Talk:Super 3D Noah's Ark

message: The gameplay is accessible to younger children. Noah's ark includes secret passages, food, weapons and extra lives. There are secret levels, and shortcut levels as well. The player eventually comes across a slingshot, and flings canteloupe and watermelon at the larger bosslike animals, like Ernie the Elephant, and Carl the Camel.
That's the last paragraph. Seems out of place to me, what do others think?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.153.156.2 (talk) 21:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Paragraph 

message: Not that a Christian game stealing code wouldn't be ironic theft, but isn't it uncalled for to specifically say that the theft is ironic in the article? I'm removing it. --Amanaplanacanalpanama 17:57, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. In addition to being point of view it accuses Wisdom Tree criminal activity without citation.--Zerothis 01:31, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: "This game is the only unlicensed SNES game that has ever been commercially released. id, the people that made Wolfenstein 3D, gave their source code to Wisdom Tree because Nintendo turned down the violence in Wolfenstein 3D for the SNES, meaning id wanted revenge by making an unlicensed game. To play this game, one has to attach another Super Nintendo cartridge to it to bypass the SNES lockout technology; the cartridge itself resembles a Game Genie and has a port on top for a licensed cartridge to lock onto."
This part of the article looks exactly like what the Angry Nintendo Nerd said on that one video of his when he criticized this game. And a comedic video isn't exacly a Wikipedia-standard source, funny as those videos may be. Slartibartfast1992 03:38, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also when he was describing the game, he emphasized that it was a "rumor" before mentioning the story about id Software alleged role making not reliable. Probably too late to mention it because the rumor has been deleted. However never know it might reappear after people out of sudden learn of this game from that video or any other source. --Souphanousinphone 00:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreliable source 

message: Look, I had never heard of this game until the review by the Angry Nintendo Nerd, and all information on this article seems as if it was taken from his review. Never have I even met somebody who knew somebody who played this game, which seems to say how much people know about it. And it should only be slightly listed on an article about the Angry Nintendo Nerd, if it had not been deleted and protected, because (I disagree) they say that the Angry Nintendo Nerd is not notable enough. So, if the "source" you got the whole article from was not notable enough for Wikipedia, then this article probably is not either. Therefore, I come to a conclusion: delete this article. Slartibartfast1992 21:48, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ummm... How 'bout, no?  Strange as it may seem, there are plenty of people who heard of/played this game before Angry Nintendo Nerd ever came around.  This game has a pretty unique history, considering that it is the only unlisenced SNES ever released. 72.69.121.54 13:26, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

text: How about some sources then? Proof that the whole contents of this article are not indeed taken out of the Angry Nintendo Nerd review and that people actually know about this game. Numbers of about how many people know about it would also be adequate. Slartibartfast1992 14:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you provide me with numbers of about how many people know about the Sony PlayStation 3?  Seriously, considering this article was created over 2 years ago while (according to the date on the linked YouTube video, at least) the "Angry Video Game Nerd" didn't make his video until December 2006 -  like 6 months ago.  If you want to rememve any references to the YouTube video, I would suggest reverting to the last pre-AVGN edit, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Super_3D_Noah%27s_Ark&oldid=90387980 72.69.121.54 00:10, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Sorry, didn't get that one word, "rememve" in your third sentence. Will see if a revert should be done to that pre-AVGN edit you mentioned. But about providing numbers about people using the PS3, they should be somewhat higher than people playing this game. Slartibartfast1992 14:57, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow... are you sure "rememve" isn't a real word?  Man, I can't even claim that was a type-o... Not sure what happened there... 72.69.127.101 01:50, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I'll just take it as if you meant remove and will leave it at that (that must have been it, I can't think of any other relevant words). Slartibartfast1992 02:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I meant to say "remove"... :)  72.69.127.101 03:13, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

text: The DOS version of this game can be freely downloaded on the Internet, afaik.  If you want to check the verifiability of anything in this article all you need to do is play the game.  Haplolology 15:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

text: So even if I play it as a DOS version (therefore, computer version) I will know that all you need to do to play it on the super nintendo console is to stick another game cartridge into it? Please explain the logic of this. Besides, I'd be glad to use games as references, but we can't. Slartibartfast1992 15:39, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Took a look at the pre-AVGN edit. It's the same, but without the AVGN review as an external link. It's got everything in the article exactly as is right now: like somebody just took it all out of the AVGN's review. We can't use videos as references. And even if we could, I don't think it would be a very reliable source. Slartibartfast1992 15:43, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I also took a look at the link provided in the "id Software/Wisdom Tree rumor" section of this talk page, and I have to admit that it would be a pretty good reference that makes everything in the article verifiable. Slartibartfast1992 02:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

text: What the fuck, man? First of all, assume good faith. Second, so I was wrong and I feel like a complete asshole about even taking this to AfD, so what? I didn't know and I already feel like an idiot, OK? This was over months ago and I haven't bothered this article since. --Slarti (1992) 01:53, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Enough? 

message: I don't know how it affects anything but the source to Wolf3d is free to download from id's website. It probably wasn't available at the time this was released but this might change some aspects of the game's status...? 78.145.156.7 11:44, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: :Image:Noah's Ark 3D SNES title screen.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 16:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Noah's Ark 3D SNES title screen.png

message: :Image:Noah's Ark 3D SNES gameplay.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 15:51, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Noah's Ark 3D SNES gameplay.png

message: I don't really feel this needs its own article, a lot is already covered in Wisdom Tree and a merge wouldn't really be a bad idea. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 18:51, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree with the merge proposal.  Almost all video games, especially for major systems like the SNES, have their own articles. Interwebs (talk) 14:28, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: ...is just screwed up, and should be deleted now.
"Noah only had two of each animal on his ark, one male and one female, but the game shows only 9 animals, there are many of each, and they all look exactly the same." Too much info, too much 'only.'  "Now some might say that this is a limitation of the technology," Sounds too 'non-wikipedia' like. "and it would not be possible to fit artwork for 9,000 species of animal into a single SNES ROM," Cartridge, not ROM. "but those people are heretics." Ummm... Okay? "Noah's story proves that God can make any unrealistic number of things fit into any limited space regardless of the level of man's technology." I can't tell if he is religious or mocking religious people. Furthermore, there are no sources to back him up. Last, although unrelated, is it just me, or does it say is was distributed by id software?--Retrotails (talk) 01:43, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The entire "Historical Errors" section 

message: I quote from the active: "The level layouts, weapons, and enemy behaviors in the SNES version are identical to Wolfenstein 3D, but the graphics were changed to reflect a non-violent theme."
:
This whole sentence is evidently wrong. Here are some incontrovertible evidence: 
:- Super 3D Noah’s Ark contains more weapons than Wolfenstein 3D
:- The game features visible bullets, witch interact with the surrounding (the watermelon). Weapons with visible bullets are not featured in Wolfenstein 3D
:- The game features Bible questions. When you solve them you gain bonus, health and Ammo. Such a feature is not included in Wolfenstein 3D
:- The levels are all totally new and are now similar the those of Wolfenstein 3D. In one level you just stab in the letters “n o a h”.
:
:Alls those facts, are verified on this website:
: http://boojakascha.ch/index.php?page=super3dnoahsark
:I would highly recommend including it as a reference even if it is German. Because the proof of the facts are in the pictures, which are so clear that they don’t need any explanation.
: 213.196.139.251 (talk) 09:56, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graphics Swap