Talk:Castle Bytham

message: Why is this rated 'stub'?  Just how much information do you need to exit stub-class? 
If you added a paragraph about the castle & every villager's name and adress there would be nothing left to say Brunnian (talk) 05:28, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem with the ratings is that they get out of date, and need someone to spot that there has been a substantial change in the content of an article. The England project assessed it in November 2007, while the Lincolnshire project in March 2009. If you feel that an article needs a reassessment and do not want to do it your self then just drop a note on the assessment page of the relevant project. For example the Lincolnshire assessment page can be found at WP:WikiProject Lincolnshire/Assessment and add an entry in the section "Assessment Requests". Keith D (talk) 15:38, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub?

message: The call for citations is unlikely to be satisfied.  Take, for example, the two for the history of methodism.  I attended the chapel till it closed, and the informally ecumenical services in the Anglican church.  I know this to be true.  But the chance of finding contemporary written evidence is vanishingly small.  Yet no-one from the village has disputed the tale, or come up with another.  This is a weakness of wikipedia--Brunnian (talk) 06:49, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Replaced several cn's with references.  The ones mentioned above are impossible to satisfy.--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 22:37, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Call for citations 

message: Would the lengthy entry about the castle be better in Bytham Castle?  with a 'main article' link and a one-sentence summary?--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 07:45, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Castle 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Castle Bytham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100525094050/http://lincstrust.org.uk/reserves/nr/reserve.php?mapref=102 to http://www.lincstrust.org.uk/reserves/nr/reserve.php?mapref=102
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071111131731/http://www.lincstrust.org.uk/reserves/nr/reserve.php?mapref=57 to http://www.lincstrust.org.uk/reserves/nr/reserve.php?mapref=57
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921053518/http://www.lincoln.anglican.org/search_parishes.php?14017000 to http://www.lincoln.anglican.org/search_parishes.php?14017000
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130620055755/http://homepages.which.net/~rex/bourne/cbytham.htm to http://homepages.which.net/~rex/bourne/cbytham.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100525094050/http://lincstrust.org.uk/reserves/nr/reserve.php?mapref=102 to http://www.lincstrust.org.uk/reserves/nr/reserve.php?mapref=102
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:04, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The maypole image caption refers to the Commonwealth, which is perhaps Commonwealth of England, but that is neither linked nor stated. Maybe a leftover from previous edits? Huwg 220.253.30.198 (talk) 10:41, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commonwealth?