Talk:Royal Military Police

message: I have just completed a Phase 1 copy edit and restructure per WP:MOS I have yet to run the the Article through WP:AWB for error checking and fixes but will do so shortly.
The History section is still too long, if anyone can constructively condense it, that would be helpful. Phase 2 copy will follow when I have more time. Pol430 (talk) 14:13, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: * It might be an idea to move the history section to a separate article, retaining only a summary on this article. The present history section is disproportionately large. The present size of the overall article is too large. I would be interested to hear the fellings of others, please discuss below. Pol430 (talk) 19:26, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: November 2010 Cleanup

message: I have removed the text that claims RMP are attested as special constables on the Falklands Islands because this source seems to indicate that this practice ceased when the Falklands Islands Police Force was established; however, RMP do still have powers over civilians subject to service discipline per the Armed Forces Act 2006 and this has been reflected in the the relevant body text. Pol430 talk to me 12:17, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless there's something I've missed (and even if I have), that came across as unnecessarily uncivil. He is free to challenge and remove an unsourced statement; that he also gave an explanation for why he removed it is a bonus and should not be attacked. ninety:one   01:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I am not a user of "practical airsoft"?! Pol430 did a good job of adding references, there is no need to criticise him. And it is not a pre-requisite of editing a Wikipedia article that you must have "real life experience". I think that is enough now, I don't want to have an argument here. ninety:one   23:44, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  February 2011 

message: Removed the unsourced tag after several reflinks have been added, this article has more reflinks than most wiki articles that don't have as many reflinks Pandaplodder (talk) 13:36, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: April 2011

message: This article did not acknowledge the fact the RMP became part of the Adjutant General's Corps in 1992.  I have added two paragraphs (summary in introductory section, more detailed under History section, mainly lifted from the other article History of the Royal Military Police) and would suggest corresponding details that are due be added to the Infobox.Cloptonson (talk) 21:58, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Part of Adjutant General's Corps

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Royal Military Police. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130630021934/http://www.army.mod.uk:80/agc/provost/31840.aspx to https://www.army.mod.uk/agc/provost/31840.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:23, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Is there an armed component to the RMP, like Authorised Firearms Officers in the Met or are they a strictly unarmed force? 98.10.179.163 (talk) 00:26, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  firearms use 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Royal Military Police. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150418050407/http://www.robsongreen.com:80/soldiersoldier.php to http://www.robsongreen.com/soldiersoldier.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:05, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:20, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
*  ()
*  ()
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:50, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:53, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion