lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hiller Aircraft

message: Born2flie: The Fairchild Hiller FH-1100 was submitted to the U.S. Army's Light Observation Helicopter program in 1961, as a design, and in 1963 as five prototypes. I think that Fairchild would have had to have purchased Hiller Aircraft prior to 1964 for these to be the accurate facts that they are. --05:30, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fairchild purchase

message: Question: Can the Hiller Flying Cranes and Sky Bus projects still be mentioned on this page? (Since they have been removed...) Just asking. BTW it is really heart warming that somebody still cares about Hiller these days, Thank you. Bert Racoon | Life is not a dream, it's a nightmare... 20:04, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hiller Projects
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ocean's Thirteen

message: It is remarkable that a "clear consensus" was declared less than ten hours after the nomination.  This was NOT a stunt of any sort, but a genuine nomination for deletion.  The response was unfair because several who replied failed to assume good faith, and one explicitly claimed "bad faith."  On what basis, I'm not sure.  This was NOT disruptive, I made no edits anywhere that required any kind of reversion, I didn't campaign for votes, I did nothing out of the ordinary.  This was NOT an example of "making a point" per WP:POINT, as I was not responding to any former grievance, or staging any kind of "parody."  The nomination was entirely sincere, and I maintain it was entirely appropriate.
The closing admin states "Not certain what 'Test Case for films not yet completed' means," yet I gave very clear reasons why my deletion was relevant to this specific title, and I made it abundantly clear that I hoped the discussion would shed light on the standards to be applied to films not yet completed.  I did NOT batch submit hundreds of articles to be deleted all on one basis.  Rather, I asked the editors to examine this particular article on its own merits, in the hope that the discussion might set a precident for future discussions of its kind.  If the admin truly needs further clarification of what was meant, perhaps he should review Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#How_to_list_multiple_related_pages_for_deletion, which explicity suggests "for group nominations it is often a good idea to only list one article at afd and see how it goes, before listing an entire group," and the discussion on the AfD page at Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion#Any_way_to_nominate_LOTS_of_articles, where it is suggested "If you want to mass nominate articles, you can a) start with one to set a precedent (make it clear in the AfD nomination that that is the objective, or you'll get 'why did you single out this one' counterarguments) - if theis AfD is successful, nominate the other ones."
I was entirely up front with my motives for discussing this significant issue, which was dismissed out of hand.  I gave my reasons why this particular article is of questionable notability and the sources may be unreliable.  Even if the ultimate result of the discussion would have been to keep, there would have been room for discussion... as it is, the discussion was terminated prematurely.  I'm pretty confident that not much was learned by the majority of participants.  As for me, the only things I learned were "Do NOT be bold," and "Wikipedia articles need NOT be notable by any rational standard."  Perhaps more could have been learned by all parties had there been time to say more, especially if the topic was approached with an open mind.zadignose 05:36, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Intelligent Woman's Guide to Socialism and Capitalism

message: I happen to own a copy of this book. It was written with the idealism many youthful thinkers shared about communism before grim reality took over. So sad.
Wugo 05:39, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

message: not sure if my revision works. instead of saying shaw was communist [thinker? propagandist?] and implying that the book is a naked extension of his ideology, I did something different. I granted anything overtly commie-friendly about the book as an objective quality of the book. I assumed those qualities do not need to automatically reflect on the political disposition of the author. but hey. that's just me. S*K*A*K*K 16:00, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  recent edit 

message: This is another example of what I be calling "wiki-fluff." This is just some minor book. IT DONT NEED NO ENTRY.  I say, "Delete this stuff"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.14.36.165 (talk) 19:33, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not that I think anyone cares by now, as your comment is two years old, but I beg to differ: This is a book written by a Nobel Prize laureate, who also by general consensus happens to be the second most important dramatist writing in English, and (for his own time, at least) a political writer of some importance. Rather than being deleted, I hope someone out there could extend it to covering in some detail the actual content of the book. Sirion123 (talk) 21:08, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is just a book
Talk:Sergius of Reshaina

message: Böri (talk) 10:08, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirects created, and link added.  Thank you!  Jheald (talk) 14:55, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reshaina = Ras al-Ayn, al-Hasakah Governorate
Talk:Battle of Baku

message: Was not it an allied victory, not just the Ottoman one, as the ref suggests? --Brandспойт 09:51, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Result 

message: Edit warring by new user GevorgA is unacceptable. He repeatedly removed sourced info, last time claiming that he cannot find any publications by Dr Alexander Marshall, who is a professor at the University of Glasgo, and wrote numerous books about Soviet history: . In addition, GevorgA also removed the references to the British general George Milne, who was involved in the events and had a first hand knowledge of what was going on there. That is not in line with WP rules. Grandmaster 05:26, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit warring by GevorgA 

message: According to all sources, Baku commune lasted until late July 1918, so if the battle of Baku started on 26 August, the commune wasnt part of this conflict, or the dates are wrong.--HCPUNXKID 11:44, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combatants wrong or dates wrong 

message: Tidied up cites and refs, then sorted out the mistake I made. Keith-264 (talk) 16:35, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  CE 
Talk:Maria la del Barrio

message: I approve of the merge as I have worked on this article and would like to see more of the novella articles improved.  Ronbo76 05:50, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into the article with spoiler tags Great idea 

message: The name María has an acute accent.  Shouldn't this article be merged into the other one, and not the reverse?--Ray Chason 16:09, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't the merge go the other way?
Talk:East Rochester, New York

message: I marked this claim dubious: "The southern boundary is delimited by New York State Route 31F, which runs parallel to but never enters East Rochester."  Looking at a map of the boundaries (like, say, this one) shows that a small part of the village crosses NY-31, and that even where it doesn't cross, the boundary is in the middle of the highway, not the north edge.  Powers T 14:41, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 
Talk:Daikokuya Kōdayū

message: I've heard Russian record is more in detail about when Kodayu was in St. Petersburg as he met lots of people including the prince of Russia(Paul I???).
There must be more than what Japanese people know about Kodayu and Kirill Laxman.
Need somebody who is accessible to Russian historical record or important people's diaries. He was there between Feb. 19, 1791 to around Sep. 29, 1791 and was active after May 8th. Kodayu went trip to Okhotsk with Kirill Laxman till August 21st, 1792--Orcano 06:01, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  about Russian record 

message: This article should probably be moved to Daikokuya Kōdayū to conform with WP:MOS-JP.  I'd move it myself, but it's not really my baby, and I don't want to step on anyone's toes.  It should be done before more articles link directly to this one, though. -- Exitmoose 02:06, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks--Orcano 02:01, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to Daikokuya Kōdayū

message: about here:
I would like to know if Mr. Yamashita is saying that the name "Khotkevich" was on the written records by Kodayu or that Kodayu simply kept spelling "Khotkevich" into "Khokkeichi"(ホッケイチ)  in Japanese or that authors who wrote about Kodayu commonly misspelled.--Orcano (talk) 15:08, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  about the name Khotkevich
Talk:Sto꞉lo Nation Chiefs Council

message: Please see my comments on the linked talk page.Skookum1 (talk) 18:30, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: name issue on [[Template talk:Stó:lô Nation]]

message: I just happened to find taht there are two tribal councils for hte Sto:lo, according to INAC anyway; so am replacing the contents overleaf with what INAC says; maybe there's more recent information; the other council is the Sto:lo Tribal Council, which I'll create a separate article for.  In hte meantime, I'm saving here the entries I removed from the previous version of this page:
*Aitchelitz Band
*Chawathil First Nation
*Cheam Indian Band
*Kwantlen First Nation
*Kwaw-kwaw-a-pilt First Nation
*Lakahahmen First Nation
*Matsqui First Nation
*Popkum Band
*Scowlitz First Nation
*Seabird Island Band
*Skway First Nation
*Shxw'ow'hamel First Nation
*Skawahlook First Nation
*Skowkale First Nation
*Soowahlie First Nation
*Squiala First Nation
*Sumas First Nation
*Tzeachten First Nation
*Yakweakwioose
Can't remebmer where I got that list from; but it seems to have changed.Skookum1 (talk) 18:39, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Two tribal councils
Talk:Petersen Events Center

message: I've set The John M. and Gertrude E. Petersen Events Center to redirect to this page, but should it be the other way around maybe, since the longer name, though rarely used, is the official name of the building?  Isaac 06:19, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It is in Oakland, stop deleting it. I go to Pitt, and I am not an idiot. Need further proof? Read Pittsburgh, Oakland (Pittsburgh) and University of Pittsburgh. Superbowlbound (talk) 05:19, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neigborhood 

message: Personally, I think that the funerals for the police that were KIA'd recently should be added to the notable events section. Unfortunately, I don't know if the scenario has an offiicial name to label it by. --DanMat6288 (talk) 16:48, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I will add one soon, I wanted to wait until after the ceremony, maybe tomorrow, so there could be a little content to the section. Superbowlbound (talk) 17:01, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Police Funerals 
Talk:Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation

message: India's map isn't correctly depicted 2405:201:A405:E08A:24AD:846:DC9F:BE35 (talk) 06:10, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please use correct map .
Talk:Harlem Hospital Center

message: major hospital in NYC, added refs and links, -prod. 
rewrote PR-style text. 
DGG 06:25, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What year was it founded? Badagnani (talk) 03:10, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Founding
Talk:Vested Property Act (Bangladesh)

message: How many prominent and so called secular leaders of that time and subsequent times opposed passing of this Vested Property Act which relates to depriving people of one of their fundamental rights of possessing properties of their ancestors? Babu bogra (talk) 02:34, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intriguing Question 
Talk:InterLiga

message: There is only one champion of the Interliga: the team that qualifies as Mexico 2 for the Copa Libertadores. Mexico 3 may be considered runner-up. Hari Seldon 06:34, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Champions?
Talk:Kuakata

message: The sun rising and setting? That can also be seen from the Kotka beach and Dublar Char beach. There may be more that I don't know off. Kuakata can't be the "only" beach. In fact, if I am not mistaken, any beach that faces south (like the beaches quoted here) would be able to have sunrise and sunset seen from the same site. This amazing claim needs some verification from authentic sources. Aditya(talk • contribs) 14:37, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake? 
Talk:Samuel Ball (educator)

message: Full professor at major university & thus notable; also as an academic adminstrator (corresponds to US provost)
Obviously needs ore content, but thats not a reason for deletion.
This article was written by the subjects own son. And an attempt to delete it was blocked once again by the subjects own son. Someone should look into it. --Howcomeido 19:56, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Twin-tip ski

message: in the swedish Twintip article, it says Jon Olsson invented the ski at the end of 1990s —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.233.191.18 (talk) 19:15, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invention 

message: It might be worth putting "the Olin Mark IV Comp introduced in 1974" into context. Back then there was a whole hippy aesthetic that treated skiing as a graceful art - 'hot-dogging' and 'ski ballet'. 1-leg turns, legs-crossed, backwards, 360s and tip-tail spins, choreographed to cheesy music ! I'm sure there's plenty of BetaMax clips on YouTube ... I believe FIS discontinued it as not 'macho' enough. Google "Suzy Chaffee" ! --195.137.93.171 (talk) 22:39, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at photos, the Olin's do not have much tail-lift at all. I rescued a pair of metal Head Ballet skis from a rubbish dump that are more tail-tipped. Not sure of the date, though - 78 ? --195.137.93.171 (talk) 22:46, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Juana la Cubana

message: Back around 1989 when in Guadalajara, I saw skits performed in which there was an Aunt Jemima-type character they called "Juana la cubana" that didn't reference the song. If in addition to the song there is some stock character (even a blackface stock character) of the same name, we should mention that in the article. However, I have no idea whether or not such is the case. Accordingly, I am raising the issue here as an encouragement to anyone with appropriate cite-able material on that topic to share in order to supplement the article. Lawikitejana (talk) 05:09, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Juana la Cubana" stereotypical character
Talk:Brion tomb

message: While this is not the name of the cemetery, I've looked it up and found quite a few references with this shortened name.  At least enough to justify a redirect. — Ben Stone
 07:19, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the redirect? 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ghost of a fallen age

message: You guys can say that all you want but there are 1000's of bands on here that aren't as notable as Ghost Of A Fallen Age. Yes the album may be in the "pipeline" but on Smartpunk @ this link:  you can see that out of all the albums they sell Ghost Of A Fallen Age is ranked #10 because of how many people have bought the album on Pre-Order. They are ranked above bands that have been on here for a while and are considered "more notable" just because this band is newer and you haven't heard of them doesn't mean they aren't notable. 
The band is nominated for this year's Taste Of Chaos Tour, the band's manager and label are working out details for that right now, because Alesana
who are Ghost Of A Fallen Age's label mates have just signed with Fearless Records and the owner of that label runs Warped Tour & Taste Of Chaos.
Once again the album will be sold in Bestbuy, Target, Virgin Records, Tower Records, Hot Topic, Amazon, Etc... On Feb 6th when the album is released. Again, some of the bands already on here aren't even sold in a market that large. I think you should do a little more research on a band before you go off and assume they aren't notable.
-Noregret1 06:56, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Basil Radford

message: :Image:Lady Vanishes shootout.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
— Save_Us_229 21:30, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Lady Vanishes shootout.JPG

message: If he was, fine!  But absolutely no evidence for this is given here.  (His screen "partnership" with Naunton Wayne does not count.)  Kostaki mou (talk) 01:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: A Gay Actor?
Talk:Yoheved Kaplinsky

message: To correct myself in the redirect comments, this "Yoheved Kaplinsky" article is in fact newer, but it still has more content and this title is the person's full name so it seems better to make the redirect to here as opposed to the other way around.  --Oakshade 07:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect of "Veda Kaplinsky" article
Talk:Protect Indian Family

message: Gokulpr 07:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This page continues to be nothing more than the most transparent of self-promotional pages, written the second time by the guy who wrote it the first, still posting numbers, and prolific self-serving links. I've changed the page to a redirect to the proper organization. ThuranX 12:40, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Look. You're only posting on this page, and your only purpose is to promote your own business. it needs to stop. the page should be a redirect to the SIF page. This was the major alternative to deletion in the last AfD. As you have seen fit to recreate the pages with identical 'information', I've seen fit to follow that AfD suggestion for a redirect. Since you've seen fit to revert this, I caution you, re-esstablishing the page with nearly identical information can easily lead to a second AfD. Further, to answer your repeated question, Wikipedia is NOT an advertising resource, it is an encyclopedia. That means it collects and grows with the addition of USEFUL information. Wikipedia does NOT want advertisements, which your page is. It's your group's pamphlet, not an NPOV article about the organization. ThuranX 13:49, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Archibald Menzies

message: As a newbie I am trying to insert a reference to AM's birth record. My attempt to use the same format as for a book reference has not had the desired effect. How should such a reference be made ?
Peter R Hastings 09:59, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You corrected because it was in the improper position.--Naohiro19(Talk Page/Contributions) 10:05, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It would be forty years before another European, fellow Scotsman David Douglas, would reach the summit on 29 January 1834.[2] He dropped off citrus fruit seeds that had been picked up in South Africa, so that future ships might be able to replenish their stocks at the Hawaiian islands.[4]
This is confusing.  Was it Douglas who dropped off the citrus fruit seeds, or Menzies?  And why drop them off at the summit of Mauna Loa?  (At least, the way the text reads, it implies that they were dropped off there).  A long way to climb just to eat an lemon! Felsenst (talk) 20:56, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who introduced citrus to Hawai'i?  And where? 

message: I received an old writing chest from my grandmother 40yrs ago It has a brass plate on the top that says Arch Menzies I was wondering if it belonged to Archibald Menzies Jeff1963 (talk) 18:16, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arch Menzies
Talk:List of schools in Aberdeen

message: I agree that in most cases dead links, and lists should be kept trimmed, however i have put the list of schools back in place for the reason that this is a comprehensive and full list of all the schools and is a useful resource.
I have cleaned up the code and removed all the dead links. i have also removed the tag about deletion of dead entries because as this is a full list there will be no (or very occasionally new entries) and since the list does not have a full list of entries with links. i think this list is a useful article and resource for people who want to know how many schools there are in the city and which schools are available. user:bobbacon
:Please look over Wikipedia:List guideline and Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists), in particular the part where  it says "each entry on the list should have a Wikipedia article." - brenneman 01:00, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I've put the POV tag on here as to selectively label only a handful of primary schools in Aberdeen as notable, thus implying the others are not is divisive and unnecessary. It is ridiculous to exclude schools from this list only because there is not a wikipedia article about them. Catchpole 12:08, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
File talk:Income Education 91 to 03.jpg

message: I find it difficult to tell which is the "overall" line. Could something be done to make it more obvious? Perhaps it could be a thick black line -- I think it would still be easily distinguishable from the grid lines. Cathryn 07:35, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Or better yet, put the legend in the same order as the lines on the chart. Since none of them cross this shouldn't be too difficult. 71.35.164.217 (talk) 16:32, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overall line 

message: It has been remarked that file has no description, but uploader supplied this (possibly truncated):
(I created the graph myself using data from the US Census Bureau, taken from here: . The graph shows the median household income for household whose householders is above the age of 25 in 2003 dollars, co)
So graph description or label might be
 "Median Household Income (2003 US$), Householders over 25"
Or if the Census Bureau link is still good, their labelling could be used.
Perhaps we could recreate the graph from original data?  96.42.93.148 (talk) 15:26, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description / file name
Talk:Jibril Yoonis

message: While I won't argue for this article's deletion, there is an important idea which you should understand:
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. "Verifiable" in this context means that any reader should be able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source. Editors should provide a reliable source for material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. (source: WP:V)
Best wishes, House of Scandal 13:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Verifiability