Talk:Ontario New Democratic Party

message: Just a suggestion ... how about a separate page for listing the party's historical MPPs?  CJCurrie 22:46, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think that this article should be split into the CCF years, and the NDP.  So I propose that this article only covers from 1961 onwards, while a seperate article covers the CCF.Abebenjoe 12:32, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split Article

message: :Image:NONDP.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:51, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:NONDP.PNG

message: :Image:NONDP.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:57, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:NONDP.PNG

message: I have reverted this inclusion and come to the talk page as per WP:BRD as I strongly suspect that this will be reverted by NotWillyWonka. MOS:FORLANG is not applicable here because " the subject of the article is closely associated with a non-English language" is being interpreted as licence to include the French translation. The article subject is predominantly discussed and reported upon in English. Just because we are in Canada does not mean we translate everything into French. NotWillyWonka has left a note on my talk page indicating that we should include the French because we are discussing Ontario, not Quebec which he alleges has a policy of suppressing English. This is irrelevant. --Daffydavid (talk) 21:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The mention of Québec's language policy was not an argument for inclusion, or non inclusion. The mention was to show the contrast of the two government's handling, and the "majority language groups" general views on how  usage of the the minority language differ, as they do regionally across the whole country. Ontario embraces bilingualism, where Québec suppresses it, FOR EXAMPLE: Ontario has both English and French official names for ministries, departments, agencies, political parties, etc, whereas Québec does not. There is no reason to  include the French name for "mayor of Chilliwak", for example as there is no real ties to French. Ontario has a relative substantial francophone population, many francophone communities, and minimum francophone service requirements. This article is about a provincial (Ontario branch of national) political party, showing as MOS:FORLANG states: "the subject of the article is closely associated with a non-English language". Including the French name does not remove any factual information, is not incorrect, and is not controversial. Request for discussion were initiated by myself, WP:BRD says discuss before re-reverting. The IP user in question has refused on this article, and may other articles, to discuss. Almost all of their edits have been reverted by many users.--NotWillyWonka (talk) 04:59, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually WP:BRD states be Bold, Revert, Discuss, but you seem to think that WP:3RR doesn't apply to you NotWillyWonka. Had either of the two parties (you or the IP) had reported the other you BOTH would have been given a block. It is edit warring and reverting even if you believe you are correct will get you a block. But, enough of that. My argument against inclusion of the French translation is that the way I interpret the section of MOS:FORLANG we have been discussing is that this is intended for article subjects that are predominantly mentioned in a foreign language not for including a alternative language in lesser usage. From MOS:FORLANG, "For example, an article about a location in a non-English-speaking country will typically include the local language equivalent". We are in an English speaking country so this manual of style doesn't apply here. A google search reveals well over 2 million results for the party name in English versus just over 100,000 for the French version. Based on this I argue that the NDP does not in fact use it's French name commonly. I am objecting based on policy not personal preference. I am fluently bilingual.--Daffydavid (talk) 03:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: We are in a bilingual country. For example, is just that an example, not the only only way to do things, or to interpret statements. I know that some in Québec have difficulty with the concept of a minimum and guidelines, and if it's not specifically spelled out then it's not so. The subject (ONDP) is closely associated with a non English language, French in this case. --NotWillyWonka (talk) 03:50, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: How is the Ontario New Democratic Party closely associated with French? 117Avenue (talk) 04:56, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Being in a bilingual country has absolutely nothing to do with a Wikipedia policy. Hell, the NDP can't even be bothered to register a web page in their French name -- http://fr.ontariondp.ca  All they did is added a French translation of an English website. We don't add alternative spellings in other articles because those countries or institutions have more than 1 official language. For instance the Wikipedia article on the United Nations uses only English but the Official languages of the United Nations are Arabic, English, French, Chinese, Russian and Spanish. I bet 117Avenue is still waiting for an answer to his question. --Daffydavid (talk) 15:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I totally forgot. 117Avenue (talk) 00:14, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

text: Daffydavid, thank you for providing a link to the ONDP's French language site. The fact that they provide an extensive French language site as a mirror of their English language site is strong evidence of the party being closely associated with the French language. The domain name is a triviality compared to the conrptent of the site. Ground Zero | t 00:49, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that's funny. If the website was in French and then translated to English I would be in total agreement with you. But, since it's not your argument is not convincing.--Daffydavid (talk) 09:52, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  MOS:FORLANG 

message: It's  time for disability people to get a pay increase  everything is going up .Since Covid began we have bin left in the dark.It's  time for change? 2607:FEA8:1CA1:4FB0:266:DEFF:FE0A:5D63 (talk) 22:02, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odsp