and his cousins, who included my recently-deceased father, call him "Graham" as his usual forename, with "Smith" as his surname.  I have no written documentation, other than a personal email.  (I myself am not in regular contact with Graham.) It does appear that in his earlier writings, or rather earlier editions of his writings, as author his name did not have the hyphen and his full name was often shown as "F. Graham Smith". Acwilson9 (talk) 04:06, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Underhanded C Contest

message: This looks like an advert for a contest rather than an article about an existing one. 84.70.132.186 19:11, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

message: If anyone has time (I may try sometime later on) the possible extensions for this document are: competition controversy, reasons for the competition. Maybe list of exploits used in previous contests. Anything else? Nachmore 03:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lessons learned. Esmito (talk) 21:06, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Extensions 

message: There have been no updates since 2009's contest rules, and no winners have been announced since it ended a year ago. Should it be mentioned that it's been abandoned? That's no way to run a contest with a prize. 72.48.75.131 (talk) 03:24, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abandoned? 

message: Is there any information regarding the site that the contest is announced? Xcott.com is apparently taken over by a cybersquatter. Is there a new site?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.9.13.137 (talk) 15:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Site is back up now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.9.13.137 (talk) 15:18, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  xcott.com site is down 
Template talk:House of Savoy

message: Recent edits have made this template about two page views long, which makes it both an eyesore and almost useless as a quick navigation tool.  Can someone who knows something about it cut it down, dramatically? - BT 19:11, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  long 

message: This is absurd. The template seems to based on the notion that the House of Savoy began with Vittorio Emanuele II. I am going to add a couple of his missing children then remove it from his article. —Ian Spackman 16:45, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  short 

message: The years and unnecessary extra titles in the template make the template look awful. (Example: Emanuele Alberto (born 16 March 1851), Count of Mirafiori and Fontanafredda).
As I'm sure there are those who have placed a lot of hard work on it, I will not change anything. I might recommend however that those responsible change the template for easier reading and search. Ruby2010 (talk) 22:15, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eye sore 

message: A request for comments which may impact this template has been started at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies#RfC on style in royal family templates. You are welcome to comment there. Fram (talk) 14:28, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC notification
Talk:Ōuchi gari

message: Please see my  discussion on my first technique page attempt,
Kata Guruma. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pereza (talk • contribs) 19:14, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New section

message: Done. I confirmed it by Kodokan's waza list. --Nightshadow28 15:31, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese script 
Talk:Cecil Gant

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 18:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem