Talk:Mount Isa Mines

message: Considering that the mining technology is detailed throughout the article does it need a technology section of its own? - Shiftchange (talk) 07:43, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I was considering changing the 1973-2003 section to group the technologies within it. At the moment I am still browsing through historical papers digging up bits and pieces. It is all still a work in progress. Separately, I have prepared an article outlining the development of the Isasamelt process and am thinking of doing the same for the others. The Isasmelt article is still awaiting approval by the reviewers. It has managed to work its way to about position 100 on the list. -  (CRF talk). ChrisFountain (talk) 02:33, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technology section 

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.mining-technology.com/projects/mount_isa_copper/mount_isa_copper3.html
*:Triggered by \bmining-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:06, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Mount Isa Mines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130815012605/http://www.isaprocess.com/EN/Pages/default.aspx to http://www.isaprocess.com/EN/Pages/default.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304065011/http://www.isasmelt.com/EN/Installations/Pages/Installations.aspx. to http://www.isasmelt.com/EN/Installations/Pages/Installations.aspx.
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110812043939/http://www.xstrata.com/assets/acquisition/mim/pdf/XTA_MIM_Acquisition_Rights_Issue_07_04_03.pdf to http://www.xstrata.com/assets/acquisition/mim/pdf/XTA_MIM_Acquisition_Rights_Issue_07_04_03.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110321095323/http://www.derm.qld.gov.au/register/p00192aa.pdf to http://www.derm.qld.gov.au/register/p00192aa.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.derm.qld.gov.au/media/environmental_management/mt_isa/mim-metals-report.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:12, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: Both are used, throughout the history section. It looks a bit messy like that… 
Also, t/y is used a lot.  Yay or nay? I’ve replaced this by tons per year in the the 1946-1963 subsection, but not beyond there.Boscaswell talk 04:34, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tonnes or tons?