Talk:Strong Republic Transit System

message: Is there a reason as to why Metro Manila (or maybe indeed the rest of the country) prefers elevated and sometimes street-level railways to subway systems?
That's because flooding is a serious problem in Metro Manila though its not as bad as it used to be. Plus elevated systems are cheaper to construct. Themanilaxperience (talk) 05:48, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Preference for elevated and street-level railways

message: I've been reverting some recent edits adding intermediate terminals (that is, terminal stations which are not the ends of a line) because they're a very thorny issue.  For starters, if we are to discuss the number of intermediate terminals alone, I don't think we'd want to choose.
*LRT-1: 5 (EDSA, Central Terminal, Doroteo Jose, Blumentritt, Monumento)
*MRT-2: 2 (Pureza, Araneta Center-Cubao)
*MRT-3: 5 (Magallanes, Ayala, Guadalupe, Shaw Boulevard, Araneta Center-Cubao)
*PNR: 7 (Sucat, EDSA, Pasay Road, Paco, Santa Mesa, España, Blumentritt)
I don't think it's prudent to name intermediate terminal stations unless there is definitive proof that these stations are indeed the sole intermediate terminal for their respective lines (the only proof of this is in LRT-1, which has Central Terminal LRT Station).  Let's try gathering consensus on this issue. --Sky Harbor (talk) 19:41, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intermediate terminals 

message: SRTS is currently not mentioned in PNR's history section (http://www.pnr.gov.ph/history.htm) not on http://www.dotc.gov.ph/, nor does NEDA (http://www.neda.gov.ph/) or Presidente (http://president.gov.ph/) mention the discontinued program. The various LRT and MRT sites do not show any sign that SRTS is still running. If the program is not to be found on these sites, how in the world could SRTS not be discontinued? UtnogUtnog (talk) 18:58, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  SRTS 

message: First, I would like to say, I thought it was LRT-2? Nevertheless, I use LRT-2 instead of MRT-2. I saw once in the transit itself as LRT-2. I know this is like an opinion, but
It is either:
* LRT-1
* LRT-2
* MRT-3
* (Orange Line/Southrail) PNR-4
* (Green Line/Northrail) PNR-5(or some chance,since it will be remade,PNR-9)
* LRT-1 Extension as 6 (or 5 if Northrail PNR will be 9)
* MRT-7
* LRT-2 Extension as 8
or
* LRT-1
* LRT-2
* MRT-3
* LRT-1 Extension as 4
* Orange Line/Southrail) PNR-5
* (Green Line/Northrail) PNR-6
* MRT-7
* LRT-2 Extension as 8
If the "sub-lines" are counted and this is a most signified opinion , it is either
* LRT-1
* LRT-2
* MRT-3
* LRT-1 Extension as 4
:* Phase 1 = 4a
:* Phase 2 = 4b
* West/East LRT-2 Extension as 5
* East/West LRT-2 Extension as 6
* MRT-7
* (Orange Line/Southrail) PNR-8
* (Green Line/Northrail) Phase 1 PNR-9
* (Green Line/Northrail) Phase 2 PNR-10 
EDIT:
I just saw that the LRT extension is 6.
* LRT-1
* LRT-2
* MRT-3
* West/East LRT-2 Extension as 4
* East/West LRT-2 Extension as 5
* LRT-1 Extension as 6
:* Phase 1 = 6a
:* Phase 2 = 6b
* MRT-7
* (Orange Line/Southrail) PNR-8
* (Green Line/Northrail) Phase 1 PNR-9
* (Green Line/Northrail) Phase 2 PNR-10 
or
* LRT-1
* LRT-2
* MRT-3
* (Orange Line/Southrail) PNR-4
* (Green Line/Northrail) Phase 1 PNR-5a
* (Green Line/Northrail) Phase 2 PNR-5a 
* LRT-1 Extension as 6
:* Phase 1 = 6a
:* Phase 2 = 6b
* MRT-7
* West/East (L/)MRT-2 Extension as 8
* East/West (L/)MRT-2 Extension as 9
or
* LRT-1
* LRT-2
* MRT-3
* (Orange Line/Southrail) PNR-4
* (Green Line/Northrail) Phase 1 PNR-5
* LRT-1 Extension as 6
:* Phase 1 = 6a
:* Phase 2 = 6b
* MRT-7
* West/East (L/)MRT-2 Extension as 8
* East/West (L/)MRT-2 Extension as 9
* (Green Line/Northrail) Phase 2 PNR-10
or again 
* LRT-1
* LRT-2
* MRT-3
* (Orange Line/Southrail) PNR-4
* (Green Line/Northrail) Phase 1 PNR-5
* LRT-1 Extension Phase 1 as 6a
* MRT-7
* West/East (L/)MRT-2 Extension as 8
* East/West (L/)MRT-2 Extension as 9
* (Green Line/Northrail) Phase 2 PNR-10 (or 11)
* LRT-1 Phase 2 as 11 (or 10) Taposa1 (talk) 14:47, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number Lines 

message: This was a project of one president a couple of presidents ago that wasn't continued.  There are similar efforts under different names.  Is this WP:Notable enough to justify a separate article?  I propose merging it into Public transport in Metro Manila or some similar article as part of a larger discussion of the history of transport in Metro Manila. --Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 04:16, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into other articles