lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ctags

message: I'm unsure whether to do a link to object (computer science) at the first mention of 'object'. -- towo 15:55, 2004 Jun 19 (UTC)
:Done. -- Heptite (T) (C) (@) 21:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Objectify

message: I've added sections for etags (from Emacs) which needs expansion, and Exuberant Ctags.  I don't know if there are others but if there are they need to be added.  Also it might be helpful to have some specific information on the original ctags utility.  -- Heptite (T) (C) (@) 21:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ctags variants

message: is it really necessary to list a bunch of editors supporting ctags? should we limit the list to a few -- or perhaps simply omit listing editors with ctags support? the list as it is now is a mess. Ehamberg (talk) 12:48, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe the whole list could be replaced with just a link to Comparison of text editors? (Although the table does not clearly show if each editor supports ctags or some other similar database.) --PauliKL (talk) 15:06, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess that could work, but as you say: those lists doesn't clearly show if they support ctags or something else. anything is better than status quo, though.... Ehamberg (talk) 16:23, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: List of editors

message: "pcwalton github repository for jsctags" is 404. Could point to https://github.com/ramitos/jsctags  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2804:7F7:A68D:70EF:0:0:0:4 (talk) 02:31, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Deprecated jsctags
Talk:Nueva Galicia

message: This almost seems as if it was hastily translated from another language. Or should I just get a bit more sleep? ;)--Lucky13pjn 02:21, Jun 20, 2004 (UTC)
The second sentence is very difficult to understand. Do the wikilinks really point to the right article? // Habj 16:28, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This page is not history, but history-fiction !
1) "Spanish exploration of the area began in 1531 with Nuño Beltrán de Guzmán's expedition."
You forget some facts : Guzman had been president of the Audiencia of Mexico (1528-1530), he was sacked in 1530 and he created his own "kingdom" as a challenge against the authorities of Mexico, notably Hernán Cortés. He was arrested in 1536 after the arrival of the viceroy Antonio de Mendoza.
2) "Instead, Queen Joanna — at the moment the acting regent of Spain"
Queen Joanna, aka Joanna the Mad : theoretically she was not the regent, but the queen of Spain as the daughter of Isabelle and Ferdinand, but her son Charles (Charles I of Castila and emperor Charles V) was officially co-king of Spain since Ferdinand's death (1516). Practically, she was sort of prisoner in a monastery, and the true king and regent was Charles. Jcqrcd44 (talk) 09:07, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistakes and omissions
Talk:Tongue

message: The hat note in the previous version was too wordy and had the link to Language, which is not the primary topic here (not quite irrelevant, only a small section pertains to the topic). Most people in search of the word "tongue" would most likely be the anatomy. People would search language on its own. I added a simple  template to direct users to the tongue disambiguation page, a standard practice on wiki (which happens to contain the Language link). Tinton5 (talk) 06:10, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hat note
Talk:Project Pitchfork

message: As per discussion on Talk:Assemblage 23 and Category talk:Goth, removing from Category:Goth and adding to List of non-goth musical artists popular within goth subculture. - Korpios 02:08, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Perhaps it would be worth saying that these should not be confused with the other names on the darkwave scene that are 'Pro-jekt' and 'Projekt Records' that are both unrelated? J Milburn 21:36, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been done already by now :o) --Bisco (talk) 20:10, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not to be confused with...

message: All the songs/album titles need to be wikiformated, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/MUSTARD/Format. --Bisco (talk) 20:10, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiformat 

message: Is it appropriate to make edits to this article for present tense/past tense correction?  Send with standard English usage of date format 
I’m guessing it was converted into English. I’m not a frequent wiki user.   Mikebellman (talk) 17:51, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits for tense? 
Talk:The Men Who Killed Kennedy

message: Per WP:FILMPLOT, I am removing much of the "Contents of the documentaries" as a partial revert of this edit by an editor who originally entitled the section "Contents of the three banned documentaries". Wikipedia:How to write a plot summary is a good reference for someone who wishes to rewrite these sections in appropriate prose. Location (talk) 05:49, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Contents
Talk:The High Crusade

message: The synopsis is kinda strange. It feels as if the author hasn't read the book for a while...
During the talks, Baron de Tourneville ignores the truce
The book makes a particular point that a truce *wasnt* agreed
With Lady Catherine, Sir Roger's wife, Montbelle corners the baron and demands that he help the people of Ansby get back to Earth.
Again a particular point is that Montbelle plans to abandon the common people and go back to earth to take power in conjunction with the Wersgorix.
there are others, but the synposis has been around along time, didn't want to just rewrite, just present an alternative view
Baen books did not exist in 1960 as it was founded by Jim Baen in 1983. See the section titled "About Jim Baen" at:
http://www.baen.com/FAQS.htm#About%20Jim%20Baen 
The first edition, of 1960, of the High Crusade was published by Doubleday. Just type High crusade on a title search at the Library of Congress, where the book was originally deposited in 1960:
http://catalog.loc.gov/
:OK. --Merovingian ↕ T@Lk 01:12, Jun 21, 2004 (UTC)
I'm not really sure what the purpose of having the name of the book in German right at the beginning was, so I removed that comment J. Passepartout
::In regards to the original date of publication, I have in front of me now a copy of the British edition of Astounding Science Fact & Fiction, dated November 1960 in which the first part of this story appears serialised, and I happened to look up this article, firstly just to see whether the Story had one, and what it might say if so, the story being a favorite of mine. I see here that the original date is listed as 1960 published by Doubleday, and that the source for this information appears to be the Library of Congress entry as noted above, this entry does not list a month as far as I can tell. Knowing that the British edition of Astounding reprinted the earlier American edition, though not sure by how much, I've looked this up and found that the first part had been serialised in the July 1960 edition of the American; Astounding Science Fiction: Vol. XLV No. 5 (July 1960), (which is only the cover date of course, magazines tending to be dated ahead I believe). This information should be integrated into the article, and it noted as possibly the first publication, considering the dates. Unless there is some further way to shed light on this matter? Here's one of the links found via google;(apologies for the slightly stilted tone of this message I've been reading old pulp sci-fi for a couple of hours :) ) Number36 (talk) 07:07, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just saw that this is in the Trivia section, but I think it's a bit too significant to be labeled as trivia, and should be noted in the first paragraph. Also how does this info relate to the doubleday 1960 date of publication, because at present the article appears to contradict itself.Number36 (talk) 21:09, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synopsis
Talk:Scottish Parliament

message: Citation 109 does not lead to the intended destination. 2A02:C7E:5423:6600:D42C:A4F6:B837:6123 (talk) 22:59, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link issue. 

message: The goverment should be Greens and SNP as two ministers are greens. I tried to change it to that but it didn’t work is anyone able to put them both under goverment? GothicGolem29 (talk) 18:54, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greens in goverment.
Category talk:American children's writers

message: "Julie Andrews Edwards" is in italics for some reason and I have no idea how to fix it. anonymous  
11:32, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it's because Julie Andrews Edwards is only a redirect page that leads to Julie Andrews. It looks like the category may have been placed on the redirect page as a test or something, but as her real article is in :Category:English children's writers, I'll remove this category from from the redirect. Aitch Eye 14:49, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  formatting (name in italics)
Talk:Monsanto

message: This article does not mention that Monsanto acquire Ortho from Chevron in the 1980s. Thiss gave Monsanto both a toehold in home-use gardening and landscaping chemicals, but also a brandname that consumers liked a lot. Fetz the chemist (talk) 01:00, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ortho was bought by Monsanto
Talk:Jutsu (Naruto)

message: In several places in the article, there are inner links from words that are concepts that exist in naruto, to articles with the same name that refer to concepts from the traditional Japanese folklore, such as: Kamui, Tsukuyomi, Amaterasu and Susanoo. I don't think these inner links should be, so if no one here argues otherwise I will delete those links in a few days from now. Orielno (talk) 09:31, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inner links to articles regarding Japanese Folklore
Category talk:Conductors (music)

message: There's a list at List of conductors that should be used to tag people for this category. --Jerzy(t) 05:51, 2004 Jun 20 (UTC)
: What happened to List of conductors ?  I worked on that page a lot.  Now it doesn't come up on "go" or "search" and is in red instead of blue.  Abstrator 22:26, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe FordPrefect42, AKA The Owner of Truth, has decided that your list is not good and he changed it. This "gentleman" just uncategorized around 30 conductors i categorized as "conductors" --Karljoos (talk) 16:20, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: List of conductors

message: Shouldn't this be a subcategory of musicians by instrument? J Lorraine 09:50, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recategorize

message: This still remains a bizarre addition of "(music)" In ictu oculi (talk) 05:26, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: As opposed to electrical conductors...
Talk:Kris Aquino

message: Given that Corazon Aquino (her mother), Benigno Aquino Jr. (her father), Benigno Aquino III (his brother), and Servillano Aquino (her great-grandfather) had played a part in Philippine history (not to mention the notoriety of political families in the Philippines), I could propose the inclusion of an extended information section about Kris Aquino's family, but do you think that said section would either satisfy FA criteria 1B (as long as the extended family info is written in respect to the article's subject) or become WP:OFFTOPIC? LunafreyaLaphicet (talk) 09:51, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: From reading the article, an extended family section would not be relevant as it is covered in her early life. If she had gone into politics it would be so. Sciencefish (talk) 10:01, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean that if Kris Aquino (or any other celebrity or otherwise high-profile individual born under political families) is (or was) politically active, then the extended family info can satisfy FA criteria 1B. Am I correct? LunafreyaLaphicet (talk) 10:27, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. I believe so. Sciencefish (talk) 11:38, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Appreciate it. Cheers. LunafreyaLaphicet (talk) 11:43, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should extended family info of Kris Aquino satisfy FA criteria 1B?
Talk:Machine press

message: Enormous scope for improvement, major reformatting via sections and dedicated links  — Graibeard 01:07, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've ended up at this article a few times and it's always bugged me, so I finally tried to make some edits.  Removed what looked like a spam link, cleaned up the writing a bit, and removed some unsourced facts that didn't seem relevant anyway.  Hopefully it's at least a start. — Kadin2048 (talk) 04:49, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Old

message: I agree with graibeard. Title "machine press" is not in common usage. "Press" with perhaps a disambiguation word in parentheses would be preferable. Wilhkar (talk) 21:20, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it's a possibility. Right now, there is only one ref, so I'd like to see more refs so I could get a feel for the terminology across multiple publications. Wizard191 (talk) 17:05, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 
Talk:Journey of the Magi

message: The Journey of the Magi recently survived vfd. See: Talk:The Journey of the Magi/Delete -- Wile E. Heresiarch 08:11, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [ WP:VfD ]

message: The poem's actually called "Journey of the Magi".  The fact that there is no definitive article like "the", or even an "a" shows that the metaphorical/spiritual of the journey has not ended, and so as it is not yet in the past, there cannot be a "the".
Just thought that was important.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.152.0.37 (talk) 21:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: The text of the poem is available at: http://www.poemhunter.com/poem/the-journey-of-the-magi/ ,
but I am quite sure that since the poet only died in 1965 it would still be under copyright.
(http://www.poemhunter.com/PoemHunter/show.asp?p=Copyright/inc_copyright.htm )
Is there a Wikipedia linking policy?
Mfgreen 02:56, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting copyright policy of Poem Hunter.  You need permission (and prior permission at that) to copy anything of their's but they publish anything and the owner has to hunt down their poem and say stop.  Also, Poem Hunter claims permission to publish anything that is sent them even without knowledge that the owner has read their copyright and permission policy.  WikiParker 12:07, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Text 

message: To briefly preface, I have an elementary grasp of Latin so forgive me if I am wrong. This article quotes "...in solsitio brumali, the very dead of winter." The Latin word 'solsitio', should presumably be 'solstitio': in the solstice. Checking the given source 'solsitio' is also written. After consulting a few dictionaries and wiktionary as well 'solsitio' does not seem to be a common alternative or an alternative at all. If it is incorrect, I believe it could be a simple spelling error in the original written manuscript http://anglicanhistory.org/lact/andrewes/v1/sermon15.html (as the manuscript also contains some interesting spelling variations like Jerosolymam for Jerusalem) that was faithfully transcribed onto the cited webpage as that is the purpose of that webpage. However if it is an error would it be worth noting? I know this is probably a very minute detail but I have been thinking about it for some time. Note I have not altered the actual article page.
Mr.Sagdiyev (talk) 05:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin Spelling Error?
Talk:Paul Waaktaar-Savoy

message: Scanty discussion of early life now put at the beginning of the article. Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 16:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early life?
Talk:Sexual pleasure

message: Currently it is going to Sexual arousal, but most of the time in the past it has gone to orgasm. Which also to me seems like a more natural location. As such I'll be changing it back to that, if anybody disagrees please use the opportunity here on this page to discuss why. Cheerio. Mathmo Talk 15:14, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where should it redirect to?
Talk:List of Castlevania characters

message: OK, I'm coming to this pretty cold, having never played the games; I arrived at the article looking for context behind something someone else said in relation to the characters.
The Alucard entry, as it stands, is confusing; it says he was originally the son of Gabriel and Maria Belmont ... but later in the section a magic mirror shows him who his father, Gabriel, really was, and he takes pity on him ... at which point Dracula realises he's his son? I really feel like I'm missing something, as there's nothing else anywhere in the article that points to a blood link between them, or indeed any hint that Dracula is actually Gabriel or vice versa. They appear to be two wholly separate characters (from different games, even), so... wtf? Was Alucard actually Dracula's son who was adopted by the Belmonts, or were Gabriel and Maria actually Dracula and Lisa in disguise, or what? 146.199.0.170 (talk) 15:52, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dracula = Gabriel?
Talk:Greylag goose

message: "Gula, a forerunner of the Sumerian fertility goddess Ishtar"? Has the author of this sentence read a single book about Mesopotamian mythology written over the course of last five decades or so? Gula only appears in the Ur III period, Sumerian Inanna is attested for as long as writing and AKKADIAN Ishtar since the pre-Sargonic period, I am not sure how this claim even works chronologically, putting the fact these are completely separate goddesses aside. I also do not think there is much evidence for association between Gula and any waterfowl - Nanshe, sure; Ninimma and Ningal, maybe; but Gula? Also, "fertility" goddess? Surgeries are "fertility" now? Does "fertility goddess" just mean "happens to be female"? HaniwaEnthusiast (talk) 10:34, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baffling information about Mesopotamian deities
Talk:Lyndon LaRouche/Archive 1

message: I'm not sure this is really relevant to the article but I had the surprise this evening of seeing billboards promoting Larouche's campaign for presidency in my very own street! _R_ 02:47, 17 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Lar's theories are absurdly complicated, but he says over and over again that he's opposed to fascism, so if he's accused of fascism then we have to show how his overall philosophy contradicts his statements. Anything we can put down in this article to make sense of Lar's philosophies is a good thing, in my book, because it's really easy to get lost in them. I don't understand your confusion. This is basically responding to a possible argument that Lar's philosophies aren't based on traditional fascist philosophers and therefore can't be fascist. There was a whole other section below this...IMO this article has too many opinions, too many maybes, too many people editing it in contradictory ways. it's a morass. wiki is a failed concept. Vaketer
Thanks for the clarification. I have no problem with moving the part about fascism back into the article. Perhaps it could be reworded to include the context that you describe above, namely how LaRouche's beliefs allegedly bely his public claims. I prefer to think of this page not as a demonstration of wiki's failures, but that a good article takes time, because it is still be in flux. By editing the page you've helped improve it, so thanks. :-) Wmahan. 18:52, 2004 Apr 9 (UTC)
Jesus christ. some fool with too much time on their hands got rid of the useful link, to the Age article about the CEC trying to psychologically break down its members, and added useless links. Freaking fools. Edit, edit, edit, it doesn't matter if it makes sense. Or if you know what you're doing. Deleting the link is royally stupid. (vak)
I moved the section below out of "cult accusations", because it has no relevance to "cult accusations", and seems to me to be another case of pov speculation. The LaRouche youth on campus also denounce the colleges for wretched academic standards. It is important to keep in mind the distinction between Wikipedia and USENET. --Herschelkrustofsky 19:43, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:Polski Fiat 126p

message: Dear Authors,
Let me draw your attention to the fact the "Polish Fiat 126p" is only the English translation of Polski Fiat, a trademark used in Poland between the World Wars and after World War II, in connection with cars built in Poland under the licence of Fiat.
I think it would be better to use this name as the title of this Wiki article and "Polish Fiat" should be given as an explanation only.
Best regards
Millisits
I believe the last 126p had an original flat-twin engine instead of the original straight-twin of the Italian 126. Can somebody confirm ? Ericd 21:22, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of the article 

message: This car was known in Yugoslavia as Zastava 126 PGL. Was it imported from Poland and rebranded, or was it produced in Zastava factory in Kragujevac? --romanm (talk) 22:06, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Late reply :) But, that particular model was made after Fiat's license in Zastava as well even though many of those were imported from Poland. So really, both. It was similar with some other Fiat's cars. --Dejan Čabrilo 07:38, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zastava 126 PGL 

message: I think the photo of the car with the missing wheels is silly and unnecessary.  The other photograph suffices.  I'll remove it if no one objects. Appleseed 19:06, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Succinic acid

message: I'd need to do more research before editing the article but I do know succinic acid is used by some people as a cheating agent for heavy metals. It is also claimed  to be effective for teething relief through the use of amber jewelry. 
Succinic acid is contained in cigarettes
Also found in McDonald's Barbecue Sauce  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.41.163.230 (talk) 16:32, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I only have a basic knowledge of Chemistry, so maybe my problem is just lack of knowledge. However, it seems wrong to have "Sodium succinate" redirect to Succinic acid. Sodium succinate has a different CAS Registry Number: 150-90-3, a different chemical structure, and should have different data points in the infobox. If it is better to combine the pages, there should at least be a separate section giving the differences so people don't get confused.
BrotherE (talk) 23:48, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Your suggestion was followed.  Thanks.  We dont have enough info to produce an article on the salts yet. --Smokefoot (talk) 04:11, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sodium Succinate 

message: requested pp. Jytdog (talk) 23:08, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  pp
Talk:Yaser Arafat International Airport

message: Is this airport really called "Yaser Arafat I.A."?  First off, I seem to recall that when it opened, some enthusiastic PA officials called it that, but the idea was nixed by Arafat himself.  I suppose it could have been renamed after he died, but I'm guessing they would have spelled it right (Yasser, not Yaser). --Jfruh 02:44, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The offical web site calls it that, with the same spelling.  Of course the real name is in Arabic so you can't really say that the spelling is incorrect.  --Zero 03:28, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arafat?
Talk:Society Hill, South Carolina

message: Mayor Dwayne Duke aka Duke 
Elected by the people for the people! 2600:1004:B0AF:4E65:186F:C31B:7E7B:A1FF (talk) 05:12, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 06:40, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 January 2022