Talk:NALSAR University of Law

message: I think the second 'critique' has no place in the article. The way it's written makes it seem like this is some sort of third-party criticism, that the college has faced from outsiders. Which is, of course, not true. The article should stick purely to fact. --Necrogen 00:14 hrs 30 December 2005
:The statement of yours is very POV. Third-party criticism is what can be considered to be closer to the truth. But, unless the criticism can be cited and proved, the statement posted has no validity. I am removing the POV part of the article. The first paragraph should not be removed as various magazines like India Today have reported this issue.
:In the future, please cite the links to the relevant articles available on the Internet or other relevant sources. --Andy123 18:50, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism Section

message: Please cite examples and links and authorities as to how NALSAR has excelled in debating and mooting competitions. --Andy123 11:36, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV problems with the '''Extracurricular Activities''' section

message: The second footnote doesn't refer to a ranking. There is no ranking as the college is not compared to any other college. There is no methodology just an assertion. It is hence a poor source from which one could assert that NALSAR is ranked first for the year 2009. It is written for the local Hyderabad edition of the Hindu and hence the study isn't national. It is a description of the college itself. The assertion that NALSAR was ranked 1 in 2009 should be deleted along with the footnote.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.12.251.226 (talk) 03:07, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious ranking article

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Nalsar University of Law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110807224226/http://www.nalsar.ac.in/pg_programme.html to http://www.nalsar.ac.in/pg_programme.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110807220123/http://www.nalsar.ac.in/mphil.html to http://www.nalsar.ac.in/mphil.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110811073305/http://www.nalsar.ac.in/phd_programme.html to http://www.nalsar.ac.in/phd_programme.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130607164227/http://nalsar.ac.in/mba.html to http://www.nalsar.ac.in/mba.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121025160609/http://www.nalsar.ac.in/centers.html to http://www.nalsar.ac.in/centers.html
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130628171953/http://barandbench.com/content/australian-national-university-wins-jessup-moot-court-competition-nalsar-reaches-semi-finals to http://barandbench.com/content/australian-national-university-wins-jessup-moot-court-competition-nalsar-reaches-semi-finals
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120802222204/http://www.icc-trialcompetition.org/cms/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3&Itemid=4 to http://www.icc-trialcompetition.org/cms/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3&Itemid=4
*Added  tag to http://barandbench.com/brief/9/2238/nalsar-wins-willem-c-vis-international-commercial-arbitration-moot-2012
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121025153709/http://www.nalsar.ac.in/achivements.html to http://www.nalsar.ac.in/achivements.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120501041454/http://nalsar.ac.in/publications.html to http://www.nalsar.ac.in/publications.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:09, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: (Added information on undergraduate course) 
(Added cited statement on the prestige of the college to distinguish it from other law schools early on. This is not controversial information.) 
(Added detail of NALSAR being runners up in Vis East 2017.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.83.207.111 (talk) 09:45, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Made a few additions 

message: Keep your paws off, Muhandes. Review carefully. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.83.207.111 (talk) 12:26, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I can guarantee you that name calling and ad hominem attacks are against your cause. See my response from three months ago on some good ideas about how to improve the article. --Muhandes (talk) 21:39, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  EVERYTHING HAS BEEN ACCOMPANIED WITH CITATIONS. 

message: Muhandes (talk)
This is from the Wikipedia page for Harvard Law School: "Founded in 1817, it is the oldest continually-operating law school in the United States and is generally considered to be one of the most prestigious in the world"
Why don't you go delete this on their page and call it "promotion" or whatever? Do you even know anything about Indian law schools? 
Also, you decimated the Moot Court competition section. I have my doubts on whether you even know what that means, let alone know which competitions are prestigious. I advice you to let somebody who is educated enough on Indian law schools to handle this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.83.207.111 (talk) 12:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. We are not talking about another page here, we are talking about this page. I can guarantee you that ad hominem arguments will get you nowhere. On the contrary, even valid arguments which you make may be ignored by the community if you keep addressing me instead of the material. In the moot court section I removed the words "extremely prestigious" and I removed individual ratings which I find redundant. Wikipedia is not a database, we don't just keep any listing of anything. You may take these edits to any board you like, I stand behind them. You seem to know quite a lot about this institute, are you related? --Muhandes (talk) 17:37, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muhandes, again 

message: Added comment on status of the college. Citation: Times of India. Please refer to the Harvard Law School page where there is a similar statement in the intro. The citation there is its own magazine. In that way, we are doing better. Muhandes, if you want to revert this, first go edit the Harvard page and tell them it's "promotion" or whatever.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.83.207.111 (talk) 17:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. We are not talking about another page here, we are talking about this page. Putting this quote in the lead section is undue weight and promotional. You obviously have a conflict of interest if you can't see it. --Muhandes (talk) 17:27, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

text: Just for further reading, WP:PUFFERY, WP:NPOV, WP:LEAD and obviously WP:PROMO are other guidelines which this sentence is against. --Muhandes (talk) 21:33, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: new edit

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.nalsar.ac.in/about-nalsar, https://nalsar.ac.in/nalsar-campus, https://nalsar.ac.in/academic-programmes. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:42, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed