Talk:Bill de Blasio

message: I was just curious to get a sense of consensus for the lead image. I found some possible replacements. Just leaving it out there:
File:Bill de Blasio 11-2-2013.jpg|Option A (current)
File:Bill de Blasio 2014.jpg|Option B
File:Mayor Bill de Blasio 2016.jpg|Option C
--TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 08:21, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead Image 

message: The link says "the tallest mayor in New York’s modern history".  The cynic in me suspects laziness on the part of mr Grynbaum; in any case, that's all that's supported by this reference. Art. should have the word "modern" inserted. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 01:06, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "tallest mayor in NY history" 

message: Now that it's confirmed that William Jr. is son of a Communist Party member, should that be included in his early life section? 173.15.73.108 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 22:15, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Cite a reliable source. If it can be shown to be a fact, then fine. If it's a lie or a rumor, fuhgeddaboudit. -- ℜob C. alias ALAROB 18:58, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Father Communist Party

message: Somebody out there thinks the honorific for the mayor of New York is spelled the British way, "His Honour". Could be. But my search turned up more hits for calling the NYC mayor "His Honor," including 
* a 1900 New York Times headline 
* and the title of a 1906 Broadway musical, His Honor the Mayor. 
Older Times headlines (like this one from 1862) spell it "His Honour," and Jimmy Durante (fl. 1920s-60s) had a song that spells it that way in the sheet music ("His Honour the Mayor"). But I suspect the Durante case is one where the spelling was deliberately antiquated for effect. -- ℜob C. alias ALAROB 19:11, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "His Honor" or "His Honour" 

message: Little to no content about a campaign that went nowhere and is over now. pbp 14:08, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Howdy, I am working on an expansion for the article. Despite his low polling, Bill de Blasio was certainly a major candidate. Any run by a mayor of NYC is notable enough to deserve its own article and every other campaign by such a candidate in the last 3 elections (no matter how brief/unsuccessful) has its own article. It seems to me the issue is much more so that the article hasn't been worked on rather than there shouldn't be an article. PrairieKid (talk) 14:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I support a merge, but I am willing to wait to see if PrairieKid can develop a really good article about de Blasio's campaign, in which case I'll quite possibly change my mind. --Comment by  Selfie City (talk about my contributions) 20:42, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

text: Support. Not every aborted presidential campaign needs its own Wikipedia page. SunCrow (talk) 04:16, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Bill de Blasio 2020 presidential campaign]] 

message: For what it's worth, I believe that de Blasio's often-turbulent working relationship with New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo is worth its own section. SunCrow (talk) 17:17, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Cuomo section

message: "American politician serving as the 109th mayor of New York City since 2014" => "American politician serving since 2014 as the 109th mayor of New York City"
Nobody's going to presume that New York has had 109 mayors since 2014 but it still reads awkwardly. 93.136.140.11 (talk) 01:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: . ◢  Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 01:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 January 2021 

message: First sentence in article incorrectly claims he's a lawyer. Don't know where this came from.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.125.130.207 (talk) 11:31, April 15, 2021 (UTC)
:You are correct. I've removed that. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:47, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a Lawyer 

message: I see no mention in the article of his not running for a third term with the New York Times not even mentioning his name in recent articles about the upcoming election. What are the circumstances of this decision? As I recall there are no term limits on those who serve as NYC mayor.
:Mayors are limited to two terms. pburka (talk) 17:59, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Because not everyone around the world happens to know this information, a simple statement amounting to "de Blasio did not run in the 2021 New York City mayoral election because, by law (or tradition?), New York mayors are limited to two terms" would be very helpful to add to the article. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 00:44, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  2021 Election 

message: For about a full year now. We No longer show the successor in the infobox of politicians, between election & inauguration. So, Please stop showing Adams. GoodDay (talk) 08:22, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: It seems to me that there are some topics that deserve coverage in this article that are either not mentioned or are not covered in sufficient depth.
First, there is no mention of the campaign finance-related allegations that have dogged de Blasio throughout his tenure. This is a major omission. Please see:
2016:
De Blasio Team Violated Campaign Finance Laws, Report Says
A Beginner's Guide to the Many Investigations Involving Mayor Bill de Blasio
Campaign Finance Board Rules In Mayor’s Favor While Criticizing Him 
2017:
New York mayor Bill de Blasio faces grilling over alleged fundraising scandal
2019:
Nonprofit files complaint alleging de Blasio may have violated campaign finance rules
De Blasio’s history of campaign finance scandals
2020:
De Blasio’s NYC campaign account hit with $16K fine by regulator
2021:
De Blasio Fought for 2 Years to Keep Ethics Warning Secret. Here’s Why.
De Blasio's Years-Old Ethics Violations Are Once Again Under Scrutiny. But Will It Matter?
Second, the section on de Blasio's presidential campaign mentions that de Blasio did not reimburse the city for the costs of his NYPD security detail during the campaign. It does not mention that the Department of Investigations found that he had (according to Politico) "misused his security detail to assist his ill-fated presidential campaign and ferry his children around". This should be included in the article. See , , , , , and .
Third, there is no mention of de Blasio's past support of the Sandanistas. See , , , , , and . 
74.67.6.88 (talk) 20:38, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You're more likely to get changes made to an article if you propose specific text rather than asking other editors to write about the topics you're interested in. See WP:EDITREQ for more information about making edit requests. Or create an account and edit the page directly. pburka (talk) 20:59, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing material 

message: There has been an extreme amount of coverage, including by the international press, on the de Blasio's pizza controversy. It certainly warrants inclusion.
:Thank you for providing a list of references demonstrating coverage. While the content itself may be a bit frivolous, it should be fine for inclusion assuming that undue attention isn't given to the event. Dobbyelf62 (talk) 13:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pizza controversy section 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:De Blasio (surname) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 09:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress