Talk:Treatment Advocacy Center

message: I was surprised by the lack of criticism of the TAC and/or Dr. Torrey, *many* people in the recovery community find him (and his views) to be highly offensive; I read most of the old flame war here and it seemed like one woman vs. someone who posted only under an IP number, she may have been a little extreme but I actually agree with her and think her POV needs at least to be represented, surely a concise paragraph of criticism would be acceptable? (It seems the conflict was resolved by resorting to the most bland and neutral, but also mainstream, way of presenting the issues involved. If nothing else one need only look at the Wiki page for Dr. Torrey himself to see critiques (I know, I know, I could copy and rewrite them myself and insert them here, in fact I may do it when I have some more time and the mental energy.)Historian932 (talk) 04:24, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of criticism of TAC/Torrey 

message: This "Treatment Advocacy Center" is nothing of the sort. All it really advocates is for the forced drugging of people who might be a bit different. They invite a debate on their website to use facebook but then they delete/hide your posts.
Really, I don't see why this is even on Wikipedia. It is nothing but propaganda and they are using Wikipedia to gain efficacy. Fact is, they separated from NAMI because NAMI is clearly big pharma financed. They don't discuss where the Stanley Blah Blah Blah Research Blah Blah comes from. Most of the time they are funding drugs. So here you have an organization that funds drugs and a spin-off "Advocacy Center" that then lobbies legislature to modify laws to force the use of these "drugs". That is CLEARLY a conflict of interest and the guy running it is in a top position for both non-profits.
Someone please remove this crap from Wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.207.28.109 (talk) 04:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  CENSORSHIP 

message: I deleted the entire Wikipedia article as it was totally plagiarized from The Treatment Advocacy Center's website. www.treatmentadvocacycenter.org/about-us 64.134.102.119 (talk) 03:46, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted plagiarized writing 

message: Substantial original content has been inserted several times without appropriate sources and not following policy (WP:V, WP:NPOV and WP:MOS). Challenged edits must be supported by sources and accepted by consensus here on talk. - - MrBill3 (talk) 00:42, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources needed to support additional content 

message: I reverted several changes made in the last few days. Please discuss here and reach consensus before making substantial changes. MrBill3 (talk) 06:24, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: JanetHaysNOLA, if you have any connection to this company, seemingly based on your edits, you may have a conflict of interest. Such editing is discouraged on Wikipedia. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 07:04, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The organization's website is not an independent reliable source WP:RS nor is another organization with amazingly aligned goals. However the second citation you gave refers to a number of studies/publications that may be. If as suggested above an editor has a conflict of interest WP:COI this policy needs to be followed, particularly if an editor is paid to edit Wikipedia. MrBill3 (talk) 05:07, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes reverted