Talk:Water gun

message: I removed the picture as it was a rather un-necessarily gratuitous picture. Out of the millions of different water guns available, I didn't think it was necessary to show a sexually connotive one, especially as a page like this would mostly be viewed by children. Not that there's anything wrong with the picture technically, but rather I feel this is a move by a user to get sexually suggestive content onto pages which is completely un-needed. --86.24.162.140 (talk) 15:24, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been monitoring and thus reviewing this article for some time and it's never occurred to me that it might sexually connotative.  Only when you pointed it out did I consider it, and even now it took some time to realize what you might be pointing out.  (It's the trigger, yes?) Your concern is appreciated, but I think you're over cautious in this case. — Alan De Smet | Talk 20:15, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

text: I'm decidedly unclear how an explicitly "naughty" water gun sheds any light on this particular image.  :File:Male human buttocks.jpg would also be inappropriate and provides similar insight into the situation.  Heck, were someone to note (ideally with citations), "Some water guns are shaped like other objects, including taboo objects, for novelty effect," a photo of the penis shaped water gun might be a very appropriate illustration.  Ultimately Wikipedia has no particular goal to protect children from any of a wide and set of possible offensive images.  Any child smart enough to browse the web can trivially find extremely explicit imagery (e.g penis).  A child's toy that might be perceived as offensive by some people isn't a big danger.  If you'd like to offer up a superior photo of another water gun, that would be great.  But for now it's the image we have.  A photograph of reasonably typical, cheap children's toy is a useful illustrative example, and the article is stronger for it. — Alan De Smet | Talk 04:36, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:File:Watergun.jpg]]

message: Wonder if this link would be appropriate?--Vertigo200 01:55, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed link to i-mockery 

message: thought that these are classified as toys, why the reference to firearms? Seems like the media in general regards any projectile launching device to be some sort of "gun" or "firearm" even if its clearly a toy.
would an image from the following image be possible to use? strange why such an akward and uncommon shape of a water blaster is used.
link: https://www.google.com/search?q=water+blaster&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hl=en&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=KAOkUbP2FPj84AOJi4DwBQ&biw=1024&bih=653&sei=KQOkUZOZNNj64APju4DoAw
Nerfmaster8 (talk) 01:09, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "gun" or blaster? 

message: There's no history section in this article? 90.2.141.89 (talk) 23:59, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Also according to this article, the earliest reference to squirt guns is in 1865, but in an article about Jeffery Hudson, a dwarf of the queen, he shot and killed a guy in 1644 that came to a dual armed with a squirt gun. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Hudson#Duel_and_disaster 73.98.228.38 (talk) 15:19, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: History?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Water gun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090708072151/http://www.isoaker.com:80/WaterWar/Players/soaker_tech_basics.html to http://www.isoaker.com/WaterWar/Players/soaker_tech_basics.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090119041222/http://www.isoaker.com:80/Armoury/Analysis/0/larami_uzi.html to http://www.isoaker.com/Armoury/Analysis/0/larami_uzi.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:40, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I see it the first time in a video about violent protests against Trump at the Inauguration day. E.g. here http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/inauguration-anti-donald-trump-protesters-smash-windows-clash-washington-dc-police-ceremony-a7538031.html at 0:30. If this is a water gun that the police use, should this not added? --Lastwebpage (talk) 23:17, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Water guns against riots?