lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Roots blower

message: New York subway demonstration ThomasHarrisGrantsPass (talk) 16:23, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subway? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs (talk) 17:54, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Roots-type supercharger →  – Incorrect name.   Supercharging is only one application. This was moved years ago and any reasons for that were perhaps more obvious at the time. But it should also have been fixed years ago.   
Roots blower would be favoured over Roots-type blower, per COMMONNAME.
BTW, 'Rootes' is just wrong, even though the name has gone through that at one time. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:02, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 October 2023
Talk:Symonds Yat

message: According to this article, Symonds Yat (East) is in Gloucestershire: this is communicated through the words "Symonds Yat East is on the Gloucestershire side of the river" and with a Gloucestershire-based infobox.
But if you look at an Ordnance Survey map, or if you go on Street View (follow the road north from Symonds Yat rock), or if you go there in person, you find that the Herefordshire-Gloucestershire border in this area does not follow the river Wye, but cuts across the peninsula formed by the meander of the river.  According to the OS maps available, Symonds Yat Rock is in Gloucestershire, but the hamlet of Symonds Yat (East) - despite being on the "Gloucestershire side" of the river - is  actually on the Herefordshire side of the border in the parish of Goordrich.
The current infobox for Symonds Yat (East) seems to be correct - but only for the Rock, not for either hamlet.  I thus propose to change the Gloucestershire infobox to refer to Symonds Yat Rock, and the Herefordshire one to refer to either both Symonds Yat (West) and Symonds Yat (East), or simply to Symonds Yat.
A second thing, the OS spellings for the hamlets include the brackets in Symonds Yat (East) and Symonds Yat (West).  We should follow their convention. Kahastok talk 22:07, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Kahastok talk 10:34, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  County border 
Talk:Heathrow Airport

message: Hi all. Over two years ago I tried to move the Commons category for Heathrow from "London Heathrow Airport" to "Heathrow Airport", correcting an obvious error as the name of the airport is Heathrow Airport, not London Heathrow Airport. However, ss is often the case with the Commons, due to lower traffic levels, obvious mistakes do not get corrected and this discussion died down. Could some people from here perhaps go over and support with this move?
The discussion is here. 
Thanks Elshad (talk) 09:37, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Support needed at Wikimedia Commons 

message: Has anyone ever actually heard the first variant, with the main stress on the second syllable?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.149.241.58 (talk) 14:51, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: pronunciation (IPA)

message: At Heathrow Airport, most non-aligned airlines used Terminal 4 prior to the pandemic. Some non-aligned airlines did not use Terminal 4 included  Emirates, Eurowings, Icelandair, and Virgin Atlantic.  However, I didn't understand why Chinese new non-aligned airlines were assigned to other terminals. For Chinese carriers, I know Air China and Taiwan's EVA Air used Terminal 2 because they are Star Alliance members, Hong Kong's Cathay Pacific used Terminal 3 because it is a Oneworld member and China Eastern and China Southern used Terminal 4 because they are SkyTeam (China Southern quit in 2019). 
Between 2017-2018,  Beijing Capital Airlines, Hainan Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines and Tianjin Airlines began flights from China to London. However, Beijing Capital Airlines, Hainan Airlines and Tianjin Airlines was assigned to Terminal 3 and Shenzhen Airlines was assigned to Terminal 2 although having heard Tianjin Airlines was to use Terminal 2 due to its approximate distance with Beijing. China Southern Airlines left SkyTeam in 2019 but remained at Terminal 4 and it was the only Chinese non-aligned airline to use Terminal 4. 
What was the decision that Beijing Capital Airlines, Hainan Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines and Tianjin Airlines to use Terminal 3 and Terminal 2? Loveheart547 (talk) 23:00, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Your questions are probably best answered on forums like airliners.net or pprune.org instead of wikipedia Pmbma (talk) 23:32, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How did Heathrow assign Chinese airlines in 2017-2018? 

message: I have seen no evidence that British Airways does any flights to Casablanca. Should this be corrected or can anyone find evidence of this?
TTFTAKM (talk) 23:58, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casablanca BA route
Talk:Window class

message: * window class - the huge part of the article is used for the debate between wikipedians who claim the window class is OOP but those who disagree. Worse, the article has been used to justify class (object-oriented programming) is to distinguish from class (computer science). Also I don't see the reason to cover classes other than one in cs. In cs, classes almost always means classes in oop. The current situation is misleading, distracting and more importantly confusing and inconsisten with other cs related articles. -- Taku 01:08, Oct 25, 2003 (UTC)
**Revert, keep the reverted version. Please stop listing for deletion pages where you didn't prevail in or even engage in discussions with others. VfD isn't for circumventing consensus-forming. I expanded the description you had previosly deleted and have now deleted again to explain to you why you didn't prevail in the discussions on the other topics in their talk pages.JamesDay 02:45, 25 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: From [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion|VfD]]
Talk:Transitive property of equality

message: The problem with the specific example in the article is that the relationship between men and talking is different than between talking and stupid, and hence the transitive property doesn't hold. The relationship between men and talking is "do", or in more mathematical terms do(men, talking). The do relationship isn't even an equivalence relation, because do(men, talking) doesn't imply do(talking,men). The relationship between talking and stupid is "is", or is(talking, stupid), which also isn't an equivalence relationship, because is(talking,stupid) doesn't imply is(stupid,talking). 
In order to reach the conclusion that men are stupid you would have to have a relationship such as:
For all X where do(X,talking) then is(X,stupid)
or in plain English
Anyone who talks is stupid.
The problem is that it isn't an equivalence relation. Joshuajohanson (talk) 17:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with the linguistic example
Talk:Daniel Ellsberg

message: :These documents, completed in 1968, later became known collectively as the "Pentagon Papers" (named after the "Pumpkin Papers" of the Hiss-Chambers Case).[8]
I've been unable to find any evidence supporting the parenthetical assertion. Yes, both were leaks of secrets, and both came to be referred to as "Papers"—but that shared common English word is where the similarity seems to end. (The <ref> makes no reference to Pumpkin.) I haven't presumed to remove the statement, but am drawing it to your attention in case I've overlooked anything. – AndyFielding (talk) 10:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The same unsourced claim appears in the Pumpkin Papers article (but not the Pentagon Papers article). Will try to find support for this, but it seems a bit questionable to me. Suriname0 (talk) 14:58, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: In a PBS News Hour interview (transcript, jump to 3:20), historian Michael Beschloss makes this claim, but very vaguely. Suriname0 (talk) 15:02, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No "Pumpkin Papers" connection 

message: Disclosure: I have a COI, I work for an organization that Ellsberg co-founded and sits on the board of.
For the sentence that is currently marked with a citation needed tag: "In September 2015 Ellsberg and 27 other members..." (also needs a comma after 2015), it can be cited to this story by Andy Worthington. Legoktm (talk) 23:31, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: , although it's in the gray area of WP:BLPSPS with respect to organizational statements.  -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 04:45, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Coincidentally, I had just provided these exact cites, without having first seen your suggestion! Along with a few other minor stylistic fixes and one correction (War Resisters International, rather than War Resisters League (the WRI's US affiliate) as the sponsor of the August 1969 Haverford College conference where Ellsberg heard Kehler speak). PDGPA (talk) 19:30, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

text: I've added this book the "Books" section, and added it as a citation. Robertiton2 (talk) 01:17, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed
Talk:Granular synthesis

message: Propose merging the article Gabor atoms into this one. That article seems rather lonely, and in need of attention, and its main point seems to be to justify the ideas of this article; thus I propose a merge. linas 18:44, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems like a good idea only if we can flesh out a historical section on granular synthesis, and include it there.  I'd vote to leave it separate until then. Torc2 01:44, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  mergefrom [[Gabor atoms]] 

message: this isn't a synthesis method at all, but a type of sampling - it's proper title is Granular resynthesis. the title should probably be changed to reflect this and Granular synthesis redirected to the new page
Inzy 23:57, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Technically you might be correct, but Granular Synthesis is the more common name.  Often the waveforms are altered enough through enveloping and overlapping to be considered as a synthesis technique instead of merely a resynthesis technique. Torc2 01:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Granular resynthesis 

message: i removed the last sentence as this is widely spread among artists194.94.133.193 13:04, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Electronica artist and producer Brian Transeau (BT)uses this method in his tracks often." Hyacinth (talk) 02:53, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  artists 

message: How is granular synthesis related (if at all) to graintable synthesis? user:jimjamjak (talk) 10:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graintable synthesis 

message: Shouldn't Ableton Live be mentioned here in the software section and the Ableton Live page referenced back to here? I'd go ahead and add it, but I can't find a reference that Live does indeed use granular sythesis, despite the fact that the first time I heard of "granular resynthesis" is when I started playing around with Live 4 Lite. I may have my facts confused though. Slippyd (talk) 01:47, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ableton Live 

message: hello, I have tried several times to insert my software link on wiki, but italian Sbazzone wikiadmin continuously remove me  the link, i don't know the solutin.
I would only insert my link in the software section "only in english wiki", as the others analogue software.
I pray someone to verify the reliability of my project, then put the link or authorize me.
thanks best regards.
www.densitygs.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Varisto (talk • contribs) 13:41, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not possibile to write that link, because of WP:SPAM --Sbazzone (talk) 14:26, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  new Density software link
Talk:Inheritance (computer science)

message: Attempts of reading on the topic of "is-a" leads by way of redirects to here where the expression is not even mentioned once in the article. I wish people were not that trigger happy about redirects without doing the actual works of merging the topics and making sure there is no loss on the way.
In fact as the original topic stands it is more enlightening than the redirects it was replaced by.
:I too would like to have at least a short explanation of is a. --Abdull 17:22, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing definition of is-a 

message: Inheritance and polymorphism are not "dual views" of the same thing. I would rather say that they partially overlap, with the concept of subtyping polymorphism. Also this "dual view" stuff is explained quite poorly IMHO, in both articles.
Having said that, I just discovered that there are two inheritance pages (OOP and Computer science) and frankly I lost interest. Good luck.PizzaMargherita 22:04, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Relationship between inheritance and polymorphism

message: The introduction currently reads
:In object-oriented programming, inheritance is a way to form new classes (instances of which are called objects) using classes that have already been defined.
However, as far as I understand, the term inheritance is also used within the framework of prototype-based programming where classes do not exist as independent entities. I think this usage should be reflected in the definition. — Tobias Bergemann 12:04, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Prototype-based programming

message: In the Roles and inheritance section, what is meant with role (computer science)? --Abdull (talk) 15:53, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role 

message: Hello there. I suppose having examples with the text would certainly reinforce the ideas very nicely. This one seems to miss examples as is common with other computer science articles.Aijazbaig1 (talk) 10:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples needed 

message: 1.Single inheritance
2.Multiple inheritance
3.Multilevel inheritance
4.Hybrid inheritance
5.Hirarchical inheritance  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.168.54.186 (talk) 13:21, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  TYPES OF INHERITNCE
Talk:Neil Sheehan

message: Sheehan went to Harvard after working on his family's farm. He was not interested in writing and became a history major 
After graduating from Harvard, Sheehan joined the army and was sent to South Korea. He took a post as a military journalist to escape an army clerking job 
At age 25, Neil Sheehan was hired by UPI and assigned to their Tokyo office. He had only been working there for two weeks when he was suddenly promoted to Saigon bureau chief because he was the only person that could speak French 
After covering the war in Vietnam , Sheehan was assigned to the Pentagon and the White House during the Johnson and Nixon years. Vietnam dominated his newspaper career and his generation
Neil Sheehan
Born: October 27, 1936 - Holyoke, Massachusetts
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
After graduating from Harvard University, Sheehan served in the army (1959-62). He went to Vietnam as bureau chief for United Press  
International, and as a correspondent for the New York Times from 1964 he reported on the Vietnam War from Saigon and later Washington, D.C. In 1971 he obtained the classified Pentagon Papers from Daniel Ellsberg; his story in the Times about the secret history of the war related in the documents resulted in strenuous government attempts to halt publication and became perhaps the most celebrated news story of the decade. 
Sheehan's first book, The Arnheiter Affair (1972), deals with the flawed captain of a naval vessel. He spent some 15 years on his best-known work, A Bright Shining Lie (1988); a biography of Col. John Paul Vann that illuminates much of the war's history, it won universal acclaim and received the Pulitzer Prize. It was followed by After the War Was Over (1992). 
His wife, Susan Sheehan, is the author of several admired studies of the lives of members of the American underclass, including Is There No Place on Earth for Me? (1983, Pulitzer Prize). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robertkeller (talk • contribs) 22:41, 19 May 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I believe I may have come across another Neil Sheehan who seems notable (havent really looked into that much yet). Evaunit♥666♥ 05:05, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Neils?
Talk:Fritz Houtermans

message: "The Gestapo subjected him to brutal interrogation, accused of being a Soviet spy. Through efforts of Max von Laue, Houtermans was released in August 1940, whereupon he took a position at Forschungslaboratoriums für Elektronenphysik, a private laboratory of Manfred von Ardenne, in Lichterfelde, a suburb of Berlin."
Where do you have this story from? How could he be a spy, when he was exchanged from the USSR and being again imprisioned? Then, after 3 months taking an important position in German research ... says enough, doesn't it?
Removed that crap about Gestapo, etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.157.123.75 (talk) 17:07, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed gossip 

message: Why is he called a Austrian-Dutch-German physicist ? Because he had a Dutch-sounding family name ? What is his connection to Austria ? --193.175.73.206 (talk) 10:15, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Austrian-Dutch-German ?
Talk:History of Schleswig-Holstein

message: I don't know enough about the history of the region to talk about its factual accuracy, but the quality of the article as it stands now is a little on the poor side. It seems that everything has been written twice, by different authors who haven't read each other's work. Someone who can pick out the best should look at rewriting so that every fact is stated exactly as many times as necessary. As is stands, 13the century is not particularly chronological, bouncing back and forth in time and repeating itself.Hinakana 08:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up

message: As far as I am reading history of region, there were 3 nations present: Obodrites Saxons and Danes. In 19th and 20th century 2 nations struggled for it: Germans and Danes. Therefore history of middle dark ages is written from perspective of German-Danish conflict. What is missing are Obodrites, people that inhabited Eastern Holsteina and even for few years under Drosko owned almost all region. We need to complete history of their rise in power and then graduall fall - it took few centuries. I don't know how long it took in Holstein, but little bit closer to the south, language of Obodrite Drevani survived untill 19th century. Cautiuos2 (talk) 12:43, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Obodrites are missing
Talk:Ad

message: Should this be a diambiguation page given that "ad" is also a Latin word in use in many Latin phrases in the Wikipedia? --Dante Alighieri 01:06 20 May 2003 (UTC)
:Yes.  It was a redirect to advertising, which has a link at the top to Advert (disambigauation). This is not useful for people looking for the many other uses for Ad.  I've replaced it with a redirect to AD (disambiguation), which should be much more helpful to searchers. OneVeryBadMan 09:53, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:See

message: *See and SEE, both fairly short and likely targets of the same search. bd2412 T 15:22, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: See is another word for look.We use the eye to see. Past tense(saw)--Booggers1234 (talk) 15:20, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I came here seeking insight into that colleague's edit. I'm saddened by their subsequent apparent demise (or decline). Reverting now, per WP:DICT, and moving forward.--JerzyA (talk) 22:28, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  see
Talk:Silly, Belgium

message: Should this page include a mention of the usage of the word silly in English? I know that the Wikipedia is not a dictionary, but is it relevant in this case? --Dante Alighieri 01:27 20 May 2003 (UTC)
:It should definitely include a derivation of the name. (An information sign in the town said that it came from the river Sille / Zulle. (As the Dutch wp article also says.)) --David Edgar (talk) 16:32, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there's not a great deal of note in the town, with the exception of the brewery. (This produces the "Saison Silly" beer - I don't know if it's intentionally named to target the English-speaking market (Saison being a type of beer), but if not, it seems a useful coincidence.) --David Edgar (talk) 16:32, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Silly

message: A man named Max Fosh started a religion called Sillyism and claimed the town as its holy land. I personally think it would be funny if the article mentioned the religion. Liamc9509 (talk) 21:35, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do you think the article should mention the religion Sillyism?
Talk:British constitution

message: IMHO, putting something like "to be finished" or "under construction" at the end of the article is a little redundant.  The 'pedia is in a constant state of rewriting and editing anyway, and a statement like that implies to the general viewing public that we (or more specifically, the article's author) are doing our encyclopedia in a haphazard or half-baked fashion.  Sure, there's the suggestion that you always leave something out or an unanswered question to encourage people to keep working on Wikipedia, but it doesn't have to be THAT obvious.  There's my two cents. Darkwind 01:31 20 May 2003 (UTC)
----
Should the UN Declaration of Human Rights be included? -- Error
----
Who says that the UK has 'no constitution'? It sounds pretty suspect - can we reference that? Mark Richards 21:31, 12 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Talk:The Mary Tyler Moore Show

message: Citation 14, second greatest moment in TV history. I tried finding a working link, but the closest I could find is an article with a 1970s subset of the 100 greatest moments list. I'm trying to put it here in this comment, but I'm having trouble doing it from my phone, I'll try from a computer later. alisonjo2786 (talk) 20:16, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entertainment Weekly link no longer working 

message: Why is there no mention here of the character Gordy?  He was a black character played by John Amos, who later went on to the show "Good Times." 162.201.218.238 (talk) 00:03, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly only because nobody has thought to add a mention of Gordy or worked out a context in which to mention him without giving him undue weight. Or perhaps there isn't much to say about himhow much was his character developed? Did the role receive much coverage in reliable sources? For what it's worth, it seems Gordy appeared in only 14 episodesone out of every 12 that were broadcast; I'm not sure how much screen time he had in those; and I don't know whether he had the spotlight in any of those episodes. Bess Lindstrom and Marie Slaughter, who were in fewer episodes than Gordy, are mentioned in the article, but not in their own right, only alluded to in the course of elaborating on two major characters (the mother of one, the husband of the other). If you can think of a way to include Gordy in the article that's proportionate to his role and what is known about him, go for it!  Largoplazo (talk) 00:33, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Amos as Gordon "Gordy" Howard 

message: Editors have been disagreeing over whether MTM's hat toss during the opening credits occurred in front of Donaldson's or Dayton's department store. There are sources to support each, such as this for Dayton's and this for Donaldson's. Can we reach a solid conclusion or should we omit mention of the store? Largoplazo (talk) 22:28, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which store behind the hat toss