lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:New Calendarists

message: you radically changed the topic of the article one year ago. I disagree with your change for two reasons. First, the expression "New calendarists" seems to be used exclusively in references to the debates within E. Orthodoxy about the Revised Julian calendar; "New calendarists" is not used either in The Blackwell Companion to Eastern Christianity or in  The Church of the East: A Concise History. Second, the article is only about calendar disputes within Christianity, not about "people who have adopted a new calendar, thus replacing the previous one, and also people who are advocating such a change within some group." Veverve (talk) 02:24, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't mentioned Serbian Orthodox Church. 109.245.204.54 (talk) 09:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Topic change
Talk:Nones (liturgy)

message: Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
—Yamara ✉ 04:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Time/Assessment|WikiProject Time assessment rating]] comment 

message: Do we really need ALL that detail in the Armenian section? No other sections have full scripts, so for NPOV, either we need full scripts everywhere or nowhere. --Akhenaten0 (talk) 16:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armenian detail 

message: The article is mostly cribbed from a single source that uses "none" but the  form is "nones". — LlywelynII 02:57, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Deep eutectic solvent

message: Seems to me like a duplicate of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_eutectic_solvent ... - as the "natural" des simply seem to be DES with natural compounds - and just a name created by the authors of the linked articles. There is also THEDES - http://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/handle/1822/38328 - because another author said so...
This article is a duplicate to me with no information that the main article does not cover.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.70.170.201 (talk) 11:46, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

message: I propose to merge Natural deep eutectic solvents into Deep eutectic solvent. Natural deep eutectic solvents (NADES) are a special type of deep eutectic solvent, where NADES are made up specific compounds (amino acids, organic acids, sugars, or choline derivatives) see: https://doi.org/10.1021/sc500096j. I think the DES article can have a section on NADES. I have never done a merge before, but this does not seem like it would be controversial and the first step listed at WP:MERGEINIT is to start the discussion, so here goes.DaffodilOcean (talk) 23:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I just put the merge flags on the two pages, with the links to discuss the merger here.--DaffodilOcean (talk) 18:40, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I would have liked to see an explanation about the reason behind these unusual features.  Why can you mix to stuffs and get a stuff with a much lower melting point than either of the starting stuffs?  How does this work?  What is going on?  Joreberg (talk) 15:22, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why / How ?
Talk:Paraklesis

message: I'm pretty sure it isn't. Since I found the term in an academic text in a text made for Norwegian universities, Øivind Andersen's "I retorikkens hage", a textbook in classical rhetoric. Translated from Norwegian, the text says: "...the generals encouragement speech to the troups before a battle (called paraklesis in greek)." Hakinu (talk) 16:43, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Paraklesis only being a Christianity term?

message: The article Moleben is about the same subject this; a few notes should be added to this article former be merged into this. Vincent J. Lipsio (talk) 11:02, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal
Talk:Royal Hours

message: Footnote 4 is incorrect. A Vesperal Liturgy, like a Presanctified Liturgy, takes place on the day that is ending, not the day that is beginning. The whole paragraph to which the footnote is attached should be struck, as it is nonsense. - BALawrence (talk) 23:01, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Saint Vladimir's Orthodox Theological Seminary

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://library.svots.edu/index.php/about-us/history. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:08, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:St. Dionysius Institute in Paris

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect St Denys Theological Istitute. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 20#St Denys Theological Istitute until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 17:43, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "St Denys Theological Istitute" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Sticheron

message: This article, although very important, could be commented in a similar way as the article Acolouthia had been already commented on its talk page. It is obviously a Catholic Orthodox point of view with very problematic definitions which do not really help a reader, who looks for some basic informations about the Byzantine hymn book sticherarion. I corrected the most problematic definitions, but the article is still a stub and needs to be restructured entirely.
Here I offer some keywords, which might help courageous contributors:
*the Studites reform (9th century) and the later book of the early sticherarion with Paleobyzantine Notation, the separation of the book Octoechos (12th century)
*the Papadic reform and the revised editions of Middle Byzantine Sticheraria with Octoechos signatures (14th-18th century)
*the Sticherarion kalophonikon and the stichera kalophonika and anagrammatismoi (14th-18th century)
*the reform of the New Method, its definition of a sticheraric melos between Anastasimatarion (Sl. Voskresnik) and Anthologia tis leitourgias (Sl. Psaltiken Liturgija), and its chant books Doxastarion and Mathematarion (18th-21th century)
Not only liturgical, but also musicological competences are required. Nevertheless, please feel welcome. Platonykiss (talk) 23:07, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the current quality and some propositions for an elaboration
Talk:Lars-Eric Lindblad

message: I am puzzled by this. No intimate knowledge of this country's geography, but looking at a map I see nothing resembling a coast. Perhaps navigating a river into Bhutan would be possible, but something seems very odd here. If there is no source, I'd rather delete that part of the sentence.
--Mariusm98 (talk) 20:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The coast of Bhutan"?
Talk:Hiroyasu Koga

message: Ins't the term he botched the job a little unencyclopaedic? ArdClose (talk) 11:33, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Botched

message: The article says he died in Japan, but also points to this being a biography of a living person. Also, no death date is given.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.116.60.2 (talk) 19:04, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Talk:Big Brother 3 (Bulgarian season)

message: I have upgraded this article to C-Class as it meets the criteria, the article has a good amount of information but not enough yet for B-Class. More reliable sources would be good to improve the article as well and trying to make the nomination table look more like Big Brother 2007 Australia. (See mainly for the nomination points such as if the first person a Housemate nominates is two points then their second is one point) ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 22:10, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgraded to C-Class 
Talk:Boundedly generated group

message: User:arcfrk: The reason Olshanskii was not mentioned is that the Grigorchuk example, while not having bounded exponent, is completely elementary and can be fully explained with proofs on one page. This is not true of Olshanskii's work (as far as I know) which solves a much harder and deeper problem. Is there a very short and simple example due to Olshanskii? Note that the editors of periodic groups omit Olshanskii. Please carry on any dialogue about the article here, not in hidden comments in the article itself. Mathsci (talk) 11:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Automata

message: What is e?  It's not defined, and its meaning is unclear from context.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.111.243.254 (talk) 14:18, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Clarified. Joel Brennan (talk) 19:25, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Symmetric groups
Talk:River Teise

message: Goudhurst
As well as Hope mill, there were the following mills:- Glassenbury, Paley*, Paper, Little Pall, Bedgebury furnace, Chingley Forge, Chingley Furnace, Etchinghole, Triggs. Those in italics were on the Bewl or tribs thereof, Those in bold on the Teise itself. Those in bold italics were on tributaries of the Teise. Those marked with * were on tributaries of the Beult. The others need to be located still.  Mjroots (talk) 12:08, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Watermills
Talk:Malachy Tallack

message: The majority of the references for this article trace back to the New Statesman, a blog for which the subject of the article is writer. If I can't find any alternative third party sources to verify the info I'm going to have to remove all the unsourced info and stub the entire article per WP:BLP. ponyo (talk) 19:02, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: I removed some of the unsourced info and whatever material had been sourced to the blog Tallack writes for. I also added a couple of third party references for the remaining material. Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 20:54, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Gregorio S. Araneta

message: Is Pambansang Komisyong Pangkasaysayan a Wikipedia mirror site, or is this article basically copied from there? Noted 7 (t · c) 19:00, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This article appears to have been copied from the nhi.gov website. I have removed the infringing text by reverting to the version before the addition of the copyright violation.  — CactusWriter (talk) 06:04, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Pambansang Komisyong Pangkasaysayan
Talk:Eaton Socon Castle

message: http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/11147769526/
©Geni (talk) 01:03, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Particularly useful as we don't have any other illustrations for the article. Added. Nev1 (talk) 00:02, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Plan of the castle

message: This article is very brief and should be merged into the Eaton Socon article. Afterbrunel (talk) 11:53, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  On reflection, I think it might be possible to expand it into a viable free-standing article. We'll see. Afterbrunel (talk) 17:18, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done Afterbrunel (talk) 11:59, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Eaton Socon article
Category talk:Named passenger trains of the United States

message: The FrontRunner commuter line was recently added to this category.  I would expect, however, that Named passenger trains would refer only to intercity trains, not commuter systems... yea or nay? Wlindley (talk) 02:02, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That is how this category is intended.  Services that are named by individual train (i.e. the Clocker) and not by carrier or line (as in the previous example, the Pennsylvania Railroad or Northeast Corridor) should be included here. Slambo (Speak) 11:22, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Named trains pertain to a single run (in a direction) of a train with said name per day. Commuter operations like the FrontRunner run several times a day.Dogru144 (talk) 03:13, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Intercity trains only?
Talk:Bow wave

message: Given the importance of bow wave formation as a limiting factor on ship speed, shouldn't this be at least Mid importance?
Andy Dingley (talk) 13:00, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

message: It is not clear from the current text what the boundaries of a bow wave are.  For example, does the bow wave extend indefinitely aft, or is there a boundary on the backward side? Mark.camp (talk) 00:33, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boundaries of a bow wave
Talk:MI18 (Directorate of Military Intelligence)

message: I had a quick look on the Internet for a reputable source but couldn't find any (only forum postings). I suspect that this would need to be checked against a book, as there's precious little reliable information concerning MI* other than Five and Six. The bibliography at the bottom of this page would probably be helpful.
For reference, the line in question is:
:Some speculate that it was a Radio Security Service of the British Secret Service in World War II, or possibly used to collect intelligence on North American countries.
124.148.63.198 (talk) 12:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that MI18 is still classified according to some (not "reputable") sources I have found. Getting any further details on MI18 could be tricky. --Deadly∀ssassin(talk) 00:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MI18 Speculation
Talk:Health threat from cosmic rays

message: Formal request has been received to merge: Health threat from cosmic rays into Effects of ionizing radiation in spaceflight; dated: 16 July 2022. Proposer's Rationale: Both are talking about the same thing, though I'm not exactly sure what the destination page should be named. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 07:56, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no objection expressed to the merge, so proposer, , should consider merging per normal BOLD channel. GenQuest "scribble" 07:03, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, I will do it later in the day. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 07:07, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Theory (mathematical logic)

message: It's interesting that one seems to get System Fω in D4.1.1 by restricting type constructors to arrow type (iii). Johnstone does not consider it in the book though. Pcap ping 04:22, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Fω''? 

message: Given that type constructors in Johnstone's D4.1.1 cannot take non-types as arguments, it looks like it can only generate a plane of the lambda cube, i.e. it excludes LF (logical framework) and calculus of constructions. You could just encode each term as a type as well, but that seems insane. So, in this sense it's not really a satisfactory definition for a higher order logic... Pcap ping 05:32, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I found the categorical semantics of CoC in Jacob's book though, see my comment below that of Charles Matthews in the next section. Pcap ping 09:52, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  But not [[dependent type]]s? 

message: The lede begins
* In mathematical logic, a theory (also called a formal theory) is a set of sentences in a formal language. Usually a deductive system is understood from context. An element \phi\in T of a theory T is then called an axiom of the theory, and any sentence that follows from the axioms (T\vdash\phi) is called a theorem of the theory. Every axiom is also a theorem. A first-order theory is a set of first-order sentences.
The third sentence seems to imply that only the axioms (and not the other theorems) are members of the theory.  If that is not intensional should it say instead, say
* In mathematical logic, a theory (also called a formal theory) is a set of sentences in a formal language. Usually a deductive system is understood from context. Each element \phi\in T of a theory T is either an axiom or a sentence that follows from the axioms (T\vdash\phi) called a theorem. Every axiom is also a theorem.  A first-order theory is a set of first-order sentences.
:This is what the language "Many authors require that the theory be closed under logical consequence", which you removed, was describing. Some authors require that the consequences of the theory must also being the theory; others don't. It also varies by context somewhat. — Carl (CBM · talk) 00:37, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: lede

message: In November 1, 2019, the definition was changed from "... a set of sentences in a formal language", to "...a set of sentences in a formal language that is closed under logical implication". This is not false, since both definitions are in use (see here). But, then, "theory" becomes the same as "deductive theory", and this cause some confusion. So, I restored the definition as it was before. Aris Makridis (talk) 12:49, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the defintion of "Theory"
Talk:University of the Philippines Diliman Extension Program in Olongapo

message: The file :File:UPD Oblation.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:UPD Oblation.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 03:18, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:UPD Oblation.jpg]]
Talk:Pérez

message: Just curious on the criteria for the people list... should Perez Hilton, whose name is not really that, and he doesn't even use it as a surname, be there? Curiosity, really. MaGnUs was here! (talk) 03:41, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

message: The article text describes the common pronunciation in American English as a "hyperforeignism".  There's no source, and it seems to me that it is Anglicized in the most straightforward way.  Anybody know what aspect would be a hyperforeignism? --Amble (talk) 23:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that this claim previously had a "citation needed" tag that was removed without fixing the problem .  I have removed the claim altogether. --Amble (talk) 23:48, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Hyperforeignism?

message: Like Leo Perutz.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.85.148.202 (talk) 18:20, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perutz too? 

message: This surname is Catholic Christian inspiration. Clarification: This has nothing to do with the biblical word peretz or perets (= broken), this is an absurd chimera created by the Messianic which are a group of Christians who separated from the Church. Perez as a Christian surname, i.e. the patronym of Pedro/Peter, i.e., San Pedro or Saint Peter. Pedro or Peter means rock or stone.
Another possibility is of Bearn origin that means the pear tree, or, the pear orchard. There are variants of Perez in Spanish languaje and they are Pêres, Peres, Peris, Piris, Piriz, Pirez. Another spellings ranging from Peter, Pieter, Petre, Petres and Pierre, to patronymics Peterson or Petersen, Petterson, Piterson, Petersone, Peters, Pede, Peder, Peders, Pedersen, Pederstorf, Pedolin, Peden, Pedern, Pedaert, Peers, Pietri, Péresse and even the Armenian Bedrosian, to diminutives such as Poschel, Piotrek, Petrenko, and Pietrusska. There are in the Euskera languaje the following variants: Pedroarena, Peloretegui, Pelorotegi, Pello, Pellorena, Perochena,  Perorena, Peraita, Peru, Perubenea, Peruchena, Perugorria, Perulena, Perurena, Perutegui, Petcorena, Petricorena, Petrirena, Petrorena, Pierola, . 
--Hope 22:20, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perez surname 

message: The article stated that the accent falls on the second-to-last syllable “as with all Spanish patronymic surnames”, but the quoted text is contradicted by the existence of the patronymic “Álvarez”. I defer to a subject matter expert to decide whether the clause should be corrected to “as with most Spanish patronymic surnames” or merely left out. 06:18, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect clause removed
Talk:Eton mess

message: Hi, this article was recently edited "Eton mess" to state that Eton College's annual "Fourth of June" prize-giving celebration picnic  is actually celebrated on the last Wednesday in May. Does anyone have a reference for this? If not, the edit might have to be reverted for being unreferenced. — Cheers, JackLee –talk–</span> 18:23, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the 2008 Fourth of June [certainly will be], and it was on the last Wednesday in May every year I was there (1993-1998). That probably counts as original research, doesn't it? The Eton [glossary] says it's "a gala day as near as practicable to the actual date", and [this page] claims it's "always held on the Wednesday closest to the 4th June". However, the actual 4th of June falls on a Wednesday in 2008, and yet the Fourth of June is a week before, so I think "the last Wednesday in May" is more accurate (this also happened in 1997). Anyway, it should be clear that the Fourth of June is not the same thing as June 4! Ladislav the Posthumous (talk) 23:15, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to "Eton mess" 

message: I've found rather old sources that refer to "Eton mess" and "Eton mess jackets", but at the moment, it's premature to add them to the article.  FWIW, here they are:
* http://books.google.de/books?id=qkc1AAAAMAAJ&q=%22eton+mess+jacket%22&dq=%22eton+mess+jacket%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=q2HMUtH3Bqm14ATumoDYDw&ved=0CDwQ6AEwAA refers to an "eton mess jacket".
* http://books.google.de/books?id=gAICAAAAQAAJ&q=%22eton+mess%22&dq=%22eton+mess%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=XmHMUpz7BYas4ATTyICACQ&redir_esc=y has the text "And Stortford was such a hindrance to all the grand plans himself; Meath believed he would really have liked their" mess to relapse into the ordinary type of Eton mess. In fact, at an early period he gave up trying to raise it to a higher standard" - that predates the earliest report of the desert linked in the article by two decades, so it seems to have some background that isn't yet explained. --Slashme (talk) 20:46, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other uses of "Eton mess" 

message: This word has been around in English since it was borrowed centuries ago from the French word "mets", meaning "dish (of food)", which explains why in the biblical book of Genesis Esau is said to have sold his "birthright" to his brother Jacob for a "mess of pottage": a (mere) dish of lentil stew. The Eton dish may have looked like a mess in the modern sense, but I wouldn't be surprised if the origin is quite simply archaic French-influenced English. The British military terms "mess tent" (where soldiers gathered to eat) and "officers' mess" are surely related to this.89.212.50.177 (talk) 16:20, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "mess"