lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Supreme Court of Korea

message: Started the article.  You might not want to link to it yet, since it's still a (very) rough draft.  Also, I would appreciate any help anyone would like to give.  Cheers.  --Zonath 04:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: nice job. in case you haven't seen this yet: http://countrystudies.us/south-korea/63.htm. Appleby 16:13, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: I'm sensing a recurring theme throughout this Wikipedia article where the Supreme Court is described as not having the power of judicial review. My best guess is that this is a translation of the Korean word 사법권. Nevertheless, they both mean, quite literally, the ability to review the legality of cases brought to court (including government actions), which wouldn't make sense for the Supreme Court not to have. I'm not a modern Korean history expert, so I don't know if the first constitution of Korea drastically limited the Supreme Court's power of judicial review, so if that's the case, please explicitly state which part of judicial review was limited in the article. In the meantime, I will be looking over the article and removing all out-of-place mention of "power of judicial review".
My working theory is that it was meant to be the power of constitutional review, which is related to judicial review but not every court has it. I think we should make the distinction between the two very clear, as it can be extremely confusing if they're conflated. I'll be cleaning up the article a bit in the coming weeks but, my fellow Wikipedians, I urge you: Please avoid using the two interchangeably Jourdy345 (talk) 23:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of "without power of judicial review"
Talk:GCN

message: The Genesis Communications Network is not owned or operated by ABC, and ABC does not have editorial control over its content. GCN uses ABC satellite and hardware services to carry programming to its affiliates. The ABC satellite services include the USA Radio Network newsfeed, which they have the option of airing on not airing. Victor Thorn and Lisa Juliani's article alleging that GCN is an ABC affiliate does not bring up any relevant and/or substantiated evidence that supports their claim. In fact, the article presents no evidence that GCN is an ABC affiliate. They merely make the accusation, then make a series or irrelevant claims, none of which are followed by sources (aside from a few irrelevant quotes from acquaintences). If ABC is actually more than just a satellite carrier to GCN, and ABC does have editorial control over GCN's programming, Thorn and Juliani's article does nothing to prove it. - John Watson, April 25, 2006.
:Thanks for your interest. I have changed the disambiguation page according to the guidelines. That information should go in the article itself (once it is created), and not in a page where the casual user may arrive looking for help. -- ReyBrujo 04:17, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GCN and ABC

message: * GCN (formerly "Government Computer News"). --Djadjko (talk) 03:10, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other sites
Talk:Chase the Devil

message: Does anyone know the exact lyrics to this song? They're so difficult to understand (at least for me, a native speaker of American English). I'm fine up to "Satan is a [evilest? evilous?] man, and him can..." but then I'm just lost. I'd be grateful for any transcription or explanation. —Keenan Pepper 04:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "the devil is everything negative in our minds"
Obviously the article should defer to the current first-person source, but is the song really about telling "everything negative in our minds" to leave the country and take the bombs and guns with it?
There may be a more complex context behind why this was offered in a BBC interview. ExtremeSquared (talk) 23:05, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning / BBC Interview
Talk:Snyder Rini

message: The reference "Riots in response" is no longer available as a link. I am not sure what to do in this situation, and also unsure whether or not the target will later become available. Perhaps this reference should be removed. --Pyrofysh 04:13, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I substituted another source. Obviously links to The Australian don't last long, so I'll avoid them in the future.-gadfium 04:38, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can the PMship really be said to be "vacant"?  In the Westminster system, doesn't the resigned PM usually stay on in a caretaker capacity until a new one can be elected? --Jfruh 14:22, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think Snyder Rini is acting in a caretaker capacity at present. He may be in hiding.-gadfium 19:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

text: He is formally Prime Minister until replaced. --cj | talk 07:19, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I was wrong; he is acting in a caretaker capacity according to Radio NZ news this morning.-gadfium 00:05, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  PMship vacant?
Talk:Carl Kiekhaefer

message: The word "Marine" was not used for Kiekhaefer's outboard motor company name or product brochures until long after Brunswick absorbed it, many years after Kiekhaefer's involvement in NASCAR racing ended. The name on the front cowl of every engine, and on dealer signs, product brochures, and replacement parts packaging until then was Kiekhaefer Mercury. I was a teenage Mercury owner/user beginning in 1962, collecting and committing to memory every brochure I could get my hands on during the 60s, and began my career as a mechanic at the local Mercury franchised dealer in 1969. I visited the Fond du Lac plant in 1970. I raced in OPC G class with a 1970 80HP model, and had that boat with it on the cover of Propeller Magazine fully airborne in Miami Marine Stadium on a day with very strong wind from the west making the course too rough for decent racing. I don't remember when Kiekhaefer was removed from engine's front covers, but it was many years after the Brunswick acquisition, possibly as late as the 1980s. Mrmazda (talk) 08:36, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  article could use some tidy
Talk:Fibonacci's identity

message: 1. Let me adjust my previous comment about identity F(n-1) * F(n+1) = (-1)^n + (Fn)^2. Only some people call it Fibonacci's (because of Fibonacci's numbers), majority calls it Cassini's. Thus, until I (or anyone) find a definitely clarifying source I have to admit that there exist justification for calling "sum of two squares identity" Fibonacci's.
2. On merging of two articles (Fibonacci and Brahmagupta). I think we have 3 valid choices:
*either we can leave both articles as they are
*or we can expand Brahmagupta article to include generalized form of his identity and add a reference to Brahmagupta article from Fibonacci's
*or (better yet) we can make both articles to be just redirects to combo article "Brahamagupta and Fibonacci identities" in the same fashion as "Cassini and Catalan identities".
What do you think?
:--Alextalk 14:13, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cassini's identity
Talk:Filip Müller

message: I would like to know the motivations of the person who included this snippet, source and all, in the article. He doesn't explain the context and just leaves it there as a statement, what is this supposed to achieve in the mind of the average reader except bewilderment? I suggest this should be removed unless more context is provided. I don't see how it adds anything useful to the article in any way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a02:8388:500:df80:71e4:75de:11a9:e465 (talk • contribs) 06:04, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Toddst1 (talk) 22:45, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eating Cheese
Talk:Through-hole technology

message: While bending both leads 90degs on resistors is popular, just bindong one of them 180degs has also been used on numerous boards
82.31.207.100 (talk) 14:59, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead bending 

message: *
:Northamerica1000(talk) 13:53, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Find sources
Talk:Shrink ray

message: I remember looking for this article a while back. This article is going to be huge pretty soon.RiseRobotRise 04:46, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wow

message: I don't see why there is a section to also see star wars weapons. This appears to imply that star wars has a type of shrink ray. Unless one can give me an example for star wars or the other ones i'm deleting them. If you find an example you can put them back in. also, what about the incredible shrinking woman? it's been a while since i've seen movies like that... was a shrink ray used in those? b_cubed 16:37, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Need of correction

message: Does anyone know the movie where a ship is shrunk and sent inside a man's body? - BlackWidower 00:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Children of the Corn II: The Final Sacrifice

message: I edited this article so that Scherrer didn't link to the Swiss Physicist.Ingres77 04:54, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Paul Scherrer

message: Tidied up most of the spelling errors/grammatical mistakes, might have missed a few, more importantly removed most of the 'I love this film'-style comments... someone really, really wants me to buy this on DVD. NeilSenna 00:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Who wrote that, the Director?

message: I'm just going to copy across the same text I just wrote on the Talk page for Children of the Corn: Revelation. I have tried to contact the editor directly but they seem to be on a different IP address every time they edit, so never receive my messages.
I appreciate the amount of work that's gone into expanding the Plot section, but please spell-check what you enter and make sure it makes sense. Also, the Manual of Style for WikiProject Films recommends that plot summaries are 400-700 words long, and the current plot summary for this film is around 900 words long, which is completely unnecessary. Please try to keep to these guidelines. It's supposed to be a summary of the plot, not an exact description of every small occurrence in the film. Thanks. Somno (talk) 07:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: The VHS version of Children of the Corn 2 had a different intro song. The song was called We Are Waiting and was performed by children. Present-day versions of Children of the Corn 2 does not contain the original intro song.  BrandonLee83 (talk) 11:49, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro Music 

message: Currently the article says the film was first released in October 1992 in Germany, but I've been unable to verify this. According to the AFI the first screening may have been at the Dylan Dog Horror Fest III in Italy in 1992. I've put a citation needed tag for now. David Palmer aka cloventt (talk) 09:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release Date
Talk:Hancom

message: The ThinkFree website claims that ThinkFree Corp. makes ThinkFree Office, while other places on the web say Haansoft Corp. makes ThinkFree Office. Could someone clarify this situation? —Tokek 08:38, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Haansoft owns many companies, ThinkFree Corp. is int'l company that owned by Haansoft which only deals with ThinkFree Office suite. --Korsentry 05:19, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ThinkFree Corp. vs. Haansoft Corp. 

message: A substantial portion of the article was copied verbatim from the "Hancom takes vision of independence" link. It should be rewritten especially for copyright reasons.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.125.78.77 (talk) 07:39, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism 

message: A series of recent edits have removed critical information from this page. The following factual statement was removed, "In May 2017 Hancom lost a lawsuit in US Federal Court for violating the GNU GPL license as a consequence of using the source code of PostScript and PDF interpreter Ghostscript." The sheer number of edits makes it difficult to revert. It should be considered vandalism! 67.60.109.13 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 15:27, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Spintendo  20:33, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  GPL Violations 

message: * What I think should be changed:
* Why it should be changed:
* References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):
Kelseyye (talk) 08:30, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Spintendo  20:33, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request
Talk:Humax

message: According to this German website: http://www.buese.com/tipps-tricks/16-materiallexikon-klimamembranen
Humax is also the brand name of some clima active membrane material.--79.212.62.36 (talk) 21:13, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clima active membrane material?
Talk:Refunding Certificate

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:US-$10-RC-1879-Fr-214.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 26, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-05-26. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:US-$10-RC-1879-Fr-214.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: The article states:
:In 1907, Congress passed an act that ended the interest accrual of the certificates, and fixed the value of them at $21.30, over twice their face value. By January 1, 1885, all but $260,000 (99.4%) in face value had been redeemed, and since that time most others have met the same fate.
The original version of the page said:
:However, in 1907, Congress passed an act that ended the interest accrual of the certificates, and fixed the value of them at $21.30, over twice their face value. Needless to say, by January 1, 1885, all but $260,000 in face value had been redeemed, and since that time most others have met the same fate.
The "Needless to say" suggests that the second sentence is a consequence of the first, which only makes sense if one of the dates is incorrect: e.g. if 1907 were changed to 1877, or if 1885 were changed to 1908. jnestorius(talk) 15:11, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Also wondered about this. Searching for it, the 1907 date seems well established (would be interesting to track down the act of Congress). I can't find anything for 1885 that isn't just a repeat from this page, but then again don't have access to the sources mentioned at the end. My thought is that it's just very badly worded and ordered, rather than a typo. ‑‑YodinT 09:03, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  please can you confirm your source for the 1885 fact? ‑‑YodinT 20:55, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  1907, 1885 

message: The percentage in this sentence does not make sense: "By January 1, 1885, all but $260,000 (99.4%) [sic] in face value had been redeemed, and since that time most others have met the same fate." Shouldn't the percentage be ".6%"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Autodidact1 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Percentage does not make sense
Talk:Hyundai Card

message: The roman font for the hanja field in the infobox looks very strange. Please fix. Badagnani 00:15, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange font

message: I've made a lot of changes to this article. I've removed unfounded claims, irrelevant information, and rewritten sections which appear to be like an advertisement.
Are we ready to remove the banner?  Itzybella8 (talk) 07:25, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove banner?
Talk:Jeff Suppan

message: Suppan hit his first Major League Home run off of Steve Trachsel, not Kris Benson. Darwin's Bulldog 05:23, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suppan's first Major League Home run

message: How come the Brewers current roster template at the bottom has no option to edit it? There are clearly problems that need to be updated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dshibshm (talk • contribs) 19:25, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing the template 

message: After the first sentence or two it seems like this paragraph is just a bias defense of Suppan. Thoughts? -Philatio (talk) 23:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political Involvement 
Talk:Pluto Records

message: I have removed the Proposed deletion for this article. As stated above, it is notable enough for mine and should go through Articles for Deletion. Capitalistroadster 07:02, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod removed
Talk:Scars & Memories

message: GregVersion2 05:13, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Trial (Dilbert episode)

message: this isn't too long is it? Tobias087 05:14, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Malcolm Turnbull

message: The original refs for this section, such as the Solomon Times article, are no longer available. There is also a 2009 article by Linda Silmalis, originally in The Sunday Telegraph, which is now behind the News Ltd. paywall. Just after it was published, the entire article was reposted on a blog site, which appears reputable, so I've added the ref. Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 07:03, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Axiom Forest Resources

message: Kevin Rudd appointed Julia Gillard as his deputy NOT Julie Bishop. 2001:8003:8885:D700:91ED:2CC8:93E6:F47F (talk) 01:46, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are referring to the infobox, and that is how it's supposed to be. Jack Upland (talk) 02:59, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kevin Rudd appointed Julia Gillard as his deputy NOT Julie Bishop.
Talk:Hückel method

message: What sort of clean-up or attention does it need? It needs more information, but it is a perfectly clear stub. --Bduke 05:53, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This improves the article considerably. Well done indeed. I have made a small change. It is not correct that the pi electrons are lower in energy than the sigma. In benzene, for example with ab initio calculations, the degenerate pi is the HOMO, but the next one down is a sigma. Huckel just uses sigma-pi separability which is based on symmetry considerations, not energy considerations. BTW, I am the author of most of the external link to Hückel method @ chem.swin.edu.au and in particular the Huckel code that allows people to do simple Huckel calculations. Do you think we should make the link to the actual calculator page more explicit? At some point I may want to move that link to another server here in Melbourne but the Swinburne one is fine and the person who runs the server there (also an author of those comp chem materials) knows there is a link to it here on WP. --Bduke 22:13, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent expansion

message: It seems to me that the external link is a dead one. 
May be it's a temporay network problem. Anyway I could not test the www.chem.swin.edu.au calculator.
I would like to suggest to add links to any (or both) of these two Java applets that can be interesting too (both can be accessed freely).
HuLiS http://www.hulis.free.fr  which I am currently developping 
SHMO  http://www.chem.ucalgary.ca/SHMO/ which was developped about 10 years ago by A. Rauk
Because I am concerned in HuLiS progresses, the WP policy does not allow me to add these links myself. 
Any comment about this?
--Humbel (talk) 15:12, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to calculator

message: If we allow all anon users to make this kind of edits (deletions) wikipedia would soon cease to exist. The offending lines have been enjoying consensus among editors for some time now. Deletion should be discussed in talk first. Any comments? V8rik (talk) 17:19, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. "alpha is an ionization energy, beta is the energy of the pi stabilization", the edit summary used by the IP editor, is incorrect. Alpha and beta are what we want them to be, essentially. They hid a multitude of sins. The great strength of Huckel theory is that they are not defined. --Bduke  (Discussion) 21:55, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  128.227.3.193 edits
Talk:The Moody Boys

message: The assertion that Cauty was a member of the Moody Boys has been tagged as "citation needed" since at least February 2007, and I asked for a source on this talk page back in April 2006. I suspect the notion that Cauty was a member came from Lazlo's discography, although he did state he didn't know for sure if Cauty was ever a member at all. Of course, it might also be true.
I've done the best I can to try and clear this up by presenting the sources I have found: 2 articles from reputable publishers (written, alas, after this article made the assertion so we cannot be certain beyond reasonable doubt they didn't lift it from here). AllMusic don't mention Cauty by name. Cauty is listed separately from the Moody Boys as a producer on one of their releases, and he did not appear in their 1991 Peel Session.
I have tried to be careful to present the sources as I find them without editorialising; on the other hand I don't wish to give readers incorrect information so I have noted in the infobox that Cauty was probably just a collaborator. A copyedit is of course welcome, as are more sources - in particular, reputable bios pre-2006 (ideally from the time) which state one way or another if Tony Thorpe is the Moody Boys or if at some point Jimmy Cauty was a member too. I suspect the former is the truth. It's a bit of mystery like Alex Paterson's involvement with the KLF; I can only imagine that with Trancentral being a squat with a recording studio, and reputedly something of a party house, there was a lot of cross-pollination, with Jimmy helping out/working with Alex and Tony and vice versa.
The article also needs some work on Thorpe's activities since 1994. It appears he resumed releasing records in the 2000s and is still active as a live act or DJ under the Moody Boyz name. --kingboyk (talk) 04:37, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Membership status of Jimmy Cauty
Talk:Pocketknife

message: I cannot help noticing that the 'beauty pagent' of specimens seems to only include North American varieties. There are many others, from the UK there are many traditional knives: sheepfoot (plus lambfoot), Ettrick, pruner, peach-pruner, fruit-knife (silver bladed), and from France the Lagiole, Capuchadou etc. Would be good to see some of these. Urselius (talk) 12:12, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-American knives
Talk:Efron's dice

message: Revision by 82.128.200.53 changed die D from 5/5/5/1/1/1 to 5/5/1/1/1/1.  So my picture is apparently wrong.  I very much desire to hurt this person right now. ~ Booyabazooka 06:11, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe I've gotten it right now, although this might not be the best way to visualize the last die.  Does it look intuitive enough? ~ Booyabazooka 06:49, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dice image

message: I've rewritten this description of the game:
:We play x rounds, and we count how many times I beat you on each round (x being a reasonably large number, at least 10). After the pre-established number of rounds, we count the "wins", and whoever has more wins the game. Under these circumstances, I can ensure I will win virtually all games.
and I have omitted the bit about playing a set number of rounds.  That seems overly complicated and not particularly relevant to the mathematical principle these dice are supposed to demonstrate.  Is there any evidence that Efron specifically designed a game with these rules?  ~ Booyabazooka 07:51, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Re: omitting the bit about playing a set number of rounds. But isn't the point to "guarantee" winning? How much would you wager given only the 2:1 odds? Ewlyahoocom 22:17, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree with the change you made; "ensure" was just an oversight, left over from the old text.  There is no "guarantee" of anything. ~ Booyabazooka 22:38, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The game