Talk:St Colman's Cathedral, Cobh

message: Should this item not be named "St. Colman's Cathedral, Cobh" rather than Cobh Cathedral? Coolavokig 13:00, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:NAME says "generally, article naming should prefer what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize". Isn't this best known as Cobh Cathedral? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:01, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name 

message: The information in this article is taken mainly from the thesis 'Visions Materialised: The building of St. Colman’s Cathedral, Cobh (1868-1917)', NCAD, Dublin, 2000 by Ann Wilson, and/or other papers based on it and published in the Journal of the Irish Georgian Society and Antiphon. Why is this not referenced and cited in the bibliography?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.45.129.200 (talk) 17:26, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: What did it cost over the 47 years?86.42.217.141 (talk) 11:31, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cobh Cathedral: source of article 

message: This article has been tagged as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  It will likely be deleted after one week unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Major contributions by contributors who have been verified to have violated copyright in multiple articles may be presumptively deleted in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. 
Interested contributors are invited to help clarify the copyright status of this material or rewrite the article in original language at the temporary page linked from the article's face. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. --MER-C 11:03, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: Dates given in the History section are contradictory, e.g. "The committee decided in January 1867 to hold an architectural competition... This competition took place in 1859..." A knowledgeable contributor needs to read it through and amend. Camboxer (talk) 14:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Peter Galloway: The Cathedrals of Ireland, , p. 55-56. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  AFBorchert (talk) 22:55, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Follow-up: thank you, , for noticing and dealing with this, nice work! Unfortunately I found that not all the copyright violation had been removed (I searched the book, which I only have snippet view of, for "dominates the quay in a most imposing way", and got a hit on page 56). That phrase is present in  by IP 94.83.253.145, which over-wrote the whole article except the stuff about the carillon. The only option was to revert to the last version before that. I particularly regret the loss of all the work put in by . Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:24, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed