lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Daryl F. Mallett

message: New VFD initiated June 24, 2005.  Someone has added back all of the non-notable content which was deleted in the previous VFD round.  This is more evidence that this page is the work of one author and is of little or no use to the Wikicommunity.  Perhaps this material belongs on a Wikipedia user page instead of an article. Tanstaafl 22:48, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Mallett may not be a Stephen King or Arthur C. Clarke yet, but he has a small, rabid group of fans that are excited about his work (co-wrote the storyline for a Star Trek: The Next Generation two-part episode, short story in one of the Star Wars anthologies) and he's going to be famous someday. They obviously love his work and support him. It sounds like a few jealous losers that don't want him to have an entry. If Ronald Reagan's article is so short, maybe they should go add to it! Isn't the point of an encyclopedia to have as much information as possible on a subject? Geez. I agree with the above post. Keep up the good work, Mallett!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davrob45 (talk • contribs) 18:31, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep
Talk:Orders of magnitude (area)

message: This article needs to take a similar format to other Order of Magnitude pages - see column headings Ian Cairns 00:18, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. May be riddled with errors. I tried to choose examples that people can relate to, btw, rather than trivia. One-dimensional Tangent (Talk) 03:38, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: I've been working for about two hours on this, PLEASE DO NOT REVERT. The page has proper metrication now down to the mm. I have also used only major prefixes, mm, m km etc squared. dm are cm are deprecated for proper scaling here, but they are included. Note how the table is much clearer this way. Again, please do not revert without using the talk page. --Cpt ricard (talk) 05:52, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metrication 

message: 980000 KM² INC SPANISH GUYANA  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.93.247.123 (talk) 23:36, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  new spain area 

message: The conversion for the area of the observable universe is incorrect. 2.7E53 is not 2700 Yottametres  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dickpenn (talk • contribs) 12:52, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conversion to yottametres is incorrect
Talk:Edward Ebersol

message: I saw the heart breaking interview with Susan St. James tonight on the NBC news.  She thanked everyone for the concern and letters, and said she would read whatever was sent to her.  I'd very much like to send a letter to her, in sympathy.  DOES ANYONE KNOW HOW TO REACH HER?  OR WHERE ONE CAN SEND MAIL THAT SHE WILL RECIEVE???
PLEASE HELP.  THANKS
:try calling your local NBC affiliate, they may know where to send mail. Alkivar 01:50, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:List of Marvel Comics people

message: What is the intended scope of this list? Obviously we're not going to list everyone who's ever worked on a Marvel Comic. Obviously all the Editors-in-Chief are important, as are Stan and Jack. The inclusion of Frank Miller and Todd McFarlane seems to indicate that we're also including at least those writers & artists who contributed significantly to the history of Marvel. What about somebody like Howard Mackie or Sergio Aragonés? Chuck Austen? James Owsley/Christopher Priest (incidentally, how do we name him? Born James Owsley [and worked in comics under that name], now goes by Christopher Priest, although there's also a science fiction writer named Christopher Priest. I suppose we'll have to disambiguate him, as well as Ralph Macchio (The Karate Kid)/Ralph Macchio (comics)]. -leigh (φθόγγος) 00:34, Dec 4, 2004 (UTC)
This is a problemmatic and duplicative list. Much the same material appears at List of comic creators (which includes both those who have created characters or comics, and well-known writers/artists who are "comic book creators" in a more general sense. Should not this list be merged with the other? --Tenebrae, Sept. 8, 2005, 6:31PM
:I don't know whether or not this list is useful or necessary. But while it's here, I propose that it be limited to former Marvel employees (freelance or staff) with sufficient notoriety to already have a Wikipedia page.  So Howard Mackie is in, as are Archie Goodwin, Steve Buccellato, and David Wohl.  I just added all of those, as they're the missing names that came to mind as I viewed the list.  I'm sure there are many more to add.  But I think we should remove Annette Kawecki, Pauline Loth, Lisa Patrick, and Christie Scheele, since none of them have Wikipedia pages. -- Miketsu (talk) 22:54, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope
Talk:Who Are You

message: They is no mention of the CSI version in this article. Should it be made? (user:Alec1990 11/12/2007)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.216.152.159 (talk) 22:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CSI 

message: I accidentally hit "revert" rather than "undo" on the last edit.  Nonetheless, the last edit was clearly wrong, showing "1975" as the date of the "Who Are You?" single. -- RobLa (talk) 22:59, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of "Who Are You" single 

message: If you look at the drummer Keith Moon on the album cover, the one sitting on the chair, the chair says : Not to be taken away.
this album was released August, 1978.  Keith Moon died from accidental overdose, September 7, 1978.
the above was added in the article please fit this into the article i disagree with this being put in like this how ever it seems like a interesting detail  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Weaponbb7 (talk • contribs) 00:47, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: SOMETHING WEIRD...

message: So the one reference, "Daltry talks about the fight" only links to www.thegreatestpageintheuniverse.com, or Maddox's website.  This is probably something that should be fixed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.98.212.112 (talk) 20:42, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Progressive rock and punk rock? This is a silly oversimplification. I can see how punk might have been considered a "camp," but prog rock had for the most part ceased to be a commercial force by 1978. There's was a lot going on in the 1970s that had little to do with prog. Unless this can be sourced and put in context, it really should be rewritten. · rodii · 03:47, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the two major camps of rock" 

message: Please change the title of the article to Who Are You (album) to avoid confusion with the song of the same name that is on the album. Globbett (Spl4t Sh3rm4n) 11:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move request
Talk:House of Bush, House of Saud

message: For a December 2004 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/House of Bush, House of Saud
----
There is a book by Craig Unger with this title (ISBN 074325337X).  As such it is potentially noteworthy and should be kept.
However, the present text seems to be a copyvio or little more than advertising (the text is taken almost verbatim from http://www.houseofbush.com/ ). --MarkSweep 00:46, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Royal Lao Government in Exile

message: These comments were moved from the main discussion as they are not relevant to whether the article should be kept or deleted. -- Cyrius|✎ 00:48, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: I was banned from Vietnam royal and also Vietnam war.
Please CYRIUS  read the arbcom, what you are doing is mis-information is SLANDER agaist me.
IF you continue to do this I will report you to the ARBCOM.
PLEASE REFRAIN  --Jimmyvanthach 19:35, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: YOU ARE WRONG
Talk:The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask

message: Many unsourced sentences, paragraphs, and sections. A455bcd9 (talk) 10:06, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:URFA/2020]]

message: This article seems to be lacking sources for some sections, mainly the gameplay and plot. I don't really know what sources would be best for this, while avoiding stuff like fan sites. 22090912l (talk) 14:24, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, this needs work. This featured article should be reviewed as it has several large sections with missing citations. Fieryninja (talk) 05:40, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I'm very new at dealing with stuff like this but it seems to me like it should be reviewed. I've made a start on it and added a couple of sources, but it still needs more work. 22090912l (talk) 15:45, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing Issues
Talk:Eye color

message: Please can you remove the photo of Daniel Craig with the caption "Actor Daniel Craig has the most common eye color in the U.K. as of 2014: (blue: 48%, green: 30%, brown: 22%)." This is not true. The linked source is a Times article which quotes a project by 'ScotlandsDNA'. This is a disgraced company, not a scientific source. The myth that blue eyes are more common in the UK now is widespread but untrue. All other studies suggest brown is the most common (even in Scotland!). Green is likely to be the least common. Please see the links below. I would be really grateful if you could remove this misinformation. Thank you for your help. 
1) Dubious practices and claims by this company: https://www.mdpi.com/2313-5778/2/4/47
2) Brown is the most common eye colour in UK as of 2019: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872497318303387
3) Brown is possibly even the most common eye colour in Scotland (small sample from 2009): 
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2810292/ 217.155.204.10 (talk) 15:09, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: ― novov (t c) 05:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 March 2024 

message: The article says that "gender" is a deciding factor in what color a person's eyes are. The word gender links to the wikipedia page about gender which is defined as sociocultural. This term should be replaced by "sex" instead because its referring to the biological sexes instead. 152.7.255.202 (talk) 15:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gender and Sex are not interchangable, Edit request! 

message: Under the "Impact on Vision" section, there's no mention of findings related to vision in low-light. I'd add it myself but this is yet another gatekept article (rather ironic for a wiki site, no?)
You can find a reference to a study at the University of Copenhagen here: 
https://katrinapaulson.medium.com/study-suggests-people-with-blue-eyes-can-read-better-in-dim-lighting-01b39d1862a6
…and to a study at Liverpool John Moore University here:
https://www.ljmu.ac.uk/about-us/news/articles/2024/2/7/blue-eyes
…as well as a passing reference to the findings in a section marked "Does eye color affect night sky vision?" here: 
https://www.almanac.com/seeing-in-the-dark
While these aren't absolutely conclusive, I would argue they're no less substantiated or valid than the portion referring to the study on "Correlation of eye color on self-paced and reactive motor performance." Gaius315 (talk) 16:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hardly a "gatekept" article. It's protected from random driveby vandalism; once you've made a total of ten edits on Wikipedia, you'll be able to add these references yourself. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 19:17, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eye Color and Low-Light Vision Studies
Talk:Ögedei Khan

message: John Keegan's History of Warfare discusses the strategies and tactics employed by the Khans. One key area was the use of mobile warfare dependent on their large cavalry. His theory was that after leaving the Steppes, this cavalry would have had serious challenges in feeding the horses - less pasture land - and would have gradually lost enough horses to sustain that type of warfare. It was inevitable, according to Keegan, that they would have failed.
For that reason I feel the section discussing their ability to conquer all of Europe needs to be better balanced.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.253.81.39 (talk) 03:10, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The Mongols would have been over-extended in Europe beyond Ukraine. Their military foray into Hungary was "successful" but they wouldn't have been able to maintain a long-term base there. Even the Golden Horde very quickly had to rely on local princes in Russia to keep order. Destroying an army and pacifying/occupying a country are different things.104.169.18.4 (talk) 00:30, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ogedai Kahn wouldn't have conquered all of Europe 

message: "He was an extremely pragmatic person, much like his father, and looked at the end rather than the means" By pragmatic is machiavellian what's meant here?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.41.187.172 (talk) 13:28, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Machiavellian?
Talk:Leftoverture

message: This page has a lot of information that needs to be distilled into a more encyclopedic style.
Also, I have some misgivings about the npov.
Awesimo 19:33, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And four years on, this is finally fixed. It boggles the mind how few Wikipedia editors follow WP: BOLD. You'd think that would be the easiest Wikipedia rule to obey.--Martin IIIa (talk) 02:13, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality? 

message: the album wasn't called leftoverture because it was a collection of leftover songs.  The song Magnum Opus was original called Leftoverture because it was a collection of song snippets all stuck together.  The album was originally to be titled Magnum Opus, but for some reason (which I can't remember ATM but I know the band has said) the band decided to switch them.  This should be changed in the article. DragonsDream (talk) 20:58, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leftoverture title
Talk:Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30

message: There seems to be a rewrite happening at Brothers_In_Arms/Temp pamri 05:02, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
:sorry. that seems to be the copy vio'ed article. pamri 05:04, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
:What's the deal with Brothers_In_Arms/Temp, anyway?  Shouldn't that article be removed, in favor of this one? Beanbatch 18:32, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The Temp link is now gone, redirected here. Beanbatch 22:32, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brothers_In_Arms/Temp 

message: Isn't this game based on soldiers of the 502nd, not the 506th? The reason I haven't changed it already is because I'm not sure of this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scratt Wiesmann (talk • contribs) 
:You are correct. The game is based on the 502nd Infantry Regiment (United States). This is also consistent with the true-to-life character of Robert G. Cole in the game as an officer. --Scottie_theNerd 14:23, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unit 

message: どうも、初めまして。こちらの記事では大半、シリーズの記事がありますよね？これを唐突に言われても分からないので例を挙げます。例えば、このMedal of Honor (series)です。個人的には、Brothers in Armsも同様にシリーズをまとめた記事が作ってもらいたいのですが可能でしょうか？これは世界の人にも役に立つ事だと思うのですが、如何でしょうか？--60.42.167.204 (talk) 11:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: これは英語の Wikipedia です。私たちはわかるために英語で書いて下さい。　--Scottie_theNerd 15:40, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  なぜ、シリーズ記事を作らないのですか？ 

message: Can anyone please add a reception section to this article? I could do it myself probably, but not being familiar with the standard format on Wikipedia for this kind of section (or with this particular game), I'd rather someone else did it. Thanks, Ynhockey (Talk) 20:16, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: Shouldn't we add a page for the comic ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.190.89.202 (talk) 00:14, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comic ? 

message: Hey, do you know if the name of this was inspired on music/album of Dire Straits?
Khullah (talk) 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Inspiration? 
Talk:Monolith (Kansas album)

message: The album cover features an indian in a space helmet with horns on it standing in front of what appears to be the World Trade Center Twin Towers rendered in stone behind which is a lunar scene featuring what appears to be ruins of some sort of built habitation. THe term Monolith in the album title therefore refers to the black monolith from Kubricks "2001 - A Space Odyssey" implies the album cover is telling us there is something on the moon and it has to do with human history/spirituality and our present period. That the band is known to have esoteric influences underscores this interpretation. The song "On THe Other Side" therefore refers to the "other side" of the astral veil, or the state of in-between lives.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.113.204.238 (talk) 01:09, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Talk:The Mystery Series

message: Suggestion: have this page, the language of which isn't especially sophisticated in my opinion, redirect to The Five Find-Outers, which is still talking about Enid Blyton's Mystery Series. Some sort of unification of the two topics is necessary, I think.
I've expanded the Five Find-Outers article to include some of the detail from this page, and made this page a redirect as suggested. --81.155.13.221 21:16, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Drastic Measures

message: "Because the sound of Drastic Measures is closer to the successful records that Loverboy and Foreigner were putting out at the time, Livgren was greatly displeased"...
Interesting. In an interview Livgren did for the People of the South Wind list (Kansas fan email list) about 1995 or 96, he said Drastic Measures had become his favorite of the three early 80s albums.  I just tried searching for the interview but it looks like the old POTSW forum archives have been taken down -- but if I find it I'll add this to the article.  Dragomiloff 00:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:RMS Niagara

message: I apologise for posting so many photo requests. Most are for the "Gold salvage" section, which has a lot of text but no images. Motacilla (talk) 10:31, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo requests

message: FWIW, my dad was stationed at Bream Head in 1940, and was on watch when the ship started to go down. He raised the alarm, but it took him some time to convince his superiors that he wasn't drunk and hallucinating. [[User:Grutness|Grutness talk ] 03:08, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: HIGH SEAS: Super Salvage TIME, March 09, 1942 . Retrieved July 9, 2013  --220 of Borg 04:55, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible source

message: An interesting comment in George Warren Russell:
:As Minister of Public Health, he was responsible for the decision to allow the Niagara to dock in Auckland in 1918, and was blamed for the resulting Spanish Flu epidemic which killed at least 8000 New Zealanders.
Not sure quite what the story is here, but would definitely be interesting to include in the article if it can be dug up. Andrew Gray (talk) 15:58, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Spanish flu

message: Modern accounts claim that Niagara was nicknamed the "Queen of the Pacific". However, I have yet to find a source published when she was in service that used that nickname. I have not deleted the nickname, but I have tagged it as "unsourced" as I have no idea what source those modern accounts are citing. Motacilla (talk) 11:02, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: "Queen of the Pacific"?

message: The salvage ship Claymore seems like it can support an article,   -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 11:33, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Claymore
Talk:Power (Kansas album)

message: I remember reading a newspaper blurb (L.A. Times Calender section in fact) from when this album came out that said the promo copies sent to critics credited the band as "Dodge City" so as not to bias the reviews against some old dinosaur band.  I'm sure I have the yellowing clip somewhere in my storage box of old newspaper articles but if someone has better reference, it seems like an interesting tidbit to include.DragonsDream (talk) 20:56, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dodge City
Talk:Hydrogen-4

message: The link from "this article" now leads to a Scitation website which not only requires a password, but does not even give the standard bibliographic information: authors, title, journal name, volume, pages, year. This means that it is impossible to check the information in the library of a university which does not subscribe specifically to Scitation.
Could someone please insert this information in the article for interested readers?  Dirac66 (talk) 21:59, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference inaccessible 

message: "1. How can H-4 have that mass? Wouldn't it be 5?(Or ~5.0005 if you include the electron)."
Hydrogen-1 has 1 proton and 0 neutron and an atomic mass near 1.
Hydrogen-2 has 1 proton and 1 neutron and an atomic mass near 2.
Hydrogen-3 has 1 proton and 2 neutron and an atomic mass near 3.
Why would hydrogen-4 have an atomic mass of 5?
173.183.79.69 (talk) 08:06, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The answer to why:
Talk:Hydrogen-5

message: See Talk:Hydrogen-4. Can the question in that page be extended to this isotope?? 66.245.28.46 03:30, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: The article Pentium has a hatnote that points to this article, but there's no mention in it that "Pentium" is a possible name of Hydrogen-5. It makes sense that it is, but I think it ought to be mentioned in the article. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 02:34, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This has apparently been resolved. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 01:25, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pentium?
Talk:Bearded saki

message: Anyone know what is meant by the second portion of the following sentence from the article: "After about three months it begins to explore its environment independently and on it is briefly cured"? Aleta Sing 01:11, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Not sure what sentence means

message: The phrase "and on it is briefly cured" doesn't seem to make any sense.  I'm guessing it's trying to say something about the animal being weaned, but it isn't clear. Citizen127 (talk) 06:19, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsensical phrase
Talk:Ontario Highway 403

message: This needs serious work before it get's put in the article. The TESR basically went nowhere with any part of its preferred design, and the Bot Construction page is completely dateless (though it can at least be used for describing what work is being done. -- Floydian τ ¢ 02:47, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oakville / Ford Drive rework 

message: I'm not familiar with the conventions for road articles, but it seems odd that there is no mention of the average traffic volume, as there is for Highway 401. It's not as busy as the 401 of course but this seems like relevant information to include for any major highway. Spicy (talk) 00:57, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The table on Highway 401 isn't common for other road articles, but you're right that there should be some mention. I'll add it in a bit when I get on my laptop. For reference, the highest volume in 2016 was between Eglinton and Hurontario (180,000), while the lowest was at the westernmost end of the highway (20,900). - Floydian τ ¢ 03:42, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traffic volume?