lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Then Came Bronson

message: The extra information on the show is good, but it needs to be re-written to be more encyclopedic and represent a neutral POV. -- MisterHand 06:06, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay. I am new to Wiki, but I'll get the hang of it.  I have edited the article to present, what I believe, is a neutral POV.--  Luigibob 23:59, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV Tag

message: I've made several changes to the article and removed the tag. All the deleted material is in history, so if it needs to be added back in in some form it can be easily retrieved. Here's what I changed, and why:
* Removed "forlorn" in the description of Bronson, felt POV.
* Removed flowery intro about "The Odyssey" and "On the Road." While well written, it wasn't very encyclopedic and read like original research. However, if we can attribute some of these statements to an external notable source, it could be added back in some form.
* Removed the dialogue. I couldn't figure out how it helped the article or why it was important. If that can be asserted, then this too could be reinstated.
* Reformatted the guest stars information into an easier-to-read list.
I didn't want to step on any toes by removing material, just get the article to a place where we could remove the POV tag. -- MisterHand 00:11, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: March 1, 2006 changes

message: Well, I'm no longer new to Wiki and the changes I've made reflect POV deletes.   Also, the previous edits to OVERVIEW were written like a television review, which were good, yet not an encyclopedic entry. Many deletes and corrections to reflect this view.  Luigibob 03:58, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: January 22, 2007 edits

message: To who it may concern:  Recent additions & quick deletions have been made to the article all in the good name of removing SPAM links.  Common sense should always prevail and I have added the link one, and hopefully, the last time.  The external link is a valuable resource to readers of the Then came Bronson article.  Please do not delete link.  It should also be noted that I was not the one who originated the link addition.  Since the artivcle is on my watch list I was made aware of it. Luigibob (talk) 21:20, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: External links & deletions
Talk:Oakton College

message: Oakton Community College is known as Oakton because it was initially located in former industrial buildings on the south side of Oakton Street between Lehigh and Caldwell in Morton Grove, from it's founding in 1969 until the Des Plaines campus opened in 1980.  The current Skokie campus is at the former location of Niles East High School on Lincoln Avenue and is called the Ray Hartstein campus.
Dropping by the page to add the infobox as per faculty request. Will finish by the end of the week. Careet.marchewka (talk) 23:27, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Elvira's Haunted Hills

message: Elvira's Haunted Hills is a 2001 film directed by Sam Irvin. Filming was done between November and December 2001. The movie made its premiere at the International Rocky Horror Fan Convention in June 2001.
Was it really released five months before it was made? 151.205.183.225 03:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Paul A. Yost Jr.

message: Soembody who knows how needs to fix the succession box for this article. --TommyBoy 06:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Succession Box

message: Why did he banned beards in the US navy and coast guard? Le Anh-Huy 05:12, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Beard Ban?
Talk:Chinese social relations

message: :Well, guanxi appears now in the new version of Oxford Dictionary. We should see its significances in showing the special interpersonal relationship in the Chinese society. I don't prefer a merge here -- Jerry Crimson Mann 06:10, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also object the merge proposal. If it's appearing in a dictionary with reputation, it's not even necessary to italicise the term. (The relevant edits by user:Alanmak were  .) — Instantnood 08:36, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

text: DON'T MERGE. This is a word that is increasing in usage to describe more than simply a subset of "Chinese social relations". --Shannonr 04:31, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that the "merge" issue appears settled, with guanxi staying where it is. --Shannonr 11:36, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Strong Support: I'd like to bring this back up - this article should absolutely be deleted or merged with gaunxi. Chinese social relations, or shehuiguanxi, are adequately described in the "In a personal context" of the guanxi article. This stub provides no additional information on the topic. Additionally, it doesn't really make sense to read about shehuiguanxi without considering the broader concept of guanxi. 李艾连 (talk) 23:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Guanxi?
Talk:Phenothiazine

message: Just a comment:  Adverse reactions from Phenergan and COMBID Spansules or other phenothiazine type of medications that non-psychiatric patients might be given for nausea or nervous stomach or overactive intestines might be mentioned.I did have reaction to COMBID Spansules (by Smith, Kline) many years ago and my legs cramped unless I constantly walked and I had to go to ER. Phenergan makes me so hyper I want to climb the walls. I was told to write phenothiazines on my drug lists for adverse reactions to medications. I always use WiKi and I do not see these medications listed under phenothiazines. And the drug COMBID Spansules is listed with Google but not WiKi. I do not have sufficient knowledge to suggest a specific edit. A scientist might make a correct science evidenced based statement to include reactions from these two drugs or especially the drug Phenergan. I do not know if the drug COMBID is still manufactured. Please notify me if I have incorrect information about listing these two drugs as Phenothiazines on my medical records. 02/19/24 I signed into my account. Thank you. PharoPhan (talk) 01:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phenothiazines
Wikipedia talk:External peer review/Nature December 2005

message: I have just reverted a great number of edits, everything since Feb 2007. All of these edits are by socks of a banned user, some of them are Amorrow socks (revert anything by him on sight is our policy) and some of them socks of a user who probably is Amorrow as well. That may make the essay tag Jeandré du Toit added redundant, I leave that to regulars of the page to determine. ++Lar: t/c 18:16, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large reversion
Talk:Rocket garden

message: The list of rocket gardens is yankeecentric because that's what I know. The list would benefit with the addition of more western European or Russian rocket gardens. Willy Logan 06:37, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Hume

message: I changed 'international' to 'academic' because 'international' is irrelevant (or are we to assume that all internationals are academics?).
160.39.243.156 03:55, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry to disagree but looking at Hume (disambiguation), I recognise some "Hume" articles and notable people but have never heard of David Hume. Archbishop Hume is quite notable, while Final Fantasy fans would regard Hume (race) as important. You can't satisfy everyone, that's why we have disambiguation pages after all. I'm gonna vote to change this back, but wouldn't want to fall into any kind of revert war. I just don't see David Hume being that significant. — CuaHL 20:32, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *While I have indeed heard of David Hume, any twerp who typed in Hume and expects not to go to a disambiguation page where other things called Hume are listed, probably is not looking for the philospher who was brighter than that.  They would of course find David Hume listed on the dab page.  The more precise title doesn't worry me.  Have any double redirects been fixed?  Could the movers of this page please confirm?--A  Y  Arktos 19:04, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Having looked at some of the pages linked to Hume, they certainly frequently refer to the philosopher.  All that means is that some of the editing of the philosphy articles is poor quality; any editor with a little bit of experience in the wikipedia would know the article would be called David Hume, and thus I conclude philosophy article editors are merely too lazy to put in the piped link.  Although I have no objections, I also see no reason to have Hume redirect to Hume (diambiguation).  I will move it back.--A  Y  Arktos 20:08, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *This move revert will require administrator intervention--A  Y  Arktos 20:12, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

text: *I don't think it's about "laziness" so much as the fact that all philosophers refer to the guy simply as "Hume," and we would certainly assume that "Hume" redirects to him.  He's one of the 3 or 4 most important philosophers in the Western tradition, but I barely knew his first name was David.
Done. I'm not sure it really mattered, as long as Hume redirected to the disambiguation page not the philosopher. But IMO admins should do anything within policy if consensus requests it, so I have.
Agree about laziness and piped links, mea culpa on occasions. The whole idea of disambiguation pages is that wikilinks to them should be both rare and mostly temporary (the exceptions being the disambig notices at the tops of disambiguated articles). 
The redirect from Hume (disambiguation) seems quite as harmless as it is pointless, so I'm leaving it there. Maybe we should even update it a few times to give it a history, which may prevent a recurrence. Not quite sure. Andrewa 10:14, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move from [[Hume (disambiguation)]]
Talk:Radcliffe Line

message: , the record shows that you added the problematic bloat on 26 October 2017, while we were already in the midst of a dispute above. And, you broke off the conversation on 30 October. You cannot claim that all this material now represents "status quo". It was already undone by another editor on 28 October, and you reinstated it. Since you made the bold edits, and failed to reach a WP:CONSENSUS, you can't claim STATUSQUO. We still don't have a CONSENSUS. If you persist with retaining the content without CONSENSUS, I will need to report it to the admins. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:56, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status-quo? 

message: Hi User:Dilpa kaur as i mentioned in my edit summary, can you clarify why you are engaging in edit warring behavior to spoil the ref improvements done to this article ? --DBigXray 08:26, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello Team, If the issue here is too much of encyclopedic content for one article then you can always create new pages with the content and add a redirect on top of the section. There is no need to delete content. You can refer WP:SPLITTING and WP:PROPERSPLIT for the details. There is no need to delete encyclopedic content. --Wikishagnik (talk) 14:47, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wholesale reverts to spoil refs 

message: The immediate following of this line with "As a result of these partitions, some 14 million people left their homes..." implies that the line was drawn poorly. Are there any actual sources arguing alternative routes for the border, or is this essentially violating NPOV? --Eldomtom2 (talk) 23:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the line as well as the paragraph following it. Unfortunately, the page overlies on a book by a couple of journalists, for whom the partition appears to have been a drama. There are plenty of intelligent-sounding commentaries that are just sensationalising the issues. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:15, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "However, a well-drawn line could minimize the separation of farmers from their fields, and also minimize the numbers of people who might feel forced to relocate. " 
Talk:Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Lockdown

message: Nowhere on Rainbow Six: Lockdown's official website's weapons page can I find anything about the OICW. I'm tempted to believe it is not an in-game weapon. Here's the link to prove it.
. Go to game info and then weapons. Besides, whoever wrote it seemed to think the OICW had a shotgun upper component rather than a grenade launcher. Cabez 06:56, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the OICW is in the Xbox version of the game and can be unlocked. In game, it also does have a shotgun component rather than a grenade launcher. Seems weird, but true. -albrozdude 04:02, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  OICW 

message: This article completely lacks information on the PC version. The PC version contains no such no-sense features as view through the visor. Furthermore, Lockdown does not feature the "Planning" Phase previously seen in previous Rainbow Six games. Such details have to be added and the article needs to be updated. rohith 18:52, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the PC version? 

message: LOL.. I found a 'Rainbow Six: Lockdown' page floating around, with incorrect info and so, I made that a redirect page to this one. rohith 08:06, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rainbow Six: Lockdown redirect 

message: I have found throught google search there are many different covers for this game.
http://www.pixelrage.ro/magazin/components/com_virtuemart/shop_image/product/rainbow6lockdownps2.jpg
http://www.gameground.de/shop/images/45468_1.gif
We might want to include these LoopyDood 15:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate covers? 

message: The PC version of Lockdown was widely criticized by series fans and got middling 
reviews from publications--this should be included. Hotshot977 00:15, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism

message: "Also, each individual member of Team Rainbow now has their own personal in-game model with clearly distinguished facial features, instead of the same generic masked soldier used for all characters in early titles."
Actually, if you look closely, character models in the early titles have different heights, eye color, eye shape, skin tone, and skin texture.  At least in Rogue Spear and Raven Shield.  I don't have the original Rainbow Six so I can't verify that one.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.232.66.154 (talk) 08:28, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character Models
Talk:Hyundai Scoupe

message: A chunk of the article has been sourced from a Ward's article without acknowledging the source (available here). As there's not much here on the Scoupe, I'll simply reword it and add the source. FuzzyPlushroom (talk) 05:30, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy-paste issue

message: The car was deffinately sold out side of the US though you'd be forgiven for believing the oposite if you read this page. Either the US specific stuff has to go or more info from an international point of view entered, also SI units should be used first with non standard units in Brackets on a Car that isn't American and was sold outside of America.(Morcus (talk) 15:37, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No it was not. Outside of the US is was the "S" Coupe, or Excel. Not the same car. 2600:1700:D3B0:3A00:54A7:36AE:525:F866 (talk) 03:11, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Far too US focussed.
Talk:List of Indian submissions for the Academy Award for Best International Feature Film

message: Where is the information contained in this article sourced from? No list of references provided. Please state source. It is hard to evaluate if the information is credible or not if we do not know where where it came from. Thanks, AppleJuggler 14:56, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Alert:''' Source of reference for the facts stated in this article not given

message: 30th Academy award was given in 1958. And, Mother India is also one of the nominated film of that year. RedSaurb (talk) 11:26, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong info 

message: All 36.252.195.90 (talk) 07:43, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oscar awered india
Talk:Bighead carp

message: I think it'd be great if someone would expand this article. It's certainly a very important topic; it's right up there with Chinese mitten crabs and snakehead fish in terms of invasiveness. Isopropyl 07:42, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have never edited anything in Wikipidia, but this article on bighead carp needs quite a bit.  I am an author on an in-press book which will be the bible on the ecology of Hypophthalmichthys species, so I guess I am qualified.  I'll try to find time to get to it, but I'm very busy these days and I'm having trouble figuring out the mechanics of editing.  But first off, that fish in the picture is NOT a bighead carp.  It is a silver carp. —Preceding unsigned comment added by User:Carptracker (talk • contribs) 
I have replaced the image of silver carp with a bighead carp now, and made several other improvements.  More when I can find the time.  Carptracker 21:17, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand 

message: This article gives no evidence that this species has or may cause any detrimental effects to the environment other than "sometimes" decreasing the catch of rarer or more valuable fish. In this citation, there is no evidence cited that the fish have caused ANY negative effects in the Americas, or that the fish have consistently caused negative effects where they have been introduced elsewhere (they do note several beneficial effects that have been observed), There is no citation after the claim that they are "considered a highly destructive invasive species in the United States", and no explanation for this is given. My conclusion: this claim is the product of xenophobia and nativism, not science.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinus jeffreyi (talk • contribs) 19:33, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Invasive species
Talk:JACK Audio Connection Kit

message: Wow, looks like I'll start the discussion. That flow chart makes no sense at all. EvanR 08:04, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Also, once it is revised, I think it'd be a good idea for an image in place of text. Sam 23:21, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I also have no idea what that chart means --MarSch 13:10, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is that 

message: Does anyone have references to info that would explain whether Jack supports playing audio applications on GNU/Linux to a remote Windows machine that has the actual speakers attached? 71.172.68.78 (talk) 10:16, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Net support GNU/Linux to Windows 

message: Someone has put a notability tag on this article. This seems absurd to me. The notability guidelines for products include the following: "Information on products and services should generally be included in the article on the company itself". What company might that be, in the case of JACK? This is open-source software. There is no "company" involved.
In my opinion, JACK is notable, if only because it's almost impossible to do pro audio work in Linux without it. If we need more sources to establish notability, we should certainly be able to find them. SoCalDonF (talk) 01:09, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. In support of this, I added a mention of Paul Davis's 2004 Open Source Award for Jack (and a reference to the TechRepublic article). Thanks to Jack O'Quin on the linux audio mailing list for bringing the reference to my attention. Ndokos (talk) 01:08, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have added some citations (more are needed, but it's kind of hard to find quotable support for perceived consensus in an open-source culture), and removed the notability tag - this article has issues, but notability is clearly not one of them. JACK has been a key part of linux audio infrastructure for years. I have also tried to demonstrate its role in nudging Linus towards better real-time performance in the kernel.--Nettings (talk) 10:26, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Wonderwall Music

message: I've heard that the album actually starts in the lead-in groove. I skimmed through the article and couldn't find information on this and I wonder if anyone can clarify?--TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 00:08, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead-in groove 

message: JG66, I did not misunderstand. EMI Bombay had a mono (one track) machine, prior to "Wonderwall"; in the very next sentence of the article, it states that Bhaskar Menon brought a stereo (two tracks) machine to the studio for Harrison to use.  This is an upgrade in equipment. The tape machine was not "converted" from mono; the studio itself was. To convert the machine would be impractical (not to mention expensive), particularly when ready-to-go stereo recorders were available. Remember, EMI were notoriously "budget-conscious" (read "CHEAP"). Zephyrad (talk) 05:43, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: "I think you may have misunderstood" 

message: This has been driving me mad: I read, very recently, the NMEs contemporary review of the album, written by either Alan Smith or Allen Evans, but now I just can't find the piece at all. I'm thinking it has to have been at the American Radio History site, yet I can't see it in any of the late 1968 issues when I look now. If anyone feels like trawling through the issues here and comes across the review (it'll be a very short paragraph), please give me a shout. Or add the comments yourself, of course.
I'll try again when I've got a bit more patience ... Thanks, JG66 (talk) 03:23, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contemporary NME review
Talk:John Colepeper, 1st Baron Colepeper

message: Overall, a good article of good length and detail. I think the intro could use a little work - outside of being a politician and the son of so-and-so, why is he significant? What is he known for? If I learn only one thing about Colepeper from this article, what should it be? Then, just add a section break to split the intro off from the main text, and you're done changing this from a Start article to a promising candidate for B-class status. LordAmeth 00:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MILHIST Assessment

message: Which person are we talking about? Because if we are talking about the John, Lord Culpeper (7 Aug 1599 - 11 Jul 1660), this person was not sourced correctly and his parents are incorrect. Also, the name is usually listed as Culpeper, not Colepeper -- that was an earlier form of the name. Culpepper Connections! The Culpepper Family History Site
Meg E. McGath (talk) 19:59, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: John Lord Culpeper, 1st Baron of Thoresway
Talk:Thomas Wentworth, 2nd Baron Wentworth

message: Which ‘Stepney church’ is being talked of…the wellknown Saint Dunstans or not?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:9C97:5D01:FD4A:53A6:7072:40B6 (talk) 00:02, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  “buried in Stepney church”
Talk:Robert de Ros (died 1227)

message: * Magna Carta ancestry: a study in colonial and medieval families by Douglas Richardson, Kimball G. Everingham confirms that Isabella was the illegitimate daughter of William the Lion by a mistress, daughter of Richard Avenel that married Robert de Ros. Google eBook
Therefore the controversy is being taken out -- someone needs to update the Wikipedia trees obviously and use reliable sources because the template for 'no sources' has been on that page since May 2007! -- Lady Meg (talk) 03:35, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isabella of Dunkeld; genealogy upate
Talk:Henry Ireton

message: Can we have the pronunciation of his lastname in IPA? I can think of a few ways it could be pronounced, but don't know which is right. Emma May Smith (talk) 19:17, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation of Lastname 

message: Out of a total Irish population of 1.5 million at the time. I don't know why that isn't in the article. Cromwell wasn't blameless but Ireton was, without a doubt, a genocidal butcher. Engineering mass starvation in a tiny country is no different than killing people by hand. 2602:306:BDA0:97A0:466D:57FF:FE90:AC45 (talk) 07:58, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You'd need to provide reliable sources that explicitly state that. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 00:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: 600,000 Irish People Died Under Iretons Brutal Campaigns