lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:2007 deaths

message: Saddam Husain and His Brother in Law "Chemical Ali" are not on this list
Saddam Hussein was executed on 30 December 2006, Ali Hassan al-Majid (a.k.a. Chemical Ali0 is still alive. Samuel 15:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saddam Husain and His Brother in Law "Chemical Ali"
Talk:FitzHugh–Nagumo model

message: I transferred the German FitzHugh article
to the English wiki, however it is still a stub.
In particular the spike dynamics should
be explained in terms of the nullclines.
Please help to make it grow!
--Benjamin.friedrich 10:17, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transferred 

message: There is an WikiScholar article to FHN —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Benjamin.friedrich (talk • contribs) 10:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiScholar article 

message: The article links to an online Java app, which however seems broken for me - can somebody confirm?
https://thevirtualheart.org/FHNindex.html Benjamin.friedrich (talk) 10:48, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Java apps broken?
Talk:Moa-class patrol boat

message: Different parts of this article seem to provide different numbers of ships. Can someone who knows more about this topic please correct the article so the number of Moa's is made clear? I assume its five, but the article seems to suggest that 6 were ordered and 4 entered service as patrol boats so its a bit confusing. --Nick Dowling 10:21, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of ships

message: The Moa Class IPC's were operated by the reserves and never did regular patrols as such they only did the odd patrol of their area of influence as well as training for the reservists. The Protector-class which is more commonly known as the Lake Class IPV's were replacing the older Lake Class IPC's of the same names and pennant numbers. The reserve vessels were never replaced.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.94.38.207 (talk) 22:08, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Succeeded by:	Protector-class IPV
File talk:F@H FLOPS per client.svg

message: OOC, aren't these GigaFLOPS ?
Not only that, but what kind of sense does "Values in MegaFLOPS [Mega Floating Point Operations Per Second] Per Day" make? It should be "Values in GigaFLOP per day", maybe with a lower case s after GigaFLOP.
--Sprelux 18:51, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Weaveworld

message: The article needs some coverage of the critical reception of the book. There seems to me no mention of good or bad assessments of the book's worth. 121.127.207.185 (talk) 04:30, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical Response 

message: Wasn't there also a character in this novel called "The Rake" which Immocolata used to attack the good guys? I think he was some kind of ripped-open guy who would try to rip you open? Dictabeard (talk) 07:11, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The Rake?

message: Right: the section on characters talks about a minor character called Balm de Bono, who’s described as a rope dancer.
The link for rope dancer goes to the Wikipedia entry about Russian singer, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valery_Leontiev">Valery Leontiev</a>.
I don’t know if there’s a Wiki page about rope dancing — a quick search says not — but can someone remove the Leontiev link, please?
As things stand, it has no relevance to the article.
Cuddy2977 (talk) 08:45, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a piped link to aerial dance. It's been a while since I rethe book and I can't recall whether there's any detail about what de Bono's act consists of, but I assume this is the same thing. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 19:46, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK … But if we got get a link to anything that backs that up?   I’d be happier.   Cheers, though, Dom. Cuddy2977 (talk) 19:31, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rope Dancer 

message: I've removed the entire section "Religious aspects", as it is wholly unsourced and appears to be Original Research. I've pasted it here in case anyone feels like using it as the basis for a properly-sourced section. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 20:04, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research
Talk:The Thief of Always

message: I believe Jive was also a character in this book. Shouldn't he be mentioned? It wasn't just Rictus... Ranze (talk) 23:26, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Jive

message: This article has had a notification of a need for further revisions added.  Breckham101 (talk) 20:38, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion on Rewrite
Talk:New Complexity

message: This article suffers from a largely unencyclopedic style and ta raft of unsourced statements that in the aggregate suggest WP:POV and WP:OR problems. I sugges it be rewritten in a more neutral tone, discounting the internal polemics (noted below). Basically, we need to know what it is, who is associated with it, and its influence and context within the larger world of classical, especially contemporary music. This sounds like it was written by an apologist and that is not what an encyclopedia article should be about. Eusebeus 13:42, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Problems 

message: Can we get permission from Brian Ferneyhough's publisher to reprint a short score excerpt that is extraordinarily complex (rhythmically and otherwise)? Badagnani (talk) 04:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: How about :File:Ferneyhough Etudes Transcendantales measure 1.png under fair use instead? Hyacinth (talk) 12:20, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Need image

message: Everything in it rings true to me, although as others have said above it definitely reads like an insider's account. I've tried to get rid of the most egregious claims in the article, particularly ones that seem impossible to source. I think where it needs to head is more info about how other people use the term and less info about how nobody really knows what it means. A search for album and concert reviews using the term from any number of sources might even help to source some of these claims, particularly about the ensembles and performers. Brian heim composer (talk) 13:54, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thoughts on the current state of this article 

message: Hello! I noticed there was a bit of discussion in on this in one of the other sections already, but it was from several years ago when the article was quite a bit different and also didn't stay much on topic, so I wanted to create a new section to ask this. The information in the second paragraph of the International Spread section is not mentioned in any of the cited sources and when I tried to do research to confirm the information in this paragraph, I found very little (I can't find confirmation that the festival invited those specific composers from North America, for example). Furthermore, I wonder if the information in this paragraph is notable enough to mention since, while the Bludenzer Tage zeitgemäßer Musik is a notable music contemporary festival, it doesn't seem to play an exceptionally significant role in the history of New Complexity. Many scholarly articles on New Complexity mention the  Darmstädter Ferienkurse, for example, but I have yet to find one that mentions Bludenzer Tage. I would edit or delete this section myself, but as I'm pretty new to editing and to the world of New Complexity I wanted to see if anyone with more experience had suggestions in how to improve this before doing so. It seems like at the moment, the secondary sources that do exist are not sufficient to justify the inclusion of this paragraph in its current form.
Thank you!
Gvarab (talk) 19:07, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete or Change Second Paragraph in International Spread?
Talk:Oram's Arbour

message: This link has some good info that could be incorperated.
http://www2.winchester.ac.uk/Archaeology/current%20research/oramsarbour/Background.htm GameKeeper 10:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Before I moved from Winchester some years ago, Oram's Arbour regularly hosted a large public bonfire and fireworks display marking Guy Fawkes night, usually displaced to the nearest weekend when that fell on a weekday, if I remember correctly. Is this still the case, and can references be found to add this to the article? {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 90.201.110.45 (talk) 13:20, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bonfire?
Talk:Nazaré, Portugal

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Nazaré February 2013-12.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on August 9, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-08-09. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:49, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Nazaré February 2013-12.jpg]] to appear as POTD 
Talk:Absolute Midnight

message: Abarat is a wonderful place, especially when Candy Quakenbush is there!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.142.20.134 (talk) 01:41, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Can't Wait!!!!!!!!! 

message: From the Official Clive Barker Website:
"He delivered the full manuscript to his editor in the summer of 2009, but publication delays mean that publication of Abarat 3 may not now be until sometime late in 2011. "  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.189.35.181 (talk) 22:45, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication Date
Talk:Aquinas College, Otago

message: Somebody will make create this page sooner rather than later, so I went ahead and made a short (and not particularly high quality) stub. If I have some time, I'll work on it. Incidentally, if the admin dealing with this chooses to, the page should be moved to Aquinas College, Otago, that following the naming convention for the other colleges of that university. --Limegreen 10:54, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Non copy-vio stub

message: This relates to the originally posted copyrighted material (now contained in article history:
.  Note: this permission only speaks to the text copyright and not to the quality of the article or the notability of its subject.  Bastiq▼e demandez 16:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyrighted information previously contained 

message: I've put in an infobox, as with a number of other colleges, but the motto 'Discendo Sapiento' I can't seem to translate for a suggestion - someone with knowledge of Latin is going to have to take over... Naturally, having it cited would be ideal. The best I can get is that, maybe, Discendo Sapient means "By Learning they will be Wise" (if I understand  correctly) but with the extra 'o' I can't find anything :s
If anyone has colours, please fill them in or let me know and I will. Cheers --Philtweir (talk) 09:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox, motto and colours
Talk:The Scarlet Gospels

message: Can anyone tell me where Harper Collins have said that the release date is December 2008?  Seems unlikely, considering Barker has basically finished writing, and said about 5 months ago that it'd be released 3rd quarter 2007.  Also Amazon already have it on pre-order with a release date of 2nd July.
Snakesamongus 10:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Japanese year number

message: Pre-expand include size: 32670 bytes.--Patrick 11:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Please update  with . Per Wikipedia:Template documentation/List Thankyou. -- ṃ•α•Ł•ṭ•ʰ•Ə•Щ•  @ 06:10, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. – Luna Santin (talk) 08:39, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request
Talk:Fuling jiabing

message: Pinyin please m.e. 11:00, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Nengo

message: Please update  with . Per Wikipedia:Template documentation/List Thankyou. -- ṃ•α•Ł•ṭ•ʰ•Ə•Щ•  @ 06:10, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. – Luna Santin (talk) 08:38, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: This template is incomplete. It doesn't cover eras before 13th centuries. May I make addition? -- Taku (talk) 00:37, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please make the exact edit here on this talk page, and then a administrator can make the change for you. That way there is no need to unprotect and re-protect the template. Tiptoety talk 03:08, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

text: - Looked pretty non-controversial to me. Tiptoety talk 05:33, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. -- Taku (talk) 05:34, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete
Talk:Pen Dinas

message: Rated as Start for Wales Project. Needs pictures and maybe some local knowledge.--Cynnydd 10:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
Location should be 52.40228,-4.08197
—144.124.16.33 (talk) 11:51, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Thanks for providing the correct coordinates. It made it a lot easier for me, for which I'm grateful. By the way, I see here that your IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing and may very well be blocked again in the future. Of course, I'm not presuming that you have anything to do with it but, to avoid being caught up in a future block, I strongly urge you to set up a Wikipedia user account. It'll ensure you'll still be able to edit, as well as offering several otehr advantages. Anyway, thanks again for your help on this page. Happy editing. LordVetinari (talk) 13:50, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinate error
Talk:Waldstätte

message: Strong oppose. Waldstaette are a precise historical entity. Now they lie in Central Switzerland, but historically they are different from Glarus or Zug, other central cantons. Elvetico 11:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Central Switzerland 

message: I found a citation for "Four Forest Cantons," so I am removing the discussion of this topic here from various marginal comments in the article:
* This article needs clarification (or open discussion) on different definitions of Vierwaldstätte. (from cleanup banner)
* Not rather counting Obwalden and Nidwalden as two? (from HTML comment following "Canton of Lucerne" in the discussion of Vierwaldstättersee; the comment was accompanied by a "dubious" sticker—)
Bob Burkhardt (talk) 20:45, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious
Talk:Pompeian Styles

message: Why's there a 'complete rewrite' tag on this page, especially without any discussion having been started? Although the article could be better, I think 'complete rewrite' is going too far. 131.111.8.99 11:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: This is NOT first style. --Accurimbono 12:46, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Image:Pompejanischer Maler um 25 v. Chr. 001.jpg]] 

message: Where is it? Kafka Liz (talk) 20:09, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  And the Fourth Style?
Talk:Dropzone

message: There is a new game ( http://playdropzone.com/ ) with the same name as this game but is unaffiliated. There was already some content (the statue) that is for the new game that was posted on here, and was removed. If you are considering posting content about the new game Dropzone by Sparkpants and Gameforge, know that this page is definitely not the right page and there is currently (as of this posting) no page for that Dropzone. Since it is still in closed beta, it is unclear if it even warrants its own page yet.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wraithan (talk • contribs) 21:10, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dropzone by Sparkypants and Gameforge
Talk:Blackmar Gambit

message: This is my second foray in editing something here, so I would appreciate a couple of days for this to simmer. I may have enough sources and material for this to remain a standalone article.
Having said that, the idea of merging this page with the entry for the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit has some merit, though to be frank, in my opinion the entry for the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit will require a significant overhaul.  -- AlexLane 11:29, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Lotus 23

message: Is this a Lotus 23. The file name hints it's a Lotus 10. // Liftarn
Yes, it appears so.  The 4 stud front Wobbly Webs suggest this is a 23 or a 23B, but the difference between these two models (additional structural steel pipes on the sides of the 23B cockpit) cannot be seen in the photo.  Driver-side-only roll bar made with very thin (probably 1" diameter) pipes were retrofitted to many 23s, but the roll bar shown in the picture is clearly different, and the lack of a windshield wiper shows the extent of the restoration.   Yiba (talk) 01:32, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Talk:T.38 Fax

message: This page is either copyright infringement or spam, as it is a cut and paste from pages and newsletters at Commetrex website , and the external links are are all to different pages of their site.
--pflodo 11:46, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just for everyone's information, I have confirmed that the IP address of the contributor (above), and commetrex.com resolve to the same OrgName in DNS (CBEYOND COMMUNICATIONS, LLC). I don't know if this is sufficient for Wikipedia or not, but I thought I'd put it down. --Kadin2048 03:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Copyvio 

message: It has been recommended that this page be merged with T.38. I concur, and will try to merge some of the information in the next few days, but if anyone else is willing/interested, don't hold back on my account. Personally I think we should merge T.38 Fax into T.38 and leave a redirect on the former, but I'm open to other opinions. --Kadin2048 03:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: The suggestion makes sense.  Now, I believe you nave to enter "T.38 Fax" in order to get to this article.  Seems the Wikepedia search would be much more effective if it returned a listing of all articles with "T.38" in the title, rather than an exact match.  That way, if your're interested in the T.38 jet trainer, and there were an article on it, you could select it rather than one on fax.  
Also, in the "T.38" article the "how T.38 Works" link takes you to a Dialogic manual, rather than "T.38 Fax", which is a better explanation and is a Wikipedia-internal article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.16.220.34 (talk) 14:54, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging T.38 and T.38 Fax 

message: I merged the content with T.38, although I had to remove a few items that were Commetrex specifc. I'll update the article in the next few days
--Bluezy (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merged with T.38
Talk:Console manufacturer

message: *wrong*
"the PlayStation 3 is perhaps the most difficult (and the Wii the easiest) to develop for[citation needed]."
as a developer. I agree that the ps3 is the most difficult (its sdk is poorly documented, for one thing) but in my opinion i find the 360 the easiest to develop for. In fact , its very easy for PC (windows) games to be ported to the 360, than to a console such as the wii.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.16.160.17 (talk) 20:54, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

message: This is original research and opinionated (e.g. about which ones are easiest and hardest to develop for (see point above). Needs complete rewrite. --Stfg (talk) 19:36, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: GOCEreviewed
Talk:Artdink

message: there are now two companys with this name the og Artdink and Studio Artdink which was started by the og but is now owned by another companyNbisbo (talk) 17:30, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Artdink and Studio Artdink
Talk:Monolith Productions

message: does anyone have a summary of the issues with Vivendi regarding the rights to the FEAR franchise? 
Vivendi and monolith split, leaving Vivendi with the name 'FEAR'. the results were that Monolith could create sequels, but not under the name FEAR. hence Project Origin. 3rdTriangle (talk) 17:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Legal issues with Vivendi

message: That's what they call themselves, apparently. Check their website. 68.32.5.81 (talk) 05:09, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monolith games 

message: :GameSpy: How did you decide on your company name?
:Brian L. Goble -- V.P. Distributable Engine Technology: At the time we formed the company, DOS was still the OS of choice for games. Because of this, we knew we had to come up with a name that was 8 characters or less (for 8.3 filenames). We had been researching story and technology ideas for our demo CD and we were watching a lot of movies. "Monolith" came up, was semi mysterious, wasn't taken, and was 8 characters. Perfect.
http://www.gamespy.com/articles/697/697083p12.html
--Mondotta (talk) 20:58, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  name of the company
Talk:Ubisoft Blue Byte

message: This article says Blue Byte made Anno 1503.
The Anno 1503 article (and Max Design article) say Max Design made it.
Well?
63.155.51.223 (talk) 21:29, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It appeared as thuogh it simply listed the entire Anno series, for whatever reason, including the error you mentioned. Blue Byte has only been developing Anno since 2013, also just because the former developer, Related Designs, became part of the company. I removed the offending entries. Lordtobi (✉) 22:07, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attribution Anno 1503
Talk:IO Interactive

message: The article is called "IO Interactive", but the name of the studio is "Io-Interactive". As such, the article should be moved. See the studio's homepage, ioi.dk.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.249.188.153 (talk) 19:21, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, the names "IO Interactive" and "Io-Interactive" were used interchangeably over the years. However, most sources rendered it as "IO Interactive", the current website (as of 2019-07-16) says "IO Interactive", and their legal name has always been "IO Interactive ApS" and later "IO Interactive A/S". Thus, I believe that "IO Interactive" is the correct name for the company and should be used throughout the article. Lordtobi (✉) 05:36, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect studio name 
Talk:Eurocom

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Steve Duckworth. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 14#Steve Duckworth until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 23:54, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Steve Duckworth" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:NetDevil

message: Just ran across this, the page seems a bit marketing-ish.  Also, not sure if a mostly unsuccessful company (now subsidiary) is notable enough for inclusion here, shouldn't the primary owning company be the focus of an article?  Gazillion in this case?  I'm new here so help me out if my understanding is wrong! Cheers Diego Zalea (talk) 11:06, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability? 

message: The section on layoffs states that the Jumpgate development team was laid-off. The press release cited does not say this though. I couldn't find a source online to support this. Sipos0 (talk) 08:15, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layoffs 

message: Connections to the www.NetDevil.com URL are redirected to www.gazillion.com. (Not sure about editing them myself, so just dropping a note about this here.) --MvGulik (talk) 21:48, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  NetDevil URL out of order.
Talk:Asymmetric Publications

message: As of the 15th November 2014, Josh Nite/Mr Skullhead is no longer part of Asymmetric Publications. (Source: forums.kingdomofloathing.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=36 ). --JohnDoe244 (talk) 22:28, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Josh "Mr Skullhead" Nite is no longer running Asymmetric Publications