lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lisa See

message: There are no controversial details in the biography.  Everything is factual.   Lfrancissells Lfrancissells (talk) 18:13, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Okay, so I know she writes ALL of her books about being Chinese, but she's what? 1/4 Chinese at most? Does anyone know anything about her ethnic lineage? I really think it's unfair, and basically kind of ridiculous, to include Lisa See in the category of "Asian-Americans" without some more information - no matter how much her "Asian-American ethnicity" influences her. Has anyone read her book "On Gold Mountain" and can share more about her ethnicity? 
I mean I'm 1/16 Mongolian and I find it really interesting, does that mean I get to be called an authority on Genghis Khan? And I'm 1/4 Japanese, but I didn't tick the Asian-American box on my college scholarship applications. Just a thought. xprivate eyex (talk) 00:30, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Asian-American?

message: Hi Wikipedians, At first I was confused that she was American but born in France. I have added details of her American parents as students in Paris. That explains that See was born in France but is an American. Thanks, SWP13 (talk) 14:25, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Born in Paris 

message: Organizing an author tea with Michelle gable, same day you’re in HB, to benefit pediatric cancer research. You also spoke at our philharmonic society literary luncheon. Could u donate an autographed book for our silent auction? Judy Aoki, 10937 el coco circle, fv, ca 92708. I will see u in HB after my tea. Can’t wait to read your new book-read all books including mysteries-have most of your books. Also have a little library. 45.48.139.190 (talk) 14:18, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Donation
Talk:Katsuhito Ishii

message: Party 7 (2000) starring Tadanobu Asano
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_7 ---> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watney_Combe_%26_Reid#Watneys_Red_Barrel
Is there a way to change how pages forward?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Comomomo (talk • contribs) 07:40, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Party 7 currently forwards to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watney_Combe_%26_Reid#Watneys_Red_Barrel
Talk:Kazutaka Miyatake

message: Mid-Eighties?
The Japanese edition of Starship Troopers Miyatake worked on (in collaboration with fellow Studio Nue artist Nobuyuki Kato) was published in 1975, not the mid-eighties.  Can someone better at editing (I'm not experienced) fix this and its citation?   Much detail on this subject (with further references) can be found here:  http://ourstarblazers.com/vault/527/   The design is considered historically significant to Japanese fans as being often cited as what helped inspire the "real robot" (aka "SF mecha") anime boom such as Gundam.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.47.80.223 (talk) 07:49, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Evelyn Lin

message: I hope the closing admin will notice that save for the first two votes, most of the votes here are from users with few or no edits outside of this topic and do not make any attempt to argue within Wikipedia policy. —Ocatecir Talk 06:31, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also suspect that some of these accounts (or even most?) could be the work of one user. Many of the accounts have their first edit here and the deletes seem to be straw man sock puppets. Just some things to consider (these sock puppets and SPAs make deciphering AFDs really difficult.) —Ocatecir Talk 07:31, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: SPAs
Talk:Lance W. Lord

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:35, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Loolwa Khazzoom

message: <ref>https://jwa.org/people/khazzoom-loolwa
<ref>https://www.interfaithfamily.com/arts_and_entertainment/popular_culture/stories_we_havent_yet_heard_a_review_of_the_flying_camel/
<ref>https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/uncomfortable-conversations-with-lisa-schmidt/e/49866839
<ref>http://www.streetharassmentproject.org/review_consequence.html
Actuallyrmk (talk) 03:51, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Ken Harris

message: Was he the tall guy in ‘Wakaki Wabbit’? Teddy pierce did the voice, I know. 2A00:23C3:E284:900:D1C4:4D40:C4C3:DC91 (talk) 16:12, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: personal appearance in cartoon
Talk:Rodents as pets

message: This page aint just a stub, it is extremely USA-centricUndead Herle King (talk) 03:19, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias

message: The name "pocket pet" may give the impression that the person looking for the "small pet" article has found something closer to a Tamagochi toy "pet". Thoughts? Maxaxle (talk) 23:26, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: When your post popped up on my watchlist, my first thought was "What is this, some Pokemon knockoff?". I've never heard this term used outside Wikipedia, and I would definitely support a move to some other title, if you have a suggestion. — Gavia immer (talk) 00:07, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is used. However, at least one source listed there includes cats and small dogs, whereas our article seems to exclude those. I'm not convinced we need an article on this, probably poorly defined, term. Ucucha 00:17, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

text: Yeah, the last three animals talked about are not rodents. Does anybody have any suggestions as to a new name? I don't think "pocket pet" works very well either (see above). AviationFreak💬 15:07, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: The name

message: Why are rabbits not listed on this article as pocket pets? Rabbit233 (talk) 16:03, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rabbits
Talk:Louis P. Lochner

message: If a relative of Louis Lochner happens to find this page, please do not hesitate to write if you have photographs or additional information which may be placed into the public record. Thanks! —Tim Davenport, Early American Marxism website, Corvallis, OR — MutantPop@aol.com — Carrite (talk) 18:51, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Note to relatives
Talk:705th Strategic Missile Wing

message: RAF Squadrons - unlike their USAF equivalents, and some British Army units, are almost never referred to ordinally, hence my change to "77 Squadron" rather than "77th Squadron" etc.
Also, 20 RAF squadrons were each equipped with three THOR missiles, and each based at a different RAF station within the UK, rather than the four referred to in the article. I believe the original intention was for there to be four squadrons, each with four "flights" of three missiles, although I don't know yet when the decision to change the structure was made. I'll try to find out a bit more. Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 11:48, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  RAF Squadron numbers
Talk:Lourdes Castrillo Brillantes

message: Dragonbite 03:36, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo request

message: The article states that she "is" a writer. Given the dates in the Achievements section I would assume that she is dead, or at least no longer a writer. I know nothing on the subject of the article, so I won't change this myself. Dates regarding her life would also be helpful. Mnealon (talk) 20:43, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  is/was 
Talk:Lowell Cunningham

message: Missing from his list of comic book credits is the one-shot Jack Ooze, drawn by Ralph Miranda and published in 2012 by About Comics. I won't be adding it myself, as I have a strong conflict of interest (I'm the publisher of About Comics), but anyone interested in updating the list can use this article as a reference. --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:44, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, Nat. Article's on my watchlist, so ... done! --Tenebrae (talk) 15:25, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing credit
Talk:341st Space Wing

message: The three units to be renamed as missile wings are the 90th Space Wing, F.E. Warren AFB, Wyo; the 91st Space Wing, Minot AFB, ND; and the 341st Space Wing, Malmstrom AFB, Mont. These units operate the Air Force's Minuteman III ICBM fleet.  Will await official news story for when the name change will actually happen before moving article. --Pmsyyz (talk) 18:31, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename soon
Talk:Spin-stabilized magnetic levitation

message: Your explanation of the Levitron only deals with the mechansim which prevents the levitating magnet from turning over or slipping sideways.
It does not address the issue of the existence of a stability node in the vertical plane.
If we are going to discuss Earnshaw's Theorem, then this question needs to be addressed whether in the case of the Levitron, or in the case of levitating ring magnets placed over a pole, or in the case of levitating bar magnets in a test tube, or in the case of trains that are magnetically levitating above the railway track.
In fact you are quite wrong when you state in the main article that Earnshaw's Theorem doesn't apply just because the magnet is spinning. You have completely misunderstood what Earnshaw's Theorem means. 
Although Earnshaw's Theorem comes directly from Gauss's Law and refers to equilibrium nodes between static objects, the term static in this context means the absence of linear motion. Gauss's Law tells us that there can be no equilibrium nodes between static objects if the only forces involved obey the inverse square law.
It is a totally specious argument to claim that Gauss's Law ceases to apply simply because the Levitron is spinning and is therefore not technically static. The Levitron is static for the purposes of Gauss's law and to say otherwise is merely a specious play on words. The spin of the Levitron cannot possibly introduce an up/down stability node as between the magnetic force and the gravitational force. That stability node is there anyway, as can be demonstrated by levitating static ring magnets over a pole. And it is the existence of that stability node which is the subject of controversy. The Levitron's spin has got absolutely nothing to do with the controversy over Earnshaw's Theorem. (61.7.159.2 07:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Earnshaw's Theorem
Talk:Bead Geyser

message: I took pictures of Bead Geyser in the 1990s that I'm happy to donate to the entry.
https://twitter.com/kurtschwehr/status/1651988748572442624
https://vislab-ccom.unh.edu/~schwehr/yellowstone/enter.html Goatbar (talk) 16:47, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images from Bead Geyser
Talk:Beehive Geyser

message: I've never seen this contention in any other discussions of Beehive.  It certainly doesn't appear on the GOSA page.  Where does this come from?  Lacking any references, it would be my preference to remove the statement. -- Bill-on-the-Hill (talk) 21:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Longer intervals near the end of the series"?
Talk:Lucille Nixon

message: There was no response; will send the article to AfD. --B. Wolterding 18:41, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert review 
Talk:351st Missile Wing

message: The Flights for the 509th and 510th SMSs are incorrect.
The 509th consists of G,H,J,K,L and the 510th consists of F,I,M,N,O.http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/facility/images/whiteafb.gifhttp://asuwlink.uwyo.edu/~jimkirk/whiteman.html
The second reference lists the correct flights in a squadron, but has the 509th and 510th switched, as Oscar is identified as under the 510th SMS.http://www.whiteman.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123059736
Odie257 (talk) 03:30, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lucy Taylor

message: An article about a living person without a birthdate is either a hoax, or unimportant. Nirmos (talk) 04:56, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I easily found her birth year through the link to her IFSDB bio.  James65.pike (talk) 13:27, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kurt Neumann (director)

message: I just watched "The Kid From Texas (1950)" and Kurt Neuman was in the credits as the director. I do not care to learn how to edit this but wanted someone to look into doing that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.58.165.136 (talk) 00:34, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

message: As part of my research for Kurt Neumann for FürthWiki I stumbled over a "disagreement" . Here in Wiki and in the Film Database IMdB is Neumann given as Year of Birth 1908. This does not seem plausible to me, as this would mean that Neumann must have studied at a young age between 12 and 20 and already performed as a Director in the age from 22-23. This did not appear to me particularly plausible. By my Research i found this facts: 
* Find a Grave - Foto from the Grave from Kurt Neumann Hompepage and
* "Celebrities in Los Angeles Cemeteries: A Directory" Googlebooks
Both are based on a different date of birth, namely from the year 1898 - what the Reasons mentioned above - seems a little more plausible. Furthermore, I 'm assuming that the familymembers have hardly mistake when they wrote the year of birth on the grave stone, so that the year of birth 1908 can not seem to agree. It is also not clear where the yera of birth 1908 comes from, so I personally would be inclined to change the year of birth. --Kasa Fue (talk) 10:36, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of Birth 

message: The article asserts that Neumann died of natural causes, but offers no source for this.  Meanwhile, several other sources contend that it was suicide.  I have no idea what the truth is, but I hope someone can resolve this.Jhlechner (talk) 17:07, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Talk:Moshe Reuven Azman

message: as shows in this article <ref> he is the rabbi of the brodski synagogue, not Ukraine! Kyiv Jew (talk) 02:04, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: so what is his psition? Zach own (talk) 20:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: He is the cheif Rabbi. Rabbi Yaakov Blaich as respected as he is, is not considered to be the chief rabbi of Ukraine. This is a bit of a controversial topic because Rabbi Azman isn't recognized by Chabad, but that doesnt change the facts. 151.82.231.96 (talk) 11:58, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  rabbi asman is not the rabbi of Ukraine
Talk:Jackson Rhoads

message: Phil Campbell of Motorhead should be add to the list of other guitarists who use Randy Rhoads  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.242.129.216 (talk) 23:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a Washburn RR-V (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washburn_RR-V_Tour_Series).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1812:1D2B:5A00:480A:144E:D659:67FD (talk) 18:14, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motorhead 

message: Can anyone find article talking about the L/L? I have never heard of this before, and it sounds weird because neither of them use(d) Rosewood fretboards or bolt-on necks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.255.105.104 (talk) 23:07, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I realize that this comment is six years old, but I will answer it. To the best of my knowledge: Alex Laiho was a Jackson user. He was in the process of getting a signature model when his gear was stolen. Jackson takes a long time to make guitars and couldn't get spec'd gear to him quick enough. Esp helped him out and offered him a deal for more money. He accepted. The designs for the Laiho Rhoads became the RR24, specifically it became the "factory error RR24" - which I believe was 2006. Beginchile (talk) 12:52, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laiho/Latvala
Talk:Lav Diaz

message: *http://www.filmuforia.co.uk/season-devil-2018/
*https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/17/movies/time-traveling-at-the-toronto-film-festival.html
*https://www.bangkokpost.com/lifestyle/film/1416207/devil-on-the-doorstep
*https://mubi.com/notebook/posts/reversing-the-rules-a-brief-reflection-on-lav-diaz-and-his-latest-film
*https://www.artforum.com/film/travis-jeppesen-at-the-68th-berlin-international-film-festival-74437
*https://www.bangkokpost.com/print/1087149/
*http://www.filmstarts.de/kritiken/262014/kritik.html
*https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/18/movies/the-woman-who-left-review-lav-diaz.html
*https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/oct/14/the-woman-who-left-review-lav-diaz
*The official Lav Diaz website
* New Filipino Cinema, Yerba Buena Center for the Arts
* Corporal Histories: Lav Diaz's Epic Philippine Cinema (Exit Art of New York Retrospective)
*Video Interview Cargo Magazine
*The Films of Lav Diaz
*A Conversation with Lav Diaz by Alexis Tioseco Criticine.com
*Exploitation is never cool to me. A Conversation with Lav Diaz La furia umana, n. 9, Summer 2011 [lafuriaumana.it] 
* 11 Hours in a Life's Cause by Lim Li Min (New York Times)
*Militant elegy. A conversation with Lav Diaz La furia umana, n. 17, Autumn 2013 [lafuriaumana.it]
*The Burden of History. A conversation with Lav Diaz La furia umana, n. 21, Autumn 2014 [lafuriaumana.it]
*Philippines Year Zero. A conversation with Lav Diaz Summer 2016 [debordements.fr]
*Lying Down In A World Of Tempest - Lav Diaz Edited collection by Courtisane Film Festival [.pdf]
*Introduction to Lav Diaz's cinema MUBI Notebook 2016-2017 retrospective
*Lav Diaz: “Art is a commitment to the beauty of the soul” Sight & Sound interview (May 2017)
*No Forgiveness Without Justice. A conversation with Lav Diaz Summer 2017 [debordements.fr]
Moved from the EL section, put here for future use. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 08:07, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: External links
Talk:ISO/IEC 27001

message: I removed the link to a standards purchase site, standardsdirect.org. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam/2008 Archive Nov 1#StandardsDirect.org for more about this site. As I see it, Wikipedia is not a directory and we're not here to help people sell things. Most of these standardsdirect.org links have been added by single purpose accounts who likely have a conflict of interest. See:
*Conflict of Interest Guideline
*What Wikipedia is Not Policy
*External Links Guideline
*Spam Guideline
If an established, high-volume editor wants to add it back to the article, by all means go ahead. Otherwise, it stays out pending resolution at the spam discussion link above. --A. B. (talk •  contribs)  00:40, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Reacting to a campaign from one vendor to another is usually not the right path. This applies not just on a wiki, but generally.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by IntraSec (talk • contribs) 09:52, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, that site looks like a direct competitor site to... YOURS (iso27001security.com). That page, and I read it, provides decent content and explains the cert process, and there is clearly no link to SD, even if this was a witch-hunt. Please do NOT use Wikipedia as a competitor market or for indirect self gain.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.231.84 (talk) 09:16, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: StandardsDirect.org

message: See at 27 November, The two page are merged, but under the title of "ISO/IEC 27001:2013". Concerning the relationship, it should be more proper to be in name of "ISO 27001", be more generic. and the 2013 version is only one of the revision. And due to ISO revision cycle, there will be version 2018 soon.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.0.157.195 (talk) 03:49, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seems merged but wrong title 

message: Picking up the discussion from above: the two articles "ISO/IEC 27001:2005" and "ISO/IEC 27001:2013" are merely describing several revisions of the same standard and should be merged into "ISO/IEC 27001". Hekerui (talk) 19:51, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge discussion
Talk:Kids of the Future

message: This page is incredibly shorter than I last remembered (the article not the talk page).  Should cameos roles of disney channel stars be added?  For proof there's this youtube video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WyfGqNow4lI  It's the full length music video.  The clearest is Corbin Bleu at 2:47.  I also caught glimpses of Vanessa Hudgens at around 2:49 and Ashley Tisdale at 2:38.Michael Cook 16:51, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened? 

message: If you were to play KOTF backwards,you'll hear santic lyrics.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Npurplegirl (talk • contribs) 00:18, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm Serious 

message: I suggest that this be merged into the Kids in America article.  Very little information on the page is notable enough to merit a separate article for this song, which is in fact merely a cover with slightly different lyrics.  The fact that it was performed by a specific group or was a tie-in with a movie does not mean it deserves its own article.  In addition, there is little to no information in regard to it being released as a single.  Is there any chart information?  Is there a source in this unsourced article that backs up the claim that it was released as a single?  Anyway, as if you couldn't tell, I vote to merge. I am the 0dd1. (talk) 05:55, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless there is more information that can be added to this article, I agree. Rockin56 (talk) 00:54, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Kids in America]]

message: No.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeroRamone (talk • contribs) 01:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punk?
Talk:Lee Shapiro

message: Nicaragua Was Our Home is a very short article of fairly marginal notability, it is also Shapiro's main claim to fame. It would therefore seem to make sense to merge it here, per WP:MERGE#Rationales #3 (Text) & #4 (Context). HrafnTalkStalk(P) 17:52, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. No point in having two articles in which the same info is repeated. Steve Dufour (talk) 01:46, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Les Nouvelles Egotistes

message: The term "Nouvelles Egotistes" is grammatically wrong in french. This term would suggest that the movement is made-up of a majority of women. Which is not the case. The correct term in french should be les "Nouvels Egotistes".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.227.185.253 (talk) 12:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The term is grammatically wrong in french
Talk:Lev Kuleshov

message: Second paragraph, third line: 
I think the experiments to which this sentence refers are psychologically very important - not only to film -, but also difficult to explain. (I myself do not have an explanation; although I have a feeling for their importancy.) 
Therefore, I think (1) it is a MUST to point out the fact that EXACTLY THE SAME scene of (the face of) an actor was cut into different environments in which the actor actually seemed to be living. Otherwise, the sentence about the reaction of the spectators cannot be understood. 
But (2) the statement of this fact should be supported by some examples: If the environment of the actor was depressing, spectators tended to interpret the actor's face as sad; if the environment was amusing, spectators tended to interpret the actor's face as happy - although it was exactly the same face of the actor and the same scene being cut in. 
And then (3) it should be elaborated WHY the spectators interpreted the same face of the actor as sad or happy. This seems to be a challenging and important message for each movie composition. (And might make the difference of good and not so good movies...)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.168.245.188 (talk) 16:08, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled