Talk:Henry Benedict Stuart

message: While Henry may have claimed to be "a Prince of England and of Scotland, Duke of York", he was not recognised as such by anyone other than Jacobites.  The article should probably be amended. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.149.50.59 (talk • contribs) 
:He was, and is, recognised as a Prince by the British Royal Family, see for example . DrKiernan 08:46, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Born in Rome to a Polish mother and a half-Italian (and part French) father, Henry can hardly be described as an 'English nobleman'  In truth there was very little English-or Scottish-blood in his veins.  The only royal title he ever used, incidentally, was Henry IX, not 'Henry IX and I'.  I know there were no 'King Henrys' of Scotland (well, actually, there was one) but this very modern national sensitivity towards issues of royal title should not be allowed to pollute the historical record.
Rcpaterson 02:22, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry-an English nobleman? 

message: Recently the file :File:Henry Benedict Maria Clement Stuart, Cardinal York by Antonio David.jpg (right) was uploaded and it appears to be relevant to this article and not currently used by it. If you're interested and think it would be a useful addition, please feel free to include it. It shows him as a child, circa 1729-1732. Dcoetzee 09:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New file [[:File:Henry Benedict Maria Clement Stuart, Cardinal York by Antonio David.jpg]] 

message: Henry Benedict Stuart (11 March 1725
Henry Benedict Maria Clement Thomas Francis Xavier Stuart was born in exile at Rome on 6 March 1725
Which one should I believe?Heinrich ⅩⅦ von Bayern (talk) 15:34, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthday? 

message: There is a single unexplained line saying that he was the Last to Touch for the King's Evil... but with no exploitation as to what the heck this refers to.  Please elaborate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.232.226.141 (talk) 03:48, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Touch for the King's Evil? 

message: If he was a Cardinal how could he also be considered the pretender to the throne?  Wouldn't accepting church office constitute a forfeit of all claim to secular titles?  Emperor001 (talk) 03:55, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Titles in Pretence

message: WP:CATEGRS states that in order to place a person in an LGBT category, "For a dead person, there must be a verified consensus of reliable published sources that the description is appropriate."  There is no such consensus for Henry Benedict Stuart.  So this article should not be placed in any category for LGBT persons. --PluniaZ (talk) 03:04, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  LGBT Category (2019 Discussion) 

message: Is this the same person as referred to in Terry Pratchet's 'Nation'? Qwerfjkl talk 21:52, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 

message: * :Category:LGBT Roman Catholic clergy	
* :Category:LGBT Roman Catholic bishops
* :Category:LGBT Roman Catholic cardinals
* Advocate.con: 21 Gay Popes, Cardinals, and Assorted Catholic Leaders, By Jacob Ogle
Stuart was a LGBT Roman Catholic cardinal. That should be sorted in cats. --188.96.230.248 (talk) 20:43, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This is unconfirmed - it is at best historic speculation and as such he cannot definitively be said to fall into these categories. As stated in above 2019 discussion. Calum707 (talk) 17:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think one editor's opinion can be classified as a "discussion". Liz Read! Talk! 18:15, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I don’t think one editor’s opinion can be classified as fact and therefore lumping the page into a category without any real authority seems disingenuous. Calum707 (talk) 19:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I was talking about your opinion and the IP account you used. I was not alone in finding your reverts unacceptable. These categories seem to hit a nerve with you. Liz Read! Talk! 07:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorted in LGBT cats 

message: The citations are a bit of a mess. There are full citations that are not set up to match a couple of  instances, there are shortened footnotes that do not even use templates & are hence unlinked, & there is one full citation with the first name listed before the last name & a link to the Italian Wikipedia page for ISBN lookups.
Tut tut!
I hope to spend some time fixing this by   as per WP:CITEVAR's Generally considered helpful section. Peaceray (talk) 18:35, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The only question is whether the four web citations should also be converted to  format. Peaceray (talk) 04:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent citations 

message: @Calum707, @Liz, @Dimadick, and the IP. Please stop reverting each other and discuss here. Thank you. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:01, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please Discuss Here Rather Than Continuing To Revert