lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Channel 21 (German TV network)

message: ich kann nur sagen Achtung ausser vielen dummen Sprüchen können die nicht viel
ich wurde von denen ganz schön abgezockt 
habe etwas gekauft angeblich ohne sonstige Kosten schon der Versand war damals teuer eine Lieferung als Brief hätte es auch getan von wegen eine Bestellung am Tag nur einmal Versandkosten ich zahlte doppelt
deshalb ACHTUNG Augen auf beim Kauf
manche Artikel gibt es beim Discounter viel viel billiger als bei denen HighCloss Produkte zum Beispiel
als wie gesagt glaub denen nicht alles 
El Cid  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.187.212.160 (talk) 15:38, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Channel 21 ehemals RTL-Shop 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Breaking Laces

message: Ok, so Im curious when as a band we can have a wikipedia page.  As far as the rules I can see, to be "notable" we must have met "1" of a list of "notable" criteria, and we have met 5 so far:
1) Has had a charted hit on any national music chart.
Because you have a hard time obtaining the CMJ charts from a year ago and three years ago doesn't mean we don't fit the criteria.  We charted the CMJ Top 200 National charts twice.  Its a fact.
2) Has gone on an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country, reported in reliable sources.
We toured the UK in October 2005 and are now booking a second UK tour for Newyears/january of 2008.  The folks at CMEAS.com organized the tour and can forward you reliable sources that reported the tour.
3) Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable; note that it is often most appropriate to use redirects in place of articles on side projects, early bands and such.
 
Drummer Seth Masarsky toured as a member of Melissa Ferrick's band.  If she is not notable, then maybe you should remove her wiki as well.
4) Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g. a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a compilation album, etc...
We just landed a spot on the soundtrack for a new documentary coming out titled "Waiting For Hockney".  It may not be a major release, but will hit the indie film circuit.  The song they are using is "This World" off of our album Lemonade.
5) Has been placed in rotation nationally by any major radio network.
We have been in regular rotation on XMU (XM Channel 43) since 2003.  Tobi, who runs the station, has given us the distinct pleasure of being the only band ever to come in and record a second live set there.  Our first live set, and also songs from all our albums, have been played heavily on XMU since 2003.  You can contact Tobi directly at XMU to get confirmation of this.
So please tell me, what other criteria must we fit to be included in Wikipedia.  Wikipedia's rules say we must have met at least one of the criteria.  We fit 5.  Should we get 5 more?
Let me know when it's ok to rewrite what you deleted.
Darbyrob 08:47, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  why?
Talk:.35 Remington

message: The .30-30 looks very short on the image! Its case length is 51,8 mm (>2"), the same as the .243 Win.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.82.186.55 (talk) 06:55, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 30-30 picture

message: Can an owner of a 35 Remington cartridges take picture(s) of the various types of ammo available. In a side by side labeled imaged. The Hornady a rubber-tipped spitzer bullet   version for lever action riles, would greatly benefit for an example. Since lever action rifles owners are taught to avoid anything with a point for fear of causing primer strikes in the tubular magazine underneath the barrel.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CE27:DC90:7D35:B17:7A59:73D2 (talk) 05:52, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: 35 Remington images
Talk:Westminster Academy (Florida)

message: I've added some info and corrected the date of founding (1971 according to the wacad.edu site). There was already a Westminster Academy page at Westminster Academy(Fort Lauderdale, FL) but user Tim Long created this one here which seems ok at the moment as there is only one WA in Florida. Anyone who has more info please feel free to add, but remember it must be verifiable and should not be commentary unless there is an outside source to cite (local newspaper, local newstation, etc). --BHC 08:56, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of schools in Tamworth

message: I have removed the primary sources tag as I feel the sources provided are adequate for Wikipedia and comply with the relevant  policy on use of primary sources.
The sections of the article that rely on the primary sources:
# only make descriptive claims, the accuracy of which is easily verifiable by any reasonable, educated person without specialist knowledge, 
# make no analytic, synthetic, interpretive, explanatory, or evaluative claims.
The references used to verify enrolment and foundation dates are surely descriptive, and not analytic or evaluative in nature and therefore use of primary sources is allowable, especially given it is likely to be the best and possibly only source for this information. -- Mattinbgn\ talk 23:25, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Primary sources
Talk:Sex and Shopping

message: I did a little tweaking of the article' lead and added some external links.  Need to find more sources and add content - if we keep!  – Dreadstar † 09:15, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources and content

message: I think this article is mixing up two series - one from 1998-99 on Five and another from 2005 on C4. The latter was concerned with porn (not prostitution) and is fairly well documented because of the controversy it led to; I'm not so sure about the former.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Billwilson5060 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  serious confusion
Talk:Beatrice Foods

message: * I think that the line ".. during the leveraged buyout raids of the 1980s" should be removed and "sold off" be changed to "sold". It's enough to say when something was sold or bought. This is probably in line with some of the suggestion under :Category:Wikipedia style guidelines. -- 09:08, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improve this article 

message: I think this needs to be shortened. Daniel Christensen (talk) 18:23, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: List mostly of redlinks

message: The Menorquina history page informs me that Beatrice Foods had taken a stake in the Menoquina company back in 1965, is this true? FineFare  —Preceding undated comment added 16:50, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Menorquina
Talk:Batterstown

message: Article needs a lot of sources and content if it's going to stay.  I'll work on it tomorrow...  – Dreadstar † 09:41, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Content and sources
Template talk:Pokémon directory

message: I suggest this template to be updated, with the addition of Generation V, something like this:
<noinclude>
:When a list is created, then it will be on the template. A template links together pages of a similar type. It isn't an information tool. Blake (Talk·Edits) 14:47, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update request 

message: Since all the pages on specific Pokemon are now being merged into the Lists, what should we do about all the individual ones? They're all becoming redirects, so is it worth keeping them? Supernerd11 :D Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 01:12, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, we may as well just redirect them ourselves to get the job done. It's not an easy job to put those Pokè-weeaboos in their place, but it'll teach them a lesson: You can't slime up a serious website for adults with your kiddie cruft. Tezero (talk) 01:44, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individual species 

message: Is it worth putting up an article for the Ultra Beasts? I think they deserve an article due to their uniqueness.... Visokor (talk) 16:39, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, that's irrelevant. "Does it meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability?" is the only question you should be considering. --The1337gamer (talk) 10:52, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ultra Beasts article?
Talk:Carrier lifetime

message: What kinds of characterization techniques can be used to measure carrier lifetime in the laboratory? Can Capacitance-Voltage Profiling give you carrier lifetime?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.183.20.100 (talk) 01:09, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characterization 

message: In the only equation: what is N and what is the index n? LarsWinterfeld (talk) 15:15, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Equation
Talk:Battle of Ümera

message: Even for someone familliar with the general historical background to these events the narrative details of this particular battle are unclear, not to say confused.  Does the term 'Livs', as used here, refer to the Livonian tribe or to the Livonian Order(ger:Schwertbrüder; eng: Brothers of the Sword)? Ditto with regard to the term Latgals. It would be useful if the article could be rewritten or expanded.86.158.95.91 (talk) 12:48, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Narrative needs reworking
Category talk:Former Roman Catholics

message: * :Category:Former Roman Catholics to :Category:Former Catholics – C2D: List of former Catholics. PPEMES (talk) 12:44, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  While I see your point, you might as well argue the other way around per WP:NOTFINISHED. Ergo: If you want to make a more complete category tree, feel free, but until then, shouldn't the more generic implications prevail? PPEMES (talk) 11:22, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

text: * Oppose per  and rejected Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 February 6#Category:Catholics. Place Clichy (talk) 13:37, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

text: *Oppose this has been discused at legnth before. As per Fayenatic london's opinion above I would not be opposed to a new parent category being created to include Eastern Catholics, but subjects who have left that faith appear to be much less numerous so this is not a pressing issue. Inter&anthro (talk) 16:15, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy renaming discussion
Talk:Pennant of the president of the Republic of Poland

message: the term "jack" is totally inappropriate, as this flag is a typical presidential standard, for maritime and terrestrial use--93.104.34.162 (talk) 20:36, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It's called proporzec in Polish, which is equivalent to the English "jack". The Polish word for a standard is sztandar. You may be right that the terminology is incorrect, but this is the official use and we can't change that. "Union Jack" is also incorrect and we're not going to change that either. — Kpalion(talk) 10:43, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  st andard, not jack! 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks 20:46, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Pennant of the President of the Republic of Poland →  – This would bring this page into compliance with both MOS:CAPS and MOS:JOBTITLES. This would also be consistent with other presidential flag article titles:
*Flag of the president of the United States
*Flag of the president of Ukraine
*Flag of the president of the Philippines
*Flag of the president of Belarus
*Flag of the president of Azerbaijan
*Flag of the president of Colombia -- Woko Sapien (talk) 13:49, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 June 2023
Talk:Braughing

message: How do you pronounce this? Braffing? 10:39, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's correct. I've added an IPA pronunciation to the article. --Nicknack009 12:18, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Camelot (board game)

message: "Because of its former popularity, reasonably-priced vintage copies remain easily available, on eBay and elsewhere."
At latest check from between $85 to $165.71.112.38.38 (talk)
: I changed this to just "easily available". Ihardlythinkso (talk) 14:26, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Reasonably Priced

message: I really think these rules in their entirety should be as external link to the WCF site, rather than be listed here in their entirety.  (Argument: they are really intended for play conduct thru the WCF tournaments, so, anyone participating will obviously be going to the site, etc.) The complete Tournament Rules posted in the WP article is I think WP:UNDUE weight, and in fact that is why I shrunk them (to lessen the "load" so official match rules do not predominate the article).  But the small font is really hard to read and not acc. WP policy, that is why I think the official rules should remain on the WCF site w/ ext link access.  (Just IMO. But really I kind of like the "shrunken" rules too – the reduced size corrects their "weight" given to article, they look pretty cool, and it's more convenient than linking externally, for those interested.  But in the end it might be a "turn-off" to have the complete match rules – they are extensive & essentially technical specifications – in the article.) What do others think? Ok, Ihardlythinkso (talk) 14:43, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: self-reverted (just too small to read!). But still feel may be counterproductive to include complete official rules here; though, they do convey complete piece move specifications. Ok, Ihardlythinkso (talk) 08:11, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shrunken official rules
Talk:The Green Man (film)

message: If Hawkins is the assassin, why isn't he listed in the cast, and who is Hastings? SalineBrain (talk) 07:35, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hawkins is the correct name. Fixed. Blurryman (talk) 19:21, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assassin who?
Talk:Geology of solar terrestrial planets

message: the following page is currently under MASSIVE CONSTRUCTION. please discuss before making any changes. Thanks, Sushant gupta 10:43, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article under massive construction 

message: Good work to this article. Everything is well referenced, broad, factually accurate, neutral. This article certainly taught me a lot about space. Pass. Mitchcontribs 13:02, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Review 

message: This article is much better than Planetary geology. However, it seems that the planetary geology article is about the field, while this article describes the facts. Should Planetary Geology be merged into this article and become a redirect? At very least, think a wikilink between the two should be in order. Awickert (talk) 04:49, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planetary Geology → Merge? 
Talk:St Mary's Church, Acton

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#:: 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#:: 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#:: 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#It is stable.
#:No edit wars etc.: 
#:: 
#It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
#:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass/Fail: 
#:: </div>
**Thanks for your helpful comments.  My responses are below: Peter I. Vardy (talk) 18:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've created a commons gallery for Acton including some pictures of the church and churchyard features: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Acton%2C_Cheshire  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Espresso Addict (talk • contribs) 23:04, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for replacing the (poor) image in the infobox and for the other images.  I have moved the Anglican Portal box, mainly because it was messing up the "edit" links. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 18:15, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It works better there. I'm glad you think my photos are an improvement. They're by no means my best; I've been there with a camera three times now, and somehow the light/weather is always wrong for photos! Espresso Addict (talk) 18:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons gallery
Talk:Tanya Levin

message: I have changed the description of Tanya's book to non fiction as it was is clearly based on her time at Hillsong and her interpretation of its theology and practice . This is a different issue as to whether the book is an accurate description of her time as a Hillsong member . However it is clearly a non fiction book - its not fictional - that impies that the book is not based on real events - Smithus
I decided that the term "non-fiction book" didn't really suit it either - not very good encyclopedic terminology. I decided to instead describe it as "an exposé of the Hillsong Church". Hope that's okay - Tom
Quote from an earlier version: The family turned up in the early days of what was to become the behemoth of Hillsong. Hillsong has been under much controversy.
---> "behemoth" suggests negativity/bias- so I've removed this word.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.234.4.76 (talk) 17:34, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-fiction
Talk:HMS St George (1785)

message: The description of the final voyage and loss of St. George has been partly translated from the Danish Wiki-page :da:HMS St. George (1785) and cross-referenced against various sources, most notably Jepsen (1993). The event is closely coupled to the loss of HMS Defence, HMS Hero and very close escape HMS Cressy and parts of these stories have been included as well. It may be better, however, to create a separate page dedicated to the loss of St. George and Defence and transfer all material there. A large number of merchant ships were also lost in the hurricane.
JakobT (talk) 20:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Talk:MV Savarona

message: Despite Savarona's old website still being active, she is not available for charter. Prior to entering State Service once again in 2014 MV Savarona underwent a modernization which included installation of classified military navigation and Identification Friend or Foe systems. She hence is unable to be chartered for private use.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.32.224.218 (talk) 23:01, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: She is available for charter

message: How many propellers does the yacht have? Also, this article really needs a photo. --98.232.178.38 (talk) 22:41, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo, propellers, etc.

message: The claim that the Savarona was the largest yacht in the world when built is factually incorrect. In actuality, the Mahroussa held that title until 1984 when the Prince Abdulaziz was built.--99.141.178.57 (talk) 20:23, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: not largest yacht when built
Talk:Mill Avenue bridges

message: I've expanded a bit on the history of the old bridge, including a mention of the unbridged crossing that was in use before the new bridge opened.  Cactus Wren 11:33, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: There were actually several phases of traffic routing on the old bridge. Originally, vehicles were narrow enough that there were two lanes in each direction and the seams in the concrete reflect that intent. That pattern continued into the 70's. As Semi-trucks got bigger, they tended to prefer the "left" lane rather than the curb lane. One event changed everything. Two semis in the opposing left lanes passed so close together that the long-armed rear view mirrors on the drivers doors smacked each other. One driver was blinded by the shattered glass.
That event motivated three things:
The bridge became one lane each way until a separate northbound route could be made.
Plans were advanced to have an additional bridge. 
In the meantime, two northbound lanes were paved across the dry river bottom.  
174.19.161.226 (talk) 18:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Traffic Patterns
Talk:Soferet (film)

message: It needs references. This is a film about a living person, after all. Simply saying it's a plot summary won't cut it. Daniel Case 15:38, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is implicitly referenced to the documentary. I don't see a problem here. Kamryn · Talk 20:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary section
Talk:Katrin Wagner-Augustin

message: The article's sole reference is "Webseite von Katrina Wagner-Augustin" with no hyperlink and it is cited in German which it should not in English Wikipedia, even if the "source" is in German.
English language words are widely used on non-English sites for web related terms, e.g."home" and "news" (which is a Good Thing, not as it spreads English but because it helps to internationalise us).  Even the French who must be different and call a computer "un ordinateur" have not deGaullicly banned "Website" but some German references use the mongrel "Webseite" where Web is Eng and Seite is Ger for "pages" not "site" = "place". --SilasW 11:42, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What language? 

message: Shouldn't the lady's dimensions be given in the metric system as her competitions are?--SilasW (talk) 18:55, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dimensions 
Talk:Kite aerial photography

message: I removed the lovely photo of San-Francisco because the caption on the photo indicates that it was taken from a dirigible, not a kite.  So we need some more examples of photos taken from kites.  It would also be good to have some photos of kite cameras and stabilizing mechanisms.  Regards, Ben Aveling 09:53, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have replaced this image as it was taken from a kite (click on the image for details). I agree that some extra photos would help the article. Beechhouse (talk) 15:49, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to text in the image, it was taken "From Lawrence Captive Airship".  I've updated the wikipedia commons page.  Sorry, Ben Aveling 11:34, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Lawrence Captive Airship was the name given by Lawrence to the large camera and balancing device used to take the photos. Probably the best background on the image can be found at:
* American Heritage Detail on the image itself
* 2006 re-shoot by kite by Scott Haefner
* 2006 re-shoot by helicopter using a replica of Lawrence's camera  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beechhouse (talk • contribs) 09:27, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 

message: The last sentence saying that "attempts to commercialise KAP have so far been largely unsuccessful" sort of asks for a reference.  While probably true, I know of two local businesses (and I haven't been searching much) offering "aerial imagery of any place" and list KAP among their other methods (paraglider, helicopter, airplane, etc.) (Balrog-kun (talk) 22:53, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercial use 

message: im sorry this is just so funny, like a kit with a camera? I know it's much cheaper than a drone, but it just so funny
i love the demo image lmao Taffy boeing b 17 (talk) 17:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  kite aerial photography
Talk:National Highway 209 (India)(old numbering)

message: This article is very misleading. It only discusses a small stretch (some 30-50km) of NH209 near Bangalore. NH209 goes all the way upto Coimbatore and passes through some very beautiful forests and an elephant reserve too. See http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/nh209/ for photos of the highway.
::Hope the current cleanup helps. Docku (talk) 15:36, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled