lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Leeds City F.C.

message: Do we treat the current team in the West Yorkshire League as a continuation of this club and thus right the articles infobox with this in mind? Or do we treat them as seperate entities? - The Daddy 15:37, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I can tell this page is being treated much in the same way to many of the other clubs which have gone out of business in one way or another and then been re-started by another consortium, containing history of the original club and the more recently formed club. An example of this is Accrington Stanley F.C. having had two incarnations (excluding Accrington F.C. which would make it three). However if you feel like creating another article for the new club please create a separate article and leave the original clubs article here as generally people looking here are more likely to want info on the predicessor to Leeds United than the new Leeds City F.C. Chappy84 15:56, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the Accrington example is different as, as far as I know, the "new" Accrington Stanley was formed only a couple of years after the old one folded, by people who'd been involved in the old club, so there was a direct connection.  In the case of Leeds City there was an 80+ year gap and it was more just a case of the founders of the club deciding it would be quite cool to revive the name of an old defunct club ChrisTheDude 07:33, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

text: My two-cents worth - they are completely seperate entities, with the current club deserving nothing more than a passing mention in this article. If the "new" club reach Level 10/Step 6 and merit their own article, then we should create two articles much along the lines of the Crystal Palace articles with links to each other. As they're still at W Yorkshire Division Two at the moment, it's not something we have to consider for a couple of years! This by extension means the Leeds City F.C. article should remain categorised as a "Defunct Football Club" - fchd 16:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm with Richard, the fact that the current club decided to pick the same name as a club that existed years ago does not make them a continutaion of the "lineage" of the old club, in the same way that (even though they appear to be trying!) the Sunday league team that decided to adopt the name Clapham Rovers can't claim to be former FA Cup winners...... ChrisTheDude 07:30, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Mixing information about the present non-league club with the professional League club that existed in the early 20th century is just confusing.  They are two separate entities and should have separate articles if the present day club are notable enough to have an article at all. (86.145.190.52 (talk) 13:40, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leeds City FC 
Talk:Government of Framingham, Massachusetts

message: This article states that the Board of Selectmen serves as the town's judicial branch, but that is not true.  Boards of Selectmen do not stand in judgement.  They are the elected executives for the town.  
Acter (talk) 10:31, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That particular section was written by a member of the Framingham town meeting, so I would tend to believe him over your opinion. (no offense intended in the statement)--Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 16:01, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Ah.  You are assuming that I am not, also, a town meeting member.  (-:  Acter (talk) 12:38, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Description of local government
Talk:List of places of worship in Framingham, Massachusetts

message: Wikipedia guidelines are quite clear on this: Headers should not be Wikilinked. This is because headers in themselves introduce information and let the reader know what subtopics will be presented, similar to signposting in argumentation theory; Wikilinks should be incorporated in the text of the section. See: Wikipedia:Headers#.23Headings. Headers dewikilinked.--Kudpung (talk) 07:13, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 

message: The deletion  discussion  is now closed. However, should a new Prod or AfD be started, I would like to  go  on  record with:
*Strong  keep: Articles about places often include a section  ora sub section  on  Places of Worship. Where the section  is so  large that  it  would distract  unduly  from  the focus of the article, it  is perfectly  normal to  split it  off as a 'See main' or a 'See also'. This does not  mean  that  the encyclopedia is being  turned into  a directory - otherwise we would not  have lists  of schools, for example,  in  a similar context.--Kudpung (talk) 07:23, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion discussion
Talk:Historic places in Framingham, Massachusetts

message: I undid the move because the editor could not be bothered to:
#Inquire if any one else felt the move was appropriate;
#Did not check to see what links to it and change the links as needed;
#The list is not only of items that are on the National Register;
#It was not redundant.
--- Jeremy (talk) 18:04, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:Natacha

message: As I wasn't aware another Natacha article had been created after I began working on it, I directed it to Natacha (comics), simply assuming this was already a DAB for the many Natachas. Realizing a near identical but shorter article had been made in this articlespace, I thought it most foresightful to go ahead with the inevitable DAB.  Murghdisc. 15:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alter to DAB
Talk:Zainichi

message: Here's some evidence as to how the word "Zainichi" is used in Japanese, based on Google counts.  Set your Google preference to "Japanese" pages only:
*  : 1,290,000
*  : 633,000
*  : 595,000
*  : 464,000
*  : 426,000
*  : 328,000
*  : 165,000
*  : 60,000
*  : 43,000
*  : 32,600
*  : 10,600
*  : 463
--Endroit 16:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How the word ''Zainichi'' is used in Japanese 

message: ===Daijisen / Yahoo Japan dictionary===
外国人が日本に滞在、または居住していること。「―アメリカ人」
Translation:  Foreigners staying in Japan, or residing in Japan.  (Example: Zainichi American)--Endroit 16:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese dictionary definition of ''Zainichi'' 

message: 外国人が日本に滞在、または居住していること。「―アメリカ人」
Translation:  Foreigners staying in Japan, or residing in Japan.  (Example: Zainichi American)--Endroit 16:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Daijisen]] / Yahoo Japan dictionary

message: 外国人が、日本にいること。旧植民地出身者である在日朝鮮人をさして使うことが多い。
Translation:  Foreigners in Japan.  Often used to point out Zainichi Koreans, born in a former Japanese colony.--Endroit 16:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Daijirin]] / Yahoo Japan dictionary
Talk:Automobile pedal

message: I've added a section called either foot to use for breaking, this article is about the layout and which foot can be used to operate each of these. I also added the parking break pedal which was missing. Jon 15:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, 99.20.66.116, the pedals are the same: right pedal is gas, left pedal is clutch (if it's a manual transmission) and center/left pedal is brake. The article says so in the second sentence, "The arrangement is the same for both right- and left-hand traffic." --Bigpeteb (talk) 03:48, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

message: Is there any information on how the current arrangements of pedals came to be? Old cars like the Model T had rather different pedals. What was involved in getting different manufacturers to standardise on the pedals to such a degree that we now take the modern operation for granted? CodeCat (talk) 14:34, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Top Gear (2002 TV series) covered this in episode S10E08. From what I recall them saying, manufacturers pretty much did whatever they thought made sense; there was no "standardization", until everyone suddenly converged on one layout. Cadillac Type 53 states that it was the first car to use the modern layout, which was then copied by the Austin 7; this information appears to be based on the Top Gear episode, and doesn't cite any other sources. Bigpeteb (talk) 14:18, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History?
Talk:Senckenberg German Entomological Institute

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved as requested.  Dekimasuよ! 02:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: German Entomological Institute →  – Current English name for the institute as given at the official website. The corresponding German title is Senckenberg Deutsches Entomologisches Institut, or SDEI (from the official website in German).
Multiple online sources, e.g.  and  indicate the institute was renamed to this new title in 2009, if it helps to know. Monster Iestyn (talk) 02:05, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 July 2022
Talk:The Shrike (film)

message: It should be noted that, for a number of years, the Internet Movie Database (IMDb) has been carrying an incorrect credit for English writer Mary Hayley Bell, who was married to John Mills for 64 years. They were the parents of Juliet Mills and Hayley Mills. The incorrect credit is The Shrike (film). She is listed within IMDb here, billed 17th in the cast listings. That credit actually belongs to the American actress Mary Bell who also appeared in the Broadway version of the play and whose photograph appears in Wikimedia Commons. The same photo is appended to Wikipedia's entry for The Shrike (play).
As of this writing, the section header "Stage/film roles" in Wikipedia's entry for Mary Hayley Bell credits her with appearing on Broadway in 1928, when she was 17 years old, and in 1935, although she lived with her parents in Hong Kong, Tientsin and Singapore until 1939. There is no indication that Mary Hayley Bell, whose acting roles were confined to a handful of uncredited parts in England, ever performed in the U.S. There are two separate listings for the American actress Mary Bell in IMDb [here and here] as well as in the Internet Broadway Database (IBDb) [here and here]. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 00:14, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect IMDb listing has confused Mary Bell with Mary Hayley Bell

message: It may be also noted that, in the film's opening credits, Martin Newman is billed 10th, Herbie Faye 11th, Richard Benedict 12th and Mary Bell 13th. Below is a reproduction of the form in which the cast members are listed in the opening credits:
José Ferrer
June Allyson
with Joy Page
Kendall Clark
Isabel Bonner
Will Kuluva
Joe Comadore
Billy M. Greene
Leigh Whipper
Martin Newman
Herbie Faye
Richard Benedict
Mary Bell
Somer Alberg
Jay Barney
Edward C. Platt
Fay Morley
Jacqueline de Wit
In the closing credits, however, Richard Benedict is billed 10th, Mary Bell 11th, Martin Newman 12th and Herbie Faye 13th. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 02:34, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: The billing of four cast members differs in opening credits and closing credits
Talk:Alexander Island

message: The map does not show Alexander Island - or at least it is not labelled as such - so is there any point in the map?
Dudley Miles (talk) 22:18, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: The article states that Alexander Island is also known as Alexander Archipelago.  How can it be an island and a chain of islands?  Seems to me it's got to be one or the other, but can't be both. 138.162.128.55 (talk) 17:17, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Island or Archipelago 

message: I propose that the following articles be merged into this one:
* Brahms Inlet
* Harris Peninsula
* Liadov Glacier
All of the above articles fail WP:GEOLAND and are of the same basic character: basic information from the USGS, including lat/long coordinates, and the occasional reference to who it was named for / who discovered it.
Rather than having a multiplicity of articles whose notability is questionable at best, I believe it would be better to include information on these features on the articles for the regions they inhabit, and thereby improve the quality of each article. Note also that most of the regional articles are themselves stubs and severely lacking in substantive information; by themselves, they might also fail [[WP:GEOLAND, but with the added information from these stubs, some of them might become quite good articles, even achieving Good or Featured status. As these stubs currently stand, they are almost certainly doomed to become permastubs. J♯m (talk | contribs) 22:18, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and  Klbrain (talk) 18:41, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree, and suggest having these mergers undone, more so that they comprise just three arbitrarily chosen from 300-odd Alexander Island geographical feature articles. Similar proposals have been discussed before, notably at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Antarctica#Stubs II. Best, Apcbg (talk) 20:48, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of smaller articles 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Federal Republic of Lostisland and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 20#Federal Republic of Lostisland until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 19:17, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Federal Republic of Lostisland" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Of Fox and Hounds

message: This cartoon had some crazy credits. According to Dave Mackey's website, the original production credits read:
* Supervision: Draft No. 412 (obviously Fred "Tex" Avery)
* Story: Draft No. 1312 (this could be Rich Hogan, Dave Monahan, Jack Miller or Robert Givens)
* Animation: Draft No. 6102 (this could be Virgil Ross, Sid Sutherland, Rod Scribner, Charles McKimson, Robert McKimson or Robert Cannon)
* Musical Direction: Draft No. 158 (obviously Carl W. Stalling) 
WikiPro1981X (talk) 06:10, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crazy Credits 

message: I do believe Avery reused the same shot of the clubhouse from this cartoon in MGM's "Out Foxed" with Droopy.    --The_Iconoclast (talk) 05:27, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening Pan 

message: Shouldnt the article reference that these characters are based on Lenny and George from “Of Mice and Men” 2601:CD:C882:C150:A40D:ED27:ED00:F92A (talk) 01:20, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  of Mice and Men
Talk:Heavy Petting (2007 film)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://pro-labs.imdb.com/title/tt0491211/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 19:47, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Jossie Esteban y la Patrulla 15

message: Hello!
I was wondering whether "Agua de Coco" is the same song as "El Coco". The former is mentioned in the introduction and the latter is listed under the "Noches de Copas" album. If not, then please, do the necessary correction to avoid confusion. Is so, please, include the album which the first song belong to.
Thank you very much in advance!
George Rodney Maruri Game (talk) 21:19, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Agua de Coco" or "El Coco"? 
Talk:The Piano (soundtrack)

message: In my opinion, a mention to the traditional Scottish origins should be made for the centerpiece of the soundtrack "The Heart Asks for Pleasure First / The Promise", since it's entire melody is incredibly similar to the traditional (therefore free of copyright) Scottish song "Duthaich Mhicaoidh or the Land of Mackay".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.132.131.180 (talk) 23:55, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traditional credit for song/s "The Heart Asks for Pleasure First / The Promise"
Talk:Triumph Daytona 650

message: Created the page with the basic specifications and a brief description. Needs fleshing out and a picture/ history of it etc. NathanLee 16:06, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

message: As part of the Motorcycling WikiProject I am working though all the missing articles and stubs for British Bikes.  To make things easier to sort out I have created a category for British motorcycles.   Please will you add to any British motorcycle pages you find or create.  It will also help to keep things organised if you use the Template:Infobox Motorcycle or add it where it is missing.  I've linked the Category to the Commons British Motorcycles so you could help with matching pics to articles or adding the missing images to the Commons - take your camera next time you go to a rally!  Thanks  Tony (talk) 13:18, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Category for British Motorcycles
Talk:The Pianist (soundtrack)

message: All except one track are Chopin composition. Why is it being awarded for best music? Is the award only referring to Track 10? --Kvasir (talk) 21:58, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good Point. I think they are referring to the artist. TechOutsider (talk) 00:44, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Soundtrack not original composition

message: Would someone with better Unicode-fu put the slashes in Wladyslaw's name?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.223.178.77 (talk) 01:31, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done :P ♥ Fredil 00:40, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Misspelled name

message: In this case, to know who is the interpreter (the pianist) who plays these compositions is fundamental. Who is?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leonardo Teixeira de Oliveira (talk • contribs) 03:46, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "...The Chopin pieces were played by Polish pianist Janusz Olejniczak..." 74.60.29.141 (talk) 18:59, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Interpreter

message: Should there be a section for additional music not included on the soundtrack album?  -- I.e.:
* The cello piece played by Dorota in the middle of the film: Prelude from Bach's Cello Suite No. 1.
* Hej Strzelcy Wraz! (Hey Riflemen, together now!); a.k.a.:  Marsz strzelcow (Riflemen's march)-- Polish patriotic song by Wladyslaw Anczy.
* Et cetera (?)
~E 74.60.29.141 (talk) 19:11, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional music?
Talk:Weaver Hall Museum and Workhouse

message: #The article needs to be expanded.
#It should continue to make use of sections.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
Peter I. Vardy 16:15, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 

message: In particular the expansion should focus on the museums contents - at the moment it is dominated by the building.  For example it lends it collections to local libraries, see for example Roman Middlewich. Salinae (talk) 21:32, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kenneth Blackburne

message: i am not getting the information i want Renren19 (talk) 00:43, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  iformation please 
Talk:VoxForge

message: Sorry, got carried away with the last iteration of the VoxForge entry.  Please let me know if the current version is OK.
::Thanks for the cleanup.  BTW, you may also want to remove the links in the "External links" section that are already used in the article above.  Since they are non commercial and relevant, they appear to be OK in your article, but you shouldn't put them in both places.  Again, thanks for your efforts.  Calltech 16:27, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: More cleanup ... any chance of getting the external link to VoxForge back on the Speech Recognition page?  thanks Kmaclean 18:09, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: entry looking too much like an advertisement.
Talk:Alfred Caldwell Lily Pool

message: More images here:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/paytonc/2680109309/in/album-256786/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/paytonc/2680927970/in/album-256786/
Victor Grigas (talk) 05:25, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Mordechai Breuer

message: Can someone fix footnote 1? Slrubenstein   |  Talk 16:41, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Someone left this comment on the namespace page:
:How can anyone say that Korban Pesach was eaten immediately following Kiddush? Doesn't the well known principle dictate - Korban Pesach Ne'echal Al HaSova? (Korban Pesach is eaten after one is satisfied from the meal.) Or is he saying that this principle itself is a post Churban Rabbincal innovation?
Dunno. I'm sure somone will explain. JFW | T@lk 22:32, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: Barryfadams, the idea that the Israeli government has little or no relation to the Bible is POV and is not germane to this article. The statement that the adoption of the Jerusalem Crown by the Israeli Parliament has no religious significance for anyone seems impossible to confirm, 'religion' being a pretty broad term. However, it is definitely fact that such an adoption has no halakhic significance. Still, do you really need to stress that in this article? -- JALatimer 01:00, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halakhic relevance 

message: When a page is created for Mordechai Breuer (historian), I suggest adding a hatnote to this page:

Sorry, forgot to sign previous comment.  It was by me.  --Set theorist (talk) 10:26, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not to be confused with the historian 
Talk:Anthony Kavanagh

message: This article is inundated with embellishing words, which should come as no surprise as it is, aside from a few grammatical errors, a complete duplicate of this .pdf http://quebecomm.com/bio-Anthony%20Kavanagh.pdf which appears to be a pamphlet advertising Kavanagh's career.
A few of these embellishing words are encountered in sentences such as:
"Generous and charismatic, he charmed English and French speaking audiences alike."
"This first one-man-show was a huge success and garnered rave reviews."
"Not bad for an unknown comedian."
"He was an instead hit. He conquered Paris with “Kavanagh !” in 1999."
If this article is to adhere to Wikipedia's policy of article neutrality, a re-write is necessary.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.225.171.24 (talk) 20:11, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Montgomery Ward Company Complex

message: I'm not seeing the tower building covered here or on the disambig page. Am I missing something? Here's  a link to a soirce featuring it. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:28, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Tower Building