lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Glitiškės

message: "Commanders responsible for murder of civilians in Glitiškės were executed". That's quite interesting and uncommon for that time nad place. Could someone elaborate on this reference and hopefully find some others to confirm this particular piece of information? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 17:15, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the only information I could get so far.. Does anyone know fate of perpetrators of Dubingiai massacre? Sigitas 17:44, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Nothing in my sources so far, but honestly I have not done much searching on the AK-L issue yet.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 19:12, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fate of perpetrators 

message: soldiers interviewed , alert the media. No mention of either location or massacre Elinruby (talk) 06:12, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Elinruby (talk) 06:12, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unused reference
Talk:Active duty

message: There has to be a demarcation between soldiers who are 'on active service' (which in the British army means actually out on operations) and those who are not. There is another class of soldier who is 'on the active list', meaning that he/she is available to be sent out on operations, and one can be removed/retired from the active list but still serve in a non-combatant post. Also the US Army includes all overseas service as Active Service. The categories should be kept clear. Valetude (talk) 18:37, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Active service' means operational service
Talk:List of hospitals in Norway

message: A while ago I made a template of Public Hospital Trusts and State-Run Health Agencies in Norway. I think it is complete, and I've used official English translations.
I suggest that this template should be added to all related articles. Might this article be replaced with the template? 
--WikiOslo 17:17, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: At present this is a list of health trusts (helsefortak), not of hospitals. Most health trusts operate two or more hospitals. This list needs to be expanded considerably to be accurate. Also, it is not concequently using the correct offical English names. Arsenikk 16:02, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hospitals or health trusts
Talk:M.A.R.S. Patrol Total War

message: I remember this comic from when I was a kid, & only managed to buy 3 or 4 issues of the 10: one was set in the arctic & obviously based on the movie "Ice Station Zebra", & another was the one with the female alien spy. I always wondered how this started -- this article provides only a hint -- & how it ended -- which this article doesn't. Was the comic intended to be only 10 issues? If it ended without a resolution, did the creators have any plans for how they wanted to end it? -- llywrch (talk) 07:14, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment
Talk:Cerdotado

message: Spanish removed from main article.  Does someone want to transwiki it?
Español:
El cerdotado es un personaje de cómic creado en Monterrey, México, por Polo Jasso.
Su padre fue El Primer Cerdotado, el cual fue "enchorizado" en su primera misión.
El Primer Cerdotado apareció en la revista de la Facultad de Artes Visuales de la UANL.
El Hijo del Cerdotado, Anacleto Kalel Pacheco, aparece en su tira cómica diaria que se publica en el periódico Milenio Diario en México y Monterrey.
Poderes:
Tiene fuerza de superhéroe, invulnerable a las balas y explosiones. Es capaz de volar, pero lo marean las alturas. Posee mocos radioactivos.
Debilidades:
Es fácilmente corruptible, y se deprime de vez en cuando. Adicto a la pornografía.
Aliados:
El Kitapón, El Omnipresente buitre, El Negro Llorarás
Enemigos:
El Conejo Mariguano, El Malandro, La Ladrona Encuerada, Elmo Jones
I fear the pun on Cerdotado might be lost in translation. In spanish ser dotado means gifted being, but Cerdotado would mean gifted pig. He reminds me a lot of Squigley from Sinfest.
--189.157.192.232 07:03, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:James Waller

message: There is a disambiguation with the Dr James Waller mentioned on this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greensboro_Massacre 80.202.93.131 17:23, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also the Irish architect James H deW Waller - http://archive.irishartsreview.com/irisartsreviyear/pdf/1996/20492895.pdf.bannered.pdf  who reinvented the ctesiphon arch.78.16.126.83 (talk) 10:46, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:T.H.U.N.D.E.R. Agents

message: And no one came with a Doom Patrol reference to this?? I've never heard of these characters before, but the minute I read the descriptions of the first members of the team, Mento and Robotman came to mind. Niles Caulder never used a "thunder belt", but he built a lot of stuff and this could be one of them (and the whole Dynamo thing rings a bell and I don't know where exactly - maybe the JLU's Justice Guild).
Also, Menthor was killed and, it's not mentioned, but Lightning's abilities might resemble Negative Man's.
That's right  Hocky bbbby s llabh (talk) 14:32, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There seems to be a lot of confusion in this article (and in general) about whether the characters are indeed in the public domain. This article states firmly that Carbonaro lost his claim, and then a couple of paragraphs down says that DC was working under a license from Carbonaro. Obviously, if the characters are in public domain, there's no good reason why DC would require a license from Carbonaro, since the latter would not be owner of the characters. Meanwhile, on the thunderagents.com website (used as a reference here), they state exactly the opposite- that Carbonaro won his suit and has valid claim on the characters (or rather, had, as he passed away.) Which is it? ChrisStansfield Contribs 08:21, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public Domain or not? 

message: It's missing the entirety of the IDW titles, and the information on the DC series is either incomplete, or deliberately misleading. I'm not sure which. Mind if I take a stab at it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:E340:B440:C0F0:EC6A:49B0:1EE1 (talk) 09:13, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is a mess
Talk:Uki goshi

message: Please see my  discussion on my first technique page attempt,
Kata Guruma. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pereza (talk • contribs) 17:25, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Done. --Nightshadow28 14:47, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese script
Talk:O goshi

message: Please see my  discussion on my first technique page attempt,
Kata Guruma. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pereza (talk • contribs) 17:25, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New section

message: Done. --Nightshadow28 13:22, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese script
Talk:Accolade (company)

message: Lot of mentions about developing in this article - look through the linked game articles and it seems the developer was someone else. Smells like too much development credit is going to Accolade in this article.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.243.178.205 (talk) 21:53, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Too much focus on "developer"

message: This article has gone through several name changes, but the last one, to "Accolade (developer)", seems inappropriate.  While Accolade was a video game developer, they were primarily a publisher.  Near the end of their existence, very few of their games were developed internally.  Also, being labeled a developer implies that they developed games for other publishers, which they never did.  Therefore, I propose that we rename this article to "Accolade (publisher)".  Any objections? — Frecklefσσt | Talk 12:54, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ha-ha, you truly are the only one with this page in watchlist. To be honest, this is exactly the kind of thing a development task force would be responsible for. Currently there are randomly assigned "(company)" "(game company)" "(game developer)" "(developer)" tags. I would argue developers-only are (game developer); publishers-only are "(game publisher)"; mix of both are "(game company)"; mix with other disciplines/industries are (company). This preserves both precision, unambiguous naming and hierarchy.—  H3llkn0wz  ▎talk  16:37, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, my comment was almost two years old.  I wouldn't mind "Accolade (game company)", but the current title is just wrong.  — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 18:26, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I support the move. Unless you propose a move or otherwise put the discussion outside this talk page, I do not think there will much more response.—  H3llkn0wz  ▎talk  19:09, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

text: I finally got around to moving it. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 12:41, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accolade (developer)? 
Talk:Bronze corydoras

message: are fish eggs Egg (biology) or ovum? Jon513 17:31, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say Egg (biology) (see link) Neil916 20:08, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

message: "...d individuals, although some breeders report that the fry are a little slower to develop.[citation needed] Others say that the albinos are practically blind and that the males are somewhat sterile, although this may be due to extensive inbreeding.[citation needed] Albino bronze corys are frequently injected with bright dye (via a needle) and sold in aquariums. This controversial practice is known as "painting" or "juicing" fish.[citation needed]."
#The last two sentences do not pertain to the albino Cory's, and I believe they should be moved elsewhere on the page. 169.235.16.14 (talk) 02:37, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Last paragraph on albino Cory

message: Is it permissible to embed youtube videos onto either a talk page or the main article? I own a video of a Bronze corydora, after being gently touched, lifting it's dorsal spines.Jourdy288 (talk) 21:21, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, Wikipedia article doesn't have embedded videos. It's interesting, but it's not part of an article. Maybe wikipedia will become multimedia one day...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.91.248.85 (talk) 10:39, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Youtube videos? 
Talk:The Saint and the Fiction Makers

message: Fleming Lee might be a pseudonym used by Leslie Charteris as another in-joke. It seems to mock Ian Fleming and mention his Eurasian heritage at the same time.Hotspur23 13:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, according to Burl Barer's book, Fleming Lee was a different person who had worked on some of the French novels and the comic strip. Barer's discussion of the unpublished work Bet on the Saint pretty much confirms that Lee is a different person from Charteris. I don't realy see it as mocking Ian Fleming. 23skidoo 16:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Mike Eddy

message: I removed him from WikiProject NASCAR since he had no NASCAR starts. Royalbroil 03:33, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal from WikiProject NASCAR
Talk:Armaan (1966 film)

message: This movie is not a part of Indian Cinema it is a part of Pakistani Cinema!--72.83.0.57 23:58, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Baaghi (2000 film)

message: The film's DVD cover here lists Manisha Koirala before Aditya Pancholi. See the guidelines at Template:Infobox_film#TemplateData for further understanding.- Managerarc™ talk 15:46, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Credits

message: The new version of the film stars tiger Shroff, son of Jackie Shroff  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tverskyfan100 (talk • contribs) 11:44, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actors
Talk:Llywelyn

message: i always thought llewellyn meens lionsoul (llew =lion and ellyn= soul)
:But the name is very old, and I don't think lions lived in Wales in the middle ages. Neil ╦ 14:41, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin 

message: Llewellyn includes "Llewellyn Publications". Would it be ok to change that to "Llewellyn Worldwide"? (since "Llewellyn Worldwide" is company name used at llewellyn.com) --EarthFurst 23:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, good catch. I haven't started that article yet, but LP can just be a redirect. -- nae'blis 19:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worldwide? 

message: The content of this article is reproduced in Llywelyn.  Since the latter form is used throughout this article (which calls Llewellyn a bastardisation!) and since that is also the form used by the majority of individuals linked to in this article, I suggest making this article a redirect. garik 18:20, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Llewellyn versus Llewelyn
Talk:Back to Mine: Pet Shop Boys

message: Is it actualy the unique 2CDs set in the serie?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.245.156.14 (talk) 20:34, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double
Talk:Gold-plating (EU law)

message: U.S. Government- The tendency of Pentagon officials to ask weapons contractors to meet excessively high requirements.
What does this mean? And why is it part of the links section?
:I have removed it. May just be a casual term. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:39, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Revision 695479422 changed "there are the few companies that stand to benefit from it." to "but there are the few companies that can from it benefit."
There are some things about the new wording that I liked ("that stand to" seems too colloquial somehow, so the revision was better) but I reverted it because the rewording (to prevent ending with a preposition) really grated when I read it. Explaining myself here in the hopes of avoiding a grammar edit war. Hopefully we can hash out any differing opinions here. greymullet (talk) 14:18, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ending with a preposition 
Talk:List of secretaries general of OPEC

message: Check this out: List_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States
Awesome format.  I don't have time to implement a similar format here, today.  If anyone else does, that'd be awesome. MrZaiustalk 17:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Addressed in the current version. —Patrug (talk) 12:13, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Templates

message: Is it possible we could get some sources for this info? Not trying to be rude, but this page has none.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.254.31.220 (talk) 20:12, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Addressed in the current version. —Patrug (talk) 12:13, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: The 1970 Secretary General of OPEC was Libya's Omar el-Badri (1937–2010), and the long-serving current Secretary General is Libya's Abdallah Salem el-Badri (born 1940). OPEC seems to have maintained a careful silence about any family connection between these two el-Badri leaders from Libya. Can anyone find a reliable reference stating whether the two men were brothers, half-brothers, cousins, or maybe not known relations? —Patrug (talk) 12:13, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Omar & Abdallah el-Badri
Talk:Chitchor

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 19:34, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 
Talk:Jim Lampley

message: The recent listing in the Jime Rome category is there because I heard it when the newest list was released. Don't edit the last sentence of highlightsSoxrock 17:50, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed material from  that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.
Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--Docg 08:31, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The information had been cited but the references got lost somewhere in the numerous edits from early April. I have copy&pasted a previous, cited version into the article. -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 11:20, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent developements  
Talk:Henry F. Phillips

message: ----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.150.233.59 (talk) 19:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

message: Just watched modern marvels and the correct name is Henry P. Phillips, didnt know how to change the title so!
I would be interested to see a photograph of Mr Phillips. He must of had a very intereting cranial structure.
:So, is it Henry P. or Henry F.?  I find conflicting accounts on the internet.  The Phillips Screw company themselves call him Henry F. Phillips. http://www.phillips-screw.com/About.htm .  Most sources seem to call him Henry F. (but most are originally based on this very article, so the reasoning is circular). Opentopia, and apparently Modern Marvels, differ, but I think they are probably wrong.  Sources would be nice, if anyone has them.Novel-Technology 02:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have the death certificate. It says F.  I believe his son's middle name was Frank.Fotoguzzi (talk) 03:13, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Perhaps he didn't invent it. . . 
There is a Frearson also connected with it: "Thompson was beat out by the English inventor John Frearson some six years prior."
source: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/every-yes-another-question-vonnie-lea-/ 
It looks like a variation: http://progress-is-fine.blogspot.com/2012/11/vanished-tool-makes-reed-princefrearson.html   -- Steve --  (talk) 03:40, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inventor May Need More Research 

message: what exactly are diameters of the various phillips screw sizes?--Philo  20:16, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sizes 

message: www.google.com/patents/US1908080
www.google.com/patents/US1908081
While these may not be considered secondary sources, do not they seem to show an earlier relationship between Thompson and Phillips? Was the Phillips Screw Company formed after, for example, Phillips agreed to finance the process of obtaining the patent? I do not know what the real story is, but to me, it is not the story found in the current article.Fotoguzzi (talk) 18:25, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Thompson and Phillips
Talk:Star Wars: Republic

message: I came to this article from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Wreck: In the Pirkinning. I don't see any problem with articles about Star Wars comic books, but I am amazed that someone actually went to the trouble of creating an article for every single issue of it. JIP | Talk 17:51, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Every Single Issue? 

message: The merging of the individual articles into story arcs in this series has been completed. —Skope (talk) 16:26, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  MassMerge Complete 

message: I removed the "When They Were Brothers" story arc.  The story doesn't appear to be part of the Star Wars: Republic series of issues. Noca2plus (talk) 20:22, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If this story is a limited series tie-in that is truly associated with Star Wars: Republic, then perhaps it could be included in a new "Limited Series" section on this page. Noca2plus (talk) 20:25, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed "When They Were Brothers"
Talk:Panjandrum

message: Before the start of the calculations, I was sure that cheaper and more profitable with the position of the thrust would be to put the entire powder charge in the center of the wheel, we only provide horizontal thrust. I was sure of it.
But remembering the course of secondary educational school , the theorems of sines and cosines, the formula of reduction of corners, I got a General formula for calculating the moment of force applied NOT TO the CENTER BUT TO the SUPPORT, for any number of engines. As the value of the force and the radius for the theory doesn't matter, I got the ratio of the angle to the horizon for each engine. 
It is simple: Moment=force*radius*(1+sin α).
The angle for the first engine : α=0+0*360/n
The angle for the second engine : α=0+1*360/n
The angle for the third engine : α=0+2*360/n
For Excel : α0=0, α1=α0+360/n, α2=α1+360/n, ... :)
Sin(α*(2*PI/360))
It remains only to choose the number of engines and summarize the results. 
The result was for me unexpected: No difference between just placing the powder charge in the center or on the rim -- no. 
The moments are conditionally divided in pairs through the centre. The sum of these pairs is equal to 2.
The sum of the moments is the same in both cases and equal to the number of solid rocket motors. 
So in the end, what we get in these calculations ? 
It seems to me that in the movable, horizontal center, you can fit more powder charge for traction. It is very good that a good German engineers do not put their efforts to this page of history.  Seregadushka (talk • contribs) 18:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calculation 

message: Somebody has objected to my replacement of "careen" by "career" in the article. Quoting the text:
"...the rockets on the right wheel failed and the weapon careened off course."
Referring to Wiktionary:
 Careen:
 1. (nautical, transitive) To heave a ship down on one side so as to expose the other, in order to clean it of barnacles and weed, or to repair it below the water line.
 2. (nautical, intransitive) To tilt on one side.
 3. To lurch or sway violently from side to side.
 4. To tilt or lean while in motion. [from late 19th c.]
 ...
 Usage notes
 The "move rapidly" senses are considered by some, especially in British English, to be an error due to confusion with "career". 
 Career:
 To move rapidly straight ahead, especially in an uncontrolled way.
   The car careered down the road, missed the curve, and went through a hedge.
And I'd emphasise that the event discussed was in the UK, so British usage is appropriate.
However I have no intention of getting into a dispute with somebody convinced that he knows better. MarkMLl (talk) 19:24, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: You just proved that it should be careen. It swerved all over the place (careen) not just went straight at full speed (career). (Hohum @) 21:17, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Careen vs career.
Talk:List of amphibians of Minnesota

message: I was surprised to see toads listed in a separate section. Because toads (Bufonidae) are one of several families of frogs (Anura), I would suggest renaming this section 'Frogs and Toads' and adding the 3rd table to the 2nd. It is organized this way on many other pages (e.g. Alabama, Florida, Texas).
Andrew M. Durso (talk) 15:27, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toads are frogs
Talk:John Rolle, 1st Baron Rolle

message: A source is an obituary: Obituary: John Rolle Gentleman's Magazine August 1841 -- but the year of birth in the body of the article in 1842. Which is right?--CaroleHenson (talk) 01:07, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death 

message: In the article his year of birth is given as 1750 and so he should have been 88 at the Queen's coronation, not 82 as formerly given in the text. I corrected that. --Maxl (talk) 11:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age at Queen Victoria's coronation.
Talk:Suhasini Mulay

message: The link to ramnagari takes you to a village in Nepal. That is incorrect in the context of the subject matter. Ramnagari as regards to Suhasini Mulay is a Marathi language Movie in which she had acted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.109.102.123 (talk) 09:20, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Ramnagari