Talk:Nouvelle Droite

message: The article states that the arguments of this thinktank draw from fascism - how about presenting these arguments and letting the reader judge whether they are fascist or not? This is hardly NPOV, and seeing as the article contains nothing about the actual viewpoints of the group, it's quite bad. I'm not French, I don't have any resources to contribute to this article with, but it needs help. Joffeloff 15:20, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Like the Alain de Benoist and GRECE articles, this one needs direct quotes too. You cannot just plumb together broad anthologies in the reference or further reading section—books that have only 1 or 2 pages on the French situation. Intangible 03:02, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Which of the books have you read?  Please cite the pages that concern you.  I have them all.  I work in a library.--Cberlet 03:05, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Note to Intangible: Please go to Talk:Front National (France) where we can have a broader discussion with other editors about your numerous deletions of criticisms on pages concerning the European New Right.--Cberlet 13:57, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The FN is not part of the (European) New Right. Intangible 14:14, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  So 

message: Let's both back off a few days and see what other editors have to say.--Cberlet 19:48, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually you misrepresent the dispute. I have only used Minkenberg's definition of the New Right, who defines it to include the Nouvelle Droite, Neue Rechte, Nieuw Rechts, etc., and Paul Weyrich / Free Congress Foundation. Maybe User:Cberlet should talk to Minkenberg instead, all I did is to cite a scholarly article published in a refereed journal, and used that to create the introduction of this article, which has since been utterly changed by User:Cberlet. Minkenberg's definition of New Right is ofcourse different than that of the New Right, but that is no problem, since the New Right article contains heterogeneous movements, while Minkenberg's definition is homogeneous. Intangible 20:04, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for Comment filed

message: Why is this article connected to the "WikiProject Fascism" when the Nouvelle Droite rejects fascism and totalitarian governments due to their centralizing and imposing forces, which destroy organic communities and signify civilizational decadence?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.243.181.177 (talk) 21:42, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, this is highly inappropriate and hardly NPOV. 136.242.105.236 (talk) 01:43, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: they just say they're against fascism while they have all the same principles, just want to slap a new name on it, and reliable sources have pointed this out. Popish Plot (talk) 16:57, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Fascism

message: The Traditionalism article, being concerned with a philosophical/religious movement, has only a tangential relation to this one. An in-paragraph ref. would be warranted, but the redirection at the beginning of the Ideology section is misleading. I will wait a week in case there are objections, and then make a change. MT Editor (talk) 14:18, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to Traditionalism 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:22, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:22, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: I noticed there are similar pages under both the French and German terminology?
Some link, and others do not link, to the different ( english, french, etc ) pages on the same topic.
For example
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neue_Rechte
and this apparently more complete page, which in turn doesn't have a link to an equivalent German page? - yet there is such a page under another equivalent german term which has its own english page, despite it being the same topic? They do seem to be the same topic? ... "oder habe ich es nicht richtig verstanden?" ;)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nouvelle_Droite
On the french page ( https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nouvelle_Droite) , it is explained that there are various splinters of the movement that each have their respective distinctive characteristics? In such case, perhaps it might require a page that enables such overview ( although there are broad categories that bring them together ), and an understanding of how movements and political parties relate to such ideas in various countries/regions?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1811:5379:2200:20AD:1F98:87BB:2EDF (talk) 20:32, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Similar Pages?