Template talk:Nsd

message: The source of an image (i.e. the image creator) and the copyright holder of an image are not necessarily the same. Am I correct in thinking that all what is needed to establish the validity of a particular license is the identity of the copyright holder, and that the source is irrelevant here? If this is correct, then I think that the wording in this template should reflect this, and not imply that an image whose copyright holder is known but whose source is not should be deleted. Lupin|talk|popups 03:56, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Establishing the copyright holder is the important part, yes, with the source being used to verify that.  That said, it's a pretty fine distinction to be asking for, when most people can't tell the difference between an image, the subject of that image, the use of the image, and the source of the image. --Carnildo 08:55, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinguishing source and copyright holder 

message: To simplify this template, perhaps we could take some ideas from Template:No copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 00:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idea for a change 

message: Please replace  with .  There's no reason for the template to exist anymore, with the new time function. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 07:47, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it to , because 11-09-2006 gives a red link: 11-09-2006, while 2006-09-11 renders as the user's preferred date format: 2006-09-11. Angr 06:56, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subst {{tl|a week from today}} 

message: I got :Image:Nbc apprentice2 donald trump.jpeg from a private press website run by NBC. I had access to it when I was a reporter for Suite101.com, but have since voluntarily resigned access. Since it is private, what is the use of adding an exact source? Can I get away with just saying "private NBC press website"?  --  Zanimum 14:55, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing private press websites? 

message: 
See User:Poccil/nosource.  I have modified the template so it displays a speedy deletion notice seven days after the specified date on the template.  See this diff for a demonstration. -- Peter O. (Talk) 07:27, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That would place lots of images in CAT:CSD. I think this is not a good idea, the existing categories like :Category:Images with unknown source as of 4 September 2006 are enough. CAT:CSD is sufficiently backlogged already without more automatic additions of images. Kusma (討論) 14:43, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

text: It may appear to be the case at first.  Once the current backlog (not of speedy deletions but of unsourced images) is cleared, a more steady flow of additions should occur.  Until so, my proposed edit should wait.  Another proposal is to change the category for the images.  Peter O. (Talk) 15:42, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

text: This change will break OrphanBot's processing of unsourced images. --Carnildo 19:33, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there a way to accommodate my change and allow your bot to still work correctly?  Peter O. (Talk) 20:48, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed edit 

message: This template includes no pointer toward how to include source information, or further information on the problem.   links directly to Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags, where lack of copyright is addressed.  I've yet to find a good match containing details on how to source an image, perhaps Wikipedia:Cite_your_sources#Images (just created)?  Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Rules_of_thumb?   Even the  user_talk notice seems to lack in this regard.  ∴ here…♠ 08:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help for the recipient 

message: Could someone edit the template message to reflect WP:CSD#I7, that all new images being used under fair use needs all the proper info (per WP:FUC), including source, or they'll be deleted in 48 hours, instead of one week. Something like this:
This image has no source information. Source information must be provided so that the copyright status can be verified by others. Unless the copyright status is provided and a source is given, the image should be deleted seven days after (  ) or 48 hours after the uploader is notified if the image is copyrighted under a non-free license via fair use.
Please remove this template if source information is provided.
Use  to categorize by tag date. Also, notify the uploader with  ~~~~ Also consider adding  to the image captions.
-- Ned Scott 03:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 03:52, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. -- Ned Scott 04:06, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CSD I7 

message: :Plz, add ru-wiki ru:Шаблон:No source. Alex Spade 13:39, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done --ais523 13:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interwiki 

message: I don't know template programming.  Hopefully someone here can help.  
* If you look at an image that has had  on it for a couple of days, the  cut-n-paste helper has the date that the image is scheduled to be deleted.  
* If you look at an image that has had  on it for a couple of days, the  cut-n-paste helper has the date that the image would be scheduled to be deleted if it had been tagged today.  
I think it would be nice to replicate whatever  is doing here. ~ BigrTex 20:27, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date substitution 

message: Please add :th:แม่แบบ:ไม่มีแหล่งที่มา for Thai interwiki link. Thanks --Jutiphan | Talk - 15:35, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --ais523 15:45, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  interwiki link