Talk:List of wealthiest non-inflated historical figures

message: This page is not the same as List of billionaires (2007). Instead, it is a page listing people or billionaires 
who have reached their highest point in their fortune, regardless of the year, and are listed without begin adjusted for economic inflation. This is similar to Wealthy historical figures 2007, of which I 
made.  Please not that this is not a copy of an other article and is independently on it’s on subject.
Jughead.z(1) (talk) 20:17, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion Issue  

message: Shouldn't Bill Gates have 101 billion because this list is for when peak amount of money reached, which for Gates is 101 billion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.87.40.199 (talk) 00:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have a question 

message: The graph and table do not agree.--131.155.56.90 (talk) 15:47, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graph and table do not agree 

message: The article says, "The monetary amounts are based on the USD of 2006."  But the title says "non-inflated", which means they are the dollars at the time.  So are the figures 2006 dollars or nominal dollars? Billgordon1099 (talk) 00:36, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title and text do not agree about inflation-adjusted dollars 

message: This article needs to be updated.  See http://edition.cnn.com/2010/BUSINESS/03/10/forbes.list/index.html and http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8560731.stm. --82.31.164.172 (talk) 09:54, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill Gates is no longer the richest 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:47, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Anil2.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 23 April 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 03:29, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Ingvar Kamprad.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: What the hell are "non-inflated historical figures"? Blow up dolls of George Washington that someone didn't breath into or something? For that matter what the hell are "non-inflated dollars"? This whole list is an exercise in ignorance and stupidity of exactly the kind which makes people make fun of "the online encyclopedia that anyone can edit". It's an embarrassment. 
Redirecting this junk.Volunteer Marek (talk) 01:38, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with  and see no reason why this article was re-spawned after two years, notably with OR and other tags removed and without "add(ed) sources" as claimed. Reverting edit, if it comes back then time for AfD. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 21:08, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: , sorry complete mistake I was looking for List of wealthiest non-inflated historical figures without inflation adjustment, I know there was a list of this, but it appears to be gone. Valoem talk contrib 21:22, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I was looking for this Valoem talk contrib 21:26, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ignorance