lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ramond–Ramond field

message: I fixed a large number of incorrect capitals in section headings a few minutes ago.
: 
I changed this:
:: we will also interchange p and 7-p
: 
to this:
: 
:: we will also interchange p and 7 − p
: 
A hyphen doesn't look like a minus sign, there was no proper spacing, and the p was not italicized.
: 
This is basic stuff.  See WP:MOS and WP:MOSMATH. Michael Hardy (talk) 20:50, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  style issues
Talk:Vladimir Glebov

message: Information in this article is dubious:
1. Name of Vladimir Glebov can not be found in any known list of people avarded with the title "Hero of the Russian Federation". For instance here or here. Also there is no President's decree on the official site, but search there goes back only to Y2000. Thus there is no relaible information he was awarded with this title.
2. Google search for 'Glebov' in English returns only one relevant source - the same one cited in this article. Various Google searches in Russian do not yeld any relevant results at all (there are hundreds and thousand URLs about other suspected and accused Chechen War criminals). So there is no information wheather he is a real person or not.
Levg-en 00:53, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I created the article, mainly to fill out red links on the Hero of Russia article, which I also maintain. I have no problems with the article being deleted, but I think my problem was that either I didn't know his Russian name and didn't look it up, or the source I used is very, very spotty. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 01:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I provided two more links on Glebov, including one related and one unrelated to the case. --HanzoHattori 09:20, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious Article
Talk:Morten Frost

message: A variant name is given.  Why no redirect?  Gene Nygaard 02:33, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is OK with me if you create one. But first we will have to decide which name should be the primary one. He is one of those many Danes who are generally known by their first name and middle name while the surname is almost never used. Personally I would prefer to move the article to the complete name and let the short version serve as a redirect. --Troels Nybo 11:34, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Where's the redirect?
Talk:Liberal intergovernmentalism

message: I've flagged the criticism section because it sounds less like criticism of Moravcisk, and more a bad, densely written conspiracy theory.  If someone knows of any criticisms of Liberal intergovernmentalism (and lord knows there's enough), please clean this  Steffaction 13:15, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I propose to merge Intergovernmentalism into Liberal intergovernmentalism. I think that the content in the former article can easily be explained in the context of the latter concept. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 13:54, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose Not necessary. If these two articles must be merged, it should be the other way around. 2001:8003:9008:1301:508:DAFC:A80:67EE (talk) 01:11, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing with no merge, given the uncontested objection and no support. Klbrain (talk) 13:40, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Richards equation

message: While the article says there is no analytic solution to the Richards equation I found this paper:
Barry, D. A., Parlange, J.-Y., Sander, G. C., & Sivaplan, M. (1993). A class of exact solutions for Richards’ equation. Journal of Hydrology, 142(1-4), 29–46. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(93)90003-r
Supposedly, we should mention it?
Outslider (talk) 09:41, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solution of the equation
Talk:RR Lyrae variable

message: In the lede it reads:RR Lyraes are pulsating horizontal branch aging stars of spectral class A or F, with a mass of around half the Sun's. They are thought to have previously shed mass during the Red-giant branch phase, and consequently, they were once stars with similar or slightly less mass than the Sun, around 0.8 solar masses. Well which is true half of solar mass or 80% of solar mass ? Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 13:43, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Both are true.  They *currently* have half the sun's mass (give or take).  They *previously* had 80% of its mass (several billion years ago).  No contradiction.  The paragraph even explains that they shed mass during the the red giant phase, hence they are now less massive than they were.  That sentence is not grammatically brilliant, because having shed mass doesn't really imply that they had a mass similar to or slightly less than the sun, and the cause-and-effect is backwards.  Maybe you could try to rewrite it in a way that is easier to understand by someone who doesn't already know what's going on, and grammatically better?  Lithopsian (talk) 18:45, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mass
Talk:Avatar (Avatar: The Last Airbender)

message: I feel that this article warrants being deleted, and for numerous reasons.  Most, if not all, of the information is already present on other pages, pages which are more relevent to the data, and pages which present the information more coherently.  This is largely a cut and paste from other Avatar articles, and I think it's just not necessary, and it originally actually detracted from those other articles (Since info was actually removed from them to be pasted here, but I've since put it back).  I commented on this on the Project page and nobody has yet objected, there's largely been support for my suggestion.
However, just because I don't like the article doesn't mean I can click "delete" and wipe it clean.  We have this discussion page so people can give their reasons why this page should not be deleted, because I am not the Lord and Ruler of Wikipedia...well, not yet, anyway.
Are there any reasons to keep this page? JBK405 02:48, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete
Talk:Song (airline)

message: Spotted two at Salt Lake City last Thursday (Jan 11th), Until I read this article, had no idea who "Song" were!
Sunil, Cambridge, England 131.111.36.48 22:21, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song liveried 757s at SLC January 2007 

message: This article is too short to be it's own, I think it should be merged into Delta's article.
Nrwairport (talk) 03:39, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: The article states that Song was a service on 200 flights per day serving 10M passengers.  Seems doubtful they had 10M people on 200 flights.  Was that 10M over a year?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cellmaker (talk • contribs) 15:59, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flight and passenger counts?
Talk:Prince Gabriel Constantinovich of Russia

message: Going by Wikipedia using the styles and titles individuals used, shouldn't this article be titled Grand Duke Gabriel Konstantinovich of Russia? Charles 11:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Elevation

message: There is a problem in references tags in Notes. Could somebody fix it? Thank you, Aris de Methymna (talk) 09:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Huon (talk) 14:16, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:ICC Men's T20 World Cup

message: Shouldn't a tie be considered as a win for win percentage calculation based on the end-result, i.e., super-over or bowl-out, rather than a splitting of points? Does this not simply defeat the purpose of having a tie-breaker in the end?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheInnocentBystander (talk • contribs) 13:11, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Performance of teams 

message: Need archiving here. Dey subrata (talk) 05:41, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archiving references 

message: Surely it goes number of wins, numerous of runners up, number of semis. 82.3.116.211 (talk) 12:28, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ranking overall championship 

message: @Marshyg what's your problem as you are promoting non free content on page's infobox over free content —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 11:19, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy
Talk:Silicon bandgap temperature sensor

message: This article as written is precisely the sort of example that chases non-technical people away from Wikipedia. I recall (and it's been a while) that the P-N junction has a fairly linear response of -2,1 mV per degree C with little effect from supply voltage. Diving into the mathematical formula to explain the effect just feels like being clever for the sake of it. If a young (but not mathematically gifted) person hits this page imagine what they would think? In many cases we don't need the "why" just the "does". I had this conversation with a lad I'm training recently. He was (as I when first hearing of it) utterly confused by Kirchoff's 1st law because the circuit examples and maths are overly complicated for what really is just the conservation of energy. The word circuit derives from circle after all - so view it as a loop where everything that goes in at the start comes back around is far simpler. So many other things in electronics are complex, that these most basic laws really should be kept to their bare minimum in summary to avoid scaring people off. Winfield Hill and Paul Horowitz managed this trick in The Art of Electronics, while still getting to the utter nitty-gritty of how things work. 81.97.100.208 (talk) 09:34, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the rule "-2,1 mV per degree C" is only valid for constant currents. Here two different currents are compared in two seperate elements (T_1 and T_2), so this rule is not valid. 2A02:8071:5010:7860:3C5A:D367:6E04:AA68 (talk) 10:12, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a simple opening summary
Talk:Mikhail II of Tver

message: Mikhail = Michael or I got it wrong? 2A02:C7C:A8B5:6F00:FD63:FE9:5C17:2F4D (talk) 14:37, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Mikhail is his name but it's pretty much Micheal I think Camillz (talk) 19:09, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Mikhail not Michael?
Talk:Nogai Khan

message: This article should be retitled to Nogai (ruler). The article acknowledges he was not a khan and gives no source nor suggestion that he was. It calls him "khan" repeatedly, but it shouldn't unless it is sourced.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.170.138.18 (talk) 05:17, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Nogai was not khan

message: He attacked Lithuania with northern russian princes in 1275.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Enerelt (talk • contribs) 05:55, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Solvated electron

message: Could anyone get a photo of a solution containing solvated electrons to illustrate the blue color of the solution (perhaps Na in NH3)?---- Bfesser (talk) 18:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: One item which is in error is the mention of the blue color independent of what metal cation is used. Different metals give
different colors if the ammonia solution is kept in quartz rather tha Pyrex. In Pyrex it is the sodium from the sodium silicate which 
leads to cation  exchange and the common blue color.
The important work of James Dye is totally overlooked.
--Hez (talk) 19:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: INCOMPLETE, ERRORS

message: There is mention of only an Electride being in solution. Actually there are three -
the Electride, the Alkide and the Free Electron. 
Thus, there is a lot of literature to be read.
But the article, nevertheless, should be rated as very important.
--Hez (talk) 18:34, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Anotehr Error

message: Some sources regarding the solvated electron are pointed out in the next link: --82.137.9.119 (talk) 05:02, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to sources 

message: Although the solvated electron has been described, it seems that this description is limited to a rather qualitative approach. Are there some sources regarding the involvement of the solvated electron concentration in formulas like Nernst equation?--188.26.22.131 (talk) 09:00, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Presence in equations
Talk:Mikoyan-Gurevich I-270

message: Any references on this claim?--Mircea87 (talk) 11:25, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No reference because not true--Petebutt (talk) 02:58, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Developed from Messerschmitt Me 263 

message: All propeller-driven aircraft use km/h, mph and kn as speed units. Meanwhile, all jet-powered aircraft use Mach, km/h and mph as speed units. Since the I-270 is jet-powered, it should use Mach as the max. speed main unit. - Carlo71201 (talk 
Other aircraft I've seen use the mach number even though there is a certain altitude indicated.
: Your statement that all jet powered aircraft use Mach, km/h and mph as speed units and that all' propeller-driven aircraft use just km/h, mph and knotsis unfounded. There are many jet-aircraft which are very subsonic and not mach-limited, while some prop-driven aircraft can get into transonic speeds where mach number is relevant. While the guidance in Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/page content suggests use of Mach number for supersonic aircraft (not Jets or otherwise), it says nothing about the order of them, while mach number cannot usefully be added unless it is sourced - either directly or where a speed is quoted at a specific altitude.Nigel Ish (talk) 17:04, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specifications
Talk:G. Fox & Co.

message: This article needs references. The way it is now, nobody has any way of verifying any of the claims.--Cernansky 16:55, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References Needed 

message: The paragraph which begins "The parking garage was situated ..." doesn't really seem like it belongs in this article. It is supposed to show Mrs. A's influence, but it reads like a coffee discussion of parking garage construction.--Cernansky 16:55, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parking Garage 

message: This section was added this morning. I don't think it fits in well with an article about the chain as a whole. I'm saving it here because perhaps the section of the article on the current use of the flagship building could be expanded using this.--Elipongo (Talk|contribs) 07:21, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current tenants of flagship store 
Talk:John Thornton (philanthropist)

message: I'm hoping to improve this article about one of the leading philanthropists and founders of the Clapham Sect of Christian social reformers of the eighteenth century. Please join me, especially if you are interested in these subjects, or in the 18th century or Georgian England in general. 
The task is not helped by the fact that there are few printed biographies about John Thornton, and most of them are out of print or unavailable. I am intending to be able to provide references and inline citations, as this was one of the main criticisms of this article. Agendum (talk) 14:55, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving this article
Talk:List of aircraft of the Red Army Air Forces

message: “Red army air forces” existed for more than WW2. This page only covers WW2 aircraft.
Suggest changing the title to specify “… during World War Two” 2001:56A:7421:D200:2975:55A9:5EFF:6BCF (talk) 22:21, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change title/move page
Talk:Spontaneous process

message: See Diffusion: The process of diffusion, therefore, minimizes thermodynamic Gibbs free energy (though, it is not a chemical reaction), and is thus a spontaneous process (more familiarly known as a "passive" form of transport, rather than "active"). [emphasis added] I'm not sure how this should be reconciled. Should "spontaneous process" be changed to "spontaneous phenomenon" in the Diffusion entry, or should the Spontaneous Process entry be changed to incorporate diffusion? For now, I am simply going to link the entries. --Nick 09:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, all this statement looks bad: "Since a positive enthalpy means that energy is being released to the surroundings, then the 'isolated' system includes the chemical reaction plus its surroundings." And there is a logic fallacy, 1 doesn't imply 2.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.130.226.99 (talk) 10:29, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diffusion is a spontaneous process that is NOT a chemical reaction 

message: Is it accurate to speak of "releasing" free energy to the surroundings considering that the the delta S term includes energy that is distributed internally (within the system... products and reactants also if the reaction is goes to equilibrium, not to completion).  The delta H term measures energy distributed to surroundings but free energy overall... and hence the question of spontaneity... relates to energy distributed both externally to the surroundings AND internally within the system.  
64.134.222.173 (talk) 20:14, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Releasing" free energy to the surroundings 

message: What is spontaneous opertion theory 222.127.189.158 (talk) 00:15, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/MudkipLuver111

message: I mean, it's blatantly doomed. -Amarkov blahedits 03:20, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good, someone else bothered to close it. Please don't put it on the failed RfA log, it would be pointless. -Amarkov blahedits 03:20, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we really need a bureaucrat to close this? 

message: I thought I deserved ops very much. MudkipLuver111 03:58, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No you didn't think that. You've done nothing. -Amarkov blahedits 04:01, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But but I DO *cries* MudkipLuver111 04:05, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Everyone else thinks otherwise. --210physicq (c) 04:07, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

text: This user has been indefinitely blocked as a troll. Gwernol 04:08, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  But but but
Talk:String (physics)

message: this need immmediate review  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.99.41.42 (talk) 07:27, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The usual in physics is to model things mathematically.  If strings are not themselves mathematical objects, presumably they are modeled by mathematical objects.  I would expect some mathematical definitions.  Thanks if you can help.CountMacula (talk) 19:52, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is the math? 

message: In the final sentence of Closed and open strings:
(...) In certain string theories the lowest-energy vibration of an open string is a tachyon and can undergo tachyon condensation. Other vibrational modes of open strings exhibit the properties of photons and gluons.
Isn't the representation (open or closed) of photons and gluons dependent on the model as well?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.215.5.255 (talk) 20:03, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modes of open strings? 

message: In order to make way for moving Draft:String to article space to take the place as the primary topic, I've posted a proposal at Talk:String#Requested move 16 January 2017 to move the disambiguation page currently at "String" to "String (disambiguation)". Your input would be helpful to establish a common consensus on whether or not this move, or something else, should be done. I look forward to your thoughts on the matter. The Transhumanist 22:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion to move "String" to "String (disambiguation)"
Talk:Einstein Kristiansen

message: Found this article via the Random button & started adding links to it, as well as making grammar/style edits.
This article has basically no biographical information in it at all. This is not surprising, because I couldn't even find this guy's age with the help of Google.
Cannot find anything on "local broadcaster Mediacorp TV12" on WP as such, but added a link to the parent company. Determined from their Web site that they are located in Singapore & replaced the "local" portion.
There's basically no sourcing on this article whatsoever, and it's sorely lacking in dates, but I don't know enough about international TV to edit it with any accuracy, so I just added up links & put it on the stubs list in a couple of topics that might attract people with the knowledge, & added it into some of the obvious categories. 
Myself, I have no idea what an "arts & crafts drama" show for kids looks like and am curious....
--Parcequilfaut 04:08, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Does this deserve to exist?
Talk:Linda Fite

message: Linda Fite eventually did include a character named after her cousin.  In "The Cat" issue #2 (Jan 1973), the imposter posing as Dr. Tumulo's nephew Arthur was revealed to be one of the Owl's henchmen (with the surname Broussard).
Darci 03:24, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Superconducting coherence length

message: The article lists as a note to help the reader understand the second equation a mass twice the electron mass, but there is no actual mass in that equation. I think it should be moved to the GL coherence length equation or otherwise elaborated upon. --1337QuantumMechanic (talk) 07:26, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mass 

message: What is alpha?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by VSohn (talk • contribs) 19:10, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alpha
Talk:Bayajidda

message: Well, he certainly qualifies as royalty, because he was born a prince, married a princess, and then married a queen. But he still stands out, both in name and in content, from a lot of the rest of the royalty and nobility work group articles. Picaroon 03:26, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Bayajidda is the concept of the hausa region Roxxy gold (talk) 08:45, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hausa region
Talk:Fred White (marshal)

message: There was a lot of stuff in this article about White's relationship with the various factions involved in the OK Corral shootout of late 1881, which is folk-history and historically cannot be factual. Actually, White died too early to see much of this. White knew Wyatt Earp as the county undersheriff, and never saw Behan with a badge (Behan replaced Earp in that position a few weeks after White's death). If White ever knew Behan, it was in the last couple of months of White's life, and then as a new barkeep in town, and part owner of a local livery stable. I'd also like to know where all the info on White's supposedly great relationship with the Cowboys in general and Brocius in particular, is from. If no citation is coming, I propose to delete it. So far as I know, history is more or less silent on the matter, although we know that White did indeed testify that he thought the Brocius shooting was accidental. That does not mean the two men were friends. SBHarris 03:28, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Some folklore history deleted
Talk:Superpotential

message: It was noted at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics#Superpotential that this page appears to be a victim of drive-by tagging. It was tagged in 2009. This talk page does not explain what's wrong with it. I propose removing the tag.  
This article is imperfect, but imperfections in WP are not unusual. I skimmed it, the tone of voice, the level - it is written at a novice level, a kind-of intro-to-supersymmetry for people who know only the most basic quantum mechanics and not much more. So that would be a complaint - it feels dumbed-down. Like all things dumbed down, its not terribly clear what it wants to say. Kind of muddy. (For example, it fails to actually demonstrate the invarience). It is missing a good informal introduction. It should not dive into an example, it should say with words, not formulas, what it hopes to accomplish. Motivate the example. So that's missing. I recommend removing the tag, and then just .. waiting till someone motivated comes by to improve it. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 05:40, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Drive by tagging