lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Anime Mid-Atlantic

message: Reduced to stub-class. If it's a stub, it can't be start-class. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 06:31, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: I noticed on the Administrator' noticeboard that there is a dispute about the attendance figures. It appears that there are actually two figures for total attendance: one figure for paid attendees, and the other figure for "warm" bodies (i.e. those who didn't pay, but managed to get in). 
I do think that it's a little misleading to have an attendance figure without at least explaining that there are two sets of attendance counts. Could we not list both in the table, with an explanation of what both the figures mean? - Letsbefiends (talk) 04:17, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Usually this isn't done, some larger articles such as Otakon and Anime Expo are the few that do something similar, but it could be done with some sort of note tag or marking them in parentheses. You might have misunderstood the original dispute, it was the attendance numbers were un-sourced and couldn't be verified, were being edited, threats were made, leading to the conflict. Ironically Animecons.com which is considered an Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Online reliable sources has been updated with attendance numbers, but with the table deleted (Which I don’t agree with) I’m not sure this is going to happen. Esw01407 (talk) 00:09, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Attendance figures

message: The problem I see with this article is Animecons.com which is a user submitted info site and therefore unreliable. To add the Event history the guests need to have an additional source for them such as ANN which I did see info there. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:52, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Animecons.com
Talk:Anime NebrasKon

message: I put the "histinfo" tag back.  If Anime NebrasKon is notable and worthy of a Wikipedia article, there should be at least some notable history to mention here other than just listing off the con dates and guests.  Aren't there any con reports out there that can be cited for reference as to what went on each year?  --PatrickD 05:38, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Possible source  AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 16:03, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs History
Talk:Anime Web Turnpike

message: When was Anipike first launched? I'm aware of the site's existence since 1995. However, I cannot quote myself on that. KyuuA4 16:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Answered: Old Anipike. KyuuA4 16:35, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Site Launch Date
Talk:Anime Weekend Atlanta

message: Okay, the article was tagged to have some historical review or something. Even after reading the wiki on the tag, i don't have a clear idea what they think should be added to the article...RCHM 21:11, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: History of the convention, perhaps even year-by-year, would be good.  Check Anime Boston for an example.  By the way, sign your Talk page posts using four ~ marks.  --PatrickD 18:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: oops, thought i did.  After looking at that AB article, it seems kind of excessive in details for the purpose of identifying the convention in an encyclopedic fashion. I would think it should be kept to the more momentus events to keep from getting verbose.RCHM 21:11, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical tag 

message: AWA is working on an official history would could be cited.  Obviously we are a little busy at the moment. Patrick AWA 15:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: well, since none has appeared since this comment was left, it seems Farix decided to remove what I threw in there.RCHM (talk) 18:25, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I challenged the content of the section under Wikipedia's guidelines on verifiability, but no published sources where ever provided. Just because it came from someone claiming to be a staffer doesn't mean that the information they add is verifiable. --Farix (Talk) 00:22, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  There's no official history to cite 

message: AWA makes it a big point to only cite 'paid' attendance figures, not full headcounts with staff and guests and whatnot.
I'd like to know where Farix is citing these figures from.RCHM (talk) 18:27, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Check the sources (AnimeCons.com) that are already being used for citation. These figures usually come directly from the con staff or from staff postings on the convention's forums. Otherwise, Patrick wouldn't put them up there. --Farix (Talk) 00:18, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attendance Figures? 

message: This Article references an unofficial Anime convention. Unofficial Anime Conventions (Not to mention Doushinjii sale areas) aren't part of Notability, so this should be deleted. Unless it ACTUALLY states that an Anime company funds the convention (having a representative at it for seminars doesn't count), it's not notable, so this article needs to be deleted. I mean, if the whole "Misty Con" thing can't be mentioned in the Misty article due to it being an "unofficial doushinjii corner/convention", then the Anime Weekend Atlanta thing should NOT be an article. Weedle_McHairybug.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.32.128.224 (talk) 23:14, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Article breaks Notability.
Talk:Anime licensing

message: This article can be expandable by explaining the anime licensing process - without regards to editing for the American market. KyuuA4 19:51, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: AnimeSuki Maintains a Region 1 Anime Licencing Database, we may want to make mention of that either in text or in an external links section. ReAn1985 (talk) 09:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expandable 

message: I am pro merging this article using there is sufficient information to prove to distinguish it it should be merged.
Dwanyewest (talk) 16:55, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Animethon

message: All the historic information REALLY needs to be organized into a history section, with a little expansion, and then the inclusion of more sections. Kopf1988 05:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please organize Historic Information 

message: I have marked two statements in the history section as dubious as they are not supported by the third-party referenced used elsewhere. --Farix (Talk) 13:43, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious information 

message: The article states both, and can't make up it's mind? Which is correct?
Funkfrost (talk) 22:22, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted it back to the October 25, 2008 version, which is the last good version with sources. Apparently an IP account removed all of the original content, include the few sources the article had, with except the event table. I'll be updating the event table shortly. --Farix (Talk) 22:47, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First held '94, or '93?
Talk:Aria The ANIMATION

message: This article is not necessary, all info (and more) is present in the Aria (manga) article. 
Any objections on deleting this article? Ninja neko 21:45, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This wasn't a merger, but I've no objections to the current redirection. Ninja neko 09:48, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed deletion
Talk:Grasshopper (band)

message: Which one of the members is the one with six fingers in one of his hands? Monni 07:46, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Six fingers 
Talk:Rhyl F.C.

message: The main body of the article says their ground holds 4000 but the infobox says 3000 - which is right? ChrisTheDude 07:50, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 4000, with 1700 seated according to the club website. -- Arwel (talk) 08:57, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers for that, the random firewall here at my office blocks sports sites so I couldn't check..... ChrisTheDude 09:00, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Quentin X, why did you undo the revision about Former Players? Blogdroed 21:23, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former Players edit 

message: What do we do about the new phoenix club?  Given that Rhyl FC has now folded and CPD Y Rhyl 1879 has been formed, I feel at the very least a new article (CPD Y Rhyl 1879) should be created, but beyond that is where it gets tricky. Should the new phoenix club be treated as a separate entity (thus a separate Wiki article entirely) or a mere continuation of the old club, in which case it would be more suitable to redirect this entire article to the new title and continue to add onto that as time goes on? Thoughts would be greatly appreciated. 2.25.38.41 (talk) 23:03, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect/ new article?
Talk:Mitsubishi B5M

message: data for the first version was from 
*http://www.csd.uwo.ca/~pettypi/elevon/gustin_military/db/jap/B5MMITSU.html
*http://avia.russian.ee/air/japan/mitsubishi_b5m.html
-Mak Thorpe 07:52, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:BBVA USA

message: I have removed the text regarding unsourced allegations against Compass banking practices, posted by an anonymous editor. These would not be allowed in the main article, and I feel that their inclusion here was merely a way to get around WP policy that would not allow such unsourced allegations in the main article. If an editor can provide sources to back up these allegations, post them and we'll see if they merit inclusion in the main article. (Full disclosure: I am a Compass Bank customer.) Realkyhick 23:28, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced charges
Talk:B-Daman

message: Now I'll admit I'm a little stoned right now, but when I found this page I didn't understand a word of it.
I think it needs a touch up.
*Done. Though I think it still needs a little work. Brittany Ka 14:38, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trippy 

message: "In 2005, Hasbro licensed the "Battle B-Daman" configuration of the toy. In 2004, Hasbro joined forces with Takara and Fox Entertainment Group to bring it to the Japan and USA. In 2005, Takara licensed the show to Fox Entertainment Group."
Is there a typo here? It doesn't really seem right to go 2005-2004-2005.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.237.156.172 (talk) 01:04, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a mistake?
Talk:Baby Felix

message: I saw a video for the end credits of this anime's English dub and none of the actors mentioned on this article were credited. Ian Fairchild (talk) 07:57, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Source for Voice Actors?

message: The article says that there's a DVD set with 9 discs published in Bulgaria, but my question is, where is the cite, where is the proof? 
I've searched for hours and i couldn't find a Bulgarian DVD set with nine discs.
187.144.182.157 (talk) 00:19, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bulgarian DVD set?
Talk:Baby & Me

message: Alright, I know that people don't really care about anime or manga in America, but that doesn't mean you can just go around and put spoilers for series like this without spoiler warnings! It's annoying, and it's spoiled 3 or 4 series that I might have wanted to watch. Stupid editors! 68.255.62.252 (talk) 21:10, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not only the story's plots and details, but the stable, clean drawings is also one of the attractive points.
I think there is some bias here. Otherwise, remove it or make a citation :/. --Qusai Al Shidi (AquaFox) 18:58, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *ANN: anime review
*ANN: GN 14
*EX Online: anime review
*Sequential Tart: vol.1
*CBB: Shojo Beat review
*Active Anime: vol.4
*Mania: Shoho Beat #1
*Comics Worth Reading: vol.1 and 2
--Gabriel Yuji (talk) 18:48, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Reviews
Talk:Baoh

message: ANN Jason Thompson --KrebMarkt (talk) 14:50, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s) 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Boah. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 13#Boah until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Boah" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Beauty is the Beast

message: Removed the following section:
Tomo Matsumoto was born on January 8th in Osaka and made the switch from nurse to mangaka with her debut story Nemuru Hime (Sleeping Princess) in Lunatic LaLa magazine in 1995. Her other works include Kiss, a series about piano lessons and love, 23:00, a book about street dancing, and Eikaiwa School Wars (English School Wars), which is currently serialized in Monthly LaLa magazine. Ms. Matsumoto loves dancing and taking English lessons.
This info should be put on Tomo's page. But it needs to be rewritten since it's a direct copy from the Shoujobeat site (I think copying text from websites wasn't allowed, but I'm not sure) Ninja neko 19:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed mangaka info 

message: Okay, I never objected against a deletion, but I'll try to make my reasons clear here.
The reasons this article (well, stub) was nominated:
# Non-notable
# WP not a directory
# A collection of plot and character summaries
# No real-world significance + no references
# An advert
My reasons to remove the nomination:
# How do you decide whether or not a certain manga is notable? It was notable enough (in it's own genre) to be picked up by a foreign publisher. I believe it is (or was) even a goal of the wikiproject manga to get all licensed manga's their own article.
# I'm not sure if argument applies to this article/stub
# This article/stub is written following the guidelines of the Wikiproject anime and manga. They actually advice a plot summary and character listings.
# Again, same deal as with point 1.
# True, the style of this article is written as an advert. Especially the summary, which was taken from the publisher's site. I'll remove that one per WP:CP
Also note that this article is a stub (as indicated with the template at the bottom). So it is far from complete yet, and much approval is needed.
Concerning the notability of a manga, I'd like to discuss this on the wikiproject anime & manga's talk page. I'd like to know what is considered notable manga by the other project members.
If it's decided that this manga is not notable, it can be put back up for deletion.
Ninja neko 18:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion 

message: Manga Life v.1 review
--Gabriel Yuji (talk) 20:57, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 
Talk:Bee Train Production

message: What do you think of creating a template like this for the series and OVAs created by Bee Train? There are enough articles to even put them all into a decent category. --Koveras  08:55, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template 

message: I still believe that adding "genre=various" to the infobox doesn't significantly contribute to the article. ^^ Because, frankly, it's redundant in the context: if the company doesn't limit itself to specific genres, this field can be just as well left empty. Also, we need a citation for the revenue figures... In fact, 10 million yen is mentioned on the official page but not as revenue but as capital stock (資本金). --Koveras ☭ 09:36, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genres and revenue 

message: They haven't made an anime in four years.
Update: This is now more than ten years. The studio may still exist as a formal entity but they're clearly not serving as an anime studio any more.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.35.98.156 (talk) 02:29, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Bee Train still active?
Talk:HMS Sheffield (D80)

message: An attempt to get a bit more structure into the article to make it an easier read. Still needs work though... - Snori (talk) 04:52, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: New sections

message: I was planning to add but having problems with the tool to convert to a reference.  Save for later or for any kind soul to do in the mean time. WCMemail 10:54, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: But it doesn't mention Sheffield explicitly. Maybe better to put this with this reference into the main Falkland War article? --Ozzy (talk) 12:23, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cite for synthetic clothing in uniforms 

message: I vaguely remember reading that one of the problems experienced by the Sheffield was that its missile-defense systems had been programmed to ignore friendly missiles, and the Exocet, being French, was seen as "friendly" (thanks to the expected response to a Soviet attack) and not dangerous.  Am I wrong in that? --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 14:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it is nonsense, the ESM system on Sheffield, had it not been transmitting on SATCOM would have classified the Exocet as a threat. WCMemail 14:55, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  False-friendly fire?
Talk:Gabriel Bonnot de Mably

message: Does anyone have a view on moving this article to Gabriel Bonnot de Mably since this seems to be the more commonly-used spelling in English and the spelling used in French academic library catalogs? See also: --HJMG 08:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bonnet or Bonnot
Talk:Birth (1984 film)

message: Maybe I'm just not all that familiar with how anime are listed on Wikipedia, but shouldn't this article be merged with The World of the Talisman?  It seems redundant to have two separate articles.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.254.118.192 (talk) 16:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 06:26, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 April 2021
Talk:Black Heaven

message: *EX review
*ANN commentaries
*ANN: introduction
*THEM Anime Reviews
*Sex and the Single Anime Hero
*Mania.com: vol. 1, , , 
--Gabriel Yuji (talk) 16:55, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs dump 
Talk:Brittle Bullet

message: I changed the caption on this (and most other episode) templates to an actual quote from the episode. As clever as we can be making up captions for the pictures, quotes from the show emphasize the themes more. --Gunblade (dicemus) 17:45, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caption Change 

message: I say that the following section should be removed:
*There are numerous innuendos in this episode that are notable by freeze-frame action only: 
**Toward the beginning of the episode, Nandaba Kamon walks in on Naota and Haruko kissing (while Haruko's rear-end is clearly shown, showing she doesn't wear underwear) and his face begins to turn several different shades of color. He finally screams at the top of his lungs, and if the animation is paused, a small demonic / mischievous character can be seen darting around in the back molars of his mouth. 
**A small face can be seen inside Kitsurubami's mouth as she screams. This is assumed to be her tongue, but viewers tend to second guess themselves when they realize this "tongue" is also toting guns in its hands just like Kitsurubami is doing. Also, moments before this part when she first screams, if you do slow motion her breast falls out and reveals her nipple(12:31) 
**With a smile on her face, Kitsurubami kicks Amarao in the back of the head with her bare foot towards the end of the episode. (19:54) 
**During this episode, Kamon and Kitsurubami are seen thrashing about in the river. When this scene is put in slow-motion, it is obvious that Kitsurubami is actually pressing her exposed rear-end against Kamon with apparent pleasure. 
1) How are any of these innuendos?
2) What is the purpose of this section?
It seems someone with a ton of time on (I presume) his hands decided to slow down the DVD for masturbatory reasons, because I see no reason for any of this information.
:I would think the innuendo that last represents to be quite obvious. I mean, come on: a female pressing her exposed rear-end against Kamon? How is that not innuendo for sex? -- Gwern  (contribs) 15:31, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hahahaha, oh I think I just busted my gut whil reading the preceeding comment.--Surfaced 20:35, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, but Amarao getting kicked in the face isn't an innuendo, and neither are the mysterious figures randomly in people's mouths.  The section says "There are numerous innuendos in this episode."  It should say easter eggs or something like that instead of innuendos, because not all the examples it lists are innuendos.  Also, some of it isn't worded very encyclopedia-like. (ex.:"if you do slow motion") --(anonymous and proud)72.161.132.212 22:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal?
Talk:Bubblegum Crash

message: The merge suggestion tag was placed a while ago, but nobody startd the voting thread on the Discussion page.
So, what are your votes on merging the BGCrash article into BGCrisis one? --The Fifth Horseman 15:34, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Support: Additional content can be added to justify existence as a separate article.  Primarily though, both BGC and BGC Crash are known as 2 separate series.  --BrokenSphere 17:12, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Crash and the Crisis OVA are set in the same continuity and should be covered together, given the fact Crash was a byproduct of the fallout between the producers and the creators. And on the "slowly accumulate information over time"... the Crash article has been here for almost 4 years and still has nothing to show for it. It doesn't get any slower than that.--Nohansen 20:08, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge voting
Talk:Buddha (manga)

message: *ANN: Jason Thompson
--KrebMarkt (talk) 20:59, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s) 

message: The page is well organized and presents the information is a clear manner. However, I do believe separating characters or letting the reader know which character and plot belongs to which volume of the manga, would be helpful. The article has external links and references, so the reader is able to see where the author got their information.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ihechi.Ez (talk • contribs) 18:26, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, thanks for the feedback. The volume they belong to is noted for a majority of the characters in the characters section. is that what you meant or are you asking that it be consistent and note the appearing volume for all of them? As for the individual plots, the plot section is meant to give an overview of the plot. Individual volume summaries can be added to a volume list, although the 14 Japanese volumes vs the 8 international might be a point of contention/confusion. Opencooper (talk) 18:39, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addtions to Buddha 

message: First volume cover, please.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.80.247.35 (talk) 14:49, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request.
Talk:Bumpety Boo

message: Wait a mintue! Bumpity Boo was a girl?  I had a tape of it and I could have sworn the car didn't sound like a girl at all!  All these years of disillusionment! ;P--TEAKAY-C II R (talk) 03:36, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are people who think Jeremy Fredrick Wilson is a girl too, but that's neither here nor there. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 01:19, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

text: It's without a doubt a "he-car". The official English Nippon Animation website states "Bumboo is a very strange car-like creature with a cute yellow body.He was born from a mysterious egg at an automobile factory. [...]", in one episode Bumboo meets a "she-car" with a ribbon, this German partly English mixed (German: "denglisch") episode guide refers to Bumpety Boo as a "er" (he) and there were no mentioned citations. Though, it might be possible that his gender got changed in an (most likely lousy and awful) English dub and it wouldn't be the first time that such a thing happened. -93.196.238.204 (talk) 22:53, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bumpety Boo Gender issue 