lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kathleen Ni Houlihan

message: I thought the name was Caitlin Ni Houlihan, not Kathleen Ni Houlihan. Usually it is spelled Cathleen anyway.
Maybe the page name should be changed.
Please comment.
SimonMcC 02:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: I was hoping the article could enlighten me as to the origin of the name. James Clarence Mangan wrote a poen entitled Kathaleen Ny-Houlahan but I gather the name goes back further than that. "Kathleen" is, of course, a popular Irish name, but what, if any, was the significance of her father's name, "Houlihan", can anybody say?  86.44.199.115 (talk) 19:39, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the name
Talk:Kent Fuchs

message: Yeah, I am really sorry about that copywrite incident, but i just put it up and I was going to work on it later.  Looking back, I probably should have used a sandbox.--Cornell010 02:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you should never, ever put copywrited content on Wikipedia, not even on a sandbox. Read the biography. Write about it in an encyclopedaic tone, following Wikipedia's guidelines, either on the article space or in Notepad if you *must* start from something that may be copywrited. —mercuryboardtalk 06:02, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Australian of the Year Award recipients

message: I am interested in tabulating some more data about each recipiant, if there are no commentaries, i will begin this. Absolt 16:10, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  tabilating more data 

message: I'm not sure all of these are appropriate.  For example, in 1961 Joan Sutherland was still not a dame, nor had she received her AC or OM.  In 1965, Robert Helpmann was still Mr Helpmann, not Sir Robert.  Etc, etc.  I think it's better to include only those honorifics they held at the time they were named Australian of the Year.  But before setting out on this task, I'll await comments.  --  JackofOz (talk) 23:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: On reflection, it would be even better and simpler to have no postnominals at all, and only Sir/Dame if they had in fact received that honour prior to being named A of the Y.  I'll make the change.  --  JackofOz (talk) 07:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Postnominals and honorifics

message: Given there seems to be a rather odd amount of vandalism would it be worth putting a 'Semi-Pretection' on this article. Nford24 (talk) 23:42, 14 March 2012 (AEST)
:Have considered that but reckon its not quite bad enough yet. If it deteriorates any further please let me know. Moondyne (talk) 02:25, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: done. Partial rationale also being that this type of content should have very minimal traffic. Moondyne (talk) 06:24, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Semi-Protection

message: Hello, this page has Jack Brabham shown as alive, but he died 19 May 2014.
210.49.209.115 (talk) 14:16, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Mark Hurd (talk) 15:21, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

text: Mark Hurd (talk) 13:38, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 August 2014 

message: Died 5 June 2015. Could someone edit please? Capey (talk) 08:55, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Mark Hurd (talk) 13:38, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

text: Mark Hurd (talk) 05:52, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

text: Mark Hurd (talk) 14:05, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alan Bond 

message: Please change  LTGEN Peter Cosgrove to be Governor General till 2019. It says "present" right now. 124.168.211.242 (talk) 23:41, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Thanks. Was done by Nford24, but they forgot to mark this as answered. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 02:43, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 June 2020
Talk:Klaus Gerhart

message: In what way is this page not wikified? As much information as is known about the photographer is included. References are cited. Dates, names, cities, other important terms are linked. Even ISBN numbers are cited! I beg to differe: This page is wikified. Tim1965 02:29, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should it be included that Pohlmann Press Gallery was located at 1772 N Main St, Los Angeles, CA 90031, as recently as 2004? Might still be. 68.0.119.181 19:53, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This location has been abandoned. 68.0.119.139 (talk) 00:27, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Klaus' Pohlmann Press
Talk:Electric organ (fish)

message: An editor has seen fit first to delete the "In fiction" section as irrelevant, and then without any sort of discussion (per WP:BRD), again to delete both a paraphrase and the supposedly "overlong" quotation which actually related the fiction to the electric organ of fishes. For the sake of harmony, I've not restored the quotation, despite its obvious relevance and the need for it in the paragraph, and its very modest length; instead, I've paraphrased it so there is now no quotation there. To be clear, the section is certainly relevant, as it situates the electric organs of fishes in literature as well as in biology. I hope this is now sufficient justification and the matter can be considered closed. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:52, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  In fiction section
Talk:Stamp sand

message: I made a few mods... not ALL stamp sand contains dangerous traces so I softened that by adding a "may"... stamp mill processing didn't always use heat. Copper ore especially, often had base metal that could be mechanically separated, or the metal could be removed by leaching. (these last two require a lot of process water which is why so many stamp mills are near water sources) Also I noted that there have been instances of previously discarded sand being gathered up and processed again (there is a big abandoned dredge on the Portage Canal in the Keweenaw Peninsula that was used for this, it's a striking photo). This is all sourcable, I'll have to try to dig for the sources. ++Lar: t/c 15:05, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  tweaks
Talk:Tata Consultancy Services/Archive 1

message: Latest onn TCS....TCS and another Tata Group Company called Tata Infotech (TIL) have merged. More than 3000 Tata Infotech employees are now on TCS mercy.
TCS has stopped their Super-annuation, a retirement benefit in India payroll. But, they are not willing to give back the hugh sum accumulated in this fund by the employees of Tata Infotech overs the years of their service. 
This sum is deducted from the employees paycheck every month. Now that there is no provision for Super-annuation in TCS pay structure, it should give the erstwhile Tata Infotech employees their accumulated Super-annuation funds back.
But TCS is intensionally delaying this pay-out and in the name of Tata Trust rules, it is denying that payment. The Tata Trust is the one who was collecting and investing the superannuation funds for both, TCS and Tata Infotech.
But when TCS merged with Tata Infotech, TCS recovered all the dues outstanding form the employees, but said that the employee will have to for-go all the money that was due on Tata Infotech. This is cruel and in-just to long serving employees.
When repeatedly asked about the Super-annuation funds, the TCS management has  declined to answer the queries and have never came out with an explanation in the last 1 year of merger.
This is another example of TCS ding illegal employee practices.
TCS is converting the H1-B visa of erstwhile Tata INfotech Employees to L1-B visa in illegal manner. They are forcing the employees to submit petition under the name of Specialized Knowledge class for L1-B. When the employee is not using the TCS technology and is working on the client-location on H1-B, its illegal to use this type of class to get L1-B.
TCS does this for -
1. They do not have to follow Prevailing Wage Rate, a requirement for H1-B.
2. L1-B employee cannot shift job in the US freely, like the H1-B employee can do.
3. TCS can then pay less than 50% of the prevailing market rate to the employee and still the employee cannot do anythjing as they are liable for the status change.
I would ask Mr. TCS defender to answer these queries at the earliest....if not, then he/she should go back to his sponsers with these cases and seek an answer.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The current article seems to be opinionated and does not provide neutral facts. Probably needs clean up. evolve 19:21, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Electrocutioner

message: The intro says he first appeared in 1992... the art is from 1984... what gives?
Was one of the later Electrocutioners created in 1992 and if so what was the first appearence of the original?
Duggy 1138 03:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone wasn't looking hard enough... I'm locating the appropriate info... — J Greb 03:13, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I put in a link to the first Electrocutioner so obviously I did look hard enough, I just didn't use it in the article I was curious to see what you'd do and who would show up. --69.136.111.100 15:53, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Huh?

message: The "unrevealed" Electrocutioner was NOT the one featured in Vigilante. That was the original, unnamed Buchinsky brother. The "unrevealed" one was more or less a one-off villain who appeared between the two. Someone with info on that second Electrocutioner's appearance should fix it.
SirStack (talk) 09:48, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identity confusion
Talk:Ravenwood High School

message: Note that Wikipedia is not a place for posting personal opinions about teachers, etc.  It also requires verifiable sources for information.  This article needs cleanup to meet Wikipedia standards and guidelines. — ERcheck (talk) 04:17, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriate content 
Talk:Food in Judaism

message: This article is lacking!  What is the status of the improvements?
1 The contents of this article do not match the title.
2 It is not a Jewish History article
3 It would fit nicely into Jewish cuisine.
--Redaktor 20:39, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

message: This should be merged either into Jewish cuisine or Passover. 76.215.10.35 21:52, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge!
Talk:St. Maria Goretti

message: I read this article because the saint's death was listed on Wikipedia's daily listing of events, births and deaths. By the time I finished the article, I felt I had to alert someone at Wikipedia about its contents. There is only one footnote for the entire article, and that footnote links to a website dedicated to this, the youngest saint in the "Universal Church" (I quote the article).
This article is biased and is not up to Wikipedia standards. It should be marked by a warning box. The only information that is not tainted is presented at the top of the article in short paragraphs as a timeline. The rest of the article (without independent citations) is simply church propaganda and should not be allowed to be in Wikipedia without at least a warning. --Buenolio 02:51, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Some info about that controversy has been added here: Maria Goretti Lunamaria 18:00, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Savannah Port Terminal Railroad

message: * Specific text to be added or removed: In 2021, SAPT broadened its rail service agreement with the Georgia Ports Authority (GPA) to include their new Mason Mega Rail Terminal. The new agreement is expected to double the rail container capacity at the Port. Since 1998, SAPT has provided the Port of Savannah’s rail intermodal and merchandise service. After completion, SAPT is now able to build and receive six 10,000-foot trains simultaneously.
* Reason for the change: This information adds valuable/applicable information to this page, and is backed by sources.
* References supporting change: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210421005327/en/GW%E2%80%99s-Savannah-Port-Terminal-Railroad-Broadens-Agreement-With-Georgia-Ports-Services-to-Include-Mason-Mega-Rail-Terminal
Nick.deligtisch (talk) 16:56, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have any independent sourcing? PK650 (talk) 06:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The editor who posted the request has been indefinitely banned, so I'm closing the request template.  Spintendo  23:34, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sandersville Railroad

message: ==Untitled==
The History section of the article present in February 2008 was copied from the Sandersville Railroad's website As the Sandersville Railroad webpage lists a copyright date of 2005 and the WP article information was added in 2008, it appears that the content orgionated with the railroad. If permission from the railroad was given to copy/paste that information, please provide reference to such and restore section. Please see Wikipedia:Copyright violations for more information on relevant WP policies. Civilengtiger (talk) 15:42, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History section copyright

message: The History section of the article present in February 2008 was copied from the Sandersville Railroad's website As the Sandersville Railroad webpage lists a copyright date of 2005 and the WP article information was added in 2008, it appears that the content orgionated with the railroad. If permission from the railroad was given to copy/paste that information, please provide reference to such and restore section. Please see Wikipedia:Copyright violations for more information on relevant WP policies. Civilengtiger (talk) 15:42, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:St. Mary's Railroad

message: Some images of the actual locomotives would be nice. If you have or can get some to add, please do. Legohead1my_talk 16:18, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have two of Locomotive number 507 that I uploaded recently. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  16:32, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's one. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  13:34, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: As I've been sorting out commons images simply given the broad category "Rail vehicles of the United States," I saw at least three of them from the St. Mary's Railroad. But I don't think it's this St. Mary's Railroad. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  16:10, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another St. Mary's Railroad?
Talk:Ross Errilly Friary

message: The original text, which I hope to expand and improve upon, is adapted from a government-provided information plaque at the abbey site.  I have some good photos of the abbey, which I'll place under a CC license for the purposes of this article.Dppowell 02:56, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work, my compliments! ClemMcGann 10:15, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Clem!Dppowell 14:07, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm seeking sources for the modern preservation/restoration of the friary, e.g., who did it, who/what provided the impetus, when it happened, etc. Dppowell (talk) 03:36, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preservation
Talk:Heart of Georgia Railroad

message: I completely rebuilt this article from scratch 9/11/10. The previous version had no references and a lot of unverified information. There is now a large history section, an infobox, and a more accurate description of the railroad.
FrankieG123 (talk) 13:28, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Rapid sand filter

message: The statement that rapid sand filters are "not usually classed as an appropriate technology" seems to be POV.  Please check.
68.50.203.109 02:59, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Appropriate" technology 

message: The disadvantages are not supported.
Frankly, I think that the disadvantages listed here are incorrect. I have removed them previously because there is no supporting discussion related to the subject.—Preceding unsigned comment added by  75.16.94.3  (talk • contribs)  06:10, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've edited the article in an attempt to restore some balance, and added a reference. However, I'm considering tagging the Advantages & Disadvantages section as off-topic. This is an article about the rapid sand filter, not an article on how to select the best drinking water treatment system for a particular setting, whether it be a village in a developing nation or a large, developed metropolitan community.  The rapid and slow sand filters are no longer directly comparable (although they were a hundred years ago, when the technologies were new). In current engineering practice, rapid sand filters are not intended to be used as stand-alone systems; I added this point in the "Design and operation" section. Comparisons of various drinking water technologies are already provided, to some extent, in the Water purification article. Moreau1 (talk) 03:25, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Changes made, per my previous comment. Moreau1 (talk) 22:41, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disadvantages
Talk:Cornell Big Red

message: The way the table is set up right now makes it look kind of awkward. I was wondering if we could make it horizontal somehow and shift it toward the bottom.--Cornell010 03:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Making the table horizontal 

message: With this edit, I removed lyrics to the "New Cornell Fight Song" (NCFS) on suspicion of them still being under copyright. I was correct in this assumption; a search confirms that the lyrics were written in 1976 by Professor Marice Stith. —Notyourbroom (talk) 03:23, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of copyrighted lyrics 
Talk:Robin Shou

message: :: article is in work, thank you -- Tashunko 07:09, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Is the sentence necessary at all? Tashunko 16:46, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: In Work
Talk:Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway

message: CN Just bought out EJ&E!
www.cn.ca/EJEacquisition
Mistyben 01:28, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The sale isn't completed yet.  They only announced that they were going to make the purchase, the STB has yet to approve or deny the sale.  Until the sale is closed, the EJ&E is still operating. Slambo (Speak) 14:20, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alton and Southern Railway

message: I believe the official site's history has an error; I'd tell them but they don't have an email address listed. The 1917 extension was not to the ex-CP&StL Litchfield and Madison Railway (later C&NW), which was split from the CP&StL in 1904, but slightly beyond to what was still the Chicago, Peoria and St. Louis Railroad, later the Alton and Eastern Railroad, Illinois Terminal Company, and now Norfolk Southern Railway at Edwardsville Road. --NE2 18:45, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chicago and Western Indiana Railroad

message: From having walked the CRL's trackage between 106th St and 118th St. I would dispute that CRL uses any former CWI trackage. From approxomately 104th St to the 118th St yard, CRL uses ex Rock Island trackage that was east of the Belt tracks north of 112th and east of the CWI south of there, and in fact is not connected with the CWI. At the south end of the 118th St yard is a track connection with the CWI that was installed in the 1960's sometime so the IHB trains could access that yard from the south. The original IHB connection was on a swing bridge just east of the CWI lift bridge that was rammed by a ship in the 60's. At that point IHB built two connecting tracks, one north and one south of the river, in order to bybass the wrecked bridge.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.223.60.199 (talk) 23:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CWI and Chicago Rail-Link 
Talk:Joji Yuasa

message: Does he hold U.S. citizenship?  Badagnani 07:50, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citizenship 
Talk:Safiyya bint Abd al-Muttalib

message: Copied from deleted but chached site: 
I dont want the info to go lost.--Striver 03:11, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have deleted the following quotation.
:"The Messenger of God said, 'The only two things I cherish of the life of this world are women and perfume'" (Tabaqat, volume 1, page 380)
Although it is interesting and properly referenced, I just don't see how it's relevant to an article about Safiyyah. It might be a relevant addition to an article about Muhammad.Petra MacDonald 11:06, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Perfume Paragraph
Talk:List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 68

message: The Commander-in-chief link must be disambiguated, somehow, because it points to Commander-in-Chief (a person).  Superslum 03:11, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Supreme Court case might be re-titled Commander-in-chief (1864) and then piped to Commander-in-chief.  However, it must be kept separate from the person.  A new title with a pipe will generate Commander-in-chief.  Superslum 11:34, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am a lawyer and legal historian, and am updating this list in a table format with case name, Bluebook citation, link to the opinion at www.courtlistener.com; also opinions, lower court, and disposition of the case. I am also adding portraits and information about the justices who were members of the Supreme Court at the time. Ballinacurra Weston (talk) 22:56, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating this article
Talk:Galena and Chicago Union Railroad

message: To highlight the importance of the G&CU being the first railroad built starting in Chicago, I put it in the first sentence of the intro paragraph. To avoid repetition, then, I removed what was basically the same sentence from the first paragraph in the "History" section. 
I also cut the point about the railroad being chartered a year before the City of Chicago -- while that's true, Chicago had already been chartered as a town in 1833, and then was moved to city status in 1837, a year after the G&CU was incorporated. The comparison as worded seemed a bit misleading to me, implying that Chicago hadn't yet been organized in any way.
I plan on adding some information on historical contexts which will better set up the historical information already there. James Postema (talk) 22:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slight refocusing of first two paragraphs