lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bernard Faÿ

message: "1946, a French court condemned him to dégradation nationale and forced labour for life, but the historian managed to escape to Switzerland five years later, funding to facilitate his prison breakout coming from Gertrude Stein." So the escape would have occurred in 1951. Gertrude Stein died on July 27, 1946. The following is from the Wiki entry on Stein, "When Faÿ was sentenced to hard labor for life after the war, Gertrude and Alice campaigned for his release. Several years later, Alice would contribute money to Faÿ's escape from prison." [emphasis added] Dick Kimball (talk) 18:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Escape from Prison 
Talk:Daya (Sikhism)

message: Daya as a name: 
-- 83.236.99.63 (talk) 12:02, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!  16:37, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Dera Baba Nanak

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://derababananak.com/chohlasahib_derababananak.htm). Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Happy days, LindsayHello 09:45, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Cold War Commander

message: This article, like the related BlitzkriegCommander article, have both been written by the writer of the rules (Pete-the-wargamer), and owner of the company that publishes them. Both articles are in clear violation of POV guidelines, and are nothing more than adverts for the game. 
Have attempted to clean up this article, as I have the related one, but at this time would nominate the article for deletion based on the POV & advert violations.
A tag has been placed on :Template:Db-spam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. 
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 70.162.234.178 07:26, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV/Advertisement
Talk:George Weston Limited

message: Oroweat doesn't seem to be owned by George Weston, but rather by Grupo Bimbo.  But there appears to be some commonality between Oroweat products and George Weston's Arnold products.  Anyone have the story?
66.91.254.67 02:11, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is T&T listed as owned by George and Weston? They are owned by Loblaw.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AFanCorp (talk • contribs) 07:12, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  T&T 

message: With the upcoming sale of Weston Foods (ie. Weston Bakery), one article won't do anymore.  George Weston Limited will be for the remaining assets (Loblaw Companies and Choice Properties) and Weston Foods will be for the bakery-related content. 162.208.168.92 (talk) 14:48, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the bakery business is now going its own way, and if the deal goes through it makes sense to me that a new article should cover the new entity with some of its history as part of George Weston repeated.  My Gussie (talk) 01:08, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It was announced that the assets of Weston Foods are being sold to more than one buyer. Since those assets are being dispersed and there will no longer be one separate entity that can be identified as the continuation of Weston Foods, then I don't feel that a separate article is required. -- Blairall (talk) 19:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed that this article should be updated to reflect the final fate of the bakery business.  New articles could be created for the newly expanded companies (FGF Brands and Hearthside Food Solutions) that between them acquired the the Weston Foods business.My Gussie (talk) 08:22, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting proposal 

message: What happened to old mill bread in regina sask.     Why is it no longer available  at superstore in regina. 207.47.147.152 (talk) 15:29, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old mill
Talk:Electoral division of Greatorex

message: Hi guys, the seat of Greatorex was abolished earlier this year with electoral redistributions, can ths please be checked?
http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2015/09/northern-territory-electoral-boundaries-finalised.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.45.116.104 (talk) 07:24, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This will not come into effect until the Legislative Assembly is dissolved. Can definitely be mentioned though - will add that. Frickeg (talk) 09:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Sharkrunners

message: To Do:
1) Add in shark's info (serial #, length, weight, activity, etc)
2) Add in dive techniques with data available, # of divers, hazard risk, quality of data, equipment needed
3) Add equipment, cost, benefits/dive techinques allowed
4) Reseach orgs - differences, goals, etc
5) Achievements - what, how, how much you earn (different for different orgs?)
6) Future of Sharkrunners (how long, more sharks?, more territory?)
7) Explain what a duel is and how to win one  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.137.9.122 (talk) 17:42, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Govind

message: Pls note that Govind is the name of Lord Vishnu originally. It is 187th name of Lord Vishnu in Vishnu Sahasranama of Mahabharata.
182.71.183.195 (talk) 08:28, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: redirects to Vishnu; Vishnu sahasranama of Mahabharata ("the thousand names of Vishnu") is a list of 1,000 names of Vishnu. Are you saying that Govind is one of these 1,000 names? I also note that Govinda (disambiguation) is also a disambiguation for Govind. I suppose that Govinda is another of the 1,000 names. Can you request or suggest a specific change to the Govind (disambiguation)? This page doesn't seem to conform to MOS:DAB. Generally dabs don't have references. – Wbm1058 (talk) 13:44, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ; not enough information supplied.--Launchballer 17:47, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 14 March 2013
Talk:Gurdwara Rakab Ganj Sahib

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 03:40, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: Dear Sir/Madam,
I will obliged if you can provide above information. The information is needed for creating a website and as well as a book on this historical Gurudwara.
Kindest regards
Harvinder Sekhon  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.240.32.99 (talk) 16:28, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking for Information, artifacts, photographs, historical information, records pertaining to Gurudwara Rakab Ganj Sahib
Talk:Gurdwara Sis Ganj Sahib

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 03:40, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: The lead paragraph of this article states: "Situated in Chandni Chowk in Old Delhi, it marks the site where the ninth Sikh Guru was beheaded on the orders of the Mughal emperor Aurangzeb on 11 November 1675 for saving Kashmiri pandits who refusing to convert to Islam."
However, if one makes the tiniest effort of glancing through the article Guru Tegh Bahadur, they'd understand that the reason(s) for the execution of "Guru Tegh Bahadur" is contested. However, this article, in its current form, mentions only the version carried in "meta-narratives" and makes no mention of other versions. This, in my humble opinion, is a violation of Wikipedia's NPOV principle. I'd appreciate if other editors could look into this and share their thoughts. --Indianite (talk) 22:58, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The reference to Kashmiri Pandits have been deleted. Please remove the NPOV dispute. Surjit Singh (talk) 03:28, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV dispute
Talk:List of Gurdwaras in Oceania

message: I removed the numbers from the victorian part to make it the same as the rest, here they are if somebody thinks they should be reinstated.
I also think there might be a gurdwara near murwullimbah but am not sure of the address.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghoongta (talk • contribs) 09:39, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And i removed the numbers from this talk page. we are not a directory. phone numbers are NEVER used on WP, unless they are notable, like 911 in the US, or 687-5309Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:23, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phone Numbers 

message: I came across many gurdwaras i could not verify existed. These include:
*Bangalow Sikh Gurdwara
*Gordonvale Sikh Gurdwara
*Tully Sikh Gurdwara
*Enfield Sikh Gurdwara
*Nelson Sikh Gurdwara  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghoongta (talk • contribs) 14:53, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unverified Gurdwaras 

message: The article currently lists 18 entries for New Zealand and virtually all of them are unsourced. The same situation applies for the other countries. If an editor has a list of Gurdwaras, please provide sources urgently. Akld guy (talk) 02:15, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced entries
Talk:The Yellow and The Green

message: Hunter, William C. Beacon Across the Prairie: North Dakota's Land-Grant College. Fargo: Institute for Regional Studies, 1961.
Clarence S. Putnam Manuscript Collection, NDSU Institute for Regional Studies, NDSU Libraries.
I have read through parts of them --NDState 05:09, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Guru Nanak Gurpurab

message: While this article is already tagged, I felt it might be helpful for editors to have some explaination of the problems other editors see with it. There was some discussions Talk:Main Page/Archive 146#Guru Nanak Jayanti: 2 Nov : On this day... and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sikhism#Guru Nanak Jayanti. As I mentioned in the second link, I would welcome editors improving this article so that it can be featued on SA/OTD in the future Nil Einne (talk) 11:11, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I am confused which one is the real day, November 2 (as said in Nanakshahi calendar) or Kartika Purnima (full moon or 15th day of Kartika, which can fall differently each year). Please clarify this.--Rochelimit (talk) 21:16, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems 

message: The name of the article should be Guru Nanak Gurpurab because in  Sikhism it's known as Gurpurab not Jayanti, it is most suitable and Officially too. The other reason is being Jayanti word is used for Hindu festivals not for  Sikh fesitivals. Gurpurab is most commonly and officialy used in Sikh religion. 
Theman244 (talk) 02:09, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guru Nanak Gurpurab 

message: If the Nanakshahi calendar maps to the same Gregorian dates each year, why does this festival held on a different date each year? I'm sure it's a fairly simple explanation, but that's missing from the article. Thanks. —howcheng  {chat} 07:18, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this on different dates every year? 
Talk:Real socialism

message: As has been said above, the relevant policy is WP:NPOV.  This is obviously not NPOV. 91.108.22.161 (talk) 01:44, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: If you're not going to explain what you think is wrong with it, it's mighty hard for anyone else to doing anything about it. Rd232 talk
Please explain this edit. This is notable according to cited book. Do you want more direct quotation? There is no other way to prove notability except citing a reliable source (an academic book in this case) that claims something to be notable.Biophys (talk) 20:37, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

text: Note the title of the book I quoted: "A Short Encyclopedia of Real Socialism".Biophys (talk) 20:39, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: While the fact that "real socialism" was subject of many political jokes is notable, specific examples of jokes are not. There is no evidence of widespread use or lasting importance of this specific jokes.DonaldDuck (talk) 05:13, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:Notability guidelines are about creating articles, not about the content. The relevant policy here is WP:NPOV. It requires all significant views on the subject (and sourced to WP:RS) to be fairly represented. I included one of the views, as described in a book. You can include others.Biophys (talk) 14:27, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Quoting notable political jokes is no different from any other quoting in WP articles. If Sarnov used examples of political jokes, songs, poetry  and other folklore to illustrate his points in the books, we can quote him. No problem.Biophys (talk) 15:34, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Relevant policy here is WP:UNDUE. There is no evidence of importance of this particular jokes. Wikipedia is encyclopedia, not collection of jokes. DonaldDuck (talk) 02:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's not collection of jokes. Hence I quote the book named "...Real socialism".Biophys (talk) 05:19, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Talk:WebGUI

message: I object to the deletion of this page.  It may need to be edited, but should not be deleted.
From the wikipedia deletion page: "Pages that can be improved should be edited or tagged, not nominated for deletion".  Rather than tagging this page for deletion, just tell the creator that it needs edits.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.110.101 (talk • contribs) 
Definitely KEEP this article: WebGUI is an interesting CMS/framework. Actually, I do not understand why this article's notability is disputed. It is one of maybe a dozen interesting Open Source CMSystems (out of many more). Can someone explain, please? -- Zapyon (talk) 14:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

message: Recently, an IP editor (90.174.2.110) has been removing content due to it being "unsourced". While I agree that it was poorly sourced, content should be kept and improved rather than removed. After I added 3 sources, the IP editor decided that, since they were not independent sources, they should not be used. However, the policy on self-published sources states that "Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, usually in articles about themselves or their activities, without the self-published source requirement that they be published experts in the field, so long as" they meet a number of requirements, which I believe are met in this situation. Accordingly, I propose that the content by kept in the article, and that efforts be made to find better sources, but that until any are located, the self-published sources be used. Thoughts?
--DannyS712 (talk) 20:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: 10 years is enough time to wait to provide independent sources. We kept the content while we waited for the independent sources. Now it is time to remove the content and wait you to provide any content backed with independent sources. If there are no independent sources, the content cannot be kept and the page is not notable enough to be kept in Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.174.2.80 (talk • contribs) 16:53, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: IP address has been dealt with at WP:ANI. – The Grid (talk)  22:39, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you! --DannyS712 (talk) 23:12, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Content
Talk:Jassa Singh Ramgarhia

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.sikh-history.com/sikhhist/warriors/ramgarhia.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 18:42, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Ethnography of communication

message: There are a lot of examples of research that uses ethnography of communication, but none of them are explained. It would be helpful to include the significance and implications of these studies so the readers can see how the ethnography of communication can be used to study people and their social and cultural practices/beliefs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmai1026 (talk • contribs) 18:56, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Studies Examples 

message: I think at the beginning of the page, the definition of the Ethnography of communication, needs more references. Although it is detailed and clear enough to make a definition, I don't know where does the definition come from, is it abstracted from some books or scholar works? More references can be more reliable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clairechen0804 (talk • contribs) 21:27, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  more references for definition 

message: In my opinion, the notable studies section should be expanded more. Furthermore, new sections need to be created.  S-P-E-A-K-I-N-G model by Hymes or Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis needs to be explained. The definition is very concrete and clear but citation should be improved.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssopark (talk • contribs) 18:57, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable studies should be expanded
Talk:Legal remedy

message: I took a look at the German page and also one other (I don't remember which) using Google translate and they seem to be talking about appeals, not legal remedies. Does anybody check these links? --TachyonJack (talk) 22:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  are the linked language pages really the same thing? 

message: The maxim 'for every right, there is a remedy; where there is no remedy, there is no right', at least the essence of it, actually predates Blackstone - in 1703 Holt CJ stated wherever there is a right a remedy must be found in Ashby v White (1703) KB at 953, so maybe the idea should be attributed to him?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.76.7.218 (talk) 16:07, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Maxim

message: There was a globalize template on the article, in the section on American remedies, not the top of the article. I removed it. The introduction seems to apply to any country that uses common law. When there is a separate section for a particular country and nothing stopping editors from adding additional sections for other countries, which I encourage, how does the globalize template apply? I do not know the intent of the person who placed the template, but in my opinion, a lack of information is not necessarily a case of bias. This is my opinion on how the globalize template should be used and may not be the consensus. -- Kjkolb (talk) 17:58, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't want to wade in on the use of templates, but I'd note that the so-called American remedies discussed in the section previously named Legal Remedies in American law are identical with the remedies available at common law; certainly in Canada, and I suspect in other Commonwealth jurisdictions. I've changed American to Common Law for that reason. -- PatrickR (talk) 00:00, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of globalize template

message: A legal remedy, also referred to as judicial relief or a judicial remedy, is the means with which a court of law, usually in the exercise of civil law jurisdiction, enforces a right, imposes a penalty, or makes another court order to impose its will in order to compensate for the harm of a wrongful act inflicted upon an individual.[1] 2407:5200:400:662F:BD68:3AC9:76FA:BC76 (talk) 04:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Law of remedy
Talk:Bole So Nihal

message: I have tagged this article for cleanup. It is currently a wreck --Maurice45 (talk) 16:35, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Mukta is usually transliterated 'a' and Kanna as 'aa'.  The title and other parts appear to be transliterated incorrectly.  I am beginner with Punjabi and am hesitant to make the changes especially changing the title of the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DennisStork (talk • contribs) 06:42, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transliteration