Talk:John Lukacs

message: I've gone ahead and removed the Judaism tag.  Lukacs was ethnically half-Jewish but had no more to do with Judaism as a religion than any other Roman Catholic.  I suspect that the inaccurate tag may have been the result of an Irving-like attempt to dismiss Lukacs' scholarship related to Hitler as the work of a "Jewish historian," as A.S. Brown notes below. Biasedbulldog (talk) 02:54, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Judaism?

message: from John Lukacs: Visionary, Critic, Historian: "In the United States, even though I have been categorized among them, I have become more impatient with the conservatives when they are not truly conservatives. I’m a traditionalist. I’m not a defender of the Catholic Church. I don’t think the church is reactionary at all. I do believe the church was created by Christ, that the teachings of Christ are the pure gold, its people are not or rarely so, and gold without alloy is unusable. So the church and the people and priests may be—often are—fallible." NotPatBuchanan (talk) 00:24, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Catholic Church

message: I removed the following paragraph:
"In the 1970s, Lukacs served as one of the advisors for the British historian Simon Newman’s book March 1939 concerning the reasons for the British “guarantee” of Poland in March 1939”Newman, Simon March 1939, Claredon Press: Oxford, United Kingdom, 1976 page viii. Newman’s book provoked much debate as Newman argued the “guarantee” was meant by Neville Chamberlain to start a war with Germany. Newman wrote that World War Two was not “Hitler’s unique responsibility…” and rather contended that “Instead of a German war of aggrandizement, the war become one of Anglo-German rivalry for power and influence, the culmination of the struggle for the right to determine the future configuration of Europe”Newman, Simon March 1939, Claredon Press: Oxford, United Kingdom, 1976 page 6"
The paragraph is misleading.  The only reason to insert the paragraph is to imply that Lukacs in some way concurs with Newman's thesis, which he clearly does not (reading Five Days in London, The Duel, or The Last European War makes that entirely clear).  The paragraph serves no explanatory purpose re Lukacs, because contributing research does not mean that he agrees with the author's thesis.  If we included all the works that he contributed to in any way, the article would be absurdly long. Biasedbulldog (talk) 00:14, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Paragraph re Newman

message: I wonder if Mr. Lukacs has ever commented publicly on Daniel Goldhagen and/or the latter's book "Hitler's Willing Executioners"? He seems like he would have a very interesting and critical response. Historian932 (talk) 00:48, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Commentary on Goldhagen?

message: I changed "only novel" to "most experimental work." You could potentially call it a novel in the widest possible sense, but it's misleading. It is much closer to a short story collection than a novel, but then there are not really plots in the vignettes anyway. Biasedbulldog (talk) 06:08, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: A Thread of Years ≠ Novel

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on John Lukacs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090512042838/http://www.boston.com:80/news/globe/ideas/articles/2005/03/06/the_anti_populist?mode=PF to http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2005/03/06/the_anti_populist?mode=PF
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:50, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Substituted at 20:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: I read in a letter Lukacs' wrote that he thought the Jewish community had 'undue influence' in American political and intellectual life. That would suggest that, although Lukacs is racially Jewish, he holds moderately Anti-Jewish views, and would be evidence against Irving's denigration of Lukacs as a 'pro-Jewish historian'. Should that be included in the article? The book is Through the History of the Cold War: The Correspondence of George Kennan and John Lukacs. The quote is on page 247, . Should the quote be included to show Irving's description of Lukacs' is mistaken, or no?RandomScholar30 (talk) 10:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  I've seen an Anti-Jewish quote from Lukacs, should it be included? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on John Lukacs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060516020207/http://www.nationalism.org/library/science/ideology/lukacs/Lukacs-TMPR-2002.pdf to http://www.nationalism.org/library/science/ideology/lukacs/Lukacs-TMPR-2002.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060112132809/http://www.goodreports.net/reviews/thehitlerofhistory.htm to http://www.goodreports.net/reviews/thehitlerofhistory.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:23, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified