lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Latch-up

message: Is "LPC circuit" a case of RAS syndrome, inconsistent with its apparent definition ("Latchup Protection Technology circuit"), or just a typo? - 24.10.140.179 04:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: LPC circuit question

message: Hey, this article comes mainly from the analog devices page. Probably should cite that as a source just in case they change the page, or just in case. 71.206.12.121 (talk) 15:53, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: From the analog devices page

message: Currently this "latch-up" page discusses two kinds of problems:
* One problem is relatively temporary:
the article says
"A power cycle is required to correct this situation."
* The other problem is permanent:
the article says
"... resulting in destruction of the chip".
My understanding is that:
* Early CMOS processes had the "destruction" problem.
* Many (most?) modern CMOS processes are specifically designed to be immune to the "destruction" problem, but latchup can still occur and requires power-cycle to clear.
* A few modern CMOS processes (silicon-on insulator, etc.) are completely immune to any kind of latchup.
Is there a common word or phrase to distinguish between (a) devices that, after a power-cycle, are as good as new, vs. (b) devices that are permanently damaged and will never again work correctly, no matter how many times they are power-cycled?
--DavidCary (talk) 01:39, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  two kinds of problems
Talk:List of Bengali authors

message: This content should be merged with List of Bengali language authors. Rumpelstiltskin223 04:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Manually maintaining an alphabetic list of Bengali language authors is unnecessary because the same is "automatically" being done in :Category:Bengali writers. What we need is a chronological list of Bengali language authors (I'm saying Bengali language author not Bengali author - because we need the list to include writers from all nationality and ethnic background). Manually updating such a list is worth the effort because it gives additional insight into the history of "Bengali Literature". This practice is similar with other major language literature - see List of French language authors.
So, I have created the other list - List of Bengali language authors, and working to gradually move all authors from this page to the new  chronological page. Please help me in this task. Once this task is complete we should delete this page. - Arman Aziz 05:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Desire (1936 film)

message: Apparently there were songs. Could we have details? Valetude (talk) 23:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Songs?
Talk:Garfield, New Jersey

message: I found an error in the Transportation section in the article. It said that Plauderville station was in Garfield, but Plauderville station is really in Saddle Brook, so therefore I fixed it. I also added facts about road and bus transportation as well. NHRHS2010 Talk  12:50, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transportation 
Talk:Anna D. Shapiro

message: Started by In Defense of the Artist. Contact him to discuss it. Tyrenius 05:05, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article start
Talk:Progressive Broadcasting System

message: So, I did a Google image search, and came across this website featuring the "PBS" logo for Progressive: FADED SIGNALS: Progressive Broadcasting System wanted to compete...
Not really sure how to go about setting up the image to be used for the article... ClarkKentWannabe (talk) 07:05, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Found the logo for Progressive Broadcasting System
Talk:Al-Qaeda's New Front

message: This article is about a non-notable documentary.  It should be nominated for AfD.  --64.230.126.5 05:12, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:96P/Machholz

message: The reference no 2. in the text makes reference to the perihelion of 2012. But the source of the reference stipulates that this date is the re-appearance of the comet. Not precisely the perihelion. For the same reason I believe that the reference to the perihelion of Oct 27 2017 are not correct. Capbat (talk) 02:20, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Those are the perihelion dates. The green dot just means the comet was observed during that passage. The Minor Planet Center clearly shows perihelion to be 2017-10-27.9 . -- Kheider (talk) 13:22, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference question
Talk:Harold Howard

message: So someone keeps on posting a Randleman documentary, claiming that Howard molested him as a child.  Maybe this is true, maybe this isn't.  I don't know -- nor do I claim to.  However, per guidelines ofWikipedia:Biographies of living persons:
: Editors should remove any contentious material about living persons that is unsourced, relies upon sources that do not meet standards specified in Wikipedia:Verifiability, or is a conjectural interpretation of a source (see Wikipedia:No original research). If the material is derogatory and unsourced or poorly sourced, the three-revert rule does not apply to its removal. Content may be re-inserted when it conforms to this policy.
If a reliable source can be quoted and cited for this statement, it can (and should) go back in.  But only until citation can be added! Djma12 (talk) 23:11, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added again by an IP rolled back & warned. --Nate1481( t/c) 10:11, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Molestationg Accusation 

message: Posted by a user  here --Mista-X (talk) 05:15, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: YouTube videos 

message: If anyone is interested in improving or expanding the article, Sherdog just published a pretty good article on him: "Harold Howard: Where Is He Now?". --aktsu (t / c) 16:20, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article on Sherdog 

message: Why was this removed from his record? I don't care if Sherdog altered their database recently, that win is on TAPE and is a fact. It should be listed in his record. Royce quit the fight, Howard won. Hexrei2 (talk) 23:43, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. A "towel throw in" was one of the ways to lose a match. It should not be considered a bye since he came to the ring with his team.   GEOFF  ✉  03:23, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

text: The Gracie revisionist mafia is hilarious. They have also completely erased the death of Ryan Gracie from his Wiki page.  GEOFF  ✉  03:31, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Howard's win over Royce
Talk:98 Aquarii

message: @Lithopsian: According to given reference the R☉ is 27.4 for 98 Aqr. According to the star box it is 14 R☉. Can you straighten that out!? Deryni (talk) 15:38, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Twice the radius is 27.4.  Hence the radius is 13.7.  Rounding gives 14.  Not very clear.  Lithopsian (talk) 15:49, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I saw later, R*2, on the line above. Thanks! Deryni (talk) 17:08, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radius
Talk:9885 Linux

message: Extraordinary that this article is allowed to survive but Linux (washing powder) was deleted as not being notable.  Only a crowd of geeks (Hey, I'm one too!) could think that a chunk of rock in outer space is more notable than that which is used by 1000's to wash their clothes every week.  Paul Beardsell (talk) 12:39, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:FORUM. if the washing powder is so notable, take it to WP:DRV. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 13:40, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, I'm just making an observation.  Not thru my telescope but down at the shops.  Paul Beardsell (talk) 14:00, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  On notability 

message: This article was redirected to the List of minor planets in June 2016. Rfassbind – talk  10:43, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:A Carinae

message: I think that the merged article should end up at V415 Carinae not at A Carinae. For a start, SIMBAD does not list the "A Carinae" designation for this object . Secondly the designation "a Carinae" refers to a different star (V357 Carinae, SIMBAD page here). Given we can't have separate pages titled a Carinae and A Carinae, it might be better to have A Carinae as a disambiguation page. Icalanise (talk) 16:46, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The page has been merged to the V based name. 70.29.213.241 (talk) 09:05, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger
Talk:Abell 2029

message: The article (like the Chandra web page it cites) says the object is in Serpens, but the coordinates are clearly in Virgo. Simbad gives a slightly different position, but also on the Virgo side of the official constellation boundary. Odysseus1479 (talk) 07:02, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought the Chandra page does say Virgo, not Serpens ?? -- œ™ 01:56, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It sure does—now. Odysseus1479 (talk) 02:57, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hehe, Harvard should be so fortunate to have Wikipedians checking their facts for them.. -- œ™ 03:15, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Abell 2029

message: "315 megaparsecs (1.027 billion light years) away" away from what? --Sandsandsandsa (talk) 14:29, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Away from what?
Talk:Abell 2218

message: Later discovered galaxies have claimed the title of most distant known, with lower redshifts than the one claimed for this set of lensed galaxies. Particularly, IOK-1 was commonly accepted to be the most distant, and it had a lower redshift and later discovery than the galaxy stated in this article. 
This appears to be using out of date science, as later discoveries would not claim the record as they did not exceed the claim here, but alas, they do. This seems to be similar to the case of Abell 1835 IR1916, which claims a redshift of 10, and was discredited.
76.66.198.128 (talk) 05:07, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: lensed galaxies as then most distant known galaxies
Talk:Francis Greenslade

message: francis greenslade reads his own discussion page  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.188.209.6 (talk) 12:26, August 22, 2007 (UTC) 
: he no lie he no lie he no lie greenslade  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.149.24.120 (talk) 12:23, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Old Maid (1939 film)

message: The plot of the Old Maid is remarkably similar to the plot of Edith Wharton's 1925 novel, The Mother's Recompense, but the article makes no note of this.,  —Preceding unsigned comment added by GJR (talk • contribs) 04:20, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Provenance of the Plot of ''The Old Maid''
Talk:AG Carinae

message: Looking at the SIMBAD entry for the star, I noticed a note about it being misclassified as a PN. The abstract for the Hubble observation of the object calls it a circumstellar shellhttp://archive.stsci.edu/proposal_search.php?mission=hst&id=5149. I didn't know if I should change it because I am not an astronomer and easily confused by these things. I do read a bit about these things when I process the images, though.
Geckzilla (talk) 21:59, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOT a Planetary Nebula 

message: Recent coverage of the Hubble Observatory's picture of the star (e.g. SciTechDaily) talks about "One or more giant eruptions 10,000 years ago created the beautiful, expanding shell of dust and gas seen here." Hold on, if it's 20,000 light years away, then we can't see this she'll, the light hasn't arrived yet!?
This Wikipedia article similarly says "The nebula contains around 15 M☉, all lost from the star around 10,000 years ago." Are we going to see this nebula when the light arrives at Earth in another 10,000 years, or did it happen 10,000 years before the photons showing the ring that we currently see on Earth were emitted?
Maybe relative time is handled a certain way in astronomical discussions, and this is just the first time I've noticed the issue with "NNNNN years ago"? -- Skierpage (talk) 06:14, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  10,000 years ago or 20,000 light years away? 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:A magnificent view of AG Carinae.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for October 11, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-10-11. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 19:47, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Carl Sciortino

message: This fact is worthy of note - once. After that, it becomes superfluous, and in some ways, it can be considered inflammatory (why mention it over and over?). I'm trying real hard not to sound political, but at some point this should be immaterial to a discussion about a public figure. I won't make edits at this time; I'm hoping others will see what I'm talking about and then clean up the article. (talk) 14:59, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Openly Gay - We get it, move on
Talk:Alpha Arae

message: I just read it may rotate faster than a million miles per hour (http://stardate.org/feeds/radio/2007-01-25/) -68.190.167.121 05:22, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops!  The article states 470KM/Sec...  That is ~a million MPH.  Sorry about that 68.190.167.121 05:25, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates 
Talk:Alpha Camelopardalis

message: The opening paragraph describes this star as the most distant constellational star.  Does this mean the most remote star with a Bayer designation?  If so, it would be clearer to say that. 165.120.111.22 (talk) 21:23, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 
Talk:Bello, Antioquia

message: THIS ARTICLE IS SUB-FEATURED IN SPANISH.
Hiperion93 (talk) 15:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Martin Thornton

message: I have looked everywhere I can think of - on the web and in encyclopaediae - to find a detailed biography of Martin Thornton, and have come up completely blank.  As well, I own several of his books, but they are extremely sketchy in personal details, so I have put out this stub in the hope of stimulating a little collective research about a remarkable person.
Susan Fiore, on Amazon.com, writes this review of A Joyful Heart which beautifully captures Thornton's spirit:
A Joyful Heart is subtitled Meditations for Lent, but far from being somber, it's pure fun. Martin Thornton addresses the serious issues of being Christian by looking at some surprising things: woodlice, a girl who comes to mass in Truro Cathedral in a bikini. And he has a surprising take on these, expressed with a wonderful sense of humor. Do your heart good and read this slim volume.
Tony Harwood-Jones 05:34, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alpha Cygni variable

message: And they "exhibit non-radial pulsations"?? What? ... said: Rursus (mbork³) 11:45, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mega-huh??!!

message: ,  Given these are some kickass big stars...is it worthwhile putting luminosity as a column on this table? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:28, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Well they're all (more or less) supergiants.  The luminosities don't cover a huge range though, although larger if you include some of the LBVs and hypergiants which can show a sort of exaggerated α Cyg variation. Lithopsian (talk) 22:27, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luminosity 

message: This reference has a list:
http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?1998A%26A...330..215W&db_key=AST&nosetcookie=1
Lithopsian (talk) 13:45, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Helpful Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:36, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

text: Adjusted both articles to have referenced variable star status. Lithopsian (talk) 23:46, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: begs the question what some of these things actually are...Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:02, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I think they're actually giant aliens shooting laser beams at us :) StringTheory11 (t • c) 16:11, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

text: Zeta Puppis is listed as a suspected Alpha Cygni variable.  It wouldn't be a typical one, but I added it to the category. Lithopsian (talk) 16:39, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  List 

message: The period of bet Ori and eps Ori are identical in the table. This is either an amazing coincidence or a transcription error. Someone should check it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:6AF0:C90:586E:2A2E:60DB:79C2 (talk) 17:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Only equal to four decimal places!  I can't find supports for this period for either star in any of the given references, or anywhere else for that matter.  I deleted them both.  Lithopsian (talk) 19:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious periods
Talk:Alpha Gruis

message: Since the star is given the name Al-Nair, why not rename the article Al-Nair instead of using it's Bayer Designation? Other articles for stars such as Arcturus (Alpha Boötis) and Betelgeuse (Alpha Orionis) also uses their given names instead of Bayer Designations. --Pavithran (talk) 14:54, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:COMMONNAME.  My mother could tell you that Betelgeuse and Arcturus are stars, but nobody outside of the IAU star naming committee has ever heard of Al-Nair.  Lithopsian (talk) 19:32, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename The Article
Talk:Jason Clarke

message: The article says he was born and grew up in Australia, where he also had a long early career, and that he is married to a Frenchwoman. No comment about his living in the US or holding US citizenship, but states he "identifies as Democrat." Is this statement backed up with any evidence or source?BillDeeUS (talk) 01:10, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identifies as Democrat
Talk:Alpha Horologii

message: Can someone please convert the coordinates into the standard tripartite notation of hours-minutes-second of right ascension and degrees-arcminutes-arcseconds of declination?  I would convert it myself except I have never seen the notation used here before (and there is no citation provided for reference).  The only mentions I could find on Wikipedia are obscure references to 17th and 18th century notations using "' (triple prime) as 1/60 of an arcsecond and a "tierce" for 1/60 of a second.  It may be that whoever put in the coordinates was using a very old reference perhaps, but I do not know if it is a sexagesimal subunit, decimal, or other.  Nicole21532 (talk) 05:21, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been addressed. Praemonitus (talk) 20:36, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  coordinates
Talk:Clodovil Hernandes

message: Interesting guy, too bad there aren't more sources and a better summary of his importance.  The copyediting is done, however.Levalley (talk) 01:41, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: General Comments
Talk:Poison Ivy (1992 film)

message: The sentence "While sitting in the office for phoning in a bomb threat to a local TV station (that her father works for) she sees Ivy walk in and begins to talk to her." in the plot summary section is unclear and should be rewritten: Who is sitting in the office? Is she sitting in the office because she phoned for a bomb threat, or is she sitting in the office to phone for a bomb threat? What bomb threat? 24.48.118.118 (talk) 14:48, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support. The reasoning is fine. Uhlan talk  06:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Alpha Ophiuchi

message: I came here searching Rasalhague, I don't think 'Alpha Ophiuchi' is exactly going to take off amongst the common people. Is there an amazingly important reason it was renamed? Or will continuing to use it's original name still be fine? --121.210.33.50 (talk) 03:37, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The IAU regards 'Alpha Ophiuci' as a catalog designation rather than a name, though Bayer designations have been around so long people have tended to think of them as names. It was known as Rasalhague well before Bayer created his catalog, the IAU just formalised that. Alpha Ophiuchi is more commonly used, especially by astronomers both amateur and professional (hence the article title) and thus book and science writers. Possibly because it's more informative than the name - the designation tells you it's the brightest star in Ophiuchus. As with all catalog designations and approved names, the IAU has no objection to either. Cuddlyopedia (talk) 15:07, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was it renamed?
Talk:Buenaventura, Valle del Cauca

message: I'm not sure that describing Buenaventura as "the size of Los Angeles' metropolitan area" helps anyone but the relatively small amount of people familiar with that city. Wouldn't it be better to refer to something more objective?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.110.7.26 (talk) 16:16, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indication of size
Talk:Alpha Pictoris

message: بفلالیلل
بیب
لیع 37.98.73.59 (talk) 17:51, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  بیاب
Talk:Alpha Serpentis

message: First paragraph states double star, but no companion is mentioned or described anywhere in the article or tables. 168.5.81.163 (talk) 20:23, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: End of the properties section.  Feel free to expand, with suitable references.  Lithopsian (talk) 20:56, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double star?