lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Cowboy Bebop chapters

message: Would it fit to add an exhaustive list of music here?
: Yeah, the OST listing on the main page should probably find its way over here. - mako 07:27, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Music

message: Before I knew of this page (just now), I created a seperate page for each album, with more indepth liner notes than the list here. I found it to be more consice than this version. As such, I shall now proceed to edit this so it refers to the new soundtrack pages. OnionRingOfDoom 02:07, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  New pages 

message: The description of Episode 19, Pierrot le Fou is wrong. It's been stated that the villain is actually modelled after Alan Moore's V for Vendetta. I edited this last night, but it has since been changed back to noting Batman as the reference. I can state several references, if need be. That Guy Over There 23:33, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episodes 

message: This article should be seperated into three different pages and each should be mentioned in the Cowboy Bebop main article.  Most TV shows have an independent episode page.    Manga and music could be detailed on the main page or made into their own page, I've seen anime with magna given their own page, and given the importance of the music and the quality it probably desrerves its own page.  Seeing as Cowboy Bebop is primarily a TV show, upon which music and manga was based on and produced for, and not some general idea which was adapted into various media, this page seems odd
:agreed.--Dangerous-Boy 04:37, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This should be changed to an episode listing, I'm in agreement. -- Makaio 04:05, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Oppose Anime and Manga series often have what are called "Media and Release Information" pages containing both episode lists or guides and CD and Manga volume released.   This article just need clean-up. --Kunzite 16:20, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's already an ep list.--Dangerous-Boy 18:04, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Seperate

message: GEKKAN Shoujo-teikoku 9-GATSU-GO ZOUKAN COWBOY BEBOP PERFECT SOUSHUHEN (月刊　少女帝国　９月号増刊　カウボーイビバップ　ＰＥＲＦＥＣＴ　総集編)
http://www.cowboybebop.org/session/goods/img/books/img09.jpg
http://www.cowboybebop.org/session/goods/index.html
1.It's Showtime 
2.We Will Rock You 
3.Cheap Trick 
4.Black Diamond 
5.She's a Rainbow 
6.Great Deceiver 
7.Bebop Special Short 
8.Thinking Bird, Happy Song 
9.Like a Rolling Stone 
10.What's Your Number 
11.Fight For Your Right 
12.Monkey Magic (NEW)
--9601U (talk) 22:43, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: COWBOY BEBOP PERFECT SOUSHUHEN

message: This page needs TONS more info!  Production details, especially release dates, are needed.  Zurqoxn 05:19, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  expand
Talk:Western Pennsylvania

message: Which is it? (See the respective first sentences in the introduction and Description sections.) --ThorstenNY 03:13, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Western ''Half'' or Western ''Third''? 

message: Request infobox, image and map. All is One (talk) 19:22, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requests for lead 

message: This article could use a visual (perhaps a map?)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.111.199.32 (talk) 00:01, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visual 

message: I'm a nearly lifelong Pixburgher, with over ten years as a Wikipedia editor. Tonight I saw this article for the first time. IMHO, it's a REALLY good one. There's stuff in here that I never knew abaht before, and I'm no jagoff. For example, I've been to just abaht every Cahnty Courthaas in W. Pa., had many ice cream cones and chipped ham sandwiches at Isaly's, bought lotsa stuff at Gimbels, Hornes, Kaufmanns, and Boggs & Buhl, have gotten all three papers at once (the Press, Sun Tele, and Post-Gazette), listened faithfully to Rosey Rowswell, Bob Prince, Porky Chedwick, Pal Pallen, Party Line, n'at. Good work, fellows! Lou Sander (talk) 02:19, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kudos
Talk:Countries of the United Kingdom by population

message: Can anyone who knows how change the name of this page to, for example, "List of United Kingdom countries by population".
And also do the same for the page: "List of United Kingdom nations by area " Thanks. WikiUser 21:45, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, and this is something you've been told about elsewhere. The United Kingdom is a country composed of multiple nations. See Home Nations. -- ChrisO 23:49, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That is an offensive tone given the circumstances of your continual abuse of me. I And I have told you before. I am NOT your slave. Do not order me around all the time. You must stop insulting my country it is racist to say that the UK has no right to exist. It existed BEFORE the USA! An stop following me all over the Wikipedia and automatically reverting my stuff al the time.WikiUser 17:19, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Page title needs correcting

message: People should note please that: Putting information in articles that is 300 years out of date again and again, month after month, amounts to vandalism.
And also that I have never reverted this article page, as is my standard practice on the wikipedia, and s it always has been, I have edited it.WikiUser 17:57, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Article page note

message: The article will in due course be listed at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Please see that page for more details. It will also be listed for disputed content.WikiUser 20:25, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Page title needs correcting, further

message: Are three short list articles really necessary? Can't all this data be represented in one table? I propose all three should be merged here and the article moved to something like List of United Kingdom nations - 129.215.49.73 (talk) 04:12, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Table is confusing on mobile devices. i.e. in non desktop mode.1812ahill (talk) 04:27, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  confusing table 

message: To my knowledge, British overseas territories are also part of the UK. Why is there no mention of their demography in this page and in the total of the UK population?
France has a similar situation (although being a more centralized state) and the demographics is generally presented with Metropolitan population and overall population, the last including integrated communities overseas and semi-autonomous territories. Feel free to explain why this choice was not made on this page (and also the global UK article).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gromissaire (talk • contribs) 20:33, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why only mention the British isles ?
Talk:China Grove, Texas

message: The lyrics to The Doobie Brothers's song are copyright and may not be included in this article. ➥the Epopt 21:05, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lyrics
Talk:Brooklyn–Manhattan Transit Corporation

message: The infobox for this article is currently one suited to a railway line, rather that to a defunct corporation that once ran a railway. I don't know which template would be best. See Fifth Avenue Coach Company for an example of an infobox suited to a bus line. Could someone who knows sort it out? PeterEastern (talk) 21:55, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 
Talk:Soul of the Fire

message: What about the article, exactly, sounds like an advertisement? King Zeal 13:50, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement?

message: The fifth rule is listed here.  It would be nice if there was a place where they were all listed together, and this also linked to that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.99.118.9 (talk) 18:32, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Wizards Rules
Talk:Dora Bryan

message: This reversion was to return the article to one consistent with Wikipedia's style, to remove a sentence started with the word "and", and for reasons of clarity. - MykReeve 22:31, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted 22:22, 25 Jan 2005 

message: The text gives two conflicting reasons for her leaving The Last of the Sumer Wine: one is that she left to concentrate on theatre work, the other that she left due to an inability to remember lines due to health; as the former seems unlikely of the latter is true, this perhaps needs clarification or further info? 09:49, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction? 

message: No details of her family - elsewhere I learn that of her 3 children, two were adopted, and of those two, one died of alcoholism.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.198.77.21 (talk) 01:54, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family 

message: Was she born in Parbold or Southport as the info box says one and the text the other? Penrithguy (talk) 22:37, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The Independent also has Parbold in its obituary: here. Furthermore FreeBMD has this entry for "Name: Broadbent, Dora M., Mother's name: Hill; District: Wigan" which would fit with Parbold. Before 1934 Southport births were registered in the Ormskirk District.  But The Independent seems to have her birth name wrong. Maybe the place of birth needs to be changed? Martinevans123 (talk) 15:55, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of birth
Talk:Nineteen Eighty-Four/Archive 1

message: :With web cameras (webcams) now being commonplace, the privacy of home computer users falls under even greater question.
This is a bad addition; webcams are controlled by the user, the threat to privacy currently comes from spyware and related software. --Sam 12:35, 14 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Webcams 

message: I'd say it is not a political novel but a science fiction one. Although dystopias and utopias lie in between, at the very least if you mention one border genre you should do this same with another. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 01:26, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a science fiction novel. Science and technology are hardly mentioned, and apart from a few things like the speakwrite, technology is not at a greater level than 1940s Britain. Robin Johnson 14:28, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  political novel or science fiction 

message: For many years I was associated with a human rights group that based its operations on the famous 1941 State of the Union speech by President Roosevelt which he called: "the four freedoms." At the same time I was also deeply involved with British and American broadcasting history and the lack of freedoms that existed at that time on the British airwaves. It was in this period of time, which happened to coincide with the year 1984, that I took a new interest in Orwell's work and it suddenly became very obvious how and why Orwell had gained his inspiration for this book. Orwell had written political script for the overseas service of the BBC and this was during the same period of time that Roosevelt made his speech. Because the four ministries in Orwell's book are a reversal of their stated intentions and because Roosevelt outlined four freedoms which match Orwell's ministries (but not in the same order), it becomes very plain, very quickly of what initially motivated Orwell to write this book. Having previously written similar explanations over the years elsewhere, I thought that this information should also be made a part of Wikipedia's fund of knowledge. MPLX/MH 06:34, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know enough of whether this is true to put it in the article, but I heard that the Ministry of Truth is based on the BBC. Orwell, when he worked for the BBC, was asked to falsify some report (or something) and quit on the spot. If it's true. Robin Johnson 16:07, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that Malcolm Muggeridge (who was a friend of Eric Blair) may have been one of the sources for what you stated. But which book he stated this in I cannot recall. I do have several books on Blair and when I get some time I will try to look it up. But I agree with you that this is probably the beginning of the idea that emerged into the novel and therefore it should be included. MPLX/MH 16:15, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  1984 and 1941
Talk:Westford, Massachusetts

message: Well, she had honest intentions, but apparently the system works. But hey, Mrs. Pietras is the man. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.188.117.5 (talk • contribs) 21:01, January 26, 2005
You can congratulate your librarian on her poor judgement, and refer to Wikipedia:Replies to common objections in the future. silsor 02:23, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)
* Please inform Mrs. Pietras that you're not allowed to disrupt Wikipedia to prove a point. -02:24, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  student 

message: Someone needs to take a photo of and write an article about the Abbot Worsted Company —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.0.129 (talk • contribs) 11:16, November 23, 2006
And isn't the Apple Blossom Parade and Carnival in May, not April? The snare 02:40, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abbot Worsted Company 

message: "Project Westford" doesn't belong in the Town of Westford page. Also, what happened to the government section.  It has been entirely removed.  Eh?
64.130.224.17 06:13, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Project Westford"

message: The following section was removed recently as not being notable and not cited.  While it isn't cited, I don't agree it is not notable.
:Early in Kennedy's presidency, Project Westford, funded by the Air Force, became a brief issue in the United Nations. The Soviet Union was concerned with possible crowding of the ionosphere due to the launch of hundreds of millions of less than (~1/3) hair-thin, 1.5 inch long copper dipoles. These dipoles collectively provided passive support to Project Westford's parabolic dish (located in the town) to communicate with distant sites. Then UN Ambassador Adlai Stevenson studied the published journal articles on Project Westford. Using what he learned on the subject and citing the articles he had read, he successfully allayed the fears exhibited by the vast majority of UN ambassadors from other countries. He and the articles explained that sunlight pressure would cause the dipoles to only remain in orbit for a short period of approximately three years.
What do others think? WilliamKF (talk) 22:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it might be more sutable on the article for Haystack Observatory since that's where it would've taken place, and a link could be made from the Westford article.  In any event, I don't think it should be posted at all until it contains at least one credible citation. Parcanman (talk) 22:21, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed paragraph on project westford 

message: The brief part about Kimball Farm should be revised; as is, it's a blatant advertiseme   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.68.134.1 (talk) 16:45, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kimball's 

message: I think the description of the Westford CAT is a little long, perhaps this could be placed in it's own article? Parcanman (talk) 19:08, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Media 

message: Does the population census update every 10 years? If so, I will change my edit. Thanks for your help in advance! Zzendaya (talk) 02:57, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population
Talk:Orange, Ohio

message: An article has been created for Orange Christian Academy, but it does not assert notability and the school has now closed / changed hands or something.
I suggest, merging to the Education section of this article and redirecting? Alternatively, redirecting to an article about the current name of the school.Garrie 05:06, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well the article has been listed for deletion now anyway.Garrie 05:22, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Orange Christian Academy]] 
Talk:Pakistani philosophy

message: This article was originally on the wikify list.  I've wikified it, but I'm unsure of the topic, so could someone please check the text.  The JPS 00:11, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:The Godfather Part III

message: One of the references being used in the "historical background" section is, at the very least, incomplete and is, in its current state, not useful:
:"Item notes". The Economist. The University of California. 1843. pp. v. 286–289.
This is reference #25 and, as you can see, the information provided is not accurate or useful.  This needs to be sorted out or removed.  Can anyone make any sense of this? ---The Old JacobiteThe '45 13:45, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:   Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 11:45, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical background 

message: Should we mention this new recut briefly in the lead? Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:41, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Not in my opinion. At least wait until it has been seen and judged.Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 16:03, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes - the recut should be mentioned. There's absolutely nothing wrong about mentioning in the lead (with relevant sources) the news about the upcoming recut by Coppola. --82.181.143.171 (talk) 06:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I repeat, maybe after it has been seen and reviewedGareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 10:57, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Gareth. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recut 

message: In Special:Diff/448514779 (2011-09-05),  added: "In his audio commentary for Part II, he stated that only a dire financial situation caused by the failure of New York Stories compelled him to take up Paramount's long-standing offer to make a third installment." with the reference "The Godfather Part II DVD commentary featuring Francis Ford Coppola, [2005]". But in Special:Diff/553573879 (2013-05-05), someone changed this to "[...] the failure of One From The Heart [...]", without touching the reference, so that it is not clear whether the new claim was sourced or not, and it potentially contradicted the source. A contributor in the French WP who listened to the entire audio commentary has said that this was not mentioned. So I have removed the claim in Special:Diff/995355606. Does anyone have additional information? — Vincent Lefèvre (talk) 16:48, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have re-added the sentence, slightly modified, with new sources. — Vincent Lefèvre (talk) 18:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''The Godfather Part II'' DVD commentary (2005)
Talk:The Godfather Part II

message: Is there a definite explanation of the appearance of Frankie's brother at the trial?  Had he come to America, at his own expense, as Tom Hagen describes, or, was he brought by the Corleones as a warning to Frankie, that they could reach anyone, anywhere? And that if Frankie didn't comply, they'd kill his brother?  Or is this left to the audience's imagination, and in the end, we can only go by what is said in the movie?
Best regards
TheBaron0530 (talk) 15:42, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The movie never makes it clear how his brother got there, or if there were any actual threats on his life.  He just appears, sits next to the Corleones in the audience, and leaves again.  At no time does the film explain his appearance.  You as an audience member are free to use context clues and other dramatic elements to draw your own conclusions.  But at no point does anyone explain anything about him.  --Jayron32 17:41, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pentangeli's brother - Voluntary visit, or hostage?
Talk:Relative strength index

message: In his book, Trading for a Living, Alexander Elder suggested looking for reversal patterns in technical indicators such as RSI. This is an interesting variation on the 'magic number' overbought and oversold application. For example, a breakout from a double bottom on the RSI chart will often precede the breakout of a double bottom on the price chart.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.27.4.157 (talk) 01:15, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative intepretation using reversal patterns

message: The equation for RS looks like incorrect in case of continual growth, when denominator becomes a zero:
: RS = { EMA[N] \; of \; U \over EMA[N] \; of \; D }
Starkest (talk) 10:33, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Division by Zero

message: OK, I'll readily admit to being not great at math, but I do have a minor in mathematics, and I'm wondering how this
 RSI = 100 - 100 \times { 1 \over 1 + RS } 
can be rewritten as 
 RSI = 100 \times { EMA[N]\;of\;U \over (EMA[N]\;of\;U) + (EMA[N]\;of\;D) } 
The stockcharts RSI has it written as 
 RSI = 100 - { 100\over 1 + RS }
I guess maybe I'm probably missing something obvious here, as usual. 1 + RS can be rewritten as
 {  (EMA[N]\;of\;U) + (EMA[N]\;of\;D) \over EMA[N]\;of\;U  } 
so  100 \times { 1 \over 1 + RS }
can be rewritten as
 100 \times EMA[N]\;of\;U \over(EMA[N]\;of\;U) + (EMA[N]\;of\;D)
I don't see how the current equation got rid of the 100 .... 67.189.104.78 (talk) 00:57, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't understand 

message: I find different formulation of RS, and U and D:
:U = max(0, close_{now} - close_{prev})
:D = max(0; close_{prev} - close_{now})
Or even simpler as:
:U = +max(0, close_{now} - close_{prev})
:D = -min(0; close_{now} - close_{prev})
It is of course the same as in article, but shows, that U and D, are just positive and negative parts of close_new - close_prev, which makes it easier to visualise and understand.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.18.219.251 (talk) 00:29, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  different formulation 

message: Information to be added or removed: Adding an external link to https://www.nelhajj.com/rsi-indicator/ which contains statistics on Relative Strength Index signal frequency and accuracy. This information is not present anywhere on the web as it presents statistics of RSI over several years and thus is helpful to anyone interested in learning about the relevance of RSI in the present day
Naimelhajj (talk) 18:22, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't link to self-published sources, as they're not considered reliable enough. – Thjarkur (talk) 17:22, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some proposed changes
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JonGwynne

message: Question for Ed Poor and Silverback: How does a user deal with another user who adopts a sneering insulting atitude and continues it in edit after edit on talk pages and revert summaries? When has it (sunk?) to the level requiring an RfC? How much insulting behavior are we supposed to ignore? Surely there is something the arbcom, or whoever, can do to stop the barrage of insults. WMV has been very patient with this mess. Others would have left in disgust. How many good potential editors do we lose because of insulting behavior such as this? Vsmith 00:47, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: JonGwynne was rather free with his name calling on the Crichton talk page.  I had not thoroughly reviewed that before.  I generally ignore name calling, and try to respond to any substance.  Funny thing is, I think WMC was wrong on Crichton and is too deferential to qualifications and consensus.  However, I don't think the "cause" is served by JonGwynne's name calling, personal attacks and peevishness.  Based on his Crichton behavior I will move to full endorsement.--Silverback 11:35, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  (William M. Connolley 14:13, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)

text: I think Silverback and Vsmith may be mistaken.  I would like to thank Vsmith for using the phrase "sneering insulting atitude" [sic].  That is an excellent, though typgraphically flawed, description of WMC's tone.  The name-calling and personal attacks on the Crichton talk page are from WMC, not directed at him.  I point particularly to him calling Crichton "silly", "daft" or "willfully ignorant" as well as referring to his books as "potboilers".  Not exactly what one would consider the civil behvavior about which WMC is continually (what was the word he used on the MC page?) "bleating". (Source: WMC comment dated 15:34, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  How much? 

message: You people provoke each other, then you complain when the other people are getting upset.  Perhaps you could just stop provoking each other.  Aren't we supposed to be writing an encyclopedia?  What does this have to do with it?   — Cortonin | Talk 04:34, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Somewhat Sad.