lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Independent Assemblies of God, International

message: website adherents.com no longer works, latest archived url relevant to this article I've found is http://web.archive.org/web/20190617073639/http://www.adherents.com/Na/Na_322.html June 17, 2019 CzarnyZajaczek (talk) 16:35, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  adherents.com
Talk:International Christian Embassy Jerusalem

message: The further reading section needs to be improved. Stephen Sizer is a notorious anti-zionist and has shared platforms with blatent anti-semites. Sizer is by no means an obective, credible source of christian zionism and his view should not be the only one represented in the further reading section.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.151.34.125 (talk) 21:35, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There's a Miss Holocaust Survivor Beauty Pageant? Doesn't that seem like rather poor taste?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.156.95.130 (talk) 02:16, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vipera

message: A photo or drawing of a viper giving birth would add greatly, as would an explanation of how the young grow and whether they are immediately independent. Sorry I have not the skill to do it myself. The San Antonio (TX) Zoo has a photo in Sept. 5, 2008, Express-News but that would not meet Wikipedia requirements. Cwilsyn (talk) 15:49, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's an image for you: :Image:Nerodia rhombifer2.jpg. It shows a harmless diamondback watersnake (Nerodia rhombifer, found in North America) giving birth, but it is exactly the same with many other species of snakes (see Ovoviviparity). Actually, what such snakes do is lay eggs that have fully developed embryos and no leathery shell -- only a transparent membrane, as you can see in the image. The advantage of this, as opposed to just laying the eggs in a suitable spot somewhere and leaving them to their fate, is that the female can better better regulate their temperature as she regulated her own (by seeking warm areas in a cool environment and cool places in a hot one). Also, I imagine she can afford them a little extra protection. It's considered a more advanced reproductive strategy. The neonates are small-scale replicas of the adults, fully able to take care of themselves. There are been documented cases of females that displayed possible guarding behavior over recently born live young (e.g. see Agkistrodon piscivorus#Reproduction, last paragraph), but whether this was actually the case is open to debate. Basically, whether they hatch or are born alive, as soon as they emerge into the world they are on their own. After that, under natural circumstances most species take at least two years to reach sexual maturity. --Jwinius (talk) 00:00, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustration of actual birth? 
Talk:Jesus and history

message: There are many articles on Jesus, as can be seen at Jesus and History. Much of the content overlaps. Would it not be a good idea to merge these sites, with brief and focused fork articles to expand on certain points without repeating all the detail over again? Wdford (talk) 10:31, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed mergers 

message: we don't do list of Wikipedia in article space. As such, this page would belong under Portal:Contents, where such lists are proper. 
But the problem goes beyond that. There are a lot of difficult to maintain articles, all discussing "Jesus and history", all defended vigorously by their respective WP:OWNers.
This mess would be comparatively easy to sort out by an experienced editor given free hand, but it has been festering for years due to the concerted resistance on the part of  editors with both religious and anti-religious povs. 
At the moment the situation is a good example of what Wikipedia wants to avoid at all cost, a set of articles discussing "Jesus and history" from the religionist pov, and a set of counter-articles discussing the same from the anti-religion pov. The editorial solution is plain enough, a set of circumspect mergers into clean WP:SS structure. But the problem is political, not editorial. --dab (𒁳) 10:08, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: towards a solution of the Jesus mess
Talk:Justice (virtue)

message: Why the Christian emphasis? The most robust discussion of justice as a virtue comes from Aristotle, and the article should reflect that. If, in Christianity, justice is related to charity, that's fine, but it ought to be moved from the introduction and cited accordingly. Aristotle would fundamentally disagree with this statement, as justice is disinterested and charity is interested. Bstouttt (talk) 17:02, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Christianity
Talk:Kate Booth

message: The lede is where we go to find such questions answered.  But all we're told is she was her parents' daughter.  Oh really?  If we can't say any more about her than that, the article should be deleted.  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 08:32, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 21:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is she notable?
Talk:Lay speaker

message: Should this re-direct to Laity as does Lay preacher, or would it be better to create a corresponding article for Lay preacher?  dbfirs 22:27, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I've changed my mind because Lay Preacher is a general term, and there are separate articles for the denomination-particular appointments of Lay Speaker (US),  Local Preacher (UK & AU), and  Lay Reader (UK & US). dbfirs 22:51, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lay Preacher
Talk:Letter to Flora

message: There has been debate about whether or not Flora was a Christian that Ptolemy was attempting to influence (making him more sinister), or whether she was sympathetic to his teachings.  I simply made her identity to "woman" to make it more neutral.  208.105.125.98 (talk) 19:20, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flora's Theological Status 

message: As a lay reader, a rough estimate of the date of really any historical information would help very much. I recently read about Alexander the Great's general named Ptolemy, and came to try to find out if he was the same Ptolemy who wrote the Letter to Flora. I now know he was not, but no thanks to the Letter to Flora page. With a prominently listed date approximation I could have figured out what I wanted to know merely by viewing this page.  
I hope someone will read this and update the article to make it more useful to other readers like me.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.43.245.117 (talk) 17:18, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  date, please
Talk:Liberian Catalogue

message: Catholic historian, Bishop Lewis Du Pin (d. c. 1725), wrote; ‘Sadly, the catalogues of Bishop Eusebius are forgeries or inventions of later times’. ‘De Antiqua Ecclesiae Disciplina’, Bishop Lewis Du Pin (Folio, Paris, 1686) - http://www.vatileaks.com/_blog/Vati_Leaks/post/Mythical_Vatican_predecessors/
‘As for the pretend catalogues of succeeding bishops of the different assemblies from the days of the apostles, exhibited by some ecclesiastical writers, they are filled up by forgeries and later inventions. Thus diocesan bishops came in, whose offices are considered as corruptions or dishonest applications: as dictated by the necessities of the church, or of instances of worldly ambition’. ‘The Authentic and Acknowledged Standards of the Church of Rome’, J. Hannah D.D., 1844, p. 414 http://www.vatileaks.com/_blog/Vati_Leaks/post/Mythical_Vatican_predecessors/
Then, early in the 16th Century, a strange document appeared called the ‘Liberian Catalogue’ and it purported to record the lineage of popes ‘from St. Peter to Pope Liberius’ (366). However, in later times the Vatican admitted that that document was of ‘a suspicious nature and not deemed reliable’,* it being just another of hundreds of Vatican forgeries. Catholic historian, Bishop Lewis Du Pin (d. c. 1725), added; ‘Unfortunately, the Liberian Catalogue is not genuine’** and by such false documents does the Vatican claim ‘apostolic succession’. However, Erasmus got it right when he frankly admitted, ‘Succession itself is imaginary’,***
* ‘Annales Ecclesiastici’, Folio xi, Antwerp, 1597, Cardinal Caesar Baronius
** ‘De Antiqua Ecclesiae Disciplina’, Bishop Lewis Du Pin (Folio, Paris, 1686)
*** ‘Erasmus’, Desid, in Nov. Test. Annotations, Fol. Basil, 1542
http://www.vatileaks.com/_blog/Vati_Leaks/post/Mythical_Vatican_predecessors/Easeltine (talk) 15:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The catalogue is part (a small part) of the Chronography of 354. The idea that this is a "Vatican forgery" runs against all modern scholarship (and there's a lot of that). That it was a compilation made in 354, reflecting the understanding current then, and not in fact an accurate reflection of the very early church, is not controversial. I suggest you look at scholarship more recent than Erasmus, 1686, 1725 or 1844.  The article could do with some changes, but not using these sources. Johnbod (talk) 15:47, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claims the list are false
Talk:Limelight Department

message: The article in the lead implied they began producing films in 1891, when later it states they only made lantern slides until 1898. Then it says that while it operated, until 1910, it was the largest producer of films, making 300. The Internet Movie Database  shows that among other major early film producers Edison Manufacturing Company [U.S.] produced 1443 films through 1910. If we restrict the comparison to the years Limelight produced its 300 films, apparently 1898-1910, Edison Manufacturing Company still produced several times as many as Limelight, 1153 oer IMDB. Pathé Frères [France]  produced 871 films 1907-1910. Edison (talk) 20:17, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Not so early, not so large.

message: According to this reference Hammond, Margaret. 2004. Film Pioneer [Henry Howse]. The Salvationist (15 May): 10, www1.salvationarmy.org.uk (accessed 15 January 2009) Henry Howse was instrumental in establishing the Limelight Department but he is not mentioned in this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bebofpenge (talk • contribs) 04:55, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Henry Howse

message: The link at the foot of the page to the ABC website is broken. The next nearest relevent link is to an episode of "Rewind" telling the story of Limelight: http://www.abc.net.au/tv/rewind/txt/s1230009.htm
--Icabelieveitmei (talk) 21:03, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken link to ABC

message: Citations needed for statements about Soldiers of the Cross. Where did the information about budget and production come from? Could the editor please provide.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Betarhoiota (talk • contribs) 03:40, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification on sources for Soldiers of the Cross
Talk:Catholic lay organisations

message: Rather than switching this list to those with questionable status, wouldn't it be better to list all those bigger than 1,000 or 5,000 and divide them into those on the official list and those who have uncertain status? The Directory of International Associations of the Faithful just list them while this page gives a one-paragraph description. >> Jesus Loves You! M.P.Schneider,LC (parlemus • feci)  19:32, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size of movements 

message: * Support. Daask (talk) 12:49, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 19:44, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Catholic Congress 

message: I suggest merging Union of Prayer into Catholic lay organisations, as the former appears to be an outdated term for (certain kinds of?) the latter, with no particular content of its own. — Moriwen (talk) 21:06, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 09:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:List of papal legates to England

message: Is this list incomplete? I thought that Cardinal Lorenzo Campeggio and Archbishop Reginald Pole were also papal legates to England. PeterSymonds | talk 16:44, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's very much imcomplete.Ealdgyth - Talk 16:50, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete?
Talk:Unknown years of Jesus

message: 13 is the age of the bar mitzvah
It is now, but the ritual we know as Bar Mitzvah did not exist until the Middle Ages. We are by no means certain that a Jewish boy of 13 living towards the end of the period of the Second Temple would have been considered a spiritual adult. ubiquity (talk) 18:20, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, you might be right about bar mitzvah, but see  Technically, the Bible does not impose limits upon the marriageable age. In traditional societies getting pubic hair meant you're marriageable. Rashi inferred from the example with Isaac and Rebecca that girls may marry starting with 3 years old. Remaining Pagan after the age of 3 would have made Rebecca unfit for marrying a cohen. The rabbis insist that such requirement worked retroactively for Isaac and Rebecca. Tgeorgescu (talk) 02:05, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bar Mitzvah
Talk:Lovefeast

message: This article describes a later tradition of the Christian agape feast and contains a lot of duplicated material. It should probably be merged or renamed, with Lovefeast redirecting to agape feast. Comments welcome. Jokestress (talk) 19:35, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Agape feast? 
Talk:Man of Sorrows

message: I'm not an expert on the subject, but the iconic Man of Sorrows depicts Christ after the crucifixion and his removal from the cross, and ecce homo depicts him before, right?  Right now it says both depict him immediately before the crucifixion. NTK (talk) 08:08, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am attempting to correct this, please improve and add more references. NTK (talk) 08:13, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is wrong, isn't it?
Talk:Manducatio impiorum

message: Thanks to , for cleaning this up.  I started an article (years ago) because I was trying to figure out what the term meant, but what I was able to find out and cite from online sources was pretty sketchy.  And you are right that the wording "the role of God and the person receiving communion in putting Christ's presence into the bread and wine" doesn't describe the situation - I was trying to somehow explain what the connection to real presence is, but not succeeding very well.
I'm also fine with merging this into a larger article, because I'm not sure the subject really stands on its own very well, but I'm not sure which larger article it would fit into. Kingdon (talk) 21:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks for the help
Talk:Martyrs Mirror

message: "The Martyrs Mirror is still a beloved book among Amish and Mennonites."
Is beloved an appropriate word for Wikipedia?
Also, why does the book's name lack an apostrophe (Martyrs' Mirror)? The article doesn't explain that.--Adûnâi (talk) 20:01, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The explanation is doubtless because apostrophisation was not yet standard for possessives in English in the 1600s. Neither was American English; and Wikipedia seems unduly addicted to doing that, too. Nuttyskin (talk) 02:09, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A non-neutral PoV?
Talk:Mennonite Church Canada

message: Thanks for uploading or contributing to :Image:MCcanada logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 18:23, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for [[:Image:MCcanada logo.gif]]
Talk:Methodist Church (Canada)

message: Need  information about this school  send to Tom Cappo box 1083 fort qu appelle Sask Canada sog 1s0 2605:B100:735:E29E:A50F:C9EB:BAFD:731A (talk) 13:02, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Residential school on muscowpetung first Nation opened in 1888.
Talk:Minjung theology

message: This article is missing an important element-- what is the essential content of Minjung theology? Lulu71339 (talk) 02:46, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I will be trying to determine what the essential components of Minjung theology are and what sources I can use to verify the information. TipsyElephant (talk) 01:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

text: I will also be trying to determine all of the major theologians in the movement and possibly creating a list or table at the end of the article or at least including some prose about each theologian. TipsyElephant (talk) 01:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  No content 

message: Hello,
I just postponed CSD G13 speedy deletion of this draft, Draft:Bibliography of minjung theology, and I was thinking perhaps some of the content would be useful to incorporate here. Liz Read! Talk! 19:09, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Bibliography
Talk:Morgan Beatus

message: The first sentence of the Contents section says that the Morgan Beatus (M.644) is also called the Las Huelgas Apocalypse, and cites a Morgan Library online exhibition. However, the exhibition references M.429 when it refers to the Las Huelgas Apocalypse. Furthermore, the exhibition says that the Las Huelgas Apocalypse is from c. 1220 when the Morgan Beatus is from the mid 10th century.
I wonder if a wikipedia author got confused and conflated the Morgan Beatus (644) with the Las Huelgas Apocalypse (429)? Is there something I'm missing?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Littleguy230 (talk • contribs) 22:53, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: By the way, the external links need also a revision; some of them go to pictures from Las Huelgas beatus --ReginaManresa (talk) 17:42, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't the Las Huelgas Apocalypse a different manuscript?
Talk:Mormon apologetics

message: Unsourced article with BLP conotations.  Cheers. Collect (talk) 15:00, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oh? 

message: Ref it or dump it please. Hcobb (talk) 12:58, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is this a neutral title?
Talk:Names of Jesus and his family

message: wow this is interetsing but who were Jesus's grandparents and did he have any children?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.77.51.118 (talk) 16:48, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

message: His name is already discussed even better in Jesus (name) as well as Names and titles of Jesus in the New Testament, and the rest is already in the Brothers of Jesus with much more detail. History2007 (talk) 12:32, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that no one objected, or commented, will "just do it". History2007 (talk) 13:45, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Terradyne Armored Vehicles Gurkha

message: Please provide a reference substantiating the purchase of Armet by Terradyne and insert a sentence to that effect into the article rather than simply changing the mentions of the company. Also, is Armet now a subsidiary? If so, the name of the vehicle may remain "Armet"? Yngvadottir (talk) 05:08, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Alleged purchase by Terradyne

message: I removed the word 'Nigger' from the list of operators. This could be vandalism though it could also simply be a misspelling of the country Niger. If someone can verify that Niger uses this vehicle then feel free to add it back in. Zeb 21:19, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism or misspelling
Talk:Underway replenishment oiler

message: This article has been tagged for merging with Replenishment oiler since October 2010. Since this is significantly the same topic under two names, I propose that the articles should be merged and this article turned into a redirect. --Wtshymanski (talk) 21:03, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Better yet, merge the list here with Henry J. Kaiser class oiler ? --Wtshymanski (talk) 21:04, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposed
Talk:Velti

message: I am curious as to why the entirety of my document is repeatedly deleted when I used the ---- page within Wikipedia as a guide to my content inclusion.  Can someone from Wikipedia please explain why their content is allowable and mine is not?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elourou (talk • contribs)  
Wikipedia is composed of overworked volunteers.  The ---- is the way it is not because of bias within Wikipedia (and I'd be curious to find out what in particular you think the bias is), but because nobody's noticed it or gotten around to chop it down yet.  The ---- article needs pruning the same way that the Velti article did -- details of the management team and executive board don't belong, and a list of article at the end, with no relation to the article, don't belong either.  I'm going to go through and trim the ---- article now -- thanks for finding that for us! -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 13:21, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Colnbrook

message: colnbrook isnt in the windsor constituency- it's in the slough?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.24.34.106 (talk) 21:04, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Talk:Surface combatant

message: I can't see this being more than a dictionary definition, and would benefit from the context of the Warship article. 82.3.242.144 (talk) 16:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge into [[Warship]]?

message: Mine sweepers are not surface combatants and of course that makes sense. Mine-layers seem to fit the definition of surface combatant because they deploy weapons from their ships for the purpose of engaging other ships. Therefore I think mine laying ships should be included in the list of surface combatant ships. XXVII (talk) 07:02, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: USS Freedom (LCS-1) is a surface combatant and a part time minesweeper.  Hcobb (talk) 13:03, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mine-layers as surface combatant 
Talk:Eton Wick

message: I was born in this great village in 1972! Viva Eton Wick! Eton Wick for ever!--Wipsenade (talk) 18:41, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Farley Wood

message: This area is marked on OS maps as Popeswood.  Would it better to merge the two articles under that name?--Cavrdg (talk) 19:24, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Popeswood
Talk:Finchampstead

message: In 1100, at Finchamsted a Well boil'd up with streams
of blood 15 days, and the Waters discoloured all others
where they came, and great flames of fire were seen
in divers places. Admirable Curiosities Rarities and Wonders in England, Scotland and Ireland: page 9. 194.207.86.26 (talk) 06:41, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Admirable Curiosities Rarities and Wonders in England, Scotland and Ireland (1710) 

message: Would be good to add a pronunciation guide: is it FINCH-um-sted, or finch-HAM-sted (or finch-HAMP-sted, not that you can hear the difference in running speech)? Spel-Punc-Gram (talk) 10:52, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Frilsham

message: Add names of individuals associated with Frilsham like Dame Nellie Melba, the Australian opera singer whose face appears on the Aus $100 bill and who gave her name to Melba Toast and Peach Melba Paulfox15 (talk) 18:36, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: What is her connection to Frilsham? Murgatroyd49 (talk) 20:17, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: She lived at Hawkridge House it is claimed Paulfox15 (talk) 11:14, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Claimed by whom? Note there is no mention of Melba in the description at Heritage Gateway Murgatroyd49 (talk) 12:40, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous people