Talk:Filipino psychology

message: Dudes, this article is better suited for WikiPilipinas. TheTechieGeek63 (talk) 13:19, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia vs WikiPilipinas

message: I would like to move Philippine psychology to Filipino superstitions--Jondel 02:33, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Filipino superstitions

message: characteristics 
1.palabra de honor-a person with one word
2.hospitality-warm acceptance to our visitors
3.crab mentality-pushing each other way down  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.84.172.170 (talk) 10:23, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  filipino values 

message: 5 or 6 words are explained as "actually" meaning something different from their simple translation. Would it be more precise to say in such cases that "the word A, usually translated as B, is etymologically related to the concept C"? Otherwise you open a philosophical can of worms about meaning, translation, etc. Wegesrand (talk) 12:28, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "actually" => "etymologically"? 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:15, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Yuchengco Hall.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: : Filipinos value conformity because unlike non-Asian countries, its culture is predominantly Christian
This sentence doesn't make any sense.  Should it be deleted? Viriditas (talk) 02:52, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conformity and religion 

message: Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
When examining the article, there was an abundant amount of information present; however, in terms of citing every fact directly throughout the sections, there wasn't a reference superscripted within the text. There was however a list of references as a footnote, as needed. 
Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
The article is constructed in a neutral setting. It states facts and contains no bias. There was no sign of any kind of opinion throughout the article. The article basically gives straightforward definitions and explanations of certain Filipino psychological constructs and the history behind them. Miaelmore (talk) 16:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation of this article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Filipino psychology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090621002336/http://journaloffilipinostudies.csueastbay.edu/html/washington.html to http://journaloffilipinostudies.csueastbay.edu/html/washington.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:58, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified