lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Taras Kompanichenko

message: Is error in category on down line, he was born in 1969, not 1977  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.68.168.77 (talk) 01:21, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  births 1969, not 1977 

message: Now in 112-та окрема бригада територіальної оборони (Україна) Завжди Україна буде! Тарас Компаніченко, один з кращих бандуристів країни в ТерОбороні. KKE --31.178.95.17 (talk) 01:22, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  soldier'2022
Talk:Niagara (palace steamer)

message: I've uploaded three images of the Niagara.
*:File:Niagara palace steamer 1.gif
*:File:Niagara palace steamer 2.jpg
*:File:Niagara interior.jpg
I got two of them from www.wisconsinshipwrecks.org. That site seems a good source for info as well. I put the second pic in the NRHP infobox. Someone else can add the others (or not) as he sees fit. -Freekee (talk) 06:16, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  images 

message: The History and Archeology of the Great Lakes Steamboat Niagara, is an article reference from the magazine, Wisconsin Historical Society, where it gives vital information on the night of the fire. This article gives a description of how the steamboat Niagara was navigated in the late 19th century. The article gives the net worth ($95,000) from all of the parts (boiler, hull, fixtures, etc.) of the steamship Niagara.  (Evan96779 (talk) 10:20, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other References
Talk:I Know (Jay-Z song)

message: i think jay is in it as an extra during the park smoking scenes , you see him pop in the scene at 1:43 and then once again in the video 
-dave  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.166.80.87 (talk) 23:22, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Birmingham Science Park Aston

message: Owskiedoodle, thank you for your contribution to this page at 11:08, 14 April 2015‎. However there is a problem with some of the inline citations that you have provided. You new text includes the following sentence and supporting citations:
There are at least seven LAUNCH  events per year, with speakers drawn from the most high profile gaming companies in the UK, such as Codemasters, Microsoft, Playground Games, Rebellion and Vodafone Games.
The problem is that some of the citations do not "clearly support the material as presented in the article" (see WP:PROVEIT):
*For example what part of the content of that sentence does the Vodafone citation support?
*Which of the inline citations you have given supports "There are at least seven LAUNCH events per year" the citation "LAUNCH Presents: Marmalade hosted by bluegfx" does not mention that there are "at least seven LAUNCH events per year".
*"with speakers drawn from the most high profile gaming companies in the UK" says who (which of the citations support it)?
*Who says that the companies mentioned are "high profile gaming companies in the UK" (which of the citations support it)?
*Who says that these companies attend LAUNCH (which of the citations support it)?
-- PBS (talk) 17:01, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed those citations and copy-edited the section to remove hyperbole and promotional language. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:54, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations that do not "clearly support the material as presented in the article" 
Talk:Kunsthaus Zürich

message: Until now, the style which this article was written in, may have caused miss-understandings. Nevertheless, this stub - definitely not more - provides information on one of the more important art museums in Europe. I have fixed some details, and I remove the ad-tag. That's definitely not enough, so please expand this text. --rpd (talk) 22:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is currently a controversy involved with the desire to expand the museum by disturbing the nearby graves.  Is this something that can be expanded upon? Saxophonemn (talk) 09:47, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Museum Expansion 
Talk:Athletics at the 1908 Summer Olympics – Men's 400 metres

message: The circumference of the track is stated as 536m, this means that the word record holder is going through the 400m mark at 36.69s !!
Seemingly very unlikely !!!
Fact checker needed now !!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.12.122.150 (talk) 06:59, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gao Xiqing

message: He is no longer CIO of China's Investment Corporation after what was likely a political move(the state council was involved).
Reference: http://english.caixin.com/2014-01-21/100631567.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.255.48.55 (talk) 00:00, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed his employment positon.
Talk:Athletics at the 1908 Summer Olympics – Men's freestyle javelin throw

message: What is the meaning of "freestyle javelin"? Tad Lincoln (talk) 04:57, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: A standard Javelin throw#Rules and competitions is fairly strictly regulated in terms of how you can throw it.  Presumably, "freestyle" meant that those restrictions did not apply in that event. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 12:00, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation
Talk:Athletics at the 1908 Summer Olympics – Men's 110 metres hurdles

message: The new highlight film just released before the 2012 Olympics shows a clip of the high hurdles at the 40 second mark.  It clearly shows 5 people in the race, even though the heat documentation shows no heats with more than 4 people.  Obviously at this point there are no officials we can question about this.  It just goes to prove that all our written documentation may not be perfect. Trackinfo (talk) 03:15, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Five hurdlers
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/ComputerGuy890100

message: User:ComputerGuy890100
    run at Sat Jan 12 21:15:10 2008 GMT
Category:              5
Image:                 32
Mainspace              249
Portal:                1
Talk:                  4
Template:              31
User talk:             10
User:                  138
Wikipedia talk:        1
Wikipedia:             29
avg edits per page     2.39
earliest               03:24, 14 November 2007
number of unique pages 209
total                  500
2007/11  111
2007/12  248
2008/1   141
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes
edits without an edit summary)
                    Mainspace
17 Lakewood Crossing
14 Lakewood School District (Washington)
7  North Lakewood, Washington
6  Washington State Route 531
6  Sno-Isle Regional Library System
6  Speed limits in Washington
5  Lakewood Middle School (Washington)
5  English Crossing Elementary
5  Cougar Creek Elementary
5  Lakewood High School (Washington)
4  The Land of Elyon
4  Lakewood Elementary
4  The Dark Hills Divide
4  Petco
4  Future of Flight Aviation Center & Boeing Tour
             Category:
2 Wikipedians interested in the Sims
2 Lakewood School District
         Image:
3 LMX logo.png
2 FredMeyerStarbucks.PNG
2 OldNewWorld.png
2 OldNewWorldLabeled.png
2 SimTrains.png
           Template:
7 North Lakewood, WA
6 Lakewood Schools
6 Shopping Centers WA
3 Snohomish County, Washington
3 3dwa 9
2 Olympic Games
2 The Land of Elyon
               User:
74 ComputerGuy890100
13 ComputerGuy890100/Userboxes
13 ComputerGuy890100/Biography
7  ComputerGuy890100/Wikistatus
5  ComputerGuy890100/Ads
3  ComputerGuy890100/Membership
3  ComputerGuy890100/SimCity
2  ComputerGuy890100/Userboxes/2007
2  Computerguy890100/Books
2  ComputerGuy890100/Enviornment
2  ComputerGuy890100/to do
2  ComputerGuy890100/Books
2  ComputerGuy890100/Books/1
     User talk:
5 ComputerGuy890100
                              Wikipedia:
5 Requests for adminship/ComputerGuy890100
4 Editor review/ComputerGuy890100
3 WikiProject Tamagotchi
3 WikiProject Tamagotchi/Userbox
2 Wikipedia Signpost/Tools/Spamlist
2 WikiProject U.S. Roads/Participants
2 Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Tamagotchi articles by quality statistics
If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at User talk:Interiot
.
Based directly on these URLs: [1]
* The edit count was retrieved from this link at 21:15, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for ComputerGuy890100
Talk:Athletics at the 1988 Summer Olympics – Women's 100 metres hurdles

message: Hi, I was adding some content to the semi final section & I think I may have inadvertently removed the very right hand columns where the Notes appear for whether an athlete qualifies for the next round, & I do not know how to repair it. Are you able to reinstate please? Thank you. I apologise for the inconvenience. 120.16.155.18 (talk) 16:26, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amendment
Talk:Athletics at the 1988 Summer Olympics – Men's 100 metres

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB/talk 23:58, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The article picks Ben Johnson as a cheater, but it also mentions that there were more cheaters. IMO the article should expand on that controversy, because while I am not going to defend Ben, I think it is massively one-sided how the article is worded right now. It also is at odds with other entries about athletes who were caught cheating too, not just in that race, but in general. In the long run I recommend for the article to be a bit more objective, focusing on facts - it is fine to make it an assessment of THAT time, but if 6 more were cheaters but only 1 or 2 are mentioned, then the article suggest an incorrect picture. Right now it says mostly that only Ben was a cheat, and this is simply factually NOT correct. It also explains why the fourth placed guy (or third placed, after Ben was DQed) said that he should be the winner. It already implies here that he knows that the two guys before him CHEATEd - and he is right. 2A02:8388:1641:8380:1535:595B:9280:DF61 (talk) 16:48, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cheating
Talk:Athletics at the 1964 Summer Olympics – Men's 4 × 100 metres relay

message: Hey, I've noticed here it says Bob Hayes ran a 8.60s anchor leg, the fastest of all time. It has 2 decimal points, which suggest FAT timing. But in the article on 4x100m relays in general, it says Usain Bolt's 8.65 is the fastest, with Bob Hayes getting a 8.7 hand time, and goes on to suggest it was closer to 8.9. So the page here asserts that Bob Hayes ran 8.60, the 4x100m page says that he had a hand timed 8.7, which was probably closer to 8.9. So what's with the inconsistency here? Kika.txt (talk) 09:33, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bob Hayes inconsistency
Talk:Athletics at the 1964 Summer Olympics – Men's marathon

message: The article reports Robson's time in the 64 Olympic marathon as 2:17.  This time is reported from Robson's own words as reported in source 1
Ellina Mhlanga, 'Former Olympian gets second chance', The Herald (Harare), 4 March 2011
However, the Official Olympic report at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athletics_at_the_1964_Summer_Olympics_%E2%80%93_Men%27s_marathon
reports that Robson ran 2:49:30 in this race.
By  the way, Mathias Kanda, the other Zimbabwean/Rhodesian in the race that day also reports a much faster time than the one he is credited as having.
(see "The Bulawayo Chronicle (Supplement), April 7 2001").  It is possible they were not told their actual times that day.
60.229.250.221 (talk) 07:12, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time in 64 Olympic marathon
Talk:Athletics at the 1964 Summer Olympics – Men's long jump

message: The Official Report (SportsReference either) says, the event was held on October 18th (not 14th). Article corrected. --OlympicLegends (talk) 22:56, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of the event 

message: There was only one tied ranking (22). Alsop (GBR) and Shinnick (USA) made 7.26 m at the first attempt, then they failed two times. All the other (i.e. 2 and 3, 10 to 12) were not tied. The best secont attempt was the crucial point. List correctet and the missing US-athlete Phillip Shinnick filled in. --OlympicLegends (talk) 23:45, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tied ranking
Talk:Cyclophoridae

message: I wanted to add a copy of this info here as I do not have the time to integrate it into the article now.
The following info is about the cyclophorid genera Ditropis, Ditropopsis, and two other somewhat similar genus names, one from the same family, and one from the family Assimineidae.
: According to Nomenclator Zoologicus, both names are recognized : 
:*Ditropis Blanford 1869 	J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, 38, 126.
:*Ditropopsis  Smith 1897  Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., (6) 20, 416. (see: Discover Life)
:Based on the root "Ditropis", there is also :
:* Afroditropis Bequaert & Clench 1936  	Rev. Zool. Bot. afr., 29, 102. (The genus Afroditropis is reviewed on the basis of type material of all the species, of which there are only three, viz two in the Central/West African forest belt and one on Sao Tome.)
:* Ditropisena  Iredale 1933 	Rec. Australian Mus., 19, 57. (family: Assimineidae) ( Online Zoological Collections of Australian Museums)
:I hope this helps a bit.  JoJan (talk) 15:11, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: A note
Talk:Athletics at the 1956 Summer Olympics – Men's hammer throw

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB/talk 17:47, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Athletics at the 1956 Summer Olympics – Men's pole vault

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB/talk 17:45, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Athletics at the 1956 Summer Olympics – Men's javelin throw

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB/talk 16:46, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The DNQ for Benjamin Garcia was wrong. Garcia was qualified for the final (71,17 m first attempt in the qualification round = Rank 9). In the final he failed to record a fair throw (see [] at page 339). --OlympicLegends (talk) 00:03, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benjamin Garcia 
Talk:Athletics at the 1956 Summer Olympics – Men's triple jump

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB/talk 17:49, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Athletics at the 1956 Summer Olympics – Men's high jump

message: "The finalists all cleared a height of 1.86 metres"
Seems odd to label everyone who cleared 1.86 as a finalist.
CBHA (talk) 17:12, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finalists? 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB/talk 17:47, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Athletics at the 1956 Summer Olympics – Men's long jump

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB/talk 17:50, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Athletics at the 1956 Summer Olympics – Men's shot put

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB/talk 17:48, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 