lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Valentine

message: The sources used are pretty well all self-referential, and it would do well to have Wikipedia:Verifiability applied. The references would also be useful to be inline for assistance see Wikipedia:inline citation — billinghurst sDrewth 00:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article requires other verifiable sources 

message: This article has a LOT of problems, but its subject is notable and worthwhile. I've reached out to a couple of subject matter experts. If they are cooperative, together we can fix the problems with the article. Give us at least a few days. Lou Sander (talk) 15:16, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is now 87% better after including several references / reliable sources. MPS (talk) 19:33, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewriting the article 

message: User: CorporateM recentlly deleted ALL subsections in the history section, but I reverted because I am of the opinion that subsection headers adds clarity to the history. I looked at a couple other museum articles and some of them seem to have quite extensive history sections... examples: Solomon_R._Guggenheim_Museum#History & Denver_Art_Museum#History_of_the_museum ... I am not saying that wiki policy demands subsections, but I think it is good form to have subsections if the history section of the article is very long. Thoughts? Peace MPS (talk) 16:30, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  History sub-Sections
Talk:Buffett

message: The merge of Buffet (disambiguation) to this page has been made twice. It should not be made again. Per MoS:DP, "Pages only listing persons with certain given names or surnames who are not widely known by these parts of their name otherwise are not disambiguation pages". Putting people on a disambig page is also in opposition to WP:D#Lists.
This is a surname article, and a disambig page (which is a non-article) should not be merged with it. Even if they were both dab pages, there is enough room for confusion between buffet and buffett that we do not need to add to it by intermixing them on the same page. Chris the speller 14:55, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merges of Buffet (disambiguation) to this page; no more, please
Talk:The Snout in the Dark

message: I've removed the link to Wikisource as it currently does not have The Snout in the Dark. Brent Krajewski (talk) 20:42, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikisource
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Floaterfluss 2

message: User:Floaterfluss
      run at Tue Sep 25 15:05:17 2007 GMT
Category:		5
Image:			30
Mainspace		1212
Talk:			86
Template:		5
User talk:		58
User:			198
Wikipedia talk:		8
Wikipedia:		30
avg edits per page	1.57
earliest	23:15, 4 November 2006
number of unique pages	1040
total			1632
2006/11 	524 	
2006/12 	89 	
2007/1 	376 	
2007/2 	80 	
2007/3 	135 	
2007/4 	7 	
2007/5 	6 	
2007/6 	19 	
2007/7 	4 	
2007/8 	48 	
2007/9 	344 	
Mainspace
31	Outcesticide
20	Kurt Cobain
16	Dog.House
15	Fingernails (album)
14	Mitchell Johnson (murderer)
11	Sappy
9	Maynard James Keenan
7	Kill screen
7	Walter Day
6	Sliver: The Best of the Box
6	Eric H. du Plessis
6	V-2 No. 13
6	Raunchola
5	Do Re Mi (Nirvana song)
5	Right in Two
Talk:
6	10,000 Days
3	Arvid Noe
3	Paleoconservatism
3	New antisemitism
3	Maraba Coffee
3	Goatse.cx
2	Sale of Shin Corporation to Temasek Holdings
2	World War I
2	Irukandji jellyfish
2	Kanab ambersnail
2	Canceled Superman films
2	2003 Arkansas vs. Kentucky football game
2	Outcesticide
2	2007 Iranian seizure of Royal Navy personnel
2	Main Page
Category:
2	Nirvana B-sides
Image:
2	Russian Noblewoman - 1905.JPG
Template:
3	Toolband
User:
68	Floaterfluss
34	Floaterfluss/List of vandalism
26	Floaterfluss/List of articles
17	Floaterfluss/List of redirects
8	Floaterfluss/Popular articles
6	Floaterfluss/Best of Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
4	Floaterfluss/List of files
4	Floaterfluss/Close calls
4	Floaterfluss/monobook.js
3	Floaterfluss/Unicode
2	Floaterfluss/List of 4chan memes
2	Floaterfluss/Pages
2	Nakamura/Unicode
2	Floaterfluss/test
 	 
User talk:
29	Floaterfluss
3	DerHexer
3	WesleyDodds
2	C.Fred
2	208.144.114.xxx
Wikipedia:
8	Requests for adminship/Floaterfluss (2)
4	Requests for adminship/Floaterfluss
2	Introduction
2	Village pump (policy)
2	Articles for deletion/Übersite
2	Featured picture candidates/Joseph Kittinger's skydive
2	Requests for adminship
Wikipedia talk:
6	How to fix your signature
2	Special:Longpages
User contributions using  wannabe kate tools. Carlosguitar 15:07, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of people of Albanian origin

message: This list was created instead disturbing List of Albanians by adding famous people of Albanian origin. --Albanau 15:07, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Is it acceptable to use another non-English language to explain why certain people in the Croatian section are notable in the English Wikipedia?  I cannot understand what has been written. DJE (talk) 11:59, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of non-English in descriptions of Croats of Albanian Origin in English Wikipedia
Talk:Durbin and Greenbrier Valley Railroad

message: I don't know why this page was instantly marked for speedy deletion.  I've created stubs for other railroad-related entities before without any problems. n2xjk 15:37, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *I added two external links to WVDOT material relating to the railroad.  n2xjk 17:44, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Tranquilizer dart

message: "A tranquilizer dart is a dart-like projectile"
Why not a tire is a tire shaped object?
Jesus.
172.133.177.172 15:21, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Circular Reasoning

message: *I'd really like to know how one of these works and perhaps see a photo or two on this page ... Is it a syringe built into a dart? ... Is it spring loaded? ... How does it inject its contents into the target when it hits it? ... How does the dart "know" when it hit the target? ... Are they refillable, or are they a one-time-use kind of thing? ... How big are the darts? - Those kind of things
*I'm sure there are people that use Wikipedia that have experience with tranquilizer darts and guns, I would imagine every zoo has to have some of these as well as the many veterinary doctors and other animal control personnel that would have access, training and experience with these darts … We've seen enough of these in the movies, let’s see what they are really all about! - Ukt-zero (talk) 02:16, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: How does it work?
Talk:Juniperus semiglobosa

message: The plant on photo is not J. semiglobosa. This species never forms such prostrate shrubs like this. Vojtěch Zavadil (talk) 09:54, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong photo 
Talk:5000 meters

message: From the article:
:The 5K is the standard distance for high school cross country.
I've tagged this as needing a citation for two reasons. Firstly, the obvious one - that it doesn't currently have a citation! And secondly, that I hope it will remind editors that "high school" and "US high school" are not necessarily the same thing! Loganberry (Talk) 15:30, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  High school
Talk:Aston Martin DBR4

message: Salvadori & Trintignant were both in this race, which seems to be omitted from the text and the results table.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.213.39 (talk) 19:27, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, because they were driving the DBR5, not the DBR4. Different car with a different Wikipedia entry: Aston Martin DBR5. Pyrope 21:05, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course! Many thanks :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.213.39 (talk) 11:32, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  1960 British Grand Prix
Talk:Second Franco-Dahomean War

message: Legion is part of the French army, no need to separate it from France. I deleted Legion icon.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.190.97.85 (talk) 11:57, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Belligerents 

message: I understand that France was a global empire at this point and was much more technologically advanced than the small kingdom, but Dahomey was armed with (at the time) modern weapons and had a vast numerical advantage. Was Béhanzin just a bad commander? Was it France's Napoleonic battlefield strategies that gave them a decisive victory? Is there anywhere I can read up on this? Other African states such as the Waddai, Serer, and Wassoulou gave the French a much harder time before being conquered. 2601:18F:600:D40:E0CD:65B:AAAE:F88C (talk) 17:54, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How did the Dahomeans fail so badly?
Talk:Lennar Corporation

message: I added some sources to the page. I believe he is notable as he presided over the expansion of Lennar Corporation, making it the 3rd largest homebuilder in the USA. In addition, he has made significant charitable contributions including a $100 million donation to the University of Miami.Patapsco913 (talk) 00:52, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Stuart A. Miller]]

message: This article should be restored to this version: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lennar_Corporation&oldid=804343288
A lot of relevant information was cut from it, and because the overall size of the edit was similar to the previous file size is it possible that this massive change was overlooked?  Any and all critical information was cut out, and the article is now nothing more than an ugly massive timeline (not formatted correctly) with a bunch of completely irrelevant information that reads like it came straight from Corporate HQ.  Nothingbeforeus (talk) 08:56, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was this article completely changed by an anonymous user in October 2017?
Talk:Neotectonics

message: While browsing the web for writing the new Coast Range Geomorphic Province article, I noticed the "Center for Neotectonic Studies" and was surprized to learn that wikipedia has no article for a whole discipline, so I filled the gap. Laudak 15:58, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article life

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/neotectonics. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Opalzukor (talk) 09:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible [[WP:COPYVIO]]
Talk:Geoffrey Appleyard

message: See Wikipedia:Citing sources for info on how to properly cite references so that they can be easily verified by other editors. -- Cosmo0 15:55, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Cooper T51

message: I found an image that has been posted three times on various car forums and on facebook. It is of a T51 being driven on a public road. Car number 18. Looks to be taken on a highway in Southern California. 
Would be cool to know more about this car.
http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/t114/dog427435/1218%20ashbridge/99020Cooper20T51.jpg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wdstrongjr (talk • contribs) 14:01, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid that Wikiepdia isn't really the place for this. This is a noticeboard specifically for discussing the article itself, not the subject of the article. To me it looks like one of the T51s that were converted to run with a Maserati 250 engine, but you really should take this to a proper racing discussion site such as Ten-Tenths or the Autosport Nostalgia Forum. Pyrope 14:38, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: T51 on the road
Talk:Coast Range Geomorphic Province

message: I created this article to fill a red link in my new article Monta Vista Fault. Laudak 16:01, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article life
Talk:Powder puff

message: I created this page to fill a red link in my new stub Compact (cosmetics). Laudak 16:08, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article life

message: characteristics is spelt wrongly currently reads 'caharcteristics'  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.171.40.130 (talk) 10:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  misspelt 

message: Is there a need for a nude in this article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.89.247.202 (talk) 23:02, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: While I have nothing against the pictures on the grounds of nudity in and of itself especially since Wikipedia is not censored, I do have to agree that the nude photo may not be the best representation of a powder puff inn use. It would be better to have a photo of a woman sitting at a makeup table using a powder puff as that is more common. I imagine that photo was chosen since it in the public domain due to it's age but I think something more representative of how most woman appear when using puff would be better. --67.101.218.192 (talk) 17:59, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture Choice
Talk:Cotoletta

message: It is an Italian dish, source trace it in the Middle Ages 82.54.44.31 (talk) 17:40, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not according to this article. If you have a reliable source that says otherwise please do provide a citation to it.-- Srleffler (talk) 23:28, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Costoletta  

message: I'm thinking about merging this article with Breaded cutlet, but wanted to gather opinions first. As currently written, this article violates WP:NOTDICT. The lead sentence "Cotoletta ... is an Italian word for a veal breaded cutlet." defines the topic of the article as a word, contrary to policy. The topic that word denotes is covered by a different article. Therefore, this article should be merged there. The only reason for this article to exist as a separate article would be if there were some distinction between a cotoletta and other types of veal cutlet. Anyone want to advance an argument that that is the case? If not, I'll proceed with the merger.-- Srleffler (talk) 23:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind. After further reading I decided that this topic merits its own article. I rewrote the introduction to avoid the WP:NOTDICT issues.--Srleffler (talk) 23:26, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger?
Talk:Uncaged Campaigns

message: This is a new article that is still under construction...please don't delete yet until I can complete info on this charity. Thanks. Darkieboy236 16:20, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see plenty of sources here to establish notability and have declined the speedy.--Chaser - T 17:42, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Thank you for that.  I am going to add more info and more references over the next week or so to further substantiate this charity. Darkieboy236 18:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Annus Mirabilis (poem)

message: why cant i find any help about Annus Mirabilis by philip larkin??????????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.194.144.163 (talk • contribs) 
:Wikipedia's not about helping with work etc, it's an encyclopedia, it can't tell yew what to put in ywr exams :P try a different website ^_^ --MrMetalFLower 17:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Is this page supposed to be an article about a poem or a disambiguation of 2 poems? If either is notable, then they deserve to have a separate article of their own with a hatnote for disambig. But having an article on two different poems that share the same name is a bit of a... I don't really know the term. Mrathel (talk) 17:57, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambig 

message: I have changed this article into one about the Dryden poem. Even if two poems share the same name, they deserve to have separate articles providing they are both notable. The text for the Larkin poem is a copyrite violation, since the poem is not available under free-use policy. The Larkin information, if enough can be collected to assert notability, should be created as Annus Mirabilis (Larkin) or something of the sort, and a disambig can be placed at the top of the page. 
:secondly, this article needs references and sources to meet with the notability guides. I am not arguing that either poem is not notable, but without references, the article fails verifiability. Mrathel (talk) 18:39, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with removing the Larkin content, as aside from the copyright violation there wasn't much being said. Instinctively I feel that Larkin poem had probably accumulated enough notability to deserve its own page, but in without any sources to hand I think that that can happily wait. almost-instinct 03:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Changed Article

message: There is problem.
Annus Mirabilis does not really mean the year of miracles but something more like the marvellous year. Accordingly all this bloatage in the lead is inappropriate because the title is ironic. But I have no sources. Untitled50reg (talk) 18:17, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have since given the poem a skimread and I now care nothing about Dryden nor his title. Give me no heed. Untitled50reg (talk) 22:44, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead
Talk:Seal of Dartmouth College

message: I've decided to recreate this page following some discussions at Dartmouth College's FAC.
I nominated this article for deletion on December 21, 2006: the consensus was to merge it into Dartmouth College. However, the content proved too long to be kept in its full form at that article, which is a shame because it is both well-written and well-cited.
There was only one "Delete" vote at the AfD in addition to my nomination; all the other recommendations were to Keep or Merge the content. In recreating this article, my feelings on its encyclopedic value have obviously changed, and I hereby rescind my nomination of it for deletion, if only after the fact.
Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion explains the exception to something being "recreation of deleted content" as follows:
Since this content was moved to my and Smith120bh's user pages and never deleted, I believe in good faith that its replacement here does not constitute the recreation of deleted material. I realize, too, that this a grey area, so if anyone has concerns about this, please feel free to discuss them with me. Kane5187 16:22, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recreation 

message: I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of October 21, 2007, compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?: Reads well, clear, concise wording.
:2. Factually accurate?: 8 cites to WP:RS sources.
:3. Broad in coverage?: Though the article is a bit short, I'm not going to not pass it as a GA simply for that reason, with all of its other Good qualities.  However, if you do find other sources, please don't hesitate to expand it.  Also, please merge small paragraphs of 2 sentences or less in the History and revisions section.
:4. Neutral point of view?: Phrased in neutral wording throughout.
:5. Article stability? Article has only been up in present format for little over a month.  No edit wars, or talk page incivility during that time.
:6. Images?: Three, one with a detailed fair use rationale, and two from Wikimedia Commons.  Nice.
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. 
— Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 23:17, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Successful [[Wikipedia:Good articles|good article]] nomination

message: Thanks for adding the excellent photos, Dylan.  One can also spy versions of the seal in Alumni Hall, the Treasure Room, and on the front of Baker Tower.
Here is a mystery that someone should track down the answer to: where is Dartmouth storing the large stained glass seal that used to fill the main skylight over the stairs in Parkhurst Hall?  It was removed in a renovation a few years ago and has not been put back.
:--Dartmothian (talk) 20:06, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos
Talk:ECTS grading scale

message: I have taught for almost 30 years at a Swedish university and can say that what is missing from this article is the inherent problem caused by the fact that the ECST is a relative scale and that scores in Sweden are absolute. This is, in general, the main problem with the ECTS (grading system). 
"Relative" in the sense that only a certain percentage of students can get the best grade, regardless of how much they learn and how good they perform relative to the learning objectives/course requirements. In such a system each student will strive to end up in a class with poor class mates (that will perform worse) and will not benefit from cooperating with other class mates for increased mutual learning. The individual can not fully predict what the final grade will be based only on his or her own achievement. 
"Absolute" in the sense that everyone that meets the formal requirements for a certain grade also gets this grade (which could mean that all fail or all get the best grade possible - neither of which happens in reality). In such a system each student strive to end up in a class with good class mates with whom cooperation would be beneficial. The result is solely in the hands of the individual. 
The same fundamental problem exists in all EU countries where grades are not relative.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.125.173 (talk) 06:05, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impossible to implement in Sweden among other countries 

message: Hello,
Is there a source for the “definitions” of the grades in the 2003 ECTS grading system? (‘A’ meaning “outstanding performance with only minor errors”; ‘B’ meaning “above the average standard but with some errors”; etc.). I guess this is merely a way that some contributor found to make the system of division into subgroups clearer to the reader; however, one might find that such “definitions” would contradict the official recommendation of not using words like “excellent” or “good”... Remsirems (talk) 16:15, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of the ECTS grades (2003 grading scale) 
Talk:Snow bridge

message: While idly looking into the "Recent changes" log, I noticed that an IP joker created the page Talk:Snow bridge with a stupid remark. Next minute or two it was deleted. I was, like, wow!, swift justice. While this talk page was blank, in edit mode it contained a line saying that it was deleted  because it was "talk page of nonexisting page" or something like that. (I don't see this line anymore. why?) This deletion record made me wondering on two issues: why the article was missing and why the IP joker vandalized the talk page rather than the article itself. I checked the  deletion log and saw that the article was never created, meaning that the joker IP could not simply click at the "discussion" tag to leave a stupid comment. What is more Talk:Snow bridge, was not wikilinked to anywhere Therefore this IP joker was qualified enough to open a talk page in a way more complicated than a simple mouse click. So I gather this IP simply decided to make a tricky test of wikipedia. Well, admins were on guard this time. And, since the article itself was missing, I happily started it. Laudak 16:36, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article life