Talk:Hancock Stadium

message: :Image:Hancock Redesign.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 09:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Hancock Redesign.jpg

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot (talk) 19:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: A user seems determined to have a sentence to the effect of "due to years of ineffective leadership" included in the "History" section of this article.  I have contested that inclusion and have removed the line multiple times.  Now, I'm asking anyone who may view this talk page:
Can you find a reputable source for this statement?  As I have pointed out on the Talk Page of the user, a statement such as that is not only inflammatory, but borderline slander, on top of obviously violating Wikipedia policies on neutrality.  If someone can find a reputable source backing up that line, I would have no problem with its inclusion in this article.
Thanks in advance for any assistance that might be offered!  --InDeBiz1 (talk) 06:03, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE:  "Ineffective Leadership" 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Hancock Stadium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921120434/http://www.goredbirds.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/091713aac.html to http://www.goredbirds.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/091713aac.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120831161206/http://www.goredbirds.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/082912aaa.html to http://www.goredbirds.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/082912aaa.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140210154056/http://www.goredbirds.com/facilities/hancock-stadium.html to http://www.goredbirds.com/facilities/hancock-stadium.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921190912/http://www.goredbirds.com/hancockrenovation/why-build.html to http://www.goredbirds.com/hancockrenovation/why-build.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140210154056/http://www.goredbirds.com/facilities/hancock-stadium.html to http://www.goredbirds.com/facilities/hancock-stadium.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:44, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified