lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nissan SR engine

message: As far as I am aware, the SR16VE N1 had only 500 examples produced, 200 Serie 1 and 300 Serie 2 Pulsar VZ-R. The "redtop" version, where the non-N1 had a bluetop. My source cannot be cited tho, since I found this out some time ago, when I got my own Pulsar VZ-R N1 Serie 1. There is also a question where is article contradicts the main Pulsar article, where is says in the N15 section about the N1, "Producing 200 PS from its 1.6 L SR16VE engine, it claimed the highest specific output for a production car prior to the introduction of the Honda S2000."  --Preveen 18:27, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SR16VE N1 

message: Does anyone know the specs on the sr16/20ve main cap bolts ?
Where these engines used in any american applications ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobh510 (talk • contribs) 00:37, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  sr20/16ve main bolts 

message: The section on the SR20VE seems to be mixing up whether its power values are in imperial horsepower (hp) or metric horsepower (PS). This is evidenced by the fact that it initially states the engine produces 190 PS but then in the section that shows the models it was used in lists the power for 3 out of the 4 entries as 190 hp.
--TKOIII (talk) 16:44, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks, sorry it took so long. 190 and 204 PS is correct. I also fixed the torque output: Japanese manufacturers are still using kgm as their main units.  Mr.choppers | ✎  02:57, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The SR20VE section appears to be self contradictory
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/WebEx and Min Zhu/Workshop

message: Question: are we allowed to comment (in the marked spaces) at this stage?  Also, any idea of timescales?  I have decided to leave content of the articles alone now pending decision; if a decision is likely soon I will also propose that the rather heated debate on the talk pages is stopped. I think we've explored the subject as much as is productive anyway. Thanks, Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C]  AfD? 21:45, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think your always allowed to comment on things on the workshop page in the appropriate section. JtkieferT | C | @  ---- 00:51, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

text: As I understand it, Larvatus and I have decided not to edit the article (I've mostly refrained from commenting on the talk page as well). I don't think most "outside" editors, whose opinion would be valuable, would be too keen on stepping into an article central to a current arbitration committee case. Whatever "consensus" is hammered out on the talk page is unlikely to be very stable once the committee issues guidance or declines to do so, and editing returns to "normal" on the page. Demi T/C 03:44, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Bosnian uprising (1831–1832)

message: "The fight for autonomy" section is a copy and paste from . Please don't restore it unless you have proof of permission for use. (And keep the 3RR rule in mind.) --Fang Aili 21:51, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Correction: Live Forever told me that s/he wrote the section for Husein Gradascevic. But now I'm not sure what to do because the entirety of Great Bosnian uprising is copied from there. I'm sure there are guidelines on this, but I'm not familiar with them at the moment. --Fang Aili 14:57, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Blazing Dragons

message: Does anyone know what system Blazing Dragons is for? As in Video Game system? Just curious. Or is it for the PC only?Unknown Dragon 23:44, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Game on!

message: What about that monster in Episode 1, Quest for the Holy Quail? The one that Count Geoffrey and Merle were going to feed Queen Griddle to? According to the monk or peasant or whatever, it was called something like Yoldemort the Many-Fanged. Shouldn't he be in the list of characters? 24.65.118.20 (talk) 05:34, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think he (or it) appeared in more than one episode, in which case it isn't a character, it's a plot device.GreyWyvern (talk) 13:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing Character

message: What platforms, systems, release dates, and so on.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 5th wolf (talk • contribs) 17:29, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video Game information needed 

message: Professor Flicker has a link from his webpage to this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.180.29.48 (talk) 19:05, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Fun fact

message: I'd like to recommend that the section on the completely unrelated basketball team have its own article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.253.19.169 (talk) 07:13, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basketball Team 

message: The infobox states that its original channel in Canada was Teletoon, but this show premiered in 1996, and Teletoon didn't launch until 1997. 2600:6C5A:417F:794E:E097:8FEF:F347:2E22 (talk) 02:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Channel?
Talk:Mitsuko Horie

message: With the greatest respect to Danny Lilithborne, who I don't doubt posted the information in good faith, it's been a few days now and there is no confirmation of Horie's death from any source. Her website isn't carrying the news, and even more tellingly there doesn't seem to be any mention of it on the site's forum. My Japanese is appalling, but there was nothing there resembling an announcement of her death as far as I could see. Perhaps a Japanese-speaking Wikipedian could confirm this?
With this in mind, I've removed the news of her death from her page (80.229.139.226 is me - seems I forgot to log in). If it turns out to be true, please revert it, but please, if you do, then at least provide sources. Ideally we should be citing sources for everything anyway... in practice this doesn't really happen, but for something as important as this, a source is definitely required.
--Dooky 21:58, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding rumours of Horie's death 

message: Someone has been putting a bunch of weird info out there on places like the imdb.com  that she was born in Taiwan, lived in Taiwan, was half-Taiwanese, etc.  The born in Taiwan imdb.com entry (with the wrong birthdate as well) part is verifiably false, and I can't find anything to verify the other Taiwan stuff either.  Most telling, there is no Chinese-language Wiki-entry for her; you'd think if she was so "huge in Taiwan" there would be.  Clarification and sources are requested. Evan1975 19:58, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no one said anything, I've removed the unsourced Taiwan reference. Evan1975 23:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Taiwan

message: http://www.animelyrics.com/anime/doraemon/bokutachi.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.159.10.186 (talk) 15:14, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing entry for her discography
Talk:Expecting (Angel)

message: Please help complete the Angel/Buffy episode articles. See what needs to be done on this sub-page of WikiProject Buffy:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Buffy/Episodes
Also please help update any major changes made to episode articles on that page so that progress can be mapped.
________________________________________________________
 Punkmorten 22:00, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:University of North Texas Research Park

message: This is the beginning of a list of some of the content that should be added to this page.  Other ideas are definitely welcome.
*History - including Texas Instruments, dormant time, purchase by UNT, and home of College of Engineering
*Current uses - including College of Engineering and computer support
*Maps - both to Research Park and internal maps
*Future plans
The College of Engineering section should have several subsections including
*Departments
**Computer Science & Engineering
**Electrical Engineering
**Engineering Technology
**Materials Science and Engineering
**Mechanical and Energy Engineering (begins 2007)
*Research
*Student Organizations
These are rough ideas. This can all be changed as the article progresses.
Rylan42 22:03, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Needed Content
Talk:Sacking of Lawrence

message: There is reference to the destruction of the Free State Hotel and the printing presses as semi-legal and legal. How could it be considered legal??? Johnor 10:16, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I took out the part about the second sacking because it has its own article.  I also added some context.  The attack was "semi-legal" because it was a federally-authorized de-arming of renegade citizens.  More work needs to be done, but I'm not going to do it just yet.  Kgwo1972 19:23, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Now I have added two "actual sources."  Kgwo1972 17:32, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Update: This journal article convincingly argues that none of the actions were "legal" or "semi-legal," although many history books say otherwise.  I have edited accordingly. Kgwo1972 19:32, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Semi-legal, and legal???

message: the sacking of Lawrence, in which a sheriff-led posse destroyed newspaper offices, a hotel, and killed two men (Pottawatomie Massacre#Background). гык 20:19, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Were 2 men killed or no?
Talk:Capital loss

message: Losses are merely negative gains; one page should suffice. Further, I think that the tax ramifications of Capital Losses/Gains should be put as a separate section under Capital Gains. Avi 22:07, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly disagree...capita loss is different from capital gain. Also, please use the merge template if you want to merge.WP:MERGESmallman12q (talk) 16:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly agree that it should be merged into the Capital gain article.  A capital loss (the concept - no its tax treatment) is always just a capital gain with a negative sign.  Both are merely the profit or loss and a loss is a negative profit.  The US tax treatment should be covered on Capital gains tax in the United States; not here.  This article should just redirect to Capital gain.  86.158.229.99 (talk) 19:23, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge into Capital Gain
Talk:1990 NCAA Division I-A football season

message: I Want to make a WikiProject for this, but I don't know how.  Could anyone assit me?
The project would just be filling in the season data for every season back to the DI split in 1978.
:This should be a part of the College Football Wikiproject. Add it there to the todo list. Mecu 16:31, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject

message: The standings do not seem to be complete.  Looking at them, there were a bunch of schools I would have assumed were I-A - BC, Pittsburgh, West Virginia, Army, Navy, etc., which are not listed.  Going to this page, cited here as a reference, it lists all those schools as independents, along with a number of other schools not listed here - all told it appears to list 17 independents that aren't listed here, specifically:
#Southern Miss
#Temple
#East Carolina
#Northern Illinois
#Pittsburgh
#Memphis
#Louisiana-Lafayette
#Boston College
#Tulane
#West Virginia
#Army
#Navy
#Arkansas State
#Rutgers
#Akron
#Tulsa
#Cincinnati
Why aren't they listed here?  What's the story with this? john k (talk) 05:39, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete
Talk:System usability scale

message: I am having trouble understanding the phrase "allow SUS ratings to be positioned relative to other systems."  Does it mean that Bangor et al's normative data allows them to compare systems reliably based on their SUS scores?
Jsarmi (talk) 14:47, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Content=

message: I have concerns about notability of this article. While the SUS may be great and useful tool the article doesn't suggest its acceptance among professionals. Being described in one book does not feel like sufficient reason to have article here, IMHO. I would be only happy to be proven wrong (and see the article improved). Pavel Vozenilek 22:08, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability?
Template talk:Vandalip

message: This is a very good idea for a template.  I imporved it greatly using info I found from User talk:143.231.249.141.  Contact me with any qustions.--michael180 22:10, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That page is currently at User talk:143.231.249.141/Archive2 (version as of 12 Jan 2006). -- Paddu 20:59, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Melville Island (Northern Territory)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 14:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Melville Island (Australia) →  – Per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)#Australia, geographic names should be disambiguated by reference to the state or territory, not Australia. SHB2000 (talk) 08:49, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 September 2022
Talk:BASIC 8

message: The manual refers to the product as BASIC 8 (no decimal point or zero). Most magazines of the era also referred to it in this manner, in both articles and advertisements (I can dig up specific references if you'd like). Can I move it to BASIC 8? <TT>Crotalus horridus <SMALL>(TALK • CONTRIBS)</SMALL></TT> 22:15, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, go ahead. Mirror Vax 22:24, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess it's OK, yes---a better article title to type, and just as correct as the alternative. FYI: WalrusSoft's manual (the 1987 ed., at least) uses "8" on the cover (as on the program disk label) but "8.0" in almost all of the text. Strange. :-) --Wernher 23:14, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move request
Talk:Asset classes

message: I feel that this article could benefit from a significant number of verbiage changes to lessen the reliance on the "we can..." sort of phrasing. It's definitely not in line with the rest of Wikipedia or the Manual of Style. Sean "esqew" Quinn (talk) 02:13, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup required

message: Shouldn't this be a section under assets? Avi 22:15, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged Avi 22:04, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge into Asset

message: What makes this list more correct than any other?  Why are commodities on this list; why are risk-free assets treated separately from fixed income;  and, why are money markets also treated separately from fixed income?  What about foreign currencies?  In short: this article is a hot mess and appears to just be something dumped out of another source. 73.22.229.2 (talk) 06:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Canonical?

message: Should this article also include collectables such as: art, design, classic cars, watches, wine, whisky, Hermès handbags, and perhaps even Nike trainers? Many of these are now firmly established as long-term investments (and some have performed rather better than other asset "types" listed herein). Cheers Cl3phact0 (talk) 18:38, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other "asset classes" (e.g., collectables)
Talk:Voices from the Gathering Storm

message: I own, operate and publish voices.datacorner.com.  Any material I post to voices.datacorner.com and www.datacorner.com is in the public domain.  There is no copyright notice on anything listed in the datacorner.com domain.  If needed, I can place a public domain notice on voices.datacorner.com.
Anything else?
...and I just added the GFDL as a footer to voices.datacorner.com.  OK?
The critical sources listed are both published authors providing their objective evaluation of the book.  Although these evaluations are complimentary, I would argue that they are not 'advertisement' since they are third party evaluations.  Would appreciate any references within Wiki to other book descriptions that I might use for guidance as to Wiki compliance. Datacorner 16:17, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial comment

message: I do not see the point in having an article on books which are not notable. This book is not notable yet. Alan Liefting 09:34, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is it worth keeping this article?
Talk:Romanians/Archive 1

message: The 250,000 estimate is quite wrong, mainly because 385,000 people of Ukraine declared themselves "Romanians" at the last census. Sometimes, the census figures may be underestimates of their numbers (for one reason or another, people declared themselves of the majority ethnicity, in this case Ukrainian, rather than of their real origin, or in some cases could be even a falsification of the data by the state), but almost never overestimations. Bogdan | Talk 22:12, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romanians in Ukraine 

message: From the article: "During World War II, Romania lost territory in both east and west… Both losses were facilitated by the Ribbentrop-Molotov German-Soviet non-aggression pact."
That may be loosely true, but, as I understand it, it is misleading. Unless I am mistaken, the pact said nothing at all about these lands. Obviously, Romania suffered from the fact of German-Soviet cooperation while it lasted, but the wording here seems to me to suggest that there was something in the pact about carving up Romania. Can someone clarify whether or not the pact had anything to say about these territories, and perhaps then word the article appropriately? -- Jmabel | Talk 01:46, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
In the Ribbentrop-Molotov pact Germany recognized the right of Soviet Union over Bessarabia.MihaiC 06:51, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ribbentrop-Molotov pact 
Talk:Brackenridge, Pennsylvania

message: I thought it was named for Judge Brackenridge?  That's what the sign says on Freeport Road. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Puskarm (talk • contribs) 18:20, 12 January, 2006 (UTC)
: They were both judges, but I assume you mean Hugh Henry Brackenridge.  Both his page here and the borough's website () say it was named for his son, Henry Marie Brackenridge, who owned a large estate nearby (most of which became Tarentum). Erskiji (talk) 21:08, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official name 
Talk:No. 120 Squadron RAF

message: 119 seems to be about this squadron?  Can someone clear this up? NickelShoe 22:21, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[No. 119 Squadron RAF]]

message: This article has been appreciably improved since its 'Stub Class' assessment some time ago.  It should be re-assessed as 'Start Class' or above at an early opportunity.  Ringwayobserver (talk) 20:23, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Need for re-assessment
Talk:Agronomy

message: I dont like this  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:2C0:8700:42E0:9D41:1D0F:F19E:3C (talk) 06:07, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: This is stupid

message: I don't really understand the difference between these two disciplins and the article might benefit from a clarification on this matter.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michalchik (talk • contribs) 22:03, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Horticulture vs. Agronomy

message: The recently-added statement "Triticale contains more usable protein than does either rye or wheat" could use a little refinement, mainly because the definition of "usable" depends on the application.     In feeding swine, for example, the high levels of the amino acid lysine found in most triticale cultivars is a big advantage.  In making leavened breads, however, the gluten in wheat protein is far superior to that of triticale.  I would also suggest moving the original statement and any additions from agronomy to triticale.  --Belgrano 22:28, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Triticale

message: This should not be merged because the two disciplines in question, do not appear to be one in the same.Meissmart 23:29, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I removed the tags and merged agronomics with agricultural economics. Carcharoth 16:45, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge

message: There is a great deal to say (and I don't know enough fo write it) on thd history of this topic. There needs be a section on it. deisenbe (talk) 17:39, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section needed
Help talk:Advanced templates

message: The sheer number of missing templates on this page (about 90% of them are broken) make this page completely unreadable.  None of the examples work, and reading this documentation when  you don't know what to expect is confusing at the least, and gibberish at the worst.--Terrabull (talk) 20:51, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this page is a mess, but take a look at the one on meta. --  Nx/talk  23:39, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing Templates

message: This is confusing.--Arceus fan 15:59, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  From [[Meta:Help talk:Advanced templates]] 

message: Hello. Can someone go into my subpage on the SNN and edit it so that if I was to type  it would read  instead of whats usually there.--Launchballer (talk) 14:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting 

message: I have replaced the article with a soft redirect to metawikipedia:Help:Advanced templates because the articles were orginally the same and the version here had since been amended and had its example templates amended or deleted (or deleted then undeleted in amended form) leaving this version of the article confusing if not useless (as evidenced by some of the above comments).
The edit history here shows that the page used to be a soft redirect. The edit history and talk page above do not explain why the soft redirect was replaced with text pasted in from the meta article in 2006, but the detrimental changes here seem to justify reverting to a link to the article on meta, where the content seems to have been better maintained.
— Richardguk (talk) 01:08, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recreated soft redirect to metawikipedia:Help:Advanced templates
Talk:Internet hosting service

message: There is a list of 'limited or application-specific hosting services', including web hosting, but neither this article, nor the web hosting article makes clear what the limitations are. I know that the Web is just a tiny part of the Internet, but I thought it was actually an extension of it, with the addition of links. Or is this a case of being application-specific (and what does that mean then)? Does this have to do with whether a url starts with www, signifying a web server? (which Wikipedia doesn't have, by the way - any reason for that?) DirkvdM 15:56, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limited services - limited in what way? 

message: I'm removing this map from the article because it depicts the total number of Internet-connected hosts, including (overwhelmingly?) client systems, not just servers.  This article is about hosted servers, not clients.  The map is also out of date, and I'm working on updating it.  But it still won't be relevant to this article. --Kbh3rdtalk 15:53, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong map 