lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of extreme points of India

message: Nicobar_Islands says that Indira point was southern most point of india only till 2004 tsunami. i am not reverting the edit now, but waiting for further response.nids(♂) 20:41, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article on Indira Point has more information.  It states that it was submerged but expected to reappear.  Whether this has yet happened is unclear, but perhaps this would be better served by a footnote. Warofdreams talk 02:22, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Nicobar_Islands]]

message: Thank your for trying to NPOV this page, but your going too far without watching if your edits make grammatical sense in your urge to deface Jammu and Kashmir into Indian-administered Kashmir. The debate of the usage of Indian-administered Kashmir vs Jammu and Kashmir should be discussed elsewhere, and I suggest you bring it up on a more relevant page. Indian-administered Kashmir redirects to Jammu and Kashmir unlike Pakistan-administered Kashmir. Your edits are hilarious and inane This particular edit refers to Arunachal Pradesh. Yet you twisted it to bring it into the Kashmir fold. =Nichalp «Talk»= 16:45, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. I am honoured to be in your bad books. Now kindly do something constructive or get lost. =Nichalp «Talk»= 06:02, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't mean to sound partisan, but why *is* the administrative entity over Karakoram Pass listed as Indian-administered Kashmir and not Jammu and Kashmir? There is no political entity that calls itself Indian-administered Kashmir. In my opinion, the claim can and should be left as disputed, but the "Indian-administered Kashmir" phrase is going beyond what NPOV requires, and should be changed to use "Jammu and Kashmir," the name of the Indian state. For example, the Extreme points of Pakistan article uses the phrase "Gilgit-Baltistan," not "Pakistan-administered Kashmir" and rightfully so, as only one country in the world, India, refers to Gilgit-Baltistan as Pakistan-administered Kashmir. Adityan (talk) 18:01, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Nangaparbat 

message: India has never made a claim on Antarctica, this would be like claiming one of their embassies in northern europe is the northernmost point in India.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.72.203 (talk) 09:23, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this seems rather spurious to me. I've removed it. Shimgray | talk | 19:06, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antarctica 

message: Dafdar is in the Taghdumbash Pamir near Tashkurgan in China.  Is it really true that India officially claims this area?  Is there a reliable source for the claim? It's not in the List of territorial disputes. --Mhockey (talk) 16:05, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dafdar 

message: South east
223.187.81.190 (talk) 13:49, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of maps
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sri Lanka

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Captain Miller#Requested move 19 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Captain Miller#Requested move 19 January 2024]] 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Dharmaraja–Kingswood Cricket Encounter#undefined that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – robertsky (talk) 15:18, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Dharmaraja–Kingswood Cricket Encounter#undefined]] 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Tamil Genocide#Requested move 2 May 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 10:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Tamil Genocide#Requested move 2 May 2024]]
Talk:Lists of German films

message: This list of films is terribly inadequate.  Before I edited it 5 minutes ago it didn't even include "Lola Rennt" or "Good Bye, Lenin!", two of the most successful, acclaimed and awarded German films in the past decade.  Obviously I haven't seen every German film to date, so if you notice something that's missing, please add it!
[edit]
How the heck did some of these films get in here?  "The Pianist"?  It's a decent film but Roman Polanski is French, for god's sake!
someone has added the film "seven servants" by daryush shokof but it is not properly categorized. would you show me or somene to do this.
i am a huge fan of shokof and believe this is one film the world should be proud of.is it really a German film?! i always thought it was a USA movie?! whatever.
thank you.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.160.209.66 (talk) 11:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  My goodness
Talk:List of Irish films

message: Just wondering why Brian's Irish Films are not included:
* Irish Hearts (1934) I think this is Ireland's first feature length 'talkie'
* Riders to the Sea (1936)
* Ourselves Alone (1936) 
* Hungry Hill (1947)
* Playboy of the Western World (1962)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quartertoten (talk • contribs) 17:20, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brian Desmond Hurst

message: So either the description needs to be changed, or only films made since 1949 should be listed. Or what? Hohenloh  +   12:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Republic didn't come into existence until 1949 

message: I believe the list is missing the film Halal Daddy 
Spailp (talk) 13:49, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing film
Talk:List of Taiwanese films

message: I think this title should be changed to "List of Films From Taiwan". cuz "Taiwanese Film" means "Fovies in Taiwanese (the language)" as well. But this article is about movies that are made in Taiwan. 98.201.161.241 (talk) 22:03, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Thor Power Tool Co. v. Commissioner

message: The article describes Thor's practices before the decision, and an indirect effect of the decision, but appears to say nothing (directly) about the substance of the decision itself. —Tamfang (talk) 18:54, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  substance 

message: This article is incorrect in its reading of Thor Power Tool.  The case disallowed write-down (not depreciation) of goods to salvage value.  The taxpayer tried to get a deduction on the grounds that its accounting method should prevail.  Thor "wrote down what it regarded as excess inventory to Thor's own estimate of the net realizable value of the excess goods. Despite this write-down, Thor continued to hold the goods for sale at original prices. ... Thor's management simply wrote down its closing inventory on the basis of a well educated guess that some of it would never be sold. ... Thor, in other words, sought a current "deduction" for an estimated future loss. Under the decided cases, a taxpayer so circumstanced finds no shelter beneath an accountancy presumption."   The Supreme Court held the IRS was correct in disallowing the deduction.  However, in the opinion the Court implied that a write-down of subnormal or obsolete goods without disposition was permitted, as the IRS had allowed to Thor.  I will rewrite in the near future. Oldtaxguy (talk) 02:19, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is incorrect and based on a pop-fiction magazine article 

message: IIRC, this decision hurt book publishers (and authors) who wanted to keep slow-selling books in print by keeping a few thousand copies in inventory: they'd be taxed as if they had all those books as full-priced assets. That led to the current situation where if a book doesn't immediately sell well it is remaindered for a fraction of its cover price, with its author getting virtually nothing. If we can get a good reference for this development it should be noted as a consequence of the decision. --96.237.197.80 (talk) 14:58, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effect on publishers 

message: "Thor manufactured equipment using multiple parts that it produced."
This statement is very unclear, due to tense issue or otherwise.
Jack Vermicelli 68.36.147.128 (talk) 18:51, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear meaning
Talk:Love Chaser

message: this article does not cite any references sources so how can one mention that it is glam metal unless one has truly heard the song 
music is about 'listening' and not reading about it from any sources which does not make any sense at all
as user FATEFORGER mentioned that we dont need any administrator to remind us that articles must be verifiable - val hallen  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.72.133.176 (talk) 16:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Since you have signed this comment to indicate you are a sock of a currently blocked user, I do not feel the need to repeat again what the issues are here as this has already been made clear to you.--SabreBD (talk) 16:27, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: this song is not glam metal
Category talk:Tamil activists

message: Not sure if all Tamil activists can count as :Category:Minority rights activists. I'm adding that category now, because I found it in Kethesh Loganathan, but I won't object if someone removes it. If you do remove it, please consider putting it back in Kethesh Loganathan and possibly other articles.  — Sebastian 20:57, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Minority rights activists?
Talk:Franz Büchner

message: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:D7f.jpg shows a Fokker D.VII such as Buchner flew. If someone with the skills could dub it in, it would be a great addition to the article.
Georgejdorner (talk) 17:30, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graphic available 

message: I have assessed this article for the Military History project and believe that it is very close to B class. If the following issues could be addressed, I feel it could be promoted from a Start: 
* References: the paragaph about Post war service needs an inline citation;
* Coverage: could a sentence be added about what Buchner did before joining the infantry as a 16 year old? This is a small thing (and probably wouldn't hold up B class in my opinion) but could help to add a bit more biographical detail to the article;
* Grammar: A couple of minor points, nothing major:
**(1)  there are a few single sentence paragraphs. Could these be worked into a larger paragraph? 
**(2) Also there seems some confusion in terminology, some times the term 'win' is used, and at other times the term 'victory' is used in regards to shooting down an enemy aircraft. Could these be fixed for consistency of terminology? 
**(3) There are variations in spelling of the subject's name throughout the article, sometimes Buchner, sometimes Buechner. These need to be fixed.
* Supporting materials: (not a requirement as it already passes), an image of the subject would greatly improve the article if a PD or free image could be obtained. Perhaps the aerodrome.com people could let you use the one they have, if it is not still covered by copyright?
I've done some formating of the citations so that they are more in line with the Manual of Style, too.  Anyway, hope this helps. If you would like a re-assessment after you've made these changes, please don't hesitate to ask. Cheers. Good work so far, by the way. — AustralianRupert (talk) 03:19, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some possible improvements 

message: "With the introduction of the Fokker D.VII in 1918, Büchner came into his own". This sentence appears in para 2 of the 'Service as a fighter pilot' section.
My question is: what type(s) of aircraft did Brüchner fly before 1918?
RASAM (talk) 16:23, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:HMNZS Resolution

message: This ship would need a NZ section to its career infobox, the homeport is also in the wrong box atm. Ingolfson (talk) 11:14, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NZ section 
Talk:Internal Revenue Code section 1031

message: I have merged the old 1031 Exchange article with this one and attempted to clean up the resulting merged article.  It could still use a little more copyediting and cleanup, though. Bry9000 (talk) 22:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please consider the addition of the Ed Okun fraud, where Okun was accused of stealing client escrow funds from Q.I. companies Okun purchased. This came from Bloomberg and the TV series American Greed. Placing money in a Q.I. may not be as safe as one would think.
71.139.164.142 (talk) 18:59, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ed Okun 

message: As much as I hate the "like" buttons on so many websites, I would have used one here.  Instead, I'll just add this section (feel free to delete it) to thank the authors of this article - despite being rated as "Start" class and "Low importance" it provided a very clear and understandable explanation of this type of real estate transaction, which was very helpful to a "casual reader" with some personal interest in the topic.
104.132.34.99 (talk) 14:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks for a very useful article - can't believe it is rated "Start" 

message: This article needs to be updated for changes in the law effective, generally, for exchanges of assets completed after December 31, 2017, under section 13303 of the so-called Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Public Law no. 115-97, signed into law by President Donald Trump on December 22, 2017.
Briefly, for such transactions, the general rule is that only gains or losses on the exchange of real property (i.e., real estate) will receive non-recognition treatment under section 1031. For example, exchanges of livestock will no longer be covered by section 1031, whether of the same sex or not. And, exchanges of real estate "held primarily for sale" will not receive the non-recognition treatment.
We'll have to pull the sources together and work on this later. Famspear (talk) 22:36, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes in the law
Talk:Colegio Arji

message: The names under "notable alumni" do not seem to have accomplished much. Should they really be noted?
12.7.168.29 21:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Alumni 

message: Is this part of Mexico (or any part), really considered "Central America"? The user of the stub "central american schools" should explain this.  Most people in Mexico consider themselves to be in North America. TeamX 05:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geographical Location
Talk:Peptidoglycan

message: There should be some mention on the effect of peptidoglycan on the Gram stain process. A high peptidoglycan content in the cell wall causes Gram-positive bacteria to retain the violet dye.Chibibrain (talk) 05:44, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for the embarrassing error. I did not pay enough attention.--Chibibrain (talk) 06:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Gram Stain Test

message: A diagram of a polymer segment will help visualize the connection between among the monomers and the branches. A schematic drawing of the two dimensional mesh will also augment the verbal discussion effectively.--Chibibrain (talk) 05:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Molecular structure diagrams

message: Article: Peptidoglycan 
The The line in the lead, “The peptide chain can be cross-linked to the peptide chain of another strand forming the 3D mesh-like layer,” is closely paraphrased to the corresponding line in the linked source. Almost the same words and sentence structure is used except for minor differences. The lead also consists of the phrase “a common misconception” to refer to the idea that peptidoglycan maintains cell which shape reflects bias although the cited sources, which are reliable (journal articles), contain evidence supporting this information. 
Information in the first paragraph under the heading: Structure, is unsourced. The diagram showing cross-link formation by penicillin binding protein seems irrelevant because there is no information describing the process. Also, since the structures of both gram-positive and gram negative cell walls are discussed, an additional diagram representing gram-negative cell walls can be added. 
Biosynthesis of peptidoglycan consists of numerous steps. Some of the reactions take place in the cytoplasm, some on the inner side of the cytoplasmic membrane while some on the outer side. Classification of the location of these reactions can be included. Furthermore, the role of different enzymes in each step must be mentioned. 
The role of peptidoglycan in cell division through binary fission can be elaborated. 
Hyperlinks [5] and [9] do not direct to the right page.  
--Rohet31 (talk) 06:41, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ctritique of the article titled Peptidoglycan for MICB301 Microbial Ecophysiology
Talk:Golden Globe Award for Best Motion Picture – Drama

message: The winners that are first, bold, and with the blue background are incorrect, no?  I haven't checked all of them, but all the one's I'm sure of (read: I watched the Oscars that year) are incorrect.  I checked these on their very own website, and the winners are indeed wrong.  I mean, Atonement did not win the Oscar for Best Mostion Picture - Drama last year. 
Unfortunately, I do not have the faculties of patience necessary to go through and correct all the winners.
It is especially concerning in that many of the other Oscar winners, e.g. Best Actor, in other articles are wrong too.  What's going on here?  Anyways, I just wanted to bring this to someone's attention who can fix it.
Flipdog3000 (talk) 05:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The winners are not wrong. This is not Oscar winners, but Golden Globe winners. I think you may have mistaken this for a different list. The Golden Globes are something completely different, and the winners do correspond with the reference given from the official HFPA site . Rambo's Revenge (talk) 16:00, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The winners are, well, wrong. 
Talk:Braising

message: Escoffier notwithstanding, "braising" in the US typically refers to a wet bake, and is synonymous with pot roasting (unlike a "roast", which typically refers to a dry bake). Terminology differences can be documented. In addition, the pot roast article doesn't have enough info to stand on its own. FiveRings (talk) 23:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge pot roast into this article 

message: What is braising 210.1.102.138 (talk) 11:24, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cookery
Talk:Meade Lux Lewis

message: First Rock 'n' Roll Record? According to whom? Steve Pastor 21:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Honky Tonk Train Blues

message: See Robert Palmer reference in boogie woogie article. 1938 through early 1950s is over a decade. Steve Pastor 23:47, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  boogie woogie short lived? 

message: Bob Palmer was wrong, it is called a "craze" because it was short-lived. By the end of WWII it was essentially over in the U.S. I do agree with the first post, Lewis was not a rock 'n' roll pioneer! Christiern Albertson 00:01, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you limit yourself to big bands, etc, you may be right. But... Lawrence Cohn also writes about the hillbilly or country musicians picking up the boogie woogie ideas just about the time the other people were dropping it in his book "Nothing But the Blues". You could check on the Delmore Brothers, as one example. Cohn has an entire chapter on "White Country Blues". There are also references and links to a huge database located at Emory Law University in some of the pages I've worked on. The article on Hound Dog comes to mind as a place to find that link. You'll see and hear plenty of Boogie there. Compilations of music considered to be pre "rock n roll" often include these songs. If you think it's a good idea, I could put some of those links in this article, too. I didn't want to do overkill. Steve Pastor 01:00, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Boogie Woogie craze 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 02:42, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act

message: It is obvious this act expires, as it has expired in the pass, so does anyone know the current status? Otr500 (talk) 20:05, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current status 
Talk:Pseudoroid

message: I've added everything that's on the article right now. Could someone help out and add some info about the ZXA Pseudoroids (by that I mean more than what's on the ZXA article). I would but I don't own ZXA yet... ChromeWulf ZX 17:48, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ZXA Pseudoroids?
Talk:Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982

message: Conservatives have been repeating the claim alternatively that "Congress" promised Reagan 3-1 spending cuts, or that "the Democrats" promised Reagan 3-1 spending cuts in exchange for the 1982 Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act. I've seen no persuasive citation for either proposition. The obvious importance in this context relates to the current debt ceiling debate. To sustain this statement on this page, more information is needed. 
1) Who promised the cuts? 
2) What was the specific wording of the agreement? 
3) Who are the percipient witnesses to this agreement? 
4) Is there any contemporaneous documentation of this agreement?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.251.145.68 (talk) 22:00, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:First Australian Army

message: This article would benefit from a breakdown in the divisional allocation to the corps. For example, a list of divisions is provided, but then the 5th Div is mentioned, which is not listed. I appreciate that the formation will have fluxed over time, but some sort of timeline would be useful if it is available. Cheers, Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 07:36, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, PM, thanks - I have added mention of the 5th Inf Div in the first allocation. I have now also added an orbat with a couple of snapshots, which probably doesn't quite fit the bill, but hopefully might clear up some uncertainty? Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:55, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breakdown
Talk:Use-centered design

message: The first sentence is a strawman:"The use-centered design is a design philosophy in which the focus is on the goals and tasks associated with the use of certain technology, as opposed to "user-centered design" approach, where the focus is on the user alone."
User-centered design is a design philosophy that was proposed to contrast what is characterized as "technology-centered design".  The overly literal interpretation of user-centered design as being focused solely on the users, but somehow ignoring the users' goals and tasks is nonsensical. --Ronz 21:21, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Strawman