Template talk:Cfr

message: The error message for not "subst:"ing the template is incorrect. It currently refers to "Cfd" rather than "Cfr". Please edit "" to read "". This is a simple fix, but the template is locked. Thanks.—Chidom talk  22:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. AnonEMouse (squeak) 20:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Subst:" error message 

message: :See: Wikipedia_talk:Categories_for_discussion#Time_to_complete_the_grand_renaming.3F. -- ProveIt (talk) 15:25, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007 January 1 

message: Could someone please change the category on this template from :Category:Wikipedia maintenance templates to the subcategory :Category:Category maintenance templates where other category-related templates are grouped? e.g. , . Thx. Dl2000 16:40, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:59, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Request sub-category change

message: The link to the policy can be updated to :Wikipedia:Categories for Discussion policies for simplicity and to avoid unnecessary redirects, as well as to avoid disconcerting people who may notice that "discussion" links to "deletion". - Fayenatic london (talk) 17:48, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --ais523 17:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Policy link 

message: Reformat the code as follows:
--Yecril (talk) 11:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: 1) Please be more specific about what you want changed, and provide the exact code you want added. 2), how is this any different to what's there already? Happy‑melon 17:10, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improve code formatting 

message: The instruction to add a comment comes before the instruction to add the entry.  This is somewhat misleading for the poster.  
It should be noted that the first part is for others and the second part is for the poster.
--Yecril (talk) 11:04, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The instructions appear in reverse order 

message: Please add this line to the top as the template falls under T3 and is no longer needed for the new process.

Thanks, MrKIA11 (talk) 22:12, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose CSD. See also WT:CFD - jc37 04:45, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've disabled the edit-protected request for speedy deletion as it seems beyond its scope, and there is a distinct lack of consensus. The template is still widely linked from policy pages for example. Please get some consensus. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:17, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Delete 

message: Please participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Deletion discussions#Have all XfD be substituted and link to the actual page of discussion. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:14, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Have all XfD be substituted and link to the actual page of discussion 

message: Could a templatey administrator replace all cases of
subst:
with
safesubst:
and remove

at Template:Cfr? Thanks. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 225° 43' 45" NET 15:02, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: . עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:01, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Code Update 

message: Feel free to participate in the discussion at Template talk:Cfd all#Should the tags for nominating categories to be renamed be purple in stead of pink?. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:27, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the tags for nominating categories to be renamed be purple in stead of pink? 

message: In my latest sandbox version, I made the template more tolerant in regard to a prepended "Category:" namespace in the  parameter. The current technique appends the current (!) namespace as a prefix, which in these cases leads to a duplicated namespace, see for example :Category:Electric power transmission systems in Asia.The Testcases show how the current technique also produces an artifact on non-category namespaces, which however isn't all too relevant, as the template is only expected to be used in the Category namespace. The same testcases however also show that my improved version corrects the overall problem.
PanchoS (talk) 14:31, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Synced. The change looks good. (I wonder if it makes sense to check the namespace of the page, and if we're not on a category, we return a different message. That might potentially happen at ) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 22:12, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 21 May 2016 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Template talk:Cfd which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 00:14, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: OK, so I need help with listing two categories I want to nominate for re-naming. They are :Category:DuMont News & :Category:DuMont Sports. I want to nominate those two for re-naming because the DuMont Television Network never actually had news or sports divisions, even though it did broadcast news & sports programming. Now, I've read the instructions on the template page for how to post the notification for nominating similar categories for re-naming, but I'm not sure I completely understand how to do the notification for two similar categories. If someone could show me the wording that needs to be used for nominating two similar categories, I'd really appreciate it. 76.235.248.101 (talk) 02:15, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  I need help listing two similar categories I want to nominate for re-naming... 

message: The header of a CfD discussion always includes "Category:", but I sometimes forget to put that namespace in the link (especially because the target parameter does not require you to put in the namespace).  I made to the sandbox adds the "Category:" for you if you forget it. ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 10:07, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I personally, make plenty of CfD nominations whose header does not include the word category, such as Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 November 3#Wikipedians interested in webcomics * Pppery * it has begun... 15:36, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, right.. Nevermind then. ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 17:02, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Automatically add "Category:" for discussion link