Talk:Mudéjar art

message: Mudejar is an artistic style and the introduction paragraphs is talking mainly about other issues not so relevant which happen centuries later.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.132.194.229 (talk) 10:05, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I slapped this category on because, I thought it was a moorish inspired architecture therefore i assumed a few things. I wanted to cross-link it appropiately. If this is not the right cross-link please suggest to me an appropriate category within which to put it that would allow people looking for the islamic influences on architectural styles to find it. --Tigeroo 07:06, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Category: Islamic architecture

message: I fail to understand why mudéjar is called "vernacular architecture" in the article, as this style was used, says the article, in many buildings, such as cathedrals or palaces, which can hardly be considered "vernacular" if this means that they "use locally available resources to address local needs" and are "in contrast to planned architecture by architects" (see Vernacular architecture). The style may have started as an adaptation of Romanesque to the local needs but if this and the lack of known architects in many of the buildings justify that it be called "vernacular", then so should be Romanesque and Gothic in most cases, not to mention, for instance, pre-columbian architecture.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.49.207.117 (talk) 16:57, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with that. Mudéjar was a style, often mixed with others, used to construct palaces, cathedrals, and humble parishes and houses. And the point about the unknown architect styles convinces me. I would remove the category.--Garcilaso (talk) 12:37, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vernacular architecture?

message: Two different topics. See d:Q15011985. --Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 09:23, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with splitting, there's clearly two different topics here. How to go about it? HaEr48 (talk) 05:19, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: Throughout this article, Mudéjar when used as an adjective – e.g. Mudéjar style – is capitalised.  I don't think this is correct, and it should be lower case. Without intervening dissension, I'll change it in seven days. Unbuttered parsnip (talk) mytime= Fri 11:57, wikitime=  03:57, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalisation 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mudéjar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060517164716/http://www.pliegosdeopinion.net/pdo8/barandal8/ensayo8/mudejar.htm to http://www.pliegosdeopinion.net/pdo8/barandal8/ensayo8/mudejar.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:07, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mudéjar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070313154659/http://www.bragancanet.pt/patrimonio/avelas.htm to http://www.bragancanet.pt/patrimonio/avelas.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:55, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: After the last wave of editions, it is becoming obvious that this page should be split in two: one about the people called Mudejares and one about Mudejar art. The connection between both is probably not so intimate as the common name might suggest. --Jotamar (talk) 16:45, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split needed 

message: As the lead clearly states, the name Mudéjar art was coined in the 19th century, long after the Mudéjar people had vanished. The name for the art style caught on, but that shouldn't deceive us into believing that the authors of the art works were necessarily part of the ethnic group. The authors could have been:
* Mudejars
* Muslims from the remaining Muslim kingdoms in Iberia (or Africa), hired by Christians
* Christians who had lived and worked in Muslim kingdoms (Mozarabs)
* Christians who had contact with Muslims and had learned their techniques
* Anyone who had learned from any of the previous groups, including perhaps even minorities such as the Jews
Having high in this page a History of the Mudejars section just misleads readers into thinking that the art style was exclusive to this ethno-religious group, which is unlikely and in any case as far as I know not documented anywhere. --Jotamar (talk) 20:12, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: With no reply in almost one month, my first idea was to delete the entire section, as argued above, but I'll try to do something less radical. --Jotamar (talk) 22:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mudejar art and Mudejar people