Talk:G-Shock

message: :Image:Cockpit G-Shock.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:21, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Cockpit G-Shock.jpg

message: The "Wave Ceptor" watches from casio can at least receive the German and UK time signal since as far back as 10 Years. See the module page for 5033 Edifice Module.
So you really can't lump this together like that or at least it needs to be qualified by a credible source. I really can't be arsed to make changes in the article, since any Edits by lowly anonymous users are not even looked at before putting them in the trash lol, so if anyone wants to have a got at that, feel free. 2001:16B8:6063:DA00:BCCB:B7E4:AD76:7EA4 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 15:59, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Then don't be arsed to make asinine remarks if you cannot improve what you complain about.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.39.41.123 (talk) 07:05, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Information about time signals is wrong

message: The information is not correct. There are no proper links which say that the DW-5600E (fifth letter E) is flight qualified by NASA. The 5600-C is. This model will be deleted if no links are given. -59.95.11.45 (talk) 10:32, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  DW-5600E (Module 3229) NASA flight qualified 

message: Please refer to www.mygshock.com, or watchreport.com for authentic info. -59.95.11.45 (talk) 10:34, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Stop promoting sites over an informative article. 110.39.41.123 (talk) 07:06, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia is NOT an authentic site for info about G-shocks 

message: All the stuff in the article about special forces use, shock resistance etc. is just Casio PR. G-shock is another high profile fashion brand, no more no less, just like Swatch before it, and the article should say so. --Ef80 (talk) 01:37, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I added a good source I found that could be utilized much more: http://www.nippon.com/en/views/b00105/. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 19:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New source 

message: the external links in the modules tables are broken and need fixing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-Shock#Modules  — Preceding unsigned comment added by YipC (talk • contribs) 12:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  module links need fixing 

message: Are they necessary wrist-watches or can be pocket watches? I has boldly changed to wrist-watch class at Wikidata item. Infovarius (talk) 14:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which type of watch?