lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:WLFF

message: I restored what I felt needed to be. A lot of information was taken out in previous revisions and shouldn't have been. I'll admit there should be better sources. It's not my fault the Sun News does a mediocre job covering radio. We're not allowed to use message boards as sources, so I can't say that the information came from there.
If I restored anything I shouldn't have, sorry.Vchimpanzee ·  talk · contributions · 18:27, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is a holy mess

message: There wasn't much here when I started working on it today.
I probably should have considered putting the information on the WSYN page. At the time I moved the original WSYN article here, I was thinking the WYAK article should become WSYN and that's why I did what I did. Then I discovered someone had put historical information about Sunny 106.5 on the WSYN page. When I moved it here, I also checked that person's contributions and he/she had also contributed here. Imagine my surprise to find so much content missing as I went through the history to find what else the person had done!
I restored nearly everything. It could be argued that it's not necessary to say Lou Krieger wasn't warned ahead of time. Then again, I don't recall a source for that. I didn't restore that because it almost sounded like a rant.
If there is no history of Sunny 106.5 here, this can't be much of an article. I don't think it should be the article about WYAK because of the call letter change.Vchimpanzee ·  talk · contributions · 19:52, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where should Sunny 106.5 information go? 

message: I removed the statement about the dispute with Citadel over using the name "The Wolf" because 1) there was no source and 2) Trademarks are issued by the US Patent and Trademark office, not the State of South Carolina.   Whatever the issue may have been, the text does not properly explain it or cite a reliable source.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 18:12, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Wolf" issue 

message: I didn't like the idea of splitting the information into WYAK (defunct) and WLFF, since WLFF would have little information. There isn't proof WYAK continued as WLFF, and someone told me to say otherwise is original research.Vchimpanzee ·  talk · contributions · 14:38, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: And we went and kept the history with the frequency anyway. I give up.— Vchimpanzee ·  talk · contributions · 19:53, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible split
Talk:Walter Suffield

message: Is there a strong rationale for using the page name "Walter Suffield"? I don't have a copy of Handbook of British Chronology to check, but the two cited webpages both refer to him as "Walter de Suffield".  I'm guessing you'll have a view. Thanks! -Stelio (talk) 16:11, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Just as much rationale for using "de Suffield". There really isn't a "right choice" with this period - they are used interchangeably. HBC does indeed use just the plain Suffield. The Actuary article isn't really in the field of history (the author is a "retired actuarial consultant"), so their usage isn't compelling. To help matters along - the ODNB uses "Walter of Suffield". (see here). So I don't see any real compelling reason to change the name ... it's pretty much evenly split among the choices. As long as there are redirects (which I didn't check on) ... we're fine. It really isn't that unusual to have this type of variation in names between sources. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:18, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Walter Suffield  vs. Walter de Suffield
Talk:WSM-FM

message: www.dickmcmahon.com/cliburn.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.115.195.215 (talk) 20:14, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

message: I just wanted to reach out to you all about a singer song writer friend of mine. I use to DJ in Cookeville tn with Gator and the stickman. moat of all I would like to have you give a listen sometime to Brad Richmonds song when you were mine. You can find it on Spotify.  It's a great song with the old culture of country. thanks for your time 174.79.110.184 (talk) 19:18, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  new singer song writer
Talk:HMS Ceres (D59)

message: I found an entry in Ceres ships logs that shows she was in port at Constantinople when Fox collided with her stern on 30 March rather than the previously reported (by The Times) date of 3 April.  I'm not sure if this info would be viewed as "original research"  but seeing as it is however the "correct information", I have changed it anyway; please feel free to put me in my place though.  LameCat (talk) 17:59, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Collision with USS ''Fox''

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Jack Frost (talk) 05:21, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Airi Suzuki (violinist)

message: I hate to quash anything, but I really doubt that this talented young violin student is notable enough quite yet for a wikipedia entry. Fifth place in the Wienawski is quite good, but.... in any case, I hope my deletion of the adjective "awesome" and the noun "success" will stand.Brozhnik (talk) 02:31, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Aja Kim

message: It is pretty amazing to me that some administrators have come on here and on The Iron Maidens and censored multiple editors adding information on the lawsuit by Aja Kim against the Iron Maidens.  Censoring information from public LA County court documents?  Really??  I hate to break it to you also, but the information is already all over the web, and on the front page of The Iron Maiden's website.  You all are protecting Aja Kim's effort to apparently cover this up, because she (or one of her agents) e-mailed Wikipedia?  Guys, how does that look??  76.89.129.139 (talk) 06:16, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Administrator actions
Talk:Al Cisneros

message: Several requests for permission made on the other pic. Al with Bass and purple background photo from source. No word back yet. That photo will supercede this one if and when permission is given and no other more suitable image of subject is presented here. --Phaedrx (talk) 07:20, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I just realized now (upon reading a chat transcript of my questions and answers at the help chat) that I myself have taken images of Mr. Cisneros at Bowery Ballroom Manhattan end of 2012. As author I would grant free use of a screenshot or outright photograph of subject as soon as I can contribute the final work (hours to days) if that is okay with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. That would supercede this photo or the other aforementioned purple backgound one which was apparently from Oregon Music News via artist/personal Facebook site probably maintained by a manager unreachable. Thanks. -- Phaedrx (talk) 04:02, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox Photo 
Talk:WWWX

message: The article does not explain why this radio station is notable.  Gamebuster19901 (Talk║Contributions) 16:07, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Because like every other FCC licensed radio station, it A) has a license B) exists in real life C) broadcasts to people, and do I really have to explain why a radio station is notable? Radio stations generally enjoy a degree of notability not the least of which because they are licensed by a government entity. I guess I fail to see how it is NOT notable? It has 17!!! references. Most radio station articles do not even have a 10th of that many. I would love to see a reason why this radio station gets singled out as not being notable. ḾỊḼʘɴίcả • Talk • I DX for fun! 02:57, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

text: I've removed the notability template. I believe at this point that notability through sources is now more than evident. I could at this point continue to comb newspapers.com if need be to provide even more contemporary sources about this station; there's plenty, and if notability is still in question, I probably will until the matter is laid to rest. Skybunny (talk) 17:28, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Bluse 41.223.132.199 (talk) 22:47, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:    

message: Ggjcd 103.204.209.122 (talk) 19:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fjdrhv 

message: 0356 7552 75 27.3.81.90 (talk) 18:36, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duong Thanh
Talk:Omaha Public Library

message: June 13, 1877 is the date the city of Omaha recognizes as the beginning of the Omaha Public Library for it is the date in which the library board was first appointed.  The library itself recognizes the Second Omaha Library Assocation as the Omaha Public Library and thus uses 1872 as the establishment date.  To reconcile the difference the Omaha Public Library has permission from the city of Omaha to use 1872.  Promotional material for the library use 1872.
Nice or in evil (talk) 20:14, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 1872 vs 1877

message: I have found references to two branches Elmwood (actually 2 locations for this) and Lotis in a 1945 promotional pamplet for the Omaha Public Library.  Until I can find out more information, their inclusion in the former locations table will be incomplete. Nice or in evil (talk) 18:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Elmwood and Lotis Branches
Talk:Winchester Model 1892

message: Removed erroneous line claiming the 1892 was "much like" the '66, '73, and '76: Browningt's designs in fact had very little in common with Winchester's earlier Henry-derived toggle-link actions.  The '92 was a smaller '86, with an improved feed mechanism.Solicitr (talk) 02:11, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision
Talk:2007 Dally M Awards

message: I remember reading somewhere that Sonny Bill won it, and lost it by being suspended twice in the season. Is it verifiable/is it notable?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.208.196.19 (talk) 10:49, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've heard it, in various places, newspapers, The Footy Show etc. But it's not verifiable, not unless the Dally M people make an official announcement. SpecialWindler  talk () 11:01, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SR of year
Talk:1953 Masters Tournament

message: Some sources like http://golfmajorchampionships.com/year?year=1953&tournament=1 and https://www.golfstats.com/search/?yr=1953&tour=&tournament=Masters&submit=go have Frank Stranahan's first round as 73. Other sources like the Majors of Golf have it as 72. Contemporary sources give 72 (eg https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=AcdRAAAAIBAJ&sjid=iWoDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5408%2C3620515), so I'm assuming 72 is correct. This means that we should have 2xT14 and 5xT16 rather than 14 and 6xT15. Mostly we conform to this anyway. However: In 1953 Masters Tournament#Past champions in the field Sam Snead is T16 but in Sam Snead#Results timeline we had T15. I have changed similar errors elsewhere. Being an amateur this error had no effect on prize money. Nigej (talk) 13:31, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stranahan score 

message: More differences for Robert Sweeny Jr. 300 or 298 and Dick Chapman 300 or 299. 2xT34, 8xT36 becomes 3xT34, 37, 6XT38. Nigej (talk) 18:07, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  More differences
Talk:Alan Gowling

message: Gowling had been selected for the Great Britain Olympic squad while still a student. In order not to lose his amateur status and therefore be disqualified from the Olympic games, he first signed for  Manchester United as an amateur, only signing a professional contract after the Great Britain team's elimination.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thermosoverfil (talk • contribs) 11:06, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vienna Stadtbahn

message: This article contains several rather confusing references to the Stadtbahn being called light rail back in the 19th century. For example:
:In 1869, Baurat Baron Carl von Schwarz finally brought in a third "light rail design". Thus, a name was fixed for the project, which soon became commonplace. In addition, the term "light rail" at the latest in 1872 in Berlin was common. Outside the two capitals, however, "Stadtbahn" established itself at the end of the 19th century rather as an alternative name for a classic electric tram. In Vienna, as well as in Berlin, one therefore spoke in the 19th century partly of a city railway.
It seems to me vanishingly unlikely that anybody in the 19th century German speaking Vienna would refer to anything using the term light rail, which is very much a late 20th century English language term. Unfortunately the article isn't sourced, but as best I can tell this is likely an artifact of machine translation. People in 19th century called it the Stadtbahn, which to them simply meant the City Railway. But because of the subsequent use of that term in some German cities to mean 'tramways upgraded with underground sections', Google Translate and/or other tools now translate this as light rail. Before I attempt to fix this confusion, does anybody disagree with this reading. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 20:33, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I've convinced myself that this is correct. I will make the necessary changes. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 18:07, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Term 'light rail' 

message: The map currently at the head of this article dates from the 1930s and shows only the lines that were electrified and operated by tram-like vehicles, and which are now essentially part of the U-Bahn (plus a few abandoned bits). But the adjacent header text talks about part of the Stadtbahn being now U-Bahn and part S-Bahn, which is confusing until you realise that the map doesn't show the Stadtbahn at its full extent. And you have to read several pages of history before that sinks in. It would be much better if we had a header map showing the system at is full extent, rather than after it had started to contract. Does anybody know of, or can make, such a map. Obviously it would need to meet copyright requirements. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 11:55, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does anybody know of a useable map of the Stadtbahn at its full extent
Talk:Ralph Coates

message: The article should mention he was selected in England's preliminary squad for the 1970 World Cup, but was omitted from the final 22. Piaecantiones (talk) 20:26, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a reliable source we can use to verify such information? If so, please feel free to add the content to the article yoursekf - Wikipedia is available for everyone to edit! GiantSnowman 03:12, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Cup 
Talk:Susana Miller

message: The term milonguero-style was introduced by Birkit Wildenburg (Biki) in the Netherlands. Only after the specific tangostyle of Pedro Rusconi, better known as Tete, got introduced by this name, Susanna Miller (who learned this style from Tete) started to use this term. The style itself is based on a very traditional tango de salon style, were they dance chest to chest beacause of the crowded milongs. But it was Tete in combination with Maria at the time (1989), who started to dance with one axis, not only touching with the chests, but leaning againts each other. It was that style, that Biki learned from Tete himself, that was named milonguero-style.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.83.3.177 (talk) 13:22, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Love's Last Shift

message: What is curious about this play is the introduction of malapropisms...Sir Novelty Fashion changed the letter 'a' to 'o' as an affectation. In 'The Relapse' Sir Navelty is promoted to the House of Lords but is rather concerned that his brother, Tom has committed suicide and sadly announces 'Ahhh, dear Tam, shat himself through the head'.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.179.94.17 (talk) 10:23, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Curious

message: Hello. I'm leaving this on your talk and the article page, as I'm not sure where's best. The play definitely refers to conventions of Restoration comedy, but it's significance lies in being the first of the new genre of sentimental comedy. It is described as such in The Cambridge Guide to Theatre. Unless there's a better, more specific citation than that, I think that ought to define its genre. I've read this together with The Relapse, though I confess it was a while ago, and placing the two together makes the distinction clear. 
DionysosProteus 21:35, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, thanks for communicating. Well, I know of more specialized discussions than the Cambridge Guide, it's sort of my field. (I wrote the articles on The Relapse and Love's Last Shift.) I don't agree about the "sentimental comedy," but I don't exactly feel strongly about it, either. I'll see if I can find the time and, uh, momentum to fix up some nice citation for my opinion. In the meantime, please feel free to revert my revert right back, if you like. We should probably post any further discussion on the article talk, where other people can find it. Regards,  Bishonen | talk 22:11, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre question
Talk:Flanagan Island

message: I could find nothing on the Internet to support the article's assertion that both the U.S. and the BVI claim this island. The World Factbook does not include it in its list of the U.S.' border disputes. --A. B. (talk •  contribs)  23:16, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll try and dig something up.  It is not like there was ever a war over them, but each side always claim that the island belongs to them - Wikimaps seems to have "awarded" it to the BVI (yay!), but if you look at other online maps they regard it as USVI territory.  Physical maps produced in the two different territories follow the party line in each territory.  If I can't do anything better I will try and find a couple of physical government maps and scan them in.  I think it all dates from the annexation of St John by the Danes in 1718 (see generally: History_of_the_BVI#Geographical_limits_of_the_Territory).  But I'll try and source the statement.--Legis (talk - contribs) 17:17, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Still looking into this - I got hold of the first official survey of the British Virgin Islands conducted by Thomas Jeffreys (Geographer to the King) on 20 February 1775, and he ascribes the island as a Danish territory (which would make it part of the modern USVI).  But saldy, he also indicates that Great Thatch, Little Thatch, Great Tobago and Little Tobago are all Danish possessions, and they were at the time (and have always been since, without dispute) British possessions.  So I am not sure if that takes us further forwards or not... --Legis (talk - contribs) 16:18, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

text: I think the U.S. vs British argument has now been definitively resolved (although it looks like Google Earth still has it wrong!) - it belongs to the Yanks.  Funnily enough, I checked this at the BVI Land Registry the other day, which confirmed that it does not register titles for Flanagan.  Bu I could not think of a way to "cite" that as a source!  Anyhow, glad it got resolved, and better yet somebody produced a reliable 3rd party source to resolve it. --Legis (talk - contribs) 20:39, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: disputed border?
Talk:AmpliFIND

message: these links are all [HTTP 300 class redirects]. the one surviving open source project seems to be  and they have the same issue i do . :V --Rektide (talk) 00:53, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The Music Brainz Wiki states that "In June 2011, the intellectual property of AmpliFIND was sold to Gracenote."
http://musicbrainz.org/doc/AmpliFIND_Music_Services  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.142.247.23 (talk) 08:31, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  AmpliFIND sold? 

message: Please look into this
50.29.136.170 (talk) 23:28, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  AcoustID to replace Amplifind for MusicBrainz Picard 
Talk:Alberto (footballer, born 1975)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: No consensus to move   (t · c) buidhe 03:28, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Alberto Luiz de Souza →  – WP:COMMONNAME - the player is known primarily as simply 'Alberto', not by his full name. The current redirect to Alberto Moreno doesn't make much sense anyways. Paul Vaurie (talk) 16:19, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:18, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 July 2021
Talk:Bodhisattva vow

message: It seems that the English translation differs somewhat from the Chinese one.  The English translation misses the essence of the Chinese version, where despite endless passions, one vows to remove them all.  The English translation here, different than what I usually see, puts the vow at the beginning of the sentence, de-emphasizing the challenge somehow. Maybe it's just me, but I'd like to see us move to a more traditional translation somehow.  It's longer, so perhaps the author was hoping to save space.  :)
--Ph0kin (talk) 15:25, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with English translation 

message: Maybe they can be helpful to the article. THE BODHISATTVA VOWS taken from two weekends’ teachings given by Geshe Tashi in February and March 2001 at Jamyang Buddhist Centre, London, BODHISATTVA VOWS, The Bodhisattva Vow, Bodhisattva Vows by Taitaku Pat Phelan,
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.212.107 (talk) 13:03, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Austerlitz -- 88.75.212.107 (talk) 13:12, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

text: Austerlitz -- 88.75.212.107 (talk) 13:18, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some more links 
Talk:Alcathous

message: The accompanying multi-stub article seems to have developed from an article on Alcathous, son of Pelops that was broadened into a multi-stub, then cut-&-paste split to create  Alcathous, son of Pelops, then further broadened by expansion of the "Alcathous, son of Aesyetes" coverage to abt 4 lines and of the "Alcathous, son of Porthaon" entry to abt 2 lines. I expect it will be feasible to divide the history to properly attribute the content of the article that's already been split off, and that at least a fair job can be done to do the same for stubs Alcathous, son of Aesyetes and Alcathous, son of Porthaon. I'm not going to tag the multi-stub article "in use" before studying the structure of the history, but i hope anyone with a sudden motivation to add to it will hold off for a day or two to keep from complicating the situation further. TIA.--Jerzy•t 06:37, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of the article 
Talk:Icchantika

message: Becareful when reading this entry! Apparently, this page was created by or a follower of Tony Page who tried to use Wikipedia to spread his individual views about Mahayana Buddhism. Just compare this with the german version that is much better!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.9.157.118 (talk) 13:34, 6 May 2013 (UTC)