lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sobrino de Botín

message: This is me, looking directly at the book titled "2008 Guiness Book of World Records"
98.117.140.24 (talk) 18:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well thats so nice of you. Instead of posting any bullshit about "Oh no its not" it would be better to say WHAT YOU ACTUALLY READ IN THAT BOOK. No but you gotta be a stupid piece of poop just stating something and then running away. --95.88.227.44 (talk) 17:18, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Whoa, this isnt the oldest restaurant

message: La Tour d'Argent is supposed to have been opened in 1582 so is Botin the oldest continuously open restaurant or the oldest? Just confused. Sarahr511 (talk) 23:11, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Oldest?

message: Emilio Botín is the chairman of Banco Santander SA. Is there a family connection to James Botin, the founder of the restaurant? Does Emilio's family have some ownership now or in the past? Brettreasure (talk) 10:03, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emilio Botin 

message: Id like a clarification on what it means by oldest restaurant because there are many restaurants to have been open for much long 
Stiftskeller St. Peter has been open since 803
Zur Letzten Instanz has been open since 1621 
La Tour d’Argent has been open since 1582 
 The list goes on and on so how can the Sobrino de Botin that has been open since 1725 be the oldest in the world when it isnt even top 3 Thelawyercultist (talk) 01:15, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Id like a clarification on what it means by oldest restaurant
Talk:Sobrassada

message: Excuse me but this is wrong! I am a Spaniard and this word "sobrassada" does NOT exist! It's called "sobresada" and that's the true and only valid spelling for this food. Please correct this immediately!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.91.24.138 (talk) 14:38, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely not, the only valid form accepted by RAE dictionary is "sobrasada" http://lema.rae.es/drae/?val=sobrasada Besides, the article uses the native majorcan word in catalan: "sobrassada" --Daerun (talk) 08:46, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: SPELLING IS WRONG! IT'S SOBRESADA!!!!
Talk:Peters Cartridge Company

message: See the first two sources listed. under References.  Nightscream 06:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Research Tag

message: I don't care to get into an edit war here, but I still oppose this deletion. This article does need some cleanup (I see "King Hill Residents" being used as a reference as a glaring example), but the last reference's title alone, which seems legit at face value, makes the deleted material plausible enough to want a solid historical reference available before we delete this information. The URL given by the deleter does not work, and I spent time poking around that general page and found information about this site - but nothing refuting the deleted information. This information has withstood numerous editors, some of them experienced and making good contributions to this article. I request a discussion here, and hopefully some third opinions, to decide if we should keep this material or not. I have left a message on the deleter's talkpage inviting him/her to give their opinion. Tanthalas39 (talk) 05:26, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Personal anecdotes constitute Original Research, and are not valid as sources. Please see Wikipedia: Original Research, Wikipedia:Citing Sources and Wikipedia: Reliable Sources. Nightscream (talk) 04:29, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion discussion

message: We need to really expand the history section. Right now it seems to all be about the explosion listed. We need to write about what they were actually doing - what kind of ammo, for whom, how much, etc. Help and sources are appreciated as always. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 18:16, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand history 

message: I have added some more categories to the article, pertaining to the location, and why it was chosen. But also a few notable explosions that people may want to know more about, since many people know the factory has its share of explosions, why not give the article some examples. To this day the land has been bought multiple times, I found it beneficial to the article to include what else it had been used for. PowersD (talk) 15:11, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions 

message: Deleted the phrase "Up to Today" in the last section, seeing as the article will constantly need to be updated if that information changes if that language is used.CheeseBurgerDude79 (talk) 19:19, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small Change
Talk:Association of Academies of the Spanish Language

message: I see that you reverted my deletion. I disagree with your reasons for the revert. If the cited article is analyzed the reader can realize that the Judeo-Spanish branch is not yet a member of the ASALE. According to the Guardian article itself, the Spanish Royal Academy "has announced plans to create a Judeo-Spanish branch in Israel that will sit alongside the 23 existing academies" and "nine Ladino specialists had so far been appointed to help pave the way for the new institution, which will form part of the Association of Spanish Language Academies". Notice that it uses the future tense, neither the present nor the past tense. The branch "will sit" and "will form part of". Nowhere in the Guardian article says that the branch is already a member of ASALE, in whose website there is no mention of that academy. In addition, I also searched for news regarding the Judeo-Spanish branch in the Royal Spanish Academy and the ASALE websites and I only found one news article from 2015  that talks about a future ladino academy not an already existing one. Thinker78 (talk) 07:20, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Then rather than delete, we can just provide some context. Surely that's better for readers. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:32, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't consider that the National Academy of Judaeo-Spanish convened in 2015 if by 2018 it hadn't even been created yet. Consider revising that info. Thinker78 (talk) 10:15, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for that. What say you now? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:06, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what branch are you referring to. You wrote in the article, "lead to the creation of the Israeli branch", but the source you cited says, and I quote, . In addition, it is unclear if it can be said that it has been founded if it hasn't been created yet. Thinker78 (talk) 18:15, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

text: Sorry, but I think that the ASALE sourcehttp://www.asale.org/noticias/se-acuerda-la-creacion-de-la-academia-nacional-del-judeoespanol-en-israel clearly states that it is not created yet. It says, and I quote, "el director de la Real Academia Española (RAE)(...) ha anunciado hoy en rueda de prensa la futura creación de una academia del judeoespañol ("the director of the Royal Spanish Academy (RAE)(...) has announced today in a press conference the future creation of an academy of Judeo-Spanish"). Thinker78 (talk) 21:38, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, you are correct. I think the wording I have now is accurate. Thanks for working thru this with me. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:55, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding revert of deletion of information regarding Judeo-Spanish branch
Talk:The Coalition of the Willing (band)

message: "Hang on" please as existence of this page will result in an easy cross reference for a varied music listening audience that is derived from several different, active and prolific musicians each with multiple side projects.
I suspect the code "db-band" refers to "dead beat." This is a short sighted designation.Steve3849 06:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The template  refers to "delete because". And as it indiciates it is a reference to a band that does not assert notability to be included in an encyclopedia. RichMac (Talk) 08:54, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

text: You can assert they have notoriety and acclaim, but this needs to be documented in reliable sources such as music magazines and cited in the article.  ColourBurst 21:09, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm thinking my assertion that several of the artists have "notoriety" would not need to be supported in this article because this is not an article about the musicians themselves, but a particular project to which they have contributed. Wouldn't reliable sources regarding those particular artists more appropriately be found by following the musician's wiki-links within this article?Steve3849 00:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If the only thing that makes this band notable is the notoriety of the artists in the band (number 5 under the general criteria in the guideline), then, yes, you'll need to establish that here with reliable sources. If you can't find sufficient independent sources with meaningful coverage of this band, then the article will have to be deleted or turned into a redirect. Kafziel Talk 13:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Notoriety noted with source as allaboutjazz.  -- Steve3849(talk) 07:19, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hang on
Talk:Científico

message: ke onda como asta la rasa  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.147.39.19 (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Estado

message: this is the english wikipedia. if we start defining foreign words, are we not opening a gigantic can of worms?Toyokuni3 (talk) 14:25, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: words like commune and arrondisement refer to specific types of political subdivisions in a specific country. this is simply the spanish translation of the english word 'state'. i could, myself, go and create entries for 'etat' (sorry i don't see the symbol here for the accented e) and 'staat'. others could create literally hundreds of pages translating this one word. it would quickly become unmanageable. we could have, i don't know, 40,000 -50,000 entries for each of the several thousand languages in the world.Toyokuni3 (talk) 16:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: English (?) Wikipedia
Talk:List of Spanish words of Nahuatl origin

message: tocayo-someone having the same name as you;
tocait'=name  +  yo(indicating that one possesses preceding thing)
clachar, tlachar- to look at something, mirar
tlachia=  mirar
pilmama- babysitter
pilli-child  +  mama- to carry
chachalaca- a mexican bird known for it's loud, raucus calling
chachalaco- a babbler, one who talks too much
chachalaca(in náhuat')= to talk excessively
(83.57.191.92 (talk) 15:11, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  tocayo, pilmama, clachar, chachalaca, chachalaco 
Talk:List of hispanophones

message: Hello everyone. There is at present a discussion going on at Hispanics in the United States, due to the request that the page be moved to Hispanic Americans. Would you like to comment please? Thank you. The Ogre 18:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hispanics in the United States - requested move 

message: I don't speak Spanish, but I understand that these are people who speak Spanish. Please tell me what "occupations are related with Spanish language" means?? That sounds like their occupations have something to do with the Spanish language, which makes no sense to me. If I've missed something, please excuse me and provide an explanation. Couldn't that be expressed more clearly? Or couldn't it simply be "Notable Spanish-speaking people"? Cresix (talk) 02:11, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Occupations are related with Spanish language?
Talk:Loísmo

message: This one:
:Loísmo can also seemingly change the meaning of certain phrases, since some verbs take on a different meaning based on the case of their objects. For example, le pegué means "I struck him", but a speaker with loísmo would say lo pegué, which means "I pasted/stuck him (onto something)" in dialects without loísmo.
The meaning is supposed to be different, yet the meaning is the same ("I struck him")???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.98.225.254 (talk) 13:42, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This paragraph doesn't make sense.
Talk:Piquerism

message: There's a lot to say on this topic, and what was here was pretty bad (it assumed the definition only covered self-inflicted wounds, which is a minor instance, really). I know it's not fully updated with sources yet, but I am working on it. Didn't recall what the template tag thingy was for actively being updated was, but others can edit while I work on it, so it's not like I need to warn people off while I pull things together. DreamGuy 05:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Updating
Talk:Organization of Ibero-American States

message: Member states of the Organization of Ibero-American States does not seem to be more than a reiteration of the subject of member states. BFG (talk) 19:02, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 21:18, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: Puerto Rico is shown on the map despite not being on the members page. Gruutor (talk) 18:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map error
Talk:Ramah Darom

message: See (and join) the discussion on the Camp Ramah talk page on this issue.  
Someone who has good reason for one form of transliteration over the other might make the appropriate change across all the Camp Ramah articles.  Right now they differ, and people are RVing each other (as on the Camp Ramah in California article page).  
Right now Camp Ramah publications use both forms of transliteration.  For example, eidah is used at , , and .  But edah is used at , , and .--Epeefleche 20:59, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Eidot or Edot?
Talk:Cumberland, Georgia

message: :Replaced non-free image with a free one.--JKeene (talk) 23:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Riverwood 200 - The project is only partially completed and largely hunks of dirt. Removing the image with sweeping rational across all projects that "they are probably completed already" is not appropriate. Especially if you don't know they are complete. Please leave rendering in place until project completed, including retail, then it can be replaced with a real picture, if deemed an important location (perhaps at that point, we should use the Braves stadium instead) Netdragon (talk) 06:44, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Rurales

message: Per WP:NOTDIC, since we should be covering things and not terms and this article covers two things, it seems like we should split this into two articles, one on the Guardia Rural and one on the Cuerpo de Defensa Rural. Thoughts? — Æµ§œš¹ [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 16:24, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Take a look at WP:CONSPLIT. This is a proposal to split because these are two separate topics, not because the article is getting too large. Both are notable and coverage so far seems neutral, but it's inappropriate to have one article covering different things just because they have the same name. — Æµ§œš¹ [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 17:23, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I am in favor of splitting. Amuseclio (talk) 00:00, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

text:  In support of splitting. Two different subjects. Creuzbourg (talk) 22:12, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Split?
Talk:Serrano pepper

message: On one hand, I'm very glad that we have cited many sources and done our research before adding the salmonella information to the page.  However... there is no way we need this many sources.  Even three refs from highly reputable sources seems to be plenty to confirm the issue.  I'm not going to change anything for now because I have not looked through the sources and don't know which ones are most suitable to keep.  This may also not be notable enough to remain after the scare is over.  If this information stays in the article though, you gotta cut down that source list.  Tegrenath (talk) 05:36, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed this by removing them all and citing the primary source (FDA website) instead.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Althena (talk • contribs) 12:26, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of sources

message: I have a package of  Burpee All Alarm Hot Pepper Mix ( UPC 0-41530-65016-7) that I'm growing. It would be very useful if this article would have more information regarding the serrano plant itself and not just the fruit.
Christopher, Salem, OR (talk) 05:48, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Plant vs Fruit

message: Capsicum annuum is written beside the name. What gives? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:02, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The Serrano is one variety of the 'Capsicum annuum' species of peppers. 66.87.4.116 (talk) 01:53, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Species name
Talk:Spanish exonyms

message: Vatican City is an indipendent state.--79.26.199.78 (talk) 10:52, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vatican City 

message: Who, other than their authors, looks at such pages?  What's the use of an endless list of examples of the obvious fact that each language adapts foreign words to its own phonology and orthography?  Why do we need a list of place-names in Spanish more than a list of Spanish words for spices or engine parts?  If you find such lists useful, please tell me how. —Tamfang (talk) 20:38, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Not all languages adapt.  For instance, when the Chinese government announced they were renaming their Northern Capital, freely known among the English-speaking peoples as Peking for at least 300 years, the English-speaking world immediately took as good the Chinese government edict and it is now rare not see Beijing in English, unless referring to certain historic proper names (University of Peking, etc., or other historic contexts).  In Spanish, conversely, it is recommended that the original name, Pekín or Pequín, remain in use.https://www.rae.es/dpd/Pek%C3%ADn XavierItzm (talk) 08:36, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not all languages adapt, as XaiverItzm says, and sometimes new city names are simply not honored for whatever other reason, historical and political being the strongest motivations. Examples each of those two: a) if Aachen were to become French instead of German, Spanish would still maintain the usage of the name "Aquisgrán" instead of "Aguas de la Capilla", as this word is derived directly from its Latin name Aquisgranum; b) during the time where Saint Petersburg was called Leningrad, Spanish language maintained the usage of "San Petersburgo" (although "Leningrado" was also seen). Mfarah (talk) 11:12, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  why?
Talk:Translations during the Spanish Golden Age

message: Shouldn't the title be something like "Translations during the Spanish Golden Age"?
"Spanish translation in the Golden Age" does not really make much sense. Unless anyone raises any objections I will proceed to rename it and to expand its contents.
--RafaelMinuesa (talk) 11:45, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Translations during the Spanish Golden Age
Talk:Vato

message: This page is a dictionary definition (something which Wikipedia is not).  It explains the meaning, etymology and usage examples of a foreign slang word.  I can't find any encyclopedic content on this page.  Nothing here rises past what I would expect to read in a truly great unabridged dictionary.  The definitions and usage discussions belong over in Wiktionary where folks with the right skills, interests and lexical tools can more easily sort out the meanings and origins.
Options to fix the page here include:
# Expand the page with encyclopedic content - that is, content that goes well beyond the merely lexical.
# Redirect the page to a more general page on the appropriate sub-genre of slang.
# Replace the current contents with a soft-redirect to Wiktionary (usually done using the  template).
# Replace the current contents with a disambiguation page referring to both the Wiktionary page and the other usages of this word.
Pending a better answer, I'm implementing option 4 for now.  Rossami (talk) 22:43, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand, merge or redirect
Talk:Cantigas de Santa Maria

message: I would like to add an external link from this article to the Cantigas de Santa Maria website at http://www.cantigasdesantamaria.com/ . This website is my own, so adding the link might be viewed unfavourably as a conflict of interest. However, the website is non-commercial, largely academic in conception though targeted at potential performers, and most importantly, is currently the only site on the web that has good quality, thoroughly proofread transcriptions of all of the Cantigas. (The Portuguese Wikisource texts are sufficiently broken to be of almost no use to performers, and significantly misleading to academics, as they are full of OCR errors and drop over 2500 accented letters—not just the accents, the letters too. The texts on the French site are the same, and appear to have a common origin.) If anybody would like to add a link themselves, that would be excellent. Otherwise I will add it myself if nobody has objected here by 31st July 2011. Acasson (talk) 18:54, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As there have been no objections, I'll add the link now and move the other, inaccurate transcriptions down the list. Acasson (talk) 12:58, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link to Cantigas de Santa Maria for Singers website 
Talk:Castrapo

message: * Well, I'm Galician and I'm desagree, castrapo is not used for the Spanish language with a heavy used of Galician vocabulary and syntax, it's used for the Galician with a heavy used of Spanish vocabulary and syntax (wich is often used in the cities), and that's the reason why the reintegrationists groups refer disapprovingly to the current standard form of Galician language as castrapo. Unfortunately, there are examples of castrapo in some Galician political leaders as the ex-president Emilio Pérez Touriño.
* No Spanish speaker would say Pecha a ventana (when using Spanish, of course), but most Galician speakers actually say that; and not only in cities, but also in rural areas (I'm from a small village, if that gives me some kind of authority :P). I mostly agree with the previous user, and I think this article is plainly wrong and should be rewritten. I'm not going to do it because my English is really bad, and the writer of this article would disagree with me, so it would probably be deleted. --79.156.79.206 (talk) 13:01, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: In the article on 'Comparison of Portuguese and Spanish, 'castrapo' is referred to as 'pejorative for Spanish-influenced Galician', i.e. it's a mangled form of Galician. There is then a link to this article, which says precisely the opposite: that 'castrapo' is 'the pejorative name for the form of the Spanish language spoken in the region of Galicia', i.e. it's a mangled form of Spanish. I don't know which statement is true, but they can't both be, and the above comments by a Galician-speaker on this talk page suggest that the latter is wrong. What's more, I would expect Spanish-speakers to use an insult that more specifically targets Galicia - 'castrapo', with its reference to Cas(tilian Spanish), suggests a term coined by Galician-speakers. In any case, someone who knows the truth of the matter should tidy up this inconsistency. Otherwise both passages should be deleted, since right now they contradict each other, and there's no point in giving contradictory information for Internet users to pass on. I've made a similar comment on the talk page for the other article.92.111.250.34 (talk) 18:01, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there's a contradiction between the statements; they are basically saying the same thing from different points of views. In fact, urban Galician has been so deeply influenced by Castilian (phonology, vocabulary, syntax) that the language spoken nowadays in Galician cities is an amalgam somewhere in-between the original Galician and modern Castilian. As for the origin of the word, to me it makes more sense to think that "castrapo" is used derogatorily by Spanish-speakers, but it could arguably be also used by people from the Reintegrationism movement, who defend the return to a "purer" Galician language. —capmo (talk) 04:04, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency with another Wikipedia article