lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ma On Shan (peak)

message: Re user:Alanmak's edit summary " Does the analogy apply in this case? "  - Yes it does, since you're arguing the geographical perspective shall apply . — Instantnood 22:36, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Analogy

message: Wikipedia isn't exempt from plagiarism ethics. This page copied a lot directly from the Hong Kong government website:
http://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/country/cou_vis/cou_vis_cou/cou_vis_cou_mos/cou_vis_cou_mos.html
i.e. the section titled "Major Attractions"
"Major Attractions
Ma On Shan, rising 702 metres above sea level, is the second highest peak in the New Territories, ranking just after Tai Mo Shan, and the fourth highest peak in Hong Kong..."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.79.181.141 (talk) 02:50, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Violation 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/country/cou_vis/cou_vis_cou/cou_vis_cou_mos/cou_vis_cou_mos.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Rockfang (talk) 23:55, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:The Unvanquished

message: thank you for making this page, amazingly enough I was just going to do it, as I have the pleasure of reading the book for class.
*either that's some coincidence, or I'm in the same class with you, cause so do I. -Goldom 莨夊ｩｱ 謚慕ｨｿ 00:52, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

message: If it was first published as a novel in 1938, why is the date of the first edition given as 1940?92.23.114.67 (talk) 15:46, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know but my copy says first published 1938.--EchetusXe 21:05, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pedantic point about the date
Talk:Kamen Rider Stronger

message: All the character links under "Characters" are dead. They just lead back to this article or the main Kamen Rider article, rendering them effectively useless. Takeshi357 (talk) 22:45, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

message: What are the sources to Kamen Rider Stronger having low ratings? I've never really seen actual numbers and the final episode of Stronger does indeed say "Farewell Kamen Riders" after showing a montoge of footage from Kamen Rider~Amazon set to the themes of Kamen Rider and V3. So that would lead one to assume that it was intended to be the final series. Kazuhara 14:10, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're talking about two different things. Whether the series was intended to be the last is a subject of the debate, nobody questions that Toei/Ishinomiri/TBS was unhappy with the franchise, otherwise they wouldn't have waited four years between Stronger to produce New Kamen Rider. By the time the series was nearing its end, the production team knew that they wouldn't be producing another series for some time. Regardless, according to August Ragone, it was NET's broadcast of Himitsu Sentai Goranger that led to the downfall of Stronger— the two aired in direct competition with each other. See  and , containing insights from tokusatsu historian August Ragone and others, including one Tetsuo Takagi who personally verifies the competition between the two and the wild success of Goranger. These two references are also used as footnotes in the main article text. If there's any way you think you can make the text more clear, please edit it.--Sean Black 15:55, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ratings
Talk:European Coalition Free Belarus

message: I should start out by stating that I know nothing about the subject in question here. I came to this page hoping to find out what the term "European Coalition Free Belarus" meant. While I couldn't dispute any of the points found here, even if I wanted to, I have to say that the content of this stub reads like a blatantly POV screed. I realize this is just a stub, but when I can practically hear the author's teeth grinding when I read something, my faith in its objectivity is shaken. Could someone who knows something about this, and who is less emotionally involved, clean this up a little bit? —CKA3KA (Skazka) 22:57, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Very little in this article dealt with the actual political party, and the rest of it belongs in an article on the election itself. The tangential text has been removed. --Adamrush 00:00, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV?
Talk:Alabama Centennial half dollar

message: Shouldn't this page have been protected temporarily to avoid vandalism during Main page appearance? I've gone ahead and requested temporary page protection given recent edits. Some reverting is needed. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:37, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure if TFAs are usually temporarily protected prior to their appearance on the main page.  I think it's good practice to do so anyway. - ZLEA T\C 16:07, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: What a mess!  May need your assistance identifying the best version of the article to revert to, given recent changes. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:38, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The diffs were too messy to reconcile so I've reverted pre-TFA and hope that those who have contributed with actual improvements will be understanding. I've also semi-protected for 12 hours.--Wehwalt (talk) 17:19, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , Much appreciated. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:42, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page protection
Talk:Zhongshan Island

message: What is the Chinese name of this island? — Instantnood 23:05, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Me neither.  I think it might refer to the peninsula about 500 years ago - as, I believe, it was a mud spit that was filled in.  Requires research. SchmuckyTheCat 22:12, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What I'm thinking is that it is an island separated from the continent by the distributaries around. — Instantnood 22:19, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ?  Right where the peninsula connects to the mainland, it's actually fairly thin plot of land.  I've read this was muddy 500 years ago, and was water during high tide.  It was filled in.  Thus, what is now the peninsula was formerly an island and this name referred to that.  I can't verify this right now, and don't know that I believe it either. SchmuckyTheCat 22:37, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wait. You're talking about the Macao Peninsula, am I right? Obviously that's not what this article talks about. The article actually says, IMHO, the Macao Peninsula is part of this island. The urban centre of Zhuhai and part of Zhongshan probably also lie on this island. — Instantnood 23:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Roughly, on this map , Shenwan, Tanzhou, Qianshan, Gongbei, Tangjia, Jingding,  Nanlang, Hengmen, Zhongshangang, Dongsheng, Xiaolan, Henglan, Dachong, Banfu are on this island, iff it's "Zhongchan Dao" is really referring to the island separated from the continent by distributaries. — Instantnood 23:33, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese name

message: ;Current revision
;Instantnood (Talk | contribs)
;(Is this a mirror too? http://www.worldislandinfo.com/SUPERLATIVESV2.html)
::Sort of, it looks like a compilation of statistics from the rest of Wikipedia.  In any case, it's not a citable page. SchmuckyTheCat 20:13, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it a Wikipedia mirror site, as you've claimed ? — Instantnood 20:20, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk pages, not edit summaries, are for discussion

message: This is not an island, and if it is, its real name should be Zhongshan Island (中山島) instead of Zhongchan Dao.
Zhongshan Island was once an island but now fused into the mainland. As for the details, you can see this if you can understand Chinese: :zh:中山市--LosAngelesT (talk) 17:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not an island 
Talk:Walter Donaldson (songwriter)

message: This needs to be split into sections to identify Walter's many collaborators.
: I did not add or delete any songs, but added the collaborators if any. I also removed redlinks (because they were the majority) and some other links (because they led to different works with the same title). I'll try to add some more information (year, citation, show or movie if any.) Richard K. Carson (talk) 00:47, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collaborators 
Talk:Naoki Tatsuta

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
Extensive lists of work, but still a Stub as far as WP:BIO is concerned.
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 18:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment
Talk:D.I. (band)

message: Is this song sarcastic or serious? The lyrics seem ambiguous as to whether it's serious or not. The Ungovernable Force 08:06, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Guns

message: I would like some evidence of how 12.47.169.125 knows that D.I. stands for "Drug Induced". 65.222.216.15 13:42, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: D.I. originally stood for Drug Ideology, but not for long. Unfortunately there is probably no source anywhere that would prove it. It's just something that those of us who were lucky enough to be punks in Fullerton in the early 80s know. Druff (talk) 20:48, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Initials for the band's name

message: I'm not sure that this date is correct. I saw D.I. play with Fear and I'm 99% positive that it was in 2000. They also only had one guitarist at the time as opposed to the two that are currently listed so I think there's a mistake on this page. Thepanicattacks 23:30, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, Steve. There's too much incorrect information on this article. I also did a correction for Caseyology, which is actually a studio album not an EP. Offspringman (talk) 00:59, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reunited in 2002?? 

message: Whoever wrote this knew little of what they were talking about musically, basically calling mostly underground melodic hardcore punk and punk rock bands who formed in the late 80's poseur-punk bands, whatever that means, the first example cited is a completely irrelevant, unknown band with a MySpace page. Only the Offspring kind of changed their sound in that direction when they made extremely popular singles almost on purpose (while the rest of their albums remain true to the Offspring who broke out in 1994 with the most-sold ever indie label record). 
Also there's the issue that poseur-punk is not a genre but a weasel word. 156.57.177.108 (talk) 13:04, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  D.I. influenced poseur-punk bands? Maybe F.T.E who's lack of a wiki entry and who's reference being their myspace page... 
Talk:The Smashing Pumpkins 1991–1998

message: Can anyone find proof that there were only 1000 copies pressed? DeadDisco
:I don't have any sources, but I rather suspect that there are a LOT more than that.  they've never been at all hard to get ahold of 142.59.195.50 08:13, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1000 Copies? 
Talk:Fitzalan Pursuivant Extraordinary

message: As my edit summary said, I think this should either be the full name, or Fitzalan Pursuivant. I don't care much which, but the compromise is pointless. Septentrionalis 23:22, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The naming convention for all of the other officers of arms seems to be Lancaster Herald and Dingwall Pursuivant. Doesn't it make sense to indicate that an office is extraordinary by appending that word to the existing naming convention? It makes sense to me, at least, but I'd be open to your reasoning for desiring a change. I can understand that you may want the full title, but why would you equally be happy with a misleading title of simply Fitzalan Pursuivant?--Eva db 05:35, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Eva. I don't care much for the second choice given by Septentrionalis.--Boven 16:37, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Fitzalan Pursuivant seems to be actually used; it is enough to demote the office unambiguously. Septentrionalis 05:53, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming convention

message: changed John Martin Robinson's tenure from 1982–1998 to 1982–1989 without comment, introducing a nine-year vacancy.  Some evidence either way would be welcome. —Tamfang (talk) 23:37, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, seems he was promoted to Maltravers Herald Extraordinary in 1989. Never mind. —Tamfang (talk) 00:27, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  1989 or 1998
Talk:Peter Collier (writer)

message: This page is awaiting more info --Zleitzen 23:23, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wilfrid Scott-Giles

message: Why omit the Charles, and use a form the subject did not? C. W. Scott-Giles is a perfectly possible article name; so is Charles Wilfrid. Septentrionalis 23:25, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In the sources that I've read, the name is usually given as Wilfrid Scott-Giles. These were contemporary sources, so I assumed that this was a name that he used exclusively in personal communications. Did he always publish as "CW," or did he sometimes use Charles, Charles Wilfrid, or Wilfrid?--Eva db 05:31, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Name
Talk:Linux-Magazin

message: The German version of this article states it's the second oldest Linux magazine in Germany, not in the World. Who is right? And which is supposed to be the oldest? --Erdal Ronahi 23:28, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: de:Linux-Magazin now says: "The Linux Magazine is the second oldest magazine about Linux (and claims to be the oldest in Europe)." The MEDIALINX AG site says: "Europe's oldest media brand serving an emerging IT market." This is a claim from the publisher itself rather than an independent third party. But obviously, if the oldest came from outside Europe, then the second oldest—if based in Europe—would be the first in Europe. A review of :Category:Linux magazines finds the American Linux Journal, "the first magazine to be published about the Linux kernel and operating systems based on it." The first issue was published in March 1994. So Linux-Magazin, whose first issue appeared in October 1994, could be the second, but we should have an independent source confirm that. Nothing else in :Category:Linux magazines started before 1995, but we don't have a start date for the InfoStrada's magazine. Best to be less specific in our claims, until we find more definitive sourcing.  Note that my quotes of the above German-language sources are based on Google Chrome translations. – Wbm1058 (talk) 14:31, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Calanque

message: I have put this page on top of my to-do. It may have a weird look for some time, but I'll eventually get there... :) -- Grafikm_fr (AutoGRAF) 23:41, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1953 Waco tornado outbreak

message: This belongs in an article about 1953 tornadoes or something like that. Happywaffle (talk) 19:36, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I think the death toll should be kept in, but if this tornado was part of a bigger multiple state outbreak then there should be a separate page for it. Texas (talk) 01:40, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Confirmed Tornadoes

message: At first, the article says 30 people were killed in this building, but later it says 22. This needs to be clarified. 
76.227.77.30 (talk) 15:46, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Deaths in Dennis Building
Talk:Alien Workshop

message: To be taken seriously, this article should have a reliable statement of annual sales. Student7 (talk) 21:08, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Seriously?

message: Go here and then change this page to be more accurate
http://www.slapmagazine.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=787&Itemid=27  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chickenscanskate (talk • contribs) 04:32, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure how this would help. The linked page is a slapdash of commentary rather than having many significant facts that would help the article. Worse, the article is written WP:POV & WP:PR, even WP:SPAM like it was a company handout and not objective. Hard to take this stuff seriously. Student7 (talk) 03:51, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  go to here
Talk:Sclerocyte

message: This is just a note to acknowledge the discrepancy between this page and spicule.  The article which I read stated that sclerocytes form spicules individually, and not in pairs.  It is certainly possible that different sponges achieve the process differently; the article cited on the spicule page concerned freshwater sponges.  If someone  (possibly the author) could cite the source used here so that this could be cleared up, that would be great. Cerealkiller13 23:55, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spicule formation
File talk:Jupiter-Earth-Red Spot comparison.jpg

message: I want to replace the inaccurate: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Jupiter-Earth-Spot_comparison.jpg but I am unsure how to do this properly.  It is created by the same two source images, so the licensing should be the same. JasonAD 00:05, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Click on the link that says "Upload a new version of this file". --MER-C 11:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Flat Display Mounting Interface

message: What size are the bolts that fit into the holes?
:Please see update in article.
::Thanks for the update, but it only tells me that I need M4 metric screws. My mounting bracket (VESA) is 200 x 200 and the supplied screws are too small (diameter) for the VESA (Samsung) LCDTV? Is there a table of the correct mounting screw sizes for the small, medium and large VESA mounting standards?
While MIS-D uses M4 threads, from what I can gather from page 20 of this document, MIS-F uses either M6 (10 mm deep) or M8 (15 mm deep) threads. I've updated the article accordingly. Your TV manual might contain kankerhond the full VESA MIS designation under "Technical data". See the ISO metric screw thread article for how to identify metric screw threads by their minor diameter, which you can measure easily with a caliper. Sadly, the actual FDMI 1.1 standard is with 350 USD a bit pricy for casual reading by an interested Wikipedian. Standards want to be free! Markus Kuhn 12:34, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Screw sizes

message: What maximum weights are defined for each bracket dimension ? Can a manufacturer decide its 50 kg panel will use a 75x75 mm plate ? or is there a limit set in the specification ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.167.193.66 (talk) 16:29, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There are specific limits (like 8 kg for 75x75), I have added them to the article. Jbohmdk (talk) 02:52, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Weight

message: The table of Vesa standards does not show any heading for 'Vesa nnn' but the picture is captioned as a 'Vesa 200' mount. This terminology (Vesa nnn) is generally used in association with commercial product.
In the case of 'Vesa 200', is this 200 * 100, 200 * 200, or should it support both dimensions?
The article does not make this clear.  
LittleGreyCat (talk) 19:40, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vesa 200
Talk:Product (business)

message: Analysis online seller in online selling products 120.28.216.68 (talk) 01:05, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  practical research 

message: Does this article belong in wikiproject Industrial design? -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 21:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Industrial design? 

message: About a girl who moves into a house and wishes on a shooting star and finds a talking spirit fox .charters mila roro the spirit fox spirit hunters mia milas mom dave milas dad 174.251.192.152 (talk) 17:12, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A mov 

message: In management, a product is an object that an industrial enterprise alters into a product that satisfies a client's demands. The products are both the goods and services offered by the industrial enterprise.
The idea behind this is that looking at the definition of the word "Product" it has two classifications - goods and services. Both good and services are the only two types of product, its two dimensions. Also from a management point of view, they are clearly distinguishable dimensions. The way to differentiate them is to look at the enterprise perspective. When we have goods, that means  that the enterprise has bought the raw materials (initial object state) from which it performs some processes and creates the final product-good. The enterprise can buy a broken laptop as initial object state and fix it and offer it to sell it and that is its good as well. But when we have services the client brings his broken laptop and the enterprise fixes it. The initial object state is not the property of the enterprise so this is a service. Machining, processing, painting, renting... all of those are services because the enterprise does not own the initial object state while an engine manufacturing, el. equipment manufacturing, etc. are goods because the enterprise has bought the raw materials and own the object through out.
Leonard Gauthier (talk) 11:57, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Management theory perspective?
Template talk:Non-free aircraft image

message: The template may be seen below:
A common additional piece of reasoning is as follows: the aircraft was never put into production/does not exist today, therefore the creation of an equivalent free image is impossible.
Do these reasons amount to a valid justification for fairuse?  Ingoolemo talk 00:14, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps. When an aircraft does not exist, very limited fair use may be valid.--Jusjih 11:41, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes on the need for faid use. It's plainly impossible to replace fair use and it's impossible to adequately portray the appearance of an aircraft without a photograph. Whether the specific image is fair use woudl depend on the image and context but it seems very likely, since images of aircraft are usually marketing materials and are usually not used for marketing in Wikipedia articles. Jamesday 22:21, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But is it necessary "to adequately portray the appearance of an aircraft"? --Damian Yerrick (☎) 06:28, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

text: You would also still need to provide fair use rationale. The fair use tag is not adequate in establishing by it is fair use; you must always provide fair use rationale when uploading a fair use image.↔NMajdan•talk 14:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Valid fair use reasoning?
Talk:I Stand Alone (film)

message: It is, quite frankly, shit. I've sorted it out a bit, but it's still got allot to be done and I'm tired.
:Plot and introduction edited for neutrality.--176.56.174.253 (talk) 21:09, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary 

message: In the French original, he says their love is too "puissant", not "pure". The word "puissant", meaning "powerful", exists in English but may be difficult to understand. Should we change "pure" to "powerful" in the article ? 201.231.171.234 (talk) 22:43, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --176.56.174.253 (talk) 21:10, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pure vs. puissant ?