lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hurricane Gordon (2000)

message: This isn't notable enough, and not enough impact to warrent a storm article. Long storm histories only make it seem longer. I vote for a merge. Hurricanehink 15:39, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The impact section is decent...this article could stay if it were fixed up.  Although the storm was not particularly notable.  The writing is atrocious however, starting with the first sentence which is blatantly wrong.  Elsewhere the article is rife with bad spelling and bad grammar. Jdorje 18:16, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected some but not all, you need to point out what errors I made when writing this article because I found little when I looked at it. Storm05 18:27, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just looking at the impact section, over half of the sentences contain an error.  And there's still the first sentence of the intro. Jdorje 19:32, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This patient could live with extensive surgery. It killed the same number of people as Keith later that year. The writing is just a nightmare, I'm sorry. I'm not trying to hurt anyone's feelings but come on. -- §Hurricane ERIC§ archive -- my dropsonde 04:32, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Apparently the 23 Guatemala deaths may have occurred while the storm was just a tropical wave, and thus are not attributed to Gordon.  Even with 24 deaths, it would be 1 short of the cutoff necessary to get on the NHC's deadliest-hurricanes list, below which I don't think deaths alone can justify the article.  Based on the mediocrity of the article and lack of damage...I change my vote to merge. — jdorje (talk) 00:08, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Yea, good work. It could use some preparations and more impact before being upgraded to B class. If possible, could the impact section be split up by area (have a section for Latin America, a section for Florida, and a section for Carolinas)? They are split up already, but not into their own sections. Hurricanehink (talk) 13:16, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: References 5, 10, and 12 are dead.  Replacements need to be found if the information is going to be left intact in the article.  Thegreatdr (talk) 16:43, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead refs
Talk:Zeta Phi Rho

message: The infobox notes the fraternity was founded at El Camino College, a 2-year community college.  Yet the chapter list here and in Baird's Manual (online) notes it was founded at CSU Long Beach.  The history of the fraternity's founding should be expanded to clarify this. I looked for additional information on the official website, but as of 7 Aug 2021, this is not working.
Members: we editors are not picking on you.  We want this article to be improved, by being more accurate, comprehensive, and by writing in more 'neutral' language.  Like an encyclopedia, not an advertisement.  It's somewhat better now, but can still be improved.
I did a little bit of cleanup of the article where I could, adding a chapter list table and reformatting somewhat.  It still needs a historical paragraph and a Symbols section.  Jax MN (talk) 14:46, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of founding
Talk:Perfect Castaway

message: I don't think the game "I never" is intended as a reference to the show "Lost."  It's a very old game.
I'm with you, but the context was very similar. Cabez 05:07, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Never 

message: The cultural references section has had some pretty hefty cuts, including items with direct citations. Does anyone agree with me that while the section needed pruning some important items have been removed? Mallanox 12:01, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Define "important" boffy_b 11:18, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent deletions 

message: you forgot to mention it was hurricane rupaul... "working his or her way up the coast". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.224.5.27 (talk) 19:27, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hurricane RuPaul 

message: Is it really important to note where Joe was sitting? Lots42 (talk) 01:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joe 

message: I think it's way too long, I mean look at it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Perfect_Castaway&oldid=214365576#Plot_summary
I personally think the second paragraph is WAY too long when this is only two paragraphs, I have yet to get a reason to be reverted. Either give me one or discuss this please. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 11:56, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I combined it into three paragraphs, how is that? TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 12:09, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The second paragraph after getting the syn. into two paragraphs. 

message: I'm pretty sure the episode is called "The Perfect Castaway", not "Perfect Castaway." Other than the fact that the episode is called The Perfect Castaway everywhere else, consider: The Perfect Storm + Castaway = The Perfect Castaway. Makes sense, right?
Arcadiangamer (talk) 23:35, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The" 

message: The production section only makes reference to the film "The Perfect Storm". However, the second half (and part of the episode's title) come from the film "Castaway". I'd suggest trying to find a ref, so it can be added. Ωphois 18:19, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perfect Storm ref 

message: Since this article has been nominated for GA, those sections REALLY need to be expanded. There's basically nothing there. Only one line of the reception section actually pertains to the episode, while everything else is a generalization of a group of episodes. A look at the sources suggests to me that the episode lacks notability. Ωphois 17:18, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production and reception sections
Talk:The Sandman: Endless Nights

message: I have no idea if this would be considered significant or how it could be verified, but I remember that on it's first day of publication, this title was featured in the upper right-hand "arts" corner of USA Today.  To the best of my knowledge, it is the ONLY time that a comic book has received that honor.Badbilltucker 15:45, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recognition?

message: I've created a proposal to reorganize the Sandman articles by story arc instead of by trade paperback. My full proposal and discussion on the issue can be found at Talk:The Sandman (Vertigo)#Reorganize storylines.--Marcus Brute (talk) 00:13, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reorganize storylines
Talk:Rugby league in Wales

message: I've added the link to Rugby union in Wales back in.
Although league and union are different sports, they were very much intertwined in Wales pre 1995 (even now to an extent). The union article discusses much that is relevant to league i.e. that Welsh union players generally came from similar socioeconomic backgrounds to English league players, attitudes to players that 'went North' etc.GordyB 15:48, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As long as the union page reciprocates.--Jeff79 02:04, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:XQL

message: XQL as the XML query language - this is surely not the same XQL that is discussed in the Btrieve topic to which this article links? The Btrieve article seems to mention XQL as some short-lived attempt at a language, whilst web pages such as http://www.ibiblio.org/xql/ indicates a lot more life to XQL. Does anyone (who knows more than me about the subject area) have any insight? 15:56, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Contemporary persecution of non-Jews by Jews

message: It seems that most people who want the article deleted are Jews themselves and I did notice that the person in question who started the Deletion vote messaged other Jews to support him. That's funny. We can have articles on Holacaust and we can force info about polograms on articles about cities (example: Iaşi, but we can't have an article that depicts persecution made by Jews? I didn't know there were special rules for that kind of thing. The article offers references. What more do you want? --Candide, or Optimism 15:57, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Anittas, get your info straight, it's called a "pogrom", not a "pologram". Sebastian Kessel Talk 16:18, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was thinking of a polygram at the time. :p --Candide, or Optimism 16:20, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason this article is going to be deleted is not because of the veracity of the individual facts (though that is certainly debatable as well). It is because the very existence of an article that lumps these facts into one unit entitled "Persecution of non-Jews by Jews" is inappropriate, presenting such persecution as a recognized, substantiated historical trend, and is a blatant example of POV. DLand 16:28, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Which doesn't begin to address Candide's disturbing between-the-lines assertion that because Jews are opposing the article, it must be a good article.  Of course we have articles on the Holocaust.  What respectable encyclopedia wouldn't?  Why would there not be mention of pogroms, for example, in Iaşi?  1/3 of the population of Iaşi was Jewish prior to the pogrom.  If 1/3 of the city were killed or deported today, would you similarly claim that including mention of it were unnecessary or somehow POV-pushing?  Or is it just not noteworthy if the people expelled or killed were Jews or maybe Gypsies?  Tomertalk 21:39, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias
Talk:The Orange Show

message: NRHP listed  January 17, 2007  NR 06001063
One of the great weaknesses of Wikipedia is the tendency for contributors to quickly attach precast generic Wiki blurbs to articles before the article is read. Almost one month before the mysterious and anonymous “63.228.93.76” inserted the standard blurb about needing evidence of the importance of the piece, a section had been created which was titled, hold your hat!, “The Importance of The Orange Show”  Maybe “63.228.93.76” needs to slow down and actually read the piece before slinging judgment
Since the importance of the Orange Show was addressed a month before “63.228.93.76” stumbled across this page, I am taking the liberty of removing the blurb due to the fact that it is painfully obvious when the section says: “The Importance of The Orange Show”  it pretty much addresses  “The Importance of The Orange Show”  
Cletus J. "Bubba" Huckabee Jr. 16:07, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never assume that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Blurb wars do not take place at encyclopedias.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.22.93.200 (talk) 01:28, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:John Brown's Fort

message: Should it stay? should it go? I trimmed it a little but should it be trimmed more? What say you, interested editors.... Shearonink (talk) 04:21, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The fact that the roof and windows were gone is not found elsewhere and supports the later statements that the building is not 100% authentic. deisenbe (talk) 13:36, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a pretty modest point, one that can be expressed in less than the 137 words of the quote we presently have in the article. In my opinion, block quotes are appropriate when we want to highlight an important or poetic point made by a noteworthy and relevant person. Quoting a New York Times article, written by an unnamed person, does not call for a block quote. Let's keep things simple, write that the fort was in disrepair, and, then, cite the NYT article. Thanks, Attic Salt (talk) 03:49, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless, there are significant objections, I propose (as I've done before), removing the block quote. We are supposed to be writing an encyclopedia, not pasting from other sources. Attic Salt (talk) 16:29, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section about NY Times assessment of the Fort's condition in 1882 
Talk:Priest (1994 film)

message: hi all im just wondering if a woman can work in the roman catholic church as a priest? 
thank you for your time and il be greatfull if i can get a answear.
lin thompson
-----
Nope.
----
There's an error in this article.  It's not the child molestor whom Fr. Greg must protect with the seal of confession.  It's the victim of the abuse he's bound to stay silent about; she tells Fr. Greg about the abuse during Confession, and refuses to give him permission to tell anyone else about it.  It's the seal of confession with HER, not with the child molestor.
I have updated the page to reflect this. I would also like to point out that Roger Ebert is not an acceptable source on the policy of the Catholic church! User:Smurfmeister  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.188.40.144 (talk) 10:10, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The plot isn't covering various bits to do with the older priest (forget name), how Fr. Greg only just moved in at the start of the movie etc. could perhaps be expanded. - SimonLyall 00:29, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As someone else mentioned above, this was one of Roger Ebert's major criticisms of the film. It has been counter-argued that although technically the Seal of the Confessional may not have applied to the abusive father, it did apply to the daughter, as she told Father Greg about the abuse during Confession and refused permission for him  to discuss it with others.--Muzilon (talk) 09:47, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  plot bits missing 

message: From the "Reception" section I've removed references to the American Life League and the Catholic League, which are predictable and don't really constitute critical commentary. --TS 10:24, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Campaigning organizations
Talk:Subplot

message: This is very similar to side story. Maybe a case for merging the two? Sillyfolkboy (talk) 00:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The two are sufficiently distinct to maintain different articles. A subplot is part of a story; a side story is a whole different story. JIMp talk·cont 17:01, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Camp Muriel Flagg

message: merge as per Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scouting/RulesStandards. Our intent is not to delete anyone's work or to minimize the importance of any article that already exists on the Wikipedia.  Instead our goal is to tighten the information, to make it more relevant and useful for the general Wikipedian.  This article will be absorbed in its entirety to the larger state Scouting article. The newer article will encompass OA lodges, Councils, early nonBSA Scouting organizations like Campfire or Woodcraft, Girl Scouting where applicable, and other ideas as they come up.Chris 06:22, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I worked for a Girl Scout Camp (three years actually), and we were constantly being told not to give out information as to the location of the camp, specifically for the reasons that we have girls from 5-17, and were vigilant against sexual predators. In fact, camps to non-scouts were often described as general and vague as possible in unofficial contexts.
While closed, it appears from the article that this parcel of land is still owned by Girl Scouts, and having such precise directions (coordinates) of the camp make it seem open for vandalism or worse. Did it cease operations as a summer overnight camp, or as a camp completely? If it is still available as a campsite, having directions like this may endanger the scouts. 
If this is true of other camping sites in the scouts wikiproject, policy may have to reconsidered as to including coordinates. While I'm unaware of Boy Scouts, the Girl Scouts Council of the Nation's Capital take it very, very seriously.
Zidel333 06:08, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates safe?
Talk:José Moreira

message: I sugest this page to be moved and merged in the Portuguese footballers category, were it already exists a category dedicated to the same player, José Moreira. Mistico — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mistico (talk • contribs) 16:21, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:World Scout Moot

message: Can anyone please provide a reference stating that the upcoming Moot will NOT be held in Mozambique? That infomation is new to me – it surprised me – and a quick search on www.scout.org did not confirm it. Is it just a rumour? 
130.216.191.184 00:44, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wosm circular #24/2006 (published in August) contains the repor of the World Scout Committee meeting in March where they discussed the issue, and resolved to make inquiries and decide in september. I haven't seen anything yet on the september meeting of the World Scout Committee. --Lou Crazy 23:51, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The WOSM events database now lists the Moot as "Mozambique, To be confirmed, 2009" Zaian 21:18, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  And according to the Circular 42/2006 "the Secretary General [is asked] to present a final proposal [...] to the World Scout Committee at its March 2007 meeting", so let's look for any new information around (at least Scouting Feb/Mar07 issue doesn't tell more either)... FloK 21:22, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  FWIW, the table listing all World Scout Moots  just says that the 13th one will be in 2010 in Africa! --Emb021 15:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Per documents for the upcoming 38th World Scout Conference, the 2010 Moot will be in Kenya and they are taking proposals for the next one in 2013.  Only Canada has put forth a bid for that, so everything should be finalized by the WSC.  --Emb021  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.182.158.153 (talk) 15:40, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not held in Mozambique 2008 ??? 

message: Another question: Might we import the 2004 Taiwan Logo? They state that "reproductions are allowed only for the purpose of promoting the event", but what else than promotion (don't misunderstand me: no adverts, but info) for the "Moot as such" would a picture be? I've no idea if this could go, but I think yes. FloK 21:22, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image Import? 

message: :
#per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Icons#Inappropriate use, which was cited in my edit summary, the flags should not be added-the Scouting WikiProject frequently has to remove them from articles
#it is bad form to remove existing sources in favor of your own. If your sources are good, add them, but don't remove the old sources
#it is bad form to rewrite large sections of existing articles-your text should fit in to the existing text, not overwrite it
:That said, I believe you are a dedicated Scouter, and your hard work is appreciated, if you will work with those editors who have been working on these articles for years, and not against them--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:59, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agi~cswiki
Talk:Apuldram

message: I have redirected this article since there is no indication, apart from the name of a road leading out of Chichester, that the name "Appledram" occurs anywhere. If it does, then the article should give a reference for it. Is this perhaps the pronunciation of the village name? Peter Shearan 16:36, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Appledram appears to be the name of the parish.  It is used for example here.  Morwen - Talk 12:49, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

message: The relevant section from MOS:IMAGES
I have to agree that the Rymans picture looks nice as it is but the Dell Quay at 400px is too big so I have reverted that to a thumb for the moment. My experience from peer reviews is that everyone seems to insist on thumbs. There are exceptions, but not applicable in this article, so my opinion is that all these images should be thumbs. MortimerCat (talk) 07:10, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the advice.Yes, 400px was too large.  However 180px is very small.  I have compromised at 300px.  Apuldram (talk) 13:13, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 
Talk:Shusha

message: In accordance with WP:5P, I claim that this article currently only represents an Azeri POV (previous edits which introduced Armenian POV have been constantly reverted (which goes against WP:BRD-NOT), therefore no one can claim that this article currently represents a neutral point of view per WP:5P2). I have made BOLD edits that attempt to reconcile points of view into a more neutral article:
Introduced neutral POV on the establishment of the city. Considering undisputable evidence of Armenians inhabiting the region for millennia, and the fact that the location of Shushi is such that it is an ideal location to establish a city in the bronze age or even the middle ages, it's impossible that the city was only founded in 1715. It's also highly improbable that the city was founded by Azeris or the Shah, since Armenian presence in the region predates any Azeri or Arabic presence.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by HyeProfile (talk • contribs) 16:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a very long discussion and RFC about that. The present version is based on consensus. Please discuss and reach consensus at talk before making any  changes. Grandmaster 14:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance of Maintaing Armenian Perspective in this Article
Talk:Cub Scouting (Boy Scouts of America)

message: I believe the word is CHIP.  Since the misspelling appears three times I guess maybe someone knows better than me.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.103.146.141 (talk) 15:08, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:   Cyber Chit? 

message: The BSA has created a new rank for kindergartners called "Lion", which appears to be associated with the Cub Scout program. Should we add a section on this new Lion program to the article? --Qutonic (talk) 20:24, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lion Program. 

message: Is someone willing to design a new illustration for the Cub Scout uniform colors? The model is holding up the three finger sign instead of two fingers, and has a yellow neckerchief which is now associated with Lions, who don't always wear the official uniform. A red neckerchief would make more sense as that's now the color used for Wolves, which is the iconic rank for Cub Scouts (hence the Wolf included in the Cub Scout logo). Tostie14 (talk) 15:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Uniform Graphic?
Talk:Richmond–Petersburg Turnpike

message: Exactly where were the original toll booths? --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 16:43, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, I found it. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 16:46, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Scott doesn't go into it on his excellent RTTF website, but the Belvidere Toll Plaza (northernmost) was located at the bottom of a long southbound grade, and was the scene of many collisions, especially involving trucks. I believe fatalities included toll attendants. Petersburg had a similar but lesser probelm northbound. Vaoverland 22:20, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It was a short concurrency, but it was tolled -- four miles of Interstate 64 in northern Richmond. That was almost as long as the part of Interstate 85 that was part of the tollway. One had to pay a toll to enter the short segment of I-64 concurrent with the tollway.Pbrower2a (talk) 15:31, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  four miles of Interstate 64 

message: Is it worth mentioning that the I-85 portion of the Richmond–Petersburg Turnpike also carries U.S. Route 460? NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 22:25, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Component Highways