lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Onkelos

message: I have corrected the story of the conversion. Onkelos is said to have summoned three individuals not 2, Titus as well as Balaam and Yeshu. Moreover its "Yeshu" not "Yoshke" and saying that this is a reference to Jesus is POV bias, see the Yeshu article. The order of individuals Titus, Balaam, Yeshu suggests that is a reference to someone who lived before Balaam. Kuratowski's Ghost 23:03, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Euskaltzaindia

message: This article borrowed heavily from the Euskaltzaindia web page  .  Unfortunately this article says that Euskaltzaindia believes that Basque is an Indo-European language when the group's web page says that it isn't, right on the front page.  This article needs to be rewritten.
The phrase "Academy watching the official Basque language" is a bit odd.  If the Euskaltzaindia has an analagous function to Real Academia Española, the phrase used by that article ("...is the institution responsible for regulating the xxx language.") seems like a better choice.  -- John Fader 02:20, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is an ambiguous Basque link in the "Creation" section. I'm not sure how to redirect this. Gil Gamesh 13:09, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ambiguous link
Talk:Sais

message: Alright, this is silly.  Given that there are only two Saises, one should be a direct link with a dab on top.  There is no need for a disambiguation page.  I've already had a conversation with User:Nefertum17 stating my ambivalence about making Sais, Egypt primary.  This seems like a perfectly rational way to do it, given that SAIS is not a proper name and Sais is. - BanyanTree 23:46, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:USS New Mexico (SSN-779)

message: This page says that SSN-779 is the third New Mexico, while USS New Mexico says that it is the second.  Which is right?  --203.56.47.30 23:51, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Tiptronic

message: Most of the information in this article should be moved.  Tiptronic really does refer to just the Porsche implementation, and all of the pros and cons (most of which are inaccurate in this article anyway) should be moved to a new Manumatic transmission (or similarly named) article.  In the worst case, it should be merged into the appropriate section of the automatic transmission article. --Milkmandan 00:07, 2005 Feb 21 (UTC)
Don't you just hate it how every manufacturer has to come up with a different name? It seems that none of them want to be compared according to features, all somehow believing that they will win the brand-name marketing war. It gets worse though; see quattro, which is applied to two radically different technologies. Grrr... AlbertCahalan 22:54, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's funny (given the above complaints about trademarks) that you use DSG transmissions (a phrase which may be redundant) as a generic term when it is a VW trademark.  The Wikipedia article about such transmissions is dual clutch transmission. --anon. 141.149.54.135 (talk) 22:43, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Insular biogeography

message: The species equilibrium diagram needs to be in the article. They are a basic part of the theory and would add immensely to the clarity.
Article also needs an adequate discussion of the development of the conservation biology uses and consequences. 
Descriptions of Diamonds bird studies and Simberloffs insects studies would be useful.
There must be someone out there with an adequate summary section from a thesis that intro that could be condensed into here.
Need to remove the grey literature references and replace with source studies...74.78.122.238 (talk) 16:56, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Added figure based on MacArthur and Wilson (and, indirectly, Darlington). More needed, obviously. MarkM (talk) 09:57, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs several diagrams after MacArthur and Wilson and more citations

message: — Assignment last updated by Crystalm2392 (talk) 02:17, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: BioEE1610 Writing in the Majors
Talk:Atso Almila

message: According to the first several pages of a Google search this is the most comprehensive source on the conductor in English. --Oldak Quill 02:19, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Feng Yun (Go player)

message: * Work begun. -Fernando Rizo 02:48, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikifying

message: If she's the second to get 9-Dan, who's the first? 165.230.46.71 17:25, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Rui Naiwei. Can 11:13, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First
Talk:CARINE

message: Although original research is generally frowned upon in Wikipedia, this research has actually been implemented into a usable program and receives a decent number of google hits.  It has encyclopedic value, and is not recommended for VfD.  Eric Herboso  03:03, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice of Original Research

message: I dont understand a word of the article! --Jestix 17:45, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the "too technical" tag.  Feel free to add it back, but please leave some suggestions as to how the article could be improved.  Note that the article is a stub; don't expect too much from it.  Lunch 02:28, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  technical 

message: Should the title really be all caps? // 213.89.53.155 (talk) 18:02, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Lehigh Valley Railroad/to do

message: * Add a system map
* Add photos of LV trains
** Possibly include a photograph of the system map boxcar
* Expand the history
* Add data on the railroad's finances
* Add a list of railroad presidents
* Possible section on the varying liveries of the LV in the postwar period.
* Change herald to full color (black diamond on RED background)greg (talk) 14:56, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Aesthetic Realism

message: Modified the lede to include difference between Aesthetic Realism and other approaches to mind and to include the Chairman of Education.  Made the definition of Aesthetic Realism exact (as described by founder) and less informal.
Per comment below by Outerlimits, I clarified the explanation of Aesthetic Realism in relation to poetry, philosophy, and classes but did not touch the section on homosexuality. Lore E. Mariano (talk) 13:26, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Other than to move sections you prefer above it to push it further down the page to a more hidden position, you mean. - Outerlimits (talk) 16:15, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: As others have noted this article does not seem to be neutral. Every claim opposed to this group and its ideas appears to be refuted rather than left as neutral. mnewmanqc (talk) 03:04, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Section edited, taking out long defenses and explanations in order to clarify opposing points of view.  LoreMariano (talk) 18:37, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

text: Actually, you seem to have eliminated cited points of view and eliminated references that support points of view with which you, an advocate of Aesthetic Realism, do not agree. I think you should feel free to add the (usually logorrheic) explanations that Aesthetic Realists prefer, but you'd be better off leaving the explanations of your opponents (e.g., gay men) alone. - Outerlimits (talk) 06:46, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think you understood the reason for the revision in the lede.  It is simply an update, pointing to [the current] "A Note on Aesthetic Realism and Homosexuality" on the Aesthetic Realism Foundation website. LoreMariano (talk) 15:15, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: I have modified the lead a bit for clarity and placed some of the detailed explanations there under the Philosophy section. I hope the edit improved the introduction. I have also added some info and their corresponding sources. Feel free to modify the changes made to improve the article further. If you have a question, please send me a message. Thanks. Darwin Naz (talk) 23:54, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:Bishop of Aberdeen

message: According to the article on the Diocese of Aberdeen, there was a time of no Catholic bishop, and the list includes bishops during this supposed time of no bishop.  Does this mean that they are Episcopal bishops?  If so, should some diffrentiation be made, or at least a mention of when the Episcopal Church disenfranchized the Catholics there in addition to the restoration in the 1800s?
Furthermore, the Bishop Ronald MacDonald is linked to a Scotish-American... I am guessing not the bishop intended.
CJJDay 21:52, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reformation 
Talk:George Boolos

message: The following was presented by Boolos in the Harvard Review of Philosophy, 1996.
 Three Gods, A B and C, are called, in some order, True
 False and Random. True always speaks truly, False
 always speaks falsely, but whether Random speaks truly
 or falsely is a completely random matter. Your task is
 to determine the identities of A, B and C by asking
 three yes-no questions; each question must be put to
 exactly one God. The Gods understand English, but will
 answer all questions in their own language, in which
 the words for 'yes' and 'no' are 'da' and 'ja', in some
 order. You do not know which word means which.
Now can anyone figure out the answer?  (c;If anyone needs a hint, let me know on my talk page.- Eric Herboso  03:36, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: also available in Logic, Logic, and Logic, in case anyone finds it easier to looks for it there, under the title, "The Hardest Logic Problem in the World." The puzzle itself is credited to Raymond Smullyan, if I am not mistaken.  (For the record, I don't think it's the hardest logic problem in the world, though it is a pretty good one.  And yes, I did solve it myself.  That strikes me as the best evidence that it's no that difficult: I'm just not that smart.) Captain Wacky 07:13, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the article, the 3rd paragraph of the section Work mentions Boolos' work on Frege's Grundgesetze and the influence of Russell's paradox on it. At the end, the sentence "The resulting system [Frege Arithmetic, i.e., Frege's logic of Grundgesetze with Basic Law V replaced with Hume's Principle] has since been the subject of intense work" has the tag . Would a reference to, for instance, Richard Heck's book Frege's Theorem (Book info // list of Heck's publications) — which discusses Frege Arithmetic almost exclusively — be considered as a suitable citation? YuujiSajaki (talk) 11:33, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frege's Basic Law V
Talk:Golden algae

message: Golden alga → Golden algae … Rationale: common plural is better than uncommon singular; match other algae pages. Blocked by minor edit history at Golden algae. … Please share your opinion at Talk:Golden alga. --R. S. Shaw 21:43, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support We should match the other algae pages. Evertype 15:43, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Moved. —Nightstallion (?) 11:40, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support We should match the other algae pages. Evertype 15:43, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved. —Nightstallion (?) 11:40, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: The page currently has *9* separate taxonomies, going back to the year 1914. This feels like a lot of unnecessary information for this page and would be a better fit for Wikispecies. Can we migrate most of these taxonomies there and decide on a single one to stick to, at least within the page and then refer to wikispecies for more detailed taxonomic analyses?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daemyth (talk • contribs) 02:17, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does the extensive history of taxonomy really belong here?
Talk:Malinois dog

message: I deleted the sections Aggressiveness, Speed and Training because none of them were sourced, and the first two were contentious. Reliable sources regarding the breed covering any of these points, or disagreements about these points, would be welcome. Simply stating, "It's a mean breed!" or "I own Malinois and they're the sweetest dogs in the world!" does not work.  Thundersnow  07:26, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aggressiveness, Speed and Training sections 

message: The Drudge Report this morning Sep 1 2016 has a linked story about a 10-month-old Belgian Malinois: "Overboard in lake, dog swims 6 miles, walks 12 more to find family..." which goes to an Associated Press story dated Aug 31 2016. Because it's on Drudge, it will receive wide international coverage by news organizations, so I want to note it here in case the story, possibly with follow-up coverage, qualifies the dog as being notable for this Wikipedia article. This is my first and only visit here, so I will leave this to regular editors to monitor this and make a decision. 5Q5 (talk) 11:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New notable addition candidate 

message: Please see discussion at Talk:Belgian Shepherd#Possible merger with variety pages. Cavalryman (talk) 04:44, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible merger to [[Belgian Shepherd]]
Talk:People's Party (Utah)

message: A sentence in the third paragraph, "With organized opposition to LDS candidates, .", seems to be missing its second half. MK2 04:20, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dale Earnhardt

message: Hi. I'm probably thinking about getting this article to GA or FA status with the intention of featuring it as a TFA on February 18, 2016 (the 15th anniversary of Earnhardt's death) and April 29, 2016 (what would have been his 70th birthday). Here are a few things we need to look at.
*The lead section should be a summary of his whole life, and legacy.
*The NASCAR career section may need to be trimmed and shoehorned into the biography section. His early life and personal life can be separated into it as well.
*We also need to summarize the death section and aftermath as well too, but leave in important information as well (the rest of it is covered in the main article, Death of Dale Earnhardt, which I also plan to take it to GA sometime soon).
Any thoughts or ideas on how to improve the article would be appreciated. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 23:00, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: We'd probably have to start making a push now if we wanted a TFA February 18. At first glance, it seems like there's some trivial fancruft that could be removed, and maybe some of the headers under the NASCAR career section could be merged. I took up Sam Hornish, Jr. for a GA push in August, and after getting looked at by the GoCE, it's waiting for a review at GAN. It's also probably in the best shape of any NASCAR biography, so perhaps it could be used as a point of reference (of course, Hornish doesn't have the same notability level as Earnhardt, but regardless...). --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 17:50, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

text: Also,  Would you mind double-checking the results tables and making sure they are all sourced and accurate? Thanks, --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 17:52, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yep no problem. I'll ping you once I double-checked all results. Jahn1234567890 (talk) 10:50, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA/FA Push? 

message: Section "Aftermath":
"Childress, who holds the rights from NASCAR to the No.3"
Section "No. 3 car":
"A common misconception is that Richard Childress Racing "owns the rights" to the No. 3 in NASCAR competition (fueled by the fact that Kevin Harvick's car has a little No. 3 as an homage to Earnhardt and the usage of the No. 3 on the Camping World Series truck of Ty Dillon), but in fact no team owns the rights to this or any other number."
I don't know which if either is right, but one of you who does might find one or both of those to be in error and needing an edit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.27.72.99 (talk) 05:01, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction on ownership of "No. 3" ? 
Talk:Gay skinhead

message: This page was listed on votes for deletion.  Please see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Gay skinheads for the results of the debate. -- AllyUnion (talk) 04:41, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Votes for deletion results 

message: I think the caption of the current photo which references "one with a devil-like tattoo" could be improved.  Does anybody know which deity and which culture or religion the tattoo represents? Centerone (talk) 07:05, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That tattoo is irrelevant to the topic of the article, so I deleted that detail from the caption.Spylab (talk) 03:17, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo Caption/Diety 

message: Is this even a thing? And what did anyone think was its relevance to gay skinheads? I would suggest that most skinheads, never mind their sexuality, would not touch hip hop of any variety with a ten-foot pole.
Nuttyskin (talk) 01:38, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  LGBT hip hop? 
Talk:Wolf O'Donnell

message: Where does this information come from?
I'm confused >_>;
--Phred Levi 04:53, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Information

message: What is Wolf's official age by the time of Star Fox Assault? The Star Wolf team page says 28, but this page says 30. What is the official age, if any? PlatformerMastah 04:16, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I dunno. Its quite amusing, actually. Like every day it changes back and forth. I'll go and look to find an official source. Thunderbrand 04:55, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

text: My SF64 Player's Guide says nothing about his age. DZComposer 04:08, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wolf's Age

message: Anyone got a link to this webpage he/she mentions? I can't find anything about Wolf being in the Cornerian Navy. A lot of weasel words too. DZComposer 04:04, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh...I never even noticed that. This, like the Star Wolf page, is slowly being re-written by anons and weirdos. Thunderbrand 04:06, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've taken out the disputed information until we can find some sources. I found the Japanese site for  Assault , but unlike the SFA one, it doesn't have any character's age in numerical form. Anyone want to translate? Robert 00:08, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried google translator, Alta vista babel fish, and another one. They didn't work. Might as well leave it out until there is somewhere official that lists it. Thunderbrand 03:46, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First Paragraph

message: It is mentioned that wolf can be unlocked as a playable character, but not the game where this is possible. I assume it's start fox assualt, but I'm not about to make that change. Can someone who knows for sure change that? --Thaddius 14:20, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a little clean-up and fixed the trivia. It read more like an FAQ. Thunderbrand 15:30, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: trivia

message: I tried to change the current image for this one but I had some trouble with the copyright. (I have no idea how to  operate it)
So, if a experienced Wikipedia user could handle it, I would be really thankful, if not, well...tough luck.
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.211.156.220 (talk • contribs) 
:Not to sound picky, but is that image really needed? It is Wolf's same art style as seen in Assault, as there already is an Assault image of him in the article. Also, that one is a lot smaller than the current one.He does look like Fox McCloud. Thunderbrand 17:58, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: Why was this page created? Unfortunately, it seems that the only reception that this great character gets is negative, due to his personality and inclusion in Brawl. It's almost as if this page was created to push an agenda. (66.116.9.64 (talk) 21:37, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: There is zero information about the game and Wolf having been confirmed by Platinum Games. Obviously once more information is available it can be expanded further.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shane3x (talk • contribs) 06:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Star Fox Zero
Talk:Creation biology/Archive 2

message: we want to avoid duplication between Wikiquote and Wikipedia if we can. Nanobug
::Since this is obviously possible in this case, that's the way it goes. Joshuaschroeder 00:34, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of quotes

message: I know that Ungtss thinks I "know nothing about the subject", but this is just plain false. I am trying to edit and write to the best of my NPOV ability (which ungtss doesn't believe I possess, but no matter). I don't mind him adding his own edits, but his knee-jerk reverts do nothing. Joshuaschroeder
I think we could certainly do with some restraint in such respects (and more besides);  I'm still quibbling with U's edits of my text comparing kinds and clades, and meanwhile, we've had numerous subsequent edits, and reverts, all in a rush.  Can I suggest we break out small sections one at a time, try and deal with the 'issues' in those, before either a) moving on to another topic, or b) adding outright new material?  (At least on a trilateral basis, can't speak for anyone else, obviously.)  And please (and Ungtss, I've asked you this before):  Always fill the summary field.  Furthermore, 'However, edit summaries are not the place to carry on debates or negotiation over the content.'  (Slightly further down the same section.)  Alai 05:24, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Restoring my edit

message: i think it would be a good idea to focus our efforts on the "biological kinds" section -- since it's the heart of CB, let's try + get it sharpened up, then move on, eh?  further, to avoid stupid edit wars, let's ask questions and propose changes IN FULL, and HERE FIRST, so we can come to consensus and not have to revert edits wholesale.  it's giving me carpal tunnel.  Ungtss 14:39, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: For starters, I think you really, really really need to tighten up the (growing) list of possible kinds.  You cite no supporting references, which is why I made the comment about you apparently making them up as you went along.  (I'm sure you're not, but you need to show sources for this stuff.  The article you mentioned on the talk page was a start, but it does not give these example kinds.)  Frankly, the idea of an order as a kind on a several thousand years scale, is beyond problematic in genetic terms, but the article throws these things out as if it's no big deal.  Alai 17:07, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

text: this link lists dogs, cats, bears, and horses.  the other one listed alligators.  this one lists tigons + wholphins].  obviously the research hasn't been done yet, but the page notes that -- what else are you looking for?  Ungtss 18:57, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks.  I missed the one on crocodilia, it's mentioned very much in passing and tentatively.  These should be attributed in the text;  last thing I want is any suggestion these are straw men put up by 'anti-creationists'.  Alai 22:40, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  per alai's suggestion