Talk:Banksia violacea

message: Wanna pic of a cone? I an upload one later. Remind me on my talk page if you don't see one in a few days cheers,  Cas Liber | talk  |  contribs 03:32, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes please. Hesperian 03:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

text: ex.cellent. Hesperian 11:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've stuck them in. They're not in particularly sensible locations, but at least they are spread around and give the article a bit of colour. Hesperian 11:23, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  image of woody cone? 

message: To avoid clogging up the FAC page, here are some detailed comments:
;Lead
*Infobox: what does "unranked" mean? This is just my own curiosity
::See para 4 of Angiosperms#History_of_classification - bit of a headache currently. We really wouldn't noramlly use unranked clades but Angiosperm is like, really notable. Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:29, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It means the follicle essentially - linked Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:25, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: the follicles. clarified Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:15, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

text: No, no,  I agree with that. Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:13, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

text: done. Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:13, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

text: Removed Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:18, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

text: done Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:13, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

text: yes. done Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:13, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

text: yes. done Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:13, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

text: added date of act. Thes taxa are montiored continuously, and I am thinking would only get a date as such if classed as "threatened" etc., not in the negative. Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:31, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

text: removed Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:25, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

text: "'generally Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:25, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

text: twaeked Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:25, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

text: got 'em Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:25, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

text: got 'em Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:25, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

text: got it Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:25, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

text: Tricky for this species without veering into OR. There is nothing specific to add apart from being in a hotspot for biodiversity of banksia. I will look up some material to see what i can add. Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:29, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

text: aha, I had been turning them into inline references asI was using them. Removed empty section heading Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:33, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAC commentary 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Banksia violacea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110305014152/http://environment.gov.au/biodiversity/invasive/publications/pubs/appendix4.pdf to http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/invasive/publications/pubs/appendix4.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:33, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified