Talk:Justin Baldoni

message: Marked with POV tag. Article has a partiality towards subject instead of a neutral fact-based write-up about a living person. POV found throughout the article. Xadnder (talk) 07:22, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Reverted back to version that had sourcing. Removed most of the unsourced POV stuff. --‖ Ebyabe talk - State of the Union ‖ 07:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: The elaborately staged proposal video of Baldoni proposing to his wife has racked up over 11 million video hits. For a proposal video, its pretty impressive (if a little long, at 25 minutes). Its been written up on Eonline and the NYPost, as well as a slew of others. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 05:40, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal Youtube video 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Justin Baldoni. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061115150812/http://www.northernexpress.com/editorial/features.asp?id=1412 to http://www.northernexpress.com/editorial/features.asp?id=1412
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061011185927/http://www.mailtribune.com/archive/2004/0905/life/stories/03life.htm to http://www.mailtribune.com/archive/2004/0905/life/stories/03life.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101116030629/http://www.dbiff.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3&Itemid=2 to http://dbiff.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3&Itemid=2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:20, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: As seen here and here, Cookyboard has insisted that we should mention that Baldoni has a birthmark in his left eye because it's "notable and unusual personal information," while I have insisted that we should not include it because it's trivia/WP:DIARY material. Thoughts? I'll alert WP:BIOGRAPHY to this matter. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:01, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: (Summoned by the WP:BIOGRAPHY alert) Twitter is not a reliable source. If the birthmark was discussed in a reliable source then there might be an argument for mentioning it. Otherwise not. --Deskford (talk) 23:15, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Deskford, I didn't bring up the sourcing because official Twitter accounts have been used as acceptable WP:Primary sources on Wikipedia before. It's a WP:About self matter. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:17, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: My next question then would be: is this birthmark an important defining influence on his work, or on the way others perceive his work? I know nothing about the subject, but from the Twitter interaction it looks to me like something that was brought up in a casual remark, and he brushed it off as insignificant. So still I say it is not worthy of mention. --Deskford (talk) 00:31, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthmark in his left eye 

message: I love you and want to kiss you pls get back to me 71.174.215.151 (talk) 00:57, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pearl my name