lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:VLS-1 V03

message: Perhaps it should be mentioned that the Space Shuttle also uses solid fuel booster rockets? Mat-C 12:12, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: SRB

message: Is this really an "engineering failure".  None of the references I saw gave any indication of what the cause of the accident was.  -- Webgeer 23:32, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Engineering Failure??

message: 2003 Brazilian rocket explosion? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yuriybrisk (talk • contribs) 12:52, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  rename? 

message: *
*
*
--Stone (talk) 11:13, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is this here, rather than in the article itself? --W. D. Graham 21:46, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Somebody has to read it and put it into the article, an up to now I only got the references and had a very brief look. --Stone (talk) 21:55, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Recently I came across the phenomenon of hindsight bias and I wondered whether this bias might also be present in this Wikipedia article...
According to the hindsight bias, in retrospect it is overestimated how likely, predictable and/or inevitable an event was, and obviously a study has even found it in Wikipedia articles on accidents/catastrophes: doi:10.1007/s00426-017-0865-7
So I wondered whether that could be the case with this article, too, – and whether the disaster is presented as more predictable and inevitable than it actually was before. Maybe we should search again for information that would have spoken against its occurrence?
Apparently, the hindsight bias occurs because of a retrospective focus on information that spoke FOR the event while ignoring (or not taking seriously) information that would have argued for another outcome, which then, of course, leads to the impression of inevitability and foreseeability... This is why I wondered whether this article might 
also be affected by hindsight bias and should thus be checked again for this? --2A02:810D:1300:38E5:61F3:7C52:F3B4:D1D8 (talk) 16:52, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there a hindsight bias?
Talk:Radio Norwich

message: I'm not much of an Alan Partridge expert, but was it really BBC Radio Norwich in the series? I thought it was only referred to as Radio Norwich, not specifically a BBC station. Tom- 12:22, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: It always sounded like the Lisbie sisters to me. Maybe I'm deaf. 92.24.6.109 (talk) 10:21, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nesbitt sisters
Wikipedia talk:Texvc/Archive

message: Here's my problem: I've got a file with a lot of abbreviation which I usually include in my .tex documents. It would be very appreciate if I could include this file in texvc to use it in my wiki.
I've already tried to modify the texutil.ml file in the "let find = function" part.
    | "\\myVar"            -> LITERAL (TEX_ONLY "Oh Cool My Beautiful Var")
and it works.
But it would be very useful to have an include and to be able to modify the file. 
Ponsfrilus 16:07, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  \input{abbrv} 

message: When trying out different colours I discovered that many colours I thought of didn't work. I found out that LaTeX supports these named colours, but some part is still not working on Wikipedia.
So, I guess, Texvc is responsible for what colours are allowed? Where could I see a list of those colours? --Knakts 11:26, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colours in formulae 

message: This isn't an independent program, it's just a MediaWiki extension. Pcap ping 10:01, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it is self-contained and was created by a third party (not a MediaWiki developer) in a different programming language. While has been well-integrated into MediaWiki it can just as easily be used in conjunction with other web software. Even if it was limited to MediaWiki this is not sufficient reason to merge it, just as we would not merge ChatZilla to Mozilla Firefox, etc. — CharlotteWebb 19:46, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Can anyone give me a clue on how to use Texvc as an independent program?I think it is pretty useful to generate PNG from LaTeX code without writing a full document code.--Netheril96 (talk) 16:10, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Asystole

message: somebody may want to paraphrase this snippet relating to CPR and asysole
:"Recognizing the dismal rate of survival for collapsed individuals found in asystole ... Rescuers are advised to consider the quality of resuscitation effort thus far, if atypical or special clinical features exist, and if there is support for withholding or stopping resuscitation efforts outside the hospital. If an adequate resuscitation effort has been made, and unusual circumstances (such as hypothermia, drug overdose, or drowning) are not present, persistent asystole indicates a confirmation of death rather than a treatable cardiac arrest rhythm. Cessation of resuscitation efforts is recommended if asystole persists for at least 10 minutes after CPR has been performed, ventricular fibrillation eliminated, successful endotracheal intubation accomplished and confirmed, adequate ventilation provided, and appropriate medications administered." New Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiac Care Karl B. Kern, MD; Henry R. Halperin, MD; John Field, MD JAMA. 2001;285:1267-1269
Hi, I rewrote the first section to bring it in to line with current 2010/2011 ACLS teaching i.e. atropine out, defib 'just in case' out.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.182.7.126 (talk) 07:56, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The flatline article is currently a trivial stub that mostly discusses asystole, though it briefly mentions EEG flatlines as well. So there essentially two real topics here: EKG flatlines (asystole) and EEG flatlines. To the extent that it makes sense for this article attempts to provide linkage to the articles on each of these it should be a disambig (and indeed there already is a disambig Flatline (disambiguation)). To the extent that this article wants to be about the word flatline, that is a violation of WP:NAD (which is essentially the case now). So this article should either just redirect to asystole or else just redirect to Flatline (disambiguation). I suggest the former since that is what most people mean when they say "flatline". But I am OK with either, frankly.
-- MC  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.131.2.3 (talk) 21:25, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge flatline 

message: This appears to be a mislabeled image -- it is correctly called VF in the text just below, but the image itself contains the term "coarse asystole", which is more of a humorously used term for fine ventricular fibrillation.  Though it is nice to have the unshockable and shockable rhythms side by side, I worry that calling the VF image "asystole" in any way is more confusing than helpful.  I think it's most appropriate to remove it unless the file is edited.
CrashCart9 (talk) 03:34, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Coarse asystole" 

message: Asystole can also be induced by a strong vagal response, where bradycardia eventually transitions into asystole. This could be treated with atropine and adrenaline. 84.58.249.189 (talk) 07:09, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also a very strong vagal response may induce asystole
Talk:World Year of Physics 2005

message: Place for new theories.
:That's fine, however please note that Wikipedia isn't the place to show your new theory. We collect the established knowledge only, but are not the place for creating new ones, nor are a place for publication of new ideas. However once your theory is established among scientists then you're of course welcome to write about it. andy 13:23, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a link to the listing of planned events in the US and here's how to find international ones, but frankly, there's so many that I think it would be better to remove the University of Maryland mention and have just that external link than try to list even just all the highlights.  --Laura Scudder | Talk 07:31, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page is a bit misleading - it claims that the reason for 2005 is solely Special Relativity - however, Einstein also made other breakthoughs in 1905, which were the explanation of the photoelectric effect and brownian motion.
:Very misleading, but it now properly mentions the three papers.  Apparently the author of that paragraph was also under the impression that everything Einstein did was about relativity, so I've corrected the relativity -> uncertainty principle bit and fixed some incorrect wordings.  Maybe I'll also try to dig up more celebrations and external links.  --Laura Scudder | Talk 07:10, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The three papers gave a very big news in three different subjects of Physics. The Relativity (the special one) changes the Mechanichs (as weel as epistemological and philosophical concepts, and of course it has many implication on the whole Physics), the one brownian motion was very important about atomic theory (that despite what is common belived it was not really commonly accepted in 1905), and the one about photoelectric effect was an important step in esplanation of electromagneticism, and with the Planck tournaround of the chaninging of the century led to Quantum mechanics. AnyFile 16:47, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading 

message: Is Miracle year a correct translation into English of Annus Mirabilis? AnyFile 16:47, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the usual way I've heard physicists refer to it in English, despite the fact that my Latin-English dictionary translates mirabilis as wonderful.  — Laura Scudder | Talk 19:19, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Annus Mirabilis 
Talk:Caraga, Davao Oriental

message: The following is posted by User:61.9.117.195 in the main article. (Moved to discussion by Bluemask 13:27, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Star One (band)

message: "Could be described?"
Why not link to something and say how it "is described?"
:Done -- Ra1nMaker 11:59, 17 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:STAR Jalsha which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —BarrelProof (talk) 09:28, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Alvíss

message: Dear Authors,
I think an entry "Alvis automobile" would be very useful. (The company made cars between 1920 and 1967.)
Regards, --Millisits 15:10, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest adding it here - this current entry on Alvis, the company, is little more than a stub, so adding anything about the car building would enhance this considerably, and in fact turn it into an article and not a stub. Incidentally my father owned an Alvis TA21 in the 60s, and I have many memories of taking trips down the A1 in it, and the smell of its leather seats, etc. Half the time it broke down, but those events were part of its character I guess! Graham 23:18, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:President (title)

message: As an occasional non-American contributor to Wikipedia, I've long been puzzled by the US practice of using "President" as an honorific - even when the incumbent is long dead. 
In American culture, is it considered impolite not to do so? And how did this come about in a country that is justifiably proud of its republican traditions?
CallMeHenry 15:29, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why capitalise presidents? 

message: Francis Bacon described Pedro de la Gasca, the viceroy of Peru (1547–1550), as the "President of Peru" in his 1625 Essays (#44). This predates the Commonwealth of England's use of the title "to denote the highest official in a government." It is probably not the first such use of the term though. Richard75 (talk) 21:11, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peru
Talk:Dąbie, Szczecin

message: Some parts of the article history are available at Dabie redirect. Blame User:SzczecinCity for it. I insist that there is no Szczecin-Dąbie in Szczecin. Szczecin-Dąbie is a name of railroad station. The district is called simply Dąbie, (like others: Pomorzany, Turzyn, Skolwin, Niebuszewo etc.). Przepla 15:57, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: As you see, I moved the page from Szczecin-Dąbie to Dąbie (neighborhood of Szczecin) and fixed any double redirects, as well as adjusted the text of the article in the article definition. --Mareklug talk 06:27, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Exponential tree

message: This means that the patent that Xerox has on using hyperbolic geometry to lay out trees encompasses prior art and is invalid.
Has the Patent Office or a court ruled it invalid, or is this just somebody's personal legal opinion? Josh Cherry 16:06, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xerox patent 

message: It would be nice to see an example of an application of this kind of tree, and also some information on the efficiency of it. --Bernard François 17:03, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why would I use an exponential tree? 

message: Three reasons:
* The illustration could be done a lot better, I think it's awfull.
* Probably the link under the see also section of the article should be a reference. It's not a page within wikipedia.
* It says something about the dimension of a tree, while later it talks about nodes having different dimensions. I don't understand this. I added a request for more information on this on the talk page of regular trees. If any explanation would be added there, there should be a link to it on this page. --Bernard François 17:03, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article may require clean-up
Talk:Kyle MacLachlan

message: "It did not seriously damage his career, unlike co-star Elizabeth Berkley, whose career was arguably ruined beyond repair."
In an article about Kyle MacLachlan, it's NPOV to say Elizabeth Berkley's career is "ruined beyond repair", with not even a source?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.231.59.254 (talk) 15:14, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beyond repair? 

message: does anyone know, is Kyle MacLachlan related to Sarah MacLachlan, the musician?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.62.253.40 (talk) 03:34, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Related to Sarah???

message: (Sorry in advance for doing this wrong, I rarely “contribute” to Wikipedia, even to comment on the talk page.)
The sidebar on Kyle MacLachlan's page contains a link to a web page (http://www.kylemaclachlan.com/) which as of today (November 12, 2017) gets “This Account has been suspended. Contact your hosting provider for more information.”
BananaSlug (talk) 19:22, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sidebar links to dead website
Talk:Haleakalā National Park

message: The second section of the park is the Kipahulu section. Visitors cannot get to this section from the summit area; they must take a winding coastal road that travels around the windward coast of the island. 
:This is not entirely accurate, as visitors could go the other way, around through Kaupo, and many probably do just that.  I believe this would save a great deal of time, as well. --Viriditas 22:30, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  As a matter of fact, access by Route 31 from the west is hard because there is no regular road between Kaupo and the park entry. It's just a narrow unpaved road, and car rental companies forbid the use of that way. NPS advise visitors to use the Hana Highway, and then enter the Kipahulu section from the east. The trip is up to 3 hours but the road is a gift by itself (even if windy and narrow too :-) ) --Sam67fr 14:15, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kipahulu 
Talk:Alexander I of Yugoslavia

message: Regarding this edit: I found the book you cited here. But, the book has no mention of a girl being slapped by the king. Can you show me where in this book you have found that info? Vanjagenije (talk) 13:43, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Bulgarian girl
Talk:COFF

message: The link to "sections" is not relevent to object files at all.  It discusses "conic sections", "musical sections", etc., but has nothing to do with object file format sections.
Why exactly is this link here?
:There appears to be a convention used for many Wikilinks wherein a link is made for a term the linker deems worthy of linking, even if the target doesn't exist, perhaps to encourage the creation of a page for that topic.  In the case of a disambiguation page, "doesn't exist" means "isn't included as one of the possibilities on the disambiguation page", again, perhaps to encourage the creation of a page for that topic, with a link from the disambiguation page, and with the links to it disambiguated.  I assume that's why the person who made the link did that.  (I express no opinion here on the merits of that convention.) Guy Harris 02:28, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep. If one were to try to preemptively guess whether it was "section (linker)", or "section (computing)", or whatever, and filled it in that way, if you ended up with a red link, you don't know whether it's because the topic does not have an article, or you picked the wrong name (I've fixed many a bad guess). Better to make sure that the page through the disambig page works and has an article, then go back later and fix accumulated refs to the dab page all at once. Stan 06:08, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Does it worth to mention it ?
see http://www.betaarchive.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=18207&start=100 and http://vetusware.com/download/Windows%20NT%20October%201991%20pre-release/?id=11579 2A02:8420:508D:CC00:56E6:FCFF:FEDB:2BBA (talk) 10:34, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  First version of ɴᴛ used raw coff without any ᴅᴏꜱ‑ᴍᴢ headers.
Talk:University College Dublin

message: This article has to be moved to "University College Dublin". UCD is the common title and the one the university uses itself. The message box can be fixed to accomodate this.
Iota 18:02, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The names of UCC and UCD are definitely a problem - after they requested the NUI Senate to change their names to the current official ones the NUI expressed some concern at the exclusive use of "University College" as the name and the ommission of "National University of Ireland" with regard to UCC/UCD. Wikipedia is not a mouth organ for the NUI but its worth considering - definitely the official names are too long for ordinary passages, but acceptable for the article name with redirect? Djegan 15:21, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: It seems to me that the lead section contains far too much information about rankings, currently 3½ paragraphs. Most of the information should be moved to the Rankings section below. Also, it seems to cherry-pick rankings which represent UCD in the best light. Additionally, it claims that the 2019 QS World University Rankings ranks it as the top university in Ireland, which is clearly not the case. I would suggest for that section of the lead to be completely rewritten. --intforce (talk) 01:50, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. This whole section reads like advertising. It looks like it was written by the UCD's publicity department.Tooth&Nails1993 (talk) 20:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I have removed and rewritten a lot of the introduction. It contained a lot of duplicated information and, for some reason, random italics. I'm pretty happy with it now, but look forward to other the opinions of other users.Tooth&Nails1993 (talk) 21:21, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Great work! –intforce (talk) 23:32, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead needs to be overhauled 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :UCD Olympic Handball and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#UCD Olympic Handball until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 18:58, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "UCD Olympic Handball" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :UCD Hockey Club and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 2#UCD Hockey Club until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.   Jay (talk) 05:30, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Also for University College Dublin Hockey Club. Jay (talk) 05:36, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "UCD Hockey Club" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Behind the Music

message: Removed the following:
:in many cases one that is no longer in the music industry or was not significant to the industry. This is as opposed to VH1's other biography show, VH1's Legends, which profiles musicians that have been very significant to the industry. 
I'd take issue that the artists profiled were "not significant to the industry", and in any event it's not the type of statement verifiable by any objective standard. Ellsworth 17:13, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: This is VH1's way of differing BtM and Legends. Legends has the most significant artists (at least in VH1's opinion), while BtM has the moderately significant to insignificant ones (again, VH1's opinion). We could reinsert the section with such info on it being VH1's opinion and still be objective. The fact that some aren't in the industry any more is, however, perfectly objective. -- LGagnon 18:54, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)

text: You're serious...VH1 considers Willie Nelson and Elton John "moderately significant" artists? What, pray tell, is the cutoff point? - However, if that really is their criterion, I spoze it should be noted in the article. Ellsworth 22:15, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  Keep in mind, this is the same company that does MTV. They definitely aren't the experts on the subject of music. -- LGagnon 03:32, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)

text: Heh-heh-heh, you're right. Maybe we ought to also put that in the text of the article. Ellsworth 13:43, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: i noticed the arcticle stated there its an episonde on blink-182 in production.
i want to know if anyone has some hard evidence of this.
they're one of my favorite bands and i want to see this air.
- I just read an interview where they asked Mark about it, and he said he didn't know about it. So I have my doubts, but I want to see it to. Maybe in the future, but nothing real for now.
68.101.158.227 06:39, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  blink-182 

message: There should be an episode list with original air-dates and production codes.  allixpeeke (talk) 08:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode list 

message: I see the infobox hasn’t been updated to reflect the revival. Why is that?--CreecregofLife (talk) 07:43, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox outdated