lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:OpenThesaurus

message: I hope the sources are okay now?
I found two (german) articles on the subject - one that tells about the integration in OpenOffice and one that tells how the project works. The rest should be verifyable by going to the project homepage, I think, where you can try it and download the OpenOffice- and KWord-files...--Speck-Made 20:30, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Here's another potentially relevant paper (being the founder of OpenThesaurus, I'm not going to add it myself): Worth its weight in gold or yet another resource—A comparative study of Wiktionary, OpenThesaurus and GermaNet --Dnaber (talk) 08:54, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, it is very interesting paper. I added it to the article Wiktionary. -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 14:19, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. What about adding it here, too? I'm just wondering because this article still has the warning about missing non-primary sources from 2007(!). --Dnaber (talk) 11:17, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  More sources
Talk:Fortunate number

message: I think these are "Fortunate numbers" (with a capital F) because they're named after Reo Fortune. Am I right or wrong about this? CompositeFan 20:35, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: David Bryant has directed my attention to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mathematics/Archive_24#Capitalization_question. CompositeFan 16:38, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

text: What are you referring to? Has anybody said there is a problem? PrimeHunter (talk) 14:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

message: The opening definition seems roundabout.  Reading it, I found it easier to use Google to find other sites on the topic to nail down what this article's current definition was supposed to mean.   After which I thought about how to express the idea more directly, and came up with:
Fortunate(n) = Prime(x) - Primorial(n)
where:
Prime(x) >  Primorial(n) > Prime(x-1)
Opinions welcome as to which definition is clearer.  I suppose spelling out the function names might not be the current policy, if that offends, just replace it with whatever shorthand series or functional notation is current:
Fn = Px - Pn#
where:
Px > Pn# > P(x-1)
One flaw I can see is that it might lead readers to suppose we're out to find 'x' as well, when we don't so much care what 'x' is, just so it's prime.  Try again:
Fortunate(n) = NextPrime(Primorial(n)) - Primorial(n)
Seems clear enough. 
  --AC (talk) 08:16, 19 January 2010
(UTC)
:Another benefit of the latter.  No 'm' variable needed.  --AC (talk) 08:20, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current definition somewhat difficult
Talk:James Gillespie's High School

message: I've rewritten this article to wiki standards
and have applied most of the changes noted above i.e. infobox
Wajidhaq (talk) 13:30, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: The school does not enjoy a mixture of ancient and modern architecture.  The oldest building there is Brunstfield house - aff the tap o ma heid its seventeenth century, which is still pretty old, but nowhere near old enough to be called ancient.  And given the state of the modern buildings, I don't think many folk are "enjoying" it much either...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.35.212.48 (talk) 23:59, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Ancient" and Modern
Template talk:WikiProject Buddhism

message: I'm not involved in WikiProject Buddhism, but I sometimes edit an article to which the  banner has been added, and it's just huge. We're resisting the urge to put it in a bannershell to conserve Talk page space, because that would have the side-effect of obscuring your Project information, which we'd prefer not to do if there are other options.
Is it possible the Project banner can be made somewhat shorter? In particular, the Guidelines section may not be needed in every article Talk page. / edg ☺ ★ 20:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Banner size

message: Please replace
 Dharma Wheel.svg
with
 Dharma Wheel (2).svg
:File:Dharma Wheel.svg on Commons was originally black and white, but was overwritten by a yellow version in 2008. The black and white version was restored in 2021, and the yellow version moved to :File:Dharma Wheel (2).svg, though this had the side effect of changing all current uses of the image without notification. Since the image has been used in this template since 2009 (as the yellow version), the template source should be updated to maintain the appearance it always had. Paul_012 (talk) 11:07, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: * Pppery * it has begun... 15:36, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 4 April 2022
Template talk:Football in India

message: Just thought to add the Indian flags on the side a few days back to make the template better Suprah™ 20:48, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Isn't it important to add the 2017 FIFA U-17 World Cup in here, being that it was the first FIFA tournament ever held in India? 200.217.197.55 (talk) 11:42, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  2017 U-17 World Cup
Talk:Fascia (architecture)

message: The photograph used is not helpful. It does not identify which part is the fascia, for people who don't know. A better photo or diagram would have the fascia painted in a different color, and identified as such by color. Likewise, for the article on soffits. Benefac (talk) 05:35, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs better picture to make clear what is the fascia

message: For such a short article, it is truly confusing. Also, how does a bargeboard differ from a fascia? If the terms don't materially differ, then merge the articles. Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 17:01, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Me six''' - bargeboard vs fascia - merge?
Talk:IPod Classic

message: I've tried to change to article to reflect the fact that the link to the official website is a dead link, but I'm not sure if I have done so correctly. Doonagatha (talk) 07:41, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official website 

message: The article says the connectors are USB/Firewire but the iPod Classic connectors were all Apple's 32 pin proprietary connector which was discontinued with the discontinuation of the classic 6th generation. Or did i miss something?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmhowitt (talk • contribs) 08:39, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: At the host end, the wire is USB-A or Firewire. At the iPod end, it's 30-pin. The reason we bother to state that it was USB/Firewire on the host end is because the iPod hails to a bygone era when it wasn't unheard of for devices to connect to PC via an ancient "D-Sub" 9-pin serial or 25-pin parallel connector (designed in the 1970s!). For example, the Rio PMP300 connected via the parallel printer port. Heck, when the first-gen iPod came out, Sony was still insisting that it was totally cool for users to record their MP3s to MiniDisc via an analog connection! — TheHerbalGerbil(TALK|STALK), 05:53, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  USB? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Blondbirb (talk) 00:46, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Advanced Writing and Research
Talk:Fortified houses in Ireland

message: Could we see some consistent use of capitalization, please?  "Fortified house" is not a proper noun, and should not be capitalized, therefore this stub should be moved to "Fortified house".  The article title should not be plural. 12.22.250.4 21:04, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Kusma (talk) 10:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalization

message: Fortified houses are something existing in the whole world, not only in Ireland. The article must reflect this. --Attilios (talk) 17:53, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Ireland

message: The page is about Irish Fortified Houses - a specific type of house built in Ireland in the late 16th to mid 17th century. The term is an architectural and archaeological name given to these Irish type houses.  Attilios, you need to know the subject you are reviewing. It appears you do not!!!! (austin1935)Austin1935 (talk) 16:51, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, "fortified house" in English means "house which had been fortified" (in fact in other languages the correspondent term does NOT refer to Irish houses), and this is something existing everywhere in the world having had flourishing cities in the Middle Ages. Fortified House (capitalized) is OK here in this article. Ciao and good work. --Attilios (talk) 11:23, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Yes Ireland
Talk:Herman (bishop of Salisbury)

message: The Catholic Encyclopedia calls him 'Herman of Wilton'. Common enough to include? — LlywelynII 08:10, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: * bio at Royal Berkshire History
 — LlywelynII 08:10, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for article expansion
Talk:The Michael Teachings

message: Removed claimed POV dispute tag for lack of dispute.  Before restoring the tag indicate which portion is in dispute and why.  --Vaughan Pratt (talk) 06:16, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Apparently over the years some people have made it their mission to severely restrict the information on this wiki entry. The Michael Teachings do not neatly fit into a box, such as religion, philosophy, or New Age, although arguments could be made for each of those categories. Because of the relatively small number of people interested in the teachings, national book sales are not that high and getting any new information published that way is an uphill battle. If you restrict the information to only that based on published books, you might as well encase this entry in amber and walk away. There are several well-established, long term (over 20 years for many) sites that are the active places for information and discussion of the material.  The external links that are on this page are among those, but there are several others, such as truthloveenergy.com that get deleted every time someone posts them here. What is the justification for deciding which external links stay? And don't quote the wiki rules to me, I am very familiar with the sites involved, and for the purposes of a wiki entry I don't see any substantial difference between the ones that stay and the ones that go.SageScholar (talk) 20:55, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Facebook is not an acceptable WP:EL. I also don't see what your other links add to the article. I'm afraid I'm going to quote wikipedia rules at you, specifically WP:ELNO and note that wikipedia is not a directory, a platform, or a webhost; see WP:NOT. As to sources, see WP:RS. If you don't want wikipedia rules quoted to you as justification, then what would you accept? Verbal chat 21:00, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

text: I justify following wikipedia rules as this is wikipedia. It is also not a place to right great wrongs or fight for "the truth. Verbal chat 21:27, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

text: You're right, anyone can use google to find these links so it is not imperative they are here. I've gone through the links with reference to WP:EL. Please do not restore any (again) if you disagree, but discuss here with reference to why they are suitable per wikipedia's rules. The burden is upon those seeking to add links. Thanks, Verbal chat 16:35, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links for the Michael Teachings
Talk:Sleepwalk this Way

message: Sleepwalk this Way is the original article with significant history. Would like to move this article to Sleepwalk This Way to correct the spelling to match the TV Guide listing. The move destination has a stub article with 3 items in the history which is preventing the move. Would like to move the old history to the new destination and overwrite the history that is currently there. Both articles redirect to the same place now but would like to preserve the history of the original in case it is decided to revert to a previously good article. --NrDg 21:28, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Sleepwalk This Way

message: Sleepwalk this Way is the original article with significant history. Would like to move that article over Sleepwalk This Way to correct the spelling to match the TV Guide listing. The move destination has a stub article with 3 items in the history which is preventing the move. Would like to move the old history to the new destination and overwrite the history that is currently there. Both articles redirect to the same place now but would like to preserve the history of the original in case it is decided to revert to a previously good article. --NrDg 21:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:FRELIMO

message: I edited this page to include a discussion of FRELIMO's ideology about women's emancipation as well as the role women played in the war of independence and the resulting transition of power from traditional authorities to revolutionary authorities. I also added a paragraph on FRELIMO's quota system.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Womeninhistory123 (talk • contribs) 13:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Inclusion of women

message: Shouldn't this article be renamed FRELIMO? I've always heard of it under its abbreviation, rather than with its full name. Even in history books FRELIMO seems to be far preferred.--Aldux 21:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If nobody objects, I'll move the article to FRELIMO (or Frelimo) in the nexyt days.--Aldux 13:41, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move it?

message: The flag in communist style that currently is depicted here, is the **OLD** FRELIMO flag.
It is utterly wrong showing it here; either replace it by the current one (couldn't find one on FRELIMO's official homepage; only a description in Portguese ) or remove it altogether.
Christoph Scholz (talk) 09:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong flag 

message: There is a line of though that defends that the FRELIMO as Front of Liberation of Mozambique ended at the 3rd Congress in February 1977 and was replaced by the Partido Frelimo (not capitalized),a vanguard , Marxist-Leninist party. Accordingly, maybe the article "FRELIMO" should be split in two: one on the front, the other on the party. Teixant (talk) 22:05, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If one ended exactly when the other began, and their names are so similar, then the distinction will probably cause more confusion that it alleviates. My 2 cents' worth. Wegesrand (talk) 14:31, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  FRELIMO or Partido Frelimo (Frelimo Party) 

message: What is the merit of the section listing countries which have at one point in time in one way or another supported FRELIMO? It seems to me this should either be deleted, with the more important cases of foreign support integrated into the history (with proper citations) or expanded such that the ways in which "support" was rendered and when these events our red are clear; without this information the section is confusing and possibly misleading. Conchyliatus (talk) 22:22, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foreign Support 
Talk:Vegan Outreach

message: Its a good, detailed article, but perhaps a bit too detailed when it comes to things like naming every employee, as if the world needs/wants to know this.  It makes it look like a VO person wrote it (which, not meaning to be unkind, they probably did!) and overall lowers the encyclopedic tone.  Trimming it down a bit would improve the readability and gravitas.
IceDragon64 (talk) 22:11, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Talking about the founders with first names ("Matt" did this and "Joe" did that), and saying the organization is growing "by leaps and bounds", makes it read like the organization's press release. Not quarreling with the content of the article, just the tone. I'm going to add a Template:Newsrelease tag to the talk page (not to the article itself--I don't think the tone problems are that bad). -- Narsil (talk) 19:59, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone of article 

message: Due to SPAs adding material that seems designed to make this article look like an advertisement for the subject, similar activity by the same editors on closely-related articles, and off-Wiki evidence, I think it is very likely that that undisclosed paid editing is going on here. 2603:3004:609:700:E492:3D0B:6B6A:760C (talk) 11:50, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag
Talk:Arkansas River Trail

message: Does anyone have a good map of this trail (or can make one)? The only one I've found is really bad quality... like a low resolution scanner: http://www.rivertrail.org/PDF/ArkRiverTrailMap_8x10.pdf  Binarypower 21:35, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Map
Talk:Let's Face It!

message: This is almost a Start-class article.  It only needs a little more detail in the plot synopsis.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:57, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Fender Bullet

message: (cross-post to Talk:Squier Bullet and Talk:Fender Bullet)
Do "Squier Bullet" and "Fender Bullet" refer to the same thing?  If so, shouldn't we merge the articles? -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 21:46, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that I've taken a closer look at the two articles, Squier Bullet suggests that they are the same; i.e. Fender has made Bullet guitars since 1980, while Fender Bullet specifies that the "Squier Bullet" designation wasn't used until 1984. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 21:52, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: Who is he, to merit a personal mention in the very first line of the lead? Isn't there any more important information available which should go ahead of that? --BjKa (talk) 22:30, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Page 

message: This information is incomplete and incorrect.. a simple example of how is just go look up the fender bullet H2.. 84.68.234.209 (talk) 00:48, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone needs to do their research..
Talk:Flask

message: Flask, a word which can mean bottle or container, originates in English from Late Latin, and has even older roots which could be either Latin, Germanic, or Celtic (see here and here).
* Flask (archaeology): small containers for liquids, known in ceramic and glass form from ancient Egypt, Mesopotamia, Rome, and Byzantium (see examples here, here and here)
Arminden (talk) 18:23, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good material parked here until "flask" article is created 

message: Flask 120.29.78.129 (talk) 14:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemistry
Talk:Creep

message: Committee to Re-Elect the President: Should this be at the top of the page, or under "in history"? It's currently in both. Vyxx (talk) 04:00, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: as in creepy person, the kind of person who rings visceral alarm bells...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.237.218.199 (talk) 09:32, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bizarre that noone tempts to actually define what a creep is =
Template talk:Paisley and Barrhead District Railway

message: By adding the various lines that are crossed / connected to by the Paisley and Barrhead District Railway and a minimal filling in of the gaps (Gleniffer Goods Depot added this evening), this template now substantially also covers the Barrhead Branch of the G&SWR. The only detail not given here that is on :Template:Barrhead Branch is the junctions at Paisley West.
Thoughts? --Stewart (talk) 22:00, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Barrhead Branch|Barrhead Branch G&SWR]]
Talk:Pedinomonadaceae

message: Unless I'm missing something, the articles Pedinophyceae, Pedinomonadales, and Pedinomonadaceae should be merged into a single article in accord with "In cases where a group only contains a single subgroup, the two should not be separated (unless the higher-ranked group has had multiple circumscriptions, and an article is written to cover them all)." at WP:TOL.  Then the only question is which name to use.  My instinct is to use the family name, because people tend to use family names in contexts like scientific paper titles ("Eupatorium (Asteraceae)" and the like), but I don't really have a strong opinion.  I could also imagine putting a merged article at Pedinophyceae. Kingdon (talk) 03:16, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now done this. Kingdon (talk) 19:54, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge of Pedinophyceae, Pedinomonadales, and Pedinomonadaceae
Talk:WJOU

message: WOCG is now apparently WJOU... Same licensee (Oakwood College), same frequency(90.1) - no information on their web site indicating reason for the change.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 00:31, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: FCC Update
Talk:Jurijus Kadamovas and Iouri Mikhel

message: Jurijus Kadamovas is a citizen of Lithuania. One of the sources - https://kultura.lrytas.lt/meno-pulsas/2010/12/23/news/i-kauna-sugrizo-jav-mirtininku-potepiai-nuotraukos--5606549/ Ttk371 (talk) 21:53, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality of Jurijus Kadamovas
Talk:Portmeirion Pottery

message: I suggest that Susan Williams-Ellis is merged into Portmeirion Pottery. Portmeirion Pottery's story is very much linked to the story of Susan Williams-Ellis, and the two could be better dealt with on a single page, in my opinion. --h2g2bob (talk) 22:44, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge not needed. Snowman 12:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from Susan Williams-Ellis 

message: Is the village of Portmeirion in this case the same one as the Portmeirion where Patrick McGoohan's classic television series, "The Prisoner", was filmed?  Thanks.  202.138.16.99 10:29, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. -- Derek Ross | Talk 22:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portmeirion from McGoohan's The Prisoner? 

message: wikipedia list this as being a private company, yet it seems to be listed on the LSE- http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PMP.L&display=summary&it=le
have I missed something here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.2.12.218 (talk) 17:28, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public Company? 
Talk:Cultural depictions of Stonehenge

message: 
Should the section entitled "In contemporary popular culture" be kept in the article, or is it a case of WP:INDISCRIMINATE? 13:13, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDISCRIMINATE]] 

message: Art and mythology but not a single mention of literature e.g. Hardy's Tess of the d'Urbervilles? And perhaps equally notable, in the context of a 5000-year history, what about music, including popular music, even album covers? For example the many items in: this Google image Search? Martinevans123 (talk) 15:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, a very popular recent depiction was in the spoof Rockumentary ’This is Spinal Tap’ In the cult film the band have a stage set built in the style of Stonehenge. Due to a mix up it has been built in inches rather than feet , and is ridiculously small. They then have to hire dwarves to represent ’the people of Stone’enge’ and dance around the stones on stage. This fictional episode is based on the stage set built in real life for UK heavy metal pioneers Black Sabbath in the 1970s. Their mix up meant that the stage stone Sarsens were built in metres rather than feet, so were about 3 times the size of the actual Stonehenge sarsens. Black Sabbath were only able to use this stage set at the Birmingham NEC as other arenas could not accommodate it.  CLK1969 (talk) 08:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: CLK1969, if you are considering adding this to the article, you'll need to supply some good sources to support it. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Literature and music? 

message: There's a facility in Ace Combat called Stonehenge; is that significant enough to fit here? 98.32.23.118 (talk) 01:57, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional references 

message: Very surprised there is no mention of Deller's Clonehenge. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:52, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Jeremy Deller]]