Talk:I'll See You in Court

message: I have rated this article as B-class. You cover the 3 important parts for articles on Tv episodes (plot, response and production). I think it's ready for peer review and then on to FA or GA nomination. I have rated it as low importance because individual episode articles are not of high importance to the project as a whole. --Opark 77 10:14, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The references need to be formatted in more depth. Use the citation templates so give a better guide to what should be included. It will not reach GA like this. Technically, the first ref (and IMDb, for that matter) isn't a reliable source, but the lack of anything better (i.e. a source that knows that the past tense of 'broadcast' is 'broadcast', and not 'broadcasted') might mean you can get away with it. The JPStalk to me 17:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the tip! Cheers, CP 17:48, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article assessment

message: Sounds like a cool episode, i'll look it up. Anyway:
:GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#It is stable.
#:No edit wars etc.: 
#It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
#:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
#Overall: 
#:Pass/Fail: 
Major problem, the first and most important reference is dead (). Maybe there's a copy of whatever was there, somewhere. So i'll put this on hold for a week, if you address this sooner just contact me and i'll pass the article.
On a side note: A third concern was that the entire punchline of the episode, that the length of Al's performance prevented the Bundys from claiming any money, was considered an unacceptable revelation for the airwaves, i would put what's in italics on () so as to eliminate the second that and avoid repetition. Yamanbaiia 21:56, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, holy crap! After 10 years, why did Bundyology have to disappear now??? I will try and see if there's another source... Cheers, CP 21:59, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've replaced the URL with a copy at the Wayback Machine. Hopefully this is acceptable. The JPStalk to me 22:09, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, you beat me to it by like two minutes! But yes, thank you.... luckily it was in the archives! Cheers, CP 22:11, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I read the reference, everything's there. GA status obtained! Nice (and fast) work! Yamanbaiia 22:25, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the review! Cheers, CP 00:05, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA review 

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, MASEM 22:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps (Pass)