Template talk:PD-India

message: __FORCETOC__
Further information from the following webpage.
The state government follow the directions and rules laid down by the central government through various acts like RTI act.
http://delhigovt.nic.in/itpolicy.asp
"Simultaneously, the government will also put on the internet information that ought to be in public domain."
Means the information put on the internet by the government is in public domain unless stated as protected by copyright.
"Later this information set will be further expanded and their placement in public domain will be made legally enforceable through the Right to Information Act."
Further information
http://nicsu.up.nic.in/guidelines.pdf
Management of Government of India Websites 
Guidelines for IT Managers 
Version 1.0  
March, 2004 
Developed by 
National Informatics Centre 
Department of Information Technology 
Ministry of Communications & IT 
Government of India 
For Department of Administrative Reforms and Public Grievances (DARPG), Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, Government of India
In cases where the document is in public domain and there is no restriction on its reproduction, the copyright statement could be worded as follows:
“Material featured on this site  may be reproduced free of charge in any format or media without requiring specific permission. This is subject to the material being reproduced accurately and not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context. Where the material is being published or issued to others, the source must be prominently acknowledged. ”
However, the permission to reproduce this material does not extend to any material on this site which is identified as being the copyright of a third party. Authorisation to reproduce such material must be obtained from the copyright holders concerned. “
In cases where the nature of information/document calls for a  restriction on its reproduction, the copyright statement could indicate the following terms  
“Material on this site is subject to copyright protection unless otherwise indicated. The material may be downloaded to file or printer without requiring specific prior permission. Any other proposed use of the material is subject to the approval of ______ . Application for obtaining permission should be made to (email and complete postal address of the concerned department)”
The Departments should also be sensitive towards publishing any information having a third party copyright. The Government departments should follow  proper procedures to obtain the permission, prior to publishing such information on their websites.
Privacy Statement
All departments that solicit or collect personal information from visitors through their websites must incorporate a prominently displayed Privacy Statement which should clearly state the purpose for which the information has been collected and  whether the information shall be disclosed and to whom.
It is hoped that whenever a department’s website collects personal information from its visitors, it is done through sufficiently secure means to avoid any inconvenience. SSL/SSH/Digital Certificates are some of the instruments which could be used to achieve this. A sample Privacy Statement is given  below : 
Privacy Statement
As a general rule, this web site does not collect Personal Information about you when you visit the site. You can generally visit the site without revealing Personal Information, unless you choose to provide such information. Any Personal information collected shall be used only for the stated purpose and shall NOT be shared with any other department/ organization (public/private).
This site may contain links to non-Government sites whose data protection and privacy practices may differ from ours. We are not responsible for the content and privacy practices of these other websites and encourage you to consult the privacy notices of those sites.
Chanakyathegreat 15:31, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm wondering why the PD-India template should make particular mention of photographs and give dates for that, while disregarding other PD material (which have different cut-off dates). The link to the copyright rules website details copyright for all material. IMO, we should remove special mention of photographs and could create a template specific to Indian photographs, if deemed necessary. Any suggestions? ImpuMozhi 01:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia templates are almost always specific to graphic material, as text on Wikipedia is supposed to be original. We are working on templates for other materials, but on other projects: for example, copyright details about text are best kept at Wikisource (where the text copyright problems are...). I hope this answers your question.... Physchim62 (talk) 15:13, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why only photos?

message: For which photos can this template be used.  Specifically, can I use this template to upload the following fotos under this template?
*  - this is a photo of the old Mysore palace which got burnt down and was rebuilt.  This photo should be nearly 100 years old, because I think the old palace burned around 1910 or something.
*  - this is a photo of the new palace with the durbar in session.  My educated guess is that this photo is also atleast 80 years old.  The king looks like Nalvadi Krishnaraja Wodeyar to me.  But then, one of the people on the left also looks to me like Mirza Ismail who was actually the Dewan under Jayachamarajendra Wodeyar.  And then, another person on the same side and closer to the observer seems to be Henry Irwin himself who died in 1922. I could have got all these wrong, though.
Further, what template can I use for this one below,
*  - this is a photograph of the architect taken somewhere in England(i presume) at his daughter's wedding(thats what the website says).
Thanks.  Sarvagnya 02:12, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is the work anonymous? See  for an image I uploaded. It may qualify as PD-anonymous. =Nichalp «Talk»= 13:09, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My guess is that the work is anonymous.  But how are we to verify that it is indeed anonymous?  If the source doesnt 'attribute' the work to anybody, is it safe to assume that the work is anonymous? Sarvagnya 21:17, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Pose this question on Commons talk:Licensing =Nichalp «Talk»=
* Also see  a related discussion and See 'Copyright Rules 1957', for all queries --Ekabhishektalk 06:20, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question  

message: The current wording of the template implies that files that are PD in India but not in the US might be acceptable on Wikipedia but not on Commons. This is wrong: while it is true that Commons insists that it must be PD in both countries, Wikipedia insists that it must be PD in the US. Anything that can't be transferred to Commons under these rules cannot be hosted here on Wikipedia either. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:21, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template is misleading