Talk:24 season 1

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
# Support.  Nominator.  --Serge 23:04, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: # Support.  Nominator.  --Serge 23:04, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move

message: # Oppose It's not an official name and requires extensive knowledge of the 24 TV series to understand that it's a season of this TV series. Introduces unnecessary amount of required understanding to the article title and you could even say it's 24-slang. WP:TV-NC currently has the season naming guideline under reconsideration (because (season 2) is normally used for dab). There are several other forms of advised article naming under consideration atm, but nothing has been decided. TheDJ (talk • contribs • WikiProject Television) 01:52, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in opposition to the move

message: I added pages for all 24 episodes of season 1 with brief description. I also deleted the individual episode summaries on the main page because they are no longer needed and it makes the main page shorter and more organized. It would be nice if someone made the summaries on each page a little longer. Thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hietanbs (talk • contribs) 20:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode Pages 

message: I've rated this article as start class because it contains most of the important information about the subject but contains no inline citations. I've rated it as low importance to wikiproject television as series articles are of comparitively low importance compared to article about entire shows.--Opark 77 21:11, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment rating

message: I put a trivia tag and an unencyclopedic tag on the bottom sections. Trivia, if relevant should be merged into appropriate sections and written as prose. See WP:AVTRIV. Goofs are unencyclopedic in general, even more so when they are not sourced. These need to be removed completely, the same goes for the other seasons. The idea behind them tends to fall in with what "trivia" is. If you wish to keep the information, I suggest transwikiing it to a 24 Wikia (if one exists..if not, then create one).   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 15:34, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent tags 

message: This does not seem to be going any further, so we should close it. --Jack Merridew 14:52, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree. No discussion in a week. Time to close. I  (said) (did) 17:33, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I've removed the screenshots, too: diff. They can easily be restored. --Jack Merridew 11:22, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motion to close 

message: :Image:24Day1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 14:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:24Day1.jpg

message: :Image:24-cast-season1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:31, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:24-cast-season1.jpg

message: I don't think that we need a link for Operation Nightfall, because if you click it, choose between the Star Wars or 24 Link, it just redirects you back to 24 Season 1, where you just were.  What's the purpose?  Or it would be cool to have a page actually about the episode instead of just a redirect. Mr. moose (talk) 16:07, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Both links removed, amended to body text. Julianhall (talk) 18:36, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation Nightfall Link 

message: There is no WORD about Serbia, Kosovo or Belgrade, but THEY did it all...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.0.154.140 (talk) 22:42, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  SERBIAN PEOPLE!!