lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Joseph F. Girzone

message: I added a small amount to this article and fixed some of the publication dates. A lot can still be done. There still is no summary of Joshua or quotes from the author. I also need to go back in and rearrange the titles by date.
*Wow, my mistake in using Amazon for the publication dates; I suppose they were giving the dates of the editions they had in print, not the original publication dates. I'll be sure not to do that again. -JerryOrr 02:38, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Weißensee cemetery

message: Will add some picturesYellowmellow45 19:46, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding photos

message: How could the cost of renovating the cemetery be as high as 40 million euros? Surely the graves are largely intact, all that is needed is some gardening. The cemetery didn't look in poor condition when I saw it in 2012. Is there any comparative data for the cost of restoring a cemetery?Royalcourtier (talk) 05:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renovation 

message: I added a reference which explains the "second largest" claim.  That was reverted.  Isn't it valuable to readers to be able to quickly find the largest Jewish cemetery in Europe?MikeVdP (talk) 21:14, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second largest
Talk:Bob Mortimer

message: Clean up tags should really have some specific justification on here, although this article has obvious limitations and needs improving. I heard that Bob, when confronted by Jackson's entourage of high-powered American lawyers at the police station, panicked and ran away, leaving Jarvis on his own. Would be a cool R + M story to include.
:I think that bit might have been press invention :) According to Bob, he confronted the bodyguards saying they were falsely imprisoning Jarvis and he was released, with a bit of fuss though... Jimshears 17:24, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't think this section is worthy of inclusion. I see it is sourced but I don't think it warrants mentioning on Bob Mortimer's page, especially not in such detail as to make cruel remarks towards Mr Dawson. It seems to me like it was written by a fan of Mr Jones's and comes across as maliciously motivated. I don't often see subsections devoted to famous people trending on Twitter if the event itself wasn't newsworthy so it also feels out of place.
Would love some opinions on this as I am not a regular Wikipedia editor and am not certain I'm in the right to be critical of this.
Thank you
46.243.144.31 (talk) 22:46, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: . I removed that section because it failed to cite even one WP:RS for its account of a purported event that "took Twitter by storm"—citing instead only a series of tweets, and thus violating WP:NOR. KalHolmann (talk) 20:01, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  I do a podcast with Bob Mortimer
Talk:Combined diesel or gas

message: I might be wrong, but the first vessels to use CODOG was the Finnish Turunmaa class gunboats. Will have to check my sources. Scoo 20:00, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Turunmaa class boats had diesels and gas turbines on separate shafts. - Alureiter 20:07, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

text: OK, done. I added my source to the external links section. - Alureiter 21:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turunmaa class
Talk:Digenea

message: I've reworked the life-cycle part, and intend to do the same with other parts of this page. For instance, am planning some expansion with examples of non-human digenes Arga Warga 20:00, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Anyone know how the infections are diagnosed? i.e. What tests do doctors give you?70.79.55.114 (talk) 06:08, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Diagnosis of infection
Talk:Mechanical equilibrium

message: Should 'Unstable Stability' be directed here, when it plays such an important role in thermodynamics as well? One can watch water slowly boil and see the system at points change from unstable to stable as bubbles nucleate and grow. Geologist (talk) 13:36, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thermodynamics 

message: Is the link to Water in the "See Also" Section relevant?
- Imaginary Pi Slicer (talk) 04:31, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also section 

message: we have to add a heading named type of mechanical equilibrium, which are stable equilibrium, unstable equilibrium, and neutral equilibrium. AryanpateI (talk) 12:54, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requirement to add types of equilibrium.
Talk:Erik Christensen

message: The file :File:Erik Christensen Rangers.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Erik Christensen Rangers.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 01:07, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Erik Christensen Rangers.jpg]] 
Talk:Open source olap

message: It doesn't make sense to me that prepending "open source" on "OLAP" justfies a whole new wiki entry.  It would make sense to me to discuss open source OLAP on the OLAP page.
* agreed
* I agree that this should be part of the OLAP page, currently this is simply marketing material for Open Source projects and not a complete description of Open Source technologies related to OLAP.  I also wonder what value there to listing in great detail some projects but not all?
* I suggest just a link to this is more than enough
* agreed. These are applications of OLAP technologies like any other, and should be displayed on the same page as proprietary OLAP solutions. - hendrixski
* OK - sounds like there is a consensus. I will redirect this page to OLAP page unless there is a last minute objection. Wikiolap 07:01, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I redirected this page to OLAP now, and added information about Open Source OLAP there. Wikiolap 17:56, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge open source OLAP into [[OLAP]] article
Talk:Tim Hartman

message: Added some backing information for requested info.  The announcements concerning the 6th and Datu title are no longer online at their original location, due to that website changing hands and older news articles being edited out at the new location. (Was originally announced at modernarnis.com when it was the IMAF site. Since moving to ProfessorPresas.com and the resultant split in the IMAF, articles prior to that are long since gone.  Information is still available through Archive.org however, and has been cited repeatedly in discussions on several Modern Arnis forums. --Bob Hubbard 08:09, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sources are clearly listed on the page under the section ironically labeled, "Sources" and "Magazine Articles". Bob Hubbard (talk) 02:36, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added in-line references. There are many magazines listed: the article would be stronger if it used these third party sources as in-line citations rather than a Tim Hartman's personal site as a source. jmcw (talk) 11:49, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Corrado Balducci

message: * I disagree with the Speedy nomination. He seems notable enough: http://www.pufoin.com/pufoin_perspective/et_church.php Flyboy Will 20:34, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The translation is from an external site.  I've tried to paraphrase it. I've paraphrased what this Roman Catholic theologian wrote.  It in no way reflects my beliefs.  For me statements that angels are a “theological certainty” are unproved improbable and contrary to Occam’s Razor. Proxima Centauri 2 (talk) 08:08, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Monsignor Corrado Balducci wasn't an exorcist, but what it is called in italian a "demonologo".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.223.64.131 (talk) 12:56, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That concurs with an assertion from Leo Zagami that Balducci is in fact a demonologist. However, we still need a reliable source corroborating this. __meco (talk) 11:55, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  not an exorcist! 

message: Does anyone know whether the Monsignor believed that Jesus died to save the souls of the extra-terrestrials, too?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.174.150.38 (talk) 03:46, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  theological views
Talk:Dorotheus

message: *Since no one objected, I moved the material originally listed here under "Dorotheus" to "Dorotheus (jurist)" and put a disambiguation page here to triage users between this jurist Dorotheus and the astrologer Dorotheus of Sidon, who has has own article now.  --NaySay N. Harris
:*I added Dorotheus of Tyre, a bishop of Tyre, who may also be referred to as Dorotheus of Antioch. Stevenmitchell 13:49, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Thank you so much!  I just moved the "disambiguation" notice to the end of the page. Welcome! NaySay 14:08, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Expanded.--Zoupan 08:17, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions
Talk:Bristol Filton Airport

message: I'm surprised by this article title (Filton Aerodrome). I worked there from 1957 to 1993 and live only 10 miles away. It might have been called Filton Aerodrome many years ago but for a long time now it has been called Filton Airfield. I think the title should be changed if there's a concensus - Adrian Pingstone 20:37, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The runway headings were wrong as well. Both the AIP and the WAD had same info on length and headings. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming

message: According to the Filton Airfield website, the current correct name of the place is Bristol Filton Airport, so I intend to move this article from Filton Aerodrome to Bristol Filton Airport. Are there any objections to this? Gasheadsteve 08:06, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, since no objections were raised. Gasheadsteve 10:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of article

message: According to the RAF Filton entry, 504 (County of Nottingham) Squadron (Auxiliary Air Force) was moved in from 26 September 1940, flying Hawker Hurricane Mk1 fighters, as a result of this raid - not Spifires as stated in this article. Anyone know for sure which statement is correct? Andywebby (talk) 21:41, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spitfires at Filton following the 'Filton Blitz' 

message: I have to admit this is weird. It's the figure of a man standing to the south of the main runway near some demolished WWII buildings. It was even reported!86.143.55.59 (talk) 18:11, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of the ghost seen on GoogleEarth? 

message: Why was this airport decided to be closed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clrichey (talk • contribs) 03:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closure reasons?
Talk:OFI Sunday

message: Was this axed?
: Yup, it was ideed. A sixth show according to IMDB was aired under the name "OFI Friday" as it was shown on the 30th of December 2005. It was axed by ITV due to low ratings, even though Chris said it would be back in 2006.Marcus Bowen (talk) 16:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Axed 

message: :*Hiten - Chris' real life assistant for the show for the first two shows, but from the third episode would spin the caller/audience wheel for Mine or Not Mine in a wig.
This needs to be rewritten. I couldn't decipher it. ◦◦derekbd◦◦my talk◦◦ 04:55, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTF?
Talk:List of Sri Lankan musicians

message: Shouldn't all these be bracketed, so that the reader/editor can tell which ones have entries and which do not?  And do you want to put up requests for them to be written?  Are they all encyclopedia-worthy?  Do any of them have links to the future Sinhala or current Tamil  versions of Wikipedia, and should they?  Just some questions for those working on this page.  Bruxism 20:50, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: To be added under S: Shehara, Under T: Tennyson Napoleon Sh3hara Sri Lankan Music (talk) 16:38, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 16:54, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 May 2023 

message: 193.152.124.30 (talk) 22:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. User:CanonNi (talk|contribs) 01:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 April 2024
Talk:Pope Paul III

message: Am I the only one that thinks this page needs to be cleaned up a bit? Like separating the various parts of life and all...--Elsan 20:55, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is obviously cut and paste from an early 20-th century source. If anyone wants to take it up, a very good article could be created from more modern sources. PiCo 02:57, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Rather than replacing 20th-century sources influenced by 20th-century interests by 21st-century sources influenced by 21st century interests, why not quote somewhere the whole (translated) contents of the original bill, like some European wikipedias (for instance :fr:Veritas ipsa) already do ? No more copyright applies to these documents now. 82.226.27.88 (talk) 15:28, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write needed 

message: "The right of inhabitants of Rome to publicly buy and sell slaves of both sexes was affirmed"
One can wonder if this quoted opinion is founded, because all acts were in latin and the very same word servus means in latin servant as well as slave, so it seems unclear. Of course, the transfer of a good servant would be negociated, just as the transfer of a good football player nowadays : any good contract, even nowadays, has its escape clauses.  82.226.27.88 (talk) 15:22, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin original citation needed 
Talk:1997 in aviation

message: 2 things. First, Finch wasn't first to do it; it was done also in the 30h anniversary year, 1967 (I don't recall who by) in an exact copy of Earhart's L10E. (Finch's wasn't.) 2d, anybody think tail number of Finch's 10E (NX72GT) is worth including?  Trekphiler 20:58, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Circumnavigation
Wikipedia talk:Eras/Archive 2

message: Why in the world is this all of a sudden Jguk talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)/Eras?
In the editorial comment moving everyone else's discussion to Archive1, Jguk said "archiving on a point of agreement - in hope that this can be the start of reconciliation"
I have no idea what agreement he is talking about.  
The most significant portion thrown in out in the archives was the discussion of the wording, which is proposed on the project page to which this talk page is attached.  Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)/Eras - Archive1#Wording discussion.  Gene Nygaard 02:53, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was discussion deleted 

message: The above wordings (as of timestamp) seem to be very good and exactly the sort of thing I was hoping to achieve. violet/riga (t) 23:02, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense now.  So, are we voting, or what? siafu 00:03, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording discussion

message: Another thing that should be favored in some way is long-standing usage.  Exactly what that means in various circumstances (age of article would be a major factor) would need to be spelled out better.  Gene Nygaard 13:06, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Long-standing usage 

message: Any favoring on any basis should not be a determinative factor.  Mostly, what the favoring should do is to place the burden of establishing a relatively clear basis for change on those proposing the change.  Gene Nygaard 13:06, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: What does "favoring" mean? 

message: The proposed variations are not always mutually exclusive.  Sometimes more than one of them could apply, or sometimes the one which should apply could depend on the state of development of the article in question or other factors.  Gene Nygaard 13:51, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Different approaches in different circumstances

message: the heading of the "Favour the original author" section of alternatives is in direct conflict with the proposed wording, "Changes to an article's era naming style should not be made except to restore the style used originally."  If you don't understand the difference, see Talk:Diamond.   Gene Nygaard 13:51, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Original author
Talk:International Appalachian Trail

message: I have put a reference to Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island into the article because trails are show on the IAT/SIA map here, although I'm not absolutely certain they're part of the IAT or just honorary side hikes, or something like that. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 21:18, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nova Scotia and PEI 

message: I rewrote a paragraph -- I may be a layman, but I'm still certain that the connected history of the mountain ranges on the three continents is settled science, not "theorizing" by trail enthusiasts. My rewrite's a little wordy in the context of an article about a hiking trail. It might benefit from a little pruning. Have at it... Phaseolus (talk) 06:21, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geology 

message: Mention is made of proposals to extend the trail in Europe and further down it staes that 'chapters' have been set up'. Does this need updating now? The West Highland Way page (Scotland) says that it is now a part of the IAT as does this - http://www.west-highland-way.co.uk/links.asp - on the official website. cheers Geopersona (talk) 06:53, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact the map needs updating to reflect the sections now established east of the Atlantic! cheers Geopersona (talk) 06:56, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  IAT in UK and Europe
Talk:The Problem with Popplers

message: I reverted back to just Plot, as the other episodes all go by the former. Should we change everything to the latter?
--Dvandersluis 19:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot vs [[Plot]] [[Synopsis]] 

message: Before the opening secuence there is something like a ad for this episode. I dont know what it say in english but in spanish is lomething like "Boron liquido" (Liquid boron) Can anyone confirm this with the DVD?--ometzit<col> 01:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably Molten Boron Stardust8212 01:38, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening promo

message: In the trivia section, it says "The "popplers" are based on McDonalds McNuggets." - Aren't they based on KFC's popcorn chicken? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by CharlieWaters (talk • contribs) 10:29, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poppler Inspiration? 

message: What's with the Notability warning? All other Futurama episodes have their own article. Why makes this one so non-special? Lots42 04:04, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone came through and tagged every episode with that tag. Since then various people for various reasons have removed tags from specific episodes. If you feel that the article meets the criteria at WP:EPISODE then the tag can be removed. If it doesn't then please help improve the article so it does! Stardust8212 12:43, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability? 

message: The Soylent Green joke is recurring? I only remember it in one post-intro ad. Lots42 (talk) 14:16, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soylent  

message: The link from Free Waterfall Jr to the List of Futurama Characters is broken.  It doesn't go to the Waterfall Family, because that has been completely removed!  There was a section there describing Jr, Old Man Waterfall and others all in one section.  Now it is all gone and I can't find it in History.  - Bill 04:51, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Waterfall Family 

message: Please observe that the opening section identifies this as episode 18 of season 2, the infobox identifies it as episode 28 of season 2, and the list of episodes identifies it as episode 15 of season 2.  BobbyPeru (talk) 18:07, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed the lead which was incorrect, the episode list is correct, Episode 28 refers to it being the 28th episode overall but I agree the current infobox layout does make this somewhat confusing, not sure how to make it more clear. Stardust8212 18:42, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode number what?
Wikipedia talk:Eras/Archive 3

message: I propose that this policy should be named as Wikipedia:Eras – I'll move it there shortly unless someone can come up with an objection or better alternative. violet/riga (t) 09:30, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming this page

message: By and large the general populance aren't going to have a clue what CE/BCE stands for (or why it's being used). I suggest the policy state that if CE/BCE are being used, they should be linked to in the first occurance. Certainly the usage is clear from the context, but the first two points are issues that non-academics and non-secularists aren't going to be aware of.
Perhaps BCE/CE is more common in the US, I don't know. But the US is a minority, and does not represent the whole world of English users.
zoney ♣ talk 09:56, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: A very good point.  I've questioned numerous people about its use, including kids in history lessons, and they aren't really sure of what BCE/CE refers to.  I agree that it should be policy to link the first occurance.  violet/riga (t) 10:35, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This argument isn't worth much by itself. It's not like it's a complex concept. An encyclopedia cannot make its editorial decision based on the supposed ignorance of the readership. All years are linked and any reasonable reader will easily understand what they mean. Zocky 13:48, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explaining BCE/CE 

message: How about we sidestep the whole mess, and use Julian dates for everything?  Time in the JD system is measured in days since a fairly arbitrary point far enough in the past to cover recorded human history.
As an alternative, if people want to use years, we could use the AUC system.  It too is based on a fairly arbitrary starting point, but requires the use of negative numbers for years far enough in the past.
What do you think? --Carnildo 18:50, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  A modest proposal
Talk:Ismene

message: This pic might be good for the page:
http://www.css.edu/depts/theatre/Theatre/TheatrePhotos/Ismene.jpg
- it says its 19th century, so it should be public domain.  I haven't found any info on the artist "Emil Teschendorff" though.   
- Ravenous 21:06, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The article says that Oedipus gave the kingdom of Thebes to his sons and he later curses them. However, when Oedipus goes into exile for his crimes, Eteocles and Polynices are both boys and Creon holds the throne. It isn't until later that they share the throne. (And I think they share the throne multiple times before the conflict begins) Please tell me if there are any other variations of this story. --Must WIN 00:53, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etiocles/Polynices Conflict
Talk:Jack Comer

message: *For those interested, a WikiProject regarding crime in Great Britain has been proposed. MadMax 19:16, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject British Crime|WikiProject British Crime]]

message: This is given as 1995 and 1996.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.4.21 (talk) 10:09, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death 

message: At least in the photo given the scar is hard to miss. Any history of how he got it? Cheers! Xenomorph erotica (talk) 17:45, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scar?