Talk:Katipō

message: The only other thing I can think of WRT comprehensiveness is its toxicity vs. mactans and hasseltii. Also the black katipo. Otherwise, stick it up at GAN. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Go for it bro' 

message: The Good Article review can be found here. Dr. Cash (talk) 18:34, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Review

message: A recent case of myocarditis following a katipo spider bite was reported in the NZJM (http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/abstract.php?id=4105). This is significant because it's the first known case of the toxin affecting the heart of a human. Should it be added to the article? Wocky (talk) 06:39, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Katipo causing myocarditis 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Katipo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110417090807/http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/122-1290/3494/ to http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/122-1290/3494/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:06, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Katipo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081018060723/http://ento.org.nz/nzentomologist/free_issues/NZEnto06_2_1976/Volume%206-2-204.pdf to http://www.ento.org.nz/nzentomologist/free_issues/NZEnto06_2_1976/Volume%206-2-204.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:20, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: "The first in situ scientific study on New Zealand spiders was published in 1857". https://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/AkEEJ2FinYFp57Di8Mfa/full
I feel this should be included in the article, but am unsure how to stuff it in there in a smooth way. Thoughts?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AxonsArachnida (talk • contribs) 10:43, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first in situ study of an NZ spider 

message: Hello I am a college student in a Behavioral Ecology course taking part in the WikiSpiders project. This article's information is really detailed and informative, but with some easy tweaks, it can be more consistent with the general WikiSpiders Outline. 
Currently the behavior section of the article talks about prey capture techniques and construction of the web. Using the WikiSpiders guidelines, these can both fall under the subcategory of Webs to make a more targeted, delineated page. Both of these pieces of information are quite complex and can be elaborated on in these sections. Similarly, under the reproduction heading there’s a really good paragraph on spider oviposition. To avoid confusion on the classification of this behavior, it should go under a parental care heading. Lastly, the article has a very good breakdown on spider’s bite and its toxicity, but it’s under a toxicology section. Using the WikiSpiders outline, this information should fall under a bite to humans and animals section. Also in this section, authors can elaborate on how these spider bites affect animals. Akwan826 (talk) 03:57, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions from a Behavioral Ecology Student