Talk:Human spaceflight programs

message: "alphabetically by programme" is unnecessary. I'm moving this page to List of manned space missions. --Jiang 04:32, 20 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: I see that brief mission descriptions have been added for some of these flights. I was planning to start filling in a few more, but taking this to its logical conclusion I would simply be replicating all the information at List of human spaceflights - which seems kind of pointless. What's the view on this? In the interests of avoiding duplication would it be better to remove the flight descriptions here (making sure all info was already at List of human spaceflights) and then just have a plain list of missions here, referring people to List of human spaceflights (and of course the detailed articles about the missions, which are already linked) for further information?
Or maybe just retain the really salient information here (such as first US manned orbital flight, first moon manding etc.) and relegate everything else to the other articles?
Any thoughts?
Matt 19:48, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What to do with mission descriptions on this page?

message: I have a number of points on which I would like to improve this article:
* Individual spaceflights should not be listed. There is already an article for that. There should also not be a redirect from 'list of human spaceflights by program'
* More description on each one. There is a lot more that can be said about, for instance, the Soyuz program beyond a list of Soyuz flights the editors consider interesting.
* More pictures - space travel is a very visual thing and there are plenty of pictures in the public domain that could be used to give the reader a break from the considerable amount of text here.
* More up to date information. The space stations section for instance doesn't list quite mature plans for space stations by Bigelow Aerospace and the Chinese space agency.
So long as I am not stepping on anyones toes by making big modifications here, I will proceed shortly GrampaScience (talk) 17:09, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: I would like to take a swing at this article

message: It has been proposed (by this anon) to merge List of manned spacecraft into this list. I think the two topics are closely related, but not identical; I think there would be value in having two separate lists. So I'm against the merger; unless anyone objects, I'll remove the merge tags. Mlm42 (talk) 23:31, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the tags. Mlm42 (talk) 17:28, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger

message: Given the inclusion of TKS, which has never carried humans from the surface, and space station programmes, I'm thinking of including 'unmanned' manned spacecraft - i.e. ATV, H-II, Dragon and Progress.
This is going to put a squeeze on space, but I think its important. I suggest getting rid of the ones that are 'in development' were cancelled (or putting them in a seperate argument) and putting information about Progress in the Soyuz section as they are virtually identical, and merging Dragon into the CCDev/COTS section as it is the only demonstrated vehicle that has come out of that.
Real manned space programs are always outnumbered by aerospace industry hot air and paper projects. We can keep this article the right size by only listing craft that have actually, you know, been built and sent into space. 
If no objections, I will proceed with this shortly. GrampaScience (talk) 16:09, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-surface launched human spaceflight programmes 

message: Why there is a Mercury spacecraft shown here, which was a suborbital flight, and Gagarin's Vostok spacecraft not? That makes no sense, and is in-fact a bit ridiculous.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.17.14.17 (talk) 20:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vostok not shown? 

message: Members of the Manned Spaceflight Engineer Program not shown.204.238.227.14 (talk) 13:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manned Spaceflight Engineer Program not shown? 

message: On the Soyuz program section on this article it says that the program began in "1913", now I don't know about anyone else but that sounds a little too early as not even the USSR existed yet. So can someone fix it with the right year. Sion8 (talk) 01:17, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did the Soyuz program began? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on List of human spaceflight programs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100204201200/http://news.yahoo.com:80/s/afp/20100131/ts_alt_afp/usspacepolitics to http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100131/ts_alt_afp/usspacepolitics
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100305131136/http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2011/assets/trs.pdf to http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2011/assets/trs.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:45, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :List of human spaceflight programs's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "spaceflightnow.com":
From List of private spaceflight companies: Spaceflight Now | Breaking News | Beating swords into plough shares with Soviet Almaz
From SpaceShipTwo: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 10:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:List of human spaceflight programs]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on List of human spaceflight programs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140322013556/http://archived.thespaceshow.com/shows/2212-BWB-2014-03-21.mp3 to http://archived.thespaceshow.com/shows/2212-BWB-2014-03-21.mp3
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100710092025/http://www.bigelowaerospace.com/orbital-complex-construction.php to http://bigelowaerospace.com/orbital-complex-construction.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160322085643/http://www.russianspaceweb.com/opsek.html to http://www.russianspaceweb.com/opsek.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:00, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on List of human spaceflight programs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090415214124/http://www.arianespace.com/news-soyuz-vega/2008/2008-10-03-Vega-Soyuz.asp to http://www.arianespace.com/news-soyuz-vega/2008/2008-10-03-Vega-Soyuz.asp
*Added  tag to ftp://130.206.92.88/Espacio/Mesa%20Redonda%205%20-%20R3%20-%20TSNIIMASH%20-%20V%20M%20IVANOV.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151023044651/http://www.bakersfieldcalifornian.com/local/x1143260271/SpaceShipTwo-experiences-in-flight-anomaly to http://www.bakersfieldcalifornian.com/local/x1143260271/SpaceShipTwo-experiences-in-flight-anomaly
*Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20151008122541/http://www.ari.ac.ir/images/newsletter/1393/9311v.pdf to http://www.ari.ac.ir/images/newsletter/1393/9311v.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150221092159/http://tehrantimes.com/politics/121912-iran-displays-manned-spacecraft-prototype to http://www.tehrantimes.com/politics/121912-iran-displays-manned-spacecraft-prototype
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:49, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: BFR (rocket) should be added, either as part of the existing Dragon 2 section (then a general SpaceX section) or as separate section. —mfb (talk) 02:03, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  SpaceX’ BFR is missing  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of human spaceflight programs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161009165559/https://copenhagensuborbitals.com/history/spacecraft-2/tycho-brahe/ to https://copenhagensuborbitals.com/history/spacecraft-2/tycho-brahe/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :List of human spaceflight programs's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "a3-1":
From Artemis program: 
From List of Artemis missions: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:21, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --mfb (talk) 23:45, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:List of human spaceflight programs]]