lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Śrāvakayāna

message: this article ascribes the term sravakabuddha to Mahayana, but no source is cited. Peter jackson 09:52, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

message: How is it pronounced? --Diggindeeper (talk) 14:39, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: In a Theravadin context, the Śrāvakayāna is said to lead to Śrāvakabuddha-hood. In that context, Śrāvakabuddhas are not able to be the first in their age to turn the wheel of Dharma.
I rewrote this entire section (obviously written by someone more familiar with the later Mahayana or Vajrayana traditions) as in early Buddhist schools there is never a focus on the notion of 'an age', being 'first to turn the wheel of Dharma' in an age, and the term 'Śrāvakabuddha' is apparently not even used. prat (talk) 09:30, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: If I understand it correctly, the sravakabuddha concept only exists in late Theravadin commentaries. However, these doctrines, which were never in mainstream Theravada, Mahayana, or Vajrayana teachings, have been widely circulated. For my own part, I have never seen the term sravakabuddha in Mahayana or Vajrayana texts or doctrines, or ever discussed in other schools of Buddhism than Theravada. In Mahayana and Vajrayana traditions, one who succeeds in the path of a sravaka is always called an arhat. If my understanding is correct, in Mahayana teachings, arhats have a certain type of liberation and Nirvana (with remainder), but they do not turn the Dharmacakra as Gautama Buddha did. Again, this is the Mahayana view, and the Theravada interpretations may not necessarily agree with each point. Tengu800 11:45, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 'In the Theravada School' section
Talk:Alecia Elliott

message: There is a June 2010 blog post (see link below) that says that Elliott is no longer a singer and that she now lives in Baytown, Texas (a small city in Harris County, near Houston).
http://cmatalk.net/alecia-elliott-is-alive/
Reasonably speaking this is not a cite-worthy source, but it might be useful info for editors in future. 
72.82.183.42 (talk) 10:50, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Where Is She Now?
Talk:Alex Buzbee

message: The link to Buzbee's Redskins profile no longer works. Pox202 (talk) 04:20, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken link
Talk:Nikkō Shōnin

message: I removed the part saying Nikko protected the Dai-Gohonzon. There was no citation given, it was written as fact, and the Dai-Gohonzon is disputed. Steve (talk) 21:17, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dai-Gohonzon

message: This article is heavely if not completely biased by Nichiren Shoshu views. It is important to note that Nikko is not the founder of Nichiren Shoshu only but also of two other separate schools of Nichiren Buddhism and of the Nikko linages within Nichiren Shu. The whole article should be rewritten to be more objective and accurate towards historical facts. Gonzalopena25 (talk) 04:01, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: There aren't a lot of people working on these articles, and there are some obvious problems with lack of expertise and non-native English with the existing texts. Perhaps there is less of a problem with bias than there is with just a lack of people volunteering to do this work. PeepleLikeYou (talk) 23:45, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Article is biased  

message: In the text the title 上人 is omitted from the Japanese text for some reason, won't this confuse people? PeepleLikeYou (talk) 12:32, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why omit the kanji for shonin? 

message: Regarding this edit conflict:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nikk%C5%8D_Sh%C5%8Dnin&curid=526131&diff=925932705&oldid=925903284
I don't offer an opinion on which version is better factually, but could you please at least write correct English?
Thanks. PeepleLikeYou (talk) 23:51, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody else seems to care about this so I've reverted to the last version to be written in grammatical English. PeepleLikeYou (talk) 13:33, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please at least write correct English
Talk:Buttress thread

message: This sure looks like the same text as  -- which one is the original and which is the copy? Paul Koning 21:51, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Rewritten to avoid the problem. Paul Koning 15:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this copied? 

message: In machine tool usage, buttress thread is triangular, with one face perpendicular to the centerline and the other face slanted at 45 degrees.  Its purpose is not to create a seal, but rather to transmit force in one direction only.  It is stronger than square thread of the same size (but square thread works in both directions). Paul Koning 21:51, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Rewritten to add this aspect.  It needs work but this is a start. Paul Koning 15:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm a little confused. Is the oil field type of buttress thread trapezoidal or square in shape, while the machine type is triangular (like a saw tooth)? If this is correct, meaning they are two entirely different threads that are not really related in shape, I would suggest splitting the two into different articles. Sauer202 (talk) 22:49, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple meanings 

message: A citation is not required here, and would probably not explain the reasoning behind the original editors upload. All that is required is to look closely at the thread form (I suggest starting with the Simple Buttress form) and do the maths.
In the thread form shown 2 x f = 33% of the pitch, leaving the thread base at 66% of pitch. In a square thread form the thread base is never greater than 50% pitch. So, ... in any given size and material strength, the Simple Buttress thread form is 33% stronger than a simple square thread and possibly up to 50% stronger depending upon the f criteria used.
Citations are not an adequate alternative to going back to first principles and doing one's own thinking. George.Hutchinson (talk) 11:11, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation required removal 

message: I have added a paragraph about the possibility of such things. having seen one a long time ago. It was a woodworking device, probably just a clamp, and the buttress screw could be physically lifted out of a half nut to disengage it. But a Googling session failed to turn up an example so I can't finish the job properly. If anyone can find an example, please feel free to add a link or whatever. Thanks.
Tiger99 (talk) 15:04, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick release vice 

message: This article appears to discuss two different types of threads that are not really related in shape nor use. I suggest splitting the two into different articles. One is basically a sawtooth profile, while the other is a tapered ACME thread. Sauer202 (talk) 10:33, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested split
Talk:Greg Macpherson

message: * Blogs are generally not acceptable as citations; see WP:V
* Drawing a conclusion from a source must be consistent with all major points of view; see WP:NPOV
* Editors who are involved with a political campaign should familiarize themselves with WP:COI; disclosing your role, and running edits by the talk page, are key to contributing to related articles.
-Pete (talk) 08:29, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes on my [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Greg_Macpherson&diff=188113229&oldid=188111653 reversion] 

message: I pulled a BLP violation without making this statement but just made my second fourth edit and thought I should acknowledge that Greg Macpherson is my second cousin. We're nodding family acquaintances, not close friends. —Tim Davenport, Corvallis, OR /// Carrite (talk) 17:21, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Pro-forma COI statement
Talk:Alex Nesovic

message: It's literally one sentence.  Why is this person notable?  How do they meet the criteria of significant coverage? I can only imagine it's here because it was created many years ago when the wikipedia rules must have been more lax?  There is only one reference and it's a list. I wouldn't consider it to be a reliable, secondary source. I don't see significant coverage, I don't see why this person is notable. BlakesMa (talk) 23:53, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is this an article?
Talk:Chin Kung

message: Shouldn't this be moved back to Chin Kung? /Ninly (talk) 23:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of title in article name

message: I deleted this part of the text, because of its anti-Mahayana bias: 
Ironically, the Pure Land tradition from which Chin Kung hails, as a branch of Mahayana tradition is arguably fairly distant from Shakyamuni's original teachings. . .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:603:1300:6830:8DBA:22E0:45E4:1DA6 (talk) 03:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-Mahayana bias... 
Talk:Alex Schoenbaum

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.jewsinsports.org/profile.asp?sport=football&ID=230. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:30, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Book of Joshua (Samaritan)

message: In this article in the ZDMG the author states that the original is Hebrew. He bought two scrolls of it copied for him by two different Samaritan in Nablus. http://www.archive.org/stream/zeitschrift62deutuoft/zeitschrift62deutuoft_djvu.txt
Why is it not mentioned? Has it been discredited? --188.106.113.177 (talk) 22:49, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hebrew original
Talk:Data collection

message: The page structure could be improved, here is an example of the table of content:
1. Definition (or brief, or history)
2. Types (i.e. quantitative, qualitative, ..)
3. Methods (i.e. Surveys, interviews and focus groups, ..)
4. Tools (i.e. Papers, Automated Systems, Text Messages, Open Data Kit, ..)
5. Issues (i.e. Security, Privacy, ..)
6. Examples
Shoully (talk) 16:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better Structure 

message: This page currently defines data collection within a fairly narrow context. The term is used much more broadly. See for example the range of articles classified under :Category:Data collection --RichardVeryard 22:05, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with him. In my opinion it should either be renamed to "Data collection (statistics)", or whatever field it fits in, either made a new lead section that covers all fields, and put the current content into one section. --ANDROBETA 08:42, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

text: Yes, I came to this discussion about this issue. I am reluctant to edit, and a little busy at the moment, but if I get a minute I will come back and try to craft some language to put this definition in context of the broader definition. I'm afraid of opening a can of worms. Really the whole article needs revision. Or perhaps there is a broader discussion of scientific data collection which this could link to. I will check on that.  --rdelwicheRdelwiche (talk) 05:53, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Narrow context 

message: "Data collection is a term used to describe a process of having"
I have never heard the above used to describe the data-collection process in textbooks before.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karlh21 (talk • contribs) 09:44, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just reverted that vandalism from yesterday. Thanks for pointing it out - feel free to fix such things yourself. Qwfp (talk) 18:54, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description of data 

message: The impact of draught in the sekhukhune area, Leeuwfontein  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.245.120.131 (talk) 07:38, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography
Talk:American Megafauna

message: I am not sure that this game passes notability. It may be simply that there are not the online sources and the lack of structure of the article makes it difficult to spot the originality.
Tetron76 (talk) 10:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: :The next projected title in the series, Bios: Genesis (abiogenisis, the origins of life on Earth) is scheduled for a 2012 or 2013 release.
It's already 2014. Was the game released or was it not? JIP | Talk 08:03, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New release
Talk:Alfred Apaka

message: I have corrected his birthname.  The link where it said his birthname was Afat was a dead link.  I've checked all available sources, and ALL of them say he was born Apaka.  That includes the link I gave, which was Kamehameha Schools profile of his Hānai aunt. — Maile  (talk) 19:13, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth name was Alfred Aholo Apaka, Jr.
Talk:List of Gnostic texts

message: Some lists of books have been added to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. You can find the discussions here. RockMagnetist (talk) 22:25, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The previous comment says "You can find the discussions here." However, I don't find anything there.  I get an error message if I click on the word "here". Mksword (talk) 19:39, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alert: lists of publications in Articles for deletion 

message: Why is it that, in this article, the titles of the Gnostic books are shown in italics, but the same titles are not in italics in the Wikipedia articles on those books? For example, "Acts of Thomas" is shown here in italics, but it's not in italics in the Acts of Thomas article. Mksword (talk) 19:34, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italicization of the titles of these works 

message: Many texts can be quoted from these categories: https://gnosis.study/tags/%D0%A8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B0%20%D0%92%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0 , https://gnosis.study/tags/%D0%92%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B4 , https://gnosis.study/tags/%D0%95%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B3%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B5%20%D0%BE%D1%82%20%D0%9C%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BA%D0%B0 , https://gnosis.study/tags/%D0%92%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD , https://gnosis.study/tags/%D0%9C%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BE%D0%BD , https://gnosis.study/tags/%D0%91%D0%B8%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%B0%20%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B3-%D0%A5%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8 , https://gnosis.study/tags/+%20%D0%95%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B3%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B5%20%D0%98%D1%83%D0%B4%D1%8B , https://gnosis.study/tags/%D0%98%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%8F%20%D1%85%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B0 , https://gnosis.study/tags/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%8B , https://gnosis.study/tags/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BF%D1%82%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9%20%D1%8F%D0%B7%D1%8B%D0%BA , https://gnosis.study/tags/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%B8%D1%8F . They can be quoted in article to make it more complete.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.222.98.48 (talk) 20:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Many texts
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Xirrus

message: KEEP:  As a long time member of the high tech community, I'm interested in the history of current, past and future of any business pushing the edge of capabilities.  The obvious protagonists have nothing to gain unless they’ve got a reason to exclude history.  Obvious similarities exist with Digital Research (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Research), Data General (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_General). Lotus Development (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lotus_Development), VisiCorp (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VisiCorp), ….do I really need to go on?  Since when are points of fact treated with low regard?  Shame on revisionist history writers – maybe some day you’ll find your history being deleted! 155.226.255.42 22:17, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Huntington, North Yorkshire

message: How far is Huntington from the centre of York? --Oldontarian (talk) 10:01, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distance 

message: Aaron Greenwood  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daviessusan634 (talk • contribs) 19:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable People
Talk:Alfred Sully

message: The article synopsis includes the line "He was also a noted actor, having acted in the very same play that Lincoln went to see shortly before his death." The citation includes no mention that Alfred Sully was an actor. What is the citation for this? An hasty search of references do not include this claim. KVJackson (talk) 17:34, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Added a citation needed span tag to the questioned statement about acting. After sufficient review time, absent additional credible information, this sentence should be removed. KVJackson (talk) 19:02, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

text: Upon further review, noted that Deah1919 (currently permanently blocked for vandalism) made the revision as of 23:28, 18 June 2014. Have reverted back to the previous language validated by reference citations, that Alfred Sully was a noted painter. It is somewhat disappointing that this apparent act of page vandalism was in place for over six years. KVJackson (talk) 20:20, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Actor??

message: The article says nothing at all about the circumstances of his death -- a glaring deficiency, I'd say. Cgingold (talk) 15:21, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Death??

message: "I don't believe Alfred Sully could have married a daughte of Saswe, beause his daughter, Mary    married Phillip Deloria, making her a daughter in law to Saswe. I would like to talk to who ever posted this and learn the soucre of his info. Thanks"
This was posted by unknown user in the article, but it is a question of some interest V. Joe (talk) 14:58, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Misplaced Question
Talk:List of streets and squares in Dublin

message: Malahide Road is missing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.40.187.93 (talk) 14:06, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Hi everyone. I have just had the most bracing whirl around the alleyways and byways of the fair city of Dublin, as represented here in our noble online edifice. I discovered something to my chagrin; most entries on Dublin streets do not have the relevant navboxes for that topic, as shown below! I'd finish the work meself, but aye I'm famished. hand me that flagon of ale, will ye? that'll do nicely. thank ye!!  
cheers! --Sm8900 (talk) 13:54, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Need some main navboxes added to entries for Dublin streets
Talk:Alice Drummond

message: She's mentioned as having guest starred on this show but her IMDb credits do not list any such appearance and the only mentions (via internet searches) of her having a role on this show seem to be copied from the line in her article here. Is this a case of mistaken identity? I didn't want to presume and edit out the information but currently it doesn't appear to be correct (or rather verifiable). --99.186.110.193 (talk) 10:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Yes Dear

message: Why is she listed as active until 2016, when her last role was in 2011?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:AA1F:E400:65CA:1038:DC83:2A1 (talk) 23:13, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: . — Wyliepedia 23:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Years active
Talk:The Edgewater (Seattle)

message: More sources worth mining, I haven't had time yet: http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19931213&slug=1736823 and especially http://seattlepi.com/archives/1988/8801010022.asp. - Jmabel | Talk 06:30, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More sources worth mining
Talk:Cravens

message: dup article Widefox; talk 00:17, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Craven Brothers]]
Talk:Allen Lawrence Pope

message: Can someone tell me why is this biography in the "American People Convicted of Murder" page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.73.138.218 (talk) 17:18, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I reverted [edit] by Dr. John W. Stolk (talk) for the following reasons:
* It is a direct copy/paste from History of West Papua
* It is a copy/paste from the article view of History of West Papua, not the source, so it loses all formatting and particularly loses the citations
* The text is not relevant to the subject of this article, namely Allen Pope (or, if the information contained in the text is relevant to Allen Pope -- and I can see ways in which it could be -- the information should be trimmed down and rewritten so that it's clear why it is relevant to Allen Pope, not only copy/pasted). --rahaeli (talk) 13:18, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removal of large chunk of text copied from other article 

message: I found a FindAGrave page for Pope that says he died in 2020, but I can't find anything more reliable. 
https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/228742264/allen-lawrence-pope
Skycloud86 (talk) 11:19, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that the death was unannounced. Not just that, but this seems to be only known information regarding his death. I think Find A Grave website is reliable when it comes to deaths relating to people living in USA, so I'm adding this info. MarioJump83 (talk) 00:52, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Seems to have died in 2020
Talk:Kremlin (board game)

message: that's odd - the base game was (non-specifically) post-Stalin.  however, the expansion explicitly took place as Lenin fell ill and used historical names and faces.  unfortunately i can't find any pre-1990 award list to clarify. TheNuszAbides (talk) 18:46, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Covering 1900-1946?