Talk:Hachette Book Group

message: Hi. I just wanted to let everyone know that I made several significant changes to this article. It still needs a lot of work, though. Many of the imprints have no separate articles (and probably don't need one), but their section in this article should be expanded. At the very least, each sub-imprint (an imprint of an imprint) should have a one-liner of information mentioning the focus or genre published. The major imprints should have more detailed information added. I don't know much about this publisher, so I mostly relied upon (and incorporated) information from the related (often poorly sourced) articles elsewhere on Wikipedia. I did cross-reference to HBG, TWELVE, and Springboard's websites to confirm some details, but there should be more sourcing and fact-finding done to get this article up to B-class.
Please be careful if you change the names of sections. I have pointed many redirects to the History section and other specific sections within this article. I have also bolded the first occurrence of each imprint name within the History section to make it easier for people redirected in that manner to locate the name they clicked that sent them to this article. If you rename sections, please be sure to update all the associated redirects, too. I also made it easy for someone to split a section off to a dedicated article if they find enough information to do so. Just convert the appropriate redirect into an article, and then point from here to there. Easy-peasy. :-) Have fun! --Willscrlt (Talk) 01:59, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the current imprint from a section with many empty sub-sections to a single section with a bulleted list of imprints and sub-imprints.  Empty headings aren't really appropriate and don't really help the reader; by redirecting to a section there's a tiny, tiny bit more reading, but it's in keeping with the MOS.  WLU (talk) 13:24, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reorganization/Revision

message: Hello. I created a separate section for the authors to make it cleaner.  But, since a publisher doesn't publish ALL of an author's titles, I think it would be good to have a listing of titles attached to the author names. [User:AnjouRd|AnjouRd]]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by AnjouRd (talk • contribs) 21:30, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Authors

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Hachette Book Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110714183334/http://www.ninamunk.com/documents/PowerFailure.htm to http://www.ninamunk.com/documents/PowerFailure.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130106082627/http://www.hachettebookgroup.com/publishers/ to http://www.hachettebookgroup.com/publishers/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130106082627/http://www.hachettebookgroup.com/publishers/ to http://www.hachettebookgroup.com/publishers/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:45, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Footnote 3 "Who are the Big Six?" is defunct, the archive URL for this link would be:
http://web.archive.org/web/20110101140836/http://www.fictionmatters.com/2010/03/05/who-are-%E2%80%9Cthe-big-six%E2%80%9D/
Sorry I don't have the time to learn the arcane embed codes to fix this myself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.44.21.18 (talk) 19:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expired Link 

message: Why is there no mention of them? 71.241.132.150 (talk) 01:12, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of the Yen Press imprint