Talk:Gas to liquids

message: It's normally used as the plural "gas-to-liquids", because it produces different liquids at the same time. Does anybody object?  ObsidianOrder 04:23, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: should be pluralized

message: This article seems to imply that the only MTG reaction is that using the zeolite catalyst.  While that's surely the most popular (and possibly the only one used industrially), there are others.  For instance, Donald Pearson first showed that it could be done with polyphosphoric acid, and at lower temperatures.  
(In the interest of disclosure, I'm only interested in this subject because I work with such a mechanism.  I most likely wouldn't even know about it otherwise...  Should that indicate that the material isn't noteworthy?)  --Maebnus 04:31, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate pathways? 

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 07:55, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: What´s the difference between those two aircrafts, I know that Tu-155 run alternate fuel on one
of three engines, what about the A380?
RGDS
Alexmcfire  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexmcfire (talk • contribs) 01:22, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A380 vs Tu-155

message: It's faster to convert biomass to methanol via low-oxygen combustion, than it is to use fermentation to convert sugars to ethanol. Low-oxygen combustion also works with cellulose and lignin whereas efficient fermentation has not yet been invented. So this gas-to-liquids approach looks like the right solution, producing drop-in usable liquid fuels from both natural gas and biomass. What disadvantages does it have?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.183.110.93 (talk) 03:58, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Biomass Feedstock

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Gas to liquids. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711130520/http://velocys-files.gripmanager.com/news_item/pdf/67/Think_Small_for_Associated_Gas.pdf to http://velocys-files.gripmanager.com/news_item/pdf/67/Think_Small_for_Associated_Gas.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120807005847/http://compactgtl.com/commercial-plants/petrobras-commercial-demonstration-plant/ to http://compactgtl.com/commercial-plants/petrobras-commercial-demonstration-plant/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:46, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: From the introduction: "Direct partial combustion has been demonstrated in nature but not replicated commercially. Technologies reliant on partial combustion have been commercialized mainly in regions where natural gas is inexpensive." Sounds like a contradiction to me. And just what does the term 'nature' mean here? 50.39.173.185 (talk) 14:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nature?