lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Armenia–Azerbaijan relations

message: Hello dear Wikipedians and dear Étienne Dolet, 
I agree there are always ceasefire violations between conflict parties but killing of civilians is not common case therefore I think it should be included in this article. In addition, it is fully clear that this incident worsened the current situation of Armenian Azerbaijani relations and caused assumptions to rise about escalation of new Karabakh war. 
Thanks.
Regards, 
GulchinHuseynova (talk) 07:18, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see WP:NOTNEWS. Your addition does little to prove that this incident has a major long-standing impact on Azeri and Armenian relations. Neither the sources nor the addition in the article make that clear. There's been many incidents like this during the conflict. Unfortunately, civilians are getting killed from both sides. But adding each and every incident would be repetitive and not very helpful for our readers. Étienne Dolet (talk) 07:26, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

text: It is an individual incident that is notnews in relation to the subject of this article, Armenia–Azerbaijan relations. It is also cherrypicking for effect as I am sure you are fully aware that the shelling was a direct retaliatory response to Azeri ceasefire violations that resulted in the killing of Armenian servicemen. So you could not add one without the other - but I think that individual ceasefire violation is also notnews. However, if it can be found, adding some sourced content mentioning that there is almost continuous low-scale conflict along the supposed ceasefire lines would seem to be useful. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 20:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of article-related info

message: Since they were civilian losses, we should be careful naming them in a general articles.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yahya Talatin (talk • contribs) 19:46, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Names removal

message: I think it would benifit to have a section for the Issues/disagreements and tensions between the two parties. There are similar sections in other pages about bilateral relations. Midgetman433 (talk) 20:36, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Section for Outstanding Issues  

message: can the 2023 september conflict be added ? 2600:6C50:1B00:32BE:8411:83AA:F7DC:ED84 (talk) 04:58, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  can the 2023 conflict be added to the wars
Talk:Nottingham–Lincoln line

message: A lead section to introduce the line and give context rather than the rather than an abstract statement about line speed would help. - BulldozerD11 (talk) 00:03, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

message: The article seems to concentrate unduely heavily on Newark Northgate station, which isn't even on the line. 87.75.117.183 (talk) 21:38, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newark Northgate 

message: There's overlap and repetition between these two sections. Is that necessary? 92.40.179.196 (talk) 20:09, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't interpret this as disrespectful but why don't you just go ahead and make the edit? Afterbrunel (talk) 11:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Operations and Services sections
Talk:1990 NCAA Division I men's lacrosse tournament

message: Why was Syracuse's participation in the tournament was later vacated by the NCAA Committee on infractions?  What where the infractions?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Thuff (talk • contribs) 13:55, May 24, 2008
: I will add it, hold on. --Yarnalgo talk to me 01:58, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Infractions
Talk:Leonard Lehrman

message: :This material is licensed under CC-By-SA only. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:43, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Most of the content for this page comes directly from one personal website.  Major rewrite is needed to avoid WP:SELFPUB. DutchTreat (talk) 00:09, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Self-Published?

message: Grunionspawn (talk) 02:00, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivial
Talk:Chevrolet Tracker (Americas)

message: There's a minor problem with the page layout in that the [edit] tags are displaced to the bottom. They seem to be interacting with the content somehow, but I'm unable to figure this out which is why you see 6 edits in a row with no apparent change. I should have used preview, but I thought it was a simple fix - it wasn't. Hoserjoe 18:11, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page layout

message: Shouldn't this article have been merged with the Suzuki Vitara/Escudo/Sidekick article? They are the same car after all  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.217.29.141 (talk) 06:32, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No - different trim and engines and different dealers & parts chain.  there is no Tracker X-90, for example, no Tracker DOHC 1.8 engines, and Tracker didn't have LX Sport trim versions. Santamoly (talk) 18:01, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging

message: This article has zero references. 
--FIRExNECK (talk) 06:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Now there are, but I had to delete two.  One was a MySpace video from an anonymous source, which doesn't meet WP:RS.  The other had nothing to do with the section where it was included; it was a different lawsuit.  ThatSaved (talk) 16:33, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A pity.  The Myspace video is a priceless and valuable reference produced by Suzuki during the Consumer Reports trial. It showed how Consumer Reports fabricated evidence against Suzuki.  It's now almost impossible to find the video anywhere else.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.155.171.63 (talk) 20:54, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: The mini-SUV Chevrolet Trax, presented in 2012, is marketed in Latin America and Russia under the nameplate Tracker. If this article about the older, completely different, because Suzuki-based "Tracker" exists, there can't be a simple REDIRECT from Chevrolet Tracker to Chevrolet Trax. 
So, what is needed? This article needs to be moved to a new title, e.g. "Chevrolet Tracker (Suzuki-based)" or "Chevrolet Tracker (1989-2008)" -- maybe one should split the article and integrate the parts in the articles on the respective original Suzuki-cars. Then the remaining REDIRECT article "Chevrolet Tracker" should be converted in a disambiguation page with links to the article Chevrolet Trax and to the article(s) on the Suzuki-based earlier Chevrolet Tracker. 
I will do this by Monday, if nobody else does it before. --L.Willms (talk) 13:25, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chevrolet Tracker should be a disambiguation page
Talk:Velocity (album)

message: Are you going to finish this page? If not I'll give it a shot. I'm a quick study. Thanks. I Love Tom Cruise 18:44, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Estark?

message: Already started, but needs work. Can you maybe do "House of Miracles"? Thanks. I Love Tom Cruise 19:42, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nevermind
Talk:Touchstone Theatre

message: Why is this like advertising?? How to make this right??--Donkey7471 18:45, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Charlottetown-Rochford Square

message: This page should be merged with Charlottetown-Brighton. In fact all 27 provincial districts need to be merged, with their predeccessors. GoodDay 18:46, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been merged, all of them have been. GoodDay 22:44, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Ben James-Ellis

message: I have removed the whole interview from this article as it isn't in any way of encyclopaedic and probably has a copyright. The heading What Next? was very chatty so I integrated the short section into the article. As for the interview, all we need is maybe one important point from it if someone could do that. Eagle Owl 18:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved the page (as you may have noticed!) to Ben James-Ellis, which is how his name appears on the Hairspray cast list. Dafyd (talk) 13:17, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Grolier Club

message: The photo of the exterior of the Club is actually that of the building in which the Club was housed long ago, and for just 27 years (from 1890 to 1917).  The building in which it's been housed for nearly a century since then is at 47 E. 60th St.  Can someone provide a photo of the facade of that building, so it can replace the existing (and inaccurate) photo, and correct coordinates to the present location as well?  Thanks! Bricology (talk) 07:47, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  present club location, photo and coordinates 
Talk:Public Storage

message: This WSJ article says Public Storage is "known for its orange doors." Seeing as it's something the company is "known for" I suggest it be mentioned in the article at the end of the second paragraph of the Operations section. Something like "The company is known for using orange-colored doors on its storage units." CorporateM (Talk) 22:50, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think this information is notable enough to include it in the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:17, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested Edit
Talk:Niagara Falls State Park

message: The claim to be the oldest US state park seems to be contradicted by the page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_park#cite_note-0  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.68.54.223 (talk) 01:14, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Yosemite was established as the first state park in the US, the "Yosemite Grant".  http://www.150.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=27539 Tmangray (talk) 01:36, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Oldest State Park?
Talk:Niagara Falls station (New York)

message: Niagara Falls Customhouse and Interpretive Center is the official name of the station as seen here https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-oQ8ZxoDSUpw/V50cM6vI80I/AAAAAAABecE/Au-q28kOsewlAaTKsS67RcJgL64EMRjxQCKgB/s1600/IMG_20160730_132550.jpg Mo2010 (talk) 21:34, 06 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: , the issue is that from what I can see, no reliable sources use the name "Niagara Falls Station and Customhouse Interpretive Center". Most simply call it the "Niagara Falls station" or similar. Wikipedia articles need to follow the WP:COMMONNAME as established in reliable sources. If the full name catches on, we can move the article, but until then it's better to follow what the sources are using.--Cúchullain t/c 21:37, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: , with all due respect if the station has an official name that it should go by that name. Syracuse has the William F. Walsh Regional Transportation Center and vary few people call it that. The article is really inaccurate without the official name. Mo2010 (talk) 21:48, 06 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand where you're coming from, but that's not how Wikipedia's article title criteria work. I notice that the station's own sign has "Niagara Falls Station" in much larger letters than the second part, so I doubt any reader will be confused by the current title. Again, if sources do start using the full name, we can look at it again, but at this point not a single source I can find actually uses it.--Cúchullain t/c 22:04, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

text: Agreed with Mackensen and Cúchullain here. Given that zero sources even use that name, it might not be anything more than a creatively written sign. Common names should almost always take predence over little-used vanity names. Anyone saying they're catching a train at the The Governor Michael S. Dukakis Transportation Center at South Station will probably miss their train by the time they finish that mouthful. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:08, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:St. Mary's Cathedral, Tallinn

message: In Tallinn neither cab drivers nor any hotels have ever heard of "St. Mary's Church". The church is mainly known as Tallinn Cathedral (which translates into Dome Church). Why do we have this odd name? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:16, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there are three cathedrals in Tallinn so I guess that rules out "Tallinn Cathedral". The article has only one reference in English which offers either "St Mary's" or "Dome Church". A bit of googling shows that most sources mention both names. I don't think there's a strong case for moving the article, but creating a redirect from "Dome Church, Tallinn" (and variants) couldn't do any harm. Tammbeck (talk) 18:39, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Since you seem to be knowledgeable, could you please clarify the "three catedrals" bit by listing them clearly in the Tallinn article? This church is the only one (I believe) which is called "the Cathedral" in Estonian. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:04, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The other two cathedrals are Alexander Nevsky Cathedral, Tallinn and St. Peter and St. Paul's Cathedral, Tallinn. The Tallinn article doesn't have a religion section, but List of cathedrals in Estonia might be a useful link. Tammbeck (talk) 12:49, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

text: I've edited "Tallinn" so all three notable cathedrals are mentioned, created redirects to "St Mary's" and added links to the "list of cathedrals in Estonia". I've discounted the Orthodox Cathedral of St. Simeon's and St. Anne's, which does not have its own article in English. Tammbeck (talk) 15:38, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad article name?
Talk:List of Freddy's Nightmares episodes

message: A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion 
or exclusion of episodes and characters, as well as other fiction articles. Please 
visit the discussion at 
Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 11:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters

message: I'm still not sure where this title comes from. The only onscreen title given is "FreddySomething" (or some capitalisation variant thereof). An online search shows "The Light at the End of the Tunnel" mostly as the title, but no site explains why since that's never put onscreen. In fact, the Epi-Log listing gives "Freddysomething". There's got to be an explanation for this. Bacteria (talk) 12:36, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Light at the End of the Tunnel
Category talk:Intelligence tests

message: I have posted a bibliography of   Intelligence Citations for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in those issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research and to suggest new sources to me by comments on that page. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 16:52, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intelligence Citations Bibliography for Articles Related to IQ Testing
Category talk:Personality tests

message: IMO, the MBTI articles belong under Personality Typologies, not under Personality Tests. That's where most of them are currently categorzed, so I'm removing the category Personality Tests from the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Gifts Differing articles. ThreeOfCups (talk) 19:20, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Myers-Briggs
Talk:Wide Range Achievement Test

message: The "Description" section has the following:
There are two levels; level I is normed for children ages 5–0 to 11-11; level II is normed for children aged 12 through adults aged 64.
I assume that "5-0 to 11-11" means 5 years, 0 months to 11 years, 11 months, but this is not at all clear (unless there's some kind of convention that I'm not aware of.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkgree (talk • contribs) 15:12, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification needed
Talk:Family Life Network

message: Hello. I was asked to pass on the following message from the CEO of Family Life. The message is being posted in the Talk section due to the conflict of interest. - Alan Gustafson, Creative Services Director at Family Life
As CEO of Family Life Network, I would like to ask you to change the following statement that you have regarding this organization:
"Much of the network's revenue comes from acquiring translators in the commercial broadcast band, of which it has compiled a massive network, and flipping them to commercial broadcasters."
 
We have a $4.5 million annual budget of which 92% of that comes from listener donations.  We were able to sell a few translators in the past two years because we no longer needed them as we have utilized the leasing of HD side channels to allow one of our translators fill-in power in certain markets.  We've only sold 5-6 translators in markets where we no longer need them to help fund the purchase of other translators in areas where we don't have good coverage.  I'm not sure where you came up with that statement as it is far from the truth.
Thank you for making this change!
Rick Snavely, CEO / Radio Network Manager at Family Life  /  
Phone: 607.776.4151 x217  /  
Fax: 607.776.6929  /  
P.O. Box 506 bath, ny 14810  /  
ricksnavely@fln.org  /  
www.fln.org
Creatives1 (talk) 16:55, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy Regarding Revenue
Talk:Tim Buckley/to do

message: There's only one photo of Buckley in the article that was uploaded via "fair use". There must be more free images out there, (CC-BY-SA) that should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons via Creative Commons for this article. Any article hoping to reach GA status or FA status really should have more photographs of the subject, if at all possible, and Buckley didn't die 100 years ago! We need to find more photographs of him during his short life. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 19:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos
Talk:USS DeLong (DE-684)

message: I thought, the ship was named after the George_W._DeLong? 80.83.239.19 (talk) 19:46, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On the page for Half Moon Bay there is a photo of the Delong run aground on the beach (apparently there), but no link to this page, and no explanation of the event in the text. Can this be expanded upon on both pages? I searched Google very quickly but found no data about this event. I didn't look hard though. 72.228.157.169 (talk) 13:00, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That was a different ship, the USS DeLong (DD-129), named for a different DeLong. Dhtwiki (talk) 11:36, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Ran Aground
Talk:RMS Empress of Asia

message: See explanatory comment at Talk:RMS Empress of Canada (1928) --Tenmei (talk) 19:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains]]
Talk:Look at That Girl

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 18:51, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Sonnenberg Gardens

message: In the small panel in the upper right of the page Ernest Bowditch and John Handrahan are listed as the architects.  In the article proper, Francis Allen is said to be the architect.  Which is it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Britishisles (talk • contribs) 12:01, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Architect
Talk:Yelsinism

message: I note that ther are over 600 google hits, some which look like they may be notable references -- i haven't had time to examine them throughly. But if this is notable, the article clearly needs cleanup. and citations. Some neologisims are notabel, and I can't yet tell if this is one. DES (talk) 19:18, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, it might be notable.  If so, we've got 5 days to get reliable references listed here.--Danaman5 19:32, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

text: A misspelled article title can always be handled with a move, ther is no need to delete for that. Is there any question that this is a simple mis-spelling? DES (talk) 20:09, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Please move this to "Yeltsinism", the correct spelling. FredCups 16:43, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved. --Stemonitis 16:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Valentown Hall

message: TNstingray, thank you for better structuring the content for this page and for your collaboration in coming to a mutually acceptable understanding of how best to present Valentown!
Lynne from Valentown (talk) 21:24, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem! I think structure-wise after both of our series of edits, things look pretty good now, allowing others to come in and tweak wording, phrasing, etc., and even the order of certain sections. TNstingray (talk) 20:03, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Collaboration
Talk:WCLH

message: This article is thin on references.  Anything that cant be cited with a verifiable 3rd party reference may be removed.--Rtphokie (talk) 12:12, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  references 
Talk:Honors Tutorial College

message: Students "benefit" from their enrollment in the college? This sounds like an advertisement.
130.49.147.42 19:24, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Leicester City F.C. squad

message: This revert by Skitzouk of my good edit confused me. The summary the players haven't left and are still part of the squad, plus u messed up the way it looks on the page gave no clues.
the players haven't left and are still part of the squad
:No-one has disputed this.
u messed up the way it looks on the page
:The default sort for squad templates per consensus is by squad number. If there are no squad numbers, they are to be sorted by name.  The squad numbers were removed by Skitzouk, and I took this in good faith, such is the wont of many clubs during the close-season. slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 19:26, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert