Talk:Austro-Hungarian Compromise of 1867

message: Not a stub anymore, the article didn't present details of the accord. The equal status was impossible, the Emperor of Austria being greater of the King of Hungary. --Vasile 02:35, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You did a good job. 165.234.101.97 (talk) 18:49, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: The equal status

message: shouldnt it be austrian history, also?--Tresckow 10:33, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  austrian history 

message: This article is one-sided (anti-Hungarian), lacks of many important details , so I think it would be better to rewrite it from the beginning. Barlac 18:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: "General Encyclopedia Usage" is a vague criterion: we should be influenced by what standard scholarly descriptions are.  And the standard scholarly description in English is Ausgleich. Slac speak up! 09:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Ausgleich (Austro-Hungarian)" is good, but "Compromise of 1867" is bewildering, because without a context, the collision risk seems overwhelming when we have an encyclopedia treating almost everything conceivable, including a "Compromise of 1867" between the (imaginary) author Fritz Schultz and his (imaginary) wife Emma. Said: Rursus (☻) 10:51, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This should be moved back

message: Serbs were also disappointed because of abolishing Military Frontier. -- Bojan  07:04, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That is true (and a commonly refered to reason for the start of WWI). Please find a source and add a paragraph in the text. Said: Rursus (☻) 10:56, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serbs 

message: Does the Compromise have a date in the year 1867? Said: Rursus (☻)
:Yeah, 29 of May, 1867: see f.ex. Ausgleich Chronology. Needed for my deanachronizer database, used for translating German Astronomer to Bayuvarian Astronomer. Said: Rursus (☻) 11:12, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date?

message: This article succinctly illustrates how the Austro-Hungarian Compromise ties into broader ideas of European nationalism and changing power relations in the nineteenth century. It may be improved upon by more background on the constitutional reforms that had failed prior to the Compromise, but its further reading section provides the detail that the article uses to make a convincing argument for the complicated nature of Austro-Hungarian politics and how the future of the two nations was ultimately bound together. It certainly does not provide a Hungarian bias on the issues presented therein.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krimpul (talk • contribs) 18:09, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  In 19th Century Europe's Context 

message: Though it may not have been the original intention in 1867, in subsequent year this increasingly came to be viewed as a Germano-Hungarian pact to repress Slavic nationalisms and self-determination of Slavs (an important part of why the Treaty of Trianon borders were set where they were)... AnonMoos (talk) 19:17, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Slavic nationalism

message: Your text does not fit in the The status of Kingdom of Hungary before the revolution section:  "Since 1867, the Austrian and Hungarian customs union agreement had to be renegotiated" 
Also, why did you reinsert the text "The Compromise of 1867 was meant to be a temporary solution" that is unsourced for a long time? 79.117.186.90 (talk) 22:22, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Message for [[User:Norden1990 ]] 

message: This edit, although not plagiarism because the source is credited and the quotes are clearly marked, is still a copyright infringement. The amount of copyright text quoted (including the translation) far exceeds what is acceptable per Wikipedia:Non-free content policy. The quoted segments need to be shortened to at most one or two sentences, and the rest of the content should be appropriately summarised. See also this section of Wikipedia:Quotations. – Voceditenore (talk) 16:07, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the excessive quotes in their entirety from the Adoption section, but have left the references. The material is available in this version for editors who wish to re-add a summary of the quoted material in your own words per the guidelines above. Note also that a translation of a copyright work, is still a copyright infringement if excessively quoted. Voceditenore (talk) 05:31, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

text: Maghasito, I have once again removed your excessive quotation of copyright material. Please read the guidance links above and do not keep restoring it. You must summarize the material in your own words. Voceditenore (talk) 06:45, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive quotation/copyright infringement 

message: I restored the original referenced version, which contained relevant informations about the status of Hungary before 1848. I don't know why is the historical reality so painful for some editors.
We must involve some sentences that the Austrian intervention against the royalist Batthiány government, which was a 100% illegal act, which was condemned by the public opinion of conemporary free and democtratic word (USA UK France) --Prudoncty (talk) 10:58, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: USER:Prudoncty BLOCKED for sockpuppetry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.12.90 (talk) 21:49, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: restored original referenced version, which contained relevant informations about the status of Hungary before 1848.

message: Without any explanation  
http://epa.oszk.hu/00600/00691/00036/15.html
The text clearly pointed out, that there were only two countries before the 19th century, where the passport was a necessity: Russia and the Ottoman Empire. The Austrians and Hungarians had separated passports when they traveled to Turkey and Russia.--Enginerfactories (talk) 12:31, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't delete the text, I moved it to another place. The article is about the compromise and the union that was the result of it. The passport reference was written in a section about the history BEFORE the compromise. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 12:54, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: User: Hebel deleted the reference sentence about the passport