lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Psychopathia Sexualis (disambiguation)

message: Why is the main name space the disambiguation page when virtually all references are to the book or some offshoot/reference of the book? The book's article should be here and the disambiguation page should be at the standard (disambiguation) title. DreamGuy 20:34, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree on that. The book is a very famous one, and most of the other meanings probably refer to Krafft-Ebing's work. Currently Psychopathia Sexualis (book) redirects to a section in the article on the author, but I don't see that as a problem especially as the book might well be lifted out to its own article in the future. I'll move the disambig page. // habj (talk) 07:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation at main name

message: Tassedethe, you stated, "no clear primary topic." This is not true. Like an editor stated above, "virtually all references are to the book or some offshoot/reference of the book." This is still true. A simple Google search shows that the Richard von Krafft-Ebing book is the primary topic. We can see this on regular Google, on Google Books, and on Google Scholar. The Psychopathia Sexualis (film) article is even based on Richard von Krafft-Ebing material. You should revert your move. That, or at WP:Requested moves, I will request that the page is moved back.  Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 22:31, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Flyer22 Reborn. I moved it as there had been multiple moves in the past. Before I moved things the Psychopathia Sexualis page redirected to the page Psychopathia Sexualis (book) while there was a separate book at Psychopathia Sexualis (Heinrich Kaan). So I corrected the ambiguously titled pages to Psychopathia Sexualis (Richard von Krafft-Ebing book) and Psychopathia Sexualis (Heinrich Kaan book). I'm happy to undo moves but not to the previous sitaution. If your assertion of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC is correct then the moves would be to revert this page to Psychopathia Sexualis (disambiguation) and then move Psychopathia Sexualis (Richard von Krafft-Ebing book) to Psychopathia Sexualis (not to Psychopathia Sexualis (book)). If that suits please let me know. Tassedethe (talk) 23:03, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Tassedethe, at  WP:Requested moves, I noted that "Psychopathia Sexualis (Richard von Krafft-Ebing book)" should be moved to "Psychopathia Sexualis." Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:09, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:Primary topic]]
Talk:American Music Club

message: I added mention of the great Mark Eitzel-sung single by the Cowboys, recorded in Ohio.  One side is available on Killed by Death #5; both are outrageously great!  Might follow up with the Naked Skinnies as soon as I can FIND their single!  Their page is just a stub; AMC's needs expanding!  C'mon; all you little Bukowskis out there oughta be swingin' for this one.  76.27.232.185 (talk) 18:51, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:An Act Recognizing the Equality of the Two Official Linguistic Communities in New Brunswick

message: This article should be re-named "Bill 88," the far more common name for this piece of legislation in English. "Law 88" is essentially a poor translation of the common French name for it, "Loi 88." Arthurmeighan 20:41, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

message: This article needs to be expanded. Additional information on the political controversy around the legislation, the process of entrenching the legislation in the constitution (including reference to the Meech Lake and Charlottetown Accords), and linguistic confrontation in New Brunswick (with reference to the Confederation of Regions Party) should all be included. Arthurmeighan 20:47, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements 

message: I have assessed this as a Stub Class, as it only gives the basic information on the topic. I have assessed this as low importance, as I do not feel that many readers would be familiar with the subject of the article, and it is a localized topic. Cheers, CP 23:54, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Raised to Start class, and changed its importance to 'mid' because this makes NB the only legally bilingual province.  Regards, PKT(alk) 16:20, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Europe

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:July 1757 heatwave#Requested move 24 August 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Lightoil (talk) 14:18, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:July 1757 heatwave#Requested move 24 August 2023]] 

message: Hello WikiProject Europe: 
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a  month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts. 
We hope to see you there!
Grnrchst (talk) 14:04, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women in Green's 5th Edit-a-thon 

message: There is a requested merge discussion at Talk:Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine#Merge_discussion that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Dan the Animator 22:25, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion at [[Talk:Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine#Merge_discussion]] 

message: Link: Talk:Second Cold War#Map of NATO. George Ho (talk) 20:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map of NATO discussed at [[Talk:Second Cold War]]
Talk:Tournoi de Paris

message: The dates in that table need to be english. --ST47Talk·Desk 20:44, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Come (British band)

message: I say Delete.  I've added info on this project to the section on Whitehouse (band), to which it was a precursor.  The project itself doesn't really have enough of a history to stand up as it's own article.Jonnyeol (talk) 22:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I feel there's worth in keeping the page as it can serve as a specific node of information on the band for other services and apps that draw artist info details from. i've updated it with a few links, and maybe there's more info/images from out there to come. --MilkMiruku (talk) 04:36, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:A Chorus of Disapproval (film)

message: The article had had a notability tag since July 10th, and indeed the punk band the article was related to seemed utterly unnotable. For one thing, the name of the person starting the article is the same as the alias for the band mentioned in the article. The movie I'm changing this article to seems much more notable, having a couple of really big stars on its cast list. I don't know the movie, however, so all I can make of it is a stub. Hopefully, someone can expand. If someone disagrees and thinks that the punk band is actually notable, we should try and find out what to do. Either start a new article called A Chorus of Disapproval (band) in which to copy the old article into; or a new article called A Chorus of Disapproval (film) and copy the present article into, restoring this page back to the band article; or create both those two new articles and make this a disambiguation page. I recommend we discuss it here first before starting a lot of back-and-forth editing. Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • &site=  count) 20:49, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Changed article focus
Talk:Luxembourg Stock Exchange

message: This is positioned next to St. Paul's Cathedral on Google Maps.... I have no idea how to fix it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.194.32.42 (talk) 17:04, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  Sorry, that was a copy+paste error on my part (from the London Stock Exchange infobox, obviously). Bastin 17:50, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates
Talk:44 Magnum (band)

message: I thought that I would never be the one to do this, because when I originally made this article I intended for people within the projects to help me on it because obviously I don't know how to read Japanese which is what most site languages would be. I just looked at their discography and time they formed which looked like a prime band from the time period, they released a live album and live video indicating they have toured most likely in their home country. Just please take a look at their discography they have released 6 albums and some other releases and have reformed. I was surprised when I even saw the deletion tag on this article because the ip who did, I get the hunch that he is following me but editing some articles outside the box with similar ips to show that "he's not following me". I am really on a wikibreak but I wanted to make sure this article didn't get deleted without any thought. --CircafuciX (talk) 14:30, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Swirlies

message: I propose that Trollin Withdrawal be merged into Swirlies. I think that the content in the Trollin Withdrawal article can easily be explained in the context of Swirlies, and the Swirlies article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of Trollin Withdrawal will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. The text of Trollin Withdrawal is very short and is unlikely to be expanded within a reasonable amount of time, thus it makes sense to merge it with the broader topic of Swirlies, just as there is no page for Swirlies side-project The Yes Girls. Morganfitzp (talk) 17:31, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, since no one cares...  Morganfitzp (talk) 03:15, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Created this. It's unfinished and hard to track comings and goings of all members. But the foundation is there and ready for additions and corrections.  Morganfitzp (talk) 18:34, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline of members
Talk:Hoosier Lottery

message: I added a section regarding the current unwon record jackpot. Hope no one wins before I do :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.132.28.43 (talk) 21:02, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I won on a scratch off after visiting your state how can I claim my prize 2601:3C3:827C:12FC:11DF:350E:E250:D5D7 (talk) 21:13, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jumbo cash ticket
Talk:Alan Donohoe

message: There are no references here. When did he accredit his dance moves to Barrymoore, that was probably him saying it as a joke, or the whole article is a joke. Please review and consider for deletion.
The reference for him being a vegetarian links to the vegetarian page, which doesn't show anything.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.15.54.127 (talk) 12:38, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, now the article only has the reference from that page where they say is vegan. Akhran (talk) 06:17, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Johnny Madden

message: Most of this article seems to have been derived from the article at The Celtic Wiki.  --  Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 14:35, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Close paraphrase 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.thecelticwiki.com/page/Madden%2C+Johnny. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Dpmuk (talk) 19:03, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Wilfred Bennetto

message: Some unregistered editors wish to describe the subject of this article as "British" rather than "Cornish".  Why?  Vernon White . . . Talk  18:34, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Simple ... he is British! Should you think reference be made to Cornwall then this should ALSO be included. Please remember that readers outside the UK, who make up the bulk of Wikipedia, (i) will not know the finer points of British regions, (ii) want to know facts! And that include him being British. Why do you insist on changing this correct, and more helpful, description? Why not include British? I can not see what wrong with the article included reference to British as well as Cornwall. Is there evidence showing he is not British?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.171.112 (talk) 16:04, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: On UK articles use the original author's usage unless consensus to change can be reached. Readers outside the UK can always click on a Wikilink if they are unfamiliar woth the descriptor "Cornish> PLEASE sign your posts. DuncanHill (talk) 21:17, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: But this relates to English, Irish, Scottish and Welsh. There is nothing about the origins from individual counties.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.171.112 (talk) 21:53, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chavez (band)

message: Per the results of the four different nomination deletions (one for the band itself and one each for the three albums), I have expanded the Chavez article with references, and merged/redirected the three album articles to the band article. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:35, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD Debates 
Talk:Utah State Route 57

message: As of now, this article is still Start-class.  The route description is actually a single run-on sentence.  Whether it gets expanded or not, that needs to be rewritten.  Also, the mileage in the intersection list does not match the infobox – someone may want to take a look at that. -- Kéiryn (talk) 17:00, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to fix the sentence and the mileage, but because there is a bot-tag at work, it would have to be altered there. Not a big enough deal. IP4240207xx (talk) 22:20, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried improving the route description just a wee bit more, fixed the mileage, oh and to User:IP, I named the reference by the name "reference" because that is the title of the work, it is the State Route 57 reference made by UDOT, not me being lazy. The route description cannot be expanded much more, as it passes through a rural area and connects a power plant to a mine. I don't think there are any campgrounds or anything here. Remember the 50-75% rule here. CL — 00:24, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, regarding the 50-75% rule, I wouldn't consider any article for GA-class or above that didn't have at least two full paragraphs in its route description section, so one too-short paragraph is under 50%.  This applies regardless of what route it is, what the surroundings are, etc.  It's certainly possible that some articles will never get beyond a certain point. -- Kéiryn (talk) 04:00, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Mine disaster move:  ....IP4240207xx (talk) 05:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, this article looks a lot closer to B now. :-) -- Kéiryn (talk) 16:34, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Defense National Stockpile Center

message: I feel this could be a viable article, however, without people willing to build on what I have posted ( see sites such as http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/binghamton.htm and http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/dod/dnsc.htm ), I wholeheartedly agree that no article is better than a stub. The site has been closed since 2006, if that matters. Ebac on keyboard 21:26, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it would be better to move this to Defense National Stockpile Center and create an article detailing all of these depots. --- RockMFR 21:51, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As a retired employee, I can tell you most of the Depots listed have been closed down. By the end of 2012 the whole agency should have closed down. That was the game plan as of Sept 2002 when I retired. I have tried to contact individuals that I knew with no result. At the time of my departure was scheduled to be Sommerville, NJ. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.22.88.112 (talk) 00:04, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deense National Stockpile 
Talk:European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia

message: An IP proposed CSDP missions be merged into this article. I for one voice against against this, the proposer didn't even offer reasons and the EUMM is on a particular mission. If no one voices support I'll delete the tags.- J.Logan`t: 18:11, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I oppose merger, technically the EU Monitor Mission and the ESDP/CSDP missions were run by different entities since the ESDP did not exist at the time of the EUMM.  EricSerge (talk) 22:47, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge 

message: I suggest to rename the article in "European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia" (EUMM Georgia) because the content of the page does not match its name. There are more EUMM missions (Aceh and the former Yugoslavia) than just the one in Georgia. 
EUMM is an umbrella term for this special kind of mission. 
On the other hand, if there is no agreement to change the name, one should change the content to macht the general kind of monitoring-mission EUMM. thx --Schwafm6 (talk) 14:03, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename in "EUMM Georgia" or change content
Talk:Geology of Bangladesh

message: I'll copy-and-paste this to my user page. It usually takes 4 to 6 weeks for me to revamp an article. Bettymnz4 (talk) 06:13, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I will work on this article 
Template talk:Mongol Empire

message: It is extremely disorganized and very confusing. 75.166.53.173 05:50, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Please clean and organize the battles and military campaigns section

message: It would be more interesting if we also add the names of the military commanders who had successfully led his amry repelling the Mongol invasions. 96.229.179.106 (talk) 23:36, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Those were evidently not part of the Mongol Empire, so they don't belong into that template. Besides, it's much too big already. --Latebird (talk) 01:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Names

message: Can you please discuss/help, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mongol_Empire#Excellent_article_and_general_mongol_invasion_conquest_articles 97.118.116.250 (talk) 12:23, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Please help with Mongol/Tatar invasions articles

message: I propose merging Template:Turco-Mongol (created in 2020) into Template:Mongol Empire (created in 2007). They already largely overlap, and I think the content in Template:Turco-Mongol (which essentially has Turco-Mongol tradition, i.e. the political and cultural legacy of the Mongol Empire, as its subject) can easily be explained in the context of Template:Mongol Empire. A merger would not cause any template-size problems (because it is autocollapsible) or weighting problems in Template:Mongol Empire. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 15:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Play Without a Title

message: *stub class - great start on what will probably become a History heading.  Need Plot Synopsis at least, as well as Analysis and/or Reception headings if relevant info is available.
*low importance - a single play constitutes a "highly specific area of knowledge."
--Dereksmootz (talk) 00:56, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Theatre Assessment
Talk:Michel Baron

message: I (massively) expanded thia articel using meterial from EB1911, modernizingthe language. I think the article is now up to date. Please commet if I am wrong. -Arch dude (talk) 02:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: EB 1911

message: A "B-Class" rating was unduly generous for this article, consequently I have reduced it to "Start-Class". Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment for further details about assessing biography articles. I have also changed the WikiProject France rating accordingly. PC78 (talk) 18:51, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Biography assessment
Talk:European Commissioner for Trade

message: I removed the following line for being POV: "Although his tenure was supported by business representatives in Brussels, his departure was welcomed by NGOs and fair trade campaigners who viewed his attitude towards developing countries as aggressive, supporting European big business over development goals." Surely not all NGOs and all fair trade campaigners held this view.--Septemberfourth476 (talk) 14:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mandelson 

message: 3rd nominated by Bown
6th approaved by Council of Ministers
but not yet confirmed by EU parliament hence by use of the term designate.
--Grakirby (talk) 15:11, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't believe she needs to be confirmed by the EU parliament as it appears from the EU press release   --Patrick (talk) 15:19, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  My understanding is different. Can reference if needs be - if controversial. Most of the Uk press has just said appointment but they arer wrong. She has taken office but not with full powers. This is important for Doha trade talks - 15th October?
--Grakirby (talk) 17:10, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

text:  Sorry mind was half elsewhere. My interpretation of same press release is different! That was my ref.  --Grakirby (talk) 17:32, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomination, appointment, confirmation

message: Of interest: Talk:List of European Commission portfolios.- J.Logan`t: 10:54, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: List page
Talk:List of ambassadors of the European Union

message: Ok, we need some general updates on this article but also think about if we should continue to include national flags for ambassadors who are not serving their home country but the EU. does not make sense to focus on nationality here...--LH7605 (talk) 02:12, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree on that. If there is no further opposition I suggest we remove the flags.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 11:45, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates 

message: Several Ambassadors will be newly appointed elsewhere in September 2021. here is the source for it. Then also, is it necessary to mention the former ambassadors? I'll remove the ones which have no Wikipedia article if there is no opposition to that. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 11:42, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it necessary to mention also the former ambassadors?