Talk:Joint Task Force 2

message: I have found no evidence that CBC reported the role of JTF-2 in Haiti on the February 29, 2004 kidnapping of Aristide. If someone has the source from CBC, they should include it as a footnote/reference. There's a good chance that I just simply haven't found it yet.
There is, however, a source in the Canadian Press wire service from March 5, 2004 that I will add.
Ageless 09:52, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The CBC link in the Haiti 2004 section 

message: This doesn't really pertain to the article, but is there another/previous JTF, thereby facilitating the 2 in JTF2?
This is from the official JTF-2 website. In Canadian military terminology "joint task force" refers to any force that is made up of two or more elements (land, air or sea) of the Canadian Forces (CF). Since JTF-2 includes personal from all three elements it is considered a joint task force. When JTF-2 was formed it was given the "2" designation because there is already a JTF-1 in use. There has been attempts recently to change the name for JTF-2, however, there is a lot of opposition to any name change. 
L.J. Brooks 18:41, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  JTF1? 

message: I'm in the process of re-doing the JTF-2 article. There is no an official JTF-2 webpage up and running and I'm using information extracted from it to update the page. When finished I will attempt to do the same for CANSOFCOM and CSOR. L.J. Brooks 18:41, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-editing of article 

message: As the section had no references, I removed the better part of the speculation on the new PlayStation 3 Game "SOCOM: Confrontation" as there has been no news of JTF2 being included. Though, they have been confirmed by some gaming engineers, the team compositions have not as yet been confirmed and thus have been removed.
Mcase07 22:31, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pop Culture 

message: Decided to remove Equipment and it's TO&E as most of the equipment was simply copied from the original Canadian Forces page. Also some of the equipment used is unconfirmed (I have yet to see or hear the use of the G36 and G3 by the CF, I understand that SF may purchase there own weapons but until I see declassified reports from DND concerning the procurement of foreign weapons I remove it) and others are simply absurd (JTF-2 using howitzers?) Come on even as a Soldier myself, I know for damn well sure that JTF2 does not have howitzers.   Pte. M. 12 November 2007. (1:25 p.m.)
- Good call. Whereas most military units would use artillery, a specialist unit such as JTF-2 DIRECTLY using artillery is not part of their operations manifest. As they are a direct action specialist team, they would likely call in fire for effect in any situation. 
In addition to this, in the FN P90 article, it states that it is currently in use with JTF-2. While I can see its ability and use in this unit, I cannot see anywhere or any confirmed source that states that it would be used by this unit. Can anyone confirm its use or at least the possession by the unit of this particular submachine gun. Mcase07 (talk) 05:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sidenote: I wanted to make note of the POSSIBILITY of JTF-2 using howitzers, regardless of the absurdity. Please note, at Firebase Cobra; a pure US Army SF base, they manned and continued bombardments round the clock from the operators themselves. So I do see it as a remote possibility. But unconfirmed. Perhaps it should state "...and the units operators have access to artillery should it be fit for the mission they are issued. Mcase07 (talk) 20:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the information on the purchase about 2.5 years ago from Edmonton Journal should be included. The news state that JTF#2 has purchased $17.8 Million worth of equipment mainly weapons. It mention the percurement of the FN Herstal's Project 90 (P90 5.7X28mm) On you tube there was an introduction about JTF2's requirement showing couple of pictures; guns I've see are MP5A2, MP5A3 (SEF trigger group), C7/C8 Series, an pump action shotgun looks similiar to Mossberg or M3 (Poor picture and lightning) Kullwarrior  —Preceding undated comment was added at 04:30, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Equipment 

message: Can we please include the 2004-2005 Christian Crisis to Unconfirmed Operations please? As I see it, there is zero proof our special operators nor any statements of record by any operators, politicians and/or military personnel that Canada had boots on ground in the purpose of Hostage Rescuse by JTF2. Rightfully, and seeing the cited document still does not give factual evidence or contributed statements DIRECTLY to JTF2. We can all wish and hope, but doesn't bring Santa down the Chimney. Mcase07 (talk) 20:37, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unconfirmed Action 

message: I was under the impression it was named "JTF2" as Joint Task Force was originally an RCMP unit, but decided to pass off the their responsibilities because the job of Joint Task Force was counterintuitive to the RCMP's mandate of preserving lives.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Richwhitfield (talk • contribs) 08:55, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  JTF2 

message: I recall there was a story awhile ago about a member of JTF2 that charged his sergeant with abuse.  However, because JTF2 members cannot be named, the hearing could not proceed as the defendant couldn't be named.  Does anyone have a link to that or know what happened afterwards?
129.97.20.203 (talk) 23:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  JTF2 misconduct allegations? 

message: This section definitely breaches WP:UNDUE, can somebody other than myself cut it down to an appropriate size? Sherurcij (speaker for the dead)  03:41, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Training and selection

message: I've just deleted the "Alleged war crimes" section, which appears to be a hold-over from some real-time reporting that was subsequently overtaken by events. Essentially, there was an accusation of war crimes by JTF2 members which triggered a parallel investigation about why it was not reported properly. The accusation was later set aside and the members involved found to have not done what they were accused of. The section in this article stated all this, but also stated that the unit was still under investigation for the failure to report the incident. Since there actually was no "incident", it follows that the investigation into the failure to report it has also been set aside. Consequently: no war crimes, no reporting failure, no need to have an "Alleged war crimes section". It maybe that someone sees some reason to record that JTF2 was falsely accused of committing a war crimes, but I'm not certain that falls within the notability guidelines. Is my interpretation wrong? Geoff NoNick (talk) 18:07, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alleged war crimes 

message: Joint Task Force 2 is not a branch of the Canadian Army. The Army is an environmental command and has no control whatsoever on JTF2's operations. The Land Staff (Army chain of command) is unrelated to the staff of CANSOFCOM. JTF2 recruits from all three environmental commands, including the Navy, by the way. Please restore the correct revision. (Same discussion at Talk:Canadian Special Operations Regiment) CharlieEchoTango 19:01, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is getting silly 

message: :"In his book Enduring the Freedom, Sean M. Maloney reported that during operations in Afghanistan, Canada's JTF2 was the only foreign unit accepted to join American Tier 1 special operations units, such as 1st SFOD-D (Delta Force) and DEVGRU" 
First this quote really needs a real citation. As for the dubious-ness it seems that this quote needs to come from someone with a NPOV, ie, someone not from JTF2. Are we to accept that a member of JTF2 was aware of all ops carried out by US SFOD-D/DEVGRU?
DouglasCalvert (talk) 06:14, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the claim over 2 years, without any ref added, as well I looked online and could not fine any other NPOV sources, but the book or copy's of this page. Kyle1278 01:30, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 

message: Several of the claims by this supposed former-JTF2 operator have already been debunked, and many others are doubtful to say the least.  Even the advertisements for it are preposterous, such as one French site which claimed that:
: "Unlike the British SAS and the United States’ Delta Force, this special Canadian intervention unit was, according to David Rudd of the Canadian Institute of Strategic Studies, trained 'to infiltrate into dangerous areas behind enemy lines, look for key targets and take them out. They don't go out to arrest people. They don't go out there to hand out food parcels. They go out to kill targets.'”  
Huh, I had no idea the SAS & Delta just went around arresting people and handing out food parcels.  Good thing we're allies with the real killers, JTF2.  (yes, that was sarcasm)  He even supposedly goes on to claim that 16 JTF2 operators neutralized 60 American Delta operators and Rangers in 12 seconds.  Remarkably, nobody could verify this claim, so I guess we'll just have to take his word for it.  (again, that was sarcasm)
http://www.jcl.qc.ca/detail_livre/nous-etions-invincibles/
http://circ.jmellon.com/docs/view.asp?id=1210
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2008/05/05/did_tellall_book_on_jtf2_make_it_all_up.html ForwardObserver85 (talk) 22:25, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Denis Morisset Claims

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Joint Task Force 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110706181701/http://www.journal.forces.gc.ca/engraph/Vol2/no1/pdf/11-20_e.pdf to http://www.journal.forces.gc.ca/engraph/vol2/no1/pdf/11-20_e.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:27, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Joint Task Force 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100926073614/http://www.cbc.ca:80/canada/ottawa/story/2006/03/23/ot-jtf2-rescue20060323.html to http://www.cbc.ca/canada/ottawa/story/2006/03/23/ot-jtf2-rescue20060323.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120927165500/http://www.thestar.com/News/article/164279 to http://www.thestar.com/News/article/164279
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090621192623/http://www.ctv.ca:80/servlet/ArticleNews/show/CTVShows/20080703/sam_braddock_david_paetkau to http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/show/CTVShows/20080703/sam_braddock_david_paetkau
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Joint Task Force 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090421212321/http://origin.www.cbc.ca/news/story/1999/04/20/canada_kos990420.html to http://origin.www.cbc.ca/news/story/1999/04/20/canada_kos990420.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:51, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Joint Task Force 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://origin.www.cbc.ca/news/story/1999/04/20/canada_kos990420.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:30, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Joint Task Force 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.jtf2.forces.gc.ca/index-eng.asp
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www4.carleton.ca/jmc/cnews/08032002/n1.shtml
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.jtf2.forces.gc.ca/ajt-sfo/fut-ave/index-eng.asp
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cbc.ca:80/canada/ottawa/story/2006/03/23/ot-jtf2-rescue20060323.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.journal.forces.gc.ca/engraph/Vol2/no1/pdf/11-20_e.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/1999/04/20/canada_kos990420.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Canadian+warship+route+JTF2+sent+Libya/4369428/story.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thestar.com/News/article/164279
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071019015251/http://www.espritdecorps.ca/don't%20just%20equipe%20the%20JTF2.htm to http://www.espritdecorps.ca/don't%20just%20equipe%20the%20JTF2.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.altair.com.pl/czasopisma-artykuly-439
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ctv.ca:80/servlet/ArticleNews/show/CTVShows/20080703/sam_braddock_david_paetkau
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Joint Task Force 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110102083839/http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=bbc102a1-5f63-4ea3-97ea-24cb916d8627&p=1 to http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=bbc102a1-5f63-4ea3-97ea-24cb916d8627&p=1
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Canadian+warship+route+JTF2+sent+Libya/4369428/story.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110102083839/http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=bbc102a1-5f63-4ea3-97ea-24cb916d8627&p=1 to http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=bbc102a1-5f63-4ea3-97ea-24cb916d8627&p=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:52, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:23, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: At 1:06:05 a discussion starts about how JTF 2 is broken down  []
Is this considered reliable enough as a source? Szeklertravel (talk) 17:33, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've already left a detailed response to your comment on your talk page, but in short, no... adding a timestamp does not suddenly make a youtube video reliable. I would suggest finding a better source. If you find a source you believe may be more reliable, you should post it here instead making another edit to again re-add that same content. Again, please read the comments on your page, and the links included in them, as they have the answers you seek and the guidelines you need to know. - wolf 00:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joint Task Force 2 structure according to former operator 

message: Regarding page numbers, is it okay to list pages of the chapter, when a chapter is mentionned, as for the whole chapter when the ref is used multiple times? Is there a way to cite pages for each uses of the same book ref?
I've added chaprer pages for a book ref since it was marked as missing by someone. I listed the whole chapter from the book available at archive.org to borrow.
https://archive.org/details/canadianspiesspi0000boer/page/124
Old💩404 (talk) 14:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book ref used multiple times, how to...