lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Grady Ward

message: "...Moby Thesaurus, has more than 2.5 million synonyms and related words, making it the largest thesaurus in the English language...[1]"
"...Moby Shakespeare, which has been credited as being the most widely distributed works of Shakespeare in the world.[2]..."
The [1] and [2] footnotes lead to web sites at which I searched many pages and could find no substantiation for either of these claims.
47.214.177.17 (talk) 13:54, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsubstantiated Claims

message: This article needs a new opening sentence which tells us who Mr. Ward is. Thanks. Steve Dufour 15:09, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no problem with the SFC getting the story wrong, or the details changing through the various court actions—that's happened frequently—but it need references, and yes, they should be third party if possible. I'll keep looking for others  and I suggest that you do as well. AndroidCat 01:49, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New opening sentence

message: This litigation consisted of more than 1500 federal court docket items (a docket item is either a motion with exhibits and briefs or an order from the bench, including oppositions and rebuttals) and two visits to the Ninth Circuit court of appeals, which include their own set of motions, oppositions, and rebuttals. Therefore this entry must remain a *summary* entry rather than an exhaustive review of lesser importance particular motions or counter-motions because of the lack of context, which makes then misleading. And to supply such context for the details of the litigation would make this entry an encyclopedia unto itself. 
Therefore the framework, allegations, and ultimate factual disposition of the case is presented without citing individual sub-motions, which of course can be presented here in the edit history (such as the actual settlement agreement). Grady Ward is reachable at grady.ward@gmail.com if in need of specific documents or recollections. 
For the record, I agree with Mr. Sasser's note that Mr. Ward complained about Scientology litigants alleged attempts to thwart the settlement agreement contrary to the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing that must accompany every California contract. It is just that the significance of this article will be hidden if it is submerged with too much litigation detail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.109.140.135 (talk) 22:17, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversing SeanSasser's coda of a particular motion 

message: I have not heard from Grady in over 15 years. Is he still living? The biography does not have an "end date" so I assume he's still out there. Damotclese (talk) 23:02, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did He Die?
Talk:Elgin Cathedral

message: I think this article should be peer reviewed, and possibly nominated for featured article status, well done to all the contibutors! — PMJ 12:52, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: FA

message: 1. Well written. Clear prose and layout.
2. Accurate and verifiable. Footnotes from reliable sources.
3. Broad. Major topics are covered with no unnecessary details.
4. Neutral.
5. Stable.
6. Images. Appropriate with fair use rationale.
Well done. Agree with above.  This is FA material. -- SECisek 01:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Review

message: Can someone clarify the meaning of the dates in the infobox?  We have:
* Cathedral church established   	fl. x1114-1127x11311224 (in present location)
and later:
* Diocese established   	x1114-1127x1131
It's far from clear to me what these mean.  What are all the xes about?  Can these be translated into a form that will be clear to the average reader?  TSP 14:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date format in infobox 

message: Hi, I have been asked to give my opinion on whether this article is ready for a shot at FAC. I think that while it is a very good article, I'm afraid that there are a number of problems that might delay or fail an FAC nomination. I do however think that the article is close to the standard required and that only a few changes are needed, listed below.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:07, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review by Jackyd101 

message: There's a harv error with Cowan 1967. Curly Turkey (gobble) 02:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: a what? -- Aunva6talk - contribs  03:10, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: There is apparently no citation that points to Cowan 1967—either the reference wasn't used or a citation template in the body has an error in it. Curly Turkey (gobble) 03:54, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: not sure where it would be, but i think cite template errors are usually very obvious. -- Aunva6talk - contribs  06:06, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The error shows up under the User:Ucucha/HarvErrors script. Curly Turkey (gobble) 06:11, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harv error 

message: Just wanted to note how impressed I am with this article. In particular, the table of figures at the bottom is very useful, but the whole article is detailed. Well done! Brutannica (talk) 04:41, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Great job!
Talk:The Valentines (doo-wop band)

message: I added the {POV} tag.  The following is in the header - "Although they never had a record on the national hit parades, they were extremely popular in New York and the East Coast in general and had many regional big sellers. The stage performances of the group were sellouts and their harmonizing and choreography in sequence were amongst the most accomplished of their time. Influenced both musically and in their showmanship by The Cadillacs, The Solitaires, and The Flamingos, The Valentines were able to contribute an innovative stage presentation, outstanding vocals, and some unique performances."
References / citations are needed, as this style is repeated throughout; or - as seems more likely - a much more neutral point of view is required by sub-editors. Thank you,
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 14:52, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 21:18, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Cavite State University

message: There doesn't seem to be any particular reason the two can't be merged. Merging them would help to make the topic as a whole more complete as both articles are very short. ialsoagree (talk) 16:28, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article above has been deleted. ialsoagree (talk) 18:01, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Guild of United Leaders]] 

message: What is the mascot of Cavite State University? 136.158.82.41 (talk) 03:36, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CVSU main mascot
Talk:Tales from the Vienna Woods

message: Wouldn't it be better to change this page to a disambiguation page and make a different article for each meaning of the name?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.162.247.179 (talk) 20:39, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really. There's already Tales from the Vienna Woods (play). What's needed is trimming here and transferring some content there. That would leave this article only about the Strauss waltz. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:24, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split article
Talk:Prayer of Saint Ephrem

message: Quote: "The most common practice has one after each line of the prayer, then twelve in silence, followed by one at the end of a repeat of the entire prayer."
:I don't know about other Churches but in Russian OC twelve prostrations are done with prayer "Боже, очисти мя грешнаго" (I'm not sure about translation, maybe: "God, clean me the sinner"), talking/speaking it in low/hushed tones or to oneself.  --Koryakov Yuri 13:02, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the tip, I've incorporated it into the article! InfernoXV 13:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

text: In the Russian Orthodox practice that I've seen (ROCOR), the words, "O God, cleanse me a sinner." (typical English translation) are said softly by the priest as everyone makes metanias (bows at the waist). The last (twelfth time) he adds, "...and have mercy on me." Though this last addition is not written in the service books, it does help all of those present to know that it was the last bow. MishaPan 02:38, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you kindly! InfernoXV 05:15, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Interestingly. In Moscow all is the same but without this last addition. --Koryakov Yuri 13:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Very interesting! I've noted that down, and also noted what appears in the 1639 Sluzhebnik of St Peter Mohyla published in Kiev. InfernoXV 15:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This article seems to imply that only the Old Believers use the form with "take from me" and "despondency/faint-heartedness", but I know in the OCA we use this form (http://oca.org/orthodoxy/prayers/lenten-prayer-of-st.-ephrem), and goarch.org (http://www.goarch.org/resources/prayers/saint_ephrem) and antiochian.org (http://antiochian.org/saint_ephraim) both have this form on their websites as well, which to me implies that this is the version they use. Can anyone confirm or deny this? Silentquasar (talk) 05:08, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Version used in English-speaking churches 

message: the section of comparison between Greek and Russian seems like a lot of original research, without source.
Why do we have all those other languages?  Those would be reasonable in the respective language versions of Wikipedia. I can see the OCS if in fact the difference between the English from the Greek and the English from the OCS was significant, but I don't see that it is.  Unless someone has written an article somewhere making it significant. Which would be a source.--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 19:37, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  comparison of Greek and Russian 
Talk:Sunshine (1999 film)

message: Yo  (or anyone who can help), I see you readded that "District IX" bit in the caption. I took that out because I looked up and down and couldn't find any RS in Google Books or Google News to that address. You added a ref to Google Maps- but is this a WP:RS? The citation doesn't seem to be formatted, either. Ribbet32 (talk) 23:36, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey,  I freely admit I copied from a previous editor's input, and RS is a challenge.  We do, however, have the photo from Wikimedia, and the streetview from Google Maps does provide confirmation, so (somewhat) okay for now.  However, a legit RS will stand the test of time, in anticipation of the "obvious" writing on the building getting painted over someday (just lucky it has stayed for 18 years).  I'll try searching as well - but might need help from a Hungarian editor, in case it is only sourced in an new article from there. Jmg38 (talk) 06:28, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

text: - I found a newspaper article specifically discussing the building, its use in the film, its 2008 restoration and the local government's decision to keep the Sonnenschein company name on the façade!  Have added this to the article.  Thanks for the push to do a better job on the integrity of the article. Jmg38 (talk) 19:19, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  That's fantastic! Thanks so much! Ribbet32 (talk) 22:21, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sonnenschein mansion photo
Talk:AC/DC: Let There Be Rock

message: The wiki article about the Pavillon de Paris says that the filmed Dec 9 1977 Paris concerts were part of the Highway To Hell tour. The Pavillon de Paris article references a write-up by Blockbuster video by way of support.  However, this article says that those Paris concerts were part of the Let There Be Rock tour.  Can someone explain the discrepency?
Thanks! JayUSA  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.110.190.250 (talk) 23:04, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion over Paris tour dates / tour names
Talk:Die Krupps

message: I think that the term "Electropunk" has nothing to do with Die Krupps. Their genre is clear as day, the EBM beginnings and the Industrial Metal later. --Cjepo (talk) 23:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. ƕ (talk) 16:47, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's unsourced self fellating nonsense. 121.210.33.50 (talk) 21:50, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think a PR agent wrote this.
Talk:Garage Days

message: Were some good tunes, the soundtrack seems slightly less terrible than the film. http://www.amazon.com/Garage-Days-Various-Artists/dp/B00006NSD4 
Might be worth mentioning if anyone wants to expand the article.  Also the short description at All Movie Guide is pretty good. -- Horkana (talk) 00:11, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tralee

message: can you explain why a set of "decorative sacristy doors" is relevant for an article about a town? Their is a short mention about the church, why the elaborate reference to the doors? The Banner talk 21:12, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I get the eery feeling that you are promoting his work all over Wikipedia. The Banner talk 21:15, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

text: Are you working for the National Gallery of Ireland? The Banner talk 21:49, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

text: And is it not a better idea to inform the local parish directly about the artwork instead trying to reach them through Wikipedia? The Banner talk 21:55, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Glad to see it is referenced now. I'm happy to see editors like Dublin8david contributing in a field that they know alot about. It's good to know that Tralee has a work by Michael Healy. One short sentence in this article is hardly promoting. I'm mystified by User:The Banner hostile comments. Spleodrach (talk) 18:49, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: See his other edits... The Banner talk 20:22, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see an issue but if you do then bring it to WT:IE. Spleodrach (talk) 20:39, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I ask first... he might not be known with WP:COI. The Banner talk 21:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: What CoI is that? Spleodrach (talk) 21:22, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  decorative sacristy doors
Talk:Bush (mechanical)

message: I've always heard it called a "bushing". I notice that bushing redirects to this page. Does anyone call one of these a "bush"? —Ben FrantzDale 13:12, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I do, and so does most of the English speaking automotive industry. It's not a big deal, they are interchangeable. Greglocock 02:42, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bush v. bushing

message: A bush , or bushing, can be a rubber bush that allows no sliding at any interface. A plain bearing is designed to slip at one or other interface.
Greglocock 10:56, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DISAGREE WITH MERGE

message: The term "Bearing" can be properly applied to either a plain bearing or a rolling-element bearing (ball or roller bearing).   To those who work with plain bearings, normally the term "bearing" is used to refer to a "half-shell bearing" or a split bearing such as used on crankshafts for big-end connecting rod bearings or main bearings.  The term "bushing" is usually used to refer to a full-round bearing such as used for camshafts, automatic transmission shafts, and small end of connecting rods.   In the U.K. the term "bush" is normally used; in North America, "bushing" is more common.
While a bushing is indeed a plain bearing, the term "plain bearing" should be an entry under "bearing," and not a separate entry, as the term "bushing" is much more commonly used than "plain bearing.  Furthermore, the term "bushing" includes both plain bearings and other non-bearing devices (such as the rubber truck stabilizer on a skateboard), so it doesn't make sense to include bushing under plain bearing.  Thus, incorporate any material in "plain bearing" into "bushing," delete "plain bearing," and include an section under "bearing " entitled "plain bearing," with "more commonly known as a "bushing" included to differentiate.  Link to "bushing."  Mugaliens 16:15, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plain Bearing Nomenclature
Talk:Holy Angel University

message: Substantially all of the content on this page is copied from the university's web site.  For example, the history is copied from an old version of —see ; the descriptions of buildings are copied from separate pages on the web site like ; etc.  There is nothing substantial that can be saved here; ergo I'm marking it for speedy deletion. Kerfuffler (talk) 05:30, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess I don't see the value, but as long as the blatantly plagiarized text is removed, my “job” is done. Kerfuffler (talk) 06:55, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have declined the CSD tag on this article, but I've also removed everything I could find that was a copyright violation - which is pretty much all of it. The infobox and descriptor are all that remain. In theory I could have left in the long list of courses offered - that's not really a copyvio as such, since there's no other way to phrase "Batchelor of Science" - but I chose instead to stubbify the page so that it can be rebuilt from the ground up. Yunshui 雲‍水 07:42, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Would that also mean having an admin purge pretty much every revision after July 2007? Blake Gripling (talk) 07:49, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: blatant copyright infringement
Talk:Iligan Medical Center College

message: I've removed the Board of Directors section, as it didn't seem necessary, since it probably changes fairly often and the school's home page, which I've linked, is a much better source for this information. Just for quick reference, I'll paste in here the info I removed (it's in the history as well, of course).  Pinball22 14:12, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Board of Directors section
Talk:Visayas State University

message: To Whom It May Concern:
I would like to suggest to change the name or title of the article "Leyte State University" to "Visayas State University" due to it's recent conversion as supported by RA 9437 or other known as The Act which converted Leyte State University to Visayas State University.Vhic 57 08:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Big Steal (1990 film)

message: Of all the film articles in WP I have read, this one has the single worst, most farcically inappropriate, inferior plot summary.
Ever.
By a country mile. Arbo talk 12:05, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you improve it for the sake of future readers? :) Erik (talk | contribs) 15:25, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I could, but I won't. This kind of blather is the responsibility of the arseclown who wrote it in the first place. You think I should improve it? In the same breath you could do that yourself. I refuse to because there is a wider dimension to the group effort of authoring WP. I am a specialist Wikipedian, a critic. Now I have done my part by drawing attention to a problem, you and / or others could follow it up. After all, this is supposed to be a group effort. --- Arbo talk 12:25, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worst plot summary ever 

message: Why was this film changed from its original name, “Mark Clark Van Ark?” Sunwest42 (talk) 12:01, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The working title is mentioned in the Production section. Films often start out with a different title and then changed. The film wasn't released under the working title. Hope this helps, Knitsey (talk) 12:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Knitsey.  I am wondering where the working title came from. I know the actual (has to be the same person!), Mark Clark Van Ark. We worked together at the Boulder County Sheriff’s Department in Colorado years ago. (He’s actress Joan Van Ark’s brother.) My curiosity has gotten the best of me. How earth did Mark become the working title of an Australian movie?! Sunwest42 (talk) 21:18, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  QUESTION
Talk:List of non-Gaelic games played in Croke Park

message: Why is the 2009/2010 Magners League Final listed as a future event to be played at Croke Park? The venue is still TBA and depends on the participants.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Myfearlessfriend (talk • contribs) 01:20, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Final was played at RDS. (Mobile mundo (talk) 14:47, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  2009/2010 Magners League Final 

message: Is rule 42 notable enough for an article of it's own i current have it listed at Rule 42 ?Gnevin (talk) 18:30, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rule 42

message: Given that it's not stricly speaking a Gaelic game, shouldn't this list include the International Rules football games that have thus far been played? Van Dieman (talk) 02:06, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This was the first thing I thought of also Screech1616 (talk) 14:18, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  International Rules. 
Talk:Tipping the Velvet (TV series)

message: The word 'lesbian' does not feature anywhere in this article, so you have to read the whole of it before you guess what it's about. It would be more encyclopedic to introduce this defining issue somewhere in the first couple of sentences. Valetude (talk) 13:20, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sapphic dimension
Talk:Armor (Marvel Comics character)

message: This is not the Armor comic linked to from Continuity Comics. There was a comic titled Armor, drawn by Neal Adams in the 1980's.
:Please sign your posts.--RossF18 17:37, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Continuity Comics

message: There shouldn't be trivia sections, so I removed it and encorporated the info into the article. The only data I left out is:
*Hisako is 5'4", weighs 112 pounds, has black hair and black eyes.
These facts really should be left to marvel wiki and fan sites. --RossF18 17:37, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia