lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kachess Lake

message: Perhaps this image would be useful? - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 01:10, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image? 

message: Controversary around Kachess Lake has grown substantially in recent years because of a proposal to install diesel pumps to pump natural lake water out of the lake to increase the allotment of water to proratable water rights holders in Yakima Valley during drought years. See https://www.usbr.gov/pn/programs/eis/kdrpp/index.html. Because pumping will need to be maintained continually while the lake level is below the dam outlet, it will need to continue throughout the year to avoid dewatering downstream. A number of environmental groups (including the Sierra Club), property owners, the local fire district and people who use the lake and it's surrounds for recreation (hiking, boating and camping) have expressed concerns include the potential extirpation of fish and local wildlife populations, loss of recreational benefits and property value decreases (impact on wells, access to lake and view), and reduced access to lake water for firefighting purposes. I have already done a relatively minor edit to clarify that the dam already impounds a substantial amount of water from the original pre-dam lake and that it was intended to utilize the full capacity of the lake's available watershed. More content that both described the Bureau of Reclamation's "Drought Relief Pumping Plant" and the opposing viewpoints regarding the plan seems warranted. 
I would be happy to compose that additional content, but I have only limited Wikipedia experience, so I am seeking guidance on the best way to proceed. (Since I do not have a profile available to you, I'll share that my educational background is in History and Physical Sciences with graduate studies in History of Science and I have been in a technical leadership role in software engineering for over 30 years. While I am also a property owner at the lake, I would, of course, ensure that the additional content is balanced and neutral in tone.) Looking forward to your more expert guidance.
--EJSheldon (talk) 18:00, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Content Needed?
Talk:Lincoln Public Schools

message: Could we get a source for school opening and closing dates. A quick Google search turned up nothing.
This resource should be a source for all of these dates, though it is not in an easily consumable format.
LPS 'Pedia: http://wp.lps.org/pedia/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.137.100.150 (talk) 16:04, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for school closing/openings
Talk:Lesser Abkhazia

message: :Today this term is used for lands to the north from the Bzyb River or Gagra Range. The northern border of the area is disputed and varies from Khosta, Sochi and Nechepsukho to Kodosh Cape and Taman Peninsula.
:: This part of the text needs to be well-sourced. I have not been able to find evidence that the term is still in use. --Ghirla-трёп- 08:36, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Its historic use is also under question. The geographic term "Sadzen" seems to be a modern conjecture. The area had always been known as either Zygia or Lesser Abkhasia.--KoberTalk 19:02, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern use of the term
Talk:Radio atmospheric signal

message: This was really my personal idea, but people in my research group at Stanford agree with the concept. However, impulse response is generally a term that we apply to linear and time-invariant systems. The magnetosphere is certainly not time-invariant (though it can be quasi-static on short time scales) and it is sometimes (but not always) nonlinear. Also, a sferic is not a perfect impulse; it has most of its energy concentrated in the VLF range, and it's (obviously) a finite-duration signal. But it's still a pretty good approximation to an impulse for VLF measurement purposes.
Here's the point: should we cut out the bit about the whistler being the impulse response of the magnetosphere (with the sferic as the impulse), or should we elaborate on it?
Also, should we move/copy it to the whistler article?
Drdan14 05:21, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whistler as an Impulse response 

message: Three figures in this article appear to be scans from journal articles, so the copyrights are not clear. I have nominated all three for deletion on Commons. Glrx (talk) 02:59, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Two reappeared after being deleted on Commons. I've renominated them. Glrx (talk) 17:28, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three illustrations nominated for deletion on Commons 

message: Sferics do arise from lightning discharge, but also from other sources of atmospheric phenomena which are not mentioned in the article. Movement and friction of large masses of air can also cause atmospheric electricity, also tornados. This should be mentioned in the article. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foehn_wind Ontologix (talk) 22:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insufficient scope 

message: One of the supporting citations for this section is "The Invisible Rainbow" Arthur Firstenberg. Arthur Firstenberg seems to be an advocate of the fringe beliefs centering around the electromagnetic spectrum. I do not have access to this book but reviews on amazon and search results on google seem to suggest that the book is reflective of his opinions. I have not marked the whole section as questionable as the other source is in german and I am unable to verify it as I can not read the german language. 96.84.73.145 (talk) 02:44, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effect of sferics on humans pseudoscience?
Talk:Arkle

message: The image tag for stamps specifically says that fair use can be claimed "to illustrate the stamp in question (as opposed to things appearing in the stamp's design)". That last bit sounds as though we can NOT use it for this article. 81.159.57.18 05:27, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can that stamp image be used? 
Category talk:Biblical manuscripts

message: :This is a work in progress. As we expand the number of articles, more issues will arise, some may need to be reviewed.
:So far some of us have agreed on the following naming conventions:
:*papyri: e.g. Papyrus 66 (for P66)
:*uncial manuscripts with conventional names: e.g. Codex Alexandrinus (for A / Uncial 01)
:*other uncials: e.g. Uncial 0220 (for 0220)
:*
:*
:"Versions" (manuscripts of NT in languages other than Greek) are apparant from the "Script" field in the infobox.
:Diglots can be noted by using e.g. Greek/Latin.
:Manuscripts with Old Testament contents are similarly apparant from the "Text" field in the infobox.
:Articles are likely to fall into multiple categories: e.g. Oxyrynchus manuscripts, Coptic versions, Illuminated manuscripts, 4th century books, etc.
:However, the primary categories Papyri, Uncials, Miniscules, Lectionaries should be mutually exclusive.
:Diglots and large codices containing Old and New Testaments as well as extra canonical material provide us with a classification challenge we have not as yet clarified.
:The distinct traditions of the Hebrew and Greek texts of the Jewish canon also present an unresolved challenge.
:Please feel free to add suggestions, question current practice or ask for help.
:Alastair Haines 05:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Conventions for handling biblical manuscripts at English Wiki

message: What is the rationale behind including :Category:Christian texts but not :Category:Jewish texts?-Andrew c [talk] 16:56, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish and Christian texts 

message: :Category:Christian manuscripts simply CANNOT be a parent to this article, as the concept of a "Biblical manuscript" is larger than a single religion. We could do it the other way around where:
*Biblical manuscripts
**Christian manuscripts
**Jewish manuscripts
But I believe that this would simply add another layer of hierarchy that doesn't add that much information, and could create confusion for a number of early manuscripts (Jewish Christian as one example). There was a big discussion a couple years back that created the current system in use today. I think Carl is being a bit too bold in not at least trying to get consensus for a new system before hand, and even worse edit warring over retaining these bold, new changes. What is the problem with the current system, how does the new category "Christian manuscripts" address this problem, and what specific purpose does the category serve. Can we at least agree that it cannot possibly be a parent article here as "Biblical manuscripts" is not specifically Christian in that include Jewish manuscripts.-Andrew c [talk] 18:45, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Christian manuscripts
Talk:List of Neighbours characters

message: Since there seems to be a bit of an issue with Krista and Reece being regulars or not, I wanted to start a discussion here. The sources have started that Reece is a limited time role (or at least from what I saw in the ones about her introduction), so I do not know about her role in the credits. I think keeping Reece in recurring for now would be a good idea until a source says otherwise, but I thought I would open this up now to see what people think. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 22:33, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: See the "Melanie and Reece" section above - the closing credits make a clear distinction between main and guest cast, and Barton remains credited as a guest. Krista is credited as part of the regular cast from her first appearance (I wonder if she might not be dead!). U-Mos (talk) 22:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly. Krista is listed as a regular in the end credits and Reece is not. I was surprised by how much background scenes they included introducing Krista. I was less surprised when I saw she was credited as a regular and it became clear she may not have died. Then we saw Eden alone, having supposedly moved and disposed of her body in ten minutes from the top of Lassiters?!Rain the 1 23:24, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mischa 

message: On the closing credits Abigail Tanaka And Isla Tanaka-Brennan are always listed separately from the main cast names and are always listed next to guest/recurring cast like Chelsea or Eden which would mean these 2 characters are recurring cast not main so they need to ideally be moved from main list to the recurring list of cast.
}92.232.179.45 (talk) 15:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been merrily ignoring this for a while, but you're right and it's hard to figure what to do. Abi, Isla and Sam were for a time listed with the other (let's call them) semi-regular characters of Nell, Hugo, JJ and Dex, but that has changed as of late. Now they are placed below guest characters (e.g. the 4 April episode listed JJ [space], Chelsea, Felix [space], Abigail in that order). Generally we don't downgrade, but perhaps this is an exception? U-Mos (talk) 17:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: And right after this was implemented, Nell and Hugo were credited below the guest cast in today's episode. I'll keep an eye out for consistency. U-Mos (talk) 12:44, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

text: These aren't good reasons. The only valid reason for a character to be listed with the main cast is for them to be credited with the main cast (see the Mischa Barton discussions on this page). There are multiple blocks of cast credits, and no issue with the second of these (being clearly above guest cast) being categorised as main cast. The issue we have is the characters discussed here used to be credited in this section, and are now not. (Of course Nell and Hugo were consistently main characters for years before the revival, so wouldn't be downgraded anyway - Isla, Abigail and Sam are more uncertain; Isla in particular was credited with the main cast very briefly). U-Mos (talk) 11:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recurring cast
Talk:Ptolemaic Empire

message: This change was made back in May 2006 at History of Greek and Roman Egypt. The text was since moved to Ptolemaic Egypt, but the important point is that nomarch was correct, and monarch was incorrect. I have now changed things so they are correct again. Please can anyone watching the article ensure that a similar well-intentioned mistake is not made in the future. Carcharoth 08:45, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monarch and Nomarch 

message: A large chunk of this article (Namely, all of the portions discussing the Ptolemaic Army) is lifted from the unit descriptions of the Ptolemaioi army for Europa Barbarorum, a mod for the PC game Rome: Total War. This probably should be corrected. The lifted text can originally be found here: http://europabarbarorum.com/factions_ptolemaioi_units.html Swordwraith 20:11, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarized Material 
Talk:Buildings of Tulsa, Oklahoma

message: What is the vision for this article? The title is "Buildings" which cold include anything. However the main table includes height and stories columna, which are most usefull for a list of skyscrapers and high-rise buildings. There are also images of models of the BOK Center, which would imply that tall buildings are not the only thing considered here.  I have been collecting information here for an article on Tulsa's architectural history, which could be incorporated here. My list will eventually include several hundred more buildings, including houses. Dsmdgold 02:36, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This article
Talk:Kent Music Report

message: OK. The Kent Music Report did not actually begin publishing record sales officially until May of 1974. Any of David Kent's records before that were just 'retro-calculated' from local sales, whereas the Go-Set charts were the official national charts for Australia related popular music. Go-Set was the official chart from 1966 to August of 1974, meaning if a song got to number one, it officially counted. It ran concurrently with the Kent Music Report for 3 months, because his records started before Go-Set's abandonment. So anything published in the Kent Music Report before 1974 should not be counted. But for example, Daddy Cool's "Eagle Rock" was not published in Kent Music Report in 1971 as it never existed, but it got to #1 on the Go-Set charts. While Wikipedia states it's a number one hit, Wikipedia should probably be acknowledging Go-Set as the reference.PeterMan844 (talk) 03:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Confused much?
Talk:The Allen Group

message: I added the g11 speedy to this article because it appears to be little more than promotional material for the company. Regarding notablity, the article states that it has notable clients, but does not say how the company itself is notable. Having notable clients does not make one notable. Notability does not automatically transfer. If it did, anyone could claim notability. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 06:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because one newspaper wrote about it doesn't automatically qualify it as notable. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 07:40, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: speedy is only if there is nothing to indicate importance, or where there is no practical way to rewrite the article to be descriptive rather than promotional.  see WP:CSD. DGG (talk) 14:23, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy delete 
Talk:Thomas L. Baptiste

message: Note that the original text of this article was essentially copied from http://www.af.mil/bios/bio.asp?bioID=4599.  The source text is the work of a US government employee and exempt from copyright protection. --Butseriouslyfolks 06:13, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original 
Talk:Ed Miller (Scottish folk musician)

message: Ed announced tonight that KUTX will replace both "Folkways" and "Across the Water" as of September 1, 2014.  I missed the first half of the announcement, and haven't been able to find any supporting documentation online. -Ben (talk) 01:57, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  KUTX Cancelation of "Folkways" and "Across the Water"
Talk:Raggejavreraige

message: There was a link to pitch in the sentence:
"A pulldown descent of Storstupet is complicated by its low angle (about 80 degrees), and many teams prefer to detackle this pitch from above"
I have removed the link just now, until someone more knowledgable can redirect it to the correct pitch link. =) Marc 06:39, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig link
Talk:Francisco Guterres

message: Would be interesting to know where this nickname comes from.--Khajidha (talk) 01:37, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lu-Olo 
Talk:Ascend

message: It may be necessary to split this page up into separate disambiguous pages for the varations of "acend", but I like having all the uses on a single page--perhaps templates could be used? -Eep² 07:17, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Secondary disambiguation pages seem the way to go. Better than 2 columns anyway. For example you could go for Ascend (album). (Emperor (talk) 23:44, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

text: was not already a true disaster two years ago, it is now. Entries on the current revision, for words other than "ascend", should be checked for the small minority of them that may deserve entries on other Dab pages.  And any of those words that are Rdrs linking to the accompanying Dab page should be checked, and probably in every case become either a Dab or a primary-topic article.--Jerzy•t 06:06, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: split up?
Talk:Comprehensive History of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

message: I have a recent book on historiography around somewhere that discusses all the LDS historians who wrote material that Roberts gathered, edited, and used in this work.  Will try and add that information.  Best........WBardwin 07:33, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds pretty good. I had actually written a sizeable article, when I hit a wrong button and the browser took the page elsewhere. I hadn't saved the new page yet. Oh well. Tomorrow is another day.Isaac Crumm 07:41, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for this work

message: The page name was recently changed to Comprehensive History of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, with the "the" lowercased. However, this runs counter to the reasoning conclusion drawn in previous discussion, archived above. While lowercasing the "the" in references to the church itself is well and good and makes sense and is the consensus, I am not persuaded that overturns the reasoning used to determine the appropriate casing of this book's title. Editors previously agreed that the book capitalized "The" in its original 1930 publication (i.e., Comprehensive History of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, as can be seen in the image of the title page on this Google Books page) and that the page name should capitalize the book's title according to that casing, since it appears intentional in its original publication, and the page name is intended to be identical to the book's title. I've seen the RfC on casing for the church institution itself, but the RfC was only about the institution's name and does not address the consensus on this page, which is about the title of a published work as it was published. In the absence of a reason to discount the prior consensus for this page and this book's title (and specifically for this one book's title; this has no bearing on other pages or the more general question of casing the institution's name), I am inclined to move the page so the page's name matches the book's title.
(I don't know if this is irony or something else, but although the page was moved, the first instance of "Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints" was not revised, leaving the capitalized "The" there intact.) P-Makoto (talk) 06:41, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Previous consensus, on how to capitalize this book's title specifically, unaddressed
Talk:List of school districts in Nebraska

message: Its a list, but it can have quality Victuallers 22:54, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: It appears 38 state lists are alphabetical, not by County, so you might consider changing this to be consistent.   RickH86 (talk) 14:42, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization 

message: This will show districts which have been consolidated:
* http://web.archive.org/web/20061012072414/http://ess.nde.state.ne.us/OrgServices/Reorganization/Downloads/state_2006_07_11x17.pdf
* http://web.archive.org/web/20061013174512/http://ess.nde.state.ne.us/OrgServices/Reorganization/Downloads/state_2006_07_60x42.pdf
WhisperToMe (talk) 17:59, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old maps of Nebraska school districts
Talk:Districts of the Gambia

message: There is currently a request for comments at Talk:The Gambia on whether to capitalize the definite article in the country name. Feel free to participate in the discussion. Jafeluv (talk) 05:39, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC: The Gambia or the Gambia 

message: Rulers are their  districts 197.242.131.57 (talk) 22:00, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ingrates stidies
Talk:Source routing

message: This article looks factually correct to me, so I'm removing the disputed tag.  If you think the article is incorrect, please leave a comment in the discussion page to go with the disputed tag. Evand 07:53, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Derby North (UK Parliament constituency)

message: UKIP : 18.2% ???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.70.165.22 (talk) 16:22, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Duly corrected, thanks! Jellyman (talk) 09:28, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The changes in %age of the votes in 2010 compared to 2005 have been calculated wrong. For example, Labour went down from 44.0% top 33.0%, a drop of 11% (actually 10.94%), not 9% as the article states. I'm amending the figures accordingly -- Cabalamat (talk) 18:10, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Percentage changes in votes calculated wrong 
Talk:Dracula (Billy and Mandy)

message: How could Dracula be Grim's childhood idol? I mean, Grim was a child during the stone age while Dracula could not have been born ( or spawned or whatever) for thousands of years? Am I the only one to notice this?203.53.167.180 09:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grims idol
Talk:Candiria

message: I would say experimental metal or mathcore, not hardcore.. or? Tecfan 08:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre?
Talk:Bones Bearings

message: How do i get this article to come up when you search "bones"?
Useraccountnum1 08:12, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing 