Talk:Comparison of Chernobyl and other radioactivity releases

message: This is grammatically incorrect- it is always "compared with", not "compared to"- I have corrected some occurrences of this within the article, others have been corrected by other people. Please can the title of this article be changed (corrected)? 84.110.163.104 (talk) 22:52, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Chernobyl compared to other radioactivity releases

message: Why does the graph picture a normalized curve for an hypothesized element? How would be the curve for the correct, non-normalized curve for the actual cesium?... -- NIC1138 00:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goiânia graph 

message: It woluld be good to compare the Chernobyl with results of Totskoye range nuclear tests; (aim of that test was to reveal, how long can the soldiers keep their abilities after to go through the highly contaminated area). Some sources indicate, the most of participants suffered from radiation and many died; and mention the hiding of data about victims among civilians.
Then, this comparison should be transferred also to the article about Hiroshima. It is important to understand, whose atoms were stronger: American military atoms or Soviet peaceful atoms. dima (talk) 02:43, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Totskoye range nuclear tests 

message: The death toll about Chernobyl, that is vagually talked about here is suprisingly missleading. The death toll ranges from 30'000 to 400'000 (that is, if including the ultra-high cancer statistics) and there is no solid consensus about this, never was and probably will be only after some decades, at best. So I think that asumption that comparison with Hirosima is valid, should appear here. 1) human death toll - compareable (with grave difficulty of course, but still), 2) economical impact. hirosima and nagasaki are totally rebuilt, people live there, while in chernobyl that won't happen for the next 100'000 years. also, nobody, at least in europe, seem to have the money to repair sarcophagus, while hirosima and nagasaki... so chernobyl can be, again, with great difficulty, but still, compared to hirosima. 3) environmentally - the same argument as 2) - people live there, even at ground zero.
: See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_the_Chernobyl_disaster#Controversy_over_human_health_effects. The estimates by expert international organizations, which were peer-reviewed, grossly contradict the information you assert above. The numbers you give jive better with estimates performed by Greenpeace and other activist organizations.50.147.26.108 (talk) 18:24, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death toll 

message: One example would be a comparison between Chernobyl and Fukushima, in terms of released radioisotopes and dispersion of the same. Though the accidents were vastly different in terms of plant damage/destruction, hence, the release of isotopes would be different, I'm not conversant enough to make the suggested edit.Wzrd1 (talk) 00:35, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just thinking that this was needed as well. I'll have a look and see if I can find any good sources. — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 19:55, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perhaps an update is in order from someone with knowledge on the subject 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Comparison of Chernobyl and other radioactivity releases. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070121042708/http://atom.kaeri.re.kr/ to http://atom.kaeri.re.kr/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080609054436/http://www.csirc.net/library/la_13638.shtml to http://www.csirc.net/library/la_13638.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041208045727/http://www.lanl.gov/worldview/news/releases/archive/00-099.shtml to http://www.lanl.gov/worldview/news/releases/archive/00-099.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140227050928/http://www.cddc.vt.edu/host/atomic/accident/critical.html to http://www.cddc.vt.edu/host/atomic/accident/critical.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:18, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Comparison of Chernobyl and other radioactivity releases. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060923145221/http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf37.htm to http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf37.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hi
Please could someone clarify to me how the time against dose rate comparing the hypothetical nuclear bomb and Chernobyl was created?
Thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpentland2 (talk • contribs) 16:43, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Integrity of time against dose rate graph in open air