Talk:Oregon–Oregon State football rivalry

message: Isn't the Big Game between Cal and Stanford the oldest rivalry game on the West Coast?  []  This Pac-10 release shows that the Big Game is older and the Civil War is most contested. Peter J. Mello, Jr. 01:15, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Oldest?

message: I made the "scores" section two columns for better readability. I'd like to make it into a table in the future, perhaps in 3 columns; notes could be separated out as footnotes. One question - it seems that the home field is not reflected in this chart. Is that so? It would be nice to have that info in there somehow. -Pete 23:48, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, making all those changes is a good idea.  VegaDark 04:03, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Standard sports etiquette says list the home team second, but in this case I think it would be easier to just bold the home team and make a note of that fact on the top. I would also suggest maybe several tables with headers between so people could use the TOC to skip to the era they want, maybe: Start to 1919, 1920 to 1949, 1950 to 1979, 1980 to current. Or something like that, though I think every decade would be a little too much. I think it would also make it easier to edit with sections. Aboutmovies 04:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Once the scores are moved, then I'll see about making home team second, and maybe bold the winner so it stands out. For now it's enough work just moving the scores into the table and adding the notes. But anyone can Just Do It. I think color coding might be too much work plus the visual issue. The years are that way only because I went with a table that was 8X3, so 24 year blocks. So no hidden meaning. When I get to the WWII years I'll add them in with notes. Should I make the table be one more column? Aboutmovies 22:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Pete, looks good. Now you can do the other table too :).Aboutmovies 03:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  scores 

message: :Image:Nikeized logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:15, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Nikeized logo.jpg

message: As I've been putting these into the tables, should we make it "ducks" and "beavers" instead of Oregon and Oregon AC/OSC/OSU/OS? That would make it consistant throughout, and the footnotes would clarify the changing name of OSU. Thoughts? Aboutmovies 17:24, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't agree. Just saying 'Ducks' and 'Beavers' instead of 'Oregon' and 'OSU' wouldn't be consistent with the other sports articles, which all use 'Oregon' when referring to the Oregon Ducks, and 'OSU' when talking about the Beavers. I believe it should remain the way it is now. FreakyMutantMan (talk) 06:40, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scores Round II 

message: The Oregonian had a game-by-game recap of the entire Civil War, available here. Would be considered a solid reference if used. --Bobak (talk) 19:59, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valuable article for references 

message: The image :Image:Oregon State Beavers logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page. DavidSSabb (talk) 01:28, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Oregon State Beavers logo.png

message: The lead says that the Civil War is "the seventh-oldest college football rivalry game in the United States." The article, List of NCAA college football rivalry games, lists about twenty games that started  earlier, and ten games that started the same year, 1894. Am I missing something? Grayfell (talk) 02:30, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that sentence probably meant to refer to the list of Most played rivalries in NCAA Division I FBS (lots of games started earlier but didn't continue). It's a little hard to compare the games on the list since some have already been played and some haven't, but it looks to me that it will be tied for seventh on that list at the end of the season. I'll edit the lead. Good catch. --Esprqii (talk) 04:57, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  7th oldest rivalry game? 

message: Contrary to columnist John Canzano, Boise State and Oregon are still officially scheduled to meet on September 14, 2024. Please wait until either Oregon team confirms for next year.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:39, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact, StubHub is already selling tickets to that game between Boise State & Oregon (event #152573548).   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 21:50, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2024?