lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Eddisbury (UK Parliament constituency)

message: This subsection doesn't give any indication of when it happened (or even if it is to hapen). It really does need a date. If the date can be tracked down, it should be then possible to reference it.  DDStretch  (talk) 12:00, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Boundary Review
Talk:They Marched into Sunlight

message: The i in into ought to be capitalized, this page needs to be removed, but a redirect left from the lowercase i page. Wsacul 14:21, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The notability guidelines for books can be found at Wikipedia:Notability (books).  Keep in mind that I'm not saying the book isn't notable, but the introductory paragraph of any Wikipedia article needs to establish and ASSERT the notability of the subject of the article.  Was it a best seller?  If it was say that in the first sentence.  See the notes on the Lead Section in this article; Wikipedia:Guide to writing better articles.  Hatch68 19:01, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: More information is needed on the University of Wisconsin incident-- at least a date, or a link to a local newspaper article.
BobSchacht (talk) 23:34, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional reference needed
Talk:Makariv

message: ВІДМІННЕ МІСТО ДЛЯ ВІДПОЧИНКУ!  В САМОМУ ЦЕНТРІ 8 РОЗВАЖАЛЬНИХ ЗАКЛАДІВ.
Якщо ви приїдете в макарів неодмінно розшукайте Єгора - лідера музичного гурту "PRO4ерк". Вів з радістю проведе вам безкоштовну екскурсію по всім розважальним закладам. Зробіть це і ви не пошкодуєте.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.69.85.14 (talk) 23:53, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Mukeshpuri

message: This page gets vandalized routinely because of some inaccuracies that are exhibited in the content and that is concerning, considering that there are a plethora of users that change ‘Mukeshpuri’ to ‘Mushkpuri’ or ‘Mukshpuri’ and a single user that reverts those changes with vague descriptions like “don't lie” and “Breaking the page is not a minor edit”. Can someone please provide verifiable and unbiased sources regarding this issue? Please be civil and instead of removing this topic from talk, consider reaching out to me or other users who regularly contribute to this page. I am placing a disputed template on this page until this dispute gets solved amicably. I hope that this discussion that I've initiated will get positive and productive replies because the only intention that I've got is to make Wikipedia a better place as many people get their initial information about various subjects from here. Thank you for reading! JoycesUllysses (talk) 18:32, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Its Mushkpuri i have lived there 21 years of my life its Mushkpuri not mukeshpuri kindly edit its name to Mushkpuri 209.160.122.42 (talk) 01:16, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed Content.
Talk:Hatfield & Stainforth railway station

message: "Monday to Saturdays there is generally a train every 30 minutes to Doncaster westbound and hourly to Hull and Scunthorpe eastbound."
How does this work then ?   Wouldn't you get a large accumulation of trains at Doncaster ?Eregli bob (talk) 09:16, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that trains run Hull - Doncaster and Scunthorpe - Doncaster through this station. The trains to Doncaster run half hourly but come from different places, alternating Hull & Scunthorpe. Keith D (talk) 11:52, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Implausible train service
Talk:Thorne South railway station

message: A leap in one year from a usage of 79 to over 100,000 seems extremely high, and yet I've checked the figures and they appear correct Does anyone know the reason for this? Is it a change in service, or the way the figures are calculated? If some citable reason can be found, it may be worth explaining this on the page. —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 22:47, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Passenger usage
Talk:Scunthorpe railway station

message: When I had the doubtful privilege of living in the town in the 1970s, the station wasn't even on a bus route - typical British transport planning style.  
But then this is the town with no parish church, a theatre you could fit in your front room, no amateur orchestra, a library that looks like a factory, (largely) closed industry and where women seem universally to be called 'Jean'.  A town veritably urbs sine cultura.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by T A Francis (talk • contribs) 20:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scunthorpe 1970's 

message: The statement here is that the North Lindsey Light Railway went originally to West Halton. That railway's page says "The line opened in stages, Scunthorpe to Winterton in 1906, then on to Winteringham in 1907 and finally to Whitton in 1910." Which is right? Crooked cottage (talk) 19:53, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  North Lindsey Light Railway
Talk:Gilberdyke railway station

message: The lead says "There are also three westbound services per day (Monday-Saturday only) which are operated by First TransPennine Express, these trains running through to  and Manchester Piccadilly respectively." This would be OK if there were 2 services, but "3 services" and "2 stations respectively" do not go together. Any idea what is meant by this? Keith D (talk) 23:09, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Confused

message: Station was remodelled sometime 1980s-present - obvious change - see two images in article. Anyone know when - plus a source eg magazine article ? Thanks.Prof.Haddock (talk) 11:33, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Remodelled
Talk:Pontefract line

message: Should the diagram have some line going out between Hensall and Snaith that goes to Drax Power station? Keith D (talk) 00:54, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Drax line
Talk:Knottingley railway station

message: 'Knottingley Depot is just south of the station, on the Askern Line.' No it isn't; its east of the station on the Pontefract line (IE from Pontefract/Leeds to Goole. I don't have access to the Modern Railways article from 1966 that's referenced, but if there are no objections I'm going to change this statement and put Trackmaps Eastern in as a ref as well. Perhaps the original intention was to site the depot on the Askern line but it was changed later....? The joy of all things (talk) 21:55, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's in the angle between the two lines. --Redrose64 (talk) 00:49, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of Depot 
Talk:Nikos Xilouris

message: Lead is far too opinion based: "the most renowned and beloved", "outstanding vocal ability", "managed to capture the essence of the Greek psyche, ethos and demeanor", "His remarkable artistic charisma, his appealing physical features (which were also reminiscent of Byzantine Iconography)", "enormous personal affability ("noble in both countenance and decorum" as per the Ancient Greek Ideal)", "onstage presence that Greek urban audiences always deemed majestic, inspiring and dignified", "his contribution is universally recognized among his fellow musicians" etc etc.
Reads like this is a fanpage rather than an encyclopedia
Worth noting that neither of the two sources for the opening paragraph mention anything to do with "his appealing physical features (which were also reminiscent of Byzantine Iconography)". This page is written by a adoring fan
Worst change happened here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nikos_Xilouris&diff=1093923693&oldid=1087943255 by user 2a02:85f:f8ef:6d00:f977:7a59:94b:f2a0.
User later removed the "fan POV" warning back in 2022 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nikos_Xilouris&diff=1094075603&oldid=1094075200 , I think incorrectly
I think their changes should be reverted as this article has lots of issues. I'm new to editing wikipedia so will wait for second opinion before reverting anything myself (partially because I have no idea how to revert) Bugghost (talk) 14:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Decided to be WP:BOLD and add the fanpov, peacock and weasel issues back to the page rather than wait around Bugghost (talk) 14:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening paragraph reads like an advert
Talk:Forest Theater

message: "I think we need to get a couple of contractors in there, fix the bathrooms, the electrical, the ADA first. [...]"
What does "ADA" mean here?-----2A02:120B:2C76:1510:14B4:B943:9554:E344 (talk) 21:37, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's "ADA"? 

message: * Under the Western Drama Society & Carmel Arts & Crafts Club section, the hyperlink is incorrect for Frederick R. Bechdolt.
** Change the setence: "Other Carmel artists who volunteered their time as actors and set designers include: Cornelius Botke, Ferdinand Burgdorf"
** To: "Other Carmel artists who volunteered their time as actors and set designers include: Cornelius Botke, Frederick R. Bechdolt"
Greg Henderson (talk) 16:03, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!  12:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Request - Frederick R. Bechdolt
Talk:Blink (Doctor Who)

message: This article had a GA Review and was successfully promoted to GA quality. The review is at Talk:Blink (Doctor Who)/GA2. — Cirt (talk) 04:31, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Promoted to GA quality
Talk:Wressle railway station

message: 2 platforms?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.8.104.65 (talk) 12:25, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm assuming that you mena "the number of platforms is incorrect: there are 2" - I have checked, and there are two, so I've amended the article. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:27, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Platforms
Talk:Hull to York Line

message: Result was "merge to Hull and Selby"
In fact a  'disambiguation' (short article) is appropriate - since there are 2 historic routes.
This should not be controversial.
I've created a hybrid of disambiguation page and overview page - not sure if it should have a template:disambig or not - if so the use of multiple links is necessary/unavoidable due to the nature of the split coverage.
NB Work on both Hull and Selby Railway and York to Beverley Line is still ongoing - the topic will be coverage in both as it is an obvious one.
Hopefully this is ok
Prof.Haddock (talk) 09:27, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: And please check for errors, thanks.. Prof.Haddock (talk) 09:45, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion - merge
Talk:Pontefract Baghill railway station

message: Can I ask what the green triangle in the infobox against one of the usage figures means. There appears to be no explanation of this in the article. Keith D (talk) 22:06, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Query
Talk:Sean Bonney

message: He is pretty impressive. Michaelritchie200 19:03, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The following statement is completely subjective, and purely speculation: "His ideological drive and energetic performance style mark him out as a leading proponent of this school of poetry." (talk) 04:02, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objectivity, please? 

message: Could anyone provide a thorough bibliography of Sean Bonney's poetical works? Without a list of works, it makes no sense to have an article of this person. At least not if he is referred to as a poet.81.99.193.239 (talk) 04:02, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, although some editors feel it is worth edit-warring over. ——SN54129 13:23, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 
Talk:Sheffield–Lincoln line

message: Should the map not include closed branches and stations as many others do?--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 09:15, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, may I make the suggestion that the map ought to include Market Rasen railway station and thus dispense with the dotted line between Lincoln Central and Barnetby. Thank you in anticipation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.186.20.13 (talk) 21:04, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Mapping

message: "The flat crossing also placed a speed restriction on express trains using the GNR line." Why was this considered to be a problem at Retford but not at Newark, where a similar flat crossing still exists? 87.75.117.183 (talk) 03:06, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retford dive under
Talk:James Laidlaw Maxwell

message: The main body of this article deserves a reference to China. Just because Taiwan was occupied by the Japanese doesn't mean that the culture ceased to be Chinese. It is widely recognized as part of China.Brian0324 19:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is extreme POV.--Jerry 22:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Glossop line

message: On this page there is a section where it states that the Northern Rail class 323 fleet was to be replaced by the class 319 in 2016.
While I can find reliable news sources confirming that the Northern Rail  class 323 fleet was planned to be replaced in 2016 after being moved to the west midlands, I can’t find any news sources saying the class 323 would be replaced by class 319 units.
This news sources talk about the planned removal of class 323s but it never says the 17 Northern Rail 323s were planned to be replaced by 319s.
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/three-commuter-rail-routes-manchester-9914651
 
Rail Magazine also talks about the planned removal of the Northern Rail class 323s in 2016 but never says the class 323 would be replaced by class 319s on any routes that were operated by class 323 EMUs.
https://www.railmagazine.com/news/2015/08/25/likely-removal-of-north-west-323s-angers-user-group
If any fellow editors have any reliable news sources proving the class 323s were planned to be replaced by class 319s in 2016 please feel free to post them here. Maurice Oly (talk) 02:37, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class 319s?
Talk:Borough of Erewash

message: I'm no good at working out pronunciations in IPA, so could someone produce an accurate indication of "Erewash"? Just to avoid that unfortunate "Ear-wash" confusion... :-) Cheers, DWaterson 19:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, nearly a year on I've done it now. DWaterson (talk) 22:10, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: I noticed that the pronunciation key for the town, Erewash is: (), but the pronunciation key for the river, River Erewash is: . I don't know which one is most accurate either way, but I wanted to highlight the discrepancy in case it needs changing. Richard n 00:14, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erewash pronouned differently to River Erewash?
Talk:Hadfield railway station

message: The article says "The station is one of the twin termini at the Derbyshire end of the Manchester-Glossop Line, the other being Glossop"
How can a railway have two termini? 81.156.81.231 09:09, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Er, most railway lines have two termini! This one, however, has three. See the diagram in this article and also the explanation. While Manchester Piccadilly is clearly the western terminus, it is only during the off peak service that Hadfield is the clear eastern terminus, with only two sides of the triangle at Dinting being used and Glossop being the penultimate station for eastbound services, and the first stop for westbound services. During rush hours all three sides of Dinting triangle are used, with morning eastbound services travelling direct from Dinting to Hadfield, missing out Glossop, and with evening westbound services travelling direct from Hadfield to Dinting, missing out Glossop. The reason for this is to provide a three trains per hour service by missing out alternate reversals at Glossop. 83.104.249.240 (talk) 00:54, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twin termini
Talk:Khoda (society)/Archive 1

message: Both transliterations are used... perhaps khuda should redirect here, or the other way around? Currently, more articles link to "khuda". --Merzul 19:10, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Khoda / Khuda 

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 05:09, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-10-10 Automated pywikipediabot message
Talk:Godley railway station

message: Would I be aloud to say with train runs on the track? and history of trains that have ran on it? User:Aviation.expert 18:12, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That information would be better placed in the article of the Manchester-Glossop Line or otherwise you'd have to repeat it for every station on the line. Check the line article and see if you can expand it. NtheP (talk) 17:20, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Train types
Talk:Guide Bridge railway station

message: Don't really see a point to it, however don't want to edit it out without discussion. Opinions? --79.66.82.238 (talk) 17:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No positive side to it whatsoever.  Rip it out per WP:$ "it is generally unnecessary to link the symbols of well-known currencies".  Mr Stephen (talk) 17:41, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Had I noticed it earlier, I would have deleted it, as per WP:BOLD :-)  Now we've had a discussion, so I'll be bold in/for a minute and delete the link.--Jotel (talk) 18:56, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GBP link 

message: The article as it stands suggests (with no source to back it up) that since May 2018, peak-hour trains exist from Guide Bridge to Marsden and Huddersfield (presumably calling at Stalybridge on the way).
A limited number of peak hour only Northern service are routed through Guide Bridge between Manchester Piccadilly-Marsden/Huddersfield and call at the station following the May 2018 timetable.
However, the May 2018 timetable change was a complete farce and some of the planned changes have still not been put in place. A look at the National Rail Enquiries journey planner suggests that the only option for travel directly between Guide Bridge and Stalybridge is the weekly train to/from Stockport - even after the May 2020 timetable change (which is of course provisional at this stage due to possible COVID-19 related changes). If anyone can supply a source that shows there have regularly been direct trains between Guide Bridge and Stalybridge (and beyond) in either direction at any point since May 2018 that would be very handy! Otherwise, this should probably come out of the article. --Peeky44 What's on your mind? 12:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peak hour trains to Marsden
Talk:Ardwick railway station

message: I'm pretty sure that there were once platforms on the WCML (ex-London & North Western) lines at Ardwick, and that they were closed in 1902. Can anyone confirm this? Tonythepixel (talk) 19:58, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main Line platforms 

message: The article as it stands states that "Access is from a footbridge, so wheelchair access is impossible". However, as footbridges can be equipped with lifts, this seems like an odd statement to make. Clearly what is intended is to communicate that the footbridge in this case does not have lifts - but it could also be read as meaning that for some unstated reason that this particular footbridge could not possibly be equipped with lifts. This would actually be pretty notable if verifiable. Can anyone shed light on the actual intent of this sentence or supply a source? --Peeky44 What's on your mind? 23:05, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Reworded, hopefully all happy. MisterVodka (talk) 20:14, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wheelchair access
Talk:Fairfield railway station (England)

message: I've added on about the fact that at one point, this station had six numbered platforms - the remnants of the others can still be seen, although are mostly hidden in the undergrowth.
The tale I was told by my grandfather (an ex-British Rail employee) was that the station was redeveloped in the 1950s in anticipation that a motor racing venue would be built nearby, hence six lines would be needed instead of the original four (2 for local, 2 for fast, 2 for special services to serve the motor racing).  The racing venue went to Aintree Racecourse instead and the extra two platforms never used.
I have absolutely no idea how true that story is and can find no references to back it up - but I'm adding it here in case anyone else has heard the tale.  There is a link in that Droylsden is one place which claims to be the home of speedway.
Bods (talk) 15:18, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Six platforms 

message: The more I read this article, the more the following statement grates on me: "For a suburban station, Fairfield has very low passenger usage (see figures right)."
Firstly, I'm not convinced that stating something then referring to another part of the page (in this case the infobox) for the justification is best practice. Secondly, I wonder if this statement may now be out of date as the infobox states that Fairfield had 41,000 passengers in 2018/19, the last year data is available - and that's approaching double the number from 2014/15. Finally, I think this breaks the Manual of Style guidance on WP:WHATPLACE - because it states that this is low usage for a suburban station, but doesn't define the scope. Are are looking at all suburban railway stations (in which case it would be much higher than many), all suburban stations in the UK or in GB (which will be skewed by places like London and Glasgow) or is this comparison intended for just Greater Manchester suburban stations? Does this comparison in any way account for level of service? I would prefer to see this expressed as a comparison with other similarly-situated stations in Greater Manchester and/or the UK. A few examples that spring to mind would be  (usage about half),  (usage 10x higher),  (usage 20x higher) or  (usage 10x higher) but there are probably some others that are more appropriate (other than Moses Gate). --Peeky44 What's on your mind? 14:55, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "very low passenger usage"
Talk:Marple railway station

message: This section, moved here from the article, reads like original research and is not presented in an encyclopedic manner.
:==Services (Opininon)==
:If you should require to use the service this station provides on a regular basis for commuting to Manchester, give yourself ample time, at least an hour, instead of the journey estimate of around 28 minutes.  If you require to travel to stations other than Manchester along the line during peak times, you may find that impossible.
Slambo (Speak) 11:25, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research
Talk:Strines railway station

message: Careful examination of OS maps, both 1:25000 and 1:50000, shows the Stockport/High Peak boundary running along the north-eastern side of the railway line, and the red circle representing the station is on the Stockport side of the boundary. Where is it recorded that the station is in Derbys? --Redrose64 (talk) 20:08, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right, modern maps show the station is (just) within Greater Manchester. I guess the confusion arose because the county boundaries have moved as shown in this map for example. -- Dr Greg  talk  21:27, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Any pre-1974 map will show different boundaries compared to current maps; I don't know whether there have been boundary changes in the vicinity of this station since 1974 - might be interesting to discover if there have been. Since Wikipedia generally describes the current situation, I shall reword the bits mentioning Derbyshire. The  banner above can stay, I think, because of the historic association. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:55, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I just found this discussion, as I looked at a Manchester A-Z I have from the 1990s which shows the station in Derbyshire, however the boundary change order linked took effect from April 1994 since when the station has been in Stockport borough.  4shires (talk) 22:12, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Derbyshire
Talk:Princess Cecilie of Greece and Denmark

message: She’s listed as a President of Greece and Denmark about fifty years after her death, and is given an age of 111 - she’s been dead since 1937!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheJamesifer (talk • contribs) 18:59, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What’s up with her info box?