lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:J.C. Penney

message: The stores are called "JCPenney". The article should be at JCPenney. Mike H 00:03, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)
:No, the company is called "J.C. Penney". The "JCPenney" thing is a stylised logo, nothing more. Check the SEC filings -- you'll find none for this fictional "JCPenney" company.--chris.lawson 22:31, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move to [[J.C. Penney]]

message: I don't have the energy right now to rewrite it, but the employees paragraph reads like a sixth-grader's report on the place where his mom works. --Captadam 15:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind; I just removed it. --Captadam 15:06, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Employees paragraph

message: There are no references to McManus as a founder of JCPenny anywhere except wikipedia. Chirag 22:19, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founder of JCPenny 

message: With Federated merging the MayCo stores into Macy's, J.C. Penney and Macy's are no longer different.  Macy's has opened up as just another department store, therefore the section stating J.C. Penney competes below Macy's is incorrect and needs to be rewritten or removed.  --Write On 1983 02:34, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: J.C. Penney competition

message: Someone changed the name of the Harlem chain of drugstores to "crack houses" and stated that J.C. Penney sold its Italy stores to the mafia.Mary quite contrary 18:21, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for pointing this out. I have fixed it. In the future, you can correct vandalism like this yourself by using the edit this page tab at the top of the page.—WAvegetarian (talk) 20:32, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks; I most definitely will - still learning the ropes. Mary quite contrary 17:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defacement of "1969-1979" Paragraph 
Talk:Tharg the Mighty

message: In the Publication History section there seems to be a mix of story titles in quotes, and some not - which is the preferred version?  Chaheel Riens (talk) 07:11, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The only quotes I can see are for subtitles. For instance, Timehouse was the title of the series, and “Century Duty” was a story within that series. Richard75 (talk) 14:22, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  To quote, or not to quote
Talk:Geography of Sudan

message: Well this is out of Date--J intela (talk) 05:57, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

message: There are now two countries, Sudan and South Sudan. This article needs to be split into two.[[Special:Contributions/41.232.154.174|41.232.154.174]}
(talk) 07:01, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Needs Splitting 
Talk:Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway

message: I reverted to the last edit by User:SPUI.  This edit was correct, according to http://webster.commnet.edu/grammar/commas.htm :  "Use a comma to separate the elements in a series (three or more things), including the last two."  Unfortunately, that means the title of this article is also incorrect; I'll be moving the page to the correct title shortly. SwissCelt 00:10, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert comma edit 

message: Unfortunately, I didn't see Wikipedia:Manual of Style until afterwards.  My apologies to the Wikipedian whose edit I reverted:  Apparently, you were correct after all. SwissCelt 00:16, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Oops!

message: Can some-one come up with a map of their lines? Kdammers 04:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  map 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: . Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Mackensen (talk) 15:52, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Filmmaking

message: I really don't get why "Filmmaking" in the first sentence in the intro, or first paragraph of the page has to be bolded. I noticed a lot of other bolded words and I did not get what it was meant for. Can someone please tell me why and change it?
-Azhen1951 (talk) 17:32, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The title word or phrase of every Wikipedia article should be in boldface per MOS:BOLD.—Anita5192 (talk) 17:31, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmmaking 

message: Would the article benefit from including a history section? It might help with getting a better idea of the influence of filmmaking ans show historical importance of the art. KC.Ma14 (talk) 04:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  History Section 

message: Hi, I'm new here and all, but I think my biggest contribution to this website can be in the filmmaking articles. The biggest problem when it comes to writing about the "business" end, such as the stages of filmmaking, etc. has been source citation. There are too many educational film books and websites, both old and new, that give standard and pretty unbiased definitions and explanations for these topics. I have plenty, so I'll do my best to conflate all these different sources into one standard explanation. Open to discussion on this. Cheers! Tuxedoguy (talk) 03:15, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source Citation 

message: The redirect American actors rehearse with the director has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Fram (talk) 15:52, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:American actors rehearse with the director]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: — Assignment last updated by Coffeestudy7 (talk) 20:42, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ENG 1
Talk:Echelon formation

message: I have moved the ornithological details to a new article Vee formation and added a brief reference to the geological use of the phrase. I think that this covers all the bases. --Theo  (Talk) 21:52, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refactoring 

message: I don’t think the term “limit of exploitation” should link to an article about Marxian economics. Is this intended? At least, the link should point to a section of the article that somehow relates to military “limits of exploitation”.
-- 94.217.108.123 (talk) 20:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, link removed. Vsmith (talk) 21:45, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to “Exploitation of Labour” 

message: Please replace the word "refused" (in the second sentence under 'Military History') with a more accessible word. Repelled? Retreated? Forced back? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KurtmanJones (talk • contribs) 03:00, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Word choice
Talk:Mutopia Project

message: * I hav removed the unref. tag, as everything claimed in the article can be found on the mutopia web site. A link to the project web site is provided.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.189.168.154 (talk) 12:38, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And I've just reinstated it. There are no sources in this article. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 15:57, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Line doubler

message: Shouldn't this article link back to the deinterlace article? ABostrom 01:26, 2004 Dec 20 (UTC)
I would argue that this page is not correct. Line doubling and de-interlacing are not the same thing. A line doubler, as the name suggests, would be something that simply duplicates each line. This is what a VGA video card does when displaying a 200 line CGA-compatible mode for instance (because VGA monitors were designed to run at a 31KHz line rate and are generally incapable of running at the lower 15KHz scanrate used by a real CGA card). The purpose is to modify one progressive scan data stream to be displayed on higher resolution display. De-interlacing is different and more complicated, as the goal is to combine consecutive fields into one full-resolution frame. This requires buffering at least an entire field, if not a whole frame. It may also include filters to work around the artifacts resulting from the fields in the original stream being sampled at different times (commonly the case with SDTV signals).69.205.239.137 (talk) 08:08, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess so but this one i can think deinterlacers like this which is  linear deinterlacer and converts that framerate up and have smooth progressive playback.--HappyLogolover2011 (talk) 23:37, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Reviewing mediation

message: Ack - I'd missed this page. I think it's about time we gave some serious thought to what is and isn't working, and I think this is a pretty good step.
As another one of the outgoing mediators, I've also got a few suggestions.
I think it would help if we had a concrete mailing list, rather than having to grab everyone's email addresses each time we want to get in touch, particularly now that the boards are dead. I think this'd see a few more of the mediators keep up with things. It may be worth creating an IRC channel as well. In this way, I think sannse's idea of working as a committee more often, instead of always as individuals, would be a wise move.
I think we should be keeping a much tighter ship. If someone makes a request for mediation, then IMHO, we should be getting in touch with the other party within hours, and then getting in touch with a mediators mailing list as soon as the other party consents. As part of this, I think it would help to reduce the chair terms to one month, and appoint them by simply sending out a message asking who wants to do it, and who has the most time, rather than the present system, which is a little disorganised. I think it's this which is leading to us getting bypassed in favour of arbitration. 
I think it would help - a lot - if some of us who aren't quite so good could gain guidance from some of those who are, such as Ed. I wonder if it would be possible to put together some sort of "Mediation Manual", so that the likes of Ed could share their knowledge with the newcomers. In this way, I'm quite glad that Ed isn't one of the people leaving the Committee.
I'm a little wary about the idea of "mediation with teeth", as I'm inclined to think that on the few occasions where mediators have reported to the arbitration committee along the lines of "X has cooperated, but Y hasn't", the cases concerned have more often than not been bad-faith ones. I really don't think this is necessary anyway - as long as we're prompt, organised and skilled, then arbitration can deal with the leftovers.
Finally, I think we should be putting out a request - preferably today - for new mediators, advertised in all the usual places. We're losing four mediators, which is a significant proportion of our active people. Thankfully we've still got Ed, but it's not very good if he's doing the whole workload. Ambi 01:27, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: I have just started mediating and I have not noticed a scarcity of mediators.  I think people are signing up to be mediators and the current lag is only a few days.  Maybe this will change later but for now it seems ok.
I would say one problem is mediators who do not have enough time to do a "hands-on" mediation and respond quickly to issues.  This could be addressed by assigning multiple mediators to each case; this seems to have worked well on the cases where I have seen it.  Ideogram 18:07, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  scarcity of mediators
Talk:Freedom Train

message: It looks as if the majority of the body text of this article is lifted straight from http://www.freedomtrain.org/aft_home.htm. Can we verify? Spinolio 22:25, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can tell you that the text is not a direct copy/paste since I wrote it.  I used that site as a reference, winnowing it down to the most relevant facts.  It has always been my intention to come back to it with additional references, I just haven't gotten to it yet.  Slambo (Speak) 14:28, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible plagarism/copyright problem
Talk:Perfection (disambiguation)

message: I don't think perfection should be limited to some quality assurance place. Perhaps a disambiguation page, and then a perfection page analyzing the idea of perfection.
As a person ... David Henry Bonneville ... this man is believed to be the perfect version of perfection.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.152.204.193 (talk) 15:57, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limited 

message: this is a great article in my opinion. but a bit too long...
Agreed. 81.170.101.236 07:36, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article, too large

message: I see a lot of discussion of how Christians view the perfectness (or lack thereof) of man. Where are the Islamic insights in this area? Did I just miss them? JimScott 01:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Something missing? 

message: The article on "Perfection" appears irresistible to perfect idiots, and continually needs to be cleaned of their grafitti.  Wouldn't it be a good idea to protect the article by blocking edits by unregistered users, or by some other means?  logologist|Talk 08:55, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: I think there should be something in here about Boethius' perfection argument in the Consolation, Book III, Prosa X. It seems to be a glaring gap between Plato and the medieval period on the notion of God's perfection, which the article seems to go back and forth on (as do the thinkers). I like this article though, I don't think it's too long. Other traditional ideas of perfection should certainly be added somehow. AshleyOz 09:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Boethius

message: Just asking (I am not quite sure about this), but this appears to be the Perfection(Disambiguation)/Talk page. Is there a page Perfection/Talk, (and such pages for other articles mentioned on the Disambiguation page?) Or just this one page? Yes, I am confused, and it is only a small point so maybe I can figure out the answer myself.Newbyguesses 07:45, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: I think this page sould at least mention the idea of perfect intervals and cadences in music theoryDiddydoobop 21:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Musical perfection

message: There seems to be a bit of confusion regarding this page and the page on perfectionism with a suggestion that the two pages be merged. Perfection is larger than perfectionism, and the ethics section of this page should link to the perfectionism page. Any thoughts? User:Tristen 196.209.34.75 09:48, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ethics
Talk:List of Royal Canadian Navy bases (1911–1968)

message: Can anyone verify that HMCS RENOUS was the same property as CFB Chatham?  I'm 99 per cent sure that HMCS RENOUS referred to an ammunition depot at Renous, south of Chatham, and now the site of a penitentiary.
Z57N (talk) 02:00, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  HMCS RENOUS 
Talk:Germain of Paris

message: At the very bottom of the page, the text reads: "This article incorporates text from the public-domain Catholic Encyclopedia of 1913."
This is a terrible understatement, it is almost word for word, the text on New Advents Catholic Encyclopedia article on Saint Germain.-Diarmada 06:03, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Your mission, should you choose to accept it..."  Wetman 07:49, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: Article is very opinionated, uses weasel words, makes value judgements, etc. Stevenmitchell (talk) 01:52, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very Subjective Article 
Talk:Óscar Elías Biscet

message: My last edit was vandilism, sorry - account has been hijacked at school.
Blake01 17:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sorry for recent edit

message: I removed those block quotes. They're not encyclopediac. Also, they can be accessed from the links at the bottom of the page. Why crowd up an article if it is not necessary? -- takethemud 07:01, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Quotes 

message: There are a lot of claims, but there is little to no evidence that this man's imprisonment has anything to do with his politics, or that he is even really imprisoned for that matter. Where are Cuban government prison records, trial records; any actual Cuban sources regarding this man?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.197.255.211 (talk) 20:39, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seriously, are you even sincere or are you a pro Castro propagandist  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.4.116.27 (talk) 19:00, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Kind of funny you call this guy a "pro castro propaganist" for simply asking for legitimate sources, NPOV, and validation... Is your position so weak that you cannot cite sources or are afraid of criticism... I have no position on Castro, this guy, or Cuba, but I would say the same thing about any other article or NPOV issue... Nothing hurts with having extra sources or information. Vipercat (talk) 21:34, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What was missing from the article is the FACT that Biscet and the other "dissidents" were receiving millions of dollars in funds from the U.S. for subversive activities.  That was central to his arrest and imprisonment, but this article totally omits this fact. Their convictions were based on testimony from agents who had infiltrated the so-called dissident group.  Also used to garner convictions were the bank records which proved that the money came from the special interest section in Florida and the CIA and other U.S. agencies and private groups.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.114.139.254 (talk) 20:04, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair and Balanced View? 

message: Castro co claims that Biscet was recieving CIA funds, is there any evidence of this ? 137.52.150.129 (talk) 21:50, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: CIA Funding ?

message: Would Castro be a reliable source, given that his bias is to not confess to political repression? However, the LA Times and Amnesty International don't have the same bias. I'm not accusing the LA Times and AI of lying, just saying that we don't know. We definitely need more sources for each piece of information, with biases that are different.98.234.112.5 (talk) 22:16, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  We need more sources.
Talk:Support and resistance

message: I've heard this term used.  I think it's part of a system of trading stocks or predicting future stock prices.  It needs to link into stock trading somehow and the model it is using (or it needs to be expanded enough to include it).  Unfortunately, outside my area of competence. RJFJR 03:38, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs linking to stock trading

message: Is the notion of support and resistance based on either company's fundamentals or on the nature of markets (e.g., the distribution of individual traders' valuations of a security?) or is it just patterns people see in data. In other words, can a computer identify support and resistance or does it take an ordained analyst?  —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 17:58, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is possible for a computer algorithm to identify the two levels.--Navin gupt (talk) 03:50, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numerology vs. fundamentals? 

message: The article says:
:However, once the price has passed this level, even by a small amount, it is likely to continue dropping until it finds another support level.
No, actually a small margin is permitted, as the example illustrates.--Navin gupt (talk) 03:50, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: even by a small amount?

message: E.g. in the German article to this topic they write that support and resistance are not scientifically backed concepts and subject of dispute. I think such a statement is warrented for the English article, too. --Felix Tritschler (talk) 13:00, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  No criticism?
Talk:Billie Joe Armstrong

message: Clean up the grammar in the instrument section. 76.178.68.149 (talk) 18:23, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The grammar of the instrument section is hard to read 

message: The location of his first gig was Rod’s Hickory Pit in Vallejo, CA, not El Cerrito Jamedearis (talk) 05:32, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:49, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 September 2022 

message: His son's band is now known as Ultra Q, Mt. Eddy is no longer active. Hrprw (talk) 21:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  His son Jakob plays for Ultra Q 

message: I think this article need to review belong music good article. 122.248.33.22 (talk) 16:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  good article review
Talk:Howl (poem)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved. This consensus is not just numerical, but also the arguments made. As pointed out by some supporters of the move, pageviews is only one measure of the primary topic and not necessarily the decisive one.   (t · c) buidhe 01:22, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, and I'd argue that the poem is of such cultural and era-defining impact that it has that longterm significance, especially when the dictionary aspect is factored in. I really like the howling page, and love the howl of wolves which I've heard often, and would like to see that page improve from a still respectable 45 or so page views a day. Yet this page covers a major literary and cultural topic, easily arguable to still hold primary status. Randy Kryn (talk) 21:17, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 20 January 2022
Talk:New Brighton, Minnesota

message: While this page may be accurate according to the average citizens who edited it, about 98% of the information is not cited. I'm not sure what to do about this... 71.210.173.118 22:44, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pretty Much No Sources 