Talk:David and Lisa

message: :Image:David and Lisa.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:50, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:David and Lisa.jpg

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 19:39, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: How could a 1962 movie have made $1MM in rentals in its first week? Anchoress 19:45, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rentals? 

message: I was considering it for class, remembering the prestige it had. The photography is still beautiful, the music frightening.  Da Silva has the great voice, Dullea is mannered but it works. Janet Margolin overacts but is still a NY boy's idea of beautiful, as Winona Ryder was later. Her brief poetic masturbation scene was so unlike anything anybody had ever dared put in an American film, one could barely believe what one had just seen. It was so far out, audience disbelief in what she was engaged in probably saved the scene from being cut. This film came out at a time when middle class people were first starting to see shrinks, though not openly, and there was great curiosity. Nobody should take it for a documentary about psychiatry, either then or now.  Dr. Swinton solves problems by saying just the right question at the right time, and the insight instantly cures. That was the popular belief then. Far more significant is the way, in Kennedy era pre Vietnam 1962, the Fifties style parents already are being talked back to, even demonized. The oldest Baby Boomers, like myself, were in the senior year of high school and this suited us down to the ground.  One can see the Sixties rebellions coming, and "communication," "freedom," and general mental health being used as a justification.Profhum (talk) 05:12, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fascinating period piece

message: Are we batting these two versions back and forth for the sake of good writing — or as some kind of pissing contest? Because "his apparently caring mother" is not only unsupported POV, it's also pretty clunky writing. Why're we doing this? — HarringtonSmith (talk) 18:48, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ping-pong reverts 

message: I saw this movie when it came out, and my recollection it that the credits included something like 'based on "Lisa and David" by ...'  
My research today shows that the author is Theodore Isaac Rubin.  Shouldn't this original source be included in the article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.45.200.48 (talk) 06:18, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the book? 

message: It occurs to me that if the film is mistaken in its identification of the disorders exemplified by the titular characters, it is original research on our part to correct it.  That being said, we do not need to repeat the film's error either by calling either character "schizophrenic".  I will therefore omit the specific identifications made by previous editors but leave the descriptions of the symptoms as they are. (The page does not get a lot of editorial traffic, so it seems pointless to wait for feedback.)  ZarhanFastfire (talk) 05:07, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The types of disorders 

message: Was the creation of the rare intelligent (although somewhat weird) personality of David Clemens inspired by the life and work of English computer-pioneer and mathematician Alan Turing? Both Keir Dullea (David Clemens) and Alan Turing could have been brothers (same looks), and above all there was this ingenious invention from David called the Radio-Controlled Clock (I have one of these radio-controlled clocks hanging on the wall). Was the real invention of the radio-controlled clock inspired by Frank Perry's David and Lisa? Or vice versa? Who was the real inventor of the radio-controlled clock? DannyJ.Caes (talk) 16:52, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''David Clemens'' and Alan Turing 

message: The cold and stiff appearances of David Clemens (seen during the first minutes of Perry's David and Lisa) remind me the odd behaviour of Herr Otto Flick (Richard Gibson) from the British sitcom Allo Allo!. DannyJ.Caes (talk) 16:52, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''David Clemens'' and ''Herr Otto Flick'' (''Allo Allo!'')