lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Romance verbs

message: What has been started here with the -ÁRE verbs is great. It would be very good if this page could also show examples of the other 3 Latin conjugations (-ÉRE, -ERE, -ÍRE) and how these developed through into the various Romance languages.  
Petecollier (talk) 16:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Development of the other Latin conjugations

message: "Aimasse" etc. is NOT pluperfect subjunctive in French, but IMPERFECT subjunctive. Pluperfect subjunctive in french is "que j'eusse aimé" etc.. And there's also a past subjunctive in French (whether it qualifies as "perfect" or not is a moot point, to be decided by someone more expert than me). It's formed by present subjunctive of avoir + past participle. The past subjunctive (which unlike the imperfect or pluperfect subjunctive is still very much current and not at all literary), is used according the French rules of sequence and time in a way closely analogous to the use of the Latin perfect subjunctive, a good reason for adding it to the table as "perfect" subjunctive. I.e. it expresses that the action in the subjunctive subordinate clause is anterior to the action described by the main indicative verb, when the indicative verb is a primary tense (but in non-literary French, also for past tenses), i.e. present or future or their variants. Of course the author means that the French imperfect subjunctive is the descendant of the Latin pluperfect subjunctive but nonetheless the table is extremely misleading.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.169.117.168 (talk) 12:48, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's not. The footnotes explain that the meaning has shifted. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 18:17, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: French aimasse

message: I removed the Italian future from the table because the table showed what is the actual descendant of Classical Latin future tense, not the tense that replaced it. In fact also French, Spanish and Portuguese have such a future, but obviously it was not shown in the table [I mean the first table with "amare" verb]. --80.88.175.213 (talk) 11:45, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the topic is Romance verbs, it would be good to show the Romance analytic innovations as well. There are some sticky bits here and there that could be handled with notes; in the table itself the innovations can be marked by text in a color other than black. 47.32.20.133 (talk) 13:53, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Italian future removed

message: 178.138.32.8 (talk) 20:50, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sardinian
Category talk:English-language education

message: I think Wikipedia needs a new category i.e. 
*:Category:English as a foreign or second language
**English language in the Netherlands
**English_language_education_in_Japan
**International Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language
**??Teachers_of_English_to_Speakers_of_Other_Languages??
**Teaching_English_as_a_foreign_language
**and more articles
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Andries (talk • contribs) 07:57, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category structure
Talk:Butler Catholic

message: A tag has been placed on :Butler Catholic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Ctrooper742 (talk) 16:32, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Category talk:American rock music groups

message: Would someone care to move Smash Mouth to the S section and then delete my comment?--208.221.166.2 (talk) 16:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Smash Mouth

message: where's nirvana 98.15.216.208 (talk) 00:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: nirvana?

message: Can you move some of the pages in this too large category page to Category:American rock music groups by state page, please?75.5.246.138 (talk) 18:31, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to the Category:American rock music groups by state page
Talk:James A. Bradley

message: The statement that white tourism in Asbury Park in the 1970's was because of "reintegration" of it's beachfront is false. There was no such "reintegration" in the 1970's as there were no segregation laws or policies that changed in the 1970's. There was only the typical racial discrimination that was practiced all throughout the Jersey Shore at that time. What was unique to Asbury Park in the 1970's was a full scale riot  (and its aftermath) by the substantial Black population that lived on the West Side of Asbury Park. This was the direct cause of Asbury Park losing much of its Tri-State white tourism trade. 
I was there. I lived it. The story of some kind of "reintegration" in the 1970's is not credible.  172.243.229.127 (talk) 17:03, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  False statement in JA Bradley bio
Talk:1961 Thomas Cup

message: The result of the final round was 6-3, but according to smash , Indonesia won 7 matches and Thailand won only 2. Does anybody know where is the mistake? MontanNito (talk) 16:47, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think first double on second day is 17-18, not 18-17, editor do mistake there. --Aleenf1 17:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Challange round
Talk:Cyclopentadienylindium(I)

message: The doi quoted for reference 6,The electronic structure of cyclopentadienylindium, Lin C.S., Tuck D.G., Can. J. Chem., 1982, 60,6, 699–702,  doi = 10.1139/cjc-60-6-699, is incorrect- this came from the Can J Chem Soc site and the problem seems to apply to references for that year. I have notified DOI and will correct it if necessary when they get back--Axiosaurus (talk) 16:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: DOI wrong
File talk:ADSL2 frequencies.png

message: Is this image really right? Surely ADSL2 doesn't use up to 12MHz?
____________
ADSL2+ does use up to 12Mhz, but ADSL1/ADSL2 only uses up to 1.1Mhz.  So the yellow portion may be mislabelled depending on which article it's used in.  It may be better to label it both "ADSL1 and ADSL2" than just "ADSL2", or redesign this image.  Mdrejhon (talk) 18:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Late model

message: This list of Late Models series was deleted. This would make a nice list of regional and statewide Late Model series. I commented on the area that certain series are raced:
*ASA Midwest Tour - Midwest
*ASA Late Model Challenge Series
*ASA Late Model North Series
*ASA Late Model South Series
*ASA Southeast Asphalt Tour
*ACT Late Models
*Wisconsin Challenge Series - Wisconsin
*USAR Hooters Procup Series - nationwide
*Big 8 Series - Wisconsin, Illinois
*Blizzard Series Super Late Models
*Bright House Challenge Series
*CRA Super Series - Midwest
*Georgia Asphalt Series
*Goodyear Challenge Series
*ISCARS Dash Series
*Miller Lite Super Late Model Series
*North State Challenge Series
*Northwest Pro4 Alliance
*PASS North Super Late Models
*PASS South Super Late Models
*PASS National Super Late Model Mini Series
*Rocky Mountain Challenge Series
*Sunbelt Super Late Model Series
*SuperPro Late Model Series
*UARA-STARS
*USPRO Cup Series
-- Royalbroil 02:17, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted redlinks

message: I live in Michigan. There is no Michigan Department of Motor Vehicles. Vehicle registration is managed through the Secretary of State.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.226.183.237 (talk) 02:51, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michigan 

message: This atricle should note that the Late Model dirt racing category also races in Australia   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.184.172.133 (talk) 06:26, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Australia

message: Note the comments already entered regarding the non-existence of Michigan Department of Motor Vehicles. Note also that United States is regarded as NOT a part of North America. Note that "late model race cars" are supposed to be the highest class of racing in Australia, but as an Australian motorsports fan I've never heard of them. Note that "Super Late Models, Late Models, and Limited Late Models" are given as examples of racing classes in this pseudo-category, but as an Australian motorsports fan I have never heard of them, either. Note that references general, regional and national are given  without reference to what continent, region, or nation they are referring to. I propose that this article may be completely or largely fabrication and falsehood. I propose it be deleted completely. This is the sort of article which brings Wikipedia into disrepute.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pijuvwy (talk • contribs) 13:34, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Probably completely fictional pseudo-facts 

message: Instead of just gracing over the super late model in the late model wiki, shouldn't the super late model have its own article, or at least have a subsection dedicated to it? At almost all tracks that race both, they are completely different cars  — Preceding unsigned comment added by FallRiverTyler (talk • contribs) 20:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super late model
Talk:Deerstalker

message: Could obviously be improved by having example photos with flaps up and down, rather than just the hat flat on a table.2.29.92.210 (talk) 17:17, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I know this might sound like a basic question but - Does anyone know why exactly deerstalker hats were worn to stalk deer in? Were they just typical country hats that became synonymous with stalking? Or were they designed for or found to be particularly useful for that purpose or what? This really does seem like the kind of thing that should be on this page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.151.5.171 (talk) 14:05, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. I think it was because, due to the lack of brims on the side, you could handle a rifle or shotgun without knocking off your hat. At the same time your face and the back of your neck got protection.--Jack Upland (talk) 19:24, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why deer stalkers?
Talk:28-hour day

message: Does this mean it's gone mainstream?--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 09:34, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: XKCD is mainstream?  --Hordaland (talk) 13:32, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. 75.101.10.10 (talk) 18:03, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[xkcd]] 

message: An anon, 86.135.218.115, has removed some text (diff) from the article with this edit summary: "removed OR/synthesis, the reference does not even mention 28 hour time".  I've reverted.  I believe that this anon has read neither the reference nor the discussions above. Hope we don't get into edit-warring here; Czeisler's use of the 28-hour day is explained both in the reference and above. - Hordaland (talk) 14:08, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry about that. I used my browser's find function to search the article for "28 hour" but didn't find anything; but I see now it was written as "28-hour". Again, sorry for the mistake. --86.135.218.115 (talk) 18:46, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I just reverted an edit.
Talk:Anatoma regia

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:12, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Scissurella mantelli

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:09, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Mukarram Ahmad

message: In 2008 , an appeal was lodged in the Delhi High court by the mufti demanding satyartha Prakash to be banned. I believe that such important stand should be highlighted in the wiki page . It helps us understand the motivation and attitude of the famous personality and his personal belief. 46.114.209.154 (talk) 14:01, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  High court case against satyartha Prakash’s 

message: In 2008 two Indian Muslims, Usman Ghani and Mohammad Khalil Khan of Sadar Bazar, Delhi, following the fatwa of Mufti Mukarram Ahmed, the Imam of Fatehpuri Masjid in Delhi, urged the Delhi High Court to ban Satyarth Prakash.[16] However, the court dismissed the petition and commented "A suit by Hindus against the Quran or by Muslims against Gita or Satyarth Prakash claiming relief... are in fact, meant to play mischief in the society."[17] 46.114.209.154 (talk) 14:05, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  From the wiki page of Satyartha Prakash
Talk:'Igginbottom

message: I am not sure about the validity of the article's title.  Please the Allmusic piece on the subject here - , which seems to be at some odds with what is presently written in Wikipedia. Unless someone has an alternative source, which better explains the band/album/this article titles ?
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 20:20, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
File talk:Wesnothlich.png

message: Does anybody have a more interesting picture of a lich? This is a bit lackluster.
I was thinking the same thing. Despite the limited importance of this subject, this image really is horrendous. A CG image that could be created by anyone with a half-week's experience with CG programs is hardly appropriate for an article about a popular fantasy creature. Especially not when there is so much excellent art around. Would it at all be possible to use some of the art that has been used for Dungeons and Dragons? I'm not familiar with the intricacies of their licensing, but my understanding was that they were relatively...willing to share? 76.22.6.214 (talk) 03:09, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: DnD art is definitely copyrighted, so it can't be used. But user-generated art (by Wikipedia users) will certainly be welcome. Borisblue (talk) 00:39, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Yogi Bear and the Magical Flight of the Spruce Goose

message: not — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZooPro (talk • contribs) 02:01, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: No need for me to see this movie now - I can work it out from the Plot section!
Surely this could be trimmed down by someone who HAS seen it. The entire plot section is far too long. Ozzieboy (talk) 17:28, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Added long plot template to encourage someone to clean it up. I would do it if I had seen the movie. Ozzieboy (talk) 15:12, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot Overkill

message: The plot summary is far too long, and is filled with tense swapping and unfitting rhetoric. I could understand these misgivings if this was not a well known film, but it is recognizable enough that I feel a better article could be written, particularly the plot section. 2600:4041:4B7:9C00:4C5:C42B:3484:90D2 (talk) 01:09, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is a disaster
Category talk:1930s Polish bomber aircraft

message: Once again we see one of the disadvantages of categories and one of the advantages of topics lists.  The title of this category is incorrect and needs to be changed.  It is
: Polish bomber aircraft 1930-1939
It should be
: Polish bomber aircraft 1930–1939
with a proper ndash instead of a stubby little hyphen.  With a topics list, you'd only need to use the "move" button and then fix redirects.  Maybe I'll be back. Michael Hardy (talk) 14:20, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:David Roberts (swimmer)

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. — 17:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: After a quick scan of Google, I cannot find any reliable source coverage of the subject to verify meeting the Wikipedia:Notability (people) criteria ... Happy Editing! — 72.75.72.63 (talk) 21:46, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROD
Talk:Untranslated region

message: What about merging Five prime untranslated region and Three prime untranslated region into this article? Should result in a better overview. --Sulai (talk) 17:37, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: UTR, in the UK at least, also stands for "Unique Tax Reference". Perhaps a disambiguation page is needed? 08:35, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unique Tax Reference 

message: According to the recently published findings of the ENCODE consortium, about 1.2% of the human genome is protein-coding, while 2.9% is exonic, meaning the 5' and 3' UTRs together make up about 1.7% of the human genome. The image associated with this article shows the UTRs as collectively shorter than the coding sequence, which no longer appears to be accurate.149.76.252.66 (talk) 21:12, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image no longer to scale for human gene 

message: The statement in the introduction, "The importance of these non-coding regions is supported by evolutionary reasoning, as natural selection would have otherwise eliminated this unusable RNA.", needs to either be fully explained and cited or removed. Natural selection does not actively remove useless things that have little effect on fitness (neutral theory). For the statement above to hold, it needs to be proven that longer UTRs have significant fitness penalties, and that these penalties are offset by the fitness benefits of the added regulation. I haven't studied this particular system, but I suspect the evolutionary dynamics of UTRs is quite complex. I think it is better to say nothing than to casually present a theory without support.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zbwrnz (talk • contribs) 21:01, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Natural selection of UTRs
Talk:List of rivers of Utah

message: The following are shown in USGS GIS data.
*Great Basin Region
**Escalante Desert-Sevier Lake
***Beaver Bottoms-Upper Beaver
***East Fork Sevier
***Escalante Desert
***Lower Beaver
***Lower Sevier
***Middle Sevier
***San Pitch
***Sevier Lake
***Upper Sevier
**Great Salt Lake
***Curlew Valley
***Great Salt Lake
***Hamlin-Snake Valleys
***Northern Great Salt Lake Desert
***Pilot-Thousand Springs
***Pine Valley
***Rush-Tooele Valleys
***Skull Valley
***Southern Great Salt Lake Desert
***Tule Valley
**Jordan (Great Salt Lake)
***Jordan
***Provo
***Spanish Fork
***Utah Lake
**Lower Bear (Bear)
***Bear Lake
***Little Bear-Logan
***Lower Bear-Malad
***Middle Bear
**Upper Bear (Bear)
***Central Bear
***Upper Bear
**Weber (Great Salt Lake)
***Lower Weber
***Upper Weber
*Lower Colorado Region
**Lower Colorado-Lake Mead
***Fort Pierce Wash
***Kanab
***Lower Virgin
***Meadow Valley Wash
***Upper Virgin
*Pacific Northwest Region
**Upper Snake
***Goose
***Raft
*Upper Colorado Region
**Colorado Headwaters
***Colorado Headwaters-Plateau
**Lower Green
***Ashley-Brush
***Duchesne
***Lower Green
***Lower Green-Diamond
***Price
***San Rafael
***Strawberry
***Willow
**Lower San Juan (San Juan)
***Chinle
***Lower San Juan
***Lower San Juan-Four Corners
***Mcelmo
***Montezuma
**Upper Colorado-Dirty Devil
***Dirty Devil
***Escalante
***Fremont
***Lower Lake Powell
***Muddy
***Paria
***Upper Lake Powell
**Upper Colorado-Dolores
***Lower Dolores
***Upper Colorado-Kane Springs
***Upper Dolores
***Westwater Canyon
**Upper Green (Great Divide-Upper Green)
***Blacks Fork
***Muddy
***Upper Green-Flaming Gorge Reservoir
**White-Yampa
***Lower White
--NE2 00:12, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Watersheds
Talk:Kihansi spray toad

message: Isn't the Kihansi Spray toad extinct?
*In the wild (most likely) Yes, in captivity No. In fact I just saw several today (at the Toledo Zoo). Ruby 1x2 (talk) 03:59, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can anybody confirm that the frogs were successfully released into the wild in 2011..?  -- Somarinoa (talk) 23:55, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release into habitat 

message: importance of kihansi spray toad in Tanzania 41.222.181.45 (talk) 08:44, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  abdulbastnassor@gmail.com
Talk:Anna Loginova

message: External link is broken as of 04/11/2013. I am not going to look for another one, but I am removing this one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hajder (talk • contribs) 15:36, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: External link