Talk:Iamb (poetry)

message: Examples?
Iambic Trimeter is not 3 consecutive iamb, but rather 3 iambic metra, each of which is 2 iambs, for a total of 6 iambs in each line.
:No.  That is certainly incorrect as far as Accentual-syllabic verse in English is concerned.  It seems there may be a significant distinction between classical metres and English terminology here. Do you have a reference for your assertion? — Stumps 21:44, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it isn't; a trochee (a metrical foot of stressed-unstressed) is the opposite of an iamb (a metrical foot of unstressed-stressed). Thefamouseccles 01:37, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

message: The first foot of the line given from Shakespeare is a trochee. Nobody naturally emphasizes "I" in that sentence in such a manner as to make the foot an iamb.
:Depends on the context.  He could be asking, "Should I do it as opposed to anybody else doing it?" in which case it would be accented.  Tsunomaru 17:31, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The third foot is definitely pyrrhic, though. 163.1.121.50 19:13, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

text: You are right, that would be a condition of stressing the "I," but I think the poem is not arguing who's going to do the job but rather whether the comparision is apt.  The first foot most normally, I agree, is a simple trochaic substitution for the first foot.  Very common substitution, especially as English typically stresses the first syllable of words.  There's no way it turns the entire line into trochees, so I disagree with the parenthetical comments in the artcle at this point.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.211.206.6 (talk) 01:21, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

text: Is this discussion (from six years ago!) related to the parenthetical text questioning the first line of Sonnet 18's status as iambic pentameter? If so, how has it stood for that length of time?! True or not, it's the very soul of original research. I think The Gilly had the right idea: if no-one can find a source, let's just pull the example entirely. Heck, even if someone can find a source, let's pull the example; this article is about iambs, not about things that turn out to not be iambs. -- Perey (talk) 07:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: What is iambic meter?

message: Speaking as someone who wanted to know what iambic meter is, I have to say this article supplies very little actual information that is accessible to someone who doesn't already have an understanding of poetry. It would be far more useful if there was less poet talk and more layman style explanation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.101.209.73 (talk • contribs) 02:04, 23 February 2009 
Agreed.  I'm going to link the 'Pentameter' section to the article on iambic pentameter since that's much beefier.  Also, no examples for hexameter/alexandrine??  The Gilly (talk) 07:03, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very little actual information 

message: When I get around to it I intend to reorganize this material following the model of German Wikipedia model. See my notice at WikiProject Poetry, and further discussion on my talk page, and of course I'd welcome any input/objections. Wareh (talk) 13:47, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed reorganization following German Wikipedia model 

message: The example for the alternative analysis of the Shakespeare line regarding iambic pentameter is from Kiparsky, from a paper either in the 70s or 90s. I'll look it up when I get the chance. The alternative analysis is however not a trochee, but a dactyl. Bot-386 (talk) 19:28, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Pentameter