Talk:Joinery

message: Hi wood is boring  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.24.133 (talk) 15:15, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Global view 

message: Why is this article not called "Joinery" or why is there not an article called Joinery?  Is it to avoid ambiguity or is it because "Joinery" is mainly an American word, or is there another reason?
It seems to me that the name of this article should be changed to Joinery, but it doesn't much matter since there is a disambiguation page for Joinery that points here.--VegKilla 20:45, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes joinery probably is mainly, but not exclusively a modern North American term, while for the Brits and Australians (and in the US in the past), it means finish carpentry. This is a constant problem in the titles of woodworking articles, where the same thing is called by different names in different places and times, while different things are called by the same name. The best we can do is make sure that all bases are covered by disambiguation pages and redirects and trying to use names that are understood by all. There is no authority out there that can say: "This is the correct name for this gizmo."Luigizanasi 15:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree this is a reoccurring problem, It might be an interesting or project for a woodworking historian to write an article on the history of woodworking terms. This might help a newcomer to woodworking navigate the disambiguation challenges.  I often come across both regional and historic differences as I learn more about wood working, some are quite interesting and some are humorous. For example clamp (US) vs. cramp (UK). As I understand it they are one and the same in woodworking. However to me a cramp is something I get when I eat too much, so now you know what part of the world I come from. --Maxelrod (talk) 00:45, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joinery 

message: When reading this article I found myself having a good idea what certain terms meant (eg end grain) but not absolutely sure. Perhaps a list of such terms together with an explanation would be useful? reetep 10:52, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: List of terminology

message: A graphical index of joint types would be nice.  I know some of the names, and a lot of what joints look like, but I'm not sure which goes with which.
I added some pictures, I think they're up to standard. I hope so.
17:40, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graphical Index 

message: The joint shown in he external link in the finger joint article is not is not box combing. That would require a row of several of the joints shown. The point about box combing is that it simulates a multiple dovetail but is easy to contrive by machine. It is therefore a cheap dovetail joint for drawers and boxes. It relies on glue for remaining together and each part of the joint looks like a comb with stubby teeth. (RJP 18:52, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The link in the finger joint article shows a weird version with only one finger, which I have never seen before. See  (the first Google hit I got), and you will agree that what is called a finger joint in North America is the same as a box-comb in the UK. Your description of a box comb is exactly what is called a finger joint in North America (or at least, what I have always seen them called in my rather voluminous woodworking library). I will fix the finger joint article.  Luigizanasi 22:22, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As to the American names for joints, I take your word for it. :-)(RJP 09:48, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Box combing

message: I have a Desk given to me which was my great grandfathers. I am trying to id the dovetail in order to find out who may have made this piece and go from there to get futher information if anyone can help me please contact me at my E mail The dovetails in question look like the following. round holes with half shaped circles on the outer edge that connect to each other. I hope this will start a disscusion to help me locate the maker of this desk thank you any and everyone.--207.69.138.137 07:08, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ([[User:207.69.138.137|207.69.138.137]] 07:08, 28 February 2007 (UTC) )identifcation of a dovetail joint? 

message: Another traditional joint joins 2 roundwood poles by cutting both back at the joint so there is lots of area for both to touch, and tying them with a large dowel. I can't remember the name of it though.
Tabby (talk) 19:12, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roundwood joint 

message: It links here, but is missing from this article.  Could s.o. please add it. Thks. --99.11.160.111 (talk) 11:55, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dutchman 

message: What about the use of splines and glue strips? The English vocabulary woodworking includes many specialized terms that need defining. Should that be in Wiktionary. They don't have a woodworking category. DCDuring (talk) 11:52, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If you feel like writing it, there's scope for an article on joints with inserted keys, splines or feathers. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:41, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing fastening methods 

message: I'm no expert, so apologies in advance.  In particular, my comment applies to lumber in house construction.
The binding I see in my ceiling joists is different from all those listed. It is like Butt and it is like Lap.  But the two joists are parallel, one is alongside the other, and the ends overlap by a foot, and they are nailed crosswise/laterally.
Thank you for addressing this in whatever way you see fit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by HaroldHelson (talk • contribs) 01:17, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing a different type of binding 

message: I won't argue whether the dovetail is or is not "more secure than box joint", but the citation (article at woodgears.ca) draws the opposite conclusion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.181.188.10 (talk) 04:39, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It changed over time.  The point of a dovetail was that it still held long after the glue had failed. Modern box joints with modern glues rely entirely on the glue, but this allows strong untapered tails so is stronger in the absolute and the glue probably lasts longer than the life of the furniture. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:24, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dovetail more secure than Box joint? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Also added a hatnote on top of Joinery (feel free to reword it). (closed by non-admin page mover) ~StyyxTalk? 20:15, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:43, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 March 2022 

message: "In British English joinery is...  in other locales"
So called "British English" (more correctly, English) is not a "locale", so the sentence doesn't make sense.
One might surmise that the standard of English required by Wikipedia is that of a pre-teen school child. So-called Wikipedia "editors" are clearly not up to the job if such basic linguistic errors are not recognised and corrected immediately. 86.190.224.83 (talk) 22:40, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basic grammar and sentence construction