lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Andy (singer)

message: This is the same artist. The two articles should be merged.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Merge this with Andy (Andranik Madadian) same guy. Somebody check my farsi on the spelling of his name. Man farsi hgoob neist. haaa ^_^ 70.25.213.166 05:55, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is "Andranik" Andy's real first name or his father's name? If it's just his first name, I suggest to begin the article with "Andranik Madadian", and separate "Andy" as psudonym for stage.Armatura 09:36, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Andranik - first or second name?

message: <P align=center><IMG alt="" hspace=0
http://www.cherokeemusicgroup.com/ProdImages/andy-airport-cover.jpg  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.185.90.3 (talk) 07:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andy And Airport's Album 

message: Are you guys sure his stage name in Armenian is written as Էնդի? That would then read Endy... I would say it is Անդի...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.103.4.177 (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Andy in Armenian?

message: Challenged uncited text -- such as deleted uncited text -- may only be restored per wp:CHALLENGED if supported by an inline citation.--Epeefleche (talk) 03:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoration of challenged text 

message: Hi, I’d like to propose moving this article to Andranik Madadian, and making “Andy (singer)” a redirect to point to it; Madadian recently received a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame and has as far as I can tell become a well-established-enough musician to warrant a Wikipedia article under his proper name rather than a stage name which may have been more appropriate years ago when he was more obscure.  However I obviously don’t want to make the move myself until others have had the opportunity to weigh in.  Thanks!  —PowerPCG5 (talk) 23:05, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move
Talk:Clastic rock

message: redirected to Clastic rocks, which was redirected from clastic. This was done to streamline and simplify the whole thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rolinator (talk • contribs) 
If any one has any advice for formating and using wiki texts or would like reformat my contribution I'd be grateful. ---- Reevesj191 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reevesj191 (talk • contribs) 00:08, 14 December 2010
The word 'siliclastic' appears several times in this article but is NOT a word. The actual word is 'siliciclastic'. Please correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.134.238.120 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 15 September 2012‎
:"sili"ness fixed, thanks. Vsmith (talk) 23:49, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Clastic rocks

message: This page was merged from the page clastic, and the page Clastic rock. Clastic rocks was initially a sediment-only description, but also failed to recognised that there are clastic igneous and metamorphic rocks. Rolinator 06:00, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Why does this article have a plural title?  Wikipedia:Manual of Style says the singular should be used except when there's a particular reason to prefer the plural (e.g. the Beatles, etc). Michael Hardy 23:45, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the plural used here?
Talk:Perkygoth

message: Merged? Heck, I think it should be expanded.
Kai MacTane 06:02, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It will be easier to expand once its merged, since more users will see it if it's a section of a much more popular article. -Silence 06:52, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Quite frankly there's no reason for this to be its own article, and it's not clear how much expansion is really possible, if any. siafu 13:35, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Kirkus

message: Much of this is straight off the Kirkus website or some other Kirkus branded boilerplate.  I support the merge nomination, and will happily do it, taking out the NPOV text or rewriting it to POV as necessary.  Kirkus Reviews is pretty stubby right now, and could use some of the added info from this page. Deborah-jl Talk 06:04, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge, npov
Talk:Anedjib

message: http://personalwebs.myriad.net/steveb/egypt/1st.jpg lists a very different cartouche for Anedjib than the one in the image here... which one is correct, or are both correct? --Damate
This article lists Anedjib as the fifth Pharaoh of the First Dynasty, while the article on his father Den lists Den as the fifth. Similarly the articles on Djer and Djet list them both as the third Pharaoh of the First Dynasty. The differences probably go back to the controversy over whether Menes and Hor-Aha were the same person.--Syd Henderson 03:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Semde

message: Things I'd like to cover or see covered in this article:
*particular texts belonging to this division, the most famous being the Kunjed Gyalpo (all-creating king) -- and mention of how this text in particular is often (in my opinion erroneously) taken to be evidence of 'monotheism' in Buddhism
*the place of sems de in the historical development of Dzogchen
and also, a way to tie this (highly specialized) topic into the larger thread of Buddhist information in WP... making it more accessible, relevant, w/o watering it down too much 
Hmackiernan 06:28, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A lot of the same material and explanation is being recycled in these pages. Best to merge into one page as this one:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Series_of_Dzogchen 
The page explains the three series schema and why it exists.
☸Javierfv1212☸ 19:31, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Semde, Longde, Menngagde should be merged

message: Article really needs a citation for the first list of texts or it is likely to be removed again. Skyerise (talk) 17:46, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Texts section
Talk:Mortal Kombat Gold

message: This section does not fit the Wikipedia article. Is it really necessary? -- ReyBrujo 21:27, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Character bios and endings
Talk:Woman at Point Zero

message: This is not very good book! but it has some good points...
I disagree; this is a novel rich in symbolism. In fact, it focuses mainly on truth and subsequent 'veils of truth', and Firdaus's death in the end is but a consequence of her attempts to rip apart the foundation of untruth instilled by mankind. It deserves a better page than this. The proud king of fools! 18:48, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Brian Blade

message: I have been in the process of improving the use of sources for this article, something which was highlighted as part of the jazz wiki project. Working my way through slowly but looking to remove the warning banner in a couple of months. Please help! :-) Don-music (talk) 16:02, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm struggling to locate decent sources corroborating Blade's percussion equipment. The reality is that he uses a wide variety of gear, in different musical situations, and has varied his gear over time. Can anyone help on this? If not, we may have to look at removing this section altogether, or greatly reducing its size. Don-music (talk) 14:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Improving references

message: This article was pretty poorly written, so I worked on it a little, although it could still use much more work.  Ehburrus (talk) 19:03, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewriting this article 
Talk:Aérotrain

message: better than the Batmobile  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.196.0.50 (talk) 21:39, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holy crap, that thing is awesome! 

message: The article says "Less noise, because it had no wheels and so transmitted less vibration to the track.[3]" but at high speed isn't aerodynamic noise the dominant problem with high speed trains, not "wheel squeal"?
Also the Aerotrain had blowers for levitation that must have been a source of considerable noise.  This was definitely a problem on the Rohr Aerotrain. 
I don't have access to the reference but this looks dubious to me. Tjej (talk) 10:18, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of the information provided in the text is not referenced and highly dubious. For example, it says that the jet engine of the HV was "on the top". In fact the structure on top of the HV was the air intake and the engine was within the body of the vehicle at the same level as the structure at the rear which deflected the exhaust thrust as necessary. 80.0.24.82 (talk) 21:47, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  QUIETER THAN TGV? 
Talk:Tracie Andrews

message: I'm not all that comfortable about that. Do we know she is a lesbian? Maybe she's bisexual, and just happens to have had relationships with other women. Sleeping with someone of the same sex is not necessarily the same as being homosexual: cf the difference between "Men who sleep with men" and "Gay men"; they're not quite the same thing. 86.149.2.187 15:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. It's a little misleading and not really necessary, so I went ahead and removed it. Also misleading, and rather amusing, was the fact that the link to Jane Andrews re-directed to Anne of Green Gables. Figured I might as well get rid of that one, too. Midnight Bliss (talk) 19:59, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Same sex" is linked to [[lesbian]] 

message: The line "Andrews has saved the life of a fellow prisoner who attempted suicide, and this sparked fears that she could be out on parole even sooner than the trial judge had recommended." 
Fears?  Who fears the release of this woman early? "Even sooner"?  Sooner than what?  14 years?  She isn't a serial killer.  This is the kind of subjective, emotive, POV terminology you'd expect to find in The Sun.  Wiki shouldn't be used as a campaign platform to keep anyone in prison longer than determined by the due process of law.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.246.71.166 (talk) 10:09, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fears?" emotive language 

message: Is it true that she's sharing a home with the estranged wife of 'Canoe Man' Darwin? 109.154.27.194 (talk) 19:37, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sharing with Anne Darwin?
File talk:IMDB top 250.svg

message: This should be a bar graph. Zepheus 07:02, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, I'll try to get around to that sometime. silsor 21:08, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I second that, and you guys have had enough time, but I am no computer guru. Besselfunctions 01:10, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

message: by number of films for each year/decadeHillsboro 23:26, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, sum of ratings is a completely useless measure, average ratings is what we want (if we want this at all - I think it's pretty stupid because there is only a handful movies of each year anyway). --Yogi de 06:05, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs to be Normalized 

message: This is an awesome visualization but isn't it original research?
--M a s 11:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  OR? 

message: I don't understand the this pictures. Can someone explain it?
--Behnam Lot (talk) 17:55, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaning of the picture
Talk:George Rickey

message: for expanding the article today. I'd leave a note on your talk page, but since it appears to be an AOL account, there is a good chance that you wouldn't see it. You might like to consider getting a user account, it hardly takes any time to sign up and would help separate your contributions from some of the general vandalism that tends to come from shared IP AOL accounts. -- Solipsist 07:07, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article really needs more inline footnotes to document some important claims.  The sole footnote isn't enough.  Also, the description of the window latch really needs the addition of a picture.  Without it, the verbal description is nearly useless in getting the point across.  18:39, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Items needed
Talk:EN World

message: We need to improve this one drastically. Rycanada 07:12, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I believe this site was mentioned under the external links because Morrus split the "off-topic chat" off the ENWorld forums and thus CM was born. Don't have a cite to that, but if I did I'd restore the link. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 17:35, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circus Maximvs 

message: Added a number of issue tags. Article is lacks any proof of notability; emphasises for-pay services; and needs to be converted into an encyclopedia format in general. Is the subject even notable? I see that the article has apparently survived an AfD before, but that looks like it was four or five years ago. It might be appropriate to reconsider its status now. 71.233.11.177 (talk) 21:37, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unaddressed Issues
Talk:Old Major

message: " and there is no way to  escape the evil grasp of capitalism"?
This does not seem very NPOV to me. I think it is better replaced with " and there is no way to realistically escape the eventual domination of corruption and self-interest over ideals", the dampener in any real-world implementation of an ideological theory, and the real villain in Animal Farm.
--Sohan213.42.2.21 07:13, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good to me. --TantalumTelluride 15:57, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is it with Christopher Hitchens? Every Orwell article I've seen has him as if he is some kind of god. Is he the author of a standard textbook or something? Crick, for example, doesn't get the same prominence, poor old leftie. SimonTrew (talk) 16:31, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hitchens
Talk:Abdul Qadir (Taliban leader)

message: I removed this line because the press release adds no understanding as to the man's life or accomplishments.  I really do not care whether he was a patriot or not, but I do know that a U.S. press release issued in the middle of a conflict in which he was an American ally is going to be supportive of him.  I do not think the line makes the article POV, just that it fails to contribute any relevant information on the topic.  Indrian 07:19, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Press Release

message: Haji is an honorary title, and it is contrary to convention to include it in the title of the article.  
I tried to link to Abdul Qadir, which is an article about a Pakistani cricket player.  It didn't have a disambiguation link, so I created a stub under the name Abdul Qadir (Afghan leader).  At a bare minimum there should be a disambiguation link on Abdul Qadir to this article.  Maybe this article should be renamed to conform to the convention that honorary titles aren't part of an article's title.  --  Geo Swan 11:10, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Haji]] is an honorary title
Category talk:Hoonah–Angoon Census Area, Alaska

message: I have moved all relevant articles formerly in Category:Skagway-Hoonah-Angoon Census Area, Alaska to the new category. It's still red-linked though, and I'm not sure how that should be changed. Backspace (talk) 22:04, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Municipality of Skagway Borough, Alaska
Talk:The Satan Bug (novel)

message: The article mentions the real motive behind the threat to release the virus. Does that not amount to being a spoiler? The plot of the book is revealed here. I vote to remove the reference.Nitin (talk) 05:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see Wikipedia:Spoiler Paradoctor (talk) 10:49, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoiler???
Talk:R. Tam sessions

message: The best way to avoid deletion is to establish some Wikipedia-style reliable sources. To that end, I've added a "References" section and included two notable non-fan sites with information about these videos. (I've also added the article to :Category:Viral marketing, allowing it to provide examples of this Internet phenomenon.) Editors can help save the article and improve its encyclopedic quality by hunting down some further objective sources. (I'd especially like to see what Google claims Sci-Fi Wire says about the campaign, but it wouldn't display properly in my Firefox browser, so I couldn't reasonably add the link.) ~ Jeff Q (talk) 07:42, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable sources 

message: Perhaps we could add some real world info on this article by talking about viral marketing and if this was the first of its kind to promote a motion picture, etc., how well did it do, etc, etc...? -plange 00:41, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idea for expansion 
Talk:Sugar Ray (album)

message: If anybody can help, I'm trying to "beef up" Sugar Ray's albums page.  "Sugar Ray" and "In the Pursuit of Leisure" had no pages for them.  I just simply put a tracklisting and very minimal info.  I'm going to try to put more info in the albums if anybody is willing to help me out that would greatly appreciated.  Thanks
--TheGreatestofalltime 07:49, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Anchorage–Juneau

message: Archdiocese of Anchorage was merged with Diocese of Juneau to create the Archdiocese of Anchorage-Juneau. Dcheney (talk) 11:33, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is the archived link from the bolletino of the Holy See A new bishop was also named, the former bishop of Juneau and apostolic administrator of Anchorage after the departure of Archbishop Etienne for Seattle.Johnnygoesmarchinghome (talk) 12:36, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've updated the article Martin m159 (talk) 14:18, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It is fine to link those sources, because they can be archived for future reference. The trouble I have is that so many primary sources are made and you're making an analysis of them for the article. That is not what we do on Wikipedia. We use reliable secondary sources which do the analysis for us. Too much reliance on primary sources is dangerous to the verifiability of information. Elizium23 (talk) 02:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metropolitan Archdiocese of Anchorage was renamed as Metropolitan Archdiocese of Anchorage–Juneau
Talk:Lei Fang

message: I've yet to construct an full and through analysis of DOA4 concerning Lei Fang's win and loss vendetta agaist Jann Lee, but if other's comments serve me right, she has still yet to defeat him. -ZeroTalk 08:06, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Lei Fang doesn't really have an interesting story. It's just "beat Jann Lee" everytime so I don't really think it needs to get too specific. --Philo 12:21, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lei Fang 

message: reading through the past edits, some guy brought up that Lei Fang is pronounced "Lay Fong" which is somewhat of a good point. It might be wise to add a pronounciation thing to her introductory paragraph, but I don't know how to use the International Phonetic Alphabet. --Philo 12:21, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nor do I. I've simply replaced it for now, and I'll leave it to you to tweak it as you see fit. -ZeroTalk 14:10, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:   Pronounciation 

message: Evidence that Lei-Fang is interested in Hayate?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.216.174.73 (talk) 04:06, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 
Talk:DE

message: ----
Te as in "The Te of Piglet" and the "Tao Te Ching" has been eclipsed by De, which is not the definition for that meaning of the term. Please correct. Thank you.
----
As a Portuguese and Portuguese speaker I'm unaware that the 'de' particle has any nobility meaning. The only meaning it bares is a possession term (from a place or a family). I think the same applies to Spanish. I think the idea that's on the article - that 'de' associates someone with nobility - was borrowed from the German term Von - that preposition has a nobility meaning. In Portuguese or in Spanish there is a preposition that sometimes can mean a noble background: Dom or Don but that title is not considered part of a person's name (ex: Vasco da Gama or Don Quixote).
Manuel Azevedo (talk) 00:57, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Georgia Byng

message: Molly Moon's Hypnotic Holiday (2004), 
What is this book. It has no page and does not seem to generally be mentioned in articles this page links to.-- flutefluteflute  -->  talk  -->  contributions  16:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Book 3
Talk:High-strength low-alloy steel

message: I think the title should be changed to "High strength low alloy steel" per MOS:ABBR. Not everyone knows the acronym. --Wizard191 (talk) 17:39, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: High-strength low-alloy (HSLA) steel is a type of alloy steel that 
According EN standard 10020 they are mostly non alloyed steels. HSLA is rather widelly used jargon.
It is really widelly used, so may be, one can meet this term in some officional standard, for example EN 10268 is using LA - low alloy as appendix for some steels name. Anyhow these steels according principially more important standard EN 10020 are unalloyed and term low alloyed is not defined. Steels are dividet only as alloyed or non alloyed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.5.210.202 (talk) 12:08, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: See alloy steel for the difference between low alloy steel and high alloy steel. Wizard191 (talk) 14:41, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paradox - alloy ?

message: alloy steel says D6AC is a common grade. - Notably Used for Space Shuttle SRB casings. - Rod57 (talk) 12:31, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of D6AC - used for Space Shuttle SRB casings
Talk:The Destruction of Dresden

message: :This is the talk page for discussing changes to the article The Destruction of Dresden, not an Internet forum. Please note that soapboxing and other comments irrelevant to the article may be removed. --Malthusian (talk) 10:19, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006 comment

message: To be fair to Vonnegut he was a POW in Dresden when it was firebombed so any reference to Irving's book is a sidebar.
: Yeah but he did make use of Irving's book when writing Slaughterhouse-Five. Given the influence of that novel, and given its inclusion from Irving of what we now know to be inflated casualty estimates, briefly mentioning said novel on this page is justifiable. --Ismail (talk) 03:22, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vonnegut 

message: There is a sentence in the lead of this article "The book is no longer considered to be an authoritative or reliable account of the Allied bombing and destruction of Dresden during February 1945." supported by a detailed footnote and source from a court case. The sentence and footnote has been repeatedly deleted over a number of years by editors using IP addresses, presumably either for political or commercial motives. That this deletion can last for a considerable period suggests that the page is not on many editor's watch lists.
I propose that this article should have "pending changes" set to "Require review for revisions from new and unrergistered users", because readers of this article about the book ought to be warned in the lead about its modern academic standing as many older popular histories (published in the 1960s 70s and 80s) cite it. -- PBS (talk) 09:43, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to set  pending changes 

message: Why is this article anti-German propaganda? And even discussion about anything are deleted? 73.220.34.167 (talk) 22:19, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propaganda 

message: Either provide proof and links etc for this claim or remove it from the article please  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:207:E300:9894:8168:F4B6:B6EA (talk) 13:41, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  International best seller claim
Talk:Ambika (Mahabharata)

message: The article says
: After Dhritarashtra's birth, when Satyavati requested Vyasa to visit Ambika for the second time, she dared not go and sent her maid instead. 
This only makes sense if Ambika was asked to visit Vyasa, not the other way around. --Thnidu (talk) 20:22, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "visit" 
Talk:Amba (Mahabharata)

message: Amba 2402:3A80:1CD0:DCE5:2D2B:134E:5008:CACE (talk) 19:16, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amba 