Talk:Mesotherapy

message: My goal is to help make this page as informative as the acupuncture page. My question is... when does it stop being a "stub"?
I have added some physician's concerns about mesotherapy to the page. Philiphughesmd 18:11, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improve page 

message: As per the Wikipedia:External links page, I'm submitting a link for your review...
MesotherapyHandbook.com
It's been listed on this article since its creation as while I am the owner, I can say it's the only non-social media site that discusses mesotherapy objectively from the "patient perspective." It was removed for the first time yesterday with a group of others, with a comment tagging the entire group as spam. My site has no advertising nor does it sell a product or service. As to the remaining links also being spam (as stated by Deli_nk yesterday), please note that three of were selected and added because are associations/societies of practitioners that are internationally representative.
Rest assured that my contributions to this page (which was started with the lofty goal to make it as informative as the Acupuncture page here on Wikipedia) are honorable and based on a genuine interest in this therapeutic approach and its expanding number of applications both in North America and in Europe where it was founded. Looking forward to the input of other contributors on this matter! Maltiti 01:52, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Link Review 

message: Correct me if I'm wrong, but mesoderm is a temporary tissue type found in the embryo - it does not persist into the adult human body. It is not found under the skin - this is primarily connective tissue, a derivative of mesoderm but certainly not mesoderm itself. I find the term highly misleading and the whole concept a little hard to swallow -- Serephine / talk - 10:51, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading? 

message: This article was a pretty poor entry which was putting the cart wayyyy before the horse in re. to having established either utility or safety. In point of fact there is still almost no peer-reviewed outcome data on this and the lack of standardization of what's injected is frightening to most of us who work in this field. The editorial tone here needs to pull back signifigantlyDroliver 18:47, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer review?

message: I am curious if anyone has used this and their personal results?
Please note: this is very incomplete and inaccurate. I have used Mesotherapy for pain relief with very satisfactory results. Mesotherapy is not purely cosmetic.
Pedrocs (talk) 10:53, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This talk page is not for sharing personal anecdotes regarding mesotherapy. If that's what you're looking for go somewhere else. This page is only for discussing topics related to this article alone. Read Wikipedia rules and guidelines if you are not familiar. ask123 (talk) 16:20, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Results? 

message: I just began to edit the criticism section. It is filled with horribly misleading information -- no to mention the fact that some of the information is simply false. Mesotherapy isn't a surgical procedure. That's why these quotes from the surgical societies are ridiculous. Mesotherapy is an alternative to cosmetic surgery. Cosmetic surgeons compete with mesotherapy practitioners for patients. Having negative quotes from the plastic surgery society or from cosmetic surgeons is not of much value here. Historically, the two fields have criticized each other for everything under the sun. Is mesotherapy a perfect treatment, no. But it certainly shouldn't be demonized like it is in this section. There are many criticisms of mesotherapy that are valid. But this section doesn't really cover them properly. So I'm overhauling the whole thing ask123 (talk) 16:18, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing criticism section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mesotherapy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120216205630/http://www.conseil-etat.fr/node.php?articleid=2372 to http://www.conseil-etat.fr/node.php?articleid=2372
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:36, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)