lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Aslaug

message: The article lists Ubba as a son of Aslaug, which is wrong, and doesn't list Bjorn, who was actually her son. The list of Aslaug's children written in this article looks like it comes from the tv series "Vikings", which diverges a lot from the historical sources and it's not meant as an accurate reconstruction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.151.194.69 (talk) 11:52, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no "actually" of any kind in sagas. This is all fiction, as far as we know in history. SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:55, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Sons etc

message: Could someone who is good at it please add a pronunciation thingy after her name?! Applying English phonetics (especially southern US) is obviously not a good idea. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:57, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation
Talk:Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration

message: Do think, the redict from "Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin" to "Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration" is right? I think it's not the same, isn't it?  137.248.254.132  08:51, 6 June 2006
I agree that MCH should not be redirected to MCHC, as the two are distinct -although related- concepts. It might also be helpful to mention in each article that "MCH is not to be confused with MCHC" and vice versa. --Jay Litman 17:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Do

message: it says that This makes the machine think there are a low number of very dense red blood cells. - I don't think machines can 'think'! it would be more apporpriate to write This makes machines to mis-analyse that there are a.... instead
202.37.167.175 04:24, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  thinking analysers? 

message: I came here, probably like 99% of people who come here, after getting a blood test result where the MCHC level was outside the norm. Instead of seeing an article explaining what I need to know, I get medical lingo aimed at the graduate level. I've seen this time and time again on the Wikipedia with medical articles. Please think of the readers, people! --93.41.170.202 (talk) 08:33, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are Wikipedia medical articles so layman unfriendly? 
Talk:Belarusian alphabet

message: This article ought to more comprehensibly represent Belarusian alphabet. Welcome! —Yury Tarasievich 12:55, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I think that letter names and pronunciations are should add on this page. See the Hungarian version article of "Belarusian alphabet"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.35.120.42 (talk) 09:09, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Letter names and pronunciation

message: Wowie 92.47.56.204 (talk) 11:14, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is good
Talk:Mean corpuscular hemoglobin

message: I believe that you may want to consider editing the definition of the MCH.  It is the MCV that indicates whether the red cell is microcytic, normocytic or macrocytic.  The MCH indicates if the red cell is hypochromic(low MCH), normochromic (normal MCH) or hyperchromic(high MCH).  The MCH is used in combination with the MCV and the MCHC to classify anemias based on the red cells' hemoglobin concentration and cell size.  For example iron deficiency anemia is considered a hypochromic, microcytic anemia. -- JMCHUGH  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.230.130.57 (talk) 21:49, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: I think the redirection from "Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin" to "Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration" is wrong. It's not the same.
kind regards
--137.248.254.132 12:58, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I

message: Not an expert on this by any means but there are several references to "weight". Should this not be "mass"? Omar77 (talk) 12:29, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Weight
Talk:Tab Mix Plus

message: This whole page seems like a giant ad for tab mix plus. I'll get around to doing something about it hopefully.
---
I think I may have improved that situation somewhat.  The feature list is more objective and less ad-like.  Also, I've done a bit of re-formatting.  I'll remove the Wikify template, since the article is now formatted similarly to other articles on extensions. Peter T.S. 23:38, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well add or not, this is required, I can't understand what they hacks who made firefox doesn't include most of this in the client - its basic functionality which is sorely needed. Just trying the new FF3 i realized how pathetic it really is out of the box. --IceHunter (talk) 18:04, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe we're supposed to discuss editing the page here, not our opinions about the software. That said, the reason it wasn't included is because Firefox was designed to be fast & bloat-free by letting users add the features they wanted; no hacks or patheticness involved. --Xyzzy Avatar 00:10, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meh 

message: I'm not sure about that section. Surely the fact that people uninstalled 2.0 for it is a testament to how good it is. It's not their fault it didn't work on 2.0. --89.243.247.0 21:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critisism 

message: The first paragraph seems more like an ad to me.  No offense, but from what I see in this, I don't see any reason why I would want to install it.  Then again, I'm using another FF extension that has the same functionality :)  As per Mozilla's add-on directory, it is currently registered as the third-top downloda in the Tabs category Boonebytes (talk) 11:37, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First paragraph - Ad?
Talk:List of people associated with the University of London

message: Why are "Physics" and "Physicists" seperate sections? Same for the other sciences... could be deemed confusing at best MilleauRekiir 13:10, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good suggestion, I've gone ahead and done just that. --Daduzi talk 14:24, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have included London Business School in the college list as LBS and also included some alumni names from London Business School. Please have a look there and if anyone have anything to say, please raise your point. Niaz bd 7:45, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

text: OK, I've added the people listed on St George's, University of London, if there's any more you want added let me know or feel free to add them youself (you can see the edit I made here so you can see what you'd need to do to add similar information). --Daduzi talk 01:27, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

message: If you go as per the Wikipedia article List of University of London people, see the table below:
University College London                     	29
London School of Economics                    	18
Imperial College London                       	14
King's College London                         	12
University of London International Programmes 	7
Queen Mary University of London               	7
Birkbeck, University of London                	4
Lister Institute for Preventive Medicine      	3
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine	2
Central School of Speech and Drama            	1
School of Oriental and African Studies        	1
* There is a calculation problem. If you simply add the above number i.e. the total laureates from each college from UOL, the number comes around to 98. However, taking into account that ICL (Imperial College London) has left the UOL, then it would be 98 (-) 14 = 84. 
* How is anyone getting to 74?
* How is that the Wikipedia articles List of University of London people and University of London say there are only 74 laureates, whereas the calculation now shows that there are 84.
Please rectify the errors. How are the people here editing Wikipedia, dont know simple addition and mathematics.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Japanmomo (talk • contribs) 01:15, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Nobel Laureates Calculation problem? | Total Numbers?
Talk:Memphis Union Station

message: Is the location of this former station, now USPS sorting facility, the block bounded by S. 2nd Ave on the West, G.E. Patterson Ave. on the North, S. B. B. King Blvd on the East, and E. Carolina Ave on the South, or is the description in the article "located on Calhoun Street, between south Second Street and Rayburn Boulevard (now south Third Street)" more accurate?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:3CB:100:438:F51D:9264:15DB:4A3C (talk) 22:31, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Contact Group (Balkans)

message: The article was written based on this US government site. I tried to adapt it as much as possible, so that I do not copy-vio anything. Should you notice any parts which seem similar to the site mentioned above, please help in paraphrasing. I apologize in advance, if that is the case. ilir_pz 13:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: Should this page be renamed something like Contact Group (Balkans)?      ... Art LaPella 21:12, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it should. Let's rename it.--Rallette 14:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contact Group (Balkans) 

message: Is Russia still in the contact group? Guess not anymore.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.170.51.2 (talk) 23:09, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russia? 
Talk:Racism by country

message: You idiots on wikipedia need to stop arguing over the israel page and start focusing on the smaller countries around the world. Get the administrators and others in here so that you can actually do something you could've done FIVE YEARS AGO in adding info about countries nobody seems to know or care about. If you spent as much time editing countries like loas or nigeria as you did fooling with the US and Israel instead of locking them and moving on, you could've been the first on this site to complete the racism by country page. Sincerely, an American. I do apoligize for any sense I make among wikipedians.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.171.6.150 (talk) 00:41, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  READ THIS 

message: There's nothing here. Should we pare down this version or this version in order to present relevant links and information? Honestly. groupuscule (talk) 06:18, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Someone distroyed the whole article. 78.8.181.112 (talk) 20:49, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:   Since your last revision of this article, almost all of the article's content has been removed. Should this content be restored? Jarble (talk) 22:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Um... 

message: I have removed the link to the Washington Post article "World’s most and least racially tolerant countries". The article headline is misleading, as the article makes clear that the data from the World Values Survey is raw. The Survey was not designed to estimate racial tolerance, and the article shows that there are many reasons to not take the data seriously. There is something highly questionable about the result for India, given it is 40% even though the country having no history of racial tension, as usually understood, and all surrounding countries under 10% for no obvious reason. For the record, I have no connection with India. See also Saidmen's blog  Travelmite (talk) 18:02, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  No such thing as a map of least tolerant countries
Talk:Ang mo

message: After reading this definition on Ang Mo, I would like to say it is all wrong. Ang Mo is a proper term addressed in Hokkien historically and will remain same.
In chinese it is call 洋人(yang ren) meaning western foreigners. The kou and kui (devil) are additional negative words added by displeased people in the later years but it is a street invented words and never to be tied with the original words.
Thus Ang Mo is a perfectly normal word to address white westerners in dialect and so is yang ren.
Spheredomesg (talk) 08:21, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled message]

message: I have worked from people who I believe were from this part of China in a number of cities, and they always use the term 'Hwong ya', but I cannot find any discussion of this term on any of the linked articles.  The only explanation I was ever given is that it was the word in their dialect for 'Waiguoren'.  Is it very rude?  70.105.36.100 13:21, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hwong ya?

message: Ever since my first visit to the family of my wife-to-be in Malaysia, some of her family members have referred to me as "ang mo" or "ang mo lang".  I didn't know what it meant, but they were friendly, so I figured it was something of a local epithet for "foreigner".  Another family member I met later asked me if I was offended and I said that I had no reason to feel that way.  They explained to me that it meant "red-haired monkey".  It still didn't bother me, since I knew they were nice people and they were just having a bit of fun at my expense.
After I read this article about "ang mo" and this discussion, I wonder if I should caution these family members not to call me that, since I don't want them to appear racist to others.  At the same time, if some stranger in Malaysia calls me that, should I react cautiously?  Is it really as bad as calling a black person "nigger"?
--Lance E Sloan (talk) 16:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should I Be Offended? 

message: shouldnt taiwan and malaysia be flipped?
ang mo is also used in malaysia in addition to singapore but taiwan has their own words for referring to white people Lilraveoli (talk) 17:07, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  taiwan and Malaysia
Talk:Coat of arms of Chile

message: A condor is not a bird of prey or predator.  Like other vultures, they are scavengers, feeing on carrion. Scott S 13:23, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Bird of Prey"

message: The free translation of "Por la razón o la fuerza" loses the spirit of the phrase, a better translation of "razón" would be "reason", and a much better overall translation would be "By means of reason or force" or "By reason or force". "Might" implies some kind of status over the opponent, while the term "fuerza" must be interpreted as strenght or force of will, instead of a superior power.
So, though "By right or might" rhymes and sounds cool, a much better translation is "By reason or force".
I think it's better "By right or might", i mean, if you don't like it, we kick your ass  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.21.0.51 (talk) 20:34, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation

message: , will you please stop reverting and replacing :File:Coat of arms of Chile.svg with you own creation :File:Coat of arms of Chile (c).svg, and first try and gain a consensus to change the image? If you keep doing this, I will be forced to ask for an administrator's intervention. Fry1989 eh? 01:02, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The file is according the original image of the national coat of arms, as it can be seen in the original decree (decreto 2271 de 1920) and in this colored image (the same) from Military Geographic Institute, and with the coat of arms description, in the article. --Echando una mano (talk) 02:03, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I am asking you to stop replacing :File:Coat of arms of Chile.svg (which is the file that has always been on this article) with your own personal creation until you have gained a consensus for the change. Are you or are you not willing to do that? Fry1989 eh? 02:14, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Both are my personal creations (with the basis of B1mbo's work). I will wait for the consensus, but you and me will be out of the discussion.--Echando una mano (talk) 02:58, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for reverting your change. Fry1989 eh? 03:12, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which file should be used on this article
Talk:Son of man/Archive 1

message: * I'll be adding in examples of how the Aramaic בר אנשא (bar nashâ) is used as a title of piousness and self-reference near the turn of the millenium from surviving written evidence within the next week. -The Thadman 18:08, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: While not disputing the removal, per se, it appeared to me the paragraph reported a cited source's opinion which is relevant to the article topic. Should this paragraph have been rewritten to present this information in NPOV? - Amgine 19:18, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: <Nod> I thought that was the case. Just wanted to be sure. As to the sockpuppet question, in this case I don't think so. Mirv has reported repeated anon attempts on this particular subject related to the citation for a week or so now. I think the text you have then covers the issue. Is the article referenced? - Amgine 19:47, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV paragraph removal
Talk:Drew Fraser

message: Is Drew Fraser really the appropriate name for this article? Most sources seem to name him as "Andrew Fraser", including his own works! The former name, "Andrew Fraser (academic)" is inappropriate since he is no longer an academic.mgekelly 22:09, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of page

message: 1. Previous reference to Deakin U law journal not publishing article "under threat of a law suit" changed, as not supported by the source (newspaper article) cited. The article merely said that the University had received advice that publishing the article may breach anti-racial vilification and other laws. Different to a specific threat.
2. Previous reference (in External links) to article being "banned" by Deakin U replaced with a more accurate phrase. The difference between a single law journal choosing not to publish an article (even for overtly legal/political reasons) and 'banning' is obvious.211.30.154.175 12:24, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit 13/3/07 re Deakin U article

message: Added a short note on Fraser's appearance at the Sydney Forum in 2009, which I attended as a journalist.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.130.37.12 (talk) 05:36, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit 21/5/10 re Sydney Forum appearance
Talk:Mort Leav

message: David Leav, Mort's son, was kind enough to take the time and effort point out the erroneous year of his father's passing. I acknowledged my unfortunately significant typo at Wikipedia:Help_desk#Mort_Leav and wanted to do so here. 
I'd say my error was mortifying, but it wasn't Mort's fault! :- )
And 2006 is absolutely right; my source, Alter Ego #58 (May 2006), p. 68, does indeed say 2006, and I did a typo on the last digit that made it a "5". I'm happy and gratified that the highly talented Mr. Leav's son has come to Wikipedia to see his father's bio here.
Moments like that (my typo aside!) help make this all worthwile. Bob Powell's son contacted my Talk page a couple months back to say, "I enjoy the fact you have taken the time do a page like this!" -- Tenebrae 13:25, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: My typo
Talk:Cruel Melody

message: Why do those lyrics need to be there? It just says they are there randomly.
Are they important? Are they a quote? Are they stolen?
I'm going to remove them, if someone can come up with a reason as to why they need to be there, other than "They spoke to me," put them back. 12.175.230.56 02:09, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Iodine Sky
Talk:Alfentanil

message: Ooops, had to enter it all again.  Tried to use JChem to create the molecule from SMILES, but it won't let me rotate it to the right orientation....help anyone? --Copperman 13:31, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: FWIW, the spelling "alfentanyl" gets many more hits on Google. --leuce (talk) 09:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Talk:Eastern Catholic Churches/Archive 1

message: The result of the debate was move, but as to where, I didn't see a single preferred option. Consequently, I've decided to move it to Eastern Rite Catholic Churches, which seems best to me, but this should not be seen as a final decision. —Nightstallion (?) 10:36, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

message: * You cannot do this. Not unless you make "Eastern Rite" a disambiguation page. Dpotop 06:31, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Keep as '''Eastern Rite'''

message: * Support. This is how the Roman Catholic Church defines them. A small disambig must point to the definition of Catholic, however. Dpotop 06:31, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ditto. I did not see the difference Church/Churches. Dpotop 09:18, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to '''Eastern Catholic Church'''

message: * Support. This is how the Roman Catholic Church actually refers to them. The plural is necessary in this case, to avoid misunderstanding. Lima 08:59, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to '''Eastern Catholic Churches'''

message: * Oppose. This expression is found only in the www.vatican.va heading of its English translation of the Orientalium Ecclesiarum decree. The other translations on the same site all have "Eastern Catholic Churches" (in plural, of course): katolických východních církvích; Églises orientales catholiques; Chiese orientali cattoliche; Igrejas Orientais Católicas; Iglesias Orientales Católicas; Makanisa katoliki ya Mashariki. More important, the original text, as published in the official gazette of the Holy See, has "Decretum de Ecclesiis orientalibus catholicis". Lima 08:59, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to '''Catholic Churches of the Eastern Rite'''

message: * Oppose: a) unnecessarily complex; b) should be plural; c) some of these Churches, in particular the Romanian, frequently use "Roman Catholic" to mean "Latin Catholic". Lima 08:59, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to '''Eastern Roman Catholic Church'''
Talk:Gay agenda/Archive 5

message: This probably isn't directly relevant to the article, but for what it's worth:
:David Cicilline remembers being at the headquarters for his Providence, R.I., mayoral campaign this fall when a prospective volunteer and voter walked in. "I was thinking of supporting your campaign," the man--a senior citizen and devout Catholic--told Cicilline. "But first, I want to know what your gay agenda is."
:"That's easy," Cicilline responded. "My gay agenda is for government reform, improving neighborhoods, and strengthening schools."
--SarekOfVulcan
:A fine example of a skillful politician fielding a stupid question.  His point is clearly that he doesn't have a uniquely gay agenda. Rather, his agenda is to make Providence a better city for all. Al 17:28, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's pretty funny. At least he has a sense of humor. DavidBailey 22:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why assume he was joking? CovenantD 22:17, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He wasn't joking - just being ironic. David L Rattigan 22:28, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't have to be joking to have a sense of humor. DavidBailey 23:56, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I actually know the person on the other side of the question, and was quite amused to come across this and recognize the flip side of the story I had been told. :-)--SarekOfVulcan 21:47, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd be interested in knowing more, if you'd like to leave it on my talk page that would be great, so we don't take up more space here. CovenantD 22:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Providence Mayor's "gay agenda" 

message: Bhuck, rather than continuing to add the disputed tag, could you explain the parts of the article you think are disputable? I feel this tag is often used when someone disagrees with something in the article, which is probably not the best use of it. That's why the discussion page exists. Thanks. DavidBailey 17:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed Tag
Talk:HMS Gorgon (1914)

message: According to this article "Gordon" was the name given to the Norwegian coastal defense ship "Nidaros", after they seized it in construction at the outbreak of WWI. Easily mixed with "Gorgon", I guess. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.1.144.84 (talk) 13:41, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  HMS Gordon?