Talk:Panzer Dragoon (video game)

message: Wasn't Panzer Dragoon (One) the first game in gaming industry ever to top 1 million dollar development budget? --Abdull 09:37, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not even close, Dragon's Lair 1983 was. (Untagged comment by 67.167.117.10 - ThomasWinwood 11:01, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should the games not be given separate pages? There seems to be a web of redirects to this page; this seems misleading - Panzer Dragoon Zwei is not Panzer Dragoon. ThomasWinwood 11:02, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Articles on a series are not unusual. Whether it's merited in this case or not is an entirely different story. Nifboy 18:22, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split off separate Panzer Dragoon games? 

message: :Image:Panzer Dragoon Boxart.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 16:49, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can we please use the Japanese cover with Moebius' artwork? (Momus (talk) 18:39, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Panzer Dragoon Boxart.jpg

message: Nice work on the article. In response to a request at the VG Wikiproject's talk page, I have decided to come here. Here's how I would review this article to pass a GA nomination:
*Lead section - needs to summarize the article, and be at least 3 to 4 paragraphs
*Plot section - looks good.
*Development section - looks good.
*Gameplay section - also looks good as well.
*Release section - may need to be included in the article.
*Reception section - also looks good as well. However, you may need to include reviewers as well to explain unfamiliar readers and is the proper way of sourcing (i.e. "Joe blah of IGN" instead of just "IGN").
*References - may need to include links
*Copyedit - This article must undergo a thorough copyediting.
Other than that, I think the article looks good. Any other suggestions or ideas would be very much appreciated. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 22:14, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The references in the reception section need some work, such as volume, issue, page number, and author if possible.  In their current state, there's no way to know where the information is. —<B>Torchiest</B> talkedits 22:17, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: For most of the 1995 reviews I used the Mobygames page for the game () so it may take time to find some of these details. I've seen a scan of the gamepro review, I added the page number but no reviewer name was mentionned.Folken de Fanel (talk) 22:33, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Take a look at Template:Video game reviews.  I added it and a couple scores from the sources you've got, but try to put them all in it.  There are lots of common review sources that have their own parameters already set up. —<B>Torchiest</B> talkedits 12:33, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that, I'll work on this section a bit more ;) Folken de Fanel (talk) 15:37, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Something else that would be good to do is separate out all the various reviews into their own paragraphs or sentences.  Right now, you've got the line "There was some criticism over the game's lack of diversity in weapons, it's predetermined progression and its overall difficulty, however most publications presented it as one of the Saturn's system seller.[28][29][30][31][32]".  Compressing five different complete reviews into one sentence like that is missing out on a lot of great information.  It would be nice to get a more specific understanding of what each reviewer thought. —<B>Torchiest</B> talkedits 19:45, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA discussion 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Panzer Dragoon (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120716105110/http://www.1up.com/features/panzer-dragoon-zwei-retrospective?pager.offset=1 to http://www.1up.com/features/panzer-dragoon-zwei-retrospective?pager.offset=1
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6FhIWMhzW?url=http://www.1up.com/do/feature?pager.offset=2 to http://www.1up.com/do/feature?pager.offset=2&cId=3162632
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150629072014/http://www.1up.com/features/egm-200-greatest-videogames?pager.offset=2 to http://www.1up.com/features/egm-200-greatest-videogames?pager.offset=2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:33, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)