lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Grass skippers

message: I came across the article Metron while disambiguating Metron, that I thought may refer to the red link in this article?  —Aladdin Sane (talk) 01:31, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I fixed the link. DGERobertson (talk) 23:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metron (skipper) 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Pelopidas sp.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on November 3, 2010. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2010-11-03. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 20:31, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Pelopidas sp.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Gray hairstreak

message: quote:  "However, they do mainly use mallows and legumes as their preferred host plant. They commonly use clovers as their food plant as well, eating rabbit-foot clover (Trifolium arvense), white clover (T. repens), bush clover (Lespedeza capitata), white sweet-clover (Melilotis alba), and Malva neglecta."
All the clovers mentioned are legumes and the last item is a mallow.  Perhaps this could be worded differently?  Perhaps say 'legumes, especially clovers'? Ealtram (talk) 22:18, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "as well"
Talk:Chrysochus cobaltinus

message: This article describes that these beetles are able to launch themselves a couple times the length of their body but does not detail the mechanism behind this process or what the significance of this behavior is. Additional information should be added. Good that you included group behavior in the spring when large groups feeds on various plants within the same area of distribution. Could add information about whether there are any observed differences in feeding behavior between males and females  Hipper2305 (talk) 18:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Behavior 

message: Overall this was a very cool article, providing the reader with pertinent information regarding the cobalt milkweed beetle. The edits I made involved some simple syntax changes. These changes are meant to standardize the tone across all sections, which were slightly varying in formalness. One thing I would add to this article is additional references. Otherwise, it was very intriguing to learn about such a rare bug.
Sbimal (talk) 03:26, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jaden.l17 (talk) 21:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Behavioral Ecology 2024

message: I enjoyed the content of this. There was a lot of important points made about the beetle species. There was a lot of important and helpful information on the mating behaviors of these beetles. I found it very interesting that the male beetle will mount the female beetle and remain stationary for an extended period. I did add some changes. I included a section about the genetics of the beetle and there is genetic differentiation with the blue milkweed based on geographical region. The section also included diet differences between its sister species. Additionally, I added more information in the mating section. This section includes hybridizing between C. cobaltinus and C. auratus and the effects of doing so. The impacts of hybridizing affects each sister species differently, so including that section was important in my opinion.
Connectscience0224 (talk 05:56, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Did you know nomination
Talk:Green hairstreak

message: I found it interesting that the green hairstreak has the largest range of food plants compared to other butterflies in Britain. It is because I have a large appetite as well.  I really like the contrasting colors of the butterfly’s upper and under side; how one is brown and the other green, respectively.  Part of the butterfly’s scientific name means beautiful eyebrows and I thought that was strange for a butterfly to be named that.  I thought the article included some nice photos of the butterfly.  It is very clear that this article is in the beginning stages compared to other wiki pages.  More information can be throughout article.  This article could be organized differently, for example, habitat and distribution could be moved farther up and not at the end.  I think that life cycle and behavior can be separated and unpacked better.  There is no lead section in the article and I think that if it was added then it would help could give more insight to what type of butterfly this beside the fact that the underside is green.  Another category that can be added is information about conservation because it was stated that colonies in the United Kingdom have been lost so I think it would be pertinent to add what actions are being taken t keep the species alive.  Another category that would be useful to have is the mating system between sexes and in sexes.  It is because I would like to know how males interact with females to be chosen by them.  Also, I would like to know how males outcompete each other to win the attention of a female. Other comments have not been made on this article, which means that only the minimum amount of information was found and used.   This article has been rated Stub-class and low-importance. However, it has the potential to be a great article. WAdekunle (talk) 05:45, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Chrysomya putoria

message: Margaret, this is a really good article! There is tons of information, everything is well cited, and well written. There were a couple things I think were still confusing, especially for a general audience. When describing larva, you talk about spiracles and spiracular openings. That description is confusing. I added a Wiki link to a page on spiracles, so that should be helpful to a general audience, but I think the language needs clarification. It also would be great if you described what a frons is-I struggled to find it on the Wiki page linked, but there isn't one specific to frons. Also there's no Wiki page for synanthropy, which seems an important adjective for this fly, so definitely explaining that term would be helpful to a general audience. You mention that these flies have parasitic relationships with bacteria, so I think it would be cool if you could expand that and include a section on their microbiome or if they have an mutalistic relationships. Also I know most blow flies have oviposition, so including a section on parental care and seeing if they also oviposit would be good!Montana.sievert (talk) 00:56, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Behavioral Ecology Peer Review 

message: I've been using this article in a demonstration at Lincoln University, New Zealand, of how Wikipedia articles work. Good job! —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 23:29, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A good example
Talk:Hamearis lucina

message: This is a UK Biodiversity Action Plan (2007) species—GRM 15:11, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance rating 

message: The Imago section is empty bar a photo --Alastair Rae (talk) 11:46, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imago 

message: OK, it can (and should?) be done, but I don't have a lot of time. Will get to it when I can—GRM (talk) 21:41, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I miss an explanation why they are called "Duke of Burgundy"... I consider this all the more sad - and, to be honest, a little despicable - as the main page quotation plays expressly on that designation... --Terminally uncool (talk) 07:58, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: According to this reference (in the expandable 'History' section), it was first (?) named thus by "Harris (1766)". This would be Moses Harris in his 1766 The Aurelian or natural history of English insects (67 years previously another writer had called it "Mr. Vernon's Small Fritillary"). However, no mention of the name's origin is given in the 1840 New Edition of Harris's work. As a former amateur lepidopterist I don't recall ever encountering an explanation. I had wondered if it was due to some fancied resemblance to the coat of arms of the Dukes of Burgundy, but there is no obvious correlation. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 2.123.24.56 (talk) 00:44, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "Duke of Burgundy"??? 
Talk:Hasora chromus

message: Detailed description ex Watson is transferred here for records, a simplified description easier to use has been placed on the article.
::Male and female dark vinaceous brown. Male with suffused blackish subbasal patch ; both wings greyish brown basally. Cilia greyish brown. Head and thorax greenish brown. Abdomen brown. Underside with the apex of forewing suffused with purple blue ; hindwing with a narrow transverse discal bluish white band, a blackish patch on anal lobe, exterior to which the cilia have a short white line.  Female paler brown ; forewing with two yellowish semi-transparent discal spots, and a very small similar spot before the apex.Watson, E. Y. (1891) Hesperiidae indicae. Vest and Co. Madras.
AshLin 17:52, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Detailed description ex Watson
Talk:People of Praise

message: Relating to Amy Barrett and the domination of husbands. Doug Weller talk 16:27, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 more sources 

message: I've just realised that the lead doesn't reflect the criticism in the article. See also my sources above. Doug Weller talk 16:03, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Heath fritillary

message: *Conservation—Habitat management (from BC, n.d.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grmanners (talk • contribs) 21:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do list 

message: Hello,
below are some areas and points in the article that I believe need expansion. These are all open the debate, but I feel that they would strengthen the article. 
* Renaming the Habits section to Behavior to match other well received butterfly articles. 
* Adding information regarding behavior, which may include feeding, predator interaction, or breeding area selection. 
* Creating a separate section for migration. Even though they are very sedentary, it might be useful to highlight that fact in a migration section, so it isn't lost in the habits.
Slzeng (talk) 19:26, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Behavioral Ecology Student - Peer Review 

message: Hi GRM,
Will keep adding points below. Some are, of course, suggestions and open to debate. Others may be points pertaining to FA/GA but why wait till we get there? Kill those points now, is how I feel. Hope these points are adequate to get you started!
AshLin (talk) 16:47, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Peer Review - Heath Fritillary 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:P1160778 Melitaea athalia.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 5, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-05-05. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:15, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:P1160778 Melitaea athalia.jpg]] to appear as POTD 
Talk:List of Sailor Moon episodes/Archive 1

message: *Fandubs are not official.  I know there's an English version of Sailor Stars floating around.  It's done by fans, and is sanctioned by neither Toei nor Takeuchi-sensei.  Stop re-adding the misinformation. Danny Lilithborne 00:52, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fandubs

message: Why is the page protected?? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 208.101.14.2 (talk • contribs) .
*Check the page history; it speaks for itself. Danny Lilithborne 00:57, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Protected

message: For "exact translations", there's some pretty serious grammatical errors.  I'll get to them shortly. MSJapan 00:12, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Exact translations" 

message: Hey, I just wanted to say that I added the lyrics to the Moonlight Legend opening theme. I took the translation from several places around the web so if someone wants to edit any errors there may be that would be appreciated. Also, maybe the songs/lyrics should have their own page and all the songs can go on it? Just a thought. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.67.155.187 (talk • contribs) .
:I have removed the japanese lyrics, as they are probably copyrighted by the creator. See the song guidelines to learn more about this. I have left the english ones, but I do not believe it should stay. If it does, it needs some formatting. -- ReyBrujo 18:05, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Theme Songs

message: Shouldn't the dub titles be less conspicuous (listed second, not bold) than the Japanese? This is of course the English Wikipedia, but that's covered by the title being translated. Surely the original version of something should be listed first, not hidden under its derivative. --Masamage 00:37, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dub titles 

message: What company backed this series? Toei? --Masamage 00:47, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Answer: Yes. --Masamage 15:39, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publisher 

message: I don't think we should use this episode list format. It emphasizes the dub titles, which have nothing to do with the original titles--especially since many are omitted, combined, or have never been dubbed at all. It looks awful. --Masamage 23:45, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The exact look of the table is pretty flexible with the template. The main idea is to be able to use the parameters such as "air date" and "title" to make formatting changes easily as well as further article maintenance. We could even make a specific SM episode template with it's own look. -- Ned Scott 00:16, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, that looks amazing. I had no idea it could be so dynamic; no wonder it's becoming the standard table format for these things. Thank you very much! I am much better educated now, and the list looks excellent. :) --Masamage 00:20, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode table
Talk:Hesperia (butterfly)

message: * Merge - Pamphila (genus) is a stub and a synonym for Hesperia (butterfly).  I don't see a reason for two articles.
*Merge. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a taxonomic database that demands a dedicated page for each taxon, valid or not. If all or most of the former species of Pamphila can be described in Hesperia (or their respective species article), then so be it. --Animalparty! (talk) 23:31, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 12:43, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposing merge from synonym stub ''Pamphila'' (genus) to accepted name ''Hesperia'' (butterfly)
Talk:High brown fritillary

message: This is a UK Biodiversity Action Plan species—GRM 14:56, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance rating 

message: Hello everyone, 
For a class I am currently taking I did extensive alterations on this article and updated sections and headings and information. I believe the article has been improved by my edits, or at least there is more information where there was not before. 
Thanks!
Iginsberg (talk) 03:57, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi! I added in a few more facts from the sources you listed and added a few references to those sources in your article.
Hello,
I moved the taxobox toward the top of the page and unlinked it from the description section. I also added an additional picture showing the dorsal and ventral view of the butterfly next to the description. There is a lot of good info here and the sections are really helpful, but I noticed a lot of it wasn't cited. I added another cited source, and included some information from here in the "Habitat" section, but still most of the facts in the article aren't directly cited and I couldn't access all of the sources to try to add them. Also, it looks like two of the sources listed are the same article - Bracken for Butterflies- but I couldn't figure out how to remove the redundant citation. 
Good luck with any further edits! --Kaylaholthaus (talk) 02:29, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is a great article! I would suggest adding to your lead section to make it more informative to further reflect the information in your article. Additionally, I would suggest moving the photo gallery to after the description section so that the images reflect what is written in that section. Keep up the good work!  Meganav (talk) 11:47, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  WashU Class
Talk:Idea leuconoe

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Idea leuconoe Weiße Baumnymphe crop.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on October 29, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-10-29. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 17:21, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Idea leuconoe Weiße Baumnymphe crop.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 
Talk:Junonia

message: Junonia does not occur in Europe either. Please correct the information. I do not want to tamper with the article's sources so I ask someone else to correct it instead. Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35673860/
Thank you BioRB (talk) 13:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution - false information
Talk:Junonia orithya

message: This article is very 'Asio-centric' (27 July 2010) - this butterfly occurs over a wide area with many subspecies from Africa to Australia - I will be adding more info and pics from a South African perspective, but additional contributions from elseware will be needed to balance the article. Michaelwild (talk) 05:57, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: Use this: https://bit.ly/2NIFJ24 AshLin (talk) 05:31, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shortened url 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Junonia orithya-Thekkady-2016-12-03-001.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for January 23, 2024. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2024-01-23. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 19:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Georgia Army National Guard

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 14:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Large copper

message: Is there a 'Endangered Lepidoptera' -category? This species should at least be there, though in eastern europe this is only rare.
:I haven't the faintest but there defiantly should be one. -- IvanTortuga 00:13, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Endangered Lepidoptera

message: Just for information, there is international (but friendly) disagreement on the conjugation of the remaining northern fenland subspecies: L. d. batavus in the UK; L. d. batava in the Netherlands.
-- GRM (talk) 17:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subspecies
Talk:Coenonympha tullia

message: This is a UK Biodiversity Action Plan (2007) species—GRM 15:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That fact doesn't by itself give the article a "high" rating. Generally species are "low" in the importance scale. Dger (talk) 01:01, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance rating
Talk:Large tortoiseshell

message: I'm pretty sure that the image on the article is of a SMALL tortoiseshell: see http://www.butterfly-conservation.org/Butterfly/17/Butterfly.html?ButterflyId=39&Country=sc&Size=&Colour=&Features=&Family= c.f. http://www.butterfly-conservation.org/Butterfly/17/Butterfly.html?ButterflyId=63&Country=sc&Size=&Colour=&Features=&Family=. However, in the absence of an image to fix it with (not that I know how to) it'll have to stay until someone more expert than I comes along. 195.194.161.74 (talk) 13:05, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Image was changed. I assume new one is correct? Dger (talk) 17:17, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph
Talk:Leptosia nina

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Leptosia nina-Kadavoor-2017-05-04-003.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for July 23, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-07-23. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:17, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Colias chrysotheme

message: Beutiful rare butterfly you can see on http://www.fotohanc.wz.cz/
http://www.fotohanc.wz.cz/Fotogalerie/Mot%C3%BDli%20%28Lepidoptera%29%20-%20Butterflies/B%C4%9Bl%C3%A1skovit%C3%AD%20%28Pieridae%29%20-%20Whites/slides/Colias_chrysotheme_7681a.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.62.224.13 (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Libythea lepita

message: Libythea celtis lepita is still the recognised name. Is there some way to avoid WP:OR and still give species status?--Wloveral (talk) 04:59, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: EOL http://www.eol.org/taxa/16651468 indicates full species status for lepita. May be settled using  Kawahara, A. Y. 2006. Biology of the snout butterflies (Nymphalidae, Libytheinae), Part 1: Libythea Fabricius. Transactions of the lepidopterological Society of Japan 57:13-33. Shyamal (talk) 05:13, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, indeed. Tree of Life also agrees with full species status for Libythea lepita Moore, 1857. Could you make the necessary changes to this article? Best wishes from Brazil.--Wloveral (talk) 05:41, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Libythea celtis lepita
Talk:Long-tailed skipper

message: I just uploaded a photo if you need another image of the long-tailed skipper's characteristic resting wing folds. 
It may be found at File:Urbanus on zinnia.jpg   Trilobitealive (talk) 01:14, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Talk:Lulworth skipper

message: This is a UK Biodiversity Action Plan (2007) species—GRM 15:18, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance rating 

message: *"Due to their likeness to the rays around the eye of a peacock's feather, these are often known as 'sun-ray' markings, and they can faintly appear on males." — what have "peacock's eye feathers" got to do with "sun rays"?
:*I'm not sure, but it's referred to in two of the books I have on Lulworth Skipper's.
*Need to mention this is a UK BAP species
*What about physical description of caterpillar, pupa and egg?
:*
*Can you source any additional images to liven up the entry?
:*I could try, but it's been an awful summer here in Dorset. I haven't had any oppurtunity to actually photograph any!
*Cross-reference detailed taxonomy on Wikispecies?
:*What do you mean by cross-reference? I'll take a look at its taxonomy there, I quite forgot WikiSpecies existed to be honest. 
*What is the system used for vulnerability/conservations status? (Add to taxobox)
:*Quite honestly, I'm not sure. I'll find out.
**I am not sure this is ready for an upgrade to "B" class just yet. Maybe ask on Leps project page for further peer review...?
—GRM (talk) 19:19, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: *Okay I shall do that once I've made these and more changes. Thanks again. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 20:33, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgrading / clarifications