lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:2005 FIFA Confederations Cup

message: Didn't Argentina get invited because they were Olympic champions, rather than runners up in something? Mjefm 21:10, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Argentina

message: The users Kevin McE and Walter Görlitz have said that the naming rights of the stadiums should not be shown, so I'm afraid we will have to change the stadiums' names here. MarcosPassos (talk) 19:55, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I was referring to other tournaments, as, I believe, was Walter.  Look up what authoritative sources did for this tournament, and follow their lead.  Kevin McE (talk) 21:06, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've already told you once, but I will repeat it again. FIFA rules about naming rights are the same in every FIFA tournment. They never show the naming Rights. Since you believe that FIFA is the ultimate source for Wikipedia and we should apply all their rules here in wikipedia, we must change this article as well. There are only 2 options: (1) to include the naming rights in every FIFA tournment's article in wikipedia or to erase the naming rights from every article. Option 1 or option 2. No in-between. MarcosPassos (talk) 22:16, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming rights of the stadiums
Talk:Deanna Brooks

message: Ok, I'm going to try and do what Wiki says, talk this through and assume good faith on everyone’s part. This picture is NOT Deanna Brooks. I've known of Deanna Brooks for years, I've exchanged emails with her, I'm a friend on hers on Myspace and Facebook and I can tell you with absolute certainty...the picture is NOT her. I contacted the person who posted it and told him the exact same thing I'm telling you. You can check out her official website, her Myspace page, her Facebook page, her Twitter page, her IMDB entry or just Google her. The women in this picture is very tanned, Deanna Brooks is fair skinned, always has been, the women pictured has breast implants, Deanna Brooks does not. What is the purpose of constantly adding a photo which is NOT her, why continue to make her entry so glaringly inaccurate?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.202.18.9 (talk) 21:16, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, whoever you are, given that photos of the same model wearing the same clothing at the same event are available on multiple websites, credited to a different photographer, all identified as Deanna Brooks, the identification given by the photographer who's supplied many images to Wikipedia without apparent controversy sure appears to be reliable.  Women in her line of work refurbish themselves rather frequently. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 04:05, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

text: I'm sorry, but I've seen so many "I know the subject" arguments in BLPs that prove to be entirely wrong that I don't see any reason to give yours credibility just on your unsigned say-so. As I said, there's a second photographer out there posting images of the same model at the same event identifying her as Deanna Brooks . A photographer who's recently published other, similar-appearing pictures also identified as her . Explanation? Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 14:26, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

text: If she wants to take this up, she should see Wikipedia:AUTOBIO#Problems_in_an_article_about_you.  Dismas|(talk) 20:12, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benchwarmers event photo, not accurate. 
Talk:On the Record (musical)

message: The Good article nomination for  has failed
:I have failed On the Record's GA nomination for two reasons. First, the huge list of musical numbers is far far far too long, it needs to be summarized and split-off into something like List of musical numbers from On the Record. Second, large sections of text are unsourced (the entire Musical Number section, for example). Also, while not a reason for failing as they may be true, are you sure the photographer of the three images released all rights over them? Some kind of statement/link to a statement would be nice. Staxringold 14:47, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Issues have been addressed and the article has been re-nominated. — warpedmirror (talk) 22:14, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Good articles|Good Article]] [[Wikipedia:Good articles/Nominations|nomination]] has failed 

message: This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of  , , compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?: Very nicely written.
:2. Factually accurate?: Looks good.  Well referenced. In footnote #6 however, there is a typo "I really think your swell."  I think that should be "I really think you're swell."
:3. Broad in coverage?: Thorough in the covered areas.  But (and this is the main reason I failed it, because it's a really nice article so far) I think there should be some inclusion about the financial success of the show.  How much did it make?  How successful was it?  How was it marketed?  Lunchboxes, soundtracks, toys, etc... There is a brief mention of the release of a recording.  That should be a springboard for expansion in this area.
:4. Neutral point of view?: Good, but not quite there yet.  I have the most problem with these phrases: "Others felt..." "Regardless of the critics' opinions of the show itself, most felt..." "Some critics felt..."  These could be improved by saying "Reviewers (such as XYZ) felt it was..."  or "Rolling Stone magazine said..." or "Roger Ebert said..."  As far as her getting the role of Belle, it should said that "Such and such said that her performance persuaded Disney to hire her..." or somthing to that effect.
:5. Article stability? Seems stable.  Not a vandal playground.
:6. Images?: I see the image tags, but those are controversial and highly abused tags, and they should be substantiated.  What proof do you have the rights have been released?  This could be solved with a simple link to the release on the image pages, or some reference (if they came from a hard copy).
When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration.  Thanks for your work so far.
--Esprit15d 17:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed "good article" nomination
Talk:Kabiye language

message: If you are a native speaker of Kabiyé choli then you can help translate this template into your own language:
 Edit
--Amazonien (talk) 22:10, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Kabiyè language template

message: The many references listed in the Linguistic research section look suitable to be included in a further reading section, rather than as excessive sources. SpikeballUnion 23:58, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linguistic research section's references could be moved to further reading 
Talk:Henry Joseph Nasiff Jr.

message: I think Hank deserves his own page, but it seems like there is stiff opposition to "Wack-packers" having their own pages. There is no need for two articles; one should redirect to the other. Probably "Henry Joseph Nastiff Jr." should just redirect to the "Wack Pack" page, where the article would be listed under "Hank the Angry Drunken Dwarf" Foday 21:34, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I think the pages should be merged

message: Foday 07:55, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I put the article under [[Hank the Angry Drunken Dwarf]], as that's how he's known.
Talk:World Barista Championship

message: * If anyone can post the competitors points, information about judging procedures, or other finalists, it would be highly appreciated! --Yakym 21:35, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006 comment

message: There is a list with all years and dates, and citation for every single one, or am i missing the point of the citation needed in the history section? 2001:9E8:36F0:2700:F513:BBA1:D52F:5719 (talk) 08:53, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed for the locations?
Talk:Red-Haired Shanks

message: I have removed the redirect of the talk page to Talk:List of One Piece characters. Note that there's active discussion at . --MarioGom (talk) 08:40, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please, use articles for deletion if you think the article should be deleted or redirected. Best, MarioGom (talk) 10:44, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm not a fan of that guideline since it doesn't encourage the remake of article. I just merged it cos these articles were already made rushed and tagged for lacking any information to stand on its own. I already tried discussing this but all the users kept ignoring every guideline and reverted my edits, resulting in a edit war.Tintor2 (talk) 14:36, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you blank redirect repeatedly and get reverted, you must seek consensus for your actions. The easiest way to build such consensus is articles for deletion. Repeatedly blanking the article is disruptive. Also, there is nothing preventing users from trying to improve the article in any way while it's being discussed at AfD. Reverting other users edits just because its notability is being discussed is not acceptable (see this diff: ). I would advise you to just wait for the outcome of the deletion discussion and stop disrupting other users' attempts to improve the article. MarioGom (talk) 18:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

text: I won't make another revert but already the talk page from the characters list seems to be against this type of article. Maybe once the next movie is released there might be more content to create one or whenever Shanks returns to the narrative.Tintor2 (talk) 18:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

text: I was the only one you warned though and there was no clear consensus about how is that this article was notable because there were other users who removed content and there was a notificiation of this article suffering from copyrights violations shortly after it was created so this still needs to cleaned especially since another used still tagged it for the same notabilty problem you do not seem aware to understand in the character list. I'll shut up since I'm tired of explaining it.Tintor2 (talk) 18:33, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed directed
Talk:Viluppuram (town)

message: Which way of spelling is correct, Viluppuram or Villuppuram? - Mirage5000 09:16, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Using the highly respected hits on Google method, I found that Villupuram got 334000 hits while Viluppuram got 32000. But the city's official site says Viluppuram, so I'm not sure. Can anyone clarify this? Damanmundine1 14:52, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Sorry, I've made a mess of the links here. Can somebody fix up the talk page so it's for the disambiguation, not the city? At the moment, if somebody goes to the disambig page, then the talk page, then back, they end up at the Viluppuram (city) article. Damanmundine1 13:22, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: Sorry for the cut and pasting instead of using the move feature. 
*Regarding this article Viluppuram (city), the place should never be defined as a city. City "definition" will contribute confusion among readers. By the way a "town" is larger than a village and smaller than a city. 
*In general local officials and general public always call this place as Viluppuram town. I honestly believe that this information should not be censored.
--Logic riches (talk) 03:43, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've had a read through Wikipedia's naming convention for places. It sounds to me as though we should perhaps rename the article as Viluppuram, Tamil Nadu. This would make it similar to the various Springfields. What do you think? I am not familiar with Indian geography. Would this be an appropriate way to refer to this town? (EhJJ)TALK 04:01, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Viluppuram (city) vs Viluppuram (town)
Talk:Paleomagnetism

message: Trying to find some info about paleomagnetism I stumbled over the cleanup-tag and obliged. I noticed several points:
* although the different remnant magnetisations are described quite well, there are no informations about the method of measuring it. I laid down the outlines in the source, but I'm only a poor, lonesome geologist
* there was some strange info on early misgivings of the methods, which I tried to change into a section about the historical development of the method and its application
* there are no real examples of the application of paleomagnetic measurements
* there is no word about the geophysical theories about the reasons for the magnetic field to change
* there is no word about apparent directional change, i.e. due to plate tectonic movements.
--Jo (talk) 22:10, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please add the contributions of Tanya Atwater, who discovered the relationship between paleomagnetism and plate tectonics. 172.76.77.97 (talk) 14:53, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  It depends what you mean by "the relationship between paleomagnetism and plate tectonics". Runcorn, Irving, Morley, Vine and Matthews did this before Atwater even received her bachelor's degree. GeoWriter (talk) 16:57, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing informations
Talk:Transport in Zimbabwe

message: hey i think some one should give more info about human geograpy of zimbabwe because teen have to write report but can find anything.  <<<<< unsigned comment
:That sentence was gramatically terrible.  And you might want to check out the article on Zimbabwe; and sign your comments.  Anyway, this article needs cleaned up and expanded.  I don't have the expertise or knowledge to do it, so this is a plea.  (I didn't put up the banner, either.) --MPD01605 (T / C) 05:47, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
--Jetstreamer  12:20, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived references not used in the article
Talk:HHV Latency Associated Transcript

message: Shouldn't the information pertaining to the retracted journal article be deleted from the page? It seems like it has little to no merit if the paper was retracted, and therefore is baseless, misleading conjecture.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.185.69.207 (talk) 03:25, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of Retracted Information

message: In my opinion, there should not be a category for articles  which are too technical.  Rather, there should be articles which are intentionally more technical, but they should have intros which point the reader to an overview topic that corresponds to the technical page.  For example, HHV LAT could be the general page and HHV LAT (Technical) could be the deliberately technical page.  Or, the technical page HHV LAT could begin with a template that contains a link to the section on HHV that is generally about LAT.
Any deliberately technical page should be required to reference a generalist page.  Doesn't that sound more like it would advance civilization than demanding 'dumbed down' content?  The current standard of 'too technical' implies that the wikipedia can only, well, get technical to a limited extent.  ManVhv 06:29, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Too-Technical Articles
Talk:Revere, Missouri

message: The following was added and much was sourced to an unpublished work. I have removed unconfirmed facts from the article, as it cannot be confirmed.
:Founded on October 22, 1887 by the Santa Fe Railroad, Revere was originally named "Hoopup". The town was "probably named in honor of Paul Revere."du Gard, René Coulet; du Gard, Dominique Coulet (1974). The handbook of French place names in the U.S.A., p. 133. Onomastica, Issue 51. Editions des Deux Mondes During the period prior to 1900, Revere flourished as an intermediate stop for the railroad.Higgins, Charles A. (1894). New guide to the Pacific coast: Santa Fé route. California, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, Kansas, Missouri, Iowa, and Illinois. Rand, McNally  During its commercial peak at this time there were three grocery stores, three churches (Revere Cumberland Presbyterian, Revere Baptist and Revere Methodist), three doctors, pool hall, mortuary, barber shop, print shop, blacksmith, furniture store, implement store, hatchery, Masonic Hall (with vaudeville shows in the basement), harness shop, hotel and livery stable.
:In 1898, J.H. Talbott of Luray started the Revere Current, a weekly newspaper that consisted of five pages of world and local news including advertisements, train schedule and local markets.  Circulation closed on July 18, 1901 when Talbott left for law school.
:In 1902, the first telephone was installed. In 1912, the Bank of Revere was established and remained open until its closing in 1951.  In 1931, a major fire destroyed five businesses.
Comments welcome Jokestress (talk) 23:27, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced information
Talk:Groff Conklin

message: According to GoodReads, second paragraph at https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/57170.Groff_Conklin, the photo here supposedly of Groff Conklin is actually that of Timothy Doyle. I am unsure how to correct this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dan Quigley (talk • contribs) 16:14, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Photo
Talk:International rankings of the United States

message: I propose merging United States rankings into this page as they are talking about substantially the same content. Killian441 (talk) 17:57, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing no opposition, I will merge the two articles. Killian441 (talk) 19:58, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Why did you remove the rankings table from this article? Jarble (talk) 18:53, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: To make it easier to edit the individual entries and keep the data up-to-date. (Heroeswithmetaphors) talk 21:49, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rankings table 
Talk:Prabhas

message: Please make sure to edit that salar is a bilinguial movie which is been made with telugu as well as in kannada 2405:204:5394:62E5:7EF7:2222:FB0D:3CB0 (talk) 01:19, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please seek consensus at Talk:Salaar -- Ab207 (talk) 09:16, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: SALAAR 2409:40E6:1E:A3DA:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 12:32, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salaar is bilingual project 

message: hi sir, some edit need for page. Gamerr222 (talk) 19:05, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:08, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 September 2022 

message: Credits:
* Gulf Media called him Legendary Actor
* Forbes called him next Harison Ford
* Italy media called him Decaprio
* Won Russian Heart Award 
* Fan clubs in China and Japan 
* Americans called Tollywood is Prabhas 
   Land
* First Non English Actor in Royal Albert 
   Hall
* Wax Statue at Madem Thussads 2406:B400:D4:5873:B41C:10FF:FEA9:EE72 (talk) 18:34, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: , not encyclopedic, reads like WP:TRIVIA. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (talk) 05:22, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 October 2022 

message: {There's an error in the full name and can be corrected by editing the word 'Suryanarayana' to "Satyanarayana",which is the actual name of prabhas VinayVarma 007 (talk) 15:58, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Prabhas himself says 'Suryanarayana' in the interview  between 3:00 and 3:15. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:25, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: well maybe it's a misunderstanding or some material error.But I still request you to go through some deep sources.Do not take it as any personal blame and if you felt insecure I do apologise for that🙏 VinayVarma 007 (talk) 17:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: How is it material error when the subject himself said Suryanarayana in the interview? It is obvious Prabhas knows more about himself than us Wikipedia editors. So . - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:33, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 October 2023 

message: Salaar became 5th prabhas film to collect more than 100crore in hindi belt.
source: https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/movie/salaar/box-office/
https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/celebrity/prabhas/box-office/#bh-micro-tab-content
https://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/telugu-cinema/salaar-becomes-5th-prabhas-film-100-crore-hindi-baahubali-2-adipurush-saaho-101703935723593.html DSB33 (talk) 12:49, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Rehsarb (talk) 17:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 December 2023
Talk:Majokko Megu-chan

message: Is there any particluar reason why the article titles has Megu (a proper name) in lower case? Shiroi Hane 22:23, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no logical reason for it.  I fixed it for you; in future, you can fix such things by using the `move' tab at the top of the page. Elric of Grans 23:13, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 
Talk:Table Rock, Missouri

message: I was looking for an address for Table Rock.  The Taney County Clerk knew nothing about the village.  The city clerk's office of Branson had no information.  I finally got hold of the last elected (in 2003) trustee, who says he moved away five years ago and that the village was dissolved and annexed into Branson.Fitzaubrey (talk) 23:12, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tightwad, Missouri

message: Removed from article for not having any sources of any kind that I can find:
:The village's unusual name is said to stem from an episode in which a store owner cheated a customer, gouging him for an extra fifty cents. Some sources claim the transaction involved a watermelon, others a rooster.
-- nae'blis 18:36, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It might be worth mentioning that the Tightwad Bank is an extension of the Reading State Bank in Reading, KS, as the wiki article shows that the bank was opened in 2008, but the bank website referred to states that the bank was founded in 1900. This discrepancy may cause some confusion or distrust, and should probably be clarified.
-- x82hammer28x 21:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've rearranged, expanded, and properly referenced the subsection on Tightwad Bank. While I'm somewhat uneasy about violating Wiki policy on business advertising, I feel the unusual nature of the name and its pop culture status makes it worthy of inclusion. Sector001 (talk) 22:43, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name section removed pending sources 

message: The former is in the opening paragraph, but the latter figure appears elsewhere. I suspect the 64 is a typo but don't know for sure.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wschart (talk • contribs) 21:47, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  64 or 69? 
Talk:Dot and the Kangaroo

message: I think the page should split to differentiate between the book and films. Thoughts? Annie D 00:40, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. So I'll just move the movie infobox down and put the book infobox. -- Annie D 01:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: This section claims that the film contains a number of alleged drug references. Are there any sources for this? If none can be provided, the section should be removed as original research. Terraxos (talk) 12:35, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed as still unreferenced. Somno (talk) 07:33, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Controversy' section

message: Dot & the Kangaroo was serialised (with illustrations iirc) in the British magazine& tape partwork Storyteller,   in the early '80s. Possibly an abridged version? - was over about 3 issues, had part the story in the mag and somebody reading it on the tape. 109.224.137.121 (talk) 17:06, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adapted/serialised in Story Teller
Talk:The twelve pyramids

message: This page is an organizational mess with subjective use of language. It desperately needs to be cleaned up and rewritten. The boxes with the single links in them simply have to go. I don't know where to begin on editing this. I do not have the background to do a good job here. Expert attention needed. --Lendorien 00:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup needed