Talk:Wanamaker's

message: There's been an edit which leads one to believe the Wanamaker's flagship store location across from Philadelphia's City Hall was either vacant circa 1995-1996, or was named Hecht's in this same period.  Not being from Philly or even close, all I know is what the May Company said on its website (see article sources).  Is someone more knowledgeable about this and perhaps would like to make the story about this building's recent use more clear?  Thanks!  --avnative 12:36, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
It was Lord & Taylor, before being converted to Macy's.
Njbob (talk) 21:00, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Philadelphia store question

message: I am in Philly, so can only tell you what I remember. After Wannie's closed, other stores did quickly take the location. I remember three, although wouldn't have remembered Hecht's was the first one without reading this article. It was, but it was only Hecht's for a short time. I guess I'm really just verifying something most Philadelphians know, but have no specific source, pass memory.
Also, I wanted to add that there is a little "citation needed" link regarding the saying, "Meet me under the Eagle." Same problem as my last remark. It's just something Philadelphians know. How does one citate common knowledge of Philadelphians? Only thing I can do to prove it (and I'm assuming the same goes for the person who wrote this article) is that we Philadelphians are very picky about our history. If this was not common knowledge, you'd have many Philadelphians finding this page just to complain. ;)
--Atwhatcost (talk) 09:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vague Answer? 

message: In the late 1970's/early 1980's, there was a Wanamaker's store at 150 Broadway (a small office building)in lower Manhattan (northeast corner of Broadway and Liberty Street). The store occupied about a quarter of the first and second floors, plus part of the basement. Kjjj10 04:24, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This page should definitely have a subparagraph listing suburban branch stores as well as an infobox for the chain. 98.115.168.68 (talk) 23:42, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Re-added a section on some of the suburban stores that had been reverted for sockpuppetry. ShadyCrack (talk) 16:48, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former Locations 

message: :Image:Wanamakers.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:46, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Wanamakers.jpg

message: I'm thinking it might be advantageous to split this into two articles: one about Wanamaker's the chain, and another about Wanamaker's the historic location. Like any historic place, I would think a separate article could give it a better treatment than being combined into a mess of details about the company's subsequent history (under May, Macy's, etc.). I'm not from Philly, either, so I wouldn't be the best one to do the split, but I came upon this article while looking into the history of May Company (which used to run May D&F here in Colorado) and just wondered. Comments are appreciated! Duncan1800 (talk) 15:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible to split?

message: My edits today, and the two tags placed, enumerate a very large number of Wikipedia policy violations in this article, which is written like a personal essay lacking virtually any footnotes and having contained an inordinate number of vague, personal, unquantifiable POV, such as someone's voice making the Christmas show "come to life" (among many other examples). Before editing a Wikipedia article, the responsible thing to do is to become familiar with the basic policies at the Five Pillars of Wikipedia, which stress that every statement be verified by authoritative reliable-source citations. -- 207.237.230.157 (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Numerous Wikipedia policy vios