lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Crippled Inside

message: On the Beatles-expert/scholars podcast "Something About the Beatles" it has been pointed out the structural and melodic similarities between "Crippled Inside" and Blind Blakes 1927 recording "Black Dog Blues." It was possibly unconscious and unintentional, and I don't hear the similarities myself, but it probably deserves a place in the article if a source can be cited. Question is: Is a podcast considered a reliable source? Generally they aren't, but what of one hosted and conducted by acknowledged subject experts and authors? ShelbyMarion (talk) 15:06, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black Dog Blues?
Talk:Jat Tehnika

message: The article needs updating generally. Several mentions of "in 2007...will" and "in 2008...will". Did these events happen? If so, the sentences should be rewritten to state this. Mjroots (talk) 05:14, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Updating required
Talk:Northwest Division (NBA)

message: If you're going to do that then all the other instances of teams tying with other teams for first in a division need to be changed to show the other team as well.  As far as I can tell, this has not been done.  Also, the Portland Trailblazers have not announced any form of t-shirt memorabilia to recognize this event.  Normally teams do so when they win a division title.  In fact, I think you'd be hard pressed to find any time where a team won the division, and they failed to recognize this achievement.
Yes, the Portland Trailblazers have declared to members of the media that they are co-division champions, but until the NBA sanctions such statements by allowing the Portland Trailblazers to produce t-shirts proclaiming them as division champions AND other teams are rewarded as division champions, even though they finished second, it should be the Denver Nuggets and only the Denver Nuggets that are 2009 Northwest division champions.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nugzin2040 (talk • contribs) 03:46, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Giving Portland the co-champion title
Talk:Eastern Conference (NBA)

message: Why there is an asterisk by the New York Knicks? Shakurazz (talk) 09:22, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New York Knicks 

message: When Warriors won their championships, they were known as Philadelphia Warriors. So I think it is just unnecessary to add 'Golden State' because people will find out anyway about the name and location change when they point the mouse over it. The same goes to Washington/Baltimore Bullets. Only 76ers – Nationals have both won their separate championships, so we leave the both teams visible. If you think differently, please give a reason :). Shakurazz (talk) 07:35, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philadelphia – Golden State Warriors
Talk:Grand Sanhedrin

message: Questions 1 to 6 correspond to answers 1 to 6, and questions 11 and 12 are answered by answer 9. However, questions 7 to 10 are not answered, and answers 7 to 8 don't have any corresponding questions. What's going on? --Keeves 17:51, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions and Answers 

message: does any one have any sources with the names of men who sat on this sanhedrin if they could be added as identified it would be a valuable addition  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.219.225.3 (talk) 18:21, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: A list appears here but I don't have the expertise to know if it's a legitimate source. --AntediluvianBlue (talk) 13:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names of members 

message: Great to know that anybody can make up quotes about anybody and wiki will leave those quotes up, for everyone to see, for a full decade, without requiring any sort of citation or evidence at all. Surely this is not a double standard right? 206.174.198.66 (talk) 13:33, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You'll notice that the page says "This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Jewish Encyclopedia". That's because this article incorporates text from the Jewish Encyclopedia. You can see the original article and its sources here. GordonGlottal (talk) 14:25, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  11 years no citation? No problem apparently for the wiki editors here.
Talk:Hawaiian hoary bat

message: Dd you know cats lay eggs in a chicken coop   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.200.82.44 (talk) 17:05, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it normal wikipedia terms to use the IUCN classification in such ways for subspecies? The Hawaiian hoary bat is here listed an EN (IUCN 3.1) because the subspecies is considered and listed in the US as EN. However, the IUCN does not consider subspecies and lists the species (hoary bat) as LC. As a consequence, shouldn't this subspecies be listed at LC (IUCN 3.1). Else, it is misleading for the reader, isn't it? (March 3, 2014)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.254.214.6 (talk) 03:46, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have addressed this concern by changing the conservation status system from IUCN to ESA (US Endangered Species Act). I think listing the Hawaiian hoary bat as least concern would not be appropriate, given its conservation importance in the US due to the ESA.Enwebb (talk) 00:15, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Species IUCN Classification

message: I'm going to change this page from Lasiurus semotus to Lasiurus cinereus semotus. The Baird et al. (2015) paper referenced for elevating the Hawaiian hoary bat did not appear to gain traction. This taxa is most recently referred to as a subspecies of the hoary bat, and it is not currently recognized as a species by the US Fish and Wildlife Service or the IUCN. Enwebb (talk) 00:23, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomic revision
Category talk:Magical girl anime and manga

message: How do I add new Anime that have henshins?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blueknightex (talk • contribs) 09:38, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Anime into Category 

message: This isn't a Magical Girl Anime or Manga as much as a listing of characters in one, and shouldn't be listed here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.246.155.186 (talk) 00:51, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing "List of My-HiMe Child and Elements" 

message: Either this category be renamed as a gender neutral Magical [child/girl or boy/etc] anime and manga, or split so as to treat Magical Boys as sub-category of Magical Girls anime/manga genre. Several "magical boy" characters and "magical boy" series. (examples include:  D.N.Angel, Mei no Naisho, and Negima!). Plus, as anime and culture advances in the near future, there is no guarantee that every magical girl protagonist will actually be a "girl"; some might be non-human or of a LGBT-neutrality, and some magical boys-variants may grow in popularity. One only needs to look at Harry Potter and Korra.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.119.198.186 (talk) 07:00, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge/Split: Magical Boys 

message: If we have an entire series' category listed as a subcategory here, then I propose we simply remove any of that category's articles from this category, since it's overclassification and distracts from works which lack categories. For example I see 4 "sailor moon" things here, which don't need to be, since we have the category and it already gets prime focus.
Furthermore, when there's a lot of duplication but no category (project A-ko for example) we should probably just create a category for it. Ranze (talk) 04:53, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Subcategory elements

message: why is princess knight in this category?Masterball2 (talk) 04:47, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: why
Category talk:Martial arts anime and manga

message: History's Strongest Disciple Kenichi is not on this page Akana01 (talk) 14:13, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is, using its Japanese name Shijō Saikyō no Deshi Kenichi. --Mysdaao talk 14:16, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History's Strongest Disciple Kenichi 

message: Not every series in this category treats the martial arts as a combat sport. Many like Fist of the North Star, Legend of the Condor Hero and Jubei-chan: The Ninja Girl, have more in common with the martial arts film genres: kung fu, wuxia and chanbara. That's why I removed :Category:Sports anime and manga.--Nohansen (talk) 05:10, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Sports anime and manga]]
Talk:International Field Archery Association

message: IFAA may be also International Federation of Associations of Anatomists--Giselle Chamorro (talk) 21:33, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  IFAA
Talk:The Tempest (1979 film)

message: Eponymous means that the title is the name of a character, so 'Hamlet is the protagonist of the eponymous play, 'Hamlet'. What you meant is 'homonympus'; there are no characters called Tempest in 'The Tempest'.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.45.136 (talk) 23:23, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Misuse of the word 'eponymous'
Talk:Phone-paid Services Authority

message: Organisation logo image in article still says PhonepayPlus. -- 79.74.158.196 (talk) 15:52, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phone-paid Services Authority vs. PhonepayPlus logo
Talk:Icos

message: ? Rod57 (talk) 13:02, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (companies). Shubinator (talk) 15:25, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldnt the article be renamed/moved to Icos corporation 
Talk:Undisputed championship (professional wrestling)

message: The WWE may have had an undisputed championship for for the WWE. But it was not the only World title at the time. This article needs to state that it is following the PWI rule, which is not the source for who is a World title, but only a magazine. The NWA World Title was very much in existence during the time of Jericho's reign, so the WWE title was NOT a undisputed World title. And to be honest, there is no such thing anymore or will there ever be. --DanteAgusta (talk) 06:05, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWE title 

message: I'd argue that this article needs to include some reference to either America only or mention the various world titles in Japan and Mexico. Fol de rol troll (talk) 15:16, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Wrestling Only? 

message: The term is used in at least one other sport - chess.--Dixtosa (talk) 21:00, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too specific?
Talk:Typographic alignment

message: I just edited the article to remove the alignment of the text for each section.  It doesn't seem encyclopedic to change the formatting just to demonstrate the different types of alignment.  --Bando26 (talk) 05:47, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of alignment in the article 

message: I suggest this article should be merged with Justification (typesetting).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.96.236.8 (talk) 08:20, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: The example of "flesh left" has a pretty uneven left margin, due to crazy capitals and lots of indenting.  A screenshot of flush left, flush right, centered, and justified in a modern word processor would be better. -- Beland (talk) 21:57, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better examples needed 

message: The article mentions that left-aligned is used widely on the web (and indeed it is default for wikipedia as well). But then in the problems with justification section, only software for making printed documents are mentioned. 
From some sources it seems there's a difference between user preference in printed and electronically displayed material. Eg. https://cuttingedgepr.com/should-you-use-left-aligned-right-aligned-or-justified-typesetting-in-printed-publications/ mentions a study about printed docs, users having huge preference for justified. This one https://designforhackers.com/blog/justify-text-html-css/ mentions that web browsers (as opposed to the typesetting software mentioned in this wiki article) are not capable of all of the special justification methods and thus create crude result. A language expert friend also told me that they found difference btw print and online. These things should be mentioned here (but I'd prefer someone with more knowledge in typesetting writing it, I may use not the best terminology and maybe someone knows of more research that could be cited or more knowledge about how browsers display etc).  Hoemaco (talk) 06:54, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  problems with justification
Talk:Register-transfer level

message: If RTL-level design was ever used for RTL-logic design, and we could find a source to that effect, there might be a reason to imagine a relationship.  But TTL and ECL and CMOS are more likely targets for it, and they're not linked, to let's not link the Resistor–transistor logic that's related only by initialism.  Same from the other side(s). Dicklyon (talk) 02:29, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to [[Resistor–transistor logic]]?

message: *Is it correct to say that HDLs allow to express a digital circuit at the abstraction of RTL? 
*RTL is used in the logic design phase of the integrated circuit design cycle.
**Logic design redirects to Boolean algebra (logic) which is a mathematical term, not a engineering term. So what is meant with logic design phase?
***changed this --64.2.143.12 (talk) 20:49, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship between HDL and RTL 

message: The article says "...changes its state on each clock edge.". Shouldn't this be "...each rising clock edge." or "...each positive clock edge"?
Ellingd (talk) 16:53, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clock edge 

message: D latch operation: at the edge of a clock, input will be made available at the output. The example, however implies that the input function is synchronised.
Wrong
process(clk)
begin
    if rising_edge(clk) then
        D <= not Q;
    end if;
end process;
Right
D <= not Q;
process(clk)
begin
    if rising_edge(clk) then
        Q <= D;
    end if;
end process;
--Armandas j (talk) 15:11, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  VHDL example 

message: "Power estimation" would make a good addition to this existing RTL page, would improve the sources for this topic, and neither page is big enough that a spinoff is necessary. —  (e • t • c) 14:24, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and  Klbrain (talk) 21:25, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the first time I've ready this page, and I have to say that the whole section on RTL power estimation seems strangely out of place on this page. 209.145.84.194 (talk) 12:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[State of art power estimation techniques for RTL]]
Talk:Chorley cake

message: The Eccles cake page describes the difference between a Chorley Cake and an Eccles Cake as:
A similar sort of cake originates from the town of Chorley in Lancashire. The Chorley cake is flatter in appearance, is made with shortcrust pastry rather than puff pastry and is devoid of sugar topping.
Is this consistent?193.60.133.201 11:13, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is nothing in there which contradicts this page, and it is similarly true. The lack of sugar crust on the top is another reason why a Chorley cake is much less sweet than an Eccles one. The Eccles cake should be flat (as made traditionally) and made with flakey pastry. Puff pastry is a modern addition and generally results in the top of the cake doming upward during baking, giving it a more raised top than the Chorley. Pyrope 11:38, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Query

message: It would be great to include a photo of a chorley cake in the article, even if only by exernal link.  Neither of the current 3 recipe links has one.   I've never eaten a chorley cake, so I don't think I'm the right person to select a representative photo. NinetyNineFennelSeeds (talk) 17:33, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: The Sad cake section here describes the traditional sad cake, from which the Chorley cake is derived. I propose to split this section to its own page; sad cake has its own notability and pre-dates the Chorley cake, which is just a commercial variety of it. Having Sad cake as a section of Chorley cake is  very much  putting the cart before the horse. Swanny18 (talk) 23:19, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: So the earliest reference is in The Rural Life of England by William Howitt (1841) (first edition was in fact 1838)? The article currently doesn't say much about the earliest reference to Chorley cakes? Martinevans123 (talk) 23:24, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for replying (sorry for the lateness of my response); I don’t have an earliest date for sad cake; I had assumed it was traditional in the North West (and it seems in Yorkshire also): Do you think the articles shouldn’t be split? It seems the notion of sad cake  goes beyond Chorley... Swanny18 (talk) 23:40, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split?
Talk:Cumberland sausage

message: Don't they deserve a mention?  Traveller palm (talk) 15:56, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about cumberland chipolatas? 

message: Cumberlands are shown cooking at a British barbecue in the show Midsomer Murders titled "Midsomer Life" Season 11, Episode 4 at 1:32 (toward the end of the show after the murder is solved).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.51.126.185 (talk) 17:22, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about a section for In Fiction? 

message: "Spices" surely cannot account for 15% of the mass of a sausage.  What are the other non-meat ingredients commonly used?  (Presumably, since the article claims that up to 55% non-meat was used in the past, this must include some sort of cheaper filler.)  121a0012 (talk) 04:50, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Almost every variety of British sausage contains a cereal binder. If this wasn't present then the sausage would disintegrate. There's also likely to be some added pork fat so that the sausage cooks evenly and remains moist. --Ef80 (talk) 18:27, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the rest of it made of? 
Talk:Afflicted (band)

message: hey i didn't have much time to do any research on this band coz this week is exam week for me at school, so can someone please do more research and add more info.  thanks =) <FONT FACE="Rockwell Extra Bold" COLOR="#FF0002">  ▓░ Dark Devil ░▓  ( Talk ♥ Contribs ) </FONT> 09:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Afflicted
Talk:John Wilbur Chapman

message: I have a copy of his book, Day by Day published in 1901 by United Society of Christian Endeavor Boston and Chicago 107.77.195.81 (talk) 15:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book title, Day by Day
Talk:SV Tenacious

message: The Tenacious is noted as the STS (sail training ship) in the text, but the SV (sail vessel) in the name. So, which is it? A ship only has one prefix, so she isn't both.31.208.103.192 (talk) 13:17, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: SV or STS?
Talk:I Found Out

message: From the article: "This double reference, to Paul the Apostle and bandmate Paul McCartney, may imply that he believed the Beatles were not loved for their music so much as worshipped as gods."
The phrase "may imply" obviously describes this as original research so I will delete it. Unless you have a quote from John confirming that, this is pure speculation.70.91.35.27 (talk) 16:59, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I got it from a music critic's book called "1001 Albums You Must Hear Before You Die." So not directly from John, but seemed to me that this was the standard interpretation. I could change the line to something that is closer to what was actually printed...I've found an online version of the book section on Plastic Ono Band here. http://www.superseventies.com/lennon1.html --AaronM (talk) 13:38, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paul? 

message: Upon its release, much of the controversy over I Found Out, which contained the line "Some of you sitting there with your cock in your hand", which was similarly censored at the record company's request. Also the line "I seen religion from Jesus to Paul" which is comparable to the Paul is Dead rumor. The lyrics are some of Lennon's most vitriolic, taking shots at religion, his parents and drugs. --NRKfan (talk) 23:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception
Talk:Isolation (John Lennon song)

message: There's an organ in there... anyone know who is playing it?Airproofing (talk) 00:58, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organ ? 

message: How about having a listen to "The Gunner's Dream" from The Final Cut? I think that oughta pretty much lay any speculation to rest.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.138.230.41 (talk) 02:40, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re a citation for the Waters quote
Talk:Malaysian Federal Roads System

message: Is it legal or illegal to ride a bicycle on a freeway in Malaysia?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.49.165.242 (talk) 14:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Freeways and bicycles
Talk:Malaysian State Roads system

message: Just to inform you that Sarawak has the most state roads, and there is no such fact as "Sarawak only has federal roads". Thank you.
Pinangjawa (talk) 14:12, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sarawak State Roads
Talk:IULM University of Milan

message: Much of this article is cut and pasted from the IULM website http://www.micri.iulm.it/default.aspx?idPage=5205 The bias is clear. --Duncan (talk) 06:58, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have edited this guff down and removed the POV template. --Duncan (talk) 07:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias; copyright theft
Talk:Lake Leelanau, Michigan

message: i think there was too much discussion of a private school on the town's article.  perhaps the June 5 editor should write a separate article.  Also, the link, once it was corrected, doesn't source any of the detail provided, including current detail; so sourcing is questionable.  Comments welcome. Journalist1983 10:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: private school
Talk:Sâhib Ata

message: Sâhib Ata is not a beylik but a person. Beyliks are the independent principalities founded by Turkmen warlords on Seljuq land following the Mongol invasions of the 13th century. Sâhib Ata was a Persian and very much involved with the Seljuq court and Seljuq-Mongol politics. He and his descendants to the second generation held land in north-western Anatolia as a sort of fief of the Seljuqs, who were in turn vassals of the Mongols.
In short, this article ought to be developed as biography not as beylik.   Aramgar 19:51, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography not Beylik

message: This article contains the phrase “Anatolian Seljuk Sultanate.” I have noticed this and other similar designations that trip over themselves trying to avoid using the word Rûm. The Seljuqs of Konya thought of themselves as “Sultans of Rum.” We ought to use “Sultanate of Rum” or “Seljuk Sultans of Rum” or some such.  Aramgar 20:14, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Anatolian Seljuk Sultanate ''vs'' [[Sultanate of Rûm]]
Talk:James Beard Foundation Award

message: I reverted the removal of the award recipients by @Graywalls because I disagree with the position that the listing is against WP:NOTWEBHOST. Many awards list its recipients (see Guggenheim Fellowship, Academy Awards, List of AIGA medalists) so the list is appropriate for the James Beard Foundation. A reorganization or split of the information would be more appropriate. 9H48F (talk) 15:56, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I also disagree with Graywalls. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:24, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverting removal of award recipients

message: Should there be a separate entry for Who's Who of Food and Beverage in America? ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:36, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who's Who of Food and Beverage in America 

message: I've split this off to List of James Beard America's Classics. Valereee (talk) 00:44, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Valereee Thanks! I've just created James Beard Foundation Award for Best New Restaurant. Would love to see similar lists for other categories. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:49, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Great! Valereee (talk) 01:39, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  America's Classics