lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1992 Brazilian Grand Prix

message: This bot has detected that this page contains an image, :Image:Circuit_Interlagos.png, in a raster format. A replacement is available as a Scalable vector graphic (SVG) at :File:Circuit Interlagos.svg. If the replacement image is suitable please edit the article to use the vector version. Scalable vector graphics should be used in preference to raster for images that can easily represented in a vector graphic format. If this bot is in error, you may leave a bug report at its talk page Thanks SVnaGBot1 (talk) 15:04, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Image:Circuit_Interlagos.png]]
Talk:Charles Francis Adams IV

message: Why is John Adams not included on the family tree? Certainly a former president and notable Founding Father fits the definition of "notable family members".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.162.54.17 (talk) 21:14, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Adams, Sr. 
Talk:Brigitte Helm

message: Otto Dietrich was a Reichsleiter, the Nazi Party Press Chief, State Secretary in the Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda and Obergruppenführer of the SS. Actually I can't believe someone   tries to use him as a WP:RS. And just in case you read this: WP:SCHOLARSHIP, WP:PRIMARY, WP:BIASED are the obvious rlevant policies. 2003:D2:B70A:C6D0:7999:CE18:B4D3:985D (talk) 07:36, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Otto Dietrich 
Talk:Better Regulation Commission

message: It seems a bit odd to limit an entry on Better Regulation to UK initiatives, structures and experiences only. I will try to contribute some text on Better Regulation in the EU and in other countries, OECD initiatives etc. Would it be a good idea do rename this page? Something like Better Regulation in the UK?  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Robertus (talk • contribs) 15:17, 20 October 2006.
:It seems to me that "Better Regulation" is a somewhat vague concept not worthy of an encyclopedia entry.  Since this article is about an initiative of the UK government, an initiative which has now taken the form of the Better Regulation Commission, I'll move the article to that title.  --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 12:43, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Farmers Classic

message: There is a long, ongoing discussion at WP:Tennis about the tournament tables found in tennis articles on English-language Wikipedia (e.g., this type of table). The discussion is about whether the "official sponsored name" of a tournament - such as Pacific Life Open - or another tournament name without the sponsor - such as Indian Wells Masters - must be used in those articles. Please join the discussion here. Thanks.  Tennis expert (talk) 08:45, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for wider input on discussion at WikiProject Tennis
Talk:1988 Italian Grand Prix

message: Fastest lap was set on lap 44 not 43, I can see it now on the screen on an archived video but obviously cant use video as a source. If anyone has this information in a citable source, please change.
82.13.35.10 (talk) 05:17, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Autocourse confirms lap 44. Changed. DH85868993 (talk) 11:21, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fastest lap incorrect
Talk:Dassault Ouragan

message: This article is generally restructured to comply with Assessment Criteria 3 of Class B of Assessment Quality scale. Overall the article is in good shape. A Reassessment is requested to assign Class B.perseus71 (talk) 19:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup of Structure 

message: According to the feedback received at the last assessment, this article has four bibliographic references, but footnotes only apply to two. I have added my won reference from Dassault Aviation. I don't have access to the Bibiliographic refereces myself. If someone else has access to them. Can you please provide appropriate citation ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Perseus71 (talk • contribs) 16:35, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation Needed 

message: This article is structured well, and written well. There are a number of citation needed tags which should be addressed prior to the article's promotion. Overall, good work. Lazulilasher (talk) 17:58, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WP France B class assessment
Talk:Joe Adcock

message: Bill James's "The Baseball Book 1990" has a 4+ page article on Adcock.
He says, "It may bother you a little that Adcock's reported date of birth is October 30, 1927, but he went to LSU in the fall of '44 ... ; it makes one suspect a 'baseball age'." Hazelmaye (talk) 13:23, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adcock's birth date 

message: I have a clear personal memory of sportswriters in Shreveport, some 30 miles from Coushatta, referring to Adcock as "Joe Bill," rather than "Billy Joe."  This would have been in the mid 50's.
But maybe that was his downhome call name, rather than a sports nickname. Hazelmaye (talk) 13:28, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adcock's nickname 
Talk:1990 German Grand Prix

message: Regarding the recent repeated edits to this page by an anonymous IP address (220.221.17.213 & 222.225.117.108) - the F1 results at www.formula1.com use 'collision', 'spun off' etc, which are more specific and informative. Assuming good faith on the part the anonymous editor - please state your reasons for continuously altering the results here from those at the official site. The changes have been reported, reluctantly, as apparent vandalism. As always - glad to talk: --4u1e 15:02, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collision > Accident 
Talk:Vladimer Papava

message: A lengthy CV-style hagiography that I've tried to turn into at least a decent stub. Been reverted twice; the anon even removed the categories. Maybe this guy doesn't even pass WP:BIO. There also was an effort to get Necroeconomics (topic of Papava's book) included; it got deleted after an AfD. Lupo 14:39, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that notability is established, and it meets WP:BIO as a subject, but this article does need quite a bit of work to meet the guidelines. It may be the subject who is doing the reverts. If the subject does not wish for others to edit/improve this article, then they should not have an article on Wikipedia. Pretty simple concept. Crockspot 15:49, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I started to templatize a few of the books. The templates and instructions can be found at WP:CTT in the "Citations of generic sources" section. Crockspot 15:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book templates 
Talk:King Ecgbert School

message: My recollection is that King Egberts was a Girls Grammar well before 1961. 
I hadn't been aware that Mercia and Wessex were two kings who met in Dore and indeed a reference would be welcome.  roundhouse 14:37, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've since modified the page. It does seem that King Ecgbert of Wessex had connections with Dore. roundhouse 14:34, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliability of page 
Talk:Corporate promoter

message: This article is extremely confusing. It lacks sufficient context for readers untutored in law and corporate theory. It just proceeds as if it were in media res in some law textbook. The confusing content needs to be clarified before copyediting work is done. Rintrah 14:39, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The only thing I found confusing about the article is its supposed legal aura.  I searched extensively in Google, and the SEC site together with some law sites and found no such term.  Granted, there may be legal issues involved in corporate promotion, as there is in many other activities but it is not, per se, a legal topic.  --JAXHERE | Talk 01:53, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The following appears as the second heading of the article. 
MEANING OF PROMOTERS'
    promotor is a person who enanged in his formation of company.
This is so obviously flawed that I intend to revise it. Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 20:33, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  promoters' (sic) 

message: An earlier term for "corpporate promoter" is "projector". I know this from extensive reading or various nineteenth-century material, especially the Dictionary of National Biography, but also novels by Dickens and even more recent novels set in the nineteenth century, e.g., Hornblower. I need to link "projector" to this article, but I do not know how to find a reference to cite that will let be add "projector" to this article. -Arch dude (talk) 20:06, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  projector
Talk:1990 Canadian Grand Prix

message: I have assessed this as a Stub Class, as it does not go into any details about the event at all, and of low priority as it a highly specific topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 00:50, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Was Berger / the McLaren team aware of the penalty during the race? If so, could they have got Senna to back up the other cars to allow Berger's one-minute penalty to slot him into 2nd place?--MartinUK (talk) 23:39, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The race report in AUTOCOURSE indicates that McLaren were immediately made aware of the penalty and informed both drivers by radio. I guess Senna could have tried to back up the other cars, but it would have been a pretty delicate balancing act to slow them down enough to enable Berger to finish ahead of them, without risking his own race lead. DH85868993 (talk) 06:23, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Berger's penalty
Talk:1994 Australian Grand Prix

message: I reckon this article should have a disputed neutrality banner, as I feel it's unnecessary to mention Jerez 1997 and Monaco 2006 in this race. The whole tone of the article is very anti-Schumacher. I would put a banner in myself, but I don't know how. 80.41.247.82 (talk) 03:21, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality dispute

message: This article should really have the definitive and most detailed report on the Schumacher-Hill incident. I've made a start by cutting and pasting the material from Michael Schumacher, Damon Hill and 1994 Formula One season to the page, but it needs copyediting and reviewing for evidence and NPOV. Cheers. 4u1e
I wonder if it should also mention that an extremely similar incident happened in the exact same circumstances at Jerez in 1997.
Camcurwood (talk) 15:32, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really. This article is about the 1994 Australian Grand Prix, and events that occurred in it. Is it relevant to people's understanding of this GP? Or just to MS's character? If the latter, then that's the article the comparison belongs in. AlexJ (talk) 19:33, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title deciding collision
Talk:Hines Holt

message: This article was started using public domain information from the Biographical Directory of the United States Congress. LarryQ 14:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk 1 

message: No mention of slave-owning. I feel that this category should be restricted to people whose slave-owning history was notable in itself. Valetude (talk) 12:35, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:American slave owners
Talk:Harihara

message: I've been a bit on the bold side with recent edits, but the page needed it. Going ahead I feel more arguments are needed as detailed sub-sections under the 'Different concepts' section (in order to create more of a balance to the page). Also it would be nice to have information specifically on Harihara, not concerning the debate on Vishnu & Shiva. Ys, GourangaUK 14:48, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edits
Talk:Combat (juggling)

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 14:48, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikified

message: "Holding one club while juggling the others in one hand is not permitted." -- I'm not sure where this came from, but as someone who's played plenty of combat, I can assure you that is very much permitted.  In fact, one of the major strategic ways to win at combat is to juggle two clubs in one hand while swinging the other club at someone else's juggling pattern. The main problem, however, is that's somewhat more difficult to do than the basic 3 club juggling pattern.  Anyway, since the link page that describes the official rules doesn't mention that and it goes against my personal experience, I'm going to remove that "rule". Lovelace (talk) 18:28, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Holding one club

message: I have made some major changes to the article and would appreciate it if someone could read over the text, as I'm not a native speaker. I removed the "strategies" section. In my opinion, this is not an important content for the article, but of course this can be discussed. ---enzyklop- (talk) 20:52, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: Combat without touching opponent
-- why is this nonsense an article title
Juggle boxing its not
Combbat its not
Article needs gone  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:CDA0:1060:3D07:F34F:7233:48DA (talk) 07:08, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  No touch
Talk:SQLJ

message: > It is more efficient than JDBC since the SQL statements are parsed and the access paths are optimized at compile time rather than runtime.
Ridiculous. SQLJ is simply a precompiler syntax. In Oracle, it's like all other precompilers. The ONLY difference, w/r to compiling, is that SQLJ, since it is a precompiler, will check the syntax is valid. It does NOT optimize at this point, since there is no way to save the optimized plan (other than manually creating a stored plan). So both SQLJ and JDBC will be parsed and compiled the wsame way at run-time.
> It provides better authorization control: Authorization can be granted to programs rather than users. 
== 
What the hell is this about????? ==
?
- SQLJ programs are easier to write and to maintain. They also tend to be shorter than equivalent JDBC programs.
I would like to know in what they are easier to write and maintain? The syntax is nearly the same as plain SQL and the statements are tighly coupled in the Java code which in my sense make the program far less easy to maintain. Any change in your SQL will need a full build of your application like for plain SQL, if this is ease of maintenance I am not living on the same planet.
- It is more efficient than JDBC since the SQL statements are parsed and the access paths are optimized at compile time rather than runtime.
I think this is marketing bullshit only, except checking the syntax at compile time there is nothing that will allow you to especially optimize access paths.
- It provides better authorization control: Authorization can be granted to programs rather than users.
Like the previous user, I would ask you what are you talking about??? SQLJ does not manage anything like that in my sense
- Potential performance problems, such as inefficient queries due to a bad access path, can be identified at development time.
Well if your query has bad access path it won't be an inefficient query but an erroneous one...
- There is no SQLJ support for most of the common persistence frameworks, such as Hibernate.
I really don't see the point here to be able or not to use SQLJ with Hibernate as these two have a tottaly different goal.
66.131.36.87 22:34, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have largely rewritten the advantages section to remove unsourced opinions. Jon 13:51, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Grace Mirabella

message: Could someone describe the term "vaginal removal", please..? Sounds a bit peculiar. Is there any more information somewhere about this? - Aatox 14:50, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was going to ask the same question. Maybe it means hysterectomy? But I'm no scientist. --Dangherous 14:11, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Betty Boop and the Little King

message: I took out the second paragraph Kharkless put in about Little King and Van Beuren because it seemed like speculation, rather than a citable fact.  If you can find a source that backs up that statement, it should be re-inserted and cited.Konczewski 14:53, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Little King and Van Beuren Studios
Talk:1994 Hungarian Grand Prix

message: This article is currently wearing a copyright violation tag. The text was certainly taken from grandprix.com, but the material now remaining should be OK.
As far as I know, results of sporting events cannot be copyrighted. The format in which they are presented can be, but there are limited ways of presenting these results. The format used on this page is very close, but not identical to that used in the Grandprix.com report from which the copyright violation is claimed. (There is an extra column and one heading is different). The only other changes which could really be made would be in rearranging the order of the columns, but I think a claim that the order of the columns represented a unique way of interpreting the data would be very weak. Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 18:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the tag. After my huge mistake earlier this year, which I will never do again, this was the the version before the copy-vio was entered. I'll quickly go round the 1994 + 95 articles and remove any more offending material. Davnel03 22:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks. I think I picked up the rest of the 94 stuff yesterday, but then I ran out of enthusiasm for the task. ;-) Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 09:58, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyrighting results
Talk:1994 Canadian Grand Prix

message: Is it worth mentioning the temporary chicane added for this season and the next as a result of the new safety measures brought in by the FIA? --80.4.6.146 (talk) 16:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Droit de Casino

message: I have assessed this as a Stub Class, as it does not go into much details about the event, and of low priority as it a highly specific topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 00:52, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (1916 film)

message: There's reference here to the use of mirrors in shooting the underwater scenes - "Actual underwater cameras were not used, but a system of watertight tubes and mirrors allowed the camera to shoot reflected images of underwater scenes staged in shallow sunlit waters." I've seen this stated elsewhere but suspect it's not true. The LOC reference cited actually contradicts this - saying "In search of authenticity, Williamson always took his camera to the ocean floor, never settling for the ease of shooting in a tank…" Another article, also from a pretty authoritative source, an American maritime museum, https://www.marinersmuseum.org/2019/12/a-portable-hole-in-the-sea/ describes an extensible tube with an iron bell at the bottom (the 'photosphere') in which the camera operator sat with camera. I haven't edited the entry since I'm not 100% sure I'm right about this but I think this is more likely to be true. bowbrick (talk) 14:12, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Underwater production technique
Talk:1994 Portuguese Grand Prix

message: Christian Fittipaldi is listed in the qualifying. He debuted in 2014. Maybe you meant Emerson? Wolf O'Donnel (talk) 02:59, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Christian Fittipaldi debuted in F1 in 1992 - see Christian_Fittipaldi#Complete_Formula_One_results. Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 03:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok. I was looking at the WeatherTech Championship. Wolf O'Donnel (talk) 03:43, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian Fittipaldi
Talk:Angie (1994 film)

message: "This film was released on the same day John Candy passed away." shouldn't this be removed john candy isn't in this movie.141.157.225.225 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 01:28, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  relevance?
Talk:1994 Brazilian Grand Prix

message: This bot has detected that this page contains an image, :Image:Circuit_Interlagos.png, in a raster format. A replacement is available as a Scalable vector graphic (SVG) at :File:Circuit Interlagos.svg. If the replacement image is suitable please edit the article to use the vector version. Scalable vector graphics should be used in preference to raster for images that can easily represented in a vector graphic format. If this bot is in error, you may leave a bug report at its talk page Thanks SVnaGBot1 (talk) 15:04, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Image:Circuit_Interlagos.png]]
Talk:Children of the Damned

message: The group of kids strangely remind me of The Delightful Children From Down The Lane from Kids Next Door. RocketMaster 22:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kids Next Door 

message: In Italian the movie was titled La stirpe dei dannati (The Lineage of the Damned), and in Spanish, Los hijos de los malditos (The Sons of the Accursed) in Spain, and El germen de las bestias (The Germ of the Beasts) in Latin America. --Manfariel (talk) 23:40, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  In other languages
Talk:Crossing Delancey

message: The film was on this chart:
BEST SPECIALIZED BOX OFFICE IN 1988
in the very L.A. Times article cited as proof of "the film was unsuccessful". 
The film had a low budget and earned back several times its production cost. It was considered an arthouse success at the time of its release..
This box office assessment needs to be revised.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Groove68 (talk • contribs) 11:03, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box Office
Talk:Daddy's Little Girls

message: Is Madea gonna be in this movie? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.153.247.210 (talk • contribs) 
:Doesn't look like it. Real96 17:24, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Madea?

message: The plot summary badily needs a facelift. Search how many times the word "senseless" appears in the article. I guess the the only way the author knows how to describe a beating is "senseless!!!".
:Yea honestly the summary is absurd, just plain terrible really.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.61.50.94 (talk) 19:48, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Senseless rewrite?

message: I just watched this, and besides two, maybe three humerous moments, this was not funny. I'm not saying I didn't enjoy the comedy, I'm saying there is none. This isn't a comedy. It's a flat out drama. If there's any reason its tagged as a comedy-drama, I'd like to hear it.
:No objections? Good stuff. "drama" it is. -Gohst (talk) 10:20, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comedy-Drama?

message: It still doesn't read that well, too many details this should be a quick 2-3 paragraph summary, not a book of almost every scene.
Its too long, I didn't read it and I doubt anyone would. EarthWormSpence (talk) 03:14, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot needs serious work.
Talk:Ilya Smirin

message: I presume that "Ilia" and "Ilya" are different ways of transliterating the same (originally Russian) name.  I wrote an article on Ilya Smirin without knowing that the Ilia Smirin one existed. The two obviously should be merged under one name or the other.  Which one? I don't know about other countries, but in the U.S. at least "Ilya" is the way I normally see it written.  FIDE, however, lists it under "Ilia" -- which might make it appropriate to put the article under that spelling. Brittle heaven, in the Ilya Smirin history, wrote, "Please note this page is effectively a duplicate of Ilia Smirin. Someone ought to delete that one as this is better and the name more popular." Brittle heaven is English, so maybe "Ilya" is the usual spelling in the U.K., too. Accordingly, I propose putting the article under Ilya Smirin, with Ilia Smirin redirecting there. I don't have a marked preference, though, so if people think it's better to have the article under Ilia Smirin instead, that's OK, too. Krakatoa 15:05, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No need to delete, it should be merged and then made a redirect.  I'll do that now.  (Agree with your analysis of Ilia vs. Ilya -- normally I'd go with what FIDE uses, but it seems Ilya Smirin is more common in the English speaking world.  It could always be changed later to go the other way.) 24.177.112.146 06:39, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: old talk