lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:German Air Force Regiment

message: This article is a mess! It is called Objektschutzbataillon but it mainly deals with the newly established regiment. I suggest we create a new article "Objektschutzregiment" in line with the corresponding Wiki sites on the RAF Regt and others, which could use the majority of this very article. Then we relink "Objektschutzbataillon" there.
Considering the naming conventions it should rather be "German Air Force Regiment" De728631 16:31, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A Google search comes up with 7000+ hits for "German Air Force Regiment" and the term "air force regiment" is in fact often used for force protection units of various nations. Per Wikipedia's naming convention we are required to use the most common English term for a page name, which is not always the most logical one. So if other articles on other Luftwaffe regiments are created then those can have an adequate title like "... training regiment" if there is no standard English translation. De728631 (talk) 23:56, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming?
Talk:German cruiser Seydlitz

message: Difficult to understand why a ship 95% was not just pushed through and commissioned. Seki1949 (talk) 02:09, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: They assumed it would be a short war, that Seydlitz would not enter service before the end of the conflict, and that they would resume construction once they were victorious. As the war dragged on, manpower shortages, especially as officers and men were drawn away for the U-boat arm, and the infeasibility of using surface raiders successfully (at least actual warships - the auxiliaries are a different question) militated against completing the ship as a cruiser. Parsecboy (talk) 14:48, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense, Thanks! Seki1949 (talk) 04:22, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

text: Actually not sure which conflict is meant here ... France, Norway, UK ? I mean in 1940 Hitler's idea was to attack the UK next, not the Soviet Union. And for that purpose they could have used more or less anything that floats. I think I would like a deeper explanation for stopping that boat at that point in time. One would probably have to check what they did instead. At that time there was still enough capacity for anything they wanted. Maybe it was before the French fleet was lost to the Germans ? JB. --92.193.146.62 (talk) 23:32, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  95% complete
Talk:Albatros-class fast attack craft

message: Shouldn't this be spelled with 2 s's - Albatross class fast attack craft?  -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 22:10, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, if that's the case then the spelling on the links to this page should also have one s.  -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 12:53, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of article title

message: link to FPB-57 came here but not a word on FPB-57 here  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.43.213.174 (talk) 13:54, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  FPB-57 

message: My survey vessel was threatened with ship arrest for surveying without a permit a few years ago by a Tunisian naval vessel that I photographed whilst we were busy bribing its senior officers. Looks exactly like the German-service Type 143 photos. The Exocet launchers are very much in evidence. Did the Tunisians reinstate them? Either way, it would appear that the Wiki article information that the Tunisian Albatros's are without Exocet is wrong, assuming I was looking across a very narrow piece of Med' at an ex-German Albatros flying the Tunisian flag.
If someone can explain how I upload a photo I'll post one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.11.141.248 (talk) 22:27, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query Exocet deletion on Tunisian export 

message: Most of the vessels in the class were indeed originally named after birds of prey, but the albatross and cormorant are definitely NOT such birds!--Death Bredon (talk) 20:09, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birds of prey?
Talk:Rheinmetall Mk 20 Rh-202

message: Consequently, the article title and text are wrong when they use a small k. The article should be called "Rheinmetall MK 20 Rh 202". --84.132.155.16 (talk) 13:59, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's not "Mark", it's "Maschinenkanone" 
Talk:Oste-class fleet service ship

message: I have commented out the image on this page, as it doesn't appear to exist. Either the link is mispelled or the image has been deleted. If somebody knows, either reinstate the link correctly spelled or remove it entirely; which ever is right to do. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. 23:06, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  what happened with the image? 

message: Someone with a knowledge of German can find more information about this service at https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flottendienstboot, and it could be entered here, with the proper sources. GeorgeLouis (talk) 16:29, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Service in Syria 
Talk:Ben Ammi Ben-Israel

message: Interesting person. More balanced review in his New York Times obituary: http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/01/01/world/middleeast/ben-ammi-ben-israel-leader-of-black-americans-who-migrated-to-israel-dies-at-75.html --75.161.156.131 (talk) 17:09, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable source for sprucing up article  

message: I'm working on cleaning up, referencing, and expanding this article in light of Ben Ammi's death. Would welcome any thoughts or help! Zhujiangshuiguai (talk) 16:18, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup/Expansion in Progress
Talk:Taktisches Luftwaffengeschwader 71 "Richthofen"

message: #Support - I for one support the merging of Jagdgeschwader 71 with Fighter Wing 71 as both articles are about the same division of the Luftwaffe, just different time periods. I feel they should be combined into a single article under the original Jagdgeschwader 71 name. This new article should detail the history of the fighter wing from its foundation in WWII up to present day. I see no reason to keep the history of the division separated. Fallschirmjäger 12:17, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge article with Fighter Wing 71 
Talk:SMS Panther

message: The SMS PANTHER first mission was to block Venezuelan ports in 12-9-1902. Others germans battleships as Gazelle, Falke, Vineta, Sperber, Batter, Stush and Charlotte were comissioned as well in that mission. The block of Venezuela in 1902 was a operation lead by England, German and Italy suposly to claim the downpayment of an large and old debt of the southamerican country. Some history books and articles claim that this movement of englands and germans boats was a strategic manouver to see how far United States was commited with their Monroe Doctrine.
The SMS PANTHER fougth with the fortress of San Carlos, near Maracaibo, where it was hit by the venezuelan artillery and was force to retreat to Curazao for repairs. There are many books on this topic, many of them are part of the venezuelan history. I suggest to see for example, http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloqueo_Naval_a_Venezuela_de_1902-1903  from spanish wikipedia, http://www.fav-club.com/articulos/bloqueo/bloqueo.htm from an army club in venezuela... If you like i can find you the names of the books in spanish
Jose Puerta
10-21-09  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.210.134.23 (talk) 22:36, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  FIRST MISSION OF THE PANTHER AND HE WAS HIT 

message: I removed this explanation of "Gunboat diplomacy":
:a term used especially by the British, first in 1850 with the British display of naval power at Piraeus. The term refers to diplomatic demands backed up by a show of force
It seems unnecessary here.  Anyone interested in learning more about the phrase can click the link to the Gunboat diplomacy article.
- Zulu Kane (talk) 18:44, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gunboat diplomacy 
Talk:German submarine U-49 (1939)

message: In the 'Fourth patrol' section we are told that: "She was never heard from again", but in the 'Fate' section "there were 41 survivors". Does this mean that 41 men did not say a word for the rest of the war? Because that is the inference at the moment.
Something in this article is not right.
RASAM (talk) 21:37, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Survivors
Talk:P-class cruiser

message: "The fore 28 cm turret would have been superfiring over the fore 15 cm turret; the layout was reversed for the aft pair of turrets."
Does this seem wrong? The limited info I can find on this class, along with other known layouts, would make it much more likely the smaller turrets would be above the larger, both fore and aft. Russ3Z (talk) 18:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm away from most of my library, including Gröner, but I'll be back home this weekend, and can confirm the armament layout. Parsecboy (talk) 18:07, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armament layout problem?
Talk:La Cañada High School

message: i noticed that the picture of the IRC (imformation resource center) is not updated. during the past year, the IRC was redesigned. Updated pictures should be put in.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.41.180.12 (talk) 16:09, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  update pictures 

message: (moved from my userpage, in response to something on blocked user LCHSadmin's userpage, moving here because it is about the school) tedder (talk) 23:54, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This should stay on your page, but I guess I'll keep it here. First, the school doesn't own the Wikipedia article. More importantly, challenges to notability of an individual (such as Pollara) should be done by requesting the Pollara article be deleted with a proper rationale. The article exists, and as such is eligible to be listed on La Canada High School's page. tedder (talk) 23:52, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pollard notability 

message: In my mind, This incident is worthy of inclusion on the article. It's an event that occurred, no different than if the school was the target of vandalism or arson, or if the school had notable athletic accomplishments. It's a short entry (a long sentence, really), so it's hard to say that it is undue. Finally, care has been taken to avoid BLP:1E type issues. Comments? tedder (talk) 01:17, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diversity training incident 

message: Basically everything on this page is uncited.  We should look at finding citations or removing the page. Apriestofgix (talk) 22:23, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations Needed
Talk:Spähkreuzer 1938

message: The article's original text seems to have been lifted verbatim from the listed source . According to their copyright notice, that is a private site and the text is not freely available. I've taken out all the remaining original text - I think we are safe with the tabular data and categories, and the rewritten lede. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 12:12, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for addressing this. I have deleted the paste from history. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:59, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem.
Talk:Colonia, Oxnard, California

message: This is an article about a neighborhood, not a gang. Save the Hispanic street-gang babble for a gang forum.
So...the information about the boxing gym (the only bright spot in the whole neighborhood) gets deleted in favor of a detailed description of the local Mexican gang...not hard to see why it's such a crappy place, just look at what's more important in this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.108.49.30 (talk) 19:40, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a gang forum 

message: Many people have passed by and used the Baseball Fields for their activities such as running it's length as a track field to playing soccer. What many people fail to realize is there is another use. BASEBALL...that's right it is used for the use of tee ball for many neighborhood children. There is a link to www.leaguelineup.com/2009eslittleleague. 
As of 2/16/09, there will be tryout for the tee-ball aged children to the major aged children. For more information visit the website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.145.220.19 (talk) 18:28, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Eastside Little League
Talk:Notorious Tourist from the East

message: Does anyone have info on track times for this album?
#"Notorious Tourist from the East" – ?:??
#"Soliloquy" – ?:??
#"Hangin' Loose" – ?:??
#"Memory" – ?:??
#"After Mr. Teng" – ?:??
Pugetbill (talk) 15:26, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Track times
Talk:La Costa Canyon High School

message: Needs to be edited to comply with Wikipedia standards.  This isn't a newspaper, it's an encyclopedia. If I had to read a newspaper I'd got to the back of my yard, dig a large hole, sleep in it for a day, then go eat a couple tacos. Then I'd buy a newspaper from old Jeremy down the way. Jeremy needs the money you see. He has a undiagnosable disease that makes me want him so utterly badly. 76.171.5.82 (talk) 20:17, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Football Program 2008... My Love Affair With Old Man Jeremy 

message: "My friend was caught in affair with my mother." = This is pretty blatant.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.180.186.224 (talk) 14:41, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motherly Bias 
Talk:La Salle College Preparatory

message: Why is the POV tag on this talkpage? ----moreno oso (talk) 23:23, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I see what the Schools WP wrote above but I must be missing the POV stuff. Now, Refimprove I agree with. It needs more references. ----moreno oso (talk) 23:27, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect placement of POV tag

message: Only one entry in the notable alumni has references. This one shouldn't need one. 216.48.157.94 (talk) 17:58, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Really, they all should!  Everything on Wikipedia must be verifiable (WP:V).  Verifiability is grounded in reliable sources (WP:RS).  It is a typical convention on lists of notables, that a list entry needs to have an article of its own to establish its notability, and a reference to establish the connection of the individual to the current article.  Typically, editors will let it slide if there is one or the other, but if you want to be confident that your edits will have staying power it is best if they have both.  You stand a chance of getting Velasco on your list if you provide a reliable reference; that would be good enough for me.  Thanks for your help in improving this article! Jacona (talk) 20:27, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philip Velasco 
Talk:Sumie (Toshiko Akiyoshi Quartet album)

message: The song "P.A.J." seems to also have an alternate Japanese title "再会” (SAIKAI).  It also appears to be written by someone other than Akiyoshi.  If anyone has any good references for this song's origins (songwriter) I hope they will add that info to this article.  I presume "P.A.J." stands for "Personal Aspect in Jazz" but I have not seen that made explicit anywhere. Pugetbill (talk) 15:21, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: P.A.J. ???
Talk:Meditation (Toshiko Akiyoshi Quartet album)

message: When researching this article I came upon a Japanese language web site / music blog that included a statement implying the later re-issues of this recording had been re-mixed somehow.  I have not been able to find a reliable confirmation of this and it seems a relatively minor fact so I have removed the statement from the article.  Removed "...Later re-issue(s) includes some re-mixing of the original tracks."
Pugetbill (talk) 16:50, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Album re-issue and re-mixing
Talk:Lafayette Square, Los Angeles

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Harbor City, Los Angeles, California which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 19:31, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Interested editors can also comment at Talk:Los Angeles Purplebackpack89 (Notes Taken) (Locker) 22:39, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There has been multiple discussions on various Los Angeles pages about using this descriptive. Here is the longest: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sherman_Oaks,_Los_Angeles#Affluence 
It has been removed from Sherman Oaks, West Hills, Encino and various LA pages.  This is an empty subjective word and consensus prevailed against using it.   Phatblackmama (talk) 20:21, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Affluent
Talk:Yiftach Brigade

message: Also, see this photo file and its text: "Palmach archive Yiftach 3rd Battalion Hachsharot 1 album 9/18". There's no mention in the History section of a 3rd Battalion staffed with Palmach soldiers, just 1st, 2nd and 7th. Also, why would Palmach soldiers go for hachshara vocational training on a farm? Sounds more like Nahal. Or is the meaning a different one? Mystery. Arminden (talk) 01:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: When established? When dissolved?
Talk:Negev Brigade

message: While essentially the information in the article is accurate, there's a problem that it identified this unit as a past brigade, while in truth the unit is alive and kicking, and has never been disbanded AFAIK. I will correct this eventually, but it may take a long time to find sources for expand the article, so it would be great if someone else could do the necessary research. —Ynhockey (Talk) 16:46, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual accuracy
Talk:Israeli MIAs

message: . 217.205.76.120 (talk) 14:50, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Add Disappearance of Ron Arad to the See Also section. Arguably the most well-known IDF MIA soldier. The article also highlight the extend to which the Israel government & IDF try to bring back their soldiers. Long2181998 (talk) 12:15, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Actualcpscm (talk) 14:00, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 June 2023 

message: The correct name is Avraham (Avi) Lanir. There's a seperate article for him: Avraham Lanir. Utzli (talk) 22:00, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lieutenant Colonel Avi Nir
Talk:Laguna Hills High School

message: Please allow disputed facts to remain.  The best way to expose what you feel to be a canard is to present a cogent argument.  Unwarranted vicissitudes serve neither the wikipedia community nor your point of view. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roryallen (talk • contribs) 
:Keep in mind that the Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an opinion piece nor a blog, so it has certain stadards for the information that goes into an article, as well as the tone of that information, including Verifiability and Neutral point of view. For further information, please see the Wikipedia Policies and guidelines, and the Wikipedia Manual of Style. BlankVerse 20:49, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed Facts

message: Whats with all the asian references?
SohailKhanifar 23:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Toshiko–Mariano Quartet (in West Side)

message: I have been unable to locate a source for track times for the three songs on Side 'B' of this recording.  Side 'A' of this album is the same as side 'B' of East & West.  If any Wikipedia editor can find a source for Side B track times, I hope they will add them here and in the article itself.  
Side 'A;
#"Tonight" (Bernstein, Sondheim) – 6:12 
#"Something's Coming" (Bernstein, Sondheim) – 2:24 
#"America" (Bernstein, Sondheim) – 4:47 
#"Maria" (Bernstein, Sondheim) – 4:35  
#"Cool" (Bernstein, Sondheim) – 3:43  
Side 'B'
#"Plaisir D'Amour" (Martini) – 
#"Malagueña" (Lecuona) – 
#"Oleo" (Rollins) – 
Pugetbill (talk) 15:00, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Track times
Talk:Berlin Alexanderplatz (miniseries)

message: Can someone clarify a bit on the 1980's filmed version of the TV series? Hoverfish 12:54, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  As Film 

message: The synopsis of part one now has a minor flaw which I am unable to rectify without removing the fairly significant detail I have added. It is unclear in the sequence where Biberkopf reads the districts of Berlin from which he is barred from living in are all of the Berlin districts existing in 1928, but in the last scene, where he announces he can remain in Berlin, it is implied as having been the case. Perhaps a fault of the subtitles? Philip Cross (talk) 20:05, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Synopsis

message: the prior synopsis suggests Franz listened to a communist speaker. though espousing some ideals of communism, the speaker denounces the Reichstag, as well as the socialists and communists therein. The worker they talk to later suggests militant organization is key, particularly the organization of a general strike.. Later, in Part 10, Eva suggests Franz is hanging out with unseemly communists or anarchists. I wonder if this militant anti-state speaker better represents anarchists (or anarcho-communists), particularly since a variety of marxists and communists have been already represented, and given the vehemence of his anti-state position. Kbozbj (talk) 01:37, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Communism" in part 9
Talk:Operation Plumbat

message: Just wondering, how did Germany react?--85.144.133.46 (talk) 11:37, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: question

message: The first paragraph and the sources (note the identical formatting; unique, not MLA, nor APA) of this stub were lifted from http://intellit.muskingum.edu/israel_folder/israelplumbat.html
Since then changes have been made, such as naming the ship and the Turkish port, but otherwise it is a verbatim plagiarism. The original author went to great lengths to document the sources, thus is is highly unlikely that Wikipedia was the one that was plagiarized. In the search for a better article, we might heed the advice of the original author and set aside
* Eisenberg, Dennis, Eli Landau, and Menahem Portugali. Operation Uranium Ship. New York: Signet, 1978.
as a source. The original author cites
* Constantinides, George C. Intelligence and Espionage: An Analytical Bibliography. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1983.
as concluding that Eisenburg et al's report that "the disappearance in 1968 of a cargo of uranium 'is either unreliable or unsubstantiated'." Rather, we should review the book "The Plumbat Affair" by Davenport, Eddy, and Gilman, . Since this book, as well as the others are nearly 30 years old, I suspect it may be awhile before this article becomes more than a stub. Until then, the plagiarized material is better removed, for if it is left in, it will only be corrected through paraphrasing, which is still a copyright violation. Sorry for making a stub stubier. 216.199.224.138 (talk) 21:41, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism
Talk:Live at Birdland (Toshiko – Mariano Quartet)

message: Apparently these 1960 / 1961 live recordings were first (?) released in 1991 by Fresh Sound Records in Europe.  At least I have not been able to find any reference to an earlier release of this material.  One source (link) does indicate a 1961 release - but on a label that was not founded until 1983 - so I tend to discount that source.  If anyone can find a reliable source of info indicating an earlier (LP?) release of this material, please add it to this article - with the appropriate citation.  Otherwise I presume the 1991 released date is the correct date to use.  Pugetbill (talk) 16:12, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Release Date
Talk:Laguna Niguel, California

message: Would it be notable to list information to talk about the Laguna Niguel heist that occured in the bank in the center of the city? --~~  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.250.67.100 (talk) 16:34, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bank heist